Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A36128	eng Lunsford, Thomas,-- Sir, 1610?-1653?
A56169	How then can they call it Old, or the Good Old Man or Cause, without a contradiction and absurdity?
A61735	To Ireland, said they, why?
A41361	Can his Holiness, think you, dispense with that pain, Or by his Indulgences raise them again?
A41361	He may give them leave, To Lye and Dece ● ve; But what when the Rope do''s of Life them bereave?
A41361	T''every one of these men The Jesuits brought( 27) Ten, To dispro ● e''em in Time and in Place; but what then?
A42971	''T is false and absur''d, Wou''d th''Godly hang Papists for Interest or Pique?
A42971	My Witnesses I bring, and produced the Record, D''ye think th''are Perjur''d?
A42971	Wou''d a Doctor Swear false for Ten Pound a Week?
A33406	Ah now what is become of all our subtilty?
A33406	And now, what can we do more?
A33406	And was not this answered like himself, think you, my sons?
A33406	Now Sirs, why should not we prevail as well as this deceiver, whom for example I have mentioned to you my Children?
A33406	have not we as many Motives, as plausible Rhetoricians to perswade?
A14924	Shall we therefore that are his subiects, be discouraged, hauing so couragious a King?
A14924	Thē they demaunded, For what purpose?
A14924	Whereupon, the Uicar of the Parish being asked whether he would bury her?
A09493	And being demanded why he Baptized them?
A09493	The King himselfe asked them whether they were Christians or no?
A09493	the Father answered: why doth the King inforce Christians to forsake their faith, and become Mahometans?
A38185	And it shall come to pass, when your Children shall say unto you, What mean you by this Service?
A38185	But are these things according to the Gospel of Peace?
A38185	I know he calls the Bread his Body, but then he calls the Cup his Bloud, and shall one be allowed to be a figure, and not the other?
A38185	Is it not strange that Christ should eat himself, and that all the Disciples should eat him alive before the Jews had Crucified him?
A38185	Must the Pope cut off Heads because St. Peter cut off an Ear?
A38185	Now should I in the language of this Scripture come to the Common People at the celebration of the Mass, and say, What mean you by this Service?
A38185	What satisfactory answer can be expected?
A38185	You know the Devil could tempt our Saviour in Scripture language, shall we therefore expunge these Scriptures because the Devil used them?
A68099	At the opening whereof, what a Chaos?
A68099	Haue the gates of death beene opened vnto thee?
A68099	Quis talia fando Temperet à lachrymis?
A68099	Who can to the life expresse the face of Death, presenting it selfe in so ruefull and different shapes?
A68099	or hast thou seene the doares of the shadow of death?
A68099	what fearefull obiects?
A68099	what lamentable representations?
A67231	''T is, indeed, a very sad thing; but( Gentlemen) if you will not do it your selves, Who can distinguish you?
A67231	1. de Clericis) They stand not bound to the Laws of any Prince coactively; but directively onely?
A67231	Ask him further, What if they will not be directed, but tread those Laws under their feet?
A67231	Ask him, How we can be assured that his Catholicks will prove good Subjects?
A67231	But what if they should chance( and what has been may be) to be found ingaged in Treason?
A67231	But what say they to the Laity?
A67231	Would Ambrose have slipt so, as to have writ, Non habent haereditatem Petri, qui fidem Petri non habent?
A67231	Would B ● sil have assigned to Alexandria, and Antioch, a better title to the succession of Peter?
A67231	Would Heirome have said, Pari omnes, inter se Authoritate fuisse Apostolos?
A67231	Would the third Councill of Carthage( wherein St. Augustine was present) have past a Decree, That none should be stiled Head, or Prince of Priests?
A53453	But if P. W. object, that if his Majesty were under an obligation preceding and opposite to theirs, why did he enter into an obligation unto them?
A53453	But if all were pardoned by the peace made in 1648. why does he remember the Judgements for the breaches in 1646?
A53453	Can his Majesty trust them, if they be not faithful to their Conscience- ingagement?
A53453	Countrey- men, when his Majesties free Election of a chief Governor, and such a one as the Duke of Ormond is, can not do it?
A53453	For if the flame be so in the green Tree ▪ what will it be in the dry?
A53453	If, I say, all this be not true, why does P. W. say it?
A53453	Suppose all be involved in one Common guilt, is the eye of P. W. evil, because his Majesties is good?
A53453	and if they be, can he trust them when their Consciences ingage them to his Enemy?
A53453	if he did, why was it printed?
A53453	if he thinks all were not, why does he not remember the breaches made in 1641. and at least attribute some of those Judgements to that breach?
A53453	if it be true, what can others expect?
A53453	or, is there any necessity to extend the same Grace to all; or to render a Reason, where onely Grace makes the difference?
A80451	And by whom?
A80451	And in whose Troop, Company, or Ward so admitted?
A80451	And where the said Arms now are?
A80451	What now deteynes them there?
A80451	What occasions called them thither?
A80451	What their names and sirnames are, and of what sept or kindred they be?
A80451	Whence they came?
A80451	Where they now lodge, and since their coming to Town have lodged either in the houses of Papists or Protestants?
A34722	And what is the cause, that after so many yeares of preaching of the Gospell, that the common people still retaine a sent of the Roman perfume?
A34722	But whence shall the streame follow that must feed this bounty?
A34722	How can we draw others to our Church; if we can not agree, where, or how to lay our Foundation?
A34722	What was the cause why the Spartans continued their governmēt so many Revolutions of times, without mutations?
A34722	],[ London?
A33346	12.11, 12, 14, 26, 27. saith Moses to them, when your Children shall say unto you, What mean you by this service?
A33346	But Do ye thus requite the Lord, O foolish people, and unwise?
A33346	How many such Snakes have we amongst us, that return evil for good, and unkindness for kindness?
A33346	Is not he thy Father?
A33346	Is not this to fight against God, with his own weapons?
A33346	O our God, wilt thou not judge them?
A33346	SPaines King with Navies great the Seas bestrew''d, T''augment with English Crown his Spanish sway: Ask ye what caus''d this proud attempt?
A33346	STraverat innumeris Hispanus classibus aequor, Regnis juncturus Sceptra Britana suis Tanti hujus rogitas quae motus causa?
A33346	Shall Haman, whilest he practising to destroy all the people of God, be hanged on a Gallows fifty foot high, which he had prepared for Mordecai?
A33346	Shall Herod, whilest he is priding himself in the flattering applanse of the people, be eaten of worms?
A33346	Shall Nebuchadnezzar, while he is vaunting of his great Babylon, be berest of his wits?
A33346	Shall the House where the Philistins met together to sport with Sampson, fall upon their heads?
A33346	Should we not remember that good turns aggravate unkindnesses, and our offences are not a little encreased by our obligations?
A33346	What then may we judge of those persons in our daies, who labour to extenuate, yea annihilate these deliverances?
A33346	You can not be ignorant how things proceed?
A33346	and in thine hand is there not power and might, so that none is able to withstand thee?
A33346	and rulest not thou over all the Kingdoms of the Earth?
A33346	as David did against Goliah: as Jehu did against Jehoram: and as Benhadad did against Ahab, with that life that he had lately given him?
A33346	how ordinary an evil is this among us, to abuse our deliverances to Gods''dishonour?
A33346	that would have no publick commemorations of them, that study how to invalidate them, and to blot out the remembrance of them?
A35564	333. in proportion to their number and what is that, among so many millions of other men?
A35564	And have not you well deserved of Christianity?
A35564	But durst you, even now, undertake, that every twentieth or fiftieth man, or woman generally, among you, is able to give an account of their Faith?
A35564	But what say you, if I can help you in this also?
A35564	Do not you forbid your adversaries, to use dead testimonies,( that is, Fathers and Councils:) or some book granted to be sacred?
A35564	Do not you upon that account, exclude Christs promise to his Church?
A35564	Have not you told us many times you admit of nothing, to have any part in the rule of faith but Oral Tradition?
A35564	So in England: How elsewhere?
A35564	So now: Will you have a fight of former times, from unquestionable Records?
A35564	The fourth, Whether he had not married one, that had been married before; or a Widow?
A35564	The second, Whether he had not lain with a Nun?
A35564	The third, with a Beast?
A35564	Then secondly, injuriously uncivill: in what?
A35564	This, the way, and the onely way God hath appointed, and Mankind must trust unto?
A35564	Who hath not heard of that admirable or regeneration of Learning, by all kind of Writers, since, or about that time, so much extolled and magnified?
A51173	And didst not thou thereupon affirm, that thy Vows were in Heaven, and thy Letters and Promises on Earth to binde thee to do it?
A51173	And didst thou not conceive it, promise it, vow it, swear it, and receive the Sacrament that thou wouldst do it?
A51173	And that therewith, and upon some Speeches used by her Majesty, thou didst turn about and weep bitterly to thy self?
A51173	And wouldest thou have run into such fear as thou didst confess that thou wert in, when thou didst utter it, if thou hadst never meant it?
A51173	Didst thou not confess this?
A51173	For how suddainly had we been taken and surprized when it we lest suspected, had it not been for Captain Flemming?
A51173	For if that be true, where are then his Vows which he said were in Heaven, his Letter and Promise upon Earth?
A51173	How can we believe that thou now sayest?
A51173	I asked him, How will you escape forth of the Garden?
A51173	It containeth but the parts that have been openly read, I pray you tell me?
A51173	She hath sought, said he, your ruine and overthrow, why should you not then seek to revenge it?
A51173	Sometimes I said to my self, Why should I care for her?
A51173	Then said the Lord Hunsdon, Sayest thou now, that thou didst never mean to kill the Queen?
A51173	These be the matters you must look to, what say you to them?
A51173	This being now resolved on, there arose a great Question, who should have the Honor of the first going in?
A51173	Was not this true?
A51173	What meanest thou by that, said Master Vice- Chamberlain?
A51173	What reason canst thou shew for thy self?
A51173	What sayest thou, William Parry, Art thou guilty of these Treasons whereof thou standest here Indicted, or not guilty?
A51173	Why hath he stollen out of the Popes shop so large an Indulgence and plenary Remission of all his Sins, and meant to perform nothing that he promised?
A51173	Why was he so specially prayed for and remembred at the Altar?
A51173	Why was his Devotion and Zeal so highly commended?
A51173	have I not spent 10000 Marks since I knew her service, and never had peny by her?
A51173	what hath she done for me?
A07806	* Vt i ● gulent homines, surgunt de nocte Latrones: vt teipsum serues non expergisceris?
A07806	466. g Illinc clament, viue Rex, quem nè salutare possint, nec in d ● mum suam recipere?
A07806	And doe not the most of that Sect canonize in their conceits all such popish ones, as haue been executed for manifest treasons?
A07806	And what of this?
A07806	But how if he be not excommunicate by name?
A07806	But what if Kings will not inthrall themselues to the Popes authoritie?
A07806	But why?
A07806	By whom are they freed?
A07806	Christianae imminet,& vbi nouus hostis viget, multo quàm Turca infestior, eò potius cursum conuertere oportet?
A07806	Durst these Inginers doe any such thing without direction from their priests?
A07806	Father Parsons( in his Dolman) a principall Rector in the Seminarie at Rome?
A07806	How so?
A07806	How?
A07806	In quos vestrūm; populum exastuantem contra vos, insurgere solicita ● ● mus?
A07806	Is it a wonder any should wonder that a Monke could murder a mortall King?
A07806	Or whose death did wee euer conspire?
A07806	Quid cogitas?
A07806	Satisfie vs yet in one question more: Suppose that the Protestant Prince haue a iust quarrell: what then?
A07806	Say Father Creswell is this true?
A07806	Say then what is to be thought of the worthines of the fact?
A07806	Shall we thinke that other priests can haue more loyall spirits?
A07806	Sometime the Prince is personallie excommunicate: what then?
A07806	What is this else, than to aduance a dogge to be soueraigne ouer men?
A07806	What other meaning can armes haue, but onely blood?
A07806	What shall I neede to mention Reinolds( in his Rosaeus) a Doctor of Diuinitie, and chiefest man in the English Seminarie at Rhemes?
A07806	With whom giue me rather leaue to marueile in your behalfe,* Why are you so easily remoued from the Gospell of Christ?
A07806	Yea, what though not excommunicate?
A07806	by Gods will counselling and approuing it?
A07806	c Otherwise( saith Stapleton) what do people else but euen preferre man before God?
A07806	f Vultis in Regno Galliae Christianissim ● Regem Proclamare Nauarraeum Caluinistam?
A07806	f Will ye proclaime Nauarre a Caluinist, King of the most Christian kingdome of France?
A07806	g Shall Catholiques pray God saue that King, whom they may not admit into their houses?
A07806	h For suppose( saith Father Creswell) that hee professe to bring in a more sound religion; what is this to the purpose?
A07806	in Angliam, cuius semen Adulterinum vix à Turcic internasci possit?
A07806	quibus vitae periculum attulimus?
A34067	12?
A34067	4?
A34067	And is not this notorious forgery?
A34067	Did not the Saxon Kings preside in all National Councils, and make Laws for Religion by the advice of their own Bishops, by their own Authority?
A34067	Did they discharge their Vniversal Headship well in this Concealment?
A34067	Did they not erect new Sees for Bishops, and change them as they saw fit?
A34067	Did they not invest all Bishops by delivering the Ring and Pastoral Staff t?
A34067	Do they not forbid things which God hath allowed, as in the case of Priests Marriage?
A34067	Do they not presume to dispense with the very Laws of God, in many cases of Matrimony and Divorce, of Vows, Oaths, Leagues and Contracts?
A34067	If they knew of them of old, why did they let them sleep so long, and suffer the Church to erre for so many years for want of them?
A34067	Let none( saith Epiphanius) adore Mary; but why do I mention a Woman?
A34067	Now we may try this by considering what are the ends of True Religion, and whether these Principles serve to advance those ends?
A34067	SECTION V. Whether the Roman Bishop have sufficient Authority to impose the said Opinions upon all Christian Churches?
A34067	Secondly, Is it not a great derogation to an Infinite and Invisible Being, to be represented by an Image, and worshipped under such Representations?
A34067	Secondly, Let us examine whether these Doctrines do assist you in the Devout worshipping of God?
A34067	Shall the Physician be said to reproach him whose disease he discovers to him b?
A34067	THe next Enquiry is, By what means these New Doctrines became so generally believed?
A34067	Thirdly, Doth not the Doctrine of Merits cast a palpable dishonour upon the glorious Redemption wrought by Jesus Christ?
A34067	Whether all Payments and Obedience to the Pope should not be taken away h?
A34067	Whether the Roman Opinions, which differ from the Church of England, be the Old Religion?
A34067	Whether the said Opinions tend to advance the Ends of true Religion?
A34067	Whether the said Opinions were not established by evil means?
A34067	Whether the said Opinions were not introduced for evil Ends?
A34067	Whether the things themselves be good in their own nature, and Parts of true Religion?
A34067	Why may ▪ you not take the same liberty to oppose his Decrees, that your Ancestors in all Ages have done?
A34067	and taking the Cup from the People?
A34067	do they forbid it that Priests may be more pure?
A34067	if not, how then came the later Popes to the knowledge of them?
A34067	if they were true, why doth she now reject them?
A34067	to support a Power which is inconsistent with the Security of the Crown, the Peace of the Kingdom, and the welfare of Private persons?
A40452	And shall not the Bleeding Iphigenia make the most obdurate to relent?
A40452	And what is don in the end?
A40452	And what is our lott, and share of this Tragicall play, after your Royall promisees of all favour and Protection?
A40452	Becanus doth declare( examining this question) an aliquando liceat invasorem praevenire& illum occidere antequam nos actu invadat?
A40452	But what shall I doe to a man, that hath stained his soule with the spott of herisy?
A40452	But will Orery tell us, with what Beame would hee have the blooddy Rebellion of Crumwell, of himselfe and the rest written?
A40452	By what Law are wee thus treated, and destroy''d, by that of God, or Nature, or Nations?
A40452	Can any oath be more horrid, or can any written wickedness ascend higher?
A40452	Did ever any call the faire Country of Ireland a Pest- house but this man?
A40452	Durus percussam morte perire sinit: Sic gentem superis fidam,& te semper amantem Rex das mactandam?
A40452	How is the faithfull Cittie, full of Iudgment, becom an harlott?
A40452	How then say men came this about?
A40452	How?
A40452	Is not this a pious gloss of a Geneua Presbiterian upon a wicked theme?
A40452	Now if such defense is lawfull for privat men, how much more for a Common wealth or Nation?
A40452	Orery all this is true, but what Illation make you of this?
A40452	Orery by the quarrell, wee intended to hold what of Ireland was ours, against invaders; who can blame us for this?
A40452	Our Eyes and harts O God are turn''d upon thee, seing men have abandon''d us; O Lord when will the day come of our Happiness?
A40452	Quis est qui sic humiliat sublimes reges terrae?
A40452	Regis an iste amor est?
A40452	SAnguinat ante aras hoc Iphigenia libello, Quis nisi praedurus temperet a lacrimis?
A40452	Shall I not vissite upon these things, saith our Lord?
A40452	Speak freely your minde, and tell us on what side were you when the King was murthered, of Crumwells party or the Kings?
A40452	This is a false Calamny, tell us Orery in what Romish University or School is this Doctrin Common?
A40452	Transit levites plangens; quid Samaritanus?
A40452	Was ever such a diffinition given of Religion?
A40452	What I pray is contained in that Bull, that an honest man can reprehend?
A40452	Whether somtyms it is lawfull for us to prevent the invader, and kill him, afore he actually invad''s us?
A40452	Who but a beast would call a noble and ancient Nation a beaest?
A40452	Why soe King David?
A40452	and consequently can any mercy be greater then the pardon his Majesty hath granted to the men that hartily took this oath?
A40452	can the mercifull brest of a Clement King endure to see soe many sad spectacles of woes, and miserys without all relief?
A40452	doth not hee show the spleen, and rancor of a cankered hart, in this high tone, and storme of Language against a whole Catholick Nation?
A40452	how could soe clement a King be induced to afflict soe loyall a people, as the Catholicks of England, and Ireland?
A40452	in what Catholick Court is this practice?
A40452	or upon such a Nation shall not my soule take revenge?
A40452	what did your Majesty see in us, that could render us in capable of the pardon granted to the Rebells in generall?
A40452	what were they then doeing?
A40452	where I say againe, have these men been in the dark day of your Callamitys, and adversitys?
A40452	who I pray are those that touched the annoyntings, and the annoynted, the Catholicks of Ireland; or Cromwells party?
A40452	why being Innocent doe wee suffer this contumely?
A40452	why came soe many poore indigint men out of England this age into this Pesthouse to make theire fortunes?
A40452	why left under a staine of Rebellion, the true Rebells being forgiven?
A40452	will not God at long running look downe, and examin these cruell proceedings?
A40452	would Orery have the Pope be soe madd, as to forbid his Children to defend themselves and Religion against him, and his Companions?
A02680	And alas what lesse can they doe?
A02680	And is it then good Logicke, that the Bishops may usurpe their power, and entrench upon the right of the Secular arme?
A02680	And so often as this hapned, what did those Prelats?
A02680	And why were not the rest of the Lopers clennsed, but onely Naaman the Syrian?
A02680	And why?
A02680	Are all Apostles?
A02680	Are all Doctors?
A02680	Are all Miracles?
A02680	Are all Prophets?
A02680	As how?
A02680	At Rome?
A02680	Can wee beleeve all this, and many other things no lesse strange, for the authority of one Livy, renowned in the Roman history?
A02680	Doe all interpret?
A02680	Doe all speake with tongues?
A02680	Goe to the pismire O sluggard, and may not the Friar be sent unto his fables of Esop, with a vade ad Esopum stulte?
A02680	Harris, Paul, 1573- 1635?
A02680	Harris, Paul, 1573- 1635?
A02680	Harris, Paul, 1573- 1635?
A02680	Have all the grace of doing cures?
A02680	How comes it to passe( say you) That in those which you call holy places, and have in so high an estimation,& glory so much of their miracles?
A02680	How is it possible, that wit, capacity, or common sense, should not avert these men from such violent and out- ragious courses against P. Harris?
A02680	How is it to be beleeved say some?
A02680	How often doe we finde in former ages?
A02680	How then is your sentence confirmed of which no mention is made?
A02680	How then now confirmed?
A02680	How then say I, comes it to passe?
A02680	How truely is it said?
A02680	I demaund in this case, Quid juris?
A02680	I say, why should I not hope these things of them?
A02680	I would willingly understand?
A02680	Is it?
A02680	Is it?
A02680	May not our Franciscans remember, that the first blast and brunt of that tempest, discharged it selfe upon their owne Cells& Oratoryes?
A02680	Now what was the cause why no other Widow was exempted from that famine, but only the Widow of Sarepta?
A02680	Of which dispositiōs, Faith is the principall?
A02680	Spectatum admissi risum teneatis amici?
A02680	That because the King will not strike, that therefore the Bishop may take the sword out of his hand, and lay about him?
A02680	The innumerable miracles of the holy Ermites, living in the desarts of Lybia, recounted by Theoderet in his religious history?
A02680	The miracles approved by S Gregory the Great in his Dialogues?
A02680	The miracles of many Saints, wrought at their tombes and monuments, testified by S. Augustine in his Bookes De civitate Dei?
A02680	The miracles reported by S. Bede in his Ecclesiasticall History& lives of Saints?
A02680	Was there then any insufficiencie of almighty GOD, to have supplyed these defects, or to have remedied these diseases at the memory of his Saints?
A02680	Well, what then?
A02680	What shall we say of Tarquinius Priscus the fift King of the Romans, who cut a whetstone in two parts with a rasor?
A02680	What then is to bee done?
A02680	What''s the next?
A02680	When as the Iewes demanded of him, Quis peccavit, hic, aut parentes ejus, ut coecus naseeretur?
A02680	Where shall Sempronius sue his Bond against Titius?
A02680	Who then be they that shall doe greater workes then our Saviour did?
A02680	Why?
A02680	but the faithfull who were to succeed in the future ages of the Church?
A02680	hath malice against one man so blinded their judgments, and so perverted their wills?
A02680	have these men so soone forgotten S. Stevens day?
A02680	of Meath answer this neglect, or rather contempt of the Romane command?
A02680	so few to be cured, or to returne home sound of winde,& lim,& in perfect health?
A02680	the first Hermite, and by Hilarion, recorded by S. Hierom?
A02680	wanted there the power of GOD, or due preparation in the Subject: Who can say so?
A02680	what doth the Friar?
A02680	what pitty is it?
A41019	16 What agreement hath the Temple of God with idols?
A41019	7. upon what a sandie foundation is the Romish Babell built?
A41019	Aggravate th ● s fact of his to the height, doth this Priest himselfe doe lesse?
A41019	And i ● this doctrine were never heard of before; what then?
A41019	And if I seeme to Protestants to be a Protestant; what am I the worse for that?
A41019	And if any did suffer for the same, I pray let him likewise whisper when, or in what yeere, or Kings reign?
A41019	And if your tribe did not finde it out before; is it a wonder?
A41019	And is this a piece of holynesse to goe on such dayes to a play?
A41019	And why should there be now more shew of evill in the act, then at that time?
A41019	Brownists( as I have said) have Recusancie, doth it therefore follow, that they are likewise Catholiques?
A41019	But doth he think that we know not what a Papist is?
A41019	But if povertie be scandalous, why do the Fryars by a vow of perfection, as they terme it, undertake this scandalous povertie?
A41019	Did Abner die a foole?
A41019	Die as fooles?
A41019	Doest thou know me?
A41019	Fe ● end ● m ne est ut, gentilis sacrif ● c ● t, christianus inter sit?
A41019	For I wonder by what law a m ● n is bound to make any other Protestation of his beliefe for the doing of a thing indifferent?
A41019	For a testimony against them?
A41019	For how can he certainly know the intention of the Bishop or Priest who administred unto him these rites, all which they account sacraments?
A41019	For one man may get a distinctive signe of another mans institution; shall God therefore own him?
A41019	For what would a man get, by hating of God?
A41019	For where may we finde his institution?
A41019	For who instituted that service to be such a signe?
A41019	For who made it such a signe?
A41019	God, or man?
A41019	How can there be any counsels of perfection over and above the law, when the law of Christ requireth perfection it selfe?
A41019	How suddenly might we be cheated of our Religion, Liberties, Lawes, yea and lives to?
A41019	I wonder by this kinde of conversation, what kinde of conversion could ensue?
A41019	If he be not knowne; how can he give more scandall, then Naaman did?
A41019	If they held it not, how were they saved, upon what good ground or warrant are so many of them canonized for Saints even by the Roman Church?
A41019	If they may be deceived as men, why not as Popes?
A41019	If you aske me, what is then the signe to know a Catholique from any other Sectary?
A41019	Is it therefore false or scandalous?
A41019	Let Davenport have the day of Day at Rome, what hath Sancta Clara done that in the charita ● le censure of this Priest Lucifer must have him?
A41019	Let them remember what Polycarp did answer when Marcion accoasting him said, Nosti me?
A41019	Not by institution: for if so, who instituted the same?
A41019	Not danger of subversion: for to what purpose should they preach subversive doctrine?
A41019	Now in the Protestant Churches what contumelious words are spoken against God with a minde,& c?
A41019	Now what obstinacie can Protestants be said to have in their opinions with relation to a Church, they know not?
A41019	Quo teneam vultus mutantem Protea nodo?
A41019	Quot millia pass ● um declamasti?
A41019	Sirs, know ye not, saith Demetrius, that by this craft we have our wealth?
A41019	So that as a man receiveth good by holy?
A41019	This appeares true to every meane capacitie: What danger then can there be in going to Church?
A41019	What care they though Recusants sinke in England, so long as they swim in abundance beyond the Sea?
A41019	What then becomes of works of supererogation, when a mans stock or treasure of good workes can not hold out to pay his own debts?
A41019	Whether it be lawfull for a Catholique to heare the Prayers, Epistles, Gospels and Psalmes of the Catholique Church among Protestants in their Church?
A41019	Whether it be lawfull for a Catholique to receive bare bread and wine in remembrance that Christ dyed for him, as a pious ceremony?
A41019	Whether it be lawfull to frequent the Churches of hereticks, where there is both imminent danger of subversion and scandall?
A41019	Why have ye not houses to eate and drinke in?
A41019	Why should we not communicate with Protestants where there can be no danger of sinne?
A41019	Why then recusancie being rejected, should he not professe the same?
A41019	Yet hence it doth not follow, that I am bound to goe into the Market place and cry out; I am a Catholike, who will punish me?
A41019	and how loose and weake is the maine ground of a Papists faith?
A41019	and presently judge them as fallen men whom they dislike?
A41019	and to goe to Sermons as to a play to make themselves merry, and dispell a Melancholly dumpe?
A41019	and whether not better, so taken, then without such remembrance?
A41019	and who can say his heart is cleane from all these?
A41019	are they Friers secular Priests, or Devils that thus spit fire one at another?
A41019	d With what face can he say that the Protestants are incredulous and beleeve not the truth?
A41019	e Is this the holy Romane Religion, to make a May- game of Religion?
A41019	g Will you call it the same wine which was powred out into two cups, whereof one hath store of rats- bane in it?
A41019	how sacred are your lawes?
A41019	if so many Popes might be deceived by false suggestions, why not by false arguments, and objections?
A41019	if they may be deceived in matter of fact, why not in matter of faith, which often dependeth upon matter of fact?
A41019	may be limited by their distinction of a Iudge competent and incompetent?
A41019	or the Church, of which himselfe must be a member, to be saved?
A41019	or to whom?
A41019	shall we be afraid to let a Greyhound goe into the p field, for feare he should be taken by an Hare?
A41019	thereby to introduce for their own ends, our now goodly distinctive sign of recusancie?
A41019	what horrible prophannesse, what detestable hypocrisie is it?
A41019	what thought take they for the parents mulcts and taxes by the state, so long as their Pupils scores are paid in their Colleges?
A48822	* for the Sovereignty of Scotland?
A48822	Again, who condemn''d your great School- Men, Suarez and Valentia?
A48822	And how can a simple Heretick tell, whether it calls you, to Pray, or to eat Fish?
A48822	And if it were for his Service, that they would have destroyed Her; pray for whose service was it, that they would have defeated Him?
A48822	And why hath not His Holiness dealt so with him that now is?
A48822	But did they ever intend their sufferings should go for nothing, or become Ciphers to yours in the day of Reckoning?
A48822	But how has this Doctrine taken among the Papists in our Kings Dominions?
A48822	But how if that Queen had not been a Catholick?
A48822	But if they were observed to the full; should we therefore grant You that Liberty which is against Law?
A48822	But in what sense do you call them Desperadoes?
A48822	But pray Sir, what think you of it?
A48822	But pray Sir, when was it that you govern''d the civiliz''d World?
A48822	But pray Sir, who condemned your Cardinals, Bellarmine and Baronius?
A48822	But what is this to England?
A48822	But what of that?
A48822	But what trick had this Jesuite in his head when he fram''d this?
A48822	But what was all this to the thrice Noble Queen of Scots?
A48822	But when the Treason had miscarried, as hateful as it was,( for who does not hate Treason when it is unsuccessful?)
A48822	But where were the Jesuites all the while?
A48822	But who could help it?
A48822	But why did you not say this for those Conspiracies in Queen Elizabeths daies?
A48822	But would you seriously perswade us, that, at six years distance, so many men of heat and youth were still transported with the Joy of that Blessing?
A48822	But, supposing this to be true, pray what would you infer from it?
A48822	By what Tradition did you receive it?
A48822	Can you tell us which of the Conspirators were Cecil''s Instruments to draw in the rest?
A48822	Concerning your Principles, where should we look for them, but in your Councils, your Decretals, and the Books of your Divines?
A48822	Did not your Pope force King John to do him homage for England?
A48822	Did they think your condition was so deplorable, or their own was superfluously fenced and secured against you before the late troubles?
A48822	For pray Sir, what did they to be called Protestants?
A48822	For what cause then were they enacted?
A48822	For who ever said, that All the Papists of that Age were Consenting to the Gun- Powder- Treason?
A48822	From that time forward, you that were, always, all, deemed Cavaliers, where were you?
A48822	Hath he not often laid claim to the Kingdom of Ireland?
A48822	If the old Gentleman in a pet should go to turn out his Tenant, what would our King have left, when these are disposed of?
A48822	If you call any thing Religion, that is contrary to these; must we therefore alter our Laws?
A48822	In all those weak Efforts* of gasping Loyalty, what did you?
A48822	In vain did the poor Royallist strive against it, for what could he do?
A48822	Nay, who has condemned our Country- man Parsons, or Cresswel?
A48822	Or can you think he was so great an Artist, that he could perswade his Setters to be hang''d, that his Art might not be suspected?
A48822	Or had you some new Revelation of the Causes threescore years after the Fact?
A48822	Or mean you the Treason which was to have been acted upon that day?
A48822	Or who can deny that some Papists in this Age retain the Principles of them that were consenting to it?
A48822	Possibly she might have been preferred to have married one of the rwo?
A48822	Pray Sir, can you tell who are said to intend this?
A48822	Pray Sir, do not Popish- Peers sit in our English Parliaments, as well as Protestants in the French?
A48822	Pray Sir, may it not well be said, that Papists can not live without persecuting Protestants?
A48822	Pray Sir, what may that be?
A48822	Pray Sir, whence had you this tale?
A48822	Pray Sir, who Thought it?
A48822	Pray what Liberty have the Protestants in Flanders?
A48822	That day which is the Festival of our Deliverance?
A48822	The like may be said of divers other Countries: Nay in England, while it was Yours, did you give any Liberty at all?
A48822	These barbarous people, you say, sequester none for their Faith; but pray what did you, when you govern''d the Civiliz''d World?
A48822	These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home: and shall they then be forgotten by you?
A48822	These things have been done by Papists broad awake; and what must that be which the wickedst of them never dreamt of?
A48822	Was it because they had not all the Liberty they would have had?
A48822	Was it ever the less Treason because he drew them into it?
A48822	We cry you mercy, if they were no more; but that comes next to be argued, Whether they were Misdemeanors or Treasons?
A48822	Were they such in respect of their Discontents?
A48822	Were they such in respect of their Fortunes?
A48822	What a Coil here was about the Miracle of Father Garnet''s straw?
A48822	What a Hardship was this, that the House of Commons would not do that for your sakes, which no House of Commons ever did upon any occasion?
A48822	What is it that you abominate and detest?
A48822	What then?
A48822	Who doubts less of the dangerousness of your Principles and Practices, than they that have Read most, and had most Experience of them?
A48822	[ But let it not displease you, Men, Brethren, and Fathers, if we ask whether Ulysses be no better known?
A48822	[ Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass- Bell for that which calls to Dinner?]
A48822	[ Or a Sequestrator be glad to be affronted being Constable?
A48822	[ These are they that by beginning with us, murthered their Prince, and wounded you: and shall the same method continue by your Approbation?
A48822	[ What have we done that we should now deserve your Anger?
A48822	[ Why may we not, noble Country- men, hope for favour from you, as well as French Protestants finde from theirs?
A48822	and the People you have kill''d up by whole Families and Townships?
A48822	murthered by Fryar Clement?
A48822	murthered by Ravilliac?
A48822	or Queen Elizabeth had not Been thought Illegitimate?
A48822	or did they mistrust( in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home, because they were of the same profession?
A48822	or have you not as free access to our Kings Brother, as they have to theirs?
A48822	or ought you to mend your Religion?
A48822	or that their blood should be made use of to stop the Execution of those Laws for which they shed it?
A48822	or what did we to be judged Popishly Affected?
A48822	or when arose that Question?
A48822	or whom would it not grieve to have his Loyalty called in Question?
A48822	or would a Popish Bastard have been rejected by them?
A48822	or would you have his Highness to Catechise, as the Abbot had the Duke of Glocester?
A48822	since the Son is King, who is not glad † that he is King?
A48822	were they idle for so many years as past between the commencing of his Title, and the Death of Queen Elizabeth?
A48822	why then do you not speak out and call it so?
A48822	would a legitimate Protestant have been so contended for?
A86261	And hide thy head, when ther''s most need of thee?
A86261	And many death- door- knocking Souls complain?
A86261	And only by damn''d Luthers haeresie, That turn- coat caiti ● s matchles villany?
A86261	And thinkst thou, than, I can with patience brook, So rich a prey to be, thus, from me took?
A86261	And was not this a craft rak''d out of Hell By divellish furies?
A86261	And who so impious, so audacious bold?
A86261	And wilt thou( now) a milk- sop dastard be?
A86261	Are not these, thē, Roms white- divels?
A86261	But these, vile Achabs case far worser stood, For; why?
A86261	Can they( said I?)
A86261	Can ye for shame, assume the sacred name Of Jesus Christ, and yet his grace disclaim?
A86261	Did not the heavenly husband- man declare His sacred minde, touching the wheat and tare?
A86261	Do thorns bear grapes?
A86261	Do you with blood your followers, thus infect?
A86261	Does not our High- Priest curse those Hereticks, And pray for us?
A86261	Doth not St. Paul, doth not all Scripture show, No evill ought be done that good may grow?
A86261	Doubt we to go- on?
A86261	For all''s most true, they teach, which Rome doth say?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For why?
A86261	For, these destroy''d, what were a Realm, but dead?
A86261	For, what sayes Christ, the spring of verity, To all his Saints, for all posterity?
A86261	For, what though we the King- alone destroy, Leaves he not after him, a Prince t''enjoy His Crown ▪ and Scepter?
A86261	Grant, whose foule hopes, Heaven also foolifi''d, To whom, none( yet) had these things certifi''d,( For why?
A86261	How could the vault in time, have bin detected, Which all the while was never( once) suspected?
A86261	How fair doth it show, With peace and plenties blessed harmony, With every mercies sweet variety?
A86261	If, a mean- man to slay be detestable, Then, how much more had this bin execrable?
A86261	If, to shed- bloud, be cal''d a crying- sin, How much more monstrous had this murther bin?
A86261	In''s wretched hands the Eucharist to hold?
A86261	Instead wherof, how doth thy land, still, flow, With milk and honey?
A86261	Is this the charity you all professe?
A86261	It may be, some condemn thee; what''s the reason?
A86261	Lastly, they all consult and take advice, What forrein Prince, they heerto might intice?
A86261	Let this, to us, be a sharp goad and spur, Why fear we?
A86261	Nay, will you( yet) heare more impiety, Equall( almost) to deepest villany?
A86261	Nought, but bare outsides; their best- part, their name?
A86261	O English Protestants, why stand you still, As if affraid to curbe Romes cursed will?
A86261	O are not these foule broods of vipers vile, And Pluto''s Locusts full of fraud and guile?
A86261	O must our bloud be spilt, our King be slain?
A86261	O then, dear friends, why stand we to demur?
A86261	Or the tall- palme, yeeld pleasant fruite?
A86261	Or whither''t were some addle, idle- brain, That this had writ to cause him thence refrain?
A86261	Romes faithlesse Synagogue to re- advance, Full stuft with pride, errour and ignorance?
A86261	Shall I put- up these heavy losses so, And ope a gate to greater over- throw?
A86261	Should he not( then) from due discretion swerve?
A86261	So rich a pearle unto such swines to throw?
A86261	The Christians, eke, defending valiantly Their town of Rhods,''gainst Pagans, lost the same; Must we the cause( then) by th''event( here) blame?
A86261	To whom so doubting Greenwell, thus, began, Why how now( brother Hall) what frights thee man?
A86261	Triumphing in the trophies, pitteous spoyl, Of their destroyed Kingdome, native- soyle?
A86261	Under their cloathes?
A86261	Was it not Mercies majesty and joy, That none of his he brought unto annoy?
A86261	Were ever known like blasphemous foule crimes?
A86261	What English Lords and Noble- men to save, Who of this Kingdome, should possession have?
A86261	What better, greater cause to spend our bloods, Than for Religion to spend life and goods?
A86261	What feares within, what foes without, What death, what danger fell Did ever vexus, but it came By Rome and Spain from Hell?
A86261	What was the Divell?
A86261	What winde hath blown our Catholiks together, I prethee tell me wherfore come they hither?
A86261	What?
A86261	Who but a Priest of this Society; Wouldst know his name?
A86261	Who was so godlesse, who so gracelesse, trow?
A86261	Who yeelds due praise to heaven for heavens sweet light?
A86261	Why seem ye( yet) to hault twixt two opinions, Pretending truth, fostring these Romish Minions?
A86261	Would not his foes within, him, dastard deem?
A86261	Wracking their Ships, chaining their Princes great, Swallowing the rest in Seas for fishes meat?
A86261	Yea, all, them sots, not souldiers stout esteem?
A86261	Yea, are they not the very spawn of Hell, The furies of Avernus fierce and fell?
A86261	Yea, canst thou( England) canst thou possibly Be so orewhelmed in stupidity?
A86261	Yet since, so daily, man doth it enjoy, Who is''t( almost) that valews it aright?
A86261	Yet, otherwise, why should they armour weare?
A86261	Your false conceived wrongs( thus) to redresse?
A86261	a lyer, homicide; What''s he?
A86261	are we not all of us Catholicks?
A86261	do figs on thistles grow?
A86261	faint we?
A86261	is not our cause most right, Religious, just?
A86261	what may be the reason Of all this- concourse, at this unfit season?
A01076	10 Whether such supposed succession were afixed to the place, or aplied to the persons?
A01076	11 Whether if the succession were applied to the place, was it not cut off and discontinued when there was no vniuersall Bishop refiant at Rome?
A01076	5 Whether St. Peter ever came at Rome?
A01076	6 Allowing that St. Peter was at Rome, was he not there as an Apostle and so no more appropriate to that place then to the whole world?
A01076	7 Being an Apostle, how came he to be chiefe, yea the vniuersall Pastor over both Iewes and Gentiles?
A01076	And will P. R. the Iesuite, and the rest of the English Catholikes of the Romish faction abide by this word in good earnest?
A01076	Beyond all this the pondering of such seuerall considerations, to whose brest, or trust are they recommended?
A01076	But how doth he convey and conster that part of the oath as concerning the Popes Authority, in dealing with temporall Princes?
A01076	But how doth his outward man manage these difficulties?
A01076	Christ professed himselfe, and so instructed his Disciples, to bee humble and meeke, but how doth the Pope tread that path?
A01076	Dareth he to abide by this?
A01076	Doeth not the inferiour members, patiently, and without repugnance, beare all the offences and surcharges, descending vpon them from the head?
A01076	Doth he imagine by such his initigation to persuade the King and Realme to tolleration?
A01076	God permitteth not the diuell to haue power to destroy the elect and faithfull?
A01076	Hath hee not well collected and conected his propositions to bring out this grand conclusion of superiority ouer Princes?
A01076	Hath shee left any such Law or libertie, that in any respects the childe may renounce or disclaime his parents?
A01076	Hee that hath a power over Hell it selfe, shall not he commaund and over- rule the earth?
A01076	Here is goodly building of Castles in the ayre, Castles did I say?
A01076	Is not this the very same water of the same Cesterne?
A01076	Is there in Nature any so much as desire( much lesse meanes) of remoouing or repressing of the Head?
A01076	Is this so great an impietie thinke you?
A01076	Marke how they compell our Sauiour Iesus Christ to sallogize against himselfe?
A01076	Next vnto the body it selfe, is the issue and off- spring of the bodie, what bounds of dutie hath nature made of the children towards the Father?
A01076	Of what he may do, and what he may not doe?
A01076	Secondly, God may permit Popes( as Popes) to hold hereticall doctrine, but not to decree it, where shall wee finde consistendi locum?
A01076	Shall I coniecture at his conceite in concealing or withdrawing of these words?
A01076	Shall I thinke that he hath never read, or vtterly forgotten the Oath of Supremacy?
A01076	Then what will they say, or do, to free his Majestie from feares and ielousies?
A01076	What moderate meaning hath he found for the safegard of the Catholike consciences that haue taken that oath?
A01076	What shall we think he meaneth by proceeding against the Temporall gouernor?
A01076	Where shall we find more representatiue obedience of Natures intentions and operations, then in these originals and fountaines of Loue?
A01076	Why?
A01076	Will you examine another degree of the opperation of Nature?
A01076	and so consequently a question, whether the latter diuised Titles be likewise authorized from Christ?
A01076	and what is this limitation?
A01076	and what 〈 ◊ 〉 they make for Pope Ioane, whose stay standeth vnrefuted?
A01076	are they not euery one wholly and absolutely in the Popes discretion?
A01076	being declared not as positiue out of the word, but expository, by a sence which the Pope assumeth?
A01076	called the subiects of the Catholike Church?
A01076	except such his Pastorship were rather Apostolicall then Episcopall?
A01076	for feare that his Holinesse be questioned and limited in his owne powre and preeminence?
A01076	is it incident and appropriate to his Princely Scepter, to mayntaine the religion now established in his Dominions?
A01076	making in the meane time no Religion of the limitting, lessening, and detracting from the Soveraignes Title and pre- eminence?
A01076	must not they refuse to sweare vnto that clause of recognition also?
A01076	or if hee haue such a Rule ouer Princes themselues, why not also ouer the Subordinate Officers of the Kingdome?
A01076	that professeth learning, who well knoweth that wee will presently deny the Popish to be the Catholike Church?
A01076	that we haue not departed from the Church?
A01076	when hee hath such an argument ab authoritate to a rest him to stand vnto it?
A01076	which for some hundreths of yeares after Christ, and since the vsurpation Papall for a long time together hath come to passe?
A01076	will Religion allow him more liberty against the highest, then against the meaner Substitutes?
A01076	yea, though the father should( as oft as out of iudgement hee doth) cast off or disinherite his sonne?
A09102	And are not other Catholicks deliuered from the guylt therof, by the long, and diligent search of Iustice made thereabout?
A09102	And are not these goodly definitions( thinke you) for so great and graue a man to produce?
A09102	And can any thing be spoken more cleerly for vs, and for our cause, then this?
A09102	And did not they cyte many places of Scriptures, to proue the equity& necessity therof?
A09102	And do not all Protestants the like at this day, in all places, where they are, both in Polonia, Austria, Hungaria, Bohemia, Styria, and els where?
A09102	And do these words last adioyned make any thing at all for our Apologer?
A09102	And how can these things be defended with any shew or probability of truth?
A09102	And how then are these, and such other places brought in for witnesse, as though they had somwhat to say against vs?
A09102	And how then can this Apologer talke so much of equality vsed in all fauours?
A09102	And how then is Cardinall Bellarmyne said heere to be no lesse contrary to God, concerning Kings Authority, then light to darknes, and heauen to hell?
A09102	And how then, is all this ascribed to the Pope, which proceeded from the Some against his Father?
A09102	And how thē is Iordanis conuersus retrorsum, with this Minister?
A09102	And how thē shall we cleare this importāt matter, VVhether there be any pointes in this Oath belonging to religion, besydes Cyuill Obedience?
A09102	And is this good dealing?
A09102	And is this so absurd doctrine?
A09102	And may a man thinke this to be true or likely, that so rude a proposition should come from Bellarmine?
A09102	And was not this a great in felicity?
A09102	And were it not a great synne to increase the same, by casting in oyle to augmēt the flame?
A09102	And what an abuse of his Maiesties mercie and clemencie, to expect libertie of Conscience?
A09102	And what will the Apologer say heere?
A09102	And wherin thē?
A09102	And why then are men kept in prison, after they haue taken this Oath?
A09102	And why then is this so vniustly layed vpon the Pope?
A09102	And why was all this, but for their Religion?
A09102	And will not the Catholicks of England vse this speach also vnto their King?
A09102	Are they not all gates of Hell?
A09102	Are they not executed, that were culpable therof?
A09102	Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith thus: Iulian was an vnbelieuing Emperour, was he not an Apostata?
A09102	But I would aske him wherin?
A09102	But alas, is there no end of exprobration against the Innocent for the Nocent?
A09102	But if a man would aske him, how he can proue, that those things were so directly inioyned, and plainly authorized, what answere will he make?
A09102	But what is this vnto our Oath?
A09102	But what man is so simple, or sil ● y, that will not presently demaund, how we shall know the certaynty, when Antichrist is to come?
A09102	But what?
A09102	Did S. Ambrose by this acknowledge that the Emperour had higher Authority, then he, in Church- matters?
A09102	Doth this man care what he saith?
A09102	First this: As for the Catholicke Religion( saith he) can there be one word found in all this Oath, tending to matter of Religion?
A09102	For approbation of matters cōcerning faith?
A09102	For how shall the Reader try the truth of this obiection?
A09102	For that this, perhaps, is called the Oath of Allegiance?
A09102	For what more dishonorable infelicity can there be, then that which standeth in Capito Libri of Q. Elizabeths lyfe?
A09102	Had it not bene more plaine dealing to haue alleadged some one sentence, or conclusion contradictory to the other?
A09102	How can he say, that there was no persecution before the powder- treason?
A09102	How can the Apologer defend himself in this place, from willfull exaggeration, and voluntary mistaking?
A09102	How is his voyce contrary to the voyce& sense of all the rest?
A09102	How is this against him?
A09102	How thē doth the Apologer so grosly forget, and contradict himself, euen then, when he goeth about to proue contradictions in his Aduersary?
A09102	If it be vnlawfull, why hath he not expressed any one cause or reason therof?
A09102	Is not Recusancie a cause of Conscience?
A09102	Is not this good dealing?
A09102	Is nothing promised in those wordes to be belieued, or not to be belieued?
A09102	Is this a token of want of better matter, or no?
A09102	Is this good dealing?
A09102	May he, in truth, be said to ● rouch, that an Emperor must be cōtēt to drinke after a Bishops Chaplin?
A09102	No commiseration?
A09102	No compassion?
A09102	Nunquid non omnes portae Inferi?
A09102	Or doth this iustify the Apologers outragious proposition, That Bellarmyne affirmeth Kings to be rather slaues then Lordes?
A09102	Or how doth this shew any such ordinary tricke of falshood in the Cardinal, not in one or two, but in all his citations?
A09102	Or may not we deliuer our Iudges of England, from the cryme of murther, though many mens deathes haue proceeded from them, by way of Iustice?
A09102	Or rather agree they not fitly to the purpose of the Cardinals exhortation, though for breuityes sake he left them out?
A09102	Or why is this submission made?
A09102	Shall he be bound to read all Bellarmynes fiue bookes, to see whether it be true or no?
A09102	The Sonne of such a Mother, as held her selfe much beholden to English Catholicks?
A09102	The second thus: Doth he that taketh it, promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of Religion?
A09102	To take any Oath that the Emperour Charles should propose vnto them?
A09102	Were they not all for lyberty of Conscience?
A09102	What Author can he bring for it, that auoucheth the same?
A09102	What enemy of Christian Religion might not cauill, and calumniate this?
A09102	What fault hath Cardinall Bellarmine heere in alledging the words, and iudgement of S. Chrysostome?
A09102	What i ● he neuer knew of any such attempt?
A09102	What is height of pryde and so ● l ●, i ● this be not?
A09102	What was Nero?
A09102	What would he haue done, or said, if he had bene pressed with an Oath against his Conscience, or any least poynt of his Religion?
A09102	Wherin then, or why are they said to haue submitted themselues?
A09102	Wherin then, or why is this submission, or rather remission to the Emperour, and his iudgmēt?
A09102	Who knoweth not, that the fayrest tytle is put vpon the fowlest matter, when it is to be persuaded or exacted?
A09102	Who seeth not the iniustice of this manner of dealing?
A09102	Who seeth not this violēt inforcemēt?
A09102	Who would not be ashamed of this intemperate accusation?
A09102	Why are M. Blackwell, and M. Charnocke deteyned styll by the L. of Canterbury?
A09102	Why are Recusants punished,& fyned for Recusancy, though they take the Oath of Allegiance?
A09102	Why had he not obiected in like manner, that they expected the libertie of breathing, and vsing the common ayre, as well as Protestants?
A09102	an oppressor, and an Idolatour?
A09102	he had reason to complayne of Catholicks sufferance, or no?
A09102	quid Dioclesianus?
A09102	quid denique iste, quihoc tēpore Ecclesiam persequitur?
A09102	so pretended, so printed, so published, so diuulged to the world?
A09102	tie, acknowledging him to be their liege Lord and King,& inferiour only to god in his Temporall Gouernment?
A09102	what desyre is here descried of calumniation?
A09102	what is he who at this tyme, doth persecute the Church?
A09102	what was Dioclesian?
A20647	11 The blood of the Martyres was the milke which nourished the Primitiue Church, in her infancy, and shall it be too hard for our digestion now?
A20647	112 Where then shall we hope, that these men will stoppe or limit their blasphemies?
A20647	14 And( to proceede farther in Christs Instruction) are these things said of you for Christs sake?
A20647	15 Is there not a Decretall amongst you, by which it Is made Treason to offend a Cardinall?
A20647	18 Was it not Prodigium Obedientiae, as Sedulius iustly calles it, in Fryar Ruffin to go preach naked?
A20647	22 And what is your recompence?
A20647	22 Why therefore shall not the French, and Italian, and olde English lawes giue occasion of Martyrdome in the same cases, as these new lawes shall?
A20647	27 And is there any Charitie in this Doctrine, or in this act of Refusall?
A20647	30 And was not this your case, before the Breues came?
A20647	32 VVhen any of these reasons inuite them, how small causes are sufficient to awake and call vp this temporall Authoritie?
A20647	37 And haue not you beene proceeded with, in Ordinarie course of Iustice, as Traytors, for Rebellions, and Conspiracies, and Tumults?
A20647	38 Or was the Author thereof no good Catholicke?
A20647	38 What high stiles did many Christian and Orthodoxe Emperours assume to themselues?
A20647	42 And is it not a stange precipitation to vow their helpe to all his errours?
A20647	47 If they doe thus much when they are Serui papae, what will they doe when they are famuli?
A20647	5 And is there any matter of Faith in this Decretall?
A20647	9 With how much curiositie and vnescapablenesse their formes of Abiuration vnder oath are exhibited?
A20647	After a dead Dogge, and after a Flea?)
A20647	And are you as sure that there are Breues, as that there is a law?
A20647	And can you produce Authors of any elder times, then within sixe hundred yeares, to haue concurr''d in this?
A20647	And do they which alleadge for the Popes Supremacy ouer Princes, intend the Pope to be Gouernour of all Creatures?
A20647	And how farre, may this courage and libertie carie vs, if the Prince command any thing in detriment of our soule?
A20647	And how hath he decreed it?
A20647	And is there any thing found in either of them, which may be a precedent to this mission?
A20647	And of Inhumanity, when he was sorry, if any body loued him?
A20647	And of desperate prouocation, when he heard of a plague likely to be in those parts, to make a vow to visit those which were infected?
A20647	And of murmuring, when he grudged and grieued, That he could find out no veniall sinne in himselfe?
A20647	And were there not some degrees of spirituall pride in Gonzaga, who is praised because he had a paire of patched hose in Delicijs?
A20647	And what is this Essentiall truth so euident out of Scripture, which designes the Catholique Church?
A20647	And wil they from this argue in Constantine a power, to open and shut hel gates?
A20647	And will they endanger al those Catholique authors to this eternall damnation, which haue violated this Donation of Constantine by publique bookes?
A20647	Are not many of you d parted ● ro ● your promise in baptisme to our Chu ● ch?
A20647	Are you as sure that these Breues, or that any Breues can binde your Conscience in this Case, as you were before, that the law could?
A20647	Are you( if you be called Traytors for refusing the Oath) reproued for anie part of his Commandements?
A20647	At least why should Campian, and those which were executed before these new statutes, be any better Martyres then they?
A20647	Because( saies he) if it were affoorded Christ ● belongs it not to his Church, which is bone of his bone?
A20647	But how shall wee beleeue that these miracles are from God, or that he doth them in testimony of that mans sanctity?
A20647	But to whom shall these men be subiect in the meane time?
A20647	But what?
A20647	By what way then, and at what time came this Authoritie into them, if it were once out?
A20647	Christ appointed twelue, whom hee might send to Preach; but what?
A20647	Did the Popes in their Bulls, intimate any illegitimation, or vsurpation, or touch vpon any such statute?
A20647	Doth he gouerne Sea, and Elements?
A20647	For since the Pope is the Church, how can you diuide the Church from the Court?
A20647	Hee Preached Christ; And what did hee Preach of him?
A20647	How lame then and vnperfect is this spirituall principality, which can affoord but one halfe?
A20647	How man ● Kings are Saints?
A20647	Is it for any of these, that you say, A Clergy man can not be a traytor, though he rebell ● because he is no subiect?
A20647	Is it for hauing established a Primacy vpon that Bishoppe, aboue his fellow Patriarches, which was so long litigious?
A20647	Is not ciuill obedience either really or by intention and implication sworne by euery subiect to the King in his birth, and after?
A20647	Is there any charitie to the Church, or partie, or faction, which you haue in this Kingdom?
A20647	Is there any to your self?
A20647	It was the seede of the Church, out of which we sprung; and shall wee grudge to Tithe our selues to God, in any proportion that hee will accept?
A20647	Not but that they confesse, that there are also some other wayes besides martyrdome to escape Purgatorie; else how got Lypsius so soone to heauen?
A20647	O what spirituall Calenture possesses you, to make this hard shift to destroy your selues?
A20647	Or any part thereof?
A20647	Or d ● d they goe about to aduance the right Heire in the Spanish ● nuasion?
A20647	Or for enriching him with a Patrimony, and Priuiledges almost equall to their owne?
A20647	Or for withdrawing him from the iawes of the Barbarous deuourers of Italy?
A20647	Or must they stay, to aske and obtaine leaue of their Clergie, to depose such a transgressor?
A20647	Or that he ouer whom the Emperour had supreame temporall authority, should haue authority ouer the Emperour in temporall causes?
A20647	So that of this place, that Archbishop of whom I spoke before, exclaimes, who can endure this?
A20647	Thus farre Feuardentius charges vs. 36 And is it not your case also, to for ● ait your Martyrdome vpon the same circumstances?
A20647	To such a one as will be content to resigne, when so euer the other will aske forgiuenesse?
A20647	To what King haue Churches or Altars beene erected?
A20647	Wee therefore repute OTHO Emperour; For, if the Electors would neuer agree, should the Apostolicke Sea alwayes be without a defender?
A20647	What King hath done any miracles?
A20647	What infallible assurance could they haue of this, to excuse them of disobedience in going, or indiscretion in swearing?
A20647	Who would wish S. Henrie the Dane any health, that had seene him, When wormes crawled out of a corrupted Vlcer in his Knee, put them in againe?
A20647	and haue these two Breues made your case to differ so much from his, that that which was lawfull to him, may not be so to you?
A20647	and may not the Pope as well Canonize the whole Spanish Fleete, which perished in 88. for your Catholique faith, and Ecclesiastique immunitie?
A20647	and that he refused to put on a paire of old bootes, because a worshipfull man had worne them?
A20647	and that when his handes did cleaue with colde, he would put on no gloues?
A20647	how durst hee say, that this kissing of the popes feete, was established in saint Luke, when the sinner kissed Christs feete?
A20647	or did those which vndertooke for you, euer intend this forsaking?
A20647	or doe they thinke that the will and commandements of God are deriued to vs onely by the way of the Pope?
A20647	or hath the blood of any men executed by those lawes, died your Martyrologes with any Rubriques?
A20647	or this, That it is better to sinne against God, then our spirituall Father, because he can reconcile vs to God, but no body to him?
A20647	or was the way of the right Heire Catholiquely prepared by Dolemans booke?
A20647	wil you so, in obeying him, disobey him,& swallow his conclusions,& yet accuse his fashiō of prouing them?
A31234	About Q. Maries Persecution, and whether she or the Reformed Government, spilt most Blood for Religion?
A31234	And for Rebellion and Tumults, they have been eminent in Poland, Boheme, Hungary, France, Germany?
A31234	And how can a simple Heretick tell, whether it call you to pray, or to eat Fish?
A31234	And lastly, could any Publican Lollard, Wickliffian, or new Sect stir, but the whole Kingdom presently detested them?
A31234	And now he asks, What our Country men did or suffered for it?
A31234	And who can be guiltless, if assertions without any shadow of proof shall be received against him?
A31234	As some wicked mē dealt ill with Gods Anointed; so on the other side, who defended these Princes against pretended illegal impositions of Rome?
A31234	Besides, have not many Catholiques also suffered for believing the Pope to be Head of the Church?
A31234	But besides, how extravagant is that beginning?
A31234	But how impudent is the Minister, to say, we were never in trouble, as he knows, for this?
A31234	But let it not displease you( Men Brethren, and Fathers) if we ask whether Ulisses be no better known?
A31234	But let it not displease( Men, Brethren, and Fathers) if we ask whether Ulysses be no better known?
A31234	But now my Minister will nimbly demand, Is not this accusing the King, and blaming the whole Parliament for their Advice and Counsel?
A31234	But suppose he was as eminent and faithful as Bedin field, Jerningham,& c. Must that excuse a man from being fairly tried for Treason?
A31234	But the Minister says, What is all this to England, where Prince and people are Protestants?
A31234	But the Minister urges, if the Papists thought Queen Elizabeth an Usurper, why did not they stir sooner?
A31234	But what do you drive at by Throgmortons usage?
A31234	But what made this mad man ask where we were in all those weak efforts of gaspink Loyalty?
A31234	But what was this to the Q. of Scots?
A31234	But why do I go to the particulars of this notorious Rebellion?
A31234	But why does this poor Minister continually harp upon James Clement, whom the Divel had seduced for this work?
A31234	But would not a man now think this Minister had abused us sufficiently?
A31234	But, pray, what is the Frenchman to us, had he been Papist?
A31234	But, suppose Jesuites were Villains; what is that to the Catholick Faith?
A31234	By this Argument then, if the Parliament should make it Treason( as who knows but they may?)
A31234	Can Thuanus, or any man else, look upon that action with more horrour then I?
A31234	Can any thing touch men of Honour more, then after the loss of so many Lives and Estates, insultingly to have it said, It was but your Duty?
A31234	Can we chuse but be dismay''d( when all things fail) that extravagant Crimes are fathered on us?
A31234	Can we chuse but be dismay''d( when all things fail) that extravagant Crimes are fathered on us?
A31234	Could there be a more frightful sight, then to see the whole English World on a sudden, point and cry, Fie on them, Fie on them?
A31234	Did I ever say otherwise, then that the Protestants were to be honoured for their wonderful service to the King?
A31234	Did Queen Mary ask his consent?
A31234	Did any Pope send in this manner to Edward the Sixth?
A31234	Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass- Bell, for that which calls to Dinner; or a Sequestrator glad to be affronted being Constable?
A31234	Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass- Bell, for that which calls to Dinner?
A31234	Does he find any such record in our Histories?
A31234	Doubtless he means some Hugonot Minister: for what Cavalier was ever in France, and knows not how those Saints adored Cromwel?
A31234	Had not we three times more Estates sold then any people else?
A31234	Had our Priests any power in England?
A31234	Has the Indiscretion of some few incenst you?
A31234	Has the Indiscretion of some few incenst you?
A31234	Have we not been all of the same Party, or can there he named a Papist that was not for the King, even in te worst of times?
A31234	Have we not seen that( for the safety of Religion) Edward the Sixth gave away by the advice of his Councel the Kingdom to Jane Gray?
A31234	Have we not seen, Good Reader, that such ridiculous Stories as these have lately ruined the Kingdom?
A31234	He farther says, what could the Parliament do less, then invite the People to bring in their grievances to the place of Redress?
A31234	Here he asks what may that be?
A31234	Here he asks, Who thought so?
A31234	How childishly rediculous is this Ministers Allegation, That none of us suffered but by known Laws?
A31234	How commonly is it said, That the Oath of renouncing their Religion is intended for these?
A31234	How commonly is it said, That the Oath of renouncing their Religion is intended for these?
A31234	How did Tenants begin to confront their Landlords?
A31234	How often have we seen it in the narrow places of London?
A31234	I would fain know, if the Clergy and Religious were since ever more in power then in those days?
A31234	If it be lawful, why might not Papists put to death men( who they thought deserved it) as well as Protestants?
A31234	If remedies were needful, what Medicament could be better applied then the gentle balm of true perswasion?
A31234	If then a woe be pronounc''d against such, what will become of them that asperse his Members?
A31234	In the next place, let me know whether a man may be executed for this Tenets in Religion, or no?
A31234	In this sort who have ever suffered more then we?
A31234	Is it to excuse the two unheard of 〈 ◊ 〉 that he tell; me of four or five Kings since the Conquest made away by Papists?
A31234	Is not this pretty, that no body died in England for Religion, but for Treason?
A31234	Is this a blemish to the Cavaliers in general?
A31234	Is this proportionable, Good Reader?
A31234	It may be they were not sorry in their hearts: For what men are so at the death of their Enemies?
A31234	Might not then a man modestly say, that Popery governed the civilized World, when it governed the whole World?
A31234	Now who is it( having read less then the first six Books of Euclid) but can demonstrate that this is not altogether exact?
A31234	Now, I beseech you, Reader( having read the Apology through) what injury has any good man done him by it?
A31234	Now, Reader, let me ask you when will the business of our times be ripe for History?
A31234	Of the Papist''s that leave their Religion,& why?
A31234	Or a Sequestrator be glad to be affronted being Constable?
A31234	Or did they mistrust( in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home, because they were of this Profession?
A31234	Or lastly, which of all our Kings used to entreat his favour to be Crowned?
A31234	Or shall my Lord Douglas and his brave Scots be left to their shifts, who scorn''d to receive Wages of those that have declared War against England?
A31234	Or who is it, that says the Swedes ar inhumane, because none except L ● therans shall live among them?
A31234	Or who knows not of the Appeals from Africk, when matters of moment arose, even in the most acknowledged Primitive times?
A31234	Or who told us when Cromwel lived, Be gone, you are no friends to Caesar?
A31234	Or why did K. James put to death b Legat and Wightman, but because he religiously thought it was unfit they should longer live to blaspheme?
A31234	Or, shall my Lord Douglas and his brave Scots be left to their shifts; who scorn''d to receive Wages of those that have declared War against England?
A31234	Or, when the Question arose?
A31234	Pray what advantage has this Minister got by loading us with crimes, of which we are innocent?
A31234	Pray, Master Parson, let me ask you, Whether Laws in all places are executed by inferiour Officers, according to the intent of the Legislator?
A31234	Pray, Reader, to speak moderately, is not this man the archest wrangler that ever was?
A31234	Pray, Reader, what is in this Answer that confutes the Apology?
A31234	Shall Notions then convince Experience, when as Demonstration it self often gives way to Practice?
A31234	Suppose, Reader, this were true, that a design was recommended to the prayers of the Catholicks, what were they guilty of by it?
A31234	Tell me then, where is the Temporal advantage of Reformation?
A31234	The proposal by the Minister is this: Whether if the Queen of Scots had been a Protestant, we should have stickled for her?
A31234	Then he asks us, where we were from that time forward, in all those weak efforts of a gasping Loyalty?
A31234	Then he asks when it was that we governed the civilized World?
A31234	These are they that by beginning with us, Murthered their Prince, and wounded you: And shall the same method continue by your approbation?
A31234	These are they, that by beginning with us, murthered their Prince, and wounded you: And shall the same Method continue by your approbation?
A31234	These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home, and shall they then be forgotten by You?
A31234	These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home, and shall they then he forgotten by You?
A31234	Was ever man so impudent as to deny this?
A31234	Was it not strange in the beginning, to behold c Abbies destroyed, Bishopricks gelded, Chanteries, Hospitals and Colledges turned to profane uses?
A31234	Was not Godliness, Godliness, the cry of all the Saints?
A31234	Was not the Apology directed to them?
A31234	Were not Priests of all Orders hanged?
A31234	Were not we where the rest of the Royal party were?
A31234	Were they not forced to skulk always in holes, and hanged as often as taken?
A31234	What Preacher preacht this in the days of old?
A31234	What a Volume might there be here writ, if every matter mentioned were to be fully discust?
A31234	What advātage will Persecutiō bring, but to make us glory that we suffer for Christ?
A31234	What could now destroy our hopes with this gratious Prince, but a seming Plot against his Life and Line?
A31234	What does he mean?
A31234	What does the Minister mean by Protestants known, and no liberty given?
A31234	What have we done, that we should now deserve your Anger?
A31234	What have we done, that we should now deserve your Anger?
A31234	What is the meaning of this distinction, That many of my Church were not of my Party?
A31234	What is this to our Religion, more then if the King of Spain should make use ▪ of the Politicks too far?
A31234	What is''t then, I beseech you( were the fact proved against me) I have committed, that Protestant Authors have not done and worse?
A31234	What reason has the Minister to say I could ▪ name no other Country But France, where Protestants have open Churches?
A31234	What scoffing Blasphemies did the Seditious utter?
A31234	What shall I say then to such a man, who will yet affirm our Principles inconsistent with Obedience?
A31234	What thoughts can men have when they find not themselves opprest, but the publick interest of their Country?
A31234	Whether Papists die in England for their Conscience or for Treason?
A31234	Whether Papists twice converted England from Paganism?
A31234	Whether Popish or Protestant Governments are kinder to their dissenting Subjects?
A31234	Whether Protestant Princes are more absolute then the Popish?
A31234	Whether their General Councils, Decretals and Divines teach Papists Rebellion and deposing Kings?
A31234	Whither Papist''s caus''d the war in the three Kingdomes?
A31234	Whither Papist''s govern''d the civiliz''d world?
A31234	Who is ignorant that that Great man our General( whose memory all ages shall for ever honor) concealed at first what he had long determined?
A31234	Who is it, Reader, that having read History is ignorant of the great power the Bishop of Rome had over the East, as the Greek Fathers tell us?
A31234	Who is it, that morally blames the Moors of Affrick( being of one Profession) for keeping out even the Gospel it self?
A31234	Who then will ever believe a word more he says, when he is so strangely impudent to no purpose?
A31234	Who therefore, My Lords and Gentlemen, will be so little pitied as you, if you should be twice deceived after the same method and māner?
A31234	Who would now think that a man could be so abominable as to lay such a thing to our charge without any proof at all?
A31234	Why do not the Kings of France, Spain, Portugal and Poland see this?
A31234	Why does this Gentleman say, we never knew the Laws executed?
A31234	Why may not we, Noble Country- men, hope for favour from you, as well as the French Protestants find from theirs?
A31234	Why may not we, Noble Country- men, hope for favour from you, as well as the French Protestants find from theirs?
A31234	Will you never leave perverting History, or at best betraying your own ignorance?
A31234	Would not this Logick then make the whole Church of England guilty of Phanatick Principles, because Dr. Taylor writ for liberty of Prophesie?
A31234	Your misdemeanors?
A31234	],[ London?
A31234	and can any man believe if they once come in fashion again, they will end with Papists?
A31234	and have I not always declared, that his Majesty ows as much to them, as ever Prince can owe to Subjects?
A31234	and if Queen Elizabeth had not been thought illegitimate, whether nevertheless we had not rebelled against her?
A31234	and were not the Laws put in force, so that to those that had something, two parts of it were also swept away?
A31234	and who of us in his Majesties absence had not estimation among the rest of the Cavaliers, according to his ranck and quality?
A31234	condemn so many Hereticks in their time?
A31234	for if he dares disown a thing which all men know, how will he then cavil, do you think, at what is known but only to the Wise?
A31234	for what man of our Party did not faithfully serve the King to his power?
A31234	has he forgot Poland, even Crakaw it self, where theire Orthodox Socinian Cathechism was made?
A31234	how often in the Paper- houses of Charing Cross, the Strand?
A31234	how often in the ill- building of Kings- street?
A31234	must Cambridge be Babylon, and the English Religion false, because the Mēbers of one Colledge( suppose Emanuel) were thought knaves and hypocrites?
A31234	or did they mistrust( in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home because they were of this Profession?
A31234	or who is it that contemns not a Frenchman whilst he is an Enemy to England?
A31234	the Royal Party?
A31234	was ever any thing so evident, as that the Rebels deemed all Papists Cavaliers, and all Cavaliers Papists?
A31234	was there any Party in England more deprest then we?
A31234	was there ever more of Pilgrimages and all sorts of Devotion, which Protestants call Superstitious?
A31234	were not Schoolmen then most in their splendor?
A31234	were not others imprisoned during life?
A31234	were they not Papists?
A07817	( excepting the examples of Knox, Buchanan, Goodman, Munster, which all I iustly condemned) which was not directlie confuted?
A07817	107 But why should it be thought a matter incredible that such a dismall, and as it were disastrous end should befall a Pope?
A07817	111 I haue alleged the latter, P. R. hath opposed the former; both of vs haue affirmed a truth: where then is the falshood?
A07817	21 What haue I sayd, which I haue not prooued?
A07817	24 Venture my credit, Sir?
A07817	33 Say you so P. R.?
A07817	45 SAy( P. R.) what is your mentall Equiuocation?
A07817	53 And where is now P. R. his boast of Scriptures, Fathers, Reasons?
A07817	84 In my book of m Satisfaction I had this passage, concerning an obiection against some Protestants, answering, Deny Christs to be God?
A07817	85 A seuenth, in changing an interrogation[ Haue you any thing to say to their practise?]
A07817	A second obiection of falshood, whereupon hee insulteth thus: This false Lad setteth downe his owne fiction: and is not this perfidious dealing?
A07817	A tenth obiection of falshood, with this insultation: Is not this rather falshood than folly?
A07817	Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth?
A07817	An eleuenth obiection of falshood, with this insultation: How can this malicious cauilling Minister expect to bee trusted heereafter?
A07817	And are these contrary?
A07817	And are these contrary?
A07817	And can P. R. suspect any hypocrisie in the letter d?
A07817	And can now P. R. call a Confutation a Confession without a grosse abuse of the confidence of his Reader, and his own conscience?
A07817	And can one truth shoulder out another?
A07817	And can there be a greater contradiction than this?
A07817	And could any say thus but a lier?
A07817	And could our Mitigator shew himselfe a more egregious Preuaricator than thus?
A07817	And could this deserue so rigorous a censure of impudent impietie, and whatsoeuer bitternesse the gall of this man could vent out?
A07817	And doe you see this follie?
A07817	And is it so Sir Thomas?
A07817	And is not this a passing treacherie, trow wee?
A07817	And is not this good policie?
A07817	And is not this notable dissimulation in a matter so cleere and euident?
A07817	And is not this perfidious dealing?
A07817	And is there heere any word peculiar of a Protestant Prince, or of his successour?
A07817	And must it therefore be rather translated, shed?
A07817	And shall not Protestants( except they will acknowledge themselues to haue deserued a new Massacre) call this your doctrine execrable and rebellious?
A07817	And then how could these words be reprehensible in M. R. which are warrantable by S. Peter?
A07817	And was not this a piece of fine fraud?
A07817	And what can be more 〈 ◊ 〉 vrged than this?
A07817	And what els?
A07817	And what then?
A07817	And where now is the assurance of his vpright conscience protested to his Maiestie in his Epistle Dedicatorie?
A07817	And why may not this example fit?
A07817	And why not?
A07817	And will euer any man credit T. M. any more in any thing that he alledgeth, when this consciencelesse falsification is once discouered in him?
A07817	And will you stand to it& lose your credit, if this be falsly and calumniously alleged?
A07817	Are not these Rogationists and you Romanists equally bent to like mischiefe?
A07817	Are they not both true?
A07817	But I pray you P. R. can Apostata Princes be excepted, where All Princes and Emperonrs are included?
A07817	But I pray you Sir, what is there in Historiographers of after times but only case of report?
A07817	But I( alas) what shall I say?
A07817	But can you finde no more Protestants of this opinion,( to wit, besides M. Willet, and D. Fulke?)
A07817	But how will P. R. now vse mee vpon this aduantage?
A07817	But some will say, in so manifestly impudence how can any argument of modestie appeare?
A07817	But what if one of the souldiers had replied to him thus?
A07817	But what now will follow of all this?
A07817	But who may attempt the execution heereof?
A07817	But why had he not adioined also, that if he were carelesse of his flocke, then Gregory must bee his name, which importeth a vigilant Pastor?
A07817	But why is this impudency?
A07817	But will you know the best way to prooue your Aduersarie T. M. slanderous?
A07817	Can any thing bee more fraudulently alleged?
A07817	Can there be a more grieuous accusation than this?
A07817	Can there be any falshood in the particle Of?
A07817	Can this be done but of purpose, and consequently by a guiltie conscience?
A07817	Can this be ignorance?
A07817	Can this his taxation of falshood be thought true?
A07817	Can you extract such a generall consequent out of the confession of the Minister?
A07817	Common sense( sayth hee) might haue replied( to the souldiers) What could you tell what was done when you were asleepe?
A07817	Could any by- stander containe laughter, to heare such a senslesse exception as this?
A07817	Could that errour be by errour of Print, diuersitie of translation, or difference of Editions?
A07817	Did he euer acknowledge your mentall Aequiuocation so vniuersall, as you make it, of all Vniuersities, Schooles, Diuines, Casuists?
A07817	Did your fellow answer Learnedly?
A07817	Doth the man( who maketh mention of his* Interruption by sicknesse) know what he hath now sayd?
A07817	Editions?
A07817	For I am accused to haue vsed that interrogation[ Haue you any thing to say vnto their practise?]
A07817	Furthermore bee alwaies echoing out against him some opprobrious termes, as Mountbanck, Grashopper, Malitious, shamelesse, false, and what not?
A07817	Had we not now reason to expect as absolute a Syllogisme as all his wit, art, and industrie could inuent?
A07817	Hath he any shadow of excuse by ignorance of the Authour and place?
A07817	How then can my assertion be thought slanderous, which necessary consequence of reason prooueth to bee too true?
A07817	How then could our Mitigator affirme, That mentall aequiuocation is defended of Casuists and Doctors, and contradicted by none?
A07817	I concluded thus; Wee haue heard of their opinions, haue you any thing to except against their practise?
A07817	In effect confessed all that was opposed?
A07817	Is it because Otto Frisingensis is cited contrarie to his meaning?
A07817	Is it possible that my Aduersary can free himselfe from a falsitie corroding the conscience?
A07817	Is it the Minor?
A07817	Is not this singular falshood?
A07817	Is not your Defence( P. R.) Miluus& Columbus, A Kitish Doue?
A07817	Is the Citie safe?
A07817	Is the Interiection But in this repetition like a theefe by the way to seduce and robbe, and is not rather as a true man to direct thee?
A07817	Is this a Catholike Mitigation?
A07817	Is this it?
A07817	Is this the assurance of his vpright conscience, whereof he braggeth so much?
A07817	Is this to confesse a generallitie?
A07817	It is not altogether impertinent?
A07817	It is not impossible, good: For why?
A07817	Morton now to say to this against vs?
A07817	Morton to make?
A07817	Mortons out of Lambertus against Pope Hildebrand, who is by them so highly commended, as you haue heard, and his aduersaries condemned?
A07817	Must it be euen so then P. R?
A07817	Nay did I not expresly say, that I would pay thee foure Nobles?
A07817	Nay did not he k confute this your assertion of generalitie by the expresse sentence of your owne Doctour Genesius Sepulueda?
A07817	Nay rather doth he not seeke to iniurie me with falshood?
A07817	Now if there bee a fault in a peece of cloth, must we necessarily iudge that the spinner was to blame?
A07817	Now then what a notable Critick haue I met withall, whom euery goodwife is able to conuince of idle dottage?
A07817	Of which kind P. R. will prooue himselfe to be; for what excuse may he now vse to free himselfe from falshood?
A07817	Or is not this an Assertion fit for one of those Doctours, whereof S. Paul talketh, that vnderstand not what they say, nor whereof they affirme?
A07817	Or will you say that Answer was vntrue?
A07817	Or will you thinke it rather follie than falshood, that could not discerne betweene verò and verè?
A07817	Or, could it be called then vniuersall, when but one man set it first abroch?
A07817	Otherwise, I must expostulate with them according to the Apostles example:* Am I your enemie, because I tell you the truth?
A07817	Otherwise, answer your Aduersaries sincerely vnto this their Interrogatorie; Did you euer spare vs, being sufficiently able to hurt vs?
A07817	Prints?
A07817	SAint Cyprian saith, 1 Whence is this tradition?
A07817	Say then( good P. R.) seeing both these two are true, can one of them be a lie?
A07817	Say therfore: was that answer of your fellow true, wherin it is said, that diuers Catholikes do not allow of this doctrine of aequiuocation?
A07817	Shall excuse him by diuersitie of Editions?
A07817	Shall hee feare any ambush in this clause?
A07817	Shall that by- stander be therefore thought euer after vnworthie of all credit?
A07817	Shall we know the cause?
A07817	Si latrones, si bestiae, cùm irruu ● t, omni iure expugnantur, cur non tyrānus quouis latrone& bestiâ deterior?
A07817	Such( alas) is the case of all them& c.] Doe you see how substantially he hath prooued this matter?
A07817	The second deceit is wilfull leauing out of the first words of the Authour, Sed quid dices si iuraui?
A07817	The woman is asked( saith T. M.) sold you the land for so much?
A07817	Then the Iustice of Peace replieth, How know you that P. R. did it, you being then asleepe?
A07817	There is but one, that is, there is no other Edition in the world?
A07817	Translations?
A07817	Vnde est haec traditio?
A07817	Vnder what visard then could he call a perfect manifestation of this obiection a dissimulation?
A07817	Was it negligence or ignorance?
A07817	Was it then the Synod of Constantinople, that was condemned in the Councell of Francford, and not the second Synode of Nice?
A07817	What excuse can he pretend?
A07817	What excuse may be admitted in this place?
A07817	What excuse now shall P. R. make?
A07817	What is the difference?
A07817	What is there in all this Syllogisme which Doleman alias Parsons, can denie to be his Assertion?
A07817	What may the Hearer beleeue of all he sayth, when euery where he is found intangled with such foolish treachery?
A07817	What now?
A07817	What reioynder would our Minister make?
A07817	What shall we then thinke of P. R. but as of the man, who had purposed with himselfe either to scorne Protestants, or else to betray his Catholikes?
A07817	What therefore?
A07817	What will now P. R. doe, after that this his montanous boast of A true Syllogisme hath brought foorth this ridiculous mouse?
A07817	Where is his naked innocencie?
A07817	Where is his naked innocencie?
A07817	Where is his simplicitie in Christ Iesus?
A07817	Where is his simplicitie in Christ Iesus?
A07817	Where is his vpright conscience?
A07817	Where is that which was called the Common answer?
A07817	Where then is the sinceritie of this mans conscience?
A07817	Wherein now haue I wronged my conscience?
A07817	Who can beleeue this Minister heereafter?
A07817	Who would not thinke but that the man were very skilfull in that Art, wherein he presumeth to giue such a censure?
A07817	Why so?
A07817	Why who are you, and where is your abode, tell me?
A07817	Will euer any man credit T. M. heereafter?
A07817	Will he not be ashamed to see himselfe conuinced of so great and shamelesse ouerlashing?
A07817	Will he say, that it was an error of ignorance, ouersight, negligence?
A07817	Will he thinke the accusation is false, because of the addition of But?
A07817	Will hee then denie the Ergo or Conclusion?
A07817	Will now our P. R. call Surius, Furius,( who hath published the bodie of Councels) and annihilate all his credit heereafter?
A07817	Will you cite Protestants for confessing such Doctrines as ancient, which they condemne to haue beene superstitious?
A07817	Would P. R. if he heard this, pronounce this fellow vnguiltie?
A07817	Would not by- standers either laugh at him, as at a lunatike, or else suspect him for a cosening cheater?
A07817	[ Common sense( sayth Thomas Morton) might haue replied, How could you tell what was done when you were asleepe?
A07817	an ex dominica autoritate descendens, an de Apostolorum mandatis& epistolis?
A07817	by Fathers?
A07817	can any excuse him from falshood and malice in so open treachery?
A07817	did he not commend B. for valour and bountie?
A07817	doth it not speake also indifferently of all sorts of religion, of what side soeuer the truth be?
A07817	if they did, then where was the faith of Bellarmine and Baronius, who say it did not erre in question of faith?
A07817	ignorance, negligence?
A07817	ignorance, ouersight, negligence?
A07817	is it deriued from the Lords authority, or from the precept of the Apostles?
A07817	is my shield sound?
A07817	is this the assurance of his vpright conscience whereof hee braggeth to his Maiesty?
A07817	it was condemned?
A07817	may he not say heereafter, I was ashamed, and therefore I hid my selfe?
A07817	nay doth not the Text speake plainely of making a King, where none is?
A07817	nay, where is this man P. R. himselfe, the new select Aduocate for this cause?
A07817	numquid clypeus meus integer?
A07817	or a full answer vnto euery obiected exception a concealement, as though nothing had beene reprehended?
A07817	or a particular repetition and satisfaction to all, an hypocriticall dealing, as though there had beene nothing obiected at all?
A07817	or by his owne Doctors?
A07817	or by sensible reasons?
A07817	or can any man excuse him from falshood and malice in this open treacherie?
A07817	or how may any thinke, that he writeth from his conscience, seeing him vse such grosse shifts and falshoods in so important a matter?
A07817	s But I say it is a truth, because the speech agreeth with the mind of the speaker,& c. How now would my Reader heare this noble Equiuocator confuted?
A07817	sayd the Herald so?
A07817	shall it be edition, print, translation?
A07817	then is he no Mitigator: would he iustifie his accuser?
A07817	what amends will P. R. make?
A07817	what will P. R. obiect?
A07817	where is his appeale vnto both our Vniuersities?
A07817	where is his challenge of Canonists and Schoole- diuines?
A07817	where is his naked innocency?
A07817	where is his simplicity in Christ Iesus?
A07817	where is his vpright conscience?
A07817	whether he spoke this being in his feauer- fit, or in temper?
A07817	whether in a dreame, or awake?
A07817	whether in his right minde, or in distraction?
A07817	who shall plead my cause?
A07817	who?
A07807	& Bernardus ad Episcopum Senonensem idem colligit,[ Omnis anima] tum vestra, inquit, quis vos excipit?
A07807	& c. And can any man of conscience deny the conclusion?
A07807	& qui non Graeci?
A07807	* Propheta, cùm art,[ Vt euellas,& c.] Quid horum fastum sonat?
A07807	* Vt iugulent homines surgunt de nocte Latrones: vt teipsum serues non expergisceris?
A07807	2. h Potuitnè Thomas apertius damnare istorum sententiam, qui docent fas esse Reo crimen verum sibi intentum arte verborum inficiari?
A07807	216. f Vultis in Regno Galliae Christianissimo Regem proclamare Nauarraeū Caluinistam?
A07807	28. i Quis te docuit tàm bellè nugari?
A07807	3. m Apostolis interdicitur dominatus; ergo aut tu vsurpare audi aut dominans Apostolatum, aut Apostolus dominatum?
A07807	34. b An nos frangimusianuam, cum effractoribas suribus, quia, si non cā clauderemus, illi non frangerant?
A07807	4. d In quos vestiûm populum, exaest ● antem contra vos, insurgere sollicitauimus?
A07807	466. g Illi nè clament Viue Rex, quē ne salutare possint, nec in domum suam recipere?
A07807	6. d Dicit aliquis, ergonè Rahab melius fecisset, si nullam misericordiam hospitibus prestitisset nolēdo mentiri?
A07807	6. orbem terrarum partitus, insulasque noui orbis Arragonum Regi einsque haeredibus donauit, vt ex eius diplomate patet?
A07807	9. a Ecce graui morbo periclitatur aegrotus; cuius vires ferre non possunt, si ei mors vnici& charissimi filij sui nunciaretur: quid respondebis?
A07807	A matter notorious: and how( I pray you) may we better, then by the doctrine of your Generals, know what is your generall doctrine?
A07807	Acts( I say) de futuris of things to come, as namely, of fidelitie, loyaltie, sanctitie hereafter to be performed?
A07807	After this came in his wife, ignorant of that which was done; and Peter sayd vnto her, Tell me, Sold you the land for so much?
A07807	Againe, who was it that would haue killed the now p King of Fraunce with a knife?
A07807	All this is very semblable, for who could be more fit to commend this Aequiuocation, a piece of blacke art, than Blackewell?
A07807	And can any by any wilfull lie deceiue his owneselfe, as thereby be made ignorant of his owne meaning?
A07807	And do not the most of that sort canonize in their conceits all such Popish ones, as haue bene executed for treasons?
A07807	And doth not the Gospell it selfe tell vs the same likewise?
A07807	And he that killed your last King Henry the third, I meane your Monke Clemens, had he no affinitie with a Priest?
A07807	And is not this a safe case for our Soueraigne, trow ye?
A07807	And is there any King which feareth God, that can call this exposition rebellious?
A07807	And shall not your voice, I am no Priest, which can not possibly expresse( that which you are) a Priest, be a lying voice?
A07807	And shall we dare to remooue* The ancient Land- markes of our forefathers?
A07807	And shall we thinke the French Kings to exceed our English herei ●?
A07807	And was not this his fugere, plainly your subterfugere?
A07807	And what matter can there be wherein such a Priest will not aequiuocate, who doth aequiuocate concerning his Priesthood?
A07807	And what of this?
A07807	And who( I pray you) did commend and magnifie that your Clemens his desperate exploite?
A07807	And why was not that[ vt vobis significem] at this time also seasonable for them to vnderstand?
A07807	And why?
A07807	And will you make him guilty of more than Heathenish Aequiuocation?
A07807	And will you say now therefore that Christ did aequiuocate, that is, delude and deceiue his Disciples?
A07807	And yet in like case against the secular state obiect Gods prouidence: said I like?
A07807	Apostolus nisi Principes& magistratus vocat?
A07807	Are all Magistrates in England reputed of your Equiuocators competent Iudges?
A07807	As though in warre onely the figh ● ing souldiers were enemies: doth not Reason in the Apologue teach you the contrarie?
A07807	But how do you satisfie for Hildebrand?
A07807	But how if he be not excommunicate by name?
A07807	But how?
A07807	But lingua, quo vadis?
A07807	But notwithstanding this direct command[ Thou shalt sweare] wilt thou sweare?
A07807	But shall one dramme of drosse prooue the whole masse no golde?
A07807	But thou wilt say, then truth shall be a murtherer: why?
A07807	But were Protestants after this rebellious?
A07807	But what can we expect from you, Patrons of lying equiuocation, but in your accusations against Protestants equiuocating lies?
A07807	But what doe you professe to prooue?
A07807	But what if Kings will not inthrall themselues to the Popes authoritie?
A07807	But what kind of motion might this be in those Catholikes which egged them on to this butcherie?
A07807	But what say you generally for Priests?
A07807	But what thinke you?
A07807	But what was the right cause of tumults?
A07807	But when?
A07807	But whereunto shall I compare this generation?
A07807	But why?
A07807	But you will say that then they would haue slaine her and haue sought out the strangers: doth it therefore follow that they should find them?
A07807	But, it may be he is ignorant; will no ignorance excuse him?
A07807	But, you, lately whose deaths haue you not conspired?
A07807	By what law?
A07807	By whom are they freed?
A07807	Can any moderate spirit call this doctrine rebellious?
A07807	Can conscience beare witnesse?
A07807	Can the one of these be saued by the other mans halter?
A07807	Can then any without blasphemy defend the cause of the God of all iustice and truth with a lie?
A07807	Can then your vnknowen Reseruation haue approbation by S. Augustine?
A07807	Can you be contented to vnderstand the true causes of those mischiefes?
A07807	Can you then apply the sentence of holy Ambrose to this order?
A07807	Christianae imminet,& vbi nou ● s hostis viget, multò quàm Turea infestior, eò potiùs cursum conuertere oportet?
A07807	Common sense might haue replied, How could you tell what was done when you were all asleepe?
A07807	Cur Leo tertius Carolum Magnum Imperatorem constituit?
A07807	Dare you appeale vnto Logicke?
A07807	Dauid sweareth also, but what?
A07807	Deny Christ to be God?
A07807	Did I not alledge also your most famous Iesuite Gregorie of Valentia for confirmation thereof?
A07807	Did euer Ieremie put downe Kings to root them out?
A07807	Do not Ministers preach publikely, and people also professe the contrarie?
A07807	Do you esteeme any competent and fit, who are Aduersaries to your Romish profession?
A07807	Do you then make all Kings in Christendome subiect to the Emperor?
A07807	Do you thinke it immoderate?
A07807	Doth not the King and whole state enact lawes, and Magistrates execute them to ruinate your Babel?
A07807	Doth your Protestant witnesse call them Rebellious Gospellers?
A07807	Du ● st these Enginers do anie such thing without direction from their priests?
A07807	Esto Propheta, sed nunquid plusquam Propheta?
A07807	Father Parsons( in his Dolman) a principall Rector in the Seminarie at Rome?
A07807	For what?
A07807	For when your Leo Pope as* Taking eares to be hornes, shall iudge truths to be errors, what shall then become of innocents?
A07807	God forbid: but to be God of God only in a particular sence, this indeed they do; but can you finde no more Protestants of this opinion?
A07807	Haue Popes prerogatiue ouer Kings in causes temporall, as of autority to depose them?
A07807	Haue you any thing to except against their practise?
A07807	Haue you no Father to father your aequiuocating lie vpon, but only Saint Gregory?
A07807	Haue you sayd?
A07807	Haue you* One God in Dan, and another in Bethel?
A07807	How can you free your selfe from this ielousie, seeing your doctrine is in protestation of not aequiuocating to aequiuocate?
A07807	How like you this doctrine of Luther?
A07807	How shall his Maiesty be perswaded that these words without all aequiuocation are not spoken in some doubtfull sense and aequiuocation?
A07807	How so?
A07807	How then?
A07807	How will you therefore excuse your selues?
A07807	How?
A07807	Howsoeuer, who are we that we should censure or limit the power of God?
A07807	If it were vniust, why was it i not repealed?
A07807	If the case be otherwise, what Quacksaluers be you to offer a salue which can not possibly cure the sore?
A07807	If the verity of God haue more abounded through my lie vnto his glory, why do we not euill that good may come thereof?
A07807	In his true sence, say you?
A07807	Is it bodily?
A07807	Is it not as easie for you to turne Iubet, to an i d est, prohibet?
A07807	Is it not so?
A07807	Is the cause of vs Protestants the same, and shall we be subiect to contrarie Tribunals?
A07807	Is this modestie?
A07807	Is this the true sense of that Prophecie?
A07807	Is this to pray for vs, and not to prey altogether vpon vs?
A07807	It may be, some do but doubtingly defend it; what will you iudge of these?
A07807	It was the demaund of an whole State for defence of their countrie priuiledge; can any Papist call this rebellious?
A07807	Iubet?
A07807	King Iames or our late Queene Tyrants?
A07807	Let vs grant?
A07807	May it be lawfull for vs to aske you by what law this temporall is assumed?
A07807	May it now please your sacred Maiestie, to see how exactly they imitate Souldiers in their march?
A07807	May this kind of aequiuocating be vsed man oath?
A07807	Me thinke I heare our Aequiuocators say, what, no true answer but only he is dead?
A07807	No Papist doth iudge any Protestant an Heretike or excommunicate to your knowledge?
A07807	No: then was not his oath a veritate, from truth; But did his oath( the second propertie of a true oath) confirme a truth?
A07807	Nonnè potuit dicere, scio vbi sint, sed Deum timeo, eos prodere?
A07807	Notwithstanding we acknowledge her successiō iust: and after the proclamation of her title, shew vs what Protestant euer resisted?
A07807	Now how is it in this your controuersie?
A07807	Now let me be beholden vnto you for an Answer, whether that all Protestants of all conditions do not renounce your Romish Religion?
A07807	Now then did your Pope Pius erre in excommunicating, and so in condemning an innocent?
A07807	Now therefore what a case am I in?
A07807	Now what man of common sense doth not know the sense of such speeches?
A07807	Now who are you?
A07807	Otherwise how is it, that you dare contest g For all Catholikes, not to refuse an oath of allegeance according to the iust proceeding of law?
A07807	Quid ad me de his qui foras sunt iudicare?
A07807	R. Yea I know it: Q. Wherewith doe you know it?
A07807	S. Augustine resolued that the Bishops answer was most honest: what wil our Aequiuocators iudge?
A07807	Satisfie vs yet in one question more: Suppose that the Protestant Prince haue a iust quarrell, what then?
A07807	Say now( moderate Answerer) will your modestie giue your face leaue to blush at this doctrine of your Cardinall?
A07807	Say now, do you thinke his Admonition tollerable?
A07807	Say now, will you be sworne to this or no?
A07807	Say then what is to be thought of the worthinesse of the fact?
A07807	Say, Father Creswell, is this true?
A07807	Say, was the information against the Queene vntrue?
A07807	Say: this proposition, The Pope is taught to haue a Monarchicall power ouer Kings, and people Democraticall, doth it imply contradiction?
A07807	Secondly what haue Protestants done?
A07807	Secundam ipsam locutionem dicit Dominus noster nescire se diem& hor ā de sine seculi: quid enim potest esse, quod ipse nesciat?
A07807	Sed( inquies) quidsi eos occultatos perscrutando inuenissent?
A07807	Shall we call this Religion which dissolueth the dutie of Seruants, Subiects, Debitors, and strangleth the vitall spirits of humane societie?
A07807	Shall we thinke that other Priests can haue more loyall spirits?
A07807	Shall we thinke that the grand Heretikes, the Arrians, were thus formally denounced?
A07807	Sixtus; who Did excommunicate( in that name) the King Nauarre and Prince of Condie?
A07807	Sixtus; who a First did confirme the league in France for the vtter destruction of Protestants?
A07807	So we driuing out one naile with another, oppose acts to acts, and say; But by what right Popes haue vnthronized Emperors let vs know?
A07807	Sometime the Prince is personallie excommunicate, what then?
A07807	That no English Protestant is excommunicate by name, how can you warrant vs?
A07807	The note:[ Their disobedience herein was lawfull, but their dissembling was euill:] And was not this disobedience lawfull?
A07807	The woman is asked, Solde you the land but for so much?
A07807	Then sayd Peter, Why hath Satan filled thine heart that thou should''st lie?
A07807	Then see, I pray you, how much Christian simplicitie doth abhorre this infatuation?
A07807	There is an established Church of Protestants in Sueueland; doe you see no beakons of ● i ● e there which might portend rebellions?
A07807	Thinke you so to babish the wisdome of our State, as not Ianus- wise to looke as well before them as behind?
A07807	Thinkest thou it vnlawfull to bring a Recusant to the Assises?
A07807	This is againe most true: What can you inferre from all this?
A07807	This is also true: But why?
A07807	This is true: What then?
A07807	To conclude, when Saul is slaine by an Amalakite, Dauid entertaineth the murtherer, but how?
A07807	To what end doe you breath fire, and why are your mouthes so hot?
A07807	To what end?
A07807	Vniust?
A07807	Was it because they wanted hope of succession?
A07807	Was it for want of power?
A07807	Was it not the Protestants?
A07807	Was not your Reinolds a Priest?
A07807	Was the King of Spaine the true owner?
A07807	Was therefore God awanting to his Church?
A07807	We do likewise acknowledge that some part of those penalties were more aunciently ordained against others, and not against Protestants; What then?
A07807	We suspect you will proue an honest man: therefore tell vs, Whom do you hold competent Iudges?
A07807	Were euer any Protestants so fantasticall?
A07807	What answer could haue beene giuen more resolute and honest than this?
A07807	What can be the difference betwixt the oath of our Aequiuocators, and of this blasphemous Arius?
A07807	What can this be else( seeing God only is for excellencie called* King of Kings, and Lord of Lords) but an other God?
A07807	What can you answer?
A07807	What can you inferre from hence?
A07807	What could there be in the Protestant?
A07807	What else, but as your Garnet answered for your Tresham, I thinke he did aequiuocate?
A07807	What ground haue you for such an attempt?
A07807	What haue these men done?
A07807	What is then the difference?
A07807	What is this els then that which we reade,* Man in honour hath no vnderstanding, and is become like the beast that perisheth?
A07807	What is this else then to aduance a dogge to be Soueraigne ouer men?
A07807	What is this else then to dissolue all communion with Protestants?
A07807	What is this?
A07807	What is your next claime?
A07807	What nothing?
A07807	What one is there among all these kinds who can be free from your censures against Heretikes?
A07807	What say you to the present point?
A07807	What shall I need to mention Reinolds( in his Rostus) a Doctor of Diuinitie, and chiefest man in the English Seminarie at Rhemes?
A07807	What shall we say then; is the Soueraignty of Kings disabled?
A07807	What shall we then say to the other expositions obiected?
A07807	What should the Disciple of Christ say to this Doctour, though he sate in Peters chaire?
A07807	What therefore?
A07807	What though they then in the Orient of her Maiesties dayes were faithfull?
A07807	What was contained in this schedule?
A07807	What was his excuse now for his first Answer?
A07807	What was their principall Error?
A07807	What was then the cause why the Prince of Condie and the Admirall did beare armes?
A07807	What will you prooue by this?
A07807	What yet more?
A07807	What, obstinate?
A07807	What?
A07807	When being asked, whether you are a Priest, you answer No, what signification hath this word No?
A07807	Where is now your iudgement?
A07807	Whether But seauen, or But foure, what can this auaile for answer?
A07807	Whither shal your next voyage be?
A07807	Who are you, I pray you, that can thus define?
A07807	Who can be more willing to autorize this Aequiuocation, the Arch- piller of security for Romish Priests, then their Arch- priest?
A07807	Whom doe you seeke to destroy?
A07807	Whome did they intend to excommunicate in their some hundred Anathema''s?
A07807	Why Transeat?
A07807	Why iniurious?
A07807	Why so?
A07807	Why?
A07807	Will any iudge otherwise of such an Aequiuocator than of a notorious liar?
A07807	Will you make a lie for him, as one lieth for a man?
A07807	Will your modestie neuer leaue deluding vs by pretended allegations of Iesuites?
A07807	Would you perswade vs to beleeue that by that your protestation, which you teach we need not beleeue by your reseruation?
A07807	Yea, Iubet of obedience?
A07807	Yet what of Fraunce?
A07807	Yet why may not a lying title best befit the doctrine of lying& dissimulation?
A07807	You can find no more exception in England, whither will you now?
A07807	You will not then contend for all the world; what say you to all Kings in Christendome?
A07807	[ We rather obey God then man:] but how?
A07807	a Priest?
A07807	absolutely depriued of all authoritie?
A07807	and did Graue men so iudge of it?
A07807	and might he not likewise erre in canonizing an Offendor?
A07807	and she sayd, Yea, for so much: and Peter sayd, Why haue you agreed together to tempt the spirit of the Lord?
A07807	as actiuely to resist, that is, to rebell against him?
A07807	at vbi ponimus voluntatem& potestatem Dei?
A07807	by Gods will counselling and approuing it?
A07807	by what reason can you challenge my sence of vntruth?
A07807	c An igitur, inquiunt, nunquam Principibus resistere liceat?
A07807	consequentia est?
A07807	f Impudent, subtill, and sactious Heretikes: g For who is if these be not Heretikes?
A07807	f Will you proclaime Nauarre a Caluinist King of Fraunce?
A07807	for you seeme by this Answer to portend some mischiefe, if it should happen his Maiestie should be excommunicate: say, what euill?
A07807	g Shall Catholikes pray, God saue that King, whom they may not admit into their houses?
A07807	h For suppose( saith Father Creswell) that he professe to bring in a more sound Religion; what is this to the purpose?
A07807	holy Iob hath debated this matter long ago, q Will ye talke deceitfully( saith he) for Gods cause, or will you accept his person?
A07807	if they be now extended against Protestants?
A07807	if you will be a true Diuine, then learne from our Sauiour,[* Who made me a Iudge ouer you to diuide inheritances among you?]
A07807	is it spirituall, as onely to be excommunicate by the Pope?
A07807	isto ● … odo dici possit, quidsi turpissi ● … ae mulieri mentienti credere noluissent?
A07807	it is but a step to Scotland, what see you there?
A07807	iura pe ● … tat?
A07807	lemus, deesset vis numerorum aut copiarum?
A07807	may you Priests take a corporall oath before a ciuill Magistrate whomsoeuer?
A07807	nay who was your author witnessing that there was any such decree?
A07807	nonnè tunc rogatus sum vt populum muto sermone mulcerem?
A07807	not one of your sect teach violence?
A07807	not one word in behalfe of Pope Sixtus?
A07807	not to obey man?
A07807	now be restored; for to whom and how can this be performed?
A07807	of Si quis nostris mandatis?
A07807	or were Protestants whom you haue named, of this opinion of Anabaptists?
A07807	quibus vitae periculū attulimus?
A07807	quid cogitas?
A07807	quis tibi periurium tam latam latebram indicauit?
A07807	quâ mendacij excusatione si vti vellera, quis me ferret grauium prudentiumque virorum?
A07807	reioicing and approuing the act?
A07807	they consult with Christ,* Master wilt thou that we command?
A07807	this were hard, for so a Christian shuld be bound to be deceiued: may he lawfully suspect you?
A07807	to make me guilty of that inference, which I noted to be most detestable in your sect?
A07807	unit, quae Gentes restiterent, quae regna non caederent?
A07807	viz in Angliam, cu ● us semen adulterinum vix à Turcaico internosci possit?
A07807	was he not a Nouice deuoted to be a Priest?
A07807	was it rebellion?
A07807	were Anabaptists Protestants?
A07807	were not Ballard, Gifford, and Gartly secular Priests?
A07807	what Minister of the Gospel in all that fierie trial did kindle the least sparke of sedition among her people?
A07807	what euill can ensue?
A07807	what is that?
A07807	what other meaning can armes haue but onely bloud?
A07807	when they shall commaund any thing against the lawe of God?
A07807	whether was it zeale or fury; Christian iustice, or Antichristian malice?
A07807	who were the authors of that decree?
A07807	without all aequiuocation?
A07807	yea, what though not excommunicate?
A09111	& he had answered no, vpon what had fallen the negatiue no?
A09111	( said the Pharises) he answered Non sum: Are 〈 ◊ 〉 Elias?
A09111	( saith Luther against King Henry of England) quis nos coget illi credere?
A09111	( saith he) is the Soueraignty of Kinges disabled?
A09111	A Prophet?
A09111	After the proclamation of her title( saith he) shew vs what Protestant euer resisted?
A09111	And I would demaund him about this matter, whether he will sweare this to be true which he saith of Azor?
A09111	And can not euill Kinges and Princes be the cause of corrupting soules also if they should liue wickedly,& permit or induce others to doe the same?
A09111	And can there be any more blind boldnes then this?
A09111	And did euer man heare so wise a reason?
A09111	And do we not say, that all such reserued propositions are true in themselues in the eares of God, and mynd of the speaker?
A09111	And do yow not thinke that he knew himselfe heere to lye, and egregiously to Equiuocate in the worst sense?
A09111	And doe not we graunt also the same?
A09111	And doe we contradict this?
A09111	And doe yow see how patient and meeke this man is become now, when there is nothing to suffer?
A09111	And doe yow see how this Minister triumpheth?
A09111	And doe yow see this folly?
A09111	And doe yow so Sir?
A09111	And doe yow vnderstand him?
A09111	And doth it seeme to yow that Sotus in this place doth go about to conclude all Equiuocators for lyars, as Morton affirmeth?
A09111	And how doth he proue this?
A09111	And how know wee that these or like wordes were reserued in Christes mind?
A09111	And how then dareth he to commit the same so publickly without blushing?
A09111	And how then doth this fond, and malicious Minister bring in such Marchinges of Catholicke Soldiers against his Maiesty, who euer 〈 ◊ 〉 for him?
A09111	And how then doth this great Moralist condemne all Equiuocators herein as periured lyars?
A09111	And how then was his only crime to haue fauoured the Protestants, as this Minister auerreth?
A09111	And is it so in deed Syr 〈 ◊ 〉?
A09111	And is it so?
A09111	And is not this A full satisfaction trow yow?
A09111	And is not this a good Iewish Aduocate?
A09111	And is not this a goodly manhood trow yow?
A09111	And is not this a great obiection?
A09111	And is not this a great point, for so great a Rabbyn to bragge of, as of a course which he 〈 ◊ 〉 in all his disputes?
A09111	And is not this answered as from a man of his coat?
A09111	And is not this goodly stuffe?
A09111	And is not this great folly and insolency?
A09111	And is not this like to be the bytting of a doggish influence indeed?
A09111	And is not this perfidious dealing?
A09111	And is not this plaine and cleere saith one?
A09111	And is not this secretly to collude with the aduersaries?
A09111	And is not this strange dealing?
A09111	And is there heere any word peculiar of a Protestant Prince, or of his succession?
A09111	And is this naked innocency?
A09111	And is this possible?
A09111	And not only against vs, but to the whole Church of Rome it selfe, and to the vniuersall Catholike Religiō conioyned therwith?
A09111	And now followeth that of the Ghospell Ex ore tuo te indico serue 〈 ◊ 〉: for first I would aske him, is not this Catholicke doctrine?
A09111	And now( good Syr) what will yow proue by all this?
A09111	And now( saith Doctor Hunnius) what way can be more effectuall then this to ouerthrow Christian Religion, and bring in Arrianisme?
A09111	And now, will T. M. allow this also for deuinely spoken?
A09111	And should he not be punished in that Court as a periured person, if it were proued against him?
A09111	And the very same is to be vnderstood in many other places of Scripture, as that of Isay; Quare errare 〈 ◊ 〉 nos Domine de viis tuis?
A09111	And therfore I may aske T. M. why doe yow ly so?
A09111	And was not this an ordinary Equiuocation, which Ministers cryed out that Catholickes then vsed, and especially priests?
A09111	And were not this formall periury, if he did sweare it in any court whatsoeuer?
A09111	And what can be more impious& perilous then this?
A09111	And what can be more odiously vrged thē this?
A09111	And what doth T. M. reply now to this?
A09111	And what then will yow say of this Ministers Equiuocating spirite in the worst kynd of 〈 ◊ 〉?
A09111	And what then will yow say to this Equiuocation?
A09111	And what will T. M. then say to all this, yea to many expresse examples in Scripture it self?
A09111	And what will Thomas Morton now answere to this?
A09111	And what will Thomas Morton now say to this?
A09111	And what will our Minister then answere to this manifest calumniation so apparently conuinced out of Doctor Barkley?
A09111	And what will yow say now of the craftie Equiuocation of these two Ministers?
A09111	And where now is the assurance of his vpright conscience protested to his Maiesty in his Epistle dedicatory?
A09111	And who shall be Iudge of this?
A09111	And who would not thinke but that this accusation were sure, for so much as it is so opprobriously vrged and insulted vpon?
A09111	And why cease they not, according to this mans doctrine from so notorious tumultuations against their lawfull Princes?
A09111	And why had not this letter in so many yeares byn published to the world for the credit of rhe English seruice, and discredit of the Popes?
A09111	And why is all this heat of exclamations?
A09111	And why then( I pray yow) do yow call vs Equiuocators?
A09111	And will T. M. say, that this was a lye or at least a sacrilegious prophanation of an oath?
A09111	And will euer any man credit T. M. any more in any thing that he alledgeth, when this conscienceles falsification is once discouered in him?
A09111	And will you heare his manhood in sound deuinity?
A09111	And will yow say now that Caluin is not worthy to haue his fee of the Arrians?
A09111	And would not yow thinke that Morton did hold himselfe very free from this perfidiousnes, that obiecteth the same so freely against vs?
A09111	And would yow not thinke that this desire, this intreaty, this vrging, and prouocation did proceed from a great confidence in his cause?
A09111	And yet yow thinke yow are a Priest?
A09111	Approuers of Equiuocation in certaine cases, who they be?
A09111	Are not these Indians new Christians as the other in Iury were?
A09111	Are these things suffred to passe without controlment in England?
A09111	As also the many, great, and strong argumentes, that Bellarmine alledgeth to proue his assertion?
A09111	But I would aske him of what doctrine?
A09111	But I would aske him why?
A09111	But I would aske him, Is not Christ Priest ouer vs aswel as for vs?
A09111	But I would aske the poore man, why he doth alleadge this place?
A09111	But I would make this demaund, how came 〈 ◊ 〉 particuler men to be States,& to be called the Common- wealth?
A09111	But how doth he now defend this note of our English Ministers, allowing the deposition and putting to death of Princes?
A09111	But in the Latin neither heere, nor in the Canon it selfe is there any such interrogation at all, as why doe yow so?
A09111	But let the Minister tell vs, who shall be Iudge of this, who shall determine the case?
A09111	But now what writeth M. Iewell of him, and with what truth and conscience?
A09111	But what doth he accuse vs of in effect?
A09111	But what is all this to the purpose?
A09111	But what is this to the purpose?
A09111	But what saith Caluin?
A09111	But what saith Caluin?
A09111	But what saith this Doctor Genesius?
A09111	But what saith 〈 ◊ 〉 on their side?
A09111	But what wil yow say, if I haue sworne?
A09111	But what?
A09111	But what?
A09111	But why had he not adioyned also, that if he were careles of his flocke, then Gregory must be his name, which importeth a vigilant pastor?
A09111	Can any thing be more fraudently alledged?
A09111	Can any thing be more ridiculous then this?
A09111	Can any thing conuince more our Ministers Calumniation then this?
A09111	Can conscience beare witnes, then can it also speake?
A09111	Can the Reader tolerate such an impertinent writer?
A09111	Can these thinges stād togeather?
A09111	Can this be ignorance?
A09111	Common sense( saith he) might haue replyed( to the souldiers) what could yow tell what was done when yow were all a sleepe?
A09111	Could any Infidell speake more cōtēptuously of our proofes?
A09111	Could the Arrians doe more for themselues, or their owne cause?
A09111	Did Albertus Magnus, S. Thomas of Aquin, and so many others of that ranke know logicke?
A09111	Did Thomas Morton euer finde in any Catholicke writer such wordes, or sense in preiudice of Princes?
A09111	Do not all Princes know, that Innocentius is truly the elected of God?
A09111	Do not all sortes of men euen by the instinct of nature it self vse and practice this, without any instruction at all?
A09111	Doe yow heare this new Prophet declare himself cleerly?
A09111	Doe yow see his poore flattering shift?
A09111	Doe yow see the essence of his doctrine?
A09111	Doe yow see the malice of the man?
A09111	Doe yow see the prophanity of this mans spirit?
A09111	Doth not Genesius himselfe in the very Chapter heere cited alleadge both S. Hierome and S. Augustine for this interpretation, and alloweth the same?
A09111	Doth this take away the doctrine it self?
A09111	Et respondit non: Are yow a Prophet?
A09111	First, he saith, that our owne ancient expositor Lyranus in his Commentary, holdeth that Ieremy did not ly, but what of this?
A09111	For as all Deuines hold, that which may lawfully be said may also lawfully be sworne, what will T. M. answere tò this?
A09111	For if our Sauiour had byn asked, Is this maid dead?
A09111	For if vpon this cause she were excommunicated, what parte had Ca holicks therin?
A09111	For what certainty can T. M. haue( thinke yow) against the bodily 〈 ◊ 〉 of our Blessed Lady, his assertion being a bare negatiue?
A09111	For what hath any Pope done against the Protestant Kings of Denmarke in this our age?
A09111	For what high tribunall( I pray yow) hath logicke in deuinity?
A09111	For what?
A09111	For what?
A09111	For where doth he fynd these marchinges against his Maiesty?
A09111	Francorum, Anglorum, Hispanorum,& postremò Romanorum Rex Innocentium in Papam suscipiunt& recognoscunt 〈 ◊ 〉 Episcopum animarum suarum?
A09111	Gabriel Biel a very Religious learned man?
A09111	Goodman also, Gilby, VVhittingham, Knox, Buchanan, and others neerer home vnto vs?
A09111	Had these souldyers an opinion perhaps that their Priests could not sinne?
A09111	Hath God and nature left no lawfull manner of euasion, by force of wit and reason whereby a man may deliuer himself from such an incumbrance?
A09111	Hath Sayer any such word or sentence?
A09111	Hath he aduentured his life to gaine those soules vnto Christ, that dyed for them, as others haue donne?
A09111	Hath he no honester comparisons to bring in then the blind loue of Thais, and embracing of Helena?
A09111	Hath he perchance euer byn there?
A09111	Henricus de Gandauo Archdeacon of Tornay?
A09111	How can this be true M. Morton in plaine and literail sense, and without some amphibology or Equiuocation?
A09111	How doth foolish vanity discouer it selfe in all these mens wordes& actions?
A09111	How doth he talke of such kylling of supposed Philisthines by the iaw- bone of an asse?
A09111	How impertinent then is this proofe?
A09111	How then is this to the purpose?
A09111	How then will yow, or can yow defend it?
A09111	I might 〈 ◊ 〉 heere to this effect and purpose, that ambiguous and equiuocall answere of the said S. Iohn about Elias, Elias es tu?
A09111	If therfore the Prophet had byn demaunded; shall not Ezechias liue any longer?
A09111	If they did not, how did they write so many large and learned Treatises therof?
A09111	If they did, why doth Thomus Morton except against them all in this science?
A09111	In what place do they so sound out the word Amen, to the likenesse of a certayne heauenly thunder?
A09111	Iohn Caluin vvhether he fauoured 〈 ◊ 〉 or no?
A09111	Iohn Gerson Chancellour of that Vniuersity?
A09111	Is he not ashamed of this so shamefull ouersight?
A09111	Is it not ours?
A09111	Is not all this so?
A09111	Is not this a full satisfaction, according to the title of his booke?
A09111	Is not this a very childish ouerlashing?
A09111	Is not this by dissimulation to weakē our owne forces in fauour of the enemies?
A09111	Is not this great simplicity, to presume a grant and to plead that grant in print, wheras the thing is euidently denyed?
A09111	Is not this pernicious Equiuocation on one side to call vpon him& on the other to reiect him?
A09111	Is not this sensles?
A09111	Is not this to accuse and defend, affirme and deny, and to speake contraries with one and the same breath?
A09111	Is not this wickedly to betray the cause of Christians?
A09111	Is not this wilfull, and malicious fraude?
A09111	Is the hand of God shortened?
A09111	Is there no meane between these two extreames?
A09111	Is this any way to be mainteined by any shew or shift whatsoeuer?
A09111	Is this for a man that somuch abhorreth Equiuocation?
A09111	Is this honesty in a Minister?
A09111	Is this iustifiable( for he calleth this Treatise a iustification of Protestantes?)
A09111	Is this manhood?
A09111	Is this sound deuinity?
A09111	Is this the assurance 〈 ◊ 〉 his vpright conscience, wherof he braggeth to his Maiesty?
A09111	Is this true I say?
A09111	It may be, some doe but doubtingly defend it, what will yow iudge of these?
A09111	Lo heere, and doe not these men find Scriptures for all purposes?
A09111	May not any number of rebells make themselues a state in this sense?
A09111	Morton is proued to be?
A09111	Morton, and that in print?
A09111	Mortons whole Treatise: and how doe yow thinke will he play the man heere to auoid all this battery?
A09111	Nay doth not all this speach of Iansenius make wholy against Morton?
A09111	Nay is it not rather babish childhood, that seemeth not to know the very first Elementes of true deuinity?
A09111	Nay why did he adde further, O Dionyse, O Anacletus, O Sixtus, as though he had followed their doctrine also, or admitted their authority?
A09111	No truly?
A09111	Now then how doe yow thinke that T. M. shifteth of this charge?
A09111	Now then what hath all this to doe with Contumax Haereticus tam praesumptus quàm manifestus?
A09111	Numquid( saith he) non omnes Principes cognouerunt, quia ipse est verè Dei electus?
A09111	Obstinacy necessary to make heresy, and vvhy?
A09111	Or did they hold this for 〈 ◊ 〉 point of doctrine, determined vnto them out of Moyses chayre?
A09111	Or doe not the same thinges remaine in Holinshed, Hooker, Harison, Thyn, and other writers aswell English as Scottish?
A09111	Or doe not we teach that temporall Princes power ought principally, as S. Leo saith, to extend it self to the defence ad preseruation of the Church?
A09111	Or doth all this proue that this was not their doctrine?
A09111	Or doth it proue that those first Ghospellers held it not?
A09111	Or doth not this also proue him to be one of those forenamed Doctors, that vnderstand not what they say, or wherof they affirme?
A09111	Or if te y did not, how is this their fact attributed by Thomas Morton vnto that 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A09111	Or to omit externe writers, did our famous Countreymen, Alexander of Hales, Scotus, Burley, Middleton, Occham and others know Logicke?
A09111	Or was not Queene Maries title yet proclaimed?
A09111	Or who gaue her this tribunall?
A09111	Or why do yow corrupt your Author so?
A09111	Or why doe yow delude your Reader so?
A09111	Or will Thomas Morton say still that our malignant Doctors doe wrongfully accuse him?
A09111	Or will yow say, as yow said before, that their iudgment hath byn depraued by our malignant Doctors?
A09111	Or will yow thinke it rather folly then falshood, that could not discerne betweene verò and verè?
A09111	Petrus Paludanus Patriarch afterward of Hierusalem?
A09111	Propheta es tu?
A09111	Prophetam?
A09111	Quisest Augustinus?
A09111	Secondly there is wilfull deceipt in leauing out the first wordes of the Author, Sed quid dices, si iuraui?
A09111	Shew vs what Protestant euer resisted?
A09111	Supremacy impugned by diuers Protestants in the beginning and vvhy?
A09111	THE THIRD PART OF THIS CHAPTER, CONTEYNING A CONTROVERSY: VVhether Caluin did fauour Arrianisme, or no?
A09111	That our mixt reserued propositions are not ambiguous, doubtfull, and equiuocall?
A09111	The countries spoiled?
A09111	The people slaine and murdered about this difference?
A09111	The third Part of this Chapter, VVhether the former mixt Proposition, partly vttered, and partly reserued, be 〈 ◊ 〉 or noe?
A09111	The townes and villages burnt and ouerthrowne?
A09111	The woman is asked( saith he:) Sould yow the land for so much?
A09111	This is the force of the argument: what answereth he therunto?
A09111	To whome doth this voice of the Cryer in the desert speake, vnto faithfull people?
A09111	Truly if the confidence were not great, the crafte and dissimulation was singuler: but what ensued?
A09111	VVhat can be more carnally spoken, more wickedly, sacrilegiously, and blasphemously, then that of Hierome, Virginitas caelum, coniugium terram replet?
A09111	VVhether he fauoured Arrianisme, or noe?
A09111	Was it not a figure also of many thinges vpon earth, which should be fulfilled in the new Testament?
A09111	Was not heere wilfull deceipt, nay 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 will and desire of deceauing?
A09111	Were not their Cerimonies and Sacrifices a figure of our Sacramentes& Sacrifice?
A09111	Were they not Protestantes that were authors therof?
A09111	What Equiuocation then call yow this in M. Iewell?
A09111	What any thing absolutly?
A09111	What can yow answere?
A09111	What certainty against the miracles wrought by God in the Indies?
A09111	What dealing, what conscience, what truth is this?
A09111	What doth the Minister now Reply vpon large and mature deliberation in this his full satisfaction?
A09111	What extreme impudency is this in a Minister?
A09111	What falshood is this then to alledge Authors thus directly against their owne sense, meaning, and whole drift?
A09111	What impiety were it to affirme this defect to be in Christes Kingly gouernment, and consequētly what folly is it to bring in such reasons?
A09111	What of such lying, and perfidious Equiuocation?
A09111	What reioynder would our minister make?
A09111	What shall I say more, or what shall I complaine more?
A09111	What shall we stand wrangling with this Minister, or any his like, about possibilities or coniecturall probabilities?
A09111	What shameles dealing then is this of our Minister to charge Genesius with such folly or impiety which he neuer thought of?
A09111	What then will Thomas Morton say to this?
A09111	What then?
A09111	What triall, what witnes can haue place if this kind of answering may be admitted?
A09111	What will he say to the Rebellion of Syr Thomas VVyat and his confederates in Kent ensuing about the same time?
A09111	What will he say to the cōspiracies ensuing after this againe, from Syr Edward Courtney Earle of Deuonshire, Syr Nicolas Throckmorton,& others?
A09111	When was it euer seene that the iudgment of the Church did take authority from the Emperour?
A09111	Wherwith doe yow know it?
A09111	Who can belieue this Minister at his word herafter?
A09111	Who can number the Citties beseiged, taken, rifled and ransacked?
A09111	Who is Augustine?
A09111	Who is like rather to be bitten of the highest dogg, eyther we or yow that can not tell what yow say or proue, eyther for yow, or against your selfe?
A09111	Who saith so?
A09111	Who then shall ryse in Iudgment against Thomas Morton, for all this wilfull lying?
A09111	Who would argue thus but Thomas Morton?
A09111	Who would not thinke that this were more then only permission?
A09111	Who would say so, but M. Iewell, who careth not what he saith?
A09111	Why doe they not then put it in practice?
A09111	Why is not this doctrine of the Scripture of perfecting their vertue by bearing and suffering admitted by them?
A09111	Why then doe his Protestāt Captaines& Leaders vse them?
A09111	Why?
A09111	Will Sepulueda deny all those Fathers alleadged by me before for our interpretation to be Fathers?
A09111	Will T. M. deny this?
A09111	Will he condemne all such stratagems as sinfull, as heathenish, as hellish, as impious?
A09111	Will he haue them all made away from the face of the Earth?
A09111	Will he haue them to liue in perpetuall torment, hatred, suspicions, iealosyes, auersions, detestations,& deadly hostilities, the one with the other?
A09111	Will he not be ashamed to see himself cōuinced ofso great and shameles ouerlashing?
A09111	Will our Minister face out this?
A09111	Would it not haue directly signified( as his words be) that he had not knowne therof in deed?
A09111	Would yow not thinke that the man had spoken somewhat to the purpose, that thus concludeth?
A09111	Yow shall heare his shift( for he is much troubled with his Maiesties obseruation:) VVhat shall we say then?
A09111	and that the Sea Apostolike graunteth out full priuiledge of lying, as before yow haue heard him auouch?
A09111	and vnder the German Emperour in diuers partes of his dominions( all Catholicke Princes) and in the free- cityes of the Empyre?
A09111	and was not the censure of the Puritanes cast of a little before in regard of like passion?
A09111	and will yow stand to it, and leese your credit if this be falsely or calumniously alleadged?
A09111	and would not his hearers haue taken it so?
A09111	answere to all this thinke yow?
A09111	appoint vs lawes of liuing, and the like?
A09111	as also the passing of the Red- sea by the Israelites?
A09111	as namely in his Lords Court of the Arches?
A09111	but especially in him, that professeth himselfe a Minister of simple truth?
A09111	can this be done but of purpose, and consequently by a guilty conscience?
A09111	deserueth he not a laurell for this conquest?
A09111	did Maldonate say, that all Greeke copies had it so?
A09111	did S. Paul lye in this Equiuocation?
A09111	did all this I say any thing auaile her or procure her safty or quietnes, in gouerning these new Ghospellers?
A09111	did his Protestant- Authors before mencioned write or teach this doctrine whē they were pressed by their Catholicke Princes to be quiet?
A09111	did the Sea of Rome or any Bishop therof euer goe about to hurt or preiudice him?
A09111	doth he not heere call the Author therof Cunerus, ours?
A09111	doth it not speake also indifferently of all sortes of Religion, of what side soeuer the truth be?
A09111	doth not S. Paul in the ninth and tenth of his first Epistle to the Corinthians set down many examples to this effect?
A09111	doth not he binde and loose our sinnes?
A09111	doth not he prescribe vs Sacramentes?
A09111	doth this become a Minister of simple truth?
A09111	doth 〈 ◊ 〉 himselfe agree to that opinion?
A09111	etiam dico vobis& plus quàm Prophetam: What went yow forth to see in the desert?
A09111	fit for a Chaplyn of my Lord of Canterbury?
A09111	fit for a booke?
A09111	fit for a print?
A09111	hath he not a spirituall and Priestly iurisdiction ouer our soules?
A09111	how did Catholickes and Arrians liue so many yeares togeather vnder Arrian Kinges and Emperours in old times, both in Spaine and els 〈 ◊ 〉?
A09111	how doe Catholickes and Protestantes liue togeather at this day vnder the most Christian King of France?
A09111	how many hath it molested, censured, deposed, or troubled for the same?
A09111	how then are we so blinded with the loue of our Thais, as rather to snatch at any meaning, then take that which is meant?
A09111	how then doth he affirme euery where, that our doctrine teacheth killing of Princes?
A09111	may a man swear this in your Lordes Court of the Arches?
A09111	may not M. Mortons Epithets of hellish, heathenish, impious, and sacrilegious, haue place heere?
A09111	nay doth not the text speake plainly of making a King where none is?
A09111	or can any man excuse him from falshood and malice in this open treachery?
A09111	or doe not these actions appertaine vnto him as high Priest ouer his Church?
A09111	or doth this proue that we ascribe Democraticall soueraignity ouer Kings vnto the people?
A09111	or had he committed 〈 ◊ 〉 prophanation if he had sworne it?
A09111	or of what weight it is, or may be for his purpose?
A09111	or that he himselfe was of that opinion?
A09111	or that the most ancient, and purest did so read?
A09111	or was his dissimulation impious, for that one part was deceaued?
A09111	or what will you do with such men?
A09111	or who shall compell vs to beleeue him?
A09111	shall he be credited herafter?
A09111	that Popes can not be Heretickes, or be deposed for the same?
A09111	their Manna of our Eucharist?
A09111	their being baptized in the cloude?
A09111	their circumcisions and washinges, figures of our Baptisme?
A09111	their drinking out of the rock, which 〈 ◊ 〉 Christ?
A09111	their food of the Manna?
A09111	vnder the great King of Polonia?
A09111	vnder the state of Venice?
A09111	was not this singuler and extraordinary, yea hypocrisy, and lying Equiuocation in the highest degree?
A09111	was there no deuinity before Logicke was inuented by the Philosophers?
A09111	were not these thinges to be fulfilled aswell vpon earth as in heauen?
A09111	were they not first subiectes?
A09111	what Minister of the Ghospell in all that fiery triall did kindle the least spark of sedition among her people?
A09111	what against diuers other particular Princes both of the Empire and otherwise, who haue in this our age departed from the obedience of that Sea?
A09111	what against those of Sweueland either Father or Sonne, though the later doth offer open iniury to a Catholicke King the true inheritor?
A09111	what may the hearer belieue of all he saith, when euery where he is found intangled with such foolish treachery?
A09111	what say yow M. Morton?
A09111	what wilfull wrangling is this in a turbulent Minister?
A09111	when being asked whether yow are a Priest, yow 〈 ◊ 〉 no, what signification hath this word no?
A09111	where haue yow buryed him?
A09111	where his naked innocency?
A09111	where is his simplicity in Christ Iesus?
A09111	who will deny this?
A09111	who would say it but T. M?
A09111	why doe his Protestāt Ministers that liue with them allow therof?
A09111	why had not he cyted some place or testimony wherby might appeare this to be true that he obiecteth heere to these mē against his Highnes?
A09111	why hast thou made vs:( o Lord) to erre from thy wayes?
A09111	why should he deny it to be a true proposition?
A09111	will he deny it to be a dissimulation, and consequently also an Equiuocation in fact?
A09111	will he hold that all kind of Equiuocation is lying?
A09111	will he say that their exposition is contrary to all common sense?
A09111	will he still defend, that there is nothing but lying in Rome?
A09111	yea hellish and heathnish Equiuocators for vsing the same?
A09111	yea vnder the Pope himselfe?
A09106	& c. Did the priesthood of Iewry cōfirme this answer?
A09106	& c. where is this Man, the new select Aduocate for this cause?
A09106	& now aboue fiftie more newly added out of the said Reply, which are set downe in my seauenth Chapter?
A09106	& this very place here quoted by M. Morton, togeather with another of Toletus to the same effect?
A09106	& wil not he yet blush at this new fraud of his discouered?
A09106	( for he saith but Vide) to the sermō of S. Ambrose, and this other place cyted out of the same sermon?
A09106	( saith he) Mansueta quid fecit?
A09106	11. which is shewed to import as much as whē a Priest is vnlaw ● ully demaunded, Are you a Priest?
A09106	11.?
A09106	45 VVhere is now( saith he) the boast of P. R. for Sriptures, Fathers, Reasons?
A09106	84 18 About Emanuel S ●: whether he contradicteth all Equiuocation?
A09106	And I would demaund M. Mortō about this matter, whether he will sweare this to be true which he sayth of Azor?
A09106	And can there be any greater cōtradiction the ● this?
A09106	And can there be any more vntrue dealing then this?
A09106	And can there be any more witting and wilfull falshood then this?
A09106	And consequently these foure examples dissembled by him are foure seuerall falshoods wittingly and willingly cōmitted?
A09106	And could any say thus ● ut a ly ● r?
A09106	And could this be playne dealing?
A09106	And did he not herin speake to the purpose?
A09106	And did not he know, that he lyed when he wrote this?
A09106	And did not this require some answere also among the rest?
A09106	And did you euer heare a sober man in this tune?
A09106	And do I then heere play Legier- de- main cōueying rings into other mens pockets, and changing Holinshed into Fox?
A09106	And do you heare him how he croweth?
A09106	And do you not thinke that the letters T. M. may receyue in like manner variety of such allusions?
A09106	And do you thinke that he will stand to these Canons now alleadged?
A09106	And do yow see how this Mynister tryumpheth?
A09106	And do yow thinke, that he will be a true Conuertite in deed?
A09106	And doth it seeme to you, that Sotus in this place doth go about to conclude all Equiuocators for lyars, as M. Morton affirmeth?
A09106	And doth not euery body see the vanity of this inference?
A09106	And doth not the discrete Reader see by these manner of Challenges, that the man hath more need of compassion& commiseration from me then confutation?
A09106	And finally you demand in great brauery; VVhere is this man P. R. himsel ● e, the new select Aduocate ● or this cause?
A09106	And from whome?
A09106	And had I not rea ● ● n to note such a slippery shift deuised by M. Morton 〈 ◊ 〉 a scoffe against a Catholike learned Authour?
A09106	And hath not this contumelious Minister, that so desperatly presumeth thus to speake, a wi ● e and good benefices?
A09106	And haue not we alleaged three for his one to the contrary?
A09106	And haue you euer heard more confident ● each?
A09106	And heere now I must demand of the Reader what he vnderstandeth M. Morton his purpose to be in this place?
A09106	And heere now I would demaund M. Morton in sincerity, did he meane of our Priests and doctours in generall, or noe?
A09106	And how could he thinke this, if sometymes at leastwise( as he confesseth) he vttered all in English, and this to English men?
A09106	And how doth M. Morton now in this his Preambling Reply, endeauour to satisfie these two charges?
A09106	And how doth this strike the nayle on the head for M. Morton?
A09106	And how impertinent then is it for M. Morton in these two things to frame a contradiction?
A09106	And how then dareth he to commit the same so publikely without blushing?
A09106	And how then did he make that stout deniall before mentioned in two or three bouts, and now the third tyme doth stand in it also?
A09106	And how then do our Ministers so raue against it?
A09106	And how then doth he auouch it?
A09106	And how then doth he conuince me of falshood?
A09106	And how then is this called a fall recouerable by no excuse?
A09106	And how thē doth this great Morali ● ● condemne all Equiuocators herin as periured lyars?
A09106	And if he be not able to ● efend them before man, how will he iustifie thē ● efore God?
A09106	And if it doth not, as euery man seeth, why then is it brought in h ● e ● e in this place for a seuerall obiection of fa ● shood against me?
A09106	And is it so Syr?
A09106	And is not this a full satisfaction trow you?
A09106	And is not this a good fourth witn ● sse to ioyne with the former for discrediting of Pope Gregory?
A09106	And is not this a goodly answere?
A09106	And is not this a goodly deduction?
A09106	And is not this a great inference, when he should conuince me of wilfull falsity?
A09106	And is not this a legall record?
A09106	And is not this a p ● easāt iest to escape by?
A09106	And is not this a strange euasion in him, that ● rofesseth such skill in Logike, yea to haue bene a ● ublike reader of Logike?
A09106	And is not this an ordinary practise euen amongst the best men of what religiō soeuer, and such as most of all do detest lying?
A09106	And is not this great folly& insolency?
A09106	And is not this our Case plainly?
A09106	And is not this perfidious dealing?
A09106	And is not this probable?
A09106	And is not this strange dealing?
A09106	And is not this then mere trifling?
A09106	And is not this to play his soule vpon lesse then tre- trip?
A09106	And is this a good witnes?
A09106	And is this good dealing euen in the very first case which he proposeth a ● ter the Conquest?
A09106	And is this naked innocency& c?
A09106	And is this plaine dealing?
A09106	And is this possible?
A09106	And is this simplicity in writing?
A09106	And may he not fill vp bookes, if he will, with such toyes?
A09106	And not only against vs, but to the whole Church of Rome it selfe, and to the vniuersall Catholicke Religiō conioyned therwith?
A09106	And now will any man say, but M. Morton, that the learned Iesuit Emanuel Sà, is a good witnesse against all vse of Equiuocation?
A09106	And shall this in like manner be iudged from the purpose, and a Nihil dicit?
A09106	And should he not be punished in that Court, as a periured person, if it were proued against him?
A09106	And that as he held the one for iustified, so did he hould the other for iustifiable, and that herin there was no exception to be made?
A09106	And that it was impossible to be true?
A09106	And that of the Priest to be as vnlawfull as the other of the woman?
A09106	And the styrring vp of euery child of truth to attention, make euery man witnesse of his owne disgrace?
A09106	And therefore I may aske T. M. why do you lye so?
A09106	And therefore for me to change voluntarily these names, Cui bono?
A09106	And told also a manifest lye of Thodoret?
A09106	And was not all this to the purpose?
A09106	And was not this a Nimium dicit in like manner?
A09106	And was not this a cunning cut?
A09106	And was not this graue matter, thinke you, for a Iudge to treate in that place and auditory?
A09106	And was not this worthy of some consideration in his answere?
A09106	And was this a good exāple to proue that it was a law at that tyme, that euery Queene might take,& giue solely without the King her husband?
A09106	And was this also ● rom the purpose, to proue that Queene Elizabeth could not haue it?
A09106	And were not his shame the greater, yf he should be ouercome by him?
A09106	And were not this formall periury, if he did sweare it in any Court whatsoeuer?
A09106	And were this now substantiall dealing for satisfaction of his creditours?
A09106	And what can be more odiously vrged then this?
A09106	And what doth T. M. now reply to this?
A09106	And what doth he inferre heerof thinke you?
A09106	And what els?
A09106	And what hath now M. Morton to reply to these so euident and important differences, that make the one answere lawfull, the other a lye?
A09106	And what inconuenience hath this doctrine that it should be called Childhood and babish grammer?
A09106	And what inferreth this?
A09106	And what inuincible argumēt hath M. Morton, thinke you, now to proue that they are all one?
A09106	And what is this to so long and large a discourse as mine was?
A09106	And what is this to the purpose then, to proue that th ● se Authors did erre wittingly against their conscience?
A09106	And what may not be defended or deluded in this sort?
A09106	And what now doth there result against Bellarmine in all this obiection?
A09106	And what now is there heere in Costerus his speach about the lying of Romanists or Roman VVriters?
A09106	And what then shall wee say of the Dolphin of France, when he commeth to yeares to succ ● ed in that Crowne, after the death of the King his father?
A09106	And what triall will you make of their spirits heere?
A09106	And what will Syr Edward now say to this also?
A09106	And what will our Minister then answere to this manifest calumniation so apparently conuinced out of D. Barkley?
A09106	And what will yee say of this manner of dealing?
A09106	And where is now( saith he) P. R. his boast of ● criptures, Fathers, Reasons?
A09106	And whether you haue vsed true dealing in the manner of recounting the same?
A09106	And who shall be iudge of this?
A09106	And who would haue brought in this for an example of wilfull falshood but only M. Morton?
A09106	And why had not this Letter in so many yeares byn published to the world for the credit of the English Seruice, and discredit of the Popes?
A09106	And why then had not he answered somwhat to this Charge, being so weighty,& substantiall as it is?
A09106	And why thinke you ● i d M. Morton conceale these two Fathers names?
A09106	And will Syr Edward Cooke say, that this was frō the purpose,& a Nihil dicit?
A09106	And will any man of sense belieue this to be true?
A09106	And will he still stand to his former assertion, that the Brytish lawes were neuer altered by the Romās?
A09106	And will ye not take pitty of this mans passion?
A09106	And will you heare his manhood in sound diuinity?
A09106	And yet as though he had taken me at a great aduantage, he runneth to his accustomed ridiculous interrogations: VVhat excuse now shall P. R. make?
A09106	And ● aue you heard this craking?
A09106	Are not these actions opposite to Iesuites?
A09106	Are not these ingenious iests?
A09106	Are you a Prophet?
A09106	As also by wilfull erring( if it had bene an errour,) in counting how many times M. Morton had set downe the Clause of reseruation in latin?
A09106	As also the many great& strōg argumēts that Bellarmyne alleageth to proue his assertion?
A09106	As for example when S. Iohn Baptist was dem ● nded, Propheta es tu?
A09106	At what time?
A09106	Behold heere a whole change of lawes denied so resolutly by our two Iustices as you haue heard before: were they good Antiquaries in this thinke yow?
A09106	But I would aske him of what doctrine?
A09106	But I would aske him why?
A09106	But doth not the malicious man see, that the same inference may be made of all Professours of other Religions in like manner?
A09106	But first how doth he proue that she had ● his meaning of reseruation in her mind?
A09106	But how now( thinke you) doth all this conuince, or so much as accuse me of any willfull falsitie?
A09106	But how will he proue it thinke you?
A09106	But i ● may ● e( saith he) that he which doubteth is ignorant: ● ill no ignorance excuse him?
A09106	But in the Latyn neither here, nor in the Canon it selfe, is there any such interrogation at all, as why do you so?
A09106	But now perhaps the reader will demād what hath M. Morton answered to these two Chapters in this his Preamblatorie Reply?
A09106	But now what hath M. Morton eyther against vs, or for himselfe out of this case?
A09106	But now what hath Maldonatus here in the sentence alleaged, that I should willinglie pretermit to answere, as being ouermatched therewith?
A09106	But now what of this?
A09106	But now( to returne to the matter) what is this against our Clause of Reseruation in a propositiō or sentence?
A09106	But now, what if this be noe fault or contradiction at all in P. R. either pardonable or not pardonable?
A09106	But to come to the matter, what saith he to the point it self of iustifying his allegation of the vn ● ruth of Lambertus against Pope Gregory?
A09106	But what argument will M. Morton frame out of these my words?
A09106	But what do you professe to proue?
A09106	But what infelicitie is this vnto my imputation out of Lābertus?
A09106	But what is this to the purpose?
A09106	But what is this to the ● urpose?
A09106	But what of this?
A09106	But what saith he heere for his defence?
A09106	But what saith this Doctor Genesius?
A09106	But what will you say, if I haue sworne?
A09106	But wheron I pray you is this ir ● epugnable consequence grounded?
A09106	But why had not M. Morton mentioned Vrspergensis at the firs ●?
A09106	But why is this impudencie?
A09106	But why said he nothing to this, seing it hath more difficulty in it, then many other layd togeather?
A09106	But ô M. Morton, let me pose you heere: Is it true that your aduersary sayd, so farre, and no further to the purpose in hand?
A09106	By Fathers?
A09106	By whome?
A09106	Can M. Morton answere any thing to this so lewd& wilfull absurdity?
A09106	Can any thing be more fraudulētly alleadged?
A09106	Can any thing be more ridiculous then this?
A09106	Can he deny but that the Bishop of Rome is tearmed Apostolus and Apostolicus almost eu ● ry where in the same ancient lawes?
A09106	Can there any match be found to this?
A09106	Can there be any defence of this so apparent abuse?
A09106	Can there be any more poore and miserable dealing then this?
A09106	Can there be any more wilfull& witting fraud, then this?
A09106	Can there be more wilfull malice then this?
A09106	Can there be ● ny greater absurdity then this, to promise wilfull falshood, and then to alleadge only diuersity of opinions?
A09106	Can these fraudes be committed but of deliberation and set purpose?
A09106	Can these things stand togeather?
A09106	Comm ● n s ● ns ●( sayth he) might haue r ● ply ● d, how could you t ● ll ● ha ● was donne, whē you were all asleepe?
A09106	Common sense( saith he) might haue replied( to the souldiers) what could you tell what was donne, when you were all asleep?
A09106	Could it be errour of print?
A09106	Could that errour be by errour of print, diuersity of translation, or difference of editions?
A09106	Dallers of Germany, or English Angels?
A09106	Did our Sauiour make Pilate his competent Iudge, by swearing to him by God?
A09106	Diuersities of translation& c?
A09106	Do English Ministers take vpon them these labours?
A09106	Do not these thing ● simbolize with the life of Iesus?
A09106	Do thou( Reader) consider whether the wordes of Origen may be interpreted of the fire of the last cōflagration or ● ot?
A09106	Do you not see, that still the poore man runneth quite from the purpose, and hath nothing to say to the effect he should say?
A09106	Do you see this mans heat?
A09106	Do you see where the man is againe?
A09106	Do you see, what a kind of proofe he bringeth?
A09106	Do yow see how confidently he writeth?
A09106	Doe you respect what you vt ● ● ●?
A09106	Doth he obserue this?
A09106	Doth not euery one of these examples conuince him of wilfull fraud?
A09106	Doth the man( who maketh mention of his interruption by sicknesse) know what he hath now said?
A09106	Doth this become a Minister o ● simple truth?
A09106	Doth this man know, or care, what he saith?
A09106	Doth this take away the doctrine it self?
A09106	Ethelswith was a law, or according to the cōmon law in those dayes?
A09106	For albeit the wordes of S. Peter in the text of the Actes of the Apostles be, Tell me, woman, if you sould the ● eild for so much?
A09106	For if vpon this cause she were excommunicated, what part had Catholicks therin?
A09106	For to the first this only he answereth: What haue I reported from Polidore?
A09106	For to what end or profit should P. R. erre willingly in a matter that importeth him and his cause so little?
A09106	For what can it impor ● either to be shauen or be long- bearded, to vse collusion in treating of a cause?
A09106	For what knoweth he what God may inspire his Maiesty in succeeding yeares?
A09106	French Crownes?
A09106	From whence is this tradition( of not rebaptizing heretickes?)
A09106	Goodman also, Gilby, VVhittingham, Knox, Buchanan, and others neerer home vnto vs?
A09106	Gratious and meeke Lady what hath she euer done?
A09106	Had not this bene probable in such a case to mans discourse?
A09106	Hath Sayer any such word or sentence?
A09106	Hath he any shadow of excuse by ignorance of the Author and place?
A09106	Hath he cleered himselfe of falshood?
A09106	Haue you seene any demonstration alleadged by him for it, besides his ● nly imagination, and fond ● upposition?
A09106	How can he proue it?
A09106	How did he discouer his escapes therin, as here he professeth?
A09106	How doth he giue me speciall e thanks for pardoning him in one of his escapes, and for ascribing it to that he had not seene the Author himself?
A09106	How impertmently is this Grammaticall phrase applyed by Syr Edward?
A09106	How many periods be there heere false of his?
A09106	How must it be executed?
A09106	How then are these two first pointes answered of falsifying a decree, and peruerting the Glos ● e?
A09106	How then bl ● sh you not to deny this?
A09106	How then can this be excused without some shift of Equiuocall meaning in this false Minister, saying one thing,& meaning another?
A09106	How then doth M. Morton answere to the purpose?
A09106	How then doth the Iustice trifle so in this matter?
A09106	How then is M. Morton so sufficiently furnished to con ● ound vs with true and playne confessed testimonyes?
A09106	How then is it heere againe brought in against me in this ninth obiection of ● alsity?
A09106	How then is this to the purpose?
A09106	How was it made?
A09106	How will this soūd in the eares of all forraine Monarches, and greatest Potentates that are touched therby?
A09106	I haue alleaged the later, and P. R. hath opposed the former, both of vs haue affirmed a truth, where then is the falshood?
A09106	If by errour he missed in the citation, why happened it vpon those things that were all to his aduantage?
A09106	If he do not: But when?
A09106	If then that Virgin that was capable of God, must come into the seuerity of Gods iudgment, who will dare to desyre to be iudg ● d by God?
A09106	If you say( quoth he) that they differ, then must the difference be eyther in respect of the speakers, or of the hearers?
A09106	Ignorance?
A09106	Ignorance?
A09106	Ignorance?
A09106	Is he found false in any one thing which heere is said?
A09106	Is he helped by dif ● erence of translations or editions?
A09106	Is it because Otto Frisingensis is cyted cōtrary to his meaning?
A09106	Is it deriued from our Lords Authority?
A09106	Is it not playne that Morton ● elleth ● elleth wynd, and wordes, and vaunts for workes?
A09106	Is it not wilfull?
A09106	Is it possible that my aduersary can free himself from a falsity corroding the conscience?
A09106	Is not one only of these tricks sufficient to des ● rie,& discredit his bad conscience in wryting?
A09106	Is not the hart of kings in the hands of God?
A09106	Is not this M. Mortons plaine meaning( thinke you) as both his words and drift do shew?
A09106	Is not this a good syllogisme?
A09106	Is not this a strange direct and demonstratiue proofe, to proue one thing by another?
A09106	Is not this exc ● ssiue ouerlashing against others, and ouerweening in himselfe?
A09106	Is not this singular falshood?
A09106	Is not this wilfull and malicious fraud?
A09106	Is one example of similitude sufficient to proue this?
A09106	Is there any man that will admit so violēt a fact as this?
A09106	Is there any man( I say) so simple or sottish, as not to see the impertinency of this manner of proceeding?
A09106	Is there any such ● hing in this verse?
A09106	Is this Manhood?
A09106	Is this for a man that so much abhorreth Equiuocation?
A09106	Is this good dealing?
A09106	Is this good dealing?
A09106	Is this intemperate speach befitting a Iudges person?
A09106	Is this opposit to Iesus or no?
A09106	Is this sincere?
A09106	Is this sincerity?
A09106	Is this sound Diuinity?
A09106	Is this the assurance of his vpright conscience, wherof he braggeth to his Maiestie?
A09106	Is this to be cōpared to the actions of Diuels?
A09106	Is this tollerable in a Minister of simple truth, who vaunteth to his Maiesty of the constant assurance of his vpright conscience?
A09106	Is this true?
A09106	It is deriued from the Lords Authority, or fr ● m the pr ● c ● pt of the Apostles?
A09106	It may be, some do but doubtingly defend it, what will yow iudge of these?
A09106	M. Fox in like maner, was he not of your profession?
A09106	M. Horne also, was he not of your profession?
A09106	May not all lawes of the Frenchmen be ascribed by this meanes vnto the Brittans?
A09106	May not euery man then( to vse his owne words) vnderstanding English presētly discerne the same?
A09106	May not the different lawes of diuers countries agree in some one case or other, without this inference, that therefore they are the same lawes?
A09106	Morton against it?
A09106	Morton to be so simple both in Grāmar, Law,& Deuinitie, as that he doth not know what difference there is betweene contumax and pertinax?
A09106	Morton?
A09106	Nay can the cōmon cōuersatiō of humane life be without it, where lying is auoyded?
A09106	Nay is it not rather babish Childhood, that semeth not to know the very first elements of true Diuinity?
A09106	Nay is not M. Morton cōuinced of euident fraud in setting downe this accusation?
A09106	Nay, where 〈 ◊ 〉 this man P. R. himselfe, the new select Aduocate ● or this cause?
A09106	Negligence?
A09106	Negligence?
A09106	Negligence?
A09106	Now then I would aske M. Morton whether he ● ad considered this or no, when he doth so reuell ● gains ● me with his rurall boy?
A09106	Now then what hath all this to do with Contumax haereticus tā praesumptus quàm mani ● estus?
A09106	Of whom and what causes must inquiry be made?
A09106	Or at leastwise mētioned the same in this his last Reply?
A09106	Or by his owne Doctors?
A09106	Or can any man excuse him from falshood and malice in this open treachery?
A09106	Or can ye meruayle, why I tooke this tytle of A quiet and sober Reckoning?
A09106	Or do Englsh Ministers trouble themselues much with such matters?
A09106	Or doe not the same things remayne in Holinshed, Hooker, Harrison, Thyn, and other wryters, aswell English as Scottish?
A09106	Or doe you not thinke that other m ● n will c ● n ● ● ● ● r what you speake, and vpon what groundes?
A09106	Or doth all this prooue that this was not their doctrine?
A09106	Or doth it prooue that these first ghospellers held it not?
A09106	Or doth not this also prooue him to be one of those forenamed Doctors that vnderstand not what they say, or wherof they affirme?
A09106	Or doth this proue that those Catholike Realmes do not acknowledge the Popes Ecclesiasticall Supremacy?
A09106	Or his subiectes contentment?
A09106	Or is Iohn Fox become of so little credit now with M. Mor ● ō, as to be shaken of so slieghtly, as heere he is?
A09106	Or is it not singular folly to call it by that name?
A09106	Or is it rather true, that you cut him of, and would suffer him to say no further?
A09106	Or is not Iohn Foxes credit in history as good, as that of Holinshed, especially when he affirmeth,& the other saith nothing?
A09106	Or is there any man so light& foolish, eyther Protesta ● t or Catholick, as will giue credit to so fond an assertion?
A09106	Or is there any one of these points, that prooueth any least falshood in me,& not rather all foure in him?
A09106	Or is your profession to speake, ● ● u care not what?
A09106	Or reason why this so ● otoriou ● a ly of M. Morton may not be condemned for willfull?
A09106	Or that he foūd so vniust a Iudge as would giue such a sentence so contrary to all conscience, sense, and reason?
A09106	Or were he a man tractable or conuersable in a common- wealth?
A09106	Or what reason can he alleadge for it?
A09106	Or what substance hath he, or may be presumed to haue for making this payment?
A09106	Or when do you thinke will he be able to answere this matter?
A09106	Or wherin may this be like to my cause?
A09106	Or who would suppose or inferre this but M. Morton?
A09106	Or why do you delude your Reader so?
A09106	Or why do yow corrupt your Author so?
A09106	Or why had not M. Morton so much as mentioned this condemnation by Bellarmine, seing it imported the matter so mightely?
A09106	Or will M. Attorney call this a Nihil dicit, whē the cause shall come before him in seat of Iudgment?
A09106	Or will Syr Edward Cooke be so vnreasonable in this behalf, as to request any man to belieue him that such a Iudgment was giuē for him?
A09106	Ouersight?
A09106	Ouersight?
A09106	Out of what conscience may it proceed?
A09106	Portugall Cruzadoes?
A09106	Secondly, there is willfull deceipt in leauing out the first wordes of the Author, Sed quòd dices, si iuraui?
A09106	Shall he be credited hereafter?
A09106	Tell me, brother, of what Priest was it euer heard, that he attempted a fact like vnto this of yours?
A09106	That I noted him to haue vsed and vrged Verè for Verò out of Carerius contrarie to the edition which I had of that booke?
A09106	That Popes can not be hereticks or be deposed for the same?
A09106	The ● oman is asked( saith he) sould you the land for so much?
A09106	These things, I say, do easely answere the flattering Ministers demand of, Gratious meeke Lady, what hath she euer done?
A09106	This is his Encomium: But what doth he giue?
A09106	This is the narration; what hath now Thomas Morton to say against vs?
A09106	This other is a new matter and from the purpose: whether there be other Authors that speake and write euill of Pope Gregory or no?
A09106	Thus farre this Charter, but now I would demaund what Syr Edward meaneth to proue heerby?
A09106	Thus goeth that Colloquy: and can any thing be set downe more in ● ulsely in so graue a matter, as we haue in hand?
A09106	To whom?
A09106	VVas it by chance or of purpose?
A09106	VVas it negligence, or ignorance?
A09106	VVas not this cra ● tie perfidious dealing?
A09106	VVe haue heard of their opinion, haue you any thing to except against their practise?
A09106	VVere not this a substantiall kind of arguing ou ● of the figure Synecdoche, which is Pars pro toto, a part for the whole?
A09106	VVhat excuse may be admitted in ● his place?
A09106	VVhat excuse( saith he) may P. R. now vse to free himsel ● e from falshood?
A09106	VVhat haue we to doe with thee ô Iesu?
A09106	VVhat meaneth, I say, M. Morton to de ● le so vnsincerely in such sort as euery child may see his fraud?
A09106	VVhat now?
A09106	VVhat therfore?
A09106	VVhere are they?
A09106	VVhere dwell they?
A09106	VVhere is( say you) his appeale vnto both Vniuersities?
A09106	VVhere is( say you) his challeng of Canoni ● ● s, and Schoole- Deuines?
A09106	VVherto I answere, that this is not the point in question, wh ● ther Lambertus did thinke, that they had excōm ● nicated him or no?
A09106	VVhich way will M. Morton turne himself heere?
A09106	VVho would reason so, or who would go about so to abuse his Reader, and himselfe, that had care of conscience or credit?
A09106	VVhy did he alter them?
A09106	VVhy did he not bring them forth with the rest?
A09106	VVhy had not he( if he had meant playnly and sincerely) set downe Bellarmines wordes as he found them in his text?
A09106	VVill you say( saith he) that it is an errour of Ignorance, ouersight, negligence?
A09106	Vpon what occasion?
A09106	WHETHER the Catholicke Deuine might be iustly condemned of a Nihil dicit, or no?
A09106	Was his store house so barren, that he had but one only example to bring forth, and that so farre fecht as from Cesar by a leap to our time?
A09106	Was it a vengeance of God to dye peaceably in his bed, through the feruour of holy desires to see the holy Land recouered?
A09106	Was it with the faces of Hierusalē and Iuda, or not rather of Sodome and Gomorrah?
A09106	Was not hanging for theft in vse also among the Brittans, Romans, and Grecians?
A09106	Was not this as necessary a subiect to be handled as to put himself to discusse the wit, memory, skill, and other qualities of his Aduersary?
A09106	Was there euer any English Iudge before the Apostacy of Martyn Luther, that gaue a Charge from the bench against such men, for being such?
A09106	Was this a change of lawes or no?
A09106	Was this diligence?
A09106	Was this iealousy of his owne infirmity?
A09106	Was this only ad ● aciendum populum, to hunt after popular applause?
A09106	Was this out of the infirmity of the flesh and pusillanimity, or rather out of couetousnes and iniquity?
A09106	We may say with Horace, Quid dignum tanto feret hic promissor hiatu?
A09106	Well then what was Costerus his meaning?
A09106	Were not his victorie the lesse in ouercōming so weake an aduersarie?
A09106	Were not the partie to be cast out as a tumultuous make- bate?
A09106	Were not their Cerimonies and Sacrifices a figure of our Sacramēts& Sacrifice?
A09106	Were not these things to be fulfilled aswell vpon earth as in heauen?
A09106	What answereth M. Morton?
A09106	What became of the other bookes of Knox?
A09106	What coherence hath this togeather?
A09106	What cuasion would they find to free themselues from these inconueniences?
A09106	What day will he appoint?
A09106	What dealing, what conscience, what truth is this?
A09106	What did it cōteyne?
A09106	What doth he now answere for the discharge of this imputation?
A09106	What extreme impudencie is this in a Myni ● ter?
A09106	What falshood is this then to alleadge Authors thus directly against their owne sense, meaning, and whole drift?
A09106	What haue you conuinced against me?
A09106	What haue you proued?
A09106	What haue you to say against them in this kind out of this place?
A09106	What obstinate?
A09106	What part of the naile do they hit?
A09106	What profit might my cause gaine therby?
A09106	What say you then of the precedent foure?
A09106	What shameles dealing then is this of our Mynister to charge Genesius with such folly or impiety which he neuer thought of?
A09106	What strang effect will so great words bring forth?
A09106	What then will you say of this ● ellow, and his manner of writing?
A09106	What time will he take?
A09106	What trick is this?
A09106	What wilfull falshood was there in me to note the error, which I found in my edition?
A09106	What will Syr Edward answere here for his Nihil dicit?
A09106	What will Syr Edward say to this?
A09106	What will you say?
A09106	What will yow say to this?
A09106	What would the say?
A09106	When lyued they?
A09106	When was it euer seene that the iudgment of the Church did take authority from the Emperour?
A09106	Where is his Chal ● enge of Canonists and School- deuines?
A09106	Where is ● ● s apeale vnto both our Vniuersities?
A09106	Where then remayneth the Charge of Perfidiae Reus?
A09106	Where was his Memorie, when he wrote this to impugne my Memorie?
A09106	Where was his Memorie, when he wrote this?
A09106	Where?
A09106	Wherefore hath Sathan tempted thy hart to ly vnto the Holy ghost?
A09106	Wherin then standeth this wilfull malice of mine?
A09106	Wherto the Reader may answere for me, that it is set downe in latin aboue twenty times: What excuse can he pretēd?
A09106	Whet ● er he spake this being in his feauer- fit, or in temper?
A09106	Whether in a dreame or a wake?
A09106	Whether in his right mynd, or in distraction?
A09106	Who then shall ryse in iudgement against T. Morton for all this wilfull lying?
A09106	Who would wrangle thus but M. Morton for lacke of better matter?
A09106	Why do they not change their opinions, and become Protestants?
A09106	Why had he not alleaged some one example or proofe before the Conquest as the Case and question required?
A09106	Why had he not answered to these things in this his last Reply,& opened his Apothecaries box which now he promiseth?
A09106	Why had he not giuen some satisfaction?
A09106	Why had not M. Morton put downe that referēce in his English text which most imported?
A09106	Why had not he alleaged the whole place out of Caesar as I haue done?
A09106	Why say you nothing of them?
A09106	Why then did he suppresse all the precedent clauses that do declare Costerus his purpose?
A09106	Will Sepulueda deny all those Fathers, alleadged by me before for our interpretatiō, to be Fathers?
A09106	Will any man belieue him, that this is conforme to any ancient law of England?
A09106	Will he recall his temerarious assertion?
A09106	Will he remember now his former saying, that Ignorance and bouldnes do commonly concurre?
A09106	Will he say it is lawfull to exclude him?
A09106	Will he say, that their exposition is cōtrary to all common sense?
A09106	Will he thinke it lawfull to admitt him, notwithstanding the diuersity of his religion?
A09106	Will not M. Morton be ashamed of this shift, and blush at the consequence?
A09106	Would not you thinke that he meant that we had none at all to obiect, no more against their practises then their doctrine?
A09106	Yea this intollerable impudency or impotency of malice, to vse his owne words?
A09106	Yea( Sir) and will you escape so?
A09106	You do accuse them that they haue diuers,& different expositions vpon the said Canon of the Councell of Eliberis?
A09106	Zechines of Venice?
A09106	against Pope Hildebrand, who is by them most highly commended?
A09106	all Protestants teach positions rebellious?
A09106	alleadge ● saith ● saith he) editions, translations, prints?
A09106	and all the Fathers expositions violented against their owne iudgement?
A09106	and doth not he cite sundry other places out of these very same authors which Syxtus Senensis hath not censured?
A09106	and haue not you found in D. Stapletons Counterblast 690. vntruthes, as in my booke also I noted vnto you?
A09106	and haue you not read him?
A09106	and if this be not any contradiction, as any child will confesse that it is not, why doth he seeke to abuse his Reader with such a fallacy?
A09106	and may do thrice as many more of those that ensued the other, if we would stand vpon it?
A09106	and may not a man aswell alleage S. Luke against S. Paul as Binius against this Pope in this cause?
A09106	and sincerly haue told his Reader that he did only relate the matter with this clause( vt fertur) as it is said?
A09106	and that in print?
A09106	and thirdly went about to deceiue his Reader by his false English translation?
A09106	any more in any thing that he alleageth, when this cōscienceles falsification is once discouered in him?
A09106	as namely in his Lords Court of the Arches?
A09106	but let him answere directly and substantially to this demaund?
A09106	by what law, Diuine or humane they are exempted?
A09106	calling this my curtesy a dram ● of sugar?
A09106	can this be defended from wilfull falshood knowne to the speaker?
A09106	can this be excused?
A09106	can this be thought tolerable?
A09106	cōceale this?
A09106	decketh his body with the best apparrell he can get?
A09106	demaunding the reason, how they could sweare or rather softweare in such manner, the thing being knowne to be so notoriously false?
A09106	did he not see& know that he fa ● sifyed manifestly the text of Bellarmine?
A09106	did hold himselfe very free from this perfidiousnes, who obiecteth the same so freely against vs?
A09106	doth Maldonate say any thing in this sentence that is not conforme to our Common doctrine of Equiuocation?
A09106	doth he thinke of what he writeth?
A09106	doth he thinke that only his Aduersary the moderate Answerer is such a deceaued Priest, as S. Paul pointeth at, or noe?
A09106	doth not Genesius himselfe in the very Chapter here cited alleage both S. Hierome and S. Augustine for this interpretation, and alloweth the same?
A09106	doth not S. Paul in the 9. an 10. of his first Epistle to the Corinthians set downe many examples to this effect?
A09106	doth not one affirmatiue witnesse constantly auouching any thing, prooue more then ten that hold their peace,& say nothing?
A09106	doth not this hit the nayle on the head also against M. Morton?
A09106	doth one particuler instance or action make a law, or proue a law with Syr Edward?
A09106	doth this serue to M. Mortons purpose for disgracing of Pope Gregory by Binius his testimony?
A09106	especially they being so few?
A09106	euen th ● rfore to ● eeke to preuent ensuing dangers, because they are contingent, and may be hera ● ter?
A09106	fareth delicatly?
A09106	fasteth seldome or neuer?
A09106	flattereth, raileth, lieth in this his Sermō against Catholicks, without all respect of truth, ciuility, or honesty?
A09106	for the falsification of M. Reinolds testimony: may this be called an exact reuiew of his owne works?
A09106	had this bene against common sense to haue alledged this excuse?
A09106	his officers) and how he could presume to haue more care of his owne credit, then of the others that is his head and Chiefteyne?
A09106	if the last only stricke the head?
A09106	is this repugnant to common sense and reason, as M. Morton affirmeth?
A09106	matter to the purpose or impertinent?
A09106	may he not say heerafter, I was a ● amed, and therefore I hid my selfe?
A09106	may he not say hera ● ter, I was ashamed, and hid my selfe?
A09106	may not there be in the selfe same sermon different sentences, and different senses vpon different occasions, and to different purposes?
A09106	on the head directly, insteed of the nayle,& most manifestly in the first, second and third Rules,& by all the different Cases therin resolued?
A09106	oposite also to Iesus himselfe, and conforme to those of Diuels, whome he bringeth in saying, quid nobis& tibi est Iesu?
A09106	or by sensible reasons?
A09106	or by what consequence of reason this commeth about?
A09106	or can this be condemned for a Nihil di ● it?
A09106	or fit to mānage any matter of importance, though otherwise neuer so learned, neuer so prudent, neuer so good, neuer so godly?
A09106	or is not this an assertion fit for one of those doctours, wherof S. Paul talketh, that vnderstand not what they say, or wherof they affirme?
A09106	or is not ● his equiuocating in the worst sense?
A09106	or what will you do with such men?
A09106	pampreth his flesh?
A09106	pestreth the Colledg ● with his brattes, which the founder neuer thought of?
A09106	print?
A09106	pursueth all wayes and meanes of ambition?
A09106	shall it be edition?
A09106	sincere or wrested allegatiōs?
A09106	sleepeth his fill?
A09106	the second, VVhether he may be thought to be a sufficient Proctor in this case or no?
A09106	the third, VVhether he hath suffici ● ncy to performe his taske?
A09106	their Circumcisions and washings figures of our Baptisme?
A09106	their Manna of our Eucharist?
A09106	to witt, that he will keepe the clause of Reseruation vnder a Latin lock, and that he neuer meant to locke it vp?
A09106	translatiō?
A09106	truth or falshood?
A09106	was it not a ● igure also of many things vpō earth, which should be fulfilled in the new Testament?
A09106	what exact& diligent cēsure did he vse in this reuiew?
A09106	what interest could I haue by it?
A09106	where now is that Iudge that gaue sentence ● or him in this behalfe, will he come forth& stand to his sentence?
A09106	wherof the one is a fault in obedience towards our Superiours, as now hath byn shewed, the other of tenacity of opinion, as before we haue declared?
A09106	whether his ● uckler or shield were sound?
A09106	who sayth so?
A09106	who will say so, that is indued with common sense?
A09106	whose finger did she euer cause to ake, and her hart aked not with him?
A09106	why had he not alleaged some examples of the continued vse and practise of the same throughout the raignes of the subsequent Kings, and Nations?
A09106	why then doth your Authour Frisingensis say that he fyndeth none excommunicated or depryued of his kingdome before Henry the 4. by Gregoy the 7?
A09106	wil he still cōtinue of forge new lyes against the Authors expresse wordes and meaning?
A09106	will M. Morton say that he saw not Costerus his meaning, or that he had not a ● alse meaning himselfe to deceaue his Reader?
A09106	will the Protestants receaue him or no?
A09106	will you haue it in Spanish Pistolets?
A09106	yea Prince of the Church?
A09106	yea a Chiefe Iudge?
A09106	yea and an impossibilitie of the contrarie, that they can be obedient?
A09106	● Vhat are their names?
A09106	● hat lacke of charitie can he find heerin?
A09106	● hy had you not alleadged one at least?
A09106	● s not this absurd and impious?