Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A91276	Robinson, Henry, 1605?-1664?
A70873	Robinson, Henry, 1605?-1664?
A70873	s.n.,[ London?
A56328	Shall the King?
A56328	Shall the Ministery be Judge?
A91179	Besides, how acheived the King of England such a Supreamacy above all law and the community it selfe, for whose behoofe law was made?
A91179	For by what power does the Parliament grant subsedyes to the King?
A91193	He may aswell suppose that Law civill may abrogate the Law of Nature?
A91193	What are these people ashamed of?
A31932	As for the main impediment in the D. of Lorrains businesse( which is his passage) why may thou not procure him passage through France?
A31932	What distinction can now satisfie us, that neither Irish, French, Lorrainers, Dutch, Danes, are forreiners?
A31932	or how can he deny it the name of a Parliament without hostillity?
A91231	And what more can be added?
A91231	But to what purpose is such violence, or what Justice can be in it?
A91231	Quae Regio in Terris, Nostri non plena cruoris?
A91231	Quantum erat, ut sineres toto nos corpore jungi?
A91231	Si duo, vel plures; dic ubi congeries?
A08939	And were not the people justly averse from it?
A08939	France subsists now without the regiment of the Sea, and why may not we as well want the same?
A08939	How is the King of France happy in his great Prerogative?
A08939	I. Iones indeed argues to this purpose: If the Law intrust the King with so great a power over mens persons, why not over their estates?
A08939	If they were not just, or reasonable, what needes such a fond subtiltie as this?
A08939	Why were they made at all?
A08939	or in that terrible stile of the King of Asses?
A08939	why should they not be fairely avoided by Law?
A56216	How did our Queen Mary ▪ even to the death, deplore the losse of one Town in Picardie?
A56216	Was Gaveston so deere to Edward the Second, because he was a good Patriot?
A56216	Why was the price of Strafford of greater esteeme then the peace of three Kingdoms?
A56216	With what regret then ought the king to look upon this unprecedented dysaster?
A56216	With what strange instruments did griefe make incision in her heart, whilest it would in grave the name of Callice there?
A56216	or whether his or the Parliaments resolution herein be more authenticall?
A91327	Grant to all without exception an open license to trade at large,& who will indure the strict duty and bondage of Apprenticehood?
A91327	How prodigiously did Antwerpe formerly in a very few yeares aggrandize it selfe?
A91327	How soon was Bruges in Flanders despoyl''d of its fame, and opulence after our Company withdrew from it?
A91327	The like or more grievous Complaints were revived by the Clothiers,& c. in Queen Elizabeths dayes, but what event did attend them?
A91327	and how many widowes, and poore families doth it constantly feed and refresh?
A91327	and how soon did Antwerpe transcend Bruges in fame, and opulence after our Commodities were stapled in Brabant?
A91327	and what an excesse of splendor has Amsterdam attaynd to since?
A91327	or why should that be dammage to us, which was profit to them?
A90100	But I wonder by what Act or Declaration the Parliament hath denyed a compensation to the sufferer in that kind, as the Question now stands?
A90100	But how could the Observator without affronting impudence speak otherwise?
A90100	But how should Presidents( as the Animadverso saith) be best warrants?
A90100	Consider the consequence, Such or such a Parliament did not or durst not doe this or that, therefore may no Parliament do it?
A90100	For what can those particular Acts of Law, which are to encrease our private and domestick profit advantage us?
A90100	Or is it true which the Bishops have so long pulpited at Court, that the razesing of their power must be the Ecclipse of the other?
A90100	Where then is the evill for which the Parliament must be so scourged by all sort of hands?
A90100	Wherein then hath the Parliament denyed the King that due which St Paul allows his Ruler?
A90100	and to make new purchases for us of all our estates?
A90100	or how should they be in the like degree limiting or binding that Oaths are?
A90100	so that the reforming& sweeping away of the one, must needs be the sweeping away of the other?
A90100	the Scots troubles) had being long before the Parliament had any; and then I pray, how could it be the cause of it?
A90100	why did we engage them so studiously to wipe off that Rust, which began to eate so deep into the letter of our lawes, and all our possessions?
A90100	— Risum teneatis amici?
A91220	And why can not the King judge and controle in the ordinary Courts?
A91220	Is not this to tell us that Mr. Ienkins is wiser then all the three Estates, though joyned together?
A91220	Is there any solidity in this objection?
A91220	Master Ienkins next sayes, that the King may revoke and discharge his Commissions at pleasure, but what of this?
A91220	Or is the seeking of the Kings concurrence nothing but a meer Complement?
A91220	That M. Ienkins is better able to judge of the two great Seales which is the true one, then the two Houses of Parliament?
A91220	the thirds time, as also that it is mischievous, otherwise by Protections, Priviledges,& c. Is not this to quarrell with the King and both Houses?
A91163	But is it so apparent that the Parliament is averse from peace?
A91163	Dares our Replicant make such a prayer?
A91163	Shall the King assigne to what Judges he pleases, the division of our quarrels?
A91163	Shall the King have all Forts, Ships, Armes, and Offices in his dispose?
A91163	To what purpose is it said?
A91163	What new Creed is there in all this, or what change of Religion were this, if there were any great numbers of men so opinionated?
A91163	Yet when did either King or Subject complaine of this arbitrary power?
A91163	if all this blood finde no pity in thee, yet is it an offence to thee, that it extorts teares and lamentations from us?
A91163	or shall he trust his Parliament in the choise and Approbation of persons intrusted?
A91163	when was it not held a good ground of War?
A56182	But is it so apparent that the Parliament is averse from peace?
A56182	Dares our Replicant make such a prayer?
A56182	Shall the King assigne to what Judges he pleases, the division of our quarrels?
A56182	Shall the King have all Ports, Ships, Armes, and Offices in his dispose?
A56182	To what purpose is it said?
A56182	What new Creed is there in all this, or what change of Religion were this, if there were any great numbers of men so opinionated?
A56182	Y ● t when did either King or Subject complaine of this arbitrary power?
A56182	if all this blood finde no pity in thee, yet is it an offence to thee, that it extorts teares and lamentations from us?
A56182	or shall he trust his Parliament in the choise and Approba ● ion of persons intrusted?
A56182	when was it not held a good ground of War?
A91339	10 What is the Good or Conveniency of Aristocracy?
A91339	11 What is the Ill of Aristocracy, or the Inconvenience to which it is Lyable?
A91339	12 What is the Good, or Convenience of Democracy?
A91339	13 What is the Ill of Democracy, or the Inoonvenience to which it is Lyable?
A91339	15 What Priviledges doth the King chalenge to himself?
A91339	16 For what end is this Authority trusted to the King, and Placed in him?
A91339	17 To what purpose especially are the priviledges of the house of Commons and the house of Peeres?
A91339	4 What kind of government then is that of the state of England?
A91339	5 If the Government be Regulated, why do men tell us that the King is above all Law?
A91339	6 Is this Regulated and mixt Monarchy, as good as an Absolute Monarchy, or better, or worse?
A91339	8 What is the Conveniency or Good of Monarchy?
A91339	9 What is the Ill of Absolute Monarchy?
A91339	And what Greater Faction or Division can there be, then such as Divide between King and Parliament, and between the House and their Members?
A91339	Are there any of these Simple Formes perfect?
A91339	But have the two Houses Power to put their judgements into Execution, as well as to Impeach and Iudge?
A91339	By whom was this government framed in this sort?
A91339	HOW many Simple kinds are there of Civill Government of States, and Common- wealths?
A91339	Is the State of England governed by any one of these kinds simply?
A91339	Q 18 What are the speciall priviledges of the House of Commons towards this?
A91339	What is the speciall Priviledge of the House of Peers in the former Case of such Favorites and Followers of the Kings as are Impeached by the Commons?
A91339	Yet if all would have come away at call, had it not been Dissolved for want of Legall Numbers Remaining?
A91339	or the Inconvenience to which it is Lyable?
A91339	or who is to be accounted the Immediate Efficient of the Constitution thereof?
A56345	( asketh by way of Interrogation) What right had Will, the Conqueror, the Father of all our glorious Tyrants?
A56345	But if it so happen( for its a meer chance) ▪ that the next heir prove somewhat more then ordinary capable, yet what the next may prove, who knows?
A56345	But what need I mention him?
A56345	Can reason think or dream, that Majesty will not eat out sincerity?
A56345	Can we think(& retain our memories and reasons) that Charls the Second can forget Charls the First?
A56345	If it be asked, as Speed doth, What right had William the Conqueror?
A56345	Must those Pretences be Sacred which have only the Ordination of a more keen and glittering sword?
A56345	What right( we speak, saith he, of a right of equity) had his son William Rufus, and Henry the first, while their elder brother lived?
A56345	and a confirmation by Custome be thus Divine?
A56345	but supposing his right, What right had these, who so many times cut off the line, and made themselves the Stock of future succession?
A56345	or that Presbytery can flourish in that state where Prerogative is the ascendant?
A56345	that custom and education can easily be altered?
A56345	then it must follow, What right had all the rest?
A56345	will Episcopacy dye in England, when Kingship is set up?
A56168	And do not his Successors give likewise as much as they receive, when they conferre the like acts of Grace?
A56168	Besides, whom doe they represent?
A56168	But do therefore such immunities granted to the people, cause the King to derive his power and right from the people?
A56168	But however I le see his reason: What''s that?
A56168	But they must have a right to their power in this case of distresse; Whence have they that?
A56168	But why so?
A56168	By what right?
A56168	Did not the Peoples consent at first make Kings, and conveigh power into their hands?
A56168	For how could Sacraments be administred, and the word preached?
A56168	How shall these men be bound to do right, who so easily untie the knots of these sacred bookes of Law and Oathes?
A56168	If it be asked, But what availeth the names of these great Monarches, without their Kingdomes or Dominions?
A56168	Is he alone able to doe it without the people?
A56168	Is it not possible that they may( in time) finde a power in themselves of declaring that obligation void, as well as they have done the other?
A56168	No?
A56168	Statutes are not binding to them, why then should Parliaments?
A56168	The King alone?
A56168	The name of a King is great, I confesse, and worthy of great honour; but is not the name of a People greater?
A56168	Truely Sir, not solely: but grant it, what then?
A56168	What?
A56168	Would Christ have concealed, or did he at any time conceale the truth for feare of the Jewes accusations?
A56168	never such power in the whole body?
A56168	or have they not their vocation from God, because they have not extraordinary calling?
A56168	they seeme to be more interessed then the King, because it concernes their salvation or damnation; is it injustice therefore to deny it?
A56168	with what justice?
A91254	Alas, what is there, that can escape your exception?
A91254	And if so, what issue, what effect can Justice have?
A91254	Moreover, p. 121. when He told you the Commissioners could not bear any further delays from you, you return''d presently, Will you not give me breath?
A91254	Neither did our Saviour, being examined before Pilate concerning his regall interest, give an evading Answer: Pilates question was, Art thou a King?
A91254	Tell me then seriously, is this contumelious spirit that rages in you the same that possessed Christ and his Disciples?
A91254	What an unlimited liberty do you take to your self?
A91254	Who ever heard of such dallying capritioes before in any Court of Justice?
A91254	You having no proofs, nor colourable presumptions to offer, that there were indeed any such mistakes?
A91254	a presence to try and passe upon you?
A91254	and of a Judge quatenus a Judge, as well as there is of a pezant quatenus a pezant, and of a Juror, quatenus a Juror?
A91254	and you that can not offend, why should your face be stained with that ordinary tincture of modesty that abashes other men?
A91254	how will Treasons like Hydraes- heads spring forth?
A91254	nay does it not extend to the securing, and preserving( as far as is possible) of every man in every due right?
A91254	or is there not something that is the proper interest of a Gentleman quatenus a Gentleman?
A91254	pag: 81. and to confute Judge Nicolls, He adds, What a lying Judge is this Mr. Nicolls?
A91254	who ever heard of any Judges hands bound up before by the like nugatory cavillations of any Prisoner whatsoever?
A91254	yet by what Law of God, or man, is it lawfull for such a common person as you are to machinate against it?
A56223	Am I supream, and yet you above me?
A56223	And how doe this devest and disable the King?
A56223	And is all His great partie of Clergymen, Courtiers, Souldiers,& c. constant?
A56223	And when the same Allegiance is performed, The same Supremacy of power confessed to be now in the King over the Militia, as has ever been?
A56223	Could this be, If all Parliaments were not taken as deadly enemies to Royalty?
A56223	Is the King true to Himself?
A56223	Is the Law it self subject to your Votes, that whatsoever you say, or do, shall be lawfull, because you declare it so?
A56223	Is the main body of the Kingdom loyall?
A56223	Is the main body of the Parliament loyall?
A56223	Must my power be governed by your discretion?
A56223	Or may the person himself take away the thing he trusts when be will, and how he will?
A56223	Or were Alexander, Pyrrbus ▪& c. the more honoured or beloved, because they were independant?
A56223	Statutes are not binding to them, Why then should precedents?
A56223	That according to some Parliaments, they may depose the King?
A56223	The King makes this question thereupon?
A56223	The Parliament desires no removeall of that power which was in the King, But that which was in such or such a Substitute?
A56223	Were Hannibal, Scipio ▪& c. the lesse honoured or beloved because they were not independent?
A56223	What a strange unlathomable machination, and work of darknesse is this?
A56223	What higher Law then have we remaining then the Kings will?
A56223	What will Nero more despise, then to condescend as Antoninus did?
A56223	are they not more servile then other inferiour Courts; nay, are they not in a worse condition then the meanest Subject out of Parliament?
A48309	And since the Redemption, what work hath God ever performed more noble, and for ever to be exalted then the Reformation?
A48309	And why then does our Mother the Church maintaine her authority against her own scrupulous and tender- minded infants?
A48309	But to passe over Temporall businesses, how violent have our Bishops beene in their own Canons about Ceremonies, and indifferencies?
A48309	But what?
A48309	Can Puritans, speake worse of any, than he doth of Puritans?
A48309	Crudelis Mater magis, an puer improbus ille?
A48309	Did hee condemne all Scots alike, or all Bishop haters alike, or joyne the English in like condemnation?
A48309	Did not King James know his owne enemies, or how to blame them?
A48309	For examples sake, how many differences have we even about indifferent Ceremonies; and that meerly amongst Protestants?
A48309	For why should I burn with indignation against another, because he is lesse understanding then I am?
A48309	If God does not give me so much grace as he does thee, wilt thou say, He gives me not that which he accounts sufficient?
A48309	Is it honorable for the Nurce to contest about authority with a forward Childe, when by indulgence she may better still it?
A48309	Is this the blame of the Churches indulgence to weake brethren in nice scruples?
A48309	It is true, the Church had Bishops before in its times of persecution, but of what power or pompe?
A48309	What could have beene raked out of Hell more slanderous to our Religion, more Apologeticall for Popery?
A48309	and if I am not in this or that so unblameable as thou art, wilt thou say, my grace generally is not equall with thine?
A48309	and in that glorious worke who was anoynted by God for a more egregious charge then Calvin?
A48309	and what disturbance hath that violence produced?
A48309	can the meere love of knowledge make me abhorre ignorance more in another then in my selfe?
A48309	did they conclude these fruits, good?
A48309	for what was that worke, but a reviving of lost salvation, and a new restauration of the buried Gospel amongst us?
A48309	if thou exceedest me in all other vertues, and yet art by me exceeded in humility alone, wilt thou upon this proceede to censure me?
A48309	or did they conceive that such fruits might grow upon a good stocke?
A48309	or make me arrogate more freedome from errour to my selfe, then to other men?
A48309	or why should I so farre presume upon my selfe, if I think I am liable to errour, as well as other men?
A48309	what might they judge of the root, from whence these fruits sprung?
A48309	where Gods Will is truely understood, but his commands are wholy slighted?
A48309	where men know like Christians, but live like Heathens?
A56187	1 To whom can it be more proper to give the rule over men, then to him who is the onely King truly and properly of the whole world?
A56187	And if it arrive not at the efficacy of a true medium, how can we imagine it an end in any respect whatsoever?
A56187	And if it be, then why not inferior to the King, as well as to the Parliament?
A56187	And if the intent of Brutus be dubious, who shall determine that, but such as have the same authority now, as Brutus then had?
A56187	But soft, what have we to doe with a meer Divine?
A56187	Hereupon it is much controverted, whether Servitude be agreeable to Nature, or no?
A56187	How diametrically opposite is this to that which our State- Theologues doe now buzze into the Kings eares?
A56187	If it hath not, what a maime, what a losse is this?
A56187	If it hath, how can such mis- improvement thereof be answered to God, or justified in Policie?
A56187	Kings, Priests, Prophets were anointed, but no fourth thing: and since Priests and Prophets are sacred by immediate constitution, why not Kings?
A56187	Now if our Preacher may except Germany out of his Text, why not England, unlesse He will appeale to something beyond his Text?
A56187	O that our Courtiers at Oxford would admit of such politicks, and blush to publish any directly contrary?
A56187	Servi sunt?
A56187	Servi sunt?
A56187	Servi sunt?
A56187	Try us by this law; and what could either the Saxon, Dane, or Norman pretend against this whole nation?
A56187	What ridiculous things are these?
A56187	What then is to be done?
A56187	and if England, why not others?
A56187	and may bind now, where he did loose; or loose now, where he did then bind?
A56187	how poore a fallacy is this?
A56187	is all supremacy of one man abjured, or onely such a supremacy as Tarquin chalenged?
A56187	must such a fond dreame as this confound us in an eternall night of Anarchy, and forbid us to wind up our weights again?
A56187	must the wheeles of government never move againe except some miraculous ordinance from heaven come to turne, and actuate them?
A56187	who had chief Honours?
A56187	who had the communication of secret State- affairs?
A56187	who had the prime sway in Court amongst the Romane Emperours, but slaves infranchised?
A91392	And if every private man stand so responsible for his particular interest in the Truth, being equally great in the Truth?
A91392	And yet why doe they not appeare as ridiculous in Italy, as in England?
A91392	Did Constantine gaine the style of Head- Bishop, or Bishop of Bishops meerely by permitting the true worship of God?
A91392	For how shall this be tryde?
A91392	For if the King shall abide the judgement of this Bishop, or that Consistory, yet what judgment shal that Bishop or Consistory abide?
A91392	How ridiculous are the Popes anathemaes to those which renounce his allegiance, they seem to us but meere Epigrams sent abroad to provoke laughter?
A91392	If God gave infallibility to one Bishop, for the availe of all the world, why doth not that Bishop availe the whole world?
A91392	In the last place therefore if her power or headship were absolute, why did not her Bishops uphold and declare the same?
A91392	Nay what bloud wil she not procure?
A91392	O why should his mercy bee more narrow, then his vertue?
A91392	Shall they be sollicitous for transitory things, and yet trust their soules into other mens hands, who may make a profit of the same?
A91392	Shall they consult of the beauty and glory of the kingdom, and transfer Religion to others, which is the foundation of all happines?
A91392	Shall they sit to treate of Lether, and Wooll, and neglect doctrine and discipline?
A91392	What could Gods children suck from their brests other then milke, then sincere, spirituall milke?
A91392	What more sacred, what more spirituall offices could they performe in the Church?
A91392	Why are not all men illuminated by it?
A91392	Why is so great a light put under a Bushell?
A91392	Why rather is it not an ease and comfort to them, that they have now leasure more seriously to attend their own proper function, and ministration?
A91392	You will say then how is that denomination given him so peculiarly?
A91392	and if not, why does he pretend so much?
A91392	doth meer power ad to the knowledg of Priests?
A91392	how comes this vast irreconcilable difference betwixt the government of the Church and State?
A91392	how shall it appeare, whether these oppressions be true, and hainous, or no?
A91392	if the Popes keyes be potent enough for both these purposes, why does he not force all men to come in within his sheepfold?
A91392	if their vertue extend no further then to exhortation, why do they urge commands upon us?
A91392	if they have a commanding power, why do they not second it with due compulsion?
A91392	or is the power of Priests more virtuous for the promoting of truth, then the power of Magistrates?
A91392	what priviledge ha''s Peter more then Iohn?
A56284	A strange objection, have not the Irish been prosecuted by us these nine yeers as Enemies?
A56284	And does not one of the primary Lawes of Warre teach them what a hazard it is to deny right to him that beares his ● aked sword in his hand?
A56284	And how can any man imagine, but that strange disorders must needs follow and abound in a Church so deserted?
A56284	And if their pretended weapon had really no such vertue in it, why do they brandish it so ludicrously onely to dazle our weak eyes?
A56284	And though they owe allegiance de jure to England: yet are they not as mortall Enemies de facto to us, as to the Scots?
A56284	But now since in favour of his Son the former interpretation is resumed the second time: how has the case been altered?
A56284	But who can imagine they ever beleeved themselves herein?
A56284	But why should they suspect any designe in us of suppressing this Letter?
A56284	Can we then imagine, that Conscience Gods resident in the Soul is divided against it self?
A56284	Could the Scots imagine that either Rupert at Sea, or the Irish Papists by Land would obey such a revocation so signed at Dunferlin?
A56284	Curs''d man, what canst Thou hope for, what desire?
A56284	Do not we know, that such a revocation is meerly ● udic ● ous, and jocular?
A56284	Do we any way abet, justifie, or spare them?
A56284	Do we not all know, that his graces towards us ha''s made him the lesse acceptable to the English?
A56284	Else, what makes them so zealous against our receiving of right now, which pretend they were so zealous against our receiving of wrong then?
A56284	Is that a naturall, indispensible principle in England, which is not so in Scotland?
A56284	May a Prince be reduced from his publick capacitie, and when He is made a private person shall he be treated so, as no private person may be treated?
A56284	May he not prevaile over a faction of Covenanters, and by them assaile us, as Hamilton did?
A56284	May not this King do what Hamilton did?
A56284	My Lord, and Gentlemen: shall pure reformed Religion want an Advocate in this presence?
A56284	Shall he be subjected to clandestine, unlawfull proceedings, belowe the right of a common person, because He was once more then a common person?
A56284	Shall we call the Papists blinde zeal which makes him thirst after Protestant blood an erroneous conscience?
A56284	The Considerator will say: if I have my dissatisfactions both wayes, how shall I extricate my self either way?
A56284	Was the Laity ever worse bridled, when it was the Popes Asse?
A56284	What is this but to tell us; that they are more truly Judges in England of Treason, perjurie, usurpation,& c. then we?
A56284	What property, when we have lost the independency of equals?
A56284	Will not God in earnest look down upon the makers of such jests?
A56284	and disdains the use of masks?
A56284	and does not the whole world taxe us of our ill requitall at Newcastle?
A56284	and is not Conscience a sufficient Judge of things so evident, and indubitable?
A56284	and revered as Gods resident?
A56284	and shall the Magistrate forbear all force, and restraint towards Him, because He onely follows the dictates of an erroneous conscience?
A56284	does not this high pitch of prejudice become a faire noble enemy?
A56284	especially when the Act is to passe as a Grace from our Masters in Scotland, and not of reconcilement from us?
A56284	for what right can remain to us, whilest we are subjected to their forces, what freedome, whilest we are to be judged by their discretion?
A56284	how shall I ingage, or not ingage without sin, since neither ingaging, nor refusing is of faith with me?
A56284	if there was any correcting, restraining, healing, recovering vertue in that weapon, why did they uncharitably forbear to use it?
A56284	is it not in this case my safest course to obey that instinct, or prompting of my conscience which is most powerfull, and least opposite to faith?
A56284	is not this a thing evidently, and indubitably evill?
A56284	nay what discharge is this to any of that Nation?
A56284	or can we imagine, that that trumpet which sounds points of war so contrary is to be obeyed, above all Laws, and Ordinances?
A56284	or how can confusion of interests be introduced, where there remains a coordination so equally, and justly preserved?
A56284	or how can they challenge more by vertue of this Covenant- union in England, then we do in Scotland?
A56284	that''t was not injurious in them to condemne us, nor seditious in the people to rise up against us in observance of their commands?
A56284	why did they not pitie those multitudes of Innocents that perished daily under his fury?
A56284	why did they suffer the King himself to run on, and die in his persecutions?
A56149	6. use the name both in the act, and in the writ granted thereby: but what?
A56149	And grant all, yet what doe all these Paradoxes conclude for any particular kinde of worship?
A56149	And if Saint Ambrose would so extrude an annoynted Emperour at Mill ● ine, what would the Pope himselfe have done at Rome?
A56149	But grant this, and then where is the Doctors religious, middle worship betwixt civill, and divine?
A56149	But let the Doctor goe on: why should any slave be more vile in the hight of his Lord, then wee before God?
A56149	But what an argument is this?
A56149	But what consequence is this?
A56149	But will D. Lawrence say, is not this the doctrine of the seditious Corahs of this age?
A56149	Caecilius askes Octavius, Cur nullas aras habent, templa nulla, nulla nota simulacra?
A56149	For by what Law did Saint Ambrose confine the Emperour to the body of the Church?
A56149	How does this conclude?
A56149	How easie had it beene, and how true,& how necessary was it to have made this direct answer?
A56149	How many Kings ha''s this doctrine formerly dethroned?
A56149	I pray what can be more worthy to bee adored in the whole world, then such a representation?
A56149	I will aske the Doctor this question: Was the Temple at that time de jure Jewish, or Christian?
A56149	If Altars were onely in use, why was such incredible cost pow ● ed out upon Tables?
A56149	If so, then what becomes of Princes?
A56149	If the Jewish devotions had beene now fully consummated, who had beene more fit to enter into the Holiest, then He and his Disciples?
A56149	Is it sufficient for the Doctor to say, as things have beene in esteeme, so religious persons have ever esteemed them?
A56149	Is the vertue of Christs bloud only annexed to the Sacrament?
A56149	Shall God loose part of his honour from us, by sending his Sonne to us?
A56149	So is it therefore a sinne to take the wall of the Altar when we pray?
A56149	Was Moses sawcy, or Joshua,& c. when he ascended up into the Mount within the cloud, and brightnesse of God?
A56149	What is the reason of it, that the Gospell should bee introduced to the detriment and prejudice of temporall authority?
A56149	Why did he not enter and draw the vaile, and dissolve that partition as after he did?
A56149	Why is our Saviours raigne over us now called in the Scripture, the Kingdome of Heaven?
A56149	and how is it, that they speake so pleasingly of Numerianus?
A56149	and if it did, how could our Priests prove hence such worship as they now challenge due to the Altar?
A56149	and if so, is all the honour of the Sacrament in the consecration, and nothing in the distribution?
A56149	and if so, is the vertue of the Sacrament affixed to the Altar place?
A56149	and if so, must that place bee infallibly in the upper end of the Chancell?
A56149	does not this doctrine make all persons alike holy, and all places, and so confound all order in Religion?
A56149	expecting there a greater blessing, or a perfecter memory of my Saviour?
A56149	how does this tautologie confute us?
A56149	if such a pious Bishop would be so insolent and distoyall, what would the Bishop of all Bishops have done?
A56149	is not the place where the people receive, of some sanctity, as well as that place where the Priest blesses it?
A56149	may not Baptisme, and the Preaching make us partakers of Christs bloud, and merits, except wee actually receive the Eucharist?
A56149	or how can he prove that any Orthodoxe Doctors in the Primitive times did worship the Gospells, or Crosse of our Saviour?
A56149	or if thi ● be a sinne, can it be no wayes avoided, but by the Altar posture?
A56149	or must I bow at my entrance with lesse reverence, and then bow more lowly at the Altar afterwards?
A56149	or was the Congregation more reverent, and obsequious when they durst not so much as lift up their eye after Moses, because of the terror of God?
A56149	or what Incense could have beene more sacred in that place then his prayers?
A56149	was Moses or Christ to take place in it?
A56149	what must be the severall measures of my worship?
A56149	what warres and calamities has it imbrued the whole world withall?
A56149	when it first brought Christians downe to the Clergies feete, how many heresies did it broach?
A56149	withall, how many myriads of Soules did it at the same instant sinke into the Lake of Hell?