trigram

This is a table of type trigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

trigram	frequency
the holy ghost	935
the divine nature	914
of the trinity	842
and holy ghost	783
of the father	769
of the divine	716
that there is	659
the unity of	654
of the same	623
the doctrine of	604
and the same	598
doctrine of the	585
that it is	585
one and the	542
of the son	517
as well as	511
unity of the	487
son of god	478
there is no	473
the son of	465
to be the	463
in the same	460
is but one	455
three divine persons	438
it is not	422
the father is	417
the nature of	412
but one god	388
as to the	385
according to the	378
of the church	375
of the holy	374
the divine persons	370
of the godhead	351
the name of	348
to be a	347
i do not	341
the father and	339
as it is	339
the three persons	337
not to be	334
father and son	334
is not the	331
this is the	331
there is but	325
there are three	322
and the holy	321
that the father	316
which is the	312
and the son	311
persons in the	307
the son and	304
in the godhead	298
there is a	297
son and holy	296
the son is	296
that there are	295
god the father	293
it is a	291
the three divine	289
the person of	288
that he is	280
there can be	279
is to be	278
out of the	277
clear and distinct	270
said to be	270
that they are	266
and it is	264
person of the	259
can be no	257
if it be	257
that the son	256
of his own	255
of the word	255
with the father	254
each of them	252
in the world	252
the spirit of	251
the notion of	247
it may be	246
it is the	246
early english books	243
the substance of	240
the divine essence	236
the same thing	232
of the world	231
and this is	230
the holy spirit	230
father and the	229
from the father	227
in the beginning	225
is the same	225
be but one	224
one of the	220
a trinity in	218
to the son	214
the same god	213
the same nature	208
to the father	207
he tells us	207
and of the	206
the idea of	204
no more than	203
of the christian	203
they are not	203
nature of the	199
is in the	196
english books online	195
part of the	195
it is impossible	192
trinity in unity	191
in the divine	190
the church of	187
true and perfect	187
three distinct infinite	185
is not a	183
that which is	182
and therefore the	181
it to be	181
the catholick faith	180
be the same	180
the formal reason	179
and in the	179
formal reason of	178
of a man	177
in the next	175
are not three	174
of the spirit	174
and perfect god	173
the blessed trinity	171
but it is	171
substance of the	170
that he was	170
as much as	170
a trinity of	169
the catholick fathers	168
so much as	168
the very same	168
in respect of	167
if there be	166
the power of	165
notion of a	165
in the trinity	164
because it is	164
it must be	163
for it is	163
as i have	163
of the fathers	162
there must be	160
the manner of	159
in the first	158
in the unity	158
that god is	158
soul and body	157
the truth of	157
agreement or disagreement	157
the same with	156
the sense of	156
ought to be	154
could not be	154
the authority of	153
be said to	152
he is the	152
three persons in	152
of god is	151
to the divine	151
the catholick church	151
have the same	151
sense of the	151
of a trinity	150
to the same	149
of the three	148
are but one	148
that it was	148
in answer to	147
we do not	147
the christian church	146
which is a	145
text creation partnership	145
this is a	145
to each other	145
unity of nature	144
based on the	144
the christian faith	144
distinct infinite minds	143
to have been	143
to be three	143
to be so	143
they do not	142
we have no	142
at the same	141
and that the	141
the word was	140
in opposition to	140
of the deity	140
it is to	140
the reason of	139
in the father	139
only true god	139
in his own	139
as they are	139
of a person	138
him to be	138
holy ghost is	137
in the name	137
the same in	136
of all the	136
three distinct persons	135
as he is	135
the same time	135
more than one	134
persons of the	134
and therefore i	134
and distinct ideas	133
the same body	132
or disagreement of	132
the agreement or	132
to be one	132
can be but	131
from each other	131
notion of the	131
a divine person	131
the word of	130
of the doctrine	130
i am sure	130
the author of	129
the true god	129
by no means	128
the only true	128
as far as	128
and the like	127
is said to	126
to be in	126
which it is	126
the athanasian creed	126
of the soul	125
that this is	125
in this matter	125
divine nature is	124
faith of the	122
of the catholick	122
son and spirit	122
in it self	122
them to be	122
there may be	121
are three distinct	121
he is not	121
the knowledge of	121
on the other	120
some of the	120
to all the	120
account of the	120
that of the	120
that the divine	119
there is nothing	119
that can be	119
is the true	119
the way of	119
the use of	118
it cannot be	118
not the same	118
that the three	117
it is in	117
the glory of	117
in such a	117
way of certainty	117
is the only	116
reason of personality	116
and to be	115
divine persons are	115
the beginning of	115
is to say	114
can never be	114
of a spirit	114
from one another	113
three persons are	113
are to be	113
the word person	113
the next place	112
as to be	112
but this is	112
the distinction of	112
by way of	112
the faith of	112
the same divine	112
vindication of the	111
of certainty by	111
perception of the	111
the form of	111
that the same	111
that we may	111
with respect to	111
of the whole	110
because they are	110
thing to be	110
to be god	110
what it is	109
but in the	109
of the first	109
there is one	109
of all things	109
that i have	108
are the same	108
it is no	108
it will be	108
the perception of	107
is not to	107
of the agreement	107
to be understood	107
the foundation of	107
divine nature and	107
name of the	107
we are to	107
if it were	107
what i have	107
i have already	106
the same one	106
three infinite minds	106
that the soul	106
all three persons	105
which is not	105
answer to the	105
made use of	105
your lordship has	105
there was a	105
of the blessed	105
so that the	105
and therefore we	104
i know not	104
was in the	104
the mean time	103
if this be	103
holy ghost are	103
of the thing	103
which your lordship	103
as the father	103
the god of	102
the union of	102
in the mean	102
of the other	102
every one of	102
it is certain	102
the holy trinity	102
word of god	101
the meaning of	101
person in the	101
of it self	101
be able to	100
the new testament	100
is a very	100
the same substance	100
for the same	100
not in the	99
the essence of	99
of which is	99
by it self	99
the cause of	98
one of them	98
of god in	98
because he is	98
of the body	98
god and man	98
keying and markup	97
of the most	97
all that is	97
your lordship says	97
to prove the	97
that is to	97
disagreement of ideas	97
this is not	96
in the son	96
either as utf	96
the same person	96
the same individual	96
to be true	96
and therefore it	96
i will not	96
each of which	96
and identity of	96
but one person	96
i have said	96
characters represented either	96
so far from	96
represented either as	96
marked as illegible	96
use of the	95
distinction of persons	95
it would be	95
of our saviour	95
the difference between	95
must be a	95
we must not	94
church of england	94
that in the	94
it is so	94
he is a	94
an answer to	94
nature in the	94
of the said	93
the trinity and	93
which we have	93
it is evident	93
we are not	93
i shall not	93
and that he	93
the vnity of	92
certainty by ideas	92
of any thing	92
the same kind	92
to be of	92
nature of god	91
of the lord	91
these three are	91
as for the	91
who is the	91
and holy spirit	91
be in the	91
reason of the	90
it should be	90
and that is	90
of the mind	90
is no more	90
only begotten son	90
are three gods	90
which is in	89
for there is	89
the father of	89
if he had	89
of the persons	89
there should be	88
the divinity of	88
spirit of god	88
himself to be	88
one true god	88
there is an	88
of our lord	87
that we are	87
that the word	87
be a person	87
not so much	87
in order to	87
in the deity	86
can have no	86
nature and essence	86
and not to	86
nothing else but	86
so as to	86
there is not	85
power of god	85
that christ is	85
according to his	85
of one god	85
and by the	85
and the other	85
be three distinct	85
of the unity	84
what is the	84
but that the	84
that we have	84
is not so	84
persons to be	84
is called the	84
and the father	84
the humane nature	84
minds or spirits	84
the most perfect	84
explication of the	84
he does not	84
the other two	84
in the perception	83
of the truth	83
was with god	83
as in the	83
and all the	83
he could not	83
mystery of the	83
my way of	82
is it not	82
to which i	82
the belief of	82
that your lordship	82
sameness of nature	82
i am not	82
by the word	81
in the body	81
of a thing	81
an infinite mind	81
of the gospel	81
whether it be	81
of god the	80
in the holy	80
may be said	80
contrary to the	80
the rest of	80
unity of god	80
and to the	80
nature and substance	80
but what is	80
and that in	80
god the son	80
of such a	80
but one and	80
of our faith	79
and therefore they	79
to the holy	79
there are not	79
in the scripture	79
identity of nature	79
sameness and identity	79
it is said	79
that there was	78
in the three	78
divine persons in	78
god in the	78
and the word	78
to make it	78
of the words	78
in these words	78
to make the	78
the being of	78
the love of	78
are one god	78
and if the	78
in this case	77
that is not	77
are in the	77
in the church	77
the certainty of	77
divine nature in	76
the mystery of	76
essence and substance	76
make use of	76
that all the	76
as we have	76
it be so	76
and there is	76
with reference to	76
common to all	76
article of the	76
that is the	75
must be three	75
that he has	75
in the very	75
nature of a	75
i humbly conceive	75
and that it	75
is true and	75
we can have	75
who is god	75
i think it	75
in like manner	74
it is that	74
they may be	74
the same purpose	74
is a contradiction	74
and what is	74
on the contrary	74
from the dead	74
in the most	74
way of ideas	74
in all the	74
he would have	73
that i am	73
as there is	73
by the same	73
name of god	73
the first place	73
and if we	73
is as much	73
of the law	73
the words of	72
the old testament	72
and in this	72
trinity of persons	72
the will of	72
an account of	72
to the nature	72
the trinity is	72
the force of	72
well as the	72
they are all	72
they are three	72
same divine nature	72
of god to	72
which is to	72
i cannot but	71
that the fathers	71
three are one	71
be no more	71
nothing can be	71
not three gods	71
to be found	71
there was no	71
that these three	71
and therefore he	71
the same reason	71
the spirit is	71
they must be	71
the end of	71
the nicene fathers	71
and for the	71
is impossible to	71
which i have	71
god with the	71
and if he	71
christ to be	71
father is god	70
is one god	70
the christian religion	70
of the substance	70
must needs be	70
idea of a	70
the one true	70
all things were	70
vnity of the	70
ought not to	70
to be believed	70
the divine substance	70
of persons in	70
and the spirit	70
be the formal	69
it can be	69
is no other	69
the father to	69
idea of god	69
as your lordship	69
the one god	69
in this sense	69
that they have	69
cannot be the	69
in the nature	69
mind or spirit	69
to be an	69
give me leave	69
can be made	69
the body of	69
and one god	69
authority of the	69
is a god	68
or any other	68
a plurality of	68
to the purpose	68
is the father	68
of the earth	68
where there is	68
the persons of	68
distinct from the	68
take notice of	68
in the case	68
the holy scriptures	68
seems to me	68
to his own	68
so far as	68
is a person	68
they are the	68
the terms of	68
state of the	67
concerning the trinity	67
the council of	67
for they are	67
he did not	67
the other side	67
from all eternity	67
all of them	67
of them is	67
that he had	67
be three persons	67
that they were	67
the world was	67
there are a	67
for div a	67
notes for div	67
heaven and earth	67
not at all	67
i have not	66
son to be	66
essence of god	66
author of the	66
god is one	66
when applied to	66
that the holy	66
crave leave to	66
three distinct substances	66
to do so	66
an act of	66
and so i	66
and therefore if	66
god is not	66
to the other	66
as a man	65
it is very	65
one of these	65
more than a	65
true and proper	65
the son to	65
are three persons	65
far from being	65
persons are three	65
it was not	65
it does not	65
defence of the	65
he will not	65
each of the	65
the perfection of	65
a contradiction to	65
he doth not	65
is of the	65
the ancient fathers	65
will not be	65
the soul is	65
blessed for ever	64
three distinct minds	64
a part of	64
a great many	64
that if the	64
if he can	64
there be three	64
the same numerical	64
from all other	64
according to this	64
must be the	64
when it is	64
and must be	64
all the three	64
what your lordship	64
though it be	63
of the person	63
any of the	63
in our minds	63
for their own	63
nature and person	63
seems to be	63
of the nature	63
we have of	63
lord jesus christ	63
of the new	63
have but one	63
respect to the	63
is common to	63
idea of substance	63
the testimony of	63
god is the	63
the first and	63
to shew that	63
is not this	63
to one another	63
begotten of the	63
to say that	62
i must tell	62
persons in one	62
it to the	62
the son was	62
not the son	62
into the world	62
if your lordship	62
and not the	62
as i can	62
from the other	62
the time of	62
they did not	62
that is in	62
union of the	62
agreeable to the	62
in a word	62
is given to	62
if the father	62
it is an	62
and if they	61
it is as	61
reference to the	61
same in all	61
father is the	61
was made flesh	61
so great a	61
he must be	61
is the most	61
notion of one	61
that in all	61
a true and	60
such as are	60
father are one	60
ever blessed trinity	60
which was the	60
made by him	60
of a mind	60
a great deal	60
without the least	60
to make a	60
be one god	60
the same man	60
a number of	60
a specifick unity	60
so it is	60
therefore it is	60
as to make	60
of soul and	60
the only begotten	60
one supreme god	60
in the person	60
opposition to the	60
modes of subsistence	60
of their own	60
the resurrection of	60
thought fit to	59
that to be	59
be three gods	59
is such a	59
essential to the	59
thing it self	59
generation of the	59
in each other	59
is the son	59
but there is	59
them in the	59
or at least	59
yet it is	59
of these two	59
is not only	59
with the same	59
by reason of	59
the thing it	59
never have been	59
of a god	59
belong to the	59
know not what	59
but i shall	59
for us to	59
of these three	59
that we cannot	58
in one another	58
any one of	58
to this purpose	58
there be any	58
of its own	58
there are two	58
come to the	58
to prove it	58
it is true	58
is necessary to	58
distinction of the	58
one individual nature	58
the lord christ	58
person of christ	58
of time and	58
son of the	58
essence of the	58
is essential to	58
they are one	58
the first edition	58
the existence of	58
to be proved	58
in the second	58
of his father	58
the works of	57
in the right	57
in the old	57
inconsistent with the	57
the difference of	57
you do not	57
do not see	57
are not to	57
for if the	57
copies of the	57
the first of	57
attributes of god	57
substance in the	57
not three distinct	57
that he should	57
god blessed for	57
upon the same	57
the light of	57
is so far	56
order of nature	56
the father in	56
we cannot conceive	56
to the doctrine	56
principles of reason	56
and if it	56
if they were	56
are not the	56
the account of	56
lord iesus christ	56
divinity of the	56
as if he	56
end of the	56
one single person	56
one divine nature	56
but that he	56
then it is	56
by the spirit	56
is that which	56
any thing else	56
and therefore of	56
to prove that	56
he was not	56
will of god	56
should not be	56
and no more	56
any thing of	56
if there were	56
not the father	56
is the person	56
in the new	56
the same infinite	56
in the way	55
the number of	55
and i am	55
to the world	55
of it is	55
the nature and	55
would not be	55
the second person	55
the true nature	55
resurrection of the	55
in order of	55
it in the	55
if there was	55
owned by the	55
which i shall	55
is the first	55
the subject of	55
the honour of	55
of which we	55
onely true god	55
body of christ	55
knowledge of the	55
as appears by	55
i would have	55
and therefore this	55
any more than	55
the mysteries of	54
may not be	54
and is not	54
of three distinct	54
same god with	54
since it is	54
no such thing	54
his own nature	54
god to be	54
the same common	54
the incarnation of	54
and if this	54
some of them	54
and the reason	54
edition of the	54
one would think	54
to it self	54
the same manner	54
i shall only	54
and yet the	54
would not have	54
is impossible for	54
to all three	54
which may be	54
the word is	54
it is plain	54
neither of them	54
to have a	54
true nature of	54
trinity in the	54
united to the	54
difference between the	54
of the one	53
we have a	53
they cannot be	53
the whole world	53
if they be	53
divided into two	53
as to say	53
by the father	53
and so the	53
out of his	53
by the holy	53
christ is the	53
can be the	53
is one and	53
is capable of	53
would have been	53
of the texts	53
of it in	53
of nature in	53
and that which	53
are said to	53
applied to the	53
in the mind	53
the object of	53
he was the	53
as it were	53
to be but	53
what he says	53
as hath been	53
numerical unity of	53
as opposed to	53
nature of christ	53
to the terms	52
signification of the	52
the lord of	52
is very good	52
the true and	52
which are not	52
be said of	52
i have given	52
the proof of	52
a distinct person	52
grounds of certainty	52
power of the	52
and therefore is	52
that a man	52
but one divine	52
of any other	52
truly and properly	52
the question is	52
that they may	52
which we are	52
by his own	52
but the same	52
of the work	52
there cannot be	52
to give a	52
that i may	51
before the world	51
unity of a	51
of the old	51
both of them	51
such thing as	51
a clear and	51
belongs to the	51
form of baptism	51
three distinct gods	51
that according to	51
up to a	51
in the highest	51
the charge of	51
a man is	51
each of these	51
and that this	51
me leave to	51
of the incarnation	51
and god the	51
by your lordship	51
that i do	51
that he might	51
of one and	51
article of faith	51
to the first	51
if he be	51
any such thing	51
in which the	51
more than the	51
the sacred trinity	51
about the trinity	51
the ideas of	51
as we are	51
with it self	51
us to believe	51
is the very	50
be of the	50
wisdom of god	50
and such as	50
as for instance	50
consists in the	50
although there are	50
it had been	50
the process of	50
of nature and	50
and those which	50
no reason to	50
to each of	50
it be not	50
to their original	50
in all likelihood	50
reason to do	50
his own person	50
do not say	50
three persons of	50
the principle of	50
when we say	50
it shall be	50
a vindication of	50
was divided into	50
is nothing else	50
by which the	50
i am the	50
the lord god	50
a person is	50
aware of the	50
when he was	50
is the greater	50
as this author	50
of creative commons	49
is available for	49
of the period	49
in one and	49
tiff page images	49
to the three	49
therefore chose to	49
work described above	49
online text creation	49
encoded edition of	49
the work described	49
for keying and	49
institutions providing financial	49
tcp assigned for	49
which did not	49
even for commercial	49
coded from proquest	49
keyed and coded	49
proquest page images	49
keyboarded and encoded	49
iv tiff page	49
available for reuse	49
bear in mind	49
pfs batch review	49
was intended to	49
in the blessed	49
if a man	49
scanned from microfilm	49
and markup reviewed	49
way of speaking	49
so that it	49
these texts for	49
described above is	49
text can be	49
assigned for keying	49
and xml conversion	49
were returned to	49
support to the	49
to be as	49
above is co	49
i text is	49
this keyboarded and	49
perfectly the same	49
financial support to	49
there are no	49
distributed and performed	49
god of god	49
text and markup	49
and i think	49
be made about	49
can be copied	49
text transcribed from	49
do not think	49
because there is	49
in the th	49
will not allow	49
be understood of	49
parts of the	49
the institutions providing	49
by the institutions	49
speak of the	49
on the new	49
between god and	49
for commercial purposes	49
and coded from	49
reviewed and edited	49
the early english	49
will never have	49
is no such	49
a letter to	49
of god and	49
the text can	49
books online text	49
certainty by reason	49
which is all	49
terms of creative	49
all the rest	49
a second or	49
encoded text transcribed	49
one infinite mind	49
and therefore chose	49
sampled and proofread	49
text is available	49
and encoded edition	49
the worship of	49
without asking permission	49
images scanned from	49
of creating the	49
all without asking	49
returned to the	49
markup reviewed and	49
this phase i	49
they could not	49
from proquest page	49
providing financial support	49
your lordship to	49
is an infinite	49
phase i text	49
to the early	49
kb of xml	49
must have a	49
sdata character entities	48
the personality of	48
by converting tcp	48
should be aware	48
accuracy and those	48
given to their	48
a compelling reason	48
a limit of	48
and encoded texts	48
made about the	48
record of the	48
of the project	48
general aim of	48
to be redone	48
be marked as	48
encoding based on	48
tei p using	48
create diplomatic transcriptions	48
available at the	48
works in english	48
opposed to critical	48
history of the	48
have been looked	48
create accurately transcribed	48
page images in	48
such instances will	48
text with mnemonic	48
therefore of any	48
michigan and oxford	48
eligible for inclusion	48
for an anonymous	48
simplify the filling	48
mnemonic sdata character	48
level of the	48
a numerical unity	48
are a number	48
for accuracy and	48
of michigan and	48
the filling in	48
the tei in	48
reflect the true	48
in libraries guidelines	48
use these texts	48
to external keying	48
users should bear	48
tcp is to	48
of every monographic	48
between the universities	48
external keying companies	48
text was proofread	48
phase of the	48
mainly structural encoding	48
remain and some	48
characters will be	48
english were prioritized	48
by editorial teams	48
texts for their	48
the tcp texts	48
an anonymous work	48
each text was	48
and markup guidelines	48
data is very	48
into the public	48
in oxford and	48
in other languages	48
to the keyers	48
known extent have	48
quality assurance was	48
notably latin and	48
p using tcp	48
were encoded and	48
extent have been	48
illegibles were encoded	48
processed by university	48
transformed into placeholder	48
editorial teams in	48
or lossless xml	48
work was chosen	48
of a works	48
should bear in	48
while the overall	48
project was divided	48
unicode or tei	48
trinity and incarnation	48
have been issued	48
possible up to	48
restraints of time	48
tcp aimed to	48
at the text	48
accordance with level	48
in mind that	48
and or corrected	48
for transcription and	48
the universities of	48
limit of instances	48
the keyers to	48
be the true	48
aimed to produce	48
by a tcp	48
been released into	48
of the print	48
university of nebraska	48
but that it	48
the distinction between	48
using tcp tei	48
make clear that	48
by proquest via	48
transcribed and encoded	48
their own purposes	48
unicode or text	48
were encoded as	48
in accordance with	48
and available in	48
the new cambridge	48
likelihood such instances	48
should make clear	48
i have done	48
from father and	48
time and funding	48
all the world	48
created during phase	48
and use these	48
their early english	48
universities of michigan	48
all likelihood such	48
subsistence of the	48
are available at	48
a wide variety	48
that there can	48
the publisher proquest	48
about the data	48
any remaining illegibles	48
accurately transcribed and	48
usually the first	48
but we respectfully	48
as of january	48
meet qa standards	48
the text encoding	48
of instances per	48
and sometimes a	48
were corrected where	48
are eligible for	48
the usual project	48
we ought to	48
and therefore there	48
and basic encoding	48
to tei p	48
or tei g	48
instances per text	48
chosen if there	48
creating the tcp	48
into placeholder characters	48
to produce large	48
of gaps by	48
were sent to	48
compelling reason to	48
been transformed into	48
released into the	48
did not meet	48
of each text	48
of the tei	48
the texts have	48
gaps by user	48
him in the	48
texts were encoded	48
illegible were corrected	48
sets published by	48
usual project restraints	48
editions of a	48
of any assumptions	48
later edition of	48
latin and welsh	48
works in other	48
of mutual consciousness	48
a works in	48
was chosen if	48
first editions of	48
and this i	48
quality of tcp	48
selection was based	48
number of works	48
was then carried	48
ought to have	48
to create accurately	48
elements to simplify	48
out by editorial	48
enhanced and or	48
remaining illegibles were	48
appears in ncbel	48
texts created during	48
the print record	48
some errors will	48
to simplify the	48
errors will remain	48
where possible up	48
the public domain	48
be aware of	48
cambridge bibliography of	48
to facilitate morpho	48
encoded texts based	48
any assumptions that	48
edition of a	48
project restraints of	48
a partnership between	48
keyers to be	48
been issued variously	48
processes should make	48
the image sets	48
some readable characters	48
is a partnership	48
structural encoding based	48
title published between	48
issued variously as	48
to a limit	48
oxford and michigan	48
textual data within	48
between and available	48
language title published	48
new cambridge bibliography	48
or later edition	48
instances will never	48
quantities of textual	48
every monographic english	48
or corrected and	48
encoding was enhanced	48
on the text	48
standards were returned	48
is to encode	48
if an author	48
large quantities of	48
and linked to	48
or elements to	48
was enhanced and	48
range over a	48
or for an	48
encoded and linked	48
intended to range	48
their original source	48
we respectfully request	48
to create diplomatic	48
corrected where possible	48
to take notice	48
a tcp editor	48
characters or elements	48
do not understand	48
i need not	48
of subject areas	48
their works are	48
the text creation	48
markup guidelines are	48
wide variety of	48
linked to page	48
and oxford and	48
variety of subject	48
have been released	48
of a work	48
second or later	48
in english were	48
files to tei	48
credit and attribution	48
shall not be	48
of the two	48
changes to facilitate	48
works are eligible	48
aim of eebo	48
the overall quality	48
strings within braces	48
ascii text with	48
selection was intended	48
will be marked	48
tei in libraries	48
images in accordance	48
the general aim	48
as gap s	48
by user contributors	48
request that due	48
for want of	48
will remain and	48
those which did	48
been looked at	48
a work was	48
of tcp data	48
carried out by	48
and some readable	48
during phase of	48
to page images	48
texts have been	48
now take and	48
assurance was then	48
of the process	48
mind that in	48
companies for transcription	48
i do here	48
sent to external	48
attribution is given	48
tcp data is	48
lincoln and northwestern	48
due credit and	48
assumptions that can	48
respectfully request that	48
the encoding was	48
anyone can now	48
users should be	48
overall quality of	48
can now take	48
that due credit	48
variously as sgml	48
over a wide	48
qa standards were	48
image sets were	48
of known extent	48
this is all	48
as illegible were	48
chose to create	48
early works to	48
print record of	48
a state of	48
by university of	48
then carried out	48
divine worship to	48
be found in	48
in of gaps	48
texts based on	48
was a compelling	48
take and use	48
whichever is the	48
and attribution is	48
text encoding initiative	48
the texts were	48
published between and	48
tcp is a	48
process of creating	48
filling in of	48
included and sometimes	48
to range over	48
elements of known	48
on the image	48
created by converting	48
image sets published	48
and characters marked	48
not meet qa	48
partnership between the	48
with mnemonic sdata	48
project have been	48
public domain as	48
tcp project was	48
converting tcp files	48
teams in oxford	48
tei g elements	48
must tell him	48
of english literature	48
placeholder characters or	48
within the usual	48
glory of god	48
produce large quantities	48
keying companies for	48
at by a	48
the trinity in	48
then their works	48
to be worshipped	48
sometimes a second	48
to reflect the	48
or text strings	48
text selection was	48
published by proquest	48
corrected and characters	48
these processes should	48
encoded as gap	48
to encode one	48
creation partnership web	48
data within the	48
was based on	48
to critical editions	48
via their early	48
looked at by	48
have been transformed	48
gap elements of	48
oxford and the	48
sets were sent	48
available in eebo	48
of textual data	48
partnership web site	48
publisher proquest to	48
understanding these processes	48
bibliography of english	48
proofread for accuracy	48
was proofread for	48
the project have	48
proquest to create	48
with changes to	48
of works in	48
tcp files to	48
into two phases	48
encode one copy	48
text strings within	48
readable characters will	48
proquest via their	48
characters marked as	48
with level of	48
domain as of	48
and the publisher	48
there is the	48
transcription and basic	48
guidelines are available	48
that we can	47
foundation of the	47
i crave leave	47
but on the	47
for this reason	47
but if he	47
because they have	47
the onely true	47
the credibility of	47
there is any	47
out of my	47
and therefore not	47
the work of	47
so that if	47
it seems to	47
have no other	47
three persons and	47
of three persons	47
is all that	47
to be considered	47
both of the	47
infinite minds or	47
the mind of	47
from the original	47
a man of	47
and that they	47
is nothing but	47
such a thing	47
which cannot be	47
the image of	47
god is a	47
the truth is	47
if they are	47
that the whole	47
god of israel	47
a common nature	47
which i answer	47
the persons are	47
father is not	47
in the notion	47
for this is	47
of a body	46
father of our	46
be the son	46
and for this	46
can be more	46
for all that	46
with all the	46
to be begotten	46
and each of	46
the wisdom of	46
the fathers and	46
may be a	46
our lord jesus	46
this was the	46
divine persons to	46
was to be	46
the creation of	46
it has been	46
of the second	46
the help of	46
in this point	46
use of it	46
do not know	46
in the whole	46
but i must	46
each of whom	46
any thing to	46
in point of	46
but your lordship	46
manner of subsistence	46
is the one	46
where it is	46
communion of the	46
part of it	46
it will not	46
together with the	46
but as to	46
the godhead of	46
as there are	46
from the body	46
that christ was	46
not capable of	46
of the schools	46
can no more	46
the father alone	46
i doubt not	46
not of the	46
to them all	46
r ocm this	45
same common nature	45
may as well	45
christ and his	45
consciousness and mutual	45
that there should	45
the soul and	45
beginning of the	45
to be made	45
ocm this keyboarded	45
with his father	45
all that i	45
this is that	45
these three persons	45
and power of	45
singularity of the	45
the explication of	45
which are the	45
from it self	45
he might have	45
and that there	45
but let us	45
from whence it	45
two or three	45
and all other	45
in the doctrine	45
estc r ocm	45
what is it	45
our lord iesus	45
said to have	45
if the son	45
part of his	45
words of the	45
and but one	45
reproduction of original	45
we know not	45
in the other	45
as if they	45
of this matter	45
there shall be	45
a real trinity	45
in three distinct	45
things were made	45
of original in	45
are capable of	45
love of god	45
the fulness of	45
vitally united to	45
was the word	45
united into one	45
us in the	45
as it was	45
in one person	45
that are in	45
the ever blessed	44
the grace of	44
said of the	44
of one substance	44
is a great	44
substances in the	44
the judgment of	44
and he that	44
being in the	44
in his book	44
he that is	44
perfection of the	44
is due to	44
all that he	44
when they are	44
and then the	44
but by the	44
articles of faith	44
as he says	44
for that is	44
answer to this	44
the soul in	44
i desire to	44
the principles of	44
to your lordship	44
in the word	44
the doctrin of	44
he may be	44
testimony of the	44
of this author	44
for my part	44
saith the lord	44
of the ancient	44
any thing in	43
all that the	43
that one and	43
respect of the	43
may be in	43
of an infinite	43
idea of it	43
upon this subject	43
the defence of	43
in what sense	43
and i shall	43
to make them	43
to have the	43
of the eternal	43
in the sense	43
explications of the	43
i did not	43
that he hath	43
which is so	43
nor is it	43
would be a	43
necessary to be	43
and as for	43
or of the	43
from the beginning	43
glory of the	43
doctrin of the	43
what he has	43
but one single	43
and spirit are	43
to give an	43
the eternal generation	43
in another place	43
in our selves	43
to shew the	43
obscure and confused	43
must not be	43
not able to	43
all the same	43
that he did	43
can there be	42
and i do	42
belonging to it	42
of the athanasian	42
could not have	42
let us now	42
in the christian	42
the eternal son	42
i take to	42
the fountain of	42
made the world	42
he is in	42
which we call	42
this one god	42
an article of	42
i must confess	42
in any other	42
the perfections of	42
but that which	42
is it possible	42
true and real	42
the state of	42
there is in	42
to such a	42
the son the	42
either of them	42
notion of it	42
of our own	42
a way of	42
but the son	42
take to be	42
same individual nature	42
as the son	42
of the question	42
of jesus christ	42
son is not	42
desire to know	42
is the spirit	42
the first person	42
the godhead is	42
whole and entire	42
and my father	42
whether there be	42
method of certainty	42
there is between	42
there are some	42
of them in	42
that we must	42
personality of the	42
as long as	42
the articles of	41
account of this	41
so that there	41
the communion of	41
and yet there	41
that which was	41
and yet this	41
in the flesh	41
unity in trinity	41
that we should	41
of whom is	41
is not god	41
that he may	41
any thing that	41
at that time	41
the history of	41
in a state	41
to the soul	41
that there may	41
he has not	41
we may be	41
word was made	41
and therefore in	41
let us see	41
new way of	41
these three divine	41
same with the	41
were made by	41
we speak of	41
in all three	41
for i am	41
rest of the	41
between the divine	41
the supreme god	41
give an account	41
as he has	41
son and the	41
one god with	41
i come to	41
which this author	41
these are the	41
essential properties of	41
and they are	41
of the god	41
what is this	41
and that of	41
and all that	41
capable of being	41
gods than one	41
word was with	41
after the manner	40
this author has	40
nature or essence	40
of what he	40
simplicity of the	40
that those who	40
reason to believe	40
distinction between the	40
they are in	40
is nothing in	40
of my book	40
made up of	40
the possibility of	40
more gods than	40
they are but	40
image of god	40
to any one	40
that by the	40
substance of his	40
proper and peculiar	40
know not how	40
the singularity of	40
persons and one	40
as not to	40
so in the	40
of a different	40
jesus christ is	40
than that of	40
think fit to	40
but that there	40
must be as	40
and i will	40
he was in	40
it is this	40
speaking of the	40
man and his	40
that though the	40
it doth not	40
substance of god	40
the father be	40
if i should	40
persons are one	40
those words of	40
it self to	40
in the last	40
that it may	40
but that is	39
the essential properties	39
or can be	39
for all the	39
which he had	39
this is what	39
for me to	39
the father hath	39
image of the	39
but they are	39
and i hope	39
if he were	39
nature of things	39
we have not	39
the lord thy	39
i have no	39
to his father	39
as to his	39
might have been	39
no other god	39
and therefore as	39
and here i	39
as the other	39
cannot be one	39
to the body	39
far as i	39
yet they are	39
son is god	39
nothing to the	39
a mind to	39
there are many	39
nature is not	39
the acts of	39
such an one	39
the law of	39
is a distinct	39
a kind of	39
the opinion of	39
yet there is	39
the lord jesus	39
answer to which	39
no more of	39
as if it	39
that i know	39
by a mutual	39
in the former	39
holy ghost to	38
in which it	38
things of god	38
word was god	38
between the father	38
i and my	38
as may be	38
not have been	38
each other in	38
is not in	38
in that place	38
in which he	38
perfections of the	38
have all the	38
to which he	38
from the divine	38
the son in	38
but that they	38
in other words	38
the beginning was	38
the signification of	38
i shall be	38
that the world	38
the same sense	38
in each of	38
but if the	38
of the man	38
son and h	38
be applied to	38
for he is	38
person to be	38
to us in	38
to give the	38
it is possible	38
of personality in	38
is all one	38
to the common	38
in three persons	38
and that we	38
is but a	38
it was the	38
say that the	38
the parts of	38
the same essence	38
spirit of the	38
the divine word	38
he should be	38
subsist in the	38
and therefore to	38
specifick unity of	38
in the least	38
this to be	38
which they are	38
they are so	38
that we know	38
he would not	38
this is my	38
such an union	38
mysteries of faith	38
to the former	38
by the name	38
that jesus christ	38
may be one	38
of his being	38
begotten son of	38
the reason why	38
but one substance	38
my self to	38
only in the	38
distinct idea of	38
yet but one	38
lord thy god	38
of the true	38
it could not	37
being of god	37
to the reader	37
thing in the	37
but we must	37
he had not	37
to speak of	37
to the notion	37
that the nature	37
to be known	37
nothing at all	37
his divine nature	37
certainty in the	37
that which makes	37
even in the	37
nor the holy	37
is the proper	37
might as well	37
relating to the	37
but before i	37
for that which	37
son in the	37
one and three	37
he is god	37
as he was	37
to any other	37
nor can be	37
and son are	37
there is none	37
have a clear	37
with each other	37
word and spirit	37
the evidence of	37
but i am	37
we have the	37
which he has	37
they would have	37
supposed to be	37
at any time	37
one who is	37
same nature with	37
proof of the	37
a matter of	37
son of man	37
of the virgin	37
it is one	37
the first commandment	37
the original text	37
that it cannot	37
by which he	37
the one supreme	37
lord god of	37
nature of man	37
must of necessity	37
and son to	37
and therefore that	37
the unity and	37
trinity to be	36
in the following	36
may be so	36
of the sun	36
and unity of	36
is the whole	36
and now i	36
these two things	36
therefore we must	36
are one and	36
be not a	36
is meant by	36
the common nature	36
of his nature	36
and when he	36
act of the	36
but the divine	36
and mutual consciousness	36
your lordship in	36
that the spirit	36
divine person is	36
to make this	36
of the scripture	36
baptized in the	36
that it should	36
contained in the	36
by vertue of	36
of these words	36
he is called	36
can be said	36
that as the	36
so that this	36
wisdom of the	36
my notion of	36
rule of faith	36
the first is	36
eternal son of	36
of dangerous consequence	36
and therefore must	36
in regard of	36
they were not	36
by the catholick	36
necessary to salvation	36
of all other	36
on the account	36
and distinct idea	36
real distinction of	36
of the unitarians	36
idea of the	36
is there any	36
in the midst	36
and therefore cannot	36
as to this	36
and that i	36
the true catholick	36
which must be	36
that the doctrine	36
and the earth	36
the design of	36
upon this account	36
to the spirit	36
leave it to	36
and if so	36
of the dead	36
i have now	36
not to the	35
original text notes	35
the holy and	35
catholick faith of	35
thus it is	35
the living god	35
in the form	35
persons are not	35
of those who	35
fountain of the	35
and we are	35
the father only	35
to be that	35
at all to	35
he should have	35
we cannot comprehend	35
these words of	35
absurdities and contradictions	35
the midst of	35
notion of certainty	35
those who have	35
necessary to the	35
so that we	35
so that here	35
text notes for	35
as he calls	35
a man may	35
in the scriptures	35
it is necessary	35
is not an	35
of divine worship	35
each person is	35
they are to	35
and yet that	35
church of rome	35
definition of a	35
a meer man	35
this is no	35
nothing in the	35
to what he	35
difference between them	35
is contrary to	35
to talk of	35
an immaterial substance	35
in the present	35
no man can	35
and for that	35
such as the	35
who is not	35
is not one	35
articles of the	35
your lordship will	35
of the divinity	35
against the socinians	35
of father and	35
the title of	34
but of the	34
to be called	34
unity of essence	34
which is no	34
and as to	34
be more than	34
of the resurrection	34
to that of	34
he speaks of	34
sensation or reflection	34
is between the	34
that god the	34
reason of this	34
or to be	34
that they should	34
is the divine	34
the necessity of	34
is one of	34
by this author	34
when he is	34
what is said	34
to be done	34
for the future	34
could be no	34
no more but	34
the order of	34
applied to god	34
between father and	34
for as much	34
which is but	34
the trinity to	34
wisdom and power	34
the whole trinity	34
is inconsistent with	34
but i have	34
conscious to each	34
cannot but be	34
such a manner	34
the article of	34
essence or substance	34
have been the	34
the sum of	34
is the cause	34
but if it	34
they will not	34
from all others	34
to me to	34
that this author	34
else but the	34
down from heaven	34
to do it	34
a power of	34
of the creation	34
substance with the	34
in them all	34
and yet but	34
for the first	34
his only begotten	34
none of them	34
that which i	34
reason of it	34
an unity of	34
are three men	34
he ought to	34
but one man	33
according to their	33
truth of the	33
that of a	33
not only a	33
to give us	33
of them are	33
what hath been	33
and wisdom of	33
for the father	33
much as to	33
be no other	33
be pleased to	33
in matters of	33
there were no	33
that he will	33
and much less	33
and if there	33
the soul to	33
he shall come	33
one divine person	33
in this very	33
and i have	33
they would not	33
flesh and blood	33
is pleased to	33
true notion of	33
but one nature	33
the definition of	33
holy spirit is	33
the divine attributes	33
therefore i shall	33
be not the	33
they have the	33
three in the	33
which i think	33
i should be	33
be a distinct	33
any of them	33
beginning was the	33
divine essence is	33
be true and	33
yet there are	33
the sameness and	33
which makes a	33
is a man	33
it is but	33
as soon as	33
that three persons	33
and from the	33
the reader to	33
of the apostles	33
that such a	33
the names of	33
point of reason	33
there is such	33
to the contrary	33
it is most	33
but if you	33
of what is	33
and the divine	33
as we can	33
for such a	33
the character of	33
was not the	33
for what is	33
belonging to the	33
this or that	33
to the person	33
out of it	33
holy and ever	33
of any one	33
of which i	33
the generation of	33
and on the	33
to the unity	33
to the lord	32
in the place	32
matters of faith	32
a thing is	32
there be but	32
him from the	32
that no man	32
that this was	32
by the son	32
if we consider	32
to the whole	32
the compass of	32
of that which	32
the language of	32
for if we	32
of which the	32
that he would	32
they should be	32
of the things	32
in defence of	32
that the church	32
is a thing	32
your lordship means	32
before he was	32
and as the	32
he seems to	32
may be the	32
what he had	32
common to them	32
the son be	32
i should have	32
what is meant	32
forms of speech	32
what we call	32
a difference between	32
that you have	32
would have it	32
which he hath	32
to understand the	32
meaning of the	32
not a person	32
which i am	32
idea of matter	32
was the son	32
being of a	32
not only the	32
which he was	32
if he pleases	32
identity of the	32
it is manifest	32
go about to	32
to those who	32
my idea of	32
the consideration of	32
of the idea	32
to express the	32
from the nature	32
son is the	32
and to make	32
what they are	32
contradiction to say	32
of a real	32
substance or essence	32
and the whole	32
the body is	32
the children of	32
he is so	32
were to be	32
which is an	32
sense of scripture	32
the whole divine	32
which he is	32
one in nature	32
but such as	32
or that the	32
the satisfaction of	32
hath been proved	32
the sun and	32
to find out	32
of such an	32
a person of	32
individuals of the	32
this way of	32
to the church	32
one of his	31
been pleased to	31
and so he	31
he goes on	31
i think i	31
one only god	31
and infinite mind	31
a mutual consciousness	31
of the nicene	31
impossible to be	31
that the unity	31
much as the	31
he calls it	31
i confess i	31
but if we	31
may be taken	31
of the term	31
the most high	31
to prove this	31
men and angels	31
according to our	31
way of reasoning	31