This is a table of type quadgram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.
quadgram | frequency |
---|---|
one and the same | 516 |
the doctrine of the | 496 |
the unity of the | 384 |
doctrine of the trinity | 347 |
the son of god | 341 |
of the divine nature | 329 |
there is but one | 316 |
the three divine persons | 277 |
and the holy ghost | 241 |
son and holy ghost | 233 |
the father and the | 224 |
of the holy ghost | 214 |
early english books online | 195 |
unity of the godhead | 192 |
the person of the | 183 |
father and the son | 181 |
there can be no | 176 |
true and perfect god | 166 |
unity of the divine | 166 |
the formal reason of | 163 |
that there is but | 158 |
of the divine persons | 155 |
a trinity in unity | 149 |
in the unity of | 147 |
that there are three | 140 |
three distinct infinite minds | 140 |
at the same time | 133 |
the agreement or disagreement | 131 |
agreement or disagreement of | 131 |
clear and distinct ideas | 130 |
the son and holy | 129 |
that the father is | 129 |
in the name of | 129 |
the holy ghost is | 128 |
is but one god | 127 |
that there is a | 121 |
can be but one | 119 |
the only true god | 115 |
of the doctrine of | 113 |
the substance of the | 111 |
in the next place | 111 |
that there is no | 107 |
of the christian faith | 104 |
perception of the agreement | 103 |
in the mean time | 102 |
the nature of the | 102 |
the name of the | 101 |
formal reason of personality | 100 |
the divine nature is | 99 |
be said to be | 99 |
person of the father | 99 |
the perception of the | 97 |
in the divine nature | 97 |
three persons in the | 97 |
represented either as utf | 96 |
characters represented either as | 96 |
of a trinity in | 95 |
of the blessed trinity | 95 |
of the agreement or | 94 |
that the son is | 93 |
of the divine essence | 93 |
persons in the godhead | 92 |
of the church of | 91 |
and holy ghost are | 89 |
the church of england | 88 |
and the same god | 87 |
or disagreement of ideas | 86 |
in the perception of | 83 |
the son and spirit | 83 |
to the divine nature | 82 |
of the same kind | 82 |
the word of god | 79 |
the divine nature and | 79 |
that it is not | 78 |
of the same nature | 78 |
three divine persons are | 77 |
that is to say | 77 |
but one and the | 77 |
the unity of god | 76 |
is not to be | 76 |
and this is the | 74 |
way of certainty by | 73 |
substance of the father | 73 |
the spirit of god | 73 |
of the unity of | 73 |
of the son of | 72 |
as well as the | 72 |
the faith of the | 72 |
to the same purpose | 72 |
each of which is | 71 |
the father is god | 70 |
the father and son | 70 |
in the first place | 70 |
of certainty by ideas | 70 |
notes for div a | 67 |
person of the son | 67 |
the one true god | 66 |
is true and perfect | 66 |
the same divine nature | 66 |
is said to be | 66 |
to be the same | 65 |
be the formal reason | 65 |
that it is a | 65 |
a trinity of persons | 64 |
of the catholick church | 64 |
there can be but | 64 |
and identity of nature | 64 |
god with the father | 64 |
there are not three | 63 |
on the other side | 62 |
that the three persons | 62 |
the notion of a | 62 |
that the divine nature | 62 |
of god the father | 62 |
of the trinity and | 62 |
the nature of god | 62 |
the authority of the | 62 |
are but one god | 61 |
the name of god | 61 |
of soul and body | 60 |
of the son and | 60 |
the father is the | 59 |
the same in all | 59 |
and of the holy | 59 |
son and holy spirit | 58 |
in the nature of | 58 |
sameness and identity of | 58 |
the divine nature in | 58 |
these three are one | 58 |
the persons of the | 58 |
the thing it self | 57 |
and the word was | 57 |
of the holy trinity | 57 |
and the holy spirit | 56 |
it is impossible to | 56 |
god blessed for ever | 56 |
of the substance of | 56 |
to the nature of | 56 |
we can have no | 55 |
the sense of the | 55 |
the three persons in | 55 |
name of the father | 55 |
the true nature of | 54 |
if it be so | 54 |
there is no other | 54 |
there is a god | 54 |
with respect to the | 53 |
of the christian church | 53 |
it is impossible for | 52 |
according to the terms | 51 |
that can be made | 51 |
the same god with | 51 |
give me leave to | 51 |
to the terms of | 51 |
the power of god | 51 |
generation of the son | 50 |
of the three persons | 50 |
in opposition to the | 50 |
the nature of a | 50 |
as i have already | 50 |
reason to do so | 50 |
the author of the | 50 |
divine persons in the | 50 |
for keying and markup | 49 |
of the work described | 49 |
tcp assigned for keying | 49 |
text and markup reviewed | 49 |
of persons in the | 49 |
providing financial support to | 49 |
online text creation partnership | 49 |
encoded text transcribed from | 49 |
edition of the work | 49 |
books online text creation | 49 |
iv tiff page images | 49 |
institutions providing financial support | 49 |
text can be copied | 49 |
coded from proquest page | 49 |
this phase i text | 49 |
english books online text | 49 |
i text is available | 49 |
all without asking permission | 49 |
this keyboarded and encoded | 49 |
encoded edition of the | 49 |
phase i text is | 49 |
was divided into two | 49 |
support to the early | 49 |
financial support to the | 49 |
terms of creative commons | 49 |
and coded from proquest | 49 |
in the beginning of | 49 |
keyed and coded from | 49 |
persons in the trinity | 49 |
the work described above | 49 |
and therefore chose to | 49 |
the terms of creative | 49 |
and encoded edition of | 49 |
assigned for keying and | 49 |
to the early english | 49 |
the early english books | 49 |
and the same infinite | 49 |
markup reviewed and edited | 49 |
text is available for | 49 |
from proquest page images | 49 |
the text can be | 49 |
owned by the institutions | 49 |
by the institutions providing | 49 |
images scanned from microfilm | 49 |
if there was a | 49 |
the institutions providing financial | 49 |
described above is co | 49 |
and markup reviewed and | 49 |
work described above is | 49 |
keyboarded and encoded edition | 49 |
even for commercial purposes | 49 |
is available for reuse | 49 |
compelling reason to do | 48 |
in of gaps by | 48 |
in mind that in | 48 |
remaining illegibles were encoded | 48 |
included and sometimes a | 48 |
tcp is to encode | 48 |
cambridge bibliography of english | 48 |
produce large quantities of | 48 |
assumptions that can be | 48 |
bibliography of english literature | 48 |
quality of tcp data | 48 |
of a works in | 48 |
data within the usual | 48 |
sometimes a second or | 48 |
that due credit and | 48 |
a limit of instances | 48 |
up to a limit | 48 |
the general aim of | 48 |
characters or elements to | 48 |
to reflect the true | 48 |
tcp files to tei | 48 |
tcp aimed to produce | 48 |
i must tell him | 48 |
creating the tcp texts | 48 |
was based on the | 48 |
in oxford and michigan | 48 |
in one and the | 48 |
were encoded and linked | 48 |
of the tei in | 48 |
texts based on the | 48 |
and therefore of any | 48 |
files to tei p | 48 |
and characters marked as | 48 |
never have been looked | 48 |
divided into two phases | 48 |
usual project restraints of | 48 |
these texts for their | 48 |
into the public domain | 48 |
first editions of a | 48 |
the text creation partnership | 48 |
readable characters will be | 48 |
the print record of | 48 |
tcp is a partnership | 48 |
encoding based on the | 48 |
be marked as illegible | 48 |
the image sets published | 48 |
was proofread for accuracy | 48 |
based on the image | 48 |
or tei g elements | 48 |
ascii text with mnemonic | 48 |
the texts have been | 48 |
keyers to be redone | 48 |
processes should make clear | 48 |
of textual data within | 48 |
a partnership between the | 48 |
of the process of | 48 |
due credit and attribution | 48 |
of each text was | 48 |
out by editorial teams | 48 |
general aim of eebo | 48 |
title published between and | 48 |
encoded texts based on | 48 |
the filling in of | 48 |
and encoded texts based | 48 |
there was a compelling | 48 |
creation partnership web site | 48 |
of any assumptions that | 48 |
errors will remain and | 48 |
and linked to page | 48 |
possible up to a | 48 |
given to their original | 48 |
not meet qa standards | 48 |
a second or later | 48 |
and markup guidelines are | 48 |
placeholder characters or elements | 48 |
structural encoding based on | 48 |
quantities of textual data | 48 |
of every monographic english | 48 |
images in accordance with | 48 |
image sets were sent | 48 |
limit of instances per | 48 |
the public domain as | 48 |
those which did not | 48 |
opposed to critical editions | 48 |
as illegible were corrected | 48 |
sets published by proquest | 48 |
texts for their own | 48 |
in all likelihood such | 48 |
michigan and oxford and | 48 |
request that due credit | 48 |
works in other languages | 48 |
copies of the texts | 48 |
to range over a | 48 |
elements of known extent | 48 |
with changes to facilitate | 48 |
should be aware of | 48 |
sets were sent to | 48 |
project was divided into | 48 |
tcp project was divided | 48 |
the encoding was enhanced | 48 |
where possible up to | 48 |
and oxford and the | 48 |
of works in other | 48 |
for transcription and basic | 48 |
number of works in | 48 |
begotten of the father | 48 |
simplify the filling in | 48 |
returned to the keyers | 48 |
create accurately transcribed and | 48 |
text strings within braces | 48 |
mind that in all | 48 |
to create accurately transcribed | 48 |
of the texts have | 48 |
keying and markup guidelines | 48 |
proofread for accuracy and | 48 |
processed by university of | 48 |
illegibles were encoded as | 48 |
the publisher proquest to | 48 |
attribution is given to | 48 |
carried out by editorial | 48 |
texts created during phase | 48 |
which did not meet | 48 |
known extent have been | 48 |
some readable characters will | 48 |
of tcp data is | 48 |
gaps by user contributors | 48 |
texts were encoded and | 48 |
into placeholder characters or | 48 |
of gaps by user | 48 |
transcribed and encoded texts | 48 |
usually the first edition | 48 |
and use these texts | 48 |
can now take and | 48 |
available at the text | 48 |
of the project have | 48 |
will be marked as | 48 |
corrected where possible up | 48 |
extent have been transformed | 48 |
such instances will never | 48 |
characters marked as illegible | 48 |
is to encode one | 48 |
the text encoding initiative | 48 |
and or corrected and | 48 |
over a wide variety | 48 |
record of the period | 48 |
been issued variously as | 48 |
were sent to external | 48 |
accuracy and those which | 48 |
a wide variety of | 48 |
created during phase of | 48 |
be made about the | 48 |
likelihood such instances will | 48 |
transcription and basic encoding | 48 |
to external keying companies | 48 |
nature of the print | 48 |
and sometimes a second | 48 |
qa standards were returned | 48 |
the process of creating | 48 |
issued variously as sgml | 48 |
of michigan and oxford | 48 |
by proquest via their | 48 |
anyone can now take | 48 |
a number of works | 48 |
within the usual project | 48 |
will never have been | 48 |
proquest to create accurately | 48 |
selection was intended to | 48 |
take and use these | 48 |
unicode or tei g | 48 |
text was proofread for | 48 |
changes to facilitate morpho | 48 |
enhanced and or corrected | 48 |
aimed to produce large | 48 |
keying companies for transcription | 48 |
elements to simplify the | 48 |
later edition of a | 48 |
at the text creation | 48 |
users should bear in | 48 |
or text strings within | 48 |
reflect the true nature | 48 |
by editorial teams in | 48 |
language title published between | 48 |
published between and available | 48 |
and available in eebo | 48 |
with mnemonic sdata character | 48 |
encoded as gap s | 48 |
project have been released | 48 |
was then carried out | 48 |
chosen if there was | 48 |
via their early english | 48 |
in english were prioritized | 48 |
accordance with level of | 48 |
sent to external keying | 48 |
of a work was | 48 |
assurance was then carried | 48 |
page images in accordance | 48 |
chose to create diplomatic | 48 |
print record of the | 48 |
large quantities of textual | 48 |
gap elements of known | 48 |
to tei p using | 48 |
some errors will remain | 48 |
was enhanced and or | 48 |
universities of michigan and | 48 |
editorial teams in oxford | 48 |
are available at the | 48 |
and those which did | 48 |
phase of the project | 48 |
mnemonic sdata character entities | 48 |
are eligible for inclusion | 48 |
was chosen if there | 48 |
should bear in mind | 48 |
by converting tcp files | 48 |
text creation partnership web | 48 |
p using tcp tei | 48 |
the new cambridge bibliography | 48 |
texts have been issued | 48 |
that in all likelihood | 48 |
was a compelling reason | 48 |
were returned to the | 48 |
made about the data | 48 |
companies for transcription and | 48 |
image sets published by | 48 |
notably latin and welsh | 48 |
partnership between the universities | 48 |
while the overall quality | 48 |
their works are eligible | 48 |
proquest via their early | 48 |
process of creating the | 48 |
publisher proquest to create | 48 |
project restraints of time | 48 |
wide variety of subject | 48 |
based on the new | 48 |
text selection was based | 48 |
standards were returned to | 48 |
to simplify the filling | 48 |
edition of a work | 48 |
the universities of michigan | 48 |
oxford and the publisher | 48 |
then carried out by | 48 |
selection was based on | 48 |
textual data within the | 48 |
tei p using tcp | 48 |
users should be aware | 48 |
been looked at by | 48 |
to produce large quantities | 48 |
been released into the | 48 |
therefore of any assumptions | 48 |
between and available in | 48 |
a compelling reason to | 48 |
variety of subject areas | 48 |
now take and use | 48 |
and the publisher proquest | 48 |
text with mnemonic sdata | 48 |
the project have been | 48 |
meet qa standards were | 48 |
unicode or text strings | 48 |
did not meet qa | 48 |
between the universities of | 48 |
any assumptions that can | 48 |
at by a tcp | 48 |
a work was chosen | 48 |
works in english were | 48 |
and some readable characters | 48 |
or for an anonymous | 48 |
second or later edition | 48 |
tei in libraries guidelines | 48 |
true nature of the | 48 |
with level of the | 48 |
created by converting tcp | 48 |
teams in oxford and | 48 |
restraints of time and | 48 |
guidelines are available at | 48 |
for their own purposes | 48 |
the usual project restraints | 48 |
each text was proofread | 48 |
quality assurance was then | 48 |
can be made about | 48 |
any remaining illegibles were | 48 |
intended to range over | 48 |
in the divine persons | 48 |
or later edition of | 48 |
whichever is the greater | 48 |
mainly structural encoding based | 48 |
illegible were corrected where | 48 |
overall quality of tcp | 48 |
their early english books | 48 |
public domain as of | 48 |
encoding was enhanced and | 48 |
released into the public | 48 |
these processes should make | 48 |
tcp data is very | 48 |
filling in of gaps | 48 |
there are a number | 48 |
in accordance with level | 48 |
instances will never have | 48 |
new cambridge bibliography of | 48 |
are a number of | 48 |
or elements to simplify | 48 |
for accuracy and those | 48 |
as opposed to critical | 48 |
to their original source | 48 |
of creating the tcp | 48 |
then their works are | 48 |
marked as illegible were | 48 |
to a limit of | 48 |
domain as of january | 48 |
on the image sets | 48 |
looked at by a | 48 |
to page images in | 48 |
work was chosen if | 48 |
the overall quality of | 48 |
characters will be marked | 48 |
during phase of the | 48 |
have been transformed into | 48 |
from father and son | 48 |
credit and attribution is | 48 |
understanding these processes should | 48 |
been transformed into placeholder | 48 |
of instances per text | 48 |
of time and funding | 48 |
respectfully request that due | 48 |
published by proquest via | 48 |
and attribution is given | 48 |
but we respectfully request | 48 |
were encoded as gap | 48 |
should make clear that | 48 |
were corrected where possible | 48 |
we respectfully request that | 48 |
works are eligible for | 48 |
encoded and linked to | 48 |
the keyers to be | 48 |
of the print record | 48 |
or corrected and characters | 48 |
have been released into | 48 |
is given to their | 48 |
is a partnership between | 48 |
all likelihood such instances | 48 |
by a tcp editor | 48 |
to the keyers to | 48 |
markup guidelines are available | 48 |
of known extent have | 48 |
converting tcp files to | 48 |
transformed into placeholder characters | 48 |
will remain and some | 48 |
linked to page images | 48 |
corrected and characters marked | 48 |
remain and some readable | 48 |
the tei in libraries | 48 |
for an anonymous work | 48 |
was intended to range | 48 |
to encode one copy | 48 |
editions of a works | 48 |
have been issued variously | 48 |
therefore chose to create | 48 |
on the new cambridge | 48 |
range over a wide | 48 |
have been looked at | 48 |
a works in english | 48 |
the texts were encoded | 48 |
accurately transcribed and encoded | 48 |
level of the tei | 48 |
be aware of the | 48 |
based on the text | 48 |
although there are a | 48 |
data is very good | 48 |
aware of the process | 48 |
on the text encoding | 48 |
external keying companies for | 48 |
use these texts for | 48 |
by university of nebraska | 48 |
bear in mind that | 48 |
to create diplomatic transcriptions | 48 |
to the doctrine of | 47 |
the onely true god | 47 |
are not three distinct | 47 |
and of the son | 47 |
there are three persons | 47 |
that there can be | 47 |
in the blessed trinity | 47 |
the son to be | 47 |
in the way of | 47 |
of the truth of | 47 |
my way of certainty | 47 |
not so much as | 47 |
father of our lord | 46 |
this is the true | 46 |
in order of nature | 46 |
of one and the | 46 |
to be three distinct | 46 |
is so far from | 46 |
the three persons are | 46 |
the father is not | 46 |
that the three divine | 46 |
persons of the blessed | 46 |
i do not see | 46 |
the resurrection of the | 46 |
three persons of the | 45 |
in the person of | 45 |
r ocm this keyboarded | 45 |
reproduction of original in | 45 |
estc r ocm this | 45 |
to which i answer | 45 |
it is to be | 45 |
all things were made | 45 |
ocm this keyboarded and | 45 |
that there should be | 45 |
and the same in | 44 |
in the three persons | 44 |
of the word person | 44 |
the mystery of the | 44 |
and therefore it is | 44 |
the form of baptism | 44 |
the beginning of the | 44 |
no more than a | 44 |
the only begotten son | 44 |
infinite minds or spirits | 43 |
the divinity of the | 43 |
the vnity of the | 43 |
the three persons of | 43 |
every one of the | 43 |
there are three gods | 43 |
can be no more | 43 |
the will of god | 43 |
with reference to the | 43 |
the same common nature | 43 |
the doctrin of the | 43 |
the trinity and incarnation | 43 |
i crave leave to | 43 |
that he is a | 43 |
it is not the | 43 |
our lord jesus christ | 42 |
to the holy ghost | 42 |
of the same substance | 42 |
the same individual nature | 42 |
there is no such | 42 |
from the father and | 42 |
of the trinity is | 42 |
they are not three | 42 |
in the notion of | 42 |
a trinity in the | 42 |
in respect of the | 42 |
out of the body | 42 |
our lord iesus christ | 42 |
the son of the | 42 |
as it is in | 42 |
three divine persons in | 42 |
notion of a person | 41 |
all the three persons | 41 |
the word was with | 41 |
so far from being | 41 |
that there may be | 41 |
of the father and | 41 |
mystery of the trinity | 41 |
in his own person | 41 |
notion of a trinity | 41 |
word was with god | 41 |
the rest of the | 41 |
unity of the same | 41 |
the unity of a | 41 |
trinity in the godhead | 40 |
a clear and distinct | 40 |
the foundation of the | 40 |
more gods than one | 40 |
the son is not | 40 |
the distinction of persons | 40 |
that they are not | 40 |
a vindication of the | 40 |
each of whom is | 40 |
the person of christ | 40 |
in the new testament | 40 |
the son and the | 40 |
are not three gods | 40 |
i take to be | 40 |
faith of the trinity | 40 |
the son is god | 39 |
of certainty by reason | 39 |
the glory of the | 39 |
in a state of | 39 |
the essence of god | 39 |
word was made flesh | 39 |
the ever blessed trinity | 39 |
singularity of the divine | 39 |
the glory of god | 38 |
each of the divine | 38 |
persons in the unity | 38 |
is one and the | 38 |
of nature in the | 38 |
divine persons to be | 38 |
was in the beginning | 38 |
in the beginning was | 38 |
in the doctrine of | 38 |
the lord thy god | 38 |
in answer to which | 38 |
three persons and one | 38 |
may be said to | 38 |
the one supreme god | 37 |
the power of the | 37 |
be the son of | 37 |
father and son to | 37 |
of the three divine | 37 |
in the old testament | 37 |
i and my father | 37 |
divine nature in the | 37 |
of the same body | 37 |
father and son are | 37 |
of the holy spirit | 37 |
reason of personality in | 37 |
there is nothing in | 37 |
the same nature with | 37 |
that one and the | 37 |
of the nature of | 37 |
of the athanasian creed | 37 |
be but one god | 36 |
to be found in | 36 |
that there is nothing | 36 |
that it is impossible | 36 |
is nothing else but | 36 |
son and spirit are | 36 |
the way of ideas | 36 |
that the son and | 36 |
the word was god | 36 |
use of the word | 36 |
i do not think | 36 |
from the original text | 36 |
the body of christ | 36 |
baptized in the name | 35 |
original text notes for | 35 |
to be the son | 35 |
the same with the | 35 |
of our lord jesus | 35 |
to the notion of | 35 |
the soul and body | 35 |
are said to be | 35 |
the original text notes | 35 |
what i have said | 35 |
these three divine persons | 35 |
that the father and | 35 |
to be a person | 35 |
text notes for div | 35 |
of the new testament | 35 |
if there be any | 35 |
that i do not | 35 |
are one and the | 35 |
nature of the thing | 35 |
there is one god | 35 |
that it is the | 35 |
for the same reason | 35 |
were made by him | 34 |
of father and son | 34 |
of the father is | 34 |
that the holy ghost | 34 |
in the midst of | 34 |
between father and son | 34 |
after the manner of | 34 |
the church of rome | 34 |
doctrine of the holy | 34 |
signification of the word | 34 |
by the holy ghost | 34 |
the singularity of the | 34 |
notion of one god | 34 |
same god with the | 34 |
is the only true | 34 |
and not to be | 34 |
of our lord iesus | 34 |
clear and distinct idea | 34 |
and the same thing | 34 |
nature of the father | 34 |
the union of the | 34 |
things were made by | 34 |
of the catholick faith | 34 |
the son of man | 34 |
and yet but one | 33 |
the personality of the | 33 |
for as much as | 33 |
the communion of the | 33 |
the son and h | 33 |
the holy and ever | 33 |
eternal son of god | 33 |
ought not to be | 33 |
the substance of god | 33 |
the father of our | 33 |
his only begotten son | 33 |
vindication of the doctrine | 33 |
the idea of god | 33 |
of the son is | 33 |
consists in the perception | 33 |
there must be a | 33 |
doctrin of the trinity | 33 |
before the world was | 33 |
only begotten son of | 33 |
the beginning was the | 33 |
they are but one | 33 |
lord god of israel | 32 |
to the son and | 32 |
the nature of things | 32 |
to each of them | 32 |
with the father and | 32 |
the article of the | 32 |
that there is an | 32 |
and therefore we must | 32 |
divine persons are three | 32 |
but this is not | 32 |
the eternal son of | 32 |
and that it is | 32 |
nothing else but the | 32 |
in the form of | 32 |
that this is the | 32 |
if there be three | 32 |
the lord god of | 32 |
sense of the word | 32 |
are three distinct infinite | 32 |
beginning was the word | 32 |
to be in the | 32 |
three persons in one | 32 |
explication of the trinity | 32 |
begotten son of god | 31 |
between the father and | 31 |
is the same with | 31 |
and the same nature | 31 |
that the soul is | 31 |
that the son was | 31 |
if it be not | 31 |
in the same sense | 31 |
and my father are | 31 |
the knowledge of the | 31 |
said to be the | 31 |
persons of the trinity | 31 |
of the christian religion | 31 |
distinct infinite minds or | 31 |
divine nature and essence | 31 |
the word was made | 31 |
substance with the father | 31 |
is essential to the | 31 |
that the doctrine of | 31 |
that he is not | 31 |
to be the true | 31 |
this is not the | 31 |
so that it is | 31 |
persons to be three | 31 |
my father are one | 31 |
the son is the | 31 |
to be but one | 30 |
the end of the | 30 |
and if it be | 30 |
unity of nature in | 30 |
the idea of a | 30 |
the being of god | 30 |
one of the three | 30 |
far as i can | 30 |
for there is no | 30 |
the essential properties of | 30 |
that there is any | 30 |
nor the holy ghost | 30 |
that there is one | 30 |
by the name of | 30 |
in the same manner | 30 |
as he is the | 30 |
the love of god | 30 |
there are three distinct | 30 |
an account of the | 30 |
the divine persons in | 30 |
i know not what | 30 |
on the other hand | 30 |
in point of reason | 30 |
individuals of the same | 30 |
and each of them | 30 |
and there is no | 30 |
i desire to know | 30 |
the truth of the | 30 |
to be of the | 30 |
in such a manner | 30 |
to all three persons | 30 |
that the nature of | 30 |
is no more than | 30 |
conscious to each other | 30 |
the true catholick faith | 30 |
the divine persons are | 30 |
it is not so | 30 |
was the son of | 30 |
concerning the sacred trinity | 29 |
certainty in the perception | 29 |
are not to be | 29 |
that the son of | 29 |
the lord of hosts | 29 |
is not the same | 29 |
on the account of | 29 |
doctrine of the church | 29 |
union of soul and | 29 |
persons and one god | 29 |
is as much as | 29 |
three divine persons to | 29 |
the holy ghost god | 29 |
son and the holy | 29 |
as far as i | 29 |
the spirit of the | 29 |
the distinction of the | 29 |
it is the same | 29 |
there must be three | 29 |
doctrine of the catholick | 29 |
simplicity of the divine | 29 |
common to all three | 29 |
the notion of one | 29 |
person in the godhead | 29 |
it is in the | 29 |
humane nature of christ | 29 |
what is meant by | 29 |
proper and peculiar to | 28 |
in the same individual | 28 |
to have been the | 28 |
part of the person | 28 |
infinite mind or spirit | 28 |
fountain of the deity | 28 |
an answer to the | 28 |
a numerical unity of | 28 |
the son is begotten | 28 |
resurrection of the same | 28 |
the holy spirit is | 28 |
the council of nice | 28 |
the sameness and identity | 28 |
persons are three distinct | 28 |
have the same nature | 28 |
that god is one | 28 |
and distinct idea of | 28 |
the divinity of christ | 28 |
of the holy and | 28 |
in three distinct persons | 28 |
person in the trinity | 28 |
considerations on the explications | 27 |
in the christian church | 27 |
that it cannot be | 27 |
every one of them | 27 |
the explications of the | 27 |
no more than the | 27 |
the true notion of | 27 |
is not the son | 27 |
a part of the | 27 |
that he is the | 27 |
unity and identity of | 27 |
on the explications of | 27 |
to take notice of | 27 |
the notion of substance | 27 |
the history of the | 27 |
and his living image | 27 |
as the father is | 27 |
by sensation or reflection | 27 |
each of them is | 27 |
distinguished from each other | 27 |
to give an account | 27 |
all that is in | 27 |
is of the father | 27 |
is common to all | 27 |
there be but one | 27 |
wisdom of the father | 27 |
of the divine substance | 27 |
a divine person is | 26 |
the use of the | 26 |
him to be a | 26 |
divinity of the son | 26 |
this is a very | 26 |
the wisdom of god | 26 |
a plurality of gods | 26 |
persons in the same | 26 |
i do not understand | 26 |
the father is in | 26 |
the testimony of the | 26 |
in a letter to | 26 |
no such thing as | 26 |
of the godhead in | 26 |
that there is not | 26 |
which is in the | 26 |
the image of god | 26 |
can be said to | 26 |
the creation of the | 26 |
it is not a | 26 |
is no such thing | 26 |
in each of them | 26 |
three persons to be | 26 |
nature in the three | 26 |
state of the question | 26 |
the father to the | 26 |
to all the three | 26 |
common to all the | 26 |
a specifick unity of | 26 |
because he is the | 26 |
for it is not | 26 |
as if they were | 26 |
the reason of the | 26 |
in the holy scriptures | 26 |
a man and his | 25 |
the true sense of | 25 |
is in the father | 25 |
father to the son | 25 |
that the unity of | 25 |
by a mutual consciousness | 25 |
be three distinct infinite | 25 |
of the old testament | 25 |
the godhead of the | 25 |
the spirit of truth | 25 |
the way of certainty | 25 |
the soul is the | 25 |
the nature of man | 25 |
the incarnation of the | 25 |
as hath been proved | 25 |
the catholick faith of | 25 |
as well as of | 25 |
from god the father | 25 |
for the sake of | 25 |
to the divine persons | 25 |
numerical unity of the | 25 |
by the help of | 25 |
that they are three | 25 |
of the same individual | 25 |
in which it is | 25 |
the mind of man | 25 |
but that it is | 25 |
the world was made | 25 |
the trinity to be | 25 |
be more than one | 25 |
can be no other | 25 |
so as to be | 25 |
any such thing as | 25 |
the divine essence is | 25 |
it seems to me | 25 |
a true and proper | 25 |
testimony of the spirit | 25 |
to be one god | 25 |
eternal generation of the | 25 |
the father to be | 25 |
all the perfections of | 25 |
that it was not | 25 |
persons are one god | 25 |
god the holy ghost | 25 |
when we speak of | 25 |
for ever and ever | 25 |
articles of the christian | 25 |
is the spirit of | 25 |
it ought to be | 25 |
there is such a | 25 |
holy ghost is god | 25 |
himself true and perfect | 25 |
the unity of nature | 24 |
author of christianity not | 24 |
are each of them | 24 |
the author of christianity | 24 |
yet there are not | 24 |
the honour of the | 24 |
and the reason of | 24 |
specifick unity of nature | 24 |
is the substance of | 24 |
but on the contrary | 24 |
of christianity not mysterious | 24 |
to the unity of | 24 |
in the same nature | 24 |
but as to the | 24 |
distinct from each other | 24 |
the attributes of god | 24 |
is to be understood | 24 |
consciousness and mutual consciousness | 24 |
i do not know | 24 |
we are not to | 24 |
is the person of | 24 |
so that there is | 24 |
the articles of the | 24 |
is the true god | 24 |
i have already shewn | 24 |
notion of the trinity | 24 |
as if it were | 24 |
the holy ghost to | 24 |
to the holy spirit | 24 |
whom thou hast sent | 24 |
which is common to | 24 |
one with it self | 24 |
a mind or spirit | 24 |
i may so speak | 24 |
the first and the | 24 |
the generation of the | 24 |
as much as the | 24 |
of personality in the | 24 |
and therefore i shall | 24 |
the eternal generation of | 24 |
related to each other | 24 |
if there be but | 24 |
are not able to | 24 |
is not a person | 24 |
that it should be | 24 |
of the living god | 24 |
which is the same | 24 |
doctrine of the fathers | 24 |
that it is so | 24 |
is an infinite mind | 24 |
formal reason of a | 24 |
divine nature is not | 24 |
to the glory of | 24 |
but the divine nature | 24 |
which is the only | 24 |
a distinct infinite mind | 24 |
explications of the doctrine | 24 |
creation of the world | 24 |
it is impossible that | 24 |
is not the father | 24 |
distinguished from one another | 24 |
is the same in | 23 |
vnity of the godhead | 23 |
not three distinct infinite | 23 |
persons in the deity | 23 |
be true and perfect | 23 |
the whole divine nature | 23 |
and in this sense | 23 |
the reason of this | 23 |
the other two persons | 23 |
the father are one | 23 |
as well as one | 23 |
at the last day | 23 |
to be understood of | 23 |
article of the christian | 23 |
that i know of | 23 |
of nature and person | 23 |
who have the same | 23 |
first and the last | 23 |
persons in the blessed | 23 |
have one and the | 23 |
in the three divine | 23 |
that it is no | 23 |
is not capable of | 23 |
son of god is | 23 |
no more but this | 23 |
in the athanasian creed | 23 |
and the father are | 23 |
after the same manner | 23 |
i do not remember | 23 |
person of the trinity | 23 |
in answer to the | 23 |
that god the father | 23 |
father is not the | 23 |
is the son of | 23 |
real distinction of persons | 23 |
holy ghost are one | 23 |
the father alone is | 23 |
to god the father | 23 |
one god with the | 23 |
have a clear and | 23 |
because it is a | 23 |
him to be god | 23 |
the humane nature of | 23 |
thou art my son | 23 |
authority of the church | 22 |
from the nature of | 22 |
by the word of | 22 |
and xml conversion a | 22 |
and therefore there is | 22 |
substance of the son | 22 |
it could not be | 22 |
and the same divine | 22 |
the perfections of the | 22 |
he was in the | 22 |
from the divine nature | 22 |
nature of a spirit | 22 |
as it is to | 22 |
catholick faith of the | 22 |
trinity of persons in | 22 |
in order to the | 22 |
is but one person | 22 |
as he calls it | 22 |
of the thing it | 22 |
they have the same | 22 |
my notion of certainty | 22 |
the nature of it | 22 |
as much as to | 22 |
the children of israel | 22 |
common to them all | 22 |
christ the son of | 22 |
that there are not | 22 |
the truth of this | 22 |
the idea of matter | 22 |
he is called the | 22 |
man and his living | 22 |
first original of all | 22 |
faith of the church | 22 |
of the trinity in | 22 |
an article of faith | 22 |
which your lordship has | 22 |
is but one and | 22 |
substance of his own | 22 |
that it may be | 22 |
and therefore they are | 22 |
there must be some | 22 |
father and the holy | 22 |
vnity of the divine | 22 |
they are the same | 22 |
nature in the divine | 22 |
because it is not | 22 |
for the proof of | 22 |
of which we have | 22 |
the notion of the | 22 |
a state of separation | 22 |
the son the father | 22 |
the enemies of the | 22 |
and the father in | 22 |
of the spirit is | 22 |
the trinity and transubstantiation | 22 |
the very nature of | 22 |
and therefore cannot be | 22 |
to be able to | 22 |
the real distinction of | 22 |
as if he had | 22 |
be but one person | 22 |
and the same substance | 22 |
the love of the | 22 |
came down from heaven | 22 |
one of the persons | 22 |
in clear and distinct | 22 |
of a trinity of | 22 |
the justice of god | 22 |
is the formal reason | 22 |
subsisting by it self | 22 |
of god is not | 22 |
the meaning of the | 21 |
of the same one | 21 |
divine nature and persons | 21 |
i do not say | 21 |
and if there be | 21 |
say there are three | 21 |
my method of certainty | 21 |
in the present case | 21 |
to be enquired into | 21 |
it to be so | 21 |
as i observed before | 21 |
upon the account of | 21 |
seems to me to | 21 |
and it is the | 21 |
soul and body are | 21 |
are three distinct gods | 21 |
the church of god | 21 |
i am in the | 21 |
be of the same | 21 |
the fountain of the | 21 |
in the church of | 21 |
there may be three | 21 |
and that there is | 21 |
the fulness of the | 21 |
be of dangerous consequence | 21 |
all and each of | 21 |
according to his own | 21 |
of three distinct infinite | 21 |
a contradiction to say | 21 |
there is no god | 21 |
and if this be | 21 |
i and the father | 21 |
in heaven and earth | 21 |
no other god but | 21 |
whole and entire in | 21 |
called the son of | 21 |
the divine nature of | 21 |
three infinite intelligent persons | 21 |
to the end of | 21 |
the essence of the | 21 |
to the three persons | 21 |
in his epistle to | 21 |
the face of the | 21 |
of the idea of | 21 |
in the very same | 21 |
it may be said | 21 |
the being of a | 21 |
in the sense of | 21 |
there should be three | 21 |
distinct from the father | 21 |
is the subject of | 21 |
are three distinct substances | 21 |
a letter to the | 21 |
the same one divine | 21 |
as i humbly conceive | 21 |
said to be a | 21 |
we are to believe | 21 |
not in the least | 21 |
holy and ever blessed | 21 |
the reason of it | 21 |
the trinity in unity | 21 |
do not see how | 21 |
be three persons in | 21 |
history of the unitarians | 21 |
is but one divine | 21 |
god the father is | 21 |
of the spirit of | 21 |
and ever blessed trinity | 21 |
that he did not | 21 |
essential to the notion | 21 |
of the fathers and | 21 |
a thing to be | 21 |
and the spirit of | 21 |
a faculty of thinking | 21 |
the name of nature | 21 |
so much as one | 21 |
is one of the | 20 |
the true and proper | 20 |
definition of a person | 20 |
the difference between the | 20 |
no clear and distinct | 20 |
but that there is | 20 |
that the substance of | 20 |
in the same common | 20 |
three persons are one | 20 |
that the word was | 20 |
there may be a | 20 |
if we do not | 20 |
the proposition to be | 20 |
if the father be | 20 |
the state of the | 20 |
the father in the | 20 |
as well as a | 20 |
the true state of | 20 |
distinction of persons in | 20 |
him to be the | 20 |
the second and third | 20 |
is in it self | 20 |
there could be no | 20 |
the son in the | 20 |
when applied to god | 20 |
himself to be a | 20 |
he could not be | 20 |
i doubt not but | 20 |
the first original of | 20 |
how is it possible | 20 |
unity of a spirit | 20 |
the form of a | 20 |
that christ is the | 20 |
be the cause of | 20 |
all the rest of | 20 |
of the same godhead | 20 |
as well as in | 20 |
divinity of the father | 20 |
in the holy ghost | 20 |
that there must be | 20 |
have no reason to | 20 |
it will not be | 20 |
it is a very | 20 |
there is not a | 20 |
is not so much | 20 |
that the divine persons | 20 |
any one of them | 20 |
any one of the | 20 |
in vindication of the | 20 |
that they may be | 20 |
because the divine nature | 20 |
divine nature and substance | 20 |
the same substance with | 20 |
the same infinite mind | 20 |
original of all things | 20 |
is the cause of | 20 |
under the name of | 20 |
we must not say | 20 |
much as to say | 20 |
or sameness of nature | 20 |
for my own part | 20 |
and the same numerical | 20 |
in the time of | 20 |
to the three divine | 20 |
of the trinity to | 20 |
and this is all | 20 |
but that is not | 20 |
second person of the | 20 |
distinction of the divine | 20 |
that the holy spirit | 20 |
is the same thing | 20 |
by reason of the | 20 |
the sense of scripture | 19 |
covantage keyed and coded | 19 |
the light of nature | 19 |
which we have no | 19 |
and that which is | 19 |
aptara keyed and coded | 19 |
yet they are not | 19 |
the immortality of the | 19 |
cannot be said to | 19 |
the man christ jesus | 19 |
the son is of | 19 |
vnity of a spirit | 19 |
or disagreement of the | 19 |
in the most perfect | 19 |
in the ever blessed | 19 |
the knowledge of god | 19 |
be the same with | 19 |
deep things of god | 19 |
christ and his apostles | 19 |
numerical unity of nature | 19 |
of the godhead is | 19 |
it from all other | 19 |
perfection of the divine | 19 |
is a contradiction to | 19 |
the union of soul | 19 |
apex covantage keyed and | 19 |
a great deal more | 19 |
the principles of reason | 19 |
the manner of the | 19 |
that it is an | 19 |
from whence it follows | 19 |
by the power of | 19 |
that the person of | 19 |
one of the most | 19 |
the beginning of his | 19 |
between the divine persons | 19 |
is to be worshipped | 19 |
the explication of this | 19 |
day have i begotten | 19 |
are and must be | 19 |
the foundation of all | 19 |
is the name of | 19 |
of a divine person | 19 |
is not in the | 19 |
may be said of | 19 |
is the meaning of | 19 |
and at the same | 19 |
have i begotten thee | 19 |
the same divine essence | 19 |
them to be three | 19 |
all that can be | 19 |
notion of the unity | 19 |
between nature and person | 19 |
we are not able | 19 |
in the idea of | 19 |
method of certainty by | 19 |
the soul of man | 19 |
nature of the son | 19 |
the charge of tritheism | 19 |
to more than one | 19 |
my way of ideas | 19 |
the mysteries of the | 19 |
and it is a | 19 |
from the unity of | 19 |
a great deal of | 19 |
it is a contradiction | 19 |
unity of the god | 19 |
the form of god | 19 |
but i do not | 19 |
of the union of | 19 |
the person of a | 19 |
glory of god the | 19 |
vitally united to the | 19 |
give an account of | 19 |
which is the true | 19 |
which is but one | 19 |
i shall endeavour to | 19 |
of the divine unity | 19 |
when applied to the | 19 |
proceeds from father and | 19 |
and identity of the | 18 |
the same one divinity | 18 |
the divine and humane | 18 |
same substance with the | 18 |
in the highest sense | 18 |
the deep things of | 18 |
thing to be enquired | 18 |
believe the doctrine of | 18 |
that jesus christ is | 18 |
and god the holy | 18 |
might as well have | 18 |
and in the same | 18 |
that there is such | 18 |
in his book de | 18 |
there was but one | 18 |
but it is not | 18 |
new way of reasoning | 18 |
essence of the father | 18 |
can be the formal | 18 |
notion and idea of | 18 |
his explication of the | 18 |
there is any such | 18 |
as i have shewn | 18 |
mutually conscious to each | 18 |
and in like manner | 18 |
be said of the | 18 |
can no more be | 18 |
disagreement of the ideas | 18 |
the second person of | 18 |
true state of the | 18 |
of god in the | 18 |
one who is god | 18 |
union of the divine | 18 |
nothing to the purpose | 18 |
that this is not | 18 |
the manner of a | 18 |
god is but one | 18 |
born of the virgin | 18 |
son of the living | 18 |
all that the father | 18 |
a letter to a | 18 |
love of the father | 18 |
holy ghost to be | 18 |
and by the same | 18 |
the spirit is the | 18 |
act of the mind | 18 |
and substance of the | 18 |
but what is this | 18 |
is the very same | 18 |
the foundations of the | 18 |
peculiar manner of subsistence | 18 |
the doctrines of the | 18 |
where there is no | 18 |
put an end to | 18 |
in the same divine | 18 |
nothing can be more | 18 |
some of the most | 18 |
article of the trinity | 18 |
trinity of divine persons | 18 |
because it is the | 18 |
in answer to a | 18 |
to be three gods | 18 |
but it may be | 18 |
the persons in the | 18 |
as there is but | 18 |
that father and son | 18 |
is the most perfect | 18 |
and it is not | 18 |
for ought we know | 18 |
son is of the | 18 |
he was the son | 18 |
to be worshipped with | 18 |
perfectly the same in | 18 |
concerning the unity of | 18 |
if i may so | 18 |
procession of the holy | 18 |
my definition of knowledge | 17 |
in answer to this | 17 |
it is evident that | 17 |
in every one of | 17 |
government of the world | 17 |
not to be found | 17 |
if it had been | 17 |
the light of the | 17 |
a spirit consists in | 17 |
that he was the | 17 |
be the same body | 17 |
there be three persons | 17 |
perfections of the divine | 17 |
if this be the | 17 |
out of my book | 17 |
in the beginning with | 17 |
of a different nature | 17 |
the divine nature to | 17 |
mysteries of the christian | 17 |
sense of the words | 17 |
the cause of the | 17 |
he might as well | 17 |
in the vnity of | 17 |
they honour the father | 17 |
that he should be | 17 |
if the soul be | 17 |
persons are but one | 17 |
i do not find | 17 |
the essence of matter | 17 |
that there was a | 17 |
the most high god | 17 |
and wisdom of god | 17 |
in the same respect | 17 |
but if it be | 17 |
person of the holy | 17 |
is the one true | 17 |
differ from one another | 17 |
original in huntington library | 17 |
never be able to | 17 |
must of necessity be | 17 |
by the same reason | 17 |
this day have i | 17 |
the words of the | 17 |
if it were not | 17 |
received doctrine of the | 17 |
in respect of his | 17 |
united to the soul | 17 |
and the son in | 17 |
proposition to be proved | 17 |
is no other god | 17 |
and the unity of | 17 |
and this is that | 17 |
sense of the christian | 17 |
of the true god | 17 |
united to the body | 17 |
is not this a | 17 |
the church of christ | 17 |
god of very god | 17 |
very god of very | 17 |
the truth of it | 17 |
as to the first | 17 |
as to make them | 17 |
by the spirit of | 17 |
as the divine nature | 17 |
of the knowledge of | 17 |
and as to the | 17 |
of original in huntington | 17 |
and the son are | 17 |
ideas in our minds | 17 |
and in another place | 17 |
is the divine essence | 17 |
by one and the | 17 |
there are three that | 17 |
three substances in the | 17 |
to be the only | 17 |
the right hand of | 17 |
all the catholick fathers | 17 |
he is not the | 17 |
is due to the | 17 |
we ought not to | 17 |
the beginning with god | 17 |
the grace of god | 17 |
of the only begotten | 17 |
son of the father | 17 |
are the same god | 17 |
is in the son | 17 |
the divine essence and | 17 |
of the trinity by | 17 |
the god of abraham | 17 |
the same thing in | 17 |
i think it is | 17 |
to the person of | 17 |
for any one to | 17 |
the spirit of a | 17 |
there shall be no | 17 |
this is life eternal | 17 |
the individual unity of | 17 |
divine persons are not | 17 |
as one and the | 17 |
is contrary to the | 17 |
the soul to be | 17 |
immortality of the soul | 17 |
as they honour the | 17 |
of the same sort | 17 |
are three divine persons | 17 |
but one who is | 17 |
a distinct person from | 17 |
the very same thing | 17 |
this doctrine of the | 17 |
the same individual essence | 17 |
the first chapter of | 17 |
and unity in trinity | 17 |
of the ever blessed | 17 |
am in the father | 17 |
are three distinct persons | 17 |
of a spirit consists | 17 |
each of the three | 17 |
there are three divine | 17 |
the glory of his | 17 |
the university of oxford | 17 |
of the trinity as | 17 |
i am the lord | 17 |
personality of the soul | 17 |
this may serve to | 17 |
the writings of the | 17 |
doctrines of the trinity | 17 |
the subsistence of the | 17 |
god is said to | 17 |
and the power of | 17 |
be understood of the | 17 |
communion of the holy | 17 |
that the divine essence | 16 |
that according to the | 16 |
that this is a | 16 |
as well as to | 16 |
the idea of substance | 16 |
persons in one and | 16 |
soul is the person | 16 |
the judgment of the | 16 |
one god the father | 16 |
because there is no | 16 |
that these three are | 16 |
and therefore but one | 16 |
a trinity of names | 16 |
the father in me | 16 |
from the idea of | 16 |
the mysteries of faith | 16 |
what he means by | 16 |
in the th page | 16 |
the lord jesus christ | 16 |
if he had not | 16 |
they are all three | 16 |
a power of thinking | 16 |
be no more than | 16 |
weakens the credibility of | 16 |
in the father and | 16 |
for the divine nature | 16 |
son is not the | 16 |
and in the next | 16 |
each other in themselves | 16 |
the greatest part of | 16 |
the epistle to the | 16 |
image of the father | 16 |
reason of the thing | 16 |
that we may be | 16 |
the perfection of the | 16 |
in the same place | 16 |
was not any thing | 16 |
he will not allow | 16 |
that is in the | 16 |
but one divine person | 16 |
the old and new | 16 |
so that here is | 16 |
there is no reason | 16 |
by himself true and | 16 |
and power of god | 16 |
for the same thing | 16 |
and therefore if the | 16 |
godhead of the father | 16 |
are a great many | 16 |
be of the father | 16 |
and as for the | 16 |
notion of the word | 16 |
and these three are | 16 |
the righteousness of faith | 16 |
and the god of | 16 |
a trinity in vnity | 16 |
am alpha and omega | 16 |
certainty consists in the | 16 |
if there were no | 16 |
eternal generation and procession | 16 |
out of the way | 16 |
to the sense of | 16 |
said to be three | 16 |
the divine nature or | 16 |
of which it is | 16 |
is the same god | 16 |
any man of sense | 16 |
the said three persons | 16 |
to be a distinct | 16 |
him was not any | 16 |
in the plural number | 16 |
person from the father | 16 |
resurrection of the dead | 16 |
without him was not | 16 |
incarnation of the son | 16 |
the one only god | 16 |
from the other two | 16 |
form of a servant | 16 |
of which more presently | 16 |
whom are all things | 16 |
and there can be | 16 |
can by no means | 16 |
the master of the | 16 |
in what sense the | 16 |
resurrection from the dead | 16 |
from all other minds | 16 |
is begotten of the | 16 |
mind and its word | 16 |
same one divine nature | 16 |
such thing as a | 16 |
there is no need | 16 |
or the holy ghost | 16 |
enemies of the christian | 16 |
the first of these | 16 |
the notion of an | 16 |
it to be a | 16 |
of the distinction of | 16 |
is inconsistent with the | 16 |
the sins of the | 16 |
the father is a | 16 |
god the father and | 16 |
perfectly one and the | 16 |
essential unity of the | 16 |
the same specifick nature | 16 |
within the compass of | 16 |
separation from the body | 16 |
be one and the | 16 |
that we have no | 16 |
all three divine persons | 16 |
the general sense of | 16 |
which i do not | 16 |
and there is none | 16 |
words of our saviour | 16 |
properly said to be | 16 |
the existence of the | 16 |
consciousness is not the | 16 |
all things were created | 16 |
is any such thing | 16 |
i am alpha and | 16 |
said to be one | 16 |
it may be so | 16 |
with the unity of | 16 |
that there are no | 16 |
have no clear and | 16 |
of his own nature | 16 |
not any thing made | 16 |
have no idea of | 16 |
one and the self | 16 |
principle of mutual consciousness | 16 |
holy ghost are not | 16 |
and son to the | 15 |
of one substance with | 15 |
have all the same | 15 |
the fulness of time | 15 |
distinction and unity of | 15 |
real and nominal trinitarians | 15 |
in defence of the | 15 |
any thing that is | 15 |
the name of christ | 15 |
distinct minds or spirits | 15 |
let us see what | 15 |
we do not understand | 15 |
he could not have | 15 |
that he is in | 15 |
more than a man | 15 |
by sensation and reflection | 15 |
one person in the | 15 |
there are a great | 15 |
from each other by | 15 |
say that there are | 15 |
for the glory of | 15 |
christ from the dead | 15 |
of a different kind | 15 |
manner of a spirit | 15 |
substance in the world | 15 |
it must be a | 15 |
that the idea of | 15 |
your way of certainty | 15 |
nature with the father | 15 |
we are ready to | 15 |
not being able to | 15 |
it is no wonder | 15 |
to no more than | 15 |
father is the one | 15 |
any thing can be | 15 |
the manner of it | 15 |
the same with it | 15 |
the signification of the | 15 |
i leave it to | 15 |
faith of the catholick | 15 |
as the son of | 15 |
be properly said to | 15 |
letter to a friend | 15 |
if there be no | 15 |
that your lordship has | 15 |
the holy ghost a | 15 |
which can never be | 15 |
your lordship means by | 15 |
both god and man | 15 |
these and the like | 15 |
three persons in god | 15 |
it was in the | 15 |
to each other in | 15 |
that he was not | 15 |
a great part of | 15 |
the human nature of | 15 |
is impossible for the | 15 |
the wisdom of the | 15 |
it is hard to | 15 |
three persons are but | 15 |
essential properties of a | 15 |
this is the account | 15 |
because they are not | 15 |
that the name of | 15 |
far from being a | 15 |
that it is one | 15 |
and yet there are | 15 |
he speaks of the | 15 |
your lordship tells me | 15 |
must be a person | 15 |
three distinct minds or | 15 |
the essential unity of | 15 |
are to be understood | 15 |
and so of the | 15 |
if the son and | 15 |
that of the trinity | 15 |
as the spirit of | 15 |
to be one of | 15 |
it will be necessary | 15 |
that if there be | 15 |
consciousness to be the | 15 |
of heaven and earth | 15 |
these three persons are | 15 |
we do not say | 15 |
the divine persons to | 15 |
formal reason of the | 15 |
of a rational nature | 15 |
cannot be the formal | 15 |
he shall come in | 15 |
i know not how | 15 |
the divine nature as | 15 |
we may be certain | 15 |
all three but one | 15 |
of that which is | 15 |
which is all that | 15 |
the word of the | 15 |
father and son in | 15 |
it would have been | 15 |
come to any certainty | 15 |
is impossible to be | 15 |
and it is impossible | 15 |
nor the son the | 15 |
and without him was | 15 |
and a divine person | 15 |
i desire him to | 15 |
a plurality of persons | 15 |
by which it is | 15 |
not to be a | 15 |
subsist in one another | 15 |
to be true and | 15 |
be nothing else but | 15 |
in the defence of | 15 |
vindication of the trinity | 15 |
that my definition of | 15 |
we find in our | 15 |
that the father hath | 15 |
one of the divine | 15 |
what hath been said | 15 |
there is a difference | 15 |
perfect sameness and identity | 15 |
is it possible for | 15 |
by the catholick church | 15 |
obscure and confused ideas | 15 |
are so far from | 15 |
what he has said | 15 |
that it was the | 15 |
the death of christ | 15 |
perfectly clear and distinct | 15 |
to be three persons | 15 |
essence of a man | 15 |
as appears by the | 15 |
have a mind to | 15 |
what it is to | 15 |
him the form of | 15 |
and therefore is not | 15 |
general principles of reason | 15 |
they are to be | 15 |
pay divine worship to | 15 |
we cannot come to | 15 |
therefore there can be | 15 |
of the same person | 15 |
yet but one god | 15 |
old and new testament | 15 |
an unity of nature | 15 |
god and infinite mind | 15 |
in the stead of | 15 |
and blood of christ | 15 |
if this be not | 15 |
is an end of | 15 |
to make use of | 15 |
the god of israel | 15 |
as it is the | 15 |
of the other two | 15 |
to us in the | 15 |
who is true and | 15 |
i would have him | 15 |
there is an end | 15 |
of the said nature | 15 |
master of the sentences | 15 |
that i may not | 15 |
there is between the | 15 |
shall come to pass | 15 |
he made the world | 15 |
the catholick faith is | 15 |
and that is the | 15 |
which is all one | 15 |
trinity in unity is | 15 |
that we are to | 15 |
thus saith the lord | 15 |
to the knowledge of | 15 |
the force of the | 15 |
subsistences of one and | 14 |
the three persons is | 14 |
is nothing in the | 14 |
doctrine of the incarnation | 14 |
of original in the | 14 |
and it would be | 14 |
what we are to | 14 |
specifick unity of the | 14 |
the word person is | 14 |
our souls and bodies | 14 |
i come to the | 14 |
in the room of | 14 |
it is no more | 14 |
the incarnation of our | 14 |
his own nature and | 14 |
and god the son | 14 |
i am sure it | 14 |
that bear record in | 14 |
divine nature or essence | 14 |
then this may serve | 14 |
at the bible and | 14 |
and therefore the son | 14 |
the meaning of this | 14 |
this is not all | 14 |
is a common nature | 14 |
what your lordship says | 14 |
it is not to | 14 |
in the same one | 14 |
where there is but | 14 |
and the rest of | 14 |
distinct persons in the | 14 |
if it be thus | 14 |
as he is a | 14 |
in the knowledge of | 14 |
of the council of | 14 |
laid the foundation of | 14 |
that you do not | 14 |
as the nature of | 14 |
infinite mind and spirit | 14 |
what you mean by | 14 |
the godhead of christ | 14 |
he ought to have | 14 |
that a divine person | 14 |
in the close of | 14 |
this sameness and identity | 14 |
yet there is but | 14 |
the heaven and the | 14 |
united to each other | 14 |
that there is some | 14 |
because they do not | 14 |
and that he is | 14 |
that he may be | 14 |
pure and simple act | 14 |
the very notion of | 14 |
never so much as | 14 |
of a mind or | 14 |
and that in the | 14 |
of the catholick fathers | 14 |
as i take it | 14 |
nothing else but a | 14 |
the credibility of the | 14 |
and god the sanctifier | 14 |
is proper and peculiar | 14 |
and the same person | 14 |
but that which is | 14 |
a distinction of persons | 14 |
and holy ghost to | 14 |
crave leave to say | 14 |
of the doctrin of | 14 |
are not the same | 14 |
are the same with | 14 |
in the fulness of | 14 |
at the time of | 14 |
god is a spirit | 14 |
the son is a | 14 |
but if there be | 14 |
on the part of | 14 |
substances in the trinity | 14 |
is the object of | 14 |
i think fit to | 14 |
which is to come | 14 |
notion of the divine | 14 |
the souls of men | 14 |
in the use of | 14 |
of a man is | 14 |
made use of by | 14 |
the belief of the | 14 |
must be three gods | 14 |
from the charge of | 14 |
that i have no | 14 |
i have already proved | 14 |
a pure and simple | 14 |
because there is but | 14 |
nothing in the world | 14 |
that we ought to | 14 |
that the notion of | 14 |
the same one individual | 14 |
in the persons of | 14 |
and according to the | 14 |
nature and person in | 14 |
which is not the | 14 |
that they did not | 14 |
and is not this | 14 |
what i have already | 14 |
that mutual consciousness is | 14 |
for there can be | 14 |
i would have this | 14 |
it is essential to | 14 |
is but one single | 14 |
or so much as | 14 |
the doctrine it self | 14 |
no more than that | 14 |
for this is the | 14 |
leave it to the | 14 |
what it is that | 14 |
in my way of | 14 |
one substance with the | 14 |
in the writings of | 14 |
the language of the | 14 |
in the divine essence | 14 |
this mystery of the | 14 |
to say that the | 14 |
to be a man | 14 |
essence and substance of | 14 |
that there was no | 14 |
name of god is | 14 |
which i take to | 14 |
as far as we | 14 |
to judge of the | 14 |
is god and man | 14 |
the heavens and the | 14 |
they are not one | 14 |
no more than this | 14 |
as it is a | 14 |
hath life in himself | 14 |
the like may be | 14 |
be three distinct gods | 14 |
be clear and distinct | 14 |
an act of the | 14 |
the unity and identity | 14 |
heavens and the earth | 14 |
your lordship goes on | 14 |
bear record in heaven | 14 |
be the true god | 14 |
made use of to | 14 |
must be the same | 14 |
and the nature of | 14 |
but you will say | 14 |
out of the fathers | 14 |
without the help of | 14 |
is said to have | 14 |
and the divine persons | 14 |
upon the authority of | 14 |
the mean time i | 14 |
there is not one | 14 |
an act of knowledge | 14 |
they are one god | 14 |
is perfectly the same | 14 |
and distinct ideas of | 14 |
and for that reason | 14 |
the same as to | 14 |
in the next paragraph | 14 |
to the father and | 14 |
i am apt to | 14 |
had a mind to | 14 |
father is in the | 14 |
of the manner of | 14 |
all three persons are | 14 |
the name of a | 14 |
we have no ideas | 14 |
of the most high | 14 |
the holy ghost in | 14 |
only in clear and | 14 |
as i said before | 14 |
which the catholick fathers | 14 |
heaven and the earth | 14 |
be one of the | 14 |
it is impossible they | 14 |
as not to be | 14 |
the substance of his | 14 |
as well as three | 14 |
the vnity of a | 14 |
it is a great | 14 |
the rule of faith | 14 |
by the catholick fathers | 14 |
of the same thing | 14 |
distinct person from the | 14 |
as father and son | 14 |
such an one as | 14 |
article of the resurrection | 14 |
that we can have | 14 |
in the power of | 14 |
we know nothing of | 14 |
are three that bear | 14 |
this is the only | 14 |
should subsist by themselves | 14 |
is the first and | 14 |
human nature of christ | 14 |
were created by him | 14 |
that god is a | 14 |
for the sins of | 14 |
if this be a | 14 |
the trinity and the | 14 |
attributes of god are | 14 |
a trinity of divine | 14 |
a matter of faith | 14 |
to be the formal | 14 |
in a trinity of | 14 |
are of the same | 14 |
son of god was | 14 |
there is the same | 14 |
a contradiction to the | 14 |
which is to be | 14 |
in the last place | 14 |
divinity and incarnation of | 13 |
hence it is that | 13 |
the lord christ is | 13 |
scripture like wise men | 13 |
and yet they are | 13 |
i would fain know | 13 |
account of this matter | 13 |
if the divine nature | 13 |
three persons are three | 13 |
it cannot be denied | 13 |
the proof of the | 13 |
not the same with | 13 |
of the existence of | 13 |
it is but one | 13 |
and yet it is | 13 |
and to the holy | 13 |
divine persons of the | 13 |
not to be understood | 13 |
be the same god | 13 |
and that this is | 13 |
is not the formal | 13 |
that all things were | 13 |
the evidence of sense | 13 |
with the articles of | 13 |
of my second letter | 13 |
peace of the church | 13 |
but one divine essence | 13 |
be found in the | 13 |
the fathers and the | 13 |
for it is a | 13 |
of the said persons | 13 |
the latter end of | 13 |
as well as he | 13 |
that they do not | 13 |
word and wisdom of | 13 |
it would be a | 13 |
the scope of the | 13 |
that a person is | 13 |
we know not how | 13 |
the mystery on the | 13 |
robbery to be equal | 13 |
not the formal reason | 13 |
such a thing as | 13 |
knowledge consists in the | 13 |
between soul and body | 13 |
in all three persons | 13 |
body and blood of | 13 |
the covenant of grace | 13 |
is the father of | 13 |
the heavens are the | 13 |
the most perfect and | 13 |
the unity of essence | 13 |
the distinction and unity | 13 |
of sense and reason | 13 |
the angels of god | 13 |
not so as to | 13 |
and the person of | 13 |
and this is a | 13 |
being the first original | 13 |
and an eternal spirit | 13 |
we have reason to | 13 |
is to be found | 13 |
worship is due to | 13 |
the use of it | 13 |
i hope it will | 13 |
originally in the father | 13 |
world was made by | 13 |
that clear and distinct | 13 |
but he goes on | 13 |
to be essentially one | 13 |
three infinite minds or | 13 |
essence of god is | 13 |
spirit of a man | 13 |
existing by it self | 13 |
god and father of | 13 |
the belief of a | 13 |
of the same mind | 13 |
three distinct persons are | 13 |
the same numerical nature | 13 |
to be god and | 13 |
a person is an | 13 |
for the most part | 13 |
and therefore i do | 13 |
the fathers and schools | 13 |
the essence and substance | 13 |
can have no clear | 13 |
i cannot but observe | 13 |
for it is the | 13 |
one of these two | 13 |
there are three infinite | 13 |
one substance in the | 13 |
and incarnation of our | 13 |
glory of the father | 13 |
god made the world | 13 |
i have already observed | 13 |
to come to a | 13 |
and therefore must be | 13 |
the divinity and incarnation | 13 |
other god but me | 13 |
substance of a rational | 13 |
divine essence and substance | 13 |
he is pleased to | 13 |
the worship of the | 13 |
like may be said | 13 |
himself to be the | 13 |
may serve to discover | 13 |
all that he has | 13 |
with god the father | 13 |
is a contradiction in | 13 |
the sence of the | 13 |
and that in a | 13 |
of the being of | 13 |
and the son is | 13 |
my grounds of certainty | 13 |
the question is not | 13 |
proper son of god | 13 |
by the holy spirit | 13 |
one with the father | 13 |
the blessed trinity are | 13 |
to consist in the | 13 |
the explication of the | 13 |
that the soul in | 13 |
are three persons in | 13 |
that i need not | 13 |
can never be the | 13 |
the works of god | 13 |
the great ends of | 13 |
the three persons to | 13 |
naturall son of god | 13 |
and on the other | 13 |
thing to be considered | 13 |
the government of the | 13 |
upon the same subject | 13 |
in the womb of | 13 |
from the person of | 13 |
united into one person | 13 |
they know not what | 13 |
we are capable of | 13 |
is the holy ghost | 13 |
all the three divine | 13 |
we may come to | 13 |
and to the same | 13 |
is impossible they should | 13 |
because i do not | 13 |
there being but one | 13 |
christ to be the | 13 |
divinity of our saviour | 13 |
so much as a | 13 |
is truly and properly | 13 |
this is all the | 13 |
in the following words | 13 |
from the authority of | 13 |
and i do not | 13 |
more persons than one | 13 |
is and must be | 13 |
of it in the | 13 |
there cannot be three | 13 |
upon the whole matter | 13 |
same nature with the | 13 |
as there is between | 13 |
if your lordship means | 13 |
the unity of one | 13 |
person of the godhead | 13 |
were all things created | 13 |
the nature of substance | 13 |
and the communion of | 13 |
the holy ghost are | 13 |
i come now to | 13 |
for if there be | 13 |
we have no reason | 13 |
is not the one | 13 |
separated from each other | 13 |
as far as the | 13 |
there is nothing but | 13 |
the greek and latin | 13 |
but the spirit of | 13 |
in his own proper | 13 |
that three persons are | 13 |
the new way of | 13 |
how it can be | 13 |
know not how to | 13 |
is necessary to the | 13 |
on the one hand | 13 |
united to his soul | 13 |
at the end of | 13 |
of clear and distinct | 13 |
have no notion of | 13 |
and son to be | 13 |
because it is impossible | 13 |
we have no other | 13 |
in regard of the | 13 |
is the catholick faith | 13 |
or of one substance | 13 |
the image of the | 13 |
to the perfection of | 13 |
we can form no | 13 |
that my way of | 13 |
whether there be any | 13 |
and the heavens are | 13 |
of the same species | 13 |
is a very plain | 13 |
the god of isaac | 13 |
that some of the | 13 |
that is not the | 13 |
but one true god | 13 |
a being absolutely perfect | 13 |
that god is the | 13 |
it would not be | 13 |
could not have been | 13 |
a true and real | 13 |
if it be possible | 13 |
the divine nature it | 13 |
be god and lord | 13 |
to have the same | 13 |
some of the fathers | 13 |
the numerical unity of | 13 |
though they do not | 13 |
discourse in vindication of | 13 |
as they are in | 13 |
the true christian faith | 13 |
declared to be the | 13 |
substances in the godhead | 13 |
there are in the | 13 |
of a man and | 13 |
the consideration of the | 13 |
is the unity of | 13 |
and distinguishes it from | 13 |
the way of reason | 13 |
to have been a | 13 |
in the likeness of | 13 |
in the holy trinity | 13 |
take notice of the | 13 |
that the word person | 13 |
that each person is | 13 |
really distinct from each | 13 |
there is a great | 13 |
is the one god | 13 |
thing in the world | 12 |
answer to my sermon | 12 |
account of the same | 12 |
what say you to | 12 |
a distinct and separate | 12 |
make use of the | 12 |
they could not be | 12 |
was born of the | 12 |
more than one infinite | 12 |
christ and the holy | 12 |
and the same essence | 12 |
as there is nothing | 12 |
proper signification of the | 12 |
and that it was | 12 |
united to a body | 12 |
different modes of subsistence | 12 |
he would have it | 12 |
go about to prove | 12 |
brief history of the | 12 |
which was the thing | 12 |
that all men should | 12 |
and therefore in the | 12 |
substance of the bread | 12 |
is in the mind | 12 |
that the catholick fathers | 12 |
apology for writing against | 12 |
it shall come to | 12 |
by an eternal generation | 12 |
that are in heaven | 12 |
that we must not | 12 |
are three infinite minds | 12 |
as he tells us | 12 |
to be equal with | 12 |
and the son of | 12 |
as truly and properly | 12 |
that he is god | 12 |
what the catholick fathers | 12 |
well as of the | 12 |
the essences of things | 12 |
and unity of the | 12 |
on the one side | 12 |
the beginning and the | 12 |
between created and uncreated | 12 |
as to the nature | 12 |
wing s estc r | 12 |
the procession of the | 12 |
of one single person | 12 |
created and uncreated persons | 12 |
what they mean by | 12 |
of certainty in the | 12 |
it is not possible | 12 |
that he was a | 12 |
all men should honour | 12 |
holy ghost in the | 12 |
it must be the | 12 |
the second thing to | 12 |
yet it is not | 12 |
what is this to | 12 |
object of our faith | 12 |
to speak of the | 12 |
nor dividing the substance | 12 |
he is the spirit | 12 |
and so i pass | 12 |
he was with god | 12 |
would be glad to | 12 |
second thing to be | 12 |
himself to be god | 12 |
in the same way | 12 |
the only thing that | 12 |
possible for us to | 12 |
of the resurrection of | 12 |
to the spirit of | 12 |
cannot be the same | 12 |
individual substance of a | 12 |
for they are not | 12 |
neither of them is | 12 |
are all of them | 12 |
that a trinity in | 12 |
and wisdom of the | 12 |
that they are the | 12 |
idea of substance is | 12 |