Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A05414	What shall I speake of the studies of the Canon and Ciuill lawes?
A50800	Chirurgical Treatises?
A50800	Was there any possibility of prospering, so long as we continued Traitours to our selves?
A50800	how quickly did our after- games of Loyalty vanish through our own Divisions?
A31455	And here according to Lynwood*, of whom I can not suppose the Founder ignorant; and what say you, if Lynwood made this Statute?
A31455	And if we should allow Genus to be more large than either Consanguinitas, or Sanguis noster, yet is it not restrained by those two?
A31455	And therefore the Jus Agnationis& Cognationis being aequatum by Novella 118, are not both admissable only in the tenth degree, and no farther?
A31455	Besides, what ever these words may signifie, yet may not, Quibus deficientibus, well agree with what has been proposed?
A31455	Now that the tenth degree is the very last, may it not appear with submission?
A31455	Whether there are any such persons now who can claim the Preference as Kinsmen?
A31455	[ 2], 23 p. Printed for J. Whitlock..., London:[ 1695?]
A31455	and who can claim?
A89633	An fiat Pileorum transmigratio?
A89633	An pileum Sir- Shonnuli fit ex Lana Caprina?
A89633	BUt why Princeps, and why Rhetoricus?
A89633	Et e contra?
A89633	Hereditary?
A89633	Physick: And why may not we here have a Key for them also?
A89633	Pileus An tandem fataliter — Exeat omnis?
A89633	Quis enim non ab Ovo mendax?
A89633	Science against Science more persecuting then Ignorance?
A89633	The Scholars Cap is lost, how shal''t be found?
A89633	WHether the Mercuriall Cap be more injured by the Fathers indulgence, the Sons negligence, or the Masters insufficience?
A89633	What shall the Eccho once more tell?
A89633	What shall the Eccho, Eccho tell?
A89633	Whether a lying humour be rather suckt from the dugs of the Nurse; or the paps of custome, or rather, An mendacium be ex traduce?
A89633	Whether a- wel- bred Rhetorician did ever want a Mocenas, or his Cap mendicant?
A89633	Whether every Noble and great Gentlemen ought to be princeps Rhetoricus, a prime good speaker?
A89633	Whether the Parsons Cap hath received more cuts and blows, from the blunt weapons of Bacchus, or the sharp sword of Mars?
A89633	Whether the greatest enemy to the Cap, be not the Cap?
A36875	19.?
A36875	And how prove you the Scripture to be the Word of God?
A36875	And now, — Quis virtutem amplectitur ipsam, Praemia si digna justa negentur ei?
A36875	And shall not our flourishing Kingdom build and endow one College for the maintenance of God''s true Service, and the Honour of the whole State?
A36875	And therefore ought we not of England to advance this College?
A36875	And therefore we may say, What is the Chaff to the word of God?
A36875	And, in a sort, is not this hour of temptation come upon us of England?
A36875	Being a Project to maintain the honour of the State, what good Subject will not contribute to set forward this Project?
A36875	But can Christ be reconciled to Antichrist?
A36875	But if these heads and hands have been so powerfull, what would they have done if united together?
A36875	But was not Christ himself prejudiced for being with Publicans?
A36875	Can God''s Honour stand with the Superstition, Heresie, Idolatry and Blasphemy of Papists, and the Prophaneness of Atheists?
A36875	Eighthly, What abundance have they lately wone in England?
A36875	Fourthly, how will it take with the people, to be told that their forefathers all dyed in the Roman faith?
A36875	Hells hate, Romes horror, of our poyson''d tymes The best of Antidotes, to purge the crymes Shal''t sinke?
A36875	If any ask, what means all this?
A36875	Mark the Apostles Gradation( saith he) What fellowship hath Righteousness with unrighteousness?
A36875	Seventhly, what worldly motives have their Priests and Friers to promote their zeal?
A36875	Sixthly, what a world of wealth and secular helps is at their becks, in France, Flanders, Italy, Spaine, and Germany?
A36875	Thirdly, some of the greatest Prelates( how much self- ingrossing is there in all men?)
A36875	Where hath your Church been visible in all Ages?
A36875	Who will rise up with me against the wicked?
A36875	and lastly, what Concord hath Christ with Belial?
A36875	as Pilate once seemed to have done to Christ, What is Truth?
A36875	how would he have roused up and awakened himself as the Cock, who with his wings clappeth himself, to have been most vigilant over them?
A36875	thus to prepare to give the head of the Dragon his last deadly wound?
A36875	what Communion hath Light with da ● kness?
A36875	what are Traditions, Legends of Saints, to the word of God?
A36875	what is this piece?
A36875	what work would liberty for Jesuits and Friers make in our Congregations in a few months space?
A65356	And Quintilian saith, Quid Aristotelem?
A65356	And have not the Sceptists as much extolled Phyrrho?
A65356	And is it not controverted whether the beginning of the Metaphysicks, and the books of plants, and others belong to Theophrastus, or to Aristotle?
A65356	And would not the same thing have happened to the tenents of Aristotle if they had been true, and indubious?
A65356	As though the matter were pleaded in the Court, where voices are numbred?
A65356	But I pray you, why may there not be more?
A65356	But have they not often celebrated and preferred others before him?
A65356	But how have they attomized the unity and simplicity of that truth?
A65356	But shall we not find that the self- same men have given as great, or greater commendation to others?
A65356	But wherefore can not the one or both be eternal, and nevertheless without motion?
A65356	Can the Schools say, or make it good, that in the space of fifteen hundred years they ever invented any such like thing?
A65356	Can the Science of natural things, whose subject they hold to be corpus naturale mobile, be only speculative, and not practical?
A65356	Deserves this no further investigation?
A65356	Doth he not unworthily tax Plato, that besides matter and Idaea, he had put no efficient cause of generation?
A65356	For how can any boast to be more wise than all the other Philosophers, without being guilty of intollerable pride and arrogance?
A65356	For if they had been extant in the daies of Laertius, would he have concealed them?
A65356	For is not the whole Peripatetick Philosophy rejected of all the antient Fathers?
A65356	Hath the Schools any thing of like firmness, do they demonstrate after Euclides most certain and undeniable way, as Democritus reviviscens doth?
A65356	He propounds the question of the Elements, whether they be, or they be not?
A65356	How could the life of man be happily led, nay how could men in a manner consist without it?
A65356	How darkly and confusedly do they go to work?
A65356	I pray you doth he not wound himself with his own weapon, and strangle himself by his own consequence?
A65356	I pray you why may it not be lawful and possible to conceive a magnitude greater than this world?
A65356	I say the same of these Insnarements: for by what name may I rather call them than Sophisms?
A65356	Idem de istis captionibus dico: quo enim nomine potius Sophismata appellem?
A65356	Is he onely to be accounted — Faelix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas?
A65356	Is it any thing but a just liberty that we ought to maintain, and pursue, thereby to be admitted into the Court of Lady Verity?
A65356	Is the admirable knowledge that Arethmetick afords worthy of nothing but a supine and silent speculation?
A65356	Is this the office of a Physician?
A65356	Is this to be a lover of verity, or indeed to play the immodest Sophister and Caviller?
A65356	It is true, and no way to be denyed, for Cicero sa ● th of him, Quis doctior?
A65356	Let the Merchant, Astronomer, Mariner, Mechanick and all speak whether its greatest glory stand not principally in the practick part?
A65356	Nay are not all the rest also practical?
A65356	Nay is it not common to all, extremely and Hyperbollically to applaud the authors, and builders of their Sect?
A65356	Now is it not manifest that all the Science that men or Schools can teach is but carnal, and tends to exalt& not pull down the imaginations of man?
A65356	Or are the wonderful and stupendious effects that Polygraphy, or Steganography produce to be omitted or neglected?
A65356	Or to what end do the Aristotelians define all the Categories?
A65356	Practical or Speculative?
A65356	Shall I recount his intemperance, voluptuousness, and obscaene manner of living?
A65356	That particle,& non secundùm accidens, is needless; for wherefore was that necessary seeing before he had put per se?
A65356	To all which I might return this, Si respondere noluero, quis Coacturus fit?
A65356	Was not Magick amongst the Persians accepted for a sublime Sapience, and the science of the universal consent of things?
A65356	What can be more plain than this, that it is as a sealed book both to the learned, and unlearned?
A65356	What excellent, admirable and profitable experiments do every one of these afford?
A65356	What helps to Navigation, and almost all other arts, and trades?
A65356	What shall I say of Aristotle?
A65356	What shall I say of it, is it not altogether defective of all solid, and fruit- bearing knowledge?
A65356	What shall I say of that man of men the severe Seneca?
A65356	What shall I say of the Epicuraean Philosophy, brought to light, illustrated and compleated by the labour of that general Scholar Petrus Gassendus?
A65356	Which things being thus, we may marvail to what end they have called and accounted him as a Daemon?
A65356	Who doubteth that Plato is the chief of Philosophers, whether in the acuteness of disputing, or in a certain divine and Homerical faculty of speaking?
A65356	Why is not Iupiter carried with the motion of Saturn?
A65356	Why should I name Iustin Martyr, who so often reprehendeth h ● m?
A65356	and is not this to have something contrary unto it?
A65356	and must these things have the countenance of Law, and confirmation by Charters?
A65356	and the Epicureans, their Master Epicurus?
A65356	and whether they be sempiternal, or not?
A65356	doth it not superfluously abound with vanities and follies?
A65356	for where appears this absurdity?
A65356	have not the Academicks as much applauded Plato, as the Peripateticks have done Aristotle?
A65356	if they serve to no other use than bare and fruitless speculation?
A65356	is only riches got by hook or crook, whether the Patient reeeive benefit or none, live or dy, the sole end of their profession?
A65356	is this book Aristotles or not?
A65356	might not Aristotle and these men err in something?
A65356	must we altogether stand to these mens judgements?
A65356	nay ten thousand times greater, wherein lies the impossibilitie?
A65356	or Hierome, who with so open, and tart a word taxeth versutias ejus, his subtilties?
A65356	or could he have had no suspition of them, who was so diligent to know, and commit to posterity both the lives and books of the Philosophers?
A65356	or hath nature appointed them to be final and infallible determiners, from whose judgement there is no appeal?
A65356	or his impious, doubtful or wicked end?
A65356	or how can it be that the first Sphere should communicate its velocity to all the inferiours, and the second should communicate none at all?
A65356	or that it can be made infinite by something without it self?
A65356	or the Sun with Mars?
A65356	or were they privileged from the common frailty of all men?
A65356	or whether in this manner, rather than in another?
A65356	or whether of this matter, rather than of other?
A65356	or who hath not followed them?
A65356	quis acutior?
A65356	quis in rebus vel inveniendis vel ● udicandis acrior Aristotele unquàm fuit?
A65356	shall the arguments of Picus Mirandula, and others, who have bitterly inveighed against it, fright me from owning the truth?
A65356	was ever any made either wise or happy by it?
A65356	was he not accused for being guilty of immolation to his meretricious mistris?
A65356	what huge light, and advantage doth it bring to Natural Philosophy, and the Mathematicks?
A65356	what is Grammar, Lodgick, Rhetorick, Poesie, Politicks, Ethicks, Oeconomicks, nay Metaphysicks?
A65356	what need is there to memorate Tertullian, Irenaeus, and the more Antient?
A65356	what rare and unheard- of mysteries doth it disclose?
A65356	what weak, frivolous and groundless opinions hath it produced concerning God, Angells, separate substances, and the like?
A65356	whether e ● s rationis, or something else be the subjectum of it?
A65356	who hath been more acute at any time than Aristotle either in the invention, or judging of things?
A65356	who hath been more learned?
A65356	who shall resolve this doubt?
A65356	who spells them a right, or conjoyns them so together that they may perfectly read all that is therein contained?
A65356	who truely reads it and experiences it to be so?
A65356	who would not be inamoured upon thy Seraphick pulchritude?
A65356	who would not court such a Celestial Pallas?
A65356	why should I recite Ambrose, Augustine, Theodoret, and the rest?
A65356	would he think it possible that Aristotle at one and the self- same time, did hold things absolutely contrary one to another?