This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
A60628 | or how can any truly say, that they are gone forward in the Truth, or that they retain a measure of it to wait upon God in their own particulars? |
A41026 | And what Errour, and Heresie, and wickednesse is there that can be named, that is not amongst them? |
A41026 | Are you all there still where Death reigns? |
A41026 | But now mind People, what hath all this produced? |
A41026 | Can none be made free from Sin and Death here, while he is upon Earth? |
A41026 | Have none of you heard the Voyce of the Son of God yet, which they that hear shall live? |
A41026 | Have none of you the Word of God abiding in you, which Word is Quick, and Powerfull, and the enterance of it gives Life? |
A41026 | Is there none come to Life, which is through the Obedience to Christ Jesus, the second Adam, the quickening Spirit, the Lord from Heaven? |
A41026 | Is there none of you come up out of the Grave that can truly say, Oh Death, where is thy Sting? |
A41026 | Is this the Spirit of Christ, or the spirit of Antichrist gone out into the world, which lyes in the wickednesse, where there is many Antichrists? |
A41026 | Now are not those grievous Wolvs& Antichrists that turn against such, and rent such,& c. I say, are not these the grievous Wolves that are entered? |
A41026 | Oh Grave, where is thy Victory? |
A41026 | Or doe you thinke to find another Way to the Father? |
A41026 | Thanks be to God, who hath given me Victory over Death? |
A41026 | Therefore come all ye Teachers and Professors of the World, what say you? |
A41026 | What are you all as Graves which men go over unawares? |
A41026 | an easier Way then Christ? |
A41026 | and the Antichrists that are gone out into the world? |
A41026 | or a broader Way? |
A41026 | what is there not a living man amongst you all who is quickned? |
A42489 | Are not all those flowers and beauties of our soules and Church heliotropia, such as have their life and motion from the sunne? |
A42489 | Doe we love the truth if we are weary of it, tediously and peevishly affected to it, willing to leave it, and withdraw from it? |
A42489 | How many are there, that deny, or despise, spise, or suppresse, or oppose, or contemne, scorne, and deride, and corrupt and belye the Truth? |
A42489 | If wee have not loved truth in peace, were it not just with God to make us want truth in warre? |
A42489 | If( I say) such a truth content us; where will be the chearefull light of the promises, which now wee enjoy? |
A42489 | Is this to love the truth? |
A42489 | Is this to love the truth? |
A42489 | Quid amplius pro se facere aut pati potuit, quam pro te& fecit& passus est Christus? |
A42489 | Shall they as Assasinates, be prodigall of their owne and our bloods, and shall we be sparing of our words, estates or persons? |
A42489 | That question of Pilate to Christ, will here be made: What is Truth? |
A42489 | What can you transmit to posterity more desireable than Truth and Peace? |
A42489 | and is not truth like to faile if our love doth? |
A42489 | where the sound and well grounded peace of our consciences? |
A42489 | where the warmth of our zeale, love and affections to God, from the fiduciary apprehensions of his love to our soules? |
A42489 | where the zealous care of leading here a holy life? |
A42489 | where will be the ravishing joy, hopes and expectation of a better life? |
A42489 | will not all these faile us, if truth doth? |
A77966 | Did Christ cry woe against such things, and against them that upheld them then? |
A77966 | Did the Apostles give warning to beware of such, and to turne away from such then? |
A77966 | Did the spirit of the Lord in his servants declare against these things then, and against them that upheld them then? |
A77966 | Did the true Gospel once judge the fleshly man, and leade to live according to God in the spirit? |
A77966 | Did they that Preached the true Gospel receive it contrary to the will of man? |
A77966 | Did they which Preached it, suffer for it by man? |
A77966 | He was the light of the World, of every man that comes into the World? |
A77966 | O foolish people, which have eyes and see not, which have hearts, and doe not understand: Is the Lord changed from what he was? |
A77966 | Was that the true Christ which said, Except you take up my Crosse dayly you can not be my Disciple? |
A77966 | Was that the true Christ which the saints witnessed, by whose blood they were cleansed from sin, and had power over sin? |
A77966 | Were they false Prophets and deceivers in Isayahs time ▪ which he was sent to cry out against, which sought for their gaine from their quarter? |
A77966 | What would you have called Christ, who had no where to lay his head? |
A77966 | and are not these things, and they that uphold them abomination to him now? |
A77966 | and are not your Priests false Priests and Prophets which act the same things? |
A77966 | and are not your Teachers deceivers of the people now, which are found acting the same things? |
A77966 | and are not your Teachers false Prophets and deceivers now, which act the same thing? |
A77966 | and are not your Teachers false Prophets now which act the same things? |
A77966 | and are not your Teachers false Teachers now, which are walking in the same steps? |
A77966 | and can it now be received by the will of man? |
A77966 | and can they now who Preach it be set up by man, who lives in the same persecuting nature? |
A77966 | and is that his spirit in the Teachers and Professors now, which saith Every man hath not the light of Christ in them? |
A77966 | and is that his spirit in the Teachers and people, that hath its liberty, and live in pride, in lust, and in vanity, and their own vvills? |
A77966 | and must not the same spirit where it is made manifest, declare against these things, and against them that uphold them now? |
A77966 | and must not the same spirit, where it is made manifest, give warning to beware of such, and to turne away from such now? |
A77966 | and must not the spirit of Christ where it is made manifest, cry woe against such things, and against them that uphold them now? |
A77969 | 5. how dare thou call these lame arguments tumbling over? |
A77969 | 9. what saith it, the word is nigh thee in thy mouth and in thy heart, was not that the end of these words to listen within? |
A77969 | And in it, all are children of wrath, what is the light of Christ as God corrupted and sinfull, and is all by it children of wrath? |
A77969 | Reply, Scoulding I deny, but I have reprooved thy lyes in the authority of the Lord, and be not so proudly puft up in boasting: what sayes thou? |
A77969 | Then thou goes on, and sayes The Ranters are not for baptisme, and breaking of bread, and are not the Quakers the same? |
A77969 | What saist thou, art thou not in his steps, and among and with him and them that doe these things? |
A77969 | art thou so desparate as that thou wilt hazard thy blood upon this account? |
A77969 | can a sober man read this, and not be ashamed, to hold forth that the Devil deceives soules by bidding them follow the light of Christ( as God)? |
A77969 | can this mans converts be good, while himself is unconverted? |
A77969 | is he a minister of Christ? |
A77969 | or what cause was there to blush when I wrote them? |
A77969 | the word is in the heart, what saith it there? |
A77969 | what doth the Devil deceive souls by bidding follow the light of Christ as God? |
A77969 | what impudence is in thy heart, so to say? |
A77969 | what marvell that he should so belye me, when as he hath called the very Scripture truth, spoken forth in righteousnesse, bablings? |
A77969 | when thou art put to confusion, then such excuses thou brings; Well, some may see thy folly? |
A77969 | wilt thou slander alwayes in secret without evidence? |
A59238 | But, how shall we know who has True, or Right Principles? |
A59238 | But, where is this Philosophy all this while? |
A59238 | Can it be deny''d, but that such very Learned, Acute and Ingenious Men do verily Judge that they clearly and distinctly see their Doctrine to be True? |
A59238 | How many Instances is the World full of, to prove those Perceptions of ours, tho''judg''d by us most Evident, to be Fallacious? |
A59238 | How many Thousands, even of a fair Pitch of Understanding, have mistaken Lively Fancies, for Evident Knowledge? |
A59238 | I should be glad to know whether, or no, you would go about to convince such a Man by Grounds and Principles? |
A59238 | In order to the Clearing of which, I ask: Was it True before you saw Clearly and Distinctly it was True? |
A59238 | Is our Iudgment, or Manner of Conceiving, such a Certain Ground, or Infallible? |
A59238 | Le Grand confesses, this may happen when the Will is Byass''d, or Men are Unskilful;( and how frequent is that?) |
A59238 | Le Grand very rationally granting, p. 92. there goes more to constitute a Rule of Truth, than to be True? |
A59238 | Must Truth be built on Men''s Iudgments, or their Manner of Conceiving? |
A59238 | Must not the Object be such, ere you can know it to be such? |
A59238 | Must, therefore, all Truth be built on a Mistakable Principle? |
A59238 | Or Clearly and Distinctly Perceptible to be such, before you can Clearly and Distinctly Perceive it to be such? |
A59238 | Or, Did it become True by your seeing it( as you phrase it) Clearly and Distinctly to be True? |
A59238 | Or, Is there, indeed, any such Thing in Nature? |
A59238 | Or, What was the Rule of Truth to that Object that was True, ere you saw it to be such? |
A59238 | Suppose I see a Man making great Holes in the Ground, or throwing aside Rubbish; and that I ask him what he is doing? |
A59238 | The Question is, Which of us has this True Evidence, which you call Clear and Distinct Perception? |
A59238 | What signifie these, I say, to the Truth of the Thing? |
A59238 | What signifies yours, or mine, or any Man''s Iudgment, that he Clearly and Distinctly sees a Truth; or, that he must Assent, or may not Assent to it? |
A59238 | Whence, we ask, What was that which made the Object you perceiv''d- to- be- true, to be True? |
A59238 | Where, then, shall we certainly find this One, or only- True Philosophy? |
A59238 | Whether Mathematicians, and some others, who treat of Philosophy in a Mathematical Method, have not propos''d such before me, and made use of them? |
A59238 | Whether such Propositions are not the most- firmly- Grounded, and the First of all others? |
A59238 | Whether there be not such Propositions; as those I call Identical? |
A59238 | Whether they are not Self- evident, and force the Assent of all Mankind? |
A59238 | Why so? |
A42818 | And shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? |
A42818 | And that in the best and noblest pieces of his Creation? |
A42818 | And then I would ask him, how he came to know what he affirms so boldly? |
A42818 | And what am I concern''d then in his sins, which had never my will or consent, more then in the sins of 〈 ◊ 〉, or Julius Caesar? |
A42818 | And why were we drawn out of our nothings but because it was better for us to be, then not to be? |
A42818 | And yet that others, that have strong motives and allurements to the contrary, should violently break out into all kinds of extravagance and impiety? |
A42818 | But it will be said,( 3) If our souls liv''d in a former state did they act in bodies, or without them? |
A42818 | But shal the righteous perish with the wicked? |
A42818 | But will it be said, why did not the divine goodnesse endue us all with this morall stability? |
A42818 | But( a) Why is it so absurd that the soul should have actuated another kind of body, before it came into this? |
A42818 | Can any one say that our supposition derogates from the Divine concourse or Providence? |
A42818 | Doth it use to make and presently destroy? |
A42818 | For who shall be the common seedsman of succeding Humanity, when all mankind is swept away by the fiery deluge? |
A42818 | For, would the world have been too little to have contain''d those souls, without justling with some others? |
A42818 | For,( 1) If I was then newly created when first in this body; what was Adam to mee, who sinned above 5000 years before I came out of nothing? |
A42818 | Had it not been better for us to have been made in this condition of security, then in a state so dangerous? |
A42818 | How can a Body that is neither capable of sense nor sin, infect a soul, as soon as''t is unied to it, with such vitious debauched dispositions? |
A42818 | How can such a cause produce an effect so disproportionate? |
A42818 | How is it that those that are under continual temptations to vice, are yet kept within the bounds of vertue, and sobriety? |
A42818 | If so, how comes it about that at last they can all so wel consist together? |
A42818 | Is there a word said in his revealed will to the contrary? |
A42818 | Is this an effect of those tender mercies that are over all his works? |
A42818 | Moreover the Question of the Disciples, Was it for this mans sin, or for his Fathers that he was born blind? |
A42818 | Nay, than in the sins of Belzebub or Lucifer? |
A42818 | To frame one thing and give it such or such a nature, and then undo what he had done, and make it an other? |
A42818 | What was it that gave us our being, but the immense goodnesse of our Maker? |
A42818 | Who acquainted him with the Divine Counsells? |
A42818 | and how can their deliverance be effected? |
A42818 | or, hath he by his holy penmen told us that either of the other waies was more suitable to his beneplaciture? |
A42818 | or, would they by violence have taken any of the priviledges of the other intellectual creatures from them? |
A42818 | wil not the sincere& vertuous both in the Earth and Air be secured from this sad fate? |
A53669 | 14. Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire, who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings? |
A53669 | And he said, who told thee that thou wast naked? |
A53669 | And is it not strange, that true and real Sacrifices, should be Types and R presentations of that which was not so? |
A53669 | And shall any dare to deny but it may be so, in things Heavenly, Divine, and Spiritual? |
A53669 | And shall we think otherwise of the Law of God? |
A53669 | And why a new sense should be forged for these words, when they are spoken concerning Christ, who can give a just reason? |
A53669 | But do not these men see that they have hereby given away their Cause which they contend for? |
A53669 | But first, I ask what Reason is it that they intend? |
A53669 | But who was this Word? |
A53669 | But why so I pray? |
A53669 | But, Secondly, Where, or with whom, was this Word in the beginning? |
A53669 | Can any thing be more absonant from Faith and Reason, than this absurd expression? |
A53669 | D ● they say, that by his death he hare testimony unto, and confirmed the truth which he had taught? |
A53669 | Do they say that in what he did, and su ● fered, he set us an Example that we should labour after conformity unto? |
A53669 | Do they say, that he taught the Truth or revealed the whole mind and will of God concerning his Worship and our obedience? |
A53669 | Doth he subsist only in the form or nature of God? |
A53669 | For in their Catechism unto this Question, Is the Lord Jesus Christ, purus Homo, a meer man? |
A53669 | For what is according to this Interpretation the meaning of those words, in the beginning was the Word? |
A53669 | Fourthly, In this gloss what is the meaning of all things? |
A53669 | Hast thou O Son, fallen under the Enemies hand in my stead; am I saved by thy wounds; do I live by thy death? |
A53669 | Hast thou eaten of the Tree whreof I commandeded thee that then shouldst not eat? |
A53669 | He that eateth it, 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 shall bear his iniquities, How? |
A53669 | How can three be one, and one be three? |
A53669 | How then will these pretended Masters of Reason reconcile these things? |
A53669 | How then? |
A53669 | How? |
A53669 | If a City be on fire, whose bucket that brings water to quench it ought to be refused? |
A53669 | If a man should have enquired of some of them of old, whether Melchizedeck were purus Homo, a meer man? |
A53669 | Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? |
A53669 | Morte tuâ vivam? |
A53669 | O the infamous portraicture this Doctrine draws of the Infinite Goodness; is this your retribution, O injurious Satisfactionists? |
A53669 | Or how could the truth of any thing more evidently be represented unto their minds? |
A53669 | Peter said to Ananias, why hath Satan filled thy heart to lye to the Holy Ghost? |
A53669 | Tantane me tenuit vivendi nate voluptas, Vt pro me hostili paterer succedere dextrae Quem genui? |
A53669 | The summ of what they say in general, is, How can these things be? |
A53669 | Then said the Jews unto him, thou art not fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? |
A53669 | VVhat is the meaning of were made? |
A53669 | Well, what is that subject matter? |
A53669 | What Reason do they intend? |
A53669 | What is it I pray? |
A53669 | What is their singular herein, concerning how many things may the same be affirmed? |
A53669 | What now can be required to secure our faith in this matter? |
A53669 | What then are they? |
A53669 | What then is this latent sense that is intended, and is discoverable only by themselves? |
A53669 | Whither shall I go from thy Spirit? |
A53669 | converted into flesh, into a Man, so that he who was God ceased so to be, and was turned or changed into flesh, that is a Man? |
A53669 | for then how shall God judge the world? |
A53669 | hath he a divine nature also? |
A53669 | that is, were mended? |
A53669 | tuane haec genitor per vulnera servor? |
A07210 | 424 Risum teneatis, amici? |
A07210 | And if such be the priuiledges of these men, how great is their danger, that liue and conuerse with them? |
A07210 | And yet say, hee both can and will name the man, what great mastery is in this? |
A07210 | As for example, a God appointed Samuel to goe to Bethleem and anoint one of Iesses sonnes to bee King; and when Samuel obiected, How can I goe? |
A07210 | But how did the Priests know, but that Persons spake with some equiuocall reseruations? |
A07210 | But if it be an Equiuocation, such as they fancy, what then shall the reseruation be? |
A07210 | But suppose the reseruation be not iust and due, but that a man vse this arte, when he ought not to equiuocate? |
A07210 | Doe they thus instruct their Catholique Princes, to dissemble and equiuocate? |
A07210 | For did not Puteanus the Prouinciall of the Iaesuites, name the man that reconciled Beza to their Church? |
A07210 | For when Abimelech challenged him for concealing his wife, and asked, What sawest thou, that thou hast done this thing? |
A07210 | For who can say, but when he telleth vs most palpable vntruthes, yet hee may reserue within himselfe some clause to helpe all? |
A07210 | For, may it not hence be reasonably conceiued, that the progresse and proceeding to the framing of this Art, was on this manner? |
A07210 | For, what though the Heretiques complaine of wrong and iniustice done to them in their good name? |
A07210 | Forsitan hoe de te quaeratur, Tune Sac ● r ● os? |
A07210 | I will not say none such can bee named; for who can say or presume, that hee knoweth the sayings and opinions of all former Ages? |
A07210 | Nomine qui varius, qui vestibus, ore, colore es Vectus trans mare tu? |
A07210 | Non( caput aneum) Num tu mendicans abraso crine Sacerdos? |
A07210 | Non( ritu antipodum; Non( apud inferos) Nonne a te binis grauidata est Fuluia natis? |
A07210 | Non( sine scortis) Sacris Papa caput? |
A07210 | Non(* mare mortuum) Curia Papalis tibi visa est? |
A07210 | Num tu Esse Sacerdotem te credis Apollinis, Orci, Isidos, aut Cereris? |
A07210 | Quid rides? |
A07210 | Quid tum? |
A07210 | Quid? |
A07210 | Quo tendis nnbila supra? |
A07210 | Shall I not as soone be deceiued by the Equiuocator, as by the Lyer? |
A07210 | Si, cui consilii socium te adiunxeris, idem Cum suerit Patriae suffossor, petque- duellis, Is coràm sistatur,& hunc norisne rogeris? |
A07210 | Tu inventus verò meam qui 〈 ◊ 〉 fidem? |
A07210 | Tw ● Roman 〈 ◊ 〉? |
A07210 | Vnde sed ista? |
A07210 | Vt ne vireludam pueri de more Sophistae? |
A07210 | Would not euery Boy kicke such a wrangling foole or knaue shall I call him? |
A07210 | and when he hath done all, make vp all with a secret Reseruation, that I neuer dreamed on? |
A07210 | h Num tu rationibus audes Iniussu certare meo? |
A07210 | in any place or time for this 400. yeeres,& c? |
A07210 | mentiar? |
A07210 | or what great credit might such a circumstance, comming from an Equiuocator, gaine to his cause? |
A07210 | or what reason haue I to thinke, but that he speaketh against his knowledge, and conscience? |
A07210 | out of the Court? |
A51283 | & not to the bodie B? |
A51283 | And can they be Phy ● … ically divided into parts of which they do n''t consist? |
A51283 | And how oddly does it look, that one solitary Individual of a Species should exist for God knows how many ages alone? |
A51283 | And if he will the contrary to be true, namely, That he does not Exist, what becomes of him then? |
A51283 | And if there be lapsed Souls there, how shall they be recovered? |
A51283 | And indeed what can be absolute Soveraignty in an intelligent Being, if this be not? |
A51283 | And what a Paradox is this, that our Understandings, as our Eyes, are made onely for things revealed? |
A51283 | And what could God do more correspondently to his Wisdom and Goodness, dealing with free Agents, such as humane Souls are, than this? |
A51283 | And what difference betwixt Impossibility and Necessity? |
A51283 | And what great matter is it if they be not, provided they be as they are and ought to be, Divine? |
A51283 | And what greater Absoluteness than this? |
A51283 | And who knows but this might be part at least of that Glory which, he says, he had before the world was? |
A51283 | But did you take this for any shew of a proof? |
A51283 | But for Philosophical Opinions and Theories what have they to do with the motion of the Nerves? |
A51283 | But the Patriarch Abraham was of another mind, Shall not the Judge of the whole Earth do right? |
A51283 | But then you will say, What is the door and lock to this terrible place? |
A51283 | But whither am I going? |
A51283 | But who does not at first sight discern the weakness of this Allegation? |
A51283 | Could not the Eternal Logos and the Ministry of Angels sufficiently discharge that Province? |
A51283 | Does Mental and Sensitive Nature act on Brutes and Vegetables and all the Passive Elements? |
A51283 | For how can that be the effect of an equilibrious or sufficient Free Will and Power, that is in a manner perpetual and constant? |
A51283 | For if they can act so fully and beatifically without any body, what need there be any Resurrection of the body at all? |
A51283 | For their Prince is the Prince of the Air, as the Apostle calls him; and where can his subjects be, but where he is? |
A51283 | For what a kind of Wisdom or Justice would that be that tended to no good? |
A51283 | For why may not this Earth be the onely Hospital, Nosocomium or Coemeterium, speaking Platonically, of sinfully lapsed Souls? |
A51283 | For, say they, how could Esau and Jacob be said neither to have done good nor evil, if they pre- existed before they came into this world? |
A51283 | Glanvils Letter to himself, in the second Edition of Saducismus Triumphatus? |
A51283 | Here therefore I demand, Are we not to thank him and praise him for his actions of Wisdom, Justice, and Holiness, though they be necessary? |
A51283 | How does this consist with Gods fresh creating humane Souls pure and innocent, and putting them into Bodies? |
A51283 | How then can the Idea of God chiefly consist in this? |
A51283 | How then should the Soul remember what she did or observ''d many hundreds, nay thousands of years ago? |
A51283 | If all were Eye, where were the Hearing,& c. as the Apostle argues? |
A51283 | If bounded by Wisdom and Justice, why is it bounded by them, but that it is better so to be than otherwise? |
A51283 | Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? |
A51283 | Is it possible there should be such a kind of Geometry, wherein any Problem should be demonstrated by any Principles? |
A51283 | Matter can do nothing but by motion, and what relation hath that to a moral Contagion? |
A51283 | Or what need of such a contraction in the Spirit of Nature or Plastick Soul of the corporeal Universe, that it may be contrived into a Nut- shell? |
A51283 | Was it for this mans sin, or his fathers, that he was born blind? |
A51283 | What a distorted and preposterous account is that found, that God should punish men before they sin, because he foresees they will sin? |
A51283 | What is then mere Will and Power left alone, but a blind Hurricane of Hell? |
A51283 | What reason can be more clear or more convincing, That God can create a Spirit in the proper sense thereof, which includes Indiscerpibility? |
A51283 | What remains then to be his Humiliation, but the condescending to assist and countenance the unclean endeavours of Adulterers and Adulteresses? |
A51283 | What then is that action which proceeds onely from that part from which Goodness is secluded? |
A51283 | When it was just and wise for God to do so or so, and the contrary to do otherwise, had he a freedom to decline the doing so? |
A51283 | Where is then the difference betwixt the just and the wicked, in state, place, and body? |
A51283 | Where should he use his Understanding and Reason, if not in things unrevealed in Scripture; that is, in Philosophical things? |
A51283 | Whither then can this Sol redivivus or the Earth turned wholly into the Materia subtilissima again be carried, but into the Sun it self? |
A51283 | Why should God make the Spirit of a Flea, which was intended for the constituting of such a small Animal, large enough to fill the whole world? |
A51283 | Why therefore may we not lapse as before? |
A51283 | Why? |
A51283 | and if it be an humbling and debasing of him, how is it glorious? |
A51283 | shall Christ undergo another and another death for them? |
A51283 | would not the difference be insensible, and the scandal, if any, the same in both? |
A45520 | 6. that is, Power to render the Antichristian World inexcusable, to make their sins exceeding sinful, their plagues insusserable: At quando Messis? |
A45520 | A pattern( a perfect Patern) is and hath been long wanting upon Earth; where then shall we find it? |
A45520 | And Thirdly, What is that curse? |
A45520 | And first, From what the hearts of Men and Saints shall be turned back? |
A45520 | And first, The indignation of God was kindled against Eliphaz and his two friends: why? |
A45520 | And from what Heaven did they thus fall, but from the Heaven of high power, and authority in that Kingdom? |
A45520 | And how did type Babel, with her secular head, fall from this Heaven of power? |
A45520 | And is doing good the way to vanquish? |
A45520 | And they answered him not a word] why not? |
A45520 | And they had a King: And what King? |
A45520 | And they of the People, and Kindreds, and Tongues, and Nations,& c. And Nations; And what of them? |
A45520 | And we may say( I say not of all) of too many; How shall they be sent to reprove, that know not how to reprove? |
A45520 | And what are those works? |
A45520 | And what is sleep? |
A45520 | And what was the cause of this fourfold Call, like thunder? |
A45520 | And what was the means by which he built this tenfold City? |
A45520 | And what was the power of that Prophesie? |
A45520 | And what was thus declared? |
A45520 | And what''s more vain? |
A45520 | And what''s most like Gold, and most contrary to it? |
A45520 | And what''s repentance? |
A45520 | And when began this grand Apostrophe, or diversion of the Gospel- Church from Faith, and obedience? |
A45520 | And wherein are all the imaginations of their hearts thus only evil continually? |
A45520 | And who was then Bishop of Rome? |
A45520 | And why but one? |
A45520 | And why comes this account of them from the Pen of the Prophetick Evangelist? |
A45520 | And why did not the Devil tempt him to something more, or by something else, than these three lusts? |
A45520 | And why is there such need now of the Balm of Gilead? |
A45520 | And( to omit the literal, which are many) what are Spiritual Sorceries? |
A45520 | Because they spake not the thing that was right of God, nor of his servant Job: And why did they not speak the thing that was right? |
A45520 | Belshazzar was laid in the Ballance and found wanting: How wanting? |
A45520 | But Locusts conceive not themselves greatly concern''d in the discharge of any such duty: Quid hoc ad nos? |
A45520 | But what are they or their Armies to these Locusts? |
A45520 | But where must they find this unfound Rock? |
A45520 | But, Secondly, To what must they be turned? |
A45520 | But, Time shall be no more: And how, no more? |
A45520 | Can not the City live in peace for you, nor the Church in quiet? |
A45520 | Come and see: What shall we see? |
A45520 | Consumed their days in vanity,& c. How in vanity? |
A45520 | Corah''s company cryed out against Moses; And what was the cause of their Cry? |
A45520 | Did the Pagan and heretical parts, only, thus fall? |
A45520 | Eli( a true, but too careless servant of God) was laid in the Ballance and found wanting: And how did Elie''s good Works want weight? |
A45520 | Fifthly, What those Harps of God are? |
A45520 | First, Whether the superfluities of Nabals Feast were more due to his Sheep- shearers than to David? |
A45520 | Hath he not spoken also by us? |
A45520 | He destroyed the then almost decayed Unity of the Church, by Schisme: And how may this plainly appear? |
A45520 | Hear now, ye Rebels( said Moses) must we fetch you water out of this Rock? |
A45520 | How came they so quick- sighted to see the Seal of God in their foreheads? |
A45520 | How did he lead on the Van of that revolted body? |
A45520 | How oft shall my Brother sin against me( said Peter to our blessed Saviour) till seven times? |
A45520 | I counsel thee to buy of me gold,& c.] And must men buy the free gifts of God? |
A45520 | Is this your Christian meckness, and submission? |
A45520 | Israel turned back till about the end of 1260 dayes? |
A45520 | Lastly, I will givepower to my two witnesses( Religious Ministers, and Magistrates) and they shall prophesie: And what is prophesie? |
A45520 | Lastly, What their inestimable benefits and safeties shall be by having their hearts turned back again? |
A45520 | Nor, Fifthly, Of their Thefts And what are they? |
A45520 | Of what City? |
A45520 | Peter, lovest thou me( said Christ)? |
A45520 | Quid obest nescire? |
A45520 | Secondly, The indignation of God was kindled against Eliphaz and his two friends: And why against them? |
A45520 | Secondly, To what they shall be turned? |
A45520 | Secondly, We shall enquire; for what they should be thus redeemed? |
A45520 | Smite him on the month, was the high Priests Cry against Paul; what was the cause of it? |
A45520 | Tell me( saith the Apostle) Do ye not hear the Law? |
A45520 | That is, All the wayes and works of her inhabitants, shall be right in practice, conform to Gospel Rule: And wherein consists this conformity? |
A45520 | The Lord, be is the God] And whence was this great acknowledgment of the truth to Gods glory? |
A45520 | They always erred,& c.] Et quid error mentis? |
A45520 | They can run by him and never mind him: Is any thing, that is right in it self, laid before them? |
A45520 | They can run by it, and take no notice of it: What may I say of such men, of such Saints, but this? |
A45520 | They can run by it, or glide over it, and take no notice of it: Is any thing spoken to them? |
A45520 | They can run by it, or run over it( by a cursory reading) and never understand it: Is any man faln amongst Thieves and wounded like the Wayfaring man? |
A45520 | They can run over it by a rash answer before they hear it: Is any work in writing( requisite to refel errours, to reform manners) offered to them? |
A45520 | They( well content, as the Parisees were with their wonted knowledge) will not know these things: what profit cometh( say they) by knowing of them? |
A45520 | Thirdly, What their exceeding great danger is, if their hearts be not turned back? |
A45520 | This is the greatest Apostacy guilded with Hypocrisie: For, If the light of the eye( saith our Saviour) be darkness, how great is that darkness? |
A45520 | This was the mistake of Aaron and Miriam when they said; Hath the Lord, indeed, spoken by Moses? |
A45520 | Vespasian asked Apallonius, what was Nero''s overthrow? |
A45520 | We shall here further shew, First, From what the hearts of Men and Saints shall be turned back? |
A45520 | We shall now enquire, Fourthly, What is here meant by Mount Sion in the Text? |
A45520 | What Doctrine for foundation, did he first lay? |
A45520 | What Doctrine more perfect than that he taught? |
A45520 | What Reformation of mistakes in Manners? |
A45520 | What a Storm is here of unbridled passion in the mouth of Moses, the meekest man on earth? |
A45520 | What information against Errors in Opinions? |
A45520 | What is Truth?] |
A45520 | What was his practice and profession in that juncture of time from 404 to about 412 and some time after? |
A45520 | What was the way of deceiveableness wherein he went? |
A45520 | Who art thou( saith the Apostle) that judgest another? |
A45520 | Who was this that thus fell from Heaven, and who was thus cut down, but only the Representative of the Kingdom of Babylon? |
A45520 | Why as Witchcraft? |
A45520 | is Epiphanes: And why Epiphanes? |
A45520 | is also the same beast: And why the same? |
A45520 | or good Works weapons to overcome? |
A45520 | or, what are the dangers, if the hearts of Men and Saints are not turned back from those( now more than ever swelling) sins? |
A45520 | shall see their dead bodies; where? |
A45520 | what''s this( say they) to us? |
A45520 | when were they commanded( by any command either express or implicit) to spare or protect true Saints, and to torment the Papists, their persecutors? |
A45520 | where are the first- fruits? |
A45520 | wherein consists our remedy? |
A45520 | who bound them( as these Locusts were) by a Law, that they should not hurt( any green thing) the servants of God? |
A45520 | who''s this Son of Jesse? |
A45520 | why halt they themselves betwixt pluralities of opinions? |
A29667 | Alas, are we not all since Adams lapse buried under the shadow of death, and lost in the region of darknesse? |
A29667 | And as he saith of himselfe, Who was weak and I was not weak? |
A29667 | And doth not this convince them of what I affirme? |
A29667 | And if I were now all gore blood, would I not now goe to the Chirurgians? |
A29667 | And if it doth exist, must it not be this which you call actus secundus? |
A29667 | And if this be the nature of the first, what can the second Being( which is the effect, and so lower) be, but a bare notion? |
A29667 | And is not Truth the same? |
A29667 | And others, whose affections are as it were benummed, and all activity is placed in their braine, understand more of the divine nature? |
A29667 | And then how doth this excellency discover it selfe? |
A29667 | Are not the two Testaments expositors of the two Tables? |
A29667 | Are not these like the untrue Mother, who will kill the childe, because she can not call it her own? |
A29667 | Are not those who propound, and they who entertain such a definition, justly compared to the Constable and the Country- Justice? |
A29667 | Are not we as unable to prescribe the manner as the matter of Gods worship? |
A29667 | Are not wee said to be made after the image of God? |
A29667 | Are there not to the constitution of every Being three notions requisite? |
A29667 | As, Vtrum differentiae possunt esse sub eodem genere cum illo quod differre faciunt? |
A29667 | BUT still it is demanded, why may not the understanding supply the third place? |
A29667 | But so, infinity, power,& c. all attributes are in God his Essence, as well as unity? |
A29667 | But the Soule doth act, when it pronounceth a false position? |
A29667 | But where is the second which entertaineth them? |
A29667 | But where shall wee finde these in the understanding? |
A29667 | But where will you finde This? |
A29667 | Can these men, these Beings be said to know God? |
A29667 | Canst thou number the moneths that they fulfill, or knowest thou the time when they bring forth? |
A29667 | Do they leave us any latitude in any other of the Commandements? |
A29667 | Doth not the people of Israel say, Wee are our owne Lords, who shall controll us? |
A29667 | Est superficies concava corporis ambientis; Where is the truth of this in the highest heaven which incompasseth all the rest? |
A29667 | Every truth is* a myste ● y; what must that be then, which is purposely vailed by the Spirit? |
A29667 | For in these, how many, how eternall are the debates? |
A29667 | For what giving and receiving can here be, besides that which maketh both to become one and the selfe same? |
A29667 | For what( to speake in their language) is experiment, but the daughter of light, gathered by frequent observation? |
A29667 | For, how is it possible, that a man should act falshood, a vanity, nothing? |
A29667 | For, what is Discipline but that Doctrine of the manner of Gods worship? |
A29667 | For, where, or who is He, that can resist the struglings of Divine Truth, forcing its way out from the Wombe of Eternity? |
A29667 | Hath Ramus any whit advanced the cause in his definition? |
A29667 | Have they not virtutes Intellectuales& Morales? |
A29667 | How can it choose then, but to be one and the same, seeing( as I said before) such a Recipient can not entertain any other guest? |
A29667 | How can then one piece of that Being impeach the other, one part of the Soule quarrell with the other? |
A29667 | How doth our great Master perplexe himselfe in the inquiry of causes? |
A29667 | How doth the Spirit befoole these men? |
A29667 | How hath Aristotle defined Place? |
A29667 | How is it said that Action is the perfection of all things? |
A29667 | Hîc rogo, non furor est, ne moriare, mori? |
A29667 | I doe seeme( if I mistake not) to maintaine this position by an evident demonstration, thus; Is there any that denyeth God to be purus actus? |
A29667 | I may affirme the same of time, Tempus est mensura motus; What doe I know of time by this? |
A29667 | I should onely aske this one question, Can the divels beleeve or know God to be all mercy? |
A29667 | I will allow it; but is not the Ceremoniall included under the second precept? |
A29667 | IF wee are thus at a stand, in these very beginnings, what shall wee bee, when wee enquire after Causes? |
A29667 | If Faith and Reason, if knowledge and grace be all but one light, how commeth it to passe, that some who have lesse light, have more faith? |
A29667 | If Time and Place be nothing, if all our Actions are but One: How can there be evill and good? |
A29667 | If it be any other than a work of reason, how can it constitute, or become the forme of a rationall soule and humane understanding? |
A29667 | If it be neither more excellent, nor lower, is it various, hath it lesse or more of action? |
A29667 | If it be such, how differs it from thought, ratiocination or positions in the minde? |
A29667 | If the members composing the Body, have matter and forme, why then not the whole Body? |
A29667 | If the truth come from God, then why is it not immediately, intrinsecally, infused into the soule it selfe? |
A29667 | If then it have no Being, the Soule can not act in it, and so it can not be the act of the Soule; For, how shall the soule or truth act upon nothing? |
A29667 | If with this eye you view that Scripture, you will see it in its glory, Is thine eye evill, because thy brothers good increaseth? |
A29667 | In Metaphysicks, with what curious nets do they intangle their hearers? |
A29667 | Is it not a great question, Vtrum Prudentia sit virtus Moralis? |
A29667 | Is not Reason? |
A29667 | Is not this the Athenian Altar, which groaned under that Superscription,* To the unknowne God? |
A29667 | Lastly, how passeth this light from the understanding to the soule? |
A29667 | Locus and spatium corporis locati, is little better; what have we in this definition, of the intrinsecall nature of place? |
A29667 | May we not say of these, what one saith wittily of the Soule? |
A29667 | Now what is the reason of the rule? |
A29667 | Now, what can this act be in this subject, whereof we discourse, but the reasonable working of the soule in this or that conclusion? |
A29667 | Or secondly; Shall the cause be more ignoble than the effects? |
A29667 | So then, What is the form of this primus actus? |
A29667 | The Spirit saith, How can you love whom you doe not know? |
A29667 | The ignorance of this Point, hath raised that empty Question, Whether the Soule or the Body be contentum? |
A29667 | The questions about Faith and Love, are sufficient to fill the world with perpetuall quarrels; As, whether Faith precedeth Repentance? |
A29667 | Thirdly, Who is it that communicateth this light? |
A29667 | This is that which I aymed at; and why not? |
A29667 | This not being well weighed, hath cast our wits upon strange rocks, hath raised this Question, How doth God see things? |
A29667 | View then This new- borne Beauty; mark its Feature, proportion, lineaments; Tell mee now, was Its Birth an object of pity? |
A29667 | Vnde rerum individuatio exoriatur? |
A29667 | Vtrum Prudentia possit separari à virtute Morali? |
A29667 | Vtrum Summum Bonum sit in Intellectu, an Voluntate? |
A29667 | Vtrum universale sit aliquid reale, ● n notionale tantùm? |
A29667 | Vtrum virtus Moralis sita sit in Appetitu Rationali, an Sensitivo? |
A29667 | We have in an houre, an halfe, a quarter, a minute, a second,( the 60 part of a minute:)& how many subdivisions will a scruple admit of? |
A29667 | Wee should not need to check and raise our selves with Davids out- cryes, why art thou cast downe my soule, why art thou disquieted within me? |
A29667 | What a tedious work doth this very division lay upon us? |
A29667 | What are the Mathematicall sciences, but Vnity turning it selfe into severall formes of Numbers and Figures, yet still remaining entire? |
A29667 | What can those workings added to that, from which they receive themselves? |
A29667 | What difference is there betwixt virtus quâ and a faculty? |
A29667 | What fruit doth it yeeld better than the Silk- worme, which is worne onely for ostentation? |
A29667 | What is True Philosophy but Divinity? |
A29667 | What is it to be infinite? |
A29667 | What is the forme of it? |
A29667 | What is this Discourse, but the Work of an Vnderstanding? |
A29667 | What is this their actus primus? |
A29667 | What is this, I am that I am; but this, I am one? |
A29667 | What is with them the forme of a reasonable soule? |
A29667 | What then? |
A29667 | When have the Sun- beams their vigor and efficacy, beating upon the burning glasse, but when the glasse hath gathered them all into one? |
A29667 | Where is the power of our five senses, which are in their nature so honourable, that nihil cadit in intellectum, quod non prius cadit in sensum? |
A29667 | Where is their vertue, but in communis sensus? |
A29667 | Where or what is it? |
A29667 | Where then is the sinne? |
A29667 | Where, or who is Hee that by a Viperous wrea ● he*, or other assault, can smoother Hercules, though yet but sprawling in his cradle? |
A29667 | Whereas, if we Knew aright, how even and smooth would be the way of action, and how great our contents therin? |
A29667 | Whether Faith be a particular application of Christ to my selfe, or onely a bare spirituall beleefe, that Christ is the Son of God? |
A29667 | Whether faith be a beleeving that I am saved, or depending upon God for salvation? |
A29667 | Whether there be a prescript forme of Church- government? |
A29667 | Which now is said to know more? |
A29667 | Who is it that receiveth from the womb of Eternity that reasonable creature, but the creature received? |
A29667 | Who is there that knoweth truth? |
A29667 | Who will not cleerly lose himselfe in such an inquest? |
A29667 | Why doe wee make Philosophy and Divinity two Sciences? |
A29667 | Why may not I say the same of Time, seeing by all mens confessions they are twins of the same womb? |
A29667 | Why may not I say, that if Time doth not parcell out one act, it can not act upon two, when the duality ariseth onely from Time? |
A29667 | and I may say, How can you do what you know not? |
A29667 | and if in any thing we are honoured with this inscription, it is in the most noble part? |
A29667 | and those again, who are for knowledge, as Angels of light, are not partakers of that which is called Saving faith? |
A29667 | can there then be a soule, till there be reason? |
A29667 | doth not every body say, that in God there is no potentia? |
A29667 | how can I from hence ghesse time to have so considerable a Being, as that it shall make two of that whith otherwise would be but one? |
A29667 | if the Will act that way, which is, or ought to be to the Vnderstanding proprium quarto modo; Is not then the will an Vnderstanding? |
A29667 | is not some act? |
A29667 | more than to entangle empty wits withall? |
A29667 | or canst thou mark when the Hindes doe calve? |
A29667 | or rather of envy? |
A29667 | what is the usefulnesse of this more than Arachne''s web? |
A29667 | who was offended and I did not burne? |
A29667 | why may it not be this Recipient? |
A29667 | why should we then think, that That Commandement which God hath honoured in the second place, should be forgotten? |
A70182 | & not to the bodie B? |
A70182 | * How is it that those that are under continual temptations to vice, are yet kept within the bounds of vertue, and sobriety? |
A70182 | * Matter can do nothing but by motion, and what relation hath that to a moral contagion? |
A70182 | * that any thing may be a suitable means to any end? |
A70182 | And can they be Physically divided into parts of which they do n''t consist? |
A70182 | And how can their deliverance be effected? |
A70182 | And how can we be assured of that, if we know not that Veracity is a perfection? |
A70182 | And how oddly does it look, that one solitary Individual of a Species should exist for God knows how many ages alone? |
A70182 | And if he will the contrary to be true, namely, That he does not Exist, what becomes of him then? |
A70182 | And if there be lapsed Souls there, how shall they be recovered? |
A70182 | And indeed what can be absolute Soveraignty in an intelligent Being, if this be not? |
A70182 | And shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? |
A70182 | And that in the best and noblest pieces of his Creation? |
A70182 | And then I would ask him, how he came to know what he affirms so boldly? |
A70182 | And what a Paradox is this, that our Understandings, as our Eyes, are made onely for things revealed? |
A70182 | And what am I concern''d then in his sins, which had never my will or consent, more than in the sins of Mahom ● t, or Julius Caesar? |
A70182 | And what could God do more correspondently to his Wisdom and Goodness, dealing with free Agents, such as humane Souls are, than this? |
A70182 | And what difference betwixt Impossibility and Necessity? |
A70182 | And what great matter is it if they be not, provided they be as they are and ought to be, Divine? |
A70182 | And what greater Absoluteness than this? |
A70182 | And who knows but this might be part at least of that Glory which, he says, he had before the world was? |
A70182 | And why were we drawn out of our nothings, but because it was better for us to be, than not to be? |
A70182 | And yet that others, that have strong motives and allurements to the contrary, should violently break out into all kinds of extravagance and impiety? |
A70182 | But did you take this for any shew of a proof? |
A70182 | But if all alike live in bodies of air in the next condition,* where is then the difference between the just and the wicked, in state, place and body? |
A70182 | But it will be said,( 3) If our Souls liv''d in a former state, did they act in bodies, or without them? |
A70182 | But shall the righteous perish with the wicked? |
A70182 | But the Patriarch Abraham was of another mind, Shall not the Judge of the whole Earth do right? |
A70182 | But then you will say, What is the door and lock to this terrible place? |
A70182 | But whither am I going? |
A70182 | But who does not at first sight discern the weakness of this Allegation? |
A70182 | But will it be said, why did not the divine Goodness endue us all with this moral ● ability? |
A70182 | But( 2) Why is it so absurd that the Soul should have actuated another kind of body, before it came into this? |
A70182 | Can any one say that our supposition derogates from the Divine concourse or Providence? |
A70182 | Could not the Eternal Logos and the Ministry of Angels sufficiently discharge that Province? |
A70182 | Does Mental and Sensitive Nature act on Brutes and Vegetables and all the Passive Elements? |
A70182 | Doth it use to make and presently destroy? |
A70182 | FOR can it be imagin''d that every Argument can be made a proportioned Medium to prove every Conclusion? |
A70182 | For how can that be the effect of an equilibrious or sufficient Free Will and Power, that is in a manner perpetual and constant? |
A70182 | For if they can act so fully and beatifically without any body, what need there be any Resurrection of the body at all? |
A70182 | For their Prince is the Prince of the Air, as the Apostle calls him; and where can his subjects be, but where he is? |
A70182 | For what a kind of Wisdom or Justice would that be that tended to no good? |
A70182 | For what can infinite Wisdom be, but a steady, and immoveable comprehension of all those natures and relations? |
A70182 | For what should make any mass of Matter one, but that which has a special Oneness of Essence in it self, quite different from that of Matter? |
A70182 | For who shall be the common Seeds- man of succeeding Humanity, when all mankind is swept away by the fiery deluge? |
A70182 | For why may not this Earth be the onely Hospital, Nosocomium or Coemeterium, speaking Platonically, of sinfully lapsed Souls? |
A70182 | For, would the world have been too little to have contain''d those souls, without justling with some others? |
A70182 | Had it not been better for us to have been made in this condition of security, than in a state so dangerous? |
A70182 | Here therefore I demand, Are we not to thank him and praise him for his actions of Wisdom, Justice, and Holiness, though they be necessary? |
A70182 | How can a Body that is neither capable of sense nor sin, infect a soul, as soon as''t is united to it, with such vitious debauched dispositions? |
A70182 | How can such a cause produce an effect so disproportionate? |
A70182 | How does this consist with Gods fresh creating humane Souls pure and innocent, and putting them into Bodies? |
A70182 | How then can the Idea of God chiefly consist in this? |
A70182 | How then should the Soul remember what she did or observ''d many hundreds, nay thousands of years ago? |
A70182 | If I was then newly Created when first in this body; what was Adam to me, who sinned above 5000 years before I came out of nothing? |
A70182 | If all were Eye, where were the Hearing,& c. as the Apostle argues? |
A70182 | If bounded by Wisdom and Justice, why is it bounded by them, but that it is better so to be than otherwise? |
A70182 | If so, how comes it about that at last they can all so well consist together? |
A70182 | Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? |
A70182 | Is it possible there should be such a kind of Geometry, wherein any Problem should be demonstrated by any Principles? |
A70182 | Is not this to ● lurr his goodness, and to strait- lace the divine beneficence? |
A70182 | Is there a word said in his revealed Will to the contrary? |
A70182 | Is this an effect of those tender mercies that are over all his works? |
A70182 | Matter can do nothing but by motion, and what relation hath that to a moral Contagion? |
A70182 | Moreover the Question of the Disciples,* Was it for this mans sin, or for his Fathers that he was born blind? |
A70182 | Nay, than in the sins of Beelzebub or Lucifer? |
A70182 | Or what need of such a contraction in the Spirit of Nature or Plastick Soul of the corporeal Universe, that it may be contrived into a Nut- shell? |
A70182 | Quid jucundius quàm scire quid simus, quid fuerimus, quid erimus, atque cum his etiam Divina illa atque suprema post obitum mundique Vicissitudines? |
A70182 | Therefore before I go further, I would demand, whence comes this meer notional or speculative variety? |
A70182 | To frame one thing and give it such or such a nature, and then undo what he had done, and make it another? |
A70182 | Was it for this mans sin, or his fathers, that he was born blind? |
A70182 | What a distorted and preposterous account is that found, that God should punish men before they sin, because he foresees they will sin? |
A70182 | What is then: mere Will and Power left alone, but a blind Hurricane of Hell? |
A70182 | What reason can be more clear or more convincing, That God can create a Spirit in the proper sense thereof, which includes Indiscerpibility? |
A70182 | What remains then to be his Humiliation, but the condescending to assist and countenance the unclean endeavours of Adulterers and Adulteresses? |
A70182 | What then is that action which proceeds onely from that part from which Goodness is secluded? |
A70182 | What was it that gave us our being, but the immense goodness of our Maker? |
A70182 | When it was just and wise for God to do so or so, and the contrary to do otherwise, had he a freedom to decline the doing so? |
A70182 | Where is then the difference betwixt the just and the wicked, in state, place, and body? |
A70182 | Where should he use his Understanding and Reason, if not in things unrevealed in Scripture; that is, in Philosophical things? |
A70182 | Whither then can this Sol redivivus or the Earth turned wholly into the Materia subtilissima again be carried, but into the Sun it self? |
A70182 | Who acquainted him with the Divine Counsels? |
A70182 | Why should God make the Spirit of a Flea, which was intended for the constituting of such a small Animal, large enough to fill the whole world? |
A70182 | Why therefore may we not lapse as before? |
A70182 | Why? |
A70182 | Will not the sincere and vertuous both in the Earth and Air be secured from this sad fate? |
A70182 | and how shall we know it is so, unless there be an intrinsecal relation betwixt Veracity and Perfection? |
A70182 | and if it be an humbling and debasing of him, how is it glorious? |
A70182 | be said neither to have done good nor evil, if they pre- existed before they came into this world? |
A70182 | or, hath he by his holy pen- men told us that either of the other ways was more sutable to his beneplaciture? |
A70182 | or, would they by violence have taken any of the priviledges of the other intellectual Creatures from them? |
A70182 | shall Christ undergo another and another death for them? |
A70182 | that any Object may be conformable to any Faculty? |
A70182 | the state of silence and insensibility? |
A70182 | would not the difference be insensible, and the scandal, if any, the same in both? |
A97067 | & c. Are they a Piece of the Whole and make up the totum Compositum? |
A97067 | ( Which is all one as if you should ask What is the Essence of an Essence? |
A97067 | ( Yea, why may not the Soule see, when the Eye is put out?) |
A97067 | ( or Vpon what rather?) |
A97067 | Again, If there be Apparet and Apparuit, why not Est and Erit? |
A97067 | And first, Whether Vnity be not All in God? |
A97067 | And if Any Creatures may be possibly distinct from other, Why not These Creatures that now are? |
A97067 | And if so, then how doth it differ f ● om Thought or Ratiocina ● ion? |
A97067 | And if this be Hell, who will be afraid to Sinne? |
A97067 | And if this be Hell; who will be afraid to Sinne? |
A97067 | And is not Truth the same? |
A97067 | And is not a Stone the same?] |
A97067 | And such a Coexistence Aristotle and his followers will not deny; Else how can they speak of Qualitates Remissae? |
A97067 | And why? |
A97067 | And why? |
A97067 | Are these Actions its Integrall Parts, as the Members are of the Body; and severall Waters of One Stream? |
A97067 | Are they so? |
A97067 | At, inquam, quare? |
A97067 | At, inquie ●, quidni? |
A97067 | Because every thing is its own Recipient? |
A97067 | Between Davids One Act of Adultery, and the lascivious persons Constant Practise? |
A97067 | But I ask, Whether he think this Attribute Love( and so of the rest) to be an Adequate expression of that whole Essence? |
A97067 | But I demand withall, Whether Action be the sole End of the Soule? |
A97067 | But how doth this prove its Essence to be Vnity? |
A97067 | But if I ask, what it is To be Spirituall? |
A97067 | But if difference of Time and Place be only imaginary; then why do we deny to the Papists, that Christs Body is corporeally present in the Sacrament? |
A97067 | But is it soe? |
A97067 | But is there not t ● e same Reason of Actions that is of Time? |
A97067 | But is this all he seeks to prove? |
A97067 | But what Evill do they mean? |
A97067 | But what is there in all this to perswade us, that Unity is their Essence? |
A97067 | But why so? |
A97067 | But why? |
A97067 | But will he say, So is it in our case? |
A97067 | But will they say that Morall Evill is so too? |
A97067 | But you aske, Why then did not God immediately and intrinsecally communicate this to the Soule it selfe, rather then as a Faculty, or by a Faculty? |
A97067 | But, saith he; What is this their Actus primus? |
A97067 | Can we not see whether he be there or not? |
A97067 | Chapter, Whether the Soule( without an intervenient Faculty) may not be the Recipient of Truth? |
A97067 | Cujus in examine pro lemmate habeatur; Formalem rationem propositionis constare in compositione praedicati cum subjecto? |
A97067 | Dices, quidni quantitas possit esse sine figurâ? |
A97067 | Doth a Stone cease to be Heavy, when it ceaseth to Fall downwards? |
A97067 | Else, where is the fault in this Syllogisme? |
A97067 | Evill in Metaphysicks ▪ or Evill in Ethicks? |
A97067 | Falshood, saith he, is a Vanity, a Lye, a Nothing And why so? |
A97067 | For I demand, What Principle is there implanted in nature to enform me, Whether there ever were such a City as Troy? |
A97067 | For answer, I will but demand in generall, which his Lordship judgeth to be most E ● cellent, the End, or the Mean ●? |
A97067 | For are there not many Individualls under the same Species, whereof One is not the Other? |
A97067 | For granting all things to be One, Yet how shall I know, whether there be an Vnicorn ●, a Phoenix a Mermaid, or Ebur F ● ● ● il ●? |
A97067 | For if he were there, then he Is there: since Then and Now are all one: And if he Be there, why do not I see him there? |
A97067 | For if we knew, that All things are one, what need we feare either difficulty or danger? |
A97067 | For its nature being Privative, and no Reall Being, how can the Soule or Truth work upon Nothing? |
A97067 | For that is his Lordships next demand; Who is it that communicateth this Light? |
A97067 | For what is the nature of Morall Good, or Evill? |
A97067 | For, Is not Water its own Contentum: Is not the Vessell also its own Contentum? |
A97067 | God commanded Moses to go down into Egipt,& c. and Aaron to offer Sacrifice: Doe I Sinne therefore when I doe not- obey this command made to them? |
A97067 | Hath God( like Isaack) but One Blessing? |
A97067 | How Christs body can be at the Same Time in Severall Places? |
A97067 | How can we be said to remember? |
A97067 | How? |
A97067 | Humanitas you may say is Forma Hominis; but will you ask again, What is that which is forma Humanitatis? |
A97067 | I ask therefore first, whether Fire( supposing it to be an Element) be not the true Recipient of Heat? |
A97067 | I ask therefore, whether morall Goodnesse, or Honesty, ● e the Essence, the Entity of a Stone? |
A97067 | I ask, if the Iteration be somwhat more then the first Commission? |
A97067 | I desire, first, to know Whence the great Variety in the Creature doth proceed, if all Being be absolutely Homogeneall? |
A97067 | I grant it; But what then? |
A97067 | I reply, Because, in your Lordships name, invited: If why so late? |
A97067 | I ● so, how can a Learned Schollar be said to Know more then an Ignorant Peasant? |
A97067 | If I ask What the Soule is? |
A97067 | If I be demanded therefore of what I doe, Why at all? |
A97067 | If Iron desire Union,( or conjunction rather) with the Loadstone, doth this prove their Specificall Essence to be One? |
A97067 | If Mans Essence be the higher degree, Why hath not Man the Loadstones Magnetick faculty? |
A97067 | If Simile be Reall, why not Dissimile? |
A97067 | If Succession and Difference of Time be only imaginary; Then why do I not N ● w know, that which I shall know To morrow? |
A97067 | If all Actings be new Discoveries, How and When can wee be said to Remember? |
A97067 | If every thing be the Recipient of its own Essence, must therfore this Essence needs be Truth? |
A97067 | If he ask therfore, Doe they leave us any latitude in any other Commandements? |
A97067 | If it be, then must it exist, else you allow it but a bare Notionall Being; And if it exist, mu ● t it not be that which you call actus secundus? |
A97067 | If so, then I demand, From whence they are received? |
A97067 | If so, then how comes it to passe, that the Soule needs the service of the Body? |
A97067 | If so, then what is the difference between an Act of Sinning, and a Course of Sinning? |
A97067 | If the Magnets Essence be the higher degree of Light, Why hath not the Magnet the use of Reason? |
A97067 | If the One be Positive, why not the Other? |
A97067 | If the Stone understood, and the Soule understanding, be the Same; then when began this Unity, ● ● ● ● Identy? |
A97067 | If there be a prius and posterius in Appearing why not in Being? |
A97067 | If you ask What this Substantiall Form is? |
A97067 | If you aske What is the Form of this Activity( or Actuality rather) of this Actus primus which is the Soules Essence, If it be not Rationall Workings? |
A97067 | Is it not Reason? |
A97067 | Is it then his first Argument, propounded towards the end of the first chapter? |
A97067 | Is therefore all Being the Same? |
A97067 | It is true, it do ● h so: But( shall I speak it once for all?) |
A97067 | Knowest thou not that I can pray to my Father, and he will send ● e more then twelve Legions of Angels? |
A97067 | Lastly, How passeth( saith he) this Light from the Vnderstanding to the Soule? |
A97067 | Lastly, why may not this and other Faculties be produced in the Soule and with the Soule, by immediate creation, from God? |
A97067 | May not a Line disagree from its measure, by being too Long, as well as by being too Short? |
A97067 | May not an Essence Be without Action, because it can not Act without Action? |
A97067 | Must its Essence be Action, because its Efficacy is Action? |
A97067 | Nay when two Drops of Water are separated, or conjoyned, is there any Essentiall or Reall Mutation in either? |
A97067 | Nay why should an Artist be more skilfull in his Trade then another? |
A97067 | Next, why may not the Soule, or Vnderstanding( whether you will) receive this Light of Reason from another Creature? |
A97067 | Now if Likenesse be a Reall Relation; why may not Vnlikenesse be also a relation Reall? |
A97067 | Now if Malum Metaphysicum, a Negation, a Non- Ens, may be Bonum Morale, what shall be the Malum Morale opposite to this Bonum? |
A97067 | Now this shews perhaps, That the Morall Virtues are Vnited in One generall Essence: But how appears it, That this Essence is Vnity? |
A97067 | Now, what is the Lawfullnesse of an Action, but its Morall Goodnesse? |
A97067 | Objiciet forsan aliquis; An igitur[ Socrates est doctus] perinde est ac[ omnis homo est doctus?] |
A97067 | Or 3 I ask, whether Appearing and not- Appearing be a Reall or onely Imaginary difference? |
A97067 | Or Can he produce more but Will not? |
A97067 | Or did they then contract this Unity, when first the Soul did actually Know it? |
A97067 | Or( if it doe) doth it pro ● e ▪ that this One Essence is Vnity? |
A97067 | Otherwise ▪ what will be the difference between Ignorance and Errour, between Silence and a Lye? |
A97067 | Otherwise, How could it be better for that man( which betrayed our Saviour) that he had never been born? |
A97067 | Secondly, If all Beings be but Gradually distinct: I demand Whether the Essence of a Man, or the Essence of a Magnet be the more Intense degree? |
A97067 | Secondly, If one action give the Soule a Coexistence to all ● ternity, then what doth the Second and Subsequent Acts produce? |
A97067 | Sed quàm benè convenit haec definitio axiomati Proprio, quod tamen illi est altera species axiomatis Specialis? |
A97067 | Sed replico; An[ omnis homo est rationalis] idem valet ac[ omne animal est rationale?] |
A97067 | Si semperde parte ▪ licèt de unâ parte dicatur, quid impedit quin de aliâ negetur, ita ut& affirmatio& negatio sint simul verae? |
A97067 | Situs est dispositio partium corporis in loco; quid hoc aliud quàm modus? |
A97067 | So then, what is the Form of this primus Actus? |
A97067 | That all things did exist[ in their Beings] ab omni aeterno; And are they now but under ● Decree?) |
A97067 | That the whole Aggregatum, the whole Heap or Multitude of Creatures do make One World? |
A97067 | That( in the same manner) severall Acts doe constitute One Soule? |
A97067 | The Act, or the Power? |
A97067 | The Argument was this, The Vnderstanding is nothing but a Ray of the Divine Nature,& c. And is not Truth the same? |
A97067 | The Eare can tell us, That it hears no Noise,( for how can it since there is none?) |
A97067 | There is One Sunne; but is this Vnity Essentiall to it? |
A97067 | Therefore First, I ask, Whether there be not the same reason for Succession in Time, that is for Extension in Place? |
A97067 | Therefore what? |
A97067 | This Argument? |
A97067 | This being premised, I ask, Whether this One Emanation which his Lordship seeks to establish, be Really distinct from God or no? |
A97067 | This not being well weighed saith he, hath raised that Question,[ How God should see All things?] |
A97067 | Vnity then being so inseparable, as without which God could not be what he is, May it not be said to be Co- essentiall to him? |
A97067 | Was there any Detraction, or Addition of Essence, or any Reality, that concerned Adams person, at such time as his children were born? |
A97067 | We account those S ● ones precious, that have in them some rare Vertues: And why not the Soul, indued with so Divine a Faculty? |
A97067 | Were they the Same before the Stone was actually understood? |
A97067 | What Principle to enform, that it rained yesterday& is faire to day? |
A97067 | What are the degrees of Heat or Cold in this or that Simple? |
A97067 | What can be the Form of Rationality, but ipsa Rationalitas? |
A97067 | What doth it Act? |
A97067 | What hinders but that every man should be praescius futuri? |
A97067 | What is the Form of it? |
A97067 | What is the Fountain from which they are communicated? |
A97067 | What is the difference between the Once committing of a sinful Act, and the Oft Reiterating of it? |
A97067 | Whether Dictamnum be a Soveraign Balm? |
A97067 | Whether Tobacco be hot or cold? |
A97067 | Whether it were so destroyed? |
A97067 | Whether the Philosophers Stone, or a Perpetuall Motion, be possibile? |
A97067 | Whether this or that were Plato''s or Aristotle''s Opinion? |
A97067 | Whether, in answering an Objection, he doe not overthrow his principall Argument? |
A97067 | Who is it that receiveth from the Womb of Eternity that reasonable creature, but the creature received? |
A97067 | Why are we exhorted to Cease from evill; if every Act be Eternall, and whatsoever succeeds can be but the Same? |
A97067 | Why do we allow, that Faith doth concurrere effica ● iter ad salutem, but deny the same to Works? |
A97067 | Why do we dispute concerning matters of Fact; as whether Peter were at Rome, and the like? |
A97067 | Why doe we cry down the Lutheran Consubstantiation, as absurd? |
A97067 | Why may not an Infant new born plead his cause as well as the best experienced Lawyer? |
A97067 | Why not Together, as well as Successively, if Time be nothing? |
A97067 | Yea what need is there of the Body ▪ at all? |
A97067 | Yea, how void of Envy at anothers good, and thoughts of Revenging injuries? |
A97067 | You will ask me, What distinction therefore will I allow between actus primus and secundus; between the Agent and its Action? |
A97067 | and againe, What is the Essence of That Essence? |
A97067 | and the Loadstone the true Recipient of the Attractive virtue that is in it? |
A97067 | and the Sunne, the true Recipient of Light? |
A97067 | annon utraque est universalis? |
A97067 | are not they divisible into as many parts, whereof every parcell answers to a portion of that Time? |
A97067 | by one sad stroke who shot Religion, Learning, Piety, what not? |
A97067 | c ● quo non dicatur Doctus? |
A97067 | do they give it a new Being, a new Eternity? |
A97067 | doe Former Actings no way help our Subsequent Acts? |
A97067 | h. e. res sine modo? |
A97067 | how is one said to be learned, another ignorant? |
A97067 | if in his operations we admit not of this choice, to work Thus rather then Th ● ●? |
A97067 | if the Operations be the Souls Essence?) |
A97067 | is it not some Act? |
A97067 | is it not, a Conformity, or a Difformity to a Morall Precept? |
A97067 | must therefore Unity be Positive or Reall? |
A97067 | not by Physicall Production, but by Essentiall Emanation? |
A97067 | or Whether they be some thing or nothing? |
A97067 | or would there have been afterwards, if all except Adam had been swept away? |
A97067 | quid hoc aliud quàm modus? |
A97067 | quomodo mensurabitur aliquid aut dividetur ubi nulla extensio, nullae partes? |
A97067 | shall that be also a Non- En ● ● If it be, then how can it be contrary to the other? |
A97067 | what is the benefit of study, and of experience? |
A97067 | what, To be a Substance? |
A97067 | whether he must needs be Infinite, because he is One; or One because he is Infinite? |
A97067 | which Argument? |