This is a table of type trigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.
trigram | frequency |
---|---|
that is to | 96 |
the nature of | 95 |
is to say | 94 |
so far as | 84 |
it is not | 82 |
of the word | 75 |
and of the | 75 |
in so far | 74 |
there is no | 69 |
there is a | 68 |
the history of | 64 |
on the other | 64 |
in order to | 63 |
the theory of | 61 |
the use of | 60 |
work of art | 60 |
of the spirit | 59 |
that it is | 57 |
in which the | 56 |
one of the | 56 |
as it is | 55 |
the expression of | 55 |
as well as | 54 |
that there is | 54 |
which is the | 53 |
of the beautiful | 52 |
that of the | 52 |
the other hand | 51 |
in the same | 51 |
parts of speech | 51 |
the aesthetic fact | 51 |
in other words | 51 |
the radical element | 49 |
we do not | 49 |
critique of the | 48 |
what is the | 47 |
of the language | 46 |
as to the | 45 |
the meaning of | 44 |
of the aesthetic | 43 |
it may be | 42 |
to be the | 42 |
is not a | 42 |
is to be | 41 |
the name of | 41 |
of the soul | 41 |
point of view | 41 |
according to the | 41 |
it would be | 40 |
nature of the | 40 |
that we have | 40 |
but it is | 40 |
part of the | 39 |
a number of | 39 |
the work of | 39 |
of the human | 39 |
it does not | 38 |
the fact that | 38 |
it is a | 38 |
sidenote critique of | 38 |
that which is | 37 |
is not the | 37 |
form of the | 36 |
by means of | 36 |
of a language | 36 |
of the same | 36 |
the science of | 36 |
to be a | 35 |
that they are | 34 |
looked upon as | 34 |
it has been | 34 |
the origin of | 34 |
and in the | 33 |
this is the | 33 |
works of art | 33 |
theory of the | 33 |
and that the | 33 |
more or less | 32 |
at the same | 32 |
far as it | 31 |
the same time | 31 |
as in the | 31 |
or of the | 31 |
to say that | 30 |
it is the | 30 |
the principle of | 30 |
the concept of | 30 |
the end of | 29 |
of the radical | 29 |
in respect to | 29 |
and so on | 29 |
of the two | 29 |
the art of | 29 |
the philosophy of | 29 |
in the first | 28 |
they may be | 28 |
the existence of | 28 |
the distinction between | 28 |
i do not | 28 |
which we have | 28 |
if it be | 28 |
a work of | 28 |
the natural sciences | 28 |
the method of | 28 |
which may be | 28 |
as they are | 28 |
may be said | 28 |
the form of | 27 |
the same as | 27 |
forms of the | 27 |
they are not | 27 |
artistic and literary | 27 |
and the like | 27 |
the aesthetic of | 26 |
the study of | 26 |
which they are | 26 |
meaning of the | 26 |
to do with | 26 |
of which the | 26 |
the world of | 26 |
the truth of | 25 |
which is not | 25 |
of the verb | 25 |
the point of | 25 |
a kind of | 25 |
did you see | 25 |
it is impossible | 25 |
he does not | 25 |
the idea of | 24 |
use of the | 24 |
the language of | 24 |
be said to | 24 |
of the individual | 24 |
the names of | 24 |
we have already | 24 |
of the most | 24 |
of the world | 24 |
far as they | 24 |
on the contrary | 24 |
we must not | 24 |
that there are | 23 |
what do you | 23 |
the difference between | 23 |
of a word | 23 |
the sense of | 23 |
some of the | 23 |
the same way | 23 |
out of the | 23 |
of language is | 23 |
a matter of | 23 |
because it is | 23 |
in the sentence | 23 |
the parts of | 23 |
of the languages | 23 |
said to be | 22 |
to have been | 22 |
which it is | 22 |
is the same | 22 |
it will be | 22 |
it must be | 22 |
the english language | 22 |
not to be | 22 |
end of the | 21 |
be looked upon | 21 |
this or that | 21 |
in such a | 21 |
the place of | 21 |
of art and | 21 |
in like manner | 21 |
we are not | 21 |
as we have | 21 |
in the house | 21 |
a series of | 21 |
because they are | 21 |
that he is | 20 |
in the history | 20 |
say that the | 20 |
of the tongue | 20 |
they do not | 20 |
of the arts | 20 |
the aesthetic activity | 20 |
of the ugly | 20 |
the word is | 20 |
of the artist | 20 |
is impossible to | 20 |
and this is | 20 |
language of the | 20 |
this does not | 20 |
as regards the | 20 |
can only be | 20 |
to each other | 19 |
the same thing | 19 |
of speech are | 19 |
the human mind | 19 |
of the other | 19 |
whom did you | 19 |
the practical activity | 19 |
that we are | 19 |
latin and greek | 19 |
in the world | 19 |
of the nature | 19 |
the problem of | 19 |
as it were | 19 |
and the other | 19 |
of the words | 19 |
of the theory | 19 |
in this case | 19 |
be able to | 19 |
organs of speech | 19 |
space and time | 18 |
at the end | 18 |
that art is | 18 |
the beautiful and | 18 |
that in the | 18 |
the works of | 18 |
of the first | 18 |
in the verb | 18 |
of the name | 18 |
in the sense | 18 |
of the sentence | 18 |
the course of | 18 |
it is necessary | 18 |
a sort of | 18 |
the doctrine of | 18 |
seems to be | 18 |
by no means | 18 |
it is true | 17 |
of all the | 17 |
and it is | 17 |
which is a | 17 |
difference between the | 17 |
the life of | 17 |
but they are | 17 |
that we can | 17 |
the first place | 17 |
there is the | 17 |
at any rate | 17 |
not in the | 17 |
of the imagination | 17 |
aesthetic of the | 17 |
expressed by the | 17 |
is one of | 17 |
to that of | 17 |
of art as | 17 |
it is only | 17 |
the laws of | 17 |
the influence of | 17 |
is the most | 16 |
and what is | 16 |
the subject of | 16 |
language is not | 16 |
the eighteenth century | 16 |
the relation of | 16 |
philosophy of the | 16 |
the process of | 16 |
footnote refers to | 16 |
that language is | 16 |
when they are | 16 |
it is clear | 16 |
is necessary to | 16 |
of the truth | 16 |
expression in the | 16 |
the beauty of | 16 |
history of the | 16 |
the spirit of | 16 |
such as the | 16 |
refers to the | 16 |
the essence of | 16 |
what are the | 16 |
the possibility of | 16 |
as that of | 16 |
theory of aesthetic | 16 |
the conception of | 16 |
nature of language | 16 |
may have been | 16 |
may be called | 15 |
they are the | 15 |
the speech of | 15 |
the unity of | 15 |
in a manner | 15 |
the position of | 15 |
we have seen | 15 |
the forms of | 15 |
correctness of names | 15 |
subject of discourse | 15 |
which is called | 15 |
in relation to | 15 |
doctrine of the | 15 |
of the old | 15 |
as i was | 15 |
and that of | 15 |
expression of the | 15 |
he is the | 15 |
knowledge of the | 15 |
matter of fact | 15 |
distinction between the | 15 |
of which we | 15 |
the formation of | 15 |
the image of | 15 |
beginning on line | 15 |
as a whole | 15 |
in which it | 15 |
the concepts of | 15 |
and literary history | 15 |
i think that | 15 |
to the same | 15 |
would be the | 15 |
is not to | 15 |
i believe that | 15 |
the sphere of | 15 |
at the most | 14 |
a state of | 14 |
of the natural | 14 |
of the sympathetic | 14 |
should like to | 14 |
the development of | 14 |
from that of | 14 |
the elements of | 14 |
as a matter | 14 |
are the same | 14 |
are to be | 14 |
with the other | 14 |
the power of | 14 |
may be used | 14 |
the organs of | 14 |
an element of | 14 |
but in the | 14 |
in accordance with | 14 |
for the most | 14 |
in which he | 14 |
of the subject | 14 |
nothing to do | 14 |
the languages of | 14 |
there is nothing | 14 |
there are many | 14 |
is that which | 14 |
the representation of | 14 |
do you not | 14 |
which has been | 14 |
one or more | 14 |
in the word | 14 |
to one another | 14 |
the degree of | 14 |
would not be | 14 |
respect to the | 14 |
is no longer | 14 |
or of a | 14 |
of a single | 14 |
make use of | 14 |
of what is | 14 |
and with the | 14 |
to which we | 14 |
belong to the | 14 |
found in the | 13 |
the paragraph beginning | 13 |
the result of | 13 |
of the type | 13 |
this is not | 13 |
the knowledge of | 13 |
of the problem | 13 |
of language and | 13 |
but what is | 13 |
is clear that | 13 |
of the english | 13 |
fact that the | 13 |
of art is | 13 |
for it is | 13 |
with one another | 13 |
conception of the | 13 |
when we have | 13 |
large number of | 13 |
i should like | 13 |
seem to be | 13 |
the activity of | 13 |
the number of | 13 |
subject and object | 13 |
it is possible | 13 |
of such a | 13 |
of the concept | 13 |
an indian language | 13 |
and the same | 13 |
do you say | 13 |
the imitation of | 13 |
one of these | 13 |
in that case | 13 |
the question of | 13 |
view of the | 13 |
or any other | 13 |
two or more | 13 |
of the past | 13 |
of artistic and | 13 |
position of the | 13 |
parts of the | 13 |
the mind of | 13 |
relation to the | 13 |
by the use | 13 |
the critique of | 13 |
the pleasure of | 13 |
is nothing but | 13 |
made up of | 13 |
but we must | 13 |
of view of | 13 |
science of the | 13 |
the thought of | 13 |
in which they | 13 |
would have been | 13 |
as far as | 13 |
likely to be | 13 |
the character of | 13 |
of the dialogue | 13 |
that is not | 13 |
the verb to | 13 |
of the three | 13 |
one and the | 13 |
the notion of | 13 |
the beautiful is | 12 |
concept of the | 12 |
in a sense | 12 |
to be found | 12 |
in the least | 12 |
all the other | 12 |
the most part | 12 |
one of them | 12 |
would be a | 12 |
the attempt to | 12 |
is also a | 12 |
held to be | 12 |
as we know | 12 |
the most important | 12 |
to the paragraph | 12 |
quality of the | 12 |
to show that | 12 |
nature of art | 12 |
and by the | 12 |
be said of | 12 |
the limits of | 12 |
with which we | 12 |
in the case | 12 |
is true that | 12 |
of the gods | 12 |
which we are | 12 |
i was saying | 12 |
true nature of | 12 |
in the form | 12 |
the presence of | 12 |
it to be | 12 |
of the second | 12 |
he is not | 12 |
but to the | 12 |
of the idea | 12 |
in the other | 12 |
those of the | 12 |
but there is | 12 |
the reproduction of | 12 |
of space and | 12 |
the middle age | 12 |
to the first | 12 |
the analysis of | 12 |
of those who | 12 |
of the origin | 12 |
i should say | 12 |
art of the | 12 |
as distinct from | 12 |
are likely to | 12 |
a part of | 12 |
of the practical | 12 |
unity of the | 12 |
paragraph beginning on | 12 |
has already been | 12 |
must not be | 12 |
the true nature | 12 |
as those of | 12 |
language as a | 12 |
in the course | 12 |
character of the | 12 |
part of a | 12 |
do with the | 12 |
any more than | 12 |
of the real | 12 |
the basis of | 12 |
of the great | 12 |
these are the | 12 |
to the extent | 12 |
be found in | 12 |
there can be | 12 |
the genius of | 12 |
origin of language | 12 |
is not an | 12 |
form of knowledge | 12 |
of a particular | 12 |
ought to be | 12 |
languages of the | 12 |
the analogy of | 12 |
if they are | 12 |
when it is | 12 |
there is an | 12 |
has sometimes been | 12 |
with that of | 12 |
of the artistic | 11 |
we have not | 11 |
in the aesthetic | 11 |
that all things | 11 |
is that of | 11 |
the rest of | 11 |
of the form | 11 |
to make a | 11 |
in the latter | 11 |
words may be | 11 |
any one of | 11 |
a great deal | 11 |
the nineteenth century | 11 |
the tendency to | 11 |
for the same | 11 |
is a very | 11 |
to which the | 11 |
between the two | 11 |
image of the | 11 |
of the body | 11 |
which can be | 11 |
belongs to the | 11 |
it can be | 11 |
that the word | 11 |
the criticism of | 11 |
is not so | 11 |
we find that | 11 |
do you mean | 11 |
in this sense | 11 |
identical with the | 11 |
more and more | 11 |
the impossibility of | 11 |
to the aesthetic | 11 |
made use of | 11 |
and may be | 11 |
be used as | 11 |
pleasure and pain | 11 |
a large number | 11 |
the syntactic relations | 11 |
the quality of | 11 |
such words as | 11 |
more than a | 11 |
due to the | 11 |
but if the | 11 |
is not always | 11 |
to be in | 11 |
to believe that | 11 |
and on the | 11 |
so long as | 11 |
are we to | 11 |
can be no | 11 |
whether it be | 11 |
of the ideal | 11 |
and there are | 11 |
a group of | 11 |
the value of | 11 |
as is the | 11 |
to suppose that | 11 |
the object of | 11 |
that it was | 11 |
the case of | 11 |
of the process | 11 |
on the whole | 11 |
the first time | 11 |
the moment of | 11 |
do not know | 11 |
which are the | 11 |
consciousness of the | 11 |
is in the | 11 |
to those of | 11 |
it seems to | 11 |
the first of | 11 |
in the middle | 11 |
or in the | 11 |
existence of a | 11 |
for the first | 11 |
may be a | 11 |
problem of the | 11 |
is the meaning | 10 |
to the expression | 10 |
art and science | 10 |
to be an | 10 |
we pass from | 10 |
and is the | 10 |
of his own | 10 |
the language is | 10 |
sense of the | 10 |
two forms of | 10 |
of speech and | 10 |
is of the | 10 |
i am not | 10 |
very much as | 10 |
we have a | 10 |
a science of | 10 |
in all the | 10 |
of a given | 10 |
is said to | 10 |
the discovery of | 10 |
as to whether | 10 |
is apt to | 10 |
work of the | 10 |
are in the | 10 |
it is in | 10 |
to some extent | 10 |
which is an | 10 |
we have the | 10 |
it in the | 10 |
of the names | 10 |
imitation of nature | 10 |
to have the | 10 |
that is true | 10 |
of the poet | 10 |
the progress of | 10 |
to express the | 10 |
form of a | 10 |
the criterion of | 10 |
the human spirit | 10 |
in some way | 10 |
if i am | 10 |
the domain of | 10 |
the son of | 10 |
the beautiful as | 10 |
of this sort | 10 |
elements of speech | 10 |
to have a | 10 |
philosophy of history | 10 |
arising from the | 10 |
and is not | 10 |
by way of | 10 |
is true of | 10 |
that i am | 10 |
been able to | 10 |
with those of | 10 |
expression of a | 10 |
the sounds of | 10 |
he did not | 10 |
which i have | 10 |
may be expressed | 10 |
it should be | 10 |
some of them | 10 |
is likely to | 10 |
not so much | 10 |
theory of language | 10 |
there are some | 10 |
the t of | 10 |
the help of | 10 |
same way as | 10 |
question of the | 10 |
the function of | 10 |
has not been | 10 |
language is a | 10 |
the characteristics of | 10 |
it is an | 10 |
the giver of | 10 |
art is the | 10 |
content and form | 10 |
there would be | 10 |
is found in | 10 |
a question of | 10 |
of their own | 10 |
which cannot be | 10 |
in the old | 10 |
that may be | 10 |
will not be | 10 |
in the eighteenth | 10 |
of the nineteenth | 10 |
the historian of | 10 |
the letter rho | 10 |
and of its | 10 |
no reason to | 10 |
to the nature | 10 |
a form of | 10 |
number of words | 10 |
those which are | 10 |
that i have | 10 |
the author of | 10 |
the man of | 10 |
of the one | 10 |
this is a | 9 |
of the present | 9 |
examples of the | 9 |
to the other | 9 |
the necessity of | 9 |
is possible to | 9 |
that it does | 9 |
have to be | 9 |
may be true | 9 |
precisely the same | 9 |
of the mind | 9 |
the human body | 9 |
more of the | 9 |
english and german | 9 |
with the help | 9 |
of the history | 9 |
of the true | 9 |
the impression of | 9 |
in the use | 9 |
the latter is | 9 |
the body of | 9 |
that we must | 9 |
no less than | 9 |
that all the | 9 |
definition of the | 9 |
the application of | 9 |
that which has | 9 |
make up the | 9 |
the words of | 9 |
that a language | 9 |
and the most | 9 |
felt as a | 9 |
that the name | 9 |
from the point | 9 |
nature of things | 9 |
of the expression | 9 |
to that which | 9 |
of the latter | 9 |
which is in | 9 |
is customary to | 9 |
greater or less | 9 |
has to be | 9 |
history of language | 9 |
of the senses | 9 |
there are languages | 9 |
and there is | 9 |
in the brain | 9 |
who did you | 9 |
far as he | 9 |
to be understood | 9 |
they must be | 9 |
apart from the | 9 |
reproduction of the | 9 |
theory of art | 9 |
the true and | 9 |
how can we | 9 |
of all that | 9 |
true and false | 9 |
the two words | 9 |
that the aesthetic | 9 |
there may be | 9 |
manner in which | 9 |
the appearance of | 9 |
would be no | 9 |
in the english | 9 |
we shall have | 9 |
what is called | 9 |
the confusion between | 9 |
of a certain | 9 |
middle high german | 9 |
precisely because it | 9 |
we have no | 9 |
that the world | 9 |
at the beginning | 9 |
is used in | 9 |
does not exist | 9 |
elements of the | 9 |
it will not | 9 |
as compared with | 9 |
is the expression | 9 |
in the most | 9 |
it cannot be | 9 |
names of the | 9 |
all of them | 9 |
of this is | 9 |
are no longer | 9 |
in its turn | 9 |
which have been | 9 |
is expressed by | 9 |
the consciousness of | 9 |
genius of the | 9 |
representation of the | 9 |
there must be | 9 |
not succeed in | 9 |
the greater part | 9 |
of a new | 9 |
in addition to | 9 |
that are not | 9 |
be expressed by | 9 |
the independence of | 9 |
of pure intuition | 9 |
great deal of | 9 |
to which they | 9 |
is divided into | 9 |
that he has | 9 |
state of the | 9 |
the relation between | 9 |
in spite of | 9 |
that is the | 9 |
same as the | 9 |
it is customary | 9 |
that do not | 9 |
understanding of the | 9 |
the extent that | 9 |
of the parts | 9 |
a radical element | 9 |
to be of | 9 |
of the general | 9 |
in indian tongues | 9 |
that you will | 9 |
as soon as | 9 |
of the theoretic | 9 |
half of the | 9 |
may not be | 9 |
a theory of | 9 |
in the words | 9 |
of the elements | 9 |
has been said | 9 |
we find the | 9 |
appears to be | 9 |
in all its | 9 |
is given to | 9 |
not of the | 9 |
old high german | 9 |
of the greatest | 9 |
but this does | 9 |
the evolution of | 9 |
expressed in the | 9 |
name of the | 9 |
if it were | 9 |
of language are | 9 |
the significance of | 9 |
to which it | 9 |
be supposed to | 9 |
that the languages | 9 |
said to have | 9 |
the sound of | 9 |
the name is | 9 |
as a rule | 9 |
well as the | 9 |
the physically beautiful | 9 |
as the science | 9 |
that they have | 9 |
the type of | 9 |
on the same | 9 |
the feeling of | 8 |
of the man | 8 |
the production of | 8 |
have nothing to | 8 |
son of hermes | 8 |
in the second | 8 |
by the word | 8 |
upon as a | 8 |
we should have | 8 |
upon art as | 8 |
of that which | 8 |
lies in the | 8 |
has often been | 8 |
will always be | 8 |
is so called | 8 |
of which is | 8 |
should say that | 8 |
a language is | 8 |
in saying that | 8 |
have seen that | 8 |
the whole of | 8 |
they are in | 8 |
the flow of | 8 |
things which are | 8 |
are the most | 8 |
as there are | 8 |
in a certain | 8 |
is to make | 8 |
the majority of | 8 |
of language as | 8 |
of all things | 8 |
must be a | 8 |
the reason why | 8 |
and the beautiful | 8 |
which does not | 8 |
of the last | 8 |
that this is | 8 |
to admit that | 8 |
language is the | 8 |
the force of | 8 |
in modern times | 8 |
language has its | 8 |
and we find | 8 |
the theoretic spirit | 8 |
a great many | 8 |
the first to | 8 |
he may be | 8 |
on the first | 8 |
independence of art | 8 |
what you say | 8 |
of human activity | 8 |
is of no | 8 |
way in which | 8 |
that the concept | 8 |
that we do | 8 |
those who have | 8 |
and to the | 8 |
at one time | 8 |
in the present | 8 |
all of these | 8 |
the human race | 8 |
with which the | 8 |
each of these | 8 |
more than the | 8 |
which he is | 8 |
to a certain | 8 |
to speak of | 8 |
to understand the | 8 |
the meaning is | 8 |
noun and verb | 8 |
too much of | 8 |
seems to have | 8 |
of the physical | 8 |
there was a | 8 |
to all the | 8 |
imitation of the | 8 |
the order of | 8 |
by those who | 8 |
each other in | 8 |
for all that | 8 |
value of the | 8 |
should not be | 8 |
the fact of | 8 |
back to the | 8 |
conception of art | 8 |
the consideration of | 8 |
of the earth | 8 |
or that the | 8 |
do not think | 8 |
be expressed in | 8 |
perception of the | 8 |
just as the | 8 |
rest of the | 8 |
to give a | 8 |
art and of | 8 |
as in english | 8 |
of the concrete | 8 |
such as are | 8 |
did you say | 8 |
appear to be | 8 |
activity of externalization | 8 |
this may be | 8 |
used as a | 8 |
the manner in | 8 |
place of the | 8 |
may be made | 8 |
it is to | 8 |
which we can | 8 |
of the author | 8 |
is connected with | 8 |
he would have | 8 |
such as those | 8 |
it is well | 8 |
study of the | 8 |
we know that | 8 |
of poetry and | 8 |
that of a | 8 |
true that the | 8 |
not belong to | 8 |
that can be | 8 |
aesthetic fact is | 8 |
and what are | 8 |
of the renaissance | 8 |
from one another | 8 |
the effect of | 8 |
we can say | 8 |
it may have | 8 |
may also be | 8 |
as much as | 8 |
all the rest | 8 |
between the aesthetic | 8 |
significance of the | 8 |
of the whole | 8 |
or to the | 8 |
place in the | 8 |
the useful and | 8 |
or the other | 8 |
of thought and | 8 |
distinct from the | 8 |
of the intellect | 8 |
the power to | 8 |
to do so | 8 |
and from the | 8 |
in terms of | 8 |
is not only | 8 |
of a sentence | 8 |
the search for | 8 |
the desire of | 8 |
this is true | 8 |
the same meaning | 8 |
to be sure | 8 |
a word like | 8 |
of the feelings | 8 |
it is important | 8 |
of speech is | 8 |
that which he | 8 |
beautiful and the | 8 |
of a thing | 8 |
the principles of | 8 |
intuition and expression | 8 |
concept of a | 8 |
and the ugly | 8 |
the relations between | 8 |
a single word | 8 |
at the time | 8 |
and when i | 8 |
is at the | 8 |
all of the | 8 |
and literary classes | 8 |
that he who | 8 |
the names which | 8 |
the speaker and | 8 |
at the moment | 8 |
you say of | 8 |
is a question | 8 |
from each other | 8 |
relation between the | 8 |
is able to | 8 |
on the one | 8 |
of the content | 8 |
to make clear | 8 |
all things are | 8 |
of nature and | 8 |
not the same | 8 |
owing to the | 8 |
we may say | 8 |
writers of the | 8 |
to the world | 8 |
is the case | 8 |
in my opinion | 8 |
for this reason | 8 |
at first sight | 8 |
in which we | 8 |
idea of the | 8 |
first of all | 8 |
of speech sounds | 8 |
greater part of | 8 |
is the aesthetic | 8 |
the line of | 8 |
of the work | 8 |
it would seem | 8 |
in the theory | 8 |
between art and | 8 |
a means of | 8 |
is a true | 7 |
the english word | 7 |
can be made | 7 |
based on the | 7 |
the reason for | 7 |
art does not | 7 |
to define the | 7 |
in a word | 7 |
as in latin | 7 |
of a number | 7 |
as contrasted with | 7 |
of the more | 7 |
language as the | 7 |
the two forms | 7 |
supposed to be | 7 |
conceived of as | 7 |
the state of | 7 |
nothing but a | 7 |
the way to | 7 |
fire in the | 7 |
if we take | 7 |
the mere fact | 7 |
not able to | 7 |
the perception of | 7 |
according to this | 7 |
the things which | 7 |
same may be | 7 |
believe that the | 7 |
enable us to | 7 |
some of these | 7 |
it to the | 7 |
we shall see | 7 |
have had a | 7 |
they cannot be | 7 |
be true or | 7 |
result of the | 7 |
the same may | 7 |
such a manner | 7 |
we can hardly | 7 |
the field of | 7 |
the soul of | 7 |
it goes without | 7 |
does not belong | 7 |
the physical fact | 7 |
the invention of | 7 |
of this type | 7 |
so that the | 7 |
art is a | 7 |
we have been | 7 |
be made to | 7 |
is related to | 7 |
are expressed by | 7 |
of a king | 7 |
of taste and | 7 |
such and such | 7 |
and we may | 7 |
points of view | 7 |
seems to me | 7 |
of the different | 7 |
and that in | 7 |
not wish to | 7 |
in a state | 7 |
it is evident | 7 |
and they are | 7 |
limits of the | 7 |
upon it as | 7 |
has always been | 7 |
a view to | 7 |
means of the | 7 |
the error of | 7 |
far as to | 7 |
so much the | 7 |
we know of | 7 |
to indicate the | 7 |
from the aesthetic | 7 |
the methods of | 7 |
of the former | 7 |
the verb is | 7 |
to make it | 7 |
the creation of | 7 |
be the same | 7 |
the sentence as | 7 |
in the sphere | 7 |
the subject and | 7 |
in a number | 7 |
goes without saying | 7 |
philosophy of language | 7 |
in the mind | 7 |
the world is | 7 |
think that i | 7 |
we can only | 7 |
to the second | 7 |
the reason of | 7 |
is but a | 7 |
the word to | 7 |
the manner of | 7 |
the truth is | 7 |
in any case | 7 |
degree of synthesis | 7 |
the old long | 7 |
most of the | 7 |
is well to | 7 |
to saying that | 7 |
the time of | 7 |
speak of the | 7 |
determined by the | 7 |
with the particular | 7 |
there is another | 7 |
types of concepts | 7 |
when they have | 7 |
have already seen | 7 |
to the idea | 7 |
the product of | 7 |
in this way | 7 |
of the comic | 7 |
son of a | 7 |
may be looked | 7 |
region of the | 7 |
is that it | 7 |
which is also | 7 |
to the present | 7 |
nothing but the | 7 |
is merely a | 7 |
the relations of | 7 |
seem to have | 7 |
form and content | 7 |
know how to | 7 |
no difficulty in | 7 |
added to the | 7 |
culture of the | 7 |
of which they | 7 |
we have shown | 7 |
point of the | 7 |
it be not | 7 |
with a view | 7 |
account of the | 7 |
attention to the | 7 |
the opposite of | 7 |
is implied in | 7 |
and we must | 7 |
which are called | 7 |
this would be | 7 |
to avoid the | 7 |
in the noun | 7 |
as he is | 7 |
of the eighteenth | 7 |
intuition and the | 7 |
and in so | 7 |
the case with | 7 |
as there is | 7 |
is the name | 7 |
been looked upon | 7 |
to see that | 7 |
a word as | 7 |
position in the | 7 |
those that are | 7 |
of feeling and | 7 |
his conception of | 7 |
that have been | 7 |
yet it is | 7 |
as to its | 7 |
say of the | 7 |
such a word | 7 |
saying that the | 7 |
with the aesthetic | 7 |
into the nature | 7 |
do not possess | 7 |
a philosophy of | 7 |
not have been | 7 |
does not mean | 7 |
the general drift | 7 |
something of the | 7 |
illustrated by the | 7 |
and of a | 7 |
the failure to | 7 |
in the language | 7 |
is the first | 7 |
far from being | 7 |
of the middle | 7 |
mind of the | 7 |
modes of expression | 7 |
the seventeenth century | 7 |
when he is | 7 |
true or false | 7 |
is important to | 7 |
the importance of | 7 |
to say the | 7 |
of human speech | 7 |
that the artist | 7 |
of which it | 7 |
that it may | 7 |
a language has | 7 |
the one and | 7 |
and when we | 7 |
possess the power | 7 |
side by side | 7 |
of the various | 7 |
which he has | 7 |
it is quite | 7 |
things are in | 7 |
a language may | 7 |
the perfection of | 7 |
sounds of speech | 7 |
and one of | 7 |
the same word | 7 |
beauty of the | 7 |
and that is | 7 |
and that which | 7 |
of each thing | 7 |
a piece of | 7 |
verb to be | 7 |
what has been | 7 |
be said that | 7 |
in many languages | 7 |
it as a | 7 |
there is also | 7 |
portion of the | 7 |
apt to be | 7 |
to the most | 7 |
indian language of | 7 |
power of the | 7 |
art is not | 7 |
we cannot say | 7 |
and does not | 7 |
out of a | 7 |
accordance with the | 7 |
the union of | 7 |
as we are | 7 |
that they were | 7 |
we should be | 7 |
return to the | 7 |
the only way | 7 |
as of the | 7 |
the nature and | 7 |
of them are | 7 |
one or the | 7 |
that is a | 7 |
used in the | 7 |
of an individual | 7 |
most important of | 7 |
if you will | 7 |
if we are | 7 |
the sake of | 6 |
to return to | 6 |
is tantamount to | 6 |
has its own | 6 |
those who are | 6 |
application of the | 6 |
aesthetic or artistic | 6 |
such languages as | 6 |
face to face | 6 |
in process of | 6 |
of which he | 6 |
first of these | 6 |
altogether different from | 6 |
shows that the | 6 |
this has been | 6 |
which is at | 6 |
they are used | 6 |
to hear the | 6 |
based upon the | 6 |
languages in which | 6 |
fact of the | 6 |
translation of the | 6 |
the differentiation of | 6 |
it is as | 6 |
likely to have | 6 |
in other languages | 6 |
expression is a | 6 |
such is the | 6 |
that the soul | 6 |
useful and the | 6 |
occupied with the | 6 |
that the first | 6 |
of words or | 6 |
of the original | 6 |
me to be | 6 |
critique of aesthetic | 6 |
the rise of | 6 |
have been the | 6 |
for the sake | 6 |
knows how to | 6 |
from this it | 6 |
drift of the | 6 |
the ugly is | 6 |
an act of | 6 |
origin of art | 6 |
there are no | 6 |
is a kind | 6 |
is but one | 6 |
is the opposite | 6 |
of these is | 6 |
to face with | 6 |
and we have | 6 |
with the old | 6 |
man of taste | 6 |
we know nothing | 6 |
of the unity | 6 |
in a more | 6 |
be understood as | 6 |
the middle ages | 6 |
he speaks of | 6 |
they are to | 6 |
the purpose of | 6 |
the light of | 6 |
it is highly | 6 |
it is also | 6 |
of the principle | 6 |
this was the | 6 |
and when the | 6 |
the opinion of | 6 |
the correctness of | 6 |
correspond to the | 6 |
it is likely | 6 |
what we have | 6 |
the phonetic drift | 6 |
to give an | 6 |
the last century | 6 |
we speak of | 6 |
in what way | 6 |
there have been | 6 |
other forms of | 6 |
to be done | 6 |
consists of a | 6 |
the same or | 6 |
this means that | 6 |
in this respect | 6 |
them to be | 6 |
of the sound | 6 |
for there is | 6 |
more than one | 6 |
language may be | 6 |
of mystical aesthetic | 6 |
may be the | 6 |
as we pass | 6 |
superior to the | 6 |
take place in | 6 |
the ideal of | 6 |
expressed by a | 6 |
the difficulty of | 6 |
not likely to | 6 |
to deal with | 6 |
with reference to | 6 |
speech is a | 6 |
the treatment of | 6 |
beautiful in nature | 6 |
mean that the | 6 |
second half of | 6 |
in one way | 6 |
a more or | 6 |
in and pull | 6 |
is also the | 6 |
and do not | 6 |
as i am | 6 |
this amounts to | 6 |
of what we | 6 |
to the latter | 6 |
of the concepts | 6 |
of the latin | 6 |
place in a | 6 |
in which all | 6 |
drift toward the | 6 |
can be drawn | 6 |
criticism of the | 6 |
there is but | 6 |
mean to say | 6 |
greek and latin | 6 |
to the old | 6 |
many of them | 6 |
to its own | 6 |
neither beautiful nor | 6 |
the absurdity of | 6 |
know that the | 6 |
be allowed to | 6 |
corresponds to the | 6 |
in his mind | 6 |
great number of | 6 |
givers of names | 6 |
which seems to | 6 |
the sentence is | 6 |
the connexion between | 6 |
in a single | 6 |
without saying that | 6 |
are compelled to | 6 |
but of the | 6 |
but they have | 6 |
a study of | 6 |
is equivalent to | 6 |
change of the | 6 |
upon as the | 6 |
as that which | 6 |
languages that are | 6 |
a time when | 6 |
in a moment | 6 |
of the proposition | 6 |
of the relations | 6 |
from the same | 6 |
the content of | 6 |
a true and | 6 |
for the expression | 6 |
of language which | 6 |
in the life | 6 |
of the activity | 6 |
we have made | 6 |
under the influence | 6 |
of group ii | 6 |
to what we | 6 |
of its own | 6 |
are of the | 6 |
that would be | 6 |
judgments of value | 6 |
the word and | 6 |
syllables and letters | 6 |
to grasp the | 6 |
that we cannot | 6 |
subjective and objective | 6 |
does not follow | 6 |
as i have | 6 |
of the philosophy | 6 |
be considered as | 6 |
is no more | 6 |
the law of | 6 |
nouns and verbs | 6 |
or from the | 6 |
it is generally | 6 |
to the verb | 6 |
they have not | 6 |
they are always | 6 |
of a more | 6 |
thought that the | 6 |
an understanding of | 6 |
of the impressions | 6 |
modification of the | 6 |
but do not | 6 |
by which they | 6 |
all that is | 6 |
opposed to the | 6 |
it is of | 6 |
whether or not | 6 |
and the aesthetic | 6 |
that the content | 6 |
the distribution of | 6 |
of sounds and | 6 |
intuition of the | 6 |
it is always | 6 |
and therefore i | 6 |
course of nature | 6 |
serve as a | 6 |
make up a | 6 |
insight into the | 6 |
to the doctrine | 6 |
not mean that | 6 |
the rhetorical categories | 6 |
is no reason | 6 |
reference to the | 6 |
other parts of | 6 |
the nootka word | 6 |
of science and | 6 |
of the will | 6 |
the verb of | 6 |
of the thing | 6 |
than in the | 6 |
be divided into | 6 |
in respect of | 6 |
a good deal | 6 |
lines and colours | 6 |
arises from the | 6 |
an instance of | 6 |
makes use of | 6 |
and the practical | 6 |
these are not | 6 |
theory of artistic | 6 |
and the true | 6 |
which are not | 6 |
group of languages | 6 |
in the work | 6 |
a man who | 6 |
all the languages | 6 |
use of language | 6 |
think that we | 6 |
of the object | 6 |
that in which | 6 |
and pull out | 6 |
is by no | 6 |
are in a | 6 |
definitions of the | 6 |
pleasure of the | 6 |
a new word | 6 |
as we can | 6 |
let me ask | 6 |
not follow that | 6 |
and the verb | 6 |
and in a | 6 |
sentence as a | 6 |
words in the | 6 |
even in the | 6 |
which would be | 6 |
a name is | 6 |
for a moment | 6 |
to note that | 6 |
of words like | 6 |
even the most | 6 |
the rules of | 6 |
he failed to | 6 |
relation of the | 6 |
for the purpose | 6 |
if there is | 6 |
has nothing to | 6 |
is a great | 6 |
use of it | 6 |
but of a | 6 |
the addition of | 6 |
of the art | 6 |
are apt to | 6 |
but let us | 6 |
english language is | 6 |
of art are | 6 |
there are a | 6 |
is of a | 6 |
the material of | 6 |
the cause of | 6 |
with the same | 6 |
to strike with | 6 |
beautiful nor ugly | 6 |
modifications of the | 6 |
the identity of | 6 |
and therefore he | 6 |
looks upon the | 6 |
say that this | 6 |
of art in | 6 |
like to know | 6 |
spirit of the | 6 |
who do not | 6 |
with the concept | 6 |
analysis of the | 6 |
are in motion | 6 |
true and proper | 6 |
which is more | 6 |
the grammatic processes | 6 |
to wish to | 6 |
may well be | 6 |
the cries of | 6 |
true of the | 6 |
the idea that | 6 |
of each language | 6 |
at other times | 6 |
of the new | 6 |
theories of the | 6 |
in the one | 6 |
is the truth | 6 |
he who knows | 6 |
an example of | 6 |
american indian languages | 6 |
because there is | 6 |
element of the | 6 |
expressive of motion | 6 |
in the following | 6 |
to any one | 6 |
each of which | 6 |
of the phonetic | 6 |
of them that | 6 |
the theoretic and | 6 |
grammar and logic | 6 |
is due to | 6 |
imagine that the | 6 |
is like the | 6 |
the categories of | 6 |
he who gives | 6 |
and those of | 6 |
nothing more than | 6 |
if we have | 6 |
of the useful | 6 |
the system of | 6 |
the view of | 6 |
radical element and | 6 |
of the universal | 6 |
to what is | 6 |
word may be | 6 |
all sorts of | 6 |
is supposed to | 6 |
thought of the | 6 |
we need not | 6 |
the growth of | 6 |
he declares that | 6 |
is evident that | 6 |
be compared to | 6 |
relations of the | 6 |
and the image | 6 |
the intuition of | 6 |
he says that | 6 |
is more than | 6 |
to me to | 6 |
sidenote intuition and | 6 |
the alternation of | 6 |
there will be | 6 |
much the same | 6 |
not to the | 6 |
or may not | 6 |
seen that the | 6 |
of the speech | 6 |
to the imagination | 6 |
is there any | 6 |
classification of languages | 6 |
we had better | 6 |
it with the | 6 |
the part of | 6 |
of the speaker | 6 |
the word as | 6 |
is far from | 6 |
must of necessity | 6 |
responsible for the | 6 |
one with the | 6 |
in the preceding | 6 |
which they have | 6 |
is the true | 6 |
many of the | 6 |
put in and | 6 |
meanings of words | 6 |
different from the | 6 |
impression of the | 6 |
of any sort | 6 |
only to the | 6 |
we talk of | 6 |
we find it | 6 |
need not be | 6 |
very far from | 6 |
of all sorts | 6 |
the direction of | 6 |
though it be | 6 |
and the particular | 6 |
the dignity of | 6 |
but we cannot | 6 |
according to a | 6 |
think that you | 6 |
so as to | 6 |
will be the | 6 |
of works of | 6 |
movements of the | 6 |
the classification of | 6 |
thesis of the | 6 |
the letters of | 6 |
is derived from | 6 |
are not the | 6 |
to be used | 6 |
name of a | 6 |
critique of pure | 6 |
and the very | 6 |
that there exist | 6 |
bound up with | 6 |
is a foreign | 6 |
thought of as | 6 |
he has a | 6 |
in a sentence | 6 |
dwell upon the | 6 |
may or may | 6 |
at work in | 6 |
in such cases | 6 |
a man of | 6 |
of words and | 6 |
there is not | 6 |
as a means | 6 |
is rightly called | 6 |
of the historical | 6 |
to recognize the | 6 |
related to the | 6 |
show that the | 6 |
some sort of | 6 |
there is something | 6 |
it is that | 6 |
of the god | 6 |
amounts to saying | 6 |
to be derived | 6 |
history of aesthetic | 6 |
of the things | 6 |
of the many | 6 |
in english we | 6 |
one of those | 6 |
may be found | 6 |
we may call | 6 |
the likeness of | 5 |
away from the | 5 |
of intuitive knowledge | 5 |
just as in | 5 |
the same principle | 5 |
influence of the | 5 |
is ideally superior | 5 |
agree with you | 5 |
the same reason | 5 |
and to be | 5 |
to use the | 5 |
the artist has | 5 |
the fear of | 5 |
the flux of | 5 |
a collection of | 5 |
such as we | 5 |
contained in the | 5 |
from which it | 5 |
while they are | 5 |
and we are | 5 |
the powers of | 5 |
something that is | 5 |
there has been | 5 |
they have been | 5 |
literature and art | 5 |
to refer to | 5 |
only in so | 5 |
the first and | 5 |
but it was | 5 |
is probably the | 5 |
beautiful or ugly | 5 |
the facts of | 5 |
is as good | 5 |
of art to | 5 |
whether there is | 5 |
the artist should | 5 |
are found in | 5 |
and in what | 5 |
the other arts | 5 |
that this was | 5 |
a fact of | 5 |
vast majority of | 5 |
according to their | 5 |
rightly called a | 5 |
and with a | 5 |
instead of a | 5 |
is it to | 5 |
upon the aesthetic | 5 |
a few words | 5 |
would be to | 5 |
the greater number | 5 |
you know that | 5 |
cannot be said | 5 |
in the former | 5 |
them from the | 5 |
have not yet | 5 |
case of the | 5 |
enter into the | 5 |
words which are | 5 |
and if it | 5 |
is not merely | 5 |
regard to the | 5 |
the first syllable | 5 |
in ordinary life | 5 |
of the distinction | 5 |
names at all | 5 |
be called a | 5 |
which have a | 5 |
a word is | 5 |
the vowel of | 5 |
art as a | 5 |
is contained in | 5 |
what may be | 5 |
the diversity of | 5 |
form of activity | 5 |
end of art | 5 |
at last analysis | 5 |
to the natural | 5 |
in a work | 5 |
the personal pronouns | 5 |
we have said | 5 |
at a later | 5 |
that one of | 5 |
of the moment | 5 |
that you are | 5 |
to what extent | 5 |
of radical elements | 5 |
but we have | 5 |
to reduce the | 5 |
literary and artistic | 5 |
of the stem | 5 |
make clear the | 5 |
but he does | 5 |
so that it | 5 |
that we may | 5 |
used to indicate | 5 |
in the body | 5 |
because he is | 5 |
to say of | 5 |
to the sound | 5 |
far as the | 5 |
truth or correctness | 5 |
be admitted that | 5 |
by the position | 5 |
words and the | 5 |
that is more | 5 |
for in the | 5 |
so great a | 5 |
i should not | 5 |
relational concepts in | 5 |
activity of the | 5 |
theoretic and the | 5 |
the real and | 5 |
it is therefore | 5 |
the single word | 5 |
more than human | 5 |
the title of | 5 |
to find that | 5 |
use of names | 5 |
aesthetic activity is | 5 |
the stream of | 5 |
is the fact | 5 |
has been the | 5 |
the universality of | 5 |
the beautiful in | 5 |
a way that | 5 |
to give the | 5 |
are far from | 5 |
of a people | 5 |
has been changed | 5 |
as a predicant | 5 |
majority of languages | 5 |
part of speech | 5 |
they can be | 5 |
in its essence | 5 |
learning to speak | 5 |
powers of the | 5 |
the process is | 5 |
could have been | 5 |
and in this | 5 |
language and culture | 5 |
much of a | 5 |
in one language | 5 |
the sort of | 5 |
is the art | 5 |
giver of the | 5 |
is based on | 5 |
it can only | 5 |
and as the | 5 |
of names is | 5 |
have had to | 5 |
it is different | 5 |
of the typical | 5 |
he must be | 5 |
he looks upon | 5 |
appears to me | 5 |
to modify the | 5 |
if all the | 5 |
gave the name | 5 |
most of us | 5 |
which is always | 5 |
the means of | 5 |
are a few | 5 |
in one word | 5 |
is occupied with | 5 |
be made of | 5 |
element of speech | 5 |
the love of | 5 |
in a flux | 5 |
action of the | 5 |
refer to the | 5 |
instance of the | 5 |
in our day | 5 |
of the linguistic | 5 |
of the organs | 5 |
to the true | 5 |
is different with | 5 |
language which is | 5 |
use of an | 5 |
of any other | 5 |
existence of an | 5 |
modify the significance | 5 |
difference between a | 5 |
we have an | 5 |
the spirit in | 5 |
is that the | 5 |
with the natural | 5 |
that these are | 5 |
of the pure | 5 |
there are two | 5 |
science and of | 5 |
of other languages | 5 |
said of the | 5 |
a system of | 5 |
be necessary to | 5 |
can it be | 5 |
what has already | 5 |
and if of | 5 |
at the renaissance | 5 |
at least in | 5 |
admit that the | 5 |
together with the | 5 |
time when the | 5 |
each of the | 5 |
is expressive of | 5 |
of the actual | 5 |
cries of animals | 5 |
first part of | 5 |
all known languages | 5 |
order of words | 5 |
contrast to the | 5 |
supposed to have | 5 |
of linguistic structure | 5 |
the status of | 5 |
beautiful as the | 5 |
at the expense | 5 |
is used for | 5 |
of the seventeenth | 5 |
will be used | 5 |
divided into the | 5 |
he who is | 5 |
the change of | 5 |
the confusion of | 5 |
it not be | 5 |
and nature of | 5 |
out of which | 5 |
as has been | 5 |
the word in | 5 |
of the search | 5 |
or in a | 5 |
i have been | 5 |
that part of | 5 |
we may be | 5 |
a method of | 5 |
the explanation of | 5 |
of them in | 5 |
so called apo | 5 |
of american indian | 5 |
the instrument of | 5 |
beautiful and of | 5 |
of the church | 5 |
is in fact | 5 |
to indicate that | 5 |
the athabaskan languages | 5 |
is substituted for | 5 |
or they may | 5 |
as they have | 5 |
two or three | 5 |
to such a | 5 |
parts of a | 5 |
to a large | 5 |
is in his | 5 |
in the place | 5 |
is the beautiful | 5 |
the way in | 5 |
idea of plurality | 5 |
all the more | 5 |
is still a | 5 |
they are no | 5 |
at least three | 5 |
indicates that the | 5 |
or as a | 5 |
that i was | 5 |
is not really | 5 |
the same words | 5 |
the man who | 5 |
it has no | 5 |
the preceding chapter | 5 |
are some of | 5 |
i ought to | 5 |
in one of | 5 |
the ideas of | 5 |
differs from the | 5 |
which in the | 5 |
acquainted with the | 5 |
the solution of | 5 |
one of his | 5 |
to this or | 5 |
are expressive of | 5 |
resemblance to the | 5 |
as a historical | 5 |
in the two | 5 |
as the name | 5 |
the aesthetic judgment | 5 |
each other as | 5 |
by any one | 5 |
when it has | 5 |
it is so | 5 |
who gave the | 5 |
of the relative | 5 |
what is it | 5 |
of the verisimilar | 5 |
say that there | 5 |
of concepts and | 5 |
to know how | 5 |
which did not | 5 |
i referred to | 5 |
aspect of the | 5 |
conception of language | 5 |
think that there | 5 |
word in the | 5 |
needs to be | 5 |
the habit of | 5 |
problem of art | 5 |
value in the | 5 |
to be called | 5 |
of sounds that | 5 |
to consist of | 5 |
that they can | 5 |
and so the | 5 |
the other of | 5 |
derived from the | 5 |
appears in the | 5 |
he is a | 5 |
as has already | 5 |
or more of | 5 |
of linguistic expression | 5 |
in one direction | 5 |
it is used | 5 |
which it was | 5 |
when i say | 5 |
of the material | 5 |
is my view | 5 |
the vowels of | 5 |
are true and | 5 |
do not exist | 5 |
the good and | 5 |
of pure reason | 5 |
i have already | 5 |
of spiritual activity | 5 |
be used for | 5 |
a combination of | 5 |
said that the | 5 |
is of course | 5 |
farmer and duckling | 5 |
letters and syllables | 5 |
right in saying | 5 |
deaf and dumb | 5 |
in the natural | 5 |
in connection with | 5 |
that there was | 5 |
would seem to | 5 |
but that they | 5 |
states of the | 5 |
that the true | 5 |
and that we | 5 |
as the old | 5 |
to discover the | 5 |
that names are | 5 |
the act of | 5 |
of the end | 5 |
to the ideal | 5 |
in some languages | 5 |
be at once | 5 |
in place of | 5 |
in the east | 5 |
more than in | 5 |
must be expressed | 5 |
terms of the | 5 |
produced by the | 5 |
elaboration of the | 5 |
he remarks that | 5 |
shall have to | 5 |
movement of the | 5 |
used as the | 5 |
is only a | 5 |
of these are | 5 |
between idea and | 5 |
he is called | 5 |
and let us | 5 |
the mode of | 5 |
origin of speech | 5 |
at the least | 5 |
the most lofty | 5 |
of pure beauty | 5 |
words of the | 5 |
to say what | 5 |
than in english | 5 |
the philosopher of | 5 |
must be the | 5 |
expressive of the | 5 |
the man is | 5 |
qualities of the | 5 |
are used as | 5 |
it is more | 5 |
of which are | 5 |
if there were | 5 |
in the speech | 5 |
compared with the | 5 |
aside from the | 5 |
vowel of the | 5 |
leads to the | 5 |
from the other | 5 |
point in the | 5 |
to assume that | 5 |
treatment of the | 5 |
in an indian | 5 |
the word or | 5 |
in dealing with | 5 |
in another way | 5 |
were at one | 5 |
the derivation of | 5 |
he believed that | 5 |
so and so | 5 |
localized in the | 5 |
form part of | 5 |
but there are | 5 |
conditions in which | 5 |
would be too | 5 |
such a sentence | 5 |
the speakers of | 5 |
and he who | 5 |
is an example | 5 |
to those who | 5 |
it is this | 5 |
in it the | 5 |
the ugly in | 5 |
speak of a | 5 |
of a verb | 5 |
meaning of words | 5 |
and do you | 5 |
fires in the | 5 |
may serve as | 5 |
some kind of | 5 |
is not at | 5 |
fact that it | 5 |
art is to | 5 |
forms of knowledge | 5 |
of the fact | 5 |
they are all | 5 |
of the day | 5 |
extent to which | 5 |
as the most | 5 |
which we may | 5 |
what it is | 5 |
this type of | 5 |
because they have | 5 |
as expressed in | 5 |
the most fundamental | 5 |
all of which | 5 |
i shall be | 5 |
activity of man | 5 |
is not true | 5 |
that of art | 5 |
to the point | 5 |
such a way | 5 |
in the field | 5 |
in contact with | 5 |
and who will | 5 |
form in language | 5 |
but do you | 5 |
it is no | 5 |
to arrive at | 5 |
to a very | 5 |
used in a | 5 |
the sound is | 5 |
the expense of | 5 |
to the more | 5 |
of form and | 5 |
to us in | 5 |
the word itself | 5 |
merely empirical and | 5 |
flow of speech | 5 |
laws of language | 5 |
what we now | 5 |
that make up | 5 |
we must have | 5 |
of the ancient | 5 |
in english the | 5 |
of the beauty | 5 |
other types of | 5 |
nouns may be | 5 |
or at least | 5 |
the man sees | 5 |
into two parts | 5 |
by saying that | 5 |
has also been | 5 |
the great majority | 5 |
we are now | 5 |
the first names | 5 |
critique of judgment | 5 |
general drift of | 5 |
the subjective and | 5 |
looked upon it | 5 |
the business of | 5 |
be derived from | 5 |
back of the | 5 |
language and the | 5 |
and of art | 5 |
is a name | 5 |
the second half | 5 |
there are certain | 5 |
i suspect that | 5 |
that justice is | 5 |
to serve as | 5 |
would say that | 5 |
of the sense | 5 |
expressive of rest | 5 |
as intransitive verbs | 5 |
the first instance | 5 |
laws of the | 5 |
been the first | 5 |
we feel that | 5 |
and of all | 5 |
of the imitation | 5 |
prose and poetry | 5 |
of things or | 5 |
has never been | 5 |
is not necessary | 5 |
concepts of groups | 5 |
that will be | 5 |
the vast majority | 5 |
of the german | 5 |
a principle of | 5 |
any of the | 5 |
on the analogy | 5 |
to form a | 5 |
than that of | 5 |
if he is | 5 |
whether i say | 5 |
one another and | 5 |
be represented by | 5 |
of the inner | 5 |
thought may be | 5 |
the right to | 5 |
but this is | 5 |
all that we | 5 |
of the enquiry | 5 |
thus it is | 5 |
called apo tou | 5 |
language has been | 5 |
lead to the | 5 |
connected with the | 5 |
able to express | 5 |
the beginning of | 5 |
see that the | 5 |
with all the | 5 |
the individuality of | 5 |
of the series | 5 |
to the language | 5 |
i am afraid | 5 |
are supposed to | 5 |
the man whom | 5 |
the possibilities of | 5 |
is not possible | 5 |
and vice versa | 5 |
the first part | 5 |
the inventors of | 5 |
of some of | 5 |
which there is | 5 |
believed that the | 5 |
called natural sciences | 5 |
and that all | 5 |
nature of a | 5 |
from the failure | 5 |
to be able | 5 |
life of the | 5 |
in the cratylus | 5 |
not only of | 5 |
divisions of the | 5 |
of a general | 5 |
it from the | 5 |
criterion of progress | 5 |
the minds of | 5 |
in any way | 5 |
life of language | 5 |
importance of the | 5 |
on other occasions | 5 |
cause and effect | 5 |
for the time | 5 |
body of the | 5 |
in the very | 5 |
that we had | 5 |
the givers of | 5 |
be distinguished from | 5 |
in our own | 5 |
if it is | 5 |
element of language | 5 |
when we are | 5 |
cease to be | 5 |
same as that | 5 |
in the soul | 5 |
the one hand | 5 |
language is an | 5 |
this sort of | 5 |
the assistance of | 5 |
may be considered | 5 |
truth is that | 5 |
analogy of the | 5 |
its identity with | 5 |
that he should | 5 |
but if we | 5 |
can hardly be | 5 |
of foreign origin | 5 |
search for the | 5 |
in latin and | 5 |
answer to the | 5 |
in the naturalistic | 5 |
of aesthetic facts | 5 |
are said to | 5 |
they are merely | 5 |
but does not | 5 |
art as pure | 5 |
be rightly called | 5 |
that if the | 5 |
that is of | 5 |
in the future | 5 |
an independent word | 5 |
be in the | 5 |
use of a | 5 |
we have referred | 5 |
no one is | 5 |
more likely to | 5 |
in that of | 5 |
of expression is | 5 |
be identified with | 5 |
be identical with | 5 |
pass from the | 5 |
reduced to the | 5 |
the intention of | 5 |
of the house | 5 |
science of expression | 5 |
is the reason | 5 |
and if we | 5 |
depend upon the | 5 |
of the limits | 5 |
and yet the | 5 |
the absence of | 5 |
aware of the | 5 |
and when they | 5 |
a glimpse of | 5 |
between the useful | 5 |
each and every | 5 |
the sixteenth century | 5 |
to imply that | 5 |
that he will | 5 |
is always a | 5 |
the service of | 5 |
what is this | 5 |
there is in | 5 |
are not in | 5 |
in the past | 5 |
there was no | 5 |
the form which | 5 |
that it has | 5 |
it could not | 5 |
given to the | 5 |
it is ideally | 5 |
between the theoretic | 5 |
which they were | 5 |
to begin with | 5 |
of lines and | 5 |
of all our | 5 |
importance to the | 5 |
nor can we | 5 |
the same in | 5 |
with which it | 5 |
every form of | 5 |
languages which have | 5 |
which we shall | 5 |
the sum of | 5 |
in the direction | 5 |
would you say | 5 |
of our times | 5 |
of the drift | 5 |
distinguished from the | 5 |
nouns and pronouns | 5 |
as for the | 5 |
in reference to | 5 |
principle of correctness | 5 |
concepts of group | 5 |
of the particular | 5 |
the words which | 5 |
the one case | 5 |
the noun is | 5 |
the lack of | 5 |
that i may | 5 |
is either a | 5 |
the two other | 5 |
the process by | 5 |
conveyed by the | 5 |
can be shown | 5 |
to be taken | 5 |
the loss of | 5 |
must remember that | 5 |
it is precisely | 5 |
drift of a | 5 |
of each of | 5 |
and to make | 5 |
felt to be | 5 |
one that is | 5 |
of groups i | 4 |
of the anglo | 4 |
are neither beautiful | 4 |
feature of the | 4 |
a great number | 4 |
the two terms | 4 |
not at all | 4 |
the words in | 4 |
of progress and | 4 |
now it is | 4 |
let it be | 4 |
we have had | 4 |
each language has | 4 |
that many of | 4 |
not of a | 4 |
which should be | 4 |
has for its | 4 |
another form of | 4 |
notes of the | 4 |
form of language | 4 |
the other is | 4 |
may give a | 4 |
do not see | 4 |
give us the | 4 |
which are neither | 4 |
and it would | 4 |
is the cause | 4 |
we shall do | 4 |
not be too | 4 |
in the pronunciation | 4 |
but the expression | 4 |
or does it | 4 |
to emerge from | 4 |
the functions of | 4 |
of motion and | 4 |
to us the | 4 |
not sufficient to | 4 |
a multiplicity of | 4 |
number of languages | 4 |
of a great | 4 |
does not constitute | 4 |
in a few | 4 |
burning in the | 4 |
we find ourselves | 4 |
their way into | 4 |
none of them | 4 |
entirely on the | 4 |
be drawn between | 4 |
of philosophy and | 4 |
the errors of | 4 |
to the thing | 4 |
a complex of | 4 |
essence of things | 4 |
an indian tongue | 4 |
method of artistic | 4 |
means of which | 4 |
and expression in | 4 |
the various forms | 4 |
other of the | 4 |
ought to have | 4 |
called from the | 4 |
the materials of | 4 |
the face of | 4 |
as we may | 4 |
the individual and | 4 |
is just as | 4 |
of these two | 4 |
by all means | 4 |
are used in | 4 |
and that it | 4 |
and verbs are | 4 |
may be taken | 4 |
are not merely | 4 |
to a given | 4 |
theoretic and practical | 4 |
a notion of | 4 |
contains in itself | 4 |
that natural beauty | 4 |
be referred to | 4 |
implied in the | 4 |
of the characteristics | 4 |
of the picture | 4 |
it is rather | 4 |
to the english | 4 |
of the theoretical | 4 |
pure and simple | 4 |
pleasure of art | 4 |
for the aesthetic | 4 |
he should not | 4 |
has been sometimes | 4 |
and grammatical elements | 4 |
of the city | 4 |
drift of language | 4 |
of a proposition | 4 |
inclined to believe | 4 |