quadgram

This is a table of type quadgram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

quadgram frequency
on the other hand115
at the same time102
to be found in68
one of the most58
in the case of52
for the most part47
is to be found45
is one of the42
it is to be40
in so far as38
a great deal of37
for the purpose of37
be found in the36
in the first place36
the fact that the35
is not to be35
at the end of34
it is difficult to34
the end of the33
for the sake of33
as well as the33
of the sixteenth century32
it is impossible to32
so far as it29
in the history of29
the beginning of the28
the influence of the28
it is not the27
the history of the27
of the fact that27
as one of the27
there can be no26
the author of the26
on the part of26
in the midst of26
that there is a25
a good deal of25
the unity of time25
the nature of the24
for the first time24
the greater part of24
may be said to23
on the one hand22
of the eighteenth century22
be said to have22
it is true that22
that it is not22
than that of the22
but it is not22
is by no means22
that it is a22
imitation of the classics21
the imitation of the21
in spite of his21
it would have been20
for a long time20
that it is the20
to the fact that20
the language of the20
at the beginning of19
and it is not19
in the course of19
it may be that19
seems to have been19
it may be said19
sense of the word19
the work of the19
from the quarterly review18
he seems to have18
of the unity of18
of one of the18
the part of the18
on the other side18
during the sixteenth century18
to say that the18
the mind of the18
it seems to me18
at the age of18
we do not know18
in the hands of18
i do not know18
in the way of18
the point of view18
the function of the17
on account of the17
a man of genius17
the way in which17
i do not mean17
as well as in17
it is clear that17
one of the greatest17
the spirit of the17
in the form of17
from time to time16
in the same way16
the writers of the16
the church of england16
of the middle ages16
does not seem to16
with the exception of16
was one of the16
the manner in which16
and it is the16
it is hard to16
that it would be16
at the bottom of16
of the italian renaissance15
it would not be15
on the ground that15
of the human mind15
in the language of15
are to be found15
that is to say15
the effect of the15
the character of the15
after the manner of15
a work of art15
in one of the15
ought not to be15
the theory of the15
a large number of15
from the edinburgh review15
by the fact that15
is said to have15
it must be admitted15
in order to be15
the case of the15
as that of the15
seems to me to15
as a matter of15
the way of all14
in the writings of14
point of view of14
under the name of14
the poetry of the14
as a result of14
but it is the14
the middle of the14
as if it were14
in the fact that14
in the world of14
so far as the14
and this is the14
the other side of14
in spite of the14
that there was a14
the genius of the14
to do with the14
it is easy to14
way of all flesh14
it is not a14
to have been the13
we have no doubt13
the theory of poetry13
as far as they13
on the side of13
to be able to13
the close of the13
the end of his13
the rest of the13
it is said that13
do not believe that13
i do not think13
to account for the13
a few of the13
in the habit of13
of which it is13
in the sixteenth century13
it would be a13
in which it is13
may be found in13
the name of the13
in the mind of13
was the first to13
as well as of13
one and the same13
there is no reason13
of the nineteenth century13
to me to be13
in the house of13
the fact that he13
other side of the13
in the eyes of12
so far from being12
at the expense of12
it is not easy12
vauquelin de la fresnaye12
of the present day12
as far as we12
at the head of12
in order to make12
as far as the12
which is to be12
for the benefit of12
of time and place12
from the fact that12
in the character of12
the idea of the12
it is a very12
the side of the12
the quality of the12
in the united states12
it has been said12
the unity of place12
through the medium of12
of those who have12
it is in the12
as we have seen12
of the seventeenth century12
is not easy to12
the present state of12
the commencement of the12
to be regarded as12
there has been a12
that it was a12
and at the same12
it is not an12
that he did not12
if we are to12
as well as to12
the works of the12
of the church of11
the author of a11
the use of the11
as if they were11
and i do not11
to say that he11
as a kind of11
and there is a11
it seems to us11
is at once the11
is not so much11
of the existence of11
so far as he11
in the use of11
not to be found11
the aim of the11
from the point of11
in the nature of11
what may be called11
in the work of11
it seems to be11
in the presence of11
the man in the11
that most of the11
in one of his11
it is doubtful whether11
and it is this11
different from that of11
for the purposes of11
the fact that it11
to that of the11
as will be seen11
in the direction of11
of the present age11
it is not that11
in regard to the11
unities of time and10
the form of a10
in the mean time10
in the middle of10
this is not the10
far as they are10
the literary criticism of10
is an imitation of10
essay of dramatic poesy10
the unities of time10
of the greatest of10
go to the theatre10
with which they are10
that we do not10
the language of prose10
they ought to be10
in a high degree10
a study of the10
far as we can10
with regard to the10
in the days of10
the authority of the10
as a sort of10
it is necessary to10
is said to be10
in consequence of the10
by the side of10
on the theory of10
at a time when10
so much of the10
a few years later10
of men and women10
in the development of10
in the second place10
in keeping with the10
in the opinion of10
i am not sure10
to the influence of10
of the author of10
of a man who10
as well as a10
as far as it10
if it had been10
the circumstances of the10
in the minds of10
but it would be10
nothing to do with10
the work of a10
the head of the10
on the subject of10
that there is no10
from that of prose10
are not to be10
more than any other10
the beauty of the10
that he was a10
the existence of a10
of the human heart10
in which they are10
of which we have10
of poetry in the10
and that of the10
the defence of poesy10
under the influence of10
the publication of the10
as if he were10
theory of the drama10
there is no other10
and there is no10
and it may be10
it would seem that10
so far as to10
one of the great10
of the poet to10
the existence of the10
those who do not10
the question of the10
in the spirit of10
the truth is that10
the critics of the10
and that it is10
he would have been10
in the preface to10
in a state of10
theory of poetry in9
the words of the9
could not have been9
may be seen in9
the fact that his9
of the last century9
is the result of9
the very end of9
to the study of9
it is possible to9
as well as his9
to say nothing of9
mill on the floss9
the aid of the9
it may be doubted9
the growth of the9
to which we have9
in relation to the9
from the nature of9
it appears to us9
of a man of9
one of the many9
to the effect that9
the order of the9
but it was not9
he is not a9
would not have been9
as a work of9
of some of the9
low and rustic life9
of which he is9
this conception of the9
in the representation of9
are by no means9
the success of the9
that he does not9
in favour of the9
the meaning of the9
but it is a9
but it may be9
the best part of9
the conduct of the9
of the heroic drama9
there seems to be9
a certain number of9
the mill on the9
we do not think9
as we have already9
it is one of9
is a kind of9
may be called the9
can be said to9
the truth of the9
the art of the9
a matter of fact9
on the score of9
may be regarded as9
seem to have been9
literary criticism of the9
of a young man9
the attitude of the9
in the works of9
to the unity of9
it will be seen9
every now and then9
it may well be9
the unity of the9
in the life of9
the result of the9
it is not only9
for the greater part9
it is evident that9
appears to have been9
we do not believe9
a part of the9
the critical literature of9
and it is a9
the age of innocence9
at the close of9
the action of the9
a little while ago9
but there is a9
general theory of poetry9
the period of classicism9
in the defence of9
to some of the9
if he had been9
have been able to9
the members of the9
commentary on the poetics9
and the nature of9
will be found in9
and the influence of9
is due to the9
the study of the9
do not wish to8
that it does not8
the son of a8
is the function of8
not seem to be8
nine out of ten8
i do not say8
which we have already8
the taste of the8
the position of the8
the general theory of8
it ought to be8
with that of the8
and it would be8
of the poet is8
it might have been8
if he were to8
would have been a8
and not in the8
from the language of8
no other than the8
men and women who8
the function of poetry8
to the laws of8
if they had been8
the venus and adonis8
the attention of the8
of the art of8
that he is a8
at the time of8
am not sure that8
on the authority of8
the art of poetry8
that he should have8
and not of the8
throughout the period of8
be regarded as a8
a very large proportion8
it is the most8
influence of the italian8
a man who has8
in the face of8
may not have been8
in the preface of8
is not difficult to8
from the time of8
to be a good8
which it is the8
lives of the poets8
the authors of the8
than those of the8
the name of a8
in imitation of the8
in the light of8
that he was the8
the lives of the8
but there is no8
fact that it is8
is impossible not to8
to the end of8
it had not been8
it is merely a8
the eyes of the8
to a great extent8
is that of a8
if he had not8
the whole of the8
the sight of the8
of the new school8
to teach and delight8
in the name of8
as has been seen8
of all that is8
of the aristotelian canons8
too much of a8
use of the word8
if he had never8
it was in the8
to the point of8
is a good deal8
a poet of the8
it is impossible not8
because they are not8
the course of the8
with a sense of8
there is a great8
the last few years8
the council of trent8
to be judged by8
it is to the8
the midst of the8
to get rid of8
may well be that8
the poet does not8
a great part of8
the life of the8
greater part of the8
the first of these8
it is possible that8
we have not been8
a considerable number of8
if it had not8
over and over again8
that there may be8
of pity and fear8
in spite of all8
that he has been8
the secret of the8
as the author of8
to escape from the8
that he was not8
an account of the8
so much for the8
of the lyrical ballads8
there is a certain8
it is not difficult8
without the aid of8
represented on the stage8
which is at once8
there is no need8
for it is not8
by means of the8
in some of the8
of the historical method8
the critical activity of8
the sake of the8
there is no doubt8
the nature of a8
we may be sure8
is no reason why8
in the beginning of7
of the fifteenth century7
do not think that7
jean de la taille7
the doctrine of the7
the opinion of the7
what they do not7
to the genius of7
in the age of7
the development of the7
the literature of the7
in the infancy of7
if it is to7
will be found to7
of the truth of7
it will be remembered7
the face of the7
in the person of7
in the art of7
at the commencement of7
in which the author7
the test of poetry7
in the choice of7
the minds of the7
in the lives of7
there is something in7
the origin of the7
in which we are7
a man of the7
one of the first7
is not only a7
the sort of thing7
the character of a7
that he had been7
to the theory of7
to those who have7
on a first night7
is more or less7
to be one of7
that it was the7
the place of the7
discourse of english poetrie7
it is probable that7
the days of the7
the rest of his7
the introduction of the7
he points out that7
of the same kind7
to be in the7
that it will be7
out of the question7
it is as if7
they do not like7
had not been for7
and it must be7
that they are not7
during the last few7
in a less degree7
at the present day7
the influence of italian7
the eye of the7
but we do not7
the second book of7
the presence of the7
what we may call7
was by no means7
the hands of the7
imitation of human life7
seems to be the7
not in the least7
to prove that the7
as we have said7
the end of a7
so far as i7
the benefit of the7
of the human soul7
of which they are7
with a view to7
but at the same7
the importance of the7
the american short story7
the details of the7
that they do not7
one of the two7
the top of the7
in the conduct of7
there is a good7
have no doubt that7
the very nature of7
the fact that a7
of the english church7
to the eye of7
it is interesting to7
of it in the7
and on the other7
the nature of things7
i do not believe7
the power of the7
of the united states7
would be interesting to7
the men and women7
it is a curious7
rather than by the7
in the pursuit of7
in the mouth of7
so far as they7
in his own person7
of the french revolution7
for the reason that7
the characters of the7
it is by no7
though it may be7
so far as we7
of the critic to7
by the substitution of7
that he is not7
to see that the7
as those of the7
of the beauty of7
a few years ago7
it is a good7
it has often been7
a world in which7
in the same manner7
ought not to have7
but i do not7
of the theory of7
was not to be7
far as it is7
the last twenty years7
it is not to7
the consideration of the7
may be said that7
which there is no7
would have been the7
the formation of a7
the difference between the7
it would be difficult7
the soul of man7
as much as possible7
be one of the7
believe that it is7
it would be interesting7
if they were not7
a more or less7
more important than the7
very end of the7
of the influence of7
the fact that we7
a great number of7
as has already been7
it is not surprising7
a member of the7
the ideas of the7
i should like to7
in the manner of7
the form of the7
of that which is7
of the age of7
not only with the7
if it were a7
the same kind of7
to go to the7
that we have not7
to the conclusion that7
to suggest that the7
one of the few7
the mode in which7
it does not seem7
of the epic poem7
as a means of7
it will not be7
in which all the7
is not the case7
of the thoughts and7
at the feet of7
in the matter of7
the judgment of the7
it was not the7
it must be remembered7
he was a man7
it may have been7
of which he has7
as it was in7
of those who are6
as it is in6
rape of the lock6
the earlier part of6
with a kind of6
too much to say6
the highest form of6
will be seen that6
the pages of the6
on a level with6
less than that of6
the whole of his6
great deal of money6
only as far as6
for a short time6
of most of the6
that some of the6
is in keeping with6
in the long run6
which they have been6
the object of his6
very large proportion of6
what has been said6
do not say that6
with the question of6
the authority of aristotle6
i should not have6
it is impossible for6
the explanation of the6
in a short time6
in the first instance6
a knowledge of the6
what might be called6
in and for itself6
this is one of6
the third floor back6
in addition to the6
it is a great6
one of his own6
is only fair to6
of the highest kind6
that this is not6
critics of the renaissance6
the castle of st6
as much as the6
to the nature of6
in which he has6
is likely to be6
not been able to6
not a few of6
there was a time6
his conception of the6
the story of rimini6
one of those who6
but it does not6
that which is most6
the first time in6
manner in which the6
the merits of the6
it is like the6
in the interest of6
he is not to6
in the absence of6
as i have already6
of a great poet6
in the morning post6
the unity of action6
there has been no6
he knows that the6
with the aid of6
if we were to6
that has ever been6
is a man of6
not because they are6
to one of the6
since the days of6
the life of a6
as if he had6
is that of the6
have been written by6
the story of the6
it is as though6
in the study of6
the duty of the6
at the foot of6
of the laws of6
the same way as6
the same time a6
to the service of6
as though it were6
do not care to6
he is one of6
by one of the6
the value of the6
at the same moment6
fall of the curtain6
can be no doubt6
there is in the6
one may say that6
the beauty of a6
in spite of their6
the duration of the6
of the work of6
by a series of6
be no doubt that6
which it had been6
we are far from6
in any of the6
of the edinburgh review6
first half of the6
is to be feared6
and as a result6
where there is no6
on the nature of6
this point of view6
for a moment to6
of one of his6
from the practice of6
arte of english poesie6
the recognition of the6
do not propose to6
it is no less6
the cockney school of6
that it is possible6
are apt to be6
beyond the bounds of6
on the surface of6
essentially different from that6
of men in the6
the character of his6
in the position of6
it is not so6
the tale of the6
the whole life of6
from that of the6
said to have been6
the works of a6
of the power of6
the essence of poetry6
to the beauty of6
an imitation of life6
in comparison with the6
in the story of6
in the second book6
on the same subject6
do not mean to6
may be doubted whether6
that one of the6
in the death of6
would have thought that6
from the very first6
his point of view6
by no means the6
in accordance with the6
it is a mere6
the great writers of6
he was the first6
the necessity of the6
an art of imitation6
do not mean that6
of the human race6
history of literary criticism6
the idea of a6
as the result of6
all that can be6
the criticism of the6
to the rules of6
to which it is6
the doctrines of the6
it is only fair6
the conclusion of the6
the interest of the6
of a single hero6
the other is the6
so long as the6
with the power of6
the office of the6
in the one case6
of the genius of6
and it is to6
is no need to6
the law of association6
to think of the6
by a man of6
was a man of6
to deal with the6
the story of his6
in the same year6
that they should be6
on the one side6
the manners of the6
is much the same6
but he has not6
is the sort of6
as an imitation of6
yet it may be6
beyond the reach of6
it is not because6
in the centre of6
stage of english criticism6
the language of poetry6
it would be easy6
i do not doubt6
the best of the6
for there is no6
that the unity of6
new school of poetry6
be this as it6
if he is a6
of the most important6
but it is in6
as if i had6
he could not have6
he is a poet6
they are to be6
this as it may6
a defence of the6
is one of those6
the fact remains that6
of the drama is6
in the mill on6
the love of the6
but they are not6
may be considered as6
the direction of the6
much to say that6
of any of the6
man in the street6
to the truth of6
there is to be6
it was not until6
language of real life6
it is no longer6
we should not have6
which we have been6
that in the last6
we do not remember6
of the history of6
in the place of6
he had not been6
to be the first6
by the name of6
the mind of man6
the reign of charles6
his commentary on the6
on the first night6
but this does not6
there ought to be6
that he would have6
to the present day6
here and there a6
it must have been6
the house of commons6
in the shape of6
far as he is6
the hero of a6
be no other than6
to the heart of6
in most of the6
as the saying is6
the formation of the6
in the domain of6
one or two of6
there can be little6
by the force of6
sense of the term6
the first half of6
the first volume of6
of a series of6
the rules of aristotle6
the image of the6
an imitation of the6
the practice of the6
point of view is6
the fault of the6
was the result of6
for it is the6
the world of letters6
most of the great6
the imitation of nature6
would be easy to6
is the essence of6
is impossible to read6
in which i have6
as far as i6
than any of his6
be seen in the6
there is not a6
most of the critics6
this could not be6
is to be noted6
in the description of6
in a letter to6
the editor of the6
we find in the6
in his old age6
and the power of6
the style of the6
become a part of6
of nature and the6
in an age of6
might have been a6
is the kind of5
for its own sake5
the first and most5
in the seventeenth century5
be given to the5
do not know that5
of the kind that5
man of the world5
on the cockney school5
literary criticism in england5
in part to the5
at the court of5
to have written the5
the poet and the5
him in the same5
that it is no5
quarters of a century5
in order to render5
let us not be5
was not a great5
throughout the middle ages5
in the words of5
it is more than5
the volumes before us5
it could not be5
as it would be5
that he has not5
but he did not5
he was one of5
is capable of being5
of the function of5
to the time of5
of the italian critics5
of my literary life5
to be a man5
to us to be5
or it may be5
the people of england5
any one of the5
whole life of a5
as long as the5
of the french influence5
a more than usual5
be regarded as an5
of which we are5
and there can be5
of the poetic art5
of the fine arts5
of his own day5
it is not enough5
as we can judge5
is that it is5
specific symptoms of poetic5
about the beginning of5
the objects of the5
like that of a5
act of the will5
this is a very5
it would not have5
being at the same5
is based on the5
and some of the5
it is with the5
take the trouble to5
the matter of the5
revolution of the sun5
with the idea of5
reign of charles ii5
seems to have had5
during the middle ages5
it will be found5
on the art of5
the first of the5
the manner of the5
is not surprising that5
would be difficult to5
no one of these5
by any of the5
the basis of the5
and with it the5
the reader or hearer5
no such thing as5
but let us not5
of the writers of5
no man was ever5
of the origin of5
that he was an5
that there should be5
as a rule the5
to the charge of5
i will venture to5
which would have been5
which is the most5
it was natural that5
it is a bad5
that species of composition5
the sense of the5
in the world for5
i refer to the5
is to be regarded5
mr de la mare5
for poetry is the5
one of the best5
that it is more5
of two or three5
from the pen of5
they might have been5
but it is no5
in the attempt to5
it seems as if5
the names of the5
the master of the5
the most important of5
the good and the5
it is perhaps the5
which i have been5
the language of a5
been in the habit5
to tell the truth5
but on the whole5
have no hesitation in5
the dignity of the5
one or other of5
and the effect of5
that it should be5
in the cause of5
the religion of the5
greater part of his5
and all the other5
in the performance of5
they ought to have5
the vast majority of5
it is the first5
the fifteenth and sixteenth5
of the manner in5
introduction of the french5
said to be a5
a poem on the5
than that of a5
must be admitted that5
with respect to the5
the rules and precepts5
critical activity of the5
that the greater part5
is not a mere5
the ground that the5
a fragment of a5
but it is only5
the one and the5
for the expression of5
the rape of the5
by no means a5
of the reign of5
members of the audience5
has been said that5
in the field of5
as if it had5
it is very difficult5
every one of the5
to be met with5
be seen that the5
as it should be5
symptoms of poetic power5
the communication of pleasure5
there is much to5
and it is impossible5
such as it is5
but he could not5
in the time of5
the age of elizabeth5
literary criticism in france5
ought to be a5
to be written by5
the house of lords5
is not that of5
in the english language5
of time and space5
i did not know5
seems to us a5
the principles of the5
great part of the5
as i have said5
rules and precepts of5
the greatness of the5
is the work of5
the dignity of a5
that this is a5
he seems to be5
the hand of the5
by reason of the5
which he has been5
of the way in5
to that which is5
the progress of the5
tales of my landlord5
of the poetry of5
on account of their5
is easy to see5
the appearance of the5
the solution of the5
with which it is5
it does not follow5
is not likely to5
of the next century5
towards the close of5
it is only when5
of the imitation of5
that some of them5
the end of poetry5
been written by a5
the existence of which5
at the very moment5
we have only to5
it is not too5
second half of the5
in the early days5
to the efforts of5
far as i can5
no one has ever5
they seem to be5
that it may be5
there is a story5
most of all in5
with many actions of5
of the life of5
be said that the5
one has only to5
to the number of5
it may be asked5
is the fact that5
he is a man5
but even in the5
in which it was5
the class to which5
of the arts of5
as has been said5
of greek and latin5
it was at this5
it is so much5
i have endeavoured to5
of cause and effect5
in which he lived5
of the orlando furioso5
than in any other5
it is the same5
it is only the5
the mind of a5
but they do not5
attention of the reader5
the expression of the5
not one of them5
in the sense of5
is to be hoped5
mode of dealing with5
the triumph of the5
they are not in5
the poem on the5
and that it was5
to distinguish between the5
according to the rules5
in the same place5
to the cause of5
of the works of5
or at least a5
to the exercise of5
in the old days5
the fact is that5
little more than a5
the age in which5
on the way to5
the second part of5
the best of them5
the advantage of the5
which it would be5
but he does not5
the immediate object of5
of his own invention5
in his defence of5
in the power of5
of the things that5
of the three unities5
a great deal more5
is a form of5
it is not merely5
that he is the5
in the last resort5
to believe that the5
the time when the5
of the matter is5
that there is not5
all the forms of5
invented by the poet5
the beginning of his5
of which may be5
much in the same5
that there is nothing5
the subject of the5
the imagination and the5
criticism of this period5
side of the footlights5
theory of the epic5
the description of the5
cockney school of poetry5
the arts and sciences5
to be at the5
poets of the present5
neither more nor less5
of the most interesting5
well acquainted with the5
he would not have5
with a view of5
of the man in5
and the practice of5
the notion of the5
no less than the5
of the necessity of5
the critical ideas of5
it has been the5
the heroes and heroines5
we know not whether5
upon the fact that5
can be little doubt5
on the stage is5
and it is no5
but it is equally5
in any real sense5
not only by the5
of the most popular5
is not too much5
that it is impossible5
as if they had5
it is a little5
one or the other5
to believe that it5
and then it is5
if it is not5
aspect of the matter5
but this is not5
for those who have5
the means by which5
by an act of5
the effect of a5
as they ought to5
it is obvious that5
the work before us5
the second half of5
it is of a5
it is to this5
in france during the5
many actions of many5
but if it is5
in his commentary on5
out of keeping with5
of the present generation5
there are people who5
in a great measure5
the passing of the5
one of the chief5
toward the close of5
were it not for5
writers of the eighteenth5
all the works of5
i do not wish5
the author of this5
it is that which5
but because they are5
of the nature of5
the readers of the5
a good many of5
to which i have5
are for the most5
belong to the same5
in proportion to the5
to be the most5
it is permissible to5
in the company of5
that it was not5
an appeal to the5
passing of the third5
of the third floor5
a greater number of5
i confess that i5
the preface to the5
that i had been5
what is to be5
the sense in which5
to show that it5
it would be too5
half of the sixteenth5
the end of all5
between tragedy and comedy5
seems to be a5
criticism during the sixteenth5
years after his death5
we ought not to5
has been seen that5
the answer to the5
it would be impossible5
of a kind of5
on the stage in5
to the work of5
writers of the renaissance5
in his youth he5
after the death of5
the characters of tragedy5
due to the fact5
a place in the5
one and the other5
we know that there5
in the very first5
with the objects of5
in the pages of5
the part of a5
the front of the5
it is certain that5
so far at least5
we are told that5
are supposed to have5
earlier part of the5
fifteenth and sixteenth centuries5
do not think it5
the works of nature5
if there be any5
given to the world5
i appeal to the5
more nor less than5
not so good as5
a sense of the5
in this sense the5
will be seen later5
a man of letters5
the history of our5
at a loss to5
a vision of the5
of plautus and terence5
is clear that he5
held up to ridicule5
or any of the5
to the name of5
struggle for material prosperity5
the imitation of human5
it should be added5
that of a man5
some of the most5
has a right to5
may be permitted to5
and the man who5
he is said to5
the production of the5
it may be answered5
that this is the5
as might be expected5
it has been seen5
in point of fact5
the contents of the5
in answer to the5
of all human knowledge5
at the horse show5
the problem of the5
be a good poet5
the law of position5
in the fifteenth century5
the necessity of a5
though it were a5
life of a single5
the first is the5
must have been the5
at the risk of5
but it must be5
aristotle says that the5
would never have been5
is interesting to note5
to have been a5
the moral and intellectual5
the death of the5
to arrive at the5
the efforts of the5
he was not a5
to the imitation of5
the rights of man5
poetry is an imitation5
a young man of5
the result is that5
of his own time5
there is only one5
may be gathered from5
the language of real5
an echo to the5
of the poetical faculty5
it is of the5
what can be more5
have been willing to5
in the edinburgh review5
would be impossible to5
it is this that5
it was not that5
the essay on man5
not too much to5
is more significant than5
he would say that5
in the productions of5
with a degree of5
the poetics of aristotle5
of many of the5
have not been able5
to the standard of5
and the life of5
which is in the5
within the range of5
into the mouth of5
does not follow that5
was at that time5
seems to us to5
the history of english5
it is needless to5
that they are the5
which it is difficult5
must be remembered that5
large proportion of the5
it is at once5
the ladies of the5
out of place in5
the history of a5
there is so much5
in which they were5
by the laws of5
of aristotle and horace5
of the reading public5
as a form of4
as good as the4
the case of a4
that there are no4
and those of the4
at the sight of4
in matters of art4
the same class of4
the mirror up to4
the root of the4
is a very different4
we do not see4
he will find the4
the same relation to4
at the thought of4
of the english stage4
sort of thing that4
know that there is4
the scope of the4
of the most beautiful4
hand in hand with4
not that of a4
nature of the thoughts4
far from being a4
parts of the house4
the end of each4
to all the world4
and the writer of4
may be observed that4
his definition of tragedy4
idylls of the king4
found in the fact4
in the act of4
to the use of4
best part of a4
the people in the4
be expected from the4
to be ashamed of4
the novel and the4
the ordinary language of4
at all for the4
by the authority of4
the grounds of my4
a certain class of4
as distinguished from the4
to the general reader4
so as not to4
the ring and the4
what it was to4
that he has written4
it is amusing to4
of the greek poets4
that in this respect4
we are disposed to4
and circumstances of the4
those who have read4
the purposes of poetry4
which used to be4
the feet of the4
the action of tragedy4
of the world are4
there is always a4
discourse on the romanzi4
has been called the4
and the sense of4
the laws of the4
to say that they4
the history of literature4
the fate of the4
in the construction of4
the observance of the4
is an art of4
been a man of4
in the eighteenth century4
and the fragrancy of4
of literary criticism in4
the worse for being4
to the mass of4
it is only in4
the introduction of classical4
the blossom and the4
edition of the poetics4
there is too much4
that in spite of4
but the truth is4
there will be a4
it is designed to4
not so much the4
that not only the4
as to be a4
a master of the4
of the paradise lost4
single revolution of the4
can be found in4
of the theatre is4
so long as it4
not to have been4
critical literature of italy4
manner in which it4
as he is a4
to one who has4
though it is not4
the defenders of the4
as well as he4
and over again in4
it is part of4
for there is a4
is an act of4
and the progress of4
the pleasure of a4
the fairy queen proserpina4
a large proportion of4
for such a man4
this is the more4
at all to the4
in a book of4
to be expected from4
the most popular of4
even of the most4
in the neighbourhood of4
in the strictest sense4
present state of the4
be written in prose4
to regard it as4
not seem to know4
of greece and rome4
it is not always4
conception of the poet4
distinguishes tragedy from comedy4
much to be said4
was to be expected4
a hundred years ago4
three or four of4
is not that he4
there is no danger4
it may be called4
is not because i4
the substitution of the4
but if it be4
if there were no4
in the world to4
of our short story4
the most part the4
the exercise of his4
may say that the4
the pictures of the4
and we cannot but4
a vast number of4
history of english literature4
i could not see4
of which i have4
a large portion of4
of the greek and4
and the necessity of4
seem to have no4
work of the greatest4
in a series of4
the growth of classicism4
are not in the4
to be no other4
by virtue of the4
of the dramatis personae4
is much to be4
an interest in the4
the law of the4
imitation of classical literature4
is the spirit of4
be more or less4
and i should not4
in many of the4
be regarded as the4
all that relates to4
in the first volume4
because it is the4
that has yet been4
to such a man4
he is going to4
there are moments when4
that there are many4
of more or less4
it is easier to4
it is better to4
it is in keeping4
an imitation of human4
the interests of truth4
which he had not4
of the metaphysical poets4
the poet is to4
the thanksgiving story is4
as a proof of4
it has always been4
may be compared with4
he does not wish4
that there is any4
the use of words4
a reaction against the4
man was ever yet4
and some of them4
the nature of poetry4
that in the case4
when he wrote the4
more than a century4
to such a mind4
as it is with4
be a man of4
are not likely to4
have been one of4
the course of his4
have no difficulty in4
the accademia della crusca4
it is the duty4
it is not in4
the bottom of the4
in the present age4
as the language of4
one point of view4
of the battle of4
order in which they4
i have never seen4
the literary and political4
actions of many men4
no less than as4
so much as a4
what the public wants4
just because it is4
in order to draw4
by the representation of4
does not belong to4
if not the only4
except so far as4
in the excitement of4
regard it as a4
of the critics of4
be distinguished from the4
can hardly be denied4
in a certain sense4
the exception of the4
spirit of the years4
he is in a4
the function of tragedy4
by the light of4
was ever yet a4
are encoded as plain4
that a man should4
let me be permitted4
the founder of a4
cannot help thinking that4
as it is the4
of men of genius4
seems to me that4
in the prologue to4
the same time the4
on the stage to4
supposed to have been4
because it is too4
if i were to4
edinburgh and the quarterly4
the early nineteenth century4
matter is one of4
might have been better4
of the great poets4
just as it is4
as we shall see4
one of the things4
the man of genius4
the wish to be4
out of sight of4
not one of the4
in the number of4
more likely to be4
be gathered from the4
many actions of one4
at least of the4
nothing could be more4
in a sort of4
the exigencies of the4
in the composition of4
there is such a4
and the works of4
a fair number of4
in which a man4
the romance of the4
in what points i4
if he does not4
interesting to note that4
but in order to4
of the roman empire4
the matter is one4
the world is a4
that we are to4
the result of a4
it is a pity4
in the execution of4
is the most excellent4
and most of the4
a history of the4
the fragrancy of all4
the italians of the4
in consequence of a4
at the height of4
is the test of4
the property of the4
the whole system of4
in the process of4
that he has no4
a new form of4
we are informed that4
the difference of the4
the dramatic critic his4
as an example of4
a certain portion of4
of a work of4
was an age of4
for the rest of4
the measure of the4
with an air of4
one might almost say4
of course there are4
there will be no4
the transition from the4
a good deal more4
to the will of4
and this is a4
the extinction of the4
which the author has4
the fault is in4
the case of mr4
is the power of4
to tell a story4
blossom and the fragrancy4
be represented on the4
published at paris in4
of the individual poet4
as well as more4
the style in which4
is at one with4
as a test of4
aim of the poet4
as we know it4
far as we have4
to be understood as4
work of the poet4
the people on the4
would have been more4
not easy to conceive4
by the council of4
and the short story4
on the death of4
it must be one4
that the influence of4
lies in the fact4
may venture to say4
to go back to4
no reason to be4
is apt to be4
may be defined as4
it came to the4
have little or no4
of vices and virtues4
to the second edition4
to the credit of4
the grandeur of the4
been a good deal4
is the blossom and4
middle of the sixteenth4
of which the first4
and the intellectual energy4
by pointing out that4
to them in the4
poetry is the blossom4
is no doubt that4
to the countess of4
and the liberty of4
must it have been4
because they do not4
the novel of the4
to sum up the4
the memory of the4
more than a mere4
the banks of the4
in this respect is4
be found in a4
which is not to4
any one of them4
the second is the4
to the introduction of4
to us by the4
the second influx of4
as that of a4
it is but a4
were the first to4
of this or that4
i do not propose4
the merit of the4
in which we live4
a number of the4
have been in a4
of homer and virgil4
not sure that the4
he was a great4
and it is doubtful4
of the growth of4
is the poetry of4
with the love of4
because he is not4
we should have to4
of the highest and4
it be objected that4
we are bound to4
was the son of4
english criticism from ascham4
the idea that the4
that they will not4
the classic spirit in4
the average level of4
the best parts of4
a point at which4
in the first book4
there must be a4
of the same nature4
of the imagination and4
to listen to the4
that there can be4
higher than that of4
that i have been4
that the author of4
the man of letters4
by means of a4
in a kind of4
side by side with4
the head of a4
we are persuaded that4
the first is a4
and some of his4
in the application of4
to speak of a4
the secret of his4
with the progress of4
which are to be4
to find out what4
of his own soul4
so much the better4
the bounds of the4
it is equally true4
the poet must be4
the first book of4
he wrote in the4
of poetry and of4
on the basis of4
of language and of4
of the school of4
it was written in4
if i may be4
is as good as4
of the way of4
pleasure may be the4
on the face of4
is not the least4
by the example of4
as a description of4
he deals with the4
there is not the4
the sound of the4
nothing more than a4
for that very reason4
the vision and the4
and it will be4
aristotelian conception of the4
the sixteenth century the4
of the second volume4
to the doctrine of4
and as it were4
flux and reflux of4
that part of the4
the feelings of the4
to look at the4
in a spirit of4
nothing less than the4
since this was written4
iliad and the odyssey4
in this part of4
of pleasure may be4
in the first person4
it would be idle4
to be seen in4
the spirit of a4
that it had been4
from the spirit of4
a poet and a4
the image of a4
to the progress of4
it may be admitted4
in defence of the4
the founder of the4
the beauties of the4
it may be added4
me be permitted to4
the peace of the4
to the lyrical ballads4
was due to the4
can hardly be said4
and a great deal4
is difficult to say4
the very beginning of4
at least in the4
once or twice a4
any more than the4
yet a great poet4
to appear in the4
second book of the4
i had almost said4
the effect produced on4
of which he had4
if i were a4
we are to be4
mirror up to nature4
and yet it is4
is to be observed4
that a man who4
there are too many4
one of his letters4
or at least to4
words of the same4
at the cost of4
might have been the4
for the genius of4
must not be taken4
it may be observed4
of one of our4
the question whether the4
is shown by the4
it is at the4
he would be a4
which they could not4
the development of english4
from beginning to end4
in one and the4
to be no more4
character of a poet4
and the spirit of4
he will not be4
of which we cannot4
the employment of the4
for the suppression of4
they seem to have4
it is not at4
it is not for4
on the banks of4
is supposed to be4
not think it necessary4
the appearance of truth4
should be allowed to4
of the reader to4
it is well that4
one would have thought4
all the laws of4
in the critical literature4
which belong to the4
of the most brilliant4
of what he is4
in the idea of4
it is on this4
an ideal of the4
with which he has4
the morning of the4
of shakespeare and milton4
he appears to have4
mind of the reader4
to be feared that4
it is on the4
in point of time4
on this side of4
is derived from the4
to the existence of4
through pity and fear4
already on the decline4
the definition of tragedy4
because it is not4
point of view was4
the actions of tragedy4
a defence of poetry4
in the short story4
man of his time4
of the heroic couplet4
in the plays of4
of the edinburgh and4
that the world had4
to some extent the4
more or less of4
is not enough to4
without being at the4
criticism from ascham to4
the freedom of the4
to most of the4
in the way in4
in the knowledge of4
as the representative of4
of that sort of4
the construction of the4
but one of the4
do not deny that4
there is the same4
of poetry for the4
of the supreme being4
the preface of his4
to think that the4
this will never do4
which we have spoken4
of the character of4
if we did not4
in his power to4
the children of the4
the case in the4
the greatest of the4
him as a man4
is to be done4
fragrancy of all human4
the latter part of4
are little more than4
and a man of4
a writer of the4
if it be said4
in the measure of4
like that of the4
the tone of the4
in the reign of4
is more likely to4
of the world of4
have nothing to do4
is the more remarkable4
so it is that4
we ought to be4
have more or less4
is an attempt to4
from ascham to milton4
in the solitude of4
the hamlet of mme4
of it to the4
ring and the book4
in the intervals of4
the result of such4
i have no doubt4
time a profound philosopher4
in a work of4
the bulk of the4
think it necessary to4
the iliad and the4
of the old school4
there is always the4
the greater number of4
we come to the4
the edinburgh and the4
this seems to me4
french criticism during the4
and every now and4
there is not one4
as well as those4
in the growth of4
do not know what4
and in such a4
we have no hesitation4
the state of the4
in each of them4
is the basis of4
if he is not4
but this was not4
during the period of4
it would be unjust4
of a crowd of4
and the ancient mariner4
the actions of men4
to the house of4
we do not pretend4
if he did not4
may be the immediate4
suggest that it is4
during the next century4
on the most dignified4
in the following words4
be considered as a4
the reaction against the4
poetry as an imitation4
of the horse show4
the worst of the4
the general public is4
the masters of the4
the laws of that4
criticism in the sixteenth4
to the task of4
is the office of4
a young man who4
essential difference between the4
is confined to the4
but as soon as4
the moral nature of4
importance of being earnest4
this was not the4
ought to be the4
of the english language4
when we come to4
in the highest and4
of the critics who4
it is curious to4
of a person who4
the truth of nature4
the merit of his4
in the best of4
within the bounds of4
and that they are4
another point of view4
a book on the4
that poetry is not4
the hand of a4
is doubtful whether the4
the poetry of mr4
that we have been4
the aristotelian conception of4
an infinite variety of4
from those of the4
no doubt that he4
of classical metres in4
there would be no4
to get out of4
far as it goes4
up and down the4
way in which he4
this side of the4
that the language of4
in the court of4
the nature of man4
his work as a4
ronsard and du bellay4
the eyes of a4
the distinction between the4
it does not matter4
of the sort of4
it was an age4
of the imagination or4
the following passage from4
the things that are4
to him as a4
do not hesitate to4
those to whom the4
objects of the senses4
author of the quintil4
is at least as4
by which it is4
is divided into two4
language of the imagination4
of genius is the4
of difference between the4
the object of the4
presented on the stage4
that it is in4
an act of the4
as it has been4
which is not so4
that he had no4
even though it be4
the art of writing4
in common with his4
that we are not4
he ought to be4
for it is a4
might have been expected4
of poetry as a4
without reference to the4
is not one of4
to speak of the4
and yet i have4
is the expression of4
function of the poet4
it must be owned4
the mouth of the4
it is the work4
tragedy from comedy in4
even to the most4
in his preface to4
of the same class4
in the middle ages4
ever yet a great4
men and women are4
all the members of4
of the great italian4
at the present moment4
as far as is4
there is not an4
had the courage to4
that there is one4
the subject of poetry4
at once the most4
the struggle for material4
to save it from4
and there was a4
the church of rome4
the importance of being4
as a man of4
the former in the4
the fact that there4
whatever may be the4
it is the function4
that can be said4
the men of the4
that we should have4
it used to be4
to the praise of4
the wings of the4
and the art of4
introduce classical metres into4
and the love of4
there is no evidence4
the abuse of poetry4
it is this which4
the pleasure of the4
france during the sixteenth4
the mother of lies4
as in the case4
the tyranny of the4
in the existence of4
in the french renaissance4
they do not understand4
seems to be no4
to be such a4
and it is of4
in the georgian book4
is not an essential4
the minds of men4
have been accustomed to4
the first dawn of4
of the man who4
the edge of the4
the structure of the4
but it is more4
dearth of great actresses4
is a matter of4
have been led to4
i have seen it4
it may be the4
less than in the4
the most dignified plane4
is the man who4
the child of the4
the most interesting of4
to do more than4
he might have been4
or the other of4
and it was not4
in jean de la4
by the spectacle of4
as a protest against4
what he sees in4
in the present state4
to a degree that4
of keeping with the4
of light and shade4
the edinburgh and quarterly4
are said to have4
the property of exciting4
in the present case4
is the nature of4
the same manner as4
that the history of4
in sympathy with the4
them out of the4
it has been suggested4
in the venus and4
the results of his4
have the air of4
we should not be4
under the burden of4
as soon as they4
it is a mistake4
as far as his4
the skill with which4
at the top of4
the life of his4
of the book is4
said to be the4
says that it is4
the course of time4
do not pretend to4
his defence of the4
in the sense in4
me to be a4
says that the unity4
little to do with4
of the quality of4
the rules of the4
that poetry is the4
the battle of the4
the wife of a4
the air of a4
it can only be4
is that he is4
in favor of the4
statements of fact in4
against the charge of4
the poet is not4
there was a great4
seem to think that4
but there is another4
to a degree which4
in the present day4
quite as much as4
it belongs to the4
to the best of4
of genius in the4
is based on a4
no hesitation in saying4
over half a century4
is characteristic of the4
is no reason to4
of the round table4
the production of a4
to be distinguished from4
until the very end4
it need not be4
is the quality of4
was meant to be4
statement of the unity4