Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
151	By thy long grey beard and glittering eye, Now wherefore stopp''st thou me? 151 Is it he?"
151	Say quick,quoth he,"I bid thee say-- What manner of man art thou?"
151	And is that Woman all her crew?
151	Are those her ribs through which the Sun Did peer, as through a grate?
151	But why drives on that ship so fast, Without or wave or wind?
151	From the fiends, that plague thee thus!-- Why look''st thou so?"
151	Is DEATH that woman''s mate?
151	Is that a DEATH?
151	Is this the hill?
151	What is the OCEAN doing?
151	Where are those lights so many and fair, That signal made but now?"
151	and are there two?
151	is this indeed The light- house top I see?
151	is this the kirk?
151	quoth one,"Is this the man?
151	speak again, Thy soft response renewing-- What makes that ship drive on so fast?
11101	And will your mother pity me, Who am a maiden most forlorn? 11101 By thy long grey beard and glittering eye, Now wherefore stopp''st thou me?
11101	Sleep you, sweet lady Christabel? 11101 ''But why drives on that ship so fast? 11101 ''Is it he?'' 11101 10 With lips unbrightened, wreathless brow, I stroll: And would you learn the spells that drowse my soul? 11101 30 What strange disguise hast now put on, To_ make believe_, that thou art gone? 11101 465 Is this the hill? 11101 575''Say quick,''quoth he,''I bid thee say-- What manner of man art thou?'' 11101 620 Why is thy cheek so wan and wild, Sir Leoline? 11101 75 Said Christabel,How camest thou here?"
11101	And are those two all, all the crew, That woman and her fleshless Pheere?
11101	And is that Woman all her crew?
11101	And what can ail the mastiff bitch?
11101	And what does your worship know about farming?"
11101	And wouldst thou wrong thy only child, Her child and thine?
11101	Are these thy boasts, Champion of human kind?
11101	Are those her ribs through which the Sun 185 Did peer, as through a grate?
11101	Are those her sails that glance in the Sun, Like restless gossameres?
11101	But who shall tell us all the kinds of them?
11101	Can she the bodiless dead espy?
11101	Can this be she, The lady, who knelt at the old oak tree?
11101	For can it be a ship that comes onward without wind or tide?]
11101	From the fiends, that plague thee thus!-- 80 Why look''st thou so?"
11101	III My genial spirits fail; And what can these avail 40 To lift the smothering weight from off my breast?
11101	Instead of this stanza the first edition had these two:"Are those_ her_ naked ribs, which fleck''d The sun that did behind them peer?
11101	Is Death that woman''s mate?
11101	Is that a Death?
11101	Is the night chilly and dark?
11101	Is this mine own countree?
11101	Lamb wrote from London in January:"Is it a farm that you have got?
11101	Perhaps it is the owlet''s scritch: For what can ail the mastiff bitch?
11101	Quid agunt?
11101	Said Christabel,"And who art thou?"
11101	Sed horum omnium familiam quis nobis enarrabit?
11101	The lovely lady, Christabel, Whom her father loves so well, What makes her in the wood so late, 25 A furlong from the castle gate?
11101	The night is chill; the forest bare; Is it the wind that moaneth bleak?
11101	The spirit who bideth by himself In the land of mist and snow, He loved the bird that loved the man Who shot him with his bow?''
11101	What if her guardian spirit''twere, What if she knew her mother near?
11101	What is the ocean doing?''
11101	What sees she there?
11101	What tell''st thou now about?
11101	Where are those lights, so many and fair, 525 That signal made but now?''
11101	Why stares she with unsettled eye?
11101	With new surprise,"What ails then my beloved child?"
11101	Without or wave or wind?''
11101	_ Ere_ I was old?
11101	and are there two?
11101	dost thou loiter here?
11101	et gradus et cognationes et discrimina et singulorum munera?
11101	is this indeed The light- house top I see?
11101	is this the kirk?
11101	quae loca habitant?
11101	quoth one,''Is this the man?
11101	speak again, 410 Thy soft response renewing-- What makes that ship drive on so fast?
11101	such sights to see?)
11101	the ranks and relationships, the peculiar qualities and gifts of each?
11101	what ails poor Geraldine?
11101	what they do?
11101	where they dwell?
9622	And must we then part from a dwelling so fair?
9622	And tell me, had you rather be,I said and held him by the arm,"At Kilve''s smooth shore by the green sea,"Or here at Liswyn farm?"
9622	And what''s the creeping breeze that comesThe little pond to stir?"
9622	And what''s the hill of moss to her? 9622 And where are they, I pray you tell?"
9622	But what''s the thorn? 9622 But wherefore to the mountain- top"Can this unhappy woman go,"Whatever star is in the skies,"Whatever wind may blow?"
9622	But why drives on that ship so fastWithouten wave or wind?"
9622	From the fiends that plague thee thus--Why look''st thou so?"
9622	How many are you then,said I,"If they two are in Heaven?"
9622	How many? 9622 I''m here, what is''t you want with me?"
9622	My little boy, which like you more,I said and took him by the arm--"Our home by Kilve''s delightful shore,"Or here at Liswyn farm?"
9622	Now wherefore thus, by day and night,In rain, in tempest, and in snow,"Thus to the dreary mountain- top"Does this poor woman go?
9622	Sisters and brothers, little maid,How many may you be?"
9622	Think you, mid all this mighty sumOf things for ever speaking,"That nothing of itself will come,"But we must still be seeking?"
9622	What can I do?
9622	What is the Ocean doing?
9622	Where are those lights so many and fairThat signal made but now?
9622	Where are your books? 9622 Why William, on that old grey stone,"Thus for the length of half a day,"Why William, sit you thus alone,"And dream your time away?
9622	You say that two at Conway dwell,And two are gone to sea,"Yet you are seven; I pray you tell"Sweet Maid, how this may be?"
9622	''Tis a sweet tale: Such as would lull a listening child to sleep, His rosy face besoiled with unwiped tears.-- And what became of him?
9622	--Where art thou gone my own dear child?
9622	--Why bustle thus about your door, What means this bustle, Betty Foy?
9622	A melancholy Bird?
9622	A simple child, dear brother Jim, That lightly draws its breath, And feels its life in every limb, What should it know of death?
9622	And Betty sees the pony too: Why stand you thus Good Betty Foy?
9622	And Betty''s drooping at the heart, That happy time all past and gone,"How can it be he is so late?
9622	And are these two all, all the crew, That woman and her fleshless Pheere?
9622	And can ye thus unfriended leave me?
9622	And why on horseback have you set Him whom you love, your idiot boy?
9622	Are these_ her_ naked ribs, which fleck''d The sun that did behind them peer?
9622	Are those_ her_ Sails that glance in the Sun Like restless gossameres?
9622	At this, my boy, so fair and slim, Hung down his head, nor made reply; And five times did I say to him,"Why?
9622	Can I forget what charms did once adorn My garden, stored with pease, and mint, and thyme, And rose and lilly for the sabbath morn?
9622	Can no one hear?
9622	Edward, tell me why?"
9622	For ever left alone am I, Then wherefore should I fear to die?
9622	I follow''d him, and said,"My friend"What ails you?
9622	If I these thoughts may not prevent, If such be of my creed the plan, Have I not reason to lament What man has made of man?
9622	Is this mine own countrà © e?
9622	Is this the Hill?
9622	Is this the Kirk?
9622	Is this the only cure?
9622	It is an ancyent Marinere, And he stoppeth one of three:"By thy long grey beard and thy glittering eye"Now wherefore stoppest me?
9622	Merciful God?
9622	My beauty, little child, is flown; But thou wilt live with me in love, And what if my poor cheek be brown?
9622	Now, when the frost was past enduring, And made her poor old bones to ache, Could any thing be more alluring, Than an old hedge to Goody Blake?
9622	The Hermit cross''d his brow--"Say quick,"quoth he,"I bid thee say"What manner man art thou?"
9622	The pony, Betty, and her boy, Wind slowly through the woody dale: And who is she, be- times abroad, That hobbles up the steep rough road?
9622	This is the process of our love and wisdom, To each poor brother who offends against us-- Most innocent, perhaps-- and what if guilty?
9622	This scrap of land he from the heath Enclosed when he was stronger; But what avails the land to them, Which they can till no longer?
9622	What could I do, unaided and unblest?
9622	What is''t that ails young Harry Gill?
9622	What wicked looks are those I see?
9622	Where is she, where is Betty Foy?
9622	Who is it, but old Susan Gale?
9622	Who would not cherish dreams so sweet, Though grief and pain may come to- morrow?
9622	Why are you in this mighty fret?
9622	Why of your further aid bereave me?
9622	Why will ye thus my suit repel?
9622	You know that huge round beam Which props the hanging wall of the old chapel?
9622	Young Harry was a lusty drover, And who so stout of limb as he?
9622	and what''s the pond?
9622	is this indeed The light- house top I see?
9622	is this kind?
9622	my friend, and clear your looks, Why all this toil and trouble?
9622	quoth one,"Is this the man?
9622	says Betty, going,"What can I do to ease your pain?
9622	should I know of him?"
9622	speak again,"Thy soft response renewing--"What makes that ship drive on so fast?
9622	tell me why"Does she repeat that doleful cry?"
9622	what has he to do With stirrup, saddle, or with rein?
9622	what is become of him?
9622	what is become of them?
9622	what saw I there?
9622	what will betide?
9622	what''s the matter?
9622	what''s the matter?
9622	where''s my Johnny?"
9622	wherefore weep you so?"
9622	wherefore?
8210	, find it convenient, to be the purchaser? 8210 God is everywhere,"I have exclaimed, and works everywhere, and where is there room for death?
8210	Why did you not give it me?
8210	** Believe me, dear Poole, your affectionate and mindful-- friend, shall I so soon have to say?
8210	*** Is not March rather a perilous month for the voyage from Yarmouth to Hamburg?
8210	*** Is there an emigrant at Keswick, who may make me talk and write French?
8210	*** What then remains?
8210	---------"I read the"Star"and another paper: what could I want with this paper, which is nothing more?"
8210	--in other words,"Is thinking possible without arbitrary signs?
8210	And, lastly, to whom would you advise me to apply?
8210	Are you not laying out a scheme which will throw your travelling in Italy, into an unpleasant and unwholesome part of the year?
8210	Are your galvanic discoveries important?
8210	Besides, are we not all in this present hour, fainting beneath the duty of Hope?
8210	Besides, is it not somewhat improbable that Talleyrand should have preferred prose to rhyme, when the latter alone''has got the chink''?
8210	But who her evening hours could cheer?
8210	But why do I calumniate my own spirit by saying I would rather?
8210	Can you give me a general notion what terms I have a right to insist on in either case?
8210	Did Carlisle[1] ever communicate to you, or has he in any way published his facts concerning"pain", which he mentioned when we were with him?
8210	Did there appear to you any remote analogy between the case I translated from the German Magazine and the effects produced by your gas?
8210	Did you get my attempt at a tragedy from Mrs. Robinson?
8210	Do you know aught about it?
8210	Does not that man''mock''God who daily prays against temptations, yet daily places himself in the midst of the most formidable?
8210	For God''s sake, my dear fellow, tell me what we are to gain by taking a Welsh farm?
8210	Hartley sends a grin to you?
8210	Have I estimated my own performances rightly?
8210	Have you ever thought of trying large doses of opium, a hot climate, keeping your body open by grapes, and the fruits of the climate?
8210	Have you heard from him lately?
8210	Have you read over Dr. Lardner on the Logos?
8210	Have you seen Mrs. Robinson[ 2] lately-- how is she?
8210	Have you seen T. Wedgwood since his return?
8210	Have you seen the second volume of the''Lyrical Ballads'', and the preface prefixed to the first?
8210	Her long and solitary evening hours?-- Talk her, or haply sing her, to her sleep?
8210	How much money will be necessary for"furnishing"so large a house?
8210	How much necessary for the maintenance of so large a family-- eighteen people-- for a year at least?]
8210	I can think of no other person( for your travelling companion)--what wonder?
8210	I fear that it may extend to seven hundred pages; and would it be better to publish the Introduction of History separately, either after or before?
8210	If I go into Scotland, shall I engage Walter Scott to write the history of Scottish poets?
8210	If any place in the southern climates were in a state of real quiet, and likely to continue so, should you feel no inclination to migrate?
8210	If the former, would you advise me to sell the copyright at once, or only one or more editions?
8210	In short, should I be right in advising Longman to undertake it?
8210	In what line of Life could I be more''actively''employed?
8210	In your poem,[2]"impressive"is used for"impressible"or passive, is it not?
8210	Is it not possible to get 25 or 30 of the"Poems"ready by to- morrow, as Parsons, of Paternoster Row, has written to me pressingly about them?
8210	Is it quite clear that you and I were not meant for some better star, and dropped, by mistake, into this world of pounds, shillings, and pence?
8210	Is the march of the human race progressive, or in cycles?
8210	Is your Sister married?
8210	Is your dear Mother well?
8210	Lastly make Morning seem morning with a daughter''s welcome?
8210	My London friends?
8210	My dearest Poole, can you conveniently receive Lloyd and me in the course of a week?
8210	My friend, T. Poole, begs me to ask what, in your opinion, are the parts or properties in the oak which tan skins?
8210	Now will you undertake this?
8210	Or shall I laugh, and teach him to insult the feelings of his fellow men?
8210	Ought children to be permitted to read romances, and stories of giants, magicians, and genii?
8210	Pray did you ever pay any particular attention to the first time of your little ones smiling and laughing?
8210	Read to her?
8210	Said he,"Why----[ 3] what letter is this for me?
8210	Shall I add my Tragedy, and so make a second volume?
8210	Shall I be grave myself, and tell a lie to him?
8210	Shall I not be an Agriculturist, an Husband, a Father, and a''Priest''after the order of''Peace''?
8210	Smooth her pillow?
8210	The snatching at fire, and the circumstance of my first words expressing hatred to professional men-- are they at all ominous?
8210	Then I say, shall I suffer him to see grave countenances and hear grave accents, while his face is sprinkled?
8210	This I"know"to be fact; and does the spirit of meekness forbid us to tell the truth?
8210	To whom shall a young man utter"his pride", if not to a young man whom he loves?
8210	What did you think of that case I translated for you from the German?
8210	What do they lead to?
8210	What does all this mean?
8210	What good can possibly come of your plan?
8210	What harm can a proposal do?
8210	What have I done in Germany?
8210	What think you of the stings of bees?
8210	Whether such a farm with so very large a house is to be procured without launching our frail and unpiloted bark on a rough sea of anxieties?
8210	Why is he not in England?
8210	Why we a''nt at"church"now, are we?
8210	Would an eulogist of medical men be inconsistent, if he should write against vendors of( what he deemed) poisons?
8210	Would you think him an honest man?
8210	Yet in whose poems, except those of Bowles, would it not have been excellent?
8210	You ask me,"Why, in the name of goodness, I did not return when I saw the state of the weather?"
8210	You know your old Poems are a third time in the press; why not set forth a second volume?
8210	[ 1]"What, and not to Fanny?"
8210	[ 2] What tie have I to England?
8210	[ Footnote 1: To this letter Mr. Lloyd seems to have returned the question, How could Coleridge live without companions?
8210	an''hireless''Priest?
8210	and is cold water a complete menstruum for these parts or properties?
8210	and what titles, that are dear and venerable, are there which I shall not possess, God permit my present resolutions to be realised?
8210	are not words, etc., parts and germinations of the plant, and what is the law of their growth?"
8210	either to print it and divide the profits, or( which indeed I should prefer) would you give me three guineas, for the copyright?
8210	for what have I left them?
8210	more insufferable reflectors of pain and weariness of spirit?
8210	on my account?
8210	or how far is the word arbitrary a misnomer?
8210	or how interrupt, or cast a shade on your good spirits, that were so rare, and so precious to you?
8210	or shall I pursue my first intention of inserting 1500 in the third edition?
8210	to write of Charles Lloyd with freedom?
8533	''Lear''Say, how is that?
8533	''Let not us,& c.?''
8533	''Tis a new one, No more on''t,& c. Seward reads:-- Are you become a patron too?
8533	''Turtle- footed''is a pretty word, a very pretty word: pray, what does it mean?
8533	And thane of Cawdor too: went it not so?
8533	And then, again, still unintroitive, addresses the Witches:-- I''the name of truth, Are ye fantastical, or that indeed Which outwardly ye show?
8533	And what are now the great problems of chemistry?
8533	And what to me, my love?
8533	And what was this life?
8533	Are you fair?
8533	Art thou_ Revenge?
8533	As kill a king?
8533	As the curtain drops, which do we pity the most?
8533	As to''twinn''d stones''--may it not be a bold_ catachresis_ for muscles, cockles, and other empty shells with hinges, which are truly twinned?
8533	Ay, and who but the reader of the play could think otherwise?
8533	Besides, does the word''denude''occur in any writer before, or of, Shakspeare''s age?
8533	Broughton?
8533	But did John, or Paul, or Martin Luther, ever flatter this barren belief with the name of saving faith?
8533	But did Jonson reflect that the very essence of a play, the very language in which it is written, is a fiction to which all the parts must conform?
8533	But if Shakspeare had made the diction truly dramatic, where would have been the contrast between Hamlet and the play in Hamlet?
8533	But is all this for your father?
8533	But where shall we class the Timon of Athens?
8533	But why is the 1, said to be placed below the 965?
8533	But, good lieutenant, is your general wiv''d?
8533	Can sick men play so nicely with their names?
8533	Charles''s speech:----For what concerns tillage, Who better can deliver it than Virgil In his Georgicks?
8533	Compare Regan''s-- What, did_ my father''s_ godson seek your life?
8533	Deliberateness?
8533	Dinant''s speech:-- Are you become a patron too?
8533	Do you mark that, my lord?
8533	Does not the Prince''s question rather show this?--''This Doll Tear- street should be some road?''
8533	Does''wolvish''or''woolvish''mean''made of wool?''
8533	Dr. Primrose, Is not this the same person as the physician mentioned by Mrs. Hutchinson in her Memoirs of her husband?
8533	Even in this the judgment and invention of the poet are very observable;--for what else could the willing tool of a Goneril be?
8533	Fled to England?
8533	For the rule of the metre once lost-- what was to restrain the actors from interpolation?
8533	For what purpose should the Vice leap upon the Devil''s back and belabour him, but to produce this separate attention?
8533	Had he not entered Rome as a conqueror?
8533	Had he not passed the Rubicon?
8533	Had this Seward neither ears nor fingers?
8533	Hamlet''s speech:-- Now might I do it, pat, now he is praying: And now I''ll do it:--And so he goes to heaven: And so am I revenged?
8533	He whom_ my father_ named?
8533	Hence this line should be read:-- What mean''st by that?
8533	How is it possible to feel the least interest in Albertus afterwards?
8533	How is it that the clouds still hang on you?
8533	How much did Brown allow for evaporation?
8533	How so?
8533	How understand we that--?
8533	How, too, could Brutus say that he found no personal cause-- none in Cæsar''s past conduct as a man?
8533	I suspect that Shakspeare wrote it transposed; Trust ye?
8533	Iago''s soliloquy: And what''s he then that says-- I play the villain?
8533	Iago''s speech:-- Virtue?
8533	If it means''wolfish,''what is the sense?
8533	In one sense, to be sure, pigeons and ring- doves could not dance but with''eclat''--''a claw?''
8533	In the name of love and wonder, do not four kisses make a double affirmative?
8533	In this sense, how can I love God, and not love myself, as far as it is of God?
8533	In what place does Shakspeare,--where does any other writer of the same age-- use''path''as a verb for''walk?''
8533	Is it a few letters of the alphabet, the hearing of which in a given succession, that saves?
8533	Is it a large ear- trumpet?--or rather a tube, such as passes from parlour to kitchen, instead of a bell?
8533	Is it possible that the author can have attentively studied the first two or three chapters of St. John''s gospel?
8533	It may be so; but who can doubt that it is a mistake for''my father''s child,''meaning herself?
8533	James Gurney, wilt thou give us leave awhile?
8533	King''s speech:-- And now, Laertes, what''s the news with you?
8533	Lear''s speech:-- Where have I been?
8533	May the true word be''a sable,''that is, a black fox, hunted for its precious fur?
8533	My life upon''t, young though thou art, thine eye Hath stay''d upon some favour that it loves; Hath it not, boy?
8533	My lord, you play''d once i''the university, you say?
8533	My lord?
8533	Nor wouldst thou take a blow?
8533	Nothing?
8533	Now how is this to be effected?
8533	O, where?
8533	Of what taste?
8533	Oppose this to Banquo''s simple surprise:-- What, can the devil speak true?
8533	Or''at- able,''--as we now say,--''she is come- at- able?''
8533	Philip?
8533	Read it thus:-- Do you think That I''ll have any of the wits to hang Upon me after I am married once?
8533	Rode he on Barbary?
8533	Scrivener''s speech:-- If there be never a_ servant- monster_ i''the Fair, who can help it, he says, nor a nest of antiques?
8533	Shakspeare''s meaning is--''lov''d you?
8533	Shall we rouse the night- owl in a catch, that will draw three souls out of one weaver?
8533	Shall we turn to the seed?
8533	Should he fail, To the brave issue of Germanicus; And they are three: too many( ha?)
8533	Should it not be''live''in the first line?
8533	Sir Gregory''s speech:----Do you think I''ll have any of the wits hang upon me after I am married once?
8533	Sir Roger''s speech:-- Did I for this consume my_ quarters_ in meditations, vows, and woo''d her in heroical epistles?
8533	Sirrah, what ail you?
8533	Something, or nothing?
8533	Speech of Ulysses:-- O, these encounterers, so glib of tongue, That give a_ coasting_ welcome ere it comes-- Should it be''accosting?''
8533	Still again Banquo goes on wondering like any common spectator: Were such things here as we do speak about?
8533	Sup any women with him?
8533	Take you me for a spunge, my lord?
8533	That Shakspeare meant to put an effect in the actor''s power in the very first words--"Who''s there?"
8533	The Count Rousillon:--know you such a one?
8533	The occasional interspersion of rhymes, and the more frequent winding up of a speech therewith-- what purpose was this designed to answer?
8533	Thou wouldst not willingly Live a protested coward, or be call''d one?
8533	To move wild laughter in the throat of death?
8533	Trust ye?
8533	Was she, or was she not, conscious of the fratricide?
8533	Were these problems solved, the results who dare limit?
8533	What can be conceived more unnatural and motiveless than this brutal resolve?
8533	What character did Shakspeare mean his Brutus to be?
8533	What counterfeit did I give you?
8533	What does''trunk''mean here and in the 1st scene of the 1st act?
8533	What else?
8533	What is the remedy?
8533	What is this?
8533	What kind of woman is''t?
8533	What meanest_ thou_ by that?
8533	What play of the ancients, with reference to their ideal, does not hold out more glaring absurdities than any in Shakspeare?
8533	What say you now?
8533	What shall I deduce from the preceding positions?
8533	What?
8533	Where is the Duke my father with his power?
8533	Where the proof of its logical possibility,--that is, that the word has any representable sense?
8533	Who is there?"
8533	Why do they no longer belong to the English, being once so popular?
8533	Why have the dramatists of the times of Elizabeth, James I. and the first Charles become almost obsolete, with the exception of Shakspeare?
8533	Why?
8533	Wilt thou lay hands on me, villain?
8533	Would Sir T. Brown, before weighing two pigs of lead, A. and B., pray to God that A. might weigh the heavier?
8533	Yet if the result of the dice be at the time equally believed to be a settled and predetermined effect, where lies the difference?
8533	almost tired i''your protectorship?
8533	and afterwards-- Is it a fashion in London, To marry a woman, and to never see her?
8533	and what to me?
8533	are we to have miracles in sport?--Or, I speak reverently, does God choose idiots by whom to convey divine truths to man?
8533	are you honest?
8533	for him To have a plot upon?
8533	or in Cesario after his conduct?
8533	or, Are you become a patron?
8533	overparted, overparted?
8533	what comfort have we now?
8533	which of you two imitated the other?"
8533	will she none?
8208	By thy long grey beard and glittering eye, Now wherefore stopp''st thou me? 8208 Is it he?"
8208	Say quick,quoth he,"I bid thee say What manner of man art thou?"
8208	What could be left to hope for when the man could already do such work?
8208	( Said Christabel,) And who art thou?
8208	-- What then?
8208	--"The dark?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	?
8208	? 1794.
8208	? 1794.
8208	? 1799.
8208	? 1799.
8208	? 1799.
8208	? 1799.
8208	? 1801.
8208	? 1805.
8208	? 1807.
8208	? 1807? 181O.
8208	? 1807? 181O.
8208	? 1811 THE VISIONARY HOPE Sad lot, to have no Hope!
8208	? 1815.
8208	? 1815.
8208	? 1818.
8208	? 1824.
8208	? 1825.
8208	? 1826.
8208	? 1826.
8208	? 182O.
8208	? 183O.
8208	? 183O.
8208	A melancholy bird?
8208	ANSWER TO A CHILD''S QUESTION Do you ask what the birds say?
8208	Ah why refuse the blameless bliss?
8208	Alone, by night, a little child, In place so silent and so wild- Has he no friend, no loving mother near?
8208	And art thou nothing?
8208	And how then was the Devil drest?
8208	And if her heart was not at ease, This was her constant cry--"It was a wicked woman''s curse-- God''s good, and what care I?"
8208	And if sometimes, why not to- day?
8208	And is that Woman all her crew?
8208	And is this all that you can do For him, who did so much for you?
8208	And what can ail the mastiff bitch?
8208	And who commanded( and the silence came), Here let the billows stiffen, and have rest?
8208	And will your mother pity me, Who am a maiden most forlorn?
8208	And wouldst thou wrong thy only child, Her child and thine?
8208	Are these thy boasts, Champion of human kind?
8208	Are those her ribs through which the Sun Did peer, as through a grate?
8208	Are those her sails that glance in the Sun, Like restless gossameres?
8208	Ask for her and she''ll be denied:-- What then?
8208	Boots it with spear and shield Against such gentle foes to take the field Whose beckoning hands the mild Caduceus wield?
8208	But ere she from the church- door stepped She smiled and told us why:"It was a wicked woman''s curse,"Quoth she,"and what care I?"
8208	But then one wakes, and where am I?
8208	But what is this?
8208	But who that beauteous Boy beguil''d, That beauteous Boy to linger here?
8208	Can danger lurk within a kiss?
8208	Can she the bodiless dead espy?
8208	Can this be she, The lady, who knelt at the old oak tree?
8208	Did ye not see her gleaming thro''the glade?
8208	FIRST VOICE"But why drives on that ship so fast, Without or wave or wind?"
8208	FRIEND This riddling tale, to what does it belong?
8208	Fadeless and young( and what if the latest birth of creation?)
8208	For can it be a ship that comes onward without wind or tide?
8208	From the fiends, that plague thee thus!-- Why look''st thou so?"
8208	Had Ellen lost her mirth?
8208	Hast thou a charm to stay the morning- star In his steep course?
8208	Hath he not always treasures, always friends, The good great man?
8208	How burst?
8208	How shall I yield you Due entertainment, Celestial quire?
8208	How shall we yield him honour due?
8208	How, Henry?
8208	How?
8208	I heard a groan and a peevish squall, And through the chink of a cottage- wall-- Can you guess what I saw there?
8208	III My genial spirits fail; And what can these avail To lift the smothering weight from off my breast?
8208	If the life was the question, a thing sent to try, And to live on be Yes; what can No be?
8208	Is Death that Woman''s mate?
8208	Is he sick?"
8208	Is it that he values it only as a medium, not as an art?
8208	Is that a Death?
8208	Is the night chilly and dark?
8208	Is this mine own countree?
8208	Is this the hill?
8208	Is''t history?
8208	Is''t no worse for the wear?
8208	My heart, Why beats it thus?
8208	NATURE''S ANSWER Is''t returned, as''twas sent?
8208	Or rather say at once, within what space Of time this wild disastrous change took place?
8208	Or throne of corses which his sword had slain?
8208	POET What think I now?
8208	Perhaps it is the owlet''s scritch: For what can ail the mastiff bitch?
8208	Place?
8208	Quid agunt?
8208	Return you me guilt, lethargy, despair?
8208	Said Christabel, How camest thou here?
8208	Sed horum omnium familiam quis nobis enarrabit?
8208	So off I flew: for how could I bear To see them gorge their dainty fare?
8208	Such griefs with such men well agree, But wherefore, wherefore fall on me?
8208	THE KNIGHT''S TOMB Where is the grave of Sir Arthur O''Kellyn?
8208	Tell me, on what holy ground May Domestic Peace be found?
8208	The little cloud- it floats away, Away it goes; away so soon?
8208	The lovely lady, Christabel, Whom her father loves so well, What makes her in the wood so late, A furlong from the castle gate?
8208	The night is chill; the forest bare; Is it the wind that moaneth bleak?
8208	The sun was sloping down the sky, And she had linger''d there all day, Counting moments, dreaming fears-- Oh wherefore can he stay?
8208	The twinkling stars?
8208	There was a hurry in her looks, Her struggles she redoubled:"It was a wicked woman''s curse, And why should I be troubled?"
8208	This, almost Coleridge''s loveliest fragment of verse, was composed in sleep, like"Kubla Khan,""Constancy to an Ideal Object,"and"Phantom or Fact?"
8208	Unceasing thunder and eternal foam?
8208	V Can wit of man a heavier grief reveal?
8208	What if her guardian spirit''twere, What if she knew her mother near?
8208	What is the ocean doing?"
8208	What sees she there?
8208	What strange disguise hast now put on, To_ make believe_, that thou art gone?
8208	What tell''st thou now about?
8208	What think you now?
8208	What though dread of threatened death And dungeon torture made thy hand and breath Inconstant to the truth within thy heart?
8208	What would''st thou have a good great man obtain?
8208	When thou to my true- love com''st Greet her from me kindly; When she asks thee how I fare?
8208	Where are those lights so many and fair, That signal made but now?"
8208	Who bade the sun Clothe you with rainbows?
8208	Who bade you do''t?
8208	Who fill''d thy countenance with rosy light?
8208	Who made thee parent of perpetual streams?
8208	Who made you glorious as the Gates of Heaven Beneath the keen full moon?
8208	Who sank thy sunless pillars deep in Earth?
8208	Why is thy cheek so wan and wild, Sir Leoline?
8208	Why rejoices Thy heart with hollow joy for hollow good?
8208	Why should I yearn To keep the relique?
8208	Why stares she with unsettled eye?
8208	With lips unbrightened, wreathless brow, I stroll: And would you learn the spells that drowse my soul?
8208	With new surprise,"What ails then my beloved child?"
8208	Yet what and whence thy gain, if thou withhold These costless shadows of thy shadowy self?
8208	Yet why at others''wanings should''st thou fret?
8208	You see that grave?
8208	_ Both._ Who bade you do''t?
8208	_ Both._ Who bade you do''t?
8208	_ Ere_ I was old?
8208	_ Slau._ Letters four do form his name- And who sent you?
8208	a gilded chain?
8208	and are there two?
8208	dost thou loiter here?
8208	et gradus et cognationes et discrimina et singulorum munera?
8208	is this indeed The light- house top I see?
8208	is this the kirk?
8208	not the dark?
8208	or an idle song?
8208	or aspiration?
8208	or resolve?)
8208	quoth one,"Is this the man?
8208	quà ¦ loca habitant?
8208	replied my gentle fair,"Beloved, what are names but air?
8208	salary?
8208	speak again, Thy soft response renewing-- What makes that ship drive on so fast?
8208	such sights to see?)
8208	that liv''st but in the brain?
8208	that single hill?
8208	the dark?
8208	titles?
8208	vision?
8208	what ails poor Geraldine?
8208	what power divine Shall henceforth wash the river Rhine?
8208	who sent you here?
8489	''What would''st thou with me?'' 8489 ''What would''st thou with me?''
8489	How so?
8489	Signor, are you then a Christian?
8489	What next, Michael?
8489	Why so?
8489	Why, what?
8489	''Did not you take dates out of your portmanteau, and, as you ate them, did not you throw the shells about on both sides?''
8489	***** A person said to me lately,"But you will, for civility''s sake,_ call_ them_ Catholics_, will you not?"
8489	***** Can a politician, a statesman, slight the feelings and the convictions of the whole matronage of his country?
8489	***** Can dialogues in verse be defended?
8489	***** Could you ever discover any thing sublime, in our sense of the term, in the classic Greek literature?
8489	***** How did the Atheist get his idea of that God whom he denies?
8489	***** Must not the ministerial plan for the West Indies lead necessarily to a change of property, either by force or dereliction?
8489	***** Was there ever such a miserable scene as that of the exhibition of the Austrian standards in the French house of peers the other day?
8489	--"Not that I know, my lord,"I replied;"what have I done which argues any derangement of mind?"
8489	--''Did not you sit down when you came hither?''
8489	11.?])
8489	A lady once asked me--"What then could be the intention in creating so many great bodies, so apparently useless to us?"
8489	And can such a feeling be without its effect on the estimation of the wedded life in general?
8489	And how could a_ man_ be a mediator between God and man?
8489	And shall man alone stoop?
8489	And she loved you too?
8489	And then what does this Samuel do?
8489	And what next?
8489	Are all my tears lost, all my righteous prayers Drown''d in thy drunken wrath?
8489	Are domestic charities on the increase amongst families under this system?
8489	Are you not damned eternally?"
8489	Are you, indeed?
8489	As for the House of Lords, what is the use of ever so much fiery spirit, if there be no principle to guide and to sanctify it?
8489	At last I was so provoked, that I said to him,"Pray, why ca n''t you say''old clothes''in a plain way as I do now?"
8489	Ay, thou unreverend boy, Sir Robert''s son: why scorn''st thou at Sir Robert?
8489	Belike you found some rival in your love, then?
8489	Besides, can we altogether disregard the practice of the modern Greeks?
8489	Bowyer asked me why I had made myself such a fool?
8489	But are you sure that they are dead?
8489	But how can it be shown that the principles applicable to an interchange of conveniences or luxuries apply also to an interchange of necessaries?
8489	But tell me, Signor, what_ are_ the differences?"
8489	But your subtle fluid is pure gratuitous assumption; and for what use?
8489	But,_ what_ happiness?
8489	By the by, do you know any parallel in modern history to the absurdity of our giving a legislative assembly to the Sicilians?
8489	By the by, what do you mean by exclusively assuming the title of Unitarians?
8489	Can any thing beat his remark on King William''s motto,--_Recepit, non rapuit_,--"that the receiver was as bad as the thief?"
8489	Can there ever be any thorough national fusion of the Northern and Southern states?
8489	Children are excluded from all political power; are they not human beings in whom the faculty of reason resides?
8489	Colbrand the giant, that same mighty man?
8489	Coleridge?"
8489	Do n''t you see that each is in all, and all in each?
8489	Does such a combination often really exist in rerum naturae?
8489	First, however, what does O. P. Q. mean by the word_ happiness_?
8489	First, where will you begin your collection of facts?
8489	For, has any thing happened that has happened, from any other causes, or under any other conditions, than such as I laid down Beforehand?"
8489	G."And why not, Signor?"
8489	G."But do you not worship Jesus, who sits on the right hand of God?"
8489	G."I''m thinking, Signor, what is the difference between you and us, that you are to be certainly damned?"
8489	G."Then why not worship the Virgin, who sits on the left?"
8489	He will not, can not study; of what avail had all his study been to him?
8489	How can creatures susceptible of pleasure and pain do otherwise than desire happiness?
8489	How can there be a sinful carcass?
8489	How could a poet-- and such a poet as Dante-- have written the details of the allegory as conjectured by Rosetti?
8489	How could he be tempted, if he had no formal capacity of being seduced?
8489	How far are we to go?
8489	How should it be otherwise?
8489	I see no reformer who asks himself the question,_ What_ is it that I propose to myself to effect in the result?
8489	If a man''s conduct can not be ascribed to the angelic, nor to the bestial within him, what is there left for us to refer to it, but the fiendish?
8489	If you take from Virgil his diction and metre, what do you leave him?
8489	In what respect were the Jews more sinful in delivering Jesus up,_ because_ Pilate could do nothing except by God''s leave?
8489	Is Holland any authority to the contrary?
8489	Is it Sir Robert''s son that you seek so?
8489	Is it not just to kill him that has killed another?''
8489	Is it not unnatural to be always connecting very great intellectual power with utter depravity?
8489	Is not its real price enhanced to every Christian and patriot a hundred- fold?
8489	Is not"Romeo and Juliet"a love play?
8489	Is reason, then, an affair of sex?
8489	Is that forehead, that nose, those temples and that chin, akin to the monkey tribe?
8489	Is the House of Commons to be re- constructed on the principle of a representation of interests, or of a delegation of men?
8489	Is the case much altered now, do you know?
8489	Is there, then, no knowledge by which these pleasures can be commanded?
8489	James Gurney, wilt thou give us leave a while?
8489	LADY F. Where is that slave, thy brother?
8489	Must it be another threat of foreign invasion?
8489	My brother Robert?
8489	Now, what would he not have done if he had lived now, and could have availed himself of all our vast acquisitions in physical science?"
8489	Now, would such prohibitions have been fabricated in those kings''reigns, or afterwards?
8489	Of what complexion was she?
8489	Old Sir Robert''s son?
8489	Quale est?_ and_ Quid est?_ the last bringing you to the most material of all points, its individual being.
8489	Quale est?_ and_ Quid est?_ the last bringing you to the most material of all points, its individual being.
8489	Shall we give less credence to John and Paul themselves?
8489	That holds in chase mine honour up and down?
8489	The cavern?
8489	The last are likest to their original, but what pleasure do they give?
8489	Then, again, if a popular tumult were to take place in Poland, who can doubt that the Jews would be the first objects of murder and spoliation?
8489	They''ll hang the faster on for death''s convulsion.-- Thou seed of rocks, will nothing move thee, then?
8489	Think of the sublimity, I should rather say the profundity, of that passage in Ezekiel,[ 2]"Son of man, can these bones live?
8489	Think of upwards of 160 members voting away two millions and a half of tax on Friday[1], at the bidding of whom, shall I say?
8489	Thou calledst him?
8489	Thus shall our healths do others good, Whilst we ourselves do all we would; For, freed from envy and from care, What would we be but what we are?
8489	Was I so mad to bid light torches now?
8489	Was there ever a greater misnomer?
8489	Was there ever such an absolute disregard of literary fame as that displayed by Shakspeare, and Beaumont and Fletcher?
8489	We had ridiculed their_ quiddities_, and why?
8489	Were your bloods equal?
8489	What blasphemy, I should like to know, unless the assuming to be the"Son of God"was assuming to be of the_ divine nature_?
8489	What brings you here to court so hastily?
8489	What can an English minister abroad really want but an honest and bold heart, a love for his country and the ten commandments?
8489	What classes should we admit?
8489	What could he have been but a sort of virtuous Sesostris or Buonaparte?
8489	What could redintegrate us again?
8489	What evil results now to this country, taken at large, from the actual existence of the National Debt?
8489	What further need have we of witnesses?
8489	What have_ we_ to do with him?
8489	What in the eye of an intellectual and omnipotent Being is the whole sidereal system to the soul of one man for whom Christ died?
8489	What is it that Mr. Landor wants, to make him a poet?
8489	What is the spirit which seems to move and unsettle every other man in England and on the Continent at this time?
8489	What make you with your torches in the dark?
8489	What moral object was there, for which such a Messiah should come?
8489	What saidst thou?
8489	What would you think of a law which should tax every person in Devonshire for the pecuniary benefit of every person in Yorkshire?
8489	What, and yours too?
8489	Where are our statesmen to meet this emergency?
8489	Where must we stop?
8489	Who can read with pleasure more than a hundred lines or so of Hudibras at one time?
8489	Who could always follow to the turning- point his long arrow- flights of thought?
8489	Who could fix those ejaculations of light, those tones of a prophet, which at times have made me bend before him as before an inspired man?
8489	Who has not a thousand times seen snow fall on water?
8489	Who is mad now?"
8489	Who would dream, indeed, of comparing Wesley with a Cuvier, Hufeland, Blumenbach, Eschenmeyer, Reil,& c.?
8489	Who would listen to the county of Bedford, if it were to declare itself disannexed from the British empire, and to set up for itself?
8489	Whom must we disfranchise?
8489	Why are not Donne''s volumes of sermons reprinted at Oxford?
8489	Why do we expect the Jews to abandon their national customs and distinctions?
8489	Why need we talk of a fiery hell?
8489	Why not use common language?
8489	Why not_ shillinged, farthinged, tenpenced,_& c.?
8489	Why should not the old form_ agen_ be lawful in verse?
8489	Why should we not wish to see it realized?
8489	Why?
8489	Would he not have said,"You need not make a difficulty; I only mean so and so?"
8489	Would it not be silly to call the Argonauts pirates in our sense of the word?
8489	Would not a total silence of this great apostle and evangelist upon this mystery be strange?
8489	Would you put England on a footing with a country, which can be overrun in a campaign, and starved in a year?
8489	[ 1] Did the name of criticism ever descend so low as in the hands of those two fools and knaves, Seward and Simpson?
8489	[ 1] His Liberty of Prophesying is a work of wonderful eloquence and skill; but if we believe the argument, what do we come to?
8489	[ 1] I have a mind to try how it would bear translation; but what metre have we to answer in feeling to the elegiac couplet of the Greeks?
8489	[ Footnote 1: I know not when or where; but are not all the writings of this exquisite genius the effusions of one whose spirit lived in past time?
8489	[ Footnote 3:"But who is this, what thing of sea or land?
8489	and, secondly, how does he propose to make other persons agree in_ his_ definition of the term?
8489	are all Englishmen Christians?"
8489	are you not Turks?
8489	dost thou mock us, slave?
8489	he is holding his nose at thee at that distance; dost thou think that I, sitting here, can endure it any longer?"
8489	it is my mother:--How now, good lady?
8489	my good lord, of what crime can I be guilty towards you that you should take away my life?''
8489	said Ball,"what can you mean, Sir?"
8489	says the merchant,''how should I kill your son?
8489	was it not so?
8489	where is he?
8489	where will you end it?
8489	why dost thou wonder at it?
8489	you believe in Christ then?"
8488	And art thou then that Virgil, that well- spring, From which such copious floods of eloquence Have issued?
8488	And how do you know then that it was the devil?
8488	But tell me, on your life, have you ever seen a more valorous knight than I, upon the whole face of the known earth? 8488 How many are passed already?"
8488	LAST MONDAY ALL THE PAPERS SAID...Last Monday all the papers said That Mr.---- was dead; Why, then, what said the city?
8488	Whither then are you bound?
8488	Who from my dark abyss Calls me to gaze on this''excess of light?''
8488	Why are you reading romances at your age?
8488	Will you go to Newgate, Sir?
8488	''"Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?"''
8488	''Especially,''do they spare God himself?"
8488	''If there had been any experience in proof of the excellence of our code, where would be our superiority in this enlightened age?''
8488	--"Did you not say it was very like Mrs. Billington singing by your ear?"
8488	--"Was it not very like sweet music?"
8488	1826 WHAT IS LIFE?
8488	Again, poetry implies the language of excitement; yet how to reconcile such language with God?
8488	And Henriot?
8488	And all the thoughts, pains, joys of mortal breath, A war- embrace of wrestling life and death?
8488	And didst them tempt th''ungentle sky To catch one vernal glance and die?
8488	And does no thrill of joy pervade your breasts?
8488	And if sometimes, why not to- day?
8488	And what other language would have been consistent with the divine wisdom?
8488	And what then is the beautiful?
8488	And wherefore fear we death?
8488	Are not the congregated clouds of war Black all around us?
8488	Are the Sections friendly?
8488	Art thou any thing?
8488	Ask you proofs?
8488	Asks he not vengeance on these patriot murderers?
8488	Besides, what is the use of violence?
8488	But did he not say,''Put it up''?
8488	But did not Christ rebuke them, saying,''Ye know not what spirit ye are of?''
8488	But how are we to explain the reaction of this fluxional body on the animal?
8488	But tender blossom, why so pale?
8488	But to whom?
8488	But what here?
8488	But when the said report was found A rumour wholly without ground, Why, then, what said the city?
8488	But where?
8488	But why should they be opposed, when they may be made subservient merely by being subordinated?
8488	But why thy brow o''ercast, thy cheek so wan?
8488	Cain then goes up to shake hands with the Almighty, when Adam says( giving him a cuff),"Ah, would you give your left hand to the Lord?"
8488	Called he any troops of men or angels to defend him?
8488	Can it ever be quoted too often?
8488	Che dal mio centre oscuro Mi chiama a rimirar cotanta luce?"
8488	Che debb''io far?
8488	Dare I accuse him?
8488	Did Brutus fear it?
8488	Did Christ Jesus or his holy followers endeavour, by precept or example, to set up their religion with a carnal sword?
8488	Did Tallien answer, he would soon return?
8488	Did he encourage Peter to dispute his right with the sword?
8488	Didst thou present the letter that I gave thee?
8488	Do not the following passages of Giordano Bruno( published in 1591) seem to imply more?
8488	Dost hear stern winter in the gale?
8488	Dumas?
8488	Fleuriot?
8488	For the''quid ulterius?''
8488	For why do we never have an image of our own faces-- an image of fancy, I mean?
8488	France could not brook A monarch''s sway;--sounds the dictator''s name More soothing to her ear?
8488	Grant this;--but does this fact justify the ungrateful traitor, whose every measure has been to make them still more incapable of it?
8488	Had Chapman read Proclus and Porphyry?--and did he really believe them,--or even that they believed themselves?
8488	He takes care?
8488	Hear ye this, Insulted delegates of France?
8488	Hear ye this, colleagues?
8488	How is this conceivable?
8488	How shall he fully enjoy Wordsworth, who has never meditated on the truths which Wordsworth has wedded to immortal verse?
8488	I-- at whose name the dastard despot brood Look pale with fear, and call on saints to help them Who dares accuse me?
8488	If he-- if all forsake thee-- what remains?
8488	If the artist copies the mere nature, the''natura naturata'', what idle rivalry?
8488	In our very vitals Works not the king- bred poison of rebellion?
8488	Is it for this we wage eternal war Against the tyrant horde of murderers, The crowned cockatrices whose foul venom Infects all Europe?
8488	Is it manifold?
8488	Is it not the spirit of the man?
8488	Is not our will itself a spiritual power?
8488	Is not the Commune ours?
8488	Is there no fit object of charity but abject poverty?
8488	Many think to find bacon, where there is not so much as a pin to hang it on:''but''who can hedge in the cuckoo?
8488	May I not venture to suspect that this was Smith''s own belief and judgment?
8488	Might not Luther and Calvin serve?
8488	Music, my love?
8488	Must we contaminate this sacred hall With the foul breath of treason?
8488	Nay, I could write a book myself, Would fit a parson''s lower shelf, Showing, how very good you are.-- What then?
8488	Or did he countenance his over- zealous disciples, when they would have had fire from heaven to destroy those that were not of their mind?
8488	Resembles life what once was deem''d of light, Too ample in itself for human sight?
8488	Robespierre, what proofs were ask''d when Brissot died?
8488	Say, are ye friends to freedom?
8488	Say, what shall counteract the selfish plottings Of wretches, cold of heart, nor awed by fears Of him, whose power directs th''eternal justice?
8488	Say-- thou man Of mighty eloquence, whose law was that?
8488	Speak, ye accomplice band, Of what am I accused?
8488	Suppose I had discovered, or been wrecked on an uninhabited island, would it be mine or the king''s?
8488	Take a pious Jew, one of the Maccabees, and compare his faith and its grounds with Priestley''s; and then, for what did Christ come?
8488	Take him in his whole,--his head, his heart, his wishes, his innocence of all selfish crime, and a hundred years hence, what will be the result?
8488	Tell me in whose breast Found ye the fatal scroll?
8488	Tell me, by whom thy brother''s blood was spilt?
8488	Tell me, on what holy ground May domestic peace be found?
8488	Terror?
8488	That what?
8488	The distinction is marked in a beautiful sentiment of a German poet: Hast thou any thing?
8488	The ungrateful creatures began to be as insolent and troublesome as before,& c. How should it be otherwise?
8488	These are all excellencies in their kind;--where is the defect?
8488	Thou dost me wrong-- Thy soul distemper''d, can my heart be tranquil?
8488	Thought Barrere so, when Brissot, Danton died?
8488	Thought Barrere so, when through the streaming streets Of Paris red- eyed Massacre, o''er wearied, Reel''d heavily, intoxicate with blood?
8488	Was it by merchant wiles I gain''d you back Toulon, when proudly on her captive towers Wav''d high the English flag?
8488	Was it for this we hurl''d proud Capet down?
8488	Was it not Antony that conquer''d Brutus, Th''Adonis, banquet- hunting Antony?
8488	Was not the younger Caesar too to reign O''er all our valiant armies in the south, And still continue there his merchant wiles?
8488	Were not her weapons prayers, tears, and patience?
8488	What can be the object of human virtue but the happiness of sentient, still more of moral, beings?
8488	What do you mean by it?
8488	What does he habitually wish, habitually pursue?
8488	What figure is here?
8488	What have the public to do with this?
8488	What is beauty?
8488	What is more common than to say of a man in love,''he idolizes her,''''he makes a god of her?''
8488	What is the harm?
8488	What is the seclusive or distinguishing term between them?
8488	What proofs adduced you when the Danton died?
8488	What should we think of the coxcomb who should have objected to him, that he contradicted his own system?
8488	What then is it?
8488	What would''st thou have a good great man obtain?
8488	What-- shall the traitor rear His head amid our tribune, and blaspheme Each patriot?
8488	When at the imminent peril of my life I rose, and, fearless of thy frowning brow, Proclaim''d him guiltless?
8488	When did the true church offer violence for religion?
8488	When did violence ever make a true convert, or bodily punishment, a sincere Christian?
8488	Whence comes the difference?
8488	Who cast in chains the friends of Liberty?
8488	Who screen''d from justice the rapacious thief?
8488	Who shall dare determine what spiritual influences may not arise out of the collective evil wills of wicked men?
8488	Who spared La Valette?
8488	Who to an ex- peer gave the high command?
8488	Who, traitor- like, stept forth Amid the hall of Jacobins to save Camille Desmoulins, and the venal wretch D''Eglantine?
8488	Why are such simulations of nature, as wax- work figures of men and women, so disagreeable?
8488	Why lived Legendre, when that Danton died, And Collot d''Herbois dangerous in crimes?
8488	Why should we joy in an abortive birth?
8488	Why suffer''d ye the lover''s weight to fall On the ill- fated neck of much- loved Ball?
8488	Why this?
8488	Why?
8488	Will not this apply equally to the astronomer?
8488	Would it be difficult to find parallel descriptions in Dryden''s plays and in those of his successors?
8488	Would the abstract propriety of the verses leave him"honourably acquitted?"
8488	Yet what is conscience?
8488	Yet where is the difference, but that the one is a common experience, the other never yet experienced?
8488	[ Footnote 2: Had Casimir any better authority for this quantity than Tertullian''s line,-- Immemor ille Dei temere committere tale--?
8488	and Louvet?
8488	and Vivier?
8488	and how?
8488	and is he not a fine man, too, and a handsome man?"
8488	and the evil,--while he lived, it injured none but himself; and where is it now?
8488	and why should I be in such a tremble all the while he talked?
8488	but is the very essence of rational discourse, that is, connection and dependency done away, because the discourse is infallibly rational?
8488	can clubs, and staves, and swords, and prisons, and banishments reach the soul, convert the heart, or convince the understanding of man?
8488	did not Jesus conquer by these weapons, and vanquish cruelty by suffering?
8488	did th''assassin''s dagger aim its point Vain, as a dream of murder, at my bosom; And shall I dread the soft luxurious Tallien?
8488	didst thou mark him?
8488	had I been so minded, Think ye I had destroy''d the very men Whose plots resembled mine?
8488	hast thou not proscrib''d, Yea, in most foul anticipation slaughter''d Each patriot representative of France?
8488	hear ye this, my brethren?
8488	in Lyons''death- red square Sick fancy groan''d o''er putrid hills of slain, Didst thou not fiercely laugh, and bless the day?
8488	it may be said-- but who has ever thought otherwise?
8488	m''infiamma Essendo spenta, or che fea dunque ardendo?
8488	of what strange crime Is Maximilian Robespierre accused, That through this hall the buzz of discontent Should murmur?
8488	or fought I then With merchant wiles, when sword in hand I led Your troops to conquest?
8488	or secret- sapping gold?
8488	or tell me rather Who forged the shameless falsehood?
8488	or the Grecian friends Who buried in Hipparchus''breast the sword, And died triumphant?
8488	the stern Tribunal?
8488	then, upon the other view of the question, say, Am I in ease and comfort, and dare I wonder that he, poor fellow, acted so and so?
8488	was it then for this We swore to guard our liberty with life, That Robespierre should reign?
8488	was this a time for amorous conference?
8488	what is the common end?
8488	what words can tell?
8488	when appall''d The hireling sons of England spread the sail Of safety, fought I like a merchant then?
8488	when did the true religion persecute?
8488	who lap- dogs guard, Why snatch''d ye not away your precious ward?
8488	who promoted him, Stain''d with the deep die of nobility?
8488	who shall dare belie My spotless name?
8488	who shall speak?
8488	who stops the line of march there?"
8488	why lose the faculty of vision, because my spectacles are broken?
8488	why so grave?
8488	yes, but what in nature,--all and every thing?
6081	And of himselfe imaginid he ofte To ben defaitid, pale and woxin lesse Than he was wonte, and that men saidin softe, What may it be? 6081 And what, Sir,"he said, after a short pause,"might the cost be?"
6081	Only three guineas for selling a thousand copies of a work in two volumes?
6081	Queen of all harmonious things, Dancing words and speaking strings, What god, what hero, wilt thou sing? 6081 STATUE- GHOST.--Will you not relent and feel remorse?
6081	Was not this love? 6081 What then are we to understand?
6081	--"Thirty and two pages?
6081	--a sophism, which I fully agree with Warburton, is unworthy of Milton; how much more so of the awful Person, in whose mouth he has placed it?
6081	--or have brought all the different marks and circumstances of a sealoch before the mind, as the actions of a living and acting power?
6081	--or have spoken of boys with a string of club- moss round their rusty hats, as the boys"with their green coronal?"
6081	A man of fortune?
6081	Alexander and Clytus!--Flattery?
6081	Alexander and Clytus!--anger-- drunkenness-- pride-- friendship-- ingratitude-- late repentance?
6081	And by the latter in consequence only of the former?
6081	And by what rules could he direct his choice, which would not have enabled him to select and arrange his words by the light of his own judgment?
6081	And how came the percipient here?
6081	And how can I do this better than by pointing out its gallant attention to the ladies?
6081	And how much, did you say, there was to be for the money?"
6081	And since then, Sir--?
6081	And to what law can their motions be subjected but that of time?
6081	And what is become of the wonder- promising Matter, that was to perform all these marvels by force of mere figure, weight and motion?
6081	And yet, though under this impression, should have commenced his critique in vulgar exultation with a prophecy meant to secure its own fulfilment?
6081	Anna mia, Anna dolce, oh sempre nuovo E piu chiaro concento, Quanta dolcezza sento In sol Anna dicendo?
6081	Are they the style used in the ordinary intercourse of spoken words?
6081	As eyes, for which the former has pre- determined their field of vision, and to which, as to its organ, it communicates a microscopic power?
6081	But I must yield, for this"( what?)
6081	But Milton-- D. Aye Milton, indeed!--but do not Dr. Johnson and other great men tell us, that nobody now reads Milton but as a task?
6081	But are books the only channel through which the stream of intellectual usefulness can flow?
6081	But are such rhetorical caprices condemnable only for their deviation from the language of real life?
6081	But is this a poet, of whom a poet is speaking?
6081	But is this the order, in which the rustic would have placed the words?
6081	But now, perplex''d by what the Old Man had said, My question eagerly did I renew,''How is it that you live, and what is it you do?''
6081	But tell me, do tell me,--Is I not, now and den, speak some fault?
6081	But what is there to account for the prodigy of the tempest at Bertram''s shipwreck?
6081	But where are the evidences of the danger, to which a future historian can appeal?
6081	But where findeth he wisdom?
6081	But why need I appeal to these invidious facts?
6081	But why should I say retire?
6081	But why then do you pretend to admire Shakespeare?
6081	By meditation, rather than by observation?
6081	By reflection?
6081	CHAPTER XXIII Quid quod praefatione praemunierim libellum, qua conor omnem offendiculi ansam praecidere?
6081	Can any candid and intelligent mind hesitate in determining, which of these best represents the tendency and native character of the poet''s genius?
6081	Coleridge?"
6081	D. But do you not know, that he has distributed papers and hand- bills of a seditious nature among the common people?
6081	Dear, could my heart not break, When with my pleasures ev''n my rest was gone?
6081	Devils, say you?
6081	Does e''en thy age bear Memory of so terrible a storm?
6081	Does he not send for a posse of constables or thief- takers to handcuff the villain, or take him either to Bedlam or Newgate?
6081	Does not the Prior act?
6081	E che non fammi, O sassi, O rivi, o belue, o Dii, questa mia vaga Non so, se ninfa, o magna, Non so, se donna, o Dea, Non so, se dolce o rea?
6081	For surely these words could never mean, that a painter may have a person sit to him who afterwards may leave the room or perhaps the country?
6081	For to what law can the action of material atoms be subject, but that of proximity in place?
6081	For wherein does the realism of mankind properly consist?
6081	Had she remained constant?
6081	Harp?
6081	Hast sent the hare?
6081	Have we not flown off to the contrary extreme?]
6081	Here then shall I conclude?
6081	How can we make bricks without straw;--or build without cement?
6081	How convened?
6081	How is the reader at the mercy of such men?
6081	How shall I explain this?
6081	How then?
6081	How, therefore, is the poor husband to amuse himself in this interval of her penance?
6081	How?
6081	However, as once for all, you have dismissed the well- known events and personages of history, or the epic muse, what have you taken in their stead?
6081	I began then to ask myself, what proof I had of the outward existence of anything?
6081	I know all about it!--But what can anybody say more than this?
6081	IMOG.--(with a frantic laugh) The forest fiend hath snatched him-- He( who?
6081	If a man be asked how he knows that he is?
6081	If he continue to read their nonsense, is it not his own fault?
6081	If it be asked,"But what shall I deem such?"
6081	If possible, what are its necessary conditions?
6081	In fancy I can almost hear him now, exclaiming"Harp?
6081	In the assertion that there exists a something without them, what, or how, or where they know not, which occasions the objects of their perception?
6081	In what sense does he read"the eternal deep?"
6081	In what sense is a child of that age a Philosopher?
6081	In what sense is he declared to be"for ever haunted"by the Supreme Being?
6081	Is I not in some wrong?
6081	Is I not speak English very fine?
6081	Is it comedy?
6081	Is it obtained by wandering about in search of angry or jealous people in uncultivated society, in order to copy their words?
6081	Is it, perhaps, that you only pretend to admire him?
6081	Is the diffusion of truth to be estimated by publications; or publications by the truth, which they diffuse or at least contain?
6081	Is there one word, for instance, attributed to the pedlar in THE EXCURSION, characteristic of a Pedlar?
6081	Is, is-- I mean to ask you now, my dear friend-- is I not very eloquent?
6081	It can not surely be, that the four lines, immediately following, are to contain the explanation?
6081	JOHN.--Are these some of your retinue?
6081	Lastly, if you ask me, whether I have read THE MESSIAH, and what I think of it?
6081	Learning, Sir?
6081	Lyre?
6081	Metre in itself is simply a stimulant of the attention, and therefore excites the question: Why is the attention to be thus stimulated?
6081	Muse, boy, Muse?
6081	My beauty, little child, is flown, But thou wilt live with me in love; And what if my poor cheek be brown?
6081	Need the rank have been at all particularized, where nothing follows which the knowledge of that rank is to explain or illustrate?
6081	No!--A clerk?
6081	No!--A merchant''s traveller?
6081	No!--A merchant?
6081	No!--Un Philosophe, perhaps?
6081	Only fourteen years old?
6081	Or between that of rage and that of jealousy?
6081	Or even if this were admitted, has the poet no property in his works?
6081	Or have represented the reflection of the sky in the water, as"That uncertain heaven received into the bosom of the steady lake?"
6081	Or in the IDLE SHEPHERD- BOYS?
6081	Or in the LUCY GRAY?
6081	Or is wealth the only rational object of human interest?
6081	Or must he rest on an assertion?
6081	Or not far rather by the power of imagination proceeding upon the all in each of human nature?
6081	Or on the other, that they are not prosaic, and for that reason unpoetic?
6081	Or that it is vicious, and that the stanzas are blots in THE FAERY QUEEN?
6081	Or where can the poet have lived?
6081	Our whole information[ 84] is derived from the following words--"PRIOR.--Where is thy child?
6081	Over what place, thought I, does the moon hang to your eye, my dearest friend?
6081	P. But I pray you, friend, in what actions great or interesting, can such men be engaged?
6081	P. It is your own poor pettifogging nature then, which you desire to have represented before you?--not human nature in its height and vigour?
6081	Pierian spring?
6081	Quid autem facias istis, qui vel ob ingenii pertinaciam sibi satisfieri nolint, vel stupidiores sint, quam ut satisfactionem intelligant?
6081	Say rather how dare I be ashamed of the Teutonic theosophist, Jacob Behmen?
6081	Sir, the men are without number, and infinite blindness supplies the place of sight?
6081	Such a position therefore must, in the first instance be demanded, and the first question will be, by what right is it demanded?
6081	That there exist no inconveniences, who will pretend to assert?
6081	The grammar, Sir?
6081	To their question,"Why did you choose such a character, or a character from such a rank of life?"
6081	Vel-- and vat is dhat?
6081	Was it ambition?
6081	Was it his spirit, by spirits taught to write Above a mortal pitch that struck me dead?
6081	What God?
6081	What Man shall we celebrate?
6081	What can be more accurate yet more lovely than the two concluding stanzas?
6081	What happy man to equal glories bring?
6081	What has a plain citizen of London, or Hamburg, to do with your kings and queens, and your old school- boy Pagan heroes?
6081	What have you heard?
6081	What heroes has she reared on her buskins?
6081	What if he himself has owned, that beauties as great are scattered in abundance throughout the whole book?
6081	What literary man has not regretted the prudery of Spratt in refusing to let his friend Cowley appear in his slippers and dressing gown?
6081	What then did he mean?
6081	What then may you be?
6081	What then shall we say?
6081	What?
6081	Whence gained he the superiority of foresight?
6081	Whence then cometh wisdom?
6081	Where dwelleth understanding?
6081	Where is the place of understanding?
6081	Where is thy child?
6081	Who also can deny a portion of sublimity to the tremendous consistency with which he stands out the last fearful trial, like a second Prometheus?
6081	Who can listen to you for a minute, who can even look at you, without perceiving the extent of it?
6081	Who dares suspect it?
6081	Who dies, that bears Not one spurn to the grave of their friends''gift?
6081	Who lives, that''s not Depraved or depraves?
6081	Whom has your tragic muse armed with her bowl and dagger?
6081	Why dost thou urge her with the horrid theme?
6081	Why need I be afraid?
6081	Why, I repeat, do you pretend to admire Shakespeare?
6081	Will it be contended on the one side, that these lines are mean and senseless?
6081	Would then the mere superaddition of metre, with or without rhyme, entitle these to the name of poems?
6081	Yet will Mr. Wordsworth say, that the style of the following stanza is either undistinguished from prose, and the language of ordinary life?
6081	and are they by no other means to be precluded, but by the rejection of all distinctions between prose and verse, save that of metre?
6081	and what are they?
6081	and what do you know of the person in question?
6081	are not our modern sentimental plays filled with the best Christian morality?
6081	by conscious intuition?
6081	by knowledge?
6081	does he ever harangue the people?
6081	e qual pur forte?
6081	have his daughters brought him to this pass?
6081	is--?
6081	non vonne errando, E non piango, e non grido?
6081	only three guineas for the what d''ye call it-- the selleridge?"
6081	or by any form or modification of consciousness?
6081	or hast thou swallow''d her?"
6081	or how can it be called the child, if it be no part of the child''s conscious being?
6081	or so inspired as to deserve the splendid titles of a Mighty Prophet, a blessed Seer?
6081	or, if convened, Must not the magic power that charms together Millions of men in council, needs have power To win or wield them?
6081	the fiend or the child?)
6081	the sentimental muse I should have said, whom you have seated in the throne of tragedy?
6081	thou hast something seen?"
6081	what Hero?
6081	what could this mean?
6081	what man to join with these can worthy prove?
6081	who can the sothe gesse, Why Troilus hath al this hevinesse?
6081	without some lehrning?
41705	How much is that in yards or feet?
41705	If we say so of the Sicilians, why may not Buonaparte say this of the Swiss?
41705	Is not that a nice one?
41705	The Beggar''s Petitionis a fair instance, and what if I dared to add Gray''s"Elegy in a Country Churchyard"?
41705	What do you mean, my love?
41705	A.D. 1806[?
41705	And all the thoughts, pains, joys of mortal breath, A war- embrace of wrestling life and death?
41705	And for what reason, say, rather, for what cause, do you believe immortality?
41705	And if the latter be fit objects of a final cause, why not the former?
41705	And is not man a being capable of Beauty even as of Hunger and Thirst?
41705	And now where is it?
41705	And though it may receive the assent of the people of"the squares and places,"yet what does that do, if it be the ridicule of all other classes?
41705	And what are these?
41705	And what if joy pass quick away?
41705	And what is a moment?
41705	And what is the height and ideal of mere association?
41705	And what then?
41705	And whence arises the pleasure from musing on the latter?
41705	And wherefore?
41705	And who are the friends of the People?
41705	And why is difference linked with hatred?
41705	And why is this?
41705	And yet scarcely more than that other moment of fifty or sixty years, were that our all?
41705	Are not the words precisely appropriate, so that you can not change them without changing the force and meaning?
41705	Are they not pure English?
41705	Are they the poor and despised, the unalphabeted in worldly learning?
41705	Besides, when are the rebukes, the chastisements to commence?
41705	But IT?
41705	But Sweden, Norway, Germany, the Tyrol?
41705	But are they not even now intelligible to man, woman, and child?
41705	But how far is this state produced by pain and denaturalisation?
41705	But the implements with which we reap, how are they gained?
41705	But the question of the source of the remark is, to whom?
41705	But what can I say, when I have declared my abhorrence of the_ Edinburgh Review_?
41705	But what is love?
41705	But who are the swine?
41705	But why?
41705	Can he be an adequate, can he be a good critic, though not commensurate[ with the poet criticised]?
41705	Compare this with the Law of Conscience-- Is it not its specific character to be immediate, positive, unalterable?
41705	Did I not particularly notice the_ un_likeness on my first arrival at Malta?
41705	Do not the bad passions in dreams throw light and show of proof upon this hypothesis?
41705	Does not everyone do this in looking at any conspicuous three stars together?
41705	Does the understanding say nothing in favour of immortality?
41705	Even that is less absurd than the conceit of deducing the Divine being?
41705	Every man asks_ how_?
41705	Final causes answer to why?
41705	For what is forgetfulness?
41705	Fruition?
41705	Grant all this-- that_ they_ will_ out_grow these particular actions, yet with what HABITS of_ feeling_ will they arrive at youth and manhood?
41705	Had I forgot the caterpillar?
41705	Has the bird hope?
41705	Have you never seen a stick broken in the middle, and yet cohering by the rind?
41705	His pains and sorrows[ what are they but] the fertilising rain?
41705	How continued but by a_ causative power_ in the soul?
41705	How indeed is it possible at once to_ love_ Pascal and Voltaire?
41705	How many hostile tenets has it enabled me to contemplate as fragments of truth, false only by negation and mutual exclusion?
41705	How shall we think of this compatibly with the monad soul?
41705	How was this?
41705	I ask, to what do they belong in my waking remembrance?
41705	I could not find it, it was not on the table-- had it dropped on the ground?
41705	I fear I can make nothing out of it; but why do I always hurry away from any interesting thought to do something uninteresting?
41705	I never, except as a forced courtesy of conversation, ask in a stage- coach, Whose house is that?
41705	I quoted your own exposition, and dare you with these opinions charge others with superstition?
41705	I searched and searched everywhere, my pockets, my fobs, impossible places-- literally it had vanished, and where was it?
41705	I turned to Greenough and"Who broke his bottle?"
41705	If my researches are shadowy, what, in the name of reason, are you?
41705	In the first place, here is a prodigality of beauty; and what harm do they do by existing?
41705	Is it a cowardice of all deep feeling, even though pleasurable?
41705	Is it connected with my epistolary embarrassments?
41705	Is it in_ excess_ when on first_ dropping_ asleep we_ fall_ down precipices, or sink down, all things sinking beneath us, or drop down?
41705	Is it love of liberty, of spontaneity or what?
41705	Is it not a strange system which sets prudence against prudence?
41705	Is it not strictly analogous to generation, and no more contrary to unity than it?
41705	Is not a real_ event_ in the body well represented by this phrase?
41705	Is not the reproduction of the lizard a complete generation?
41705	Is not the very nature of superstition in general, as being utterly sensuous,_ cold_ except where it is_ sensual_?
41705	Is there no other edition?
41705	Is there, then, disproportion here?
41705	Is this a guide, or primary guide, that for ever requires a guide against itself?
41705	Is this the metaphysic that bad spirits in hell delight in?
41705	Is very life by consciousness unbounded?
41705	Is''t then a mystery so great, what God and the man, and the world is?
41705	Love as it may subsist between two persons of different senses?
41705	May not many common but false conclusions originate in the neglect of this distinction-- in the confounding of objective and subjective logic?
41705	May there not be gunpowder as well as corn set before it, and the latter will not thrive, but become cinders?
41705	Must she not be, as is thy placid sphere, Serenely brilliant?
41705	N.B.--Why?
41705	O are they the songs of a happy, enduring day- dream?
41705	O that it were the_ prudential_ soul of all I love, of all who deserve to be loved, in every proposed action to ask yourself, To what end is this?
41705	O ye strange locks of intricate simplicity, who shall find the key?
41705	On her return, being asked"Well, what do you think?"
41705	Or have ye lim''d your wings with honey- dew?
41705	Pleasure?
41705	Quid si vivat?
41705	S. T. C. and De Quincey?]
41705	Shall it be in the attractive powers of the different surfaces of the earth?
41705	So Homer''s Juno, Minerva, etc., are read with delight-- but Blackmore?
41705	So should I feel sorrow, if Allston''s mother, whom I have never seen, were to die?
41705	Succession with interspace?
41705	That deep intuition of our_ one_ness, is it not at the bottom of many of our faults as well as virtues?
41705	The fibres, half of them actually broken and the rest sprained and, though tough, unsustaining?
41705	The whole of religion seems to me to rest on and in the question: The One and The Good-- are these words or realities?
41705	There are, I see, weighty arguments on the other side, but are they not to be got over?
41705	These varying and infinite co- present colours, what are they?
41705	This, if true, may be a subtlety, but is it necessarily a trifle?
41705	This-- and what more than this?
41705	Those whispers just as you have fallen asleep-- what are they, and whence?
41705	To extinguish the light of love and of conscience, to put out the life of arbitrement, to make myself and others_ worthless, soulless, Godless_?
41705	To perplex our clearest notions and living moral instincts?
41705	Was he not dragged into it?
41705	Was it the action of the rays of my face upon my eyes?
41705	Were one a Catholic, what a sublime oration might one not make of it?
41705	What an unintelligible, affrightful riddle, what a chaos of limbs and trunk, tailless, headless, nothing begun and nothing ended, would it not be?
41705	What else can there be?--for the substantial mind, for the_ I_, what else can there be?
41705	What if our existence was but that moment?
41705	What if the natural life have two possible terminations-- true Being and the falling back into the dark Will?
41705	What if they break?
41705	What if, in certain cases, touch acted by itself, co- present with vision, yet not coalescing?
41705	What is music?
41705	What is the beginning?
41705	What is the difference between a thermometer and a barometer?"
41705	What is the first and divinest strain of music?
41705	What is the practical result?
41705	What is the solution?
41705	What is the solution?
41705	What is the universal of man in all, but especially in savage states?
41705	What now?
41705	What say I more than this?
41705	What seest thou yonder?
41705	What then are they guilty of who uncover the dormitories of the departed, and throw their souls into hell, in order to cast odium on a living truth?
41705	What then?
41705	What vanity, what self- conceit?
41705	What worse?
41705	What, I say, is the clear dictate of prudence in the matter of friendship?
41705	What, then, is it?
41705	What, then, is sympathy if the feelings be not disclosed?
41705	What_ can_ he do?
41705	Where shall I find an image for this sublime symbol which, ever involving the presence of Deity, yet tends towards it ever?
41705	Which of the two notions is most like the philosopher, which the superstitionist?
41705	Who ever felt a single sensation?
41705	Who has not seen a rose, or sprig of jasmine or myrtle?
41705	Who would have said this even fifty years ago?
41705	Why did I neglect it?
41705	Why not verboil, zerboil; verrend, zerrend?
41705	Why this endless looking out of thyself?
41705	Why were not_ all_ Gods?
41705	Why, then, not acknowledge your obligations step by step?
41705	Why, to be sure, it is called a religion, but the question is, Is it a religion?
41705	Why?
41705	Why?
41705	Why?
41705	Will it be the reverse with Great Britain and America?
41705	Would it act?
41705	Would not the incident be in equal keeping with that of the child, as well as the image and tone of romantic uncommonness?
41705	Yet did we not_ despair wrongfully_ of the people?
41705	[ Compare the three last lines of"What is Life?"
41705	[ Sidenote: A BLISS TO BE ALIVE] Zephyrs that captive roam among these boughs, Strive ye in vain to thread the leafy maze?
41705	[ Sidenote: August, 1811] Why do you make a book?
41705	[ Sidenote: CONSCIENCE AND IMMORTALITY] From what reasons do I believe in_ continuous_ and ever- continuable consciousness?
41705	[ Sidenote: COROLLARY] Between beasts and men, when the same actions are performed by both, are the means analogous or different only in degree?
41705	[ Sidenote: July 20, 1800] Poor fellow at a distance-- idle?
41705	[ Sidenote: THE AIM OF HIS METAPHYSIC] What is it that I employ my metaphysics on?
41705	[ Sidenote: THE IDEA OF GOD] Did you deduce your own being?
41705	[ Sidenote: THE INTOLERANCE OF CONVERTS] Why do we so very, very often see men pass from one extreme to the other?
41705	[ Sidenote: VAIN GLORY] Lord of light and fire?
41705	[ So the MS.] If I played the hypocrite to myself, can I blame my fate that he has, at length, played the deceiver to me?
41705	[ What is this but] to fix morals without morality, and[ to allow] general rules to supersede all particular thought?
41705	[ untranslatable]--the pretended sight- sensation, is it anything more than the light- point in every picture either of nature or of a good painter?
41705	_ Homines sumus et nihil humani a nobis alienum._ But does it follow, therefore, that in_ all_ schools these plans of teaching should be followed?
41705	_ Horace_.--What other word have we?
41705	and how is this the means?
41705	and not the means to something else foreign to or abhorrent from my purpose?
41705	and what are they in nature?
41705	and what then?
41705	and who cared?
41705	and who ever supposed that they did?
41705	and, again, subordinately, in every component part of the picture?
41705	can not we condemn a counterfeit and yet remain admirers of the original?
41705	does not every one see by the inner vision, a triangle?
41705	each attraction the vicegerent and representative of the central attraction, and yet being no other than that attraction itself?
41705	etc., as if you[ were talking to] Wordsworth or Sir G. Beaumont?
41705	how long he talks,"and they never ask themselves, Did this man force himself into your company?
41705	in this hay- time when wages are so high?
41705	no cheap German?
41705	not to how?
41705	or are both reasons the same?
41705	or do you resign all pretence to reason, and consider yourself-- nay, even that in a contradiction-- as a passive[ cir] among Nothings?
41705	or does it abandon itself to the joy of its frame, a living harp of Eolus?
41705	or if not, are they consistent, and capable of being co- or sub- ordinated?
41705	or is every animal a republic_ in se_?
41705	or is it laziness?
41705	or is it something less obvious than either?
41705	or is there one Breeze of Life,"at once the soul of each, and God of all?"
41705	or waste?
41705	quam miserum_, 177 Indian fig and death of an immortal, 177 Kings, what kind of gods?
41705	that is, did my eyes see my face, and from the sidelong and faint action of the rays place the image in that situation?
41705	the dislike that a bad man should have any virtues, a good man any faults?
41705	what the end?
41705	where is it?
41705	why this endless rage for novelty?
41705	why, in short, did not the Almighty create an absolutely infinite number of Almighties?
41705	would Ray or Durham have spoken of God as you spoke of Nature?
8956	Are you sure you feel it?
8956	You see my hand, the hand of a poor, puny fellow- mortal; and will you pretend not to see the hand of Providence in this business? 8956 ''Annon Scriptura ipsa''? 8956 ''Dost than shew wonders among the dead, or shall the dead rise up again and praise thee?'' 8956 ''Ille homo, ut in unitatem filii Dei assumeretur, unde meruit''? 8956 ''Quid egit ante? 8956 ''Quis nisi infidelis negaverit apud inferos fuisse Christum?'' 8956 ''Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?'' 8956 ''Will ye speak wickedly for God, and talk deceitfully for him?'' 8956 ''quod Deus membranam hymenis luniformem reproducere nequit?'' 8956 16.? 8956 30) of St. Mark? 8956 3;--That the establishment of Bishops by the Apostle Paul being granted( as who can deny it?) 8956 And besides, say they, if we get into the way, what matters which way we get in? 8956 And do not we ourselves now do the like? 8956 And how came the devils there? 8956 And how was the Church to judge? 8956 And if this for fear of scandal, why not others? 8956 And not being able longer to contain, he brake out with a lamentable cry, saying,What shall I do?"
8956	And pray what does implicit faith lead men into?
8956	And was the law of God therefore to be annulled?
8956	And what benefit comes to them by Baptism?
8956	And what more does she say now?
8956	And what was this?
8956	And where is the Scriptural authority for this implicit faith?
8956	And who does not know that falsehood may be effected as well by omissions as by interpolations?
8956	And yet if he believed the contrary, then, in his construction of the doctrine of Original Sin, what has Christ done?
8956	Are not then Trinity, Tri- unity,''hypostasis, perichoresis, diphysis'', and others, excluded?
8956	Are we not regenerated back to a state of spiritual infancy?
8956	Are we so mad as to suppose that the pious heathens thought the statue of Jupiter, Jove himself?
8956	As God, he must be present entire in every creature;--(for how can God, or indeed any spirit, exist in parts?)
8956	Besides how is the passage, as commonly interpreted, consistent with the numerous expressions of doubt and even of despondency in Job''s speeches?
8956	Briefly, what does Hooker comprehend in the term''pain?''
8956	But God hath said this;''ergo,''& c. But how is the''minor''to be proved, that God hath said this?
8956	But as all truths hang together, what error is there which may not be proved to be against the foundation of faith?
8956	But by what manner comes He from them?
8956	But farther yet I demand, can infants receive Christ in the Eucharist?
8956	But has he less assurance?
8956	But how am I assured that it is an inspired work?
8956	But if Original Sin be not a sin properly, why are children baptized?
8956	But if bodily only, where is the difference between''ante''and''post Christum?''
8956	But if there be a''jus dominandi''over rational and free agents, then why blame Calvin?
8956	But if this infallibility was stamped on all they said and wrote, is it credible that any part should not be equally binding?
8956	But in what other book of Scripture does the writer assign his own work to a miraculous dictation or infusion?
8956	But is it not contained in the first chapter of St. John''s Gospel?
8956	But it may be asked, Why doth the Lord suffer his children to walk in such darkness?
8956	But may not the"oblations"referred to by Field in the old canon of the Mass, have meant the alms, offerings always given at the Eucharist?
8956	But should we have chosen these words to express our opinion by, if there had been no controversy on the subject?
8956	But to say the truth, was he not safer among the beasts than he could be elsewhere in all the town of Bethlem?
8956	But were it asked of me: Do you then believe our Lord to have been the Son of Mary by Joseph?
8956	But what besides ought we to infer from this and similar facts?
8956	But what if a man, seeing his sin, earnestly desire to hate it?
8956	But what is that to us?
8956	But what pleasures are carnal,--what are sinful diversions,--so I mean as that I may be able to determine what are not?
8956	But what was the fact?
8956	But what, at any rate, had Bunyan to do with the Schools?
8956	But who authorized the Popes to extend this to the soul?
8956	But who began the quarrel?
8956	But why of a clergyman only?
8956	But will this satisfy the mother''s claims on James, or entitle him to her esteem, approbation, and blessing?
8956	By reason?
8956	By secular power?
8956	By the senses?
8956	Can Taylor shew an instance in Scripture in which the Holy Spirit is said to operate simply, and without the co- operation of the subject?
8956	Can any ceremony be more instructive than the words required to explain the ceremony?
8956	Can two more diverse opinions be conceived?
8956	Could the light of such a Gospel as we profess be eclipsed with the interposition of a single marriage?
8956	D. Who, then, is this enemy?
8956	Dare they not trust him that never broke with them?
8956	Dare we conclude from this fact that the spleen is not necessary to the continuance of the canine race?
8956	Dare we say that there was no self- subsistent, though we admit no self- originated, merit in the Christ?
8956	Deny this, and to what does the''modum nescimus''refer?
8956	Did Bunyan refer to the Quakers as rejecting the outward Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord''s Supper?
8956	Did St. Paul by[ Greek: homoi_ómati sarkòs hamartiás] mean a deceptive resemblance?
8956	Did they not call his preaching sedition, and call his miracles conjuring?
8956	Did you ever see your sins, and feel the burden of them, so as to cry out in the anguish of your soul, What must I do to be saved?
8956	Do the material causes act positively, so that with the removal of the body by death the total cause is removed, and of course the effects?
8956	Do they appeal to any document?
8956	Does not this prove too much; namely, that nothing exists in the New which does not likewise exist in the Old Testament?
8956	Does this allude to any real tradition?
8956	Does this allude to the periodical rains?
8956	E. And therefore when the prophet says,''Quis sapiens, et intelliget hæc?
8956	E. If they killed Lazarus, had not Christ done enough to let them see that he could raise him again?
8956	E. What could God pay for me?
8956	Even so our Lord commanded all men to repent, did he therefore include babes of a month old?
8956	For had they not believed his ascent, whence could they have derived the universal expectation of his descent,--his bodily, personal descent?
8956	For if the Senate of Rome were not a lawful power, what could be?
8956	For in such a case, where is''the outward and visible sign of the inward and spiritual grace given?''
8956	For take Taylor''s instances; and I ask whether the words or the sense be meant?
8956	For what is love?
8956	For what rectitude is due to the specifical act of hating God?
8956	For wherein does the Sacrament of the Eucharist differ from that of Baptism, nay, even of grace before meat, when performed fervently and in faith?
8956	For who would not prefer the latter, if the former mean everlasting misery?
8956	Hacket himself repeatedly implies as much; for would he deny that the King with the Lords and Commons is not more than the King without them?
8956	Had St. Paul anything beyond the Law and the Prophets in his mind?
8956	Had he either faith or works before that union of both natures?
8956	Had not John so declared him at the baptism?
8956	Had the followers of George Fox, or any number of them collectively, acknowledged the mad notions of this Hendrick Nicholas?
8956	Has or has not Grotius been overrated?
8956	He spake personally, and he spake aloud, in the declaration of miracles; but''quis credidit auditui Filii?''
8956	His argument was, To what end?
8956	Hooker should have asked-- Has it hitherto had this effect on Christians generally?
8956	How came it that Taylor did not apply the same process to the congeneric question of the freedom of the will?
8956	How can we explain a''species'', when we are wholly in the dark as to the''genus''?
8956	How comes this?
8956	How could he be tempted, if he had no formal capacity of being seduced?"
8956	How could such a man do otherwise?
8956	How could the Church have excluded them from the Canon?
8956	How is it possible that a sick man should have the same certainty of his convalescence as of his sickness?
8956	How many?
8956	How much of truth was there in the Spaniard''s information respecting the intrigues of the Prince and the Duke of Buckingham?
8956	How so?
8956	How then can an inference from a particular, a variously proveable and proof- requiring, position be itself a universal and self- evident one?
8956	How, then, are we to understand it?
8956	How?
8956	How?
8956	I see the wit of this speech; but the wisdom, the Christianity, the beseemingness of it in a Judge and a Bishop,--what am I to say of that?
8956	If Christ delegated no external compulsory power to the Bishops, how came it the duty of princes to God to do so?
8956	If even to seek the Lord be joy, what will it be to find him?
8956	If it be hard to explain how Adam fell; how much more hard to solve how purely spiritual beings could fall?
8956	If it mean more, pray where was the grace in creating a being, who without an especial grace must pass into utter misery?
8956	If so: where is God''s justice in Taylor''s plan more than in Calvin''s?
8956	If tangible by Thomas''s fingers, why not by his teeth, that is, manducable?
8956	If they were symbols of spiritual acts and processes, as Fox and Penn contended, they must have been, or happened;--else how could they be symbols?
8956	If this, then, be not a fundamental article of faith, what can be?
8956	If true, how could it be omitted in so many, and these the most authentic, copies?
8956	In common honesty he must have answered, No!--Do I then blame the Church of England for retaining this ceremony?
8956	In short, where omnipotence is on one side, what but utter impotence can remain for the other?
8956	In this, as in what not?
8956	In whose churches and parishes were all the other pastoral duties, catechizing, visiting the poor and the like, most strictly practised?
8956	Is hell so easy a pain, or are the souls of children of so cheap, so contemptible a price, that God should so easily throw them into hell?
8956	Is it an end only, and not likewise the means?
8956	Is it clear that''Scripturarum''depends on''auctoritate''?
8956	Is it likely to produce this effect and this principally?
8956	Is it merely the triumphal feast; or is it not even more truly a blessed refreshment for and during the conflict?
8956	Is it not admitted that Robert Stephens first divided the New Testament into verses in 1551?
8956	Is it not contained in the eleventh of the Acts, and in a score other separable portions?
8956	Is it not evident that Christ here converted negatives into positives?
8956	Is it not, at least logically considered and at the commencement of an argument, too like a''petitio principii''or''presumptio rei litigatae''?
8956	Is it quite clear that the Macedonian was not the fourth empire; 1. the Assyrian; 2. the Median; 3. the Persian; 4. the Macedonian?
8956	Is not every sheep of his flock a part of the Bishop''s charge, and of course the possible object of his censure?
8956	Is not the last sentence beautiful?
8956	Is not this going too far?
8956	Is not this sacrament medicine as well as food?
8956	Is not this the common doctrine among the Fathers?
8956	Is not this, even with the saving afterwards, too nakedly expressed?
8956	Is then the Creed of greater authority than the inspired Scriptures?
8956	Is this a possible act to any man understanding by the word God what we mean by God?
8956	Is this quite fair?
8956	Is''wane''a misprint for''wave''or''waive?''
8956	It will not be said then,"Did you believe?"
8956	Let all these belong to the overseer of the Church: to whom else so properly?
8956	Might I not almost say, that it rather increases with the decrease of the consciously discerned evidence?
8956	Most true; but still the question returns, what was meant by the phrase''the''Christ?
8956	Nay, what had he believed?
8956	Now do not these Fathers reply, By the Church?
8956	Now do they not worship God in the visible form of bread, and prostrate themselves before pictures of the Trinity?
8956	Now then I demand, whether the prayer of Manasses be so good a prayer as the Lord''s prayer?
8956	On every subject first ask, Is it among the[ Greek: aisthaetà], or the[ Greek: noúmena]?
8956	Opinion?
8956	Or is the prayer of Judith, or of Tobias, or of Judas Maccabeus, or of the son of Sirach, is any of these so good?
8956	Or should I be talking of a chimera, a shadow, or a non- entity?
8956	Perceive we not how they, whose tenderness shrinketh at the least rase of a needle''s point, do kiss the sword that pierceth their souls quite thorow?
8956	Pray what is nature?
8956	Prince, merrily,''Do you deal in such ware?''
8956	Quid credidit''?
8956	Quoere- spiritualiter papaveratorurn?
8956	Reader, was this ever your case?
8956	Shall he not at the altar offer up at once his desire, and the yet lingering sin, and seek for strength?
8956	Should that process, the end and virtue of which is to free the will, destroy the free will?
8956	Surely you would not distinguish the Scripture from its contents?
8956	The Bishop flutters about and about, but never fairly answers the question, What does Baptism do?
8956	This Plato knew; and art thou a master in Israel, and knowest it not?
8956	This appears to me to furnish an interesting example of the bad consequences in reasoning, as well as in morals, of the''cui bono?
8956	This freedom, then, is the free gift of God; but does it therefore cease to be freedom?
8956	This, in the intention of the preacher, may have been sound, but was it safe, divinity?
8956	To the linking of this with that, of A. with Z. by''intermedia,''the term''mode,''--the question''how?''
8956	Upon what ground then does the Church of England reconcile with this decree its reception of the so called Athanasian creed?
8956	Was there Scripture authority for Archbishops?
8956	Was there no King of Kings and Lord of Lords; and does the name Jove instead of Jehovah( perhaps the same word too) make the difference?
8956	We all know what we mean by the Scriptures, but how know we what they mean by the Church, which is neither thing nor person?
8956	Well then, why not say that, since that is all you can mean?
8956	Were Marcus Antoninus and Epictetus idolaters?
8956	Were they not rather perishing for lack of knowledge?
8956	What Romanist ever asserted that a communicant''s palate deceived him, when it reported the taste of bread or of wine in the elements?
8956	What canst thou imagine he could foresee in thee?
8956	What could God suffer?
8956	What could Jeremy Taylor say for the necessity of his sense( which is mine) but what might be said for the necessity of the Nicene Creed?
8956	What did Jerome mean?
8956	What did he mean by the''soul?''
8956	What else can be said?
8956	What had he done?
8956	What in the name of common sense can this mean, that is, speculatively?
8956	What is the apostasy, or fall of spirits?
8956	What is the consequence of the apostasy?
8956	What is this?
8956	What is wisdom?
8956	What occasioned so great a change in its favour since the time of Charles II?
8956	What then is it?
8956	What then?--that God can not make what has been not to have been?
8956	What, then, has the sinner who is the subject of grace no hand in keeping up the work of grace in the heart?
8956	What, then, was their guilt, who by terror and legal penalties tempted their fellow Christians to this treacherous mockery?
8956	What?
8956	What?
8956	Whatsoever the soul finds adverse to her well being, or incompatible with her free action?
8956	Where is the probability of this so long before the existence of the collection since called the New Testament?
8956	Where is the proof that Tertullian was speaking of this Creed?
8956	Where should they remain together?
8956	Where the premisses are so different, who can wonder at the difference in the conclusions?
8956	Where?
8956	Who believed even his report?
8956	Who doubts that all that is indispensable to the salvation of each and every one is contained in the New Testament?
8956	Who is so wise as to find out this way''?
8956	Who knows, but that they would have prevented Judas, and betrayed him for thirty pieces of silver unto Herod?
8956	Why not say at once, that this anti- Scriptural superstition had already begun?
8956	Why not''good tidings?''
8956	Why should the obsolete, though faithful, Saxon translation of[ Greek: euaggélion] be retained?
8956	Why so very harsh a censure?
8956	Why thus change a most appropriate and intelligible designation of the matter into a mere conventional name of a particular book?
8956	Why were not Mr. Charke and the other Canterbury parson called to account, or questioned at least as to the truth of Mrs. Joan''s story?
8956	Why will not Taylor speak out?
8956	Why?
8956	Why?
8956	Why?
8956	Will any man here notwithstanding allege those mentioned human infirmities as reasons why these things should be mistrusted or doubted of?
8956	Will it hold good to say, if it was law after the sanction, it was law before?
8956	Will not this argument justify all idolaters?
8956	Would Taylor assert that the man was made to swallow a poison?
8956	Would more go to hell by nature alone?
8956	Would this prove that the patient''s revalescence had been independent of the medicines given him?
8956	Would you understand with your ears instead of hearing with your understanding?
8956	[ 11] How should the Masorites, when the Hebrew Scriptures were not as far as we know divided into verses at all in their time?
8956	[ Footnote 11: How so?
8956	a propensness, a disposition to goodness, when his grace should come?
8956	and of these how many that would not have been in Bedlam, or fit for it, under some other form?
8956	but what is the nature of the power by which he is to enforce his orders?
8956	but"Were you doers or talkers only?"
8956	cui malo?''
8956	did those Christians, of whom St. Luke speaks, not love their brethren?
8956	how can we understand?
8956	of his Episcopacy Asserted,[ 20] in which he clearly refers to this very question as relying on tradition for its clearness?
8956	or that an act of Parliament is not more than a proclamation?
8956	or what rectitude is it capable of?
8956	so much of nature, and no kind of attempt at a definition of the word?
8956	was this said of the resurgent body of Jesus?
8956	what by the''body?''
8956	what security for the preservation and incorruption of the inspired writings?
8956	which Chrysostom disdains to comment on?
8956	why hast thou forsaken me?''
10801	''Let us lie in wait for the righteous'',& c. How then could Philo have remained a Jew?
10801	And behold a certain lawyer stood up and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do''to inherit eternal life''?
10801	Can he be a sane man who records the subsequent reverie as matter of fact? 10801 Do you love your neighbour?"
10801	For what other separation can be conceived in mind but distinction? 10801 He said unto him,''What is written in the law?
10801	If he have proper instruments:--does not this show that the means are supposed co- present with the knowledge, not the same with it?
10801	Well said, O believer?
10801	''Estne aliquid inter salvum et salutem; inter liberum et libertatem?
10801	''Exclamans quod se Deus reliquisset,& c. Habes ipsum exclamantem in passione, Deus meus, Deus meus, ut quid me dereliquisti?
10801	''What is that to thee''?
10801	( Why?
10801	(''that mercy'') of this discourse?
10801	*** And if you conquer him, what the better are you?
10801	*** But let us ask in return,"Is it worthy of a being wearing the figure of a man to require such proofs as these to determine his judgment?"
10801	--Who would not suppose it notorious that every Methodist meeting- house was a cage of Newgate larks making up their minds to die game?
10801	--but--"Are you certain that Christ has saved''you''; that he died for''you-- you-- you--yourself''?"
10801	--even when our divines do proceed to the religion itself, on what do they chiefly dwell?
10801	98, 99, 100?
10801	A tinder spark gives light to an Argand''s lamp: is it therefore more luminous?
10801	Again, does he admit the authenticity of the Gospels, and the veracity of the Evangelists?
10801	Again, does this eternal damnation of the individual depend on the supposed importance of the article denied?
10801	Am I sure that the Reformers, Luther and the rest collectively, were fanatics?"
10801	And again and again I ask:--Were not these"old moral divines"the authors and compilers of the Homilies?
10801	And can God communicate infinite wisdom and infinite power to a creature or a finite nature?
10801	And can anything be more flittery and special- pleading than Skelton''s objections?
10801	And did he not announce by the Holy Spirit the resurrection to judgment, of glory or of punishment?
10801	And does Scripture permit me to subscribe to an ordinance made in direct contempt of a command of Scripture?
10801	And does the Socinian extricate himself a whit more clearly?
10801	And he was put to death by the appointment and predetermination of God?
10801	And how was the pure bullion so thoughtlessly made as to have an elective affinity for this Devil?
10801	And into what may not any thing be thus explained?
10801	And is it not the meaning of the preacher?
10801	And is not the authorizing another to judge by equity and mercy the same as judging so ourselves?
10801	And is not''Scripture''as often used semi- adjectively?
10801	And pray where is the practical difference?
10801	And pray, how and by whom were the Coronation Oaths first imposed?
10801	And what then?
10801	And whence has the Barrister learnt that the Epistles are not equally binding on Christians as the four Gospels?
10801	And wherein can such a consciousness as that attributed to the Son differ from absolute certainty?
10801	And wherein did Carlestad and Luther differ?
10801	And who shall dare unconditionally condemn those who judged the former to be the better alternative?
10801	And why are the philosophers to be judged according to a different rule?
10801	And will"the far greater part"of the English Clergy remain silent under so atrocious a libel as is contained in this page?
10801	And would his fellow- sectaries thank him, or admit the consequences?
10801	And would you tell him that the very expectation of his just right''was as foolish as it was tyrannical''?"
10801	Are memory, understanding, and volition persons,--self- subsistents?
10801	Are not Philo''s works full of, crowded with, Platonic and Pythagorean philosophy?
10801	Are the many passages concerning the Devil and demoniacs so very easy?
10801	Are there not facts in religion, the causes and constitution of which are mysteries?
10801	Are we bound to receive them as articles of faith?
10801	As interpreted by whom?
10801	As to contingency, whence did Mr. Davison learn that it is a necessary accompaniment of freedom, or of free action?
10801	As to their rejection of the other Gospels and of Paul''s writings, I might ask:--"Could they read them?"
10801	Ask yourselves, therefore,''what you would be at'', and with what dispositions you come to this most sacred table?
10801	B. C. of the''Catechumeni''previously to their Baptismal initiation into the higher mysteries, to the''strong meat''which was not for babes''?
10801	Besides, of what use is it?
10801	But Calvinistic Methodism?
10801	But Law Tracts?
10801	But are not the receivers as bad as the thief?
10801	But are they excluded from the kingdom of heaven, that is, the Christian Church?
10801	But does not Methodism cry aloud that all men are sick-- sick to the very heart?
10801	But here one may say; the sins which daily we commit, do offend and anger God; how then can we be holy?
10801	But how does he express that promise?
10801	But how, I would ask, is this position to be defended?
10801	But if a man begins to reflect on his past life, is he to withstand the inclination?
10801	But if that Name, as power, saved the Jewish Church before they knew the Name, as name, how much more now, if only the will be not guiltily averse?
10801	But in case ten such persons should all, at different times, confirm the same report, how would this affect you?
10801	But should not remembrancers be thrown in the way of sinners, and the voice of warning sound through every street and every wilderness?
10801	But then how is this peculiar to Christ?
10801	But to many of those that dissent from you, they are sinful,& c. But what is all this, good worthy Baxter, but saying and unsaying?
10801	But what excuse shall be made for the revival of this presumptuous encroachment on the divine prerogative in our days?
10801	But what has all this to do with a distinction of Persons?
10801	But what if he breaks his promise and your head?
10801	But what if he has not done it, but the very contrary?
10801	But what makes St. Gregory dispute thus nicely, and oppose the common and ordinary forms of speech?
10801	But what need of many words?
10801	But who can expect more than hints in a marginal note?
10801	But who hath power to forgive or to detain sins?
10801	But why, in the name of common sense, all this endless whoop and hubbub against the Calvinistic Methodists?
10801	But why?
10801	But, except by the Spirit, whence are we to ascertain this?
10801	Call it what you will;--but do you believe the fact?
10801	Can he, who has no share in the danger, be interested in the saving?
10801	Can it be conceived other than as the result of imperfection, that is, finiteness?
10801	Can morality exist without choice;--nay, strengthen in proportion as it becomes more independent of the will?
10801	Can the Barrister have read the New Testament?
10801	Can there be fouler hypocrisy in the Spanish Inquisition than this?
10801	Can this first sentence be other than madness or a lie?
10801	Can we deny that it is unbelief of those things that causeth this neglect and forgetting of them?
10801	Could Luther have been ignorant, that this clause was not inserted into the Apostle''s Creed till the sixth century after Christ?
10801	Could St. Peter with propriety have introduced the truth to a prejudiced audience with its deepest mysteries?
10801	Did Christ say, that true repentance and actual faith would not save a soul, unless the priest''s verbal remission was superadded?
10801	Did Dr. Hawker say that it was impossible to produce an assent to the historic credibility of the facts related in the Gospel?
10801	Did any Methodist ever teach that salvation may be attained without sanctification?
10801	Did he in good earnest believe that there is but one man in the world?
10801	Did he say that it was impossible to become a Socinian by the weighing of outward evidences?
10801	Did not John the Baptist himself teach a pure system of moral truth?
10801	Did the Jews reject those doctrines?
10801	Do not the plainest intuitions of our moral and rational being confirm the positions here attributed to the Deist, Dechaine?
10801	Do they believe them literally?
10801	Do they indeed solemnly pray to their Maker weekly, before God and man, in the words of a Liturgy, which, they know,"can not be believed?"
10801	Do we not admit by this very phrase"enlightened,"that we owe our exemption to our intellectual advantages, not primarily to our moral superiority?
10801	Do we not pray by Act of Parliament twenty times every Sunday''through the only merits of Jesus Christ''?
10801	Do you hold that a man is justified by this regeneration, as is St. Austin''s opinion?
10801	Do you not believe these facts?"
10801	Does faith commence by generating the receptivity of itself?
10801	Does he credit the facts there related, and as related?
10801	Does he, or can he, exist as a conscious individual agent or person?
10801	Does it not follow therefore, that there are perfections which the All- perfect does not possess?"
10801	Does not Christ himself say the same in the plainest and most unmistakable words?
10801	Does not Jude refer to an apocryphal book?
10801	Does not every man stand or fall to his own Maker according to his own being?
10801	Does not this require infinite wisdom and infinite power?
10801	Does our author think that no atheist or infidel, no unbelieving Jew or heathen, ever used reasonable diligence to be rightly informed?
10801	Does the Athanasian or rather the''pseudo''-Athanasian Creed differ from the Nicene, or not?
10801	Does the law excuse the murder because the perpetrator was drunk?
10801	For do not the duties and temptations occur in real life even so intermingled?
10801	For does not his reason equally extend to the Christian Faith itself, as to those points which have been controverted in Christian Churches?
10801	For how can any spiritual truth be comprehended?
10801	For the one tenet in which the Calvinist differs from the majority of Christians, are there not ten in which the Socinian differs from all?
10801	For why?
10801	Had Waterland ever thought of the relation of his own understanding to his reason?
10801	Has Christ declared any antipathy to washerwomen, or the Holy Ghost to warm suds?
10801	Has not God himself expounded it?
10801	Has there been any union lately?
10801	Have the Persons attributes distinct from their nature;--or does not their common nature constitute their common attributes?
10801	Have the followers of Wesley abjured the doctrines of their founder on this head?
10801	Have they at length exploded all"doctrinal mysteries?"
10801	Have we not adopted the Hebrew word, Jehovah,?
10801	Have you any doubts about the truth of what is told us by the historians concerning that memorable transaction?
10801	He does not seem to be aware of the school- boy distinction between the[ Greek: hóti esti] and the[ Greek: dióti]?
10801	How came it that Peter saw miracles countless, and yet was without faith till the Holy Ghost descended on him?
10801	How can obedience exist, where disobedience was not possible?
10801	How could a man of Noble''s sense and sensibility bring himself thus to profane the awful name of Milton, by associating it with the epithet"Puritan?"
10801	How could a regenerate saint put off corruption at the sound of the trump, if up to that hour it did not in some sense or other appertain to him?
10801	How else could it be a birth,--a creation?
10801	How far?
10801	How many Methodists, does the Barrister think, ever saw, much less read, a work of Calvin''s?
10801	How readest thou?''"
10801	How so?
10801	How then can the Son be righteous?)
10801	How then can they be excluded from a share in Church Government?
10801	How was the religious, as distinguished from the moral, sense first awakened?
10801	I do not see the necessity of this: does not Christ say,''My Father and I will come and we will dwell in you?''
10801	I would ask one of them again, How they can know that it is daylight, except some light a candle to let them see it?
10801	If Christ had no Church then, where was his wisdom, his love, and his power?
10801	If Christ had reasoned so, why did not the Barrister quote his words, instead of putting imaginary words in his mouth?
10801	If he feels a commencing shame and sorrow, is he to check the feeling?
10801	If he scorns the name of Socinus as his authority, and appeals to Scripture, do not the Methodists the same?
10801	If it be the same as the Nicene, why not be content with the Nicene?
10801	If it differs, how dare we retain both?
10801	If it were otherwise, how could it be imputed as righteousness?
10801	If it"concerned him only as a man,"why is he placed after the angels?
10801	If not, what are they to the purpose?
10801	If not, what may all this mean?
10801	If not, what use is either the granting or the withholding?
10801	If not, why Elijah rather than any other Prophet?
10801	If not, why do you stop here?
10801	If so, then so is all philosophy: for what system is there, the elements and outlines of which are not to be found in the Greek schools?
10801	If the Father can do the former, why not the latter?
10801	If they are not indifferent, why did you previously concede them to be such?
10801	If you have the impudence to persevere in mis- naming this"love,"supply any one instance in which you use the word in this sense?
10801	In other words that ABC are so legible that they are legible to every one that has learnt to read?
10801	In the Trinity all the''How s''?
10801	In the name of patience, over and over again, who has ever denied this?
10801	In the original doctrines expressed in the premisses?
10801	In the particular deductions, logically considered?
10801	In what consists its necessity?
10801	In what part of their works?
10801	In what respect, I pray, can this statement be strengthened by any reasoning about the nature and distinctive essence of miracles''in abstracto''?
10801	In what sense?
10801	In what work do they quote him?
10801	Is a mere creature a fit lieutenant or representative of God in personal or prerogative acts of government and power?
10801	Is any creature capable of the government of the world?
10801	Is it certain that the so called Apostles''Creed was more than the mere catechism of the Catechumens?
10801	Is it not a conviction produced in the mind by adequate testimony?
10801	Is it not mere repetition in time?
10801	Is it not more probable that a living prophet had delivered the charge to Cyrus?
10801	Is it not the effect of all illustrious examples, of those probably most which we last read of, or which made the deepest impression on our feelings?
10801	Is it not the very nose which( of flesh or wax) this very Legislature insists on as an indispensable qualification for every Christian face?
10801	Is mercy incompatible with righteousness?
10801	Is not God conscious of every thought of man;--and would Sherlock allow me to deduce the unity of the divine consciousness with the human?
10801	Is not God conscious to all my thoughts, though I am not conscious of God''s?
10801	Is not the lack thereof a felonious deformity, yea, the grimmest feature of the''lues confirmata''of statute heresy?
10801	Is not the reconciling of these facts or''phænomena''with the divine attributes, one of the purposes of a revealed religion?
10801	Is not the regeneration likewise''gratis'', only by God''s mere mercy?
10801	Is not this the case with the Houses of Legislature?
10801	Is not this to all intents and purposes ascribing partibility to God?
10801	Is the following argument worthy our consideration?
10801	Is there a single moral precept of the Gospels not to be found in the Old Testament?
10801	Is there sufficient reason to assert them to have been direct revelations immediately vouchsafed to the sacred writers?
10801	Is this Barrister a Christian of any sort or sect, and is he not ashamed, if not afraid, to ridicule such passages as these?
10801	Is this second''hypothesis''compatible with the acts and functions attributed to the Devil in Scripture?
10801	Know you not that the redeemed of Christ and He are one?
10801	Must he not have begun with the most evident facts?
10801	Must not every being be represented by one of his own kind, a man by a man, an angel by an angel, in such acts as are proper to their natures?
10801	Must we therefore reject the most certain truths concerning the Deity, only because they are incomprehensible,& c.?
10801	Need I say I incline to Sherlock?
10801	No wonder;--because the babe would perish without the mother''s milk, is it therefore loathsome to the mother?
10801	Nor I; but what then?
10801	Not"Do you wish to love God?"
10801	Now I will answer for the Methodists''unhesitating assent and consent to it; but would the Barrister subscribe it?
10801	Now how can the Son''s being conscious that the Father is conscious that he is not the Son, constitute a numerical unity?
10801	Now this''Symbolum''was to bring together all that must be believed, even by the babes in faith, or to what purpose was it made?
10801	Now what is your opinion Sir?
10801	Now where is the authority of the Athanasian Creed?
10801	On the doctrines peculiar to the religion?
10801	On what ground can it be asserted that the Stoics believed in the actual existence of their God- like perfection in any individual?
10801	One answer is obvious enough, that the contemporaries of John held Elijah as the common representative of the Prophets; but did Malachi do so?
10801	Or does he know it only by quotations?
10801	Or has any late Socinian divine discovered, that Do as ye would be done unto, is an interpolated precept?
10801	Or on the moral state of the individual, on the inward source of this denial?
10801	Or what does he mean exclusively by the latter?
10801	Ought I not therefore to retract the note p. 80?
10801	Ought not this single quotation to have satisfied the Barrister, that no practical difference is deducible from these doctrines?
10801	Pray Mr. Dechaine, are you able, upon the Deistical scheme to rid yourself of this difficulty?
10801	Pray, Mr. Dechaine, did you see Julius Cæsar assassinated in the Capitol?
10801	Pray, then,( for I will take the Barrister''s own commentary,) what does the man of common sense mean by grace?
10801	Shall we believe you, and not rather the companions of Christ, the eye and ear witnesses of his doings and sayings?
10801	Should such a man,''compos mentis'', exist,( which I more than doubt,) what could a wise man do but stare-- and leave him?
10801	Some probably will say,"What argument can induce us to believe a man in a concern of this nature who gives no visible credentials to his authority?"
10801	Surely this is a most abominable profanation of all that is serious,& c. And where pray is the absurdity of this?
10801	That is, can a creature be made a true and essential God?
10801	That such parts are intelligible as the Barrister understands?
10801	That such parts as it possesses in common with all systems of religion and morality are plain and obvious?
10801	The belief of the Alexandrian Jews who had acquired Greek philosophy, no doubt;--but of the Palestine Jews?
10801	The question is, whether it is wise or expedient, which it may be, or rather may have been, in Scotland, and the contrary in England?
10801	The question is:--Does a thief( and a fraudulent debtor is no better) acquire a claim to impunity by not possessing the power of restoring the goods?
10801	The question, therefore, is:--Is a national Church, established by law, compatible with Christianity?
10801	The rule applies till an extreme case occurs; and how can this be proved?
10801	The sacred volume of Holy Writ declares that''true''( pure?)
10801	The words here should have been printed,"God is all, and yet is no thing;"For what does''thing''mean?
10801	Then if so, what becomes of the Persons?
10801	Then what can we believe respecting these causes?
10801	Then why all this reasoning?
10801	Then why do we make tri- personality in unity peculiar to God?
10801	Then( saith the understanding,[ Greek: Tò phrónaema sarkòs]) what doth prayer effect?
10801	They are one and the same plant, justification the root, sanctification the flower; and( may I not venture to add?)
10801	This is the only( defect, shall I say?
10801	To a man who denies a God, or that God can reveal his will to mankind?
10801	To dissuade men from reasoning on a subject beyond our faculties?
10801	To know God as God([ Greek: tòn Zaena], the living God) we must assume his personality: otherwise what were it but an ether, a gravitation?
10801	To me,( why do I say to me?)
10801	To such I would only say, Are you in a willing league with any known sin?
10801	To what purpose then this windy declamation about John Calvin?
10801	To what purpose were these Reflections, taken as a whole, written?
10801	To whom is it addressed?
10801	True; but is it more than a dispute about words?
10801	Under such evidence of God''s wrath how canst thou expect to be saved?"
10801	Under what conditions?
10801	Was Christ innocent?
10801	Was Pordage''s work translated into German?
10801	Was ever blindness like unto this blindness?
10801	Was he not''the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world''?
10801	Was it the Baptismal Creed of the Eastern or Western Church, especially the former?
10801	Was not Peter''s sentence against Ananias an act of Church government?
10801	Well may the heart cry out,"Who shall deliver me from the''body of this death'',--from this death that lives and tyrannizes in my body?"
10801	Well, and who doubts this?
10801	Well, and would you call this corruption or incorruptibility?
10801	Were all damned who died during the period when''totus fere mundus factus est Arianus'', as one of the Fathers admits?
10801	Were the Nicolaitans a sect, properly so called?
10801	Were there no good men before Christ, as there were no bad men before Adam?
10801	Were you ever at Constantinople, Sir?
10801	What Arminians?
10801	What analogy does immortal suffering bear to the only death which is known to us?
10801	What answered Christ?
10801	What can this word mean less or other than that Sir H. W. was either a crypt- Papist, or had received a bribe from the Romish party?
10801	What could have been given by the Legislature to the latter which might not be given to the former?
10801	What did Luther mean by a body?
10801	What if he preaches and publishes without it, will the Legislature dungeon him or not?
10801	What is death?--an unhappy life?
10801	What is it to us whether Angels are the spirits of just men made perfect, or a distinct class of moral and rational creatures?
10801	What is the meaning of these words, that occur so often in the works of great saints?
10801	What is the true import of this phrase?
10801	What is''faith''?
10801	What makes him so zealous then against saying, that Peter, James and John are three men?
10801	What may not be explained thus?
10801	What means this hollow cant-- this fifty times warmed- up bubble and squeak?
10801	What obligation lay on the Scottish Parliament and Church to consult the man Charles Stuart''s personal likes and dislikes?
10801	What power not possessed by the Rector of a parish, would he have wished a parochial Bishop to have exerted?
10801	What purpose can be answered by any pretended definition of a miracle?
10801	What says the reverend critic to this?
10801	What shall we say then?
10801	What should we think of the grammarian, who, instead of''Historical'', should present us with"Lectures on''History''Facts?"
10801	What then does Baxter quarrel about?
10801	What then may this singular expression mean?
10801	What then?
10801	What was become of the glory of his redemption, and his Catholic Church, that was to continue to the end?
10801	What was the sentence passed on a heretic?
10801	When do they refer to Calvin?
10801	Whence came the Devil?
10801	Whence this sudden palsy in the limbs of your charity?
10801	Where lies the fault?
10801	Where then?
10801	Who can comprehend his own will; or his own personeity, that is, his I- ship( Ichheit''); or his own mind, that is, his person; or his own life?
10801	Who does not feel the insufficiency of this answer?
10801	Who expects in realities of any kind the sharp outline and exclusive character of scientific classification?
10801	Who that had even rested but in the porch of the Alexandrian philosophy, would not rather say,''of substantiating powers and attributes into being?''
10801	Who told the Barrister this?
10801	Who would not rather live in Algiers?
10801	Who?
10801	Why Calvinistic Methodism?
10801	Why called the''Son''simply, instead of the Son of Man, or the Messiah?
10801	Why disjoin them?
10801	Why is this?
10801	Why need I refer to Isaiah or Micah?
10801	Why no traces in his latest work, or those of his middle age?
10801	Why not-- as is felt to be for the interest of science in all the physical sciences-- retain the same term in all languages?
10801	Why run off from the fact in question, or the class at least to which it belongs?
10801	Why should we use the equivocal word,''substance''( after all but an''ens logicum''), instead of the definite term''self- subsistent?''
10801	Why then any Creed?
10801	Why?
10801	Will any man in his senses affirm, that my knowledge is increased by saying"all"three times following?
10801	Will he tell me, to the Devil?
10801	Will their sins lessen mine, though they were greater?
10801	With such doubts how can the Apostles''Creed be preferred to the Nicene by a consistent member of the Reformed Catholic Church?
10801	With what face indeed can we congratulate ourselves on being born in a more enlightened age, if we so bitterly abuse not the practice but the agents?
10801	Would Luther have given up the doctrine of justification by faith alone, had the majority of the Council decided in favor of the Arminian scheme?
10801	Would Sherlock endure that I should infer:''ergo'', God is numerically one with me, though I am not numerically one with God?
10801	Would not every syllable apply, yea, and more strongly, more indisputably?
10801	Yet by what right if he acts only as an individual?
10801	Yet how can Arminians pray our Church prayers collectively on any day?
10801	Yet why tremble for a belief which is the very antipode of faith?
10801	[ 3] What says he to this Barrister, and his Hints to the Legislature?
10801	a Greek substitute, in countless instances, for the Hebrew Jehovah?
10801	and must not God then be represented by one who is God?
10801	and so you doubtless regret the loss of an eye or arm:--will that make it grow again?--Think you this nonsense as applied to morality?
10801	but by what authority is this synonimizing"or"asserted?
10801	but only to read Calvin''s account of that repentance, without which there is no sign of election, and to call it"the more comfortable of the two?"
10801	by what fascination could your spirit be drawn away from passages like this, to guess and dream over the rhapsodies of the Apocalypse?
10801	can self- will more plainly put on the cracked mask of tender conscience than by refusal of obedience?
10801	did he not uniformly require faith as the condition of obtaining the"evidence,"as this Barrister calls it-- that is, the miracle?
10801	for it?
10801	hast thou not revealed to us the being of a conscience, and of reason, and of will;--and does this Barrister tell us, that he"understands"them?
10801	if this be possible now, or at any time henceforward, whence came the dross?
10801	is it not a direct consequence from this system, that we all purchase our existence at the price of our mother''s purity of mind?
10801	is not the Christian religion a''revealed''religion, and have we not the most miraculous attestation of its truth?
10801	is this fair?
10801	or again, the Consubstantiationist, or the Transubstantiationist?
10801	or that either the Sacramentary or the Lutheran?
10801	or what if he will not promise?
10801	our opponents will perhaps reply,***"Was it not by miracles that the prophets( some of them) testified their authority?
10801	the Bishops, or the dignified Clergy?
10801	the sins--rhubarb is Jesus Christ,& c. Who seeth not here( said Luther) that such significations are mere juggling tricks?
10801	who then at any time would or could have believed the Gospel, and forsaken Moses?