This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
| identifier | question |
|---|---|
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | Are there different rights assigned for physical vs. digital materials? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | Are these rights documented in CONTENTdm? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | Can a shared and extensible data model be developed to support the differing needs and demands for a range of material types and institution types? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | Perhaps we should also uncover and share different communities ’ understandings of more generalized concepts? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | What is the right mix of human attention and automation to effectively reconcile metadata headings to linked data entities? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | What types of tools can help extend the description of cultural materials to subject matter experts? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | Would MDL ’s metadata withstand this kind of work? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • How and when should a “ placeholder ” entity description be created, for things that lack an established identity? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • How are access, use, and reuse rights managed at your institution? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • How could advancing racial equity in CONTENTdm descriptive metadata be facilitated? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • How is CONTENTdm technical and administrative metadata managed? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • What are the institutional and individual interests in the paradigm shift of moving to linked data? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • What is the right mix of human attention and automation to effectively reconcile metadata headings to linked data entities? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • What types of tools can help extend the description of cultural materials to subject matter experts? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • What user research practices have been applied to evaluate your systems? |
| 0yLgw3HoKQ | • Who is using the CONTENTdm Catcher utility, and who else might use it that is n’t yet? |