quadgram

This is a table of type quadgram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

quadgram frequency
for the sake of180
at the same time148
what do you mean147
in the first place144
the nature of the139
guardians of the law122
on the other hand121
with a view to111
the guardians of the99
as i was saying87
in the case of84
the rest of the79
if i am not78
i am not mistaken75
is not to be74
i should like to73
that is to say70
as well as the70
the wardens of the70
mean to say that65
by the help of64
in the same way61
of the nature of61
there can be no59
as well as of56
as well as in56
the manner in which55
to me to be54
and that which is53
the art of the53
that there is a51
at the end of50
what do you say49
and this is the49
he does not know48
i mean to say46
and he who is46
i will tell you45
the meaning of the45
the sake of the44
in so far as44
and if any one44
they are to be44
the use of the43
that which is not43
do you think that42
in a state of42
may be said to42
a view to the42
i do not know41
in the course of41
that the soul is41
the end of the41
i think that we41
in the use of40
the mind of the40
appears to me to40
of the human mind40
the existence of the39
that there is no39
and what is the39
under the idea that38
the soul of the37
is not the same37
you mean to say37
if he be a36
to say that the36
in the next place36
with the exception of36
one and the same36
in the history of35
wish that you would35
in the form of35
i wish that you35
for there is no35
i dare say that35
as we were saying34
to do with the34
as far as possible34
there is also a34
and there is no33
is the nature of33
of the art of33
there is no difficulty33
may be supposed to33
i think that you33
hope that you will33
in the same manner33
i think that i33
wardens of the city33
there is no reason32
i hope that you32
is the meaning of32
the same as the32
to be found in32
should like to know32
there would be no32
the knowledge of the32
which he does not31
the greater part of31
the name of the31
to be regarded as31
any one who is31
in the language of31
shall we say that30
may be compared to30
we were just now30
that he is not30
of that which is30
am i not right30
a great deal of30
but there is no30
i should say that30
by reason of the29
the idea of good29
in the second place29
in order that the29
i do not think29
how do you mean29
appears to be the29
and there is a29
neither good nor evil29
translated by benjamin jowett29
for the most part28
the case of the28
in which they are28
what would you say28
of good and evil28
of which we are28
do not think that28
are not to be28
persons of the dialogue28
i was just now28
at the time of28
as in the republic28
that there are two27
rest of the world27
the order of the27
the motion of the27
is or is not27
the character of the27
the dialogues of plato27
and if he be27
and in like manner27
and i think that27
has to do with27
in the days of26
the history of philosophy26
as well as to26
under the influence of26
is the same as26
measure of all things26
but that which is26
as far as they26
in the spirit of26
so far as they26
is no difficulty in26
in the mind of25
not the same as25
i want to know25
in the world below25
and i hope that25
i will endeavour to25
and is not the25
is the source of25
we do not know25
the place of the25
the one and many25
and at the same25
and now let us25
would you say that25
may be compared with25
after the manner of25
that all things are25
the relation of the25
well as in the25
what has been said25
from time to time25
by us to be25
is the art of25
of those who are24
in accordance with the24
immortality of the soul24
i am going to24
wardens of the agora24
far as they are24
as well as a24
right in saying that24
the immortality of the24
the measure of all24
no such thing as24
to speak of the24
and in this way24
what is the meaning24
is the cause of24
the centre of the24
there will be no24
there are two kinds24
in relation to the24
i am sure that24
let me ask you24
is the reason why24
and out of the23
such a thing as23
is said to have23
is said to be23
is to be the23
that the art of23
that part of the23
the way in which23
of pleasure and pain23
is the opposite of23
is the measure of23
the power of the23
i do not understand23
in the presence of23
and the art of23
i am afraid that23
the union of the23
know the nature of23
you are quite right22
what is the nature22
and for this reason22
would you say of22
the reason of this22
be the same as22
you do not know22
think that there is22
and the rest of22
is concerned with the22
to a certain extent22
may be said of22
what you are saying22
plato translated by benjamin22
we say that the22
by plato translated by22
be compared to the22
be said to be22
into the nature of22
what i am saying22
the form of a22
be said to have22
in the age of22
is a sort of22
meaning of the word22
of the same and22
is one of the22
the friend of the22
but i do not21
we not say that21
of the one and21
the revolution of the21
if he be of21
of the guardians of21
the greatest number of21
is that which is21
by benjamin jowett introduction21
are two kinds of21
at the time when21
in the way of21
one of them is21
one to the other21
you agree with me21
in the place of21
there is a great21
about the nature of21
that they may be21
a part of the21
is supposed to be21
there may be a21
be put to death21
by the use of21
the form of the21
say that they are21
relation to one another20
is and is not20
be punished with death20
the island of atlantis20
is the friend of20
which is to be20
which we were just20
the same with itself20
to go to war20
the one and the20
and he who has20
shall i tell you20
at the beginning of20
of the existence of20
as if they were20
be supposed to have20
and when they have20
to the mind of20
wardens of the country20
he be of the20
of the things which20
in which he is20
but i should like20
could not have been20
that he is a20
and do you think19
to be the same19
come to the rescue19
but if he be19
the cause of the19
at the hands of19
the names of the19
do you say of19
the things which are19
may be summed up19
of the law shall19
nor is there any19
may be regarded as19
a man who is19
in like manner the19
to be the best19
i suppose that you19
to be a good19
the genuineness of the19
in the order of19
the doctrine of ideas19
the greatest of evils19
in the words of19
well as of the19
is made up of19
what you say is19
i want you to19
and there are many19
the laws of the19
as in the case19
other than the one19
to that which is19
a part of virtue19
the courses of the19
of which we were19
do not know what19
virtue can be taught18
in the minds of18
dare say that you18
for that which is18
was just now saying18
ought not to be18
i would have you18
to be able to18
the exception of the18
if one is not18
the value of the18
the one is not18
be supposed to be18
he is to be18
of which they are18
and what would you18
nothing to do with18
are not the same18
in the following manner18
that this is the18
if they are not18
not be able to18
the same may be18
is neither good nor18
this is the reason18
there is such a18
let us proceed to18
part of the world18
of which he is18
i think that the18
the circle of the18
a person were to18
of being and not18
there is no such18
have to do with18
the greatest of all18
do as you say18
the parts of the18
and if they are18
the truth is that18
that they are not18
existence of the gods18
and what do you18
but what is the18
the nature of this17
union of the two17
and if a man17
will be able to17
in the centre of17
if he do not17
guardian of the law17
the rest of mankind17
may be truly said17
of them is the17
can be no doubt17
in the scale of17
you say that the17
greater part of the17
look at the matter17
same may be said17
in such a case17
that you and i17
i am about to17
but he who is17
at variance with the17
the art of medicine17
the laws of plato17
you would tell me17
he who would be17
the same with the17
is to be found17
i said at first17
the one which is17
one of the two17
that appears to be17
manner in which the17
the creation of the17
be compared with the17
can you tell me17
that there are gods17
be regarded as a17
are said to be17
that they are the17
in order that he17
the souls of the17
the opinion of the17
and in the same17
the words of the16
and at another time16
the guardian of the16
will have to be16
be regarded as the16
of those who have16
the son of a16
is no reason why16
are apt to be16
the origin of the16
what shall we say16
a man who has16
there is no one16
of the same kind16
as i was just16
or if he be16
that is what i16
the mind of plato16
who does not know16
the writings of plato16
what is to be16
to him who is16
do you suppose that16
be truly said to16
as far as i16
what do you think16
supposed to be the16
and the power of16
at the conclusion that16
of them in the16
not be allowed to16
to have been the16
is of opinion that16
in order that we16
in the hope that16
who is of the16
the conception of the16
from one to the16
if you do not16
of pleasures and pains16
to you to be16
the things of the16
is likely to be16
be the friend of16
of both of them16
if there be such16
said to have been16
the will of god16
have the care of15
is a kind of15
but they are not15
the eye of the15
be one of the15
the figure of the15
to know whether you15
if he does not15
the minds of men15
and when they are15
pass into one another15
like to know whether15
appear to me to15
which is concerned with15
any more than in15
if a man is15
in the habit of15
do you not see15
in the art of15
but the truth is15
that a man should15
i would not have15
if the one is15
he who does not15
the language of the15
in as far as15
not the same with15
the description of the15
and then we shall15
for i do not15
the good and the15
when a man is15
of the soul is15
i thought that i15
is a part of15
order that he may15
that you are right15
in the matter of15
the spirit of the15
that the world is15
as the proverb says15
i agree with you15
or of any other15
the history of the15
in a mean between15
would you not say15
sake of the good15
in our own day15
those who have been15
is no reason to15
for there is a15
of all of them15
to be attributed to15
the light of day15
the art of rhetoric15
what will be the15
the number of the15
and if this is15
the truth of the15
which of the two14
art of the general14
will you tell me14
of soul and body14
the one that is14
may be expected to14
in the class of14
those who have the14
the difference between the14
that which is neither14
be the same with14
out of the way14
on the part of14
the course of the14
and in the second14
and the use of14
no difficulty in seeing14
the same and the14
will endeavour to explain14
do you mean to14
itself and the others14
the help of the14
of the earlier dialogues14
that he will be14
he is not a14
i do not see14
that they do not14
the one will be14
you say of the14
by reason of their14
and i do not14
the manner of the14
that he ought to14
and if he is14
he is unable to14
another point of view14
they do not know14
you think that you14
he is not to14
arises out of the14
in the light of14
they are the same14
and that they are14
do you mean by14
when you say that14
which is the most14
that he does not14
the care of the14
that i am not14
in the midst of14
how can there be14
shall be punished with14
is not that true14
or in any other14
the good of the14
is such a thing14
through the medium of14
and the same may14
if this is true14
under the guidance of14
is a question which14
which is neither good14
a knowledge of the14
that he who has14
the rule of the14
they ought to be14
this is true of14
the love of the14
he is able to14
there is the same14
in the sense of14
things which are not14
as they are termed14
in the interior of14
you did not know14
the author of the14
which is given by14
the same time he14
in the next generation14
that there was a14
think that you are14
of the same age14
it is to be13
to both of them13
and first of all13
which we are now13
you and i have13
that there was no13
the master of the13
there seems to be13
this part of the13
you would say that13
there is a difficulty13
the first and second13
one that is not13
there is no use13
to the utmost of13
things are in motion13
as i said before13
of the world is13
of the origin of13
them to be the13
you were just now13
the souls of men13
which has been already13
nature of the soul13
of the platonic writings13
be a part of13
as i may say13
of not less than13
they may have been13
say that he is13
of the truth of13
a time when the13
shall be liable to13
the work of legislation13
is of two kinds13
as i said at13
is no such thing13
and there is another13
is not this the13
of which you speak13
the truth of what13
reason to suppose that13
by the art of13
and the other of13
the just and unjust13
of the human race13
according to the law13
and some of them13
is the best of13
but there is a13
the work of the13
the soul is a13
of the relation of13
he ought to be13
in order that they13
dear to the gods13
to the nature of13
in the same place13
in which it is13
but he is not13
we will say to13
the nature of things13
there was a time13
answer to the question13
is the knowledge of13
he would have been13
the class of the13
the director of education13
think that we have13
we must remember that13
far as it is13
if he be not13
want to know whether13
which i was just13
are not able to13
the motions of the13
that he is the13
in the hour of13
to take care of13
is a difficulty in13
that he who is13
that which is the13
of them may be13
and is not this13
were just now saying13
of the manner in13
not that which is13
have no need of13
and of the other13
of which we have13
the art of making13
as far as we13
the sophist and statesman13
the spirit of plato13
on behalf of the13
as you were saying13
as far as he13
and i should like13
that you will be13
let the law be13
when you speak of12
of all other things12
seems to me to12
the matter in another12
i believe that you12
they are not the12
with the view of12
the sphere of the12
of the human body12
of the law and12
the interior of the12
what he does not12
is one of those12
and the guardians of12
some of them are12
were we not saying12
of the genuineness of12
that there is any12
prior to the body12
to be the most12
that which has the12
of the third class12
the beginning of the12
and the other is12
part of the soul12
than in any other12
the case of a12
that the one is12
in the sphere of12
seem to you to12
the reason why the12
and this is true12
is to be a12
any one who likes12
have no difficulty in12
and that this is12
he who has the12
to be the case12
order that we may12
if i am to12
fifty years of age12
greatest number of votes12
at the commencement of12
you say is true12
if a man has12
the true nature of12
and does not the12
the constitution of the12
to say that he12
have the power of12
the doctrine of the12
some one were to12
if a person were12
soul of the world12
may be allowed to12
by him in the12
to give an account12
of the wardens of12
shall be able to12
one and the others12
to us in the12
the art of weaving12
i think that he12
there is no other12
to be in the12
were just now speaking12
the authority of the12
the sake of which12
the age of plato12
we may say that12
in the hope of12
i think that there12
there shall be a12
the republic and the12
do you mean that12
in the process of12
is prior to the12
to speak the truth12
to me to have12
the will of the12
who are to be12
he is willing to12
the consent of the12
in the laws of12
i will try to12
others than the one12
in the world of12
thirty years of age12
all things are in12
that there are many12
the reason is that12
the soul which has12
of the soul which12
may or may not12
said to be the12
part of the dialogue12
the order of nature12
the image of the12
for the first time12
to be the greatest12
there is to be12
turn out to be12
is other than the12
the subject of the12
the consideration of the12
let me tell you12
is as good as12
he would like to12
in a fit of12
in relation to one12
the whole of the12
that you would tell12
to him who has12
the sun and moon12
the cause of all12
and is there not12
and which is the12
that there is such12
greater or less than12
is no use in12
of which i am12
not say that the12
is the greatest of12
and i believe that12
is the sort of12
at the approach of11
there is a difference11
i fear that i11
has been shown to11
the fruits of the11
if he were to11
there is no difference11
and this may be11
in a manner which11
the point at which11
that which he knows11
the nature of a11
any more than the11
the soul which is11
by any one who11
have a knowledge of11
there must be a11
than that of the11
say that you are11
if any one is11
is far from being11
when we say that11
are to be the11
in the pursuit of11
who are able to11
give an account of11
there ought to be11
arrive at the conclusion11
the same way that11
which is in the11
this is the way11
to get rid of11
there shall be no11
he who is of11
when a man has11
in what you say11
it is difficult to11
let us return to11
there would have been11
that seems to be11
that they should be11
a few of the11
the next of kin11
on the same principle11
the same as that11
in which there is11
and do you not11
is the result of11
in the administration of11
as they are called11
soul is a harmony11
no reason to suppose11
the finite and infinite11
the composition of the11
we are unable to11
is of the same11
the soul of man11
of them to be11
the light of the11
and if a person11
we arrive at the11
and if there be11
i see that you11
seems to be a11
courses of the soul11
and of the world11
of which he has11
of the being of11
the nature of knowledge11
arise out of the11
in this way the11
may be described as11
if there were no11
a man of sense11
and does not know11
do not as yet11
and by reason of11
and not of the11
do you not agree11
who is not a11
i am ready to11
and those who have11
but this is not11
is a great deal11
and i thought that11
out of which the11
in relation to itself11
the inhabitants of the11
of the same sort11
which have to do11
not the art of11
shall be allowed to11
have nothing to do11
and will not the11
but what do you11
say that there is11
and all the other11
in the same case11
in the hands of11
is by no means11
those who do not11
by the ancients themselves11
who knows how to11
and will not be11
be of the same11
as they appear to11
in the practice of11
existence of the soul11
who is able to11
those who say that11
law be as follows11
as well as by11
he is going to11
the character of a11
the very opposite of11
and the nature of11
if he be convicted11
as far as the11
to be derived from11
under the name of11
and all of them11
by those who are11
the best and noblest11
do you imagine that11
a man ought to11
the nature of piety11
may be truly called11
i am of opinion11
in the formation of11
there is a third11
all of them are11
the law shall be11
point of view of11
we shall not be11
should like to hear11
and that there is11
who have the greatest11
which we have been11
other dialogues of plato11
that he has no11
in the opinion of11
that a man may11
which are concerned with11
let me put the11
you not see that11
into the mouth of11
think that i am11
and that is the11
we must endeavour to11
one which is not11
i was saying before11
there be such a11
is held to be11
there could be no11
a former state of11
is he who has11
same and the other11
older or younger than11
older and younger than11
be other than the11
of which you are11
we are able to11
was a time when11
inclined to think that11
be of good cheer11
get the better of11
by the light of10
the body to the10
and he who does10
by them to be10
and the wardens of10
tell me whether you10
the same age with10
for i think that10
the principle of the10
and is not that10
by the name of10
the point of view10
and you must not10
in saying that the10
will be found to10
all that relates to10
parts of the body10
is dear to the10
far as they can10
eldest guardians of the10
that which has no10
in the republic and10
been shown to be10
are made up of10
in a certain sense10
of the dialogue is10
he shall not be10
to them in the10
and there is the10
be determined by the10
we are compelled to10
not to be regarded10
of the good and10
i believe that he10
what you were saying10
and when he has10
in the infancy of10
who is to be10
i ought not to10
by him to be10
you to tell me10
under the dominion of10
have the greatest number10
for the good of10
there is nothing which10
the general name of10
to be the only10
of all these things10
seems to be the10
be divided into two10
and there shall be10
he knows and perceives10
they were to be10
than thirty years of10
the business of the10
of the history of10
what are we to10
appear to be the10
the work of a10
i should not like10
and he who would10
in the likeness of10
that there is an10
of the dialogues of10
be said of the10
is in a manner10
in the sophist and10
not know how to10
and he is the10
the opposite of what10
would appear to be10
more than any other10
is the way in10
may we not say10
am sure that you10
to each of them10
are supposed to be10
be summed up as10
the ruler of the10
what you do not10
takes the form of10
to know what is10
think that he is10
but there is another10
takes the place of10
of socrates and plato10
be no difficulty in10
the analogy of the10
the likeness of the10
let any one who10
divided into two parts10
is better than the10
the warp and the10
he will not be10
the others than the10
that is quite true10
are the best of10
and are not the10
he did not know10
there is no need10
me to be a10
the property of the10
that we ought to10
the borders of the10
for the use of10
and may we not10
to be that which10
he seems to be10
in the description of10
intercourse with one another10
and all other things10
that you are not10
the happiness of mankind10
the law be as10
is the use of10
matter in another way10
me to be the10
that you do not10
in the power of10
man is the measure10
what do you refer10
would like to have10
the desire of the10
be distinguished from the10
the amount of the10
in respect of the10
will be sure to10
no man of sense10
be separated from the10
to the level of10
of a part of10
but he does not10
summed up as follows10
sixty years of age10
and out of them10
which we are speaking10
shall not be allowed10
the life of the10
and would you say10
the nature of virtue10
to be what he10
of the immortality of10
in a sort of10
but if this is10
shall be compelled to10
to those who have10
to the world below10
but the art of10
the one is the10
be got rid of10
to one another and10
to themselves and to10
the islands of the10
truly said to be10
shall be the same10
it is better to10
will do as you10
to any one who10
that he may be10
they are no longer10
is the power of10
nature of the other10
at a time when10
the greatest and most10
to be in a10
that we had better10
that i do not10
the being of not10
appears to be true10
of the dead man10
if they do not10
you do not understand10
did we not say10
which is the same10
differ from one another10
that this was the10
by rules of art10
he seems to have10
is due to the10
and this is what10
to be better than10
which we do not10
of the soul to10
do not suppose that10
the best and most10
to what do you10
which is called the10
that which he has10
us do as you10
if he had been10
does not admit of10
warp and the woof10
of the doctrine of10
or any one else10
any one of them10
you think that i10
other writings of plato10
of opinion that the10
that of which he10
who have the care10
but if they are10
and if i am9
do not understand you9
is not this a9
and the absence of9
under the impression that9
into the light of9
are of two kinds9
that will be the9
the level of the9
the movement of the9
in the republic he9
as a sort of9
with the help of9
there are some who9
all things which have9
which is called by9
that is a very9
a view to war9
in which we are9
which i do not9
the first part of9
out of the earth9
will not be the9
in his right mind9
be able to tell9
in a similar spirit9
by which they are9
the art of persuasion9
there should be a9
and in the other9
that is my opinion9
is the beginning of9
but i wish that9
a figure of speech9
and if there are9
you will allow me9
any one who pleases9
the hour of danger9
one point of view9
let us suppose that9
you will be able9
in the act of9
and in which the9
think that we had9
take the case of9
there is only one9
which is dear to9
the best of all9
the meaning of this9
to what are you9
in all these cases9
and let there be9
not think that i9
is the reverse of9
from another point of9
in the character of9
seems to have been9
of eating and drinking9
and when he had9
of the heavenly bodies9
what i was saying9
which appears to be9
in the phaedrus and9
if this be true9
why do you not9
the whole number of9
and do you know9
of the world below9
the day before yesterday9
that there is one9
in the same sense9
and the other to9
if they are to9
him to be the9
but if any one9
the part of the9
and now i will9
that i am a9
of the world as9
neither more nor less9
a little while ago9
beyond the limits of9
the good and evil9
you would admit that9
the art of measurement9
is the expression of9
as a part of9
the necessaries of life9
suppose a person to9
within the limits of9
which i have been9
no part in the9
there is a further9
the procreation of children9
the soul from the9
of any of the9
the children of the9
to take part in9
in the contemplation of9
for those who are9
thing which he does9
one of the most9
may be able to9
of meats and drinks9
would he not be9
in ancient and modern9
the hands of the9
to say that a9
out of one another9
the order in which9
will not be able9
the knowledge of what9
and when you have9
is in a state9
anything of that sort9
of the rest of9
of which i have9
that which he does9
and may be compared9
that you will not9
he shall be punished9
appears to be a9
that of which the9
and of all other9
that the gods are9
for this is the9
that you did not9
as has been already9
other than the others9
is akin to the9
his father and mother9
these are to be9
ought to be a9
if i remember rightly9
do you agree with9
you and i will9
the giver of the9
ought to be the9
to be the true9
how would you answer9
is most likely to9
the world in general9
i will do my9
and there are other9
the voluntary and involuntary9
if there had been9
the goods of the9
that in which he9
the things of which9
in the treatment of9
of men and women9
the offspring of the9
when we speak of9
follow next in order9
each of them is9
ask you a question9
an example of the9
he who is not9
as time went on9
to be aware that9
the use of words9
is the subject of9
say that there are9
odd and even numbers9
of the platonic dialogues9
that they might be9
and the other the9
any more than he9
there is a natural9
a certain degree of9
the division of the9
there are no teachers9
on the one hand9
and the things which9
you not think that9
be in the same9
do not know how9
and if there were9
as in the phaedrus9
there is no real9
far as he is9
we may remark that9
this is not the9
like the rest of9
of things which are9
and therefore i will9
in all sorts of9
should be allowed to9
that to do is9
book of the republic9
does not know what9
if we are to9
and therefore we must9
the right way of9
i believe that i9
have a difficulty in9
is not that which9
that there can be9
that they have no9
forty years of age9
a good deal of9
the parts of a9
who do not know9
the explanation of the9
do you not think9
into and out of9
the law of the9
the other dialogues of9
the aim of the9
let us do as9
to be distinguished from9
we seem to have9
and yet there is9
a place in the9
in all of them9
or at any rate9
is the enemy of9
there may have been9
it is true that9
not to be taken9
you not say that9
i am speaking of9
shall be put to9
if he is to9
less than thirty years9
suppose that there is9
has no share in9
are more likely to9
in which they have9
with the consent of9
to the class of9
the science of the9
me put the matter9
which may be compared9
hardly be said to9
all manner of ways9
in any other way9
by a sort of9
of all time and9
is another thing which9
i suppose that i9
should be able to9
of the mind which9
which there is a9
to be the first9
of the highest class9
that i may be9
order that they may9
so far as it9
the just and the9
which are to be9
side by side with9
what is that which9
the fairest and best9
there is a certain9
the best of the9
of gold and silver9
of such a nature9
is it to be9
is relative to the9
there is a similar9
is apt to be9
if they had been9
these and the like9
the idea that they9
that there is nothing9
that those who are9
he who is to9
the minds of the9
the whole art of9
am of opinion that9
some one who is9
to the rest of9
is the same with9
say that he who9
or in any way9
say the same of9
as the art of9
in such a way9
at the matter in9
the improvement of the9
we speak of the9
not in the same9
and on the same9
that there may be9
or of the same9
of gods and men9
of the laws of9
take the place of9
for the truth is9
if you would rather9
in the attempt to9
that something of the9
end of the dialogue9
the art which is9
are very far from9
the wisest of men9
does not know the9
than that which is9
come to an understanding9
never in the same9
on account of the9
means to say that9
be better able to9
that he has been9
the mouth of the9
any more than of9
the relations of the9
the funeral oration of9
more than half the9
to him to be9
friend of the good9
the generation of the9
in the same state9
which i am about9
do not understand the9
to go to the9
am inclined to think9
admit that there is9
to the knowledge of8
if he did not8
become older or younger8
history of the human8
that which is done8
when he is in8
as well as men8
the tale of the8
one who is not8
the other writings of8
of the same thing8
whether you agree with8
for i am not8
the idea that the8
any one else who8
the inference is that8
of pleasure and wisdom8
former state of existence8
fruits of the earth8
of fighting in armour8
shall be as follows8
by the guardians of8
never be able to8
in the neighbourhood of8
and what are the8
let us see whether8
and this is not8
is for the sake8
i have told you8
in the soul of8
there appears to be8
nature of the universe8
tell you what i8
is proved by the8
he who has learned8
the general spirit of8
which he has not8
and yet they are8
who is willing to8
apollo and the muses8
and the same holds8
who thinks that he8
is the origin of8
seem to me to8
which arises out of8
elements out of which8
any other sort of8
the nature of justice8
as you will remember8
not to be found8
that there are some8
the nature of god8
must we forget that8
are of the same8
of the island of8
what is the name8
if there were any8
both like and unlike8
that there are three8
the better of the8
to think that there8
the reversal of the8
them with one another8
does not appear to8
benjamin jowett introduction and8
ought to have been8
in the republic the8
and therefore i must8
does not the same8
the affections of the8
enough has been said8
the house of the8
that there are other8
and if he were8
be attributed to the8
and if he do8
in their own nature8
than to suffer injustice8
is to be regarded8
we ought not to8
is the son of8
we shall be right8
is there not a8
and do we not8
get rid of the8
are you going to8
let there be a8
those who have no8
all other things are8
the manner of their8
he shall pay a8
and for the sake8
that the nature of8
do not agree with8
be far wrong in8
by the side of8
have not as yet8
any of these things8
this is what i8
that he should be8
not for the sake8
would have been no8
by the grace of8
that they will be8
say that all things8
that it is the8
of the finite and8
you must not be8
and i dare say8
is the name of8
they are not to8
less than fifty years8
is found in the8
one another in the8
let this be the8
of the eleatic philosophy8
in the absence of8
of plato in the8
that he must be8
seasons of the year8
to be the truth8
at athens and in8
and the one is8
if you will allow8
why do you say8
in the nature of8
a thing which is8
be no doubt of8
ought to be very8
in speaking of the8
let us speak of8
the nature of that8
creation of the world8
do what he likes8
in what i am8
if any of them8
i was going to8
and if we are8
there are many other8
the revolutions of the8
of the nocturnal council8
and would you not8
to those who are8
the possession of the8
that we are not8
put into the mouth8
they ought not to8
when the question is8
not a part of8
and each of them8
we are speaking of8
by the analogy of8
to say to you8
you would not be8
to the measure of8
which is the opposite8
i will do as8
in the management of8
placed side by side8
but he who has8
which can only be8
should like to ask8
or shall we say8
those who are in8
as we have described8
in the election of8
the destruction of the8
and where there is8
is the way to8
far as he can8
the administration of justice8
as if he had8
at the same moment8
we affirm to be8
may be illustrated by8
names of the gods8
all sorts of ways8
let there be no8
if you want to8
and any one who8
i cannot help thinking8
thought to be the8
must be supposed to8
is admitted to be8
is good for anything8
jowett introduction and analysis8
art of fighting in8
a court of law8
the quality of vision8
and of which the8
we may observe that8
are and are not8
that which is in8
but let me ask8
but they do not8
the use of them8
which they do not8
i am disposed to8
he is compelled to8
are of opinion that8
and therefore he is8
suppose that some one8
the court of the8
you say that you8
in and out of8
it is clear that8
are the sort of8
the characters of men8
of the fourth class8
ought we not to8
i am inclined to8
think that there are8
this will be the8
on the authority of8
then he who is8
be such a thing8
which has passed away8
the soul of a8
to the human mind8
more than in the8
i am right in8
an art at all8
be found in the8
the opinions of men8
if any of the8
which are contained in8
is an element of8
which was to be8
to be sure i8
of the human soul8
of the second class8
the most important of8
and may not the8
the meaning of them8
to know the nature8
let us go back8
that the body is8
the name of plato8
porch of the king8
virtue cannot be taught8
do you say to8
not be far wrong8
way in which the8
you and i are8
a man must be8
they would have been8
in one of the8
in order to avoid8
pleasure is to be8
we have to consider8
in some of the8
with a sort of8
and not to be8
with the rest of8
one of those who8
by the standard of8
but i think that8
that there should be8
the difference between them8
there is another point8
at some other time8
something of the kind8
that is very likely8
is that of which8
the influence of the8
he is said to8
this is the only8
answer to this question8
and then i shall8
can hardly be said8
and if this be8
shall be right in8
the king or statesman8
as well as i8
there was no such8
cannot do better than8
the rest of his8
the hand of the8
on the same spot8
may there not be8
and also of the8
the soul is prior8
those who are able8
is in accordance with8
of the writings of8
we are in the8
that there are no8
or he may be8
and also in the8
and what sort of8
to the idea of8
first of all to8
be able to follow8
of question and answer8
would not have been8
having regard to the8
speak of the same8
out of his own8
what they do not8
the same relation to8
if he be the8
of right and wrong8
has been already said8
they think that they8
of the kind is8
begin at the beginning8
partake of the one8
of the way of8
the same sort of8
do not say that8
you mean by the8
we not saying that8
the course of ages8
suppose that there are8
if you mean to8
is the same in8
his father or mother8
who are willing to8
when he speaks of8
to the best of8
should say that the8
what are you referring8
then that which is8
and not the other8
which is supposed to8
a city which is8
he ought to have8
that is very true8
is the science of8
and in what way8
the greatest happiness principle8
and did we not8
to the effect that8
then the one will8
which arise out of8
that there would be8
that he has a8
on the other side8
to explain to you8
should not like to8
be greater or less8
the food of the8
about the meaning of8
the treatment of the8
may be thought to8
he could not have8
what relates to the8
us proceed to the8
admit the existence of8
do you not know8
for they do not8
out of their own8
of which i was8
the question which i8
man of the world8
the presence of the8
to know all things8
not only of the8
you seem to me8
in the same relation8
from the point of8
there are two sorts8
of the soul and8
what is the use8
there is an element8
is capable of being8
of men and animals8
to be one of8
the sort of thing8
of justice and injustice8
of the human faculties8
the same in all8
we must not forget8
that what you say8
far as i am8
of the world in8
for the purposes of8
is the love of8
arising out of the8
to which we are8
of the world and8
that is my meaning8
what is the inference8
by the hand of8
the opposite of the8
that which is dear8
which has to be8
the porch of the8
that we should be8
sense of the word8
i should imagine that8
and those who are8
the service of the8
the laws of nature8
borders of the land8
of the king archon8
one of which is8
that i had better8
present to the mind8
is of the nature8
he be a slave8
he who knows the8
think that i can8
of piety and impiety8
called by the name8
and then you will8
will do my best8
to the improvement of8
for there are two8
who is guilty of8
book of the laws8
that he was a8
the first principles of8
i will ask you8
the conception of a8
in which the mind8
as we were just8
when compared with the8
is opposed to the8
the life of man8
he speaks of the8
the knowledge which is8
dealings with one another8
same as that of8
in the life of8
out of which they8
i cannot say that8
or the art of8
except in the case8
he is the most8
which of them is8
one another and to8
we say that we8
of all the rest8
that is my view8
about which we are8
his own doctrine of8
we shall be able8
the soul is the8
there is no greater8
go back to the7
things in the world7
it would be a7
the sake of them7
ask the same question7
there not be a7
are for the most7
not to have the7
pleasures and pains are7
you will not be7
the square of the7
the irony of socrates7
if i were to7
and he ought to7
have arrived at the7
possession of the good7
you ought not to7
that knowledge is perception7
in which he has7
is always in a7
different from that of7
that one of the7
can there be any7
in the house of7
far as we can7
to the creation of7
of what they are7
fourth century before christ7
in the earlier dialogues7
that we may not7
between the ages of7
that would be the7
these are the sort7
of which there is7
as much as he7
i said to him7
the first of them7
the idea of the7
and is able to7
of virtue and knowledge7
by plato in the7
the beautiful and the7
and there will be7
the first of these7
the best way of7
in the constitution of7
if we do not7
in a less degree7
in the direction of7
most likely to be7
do not deny that7
be at variance with7
every man ought to7
do as i say7
in the region of7
he is afraid of7
the world of sense7
the worst of all7
many of them are7
of time and space7
know and not know7
be given to the7
want to know what7
and the same is7
i suppose that he7
in any of the7
the first of the7
if you were to7
of fire and air7
for they are the7
the hands of a7
and if there is7
with reference to the7
of what i am7
to any of them7
he may be said7
let us consider the7
and the order of7
of the earth in7
of the country shall7
that of all the7
be no doubt that7
part of the whole7
of the idea of7
as far as this7
in a short time7
the other or diverse7
is supposed to have7
he is supposed to7
not an art at7
and there were many7
this point of view7
in all manner of7
the prize of virtue7
all in a moment7
to arrive at the7
were to ask you7
he shall be liable7
the nature of love7
which i am speaking7
if there were a7
of the same family7
of the soul after7
nor must we forget7
if we were to7
and did not know7
of the class of7
if there is no7
he is not in7
which is of the7
which ought to be7
when the body is7
what is good and7
that which we know7
in time of war7
of itself and of7
rest of the company7
you what is the7
of an age to7
take care of the7
nothing can be more7
take care of our7
in which there are7
the same kind of7
end of his life7
you have to say7
for we have already7
with one another and7
am afraid that i7
we may proceed to7
of the four elements7
might be expected to7
as there are two7
i do not mean7
the source of all7
the words of socrates7
first part of the7
in favour of the7
in the souls of7
by the wardens of7
the presence of evil7
we not suppose that7
neither is there any7
they seem to have7
is what i mean7
give the name of7
come down to us7
the question at issue7
the fourth century before7
the first principle of7
i believe that the7
in the philosophy of7
the sound of the7
that you are the7
the practice of the7
the strength of the7
the foundation of the7
is no need to7
in supposing that the7
of the same nature7
were just now mentioning7
and out of this7
and if he has7
thinks that he has7
you are aware that7
be compared to a7
other things which are7
in the beginning of7
to the islands of7
where three ways meet7
a portion of the7
can he think that7
be selected from the7
understand the meaning of7
to get the better7
should like to have7
of just and unjust7
on the ground that7
and what is not7
on the point of7
will say to him7
the allusion to the7
no share in the7
tell me what is7
think that they are7
those things which we7
shall pay a fine7
which we suppose to7
he knows to be7
supposed to be a7
you think that there7
to the things of7
he thinks that he7
of him who is7
as i am concerned7
that is what you7
in all other things7
analogy of the arts7
into the form of7
of that which he7
in courts of law7
and as to the7
that the souls of7
that he had been7
all that i have7
cannot be allowed to7
there is a want7
may be termed the7
nature of piety and7
and let this be7
is a want of7
one were to ask7
the pleasures and pains7
the government of the7
he appears to be7
the answer to the7
we must admit that7
of the other arts7
capable of being taught7
i must beg you7
the same and other7
the two kinds of7
or do not know7
any one of the7
that virtue can be7
to have the same7
the kind is true7
to be full of7
but what would you7
of fire and water7
among hellenes and barbarians7
is not in his7
communion with one another7
of mind and body7
of the relations of7
one part of the7
of the names of7
in a court of7
for if they had7
all things in common7
of socrates and of7
it would seem so7
and now let me7
is not in the7
what i am going7
point of view in7
which there is no7
him to be a7
but do you not7
in the first part7
the ideas of plato7
this shall be the7
and one of them7
master of the art7
in the belief that7
of the platonic philosophy7
to be of the7
and in the next7
the happiness of others7
be the cause of7
that i am the7
must of necessity be7
and i will answer7
the greater or less7
you say that they7
the picture of the7
and in the laws7
not the same be7
we were saying that7
he who is found7
if you have no7
the existence of a7
of pleasure or pain7
of the same mind7
be thought to be7
all his life long7
of a later age7
and the art which7
as good as possible7
is not a whole7
is confirmed by the7
dialogues of plato are7
is there any reason7
than fifty years of7
sort of thing which7
under the rule of7
it seems to me7
that i ought to7
in reference to the7
the ruin of the7
is produced by the7
in time of peace7
which has to do7
i know that you7
the circulation of the7
the preservation of the7
that i have been7
and there is one7
we think that we7
be the source of7
that he is in7
about the just and7
of the platonic ideas7
they are able to7
in what relates to7
i should say the7
to enquire into the7
in company with the7
the form of man7
and when we have7
are concerned with the7
that i should be7
you would agree with7
and in order to7
is the desire of7
the education of the7
not to speak of7
which is the greatest7
the things which he7
on the supposition that7
another and to the7
to the eye of7
by the power of7
women as well as7
i do not believe7
there is a good7
the same manner as7
a great part of7
and if you are7
he must be a7
the name of a7
the parts which are7
son of a king7
and the same of7
in a former state7
the name which is7
the comparison of the7
the god of strangers7
of either of them7
to which of the7
the meaning of a7
the reason why i7
motion of the same7
the sake of something7
us return to the7
the good and wise7
in which we have7
agree with me in7
hateful to the gods7
of the body which7
he has no knowledge7
the opposite of this7
the same be said7
how can any one7
as might be expected7
was not to be7
soul is prior to7
then we shall be7
to him in the7
to be more than7
the genuineness of ancient7
and we must not7
the image of a7
a great deal more7
in the following terms7
the traditions of the7
and with a view7
there must also be7
at the matter thus7
which is assigned to7
a part of a7
he would not have7
circulation of the blood7
when i said that7
are neither good nor7
of the great king7
shall we say of7
and to one another7
may we not suppose7
of the just and7
the answer to this7
at such a time7
is the best and7
arrived at the conclusion7
if some one were7
all the rest of7
for we are not7
is not at all7
of any of them7
in the highest degree7
to the end of7
to be compared with7
in the attainment of7
after the battle of7
what he ought to7
were you not saying7
and he is not7
are a few of7
which we have already7
things of the soul7
in both of them7
in the second degree7
to be a great7
shall be selected from7
of them will be7
understand the nature of7
the man who is7
and this will be7
acknowledged by us to7
and then he will7
of the mind to7
the surface of the7
it seems to be7
the whole nature of7
and this was the7
and therefore there is7
not know that which7
deny the existence of7
not in his right7
at the sight of7
is a good deal7
the phaedrus and symposium7
another thing which he7
art of the pilot7
cannot be supposed to7
in the same degree7
are likely to be7
younger than the others7
that is not the7
of the sun and7
but is there any7
take up arms against7
does not know and7
the sophist and the7
is a science of7
is by far the7
of the order of7
which he knows and7
as well as for7
for the same reason7
the origin of language7
but there is also7
i understand you to7
in addition to the7
of one of the7
of them shall be7
we are in a7
a point of view7
and that he who7
the commencement of the7
like that of the7
rest of the body7
if you are not7
if there be a7
is called by the7
to the sphere of7
and let him who7
and have we not7
to the expression of7
in the face of7
the feeling of the7
that virtue is knowledge7
is at variance with7
of any one of7
may seem to be7
which he attributes to7
then there is no7
if there is a7
i would rather have7
the nature of language7
to the house of7
their relation to one7
under the control of7
that is the reason7
the rest of them7
and i would have7
not less than thirty7
admitted to be the7
difficulty in seeing that7
there is a danger7
to the happiness of7
the voice of the7
if you will only7
the life of a7
that you have never7
to the class which7
do not see that7
the better for the7
the sun and the7
and there may be7
seems to be true7
the soul to the7
in comparison with the7
when i was a7
the definition of the7
to say that you7
the structure of the7
say that you have7
the midst of the7
we take care of7
that is what we7
and we said that7
of the use of7
and one of the7
which is said to7
at the same instant7
and is there any7
he does not see7
man of sense will7
the laws which are7
be expected to be7
and what is that7
to the guardians of7
they seem to be7
every one of us7
the grace of god7
and those which are7
i perceive that you7
the days of his7
of the whole state7
he is speaking of7
the legislator ought to7
to the whole of7
think that i have7
that to which the7
be too much for7
formed out of the7
and all sorts of7
turns out to be7
if we say that7
then now let us7
we shall find that7
of the body and7
is the aim of7
the rotation of the7
the use of arms7
as they ought to7
do not admit of7