This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
| identifier | question |
|---|---|
| A26746 | A right Nicodemus temper, which stumbles at Divine Truths only with an — How can these things be? |
| A26746 | And strange it is they should always be in the right, and yet be always condemned for it? |
| A26746 | But after all this, What ground hath this Letter for his Confidence? |
| A26746 | But let old Theodotion, and Symmachus be what they will, what is the Glory of having these two on their side, when the whole Church was against them? |
| A26746 | But you will say then, where, or how doth this Creed teach the Divinity of the Holy Ghost? |
| A26746 | But you will say, what is the reason then, we are not commanded to pray expresly and particularly to the Holy Ghost, as we are to God? |
| A26746 | For did these Authors recite this Creed, yet how doth this prove the Apostolical Composure of it? |
| A26746 | For who knows not the Writings of Irenaeus, Melito,& c in which Christ is set forth as both God and Man? |
| A26746 | Jesus said — thou shalt not Tempt the Lord thy God? |
| A26746 | Now here is a Priority of Order or Prace; but where is that of Time and Power? |
| A26746 | That he ascended, what is it, but that he descended first? |
| A26746 | This is evident from Joshua; for c. 5. v. 13. he sees a Man with a drawn Sword, and ▪ asks, Who he was for? |
| A26746 | Where have ye laid him? |
| A26746 | Where is Abel thy Brother, doth prove that God knew not what was become of him? |
| A26746 | Why callest thou me Good? |
| A26746 | Why not God''s Son, since the Scriptures so often call him so? |
| A26746 | Why one of these Angels may not be the Son of God, as well as these three Men be Angels? |
| A26746 | Will ye accept his Person? |
| A26746 | Will ye speak wickedly for God? |
| A26746 | Will ye speak wickedly for God? |
| A26746 | and talk deceitfully for him? |
| A26746 | as Man, or as God? |
| A26746 | l. 1. if the Holy Ghost be not God, Tì 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 ▪ Why do Men believe the H. Ghost? |
| A26746 | — Will ye accept his Person? |
| A26746 | 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 — who hath heard such things as these? |
| A52606 | ( Now that he ascended, what is it, but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the Earth? |
| A52606 | 4. Who hath ascended up into Heaven, — who hath established all the Ends of the Earth? |
| A52606 | And again, Is not this he that destroyed them that called on this Name in Jerusalem? |
| A52606 | And thou, Lord, in the Beginning hast laid the Foundation of the Earth; — but to which of the Angels said he at any time, Sit on my right Hand? |
| A52606 | And, Is not this he that destroyed them that called on this Name in Jerusalem? |
| A52606 | And, Is not this he that destroyed them who name this Name in Jerusalem? |
| A52606 | And, Is not this he, that destroyed them who are called by this Name in Jerusalem? |
| A52606 | Are these things Persons? |
| A52606 | But did Superstition( say the Socinians) stop here? |
| A52606 | But how can Christians with Satisfaction to their Consciences punish such a Man? |
| A52606 | But was not the Son also with the Holy Ghost, and is not he too( according to the Trinitarians) God, or a God? |
| A52606 | But what Principle more clear both in Reason and Scripture than this, that there is but one God, or that God is one? |
| A52606 | But what sense can the Trinitarians make of these things? |
| A52606 | But where in Scripture is the Word called God the Son? |
| A52606 | Do not Trinitarians absolutely disallow, as false and Heretical, these Forms of Speech, though defended by the Distinction of the two Natures? |
| A52606 | For one Instance, how many express Texts ascribe Parts and Members, Affections and Passions, Shape and Figure, Place and Circumscription to God? |
| A52606 | For what other help could that Nature need, which was one Person with( as they speak) God the Son; and in which God the Son did personally dwell? |
| A52606 | How comes this to be again repeated? |
| A52606 | If not, how can it be so now? |
| A52606 | Shall we now infer, that the Disciples and Ministers of Christ, are Christ: nay, are him also that sent Christ, namely God? |
| A52606 | The Spirit that guided the Apostles into all Truth, was it not the meer Inspiration of God? |
| A52606 | They searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so? |
| A52606 | Vnto what then were ye baptized? |
| A52606 | Was number in those times an Argument of Truth? |
| A52606 | What hinders but that they may believe all the Transformations in the Metamorphosis of Ovid? |
| A52606 | What shall we do here? |
| A52606 | Where have ye laid him? |
| A52606 | Whither shall I go from thy Spirit? |
| A52606 | Who does not now see, that to be baptized unto, and in the Name of Christ, or any other Person or thing, are used as equivalent terms? |
| A52606 | Why callest thou me good? |
| A52606 | Why callest thou me good? |
| A52606 | Why hath Satan filled thine Heart, to lie to the Holy Ghost? |
| A52606 | Will ye speak wickedly for God? |
| A52606 | they say the Spirit is a Person and God: did God receive and assume the Shape of a Dove, that is, of a Brute? |
| A52606 | was the Word the Father? |
| A52606 | what is his Name, and what is his Son''s Name? |
| A52606 | why then do they expect, that their Adversaries in this Controversy, should admit their Answers which are founded on the same, and no other Defence? |
| A52606 | — Is not this he, that destroyed them which called on this Nome( Christ''s Name) in Jerusalem? |
| A52606 | — Will ye accept his Person? |
| A40444 | 242, That it was matter of free choice: And have I not said the same? |
| A40444 | 242. you say, That that proves his Pre- existence: And I grant it you: And what, Sir, is not this agreeable to my Hypothesis? |
| A40444 | 43, that I am asham''d to see''t: What, Sir, do you think they would have called the greatest Council that ever was, if they had design''d a tricking? |
| A40444 | 8. and the Context directs? |
| A40444 | : 1687?] |
| A40444 | And are we not bound to have a Charity for their Errour? |
| A40444 | And if not, how can it be an open and barefac''d Idolatry? |
| A40444 | And is not the other Expression adequate to both Hypothesis alike? |
| A40444 | And pray, Sir, where are the Absurdities and Contradictions of these things? |
| A40444 | And pray, Sir, why is not Hatred a Person in God, as well as Love? |
| A40444 | And what Men said of him? |
| A40444 | And what is it nothing to Christianity, that we have several degrees of Glory as an Encouragement, set in our prospect and search above the Heathen? |
| A40444 | And what, Sir, do these Wiles look as from God? |
| A40444 | And what, Sir, does this look, as if there was a coequality to be represented? |
| A40444 | And what, Sir, is not this Insolence? |
| A40444 | And what, Sir, was it out of Charity that they forbore to call the Trinitarians Hereticks? |
| A40444 | And what? |
| A40444 | And who shall deny you this Honour? |
| A40444 | But methinks I hear you object to me, What Faith is necessary then, if this be not? |
| A40444 | But what benefit will these Texts do you? |
| A40444 | But what need I repeat more of these proofs? |
| A40444 | But you say, This is a Mystery: And pray who has authoris''d it for one? |
| A40444 | But you''ll say, here is some colour for the Trinity: And what, is there not then as much sor Transubstantiation? |
| A40444 | Can any thing under infinite Wisdom Rule the World? |
| A40444 | Can here be any pretence then that the Godhead suffer''d? |
| A40444 | Does Baptism shew Worship? |
| A40444 | Does not the Sun do the same thing in the Sensible, and Vegetable World? |
| A40444 | Give me leave to advise you a little, Sir, if you are resolv''d to follow Tradition: Be not partial in it: Why should you act by halves? |
| A40444 | If so, why may not my Construction of it, agreeable to Scripture- Interpretation, be as good as yours? |
| A40444 | Is it that you think to storm and brave us out of our Cause; or that you are sure you only are in the right? |
| A40444 | Is not the whole Foundation of your Argument rotten? |
| A40444 | Is this clear like a heavenly Truth? |
| A40444 | No, we''ll turn the havock of the first Commandment justly, in Contradictions upon you; we need not ask with Nicodemus, How can these things be? |
| A40444 | Not that we beg it neither: But is it generous, first to fetter a Man, and then challenge him? |
| A40444 | Or are you resolv''d to trust more to the Council of Nice, because not so many? |
| A40444 | Or were the Copy of it lost, who would be able exactly to hammer it out? |
| A40444 | Or what, Sir, is your Eye evil, because God is good? |
| A40444 | Or would you have him damn them to support your Hypothesis? |
| A40444 | Page 153, you say, We ought not to force the Scriptures to preconceiv''d Notions: But what? |
| A40444 | Pray who can agree in this Mystery? |
| A40444 | Pray, Sir, what is it you mean by these Triumphs? |
| A40444 | That Faith which you say requires both Forehead, and Forgery to deny it, page 44, when you should say to maintain it? |
| A40444 | That at the Name of Jesus, every knee shall bow — and that every tongue shall confess,( But what?) |
| A40444 | That the son of man hath power on earth, to forgive sins: But what then? |
| A40444 | What looks more impertinent and absurd? |
| A40444 | What shall I say? |
| A40444 | What shall a meer Man be exalted above Angels? |
| A40444 | What wo nt you make us no allowances in your Thoughts? |
| A40444 | What, a Coequal? |
| A40444 | Would you have God a Devil, create Men meerly for Damnation? |
| A40444 | Yes surely, if he were first above them, and laid aside his Being only for a time, and in obedience to his God: And what say you? |
| A40444 | Yes surely; But if they are, why do they stille us, and our Books, is it not that they fear our Truths? |
| A40444 | You had as good say, she has no concern in Language; And pray in what has she more? |
| A40444 | is not this Mystery such? |
| A40444 | or that if you had the worst Cause, you could defend it well? |
| A40444 | s.n.,[ London? |
| A23823 | 22, 23, 24. was it too hot, or to heavy for him? |
| A23823 | And now I appeal to any Reader, whether this be an absurd Sense? |
| A23823 | And what then; if some Learned Jews have spoken non- sense, must we speak non- sense too? |
| A23823 | And why then can not the Lamb be said to be slain from the beginning of the World, meerly because God had certainly decreed it should be so? |
| A23823 | Are not Angels in Scripture called Sons of God? |
| A23823 | Are then the Miracles of Christ, and of his Apostles, nothing? |
| A23823 | Because Christ''s Sufferings have been remunerated with a transcendent Glory; must they not be accounted Humility, but Pride? |
| A23823 | Because He voluntarily condescends below the Dignity of his Nature; does He forfeit the Dignity of his Nature? |
| A23823 | Besides, how can it be said here, that the Supream God made himself of no Reputation? |
| A23823 | But I ask, is not the Son equal to the Father, both in Energy and Authority? |
| A23823 | But I pray, what is the meaning of this? |
| A23823 | But do not Singular Pronouns denote Singular Persons, in all Languages? |
| A23823 | But does it follow from thence, that such a Knowledg is not from Revelation? |
| A23823 | But has not the Historian produced such a Text? |
| A23823 | But how can this be the same Individual Act? |
| A23823 | But how comes this Love of God to be called a Mystery still? |
| A23823 | But how has he perverted the first Verse of St. John''s Revelations? |
| A23823 | But if so; How can the Son be that one God, the Father? |
| A23823 | But is not the Sense which the Author would put upon this place, both absurd and inconsistent? |
| A23823 | But is this Impudence, to say, Transubstantiation can not be contained in Scripture, because it implies a Contradiction? |
| A23823 | But must he that is the Son of God, be also by Nature God? |
| A23823 | But of whom can the true God receive, either Knowledg, or Authority to dispense it? |
| A23823 | But saith the Author, A modest Man would first inquire whether it be in Scripture or not? |
| A23823 | But suppose those early Sacrifices were an Institution, does it follow from thence, that they were instituted to be Types of the Sacrifice of Christ? |
| A23823 | But was not the Son also with the Holy Ghost, and is not he too( according to Trinitarians) God, or a God? |
| A23823 | But what Principle of natural Reason does it contradict? |
| A23823 | But what is the meaning of all this? |
| A23823 | But what then? |
| A23823 | But what then? |
| A23823 | But what then? |
| A23823 | But where in Scripture, says he, is the Word called God the the Son? |
| A23823 | But where is the Holy Ghost called God in Scripture? |
| A23823 | But why not? |
| A23823 | But why should the Temple be a Figure of Christ''s Body, rather than the Ark? |
| A23823 | But why so? |
| A23823 | But why, I pray, does it not prove that, he is not one God with the Father? |
| A23823 | But, How( saith the Historian) can in the Beginning, be from all Eternity? |
| A23823 | But, I say, how can God be called the Head of Christ, in such a Sense? |
| A23823 | But, what if all the Power Christ is invested with, is as Head of the Church? |
| A23823 | Can all this be ascribed to the Supream God? |
| A23823 | Can any Man know any thing but by his inherent Personal Knowledg? |
| A23823 | Can he that invokes, and he that is invoked, be one and the same Being? |
| A23823 | Can sending another, and giving one''s self, be one and the same Act? |
| A23823 | Could any thing be said more absurd and ridiculous? |
| A23823 | Does Reason tell us, that Three Divine Persons can not be one God? |
| A23823 | Does he mean, that he has found somewhere in Scripture in plain and express Words, that there are Three Persons in one Divine Nature or Godhead? |
| A23823 | Does it follow from thence, that the Socinian Doctrine ridicules the Christian Religion? |
| A23823 | Does not the Scripture mention Moses his Intercession with God; and that God was moved by his Intreaty? |
| A23823 | Does the Apostle make a distinction between his two Natures? |
| A23823 | Does the Holy Scripture plainly say; that there is but one God, yet there are Three Persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the Godhead? |
| A23823 | For if he intercedes with God, can he be that very God with whom he intercedes? |
| A23823 | For the Spirit of God must be in God, as the Spirit of a Man is in a Man? |
| A23823 | Furthermore, how can we forbear conceiving Two Gods, according to this Hypothesis? |
| A23823 | Has the Doctor found any where in Scripture, that the Son is a Personal Subsisting, but Reflex Image of his Father''s Wisdom? |
| A23823 | He therefore that ministreth to you the Spirit, and worketh Miracles among you; doth he it by the Works of the Law, or by the hearing of Faith? |
| A23823 | How did he become Poor, says he, who was never Rich? |
| A23823 | How does he prove it? |
| A23823 | How is he only said, to love the World; for the Son and Holy Ghost love it as well as the Father? |
| A23823 | How so? |
| A23823 | How so? |
| A23823 | How so? |
| A23823 | How then can he be said to be sent by his Father, to receive his Commands, and to seek his Glory? |
| A23823 | I answer; Where have you found in Scripture, that Christ is God as well as Man? |
| A23823 | I appeal to the Reader, whether this be not a mear denial of the Difficulty, not an Explication or a Solution of it? |
| A23823 | I come in the second place to examine; Whether the Trinity be well grounded in Scripture? |
| A23823 | I hope it may be said of a Man inlightned by Revelation, that he knows, as well as of any other? |
| A23823 | If Christ made this Revelation, because he is God, how is it said to be given to him, which can in no sense agree to him who is true God? |
| A23823 | If by God be meant the Father only; How comes the Father to ingross here the Title of God, to the Exclusion of the Son and the Holy Ghost? |
| A23823 | If this Inspiration be without God, in the Creatures who are inspired by him; how is it the Spirit of God? |
| A23823 | If you ask him, why? |
| A23823 | If you ask them, how they can avoid admitting a Plurality of Gods? |
| A23823 | In a Word, being the Author of this New Evangelical Creation, ca n''t He also be the First- born of every New Evangelical Creature? |
| A23823 | In a word( as the Historian speaks) How comes the Father to ingross here the Title of God, to the exclusion of the Holy Ghost? |
| A23823 | Indeed Three are there mentioned; the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost: but how came Men to fancy, that they Three are but One God? |
| A23823 | Indeed, how could we? |
| A23823 | Is Christ''s Resurrection no Proof, or but a weak one, of his being sent by God, and the truth of his Message? |
| A23823 | Is an Ironical Answer sufficient, to confute a good and a strong Argument? |
| A23823 | Is it all one, to worship Christ by God''s Appointment, and to worship False Gods and( Apocryphal) Saints, without any Warrant from God? |
| A23823 | Is it not a plain Contradiction to the Apostle? |
| A23823 | Is it not absurd and senseless to say, That the Father signifies also the Son and Holy Ghost, in those very Texts where he is distinguished from them? |
| A23823 | Is it possible, Men should put such a trifling sense on the words of an Apostle? |
| A23823 | Is not he, to whom Christ here directs his Prayer, called God? |
| A23823 | Is not this Explication clear, and agreeable to the Scope of the Sacred Writer? |
| A23823 | Is not this an admirable Argument, which consists only in an Interrogation, and in a meer denial of the difficulty proposed in the Objection? |
| A23823 | Is this a direct Confutation? |
| A23823 | Lastly, If our Lord Christ were himself God, how could any command him? |
| A23823 | Must we account as nothing, the Purity of the Gospel, and its swift Propagation thrô the whole World? |
| A23823 | My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? |
| A23823 | Now if it be so; how can the Father be said to be greater than the Son, who is as great as himself? |
| A23823 | Now what does the Author mean by the plain and express Authority of Revelation? |
| A23823 | Now what is a Contradiction, if this be not, to say that Christ created them, and that the Father set him far above them? |
| A23823 | Now where is the Fallacy, but in the Author''s Answer? |
| A23823 | Now who should not scruple an Opinion, perfectly parallel with Transubstantiation; and equally fruitful in Incongruities and Contradictions? |
| A23823 | Or does our Saviour say, that he calls his Body a Temple, because it was the Anti- type of the Temple of the Jews? |
| A23823 | Or was it impossible that the Trinity should creep into the Church, as well as several other false Opinions? |
| A23823 | Or were those Reformers so infallible, that they purged the Church from all Errors? |
| A23823 | Or why do we seek to make him greater than he ever said he was? |
| A23823 | Our Author adds, He might as well have asked, why the Sanctification of the Church is ascribed to the Spirit? |
| A23823 | Reason tells us, that Three Gods can not be One God; but does Reason tell us, that Three Divine Persons can not be One God? |
| A23823 | Shall we not call Humility what St. Paul calls so? |
| A23823 | Shall we trust Men, barely on their Word? |
| A23823 | This is a very hard Language; for who can fancy, that the Son of God should be God himself; and that before, should signify Eternity? |
| A23823 | To this our Author replies; But why does he confine this bowing the Knee to the last Judgment? |
| A23823 | Vnto what then were ye baptized? |
| A23823 | Was Adam by nature God? |
| A23823 | Was the Reformation so proper to Luther and Calvin,& c. that it ought no more to be thought of? |
| A23823 | Was the Temple at Jerusalem a Figure or Type of the Bodies of the Corinthians? |
| A23823 | Was the Word, i. e. was God the Son? |
| A23823 | Well then, if the Trinity implies no less Contradiction than Transubstantiation; why ca n''t we say, that it can not be contained in Scripture? |
| A23823 | What Man knoweth the things of a Man, save the Spirit of a Man which is in him? |
| A23823 | What Principle of natural Reason does it contradict? |
| A23823 | What Things? |
| A23823 | What follows from thence? |
| A23823 | What hope is there of convincing those, with whom the Father only shall not signify the Father only? |
| A23823 | What is more plain than that, the Power of the Highest in these Texts is the explication of the Holy Ghost? |
| A23823 | What then? |
| A23823 | What then? |
| A23823 | What then? |
| A23823 | What? |
| A23823 | What? |
| A23823 | What? |
| A23823 | When the Father is called, the one God, and the only true God; in opposition to all false Gods: is he not so called in opposition to the Son also? |
| A23823 | Where has he found, that those early Sacrifices were Typical of the Sacrifice of Christ? |
| A23823 | Where now is that unchangeable Tradition, so much cried up? |
| A23823 | Whereupon our Author says, The single Question is, Whether Christ be that God of whom the Psalmist says, that He ascended on High? |
| A23823 | Who denies that those Words, He knew what was in Man, signify inherent Personal Knowledg? |
| A23823 | Who taught''em so? |
| A23823 | Whom, what Person or God, does this Trinity beseech? |
| A23823 | Why does he not speak the Language of Scripture? |
| A23823 | Why innocent Beasts must die, to expiate the Sins of Men? |
| A23823 | Why not rather, in his own Mediatory Kingdom, does his own Will, seeks his own Glory? |
| A23823 | Why not? |
| A23823 | Why should God he propitiated by a Man, subject to the same Sins and Infirmities, and very often guilty of them, that other Men are? |
| A23823 | Why should Men call us Hereticks and Libertines, because we inquire after Truth; and will have our Faith built upon a solid Foundation? |
| A23823 | Why then does this Author affirm; that to intercede with the Authority of a Mediator, is above the Nature and Order of Creatures? |
| A23823 | Will it not follow, that all the Power He is invested with, is as a Man, not as God? |
| A23823 | and all good Christians are they not also Sons of God, in the Language of Scripture? |
| A23823 | and is he not distinguished from the Son, who is called the Messenger? |
| A23823 | and that He is the First- born of every Creature, and has created all Things, as He is God? |
| A23823 | but then they must not part with three Persons of the Trinity: Therefore, what are those three Persons? |
| A23823 | does he say, we have Redemption thrô his Blood, as He is a Man? |
| A23823 | has our Author forgot, or is he to learn, that Moses, thô a meer Creature, was a Mediator between God and his People? |
| A23823 | how long shall it be, that Men will love Darkness rather than Light; and prefer a Novel and Unintelligible Gospel, before the old, plain and easy One? |
| A23823 | how the Spirit of God differs from his Gifts and Graces? |
| A23823 | if Christ be as Great, and have as great Power and Authority as God has, how can God be called his God? |
| A23823 | if he is, what need is there for him to intercede? |
| A23823 | the asserting of Christ''s Divinity? |
| A23823 | when the Apostle says, that Christ took upon him the Form of a Servant; must we say, that he did not? |
| A23823 | why has he concealed a matter of so great importance to be known? |
| A23823 | why must Father here signify, not the Father; but one Godhead, of which the Father is the Source? |
| A23823 | why then should he not signify here Personally, God the Father, as well as in other places? |
| A23823 | — The Temple then was a Figure, and we must inquire, what it was the Figure of? |