This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
A61877 | All Phlebotomy draweth from the Circumference to the Center: when he reasons thus? |
A61877 | All poysons do not ingender a Feaver in him that takes them: why should we think otherwise of Plagues? |
A61877 | An etiam purpurati veneni essentiae diversitas variare purpurae symptomata poterit? |
A61877 | An illa impediunt motum naturae? |
A61877 | And Ballonius observes:"An commode praescribi possunt medicamenta antiquam morbilli se produnt? |
A61877 | And doth not such a condensation, dryness and heat indicate a befitting relaxation and humectation? |
A61877 | And may I not ask, if the Spirits be n ● t the immediate Instruments of the Soul? |
A61877 | And since it is natural( and Nature is constant) why is not the Disease more ancient and universal than it appears to be? |
A61877 | And that Chymistry was not in use with Aristotle and his Sectators? |
A61877 | And why we may not do it in this Disease? |
A61877 | Are we not obliged to facilitate and secure the Crisis by convenient means before it approach? |
A61877 | Besides, How is it a Crisis, when there seldom proceeds any Coction, and when the preceeding Disease observes no times? |
A61877 | Besides, who in Physick ever found out such a Rule, as Vrgency, or a Cura coacta did not absolve the Practitioner from its obligation at sometimes? |
A61877 | Besides, who would not allow us to create him a little trouble or weakness,( easie to be repaired) thereby to recover him from a greater evil? |
A61877 | Besides, whoever defined a Feaver so as to make its Gen ● ● ● to be An Accident? |
A61877 | But what is all this to a Feaver- Fire, and Reading by it? |
A61877 | But, What is it that Ecebolius doth purpose to himself? |
A61877 | By the difference of the Character, who would not imagine that he reflected on me as Red- Headed? |
A61877 | Do I speak of the Methods of Physick, Chirurgery, or any Practical Art? |
A61877 | Do not we see this frequently to happen, where no irritation hath been through Sudorifics, or other Medicaments? |
A61877 | Doth any man imagine it possible that Civil Society can subsist, if such Practices as these be tolerated? |
A61877 | Doth not Collado argue judiciously against the generality of that Assertion? |
A61877 | Doth not Hippocrates caution us against the returning in of an Erysipelas? |
A61877 | Doth not then Nature add to the redundance of blood by a defective transpiration; whereas the veins are so full as not to be able to contain more? |
A61877 | First I observe that the Galenists are at a difference whether the Mass of blood contain those Humours actually, or only potentially? |
A61877 | For why may not we in England bear that which they do in Holland? |
A61877 | H. V.) and pleaded earnestly for an Indulgence towards them in the Liturgical way, deserved best at their Hands? |
A61877 | Have my Adversaries? |
A61877 | He hath now varied the Letter, and saith Red hot; is not this the Sophistication of a gross Lye? |
A61877 | Hence even a man that is a speculative Artist( how much more those that are neither speculative, nor Empirics?) |
A61877 | How much blood doth he account to be a great Quantity? |
A61877 | I come now to the practise of Phlebotomy, about which sundry Questions arise: As, Whether it may be` administred in the beginng of the Disease? |
A61877 | I come now to the third Question: Whether in the State of the Small Pox Phlebotomy may by administred? |
A61877 | I know not how diligent our Observatour was, when he took notice of such as miscarried upon Phlebotomy: were the Physicians besitting Artists? |
A61877 | I would willingly know how this Arch ● us doth frame the Idaea of a disease? |
A61877 | If it be Hypocrisie to defend the Monarchy, Religion, and Universities of this Nation: What Bottom do you stand on? |
A61877 | If such an habit of body be thus perillous during perfect health, how ought a Physician to apprehend it upon the first approaches of sickness? |
A61877 | If the Small Pox be a Crisis of the Feaver, what influence hath that consid ● ration upon us, before the time of the Crisis? |
A61877 | If the thing did succeed, I inquire, Whether it will constantly, or most commonly follow upon the like causes and circumstances? |
A61877 | In the State? |
A61877 | Is it a true Maxime in Natural Philosophy, which in Law sometimes passeth currently? |
A61877 | Is it not prudential, were a little blood so precious a thing, and the loss thereof attended with some small irrepairable debility? |
A61877 | Is it upon this sentiment that Physicians reiterate their Phlebotomies? |
A61877 | Is this the effect of that Revulsion, that the Humors should slow more inward? |
A61877 | Material or Im ● ● terial? |
A61877 | Must we then abandon Nature to her self, and stand Idle Spectators amidst so great and visible dangers? |
A61877 | Nay, doth not he tell us, that in his way? |
A61877 | O ● on ▪ Can not an Accident be the product of a fore going cause? |
A61877 | Or whether it is a rare accident? |
A61877 | Or, How do you expect to be served? |
A61877 | Or, doth not he rather deserve to be wonder''d at, that should expect in so different circumstances for resembling effects? |
A61877 | Other remedy there is none: and what imports it, if the attempt be hazardous, since the omission is likely to be more fatal? |
A61877 | Praeterea quid sensui respondebimus? |
A61877 | Quod ob facinus tam egregium quae non tibi laudes, vir praestantissime, quae non soteria debentur? |
A61877 | Quorsum sine ulla indicatione audet Medicus turbare crisin? |
A61877 | Rouse is dead) the Trooping Divines, the Decipherer of his Majestie''s Letters, the Followers of Oliver, and King Dick, not to mention others? |
A61877 | Sed quod dicemus objectioni illi? |
A61877 | That which may in some persons, and in some circumstances incline unto a Feaver, is never the proper remedy of a Feaver? |
A61877 | The last Question is, Whether in the declination of the Disease a Physician may practise Phlebotomy? |
A61877 | The second Question is; Whether in the AUGMENT or increase of the Small Pox, it be lawful to let the Patient bleed? |
A61877 | Though it hath been disputed, and is still, How Uision is performed, and where? |
A61877 | Was He Reverend, Learned, and Ingenious? |
A61877 | Was He the only Man that spoke Sense in the Age of Non- sense? |
A61877 | Was it, Generous Sirs, any Faction in me, or the Testimony of a Factious Spirit to oppose the Presbyterians? |
A61877 | What Prayers, what Graces he uttered in those Families? |
A61877 | What becomes of the duumvirate then? |
A61877 | What consequence is there in his Argument, that because they do not deceive us on Earth, therefore they will not in the Skie? |
A61877 | Whether in the Pest it be lawful and beneficial to let blood? |
A61877 | Whether the Pest be a Feaver 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉? |
A61877 | Who can Dispute with such men as these? |
A61877 | Who ever denied that Diseases were cured by these Physicians, using Reason, Experience, and General Rules? |
A61877 | Who is now the impertinent? |
A61877 | Who knows not, how Herbary had been improved by Theophrastus, Dioscorides, the Arabians, and other Peripateticks, in like manner? |
A61877 | Why also are splenetic persons( in whom we may best suppose such a Diathesis) not inclined to Pleurisies; except the spurious and flatulent ones? |
A61877 | Will the generous Cavaliers endure this from a Rump- Chaplain? |
A61877 | Would He overthrow all our Laws as well as the Act of Oblivion? |
A61877 | Yet is there no man that can rationally condemn bleeding in that Disease? |
A61877 | and After the Pox come forth? |
A61877 | and Declination? |
A61877 | and from the surface to the center? |
A61877 | and what this Idaea of a Feaver is? |
A61877 | and withall( because my knowledge is not the adequate Measure of possibilities in nature) Whether it were done? |
A61877 | did the Patient, and all Attendants faithfully discharge their duty? |
A61877 | hath Mr. R. B. declared thus much in Print yet? |
A61877 | in those Dayes: And I cast my self upon the Royallists for my Judges; What say ● ee Gentlemen? |
A61877 | or can there be such an heat, without an obstipation thereof? |
A61877 | or practise them at all in the Itch, Leprosie, or Erysipelas? |
A61877 | or that more than one at White- chappel, should suffer by his ill- advised Pepper- drops? |
A61877 | or, was it a Crime then to serve my Patron? |
A61877 | that which is properly Blood, Melancholy, Choler and Phlegm are the constitutive parts of the Blood, in its natural consistence and Crasis? |
A61877 | to return — G. T. his own words: Is it a Substance, or an accident? |