This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
A13708 | ],[ London? |
A78254 | 1 sheet([ 1] p.) s.n.,[ London? |
A88998 | Whether are the old Draynes or the new, most usefull for dreyning? |
A88998 | Whether drayning Land hurtfully surrounded, is good for the Common- wealth? |
A88998 | Whether is not dreyning good for the Common wealth? |
A88998 | Whether is this Levell of the Earle of Lindsey hurtfully surrounded? |
A88998 | Why did not the Countrey pay the Tax of a Mark the Acre? |
A88998 | Would it not be a brave improvement to have Rape and Cole- seed, Hemp, Flax, and likewise Corne? |
A61244 | ( i. e.) Why are the higher the swifter, and the lower the ● lower? |
A61244 | And Motion, and Rest, what accidents are they in Nature? |
A61244 | And both men and beasts, which are not fastened to the Earth, how could they resist so great an impetus? |
A61244 | And by this rule the innumerable other fixed stars had no existence before that men did look on them? |
A61244 | And can not you, Simplicius, give a reason for this, without others prompting you? |
A61244 | And did you not say, that the project being drawn by its own weight, declineth from the Tangent towards the centre of the Earth? |
A61244 | And do not you pe ● ceive a shamefull errour therein? |
A61244 | And do you say that this is not a manifest Paralogism? |
A61244 | And doth he by this demonstration prove the time of the fall to be above six dayes? |
A61244 | And have you no other conceit thereof than this? |
A61244 | And he likewise makes his opposition to this also; demanding who carrieth the air about, Nature, or Violence? |
A61244 | And how long would that Ball move, and with what velocity? |
A61244 | And if his power be infinite, why should he not rather exercise a greater part thereof than a lesse? |
A61244 | And if in that operation it shall happen, that any mutation shall discover it self, what and how great benefit will it bring to Astronomy? |
A61244 | And if these are fallacies, what true demonstrations were ever so fair? |
A61244 | And if you call this a probable Discourse, what shall the necessary demonstrations be? |
A61244 | And if you do not dayly see herbs, plants, animals to generate and corrupt, what is it that you do see? |
A61244 | And in case it were thrust forward by the impression of some violent impetus from without, what and how great would its motion be? |
A61244 | And is this the sum of his method? |
A61244 | And lastly, he declareth the goodnesse of God in general, who daily createth and preserveth all things? |
A61244 | And of these simple elementary bodies, what are the natural motions? |
A61244 | And the annual alteration of those ebbings and flowings do, it seems, depend on the additions and substractions of the diurnal conversion? |
A61244 | And the annual motion of the Sun through the Ecliptick, is it not on the contrary from West to East? |
A61244 | And the contact likewise of another sphere equal to the first, shall be also a like particle of its superficies? |
A61244 | And these two conclusions, are they not of such a nature, that one of them must necessarily be true, and the other false? |
A61244 | And this being overthrown, which was as it were their foundation, have these Novellists any thing more wherewith to maintain their assertion? |
A61244 | And this greater difficulty, wherein think you doth it depend? |
A61244 | And this incorruptibility, from whence do you prove it? |
A61244 | And towards what part? |
A61244 | And what a folly it is to say the Coelestial part is unalterable, because no stars do generate or corrupt therein? |
A61244 | And what difference think you, was there betwixt the Dove of Architas, and one made by Nature? |
A61244 | And what greater folly can there be imagined, than to call Jems, Silver and Gold pretious; and Earth and dirt vile? |
A61244 | And what is that? |
A61244 | And what is the Wind? |
A61244 | And what say you, Sagredus? |
A61244 | And what ward will you choose in this combate for this first blow? |
A61244 | And when it should be to return, and re- unite it self to the Earth, by what line would it then move? |
A61244 | And when the stone leaveth the sling, what is its motion? |
A61244 | And where leave you that reason, namely, that as it were by the law of Nature, this number is used in the sacrifices of the Gods? |
A61244 | And who knows but that to the Earth, which beholdeth them without eyes, they may not shew very great, and such as in reality they are? |
A61244 | And who knows not that the whole History of the rich Glutton doth consist of the like phrases of Vulgar Speech? |
A61244 | And who saith that I can not draw other lines? |
A61244 | And why being so dictated by nature, do we atribute to those things that are three, and not to lesse, the title of all? |
A61244 | And why have you not, without being put to believe other mens relations, examined and observed those alterations with your own eyes? |
A61244 | And why might not that by the tangent be so swift, as not to give the pen time to return to the surface of the Earth? |
A61244 | And why not whither the contrary parts tend, namely, those which touch the ground? |
A61244 | And why not? |
A61244 | And why not? |
A61244 | And why should they be vain and uselesse? |
A61244 | And why so remote? |
A61244 | And with what demonstration, I pray you? |
A61244 | Are they really pull''d down from Heaven to these lower regions, by vertue of that Authours calculations, whom Simplicius mentioneth? |
A61244 | Are we then to have still more of these strong oppositions against this annual motion? |
A61244 | Are you assured, then, that it would freely move towards the declivity? |
A61244 | Are you serious, or do you jest? |
A61244 | Aristotle, then, hath made you see that which without him you would not have seen? |
A61244 | As to the resolving of it, and finding out its fallacie, do you not in the first place see a manifest contradiction in it? |
A61244 | BG is 42657. in case the said DB were 8142. how much would BC be? |
A61244 | But I proceed to another consideration: What is the reason, doth he say, why the stars appear so little? |
A61244 | But Mars, Where shall we place it? |
A61244 | But by what right line? |
A61244 | But do not you see, that those very words carry in them a confutation of this solution? |
A61244 | But do not you think, that the Terrestrial Globe might supernaturally, that is, by the absolute power of God, be made moveable? |
A61244 | But do you know Simplicius, how this commeth to passe? |
A61244 | But do you think that the velocity doth fully make good the gravity? |
A61244 | But for Gods sake, if it move transversly, how is it that I behold it to move directly and perpendicularly? |
A61244 | But from one discourse to another whither are we stray''d? |
A61244 | But from whence do you argue that not the Earth, but the Sun is in the centre of the Planetary revolutions? |
A61244 | But how came this to be concealed from Copernicus, and revealed to you? |
A61244 | But how can a magnitude be diminished more than another, which hath a twofold diminution in infinitum? |
A61244 | But how could you in so short a time examine all this Book, which is so great a Volume, and must needs contain very many demonstrations? |
A61244 | But how much is the bow to be drawn, and how much slackened? |
A61244 | But how much lesse the fame of his sublime wit amongst the intelligent? |
A61244 | But how upon the winds being laid, doth the ship cease to move? |
A61244 | But if I grant you this, do not you perceive that it maketh so much the more against your cause? |
A61244 | But if I should say, that so it falleth out upon triall, how would you censure me? |
A61244 | But if one should require that that Ball should move upwards on that same superficies, do you believe that it would so do? |
A61244 | But if the illumination should be nothing, or so small, that you would scarse discern it, what would you say then? |
A61244 | But if the piece were placed, not prependicularly, but inclining towards some place, what would the motion of the ball be? |
A61244 | But if thou apprehendest it not, why wilt thou passe thy verdict upon things beyond thy comprehension? |
A61244 | But if you were to throw with your arm a stone, and a lock of cotton wool, which would move swiftest and farthest? |
A61244 | But in case we should recede from Aristotle, who have we to be our Guid in Philosophy? |
A61244 | But is there any such superficies in the World? |
A61244 | But on the inclining plane CA it would descend, but with a gentler motion than by the perpendicular CB? |
A61244 | But tell me, when the chariot moveth, doth not all things in the same move with the same velocity? |
A61244 | But tell me; that figure what ever it is which the stone hath, hath it the same in perfection, or no? |
A61244 | But the middle term, ought not that to be known? |
A61244 | But these things, were they not known to this Author? |
A61244 | But this motion beyond the centre, would it not be upwards, and according to your assertion preternatural, and violent? |
A61244 | But this point of motion, is it not a natural question? |
A61244 | But to overpass this also, how know you but that Coelestial rarity and density depend on heat and cold? |
A61244 | But what benefit can we draw from matters so hid and remote from us, as that we shall never be able to make use of them? |
A61244 | But what defence hath he for himself against so manifest contradictions? |
A61244 | But what do you understand by Earth? |
A61244 | But what effect hath the greater or less intensness of the bow upon the shaft? |
A61244 | But what followeth? |
A61244 | But what great exorbitancies are there in the Ptolomaick Systeme, for which there are not greater to be found in this of Copernicus? |
A61244 | But what hath this motion to do with that of the Earth, that in comparision to theirs is immense? |
A61244 | But what need I speak of this? |
A61244 | But what needs more discourse? |
A61244 | But what other difference have you behind, to exchange for this which you have named? |
A61244 | But what saith the Author to these? |
A61244 | But what talk I of Virgil, or any other Poet? |
A61244 | But what then? |
A61244 | But when of many and many computations that have been made, there should not be so much as two onely that prove true, what would you think of them? |
A61244 | But whether are we wandred with so long a digression, contrary to our former resolutions? |
A61244 | But which of these two pendent Globes do you think, would continue longest in motion, before that it would come to rest in its perpendicularity? |
A61244 | But who considereth that the self- same Scene of Life is ever acting, by different persons; and that nothing is new in humane affairs? |
A61244 | But who shall assure us, that the parts more inward and near to the centre are unfruitful? |
A61244 | But with what kind of motion? |
A61244 | But yet you understand that this onely right line shall again of necessity be the shortest of them all? |
A61244 | Can an Opinion be Heretical, and yet nothing concerning the salvation of souls? |
A61244 | Can you tell, Simplicius, which those circular motions be, that are not contrary to each other? |
A61244 | Did I not say it could be no other than a Sophism? |
A61244 | Did he ever lend you his eyes? |
A61244 | Do not you see, that if there is any advantage, the wall hath it? |
A61244 | Do you ask me how so? |
A61244 | Do you not answer me? |
A61244 | Do you not see that, in this case, the arrow would of necessity move with greater velocity than the air? |
A61244 | Do you now conceive what I would say? |
A61244 | Do you see, Simplicius, if greater inconveniences would happen? |
A61244 | Doth Aristotle demonstrate this, or doth he not rather barely affirm it, as serving to some certain design of his? |
A61244 | Doth he not lay down the conclusion as unknown? |
A61244 | Doth he think that Heaven is no Coelestial substance? |
A61244 | Doth it continue to follow its former circle, or doth it go by another line? |
A61244 | Doth not he know, that this commeth from the Instrument that we imploy in beholding them, to wit, from our eye? |
A61244 | Doth not he say that the circular motion of the Earth would be violent? |
A61244 | Doth thy imagination comprehend that vast magnitude of the Universe, wh ● ch thou afterwards judgest to be too immense? |
A61244 | For if it be natural, how then is that motion which is about the centre natural, seeing it differs in species from a right motion? |
A61244 | For who knows not that the Earth is alwaies the same? |
A61244 | For who will prescribe bounds to the Wits of men? |
A61244 | For whose profit and advantage? |
A61244 | Go to; if the Earth was generable and corruptible before that Inundation, why may not the Moon be so likewise without such a change? |
A61244 | Go to; tell me, Simplicius, are not these affections contrary to one another? |
A61244 | Grant that it were so where such proofs can not be had, yet if this case admit of them, why do not you use them? |
A61244 | Hath it not reason then to move in it self more swiftly upon the ground, than it did whilst it was in the air? |
A61244 | Have you ever tryed the experiment of the Ship? |
A61244 | He doth so; and very ingenious they are: particularly, That, Whence it cometh to pass that round tops run better than the square? |
A61244 | Hold a little, good Simplicius, this modern Author, what saith he to the new Stars, Anno 1572, and 1604, and to the Solar spots? |
A61244 | How can that be? |
A61244 | How can that be? |
A61244 | How can this be? |
A61244 | How can we then, with shots so uncertain, assure our selves of that which is in dispute? |
A61244 | How is this? |
A61244 | How long therefore would you have the moveable to move? |
A61244 | How much circumspection is there to be used in affirming or denying a proposition? |
A61244 | How much readier is Simplicius to apprehend the objections which favour the opinions of Aristotle, than their solutions? |
A61244 | How so? |
A61244 | How then can you make these motions being conferred on the Earth, of contraries to become consistents? |
A61244 | How then doth this come to pass? |
A61244 | How, do you not know that? |
A61244 | How, is there no such thing acknowledged? |
A61244 | How? |
A61244 | How? |
A61244 | How? |
A61244 | I do not very well understand this business; do you, Salviatus? |
A61244 | If that superficies were inclining? |
A61244 | If the first; what manner of accident is it? |
A61244 | If thou comprehendest it; wilt thou hold that thy apprehension extendeth it self farther than the Divine Power? |
A61244 | Insuper quî fit, ut istae res tam variae tantùm moveantur ab Occasu in Ortum, parallelae ad Aequatorem? |
A61244 | Is it haply, because they seem so to us? |
A61244 | Is it not all one whether opinions and inventions be new to men, or the men new to them? |
A61244 | Is it not difference sufficient, that the simple and absolute are more swift than that which proceeds from predominion? |
A61244 | Is it not known to us, that all these elementary matters move round, together with the Earth? |
A61244 | Is it not only many thousand times greater than the descending motion of the pen, but than that of the stone? |
A61244 | Is it not so? |
A61244 | Is not this your argumentation? |
A61244 | Is there any way to shoot so that these flights may be equal? |
A61244 | Is, not then the Moons Orb one of the Celestial Spheres, and according to consent comprised in the middle of all the rest? |
A61244 | It may be he did not think of them? |
A61244 | It seems then, that the Monethly alteration of ebbings and flowings dependeth on the alteration of the annual motion of the Earth? |
A61244 | Likewise in Haggai: o Is the seed yet in the Bud? |
A61244 | May it not chance, that in its fall to the ground it may acquire a motion? |
A61244 | May we not say, and that with reason, that the structure of a Statue fals far short of the formation of a living man, yea more of a contemptible worm? |
A61244 | Moreover in the fourth Text; doth he not after some other Doctrines, prove it by another demonstration? |
A61244 | Must it be so, because we do not see them? |
A61244 | Nam si naturalis, quomodo& is motus qui circum est, naturalis est, cùm specie differat à recto? |
A61244 | Not so, Sir; I would not deprive you of it: but are the Queries yet at an end? |
A61244 | Now can there a better or more commodious Hypothesis be devised, than this of Copernicus,? |
A61244 | Now how much more neerer is the Moon to the Earth, than to any other of the Coelestial Orbs? |
A61244 | Now if Aristotle had seen these things, what think you he would have said, and done Simplicius? |
A61244 | Now of what use could the generations which we suppose to be made in the Moon or other Planets, ever be to mankind? |
A61244 | Now tell me, what would befall the same moveable upon a superficies that had neither acclivity nor declivity? |
A61244 | Now tell me; have you ever at midnight seen the Terrestrial Globe illuminated by the Sun? |
A61244 | Now what say you to this experiment? |
A61244 | Now what say you, Salviatus touching those stars? |
A61244 | Now what would Simplicius say to this? |
A61244 | Now, Simplicius, what shall we do with the fixed stars? |
A61244 | Now, what doth it import, that that impetus be conferred on the ball rather from the arm than from the horse? |
A61244 | Of a right line which toucheth a circle, which of its points is the nearest to the centre of that circle? |
A61244 | Or can it be said that the Holy Ghost purposed not to teach us a thing that concerned our salvation? |
A61244 | Or do you think that any Peripatetick is equally verst in the Copernican demonstrations? |
A61244 | Or why should that be necessary in the Moon, which importeth nothing on Earth? |
A61244 | Our conclusion which is to be proved, and which is unknown, is it not the stability of the Earth? |
A61244 | Perhaps he is the same with the Author of the Book, called Anti- Tycho? |
A61244 | Perhaps they are new to you? |
A61244 | Quae etiam si esset, quomodò tamen inveniretur in rebus tam contrariis? |
A61244 | Quam ergò veritatem sperare possumus à facultate adeò fallaci ortum trahentem? |
A61244 | Quare centrum sphaere delapsae sub Aequatore spiram describit in ejus plano: sub aliis parallelis spiram describit in cono? |
A61244 | Quare, quae Aequinoctiali propriores, in majori; quae remotiores, in minori circulo feruntur? |
A61244 | Quarè, quò sunt altiores, celeriùs; quò humiliores, tardiùs? |
A61244 | Quid est verò decipi sensum, nisi haec esset deceptio? |
A61244 | Sed contra —[ In English thus] If from an externe principle; Whether God doth not excite it by a continued Miracle? |
A61244 | Shall we dismantle that fort in which we are safe from all hostile assaults? |
A61244 | Shall we then overthrow that Fabrick under which so many passengers find shelter? |
A61244 | Si latio circularis gravibus& levibus est naturalis, qualis est ea quae fit secundùm lineam rectam? |
A61244 | Si primum; quale nam illud? |
A61244 | Si terra staret per voluntatem Dei, rotaréntne caetera, an non? |
A61244 | So I think, provided one did lay it down gently: but if it had an impetus given it towards any part, what would follow? |
A61244 | So that the recession of the project from the circumference of the precedent circular motion is very small in the begining? |
A61244 | So that, if those lines should not be equal, that same solidity would be no longer a sphere? |
A61244 | Tell me a little, do not these motions go continually accelerating? |
A61244 | Tell me in the next place? |
A61244 | Tell me now what you believe the same ball would do put upon the Horizontal plane AB? |
A61244 | Tell me now which appears clearest unto you, that of the Wall or that of the Glasse? |
A61244 | Tell me now, doth not this wet brick shew more dull than the other dry ones? |
A61244 | Tell me now; do you believe that the Moon is really more shining in the night than day, or that by some accident it seemeth so? |
A61244 | Tell me therefore, how much do you think sufficeth to make that motion swifter than this? |
A61244 | Tell me therefore; know you that a thing which moveth, being impeded stands still? |
A61244 | Tell me, therefore, do you think that a Ship which should sail from the Strait of Gibralter towards Palestina can eternally move towards that Coast? |
A61244 | Tell me; of two penduli hanging at unequal distances, doth not that which is fastned to the longer threed make its vibrations more seldome? |
A61244 | Texts, after the definition of Continual? |
A61244 | That those Truths which we know, are very few, in comparison of those which we know not? |
A61244 | The Diurnal motion of the primum mobile, is it not from East to West? |
A61244 | The Earth, the Sun, and Stars, what things are they in nature? |
A61244 | The middle term, which ought to be known, is it not the streight and perpendicular descent of the stone? |
A61244 | The moveable is here the same, that is, the same pen; now how can the same moveable superate and exceed it self in motion? |
A61244 | Then it seems the arrows shot, are to penetrate the air? |
A61244 | Then the four Medicean Planets, and the companions of Saturn came first into Heaven, when we began to see them, and not before? |
A61244 | Then the remotenesse of the Moon is not so great, that a like angle should be* insensible in her? |
A61244 | Then you do not think that the sight would fall upon that point of the Starry Sphere, that answereth to the direction of the Top- Gallant Top? |
A61244 | Therefore tell me, Simplicius, do you think there can be any shadow, where the rays of the Sun do shine? |
A61244 | Therefore tell me, what and where is this your intended centre? |
A61244 | These Propositions to my ears sound very harsh: and I believe to yours Simplicius? |
A61244 | They also may, perhaps, have their productions of things unknown to us? |
A61244 | This is truly admirable: and do you say that there is a Mathematical demonstration for it? |
A61244 | To the end they might seem so very small, and might have no influence at all upon the Earth? |
A61244 | To what end? |
A61244 | To what purpose is such a needlesse monstrous* immensity between them and Saturn? |
A61244 | Very well, Sir, have you ever a better experiment than this? |
A61244 | Very well: and for moveables equally swift, what''s your conceit of them? |
A61244 | Was it not enough that he could say of them the same which he spoke of the New stars? |
A61244 | Were they produced for the Earth, for an inconsiderable point? |
A61244 | What Philosopher hath writ all the parts of Natural Philosophy, and that so methodically without omitting so much as one single conclusion? |
A61244 | What Tygre, what Falcon runneth or flyeth with so much swiftness? |
A61244 | What excellent matter would the Heavens afford us for to make Pallaces of, if we could procure a substance so hard and so transparent? |
A61244 | What in the next place are the tokens that their motions are about the Sun? |
A61244 | What is this, but to make an Oracle of a Log, and to run to that for answers, to fear that, to reverence and adore that? |
A61244 | What of Navigation? |
A61244 | What other Author should we follow in the Schools, Academies and Studies? |
A61244 | What proportion doth one bear to a thousand? |
A61244 | What say you Simplicius? |
A61244 | What say you therefore, is the reflection of a Glasse lesse powerful than that of a Wall? |
A61244 | What shall I say of such and so various Instruments of that Art? |
A61244 | What shall we say of Architecture? |
A61244 | What shall we say therefore? |
A61244 | What then is its contact? |
A61244 | What then? |
A61244 | What truth therefore can we hope for, to be derived from so deceiveable a faculty? |
A61244 | What will it do then? |
A61244 | What wonder is it then, that the first reflection very lively illuminates, and that this other is almost imperceptible? |
A61244 | What would Ships do that lye out at Sea? |
A61244 | What, do they not agree? |
A61244 | Where doth he find that Copernicus maketh the annual motion by the Ecliptick contrary to the motion about its own centre? |
A61244 | Which then are those few that agree in placing the star in the same situation? |
A61244 | Which? |
A61244 | Whilst you were on horseback, did not your hand, and consequently the ball run as fast as the horse it self? |
A61244 | Who can deny it? |
A61244 | Who doubts it? |
A61244 | Who doubts it? |
A61244 | Who will assert that all that is sensible and knowable in the World is already discovered and known? |
A61244 | Who, I pray, in elder times could have found out this Mystery? |
A61244 | Why do you call the four jovial Planets, Moons? |
A61244 | Why do you not answer me? |
A61244 | Why these; Alterable, unalterable; passible,* impassible; generable, ingenerable; corruptible, incorruptible? |
A61244 | Will not they that in other points disagree with us, confess this( and it is a great truth) that Eaquae scimus, sint minima pars corum quae ignoramus? |
A61244 | Will you say that the Air is not a subject different from the arm? |
A61244 | Will you say the air giveth them a velocity greater than its own? |
A61244 | Will you say, that this new Water is borrowed from the Ocean, being brought in by the Straight of Gibraltar? |
A61244 | With what motion doth it move then? |
A61244 | Would it go haply, as in the other shot, by the perpendicular line, and return again by the same? |
A61244 | Would you then from false fundamentals deduce and establish a doubtful conclusion for true? |
A61244 | You believe then, that two stones, or two pieces of Iron taken at chance, and put together, do for the most part touch in one sole point? |
A61244 | You do not think then, that the tangent toucheth the superficies of the terrestrial Globe in one point only? |
A61244 | You have not made an hundred, no nor one proof thereof, and do you so confidently affirm it for true? |
A61244 | [ Which I thus render:] If the Earth be supposed to stand still by the will of God, should the rest of bodies turn round or no? |
A61244 | [ in English thus:] Which although it were, yet how could it be found in things so contrary? |
A61244 | [ scilicet:] Why are those near the Aequinoctial carried about in a greater circle, and those which are remote in a lesser? |
A61244 | an verò Angelus, an aër? |
A61244 | and confequently, do you not know in genere, that every bright body shews the clearer, by how much the ambient is obscurer? |
A61244 | and hath as yet the Vine and the Fig- tree, and the Pomegranate, and the Olive- tree brought forth? |
A61244 | and how much faster doth a piece of pure Earth descend, than a piece of Wood? |
A61244 | and how should the forces waste, where they are not at all imployed? |
A61244 | and if he saw them, what doth he say unto them? |
A61244 | and saith he not this without the least doubt or haesitation? |
A61244 | and that Wall, finally, what else is it but a little obscure Earth, unapt to shine? |
A61244 | and that for so much a greater space, by how much the superficies were more smooth, so that v. g. upon ice it would run a great way? |
A61244 | and that this is absurd, for that the order of the World is eternal? |
A61244 | and therefore not eternal? |
A61244 | and this greater velocity, what doth confer it on the arrow? |
A61244 | and what course shall the rayes of the Sun keep, which are to passe thorow the body of the Moon, that they may find out our eye? |
A61244 | and what is this? |
A61244 | and where? |
A61244 | and with how much facility? |
A61244 | are they petite things not worth our notice, or grand and worthy of consideration? |
A61244 | as for my part I can think of no other? |
A61244 | but by the various collocation of* twenty little letters upon a paper? |
A61244 | but if the air goeth along with them, yea, is that which carrieth them, what penetration can they make therein? |
A61244 | but what shall we say of the senses, and of the powers of the soul, and lastly, of the understanding? |
A61244 | do not you believe( as for my part I do) that it would lie still? |
A61244 | do you think that Salviatus is Master of, and knoweth how to unfold the Ptolomean and Aristotelian arguments? |
A61244 | five hundred paces? |
A61244 | hath any one seen a Terrestrial Globe corrupt, and another regenerate in its place? |
A61244 | have you any thing else to say, Simplicius, upon this particular? |
A61244 | have you it not first there proved, that there is no more but three dimensions, for that those three are all things, and that they are every where? |
A61244 | in igne, ut in aquâ; in aëre, ut in terra; in viventibus, ut in animà carentibus? |
A61244 | in living creatures, as in things wanting life? |
A61244 | in the air, as in the earth? |
A61244 | in the fire, as in the water? |
A61244 | is not this a more than evident argument of the motions being right, and towards the Centre? |
A61244 | keeping alwayes an equal course? |
A61244 | or an Angel, or the Air? |
A61244 | sub Polo descendit in axe lineam gyralem, decurrens in superficie cylindricâ consignatam? |
A61244 | that is, according as the said moveable in its deviation hath a greater or lesser space to move in the same time? |
A61244 | that they always move, and never rest? |
A61244 | to serve that which you call the drosse of the World, and sink of all uncleannesse? |
A61244 | ut semper moveantur, nunquam quiescant? |
A61244 | well aimed, you blame me for roving from the point in hand; but what have you to do with Schools and Markets? |
A61244 | what fine figures, what birds, what balls, and what other pretty things are here? |
A61244 | what will the Philosopher say then? |
A61244 | when will there be an end put to the new observations and discoveries of this admirable Instrument? |
A61244 | why may not I protract another line underneath, unto the point A, that may be perpendicular to the rest? |
A61244 | why of two is it said both, and not all, unless they be three? |
A61244 | wilt thou say, that thou canst imagine greater things than those which God can bring to passe? |
A61244 | you have placed us where the Glasses doth not reverberate upon us; but come along with me a little this way; how, will you not stir? |