This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
A93516 | s.n.,[ London? |
A34075 | This horrid Blasphemy is the import of all Perjury, the very Image of the False- Swearers Thoughts, and can any thing be more wicked? |
A70287 | And as concerning the Angels Swearing, to which of the Angels said he, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? |
A70287 | s.n.,[ London: 1666?] |
A56129 | A ● d can it then bee a miserie and Judgment to us? |
A56129 | And can it bee then any happiness ● and no judgement unto us to bee without ● King? |
A56129 | For their calamity shall rise suddenly, and who knoweth the ruine of them both? |
A42479 | 13. Who hath required these things at your hands? |
A42479 | Quis credet Paulum praec ● p ● i D ● minici suisse ● mm ● m ● rem? |
A44847 | Reply ▪ What needed one to be given by S. F. when thou gavest one thy self? |
A62568 | 61. that he being asked by the high Priest, Art thou the Christ the Son of the Blessed? |
A62568 | And what can more directly overthrow the great end and use of oaths, which are for confirmation, and to put an end to strife? |
A62568 | For what can be a greater affront to God, than to use his Name to deceive men? |
A62568 | When the Son of man comes, shall he find Faith on the earth? |
A91204 | And is not this plain way of God, the safest for you and the Army to follow, yea the only short cut to peace and settlement? |
A91204 | So had Alexander, but Alexander was poysoned, and what then became of his Army? |
A91204 | are they so deep in the hearts of the people, that they can assure themselves the newtrals, or those who have gone farre with them will quiesce? |
A91204 | or army yet got so much love? |
A27406 | And many Nations shall be joyned unto the Lord in that Day; In what Day? |
A27406 | And when the Keeper of the Prison said unto Paul and Sylas, Sirs, what shall I do to be saved? |
A27406 | Then shall they be built in the midst of my People; what People? |
A27406 | ],[ London? |
A33303 | It must be of things within our povver: or else to engage our selves by a vow to impossibilities, what is it but to prophane the sacred name of God? |
A33303 | Pay therefore that which thou hast vowed? |
A47520 | And if the Oaths were not Lawful, why did you take them now? |
A47520 | And why this uncharitable Censure that''t was because K. James being now fled, he must either take the Oaths or lose his Living? |
A47520 | If the Oaths were Law ● ● ● 〈 ◊ 〉 did you not take them before? |
A54117 | At least to maintain Charity by, If our sentiments of the Intention of the Text are not the same? |
A54117 | But since none can be so orthodox as that deliver''d to us in Gods Book, why should we press the point further? |
A54117 | Or how can we frame a better General to Center In? |
A54117 | Who can Determine with equal Authority to that of the Holy Ghost? |
A54117 | Who can express His mind Apter? |
A54117 | s.n.,[ London: 1698?] |
A34536 | Have the Majority of them as so many single Persons severally declared such a meaning, as is suggested in the Objection? |
A34536 | Or can it reasonably be imagined that they would ever so declare? |
A34536 | Or is there any other Evidence or convincing Reason to be produced for it? |
A34536 | Or that in the third Part, they intended the abjuring of all kind of endeavour, and not that only which the Law forbids, or is not warranted by Law? |
A34536 | Whether the words do signifie a just and good meaning according to a Rational Interpretation? |
A44835 | And why dost thou bring the Scripture that was spoken to the Jewes, and apply it to the Christians? |
A44835 | Did ever any of the Apostles so in the Primitive times? |
A44835 | Hast thou not taught people to swear, first one way, and then an ● ther? |
A44835 | John Tombs, IS it not a shame for thee, who art called a Baptist, thus to manifest thy sel ●, and divide thy self from thy own people? |
A44835 | or are we not to believe the Scripture as it speaks till again it be translated by him? |
A45317 | : 1700?] |
A45317 | WHether an Act of Parliament may not be void, and of none Effect in whole or in part? |
A45317 | Whither this be not such Matter of Religion, as ought to have been consider''d in a free National Synod, before it was past in an Act of Parliament? |
A45317 | s.n.,[ London? |
A27407 | And if the Lord hath so done, and so doth, ought not all those who are his Ministers upon Earth, to do the like? |
A27407 | And what if some now, as heretofore, believe not the Command of Christ, shall their unbelief make the Faith of God of none effect? |
A27407 | But, whether Christ hath forbidden all Swearing? |
A27407 | The thing in Dispute is not, Whether Christ did ever forbid any thing that was not of it self evil? |
A48827 | He attempted it when he was not half so deeply obliged, and can we think he will not pursue it now? |
A48827 | The Church- Men say King William is too kind to Dissenters; but hath he given them any other or more Liberty than King James did? |
A48827 | What a shadow of a Dream then must this be of Protestant Subjects, being happy under a bigotted Popish Prince of such a Temper? |
A48827 | Yet still what Grievances are these Taxes, in comparison of what is laid on the French Slaves, into whose Condition we were intended to be brought? |
A52601 | Is it not the preservation of Religion, where it is reformed and the Reformation of Religion, where it needs? |
A52601 | What do we vow? |
A52601 | What doe we covenant? |
A52601 | What is this but the contents and matter of our Oath? |
A69859 | Can there be evil in the City,( saith Amos,) and the Lord hath not done it? |
A69859 | He who was once our lawfull King, or he who by Force, or otherwise, hath dethroned this King, and is himself seated upon the Throne? |
A69859 | I ask then, What is the cause why we may lawfully own their Supremacy? |
A69859 | Is it the unlawfullness of their War? |
A69859 | Is not he rather to be called so, and to be look''d upon to be such, upon whom God hath transferr''d this Power? |
A69859 | The King de jure, or the King de facto? |
A69859 | The next Question is, Who is to be owned as supreme? |
A69859 | What can it be then? |
A43269 | But what if in the 4 th place the matter be purely indifferent? |
A43269 | But who sball be judge ef that? |
A43269 | For with that face can a man invoke that Mercy which he hath expressly renounced? |
A43269 | In order to give answer to the 2 d. query, how far such an oath doth extend? |
A43269 | Lord, who shall abide in thy Tabernacle? |
A43269 | What if a man swears, and doth not intend to swear? |
A43269 | What oath can then be too hard for men of this persuasion to swallow? |
A43269 | Whether an oath taken in words so comprehensive, doth oblige to the performance of every Statute? |
A43269 | Whether every one that hath thus sworn is guilty of a rash oath, as having sworn to more then he knows? |
A43269 | how just is it, that he who hath thus disclaimed Gods favour, should be forsaken when he stands most in need of it? |
A43269 | that he who hath thus abused the Holy Name of God, should not be heard when calleth upon that Name? |
A43269 | that is, who shall be accounted worthy to be a member of thy faithfull congregation here, and to be admitted into thy presence hereafter? |
A43269 | what can be more absurd then to, suppose that both these sins may be taken off, by adding a third sin of Hypocrisy? |
A43269 | who shall dwell in thy holy hill? |
A28913 | 36. what shall we think of idle oathes, which signifie nothing but a profane and vain spirit, will not they inflame the reckoning exceedingly? |
A28913 | But was this any advantage to them, that they were so accustomed to evill, that they could not leave it? |
A28913 | Can the Aethiopian change his skin, or the Leopard his spots? |
A28913 | Canst thou draw out Leviathan ● ith a Hook? |
A28913 | If the Lord help not, how sad is the condition of any of us ▪ and shall we forfeit our Interest in it by breaking the Oathes we enter into? |
A28913 | Is not every mans particular burthen heavie enough for him to bear? |
A28913 | They also who regard not truth, judgement, and righteousnesse in their oathes, what reproof is sharp enough for them? |
A28913 | Thou shalt not forswear thy self,& c. was it not well said? |
A28913 | To swear falsly by the Name of the God of truth, how great a provocation is it? |
A28913 | What is it that was said by them of old time? |
A28913 | Where you find him exceeding solicitor to preserve his reputation from the stain of lightnesse; When therefore was thus minded did I use lightnesse? |
A28913 | or the things that purpose do I purpose according to the flesh, that with me there should b ● yea, yea, and nay, nay? |
A28913 | what madnesse to curse ourselves by our blessings? |
A29793 | And my Lord Cat himself not more rever''d;( Tho Robes Episcopal much Reverence draw) T''instruct and keep Parochial Mice in awe? |
A29793 | And now Obedience in a second Sphere, To their ador''d new Monarch does appear? |
A29793 | But who the Devil, if this be your way, Will ever value what you Preach or Pray? |
A29793 | Can you then murmur? |
A29793 | Come, come, Sweet- hart, you must resolve upon''t; Must I give place, Is''t fit that I should want? |
A29793 | Consider if I should your Wishes Crown, What a strange Noise''t would make about the Town, How many galling Censures must I bear? |
A29793 | Could any Man of Sense give such a Reason? |
A29793 | Does not your Conscience find the Scripture saith, Preserve thy self? |
A29793 | How many savoury Bits were mine before? |
A29793 | How much ill In every Age is done by Woman still? |
A29793 | How much unable was Mankind decreed To contradict, when Love and Beauty plead? |
A29793 | If Profit be your Aim, why wo n''t you swear? |
A29793 | Should any think Instruction out of season? |
A29793 | Suppose I should, what would the Subject say, That I thus long have seem''d to disobey? |
A29793 | Though that one Reason is enough, by Jove You''re safe, because''t is more than they can prove: Why, is it strange you should past Errors see? |
A29793 | Visitant W. What crack- brain''d Whimsie have you lately done? |
A29793 | Was''t not your Wife? |
A29793 | What can you mean by Preaching pro& con? |
A29793 | What''s Censure, to six hundred Pounds a year? |
A29793 | have I been one of those, On whom you long did formerly Impose? |
A94740 | 6, 7. when the contrary was most true, and they will be found to be the faithful martyrs of Jesus? |
A94740 | Art thou well in thy wits who babblest these things? |
A94740 | As the Apostle Paul, though he said, what have I to do to judge them that are without? |
A94740 | Do not they seek to recover stollen goods, due debts? |
A94740 | It is not proved, that by the servants of the housholder, are meant the civil Magistrate, why not the Angels termed reapers? |
A94740 | Oh how can they be converted, if they be not permitted where the Gospel is preached? |
A94740 | Richard Hubberthorn thus saith, Is this a proof for men to swear and take oaths for men, or against men? |
A94740 | Saith Hubberthorn, Did not the Translator of the Bible understand Greek as well as John Tombes? |
A94740 | Saith he, Or are we not to believe the Scripture, as it spoaks, till again it be translated by him? |
A94740 | These Petitioners after make them the Apostles: will they have them to tolerate Idolaters in the Church? |
A94740 | We might make a Catalogue of Sauls, Davids, Solomons, and others oppressions in temporal things, shall we therefore deny their regal power in them? |
A94740 | Whence art thou to us a new interpreter of Laws? |
A94740 | hath not the man here lost the understanding of a man? |
A94740 | yea whence art thou an interpreter of our Laws, which thou didst not make? |
A54038 | And he that will venture to break this, what but Deceit and Treachery can be expected from him? |
A54038 | And what is it that binds? |
A54038 | For what is the substance and intent of an Oath? |
A54038 | How out of the World? |
A54038 | Is not Christ the Truth, the Substance? |
A54038 | Is not he that is in Him, the New- Creature? |
A54038 | Is not the Confessing of God by a Christian, of more weight, than the Swearing by Him from a Jew or Heathen? |
A54038 | Is not this the Bond of the Gospel? |
A54038 | Now, O King, shall not God''s People be faithful and obedient to the Lord as well as to thee? |
A54038 | Was it useful in the Innocent state? |
A54038 | Were not all the Oaths and Shadows of the Law, to last till Christ the Substance came? |
A54038 | and doth not this seal Truth, and keep to Truth more firmly, than the Oath under the Law could? |
A54038 | doth He call them from having any being or commerce in the Earth, or in the World? |
A54038 | is it the shadow, or the substance? |
A54038 | is it the words of an Oath, or the sense and weight of the thing upon the spirit? |
A54038 | is not the intent of it to bind to the speaking or performing of Truth? |
A54038 | or, Whether Christ alloweth his Disciples to swear in solemn Cases, as Moses did allow his Disciples? |
A54038 | or, did God appoint it there, when man could not but speak Truth? |
A54038 | or, is it useful in the Redeemed Estate, where a greater Bond is received, and professedly held forth, than the Innocency of Mans Nature was? |
A70864 | * And have they not been so more since and now, then ever before? |
A70864 | * Have they not since that in 1648. and now again effected it? |
A70864 | 3, 4, 5. may be credited? |
A70864 | And Joshua called for them, and spake unto them saying; Wherefore have ye beguiled us, saying, We are very far from you, when you dwell among us? |
A70864 | Et cum dominus dicat, Nolite tangere Christos meos,& David: quis inquit, extendet manum suam in Christum Domini,& innocens erit? |
A70864 | Quae ergò spes talibus populis, contra hostes laborantes, erit? |
A70864 | Quae fides ultra cum aliis gentibus in pace credenda? |
A70864 | Quaere, whether this be not violated in every branch in the highest degree? |
A70864 | Quisenim adeò furiosus est, qui caput suum manu sua propria desecet? |
A70864 | Quod si in bello sides valeat, quanto magis in suis servanda est? |
A70864 | Vis ergò longè esse a perjurio? |
A70864 | c. 7? |
A70864 | or submit to any Oaths, Taxes, Edicts of theirs as Parliamentarie or legal? |
A70864 | quae in hostibus jurata sponsio stabilis permanebit, quando ipsis propriis Regibus juratam fidem non servant? |
A70864 | quod foedus non violandum? |
A70864 | to whom will ye flee for help, and where will ye leave your glory? |
A36240 | And can we think that all this Endearment and Obligation was designed to hire them only to a Neutrality? |
A36240 | And then how can they mean veraciously that they will not disturb the peace, in the sense of the present Possessors? |
A36240 | And what can they mean less by it than, that the Laws do also not own such a Possessor for a Rightful K? |
A36240 | And what will the Imposers gain by this unhappy victory over Consciences? |
A36240 | But it will then deserve a further enquiry whether the Duty of their former Oaths be consistent with such a meaning? |
A36240 | How can any thing be truly due to him who has no Right to it? |
A36240 | How can we, for shame pretend Conscience against Popery when secular Punishments do so easily and so universally drive us from our Principles? |
A36240 | It will therefore concern them to consider whether their Old Notions be any way consistent with this New Declaration? |
A36240 | Or how can he have a Right to that Allegiance, which is only the Right of lawful Kings, who is himself only a pretensed K. in deed, and not in Right? |
A36240 | Or how can they conceal the secrets of the K. de facto, against the K. de Jure, without breaking their former Oaths to the K. de Jure? |
A36240 | That is, Whether their Oaths to the K. de jure, be consistent with a Neutrality? |
A36240 | What would they say of Wives that should also take Husbands de facto, and promise and swear to give them all the Rights of Husbands de Jure? |
A36240 | of a truly due Allegiance, and not only of such a one as will be judged due by the Possessor? |
A36240 | that is, Whether they do not oblige them to be Active in contributing towards his Restauration? |
A43978 | Beleeve you that I am able to do this? |
A43978 | Beleevest thou this? |
A43978 | For what is more ordinary then reproaches of those that are rich, towards them that are not? |
A43978 | How can He or They be said to be subiect to the Lawes which they may abrogate at their pleasure, or breake without feare of punishment? |
A43978 | How then shal the Scriptures be fullfilled, which say, that it must be so? |
A43978 | The Eunuch said, Here is Water, what doth let me to be baptized? |
A43978 | The Keeper of the Prison, fell down before Paul and Silas, and said, Sirs, what shall I do to be saved? |
A43978 | Then sayd they unto him, what shall we do, that we might work the works of God? |
A43978 | When one saith, I am of Paul, and another, I am of Apollos, are ye not carnal? |
A43978 | Why seest thou the Mote that is in thy Brothers eye, and seest not the Beam that is in thine own eye? |
A43978 | Why therefore may not men that foresee the Benefit of Concord, continually maintain the same without compulsion, as well as they? |
A43978 | hath be not spoken also by us? |
A43978 | in these words, VVhat hath the Lord spoken but only by Moses? |
A43978 | or S. Paul so perfect a Christian presently upon his Conversion? |
A43978 | or how could the good Thief be thought sufficiently catechized upon the Crosse? |
A43978 | or of those that sit in place of Judicature, towards those that are accused at the Bar? |
A43978 | saith, that His Yoke is easie, should require a matter of that difficulty? |
A75812 | How have we looked for the time of healing and behold trouble? |
A75812 | How religious will they believe all leagues? |
A75812 | Is there no Balm in Gilead? |
A75812 | Now after all these Ordinances, who could be so undutifull as to entertain the least fear of being ever hereafter forc''d to accuse himself? |
A75812 | Shall we so far yeild to passion, as utterly deny them the immmunities of their Ancesters? |
A75812 | Where is our Justice to neighbours, equally entitled by their birthright to the same freedom with our selves? |
A75812 | Where is our charity to Christians, professing the same Saviour, and believing the same Scriptures, with our selves? |
A75812 | Why are these Oathes continued with so sharpe a double edge, that unavoidably they either cut the purse or kill the Conscience? |
A75812 | and without it, who can say his Religion is best? |
A75812 | is there no Phisitian? |
A75812 | what shall we( that accuse the Papists of blind obedience) say to our selves, when our very leaders are so short- sighted? |
A75812 | why then is not the health of the Daughter of my people recovered? |
A47255 | 11. saith, Which of you shall have one sheep, and if it fall into a pit on the Sabbath day, will he not lay hold on it, and pluck it out? |
A47255 | 4. that the weapons of Christians are not carnal? |
A47255 | 9. Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord''s anointed, and be guiltless? |
A47255 | And can we suppose there is greater care taken for a particular Member, than for the whole Body? |
A47255 | And is the Extent and Latitude of the Duty of Allegiance limited by declaritory and express Laws? |
A47255 | And where were those Liberties then you so much boast of now? |
A47255 | And, whether we are bound to Treat with him, and call him back, or no? |
A47255 | But were it not Grand Impiety, by violence to seize upon the Estate or Goods of a private Man, and dispose of it to others? |
A47255 | Especially when( by his own Option and Choice) he should place his personal Interest and Safety in opposition to that of the Publick Weal? |
A47255 | Has not a Conqueror power to impose what Laws he pleases upon those Vassels and Slaves he has conquered? |
A47255 | Has the Supream Magistrate no Authority to command our Obedience? |
A47255 | How can that be? |
A47255 | How could King Henry give and grant those things were none of his? |
A47255 | Suppose the Oath were made to God,( which in propriety of Speech is a Vow) how does that weaken or invalidate the force of the Argument? |
A47255 | Suppose we grant somewhat of Agreement or Paction, between the Conqueror and the English Nobility; what Advantage is that to us? |
A47255 | This is a pleasant Story indeed: Are the Subjects Liberties more Ancient than the Conquest? |
A47255 | What Sacriledge then must it be to Invade the Dignities Royal, and dispose of the Crown and Scepter? |
A47255 | What are these strong and binding Obligations? |
A47255 | What can be more clear or obvious? |
A47255 | What''s this but Passive Obedience you so much condemn''d in the beginning of this Discourse? |
A47255 | Where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him, what dost thou? |
A47255 | have respect only to the Protection and Safety of the King''s Person, without having any Relation to the Peace and Welfare of the Publick? |
A47255 | what more positively evinced, than Monarchy, Iure Divino, from these Texts? |
A47255 | — Enquiry into the present State of Affairs, and in particular, Whether we owe Allegiance to the King in these Circumstances? |
A61528 | And is it likely that they who have done so should be Enemies to the Government? |
A61528 | And what is an Oath good for, that will answer to none of these ends and purposes? |
A61528 | And what security can you have against the breach of a Second Oath, from one who shews apparently he values not his First? |
A61528 | But what shall we get by such Discoveries? |
A61528 | For if he should come in by Conquest, how can any single Subject hinder him? |
A61528 | If all men therefore would fulfil their Oaths of Allegiance and Fidelity, what need would there be of imposing any New ones? |
A61528 | If those who take the Allegiance- Oath, should chance to take( as who can tell?) |
A61528 | Men Honester or more Loyal than they were before, nor yet prevent them from being False and Traiterous, or shew us when they are so? |
A61528 | That will neither discover Truth nor Falshood? |
A61528 | They are, it seems, to be discovered by Refusing the Oath; but they intend to take the Oath, and where is the discovery? |
A61528 | This is a long History, you will think, tho I have greatly shortened it; but whereto does it serve? |
A61528 | Well, but will all that take the Oath of Allegiance take the Oath of Abjuration? |
A61528 | What should hinder one from taking an Oath of Abjuration, who has no regard to his Oath of Allegiance? |
A61528 | What think you of the Application? |
A61528 | Will not therefore those who refuse it, be thereby discovered to be Enemies to the Present Government? |
A61528 | Will therefore an Oath of Abjuration discover who are the King and Queens Enemies? |
A61528 | Will therefore any such Persidious Men as these be discovered by an Oath of Abjuration? |
A31514 | And how shall I be assured that it is his right, and that his pursuance is lawfull, that I may joyne with him? |
A31514 | Fourthly, whether can this Oath betaken in faith? |
A31514 | Hath not our Liturgy( though established by Act of Parliament) beene rejected as Popish? |
A31514 | I sweare never to relinquish this Protestation,& c. Quaere, Doth this clause bind me for ever in no case to alter? |
A31514 | If his Majesty be excepted, why is it not expressed? |
A31514 | Notwithstanding it hath beene allowed by our Doctrine and established by our law? |
A31514 | Quaere, What are those priviledges of Parliaments and rights of Subjects? |
A31514 | Quaere, What is the Doctrine of the Church of England? |
A31514 | Quaere, in what extent is Popery here abjur''d? |
A31514 | That were to expose the Kingdome to perpetuall contention; the Parliament? |
A31514 | The King and Counsel? |
A31514 | The dictate of every private mans conscience? |
A31514 | What if the King and State should find it expedient hereafter to revoake this Protestation, or some thing in it? |
A31514 | Whether am I alone bound to maintaine him in his rights, or only joyntly with others? |
A31514 | Whether am I hereby to engage my selfe? |
A31514 | Whether onely in Doctrinals, and such onely as are fundamentall, or come nigh the foundation? |
A31514 | Whether that in the 39 Articles? |
A31514 | Whether to Discipline also? |
A31514 | Whither am I hereby bound to embroile my selfe in every private quarrell betwixt particular persons? |
A31514 | Why are we not directed to those lawes where we may be clearely informed, what are those undoubted priviledges and rights? |
A31514 | Why is it not specified, that we may know to what we sweare? |
A31514 | Why is not there a reservation of liberty to change with the State? |
A31514 | ],[ London? |
A31514 | and all innocent Ceremonies( though ancienter far then Popery) if abused by them? |
A31514 | or doe they vary in diverse Countries, according to the different constitutions of Statutes and charters depending on positive lawes? |
A31514 | or some deputed by his Majesty and the Parliament? |
A31514 | or the stronger part? |
A31514 | or to remoter superstructions undetermined? |
A31514 | what if a dispute arise when no Parliament sits? |
A27405 | 13. of force yea or nay? |
A27405 | And are not they inexcusable before God and Man, who have condemned others for so doing, and now do the same things? |
A27405 | And are these Ministers of the law who gives the law the ly, who say it shall be lawful when the law saith it shal not be lawful? |
A27405 | And if not, is not their crime as great as their predecessors, who suffered for such things? |
A27405 | And if this be not a dishonor to truth and the Gospel, what is? |
A27405 | And is that equal which is not iusts, ors equitys which is not lawfull? |
A27405 | And was ever such fruit brought fo ● th in any age? |
A27405 | And whether are the Justices the Masters of the law or the Ministers of the law? |
A27405 | And whether had not the late Kings and Parliaments power to make lawes, and to declare what was law yea or nay? |
A27405 | And whether is the Law of England a Rule in it self both for Magistrates and people to walke by, yea or nay? |
A27405 | And whether there is or ought to be any trebble dammage adjudged, where and when no tythes are due? |
A27405 | Are not such unreasonable men? |
A27405 | Are not these they that makes the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ chargeable? |
A27405 | From whence is that Law, and for what end was it given, that is not equall? |
A27405 | Have they not out stript all the burdens, all the grievous burdens of the Pharisees which they themselves will not touch with one of their fingers? |
A27405 | If nay, then why are the people punished as transgressors of that law which is repealed? |
A27405 | If nay, why was it inserted? |
A27405 | Now if these things doe not shame all Christian Magistrates and Rulers, what will, that have not a feeling in them with these sufferers? |
A27405 | WAs there ever such merchandize made of any people since the world began as these fals teachers have done in our age before mentioned? |
A27405 | Was ever the like heard in all ages since the world began? |
A27405 | Was it so yea or nay? |
A27405 | Whether is the Proviso in a statute, a part of the statute, yea or nay? |
A27405 | Whether the Law of England be the higher Power, or the Judges and Lawyers opinions, which may be gained for money? |
A27405 | Whether the Statutes of England be a part of the Law of England? |
A27405 | Whether there is any transgression where there is no law? |
A66244 | And after what Manner? |
A66244 | And for what Reason it was not fitting That Men should have been Allow''d to Go any Farther? |
A66244 | And for what Reason it was not sitting that Men should have been Allow''d to Go any farther? |
A66244 | And how many Ways he may be liable so to do? |
A66244 | And how many ways he may be Capable of so doing? |
A66244 | And then, 2dly, Wherein the peculiar Malignity of this Sin does Consist? |
A66244 | And what can he who has done this pretend to, or even hope for, at God''s hands? |
A66244 | BUT what then shall we say to this Passage of St. Matthew? |
A66244 | But in what Cases? |
A66244 | Can any thing be more Express? |
A66244 | FOR 1st: As to what concerns the Majesty of God; What can strike more directly at that, than this Sin of Perjury? |
A66244 | FROM what has been said, it may appear, What it is for a Man to Forswear himself? |
A66244 | For if we may innocently declare what we know Once, what harm can there be in doing it a second time? |
A66244 | How Men are brought so easily to Forswear themselves? |
A66244 | How ordinary a Practice is this among us? |
A66244 | I proceed,( 2dly) To offer some Reflections to shew, Wherein the Peculiar Malignity of this Sin does consist? |
A66244 | Nor can it be supposed, that the Paraphrast design''d by his latter Expression to explain his former( for if so, what need had he to make use of it?) |
A66244 | Or could our Saviour have spoken more plainly, had he design''d to have done, what some pretend he has done? |
A66244 | Or what is there to be Assign''d in it, Unworthy of that Religion, which He Came to Establish in the World? |
A66244 | What an Affront it puts upon the Majesty of God? |
A66244 | What can the best Laws do, if they are never put in Execution? |
A66244 | What if he be one who Believes not in any God at all; but Laughs at all our Talk either of a Providence here, or of a Judgment hereafter? |
A66244 | What things are required, in All Kinds of Oaths, to prevent our being Perjured, in taking of Them? |
A66244 | Whence it is that they are so ready to do it, on Every little Occasion? |
A66244 | Wherein is consider''d, What Perjury is; and How many Ways it may be Committed? |
A66244 | Wherein is consider''d, What Perjury is; and How many ways it may be Committed? |
A66244 | Who has already given Verdict against himself; and with his own Mouth pronounced, or rather chosen, his own Doom? |
A61779 | 15 Whether the party swearing not intending to swear be obliged? |
A61779 | 3 Whether an oath may be dispensed withall? |
A61779 | 5, 6 — or mentall Reservation? |
A61779 | But in this, now, Will you give me an hundred? |
A61779 | But that certainty which we seek in an oath, is los ● in equivocation; for what certainty can there be in his answer, whose meaning is uncertainty? |
A61779 | But what certainty can be had in words of an uncertain sense? |
A61779 | But what could be more clearly said in this matter, then that which Moses saies in the text? |
A61779 | But what of the obligation? |
A61779 | But why do I trouble my self with these things? |
A61779 | Doe you demand by what means? |
A61779 | For a past matter may be doubted whether it were so, or not so: as, did you see Caius yesterday in the market- place or no? |
A61779 | How shall I know that you will give me that hundred which you promised? |
A61779 | How( saith he) shall I pardon thee for this? |
A61779 | I ask theref ● re whether in such certain danger of ● ● e, was it lawfull for him to swear, or not lawfull? |
A61779 | I will tell you: Is any amongst you afflicted? |
A61779 | In one of which to the question, Who shall ascend into the Hill of the Lord? |
A61779 | In the other two a like question, Who shall abide in thy holy tabernacle? |
A61779 | Is any merry? |
A61779 | NEvertheless concerning this Hypothesis, I must advertise, that this question, Whether this or that oath be lawfull? |
A61779 | Nay, would he not be obliged notwithstanding that plea? |
A61779 | Of a thing sworn, the matter being stated, whether the conscience be, and how far it is obliged by the oath? |
A61779 | Of a thing to be sworn, the question is, whether it be lawfull to swear after this or that manner? |
A61779 | THe fourth case, whether man willing to swear, yet intending not to oblige himself, be neverthelesse obliged? |
A61779 | THe third Case is, whether a man doubtfull whether he have sworn, or no, be bound by by his oath? |
A61779 | The ends of this examen are two, the one before the oath, that a man may bethink himself, whether it be fit to use such a form, or no? |
A61779 | The first concerneth the person swearing, Whether, and how far the oath obligeth his Heirs, and Successors? |
A61779 | The first ease is, whether he who sweareth by the creature be, and how far he is obliged? |
A61779 | The inconveniencies which are objected from this silence, might they not( seeing dead men are enjoyned perpetuall silence) be objected from his death? |
A61779 | WHerefore the first doubt is, How far the oath of a person not indued with the faculty of judgement, obligeth? |
A61779 | Were it not ridiculous, if he who hath signed, and sealed a bond, shal plead that he had no intention thereby to oblige himself? |
A61779 | Where will you finde a knot to tye this Vertumnus unto one shape? |
A61779 | You told me you would give me an hundred; will you give me them? |
A61779 | differs very much from that, Whether this or that oath oblige? |
A61779 | or a future one, whether it will be so or not: as, will you lend me an hundred pound to morrow, or will you not? |
A61779 | or a present one, whether it be so or not; as, have you the money I left in your hands, or have you it not? |
A61779 | what is become of Domestick Discipline amongst Christians? |
A65844 | And is not he himself guilty of the same? |
A65844 | And must not we walk in him the New and Living Way, and obey his Commands? |
A65844 | And were not this most grosly to charge Paul with Transgression both of Law and Gospel? |
A65844 | And what is this to the Imposition of Oaths we desired the Parliament to remove? |
A65844 | But when have we refused to pay our Civil- Duties or Taxes, being in a Capacity, that is, out of Bonds and Sufferings, which have disabled many? |
A65844 | But why makes this man such a Difference between the Good Fortune of Caesar, or Caesar''s Prosperity? |
A65844 | Could not he swallow such Camel- Oaths where he allows the use of such Forms, as Swearing by Heaven;& c. because Gods Name is implyed? |
A65844 | Could our Consciences serve us to Conform, Pay Tythes, Uphold Priests,& c. what needed we make Address for Liberty? |
A65844 | Did he therein call them to swear, in saying, If they would testifie? |
A65844 | Neither do we read that the Authors say, That that Charge was denyed by them; and then, what need was there of proving it before it was denyed? |
A65844 | No, said the Bishop, and why? |
A65844 | Secondly, Neither is Swearing by the Health of the Emperor any more warrantable; And did not both these Oaths savour of Heathenism? |
A65844 | Then said the Bishop, Why wilt thou not Swear before a Judge,& c? |
A65844 | This makes for us; for were not promissory Oaths as well as assertory allowed under the Law? |
A65844 | To Swear by Heaven or Jerusalem are Camel- Oaths: What Credit can this man''s Work against us be of? |
A65844 | VVill any presume to say, That he Swore by the Heap of Stones, which was a Witness or a Memorial? |
A65844 | We may ask this, J. S. Where are thy Eyes? |
A65844 | What Evil then is it to swear? |
A65844 | Where is your Conscience, who belye so many,& c? |
A65844 | ],[ London? |
A65844 | and why are men put upon Swearing in their Account for their Tyths, more then in their private Contracts about them? |
A65844 | and yet would not swear but by the God of Truth: Was there no Difference between the Health of a Wicked Persecuting Emperor, and the God of Truth? |
A65844 | or where ever he acknowledg''d himself convinc''d that this was an Error? |
A44801 | ( falsly reputed Christians) and yet abides not in his Doctrine? |
A44801 | 11. for it is written( where? |
A44801 | 63. say,( I adjure thee to tell us whether thou be Christ the Son of God?) |
A44801 | Art thou then the Son of God? |
A44801 | I adjure thee to tell us whether thou art the son of God or not? |
A44801 | It is not the seat of Judgment established in Righteousness and truth? |
A44801 | Swear not at all; doth it overthrow all Justice and Judicatories? |
A44801 | Who doth the greater violence to this Scripture? |
A44801 | and he said unto them, ye say that I am; and Pilate was as much a Magistrate as the high Priest, and he asked art thou the King of the Jewes? |
A44801 | and then what is become of these two great Mysteries as they have been called? |
A44801 | and whether was this a new Institution of Christ, or was it an Institution in the Law? |
A44801 | had Cain peace when he had slain his brother? |
A44801 | had Israel peace when she slew the Prophets? |
A44801 | had the Jewes peace when they had Crucified Christ? |
A44801 | had the Romans peace when they persecuted the first Christians? |
A44801 | if he have but the power of this World on his side? |
A44801 | nothing at all; and what doth this prove which A. S. inserts in his Marginal notes? |
A44801 | or what would not he oppose? |
A44801 | shall not this circumcision become uncircumcision? |
A44801 | shall not this inherit the promise? |
A44801 | the 27. he tells us that the essence of swearing is in calling God to witness, and how or where did Christ call God to witness? |
A44801 | then the Scribes and Pharisees to theirs? |
A59242 | And what Catholick alive will presume to say this? |
A59242 | And what needs Princes desire any greater security( say they) what need they trouble themselves with their Subjects speculative opinions? |
A59242 | And why not good for the Catholick cause? |
A59242 | But alas how groundless is such a fear? |
A59242 | But do not Protestants fear him too? |
A59242 | For by granting only so much, it will necessarily follow? |
A59242 | For( saies he) what needs any oath at all to detect who are Roman Catholicks? |
A59242 | Hereto his adversary is brought in replying And what for Excommunications and absolutions, be they in the princes power also? |
A59242 | How comes it then to pass that they can in England swear that the King is supreme Head and Governour in all causes Ecclesiastical or spirituall? |
A59242 | Is it because the Oath of Supremacy has so peculiar a conformity to their principles, and that of Allegiance to their practises? |
A59242 | Now what Christian at this day alive will make these two Recognitions in the sence aforesaid? |
A59242 | Now who will believe such an Oath as this? |
A59242 | Or rather will they not be esteemed for such an oaths sake, resolved to be disloyal both to God and man? |
A59242 | This is known at Rome and all Christendom over; and yet who dare impute Heresy to them? |
A59242 | Though how can Equivocation be excluded, when according to them one Equivocation may be renounced by another? |
A59242 | What apprehension have the Kings of France, Spain, or the State of Venice from such promises? |
A59242 | What then can be imagined more necessary for a cure to so great a confusion, then to change such inefficacious instruments of Loyalty? |
A59242 | Who can reconcile these things together in such a sence? |
A59242 | Why? |
A59242 | Will he require some to be obedient to Bishops as instituted by Christ, and others to renounce them as Antichristian? |
A59242 | Yea what English Protestant will be willing to make even the Negative Recognition? |
A59242 | or that they are so ready, and pressing to disclaim and condemn all that themselves have done these last twenty years? |
A29790 | A Son of Slaughter at White- Chappel converted to the observation of Fish- days; or an old inveterate Republican turn''d a stiff Assertor of Monarchy? |
A29790 | A right Country Gentleman''s Question I''faith, for the first thing he generally asks you is, What is the News? |
A29790 | And does a Coach and six Horses baffle Heroes, spoil Divines, and make Milksops of Princes? |
A29790 | And is all your mighty News, which you prefaced with so much show and Ceremonie, come to this sorry issue at last? |
A29790 | And what does Interest, meer Interest only do all this? |
A29790 | Any Court- 〈 … 〉 ● ● nen, and no back- biting; any litigious Attorney to 〈 ◊ 〉 And Arbitrations? |
A29790 | Any of the Town Criticks to Modesty? |
A29790 | Any thrice married Widow to impotence? |
A29790 | As the Country Ladies when they come up to Town, enquire in the first place, Which is the newest Play or Lampoon? |
A29790 | But are they all so inveterate? |
A29790 | But may a Man be so happy as to hear you produce any Reasons for what you have said? |
A29790 | But prithee wou''d not you have a man be careful to preserve his Character and Reputation in the World, and study to give as little scandal as may be? |
A29790 | Come tell me now, have I hitupon the true reason or no? |
A29790 | Come then, wert thou ever married, my honest friend? |
A29790 | Conscience do you say? |
A29790 | Crys the Master of the Porcupine, You Rascal, what do you intend by asking me what Sawce I''de have for him? |
A29790 | Dear Sir, your Humble Servant; how have you done this many a fair day, and how long have you been in Town? |
A29790 | Dost thou now comprehend my Meaning? |
A29790 | Got his Reasons ready do you say? |
A29790 | I wou''d desire to know how you make that out, Noble Sir? |
A29790 | Is a 〈 … 〉 ● arlon turn''d a friend to Cleanliness? |
A29790 | Is any noted S ● ● ● ● ian turn''d a Friend to Faith? |
A29790 | Is there then no difference between tolerating and establishing? |
A29790 | Nay the Lord knows, which is Mr. Bay''s Primitive Church; but prithee why dost thou trouble thy head about a Poet''s Religion? |
A29790 | Not married say you? |
A29790 | Of a few Conjugal Sollicitations do you say? |
A29790 | Or any of the Modern Comprehension- men converted to a good Opinion of the poor suffering Ceremonies of the Church? |
A29790 | Or any of the good people of Doctors- Commons to unlicenc ● d Marriges? |
A29790 | Or have any of the topping Sons of Schism by the Bribe of a good Deanry or Bishoprick been converted to the Liturgy? |
A29790 | Or lastly, any Alderman that was begotten on a Bulk, to Heraldry and Pedigrees? |
A29790 | Prithee what story is that, for, to the best of my knowledg, I never heard of it before? |
A29790 | Say you so Tim? |
A29790 | Say you so sir? |
A29790 | Sons of Schism? |
A29790 | The Question is, whether what the Dr. has formerly preached or written, is the true Doctrin of the Church of England or no? |
A29790 | They preserve the Protestant Religion? |
A29790 | To conclude then: Is the Vicar near Charing- Cross convinced there''s not so much Bawdry in the Service of Matrimony as without it? |
A29790 | To proceed then, is the Dr. brought to a better Opinion of the Abdication, or does he go altogether upon the merits of Forefaulture? |
A29790 | VVHo''s that, my old Friend Mr. Freeman, e Comitatu Bucks? |
A29790 | Well then, Granting all you have said to be true, what advantage do you intend to make of it? |
A29790 | Well, and what of all this? |
A29790 | What think you of this now? |
A29790 | What, not one single man amongst the whole Herd, that congratulates the Government for the great Happiness of his Reduction? |
A29790 | When the Fellow was got into his Room at the Inn, he knocks for the Landlord, and asks him whether he had got his Porcupine ready? |
A29790 | Where, or how? |
A29790 | Which is the Topping Mistress of the Court, or the most fashionable Suit of Ribbons at the Exchange? |
A29790 | Who could ever expect that? |
A29790 | Why, prithee Tim, what dost thou take me for, a Prophet, or a Conjurer? |
A29790 | Why, what a Devil did he mean by that question? |
A29790 | or in what Reign, that we may see it registred in our Almanacks? |
A29790 | what a deal of insignificant flourish and preparation is here to usher in, it may be, but a foolish story at last? |
A39572 | ( which with the other amount ▪ to 2000 years in all) were spent and gone even of the new? |
A39572 | 9. all one? |
A39572 | And is not that Law spiritual,( though universal?) |
A39572 | Are they to fashion themselves therefore according to the Nations, as H. D. would have them? |
A39572 | But I say, let him have it this way, Swear not commonly, ordinarily, frequently; What follows? |
A39572 | But what''s this to the few Saints? |
A39572 | But( quoth H. D. as objecting on behalf of his Opponents) how then doth the Text say, Above all things swear not? |
A39572 | Can that be accounted an evil( if not easily undertaken) whereof we have the Lord for a President? |
A39572 | Does God, or did he ever require any man, on pain of exclusion from his holy Hill, to swear to his own hurt? |
A39572 | Doth not the consent of Scripture herein confute the swearing Baptist, while it sayes, Swear not at all, and that the customs of the Nations are vain? |
A39572 | Doth the Baptist say the consent of Nations confutes the Quaker in the point of Swearing, which the Light within him biddeth him to do? |
A39572 | Finally, To H. D''s Question, What thing God did, which can be evil in us if we do it? |
A39572 | How can that be accounted evil which is approved by all Nations? |
A39572 | How say some that there is no resurrection of the dead? |
A39572 | How unlike the Christians in former times are you? |
A39572 | If so, that it relates to the New- Testament, as it s understood by many to do? |
A39572 | Is he ignorant that the world lies in wickedness, 1 Joh: 5. excepting those few who know they are of God? |
A39572 | Is not the Law that''s in Heathens hearts, whereby they are accused or excused, the Law of God, whose Law is Light? |
A39572 | No, said the Bishop; and why? |
A39572 | Now how great is this Authority, namely, the consent of all Nations? |
A39572 | Rep. Dost thou know we will not say it? |
A39572 | Rep. We do not say it is; but if it be not, are there not more wayes out of the wood, as well as into it, then one? |
A39572 | Risum teneatis? |
A39572 | That its worse to swear then to commit Adultery, to kill the King, to kill Father or Mother, and then to appeal to all men whether it be true or no? |
A39572 | Was their consent to be taken for divine evidence, or the dissent rather of those Three? |
A39572 | What Nation so barbarom, but it commits Idolatry, and approves it as good? |
A39572 | What Nation so barbarous, but it will alter, or for fear fore- go the Worsh ● … p of their God, and their Religion, if their Rulers require it? |
A39572 | What gets H. D. then by this? |
A39572 | What''s that to us? |
A39572 | When shall that be? |
A39572 | Who sayes its worse to swear then to commit adultery, to kill the King, to kill Father or Mother? |
A39572 | Who shall heal these distempers? |
A39572 | Why then dost thou so vainly ask whether this be a true Interpretation, which thou knowest not that any body makes? |
A39572 | Will any think this is that water onely that puts away the outward filth of the outward flesh? |
A39572 | [ 2], 78 p. Printed for Robert Wilson..., London:[ 1660?] |
A39572 | and v. 32. why do I fight with Beasts, or beastial spirited men? |
A39572 | and what shall become of Pride, when all sin, which it''s not the least of, is done away? |
A39572 | eng Denne, Henry, 1606 or 7- 1660? |
A39572 | inform us that these general terms must be restrained? |
A39572 | that they shall swear to their own hurt? |
A39572 | where is your first love? |
A39572 | yet will H. D. here call it natural, Natures finger? |
A54581 | A: What do you here intend to refer to? |
A54581 | According to those words in Malachi, If then I be a Father, where is my honour? |
A54581 | And then having brought in his Popish opponents objection, Hem quid audio? |
A54581 | And what is the Reason which the Iudges give of this Resolution? |
A54581 | And will your Lordships allow this ecclesiastical Head no ecclesiastical Senses? |
A54581 | But I should be glad to know whether it made any fermentation in the Body of the People Representative, and what was the Result of it? |
A54581 | But doth that Explanation of the Regal Power assert any thing in Defence of the Dispensative part of it? |
A54581 | But were not their Consciences extremely erroneous who thought themselves bound then to advance Religion by War? |
A54581 | But will you then tell me of Disability being thus tacitly dispens''d with, and with a salvo to Conscience as to the obligation of humane Laws? |
A54581 | But( I beseech you) did not the Protestant Divines of the Church of Scotland then cry out of the unlawfulness or inexpedience of that Dispensation? |
A54581 | But( by the way) do you think then that Sovereign Princes offend the Law of God in Pardoning Murther? |
A54581 | Can you guess whence it is that men have imbibed this mistaken fancy? |
A54581 | Can you readily now at this time give any instance of the House of Commons th ● … n doing any thing of that Nature? |
A54581 | Did Sir William Iones maintain the King''s Power of Dispensing with Acts of Parliament? |
A54581 | Did the Parliament acquiesce in what the King had done as aforesaid? |
A54581 | Did they offend any other Uncontroverted Rights of the Crown? |
A54581 | Do you account it to have any great spreading Influence on mens Consciences here in keeping them both innocent and quiet? |
A54581 | Have you this Matter of Fact out of any of the Records in England or Scotland? |
A54581 | It seem''d very necessary in the judgment of our Governors then? |
A54581 | No Ecclesiastical Persons to be censulted with at all? |
A54581 | No not in any Circumstances of time and place? |
A54581 | No? |
A54581 | Or did the late Kings Loyal long Parliament do so in their obtaining the Act for the Habeas Corpus, and others that might be named? |
A54581 | W ● … at account doth Mr. Prynne give of that? |
A54581 | Was that Speech of the Archbishop ever printed? |
A54581 | Was that all the favour he shew''d Roman- Catholicks? |
A54581 | What a Concatenation of Perjuries was our Land so long enslaved with? |
A54581 | What? |
A54581 | Whether a mere Lay- man no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Register, contrary to an Act of Parliament? |
A54581 | Whether a mere Lay- man, no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Chancellor, and so may Excommunicate? |
A54581 | Whom do you mean by those? |
A54581 | what had become of that great work of our Reformation in this flourishing Church of England? |
A69826 | Do you use to swear such as make no Conscience? |
A69826 | Guilty, or not guilty? |
A69826 | Have not they that liberty which others are debarr''d of? |
A69826 | How came I here, if you know not? |
A69826 | How can I help my self when you have out- lawed me? |
A69826 | I am upon the point; Will not my pleading deprive me of the benefit of the Law? |
A69826 | I desire to be heard; Where is mine Accuser? |
A69826 | I have been about six weeks in Prison, and am I now called to accuse my self? |
A69826 | If any have wronged you, take your course in Law; will you swear? |
A69826 | If it be not drawn to execute Judgment, will not the God of Justice draw his Sword of displeasure? |
A69826 | If this be true, then for shame swear men no more: if words be sufficient to bind, what need Oaths? |
A69826 | If you plead not, the Indictment will be found against you: Will you answer? |
A69826 | Is this the Iudgment of the whole Court? |
A69826 | Is this the Judgment of the Court? |
A69826 | It is no matter of Conscience, Guilty or not Guilty? |
A69826 | J. C. By what Law have you power to tender it? |
A69826 | J. C. Is this Canting, to speak the words of the Scripture? |
A69826 | Mr. Crook, If you will answer you may plead for your self, or will you take the Oath? |
A69826 | Mr. Crook, you must not be your own Iudge, we are your Iudges; but for our parts we will not wrong you: Will you answer Guilty, or not Guilty? |
A69826 | Mr. Grey, will you take the Oath? |
A69826 | My Case is not theirs, yet they have their Accusers; and may not I call for mine? |
A69826 | No more ado, the form is nothing, Guilty, or not? |
A69826 | Now what virtue is wanting in him that doth speak the truth without dissimulation, but dare not swear at all? |
A69826 | Shall not the Righteous God do Righteously? |
A69826 | Sirrah, Guilty, or not guilty? |
A69826 | The Court takes no notice how you came hither; What say you, will you answer? |
A69826 | The next day Isaac Grey was called to the Bar, and asked by the Judge, if he would yet take the Oath? |
A69826 | Then we cryed out, Will you not give us leave to speak for our selves? |
A69826 | We do ask you again, whether you will take the Oath of Allegiance? |
A69826 | We take no notice of your Imprisonment, nor how you came here; Will you take the Oath? |
A69826 | What Meeting was that you were at? |
A69826 | What do you talk to us of Conscience? |
A69826 | What though no man tendred the Oath to you when you were committed( as you say) it being now tendred to you? |
A69826 | When did you take the Oath of Allegiance? |
A69826 | Where''s the Sword of Justice that should not be born in vain, but used for the punishment of evil- doers, and for the praise of them that do well? |
A69826 | Will you answer, Guilty or not Guilty? |
A69826 | Will you answer, Guilty, or not Guilty? |
A69826 | Will you hear me? |
A69826 | Will you not stand to your own Iudgments? |
A69826 | Will you plead, Guilty, or not Guilty? |
A69826 | Will you speak to the Indictment? |
A69826 | Will you take the Oath of Allegiance? |
A69826 | Will you yet swear, or plead to the Indictment? |
A69826 | Would you have men swear whether they will or nay, especially when against their Conscience? |
A69826 | Yes, if there be new matter; or, if there fall out any emergent occasion, whereby you minister on your part new occasion: Mr. Crook, will you swear? |
A69826 | You are a saucy and an impudent fellow; will you tell us what is Law, or our duties? |
A69826 | and therefore call for them, for you ought to do so, as Christ said to the Woman,( Woman, where are thine Accusers?) |
A69826 | and when he utters his Voice, will not the Beasts of the Field tremble? |
A69826 | and, when were any of them convicted by vertue of any of these Laws, though made principally for them? |
A69826 | are they haled out of their Meetings by armed men without Warrant or Order, as the People called Quakers, and others, are? |
A69826 | are you Guilty, or not Guilty? |
A69826 | for, if you will not be just to your selves and your own Iudgments, how can I expect you should be just to me? |
A69826 | so you ought to say to me,( Man, where are thine Accusers?) |
A54142 | And can we reasonably think the Romanists will be wanting in that, when they see it is their own( and perhaps their only) Interest to do so? |
A54142 | And if it be so, what can it do? |
A54142 | And if they say, O but they were in Error that punish''d their Non- conformity; I answer, how can she prove that she is Infallibly in the Right? |
A54142 | And is not this a Rare Motive for a Christian Church to continue Penal Laws for Religion? |
A54142 | And what are they? |
A54142 | Are there Tares in Opinion? |
A54142 | Are we afraid of their Power and yet provoke it? |
A54142 | But may I without Offence ask her, when she kept Persecution out? |
A54142 | But what need we go so far back? |
A54142 | But, Is it not an odd thing, that by leaving them on foot, every Body shall have Liberty of Conscience but the Goverment? |
A54142 | Could they Conscientiously oppose his Exclusion for his Religion, and now his Religion because he will not leave it? |
A54142 | Did Christ then come to save Mens Lives, and not to destroy them? |
A54142 | Does he seek to impose his own Religion upon her? |
A54142 | He condemned that Spirit in his Disciples, and shall we uphold the same Spirit, and that by Law too, which he condemned by his Gospel? |
A54142 | How can she be sincerely willing that should be done, that she is not willing should be done legally? |
A54142 | How could she hope for this King without his Conscience? |
A54142 | How? |
A54142 | I apply it thus: Is it not her Interest to be careful she does it not a second time? |
A54142 | I believe there may be some poor silly Biggots that hope bigger, and talk further, but who can help that? |
A54142 | I have been often scandal''d at that Expression from the Sons of the Church of England, especially those of the Robe, What do you talk for? |
A54142 | Is it their Property to do so? |
A54142 | Is it unjust in Popery to invade her Priviledges, and can it be just in her to provoke it, by denying a Christian Liberty? |
A54142 | Is not this doing Evil that Good may come of it, and that uncertain too, against an express Command as well as common Charity? |
A54142 | Is this against Protestancy? |
A54142 | Is this an Immitation of their practice, to uphold the Weapons of their Destruction? |
A54142 | Let the Tears and Wheat grow together till the Harvest; what''s that? |
A54142 | Let us not then usurp their Office Besides, we are to Love Enemies; this is the great Law of our Religion; by what Law then are we to Persecute them? |
A54142 | O what Corruption is this that has prevail''d over Men of such Pretensions to Light and Conscience? |
A54142 | Or if she keeps out Popery for any bodies sake but her own? |
A54142 | Or to exclude those from her Society who may be admitted into Heaven? |
A54142 | Shall the Church of England, that glories in a great Light, be more concern''d for her Power, than her Credit? |
A54142 | She pretends to fear the Strokes of the Romanists, but I would fain know of her, if following their Example will convert them, or secure her? |
A54142 | Should they not be pluckt up before? |
A54142 | Suppose this, is there not as Potent Naval Powers to assist the Constitution of the Kingdom from such Invasions? |
A54142 | Suppose your Apprehensions well grounded, you can but be Destroy''d; Which is most comfortable for you to suffer by Law or without it? |
A54142 | They shall think, says he to his Disciples, they do God good service to kill you; who should think so? |
A54142 | To be, than to be that which she should be? |
A54142 | Was not Religion sufficiently guarded and fenced in ● hem? |
A54142 | Was there ever more true and cordial Reverence in the Worship of God? |
A54142 | Well, but if we must not knock Folks on the Head, what must we do with them? |
A54142 | What Charter hath Christ given the Church to bind men up to more than himself hath done? |
A54142 | What ground can there be why Christians should not stand upon the same terms now which they did in the time of Christ and his Apostles? |
A54142 | What then has befallen her, that she changes the course she took with such resolutions of perseverance? |
A54142 | What then is the matter? |
A54142 | What then is the use of Penal Laws? |
A54142 | What weight is it to a Church, that she is the Church by Law established, when no humane Law can make a true Church? |
A54142 | Where is Faith in God? |
A54142 | Who art Thou( saith he) who dost judge another? |
A54142 | Will she Dissent from both now? |
A54142 | and should she( she I say, that pretends to be a reformed Church) uphold those Laws that do destroy them? |
A54142 | as if he should have said, dost thou know thy self, what thou art, and what thou dost? |
A54142 | is it not recent in memory, that Bishop Vsher was Employ''d to O. Cromwell by some of the Clergy of the Church of England for Liberty of Conscience? |
A54142 | or can she expect what she will not give? |
A54142 | or conceive that his Honour or Conscience would let him leave the Members of his Communion under the lash of so many Destroying Laws? |
A54142 | or not do as she would be done by, because she fears others will not observe the same Rule to her? |
A54142 | where is trust in Providence? |
A54142 | with Penal Laws? |
A54142 | would she be so serv''d by a Prince of her own Religion, and she in the like Circumstances? |
A02913 | & all the people must say so be it: was God thus jealous of Moses ordinances, ād is the lesse jelous of Christs? |
A02913 | ? |
A02913 | A. Doth not Christ in the parrable Teach that he compelled all to come in? |
A02913 | A. Doth not the Prophet say: that Kings shal be nursing Fathers& Queenes nursing Mothers to the Church? |
A02913 | A. Hath not all the Learned of the Land considered of these things,& set thē dovvne, are such simple men as you likely to see more then all these? |
A02913 | A. Hath not the King the same ● ovver that the Kings of Israel had who cōpelled mē to the observation of the lavv of God? |
A02913 | And can any serve Christ and the Beast, God and the Dragon? |
A02913 | And vvhy may not wee followe his example? |
A02913 | Are all without exception in this feareful estate to bee cast into the laike that burneth with fire and brimstone? |
A02913 | But Moses sayd vnto them, Shall your brethren goe to warre and ye tarie here? |
A02913 | But are men left then to their owne free will? |
A02913 | But do they teach their hearers to hate vaine inventions and love Gods Law? |
A02913 | But if this be granted/ this question ariseth who shal then baptize after Antichrists exaltation? |
A02913 | But one thinge I demaunde of you, who now is King of Israel? |
A02913 | But what doe you then hold of infants? |
A02913 | C. I demaund of you wherewith doth he compel them? |
A02913 | C. Then, I demaund this question, whether every Christiā without respect of persons ought not to bee subject to Christs Lawes for his salvation? |
A02913 | C. Wel, then I demand, hath the fleshly childr 〈 … 〉 of the faithfull, more previlege to life and salvation then the faithful themselves? |
A02913 | C. What authoritie can any mortall Man require more, then of bodie, goods, life, and all that apperteyneth to the outward Man? |
A02913 | C. What doe you meane by free will? |
A02913 | C. What thē: is it therefore Chr: baptisme? |
A02913 | C. Wherefore should they be condemned? |
A02913 | C. You say true: then for that sin, God never purposed to condemne Adam to hell: if not him for that, why any of his posteritie for that? |
A02913 | C. what then/ Is not his practice written for our instruction? |
A02913 | Cā a theife that hath stolne goods, repent thereof to acceptance with God, and not make restitutiō to the party wronged? |
A02913 | Christ or Antichrist? |
A02913 | Did God ever purpose or declare, that Adam for that transgression should goe to hell? |
A02913 | Do not the Bbs: herein justifie this accursed doctrine and practice in the Papists? |
A02913 | Further did not that Southsayer Balaam, teach excellent truths? |
A02913 | Helwys, Thomas, 1550?-1616?, attributed name. |
A02913 | How comes it then that some do beleeve/ and some do not? |
A02913 | How long Lord? |
A02913 | I demaund of you, did any of Adams posteritie fall deeper in that trāsgression then he himself? |
A02913 | I demaund/ doth the Lord require no more worke of them? |
A02913 | I. I can not contradict you in this, I will better cōsider of it, but I pray you what hold you then of Predestination? |
A02913 | I. I confesse these iudgments are to be trembled at/ but how do you apply them properly to such as worship in these assemblies? |
A02913 | I. I praise God you have given me great satisfaction in these things/ what must we do after our baptisme? |
A02913 | If men hold errors& vvill not obey the truth, do they not sin against God,& deserve punishment? |
A02913 | If vvicked malefactors should bee let allone to the end of the vvorld, then vvhere is the Magistrats svvorde? |
A02913 | Is Gods Church thus planted? |
A02913 | Is this all the authority that you vvill give to the King? |
A02913 | May none be admitted to the Church/ to pertake in the ordinances, except they be baptized? |
A02913 | May we say/ the Religion of the Philo ● ● phers was good because of their morall ver ● es? |
A02913 | Next/ after forsaking the wayes of wickednes/ and imbraceing Christ for our righteousnes what must wee do? |
A02913 | Shall they not escape damnatiō for this accursed doctrine and practice, ād thinke you you shall? |
A02913 | So may I say, whether is greater the water and washinge, or the word that sanctifies the water? |
A02913 | Thou that teachest another, teachest thou not they selff? |
A02913 | VVhy come you not to Church? |
A02913 | Vnto the wicked said God, what haist thou to do with my ordināces? |
A02913 | Were not blasphemers put to death in time of he lavv? |
A02913 | What do you meane by wil not heare? |
A02913 | What iff I should many times go through weaknes? |
A02913 | What other example have you in the scriptures, that on vnbaptized person may baptise? |
A02913 | What should I do there? |
A02913 | ],[ The Netherlands? |
A02913 | and as the lord saith: Iff I be your maister, where is my feare? |
A02913 | and was not reformation wrought hereby? |
A02913 | ād did not they that preached in Christs name cast out Devils, and do many and great workes? |
A02913 | doth he not requyre that they should help to cast downe Babell? |
A02913 | must he die that dispiseth Moses law, and shal he escape that dispiseth Christs? |
A02913 | or do Christs Disciples thus plant? |
A02913 | or if he could not have resisted God in eating the forbidden fruit/ how could God have manifested his mercie to him in Christ? |
A02913 | the offering, or the altar that sanctifieth the offering? |
A02913 | thou that judgest another, judgest them not thy self? |
A02913 | was Israels sin halfe so great as Iudahs? |
A02913 | who are more confidēt of their good estate with God then the Papists, notwithstanding al their grosse abhominations? |
A02913 | who hath set vp his new way? |
A02913 | wil not Christ Iesus pronounce absolutely either salvation or condemnation to every one? |
A02913 | ● nd whither did our Saviour flie/ when the ● ime came that he was to shewe himselfe to Israell? |
A04286 | 4 What other thing feared Frederick Barbarossa but Excommuniticaon? |
A04286 | And aboue alll, how frankly and freely did I free Recusants of their ordinary payments? |
A04286 | And as for suppressing of the Scriptures how many hundreth yeeres were the people kept in such blindnesse, as these witnesses were almost vnknowne? |
A04286 | And how could all the Apostles haue otherwise vsed all their censures, only in Christs Name, and neuer a word of his Vicar? |
A04286 | And last of all, by what inspiration could he foretell whereupon hee was to bee accused? |
A04286 | And since Ipse dixit; nay, ter dixit, per quem facta sunt omnia, what mortall man dare interprete him otherwise; nay, directly contrary? |
A04286 | And what blasphemous corrupting of Scripture is it, to turne Dominus into Domina throughout the whole Psalmes? |
A04286 | And what is this to say? |
A04286 | But first we must know what kinde of touching of Christs body drew a vertue from it; whether euery touching, or only touching by faith? |
A04286 | But what cause gaue I him to farce his whole booke with iniuries, both against my person and booke? |
A04286 | But who can wonder at this contradiction of himselfe in this point, when his owne great Volumes are so filled with contradictions? |
A04286 | But whose hatred did he feare in this? |
A04286 | But why should I presume any more to interprete Malachy, since it is sufficient that CHRIST himselfe hath interpreted him so? |
A04286 | Did hee not accept of the conditions to poyson the man, and had his pay? |
A04286 | Doeth he that taketh it, promise there to beleeue, or not to beleeue any article of Religion? |
A04286 | For as for the Catholique faith; can there bee one word found in all that Oath, tending or sounding to matter of Religion? |
A04286 | For if he thinke himselfe my lawfull Iudge, wherefore hath he condemned me vnheard? |
A04286 | For what exampl ● is there in all the Scripture, in which disobedi ● nce to the Oath of the King, or want of allegiance is allowed? |
A04286 | Had not wee then, and our Parliament great reason, by this Oath to set a marke of distinction betweene good Subiects and bad? |
A04286 | Haue I euer importuned the Pope with any request for my securitie? |
A04286 | How free& continual accesse, had all rankes& degrees of Papists in my Court& company? |
A04286 | How indifferently did I giue audience, and accesse to both sides, bestowing equally all fauours and honors on both professions? |
A04286 | How many Emperors did the Pope raise warre against in their owne bowels? |
A04286 | How many did I honour with knighthood, of knowen& open Recusants? |
A04286 | I that in the yeere of GOD 84 erected Bishops, and depressed all their popular Paritie, I then being not 18. yeeres of age? |
A04286 | If the Breues[ of Clement] did not exclude mee from the Kingdome, but rather did include me, why did Garnet burne them? |
A04286 | Is not this to confound CHRISTS person with hers? |
A04286 | Or doeth he so much as name a true or a false Church there? |
A04286 | Or haue I either troubled other Christian Princes my friends& allies, to intreat for me at the Popes hand? |
A04286 | Or yet haue I begged from them any aide or assistance for my farther securitie? |
A04286 | Was neuer Chistian Emperour or King afraid of the Popes? |
A04286 | Was not the a Emperour afraid, who b waited bare- footed in the frost and snow three dayes at the Popes gate, before hee could get entrie? |
A04286 | Was not the c Emperour also afraide, d who was driuen to lie agroofe on his belly, and suffer another Pope to tread vpon his necke? |
A04286 | What certaine information had he then receiued vpon the particulars, whereupon hee was to be accused? |
A04286 | What could hee know, that the said Arch- priest was not taken vpon suspicion of his guiltinesse in the Powder- Treason? |
A04286 | What did k Alexander the third write to the Soldan? |
A04286 | What need such wilde racked Commentaries for such three wordes? |
A04286 | Who haue interest, but KINGS, in the withdrawing of true Subiection from Kings? |
A04286 | f Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith, Iulian was an vnbeleeuing Emperour: was he not an Apostata, an Oppressour, and an Idolater? |
A04286 | f Quis me constituit Iudicem super vos? |
A04286 | was it not yours? |
A04286 | why would he not reserue them that I might haue seene them, that so he might haue obtained more fauour at mine hands, for him and his Catholickes? |
A09102 | And are not other Catholicks deliuered from the guylt therof, by the long, and diligent search of Iustice made thereabout? |
A09102 | And are not these goodly definitions( thinke you) for so great and graue a man to produce? |
A09102 | And can any thing be spoken more cleerly for vs, and for our cause, then this? |
A09102 | And did not they cyte many places of Scriptures, to proue the equity& necessity therof? |
A09102 | And do not all Protestants the like at this day, in all places, where they are, both in Polonia, Austria, Hungaria, Bohemia, Styria, and els where? |
A09102 | And do these words last adioyned make any thing at all for our Apologer? |
A09102 | And how can these things be defended with any shew or probability of truth? |
A09102 | And how then are these, and such other places brought in for witnesse, as though they had somwhat to say against vs? |
A09102 | And how then can this Apologer talke so much of equality vsed in all fauours? |
A09102 | And how then is Cardinall Bellarmyne said heere to be no lesse contrary to God, concerning Kings Authority, then light to darknes, and heauen to hell? |
A09102 | And how then, is all this ascribed to the Pope, which proceeded from the Some against his Father? |
A09102 | And how thē is Iordanis conuersus retrorsum, with this Minister? |
A09102 | And how thē shall we cleare this importāt matter, VVhether there be any pointes in this Oath belonging to religion, besydes Cyuill Obedience? |
A09102 | And is this good dealing? |
A09102 | And is this so absurd doctrine? |
A09102 | And may a man thinke this to be true or likely, that so rude a proposition should come from Bellarmine? |
A09102 | And was not this a great in felicity? |
A09102 | And were it not a great synne to increase the same, by casting in oyle to augmēt the flame? |
A09102 | And what an abuse of his Maiesties mercie and clemencie, to expect libertie of Conscience? |
A09102 | And what will the Apologer say heere? |
A09102 | And wherin thē? |
A09102 | And why then are men kept in prison, after they haue taken this Oath? |
A09102 | And why then is this so vniustly layed vpon the Pope? |
A09102 | And why was all this, but for their Religion? |
A09102 | And will not the Catholicks of England vse this speach also vnto their King? |
A09102 | Are they not all gates of Hell? |
A09102 | Are they not executed, that were culpable therof? |
A09102 | Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith thus: Iulian was an vnbelieuing Emperour, was he not an Apostata? |
A09102 | But I would aske him wherin? |
A09102 | But alas, is there no end of exprobration against the Innocent for the Nocent? |
A09102 | But if a man would aske him, how he can proue, that those things were so directly inioyned, and plainly authorized, what answere will he make? |
A09102 | But what is this vnto our Oath? |
A09102 | But what man is so simple, or sil ● y, that will not presently demaund, how we shall know the certaynty, when Antichrist is to come? |
A09102 | But what? |
A09102 | Did S. Ambrose by this acknowledge that the Emperour had higher Authority, then he, in Church- matters? |
A09102 | Doth this man care what he saith? |
A09102 | First this: As for the Catholicke Religion( saith he) can there be one word found in all this Oath, tending to matter of Religion? |
A09102 | For approbation of matters cōcerning faith? |
A09102 | For how shall the Reader try the truth of this obiection? |
A09102 | For that this, perhaps, is called the Oath of Allegiance? |
A09102 | For what more dishonorable infelicity can there be, then that which standeth in Capito Libri of Q. Elizabeths lyfe? |
A09102 | Had it not bene more plaine dealing to haue alleadged some one sentence, or conclusion contradictory to the other? |
A09102 | How can he say, that there was no persecution before the powder- treason? |
A09102 | How can the Apologer defend himself in this place, from willfull exaggeration, and voluntary mistaking? |
A09102 | How is his voyce contrary to the voyce& sense of all the rest? |
A09102 | How is this against him? |
A09102 | How thē doth the Apologer so grosly forget, and contradict himself, euen then, when he goeth about to proue contradictions in his Aduersary? |
A09102 | If it be vnlawfull, why hath he not expressed any one cause or reason therof? |
A09102 | Is not Recusancie a cause of Conscience? |
A09102 | Is not this good dealing? |
A09102 | Is nothing promised in those wordes to be belieued, or not to be belieued? |
A09102 | Is this a token of want of better matter, or no? |
A09102 | Is this good dealing? |
A09102 | May he, in truth, be said to ● rouch, that an Emperor must be cōtēt to drinke after a Bishops Chaplin? |
A09102 | No commiseration? |
A09102 | No compassion? |
A09102 | Nunquid non omnes portae Inferi? |
A09102 | Or doth this iustify the Apologers outragious proposition, That Bellarmyne affirmeth Kings to be rather slaues then Lordes? |
A09102 | Or how doth this shew any such ordinary tricke of falshood in the Cardinal, not in one or two, but in all his citations? |
A09102 | Or may not we deliuer our Iudges of England, from the cryme of murther, though many mens deathes haue proceeded from them, by way of Iustice? |
A09102 | Or rather agree they not fitly to the purpose of the Cardinals exhortation, though for breuityes sake he left them out? |
A09102 | Or why is this submission made? |
A09102 | Shall he be bound to read all Bellarmynes fiue bookes, to see whether it be true or no? |
A09102 | The Sonne of such a Mother, as held her selfe much beholden to English Catholicks? |
A09102 | The second thus: Doth he that taketh it, promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of Religion? |
A09102 | To take any Oath that the Emperour Charles should propose vnto them? |
A09102 | Were they not all for lyberty of Conscience? |
A09102 | What Author can he bring for it, that auoucheth the same? |
A09102 | What enemy of Christian Religion might not cauill, and calumniate this? |
A09102 | What fault hath Cardinall Bellarmine heere in alledging the words, and iudgement of S. Chrysostome? |
A09102 | What i ● he neuer knew of any such attempt? |
A09102 | What is height of pryde and so ● l ●, i ● this be not? |
A09102 | What was Nero? |
A09102 | What would he haue done, or said, if he had bene pressed with an Oath against his Conscience, or any least poynt of his Religion? |
A09102 | Wherin then, or why are they said to haue submitted themselues? |
A09102 | Wherin then, or why is this submission, or rather remission to the Emperour, and his iudgmēt? |
A09102 | Who knoweth not, that the fayrest tytle is put vpon the fowlest matter, when it is to be persuaded or exacted? |
A09102 | Who seeth not the iniustice of this manner of dealing? |
A09102 | Who seeth not this violēt inforcemēt? |
A09102 | Who would not be ashamed of this intemperate accusation? |
A09102 | Why are M. Blackwell, and M. Charnocke deteyned styll by the L. of Canterbury? |
A09102 | Why are Recusants punished,& fyned for Recusancy, though they take the Oath of Allegiance? |
A09102 | Why had he not obiected in like manner, that they expected the libertie of breathing, and vsing the common ayre, as well as Protestants? |
A09102 | an oppressor, and an Idolatour? |
A09102 | he had reason to complayne of Catholicks sufferance, or no? |
A09102 | quid Dioclesianus? |
A09102 | quid denique iste, quihoc tēpore Ecclesiam persequitur? |
A09102 | so pretended, so printed, so published, so diuulged to the world? |
A09102 | tie, acknowledging him to be their liege Lord and King,& inferiour only to god in his Temporall Gouernment? |
A09102 | what desyre is here descried of calumniation? |
A09102 | what is he who at this tyme, doth persecute the Church? |
A09102 | what was Dioclesian? |
A01076 | 10 Whether such supposed succession were afixed to the place, or aplied to the persons? |
A01076 | 11 Whether if the succession were applied to the place, was it not cut off and discontinued when there was no vniuersall Bishop refiant at Rome? |
A01076 | 5 Whether St. Peter ever came at Rome? |
A01076 | 6 Allowing that St. Peter was at Rome, was he not there as an Apostle and so no more appropriate to that place then to the whole world? |
A01076 | 7 Being an Apostle, how came he to be chiefe, yea the vniuersall Pastor over both Iewes and Gentiles? |
A01076 | And will P. R. the Iesuite, and the rest of the English Catholikes of the Romish faction abide by this word in good earnest? |
A01076 | Beyond all this the pondering of such seuerall considerations, to whose brest, or trust are they recommended? |
A01076 | But how doth he convey and conster that part of the oath as concerning the Popes Authority, in dealing with temporall Princes? |
A01076 | But how doth his outward man manage these difficulties? |
A01076 | Christ professed himselfe, and so instructed his Disciples, to bee humble and meeke, but how doth the Pope tread that path? |
A01076 | Dareth he to abide by this? |
A01076 | Doeth not the inferiour members, patiently, and without repugnance, beare all the offences and surcharges, descending vpon them from the head? |
A01076 | Doth he imagine by such his initigation to persuade the King and Realme to tolleration? |
A01076 | God permitteth not the diuell to haue power to destroy the elect and faithfull? |
A01076 | Hath hee not well collected and conected his propositions to bring out this grand conclusion of superiority ouer Princes? |
A01076 | Hath shee left any such Law or libertie, that in any respects the childe may renounce or disclaime his parents? |
A01076 | Hee that hath a power over Hell it selfe, shall not he commaund and over- rule the earth? |
A01076 | Here is goodly building of Castles in the ayre, Castles did I say? |
A01076 | Is not this the very same water of the same Cesterne? |
A01076 | Is there in Nature any so much as desire( much lesse meanes) of remoouing or repressing of the Head? |
A01076 | Is this so great an impietie thinke you? |
A01076 | Marke how they compell our Sauiour Iesus Christ to sallogize against himselfe? |
A01076 | Next vnto the body it selfe, is the issue and off- spring of the bodie, what bounds of dutie hath nature made of the children towards the Father? |
A01076 | Of what he may do, and what he may not doe? |
A01076 | Secondly, God may permit Popes( as Popes) to hold hereticall doctrine, but not to decree it, where shall wee finde consistendi locum? |
A01076 | Shall I coniecture at his conceite in concealing or withdrawing of these words? |
A01076 | Shall I thinke that he hath never read, or vtterly forgotten the Oath of Supremacy? |
A01076 | Then what will they say, or do, to free his Majestie from feares and ielousies? |
A01076 | What moderate meaning hath he found for the safegard of the Catholike consciences that haue taken that oath? |
A01076 | What shall we think he meaneth by proceeding against the Temporall gouernor? |
A01076 | Where shall we find more representatiue obedience of Natures intentions and operations, then in these originals and fountaines of Loue? |
A01076 | Why? |
A01076 | Will you examine another degree of the opperation of Nature? |
A01076 | and so consequently a question, whether the latter diuised Titles be likewise authorized from Christ? |
A01076 | and what is this limitation? |
A01076 | and what 〈 ◊ 〉 they make for Pope Ioane, whose stay standeth vnrefuted? |
A01076 | are they not euery one wholly and absolutely in the Popes discretion? |
A01076 | being declared not as positiue out of the word, but expository, by a sence which the Pope assumeth? |
A01076 | called the subiects of the Catholike Church? |
A01076 | except such his Pastorship were rather Apostolicall then Episcopall? |
A01076 | for feare that his Holinesse be questioned and limited in his owne powre and preeminence? |
A01076 | is it incident and appropriate to his Princely Scepter, to mayntaine the religion now established in his Dominions? |
A01076 | making in the meane time no Religion of the limitting, lessening, and detracting from the Soveraignes Title and pre- eminence? |
A01076 | must not they refuse to sweare vnto that clause of recognition also? |
A01076 | or if hee haue such a Rule ouer Princes themselues, why not also ouer the Subordinate Officers of the Kingdome? |
A01076 | that professeth learning, who well knoweth that wee will presently deny the Popish to be the Catholike Church? |
A01076 | that we haue not departed from the Church? |
A01076 | when hee hath such an argument ab authoritate to a rest him to stand vnto it? |
A01076 | which for some hundreths of yeares after Christ, and since the vsurpation Papall for a long time together hath come to passe? |
A01076 | will Religion allow him more liberty against the highest, then against the meaner Substitutes? |
A01076 | yea, though the father should( as oft as out of iudgement hee doth) cast off or disinherite his sonne? |
A20647 | 11 The blood of the Martyres was the milke which nourished the Primitiue Church, in her infancy, and shall it be too hard for our digestion now? |
A20647 | 112 Where then shall we hope, that these men will stoppe or limit their blasphemies? |
A20647 | 14 And( to proceede farther in Christs Instruction) are these things said of you for Christs sake? |
A20647 | 15 Is there not a Decretall amongst you, by which it Is made Treason to offend a Cardinall? |
A20647 | 18 Was it not Prodigium Obedientiae, as Sedulius iustly calles it, in Fryar Ruffin to go preach naked? |
A20647 | 22 And what is your recompence? |
A20647 | 22 Why therefore shall not the French, and Italian, and olde English lawes giue occasion of Martyrdome in the same cases, as these new lawes shall? |
A20647 | 27 And is there any Charitie in this Doctrine, or in this act of Refusall? |
A20647 | 30 And was not this your case, before the Breues came? |
A20647 | 32 VVhen any of these reasons inuite them, how small causes are sufficient to awake and call vp this temporall Authoritie? |
A20647 | 37 And haue not you beene proceeded with, in Ordinarie course of Iustice, as Traytors, for Rebellions, and Conspiracies, and Tumults? |
A20647 | 38 Or was the Author thereof no good Catholicke? |
A20647 | 38 What high stiles did many Christian and Orthodoxe Emperours assume to themselues? |
A20647 | 42 And is it not a stange precipitation to vow their helpe to all his errours? |
A20647 | 47 If they doe thus much when they are Serui papae, what will they doe when they are famuli? |
A20647 | 5 And is there any matter of Faith in this Decretall? |
A20647 | 9 With how much curiositie and vnescapablenesse their formes of Abiuration vnder oath are exhibited? |
A20647 | After a dead Dogge, and after a Flea?) |
A20647 | And are you as sure that there are Breues, as that there is a law? |
A20647 | And can you produce Authors of any elder times, then within sixe hundred yeares, to haue concurr''d in this? |
A20647 | And do they which alleadge for the Popes Supremacy ouer Princes, intend the Pope to be Gouernour of all Creatures? |
A20647 | And how farre, may this courage and libertie carie vs, if the Prince command any thing in detriment of our soule? |
A20647 | And how hath he decreed it? |
A20647 | And is there any thing found in either of them, which may be a precedent to this mission? |
A20647 | And of Inhumanity, when he was sorry, if any body loued him? |
A20647 | And of desperate prouocation, when he heard of a plague likely to be in those parts, to make a vow to visit those which were infected? |
A20647 | And of murmuring, when he grudged and grieued, That he could find out no veniall sinne in himselfe? |
A20647 | And were there not some degrees of spirituall pride in Gonzaga, who is praised because he had a paire of patched hose in Delicijs? |
A20647 | And what is this Essentiall truth so euident out of Scripture, which designes the Catholique Church? |
A20647 | And wil they from this argue in Constantine a power, to open and shut hel gates? |
A20647 | And will they endanger al those Catholique authors to this eternall damnation, which haue violated this Donation of Constantine by publique bookes? |
A20647 | Are not many of you d parted ● ro ● your promise in baptisme to our Chu ● ch? |
A20647 | Are you as sure that these Breues, or that any Breues can binde your Conscience in this Case, as you were before, that the law could? |
A20647 | Are you( if you be called Traytors for refusing the Oath) reproued for anie part of his Commandements? |
A20647 | At least why should Campian, and those which were executed before these new statutes, be any better Martyres then they? |
A20647 | Because( saies he) if it were affoorded Christ ● belongs it not to his Church, which is bone of his bone? |
A20647 | But how shall wee beleeue that these miracles are from God, or that he doth them in testimony of that mans sanctity? |
A20647 | But to whom shall these men be subiect in the meane time? |
A20647 | But what? |
A20647 | By what way then, and at what time came this Authoritie into them, if it were once out? |
A20647 | Christ appointed twelue, whom hee might send to Preach; but what? |
A20647 | Did the Popes in their Bulls, intimate any illegitimation, or vsurpation, or touch vpon any such statute? |
A20647 | Doth he gouerne Sea, and Elements? |
A20647 | For since the Pope is the Church, how can you diuide the Church from the Court? |
A20647 | Hee Preached Christ; And what did hee Preach of him? |
A20647 | How lame then and vnperfect is this spirituall principality, which can affoord but one halfe? |
A20647 | How man ● Kings are Saints? |
A20647 | Is it for any of these, that you say, A Clergy man can not be a traytor, though he rebell ● because he is no subiect? |
A20647 | Is it for hauing established a Primacy vpon that Bishoppe, aboue his fellow Patriarches, which was so long litigious? |
A20647 | Is not ciuill obedience either really or by intention and implication sworne by euery subiect to the King in his birth, and after? |
A20647 | Is there any charitie to the Church, or partie, or faction, which you haue in this Kingdom? |
A20647 | Is there any to your self? |
A20647 | It was the seede of the Church, out of which we sprung; and shall wee grudge to Tithe our selues to God, in any proportion that hee will accept? |
A20647 | Not but that they confesse, that there are also some other wayes besides martyrdome to escape Purgatorie; else how got Lypsius so soone to heauen? |
A20647 | O what spirituall Calenture possesses you, to make this hard shift to destroy your selues? |
A20647 | Or any part thereof? |
A20647 | Or d ● d they goe about to aduance the right Heire in the Spanish ● nuasion? |
A20647 | Or for enriching him with a Patrimony, and Priuiledges almost equall to their owne? |
A20647 | Or for withdrawing him from the iawes of the Barbarous deuourers of Italy? |
A20647 | Or must they stay, to aske and obtaine leaue of their Clergie, to depose such a transgressor? |
A20647 | Or that he ouer whom the Emperour had supreame temporall authority, should haue authority ouer the Emperour in temporall causes? |
A20647 | So that of this place, that Archbishop of whom I spoke before, exclaimes, who can endure this? |
A20647 | Thus farre Feuardentius charges vs. 36 And is it not your case also, to for ● ait your Martyrdome vpon the same circumstances? |
A20647 | To such a one as will be content to resigne, when so euer the other will aske forgiuenesse? |
A20647 | To what King haue Churches or Altars beene erected? |
A20647 | Wee therefore repute OTHO Emperour; For, if the Electors would neuer agree, should the Apostolicke Sea alwayes be without a defender? |
A20647 | What King hath done any miracles? |
A20647 | What infallible assurance could they haue of this, to excuse them of disobedience in going, or indiscretion in swearing? |
A20647 | Who would wish S. Henrie the Dane any health, that had seene him, When wormes crawled out of a corrupted Vlcer in his Knee, put them in againe? |
A20647 | and haue these two Breues made your case to differ so much from his, that that which was lawfull to him, may not be so to you? |
A20647 | and may not the Pope as well Canonize the whole Spanish Fleete, which perished in 88. for your Catholique faith, and Ecclesiastique immunitie? |
A20647 | and that he refused to put on a paire of old bootes, because a worshipfull man had worne them? |
A20647 | and that when his handes did cleaue with colde, he would put on no gloues? |
A20647 | how durst hee say, that this kissing of the popes feete, was established in saint Luke, when the sinner kissed Christs feete? |
A20647 | or did those which vndertooke for you, euer intend this forsaking? |
A20647 | or doe they thinke that the will and commandements of God are deriued to vs onely by the way of the Pope? |
A20647 | or hath the blood of any men executed by those lawes, died your Martyrologes with any Rubriques? |
A20647 | or this, That it is better to sinne against God, then our spirituall Father, because he can reconcile vs to God, but no body to him? |
A20647 | or was the way of the right Heire Catholiquely prepared by Dolemans booke? |
A20647 | wil you so, in obeying him, disobey him,& swallow his conclusions,& yet accuse his fashiō of prouing them? |
A70779 | ''T is True, and you say well, Oaths only serve till Truth- speaking comes, and you say, it is come to you; But how shall we know that? |
A70779 | * This was Chrysostom''s Exhortation Now it s said, How can we Trade without an Oath? |
A70779 | A. Thou wilt say that also concerning thy Wife; How is it now Adultery, which was sometime suffered? |
A70779 | Again, Let none say to me, What if any lay on me a Necessity of Swearing? |
A70779 | And how doth he swear by himself? |
A70779 | And how should those Honest Men invent one? |
A70779 | And how then is it not Confusion, that a Christian must be instructed, that he must not swear? |
A70779 | And if it was of Evil, how was it commanded in the Law? |
A70779 | And of thy Right Eye; What if I have a Delight in it, and be inflamed with the Love of it,& c.? |
A70779 | And thou shalt Swear the Lord liveth in Truth and Righteousness, and Judgment,& c. And how doth the Gospel forbid us to Swear? |
A70779 | And what if he do not believe? |
A70779 | And what more effectual Remedy can any People propose against the notorious Abuse and evil Consequence of Swearing, then Truth- speaking? |
A70779 | And what was this, tell me now? |
A70779 | And what''s the Meaning of a Writing? |
A70779 | Answer me in Truth now: If I had sworn alwayes, and at every season, what Priviledge would my Principality have? |
A70779 | B. Wilt thou allow the same also to me? |
A70779 | But Paul also swore, as they say? |
A70779 | But he feeds daily Forswearers and great Swearers, and will he give thee up to Famish, because thou hearkenest to him? |
A70779 | But in the Laws which Men command thou darest alledge no such thing, as, What if this or that,& c? |
A70779 | But much rather, why should we be imposed upon? |
A70779 | But such Distrust ought not to reign in the Faithful: But if we trust not Words, what should an Oath do? |
A70779 | But this is not so, nor can any think so: For God sweareth by none; for how can he, seeing he is Lord and Maker of all things? |
A70779 | But thou sayest, We have heard that God himself sometimes swore: The holy Scriptures record that; But is there any thing better then God? |
A70779 | But thou wilt say perhaps, What shall I do; he neither doth nor will believe me, unless I Swear? |
A70779 | But what do I speak of these? |
A70779 | But what shall I say of Oaths of the Courts that are left? |
A70779 | But what wilt thou say to me of the old Covenant? |
A70779 | But what wouldst thou have? |
A70779 | Can it any way be changed? |
A70779 | Come, tell me for what Cause an Oath was introduced, and why it was allowed? |
A70779 | Darest not thou that art initiated touch the holy Table? |
A70779 | Do we therefore think we do not sin, because they are not punished? |
A70779 | Dost thou give to some as Infants a kind of first Food, that they may at length receive a succeeding kind of Meat? |
A70779 | Dost thou make that Law an Oath, which forbids to Swear? |
A70779 | Doth he fear God, or doth he not fear him? |
A70779 | For, if one would have a more Venerable Man, would not the Case have Disgrace in it? |
A70779 | For, tell me, Thou halest a man to an Oath; What dost thou seek? |
A70779 | HOUT, that exceeds all Iniquity and Audaciousness: What then is to be done? |
A70779 | Hast thou therefore received Letters and Badges that thou shouldst lose thy Soul? |
A70779 | Hath he forsworn? |
A70779 | He may swear, who can not repent of his Oath: And what did the Lord swear? |
A70779 | He that brings the Fire by which an House is burnt, is he a Stranger to the Burning? |
A70779 | He that makes no Conscience of that Law that forbids Lying, will he make any Conscience of Forswearing? |
A70779 | Hear, ye CLERGY- MEN, who bring the HOLY GOSPELS for men to swear upon; How can ye be secure from that Oath, who sow the Seed of Perjury? |
A70779 | How can they ever hope to look their Lord with Comfort in the Face, who so severely Treat their Fellow- Servants? |
A70779 | How just and severe a Censure is this out of an Heathen''s Mouth upon the Practice of Dissolute Christians? |
A70779 | How low is Man faln from the primitive Rule of Life? |
A70779 | IF TO SWEAR IS FOUND TO BE DEVILISH, how are they to be punished who Forswear? |
A70779 | IF TO SWEAR TRULY BE A CRIME, and a transgressing of the Commandment, where shall we place Perjury? |
A70779 | If an Oath be forbidden to men, and a man imitates God in not Swearing, how is it that God is related in the holy Scriptures to swear? |
A70779 | If he be not faithful in Word, how will God by any means be the Witness of an Oath for him, who is destitute of Faith, to which God hath Respect? |
A70779 | If it be a great Good, not to Swear at all; what is it to Impose an Oath? |
A70779 | If it was not lawful for all to Name God simply, how great Audaciousness is it to call it in Witness? |
A70779 | Is God absent by this Means? |
A70779 | Is Religion placed in a Leaf? |
A70779 | Is it because an Oath ministred unto Freemen is as it were the Rack& Torture tendered unto them? |
A70779 | Is it not that they speak like Men? |
A70779 | Is it that we abuse that simply, this not so? |
A70779 | Is that Impossible? |
A70779 | Lastly, If thou shalt impose on any a Necessity of Swearing in the holy House, how horrible an Oath dost thou enjoyn, if thou dost so? |
A70779 | Let us now discourse concerning the Jewish Law to day: What is that, will he say? |
A70779 | Make God, the Great God of Heaven and Earth our Caution in worldly Controversies, as if we would bind him to obtain our own Ends? |
A70779 | Moreover, Who gave Power to Popes, to break the Command of God? |
A70779 | No, said the Bishop; and why? |
A70779 | No, thou seest that it is not for this: What gainest thou then, tell me now? |
A70779 | Ought not one even to Dread when God is named? |
A70779 | Paul Hungerd; and do thou chuse rather to Hunger then to transgress any of God''s Commandments: Why art thou so Unbelieving? |
A70779 | Perjury is a Denying of God: What need of God in this Matter? |
A70779 | Say, So may I not be blind? |
A70779 | Shalt thou chuse to do and to suffer all things, that thou mayst not swear, and shall not he Reward thee? |
A70779 | Surely it doth not prohibit an Oath, but requires a true one? |
A70779 | Tell me now, How are Parrets known? |
A70779 | Tell me now, how great Madness is it? |
A70779 | Tell me, my Friend, What dost thou get by Swearing? |
A70779 | That Christ is a Priest forever: Is that Uncertain? |
A70779 | The Word Hypocrisie signifies thus much, that which being one thing appears another; How then falleth he into Hypocrisie that sweareth? |
A70779 | Then said the Bishop, Why wilt thou not swear before a Judge,& c? |
A70779 | Thou a Worm, Dust and Ashes, and a Vapour; darest thou snatch thy Lord, who art such an one for a Surety, and compellest to accept him? |
A70779 | Thou hast lost both thy self and him: But hath he not Forsworn? |
A70779 | Thou wilt say; How can it be, that the same is sometimes Good, sometimes not? |
A70779 | Upon the Brink of a Precipice, or far from it? |
A70779 | We would fain know, if a most August Act of God''s Worship be nighest the Pit''s Brink, or farthest from it? |
A70779 | What Evil is it then to hale men back again upon Penalties? |
A70779 | What Evil therefore hath Swearing? |
A70779 | What Fruit gets he that often sweareth? |
A70779 | What Oath dost thou leave to us? |
A70779 | What do I speak of a Fellow- Servant? |
A70779 | What doth it say then of OATHS there? |
A70779 | What if I use an Oath Unwillingly, but to free me from Danger? |
A70779 | What if an Oath be written, and not pronounced with the Voice? |
A70779 | What if she be Nice and Curious? |
A70779 | What if the Books of the holy Scriptures be not used? |
A70779 | What if we be drawn by Necessity to give an Oath? |
A70779 | What is this but to contradict the natural Tendency of the Command of Christ and his Apostles? |
A70779 | What is this less then, Swear not at all? |
A70779 | What more? |
A70779 | What serve they for then? |
A70779 | What shall we say then? |
A70779 | What so great thing hast thou gained, as that which thou hast lost? |
A70779 | What then is to be done, if any require an Oath, yea, compel to Swear? |
A70779 | What then shall we say is beyond Yea and Nay? |
A70779 | What then shall we say to these things? |
A70779 | What then, if I shall shew thee, that it is not this only? |
A70779 | What then? |
A70779 | What then? |
A70779 | What then? |
A70779 | Where, sayes he, wouldst thou chuse to walk? |
A70779 | Whether an Oath be an elicit Act of Religious Virtue? |
A70779 | Who ever spake more seriously then our Saviour? |
A70779 | Who more necessary things? |
A70779 | Who said so? |
A70779 | Whom therefore do you more believe, me that do not swear, or them that do swear? |
A70779 | Why didst thou not rather Dye? |
A70779 | Why doth the Law command, that they should swear by God? |
A70779 | Why must Neither by any other Oath be added after such a plain Prohibition, as, My Brethren, Above all things Swear not? |
A70779 | Why then shall this be said to be of Evil? |
A70779 | Why therefore do they record that he swore? |
A70779 | Why? |
A70779 | Will you learn why they allowed them of old to Swear, not to Forswear? |
A70779 | Wouldst thou also learn on the contrary, how those things are not fit for a Child, which are not for a Man? |
A70779 | Wouldst thou have him to Forswear? |
A70779 | ],[ London? |
A70779 | but being gone out, thou wouldst not touch the Head of thy Child; but touchest thou the Table, and doest not dread nor fear? |
A70779 | or rather because every Oath endeth with Detestation and Malediction of Perjury? |
A70779 | or who reaches a Sword, whereby a man is slain, is not he an Accessory to the Slaughter? |
A70779 | thus, But some will say, If any be forced to swear, what is to be done? |
A70779 | to Deceive? |
A70779 | — What then, if any require an Oath, and impose a Necessity of Swearing? |
A70779 | — Where is there any need of an Oath to him that so lives, as one that is attain''d to the height of Truth? |
A68730 | And how, if out of this foundation of Bellarmine it should follow, that the primitiue Church had not all necessarie power to attaine vnto her end? |
A68730 | And if he haue greater authority, whence I pray you should he haue it: from God or from men? |
A68730 | And is there any Catholike, who doth not commend their minds that are affected to that Sea, which is the foundation and strength of our faith? |
A68730 | And long before Gaguinus S. Bernard: f Doth not in these dates ambition, more then deuotion weare the thresholds of the Apostles? |
A68730 | And that which might truely be affirmed of one of them alone, to pronounce generally and indefinitly of them both? |
A68730 | And then what doth it helpe for the proofe of this proposition, to propound an example of a Tyrant, or the killing of a Tyrant? |
A68730 | And therefore if we may not sinne to gaine that to Christ, for what cause shal it be lawfull for vs to sinne? |
A68730 | And this is that which the Apostle writeth to the Corinthians: 3 What will you? |
A68730 | And why may not wee aswell vse an argument of the same kinde against this other opinion of the Diuines? |
A68730 | As al other things: Who doubteth, but that this is the more hainous offence which is punished more seuerely? |
A68730 | As though Matrimonie might be dissolued by the constitutions of the Pope? |
A68730 | But good God? |
A68730 | But let it be so: he vnderstood the cause, and iudged him worthy of censure, and therefore did excommunicate the Emperour; what then? |
A68730 | But this submission what is it to Ciuill iudgement and temporall iurisdiction? |
A68730 | But what if the Emperour will not draw his sword at the becke of the Priest? |
A68730 | But what is this to a Temporall kingdome? |
A68730 | But what of it? |
A68730 | Could not the Church thinke you chasten him without any harme at all to the people? |
A68730 | For although, they had been freed by our Sauiour his warrant, what I pray you, had this exemption auailed them to the sowing of the Gospell? |
A68730 | For otherwise what shall we say? |
A68730 | For to what end were priuiledges giuen to them, if by a common right they were not subiect to kings? |
A68730 | For what I pray you? |
A68730 | For what? |
A68730 | For where can this appeare? |
A68730 | For ● hat? |
A68730 | Gaudemus, extra de diuortijs? |
A68730 | Had this man thinke you any braine? |
A68730 | He hath mercie on whom he will haue mercie, and whom he will be hardneth Neither may any man say vnto him, d Why hast thou made me thus? |
A68730 | Hence it is, that the Prince takes himselfe to be wronged, while his Ministers are hindred in the execution of their offices? |
A68730 | I allow it: he was a Prophet also, it is true, and what then? |
A68730 | I can call in more, and that very many to testifie the truth of this matter, but what needs any more? |
A68730 | If false, wherefore? |
A68730 | If hee constrained him, by what power, by feare of what did hee constraine him? |
A68730 | If the Apostles had had power to dispose of the temporalties of Christians, Peter surely had not said, Did it not? |
A68730 | If therefore these powers be ioyned together, neither in dignities, offices, nor actions, let Bozius tell vs wherein they are ioyned? |
A68730 | Is it because it is at your pleasure to interprete the will of God, comprehended in the diuine Law, and in the Scriptures? |
A68730 | Is it so sure and certaine, that the Pope hath giuen him by the law of God more authority ouer Princes, then ouer priuate persons? |
A68730 | Must we beleeue the same of the Church, or of the Pope? |
A68730 | Now surely, there is altogether a fault amongst you, that you haue iudgements amongst you, why do you not rather suffer losse? |
A68730 | Or because he knew not the truth of the matter, and the doctrine of the Church? |
A68730 | Or did the Church all that time want learned and watchfull Pastors, and by that meanes either neglected or did not vnderstand her temporall interest? |
A68730 | Or if the Emperour were inferiour to God only, and the lesse could not depose the greater, how could the Christian subiects depose him? |
A68730 | Or in a word, that they were so fearefull, and narrow minded, that they durst not tell the Princes that which they knew? |
A68730 | Paul doth say, that all happened to the Iewes in figures? |
A68730 | That seruice, which the sire from heauen did, saith he, could not the earthly sword haue performed the same? |
A68730 | Then a few lines after, doth adde, that the same sword is to be vsed nutu sacerdotis: and addes not forsitan? |
A68730 | Thinke you so indeed? |
A68730 | To belieue such matters, good Lord, should I tearme it ignorance, or madnesse? |
A68730 | Was it fit to 〈 ◊ 〉 and confound together matters of so diuerse and differe it kinds? |
A68730 | Was it not more profitable for the Church that an heretike Emperour should not gouerne Catholikes? |
A68730 | Was not afterwards in the same Kingdome of France the change from the Carolouingi ● to the Capeuingii made with great iniustice? |
A68730 | What doth either the Apostle fight with himselfe, or doth Peter teach one thing and Paul another? |
A68730 | What if there bee no temporall state, which will or dare contest with this state which is enemie to the Ecclesiastike common- wealth? |
A68730 | What is the matter then? |
A68730 | What is this to a crowne and scepter of a temporall Maiestie? |
A68730 | What may we thinke? |
A68730 | What may wee thinke that those diuine Prelates taught the people, that there was no remedie against that Apostata, but in patience and teares? |
A68730 | What say the Aduersaries to this? |
A68730 | What say you to Ananias, what to the Corinthian, were they not cut off by the church? |
A68730 | What should I speake of Iulianus the successor of Constantius? |
A68730 | What should I vse many words? |
A68730 | What then? |
A68730 | What, did the heate of religion and the zeale of the house of God faile them? |
A68730 | Where then is his kingdome? |
A68730 | Which fault who can not plainely deprehend, in this former reasoning of Bellarmine? |
A68730 | Whilest it remained, did it not belong to thee, and being sould was it not in thy power? |
A68730 | Who would not laugh at such kind of Arguments so full of vanitie? |
A68730 | Why doe you forbidde vs to doe that which God commands vs to doe? |
A68730 | Why doe you inuade an others borders? |
A68730 | Why should we not in like manner, and with much more reason, hould the same iudgement of Kings? |
A68730 | Why then did the Church tolerate Ualens, Ualentinianus, Heraclitus, and others? |
A68730 | Why then might not Zacharie also serue his owne malice or loue, and after the manner of men in some part violate iustice? |
A68730 | Will any wise man iudge that this is lawfull for them to doe, by the example of Zacharias his Act? |
A68730 | and after it was sould, was it not in thine owne power? |
A68730 | and both to compose them themselues, and to exhort others rather to martyrdome, than to armes and insurrections, to which we are prone by nature? |
A68730 | and of Pius Quintus against Elizabeth, Kings of England? |
A68730 | and the Emperour, who was a man that affected glory so much, did he acknowledge the temporall power of that Pope ouer him? |
A68730 | being complete armed, and playing the souldier rather then the Pope? |
A68730 | both Kings of France? |
A68730 | by what meanes then will she reuenge herselfe? |
A68730 | doth S. Bernard in this case giue to the Priest any temporall power ouer the Emperour? |
A68730 | doth he not know, that that spirituall incision, which is proper to the Church, begā euen with the Church her self? |
A68730 | is it any more, then that by the patterne of that action, the Pope may now doe, as then Zacharie did? |
A68730 | is not this one place enough to stop all mens mouthes? |
A68730 | nay what if he shall draw it against the Priests beck and assent? |
A68730 | or Philip the Faire by Albert of Austria? |
A68730 | or could not an earthly sword haue executed the same office, which the fire from heauen did performe? |
A68730 | or doth declare that the Laickes are not competent Iudges for the Clergie? |
A68730 | or if he should say it, were he able to make it good by any reason or authority? |
A68730 | or that which God directly forbids to be done, the same may lawfully be commanded by it? |
A68730 | or what coherence and connexion of these two Propositions can there be? |
A68730 | or with what authoritie can they perswade the same vnto vs? |
A68730 | shall I come to you with a rod or in loue and in the spirit of meekenesse? |
A68730 | that he might flatter the Emperour? |
A68730 | that it should bee thought that he might bee by Boniface depriued of the right of his crowne, and an other to bee substituted in his place? |
A68730 | vpon Philip the Faire, how little it profited, nay how much it hurt the Church? |
A68730 | was this conference betweene the Pope and the Emperour, of wordes, and not of things: of the name, and not of the right and power? |
A68730 | were not the rotten members of the Church wo nt to be cut off euen from her infancie& first beginning? |
A68730 | what should he doe with the Name, if another carie away his Right and Power? |
A68730 | where is his Temporall dominion? |
A68730 | whether is that gentle and humble confession banished out of our world? |
A68730 | which is, that hee may giue his consent to a people for the like causes& respects to put down their king? |
A68730 | why reach you your sithe into another mans haruest? |
A09103 | & i ● the Pope thus bynding them( look to himself) an oultrec ● i ● dance of tyrany? |
A09103 | 145. whether they can make new articles of faith or no? |
A09103 | 50. Who lay the scandall of Balaam, Catholicks or Protestants? |
A09103 | ABOVT RECOVRSE MADE to the Bishop of Rome for decision, whether the Oath might lawfully be taken by English Catholiks, or no? |
A09103 | ABOVT THE DEATH OF HENRY the third King of France: whether it may be an example of the Popes allowance of such murt ● ers? |
A09103 | AND Whether the said Pope hath Power to make new Articles of faith? |
A09103 | About recourse made to the Bishop of Rome for decisiō, whether the Oath might lawfully be taken by English Catholicks, or no? |
A09103 | About the death of Henry the third King of France: whether it may be an example of allowance of such murthers? |
A09103 | Againe, that he saith an Vnity that is proper to Christ hims ● l ●? |
A09103 | Againe, where will he find in all Bellarmyne that solamisericordia, only mercy, is the entire obiect of our confidence? |
A09103 | All which if we suppose( and who, against the authority of such manner of witnesses, can make any doubt or exception?) |
A09103 | And are all these thinges only Ceremoniall without substance, or essence of religion? |
A09103 | And are not other Catholikes deliuered from the guylt therof by the long and diligent search of iustice made thereabout? |
A09103 | And are not these distinctions needfull in this affaire? |
A09103 | And are not these goodly definitions( thinke you) for so great and graue a man to produce? |
A09103 | And are not these words playne, that the whole action of Ioseph his selling into Egypt was by Gods permissiue prouidence? |
A09103 | And are these particulers, or any one of thē which you haue so much vrged, for this purpose, to be verified of Innocentius? |
A09103 | And are these poyntes also not substantiall, nor any wayes touching religion, but Ceremonies? |
A09103 | And are these sleight pretenses Syr VVilliam? |
A09103 | And besides this wil M. Barlow haue no respect to the cases and genders in Latin? |
A09103 | And can any thing be spoken more cleerly for vs, and for our cause, then this? |
A09103 | And can there be any thing more contradictory then this? |
A09103 | And can there be any thing more contumeliously and Lucian- like spoken then this? |
A09103 | And could M. Barlow choose but see this when he wrote his Reply? |
A09103 | And did it not happen to our Sauiour hims ● l ● e, and S. Paul, and other great Seruants of God? |
A09103 | And did not I tell you, that you should haue mysteries? |
A09103 | And did not they cyte many places of Scriptures, to proue the equity& necessity therof? |
A09103 | And did not this deserue, that M. Barlow should haue brought forth authenticall testimony to the contrary? |
A09103 | And did this man I pray you send these letters and Frederickes picture to the Soldan? |
A09103 | And do not all Protestants the like at this day, in all places where they are, both in Polonia, Austria, Bohemia, Styria, and els where? |
A09103 | And do we not see what prophane trifling this is? |
A09103 | And do you grant thus much Syr? |
A09103 | And do you heare this doctrine, or do you belieue that he saith truth therin? |
A09103 | And do you not thinke, that this Gētlemā can speak Frēch? |
A09103 | And do you see his vanytie? |
A09103 | And do you see now heer ●, how zealous M. Barlow is become vpon the suddayne for defence of consecrated vessels in the Church? |
A09103 | And do you see, how he seeketh a hole to runne out at? |
A09103 | And doe you not see what gnibling this is? |
A09103 | And doe you not think ● he hath played well his prize? |
A09103 | And doth he not seeme to speake well for his fee? |
A09103 | And doth not M. Barlow trim vp Authors well that passe through his hands to make them serue his purpose? |
A09103 | And doth not that doctour conde ● ● e all the articles the ● in? |
A09103 | And doth not the very life,& soule of the Church depend of these two things, a true Ministry, and lawful Head? |
A09103 | And doth not thē M. Barlow for his writing deserue a good reward of a siluer ● hetstone? |
A09103 | And doth not this man deserue to be credited, speaking in his owne behalfe before Pope, all writers, and whatsoeuer other testimony? |
A09103 | And doth not this reason cleare as well Blondus as Petrus de Vineis? |
A09103 | And doth not your Reader see, to what straites of absurdityes, your folly hath brought you? |
A09103 | And doth this Ceremony of discipline please M. Barlow, Or doth his Church admit the same? |
A09103 | And finally those last words, that they would not indure it, written in great letters, where doth he find them? |
A09103 | And hath the Chāpion M. Barlow any thing to reply for his Lord in this? |
A09103 | And haue you euer heard such a dreame, or deliration in one that professeth wit? |
A09103 | And how could I then by those two letters of T. M. meane Tua, or Tanta Maiestas? |
A09103 | And how could he conceiue then, that Medina should meane, that this sheep must haue time to cōsult, whether shee must fly, or no? |
A09103 | And how then are these, and such other places brought in for witnesse, as though they had somewhat to say against vs? |
A09103 | And how then can M. Barlow say, that the Apologer said no such thing? |
A09103 | And how then can this be called fraudlent impudēcy? |
A09103 | And how then doth he relate the procurers of the poyson doubtfully, and the instrument certainely? |
A09103 | And how then is Iordanis conuersus retr ● rs ● m, with this Minister? |
A09103 | And how then was the error espied and amended? |
A09103 | And how will M. Barlow now defend this position, that they were not like in specie nor in indi ● iduo? |
A09103 | And i ● this Sy ● so bad an argument? |
A09103 | And if he find them not, who gaue him leaue to add them, and crowne his owne inuention with Capitall letters? |
A09103 | And if no error, wherin was the amendment? |
A09103 | And if not, what sufficient proofes,& notable expressing of her griefes doth this Minister meane? |
A09103 | And if they be different, how can they then be reciprocal in signification& translation? |
A09103 | And if they could not hope it, how could they pray for it, but only in iest? |
A09103 | And in this case I would demand of M. Barlow, what ground he hath to scoffe so at these three miracles here set down as he doth? |
A09103 | And is it so Syr? |
A09103 | And is it so? |
A09103 | And is not passion a great infirmity, that driueth a man to these absurdities? |
A09103 | And is not this Minister well perswaded of himselfe, and his owne learning, that thus craketh? |
A09103 | And is not this S ● r a good freing? |
A09103 | And is not this a good reason, say I? |
A09103 | And is not this a very learned Axiome? |
A09103 | And is not this a very sheepish apprehension indeed? |
A09103 | And is not this a worthy dispute? |
A09103 | And is not this good dealing, when ther ● are so many authors o ● credit in print, to a ● ● ow this s ● orie? |
A09103 | And is not this good stuffe? |
A09103 | And is not this humor of malicious contradicting verie fit for the Diuell indeed, who therof hath his name of Sathan? |
A09103 | And is not this man more fit to be set agayne to Inspeach, and Grammar rules, then to be imployed in writing for defence of his Maiesty? |
A09103 | And is not this per ● idious treachery in M. Barlow to make him his chiefest pillar, who hath not one word o ● the matter in controuersy? |
A09103 | And is not this plaine inough? |
A09103 | And is not this thinke you, fit for a Prince to read, or pre ● ēded Prelate to write? |
A09103 | And is not this very confidently spoken trow yow? |
A09103 | And is not this well proued, thinke yow? |
A09103 | And is the infamation of enemies sufficient with you, M. Barlow, to condemne a man? |
A09103 | And is there no substantiall point neyther in all this, but only matter of Ceremony? |
A09103 | And is thi ● conformable to the practice& doctrine of M. Barlows Church? |
A09103 | And is this conforme to the present Church of England? |
A09103 | And is this reuelatiō trow you so vncertain? |
A09103 | And may not this happen to the holiest man that is? |
A09103 | And now M. Barlow, is this a calme perswasiō? |
A09103 | And now how do you thinke that M. Barlow will shift of this important point appert ● ● ning to conscience in Religion? |
A09103 | And now what do you think, that M. Barlow out of his ingeniosity will find to bring for maintenance, that this was a true contradiction in Bellarmine? |
A09103 | And the same S. Hierom talking to an Heretick, saith: Cur post quadringentos annos d ● cere ● os ● iteris, quod ante nesciuimus? |
A09103 | And the word of God was made vnto Elias, saying, hast thou not seene Achab humilia ● ed before me? |
A09103 | And was not this a vertuous man trow you; who to pleasure the Turkes, sworn enemies of Christ, would thus deale with Christians? |
A09103 | And was not this rather charity, then hypocrisy? |
A09103 | And was the Religion thereof the Protestant religion, or ours? |
A09103 | And was there euer sentence so interpreted as this? |
A09103 | And what Catholicke Religion, for defence wherof those Catholicke Princes in S. Augustines dayes did make those lawes so commended by him? |
A09103 | And what can be required more to the vnity of names? |
A09103 | And what contradiction is there heere; A man may place some con ● idence, but the sure ● t way is to place none? |
A09103 | And what did the Pope more in this case thē this? |
A09103 | And what doth he alleage against these foure waie ●? |
A09103 | And what is his reason trow you? |
A09103 | And what is that? |
A09103 | And what is this against me? |
A09103 | And what maketh this against vs, or for the Protestants? |
A09103 | And what maketh this to the purpose? |
A09103 | And what more orderly proceeding could there be then this, in an act of such quality? |
A09103 | And what now hath M. Barlow to say to this? |
A09103 | And what reply is now made( thinke you) to all this? |
A09103 | And what right hand of theirs is the right hand of iniquity? |
A09103 | And what shall we say now to this? |
A09103 | And what then will yow say to such forgery& falsity? |
A09103 | And what wil M. Barlow say to this? |
A09103 | And what will M. Barlow say to this point of discipline? |
A09103 | And what will M. Barlow say to this? |
A09103 | And what will the Apologer say heere? |
A09103 | And what will the discreet reader hould M. Barlow for his sex? |
A09103 | And what will you say to such malicious follie, or foolish malice? |
A09103 | And when you say, If I be a true man, this is so, you may be thought to doubt, whether your selfe be a true man or no? |
A09103 | And wher in thē? |
A09103 | And where the ● is the contradiction? |
A09103 | And whether iesting with God in prayer be lawfull by M. Barlowes Theologie, I would also gladly know? |
A09103 | And whether the sayd Pope hath power to make new Articles of faith? |
A09103 | And whither would Isay haue sent him, but to the Gouernours thereof? |
A09103 | And who could vse more myld and moderate words to expresse the dutifull mindes of Catholiks, towards his Maiesty, then he doth in these? |
A09103 | And who then that shall read these wordes will not thinke them all to be the wordes of F. Persons? |
A09103 | And who will not laugh at these two profundityes of M. Barlowes diuinity, neither of them being iustifyable in the eyes of any man of meane capacity? |
A09103 | And why doth M. Doctour Reynolds by M. Barlowes owne, ● ● ● ● i ● ony, giue the Title not of Head ● but of Supreme Gouernour? |
A09103 | And why good Sir? |
A09103 | And why had not this bene answered? |
A09103 | And why had not you done this also, if your mind had not 〈 ◊ 〉 impious? |
A09103 | And why is Iordani ● now turned backward, saith the letter ● Why is this Ministers voice contrary to the voice& sens ● of all other Protestants? |
A09103 | And why now had not M. Barlow recited the whole sentence, as it lay in Binniu ●? |
A09103 | And why then did M. Barlow cut them of? |
A09103 | And why then doe you beginne with so notorious vntruthes? |
A09103 | And why was that? |
A09103 | And why, good M. Barlow? |
A09103 | And why? |
A09103 | And why? |
A09103 | And wil M. Barlow allow of this recourse? |
A09103 | And will M. Barlow deny thi ●? |
A09103 | And will M. Barlow make this an example of spirituall obedience to temporall Princes, that was thus extorted? |
A09103 | And will M. Barlows Church admit this doctrine of Masses and celebrating the Martyn feastes? |
A09103 | And will any man belieue this, that he will be so stout? |
A09103 | And will here M. Barlow againe cry out of Pro ● ● nda Sathanae, and of the hornes of Sedecias? |
A09103 | And will not the Catholicks of England vse this speac ● also vnto their King? |
A09103 | And would any learned man fal into such absurdyties, and so shew his ignorance both in things& times? |
A09103 | And would his Maiesty haue admitted the messenger, or message? |
A09103 | And yet in another place he canua ● eth thē againe with the same Prescription, saying: Qui estis vos? |
A09103 | Are not his mortifications knowne? |
A09103 | Are not these good inferences? |
A09103 | Are not these playne contradictions? |
A09103 | Are not these pretty fooleries M. Barlow? |
A09103 | Are our Priests in England, or on this side the seas, more incumbred with ignorance then the Ministers? |
A09103 | Are these the poyntes wherein Cardinall Bellarmine made his comparison, or noe? |
A09103 | Are they not all gates of Hell? |
A09103 | Are they not executed, that were culpable therof? |
A09103 | Are they not perspicuous? |
A09103 | Are they not still in the same degree of difference and oppositiō as before? |
A09103 | Are you so mutable within the compasse of two pages? |
A09103 | Augustine speaking of I ● dian, saith thus: Iulian was an vnbelieuing Emperour, was he not an Apostata? |
A09103 | Be wise ô ye Kings, and serue the Lord in feare: if not, w ● at ● the danger? |
A09103 | Besides this, the sayd Latin translation leaueth out the word tertius, and nameth only Alexander: will you assigne this also to the Printer? |
A09103 | But I may better retort this interrogation vpon M. Barlow, and aske him; But first, who taught him to ly so loud? |
A09103 | But I pray you Syr, whom we call vsually V ● spergensis, is not this name Conradus of Lichtenaw? |
A09103 | But I would aske M. Barlow, how he commeth to know this secret? |
A09103 | But I would aske him wherin? |
A09103 | But I would demaund of M. Barlow, what was the question betweene vs? |
A09103 | But alas is there no end of exprobration against the Innocent, for the nocent? |
A09103 | But did the Pope( saith he) write these bookes in defence of himself, to consute Petrus de Vineis? |
A09103 | But do you thinke that he wil stand to this now? |
A09103 | But first who girt the sword to the Popes side? |
A09103 | But good Syr, are you not ashamed to trifle in this manner, and to be taken euery foote in false consequences? |
A09103 | But good Syr, is your nature such, or lack of grace so great, that you can speake nothing without manifest falshood? |
A09103 | But hath he any more to say, thinke you, against the first question? |
A09103 | But here I would aske M. Barlow, why he leaueth out going to Church, which was the first part of the condition, and nameth only whore- domes? |
A09103 | But how doth be proue by this, that I confesse the Breue to forbid temporall Obedience? |
A09103 | But how doth he proue it? |
A09103 | But how doth this inference of yours hould? |
A09103 | But how is this proued? |
A09103 | But if without effect,& that he could not conclude; who should giue iudgment of the matter? |
A09103 | But to what end is all this? |
A09103 | But was Queene Elizabeth abused therein? |
A09103 | But was there euer such a Philosopher? |
A09103 | But what Church was that? |
A09103 | But what Sophistry, Syr, do you find in these wordes of mine now recited ● Are they not playne? |
A09103 | But what Syr, to distinguish or vse distinctions in a matter that may haue diuers senses or intendmēts? |
A09103 | But what dost thou say King Dauid? |
A09103 | But what dot ● he meane by peremptory inforcement? |
A09103 | But what doth he answere to the substance of the matter? |
A09103 | But what doth this proue? |
A09103 | But what helpeth this M. Barlowes cause? |
A09103 | But what iarre is this? |
A09103 | But what if all this were true, as it is not? |
A09103 | But what if here also vpon examination we find M. Barlow a lier? |
A09103 | But what inference doth he make of this thinke you? |
A09103 | But what is the question in controuersy? |
A09103 | But what is this to our purpos ●, that do talke of the spirituall Head of the Church? |
A09103 | But what is this to our purpose, who do seeke which of the Otho''s did slay Philip? |
A09103 | But what is this to the example of S. Pauls conflict betweene sense and reason, flesh and spirit, alleaged by M. Barlow? |
A09103 | But what is this vnto our Oath? |
A09103 | But what maketh this to the purpose we haue in hand? |
A09103 | But what more? |
A09103 | But what one author can he alleadg of any credit, that saith the same? |
A09103 | But what proueth this very Author against the Pope in this matter? |
A09103 | But what reason is there that I should belieue more this Author against the Pope, then the Pope against him? |
A09103 | But what say you now in this your last Reply after mature deliberation? |
A09103 | But what sayth M. Barlow to this? |
A09103 | But what sayth he, if there be a false assumption, and an vntrue applycation by the conscience, is it then erroneous, and not binding? |
A09103 | But what sense or construction, thinke you doth M. Barlow make of these words? |
A09103 | But what? |
A09103 | But what? |
A09103 | But where can he find that Azorius saith this? |
A09103 | But wherof M. Barlow? |
A09103 | But wherto now doth all this Preface pertaine, of Princes iealousies? |
A09103 | But who denieth this? |
A09103 | But who doth not see the folly of these arguments, which can moue nothing but laughter, or stomacke? |
A09103 | But who maketh that Church? |
A09103 | But who seeth not the malicious ● ● cophancy o ● this consequence? |
A09103 | But who shall determine or define the Controuersy? |
A09103 | But whoseeth not heere that neither the antecedent nor consequent haue any force? |
A09103 | But why do we stand spending of time in these tri ● ● ing obiections brought in by M. Barlow against himselfe? |
A09103 | But why doth he name one only, and he dead? |
A09103 | But why then was it changed? |
A09103 | But why, doth he shew himself so enraged? |
A09103 | But will you see this our doughty Doctour ouerthrown& confoūded both in him selfe, and by himselfe? |
A09103 | But yet what followes h ● erof, therfore the Pope stirred not vp the Sonne against the Father? |
A09103 | But ● herin standeth the agrieuance? |
A09103 | But, why did he not giue me 〈 ◊ 〉 a speedy answere, without tryfling, and so dispatch both me, and himselfe quickly? |
A09103 | Can M. Barlow say any thing iustly against this, if he will not calumniate? |
A09103 | Can any thing be spoken more plainly? |
A09103 | Can not these two stand togeather? |
A09103 | Can this be denyed with any shew of shamefastnes? |
A09103 | Can we gather grapes of thrones, or figgs of thistles? |
A09103 | Catholickes or Protestants? |
A09103 | Chapter he demandeth, why thē had not the Apostoles depriued Nero and Domitius of their Empires? |
A09103 | Chapter, he demandeth further, why the Apostles,& first Christians had not elected some new King Christan for the good of the Church at the beginning? |
A09103 | Chapters togeather:& in the end what leaue obtayned they, but against his will, when he durst no longer deny them? |
A09103 | Could the Printer also change the letter in the text? |
A09103 | Could they hope for this, seeing her now an old woman, and weakened also by many diseases? |
A09103 | Could this power come aswell from a Feminine, as a Masculine Mon ● rch? |
A09103 | Dare he stand to this triall out of S. Augustines workes themselues? |
A09103 | De quo caelo cecidit? |
A09103 | De quo mari emersit? |
A09103 | Dic de qua terra germinauit? |
A09103 | Did S Ambrose by this acknowledge that the Emperour had higher Authority, then he, in Church- matters? |
A09103 | Did euer any affirme, that this confidence of our merits did depend on them, as vpon the obiect of the same? |
A09103 | Did not diuers Councells set forth Credes with sundry explanations that were not before? |
A09103 | Did not he meane diuine fayth, or Theologicall beliefe? |
A09103 | Did not we graunt also, that Kings within their Kingdomes, may cause Prouinciall Councels to be made by their Bishops, Archbishops,& Metropolitans? |
A09103 | Did she make so notable a demonstration of her owne griefes which she had therof? |
A09103 | Did she put any man to death, any of the doers or counsellours therof? |
A09103 | Did she shed teares? |
A09103 | Did she vest her selfe with s ● ckloth for the same? |
A09103 | Did you not promise vs surer argumentes, then presumptions? |
A09103 | Do not these words affirme plainly, that Otho the Emperour, and not Otho the Count slew Philip? |
A09103 | Do not you see that this is playne cauelling indeed, and not disputing? |
A09103 | Do the Protestants agree to this interpretation? |
A09103 | Do they not cleare the doubt in controuersy? |
A09103 | Do they not disclay me from the English Hierarchie? |
A09103 | Do they not remoue confusion? |
A09103 | Do they passe( perhaps) Gods power to doe them? |
A09103 | Do you not see how intricate this matter is,& hard to resolue? |
A09103 | Do you see M. Barlow, wherein the comparison is made? |
A09103 | Do you see heere M. Barlows manner of writing? |
A09103 | Do you see how earne ● t the man is? |
A09103 | Do you see what a question he maketh, and how farre from the purpose? |
A09103 | Do you see, how hard a matter this is to bring a supposall into a conclusion? |
A09103 | Doe not his friends take pitty of his folly? |
A09103 | Doe not you thinke that he hath spoken well,& much to the purpose? |
A09103 | Doe they not still deny our Sauiours descent into hell? |
A09103 | Doe you not behould the poore man in what straites he is, to say somewhat? |
A09103 | Doe you note how many defects of truth are discouered in so smal an allegation? |
A09103 | Doe you see how the man speaketh in mysteries? |
A09103 | Doth Cuspinian say, that Manfred poysoned him? |
A09103 | Doth M. Barlow speake like an intellig ● nt man? |
A09103 | Doth he allow of these iealousies as proceeding from sanctity? |
A09103 | Doth he commend that fact of Salomon for making away his brother Adoniah, for asking only Abishag to be his wife? |
A09103 | Doth he euer say ● that his Maiesty offered ABVSE? |
A09103 | Doth he interpret it to signifie any particuler vertue? |
A09103 | Doth he no ● say, that some confidence may be reposed in our workes, so we be sure they be me ● itorious, and that we auoid pride? |
A09103 | Doth here the Prophet speake of factes, think yow, or else of fai ● h? |
A09103 | Doth not common sense teach it to be so? |
A09103 | Doth not crucifying imply as much as self whipping? |
A09103 | Doth not euery man see the itching humour of adulation, discouered here vpon any least occasion? |
A09103 | Doth not here malyce, and folly striue which of them shall haue the vpper hand in M. Barlow? |
A09103 | Doth not this man stoope low for help thinke you? |
A09103 | Doth not this proue that a selfe- chastizing of a mans bodie is pleasing to God? |
A09103 | Doth this Pre ● ate thinke there is a God? |
A09103 | Doth this import voluntary or inuoluntary whipping? |
A09103 | Durst any man in her dayes ● ut to death a kitchin boy of her house, much lesse of her bloud, without her knowledge, approbation, and consent? |
A09103 | First this: As for the Catholike Religion( sayth he) can there be one word found in all this Oath, tending to matter of Religion? |
A09103 | For I would aske, what fayth or beliefe, diuine or humane, Christian or naturall ● did the Apologer meane in his demaund? |
A09103 | For approbation of matters concerning faith? |
A09103 | For did not Bloudu ● write as an historiā,& not as a seruant? |
A09103 | For first where, or when can he shew, that we stick not at the substance of the Oath, but only at ● he forme? |
A09103 | For how many falshoodes, ignorances, and forgeryes haue bene shewed to be in this one dispute of his? |
A09103 | For how shall the Reader try the truth o ● this obiection? |
A09103 | For if that had bene omitted, then why had not M. Barlow now supplyed that defect, with aleadging or quoting some Author, that testifieth the same? |
A09103 | For if you should demand of the Catholicke, for example, why he belieueth the Reall Presence; he would answere you, because it is reuealed by God? |
A09103 | For is any thing strange in Gods prouidence( saith he) which seeth things to come, as if they were present and existent? |
A09103 | For obserue those words, al obedience that he oweth to his Maiestie, what is that? |
A09103 | For that he did not tell them distinctly which of the clauses contayned Arianis ● ●? |
A09103 | For that this perhaps, is called the Oath of Allegiance? |
A09103 | For what hath the malefactour for crime, or hereticke for schisme to doe in this affaire? |
A09103 | For what haue hornes to do with distinctions? |
A09103 | For what is there here to signify the Church, to signify heretikes, to signify this in- bred right? |
A09103 | For what is truth or propriety, that ● assiers vncertainty? |
A09103 | For what now I pray you is become of all this sharpe charge, and virulent accu ● ation of Pope Alexander? |
A09103 | For what puny- Sophister is there in Oxford, or Cambridge, who knoweth not that, species producatur de pluribus differentibus numero? |
A09103 | For where I demand, And needeth there no more, Syr, for proofe but this? |
A09103 | For where I pray you, as Blondus forced to this confession? |
A09103 | For who I pray you made him? |
A09103 | For who but God can reueale to a man what shall be his end, eyther for blisse or woe? |
A09103 | For who can be said to hope for that which he is certayn to haue? |
A09103 | For who euer wrote this before? |
A09103 | For who knoweth not, that Iesuites and Dominicans are two different Religious Orders? |
A09103 | For who saith, that a man doubteth of his iustice or righteousnes? |
A09103 | For who will say that the Popes Breue prohibits swearing against an vsurping deposer? |
A09103 | For why could he not here haue set downe the words of his Author? |
A09103 | For why, or how doth this doctour deny heere the other two articles of true Catholick doctrine? |
A09103 | From what heauen is he fallen? |
A09103 | Furthermore, if it be impossible for any Catholicke to beare true allegiance in his hart, what is his Maiestie like to gaine by vrging them to sweare? |
A09103 | Had it not bene inough for him to say, I will remember thy righteousnes? |
A09103 | Had it not bene more plaine dealing to haue alleaged some one sentence, or conclusion contradictory to the other? |
A09103 | Hath he a generall licence, to take away or adde what he listeth to his Authors words? |
A09103 | Hath he any testimonies of authors that auow the contrary, and affirme that they were not true? |
A09103 | Hath he euer seene any sheep in this deliberation? |
A09103 | Haue they no conscience? |
A09103 | He answereth; Can an oath be kept which was not first taken? |
A09103 | He denyeth him to be borne in Greece? |
A09103 | He denyeth him to be of an exellent wit? |
A09103 | His contempt of the world seene by his life, and conuersation? |
A09103 | Hovv art thou made an harlot, thou faithfull Citty, that wert once full of iudgement, and iustice dwelled therin, but now murtherers? |
A09103 | How can this iarre be excused by you? |
A09103 | How could I forbear ●, or who can blame me? |
A09103 | How did he find it? |
A09103 | How doth he reply? |
A09103 | How is his voyce contrary to the voyce& sense of all the rest? |
A09103 | How many fifty yeares are passed since that cradle was rockt? |
A09103 | How many scholle ● s and disciples were he like to haue th ● rin? |
A09103 | How many, and how grosse lyes haue bene detected? |
A09103 | How proueth he this? |
A09103 | How say you to the plots of France, Flanders, and Scotland, and other parts, do they conuince, that no Protesta ● t can be trusty? |
A09103 | How then doe I beg the question, when I do euince it by proofe? |
A09103 | How then doth the Apologer so grossely forget, and contradict himselfe, euen then, when he goeth about to proue contradictions in his Aduersary? |
A09103 | How then may these thinges violently induce any man to beleiue, that Po ● e Innocentius did conspire the poysoning of Fredericke? |
A09103 | How would they exaggerate such an aduantage? |
A09103 | I will demaund( saith he) of this Iesuit: first, whether ● his be not a Paganish delusion of God and men? |
A09103 | If all Authors stād for you, why do you corrupt their words, peruert their meaning? |
A09103 | If the controuersy y ● ● handle belong to fayth, or good life, what needeth so fraudulēt, so faithles,& persidious dealing? |
A09103 | If the true Church did perish, from whence is Donatus come vnto vs? |
A09103 | If they may not, wh ● re then is their c ● nfid ● nce? |
A09103 | If they may, why doth he ● al it incertitudinē iustitiae nostrae, the vncertainty of o ● ● righteousnes? |
A09103 | In what law of modesty doth this lye, to affirme such things? |
A09103 | In which case S. Augustine writing against the Donatists, saith thus: Si peri ● t Ecclesia, vnde ergo Donatus apparuit? |
A09103 | Is euery thing that is re ● used, refused freely without coaction? |
A09103 | Is he f ● t to haue care of soules, that seemeth to haue no soule himselfe, or care what becommeth of other mens soules? |
A09103 | Is he fit to be a Kings Chāpion in writing? |
A09103 | Is he so wary of not putting Kings and Princes in feare& iealousie of their thrones as you call them? |
A09103 | Is here now any contradiction? |
A09103 | Is it lawfull for euery man to deuise, add, alter, cut of, or disguise what he wil without controlment? |
A09103 | Is it not a shame to roue so farre from the marke, and to falsify the plaine meaning of Authors, and writers in this sort? |
A09103 | Is it not absurd, and ridiculous to call this skill of Logicke? |
A09103 | Is it not to shew that Innocentius the 4. hired one to poyson Fredericke? |
A09103 | Is it not whether the swearer doth make promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of religion, in taking the Oath? |
A09103 | Is it perhaps, for that they are strange, and not according to mans reason or vse of things that fall out ordinarily in the world? |
A09103 | Is it saep ● fallax, sēper inc ● rta? |
A09103 | Is it so Syr? |
A09103 | Is not his hate of ambition, honour, and wealth discouered by his voluntary pouerty? |
A09103 | Is not the forswearing of any one poynt of Catholike Religion sufficient to stay the cōscience of a Catholike man from swearing? |
A09103 | Is not then the false Prelate worthie for euer to be discredited? |
A09103 | Is not this Christian and charitable proceeding? |
A09103 | Is not this felicity? |
A09103 | Is not this fine? |
A09103 | Is not this plaine inough? |
A09103 | Is not this playne inough? |
A09103 | Is not this very confidētly spoken thinke you? |
A09103 | Is nothing promised in those words to be belieued, or not belieued? |
A09103 | Is the exacting of the Oath( saith he) a scandall actiue in our Magistrates? |
A09103 | Is the exacting of this Oath a scandall actiue in our Magistrates? |
A09103 | Is the vse of this Canon more amongst Catholikes or Protestants? |
A09103 | Is there any least similitude of these things against the Catholicks of England? |
A09103 | Is there any sense in this? |
A09103 | Is there any shame in these men? |
A09103 | Is there no difference? |
A09103 | Is there no law of truth or sincerity? |
A09103 | Is there not a wise man among you? |
A09103 | Is this a sufficient proofe that Pagan phrases concerning matters of religion may be vsed also in our Diuinity? |
A09103 | Is this dealing Episcopall, or not rather Diabolicall by such lying and forged fictions to do so open iniury to others? |
A09103 | Is this our owne Syr? |
A09103 | Is this plaine dealing? |
A09103 | Is this the liberty of Ghospellers? |
A09103 | Is this the profund ● tie of Sathan? |
A09103 | Iulian changed his religion, but our King not? |
A09103 | Let it be counted felicity, but it is left- handed felicity: what is left- handed felicity? |
A09103 | M ● Barlow demaundeth of me, in what sense I take the word Catholike, when I suppose the Roman Church to be the Catholicke Church? |
A09103 | May not any man proue Quidlibet ex Quolibet by this your manner of reasoning, in which you say what you li ● t, and proue nothing at all? |
A09103 | May not then, saith he, a Prince iudge in cases of Religion and Faith? |
A09103 | Might not Beares as soone be brought to the stake, as these men againe to their Monasteries to do penance? |
A09103 | Moreouer I would demaund, if she once perished how could she be raised to life againe? |
A09103 | N ● mq ● ● ● 〈 ◊ 〉 omnes porta Inferi? |
A09103 | No Syr? |
A09103 | No commiseration? |
A09103 | No compassion? |
A09103 | No, but solius prorsus, it alone, altogeather I will remember: why so? |
A09103 | Now what bringeth Maister Barlow to ouerthrow this doctrine? |
A09103 | Now what reply thinke you maketh M. Barlow? |
A09103 | O ● whether th ● re be any clauses in it against Catholicke Religion? |
A09103 | Of wicked life, or of false doctrine? |
A09103 | Or can M. Barlow conceaue that they haue one name without all vnity? |
A09103 | Or did Petrus de Vineis write any history? |
A09103 | Or did he vnderstand it? |
A09103 | Or do the Puritans in denying and impugning this, impugne but a ceremony, and no poynt of Religion it selfe? |
A09103 | Or doth he not teach any such thing in this chapter? |
A09103 | Or doth his Holines seeke fame by learning, or in secret, when he determineth any matter? |
A09103 | Or how will M. Barlow measure the same by inches or e ● ls, by feet or fathoms? |
A09103 | Or in what forme is this argument? |
A09103 | Or is his throne lesse or more weake thē theirs? |
A09103 | Or is the mentioning of Kings in generall a sufficient inference, that I meane of his Maiestie in particuler? |
A09103 | Or is your cause become now so desperate, as that the weaknes and wickednes therof, enforceth you to these hard shifts, and disgracefull attempts? |
A09103 | Or rather was i ● not more fraudulent in M. Barlow, not to tell his reader, that it was twice put downe, though once left out? |
A09103 | Or shall it be but likely only, and probable, that the old Testament is true, for that it was only supposed, and not proued at the beginning? |
A09103 | Or that he may not as well be condemned, for his too much slacknes, as for his ouer much ha ● t? |
A09103 | Or that if he had offered him an Oath repugnant to his Religion and conscience in those matters, he would haue obeyed; and acknowledged his authority? |
A09103 | Or was it perhaps for that the Doctour said that the whole Oath as it lay, was vnlaw ● ull? |
A09103 | Or was this Councel bound to submit it selfe, in these points of faith and religion, vnto that Emperour, as M. Barlows former doctrine inferreth? |
A09103 | Or was this Psalme well chosen by M. Barlow for his purpose of flattering Kinges and Princes, in respect of Gods warynes in his speaches? |
A09103 | Or were these Chayrs or Oracles so earnest before the Pope in his defence? |
A09103 | Or what Catholike will say that his refusall of swearing is against such a one, and not rather against the authority of his lawfull Pastour? |
A09103 | Or what kind of consecration do they vse therein? |
A09103 | Or when vpon the way an ho ● tler deuideth a p ● ● ke o ● oates to three ho ● ses, what skil of Logicke is required to that diuision? |
A09103 | Or where did you frame your cons ● ience? |
A09103 | Or whether there be any clauses in it against Catholicke Religion? |
A09103 | Or who giueth authority of iudgement to that Church, if the supreme Head and gouernour haue it not in himself? |
A09103 | Or who was euer accounted a Martyr in the Church of God, for refusing to deliuer vp ● Heathen Poet, or Philosophers booke? |
A09103 | Or why doth he so resolutely affirme that for certaine, which Vrspergensis, otherwise imprudēt inough, doth but only relate vpon heare- say? |
A09103 | Or why is this submission made? |
A09103 | Or will M. Barlowes profound diuinity teach vs, that in the selfe same mysterious actions, one part is subiect to Gods Prouidence, and the other not? |
A09103 | Or will he call them pro ● unda Sathanae, the profound mysteries of Sathan and iniquity? |
A09103 | Or would his Maiesty haue taken the same, in as good part, as Valentiniā did? |
A09103 | Our Colleges? |
A09103 | Our Seminaries? |
A09103 | Our Vniue ● sities for bringing vp, and instructing Priests? |
A09103 | Out of what groūd is he sprong? |
A09103 | Out of what sea hath he peept? |
A09103 | Out of which discourse, what trow yo ● doth M. Barlow infer? |
A09103 | Pope Innocentius actes, saith M. Barlow, could be no longer hid: descried they were& c. what were these acts I pray you? |
A09103 | Shall he be bound to read all Bellarmines fiue bookes, to see whether it be true or no? |
A09103 | Sit licèt: sed sinistra: quid est sinistra? |
A09103 | So he and who can deny ● but that here is also besmearing as M. Barlow hath framed his Cōmētary? |
A09103 | So that Peter we know, and Paul we know to be singular D ● uines; but who is this? |
A09103 | Speake in sooth, honest censurer( saith he) is vnity of names Hardings owne distinction in answere to Bishop Iewel ●? |
A09103 | Th ● se were my words, what cauill hath M. Barlow against them? |
A09103 | That if the illegitimation had bin in her bloud, no law could make it good? |
A09103 | That is, By the Sōnes procuremēt,( at whose hands but the Popes? |
A09103 | That it was commited before her knowledge? |
A09103 | The Bishops? |
A09103 | The Embassadours also of the King presently following, resisted him to his face before the Pope) that he sent Chaires or Oracles to Rome? |
A09103 | The Puritan Doctors? |
A09103 | The Sonne of such a Mother, as held her selfe much beholden to English Catholicks? |
A09103 | The holy Patri ● ● ches had good part therof, and shall we not call it felicity? |
A09103 | The other also that kneeleth and prayeth in the corners of streetes, whose conscience doth he iudge, or condemne? |
A09103 | The second is in his second interrogation, what needed any procurement by himselfe to himself? |
A09103 | The second thus: Doth he that taketh it, promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of Religion? |
A09103 | The third fallacy is in his other demaund, to whom could not the Bishop of Liege be reconciled, but to the Pope? |
A09103 | The title of S. Thomas h ● s Article is, VV ● ether Christians b ● 〈 ◊ 〉 to obey secular Powers, or not? |
A09103 | Then cōming to the matter, he demaundeth this question: Suppose it were not exactly translated, is not the sense all one? |
A09103 | This I say is the first Notandum: for if these things be indifferent, what need so much a doe about them? |
A09103 | This is as wise as the former: for I would faine know of M. Barlow, how there can be inc ● rti ● udo rei, vnles it be de futuris contingentibus? |
A09103 | Thus I said:& doth not Bellarmine allow this doctrine? |
A09103 | Thus the Cardinall ● Now let vs see what Syr William doth bring to impugne this doctrine, and to proue it contradictory? |
A09103 | To all this, what sayth M. Barlow? |
A09103 | To take any Oath that the Emperour Charles should propose vnto them? |
A09103 | To this what replyeth M. Barlow? |
A09103 | To what straites is M. Barlow driuen here? |
A09103 | To whome? |
A09103 | VVHETHER COVNCELS HAVE SVBMITTED THEMSELVES VNTO CHRISTIAN EMPERORS in Spi ● ituall affayres: and namely that of Arles to Charles the Great? |
A09103 | VVHETHER THE FOVRTH COVNCELL OF TOLEDO Did prescribe any such set forme of Oath to be exhibited to the Subiects, as is affirmed in the Apology? |
A09103 | VVHETHER THE POPE IN HIS BREVE DID FORBID TEMPORALL OBEDIENCE to his Maiesty of England? |
A09103 | VVas the act of cutting o ● the head of Queene Mary of Scotland a wicked act? |
A09103 | VVhat are you? |
A09103 | VVhat ignorance then is there in this Minister, so to write and triumph vpon lyes? |
A09103 | VVhat is this to the purpose? |
A09103 | VVhat is this( will he say) to the Popes consent for his POISONING? |
A09103 | VVhat of all this is seene in my Preface? |
A09103 | VVhat sayth our Doctour to this dilemma? |
A09103 | VVhere then are his labours? |
A09103 | VVill he not be ashamed to brag of Logike hearafter? |
A09103 | VVill they not s ● y when they haue the ● ● ip in their hands, as S. Peter said to his Maister, Parce tibi: be good to your sel ● e Syr? |
A09103 | VVould M. Barlow haue called it so in Queene Elizabeths dayes? |
A09103 | VVould he haue spoken so in his Saint Queenes life time? |
A09103 | WHETHER THE DENYING Of taking this New Oath doe include the deniall of all the particuler clauses contayned therin? |
A09103 | WHETHER THE OATH BE ONLY OF CIVILL OBEDIENCE? |
A09103 | Was almighty God wary in these speaches? |
A09103 | Was it for that they held him for their supreme Gouernour in all causes Ecclesiastiacll, and temporall? |
A09103 | Was it in her bones, or in her flesh, or skinne? |
A09103 | Was it the Protestant Church? |
A09103 | Was it whether there were euer any oath of Allegiance to temporall Princes allowed, or taken in the Christian world before this of ours? |
A09103 | Was there euer the like dealing or māner of answering, to out- face a man, against his owne words, proofs, and protestations? |
A09103 | Was there freedome in that choice? |
A09103 | Was this a wary and respect ● ue speach to so great a King, and Monarch? |
A09103 | Was this also the slip of the Printer? |
A09103 | We say first, that this is nothing to the purpose, noe more then, VVhich is the way to London? |
A09103 | Well Syr, and what will you infer of these two propositions? |
A09103 | Well Syr, and who I pray you were they? |
A09103 | Well then, this vncertainty being of the person, what saith he thereunto? |
A09103 | Well then, what saith M. Barlow to this conclusion? |
A09103 | Were not this a bad kind of arguing? |
A09103 | Were they these which you huddle togeather for strong presumptions, and vehementinducements, to proue that he would haue poisoned the Emperour? |
A09103 | Wh ● t was Nero? |
A09103 | What Author besides himselfe doth auerre it, in this manner, as he doth? |
A09103 | What Byshops were they? |
A09103 | What Vessels haue they consecrated thinke you? |
A09103 | What a Prelate is this ● or men to hang their soules vpon the truth of his words? |
A09103 | What answereth M. Barlow? |
A09103 | What can M. Ba ● low mislike in this? |
A09103 | What can be more ignorantly spoken then this, concerning the comparison of conclusions, and suppositions? |
A09103 | What can be spoken more seuerely to Princes then all this? |
A09103 | What coherence is there in this? |
A09103 | What contradiction of Corah and Dathan is there in them, that offer all obedience, and duty both to tēporall& spirituall Gouernours? |
A09103 | What demonstration was this? |
A09103 | What doth the matter appertayne to vs ● do we esteeme so litle a false Oath? |
A09103 | What feare of God or shame of the world is there here? |
A09103 | What if neither these words no ● the sense of them, be to be found in Matthew Paris( as indeed they are not) nor yet in any Author besides? |
A09103 | What is height of pryde and folly, if this be not? |
A09103 | What is that, which by these violent inducementes, as you terme them, you go now about to proue? |
A09103 | What is this( will he say) to t ● e Popes consent for his poysoning? |
A09103 | What malice is this in M. Barlow to report so sham ● ull an vntruth? |
A09103 | What man of sense will say this, but M. Barlow? |
A09103 | What may not be proued by Scriptures, where such application is allowed? |
A09103 | What meane our Schooles? |
A09103 | What misery is this of your cause to be driu ● n to these shiftes? |
A09103 | What more blind ignorance, and malicious dealing can be imagined then this? |
A09103 | What mourning garmentes were there seene throughout the whole Court, for this fact? |
A09103 | What need that expresse negatiue, if they were all one? |
A09103 | What new Articles are then here added to the Nycen Creed? |
A09103 | What orders had they? |
A09103 | What playne dealing is there in this? |
A09103 | What proofes are there for the one, more then for the other? |
A09103 | What replyeth M. Barlow to this? |
A09103 | What saist thou, o body of Christ? |
A09103 | What saith M. Barlow hereunto? |
A09103 | What say you then to the refusall of Eleazar in the Machabees, that refused with losse of life to eate swines- flesh? |
A09103 | What say you to the former answer made; to wit, that Iuli ● n was an Apostata, but our Soueraigne is a Christian? |
A09103 | What sayth M. Barlo ● to this? |
A09103 | What sequele or consequence is this? |
A09103 | What should Catholikes do? |
A09103 | What signe of sorrow, and publick affl ● ction? |
A09103 | What speach can be free from calumination, when such Sicophancy is vsed? |
A09103 | What still nothing but lying M. Barlow? |
A09103 | What then are th ● se great matters with which Innocentius is to be charged? |
A09103 | What then doth this make against me? |
A09103 | What then shall we say to this ground, or rather to this strong foundation,& inuincible bulwarke? |
A09103 | What then will you say was his meaning in those words, quae palea est, at Ecclesia pro grano habe ●? |
A09103 | What then? |
A09103 | What then? |
A09103 | What vanity hath their mouth spoken? |
A09103 | What was Diocles ● ● ●? |
A09103 | What were this to the purpose? |
A09103 | What will M. B ● ● low answere to all this? |
A09103 | What will he say of that crucifying our members, wherof the same Apostle speaketh? |
A09103 | What would he haue done, or said, if he had bene pressed with an Oath against his Conscience, or any least poynt of his Religion? |
A09103 | What would he haue said in greater matters? |
A09103 | What wresting, what forging is this? |
A09103 | What? |
A09103 | When or wherin then shall we find M. Barlow to deale pūctually, and sincerely? |
A09103 | Where I pray you was there any error at all? |
A09103 | Where did you learne your Logicke? |
A09103 | Where doth he mention these secret letters to the Patriarch? |
A09103 | Where is the Cloud of VVitnesses that should proue this? |
A09103 | Where shal I be safe& c? |
A09103 | Wherefore after foure hundred years, dost thou go about to teach vs that which before we knew not? |
A09103 | Wherein here standeth the contradiction? |
A09103 | Wherein then I pray you was this illegitimation? |
A09103 | Whereunto he answereth heere by a certayne demaund, in a parenthesis, VVho cast them out( to wit those of Liege) but the Pope? |
A09103 | Wherfore then doe I reprehend them? |
A09103 | Wherin did it consist? |
A09103 | Wherin hath the Apostle branded them? |
A09103 | Wherin then, or why are they said to haue submitted themselues? |
A09103 | Wherin then, or why is this submission, or rather r ● mission to the Emperour, and his iudgment? |
A09103 | Whether Councells haue submitted themselues vnto Christian Emperors in Spirituall affayres: and namely, that of Arles to Charles the great? |
A09103 | Whether a scandall passiue may fall euen vpon such men as are perfect? |
A09103 | Whether he that taketh the oath, do promise to belieue, or not to belieue, any article of Religion? |
A09103 | Whether the O ● th be only of ciuill obedience? |
A09103 | Whether the Pope in his Breue did forbid temporall Obedience to his Maiesty of England? |
A09103 | Whether the denying of taking this New Oath, do include the deniall of all the particul ● r clauses contayned therin? |
A09103 | Whether the deuising& vrging of this new Oath were a blessing or no, eyther to the Receauers or Vrgers? |
A09103 | Whether the fourth Councell of Toledo did prescribe any such set forme of Oath to be exhibited to the Subiects, as is affirmed in the Apology? |
A09103 | Which of these two M. Iewell wil you beleeue? |
A09103 | Which words being most plaine, who but an ignorant man, or most malicious, would translate Responsali, as from hi ● Chayre and Oracle? |
A09103 | Who euer heard wise man before draw an argument to proue one to be faulty for that he wrot in his owne defence? |
A09103 | Who gaue him his Iurisdiction? |
A09103 | Who imposed hands vpon him? |
A09103 | Who knoweth not, sayth he, that this word Only, doth not so much signify an hypocoristicall alleuiation, as a compendiary limitation? |
A09103 | Who seeth not the iniustice of this manner of dealing? |
A09103 | Who then should iudge, or giue sentence? |
A09103 | Who will not confesse this to be true? |
A09103 | Who would expect such monstrous doctrines, from the Chayre of a Prelate? |
A09103 | Who would write so absurdly, but M. Barlow, who seemeth not to vnderstand what he writeth? |
A09103 | Whom shall I trust? |
A09103 | Why did he alter them, and not recite them as I set them downe? |
A09103 | Why doth M. Barlow confine the matter to these Martyrs, that were deceased& shrined in those places of Germany, where the Emperours body lay? |
A09103 | Why doth he so closely couer& mince the narration, by telling vs a part, and not the whole, as it lyeth in the Author? |
A09103 | Why had he not tould vs plainely, what he findeth in him, concerning the credit o ● this his relation? |
A09103 | Why is God afrayd of them? |
A09103 | Why should M. Barlow leaue out the words( as it is said) and yet infer a certainty vpon his words? |
A09103 | Why should he vse such nipping& paring in his allegations, but that Iuglers must not be seene in all their knacks? |
A09103 | Why then doe Catholickes stand so much in England against the receiuing of this Oath? |
A09103 | Why then had he not decided the question as became a learned man, and a Prelate indeed? |
A09103 | Why then is this Canon brought in against vs? |
A09103 | Will M. Barlow confesse that his Church agreeth in this? |
A09103 | Will M. Barlow heere compare these two distinctions to Sedecias his two hornes? |
A09103 | Will M. Barlow say, that he sent two Chayres, or Oracles? |
A09103 | Will Protestants acknowledg this in their Creed? |
A09103 | Will euer Catholicke writer be found that dealeth so with authors? |
A09103 | Will he not blush at this vnhonest dealing herein? |
A09103 | Will he not blush, and be ashamed of this shameles calumniation, or rather forgery? |
A09103 | Will he refuse it? |
A09103 | Will he say perhaps of the Gentills? |
A09103 | Will he sweare it to be true? |
A09103 | Will their brethren the Protestants of France allow of this argument? |
A09103 | Will they acknowledge the Kings Supreme authority in causes Ecclesiasticall, as King Henry did challenge it? |
A09103 | With what face then can M. Barlow accuse me of the quite contrary, and so reuile against me for the same? |
A09103 | Would M. Barlow haue Christian men to sweare,& swallow vp a bundle of word ● knit togeather, without opening and looking into the ●? |
A09103 | Would no one of them set it downe in their writings, or so much as make mention therof? |
A09103 | Yea, with what conscience can he say, that this reuelation may be an illusion? |
A09103 | Yf it be the truth you seeke, why vse you so many and so manifest lyes? |
A09103 | You aske also whether the Catholiks be no better instructed in Deuinity by their Priests? |
A09103 | You will demaund then, what is S. Paul his meaning, when he saith, as here M. Barlow relateth him, that an Oath is the end of all controuersies? |
A09103 | You will not, I trust, fall to the same absurdity of seeking dissimilitudes, that are from the point of the comparison it self? |
A09103 | a ● candalum ● candalum Magnatum? |
A09103 | aboundance of almes? |
A09103 | all manner of ordinance? |
A09103 | among al the Priests secular& ● esuited in Englād, that can determine a controuersy about the Oath of Allegiance? |
A09103 | an oppressor and an Idolatour? |
A09103 | and countenanced by two Cardinals, Cai ● tan and Burghesius be sufficient? |
A09103 | and had they no validity? |
A09103 | and in respect of Kings a license for disloyalty in their subiects, and their allumetts of treason to their ● ersons? |
A09103 | and that he had in expresse tearmes abused his Maiesty, with the charge of offering ● buse to the Pope? |
A09103 | and that in a time of Infidell Princes, as was that of S. Peter, who might, and did ordaine many thinges against the Lord? |
A09103 | and where haue you lurked so long? |
A09103 | and why then did you euen now deny it? |
A09103 | and willeth them inclusiuely to deny the Trinity? |
A09103 | and without limitation at all? |
A09103 | and yet, had he not sufficient time to deliberate? |
A09103 | aut quem? |
A09103 | by Diuinity or Philosophy? |
A09103 | did he euer heare her Confession? |
A09103 | doe not these words well beseem& adorne an English stile? |
A09103 | doe you heare him say now, that in deed her dea ● h was a misery to the whol ● land? |
A09103 | doe you heare him tell vs, that the blot thereo ● is indele ● le? |
A09103 | doth it appertaine any thing to our purpose? |
A09103 | for what needed any procurement by himselfe to himselfe?) |
A09103 | from all publike taxes,& labour, to the end they may attend to se ● ue God more freely? |
A09103 | he became an Ethnicke, but our King is not ashamed of his profession, and other such like differences? |
A09103 | he denyeth him to be skilfull in the Greek tongue& c? |
A09103 | his Commentaryes? |
A09103 | his Epistles Theologicall? |
A09103 | his Iudiciall Decis ● ● s? |
A09103 | his Sermons? |
A09103 | his Treatises? |
A09103 | his doctrinall determinations? |
A09103 | is here no menacing extrusion threatned to Princes whē they are threatned to be crushed like a potters vessell? |
A09103 | is it in the abstract, because there is an Oath commanded? |
A09103 | is it not a shame for a Doctor to wander vp& down from the purp ● s ● e? |
A09103 | is not Recusancy a case of conscience? |
A09103 | is not he worthy to pretend a Bishopricke, that hath no more wit then this? |
A09103 | not among Catholiks? |
A09103 | o members of our Sauiour, you that are Children of God, and not aliens, what say you? |
A09103 | or Catholickes in England should take the Oath for auoyding the penaltyes of the Statute? |
A09103 | or account to be giuen of such en ● rmous slaunders, especially touching bloud? |
A09103 | or any such Philosophy taught before, or Diuinity? |
A09103 | or did the very refusall argue, as there is said, that he had liberty of choice, and therupon disloyalty of affection? |
A09103 | or doth he answere one word to the plaine testimony of Scriptures, alleadged out of Toby, Iob, and S. Paul for proofe therof, all cyted by me? |
A09103 | or doth he vse the tearmes of vndeuinelike doctrine? |
A09103 | or how farre extends it? |
A09103 | or how m ● y they settle it? |
A09103 | or is not this rather profound ignorance and absurdity in you to say so? |
A09103 | or to exprobrate the want thereof vnto me? |
A09103 | or what sense of grammer, or coherence of phrase would those latyn wordes make, for so much as I wrot in English? |
A09103 | or whereof doth this consequence sauour but of folly only and malice? |
A09103 | or will he teach this magisteriall doctrine o courtesy to be practised in the Court at this day? |
A09103 | q ● id de ● ique iste ● qui ● oc tempore ● ● ● lesiam persequitur? |
A09103 | quid Dioclesi ● ● ● s? |
A09103 | refusall of dignities,& temporall commodities? |
A09103 | so blasphemous, as to auou ● h the same? |
A09103 | so pretended, so printed so published, so diuulged to the world? |
A09103 | the Bishop could not be reconciled( to whom but to the Pope, who had accursed both Church and Churchmen at Liege, for burying the Emperour?) |
A09103 | to beat men with ● ● uo ● s to take the Oath? |
A09103 | to wit, that shee must fly, when shee seeth the wolfe? |
A09103 | vbi tam diu latuistis? |
A09103 | vnde,& quando venistis? |
A09103 | what chopping, what changing what mistaking is there heere? |
A09103 | what haue we to doe with thee? |
A09103 | what if he neuer knew of any such attempt, nor beleiued, that there were any such really designed? |
A09103 | what is he who at this time, doth persecute the Church? |
A09103 | what shal be done to him that knetcheth this opprobrious Curr? |
A09103 | what shall I say? |
A09103 | when did euer the iudgment of the Church take authority from the Emperour?) |
A09103 | whence, and when came you? |
A09103 | whether there be free election giuen in taking the Oath, or n ●? |
A09103 | whether this choice, I say, be absolutely free, or no? |
A09103 | who can say so but vpon ignorance, or malice? |
A09103 | who knoweth not, that the fayrest title is put vpon the fowlest matter, when it is ● o be perswaded or ● xacted? |
A09103 | who seeth not, that there is nothing heere but trifling, and caueling? |
A09103 | why 〈 ◊ 〉 Re ● usantes punished, and fined for Recusancy, though they take the Oath o ● Allegiance? |
A09103 | wil not his friends blush for him in this behalfe? |
A09103 | yea how doth he cite S. Thomas for that which so plainly 〈 ◊ 〉 gainsaieth and refuteth? |
A09103 | ● or here he nameth both: and if Salomon found it by Diuinity, what needed M. Barlow to add that he was no meane Philosopher? |