Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A86626What reformed forren Church wil acknowledg Him Defender of the Faith, when they hear of this?
A91204And is not this plain way of God, the safest for you and the Army to follow, yea the only short cut to peace and settlement?
A91204So had Alexander, but Alexander was poysoned, and what then became of his Army?
A91204are they so deep in the hearts of the people, that they can assure themselves the newtrals, or those who have gone farre with them will quiesce?
A91204or army yet got so much love?
A57590Qualem nos pacem vobiscum habituros speremus?
A57590Whereto the Consul thus replied, Quid si poenam remittimus?
A57355By the Ever- renowned Knight Sir WALTER RALEIGH, Published By JOHN MILTON Esq Quis Martem tunica tectum, Adamantina digne scripserit?
A57355Qualem nos patem vobiscum habituros speremus?
A57355Whereto the Consul thus replied, Quid si poenam remittimus?
A57360By the Ever- renowned Knight, Sir WALTER RALEIGH, Published By JOHN MILTON, Esq; Quis Martem tunicâ tectum Adamantinâ dignè scripserit?
A57360Qualem nos pacem vobiscum habituros speremus?
A57360Quis innocens esse potest si accusare sufficit?
A57360Whereto the Consul thus replied, Quid si p ● enam remittimus?
A343651. we find Saul, and that by Gods appointment( where the Text faith) hath not the Lord annointed thee to be Governour over his inheritance?
A34365You will say, what?
A34365must men then think and believe manifest lyes?
A450013 expresly excluding Forreigners from the Crown?
A45001But I would fain ask the Regions Defenders, by what Law they can maintain Governments, to be inherent in one, and to be transmitted to his Off spring?
A45001If they say by the Law of God I would again demand how they can make this Law appear to me?
A94080But why should you or any body expect Philisophy, where there is no sense?
A94080If he had not told us this, we had never guessed so much: But what did Mr. Prynne discover?
A94080Is Monarchy the best of Governments?
A94080Might not Mr. Prynne as well have quoted any text in Scripture, in which the name of King is mentioned?
A94080So is there not as great a danger now as ever, of the Nation?
A94080What then?
A94080and take them up that we may lay them down at the feet of Kings together with our necks, to be trampled on?
A94080may we only use arms to provoke, not secure?
A47901Did not every one, that had any thing like an estate, pinch himself in his condition, to purchase a knight- hood or smal Patent?
A47901Every one that hath not, to raise one?
A47901Or a State, which is the meer Adjective of an Army, becomes a Substantive; beginnings of this kinde being so ominous?
A47901To Conclude, what shall I add?
A47901To this end, do not our very Yeomen commonly leave their Lands to the eldest Son, and to the others, nothing but a Flail or Plough?
A47901What need further proof?
A41311A Question may be, Whether a Prince be subject to the Laws of his Countrey that he hath sworn to keep, or not?
A41311And where the Mastery is gained over us by no other force than that of Perswasion, who would forego the pleasure of Obedience?
A41311And yet of so sweet a Tyranny, who that are under it can complain?
A41311Arguments so prevailing, who is able to withstand?
A41311For does he overcome others?
A41311How many good and innocent Princes should as Tyrants perish by the Conspiracy of their Subjects against them?
A41311O how many Tyrants should there be, if it should be lawful for Subjects to kill Tyrants?
A41311Or does he govern in their stead?
A41311What if a Prince by Law forbid to Kill or Steal, is he not Bound to obey his own Laws?
A41311Who should He be that could Give the Law, being he himself constrain''d to Receive it of them, unto whom he himself Gave it?
A61099But will you heare God himselfe taking cognisance of the misgovernance of Princes, and determining of it?
A61099For it will lye against every particular man, betweene God and his conscience to answer, who hath called thee to this?
A61099For what shall be sufficient necessity?
A61099How wert thou not afraid( saith he) to stretch forth thy hand to destroy the Lords annointed?
A61099The misgovernance is great and the consequence of it desperate, but does God in that case give the people power to reforme?
A61099Then he expostul ● teth the matter with wicked Princes, How long will ye give wrong judgement and accept the persons of the wicked?
A61099Therefore omitting those places of Scripture, It is not fit to say to a King thou art wicked, Who may say to a King, what doest thou?
A61099and who shall be judge of it?
A61099what way, and how farr may Subjects so proceed?
A61099who hath made thee a Iudge or an Executor of these matters?
A61099who hath separated thee?
A61099who shall commaund?
A96861How short of art doth thy rage fall unskillfull Sultan with a Bowstring or Scymiter to snach life from an offending slave?
A96861O what a blessed thing is want of money, and how bountifull are Kings when they are quite beggared?
A96861To which the King floutingly answered, saying, Lady Countesse; have the Lords made you a Charter, and sent you to be their Prolocutrix?
A96861will you deny unto him what everyone of you as you list may doe?
A426741. hath Israel no sons?
A42674: 1688?]
A42674But how is this immediately from the Law of Nature, when there comes a voluntary act of man between?
A42674Here three questions arise, one touching resignation, whither a King can give up his power?
A42674How knows the Objector, that every King, who fights for his own, makes such an ungodly appeal?
A42674Suppose both parties are so presumptuous, how knows he, that God is bound to listen to every presumptuous Appellant, and give judgment at his beck?
A42674WHether the consent of the people conquered, and their submission to the Conqueror gives him a title?
A42674WHither Kings,& c. can deprive themselves of supreme power, or give it from the right heirs?
A42674WHither a long possession can make the Conqueror''s title good?
A42674but, Who hath appointed me?
A42674hath he no heir?
A42674s.n.,[ London?
A42674why then doth their King inherit Gad, and his people dwell in his Cities?
A42674‖ what have I to do to judge them, that are without?
A41310An implicite Faith is given to the meanest Artificer in his own Craft, how much more is it then due to a Prince in the profound Secrets of Government?
A41310Art thou pleased that our upright Laws and Customs be observed, and dost thou promise that those shall be protected ● nd maintained by thee?
A41310Had the Patriarchs their Power given them by their own Children?
A41310Here I would fain know who shall judge of this lawful Cause?
A41310Is there any Example of it ever found in the Whole World?
A41310It may be demanded what becomes of the Right of Fatherhood, in Case the Crown does escheate for want of an Heir?
A41310Was a General Meeting of a Whole Kingdom ever known for the Election of a Prince?
A41310What can a Heathen say more?
A41310When the Jews asked our Blessed Sa ● ur, whether they should pay Tri ● e?
A41310Whether doth it not then Devolve to the People?
A8668312. that the time of the Church''s dissipation shall be 1290. dayes?
A8668313. to have but two horns, and here to have seven Heads, and ten Horns?
A86683But how comes this Beast to have seven heads, and ten Horns, since he is none of the Roman Heads?
A86683But suppose there were never a Jew converted, must this make the purpose of God of none effect?
A86683How can two be more contrary?
A86683How is he the Beast that is?
A86683How was all dasht, and that happy work retanded on a sudden?
A86683Now if Daniel, in his Prophesie, should onely respect the Gentile Church, how could Iohn, Christ, and Daniel, be reconciled in their prophefies?
A86683READER: I Have taken upon me one of the hardest Taskes this day in the World, and who am I that undertake it?
A86683What if I did assert this?
A36358A Bedlam Babel; what do you call it, Where Rowlands will is rul''d by Randals wit?
A36358Ahab his sons and Queen came to disaster, And had false Zimri peace, who slew his Master?
A36358Did Absalom or Adonijah thrive?
A36358God promised to Abraham Kings of''s ● eed; Of his svvorn truths vvorld you make lyes?
A36358How was it then you''l say in Holland seen?
A36358If Heirs are blest of God, Usurpers curst, From Brute, what King had title e''re more just?
A36358Nay, what''s a Common- wealth, but Common Whore?
A36358That ours was Ante- Christ who can deny, Whose Horns gor''d Christ, whose Heads did him defie?
A36358WIth Alpha and Omega to Begin, Of Monarchs Monarch, of all kings the King; Doth he not govern all the World alone?
A36358What did our Slaves States do in twelve years space, But Sword mens wills o''re those in highest Place?
A36358What is a Commonwealth, but common woe, Where each mans wealth''s made common unto moe?
A36358What is become of those conspir''d the death Of Englands Mother, call''d Queen Elizabeth, And for their Countries ruine close did wait?
A41308An implicite Faith is given to the meanest Artificer in his own Craft, how much more is it then due to a Prince in the profound Secrets of Government?
A41308Art thou pleased that our upright Laws and Customs be observed, and dost thou promise that those shall be protected and maintained by thee?
A41308Do we not find, that in every Family, the Government of One Alone, is most Natural?
A41308For indeed, it is the Rule of Solomon, that We must keep the King''s Commandment, and not to say, What dost Thou?
A41308Had the Patriarchs their Power given them by their own Children?
A41308Here I would fain know who shall judge of this lawful Cause?
A41308Is there any Example of it ever found in the Whole World?
A41308It may be demanded what becomes of the Right of Fatherhood, in Case the Crown does escheate for want of an Heir?
A41308Was a General Meeting of a Whole Kingdom ever known for the Election of a Prince?
A41308What can a Heathen say more?
A41308When the Iews asked our Blessed Saviour, whether they should pay Tribute?
A41308Whether doth it not then Devolve to the People?
A6447813. why hast thou broken down her Hedges?
A6447821 In those dayes there was no King in Israel, and what follows?
A64478And was not the Blasphemer stoned to Death?
A64478And what do you think of Life it self, if there were no Government?
A64478Did not he lift up his Eyes to Heaven when he prayed for Lazarus, and fell on his Face when he prayed in his Agony?
A64478Hath not Conscience Influence upon both?
A64478I durst Appeal to these persons, Whether they would do the same in their Addresses to any of us that are in Commission of the Peace?
A64478Is not Gods Glory concerned in one as well as the other?
A64478Or are the things of God less precious than the things of Men?
A64478What a shame is this?
A64478Who can hear this and not stand astonished?
A64478Would it not be a Burthen to us, for to live?
A64478Would not all things lye wast and common?
A64478Would not every Mans Lands and Goods become the possession of the strongest?
A64478and, to be born, a Misfortune?
A64478when Holy Writ it self, doth so pregnantly conclude the same thing?
A44749Another time having discoursd of many things with the King in a privat audience in French, the King askd him whether he understood Latin or no?
A44749But then how did that Masculine Queen, that notable Virago, bestir her self?
A44749But what Exchanges and recompence did Spain make to America for all this?
A44749Hear what the famous Poet Claudian sings of Her in this Rapture: Quod dignum memorare tuis Hispania Terris Vox Humana valet?
A44749How many Ordinaries are ther in Paris of Pistol- price, and the Tables servd all in Plate?
A44749How strongly did Spain tug with the Arrian Heresie till she was quite put upon her back, and at last converted?
A44749If the Apothecaries of Florence are such, what shall we think of their Physitians?
A44749Now, where doth this most useful Commodity grow more plentiful then in France?
A44749Quas Gentes olim non contrivere?
A44749Te Duce Germanis pietas se vera, Fidesque Insinuans coepit ritus abolere prophanos; Quid non Alcuino facunda Lutetia debet?
A44749The Ambassador and Luynes having mingled some Speeches, the language of Luynes was very haughty, saying, What hath your Master to do with our Affairs?
A44749The older still the likelier for to die; Wold you wish your own ruine?
A44749Touching the French Wines, it may be said they need no Bush: what vast proportions are carried away by all the Northwest Nations?
A44749What a coyle do the Historians keep about the Achievements of Alexander the Great?
A44749What a hazardous peece of service was performed when we invaded Barbary at Tunis?
A44749What glorious Expeditions have bin made since in the Holy Land by five several Kings of France in person?
A44749What thick swarms of Bees, and delicat Hony is found in every Peasans Garden?
A44749but especially that desperat Exploit Blague did at the Canaries?
A44749how magnanimously did she view her Musters, and encouragd the soldiers, riding up and down with a Plume of Feathers in her Hat like another Boadicia?
A44749how suddenly was there a great Fleet in a readiness, and an Army by Land?
A44749why doth he meddle with our Actions?
A240836 e 4 30 What Cony catehers are here 〈 ◊ 〉?
A24083And can that be a Sign which signifies nothing?
A24083Are the Jewes marching towerds Jerusalem or no?
A24083Brother Commoner, tell me this, and tell me but the truth, Was Christ the Prince of Peace, or was he the son of Bellona?
A24083But what say Authors to it?
A24083Can neither the Mercies nor Judgments of God move them to repentance?''
A24083Come they not from our lusts, because we are carnal?
A24083Did not he appoint them for SIGNS and SEASONS?
A24083Did not he set them to RULE the Day and the Night?
A24083Doth not thy Government please thee?
A24083For Sailors to sail by, you say: 〈 ◊ 〉 is very well; and is that all?
A24083HOw many good Aspects happen this Moneth?
A24083Hark ye Priests, 〈 ◊ 〉 ye: I, but what Clergy men are here threatened?
A24083Hath God preserved thee all this while in these civil Wars for nothing else?
A24083Have you built you a Fools Paradise in the Ayr?
A24083I pray you,( you that despise Astrology,) wherefore( do you think) did God make the Stars?
A24083IN passing Judgment upon this Quarter, I will steer a different course from all the rest; and why do you think I do so?
A24083If London finde a sickly time in May, what will it do in July?
A24083JEHOVAH hath said thus, What I have planted am I plucking up, and what I have built am I plucking down; and 〈 ◊ 〉 thou great things to thy self?
A24083Jupiter is Lord of the Eclipse in his fall, and in M. C. he is Lord of the nineth also: What?
A24083Lawyers, a word or two with you; Have you taken a Lease of your places?
A24083Moons Latitude Just at beginning, Saturns lowring eye Molests the Earth with a disquiet sky?
A24083NOw every one lookes to himselfe; Can Subjects finde no other time to Rebell but when Winter drawes on?
A24083O Citizens, Citizens, why should you go about to undo your selves?
A24083Storms above, and stormy Actions below: and what will the end be?
A24083Take notice( about the latter end of this Moneth) what unusual sights thou seest in the Ayr; Doth thy God do any thing in vain?
A24083The Florentines can not be quiet; what''s the matter with them; are they too rich?
A24083The Governor of Souldiers Mars is angular in, the Fourth; He was in the Sixth in the Spring: What, must the sickness end in the Grave?
A24083The Priests teach for hire, and the Prophets divine for money, yet will they lean upon the Lord, and say, Is not the Lord amongst us?
A24083The Prophets prophecy falsly, and the Priests bear Rule by their means, and the people love to have it so, and what will the end be?
A24083There hath been many Mutinies in thee; didst thou ever get any thing by them?
A24083Well then, if you will not beleeve the Scripture, will you beleeve Diogenes?
A24083What difference is there betweene a Prince and my Selfe when wee are dead; nay when a Prince is but asleepe, what is hee the better for his Kingdome?
A24083What felicity do they promise?
A24083What have men no more wit yet, then to run after a company of prating Priests and Lawyers?
A24083What, does the Lawyers go about to contend with the State?
A24083What, must Priests lose their Tythes?
A24083Will former examples do thee no good?
A24083Wo be to the 〈 ◊ 〉 that feed themselves, should not the shepherds feed the flock?
A24083or be they Judges?
A24083or what be they?
A24083will the Clergy begin to vapor, and stand upon their pantibles once more before their final end?
A24083would the Commonalty turn Magistrates?
A58824And doe not the Fathers assent to the same?
A58824And hath it not been so ever since?
A58824And is he not so in the judgement of reason?
A58824And now, Beloved judge your selves, whether it is fitter to obey God or man, as the Apostles spake in another case?
A58824And was it not so afterwards?
A58824Belial, what?
A58824But by the Prophet of God, it is resolved for God, saying, see you him whom the Lord hath chosen?
A58824But hath it beene so with the Kings of England?
A58824But what then?
A58824Children of Belial, how?
A58824Did the Divel beget these men in my Text?
A58824I begin with the first, the description of Rebels, in the first words; the children of Belial saied: And first, what is here meant by Belial?
A58824In a word, the inferiour Governours are made by the cheife, and who is the chiefe but the King?
A58824In the expostulation, the saucie expostulation of Rebells, How shall this man save us?
A58824None, no man, no assembly of men, who but God?
A58824See yee him, Quem populus elegit?
A58824That''s for the Jewes, you le say; It is true, and it is as true of the Nations too; what else meanes Isaiah''s Vnctus Cyrus?
A58824The children of Belial said, How shall this man save us?
A58824They account the King but as one of themselves, and as one chosen by themselves; and therefore they saied, How shall this man save us?
A58824They did malè dicere, saying, How shall this man save us?
A58824Thus it was in the daies of Moses and the Prophets; and was it not thus in the dayes of Christ and his Apostles?
A58824To this is is answered by the children of Belial for the people; saying, How shall this man, This man, and no more, save us?
A58824What else meanes Solomons Per me Reges regnant?
A58824What reason have they for it?
A58824Whether God or the People be the Author and Efficient of Monarchie?
A58824Whether God or the people bee the author and efficient of Monarchy?
A58824Whether it be Lawfull for Subjects to beare Armes, or to Contribute for the maintenance of a Warre against the King?
A58824Whether it be lawfull for Subjects to beare armes, or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King?
A58824Whether it be lawfull to beare Armes, or to contribute for the maintenance of a Warre against the King?
A58824Whether the King be Singulis major, but Universis minor?
A58824Whether the King bee universis minor, lesse then the body representative?
A58824Why else did Christ acknowledge Pilates power to be de super?
A58824Why, it was because they looked on him as a single man, how shall this man save us?
A58824Will you heare another Naturalist, little inferiour to this, say the same?
A58824You see what is meant by these words, they despised him; will you now see why they despised him?
A58824],[ London?
A58824and at his Coronation he is wedded to the Kingdome with a Ring: Why else doe wee call the King Caput Regni?
A58824and hath not every body a head?
A58824and the unfolding of my second question, which is, Whether the King be Singulis major, but Vniversis minor?
A58824or else, how and why are they called the children of Belial?
A58824whether God or the People be the Author of Monarchie?
A58824whether it be lawfull for subjects to beare armes or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King?
A58824whether it be lawfull for subjects to beare armes or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King?
A58824whether the King be singulis major, but universis minor?
A58824whether the King be singulis major, but universis minor?
A58824why else doe we call the Ring Sponsus Regni?
A34420( for what would the Egyptians then have said?)
A34420( for who will buy his neighbours goods so taken from him but will be sure of a good penny- worth?)
A344201, 2, 3, 4. why doe the Heathen rage, and the people imagine a vaine thing?
A344201. and did not Ioseph and Mary of their own accord goe up from Galilee into Iudea to be taxed?
A3442011. shall such men as wee, doe good works by the halfes?
A3442012. how is the faithfull City become an harlot?
A3442012. sayes Hazael, why weepeth my Lord?
A3442026. will not the Lord be intreated to save the people for good Iosiahs sake?
A344205. is such one likely to be a governor of Gods appointment?
A344205. nay did not Iesus Iesus Christ himselfe worke a miracle to pay tribute for himselfe and Peter, for Caesars service?
A344209, 10, 11. that God set up Saul to be King?
A344209. the mighty Hunter, what did he hunt?
A34420And Hazael said, but what is thy servant a dog, that he should do this great thing?
A34420And why so?
A34420Can it be the minde of God that the Trees of the Forrest should have a bramble to raigne over them?
A34420Indeed I have done wickedly, but these sheep what have they done?
A34420Is not Monarchy more pompeous and like the Heathens?
A34420May I crave leave to insert an historicall observation?
A34420Shallum the son of Iabe ● h conspired against him and smote him before the people, and slew him, and reigned in his steed, what?
A34420The Wisemen are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken, they have rejected the Word of the Lord, and what wisedom is in them?
A34420VVhat then shall I doe when God riseth up, and when he visiteth, what shall I answer him?
A34420Why would the Lord have the walls of Ierica beaten downe with the sound of a Rams- horne onely, but that the more of his own power might appeare?
A34420abhorre thy poore worme Iacob and his fathers pompe and best condition?
A34420and did not one fashion us in the wombe?
A34420and is not subjection commanded to the Roman Emperors( that were some of thē monsters of men?
A34420and what vaine things were Parliaments, as building of Castles in the Aire?
A34420and why doe you thrust me?
A34420did not he that made me in the wombe, make him?
A34420is not example a morall violence?
A34420or if so, what shall we say of the Kings of Israel& Iudah?
A34420this was ratified by Act of Parliament, but what followed?
A34420why was there no more ceremonies used in the cleansing of Namaan but wash and be cleane; are not other waters as good?
A86729( which else would have been done heretofore;) Or do they engage to them only as their Trustees or Servants?
A867291. bids us neither to sit with, nor stand with, nor walk with, not to have the least communion with?
A86729And if so, by whom?
A86729And if they when they meet and sit restore King and Lords, which now are thrown down, do they break this Engagement?
A86729And so if King and Lords should raise an Army to recover their Authority, whether he that refuseth to fight against them do break his Engagement?
A86729And who are they that put this in execution, but they that entred into the same Covenant with us?
A86729Do we engage to the present Power absolutely or conditionally?
A86729Doth this Engagement take away the Power of the next Parliament?
A86729If by Commonwealth be meant the present Government( as the words[ Now Established] would make us think it is) then what is it that is established?
A86729If the present House shall again change their Judgments, and set up King and Lords, or require us to swear to them, must we obey or resist them?
A86729If this next Parliament shall so re- establish King and Lords, and will not rule without them, must we resist all, and be without any Government?
A86729Is the meaning, that we shall be true and faithful to the Common- wealth whiles King and Lords are excluded?
A86729My Lord, We beseech you to consider what Ministers they are that are persecuted; for what, and by whom they are persecuted?
A86729Or if they dissolve, whether the next must be annual or triennial, or of duration of their own pleasure as this?
A86729Or that we shall endeavor also to continue their exclusion?
A86729Or whether in the secundary borrowed sence, for the Body of the Representative?
A86729Or whether the thing be changed with the name?
A86729That they will defend them in the work that they set them about?
A86729To they know not what?
A86729What is the meaning of the word[ Common- wealth?]
A86729What it is that is imposed?
A86729What''s meant by( true and faithful,) whether only to do them no wrong, or not to be perfidious?
A86729Where is that liberty of conscience they so much pleaded for before they got to be supreme, is not that forgot now?
A86729Whether is it meant in the primary proper sence, for the Body of the Nation, or for the common good of that Body?
A86729Whether it be only an exclusive Engagement, as being against King and Lords, without including any Government in their stead to which we engage?
A86729Whether the word( Now) have reference to the first Calling of this House of Commons, or to any alteration since made?
A86729Whether this House to be perpetuated?
A86729Whether( if it be meant in the latter sence) by Common- wealth be meant a Parliament, or a House of Commons, chosen as formerly?
A86729Woe unto us, were ever poor Protestants so miserably deluded?
A86729and by what Authority was that change made?
A86729and do they not condemne themselves in doing one, and not the other?
A86729and if they do the like, what must we do?
A86729and so give away their Supremacy?
A86729and when?
A86729are these the Saints that cryed out against persecution of tender Consciences?
A86729is this the removing of the yoak of oppression and Tyranny?
A86729is this the year of our liberty so much boasted of by many?
A86729is this the year of throwing down Antichrist, and propagating the Gospel of Jesus Christ?
A86729or by any other way, and how?
A86729or else to obey them?
A86729or further to engage and hazard our estates and lives on their behalf, or how far?
A86729or how?
A86729or is it so natural to them, that they can not give it away?
A86729or must we endeavor to choose a new Parliament?
A86729or were there ever such notorious grosse Hypocrites, Apostate Pasters in the world?
A86729or whether chosen as formerly?
A86729whether an intire House of Commons, or not intire?
A86729whether only the present House, or all future, or any future?
A66571''s time declar''d by Parliament, incapable of Succession?
A66571''s time, and their Rabbles, could have done any mischief?
A66571( Nay, after he had been declared, Heir apparent) and was not Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth, the same?
A66571( which is another of the same) who may say unto him, What do''st thou?
A6657112. say unto Samuel, Who is he that said, Shall Saul reign over us?
A66571Admitting what has been before offer''d, wherein has our present King merited less than any of his Royal Ancestors?
A66571Admitting what has been before offer''d, wherein has our present King merited less than any of his Royal Ancestors?
A66571An Obedience, to be reckon''d for Righteousness?
A66571And because he has deserv''d too much, will nothing but an Ostracism pay off his Debentures?
A66571And has not that fulness of Bread, provok''d them into wantonness?
A66571And if so, how are they to be entrusted with themselves?
A66571And if so, what mean these new Trains, to the old Fuel?
A66571And is not this fine stuff?
A66571And must he after all this be smother''d in his own Perfumes?
A66571And now what can be added more, but the Purse, without which, what''s the Sword, but( as the Greek Proverb has it) A Bow, without a Bow- man?
A66571And now, every thing following the good fortune of Caesar, it was not said to the Senate, And will ye be last to bring the Conqueror home?
A66571And since their happy Restauration, what Private Person made more Honorable Hazards at Home?
A66571And was not this a perfect love between a King and his People?
A66571And what could the world have design''d him more, than what the eepectation of his mighty Birth must( by course of Nature) have given him?
A66571And what fruit( I pray) did we reap of those Wars?
A66571And who shall be Judg of that?
A66571And yet methinks the Game is playing over again, or else, what meaneth this bleeting of the Sheep, and lowing of the Oxen?
A66571And yet who knows, but there may be somewhat more than we see?
A66571And yet, what new paths do we take to our selves?
A66571But, may some say, have not such things been done before?
A66571Did ever Dog swallow a Cork without Butter?
A66571Harold usurp''d on Edgar Atheling, and what was the effect of it?
A66571Henry the Fourth on Richard the Second, and Richard the Third, on Edward the Fifth; were they not founded in Blood, and defended with more?
A66571How can that man sleep securely, over whose head, a drawn Sword hangs by a single Hair?
A66571How much of the night of Popery and darkness remains?
A66571How much therefore, have the people more need of a Pendulum, than Fly; somewhat to moderate, not multiply the motion?
A66571How near are we to the taking the possession?
A66571How will the Three Estates be made out, before the Commons came in?
A66571How will the Three Estates be made out, before the Commons came in?
A66571Is it all pure Religion, and undefil''d: All dry, down- right conscience?
A66571Is not his Royal Highness the Son of that King, whom our late Parliaments have so often declar''d a Martyr?
A66571Is there no old grudg?
A66571Must those Glories he reapt from the Enemy, serve him only as so many Garlands to a destin''d Sacrifice?
A66571No biass?
A66571No interest?
A66571No man yet, ever chang''d his condition, but in hopes of bettering it: Hath a Nation chang''d their gods, which yet, are no Gods?
A66571No self in the case?
A66571No — Manet altâ mente repôstum?
A66571No — Spreti injuria?
A66571Nor would it be less enquir''d, who were the persons suppos''d to have made the contract?
A66571Or a Son, such a Father?
A66571Or did ever men reckon the Sun the less, that it had suffer''d an Eclipse?
A66571Religion is not the matter, but following, and Parties: Is it peace Jehu?
A66571That the People were so beset, is agreed of all hands: Whither do Rheumes, and Humors resort, but to the weakest parts?
A66571Was ever Prince yet content, to see another sit on his Throne?
A66571Was not the Childrens Bread thrown among them, while the helpless Orphans scarce lickt up the Crums?
A66571What causes that Thunder in the Clouds, but the cross encounter of Fire and Water, mutually tending to their centre of safety?
A66571What hast thou to do with peace?
A66571What mischiefs, did the Army of God, and the Church( for so they stil''d themselves) in King John''s time?
A66571What( I say) might he not have done?
A66571Where were these three Estates, before the Commons came in to be a third Estate?
A66571Which was the better Son, he that said he would not go, but went, or he that said he would go, but went not?
A66571Who ever put a Sword into a mad- mans hand to keep the Peace with?
A66571Would any one( think ye) submit, to be brain''d by a Billet, albeit in amends it were said to his Heir, the like shall never be done to your self?
A66571and g ● ld Pills, for men of riper years?
A66571and how long may we be kept off ere the Scepter of the Kingdom be advanced?
A66571and if not, who made the inequality?
A66571and shall we despise Truth because''t is a novelty?
A66571or admitting it were to be done, how are we sure, that he that is to come after, shall always continue of the same opinion?
A66571or entrusted an Ape to range in a Glass- shop?
A66571or even a Fool, Angle, without hiding his Hook in a Bait?
A66571or how are we secure, he shall not be worse?
A66571or if equal, who could summon the rest?
A66571or rather, were they not such, as of which the Poet speaks?
A66571or when met, regulate, preside, or moderate?
A66571or whether all, without difference of Sex, Age, or Condition, were admitted to drive the bargain?
A66571or who should that Prince be, that could give the Law, being himself constrain''d to receive it of his Subjects, unto whom also, he gave it?
A66571or( like Larks) dar''d to the Net, with every thing?
A66571was the Servants interest( if yet such a thing could be among equals) equal with the Masters?
A66571was there ever a more exact, or entire Obedience?
A66571— Quis talia fando, Temperet?
A66571— What private Gentleman could have born it?
A29958Albeit the People shall command him to reigne, think you that he should be called a King?
A29958And lastly when shall he get leave to rest?
A29958And therefore seeing we are fallen in to make mention of Tyrrants, may it please you, that straight way we proceed to speak of them?
A29958And when you was doing that, wot you what came into my mind?
A29958And would they willingl ● redact themselves into bondage to him, wh ● ● was to possess a lawfull Kingdome in stea ● of some benefit?
A29958Are not sadless, girdings and spurrs made for horses?
A29958Are not the things which for some others sake are institute, of less account than those for whose sake they are required or sought?
A29958Are they not troubled by that same intestine conflict?
A29958As they have not been so prudent, do you imagine that the people were so foolish, as to neglect an occasion so opportune put into their hand?
A29958B ▪ Do you ask, where?
A29958B. Shall we not call these Precepts of Grammarians and Physicians Arts and Lawes also, and so of others?
A29958B. Shall we not then account these Precepts to be Art?
A29958B: And is it not equitable that a judge lay aside such persons as may prejudge the sentence?
A29958B: But do lawes seeme to have been made according to the idea of him?
A29958B: But which of the two hath the authority from the other, whether the judge from the Law, or the Law from the judge?
A29958B: Call to mind what was said a little before: did we not say, that the voice of the King and of the Law is the same?
A29958B: Doth not he who first recedes from what is covenanted, and doth contrary to what he hath covenanted to do, break the contract and covenant?
A29958B: How do you call him against whom the sentence is past, from that act of judgment?
A29958B: How do you call him for this deed?
A29958B: How do you say he hath done, who makes use of his neighbours wise, as him own?
A29958B: How shall we call him?
A29958B: In unfolding then these questions what shal the King do?
A29958B: Is there not a just and Lawfull war wich an enemy for grievous and intolerable injuries?
A29958B: Now if a King do those things which are directly for the dissolution of society, for the continuance where of he was created, how do we call him?
A29958B: Now seeing both the one and the other do these things, do you think that besides the law, either of them makes his own law?
A29958B: Take heed then: when any man doth secretly take away another mans goods, what do we say he hath done?
A29958B: What heads do you mean?
A29958B: What if a King be guilty of parricide, hath he the name of a King, and what ever doth belong to a judge?
A29958B: What shall we say ● hen which they set before them, who made ● ● wes?
A29958B: What the voice of the Clerk, and Herauld is, when the Law is published?
A29958B: What war is that which is carried on with him who is the enemy of all mankind, that is, a Tyrant?
A29958B: Wherefore?
A29958B: Whom do you think fittest to performe this duty?
A29958B: Why then do we so much weary our selves concerning a judge, seeing we have the Kings own confession, that is to say, the Law?
A29958B: why not?
A29958Before them over whom he hath the supream power to judge?
A29958But Magistracy is terrible, but to whom?
A29958But before what judges will you command a King to compear?
A29958But if nothing done without some example doth please: how many Civil statutes shall we have continued with us?
A29958But to our purpose, what difference is there betwixt the exclusion out of Christian fellowship, and the interdiction from fire and water?
A29958But what Princes doth he recommend to our prayers?
A29958But what else do Lawes act or desire, but that these monsters be obedient to right reason?
A29958But what if none such as we have spoken of, should be found in the City?
A29958But whether do you think the vagrant and solitary life, or the associations of men civilly incorporat, most agreable to nature?
A29958But why do I collect the assent of some single persons, since I can produce the testimony almost of the whole world?
A29958But why do we seek a more certain witness what Tyrants do deserve, than their own Conscience?
A29958But would there be no need of Kings, if there were no socities of men?
A29958But you will say to me, what need have I then to be subject to Magistracy, if I be the Lords freeman?
A29958But, do you think that utility was the first and main cause of the association of men?
A29958Can he then be called a father, who accounts his Subjects slaves?
A29958Can you ask of God a greater benefit than this so much for the good of mans concernes?
A29958Can you give me a reason why you think so?
A29958Do I now seeme to speak basely and contemptuously of a King?
A29958Do not the Civil Lawes seem to be certain Precepts of Royal Art?
A29958Do they not conflict with the same evils as well as the King?
A29958Do we trouble their Councills?
A29958Do yo think, that Physicians can so exactly have skill of all diseases, and of their remedies, as nothing more can be required for their cure?
A29958Do you not remember upon any of the Roman Emperours blood who was more cruell and wicked than C. Caligula?
A29958Do you not then perceive how easily the People may be pacified?
A29958Do you not think that this might come to pass, as in many other cases?
A29958Do you reprehend the Law it self?
A29958Do you think there is any Art of Reigning or not?
A29958Do you think, that those Tyrants before mentioned of all men the most cruell, are meant by the Apostle?
A29958First, they ask a King, but what a King?
A29958Follow me thus; is not a bridle made for the horse sake?
A29958For he that shall kill a good King, or at least none of the worst, may he not pretend by his wicked deed some shew of honest and Lawfull duty?
A29958For what can be left to those that are made slaves, but to be punished for other mens folly?
A29958For what can be more usefull for keeping peace with our nearest neighbours, than the moderation of Kings?
A29958For with a foolish Prince that of the Poet would prevaile whom doth false honour help, or lying infamy terrify, but a lewd man and a lyar?
A29958For, if they do so much detest the atrociousness of the first crime, how can they rationally reprehend severity in revenging it?
A29958From whence collect you that?
A29958Have we not called the Precepts of Artists in their several Arts, Lawes?
A29958Have you not some representation of a King and of a Tyrant impressed in your mind?
A29958He that still hath such examples set before his eyes, what a torture do you imagine he carryeth about in his breast?
A29958Hovv often hath the publick utility setled the private grudges?
A29958Hovv often in our time have great armies stood in opposition to one another?
A29958How can I, unless you tell me?
A29958How do we call him that judgeth?
A29958How then shall we call him who performeth these things in a Civil Body?
A29958I bid you look well to it round about, how many ruines, and how great slaughters will you see therein?
A29958I could freely give them an answer: what is that to them?
A29958I say of an herauld and of a clerk?
A29958Imagine then that some one in Parliament of the free people did freely ask the King, what if to any King should succeed a Son that is a fool, or mad?
A29958In the mean time, that we may reason together concerning the Law, tell me, doth he seeme to respect the good of a mad man, who looseth his bonds?
A29958Is it the cause?
A29958Is not the voice of both one and the same?
A29958Is not the voice of the people and the Law the same?
A29958M. Do you tell me that in good earnest?
A29958M. Do you think that any King will be so impudent, that he will not at all have any regard of the fame and opinion that all men have of him?
A29958M. Have you no more to say of a King?
A29958M. What custome do you speak of?
A29958M. What did he of that kind?
A29958M. What is that to the purpose in hand?
A29958M. What is that, I pray?
A29958M. What is that?
A29958M. What other, except that which is recorded?
A29958M. What way?
A29958M. Where do you tell these things were done?
A29958M. Which, I pray?
A29958M. Which?
A29958M. Why not?
A29958M. Why shall we think that that power would be unprofitable?
A29958M. Why?
A29958M. You think then that no Orator or Lawyer, who might congregat dispersed men ▪ hath been the Author of humane society, but God only?
A29958M: How so?
A29958M: How so?
A29958M: How?
A29958M: In what case?
A29958M: Shall I be ingenuous with you?
A29958M: What am I hearing?
A29958M: What way?
A29958M: What ● oth herein especially offend you?
A29958M: Yes, but what produce you against me to hinder me from the belief thereof?
A29958M: You will then grant this liberty to the people?
A29958May it please you then that we recollect briefly what hath been said?
A29958May it please you, that I set before you a manifest representation hereof?
A29958Now from what villany will any dignity or Majesty deterre those, who thus rage against Kings?
A29958Now though we grant this to be very true, what have we gaine ● by this conclusion?
A29958Now what was his most nefarious villany think you?
A29958Of what Precepts shall it consist?
A29958Ought not the Politik physician to do the same in this case, for freeing the whole common wealth of evill manners?
A29958Seing therefore it is not lawfull to loose Kings from the bonds of lawes, who shal then be the lawgiver?
A29958Set a golden grain of barley before him, and made him Consul?
A29958The King from the Law, or the Law from the King?
A29958The Law is, A Bishop must be the husband of one wife, than which Law what is more clear,& what may be said more plain?
A29958The representation then of both being laid out, do you not think that the people will understand also, what their duty is towards both?
A29958Then by the like animadversion may not some Art of Reigning be described, as wel as the Art of Physick?
A29958To which of the two do ● ou think was that contention most pernici ● ● s, to the people or to the Princes?
A29958Tyrants and yet lawfull?
A29958What Subjec ● hath ever approved the slaughter of one affec ● ting Tyranny?
A29958What acclamation, or what triumph can be compared with this daily Pomp?
A29958What did men especially regard in creating a King?
A29958What do they then ask?
A29958What do you think here worthy of reprehension?
A29958What do you think of that, that having called upon his horse, he invited him to sup with him?
A29958What do you think of this representation of a King?
A29958What do you think was the chief cause thereof?
A29958What doth therefore the Pope devise for excuse?
A29958What else, I ask you, would he advise them, than what Paul did advise the Church that then was at Rome, or what Jeremy advised the exiles in Assyria?
A29958What if he have no skill therein?
A29958What if some greater power be found which hath that right priviledge or jurisdiction over Kings, which Kings have over others?
A29958What if we shall admitt some acute man, yet not endowed with notable skill, for curing diseases?
A29958What if we shall find it out by comparing it with other Arts?
A29958What if we shall lay it over on the King?
A29958What is that?
A29958What is then that Governing Faculty of Cities, which we shall call Civil Art or Science?
A29958What maketh Artists in other Arts?
A29958What of Sherifs?
A29958What other cause may we imagine, than that at that time there were no Kings or Magistrats in the Church to whom he might write?
A29958What other names shall I collect, which we translate to denote the function of a King?
A29958What say you of Majors or Provosts in Towns?
A29958What say you of the governing Art?
A29958What say you of those, who would never once enter within these hedges?
A29958What shall we say they had a respect unto, who first made lawes?
A29958What then doth Paul write?
A29958What therefore 〈 ◊ 〉 with very great care observed in the parts would they be negligent of for the security and safety of all?
A29958What think you of that, how he made the same horse his colleague in the Priesthood?
A29958What think you shall then be done?
A29958What will these Counsellours given by the people do?
A29958What ● aith the law to these excuses?
A29958What?
A29958What?
A29958What?
A29958Which of the two hath the authority from the other?
A29958Which of the two is most powerfull, the people or the Law?
A29958Which of the two seeme greatest?
A29958Who then are to be accounted the right subjects?
A29958Whom shall we give him as a Pedagogue?
A29958Why do you think so?
A29958Why so, I pray you?
A29958Why, I pray you?
A29958Why?
A29958Will it please you then that we propose some idea of a Tyrant also, such as we gave in speaking of a King?
A29958Will you have me to shew you this by a famous example?
A29958Will you set such over us to rule us, who can not rule or governe themselves?
A29958Will you then be content that we more accuratly examine what we have last set down in comparing Arts one with another?
A29958You will not have a King loosed from lawes, why?
A29958a Lawfull King?
A29958a horse, for what use is he desired?
A29958and bind him fast loaded with the fetters of Lawes within a goale, as you did lately say?
A29958and whilst they do not obey reason, may not Lawes by the bonds of their sanctions restrain them?
A29958and why are they now offended at us, seeing we make no new Law, but continue to observe what we had by an ancient priviledge?
A29958are not our Lawes and statutes usefull not only to our selves, but also to our neighbours?
A29958do you think it Lawfull that Kings be exempted of, or not lyable to the Lawes?
A29958doth he hold them for private persons?
A29958doth not Paul command us to be subject to them?
A29958far less revenge it?
A29958for who shall call to a ● account a King become a Tyrant?
A29958hovv oft have they retired and vvithdravvn from one another, not only vvithout vvound, but vvithout any harme, yea vvithout so much as a reproach?
A29958hovv often hath the rumor of the enemies approach extinguished our intestine hatred and animosity?
A29958how many Lawes?
A29958or a Pilot, who doth alwayes study to make shipwrack of the goods in his ship, and who( as they say) makes a leck in the very ship wherein he sailes?
A29958or a Shepherd, who doth not feed his flock, but devoureth them?
A29958or in what business do we molest them?
A29958or is it the Law it self which you reprehended?
A29958or that they were so struck with fear, or seduced by flatteries, as to give themselves over into slavery willingly?
A29958or what place for mercy will they leave, whom neither the weakness of sexe, nor innocency of age will restrain?
A29958shall he pass from his land, because he can not set a judge over the King?
A29958shall we presently account him a Physician, as soon as he is chosen by all?
A29958to the good, or bad?
A29958what do you suppose would he have done with a Tyrant robbing the good of his Subjects and shedding their blood What hath our men done?
A29958what of Generals of Armies?
A29958who leadeth his subjects into manifest snares?
A29958why is it sought for?
A29958will you not think that he is a lawfull King?
A29958● If then a King break all the bonds of Lawes and plainly behave himself as a public enemy, what think you should be done this case?
A58510''T is Prodigious that such contradictory Mediums should be urged for countenanceing a thing to which they are so much repugnant?
A58510''T is too much to be Senseless too; Consider but upon this Occasion; a Case your self have* Cited,''t is that of the Lady Jane?
A58510* He tells us, when a matter is moved in Parliament by the King, the Commons consent last, and are therefore the Commons Co- ordinate with their King?
A58510And Charles the First, in the Case of Ship Money; can now the most virulent Democraticks hug such a piece without Horrour at its Inhumanity?
A58510And does Mr. Hunt say this desire of the People too, did mighty well to prevail( as it always ought) upon the King?
A58510And have we not Laws sufficient in force, and that for the keeping out allthe powers of the Pope, tho His Pilgrims landed here with a Legion?
A58510And here then, With what face can the Faction justify such a Barbarous Rebellion, or accuse their King for the beginning of the War?
A58510And if as in another place he has prov''d, there was much the greater part that remain''d Christian; where was this General Apostacy to the Pagan?
A58510And is it dangerous now to be kept from being damn''d or running to the Devil?
A58510And must a Parliament, be now the Manager of the mildest Monarch?
A58510And shall not an actual discent of the Crown take away the same defects?
A58510And shall not for the same the resolution of all the Judges suffice?
A58510And shall our 〈 ◊ 〉 ones Associate for the Destruction of the mildest Monarch, whose greatest Care is their Protection?
A58510And shall the Speech of some Noble Peer be better assurance, promise more, than the word of a King?
A58510And the Conclusion is, because none can say therefore, those two do not go to the making that number, and what then?
A58510And the most Flagitious Villains concern''d in it no way Criminal, can such a Senate sit till it has Murder''d a King?
A58510And then tell me whether without Irreligion, Innovation, or Rebellion, by which it once was, it can be once again abolisht?
A58510And then what must be meant by this Divine Right?
A58510And therefore must we have another Natural, and Illegitimate Duke to wear the Crown of England?
A58510And was it not in his Reign, That a Zealous* Papist said, It was the Parliaments Power to make a King or deprive him?
A58510And was that too, meant by St. Peter, when in the very next Line, he calls the King Supream?
A58510And what is that?
A58510And where then?
A58510But assoon as the Rebel House, had made their Ordinance for the Seizing it, which of those Miscreants did not think it as much Law?
A58510But can ever a more Senseless Inference be made, by a pretender to Sense, or a more Jesuitical Evasion by the most dexterous Manager of an Oath?
A58510But how has Time and Truth convinced the World that his Assertion is plain lye?
A58510But in short; the danger was then a Successor, and nothing could serve less than a new Law: And what was that?
A58510But our History tells us, Oliver call''d it, and what for?
A58510But what can not Malice suggest, or Faction invent?
A58510Could not their King Impeach a Commoner?
A58510Did not his 25th on default of Male?
A58510Did not that begin with an Impeachment against the Duke of Bucks, and these with the Banishment of a nearer Duke?
A58510Did not their best of* Queens, receive her Crown with a Recognition of it''s Descent to be by the Laws of God?
A58510Did not they debate it even now in Parliament, where such a thing was never questioned, but when the Order it self was brought into Question?
A58510Did not they declare it to be grounded upon the Laws of God and Nature, and the Customs of the Realm?
A58510Did not* they declare him their Lawful King by Inheritance, tho they knew they made him Inherit against all Law?
A58510Did the Seminary Priest suffer here, for Officiating, before that Statute was in being?
A58510Did they not declare the King seduced by Evil Councellors, and impeached several of the Seducers?
A58510Did they not even to a Tyrant, a Murderer, one fit only to be the Peoples Creature, whom no Nature or God did design for the Throne?
A58510Did they not make particular Provision in* Parliament, for the preservation of His Person, that was the very Merderer and Destroyer of His Subjects?
A58510Did they not resolve his Right to be both by God and Nature?
A58510Does he not for this tell us, That no* Civil Establishment, but is controlable to the publick Weal: ‖ That the Crown is the Peoples Right?
A58510Does not Mr. Hobbs teach us our Original State?
A58510Entail the Crown on the Lady Elizabeth, and made Mary Spurious?
A58510First I would ask him what he thinks was the Design of its first Imposition?
A58510Had it not left a less Blot in our English Chronicle as well as upon the Nation less Blood?
A58510Had not Leighton Libell''d both King and Bishops long before?
A58510Had those Sects of Seditious Rebels that ruined the best of Kings, and that only by debasing this his Right, and setting up their own for Divine?
A58510Have we not Oaths, Tests, two several Acts of Parliaments against Priest, proselytes and Recusants?
A58510Have we not the best Bulwark the Bishops and the greatest assurance, the word of a King?
A58510How can our Seditious Souls think themselves hardly dealt with, in those late Loyal Animadversions that have been made upon their lewd Libels?
A58510How tender and fond are the most stupid Animals?
A58510I consess the good excluded Members, and the bubbl''d Presbyterian Senate would not allow it for a Parliamentaty Process; and why?
A58510If they were really Persecuted and Opprest, how came they to be so powerful, as to make such a signal resistance?
A58510In the first of ‖ Edward did they not declare that their Soveraigns Title to the Crown was by Gods Law, and the Law of Nature?
A58510Is not the dust of such a Damnable Democratick, enough to pollute the Land wherein it lies?
A58510Is such a fellow fit to breath under a mild Government, that calls for Blood, where there is so much Mercy?
A58510Is this the way to have them Convencd to make them formidable?
A58510Lastly, did not the whole House take the Covenant at St. Margarets, and the Major part to have subscribed an Association now?
A58510Lastly, who impowers them to consent to a Bill; those that supplicate his Majesty would be pleased to enact, or his Majesty that says, Be it enacted?
A58510May we not as well Murder one that would be the Successor, and then plead our Innocence, we did not suffer him to Succeed?
A58510Or does that only signifie, the Candid Custom of the Proceedings in Parliament?
A58510Popery was once in England by Law Establish''t, and must it therefore again be Establish''t by Law?
A58510Prethee for thy senses sake, who levy''d War first?
A58510The Papists proudly tell us, their Religion was long before Luther, and must we not now profess our Protestant Religion?
A58510The first that feels the reforming stroke of their Fury, we find to be the Kings Privy Council; and what is that?
A58510The position of our Lawds and the Principle of our Prelate?
A58510Thompson and several of our Clergy, now brought on their Knees?
A58510Was it to perpetuate or acknowledge an Hereditary Succession, or to warrant an Exclusion of the Right Heirs?
A58510Was not Manwaring and Montague censured in the House?
A58510Was not the House of Peers Voted useless, and now Betrayers of the Liberty of the Subject?
A58510Was not the Militia aimed at now, and taken away then?
A58510Was not the Paper of Vnion about the same time to be presented to the Parliament, just such another piece as Pennington''s Petition?
A58510Was not the good old Queen brought into the Conspiracy?
A58510Was not the late King by that accused of Arbitrary Power, and Popery?
A58510Was not this very Text, actually turn''d up for the Supream Authority of the Parliament of England?
A58510Was there ever a more full acknowledgment of Power and Prerogative, than was made to King † James upon his first coming to the Crown?
A58510Was there not a Councill of Six, whom the good old King impeached for bringing in the Scots?
A58510Was there not an actual Plot of Papists discovered only from finding some Letters of a poor Priest in Clerkenwell?
A58510We have seen several Subjects against all Reason ruin''d with an Act of Parliament; and therefore shall we think it alway to do Right?
A58510We must Discourse of Government in general; and for the Original of it, the Gentleman is resolv''d to doubt: And why?
A58510Were not Articles drawn against Scroggs, and some of the rest declared Arbitrary?
A58510Were not several of the Council now impeached, and declared Seducers of the King?
A58510Were not the Ecclesiastical Courts then to be Corrected, and that now taken into Examination?
A58510Were not the Judges then impeacht, and Jenkins clapt in the Tower?
A58510Were not the Spiritual Lords excluded from their Right in Temporals?
A58510What pray better can be expected, when the Optimacy is made up of so many more?
A58510Where do we find the worst of Fools, designedly to destroy their Patrimony, though many times through Ignorance, they may waste them?
A58510Where is this mighty* Mischief that will ensue upon this Opinion?
A58510Why do n''t they tell us too our present Soveraign invaded first the Rebels in Scotland, and those that 〈 ◊ 〉 at Lime?
A58510Why so senseless too?
A58510Why were they not so fair as to cite the 〈 ◊ 〉 out of Filmer; wherein these puzzel''d Senseless positions were asserted?
A58510Will a Nice point of this his Law resolve does he think as tender a Case of Conscience?
A58510Would they have given their God the Lye, and made Transgression where there was no Law?
A58510Would you have your Gentlemen of the Shop and Yard take their Measures of the State too?
A58510Would you perswade the World your purses are so 〈 ◊ 〉, so free too, that you long for a Subsidy to fill up the Kings?
A58510and all this even against God''s Vicegerent?
A58510and almost by their Parliament it self declared so in every Reign, was it ever taken out, but when they took away the Life of their King too?
A58510and can the retrieving the Memory of those immediate Forrunners of our first Misfortunes be made a Crime?
A58510and did they not now again dispute the Bishop''s Right?
A58510and have we not had Six of the Senators that have suffered or fled Justice for the same Conspiracy?
A58510and have we not had a notable one now, as deep as Hell, that none but Heaven can sound the bottom?
A58510and is their judging now in Capitals a Crime?
A58510and last of all, Did not the Junto at Westminster pass an Act for the King''s Tryal, and sign a Warrant for his Execution?
A58510and must our most gracious one stand the mark of Malice, and Reproach, and that only for desending that of his Brothers?
A58510and shall not an experienc''d King secure himself from such a Seditious Senate?
A58510and shall the Press be pestered under our undoubted Soveraign, and the mildest Prince, to make him Co- ordinate with the People?
A58510and that of such a Villanous Viper, to whom the Old Serpent, the Devil himself would be an Antidote?
A58510and think him dangerous if not governed, by themselves?
A58510and was not Her present Majesty sworn into this?
A58510and was not this the Sense of † all the Judges and Serjeants of the time, to whose Opinion it was submitted?
A58510and were not both these Accusations level''d at our present in several* Votes?
A58510and what does Hunt''s Harangue tend to, but to maintain all the very same Position of this Peoples judicial Power?
A58510and will the Light of this illuminated Lawyer, resolve us Sacrilege to be a lesser Sin than single Felony?
A58510and will the protection of their House extend to an Inditement for High- Treason, as well as an Execution upon Debt?
A58510are things the sooner to be violated, only because they are the more sacred?
A58510can he Prescribe with the Laws of the Land to impunity from the Decalogue; and tell the Almighty some Killing is no Murder?
A58510can they here defend iusinuated Treason, when Stanley dyed for a more Innocent Innuendo?
A58510can they not apprehend a Father to have any paternal Authority over his Family, unless he be able to Murder every Man of it?
A58510can those that come to give their consent for the making Laws, be thus Ignorant of those that are already made?
A58510does not himself know we have nothing of an Allodium here, as some Contend they have in Normandy and France?
A58510had it not saved the Blood, perhaps of all the mighty Book of Martyrs?
A58510had the sturdy Prince rejected this as he did many other general Desires?
A58510has not the Military power, for above this 500 years been absolutely in the Crown?
A58510how do they most affectionately express that paternal Love for the Preservation of their little Young?
A58510how much Blood it has cost us already?
A58510in which was your Rome most bless''d, or suffer''d least, with the bloody War between Caesar and Pompey, or the settlement of it in Julius himself?
A58510into what form?
A58510no sign of a Protestant Plot?
A58510of that excess of Soveraignty?
A58510or are either of them therefore the Judges in their own Case?
A58510or can any Hand long sway the Scepter, when it wants the Protection of the Sword?
A58510or did they then reserve to themselves a power of declaring who should be his Successors by Law?
A58510or the Constitution of a Parliament, that first within this four hundred years could be said to have a Being?
A58510or were the Parliament the Traytors that made him to withdraw?
A58510p. 239. why may we not begin by removing all his Majesties present Council by Parliament?
A58510reinstated them both again, and that both in Birth and Tail?
A58510shall here be thought the bare opinion of a Parliament sufficient to clear a Corrupted Blood?
A58510shall not your Soveraigns sacred Person be preserved by that Power and Authority derived even from the 〈 ◊ 〉?
A58510that could call their Julian, Goats beard, Bull- burner, Impious; Apostate, and Atheist?
A58510the Cheats, the Hypocrites of those Barbarous Times, whose blessed, and most Monumental Labours, can make the most Civil ones now to Blush?
A58510the very first Leaf and Line, and wo n''t they believe their own Oracle?
A58510this Venome?
A58510this thy Religion?
A58510time, that it was so Resolved, even to the nulling three several Acts, that put Pardons out of the Princes power?
A58510to whom, shall we run for the best maintaining of this popular Darling?
A58510was ever his Head protected from Violence, when this, the Guard of his Crown, was gone?
A58510was it only to extend to the Beast of the Field, and Fowls of the Air, and every Living thing that then moved upon the Face of the Earth?
A58510was not the Militia offer''d at in some of their Votes?
A58510was that of War?
A58510was the withdrawing of the King, Treason to his Parliament?
A58510was there not a Triennial one first Insolently demanded, and as Graciously consented to?
A58510what was the Reason of Inserting, including the Kings Heirs and Successors in those Oaths of SVPREMACY and ALLEGIANCE?
A58510where, when, and by whom were the first provocations given to discontent, and who were the first Agressors in a barbarous and a bloody Civil War?
A58510who Reigned more Arbitrary, and managed all Affairs more Monstrously, than this very Monster of Mankind?
A58510who is it that fills their Chair, those that present him; or the King, that accepts or disapproves whom they have presented?
A58510who is it that gives them access to his Person; the Commons that desire it, or he from whom''t is desir''d?
A58510why did not Mr. 〈 ◊ 〉 or the 〈 ◊ 〉 their subscription too?
A58510why does he not prove it a president for Polygamy, and Murder; because that furious Prince still sacrificed Women to his Lust, and Men to his Anger?
A58510why must the Press be pester''d with three or four Volums for the purpose?
A58510why must this Bugbear of Arbitrary, this Monster of Absoluteness, and* Bloody War, be the Consequences of this Doctrine of Peace?
A58510why must we therefore make out too, that he kept up his Majesty after the manner of our Kings?
A58510why so much of the Commons Antiquity Asserred?
A58510would those that promoted the spilling of the Blood of the two Nephews, stick to Resolve that of the rest attainted?