trigram

This is a table of type trigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

trigram frequency
the principle of141
it would be119
it is not116
that it is89
the theory of88
that of the87
on the other86
one of the82
the other hand80
it is necessary78
the laws of77
is to say75
in the same74
on the contrary74
can not be73
that is to73
it will be71
we can not71
it is the65
this is not63
at the same63
at the instant63
and it is62
there is no61
of the earth60
so to speak60
the notion of59
i do not58
the law of58
the same time58
is necessary to58
but it is57
the motion of54
we do not54
the action of53
is not the53
it is true51
of the same49
be regarded as49
to the same49
the velocity of47
the number of47
it is because47
it is a46
be necessary to46
the milky way44
point of view44
and this is44
it may be43
of the two43
more or less42
would be necessary42
what is the42
i have just42
would not be42
of the first42
this is what41
of the second41
this is the41
a and b40
this is a40
motion of the40
will not be40
no longer be39
a sort of39
it is clear39
to the other39
the study of38
to say that38
but this is38
is only a38
the same point37
if it were37
that we have37
we have just37
and that the36
i have said36
we have seen36
is no longer36
this is why36
the properties of35
the existence of35
of which we35
there is a34
we know that34
it is only34
is the same34
be able to34
the conservation of33
according to the33
equal to the33
a series of32
as well as32
that they are32
to one another32
great number of32
in the first32
they are not32
the history of32
so that the32
principle of the31
a question of31
the point of31
one of these31
do not know31
those of the31
the right to31
the nature of31
conservation of energy31
that there is30
the probability of30
of the universe30
which is the30
the principles of30
will be the30
it does not30
and that of29
of all the29
part of the29
there would be29
in other words29
is not all29
represent to ourselves29
of muscular sensations29
of the ether29
as i have29
the aid of28
is not a28
velocity of the28
point of the28
because it is28
more and more28
by the same27
of the body27
with regard to27
the same way27
we should have27
we shall have27
of the conservation27
we shall see26
proportional to the26
due to the26
if it is26
the equality of26
it has been26
as we have26
the object a26
say that the26
is clear that26
or at least26
is equal to26
in a word26
parts of the26
on the one25
the hypothesis of25
could not be25
be said that25
action and reaction25
the straight line25
so far as25
the physical continuum25
the name of25
which we have25
the definition of25
would have been25
and of the25
of the other25
it must be25
the aggregate of24
in such a24
an infinity of24
not the same24
of the principle24
principle of relativity24
calculus of probabilities24
at a distance24
of the retina24
the calculus of24
the work of24
velocity of light24
the rules of24
the case of24
i wish to24
which i have24
point of space24
the state of24
of mathematical physics23
can only be23
theory of gases23
the one hand23
the instant alpha23
the instant beta23
of which i23
it is to23
because they are23
same point of23
properly so called23
of these two23
position of the23
a great number23
it would not23
the center of22
is easy to22
would no longer22
the sense of22
we say that22
we have the22
would be to22
study of the22
is a question22
we have not22
suppose that the22
the movements of22
in order to22
not at all21
of least action21
to that of21
it will not21
that it has21
enable us to21
it is easy21
the end of21
is true of21
state of the21
would have to21
that we can21
it is that21
sense of the21
in the case21
only on the21
to which we21
back to the21
of the equality21
to make the21
the same as21
and if the21
the mathematical continuum20
of action and20
the object b20
of which the20
each of these20
it can not20
the form of20
with reference to20
with the same20
square root of20
what we have20
and in fact20
when it is20
a multitude of20
of the most20
of three dimensions20
in place of20
the same for20
which i shall20
in the second20
the kinetic theory20
it is impossible20
is that of20
would not have19
the same in19
it is which19
not to be19
to show that19
been able to19
the position of19
that we are19
this it is19
the other day19
the beginning of19
the negative electrons19
than that of19
the probability that19
that there are19
enables us to19
the possibility of19
the series sigma19
theory of lorentz19
it is in19
for us to19
of the mathematical19
in conformity with19
we have said19
at the beginning19
in this way19
it would have18
at the end18
by means of18
a point of18
has three dimensions18
i can not18
in which the18
in a certain18
kinetic theory of18
so as to18
have just said18
they do not18
of the world18
we should not18
a certain number18
of the science18
the fact that18
equality of action18
which it is18
be the same18
that it would18
a system of18
to suppose that18
we could not18
we have no18
we wish to18
and we can18
i shall call18
the cathode rays17
the second order17
the value of17
we are not17
an even number17
in the rough17
such and such17
work of the17
that this is17
the direction of17
one to the17
the sum of17
rotation of the17
what i have17
notion of space17
of the straight17
that may be17
the result of17
the physical sciences17
that is not17
i have not17
and in the17
when i say17
that i have17
of the stars17
i know not17
first of all17
it is this17
each of them17
that the first17
of the milky17
i say that17
the instant t17
seems to me17
the same thing16
the ratio of16
at the point16
finite number of16
action of the16
it may happen16
the scientific fact16
the acceleration of16
and the other16
of the physical16
the science of16
certain number of16
we see that16
the part of16
to make a16
will be said16
the enunciation of16
they would have16
would be no16
know how to16
i shall not16
in its turn16
if we had16
none the less16
to which the16
is only the16
of the bodies16
a physical continuum16
us that the16
the positive electrons16
it is evident16
but that is16
center of gravity16
a finite number16
it is proper16
series of muscular16
that all the16
of the system16
according to which16
to represent to16
which can be16
this would be16
for all the16
that would be16
and we have16
principle of least15
it seems to15
the rotation of15
that of light15
the same sense15
is that the15
would be a15
of a closed15
we try to15
root of two15
to the action15
is due to15
the parameters q15
we are led15
with the velocity15
the idea of15
but there is15
the results of15
which would be15
nature of the15
and then the15
in contact with15
and that is15
between the two15
be led to15
as in the15
in the sense15
is impossible to15
physical continuum of15
is to be15
the square of15
the origin of15
principle of induction15
which we can15
a closed current15
the language of15
by the aid15
of complete induction15
an open current15
alpha and beta15
and we shall15
the square root15
of the elements14
i have spoken14
action of a14
in so far14
as that of14
is not to14
it is needful14
the relations of14
that the same14
have said above14
each of the14
know not what14
reference to the14
it is by14
of the word14
of the series14
is one of14
the logic of14
a at the14
the n th14
the coordinates of14
the importance of14
it is therefore14
and if we14
of the laws14
definition of the14
is proper to14
as to the14
and the second14
and so on14
to all the14
whatever be the14
of the number14
in the preceding14
the influence of14
this is an14
we shall say14
what is called14
is true that14
as it is14
since it would14
of central forces14
of the motion14
applied to the14
see that the14
the course of14
so it is14
seem to us14
in accordance with14
appear to us14
we shall be14
the elements of14
have to be14
the sensation of14
which we are14
the relation of14
to the point14
the presence of14
be replaced by14
of the law14
at the moment14
among all the14
this is only13
to those of13
is proportional to13
they may be13
is not enough13
this point of13
should not be13
the development of13
is what we13
if they are13
of a certain13
is not so13
is evident that13
with respect to13
have the right13
the totality of13
but we have13
direction of the13
no means of13
principle of inertia13
let us see13
the progress of13
whether it is13
the whole number13
of our senses13
of the mind13
idea of the13
he does not13
a part of13
the same laws13
in virtue of13
of the velocity13
we should be13
there is something13
the motions of13
in any case13
of the molecules13
we no longer13
is true for13
the human mind13
not only the13
conclude that the13
so that we13
to conclude that13
that in the13
may happen that13
that at the13
the phenomena of13
to know the13
we have been13
and that this13
the unity of13
to the general13
laws of the13
there is an13
and to the13
to the mind13
which we shall13
would be the13
that we must13
this is because13
to the first13
nothing in common13
for its own13
the effect of13
such a way13
and at the13
under these conditions13
they would be13
the order of13
will no longer13
to the theory13
however that may13
the equations of13
have the same12
we know the12
who do not12
at the center12
that we may12
fact in the12
and then we12
there is nothing12
of the sun12
of the theory12
when we say12
the first order12
space has three12
to speak of12
is necessary that12
sigma and sigma12
an element of12
to us as12
they will be12
those which are12
are no longer12
is at the12
aid of the12
in this case12
that if the12
laws of nature12
because of the12
in which we12
being able to12
of our body12
there will be12
the earth turns12
regard to the12
that space has12
it is possible12
if we can12
infinite in number12
the series of12
one of those12
properties of the12
history of the12
of the object12
equations of the12
changes of position12
to our body12
far from it12
such is the12
of the mathematician12
teaches us that12
have just seen12
the radius of12
notion of the12
laws of chance12
have been able12
are those which12
ratio of the12
that can be12
existence of the12
it is just12
as if it12
as for the12
principle of complete12
have no means12
the muscular sensations12
movements of the12
can no longer12
it is very12
my first finger12
seems to us12
but that the12
in that of12
earth turns round12
it can be12
a to the12
to find the12
history of science12
and on the12
of the different11
to each other11
will be a11
all that is11
and yet it11
true of the11
that they have11
they have been11
that if we11
easy to see11
do you think11
of the whole11
common to all11
a straight line11
is only an11
value of the11
have just spoken11
function of the11
would seem to11
b at the11
or the other11
sum of the11
and i have11
that these two11
it is no11
will never be11
when we have11
will be true11
we find that11
a thousand times11
is not only11
are to be11
is the probability11
which has been11
because we have11
elements of the11
may be regarded11
cease to be11
the whole of11
we shall not11
all the others11
there can be11
have seen that11
is why i11
would suffice to11
just as well11
square of the11
relation to the11
the complexity of11
us to foresee11
a mechanical explanation11
is not true11
analogous to the11
and which are11
the point occupied11
motion of a11
of a great11
some of the11
space of three11
of four dimensions11
that which is11
i shall be11
in the other11
these two objects11
be content with11
the dimensions of11
the same name11
and that we11
are capable of11
and if it11
reasoning by recurrence11
in every direction11
place of the11
point occupied by11
blue and yellow11
yet it is11
at the outset11
that of a11
motions of the11
between a and11
no longer the11
in consequence of11
rule of action11
of the notion11
independent of the11
a very great11
confine myself to11
the foundations of11
the crude fact11
not be the11
in relation to11
of several dimensions11
theory of the11
that it will11
it might be11
is the only11
from one another11
the question is11
but it would11
but if we11
and that it11
would be impossible11
said that the11
this or that11
by a continuous11
what do we11
would be only11
principles of mechanics11
the genesis of11
they are the11
the most important11
to sum up11
been led to11
if there is10
of the question10
law of acceleration10
that is the10
the molecules of10
from the first10
are led to10
as soon as10
the solar system10
due to chance10
under the form10
its own sake10
a way that10
of the planets10
will always be10
know that the10
are very numerous10
would therefore be10
i suppose that10
shall say that10
from one point10
correspond to the10
corresponding to the10
the same meaning10
in the theory10
element of current10
but it will10
then it is10
the first of10
be true of10
of view of10
it seems that10
since it is10
have been made10
that does not10
it is difficult10
complexity of the10
continuum of several10
to determine the10
is less than10
of a body10
of mathematical reasoning10
one of them10
in the world10
have been led10
in what concerns10
to prove that10
to the motion10
and then it10
number of dimensions10
of such a10
the parts of10
we represent to10
to us to10
we think we10
say that a10
this is to10
of the spectrum10
is a constant10
if all the10
all the world10
associated with the10
than all the10
i have shown10
changes of state10
it is thus10
depend only on10
does not suffice10
to be able10
to the principle10
points of space10
side of the10
value of science10
of the new10
the minor planets10
is capable of10
is what is10
a branch of10
the cause of10
there is not10
the velocities of10
from one to10
relativity of space10
regard them as10
the measurement of10
t and u10
place in the10
will suffice to10
as if the10
but there are10
which would have10
of great numbers10
we can make10
why do we10
out of the10
to be made10
have not the10
which will be10
that the two10
the image of10
to the ether10
law of the10
capable of being10
be equal to10
the domain of10
it is probable10
be reduced to10
conformity with the10
up to the10
the mind of9
has no meaning9
in a sense9
does not mean9
not hesitate to9
and we are9
would only be9
means that the9
science and hypothesis9
of relative motion9
implies no contradiction9
it can only9
the facts of9
and that they9
same for all9
we have only9
and in particular9
odd over even9
the discovery of9
if they were9
the use of9
enunciation of the9
to give the9
the choice of9
the characteristics of9
itself to the9
and i shall9
as far as9
with that of9
differences in the9
may always be9
all the other9
the fact in9
of the center9
must be made9
depend on the9
mathematical continuum of9
always the same9
they are very9
i know that9
from a certain9
the same relative9
the eclipse happened9
order of the9
a relation between9
theorem is true9
between these two9
the impression a9
it from the9
saying that the9
of energy and9
it could not9
it is said9
a function of9
that such a9
and such a9
a certain measure9
of the movements9
is it not9
of one of9
speak of the9
would have no9
regarded as the9
different parts of9
to the second9
the details of9
of the problem9
i should have9
a difference of9
to be a9
to us the9
points of view9
more than three9
of the principles9
a continuous function9
the points of9
to admit that9
in the ether9
will it be9
respect to the9
what does that9
there is one9
to account for9
i have already9
and consequently the9
that it may9
two parts of9
we must not9
of a very9
it was not9
the distribution of9
to affirm that9
the weight of9
be supposed that9
a little more9
of whole numbers9
and yet the9
two right angles9
have nothing in9
the intensity of9
from the point9
we have a9
i have explained9
if we do9
be tempted to9
thus it is9
one point to9
is enough to9
in regard to9
accompanied by the9
the real mass9
the effects of9
will then be9
for those who9
of a second9
and b are9
the same with9
have not been9
action of two9
to say the9
if there were9
two sorts of9
law of inertia9
we have to9
probability of causes9
they can not9
point to another9
the two points9
to give a9
the method of9
the first is9
at any instant9
the absolute velocity9
if the first9
to know what9
differential equations of9
not suffice to9
the belief in9
be capable of9
table of distribution9
to see that9
but we do9
can teach us9
could not have9
thanks to the9
question of the9
of each of9
the class of9
of the parameters9
the rest of9
as they are9
the point a9
from the particular9
be true for9
we seek to9
equality of two9
longer the same9
to a certain9
we may be9
do not believe9
of the distance9
a continuum of9
variations of the9
from this point9
revealed to us9
is because we9
the subliminal self9
of the instrument9
relations of the9
contact with the9
parallel to the8
the same muscular8
the first place8
of the calculus8
in a few8
represented by a8
very great number8
does not exist8
to distinguish the8
we shall find8
produced by the8
how do we8
gives us the8
the surface of8
but if it8
the vis viva8
the changes of8
is only one8
alpha beta gamma8
in the physical8
no longer a8
of the fact8
the body b8
one upon another8
are forced to8
relative position of8
be proportional to8
by muscular sensations8
the only one8
the series s8
to a given8
a certain time8
therefore it is8
the future of8
right to say8
us to be8
is the cause8
pass from the8
principle of relative8
in a single8
relation between the8
and the scientific8
be found in8
as those of8
a certain point8
the ether is8
to the law8
theory of lesage8
necessary for the8
accompanied by muscular8
analogous to those8
way that the8
is still more8
return to the8
at a glance8
is not an8
with those of8
the particular to8
shall be able8
you know that8
the same direction8
and by the8
necessary that the8
this does not8
is because the8
is the principle8
area of two8
that the scientist8
and we should8
we shall then8
the same displacement8
it is certain8
does that mean8
it enables us8
the relativity of8
movement of the8
with the principle8
which may be8
carried along in8
absolute velocity of8
may be called8
axis of the8
a rigid solid8
that all these8
this will be8
is not in8
i have the8
the relations between8
to the square8
this definition is8
between the instants8
and they have8
of a new8
to make it8
weight of grams8
the magnetic needle8
than three dimensions8
of the organism8
to the totality8
the difference of8
the world of8
that the principle8
do we not8
and can not8
no longer have8
the quantity of8
on the earth8
the various parts8
should be led8
can not give8
of the external8
they could not8
it is convenient8
but in the8
of the fixed8
particular to the8
we may say8
to compare the8
i did not8
to add that8
has taught us8
it not be8
to ourselves a8
which should be8
the rule of8
of science are8
if we could8
of a rigid8
and the same8
by saying that8
variation of the8
to obtain a8
same muscular sensations8
which must be8
same time the8
center of the8
carried along by8
should not have8
with which we8
that space is8
attract each other8
it should be8
distances of the8
and if i8
instants alpha and8
do is to8
are accompanied by8
affirm that the8
an experimental law8
we can represent8
that we could8
the two series8
to give it8
it is of8
of our own8
the inertia of8
of one dimension8
does this mean8
by the motion8
or in the8
change of position8
more than one8
the second case8
and he has8
what we call8
no need of8
the better to8
one or the8
of the continuum8
it is so8
little by little8
the mass of8
is because it8
an area of8
is indistinguishable from8
distribution of the8
principle of sufficient8
step by step8
b and c8
of the senses8
regarded as an8
true or false8
and that in8
the movable part8
a portion of8
the elementary phenomenon8
it is more8
the heavenly bodies8
case of the8
see in it8
and it will8
we can only8
is probable that8
of these bodies8
acceleration of a8
the relative position8
the continuum c8
same laws as8
is needful to8
to adopt the8
and yet we8
should have been8
the theories of8
but they are8
eclipse happened at8
direct intuition of8
the problems of8
is the first8
on the same8
do not wish8
two of these8
the facts which8
is not always8
they will not8
the finger d8
to understand the8
problem of the8
of sufficient reason8
a weight of8
the place of8
the first class8
errors of observation8
it is for8
that if it8
from that of8
for a moment7
rest of the7
the differential equations7
of the old7
of this body7
the conception of7
it is from7
which enable us7
in the ordinary7
it often happens7
can not represent7
of the thread7
of this kind7
to make them7
which we may7
would then be7
true of n7
it is then7
had not been7
the euclidean geometry7
in a straight7
the differences of7
difference between the7
we are able7
which have been7
in a way7
which is only7
is very great7
no one has7
to return to7
not have been7
to the object7
the moment when7
the parry b7
knowledge of the7
from time to7
present state of7
the earth is7
which is not7
when we know7
of the scientific7
that each of7
the most general7
discussion of the7
of gravity of7
is in the7
acceleration of the7
accessible to experiment7
of the force7
regard it as7
current of convection7
anterior to the7
of a particular7
to imagine a7
this is all7
to apply the7
only in the7
is able to7
an idea of7
the mathematical sciences7
what is a7
that the mean7
may be said7
that the action7
true for c7
these are the7
continuum of three7
that the object7
the consideration of7
depends upon the7
their mutual distances7
under the name7
an external change7
are the same7
relative to the7
the explanation of7
radius of the7
the fixed wire7
depends only on7
of which it7
of solid bodies7
series sigma and7
in proportion as7
they have not7
points of the7
not wish to7
of the star7
in the two7
go back to7
not the only7
on an element7
in the direction7
if the two7
the object of7
may be the7
these two points7
put in evidence7
do not see7
straight and uniform7
true for a7
mutual action of7
of the individual7
space of four7
is a point7
such are the7
reduced to a7
has long been7
is a problem7
of the general7
in this sense7
if i were7
by which the7
principle of contradiction7
to know how7
end of the7
represent to myself7
we have done7
and their mutual7
it to the7
make a choice7
form of a7
in one of7
of the various7
act as if7
to the time7
by which we7
i shall have7
is not at7
the philosophy of7
so great that7
but which is7
since we can7
to the number7
is always the7
that is impossible7
imposed upon us7
we need not7
act on the7
tell us that7
those which have7
as for us7
to seek to7
only by the7
what are the7
first of these7
to do so7
the different parts7
us to the7
it has not7
transmitted to me7
pass from one7
of the plane7
wave of acceleration7
but we shall7
so long as7
the translation of7
and which would7
have no meaning7
of the medium7
it is still7
arrive at the7
the first case7
us to see7
have spoken of7
a law of7
is to the7
i am not7
mind of the7
that it does7
just as the7
have sought to7
would it not7
operate at a7
that the law7
which are not7
the masses of7
in the initial7
in the most7
beginning of the7
is that which7
can represent to7
but we are7
of the head7
and above all7
distance from the7
but at the7
lead us to7
that we shall7
the doctrine of7
in all the7
that they were7
necessary to make7
have said that7
you know what7
mathematics and physics7
the first two7
laws of motion7
would appear to7
in geometric space7
is that it7
of analysis situs7
that is a7
formed of a7
would be easy7
two series of7
the internal changes7
if we should7
would still be7
in the new7
more complicated than7
current on a7
is a fact7
it in the7
there is only7
will therefore be7
no right to7
values of the7
to the laws7
what has been7
series of movements7
the values of7
totality of impressions7
suffice to determine7
is what i7
to see in7
where it is7
be deduced from7
how shall we7
the distance of7
can be divided7
be explained by7
of the electrons7
definition of force7
principles of dynamics7
say that it7
of all these7
the majority of7
the product of7
the second is7
all the possible7
the feeling of7
time to time7
surface of the7
we wished to7
all we can7
have nothing to7
which seem to7
have given us7
the same if7
compatible with the7
to the total7
the duration of7
be impossible to7
and we may7
it remains to7
even in the7
of two forces7
the variation of7
equations of lagrange7
shall have to7
the theorem is7
dimensions of the7
it is precisely7
what we are7
that we know7
to the sun7
we can always7
say that this7
be the case7
can it be7
to regard the7
of the cut7
but not always7
to me by7
to us in7
is a very7
a member of7
under the influence7
to be in7
we may suppose7
shall we say7
for it to7
positions of the7
the light of7
is identical with7
is difficult to7
it would seem7
the basis of7
it suffices to7
let us now7
know that this7
other than the7
to make this7
what concerns the7
what may be7
the methods of7
the probable value7
does not budge7
from the other7
course of the7
infinity of ways7
the intervention of7
but what is7
the problem of7
if you choose7
subject to the7
to calculate the7
of the square7
and those of7
even if it7
laws of mechanics7
at each instant7
state of things7
an experimental science7
that is true7
than in the7
which makes the7
consequence of the7
the point b7
to attribute to7
and which is7
the simplicity of7
is called the7
one can not7
the most convenient7
at the first7
that they will7
how many dimensions7
would never have7
of this same7
the means of7
numbers divided by7
the moment of7
the intuition of6
of science is6
first that the6
a whole number6
not only to6
shows us that6
i could not6
to the present6
that i am6
with the other6
the same relations6
i think i6
have just explained6
all the parts6
do not yet6
they would not6
with one another6
but we can6
the external world6
various parts of6
they have only6
the axis of6
only a single6
imposed upon our6
or of the6
it is on6
not give us6
which i attribute6
system of axes6
are free to6
we owe to6
indistinguishable from the6
for that it6
we shall never6
i shall say6
is that there6
to the body6
from the sun6
thanks to this6
there is another6
of the finger6
the reaction of6
is no absolute6
the second degree6
whatever may be6
is the study6
closed current on6
of the book6
judgment a priori6
the potential energy6
the body a6
milky way is6
needless to add6
let us pass6
the initial situation6
of the velocities6
of these elements6
the propagation of6
of his own6
in the study6
the introduction of6
it by a6
permits us to6
we can say6
science for its6
say that they6
end of a6
come to us6
on the point6
creation of the6
appeal to intuition6
the same effects6
look at the6
may say that6
we have made6
we pass from6
they are those6
be corrected by6
tenth of a6
the semicircular canals6
by a certain6
that it can6
us to reach6
the same order6
if it had6
for me to6
belongs to the6
part of a6
so that it6
duration of the6
by a series6
of ordinary geometry6
very far away6
belonging to the6
we have called6
of light is6
we conclude that6
said that this6
the other by6
this way of6
space is not6
us that it6
genesis of the6
occupied by a6
the result is6
that i do6
which correspond to6
which does not6
the british association6
i have been6
i could have6
of our sensations6
and their derivatives6
property of the6
the length of6
the same proportion6
a body is6
corresponding to a6
to be true6
is nothing but6
in reference to6
i have called6
the difference between6
it be said6
a few words6
no longer any6
of the minor6
member of the6
series s and6
the top number6
the reach of6
for the physicist6
of formal logic6
is true in6
less than two6
even over odd6
than two right6
is this not6
the consequences of6
one of our6
is that we6
depends on the6
translation of the6
the mutual action6
we are sure6
do not hesitate6
we see the6
should be regarded6
but it may6
that the point6
is not more6
of no use6
we are forced6
first to the6
mechanical explanation of6
result of a6
by a finite6
is no need6
those who are6
can be made6
we have thus6
on this account6
if we look6
at least in6
should have no6
be useful to6
more convenient to6
have seen the6
by a correlative6
by definition that6
hypothesis of lorentz6
theory of errors6
of this new6
from the center6
of the energy6
the sides of6
do not understand6
it with the6
but if the6
a magnetic pole6
enter into the6
true if the6
but to the6
only of the6
but on the6
for the same6
found in the6
the group of6
has already been6
no reason for6
mean that we6
the body c6
we should never6
in both cases6
from the general6
will be very6
corresponds to the6
in presence of6
can not know6
hypothesis of the6
not only that6
are transmitted to6
it is also6
not mean that6
but that it6
are incapable of6
and it would6
of the problems6
appears to us6
in accord with6
one from another6
can be no6
but as a6
the distances of6
which corresponds to6
far as it6
to find a6
since this is6
c will have6
and for that6
of the scientist6
unity of the6
to get out6
be no science6
the concept of6
muscular sensations s6
if it be6
that they would6
the wave of6
the initial instant6
it would no6
the other is6
which do not6
be better to6
to us a6
to be the6
as an experimental6
be the point6
a course of6
been made to6
if they do6
longer be the6
synthetic a priori6
to which i6
if then we6
distance of the6
could be made6
of the existence6
only two dimensions6
it has the6
the eyes of6
is at once6
the school of6
law of relativity6
it will always6
to have the6
invariably bound to6
may be replaced6
and which we6
because it would6
of the logic6
nature of mathematical6
the attention of6
just the same6
law of great6
move according to6
which seems to6
of the future6
is possible to6
the currents of6
would only have6
was necessary to6
terms of the6
branch of physics6
that not only6
from the preceding6
b of the6
presence of a6
of this sort6
the same sensation6
he would have6
sensations of the6
that the laws6
of them is6
of more than6
a very small6
formed by the6
the earth would6
they are in6
in studying the6
and of which6
animated by a6
law of gravitation6
the point where6
at the time6
led to distinguish6
investigation of the6
may be supposed6
two kinds of6
the magnetic force6
i mean the6
at first sight6
along in a6
the instants alpha6
tells us that6
inertia of the6
one after another6
is common to6
values of these6
to one of6
is none the6
indistinguishable from a6
the solution of6
of the sciences6
we should always6
shall confine myself6
supposed that the6
movements corresponding to6
the meaning of6
of the heavenly6
no way of6
nothing of the6
if you wish6
and this it6
get out of6
science would be6
the real world6
to say to6
same relative position6
each other in6
to the two6
true in the6
the most recent6
to take a6
if they have6
intensity of the6
the art of6
to ourselves the6
teach us the6
muscular sensations which6
it will suffice6
have tried to6
by so much6
a long time6
very different from6
it is always6
at the initial6
and yet this6
a theory of6
at least that6
all these phenomena6
the phenomenon of6
to us that6
he could not6
is two times6
definition by postulates6
if we were6
of the magnetic6
number of possible6
along by the6
the data of6
which might be6
for the other6
at the present6
that we should6
in the genesis6
and so we6
principles of geometry6
that they do6
of the function6
origin of the6
of the aggregate6
of light and6
any number of6
it was necessary6
we shall call6
from the totality6
if we wish6
to a series6
ray of light6
of our planet6
to the study6
not be regarded6
of these phenomena6
the question of6
which enables us6
would always be6
to the position6
which define the6
there are others6
most of the6
number of the6
i have made6
mass of the6
of n dimensions6
and to which6
in the course6
in the interval6
accordance with the6
as we can6
to which it6
not a question6
are the most6
of our mind6
conform to the6
james clerk maxwell6
is not yet6
as we shall6
the operation x6
of the light6
feel the impression6
to the rules6
devoted to the6
of these velocities6
by the body6
the statement of6
that a certain6
slight differences in6
law according to6
intuition of the6
know whether the6
not yet know6
all the properties6
continuum of the6
something in common6
the conditions of6
which is a6
of knowing whether6
rectilinear and uniform6
by a at6
do we know6
bodies and their6
occupied at the6
then that the6
position of this6
probability that the6
is very slight6
we are accustomed6
means of the6
rules of the6
have seen above6
and the whole6
of physical phenomena6
in an infinity6
men of science6
principles of the6
clear that the6
existence of a6
different points of6
that the series6
parameters q and6
the terms of6
the manifold of6
to study the6
of a physical6
in the following6
the fundamental plane6
a to b6
in spite of6
order in which6
sensation of convergence6
the mean value6
of possible cases6
image of the6
and sigma sigma6
of which is6
they have shown6
be divided by6
hypothesis of central6
on a portion6
but that they6
of geometry are6
the totality b6
to the physical6
said above that6
is necessary for6
to consider the6
the others are6
so much the6
occupied by the6
us by the5
is a property5
as of the5
is not null5
be one of5
not see that5
same for the5
the mixture of5
of the relations5
like that of5
effect of chance5
t u q5
the variations of5
be due to5
bound to our5
the hypothesis that5
capable of correcting5
may be a5
is this a5
at the surface5
or by a5
clear that this5
of open currents5
that it was5
whence comes this5
there are some5
that geometry is5
i am asked5
a very slight5
to take the5
but they will5
to apply to5
of the preceding5
there should be5
period of conscious5
upon the initial5
it should not5
but it has5
less than the5
perhaps it will5
the instantaneous axis5
a simple law5
in which it5
on a closed5
same sensation of5
a rule of5
pass to the5
to bring out5
the limits of5
in connection with5
is useless to5
seem to be5
its absolute velocity5
as simple as5
theory of energy5
it was in5
all the known5
is to know5
my muscular sense5
moment when the5
to know it5
to which these5
energy and the5
does not operate5
the quotient of5
from which we5
and all the5
is four times5
in favor of5
if therefore the5
lines of the5
of the fundamental5
of the game5
the body p5
if we wished5
properties of bodies5
in the latter5
is convenient to5
may be asked5
we should say5
two series sigma5
to go from5
me by the5
i mean by5
the displacement of5
the mutual distances5
any two elements5
importance of this5
in the presence5
at least the5
the finger does5
bound to the5
according to certain5
on the state5
the entire universe5
of two dimensions5
we have become5
depend upon the5
by the finger5
of the eye5
is just the5
of the cathode5
position and orientation5
same in the5
difficulties raised by5
here is a5
to the following5
be easy to5
harmony of the5
if we admit5
those who have5
taught us that5
of those which5
that would not5
known to us5
in it the5
to the end5
in the beginning5
and consequently to5
the first example5
if this were5
the expression of5
no absolute space5
to see the5
properties of phosphorus5
is subjected to5
not believe that5
is not that5
the earth in5
wish to make5
we are free5
moment of the5
so to say5
i would have5
and even the5
it is one5
will give us5
to us by5
i am about5
is perhaps not5
reveal to us5
on the nature5
so that if5
of this system5
the point m5
to their initial5
in fact the5
there are not5
is why the5
there are no5
a definition is5
a ratio of5
seen that the5
and i am5
give the name5
in space of5
given to this5
would be much5
the one or5
is subject to5
the identity of5
element of the5
find that the5
since we have5
the angles of5
aid of a5
order to be5
degree of ignorance5
it is now5
clear that if5
to reach it5
that two of5
mean that the5
the relation between5
he would not5
of the rotation5
subjected to the5
such that the5
as between the5
of the point5
is the theory5
relative position with5
of the total5
the student of5
than the other5
it is as5
they were not5
the shortest path5
the employment of5
the lines of5
coefficient of inertia5
one must be5
the kinetic energy5
must have been5
very close together5
of the british5
and could not5
certain point of5
of a system5
the totality a5
number of elements5
which is in5
if it does5
that in such5
tempted to say5
we may go5
not know whether5
in which our5
this principle of5
of these different5
know of them5
the success of5
would remain true5
of the probability5
would have remained5
it necessary to5
the one sort5
of the pendulum5
product of the5
not operate at5
to enunciate the5
we must be5
law may be5
not try to5
and the law5
will furnish us5
other in the5
the example of5
to demonstrate the5
that in a5
reality of the5
the sensation b5
that is why5
i am certain5
how can we5
other properties of5
not in the5
of a more5
we could have5
same sense as5
to deduce the5
and which i5
the tactile impressions5
is a law5
them by a5
had to be5
have any meaning5
velocities with which5
of optics and5
these definitions are5
are not yet5
the side of5
that among the5
finger does not5
is regarded as5
is it possible5
or to the5
nature of things5
theory of light5
not correspond to5
would be nothing5
of the ellipse5
to tell us5
in view of5
deduced from it5
can not say5
field due to5
of a millimeter5
are infinite in5
if we adopt5
same time a5
it is interesting5
all the more5
know the initial5
according to a5
synthetic judgment a5
those we have5
the order in5
as to make5
electrons of the5
of the material5
by one of5
be determined by5
which he is5
will appear to5
the same nature5
shall see that5
supposed to be5
of mathematics and5
an aggregate of5
of the hypothesis5
we should find5
repel each other5
only to the5
economy of thought5
action of b5
we should still5
number of terms5
group of displacements5
circuit c is5
it was a5
the experiments which5
not to the5
if i am5
is greater than5
convenient to suppose5
apart from the5
our being able5
that in which5
the rough and5
the sensations of5
to act as5
which they would5
results of this5
give the same5
not be able5
the velocities with5
if we have5
not of the5
if you prefer5
the general principles5
as a function5
to do with5
odd or even5
when we shall5
to foresee the5
which can not5
all at once5
i should like5
the necessity of5
what do i5
if they had5
mathematical physics the5
we have found5
is something which5
the first to5
the knowledge of5
progress of science5
from one of5
the energy of5
of the reasoning5
the two parts5
effects of the5
the other properties5
and the most5
the application of5
which is as5
what we should5
is more convenient5
this mean that5
of electromagnetic origin5
to define the5
it would suffice5
that the principles5
because we know5
will make it5
no one will5
of the human5
the sensation a5
that will be5
the faculty of5
initial position of5
or that of5
not only is5
where the finger5
but that would5
logic of science5
not depend upon5
i well know5
a vicious circle5
absence of contradiction5
experience teaches us5
in lieu of5
know nothing of5
such a world5
simplicity of the5
expression of the5
that this object5
in the void5
probability of a5
number of words5
as little as5
as rule of5
the present time5
of this series5
of this continuum5
be the first5
do not even5
the corpuscles of5
character of the5
have spoken above5
it suffices that5
finite in number5
the boundaries of5
in their turn5
i should not5
at a given5
but i shall5
the law would5
relative motion with5
but i have5
a and the5
those of which5
of these distances5
perpendicular to the5
sensation of red5
of the elementary5
which tends to5
content with this5
the velocity is5
be asked whether5
relations between the5
when you have5
motion with reference5
there is the5
point of departure5
is necessary therefore5
say there is5
to apply it5
is the sole5
to measure the5
relation between two5
of two parts5