Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
46906	Could not the Missionary board send out an assistant?
46906	replied the doctor, courteously,"who is he?"
28750	Question: Was any of the original ironwork left?
28750	Question: Where did the old chandeliers you installed in the ceiling come from?
28750	Question: Where did you get your ideas for the woodwork?
60300	A reprieve?
60300	If,he says,"I am seeking logical consistency, the symmetry of the legal structure, how far shall I seek it?
60300	Does the right of suffrage entitle women to serve as jurors?
60300	Governor, have you a copy that you can let me have?"
60300	It says of a new member:"What will happen to him when he takes his seat in the Senate?
60300	The real question is,''Does the conduct under existing facts amount to intimidation?''
40780	2) Did the defendant commit the disseisin?
40780	As an example, is anyone happier than a moron or fool?
40780	For instance, it questioned what man would stick his head into the halter of marriage if he first weighed the inconveniences of that life?
40780	Or what woman would ever embrace her husband if she foresaw or considered the dangers of childbirth and the drudgery of motherhood?
40780	Shall they( think you) escape unpunished that have thus oppressed you, and I have been respectless of their duty and regardless of our honor?
40780	What is this, if not to be mad?
59877	***** Mr. Hardfax:"So your son left us to go into a bank in the city?
59877	--_Vaudeville News._*****"Prisoner at the bar,"said the judge,"will you have trial by judge or jury?"
59877	After this question was asked the Court said:"Is that material?"
59877	How did he acquit himself?"
59877	Mr. O''Conor, when he was at liberty, would put on the back of his head the silk hat which he always wore and say:"Who''s for a walk?"
59877	What acts of petitioner constitute the election which should bar this New Jersey proceeding?
59877	Where, then, is the evidence of lack of good faith and failure to exercise reasonable discretion?
17150	Brothel(?).
17150	If a man has broken into a house, one shall kill him before the breach and bury him in it(?).
17150	If a man has hired a( boat?)
17150	If he has hired a calf( goat?
17150	Merchant, trader, relations with agent, 100- 107. official(?
17150	Strength of a man, crown of the head(?
17150	scale fixed by king, 44, 51. wages fixed for-- boatman, 6_ GUR_ of corn_ per annum_, 239. working ox, 4,,,, 242. cow in milk,(?)
36299	2) Did the defendant commit the disseisin?
36299	As an example, is anyone happier than a moron or fool?
36299	For instance, it questioned what man would stick his head into the halter of marriage if he first weighed the inconveniences of that life?
36299	Or what woman would ever embrace her husband if she foresaw or considered the dangers of childbirth and the drudgery of motherhood?
36299	Shall they( think you) escape unpunished that have thus oppressed you, and I have been respectless of their duty and regardless of our honor?
36299	What am I?
36299	What am I?
36299	What is this, if not to be mad?
13376	2) Did the defendant commit the disseisin?
13376	And the said John Solas is bound to the said Thomas Profyt in 100 pounds by a bond to make defense of the said lands and tenements by the bribery(?)
13376	As an example, is anyone happier than a moron or fool?
13376	For instance, it questioned what man would stick his head into the halter of marriage if he first weighed the inconveniences of that life?
13376	Or what woman would ever embrace her husband if she foresaw or considered the dangers of childbirth and the drudgery of motherhood?
13376	Shall they( think you) escape unpunished that have thus oppressed you, and I have been respectless of their duty and regardless of our honor?
13376	What am I?
13376	What am I?
13376	What is this, if not to be mad?
6603	2) Did the defendant commit the disseisin?
6603	And the said John Solas is bound to the said Thomas Profyt in 100 pounds by a bond to make defence of the said lands and tenements by the bribery(?)
6603	As an example, is anyone happier than a moron or fool?
6603	For instance, it questioned what man would stick his head into the halter of marriage if he first weighed the inconveniences of that life?
6603	Or what woman would ever embrace her husband if she foresaw or considered the dangers of childbirth and the drudgery of motherhood?
6603	Shall they( think you) escape unpunished that have thus oppressed you, and I have been respectless of their duty and regardless of our honor?
6603	What am I?
6603	What am I?
6603	What is this, if not to be mad?
4638	How so?
4638	About a week later I met Uncle Billy on the street again and said to him,"How is this Uncle Billy, I thought you were going home on the last steamer?"
4638	After they parted I approached the one left and said,"Is this Uncle Billy?"
4638	But what shall I say of them?
4638	He said,"Are you going to sell it?"
4638	He stopped and looked at me a minute and then said,"Young man, how deep do you expect to go before you reach bedrock?"
4638	I said to him,"How are you fixed, Uncle Billy?"
4638	I turned around and went back to the office, to the same counter and clerk, and said to him,"Do you rectify mistakes here?"
4638	Mr. Lincoln smilingly asked,"What good would it do for our people to go down to Mexico even if the railroads were built?
4638	On the relief of the outer sentinel and his return to camp, Lamalfa issued the challenge which was to repeat three times"Who comes there?"
4638	The clerk brought it forward at once and I said,"How much for the deposit?"
4638	The two brothers met one day opposite the unfinished building and James said,"Peter why do n''t you go on and finish your building?"
4638	Which shall be the balance of power, the first or the last?
2373	But from his point of view, what is the difference between being fined and taxed a certain sum for doing a certain thing?
2373	But what does it mean to a bad man?
2373	But why do you imply it?
2373	Do we deal with criminals on proper principles?
2373	Does punishment deter?
2373	Has the defendant gained a right or not?
2373	If so, why should it not be required in all contracts?
2373	Is it a useful form?
2373	Sometimes the desirability of peace, but why is peace more desirable after twenty years than before?
2373	Take the fundamental question, What constitutes the law?
2373	What does this mean?
2373	What have we better than a blind guess to show that the criminal law in its present form does more good than harm?
2373	What significance is there in calling one taking right and another wrong from the point of view of the law?
2373	Why is a false and injurious statement privileged, if it is made honestly in giving information about a servant?
2373	Why is a man at liberty to set up a business which he knows will ruin his neighborhood?
2373	Why should any merely historical distinction be allowed to affect the rights and obligations of business men?
30802	A custom, that lands shall descend to the most worthy of the owner''s blood, is void; for how shall this worth be determined?
30802	But how does it interpose and compel?
30802	But how was this to be effected?
30802	But then what is the pledge which the public faith has pawned for the security of these debts?
30802	But where does this money exist?
30802	But, as all the members of society are naturally equal, it may be asked, in whose hands are the reins of government to be entrusted?
30802	For where is the difference, whether the people declare their assent to a law by suffrage, or by a uniform course of acting accordingly?"
49419	And what did England answer? 49419 If that power,"said Mr. O''Connell,"so claimed, had really existed, where was the necessity for passing that statute?
49419	What,he says,"if we should agree to make burying in woollen a fashion, as our neighbours have made it a law?"
49419	And why?
49419	But how had England kept its word?
49419	Is this equality?
49419	Pitt goes on to say:''But how stands the case now( 1799)?
49419	Whence did the money come?
49419	Whether, nevertheless, there is any other people whose wants may be more easily supplied from home?
49419	Why was no attempt made for their relief?
49419	Would that enable them to undersell us?
8691	Certainly, Sir,was the quick retort,"and may I beg your honor to take the wool out of your ears?
8691	Are the courts to send such questions to a jury or shall the judges decide them?
8691	But may not a power be judicial in its nature and yet not wholly so?
8691	But out of what did this doctrine spring?
8691	But what is a suit?
8691	But what shall be the nature of this office, and who shall decide whether these conditions have been fulfilled and these papers filed?
8691	Can anything less than that be considered as due process of law?
8691	Can that be deemed a judicial sentence to imprisonment which is a sentence to imprisonment during the pleasure of certain administrative officials?
8691	Could they sue and be sued in the courts of the United States?
8691	How far can the courts, in dealing with these, govern their action by that of the executive?
8691	If so, ought not the fate to be meted out to them by judicial authority?
8691	Rufus Choate once said that the question at bottom was, Are you afraid to trust the people?
8691	What is due process of law?
8691	What is property?
8691	What serves to establish one?
8691	What, he asked, was this law of the land by which all things were to be tried and judged?
8691	Who, he asked, were the present judges of their Supreme Court?
30872	And our allies, at this time natural, must they not imagine, that it is better to have in us declared enemies than pretended friends?
30872	And shall we not be involved in a ruinous war, which we might have rendered advantageous, if it had been well directed?
30872	Are we the children of Great Britain, any more than the cities of London, Exeter and Bath?
30872	But let me intreat you, Sir, to pause-- Do you consider yourself as a missionary of loyalty or of rebellion?
30872	Have they not reason to conclude from it, that our inaction ought to be less attributed to our weakness, than to our affection for England?
30872	Is not the human understanding exhausted there?
30872	It is even of more consequence to the rich themselves, and to their posterity.--The only question is, whether it is a public emolument?
30872	Let me intreat you to consider, will the mother be pleased, when you represent her as deaf to the cries of her children?
30872	That the ocean, heretofore covered with our vessels, should see at present scarcely any?
30872	When you compare her to the infamous miscreant, who lately stood on the gallows for starving her child?
30872	Will not this delay occasion a suspicion that we prefer the interest of our enemy to that of our country?
30872	Will not this opinion destroy all confidence in our nation heretofore so renowned in this respect?
30872	that in 1780, more than two thousands of Dutch vessels having passed the Sound, not one was found upon the list in 1781?
22910	Do you promise that you will deliver me such and such a slave, at such and such a place, on such and such a day?
22910	All this is easily understood by a modern; but who are the Agnates?
22910	But in what capacity did he acquire them?
22910	But there is still the question, Why did Primogeniture gradually supersede every other principle of succession?
22910	But what was the Family?
22910	But why?
22910	How came it to be a question whether invariable sequence was identical with necessary connection?
22910	How was authority so little definite reconciled with a settled condition of society and of law?
22910	I must confine myself to two questions: how far did Maine develop or modify in his subsequent writings the main thesis of_ Ancient Law_?
22910	The next question is, what is the nature of this union and the degree of intimacy which it involves?
22910	What then is meant by saying that the Slave was originally included in the Family?
22910	What then is the inference?
22910	What then is the reason of this arbitrary inclusion and exclusion?
22910	What then was involved in this nexum or bond?
22910	What was an Obligation?
22910	What was the exact point of contact between the old Jus Gentium and the Law of Nature?
22910	Why did this not occur in the feudal world?
22910	Why were they not successively included among the favoured objects of enjoyment?
22910	and how came it that the dead were allowed to control the posthumous disposition of their property?
22910	to what extent has this thesis stood the test of the criticism and research of others?
22910	to whom and in what form does it pass?
38589	Fines, for what?
38589	Is that all?
38589	It will be said, this Statute has been read Reversely in our sister England, where It is the Charter of proud Chanticleer; But what of that? 38589 What is this to the purpose?"
38589	You had as good say nothing,observed the Recorder, and the Lord Mayor added,"Was it not an unlawful assembly?
38589	And what of hares in coursing run to death?
38589	Are we to find Game Cocks, domestic fowls?
38589	Are we to hold that birds, are animals?
38589	As to the legal penalty of adultery, are we quite sure that, according to results, we have greatly improved upon the old Bible Law?
38589	But what, it was asked, should be done where a one- eyed man happened to put out one of his neighbour''s eyes?
38589	Does this not offer a fine comment on the grievous usury so cruelly enforced in after years by these people upon the_ Gentile_ races?
38589	Have you considered substantially the whole evidence as it was declared and recited?
38589	How again came it that a claim of feudal service might be departed from by the delivery and placing of a wand(_ virgula_) upon the altar?
38589	How came this singular procedure into Scottish practice?
38589	How much of this was suspicion substantiated by torture?
38589	Of quivering foxes torn by yelling hounds?
38589	Of wheeling pigeons slaughtered for a prize?
38589	One can understand why a sod should be so often a token, but why does the glove play so large a part in Merovingian and Carolingian conveyancing?
38589	Should he lose his only eye by way of retaliation?
38589	The Queen''s crown, the Judge''s ermine, the Mayor''s mace, what are they else?
38589	The question then arises,"On what grounds was this intercourse conducted?"
38589	Was it in Herrick''s mind when he penned his fine tribute to Selden?
38589	Was there some such boon in bonny Scotland?
38589	What does B do?
38589	What was to be done?
38589	Whose was the ring?
38589	Why for example amongst the Saxons should a resignation of all interest in an estate have been made by a gesture with curved fingers?
32168	As Ames puts it,"the unmoral standard of acting at one''s peril"is replaced by the question,"Was the act blameworthy?"
32168	But are we required to choose?
32168	But does not Miller when hard pressed resort to something very like social- utilitarianism?
32168	But does not this also require demonstration?
32168	But have we any given to us absolutely?
32168	Do the facts come within or fail to come within the legal precept?
32168	Do they promote or do they impede social interdependence through similarity of interest and division of labor?
32168	For how can there be law unless as a body of rules declaring a natural law which is above all human enactment?
32168	Gmelin, Quousque?
32168	If the courts do not respect the law, who will?
32168	Is New York a community of artisans but Massachusetts a community of landowners?
32168	Is the end of law anything less than to do whatever may be achieved thereby to satisfy human desires?
32168	May we not learn something from the futility of all efforts to administer justice exclusively by either method?
32168	May we not refer these phenomena, not to the will of the person bound, but to another postulate of civilized society and its corollaries?
32168	This raises in the first instance the question"How is a merely juridical or rational[ as distinguished from a purely physical] possession possible?"
32168	What common elements may we find in the foregoing twelve pictures of what law is?
32168	What was the need of the time which philosophy was called upon to satisfy?
32168	Why should these"abstract"promises be enforced and not others?
55724	Nay,said others,"how forfeit the ocean?"
55724	Thou fals trayter,yelled he;"why arte thou soo longe in fals bytter beleve?"
55724	What,urged he in effect,"was the use of actual entry, lease and ouster?
55724	When shall we reach these ploughshares?
55724	Where is your lieutenant?
55724	And if, not the tenant, but the landlord himself, were deprived of his property?
55724	And the land- owners?
55724	And what of the dogs?
55724	And what was the legal status of the press- gang?
55724	As he marched forward he was addressed by the Constable,"Who art thou, and wherefore comest thou armed to the door of these lists?"
55724	But how far can we trust these entertaining authors?
55724	But how if the slayer were a lad?
55724	But how to riddle this one?
55724	But there was the rub-- how about death by suffocation?
55724	Did Broadfoot grasp the fact that they were trespassers?
55724	Did the vision of that unseemly shroud really disturb poor Nance Oldfield''s last moments, as Pope would have us believe?
55724	Has not that its Lumber Room of repealed Statutes, discarded methods, antiquated text- books--"many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore"?
55724	He made a passionate appeal to the Court("Did not perhaps God open the mouth of Balaam''s ass?"
55724	How_ not_ to sink under such conditions?
55724	If he answered,"Not guilty,"the next question was:"Culprit, how will you be tried?"
55724	If in spite of all it went softly down, who dared to refuse belief in the man''s innocence?
55724	In other words, was A. the real owner of the land?
55724	In this action the main point evidently was: Had A. a right to grant C. the lease?
55724	Is it fanciful to apply this image to the Law?
55724	Of old time man''s dress was rich and varied, but how to catch its vanished effect?
55724	She was moved not a whit; and then Rhodes, the other judge, broke in:"Why stand we all day about this naughty, wilful woman?"
55724	THE CUSTOM OF THE MANOR Has chance or necessity ever opened to you the charter- chest of the respectable solicitor in some country town?
55724	The clerk then asked him,"How say you, are you guilty or not guilty?"
55724	The rope seemed past praying for, but what about the bell?
55724	Thus, a man died by misadventure: then was the material cause active or passive?
55724	To put a prisoner before a jury without his consent was not to be thought of; but how to get his consent?
55724	To take a later instance, was not Shakespeare himself the most illustrious of poachers?
55724	Well, could he read?
55724	Were the judges to encamp in a country town while the prisoners made up their mind as to pleading?
55724	Will his vouchers vouch him no more of his purchases, and double ones too, than the length and breadth of a pair of indentures?"
55724	or, if anyone not in possession claimed a piece of land as his freehold?
38238	And St. Ambrose:"For who does not consider an injury to the body, or the loss of patrimony, less than injury to the spirit or the loss of reputation?"
38238	And was not that honour sufficiently avenged by the death of his wife?
38238	And who can deny that he ought to be somewhat excused, if afterwards he took vengeance for such a violation?
38238	And why can he not bring some other no less convincing proof, if honour urged Franceschini thereto?
38238	And would he not even have had his wife declared an adulteress for the sake of gaining the dowry?
38238	As soon as Signora Violante saw and heard this she took pity on me and exclaimed to the said Signori:"Where do you wish the poor thing to go now?"
38238	But if you do[ not?]
38238	But what did he do?
38238	But what does not a man lose when he allows his wife to rule him?
38238	December(?)
38238	Did she acknowledge herself guilty of any sin, or of any wrong done to him in guarding her purity and modesty?
38238	How then can these authorities be applied to our case?
38238	How then may a man endure to leave adultery unavenged, which is known to have been committed to his eternal disgrace?
38238	So in the present case, according to the same author:"By this young and passionate man is she supposed to have been returned still a virgin?"
38238	Therefore you will not pass[?]
38238	What did Franceschini answer?
38238	What did he try to do, although he was armed with a sword against his defenceless wife and against Caponsacchi, who had with him only a little dagger?
38238	What hinders me from laying you out here?
38238	When his wife saw him, did she, timid as she was, shrink back?
38238	Who indeed desires that anything else than justice be administered, and especially when dealing with poor imprisoned wretches?
38238	Why did they, as I may say, cherish her in their breasts, not merely up till the birth of her child, but even till death?
38238	Why imbrue himself straightway with the blood of Violante and Pietro, who were not accomplices in the pretended dishonour?
12911	A star? 12911 It is; what will you take?"
12911	No sight? 12911 What are sail- needles?"
12911	What do you think of it?
12911	Whom shall we name?
12911	Yes; but is he also able? 12911 After the lecture, a few days later, he turned to me and asked,Is she here?"
12911	And until we have made our own churches fully free and fruitful in spiritual life are we absolved from the call to service?
12911	And what course can we pursue to get the most and the best out of it?
12911	Boylike I would say,"Father, what shall I do?"
12911	But what_ is_ best in life?
12911	Can you wonder that I have kept this from you?
12911	Do you know I believe work with boys is about the only hope?
12911	Finally I mentioned, casually like, that I was_ Tom_, whereat he feigned surprise, and remarked in his pleasant voice,"Was that you?
12911	HAVE WE DONE OUR WORK?
12911	Have we earned our discharge from the army of life?
12911	Have we not done our work?"
12911	He smilingly replied,"You see its place?
12911	How passed the night through thy long waking?"
12911	I arose well at the side of the chamber, while the leader stood directly in front, but the Speaker happened(?)
12911	I asked,"Who do you think we have in mind?"
12911	I said,"What''s the idea?"
12911	If an Indian wishes to ask where you are going, he will say,"Ta hunt tow ingya?"
12911	If he is not read, whose fault is it?
12911	In all innocence I asked the somewhat leading question:"What did Jesus charge them?"
12911	Is it possible that after a separation of nearly six years I have at last met my father?
12911	Is it?--and if not, why not?
12911	Langdon would suggest some procedure:"How will this do, Jim?"
12911	My own sister asked in indignation:"Who is that old man making eyes at me?"
12911	OUR FATHER Is God our Father?
12911	On every hand was heard the question,"What shall we do with our boys?"
12911	One of the members later cornered him and asked"Where is the watershed?"
12911	Shall human will succumb to fate, Crushed by the happenings of a day?
12911	Shall we retreat?
12911	The brother lingered and finally drawled,"Deacon, it''s customary, is n''t it, to_ treat_ a buyer?"
12911	The elder, looking up, said,"Why did n''t the pesky fool bring her with him?"
12911	The fifth line of the seventh verse originally read:"Or is civilization a failure?"
12911	Then of Perkins he asked,"By the way, Senator, how is Brady doing?"
12911	There are those who say,"Why should we keep it up?
12911	WHY THE CHURCH?
12911	We met one of his friends, who said,"How are you, Ames?"
12911	What is the most important thing in life?
12911	What is their testimony in this particular case?
12911	Where are the sellers of lottery tickets, where the horse- races and the open gambling?
12911	Who are we that we should complain that life is hard, or conclude that it is not better so?
12911	Why do we covet other opportunities instead of doing the best with those we have?
12911	no sound?"
15752	But,said the man who had lost and who held the horse,"the bridle certainly belongs to me, he does not take the bridle, does he?"
15752	How big was the sack?
15752	How much have you been paid for the decision?
15752	My dear Mr. Peck,I said,"will you trust me for two weeks''board?"
15752	What did the motion that Judge Terry made with his right hand indicate to you?
15752	What is this, Lake?
15752	And if so, why should the punishment be less?
15752	And was it not so in this case?
15752	As I entered he looked up and said,"Why, Judge, you do n''t look well, what is the matter?"
15752	As soon as I said this the owner of the bridle turned to his adversary and said,"What will you take for the horse?"
15752	Aspinwall replied,"But I do n''t know anything about your onions and potatoes; how should I?
15752	Broderick?"
15752	Can I help you?"
15752	Can the authority of the United States for the protection of their officers be less than their authority to protect their property?
15752	Customer:"What was done about it?"
15752	Did Judge Turner give any directions to the sheriff to arrest Judge Haun, notwithstanding he was holding his court?
15752	Did Mr. Field, in consequence of the order of Judge Turner, leave the court- room in company with the deputy sheriff?
15752	Did the Court of Sessions of Yuba County hold a session on that day?
15752	Did you continue in the District Court or did you go to the Court of Sessions?
15752	Did you spurn the wretch away who made a corrupt proposal to you, or did you hold counsel, sweet counsel with him?
15752	Do n''t you think it is a large knife?"
15752	Do you realize the fact, my dear Judge, that more than a quarter of a century has elapsed since these events transpired?
15752	Every one in greeting me, said"It is a glorious country,"or"Is n''t it a glorious country?"
15752	Field was fined by Judge Turner and ordered to be imprisoned?
15752	Has Mr. Field or Mr. Mulford ever been restored to the bar by the District Court since the order of expulsion on the 10th of June?
15752	Has that order ever been vacated on the records of the District Court?
15752	He replied,"What is it that worries you?"
15752	How then?
15752	How was he to be punished?
15752	I asked,"Why not?"
15752	I hurried back to the saloon; and as the jurors were standing about chatting with each other I exclaimed,"How is this?
15752	I replied,"But, suppose a man puts his name down and afterwards do n''t want the lots?"
15752	If this be not so, in the language of the Supreme Court,"Why do we have marshals at all?"
15752	Just at this moment Mr. Rodman M. Price, formerly Governor of New Jersey, made his appearance and exclaimed,"How is this?
15752	Mr. Wigginton said that Mrs. Terry asked her husband what he could do, and he replied, showing more feeling than he had before:"Do?
15752	Mrs. Terry took a third seat from him, and seeing him, said:"What, are you in this car too?"
15752	Shall it be said that Justice Field ought to have gone to the nearest justice of the peace and obsequiously begged to have Terry placed under bonds?
15752	She repeated her question:"Are you going to take the responsibility of ordering me to deliver up that contract?"
15752	Then, after a short pause, I remarked,"What is the case against your prisoner?
15752	Turning to me he said,"You say it is all right?"
15752	Was the order entered on the records of the District Court, expelling Messrs. Field, Goodwin, and Mulford?
15752	Was the trial of Cameron against Sutter proceeded with after Mr. Field left?
15752	Were any directions given about a posse?
15752	Were any members of the bar expelled by Judge Turner on that day?
15752	Were you in court on the 10th day of June?
15752	What day was that order entered?
15752	What useful functions can they perform in the economy of the National Government?
15752	What value would there be to a title in one man, with a right of invasion in the whole world?
15752	What was to be done with the prisoner?
15752	What, then, would your court do?
15752	When you had removed the cover you raised the lid slightly, but in a moment said to me,"What is this, Lake?
15752	Who can say that her spirit was not then hovering over him and whispering caution in his ear?
15752	Who knows but that a mother''s prayer for the protection of her son, breathed years before, was answered then?
15752	Who made up the records of the Court of Sessions on that day?
15752	Who took the place of Mr. Field after he left?
15752	You have sent Turner where there are only grizzly bears and Indians; why not let him remain there?
15752	or"Did you ever see a more glorious country?"
15752	you have not had your cigars?
60238	Stop a minute,said Parsons,"do you want advice as to the moral aspect of the case or as to the legal aspect of it?"
60238	True, sir,said Pinkney, who affected to be a man of fashion,"but can a gentleman dress in less than four hours?"
60238	''Oh, how are you?
60238	''What do we care whether Myers agrees with the case, or what Fessenden thinks of the dissenting opinion?
60238	( a) How soon after the death of a testator may his will be admitted to probate?
60238	( b) How soon after the death of an intestate may administration of his estate be granted?
60238	Adams, do you agree with that?''
60238	And what about internal affairs?
60238	Are individual enterprise and talent to be smothered by rule?
60238	At common law what right had a husband in personal property acquired by the wife during coverture?
60238	At the end of the three months was G liable?
60238	Can he succeed if the special relief prayed for fails?
60238	Cave?''
60238	Could he do so?
60238	Could he maintain his action?
60238	Could he maintain his action?
60238	Could he recover?
60238	Could it do so?
60238	Could she succeed?
60238	Could the defendant avail himself of it?
60238	From what date should interest be allowed, if at all?
60238	How can the place be filled?
60238	How could A test his title, B refusing to bring an action?
60238	How drawn?
60238	How is an issue of fact created in a lawsuit?
60238	How many incorporators must there be to incorporate a company in New Jersey?
60238	How recorded?
60238	How should service of summons and complaint be made in a case where an affidavit of merits is desired?
60238	How should the answer be construed?
60238	If so, how should he proceed and what must he show?
60238	In what case and under what circumstances can a writ of error issue directly from the Court of Errors and Appeals to the Court of Oyer and Terminer?
60238	Is our transportation industry to be ruined by taxes and rate control at one end and cost of labor at the other?
60238	Is the Constitution of the United States a worn- out old one- horse shay, ready to drop to pieces all at once?
60238	Is the Senate a back number?
60238	Is the objection good?
60238	Is the peaceful rule by majority to be exchanged for Bolshevik dictatorship?
60238	Or will they, already talking again of a scrap of paper, straightway begin to prepare for a fresh coup twenty- five years or so hence?
60238	Peal after peal: some good news: what is it?
60238	Rawle, will you give the plaintiff''s argument?''
60238	Should he divulge this fact to B, who has had nothing to do with his employment?
60238	Should he recover?
60238	Should the firm divide its fees with the clerk?
60238	Should the motion be granted?
60238	Should the motion be granted?
60238	Should this evidence be admitted?
60238	Should this evidence be received?
60238	The clerk:"Why did you not answer?"
60238	To whom did her real and personal estate go on her death?
60238	To whom did the title to the land and to whom do the bonds descend?
60238	Was he bound to do so?
60238	Was he liable?
60238	Was he liable?
60238	Was he liable?
60238	Was his claim good?
60238	Was it a valid sale?
60238	Was it correct?
60238	Was it valid as to the chattels against creditors of the company?
60238	Was she entitled to the same?
60238	Was the Court right?
60238	Was the judgment binding upon the firm?
60238	Was the principal liable for these acts of the agent?
60238	Was the ruling correct?
60238	Was this charge correct?
60238	Was this contrary to the Bulk Sales Act of 1915?
60238	Was this legal?
60238	Was this legal?
60238	Was this possible?
60238	Was this proper?
60238	Was this ruling correct?
60238	What are the requirements to make an instrument negotiable?
60238	What facts should appear in the certificate and how should it be executed?
60238	What is the difference between the relief granted in equity in cases of mutual mistake and of the mistake of one party?
60238	What is the rule in New Jersey?
60238	What kind of action could M institute against D?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What we want to know is:"What''s the law?"''
60238	What would you advise your client to do?
60238	Where may the venue be laid in a transitory action?
60238	Which has priority?
60238	Will peace last?
60238	Will the Germans respect their promises and fulfill them?
60238	Will the treaty finally be ratified?
60238	_ Why not_?
36045	( 2) What is to be done unto them?
36045	And what did he suggest?
36045	And what was that?
36045	And why not?
36045	But how did thi''first grandfeyther get it?
36045	But,says my hopeful friend Joseph,"what is the meaning of a chap filing his own petition?
36045	Did they, now?
36045	How do I know it is yours, and who gave it you?
36045	My dear, simple fellow, you surely do not think the clever ones of the earth who look after your interests have not thought all that out? 36045 My good man,"said my lord,"do you know you are trespassing?"
36045	Vot vas it all about?
36045	Was there no agreement between you?
36045	Well, wot of it?
36045	What case was that?
36045	What has it all got to do with you, Joseph?
36045	What right has he to bring me here?
36045	Which nation?
36045	Why?
36045	''Recreation?''
36045	1512 do but run into debt?
36045	1512 of 1911 and his like?
36045	1512 of 1911?
36045	:"Does a successful husband always have to pay his wife''s costs?"
36045	And I''m sure she loved her old man-- so what must she have thought of us and our Act of Parliament?
36045	And surely we may ask, Why should this miserable cheat flourish among decent citizens of to- day?
36045	And what has come of it all?
36045	And what makes these things possible among our poor people?
36045	Are we not here in the face of a real danger to the nation?
36045	Are you quite satisfied?
36045	B. battering C. D. to the intent that whichever knocked the stuffing out of the other gained the verdict?
36045	But why should public- houses be what they are?
36045	Can not she trade in her own name?
36045	For if the rich have by their laws made a mess of the alehouse, what about the other public- house-- the workhouse?
36045	For what is a General Mixed Workhouse?
36045	For what is"bias"?
36045	Have I said enough, my dear friend?
36045	How are they to obtain witnesses?
36045	How often, too, do men and women buy watches to pawn them for drink or a day at the races?
36045	If you ca n''t''ave a dorg, how can you keep them fellows out of the house?"
36045	Is not she a married woman?
36045	It is very true, Hall, you might say,''Where was all the money to come from to pay for all this?''
36045	It may be that such is the law; but if it is what does it mean?
36045	Meanwhile, why should not direct representatives of the agricultural labourer be placed upon the bench if we are not to abolish Dogberry altogether?
36045	Now what worries me is, why should the State keep Courts going for men of this class?
36045	Or is there some subtle essence in the law that of necessity destroys the favourable microbes that promote peace and goodwill among men?
36045	Should not a man or woman be made to trade in his or her own name?
36045	So I said if the law do n''t let''i m bite''em, what''s the use of the dorg?
36045	The rich man''s public- house is so regulated-- and what is the result?
36045	The wolves and bisons?
36045	These being the facts, why does the law side with the inappropriate knave who preys upon the harmless necessary fool?
36045	They have obviously no interest in ideal public houses-- and why should they?
36045	Vot is the matter with you?"
36045	What could the proprietor do?
36045	What has become of that closing time which, if overstepped by the poor, means police court for the criminals and loss of license to the innkeeper?
36045	What is this but an evil and ruinous form of moneylending?
36045	What match are confiding folk like these for the lying scallywags who tout their inferior wares round the streets?
36045	What wages can satisfy such an orgy of drapery as that?
36045	What, then, is to be done?
36045	When shall we find time to ease these heavy burdens of the poor and let the oppressed go free?
36045	Who of God''s creatures had a right to live in it?
36045	Whose land_ was_ this of Britain?
36045	Why did it fail?
36045	Why is all this to be swept away?"
36045	Why is it to be supposed that any different result will be arrived at when the working classes are no longer tempted by a false system of credit?
36045	Why is such a person punished?
36045	Why may not the working man have similar entertainment at the Pig and Whistle?
36045	Why should it be altered, especially as there is no great demand for change, and change is in itself an evil thing?
36045	Why should n''t I file my petition?"
36045	Why should n''t I go bankrupt?"
36045	Why should not every hamlet have its Village Plowden to brighten life on the country side?
36045	Why should not lawyers set an example of self- sacrifice and unselfishness?
36045	Why should they help the Devil to make his house sweet and attractive, and make the path easier for the poor sinner who thirsts after beer?
36045	Why should you expect in him a super- instinct towards futurist sociology?
36045	Will you?
36045	Will you?
36045	Wo n''t you?
36045	Wo n''t you?
36045	Would he get anyone to advise him on evidence or settle the indorsement on his writ?
36045	You ask a debtor when he comes before you on a second instalment of a debt:"But you managed to pay the first instalment?"
36045	and what I wanted to arsk you was, may my dorg bite''em within reason or did I''ave to pay five pounds''cause''e mauled''i m too much?"
36045	he cried;"do you mean to say that the companies and the men have agreed upon you as chairman?"
36045	on to a small debt like this for costs?
12564	Am I in the road to Stockton, and can I get there tonight?
12564	Are you a preacher?
12564	Can I get something to eat? 12564 Can you wait until I preach my sermon?"
12564	Did you ever get your free- papers?
12564	Did you ever shoot an Indian?
12564	Did you know there was quite a quarrel about you this morning?
12564	Do n''t you wish you were a Kentuckian?
12564	Do you mean Dick?
12564	Do you mean the literal restoration of the Jews to Palestine?
12564	Do you think a young girl of twenty could love an old man like me?
12564	Excuse me, my old friend, if I ask if you do not, as a dying man, have some thoughts about God and eternity?
12564	Hard at it, are you, uncle?
12564	How are you today, Dan?
12564	How are you today?
12564	How do you feel about changing worlds, my old friend?
12564	How is his health?
12564	How long will it take you?
12564	How was that?
12564	How?
12564	I was brought up partly in Virginia too?
12564	Is he dead?
12564	Is there any hope of her restoration?
12564	Me take um?
12564	Missus, who is yer kinfolks back dar in Virginny, any way?
12564	Of what persuasion are you?!
12564	Shall I kneel here and pray with you?
12564	So you were corralled last night?
12564	So you were corralled last night?
12564	Wbar''bouts, in Virginny?
12564	Were any of the women killed?
12564	What do you mean?
12564	What for?
12564	What has become of B--?
12564	What is lead?
12564	What is the matter here?
12564	What is the matter?
12564	What is the matter?
12564	What is the meaning of that remark?
12564	What was the name of the proprietor of the house?
12564	What''s the matter?
12564	Where''s you from, Massa?
12564	Who hath defied God and escaped?
12564	Why so? 12564 Would he let me talk to him?"
12564	Yes-- is there any thing we can do for you?
12564	Yes; what of it?
12564	You got grub-- coche carne?
12564	You makee Christian newspaper? 12564 About four o''clock in the afternoon Dick''s mistress sat down by me, and, after a pause, remarked:Do you know that tomorrow is Christmas- day?"
12564	And does the Wisest Worker take Quick human hearts, instead of stone, And hew and carve them one by one, Nor heed the pangs with which they break?
12564	And more: if but creation''s waste, Would he have given us sense to yearn For the perfection none can earn, And hope the fuller life to taste?
12564	Are the real queens as happy?
12564	But what was the Emperor after?
12564	But what will God do with them hereafter?
12564	Can I get shelter with you for the night?"
12564	Did he also pray?
12564	Did such a dream cast a momentary glamour over a life spent in raking among the muck- heaps?
12564	Did this sordid old man yearn for pure human love amid his millions?
12564	Did you ever hear a sweeter voice than that?"
12564	Do sane men and women ever commit suicide?
12564	Do you see that tall pumping- apparatus, with water- tank on top, in the rear of the house?"
12564	Doctor, God never gave me up, and I never ceased to yearn for his mercy and love, even in the darkest season of my unhappy life?"
12564	Eternity?
12564	Fixing his stern and fiery gaze upon her, and knitting his great bushy eyebrows, he thundered the question:"Sister, do you ever pray?"
12564	Have you not noted these malign coincidences in life?
12564	He opened and read it as we drove slowly along, and as he did so he brightened up, and turning to Henry, said:"Henry, were you ever a slave?"
12564	His mother, who bent over him with a pale face, noticed the look, and almost screamed:"''Tommy, here is your mother-- don''t you know me?''
12564	His text was, Who hath hardened himself against him, and hath prospered?
12564	How can I live?
12564	How can she give up her child?
12564	How long, how long?
12564	I said:"What yer want wid me?"
12564	I want to see him once more; where will I be likely to find him?''
12564	If the inevitable why?
12564	Is it in the circumstances, the external conditions?
12564	Kinneth?"
12564	One night I preached from the text, Should it be according to thy mind?
12564	Rome ground them under her iron heel, and where is the empire of the Caesars?
12564	She received me with a mixture of mock dignity and smiling condescension, and surveying herself admiringly, she asked:"How do you like my dress?"
12564	Spain smote the Jew, and where is her glory?
12564	Strange?
12564	The Assyrian smote the Jew, and where is the proud Assyrian Empire?
12564	The General spoke:"Did you know, sir, that I am perhaps the most attentive reader of your paper to be found in California?"
12564	The words were something like these, but who could picture Baker''s oratory?
12564	Was this the charm that drew him forth so early?
12564	What do you think?"
12564	What do you think?"
12564	What does God say?
12564	What have I done, that it should be proposed to send me to the Legislature?
12564	What have I done?"
12564	What mysteries of being lie beyond that sapphire sea?
12564	What reason has anybody to think I am that sort of a man?
12564	What was the mystery?
12564	What were her thoughts as she sat there looking so pitifully up into the silent, far- off heavens?
12564	What wonders shall burst upon the vision when this mortal shall put on immortality?
12564	What''s dat?
12564	Where are you from?"
12564	Where is happiness, after all?
12564	Who says man is not a fallen, broken creature, and that there is not a devil at hand to tempt him?
12564	Who that ever had a real friend does not?
12564	Why call us back to a world where we lost all, and in quitting which we risked all?
12564	Why not give it up?"
12564	Will ye take the turkey, and my thanks wid it?"
12564	Would you like some eggs?
12564	You talkee Jesus?
12564	You will pray for me?"
12564	do n''t you hear her?
12564	is this what thy creature man was made for?
12564	once or twice, and here he would come, stretching his long legs, and saying,"Oot,""oot,""oot"( is that the way to spell it?).
12564	or, is it in the mind?
44800	How is that possible,says he,"since these arts were invented by Trismegistus?"
44800	Amongst good laws, one of the best things was, that everybody was taught to observe them( by whom?).
44800	And have I not experience on my side?
44800	And if mankind is not competent to judge for itself, why do they talk so much about universal suffrage?
44800	And is it not clear, that the interest of all being one and the same, some would act without much inconvenience to the others?
44800	And what are these two questions?
44800	And what does this prove?
44800	And what has resulted from it?
44800	And what is liberty?
44800	And what is the remedy proposed?
44800	And what part have men to act in all this?
44800	And who is to give the impulse to power?
44800	And why is incapacity a reason for exclusion?
44800	And, in all sincerity, can anything more be required at the hands of the law?
44800	And, in fact, what is the political work that we are endeavoring to promote?
44800	Are age, sex, and judicial condemnations the only conditions to which incapacity is to be attached?
44800	Are not our persons and property in fact, at its disposal?
44800	Are not rights equal?
44800	Are political rights under discussion?
44800	Are the people to be forever led about by the nose?
44800	Are they not arrived at maturity?
44800	Are they not in a state to judge for themselves?
44800	Are we not living in an age of enlightenment?
44800	Are we not told that liberty is competition?
44800	But are we not assured by Mr. Considerant that liberty leads fatally to monopoly?
44800	But how is it that Mr. Montalembert does not see that he is placing himself in a vicious circle?
44800	But how is it to be distinguished?
44800	But what does it do?
44800	But what is this incline?
44800	But what plunder did he mean?
44800	By whose intervention is society to give tools of labor to those who do not possess them?
44800	Can the law, whose necessary sanction is force, be reasonably employed upon anything beyond securing to every one his right?
44800	Can the people be mistaken?
44800	Do not the legislators and their agents form a part of the human race?
44800	Do they consider that they are composed of different materials from the rest of mankind?
44800	Do they not know their own interest?
44800	Does it follow that if the law confines itself to securing to us the free exercise of our faculties, our faculties will be paralyzed?
44800	Does it follow that if we are free, we shall cease to act?
44800	Does it follow that if we do not receive an impulse from the law, we shall receive no impulse at all?
44800	Does it not lead to an abyss?
44800	Does not Mr. Louis Blanc tell us again that competition{ 45} leads to monopoly, and that, for the same reason, cheapness leads to exorbitant prices?
44800	For what are our faculties, but the extension of our personality?
44800	For who will dare to say that force has been given to us, not to defend our rights, but to annihilate the equal rights of our brethren?
44800	From whom is the State to obtain them?
44800	Have they not acquired their rights at the cost of effort and sacrifice?
44800	Have they not given sufficient proof of intelligence and wisdom?
44800	How has this perversion of law been accomplished?
44800	How is this argument to be answered?
44800	How will you place it under the power of your tribunals, your gendarmes, and of your prisons?
44800	How, in fact, can we imagine force encroaching upon the liberty of citizens without infringing upon justice, and so acting against its proper aim?
44800	In point of fact, who are the capable?
44800	In the one it was wished( by whom?)
44800	In what does the impulse that power gives to society consist?
44800	In what does this power consist?
44800	Is a legislator to be chosen?
44800	Is it any wonder that every failure threatens to cause a revolution?
44800	Is it for the law to make choice of one amongst so many fancies, and to make use of the public force in its service?
44800	Is it likely that it would compromise that greatest of advantages, the public peace?
44800	Is it likely that the enfranchised classes would be very jealous of their privilege?
44800	Is it likely that the excluded classes would not quietly wait for their turn?
44800	Is it to be supposed that Nature has not bestowed upon me sufficient imagination to invent a Utopia too?
44800	Is not justice right?
44800	Is not the law omnipotent?
44800	Is there a man or a class who would dare to claim the right of putting himself in the place of the people, of deciding and of acting for them?
44800	It is the following: What is law?
44800	Liberty of association?
44800	Liberty of labor?
44800	Moreover, every profession had a district assigned to it( by whom?)....
44800	Now socialism, thus defined, and forming a doctrinal body, what other war would you make against it than a{ 15} war of doctrine?
44800	Once on this incline, will society enjoy something like liberty?
44800	That competition tends to drain the sources of consumption, and diverts production to a destructive activity?
44800	That of the machine, which is set in motion; or rather, are they not the brute matter of which the machine is made?
44800	The Socialists say, since the law organizes justice, why should it not organize labor, instruction, and religion?
44800	The liberty of exchange?
44800	Upon what principle is this exclusion founded?
44800	We will give a quotation from Bossuet: One of the things which was the most strongly impressed( by whom?)
44800	What are its limits?
44800	What is its domain?
44800	What is to give it this impulse?
44800	What ought it to be?
44800	What sort of liberty should be allowed to men?
44800	What then?
44800	What will you do then?
44800	What would be the consequences of such a perversion?
44800	What would become of its dignity if it were entrusted to the disciples of Rousseau?
44800	What, then, is law?
44800	When does plunder cease, then?
44800	Where is the law to stop?
44800	Where will you stop?
44800	Where, in fact, does the prerogative of the legislator stop?
44800	Which are the happiest, the most moral, and the most peaceable nations?
44800	Who is to give education and tools of labor?
44800	Why are they prevented?
44800	Why is this?
44800	Why, then, does not society go there of itself?
44800	Why?
44800	You have the gall to call that fine?
44800	and that competition, according to Mr. Louis Blanc, is a system of extermination for the people, and of ruination for trade?
44800	and what is property, but an extension of our faculties?
44800	is more than probable, there will be a no less inevitable revolution?
40851	Is there any alternative,says this printer,"between an abandonment of the constitution and resistance?"
40851	What other form of government, indeed, can so well deserve our esteem and love? 40851 relying with perfect confidence in the Executive"--is this the language of the constitution, as it respects any man?
40851	218; amendment will defeat the bill, 218; shall the territory remain defenceless?
40851	453; all the evidence necessary should be obtained, 453; extraordinary resolution-- was the President clerk of the court?
40851	679; what evidence that the Intendant is not authorized by the Spanish or French Government?
40851	681; what is the state of things?
40851	69; this country not equal to support a navy, 69; how can such a navy, be manned?
40851	A question was then taken in the following words: Does the matter so communicated require secrecy?
40851	Admitting it, I asked then, and I ask now, with what propriety it could be used, even in that sense, in the resolution referred to?
40851	Admitting there was such a law, what could the House do?
40851	Admitting they could hold it, what security would they have for their commerce?
40851	After knowing these facts, will gentlemen have the hardihood to call this a hasty measure?
40851	Again, if such a Navy were created, how was it to be manned?
40851	Against whom they were to be employed?
40851	Against whom, then, are we to arm?
40851	Although they may differ in political opinion, as many of us do, is that any reason we should attempt to destroy their reputation?
40851	Although this all might be mere matter of opinion, would it not come within the meaning of the law in question?
40851	Am I so to consider it?
40851	And are gentlemen to be here accused for exercising the constitutional right of election according to the conviction of their own judgments?
40851	And are not the emigrations composed of such as require the prompt assistance of the law, to preserve among them regularity?
40851	And are not these men property?
40851	And are the maxims of experience to become false, when applied to our fate?
40851	And are the people to be told that this is a trifling question?
40851	And are they pledged for the payment of the public debt?
40851	And are they, therefore, in this House to be confounded with each other?
40851	And are we not in war?
40851	And are we to be told from the house- tops, that the only use of elections is to promote, not public good, but public mischief?
40851	And can it be justifiable in the eyes of men, who believe there is nothing so precious or important as national honor?
40851	And can there be a greater, a more patriotic purpose than this?
40851	And could a potent State be alarmed by the unfounded claim of a single person?
40851	And do the citizens of the United States, he asked, wish their First Magistrate to be placed in this situation?
40851	And does not the doctrine of our opponents prove that, at every change of administration, the number of your judges are probably to be doubled?
40851	And during the time that Holland was separated from the dominion of Spain, was war declared in consequence of any nation trading with Holland?
40851	And has England gained nothing by the war?
40851	And here, sir, let it be asked, why should a Government that means well, or is confident in its uprightness and ability, ever fear the press?
40851	And here, sir, let me ask, are not these privileges all that are necessary?
40851	And how can the truth of things which can not be proved by evidence, be determined by evidence?
40851	And how has he proved this?
40851	And how is it to be effected?
40851	And if granted, why not grant it without assigning reasons, as well as with assigning them?
40851	And if so, could any thing afford a more lasting cause for war than an act of this kind?
40851	And if the money is to be raised by taxes, to what objects can we turn our attention?
40851	And if they are, does that committee mean to impose upon this House, as upon the people of some parts of the Union?
40851	And if they can hear in them, can not the stenographers also?
40851	And if they could delegate the power of raising an army to the PRESIDENT, why not do the same with respect to the power of raising taxes?
40851	And if they have no objection, why go into a Committee of the Whole; which, if gone into, must be with closed doors?
40851	And if they violate the law, where can we apply for redress but to our courts of justice?
40851	And if this be important in the general course of things, is it not, under present circumstances, indispensable?
40851	And if to either sum, can we with propriety dispense with the internal taxes?
40851	And in these circumstances, said he, are the people of the United States to be led on from step to step, until they are irrevocably involved in war?
40851	And is not the tenure as completely impaired thereby, as if the other had been taken away also?
40851	And is not this most proper?
40851	And is the irritation consequent upon the laying of taxes worn off?
40851	And may they not, instead of giving their judges two thousand dollars a year, give them two hundred thousand?
40851	And must the Executive in every such case make a new appointment?
40851	And now that we have gained it, shall we fall from our honor?
40851	And on the question on the second division, to wit: Whether so much as provides that the third article shall be expunged, shall stand?
40851	And ought a man to be permitted to slander the Government and not an individual?
40851	And ought his descendants to be more hardly dealt with because their father had the generosity and magnanimity not to make the demand?
40851	And shall not we, as a nation, thank him for keeping us from a state of war?
40851	And shall not we, with our great and increasing resources, and the peculiar advantages of our situation, be able to effect still more?
40851	And shall we hesitate?
40851	And shall we now, when there is no right reason for it, lay hold of the public Treasury, and lavish away$ 14,000?
40851	And shall we, for this reason, monopolize a revenue upon it?
40851	And then, Is there a Seminary so near the spot contemplated, as to make it hostile in this House to encourage this University?
40851	And though we were a commercial Republic, was it not necessary to take care of the agricultural interest?
40851	And upon what terms are we to cope with the powers of Europe with respect to any navy?
40851	And was Rigaud punished by France for thus exercising his power or not?
40851	And was it to be considered, he asked, that they enjoyed the powers committed to them in their own right, as barons of empire, as sovereign despots?
40851	And was that salary, he asked, near so valuable now as it was when fixed?
40851	And was this, he asked, a subject of regret?
40851	And what are these cases?
40851	And what courts?
40851	And what have they got to do?
40851	And what have they said?
40851	And what object or consideration more pleasing than this can be presented to the human mind?
40851	And what objection could there be to the inquiry?
40851	And what was all this power that so much alarmed the gentleman from Massachusetts?
40851	And what was the object?
40851	And what will be the result of this?
40851	And what would be the remedy if he should refuse to comply?
40851	And what, he asked, did these expenses amount to?
40851	And what, in either case, would become of this boasted protection of the people against themselves?
40851	And when we all agree in this, whence the necessity of calling up the animosities of party?
40851	And whether help can be extended by law to the one, and consistently refused to the other?
40851	And whether it had not been in the contemplation of that gentleman, as well as others, to pay as much as they could yearly?
40851	And whether none of them in the Legislature never voted for the resolutions about the western land, nor about post- offices and post- roads?
40851	And whether the Executive is not hastening it?
40851	And who are the judges?
40851	And why is all this to be done?
40851	And why shall our judges not ride the circuits?
40851	And why were they told this?
40851	And will gentlemen act upon this as a sufficient reason for their conduct?
40851	And would any gentleman say it was not right to defend our vessels against pirates?
40851	And would any one say that it would be proper to rise without providing a military defence for the country?
40851	And would it not be extraordinary, he asked, if, before they received these statements, they were to appoint a committee of inquiry?
40851	And would not the opening of intercourse with such a place, by relieving the distresses of France, defeat the original intention of the law?
40851	And would this, he asked, be doing honor to the Republican Government?
40851	And would you take up arms with a millstone hanging around your neck?
40851	And yet, after being told of these designs, shall we sit with our arms folded, and make no defence?
40851	And, because Congress had a right to enact such a law, would gentlemen say it was for the benefit of trade?
40851	And, if Mr. Gerry had powers to treat, how could it be criminal to say that he might treat?
40851	And, on motion to agree thereto, a motion was made for the previous question, to wit:"Shall the main question be now put?"
40851	And, on the question on the first division, to wit: Whether so much as provides that the second article shall be expunged, shall stand?
40851	And, on the question on the fourth division, to wit: Whether that part shall stand which provides a limitation of time to its duration?
40851	And, on the question on the third division, to wit: Whether that part shall stand which restrains it from operating against former treaties?
40851	And, on the question,"Shall these words stand?"
40851	And, on the question,"Will the Senate advise and consent to the adoption of this article?"
40851	And, said Mr. G., do we really rely upon this?
40851	And, whether to deny it, in this instance, would not be to interfere with that provision of the constitution?
40851	Any thing to ruin the country?
40851	Are a majority of this House so degraded, so mean, so destitute of honor or morality, as to act at the nod of a President?
40851	Are gentlemen disposed to wage war in support of this principle?
40851	Are gentlemen then afraid to trust to the discretion of the President?
40851	Are gentlemen unwilling to indemnify for such losses?
40851	Are gentlemen unwilling to trust themselves, lest their own consciences should compel them to an act of justice?
40851	Are gentlemen''s opinions and language thus to be circumscribed?
40851	Are honorable gentlemen prepared to accept peace on such terms?
40851	Are not its members acting under a responsibility to public opinion, which can and will check their aberrations from duty?
40851	Are not the jurisdictions of those courts separate and distinct?
40851	Are not those who voted against it fairly to be considered as enemies to the law?
40851	Are not, said Mr. G., these papers important to the House?
40851	Are not, said Mr. O., the galleries constructed for the express purpose of hearing?
40851	Are our arguments to fly from the mouths of our cannon?
40851	Are our means equal to hers?
40851	Are there any words in that instrument which give the President expressly the power of removing any officer at pleasure?
40851	Are there words in the English language more explicit?
40851	Are these approaches to revolution and Jacobinic domination, to be observed with the eye of meek submission?
40851	Are they apprehensive lest he should communicate that which is improper?
40851	Are they not intended for the good people of the United States?
40851	Are they paid exclusively by the wealthy and the luxurious part of the community?
40851	Are they prepared to repeal the act to which I now refer?
40851	Are they willing to let it rest, and lose it?
40851	Are we bound hand and foot that we must be witnesses of these deadly thrusts at our liberty?
40851	Are we never to be clear of these alarms?
40851	Are we then to resort to the ultimate reason of kings?
40851	Are we to be the unresisting spectators of these exertions to destroy all that we hold dear?
40851	Are we to be told by the gentleman from Virginia, there is no occasion for this call; that we have information enough?
40851	Are we to form an exception to the general principles of nature, and to all the examples of history?
40851	Are we to legislate for succeeding ages?
40851	Are we to see all these acts practised against the repose of our country, and remain passive?
40851	Are we to suppose he is unwilling to inform us what they are?
40851	Are we to suppose the Executive has not been vigilant in ascertaining the circumstances attending this event?
40851	Are we valiant?
40851	Are we wise?
40851	Are you certain that they will wait the end of negotiation?
40851	As to the State which he represented, he would ask if the first blood that had been spilled after that shed at Boston was not in North Carolina?
40851	At a time when the enemy''s vessels are within our own jurisdiction, are we to withhold the necessary instructions to the commanders of our vessels?
40851	At that day, did we hastily go to war?
40851	Attacked and insulted as we had been, do we now, asked Mr. D., call for war?
40851	Because they have been once injured with impunity, shall we turn our backs upon them for ever?
40851	Because, as our opponents would fain have it believed, we are insensible to the vast interest affected by the obstruction of the Mississippi?
40851	Besides, has he the power to do so, in the manner then suggested by the gentleman from Virginia by taking possession of New Orleans?
40851	Besides, said Mr. B., were the rates of compensation, when first established, established upon this principle?
40851	Besides, said Mr. G., could it be expected that six or ten frigates could convoy all our vessels?
40851	Besides, what is the population of the Southern States?
40851	Bound to obey what law?
40851	Brought to this dilemma, said he, which side will you take?
40851	But I ask gentlemen to be candid, and tell me whether they are at this time equally divided?
40851	But an extreme case is put; a bill of attainder is passed; are the judges to support the constitution or the law?
40851	But are printers at liberty to tell lies about our transactions?
40851	But are we always to act by precedent?
40851	But are you not the guardians of the public treasure?
40851	But by what energy is the constitution to be destroyed?
40851	But can it be necessary to give this Senate any other assurance than my word?
40851	But can liberty, such as we understand and enjoy, exist in societies where the few only have property, and the many are both ignorant and licentious?
40851	But can you examine each distinct case?
40851	But could America lay up her ships, and say she would open her ports to all nations?
40851	But did the framers of the constitution stop here?
40851	But did the gentleman suppose that a war with France could be flattering to pride or ambition?
40851	But does this bill, said Mr. S., contemplate any such thing?
40851	But gentlemen say, where are your expenses?
40851	But had Spain a right to make this cession without our consent?
40851	But he would ask if this were the case, if it would not lead directly to war?
40851	But how are these objects effected?
40851	But how did the case really stand?
40851	But how did we vote on the motion for agreeing to the following clause?
40851	But how is that gentleman to have foundation for his reflections until a bill is drawn?
40851	But how shall we account for the exception which is now exhibited to this hitherto received maxim?
40851	But how was this law adopted?
40851	But how?
40851	But how?
40851	But if the evidence was not reported, how could he say that all the witnesses might not again be called before the House?
40851	But if the gentleman insisted opinions could not be false, how would he get rid of the conclusion?
40851	But if, on the contrary, they coolly looked into the petition, and reported thereon, would it not stop the mouths of these people?
40851	But if, sir, they have offended against the constitution or laws of the country, why are they not impeached?
40851	But is it unconstitutional to assign new duties to officers already existing?
40851	But is this Legislative power in Great Britain usurped by construction?
40851	But is this the peace which we ought to seek?
40851	But no, said the gentlemen,"We will not have it examined into, because it will make us out to be as_ black_ as the petitioners themselves?"
40851	But of what avail will this be, when Congress may take it away at any moment?
40851	But ought this to be said of the subject under consideration?
40851	But should we persist under such a possibility of mistake, what do we risk?
40851	But suppose it was now in possession of a foreign power, would Georgia attempt to drive them from it?
40851	But suppose, said Mr. S., this independence were to take place, would all the danger to this country actually take place which has been stated?
40851	But suppose, sir, you agree to divide these States, where is the boundary to be?
40851	But supposing there are yet a number of them, what better use can our public armed vessels be put to than to go after them?
40851	But the gentleman from South Carolina says, this is the cheapest mode of defence; but does the gentleman prove this?
40851	But the question arises, whether a violation of the treaties on the part of France is, of itself, sufficient for setting them aside?
40851	But this settlement is now objected to, and what is to be done?
40851	But was it necessary these persons should at once become entitled to take a part in the concerns of our Government?
40851	But was this the sense of the country?
40851	But were they always to expect to have a PRESIDENT who would give his services to his country?
40851	But what have we to do with their domestic broils?
40851	But what inducement will there be to moneyed men to lend money, except a permanent revenue be made the security?
40851	But what is the fact?
40851	But what security have we for the truth of the declaration?
40851	But what was all this to the United States?
40851	But what was now to be done?
40851	But what was the issue of this negotiation?
40851	But what was the issue of this proposition?
40851	But what was the result of experience?
40851	But what were the terms upon which they proposed to cede it?
40851	But what, said Mr. G., is the language of this section?
40851	But what, sir, did the gentleman mean by his X, Y, Z?
40851	But when?
40851	But where did that gentleman learn that Holland has no navy?
40851	But where is the evil complained of?
40851	But where was the blame, if any could attach?
40851	But where was the crime, the offence, or the impropriety, of the conduct ascribed to the Executive, if it had been adopted?
40851	But wherefore this exhibition of a zeal so inordinate as to arrogate to itself all sensibility to the national welfare?
40851	But who will say that the crew of a British frigate on the high seas, are within the peace of the United States?
40851	But why have they trusted to the imaginary collision of sentiment between the Governor and Intendant of New Orleans?
40851	But why is she in that situation?
40851	But why speak of British inhumanity, if not to embarrass this bill?
40851	But why was the army mentioned on this occasion, unless to fore- warn us of the fate which awaits them, and to tell us that their days are numbered?
40851	But why, he asked, do these men come here in a body?
40851	But why, say gentlemen, fix precisely one Supreme Court, and leave the rest to Legislative discretion?
40851	But why?
40851	But will it be pretended that a person can commit misprision of treason who can not commit treason itself?
40851	But will the House thus be acted upon?
40851	But will the gentleman say, that whenever we ask information, we conclude upon measures?
40851	But will this alter the justness of my position?
40851	But would this have been right?
40851	But would this have done?
40851	But, as this is not the case, as we are only asked to permit its encouragement, by allowing these people to receive benefactions, how can we refuse?
40851	But, he asked if the gentleman from Virginia knew the reason why this amount to France appeared so large?
40851	But, he asked if the loss we sustained for the want of a naval power could be estimated?
40851	But, he would ask them, if, independent of land with its improvements, they possessed any other species of property which could not be eluded?
40851	But, in any view, are the sins of the former judges to be fastened upon the new Judicial system?
40851	But, it is said, will you suffer a printer to abuse his fellow- citizens with impunity, ascribing his conduct to the very worst of motives?
40851	But, said he, shall we fear that we shall be called upon to pay a few more just debts?
40851	But, say gentlemen, where will you find revenue?
40851	But, sir, are the Secretaries unworthy of confidence?
40851	But, sir, are we not as deeply interested in the true exposition of the constitution, as the judges can be?
40851	But, supposing the law constitutional, is the crime an infamous one?
40851	But, taking things as they are, what course, on this point, is most fair and tolerant?
40851	But, to return, was there any thing criminal in that paragraph?
40851	But, upon what ground, said Mr. G., do the advocates of this report prove that 11 is not three- fourths of 14?
40851	But, what was the fact?
40851	But, why had it been so?
40851	But, why two, Mr. B. queried, rather than three?
40851	By the laws of what nation would the contract be governed?
40851	By what are those armies to be opposed?
40851	By what authority can any court render such a judgment?
40851	By what inspiration could the gentleman form a judgment now?
40851	By what law then would such a contract be governed?
40851	By what means was this to be accomplished?
40851	By whom has this outrage been offered?
40851	Can I, said Mr. J., represent as effectually Massachusetts, or Vermont, as Pennsylvania?
40851	Can any other meaning be applied to the words"from time to time?"
40851	Can any thing essential, any thing more than mere ornament and decoration, be added to this by robes and diamonds?
40851	Can gentlemen hear these things and lie quietly on their pillows?
40851	Can he commit and imprison without a trial?
40851	Can he prove that £10,000,000 sterling is only the third part of the expense of defence, as he says?
40851	Can he then be trusted with the government of others?
40851	Can it be any thing more than the right of uttering and doing what is not injurious to others?
40851	Can it be done without power?
40851	Can it be expected that any country will be peopled as fast, from a nation at the distance of three thousand miles, as our Western country has been?
40851	Can it be possible, sir, that the gentleman was really serious when he talked about an injury to women and children?
40851	Can it be shown, or even said, that the judgment of the court was a false construction of the constitution?
40851	Can it be, that an act, which, if perpetrated by an individual, would be robbery, can be justifiable in a nation?
40851	Can it have this effect?
40851	Can it mean that an office may exist, although its duties are extinct?
40851	Can it mean, in short, that the shadow, to wit, the judge, can remain, when the substance, to wit, the office, is removed?
40851	Can it mean, that his tenure should be limited by behaving well in an office which did not exist?
40851	Can not the logical talents of the gentleman from Massachusetts( Mr. BACON) distinguish between information and measures?
40851	Can stones show gratitude?
40851	Can the honorable gentleman be serious in all this?
40851	Can the usefulness or convenience of any acquisition justify us in taking from another by force what we have no sort of right to?
40851	Can this admission make us responsible for the conduct of men we do not know, and over whom we have no control?
40851	Can we expect any thing from their justice, or, rather, have we not every thing to expect from their vengeance, if not prepared to meet it?
40851	Can we expect this, said Mr. N.?
40851	Can you impair its force by impeaching the motives of any member who voted for it?
40851	Could any gentleman conceive that these were not too great powers to be intrusted to any State whatever?
40851	Could any gentleman pretend to say that no inference might be drawn from this source and the concomitant facts?
40851	Could any man desire to place the citizens of the District in such a state?
40851	Could any office be at the same time in the possession of two persons?
40851	Could any possible inconvenience accrue from allowing him to obtain the information he desired?
40851	Could gentlemen be serious in making this objection?
40851	Could gentlemen hear it and not shudder?
40851	Could he say we were at peace with them now?
40851	Could he use the public force to redress our wrongs?
40851	Could his successor, on the receipt of his commission, exercise the functions of judge, prior to the resignation of the former incumbent?
40851	Could it be necessary then to_ increase_ courts when suits were_ decreasing_?
40851	Could it be necessary to multiply judges, when their duties were diminishing?
40851	Could it then be supposed these gentlemen could, in this instance, so change their opinion?
40851	Could it, then, with any reason be called premature to act upon such information?
40851	Could the President proceed further, even if he thought more vigorous measures proper and expedient?
40851	Could the Speaker desire this?
40851	Could the framers of the constitution intend to guarantee, as a sacred principle, the liberty of lying against the Government?
40851	Could they alone go to war with France and Spain?
40851	Could they declare a law of North Carolina null and void?
40851	Could they fear injustice when opposed to a feeble individual?
40851	Could they hold Orleans, were they to take possession of it, without the aid of the United States?
40851	Could this be correct?
40851	Could this be liberty?
40851	Could this give offence, because we feel pleasure in being at peace?
40851	Could we refuse a tribute of respect to a man who had served his country so much?
40851	Could, then, gentlemen talk of moral obligation, and say that this was a just debt?
40851	Dangerous to Europe and to the world, what will be the effect of a great increase of that power?
40851	Did a nation ever make a declaration that it was not at war?
40851	Did any thing appear in the conduct of the French Directory to show that our Ministers were not possessed of ample powers?
40851	Did gentlemen mean that if we should make use of force against lawless violence, it is war?
40851	Did gentlemen want an age to express an opinion which every member feels-- which the whole nation feels?
40851	Did he carry his purpose into effect?
40851	Did he mean to set all slaves at liberty, or receive petitions from all?
40851	Did he not embark his all for this country?
40851	Did he then ask any thing which was unreasonable or improper?
40851	Did his constituents, he asked, wish this?
40851	Did not he know that the doctrine applied to the Senate as well as to that House?
40851	Did not our situation, and the circumstances in which we stand, compel us to turn our attention to this object?
40851	Did not the United States trade with all the nations of the earth?
40851	Did not the gentleman know that the most solemn decision had taken place last session on this subject, by a large majority?
40851	Did not the gentleman''s friends immediately state the impropriety of passing those resolutions?
40851	Did not the insolvent laws of the Southern States hold out the same allurements to fraud as the general bankrupt law?
40851	Did not the members of the convention know that a great quantity of public treasure would be drawn together into this place?
40851	Did not the silence of the bill on this point show the ignorance of gentlemen?
40851	Did not this go to sanction a report which was as false and malignant as even jacobinism could invent?
40851	Did the acts of cession by the States, and of acceptance by Congress, take away the jurisdiction of those States, and vest it in Congress?
40851	Did the city afford the Government a defence?
40851	Did the gentleman mean to insinuate, that this war was invited by the United States?
40851	Did the gentleman suppose that the number would be so great as to make a demand on their seats?
40851	Did the military send its aid?
40851	Did the people of America vest all power in the Legislature?
40851	Did the people?
40851	Did the petition go any farther than this?
40851	Did they attempt to counteract the Executive?
40851	Did they imagine that, without the expression of a murmur by them, the mover would himself rise and oppose his own motion?
40851	Did they know how far we would reduce the Army, the Navy, or the Judiciary?
40851	Did they not consider the number of persons attached to the Government worthy of the special regard of the national Legislature?
40851	Did they not hold them under the Spanish Government?
40851	Did they rest here the most important branch of our Government?
40851	Did they risk on these grammatical niceties the fate of America?
40851	Did those gentlemen consider what it was to deprive the country of a rich mine of ship timber?
40851	Did we drive them to the measures that made such immense expenditures of the public money necessary?
40851	Did we object to a syllable contained in this part of the resolution?
40851	Did we refuse our assent?
40851	Did we then hesitate?
40851	Did we then make war?
40851	Did we then wait for foreign alliance?
40851	Do gentlemen appeal to our fears, rather than to our understanding?
40851	Do gentlemen mean to decide at once thus precipitately against all indemnity whatever?
40851	Do gentlemen say opinions can be false which do not contain matter of fact?
40851	Do gentlemen themselves think that the persons, whom I see around me, ought to be trusted with such powers?
40851	Do not gentlemen know that our Government is in possession of testimony, demonstrating beyond all kind of doubt, that this is not the fact?
40851	Do not gentlemen know that peace or war is not in our power?
40851	Do not the people in this territory hold them as such?
40851	Do not we know that we may safely rely upon them?
40851	Do they imagine that any particular place can be assigned to which they can ensure a profound silence, and from which every person can be withheld?
40851	Do they mean to prevent the publication of their sentiments to their constituents and to the world?
40851	Do we not every day call upon particular officers to perform duties not previously assigned to, or required of them?
40851	Do we not hear of depredatory threats, and the mischiefs she has the power of doing us, urged as reasons why we should submit to her?
40851	Do we not know, said Mr. B., that he is among the persons proscribed by France?
40851	Do we not see the nation with whom we are at variance find quarrels with every country who is not strong enough to resist her?
40851	Do you not tremble when you look at it?
40851	Do you prefer peace to independence?
40851	Does any body expect any thing from the terrible generosity of the Great Nation?
40851	Does any gentleman on this floor know who confined him, or by order of what government?
40851	Does he mean to say that Congress did wrong in funding the public debt?
40851	Does he mean to say that the price of our liberty and independence ought not to have been paid?
40851	Does he remember when we passed this law?
40851	Does he wish unreasonable concessions to be made?
40851	Does it affect the case?
40851	Does it alter the fact?
40851	Does it embrace any point of fact on which a committee is to make inquiry?
40851	Does it follow, that a law is bad because all those who concurred in it can not give good reasons for their votes?
40851	Does it not rather appear as if they intended to alienate the affections of the people from their Government, in order to effect their own views?
40851	Does it not say that the agents must be under the Government of France?
40851	Does it result that we have a right to pass a law beforehand to contemplate such an event?
40851	Does not the President refer to them as important to enlighten us?
40851	Does not the power that cedes give up all right whatever to that which accepts?
40851	Does not the selection of the best objects to which to appropriate it devolve on you?
40851	Does not this look as though the United States are to patronize and support the establishment?
40851	Does not this manifest precipitation?
40851	Does not this show that the gentlemen themselves have not confided in the estimate of the artist?
40851	Does she not injure us on every side?
40851	Does such a commission empower one to exercise the functions of the whole in opposition to the opinions of his colleagues?
40851	Does the gentleman by this mean to give the lie to the Executive?
40851	Does the gentleman from Connecticut recollect the words of that decree?
40851	Does the gentleman say opinions can not be false?
40851	Does the gentleman wish to suppress the history of the political events of 1776?
40851	Does this mean, said he, that there are a majority of members in this House who must always be in the right, and a minority always in the wrong?
40851	Does this question involve an inquiry either into matter of expediency or of fact?
40851	Else why was the provision for exclusive jurisdiction made?
40851	Establish thus the dependence of the Judiciary Department, who will resort to them for protection against you?
40851	For by what rule of evidence could he discover and know what was really the writer''s belief?
40851	For fear of_ offending_ foreign nations we are not to ask or know what is our relative situation with such nations?
40851	For what do we ask?
40851	For what purpose was this great mass to be raised?
40851	For what purpose, said he, should they be finished, unless it were intended to man them?
40851	For what, sir, are elections held, if it be not that the people should change their representatives when they do not like them?
40851	For what?
40851	For when the powers and duties are taken away, what, let me ask, is left but a salary?
40851	From whence do they derive their authority?
40851	From whence, said Mr. V., is this reasoning drawn?
40851	From whom is a corrupt decision most to be feared?
40851	Gentlemen asked whether war is not approaching?
40851	Gentlemen catch at this; but what is it but an attempt to arrest the arm of the Government of this country, just when it was about to strike a blow?
40851	Gentlemen say, we are happier than though we were at war; are we at peace?
40851	Had Congress, then, a right to do any thing to bind the sovereignties of the independent States?
40851	Had any objection been made to the old Congress under the Confederation, that was federally organized, for the want of talents or integrity?
40851	Had not the citizens lived happily for a hundred years under the State Governments?
40851	Had she no navy in the American war, when with great gallantry, though with unequal success, she fought the English at sea?
40851	Had the public affairs been conducted with less ability than they are at present?
40851	Had they not an equal right to be heard with other petitioners?
40851	Has a great man reason to fear from a poor one?
40851	Has a nation a right to put these States in a dangerous situation?
40851	Has he any documents or proof to render the suspicion colorable?
40851	Has he heard of no commercial distresses, when violations so unprecedented have of late occurred?
40851	Has it been passed in a manner which wounded your pride, or aroused your resentment?
40851	Has it been the practice of this Government heretofore to break lances on the spot with any nation who injured or insulted her?
40851	Has the King of Spain, has the First Consul of France, no means of making such communication to the President of the United States?
40851	Have not the judges, in the same manner, been deprived of one of their offices?
40851	Have the French Government expressed any inclination to settle the differences subsisting between them and us?
40851	Have the Senate any authority to advise him as to the faithful execution of the laws?
40851	Have they not been wholly maritime?
40851	Have they not seen the letter of the Governor of New Orleans to the Governor of the Mississippi Territory?
40851	Have we a better prospect than that nation?
40851	Have we given our vote that we would not defend the free navigation of the Mississippi?
40851	Have we heretofore been considered as responsible?
40851	Have we not been ready to unite in adopting those measures which the infraction of treaties and our violated rights demand?
40851	Have we not heard this doctrine supported in the memorable case of the mandamus, lately before the Supreme Court?
40851	Have we not passed a variety of bills which gentlemen have declared amount to war?
40851	Have we not seen sedition laws?
40851	Have we not uniformly adhered to the principle that those who exercise power_ de facto_ are the only persons that we are bound to recognize?
40851	Have we not within these few days passed a law to prevent the importation of certain dangerous characters?
40851	Have we one common language, and are we united under one head?
40851	Have we such evidence as should incline us to rely upon it?
40851	Have you a judiciary system extending over this immense country, matured by the wisdom of your ablest and best men?
40851	Have you any thing to say in excuse or extenuation for said publication?
40851	Have you here the opportunities for valuable information which might be had elsewhere?
40851	Have you not done more?
40851	Have you not then established a new office by the destruction of the old one?
40851	Have you taxes which have been laid since the commencement of the Government?
40851	Have you, said Mr. L., no greater objects to engage your attention than whether this man or that man shall go out of your bar, or remain within it?
40851	He again asked, have we the means?
40851	He asked if our Government did not know that nothing was to be obtained here without money?
40851	He asked the decision of the question, whether, previously to offering his resolutions, the doors ought not to be closed?
40851	He asked those gentlemen whether the PRESIDENT had not a right to man the frigates, and if so, whether they should not be_ obliged_ to find the money?
40851	He asked whether any gentlemen in this House, who are so frequently called disorganizers, had ever broached a doctrine like this?
40851	He asked whether gentlemen did not believe the Executive had taken measures which would lead to war?
40851	He asked whether the United States might not as well lose revenue in the first instance, as put money into the people''s pockets to pay it with?
40851	He asked whether this was consonant to the principles of the constitution?
40851	He asked whether, where men wanted every thing, and were in proportion of 29 to 1, it was possible they could be trusted with power?
40851	He asked, what necessity for the exercise of power by Congress?
40851	He called upon gentlemen to say whether a temper of revolt was not more perceptible in that quarter?
40851	He himself saw it with concern; but where was the difference in crime between the French Republic and the Emperor?
40851	He should be glad to know where he saw the signature to know it?
40851	He then asked if this was not the very state in which we now were?
40851	He wished also to know whether it was intended that the Senate should declare that the publication was a breach of privilege?
40851	He wished he could see the breasts of gentlemen now glow with the patriotism which then animated them; but, instead of this, what do we see?
40851	He wished to know how a distinction was to be made on this subject?
40851	He wished to know what difficulty there would have been in defining the time here referred to in this bill?
40851	He wished to know what was meant?
40851	He wished to know whence he derived his information?
40851	He wished to know whether the House had not jurisdiction over this matter?
40851	He wished to know whether the people have not a right to say, if they choose, that the administration of justice is corrupt?
40851	He wished, therefore, to know what these unusual severities were which, upon our own ideas of Government, we could retaliate?
40851	He would appeal to the gentleman whether it was more honorable to desert his duty and fly a vote, than to act as he had done?
40851	He would ask the gentleman just up whether he knew any thing about the expense of a mausoleum?
40851	He would ask the gentleman whether that act of ours should have any influence on our situation with France?
40851	He would ask whether, in countries over which the Government had complete jurisdiction, worse things had not happened?
40851	He would ask, Was there any thing in the name of Government, if it operated in this manner?
40851	He would ask, could not an appropriation be made for the use of the Military Establishment in general terms?
40851	He would ask, how, under these circumstances, a jury could be struck in a federal court in that State agreeably to law?
40851	He would not deny that frauds were committed, but for this should the honest debtor be eternally fettered with his debts?
40851	He would wish to know what advantage there could be in giving this legislative agency to those States?
40851	Hence arises the advantages from public contributions; and would that House, he asked, refuse their assistance?
40851	Here Mr. C. was called to order by Mr. BINGHAM, of Pennsylvania, who inquired what the liberty of the press had to do on a question of postponement?
40851	How can the retrocession be made?
40851	How could any thing, then, be due to them?
40851	How could he know what part would awaken that idea of disrespect?
40851	How could it be fairly argued, because gentlemen desired to limit the duration of this law, that they were unwilling to defend their country?
40851	How could that little island( England) command such influence in foreign dominions?
40851	How could that share be estimated?
40851	How could the motion be necessary-- how be useful?
40851	How could they be collected?
40851	How could this be, when they had no right to be deprived of?
40851	How could this be?
40851	How could we say what our relation is, except we determine what is our relation with respect to the treaties subsisting between the two countries?
40851	How did the bankrupt law operate upon the planter?
40851	How did the gentleman mean to go, and how take peaceable possession?
40851	How did the matter stand?
40851	How does that honorable gentleman get his information?
40851	How does the gentleman from Virginia know what light this information may throw on the subject?
40851	How does the matter now stand?
40851	How is a naval force to guard us, which Great Britain can destroy, whenever she pleases, even in time of war?
40851	How is it to operate?
40851	How is that to be formed?
40851	How is the independence of the judge more affected by the one act than by the other?
40851	How is this question to be decided?
40851	How is this to be done?
40851	How long can we expect to maintain the other distinctive qualities of the magistracy of the two countries, when this sameness is established?
40851	How long is it since we have discovered the malignant qualities which are now ascribed to this law?
40851	How must they, then, get support?
40851	How progressing?
40851	How so?
40851	How then can this House meddle with that part of our property?
40851	How then can we commiserate with it as an unfortunate country?
40851	How then can we deliberate on this subject, unless we know the degree of probability there is, that it will be carried into effect?
40851	How then could it be expected that, at such a period, even the semblance of justice could be done to the subject?
40851	How then could the gentleman from Pennsylvania say that Holland has no navy?
40851	How was it terminated?
40851	How was this to be ascertained but by inquiry?
40851	How was this to be done?
40851	How was this to be done?
40851	How would this resolution then stand?
40851	How would you bear up, not only against the force of the enemy, but against the irresistible current of public opinion?
40851	How, he asked, would this operate?
40851	How, he would ask gentlemen, could this be granted, and yet retained?
40851	How, then, can the gentleman with truth say that we have deviated from the law of nations?
40851	How, then, could the respective States of Virginia and Maryland a moment longer possess the jurisdiction?
40851	How, then, he asked, could they make their observations on it as they had done?
40851	How, then, he asks, can we expect to protect our commerce by a navy?
40851	How, then, is the nomination of a Minister to be understood?
40851	How, then, was it possible to do without accredited agents to attend to our concerns in foreign countries?
40851	I ask gentlemen, what is there in the constitution to prove their signification to this end alone?
40851	I ask him how he would remedy this evil as he calls it?
40851	I ask you, Mr. Chairman, if any system could be devised more likely to produce vexation and delay?
40851	I ask, gentlemen, is it not unfriendly and wrongful?
40851	I ask, if you do not, by such treatment, put the Government entirely into their hands?
40851	I ask, was this a public treaty?
40851	I say, sir, these were her motives in agreeing to that measure; and did she not evince a magnanimous spirit by doing it?
40851	I wish to know if the establishment of this principle requires facts?
40851	If Congress can derive no solid benefit from the exercise of this power, why keep the people in this degraded situation?
40851	If Congress exercise exclusive legislation, does it not follow that no other body can exercise any legislation whatever?
40851	If Congress had not power to legislate on the African trade, then why did they say it was with a committee?
40851	If a man is to be subject to a prosecution for his opinions, what will be the consequence?
40851	If all these parties are agreed to revoke their act, I wish to know who is to dissent to it, or what obstacle can prevent its being rescinded?
40851	If an opinion upon a fact be expressed, and that opinion is false, scandalous, and malicious, ought it not to be subject to prosecution?
40851	If as a constitutional organ of the Government, where is the power given to the Senate?
40851	If from the cabinet, are we, the representatives of the people, to obtain it from him?
40851	If gentlemen are against finishing these frigates, why do they not come forward and declare it?
40851	If gentlemen were then wrong, is that a reason why they should continue to act wrong?
40851	If it was desirable, who could undertake it, who encourage it, like this House?
40851	If it were, why pass such a bill at this time, when it could not go into operation?
40851	If not, how could it be improper for us to seize the only moment which was left for the then majority to do what they deemed a necessary act?
40851	If not, what did all that had been said amount to?
40851	If nothing was intended but a mere incorporation, why not apply to the State that could incorporate such a body?
40851	If one person in particular has the sale of his debates to this House, will it not destroy the advantages any other can derive from it?
40851	If receded, what would be the situation of the Territory?
40851	If the House decide that the Government is bound to relieve in one case, are they not bound to afford relief in all similar cases?
40851	If the Intendant is to be controlled by the Minister, would he have taken a step so important without his advice?
40851	If the United States were to become underwriters to the whole Union, where must the line be drawn when their assistance might be claimed?
40851	If the debtor States were not to pay their balances, why settle the accounts?
40851	If the doors shall be closed, can not we still agree to the resolution?
40851	If the expense is to be provided for, how is it to be done?
40851	If the gentleman from Delaware, or other gentlemen thought so, why not combat a decision at the time?
40851	If the permission were once granted to one, would it not be necessary to extend it to all?
40851	If the sentiments were agreeable to the minds of the House, why waste our time to alter mere expressions while the sentiment is preserved?
40851	If the spirit which last session gave existence to sixteen new judges continued, who could say by what number they would be limited?
40851	If there was nothing improper, why should they fear to trust the Senate with it?
40851	If these expenses were to be incurred for five thousand men, what would be the expense of an Army of thirty thousand men?
40851	If these sentiments were true, why not express them?
40851	If they had not a right to permit it, whether they are not bound to prohibit it?
40851	If they had power, where was the impropriety of referring, at least that part which could be considered?
40851	If they have the right to punish libels, or false, or malicious attacks, why include them in this act?
40851	If they were to pay at this rate for overlooking the timber for one ship, what might they expect would be the expense of a navy yard?
40851	If they were, the only difference between us now is, what are the proper means to obtain this great end?
40851	If they will not say this, must they not allow that the constitution is positive in prohibiting any change in this respect?
40851	If they, then, were compelled to protect commerce, he asked if there was any other way of doing it than by a Navy?
40851	If this diversity of sentiment exists, ought not the evils under the judiciary law to be very great before we touch it?
40851	If this exercise were to be allowed in any case, why could it not be allowed in the present?
40851	If this is the case, and the House knew it, why not say so, and make preparations accordingly?
40851	If this reasoning is correct, can you repeal a law establishing an inferior court, under the constitution?
40851	If this were not the intention, why resist the amendment?
40851	If we agree to the resolution, do we not pledge ourselves to increase this force?
40851	If we are bound by the acts of the old Congress, are we not equally bound by those of the last session?
40851	If we thus give away the people''s money, said he, shall we not be charged with rapaciously putting our hands into their pockets?
40851	If you destroy all law and government, can the few oppress the many, or will the many oppress the few?
40851	If, said he, you incorporate men to build a University, are you not pledging yourselves to make up any deficiency?
40851	In a Republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important?
40851	In a court from which no one had an appeal and to whom it belonged to establish the leading principles of national jurisprudence?
40851	In a court, the judges of which are appointed by the PRESIDENT, by a jury selected by an officer holding his office at the will of the PRESIDENT?
40851	In making treaties he wished to know what was meant by two- thirds of the members of the Senate present?
40851	In short, does it appear that even Spain herself thought it an object of any importance?
40851	In what part of the constitution is it declared to be adopted?
40851	In what part of the constitution is such power delegated to this House?
40851	Indeed, can it, in the nature of things, be one of the rights of freemen to do injury?
40851	Instead of inducing them to behave better to us, had it not been with a knowledge of this that they have offered us fresh insult and indignity?
40851	Institutions for promoting it grow up, supported by the public purse; and to what object can it be dedicated with greater propriety?
40851	Is America, said he, arrived at this melancholy state?
40851	Is American character worth nothing, that we should thus, in my judgment, improperly, attempt to destroy it on this floor?
40851	Is a law that has received the varied assent required by the constitution, and is clothed with all the needful formalities, thereby invalidated?
40851	Is he a strict common lawyer, or a special pleader?
40851	Is he acquainted with chancery law?
40851	Is he bold enough to denounce this measure as one of the Federal victims marked for destruction?
40851	Is he prepared to say it will throw no light on this subject?
40851	Is it a license to injure others or the Government, by calumnies, with impunity?
40851	Is it a strange thing, I would ask gentlemen, for a State to grant charters?
40851	Is it at present for the public convenience?
40851	Is it because the Legislature may, at pleasure, set aside a treaty?
40851	Is it less expensive for individuals, or for the public, than it would be in some of your commercial cities?
40851	Is it necessary, when the whole nation is alive, to be moderate in the expression of our ideas?
40851	Is it not because popular opinion was called on to decide every thing, until those who wore bayonets decided for all the rest?
40851	Is it not before us?
40851	Is it not natural for the people to ask why Congress do not call for this information?
40851	Is it not rather a degraded state?
40851	Is it not reasonable, then, that an institution of this kind should be established in that place?
40851	Is it not time to gain information?
40851	Is it not well known that those debts were part of the price of our Revolution?
40851	Is it not your great duty to promote the public good; and can that be more completely promoted in any other way?
40851	Is it possible for any man to read the constitution with attention, and then suppose that such could have been its design?
40851	Is it possible that twelve thousand dollars can be necessary for the two Houses?
40851	Is it proper, Mr. N. asked, for legislators to be placed on this ground?
40851	Is it safe?
40851	Is it the design to tell us that its day has not yet come, but is approaching; and that the funding system is to add to the pile of Federal ruins?
40851	Is it the law of England, at any particular period, which is adopted?
40851	Is it then for this House to say they will not attend to the petitions of our citizens?
40851	Is it to be a river, or a line of marked trees?
40851	Is it too much to say of such a calculation, that it is a paltry calculation, unworthy of a statesman, and befitting only a schoolboy?
40851	Is murder prohibited, and may you shut a man up, and deprive him of sustenance, till he dies, and this not be denominated murder?
40851	Is no punishment to be inflicted on such a person?
40851	Is not this a strange situation?
40851	Is not this, said Mr. N., an acknowledgment of the effect which this law will have?
40851	Is our present situation calculated to produce this effect?
40851	Is such a thing possible?
40851	Is that a Government of laws which leaves us no security but in the confidence we have in the moderation and patriotism of one man?
40851	Is that a measure of general defence which has diminished confidence in the Government and produced disunion among the States and among the people?
40851	Is that formed by the constitution?
40851	Is that wonderful man who presides over the destinies of France, ignorant or unmindful of these forms?
40851	Is the creation of judicial officers the only thing committed to their discretion?
40851	Is the gentleman really in earnest in his inquiries at this time?
40851	Is the idea of a separation of these States so light and trifling an affair, as to be uttered with calmness in this deliberate assembly?
40851	Is the power claimed proper for Congress to possess?
40851	Is there a State in the Union which has not adopted it, and in which it is not in force?
40851	Is there an offensive sentence either to the Court of Spain or the Republic of France?
40851	Is there any condition annexed to the judge''s tenure of office, other than good behavior?
40851	Is there any doubt that we shall not stand in need of information when we come to discuss points connected with this subject?
40851	Is there no instance of a similar situation to be found in history?
40851	Is there not reason to believe gentlemen hope to conceal the full extent of their principles, by bringing them into operation only by degrees?
40851	Is there then nothing more?
40851	Is there, then, I ask you, any other mode for perpetuating the memory of such transcendent virtues so strong, so impressive as that which we propose?
40851	Is this House free from it?
40851	Is this a desirable state of things?
40851	Is this all our boasted acquisition, in return for the struggle we have made for our country?
40851	Is this an Address or an insult?
40851	Is this conciliation?
40851	Is this equitable?
40851	Is this fair, sir?
40851	Is this not calumny of the darkest hue?
40851	Is this not war?
40851	Is this system so very vicious, that it deserves nothing but abhorrence and destruction?
40851	Is this the case?
40851	Is this the language of irritation?
40851	Is this the mark of respect we ought to show to the first man in the nation?
40851	Is this the way in which six hundred thousand men are to be stigmatized?
40851	Is this to control succeeding rulers in their wild, their mad career?
40851	Is this wise?
40851	Is this, said he, a desirable state for the Legislature to be placed in?
40851	It is not want of respect that should prevent us, but are we provided to go into all the consequences attending a new negotiation?
40851	It is true, this place may be settled by foreigners; but can we suppose that any native citizen, who values his political rights, will come here?
40851	It may be said that you print your journals; but who reads them?
40851	It was a Judicial question, and the House ought not to pretend to determine the point; why, then, should they take up time upon it?
40851	Let me ask if this was not a vicious construction of a court of the highest authority and greatest importance in the nation?
40851	Let me ask, is there any thing in this calculated to gratify the courtly delicacy of a Castilian?
40851	Let me ask, sir, what could the judges do?
40851	Let me now ask, if the compensation allowed to these judges is extravagant?
40851	Let the gentleman from New York classify the claims as he pleases, can he tell the extent of the demands?
40851	Let the inquiry be made, of whom do the judges hold?
40851	May not equal oppression be imposed upon the people by giving your judges exorbitant salaries as by increasing their numbers?
40851	May not the same corrupt and unprincipled motive which would lead men to the raising of an army of judges lead them to squander the public money?
40851	May they not amount to five million or ten million of dollars?
40851	Might not sixty as well as sixteen, with salaries of twenty thousand, instead of two thousand dollars, be provided for in this way?
40851	Might there not be other applications?
40851	Mr. B. asked, would these gentlemen admit that Nash was guilty of the dreadful murders committed on board the British frigate?
40851	Mr. B. said, he would inquire whether the present salaries were a reasonable and just compensation for the services performed?
40851	Mr. B. wished to know to whom they are to be attached?
40851	Mr. BAYARD asked for information whether it was in order for him to state that he withdrew his resolution?
40851	Mr. BUCK asked if, when on the question on the resolution,( if, adopted,) a separate vote could be given?
40851	Mr. COIT wished to know whether it was necessary for the United States to intermeddle with this?
40851	Mr. DANA thought this a most extraordinary resolution indeed?
40851	Mr. DAWSON asked if these resolutions were not necessarily connected with a subject which the House had determined should be discussed in private?
40851	Mr. DAWSON inquired if the same rules that applied to the House, did not also apply to Committees of the Whole?
40851	Mr. GALLATIN asked whether he understood the SPEAKER rightly, that a motion for a reference to a committee superseded a motion for postponement?
40851	Mr. GALLATIN inquired from what document Mr. SMITH took his calculations?
40851	Mr. GORDON wished to know what part of the resolution the gentleman from Virginia was not ready to act upon?
40851	Mr. H. asked on which branch of this rule could the arguments of gentlemen be predicated?
40851	Mr. HARPER asked, if the report of the committee should not be agreed to, whether the resolution might not then be agreed to?
40851	Mr. HARPER had yesterday said that the impressments were few; but how were we to be certain of that?
40851	Mr. HARPER inquired of the SPEAKER whether that was the usual mode of proceeding?
40851	Mr. LIVINGSTON desired to know wherein he had attempted to ridicule the resources of this country?
40851	Mr. MURRAY inquired when the fire happened at Lexington?
40851	Mr. N. asked whether this bill did not go to the abridgment of the freedom of speech and of the press?
40851	Mr. N. asked whether we could ever hope to succeed in a plan of this kind?
40851	Mr. NICHOLAS asked whether it had heretofore been usual, in the case of a new House, to swear the members before the choice of a Speaker?
40851	Mr. NICHOLAS asked whether it was in order to abuse any class of citizens in this manner, and particularly since no motion was before the committee?
40851	Mr. NICHOLAS asked whether it would not then be in order to postpone the consideration of the subject?
40851	Mr. O. inquired if the House was ready to do the first?
40851	Mr. President, are we then to understand that opposition to the majority in the two Houses of Congress, is improper, is indecent?
40851	Mr. R. WILLIAMS wished to know whether the new census proposed to be taken was to affect the representation as well as the tax?
40851	Mr. R. said, if he had not, how was he to know whether it was good or bad?
40851	Mr. RANDOLPH said he would ask the gentleman from Delaware, whether he had seen any indisposition in that House to discuss the subject?
40851	Mr. S. SMITH asked if this were not the precise motion decided yesterday by the House?
40851	Mr. S. asked if this mode was not perfectly just and fair?
40851	Mr. SMILIE would ask whether the Supreme Court in such a case as this could be denominated an impartial tribunal?
40851	Mr. SPRIGGS said it had been inquired why the Legislature of Maryland could not have granted the commissioners what they now pray for?
40851	Mr. SWANWICK asked the gentleman what security there was in a peace with Algiers?
40851	Mr. SWANWICK considered the question to be to this effect: whether the debates be under the sanction of the House or not?
40851	Mr. W. LYMAN said, the question was, whether the House would incur the expense of$ 1,600 to supply the members with copies or not?
40851	Must it be acknowledged as the prerogative of that State to impose a Chief Magistrate on the Union?
40851	Must they hire a man for this purpose?
40851	Must we not judge of it by its intrinsic merit?
40851	Must you resort to Maryland for protection, and wait on her measures?
40851	No, said he, you have not: what is your answer?
40851	Now of what do courts consist?
40851	Now the question is whether, if the offices are abolished, those who filled them before they were abolished are entitled to salaries?
40851	Now what has the information desired by gentlemen to do with any such negotiation?
40851	Now when there were no services to be performed, what salary could there be allowed, or what retribution demanded?
40851	Now, sir, is it not our duty to consult our country''s interest, before we take this rash step, which we can not recall?
40851	Now, suppose in the French Treaty there were the same provisions as in the British Treaty, would this have produced payment?
40851	Now, what could possibly be in possession of that Department?
40851	Of any resignations of the office of judge of the circuit court, in order"that a salutary system might take effect?"
40851	Of what nature should these be?
40851	Of what use, Mr. G. asked, had been the reference of a set of resolutions made some days ago by Mr. SITGREAVES?
40851	Of whom shall your judges be independent?
40851	On the other hand, what do you see?
40851	On the passage of the law of last session, did we hear any protest against its unconstitutionality from the Supreme or district courts?
40851	On the question whether the Senate would advise and consent to the ratification of the third article of the convention?
40851	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
40851	On the question, Shall this bill pass?
40851	On the question, whether the Senate would advise and consent to the ratification of the third article?
40851	On the question, whether the Senate would advise and consent to the said additional article, as amended?
40851	On the question,"Will the Senate advise and consent to the adoption of this article?"
40851	Once take that step, and what obligation was there in Congress to remain here?
40851	Or could they say that no part of the 80,000 militia, ordered to be held in readiness, would not be called into service?
40851	Or does he believe that these events will be handed down in association with the bloody buoy, and Porcupine''s works?
40851	Or had the PRESIDENT set a bad example, by living in a style of extravagance and splendor?
40851	Or has he had time to examine whether that decree is really in force, or not?
40851	Or has not the invariable course been to seek reparation in the first place by negotiation?
40851	Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him?
40851	Or is it abridged by a law to restrain lying?
40851	Or is the judgment of this House so feeble, that it may not be trusted?
40851	Or was he the very leader of the band that broke down these constitutional ramparts?
40851	Or was the power placed in them to be exercised like other duties, according to justice and propriety?
40851	Or was there a difference of right, because Virginia, with its extent and population, could make more clamor than any other State?
40851	Or would it be proper to sit down, satisfied that our enemy will not invade us, though they see we are not prepared to meet them?
40851	Or would they be ready to forfeit the revenue arising from it?
40851	Or would you be bound to retain them, lest it should infringe a private right?
40851	Or, if they could, can they find time to hear and decide causes?
40851	Or, that there were in that case no measures adopted?
40851	Or, will gentlemen say it was their intention to place themselves in this situation?
40851	Ought it to be rejected on the ground of jurisdiction?
40851	Ought not the House to be possessed of all the important information in the power of the Executive to give?
40851	Ought not this person to perform the object, although the particular mode of using the means has not been prescribed?
40851	Ought our country to remain in such cases dependent on foreign supply, precarious, because liable to be interrupted?
40851	Ought they not, then, he asked, to devise some species of tax by which to draw some part of the revenue from the inhabitants of the back country?
40851	Ought they, then, to support the doctrine which hereafter may be practised on to the full extent?
40851	Ought we not to aim at harmonizing, instead of dividing our citizens?
40851	Ought we not, therefore, on such a subject, to take immediate means to gain information?
40851	Our trade became so insecure, that it was necessary to do-- what?
40851	Patriotism could not be purchased, and should they despair of getting a man to fill the office of PRESIDENT without they increased the salary?
40851	Perhaps he has formed from his own mind a proper selection for our children, and is against the press handing down any thing else?
40851	Perhaps he might be asked, if we were, then, to be left without protection?
40851	Put the case to its consequences, and what becomes of the check?
40851	Questions arise whether both descriptions of sufferers ought not to be provided for?
40851	Returning to the question of foreign political intercourse: Was it proper to bring it back to what it was eighteen months ago?
40851	Shall he, and he only, have the public ear?
40851	Shall it be confided to men immediately responsible to the people, or to those who are irresponsible?
40851	Shall oppressed humanity find no asylum on this globe?
40851	Shall the Speaker have the discretion of saying what debates shall be taken and what shall not?
40851	Shall then a mistaken spirit of economy, and a still more mistaken jealousy arrest us?
40851	Shall they obey God or Mammon?
40851	Shall we abandon our duty?
40851	Shall we repress truth?
40851	Shall we sacrifice the interests of our constituents to a sense of politeness to these gentlemen?
40851	Shall we send a Minister hampered by such a resolution?
40851	Shall we shut the door against individual benevolence?
40851	Shall we sit down contented under the imputation of lukewarmness in this cause?
40851	Shall we thereby invite her aggressions?
40851	Shall we, said Mr. D., because our seamen have been first injured by Great Britain, when France uses them still worse, abandon them?
40851	Shall we, said he, treat the citizens of Savannah with more disrespect than the people of St. Domingo?
40851	Should I be doing right, said Mr. G., to say that I believe that this section of the bill is an effect of that negotiation?
40851	Should he, from unavoidable accidents, be cast into prison, and his family reduced to misery and distress?
40851	Should we now say they should be at our direction, and that we would not grant money without?
40851	Since our treaties were always made by special Envoys, what advantage could it be to have numerous Ministers Plenipotentiary in Europe?
40851	Sir, after a declaration of this kind, can you retract?
40851	Sir, said Mr. R., whom does this infraction of the treaty and the natural rights of this country most intimately affect?
40851	So we are told!--But if there be blame, on whom does it fall?
40851	Still, if the gentlemen would not agree with him as to the unconstitutionality of the measure proposed, he would ask, was it expedient?
40851	Suppose Georgia had a title to this territory, had not the United States the power of depriving Georgia of it?
40851	Suppose a libel were written against the PRESIDENT, where is it most probable that such an offence would receive an impartial trial?
40851	Suppose a majority of_ one_ was obtained on the report, what end would be produced?
40851	Suppose such an alliance was formed, would it not be said that Congress are bound to carry it into effect?
40851	Suppose the PRESIDENT should, after this, appoint officers to enlist men for the frigates, how could the House refuse to pay them?
40851	Suppose the persons deny your power-- how are your committee to enforce their mandates?
40851	Suppose these taxes are removed, are not the products of the country increasing?
40851	Suppose this power is doubted?
40851	Suppose we go into a Committee of the Whole, what light can we expect from their deliberation?
40851	Suppose we pass a law which calls upon the PRESIDENT to act, what ought the PRESIDENT to do?
40851	Suppose you had no law at all, could the rich oppress the poor?
40851	Suppose your courts of law claim cognizance as a case of libel, are you to have two prosecutions and two trials for the same offence?
40851	Suppose your reliance had been altogether on this broken staff, and not on the elective principle?
40851	Suppose, as the gentlemen wish, we say we will indemnify, does that pay the claims?
40851	Suppose, said Mr. H., we were to give thirty thousand dollars towards this loss, what would it be when divided among the whole Union?
40851	Suppose, said he, persons should claim to be Electors, who had never been_ properly_ appointed, should their vote be received?
40851	Surely it would not; and is it not the duty of every good citizen to heal, as far as possible, the wounds of society?
40851	That he would be punishable for concealing a treason who could not be punished for plotting it?
40851	That the moment they throw off the French yoke, they will receive all the assistance from this country which a free commerce can give them?
40851	The CHAIRMAN asked what Message?
40851	The SPEAKER asked, whether it was the pleasure of the House that the Sergeant- at- arms should be sent for Mr. LYON?
40851	The SPEAKER said the question was, whether it should be committed or not?
40851	The SPEAKER said, then you do accordingly agree to this proposition?
40851	The United States intend to exercise jurisdiction over that Territory, and was there any more reason for excepting this jurisdiction than any other?
40851	The bill having been determined to be read a third time, the usual question was put by the SPEAKER,"For what day shall it be made the order?"
40851	The charge is easily made, but has the gentleman the means of supporting it?
40851	The fires at New York, Baltimore, and Charleston, had been mentioned; but what were the means of Savannah when compared with New York?
40851	The first inquiry was, whether the law of nations permitted the merchant vessels of neutral nations to arm?
40851	The first question was, then, whether that Administration had been marked with wisdom, firmness, and patriotism?
40851	The first thing he should ask was, Is such a thing desirable?
40851	The following question was then put,"Shall this bill pass?"
40851	The gentleman from Connecticut had said, why send a Minister Plenipotentiary to London or Paris, any more than the other Courts?
40851	The gentleman from Georgia had objected to the reference because the petition contained a system of facts which_ he said_ was not true?
40851	The gentleman from New York has asked, triumphantly asked, what power exists in our courts to deliver up an individual to a foreign Government?
40851	The law for authorizing the building of the three frigates?
40851	The only question is, How it shall be performed?
40851	The only question is, whether it will promote the taking of French privateers?
40851	The only question, said he, is, if your property is unjustly attacked, will you defend it?
40851	The previous question was then put in this form:"Shall the main question( viz: the resolution for reprimanding the offending members) now be put?"
40851	The previous question was then put,"Shall the main question be now put?"
40851	The question arises, by what tenure?
40851	The question before the House was not, Will we resent it?
40851	The question being,"Shall this bill pass?"
40851	The question is, what power is thus to be limited and checked?
40851	The question was put,"Is the decision of the Chair right?"
40851	The question was then put, shall the bill pass?
40851	The question was, whether the papers before them afforded reason to believe that legal evidence of the title did exist?
40851	The question was, whether they were to go over the same ground every four or eight years of furnishing the house of a new PRESIDENT?
40851	The second is, if further provisions are necessary, must they be made by amendment to the constitution?
40851	The simple question was, which of the two grounds the House would take?
40851	The true question is, were there courts enough under the old system, to do the business of the nation?
40851	The truth of these despatches admitted, what was your Government to do?
40851	The words are general,"all treasons, felonies,& c."Why are they confined in construction to British subjects?
40851	The yeas and nays were taken on the question,"Shall this bill be postponed till the first Monday in December next?"
40851	Then gentlemen get up and ask what we are to do with three frigates?
40851	Then why postpone it?
40851	Then, how could any gentleman say this was a trifling question, and one with which the House had nothing at all to do?
40851	These are my objects; do they not entitle us to the information asked?
40851	They certainly will not; for who would consent to sit here, or of what use would it be, under such conditions?
40851	They could appoint Commissioners to settle the accounts, but could they impose the debts upon the States?
40851	They might do, sir, for a tribe of starving Indians; but is this the rank that we are to hold among the nations of the world?
40851	This being established, the inquiry was, to what department was the power in question allotted?
40851	This being the case, he asked gentlemen which they would choose?
40851	This is, Shall the amendment be received or not?
40851	This was novel, and what result did it lead to?
40851	To calm those irritations which disturb its repose?
40851	To deprive them of the common right of participating in the passage of laws which all the citizens enjoyed?
40851	To remove all things which may alarm, torment, or exacerbate?
40851	To take a fair view of the resolutions, what did they amount to?
40851	To the Judiciary: What is the language applied to them?
40851	To what point, therefore, could these discussions lead?
40851	To what source, then, shall we resort for a knowledge of what constitutes this thing, called misbehavior in office?
40851	To what will not this dangerous doctrine lead?
40851	To whom are these appearances to be made?
40851	To whom are these services to be rendered?
40851	To whom were they pledged, and for what?
40851	Under all these grievances, what, said he, are we called upon to do?
40851	Under these circumstances, Mr. S. wished to know why their petitions should not be taken into consideration?
40851	Upon this subject, so very important, are they to be kept in the dark?
40851	Upon what ground could he found such charges?
40851	Upon what ground does the member from Vermont stand?
40851	Wanting wisdom and morals, how would they use it?
40851	Was a loan of money accomplished?
40851	Was any gentleman in the House bound to be satisfied, with the gentleman from New York, that all the facts necessary to be known were furnished?
40851	Was any gentleman prepared to say how many would be made?
40851	Was contempt the way to recommend attachment to the Government?
40851	Was every gentleman in the House bound to confine himself solely to the resolutions before the House?
40851	Was he forgetful of his duty?
40851	Was he to determine the point whether France has authorized hostilities against the United States?
40851	Was he to send forward to the seat of Government to be instructed what to do?
40851	Was he to stand still without making any attempt to avert the danger?
40851	Was it a circumstance which must ever be remembered with mortification, and which therefore will never be forgiven?
40851	Was it a desirable object to do away a great evil?
40851	Was it adopted by the courts?
40851	Was it announced to the President of the United States, in the usual forms of civility between nations who duly respect each other?
40851	Was it by the constitution?
40851	Was it conceivable that to her the place could be of any importance?
40851	Was it criminal to say that the Executive is supported by a party?
40851	Was it erroneous or criminal to say that debts and taxes were the ruinous consequences of war?
40851	Was it in his power to repel and punish the indignity put upon the nation?
40851	Was it intended by this resolution to charge the committee with inquiring into a breach of privilege as it respected the majority of this body?
40851	Was it not an order to bring France to terms by distressing her islands?
40851	Was it not as well to decide on this resolution in this committee as in any other committee?
40851	Was it not clear to every one that the country was going fast into a state of war, and( in the words of Mr. SITGREAVES) was it not to be expected?
40851	Was it not probable then, he would ask, that the PRESIDENT would proceed to complete those frigates, according to the power given him?
40851	Was it not to be supposed that contracts were entered into for that purpose?
40851	Was it not true?
40851	Was it not, therefore, prudent to keep a watchful eye in this respect?
40851	Was it possible, he asked, for a Government to exist, when this confidence was refused to one of its branches?
40851	Was it proper for this country, he asked, to turn its attention towards marine strength?
40851	Was it that the members of Congress were assembled on the banks of the Potomac, with Virginia in view on the other side?
40851	Was it the opinion of those gentlemen that the record was to be found in the charge of murder against that illustrious character?
40851	Was it the sense of that House?
40851	Was it warranted by any act of Congress, or by the practice of the State?
40851	Was it when three- fourths or four- fifths of a town was destroyed, or what other proportion?
40851	Was it, that one of the candidates was a Virginian?
40851	Was not every advance, on our part, for an adjustment of differences, met with new injuries and new insults?
40851	Was not such an opinion of things, he asked, calculated to induce France to believe that she might make her own terms with us?
40851	Was not this, he said, encouragement to put a period to that man''s existence?
40851	Was not, then, this spot become the permanent seat of the Government of the Union?
40851	Was official notice of it given to the Government of this country?
40851	Was that opinion then correct, and now false, in the estimation of gentlemen?
40851	Was the President of the United States the clerk of the court, to keep the records of it?
40851	Was the argument not in point; or was it the declaration of his own opinion, as he went along, that was out of order?
40851	Was the gentleman serious when he made this remark?
40851	Was the gentleman, sir, acquainted with the fact when he made this statement?
40851	Was the intention of the committee to have reference to the taking of free negroes and selling them as slaves, or the taking slaves to make them free?
40851	Was the memory of that great man to be perpetuated by a heap of large inanimate objects?
40851	Was then, he asked, a question of war a card of politeness?
40851	Was there any reason since to alter our opinion?
40851	Was there any thing in these men, he asked, that should prevent every kind of assistance being bestowed on them?
40851	Was there not cause for anxiety, when a nation, contending for the right of self- government, was thus attacked?
40851	Was there nothing, Mr. R. asked, to admonish us to take a measure of this kind?
40851	Was there nothing, he asked, which called for a declaration of the kind proposed?
40851	Was this decent or indecent?
40851	Was this defensive?
40851	Was this indecent in them?
40851	Was this indecent?
40851	Was this, he asked, the state of society?
40851	We are asked by the gentleman from Virginia if the people want judges to protect them?
40851	We are asked, why relinquish these balances before we are solicited by the States?
40851	We are averse to take up the motion of the gentleman from Connecticut, and wherefore?
40851	We asked if cards of hospitality were in the mean time necessary?
40851	We asked what had led to our present conversation?
40851	We have been asked, if we are afraid of having an army of judges?
40851	We may tell him of his wisdom and his firmness, but what of all that unless we connect it with his Administration?
40851	Were his nerves unstrung?
40851	Were not gentlemen any longer to express their difference of opinion?
40851	Were not the Detroit, and several other forts within our territory, held ten or a dozen years by Great Britain, in direct violation of a treaty?
40851	Were not the different departments, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, assembled, according to the constitution, in this District?
40851	Were there none of these judges ready to plunge their swords in the American heart?
40851	Were there not great doubts existing throughout the United States?
40851	Were they asleep on their post?
40851	Were they not, then, to be called upon for money to man the frigates?
40851	Were they so at present?
40851	Were they then to act as if the law had been repealed?
40851	Were they to go to war to avenge this partition?
40851	Were troops ever raised in a different manner?
40851	Were we to give up our commerce?
40851	Were we to suppose that the President had already taken measures to_ revenge_ the injuries of the United States?
40851	What advantage, he asked, was derived to this country from giving aliens eligibility to office?
40851	What an affecting spectacle had we the other day of sixty of these unfortunate men returning from Algerine slavery?
40851	What an influence can she command over our commerce?
40851	What are the reasons urged by the gentlemen to induce a different proceeding, an immediate appeal to arms?
40851	What are their duties?
40851	What are they given for?
40851	What are we to understand by this remark of the gentleman?
40851	What are we to understand by this right, given by God and nature?
40851	What avail our toasts-- our boasted recollections of him, and regret at his fate-- if we take not every opportunity to alleviate that distress?
40851	What but this compact-- what but this specific part of it, can save us from ruin?
40851	What circle would gentlemen fix the committee in to amend this Address, if they are not to give scope to these sentiments?
40851	What connection had we with the French Government?
40851	What could be more easy?
40851	What could have been the reason why Congress was to assume this exclusive legislation?
40851	What did the gentleman mean by avoiding the general principle?
40851	What disguise?
40851	What do gentlemen understand by"the freedom of speech and of the press?"
40851	What do the gentlemen tell us?
40851	What do we know respecting the cession?
40851	What does all this mean, sir?
40851	What does the constitution say?
40851	What does the resolution call for?
40851	What effect could a discussion have, but to show the world that there were_ parties_ in the House, and to raise a rancorous disposition?
40851	What fact?
40851	What had the President to do with the proceedings of that court?
40851	What had the States to dread?
40851	What has been our progress since the year 1763, in settling our Western country?
40851	What has the fact been?
40851	What have we to fear, suppose we interfere with that sensibility?
40851	What is his character as a lawyer?
40851	What is his offer to our Government?
40851	What is it that has drained the wealth of Europe itself into the coffers of two or three of its principal commercial powers, but a marine?
40851	What is it, that has drawn to Europe the superfluous riches of the three other quarters of the globe, but a marine?
40851	What is its nature?
40851	What is its purport?
40851	What is liberty of conscience?
40851	What is that crime?
40851	What is the abstract question?
40851	What is the ancient system?
40851	What is the consequence of one sovereign transferring all jurisdiction to another sovereign?
40851	What is the consequence?
40851	What is the fact?
40851	What is the implication of this doctrine?
40851	What is the inevitable deduction to be drawn from this fact?
40851	What is the inference?
40851	What is the internal and external state of this country?
40851	What is the object of the gentleman from Delaware?
40851	What is the practice?
40851	What is the present system?
40851	What is the probable result?
40851	What is the situation of the powers that remain?
40851	What is the state of things?
40851	What is the true and undisguised state of facts?
40851	What is there here that implicates the character of Spain?
40851	What is there then exhibited from the earliest period of our history?
40851	What is this encouragement?
40851	What is this population?
40851	What manifestation was there of the public will relative to the late election of a President of the United States?
40851	What may we then expect?
40851	What might be the consequence?
40851	What more does the gentleman wish?
40851	What more, then, can you do, than decide the principle which shall be applied to them?
40851	What objections could there be to this?
40851	What ought the government to have done?
40851	What power does a court possess to seize any individual and determine that he shall be adjudged by a foreign tribunal?
40851	What provision have they made to fulfil that intention?
40851	What right had they to exclusive seats?
40851	What saving, then, does he mean to make by opposing the establishment of this office?
40851	What should be thought of this, as taken in connection with the fate of the act and pendency of the Presidential election?
40851	What temper accompanied the progress of the bill in the other House I know not, or, if I did know, would it be proper for me here to say?
40851	What then was the difference of right between them?
40851	What then was to be done with them?
40851	What then, I ask, is the amount of this savage conduct?
40851	What then?
40851	What use can it be to take a step from which no benefit can be derived?
40851	What was meant here?
40851	What was more easy than for letters and instructions to be sent by post?
40851	What was the General to do?
40851	What was the consequence of this spirited conduct?
40851	What was the effect of this provision in the constitution?
40851	What was the engine now brought out against this freedom-- an engine possessed of all the powers necessary to ensure its success?
40851	What was the fact at Philadelphia?
40851	What was the fact?
40851	What was the language of the amendment?
40851	What was the language of the present appropriation?
40851	What was the object of the bill?
40851	What was the objection to this mode of proceeding?
40851	What was then the conduct of the French Government?
40851	What was to be done?
40851	What was to be the course of their proceeding?
40851	What were the arguments in favor of the warm tone?
40851	What were the committee to do?
40851	What were the consequences of our late negotiation?
40851	What were the embarrassments likely to arise therein?
40851	What were the people of the United States, and abroad, to think of this?
40851	What were they about to ask?
40851	What were we to substitute as complimentary to him in its place?
40851	What will be the effect if we have it told at our wharves that we object to man them, because we have peace with Algiers?
40851	What will be the effect of the desired repeal?
40851	What will be the effect on the Southern States?
40851	What will be the good of this?
40851	What will hinder them from arriving in the Floridas, and what can guard the approach from thence to our Southern frontier?
40851	What will you say to this?
40851	What would be the effect of this law on the inhabitants of the Territory?
40851	What would be the language, what would be the feelings of gentlemen in this House, were such an indignity offered on the Atlantic coast?
40851	What would become, in such a state of things, of the national debt, and all the banks in the United States?
40851	What would gentlemen have had the Government to do?
40851	What would they say if the Chesapeake, the Delaware, or the Bay of New York were shut up, and all egress prohibited by a foreign power?
40851	What, Mr. S. asked, would be the consequence of refusing this appropriation?
40851	What, asked Mr. P., was the ground taken at the last session, and acted upon at this?
40851	What, he asked, could be obtained by a vote on this subject?
40851	What, he asked, is the situation of the West Indies?
40851	What, he asked, was intended to be done with these armed vessels?
40851	What, he asked, was the letter which the gentleman read from his book?
40851	What, he asked, were to be the instructions given to the commanders of these vessels?
40851	What, he asked, would the world think of such a versatility of conduct?
40851	What, indeed, could such committee report?
40851	What, said Mr. B., is this present?
40851	What, said Mr. C., is the nature of the injuries which we have received from France?
40851	What, said Mr. G., are the inconveniences which would arise from a measure of this kind?
40851	What, said Mr. G., would be the degree of proof necessary to carry into effect this law?
40851	What, said Mr. R., would be the conduct of France, if in our situation?
40851	What, said Mr. S., is to be feared from the residence of aliens amongst us?
40851	What, said he, have they said to our Minister-- or rather to the person who was formerly our Minister, but who then had no power?
40851	What, said he, is most prudent to do?
40851	What, said he, is our external situation?
40851	What, said he, is the nature of the crime now proposed to be punished by the expulsion of the member from Vermont?
40851	What, said he, is the situation of the North- western Territory at this time?
40851	What, said he, is the situation of those countries which have gone into the establishment of large navies?
40851	What, said he, is to prevent Victor Hugues sending over two or three frigates?
40851	What, sir, has been done?
40851	What, sir, was the policy of America, from the commencement of the Revolution?
40851	What, then, Mr. Chairman, is the instruction which we may draw from this example?
40851	What, then, is substantially the nature of this appellate jurisdiction?
40851	What, then, is the nature of the amendment?
40851	What, then, is the rational, the honest, the constitutional idea of freedom of language or of conduct?
40851	What, then, is their aim?
40851	What, then, said Mr. D., are our hopes relative to France?
40851	When did the right of the President to recommend modifications of the Judiciary system cease?
40851	When gentlemen ask, What is the question?
40851	When it goes up to the Senate, may they not say they will not vote to finish, except it be to man them?
40851	When that very power from which we had detached ourselves, refused to carry her treaty into execution, did we then go to war?
40851	When the Indians were upon them, what could the Governor do?
40851	When the subject is sent to the committee with that instruction, can it be conceived that committee is forced to report a bill?
40851	When the term approached, the inquiry was, what judge are we to have?
40851	When was this jurisdiction to commence but at the period when the General Government should occupy it?
40851	When we reflect on a Treaty entered into on this principle with Great Britain, should France complain?
40851	When, too, the opinions of other gentlemen on fundamental points coincided with your own?
40851	When?
40851	Whence did he collect this information?
40851	Whence is it that the United States may abrogate the treaties with France?
40851	Whence now this change of spirit?
40851	Whence, then, the necessity of such appointment?
40851	Whenever we supposed the constitution violated, did we talk of civil war?
40851	Where could they be carried?
40851	Where is Italy, Switzerland, Flanders, and all Germany west of the Rhine?
40851	Where is the liberty of the press, which is secured to the citizens of the Union against Federal usurpation?
40851	Where is the man, exclaimed he, who will not defend his country and his fellow- citizens against such a decree?
40851	Where is the nation that will respect another that is passive under such humiliating degradation and disgrace?
40851	Where is the nation, ancient or modern, that has borne such treatment without resentment of resistance?
40851	Where was Hercules, that he did not crush this den of robbers that broke into the sanctuary of the constitution?
40851	Where was the gentleman from New York, who has, on this debate, made such a noble stand in favor of a violated constitution?
40851	Where was the_ Ajax Telamon_ of his party, or, to use his own more correct expression, the_ faction_ to which he belonged?
40851	Where was their security if the acts of these Representatives of the people could be to- morrow revoked by a power deriving authority from elsewhere?
40851	Where were these guardians of the constitution-- these vigilant sentinels of our rights and liberties, when this law passed?
40851	Where will you find men of nerve that will risk certain ruin?
40851	Where, he asked, is the difference between depending upon the French or British nation?
40851	Where, said he, are your sailors?
40851	Wherein have we differed from the compact made with France by our treaty made with that country?
40851	Whether he is in any way connected with the British Government, or not?
40851	Whether his ideas go to independence or not?
40851	Whether it is consistent with the nature of our Government, that a single branch, without check or control, should become judges in their own case?
40851	Whether so much as provides that the second article shall be expunged, shall stand?
40851	Whether so much as provides that the third article be expunged, shall stand?
40851	Whether that part shall stand which provides a limitation of time to its duration?
40851	Whether that part shall stand which restrains it from operating against former treaties?
40851	Whether the abilities of Government would be competent to meet all possible claims of this nature?
40851	Whether the constitution had not delegated the power of making treaties to other branches of the Government?
40851	Whether they would suffer themselves to come under the power of the French nation, or repel force by force?
40851	Which situation is it most for the interest of the United States that they should be in?
40851	Who are its enemies?
40851	Who are to decide between the constitution and the acts of Congress?
40851	Who are to judge?
40851	Who are to pronounce on the laws?
40851	Who can prevent that?
40851	Who can say that Mr. Gerry has power to treat alone, or that the French Government is willing to treat with him on fair and honorable terms?
40851	Who can show me in what other manner the same good can be effected by so small a sum?
40851	Who gave them the power to vest in any other authority than in Congress the right of declaring war?
40851	Who is so ignorant as not to know, that the imposition of a tax would create a hundred enemies for one friend?
40851	Who is to judge of the necessity or utility of these services?
40851	Who knows but the power in whose custody he is may expect America to interest herself in his favor?
40851	Who said this?
40851	Who shall fix the boundaries of these new empires, when the fatal separation shall take place?
40851	Who was it, that, in England, destroyed the Representative Government, and concentrated all its powers in his own hands?
40851	Who will confide in, who will be bound by their decrees?
40851	Who will declare whether they be unconstitutional?
40851	Who will venture on it; because, where will you draw the line?
40851	Who would withhold a few dollars from his purse to facilitate it?
40851	Who, said he, is the man who has this proof?
40851	Who, sir, I would ask the gentleman, are my coadjutors?
40851	Who, sir, proved fatal to the liberties of Rome?
40851	Who, then, are, in reality, the advocates of a limited authority, and who are the champions of a dangerous and uncontrollable power?
40851	Why are we told of the inconsistency of our means?
40851	Why can not they obtain this power which is asked of us of the State where it is wanted?
40851	Why combine it with considerations connected with negotiation?
40851	Why did they commit spoliations upon our commerce long before the British Treaty was ever dreamt of?
40851	Why do gentlemen tell the House of the danger of irritating France?
40851	Why do not gentlemen give away that which they have some authority or right to bestow?
40851	Why do not these"express acts of Parliament"change the law as to others than"British subjects?"
40851	Why do we hear of such things on this floor?
40851	Why do we want information, but that we may have a more clear view of the general subject?
40851	Why does the PRESIDENT communicate these things to us, if we are not allowed to express any sentiments about them?
40851	Why give one a privilege more than another?
40851	Why has he first learnt this offensive act from those who suffer by it?
40851	Why has this document been so sedulously kept from the public eye?
40851	Why insinuate that the Government had been wrong?
40851	Why is he thus held up to contempt and derision?
40851	Why is it now deemed requisite to abrogate the treaties by which this country has been connected with France?
40851	Why is it refused to the Federal Constitution?
40851	Why is the gentleman from Pennsylvania so very anxious on the subject?
40851	Why is this practice, hitherto unopposed, now to be broken in upon?
40851	Why lock him up there?
40851	Why not decide its other proportions?
40851	Why not furnish the American people at once with the real and the whole project of himself and his friends?
40851	Why not seize then what is so essential to us as a nation?
40851	Why not then restore the people to their former condition?
40851	Why object then, in a case where there was a difference of opinion, to refer the decision to an impartial tribunal?
40851	Why pass acts fitted for a state of war, without declaring that that is the state of the country?
40851	Why postpone it?
40851	Why prevent his being able to support his family?
40851	Why send him to jail?
40851	Why should a heavy fine and imprisonment be made the penalty for carrying on a trade so advantageous?
40851	Why should it not be sent there, and a profitable return be made?
40851	Why should the House trouble itself to sanction any particular work?
40851	Why should the individual members of either branch, or either branch itself, have more privileges than him?
40851	Why silent on the Legislature?
40851	Why such declamation?
40851	Why take it to a select committee?
40851	Why then divide it into little detached parts?
40851	Why then do gentlemen, who on those occasions approved of these measures, now despair of negotiation?
40851	Why then go into a committee?
40851	Why then put off the decision of a claim in his opinion just, and to which the House ought not to shut their ears?
40851	Why this provision?
40851	Why was that State to be selected out from all others?
40851	Why was the boundary of the United States always fixed at 31?
40851	Why were they silent till within a few weeks before the election of our President?
40851	Why, asked Mr. N., was this law originally passed?
40851	Why, he asked, did foreigners seek a residence in this country?
40851	Why, is there any crime in printing a minute of our transactions?
40851	Why, said he, shall we, who are a Confederacy of the Democratic Republicans, everlastingly keep our eyes upon the pageantry of Eastern Courts?
40851	Why, then, ask for it?
40851	Why, then, do gentlemen complain?
40851	Why, then, endeavor to stir up the feelings of the public against it by alleging it to be just cause of complaint?
40851	Why, then, mask his proposition?
40851	Why, then, refer this resolution calling for information to a committee?
40851	Why, then, rise for the purpose of referring it to a secret committee?
40851	Why, then, shall we proceed to measures which must inevitably involve the country in war?
40851	Why, then, should we hazard the being involved in European broils?
40851	Why?
40851	Why?
40851	Why?
40851	Will any gentleman say it is for our personal convenience that the seat of Government is now at this place?
40851	Will any man undertake to say, that the privilege of the Parliament of Great Britain ought to be that of the Congress of this country?
40851	Will any one say that a man who does not keep the laws ought to be allowed to make them?
40851	Will gentlemen look back to the histories of other countries, and then tell us the people here have nothing to apprehend from themselves?
40851	Will gentlemen say it is to be found in the force of this wise precedent?
40851	Will gentlemen say that the same liberty of writing and speaking did not exist then that now exists?
40851	Will gentlemen say they will pay all demands before they know any thing of their nature or amount?
40851	Will gentlemen sit here and shut their eyes to the state and condition of their country?
40851	Will he deny that this was a measure to which we had been urged for years by our adversaries, because they foresaw in it the ruin of Federal power?
40851	Will he say that premises and conclusions are the same thing?
40851	Will it be contended that such great trusts ought to be reposed in feeble or incapable hands?
40851	Will it be expected, that I should quote Sidney, De Lolme, Montesquieu, and a host of elementary writers, to prove this assertion?
40851	Will it be made a question whether it is proper to ask for information?
40851	Will it be said that there is a security to the freedom of mankind from the moderation with which this enormous power is to be exercised?
40851	Will it be said, that although you can not remove the judge from office, yet you can remove his office from him?
40851	Will it not be a declaration to the remaining judges that they hold their offices subject to your will and pleasure?
40851	Will it not manifest more magnanimity, more rationality, to abide by it until we try it; instead of taking up a pen and dashing it out of existence?
40851	Will the adoption of these resolutions give us a single ship or gun?
40851	Will the gentleman say, that the direct tax was laid in order to enlarge the bounds of patronage?
40851	Will the gentlemen say that these judges are ambassadors, other public ministers or consuls, or that they are a state?
40851	Will the judges rudely declare that you have violated the constitution, unmindful of your duty, and regardless of your oath?
40851	Will the present repeal of the internal taxes interfere with the doing substantial justice to our merchants?
40851	Will the same navy be more efficacious in our case, than in the case of Holland, or Spain, or Portugal?
40851	Will these resolutions, then, said he, if adopted, tend to this point?
40851	Will they not say the President has done his duty in stating the fact?
40851	Will they remedy the evil by excluding the stenographers from places within the bar?
40851	Will this Government not be chargeable with having assisted in detaching such a colony from its Government?
40851	Will this satisfy the just expectation of our country?
40851	Will we not be classed with the robbers and destroyers of mankind?
40851	Will you call the militia from the North to assist their Southern brethren?
40851	Will you give up commerce, or build a Navy to protect it?
40851	Will you not, then, be obliged to make a general provision that all claims, so circumstanced, shall be allowed?
40851	Will you remember, sir, that they held the power of life and death, without appeal?
40851	Will you secure their seasonable aid, bring them early to the fields they are ordered to defend?
40851	Will you then confine the President, in relation to these powers, to a Peace Establishment?
40851	Will, then, Mr. Chairman, any gentleman hesitate a moment to pronounce the rule of apportionment which was adopted unjust, unequal, and erroneous?
40851	With all the deference to their talents, is not Congress as capable of forming a correct opinion as they are?
40851	With respect to the motion, Mr. L. asked, to whom was application to be made?
40851	With respect to the price of salt at Fort Pitt, as a gentleman had observed, it might be high, but was this occasioned by a duty?
40851	With that meek and peaceful spirit now so strongly recommended, we submitted to this insult, and what followed?
40851	With this knowledge, so plainly derivable from the policy pursued by the Legislature, what was the Secretary of the Navy to do?
40851	Without meeting?
40851	Wonderful indeed is this sudden disposition to confidence?
40851	Would any gentleman say that it was policy not to legislate about 700,000 enemies in the very body of the United States?
40851	Would any man, said Mr. H., who shall read this passage, say that the system of these gentlemen is a peace system?
40851	Would any person deny that, through the agency of the Executive, constitutionally exercised, the injury was redressed?
40851	Would calmness be consistent if entering wedges were prepared to ruin the property of whole estates?
40851	Would conduct like this comport with the gentleman''s ideas of national honor, about which we have heard so much in the course of this debate?
40851	Would gentlemen feel calm if measures were taken to destroy most of their property?
40851	Would gentlemen say that the Executive ought to appoint persons to office who professed an opinion contrary to its own?
40851	Would he have had the people of the United States relinquish without a struggle those liberties which had cost so much blood and treasure?
40851	Would he march at the head of the_ posse comitatus_?
40851	Would he place the memory of WASHINGTON on a footing with that of a rich man''s mistress?
40851	Would it be more respectful that an answer should be sent by this House, which, for want of time, had not been sufficiently considered?
40851	Would it have been a proper return for the unanimity with which your committee was chosen?
40851	Would it have tended to conciliate?
40851	Would it not be absurd still to say, that the removed judge held his office during good behavior?
40851	Would it not involve an inconsistency, that ought not certainly to be chargeable upon the framers of the constitution?
40851	Would it not place the Territory in the situation of a conquered country?
40851	Would not public opinion be as ready to sanction the one as the other of these detestable acts?
40851	Would not such a procedure subject us to the just censure of the world, and to the strongest jealousy of those who have possessions near to us?
40851	Would not the French say, if they were applied to for redress,"You knew these were pirates; why did you not defend yourselves against them?"
40851	Would not the House have contravened the constitution, by taking from the President the power which by it is placed in him?
40851	Would not the people of this country think it their duty to destroy a power which could not be trusted; and would not foreigners despise it?
40851	Would not these two give to the legislature a majority?
40851	Would not this be a most extraordinary doctrine?
40851	Would not this be to acknowledge that there our regulation pinched her?
40851	Would not this be to impair the tenure of the office which was abolished, or to which another officer might have been appointed by a new regulation?
40851	Would such a procedure meet the approbation of even our own citizens, whose lives and fortunes would be risked in the conflict?
40851	Would the civil jurisdiction of the town have repelled the bayonet?
40851	Would the committee be willing that Savannah should be erased from the revenue?
40851	Would the decree stop the importation of British goods?
40851	Would the gentleman yet wish to leave the District without laws, and merely lest it should take away their suffrage?
40851	Would the gentleman, then, inform the House what point he wished to ascertain, or in what he expected additional proof?
40851	Would there be a power in Virginia and Maryland, if receded, to prevent a resumption?
40851	Would they admit that he falsely made the claim?
40851	Would they discard the property of that class of citizens who depended upon it for their support and their wealth?
40851	Would they not laugh at you when you told them their term of office was out?
40851	Would they not say, in the language of the gentleman from New York, though the law that creates us is temporary, we are in by the constitution?
40851	Would they not say, we belong to inferior courts?
40851	Would this be the way to keep the Government together, or to preserve harmony in the country?
40851	Would you annihilate a system because some men under part of it had acted wrong?
40851	Would you know the sentiment of England?
40851	Would your national honor be free from imputation by a conduct of such inconsistency and duplicity?
40851	Yes, he would answer; else how could an appropriation in general terms have been made for the intercourse with foreign nations?
40851	Yes, sir, we wish for peace; but how is that blessing to be preserved?
40851	Yet, what superior advantage have they in the Government generally?
40851	You are to inquire how he became possessed of a certain bill which he published; what kind of an inquiry is this?
40851	Your press might have been enchained till doomsday, your citizens incarcerated for life, and where is your remedy?
40851	[ Mr. ALLEN exclaimed, who said it?]
40851	[ Mr. HARPER asked if there was any question before the committee?]
40851	[ Mr. OTIS asked who were to be the judges?]
40851	[ Mr. RUTLEDGE asked whether this had been done?
40851	and are not our resources increasing with our population?
40851	and asking those whose duty it was to inquire, is there no sedition here?
40851	and did he not see that that would be a check upon the abuse of it in either House, since it was a weapon which both could use?
40851	and have we not done all we can conveniently do for the defence of our commerce?
40851	and if the effect of his resolution should be to show that the stipulations are injurious to our rights, would he know how to act?
40851	and in what cases they were to defend themselves?
40851	and of course are we not prohibited from establishing one system in one place, and a different system in another?
40851	and that however flagrant that abuse of power, it is remediless, and must be submitted to?
40851	and whether, if they do say so, the fact ought not to be inquired into?
40851	and will you punish every man who shall repeat, print, or publish what is made public on this floor?
40851	and, if Congress had that cognizance before that time, have those amendments taken it away?
40851	asked, could be placed in a nation which one day makes a treaty, and the next violates it?
40851	but I do not think it is any evil; would he have these people turned out in the United States to ravage, murder, and commit every species of crime?
40851	conquer France?
40851	did the Government say it?
40851	for money from the poor without law?
40851	is it no crime to publish a bill while before this House?
40851	is it possible that I have heard such a sentiment in this body?
40851	on the duties which he now pays?
40851	on what did this claim rest?
40851	or a murder committed on board such a frigate, against the peace of any other than the British Government?
40851	or in a court independent of any influence whatever?
40851	or what connection had we with, any other, besides commercial?
40851	or, Thirdly, whether they can be made by law?
40851	said Mr. S., would it be to carry humility in his front to say,"I come to place you on the same footing with the most favored nation?"
40851	said he, can it be supposed that three frigates would give us that ridiculous kind of spirit which would induce us at any rate to go to war?
40851	to collect it; but what was twenty- five compared with three hundred per cent.?
40851	was it not enough to submit to injury; shall we not only receive the stripes, but kiss the rod that inflicts them?
40851	with restrictions, perhaps, to guard against the fraudulent usurpation of our flag?
40499	If it should be the judgment of Congress that it would be most expedient--what can be more explicit than this language?
40499	In this case, shall a secure port be stipulated, and the pecuniary and honorary considerations granted?
40499	--The question, I apprehend, is whether we will take the petition up for a second reading, and not whether it shall be committed?
40499	112; difficult to see where the danger lies, 112; what is meant by responsibility?
40499	116; is five thousand dollars in proportion to the services of the Vice President?
40499	197; can two parties exist in a well organized government to dispute about property and have no judge?
40499	197; is not the want of consideration a good plea?
40499	230; plans of the friends of emancipation, 231; negroes are inferior race, 231; slavery is no new thing, 231; does slavery weaken the Southern States?
40499	231; is public opinion against slavery?
40499	232; this squeamishness is very extraordinary, 232; consequences of emancipation, 233; if importation prohibited, will that species become extinct?
40499	233; does slavery vitiate and debase the mind of the owner?
40499	233; does toleration of slavery bring reproach on America?
40499	233; will the abolition strengthen South Carolina?
40499	234; was South Carolina wanting in patriotism?
40499	318; peace concluded April, 1783, 318; what was the intention of the parties in this contract?
40499	318; what does the law of nations say?
40499	318; when did the war end?
40499	324; is it expedient to do it?
40499	59; what are the objects of Government-- revenue one of the first?
40499	647; view of legislative and treaty- making powers, 648; how is the will of the people expressed in the constitution to be understood?
40499	676; is it paramount to a law, and can it repeal law, although itself can not be acted upon by the legislative power?
40499	89; the power of removal exists somewhere, and where?
40499	A Treaty is a bargain between nations binding in good faith; and what makes a bargain?
40499	A gentleman has asked, what is meant by responsibility?
40499	A gentleman has said, that Parliament interfered, not to violate, but to perfect the contract: but what did Parliament do?
40499	A sufficient force must be raised for their defence; and the only question now to be considered is, what that force shall be?
40499	AMES.--I wish the committee may consider, with the attention the subject demands, whether the duties are too high or not?
40499	AMES.--If we are to go to war, will it not be a prodigious saving of expense to have all matters ready beforehand?
40499	After a silence of some minutes, Mr. LIVERMORE asked, what part of the report it was expected that gentlemen should speak to?
40499	After all, however, should the unlimited powers he had mentioned( and such powers must always be unlimited) be wantonly abused, was there no remedy?
40499	After having thus formed his opinion relative to the Treaty, his next inquiry was, is the Treaty constitutional?
40499	After these preliminary observations, Mr. H. proceeded to inquire, not what ought to be, but what was the Constitution of the United States?
40499	Again, what may be the result of the precedent relating to the session of Congress?
40499	Also, gentlemen declared they would not recede from their former determinations; did they expect that the majority would recede?
40499	And On the previous question,"Shall the said main question be now put?"
40499	And although the excise may be somewhat unpopular, although money may still be wanted; what is the excise?
40499	And are we( said Mr. S.) to stand up here, and tell the world that we dare not perform an act of benevolence?
40499	And are we, meanwhile, to remain inactive and irresolute, and make no efforts to repel their intended attacks?
40499	And between the Vice President and the Senate?
40499	And can an act possibly meet the disapprobation of a single person which does not infringe his rights, and which puts money into his pocket?
40499	And can not he infuse his dangerous and specious arguments and information into them as well in the closet, as by a public and official communication?
40499	And can we be so unreasonable as to suppose that they would ever consent to a Treaty that had not such terms of reciprocity?
40499	And demanded, if, by the purchase, they were divested of that quality?
40499	And did the United States pass laws to punish the counterfeiting the notes of that bank?
40499	And do not all those nations, as well as every other, come into our ports on the same terms with the British?
40499	And do we, in the last case, say to these unfortunate sufferers, commence suits against those who have injured you?
40499	And does not the constitution expressly declare that the House solely shall exercise the power of originating revenue bills?
40499	And had all their professions been only a veil to hide their love of power?
40499	And had the prosecution succeeded, would the Secretary have had an appeal to the public?
40499	And have we not the volunteers, sir, in this country to protect our rights?
40499	And here he would inquire if the Codorus Creek, which runs through Yorktown into the Susquehanna, was, or could be made navigable?
40499	And how can you discriminate such claims from those rising from savage depredations on your frontier settlers?
40499	And how would it be relished by them?
40499	And if they are given up, how are we to form seamen to man our future navy?
40499	And if war had been the consequence, how were we to have recovered the amount of the spoliations committed on the property of our merchants?
40499	And if, of right, they can carry these into effect, will they regard the means, though they be expressly pointed out?
40499	And if, under these circumstances, abused, would the injury be more tolerable?
40499	And is it not a principle that taxation and representation ought to go hand and hand?
40499	And is it not strange?
40499	And is not the sum now proposed more than either the first or last holder, till within these few days, supposed would be paid him?
40499	And is not the sum now proposed, more than either the first or last assignee ever contemplated, till within a few days past, would ever be paid him?
40499	And is this indiscriminate charge, without the least respect to characters, a decent or a just return for a conduct like this?
40499	And on the previous question,"Shall the main question be now put?"
40499	And on the previous question,"Shall the said main question be now put?"
40499	And on the question, Shall the main question be now put?
40499	And on the question, shall the main question be now put?
40499	And pray, sir, what in the world is equal to it?
40499	And shall we now hesitate, and tamely suffer them to dictate to us?
40499	And the question was then put, Shall this bill be rejected?
40499	And then the main question being put, Do the House agree to the said third resolution, as reported by the Committee of the whole House?
40499	And then the main question,"That the House do agree to the said resolution?"
40499	And to guard herself against such measures, may we not expect she will lay her hand upon all our property on the ocean?
40499	And were they not partial ministers of their own acknowledged principles?
40499	And were they to judge for the whole Continent?
40499	And what might not be the consequence of their awakening from their lethargy?
40499	And what must be their astonishment when they hear that some people amongst us think that Great Britain has conferred no favor upon us by doing it?
40499	And what was the slender basis on which the presumption was built?
40499	And what, sir, would otherwise be the result?
40499	And whether certain tracts of land should be reserved by Congress for certain purposes?
40499	And whom, sir, do we mean to gratify?
40499	And why depend on Portugal?
40499	And why, let me ask, shall we go and fix upon the banks of a rapid river, when we can have a more healthful situation?
40499	And will the enemy wait till they can be collected?
40499	And would gentlemen say that the negotiation had not been attended with beneficial consequences to this country?
40499	And would not this be a greater advantage to the United States than if they went up the rivers St. Lawrence or Mississippi, and paid no duty?
40499	And, after he had employed an agent to make a contract, with full discretion, and he had in pursuance of his authority made it, was it not binding?
40499	And, if we have, are we not to make use of it in judging of the expediency or inexpediency of the Treaty?
40499	And, secondly, Were there 60,000 inhabitants in the Territory?
40499	And, secondly, will such a construction warrant the establishment of the Bank?
40499	Are Republicans irresponsible?
40499	Are crimes more frequent in that country than in the other States?
40499	Are crimes more frequently committed there?
40499	Are despots alone to be reproached for unfeeling indifference to the tears and blood of their subjects?
40499	Are gentlemen afraid to leave them to their own unbiased judgment?
40499	Are gentlemen apprehensive we shall be led by this officer to adopt plans we should otherwise reject?
40499	Are not the annual revenues sufficient?
40499	Are not their capitals for trade larger than ours?
40499	Are our debts ascertained?
40499	Are taxes to be paid exclusively by the rich?
40499	Are the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate Congress?
40499	Are the eastern members to dictate in this business, and fix the seat of Government of the United States?
40499	Are the posts to remain for ever in the possession of Great Britain?
40499	Are the services of the Senate of more importance than those of the Representatives?
40499	Are the truths in it applicable to the great object we are about to decide?
40499	Are the very clods where we tread entitled to this ardent preference because they are greener?
40499	Are there more executions?
40499	Are these the men, asked Mr. C., who ought to have all this mass of Congressional odium cast upon them?
40499	Are they amenable to the people for their conduct?
40499	Are they not a polished people, sensible of the rights of mankind, and actuated by proper sentiments of humanity?
40499	Are they not continuing to do so, and is it not in contemplation to sell large quantities of lands in that country, that have never been purchased?
40499	Are they the men to swallow their resentments, who so lately were choking with them?
40499	Are they the only people whose feelings are to be consulted on this occasion?
40499	Are they the only persons who possess religion and morality?
40499	Are they to look into another bill for that purpose?
40499	Are they, for the stealing of a horse, or some such thing, to cross the line in armed bodies, and act just as they please?
40499	Are we afraid that the President and Senate are not sufficiently informed to know their respective duties?
40499	Are we never to stand upon a certain and solid foundation?
40499	Are we not now sitting, in our sober discretion, a General Government, without the semblance of restraint?
40499	Are we not so deeply in debt as to give us reason to believe that it will require many years to emancipate ourselves?
40499	Are we not the sole judges; have we not a right to determine for ourselves?
40499	Are we sure that it will come back into our possession again?
40499	Are we to apply to foreign banks or individuals?
40499	Are we to apply to the banks already established in the States for loans?
40499	Are we to depend, then, on taxes for commanding money in cases of urgent necessity?
40499	Are we to say, we will not be bound by your transfer, we will not treat with your representative, but insist upon a resettlement with you alone?
40499	Are we to send a special committee to inform them?
40499	Are we to take the circuitous route of impeachment?
40499	Are you prepared to do so just now?
40499	Are you ready to answer?
40499	Are you ready to speak in your defence?
40499	As to the flag, how can it require an answer from the Senate?
40499	As to the third point, should not his estate be indemnified?
40499	BOUDINOT.--The question seems to turn merely on this point, whether the Vice President shall receive a per diem allowance, or an annual salary?
40499	Be it so-- what follows?
40499	Besides, where will this business of censorship end?
40499	But I ask gentlemen, whether Great Britain ever laid such a high duty in the first instance, as we are about to impose?
40499	But I would ask if there is any power under heaven which could not be exercised within the extensive limits of this preamble?
40499	But a distrust of the States is shown in every movement of Congress-- will not this implant distrust also in the States?
40499	But admitting that they would not fight, to what would the argument lead?
40499	But am I reduced to the necessity of proving this point?
40499	But are not gentlemen who come from the most distant parts of the Union, compelled to relinquish every thing to attend here?
40499	But are, he asked, gentlemen serious in these observations?
40499	But can public necessity be urged in the present case to justify this kind of political robbery?
40499	But did all this put an end to the war?
40499	But did they want to bring forward an impeachment?
40499	But do gentlemen consider the consequences of throwing all internal defence and distant expeditions upon the militia?
40499	But from which of these measures is danger to be apprehended?
40499	But gentlemen say,"Have we not as much power as the House of Commons in Great Britain?"
40499	But he asked, if such would not be a vain attempt?
40499	But he would ask those gentlemen, by whom the Government was to be dissolved?
40499	But how do gentlemen handle this question?
40499	But how does Congress get this power?
40499	But how does it interpose and compel?
40499	But how is it they are more concerned in this business than others?
40499	But how will you prevent them?
40499	But if it be partial or oppressive, are there not many instances in which we have laid taxes of this nature?
40499	But if it was politic to lay an impost on cordage, would it not be the same with regard to hemp?
40499	But if this were doubtful, where should they look for information?
40499	But if you have two hands, both in the fire at once, will you pull out one before the other?
40499	But is Congress going to legislate by strength of arm?
40499	But is not the Secretary of the Treasury subject to blame?
40499	But is there occasion for amendments to the Treaty- making power?
40499	But is this the case of the domestic creditor of the United States?
40499	But it is asked, if this Treaty be so unfavorable to commerce, why are the merchants so much in favor of it?
40499	But it may be demanded, how are the frontiers to be protected, if the army was disbanded?
40499	But it might be objected that a power so enormous, and comprehending such essential interests, might be abused, and thence asked, where is the remedy?
40499	But let me ask, will not this as effectually destroy some parts, as if the correction had been made by way of incorporation?
40499	But on what are a committee to confer?
40499	But suppose they decline doing what you require, what is next to be done?
40499	But supposing it to be done away, how do the constitutions of the different States stand on this head?
40499	But the question is, what is that will, as expressed in the constitution?
40499	But was South Carolina, at the commencement of the war, with all her slaves, backward in her resistance to Great Britain?
40499	But was there no justice also due to the people of the United States?
40499	But was this done by striking out and inserting other words in the great charter?
40499	But were there no other ways of cancelling a Treaty?
40499	But what are their immediate representatives to do, in case the bill be made perpetual?
40499	But what did he do?
40499	But what did the gentlemen who have delivered their sentiments say?
40499	But what does this signify?
40499	But what effect do these men suppose will arise from their exertions?
40499	But what funds are to defray the increased expense of maintaining such a force as is now contemplated?
40499	But what has been the practice?
40499	But what has been the result of the system which has been pursued ever since?
40499	But what has the House to do with this; or why should it become the censor and promulgator of the speeches of its own members?
40499	But what have been the fruits of it?
40499	But what have the citizens of the other States to do with our slaves?
40499	But what is a law?
40499	But what is the necessity of having a numerous representation?
40499	But what is the object of the motion?
40499	But what is the objection?
40499	But what is this general welfare?
40499	But what is this liberty which some appear to be so fond of?
40499	But what is to prevent the greatest imposition in this business?
40499	But what more can we do than pass a law for the purpose?
40499	But what occasion is there for adopting such a resolution?
40499	But what was the case?
40499	But what would become of the acts of Congress?
40499	But what, in this state of things, would restrain their piratical cruisers in the West Indies?
40499	But where is the necessity of raising the impost to this degree?
40499	But where was the government that had funded its debts under the circumstances of the American debt?
40499	But who started this question?
40499	But why did the creditors part with their acknowledgment of the debt?
40499	But why do these men set themselves up in such a particular manner against slavery?
40499	But why is this degree of caution necessary?
40499	But why is this desirable?
40499	But why should we lose time to examine the theory when it is in our power to resort to experience?
40499	But why will gentlemen contend for incorporating amendments into the constitution?
40499	But why, Mr. Chairman, should we hasten on this business of funding?
40499	But would gentlemen infer from hence, that no alteration ought to take place if the manufactures were well established?
40499	But, asked he, are precedents in war to justify violations of private and State rights in a time of peace?
40499	But, if the sum voted was too small, what would be the consequence?
40499	But, in taking the principle of territory, are the House to calculate on the uninhabited wilderness?
40499	But, instead of this, what is proposed?
40499	But, let me ask, if the Treaty should not be carried into effect, will that relieve that deserving class of our citizens?
40499	But, said Mr. W., let us waive this subject, and inquire if negotiation had failed, whether war would not have been the consequence?
40499	But, say those who hide the absurdity under the cover of ambiguous phrases, have we no discretion?
40499	But, sir, is the whole morality of the United States confined to the Quakers?
40499	But, sir, what is the situation of the people who hold these bills?
40499	By applying proper rules of interpretation?
40499	By emissions of bills of credit?
40499	By loans at home?
40499	By taxes?
40499	By what magic can it be made to appear it will be more proper at the end of ten years?
40499	By what provision of the constitution is the Treaty- making power, agreeably to the construction of the gentlemen, limited?
40499	By whom, then, he would ask again, was the Government to be dissolved?
40499	Can a market be obtained without the merchant?
40499	Can any body of men to be raised in this country tread down the substantial yeomanry?
40499	Can any of the Secretary''s plans be called bills?
40499	Can any person, who has read our constitution, believe that it is in our power to pass a law without limitation?
40499	Can any reason be assigned for making this distinction?
40499	Can any solid argument against the resolution on the table arise from a conduct of this kind?
40499	Can any thing show more friendly to the Union than adopting the constitution, and sending us here to administer it?
40499	Can any thing tend more to make men think themselves mean, or degrade to a lower point their estimation of virtue and their standard of action?
40499	Can gentlemen state more serious apprehensions in the former than the latter case?
40499	Can it be supposed it would be necessary, said he, to give any member of this House double pay to accept of the office?
40499	Can it be supposed that a part will be more desirous of promoting the good of the whole than the whole will of the part?
40499	Can it be supposed that such a character as this is influenced by such a motive?
40499	Can it be supposed that the name of Senators will render those members superior to their fellow- citizens?
40499	Can not his friends introduce it as their own, by making and seconding a motion for that purpose?
40499	Can the House listen seriously to such a proposition?
40499	Can the advocates of the amendment even affect apprehensions that there is any intention to introduce a foreign nobility as a privileged order?
40499	Can the human mind retain, with any great degree of decision, objects so extensive and multifarious upon a mere oral communication?
40499	Can there be any foundation for alarm, when Congress expressly declare, that they have no power of interference prior to the year 1808?
40499	Can they expect the planters to come in a body, and take off their goods upon their arrival?
40499	Can things certain be balanced by things uncertain?
40499	Can this Government, said he, protect its officers from the resentment of any one State in the Union?
40499	Can this be the inference of common sense?
40499	Can this possibly be a true construction of the Treaty- making power?
40499	Can this, then, he would ask, be a bill proper to perpetuate, or fit for the restoration of the credit of the United States?
40499	Can two parties exist in a well organized Government to dispute about property, and have no judge?
40499	Can we desire any thing more ardently than a termination of the Indian war?
40499	Can we find that she ever imposed a duty of six cents per gallon on molasses?
40499	Can we retribute the sufferings which have been caused by the depreciation of our currency?
40499	Can you then recover the money back again?
40499	Certainly gentlemen would not pretend to bestow a privilege upon a man which he is incapable of using?
40499	Congress having no money to give them, offered something; what?
40499	Constituents made no scruple to tell Representatives of their faults, and he saw no reason why Representatives might not tell constituents of theirs?
40499	Could any man tell?
40499	Could any possible wrong be done to those who hold the domestic debt, by estimating it at its current value?
40499	Could he look with affection and veneration to such a country as his parent?
40499	Could it be pretended there was a shadow of authority given to the House of Representatives?
40499	Could the House, in this case, exercise its discretion, whether or no a Convention should be called?
40499	Could this be the fair construction of our so much boasted constitution?
40499	Could we say, in such a case, that the tax had been uniform?
40499	Did France before this war give us free trade to her colonies?
40499	Did Holland, before the present war, open to us all her rich possessions in the East Indies?
40499	Did any gentleman think there was sufficient evil in the late Treaty with Great Britain to authorize them in refusing to carry it into effect?
40499	Did any member wish at this period to attempt this inquiry?
40499	Did gentlemen wish to re- establish a temporary Territorial Government there?
40499	Did he imagine that, as it is, they are not kept in a perpetual state of alarm, of exertion, and of danger?
40499	Did it authorize a perpetual tax, irrepealable by the whole Legislature, without a breach of faith, according to received doctrine?
40499	Did it authorize a plan for supplying former deficiencies, which it is admitted do not exist?
40499	Did it authorize an entire provision for the public debt, past, present, and to come?
40499	Did it bear a proportion to his services, or was it in proportion to what the members of the Senate and this House were to be allowed?
40499	Did it condemn the doctrine of the majority?
40499	Did it encourage the hopes of those who wished the establishment of Government upon the principle of equal rights?
40499	Did it lead to a discovery of truth?
40499	Did it not rivet the chains upon the people of England?
40499	Did it render the people of Ireland more respectable in the eyes of the people of the United States?
40499	Did not New York dispose of lands within her chartered limits, and from the sales become wealthy, as she has large sums in the funds?
40499	Did not duty require a provision for the defence and safety of the United States by_ internal_ resources?
40499	Did not this mean something more than the bare discharge of their expenses?
40499	Did the General enter into these engagements out of personal regard to individuals, without a view to the public interest?
40499	Did the House imagine that their censure, like the wand of a magician, would lay a spell on these people?
40499	Did the Secretary apply the money borrowed in Europe agreeably to the legal appropriations and the instructions of the PRESIDENT?
40499	Did the Secretary of the Treasury apply the money to other uses than the law directed?
40499	Did the soldier accept of this offer?
40499	Did these acts originate with the Executive?
40499	Did they consider this House as the only branch from which any danger was to be apprehended?
40499	Did they contribute to strengthen the country against invasion by staying at home and joining the invader as soon as he was successful?
40499	Did they mean to rob the Almighty of what they call his prerogative?
40499	Did they mean, that the first event which would put an end to their own authority should be the last act of Government?
40499	Did they not refuse to correspond with any society that aided, or in any manner abetted, the insurrection?
40499	Did they not, in the most pointed manner, discountenance any such proceeding?
40499	Did they suspect the Legislature of doing wrong?
40499	Did they turn themselves to industry and useful pursuits?
40499	Did they, by their arms or contributions, establish our independence?
40499	Did this act of submission render them more respectable in the eyes of the people of England?
40499	Did this passage show that the PRESIDENT wanted them to intermeddle?
40499	Did we go to the Emperor of Morocco, or to the Dey of Algiers, and challenge a passage for our ships up the Mediterranean?
40499	Did we intend to rival the military establishments in Europe?
40499	Did we judiciously examine whether the spirit of the law accords with the habits and manners of the people?
40499	Do gentlemen conceive that on any occasion instructions would be so general as to proceed from all our constituents?
40499	Do gentlemen contemplate to what issue these principles would lead?
40499	Do gentlemen foresee the extent of these words?
40499	Do gentlemen imagine that State will join the Union?
40499	Do gentlemen mean that he shall give it piecemeal, by way of question and answer?
40499	Do gentlemen suppose our laws, like those of the Medes and Persians, unchangeable?
40499	Do gentlemen, said he, consider the importance of the power they give the officer by the clause?
40499	Do the United States avenge these murders?
40499	Do these gentlemen require any thing more respecting the powers of Congress, than a description of the ends of government?
40499	Do these men expect a general emancipation of slaves by law?
40499	Do they believe the capitals of those banks adequate to the exigencies of the nation?
40499	Do they demand back the property carried off?
40499	Do they leave their State and relinquish their occupations?
40499	Do they mean to purchase their freedom?
40499	Do they not admit that He is the source of all good, and can they refuse to acknowledge it?
40499	Do they not observe that the fate of the Government is deeply involved in the decision?
40499	Do they understand the rights of mankind, and the disposition of Providence, better than others?
40499	Do we charge bribery or corruption?
40499	Do we ever originate any money bill?
40499	Do we impeach the Executive?
40499	Do you know one Robert Randall?
40499	Do you mean to pay the principal and interest now due?
40499	Do you think we should pay the tax?
40499	Does Portugal open the Brazils?
40499	Does Spain open her rich islands in the East and West Indies, and her immense possessions in South America?
40499	Does any gentleman expect, while we have a public debt, to prevent speculation in our funds?
40499	Does any gentleman imagine that an officer is entitled to his office as to an estate?
40499	Does experience sanction such an opinion?
40499	Does he infer that the people can, in detached bodies, contravene an act established by the whole people?
40499	Does he mean that it shall lie dormant and never be exercised?
40499	Does it consist in the exaltation of one man, and the humiliation of the rest?
40499	Does it contain any thing which is not true?
40499	Does not that new order prohibit, as much as ever, American vessels from carrying provisions to the West India Islands?
40499	Does not the British Government wish to deprive us of this branch also?
40499	Does she not receive every thing which she could have demanded in relation to that Treaty?
40499	Does she, in the Treaty lately made, open even Florida, as Great Britain has Canada?
40499	Does the House believe this?
40499	Does the dignity of a nation consist in the distance between the first magistrate and his citizens?
40499	Does the gentleman conceive that such only are delegated as are expressed?
40499	Does the lawyer neglect his client?
40499	Does the merchant forego his commerce, or the farmer his agriculture?
40499	Does this look like a democracy, when one of the first acts of the two branches of the Legislature is to confer titles?
40499	Does this mean a part of the people in a township or district, or does it mean the representatives in the State Legislatures?
40499	First, what article shall be the subject of a particular tax, and what shall remain in the common mass liable to an impost_ ad valorem_?
40499	For what is the tendency of this counterfeit alarm?
40499	For what purpose, then, shall it be committed?
40499	For what reason have we made a difference between the President and Vice President?
40499	For what rights of a citizen will be deemed inviolable when a State renounces the principles that constitute their security?
40499	From whence, he asked, do we acquire the authority to exercise this power?
40499	Gentlemen had said, Shall this House not have as much power respecting Treaties as the House of Commons in Great Britain?
40499	Gentlemen on the other side had spoken of their feelings; did they suppose, he asked, that those who were in the majority had not feelings?
40499	Gentlemen say it will work injustice; but are we not as much bound to repair the injustice done by the United States?
40499	Gentlemen say the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for the information he gives the House-- in what manner does this responsibility act?
40499	Gentlemen say-- why provide the money if it be not wanted?
40499	Gentlemen talked about impeachment?
40499	Government, in the most solemn manner, pledged itself to make compensation to the soldiers, have they done it?
40499	Grant it; but can they say that we shall never have a war with any European power?
40499	Great Britain obtained no soldiers from her East and West India settlements, were they therefore useless?
40499	Had experience proved that the negroes would not make good soldiers?
40499	Had it a concurrent right with the States?
40499	Had not our neutrality been the occasion of our wealth and prosperity?
40499	Had not the managers of our Government kept a watchful eye on our affairs?
40499	Had she a claim under the Treaty of 1783, which is forgotten?
40499	Had the Executive avowed the plan of the Secretary of War, or his reasoning?
40499	Had the public mind been less disturbed on the late Treaty than in 1793?
40499	Had they a right to assist in the formation of Treaties in such a manner as that a Treaty would be incomplete without their sanction officially given?
40499	Had they done so?
40499	Had they not a claim on the House to adopt such means as would enable the citizens in every State to judge of the propriety of public measures?
40499	Had this done any good to the cause?
40499	Has not the Legislature done so before?
40499	Has that been altered since by the incorporation of amendments?
40499	Has the constitution made this House a diplomatic body, invested with the powers of negotiation?
40499	Have any nations in the present European war, premised their operations by a declaration?
40499	Have not express charges, as well as vague rumors, been brought against him at the bar of the public?
40499	Have not the public a right to know the sentiments of the House on every question?
40499	Have the newspapers reprobated it?
40499	Have the principles on which you ground the reproach upon Cabinets and Kings no practical influence-- no binding force?
40499	Have there not bills originated in this House which have caused the expenditure of much money to very little purpose?
40499	Have these people here( the Democratic societies) any such opportunity?
40499	Have they any right to interfere with our internal policy?
40499	Have they not pushed conquests into the Indian country north- west of the Ohio?
40499	Have they precedent for this assertion?
40499	Have we heard any complaints against it?
40499	Have we not laid extra duties on various articles, expressly for the purpose of encouraging various branches of our own manufactures?
40499	Have we not, said he, been one of the happiest nations upon earth?
40499	Have we received a power to exercise in wantonly oppressing those who gave it?
40499	Have we, in truth, originated this money bill?
40499	Have you any proof to cite that you are not guilty?
40499	Have you got any new associates in this city?
40499	Having stated these preliminaries, Mr. B. proceeded to inquire what were the powers attempted to be exercised by this bill?
40499	Having this advantage, can it be doubted that we have not industry and enterprise to improve it?
40499	He adverted to the idea of direct taxation, and inquired, on what principle will gentlemen consent to this mode of raising the necessary supplies?
40499	He appealed to the feelings of every honorable man in the committee, whether demands for justice and reparation for injuries were enforced by threats?
40499	He asked if any of the States had ever established various rates for their lands?
40499	He asked if the Creeks performed a single tittle of the treaty of New York, about which there had been so much parade?
40499	He asked if, before the purchase, the certificates were debts due from the United States?
40499	He asked if, in the present situation of the country, all dependence was to be placed on commerce?
40499	He asked what better time there was than the present for settling the amount of these claims?
40499	He asked what would this countervail be?
40499	He asked whether this Government was intended for a temporary or a lasting one?
40499	He asked whether words could be devised that would place the new Government more precisely in the same relation to the real creditors with the old?
40499	He asked, if, in such a case, it was competent to the House rightfully to withhold the means necessary for the performance of the public engagement?
40499	He asked, upon parallel principles, what might Congress not do?
40499	He asked, what was the authority of the United States?
40499	He asked, who would lend us money, if there was such a difficulty in establishing funds to pay the interest of it?
40499	He had asked, why, since the PRESIDENT had proclaimed a Treaty as the law of the land, which was not the law of the land, why he was not impeached?
40499	He had said, how could they determine whether the Treaty was constitutional or not, or whether an impeachment was necessary, without information?
40499	He inquired how the gentleman proposed to get information?
40499	He inquired of him whether the House itself went into an investigation of facts in the first instance?
40499	He inquired whether the House were to sanction and authorize the reports of the proposed stenographer?
40499	He noticed the objection from banks banishing the specie; he said the surplus only would be sent out of the country; but is it given away?
40499	He only wanted to ask whether the call for yeas and nays was withdrawn or not?
40499	He proceeded to inquire whether this clause gives them the right to make Treaties the supreme law of the land?
40499	He said, gentlemen asked who would be offended or hurt by this plan?
40499	He then inquired what better time there could be for learning the number and extent of the losses than the present?
40499	He then inquired whether, under the existing state of things, the Treaty ought to be rejected?
40499	He then inquired, of what right does this incorporation deprive a single citizen?
40499	He thought it advisable to guard against abuses; but has this abuse not already taken place?
40499	He was next interrogated by the SPEAKER, as follows: Are you guilty, or not guilty?
40499	He was then asked, whether the call of yesterday was valid to- day, or if it was necessary for the members to rise over again?
40499	He would inquire how they became so?
40499	He would inquire what Treaties could be entered into by the PRESIDENT and Senate, without infringing upon the powers placed in Congress?
40499	His first inquiry, he said, should be, whether negroes were to be considered as property?
40499	How are the judges to determine in the case; are they to be guided in their decisions by the rules of expediency?
40499	How are those sentiments reconcilable to the oath we have taken?
40499	How are we to form one?
40499	How can gentlemen answer for this, who call themselves representatives, on the broad basis of national interest?
40499	How can it be such an_ ex post facto_ law as is prescribed by the constitution, when that expression is conjunctive with a bill of attainder?
40499	How can the business originate in this House, if we have it reported to us by the Minister of Finance?
40499	How can they reconcile their conduct?
40499	How can we help it?
40499	How could certain members reconcile this proceeding with their former votes and language?
40499	How could it then bear a comparison with that House, who were chosen by the whole people every two years?
40499	How could they annul a State law, when the State would be able to plead a precedent on the part of Congress?
40499	How could they be called freemen, if they were, against their consent, to be expelled from the country?
40499	How could they delegate a power to others which they did not possess themselves?
40499	How did that appear?
40499	How is this to be done?
40499	How long could an enlightened people remain in such a state of insensibility and torpor?
40499	How many of them are springing up in the Northern States?
40499	How many ways of proceeding lie open before us?
40499	How retaliate?
40499	How then can gentlemen assert that the powers of appointment and removal are incident to the Executive Department of Government?
40499	How then do you propose to restrain the Secretary of the Treasury?
40499	How then was he to find evidence of his behavior during such a length of time?
40499	How was that money applied, and what will now be necessary?
40499	How was this done?
40499	How was this to settle the principle of excise?
40499	How were they to regulate commerce?
40499	How were we to act?
40499	How will he please both?
40499	How will they know the laws, if we do not understand the constitution after it has been in operation for nearly eight years?
40499	How will this doctrine operate upon the power of appropriation?
40499	How would he embarrass his family and property in such engagements?
40499	How, then, can gentlemen from those States contend that the proposed duty is so much too high as to occasion the fatal consequences they foretell?
40499	How, then, can gentlemen reconcile their conduct of this day to the liberality they have hitherto shown?
40499	How, then, can gentlemen suppose the revenue ought to be perpetual, in order to be commensurate with the object?
40499	How, then, is it possible they can continue their trade, when you lop off another part of their capital?
40499	I am sensible this Treaty presents itself with an unfavorable aspect, and what is the reason?
40499	I ask again, Mr. Chairman, if the people of this country possess less power than the people of that despotic Government?
40499	I ask gentlemen, can there be a greater evil than this in any Government?
40499	I ask, further, when such attempts have been made, have they not failed of success?
40499	I asked those, as I might ask my colleague now, who of our constituents could calculate what he would save by any proposed reduction of our pay?
40499	I asked, is not the assignment of certificates confirmed by the motion?
40499	I asked, of what is the assignee deprived but of his late sanguine expectations?
40499	I asked, where is the injustice of the State''s complying with its engagements made to the first holders of certificates as far as the case admits?
40499	I asked, whether the proposition before us does not rather establish confidence in Government than the contrary?
40499	I can not, for my part, conceive how any person can be said to acquire a property in another; is it by virtue of conquest?
40499	I fear war as much as any man, when a pretext is given; but can it be seriously said a rejection of this Treaty is a cause of war?
40499	I resort especially to the convictions of the Western gentlemen, whether, supposing no posts and no Treaty, the settlers will remain in security?
40499	I say, would not such reflections, with ruin before our eyes, produce a degree of irritation in the most calm amongst us?
40499	I trust it is neither too presumptuous, nor too late to ask, can you put the dearest interest of society at risk without guilt, and without remorse?
40499	I will ask the gentleman by what precise authority he borrowed the money in Amsterdam and Antwerp, and paid it in Paris?
40499	I will ask, are they more?
40499	I will ask, though, is this country ever to be in a settled and quiet state?
40499	I will ask, was it ever known in a Treaty, that a stipulation was made to give up property plundered after the peace?
40499	I wish, therefore, to be ascertained of one fact, do the army wish a measure of this kind to take place?
40499	I wonder where they are going so cheerfully?"
40499	I would ask what state we were in then?
40499	I would ask, if the other members of the Union are not also to be consulted?
40499	I would beg to ask those, then, who are desirous of freeing the negroes, if they have funds sufficient to pay for them?
40499	If I receive a favor, what but the sentiment of gratitude ought to direct me in my acknowledgments?
40499	If a cargo of nails were to be sent to Carolina, I would be glad to know how we are to purchase it?
40499	If a law is the expression of the will, must not an appropriation law be equally so?
40499	If a permanent seat is established, why not go to it immediately?
40499	If a war should suddenly break out, how is Congress to provide for it?
40499	If a wish of Congress can bring them into the Union, why should we decline to express such a wish?
40499	If any article is warranted on this account, how much more are we authorized to proceed on this occasion?
40499	If authority beyond this is assumed, however trifling the encroachment at first, where will it stop?
40499	If by the ill- timed promulgation of this report, we have laid the foundation for the calamity, ought we not to counteract it?
40499	If every member is to be bound by instructions how to vote, what are gentlemen from the extremities of the continent to do?
40499	If future difficulties should involve that nation still further, what must be the consequence?
40499	If he can not be removed, I should suppose he can not be suspended; and what security have the people against the machinations of a bad man in office?
40499	If his father had lived a few years longer, would there have arisen any question on this subject?
40499	If it be true, then, can the PRESIDENT repeal, as he has by the Treaty, the laws of Congress, although by the constitution he can not negative them?
40499	If it is inquired where we are to draw the line of a liberal construction, I will also inquire where the line of restriction is to be drawn?
40499	If it is, is the conclusion not obvious, that Congress have power to pass laws for carrying these powers into effect?
40499	If merchants can not get insurance, will they send their vessels out?
40499	If not, then, 2dly, Whether both, or either, and which of them, ought to be ratified?
40499	If our Senate should take any unwarrantable stride towards aristocracy, have we not the power to check them?
40499	If sequestration is hostility, as he had heard it called, what, he asked, is condemnation?
40499	If so, to what an extent must they go?
40499	If so, what was that expense, or what will be the probable increase?
40499	If so, will there be any economy in this mode of procedure?
40499	If suspicion had so long existed against the integrity of the Secretary, why was not information called for at the beginning of the session?
40499	If that was done, the Government would be removed to the Potomac; if not, we should stop short of it; and what would be the consequence?
40499	If the House undertake to censure particular classes of men, who can tell where they will stop?
40499	If the Indians are to be kept in peace by bribes, why not, in this, as in other similar cases, by presents and pecuniary rewards?
40499	If the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate have a right to make a law, do Congress make all laws?
40499	If the Potomac is struck out, are you sure of getting Baltimore?
40499	If the Secretary has paid what was due, what then is the complaint?
40499	If the Treaty had been the most complete and satisfactory, would it not be necessary to leave something to enforce its execution?
40499	If the controlling influence of this House was added, would the power be less?
40499	If the country had been plunged into a war, would it be as flourishing as it is?
40499	If the member from Virginia( Mr. GILES) had been opposed to the Treaty going into operation, why did he not take the proper mode to prevent it?
40499	If the next Legislature were disposed to violate the public honor, would the law now under consideration stand in their way?
40499	If the officer misbehaves, he can be removed by impeachment; but in this case is impeachment the only mode of removal?
40499	If the power flows from the nature and necessity of the case, it may be demanded, is the renot equal authority for the Bank?
40499	If the thing is in itself right, why refuse to vote directly for it?
40499	If then the fishermen ask you to restore only their own money, will you deny them?
40499	If these facts are established by the committee, would it give equal satisfaction as if they were established by the House?
40499	If these were really their sentiments, why did they not abide by them?
40499	If they are, will they take them by force?
40499	If they come here with badges at their button- holes, can you forbid them?
40499	If they do, what is the injury arising from the adoption of the resolution intended to be submitted to the committee?
40499	If they had such an abhorrence for slavery, why, said Mr. S., did they not cast us off and reject our alliance?
40499	If they intermeddle in the business of sailors, why not in that of manufacturers and farmers?
40499	If they will not be content with that, shall it be committed to investigate facts?
40499	If this argument was founded in fact, it would put an end to all debates on all the new taxes; but what was this notable discovery?
40499	If this doctrine prevails, to what a situation would the Representatives of a free people be reduced?
40499	If this is the case, does it not imply a censure by the House on certain characters?
40499	If this is the case, is there any person of humanity that would not wish to prevent them?
40499	If this is the case, will a revenue law for one or two years bring that relief which is expected?
40499	If this is to be adduced as a proof of the popularity of a measure, what are we to say with respect to a tax on tea?
40499	If this right was denied them, where would the principle stop?
40499	If this system should prevail, were we to receive British productions through other countries?
40499	If to continue in session be an evil, why are we here?
40499	If we are parties, what would be the decision before a court of justice?
40499	If we do not mean to deceive, why not make the provision commensurate to the occasion?
40499	If we pay this attention to them, in one instance, what good reason is there for contemning them in another?
40499	If we refuse to say that the act itself is a crime, how can we condemn Randall as criminal?
40499	If we relinquish this branch of the cod fishery, what is left us?
40499	If we should go as far South as Baltimore, why not an equal distance south- west to the Potomac?
40499	If what he said was not sufficient to disprove it, he asked where is the evidence to support it?
40499	If you do not mean to indemnify, why inquire at all?
40499	If, then, they chose to yield one species of property, might they not another?
40499	If, therefore, some interpretation of the constitution must be indulged, by what rules is it to be governed?
40499	If, therefore, we are forewarned, ought we not to be forearmed?
40499	In addition to the loss of this Government, would not every member of the Legislature, he asked, lose his character, credit, and reputation?
40499	In case of an army establishment, for example, suppose the PRESIDENT or Senate were to refuse their assent to the repeal of a law establishing it?
40499	In cases of a more serious kind, is not sentiment the only prompt and enlightened guide of our conduct?
40499	In discussing the question, he inquired, What has Congress already done?
40499	In favor of the militia, it may be asked, who fought the battle of Bunker''s Hill?
40499	In many cases the Executives are not in particular vested with the power of appointment; and do they exercise that power by virtue of their office?
40499	In short, was not this a kind of argument infinitely more tending to the production of prejudice than to the discovery of truth?
40499	In spite of this mock solemnity, I demand, if the House will not concur in the measure to execute the Treaty, what other course shall we take?
40499	In such case, may not titles do an injury to the Union?
40499	In this case a question arises: What is, upon the whole, most just and expedient?
40499	In what does the case differ between the depreciated paper and the certificates?
40499	In what manner had this trust been carried into execution?
40499	In what mode are the memorialists to be informed of our humane dispositions?
40499	Instead of Baltimore, is it not probable we may have Susquehanna inserted, perhaps the Delaware?
40499	Is Congress vested with power to grant privileges contained in the bill?
40499	Is he absolutely bound to perform what he is instructed to do?
40499	Is his maxim supported by precedent drawn from the practice of the individual States?
40499	Is it a narrow affection for the spot where a man was born?
40499	Is it among the archives?
40499	Is it because the feelings of the Friends will be hurt to have their affair conducted in the usual course of business?
40499	Is it contended to be out of order?
40499	Is it expected that a Senator shall eat more, or drink more costly liquors, than a member of the House of Representatives?
40499	Is it expected, said Mr. N., that I am to abandon my independence for the sake of the PRESIDENT?
40499	Is it for the_ undaunted_ and_ energetic_ countenance of the cause of France, in her struggle for freeing herself from despotic shackles?
40499	Is it from such a nation( he asked) that we are to hope for justice?
40499	Is it limited by any law past?
40499	Is it limited by the provisions with respect to appropriations?
40499	Is it necessary to add, that a powerful body of seamen, at some future day, may save us from the vast expense and danger of a standing army?
40499	Is it necessary, or was it ever thought so, to make it a stipulation by Treaty?
40499	Is it not an established principle amongst all civilized nations, that plundered property shall be given up?
40499	Is it not because we have entertained too exalted ideas of our own national importance?
40499	Is it not implied by all of them, that certain oaths, residence, and property, make the requisites to form citizenship?
40499	Is it not on account of his superior station and his dignity?
40499	Is it not our business to inquire into the cause of this strange conduct?
40499	Is it not part of our legislative authority?
40499	Is it not sufficient that their time and talents are given to the public?
40499	Is it not the duty of the House to check this spirit of devastation?
40499	Is it our present President?
40499	Is it polite, is it generous, to force him to renounce it?
40499	Is it politic and wise, then, Mr. Chairman, to exert the power contended for, even if it be authorized by the constitution?
40499	Is it possible that any man can be hardy enough to avow them, and their ridiculous consequences?
40499	Is it possible that these societies can exist, for any length of time, when they are of no real use to the country?
40499	Is it possible to transport the revenue from one end of the continent to the other?
40499	Is it pretended that the services and supplies were an inadequate compensation?
40499	Is it reasonable to expect that men should sacrifice domestic ease and the interests of their families to serve their country?
40499	Is it supposed that all this matter can go off without any noise or combustion?
40499	Is it the_ manly_ demand of restitution made of Great Britain for her accumulated injuries that called forth the praise?
40499	Is it to rouse again the sleeping apparitions which have disturbed the back country?
40499	Is it to show that the mock dangers which they have pretended to dread are real?
40499	Is it to them we owe our present happiness?
40499	Is it true, that an unwillingness to pay debts hath been the principal cause of opposition to this Treaty?
40499	Is it within the powers of this Congress to grant bounties?
40499	Is it worthy the attention of Government that the cod fishery should be preserved?
40499	Is it written?
40499	Is not our public credit totally gone?
40499	Is not the assignment of the certificates confirmed by the nation?
40499	Is not the present a most favorable opportunity for holding up these people to popular resentment?
40499	Is not this House excluded?
40499	Is not this, as a principle, as novel, as improper, as that which alarms our opponents?
40499	Is not, therefore, eight cents disproportioned to the rates fixed, or intended to be imposed on other articles?
40499	Is that nation more debased than others?
40499	Is the House to be told that, for the sake of harmony, they must give up their own powers and opinions?
40499	Is the House to consider the present, or the expected population?
40499	Is the Treaty- making power not a power vested by the constitution in the Government of the United States, or in a department or officer thereof?
40499	Is the confidence of the people in the services, and patriotism, and wisdom of the Chief Magistrate diminished?
40499	Is the power of establishing an incorporated bank among the powers vested by the constitution in the Legislature of the United States?
40499	Is the zeal of gentlemen, who oppose this design, influenced by their despair of removing the seat of Government afterwards?
40499	Is the_ habeas corpus_ act, or the statute_ De Tallagio non concedendo_ incorporated in_ magna charta_?
40499	Is there a common centre?
40499	Is there a man who does not believe that, had the treaty not been ratified, we should have had war?
40499	Is there a reciprocal stipulation by Great Britain with respect to the articles unexecuted by her?
40499	Is there another point of law and justice for the Government?
40499	Is there any difference in effect between lodging general powers in a government, and permitting the exercise of them by subtle constructions?
40499	Is there any fair construction by which the bill can be deemed an exercise of the power to borrow money?
40499	Is there any impropriety in desiring them to consider a question which they have not yet decided?
40499	Is there any impropriety in paying this mark of respect to a man to whom all America owes such indelible obligations?
40499	Is there any other head proposed to be on the coin but the President''s?
40499	Is there any thing improper or unwise in this determination?
40499	Is there any thing wrong in this?
40499	Is there any time when the civil list will cease its demand?
40499	Is there not more responsibility in one man than in large bodies?
40499	Is this House to negotiate the Treaty over again?
40499	Is this bill to borrow money?
40499	Is this exciting mobs?
40499	Is this fair?
40499	Is this gratitude or insult?
40499	Is this language to be used within the United States?
40499	Is this pursuing a liberal system of politics?
40499	Is this right, is this just, that all our rights should be thus bartered away under a Treaty- making power?
40499	Is this so?
40499	Is this the peace gentlemen undertake, with such fearless confidence, to maintain?
40499	Is this to be the style of an American Congress?
40499	Is this, he asked, consonant to the feelings of the House, and shall they not attempt to counteract its effects in the only constitutional manner?
40499	It does not call for any thing to be done, then why a reference?
40499	It had been asked if the PRESIDENT was responsible for the contents of this Report from the Secretary of War?
40499	It had been asked why the call for information had not been sooner made?
40499	It had been asked, what control the House were to have over this officer?
40499	It has been asked, Is not the Senate as worthy of the confidence of the citizens of the United States as this House?
40499	It has, indeed, been said, it will shorten our sessions; but would this be a benefit?
40499	It is more than probable she will, and if she should, what remedy have we?
40499	It is not for his gratification; for whose, then, are we to do this?
40499	It is only to be inquired, then, whether this was a proper subject of retaliation?
40499	It is said we have not done much, and what we have done is merely our duty, for which we receive wages?
40499	It is the commercial importance of the city of London which makes it the seat of Government; and what is the consequence?
40499	It is true, we may live for two dollars a day; but how?
40499	It may be a future question, also, whether he is to be dismissed when the galleries are cleared?
40499	It was a payment of our_ bona fide_ debts; what could we do?
40499	It was acknowledged by every gentleman that the Treaty of 1783 was broken by the United States; and, if so, what could their negotiator do?
40499	It was asked if the Treaty power could receive any check?
40499	It was asked, by what means is the Government to administer redress?
40499	It was asked, what would be the consequence of refusing to carry the Treaty into effect?
40499	It was enough to fix the general principles, viz: Whether there shall be a General Land Officer and two subordinates?
40499	It was nothing more or less than, would they or would they not now appropriate moneys to carry the British Treaty into effect?
40499	It was true, that a proposition for postponement was made, but what was the extent of that postponement?
40499	JACKSON.--Do not gentlemen think there is some danger on the other side?
40499	Lastly, did it authorize an extensive increase of the Sinking Fund, which we are informed is one of the principal objects?
40499	Let me ask gentlemen, if they, or any of their connections, would accept an appointment under this law, with such an exceptionable clause in it?
40499	Let me ask, why there is for ever so much complaint against Great Britain because she does not open all her colonies freely to us?
40499	Let us pause for a moment, and ask, Was this possible?
40499	Let us, then, inquire, is the constituting a public bank necessary to these important and essential ends of Government?
40499	Lewis.--Then it was, he said, that if it was not convenient for Mr. MURRAY to be concerned in a share in land, he might have it in money?
40499	Little or nothing: how then could he ascertain who was a proper person to legislate or judge of the laws?
40499	Look at the constitution of Great Britain; is that all contained in one instrument?
40499	MADISON?)
40499	Major Torrey died in September, 1783; shall this body decide against the settled rule of all the law courts?
40499	Many exertions had he to make to feed the hungry and cover the naked; were not these for the public good, and shall his private property suffer?
40499	May no other place be proposed?
40499	May not Congress with equal propriety, undertake to regulate the tobacco, the rice, and indigo trade, as well as that of the fisheries?
40499	May we promise ourselves more success in negotiation by laying down our arms, or by retaining them?
40499	Might they not say that they were betwixt nations what bargains were betwixt individuals?
40499	Mr. AMES then asked, whether it was not competent to put the previous question, viz: Shall this call be now taken?
40499	Mr. BALDWIN asked if the Government of the United States of America was four or five times worse to be administered than the Governments in Europe?
40499	Mr. BENSON wished the committee to consider what he judged to be a previous question, namely, how many departments there should be established?
40499	Mr. BOUDINOT asked what assurance we have that Britain will not play the same game over again that she has done already?
40499	Mr. CLARK would be very glad to hear the gentleman from Pennsylvania( Mr. FINDLAY) specify, upon what subject he was willing to pay a tax?
40499	Mr. DAYTON rose and asked,"Who shall decide, when doctors disagree?"
40499	Mr. DEXTER interrupted Mr. HARTLEY to inquire whether, by the laws of this State, the property of an insurgent is forfeited for his crime?
40499	Mr. GERRY observed, that some gentleman had said the Speaker is not an officer; but if he is not an officer, what is he?
40499	Mr. GILES said this subject had struck him in two points of view: whether Congress are not precluded from exercising any discretion on the subject?
40499	Mr. GOODHUE wished to ask Mr. CLAIBORNE one question,"Whether he found himself growing rich?"
40499	Mr. JACKSON said, in reply to the inquiry of Mr. SEDGWICK--"Why have we made a difference between the President and the Vice President?"
40499	Mr. LAWRENCE would inquire for what purpose the cession, mentioned in the constitution, was required?
40499	Mr. LIVINGSTON then proposed a question, Whether any of the shares had been left unappropriated by your associates and you?
40499	Mr. MADISON asked if the quantity of rum so exported was very considerable?
40499	Mr. NICHOLAS inquired if there was any law on this head?
40499	Mr. PARKER wanted to know what was the object of gentlemen in the appointment of a Committee of Conference?
40499	Mr. S. asked him, whether in the Senate?
40499	Mr. S. asked, what, then, were they?
40499	Mr. SMITH was asked whether the offer was that they were to be granted at an inferior rate?
40499	Mr. STONE asked the gentleman last up, how he meant to have the amendments incorporated?
40499	Mr. T. said, this is all the length which we mean to go, and can any body object to this?
40499	Mr. Tilghman asked what Mr. MURRAY expressed to Randall when it was proposed to him to engage in the land scheme?
40499	Mr. Tilghman asked, whether Mr. MURRAY did not, to get the man''s whole secret from him, go beyond his views to draw him on?
40499	Mr. Tilghman then, through the SPEAKER, asked Mr. MURRAY whether he understood he was to pay for his share of land as the other associates or not?
40499	Mr. W. SMITH then asked Randall, whether it was not true, that he spoke to Mr. SAMUEL SMITH before he spoke to himself?
40499	Mr. W. asked, was this not done?
40499	Mr. WHITNEY was next asked at what time he would be ready to proceed with his defence?
40499	Must every transaction that took place, during the course of the last war, be ripped up?
40499	Must they pay their expenses too?
40499	My colleague says that he is not a man of fortune; but, has he not a profession by which he can make more than by his attendance on this House?
40499	Need I say that we fly in the face of that resolution when we pretend that the acts of that power are not valid until we have concurred in them?
40499	Negroes, it was said, would not fight; but he would ask whether it was owing to their being black or to their being slaves?
40499	Ninety thousand dollars was all the money at stake; but what has since been seen?
40499	No, sir; and is it in the contemplation of gentlemen to lay duties so high as to produce this equality?
40499	No; but we solicited, and pay dear for that passage; or did we go to the King of Spain, and demand a free navigation of the Mississippi?
40499	Now he would be glad to know if the distilleries and fisheries would not be precisely in the same situation, let which would take place?
40499	Now will you urge in argument for taxing the poor, that they already practise that temperance which you desire to bring universally about?
40499	Now, I ask gentlemen, whether the professed design of those duties was to raise a revenue, or to prevent the importation of those articles?
40499	Now, he wished to know, what principle of justice authorized the committee to lay a duty of six cents on molasses?
40499	Now, he would ask, if gentlemen could expect that the northern people would incline to go so far south?
40499	Now, if these people were to petition Congress to pass a law prohibiting matrimony, would gentlemen agree to refer such a petition?
40499	Now, in this case, what would you do?
40499	Now, is it intended to determine a centre from these three centres?
40499	Now, said he, do we think of refusing this privilege to all heretics in respect to political doctrines?
40499	Now, what is meant by reporting plans?
40499	Now, what more than this is required by the clause?
40499	Now, will any Government take such measures in gathering in its harvest, as to ruin the soil?
40499	Of individuals?
40499	Of the Treasury Department, too, which is considered in other countries as possessing and exercising the means of corruption?
40499	Of what use, then, was it to establish principles which could not govern the conduct of the House?
40499	Of what?
40499	On a division, shall the committee now rise?
40499	On motion for the previous question, to wit: Shall the question be now put on the following preliminary resolutions?
40499	On the first of June, the British were to give up the Western posts; if money was not appropriated, would they not be deceived?
40499	On the other hand, were not a Greene and a Mifflin furnished from the Society of the Quakers?
40499	On the other hand, whether it was not the most effectual mean of preserving his popularity, and of keeping him in office?
40499	On their Representatives?
40499	On what ground could this assumption have been made?
40499	On what principle can this distinction then be contended for?
40499	On what principle did he accept it?
40499	On what then do the people depend for checking encroachments, or preventing abuses?
40499	Once, however, he did see him; the first question of Mr. SEDGWICK was, from what State did he come?
40499	Or does it speak the same language now, as it did at the time it was obtained?
40499	Or does the Legislature establish them for the convenience of an individual?
40499	Or how can they say it is more expensive to establish it in this way than in another?
40499	Or is it wise to stand by and depend upon such a resource?
40499	Or is the Speaker to write them a letter, or the Sergeant- at- Arms with the mace to wait on them?
40499	Or rather, as my colleague has proposed, if they are incapable to pay both, will they not prefer a composition?
40499	Or shall we send across the sea for loans?
40499	Or shall we, by a candid and liberal construction of the powers expressed in the constitution, promote the great and important objects thereof?
40499	Or should we drive all printers from us who take notes, for the inaccuracies of some?
40499	Or the ruin of thousands and thousands by our delays of payment, and the consequent depreciation of our securities?
40499	Or was it true, that this power was competent to treat with every government on earth but that of Great Britain?
40499	Or was there any use for it but that the sentiments of every member might be known?
40499	Or where is the justice of doing more for the assignee than he, or his assignor, expected could or would be done?
40499	Or whether it restrained the States from exercising that power?
40499	Or whether there was any authority given to the Union, with which the exercise of this right by any State would be inconsistent?
40499	Or, if his life should not be invaded, what would its enjoyments be in a country odious to the eyes of strangers and dishonored in his own?
40499	Or, will the Government of the United States support the claim of the injured against her own Executive?
40499	Or, will you say that Congress might issue paper money?
40499	Ought they, from their remoteness, to be kept in the dark, or to be furnished with such light as would only mislead?
40499	Ought we to have at once acceded to hers?
40499	Our understandings have been addressed, it is true, and with ability and effect; but, I demand, has any corner of the heart been left unexplored?
40499	Perhaps I may be asked, Did not the States depend chiefly upon their own exertion for the defence of the frontiers under the old Congress?
40499	Pray, let me ask, if Great Britain have not equally tied their hands?
40499	Pray, would it not be a proper bar to the recovery of damages in a court of law to say Government has paid you?
40499	Provisions had been made by this House to carry Indian Treaties into effect; but why?
40499	SCOTT.--Has not this Government a right to restrain every wild- goose excursion into the woods?
40499	SEDGWICK.--Has it not been said that there was a party in the United States, not only for aristocracy, but even for monarchy?
40499	SWIFT) that, by paying these claims in the first instance, you are cutting the sinews of civil process?
40499	Shall a Treaty repeal a law or a law a Treaty?
40499	Shall his family be reduced to beggary, be stripped of their all, to discharge what the United States are in honor and in justice bound to pay?
40499	Shall it be said, that the House have a discretion as to appropriations, and yet they must make them as directed by a Treaty?
40499	Shall the House take no further measures on the subject, and receive the answer of the PRESIDENT as obligatory with regard to the question?
40499	Shall the Senate, because they may think it in one case trifling, or conceive the power ought to be placed in them, assume it?
40499	Shall the United States stipulate solemnly to guarantee the new boundary which may be arranged?
40499	Shall they not declare their own and their constituents''confidence undiminished in that officer of the Government?
40499	Shall they take the Lake of the Woods on one side, and the Missouri on the other, and find a geographical centre?
40499	Shall we hazard an entire loss of this revenue?
40499	Shall we intrust the conduct of that matter to the very persons who it has been alleged are often the aggressors?
40499	Shall we leave it to the fisherman, to be determined by his oath?
40499	Shall we make it an excuse for refusing to pass this vote, that we establish the principle of thanking nobody?
40499	Shall we never have done with the settlement and liquidation of our accounts?
40499	Shall we not let them see the end of their burthen in the law itself?
40499	Shall we put our hands into the pockets of our constituents, and appropriate moneys for uses we are undetermined of?
40499	Shall we say that man ought to have been made otherwise?
40499	Shall we say that the evidence carries on its face fraud and deception?
40499	Shall we sit still and bear it?
40499	Shall we then give up to a body, who has already a superiority over us, those superior powers which we possess relative to revenue?
40499	Shall we then proceed without them?
40499	Shall we then restrain a man from having an agency in the disposal of his own money?
40499	Shall we, dreading to become the blind instruments of power, yield ourselves the blinder dupes of mere sounds of imposture?
40499	Should Government, said Mr. V., come forward and show their imbecility by censuring what we can not punish?
40499	Should any thing be done at this time in the way of commercial regulations towards vindicating and advancing our national interests?
40499	Should that credit be destroyed( he asked) by destroying the confidence of foreigners in our faith?
40499	Should these fifty dollars fall to the Government, or to me?
40499	Should they then pass the law in such a manner as almost to warrant the people in resisting it?
40499	Should this bill pass, what can it be denominated but a delusion, a deception, sanctioned by Congress itself?
40499	Should those of our citizens who furnished the supplies, or loaned their money, be the only class who are injured?
40499	Since the bounty is to cease by this bill, what advantage in striking it out?
40499	Sir, did we fight for this?
40499	Suppose a person in office, not possessing the talents he was judged to have at the time of the appointment, is the error not to be corrected?
40499	Suppose he dislikes them, and will not have them, he is guilty of a breach of the law, is it intended by the House to impeach him for it?
40499	Suppose he refuses, will his vote be the less valid, or the community be disengaged from that obedience which is due to the laws of the Union?
40499	Suppose that all the Indians were driven over the Mississippi to- morrow, to whom would the lands which they now possess belong?
40499	Suppose that authority were in this way to grant millions upon millions, must the House, at all events, be compelled to provide for their payment?
40499	Suppose that, on the arrival of the definitive treaty, Congress had not agreed to the terms, would the war have then been considered as at an end?
40499	Suppose the revenue should fall short of his estimate, is he responsible for the balance?
40499	Suppose they instruct a representative, by his vote, to violate the constitution; is he at liberty to obey such instructions?
40499	Suppose, however, that it were omitted, and our country invaded, would a decision in Congress against raising armies be safer than the affirmative?
40499	Suppose, then, a vessel of thirty tons obtains, in a season, six hundred quintals of fish?
40499	Surely the substance ought not to pay at this rate-- then what good reason can be offered for the measure?
40499	Take all these together, is it not to be doubted that twelve hundred and fifty- six dollars will remain of the forty- four thousand in the Treasury?
40499	That gentleman wished to know to what point this information was to apply?
40499	That is not the question; but whether, organized as we are, under the constitution, we have a right to make such a grant?
40499	That it has been contrived with a view to lead them on by degrees to that kind of government which they have thrown off with abhorrence?
40499	The British Parliament has now no pay; but have they been as independent as their countrymen wished them under the British Government?
40499	The British had gone past them, and what was to hinder the Algerines, or such a man as Mr. Cooper, from getting past them?
40499	The French wished to be paid here, and it being no loss, but rather a profit, to comply with their wish, where was the harm in so doing?
40499	The House asked a question; the PRESIDENT answered in the negative-- for what purpose refer the answer?
40499	The House divided on the question,"Shall the delegate take an oath as a member?"
40499	The PRESIDENT asserts it; in the Address reported, the Senate assent; a motion is made to strike out; is it because the truth of it is doubted?
40499	The Romans and Greeks had slaves, and are not their glorious achievements held up as excitements to great and magnanimous actions?
40499	The SPEAKER asked what time he wanted?
40499	The SPEAKER then interrogated the prisoner, whether these charges were true or false?
40499	The SPEAKER then said, Is this the prisoner?
40499	The Treaty makes war indispensable, as the only redress of injuries, and how will war from the United States reach Great Britain?
40499	The United States owe the value they received, which they acknowledge, and which they have promised to pay: what is that value?
40499	The bill says it shall cease; and have gentlemen any objection to the bounty''s ceasing?
40499	The bill was then read the third time; and on the question, Shall the bill pass?
40499	The call for the question being now very general, it was put, shall the words"to be removable by the President,"be struck out?
40499	The debt is the price of our liberties, and can not be diminished a farthing, the gentleman from Virginia says; and why?
40499	The first of these was, whether the Algerines acted from their own impulse in this matter?
40499	The first question is, how much does Government receive by the duty on the salt used in curing the fish which is exported?
40499	The first question then was, is Congress vested with a power to grant the privileges contained in the bill?
40499	The first questions that offer themselves, are: Was the money in question appropriated to special and distinct purposes?
40499	The gentleman from Connecticut wished to know why he had brought this resolution before the House?
40499	The gentleman from New Hampshire asked, what do the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate operate upon?
40499	The gentleman says further, that the people have the right of instructing their representatives; if so, why not declare it?
40499	The government of that territory is a corporation; and who will deny that Congress may lawfully establish a bank beyond the Ohio?
40499	The grand question now is, did the State, by acceding to the confederation, give up her right of legislation?
40499	The law is to supply the necessary means of executing the principle laid down; for how can it be carried into effect in any other manner?
40499	The member asked, if the House were to close their understandings, and refuse all information from that quarter?
40499	The merit of the amendment depends on its adaptedness to the end proposed by the bill, and what is that?
40499	The next inquiry is, what rights will this company enjoy in this new character, that they do not enjoy independent of it?
40499	The next question is, to what amount the public are at present indebted?
40499	The only constant agents in political affairs are the passions of men-- shall we complain of our nature?
40499	The only question now is, whether this be a direct bounty, or simply a commutation of the allowance already granted by Congress?
40499	The only question, therefore, which appears to be before the committee is, whether we shall give this power to the President alone?
40499	The point to be settled is whether it shall be done by an oral communication, or transmitted in writing?
40499	The previous question being insisted upon, was put--"Shall the main question be now put?"
40499	The previous question thereon was called for by five members, to wit:"Shall the main question, to agree to the said resolution, be now put?"
40499	The previous question was called for by five members, to wit:"Shall the main question, to agree to the said resolution, be now put?"
40499	The previous question was now called for, by five members, viz:"Shall the main question to agree to the said resolution, be now put?"
40499	The previous question was then demanded by five members: Shall the main question be now put?
40499	The previous question,"Shall the main question now be put?"
40499	The principal inquiry is, will the institution facilitate the management of the finances?
40499	The question before the committee was, have the United States taken away any claim which the purchasers of these lands had?
40499	The question is, did he continue in service to the end of the war?
40499	The question is, what shall be the duty on any particular article?
40499	The question now to be determined, he conceived, was this-- is an addition to the present amount of the revenue necessary?
40499	The question then is, by whom?
40499	The question then is, whether the highest sum can be collected?
40499	The question then recurred, what Treaties were made under the authority of the United States?
40499	The question was called for, and put by the Chairman, Shall the committee now rise, and report progress?
40499	The question was taken,"Whether the President of the United States shall be addressed by the title of_ His Excellency_?"
40499	The question was then put by the SPEAKER, Shall the committee have leave to sit again?
40499	The question was then put, Shall the committee now rise and report progress?
40499	The question was then stated, to wit:"Shall the said bill be rejected?"
40499	The question was then taken, do the House agree to the amendment?
40499	The question was whether they were in a situation in which they could claim to be a State?
40499	The question was, had the Secretary violated a law?
40499	The question will only be, what powers has the constitution given, and to what departments have the same been distributed?
40499	The question, then, is reduced to its expediency, whether it is good policy to exercise the power or not?
40499	The remainder, viz:"If not, shall a temporary boundary be marked, making the Oconee the line, and the other parts of the treaty be concluded?"
40499	The right of Congress to regulate trade is adduced as an argument in favor of this of creating a corporation; but what has this bill to do with trade?
40499	The second, what the sum is that is proper for the article we select?
40499	Their present inexperience will soon be done away by a proper mode of discipline, and why may not these troops be soon instructed?
40499	Then they deemed war nearly inevitable, and would not this adjustment have been considered at that day as a happy escape from the calamity?
40499	Then was it proper, he asked, that the Executive should be requested to make a second answer, and nearly in the same words?
40499	Then why all this abuse of this particular sect, without discrimination?
40499	Then why disturb the tranquillity of the people?
40499	Then why not, for the sake of conciliation, grant it?
40499	Then why should the poor of Massachusetts be taxed for the beverage they use of spruce, molasses and water?
40499	Then you are bound, by this precedent, to indemnify him; and how can you distinguish what was the real motive to that outrage?
40499	There appeared to him only two things as necessary to be inquired into: First, Was the new Government Republican?
40499	There is a river, it is said, which runs two hundred miles into the country as far as the Allegany mountains; what advantage can this be to Congress?
40499	There is no doubt, sir, but it will; but does this tend to show that the constituent has no right to instruct?
40499	There is to be but one head; but does not our Government consist of three parts?
40499	Therefore, why involve in this indiscriminate censure men who have deserved so well of their country?
40499	These are the commercial acquisitions we have obtained by the Treaty; and let me ask, what have we given to Britain in return for them?
40499	They must come in ballast: and will the mere transportation of our crop be a sufficient inducement to engage them to come here?
40499	They, indeed, afford an exception to the cases above mentioned; but how far were they successful?
40499	This being the fact, he inquired, what could be done with the Southern produce, in case of the exclusion of foreign bottoms?
40499	This was a pleasing situation; but what was the situation of the British debtors?
40499	This was true, he believed; but how would it apply in the sense the gentleman wished?
40499	To others I will urge, can any circumstance mark upon a people more turpitude and debasement?
40499	To such a nation was it proper to trust a latitude of that extent?
40499	To the first of these I ask, against whom is the suit to commence?
40499	To what purpose then to sound the alarm, and to ring the tocsin from Georgia to New Hampshire?
40499	To what should they compare Treaties?
40499	To what, he asked, would a contrary doctrine lead?
40499	To what?
40499	To whom was the care of our prisoners in Philadelphia committed?
40499	True, it might be asked, why say negroes or other property?
40499	Under all circumstances, should not his estate be indemnified?
40499	Under it money may be borrowed, as well as commerce regulated; and why not money appropriated?
40499	Under these circumstances, do gentlemen contend that an indiscriminate conduct is due to Great Britain and to Holland?
40499	Under these circumstances, what was to be expected but complaints from the people, and a consequent repeal of the bill?
40499	Under those circumstances what could we have done?
40499	Upon what ground, then, do gentlemen stand?
40499	VINING.--Why do gentlemen say that such an office is unnecessary, when they are forced to admit that all the duties are essential?
40499	Was Government to be burdened with them, and derive no compensation?
40499	Was he the author of the Funding System?
40499	Was he the author of the plan for establishing the National Bank?
40499	Was he the author of the report on the fisheries?
40499	Was he to be both judge and executioner in his own case?
40499	Was he to manufacture it himself, or in what way could he better obtain it than from the Heads of the Departments?
40499	Was it a sufficient reason for exempting a district from public burdens to say that the people are poor?
40499	Was it any unusual thing to call for the yeas and nays?
40499	Was it consistent with the warmth which had been discovered, to say that all this discussion, all this length of time, had been consumed upon nothing?
40499	Was it for this the soldier watched his numerous nights, and braved the inclemency of the seasons?
40499	Was it in the opposition to the minority of the Senate and the general voice of the people against the treaty that that_ firmness_ was displayed?
40499	Was it intended to have the constitution republished, and the alterations inserted in their proper places?
40499	Was it not already settled in the constitution and by existing laws?
40499	Was it not better to fill up the old corps, than to put ourselves to the inconvenience of raising a new one?
40499	Was it not necessary for them to consult, and fix upon a proper place?
40499	Was it not the ecclesiastical corporations and perpetual monopolies of England and Scotland?
40499	Was it not then urged by members of that House that the British nation refused to negotiate with them?
40499	Was it not to substantiate the truth of them by a vote?
40499	Was it right that when a man had led our armies to victory, and returned, that he should be immediately stripped of his commission?
40499	Was it they who formed the constitution?
40499	Was it to be wondered at, if this swarm should raise a buzz about him?
40499	Was it to remain as a pledge for the performance of the other?
40499	Was it wantonly to throw away a privilege and natural right?
40499	Was merit, then, to be the less regarded, because it was modest?
40499	Was not peace the most to be desired, especially in our present situation?
40499	Was not the good of the public his principal object?
40499	Was not this representation true, he asked; could it be controverted?
40499	Was not this returning good for evil?
40499	Was not this true of all the great and essential powers of government?
40499	Was one branch to be judges of discretion for another?
40499	Was the Executive to trust the defence of a country to a militia formed under such a law?
40499	Was the Message then alone referred as it is now proposed by some gentlemen?
40499	Was the money, he asked, to have remained in the hands of the banker in Europe?
40499	Was the property less changed by the law of a sovereign and independent State, than by the proclamation of a British commander?
40499	Was there any other country which could give us the same supplies we wanted?
40499	Was there no security against a wanton abuse of these enormous powers?
40499	Was there no security in the watchful guardianship of such a character?
40499	Was this depreciated paper freely accepted?
40499	Was this insinuation pointed at Congress or the Executive?
40499	Was this paper equal in value to gold or silver?
40499	Was this the case?
40499	Was this the object of the reference to the Secretary?
40499	Was this, he asked, an exposition of the meaning of the constitution?
40499	We have no doubt been cruelly treated; but we have made proper application for redress, and received an answer?
40499	We refer, said he, to the wisdom of the Senate; but how is this superior wisdom to be discerned?
40499	Were dollars, he asked, to be balanced by absolute appropriations?
40499	Were not hundreds of Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and almost of every other denomination, among our enemies?
40499	Were not the archives, records, deeds,& c., which had also fallen into the hands of the enemy, their property?
40499	Were not the latter as necessary as the former?
40499	Were our citizens in a state of organization as militia?
40499	Were our magazines and arsenals properly supplied?
40499	Were our ports and harbors in any tolerable state of defence?
40499	Were the Committee of the Whole to turn authors and write a dissertation on part of the constitution?
40499	Were the Senate so chosen?
40499	Were the advocates of this doctrine aware of its consequences, when they advanced it?
40499	Were the citizens of the Northern and Eastern States to dictate to Congress on a measure in which the Southern States were so deeply interested?
40499	Were the people jealous of this House, and not of the other branches?
40499	Were there any petitions on the subject excepting that from the Pennsylvania Society and a few Quakers?
40499	Were they called upon to give an opinion?
40499	Were they to propose such a plan as this to us, would it not be received with indignation?
40499	Were we not bound to take as much care of our own interest, as of that of other people?
40499	Were we to demand satisfaction?
40499	Were women and fatherless children to be regarded as traitors?
40499	What are the emigrant nobility to renounce?
40499	What are the rights of conquest?
40499	What are these powers?
40499	What are they to bring back in return?
40499	What are they to do if they are discharged?
40499	What are you?
40499	What authority has this House to explain the law?
40499	What clause is it that gives this power in express terms?
40499	What could be more immoral than war?
40499	What could he know of the Government the moment he landed?
40499	What could induce this grant?
40499	What denominations formed the thousands of new levies, that endeavored to deluge our country in blood?
40499	What did the House meet for at all?
40499	What did they want to do with it?
40499	What difference, he asked, was there on that occasion and the present, when the French just adopted and organized a new government?
40499	What does it import?
40499	What effect would this doctrine, if admitted, have upon the State governments?
40499	What equivalent do we receive for this sacrifice?
40499	What evidence have we that the demand will stop there?
40499	What good did his renunciation of title do, excepting that it afforded him a short opportunity of deceiving his fellow- citizens?
40499	What good end could have been answered by a war?
40499	What had been our situation ever since the negotiation?
40499	What had been the custom of the House heretofore?
40499	What has been the conduct of Great Britain, in relation to her funds?
40499	What has carried the credit of that kingdom to a superior eminence, but the attention she has paid to public credit?
40499	What has he left her to ask, what has he not surrendered?
40499	What have Congress to do with the acts of States?
40499	What if he refuses to answer at all?
40499	What is a law?
40499	What is now his answer?
40499	What is now our prospect?
40499	What is patriotism?
40499	What is the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate?
40499	What is the centre of wealth, population, and territory?
40499	What is the charge?
40499	What is the object for which men enter into society, but to secure their lives and property?
40499	What is the object of the address before us?
40499	What is the present case?
40499	What is the present situation of our commerce?
40499	What is the purport of the memorial?
40499	What is the situation of Florence in consequence of this event?
40499	What is the situation of those who are implicated in the causes of the failure?
40499	What is the usual means of acquiring property between man and man?
40499	What is there in the Treaty that could humble us so low?
40499	What is there to discharge the Government from the payment?
40499	What is to be done for compensation?
40499	What is to be done while the impeachment is depending?
40499	What is your name?
40499	What is your usual place of residence?
40499	What justifies these harsh epithets?
40499	What kind of a business would this be?
40499	What kind of reasoning was this, or how did the gentleman propose to reconcile it?
40499	What man is there here that can be wicked enough to involve his country in such incalculable miseries?
40499	What may Great Britain expect, if we will not settle our differences by negotiation?
40499	What may be the consequence of binding a man to vote in all cases according to the will of others?
40499	What may we expect will be the conduct of our own citizens?
40499	What must have passed, he asked, between the soldier, the militiaman, or farmer, and the purchaser?
40499	What occasion, then, can there be for them?
40499	What reason could be adduced for acting?
40499	What reason could the purchaser assign for offering £10 for a paper which specified an obligation to pay £100?
40499	What reason is there for any such supposition?
40499	What right had the House to say to a particular class of people, you shall not have that kind of property which other people have?
40499	What security can there be for a commerce thus precariously conducted, in which your rivals are your judge?
40499	What then are we called upon to do?
40499	What then is the officer to be responsible for, which should induce the House to vest in him such extraordinary powers?
40499	What then remains of your constitution, except its mode of organization?
40499	What then should we have done?
40499	What then will be the case?
40499	What was it drove our forefathers to this country?
40499	What was the allegiance, as a citizen of South Carolina, he owed to the King of Great Britain?
40499	What was the case in the present instance?
40499	What was the conduct of gentlemen?
40499	What was the conduct of this society when the first news of the late insurrection reached them?
40499	What was the effect of the embargo in 1794?
40499	What was the event?
40499	What was the present measure?
40499	What was the representation to do?
40499	What was the situation of the people of America, when the dissolution of their allegiance took place by the declaration of independence?
40499	What was their interest, then?
40499	What was this consideration?
40499	What weapons have we which can reach her?
40499	What were the powers and privileges of the House on the subject?
40499	What were the steps then taken in that parallel case?
40499	What will the assignee lose by the measure?
40499	What will their constituents think of them?
40499	What will this comprehend, or, rather, what will it not comprehend?
40499	What would be the consequence, said Mr. B., of refusing at this time, and under these circumstances, to receive this State into the Union?
40499	What would be the effect of a contrary doctrine?
40499	What would be the effect of such an act of Parliament?
40499	What would follow from this?
40499	What( he asked) was their situation, and what had they to fear in case of an open rupture with Great Britain?
40499	What, he asked, could be the end of all these things but war?
40499	What, he asked, were these?
40499	What, he further asked, would become of our produce, in the event contemplated?
40499	What, let me inquire, will be the pernicious consequences resulting from the establishment of this doctrine?
40499	What, said he, are we about to do?
40499	What, said he, is its object?
40499	What, said he, would be the consequence of such construction?
40499	What, sir, is the intention of this business?
40499	What, then, becomes of its strength?
40499	What, then, permit me to inquire, can the power of treating effect?
40499	When Britain has been at the trouble of stipulating a peace for Portugal, will she suffer that nation to assist us?
40499	When a million of dollars had been expended, were the House to give them fifteen or twenty thousand dollars more?
40499	When an exasperated militia went out, what were we to expect, but that the first man with a red skin whom they met would be shot?
40499	When did their citizenship commence?
40499	When it was laid before them, it was then contended that the House had a right to interfere in the Treaty, or why ask for it?
40499	When you first cut a man''s throat, and thereafter call him a rascal, do you suppose that your accusation will affect the man''s reputation?
40499	Whence arises, then, the opposition?
40499	Where are they to be formed?
40499	Where could be the pretence for any thing of this sort?
40499	Where did these gentlemen find that definition of treason?
40499	Where does the conciliating temper of Great Britain manifest itself?
40499	Where has that power been placed?
40499	Where is it?
40499	Where is that will to be found?
40499	Where is the breach of faith in Government, if it paid its whole debt with justice, blended with mercy?
40499	Where is the denomination amongst us, that did not furnish opposers to our glorious Revolution?
40499	Where is the difference between this case and that of indemnifying the losses at sea by the British?
40499	Where is the justice of doing more for the assignee than he or his assignor expected could or would be done?
40499	Where is the man among us who has the presumption and vanity to expect it?
40499	Where is the propriety of branding a measure of this nature with epithets of infamy?
40499	Where must they look in the United States for the sovereign power?
40499	Where should they find that power in Great Britain?
40499	Where then is it to be found?
40499	Where then?
40499	Where was the money to come from?
40499	Where were the benefits of peace, if they were still to keep up our War Establishments?
40499	Where, he asked, is the proof of this allegation?
40499	Where, then, are the real profits anticipated?
40499	Where, then, is the danger of expressing a general approbation?
40499	Wherefore was it provided that no duty should be laid on exports?
40499	Whether a like conciliatory conduct has not been observed by the advocates of manufactures?
40499	Whether it was to be a fleeting vision, or to continue for ages?
40499	Whether the public opinion was four or five times more unfavorable to such an administration?
40499	Whether they shall be under the direction of Commissioners?
40499	Which of these alternatives have they elected to do?
40499	While the British had acted with so much liberality, did it become Americans to stick at the paltry sum of seventeen thousand dollars?
40499	Who are benefited by the revolution?
40499	Who are those that say to us, Germantown is the most proper spot that can be selected?
40499	Who constituted this class of citizens?
40499	Who did not believe that such an event was not only possible, but in some degree probable?
40499	Who fought the battles of Georgia, under Clark and Twiggs?
40499	Who fought the battles of New Jersey?
40499	Who fought the battles of South Carolina, under the command of an honorable member now present?
40499	Who had been the cause of the posts being so long kept from the United States?
40499	Who had the most produce to sell?
40499	Who has firmness enough to meet so foul a deed?
40499	Who has not heard of the rebellion of_ Shays_, where a great deal of property was destroyed?
40499	Who have fought the Indians so often with success, under Generals Wilkinson, Scott, Sevier, and others?
40499	Who marched in 1776 under General Rutherford, through the Cherokee nation, laid waste their country, and forced them to peace?
40499	Who shall declare what is the law, when the learned gentlemen of the bar are so directly opposed to each other?
40499	Who suffers by this use of our authority?
40499	Who were the purchasers?
40499	Who were to be the losers, under these circumstances?
40499	Who will accuse me of wandering out of the subject?
40499	Who will hereafter admit an excise officer into his house, if that house may, with impunity, be burned about his ears?
40499	Who will say that I exaggerate the tendencies of our measures?
40499	Who will suffer most?
40499	Who will trace these inferences, and pretend that we may have no share, according to the argument, in the Treaty- making power?
40499	Who, under mere motives of friendship, would have done so?
40499	Why a reference?
40499	Why all this particular deviation from the common line of business to pass random votes of censure?
40499	Why are they called upon to say, yea or nay, if they are obliged to say yea?
40499	Why borrow money?
40499	Why did the United States contract with the State, if she had no right?
40499	Why did they not leave that, which they call God''s work, to be managed by himself?
40499	Why do n''t you indemnify British depredations out of the British property that is within your grasp?"
40499	Why is it necessary to fix upon Philadelphia for ten years?
40499	Why is this penalty imposed on the United States?
40499	Why lay a duty on foreign nails, when they can not rival you if you make them as good and as cheap?
40499	Why leave a phantom of discretion, an unreal mockery of power, in the hands of the Legislature?
40499	Why leave it only to be implied?
40499	Why not also fix the principles of Government?
40499	Why not choose the Speaker of this House?
40499	Why not come forward, and demand of us the power of Legislation, and say, give us up your privileges, and we will govern you?
40499	Why not protect this property as well?
40499	Why not tell them at once, and in plain English, you must renounce your titles before you can have the privileges of an American citizen?
40499	Why not?
40499	Why shall we liquidate a debt which is established upon a complete and final settlement?
40499	Why should a man take a dangerous and a doubtful path, when a safe one presents itself?
40499	Why should we interfere with the concerns of our sister States who have not yet joined the new Government?
40499	Why so little jealousy of the Executive Department, separated by the constitution with so much care from us?
40499	Why so?
40499	Why then provide for it a second time?
40499	Why then should we interfere in the business?
40499	Why this harsh language?
40499	Why use so hackneyed a word?
40499	Why was the call delayed till the session was within a few weeks of its termination?
40499	Why was the subject mentioned?
40499	Why were the resolutions brought before the House?
40499	Why were these rights ever maintained and so scrupulously attended to by the people of those countries?
40499	Why were we afraid to intrust the PRESIDENT with the power of raising ten thousand men?
40499	Why were you so long in presenting your petition?
40499	Why will these people, then, make use of arguments to induce the slave to turn his hand against his master?
40499	Why, especially, he asked, should they give rise to invidious comparisons between themselves and the other branch?
40499	Why, let me ask gentlemen, shall we commit an infraction of the constitution for fear the Senate or President should not comply with its directions?
40499	Why, only that this was his opinion; but is that authority here?
40499	Why, said Mr. L., communicate the instructions to the Ministers?
40499	Why, said Mr. S., will not the Eastern members indulge us in this trifle?
40499	Why, then fix the price as if the whole Army was to be kept there?
40499	Why, then, are we called upon to propose amendments subversive of the principles of the constitution, which were never desired?
40499	Why, then, call for them?
40499	Why, then, did he suffer the bill to pass the committee in silence?
40499	Why, then, embarrass themselves by making a larger appropriation than was necessary?
40499	Why, then, expend so much precious time unnecessarily?
40499	Why, then, hazard words that infer it?
40499	Why, then, is a period of ten years to expire, previous to going there?
40499	Why, then, make this rant about the British?
40499	Why, then, shall we be told that the negative is the safe side?
40499	Why, then, should such particular attention be paid to them, for bringing forward a business of questionable policy?
40499	Why, then, should the House search for a meaning, to make the constitution inconsistent with itself, when a more rational one is at hand?
40499	Why, then, will gentlemen advocate a doctrine so obnoxious to the principles of the constitution, when a more favorable construction is at hand?
40499	Why, therefore, all this extraneous argument about a point of so easy decision?
40499	Why_ firmness_?
40499	Will Virginia set all her negroes free?
40499	Will a duty of ten dollars diminish the importation?
40499	Will any one answer by a sneer, that all this is idle preaching?
40499	Will any one deny that we are bound-- and I would hope to good purpose-- by the most solemn sanctions of duty for the vote we give?
40499	Will gentlemen say it is"We the people"in this case?
40499	Will gentlemen then say, that to gratify a thoughtless regard for economy, they will risk the most invaluable part of the Government?
40499	Will gentlemen, said he, blast this prospect by rejecting the bill?
40499	Will gentlemen, then, comply with the one, and neglect the other?
40499	Will he live in a more expensive style than the former Presidents of Congress, or will he live nearly in the same?
40499	Will he not feel some dread that a change of system will reverse the scene?
40499	Will he submit, after having gained his point at the expense of property and the loss of constitution, to have those sentiments established?
40499	Will it be said that we are unable to do it?
40499	Will it be whispered that the Treaty has made me a new champion for the protection of the frontiers?
40499	Will it materially affect the price of rice or tobacco?
40499	Will it not alarm our fellow- citizens?
40499	Will it not be subversive of every principle on which public contracts are founded?
40499	Will it not give them just cause of alarm?
40499	Will it not have probably a contrary effect, and be the means of increasing the evil tenfold more than it exists at present?
40499	Will it restore value to the evidences of that debt held by our creditors?
40499	Will not gentlemen weigh well that vote, that may possibly increase the number of mourning widows and helpless orphans?
40499	Will not precluding them look like a wish to smother all further inquiry into the matter?
40499	Will not the administration of public affairs be conducted in future by representatives as good as ourselves?
40499	Will not their traders continue their old acquaintanceship with them in spite of us?
40499	Will not these people who suffered by the Tories in the last war come next, with open mouths, and demand indemnity?
40499	Will she make her countervail oppressive and unjust?
40499	Will she not expect that we shall resort to more violent measures-- such as reprisal, sequestration, or stopping of intercourse?
40499	Will such a scheme increase it?
40499	Will the Senate refuse to make an acknowledgment of that kind?
40499	Will the strength and riches of the country be to the north or to the south of the Susquehanna?
40499	Will the tendency to Indian hostilities be contrasted by any one?
40499	Will the treatment be better than usual?
40499	Will they be reported in such a form even?
40499	Will they contribute any thing by consuming imported spirits?
40499	Will they do it against the State of North Carolina?
40499	Will they expose themselves to be preyed upon by these men?
40499	Will they give up the money they cost them, and to whom?
40499	Will they have less wisdom or virtue, to discover and pursue the good of their fellow- citizens than we have?
40499	Will they make the representation of the several States the rule by which it shall be apportioned?
40499	Will they not have to pay taxes from the time they settle amongst us?
40499	Will they not say, that they have been deceived by the convention that framed the constitution?
40499	Will they rack- rent their tenants in such a manner as to deprive them of the means of improving the estate?
40499	Will they refuse to sell us their manufactures?
40499	Will they submit to an excise?
40499	Will they tamely submit to be robbed of their property, when they lose all hope of aid or protection from the Government?
40499	Will this prevent an increase of the public debt?
40499	Will this reconcile the minds of our people to the General Government?
40499	Will you adopt a charge against him, which is in its nature an imputation that however lightly and wickedly made, will implicate perhaps innocent men?
40499	Will you gain by this contest?
40499	Will you restrain him from having access to the members out of doors?
40499	Will you return to every other person exporting dutied goods the money he has paid, and will you refuse the poor fisherman?
40499	Will you shelter yourself under the plea of necessity?
40499	Will you then raise a force to drive them off?
40499	Will you, he observed, permit, nay, invite him, whom you arraign at the bar of this House, to be a public accuser?
40499	With respect to the more absolute government of France, where has this power been lodged?
40499	With what degree of consistency can the House be called on for a vote if, as some members contend, they can not have an opinion?
40499	Woodfall, a celebrated printer, took down debates from memory: could we prevent this being done here?
40499	Work for a living?
40499	Would Congress have had the power to naturalize, if it had not been expressly given?
40499	Would any body say that French liberty was better secured by naming a harbor_ Havre de Marat_?
40499	Would any jury in this country say, that the matter of fact and the principles of law were not in favor of the petition?
40499	Would any legislature endeavor to introduce into a former act a subsequent amendment, and let them stand so connected?
40499	Would any man call this a communication from the Executive?
40499	Would any man risk the feelings and character of his friend by an attempt to force a vote of thanks by a bare majority through the House?
40499	Would any man say that the sole object of self- created societies has been the publication of political doctrines?
40499	Would any one doubt that Congress may lend money, that they may buy their debt in the market, or redeem their captives from Algiers?
40499	Would any plain man suppose that this bill had any thing to do with trade?
40499	Would arguments of this kind satisfy our constituents, if they should find themselves suddenly plunged into an expensive and ruinous war?
40499	Would even the citizens of the other States, which did not possess this property, desire to have all the slaves let loose upon them?
40499	Would gentlemen narrow the operation of the constitution in this manner, and render it impossible to be executed?
40499	Would he have pledged his honor, his reputation, had he been interested?
40499	Would he not, though absent, have acquired, according to the petitioner''s own positions, a right of citizenship?
40499	Would it add to his fame to be called after the petty and insignificant princes of Europe?
40499	Would it be proper to give an approbation that can not be appropriate, and that has no definite meaning?
40499	Would it be prudent to trust a foreigner, perhaps a rival, if not an enemy, with your supply of what has emphatically been called the sinews of war?
40499	Would it have been best to have traded with them upon sufferance, and so to have maintained a precarious kind of commerce?
40499	Would it not expose us to exorbitant demands, and often a refusal?
40499	Would not Congress have been in the same situation as before the signing of the provisional articles?
40499	Would not a Treaty made under it be clearly the law of England?
40499	Would not such a step be injurious even to the slaves themselves?
40499	Would not the end of impeachment be defeated by this means?
40499	Would not the measures have been reprobated with one voice, and the Treaty considered as a nullity?
40499	Would our foreign creditors believe we were scrupulously fulfilling our engagements with them?
40499	Would styling him His Serene Highness, His Grace, or Mightiness, add one tittle to the solid properties he possessed?
40499	Would the citizens of that country tamely suffer their property to be torn from them?
40499	Would the makers of shoes be content to go there and retail them?
40499	Would they not say, a vote of thanks has been rejected?
40499	Would twelve of this House, or would any jury in the country say that the war continued longer than hostilities?
40499	Yes, said he, we have still a constitution, but where is it to be found?
40499	Yet are they not thought to be justified by national policy?
40499	You declare yourself not guilty?
40499	_ Executive Departments._--Resolution respecting, 85; debate thereon, 85; how many departments shall be established?
40499	_ Treasury Department._--Debate, 90; shall this important department be in the hands of a single officer or in a Board of Commissioners?
40499	_ ad valorem_, paid, as it were, in an exclusive manner, by the State of Massachusetts, be equal?
40499	a pretence to cover their ambition?
40499	and did we assure ourselves of the full execution of the law?
40499	and if we make them such grants every year, do we not in fact become tributary to them?
40499	and that the hope of the justice we now ask for has delayed the sale of all the rest, to satisfy his creditors-- his Southern creditors?
40499	and was not the member from Virginia( Mr. MADISON) of this opinion, as I have before stated?
40499	and was not this merely because the Indians were unable to pay for themselves?
40499	and whether, if they are not, it is expedient for them to exercise this discretion at this time?
40499	and would not all acts of Parliament, prior and repugnant to it, be repealed by it?
40499	and, had not his colleague( Mr. LIVINGSTON) quoted the secret Journals of the House?
40499	duty, with freight and shipping charges, be sufficient encouragement?
40499	if not, what proportion?"
40499	interest should be paid on it, 196; if the Government is one party and the individual the other, who is the judge?
40499	on his capital; and that capital tenfold?
40499	on his capital?
40499	or the plundering of the high seas legalized under the name of privateering?
40499	or to whom?
40499	or using such harsh expressions as have issued like a torrent from a gentleman on the other side of the House?
40499	or whether we shall tamely supplicate for justice, and suffer the most effectual means of compulsion to elude our grasp?
40499	or will posterity have a more favorable opinion of the original, because it has been amended by distinct acts?
40499	that Mr. Rutledge has prevented executions from taking the Georgia estate by his personal interference?
40499	that all the estates in Rhode Island and New Jersey are sold?
40499	then is it wrong to express their confidence?
40499	what can the committee report?
40499	what is money, when put in competition with the lives of our friends and brethren?
40499	what would be gained by it?
40499	whether repugnance to a compliance with such demands was not created by such means?
40499	why adopted?
40499	would not carry away slaves at that time in possession of Americans?
47289	Did you give this advice to your American correspondents, upon the supposition that America would acquiesce in the Orders in Council? 47289 For what reason?
47289	Have you lately written to your correspondents in America respecting shipments of American produce to this country? 47289 If the American embargo in general were taken off, and the Orders in Council to be continued, would his trade in that case revive?
47289	In what degree would it affect the dealers in those commodities brought to this country, as to their remittances to this country? 47289 In what manner?
47289	Is she?
47289	To what effect have you so written? 47289 Washington, sir, was not a lawyer, and who can wonder that his fair mind was alarmed by such a solemn declaration?
47289	What is the reason that the Orders in Council prevent the witness sending our cotton goods in ships in ballast? 47289 Who can be so cruel as to refuse him this favor?"
47289	Why not? 47289 Would the Orders in Council have any other effect as to discouraging the trade?
47289	& c.& c. If a parcel of kegs, in those days, alarmed them so much, what will Fulton''s torpedoes do now?
47289	100; why then should they not be manned?
47289	128; is this House to have no influence on the conduct of the Executive?
47289	138; is this House sitting as a body to remunerate those who violated the laws?
47289	138; the subject of contribution considered, 139; let the inquiry be made, 139; what good purpose can it answer?
47289	146; have not the British subjects been liberated?
47289	146; what connection exists between the statements that have been made and the merits of the case?
47289	146; what has been the situation of Great Britain to Spain?
47289	148; what influence was his opinion to have?
47289	149; has Congress a right in order to determine the title to landed property, to refer it to any tribunal whatever?
47289	157; this bill is a concession to Great Britain and is not a hostility to France, 157; what injuries has France done?
47289	172; letter of Mr. Jackson, 172; what does it amount to?
47289	189; not the true principle, 189; what principles are more specifically asserted by Great Britain?
47289	194; if such were the circumstances, does not the occasion require that the American Government take a firm and decided stand?
47289	196; did he know that Mr. Erskine had not full power?
47289	196; it was not his duty to know that he had not full powers?
47289	201; what are the expressions in which it is conveyed?
47289	218; is the experiment worthy to be made?
47289	256; what is the nature and import of this proclamation?
47289	262; is the proclamation an authorized measure of war and legislation?
47289	262; what, then, is the true construction of the treaties of St. Ildefonso and of April, 1803?
47289	281; what is a corporation such as the bill contemplates?
47289	282; the States have the exclusive power to regulate contracts, 282; what participation has this bank in the collection of the revenue?
47289	28; what are our preparations?
47289	28; what is the state of the treasury?
47289	28; what plans are offered for replenishing it?
47289	294; what did mechanics here say relative to granting this charter?
47289	29; consequences of non- intercourse under such circumstances, 30; who has been the first aggressor?
47289	29; if we are to have war, with whom is it to be prosecuted?
47289	29; under these circumstances what is the course that policy would dictate to this country to pursue?
47289	2d, is it expedient?
47289	354; as to France, what are the edicts revoked, and how?
47289	359; are we prepared for those conditions?
47289	368; are we bound by any faithful performance had on the part of France?
47289	368; have either France or Great Britain complied with the condition?
47289	369; is this an honest neutrality to revive the restrictive system against Great Britain, while the French decrees are still in force?
47289	369; must this sacrifice be made in order to bolster up the President''s proclamation so prematurely issued?
47289	369; the present measure is intended as a propitiatory sacrifice to conciliate Napoleon, 369; is it calculated to produce this effect?
47289	372; under the act of May, 1810, 372; what is its character and the obligations arising under it?
47289	373; the occurrence of the fact of revocation involves the propriety of the proclamation, 373; has the fact occurred?
47289	388; has a similar temper and disposition been shown to Great Britain as to France, in the interpretation of the Cadore letter?
47289	407; who are most interested in commerce; the growers of the articles, or the factors, or freighters employed in their exchange?
47289	434; it would be necessary to know the ulterior views of the committee, 434; for what purpose are these troops wanted?
47289	448; gentlemen will not say, we have not a good cause for war, but insist that it is our duty to define it, 448; what do they mean by this?
47289	475; in such statutes there are always exceptions, 475; what would be the course of an individual?
47289	600; where is your commerce to protect?
47289	603; what were the preparations for the Revolutionary war?
47289	624; is there probability of obtaining a recognition of this principle by a continuance of the war?
47289	636; were ever a body of men so abandoned in the hour of need as the American Cabinet by Bonaparte?
47289	698; what did an elevated fitness of character and conduct require of this nation when war was declared?
47289	6; it was a farce, 6; ample time had been given for her to make other arrangements, 6; what accounts have we from there?
47289	70; what are the reasons why the embargo has not come fully up to the expectations of its supporters?
47289	70; yet it has been particularly serviceable in many instances?
47289	75 Blind Alice; A Tale for Good Children, 38 Ellen Leslie; or, The Reward of Self- Control, 38 Florence Arnott; or, Is She Generous?
47289	84; it is not expedient to adopt the second resolution, 84; what will be the effect of the embargo, if continued, as respects ourselves?
47289	A people presenting such an aspect, what have they to expect abroad?
47289	A possession_ by force_?
47289	A serious invasion?
47289	Accompanied with this most consequential inquiry:"Is not this a new State to be admitted?
47289	After the declaration of war, had they any disposition to assail us?
47289	After the declaration of war, what has been the conduct of the Executive?
47289	Again, I ask, were the principles of the embargo submission in 1774-''5-''6?
47289	Again, sir, I would ask the advocates of the doctrine I am reprobating, when will it be proper to show the folly and ruinous consequences of the war?
47289	Again, sir, has the gentleman no feeling for the sufferings, no ear for the groans of our suffering seamen?
47289	Again, what was the effect of the non- intercourse in 1809 upon our Treasury?
47289	Against France?
47289	Against whom were these charges brought?
47289	Against whom?
47289	All the evasions of the embargo have been made with a view to that supply; enforce it, and from whence will they procure the article of lumber?
47289	Am I not, then, Mr. Speaker, authorized to say, that the condition of the law of May, 1810, has not been complied with?
47289	Am I then required to vote for a measure of this kind?
47289	Am I to conclude that they are really Americans in principle?
47289	An ambitious General might corrupt his army, and seize the Capitol-- but will an Admiral reduce us to subjection by bringing his ships up the Potomac?
47289	And I would ask whether either of these events had happened when this corps of militia were ordered out?
47289	And about what?
47289	And are gentlemen considering the restoration of the seamen taken from the Chesapeake as a reason why we should continue the interdict?
47289	And are gentlemen prepared to obey?
47289	And are we not in the act of yielding obedience?
47289	And are we prepared to pronounce so heavy a denunciation on our predecessors, on ourselves, and the other great Departments of our Government?
47289	And are we so sunk in the estimation of the mighty conqueror, that he thinks it necessary and proper to use this as his official language towards us?
47289	And are we, he asked, to be deprived of it when we come to this House-- when we enter this temple of liberty?
47289	And are we, under such circumstances, to renew negotiation by extra missions?
47289	And are you now about again to jeopardize the peace of this nation, without any cause whatever?
47289	And are you ready to repeal the embargo under such a threat as this?
47289	And as to excuse, will it be said that there is nothing of the sort in this case?
47289	And by whom was it opposed?
47289	And by whom were they made?
47289	And could any thing be gathered from any thing they had ever written or said, to induce a belief that this Government had not acted with sincerity?
47289	And did this state of prosperity exist at a time when your commerce was protected by vessels of war?
47289	And do I enjoy my right of walking the street by making myself a prisoner?
47289	And do gentlemen believe Great Britain is willing to sacrifice all these considerations to a refusal to do you justice?
47289	And does she not remain sole mistress?
47289	And for whom?
47289	And from what premises is such a conclusion drawn?
47289	And have we adopted the monkish plan of scourging ourselves for the sins of others?
47289	And have we no means of doing this?
47289	And here, Mr. Speaker, let me ask what other class of men in our society can you find who would have acted thus nobly?
47289	And how do I prove it?
47289	And how has it been regarded by the belligerents?
47289	And how is this proved to be a remedy?
47289	And how was it to be effected?
47289	And how would this bill, Mr. Q. asked, less violate the constitution than such an act would have done?
47289	And how, sir, is it attempted to rebut this fact?
47289	And if it did, and this power was offensive, why was it not stricken out when the amendment was made?
47289	And if it has, is it proper so to decide it?
47289	And if not greater, has not an allowance been made for the capture of some of our ships, or, in other words, for the building of new ones?
47289	And if they be, sir, what inducement can possibly prevent unanimity on the present occasion?
47289	And if they do not intend thus to rely, in what possible way could it serve that Government thus darkly to insinuate it?
47289	And in comparing this bill with those declarations, will it be possible to conceive that we are consistent?
47289	And in fact does it not so demand in many instances?
47289	And is it come to this?
47289	And is it not better to submit to some inconveniences, eventually to insure a free trade?
47289	And is not a man thereby to be deprived of property without due process of law?
47289	And is not here an express authority?"
47289	And is the President to judge from the thanks of the House that he has done his duty?
47289	And is this bill a pioneer to the new swarms of"continental"locusts?
47289	And it may be fairly asked here, what measures Great Britain has taken to prevent her officers from impressing our seamen?
47289	And lastly, will the force be an economical one?
47289	And may we not suppose that these proud Spaniards, as they are called, may have feelings of a like nature?
47289	And must this sacrifice be made in order to bolster up the President''s proclamation so prematurely issued?
47289	And now, let me ask, whether we are prepared for these conditions?
47289	And on the question, Shall this bill pass?
47289	And on the question,"Shall the bill pass?"
47289	And on the question,"Shall this bill pass?"
47289	And on what, sir, does this circulation rest?
47289	And pray, Mr. Speaker, what has Mr. Foster been sent for?
47289	And shall we be told about the profitable commerce with Great Britain?
47289	And shall we disparage our ancestors?--shall we bastardize ourselves by placing them even below the brigands of St. Domingo?
47289	And shall we now refuse admission to the vessels of France?
47289	And surely he will not contend that this advance of premium was caused by the embargo?
47289	And that from mere obstinacy-- an obstinacy not encouraged by the least glimmering of hope?
47289	And that too, sir, at an expense to their own country so enormous in amount?
47289	And thus situated, what are the projects offered for replenishing the public coffers in future?
47289	And we may triumphantly ask, where is the nation or people that enjoy these with more freedom and safety than the American people?
47289	And were not French ships of war then, and have they not since been riding quietly at Annapolis, Norfolk, and elsewhere?
47289	And what advantage do they derive from it?
47289	And what are those objects?
47289	And what do we?
47289	And what do we?
47289	And what does he claim?
47289	And what does this committee do?
47289	And what has this sarcastic Minister of Great Britain given us in exchange?
47289	And what have we done in return?
47289	And what have we to propose, according to the principles of reprisal, to obtain the restoration?
47289	And what injury has the Emperor of Russia done to him?
47289	And what is it now?
47289	And what is its character?
47289	And what is our opinion?
47289	And what is the answer to all this out of doors?
47289	And what is the argument by which this position is maintained?
47289	And what is the language of George the Third, when our Minister presents to his consideration the embargo laws?
47289	And what is the relation in which you stand to France?
47289	And what is to justify this measure of imposing silence?
47289	And what more, sir, could have been asked of us, required, or granted, than is contained in these offers?
47289	And what real benefit has resulted from it to the Government?
47289	And what says Mr. Jackson in reply?
47289	And what security have we that she will not do so?
47289	And what substitute have we for this when it shall be destroyed?
47289	And what was the fact in regard to them?
47289	And what would you think of one individual who had thus conducted to another, and should then retreat?
47289	And what, Mr. Speaker, is now proposed for the future-- what is to retrieve our affairs-- on what are our hopes to rest?
47289	And what, sir, are you doing?
47289	And what, sir, was the conduct of the opposition in the British House of Commons, when their King and country were insulted by a foreign Minister?
47289	And when war came, what said the people?
47289	And where are these insults, these injuries, these vital attempts of the enemy to be found?
47289	And where do you send him?
47289	And whether we are prepared to go to war for them?
47289	And while these measures were going on, could Congress, by staying here constantly, add to the number of men, or expedite the loan?
47289	And who is prepared to say that American seamen shall be surrendered the victims to the British principle of impressment?
47289	And who would pay it?
47289	And whose money, asked Mr. R., is this?
47289	And why did they not?
47289	And why draw that into the debate on the impressment of American citizens from American vessels?
47289	And why should this bank be dissolved?
47289	And why should this clamor be raised on the question whether you will or will not make a formal renunciation of the old articles of political faith?
47289	And why should we make a sort of hotch- potch of two subjects, on which we do not think alike, for the purpose of getting us all united against both?
47289	And why was not a provision inserted to prevent foreigners from purchasing additional stock?
47289	And why?
47289	And will she be insensible to the efforts of our little Navy?
47289	And will you plunge yourselves in war, because you have passed a foolish and ruinous law, and are ashamed to repeal it?
47289	And will you refuse it?
47289	And with a standing army, what security for our liberties?"
47289	And would gentlemen favor this French population at the expense of their own interests and rights?
47289	And would he advise the nation to pursue a course disgraceful, and to which he would not expose himself?
47289	And would not the doing this place us in precisely the same situation as we were in before the Revolution?
47289	And would these persons believe that they were going on an unlawful expedition?
47289	And yet, how does this differ from invading Canada, for the purpose of defending our maritime rights?
47289	And yet, sir, who ever heard of two nations_ going to war_ about a single case of capture, though admitted not to be justified by the laws?
47289	And, I ask, is this resistance?
47289	And, I ask, sir, why, then, admit the vessels of England standing in the same relation to us?
47289	And, I wish to know, sir, what control we have over the Bank of the United States?
47289	And, after that, is it proposed that we shall continue the measure of hostility when the cause alone which led to it is completely done away?
47289	And, are we to endeavor to negotiate, as neutrals, with France, upon this ground, with any reasonable prospect of success?
47289	And, doing that, how could you expect an amicable result?
47289	And, is this course of policy now to be condemned, and regrets entered up that we have not been at war years ago?
47289	And, said Mr. O., shall the Government be less willing to discharge its just debts than an honest individual?
47289	And, shall I be charged with deserting the standard of the people, while I am treading in the footsteps of the great Father of his Country?
47289	And, sir, what does this bank or its branches when resort is had to it?
47289	And, sir, what is the mighty boon which these brave and indigent tars ask from you?
47289	And, sir, what is this principle?
47289	And, sir, what was our"restrictive"system?
47289	And, sir, when these messengers of hell are sent here shall we not look at them?
47289	And, upon whom does the loss fall?
47289	Are gentlemen aware how extensive is the province of master and apprentice?
47289	Are gentlemen ready to injure their country, weaken our Federal Union, the sheet- anchor of our political safety, to reach their political opponents?
47289	Are gentlemen serious?
47289	Are gentlemen willing to submit to this?
47289	Are gentlemen, possessing the feelings of Americans, prepared to submit to such degradation?
47289	Are new States desired?
47289	Are not these cases equally strong?
47289	Are not these searches and seizures, without warrant, on the mere suspicion of a collector, unreasonable searches and seizures?
47289	Are our Ocean rights there?
47289	Are the bounty lands to be given in Canada?
47289	Are the countries of the Baltic and Caspian Seas no longer cultivated?
47289	Are the extravagant prices of articles of the first necessity, superadded to their former embarrassments, to operate as a bounty on their trade?
47289	Are the gentlemen from Georgia and Kentucky the only Senators who have had their feelings wounded by the conduct of the press upon this subject?
47289	Are the merchants the guardians of the public honor?
47289	Are the merchants to be told we will protect their commerce?
47289	Are the old chimerical notions of_ starving_ the enemy, yet floating in the brains of gentlemen?
47289	Are the orders and decrees altered?
47289	Are the people of this country suspected of an intention to abandon their rights or their independence?
47289	Are the wishes of this nation to be unattended to?
47289	Are these apprehensions founded in reason, or are they the chimeras of a fervid and perturbed imagination?
47289	Are these blessings not worth preserving?
47289	Are these not sufficient for the recruiting service?
47289	Are these savings not worth notice?
47289	Are these the blockades which are intended?
47289	Are they likely to happen?
47289	Are they not murderers?
47289	Are they prepared to say the embargo shall be raised, while our commerce is subjected to this kind of depredation?
47289	Are they reduced to that situation, that they will become the vassals of a foreign power-- for what?
47289	Are they to be held as conquered territories?
47289	Are they to be scourged out of us by the birch of the unfledged political pedagogues of the day?
47289	Are they unfit for the East India trade?
47289	Are we bound to adopt this measure on account of the faith of Government being pledged to France by the law of May last?
47289	Are we guilty because we resist the British scalping knife?
47289	Are we in France?
47289	Are we not aware, sir, of the immense sums now invested and actively employed in the different manufactories distributed over our extensive country?
47289	Are we not officially notified that the French leeward islands are declared by proclamation in a state of blockade?
47289	Are we prepared to ingraft these arbitrary principles into our constitution, and cherish them when practised in so arbitrary a manner?
47289	Are we ready to submit to be taxed by Great Britain and France, as if we were their colonies?
47289	Are we sure the State banks can or will do this?
47289	Are we to adhere to the embargo forever, sir?
47289	Are we to renew negotiation, then, when every circumstance manifests that it would be useless?
47289	Are we to understand that the_ salus populi_ shall rule without control?
47289	Are we, gentlemen,( said Mr. R.,) to have a Speaker of the House of Representatives without any election?
47289	Are you prepared to see a foreign power seize what belongs to us?
47289	Are you provided with means to annoy the enemy, or to defend yourselves?
47289	Are you to leave them unprotected, or will you draw the sword in their behalf?
47289	Are you to spend four or five millions of dollars, in addition to your present extraordinary expenditures, to protect commerce?
47289	Are your exposed towns fortified and garrisoned?
47289	Are your seamen safe from impressment?
47289	Arm your merchantmen, as has been proposed, send them out, and you have war directly?
47289	As his Minister said to the King of Epirus,"may we not as well take our bottle of wine before as after this exploit?"
47289	As it does now, through the operation of your embargo, on the planter, on the farmer, on the mechanic, on the day- laborer?
47289	As the proper authority, he thrust it from him as unworthy the coffers of his country; and did not his doing so meet general approbation?
47289	As to France, sir, what were the edicts to be revoked, and how revoked?
47289	As to preparation at home, which is the only preparation contemplated to make, what or whom is it against?
47289	As to respect abroad, what course can be more certain to insure it?
47289	As to the objection which had been offered to receiving the statement of their commanders, what were gentlemen afraid of?
47289	As to the opportunity which the answers afforded for debate, could any one say that sufficient latitude had not been taken in debate?
47289	At the very moment, said Mr. B., that we know that the blacks of St. Domingo are building vessels, shall we dispose of Our public armed vessels?
47289	Aware of the impropriety of his deciding, he tells you-- what?
47289	Aye, sir-- and is that true?
47289	Because he is not a gentleman, shall we assert a falsehood?
47289	Because we can not guard against every possible danger, shall we provide against none?
47289	Because we can not, are we to succumb to others?
47289	Begin this system of abstract legislation, and where are you to stop?
47289	Being questioned if Henry had mentioned the names of any person with whom he had conferred?
47289	But I am asked, how will you contend with a maritime nation, without a navy?
47289	But I may ask, what on the ocean did we enjoy but by the sufferance of Great Britain?
47289	But I will suppose that you could export without interruption; would the whole of the exportable produce pay for the war during the continuance of it?
47289	But are not your privateers as much a part of the naval force of the nation as your ships of war?
47289	But are we unreasonable in expecting, before we give up the old opinion, to hear some argument in favor of the new one?
47289	But by whom had they been suppressed when they ran counter to the interests of his country?
47289	But can any man imagine that, if we invade the British colonies, the war will be there?
47289	But did an atom of it flow in from the operation of the embargo?
47289	But does that justify this resolution?
47289	But gentlemen were desirous now to fix the number of souls which should entitle to a Representative-- and why?
47289	But has he shown that it is necessary in order to make a preliminary arrangement similar to that entered into?
47289	But have the people of Spain acquiesced?
47289	But have they shown, by a train of argument, that their overthrow was, in any degree, ascribable to their maritime greatness?
47289	But how are we to cause these rights to be respected?
47289	But how can this be done?
47289	But how has this plea been supported?
47289	But how is this protection to be afforded?
47289	But how was it received by the American Cabinet?
47289	But how, Mr. Speaker, are we to cause our rights to be respected?
47289	But if it were not, where is the impropriety of an inquiry?
47289	But in this instance is the territory vacant-- or uninhabited-- or abandoned by its proprietors?
47289	But is it possible that an intolerant spirit of party has prepared us for this?
47289	But is it true that according to the usages of nations this is a novel system, or one now, for the first time, put in use by the British?
47289	But is that the case in relation to the Executive, on whose future dispositions rest the best interests of this nation?
47289	But is war the true remedy?
47289	But of what value would these provinces be to us, if they could be easily acquired?
47289	But on whose side has this intrigue been?
47289	But receiving all the sanctions of a law, and as such containing a rule of conduct in certain specified cases, what was the Executive to do?
47289	But shall we therefore abandon the ocean, yield our birthright, our goodly heritage, without a struggle?
47289	But should he, on great questions, be denied the privilege of speaking?
47289	But should we have been prepared by winter, the time to which gentlemen wished to have deferred the declaration of war?
47289	But some gentlemen affect a sympathy for the Canadians-- why, say they, will you make war on them?
47289	But suppose they do not; suppose they fail, and are captured in the attempt; what is that to us?
47289	But the question recurs, needful for what?
47289	But to what does this doctrine lead?
47289	But was there that fatal necessity; that command from Jove,"Ye fates fulfil it, and ye powers approve,"to erect corporations?
47289	But we are told that the enterprising merchant is deprived of an opportunity-- of what?
47289	But we must inquire, what is a just and necessary war?
47289	But were there not other decrees?
47289	But what are the reasons why it has not fully come up to the expectations of its supporters, as a measure of coercion?
47289	But what blow are you prepared to strike?
47289	But what can we do with four seventy- fours?
47289	But what does the correspondence referred to prove?
47289	But what has_ Revolutionary_ Spain done?
47289	But what have the British Government done on the subject?
47289	But what is here proposed?
47289	But what is the fact?
47289	But what is the law of nature and the dictate of wisdom, on this subject?
47289	But what is the nature of the defence which one of our large States may be supposed interested to obtain from the General Government?
47289	But what is the principle in contest between the two Governments?
47289	But what is their situation at present?
47289	But what is this law as modified by the practice of nations?
47289	But what obliges Congress to give credit at all?
47289	But what was left, as to her, for the surrender or repeal of which she had any anxiety?
47289	But what was the style in which gentlemen spoke at our last summer session, when the subject of approbation was then before us?
47289	But what will the merchants of Salem, and Boston, and New York, and Philadelphia, and Baltimore, the men of Marblehead and Cape Cod, say to this?
47289	But what, said Mr. C, has been the history of claims for four or five years past?
47289	But what, sir, is the price we have at length paid for the repeal?
47289	But whence, Mr. Chairman, proceeds this system of slander and abuse?
47289	But where is the difference between that and suffering yourself to be controlled by the arbitrary act of another nation?
47289	But while we are searching for the means of annoying the commerce of Britain, does it become us to overlook at this moment the condition of our own?
47289	But who was ever the friend of non- intercourse?
47289	But why is it necessary to know, on this occasion, whether the President did call for these powers or not?
47289	But why is it to be continued?
47289	But why this argument of despair?
47289	But why this change?
47289	But why, sir, are the injuries these nations have done contrasted, and those of the one made an apology for those of the other?
47289	But why, sir, should this House give an expression of approbation of the President?
47289	But will you trust your funds with an institution thus precarious, and whose solidity is distrusted even by its best friends?
47289	But"where, and what was this execrable shape-- if shape it may be called, which shape has none?"
47289	But, I ask, sir, if the State Governments do not possess this gigantic power?
47289	But, I would ask the gentleman from Connecticut, and the gentleman from Pennsylvania, also, if this be one of their abstract propositions?
47289	But, Is it necessary that a resolution containing it should be passed by this House?
47289	But, Mr. President, what is the real cause of those failures?
47289	But, Mr. Speaker, what was the fact?
47289	But, Mr. Speaker, wherefore change the term of enlistment, from five years, or during the war, to one year?
47289	But, are not the measures which have been adopted, submission?
47289	But, decide it either way, how is trading as far as we have ability, made less abject than not trading at all?
47289	But, for these things, we must stipulate an equivalent; and what can that be, but to unite in striking England from the list of independent nations?
47289	But, for what purpose are you to send them out?
47289	But, is it in this nation, and at this time, that it can be supposed that the profits of commerce are confined to the merchant?
47289	But, it seems we have changed all this-- we have perverted the whole course of procedure-- and why?
47289	But, it would be well to inquire, on what principle the belligerents pretend to justify these commercial restrictions?
47289	But, on the other hand, should we not be ready to act on that day, is it not pledging ourselves that we will then act, whether we are ready or not?
47289	But, on the second head, can your law be executed?
47289	But, said Mr. R., is time now so precious?
47289	But, said he, for what purpose, I feel impelled to ask, are you going to build these vessels?
47289	But, says the gentleman, will you take the child from the parent?
47289	But, since that election, another has taken place for members of Congress; and how has that turned out?
47289	But, sir, admit for a moment the bank may be formed to collect the revenue, ought it not to be exclusively used for that object?
47289	But, sir, admit the gentleman''s statement; will a war with Great Britain increase the danger?
47289	But, sir, can we quit this subject without looking more particularly at the consequences which result from this series of injuries?
47289	But, sir, gentlemen may ask, where is the remedy?
47289	But, sir, has this unparalleled enterprise, this gallant spirit, been carried on by a navy?
47289	But, sir, how happens it that we still remain under the distresses occasioned by the belligerents?
47289	But, sir, how have those orders at last been repealed?
47289	But, sir, is it prudent to rely upon an institution that may refuse you assistance?
47289	But, sir, let me ask what sort of possession?
47289	But, sir, let me ask, whether the disposition to lend be not as necessary a means towards accomplishing a loan as the ability?
47289	But, sir, let us admit the fact and the whole force of the argument, I ask whose is the fault?
47289	But, sir, what has been the state of the country since the declaration of war?
47289	But, sir, what is now the state of things?
47289	But, suppose they had been manned in other ways, were not privateers as useful in annoying the enemy as public ships?
47289	But, what are the principles more specifically asserted by Great Britain?
47289	But, what best consults the honor of a Republican Government?
47289	But, what have we done?
47289	But, what is that to us?
47289	But, what security did those ships afford?
47289	But, what was it sent there for?
47289	But, why, I pray you?
47289	By Mary Howitt, 38 Who Shall be Greatest?
47289	By a suitable instrument I reconvey or retrocede the estate called Louisiana to you as I now hold it, and as you held it; what passes to you?
47289	By force?
47289	By gentlemen who are for active offence?
47289	By granting them a right which nature has already given to them?
47289	By putting in force the non- importation law?
47289	By showing a physical disability in the country to avail itself of this force?
47289	By the law of''98, the President certainly could direct relative to the age and size of a recruit-- yet to whom did he apply?
47289	By what ligament, on what basis, on what possible foundation, does it rest?
47289	By what?
47289	By whom is it so called?
47289	By whom is this immense power wielded?
47289	By whom, would you listen to them, are they most keenly felt?
47289	By whom?
47289	Can England complain of our giving credit to a man with whom her first Secretary of State and the Governor General of Canada correspond?
47289	Can a violation of a solemn pledge confer an obligation which was only intended to be created on the complete fulfilment of that pledge?
47289	Can an agreement arising from the exercise of this power, supersede the right of exercising the power expressly delegated by the constitution itself?
47289	Can any man do this, and not realize that the destiny of the people inhabiting such a country is essentially maritime?
47289	Can any man tell what would be the consequence of war, in these times?
47289	Can any one doubt that our Cabinet meant that it should have this effect?
47289	Can any submission be more palpable, more"abject, more disgraceful?"
47289	Can any thing be more in direct subserviency to the views of the French Emperor?
47289	Can any thing be more obviously at variance with the spirit of the constitution and the first principles of civil liberty?
47289	Can any thing be more palpable than this?
47289	Can arming our merchant vessels, by resisting the whole navy of Great Britain, oppose force to force?
47289	Can it be any thing but the revolutions in Spain and Portugal?
47289	Can it be because Bonaparte has said he loves the Americans?
47289	Can it be conceived that all this could have been carried on, if General Miranda had not meant to conceal it from the Government?
47289	Can it be necessary gravely to answer these assertions?
47289	Can it then be said, that with treble the population, and in an offensive war, necessity requires the dangerous innovation?
47289	Can one million of militia be overpowered by thirty thousand regulars?
47289	Can such conduct be called American?
47289	Can such men pretend that peace is their object?
47289	Can that be true which gives the greatest violence to party animosity?
47289	Can that be true which, when the whole physical force of the country is needed, withdraws half of that force?
47289	Can that, then, be true in relation to war which would be reprobated in every other case?
47289	Can the Legislature give me a moral right to violate the Constitution of the United States, which I have sworn to support?
47289	Can the President be as well acquainted with the qualifications and abilities of officers in the militia as the Governors of the States?
47289	Can the fundamental principles of the constitution, rendering contracts sacred, be thus uprooted and destroyed?
47289	Can there be any necessity for this?
47289	Can they sell these lots, these brick houses, these canal shares?
47289	Can they touch no nerve in which Britons feel?
47289	Can they, or will they, prevent the march of an enemy''s forces through that territory into the United States?
47289	Can this be a desirable state of things?
47289	Can this be done?
47289	Can this ever be an alternative?
47289	Can this interdiction be defended on this ground?
47289	Can we do too much for this man?
47289	Can we wonder that it should be cherished by its master?
47289	Can you expect system and order unless you pay for it?
47289	Can you have economy when you go into market to bid for what you want?
47289	Can you punish them for not doing it?
47289	Can your law fail of producing more injury and loss to the United States, than benefit?
47289	Contending themselves for the right of naturalization, can the British Government deny it to others?
47289	Could America expect to starve this nation?
47289	Could Congress transfer to him legislative power, and authorize him to declare of how many members this body should consist?
47289	Could any man say that it was not proper that he should have it?
47289	Could any man say what would take place between this day and the third of March?
47289	Could it not demand prompt payment of the duties?
47289	Could not a single foreign frigate enter almost any of our harbors now and batter down our towns?
47289	Could not even a single gunboat sweep some of them?
47289	Could not the Territory of Columbia have been governed without erecting a single corporation in it?
47289	Could one be added to the catalogue?
47289	Could seven millions of people obtain glory by precipitating themselves upon half a million, and trampling them into the dust?
47289	Could that gentleman repose his head upon his pillow without returning thanks to God that he was descended from English parentage?
47289	Could they have chosen a more appropriate phraseology?
47289	Could this doctrine be asserted by any gentleman?
47289	Did Venice owe her decline, or fall, to her navy?
47289	Did a British gallery ever exhibit such a spectacle?
47289	Did ever one Government exhibit towards any people a more bloody and relentless spirit of rancor?
47289	Did he too oppose this proposition on the ground of resisting the belligerents or of making war with England?
47289	Did it arrest the promulgation, or has it abrogated the Orders in Council-- those orders which have given birth to a new era in commerce?
47289	Did it declare to how many Representatives each State should be entitled?
47289	Did it enter into the conception of the people when its principles were discussed?
47289	Did it follow that minor considerations should be placed out of view or yielded up entirely?
47289	Did it not interdict all trade with France under the most severe and heavy penalties?
47289	Did it prevent Mr. Jefferson from taking a war course?
47289	Did it prevent the unmanly attack upon the Chesapeake?
47289	Did it produce starvation in the West Indies?
47289	Did not the honor, the character, the independence of the country require of us to go back to our original neutral ground?
47289	Did not the late President, when he came into place, refuse to let such money come into the treasury in the case of the worthless Callender?
47289	Did not this bill completely come up to their wishes?
47289	Did our fathers either effect a change in her injurious policy or prevent a war by non- intercourse?
47289	Did that make no difference?
47289	Did the nation call it submission when it was enacted under General Washington?
47289	Do gentlemen believe it to be true?
47289	Do gentlemen consider harpooning a vessel to be like harpooning a whale, which has no men on board of it to take out the harpoon?
47289	Do gentlemen mean an abject acquiescence to those iniquitous decrees and Orders in Council?
47289	Do gentlemen of the"old school"undertake to say that the Father of their country submitted then to George III.?
47289	Do gentlemen plead the necessity of the case?
47289	Do gentlemen say that there is no insult in this?
47289	Do gentlemen suppose that boats can approach without the most imminent danger?
47289	Do not gentlemen perceive the tendency of this measure to involve us with the States upon delicate points?
47289	Do the wrongs of this nation end with this outrage?
47289	Do these gentlemen come forward and tell you that that the embargo is submission?
47289	Do these two declarations hang together, sir?
47289	Do they contend that the causes which rendered it necessary have been removed?
47289	Do they mean that it should be relinquished to our former masters without a struggle?
47289	Do they not bear a hostile aspect?
47289	Do we doubt the inveteracy of the French hatred of the British navy when it has existed so many years?
47289	Do we not pay an annual tribute to Algiers for liberty to navigate the sea safer from its corsairs?
47289	Do we want plunder?
47289	Do you intend again to stretch them on the rack, again to cover the country with sackcloth and ashes?
47289	Do you make this declaration to the enemy at the outset?
47289	Do you mean to submit?
47289	Do you persevere in the conquest of Canada?
47289	Do you see one gentleman, one solitary gentleman of one party, discriminated generally as a Federal, who does not vote for this measure throughout?
47289	Do you yet contend that the object is to protect commerce?
47289	Does France purchase your tobacco or cotton, which heretofore have found a market there?
47289	Does a necessity exist superior to the laws?
47289	Does a proffer of settlement, connected with such language, look like a disposition or an intention to conciliate?
47289	Does an unprotected seacoast of two thousand miles afford her no opportunities of attacking us?
47289	Does any gentlemen believe, even allowing the pressure of the embargo to be great upon her, that she can yield, that she can afford to yield?
47289	Does any man believe it?
47289	Does any man believe that this frontier traffic is not as beneficial to us as to our enemies?
47289	Does any man doubt that the war is justly undertaken?
47289	Does he believe he has all this time been deceiving the Legislature?
47289	Does he discharge as he ought the duties of a friend, a brother in society?
47289	Does he recollect the invasion of the Spaniards two years ago?
47289	Does it comport with our honor and dignity to admit into our ports and harbors the very vessels destroying our commerce?
47289	Does it fall within the power to pay the debts of the United States?
47289	Does it follow, from that, that they are entitled to all the rights of hospitality that one nation could possibly show to another?
47289	Does it follow, in all cases, that that which would have prevented the war in the first instance should terminate the war?
47289	Does it not confine the legality of arming to resident citizens alone?
47289	Does it not go, not only to the abandonment of the ocean, but to the seacoast also?
47289	Does it not then result, inevitably, as the dictate of common prudence, that we should, as soon as possible, commence our naval preparations?
47289	Does it, then, become the representatives of the nation to leave the nation at the mercy of a corporation?
47289	Does not England naturalize foreigners?
47289	Does not flour find a great proportion of its consumption on the continent?
47289	Does not the constitution say, no laws shall be passed abrogating contracts?
47289	Does not the industry of the country languish?
47289	Does not the right to create a bank, which shall issue this representative of money, come within the same reason?
47289	Does not this prove that so much danger existed on the ocean that it was next to impossible to pass without seizure and condemnation?
47289	Does she not naturalize your citizens?
47289	Does she produce them at home?
47289	Does the bank affect the people locally?
47289	Does the gentleman mean to assimilate a tribute exacted by Great Britain with that paid to Algiers?
47289	Does the gentleman mean to excite our fears for the loss of our property?
47289	Does the gentleman say that it was atrocious in 1798 to defend ourselves against the French?
47289	Does the history of the past in our own, or any other country, warrant such an expectation?
47289	Does the prospect of security there flatter us?
47289	Does this prove a change?
47289	Does this prove that the embargo was the cause of the change of the politics of the Maryland Legislature?
47289	Does this, sir, comport with the principles of justice?
47289	Does your flag float afterwards in honor?
47289	Even if the price was as low as eight, or say seven dollars, wherefore should the soldier receive less than any other man?
47289	First, has the United States a claim, either real or disputed, to this territory?
47289	For I would ask, what are we to promise to ourselves from such a system as this; what will be the probable effects of it?
47289	For a private, unassisted, insulated, unallied individual?
47289	For any great boon that this Government has received from the hands of Great Britain?
47289	For gallons will you spill torrents; or am I to understand that we shall have war without bloodshed?
47289	For what have you given money to build fortifications?
47289	For what purpose were protections given to American seamen?
47289	For what purpose, sir, let me ask, have we adopted the resolution preceding this?
47289	For what purpose, then, could they be wanted?
47289	For what reason are we to subject even our coasters to plunder and abuse?
47289	For what was he contending?
47289	For what was the object of the opposition in this debate?
47289	For what, sir, are we assembled here under a constitution the purest in the world?
47289	For whose benefit, sir, is the Government to strip itself of this right, so essential for the due administration of its finances?
47289	For why?
47289	Forty thousand?
47289	From these principles what desertions have we not witnessed?
47289	From whence was this conclusion drawn?
47289	From which decision Mr. RANDOLPH moved an appeal; which being seconded, the question was put,"Is the decision of the Chair correct?"
47289	From which of these stations, said Mr. C., could she have spared, with safety and prudence, a portion of the force employed?
47289	GOLD.--The first object with a wise Legislature is, Is the law expedient?
47289	Gentlemen ask, has there not been a satisfactory adjustment of our differences with Great Britain?
47289	Gentlemen get up and abuse the Spanish Government and people, and what then?
47289	Good heavens, between what, Mr. Speaker?
47289	Ground their arms and surrender themselves prisoners of war; or are they, sir, to drop their muskets and take to their heels?
47289	Had Congress that power?
47289	Had he done it?
47289	Had it not been more injurious to the United States than to foreign nations?
47289	Had not a special court been refused in relation to a property of much greater value than this?
47289	Had not gentlemen even called others by name, and introduced every subject on any question?
47289	Had not the Navy of Great Britain a beginning?
47289	Had the decrees been so modified, under present circumstances, as that they had ceased to violate our neutral commerce?
47289	Had the interdiction been confined to British vessels by this law, what would Great Britain have said to this discrimination?
47289	Had they not amply redressed the insult of the individual?
47289	Had they not had them in other countries?
47289	Had we, when all the rest of Louisiana was surrendered to us, obtained possession of Florida?
47289	Has France herself agreed to bury her surplus breadstuffs in the earth?
47289	Has Great Britain held out the hand of friendship, and have we refused to meet her?
47289	Has a picaroon or a buccaneer ever been chastised by them?
47289	Has any capitalist said he would venture out in the present tempest which blackens the ocean?
47289	Has any malediction of Heaven doomed them to perpetual vassalage?
47289	Has it come to this?
47289	Has it occurred?
47289	Has it operated upon the present Executive?
47289	Has it operated, to any perceptible extent, except upon ourselves, during the twelvemonth it has been in existence?
47289	Has it released from galling and ignominious bondage one solitary American seaman, bleeding under British oppression?
47289	Has not Congress solemnly pledged itself to the world not to surrender our rights?
47289	Has not Great Britain driven them all from the ocean?
47289	Has not our country increased in wealth and population, in a superior degree to any country on earth?
47289	Has not the British army increased with equal pace with her navy?
47289	Has not the United States''Bank produced serious alarm?
47289	Has not, in fact, the gallant Captain Decatur taken our own seamen out of one of them?
47289	Has our hospitality been violated and our officers insulted in our very ports by the vessels of France?
47289	Has she not seized every vessel which has arrived at her ports since that period?
47289	Has she withdrawn her Orders in Council, and have we insisted on a continuance of our commercial restrictions?
47289	Has the Nile ceased to fructify the fields of Egypt?
47289	Has the President acted correctly or not?
47289	Has the President given any such information?
47289	Has the embargo answered?
47289	Has the experiment been tried?
47289	Has the love of gain superseded every other motive in the breasts of Americans?
47289	Has the navy of Russia protected her commerce?
47289	Has there been any thing of the kind on our part?
47289	Have Sicily and the Barbary coasts returned to a barren state of nature?
47289	Have either complied?
47289	Have gentlemen reflected on the disastrous consequences of such a system at the present time?
47289	Have our citizens been restored to their country?
47289	Have they attempted even to show that there exists in the nature of this power a necessary tendency to destroy the nation using it?
47289	Have they been committed within our waters?
47289	Have they brought forward the mass of their voters as signers to petitions?
47289	Have they disturbed the quiet of either House?
47289	Have they ever refused supplies because a war was unpopular, since their revolution?
47289	Have they not considered it a delicate one?
47289	Have they not done so in Baltimore?
47289	Have they not in their conduct given us the most sound and wholesome advice on the subject?
47289	Have they not more troops on and near the line than we have?
47289	Have they not told you, continually, to let them alone; that they knew their own business best?
47289	Have they taken a single man out of a ship of war, or one man out of the dungeons of Paris or Arras?
47289	Have this Government, and the people of this country, no interest in the prosperity of these manufactories?
47289	Have those causes wrought on her a perseverance in her measures?
47289	Have those certificates, or protections, as they are commonly called, been confined to_ bona fide_ American citizens?
47289	Have those contingencies happened?
47289	Have we any French frigates now in our seas?
47289	Have we any other evidence of the disposition of the Executive in relation to this bill than that certain gentlemen are in favor of it?
47289	Have we constitutional authority to legislate on this subject, and is it expedient so to do?
47289	Have we done nothing?
47289	Have we done this, as respects Great Britain?
47289	Have we from the effects of their trial any lively hope of success in our present attempt?
47289	Have we gone to insurance companies or corporations of one kind or another?
47289	Have we indeed received no answer?
47289	Have we intrigued with the people to induce them to take sides with us?
47289	Have we made an impression on the Prince Regent and his Ministry?
47289	Have we no country of our own?
47289	Have we not already territory enough?
47289	Have we not an undoubted right to navigate the Mediterranean?
47289	Have we not conclusive evidence to the contrary?
47289	Have we not, moreover, the best recorded proof that the present President holds similar opinions on this subject?
47289	Have we obtained the objects for which it was commenced?
47289	Have we opened our ports to her traders?
47289	Have we renewed commercial intercourse with her?
47289	Have we stirred up the people into town meetings to aid us by memorials?
47289	Have you an army or navy which can make any impression?
47289	Have you any thing to hope, by operating upon the minds of the rulers of that nation, a conviction that you are boasting no longer?
47289	Have you ever heard of an army on earth that was carried into the field before it had been seasoned in the camp?
47289	Have you not as good a right to do that as to pass this law?
47289	Have you the least prospect, if you declare war, of attacking Canada this season?
47289	He asked if we were prepared to violate the public faith?
47289	He asked what will be the situation of this people in sixty days?
47289	He asked whether we were prepared to assail our enemy, or repel her attacks?
47289	He asked, how efficient could that species of force be, of which the Chief Magistrate did not think it worth while to have a record kept?
47289	He asked, what security had the United States, if they did all this, if they submitted to such abject humiliation, that Great Britain would treat?
47289	He asked, whether it is wise in an unarmed nation, as we are, to commence hostilities against one so completely prepared?
47289	He asked, why rush with this precipitancy into the war?
47289	He demanded what there is in the nature and construction of maritime power to excite the fears that have been indulged?
47289	He had satisfied his mind that they had engaged in this business unknowingly and unwillingly-- and, what was now asked of the Government?
47289	He said, there were two parties in this House; and asked, is it ever known how a question will be decided, until it is taken?
47289	He sees the danger clearly?
47289	He supposes a sally from a Spanish garrison upon the American forces, and asks what is to be done?
47289	He sympathized with the sufferings of his impressed and incarcerated fellow- citizens; but would a territorial war exempt them from impressment?
47289	He was asked if any essential alterations would be made within sixty days, in the defence of our maritime frontier or seaports?
47289	He wished to know, in point of principle, what difference gentlemen could point out between the abandonment of this or of that maritime right?
47289	He would ask that gentleman if he was, during the last embargo, a ship owner?
47289	He would, for instance, ask whether so much as related to sacked towns, bombarded cities, ruined commerce, and revolting blacks, had been realized?
47289	How abstract, I pray you?
47289	How are these orders and decrees to be opposed but by war, except we keep without their reach?
47289	How are these pacific advances met by the other party?
47289	How are they to be supplied with the article of salt?
47289	How are we to get things right?
47289	How can we get rid of the war, if we may not say that it is inexpedient, impolitic, and ruinous?
47289	How can we make a sacrifice of our own opinions?
47289	How comes he in the ranks against us, with his tomahawk and scalping knife?
47289	How could one committee properly attend to the mass of business before the Committee of Commerce and Manufactures?
47289	How could they be made one with the United States unless by the use of the same language?
47289	How did this happen?
47289	How distressed?
47289	How had it turned out?
47289	How had this indisposition for war got into the House?
47289	How happens all this?
47289	How has it been applied?
47289	How has the President performed this constitutional duty?
47289	How has this prediction been verified?
47289	How is he to know that they have expressed their sense of his conduct from proper motives?
47289	How is it now?
47289	How is it submission, then, to these orders for us to trade to Gottenburg, when neither France nor Britain command, nor prohibit it?
47289	How is our faith plighted?
47289	How is our honor affected by removing it?
47289	How is that to be done?
47289	How many were unable to apply?
47289	How shall the law be repealed?
47289	How shall we best do it?
47289	How stand the people of the British Empire?
47289	How then can any encouragement be drawn from that precedent, to support us under the privations of the present system of commercial suspension?
47289	How then can we trust to the future predictions of gentlemen?
47289	How then has it happened that Congress has taken upon itself the right to erect light- houses, under their general power to regulate commerce?
47289	How was it in the conspiracy of Blount and Liston?
47289	How wide- spread the relation in the community?
47289	How, I ask, could the President act a different part, from the evidence in the case?
47289	How, let me ask you, sir, is your Government constituted?
47289	How, sir, can I make this matter plainer?
47289	How, sir, is it with the State banks?
47289	How, then, could the gentleman, after his admissions, with the facts before him and the nation, complain?
47289	How, then, is the national faith plighted to France by that law?
47289	How, then, sir, are we to account for their late conduct?
47289	I ask gentlemen, if her ability to carry on a distant war by land or sea, has diminished?
47289	I ask him whether he considers the impressment of American seamen"a violation of an essential right of this country?"
47289	I ask if it is necessary?
47289	I ask the gentlemen on the other side of the House, whether we have not gained something in this respect by the war?
47289	I ask then what physical ability we have to discharge the State taxes, or any other?
47289	I ask this House and this nation, whether their hopes or wishes extend beyond what we then enjoyed?
47289	I ask whether, under such circumstances, the question ought not to be considered settled?
47289	I ask you, sir, where is the strength of which these nations formerly boasted?
47289	I ask you, then, sir, why do we hesitate?
47289	I ask, did any nation ever do more?
47289	I ask, now, whether the impression made by the gentleman from New York was a just one?
47289	I beg to be excused for asking him( for I know he scorns submission as much as any man) if submission will pay the public debt?
47289	I have been asked, shall Congress rise and do nothing?
47289	I have no idea of laughing the subject out of the House; but how can gentlemen see the least probability of success in the invention?
47289	I know, sir, that there are men who condemn the conduct of the President in issuing the proclamation; and why?
47289	I make the appeal to gentlemen, I demand of the chairman of the committee who reported this bill, why and wherefore it is presented?
47289	I might trace the scheme a little further back, and ask, whence the outrages?
47289	I now solemnly appeal to gentlemen, why shall we, at this moment, make this marked distinction?
47289	I pray you, was not that the condition of the country when Mr. Rose arrived?
47289	I request gentlemen to reflect, whether this is not, in point of fact, an abandonment of the other points in dispute?
47289	I say, perish the heart, the head and the tongue, that will attempt her justification or apology?
47289	I shall, however, examine the non- intercourse system from the date of the law of March, 1809, and inquire what was its professed object?
47289	I will admit, sir, that this is not the time or place to institute the general inquiry, whether banks are or are not beneficial to a nation?
47289	I will ask how many regiments you have in your present establishment?
47289	I will ask the gentleman from South Carolina, what has the nation benefited for this enormous expenditure?
47289	I will ask the honorable gentleman from Maryland whether he does not know that letters have been written for that purpose?
47289	I will ask, how we succeeded in the Revolutionary war?
47289	I will ask, in return, when an officer is appointed to collect the customs, has he not a salary and emoluments?
47289	I will ask, what would be the case if such laws had not been passed by the States?
47289	I will now proceed, Mr. President, to inquire whether the facts stated in the resolution are supported by the correspondence upon which it is founded?
47289	I will put this question to gentlemen: what has Britain done which would require a discrimination as to her public vessels?
47289	I wish to know of gentlemen, whether trading with the belligerents, under their present restrictions on commerce, would not be submission?
47289	I would ask, how can it be contended to the contrary?
47289	I would ask, in a few words, if we ought to continue this establishment in its present state?
47289	If B refuses, does A, under the circumstances of such a declaration, violate any obligation, should he refuse to permit the passage?
47289	If France has revoked her decrees, is not a non- importation with Great Britain inevitable, and does it not exist?
47289	If France revoked her decrees, she was entitled to a non- importation against Great Britain, and if she failed to revoke, what?
47289	If a gentleman from Baltimore gives his agent instructions to provide every thing necessary for an East India voyage, what would he expect?
47289	If a man submits, of what use are calculations of money, for it may be drawn from him at the pleasure of his master?
47289	If done, has it been so done as to amount to an honorable fulfilment or acceptance of our terms?
47289	If gentlemen will have it that this is the accepted time for war, how has it happened that we have not had it before?
47289	If he did not feel perfectly comfortable in a cold day, should he therefore divest himself of all clothing?
47289	If he wished to promote division, how could he better attain his object than by denouncing the people of a particular section?
47289	If her Legislature possess it not, can they give it to a Senator?
47289	If it is possible to operate on France by commercial restrictions, let me ask if this bill will not accomplish that object?
47289	If it was indispensably necessary a day or two ago to provide a revenue, what had since occurred obviating that necessity?
47289	If it was not to have influence, why thus evade a decision on the prayer of the petitioner?
47289	If it would, to what amount?
47289	If justice be not already established in our country, can there be any probability that a more formidable army will effect an object so desirable?
47289	If not, then what is meant by this grant to take the property of your constituents, and leave them no remedy for the injury?
47289	If obligations of friendship do exist, why does Great Britain rend those ties asunder, and open the bleeding wounds of former conflicts?
47289	If obtained, will it accomplish the end proposed?
47289	If on such a question the House was to be governed by individual interests, what was the nation to expect from them?
47289	If our Government takes away our liberty, is it necessary to contend with a foreign Government for our rights?
47289	If our towns could not be defended by fortifications, he asked, would ten frigates defend them?
47289	If provision was made for trying this case, must it not be extended to all others?
47289	If she can turn our vessels into her ports to pay duty and take out license, what prohibits us from doing the same as to her vessels?
47289	If she has it not, can she give it to her Legislature?
47289	If so, did he not go to England during the embargo?
47289	If so, how can we rely on them against a foe invading our country?
47289	If so, how did he go?
47289	If so, what will be the effect on the articles of cession and agreement between you and Georgia?
47289	If so, why not give the same credence to the letters of the Duke of Massa and the Duc de Gaete?
47289	If so, why not unite against the one as well as against the other?
47289	If so, would not a fleet secure us from attack also?
47289	If such doctrine is to be admitted, when should we have had a moment''s peace?
47289	If the alleged principle of retaliation be not the true one, what is?
47289	If the article of the constitution, however, did not mean that Congress might take States out of new Territories, what did it mean?
47289	If the decree existed in April, 1811, why was it not communicated to this nation, the only one interested in the subject?
47289	If the present establishment is not full, what is the reason?
47289	If the right to land be indefeasible, could the Government run a road through it?
47289	If their existence had been known at the time, would the President in his message recommending an embargo have failed to notice the fact?
47289	If then assistance should be offered on the part of the constitutionalists, what is your army to do?
47289	If this law were passed, Mr. W. asked, was it perfect?
47289	If this law were to pass, could the Secretary of State be authorized to declare the number of Representatives to which each State was entitled?
47289	If this principle, then, be equally urged by both, who is to judge between them?
47289	If this was the fact, as the committee appear to have believed, I ask, in what their case differs from that of men taken captives by the Algerines?
47289	If this were not her object, why such a continued system of illegitimate blockades?
47289	If we are to have war, with whom is it to be prosecuted-- not in terms I mean, but in fact?
47289	If you did not at once return blow for blow, and injury for injury, would you not at least take a little time to consider?
47289	If you mean war, if the spirit of the country is up to it, why have you been spending five months in idle debate?
47289	If you settled at all, might you not consider it your duty in some way to make him feel the consequences of his strange intemperance of passion?
47289	If your citizens are united, you can capture Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick; when you have effected this, what remains next to be done?
47289	If, as some gentlemen say, it is a precursor to war, there were some very serious questions to be asked-- What is the situation of our fortresses?
47289	If, at so early a period, the right of search for men was objected to by this Government, how much more forcible is the objection now?
47289	If, said Mr. C, we are not able to meet the wolves of the forest, shall we put up with the barking of every petty fox that trips across our way?
47289	If, sir, the sufferers under the sedition law did suffer contrary to the constitution, ought not their expenses to be reimbursed?
47289	If, then, it be inexpedient to make this discrimination against Great Britain, how is it less so, when directed against France?
47289	If, then, while creating a public debt, we neglect to provide the means of payment, what will be the consequence?
47289	In a word, is resistance submission?
47289	In a year from the time of enlistment their term expires, and what becomes of your conquest, without force to keep it, supposing it to be made?
47289	In bank bills, the credit of which is at least doubtful?
47289	In despite of experience, do they yet believe that our blessed country_ alone_ can produce food for the world?
47289	In other words, why the number of officers should now be fixed agreeably to the act of April 21, 1806, rather than that of the 3d of March, 1801?
47289	In peace we require no defence, and shall we declare war in order to defend ourselves?
47289	In performance of their lofty promises, in disregard of sacred duties, what have they done?
47289	In point of revenue how does it work?
47289	In relation to negotiating with measures of coercion in existence, Mr. N. asked, when did the violations of our rights commence?
47289	In spite of all its boasted effects, are not the two nations brought to the very brink of war?
47289	In such case, what will you do?
47289	In such case, would staying at home, and refusing any more to go upon the sea, be an exercise of independence in the citizens of New York?
47289	In the Revolutionary war how did England stand-- how her islands?
47289	In the commencement of this inquiry, Mr. Chairman, we naturally ask ourselves, what edicts are to be revoked, and how are they to be revoked?
47289	In the days of terror, we shrunk at standing armies; and what is the object now-- defence?
47289	In the intermediate period, what aspect does a Union, thus destitute of cement, present?
47289	In the name of God, Mr. Speaker, what grounds had he for this presumption?
47289	In the name of common sense, how can this be true?
47289	In this view can you be prepared for war at the expiration of the embargo?
47289	In this way, I grant, our conduct may be impartial; but what has become of our American rights to navigate the ocean?
47289	In what are these ten millions of dollars to be collected?
47289	In what condition do they leave the country, which, eight years since,"in the full tide of successful experiment,"fell into their hands?
47289	In what do they differ, to their advantage from other felons?
47289	In what does it consist?
47289	In what does your export to that region consist?
47289	In what mode, or by what_ means_ are they to be effected?
47289	In what respect, then, are they to be compared to Aaron Burr?
47289	In what school had these illustrious men formed those noble principles of civil liberty asserted by their eloquence and maintained by their arms?
47289	In what situation would she have stood in relation to the United States?
47289	In what situation would you then place some of the best men of the nation?
47289	In what way are we bound again to launch our country into this dark sea of restriction; surrounded on all sides with perils and penalties?
47289	In what way will the public coffers be filled?
47289	In what will this Government consist?
47289	Indeed, sir, and in what respect is it entitled to this definition of self- evident?
47289	Independently of the obvious propriety of this proceeding in itself, have we, sir, no examples of the course of conduct recommended by the resolution?
47289	Is Canada so far conquered that you can now reduce the term of enlistment?
47289	Is Great Britain less powerful now, than she was twenty years ago?
47289	Is Napoleon our king?
47289	Is a question of construction never to be at rest?
47289	Is all this trade of no importance to trading people?
47289	Is another brood of"restrictive"harpies, more unseemly and more hungry than their predecessors, to be let loose among them?
47289	Is any advantage to be derived from complaining of this?
47289	Is any disposition evidenced to omit tearing them from their homes and families in future?
47289	Is any gentleman prepared to say a smaller penalty will effect the object?
47289	Is commerce to be protected by abridging the natural rights of the people?
47289	Is he a man of truth?
47289	Is it a fact, that greater injuries exist from France than from Great Britain?
47289	Is it a land force?
47289	Is it a restoration of French property seized under the law of non- intercourse?
47289	Is it a want of capacity?
47289	Is it admitted that the British fleet secures her from attack?
47289	Is it an enjoyment of our rights, or a direct, full submission?
47289	Is it because the British officers impress from our vessels others besides natives?
47289	Is it because you have power on your side, sir, that you will not submit to a judicial decision of this question?
47289	Is it by merely reviving the law of May last, as is the object of this amendment?
47289	Is it calculated to produce this effect?
47289	Is it come to this, that a law constitutionally enacted, even after a formal decision in favor of its constitutionality, can not be enforced?
47289	Is it denied that the Government can take property from an individual, making him compensation therefor?
47289	Is it equal and exact justice to those two nations?
47289	Is it extinct?
47289	Is it for the benefit of the great mass of the American people?
47289	Is it for the honor of the nation to remove the embargo, without taking any other measure, and to bear with every indignity?
47289	Is it for the honor or happiness of this nation that we should again pass under the yoke of Great Britain?
47289	Is it from his past treatment of us?
47289	Is it from the correspondence in the genius of the two governments?
47289	Is it indeed guilty to defend our country?
47289	Is it lost to this nation?
47289	Is it necessary as a measure of self- defence, as the only mode of resistance which will bring England to terms?
47289	Is it necessary for me at this time of day to make a declaration of the principles of the Republican party?
47289	Is it necessary for me to allude to the reduction of the Army-- to say by whom it was made?
47289	Is it necessary for me to descant upon the topics of difference which then separated the two great parties in the Government?
47289	Is it necessary to show that the right which was exclusive during the patent, is now the common right of all?
47289	Is it not a convenient agent for paying and receiving money?
47289	Is it not a spirit of war?
47289	Is it not admitted that we may lawfully exclude or admit the vessels of both belligerents?
47289	Is it not an abandonment of those rights to which we are entitled?
47289	Is it not an exclusive privilege secured to the stockholders of this bank?
47289	Is it not for the purpose of promoting"the general welfare"of the nation which we represent?
47289	Is it not important that the men who live on the seaboard should know that we have a force to repel attack?
47289	Is it not known that all the surplus product of the agriculture of this country finds its vent on the Continent of Europe?
47289	Is it not known that, of the whole of our tobacco, seven out of eight parts are consumed on the continent?
47289	Is it not obvious that England will not comply with her part of the condition, and that the Emperor never expected that she would?
47289	Is it not obvious, from the very terms of the letter, that it contains a condition that the repeal is a qualified one?
47289	Is it not presumable that the President would choose to have some communication with our Ministers abroad before the meeting of Congress?
47289	Is it not rewarding the perfidy of the one at the expense of the other, and at the expense of ourselves?
47289	Is it not surprising, then, that we are called upon to give him the approbation of this House?
47289	Is it not then our duty, as guardians of the public interest, to provide this powerful, this necessary means of defence?
47289	Is it not these acts which have shut us out from a market?
47289	Is it nothing to us to extinguish the torch that lights up savage warfare?
47289	Is it on similarity of language?
47289	Is it on the ocean that the impression is to be made?
47289	Is it possible such doctrine should be advocated on the floor of Congress?
47289	Is it possible that such a declaration could be deemed orthodox when proceeding from lips so unholy as those of an excommunicant from that church?
47289	Is it possible that this Government will sanction such arbitrary practices?
47289	Is it pretended to enter into any stipulations with Great Britain as to our conduct?
47289	Is it right to take from one part of the community ten millions of dollars and put it into the hands of another part?
47289	Is it so believed by the Administration?
47289	Is it that of a nation keen to discern, and strong to resist, violations of its sovereignty?
47289	Is it to be imagined that a power so vast would have been left by the wisdom of the constitution to doubtful inference?
47289	Is it to be supposed that the people of the United States will agree to this?
47289	Is it to our advantage to be excluded from the trade of the continent?
47289	Is it to secure the independence of the people, to suffer a foreign nation to impose upon them any terms which it thinks proper?
47289	Is it to tell us she never will redress our wrongs; or is it to divert us from a prosecution of our rights?
47289	Is it to the interest of the Administration that these abuses should continue, and that loans and taxes should be resorted to to cover them?
47289	Is it to walk about this earth, to breathe this air, and to partake the common blessings of God''s providence?
47289	Is it unjust to continue the war, till this demand is complied with?
47289	Is it want of pecuniary or want of physical capacity?
47289	Is it, that we have suffered the non- intercourse law to expire?
47289	Is it_ Le Roi s''avisera_?
47289	Is no respect due to the opinions of our predecessors?
47289	Is not a bank a proper place for the deposit and safe- keeping of money-- more so than the custom- house?
47289	Is not every office in law called a franchise or a particular privilege?
47289	Is not the authority of the marshals competent to the execution of the laws?
47289	Is not the course a just and necessary one?
47289	Is not the income of every man impaired?
47289	Is not the war- worn soldier calling on us every day with his demands?
47289	Is not this a consideration that ought to be taken into account?
47289	Is not this feature modelled after the feature in the Government of England?
47289	Is not this proof that the merchants did not consider the risk very great?
47289	Is not this sufficient to induce us to take away from Governors this prerogative?
47289	Is not, then, the exemption from these liabilities an important immunity?
47289	Is such an act calculated to induce the belief that the embargo operates as a bounty on British trade?
47289	Is that a consideration to have no weight upon such a question as this?
47289	Is that a fact?
47289	Is that a mere idle discussion?
47289	Is the Administration for negotiation?
47289	Is the American nation ready to bow the neck?
47289	Is the Executive to infer from the proviso that something exists in the law which the friends of the proviso declare does not exist?
47289	Is the Secretary of the President of the United States knocking at the door for admittance?
47289	Is the South of easier access than the North, and is the circle of hostility to be extended to that quarter?
47289	Is the embargo submission?
47289	Is the enemy at the gate?
47289	Is the gentleman who represents that district( Mr. SEYBERT) willing that they shall absolve themselves from their contract by enlisting in the Army?
47289	Is the gentleman willing to surrender the carrying trade to Great Britain?
47289	Is the last effort to preserve the peace of the nation, to be abandoned from these considerations?
47289	Is the minority thus to be dragooned into this measure?
47289	Is the new and before unheard- of system of blockade abandoned?
47289	Is the object of this bill to promote science or the useful arts?
47289	Is the power to create this paper medium, or national currency, an attribute of State or national sovereignty?
47289	Is the removal of the non- importation act, and the admission of British vessels, nothing?
47289	Is then a refraining from so doing, submission?
47289	Is there a land upon the globe so fair, so happy, and so free?
47289	Is there a man who hears us who has not experienced its utility?
47289	Is there any liberty left among the people of France, or of those countries that France has conquered?
47289	Is there any limitation to the law on the statute book?
47289	Is there any probability that there will be any?
47289	Is there any probability, the slightest indication, that it will answer?
47289	Is there any provision in the constitution directing it?
47289	Is there any provision now made?
47289	Is there any thing in the last communication from the President, calculated to produce such an effect?
47289	Is there any thing yet wanting to fill up the full measure of injustice you have sustained?
47289	Is there no danger that we shall become enervated by the spirit of avarice, unfortunately so predominant?
47289	Is there no difference between protecting an existing right, and taking away a right from one party for the purpose of vesting it in another party?
47289	Is there no difference in the price under these circumstances?
47289	Is there not in this some proof that the evil has been magnified?
47289	Is there not time, I beseech you, gentlemen, to proceed in the regular mode to the election of our officers?
47289	Is there, indeed, a physical impossibility of removing them?
47289	Is this a justification for such an atrocious and exorbitant grasp at power?
47289	Is this a novel doctrine, either as to time, or the nation who now attempts to enforce it?
47289	Is this an honest neutrality?
47289	Is this coincidence of members, this exclusively Federal petitioning, no mark of party?
47289	Is this embargo what it pretends to be-- preparation for war?
47289	Is this great continent and the free millions who inhabit it, again to become appendages of the British Crown?
47289	Is this measure no abridgment of their rights?
47289	Is this no argument for reduction?
47289	Is this republican?
47289	Is this the period of all others to be selected to incorporate unmeaning laws in the body of your statute book?
47289	Is your course along the highway of nations unobstructed?
47289	It appears to be limited to sixty days; at the expiration of that time will any one say we shall be prepared for war?
47289	It had been asked, why was the country unprepared for defence?
47289	It has been asked whether the embargo has not operated more on the United States than on the European Powers?
47289	It has been rejected by France, and rejected by England after an expense of hundreds of thousands of dollars-- and now are we to take it up?
47289	It is asked of us, why admit the vessels of France, whilst injuries which she has done us are unatoned for?
47289	It was possible, but was it probable that any event would occur to alter our situation for the better?
47289	It was then read a third time; and on the question, Shall the bill pass?
47289	It would rise, on a removal of the embargo, to ten or twelve dollars; and how long would that price last?
47289	Let me ask him, if Administration should not take this course, whether it would not be perfectly proper that Congress should be in session?
47289	Let me ask if an American vessel under it can go to any port of France?
47289	Let me ask if it be not better to admit them?
47289	Let me ask the gentleman who asked that question, what mighty good our Army has done by land?
47289	Let me ask who will buy them when put into the market?
47289	Let me ask you, sir, what else he did, or could intend?
47289	Let me ask, what will be your export while that war continues?
47289	Let me ask, which have we placed in the best situation, France or England?
47289	Let me, therefore, inquire, in what this horrible act of substitution, as Mr. Jackson would make it appear, consists?
47289	Man is frail, and why should not, at times of public agitation and concussion of parties, abuses arise?
47289	May I not trust their confutation to that general knowledge of the subject which every member of the House possesses?
47289	May we not cherish this sentiment, without presumption, when we reflect on the characters by which this war was distinguished?
47289	May we not, in time, have the whole of South America, some of the West India islands, and, possibly, Great Britain?
47289	Mr. Chairman, is it for an infant nation, or a popular Government, to be deterred by the want of preparation?
47289	Mr. D. asked if the nation was to be saved by long speeches?
47289	Mr. MACON asked under what clause of the constitution Captain Murray and others had been remunerated?
47289	Mr. STANFORD said:--Mr. Speaker, I would ask if my colleague''s motion of amendment can be in order?
47289	Mr. Speaker, are we to be thus amused?
47289	Mr. Speaker, can any argument be more conclusive?
47289	Mr. Speaker, what would be your conduct on such an occasion?
47289	Mr. Speaker: What is this liberty of which so much is said?
47289	Must I not, then, deplore the feebleness of voice, the want of force, of manner, and promptness of mind and thought, which limit me?
47289	Must the best interests of the nation be put to hazard to save him the mortification of acknowledging his error and retracing his steps?
47289	My colleague( Mr. CLAY) has asked for the congeniality between a bank and the collection of our revenue?
47289	Need I remind you, said Mr. R., of the millions of victims sacrificed to commercial cupidity on the plains of Hindostan, by means of this navy?
47289	Need I say any thing further on the subject?
47289	Need I undertake to prove that, from the moment Whitney''s patent expired, his exclusive right ceased to exist?
47289	No doubt, sir, when the embargo is taken off, a momentary spur will be given to exportation; but how long will it continue?
47289	No; it has the ability, that is admitted; but will it not have the disposition?
47289	No; it was intended by this bounty to make us a great commercial people; and shall we ungratefully reject the enjoyment of his unexampled beneficence?
47289	Now I would ask, whether it is probable, that the British subjects would be willing to lend us money to carry on war against their sovereign?
47289	Now suppose we should look over our former exports to this island in any one year, what should we find the amount to be?
47289	Now the questions which result are, has the act been done?
47289	Now what is proposed by denying a renewal of the United States''Bank charter?
47289	Now, I ask, if they dare not resort to a direct tax, excise laws, and stamp acts, where will they obtain money?
47289	Now, he asked, whether men who had any regard to national honor would consent to navigate the ocean on terms so disgraceful?
47289	Now, if it became a State, would not all right of negotiation on the subject be taken from the President?
47289	Now, is not here an essential right to be alienated?
47289	Now, is there any reason to suppose that the contingent expenses of our navy would be greater in proportion to its force than this?
47289	Now, sir, I ask when we have made this country a State if we can do this?
47289	Now, sir, after thus stripping this extraordinary sentence of all its disguises, and translating it into plain English, to what does it amount?
47289	Now, sir, as to the non- intercourse system-- how does that operate?
47289	Now, sir, did this decree exist at the time of its date?
47289	Now, that the State which the gentleman represents is almost in arms against us?
47289	Now, what is the fact?
47289	Now, what reliance could be placed on this patriotism?
47289	Now, when a vile spirit of party has gone abroad and distracted the Union?
47289	Of what avail is the proclamation of the Prince Regent in this country, ordering the British subjects home?
47289	Of what consequence is it to us what way the Gottenburg merchant disposes of our products, after he has paid us our price?
47289	Of what materials will this army be composed?
47289	Of what nature are the rights in contest?
47289	On commercial intercourse?
47289	On the question, Shall the bill be read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall the bill pass to the third reading as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass?
47289	On the question, Shall this resolution pass?
47289	On the question,"Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time, as amended?"
47289	On the question: Shall this bill pass to a third reading, as amended?
47289	On the subject of impressments, for which alone the war is now to be continued, what, let me ask, is the principle for which our Government contends?
47289	On the subject of maritime law, has he not stated things which before were unheard of?
47289	On what does the ability of a nation depend?
47289	On what ground can this discrimination be defended?
47289	On what ground does this rest?
47289	On what principle is it that British ships were first excluded and on which their exclusion was confirmed by the non- intercourse law?
47289	On what, sir, is the honor of this nation now suspended?
47289	Or against England, who, with the monopoly of commerce which you leave her to enjoy, has no object further to annoy you?
47289	Or by what right do we create a military school?
47289	Or does the obligation of friendship exist on the part of the United States alone?
47289	Or in what section of the Union does the gentleman presume to say the American people will not submit to the law?
47289	Or is he the President of the United States?
47289	Or is he to get that information from inofficial sources?
47289	Or is it there our seamen are held in captivity?
47289	Or was it ever contended that had not the embargo been raised, the terms of Jay''s treaty would have been worse?
47289	Or was the Administration conducted in such a manner as to make the firmness and patriotism of the nation itself doubted abroad?
47289	Or, are we to tantalize their hopes with energy in one law and imbecility in another?
47289	Or, if it be one of those unmeaning propositions, the discussion of which could answer no good to this House?
47289	Ought it not, then, to follow, that the rights of those employed on land or water should also be inseparable?
47289	Ought the impending calamities to be left to the hazard of a contingent remedy?
47289	Ought we not to relieve its anxieties?
47289	Ought we, sir, to depend upon these men to man our fleets, or to defend our ports and harbors?
47289	Our privateers; will they have no effect on Great Britain?
47289	Pay tribute-- for what?
47289	Permit me here to endeavor to illustrate my idea by a reference to the constitution itself?
47289	Permit me to ask, how has it been ascertained that a bank is necessary to the operations of the Government?
47289	Permit me to inquire of that gentleman whether he ever saw a law authorizing one man to give another his promissory note?
47289	Permit me to inquire, in the first place, how the object of the constitution may be attained?
47289	Porter,"Free trade and sailor''s rights,"617; is there a man doubts the war was justly undertaken?
47289	Public property; and what species?
47289	Put down this bank, and how then are your revenues to be collected?
47289	Question 2--At what place was the conversation held?
47289	Question 3--Have you seen the members alluded to, or any of them, since you first appeared before this committee on Saturday last?
47289	Question by the committee-- From the conversation of what members did you collect the information of which you have spoken?
47289	Question, shall the Senate adhere to their amendments?
47289	Question-- Do you know where Henry is now?
47289	Respectable merchants, I observe, form a part of the bank deputies-- for what?
47289	Retain the qualified veto, and take away the power to prorogue and dissolve, and what will be the consequence?
47289	Reverse this picture, admitting that you have a war with Great Britain, what will be its consequences?
47289	SIR: Before I reply to your question,"how many major generals and brigadiers are necessary for an army of thirty- five thousand men?"
47289	Say thirty- five, and you add twenty, making together fifty- five: what use is there in multiplying regiments without men?
47289	Say, if you please, that you had those ships built, could you send them to sea?
47289	Seamen, who shall be attached by every tie to this country, and on whom we can depend for its defence in time of danger?
47289	Shall I be obliged by a laborious process of reasoning to prove the obligation of Government to rescue him from such suffering?
47289	Shall I be pardoned, sir, when I fear our vessels will only tend to swell the present catalogue of the British navy?
47289	Shall I be told the President had discovered that the blockade had been"avowed to be comprehended in, and identified with, the orders in council?"
47289	Shall I not attempt to arrest your progress in the path where lies a serpent that will sting you to death?
47289	Shall it again be held, in its orbit by the attractive, the corruptive influence of the petty island of Great Britain?
47289	Shall it lie unproductive in the public vaults?
47289	Shall negotiation be spun out further?
47289	Shall the majority govern, or shall a few wicked and abandoned men drive this nation from the ground it has taken?
47289	Shall the nation give way to an opposition of a few, and those the most profligate part of the community?
47289	Shall the revenue be reduced?
47289	Shall this bill pass to a third reading as amended?
47289	Shall we after this be told that Congress can not constitutionally exercise any right by implication?
47289	Shall we always shrink from the contest?
47289	Shall we always yield?
47289	Shall we exclude both, admit both, or discriminate?
47289	Shall we have companies without captains, or shall the United States pay for two captains?
47289	Shall we sit here with our arms folded until the enemy is at our gates?
47289	Shall we then abandon commerce, or shall we strive to support it?
47289	Shall we then believe the one and not the other?
47289	Shall we thereby secure our commercial rights?
47289	Shall we turn a deaf ear to the claims of individuals upon Government because of this statute?
47289	Shall we vindicate our independence at the expense of our social or moral obligations?
47289	Shall we, by their conquest, obtain the objects for which this war is waged?
47289	Shall we, sir, continue the war for these men?
47289	Shall we, then, by passing this resolution, sanction an idea that Lieutenant- Colonel Washington was entitled to more respect than others?
47289	Shall we, then, utter this libel on the nation?
47289	Should France have been selected?
47289	Sir, are we to continue in this state any longer?
47289	Sir, can men thus situated, solvent as they ought to be ten times over, find relief from the State banks?
47289	Sir, have I moved you a nauseous, sickening resolution, stuffed with adulation?
47289	Sir, have we no rights to defend?
47289	Sir, have we not been for years contending against the tyranny of the ocean?
47289	Sir, how is this to be done?
47289	Sir, if simplicity was not originally contemplated by the framers of the constitution, why the imposition on the people in publishing it to the world?
47289	Sir, if this be the fact, of whom does this wealthy population consist?
47289	Sir, is it possible that Congress can so far forget their duties to the people and their respect for themselves?
47289	Sir, shall I not be permitted to point to the yawning gulf beneath?
47289	Sir, what can gentlemen flatter themselves by suffering this discussion to be protracted to so unwarrantable a length?
47289	Sir, what has been the cause of our present condition?
47289	Sir, what in such a case would be true honor?
47289	Sir, what is the nature and import of this proclamation?
47289	Sir, what is this power we propose now to usurp?
47289	Sir, what sort of title is this?
47289	Sir, what would be the effect of passing by unnoticed these gross and insidious insults to both the people and Government?
47289	Sir, where is your commerce now to protect?
47289	Sir, will not the same reasoning apply against the maritime towns being taxed to support the army of 10,000 men in the West?
47289	Sir, will your money, when collected, be safe in the State banks?
47289	Sir, without indulging in vague conjectures, what are the best data we have to form an estimate of the amount of specie in the country?
47289	Sir, would Great Britain rely for her oracles on the newspapers or pamphlets of this country?
47289	Sixty thousand?
47289	So far from it, would not the danger of French influence be resounded throughout the nation?
47289	Some gentlemen indulge great expectations from privateers; but has Great Britain any unarmed or unprotected trade which they can attack?
47289	Strip the proposition, and what language does it speak?
47289	Suppose an attack upon any portion of the American army within the acknowledged limits of the United States by a Spanish force?
47289	Suppose an attempt to subvert this Government, would not the traitor first aim, by force or corruption, to acquire the treasure of this company?
47289	Suppose it ours, are we any nearer to our point?
47289	Suppose that the whole fine in any particular case had been paid by individual subscription, what has the Government to do with that?
47289	Suppose these men had been arrested and tried in this country, what would have been their lot?
47289	Suppose they should neglect or refuse to make these appointments, can you compel them to do it?
47289	Suppose this expectation disappointed-- suppose the harbor of New York blockaded by two seventy- fours?
47289	Suppose you make this transmission once, can you do it a second time?
47289	Surely; and yet we pay annually a tribute for permission to do it-- and why?
47289	Surrender your independence-- for what?
47289	Take a landsman on board a ship, and what sort of a sailor will he make?
47289	Take off the embargo, they cry-- for what?
47289	Take, then, the population of Canada to be 300,000 souls; what number of militia should this population furnish?
47289	Tell me, said he, what is to keep a great proportion of them from your coast in 1813?
47289	That is out of the question; then, the only question is, whether in the present state of the world, the embargo or war is the best for us?
47289	That of our cotton, at least one- half finds its market there?
47289	That she can admit that we have her always perfectly in our power?
47289	That the gentlemen on the other side of the House were divided on that subject, as they were upon the question of the reduction of the Navy?
47289	That they should expend large sums of money for the purpose of buying them out?
47289	That we should repel insults and respect ourselves?
47289	That, because we can not submit to the edicts of the belligerents, we will therefore open a free trade with them?
47289	That, under the pretext of a purchase from an Indian, named Double Head, people have gone over to settle lands, is true; but from where?
47289	The Orders in Council-- and what were they worth to him?
47289	The SPEAKER inquired whether Mr. G. yielded the floor?
47289	The SPEAKER then decided that the main question to now put, was:"Will the House concur with the Senate in the amendments made to the bill?"
47289	The amendments made by the House having been agreed to, the question was stated, Shall the bill be engrossed, and read a third time?
47289	The avowed principle is retaliation, but is it the true principle?
47289	The basis of all commerce is calculation; what calculation can be found for distant enterprises when the data are perpetually shifting?
47289	The commerce of that city, which exists only by commerce, destroyed?
47289	The committee rose and reported the bill without amendment, and the question was, Shall it be engrossed for a third reading?
47289	The gentleman from Kentucky( Mr. CLAY) asked, if banks are necessary for collecting the public revenues, why give them any other power?
47289	The gentleman from Pennsylvania asked yesterday, why not repeal the embargo laws, and provide for the enforcement of this system by a new law?
47289	The gentleman had appealed to the House to know why they would retain them?
47289	The gentleman says, suppose they were to return to their country, would they not be punished?
47289	The great subject for the contemplation of every reflecting mind in America was, what that remedy should be?
47289	The inquiry has been made, with some solicitude, what will you do with_ naturalized foreigners_?
47289	The majority now stand on high ground-- what will be said, and what will be the consequence of a refusal?
47289	The merchants?
47289	The negotiation opens, and what is done?
47289	The only question is, do they cease to violate our neutral commerce?
47289	The only question that presents itself is, Is the information useful to us?
47289	The press is groaning with pamphlets-- for what?
47289	The proceeding was unanimous; and what benefit did the British nation receive from this unanimous and prompt proceeding?
47289	The proper extent of the discussion growing out of this bill seemed to be confined to these inquiries: Can the force contemplated be obtained?
47289	The protection of the General Government claimed?
47289	The question is, Has he told the truth?
47289	The question is, how many marines are necessary, and in what battles are they employed?
47289	The question is, what regulation shall we make respecting public ships, and one of three courses is to be pursued?
47289	The question is, what should be done?
47289	The question ought always to be, What becomes the nation?
47289	The question then arises, what, under these circumstances, ought the officers and crew to be allowed?
47289	The question then presents itself, has Congress the power to divest the people of that right?
47289	The question was stated thus:"Is the decision of the SPEAKER correct?"
47289	The question was then taken--"Shall the amendments be engrossed, and, together with the bill, be read a third time?"
47289	The question was then, on what day shall it be read?
47289	The question which at once presents itself to every mind disposed to inquire, is, what is the object of this vast military force?
47289	The question"Shall the bill be engrossed for a third reading?"
47289	The right of not being vexed or endangered by paper blockades?
47289	The said bill was, accordingly, read the third time: Whereupon, Mr. SPEAKER stated the question from the chair, that the same do pass?
47289	The second object, which should never for a moment escape attention, Can the law be executed?
47289	The ship owners, the East and West India merchants, and what cause have they for war?
47289	The spoliation of your property?
47289	The true question is not, Is the matter expressed in this abstract proposition true?
47289	The violation of the personal liberty of your citizens and the degradation of the ensign of your sovereignty?
47289	The whole estate or my moiety only?
47289	Then the question results, has Congress a right, in order to determine its title, to refer it to any tribunal whatever?
47289	Then, to my mind, the only question is, shall we defend ourselves, or shall we submit?
47289	There ought to be no question as to what stock they sprung from; the true question was, ought they to be a State?
47289	They ask where are the men-- where is the money to be obtained?
47289	They asked--"What do we want of Canada?
47289	They complained of the first embargo; what did they get?
47289	They have been delivered to you by my honorable colleague-- what are they?
47289	They were gaining strength daily, and what was the situation of our Southern borders?
47289	They were repealed, finally, in consequence-- of what?
47289	Thirty thousand?
47289	This being the case, who would now be most likely to be supplied with it?
47289	This decree did not exist; and why was it not issued?
47289	This decree purports to be an act of reprisal on this country, and for what cause?
47289	This heaped up measure of legislative contumely is prepared; for whom?
47289	Through the medium of the State banks?
47289	To break up your infant manufactories, and to deprive poor children at once of a useful employment, and a home?
47289	To defeat the passage of this bill?
47289	To promote the public good or advance the national prosperity?
47289	To protect the constituents of my worthy colleague, in the enjoyment of their peace of mind?
47289	To provide no protection against smaller powers?
47289	To such favored beings what would be the suggestions of love, truly parental?
47289	To the Baltic, sir?
47289	To what is it owing that we are at this moment deliberating under the forms of a free representative government?
47289	To what purpose do we keep up the Marines, another branch of the Establishment?
47289	To what was our superiority owing?
47289	To whom will you confide the charge of leading the flower of our youth to the Heights of Abraham?
47289	Under all these circumstances was it wise and prudent to discharge the Navy?
47289	Under such circumstances is it not to be expected that this measure of the Executive will result in war?
47289	Under such circumstances, what should hurry us into the war?
47289	Under these circumstances what ought I to do?
47289	Under these circumstances, Mr. R. asked the House if it were not necessary for a committee to be appointed to probe into this business?
47289	Under this grant, Congress can pass laws to carry into effect the powers vested in the judicial department?
47289	Under what clause money paid into the Treasury had been returned in various instances?
47289	Upon meeting with this gentleman he inquired of me what had been done?
47289	Upon what ground, then, sir, is it that we are called on to pass this additional non- importation act against Great Britain?
47289	Upon whom are they dependent for legal existence and for length of days?
47289	Virginia has the physical force, but has she a moral right to violate the Constitution of the United States?
47289	War has been declared by a law of the land; and what would be thought of similar attempts to defeat any other law, however inconsiderable its object?
47289	Was Holland ruined by her navy?
47289	Was any nation ever less prepared for war?
47289	Was ever any body of men so cruelly wounded in the house of their friend?
47289	Was he expected to answer this question?
47289	Was he to set at defiance the law of the land?
47289	Was it believed that the gentleman from Pennsylvania( Mr. SMILIE) was disposed to submit to the belligerents?
47289	Was it competent, he asked, to the Government to receive as testimony the statement of the commander or crew of an American corsair?
47289	Was it for the purpose of destroying the Government?
47289	Was it for this the martyrs of the Revolution died?
47289	Was it not for want of unanimity in support of the measure?
47289	Was it not in consequence of its having been wantonly, shamefully, and infamously violated?
47289	Was it not, he asked, infinitely absurd and a direct violation of the constitution, to apportion the representation before these numbers were known?
47289	Was it obtained_ bona fide_ for a fair and full consideration?
47289	Was it proposed now to declare war?
47289	Was it so considered by the Republicans, when resorted to for redress against the primary violations in 1793?
47289	Was it such a repeal as the gentleman contends ought to have taken place of the Berlin and Milan decrees, viz: under the sign manual of the Emperor?
47289	Was it taken from an impression which had gone abroad in the country?
47289	Was it that the members of that Army should sheath their swords in the bowels of the liberties of their country?
47289	Was it then for the first time, that a division of sentiment appeared on this floor?
47289	Was not the President, in good faith, bound to believe the fact, and, believing it, bound to act as he did?
47289	Was not the first vessel which ever doubled the Cape of Good Hope, under the flag of the United States, the old frigate Alliance?
47289	Was not the royal family decoyed by artifice from Madrid to Bayonne?
47289	Was the President of the United States presumed to have turned a deaf ear to the cries of our suffering countrymen in captivity in a foreign nation?
47289	Was the batture ceded to the United States?
47289	Was the embargo principle considered submission in the days of the stamp act?
47289	Was the fact so?
47289	Was the gentleman from Maryland( Mr. KEY) who represented the adjacent district, in the same belligerent temper?
47289	Was the letter of Mr. Erskine a repeal of the British orders?
47289	Was the right of the citizen to fall prostrate before such an_ ex parte_ opinion or statement as that might be?
47289	Was there not some difficulty, under the proclamation, in the admission of the Statira frigate, bearing that Minister into our waters?
47289	Was this a necessary of life without which they could not subsist?
47289	Was this an avowed object in the Convention when it formed this article?
47289	Was this blockade such a violation of the neutral rights of the United States as to come decidedly within the act of the last session?
47289	Was this body calculated for that branch of Government?
47289	Was this the ground on which the subject was placed?
47289	We are farther told that impressment of seamen was not considered a sufficient cause of war; and are asked why should it be continued on that account?
47289	We are not only, sir, to ruin many innocent and unoffending individuals, but to derange the national finances; and for what is all this to be done?
47289	We are now going to war for the protection of these rights; but in what way, and under what circumstances?
47289	We are, sir, in a state of war; and what is evidently the course which we should pursue whilst in that situation?
47289	We asked, What were the emoluments?
47289	We create a military school-- for what purpose?
47289	We have been asked, Mr. Speaker, why not lay upon your table a proposition to go to war?
47289	We have been asked,"What are some of the small States when compared with the Mississippi Territory?"
47289	We lay an embargo-- is there any clause in the constitution authorizing us to lay embargoes?
47289	We say we will not trade-- with whom?
47289	We take off the embargo, and trade on their terms; what will be the consequence?
47289	Well, sir, how does she dispose of it?
47289	Well, sir, how was this miracle brought about?
47289	Well, sir, if the bank promptly calls in its loan of four hundred thousand dollars, will the debtors be enabled to meet their payments?
47289	Well, sir, was there ever a crisis calling on a people for vigorous exertions more awful than that which impends over us now?
47289	Well, sir, what then?
47289	Well, what then, say my friends?
47289	Well, what then?
47289	Were I to affirm the House is now in session, would it be reasonable to ask for proof?
47289	Were ever a body of men so abandoned in the hour of need, as the American Cabinet, in this instance by Bonaparte?
47289	Were gentlemen willing to submit to this: to raise the embargo, and subject our trade to this depredation?
47289	Were not parties arrayed against each other in 1796 on the subject of the British Treaty, and in 1798-''9, on the question of a war with France?
47289	Were not the disputes in this House, in those times, as long and as bitter as they have ever been since?
47289	Were the islands starved during these years?
47289	Were these people to be starved out, when they could actually purchase cheaper now from other places than they had formerly done from us?
47289	Were they to have resisted, and how?
47289	Were we more regardful of the property than the personal liberty of the citizen?
47289	Were we not to resist Great Britain because of her 1,130 sail of armed vessels?
47289	Were we to redress those wrongs, those commercial injuries, on the land?
47289	Were you able in the summer to recruit your army of twenty- five thousand men, could it be employed in any service in the course of this year?
47289	What State would have adopted the constitution, if it had been foreseen that this power would be granted to any man, however distinguished by office?
47289	What accounts did he bring?
47289	What advantage are my constituents to derive from the expenditure of this money?
47289	What advantage have we derived from it?
47289	What are a few seaport towns-- enterprising, wealthy, and prosperous, as indeed they are-- what are they, compared to my continental system?"
47289	What are his doctrines?
47289	What are our preparations for war?
47289	What are some of the legal effects of this incorporation?
47289	What are statutes of limitation as applicable to individual cases?
47289	What are the reasons for vesting Congress with the right to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States?
47289	What are they?
47289	What are they?
47289	What are you about to do-- to breathe vigor and energy into the bill?
47289	What becomes of the immense revenues derived from those sources?
47289	What better mode could have been adopted, to prevent Indian hostility and intercept British supplies of the instruments of massacre?
47289	What but pillage, insult, and scorn?
47289	What can resuscitate wheat devoured by the fly?
47289	What cause of complaint has Denmark, or ever had Denmark, against us?
47289	What cause, Mr. Chairman, which existed for declaring the war has been removed?
47289	What change, sir, has occurred in the state of things to produce this strange impossibility?
47289	What claim has the Spanish Government upon our moderation and forbearance?
47289	What crime has been left undone?
47289	What did she first dictate for remedying any complaint?
47289	What did they do?
47289	What did you in this instance?
47289	What do its terms necessarily include?
47289	What do they imply?
47289	What do we understand by regulating commerce?
47289	What does it still require?
47289	What does public economy require, but that every one should serve the Republic in that capacity in which he can be most useful?
47289	What does the Attorney- General state in his report?
47289	What does this prove?
47289	What earthly good can result from it?
47289	What effect do gentlemen expect that the embargo will have had in May?
47289	What effect has it produced on France?
47289	What effect has this measure produced on foreign nations?
47289	What evidence have we had since to give us a more favorable prospect, as it respects the revocation of the decrees?
47289	What fate befalls the agriculture of the South?
47289	What glory?
47289	What has Mr. Canning given you in return?
47289	What has become of that high Federal spirit which disdained to buy Louisiana?
47289	What has become of that vast amount of money?
47289	What has become of the newspaper called the Washington Federalist?
47289	What has been her conduct since we acquired Louisiana?
47289	What has been her conduct?
47289	What has he said?
47289	What have been the propositions heretofore made by our Government to Great Britain upon this subject?
47289	What have we done since?
47289	What have we gained?
47289	What have we here, in the estimate of last year?
47289	What have we to destroy this proof?
47289	What if the other Hull had commanded?
47289	What influence could the opinion of the Attorney- General have?
47289	What injuries have been received from France?
47289	What insults, what injuries had we not suffered?
47289	What is a corporation such as the bill contemplates?
47289	What is a just and necessary war?
47289	What is done with it at this epoch?
47289	What is due to the national honor?
47289	What is it that the youth has not to prepare, or when was it that a popular Government taxed itself with previous preparation?
47289	What is it to lead to?
47289	What is it we do for a license to go into the Mediterranean?
47289	What is necessary to sustain an elevated fitness of character and conduct in the nation?
47289	What is now the situation of affairs?
47289	What is that plan, and what are the objects in contemplation?
47289	What is the consequence?
47289	What is the declaration made to the British Minister at this place, by our Secretary of State, on this subject?
47289	What is the doctrine of my friend from Georgia?
47289	What is the effect of this double obligation?
47289	What is the expression of the British Envoy on which gentlemen rely, and on which they are about to sit down quietly under the vine and fig tree?
47289	What is the fact, admitting all that this person has said to be true?
47289	What is the fact?
47289	What is the import of this provision?
47289	What is the language they speak?
47289	What is the nature of the title set up by the gentleman from Vermont?
47289	What is the nature of this Government?
47289	What is the object of this language?
47289	What is the object of this vast military force?
47289	What is the plain language of this preamble?
47289	What is the proposition which he submits?
47289	What is the result of it?
47289	What is the situation of our country generally?
47289	What is the spirit that breathes in the five resolutions which have been adopted-- resolutions which were in entire accordance with my feelings?
47289	What is the state of British commerce at this time?
47289	What is the state of the bank in this city?
47289	What is the state of things alluded to?
47289	What is the state of trade between us and France?
47289	What is the subject- matter in dispute?
47289	What is this argument of infancy?
47289	What is this tribute?
47289	What is to fill your Treasury now, if the people can not sell their products?
47289	What limitation does it contain upon the power to raise and support armies?
47289	What limitation does the constitution contain upon the power to lay and collect taxes, imposts, duties, and excises?
47289	What loans, I ask, have Government ever received from the Bank of the United States?
47289	What maritime strength is it expedient to provide for the United States?
47289	What may be the effect, if you introduce either of these two principles into this bill?
47289	What misfortune so great as the loss of character?
47289	What more can you do?
47289	What must be the effect of such insinuations?
47289	What must be the inevitable consequence if this measure is suffered to go into effect?
47289	What must you do?
47289	What nation or individual ever reached that state?
47289	What nation, in so short a time, ever before ascended to such a height of commercial greatness?
47289	What new order of things has disqualified them for the enjoyment of liberty?
47289	What object could he have in view which should induce him to conclude an arrangement, except with full confidence of its being carried into effect?
47289	What offence has she committed against France?
47289	What power have we to negotiate about the territory of any of the States?
47289	What prohibits us from doing to England what England does to us?
47289	What prospect is there that the embargo will be removed?
47289	What reason could there be for enacting this law, if the principles of the law of 1807 were correct?
47289	What reason had been given for such a course?
47289	What regular trade can yield such profits on the outward and inward cargoes?
47289	What reply did the majority of Congress give to this train of reasoning?
47289	What republicanism is this?
47289	What resistance do they afford against their decrees or confiscation?
47289	What restore flour soured in the barrel?
47289	What restriction is to be found in it upon the right to provide and maintain a navy?
47289	What right has Britain to tyrannize on the ocean, and prescribe limits to our trade?
47289	What right, in the whole charter of our rights, has not at some time been abused?
47289	What rights, Mr. Chairman?
47289	What satisfaction has been received for your plundered property?
47289	What says France?
47289	What says it?
47289	What says the sarcastic British Minister?
47289	What shall we say of the_ French_ doctrine in relation to this subject of impressment?
47289	What sort of attack have we cause to expect?
47289	What the ability of its debtors to meet their engagements?
47289	What then is the inference from this state of the case?
47289	What then is the object of the opposition?
47289	What then results?
47289	What then was her situation?
47289	What then will be the consequence of passing this bill?
47289	What then would be the case?
47289	What then?
47289	What think you, sir?
47289	What though their cities offer no plunder?
47289	What though their conquest can yield no glory?
47289	What upon the right to declare war and make peace?
47289	What use has been made of it?
47289	What was our situation now?
47289	What was that case?
47289	What was the amount of the gentleman''s showing on this occasion?
47289	What was the case in 1798?
47289	What was the condition to be performed on the part of France?
47289	What was the consequence?
47289	What was the consequence?
47289	What was the consequence?
47289	What was the effect of our eloquent addresses, when colonies, placed at the foot of the British throne?
47289	What was the effect of this information?
47289	What was the fact as respected France?
47289	What was the fact in this case?
47289	What was the history of it?
47289	What was the leading object of the adoption of the Federal Constitution in the northern parts of the Union?
47289	What was the occupation of a Virginian wife-- her highest ambition?
47289	What was the offer made to our Government by the British Ministry?
47289	What was the policy of the ordinance, and what the object of its framers?
47289	What was the power of Venice and Genoa when they led the van of naval power?
47289	What was the situation of some branches of our commerce then?
47289	What was the situation of the slaveholding States?
47289	What was the vote then?
47289	What was then our condition?
47289	What was then our situation with those nations?
47289	What was there to mar success?
47289	What was this ground?
47289	What were the House about to do?
47289	What were the facts?
47289	What were the objects of the war?
47289	What were then the doctrines of the French Government?
47289	What were those measures?
47289	What were those that characterized its progress and termination?
47289	What were your preparations for the Revolutionary war, and when made?
47289	What will avail the activity or gallantry of your officers and seamen against such disparity of force?
47289	What will be the consequence of laying down our arms, of shrinking from our present attitude?
47289	What will be the consequence of such neglect?
47289	What will be the influence of such an institution on the Government, and the country at large?
47289	What will be the situation of this unhappy, misguided country?
47289	What will in this case become of your source of wealth in the Western country?
47289	What will the Government of Spain, Junta, King, or Governors of Spanish provinces to whom you apply, say to you on this subject?
47289	What will the gentleman discover, by examining the history of the period he referred to?
47289	What would an honest Dutchman in the West think of a man who kept as many stables as horses, and those of the most expensive construction, too?
47289	What would be inferred from this procedure?
47289	What would be said in a court of justice in a case of murder?
47289	What would be the effect of such a system in the present war?
47289	What would be the effect of this war upon ourselves?
47289	What would be the effects of war, the tocsin of which was for the first time sounded through the land?
47289	What would be the object of a war?
47289	What would be the situation of your seaports and their seafaring inhabitants?
47289	What would be the upshot?
47289	What would have been the situation of our cause in the Revolution, if, after the British successes in Jersey, we had desponded?
47289	What would have been thought of such conduct in the war of the Revolution?
47289	What would it have been for sixty, one hundred, or three hundred and sixty- five days past?
47289	What would then be the state of the Territorial Legislatures?
47289	What, I would ask, is the probable fact, as to the facilities which this bank will afford the Government in borrowing?
47289	What, Mr. President, is the nature of this title?
47289	What, Mr. Speaker, are we now called on to decide?
47289	What, have we a Minister abroad, and is he afraid or unwilling to make a proposition to the Government where he is resident?
47289	What, he asked of the House, was settled by the passage of this bill?
47289	What, he asked, was the extent of the country in question?
47289	What, said Mr. C, is this statute of limitations, which, whenever mentioned in this House, seems to make everybody tremble?
47289	What, said Mr. D., is the situation in which we are now placed?
47289	What, said Mr. M., will be the effect of a proposition for taxing salt in the country?
47289	What, said Mr. R., has been the situation of Great Britain in relation to Spain?
47289	What, sir, are, or have been its effects on Great Britain?
47289	What, sir, did gentlemen on this floor say was the purport of this note?
47289	What, sir, has been the practice of the British House of Commons?
47289	What, sir, has been the practice under this law?
47289	What, sir, have the other party done?
47289	What, sir, said Mr. M., would have become of Rome, had she desponded when Hannibal defeated her armies?
47289	What, sir, shall constitute cause of war?
47289	What, sir, was the avowed object of this war?
47289	What, sir, was the conduct of the British Parliament and nation upon that occasion?
47289	What, sir, was the object of that law?
47289	What, sir, were the circumstances under which that mission was despatched here?
47289	What, sir?
47289	What, then, had experience taught them on this subject?
47289	What, then, is the true construction of the Treaties of St. Ildefonso and of April, 1803, from whence our title is derived?
47289	What, then, is this case?
47289	What, then, let me ask, has changed the character of those people, that they are to be despised?
47289	What, then, was our situation when Congress met?
47289	What, then, were the causes of the war?
47289	When Bonaparte talks of the freedom of the seas, does he mean the same idea which we attach to these words when we use them?
47289	When Mr. Jefferson, that illustrious character, presided over the destinies of the United States, why was not this navy- building proposed?
47289	When Spain was the ally of France she was-- what?
47289	When an adjustment is made with one of those powers, what is your language?
47289	When did our coercive measures commence?
47289	When did that voracious monster ever disgorge the plunder he had once received into his insatiable maw?
47289	When did they begin; when, though they may have been varied in character, were they relaxed in degree, and when were they probably to cease?
47289	When gentlemen attempt to carry this measure, upon the ground of acquiescence or precedent, do they forget that we are not in Westminster Hall?
47289	When has England been at peace with all the world, since she became a great naval power?
47289	When he talks of the principles of maritime law, does he mean the same as we?
47289	When the country was in want of clothing, and could get it for one- fourth price from the British, what was the consequence?
47289	When you had differences with both the belligerents, what was your language?
47289	When, by the express letter of the instrument,"new States may be admitted,"and when Vermont, not mentioned in the Confederation, has been admitted?
47289	Whence but from that origin came all the blessings of life, so far as political privileges are concerned?
47289	Whence can the money be obtained?
47289	Whence comes it, that in the archives of this Assembly, we find copies of licenses given by the Executive power of the nation-- to do what?
47289	Whence could be the objection to Congress meeting at an earlier day?
47289	Whence did we derive a power to purchase Louisiana, and incorporate it with the good old United States?
47289	Whence does this gentleman derive the power of declaring an act of Congress not in force, declared by the President''s proclamation to be in force?
47289	Whence the inducement to urge the annulment of a blockade of France, when, if annulled, no American cargoes would obtain a market in any of her ports?
47289	Whence the power to make it an instrument of commerce?
47289	Whence was derived a power to pass a law laying an embargo without limitation?
47289	Whence, sir, do you get the right, whence do you derive the powers to erect custom- houses in the maritime districts of the United States?
47289	Where are her colonies into which we could carry our arms?
47289	Where are her ships?--where her commerce?
47289	Where are the navies of Sweden and Denmark?
47289	Where are they gone?
47289	Where are those rights when great maritime powers become belligerent?
47289	Where are we to come in contact with our enemy?
47289	Where can the necessary supply of cotton be procured?
47289	Where could we have carried on against her any of the operations of war?
47289	Where could we subjugate her provinces?
47289	Where do you expect to find regulations of commerce?
47289	Where does the remainder usually go?
47289	Where have you seen a National Bank, connected with the Government, which has not ultimately ruined the circulating medium of the nation?
47289	Where is Holland now?
47289	Where is it when Canada is mentioned?
47289	Where is that spirit which enforced a simple resolution of the old Congress, not then binding upon the people, as a law from Heaven?
47289	Where is that spirit which for this reason separated us from the nations of Europe?
47289	Where is the Macedonian phalanx, the opposition in Congress?
47289	Where is the Montgomery, or even the Arnold, or the Burr, who is to march to Point Levi?
47289	Where is the difference, sir?
47289	Where is the impost duty which has supported the Government, and sunk to a considerable degree the national debt?
47289	Where is the justice-- where the equality-- of such a provision?
47289	Where is the justice?
47289	Where is the limitation upon this power to set up corporations?
47289	Where is the necessity of a proviso if the law does not bear such a construction?
47289	Where is the proof that the Executive did not call for those powers?
47289	Where is your revenue then to come from?
47289	Where now is the Revolutionary hero to whom you are about to confide this sacred trust?
47289	Where shall we stop, said Mr. D., if we tread back on the steps of each other?
47289	Where was the necessity, they will tell you, of declaring that the Orders in Council will_ have been_ withdrawn?
47289	Where were they found?
47289	Where will be the boasted militia of the gentleman?
47289	Where will proof be found of a fact so disgraceful?
47289	Where will those supplies be drawn from?
47289	Where would it end if the House were now to make a solemn resolution approving of the conduct of the President?
47289	Where, sir, could we attack France?
47289	Where, then, is the ground of such an influence?
47289	Where, then, is the money to be found, or what has been done with it?
47289	Where, then, is the necessity for this bank?
47289	Where, then, will you protect your commerce?
47289	Whether Congress have the power by the constitution to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States?
47289	Whether it does not appear probable that at least one thousand of those contained in this list were impressed without even a plausible pretext?
47289	Whether we believe in all the rights which the French Emperor condescends to claim for us from the British, although he will not admit them himself?
47289	Which is best-- to keep them at home, to a certain loss and probable ruin, or adventure them abroad to a possible loss and highly probable gain?
47289	While we facilitate negotiations with the British, why should we embarrass and prevent the same with the French?
47289	While we throw wide open the door of negotiation to England, why should we shut it against France?
47289	Whilst these peaceful experiments are undergoing a trial, what is the conduct of the opposition?
47289	Who but Christophe and Petion?
47289	Who can bear the idea of our being obliged to burn or sink all the ships we may take away from the enemy, for fear of their being recaptured?
47289	Who could say them nay?
47289	Who denies it?
47289	Who ever pretended to believe in its efficacy?
47289	Who has not heard of the once formidable fleets of Venice and Genoa?
47289	Who is here that hears these words, but what approves the sentiment they contain?
47289	Who is properly the presiding officer in this case?
47289	Who is there, now, in this body who has not voted for the erection of a light- house?
47289	Who is this man, and where is he?
47289	Who is this war party?
47289	Who must suffer by it?
47289	Who then has been the first aggressor?
47289	Who was in possession of the land when the law passed?
47289	Who was there now to supply all these various colonies that used to be supplied by us?
47289	Who was to decide which was the correct one?
47289	Who were the members of our first Congress?
47289	Who were they?
47289	Who will become the purchasers-- Great Britain?
47289	Who will impute to this body so disgraceful a motive?
47289	Who will profit by it?
47289	Who would dare to avow an intention to defeat its operation?
47289	Who would step forward to rescue them from that punishment due to their crime if convicted by our own courts?
47289	Who, sir, are the true friends-- I do not speak of motives-- who in fact are the true friends of Administration?
47289	Who, sir, can estimate the complicated mischiefs of a depreciated paper currency, without specie for its redemption?
47289	Who, sir, will be most likely to avail himself of this privilege, or rather of this course?
47289	Who?
47289	Whose products, then, would Great Britain carry?
47289	Why are we partisans of either?
47289	Why are your Ministers now loitering in foreign Courts?
47289	Why do it, then?
47289	Why give to Congress the right to coin money and regulate its value?
47289	Why has it so happened that this necessity has never existed until the last session of Congress?
47289	Why has the gentleman shielded British instigation of their outrages?
47289	Why has the measure failed of expected success?
47289	Why invest it with a capital immense in amount, and sovereign in its control over the external and internal commerce of the country?
47289	Why is a judge, sworn to support the laws and constitution of the country, bound by a train of decisions contrary to his own opinions?
47289	Why is he impelled to shed our blood?
47289	Why is it out of order?
47289	Why keep them up at this place, whence they could not get out of the river perhaps in three weeks or a month?
47289	Why kiss the rod of iron which inflicts the stripes without a cause?
47289	Why legislate by halves?
47289	Why love her rulers?
47289	Why make the distinction in this instance?
47289	Why need they decide this business immediately?
47289	Why not, it was asked, wait for the actual census of the territory?
47289	Why not, sir?
47289	Why not?
47289	Why should our sympathies be awakened in favor of Spain?
47289	Why should such a power have been delegated?
47289	Why should they come here then?
47289	Why should we hurry into a war from which nothing but calamity can be expected?
47289	Why so many vexatious restrictions upon neutral trade, tending to destroy competition on our part in the continental markets?
47289	Why then is it, that we are called upon to make a new declaration of independence?
47289	Why then should they not be manned and put in readiness for service?
47289	Why then, in this awful crisis, shall we not look to the same quarter?
47289	Why then, sir, should we not have union, when it is so easy and efficacious a remedy for all our difficulties?
47289	Why this great cry about domestic manufactures?
47289	Why was he not hanged as a traitor?
47289	Why was not that mercy which is so pathetically called for bestowed on them by that tribunal before whom the case was examined?
47289	Why was the evidence of the repeal of the decrees withheld?
47289	Why were they not liberated?
47289	Why, and for what was the constitution made?
47289	Why, sir, do you think the merchants will believe that you really intend to go to war?
47289	Why, sir, does the gentleman disapprove of the President''s proclamation?
47289	Why, sir, is it strange?
47289	Why, sir, was justice so long delayed, and why was it at last obtained?
47289	Why, then, should it be condemned?
47289	Why, then, should it be now determined at all events to abandon this measure?
47289	Why, then, sir, shall he now affect not to understand us?
47289	Why, then, will gentlemen persist in that course where danger is almost unavoidable, and shun that where safety is almost certain?
47289	Will a navy have this effect?
47289	Will any gentleman regret that this twenty- six gun ship has been built, though the mastery of the Lakes has been acquired without it?
47289	Will gentlemen be good enough to condescend so far as to assign some object that the Executive could have had in view from such conduct?
47289	Will gentlemen suffer me to turn their attention to this last fact?
47289	Will gentlemen tell us from whence they are to procure the principal articles of provisions and lumber?
47289	Will he explain it?
47289	Will he pretend to say, that this is an offensive war; a war of conquest?
47289	Will it be less difficult or unpopular to do this after the debt has accumulated to an enormous amount?
47289	Will it be said, that when the arrangement was made with Mr. Erskine the President had no knowledge of the blockading orders of May, 1806?
47289	Will it come from the Eastward, in bills of the State banks?
47289	Will it compel the great belligerent Powers to do us justice for past injuries and secure us for the future?
47289	Will it contradict itself by taking away the seamen?
47289	Will it not be prudent to diminish the extent of this evil by putting down this bank which is the fountain from which the whole system flows?
47289	Will it then be asked, shall we not go to war and fight our way?
47289	Will not the alarm be increased by its continuance at this time?
47289	Will not the officer be also liable to the State laws?
47289	Will not the same causes produce the same effects now as then?
47289	Will she learn nothing from the loss of three or four hundred ships?
47289	Will she make no diversions in their favor?
47289	Will she suffer us to carry the war into her territories, and not retort upon us?
47289	Will she then respect our rights?
47289	Will the country be less able to repress insurrection?
47289	Will the gentleman say she values the principles of the Orders in Council, as she did the sovereignty of her colonies?
47289	Will the gentleman trust the merchants with the guardianship of his own honor?
47289	Will the honorable gentleman tell us why?
47289	Will they deign to listen to the voice of history, and learn how chimerical are their apprehensions?
47289	Will they not forever hereafter compel us to trade as they please?
47289	Will they prove us by the_ waters_, and reject all such as will not lap as the dog lappeth?
47289	Will this old argument, in favor of a navy, now be used, which we have so often heard heretofore?
47289	Will you call upon her to leave your ports and harbors untouched, only just till you can return from Canada to defend them?
47289	Will you find him in the person of an acquitted felon?
47289	Will you have a list of them?
47289	Will you have any?
47289	Will you keep house forever, rather than make choice of the path through which you will resume your external rights?
47289	Will you not only go to war, but wage a_ bellum ad internecinum_ for it?
47289	Will you open your campaign at mid- summer?
47289	Will you protect that clandestinely destined to Great Britain?
47289	Will you protect that destined to the coast of France?
47289	Will you refuse to do yours?"
47289	Will you say that your provocations were less then than now?
47289	Will you say to England,"end the war when you please, give us the direct trade in our own produce, we are content?"
47289	Will you seek for the deep foundations of her power in the frozen deserts of Labrador?
47289	Will you tax the great agricultural community for the purpose of protecting this extraneous commerce?
47289	Will you, sir, have the goodness to direct an inquiry, and order the release of such as are citizens of the United States?
47289	Will, then, any injury, or any combination of injuries, authorize or require national resentment?
47289	With them alone?
47289	With these facts staring him in the face, how could he do otherwise than urge an early session?
47289	With this discriminating, permanent, municipal law, could we expect Great Britain to treat with us as a neutral?
47289	With what sentiment, think you, would such doctrines have been received?
47289	Without her maritime strength, would she have aspired to balance the scales of power on the Continent?
47289	Would a tax on salt, he asked, be equal?
47289	Would any gentleman who regarded his honor tell the House that there were 30,000 inhabitants in the undisputed Territory?
47289	Would he not be right to suspect those who vote for, and more especially those who bring forward such a proposition, of improper motives?
47289	Would he not have used it as one of the strongest inducements to the adoption of this system?
47289	Would he respect us more than England would?
47289	Would it be good policy, he asked, to let our means of carrying on war on the ocean rot in our docks, and not make use of them?
47289	Would it be possible that foreign powers could look up with any reverence to their acts?
47289	Would it establish our neutral rights?
47289	Would it have been proper for the Government to have entered into no stipulations for the security of American seamen?
47289	Would it have had that power, if this right had not been expressly delegated?
47289	Would it not prove beyond doubt that the Administration was sincere in its wishes for peace?
47289	Would it, in your opinion, be advisable to increase the duty on foreign tonnage?
47289	Would not the passage of this resolution be considered as an indirect censure on the other Revolutionary characters who have gone from us?
47289	Would not these carriers supply their own manufacturers?
47289	Would she carry products of other nations, and let her own manufacturers starve?
47289	Would she have become a party to the infamous conspiracy of Pilnitz?
47289	Would she have broken the peace of Amiens whence her present dangers arise?
47289	Would she have wantonly plotted the dismemberment of France?
47289	Would the English nation have endured it?
47289	Would the chivalry of gentlemen on the other side of the House have suggested an invasion of France?
47289	Would the conquest of those colonies shake the policy of the British cabinet?
47289	Would the remedy for this interference with our rights be abandoning the ocean altogether?
47289	Would they have been permitted in favor of the United States, could those wants be supplied from any other quarter?
47289	Would they suffer cotton to go elsewhere, until they themselves were supplied?
47289	Would this satisfy the Emperor?
47289	Would you be apt to look as much at the nature of the propositions, as at the temper of the assailant?
47289	Would you consent to see a scuffle at the gallows between the civil authority and the military for the body of that wretch?
47289	Would you have excluded British vessels since 1793, for taking the vessels engaged in your lawful trade, and for impressing your seamen?
47289	Would you not tell such an assailant, that you were not to be bullied nor beaten into any concession?
47289	Would you ratify such an arrangement if you could help it?
47289	Would you ship your commerce there merely to surrender so much property into the grasp of the Emperor?
47289	Yes, Mr. President, I reiterate, are they not murderers?
47289	Yes, sir, ask yourself this question in regard to any man, to whom you are about to confide important trusts: Does he pay his just debts?
47289	Yet, I ask the question: is not the spirit which it breathes disgraceful?
47289	You have always got the better of the argument; you have better proclamations; but what avails all this?
47289	You have been heretofore told your paper measures were worth nothing: now that it is proposed to give blow for blow, what is said?
47289	You have taken Quebec-- have you conquered England?
47289	You will wage war, and not to rescue your fellow- citizens from imprisonment and stripes?
47289	Your trade was, a few years ago, unrestrained and flourishing-- did it not enrich the most distant parts of your country?
47289	[ 34] For these injuries and insults what atonement has been made?
47289	_ Blank ballots, shall they be counted?_--In the House on election for Speaker two blank ballots were cast, shall they be counted?
47289	_ In the House_, bill taken up, 547; is it such as to require secrecy?
47289	_ Now_, where are we?
47289	above the legal rate of interest?
47289	and has she not always refused to make any arrangement about them?
47289	and that, too, from a nation at all times disposed to depress this growing country?
47289	and what would be the probable addition to the revenue applicable to the year 1814 by such increase?
47289	are they now more disposed to succumb and accept your terms than before the war?
47289	debate become angry and be prolonged?
47289	did they fall?
47289	for relieving him from a dreadful captivity?
47289	has the gentleman received any such, even informally, from any officer of this Government?
47289	how is it so influenced?
47289	how?
47289	if so, whence did it arise?
47289	is this that_ bona fide_ performance of the condition?
47289	or does any American wish to see his country prostrated still lower?
47289	or from the unofficial conversation of the members of the House?
47289	or how can Mr. Jackson reconcile it to himself to say that in adhering to these gross insinuations, he did not intend to give offence?
47289	or is her hostility merely commercial?
47289	or should even endeavor to teach others to venerate, to cherish, to support it?
47289	shall our militia be commanded by officers commissioned by the President?
47289	the orders of June and November, 1793, which produced Jay''s treaty?
47289	to engage every man who is willing to serve his country?
47289	to place a recruiting officer in almost every town and village in the United States?
47289	were parties never before heard of in this country?
47289	what injury have we not suffered?
47289	what''s that?
47289	what''s that?"
47289	where would have been that proud spirit of resistance to Ministerial encroachment on our rights and liberties, which achieved our independence?
47289	whether, by our laws, and the practice under them, we have afforded them all that protection and security to which they are entitled?
47289	who are they?"