trigram

This is a table of type trigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

trigram	frequency
of the inquisition	1412
archivo de simancas	1377
the holy office	695
one of the	518
of the holy	507
that he had	437
that it was	415
was to be	402
the council of	388
that he was	350
there was no	345
we have seen	343
were to be	342
on the th	339
it was not	336
the tribunal of	334
to the inquisition	323
of the tribunal	320
there was a	309
to have been	306
to the king	304
the inquisition was	298
the case of	294
as to the	291
inquisicion de valencia	286
of the suprema	283
by the inquisition	280
to the suprema	275
he had been	262
seems to have	260
of the church	259
and it was	248
of the inquisitors	246
the th of	245
in which the	244
in the case	239
who had been	227
it would be	226
not to be	223
in order to	220
the inquisition of	217
the holy see	216
he did not	215
the name of	213
of the royal	212
as well as	210
the inquisition and	210
which he had	209
it was a	208
the same time	207
in which he	202
at the same	201
as we have	198
of the king	197
to the tribunal	195
royal library of	195
in the same	192
and that the	192
in spite of	192
part of the	189
auto de fe	187
that they were	186
it was the	185
it is not	184
of the council	179
could not be	172
which he was	172
and he was	169
ferdinand and isabella	169
the death of	167
but it was	167
that he would	167
there is no	165
the inquisitors of	164
the hands of	164
which had been	163
the instructions of	161
that of the	161
he could not	159
the number of	158
the bishop of	156
to the pope	155
of the kingdom	155
he was not	153
the power of	152
of those who	151
of the tribunals	151
would have been	151
to be a	149
and of the	149
it is true	147
and that he	147
under pain of	147
according to the	147
a matter of	146
library of copenhagen	145
sent to the	145
to the inquisitors	145
that the inquisition	145
that there was	144
out of the	143
he was to	143
the inquisition in	142
of library of	140
had not been	140
of royal library	139
of all the	139
in view of	139
is to be	139
la orden de	138
de la orden	137
inquisicion de toledo	137
of the most	136
orden de santiago	136
of the spanish	135
some of the	135
bulario de la	135
of the same	133
of the accused	133
the new christians	132
jurisdiction of the	131
the spanish inquisition	131
a letter of	131
library of univ	130
he was a	129
we shall see	128
members of the	127
those who had	127
the duke of	126
the inquisition had	125
the presence of	125
should not be	123
the king and	121
of the inquisitor	121
of which the	120
was obliged to	120
to the holy	119
by the suprema	119
council of castile	118
the fact that	118
to the inquisitor	116
the secret prison	116
that it had	115
the supreme council	114
they were not	114
that the inquisitors	114
the end of	114
the inquisitors to	114
the court of	113
we are told	113
the inquisition to	113
it had been	113
it to the	112
tells us that	112
is true that	112
and in the	112
the same year	111
the use of	111
that they should	111
of which he	111
must have been	110
that they had	110
to all the	109
those of the	109
to be the	109
it may be	109
when he was	108
member of the	107
as soon as	107
in a letter	106
de la c	105
that he should	104
was one of	104
view of the	104
which they were	103
to do so	102
on the other	102
and the suprema	102
him to the	102
the time of	102
at the time	102
consulta de fe	102
the jurisdiction of	101
by the tribunal	100
in the hands	100
a number of	99
of the jews	99
to the secular	99
had to be	98
on account of	98
on the subject	98
the archbishop of	98
the names of	97
was not to	96
account of the	96
the church of	96
the cause of	96
them to the	96
that he might	96
the next day	95
of the trial	95
the house of	95
he had not	94
the edict of	94
they were to	94
by the inquisitors	94
this was the	93
seem to have	93
by no means	93
was in the	93
in favor of	93
the trial of	92
as it was	92
are to be	92
those who were	92
and there was	91
that he could	91
to the royal	91
the toledo tribunal	90
the inquisitors and	90
history of the	90
the suprema ordered	90
de la inquisicion	89
a brief of	89
so that the	89
in the presence	89
of the witnesses	88
of his own	88
this was not	88
the valencia tribunal	88
to which the	88
contrary to the	88
it was impossible	87
de los rios	87
the suppression of	87
of the people	87
of the land	86
of the city	86
was ordered to	86
the inquisitors were	86
the convent of	86
of the crown	86
was made to	86
of the period	86
hands of the	86
the suprema and	85
of the faith	85
archbishop of toledo	84
the tribunal was	84
and the other	84
council of trent	84
more or less	83
seen in the	83
and they were	83
of the new	83
was sent to	83
of the court	83
it was in	83
him to be	83
the service of	82
in the inquisition	82
that this was	82
amador de los	82
of the order	82
power of the	82
but he was	82
as we shall	81
they had been	81
be sent to	81
for the purpose	81
edict of faith	81
was not until	81
the king of	81
and it is	81
the suprema was	80
and this was	80
in all the	80
autos de fe	80
and not to	80
it to be	80
subject to the	80
as early as	79
the order of	79
it should be	79
name of the	79
as he had	78
the result of	78
a member of	78
i have met	78
as in the	77
which it was	77
be allowed to	77
the reign of	77
and to the	77
of philip ii	77
by the holy	76
of charles v	76
this was a	76
with which the	76
to the church	76
in the name	76
to be made	75
the suprema to	75
the consulta de	75
up to the	75
of the pope	75
a carta acordada	75
the necessity of	75
in consequence of	75
known as the	75
were not to	74
a hundred and	74
to prevent the	74
for the most	74
as he was	74
portion of the	74
there is a	74
more than a	74
the execution of	74
where he was	74
a man of	73
the accused was	73
for it was	73
they should be	73
officials of the	73
in case of	73
which they had	73
in an auto	72
they did not	72
if he had	72
the work of	72
wrote to the	72
the authority of	72
a copy of	72
and on the	71
of the old	71
was that of	71
of the archbishop	71
to the end	71
the absence of	71
authority of the	71
the members of	70
so as to	70
is seen in	70
that there were	70
all the tribunals	70
he would have	70
there was an	70
pain of excommunication	69
the publication of	69
the secular arm	69
the seventeenth century	69
and all the	69
in the auto	69
one of them	69
end of the	69
the concordia of	69
the eighteenth century	68
in the church	68
it will be	68
in the suprema	68
was sentenced to	68
the object of	68
was allowed to	68
the royal council	68
it did not	68
ordered to be	68
that it would	67
we hear of	67
in addition to	67
as late as	67
he should be	67
it must be	67
addressed to the	67
that it should	67
a series of	66
the sixteenth century	66
the right of	66
of the state	66
suspicion of heresy	66
at that time	66
it was to	66
that i have	66
the rest of	66
of the great	66
coleccion de documentos	66
in cases of	66
of the law	65
and that it	65
were sent to	65
to the tribunals	65
of the case	65
and the inquisition	65
carta acordada of	65
the most part	65
which the inquisition	65
was condemned to	65
were ordered to	65
the count of	64
the secular courts	64
and to be	64
the character of	64
the roman inquisition	63
of the first	63
of which was	63
that she was	63
a list of	63
the king to	62
on the ground	62
presence of the	62
he was in	62
to the council	62
of the dead	62
the university of	62
in accordance with	62
the laws of	62
the office of	62
that it is	62
to the stake	61
that he did	61
that the king	61
of god and	61
a fine of	61
as a rule	61
were required to	61
they could not	61
the kingdom of	61
the matter was	60
the part of	60
but they were	60
the middle of	60
to be burnt	60
all of which	60
might have been	60
to which he	60
but there was	60
the benefit of	60
him in the	59
the king was	59
so far as	59
and the inquisitors	59
a decree of	59
and that they	59
he was condemned	59
had been a	59
the auto de	59
the age of	59
it is a	59
was required to	59
tell the truth	59
the law of	59
the tribunal to	59
defence of the	58
in the trial	58
in the secret	58
as they were	58
in his own	58
are told that	58
there were no	58
the influence of	58
the marquis of	58
back to the	58
the other hand	58
in the city	58
to see that	58
submitted to the	57
there had been	57
the arrest of	57
the fate of	57
to the galleys	57
an auto de	57
in the audience	57
at the end	57
when it was	57
years of age	57
that they would	57
the canon law	57
that she had	57
gracia y justicia	57
many of the	57
had been the	57
to those who	57
matters of faith	57
was not the	57
of ferdinand and	57
council of aragon	57
but this was	56
the punishment of	56
the close of	56
favor of the	56
found in the	56
was told that	56
that no one	56
the crown of	56
in which they	56
to be sent	56
hundred and fifty	56
spite of the	56
whom he had	56
the history of	56
he was the	56
were allowed to	56
in place of	56
but it is	55
with regard to	55
of the time	55
privileges of the	55
was regarded as	55
de fe of	55
to say that	55
the case was	55
for the inquisition	55
appealed to the	55
the prosecution of	55
with all the	55
in a convent	55
was not a	55
applied to the	55
as far as	55
the privileges of	55
them to be	55
in the first	54
to take the	54
to leave the	54
case of the	54
that they could	54
that the suprema	54
the barcelona tribunal	54
of the moriscos	54
in the instructions	54
he would be	54
to that of	54
from the king	54
appeal to the	54
to go to	54
the tribunal and	54
two hundred and	53
the course of	53
by the inquisitor	53
he did so	53
for a moment	53
which was the	53
with the inquisition	53
it in the	53
two or three	53
in the royal	53
the protection of	53
to tell the	53
he would not	53
order of the	53
for a year	53
the sentence was	53
to the faith	53
general of the	53
middle of the	53
in which it	53
to the last	53
the tribunals to	52
on the part	52
the inquisitors had	52
and he had	52
the city of	52
the property of	52
as he did	52
for which he	52
the subject of	52
be made to	52
two hundred lashes	52
one or two	52
attention to the	52
to make the	52
them in the	52
it might be	52
of one of	52
in the early	52
the tribunals were	51
on the same	51
was the same	51
visitas de barcelona	51
the records of	51
what he had	51
danvila y collado	51
that in the	51
was told to	51
the exercise of	51
given to the	51
establishment of the	51
i do not	51
had been made	50
the sentence of	50
the royal jurisdiction	50
led to the	50
in the most	50
the prison of	50
the tribunals of	50
copy of the	50
it has been	50
the count de	50
replied that he	50
the head of	50
if they were	50
of the convent	50
for two years	49
said to have	49
the expenses of	49
one of his	49
the duty of	49
by this time	49
included in the	49
secretary of the	49
may have been	49
knowledge of the	49
use of the	49
he had no	49
he is to	49
made to the	49
have been a	49
the kingdoms of	49
who did not	49
to the crown	49
with the same	49
a letter to	49
to return to	49
this did not	49
and one of	48
suppression of the	48
burnt in effigy	48
of the sentence	48
discretion of the	48
juan de la	48
for the future	48
possession of the	48
would not be	48
it was probably	48
by the king	48
to abjure de	48
as that of	48
character of the	48
had already been	48
the spirit of	48
to be paid	48
in the faith	48
of the prisoner	47
publication of the	47
of the bishop	47
over to the	47
of the cathedral	47
the writings of	47
inquisition and the	47
there should be	47
the title of	47
side of the	47
an end to	47
ought to be	47
the truth of	47
was followed by	47
matter of course	47
the works of	47
to have the	47
to the bishop	47
and that of	47
in that of	47
the condition of	47
jews and moors	47
some of them	47
fray juan de	46
to the same	46
he had the	46
of the officials	46
edict of grace	46
have been the	46
was impossible to	46
the church and	46
for some time	46
all this was	46
declared that the	46
which the suprema	46
the catholic faith	46
of the jesuits	46
subjected to the	46
shall see hereafter	46
of the prison	46
the discretion of	46
be found in	46
the congregation of	46
the same day	46
the conduct of	46
of the latter	46
in matters of	46
expulsion of the	46
be given to	46
in the toledo	46
the officials of	46
of the two	46
he was arrested	46
we find the	45
i am not	45
put an end	45
condition of the	45
council of the	45
denounced to the	45
was a matter	45
for which the	45
if the accused	45
tried by the	45
de la fuente	45
in order that	45
with the utmost	45
that they might	45
the receiver of	45
to be an	45
letter to the	45
expenses of the	45
told him that	45
the see of	45
of excommunication and	45
the right to	45
have seen how	45
the suprema had	45
the place of	45
for three years	45
there could be	45
the request of	45
to prove that	44
the question of	44
of the prisoners	44
the castle of	44
and the inquisitor	44
for those who	44
as to his	44
so long as	44
the existence of	44
the nature of	44
the inquisition as	44
for he was	44
a kind of	44
work of the	44
was necessary to	44
they had not	44
to make a	44
more and more	44
of castile and	44
taken to the	44
confined in the	43
should be made	43
he wrote to	43
as one of	43
if they had	43
in the great	43
he said that	43
in one of	43
the decree of	43
was the only	43
from the suprema	43
business of the	43
and those who	43
in the convent	43
to be taken	43
as a matter	43
great number of	43
to charles v	43
of a hundred	43
what was the	43
the inquisition were	43
one of these	43
a portion of	43
the evidence of	43
it was necessary	43
laws of the	43
in the earlier	43
execution of the	43
that those who	43
an account of	43
the aid of	42
the form of	42
sir john shelton	42
the opinions of	42
to this the	42
after the death	42
the face of	42
it was an	42
the establishment of	42
of the clergy	42
it could not	42
of the secular	42
the introduction of	42
in the churches	42
a great number	42
the king that	42
at this period	42
any of the	42
fiscal of the	42
under the restoration	42
she was told	42
there was one	42
the wife of	42
to him and	42
to the accused	42
said that he	42
and by the	42
for him to	42
called upon to	42
prison of the	42
the same as	42
which it had	42
the inquisition should	42
when the inquisitors	41
went to the	41
have seen that	41
orden de processar	41
delivered to the	41
in the matter	41
of this was	41
to give him	41
that he must	41
it could be	41
the index of	41
fact that the	41
of bodleian library	41
don juan de	41
tribunal of the	41
the development of	41
of the catholic	41
would seem to	41
the thirteenth century	41
the pope to	41
to be present	41
of the supreme	41
i de copias	41
a hundred lashes	41
the point of	41
it would have	41
but for the	41
to meet the	41
she had been	41
years of the	41
the middle ages	41
court of the	41
the severity of	41
to be in	41
in the council	40
library of berlin	40
to the archbishop	40
of the auto	40
when they were	40
and there were	40
influence of the	40
even in the	40
an edict of	40
of the nation	40
the testimony of	40
at the moment	40
him as a	40
and the tribunal	40
the ground that	40
he had a	40
or at least	40
and the king	40
of his order	40
him by the	40
were made to	40
if it was	40
the trials of	40
declared to be	40
of the queen	40
of the sixteenth	40
in the spanish	40
himself to the	40
with which he	40
in such a	40
from the inquisition	40
i have been	40
tribunal of toledo	40
continued to be	40
before the tribunal	40
ponce de leon	40
in the kingdom	40
and at the	40
it is easy	39
cause of the	39
was about to	39
declared that he	39
son of the	39
and with the	39
he had done	39
so that they	39
it appears that	39
as those of	39
when there was	39
but the suprema	39
archbishop of seville	39
the inquisitor of	39
court of rome	39
the details of	39
he refused to	39
to pay the	39
the expense of	39
the chapter of	39
the reputation of	39
and again in	39
was that the	39
the purpose of	39
the suprema in	39
would be a	39
of which they	39
it would seem	39
to show that	39
of the highest	39
were in the	39
the rights of	39
prosecution of the	39
the eyes of	39
edicts of grace	39
of philip iv	39
to which they	39
nature of the	39
of the sovereign	39
the case to	39
by the church	39
there was nothing	39
a letter from	39
a source of	39
in no way	39
president of the	39
that he has	39
the privilege of	39
of his life	39
confirmed by the	39
not allowed to	39
were obliged to	39
there was also	39
connected with the	39
had never been	38
on september th	38
all that he	38
belonging to the	38
and a half	38
the destruction of	38
for a time	38
of the house	38
the means of	38
many of them	38
in the tribunal	38
the madrid tribunal	38
so that he	38
the prince of	38
that the tribunal	38
and those of	38
the position of	38
he might be	38
activity of the	38
death of the	38
was given to	38
the cost of	38
for the first	38
him from the	38
placed in the	38
of the conversos	38
relaxed in person	38
the business of	38
de la cruz	38
of heresy and	38
be submitted to	38
under penalty of	38
by order of	38
officers of the	38
accordance with the	38
he was obliged	38
but in the	38
account of his	38
at this time	38
in defence of	38
and for the	38
of the edict	38
the expulsion of	38
in any way	37
arising from the	37
the pope and	37
belonged to the	37
records of the	37
the voice of	37
the author of	37
of the justicia	37
it is the	37
could not have	37
the attention of	37
presented to the	37
that the pope	37
regarded as a	37
hundred lashes and	37
prisons of the	37
the cases of	37
the progress of	37
the saragossa tribunal	37
to the new	37
regard to the	37
to submit to	37
the inquisitors should	37
of the kind	37
in the confessional	37
god and the	37
holy office was	37
if he was	37
to be done	37
of the papal	37
for ten years	37
referred to the	37
by which the	37
of the other	37
by a brief	37
the purity of	37
made by the	37
on june th	37
in the house	37
ordered him to	37
to see the	37
the young man	37
not only to	37
is not to	37
the king had	37
could be no	37
the auto of	37
the orders of	37
the maintenance of	36
and with a	36
him that he	36
they were all	36
cases in which	36
to appear in	36
it is to	36
he was told	36
number of cases	36
in the prison	36
he had never	36
of them were	36
the case and	36
inquisition of spain	36
close of the	36
to the great	36
but there is	36
transferred to the	36
fines and penances	36
the seville tribunal	36
that the inquisitor	36
of the government	36
policy of the	36
letter of the	36
that all the	36
manner in which	36
the accession of	36
there was not	36
had been so	36
of the sovereigns	36
the faith and	36
was taken to	36
when the inquisition	36
the inquisitors shall	36
the son of	36
the royal court	36
of what was	36
of this kind	36
did not know	36
luis de leon	36
him of the	36
all that had	36
the affairs of	36
tribunal of valencia	36
in a few	36
if he is	36
condemned by the	36
it necessary to	36
he went to	36
the secret prisons	35
be deprived of	35
and the royal	35
in the index	35
at once to	35
by the pope	35
if there was	35
with orders to	35
arrested by the	35
were subjected to	35
in such cases	35
head of the	35
it seems to	35
in the world	35
property of the	35
to whom he	35
the life of	35
to his own	35
of such a	35
the administration of	35
all who had	35
arce y reynoso	35
there were many	35
well as the	35
owing to the	35
to the queen	35
abjuration de levi	35
us that the	35
that the holy	35
from the pope	35
would not have	35
the appointment of	35
for the same	35
king of spain	35
he had already	35
to the spanish	35
to him the	35
the first time	35
the commencement of	35
if he did	35
this was followed	35
they would be	35
and the same	35
ought to have	35
affairs of the	35
the removal of	34
tribunals of the	34
of the century	34
were subject to	34
the act of	34
in the absence	34
seccion de mss	34
to receive the	34
into the secret	34
might not be	34
on the st	34
in a consulta	34
the prohibition of	34
in we find	34
which the inquisitors	34
was in vain	34
to the secret	34
and did not	34
was also a	34
of don carlos	34
for more than	34
suprema ordered the	34
towards the end	34
in the trials	34
end to the	34
soon as the	34
and his wife	34
returned to the	34
for the benefit	34
the brief of	34
congregation of the	34
to keep the	34
the royal power	34
in the cathedral	34
return to the	34
s ti officii	34
part in the	34
and the council	34
advantage of the	34
the habit of	34
if it were	34
officials and familiars	34
the people of	34
conduct of the	34
who were to	34
it had not	34
which was to	34
of the affair	34
the efforts of	33
to him by	33
that it could	33
of the town	33
of an inquisitor	33
into the hands	33
carlos de seso	33
he had received	33
such was the	33
by the fact	33
but he had	33
had long been	33
was by no	33
consequence of the	33
were condemned to	33
shows that the	33
under the name	33
them from the	33
in the tribunals	33
for it is	33
the governor of	33
he had heard	33
be placed in	33
to him in	33
la corona de	33
be admitted to	33
appeals to rome	33
to the prison	33
to be found	33
it was so	33
is not a	33
in the following	33
governor of the	33
that there is	33
was held to	33
the mercy of	33
where he had	33
at the age	33
on may th	33
to be published	33
term of grace	33
so that it	33
due to the	33
for the defence	33
of the offence	33
madame la motte	33
was not only	33
that had been	33
only by the	33
and had been	33
the condemnation of	33
orders of the	33
was ready to	33
i have not	33
of the eighteenth	33
rest of the	33
during the reign	33
the example of	33
sent to rome	33
in this case	33
the rules of	33
suspected of heresy	33
be regarded as	33
holy office and	33
that he is	33
efforts of the	32
the manner in	32
does not appear	32
most of the	32
have met with	32
with the royal	32
not have been	32
secretary of state	32
it as a	32
was denounced to	32
at the request	32
of the nobles	32
and the holy	32
there seems to	32
they could be	32
to do with	32
granted to the	32
it was only	32
as much as	32
he was allowed	32
of the seventeenth	32
told to tell	32
who were not	32
the same tribunal	32
the tribunal had	32
modo de proceder	32
in favour of	32
in the later	32
a few years	32
the college of	32
by the royal	32
more than once	32
of the whole	32
this the suprema	32
acts of the	32
as they had	32
details of the	32
on november th	32
with the demon	32
to the receiver	32
on the spot	32
for some years	32
as to their	32
th of may	32
had been condemned	32
the matter to	32
inquisicion de barcelona	32
on october th	32
the st of	32
in it was	32
years of galleys	32
of the population	32
writings of the	32
in the face	32
names of the	32
he was sentenced	31
opinion of the	31
him with a	31
inquisition of the	31
of all that	31
object of the	31
had been in	31
to the other	31
to the effect	31
to listen to	31
in a case	31
as for the	31
shall not be	31
the town of	31
crown of aragon	31
this to the	31
support of the	31
is easy to	31
of aragon and	31
reported to the	31
of the three	31
the officers of	31
he was at	31
he replied that	31
of the congregation	31
of the property	31
held to be	31
ayuda de costa	31
and she was	31
of the condemned	31
they would not	31
to be read	31
benefit of the	31
yet it was	31
inquisitors of saragossa	31
was at the	31
and there is	31
with the king	31
on april th	31
that the accused	31
de la corona	31
xiii de cartas	31
by the council	31
acquainted with the	31
all that was	31
that if he	31
of the count	31
de los reyes	31
the effect that	31
to be arrested	31
in their hands	31
matter of faith	31
to the throne	31
it does not	31
had always been	31
of the roman	31
the proceedings of	31
he wished to	31
to be punished	31
the opportunity of	31
in the appendix	31
i know not	31
and the only	31
of the trials	31
a short time	31
the honor of	31
by means of	31
of the emperor	31
at any moment	31
had come to	31
a hundred thousand	31
use of torture	31
he might have	31
the old inquisition	31
of the secret	31
the errors of	30
to those of	30
of the young	30
the tribunals that	30
the city and	30
had been sent	30
the secular authorities	30
true that the	30
at that moment	30
or to the	30
attached to the	30
in the thirteenth	30
there was some	30
and we have	30
than that of	30
about this time	30
the policy of	30
thrown into the	30
he was made	30
the effect of	30
and the whole	30
master of the	30
of the brief	30
in the records	30
at the court	30
of the moors	30
it is impossible	30
there can be	30
the fifteenth century	30
proved to be	30
to the court	30
the door of	30
because they were	30
of the catechism	30
in the court	30
history of spain	30
not fail to	30
he had made	30
the memory of	30
in every way	30
on his return	30
corona de aragon	30
house of the	30
the faith of	30
of the world	30
which was not	30
he shall be	30
of the room	30
to be kept	30
the secretary of	30
in so far	30
is said to	30
to be allowed	30
duke of alva	30
in which there	30
the arrival of	30
in person and	30
he ordered the	30
see that the	30
of faith and	30
the spiritual courts	30
out of his	30
given to him	30
of the matter	30
on pain of	30
to the city	30
the whole of	30
there was little	30
to philip ii	30
was transferred to	30
the inquisition is	29
the tribunals and	29
the bishops of	29
inquisition was not	29
of the fiscal	29
to appeal to	29
the earlier period	29
kingdoms of aragon	29
there was another	29
was no longer	29
of that of	29
the sake of	29
the murder of	29
reign of philip	29
of the cortes	29
to be given	29
the relations between	29
two hundred ducats	29
towards the close	29
the catechism of	29
was a man	29
attention of the	29
by the fiscal	29
were forbidden to	29
the functions of	29
the inquisition that	29
the war of	29
influence on the	29
and the rest	29
we have no	29
of the proceedings	29
made in the	29
of the last	29
severity of the	29
it would not	29
violation of the	29
for a few	29
of the bishops	29
king and the	29
she did not	29
took advantage of	29
the sight of	29
was the first	29
that of a	29
was instructed to	29
in a manner	29
in his hand	29
was the cause	29
civil and criminal	29
copies of the	29
in front of	29
have been no	29
the effort to	29
paid to the	29
the advice of	29
and in a	29
came to be	29
the person of	29
to the viceroy	29
to do this	29
they might be	29
de leon y	29
for the sake	29
the custom of	29
i did not	29
in a low	29
and i have	29
a sentence of	29
of the confiscations	29
the payment of	29
he had to	29
de los antiguos	29
must not be	29
of prohibited books	29
it was ordered	29
where it was	29
service of god	29
in the morning	29
a second time	29
the pope had	29
there was the	29
after his death	29
fray dominic de	29
an order to	29
had nothing to	29
the activity of	29
which there were	29
him on the	29
way to the	29
to be relaxed	29
the society of	29
council of state	29
the bull of	29
was burnt in	29
spite of this	29
the royal treasury	29
functions of the	29
where there were	29
should have been	29
the practice of	28
the inquisition would	28
ordered it to	28
apt to be	28
to the ground	28
the early period	28
two of the	28
on both sides	28
and when the	28
service of the	28
of the duke	28
him that the	28
the latter was	28
the religious orders	28
to the bishops	28
had not the	28
case of a	28
caused by the	28
as it is	28
in his hands	28
control of the	28
continued to the	28
to him to	28
di stato in	28
was paid to	28
represented to the	28
he returned to	28
the time when	28
we shall have	28
king and queen	28
one of those	28
but that he	28
number of the	28
the jews and	28
the report of	28
familiars of the	28
as a heretic	28
we find him	28
of which were	28
the love of	28
of his office	28
but i have	28
occupied by the	28
de santa cruz	28
the strength of	28
the claims of	28
de fe was	28
as if he	28
in the way	28
of spain and	28
the other side	28
in presence of	28
that if the	28
a consulta of	28
he had seen	28
in the holy	28
of the principal	28
as i have	28
i would not	28
of the day	28
that they must	28
dungeons of the	28
said that the	28
place in the	28
the inquisition at	28
in vain that	28
seemed to be	28
deprived of the	28
there is an	28
in and again	28
it is necessary	28
in all cases	28
will be found	28
the dignity of	28
the salaries of	28
los antiguos reinos	28
the marquis de	28
years in the	28
prior of the	28
organization of the	28
opposition to the	28
the loss of	28
even to the	28
appeared in the	28
of the french	27
pointed out that	27
a few days	27
he is a	27
because he had	27
but the inquisitors	27
he says that	27
of the bull	27
the assent of	27
inquisition did not	27
independence of the	27
condemned to the	27
he and his	27
she could not	27
the crime of	27
in the eighteenth	27
reclusion in a	27
development of the	27
archivio di stato	27
the examination of	27
and i will	27
from the holy	27
in the course	27
complained of the	27
the inquisitors in	27
as he could	27
to examine the	27
the accounts of	27
prosecuted by the	27
he died in	27
his way to	27
not only in	27
was in a	27
was accused of	27
at the head	27
he declared that	27
in possession of	27
was subjected to	27
at one time	27
the centre of	27
medina del campo	27
the prisons of	27
dominic de roxas	27
on march th	27
libro xiii de	27
de los bienes	27
to preserve the	27
the suprema replied	27
that the case	27
don antonio de	27
who had not	27
admitted to reconciliation	27
to interfere with	27
proceedings of the	27
as to what	27
if he would	27
the hope of	27
no means of	27
communicated to the	27
if there were	27
he had said	27
are not to	27
to the duke	27
stato in roma	27
of his father	27
all who were	27
against the inquisition	27
on august th	27
trials of the	27
there were two	27
the enforcement of	27
don carlos de	27
of which we	27
told that he	27
to the utmost	27
the archbishopric of	27
to be placed	27
the matter of	27
that there should	27
it was no	27
decision of the	27
if we may	27
of the curia	27
no trace of	27
rights of the	27
him with the	27
induced him to	27
charge of the	27
which i have	27
secrecy of the	27
because it was	27
not only the	27
to secure the	27
of the articles	27
be required to	26
punishment of the	26
to appear before	26
with the other	26
he is not	26
took place in	26
go to the	26
confined to the	26
where they were	26
to obtain the	26
nationale de france	26
when the suprema	26
author of the	26
prior to the	26
abjure de vehementi	26
a part of	26
sent to him	26
a case in	26
inquisition in the	26
the crown and	26
outside of the	26
opinions of the	26
the assistance of	26
the pope was	26
ordered them to	26
the entrance of	26
of the middle	26
on the day	26
him and his	26
to be his	26
the fiscal of	26
him in his	26
saying that he	26
only in the	26
and the case	26
castile and aragon	26
the acts of	26
that some of	26
to be reconciled	26
the oath of	26
cognizance of the	26
which led to	26
that of his	26
prison and sanbenito	26
but this is	26
would be impossible	26
the old christians	26
required to abjure	26
in the castle	26
to philip iv	26
and even the	26
of his trial	26
and as he	26
to the death	26
the importance of	26
question as to	26
to have a	26
obedience to the	26
on july th	26
the affair of	26
the support of	26
the articles of	26
the suprema for	26
in his defence	26
the danger of	26
none of the	26
the autos de	26
of their own	26
the discovery of	26
inquisition of valladolid	26
as suspected of	26
that it might	26
what i have	26
in the exercise	26
was deprived of	26
told that the	26
had been arrested	26
archbishop of saragossa	26
the salvation of	26
zeal for the	26
found to be	26
the value of	26
apply to the	26
only to the	26
is necessary to	26
appear in the	26
a good catholic	26
which there was	26
by ferdinand and	26
to be of	26
to accept the	26
was referred to	26
was but a	26
of the war	26
the defence of	26
which we have	26
de levi and	26
for the present	25
the inquisitor to	25
of what he	25
no time in	25
and then the	25
the war with	25
to do it	25
part of his	25
about the same	25
of jesus christ	25
made use of	25
more than the	25
to the supreme	25
a man who	25
time of the	25
mentioned in the	25
and condemned to	25
the inquisition for	25
to be held	25
the trial was	25
to the sovereigns	25
th of april	25
him in a	25
of the evidence	25
by which he	25
be able to	25
to be submitted	25
the most important	25
this is the	25
but when the	25
all the other	25
of the dominican	25
the opinion of	25
to order the	25
may be assumed	25
put to death	25
he was accused	25
it was his	25
which the king	25
to him that	25
three or four	25
is in the	25
deprived of his	25
he came to	25
the result was	25
in these cases	25
church of san	25
them on the	25
after which the	25
of the charges	25
on the road	25
was forced to	25
the inquisition could	25
in a moment	25
no allusion to	25
th of september	25
he could be	25
to obey the	25
of the triana	25
he was taken	25
cartas de jesuitas	25
be difficult to	25
the way of	25
the jews were	25
holy office in	25
be permitted to	25
not to have	25
was declared to	25
the term of	25
of the judges	25
of two hundred	25
the penalties of	25
had been reconciled	25
which she had	25
the king in	25
law of moses	25
of course the	25
of a man	25
as she was	25
was on the	25
in the new	25
jurisdiction over the	25
as regards the	25
five years of	25
the hour of	25
the inquisition did	25
they are not	25
the sacrament of	25
and the bishop	25
of the age	25
he must be	25
the prisoner was	25
in his house	25
complaints of the	25
don juan alvarez	25
based on the	25
the valladolid tribunal	25
would seem that	25
he said to	25
hundred and sixty	25
of the valencia	25
the day of	25
he had given	25
of charles iii	25
of the th	25
by the tribunals	25
in a tone	25
request of the	25
abjure de levi	25
of the public	24
the night of	24
his wife and	24
a papal brief	24
six years of	24
it is evident	24
not likely to	24
could only be	24
aid of the	24
don pedro de	24
of all kinds	24
men and women	24
if it is	24
followed by a	24
on december th	24
and that a	24
while he was	24
fate of the	24
one of its	24
of the victims	24
in the war	24
duty of the	24
not in the	24
placed on the	24
of the institution	24
appears to have	24
this time the	24
the revenues of	24
relating to the	24
the same with	24
to defend the	24
the first of	24
show that the	24
of the civil	24
on which the	24
the story of	24
gave rise to	24
required to be	24
replied that it	24
the jews of	24
would be difficult	24
war of succession	24
they had no	24
the day before	24
la ley de	24
of the culprit	24
when he had	24
have seen the	24
of the college	24
do not know	24
in the present	24
themselves to the	24
result of this	24
at the expense	24
inflicted on the	24
and we shall	24
the catholic religion	24
being informed of	24
she was a	24
notary of the	24
the period of	24
some of his	24
unity of faith	24
rather than to	24
the following year	24
in the sentence	24
to that effect	24
to allow the	24
the royal officials	24
no less than	24
that the fiscal	24
of the fuero	24
they must be	24
not subject to	24
a state of	24
to suspend the	24
to maintain the	24
enforcement of the	24
of the audiencia	24
it is said	24
he seems to	24
that the new	24
addressed to all	24
derived from the	24
to induce the	24
they are to	24
in the seventeenth	24
an order of	24
in which to	24
evidence of the	24
years of exile	24
the papers of	24
result of the	24
attention was paid	24
all the papers	24
the denunciation of	24
necessary for the	24
of juan de	24
the beginning of	24
of new christians	24
was subject to	24
share in the	24
to be brought	24
introduction of the	24
at a time	24
in the galleys	24
no hesitation in	24
parts of the	24
if the inquisitors	24
of aragon to	24
to be admitted	24
the side of	24
to be used	24
they should not	24
to the people	24
of the virgin	24
belief in the	24
relaxations in person	24
he was denounced	24
in the public	24
trial of the	24
all the officials	24
in the streets	24
to come to	24
that the archbishop	24
employed in the	24
padre fidel fita	24
in the old	24
lost no time	24
it was found	24
in the bull	24
himself to be	23
one hundred and	23
of that city	23
be subjected to	23
operations of the	23
john of austria	23
in the other	23
an opportunity of	23
on the rd	23
allusion to the	23
the state and	23
which might be	23
of the members	23
he had only	23
he made a	23
could have been	23
to the truth	23
the difficulty of	23
gave to the	23
the interests of	23
a couple of	23
with that of	23
took possession of	23
was still in	23
spirit of the	23
of which it	23
under which the	23
temper of the	23
the favor of	23
the results of	23
palace of the	23
been sent to	23
to believe that	23
commissioner of the	23
to one of	23
claims of the	23
of the country	23
the prospect of	23
it would appear	23
the surrender of	23
the consent of	23
the doctrines of	23
they were the	23
and some other	23
for many years	23
returned to spain	23
the justice of	23
the later period	23
the operations of	23
sentence of the	23
informed of the	23
in the next	23
imposed on the	23
receiver of confiscations	23
in a brief	23
of a great	23
of the chapter	23
of the past	23
ayudas de costa	23
leading to the	23
all the churches	23
of philip v	23
the rigor of	23
and sent to	23
he has been	23
this seems to	23
it was with	23
was admitted to	23
publication of evidence	23
no one was	23
not until that	23
embodied in the	23
to be seized	23
the other tribunals	23
to escape from	23
importance of the	23
rigor of the	23
five hundred ducats	23
would be the	23
who was a	23
as there was	23
may be said	23
and as the	23
when this was	23
the knowledge of	23
this had been	23
and the next	23
this was done	23
he knew that	23
led him to	23
record of the	23
complained to the	23
there came a	23
a total of	23
informs us that	23
each of the	23
the inquisition from	23
of the faithful	23
the chief justice	23
says that he	23
in there was	23
been able to	23
were burnt in	23
we chance to	23
ay de mi	23
th of december	23
of the fact	23
it is certain	23
as it had	23
after which he	23
he was prosecuted	23
of the bible	23
order of st	23
which he could	23
catechism of carranza	23
the decrees of	23
addition to the	23
made of the	23
the royal courts	23
of jews and	23
nothing of the	23
her to the	23
for four years	23
the edicts of	23
cause of his	23
the relations of	23
judge of confiscations	23
information as to	23
number of familiars	23
to observe the	23
to proceed against	22
in the edict	22
for the prosecution	22
more than two	22
change in the	22
this was an	22
not hesitate to	22
eyes of the	22
he persisted in	22
to follow the	22
to be put	22
prado y cuesta	22
of the early	22
de los dichos	22
to the count	22
and a fine	22
with which it	22
notary of sequestrations	22
and no one	22
ordered the inquisitors	22
the reading of	22
be gathered from	22
that the royal	22
the secrecy of	22
in conjunction with	22
to make him	22
with the suprema	22
wealth of the	22
is evident that	22
to understand the	22
the foundation of	22
of the concordia	22
was only a	22
for six months	22
with instructions to	22
the culprit was	22
could be found	22
the declarations of	22
the sum of	22
in virtue of	22
easy to understand	22
of a few	22
nothing to do	22
when she was	22
not a single	22
de la dicha	22
ten years of	22
in his heart	22
the state of	22
to rome and	22
as they could	22
and when he	22
and the like	22
replied that the	22
imposed on him	22
condemned as a	22
it was as	22
that all who	22
he issued a	22
in this he	22
interfere with the	22
if any one	22
was thrown into	22
inquisitors of the	22
for the faith	22
as a prison	22
the alternative of	22
was confirmed by	22
can be no	22
to hear of	22
the houses of	22
that could be	22
an old christian	22
to whom the	22
as if they	22
be reduced to	22
in spain and	22
the royal authority	22
the doctrine of	22
leon y de	22
the date of	22
in the cases	22
to give the	22
by one of	22
of all this	22
the fear of	22
an object of	22
to god and	22
which the tribunal	22
professor of theology	22
well as to	22
was informed that	22
the blood of	22
of the place	22
at the discretion	22
i have heard	22
he was sent	22
no attention to	22
the cathedral of	22
issued by the	22
of the power	22
with the result	22
the confiscation of	22
was arrested and	22
from the inquisitor	22
the inquisition the	22
and the pope	22
on his way	22
a royal order	22
to wear the	22
one in the	22
privileges and exemptions	22
in a matter	22
the affair was	22
general and suprema	22
y de castilla	22
ambassador at rome	22
of a thousand	22
the conclusion of	22
will not be	22
a term of	22
face of the	22
the list of	22
as though the	22
issued a decree	22
of the crime	22
was known as	22
the source of	22
and who was	22
to the jurisdiction	22
is impossible to	22
read in the	22
of september th	22
the province of	22
seem to be	22
to enforce it	22
some of these	22
the accused to	22
her to be	22
story of the	22
had been taken	22
in the town	22
the appearance of	22
the work was	22
zeal of the	22
had been done	22
to the house	22
with full powers	22
for a brief	22
of the year	22
was called in	22
the restoration of	22
before the inquisition	22
under the title	22
there were also	22
of the university	22
i have done	22
on the death	22
and they had	22
was submitted to	22
from the city	22
a public auto	21
in the year	21
the will of	21
brought against him	21
had not yet	21
relations with the	21
although it was	21
the burden of	21
for the time	21
through the streets	21
to render the	21
matute y luquin	21
the descendants of	21
the tribunal for	21
as the inquisition	21
the mass of	21
the midst of	21
exposed to the	21
in the affair	21
to remove the	21
to the number	21
led to a	21
the moors of	21
the space of	21
the suprema that	21
the people were	21
held in the	21
of these were	21
there might be	21
th of january	21
of the ordinary	21
him for a	21
removal of the	21
inquisitors of valladolid	21
that the council	21
he was still	21
of the former	21
be delivered to	21
it was difficult	21
the zeal of	21
put to the	21
chief of the	21
by the toledo	21
the toledo auto	21
in the eyes	21
to enter the	21
but the inquisition	21
had been given	21
to remain in	21
came to him	21
the origin of	21
no matter how	21
of the depositions	21
and he could	21
the low countries	21
there were some	21
by the secular	21
if he were	21
died in the	21
of the persons	21
and as such	21
a sense of	21
the concurrence of	21
to them and	21
of the system	21
in the latter	21
it was too	21
it was for	21
for five years	21
the judge of	21
archbishop of valencia	21
there is not	21
an act of	21
attempt was made	21
there were but	21
from the court	21
although he was	21
the fiscal was	21
relations of the	21
in a memorial	21
don john of	21
he had written	21
of the laws	21
judge of the	21
general and the	21
not to the	21
of the greatest	21
to the prisoner	21
in a monastery	21
the old man	21
on which he	21
the constitution of	21
manrique de lara	21
was condemned as	21
which would have	21
or in the	21
such as the	21
to the flames	21
a still more	21
find the suprema	21
the exception of	21
in a state	21
disregard of the	21
which was a	21
which they could	21
did not prevent	21
as a whole	21
of the work	21
that he may	21
compared with the	21
shown by the	21
don diego de	21
the venetian envoy	21
active and passive	21
the church had	21
don ferdinand morales	21
the seat of	21
the rd of	21
the scene of	21
an attempt to	21
of the evil	21
to a hundred	21
was the most	21
brought to the	21
from the beginning	21
exercise of the	21
have been made	21
fear of the	21
in the midst	21
of this and	21
the powers of	21
were taken to	21
of them had	21
half of the	21
de los que	21
the temper of	21
form of a	21
set forth in	21
was expected to	21
who could not	21
the dominican convent	21
a salary of	21
in opposition to	21
the question was	21
to perpetual prison	21
him not to	21
by all the	21
that they may	21
command of the	21
of the truth	21
as a lutheran	21
but that the	21
the causes of	21
there must be	21
we find it	21
there would be	21
life of the	21
number of persons	21
with his own	21
official of the	21
where there was	21
condemned to be	21
says that the	21
to it and	21
came to the	20