Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
16931If I see nothing to admire in a unit, shall I admire a million units?
169315,"Have you lately heard how any present rich man, here or elsewhere, got his estate?"
169316,"Do you know of a fellow- citizen... who has lately committed an error proper for us to be warned against and avoid?"
16931But have not all prophets and ethical teachers had something of this aspect to their conservative contemporaries?
16931How is it people manage to live on, so aimless as they are?
16931If he were alive to- day, would he not be bewildered by much of our talk about the rights of men and animals?
16931Shall we face them with Washington''s courage, wisdom, and success?
16931To this ancient pessimism Emerson makes answer with a hard question--"We grant that human life is mean, but how did we find out that it was mean?"
16931Whence came this social wisdom?
16931Why must he have horses, fine garments, handsome apartments, access to public houses and places of amusement?
16931Why needs any man be rich?
16931and again,"Do you love truth for truth''s sake, and will you endeavor impartially to find it, receive it yourself, and communicate it to others?"
19935Am I not too protected a person?
19935Are we to look for the sources of his thought in Kant or Jacobi, in Fichte or Schelling?
19935But what would those two divinities of his, Plato and Socrates, have said of a man who''could not give an account of himself if challenged''?
19935But who shall say that he discovers that''spontaneous overflow of powerful feeling,''which a great poet has made the fundamental element of poetry?
19935How does he stand towards Parmenides and Zeno, the Egotheism of the Sufis, or the position of the Megareans?
19935Is not this to make men forget that not forms but duties-- not names but righteousness and love-- are enjoined?''
19935Is not this to make vain the gift of God?
19935Is there not a wide disparity between the lot of me and the lot of thee, my poor brother, my poor sister?''
19935Shall we put him on the shelf with the Stoics or the Mystics, with Quietist, Pantheist, Determinist?
19935Was he the prince of Transcendentalists, or the prince of Idealists?
19935Was not that too, like the Communion Service, a form that tended to deaden the spirit?
19935Why should professional labour and that of the counting- house be paid so disproportionately to the labour of the porter and the woodsawer?
19935Why should we be awed by the name of Action?
13088Fear Death? 13088 For whom is it in the last analysis that you legislate?
13088Is it even so?
13088Is it not so much death?
13088Is that music, after all,one may ask,"which leaves so much to the performer, and is that poetry, after all, which leaves so much to the reader?"
13088Say not so,Cried I when I again could find my breath, For I had seen the whiteness of his face,"How shall I come if thee it frighteneth?"
13088Thou dost not seek to know What spirits are these thou seest?
13088Thou who dost honor science and love art, Pray who are these, whose potent dignity Doth eminently set them thus apart?
13088To what end is all this beneficence, all this conscience, all this theory?
13088And how dare any one, if he could, pluck away the coulisses, stage effects and ceremonies by which they live?
13088And what kind of a man was Stevenson?
13088Do the thoughts and phrases which float about in it have a meaning which bears any relation to the meaning they bear in the language of thinkers?
13088Does all the patriotic talk, the talk about the United States and its future, have any significance as patriotism?
13088Does any one believe that the passion of the American people for learning and for antiquity is a slight and accidental thing?
13088Does any one believe that the taste for imitation old furniture is a pose?
13088Does it not tend to close the avenues between the soul and the universe?
13088Does it poetically represent the state of feeling of any class of American citizens towards their country?
13088For what is so useful, so educational, so inspiring, to a timid and conservative man, as to do something inconsistent and regrettable?
13088He himself regards his work as a toy; and how can we do otherwise?
13088Here is Alcott by my door,--yet is the union more profound?
13088His own words give us a picture of him during that ride:--"What said my man when my betossed soul Did not attend him as we rode?"
13088His prologue and overture are excellent, but where is the argument?
13088In the succeeding verses we are lapped into a charming reverie, and then at the end suddenly jolted by the question,"What is it all about?"
13088Is it a wonder that this man was venerated with an almost superstitious regard in Italy, and in the sixteenth century?
13088Is it individualism of any statable kind?
13088Or would you find the nearest equivalent to this emotion in the breast of the educated tramp of France, or Germany, or England?
13088The traveller as he passeth through these deserts asketh of her''who builded them?''
13088Their natures were electrically repellent, but from which did the greater force radiate?
13088This perpetual splitting up of love into two species, one of which is condemned, but admitted to be useful-- is it not degrading?
13088Thy false uncle-- Dost thou attend me?"
13088What are these thoughts?"
13088What difference does it make whether a man who can talk like this is following an argument or not?
13088What is he that he should resist their will, and think or act for himself?
13088What is natural asceticism but a lack of vigor?
13088What is the one end which all means go to effect?
13088What is the right use?
13088What is there in these figures that they leave us so awestruck, that they seem so like the sound of trumpets blowing from a spiritual world?
13088What matter if Æsop appear a little too much like an American citizen, so long as his points tell?
13088Where is the substantial artistic content that shall feed our souls?
13088Why is it that we refuse to judge him by his own utterances?
13088_ How came he there_?
8641Did not Hawthorne,I said,"predict something like this in an article in the''Atlantic Monthly''?"
8641Do I?
8641We know those who have reached the goal, but who can tell how many have fallen by the way?
8641What do I think of Wasson?
8641What hope is there for him,they said,"in such a profession?
8641And in what way could he deliver this message?
8641And who is that plainly dressed girl with the meekly determined look who goes back and forth so quietly and regularly?
8641And why is it?
8641Are the Rocky Mountains her monument; and shall the Falls of Niagara chant forever her requiem?"
8641At another time he came to me and said,"What deep problems of government are you thinking over there all by yourself?"
8641At the time of the Dred Scott decision, he exclaimed:"Is Liberty dead?
8641But did he contribute one great thought or one grand and salutary imagination to the world''s stock?
8641But how is he to persuade others to take an interest in these subjects?
8641But is not this effort a virtue in itself?
8641But why multiply these unpleasant examples of misrepresentation?
8641Can the descendant of five generations of New England clergymen have the same blood in his veins that warmed the hearts of Marshal Ney and Mirabeau?
8641Could a chief justice have decided the case better?
8641Did he lay a noble emphasis upon any great truth or order of truths and so recommend it effectually to the attention and consideration of mankind?
8641Did he realize the magnitude of the work before him-- one which thousands of patriotic men have since attempted and signally failed to accomplish?
8641Did this man of heroic nature lack the courage to face tragedy?]
8641Does he mean the spirit of the age?
8641Does he partially expose here a peculiarity in his literary procedure?
8641Does it so much as breathe upon them a salubrious air?
8641Had Judge Story already discovered a centrifugal and uncontrollable element in the man?
8641He walked out into the streets, and somebody said to him,''What think you of Athenian liberty?''
8641How could he make known to others what was in his full heart, except from the pulpit?
8641How could it be otherwise?
8641How could it happen that Hawthorne deceived himself?
8641How did these bare, bleak and barren rocks come to be inhabited?
8641How did they get there?"
8641How should this be, unless, indeed, the century as a whole is inferior, and prominence in it is no token of greatness?
8641If a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, what should be said of unripe and superficial thinking?
8641If his friends did not agree with him he would reply with a mildly interrogative"Yes?"
8641In fine, does his work serve to enlarge the souls, enlighten the minds, direct the wills or quicken and inspire the better powers of man?
8641Is it not better for us to look at the matter in this way?
8641Is it possible that he was in the right, and men like Emerson, Ripley, and James Freeman Clarke in the wrong?
8641Is not all progress in this world accomplished as the frog escaped from the well, by jumping up three feet and falling back two?
8641Is not the very crown of character that which we derive from failure, penitence, and self- reproach?
8641Is the valley of the Mississippi her grave?
8641It is not likely the boy is a genius, and who is going to purchase his pictures?"
8641May not the career of any great man be compared to the course of a river?
8641My wife seized me by the arm, half terrified, and said,''Wendell, what are you going to do?''
8641Or did he even write a single sentence which one treasures up as an imperishable jewel?
8641Perpetual constraint and self- denial may strengthen character, but will human nature be better for it in the end?
8641Surely enough true civilization is and always has been an immediate necessity: a necessity like the feast of Tantalus: but how is it to be realized?
8641Then she wrote on the paper:"Where is my father?"
8641Was it an inherited public tendency from the spirit of intolerance which formerly persecuted the Quakers?
8641Was there a strange fatality in the name, so that Patrick Henry might say with added force,"Gentlemen may cry peace, peace, but there is no peace"?
8641Was this the summary and net result of their stroll in Walden woods?
8641Wasson''s direct influence during his life was limited to a very small circle; but who can tell how far it extended indirectly beyond this?
8641What answer can be made to such accusations?
8641What but a future candidate for the senate of the United States, or even for the presidency?
8641What does Emerson intend by trusting the time?
8641What else can we expect of them?
8641What good would a Webster''s dictionary have been at Harper''s Ferry?
8641When it is a question of motive, of moral consciousness, how are such charges to be refuted?
8641Who can doubt that this was a personal experience with him, as it has been with some others?
8641Who can remember the like of it?
8641Who indeed can explain it?
8641Who, looking on these things, does not acknowledge that man is indeed fearfully as well as wonderfully made?
8641Why does he consider Miss Fuller to have had a strong, coarse nature, and to have been morally unsound?
8641Will you come?"
8641With such an achievement at the age of twenty- six, what might not have been expected of his maturer years,--of the full fruition of his genius?
8641and that Alcott answered,"Waldo, why are you not here?
3673Do you think the porter and the cook have no experiences, no wonders for you? 3673 Is America a musical nation?"
3673Is there any virtue in a man''s skin that you must touch it?
36733 What is character?
3673A newspaper music column prints an incident( so how can we assume that it is not true?)
3673A painter paints a sunset-- can he paint the setting sun?
3673And if so, of what will it be composed?
3673And then-- what is the soul?
3673At such times, shall he not better turn to those greater souls, rather than to the external, the immediate, and the"Garish Day"?
3673But is Plato a classic or towards the remote?
3673But where is the bridge placed?--at the end of the road or only at the end of our vision?
3673But where is the definite expression of late- spring against early- summer, of happiness against optimism?
3673But where is the divine substance?
3673But, indeed, is not enough manifestation already there?
3673Can an inspiration come from a blank mind?
3673Can it DO this?
3673Can it be done by anything short of an act of mesmerism on the part of the composer or an act of kindness on the part of the listener?
3673Can music do MORE than this?
3673Can not some of the most valuable kinds of utility and inspiration come from humility in its highest and purest forms?
3673Can you read him today?
3673Carlyle would have Emerson teach by more definite signs, rather than interpret his revelations, or shall we say preach?
3673Could the art of music, or the art of anything have a more profound reason for being than this?
3673Could you journey, with equal benefit, if they were less so?
3673Does the progress of intrinsic beauty or truth( we assume there is such a thing) have its exposures as well as its discoveries?
3673Does the success of program music depend more upon the program than upon the music?
3673For does he not say that"wherever a man goes, men will pursue him with their dirty institutions"?
3673For does not Emerson tell them this when he says"What you are talks so loud, that I can not hear what you say"?
3673He would have found that painful,"for was he not a part with her?"
3673How far afield can music go and keep honest as well as reasonable or artistic?
3673How far can the composer be held accountable?
3673How many masterpieces have been prevented from blossoming in this way?
3673If Emerson''s manner is not always beautiful in accordance with accepted standards, why not accept a few other standards?
3673If Genius is the most indebted, how much does it owe to those who would, but do not easily ride with it?
3673If it does, what is the use of the music, if it does not, what is the use of the program?
3673If nature is not enthusiastic about explanation, why should Tschaikowsky be?
3673If so what?
3673If so why?
3673If there is a weakness here is it the fault of substance or only of manner?
3673In how far does it sustain the soul or the soul it?
3673Intuitions( artistic or not?)
3673Is Classicism a poor relation of time-- not of man?
3673Is Emerson or the English climate to blame for this?
3673Is a demagogue a friend of the people because he will lie to them to make them cry and raise false hopes?
3673Is a thing classic or romantic because it is or is not passed by that biologic-- that indescribable stream- of- change going on in all life?
3673Is his music American or African?
3673Is it a matter limited only by the composer''s power of expressing what lies in his subjective or objective consciousness?
3673Is it a part of the soul?
3673Is it all a bridge?--or is there no bridge because there is no gulf?
3673Is it not program- music raised to the nth power or rather reduced to the minus nth power?
3673Is it not the courage-- the spiritual hopefulness in his humility that makes this story possible and true?
3673Is it not this trait in his character that sets him above all creeds-- that gives him inspired belief in the common mind and soul?
3673Is it the composer''s fault that man has only ten fingers?
3673Is not our weak suggestion needed only for those content with their own hopelessness?
3673Is not the asking that it be made more manifest forgetting that"we are not strong by our power to penetrate, but by our relatedness?"
3673Is that a doctrine?
3673Now all of these translucent axioms are true( are not axioms always true?
3673On the other hand is not all music, program- music,--is not pure music, so called, representative in its essence?
3673Or is it enough to let the matter rest on the pleasure mainly physical, of the tones, their color, succession, and relations, formal or informal?
3673Or is it limited by any limitations of the composer?
3673Ruskin also says:"Suppose I like the finite curves best, who shall say I''m right or wrong?
3673Someone says:"Be specific-- what great fundamentals?"
3673Something that will help answer Alton Locke''s question:"What has Emerson for the working- man?"
3673The composer, the performer( if there be any), or those who have to listen?
3673Then the world may ask"Can the one true national"this"or"that"be killed by its own discoverer?"
3673Was man governing himself?
3673What does it all mean?
3673What is behind it all?
3673What is the source of these instinctive feelings, these vague intuitions and introspective sensations?
3673What part of substance is manner?
3673What part of these supplements are opposites?
3673What part of this duality is polarity?
3673What will you substitute for the mountain lake, for his friend''s character, etc.?
3673Whence cometh the wonder of a moment?
3673Where is the line to be drawn between the expression of subjective and objective emotion?
3673Who can be forever melancholy"with Aeolian music like this"?
3673Who knows but this pulpit aroused the younger Emerson to the possibilities of intuitive reasoning in spiritual realms?
3673Why must the scarecrow of the keyboard-- the tyrant in terms of the mechanism( be it Caruso or a Jew''s- harp) stare into every measure?
3673Will more signs create a greater sympathy?
3673Will you substitute anything?
3673Would you have the indefinite paths ALWAYS supplemented by the shadow of the definite one of a first influence?
3673Would you have the universal always supplemented by the shadow of the personal?
3673Would you have the youthful enthusiasm of rebellion, which Emerson carried beyond his youth always supplemented by the shadow of experience?
3673You may be near when his stern old aunt in the duty of her Puritan conscience asks him:"Have you made your peace with God"?
3673and if so who and what is to determine the degree of its failure or success?
3673design to establish a"course at Rome,"to raise the standard of American music,( or the standard of American composers-- which is it?)
8777Can_ you_ tell us?
8777How about Matthew Arnold?
8777How did he look?
8777Let me see,he replied;"is not he the man who was at the same university with Matthew Arnold, and who could tell us nothing of him?"
8777Longfellow amused me by making two epigrams:--''What is autobiography?
8777Longfellow, will you turn down my coat collar?
8777Now,said the professor,"you do n''t mean to tell me that I have got to that yet?
8777When I came home from my pleasant visit to your house last week( or was it a day or two before last week? 8777 Why ca n''t you stay?"
8777Why, who did, then?
8777Why,he exclaimed, with a most astonished air,"is that you?
8777You did n''t?
8777''But, Martin, are n''t you very tired?''
8777''Why, how old is he?''
8777----?''
8777A few days afterward some one was heard to say,"Mr. Emerson, how did you like Professor----?"
8777After a brief visit Longfellow was about to withdraw, when Janin detained him, saying:''What can I do for you in Paris?
8777Again:"Will it be too late for a few paragraphs about Forcey the Willson?
8777Am I right or wrong?"
8777And again:"Have thee seen and heard the Hindoo Mohini?
8777And again:-- How do you suppose that unskillful scholars are to live, if Fields should one day die?
8777And can you tell me anything?
8777And when?"
8777And why?
8777Any smell of violets in the distance?
8777At each turn he regarded Longfellow, and at length came up, and taking his hand said:"''Is this Professor Longfellow?
8777But how about this''Faust''?
8777But the mystery of decadence, the long sunsetting, the loss of power-- what do they mean?
8777Can you not burn down the Boston Athenaeum to- night?
8777Could you contrive to print it on a fly- leaf, if I get it ready, and put a little sort of dedicatory poem at the end of it?
8777Did artists ever before find such an eye and such an ear?
8777Do you know anything about this pestilent manuscript she raves about?
8777Do you?"
8777Ever read his history of the''Ten Great Religions?''
8777Genius?
8777Has the French book on Spiritualism come yet?
8777He felt a certain brotherhood with Robert Burns, and early loved his genius; but where were two more unlike?
8777He wrote in 1877:--"When are you coming back from your Cottage on the Cliffs?
8777Her daughter was told that when the President heard her name he seized her hand, saying,"Is this the little woman who made this great war?"
8777How could he render again the knowledge of divine goodness and divine love which were revealed to him?
8777How could it be otherwise, with such guests as he entertained, and with his own unflagging vivacity and his admirable social gifts?
8777How could it know so much?"
8777How did it seem to elbow thy way to the polls through throngs of men folk?"
8777How did they draw their sweet, refreshing tint from the brown earth, or the limpid air, or the white light?
8777How do you stand it?
8777How is Pope?''
8777How long he waited, or what thoughts were stirred by this first glimpse at the ceaseless procession of humanity, who can say?
8777I smell spring afar off--sniff-- do you?
8777If not, in what paper?
8777In one of Longfellow''s notes he alludes humorously to the autograph nuisance:--"Do you know how to apply properly for autographs?
8777Is it better?...
8777Isaacs''?"
8777It seems to me that is a little too early for Boston, is n''t it?
8777MY DEAR MR. FIELDS,--_Can_ you tell me anything that will get this horrible old woman of the C---- California off from my shoulders?
8777My dear, you are engaged and pledged in a year or two to encounter a similar fate, and do you wish to know how you shall feel?
8777Of his grace of manner, what could be more expressive than the following notes of compliment and acknowledgment?
8777One day the child looked earnestly at the long rows of books in the library, and at length said:--"Have you got''Jack the Giant- Killer''?"
8777Shall you want it?
8777She was one of those ladies of Edinburgh, he said,"who could turn to me, as she did, and say,''Whom would you like to meet?''
8777Speaking of one of the young women who grew up under her eye, she often said:"What could I do in this world without Mine Burntssen?
8777Talking of Victor Hugo and Lamartine,''Take them for all in all, which do you prefer?''
8777Tea came, and the sun went down, and still he talked and questioned, and then, after a long silence, he said suddenly:"What''s he doing now?
8777Was it Lucy Larcom?
8777Was the fault mine?
8777We ourselves are but poor slaves still in Italy: you feel for us; will you keep this gem as a slight recognition of what you have done?"
8777What did he mean?
8777What did the old Pilgrims mean by coming here?"
8777What is the dear Doctor doing?
8777What shall I do?
8777What think you of the enclosed instead of the sad ending of''The Ship''?
8777Whence came their color?
8777Who besides the writer should comprehend every shade of meaning which made the cloud or sunshine of his poem?
8777Who wrote''A Loyal Woman''s No?''
8777Whom would you like to see?''
8777Why could n''t we have been satisfied with the thing without making such a cackling over it?
8777Why deny, then, that some men have it more directly and more visibly than others?"
8777Why do n''t you make a book as big as Allibone''s out of your store of unparalleled personal recollections?
8777Why had I found no words to express or even indicate the feeling that had choked me?
8777Why should we not always do it when we write letters?
8777Will there be anybody in town then?
8777Will you do it yourself?"
8777_ Are you quite as quick of hearing?_ Please to say that once again.
8777_ Do n''t I use plain words, your Reverence?_ Yes, I often use a cane."
8777_ How_ is she?
8777_ What_ is she?
8777_ Where_ is she?
8777was asked immediately in the first pause, and"What did he say?"
8777who is this?
12700But when we come to inquire Whence is matter? 12700 Can he answer these questions?
12700Canst thou by searching find out God? 12700 How can the man who has learned but one art procure all the conveniences of life honestly?
12700Oh, what is Heaven but the fellowship Of minds that each can stand against the world By its own meek and incorruptible will?
12700Physician art thou, one all eyes; Philosopher, a fingering slave, One that would peep and botanize Upon his mother''s grave?
12700Scorn triflescomes from Aunt Mary Moody Emerson, and reappears in her nephew, Ralph Waldo.--"What right have you, Sir, to your virtue?
12700Shall I tell you the secret of the true scholar? 12700 Shall we judge a country by the majority, or by the minority?
12700What is the remedy? 12700 What?"
12700Who has a part with**** at this next exhibition?
12700Why call him_ the Post_?
12700Why then goest thou as some Boswell or literary worshipper to this saint or to that? 12700 ''How long?'' 12700 ''What is this truth you seek? 12700 ''What will you do, then?'' 12700 ***** What was the errand on which he visited our earth,--the message with which he came commissioned from the Infinite source of all life? 12700 *****Let us then ponder his words:--''Wilt thou not ope thy heart to know What rainbows teach and sunsets show?
12700--Of these three questions, What is matter?
12700A hundred and forty?"
12700A little while afterwards he asked of his fellow- traveller, Professor Thayer,"How much did I weigh?
12700After reading what Emerson says about"the masses,"one is tempted to ask whether a philosopher can ever have"a constituency"and be elected to Congress?
12700And how could prose go on all- fours more unmetrically than this?
12700And what shall we do with Pope''s"Essay on Man,"which has furnished more familiar lines than"Paradise Lost"and"Paradise Regained"both together?
12700And will you stop in England, and bring home the author of"Counterparts"with you?
12700Are my friends bent on killing me with kindness?
12700But what is the gift of a mourning ring to the bequest of a perpetual annuity?
12700But what shall we say to the"Ars Poetica"of Horace?
12700But what would youth be without its extravagances,--its preterpluperfect in the shape of adjectives, its unmeasured and unstinted admiration?
12700Can any ear reconcile itself to the last of these three lines of Emerson''s?
12700Can he dispose of them?
12700Can we find any trace of this idea elsewhere?
12700Can you help any soul_?
12700Can you obtain what you wish?
12700Can you see tendency in your life?
12700Canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection?"
12700Do all the women have bad noses and bad mouths?
12700Does this sound wild and extravagant?
12700Genius has given you the freedom of the universe, why then come within any walls?
12700Have you eyes to find the five Which five hundred did survive?"
12700Have you read Sampson Reed''s"Growth of the Mind"?
12700How could the man in whose thought such a meteoric expression suddenly announced itself fail to recognize it as divine?
12700How could they have got on together?
12700How d''ye do?
12700How d''ye do?
12700Is it too late now?
12700Is not the inaudible, inward laughter of Emerson more refreshing than the explosions of our noisiest humorists?
12700Is not this to make vain the gift of God?
12700Is not this to turn back the hand on the dial?"
12700Is there method in your consciousness?
12700Is virtue piecemeal?
12700Is''t not like That devil- spider that devours her mate Scarce freed from her embraces?"
12700One was tempted to ask:"What forlorn hope have you led?
12700Or did----write the novels and send them to London, as I fancied when I read them?
12700Shall we not bid him come, and be Poet and Teacher of a most scattered flock wanting a shepherd?
12700Shall we rank Emerson among the great poets or not?
12700The breeze says to us in its own language, How d''ye do?
12700The clouds are rich and dark, the air serene,_ So like the soul of me, what if''t were me_?"
12700The eye does not bring landscapes into the world on its retina,--why should the brain bring thoughts?
12700The translations excited me much, and who can estimate the value of a good thought?
12700The"Rhodora,"another brief poem, finds itself foreshadowed in the inquiry,"What is Beauty?"
12700They seemed to me to betray the richest invention, so rich as almost to say, why draw any line since you can draw all?
12700Transcendentalism has its occasional vagaries( what school has not?
12700Was he thinking of his relations with Carlyle?
12700We do not want his fragments to be made wholes,--if we did, what hand could be found equal to the task?
12700What am I?
12700What are Olympiads and Consulates to these neighboring systems of being?
12700What can promise more than an Essay by Emerson on"Immortality"?
12700What do you?
12700What does Rome know of rat and lizard?
12700What great discovery have you made?
12700What harm doth it?"
12700What has Emerson to tell us of"Inspiration?"
12700What heroic task of any kind have you performed?"
12700What immortal book have you written?
12700What is Beauty?
12700What is a farm but a mute gospel?"
12700What is the definite belief of Emerson as expressed in this discourse,--what does it mean?
12700What is the use of going about and setting up a flag of negation?''"
12700What is this beauty?''
12700What is this"genial atmosphere"but the very spirit of Christianity?
12700What man could speak more fitly, with more authority of"Character,"than Emerson?
12700What man was he who would lay his hand familiarly upon his shoulder and call him Waldo?
12700What would it avail to tell you anecdotes of a sweet and wonderful boy, such as we solace and sadden ourselves with at home every morning and evening?
12700When we come to the application, in the same Essay, almost on the same page, what can we make of such discourse as this?
12700Whence is it?
12700Where then did Goethe find his lovers?
12700Where to?
12700Who can give better counsels on"Culture"than Emerson?
12700Who is the owner?
12700Why have you not told me that we thought alike?
12700Why should I cumber myself with regrets that the receiver is not capacious?
12700Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe?
12700Why should not we have a poetry and philosophy of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us, and not the history of theirs?"
12700Why should you renounce your right to traverse the starlit deserts of truth, for the premature comforts of an acre, house, and barn?
12700Will no_ Angel_ body himself out of that; no stalwart Yankee_ man_, with color in the cheeks of him and a coat on his back?"
12700Wordsworth''s"Ode"is a noble and beautiful dream; is it anything more?
12700You are quite welcome to the lines"To the Rhodora;"but I think they need the superscription["Lines on being asked''Whence is the Flower?''"].
12700_ New England Reformers_.--Would any one venture to guess how Emerson would treat this subject?
12700and Whereto?
12700and we have already taken our hats off and are answering it with our own How d''ye do?
12700has my stove and pepper- pot a false bottom?
12700or"Out of what great picture have these pieces been cut?"
12700the old mystery remains, If I am I; thou, thou, or thou art I?"
13660Dost know me, friend? 13660 Has not Mr. Carey paid you?"
13660Old Fogeyand"Amiable Kuss"?
13660Then has he not paid Carlyle directly?
13660* A small hatchet- faced, gray- eyed, good- humored Inspector, who came with a Translated Lafontaine; and took his survey not without satisfaction?
13660** Cromwell-- Cromwell?
13660--------- And how many were"printed,"thinks Mr. Phillips?
13660--------- Did you receive a Dumfries Newspaper with a criticism in it?
13660---------- And poor Miss Fuller, was there any_ Life_ ever published of her?
13660All people are in a sort of joy- dom over the new French Republic, which has descended suddenly( or shall we say,_ ascended_ alas?)
13660And if so, I should say, Why not come at once, even as the Editor surmises?
13660And who knows but I may come one day?
13660And you ought to come and look at it, beyond doubt; and say to this land,"Old Mother, how are you getting on at all?"
13660Are English of this day incapable of a great sentiment?
13660Are you a physician, and will you come?
13660Are you bound by your Arabian bounty to a largess whenever you think of your friend?
13660But I hope you are to be at home tomorrow, for if I prosper, I shall come and beg a dinner with you,--is it not at five o''clock?
13660But he is a good man, and, do you know it?
13660But since you are all bounty and care for me, where are the new volumes of the Library Edition of Carlyle?
13660But there is no more time in this late night-- and what need?
13660But what can I?
13660But what can be said?
13660But what do I read in our Boston Newspapers twice in the last three days?
13660But what had I, dear wise man, to tell you?
13660By some refraction which new lenses or else steamships shall operate, shall I not yet one day see again the disk of benign Phosphorus?
13660By the bye, do you know a"Massachusetts Historical Society,"and a James Bowdoin, seemingly of Boston?
13660Can I ever forget, or think otherwise than lovingly of the man Emerson?
13660Can you remember and tell me?
13660Carlyle to Emerson Chelsea, 8 July, 1851 Dear Emerson,--Don''t you still remember very well that there is such a man?
13660Clark( is not that the name?)
13660Did you find kings and priests?
13660Did you mean to show us that you could not be old, but immortally young?
13660Do not I very well understand all that you say about"apathized moods,"& c.?
13660Do you bethink you of Craigenputtock, and the still evening there?
13660Do you know Beriah Green?
13660Do you know Browning at all?
13660Emerson to Carlyle* Concord, May[?
13660Enough, enough; there will be all Eternity to rest in, as Arnauld said:"Why in such a fuss, little sir?"
13660Ever yours, T. Carlyle We returned from Hampshire exactly a week ago; never passed six so totally idle weeks in our lives.--Better in health a little?
13660For example, you must tell Mr. Thoreau( is that the exact name?
13660For the years that remain, I suppose we must continue to grumble out some occasional utterance of that kind: what can we do, at this late stage?
13660From Mr. Everett I learn that your Boston Lectures have been attended with renown enough: when are the Lectures themselves to get to print?
13660Had I kept silence so very long?
13660Hammond l''Estrange says,"Who ever heard of a stammering man that was a fool?"
13660Has your head grown grayish?
13660Have I not a Friend, and Friends, though they too are in sorrow?
13660Have you a physician that can?
13660Have you got proper_ spectacles_ for your eyes?
13660He is abstruse, but worth knowing.--And what of the_ Discourse on England_ by a certain man?
13660He was even a little stern on his nearest relatives when they came to him: Do I need your help to die?
13660How can you explain men to Apes by the Dead Sea?
13660How shall Queen Victoria read this?
13660I fear you wo n''t see Brigham Young, however?
13660I know not what your engagements are; but I say to myself, Why not come at once, and rest a little from your sea- changes, before going farther?
13660I shall think there, a fortnight might bring you from London to Walden Pond.--Life wears on, and do you say the gray hairs appear?
13660In fact I felt punished;--and who knows, if the case were seen into, whether I deserve it?
13660In short, I am willing, I am willing; and so let us not waste another drop of ink on it at present!--On the whole, are not you a strange fellow?
13660Is Frederic recreated?
13660Is Frederic the Great?
13660Is it likely we shall meet in"Oregon,"think you?
13660Is not Henry James in London?
13660Is not this the most illustrious of all"ages"; making progress of the species at a grand rate indeed?
13660It is said: here, that you work upon Frederick the Great??
13660It is said: here, that you work upon Frederick the Great??
13660Macaulay''s_ History_ is also out, running through the fourth edition: did I tell you last time that I had read it,--with wonder and amazement?
13660Meanwhile, patience; for us there is nothing else appointed.--Tell me, however, what has become of your Book on England?
13660Never dream of such a thing nay, whom_ did_ you send?
13660Now please to read these things to the wise and kind ears of Jane Carlyle, and ask her if I have done wrong in giving my friend a letter to her?
13660Or is the case already irremediable?
13660Or possibly I do the poor man wrong by misremembrance?
13660Regrets for old days.--Not left town.--A new top story.--Miss Bacon, her Quixotic enterprise.--Clough.--Thackeray.--To Concord?
13660Shall I believe you, this time?
13660Tell me what is become of_ Frederic,_ for whose appearance I have watched every week for months?
13660The common impious vulgar of this earth, what has it to do with my life or me?
13660The man looks brilliant and noble to me; but how_ love_ him, or the sad wreck he lived and worked in?
13660This is the fact: what more can I say?
13660This war has been conducted over the heads of all the actors in it; and the foolish terrors,"What shall we do with the negro?"
13660To which the Mother will answer,"Thankee, young son, and you?"
13660Very well: could I help it?
13660Was I not once promised a visit?
13660Watchman, what sayest thou, then?
13660What are you doing?
13660What can I tell you better?
13660What do I care for his fame?
13660What have we to do with old age?
13660What news of Naseby and Worcester?
13660What to tell you of my coop and byre?
13660What would I not give for a head of Shakespeare by the same artist?
13660What, you scorn all this?
13660When shall I show him to you?
13660Where all writing is such a caricature of the subject, what signifies whether the form is a little more or less ornate and luxurious?
13660Who can say what he yet is and will be to me?
13660Who is he that can trust himself in the fray?
13660Who knows but I may have adventures-- I who had never one, as I have just had occasion to write to Mrs. Howitt, who inquired what mine were?
13660Why should I plague poor Clark with them, if it be any plague to him?
13660Why should I regret that I see you not, when you are forced thus intimately to discover yourself beyond the intimacy of conversation?
13660Will this do?
13660Will you come in Winter then, next Winter,--or when?
13660Will your next Letter tell us the_ when?_ O my Friend!
13660You are sending me a book, and Chapman''s Homer it is?
13660You promise us a new Book soon?
13660You remember Charles Buller, to whom I brought you over that night at the Barings''in Stanhope Street?
13660You say not a word of your own affairs: I have vaguely been taught to look for some Book shortly;--what of it?
13660_ Ach Gott!_ Is not Anarchy, and parliamentary eloquence instead of work, continued for half a century everywhere, a beautiful piece of business?
13660_ Altum Silentium,_ what else can I reply to it at present?
13660and having kept us all murmuring at your satires and sharp homilies, will now melt us with this manly and heart- warming embrace?
13660and how the poor?
13660how the Colleges?
13660how the Lords?
13660how the Primate and Bishops of England?
13660how the rich?
13660of Demosthenes?
13660of Plato?
13660or is any competent hand engaged on it?
13660this with the announcement of the Title as given above?
13660why he does not_ give_ us that little Book on England he has promised so long?
13583Mes enfans,said a French gentleman to the cherubs in the Picture,"Mes enfans, asseyez- vous?"
13583What care I for the house? 13583 Why?
13583( Did you get those two Newspapers?)
13583* How do you like it?
13583* Shall I say then,"In the mouth of two witnesses"?
13583----------_"Forgotten you?
13583--R. Waldo Emerson May I trouble you with a commission when you are in the City?
13583A cassock?
13583A sore calamity has fallen on us, or rather has fallen on my poor Wife( for what am I but like a spectator in comparison?
13583A_ disjectum membrum;_ cut off from relations with men?
13583After all, why should not Letters be on business too?
13583All the world cries out, Why_ do you_ publish with Fraser?
13583Always excepting my wonderful Professor, who among the living has thrown any memorable truths into circulation?
13583And can not you renew and confirm your suggestion touching your appearance in this continent?
13583And must not we say that Drunkenness is a virtue rather than that Cato has erred?
13583And now the Heterodox, the Heterodox, where is that?
13583And now why do not_ you_ write to me?
13583And now will you not tell me what you read and write?
13583And see Miss Martineau in the last_ Westminster Review:_--these things you are old enough to stand?
13583And then, How?
13583And what more can a man ask of his writing fellow- man?
13583And yet did ever wise and philanthropic author use so defying a diction?
13583And yet, as you will say, why not even of dollars?
13583Are all these things interesting to you?
13583As you know my whereabout, will you throw a little light on your own?
13583But after all, will it suit America to print an_ unequal_ number of your two pairs of volumes?
13583But has literature any parallel to the oddity of the vehicle chosen to convey this treasure?
13583But now first as to this question, What I mean?
13583But on the whole are we not the_ formalest_ people ever created under this Sun?
13583But the way to find that word?
13583But then where?
13583But what avail any commendations of the form, until I know that the man is alive and well?
13583But what makes the priest?
13583By the by, have you not learned to read German now?
13583By the bye, will you tell me some time or other in_ what_ American funds it is that your funded money, you once gave me note of, now lies?
13583Can they not see the necessity of your coming to look after your American interests?
13583Can you have the generosity to write,_ without_ an answer?
13583Can you not have some_ Sartors_ sent?
13583Can you tell me?
13583Carlyle to Emerson Chelsea, London, 13 April, 1839 My Dear Emerson,--Has anything gone wrong with you?
13583Could you send me two copies of the American_ Life of Schiller,_ if the thing is fit for making a present of, and easy to be got?
13583Could you send us out a part of your edition at American prices, and at the same time to your advantage?
13583Couldst not wait a little?
13583Did I tell you that we hope shortly to send you some American verses and prose of good intent?
13583Did he ever write to you?
13583Did the Upholsterer make this Universe?
13583Did you ever see such a vacant turnip- lantern as that Walsingham Goethe?
13583Did you not tell me, Mr. Thomas Carlyle, sitting upon one of your broad hills, that it was Jesus Christ built Dunscore Kirk yonder?
13583Do not the two together make one work?
13583Do you know English Puseyism?
13583Do you know what I think of doing with it?
13583Do you not believe that the fields and woods have their proper virtue, and that there are good and great things which will not be spoken in the city?
13583Do you read German or not?
13583Do you read Landor, or know him, O seeing man?
13583Do you remember Fraser''s Magazine for October, 1832, and a Translation there, with Notes, of a thing called Goethe''s Mahrchen?
13583Emerson What manner of person is Heraud?
13583Far, far better seems to me the unpopularity of this Philosophical Poem( shall I call it?)
13583Fear not that!--Do you attend at all to this new_ Laudism_ of ours?
13583For the sake of America will she not try the trip to Leith again?
13583For which last Evangel, the confirmation and rehabilitation of all other Evangels whatsoever, how can I be too grateful?
13583Gustave d''Eichthal( did you hear?)
13583Has the heterodoxy arrived in Chelsea, and quite destroyed us even in the charity of our friend?
13583Has the_ Meister_ ever arrived?
13583Have I involved you in double postage by this loquacity?
13583Have you received a letter from me with a pamphlet sent in December?
13583How can I speak of them on a miserable scrap of blue paper?
13583How do I know what is good for_ you,_ what authentically makes your own heart glad to work in it?
13583How is it that you do not write to me?
13583How should he be so poor?
13583I am getting on with some studies of mine prosperously for me, have got three essays nearly done, and who knows but in the autumn I shall have a book?
13583I am weary of hearing it said,"We love the Americans,""We wish well,"& c.,& c. What in God''s name should we do else?
13583I ask constantly of all men whether life may not be poetic as well as stupid?
13583I declare, I am ashamed of my intolerance:--and yet you have ceased to be a Teacher of theirs, have you not?
13583I have seen some other Lions, and Lion''s-_providers;_ but consider them a worthless species.--When will you write, then?
13583I know not what he will make of it;-- perhaps wry faces at it?
13583I rejoice rather in my laziness; proving that I_ can_ sit.--But, after all, ought I not to be thankful?
13583I sometimes ask myself rather earnestly, What is the duty of a citizen?
13583I will not love them.--And yet, what am I saying?
13583If it be not His will,--then is it not better so?
13583If you in America wanted more also--?
13583In any case what signifies it much?
13583In this number what say you to the_ Elegy_ written by a youth who grew up in this town and lives near me,--Henry Thoreau?
13583Is he now a preacher?
13583Is it Cromwell still?
13583Is lecturing and noise the way to get at that?
13583Is not all that very morbid,--unworthy the children of Odin, not to speak of Luther, Knox, and the other Brave?
13583Is there, at bottom, in the world or out of it, anything one would like so well, with one''s whole heart_ well,_ as PEACE?
13583It seems then this Mahomet was not a quack?
13583John Sterling scolds and kisses it( as the manner of the man is), and concludes by inquiring, whether there is any procurable Likeness of Emerson?
13583Little and James Brown, 112 Washington St.), or is not this the right way?
13583May I not call it temporary?
13583Meanwhile, however, is it not pitiable?
13583Milnes did get your Letter: I told you?
13583More than one inquires of me, Has that Emerson of yours written nothing else?
13583My copy of the_ Oration_ has never come: how is this?
13583Norton* surely is a chimera; but what has the whole business they are jarring about become?
13583Now, what does your question point at in reference to your new edition, asking"if we want more"?
13583Or are you perhaps writing a Book?
13583Or do you ever mean to learn it?
13583Or perhaps it is not a whit worse; only rougher, more substantial; on the whole better?
13583Or the power( and thence the call) to teach man''s duties as they flow from the Superhuman?
13583Or who knows but Mahomet may go to the mountain?
13583Patience;--and yet who can be patient?
13583People cry over it:"Whitherward?
13583Perhaps in some late number of the_ Zeitgenossen_ there may be something?
13583Probably, there is no chance before the middle of March or so?
13583Read the article_ Simonides_ by him in the_ London and Westminster_--brilliant prose, translations-- wooden?
13583Says not the sarcasm,"Truth hath the plague in his house"?
13583Shall it be Switzerland, shall it be Scotland, nay, shall it be America and Concord?
13583Shall we have anthracite coal or wood in your chamber?
13583Suppose you and I promulgate a treatise next,"How to see"?
13583Tell me of the author''s health and welfare; or, will not he love me so much as to write me a letter with his own hand?
13583Tell me whether you dislike it less; what you do think of it?
13583That he is a better Christian, with his"bastard Christianity,"than the most of us shovel- hatted?
13583That is the right way, is it not?
13583The Cat- Raphael?
13583The Printer is slack and lazy as Printers are; and you do not wish to write till you can send some news of him?
13583The cost of a copy in sheets or"folded"( if that means somewhat more?)
13583The second volume was just closing; shall it live for a third year?
13583The way to speak it when found?"
13583The"Lectures on the Times"are even now in progress?
13583Then again I think it is perhaps better so; who knows?
13583These voices of yours which I likened to unembodied souls, and censure sometimes for having no body,--how can they have a body?
13583They are delivering Orations about him, and emitting other kinds of froth,_ ut mos est._ What hurt can it do?
13583They are even of benefit?
13583They ask, What shall be done?
13583To fly in the teeth of English Puseyism, and risk such shrill welcome as I am pretty sure of, is questionable: yet at bottom why not?
13583To what use, surely?
13583Varnhagen himself will not bring up your fourth volume to the right size; hardly beyond 380 pages, I should think; yet what more can be done?
13583Very saucy, was it not?
13583Were you created by the Tailor?
13583What am I to do?
13583What can we say in these cases?
13583What could Homer, Socrates, or St. Paul say that can not be said here?
13583What does he at Clifton?
13583What has life better to offer than such tidings?
13583What have you to do with Italy?
13583What help, O James?
13583What is to hinder huge London from being to universal Saxondom what small Mycale was to the Tribes of Greece,--a place to hold your[ Greek] in?
13583What news, my dear friend, from your study?
13583What she is to write I know not, except it be what she has said, holding up the pamphlet,"Is it not a noble thing?
13583What would it avail to tell you anecdotes of a sweet and wonderful boy, such as we solace and sadden ourselves with at home every morning and evening?
13583What, What?"
13583When will you come and redeem your pledge?
13583Wherefore, putting all things together, can not I feel that I have washed my hands of this business in a quite tolerable manner?
13583Why may you not give the reins to your wit, your pathos, your philosophy, and become that good despot which the virtuous orator is?
13583Why not you come over, since I can not?
13583Why will not this_ Appendix_ do, these_ Appendixes,_ to hang to the skirts of Volume Four as well?
13583Will it ever reach him?
13583Will not that do?
13583Will this_ Appendix_ do, then?
13583Will you say to him that he sent me some books two or three years ago without any account of prices annexed?
13583Yet I work better under this base necessity, and then I have a certain delight( base also?)
13583Yet how is it that I do not hear?
13583Yet it was to fulfil my duty, finish my mission, not with much hope of gratifying him,--in the spirit of"If I love you, what is that to you?"
13583Yet perhaps it is the proper place after all, seeing all places are improper: who knows?
13583You can not believe it?
13583You of course read his sublime"article"?
13583You, friend Emerson, are to be a Farmer, you say, and dig Earth for your living?
13583_ Varnhagen_ may be printed I think without offence, since there is need of it: if that will make up your fourth volume to a due size, why not?
13583and WHEREFORE?
13583and_ Mirabeau_ and_ Macaulay?_ Stearns Wheeler is very faithful in his loving labor,--has taken a world of pains with the sweetest smile.
13583canst thou not make a pulpit by simply_ inverting the nearest tub?_"yet, alas!
13583he has to fly again.--Did you get his letter?
13583in the whole circle of History is there the parallel of that,--a true worship rising at this hour of the day for Bands and the Shovel- hat?
13583my horror of_ Lecturing_ continues great; and what else is there for me to do there?
13583or What is your American rule?
13583was it you that defalcated?
13583what designs ripened or executed?
13583what hopes?
13583what thoughts?