Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
26672A much debated question is, how far the decoration of a binding should be influenced by the contents of the book?
39075_ Shall books be sent to the bindery when in greatest demand?_ YES, when they can not be circulated further without permanent injury to them.
39318How did the name originate?
39318The question no longer is"How to prevent it?"
39318but the more far- reaching one:"How to face the fact?"
51522Is it possible to obtain a leather for bookbinding purposes as good and as durable as the leather produced from the 16th to 18th century?
51522Now to deal with the answer to the first question, Why do modern leather bindings decay?
51522Why do modern leather bindings decay?
55056Can the process be improved?"
55056What is the object of it?
55056What propriety is there in putting Scott, or Irving, or Dickens, or Longfellow, in such a dress?"
55056When performing a process, ask yourself the question,"Why is this done?
38387(_ b_) Is the book much read?
38387(_ b_) May not the library be better off without either the book or a substitute?
38387(_ d_) If the book is much used, is it a book that the library wishes to circulate?
38387(_ e_) If the book is not much read, is it a standard work?
38387(_ f_) Can the book be replaced with a good reprint which will wear as long as a new binding and cost less?
38387(_ g_) Is it an old edition, with poor paper and poor type?
38387(_ i_) Is the book used so seldom that it can be recased or recovered by the library?
38387A decision about new books which are popular is harder to make because it is fair to ask:(_ c_) Is the demand falling off?
38387And what librarian does not desire more money for new books?
38387CHAPTER XII PAMPHLETS Fortunately it is not necessary to decide here the ever- vexing question"When is a pamphlet not a pamphlet?"
38387Can a good foreman be employed?
38387In addition, however, it is sometimes necessary to ask the following:(_ a_) Are there later editions which are more valuable?
38387Is the local rate of wages so high as to make the cost of the binding in the library equal the cost in a good bindery outside the city?
38387Is there ample room in the building and is it easily adapted to binding purposes?
38387Is there in the same city a library bindery which does satisfactory work at reasonable prices, or must work be sent a long distance away?
38387When the book is finally worn out and must be withdrawn from circulation, the question always arises, must it be replaced with a new copy?
38387Which shall go at the top of the book, author or title?
38387Why should they be kept on the shelves when they are not used and ought not to be used?
38387Why, after a mistake has been made, refuse to admit it?
47456And is it not better economy to throw it away or sell it-- as it will probably never be wanted again-- than to spend money in binding it?
47456As to its binding lasting too long, why should the librarian concern himself about the shell after the kernel is eaten?
47456But, if kept for this purpose, does it need binding at all?
47456Consider these questions in regard to it: Is it worth repairing?
47456If not, has it not served its purpose and should it not be put away, rather than entail on the library another expense item in cost of binding?
47456If so, would not a new copy be a better investment than the rebinding of this one?
47456If so, would not the binding of it be a use of money far less justifiable than its original purchase?
47456If the paper is good enough for rebinding, will it stand mending and further wear without making its ultimate binding very difficult?
47456If there are other editions of this book obtainable, does this sample indicate that this particular edition is the best one to buy hereafter?
47456If they are, can the library spare this copy because the demand for this particular title is past?
47456If this is not the only copy of this book now in the library, are the other copies in good condition?
47456Is it on poor paper, so poor that in our style of rebinding it will last but a short time?
47456Many of them are rarely used; why rebind them at all, no matter how broken?
47456Or is it perhaps of interest now simply as a part of the history of fiction and so still worth keeping?
47456Shall it be put in morocco?
47456Should it be covered?
47456Should it be discarded?
47456Should it be rebound; or what should be done with it?
47456Should it be rebound?
47456That is to say, if it is bound, will it not stand idle on the shelf?
47456To the inquiry, does the method of rebinding which my library now employs give the best possible return for the money spent?
47456Will not a little mending make it hold together sufficiently well?
4489028.--Border of the_ Grandes Heures_ of Antony Verard: Paris, 1498(?).]
44890And who was this unknown designer, this painter of bold conceptions, whose work is complete in little nothings?
44890Another question presents itself: Did the old printers employ casting, or did they print directly from the wood block itself?
44890Are we to suppose, that duplicates of blocks passed between France and Germany, or was a copy made by a French designer?
44890But what can be said to- day of these people?
44890Had he completed it by applying to it the matrix and punch which had then and for centuries served the makers of seals and the money- coiners?
44890However, what had become of engraving by cutting in reverse, the figure in relief, from which printing could be done?
44890In other words, the block having been cut, did they make with it a mould into which melted metal could be poured to obtain a more resistant relief?
44890In the middle of this turmoil, what became of the obscure persons who were then the printers of the Bible?
44890Is it that they found there the descendants of Laurent Coster firmly established in their workshops?
44890It is beyond doubt that this master produced for many works figures and ornaments, but what were the books?
44890Must the coexistence, the simultaneous advance, of the invention in Germany and in the Low Countries be admitted?
44890Now in the situation in which Gutenberg found himself, in the face of his rivals, had he not some claim to regard the great discovery as his own?
44890This was true before, but after?
44890Was it John Gaensefleisch, called Gutenberg, or possibly John Fust?
44890Were not these engravers on wood printers themselves: the Commins, Guyot Marchants, Pierre Lecarrons, Jean Trepperels, and others?
44890What better proof could be wished of the communion of ideas and tastes between the two collectors?
44890When and where was this discovery produced?
44890Who was this John?
44890[ A] What would have become of this new process if the presses of Gutenberg had not brought their powerful assistance to the printing of engravings?