This is a table of type bigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.
bigram | frequency |
---|---|
older adults | 193 |
focus group | 174 |
health care | 145 |
social distancing | 135 |
one participant | 135 |
public health | 114 |
participants reported | 110 |
family members | 78 |
social media | 77 |
group participants | 71 |
focus groups | 70 |
united states | 69 |
older people | 66 |
mental health | 54 |
infection control | 52 |
i think | 51 |
systematic review | 51 |
participants described | 50 |
doc id | 49 |
school psychology | 49 |
cord uid | 49 |
data collection | 49 |
healthcare workers | 48 |
side effects | 47 |
participants also | 47 |
another participant | 46 |
respiratory syndrome | 44 |
chronic disease | 43 |
many participants | 43 |
peer support | 42 |
pandemic influenza | 42 |
controlled trial | 41 |
social support | 40 |
infection prevention | 40 |
world health | 39 |
research study | 37 |
design process | 36 |
infectious diseases | 36 |
least one | 36 |
health organization | 36 |
years old | 35 |
coronavirus disease | 35 |
informed consent | 35 |
research results | 35 |
care plan | 34 |
social isolation | 34 |
psychiatric genetics | 33 |
sample size | 33 |
later life | 33 |
participants indicated | 33 |
among older | 32 |
randomised controlled | 32 |
personal protective | 32 |
protective equipment | 32 |
social connectedness | 31 |
participant described | 31 |
local area | 31 |
granted medrxiv | 30 |
infectious disease | 30 |
copyright holder | 30 |
author funder | 30 |
made available | 30 |
moral reasoning | 30 |
instructors professors | 30 |
future research | 30 |
snap benefits | 29 |
hospital performance | 29 |
hand hygiene | 29 |
participants felt | 29 |
psychiatric disorders | 29 |
substance use | 29 |
acute respiratory | 29 |
african american | 28 |
international license | 28 |
qualitative research | 28 |
home care | 28 |
biological disasters | 28 |
people living | 28 |
ipc practices | 27 |
thematic analysis | 27 |
influenza pandemic | 27 |
older adult | 27 |
case reporting | 26 |
public awareness | 26 |
risk participants | 25 |
cognitive empathy | 25 |
technology use | 25 |
transcranial direct | 25 |
reference materials | 25 |
sodium hypochlorite | 25 |
control group | 25 |
disease control | 25 |
direct current | 25 |
novel coronavirus | 25 |
current stimulation | 25 |
severe acute | 25 |
several participants | 25 |
current study | 25 |
machine learning | 25 |
risk factors | 24 |
young people | 24 |
clinical practice | 24 |
test result | 24 |
present study | 24 |
medrxiv preprint | 24 |
participant stated | 24 |
genetic research | 24 |
strain sensors | 24 |
social lives | 23 |
case study | 23 |
qualitative data | 23 |
participants stated | 23 |
qualitative study | 23 |
deployment models | 23 |
declarative deployment | 23 |
school practices | 23 |
disaster response | 22 |
previous research | 22 |
disaster preparedness | 22 |
protective behaviors | 22 |
rpe score | 22 |
food insecurity | 22 |
participant explained | 22 |
participants expressed | 22 |
health literacy | 22 |
research team | 21 |
social connections | 21 |
black african | 21 |
care workers | 21 |
caregiver burden | 21 |
spinal cord | 21 |
previous studies | 21 |
hypochlorite bleach | 20 |
robotic pets | 20 |
statistically significant | 20 |
use technology | 20 |
participants noted | 20 |
hand washing | 20 |
stress reduction | 20 |
learning objectives | 20 |
content analysis | 20 |
study participants | 20 |
flexible textile | 20 |
weeks post | 20 |
resource allocation | 20 |
graduate students | 20 |
returning results | 19 |
table shows | 19 |
older women | 19 |
lower extremity | 19 |
robotic pet | 19 |
randomized controlled | 19 |
health conditions | 19 |
deployment model | 19 |
snap participants | 19 |
social interactions | 19 |
high risk | 19 |
online survey | 19 |
cohort study | 18 |
genetics researchers | 18 |
clinical setting | 18 |
cardiovascular disease | 18 |
adverse effects | 18 |
among participants | 18 |
also asked | 18 |
healthcare professionals | 18 |
higher levels | 18 |
informal caregivers | 18 |
best practices | 18 |
assistance program | 18 |
using technology | 18 |
increased risk | 18 |
random forest | 18 |
review board | 18 |
health professionals | 18 |
participants completed | 18 |
living alone | 18 |
interview data | 18 |
older patients | 18 |
incident command | 18 |
training program | 18 |
institutional review | 18 |
prolonged run | 18 |
participants received | 18 |
younger family | 18 |
assisted living | 17 |
nasal obstruction | 17 |
data analysis | 17 |
cord injury | 17 |
palliative care | 17 |
results related | 17 |
ethical issues | 17 |
general population | 17 |
participants identified | 17 |
social robots | 17 |
companion pet | 17 |
health risk | 17 |
hiv care | 17 |
future studies | 17 |
interview guide | 17 |
health system | 17 |
participant noted | 17 |
health outcomes | 17 |
clinical trials | 17 |
child health | 16 |
risk assessment | 16 |
participants discussed | 16 |
benefit disruption | 16 |
two participants | 16 |
ended questions | 16 |
attitudes toward | 16 |
training programs | 16 |
ethnically diverse | 16 |
adult caregivers | 16 |
biological events | 16 |
deployment automation | 16 |
lessons learned | 16 |
medical management | 16 |
care plans | 16 |
social networking | 16 |
research studies | 16 |
food security | 15 |
based stress | 15 |
nutrition assistance | 15 |
influenza vaccine | 15 |
health status | 15 |
pilot study | 15 |
small sample | 15 |
take care | 15 |
local deployment | 15 |
right place | 15 |
psychological distress | 15 |
major themes | 15 |
chronic diseases | 15 |
medically relevant | 15 |
male participant | 15 |
intergenerational relationships | 15 |
government shutdown | 15 |
potential participants | 15 |
participants believed | 15 |
local level | 15 |
new york | 15 |
one said | 15 |
one focus | 15 |
middle east | 15 |
behavioral health | 15 |
graduate school | 15 |
health research | 15 |
participants will | 14 |
back pain | 14 |
findings suggest | 14 |
schedule practices | 14 |
textile strain | 14 |
general public | 14 |
primary care | 14 |
east respiratory | 14 |
care strategies | 14 |
high levels | 14 |
prevention methods | 14 |
aged years | 14 |
human services | 14 |
three participants | 14 |
supplemental nutrition | 14 |
engineering design | 14 |
also reported | 14 |
lung cancer | 14 |
reasoning exercise | 14 |
preventive measures | 14 |
ethical considerations | 14 |
group members | 14 |
saudi arabia | 14 |
care coordination | 14 |
will get | 14 |
leadership role | 14 |
hand shaking | 14 |
adult children | 14 |
perceived exertion | 14 |
heart disease | 14 |
study design | 13 |
distancing practices | 13 |
authors declare | 13 |
participant shared | 13 |
underlying health | 13 |
longitudinal research | 13 |
paact model | 13 |
physical activity | 13 |
negative affect | 13 |
botulinum toxin | 13 |
use among | 13 |
cultural differences | 13 |
low back | 13 |
participants may | 13 |
mobile app | 13 |
may also | 13 |
physical distancing | 13 |
research questions | 13 |
asked participants | 13 |
professional identity | 13 |
septal surgery | 13 |
missing data | 13 |
positive emotions | 13 |
themes emerged | 13 |
pandemic preparedness | 13 |
elementary schools | 13 |
snap benefit | 13 |
school closures | 13 |
musculoskeletal care | 13 |
blood pressure | 13 |
physical therapy | 13 |
i know | 13 |
benefit levels | 13 |
positive emotion | 12 |
participant reported | 12 |
group discussion | 12 |
perceived social | 12 |
stress disorder | 12 |
participant said | 12 |
less likely | 12 |
participants used | 12 |
participants reporting | 12 |
care intervention | 12 |
group method | 12 |
outcome measures | 12 |
outcome measure | 12 |
isolation measures | 12 |
mean age | 12 |
genetic algorithms | 12 |
knowledge score | 12 |
posttraumatic stress | 12 |
research question | 12 |
time spent | 12 |
ethics committee | 12 |
primary outcome | 12 |
health revival | 12 |
regional meetings | 12 |
participant characteristics | 12 |
coordination service | 12 |
influenza vaccination | 12 |
health issues | 12 |
details omitted | 12 |
rural areas | 12 |
per week | 12 |
based approach | 12 |
go back | 12 |
disease transmission | 12 |
participants included | 12 |
corona virus | 12 |
outpatient clinical | 12 |
social work | 12 |
willful ignorance | 12 |
social activities | 12 |
participant preferences | 12 |
sci pain | 12 |
i just | 12 |
blind reviewing | 12 |
emergency department | 12 |
large number | 12 |
intersectional feminist | 12 |
eastern mediterranean | 12 |
racially ethnically | 12 |
approximately one | 12 |
usual care | 11 |
care professionals | 11 |
ethical challenges | 11 |
health information | 11 |
school closure | 11 |
participants experienced | 11 |
participants said | 11 |
digital technologies | 11 |
per day | 11 |
health services | 11 |
participant feedback | 11 |
younger generations | 11 |
avian influenza | 11 |
health sciences | 11 |
qaly maximization | 11 |
likert scale | 11 |
psychology training | 11 |
drug use | 11 |
present research | 11 |
preference scores | 11 |
breast cancer | 11 |
colorectal cancer | 11 |
women living | 11 |
physical health | 11 |
research participation | 11 |
severe covid | 11 |
health authorities | 11 |
distancing measures | 11 |
treatment effect | 11 |
mental disorders | 11 |
risk score | 11 |
healthcare system | 11 |
leadership development | 11 |
social services | 11 |
health coach | 11 |
application deployment | 11 |
i will | 11 |
social interaction | 11 |
internet access | 11 |
syndrome coronavirus | 11 |
feminist activism | 11 |
individual interviews | 11 |
command system | 11 |
control measures | 11 |
african countries | 11 |
qualitative interviews | 11 |
chronic conditions | 11 |
subjective loneliness | 11 |
think i | 11 |
qualitative content | 11 |
emergency preparedness | 11 |
better understand | 11 |
blood lactate | 11 |
social relationships | 11 |
latin american | 10 |
care providers | 10 |
infectious disasters | 10 |
additional information | 10 |
get tested | 10 |
first case | 10 |
first model | 10 |
versus yes | 10 |
first semester | 10 |
intervention group | 10 |
economic evaluation | 10 |
asian meeting | 10 |
level sci | 10 |
gender issues | 10 |
higher risk | 10 |
research participants | 10 |
health emergency | 10 |
preventative measures | 10 |
demographic characteristics | 10 |
companion pets | 10 |
disease risk | 10 |
many older | 10 |
share information | 10 |
even though | 10 |
also suggested | 10 |
second model | 10 |
nominal group | 10 |
trial will | 10 |
study procedures | 10 |
physical function | 10 |
participants considered | 10 |
caregiving responsibilities | 10 |
loved ones | 10 |
nasal septum | 10 |
interpersonal communication | 10 |
feasibility study | 10 |
health resource | 10 |
month period | 10 |
psychological impact | 10 |
factors affecting | 10 |
transcribed verbatim | 10 |
corresponding author | 10 |
faculty members | 10 |
dwelling older | 10 |
important factor | 10 |
mindfulness meditation | 10 |
fatigue level | 10 |
public preferences | 10 |
friendly cities | 10 |
human rights | 10 |
influenza preparedness | 10 |
clinical outcomes | 10 |
starting point | 10 |
younger adults | 10 |
blood cell | 10 |
neuropathic pain | 10 |
global health | 10 |
three months | 10 |
school day | 10 |
data saturation | 10 |
consent forms | 10 |
adverse events | 10 |
practice guidelines | 9 |
specific components | 9 |
statistics canada | 9 |
prospective cohort | 9 |
key ethical | 9 |
inclusion rate | 9 |
descriptive statistics | 9 |
daily living | 9 |
particularly important | 9 |
school week | 9 |
study population | 9 |
local community | 9 |
social policy | 9 |
gait training | 9 |
health department | 9 |
public engagement | 9 |
vast majority | 9 |
turbinate reduction | 9 |
care team | 9 |
inclusion criteria | 9 |
age groups | 9 |
pss leaders | 9 |
health problems | 9 |
national survey | 9 |
west england | 9 |
greatest concern | 9 |
virus disease | 9 |
data science | 9 |
religious leaders | 9 |
three minutes | 9 |
user interface | 9 |
care unit | 9 |
potential covid | 9 |
towards covid | 9 |
wearable sensors | 9 |
marital status | 9 |
word cloud | 9 |
high intensity | 9 |
local context | 9 |
private costs | 9 |
care pathway | 9 |
secondary schools | 9 |
medical records | 9 |
term home | 9 |
chronic health | 9 |
telemonitoring study | 9 |
social benefits | 9 |
total number | 9 |
standard deviation | 9 |
seasonal influenza | 9 |
i thought | 9 |
vaccine hesitancy | 9 |
feel comfortable | 9 |
political activism | 9 |
support services | 9 |
networking sites | 9 |
participants gave | 9 |
medical care | 9 |
i need | 9 |
also noted | 9 |
family member | 9 |
health systems | 9 |
group member | 9 |
five participants | 9 |
medical staff | 9 |
rural area | 9 |
two different | 9 |
rpe scale | 9 |
results suggest | 9 |
participants mentioned | 9 |
isolation wards | 9 |
past months | 9 |
return results | 8 |
borg rpe | 8 |
poor ipc | 8 |
one way | 8 |
representative sample | 8 |
intensive care | 8 |
surge capacity | 8 |
learning gains | 8 |
supportive care | 8 |
everyday life | 8 |
order queue | 8 |
reliable sources | 8 |
cancer mortality | 8 |
social connection | 8 |
also described | 8 |
months ago | 8 |
allocative preferences | 8 |
significant difference | 8 |
challenges related | 8 |
phone call | 8 |
ethics approval | 8 |
medical education | 8 |
instructor professor | 8 |
peer review | 8 |
international collaboration | 8 |
care behaviors | 8 |
nasal patency | 8 |
health benefits | 8 |
physical limitations | 8 |
pet ownership | 8 |
research project | 8 |
high level | 8 |
fit testing | 8 |
little bit | 8 |
face interactions | 8 |
disease outbreaks | 8 |
i feel | 8 |
retention strategies | 8 |
medical personnel | 8 |
may lead | 8 |
new technologies | 8 |
written informed | 8 |
respiratory protection | 8 |
published maps | 8 |
qualitative analysis | 8 |
coping strategies | 8 |
disaster planning | 8 |
automation technologies | 8 |
use disorders | 8 |
literature review | 8 |
daily life | 8 |
search algorithm | 8 |
gbmsm living | 8 |
important factors | 8 |
practice score | 8 |
design tools | 8 |
art adherence | 8 |
high costs | 8 |
nasal airway | 8 |
active learning | 8 |
severe illness | 8 |
used technology | 8 |
surgical mask | 8 |
take place | 8 |
south wales | 8 |
hiv infection | 8 |
ethical standards | 8 |
higher scores | 8 |
home exercise | 8 |
nature remains | 8 |
adults aged | 8 |
health humanities | 8 |
organizational application | 8 |
participating hcps | 8 |
first phase | 8 |
one third | 8 |
income countries | 8 |
different participants | 8 |
secondary outcomes | 8 |
vital signs | 8 |
results may | 8 |
will also | 8 |
mg dl | 8 |
recovery process | 8 |
safety net | 8 |
deployment workflow | 8 |
film discussion | 8 |
participants prior | 8 |
questions regarding | 8 |
care system | 8 |
social determinants | 8 |
overarching themes | 8 |
emerging infectious | 8 |
care costs | 8 |
commonly used | 8 |
recent years | 8 |
research ethics | 8 |
health departments | 8 |
care settings | 8 |
institutional affiliations | 8 |
cancer therapy | 8 |
chemotherapy dose | 8 |
jurisdictional claims | 8 |
month follow | 8 |
age range | 8 |
information sources | 8 |
longitudinal study | 8 |
medicare supplement | 8 |
measured using | 8 |
ebola virus | 8 |
stated preference | 8 |
proposed ivacs | 8 |
participants talked | 8 |
postoperative complications | 8 |
postpartum women | 8 |
treatment development | 8 |
ethical principles | 8 |
remains neutral | 8 |
new technology | 8 |
controlled trials | 8 |
digital technology | 8 |
school psychologists | 8 |
structured interviews | 8 |
data set | 8 |
interactive features | 8 |
i get | 8 |
social contact | 8 |
mean preference | 8 |
costless covid | 8 |
vulnerable populations | 8 |
current state | 8 |
media platforms | 8 |
individual participants | 8 |
two weeks | 8 |
alternative housing | 8 |
springer nature | 8 |
negative impact | 8 |
rpe scores | 8 |
clinically relevant | 8 |
disaster management | 8 |
socially isolated | 8 |
collected data | 8 |
i go | 8 |
mobile learning | 8 |
attitudes towards | 8 |
respondents agreed | 7 |
genetic algorithm | 7 |
exclusion criteria | 7 |
severe disease | 7 |
three main | 7 |
public values | 7 |
pharmaceutical interventions | 7 |
among people | 7 |
health insurance | 7 |
use case | 7 |
significantly associated | 7 |
among patients | 7 |
educational attainment | 7 |
main trial | 7 |
improve connections | 7 |
hospital infection | 7 |
orientation towards | 7 |
i said | 7 |
scarce resources | 7 |
note springer | 7 |
disease temperature | 7 |
augmented reality | 7 |
highly important | 7 |
patient care | 7 |
behavioural therapy | 7 |
allocative decisions | 7 |
lived experiences | 7 |
participants found | 7 |
senior doctors | 7 |
universal testing | 7 |
moral principles | 7 |
societal preferences | 7 |
influenza pandemics | 7 |
common codes | 7 |
ipc policies | 7 |
i believe | 7 |
i try | 7 |
health interventions | 7 |
genetics research | 7 |
practice guideline | 7 |
eight participants | 7 |
human resources | 7 |
interview transcripts | 7 |
cell lung | 7 |
widespread testing | 7 |
asked whether | 7 |
using social | 7 |
white blood | 7 |
current level | 7 |
mortality risk | 7 |
independent sample | 7 |
mental illness | 7 |
interview participants | 7 |
also used | 7 |
regression model | 7 |
altruistic orientation | 7 |
health officials | 7 |
isolation precautions | 7 |
participants whose | 7 |
test results | 7 |
three times | 7 |
grade level | 7 |
participants recommended | 7 |
coping mechanisms | 7 |
logistic regression | 7 |
research staff | 7 |
took place | 7 |
uk public | 7 |
internet use | 7 |
empathic accuracy | 7 |
relevant genetic | 7 |
health workers | 7 |
learning approach | 7 |
study information | 7 |
baseline severity | 7 |
immune system | 7 |
study research | 7 |
pandemic planning | 7 |
contracting covid | 7 |
personal experiences | 7 |
existential behavioural | 7 |
potential benefits | 7 |
alcohol consumption | 7 |
national institute | 7 |
data will | 7 |
participants shared | 7 |
diverse gbmsm | 7 |
hospital preparedness | 7 |
see table | 7 |
first time | 7 |
take part | 7 |
african meeting | 7 |
ng ml | 7 |
coping skills | 7 |
compassion meditation | 7 |
design processes | 7 |
subjectively lonely | 7 |
i mean | 7 |
numerical rating | 7 |
tdcs session | 7 |
disease outbreak | 7 |
i want | 7 |
participants agreed | 7 |
will take | 7 |
took part | 7 |
consent form | 7 |
decision making | 7 |
weight loss | 7 |
hospital incident | 7 |
optimisation algorithms | 7 |
customer service | 7 |
cell phone | 7 |
female participant | 7 |
federal government | 7 |
i got | 7 |
imperative deployment | 7 |
deviated septum | 7 |
among health | 7 |
detailed information | 7 |
simple rules | 7 |
interpersonal relationships | 7 |
higher education | 7 |
high mental | 7 |
research design | 7 |
urban areas | 7 |
baseline assessment | 7 |
perceived benefits | 7 |
red blood | 7 |
one theme | 7 |
ended question | 7 |
control participants | 7 |
surface disinfection | 7 |
bonta injections | 7 |
one group | 7 |
calfresh ebt | 7 |
care practices | 7 |
pain reduction | 7 |
design optimisation | 7 |
will help | 7 |
psychological impacts | 7 |
allostatic load | 7 |
deceased months | 7 |
first step | 7 |
cognitive impairment | 7 |
viral load | 7 |
sectional study | 7 |
inform future | 7 |
reactive protein | 7 |
influenza transmission | 7 |
recruit participants | 7 |
minor mental | 7 |
week follow | 7 |
prevention guidance | 7 |
reference category | 7 |
negative impacts | 7 |
strain sensor | 7 |
social networks | 7 |
identi ed | 7 |
six months | 7 |
aarp medicare | 7 |
process evaluation | 7 |
occupational health | 7 |
social functioning | 7 |
confidence interval | 7 |
priority setting | 7 |
prior experience | 7 |
clinical trial | 7 |
team members | 7 |
days per | 7 |
food stamps | 7 |
dose intensity | 7 |
bonta vs | 7 |
reported using | 7 |
versus medical | 7 |
participant responses | 7 |
risk reduction | 7 |
independent living | 7 |
cda grade | 7 |
may increase | 6 |
hip sensors | 6 |
mobile apps | 6 |
genetic results | 6 |
multiple times | 6 |
two groups | 6 |
taken together | 6 |
many people | 6 |
reasoning intervention | 6 |
rating scale | 6 |
one student | 6 |
adults may | 6 |
eligible participants | 6 |
support specialist | 6 |
biological emergencies | 6 |
anxiety disorder | 6 |
nairos trial | 6 |
deaths worldwide | 6 |
extremity kinematics | 6 |
high school | 6 |
much time | 6 |
care coordinator | 6 |
type wi | 6 |
every day | 6 |
least feasible | 6 |
educational materials | 6 |
research assistant | 6 |
friendly community | 6 |
reduced pain | 6 |
example quote | 6 |
use within | 6 |
phone number | 6 |
situation report | 6 |
may indicate | 6 |
ppe use | 6 |
among african | 6 |
snap program | 6 |
potential sars | 6 |
many focus | 6 |
protective actions | 6 |
difficult conversations | 6 |
awareness creation | 6 |
four focus | 6 |
solid tumors | 6 |
participants explained | 6 |
support specialists | 6 |
communicable diseases | 6 |
best practice | 6 |
public perceptions | 6 |
study participation | 6 |
genetic testing | 6 |
letter grade | 6 |
previous study | 6 |
may help | 6 |
last days | 6 |
biomechanical changes | 6 |
rapidly changing | 6 |
palliative patients | 6 |
social robot | 6 |
measures taken | 6 |
limited data | 6 |
score every | 6 |
group cohesion | 6 |
care provider | 6 |
subjective distress | 6 |
local social | 6 |
people will | 6 |
risk portfolio | 6 |
stroke rehabilitation | 6 |
participants using | 6 |
nursing home | 6 |
university campus | 6 |
constant comparison | 6 |
disease emergencies | 6 |
forest machine | 6 |
type diabetes | 6 |
study also | 6 |
education level | 6 |
risk management | 6 |
creative commons | 6 |
school reopening | 6 |
strongly agree | 6 |
field experience | 6 |
also found | 6 |
direct health | 6 |
financial support | 6 |
acute care | 6 |
biological disaster | 6 |
social distance | 6 |
health technology | 6 |
participants perceived | 6 |
genomic research | 6 |
perceived high | 6 |
different types | 6 |
patient safety | 6 |
cancer patients | 6 |
wolaita zone | 6 |
nasal septal | 6 |
several studies | 6 |
associated infections | 6 |
medical field | 6 |
deployment choreography | 6 |
study period | 6 |
social justice | 6 |
individual setting | 6 |
recess area | 6 |
proximate social | 6 |
deployment technologies | 6 |
providing care | 6 |
will need | 6 |
significantly higher | 6 |
indicating higher | 6 |
pandemic response | 6 |
dual relationships | 6 |
participants living | 6 |
digital devices | 6 |
decentralized cross | 6 |
health improvement | 6 |
mixed methods | 6 |
meaning units | 6 |
although participants | 6 |
staff will | 6 |
collaborative learning | 6 |
diverse sample | 6 |
senior consultants | 6 |
communication skills | 6 |
densely populated | 6 |
health risks | 6 |
one quarter | 6 |
alcohol use | 6 |
disease assessment | 6 |
medically actionable | 6 |
psychology graduate | 6 |
cooperative initiatives | 6 |
brain stimulation | 6 |
precautionary methods | 6 |
depressive symptoms | 6 |
one thing | 6 |
female participants | 6 |
regarding covid | 6 |
information sharing | 6 |
chronic condition | 6 |
low risk | 6 |
geographically proximate | 6 |
emergency management | 6 |
latin america | 6 |
response rate | 6 |
emergency response | 6 |
received chemotherapy | 6 |
ethical approval | 6 |
hospital discharge | 6 |
eating disorders | 6 |
mental burden | 6 |
app idea | 6 |
feel like | 6 |
hot drinks | 6 |
group discussions | 6 |
psychosocial impacts | 6 |
asa classification | 6 |
developed based | 6 |
every three | 6 |
privacy issues | 6 |
involving human | 6 |
nursing staff | 6 |
disease spread | 6 |
care pathways | 6 |
determine whether | 6 |
meditation practice | 6 |
online communities | 6 |
scores indicating | 6 |
hall movement | 6 |
musculoskeletal pain | 6 |
care needs | 6 |
knowledge questions | 6 |
moderately better | 6 |
home order | 6 |
significant challenge | 6 |
live alone | 6 |
immediate local | 6 |
time commitment | 6 |
identifying information | 6 |
allocated treatment | 6 |
healthy diet | 6 |
clinical settings | 6 |
initial idea | 6 |
randomized clinical | 6 |
study clinicians | 6 |
north carolina | 6 |
phone calls | 6 |
employee health | 6 |
practices towards | 6 |
questions related | 6 |
two separate | 6 |
care priority | 6 |
positive attitudes | 6 |
cell counts | 6 |
many aspects | 6 |
outcome test | 6 |
participants provided | 6 |
reasonable request | 6 |
relatively low | 6 |
qualitative inquiry | 6 |
common symptoms | 6 |
life events | 6 |
mobile devices | 6 |
next pandemic | 6 |
different groups | 6 |
perioperative telemonitoring | 6 |
surveillance system | 6 |
community members | 6 |
close contact | 6 |
clinical effectiveness | 6 |
via email | 6 |
short time | 6 |
personal hygiene | 6 |
learning algorithm | 6 |
current pandemic | 5 |
household income | 5 |
deployment engine | 5 |
information systems | 5 |
social movements | 5 |
new digital | 5 |
instant messaging | 5 |
repeat testing | 5 |
available online | 5 |
participants preferred | 5 |
healthcare workforce | 5 |
washing hands | 5 |
based intervention | 5 |
managing dual | 5 |
death unknown | 5 |
broad range | 5 |
daily activities | 5 |
participants chose | 5 |
mass index | 5 |
related barriers | 5 |
socially distance | 5 |
medical professionalism | 5 |
point likert | 5 |
disinfection frequency | 5 |
among individuals | 5 |
study prior | 5 |
field notes | 5 |
social conscience | 5 |
future pandemics | 5 |
make sure | 5 |
guided meditations | 5 |
alive beta | 5 |
challenges identified | 5 |
hurricane katrina | 5 |
health questionnaire | 5 |
belief model | 5 |
wide range | 5 |
also discussed | 5 |
researchers also | 5 |
lived experience | 5 |
pure qaly | 5 |
donning doffing | 5 |
worst pain | 5 |
based interventions | 5 |
care among | 5 |
somewhat better | 5 |
little research | 5 |
healthy older | 5 |
hiv aids | 5 |
data exchange | 5 |
personal health | 5 |
mutual aid | 5 |
strategic ignorance | 5 |
depth interviews | 5 |
hrp doctor | 5 |
ipc precautions | 5 |
care resources | 5 |
active control | 5 |
participants thought | 5 |
physical structure | 5 |
time payment | 5 |
younger people | 5 |
patient outcomes | 5 |
nonacute care | 5 |
frail older | 5 |
entire school | 5 |
nasal blockage | 5 |
survey link | 5 |
two researchers | 5 |
human participants | 5 |
research park | 5 |
training material | 5 |
good understanding | 5 |
clinical decision | 5 |
stuff like | 5 |
open access | 5 |
health economic | 5 |
increasingly common | 5 |
creating new | 5 |
recent study | 5 |
policy decisions | 5 |
ankle sensors | 5 |
strong professional | 5 |
social network | 5 |
interventions will | 5 |
reported feeling | 5 |
fatigue scale | 5 |
making contact | 5 |
daily lives | 5 |
materials needed | 5 |
entire application | 5 |
social life | 5 |
meeting participants | 5 |
nose score | 5 |
ten simple | 5 |
posted september | 5 |
doffing ppe | 5 |
incubation period | 5 |
medical school | 5 |
disease management | 5 |
level regressor | 5 |
injury pain | 5 |
individual genetic | 5 |
buy food | 5 |
external validity | 5 |
biologic triage | 5 |
educational topics | 5 |
maintaining social | 5 |
septal deviation | 5 |
public policy | 5 |
vaccine among | 5 |
hosting environment | 5 |
wearing ppe | 5 |
face contact | 5 |
term care | 5 |
average pain | 5 |
rpe levels | 5 |
overall survival | 5 |
four groups | 5 |
decision logic | 5 |
numerous studies | 5 |
sikeweyiya jewkes | 5 |
participants related | 5 |
information provided | 5 |
average number | 5 |
active lifestyles | 5 |
one example | 5 |
social values | 5 |
participants explaining | 5 |
limited resources | 5 |
teaching hospital | 5 |
social contacts | 5 |
primary purpose | 5 |
visible information | 5 |
patients will | 5 |
physical activities | 5 |
qualitative studies | 5 |
mobile applications | 5 |
final sample | 5 |
research committee | 5 |
canadian population | 5 |
tested prior | 5 |
old age | 5 |
risk based | 5 |
transactional model | 5 |
digital device | 5 |
urinary catheter | 5 |
equal allocation | 5 |
participants generally | 5 |
pain intensity | 5 |
graduate student | 5 |
four participants | 5 |
participants spoke | 5 |
life course | 5 |
home visits | 5 |
four themes | 5 |
best ways | 5 |
high degree | 5 |
high cost | 5 |
i heard | 5 |
chemotherapy treatment | 5 |
important role | 5 |
using qualitative | 5 |
sars outbreak | 5 |
better understanding | 5 |
data collected | 5 |
caregivers may | 5 |
local health | 5 |
optimisation process | 5 |
less feasible | 5 |
patients undergoing | 5 |
mobile technology | 5 |
taking part | 5 |
exhaustive run | 5 |
among veterans | 5 |
target market | 5 |
predicted values | 5 |
workshop participants | 5 |
procedural ethics | 5 |
reporting cases | 5 |
grassroots feminist | 5 |
care centers | 5 |
researchers believed | 5 |
version posted | 5 |
quintet recruitment | 5 |
mediterranean meeting | 5 |
whether participants | 5 |
six participants | 5 |
leaning forward | 5 |
needs related | 5 |
graduate education | 5 |
evolutionary algorithms | 5 |
testing process | 5 |
surveillance systems | 5 |
will include | 5 |
young children | 5 |
early days | 5 |
rare diseases | 5 |
also expressed | 5 |
across scenarios | 5 |
isolation centers | 5 |
strongest response | 5 |
using thematic | 5 |
group setting | 5 |
lasted approximately | 5 |
educational content | 5 |
people might | 5 |
studies show | 5 |
kinematic changes | 5 |
national stockpile | 5 |
experimental group | 5 |
junior doctors | 5 |
snowball sampling | 5 |
member stated | 5 |
recruitment intervention | 5 |
approximately half | 5 |
existing research | 5 |
nasal spray | 5 |
worth noting | 5 |
within days | 5 |
sars cov | 5 |
address gaps | 5 |
evidence base | 5 |
participants reflected | 5 |
moral deliberation | 5 |
mass casualty | 5 |
verbal communication | 5 |
online workshops | 5 |
southern ethiopia | 5 |
project management | 5 |
analysis approach | 5 |
reported positive | 5 |
body posture | 5 |
using mobile | 5 |
neural networks | 5 |
significantly different | 5 |
whether people | 5 |
health data | 5 |
ongoing process | 5 |
employer impact | 5 |
cultural perspectives | 5 |
interquartile range | 5 |
sample population | 5 |
effect sizes | 5 |
participant agreed | 5 |
induced myelosuppression | 5 |
based biomarkers | 5 |
impact negatively | 5 |
cloud applications | 5 |
workshop activities | 5 |
may need | 5 |
participants via | 5 |
four meetings | 5 |
focused coping | 5 |
person cohort | 5 |
hard time | 5 |
care engagement | 5 |
treatment within | 5 |
subcutaneous injection | 5 |
phone triage | 5 |
information regarding | 5 |
additional benefits | 5 |
taking responsibility | 5 |
hygiene compliance | 5 |
postoperative outcomes | 5 |
living arrangements | 5 |
seven participants | 5 |
via telephone | 5 |
social events | 5 |
study protocol | 5 |
preparedness among | 5 |
eligible patients | 5 |
amazon alexa | 5 |
linear mixed | 5 |
general health | 5 |
objective measures | 5 |
health disparities | 5 |
benefit issuance | 5 |
neither agree | 5 |
early detection | 5 |
challenges associated | 5 |
one chronic | 5 |
sitting together | 5 |
participant deployment | 5 |
study consisted | 5 |
patients receiving | 5 |
positive cases | 5 |
written reflections | 5 |
multiple participants | 5 |
small number | 5 |
small cell | 5 |
personal risk | 5 |
severe dyspnea | 5 |
design engineer | 5 |
qaly gains | 5 |
convenience sample | 5 |
risk factor | 5 |
cardiovascular mortality | 5 |
recruitment process | 5 |
older canadians | 5 |
frequently cited | 5 |
research methods | 5 |
crucial role | 5 |
associated icts | 5 |
eligibility criteria | 5 |
interviews will | 5 |
intervention session | 5 |
care services | 5 |
los angeles | 5 |
written consent | 5 |
younger participants | 5 |
input parameters | 5 |
things like | 5 |
cda risk | 5 |
see appendix | 5 |
transgender women | 5 |
data protection | 5 |
collect data | 5 |
among healthcare | 5 |
medical residents | 5 |
pilot randomized | 5 |
last session | 5 |
issues related | 5 |
preference survey | 5 |
others reported | 5 |
asian countries | 5 |
summary statistics | 5 |
health professions | 5 |
university students | 5 |
public gatherings | 5 |
health behaviors | 5 |
health consequences | 5 |
sharing information | 5 |
modifiable risk | 5 |
supplementary material | 5 |
unknown beta | 5 |
higher asa | 5 |
long time | 5 |
across age | 5 |
observational study | 5 |
health concerns | 5 |
mortality rates | 5 |
may provide | 5 |
vaccine development | 5 |
recruitment strategies | 5 |
lived alone | 5 |
facilitating social | 5 |
greater sense | 5 |
best way | 5 |
genetic risk | 5 |
statistical significance | 5 |
health coaching | 5 |
study date | 5 |
past disasters | 5 |
pregnant women | 5 |
negative emotional | 5 |
ago beta | 5 |
becomes available | 5 |
health complaints | 5 |
friendly communities | 5 |
current covid | 5 |
higher rates | 5 |
empathy app | 5 |
older persons | 5 |
critical care | 5 |
second theme | 5 |
past year | 5 |
black race | 5 |
health threats | 5 |
subjective burden | 5 |
overall goal | 5 |
positive outcomes | 5 |
disease prevention | 5 |
nan doi | 5 |
february benefits | 5 |
new connections | 5 |
effective factors | 5 |
group participant | 5 |
prospective study | 5 |
clinical skills | 5 |
natural disasters | 5 |
ideation workshop | 5 |
test positive | 5 |
experiencing significant | 5 |
body mass | 5 |
antiretroviral therapy | 5 |
provide support | 5 |
third parties | 5 |
risk pregnant | 5 |
human subjects | 5 |
statistical analyses | 5 |
healthcare costs | 5 |
future directions | 5 |
appropriate response | 5 |
management arm | 5 |
gender equality | 5 |
results indicate | 4 |
get information | 4 |
influenza virus | 4 |
root mean | 4 |
virus transmission | 4 |
trial design | 4 |
major impact | 4 |
health sector | 4 |
disease caused | 4 |
intervention procedures | 4 |
times per | 4 |
positive effect | 4 |
revival process | 4 |
difficulty accessing | 4 |
effective strategies | 4 |
coronary heart | 4 |
depth interview | 4 |
effective factor | 4 |
verbatim responses | 4 |
findings indicate | 4 |
close family | 4 |
media use | 4 |
reference value | 4 |
conflicting recommendations | 4 |
wellness programs | 4 |
potential benefit | 4 |
new ways | 4 |
assessed using | 4 |
positive test | 4 |
staff compliance | 4 |
technology assessment | 4 |
another theme | 4 |
using standard | 4 |
participants stressed | 4 |
international cooperation | 4 |
i went | 4 |
healthcare providers | 4 |
based wearable | 4 |
based guidelines | 4 |
high engagers | 4 |
also suggest | 4 |
guilford county | 4 |
national research | 4 |
deviated nasal | 4 |
testing will | 4 |
using nvivo | 4 |
care activities | 4 |
returning genetic | 4 |
data used | 4 |
i felt | 4 |
health education | 4 |
participant controls | 4 |
specific concerns | 4 |
optical motion | 4 |
effective approach | 4 |
care staff | 4 |
participant identified | 4 |
research indicates | 4 |
instrumented running | 4 |
analog scale | 4 |
help participants | 4 |
burden associated | 4 |
questions elicited | 4 |
reduce transmission | 4 |
identified issues | 4 |
injury risk | 4 |
qualitative description | 4 |
many described | 4 |
empty containers | 4 |
management group | 4 |
sexual assault | 4 |
five approaches | 4 |
get involved | 4 |
lonely older | 4 |
professional autonomy | 4 |
intensity training | 4 |
residential normalcy | 4 |
construction site | 4 |
raw meat | 4 |
analysis will | 4 |
technology design | 4 |
will explore | 4 |
information system | 4 |
agreement rating | 4 |
later amendments | 4 |
home support | 4 |
vulnerable population | 4 |
field trips | 4 |
biological weapons | 4 |
least weeks | 4 |
routine operations | 4 |
five months | 4 |
procedures performed | 4 |
spend time | 4 |
younger children | 4 |
awareness among | 4 |
conducted using | 4 |
negative emotions | 4 |
novel corona | 4 |
may result | 4 |
senior clinicians | 4 |
qualitative interview | 4 |
nursing homes | 4 |
hip pain | 4 |
perceived needs | 4 |
may explain | 4 |
i really | 4 |
scoping review | 4 |
method using | 4 |
patients hospitalized | 4 |
short period | 4 |
infected individuals | 4 |
educational level | 4 |
little information | 4 |
compassion fatigue | 4 |
people may | 4 |
healthcare research | 4 |
individual interview | 4 |
mometasone furoate | 4 |
large portion | 4 |
hand disinfection | 4 |
based guideline | 4 |
scattered around | 4 |
increased significantly | 4 |
needed support | 4 |
community settings | 4 |
one interpretation | 4 |
participants argued | 4 |
creating awareness | 4 |
preventing covid | 4 |
treatment options | 4 |
benefit formulas | 4 |
clinical autonomy | 4 |
shared concerns | 4 |
promotional channels | 4 |
textile wearable | 4 |
widely used | 4 |
role modelling | 4 |
group meeting | 4 |
emotional intelligence | 4 |
services agencies | 4 |
really hard | 4 |
biologic events | 4 |
work schedules | 4 |
overall health | 4 |
qualitative researchers | 4 |
class start | 4 |
mean score | 4 |
also contribute | 4 |
associated infection | 4 |
missing link | 4 |
elderly patients | 4 |
inferior turbinate | 4 |
values represent | 4 |
calorie restriction | 4 |
nv rhinospirometer | 4 |
risk communication | 4 |
also included | 4 |
one hand | 4 |
fasting glucose | 4 |
psychiatric symptoms | 4 |
medical director | 4 |
setup time | 4 |
growth factors | 4 |
internal validity | 4 |
task force | 4 |
isolation ward | 4 |
hazards approach | 4 |
adult child | 4 |
cancer care | 4 |
rating scales | 4 |
exploratory study | 4 |
motivating scenario | 4 |
assessment tool | 4 |
full control | 4 |
emotional health | 4 |
also agreed | 4 |
mild yellow | 4 |
public may | 4 |
extra money | 4 |
clinical studies | 4 |
vulnerable citizens | 4 |
amazon echo | 4 |
provide insight | 4 |
term outcomes | 4 |
research supports | 4 |
rpe level | 4 |
target sample | 4 |
objective burden | 4 |
global pandemic | 4 |
insulin resistance | 4 |
health issue | 4 |
large numbers | 4 |
day activities | 4 |
social engagement | 4 |
information flow | 4 |
may decrease | 4 |
also important | 4 |
care facility | 4 |
optimal length | 4 |
race ethnicity | 4 |
individuals will | 4 |
staff training | 4 |
categorical variables | 4 |
resources available | 4 |
various types | 4 |
elderly people | 4 |
selection bias | 4 |
patient reported | 4 |
retrospective analysis | 4 |
york times | 4 |
participants suggested | 4 |
fit tested | 4 |
participants showed | 4 |
time constraints | 4 |
technology might | 4 |
provide preliminary | 4 |
educational opportunities | 4 |
rapid review | 4 |
reference laboratories | 4 |
low engagers | 4 |
basic ipc | 4 |
subjects variance | 4 |
achieve herd | 4 |
contact isolation | 4 |
knowledge scores | 4 |
important part | 4 |
four regional | 4 |
modeling approach | 4 |
responsible return | 4 |
positive psychology | 4 |
participants linked | 4 |
allocative decision | 4 |
trial management | 4 |
red alert | 4 |
genetic counselors | 4 |
merriam tisdell | 4 |
health crisis | 4 |
also find | 4 |
others will | 4 |
common among | 4 |
care appointments | 4 |
based program | 4 |
pet use | 4 |
cultural factors | 4 |
one person | 4 |
health agencies | 4 |
myelosuppressive chemotherapy | 4 |
age group | 4 |
towards quarantine | 4 |
prior receipt | 4 |
stigmatizing people | 4 |
positive changes | 4 |
care facilities | 4 |
main findings | 4 |
government authorities | 4 |
working conditions | 4 |
unmet need | 4 |
previous years | 4 |
term effects | 4 |
early integration | 4 |
using strain | 4 |
method portion | 4 |
local communities | 4 |
last tdcs | 4 |
cancer chemotherapy | 4 |
participants feel | 4 |
participants seemed | 4 |
six domains | 4 |
societal values | 4 |
respiratory illness | 4 |
question answer | 4 |
including representatives | 4 |
increase social | 4 |
second phase | 4 |
key areas | 4 |
feasible approach | 4 |
divisional directors | 4 |
personal information | 4 |
live pet | 4 |
cancer incidence | 4 |
icps need | 4 |
us department | 4 |
seven themes | 4 |
environmental factors | 4 |
related information | 4 |
days later | 4 |
san francisco | 4 |
provide insights | 4 |
peak values | 4 |
times higher | 4 |
plwh may | 4 |
sure versus | 4 |
health effects | 4 |
contralateral turbinate | 4 |
optimal solution | 4 |
must continue | 4 |
tobacco use | 4 |
one episode | 4 |
will likely | 4 |
outcomes will | 4 |
dummy variable | 4 |
musculoskeletal complaints | 4 |
related issues | 4 |
skin penetration | 4 |
identify potential | 4 |
study aimed | 4 |
public transportation | 4 |
hospital managers | 4 |
taking medications | 4 |
vaccine uptake | 4 |
interview study | 4 |
increased sense | 4 |
generate ideas | 4 |
average frequency | 4 |
strides windows | 4 |
patient management | 4 |
instructor professors | 4 |
open trial | 4 |
online focus | 4 |
liver oil | 4 |
felt like | 4 |
chronic rhinosinusitis | 4 |
just one | 4 |
frontline doctors | 4 |
approach may | 4 |
costs associated | 4 |
categories included | 4 |
i never | 4 |
social environments | 4 |
blood disease | 4 |
food assistance | 4 |
participants disinfect | 4 |
primary analysis | 4 |
hiv viremia | 4 |
another person | 4 |
participants explicitly | 4 |
identified gender | 4 |
partial eta | 4 |
group study | 4 |
mean squared | 4 |
participant relation | 4 |
lactate concentration | 4 |
housing costs | 4 |
wet markets | 4 |
dose reductions | 4 |
participants based | 4 |
come back | 4 |
recess times | 4 |
globally visible | 4 |
social care | 4 |
participants acknowledged | 4 |
conducting research | 4 |
inflammatory markers | 4 |
design around | 4 |
research regarding | 4 |
physical touch | 4 |
studies using | 4 |
one limitation | 4 |
emergency departments | 4 |
participants knew | 4 |
broader society | 4 |
give consent | 4 |
various channels | 4 |
patients may | 4 |
selected based | 4 |
reported benefits | 4 |
participants practice | 4 |
adults experiencing | 4 |
antivaccine attitudes | 4 |
study presented | 4 |
blood cells | 4 |
research will | 4 |
significant psychiatric | 4 |
iv infusion | 4 |
positive impressions | 4 |
health due | 4 |
close proximity | 4 |
induced anemia | 4 |
choosing among | 4 |
med doi | 4 |
traumatic events | 4 |
extracted categories | 4 |
nationally representative | 4 |
studies involving | 4 |
lymphocyte ratio | 4 |
participants emphasized | 4 |
scarce health | 4 |
adverse health | 4 |
wearable devices | 4 |
income volatility | 4 |
maximum variation | 4 |
demographic data | 4 |
severe complications | 4 |
cloud providers | 4 |
related illness | 4 |
relevant findings | 4 |
training course | 4 |
chronic illness | 4 |
apic conference | 4 |
child development | 4 |
lower rates | 4 |
negatively correlated | 4 |
participants cited | 4 |
motor training | 4 |
central orchestrator | 4 |
qualitative approach | 4 |
stress levels | 4 |
small groups | 4 |
staff wear | 4 |
individual research | 4 |
local relationships | 4 |
school hours | 4 |
significantly older | 4 |
expressed concerns | 4 |
research suggests | 4 |
running tights | 4 |
potential barriers | 4 |
randomly selected | 4 |
using substances | 4 |
psychological impairment | 4 |
surgical intervention | 4 |
often used | 4 |
level spinal | 4 |
physician offices | 4 |
variation sampling | 4 |
information security | 4 |
herd immunity | 4 |
school settings | 4 |
parenting women | 4 |
public places | 4 |
social desirability | 4 |
final version | 4 |
extra features | 4 |
available support | 4 |
three groups | 4 |
carbohydrate intake | 4 |
eligible population | 4 |
social inclusion | 4 |
participants took | 4 |
temporally associated | 4 |
role models | 4 |
interventions may | 4 |
health policy | 4 |
health staff | 4 |
intersectional feminism | 4 |
sars epidemic | 4 |
female runners | 4 |
providing support | 4 |
prospective telemonitoring | 4 |
surgical arm | 4 |
future users | 4 |
i going | 4 |
meta model | 4 |
come together | 4 |
working group | 4 |
action plan | 4 |
events like | 4 |
hospital staff | 4 |
clinical population | 4 |
first level | 4 |
health impacts | 4 |
medication usage | 4 |
avoiding hand | 4 |
many studies | 4 |
optimisation problems | 4 |
future health | 4 |
cancer trials | 4 |
wider range | 4 |
additional benefit | 4 |
patient burden | 4 |
prior year | 4 |
university hospital | 4 |
around social | 4 |
adverse event | 4 |
pain interference | 4 |
following research | 4 |
response options | 4 |
vaccination coverage | 4 |
also experienced | 4 |
comparable ethical | 4 |
early mortality | 4 |
patient satisfaction | 4 |
mindfulness interventions | 4 |
emerging leaders | 4 |
increased genetic | 4 |
healthy fats | 4 |
care rationing | 4 |
practice recommendations | 4 |
care scenarios | 4 |
participants frequently | 4 |
factors associated | 4 |
unique challenges | 4 |
better use | 4 |
tested positive | 4 |
many years | 4 |
confusion among | 4 |
competing interests | 4 |
study entry | 4 |
reviewing details | 4 |
across organizational | 4 |
participant commented | 4 |
united kingdom | 4 |
future work | 4 |
eta squared | 4 |
based design | 4 |
health belief | 4 |
online supplementary | 4 |
quick reference | 4 |
green spaces | 4 |
treating psychiatrist | 4 |
insurance providers | 4 |
information sheet | 4 |
outcomes among | 4 |
topics identified | 4 |
reported receiving | 4 |
teach empathy | 4 |
motion capture | 4 |
see online | 4 |
digital illiteracy | 4 |
web application | 4 |
helsinki declaration | 4 |
social status | 4 |
git workshop | 4 |
cardiovascular events | 4 |
cod liver | 4 |
meditation exercises | 4 |
mindfulness practice | 4 |
recruitment locations | 4 |
additional participants | 4 |
motivating factor | 4 |
lower body | 4 |
average age | 4 |
previous findings | 4 |
negative perceptions | 4 |
septoplasty versus | 4 |
training modules | 4 |
many individuals | 4 |
separate cohorts | 4 |
consuming hot | 4 |
purchasing apps | 4 |
research updates | 4 |
kindness meditation | 4 |
visual analog | 4 |
depth understanding | 4 |
intensity exercise | 4 |
reported symptoms | 4 |
final coding | 4 |
study reported | 4 |
towards genetic | 4 |
effective communication | 4 |
ensure adequate | 4 |
conceptual framework | 4 |
healthcare policy | 4 |
got tested | 4 |
decision makers | 4 |
actively participate | 4 |
developed nations | 4 |
often female | 4 |
ambulatory care | 4 |
educational conference | 4 |
analyzed using | 4 |
participants rated | 4 |
requested supplies | 4 |
almost half | 4 |
socially disadvantaged | 4 |
health coaches | 4 |
casualty incidents | 4 |
specific local | 4 |
analysis using | 4 |
address return | 4 |
waste management | 4 |
communication channels | 4 |
get vaccinated | 4 |
professional development | 4 |
deployment modeling | 4 |
supporting social | 4 |
digital skills | 4 |
urban environments | 4 |
education topics | 4 |
even among | 4 |
previously reported | 4 |
habitually continue | 4 |
use sodium | 4 |
cortisol levels | 4 |
lead researcher | 4 |
treatment depression | 4 |
brain development | 4 |
substantial negative | 4 |
received bonta | 4 |
substance abuse | 4 |
previous work | 4 |
holy water | 4 |
nasal outcome | 4 |
free trial | 4 |
normative expectations | 4 |
remains unclear | 4 |
within months | 4 |
groups conducted | 4 |
body postures | 4 |
care worker | 4 |
response agencies | 4 |
based survey | 4 |
allocative preference | 4 |
qualitative evidence | 4 |
common reasons | 4 |
i learned | 4 |
extracted features | 4 |
one resident | 4 |
naturalistic inquiry | 4 |
site staff | 4 |
stress level | 4 |
world impact | 4 |
many countries | 4 |
feminist praxis | 4 |
deriving comfort | 4 |
many others | 4 |
survey data | 4 |
findings provide | 4 |
research sponsors | 4 |
among five | 4 |
people use | 4 |
strategic national | 4 |
study sites | 4 |
warmup exercise | 4 |
increased social | 4 |
rough estimation | 4 |
participant acceptability | 4 |
improve health | 4 |
minority status | 4 |
ebola outbreak | 4 |
health needs | 4 |
less active | 4 |
compassion training | 4 |
another said | 4 |
coronavirus pandemic | 4 |
chief investigator | 4 |
returning individual | 4 |
emerging pss | 4 |
elevated risk | 4 |
safety monitor | 4 |
live sessions | 4 |
low health | 4 |
i started | 4 |
great deal | 4 |
gait speed | 4 |
positive affect | 4 |
respiratory droplets | 4 |
upper body | 4 |
main themes | 4 |
nasal septoplasty | 4 |
online questionnaire | 4 |
prentiss dantzler | 4 |
past decade | 4 |
workers will | 4 |
work sick | 4 |
largest portion | 4 |
mean knowledge | 4 |
family caregivers | 4 |
experience seminar | 4 |
compassion toward | 4 |
routine clinical | 4 |
prior research | 4 |
countries will | 4 |
participant discussed | 4 |
statistical analysis | 4 |
annual educational | 4 |
desired state | 4 |
will seek | 4 |
participants receiving | 4 |
sample included | 4 |
mindfulness intervention | 4 |
toxin type | 4 |
clinically significant | 4 |
lower educational | 4 |
provide feedback | 4 |
improved health | 4 |
received tdcs | 4 |
organizational boundaries | 4 |
mindfulness program | 4 |
individual results | 4 |
highly correlated | 3 |
survey conducted | 3 |
structural analysis | 3 |
following quotes | 3 |
plos one | 3 |
third theme | 3 |
workshop survey | 3 |
another area | 3 |
via social | 3 |
using digital | 3 |
annual income | 3 |
generational distances | 3 |
second research | 3 |
health support | 3 |
grounded theory | 3 |
another way | 3 |
low cost | 3 |
among residents | 3 |
obtained information | 3 |
research findings | 3 |
data provided | 3 |
running shoes | 3 |
sampling technique | 3 |
professional relationships | 3 |
related social | 3 |
community spaces | 3 |
sud treatment | 3 |
nvivo software | 3 |
ivacs architecture | 3 |
isolated individuals | 3 |
sensitivity analyses | 3 |
cbrn events | 3 |
highly likely | 3 |
look like | 3 |
less supportive | 3 |
put forward | 3 |
cancer treatment | 3 |
raised multiple | 3 |
risk understanding | 3 |
cream vans | 3 |
higher knowledge | 3 |
international spinal | 3 |
state agencies | 3 |
accept vaccination | 3 |
design space | 3 |
declarative models | 3 |
help make | 3 |
disease emergency | 3 |
year study | 3 |
contagious patients | 3 |
audio recorded | 3 |
household size | 3 |
practice provides | 3 |
will almost | 3 |
study logistics | 3 |
spss statistics | 3 |
covid participants | 3 |
danish data | 3 |
anova statistics | 3 |
also sought | 3 |
nutritional deficiencies | 3 |
practice mindfulness | 3 |
add value | 3 |
commons attribution | 3 |
public discourse | 3 |
also wanted | 3 |
i use | 3 |
response time | 3 |
workflow models | 3 |
female recreational | 3 |
business owner | 3 |
feasible practices | 3 |
fixed benefits | 3 |
creating public | 3 |
fit test | 3 |
disorders treatment | 3 |
binomial logistic | 3 |
participants raised | 3 |
teach self | 3 |
treatment centre | 3 |
two thirds | 3 |
previously mentioned | 3 |
triage systems | 3 |
group met | 3 |
low engagement | 3 |
will come | 3 |
moderate side | 3 |
advisory committee | 3 |
discussed within | 3 |
disease among | 3 |
canceling assemblies | 3 |
experiential learning | 3 |
pss may | 3 |
participant reflected | 3 |
genetic information | 3 |
using machine | 3 |
provide important | 3 |
tertiary hospital | 3 |
analyses will | 3 |
ict use | 3 |
long intervention | 3 |
lack knowledge | 3 |
fake news | 3 |
hospital visits | 3 |
contact information | 3 |
internal medicine | 3 |
relative dose | 3 |
panel members | 3 |
county social | 3 |
airway management | 3 |
critical review | 3 |
health technologies | 3 |
take forward | 3 |
across groups | 3 |
ageist stereotypes | 3 |
theme involves | 3 |
two research | 3 |
provide benefit | 3 |
engager participants | 3 |
participants use | 3 |
group therapy | 3 |
may require | 3 |
risk category | 3 |
large share | 3 |
different cloud | 3 |
experience significant | 3 |
responding agencies | 3 |
care model | 3 |
seriously ill | 3 |
practices among | 3 |
exposure prophylaxis | 3 |
study used | 3 |
may prevent | 3 |
new friends | 3 |
infected air | 3 |
potential side | 3 |
chronic respiratory | 3 |
one time | 3 |
increasing benefit | 3 |
also identified | 3 |
important insights | 3 |
evd outbreak | 3 |
ask participants | 3 |
services research | 3 |
training load | 3 |
participants met | 3 |
aspects related | 3 |
healthcare settings | 3 |
problem solving | 3 |
mg day | 3 |
recreational runners | 3 |
study since | 3 |
will review | 3 |
access food | 3 |
significant differences | 3 |
progressive increase | 3 |
second level | 3 |
motor cortex | 3 |
social spaces | 3 |
graduate program | 3 |
exercise feels | 3 |
mixed messages | 3 |
reported outcomes | 3 |
sociodemographic characteristics | 3 |
showed symptoms | 3 |
claims data | 3 |
relieve suffering | 3 |
meditation may | 3 |
care interventions | 3 |
several important | 3 |
ipc rules | 3 |
following sections | 3 |
help us | 3 |
test situation | 3 |
individual rights | 3 |
received placebo | 3 |
particularly challenging | 3 |
measure changes | 3 |
hrp participants | 3 |
conspiracy theories | 3 |
atherogenic index | 3 |
additional work | 3 |
inform guidance | 3 |
related resource | 3 |
several strategies | 3 |
publicly supported | 3 |
performance improvement | 3 |
continuous variables | 3 |
underlying renal | 3 |
facilitate active | 3 |
pets may | 3 |
agency leaders | 3 |
support social | 3 |
emotional responses | 3 |
reported health | 3 |
ageing society | 3 |
based empathy | 3 |
adults use | 3 |
clinical experience | 3 |
debriefing session | 3 |
say anything | 3 |
trial findings | 3 |
i used | 3 |
dose modifications | 3 |
cohort experienced | 3 |
three key | 3 |
following recommendations | 3 |
screen visitors | 3 |
economic stability | 3 |
clinical ehealth | 3 |
raises concerns | 3 |
increasing number | 3 |
become familiar | 3 |
including improved | 3 |
biomarker panel | 3 |
resource use | 3 |
second week | 3 |
chili papers | 3 |
washing frequency | 3 |
user experience | 3 |
mapping assigns | 3 |
connectedness within | 3 |
completed questions | 3 |
oriented towards | 3 |
cdt labs | 3 |
one another | 3 |
responses indicating | 3 |
local activities | 3 |
survey participants | 3 |
least two | 3 |
moral development | 3 |
narrative philosophy | 3 |
one related | 3 |
directed toward | 3 |
higher degree | 3 |
genetic counselor | 3 |
brief overview | 3 |
dismissal times | 3 |
increased covid | 3 |
nobody knew | 3 |
use computers | 3 |
losing income | 3 |
equitable access | 3 |
personal lives | 3 |
monitoring committee | 3 |
teaching tool | 3 |
significantly differ | 3 |
primary objective | 3 |
identify common | 3 |
laboratory setting | 3 |
treatment intervention | 3 |
questionpro application | 3 |
informal care | 3 |
individual circumstances | 3 |
multiple biomarkers | 3 |
health maintenance | 3 |
behaviour change | 3 |
training clinicians | 3 |
active ageing | 3 |
mometasone nasal | 3 |
large australian | 3 |
commons licence | 3 |
might increase | 3 |
long distance | 3 |
clostridium difficile | 3 |
current qualitative | 3 |
technological barriers | 3 |
resident shared | 3 |
reported markedly | 3 |
mobile phone | 3 |
may choose | 3 |
timely access | 3 |
back positive | 3 |
caregiving experiences | 3 |
participants working | 3 |
information technology | 3 |
may yield | 3 |
deeper understanding | 3 |
early adopters | 3 |
brief depression | 3 |
ethics subcommittee | 3 |
specific routes | 3 |
randomized trial | 3 |
family relationships | 3 |
activities outside | 3 |
full life | 3 |
nasal endoscopy | 3 |
advocacy groups | 3 |
challenges like | 3 |
thriving stage | 3 |
practice may | 3 |
loss program | 3 |
pain questions | 3 |
false positives | 3 |
leaders may | 3 |
one half | 3 |
reducing disease | 3 |
two treatments | 3 |
cost per | 3 |
informal support | 3 |
transmitted via | 3 |
new strategies | 3 |
organization quality | 3 |
described using | 3 |
based review | 3 |
food items | 3 |
care management | 3 |
adding new | 3 |
may represent | 3 |
appropriate training | 3 |
basic needs | 3 |
health organizations | 3 |
outpatient sci | 3 |
traditional healers | 3 |
prerecorded sessions | 3 |
infected pneumonia | 3 |
study will | 3 |
meetings described | 3 |
research among | 3 |
exercise classes | 3 |
based training | 3 |
reported concerns | 3 |
government must | 3 |
employment status | 3 |
one investigator | 3 |
testing positive | 3 |
future pandemic | 3 |
recalled chemotherapy | 3 |
sensor signals | 3 |
first theme | 3 |
two themes | 3 |
favorite features | 3 |
colliding bodies | 3 |
technological connections | 3 |
knowledge creation | 3 |