The New Hume DebateIncludes new essays by renowned philosophers and Hume scholars such as Barry Stround, Simon Blackburn and Galen Strawson, this is the first book to discuss the whole debate about whether Hume was indeed a sceptic. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according argues argument ascribe Berkeley body causal powers causal realism cause and effect conceive conception conjoined constant conjunction Craig definite description definitions of cause depends discussion distinction Enquiry epistemic epistemological example existence experience explain external objects fact feeling Flage follows Galen Strawson Goodman Hume debate Hume says Hume writes Hume’s account Hume’s scepticism Hume’s theory Hume’s view Humean idea of necessary imagination inductive reasonings inductive scepticism inference intelligible interpretation of Hume kind knowledge Malebranche matter meaning metaphysical mind natural beliefs necessary connection necessary connexion necessity never notion objects specifically different observe occasionalists passage perceive perceptions philosophical positive idea possible powers and forces principle problem projectivism question reading of Hume reason refer regular succession regularity theory Reid relative idea resemblance sceptical realist seems sense Simon Blackburn straitjacket suggest suppose supposition theory of ideas theory of relative things thought Treatise Winkler Wittgenstein words Wright
Bibliographic information
| Title | The New Hume Debate |
| Editors | Rupert Read, Kenneth Richman |
| Publisher | Routledge, 2002 |
| ISBN | 1134555288, 9781134555284 |
| Length | 224 pages |
| Subjects | › › Philosophy / General Philosophy / History & Surveys / General Philosophy / Individual Philosophers |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |