Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
35760	Jesus had given to the Pharisees His views of marriage in answer to their question:"Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for_ every_ reason?"
35760	Once Mohammed inquired of a man if he was married, and being answered in the negative, he asked,"Art thou sound and healthy?"
35760	Then was put to Him the question concerning the existing law:"Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?"
37368	Has he then such a weapon?
37368	How many persons could be mentioned, a catalogue of whose unpublished writings would, during their lives or afterwards, command a ready sale?"
37368	Shall the courts thus close the front entrance to constituted authority, and open wide the back door to idle or prurient curiosity?
37368	What is the nature, the basis, of this right to prevent the publication of manuscripts or works of art?
37368	What is the thing which is protected?
37368	[ 21]"Assuming the law to be so, what is its foundation in this respect?
60300	A reprieve?
60300	If,he says,"I am seeking logical consistency, the symmetry of the legal structure, how far shall I seek it?
60300	Does the right of suffrage entitle women to serve as jurors?
60300	Governor, have you a copy that you can let me have?"
60300	It says of a new member:"What will happen to him when he takes his seat in the Senate?
60300	The real question is,''Does the conduct under existing facts amount to intimidation?''
59877	***** Mr. Hardfax:"So your son left us to go into a bank in the city?
59877	--_Vaudeville News._*****"Prisoner at the bar,"said the judge,"will you have trial by judge or jury?"
59877	After this question was asked the Court said:"Is that material?"
59877	How did he acquit himself?"
59877	Mr. O''Conor, when he was at liberty, would put on the back of his head the silk hat which he always wore and say:"Who''s for a walk?"
59877	What acts of petitioner constitute the election which should bar this New Jersey proceeding?
59877	Where, then, is the evidence of lack of good faith and failure to exercise reasonable discretion?
22910	Do you promise that you will deliver me such and such a slave, at such and such a place, on such and such a day?
22910	All this is easily understood by a modern; but who are the Agnates?
22910	But in what capacity did he acquire them?
22910	But there is still the question, Why did Primogeniture gradually supersede every other principle of succession?
22910	But what was the Family?
22910	But why?
22910	How came it to be a question whether invariable sequence was identical with necessary connection?
22910	How was authority so little definite reconciled with a settled condition of society and of law?
22910	I must confine myself to two questions: how far did Maine develop or modify in his subsequent writings the main thesis of_ Ancient Law_?
22910	The next question is, what is the nature of this union and the degree of intimacy which it involves?
22910	What then is meant by saying that the Slave was originally included in the Family?
22910	What then is the inference?
22910	What then is the reason of this arbitrary inclusion and exclusion?
22910	What then was involved in this nexum or bond?
22910	What was an Obligation?
22910	What was the exact point of contact between the old Jus Gentium and the Law of Nature?
22910	Why did this not occur in the feudal world?
22910	Why were they not successively included among the favoured objects of enjoyment?
22910	and how came it that the dead were allowed to control the posthumous disposition of their property?
22910	to what extent has this thesis stood the test of the criticism and research of others?
22910	to whom and in what form does it pass?
38589	Fines, for what?
38589	Is that all?
38589	It will be said, this Statute has been read Reversely in our sister England, where It is the Charter of proud Chanticleer; But what of that? 38589 What is this to the purpose?"
38589	You had as good say nothing,observed the Recorder, and the Lord Mayor added,"Was it not an unlawful assembly?
38589	And what of hares in coursing run to death?
38589	Are we to find Game Cocks, domestic fowls?
38589	Are we to hold that birds, are animals?
38589	As to the legal penalty of adultery, are we quite sure that, according to results, we have greatly improved upon the old Bible Law?
38589	But what, it was asked, should be done where a one- eyed man happened to put out one of his neighbour''s eyes?
38589	Does this not offer a fine comment on the grievous usury so cruelly enforced in after years by these people upon the_ Gentile_ races?
38589	Have you considered substantially the whole evidence as it was declared and recited?
38589	How again came it that a claim of feudal service might be departed from by the delivery and placing of a wand(_ virgula_) upon the altar?
38589	How came this singular procedure into Scottish practice?
38589	How much of this was suspicion substantiated by torture?
38589	Of quivering foxes torn by yelling hounds?
38589	Of wheeling pigeons slaughtered for a prize?
38589	One can understand why a sod should be so often a token, but why does the glove play so large a part in Merovingian and Carolingian conveyancing?
38589	Should he lose his only eye by way of retaliation?
38589	The Queen''s crown, the Judge''s ermine, the Mayor''s mace, what are they else?
38589	The question then arises,"On what grounds was this intercourse conducted?"
38589	Was it in Herrick''s mind when he penned his fine tribute to Selden?
38589	Was there some such boon in bonny Scotland?
38589	What does B do?
38589	What was to be done?
38589	Whose was the ring?
38589	Why for example amongst the Saxons should a resignation of all interest in an estate have been made by a gesture with curved fingers?
43945	Bowen, L. J., in the same case, says:"From where are you to collect the terms?
43945	But if the whole invention and design of the engraving is the engraver''s own do the Engraving Acts protect the engraver in such design and invention?
43945	Can it be lawful to do so because in addition to doing this they sent persons with the slips to ascertain their correctness?
43945	Did the artist receive good and valuable consideration?
43945	Does this include the colonies?
43945	If such action would have lain at common law, is it taken away by the statute of 8th Anne?
43945	Larger words and less restrained the legislature could scarcely have used, and on what sound principle are we to import a restraint by implication?"
43945	Must it be at the time of making or at the time of publishing, or both?
43945	Suppose an illuminated hand- made book, fifty copies put on the market, is that to be denied copyright?
43945	The question put by the law is, in its simplest form:"Is the alleged infringement an unauthorised copy of the whole or part of a copyright work?"
43945	The question, then, is, what are the classes of works the reproduction of which is to be restricted, or to be left unrestricted?
43945	Was the portrait taken for or on behalf of some person other than the artist?
43945	When then does a person"cause a dramatic piece to be represented"?
43945	Whether the author of any literary composition and his assigns had the sole right of printing and publishing the same in perpetuity by the common law?
43945	Whether this right is in any way impeached or taken away by the statute of 8th Anne?
43945	Will the American doctrine be adopted that it is against public policy that there should be any monopoly in them?
43945	Would a piece of sculpture be infringed by a picture, sketch, or engraving copying the design of the work?
43945	Would, for instance, the author of a book be also the author of illustrations which he had procured another to draw for him?
43945	[ 1445] CHAPTER III WHO IS THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT?
43945	_ Quà ¦ re_ does the provision in the Customs Act enlarge the protection by the words"printed or reprinted in any other country"?
43945	e._ unperformed dramatic pieces?
31504	Again, is it single or diverse in its nature?
31504	Are not they the reactionaries who, despite the lessons of history, would revert to the days of a dependent, recallable, and hence timid judiciary?
31504	Are there any attributes of justice of which we can speak so confidently as being necessary, inherent, and self- evident?
31504	But what is this justice, declared to be so great a virtue, so ineffable, so supremely important?
31504	But who is to determine the matter?
31504	Do nature, society, industry, politics, each have a different criterion?
31504	Do we know of any state of society in human or animal life at any time, past or present, of which the contrary of Plato''s statement is true?
31504	Do we know or can we know anything certain about justice?
31504	Does earlier history or later experience point to any better equipped, more stable, more safe tribunal?
31504	Even if society may strive to preserve the inefficient and improvident, should it do so by hampering and restraining those wiser and more capable?
31504	Finally, is it a reality or, as Falstaff said of honor, is it after all"a word,""a mere scutcheon?"
31504	If mutable, does it change of itself or do men change it?
31504	Indeed, Plato represents the sage Socrates as frankly confessing his inability to answer satisfactorily the persistent question"What is justice?"
31504	Is it immutable, or does its nature change with changing times and conditions?
31504	Is it simply a quality of action or conduct, or, as stated by Ulpian, is it a disposition or state of mind?
31504	Is it something above and apart from the will of men, or is it simply a matter of convention among men?
31504	Is it the same for all men and races of men or does it differ according to classes and races?
31504	Is it universal or local, the same everywhere or is it different in different localities?
31504	Is there more than one kind of justice?
31504	Still again, and briefly, is justice an inexorable law like the law of gravitation or can its operation have exceptions?
31504	Thus interpreted, are we prepared to confute the statement?
31504	What do they who use those terms mean by them?
31504	Who is to determine what degree of restraint or liberty is necessary to secure this order and harmony, this justice?
31504	Who of us has ever fallen over a chair in the dark without mentally, at least, consigning it to perdition?
32168	As Ames puts it,"the unmoral standard of acting at one''s peril"is replaced by the question,"Was the act blameworthy?"
32168	But are we required to choose?
32168	But does not Miller when hard pressed resort to something very like social- utilitarianism?
32168	But does not this also require demonstration?
32168	But have we any given to us absolutely?
32168	Do the facts come within or fail to come within the legal precept?
32168	Do they promote or do they impede social interdependence through similarity of interest and division of labor?
32168	For how can there be law unless as a body of rules declaring a natural law which is above all human enactment?
32168	Gmelin, Quousque?
32168	If the courts do not respect the law, who will?
32168	Is New York a community of artisans but Massachusetts a community of landowners?
32168	Is the end of law anything less than to do whatever may be achieved thereby to satisfy human desires?
32168	May we not learn something from the futility of all efforts to administer justice exclusively by either method?
32168	May we not refer these phenomena, not to the will of the person bound, but to another postulate of civilized society and its corollaries?
32168	This raises in the first instance the question"How is a merely juridical or rational[ as distinguished from a purely physical] possession possible?"
32168	What common elements may we find in the foregoing twelve pictures of what law is?
32168	What was the need of the time which philosophy was called upon to satisfy?
32168	Why should these"abstract"promises be enforced and not others?
608	And what shall be done to inhibit the multitudes that frequent those houses where drunkenness is sold and harboured?
608	And who shall silence all the airs and madrigals that whisper softness in chambers?
608	And who shall then stick closest to ye, and excite others?
608	As therefore the state of man now is; what wisdom can there be to choose, what continence to forbear without the knowledge of evil?
608	But certain, if execution be remiss or blindfold now, and in this particular, what will it be hereafter and in other books?
608	But some will say, what though the inventors were bad, the thing for all that may be good?
608	For who knows not that Truth is strong, next to the Almighty?
608	I know nothing of the licenser, but that I have his own hand here for his arrogance; who shall warrant me his judgment?
608	Lastly, who shall forbid and separate all idle resort, all evil company?
608	Let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse, in a free and open encounter?
608	Next, what more national corruption, for which England hears ill abroad, than household gluttony: who shall be the rectors of our daily rioting?
608	What but a vain shadow else is the abolition of those ordinances, that hand- writing nailed to the cross?
608	What could a man require more from a nation so pliant and so prone to seek after knowledge?
608	What else is all that rank of things indifferent, wherein Truth may be on this side or on the other, without being unlike herself?
608	What great purchase is this Christian liberty which Paul so often boasts of?
608	What need they torture their heads with that which others have taken so strictly and so unalterably into their own purveying?
608	What should he do?
608	What would ye do then?
608	Wherefore did he create passions within us, pleasures round about us, but that these rightly tempered are the very ingredients of virtue?
608	Who shall regulate all the mixed conversation of our youth, male and female together, as is the fashion of this country?
608	Who shall still appoint what shall be discoursed, what presumed, and no further?
608	should ye suppress all this flowery crop of knowledge and new light sprung up and yet springing daily in this city?
2449	Item quaero an testator legare possit actiones suas? 2449 ''s time have to do with consideration, which not heard of until centuries later? 2449 /2/ But again, What is foresight of consequences? 2449 /4/ So, in another passage, Celsus asks, What else are the rights attaching to land but qualities of that land? 2449 /4/ Where, then, was the line to be drawn between covenants that devolved only to successors, and those that went with the land? 2449 43:In legibus Numae cautum est, ut si quis imprudens occidisset hominem pro capite occisi et natis[ agnatis?
2449	And what makes even knowledge important?
2449	But how are we to decide whether it is material or not?
2449	But how is this actual malice made out?
2449	But suppose the pocket- book had been dropped in a private room, how should the case be decided?
2449	But supposing a state of facts often repeated in practice, is it to be imagined that the court is to go on leaving the standard to the jury forever?
2449	But when does a man become entitled to this absolute protection?
2449	But why?
2449	By the former rule, the question has been narrowed from the vague one, Was the party negligent?
2449	Has any right been acquired?
2449	How are you to decide which is to be done first, that is to say, which promise is dependent upon performance on the other side?
2449	How can it better the heir''s title that another man had trespassed before him?
2449	How comes it, then, that one who has neither title nor possession is so far favored?
2449	How is it decided what those circumstances are?
2449	How then do we decide whether a given term is essential?
2449	How, in short, can a man sue or be sued on a promise in which he had no part?
2449	If we accept the test of the liability alone, how do we distinguish between trover and the mill acts?
2449	Is possession a fact or a right?
2449	Nay, why need the defendant have acted at all, and why is it not enough that his existence has been at the expense of the plaintiff?
2449	Now is it not very evident that the law is looking to a wholly different matter from the defendant''s intent?
2449	Now, how do we settle whether such a condition exists?
2449	Or between conduct which is prohibited, and that which is merely taxed?
2449	Regis, 38; S.C.?
2449	Suppose that the contract is in writing, but does not contain it, does such a previous misrepresentation authorize rescission in any case?
2449	The only thing can be transferred is the benefit or burden of the promise, and how can they be separated from the facts which gave rise to them?
2449	Then the question arises, How do you determine what facts are material?
2449	Were there no contracts proved in that way to which the accidental consideration was wanting?
2449	What is the difference between a duty to repair, and a duty to fence?
2449	What is the difference in the cases?
2449	What was the persona?
2449	Why is possession protected by the law, when the possessor is not also an owner?
2449	Why should it be necessary for one covenant running with the land more than another?
2449	Why, then, might not every gift or sale be regarded as a succession, so far as to insure the same advantages?
2449	Why?
2449	Would this be a sufficient consideration?
2449	[ 246] But what are the rights of ownership?
2449	and if necessary for one, why not for all?
2449	and if so, does it in any case except where it goes to the height of fraud?
2449	to the precise one, Was he on the right or left of the road?
32984	_ The issue_to be tried is whether A owes B anything; and if so, how much?
32984	And how does the trial by jury answer it?
32984	And how had the common people made known their approbation or selection of these laws?
32984	And what does this fact prove, but that the ancient common law courts, in which juries sat, were mere courts of conscience?
32984	And why were they the real and only parliaments of the kingdom?
32984	But are we, therefore, to take no precautions against injustice?
32984	But, it may be asked, how can the minority be trusted to enforce even such legislation as is equal and just?
32984	But, it will be asked, what motive have the majority, when they have all power in their own hands, to submit their will to the veto of the minority?
32984	Facies fieri in omnibus Judiciis tuis equam et rectam justiciam, et discrecionem, in misericordia et veritate, secundum vires tuas?
32984	How is this selection to be made?
32984	How shall it be preserved from degenerating into a mere government for the benefit of a part only of those who established, and who support it?
32984	How shall it be prevented from even injuring a part of its own members, for the aggrandizement of the rest?
32984	In all your judgments, will you cause equal and right justice and discretion to be done, in mercy and truth, according to your powers?
32984	Is this thing mine?
32984	It will be asked, Of what use are the justices, if the jurors judge both of law and fact?
32984	Or is he bound to submit to lose his life, liberty, or property, if they demand it, merely because he is the less numerous party?
32984	Proud from victory, and with their swords in their hands, would they surrender their liberties to a private man?
32984	Servabis Ecclesiæ Dei, Cleroque, et Populo, pacem ex integro et concordiam in Deo secundum vires tuas?
32984	Was it on such a charter that they intended to rely, for all future time, for the security of their liberties?
32984	Was it to obtain such a charter as that, that the whole nation had united, as it were, like one man, against their king?
32984	What are these but courts of conscience?
32984	What else than ignorance of the law is it that excuses judges themselves for all their erroneous decisions?
32984	What else than ignorance of the law is it that excuses persons under the years of discretion, and men of imbecile minds?
32984	What greater certainty can men require or need, as to the laws under which they are to live?
32984	What is such a jury good for, as a protection against the tyranny of the government?
32984	What is the object of government, but to protect men''s rights?
32984	What is there in the nature of men or things to make them so?
32984	What is this but despotism?--and not merely despotism, but insult and oppression of the intensest kind?
32984	What was that principle?
32984	What, then, are the_ essential principles_ of the common law, controlling the selection of jurors?
32984	Who ever heard that succeeding legislatures were, on the whole, more honest than those that preceded them?
32984	Why should they not have such an administration of justice as they desire, and can understand?
32984	Will you preserve to the church of God, the clergy, and the people, entire peace and harmony in God, according to your powers?
32984	and especially the laws, customs, and liberties conceded to the clergy and people by the illustrious king Edward?
32984	and whether his conduct, in disregarding or resisting it, were right in itself?
32984	or is it his?
32984	or is it unjust?
32984	or whether A has in his possession anything that belongs to B; or whether A has wronged B, and ought to make compensation; and if so, how much?
60238	Stop a minute,said Parsons,"do you want advice as to the moral aspect of the case or as to the legal aspect of it?"
60238	True, sir,said Pinkney, who affected to be a man of fashion,"but can a gentleman dress in less than four hours?"
60238	''Oh, how are you?
60238	''What do we care whether Myers agrees with the case, or what Fessenden thinks of the dissenting opinion?
60238	( a) How soon after the death of a testator may his will be admitted to probate?
60238	( b) How soon after the death of an intestate may administration of his estate be granted?
60238	Adams, do you agree with that?''
60238	And what about internal affairs?
60238	Are individual enterprise and talent to be smothered by rule?
60238	At common law what right had a husband in personal property acquired by the wife during coverture?
60238	At the end of the three months was G liable?
60238	Can he succeed if the special relief prayed for fails?
60238	Cave?''
60238	Could he do so?
60238	Could he maintain his action?
60238	Could he maintain his action?
60238	Could he recover?
60238	Could it do so?
60238	Could she succeed?
60238	Could the defendant avail himself of it?
60238	From what date should interest be allowed, if at all?
60238	How can the place be filled?
60238	How could A test his title, B refusing to bring an action?
60238	How drawn?
60238	How is an issue of fact created in a lawsuit?
60238	How many incorporators must there be to incorporate a company in New Jersey?
60238	How recorded?
60238	How should service of summons and complaint be made in a case where an affidavit of merits is desired?
60238	How should the answer be construed?
60238	If so, how should he proceed and what must he show?
60238	In what case and under what circumstances can a writ of error issue directly from the Court of Errors and Appeals to the Court of Oyer and Terminer?
60238	Is our transportation industry to be ruined by taxes and rate control at one end and cost of labor at the other?
60238	Is the Constitution of the United States a worn- out old one- horse shay, ready to drop to pieces all at once?
60238	Is the Senate a back number?
60238	Is the objection good?
60238	Is the peaceful rule by majority to be exchanged for Bolshevik dictatorship?
60238	Or will they, already talking again of a scrap of paper, straightway begin to prepare for a fresh coup twenty- five years or so hence?
60238	Peal after peal: some good news: what is it?
60238	Rawle, will you give the plaintiff''s argument?''
60238	Should he divulge this fact to B, who has had nothing to do with his employment?
60238	Should he recover?
60238	Should the firm divide its fees with the clerk?
60238	Should the motion be granted?
60238	Should the motion be granted?
60238	Should this evidence be admitted?
60238	Should this evidence be received?
60238	The clerk:"Why did you not answer?"
60238	To whom did her real and personal estate go on her death?
60238	To whom did the title to the land and to whom do the bonds descend?
60238	Was he bound to do so?
60238	Was he liable?
60238	Was he liable?
60238	Was he liable?
60238	Was his claim good?
60238	Was it a valid sale?
60238	Was it correct?
60238	Was it valid as to the chattels against creditors of the company?
60238	Was she entitled to the same?
60238	Was the Court right?
60238	Was the judgment binding upon the firm?
60238	Was the principal liable for these acts of the agent?
60238	Was the ruling correct?
60238	Was this charge correct?
60238	Was this contrary to the Bulk Sales Act of 1915?
60238	Was this legal?
60238	Was this legal?
60238	Was this possible?
60238	Was this proper?
60238	Was this ruling correct?
60238	What are the requirements to make an instrument negotiable?
60238	What facts should appear in the certificate and how should it be executed?
60238	What is the difference between the relief granted in equity in cases of mutual mistake and of the mistake of one party?
60238	What is the rule in New Jersey?
60238	What kind of action could M institute against D?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What should the Court do?
60238	What we want to know is:"What''s the law?"''
60238	What would you advise your client to do?
60238	Where may the venue be laid in a transitory action?
60238	Which has priority?
60238	Will peace last?
60238	Will the Germans respect their promises and fulfill them?
60238	Will the treaty finally be ratified?
60238	_ Why not_?
44800	How is that possible,says he,"since these arts were invented by Trismegistus?"
44800	Amongst good laws, one of the best things was, that everybody was taught to observe them( by whom?).
44800	And have I not experience on my side?
44800	And if mankind is not competent to judge for itself, why do they talk so much about universal suffrage?
44800	And is it not clear, that the interest of all being one and the same, some would act without much inconvenience to the others?
44800	And what are these two questions?
44800	And what does this prove?
44800	And what has resulted from it?
44800	And what is liberty?
44800	And what is the remedy proposed?
44800	And what part have men to act in all this?
44800	And who is to give the impulse to power?
44800	And why is incapacity a reason for exclusion?
44800	And, in all sincerity, can anything more be required at the hands of the law?
44800	And, in fact, what is the political work that we are endeavoring to promote?
44800	Are age, sex, and judicial condemnations the only conditions to which incapacity is to be attached?
44800	Are not our persons and property in fact, at its disposal?
44800	Are not rights equal?
44800	Are political rights under discussion?
44800	Are the people to be forever led about by the nose?
44800	Are they not arrived at maturity?
44800	Are they not in a state to judge for themselves?
44800	Are we not living in an age of enlightenment?
44800	Are we not told that liberty is competition?
44800	But are we not assured by Mr. Considerant that liberty leads fatally to monopoly?
44800	But how is it that Mr. Montalembert does not see that he is placing himself in a vicious circle?
44800	But how is it to be distinguished?
44800	But what does it do?
44800	But what is this incline?
44800	But what plunder did he mean?
44800	By whose intervention is society to give tools of labor to those who do not possess them?
44800	Can the law, whose necessary sanction is force, be reasonably employed upon anything beyond securing to every one his right?
44800	Can the people be mistaken?
44800	Do not the legislators and their agents form a part of the human race?
44800	Do they consider that they are composed of different materials from the rest of mankind?
44800	Do they not know their own interest?
44800	Does it follow that if the law confines itself to securing to us the free exercise of our faculties, our faculties will be paralyzed?
44800	Does it follow that if we are free, we shall cease to act?
44800	Does it follow that if we do not receive an impulse from the law, we shall receive no impulse at all?
44800	Does it not lead to an abyss?
44800	Does not Mr. Louis Blanc tell us again that competition{ 45} leads to monopoly, and that, for the same reason, cheapness leads to exorbitant prices?
44800	For what are our faculties, but the extension of our personality?
44800	For who will dare to say that force has been given to us, not to defend our rights, but to annihilate the equal rights of our brethren?
44800	From whom is the State to obtain them?
44800	Have they not acquired their rights at the cost of effort and sacrifice?
44800	Have they not given sufficient proof of intelligence and wisdom?
44800	How has this perversion of law been accomplished?
44800	How is this argument to be answered?
44800	How will you place it under the power of your tribunals, your gendarmes, and of your prisons?
44800	How, in fact, can we imagine force encroaching upon the liberty of citizens without infringing upon justice, and so acting against its proper aim?
44800	In point of fact, who are the capable?
44800	In the one it was wished( by whom?)
44800	In what does the impulse that power gives to society consist?
44800	In what does this power consist?
44800	Is a legislator to be chosen?
44800	Is it any wonder that every failure threatens to cause a revolution?
44800	Is it for the law to make choice of one amongst so many fancies, and to make use of the public force in its service?
44800	Is it likely that it would compromise that greatest of advantages, the public peace?
44800	Is it likely that the enfranchised classes would be very jealous of their privilege?
44800	Is it likely that the excluded classes would not quietly wait for their turn?
44800	Is it to be supposed that Nature has not bestowed upon me sufficient imagination to invent a Utopia too?
44800	Is not justice right?
44800	Is not the law omnipotent?
44800	Is there a man or a class who would dare to claim the right of putting himself in the place of the people, of deciding and of acting for them?
44800	It is the following: What is law?
44800	Liberty of association?
44800	Liberty of labor?
44800	Moreover, every profession had a district assigned to it( by whom?)....
44800	Now socialism, thus defined, and forming a doctrinal body, what other war would you make against it than a{ 15} war of doctrine?
44800	Once on this incline, will society enjoy something like liberty?
44800	That competition tends to drain the sources of consumption, and diverts production to a destructive activity?
44800	That of the machine, which is set in motion; or rather, are they not the brute matter of which the machine is made?
44800	The Socialists say, since the law organizes justice, why should it not organize labor, instruction, and religion?
44800	The liberty of exchange?
44800	Upon what principle is this exclusion founded?
44800	We will give a quotation from Bossuet: One of the things which was the most strongly impressed( by whom?)
44800	What are its limits?
44800	What is its domain?
44800	What is to give it this impulse?
44800	What ought it to be?
44800	What sort of liberty should be allowed to men?
44800	What then?
44800	What will you do then?
44800	What would be the consequences of such a perversion?
44800	What would become of its dignity if it were entrusted to the disciples of Rousseau?
44800	What, then, is law?
44800	When does plunder cease, then?
44800	Where is the law to stop?
44800	Where will you stop?
44800	Where, in fact, does the prerogative of the legislator stop?
44800	Which are the happiest, the most moral, and the most peaceable nations?
44800	Who is to give education and tools of labor?
44800	Why are they prevented?
44800	Why is this?
44800	Why, then, does not society go there of itself?
44800	Why?
44800	You have the gall to call that fine?
44800	and that competition, according to Mr. Louis Blanc, is a system of extermination for the people, and of ruination for trade?
44800	and what is property, but an extension of our faculties?
44800	is more than probable, there will be a no less inevitable revolution?
35783	A_ lily- white benjamin_--is it not so?
35783	About_ what_?
35783	And how have you got your living since?
35783	And now, Sir,said the gentleman, when he had told his story thus far--"and now, Sir, what do you suppose was the cause of all this misery?"
35783	And pray how old may your mother be?
35783	And pray what are you?
35783	And pray what is a_ bob_?
35783	And pray what is''_ inching_ it_ backert_?''
35783	And pray what song was he singing?
35783	And pray, Sir,asked the magistrate,"did he, in effect,''_ bundle_''you down stairs?"
35783	And pray, what is become of the''gentle Desdemona?''
35783	And pray, where did you bring these clothes from, and to whom do they belong?
35783	And pray,asked the magistrate,"did you give the servant the shilling you had promised him?"
35783	And what would you have done with it if you had found it?
35783	Are you sure it was not on_ your head_ when the ball was fired at it?
35783	Are you the man that poked your stick in my eye?
35783	Aye, but then_ you_ wo n''t be there, I suppose, will you?
35783	Burn, do you know anything of this business?
35783	But how came you to alarm these honest people in the way you have done?
35783	But what has all this to do with the stolen linen?
35783	Could you walk steadily?
35783	Did she_ abuse_ you?
35783	Do you think I''m a coal porter, or a ploughman? 35783 Does she grieve much?"
35783	Had you any ground for the charge you made against this young gentleman?
35783	Have you any witness?
35783	How came this hole in your hat?
35783	Is it the bit o''linen your honour''s_ spaking_ about?
35783	Is it true, O''Connor, that you really do sleep whilst on duty?
35783	Is it what I would have done with it, your honour asks?
35783	Is it_ that time_, your honour?
35783	Is she very disconsolate under her bereavement?
35783	Is she very handsome?
35783	Of what age is the lady?
35783	Perhaps you did not go along quietly?
35783	Pray, Sir,said Mr. Minshull,"will you give me leave to ask whether you were ever confined?"
35783	Then what makes you go there so often?--What-- have-- you-- got in your head, Molly?
35783	Then why do you let her drink?
35783	Very good, Misther Hogan; and ye see I would n''t be telling a lie for the matter-- why should I?
35783	Very well, then,continued he--"will I get lave to spake, your honour?"
35783	WHERE SHALL I SLEEP?
35783	Well, Sir, and what of that?
35783	What am I brought here for? 35783 What are you?
35783	What are you?
35783	What do you mean by that-- you scoundrel?
35783	What is your name, friend?
35783	What the devil do you bring me such an infernal quantity for?
35783	What_ can_ you be doing up stairs so much, Molly?
35783	Where is he, then?
35783	Who gave it to him, your worship?
35783	Why did he strike you?
35783	Why do you walk without your breeches, my honest friend?
35783	Will he?
35783	Will you give me your word of honour that you will pay it in a week?
35783	You did!--and pray how did you come by it?
35783	Your name, I believe Miss, is_ Drusilla_----, and you are lately arrived from----?
35783	_ Honour_ is all my eye,said the gentle Juliana Shum?"
35783	_ Miss_ Eliza Pritchard and_ Miss_ Hannah Maria Bagwell, what have you to say for yourselves?
35783	_ Who!_--who has taken her?
35783	_ Your_ seat, Sir?
35783	''And pray, Mr. Clancey,''said I,''would you have the goodness to make me sixpenn''orth of brandy and water, warm, with a little sugar in it?''
35783	''And what would ye be after, Misther Hogan?''
35783	''Did ever any body see such a handsome un?''
35783	''What ring?''
35783	--"And pray may I ask what occupation you follow-- Miss Julia Legge?"
35783	--"What the devil do you want here?"
35783	--pledge your_ honour_ indeed!--will you pledge a_ sovereign_?"
35783	And Misther Hogan sat down by the fire mighty quiet--''And what do I owe you, Misthress O''Reilly,''says he--''for the rint?''
35783	And when I waked up, says I to me--''how comed I here,''says I,''in my own bed,''says I,''before dark?''
35783	Burn?
35783	But I thought I could n''t in conscience ax less?"
35783	But I thought to myself, thinks I, your honour, sure and what would I do with two ould women at one and the same time?
35783	But what was all that to John Brown?
35783	But"who can control his fate?"
35783	Can any one imagine a sharper operation than this must have been?
35783	Did ever anybody see sich a picture?''
35783	Flament would run away--"Then why did you threaten that he would?"
35783	Freshfield?"
35783	His worship having first ordered Mr. Joseph Arnold to be placed at the bar, asked him what he had to say for himself?
35783	How could she put her nose in your mouth?"
35783	Leonard?"
35783	Mahoney?"
35783	Mr. Freshfield replied,"Who, I?
35783	Put the_ blunt_ at Hankey''s, to be safe--''cause would n''t be done, and then lost the cheque!--that''s a rum go-- isn''t it, your worship?"
35783	Sullivan.--"Misthress Sullivan, had you any more of it to say?"
35783	Sullivan?"
35783	The General--"_Confined!_ for what would I be confined?"
35783	The magistrate asked Tom Nagle--"Is it true that you were drunk at the time?"
35783	The magistrate now asked Miss Susanna what_ she_ had to say to it?
35783	There will be nobody there who knows_ me_; and what_ strangers_ will listen to a poor old broken- hearted fellow, who ca n''t speak for crying?"
35783	Tom Nagle,''says he,''what shall I give you for the rum?''
35783	Well, what was to be done now?
35783	Well, what was to be done now?
35783	What could be more annoying than this?
35783	What have I done?
35783	What is it I would n''t do for she?
35783	What was to be done?
35783	What was to be done?
35783	What was to be said for it?
35783	Wolf?"
35783	_ Voilà!_"It was very evident that beneath his black handkerchief he had a dreadful black eye, and the magistrate asked how he came by it?
35783	_ this_ lady,"said his worship;"and what may_ your_ name be, Miss?"
35783	and I went to her place-- that''s in Bainbridge- street, your honour;''and Misthress Casey,''says I,''where''s me_ ring_?''
35783	asked his worship;"what have you to say about the piece of linen?"
35783	asked the magistrate.--"Who was it gave this paper to the man at the bar?"
35783	but would you be kind enough to get us half- a- gallon of mild beer, in this''ere can?"
35783	cried Mr. Bob Briggs,"is that the way to treat a_ gentleman_?"
35783	do you carry your bread and cheese in your hat?"
35783	exclaimed Mr. Highflyer,"what the devil do I care whose house it is?
35783	how dare you insult a lady?"
35783	or are you afraid she should attempt to take away your life?"
35783	or what can one single arm do against a dozen?
35783	said the magistrate,"why how old are_ you_?"
35783	said the magistrate--"have you a wife of your own?"
35783	said the magistrate;"and pray may I ask what trade your lordship follows?"
35783	says I to myself,''and what will I do now?''"
35783	says I,''how did you come by it?''
35783	says she.--''Thank ye, Misthress Casey,''says I.--''Take_ that_ for yerself, Mrs. O''Leary,''says she"--"And what was_ that_?"
35783	vat?
35783	what do you mean by dunkies?"
35783	what is your trade?"
35783	where are you going?"
35783	which way does the bull run now?''
35783	who doth know the bent of woman''s phantasy?"
35783	will you have a mouthful?"
27526	11 Why the charge of sacrilege? 27526 15 94 What vile thing had RealNetworks done?
27526	17 The question is, how big are the holes we need to leave in the private rights? 27526 And so what?"
27526	Do you think it hurts competition?
27526	Does a man have the right to forbid another man to write the same words that he himself wrote first? 27526 Get a license or do not solo"?
27526	How can this have happened? 27526 What is your emotional relationship with your monopoly?"
27526	Why do n''t you read it online?
27526	( How did you do on the test?)
27526	( Remember the Jefferson Warning from Chapter 2?)
27526	( Remember the Sony Axiom from Chapter 4?)
27526	( Some limit the natural right to literary and expressive work; can a mousetrap or a drug molecule express the riddle and wonder of the human spirit?)
27526	10 How should we fit software into the categories of intellectual property?
27526	10 OWNING FACTS?
27526	106 Now how about the case in point?
27526	11 To the question,"Should there be patents over human genes?"
27526	110 Does"George Bush Does n''t Care About Black People"fit that model?
27526	112 Surely the courts did not accept this argument?
27526	12 So where did software fit?
27526	12 What does all this mean?
27526	121 Who is right?
27526	129 What is the solution to all of this?
27526	13 Who can afford to do professional work for nothing?
27526	15 What is the significance of this?
27526	16 This is all very well, but what does it have to do with intellectual property?
27526	16 What about the legal protection of trademarks, the little words or symbols or product shapes that identify products for us?
27526	18 How do we frame the empirical inquiry?
27526	20 HOW MUCH OF THE INTANGIBLE COMMONS SHOULD WE ENCLOSE?
27526	20 How has the DMCA worked in reality?
27526	20 Second, are the principal beneficiaries of the database right in Europe producing databases they would not have produced otherwise?
27526	21 Third, and this one is harder to judge, is the new right promoting innovation and competition rather than stifling it?
27526	23 Are database rights necessary for a thriving database industry?
27526	25 What about Europe?
27526	26 How about the argument that the increasing importance of information- intensive products to the world economy means that protection must increase?
27526	28 But wait, surely theft is theft?
27526	28 So what kinds of creations are being generated by this bold new right?
27526	3 What is to be done?
27526	30 Finally, is the database right encouraging scientific innovation or hurting it?
27526	31 But is that not what copyright is supposed to do?
27526	33 How about idealism?
27526	35 What is wrong with this picture?
27526	37 A NATURAL RIGHT?
27526	37 So how are things different today?
27526	37 Why on earth should we care?
27526	38 What is"synthetic biology"?
27526	4 So were there mistakes?
27526	4 So what views of intellectual property were we carrying forward into the Internet age?
27526	41 Is this portrayal of biology correct?
27526	41 Would it truly be a violation of copyright for me to quote the middle stanza in a nonfiction book on copyright policy?
27526	42 How have we changed the system?
27526	42 So what is"fair use"?
27526	43 How do we get out of the circle?
27526	43 In the language of computer programmers, the issue here is"does it scale?"
27526	43 Why have an exemption at all, in that case?
27526	47 So what First Amendment issues did the DMCA present?
27526	47 To paraphrase a song from my youth,"how did we get here?"
27526	5 But do these mistakes matter?
27526	5 CULTURAL AGORAPHOBIA?
27526	5 So how do we decide the ground rules of the information age?
27526	52 Should this cause us to throw out the economic case for copyrights?
27526	53 The final result?
27526	53 Was this mere musical plagiarism, then?
27526	53 Which of the two First Amendment arguments is more convincing?
27526	54 My colleagues Arti Rai and Sapna Kumar have performed a patent search and found many more patents of similar breadth.13 55 What is the concern?
27526	54 Who can blame the stick figure?
27526	55 DOES PUBLIC INFORMATION WANT TO BE FREE?
27526	55 Did Ray Charles commit copyright infringement?
27526	56 What does this have to do with the Sony case?
27526	58 Does this mean that we no longer need copyright or patent protection to encourage the production and distribution of creative work?
27526	6 Why not use this mechanism to meet your cultural and innovation needs?
27526	62 AN INDUSTRY OF GOLD DIGGERS?
27526	63 BREAKING THE DEAL 64 What would the debate look like if we took some of the steps I mention here?
27526	64 What of the modest suggestions I put forward here?
27526	67 Was Mr. West legally required to ask permission-- and pay, if necessary-- to use a fragment of"I Got a Woman"for his chorus?
27526	69 Was West legally required to license?
27526	7 But what could you do with it?
27526	7 Should you be able to tell the story of Gone With the Wind from a slave''s point of view even if the author does not want you to?
27526	7 So how does the accretive process of musical creativity fare in the modern law and culture of copyright?
27526	71 How much does it take to infringe?
27526	71 What would it mean to pay attention to the changes I have described?
27526	73 How does Kanye West fare under these rules?
27526	74 Does Charles, or his record company, have a valid copyright in the musical composition?
27526	76 What could encapsulate better the process by which information spreads on a global network?
27526	78 Does all this mean that the Jefferson Warning is no longer necessary?
27526	8 In any event, when had the public played a role in intellectual property legislation?
27526	81 What were the concerns of these early critics?
27526	82 What is so great about peer- to- peer systems?
27526	85 What are those opposites?
27526	87 Why specify that one was taking an"evidence- based"approach?
27526	9 Should anyone own the protocols-- the agreed- upon common technical standards-- that make the Internet possible?
27526	9 Who were these sheep?
27526	91 My response would be"Really?
27526	92 Would you have paid to purchase access to each of these?
27526	94 Is the result in this case wrong?
27526	96 What if we were actually moving to extend patents to business methods, or intellectual property rights to unoriginal compilations of facts?
27526	? 28"system was, in effect, saying"this is a long enough protection for me,"enough incentive to create.
27526	A university or a museum or a government?
27526	Adam Mossoff,"Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought about Patents?
27526	Adapt for your own purposes?
27526	Alternatively, is it a"content- neutral"regulation, such as a law that forbids talking-- about any subject-- in a library?
27526	And how many types of innovation or cultural production are as modular as software?
27526	And if not, what is the carefully crafted line we draw that allows some of those uses but condemns this one?
27526	And if the ticket is"free,"who would not take it?
27526	And what about factor 4?
27526	Anecdotal?
27526	Anyone who wrote or distributed a song under the"28?
27526	Are computer programs copyrightable?
27526	Are there constitutional limitations on Congress taking such an action?
27526	Are there no free- speech limitations?
27526	Are we in fact killing musical creativity with the rules that are supposed to defend it?
27526	Are we to criminalize jazz?
27526	As Shirky recounts the story, when the AT&T representatives asked"where do you get your support?"
27526	As an ethical matter, does figuring out how things work, in order to compete with the original manufacturer, count as breaking and entering?
27526	Astrological?
27526	At what point on this continuum does the activity become legally, or morally, unacceptable?
27526	Bizarre Dolly- like clones?
27526	Bob Young of Red Hat claims"every business person wakes up in the morning and says''how can I become a monopolist?''
27526	Bottom line?
27526	But I have to admit his question was something of an epiphany for me: Where do you click to get the actual book?
27526	But a monopoly over Snow White or"Ode on a Grecian Urn"?
27526	But could you copy it?
27526	But even so, would you bother?
27526	But how does it fare if we simply apply the tests laid down in the Grokster case?
27526	But how long a copyright?
27526	But is it true?
27526	But is that the real source?
27526	But is the difference nothing to us?
27526	But is the free and open source community a"commune,"holding tangible property in common and excluding the rest of us?
27526	But is"the incidental restriction of First Amendment freedoms no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest"?
27526	But surely those uses would still be"fair"?
27526	But the idea that the AOL search engine would be replaced by Yahoo and then Google, let alone Google Maps?
27526	But the melody?
27526	But what about competitors?
27526	But what about the number or proportion of types of fair uses affected?
27526	But what about the opposite of property-- property''s antonym, property''s outside?
27526	But what about the places where the value of the public domain is not obvious?
27526	But what about the prohibition of trafficking in digital wire cutters, technologies such as DeCSS?
27526	But what about the start up company that does not have the thousands of patents necessary for entry?
27526	But what do we do about it?
27526	But what do we mean by competition?
27526	But what happens when a given worker wants to quit?
27526	But what if a product as good as the iPod were being developed now by some upstart company?
27526	But what is the purpose of a review if the status quo is always to be preferred?
27526	But when do you have such a market?
27526	But where is the limiting principle or end point of the logic that led to it?
27526	But which way does the difference cut as a matter of ethics, aesthetics, or law?
27526	But why should we care?
27526	But why would we want to foreclose it?
27526	Can copyright cover computer programs?
27526	Can one build a politics to protect a residue?
27526	Can religions secure copyrights over their scriptures?
27526	Can we generalize anything from this limited example?
27526	Can we mitigate the negative effects of intellectual property expansion through a series of privately constructed commons?
27526	Can we use its techniques to solve problems beyond the world of software production?
27526	Can you be sure?
27526	Certainly they are up on the Internet, but does that mean that they are available for reprinting, adaptation, or incorporation in a new work?
27526	Condemn Charles Ives?
27526	Consider this comment of Jeremy Waldron''s and ask yourself-- is this result more likely from within the Jeffersonian or the Lockean view?
27526	Could fair use be dictated by the Constitution or by international free speech guarantees?
27526	Could the Registry of Standard Biological Parts do the same thing?
27526	Could they be technologies that would transform our lives as unimaginably as the Internet has since 1995?
27526	Could we be moving away from faith- based policy in which the assumption is that the more new rights we create, the better off we will be?
27526	Did he use Charles''s song precisely because of these clashing cultural snapshots?
27526	Did the law really develop that way?
27526	Did you?
27526	Digital copies of music were a threat to the traditional music business, but digital copies of books?
27526	Do I grudge this to a man like Dr. Johnson?
27526	Do I immediately and faithlessly desert West for a lower- priced competitor?
27526	Do people accept this as a market?
27526	Do the lines it draws fit with our ethics, our traditions of free speech and commentary, our aesthetic judgments?
27526	Do they now just take the numbers without paying for them, or do they still try to negotiate a license?
27526	Do they traditionally pay such fees?
27526	Do we still get soul?
27526	Do you have such a right?
27526	Does Mr. West infringe this copyright?
27526	Does anyone have an intellectual property right over it?
27526	Does it involve some hyping of the new hot field, some denigration of the older techniques?
27526	Does it make any more sense for sampling?
27526	Does it work that way now?
27526	Does n''t"no harm, no foul"apply in the world of copyright?
27526	Does that inspire confidence for the future?
27526	Does that make it a"commercial"act?
27526	Does that worker receive in cash or kind his share of the gain in value during the period of his employment?
27526	Does the phone company that compiled it own the facts, the numbers inside that directory?
27526	Does the public interest require that men make this sacrifice?
27526	Does this mean that we never need an intellectual property right?
27526	Does this not suggest complicity, or even intent?
27526	Does this really read like the work of a group of believers in natural right?
27526	Does this story still apply in the world of the Internet and the Human Genome Project?
27526	E- mail it to someone?
27526	Even if the objections were not vetoes, but simple demands for payment, would we get"I Got a Woman"and"This Little Girl of Mine"?
27526	Even the ones they claim to have been dictated by gods or aliens?
27526	Fifty years?
27526	First, has the European database industry''s rate of growth increased since 1996, while the U.S. database industry has languished?
27526	For a more technical account, see James Boyle,"Cruel, Mean, or Lavish?
27526	For most though, the question is, what could he possibly have meant?
27526	Forbidding human reproduction?
27526	Forbidding scientific research on the gene without the patent holder''s consent?
27526	Free access to expression and innovation, as opposed to access for pay?
27526	Free trade in expression and innovation, as opposed to monopoly?
27526	Given the extent of the borrowing that jump- started this particular genre- bridging effort, would we be likely to see the birth of soul music?
27526	His solution?
27526	How are authors and publishers and drug manufacturers to make money?
27526	How can this be?
27526	How can this be?
27526	How can this pattern be broken?
27526	How could he conclude that restrictions this broad were"no greater than essential"?
27526	How could millions of people exchanging hundreds of millions of songs not be causing harm?
27526	How could these implausible contributions be organized?
27526	How could things be so one- sided?
27526	How do you decide what to fund and when to fund it, what desires to trade off against each other?
27526	How do you make priorities when the priorities include things you can not rationally value because you do not have them yet?
27526	How does the law apply to the new musicians, remixers, and samplers who offer their work on the Internet?
27526	How exactly had Real"broken into"the iPod?
27526	How far does the supposed natural right extend-- in time, in space, in subject matter?
27526	How important is it that we get the rules of intellectual property right?
27526	How is this flow of information distributed?
27526	How large a commons do we need to offer to future creators?
27526	How long is a natural right in expression or invention supposed to last?
27526	How many of your friends download movies illicitly over the Internet, let alone movies that were ripped from DVDs?
27526	How many types of production, innovation, and research fit into the model I have just described?
27526	How much can they be broken down into chunks suitable for distribution among a widespread community?
27526	How much?
27526	How should we think of it?
27526	How should we understand this strange form of organization?
27526	How will this present a threat to you?
27526	How would the great musical traditions of the twentieth century-- jazz, soul, blues, rock-- have developed under today''s copyright regime?
27526	How?
27526	How?
27526	I started this book with the question from my son about the online catalogue of the Library of Congress:"Where do you click to get the book?"
27526	I would say that they are substantially similar, but was the material used copyright- protected expression?
27526	If I light my candle at yours, am I getting fire for free, when otherwise I would have had to pay for matches?
27526	If I trespass on your land in order to sell a competing product?
27526	If I want to use Real''s service to download music to my own device, where''s the breaking and entering?
27526	If all have the right to graze their herds on common land, what incentive does anyone have to hold back?
27526	If copyright is supposed to be promoting innovation and development in culture, is it doing its job?
27526	If people need Madame Bovary or The New York Times or a new kind of antibiotic, surely the market will provide it?
27526	If so, have they been fixed, and how?
27526	If that new line is drawn according to the logic of control, what technologies will we never see?
27526	If the factors of fair use are seriously applied, how can a three- note excerpt ever fail to be fair use?
27526	If the new technologies enable more theft of intellectual property, must we not strengthen the laws in order to deal with the problem?
27526	If the rights are truly formed for a nonutilitarian purpose, after all, why should they expire?
27526	If this was not contributory copyright infringement, what was?
27526	If you believed the idealized story, would you know what kind of intellectual property laws to write?
27526	In analyzing the DMCA, where do we turn for analogies?
27526	Include it in a manual used by the whole school district?
27526	Information is hard to value until you have it, but once you have it, how can you dispossess yourself of it?
27526	Is it a communist repossession of the sacred rights of authors?
27526	Is it a fair use or not?
27526	Is it competition if I assassinate your employees or poison the food in your restaurant?
27526	Is it feasible?
27526	Is it just stuff that is not worth owning-- abandoned junk?
27526	Is it not silly to equate the protection of the environment with the protection of the public domain?
27526	Is open source an implicit rà © sumà ©- builder that pays off in other ways?
27526	Is open source software a paradigm case of collective innovation that helps us to understand open source software and not much else?
27526	Is that enough?
27526	Is the DMCA a"content- based"regulation, such as a law forbidding labor picketing but allowing other kinds of demonstrations?
27526	Is the DMCA not the same thing?
27526	Is the Database Directive encouraging the production of databases we would not have gotten otherwise?
27526	Is the economic model wrong?
27526	Is the net result a loss to rights holders such that we need to increase protection and control in order to maintain a constant level of incentives?
27526	Is the record companies''idea as outrageous as the demands of my imaginary painter?
27526	Is there a copyright over the products of synthetic biology?
27526	Is there a day when you do not rework for your job, for your class work, or simply for pastiche or fun, some of the digital material around you?
27526	Is this actually a form of potlatch, in which one gains prestige by the extravagance of the resources one"wastes"?
27526	Is this anarchic- sounding method of production economically viable?
27526	Is this signal or noise?
27526	Is this the digital equivalent of trespass or legitimate passage on a public road that runs through your property?
27526	Is this virtuous competitive imitation or illicit copying?
27526	It shall be a crime to circumvent the red dot even if, but for the dot, the use would have been fair"?
27526	It, you might ask?
27526	It, you might ask?
27526	James Boyle,"A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?"
27526	Jazz?
27526	L''intà © rêt public exige- t- il que les hommes fassent ce sacrifice?
27526	Michael A. Heller and Rebecca S. Eisenberg,"Can Patents Deter Innovation?
27526	Must it worry about how to split up the proceeds if someone leaves because of bad karma?
27526	Must the information commons be enclosed because it is now a more important sector of economic activity?
27526	Must we grant an additional forty- five years of commercial exclusivity, not because of economic incentive, but because of natural right?
27526	Now, would the knowledge that this copyright would exist in 1841 have been a source of gratification to Johnson?
27526	Now, would the knowledge that this copyright would exist in 1841 have been a source of gratification to Johnson?
27526	One does not reinvent the wheel, or the method of debugging, so why should one reinvent the hook, the riff, or the melody?
27526	Or could they?
27526	Or did it just make it very, very difficult to exercise those rights legally?
27526	Or do we just get a precious and insular digital subculture, whose cultural experiments never reach the mainstream?
27526	Or is it common ownership and control that we seek, including the communal right to forbid certain kinds of uses of the shared resource?
27526	Or stuff that can not be owned-- a human being, for example?
27526	Or stuff that is collectively owned-- would that be the radio spectrum or a public park?
27526	Or stuff that is owned by no one, such as the deep seabed or the moon?
27526	Or that software code is speech and the DMCA restricts it?
27526	Or what if they thought people were antsy and did not want to watch the FBI notice before every film?
27526	Or would it be quietly smothered due to legal uncertainty?
27526	Perhaps this is the best we can do, but would it not be nice to have a vigorous public debate on the subject?
27526	Presumably government economists in the United States and the European Union have been hard at work ever since, seeing if the right actually worked?
27526	Put it on your own site?
27526	Quote beyond the boundaries of fair use?
27526	Reading the letter-- a curiously intimate, almost voyeuristic act-- one finds oneself saying"What was he thinking?"
27526	Remember Macaulay''s description of how Richardson''s novels might have been censored by a moralistic heir?
27526	Remember these lines?
27526	Right?"
27526	Robert S. Boynton provides a beautifully readable account of copyright''s restrictions in"The Tyranny of Copyright?"
27526	See Adam Mossoff,"Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought about Patents?
27526	See John Williamson,"What Should the Bank Think about the Washington Consensus?"
27526	See also James Boyle,"Cruel, Mean, or Lavish?
27526	Sex, sin, and syncopation-- what more could one ask?
27526	Sheep?
27526	Shirky''s point?
27526	Should copyright follow suit?
27526	Should n''t Its Copyright?"
27526	Should we extend copyright or patent to cover the new technology?
27526	Should we not just list the specific rights about which we are speaking-- copyright, patent, or trademark?
27526	Should we see them as copyrightable how- to books or as uncopyrightable machines made of words?
27526	So leaving aside the legal claim for a moment, where is the ethical foul?
27526	So what?
27526	So what?
27526	So why all the outrage?
27526	So why introduce patents?
27526	Speech or function?
27526	Stan J. Liebowitz,"How Reliable Is the Oberholzer- Gee and Strumpf Paper on File- Sharing?"
27526	Stuff that is not yet owned-- such as a seashell on a public beach, about to be taken home?
27526	Surely Apple''s suggestion that the DMCA might prohibit what Real had done is as baseless as their moral argument?
27526	Surely it would be better to have them doing, well, science?
27526	Surely these could be regulated by Congress?
27526	Surely they would do little to encourage the dead, while imposing considerable costs of access on the living?
27526	Take the song and use it for your video?
27526	That new forms of instant messaging would displace Compuserve''s e- mail?
27526	That the DMCA is a congressionally created off- switch for fair use?
27526	The assumption is that we will return to a norm of freedom, but of what kind?
27526	The blues?
27526	The material that was not published was theoretically under an"all rights reserved"regime, but who cared?
27526	The noble common store of knowledge from which all future creators can build?
27526	The only question to ask is, what''s the resistance of the network?
27526	The pie was carved up differently, but did it get bigger?
27526	The question is not"Do I have a constitutionally protected right of physical access to a preferred version of a movie, so as to make my task easy?"
27526	The question we ask is''what''s the resistance of the wire?''
27526	The worthless remainder of material that is no longer worth protecting?
27526	Theft is theft, is it not?
27526	Their assumption?
27526	There is indeed a broad debate on the reasons that the system works: Are the motivations those of the gift economy?
27526	This was not bias or laziness-- to whom else would they go?
27526	To grant the right to restrict access, so as to allow authors to charge for the privilege of obtaining it?
27526	Transgenic killer rams?
27526	Translate it into your own language?
27526	Underlying it all was a more fundamental question: how do we interpret the rules of copyright so as to encourage musical creativity?
27526	Was it an official and prestigious institution?
27526	Was it appropriate to mix gospel and R&B, devotional music and secular desire?
27526	Was it copyrightable writing or patentable invention?
27526	Was that Mr. West''s point?
27526	Weiss asks rhetorically,"What is the economic and social harm to over 1 billion people from hampered research?"
27526	What about Madame Bovary, or the antibiotic, or The New York Times?
27526	What about Wikipedia?
27526	What about fair use?
27526	What about noncommercial?
27526	What about patents?
27526	What about the tragedy of the commons?"
27526	What about when those steps are put onto the tape of the Turing machine, onto a program running on the hard drive of a computer?
27526	What better way to express their outrage than through their art?
27526	What could better satisfy this condition than a property right over a novel that did not exist before I wrote it?
27526	What could it be?
27526	What could more elegantly state the norms of the"information wants to be free"generation?
27526	What did Jib- Jab do when The Black Lantern sampled them in their turn?
27526	What did our Procrustean legal system do with computers and computer science?
27526	What do these debates tell us?
27526	What does Apple get in the way of property rights?
27526	What does commons- based creativity mean?
27526	What does it matter if I say I will copy your manuscript, if I must do it by hand?
27526	What does that mean in the world of music?
27526	What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all the bugs, documenting his product and distribute it for free?
27526	What if it were no more and no less likely to be used for infringing purposes?
27526	What if the basic building blocks of new scientific fields were being patented long before anything concrete or useful could be built from them?
27526	What if we had locked up most of twentieth- century culture without getting a net benefit in return?
27526	What if we were doing all this in the blithe belief that more property rights mean more innovation?
27526	What if you want to put the course materials on the Net, or publish the anthology, or display the movie?
27526	What is a poor peer- to- peer network to do?
27526	What is it?
27526	What is it?
27526	What is likely to happen if the copyright of one of these books should by descent or transfer come into the possession of some hostile zealot?"
27526	What is that relationship?
27526	What kinds of"genetically engineered machines"do they build?
27526	What might such a politics look like?
27526	What of retrospective extension?
27526	What other approach would one take?
27526	What ties together a critique of digital locks and the access- to- medicines movement?
27526	What would become of libraries in the digital world, of the ideal that access to books had important differences from access to Twinkies?
27526	What would have been the consequence?
27526	What would that consist of?
27526	What would this world, this culture, this science, this market look like?
27526	What''s to resent?
27526	Where does it fit in the"levels of scrutiny"that courts have constructed to discriminate between types of legislation affecting speech?
27526	Where is that movement now?
27526	Where should we turn to understand the role of intellectual property in the era of the Internet and the decoding of the human genome?
27526	Which approach is better?
27526	Which court is correct?
27526	Which group''s attitudes were vindicated?
27526	Which limit is better?
27526	Which network design would you have picked?
27526	Who knew that they needed Post- it notes or surgical stents or specialized rice planters until those things were actually developed?
27526	Who was on the"other side"of these issues?
27526	Who will invest the money, knowing that any product can be undercut by copies that do n''t have to pay the research costs?
27526	Who would know better than they what was needed?
27526	Who would want to keep a system when it is not increasing database production, or European market share, and, indeed, might be actively harmful?
27526	Why could they all agree?
27526	Why create such a right and back it with the force of law?
27526	Why did I not cite any of these?
27526	Why do samplers not simply recreate James Brown''s drumbeat from"Funky Drummer,"or George Clinton''s solo from"Get Off Your Ass and Jam"?
27526	Why do we need to give the people who now hold their copyrights another twenty years of monopoly?
27526	Why does this not happen more often?
27526	Why had I not spoken, he asked, of all the times over the last fifty years when intellectual property rights had been weakened, curtailed, shortened?
27526	Why is it so important?
27526	Why is it that copyrights should"only"last for a lifetime plus seventy additional years, or patents for a mere twenty?
27526	Why is this a good idea?
27526	Why leave things as they are?
27526	Why not here?
27526	Why not?"
27526	Why should he?
27526	Why would anyone choose to allow others to use and modify the results of their hard work?
27526	Why would anyone work on a project the fruits of which could be appropriated by anyone?
27526	Why would they care whether the newcomers, in turn, released their contributions back into the commons?
27526	Why?
27526	Why?
27526	Why?
27526	Why?
27526	Will the argument for copyrights over synthetic biological coding be"I need the property right so I can create a commons"?
27526	Will the exceptions and limitations designed to deal with a copyright over a novel work adequately when they are applied to Microsoft Windows?
27526	Will the high- tech companies think this is just an issue of dumb lawyers failing to understand technology?
27526	Will the pattern be repeated with seismographic, cartographic, and satellite data?
27526	Will whatever benefits it brings outweigh the costs of static and dynamic losses-- price increases to consumers and impediments to future innovators?"
27526	Will you make records under these terms?"
27526	Will"by means of a biological circuit"do the same?
27526	Would TV and radio play into the hands of demagogues?
27526	Would all this amount to a copyright violation?
27526	Would an expanded franchise put the control of the state into the hands of the uneducated?
27526	Would expanded literacy lead to a general coarsening of the literary imagination?
27526	Would fair use be made technologically obsolescent?
27526	Would it have induced him to give us one more allegory, one more life of a poet, one more imitation of Juvenal?
27526	Would it have induced him to give us one more allegory, one more life of a poet, one more imitation of Juvenal?
27526	Would it have once cheered him under a fit of the spleen?
27526	Would it have once cheered him under a fit of the spleen?
27526	Would it have once drawn him out of his bed before noon?
27526	Would it have once drawn him out of his bed before noon?
27526	Would it have stimulated his exertions?
27526	Would it have stimulated his exertions?
27526	Would that amount be greater than the losses imposed on society by extending the right?
27526	Would the business plan ever see the light of day?
27526	Would they have developed at all?
27526	Would this be a violation of copyright law?
27526	Would we be more likely to invent it or forbid it today?
27526	Would we try to build the system around the model of proprietary content dispensed in tightly controlled chunks?
27526	Would we undercut the various nontraditional methods of innovation, such as free software, before they ever managed to establish themselves?
27526	Would you pay to get access to"English Professional Edition"?
27526	You could read it, or look at it, or play it presumably-- otherwise why had the author put it up?
27526	You might manage a single unauthorized showing of the movie-- though to how many people?
27526	You?
27526	the most precious part of himself, that will never perish, that will immortalize him?