Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
29372But where are these feelings and that judgment recorded and preserved?
29372What former age could have supplied facts for such a work as that of Montesquieu?
12427Being a British ship has the British Government a right to seize?
12427Foreseeing the probability that the_ Mashona_ would be brought into Cape Town as prize, Mr. Stowe inquired:"Is foodstuff such as flour, contraband?
4780Are all terrorists and serial killers narcissists?
4780How bad was life for Christian peasants in the Balkans?
4780How effective had all these reforms been by the turn of the century?
4780Human collectives( nations, professions, ethnic groups) and narcissism- stereotyping or racism?
4780Is it fever, one asks, or smallpox?
4780Narcissism and Leadership Are all politicians narcissists?
4780What is pathological narcissism?
4780What is the solution?
20694--Is an hereditary trait?
20694And what are the consequences presumably due to follow in the nearer future from the installation of such a peace at large?
20694Diplomatically speaking, of course, sufficient provocation was found in either case, as how should it not?
20694The question then recurs: How may peace be maintained within the horizon of German or Japanese ambitions?
20694The question will, no doubt, present itself, Is the end worth the cost?
20694Thorough speeding- up("Scientific Management"?)
20694What, if anything, is there in the present situation that visibly makes for a realisation of these necessary terms within the calculable future?
52587And what can the Governments of these nations do with respect to this evil, unless they set themselves to eradicate it?
52587Are they something to be depended upon?
52587But does that prove anything against the usefulness of arbitration clauses in treaties of commerce?
52587Emancipate from what?
52587Is it possible, with this deadly hatred between two of Europe''s most civilized states, to think of a lasting peace?
52587Should we then, they say further, be the first people to take such a step?
52587Will they be carried into effect?
52587Would it not be equivalent to begging peace of our neighbour, and declaring ourselves incapable before the whole world?
52587and with what result?
13858Alien Enemy can not Sue in this Country, 9 Who is Enemy?, 21 Natural Enemies, 23 FUNDS.
13858Are not then the foundations of the laws that governed this case changed?
13858Are there any modern principles of right and justice by which such persons are still to claim consideration?
13858But what are the principles of right and wrong?
13858It may immediately be asked-- How is that public opinion to be ascertained?
13858To commence with the question, Who is the international legislator?
13858What is just?
13858What is the position of these persons at the commencement of war?
13858What is the real and true criterion?
13858Who, in fact, are our enemies?
32148Can England claim his extradition?
32148Can the crew be punished?
32148Could Germany have complained and asked for damages?
32148Has Abel become a Prussian subject?
32148Has the Declaration of London, 1909, any influence on the validity of this old treaty stipulation?
32148How is the controversy to be settled?
32148Is this occupation valid?
32148What is the nationality of the child?
18553Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? 18553 2d If a case can exist in which a sound maxim may,& ought to be departed from, is not the present instance, precisely that case? 18553 But the reader may ask, what is the use in signing any treaty if nations are so devoid of good faith? 18553 For how would they propose to get at either enemy without superior fleets? 18553 Have you noticed how the world will take anything nowadays from a German? 18553 How can I make bricks without straw? 18553 Why did Germany back down from her position? 18553 Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? 18553 Will Japan respect the pledges she has made and live up to the spirit of her promises? 18553 With the removal of the German menace, what reasons were there for Great Britain to continue the alliance? 35530 And were the results of the French Revolution worth the cost of the terrible barbarism and suffering that took place? 35530 As war assumes the right to kill human beings, what rights, then, have the victims left over that are worth mentioning? 35530 But how can this be done? 35530 But to reach such a happy realization of the truth what are we, the people, to do now? 35530 For instance, did the precedence belong to Spain, and what marks of honor were due to the representatives of the neutral powers? 35530 How could we then expect the people of the seventeenth century to do this? 35530 How many, at the present time, can look at their country, its ideals, ideas, and customs justly and without prejudice? 35530 In short, are they unselfish enough to so temper their justice with mercy as to establish a world peace, the greatest boon to humanity ever known? 35530 Is there, for instance, any kind of war that has resulted in doing away with itself permanently? 35530 Shall we not begin at once and persist in doing this until political wars become as impossible in the future as religious wars are now? 35530 The question soon arises, Shall combination and regulation go beyond national limits? 35530 Will the victorious Allies arise to the occasion and make future wars improbable, if not impossible? 35530 Will they be magnanimous and give up some national advantages of the present for future international benefits to all mankind? 35530 Would not the results of the French Revolution, which cost so much bloodshed, have been obtained without violence later, through gradual evolution? 33302 Are international courts valueless if states are not bound to submit their disputes to them? 33302 CHAPTER I THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SOCIETY OF STATES[ Sidenote: Is the law of nations an anarchic law?] 33302 Does the International Prize Court restrict the sovereignty of the several states? 33302 Does the constitution of the International Prize Court violate the principle of the equality of states? 33302 How then must and will this organization take shape? 33302 If at the outbreak of a war he be resident in the territory of the enemy, can not he be expelled? 33302 If he contribute to a loan raised by the enemy, will not his own state punish him for treason? 33302 In conclusion the great question is, what is to happen if a state declines to accept the decision of the international court to which it has appealed? 33302 Is not his property on many occasions-- for example, during a siege or a bombardment, or on the field of battle-- destroyed without compensation? 33302 Is the law of nations an anarchic law? 33302 Must he not, if his fatherland is completely conquered and annexed by the enemy, reconcile himself to becoming a subject of the enemy? 33302 We might therefore quite well substitute the term_ agreeing a law_ for the term_ decreeing a law_,--but why introduce a new technical term? 33302 What is to be done if a state refuses to accept the decision of an international court? 33302 Would the formation of an international Prize Court of Appeal infringe the sovereignty of the several states? 33302 [ Sidenote: Are international courts valueless if states are not bound to submit their disputes to them?] 33302 [ Sidenote: Does the International Prize Court restrict the sovereignty of the several states?] 33302 [ Sidenote: Does the constitution of the International Prize Court violate the principle of the equality of states?] 33302 [ Sidenote: What is to be done if a state refuses to accept the decision of an international court?] 33302 [ Sidenote: Would the formation of an international Prize Court of Appeal infringe the sovereignty of the several states?] 28950 Another difficulty about plebiscites is this: Is their effect perpetual or not, and if not how long does it last? 28950 But suppose the vote is very close; how about a vote where a little over half of the population go one way and a trifle under half go the other? 28950 Does it have the same moral effect as a larger vote? 28950 Had or had not hostilities broken out within the meaning of Article 10 of the Protocol? 28950 How then can a State become a party to this temporary and provisional paper if it is not a party to the permanent and definitive document? 28950 If Tyrone votes for Dublin today, is it an eternal decision or only till another vote in 1930, or till when? 28950 In such circumstances, who could say, what tribunal could decide, thejust"frontier?
28950Instead of considering the dispute, the Council says to the parties: Is there not some kind of a tribunal to which you are willing to refer it?
28950Is a majority of one vote just as good as a majority of ninety per cent.?
28950Is this a matter for non- Members of the League?
28950Is this conclusive?
28950So I regard these provisions as to an armistice as the most ingenious[ Transcriber''s note: ingenuous?]
28950Suppose, however, that there is an actual state of war; how is it to be determined which one of the two[6] belligerents is the aggressor?
28950Suppose, however, the mediation fails, what is the next duty of the Council?
28950The questions suggested are: Could the United States protest; and would we protest?
28950Was the position to be perpetuated, he asked, by which any one member of the Council could completely prevent a peaceful settlement of a dispute?
28950What is our answer to that situation?
28950What is the answer to this difficulty?
28950What is the international phase of such situations as this?
28950What progress has been made during these four years?
28950What would happen if the Dutch put an embargo upon the exportation of this drug?
28950Where does all this leave the problems of disarmament and security?
28950Where was the fate of the German colonies decided-- in East Africa and in the Pacific, or on the Western Front?
28950Would the United States have the right under international law to object to such a blockade?
28950[ 11] The questions are: Is the area to vote as a whole or by districts, and where is the line of the voting area to be drawn?
28950[ 6] Did the World War end merely in deciding the question about the rights of Austria and Serbia in connection with the murder of the Archduke?
26023But how is it possible to establish at present a powerful Federal Government over the whole world?
26023But is this assertion correct?
26023But what about an International Army and Navy?
26023But what about the Central Powers, and Germany in especial?
26023But what kind of organisation of the League of Nations is possible if we reject the idea of a Federal State?
26023Can the Powers which enter into the League of Nations trust to the security which it promises?
26023Central Powers, the, are they to become members of the League of Nations?
26023Germany, is she to become a member of the League of Nations?
26023How can we expect that she will carry out the engagements into which she might enter by becoming a member of the League of Nations?
26023How is it possible to establish a Federal World Parliament?
26023Is the assertion really true that States renounce their sovereignty by entering into the League?
26023Law- making treaties, what are?
26023Now what is new in the desired new League of Nations?
26023Now what was the reason that antiquity did not know of any International Law?
26023Now why would the several States claim a right to appoint at least one man of their own choice as judge?
26023Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
26023That leads me to the question: What is a nation?
26023The Great Powers, are they really the legally recognised superiors of the minor States?
26023What is Internationalism?
26023What is militarism?
26023What is the cause of this divergent interpretation of an article, the literal meaning of which seems to be quite clear?
26023Where is this beginning of the development to be found?
26023Why is a World State not possible, at any rate not in our time?
26023Why is this assertion incorrect?
26023Why not?
26023Why not?
26023Will it be different in the future?
26023Will the League really stand the test of History?
26023Will the new League stand the strain of such conflicts as shake the very existence of States and Nations?
20224''I guess that makes me the Prime Minister of England, but what can I do for you?''
20224***** But beyond that, what can we do?
20224***** What should we do about Berlin?
20224***** Who are these autocrats who have become so powerful that they can condition, if not control, public opinion?
20224***** Who made the decisions to pull our armies back in Europe and let the Soviets take over?
20224About Berlin?
20224And they have engaged actively, and with the expenditure of enormous sums, in propagandizing(''educating''?)
20224But how many Americans know those simple facts?
20224But why would any American want( or, under any conditions, agree to) the crazy Berlin agreement?
20224Chapter 12 WHY?
20224Congressman H. R. Gross( Republican, Iowa) asked a question:"What interest rate will be charged upon the loans that are to be made?"
20224Discussion of this topic was divided into four corollary questions:_ Why Two Chinas?
20224Does Red China threaten''uncommitted''Asia?
20224Gross:"What will be the length of the loan to be made?"
20224How could the Treasury Department ever be persuaded to take action against the Council on Foreign Relations, when the Council controls the Department?
20224One question posed that year was"Should U. S. Deal With Red China?"
20224Or, are they so dishonest that they distort the facts, thinking that the public is too confused or ignorant to discover the truth?
20224Or, are they too stupid to understand this?
20224WHAT CAN WE DO?
20224What Can We Do?
20224What are Red China''s goals?
20224What could there possibly be for a Council on Foreign Relations to do?
20224What has so dulled our sense of moral values that we could look on without revulsion while he was being wined and dined by our officials?
20224What part should we play?
20224What will it be like if we join a world government that embraces the real have- not nations of the earth?
20224What, for example, could we do about Cuba?
20224Who were the"distinguished"Americans whom Eisenhower appointed to draw this blueprint of America''s National Purpose?
20224Why do prominent Americans support programs which are so harmful?
20224Why, then, do we need this new one, the Development Loan Fund?
20224Why?
14447Are we at war with Venezuela?
14447Are we, with Admiral Aube, to speak of"cette monstrueuse association de mots: les droits de la guerre"?
14447But what is an international"usufruct"?
14447Can Mr. Jenks really suppose that in making this remark I was"appealing from the''text of the Petition''to the debates in Parliament"?
14447Can a"great centre of population"claim this character, although it contains barracks, stores, and bodies of troops?
14447IS COAL CONTRABAND OF WAR?
14447Is France at war with Siam?
14447Is it too much to hope that similar aids to the understanding of complicated legislative proposals will be systematically provided in the future?
14447Is this so?
14447Lequel des deux est la règle?
14447Lequel l''exception?
14447May I refer him, for an explanation of this phenomenon, to the words( now italicised) omitted in his quotation of my statement?
14447One also asks: Under what circumstances does a place,_ prima facie_,"undefended,"cease to possess that character?
14447Or is France still at peace with Siam, and merely putting upon her that form of pressure which is known as"pacific blockade"?
14447SECTION 1_ On the Open Sea_"THE FREEDOM OF THE SEAS"?
14447Secondly, are future wars likely to be conducted without regard to international law?
14447The answer to Sir William Harcourt''s unanswered question,"Were there no rules settled at the Hague?"
14447This difference was well summed up at one of our meetings by Professor Westlake as follows:"Conservation et passage, comment combiner ces deux droits?
14447To Mr. Morley''s enquiry,"Have we no rules of our own?"
14447What is likely to be the character of such a"maximum programme"as will doubtless be aimed at by the proposed gathering?
14447What principles are applicable to the solution of the novel questions suggested by these competing claims?
14447Which shall it be?
39588Daddy, may we?
39588Dora, is that you?
39588Have n''t you got any cotton wool for us to plug our ears with?
39588How many kids are there under way that''ll never come to see their dads?
39588I only wanted to ask if those are wild beasts, or if they''re what are called human beings you''ve torn to pieces there?
39588Ready?
39588So you wish me to stay behind, and the others to go and die for us?
39588What others?
39588What''s the good of that how- d''ye- do? 39588 Where are you going, Daddy?"
39588***** Where then lies the truth?
39588... who can tell whether he has been hit or not?...
39588A murderer?
39588Aim steadily-- straight for the chest.... Who is it really facing me?
39588An enemy?
39588And didst Thou not die for the whole human race?
39588And do we cling so passionately to this life?
39588And trembling, we lie down... and over our heads rushes something that howls for our flesh.... What''s the next thing?
39588Are there nothing but dead abroad this night?...
39588Are we going to attack?
39588Are you not glad?
39588But curt and sharp, as we knew it, the rasping note of command responds:"What the devil''s the matter with you?
39588But what''s the good of that in these times of famine prices?
39588But what''s to happen when hundreds of thousands of others have to go out sewing too?
39588But what''s to happen when hundreds of thousands of others have to start a shop?
39588Ca n''t you hear?
39588D''you take me for a thief?"
39588Didst Thou not love mankind?
39588Do n''t they envy us our sweet death?
39588Do n''t you know me any more?"
39588Dost Thou shudder at these sons of men?
39588Got a head?
39588Has every human being been fusilladed?
39588Has that ceased to be a case of man to man?
39588How can these two worlds be so terribly close to each other?...
39588How far does his power reach?
39588How long have I been running?...
39588How will the sinister Emperor take it?
39588I am distinctly conscious that my chest is reverberating like a tense sounding- board---- What on earth is that?
39588I throw myself on my face, my rifle at the ready.... Why does the order fail to reach us?
39588I wonder how many dead this war will ac count for?
39588I wonder what is passing through their brains?
39588If only every fifth man is left on the field, and if another fifth comes home invalided... what will its harvest amount to then?
39588Is n''t our native land worth more than this scrap of life?
39588Is the reason because we only have one life to lose?
39588Or are both lies--"both deliberate conscious untruths, written under the inspiration of a social democratic lawyer?"
39588Shall we have to retreat?
39588The first line is lying shot down in the stubble... what''s the next thing?
39588Then are we a breed of men other than our fathers?
39588What do the strangers care?
39588What does it matter even if the bullet finds its billet more surely?
39588What has happened?
39588What is an enemy?
39588What is that crawling along the ground behind our line?...
39588What is their quest here on foreign soil?
39588What percentage of the living will modern warfare claim?
39588What was it they once taught us at school?
39588What will the next few days have in store for us?
39588What''s the next thing?
39588What''s the next thing?
39588Where have horse and rider vanished?
39588Where is my sword?
39588Where''s she to turn for money when the post- office savings book is finished?
39588Where?--where?...
39588Who was this Christ Who is to aid us, and Whose blood we drink?
39588Why are you blinking at me with your bleared eyes, my brother?
39588Why do I, all of a sudden, begin to shudder?
39588Why do n''t I pull it through?
39588Will they come on again?
39588Wonder how many clips of cartridges am I going to get through?
39588Wonder how the little chap is getting on?
39588Wonder if any one else in barracks is lying wide- eyed and staring into the future?
39588Wonder if it''ll last much longer?
39588Wonder if she has chanced to be thinking of me?
39588Wonder if there will be a bull''s- eye among them?
39588Wonder whether my wife still goes on remembering her dead husband-- and my two kiddies-- whether they have already forgotten their father?
39588Wonder whether she slept well to- night?
39588Wonder whether the sun still goes on shining above us?--whether they still know how to laugh in the towns as we used to in our time?
39588Wonder whether the war will last long?
39588Wonder whether they have engines of such perfect precision on the other side?
39588Yes, but what are we to fire at?
39588how can these things be?
33153Have you,he might ask,"always been peaceful?
33153Shall we,asked Pitt,"give up our maritime consequence and expose ourselves to scorn, to derision, and contempt?
33153Where were you when the world was divided?
33153Whom does it pay? 33153 251- 2(?). 33153 Against such an organised body what can a single manufacturer avail? 33153 Are we to mete out justice even- handed to the Poles, Finns and Jews of Russia, the Czechs and Southern Slavs of Austria, the Armenians and Alsatians? 33153 Are we, for instance, to become the defenders of small nationalities, ready to go to war whenever one is invaded? 33153 As for the heroic warriors of the Scotch border, would they not to- day be{ 25} jailed as cattle- thieves? 33153 But if nations will not gladly accept arbitration where supposedly vital interests are concerned, can they not be coerced? 33153 But to whom do the dividends go? 33153 Can we change in human nature that desire for material things, which has always been the great survival virtue of the race? 33153 Did you not fight England, Mexico and Spain? 33153 Even if war does not cease, however, may we not at least be exempt from the scourge on this safe side of the broad Atlantic? 33153 Has a small nation a right to hold its present territory when that right conflicts with the economic advance, let us say, of a whole continent? 33153 Have we not here an alternative to war? 33153 Have you not taken advantage of your neighbours''necessities?
33153How could she solve the problem of a dwindling supply of iron ore?
33153How does the English workman prosper when English capital employs cheap Indian labour to undersell British factories?
33153How is France ahead of us?
33153How is he to secure this support?
33153How then will Germany compete?
33153If England( with Wales) could in 1821 barely support twelve millions, how could she maintain thirty- six millions in 1911?
33153If Europe did not solve the Balkan problem in peace, did Americans end slavery without resort to arms?
33153If Germany violates Belgium''s neutrality, why should England surrender her power to put the maximum pressure upon her unscrupulous enemy?
33153If there is to be neither war nor an effective international regulation, what limits can a nation set to non- military aggression by its neighbour?
33153If therefore the foreign field is to be extended, why is the German eternally to be left out in the division?
33153If two hundred thousand volunteer for a war when we are not obviously attacked, will not the whole country go to war for the sake of"honour"?
33153Is Russia to control the Yellow Sea or is Japan?
33153Is it amity or enmity?
33153Is it impossible to allay hatred of the foreigner by concentrating interest on home concerns?
33153Is such a development probable?
33153Is the Persian Gulf to be British, Russian or German?
33153Make your profits at home"?
33153May we not be simply undermining Germany and Austria?
33153Moreover, what advantage is it to the wage- earner to have his country''s wealth exported beyond his reach?
33153Not immediately, not inopportunely, but in the right season?
33153On what broad general principle shall we decide the urgent questions which arise day by day in most unexpected conjunctions?
33153Should we compel Russia to treat her Poles and Jews fairly and concede to Russia the right to compel us to treat our Negroes fairly?
33153Should we fight Japan to aid China?
33153Should we have interposed to save Persia from benevolent absorption by Russia and England?
33153Should we respect Canada''s right to keep New York, had that city originally been settled by Canadians?
33153Should we war against Germany because of Belgium, and against France and England because of Greece?
33153Though it rains outside, may we not keep dry beneath our big umbrella?
33153We should be richer to- morrow if we took Mexico, but would it pay in the end?
33153What are we willing to fight for rather than forego?
33153What could Germany do if foreign nations shut her off from access to ores, foods and textiles?
33153What do we already have or claim, the retention of which would justify us in fighting?
33153What is the probable, or at least possible, policy of Russia in such circumstances?
33153What is to decide what colonies shall belong to what nation or what share each nation shall have in the profits of exploitations?
33153What is''in it''for the nations or for classes or individuals within the nations?"
33153What profit has the French artisan or peasant in all these grand concessions from the illustrious Sultan of Morocco?
33153What, after all, do the hundred million Americans want beyond their borders?
33153While we work for these ideals, are we to allow Germany to sink our liners and Japan to swallow up China, or are we to fight?
33153Why is France''s colonial empire more than two and a half times as large as that of Germany?
33153Why should we alone, among the nations be exempt from economic forces, which drive peace- loving nations into war?
33153Why, then, is Germany''s course so bitterly resented?
33153Will the nations in this generation or in five generations agree to make sacrifices to permit their rivals to live?
33153Would not the threat of it and the knowledge that it could be used form a potent restraint upon the law- breaker?
33153Would such a conquest accord with our larger policies and our true ambitions in the world?
11895What is this I hear, Jones, that you do not believe in the Monroe Doctrine?
11895A critic once put to me what he evidently deemed a poser:"Do you urge that we shall be stronger than our enemy, or weaker?"
11895And does Mr. Chesterton suggest that the war system settles these matters to perfection?
11895And does the passage I have quoted mean that we-- that English diplomacy-- has had no part in European diplomacy in the past?
11895And if it is not true?
11895And if that assumption-- plainly indicated as it is by a Liberal Minister-- is right, who can say that Lord Roberts''conclusion is not justified?
11895Are theories and logic of the slightest use, since force alone can determine the issue?
11895Are those Pacifists, who try at the same time to be Democrats, prepared to acquiesce in such a conclusion?
11895But does this mean that if one threatens to take my purse, I am not allowed to use force to prevent it?
11895But what are the facts?
11895But what, it will be said, is the practical outcome?
11895Can not we afford to set aside those old passions and see how far in one particular at least they may have been right?
11895Could any remedy have been devised on the whole so conclusive and complete as that used by the Balkan peoples?
11895Could we ask a better illustration than the history of the Turk and his Christian victims?
11895Do we know the intention of England with reference to Woman''s Suffrage or Home Rule or Tariff Reform?
11895Does a First Lord want new ships?
11895Does he want to join in Armageddon?
11895Face to face with this manifestation, who is the man bold enough to say that force is never a remedy?
11895Had he read these volumes, that he talked so disrespectfully of their contents?
11895Has our own policy been a large factor in determining that of the Powers?
11895Has our own policy directly prevented in the past the triumph of the Christian populations which, despite that policy, has finally taken place?
11895Have not the Balkan peoples redeemed War from the charges too readily brought against it as simply an instrument of barbarism?
11895Have questions of profit and loss, economic considerations, anything whatever to do with this war?
11895Have we not, on the contrary, by universal admission played a predominant role by backing the wrong horse?
11895How, therefore, can we know the intentions of"Germany"?
11895I replied as follows: Mr. Cecil Chesterton says that the question which I have raised is this:"Should usurers go to war?"
11895Is War impossible?
11895Is it futile?
11895Is it not a commonplace that in India, quite as much as in the New World, the trader and the settler drove out the soldier and the conqueror?
11895Is it unlikely?
11895Is not force a remedy, and at times the only remedy?
11895Is not war therefore inevitable, and must we not prepare diligently for it?
11895More and more is religious effort being subjected to this test: does it make for the improvement of society?
11895Now the question immediately arises: Are we prepared to arm any International Tribunal with any such powers?
11895Now why should there be any danger of Germany bringing about this catastrophe unless she could profit enormously by so doing?
11895Now, do these things constitute as a national policy an inspiring aim or not?
11895Now, looking back upon what has since happened, which view shows the greater wisdom and prevision?
11895Or would we urge that to do so is the way to carry on a trade, or a nation, or a government, or make it the basis of human relationship?
11895Shall we wait till Consols are 65 and our national credit is gone?
11895Shall we wait till Germany''s present naval programme, which is every year reducing our advantage, is complete?
11895Shall we wait till the smouldering industrial revolution, of which all these strikes are warnings, has broken into flame?
11895That if he threatens to kill me, I am not to defend myself, because"the individual citizens are not allowed to settle their differences by force?"
11895That it has worked satisfactorily in Ireland and Finland, or, for the matter of that, in Albania or Macedonia?
11895That of the man who delivered this speech( and he was John Bright) or those against whom he spoke?
11895The outlook is not very pleasant, is it?
11895The same correspondent says he is constantly being asked:--"Is there no means of avoiding war?"
11895Thus Mr. Cecil Chesterton[5]: In essence Mr. Angell''s query is:"Should usurers go to war?"
11895To which set of principles has time given the greater justification?
11895Unhappily, one has to ask whether some of these military Pacifists really want it to succeed?
11895WHAT MUST WE_ DO_?
11895WHAT MUST WE_ DO_?
11895Was it the mere hazards of war which gave to Great Britain the domination of India and half of the New World?
11895Was our own policy at fault when we were led into a war to ensure the"integrity and independence of the Turkish dominions in Europe"?
11895What Shall we DO?
11895What do we mean when we speak of the money of a nation, or the self- interest of a community?
11895What has Pacifism, Old or New, to say now?
11895What must inevitably happen if the nations take the line of the"practical man,"and limit their energies simply and purely to piling up armaments?
11895What precisely does it mean?
11895What then must we_ do_?
11895What would you have had me reply to those Germans?"
11895Who is the man who is foolish enough to say that martial virtues do not play a vital part in the health and honour of every people?
11895Why does Mr. Churchill say it has?
11895Would any serious politician now be found to deny it?
11895Would the demonstration of its economic futility have kept the peace?
11895Would those incendiaries be entitled to say that the town authorities were incendiaries also, and"believed in setting light to towns?"
11895Yet that is whither the nations are blindly drifting Who, then, makes war?
11895[ 7] What have peace theories to do with this war?
11895_ War with Germany is inevitable_, and the only question is-- Shall we consult her convenience as to its date?
11895_ Why_ should we do it?
11895in the pound?
39487But may not a prince go to war justly for his right?
39487But what of wars against the Turk?
39487Sed quid ad nos?
39487What new manner of pageant is this that I behold? 39487 And again, what thing is more necessary? 39487 And if any man would inform her, that it were man that she beheld in such array, might she not well, with great wondering, say these words? 39487 And nevertheless if men will so much lean to the example of the Jews, why do we not then in like manner use circumcision? 39487 And then we go and curse the Turk; and what can be a more pleasant sight to the Turks, than to behold us daily each slaying other? 39487 And think ye that it will grieve them, that be of this mind, to enter lightly into war, when any cause is offered? 39487 And what thing is so repugnant to charity as war? 39487 And why had we rather follow the uncertain examples, than the authority that is sure and certain? 39487 And why not, since we have learned by the law civil, that the very order of charity is, that every man must first provide for himself? 39487 But why should we not( say they) kill them that would kill us? 39487 But( O good Lord) for what trifling causes what tragedies of war do we stir up? 39487 But, alas, what shall the eyes see, where the mind is away? 39487 Did any war ever lack a title? 39487 Did ye never behold a lion let loose unto a bear? 39487 Do we to no purpose pray as taught by Christ: Good Lord, even as thy will is fulfilled in heaven, so let it be fulfilled in the earth? 39487 Finally, if Christian men can not despise and set at naught these so light things, yet whereto need they by and by to run to arms? 39487 First of all, what in all this world is more sweet or better than amity or love? 39487 For what is more delectable than a friend? 39487 For what thing is there, either spiritual or temporal, that is not done with great show of riches? 39487 From whence are those iron horns? 39487 From whence cometh to thee this voice more horrible than of a wild beast? 39487 From whence hast thou that shining helmet? 39487 From whence hast thou that threatening crest upon thy head? 39487 From whence then cometh all this tumult of wars amongst the children of peace? 39487 From whence, then, creepeth this pestilence in among Christian people? 39487 How oft have people gone from one country to another? 39487 I beseech you, who would believe that they were men, if it were not because war is a thing so much in custom that no man marvelleth at it? 39487 If it be but a tale that is told of Christ, why do we not openly put him out of our company? 39487 In war if there happen anything luckily( but, O good Lord, what may we say happeneth well and luckily in war? 39487 Now if men will needs follow the example of Peter that fought, why might they not as well follow the example of him forsaking his Master? 39487 Of whence are those hard plates? 39487 Peradventure some man will say: Wouldst not have princes fight for their right? 39487 Since we abhor those things, why doth the example of war please us so much? 39487 Then will ye hear, what a deed they durst at the last do? 39487 Think ye it a fable, that Christ calleth himself a vine tree, and his own the branches? 39487 Trow ye it is a good Christian man''s deed to slay a Turk? 39487 Trow ye that Nature could here know it was the same thing, that she sometime had wrought with her own hands? 39487 Trow ye, was he not mad, when he wrote letters to the mountain called Athos, threatening that the hill should repent except it obeyed his lust? 39487 What a business hath he to make and entertain friends to help him? 39487 What a look and countenance hast thou more terrible than of a brute beast? 39487 What availeth it with so great troubling to change any title, which in short space by one chance or other must go to another man? 39487 What do all the epistles of Paul sound in every place but peace, but long- suffering, but charity? 39487 What evil spirit hath thus defiled my work? 39487 What gapings, what roarings, what grisly gnashing, what tearing of their flesh, is there? 39487 What hath chanced, that this creature is changed into such a brute beast? 39487 What is he that can reckon all the incommodious life that the most foolish soldiers suffer in the field? 39487 What is the law of Christ? 39487 What nation hath not fought and skirmished with another? 39487 What nation is there that hath not sometime been put out of their own country, and also have put other out? 39487 What need many words? 39487 What other thing did Peter? 39487 What other thing did all the true Christian writers? 39487 What sorceress hath thus turned him out of his kindly shape? 39487 What speaketh Saint John, what rehearseth he so oft, but love? 39487 What witch hath bewitched the mind of man, and transformed it into such brutishness? 39487 What, a tent? 39487 Whence are those deadly weapons? 39487 Whence cometh it, that thine elbows are so sharp and piked? 39487 Where be the innumerable teachings of peace? 39487 Where be they so many sacraments of perfect concord? 39487 Where hadst thou those brazen teeth? 39487 Where hadst thou those scales? 39487 Where hast thou gotten this thunder and lightning, both more fearful and hurtful than is the very thunder and lightning itself? 39487 Where is the kingdom of the devil, if it be not in war? 39487 Who but a madman will angle with a golden fish- hook? 39487 Who did ever see one branch fight with another? 39487 Who will deny but Alexander the Great was mad also? 39487 Whoever saw the eye fight with the hand, or the belly with the foot? 39487 Why are these few examples most in mind? 39487 Why do we here follow the bare letter that killeth? 39487 Why do we not abstain from swine''s flesh? 39487 Why do we not sacrifice with the blood of sheep and other beasts? 39487 Why do ye not hate them that hate you? 39487 Why do ye not scold and chide at them that rail at you? 39487 Why do ye not, then, rob those that have robbed you before? 39487 Why doth not each of us we d many wives? 39487 Why draw we Christ into war, with whom a brothel- house agreeth more than war? 39487 Why had we rather have war than peace? 39487 Why sent he forth his disciples again tyrants, armed with nothing else but with a walking- staff and a scrip? 39487 Why shall I claim a title I know not, and a doubtful right, with spilling of my subjects''blood? 39487 Why shall I depart so many honest wives and their husbands, and make so many fatherless children? 39487 Why should men add the horrors of war to all the other miseries and dangers of life? 39487 Why should one man''s gain be sought only through another''s loss? 39487 Why should we glory in his title? 39487 Why turn we our eyes from Christ to men? 39487 Will ye bring the Turks to the faith of Christ? 39487 Will ye see how beastly, how foul, and how unworthy a thing war is for man? 39487 Will ye see how small a matter it is that we make all this tumult for? 39487 Yet from whence cometh it into our minds, that one Christian man should draw his weapon to bathe it in another Christian man''s blood? 39487 You mistrust a prince of your own alliance, and will you commit yourself wholly to an armed multitude? 39487 what a business to procure bands of strangers and to hire soldiers? 35883 Are they not all ministering spirits sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?"
35883Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? 35883 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God?
35883And for what, it may be asked, is all this inhuman sacrifice made?
35883And if God is not the author of all the laws both in the natural and moral world, it may reasonably be inquired, who is?
35883And is it not the duty of all who name the name of Christ to do all in their power to counteract this destroying evil?
35883And is it not the duty of every Christian now to exhibit the same spirit and temper which will be then manifested?
35883And it may be asked, What inhuman hand is the cause of all this sorrow?
35883And shall all our pious forefathers be condemned for engaging in war?
35883And shall he who is not to avenge his own wrongs be instrumental in bringing others into chains, imprisonment, torment, and death?"
35883And what has been the result?
35883And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good?"
35883And why all this sorrow in this poor and needy family?
35883And why is it necessary to inflame the pride of soldiers?
35883And why not animate soldiers by it?
35883Are not his angels swift to do his will?
35883Are not pride, avarice, and revenge the seeds of all kinds of carnal warfare?
35883Are not the hosts of heaven at his command?
35883Are their liberties ever so little endangered as when this spirit is allayed and all its foreign excitements removed?
35883Besides, who could execute the martyrs and be innocent?
35883But do the principles of war lead individuals or nations to pass by offenses and to treat offenders as if they were innocent?
35883But if such is the cruelty to beasts in prosecuting war, what is the cruelty to man, born for immortality?
35883But if they object to his example as a rule of duty in these instances, why not object to his example as a rule of duty in the case of war?
35883But if war is a greater evil than drunkenness, how can Christians remain silent respecting it and be innocent?
35883But shall a highway robber be called an honest man because he takes but half the money of him whom he robs?
35883But what is it to return evil for evil?
35883But what is the practical language of war?
35883But whence has arisen so great a revolution in the minds of the mass of professing Christians on this subject?
35883But which is the greatest evil,--telling a lie, or killing a man?
35883But who would pretend that the governments in heaven and hell are not diametrically opposite?
35883Can fighting be living peaceably with all men?
35883Can it be right for Christians to attempt to defend with hostile weapons the things which they profess but little to regard?
35883Can one who professes the peaceable doctrine of the gospel be a soldier when it is his duty not so much as to go to law?
35883Can the wound now be so easily healed as it could have been before it became thus lacerated and inflamed?
35883Can unbelievers rationally suppose such prayers to be sincere?
35883Dear brethren, is it not high time to come out from the world and be separated?
35883Do nations ever enjoy so much liberty as when most free from the spirit of war?
35883Do not nations that have partially lost their civil liberties gradually regain them in proportion as they continue long without war?
35883Do these scenes generally change the lion into the lamb?
35883Do they not, on the contrary, require justice and exact the very last mite?
35883Does he actually put on bowels of tenderness, mercy, and forgiveness, while he bathes his sword in the blood of his brother?
35883Does he, in fact, so often get into difficulty, quarreling and fighting?
35883Dr. Scott, in his Essay, p. 422:"We ought not therefore to fear our enemies because he will be with us, and if God be for us, who can be against us?
35883Has it the aspect of forgiveness for us, when an enemy trespasses on our rights, to arm with weapons of slaughter and meet him on the field of battle?
35883Has not death always been considered the greatest evil which could be returned for capital crimes?
35883If God be for them, who can be against them?
35883If God be thus for his children, who can be against them?
35883If men invade our rights and trespass upon our privileges, is it forgiveness to repel them at the point of the bayonet?
35883If so, is it not their duty to do all in their power to promote so benevolent an object?
35883If so, what can be more unwise, what more opposite to every dictate of sound wisdom and policy, than the spirit and practice of war?
35883If there is reserved for them an eternal weight of glory, what if they, like their Divine Master, should not have where to lay their heads?
35883If they are hereafter to reign as kings and priests unto God, what if they are not ranked among the great and honorable of the earth?
35883If they are to inherit a crown of immortal glory, what if they are called to suffer the loss of earthly things?
35883Is it an act of mercy, when a man encroaches on your property, to take away his life?
35883Is it because some of the money goes to support war?
35883Is it not a common sentiment that the liberties of a people are in danger when war engrosses their attention?
35883Is it returning good for evil, and overcoming evil with good?
35883Is not Christ as worthy of imitation as the Cæsars and Alexanders of this world?
35883Is not the arm of the Lord powerful to save, and a better defense to all who trust in him than swords and guns?
35883Is not the church covered with darkness and the people with gross darkness?
35883It may be asked, Why were the Jews apprehensive, if all men should believe on him, the Romans would take away both their place and their nation?
35883On the whole, is it not undeniable that peace is favorable to liberty, and that war is its enemy and its ruin?
35883Or who can doubt but he that is in us is greater than he that is in the world?
35883Ought not every individual Christian to conduct in such a manner that if every other person imitated his example it would be best for the whole?
35883Ought they not then to conduct towards each other as brethren of one common Lord?
35883Shall he then fear those who can only kill the body and afterwards have no more that they can do?
35883The question is, How are they limited?
35883The question then is, For what were they taken?
35883Thinkest thou that I can not pray to my Father, and he would presently send me more than twelve legions of angels?"
35883To what a state has sin reduced our world?
35883Was it ever considered that killing a man was doing good to him?
35883We would inquire, If the gospel tolerates war, how will its universal diffusion put a stop to war?
35883What has humanity ever gained by war to counterbalance simply the afflictions of the widow and fatherless?
35883What must be the consequence?
35883Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the winefat?
35883Who amongst our fellow- men would receive the thrust of a sword as an act of kindness?
35883Who can deny that war is altogether a business of strife?
35883Who would receive the thrust of a sword as an act of kindness?
35883Whoever found him unfaithful to his promises or feeble to save?
35883Why may not the gospel forbid war as consistently as it can forbid slavery?
35883Will they not rather conclude that they are perfect mockery?
35883Would he not conclude that either he or they had mistaken the genius of the gospel, or that they believed it to be but a fable?
35883Would it be possible for governments to carry on war if they depended for support on the uncertain opinion of every individual?
35883_ Objection first._ Shall we stand still and suffer an assassin to enter our houses without resistance and let him murder ourselves and families?
35883and what communion hath light with darkness?
35883and what concord hath Christ with Belial?"
35883come they not even of your lusts that war in your members?
35883or does a nation show mercy to another that has actually invaded its rights by falling upon the aggressor and doing all the injury in its power?
35883this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength?
30150But,you ask,"if the evolution of patriotism is inevitable, what have we to do with it?
30150What is that element?
30150And how does war affect these factors?
30150And in the waging of war, do we reckon the direct cost to commerce?
30150And is this but the dream of a visionary?
30150And now, what shall we say of the position of America in this war against war?
30150And why not?
30150Are not the seeds of a new world- loyalty already in our soil?
30150Are not we Americans the people chosen to lift the burden of militarism from off the backs of our downtrodden brother?
30150Are these not the very cases which interested nations are least competent to decide?
30150Are we not still paying unrighteous homage to Mars?
30150Because a man with foreign capital operates ships instead of factories, why is there any special reason for exposing his property to depredation?
30150But are they right?
30150But as he falls on the field of battle, must not all these suffer?
30150But has this obvious condition of affairs affected the race for armaments?
30150But if war so dethrones a nation''s ideals, what may it not do to a nation''s morality?
30150But the great question still remains, How does war affect them?
30150But what of the self- restraint of the nation?
30150But why, I ask, can not this new diplomacy be enforced as American diplomacy has always been enforced?
30150By what divine right does the United States assume the rôle of preserving the world''s peace at the cannon''s mouth?
30150Can the rice growers of Japan profit by killing Americans to whom they sell their produce?
30150Can we expect better of groups than of the individuals of which the groups are composed?
30150Can we expect our regiments to find contentment in the irksome routine of training camp with never a thought of charging the enemy?
30150Can we expect that our skilled gunners will be satisfied to practice, practice always, and never long for human targets?
30150Can we expect to man the seas with fleets of war just for gay parade and cruises around the world?
30150Can you see a military parade without a suggestion of"Dixie"and the Star Spangled Banner, or feeling your bosom swell with patriotic pride?
30150Did the keen mind of our former president really foresee the seizure of some of our territory by England or France?
30150Do the women prate of freedom?
30150Do they still hold out?
30150Do you ask further evidence of the hypocrisy with which our Senate parades our national honor and our vital interests to the undoing of a grand work?
30150Do you know that to maintain our so- called prestige we spend seventy per cent of our national income?
30150Do you say this ideal is impractical?
30150Do you say this is idealism-- visionary?
30150Does Persia yield its banner?
30150Does Thebes resist?
30150Does war make for national greatness?
30150For does it not blunt the sensibilities, harden the heart, inflame the mind with passions, and deaden the consciences of men?
30150Has its voice sounded clear and strong on this world- evil?
30150Has not the Church been too easy?
30150Have they been doing their duty?
30150Have they made it clear that war is sin and war is crime?
30150Honor and vital interests-- could any words be more vague and indefinite?
30150Honor?
30150Honor?
30150Honor?
30150Honor?
30150How about direct peace teaching in the lower schools?
30150How about our churches?
30150How are we going to attack the war problem in order to bring about action, instead of simply talk and discussion?
30150How are we to attack this stupendous problem?
30150How could she gain?
30150How much does this signify?
30150How much of it do we include in the work?
30150How, then, shall we put an end to this useless rivalry of the nations?
30150If Germany annihilated England''s navy to- morrow, how would she profit?
30150If nations can agree to establish war as their arbiter of peace, why can they not establish a more peaceful substitute?
30150If patriotism is the cause of war, how shall we treat the cause to destroy the result?
30150If the child be taught that individuals should arbitrate their differences, can he not learn that the individual nations are subject to the same rule?
30150In civil disputes, why, asks the student, should rifles be employed to discover truth and right?
30150In the teaching of the individual, is it not odd and inconsistent that we forget the teaching of the unit?
30150In view of the present attitude of the social mind, what are we to infer from this as bearing upon the ultimate outcome of international arbitration?
30150In view of these facts, I ask you, What nation has the greatest responsibility for peace?
30150In what state of prosperity and happiness might not France have been had Napoleon never lived?
30150Is it conceivable that the Senate actually feared that our interests would be imperiled by that treaty?
30150Is it merely the fancied perception of an inexistent star?
30150Is it not a fact that one of the most terrible customs of savage men counts among its followers to- day all the nations of the earth?
30150Is it not clear that this traitor to labor, this despoiler of ideals, this foe to morality, is not the benefactor but the destroyer of nations?
30150Is it not painfully manifest that the cost of war constitutes a mighty argument for the economic mind of the student?
30150Is it nothing more than a groundless hope and an alluring vagary?
30150Is it nothing to you?
30150Is it virtue?
30150Is not such an assumption an insult to our neighbors?
30150Is not the trend of patriotism clear?
30150Is not this enough?
30150Is this not a sacrifice essentially pagan in spirit?
30150Is this reasonable?
30150Is war, then, morality?
30150National honor?
30150Now what are the qualities in our men that make the nation great?
30150Recognizing the impotency of appeals to economy and to reason, what are we going to do?
30150Since when has it been true that might makes right, and that peace can be secured only by acting the part of a bully?
30150The statesman, Pericles?
30150The thinker, Plato?
30150Then why do men fight?
30150To such a national summons, how will Texas respond?
30150True, Germany might commit some depredations and hinder the passage of trade, but what would be her motive?
30150War the tonic or war the poison?
30150We are horrified at the report of a single murder, yet, if viewed from the light of truth, what is war but wholesale murder?
30150We have stopped war''s wanton waste of men and treasure; we rejoice in the growing wealth of peace ideals realized"?
30150We must ask: What is patriotism?
30150What about our schools,--not simply the colleges and universities, but all the schools,--which offer fertile ground to sow the seeds of peace?
30150What appeal can we make to the nations that will be strong enough to do away with the war spirit?
30150What are the factors that make for its greatness?
30150What are the forces that have always come to our support against an immorality and a sin?
30150What becomes of national honor then?"
30150What better proof do we need that war is profitless, that it means financial suicide?
30150What else shall we do?
30150What fool will call that preparation for war a guaranty of peace?
30150What hope, then, asks the world, finds the doctrine of peace in the ideals and aspirations of America''s youth to- day?
30150What is it that compels Germany and France to tax themselves until they fairly stagger under the burden of military expenditures?
30150What is national honor?
30150What is our boast of civilization, while we tolerate this devotion of so many men and so much of wealth to war?
30150What is our nation, anyway?
30150What is our waste of war expressed in terms of the wealth of peace?
30150What is to be done?
30150What motive impelled Russia to this heathen conduct?
30150What need of going farther?
30150What now must be our conclusion about war?
30150What place has it in our life?
30150What will the answer be?
30150What, for instance, was the purpose of the founder of this Intercollegiate Peace Association?
30150What, then, are the vital interests that can be conserved only by saber and bullet?
30150What, then, shall be our program?
30150What, then, will we arbitrate?
30150What?
30150When two nations of adjacent territory can not agree over a boundary line, why should settlement be made in terms of physical force?
30150Where did it come from?
30150Where then is the commercial advantage supposed to attend superior military strength?
30150Wherein, then, again asks the world, finds America hope for the future?
30150Who shall presume to declare that this precept was directed not to nations but to individuals only?
30150Who was the ideal ancient patriot?
30150Why are men patriots, anyway, except to save their privileges and their government?
30150Why do men fight?
30150Why do the great powers build so many battleships?
30150Why do we at the same time prepare for war and work for peace?
30150Why should it be enlarged?
30150Why should men limit their loyalty by a row of stones and trees that we call a boundary?
30150Why should the workers of Germany be taxed to support a war against England, Germany''s best market?
30150Why should the workingmen of one country offer themselves as targets for those of another?
30150Why should we meddle with the course of nature?"
30150Why, then, do nations throw away their strength in the building and equipping of armies and navies?
30150Why, then, we ask, do nations make provision for war the first necessity of national life?
30150Will we stop tagging at the heels of Great Britain and Germany and travel this broadening road in which we can be first?
30150Would the mother bird fly away in safety?
30150Yet what could be gained by attempted confiscation?
30150[ 2] Why not the United States?
30150that one man shall not kill, but nations may?
38535Is there a German culture to- day?
38535[ 25] Could a foreign nation say more? 38535 A British critic once put to me what he evidently deemed a poser:Do you urge that we shall be stronger than our enemy, or weaker?"
38535A further illustration: Why should Germany have been sorely disappointed at France''s rapid recovery?
38535Again the question arises: Could a foreign country do more?
38535Again, how would the disappearance of the German navy affect the problem one way or the other?
38535Again, what would be the inevitable result?
38535And by what sort of miracle is she to be able to consume the wheat, because if she can not take the wheat the Canadian can not buy her products?
38535And has Germany escaped a like condemnation?
38535And have not the English, of all people of the world, a most direct interest in aiding the general realization of these truths in Europe?
38535And if they did know, would it be quite a simple matter for the German Government to keep up the game?
38535And the smaller Power says:"What are you going to give us for that tribute?"
38535And were they war?
38535And what avails it to conquer them if they can not be made amenable to force?
38535Are all these factors to leave the national relationship unaffected?
38535Are men less disposed to change their political than their religious opinions?
38535Are not the numberless facts of national interdependence, which I have indicated here, pushing inevitably to that result?
38535Are the axioms set out in the last chapter unchallengeable?
38535Are theories and logic of the slightest use, since force alone can determine the issue?
38535Are you quite sure the other is free?
38535As she passed to the stake she cried to the Queen:"Great Queen, is not your presence able to bring me some comfort under my misery?
38535But did a nation, group, tribe, family, or individual ever yet enter into a war which he did not think just?
38535But does this mean that if one threatens to take my purse, I am not allowed to use force to prevent it?
38535But if we must leave their wealth alone, how can we take it?
38535But is the same in any sense true, despite Admiral Mahan, of the individual of a big State as compared to the individual of a small one?
38535But is this a cause for deprecating the importance of clear understanding?
38535But what do even its defenders say?
38535But what is a further corollary of this situation?
38535But what is the superior armament but the result of superior thought and work?
38535But why should Admiral Fisher suppose that he has a monopoly of courage, and that a German Admiral would act otherwise than he?
38535But why should she want to do so?
38535By enforcing another Frankfurt treaty, by which English ports should be kept open to German goods?
38535By impoverishing its component parts?
38535By the mutual jealousies of those guaranteeing their neutrality?
38535By what sort of miracle is she suddenly to be able to double her industrial population?
38535By what sort of miracle is she suddenly to be able to supply products which have kept forty million people busy?
38535CHAPTER III IS THE POLITICAL REFORMATION POSSIBLE?
38535CHAPTER IV DO THE WARLIKE NATIONS INHERIT THE EARTH?
38535Can one civilized nation gain moral or material advantage by the military conquest of another?
38535Can you preserve your self- respect by summoning him to the police- court?"
38535Could Germany"take"English trade and Colonies by military force?
38535Could any remedy have been devised on the whole as conclusive and complete as that used by the Balkan peoples?
38535Could one imagine such a householder in his right mind committing burglary and murder in order to economize a dollar a week?
38535Could she turn English Colonies into German ones, and win an overseas empire by the sword, as England won hers in the past?
38535DO THE WARLIKE NATIONS INHERIT THE EARTH?
38535Did not someone once say that the war had made Germany great and Germans small?
38535Do not, in short, all the factors show that sheer physical force is losing its prestige as much in the national as in the personal relationship?
38535Do we not here get an illustration of the fact that intangible economic forces are setting at nought the force of arms?
38535Do we not inevitably arrive at the destination to which every road in this discussion leads?
38535Do we place national vanity, for instance, on the same plane as individual vanity?
38535Does Mr. Churchill suppose that these millions know, or think, this struggle one for a mere luxury, or whim?
38535Does a modern nation need to expand its political boundaries in order to provide for increasing population?
38535Does anyone seriously contend that the conditions of modern life have not modified psychology in these matters?
38535Does anyone seriously pretend that the present system of British Colony- holding is due to British philanthropy or high- mindedness?
38535Does anyone think of paying deference to the Russian_ mujik_ because he happens to belong to one of the biggest empires territorially?
38535Does conquered territory add to the wealth of the conquering nation?
38535Does it inspire Europe with any especial respect?
38535Does it mean that Britain shall slay in cold blood sixty or seventy millions of men, women, and children?
38535Does not my critic really see that this whole notion of national possessions benefiting the individual is founded on mystification, upon an illusion?
38535Does that mean that the inferior race is replaced by the superior?
38535Does the Catholic or the Protestant really stand in danger of such things from his religious rival?
38535Does the military prowess of Russia or of Turkey inspire any particular satisfaction in the minds of the individual Russian or of the individual Turk?
38535Does this mean that the nature of these populations has fundamentally altered in less than a generation?
38535Face to face with this manifestation, who is the man bold enough to say that force is never a remedy?
38535Failing such effort and such response, what are we to look for?
38535For what has happened to all attempts to live on extorted tribute?
38535For what is the effect of this increase on the minds of Germans possibly disposed to disagree with Bernhardi?
38535Had we yet arrived at the point at which it was possible to make the matter plain to general opinion?
38535Has not the day gone by when educated men can calmly assume that any Englishman is worth three foreigners?
38535Has such a thing ever happened in the past, when our impulses and"sporting"instincts came into conflict with our larger social and economic interests?
38535Have not the Balkan peoples redeemed War from the charges too readily brought against it as simply an instrument of barbarism?
38535Have not these forces begun already to affect the psychological domain with which we are now especially dealing?
38535Have not we in America the same doctrinal struggle which is going on in France and Germany and Great Britain?
38535Have questions of profit and loss, economic considerations, anything whatever to do with this war?
38535Have they left it unaffected?
38535Have we not already realized the absurdity involved?
38535Have we not had about enough of this ignorant chatter, which is persistently blind to the simplest and most elementary facts of the case?
38535Have we the power to do it?"
38535Having decided on that aim, what utility is there in showing that it is an undesirable one?
38535He adds: Are thieving, and lying, and looting, and bestial talk very bad things?
38535He will ask in triumph,"What will you do if one of your own order openly insults you?
38535How can you have these things if energy is wasted in military adventure?
38535How do we know that these difficulties are doctrinaire ones?
38535How does this distinction affect the practical problem under discussion?
38535How far does such a conception correspond to the reality-- to the German conception?
38535How has it become impossible for one nation to take by conquest the wealth of another for the benefit of the people of the conqueror?
38535How is war going to affect the question one way or another?
38535How long separates us from that scene?
38535How many mines have been transferred from their then owners to the British Government, as the result of British victory?
38535How much tribute does the Government of Westminster exact as the result of investing two hundred and fifty millions in the enterprise?
38535How would Germany impose upon a vanquished England commercial arrangements which would impoverish the vanquished and enrich the victor?
38535How would it benefit her people to do so?
38535How would she treat such a European empire?
38535How, indeed, could it be otherwise?
38535How, therefore, would England''s final crushing of Germany in the military sense change anything?
38535IS THE POLITICAL REFORMATION POSSIBLE?
38535If Germany could conquer England, would any ordinary German subject be the better for it?
38535If it costs England a billion and a quarter to conquer Dutch South Africa, what would it cost Germany to conquer Anglo- Dutch South Africa?
38535If it is asked,"Why does invasion threaten more terrible consequences to us than it does to our neighbors?"
38535If means other than force give the same result more easily, with less effort to ourselves, why discuss the abstract right?
38535If that could be said of the Kotze affair, what shall be said of the state of things which has been revealed by Maximilien Harden among others?
38535If the traders of little nations can snap their fingers at the great war lords, why do British traders need_ Dreadnoughts_?
38535If we can not carry a principle to its logical conclusion, at what point are we to stop?
38535If we have not faith in our own principles, to whom shall we look?
38535In other words, how many shares in the gold- mines does the British Government hold?
38535In that case, what, in the name of all that is muddleheaded, becomes of the"unchanging tendency towards warfare"?
38535In the book to which I have just referred( Mr. Steevens''"With Kitchener to Khartoum") one may read the following: And the Dervishes?
38535In what way are the two attitudes contradictory?
38535In what way can her carrying trade or any other trade be said to depend upon military power?
38535Is England going to protect herself against the commercial"aggression"of Switzerland by building a dozen more_ Dreadnoughts_?
38535Is War impossible?
38535Is it astonishing that the labor of twenty million souls makes some stir in the industrial world?
38535Is it futile?
38535Is it likely that such a process would have the stamp and touch of closeness to real things?
38535Is it not a commonplace that in India, quite as much as in the New World, the trader and the settler drove out the soldier and the conqueror?
38535Is it not a little childish?
38535Is it not time that we shook off the influence of those disastrous words?
38535Is it possible for a nation to"own"the territory of another in the way that a person or corporation would"own"an estate?
38535Is it unlikely?
38535Is it worthy of the_ Spectator_?
38535Is not force a remedy, and at times the only remedy?
38535Is not precisely the same thing taking place with reference to the conflicting conceptions of life which now separate men in Christendom?
38535Is not the failure of Spain explicable by the fact that she failed to realize this truth?
38535Is not war therefore inevitable and must we not prepare diligently for it?
38535Is that the way efficient Germany would set about the development of her newly- acquired Empire?
38535Is there anything in European history-- Cambronne, the Light Brigade, anything you like-- more magnificent than this?
38535Is this serious criticism?
38535It is not a question of Englishmen saying,"Let the German come,"but of the German saying,"Why should we go?"
38535Men are little disposed to listen to reason,"therefore we should not talk reason"--Are men''s ideas immutable?
38535Men are little disposed to listen to reason,"therefore we should not talk reason"--Are men''s ideas immutable?
38535More and more is religious effort being subjected to this test: Does it make for the improvement of society?
38535Moreover, if what"we"write in reviews and books does not touch men''s reasons, does not affect their conduct, why do we write at all?
38535Must they not fight for 1250 million dollars of yearly commerce?"
38535Need it be said that I have not the least desire to deprecate sincere emotion as a factor in progress?
38535Need it be said that the writer of these lines does not desire to represent Germans as a whole as more corrupt than their neighbors?
38535Now the question arises: What more can a navy do that it has not done for England in Canada?
38535Now, do these things constitute, as a national policy, an inspiring aim, or not?
38535Now, how does such hostility as that indicated in this passage differ from the hostility which marks international differences in our day?
38535Of what use is domination unless there be individual capacity, social training, industrial resources, to profit thereby?
38535Or would we urge that to do so is the way to carry on a trade or to govern a nation or that it could be the basis of human relationship?
38535Or, do those who talk of"unchanging human nature"and"thousands of years"really plead that we are in danger of a repetition of such a scene?
38535SYNOPSIS What are the fundamental motives that explain the present rivalry of armaments in Europe, notably the Anglo- German?
38535Suppose she could conquer Switzerland and Belgium with her_ Dreadnoughts_, would not the trade of Switzerland and Belgium go on all the same?
38535Suppose the others reply by increasing their military force?
38535That if he threatens to kill me, I am not to defend myself, because"the individual citizens are not allowed to settle their differences by force"?
38535The reader deems these platitudes beside the mark?
38535Then, when he realizes this truth, shall we not at least have made some progress towards laying the foundations for a sane international polity?
38535Was it the mere hazards of war which gave to Great Britain the domination of India and half of the New World?
38535Was there any doubt as to the reality of the material facts involved?
38535Well, now that England has won the war, how many gold- mines has she captured?
38535Well, what is the result?
38535Were they, and the rank and file, still too enslaved by the hypnotism of an obsolete terminology to accept a new view?
38535What are the facts?
38535What are the facts?
38535What are the facts?
38535What are the motives which each State thus fears its neighbors may obey?
38535What created the police and made them possible, if it was not the general recognition of the fact that disorder and aggression make trade impossible?
38535What do I mean by this sense of collective responsibility?
38535What do we mean when we speak of the money of a nation, or the self- interest of a community?
38535What does the"extinction"of Germany mean?
38535What does this sort of thing mean?
38535What has Pacifism, Old or New, to say now?
38535What has a particularly competent German to say to Mr. Blatchford''s generalization?
38535What has been the precise effect on French prosperity?
38535What has effected this change?
38535What has happened?
38535What interest have we in attempting to prevent her?
38535What is a career of unwarlike ease, in Mr. Roosevelt''s phrase?
38535What is a leader or a ruler in a modern parliamentary sense?
38535What is a market?
38535What is it that France desires in her Colonies?
38535What is it to be"moderately"peaceful, or"moderately"warlike?
38535What is the meaning of this?
38535What is the practical outcome of the situation which the facts detailed in the last chapter make plain?
38535What is the real guarantee of the good behavior of one State to another?
38535What is the real process of war?
38535What is the result?
38535What must inevitably happen if the nations take the line of the"practical man,"and limit their energies simply and purely to piling up armaments?
38535What of the abominable scandals that have marked German military life of late years?
38535What other means have succeeded?
38535What result does this carry?
38535What sort of nature should we expect those savage heroes to display?
38535What then?
38535What was one of the reasons leading to the cessation of religious wars between States?
38535What was the problem confronting the merchant adventurer of the sixteenth century?
38535What was the real origin of the bank crisis of 1907 in the United States, which had for American business men such disastrous consequences?
38535What were the larger motives that pushed England into war with the Dutch Republics?
38535What will become of the strenuous life if you introduce police?
38535What would be its condition if practically not a single ship could leave or enter it?
38535What would be the result of such an action on the part of a German army in London?
38535What would be the situation in Britain, therefore, on the morrow of a conflict in which that country was successful?
38535What would she get, and what would be the result?
38535What would you have had me reply to those Germans?"
38535What, however, is the outcome of spending a billion and a quarter of dollars upon the accomplishment of these objects?
38535What, in short, does the argument of my critics amount to?
38535What, indeed, is modern warfare in its highest phases but this?
38535What, then, is the principle determining the advantageous and the disadvantageous employment of force?
38535What_ do_ these phrases mean?
38535When one nation, say England, occupies a territory, does it mean that that territory is"lost"to Germans?
38535Where would her big industrial population find their markets?
38535Which are the military nations?
38535Which fact constitutes the severer condemnation of the ethical atmosphere of militarism and military training?
38535Which is the more convincing testimony to the corrupting influences of war?
38535Who is the man who is foolish enough to say that martial virtues do not play a vital part in the health and honor of every people?
38535Who realized that in the simple invention of printing there was the liberation of a force greater than the power of kings?
38535Who shall foretell the developments of a generation?
38535Who would invest money in the Transvaal at all if property were to be subject to that sort of shock?
38535Whoever composed epics on typhoid fever or cancer?
38535Why do we overlook the fact that, if Germany has done well in certain social organizations, Scandinavia and Switzerland have done better?
38535Why have I presented the facts in this order, and dealt with the psychological result involved in this change before the change itself?
38535Why is it not given?"
38535Why is the employment of force by the police justified?
38535Why should England forbid Germany to do in a small degree what she has done in a large degree?
38535Why should Germany attack Britain?
38535Why should it be impossible to change that mind on the political side in a generation, or half a generation, when things move so much more quickly?
38535Why should we try to prevent Germany increasing our trade?
38535Why, therefore, should we be asked to entertain for foreigners a sentiment we do not give to our own people?
38535Why?
38535Why?
38535Will you leave everything severely alone, and leave wrong and dangerous ideas in undisturbed possession of the political field?
38535Would Admiral Fisher refrain from taking a given line merely because, if he took it, someone would"hit him in the belly,"etc.?
38535Would England submit tamely if a foreign Government should exercise permanently gross oppression on an important section of her citizens?
38535Would Germany close her own markets to our goods?
38535Would not most of us just as soon be a non- military American as a military Turk?
38535Would not that general realization add immensely to the security of their so- called Empire?
38535Would the demonstration of its economic futility have kept the peace?
38535Would the schoolboy necessarily be more learned or more acute than those judges?
38535Would they urge going to war unnecessarily or unjustly merely because it is good for us?
38535Would those incendiaries be entitled to say that the town authorities were incendiaries also and"believed in setting fire to towns"?
38535Would we not, on the contrary, despise the man who should do so?
38535[ 111] And here is the London_ Times_: No doubt the victor suffers, but who suffers most, he or the vanquished?
38535[ 117] Here is the real English belief in this matter:"Why should Germany attack Britain?
38535[ 117] Why should it be assumed that Germany will do it?
38535[ 121] Does such an experience justify that universal rebelliousness to political rationalism on which my critics for the most part found their case?
38535[ 80] What of the Dreyfus case?
38535[ 92] Is not this a demonstration that in reality physical force is operative in only very narrow limits?
38535[ 97] Do these war advocates urge that war itself is desirable?