Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A658801 sheet([ 1] p.) s.n.,[ London?
A65880eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65839And how plainly hereby Confuted?
A65839And what Idolatry and Diversion from the Spirit doth their Doctrine tend to herein?
A65839Answ, What Faith and Love are these of theirs, which are confirm''d and kept up by Bread and Wine?
A65839What Horrible Blasphemy is it then, to term our crying up the Light and Power of Christ Within, the Wile of Satan, and Cheat of Antichrist?
A65872and not the Scripture, for it is the writing not the light, and if God be the Fountain of lights, from whence did these false l ● ghts come?
A65872s.n.,[ London: 1662?]
A65889and why doest thou subtlely make use of Instruments in this thy wicked work to effect thy treacherous designs?
A65889endeavouring with thy fiery darts and temptations of this nature to turn them against their Maker?
A65889who enviest the heritage of God, why doest thou subtlely present thy self amongst the sons of God to trouble the innocent?
A65841( But, F. B. didst thou so, when a Quaker 25 years?)
A65841Would this be fairly Argued?
A65841s.n.,[ London?, 1701?]
A65841s.n.,[ London?, 1701?]
A65831],[ London?
A65831where is the VVise and Disputers of this VVorld?
A75767How are the children of God taught of God, if it be not by the light of God in the conscience?
A75767How can it be any other then a naturall light which witnesses unto God in that which is holly?
A75767How is Christ the light of the world, and how doth he enlighten every one that comes into the world, if it be not in the Conscience?
A65843But didst thou mean as thou hast spoken?
A65843Priest, And he that is the accuser of the brethren which accuseth them before God day and night, and is not this the works of the Quakers?
A65843R. Baxter, see thy confusion, What, art thou in continual pain and yet lazy?
A65843Then I say, How is Magistracy as truly from God as the Ministry?
A65852And the Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A65852Do you Believe or own Baptism as Essential to Christianity, or necessary to Salvation, and for the Ingrafting us into Christ and His Church?
A65852Do you Believe the Divinity and Humanity of Jesus Christ the Eternal Son of God, or that Jesus Christ is truly God and Man?
A65852Do you believe Remission of Sin, and Redemption through the Sufferings, Death, and Blood of Christ?
A65852Do you believe and expect Salvation, and Justification, by the Righteousness and Merits of Jesus Christ, or by our own Righteousness or Works?
A65852Do you believe and own the Divine Offices of Jesus Christ in his Church?
A65852Do you own the Seals of the New Covenant?
A65852Question, WHat''s your Belief concerning the Blessed Trinity, as our Term is?
A65840And being pulling him down Stairs said, Will you take the Oath of Allegiance?
A65840And to worship him too, Do you not?
A65840Dost thou believe this will cause an adding to thy Church daily, such as shall be saved?
A65840J. C. said, Whither must I go?
A65840John Davis, wilt thou take upon thee to be a Preacher of Righteousness, and put men upon taking away and selling their honest Neighbours Goods?
A65840said J. C. What have I done?
A65895And did not we greatly suffer by them?
A65895Did not the Disciples of Christ for a time go two and two togethe ●?
A65895Is this a ● ufficient Argument against us?
A65895Now if any should have sworn that they had all manner of evil spoken of them, could th ● t be sufficient to prove them guilty of all manner of evil?
A65895Now if the Lord God h ● d not been, and were not on our side, what would become of us?
A35006And how shall any one know what the Meeting requires is according to the Spirit of God, if not by a measure of it in themselves?
A35006But now to give up to the Requirings of others, altho contrary to That; what more like another Gospel?
A35006Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A35006-e540* What more true?
A35006Then how can G. F.& c. excuse themselves, who say, Those that be against Womens Meetings the Universal Spirit can not receive?
A35006What is become of all our Protesting Fore- Fathers, according to your judgment?
A35006Will any Men or Women, or outward written Orders, have greater force than Moses and the Prophets?
A35006You must answer for your selves to God, when it shall be said, Who required these things at your hands?
A65857And then, what will ye do in the day of Visitation and Destruction?
A65857And where will you hide your selves, or flee for refuge in the great day of the Lamb''s Wrath?
A65857Do you do as you would be done by?
A65857Will your joyning hand in hand, or your forces together, secure you from the stroak of Gods Justice?
A65857and where will ye leave your glory?
A65857or what evil consequence they have ever been of, either to the Nation or Govrenment?
A65857to whom will ye flee for help?
A65848and what confusion is it, that men should pretend to a Divine Service, and their Practice and Proceedings contradict it?
A65848have we not been all along a suffering people, and exposed to great sufferings since we were a people, for matters of Religion and Conscience?
A65848or the way to establish a Church or Religion?
A65848wherein we must give account unto God, and answer his Will and not mans; and have we not borne our Suffering patiently without resistance?
A65875The people of Israel committed whoredom with the daughters of Moab, and are there not many of the daughters of England too like to those of Moab?
A65875and should you not have confessed this your great crying, and Land- ruining sin of persecuting and destroying the poor and innocent people of God?
A65875do not these inhumanities, cruelties and oppressions, even pierce the Heavens?
A658861. and not like Samuel, who could challenge all Israel to testifie against him, whose Dr, or whose Asse he had taken, or whom he had oppressed?
A658865. and the Law was added because of transgression: What then?
A65886So, would it have been just or righteous to have persecuted these Christians for meeting in houses, and to have termed their Meetings Conventicles?
A65886Why they have these names, Batchelers of Arts, Masters of Arts, Batchelers of Divinity, Doctors of Divinity?
A65886and so this Grace and Faith is pure,( or else how could it purifie?)
A65886have Infants in the Mother''s womb the Law?
A65886or, are they then capable of the Law that was added because of transgression?
A65886or, at whose hands he had received a gift to blind his eye therewith, and he would have restored it again?
A64451And do you cry ou ● of Popery because of cruelty and persecution?
A64451And will he take up his Tabernacle amongst the sons of men, as he did of old?
A64451And will you be found in the same footsteps, and in the same nature?
A64451David lamented over Abner, and said, Dyed Abner as a fool dyeth?
A64451Did thy Life go out as the snuff of a Candle?
A64451Have you no consideration in you of your latter end?
A64451Or how wil you appear before the righteous God of Heaven and Earth?
A64451Well, hadst thou more to give up then thy Life for the Name of Jesus in this World?
A64451or what covering will you hide yourselves under?
A64451where will a place be found for you in the day of the Lord?
A658622 Can J. N. say''t is the Proper Essence of God precisely taken?
A658623 What is the Seed the Son of Man sows in Mens hearts?
A658629. which must needs be an actual Enlightening; For how can it be said Christ enlightens every Man, but not actually?
A65862And then why may not Christ''s Spiritual Body which came down from Heaven, as well be a Light, as Life, Aliment or Food to the Soul?
A65862But now what ground has J. N. to charge the Quakers with confining the Light within, as to the Act of Illumination, as aforesaid?
A65862How often is the Candle of the wicked put out, how oft is destruction upon him?
A65862How then says Christ himself, I am the Light of the World; I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; No man cometh unto the Father, but by me?
A65862In these three Suppositions, may not I suppose thou leavest no room for Jesus Christ as Mediator, in any degree in Men?
A65862Is not Christ intirely in all respects a Light, as well as all other Spiritual Good to the Soul?
A65862May not R. B. be as easily reconciled about the Light, and the Spiritual Body of Christ, thinkest thou?]
A65862Pray what is it then in Man ▪ that is or may be so bruised wounded, pressed down,& c. as R. B. saith?
A65862The premises( of the whole foregoing matters) seriously considered and compared, where''s the great difference between J. N. and R. B.?
A65862To the Question of his adversary, Had Christ two Bodies?
A65862What Nonsense and Contradiction would this be?
A65862or as truly as the Saints be the light of the World( instrumentally) or Light in the Lord, who enlightens them?
A65855And the Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A65855And was not Paul called a Pestilent Fellow, a Mover of Sedition, a Ring- leader of the Sect of the Nazarines?
A65855Did not the Chief Priests and Pharisees tell People that Christ was a Deceiver, and that he had a Devil?
A65855Do you Believe the Divinity and Humanity of Jesus Christ the Eternal Son of God, or that Jesus Christ is truely God and Man?
A65855Do you believe Remission of Sin, and Redemption through the Sufferings, Death, and Blood of Christ?
A65855Do you believe and expect Salvation, and Justification, by the Righteousness and Merits of Jesus Christ, or by your own Righteousness or Works?
A65855Do you believe and own the Divine Offices of Jesus Christ in his Church?
A65855Do you believe or own Baptism as Essential to Christianity, or necessary to Salvation, and for the Ingrafting us into Christ and His Church?
A65855Do you own the Seals of the New Covenant?
A65855Howbeit, we esteem it very unnecessary to Dispute or Question how the Dead are Raised, or with what Body they come?
A65855WHat''s your Belief concerning the Blessed Trinity, as our Term is?
A65855],[ London?
A65855and did not the Heathens put Wild- beasts Skins upon the Christians to make them appear like Beasts that the Dogs might be stirred up to Devour them?
A65855that is, under pretence of being Deceivers, Deluders, Hereticks, Schismaticks, possessed with the Devil& c.?
A65838And did not all Types Figures, and Shadows end in Christ the substance?
A65838Did you ever hear such a doctrine before, that the baptism of the Spirit is the Spirit?
A65838How poorly do these Baptists Argue for Water Baptism to Continue?
A65838Rep. To this I say, what a silly shift is this, as also what falsehood is in it?
A65838To this I say, besides the falsehood of these two charges upon us, what absurdity is intimated in them?
A65838What falshood and confusion is here?
A65838What is this man but ignorant of the baptism of the Spirit, when you may see here he can not distinguish between the Spirit and the baptism of it?
A65838Where did the Disciples of Christ give the Spirit unto any, seeing it was the work of Christ alone to baptise with the Spirit?
A65838Where provest thou that S. B?
A65838a Teaching Disciple, and 2d ▪ a Teaching Disciple,( what no ● cense is here?)
A65838how Ignorant and full of gross darkness it self art thou S. Bradley?
A65838what confusion and darkness hath this Baptist about this uttered?
A65871And are any Christ''s Ministers who have not his Spirit to Instruct them?
A65871And of what validity is his Work then?
A65871Can it be of dangerous Consequence not to believe a ● ● tter Attainment than Apostates had?
A65871How immoral and unjust is it to upbraid us with a pretended Order from Barbadoes?
A65871Is it so?
A65871Is not the Spirit of Christ Infallible, and the Ministry thereof Infallible?
A65871Or that we are of God, and they that own God will own us, or any who are his Children?
A65871Or to render us as disaffected either to Just Government or Monarchy in General without Exception?
A65871Or what dangerous Consequence in our believing or Testifying that Christ hath given us Discerning and Judgment?
A65871Were these Characters given in general, or to all, other Ministers that are not of us, or not in Society with the Quakers( so called?)
A65871What dangerous Consequence can be in our Knowing or Believing our Election( i. e. in Christ) before the World began?
A65871What in deeming them unsafe and Nonsence, and not to be stood by?
A65871What would be your End?
A65871eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65871is it Just to upbraid us always as a People, and to agravate the same against us as Criminals?
A65871who th ● ● will Credit this Obscure Smiter to be any better than an Old Apostate?
A65871words or challenge?
A65891And how hast thou proved against us as thou sayest, That we would bring all men to believe that the light in every man is God himself?
A65891And what have the people of England given such vast sums of mony and hire to the Priests for, if there were never fewer to walk with God then now?
A65891And where provest thou the word Elohims?
A65891And where provest thou, That though the soul of man be a spirit, yet it perceives not the Nature of Angels, as thou sayest?
A65891Do not the Angels see the face of God continually?
A65891For does not the spirit search all things, yea the deep things of God?
A65891How darkly hast thou here spoken?
A65891Is it not Elohim?
A65891To this I say, is not Elohim God according to thy own confession?
A65891What is it, the Communion with the divine nature thou speaks of before?
A65891What would thou make the people believe that the dumb beast or creature was the deceiver?
A65891Where provest thou that by Scripture?
A65891and seeing thou hast judged all these Churches and professions, what art thou thy self?
A65891and then what good have the Priests done with all their preaching, if they have brought none to walk with God all this time?
A65891and what particular Church or people that is standing dost thou own?
A65891how comes any then truly to believe what is written in the Scripture?
A65891or what is it?
A65891what dost thou own the Church of Rome, seeing thou hast set her against the light within?
A65891what is the Devils motion in God when he moves to lying, and murdering and the like?
A6587741?
A6587748. saith of the Apostles, What were they to preach to them?
A65877And did not Women Preach the Resurrection of Christ, soon after he was risen?
A65877And did not the Apostles preach to turn men to his Light, that one thing in them?
A65877And he saith, How come you to know, who is a Serpent, and who is a Viper?
A65877And shall we be accounted Papists because we are in the Apostles Doctrine, and shew an Example of Moderation and Sobriety to others?
A65877And what if the eternal Spirit never was slain, never had blood to shed( as in M. C. his account?)
A65877Answer, Would any rational man have laid down such an absurdity as this?
A65877For being very plain in our Garments and Apparel, but alas( sayest thou) doth the Power of Humility consist onely in these External things?
A65877He granting that Melchizedech was a Type of Christ, then Christ is the Substance and end of that Type; and must the Type then be Preached up?
A65877I. Touching Ministers Maintenance by Tithes, and whether they be now of Divine right, or no?
A65877If the Law for Tithes be changed, where is the Command of it in force to uphold them now?
A65877So that if you Priests do take Melchizedech for your example, why do you not follow him?
A65877What confusion is this?
A65877What, was that none of the Counsel of God?
A65877What, were the Apostles to preach all things whatsoever, all the Counsel of God, and yet not the Light within?
A65877and had we not better be in plainness of Apparel, then in Cuffs, Ribbonds, and such like Fooleries as many of the Clergy- men wear?
A65877and therefore must our Religion be disapproved of?
A65877doth he suppose them to be in some Purgatory?
A65877or that Stephen did see a visible Body of flesh in Heaven with carnal eyes, as he seems so much to imply?
A65877saith, I would also willingly know, whether the Light of the new Creature, that is in the Saints themselves, be a sufficient Rule to walk by?
A65883( And were not these Martyrs Christians?)
A6588325 Years, account that the Quakers denyed Jesus of Nazareth?
A658836. Who but a Person blinded with Envy, Malice and Folly would have rendred this a denyal of Jesus of Nazareth?
A65883And was it not Jesus of Nazareth whom Saul persecuted in the Primitive Christians?
A65883But we now Query of F. Bugg, wilt thou indeed stand by it pursuant to thy Charge?
A65883Did that Tryal continue from the beginning?
A65883Didst thou F. Bugg contemn the holy Scriptures?
A65883Didst thou F. Bugg disown Magistracy?
A65883Didst thou F. Bugg, when a Quaker, account the Quakers contemned the holy Scriptures?
A65883Didst thou F. Bugg, when a Quaker, account the Quakers disown''d Magistracy?
A65883Didst thou Francis Bugg, when a Quaker, deny Jesus of Nazareth?
A65883Dost thou believe it was practised by the Saints or Primitive Christians in the Apostles d ● ys?
A65883Dost thou believe that it is the Baptism into the Faith, Church, and Kingdom of Christ?
A65883Dost thou in thy Conscience believe Sprinkling Infants to be of divine Institution?
A65883Is it not to deal thy Bread to the Hungry,& c?
A65883Is it such a Fast as I have chosen( saith the Lord) a Day for a Man to afflict his Soul?
A65883Is not this an Imperious and presumptive Dictator to the Government, trow ye?
A65883Or what rational man will be so credulous of his partial and perverse Works against a People whom he hath so grosly defamed and abused?
A65883That those Magistrates and Ministers in O. Cromwell''s days were Christ''s Magistrates and Ministers?
A65883Was this another Jesus Christ than Jesus of Nazareth?
A65883We have not heard the noise of the said Tryal till very lately, how then could that manifest a Spirit of Persecution among us from the beginning?
A65883What great Error was this?
A65883Whether was the Sufferings of Christ, or the Sufferings of the Quakers greatest?
A65883Why?
A65883eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A6589218. if they did not possess his glory, when the riches of the glory of this mystery was Christ in the Saints the hope of glory?
A658924. but I. Horn, in a Paper to me saith, that Jesus hath a humane Body and Soul*(& where does the Scripture say that Christs Soul is humane?
A65892And does not the Book of Common- Prayer call them Priests?
A65892And then why not as well four or five bodies?
A65892Here''s confusion indeed, and where does the Scripture say it is the outward Object and medium of faith?
A65892O unreasonable men, what unreasonable work have you made in these late years in this Nation?
A65892Or are the Scriptures God?
A65892Paul did not the Evil,& c. To which I say, that their words are as much as if they had said, that a sinner sins not; What folly is this?
A65892VVHither are you now run for a refuge and defence for your Tithes and set maintenance?
A65892What is not that which is Spiritual Mistical?
A65892What is the Scriptures without and God one?
A65892What then, hath Christ sin in him if a man be Righteous as Christ is Righteous when he hath sin in him?
A65892What was not these riches the possession in them too?
A65892and stirred up wars against them, till all hath been as heaps by your means?
A65892doth all your old grounds fail you that formerly you have pleaded?
A65892how have you cursed the great ones that was over you, when they would not serve your turn?
A65892what begging and petitioning have you made to every severall power, to enlarge your benefits?
A65892what sueing and casting in prisons of poor people?
A658429. who can say I have made my heart clean?
A65842And shall the flesh and bones be redeemed and delivered from corruption, and shall not the blood?
A65842And to our question which was, whether the light that lighteth every man, be a natural light, or a spiritual light?
A65842And we ask you what duties( or any things that are duties) doth Sathan press men to?
A65842And what is become of his blood?
A65842And what is it that hinders the blood, that it may not enter into Gods Kingdom as well as the flesh and bones, which ye say may?
A65842And where do the Scriptures say, That flesh and bones may in herit the Kingdom of God?
A65842Ans Was there ever the like confusion and falshood uttere''d, as these men do appear in?
A65842But how shall any that are ignorant believe them, or be instructed with their confusion?
A65842For although the Lord doth what he please, yet, doth he do any thing without a Cause?
A65842Here again they have guessed, and thought above that which is written, and how can blood be turned into spirits and the substance of it remaining?
A65842Is the transgression of the blood greater then the transgression of the flesh and bones?
A65842Now we ask them if they believe that there was no blood left in Christs body when he was crucified?
A65842What is the Cause?
A65842Why do you rage so against Gods Judgment?
A65842and is not every sin deceit, and deceit Guile?
A65842let them prove some sin which was not destroyed in any of these before their decease,( and who can lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect?)
A65842or what reason is there that his blood should be altered more then his flesh and bones?
A65842that then his body being spiritualized, it glided in at the key- hole of the door?
A60564All Clergie- men as Limbs of Antichrist?
A60564And how then comes it to passe that you think a Tinker or mean ignorant person can serve here?
A60564Are there not a thousand dangers, and a million of difficulties and innumerable possibilities of miscarriage?
A60564Are they not ready to cry down Faith for a fancy?
A60564But then, I beseech you, do you beleeve your immortall soul( for which Jesus laid down his precious bloud) the only triflle and toy about you?
A60564But you pretend to be an Embassadour of Christ, and have no,& c. W. Did ever any Heretick pretend a commission from Christ?
A60564Do they not cry that Sacraments are needless, meer empty Ceremonies?
A60564F. What do you mean by three hee s?
A60564He puts the question, as if he should say, what man in his wits can think it lawfull?
A60564Here S. gave him the Book to look on: and then askt him whether he were the Author of that Book or not?
A60564I might charge you with many Popish Doctrines; but now I only ask whether you will take the oath of abjuration, or deny one of my propositions?
A60564In such a case would you not say that these 11 are Knaves?
A60564Major or minor?
A60564Paul and Barnabas, the sons of the Prophets, Bablers?
A60564Preaching Foolishness?
A60564S. I would fain give you an argument that you should like, are you three Persons who dispute against me this day, or are you not?
A60564S. What do you deny?
A60564S. What do you deny?
A60564S. What do you deny?
A60564S. What then?
A60564Then askt whether any more of that party had ought else to say?
A60564W, Is the word Witch there?
A60564W. But did the Hereticks live good lives?
A60564Were you the Author of all that is printed in this Book?
A60564What do you answer to the argument?
A60564What do you answer?
A60564Why then replied the other, who made the Bee which is somewhat bigger, and hath a sting?
A60564Would you not say that these three Angels were three Persons?
A60564at length he demanded what were the particular sins which I confessed to Almighty God when I last received the body and blood of Iesus Christ?
A60564how shall they preach unles they be sent?
A60564what were the signes?)
A60564who that hath read one leafe either of the law or Gospell?
A4715622. thou says of Christ who was never defiled, having the iniquities of us all in h ● s body& c. how unsound are thy words?
A47156And is it no ▪ perfection they have wa ● ted and travelled, to be ● e ● ewed into the image of the heavenly?
A47156And now does thou know what thou speakes?
A47156But did thou ever read or hear from any of us, as if we counted the blood of Christ, even in the outward, as the blood of any ordinary man, or beast?
A47156But first, Were the Saints made the righteousness of God in Christ, without any inward qualification or work of his light or spirit?
A47156But for whom doth R. G. reckon?
A47156For first, if all things be already wrought in the crurified body, what doth he interceed for?
A47156How has thy prejudice blinded thee in this and many other things?
A47156In the same page thou says: if in every man this seed or Christ is not saved: doeth it remain for ever under condemnation?
A47156R. G. God said to Adam, in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt die( it could not be revoked) who could fulfil the requirings of Wrath and satisfie?
A47156See his manifest contradictions: How is sin and transgression finished and made an end of without man, while no good is wrought in them?
A47156To this he thus answers; To this spirit, I say, who art thou that thus a ● gues with God?
A47156and is not their faith their victory over sin and death?
A47156are they not members of Christ?
A47156doth it remain for ever in some under condemnation?
A47156for surely sin can not live in any measure ▪ where it finde ● no entertainment?
A47156owns his doctrine herein?)
A47156whether art thou driven?
A47156who could have answered the requirings of love, and fulfil the requirings of wrath that would hold man captive in death, and yet satisfie both?
A65861And which was Worse, think you, Paul Hobson the Deceiver, or the Person whom he Deceived?
A65861And who was this Paul Hobson?
A65861And why must the Wisest of the Heathen be Excluded from the Sufficiency of such an Obligation or Rule, as Man was always under?
A65861Are they No Men?
A65861But if there be no such thing, as a Real Light, to Distinguish between Sin and Duty, what should they be Accountable for?
A65861Canst not see his Self- Confutation herein?
A65861Did Christ Dye for all men?
A65861Do not these men count the Scriptures the great Rule of Speaking also?
A65861Doth the Light of Christ Oppose Christ?
A65861Doth thy Brother Hicks credit your Cause in these manifest Contradictions?
A65861Hath not thy Brother Hicks shewn Intollerable Pride, Madness, and his Gross Darkness against this Light Within?
A65861How Narrow and Partial are they who Deny this?
A65861How could you call the Light within Christ, if some Scriptures had not mention''d Christ in you, and that he is the Life and Light of Men?
A65861Is not Christ Sufficient?
A65861Is not this to make the Light of Christ Oppose Christ?
A65861Is this a Valid Argument against Revelation?
A65861Kiffin?
A65861Man was formed of the Dust of the Earth; What, must the Dust of Dissolved Bodies be rais''d, without Creating a New?
A65861Reader, What Harmony can be found in this Man''s Scribling?
A65861See here again the Contradiction that''s between these two Brothers: Can that be a Wile of Satan which thus Checks for Evil and Excites to Good?
A65861T. H. What Intollerable Pride and Arrogancy have you arived to?
A65861Then by what Rule must we believe that the Scriptures are the only Rule of Faith and Practice, while they no where do call themselves so?
A65861Was he not an Eminent Baptist Preacher, and Brother of these Men?
A65861What Blasphemous Opposition against Christ is this man guilty of?
A65861What thinkest thou, William Kiffin?
A65861Where do the Apostles say these words in Scripture?
A65861Why wouldst thou suffer such a Contradictory Pamphlet, as this thy Brother''s Dialogue, to be divulged?
A65861and have they no Souls to be Saved?
A65861or, Is he a Propitiation for the Sins of the whole World?
A65861or, Must they all be Damned for Want of the Scriptures( who have them not) if they improve so much Light as God hath given them?
A65861whereto doth the Best of Men''s Actions naturally tend, but to Swell them with Pride and Conceit of themselves?
A6589012, as namely, to be Angry and Waspish, and therein to reflect upon Persons?
A658907?
A65890And what Evasions and Shufflings is here?
A65890And what if God will not bestow such Gifts and Signs now, must we therefore be no Christians?
A65890And when did we ever tell thee, That we would have thee guided by our Sufferings meerly?
A65890But is this a Truth in it self, yea or Nay?
A65890Dost thou so?
A65890From all which he infers, What if God will not bestow such Gifts now, must we therefore be no Christians?
A65890Hast thou not bewrayed thy own Equivocation, and that the Author''s Name is not Thomas Thompson?
A65890He concludes, That this Interrogation absolutely destroyes my own Cause, and answers my self in all I writ, Argumentum ad hominem: and why so?
A65890He denyes not all Figures, he sayes; Why does he quarrel then?
A65890Here thou art a very silly Quibbler: Did we ever say, That Christ ended Figurative Speeches, when he so much used them?
A65890Herein thou pervertest: But hast thou not formerly perceived something of Religion and Christianity, as the Ground of our giving up to suffer?
A65890How easie is it for a Scoffer to fill Books witk such Frothy Stuff?
A65890Is it all devoured with Lightness, and turned into Scorn?
A65890Is this all one with forging Lyes and Ridiculous Stuff in other men''s Names?
A65890Is this thy Rhetorick?
A65890Or did he speak it with Reflection upon them who make or render the Scriptures no better then a Nose of Wax by their own various Interpretations?
A65890Thou art here very positive in thy Charge, which indeed is a Charge of a high Nature; But hast thou dealt honestly or truly in this?
A65890Thou sayest, The Quakers have excluded themselves from using of Figures: Why so?
A65890Very like so; how should they?
A65890Was it S. F''s positive Assertion concerning the Scriptures themselves?
A65890What is then become of thy Cause?
A65890What sorry Shuffling art thou fain to make use of?
A65890What, not spare an Hour''s Time to discourse or examine thy own Injuries and yet can take many Hours to write Pamphlets thereof against us?
A65890Wilt thou grace thy Cause by such Rhetorick, thinkest thou?
A65859& c. But did he say, Arise and come forth to Fight, Cut and Slash as F. B. confidently inferred, and told the Meeting at Mildenhall aforesaid?
A658592dly, For what end could he therein turn Informer to obtain the Warrant?
A65859And art not thou Joyned to such as say Prophecying and immediate Revelation are Ceased?
A65859And is this thy Affection and Friendship to the King and Queen?
A65859And that they did so Encourage them then in the Present Tense, and Future Tense( as he saith) Did not G. F. say to O. C. Arise and come forth?
A65859Dost thou now disown what thou hast writ in Commendation of the People called Quakers in 1686?
A65859Encourage O. C.''s Army to a Practise they believed was not Lawful, i. e. to Fight; how proves he this?
A65859F. B. I will not suffer you to Preach here; Constable, Constable, where is your Warrant?
A65859F. B. Thou art for evading, and going into Holes and Corners, but I am glad I have got thee here, dost thou own this Book?
A65859F. B. refused, and then asked if he would own certain Books which he had?
A65859G. W. Dost thou really believe that F. Bugg was as Innocent as a Dove in his Dealing, as he did by Samuel Cater?
A65859G. W. How provest thou that?
A65859G. W. Is not my Name to it?
A65859G. W. See what a Convert thou hast gotten of him, he will not be subject to his own Minister: Dost thou not think him somewhat Discomposed?
A65859G. W. The Question in Controversy between us is, Whether the People called Quakers he Apostate from the Truth, or F. Bugg?
A65859G. W. Then he was of two different Judgments since he was Conformed to the Church of England: Come F. Bugg, what sayst thou?
A65859G. W. What are their Titles?
A65859How proves he they are theirs as Cited,& c?
A65859May not we pray acceptably, unless we tell God the Name of those we pray for?
A65859Or charged as Offenders, for not Naming Persons in our Prayers?
A65859Prayer ended, F. Bugg began Disturbance again, saying, do you own these Books, this, and this?
A65859We grant''t is our Christian Duty to Pray for all Men, for Kings,& c. But where are all required by Christ or his Apostles, to pray for them by Name?
A65859What Doctrin agreed upon and generally held by the blessed Martyrs, did G. W. ever so Accuse?
A65859What need''st thou question my owning it?
A65859Wherein doth he accuse the blessed Martyrs, and charge their Doctrin to be Corrupt?
A65859Whitehead, and Execute his Warrant, as( Persecuter- like) he divers times did?
A65859a Deceiver of the People in point of Doctrin or Conversation?
A65859and this Book,& c.?
A65859eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65859was it only to secure himself from being thrust out of our Meeting?
A65859— How agrees this with his now confessing that in the beginning they were apt to teach, not given to filthy Lucre, not willing to be Chargeable?
A6583611. may not be covered with a Hat off, and uncovered with a Hat on?
A658362dly, Is it so dangerous, that this Church( or universal Body of Christ) can not err?
A658362ly, Who those of the Pople called Quakers that have assumed to impose, contratry to their former Testimonies, as he saith?
A65836And that we have it to guide and give discovery in the weighty matters of Faith and Salvation, and to try Spirits, whether they be of God or no?
A65836And what are those peculiar Revelations or Motions?
A65836Doth not the spiritual Man judge all Things?
A65836Have not some kneeled, sat, and stood in publick ▪& c. Whether a Cap is not as real a Covering to the Head as a Hat?
A65836How now William, Is this thy tender Conscience, Moderation, Love and Charity professed towards the People of God called Quakers?
A65836How should he know his Requiring, for that which he is prejudicially engaged against?
A65836If it must needs be accounted dangerous to assert this?
A65836Is it a limitting the Lord for the Body or Church of Christ to have his Spirit which is infallible?
A65836Oh Treacherous Apostate, Judas the Lord Rebuke thee] But what are those Romish positions?
A65836Oh how sadly hath this Opposer violated his own Conscience, perverted the right Wayes of God, and abused the pretious Testimony of Truth?
A65836Oh what confused Work doth this man make?
A65836Or did we ever place it upon human Understanding, as meer Men, but upon that divine Understanding that God giveth?
A65836Or is the whole Church or Body which he confesseth Christ to be the Head of, in such an Exaltation over the lowly ones?
A65836Or to upbraid any with what is past, that have repented, received Mercy and Forgiveness from the Lord?
A65836What gross Darkness is come over this Man?
A65836Would he be so dealt by?
A65836and an unerring Judgment so far as we received from the same Spirit?
A65836or J. Pennyman with his Motion to have the Bible and Testimonies of Martyrs, with other good Books to the Exchange in order to burn?
A65836when demonstrated?
A65836who then are those lowly Ones that are not of the Church?
A65864* And who saith he doth?
A65864* Where hath he a Scripture for God''s Teaching in Person?
A65864And did not several Gifts flow from one Spirit?
A65864And does not he then teach us by himself immediately?
A65864And how could they be such if the Light did not teach them, both to know, believe and practise what is necessary to Salvation?
A65864And if this Light, they were to be turned to, was not also within in some Degree, and that in an immediate VVay?
A65864And is not this Grace and good Spirit Immediate, when it operates in the Hearts?
A65864And is not this then in order to Salvation?
A65864And of whom do their Teachers learn, and receive the Understanding of the Scriptures?
A65864And when did we ever say, that he was in this Sense in all men, that is, as ruling,& c. or to dwell in the Hearts of all men by Faith?
A65864And why so?
A65864And why so?
A65864Doth he not here judge?
A65864He should have told, whether he believes that the common Christians( as he calls them) were inspired with any Truths necessary to Salvation?
A65864If they obey what God expects from them, shall they not be saved?
A65864Is not the Father, Son and Holy Spirit one Being, though different as to Relation and Degrees of Manifestation?
A65864Is not this a plain Confession to the Immediateness of Christ''s In- dwelling in us?
A65864Is there any Virtue in Christ''s Presence, that is not in God''s Presence?
A65864Now I ask; If this Darkness was not within, that they were to be turned from?
A65864Or did it abide in them, not to speak to them in the Absence of the Apostles and their Epistles, but only in their Presence?
A65864Or was it only a Witness or Evidence to what they spoke or preacht?
A65864That God''s essential Presence should be in all men, and yet not Christ''s virtual Presence: VVhat Scripture hath he for these Words?
A65864Was it not the Anointing?
A65864We have also more sure Dark Prophecies under the Old Covenant, whereunto ye do well that ye take heed( And what then is not so sure as they?)
A65864What a strange Limitation would this be, that indeed endeavours to stop the Mouth of the Anointing?
A65864What''s now the Matter, this man appears so envious and reviling?
A65864and in what Capacity is his Soul before he either know the Scriptures, or have man''s Teaching?
A65864where is the Incongruity?
A65878And did not Paul use the word Thee to King Agrippa?
A65878And did not the Prophet Nathan say to King David, Thou art the man?
A65878And doth not the Lyturgy of the Church of England allow of the Holy Scriptures of Truth, and the Example of the primitive Christians therein recorded?
A65878And how long wilt Thou refuse to humble thy self before me?
A65878And how will such cruel work compose the spirits of the People of this Nation?
A65878And then must the Gentiles in those Countries be unpreached to, uncalled and unconverted till such Houses are built and dedicated?
A65878And what colour or pretence of Religious Exercise hast thou, to inform against these harmless silent Meetings?
A65878And what plotting or contriving hast thou ever heard or seen in any such Meetings, or in any of our Meetings, tending to set the City on flames?
A65878And when and where did we ever declare our selves at freedom to forswear the Christian Faith?
A65878Is Thou and Thee such bad dishonourable Language?
A65878Is not this an envious insinuation of thy own head and wicked heart, to make us odious?
A65878Now let the moderate Reader judge, whether this Testimony of ours be seditious yea or nay, as this false Informer hath accused it?
A65878What antick tricks thou Slanderer and Scoffer?
A65878What danger hath this man seen in any of our Meetings, either small or great?
A65878Where is the colour or pretence?
A65878Who are to be marked as Enemies to Christianity?
A65878Why dost thou then use thee and thou to God in thy Prayers( if thou hast so much Religion to pray at all?)
A65878],[ London?
A65878and can any reasonably confine it only to Reading Confessions of sins, and Prayers?
A65878and doth not the word Liturgy of the Church, signifie, The publick Work, Action, or Service of the Church?
A65878and how are Offerings ended under the Gospel?
A65878and was not that Temple a Figure?
A65878and what exercise provest thou therein, that the Act takes hold of?
A65878are they Steeple- houses, which were dedicated for the Mass?
A65878but, can he think that in every Country where the Gentiles are called in, there must of necessity be such places or Mass- houses?
A65878doth he think to make up a good Church or a compleat Body, by driving men with force and cruelty into his way and worship?
A65878for is there not both a Prayer before Sermon, and Preaching also used in the Church, which are not particularly recorded in the Common- Prayer- Book?
A65878has not he herein accused the Church of England?
A65878or endeavour and seek to set such a Mark upon them meerly for their Principle or difference in Judgment and Opinions?
A65878or must the poor Ministers of Christ forbear to go into those Nations, to preach where there are no such consecrated by Pope or Bishop?
A65878then what Church doth he belong to?
A65878we challenge him, and all such malicious Informers in the World, to prove any danger or hurt by us in our Meetings?
A65878were these the Houses which he saith God put into their heart to build him?
A65878where is then the difference between Law and Gospel?
A65844And is not he himself guilty of the same?
A65844And must not we walk in him the New and Living Way, and obey his Commands?
A65844And were not this most grosly to charge Paul with Transgression both of Law and Gospel?
A65844And what is this to the Imposition of Oaths we desired the Parliament to remove?
A65844But when have we refused to pay our Civil- Duties or Taxes, being in a Capacity, that is, out of Bonds and Sufferings, which have disabled many?
A65844But why makes this man such a Difference between the Good Fortune of Caesar, or Caesar''s Prosperity?
A65844Could not he swallow such Camel- Oaths where he allows the use of such Forms, as Swearing by Heaven;& c. because Gods Name is implyed?
A65844Could our Consciences serve us to Conform, Pay Tythes, Uphold Priests,& c. what needed we make Address for Liberty?
A65844Did he therein call them to swear, in saying, If they would testifie?
A65844Neither do we read that the Authors say, That that Charge was denyed by them; and then, what need was there of proving it before it was denyed?
A65844No, said the Bishop, and why?
A65844Secondly, Neither is Swearing by the Health of the Emperor any more warrantable; And did not both these Oaths savour of Heathenism?
A65844Then said the Bishop, Why wilt thou not Swear before a Judge,& c?
A65844This makes for us; for were not promissory Oaths as well as assertory allowed under the Law?
A65844To Swear by Heaven or Jerusalem are Camel- Oaths: What Credit can this man''s Work against us be of?
A65844VVill any presume to say, That he Swore by the Heap of Stones, which was a Witness or a Memorial?
A65844We may ask this, J. S. Where are thy Eyes?
A65844What Evil then is it to swear?
A65844Where is your Conscience, who belye so many,& c?
A65844],[ London?
A65844and why are men put upon Swearing in their Account for their Tyths, more then in their private Contracts about them?
A65844and yet would not swear but by the God of Truth: Was there no Difference between the Health of a Wicked Persecuting Emperor, and the God of Truth?
A65844or where ever he acknowledg''d himself convinc''d that this was an Error?
A65896And shall we sin because we are not under the Law, but under Grace?
A65896And what doth God by his Spirit work in those that are chosen?
A65896And what more can we desire of Perfection, then is here granted?
A65896And why should any contend or arg ● e for the contrary End?
A65896Animad Why then should we fall short of our Duty, or of Perfect Obedience?
A65896Can we desire better Help then that of the Spirit?
A65896Doth he not give this Testimony of them?
A65896He cites Augustine de Spiritu et Littera, that he saith, Alia est Questio, utrumaesse possit Homo in hac Vita sine Peccato, alia, utrum sit?
A65896How can that be?
A65896Is it not our Duty to fulfil the Condition?
A65896It is one Question whether it be possible for a Man to attain to such a Perfection as to live without Sin?
A65896Must we so?
A65896Not?
A65896Shall any charge God''s Elect, or condemn his Chosen and Faithful Ones with Unwillingness to serve their so Gracious Lord and Master?
A65896That''s strange; is not the Spirit given to lead us into all Truth?
A65896The Questions therefore is, whether God''s Elect be chargeable with any Thing that is condemnable?
A65896Where can there be a Place for Disobedience to remaine?
A65896Whether he that failes in the least of what is his Duty, doth not sin?
A65896Whether that Degree of Holiness, which is attained by any Man, is not the Duty of every Man?
A65896Why are we then so much opposed and striven with?
A65896Why then must Sin have any Place of Continuance?
A65896Without what Condition that which was required of us by the first Law, or Law of our first Creation?
A65896and another, whether there be any that do?
A65896and do we yet fail in our Duty whilest we fulfil it?
A65896can this either consist with a State of Grace, or their Sincerity?
A65896doth not God hear the Prayers, and grant the Requests of the Upright?
A65896either for holding this Perfection, or that some Men sin not, which we see not consistant with[ no Man but sins] The Scriptures say both; what?
A65896how should that be?
A65896or how are his People a willing People in the Day of his Power?
A65896shall God''s Children( by the Grace) either have Dominion or Power over Sin, and yet suffer Sin alwayes to have any Being or Prevalency in them?
A65896throughly to sanctifie, justifie,& c?
A65896what then shall become of the Generàtion of the most just?
A65896who shall lay any thing to the Charge of God''s Elect?
A71239& c. What do not they that rise with Christ rise from the dead?
A71239And are not they that are joyned to God one spirit?
A71239And did not Saint Paul travel till Christ was formed in the Galathians?
A71239And if not so saved, shall it not Eternally be under a sence of his Anger?
A71239And was not man made in the Image of God, and had the Breath of Life from God in him whereby his Soul lived?
A71239And was not that the Resurrection from the dead that Saint Paul desired to attain to?
A71239And what Seed is that is raised in incorruption, Glory and Power, but the Seed of God?
A71239And what was it in the rich man then that let him see Abraham and Lazarus a far off?
A71239And when did they demolish Bell, Book and Candle, and Popish Hierarchy, and pull down Popish Crosses and Crucifixes?
A71239And where he is manifested in that Power in his Saints, may he not speak thorow them to his own in others where manifest in a less measure?
A71239And where proves J. W. that outward Baptism in Water does signifie or resemble Christs death, burial, or Resurrection, as he hath implyed?
A71239And whereas J. W. saith, Is not the Truth exprest in the Scriptures eternal and incorruptible?
A71239And why is the Spirit a distinct thing from the flesh, and a body without the Spirit dead?
A71239Are not all men in sin dead?
A71239Are these the fruits of the Baptists spirit?
A71239Canst thou not distinguish betwixt that which is Humane( or from the earth) and a quickening Spirit?
A71239Did he see them when he was in Hell with bodily eyes, yea or nay?
A71239For is it not sin that caused the imperfection?
A71239For shall not the Bodies of the Just return to dust, who are redeemed from Transgression and washed from sin by the Blood of Christ?
A71239For shall not the Soul if saved from the power of sin, be eternally in the feeling and enjoyment of the Love of God?
A71239How then are any justified while they are in the filth of the world in their sins and in their blood?
A71239How then hath it its immortality?
A71239If they be of one substance then must the soul dye with the body, and then where is its immortality?
A71239Is God in his People and his Nature divided?
A71239Is any thing immortal that hath not of the Divine Life or nature in it?
A71239Must not all things return to their Center?
A71239Or hath he two Souls in one body or person of such differing kinds?
A71239Was not that Image and Life Immortal?
A71239Was the Apostle Paul a deceiver for speaking these things( supposeth J. W?)
A71239What cruelty exercised?
A71239What gross absurdity hast thou herein implyed?
A71239What reproaches and slanders uttered?
A71239What was that death that Adam dyed in the day he eat of the forbidden fruit, seeing that his Body lived hundreds of years after that?
A71239What, is humane and immortal both one?
A71239What, was not the old World as wicked as the World now is, or is the Grace of God or his Mercy now, lesse then it was to the old World?
A71239Why doth not every one of the Christians go up and down Preaching as well as some few of you Apostles?
A71239and can that state be attained by any, and nothing of the Divine Nature be in them?
A71239and what lesse then an Almighty hand hath preserved that Book?
A71239else whence had the Soul its Life and Immortality, and what is it in it self?
A71239how art thou confounded in thy malicious accusations, which confusion is a fruit of thy envy?
A71239should the Prophets mouths have been stopt when they Prophesied to the Seed?
A71239that Christ Preached to the Spirits when they were in Prison?
A71239to Query What part of man is it which is capable of being beheaded; Is it not the Body?
A71239which are the same things we speak, though he count us D ● ceivers, and is not this seed or spirit which is Christ, in them that believe?
A6588529. some may inquire when this should be fulfilled, and when this Kingdom should come to Saints and true Believers in Christ?
A65885And herein we plainly tell the World the plain Truth, according to Holy Scripture, And what Venom is in this pray?
A65885And how will they prove this Breaking of Bread only to be the Lord''s Supper?
A65885And if without Christ we can do nothing, How should any Man either know God, depend upon him, be subject to him, or love him without Christ?
A65885And is not that Seed Christ?
A65885And is not the Word of Faith, Christ in Spirit?
A65885And the Bread, which we break, Is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A65885And thou sowest not that Body that shall be: Whom shall we believe in this case, the Apostle or this Priest?
A65885And what greater Sanction can this Man suppose or place, upon what he calls the Lord''s Supper?
A65885And where do they so much as imitate those Primitive Believers, in breaking Bread from House to House?
A65885Answer 1st, Where do we say all this of our selves, as that we believe our selves to be perfect as God?
A65885As to what is objected against G. W''s Questions; Is it( i. e. the Glory of God) visible to the Carnal Eye?
A65885Behold Israel after the Flesh: Are not they which eat of the Sacrifices partakers of the Altar?
A65885But how many Infants( who are Sprinkled) can they prove, are thus first qualified by the Inward Baptism of the Spirit?
A65885But not being content with this our Confession, he begs this Question, i. e. But if not Three Persons, what Three are they?
A65885Did Christ mean Litterally herein?
A65885Do you believe Remission of Sin, and Redemption through the Sufferings, Death and Blood of Christ?
A65885Do you believe and own the Divine Offices of Jesus Christ in his Church?
A65885Do you believe or own Baptism, as Essential to Christianity, or necessary to Salvation; and for the ingrafting us into Christ and his Church?
A65885Do you believe the Doctrine of the Resurrection from the Dead, and of Eternal Judgment, and the Immortality of the Soul?
A65885Hast thou better, clearer, and more lasting Eyes of Flesh than all other Men?
A65885How canst thou expect to see him with thy Carnal or Fleshly Eye?
A65885How could they drink thereof, if they had no Faith therein?
A65885How often have we confess''d him as such?
A65885How shall they be the same in Substance, without Flesh, Blood and Bones?
A65885How will this Priest and G. K. reconcile themselves in this Point, of the Sameness of Bodies?
A65885I would ask this Rector, Doest thou expect to see this Glorious coming of Christ from Heaven, with thy carnal Eyes thou now hast?
A65885I would ask this Rector, whether he has seen these very Words in the place quoted?
A65885If the Celestial Bodies, and the Bodies Terrestrial, be one and the same Bodies?
A65885If the Spiritual Body, and the Natural Body, be one and the same Numerical Body?
A65885If thou neglectest his Inward and Spiritual Appearance and Work, mayest thou not neglect thy own Salvation thereby?
A65885May we take, what our Opposer here adds, for Answer?
A65885Men or Babes?
A65885No: What was it good for then?
A65885Now I ask these Men, 1st, If the first Adam, and the last Adam, were one and the same Adam?
A65885Now could this be to deny either the Divinity or Manhood of Christ?
A65885Now where''s the Venom charged in all this Doctrine?
A65885Or any Opposition to our Profession before mentioned?
A65885Or deny it to be a Type or Figure, by deeming us Horrid Impostors, for asserting, the outward Supper to be Typical?
A65885Or how doth that Seed remain in him that''s born again?
A65885Or if he has ever read the said Lawson''s Threefold State of Anti- christ?
A65885The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A65885The Cup of Blessing, which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A65885Thus the Apostle uses the same distinction between the Natural Body and the Spiritual Body, Where does he say, They are both one and the same Body?
A65885We want proof for this Assertion, How could they love God, and be subject to him, and depend upon him, and hate or oppose his dear Son and Servants?
A65885What carping and picking work do these Men make against us, to make us Offenders for a word?
A65885What confused and bewildred work do we meet withal from some angry Opposers?
A65885What is understood by the Term Christianity, or what is necessary( in a strict and proper Sense) to entitle a Man to be a Christian?
A65885What shall be their Substance or Essence, when they shall be no more Bodies of Flesh, Blood and Bones?
A65885When true and full Recitations are given of our Words, how plain does the Truth thereof appear?
A65885Where did ever any honest sober Gentiles or Heathen, who truly loved God, so vehemently oppose Christ, as this Man accuseth them?
A65885Where doth the Scripture say, That the shedding of Christ''s Blood outwardly, was the meritorious cause of( Man''s) Salvation?
A65885Where have we so said, or argued?
A65885Where is the Insincerity or gross Perversion in all these words recited by the Rector?
A65885Who is that Blessed Man to whom God imputeth Righteousness,& c?
A65869''T is well he grants we own that Christ, what other Christ would he have us own?
A65869And can he think himself secure from having his Insolency therein, in time further take notice of?
A65869And did he not speak of the Ministration of Death Written?
A65869And did not the Holy Apostle say, The Letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth Life?
A65869And how was my Vnderstanding darkened by their Sleights for many years?
A65869And in that day, how did our Harmony sound in our Assembly?
A65869And then who will credit thy Scribling?
A65869And to his saying, the names Jesus and Christ, are given to the Mediator,& c.[ True, but what follows?]
A65869And why is he offended then?
A65869And why so?
A65869Are there not Carnal Ordinances, and Washing mentioned in Scripture?
A65869But I ask, was Jesus Christ the Word, and Son of God, before he took the Body?
A65869But pray does he therein befriend the Protestant interest, or Government either?
A65869But what if I. P. said, he could not call the bodily Garment or Vail Christ?
A65869But who were these names given to?
A65869Did Paul name those of Corinth, whom he charges with Strife and Devision,& c. and therefore Carnal?
A65869Did not the Apostle say, he consecrated a new and living way through the Vail, that is to say, his Flesh?
A65869Did the Apostle herein deny Jesus to be Christ?
A65869Didst not think this Applicable to thy Condition?
A65869Does this deny Him( the Son of God) to be Christ?
A65869Does this prove we deny Christ Jesus, that was born of the Virgin?
A65869F. Bugg, Come G. W. thou old Make- bate and Cunning Sophister, what canst thou say for thy self and thy Proselites, who write after thy Copy?
A65869F. Bugg, come Benjamin Antrobus, what sayest thou for thy self, why Sentence of Perjury should not be pronounced against thee?
A65869Green, what canst thou say for thy self?
A65869Have our Friends wrong''d the false Ministry therein?
A65869How came it to Pass that G. W. drew you into this snare?
A65869How now F. B. where art thou now with thy Charge and Condemnation of Perjury and Pillory upon us?
A65869I own the Son of God was before the Incarnation; then I ask, if he was not the Anointed of God, and a Saviour before his Incarnation?
A65869I say, who else did you assign these Titles to?
A65869If he saith it is, Query then, is it Transubstantiated?
A65869If he was, did not both the Ti ● les of Saviour and Anointed belong unto him, as being the Son of God?
A65869If so, then why dost thou not retract thy mistaken Books in that Case?
A65869If thou didst, then where art thou now, but in Aegypt?
A65869Is the masculine[ Him] properly relative to the Neuter[ Body] distinct from the Soul?
A65869Is this such a great Error of the Quakers?
A65869Not to all other Ministers in general, that are not of us, or not in outward Society with us: Who to then?
A65869Pray who do you account this Branch, if not G. Fox?
A65869Query, if their Bread and Wine be Spiritual?
A65869This is false also, here he puts[ the Gospel] for[ their Gospel] whose Gospel?
A65869Was he so tied up to brevity in this concern, that he allowed his Teacher no more room in a Book of ten or eleven Sheets?
A65869Was it to G, FOX, or the Light in him?
A65869What Spirit is this in our Adversary, which saith, It was not Jesus Christ that came in the Flesh, who was it then?
A65869What against I. P. for implying that the names Jesus and Christ do not chiefly and in the first place belong to the Body, but to him that took it?
A65869What confusion and Self- contradiction does the Man blindly run into?
A65869What does this Man quarrel at?
A65869What need he be so much concern''d for the false Ministry?
A65869What, will nothing less satiate his Fury, but our Destruction by Persecution again?
A65869Where one saith, I am of Paul, another of Apollo,& c. was this to reflect on them by name?
A65869Why am I vilified in this Case also?
A65869Why are thy Thoughts grown of late so bad of us?
A65869Why does not he appear, and make proof of F. B''s malicious confused Work against the Quakers?
A65869[ But where do we thus say of this Messiah?
A65869[ Even when we loved one another with love unfeigned, and how did our love abound one towards another?
A65869[ How then Living Witnesses of a Dispensation of the Love of God to Mankind?
A65869[ Thou art very mutable then, no doubt thy Thoughts grow worse and worse, and thy Charity very cold,] and why so?
A65869[ What, for owning Jesus Christ, and the Holy Scriptures, and standing by their Testimony?]
A65869[ What?
A65869[ Where do we teach that Christ''s Body is so?
A65869[ Where proves he as amply?]
A65869[ Where proves he only a Figure?
A65869and mistaken in thy Testimony for the Light of Christ and our Ministry and Doctrine( as in the beginning) both before and since thy conformity?
A65869eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65869how have these Impostors prevailed upon the People?
A65869only standing in the Faith?
A65854& c. Is this Obedience to the Apostles Doctrin, forsake not the assembling of your selves together?
A65854116.3?
A658542 d. Whether there are not more Heavens and Hells than One?
A658543 20. do not fully answer and fulfill the end of the Figures and Shadows, as being a far more excellent Dispensation?
A658543 d. Whether Hell be always spoken of or intended in Scripture as a limited Place?
A6585432.22?
A65854And can not the Dr.( with all his Learning) find out an Oneness between Christ in Heaven and his Members on Earth?
A65854And where proves he that it is Unchristian to ask such a Question to any that holds it?
A65854And why is he now in''s old Age so disturbed and angry against the Quakers?
A65854Are all Apostles, are all Prophets?
A65854Are all their Temporary Practices, Commands?
A65854Are ye the only called and chosen?
A65854By what Scripture proves he this?
A65854Can any Bread, Cup, or Wine give Life unto, or nourish the Soul unto Eternal Life?
A65854Can this be the Light of Nature?
A65854Dare they say they are free from Coveteousness, Pride and Envy?
A65854Does he think them to be the Substance, which is Christ?
A65854Doth the Preaching of Dr. Ford, and our hearing of him, unfit us for Fellowship with you?
A65854Doth the Preaching of John Payton, and such as he, make you only Saints, or is it the Preaching of the Women?
A65854Else what means the Heaven of Heavens?
A65854For asking, Where dost thou Read in all the Scriptures, that God doth require satisfaction for the Sins of the Elect?
A65854Hath not our Lord promised his Presence, and to be with us to the End of the World, that use and are sound in his Ordinances?
A65854How envious and unjust is it thus to condemn Persons upon report of their Enemies, who regard not Truth, but revenge and perversness, as in this?
A65854How great is the Darkness of such Preachers who so teach?
A65854How went the Spirit and the Grace of God by the other Assemblies, to sit down with you?
A65854If outward Types, Figutes and Shadows, be not of a decreasing and vanishing Nature?
A65854If so, why do not the present Priests and Professors sell their Possessions, and divide them, and have all things common?
A65854If the outward Bread and Cup were not figurative visible Signs, or Shadow of something more excellent?
A65854Is it in our Faith in God by Jesus Christ, attended with a sober Godly and Christian Conversation?
A65854Is this a part of your Christianity?
A65854Must you be Christians, because you deny the Communion of Saints?
A65854Or our hearing a young lively Non- conformist?
A65854Pray tell me who can Baptize with the Spirit, Is it not John''s Work, or any Man''s, or Christ''s Work alone?
A65854Pray where is the Unchristianity, or Antichristianity here?
A65854Pray, which are the best Christians?
A65854Some say, John Payton of Dudley speaks sometimes, yea, and the Women often talk in your Churches; an hour together, is this your Christianity?
A65854Thus faithless is this great Doctor; how contrary to the Faith of Christ and true Christians is his belief herein?
A65854Was this an universal and perpetual Command to the Church?
A65854What are there no Christians, no Saints in either?
A65854What more than a Figure does this Doctor suppose the Bread and Wine which they minister to be in the Sacrament so called?
A65854What perpetual Command and Necessity is there of the Shadow to continue, the Substance being come and manifest in Christ''s Church?
A65854What sad Complaint is this?
A65854What''s the matter now?
A65854What, may every Man or Woman speak in the Church?
A65854When will this Parasite cease his temporizing Flattery, and false Insinuations?
A65854Where is your Presbytery?
A65854Where proves he that the other are so, or that they were perpetual Commands of the Gospel?
A65854Whether the same Spirit or the same God could lead him in both?
A65854Which does he prefer here as, better Preacher?
A65854Who is set apart to the Work?
A65854Who lays on Hand?
A65854Who sets apart among you?
A65854Who shall lay any thing to the Charge of God''s Elect?
A65854Why then should Sin which is the Devil''s Work, be thus Preach''d up or contended for, by any who profess Faith in Christ Jesus?
A65854and 11.21, 30?
A65854and so far united unto, and in Union with him, and is not this divine Nature, the nature of the Creator?
A65854are not his Members in spiritual Union with him?
A65854does Christianity consist in Shadows, or in Life and Substance?
A65854does it consist in observation of the outward Elements?
A65854either, his Call to preach?
A65854himself; and wherein is our half Christianity only?
A65854i. e. That the Soul of Man should be the Being of God, and yet to be watched over by his Ministers; redeemed by Christ, and raised up by his Power?
A65854is but the Light of Nature?
A65854is called in Scripture, A Personal Coming?
A65854or laid any thing to their Charge?
A65854or whether filthy Lucre did not too much sway him?
A65854preach freely, without either Tythes or forced Maintenance, Lucre or Gain of Mony, or Rewards for Preaching?
A65854the Learned Dr. or Lively Non- conformist, by this distinction?
A65854what Cause has he for it?
A65854what does the Dr. mean by Local Heaven and Hell?
A65854what great hurt do we do them in not burying our Dead with them?
A65854what then is the other half of Christianity omitted by us?
A65884& c. But why so?
A65884& c. If none of the Church of England, nor any other, set him at work, how durst he Address the King expresly in their Names?
A65884( The Answer, is) Thou mightest as well ask, If the Moral Law be a Rule to Christ?
A6588431?
A658845, 6, 7, 8, 9?
A65884And do they not make use of him, gratifie and reward him, as their Agent and their Tool?
A65884And he feigns W. Penn to say, Call over the List: Are none of Truth''s Enemies here?
A65884And how I discovered thy repeated Falshoods, Forgery, Deceit and Wickedness, in divers matters wherein thy Quarrel much depends against us?
A65884And how contrary to the Apostle John''s Testimony is his Doctrine herein?
A65884And how does he Profane and take the sacred Name of the Lord God in vain?
A65884And in the same Cut, or Figure( which he entitles, The Quakers Synod) he feigns G. Whitehead to say, Are the Doors shut?
A65884And pray what has the Publick Ministry cost him these 15 Years time, since his turning to them?
A65884And then, what lofty Weeds and tall Cedars has he cut down among the Quakers?
A65884And to his saying, The Names Jesus and Christ are given to the Mediator,& c.[ True, but what follow?]
A65884Are not the Bibles we frequently use in our Houses and Families, the same used by other Protestants, and allow''d by Authority?
A65884Are not these bold Aspersions, reflecting on the Wisdom and Conduct of both King and Parliament, to term the said Liberty Deplorable?
A65884Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65884But how comes F. B. such a Proficient in his Competency of Learning now?
A65884But the Question being put, Is the Moral Law or Ten Commandments a Rule to the Christian''s Life?
A65884Didst not thou F. B. invite me to thy House sometimes?
A65884Do''st thou not remember how soberly thou wast answered, both by me and the other two Friends present?
A65884For what then have you been so very Bountiful to him, and Contributed such Considerable Sums of Money to him?
A65884Friends, Do you design to promote Christianity indeed?
A65884G. Whitehead has sent me one of his Books,& c. I was asked by an honest Friend, If he was not a Jesuite?
A65884Has all your Learning fail''d you, that you must needs contribute large Money to a busie Body, for his Scribbling against the Quakers?
A65884Has not F. B. here made a great Asseveration, As he hopes for Mercy,& c. to shew himself thus demure and innocent towards the Quakers?
A65884Have not some of the Priests own''d this Man for their Convert, even an eminent Convert of their Church?
A65884How then should the Body govern the Light?
A65884How wary then had People need be of receiving the Quakers Doctrine?
A65884I would ask thee,( Francis) Didst thou shew G. Keith this Passage, which thou hast cited out of his Way cast up, before it was printed?
A65884If he writ Truly to the Parliament, how could he so write Truly or Honestly to the King?
A65884Is he a fit Champion to undertake to defend both Theml, their Church, and the Protestant Religion?
A65884Is the Moral Law or Ten Commandments a Rule to the Christians Life?
A65884May not his Gain by them overballance all that Cost suppos''d, if ever they put him to any all that time?
A65884Now F. B. dost not thou Glory in thy Shame, in such Invention as this?
A65884Now F. B. may''st thou not be ashamed, thus to brag and vapour, and thus basely to fling Fearfulness and Cowardise upon us?
A65884Now that F. B. renders these, and such like Passages, in a literal Sense, observe his Notes in the Margent, i. e. Are not these Fifth- Monarchy- Men?
A65884Or is it his own officious, heady Act and Device only?
A65884Or to Accuse us with Cowardise?
A65884Q Is there any more than One God?
A65884The Answer was, Thou might as well ask, if the Moral Law be a Rule to Christ?
A65884This is F. B''s Annotation against the People called Quakers; but where is his Proof still?
A65884Thus F. B''s invented Method of forming Commands; how Idle and Impertinent does the Man appear herein?
A65884What Confusion and Self- contradiction does the Man blindly run into?
A65884What Ground has he for[ No Doubt] in this Case?
A65884What Ground hast thou then to Boast of our being Timerous to meet thee?
A65884What Spirit is this in our Adversary, which saith, It was not Jesus Christ that came in the Flesh?
A65884What is said of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?
A65884What may People think of you?
A65884What think his Friends of the Clergy of him?
A65884Where and when did ever W. B. thus Preach, That our Design is the supplanting Christianity?
A65884Where did ever any in the World hear Benjamin Bealing set or sing such a Hymn as this in the end of a Meeting, or any time else?
A65884Where have we ever so Concluded or Asserted?
A65884Whither art thou now run F. B?
A65884Who was it then?
A65884as G. W. did; as I am credibly informed by a Person of Note that saw it?
A65884eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65884of none Effect, by those or such positive Commands, as he has impudently form''d in opposition thereto, in his Pilgrim''s Progress, p. 16, 17, 18?
A65881& c. and is not This that came out from God, Part of God, and from God?
A65881Also he asketh, Where is the Demonstration of the Spirit with thee in Power and mighty Signs?
A65881And If He was the Son of God, and so Christ, before his Incarnation or assuming Flesh?
A65881And what Defence did the Baptists make for themselves herein?
A65881And what follows?
A65881And what if God will not bestow such Gifts and Signs now; must we therefore be no Christians?
A65881And what if Quakers pretend to these, as led by the Spirit of Truth?
A65881And what if many at once cryed, hear, hear?
A65881And whether this be not as high an Assertion of the Soul of Man, as can be supposed G. F. ever asserted?
A65881And who then shall escape your Censure in this Case that have not the Gift of Tongues immediately inspired?
A65881And why must we be put upon this Proof, or else be judg''d not only No Christians, but Impostors?
A65881And will this admit of Christ''s being Head of two separate Bodies; or of Three Christs?
A65881Are the Baptists willing to be thus concluded on this Ground?
A65881Are we not therefore the true Church?
A65881As for J. Ives''s great Question so much insisted on, Whether Christ''s Human Nature was a Part of Christ?
A65881But what Clamour?
A65881Can you think he hath well palliated Matters, either with Indifferency, Moderation or Impartiality between us?
A65881Do not some of the Baptists hold the same?
A65881Do you hold that his Soul, Spirit or his Divinity dyed?
A65881Doth not this oppose the Divinity of Christ, or Deity of the Son of God?
A65881Doth the Scripture herein make Two Christs?
A65881G. Fox saith thus; God breathed into Man the Breath of Life, and he became a living Soul, and is not this of God, of his Being?
A65881Gladman in the place quoted attest, that this was G. W''s Answer to the Question to which it is annexed by T. H. in G. W''s Name?
A65881How should he so differ with us( his Friends) being engaged with us, and oblieged to maintain our Principles?
A65881I ask thee, if Christ signifie Anointed, and God be Christ, as thou[ Quaker] affirmest, Whether God himself e anointed?
A65881If Carnal Eyes could see him simply as the Eternal Son of God, or his Glory, as of the only begotten of the Father?
A65881If Christ be separate, remote or divided from his Church, how is he the Head thereof, or his Church a living Body without( or divided from the Head?)
A65881If he was not truly the Christ of God( being the Son of God) before he took Flesh upon him, or was born of the Virgin Mary?
A65881If the Son of God was not in Being in the Beginning, and from Everlasting?
A65881Is Christ Head of his Church in any other Body, then that whereof they are Members, and united to him?
A65881Might they not at this rate as well make all Protestants to be Papists; yea, Jews, Mahometans,& c. because all agree in some Truths?
A65881Now you Promoters of this Q. Quibbles, for an Ingenuous Pamphlet, I ask you if any more of Christ properly dyed then the Body?
A65881Now you that have concern''d your selves for T. Hicks, Do you think to acquit him from Forgery by such Proceding?
A65881Or that Christ is a Person or Personal Being, consisting of Human Flesh and Blood without us?
A65881Or that as the Son( who is God) he be anointed as he is the Son?
A65881Or that his Glorious Body in Heaven is a human Body?
A65881Or that such Work will make a Pacification, or end the Controversie?
A65881Then how consistent with this is it to say, that the Human Nature( or Christ''s Body of Flesh and Blood) is Christ?
A65881Then, Whether or no they are Christians, who say, that the Soul of Man is a Spirit of the NATURE of God, which returns to God that gave it?
A65881Was Cicero such an one then?
A65881What Game do they almost scruple to play at?
A65881What say you Baptists to this Proposal?
A65881What was his Person, if not his Body?
A65881Where be the Gifts of working Miracles which were in the primitive time,& c?
A65881Where doth the Scripture say, that the Human Nature is the Christ?
A65881Where proves he these Words to be ours?
A65881Would the Baptists think it fair to be publisht in Print for Lyars, Fools and unjust on such an Account?
A65881Would you be thus served, both to wrong me, and abuse the World or your Readers, to tell them, The Quotations are truly recited out of our Books?
A65881and that by Earthly Parents or Relations, and not from a Spirit of Prophecy, as to respect some divine Qualification or new Nature?
A65881be an Opinion sufficient to prove Us No Christians?
A65881hath said?
A65881is this your indifferent Penn and ingenuous Writer?
A65881the Author of a Lye?
A65881then saying, most of them?
A65881what Discord?
A65881what Disorder?
A65881what Noise?
A65881what Tautologies?
A65867( George) Do we not wear our Cl ● thes on our Bodies?
A658671, 8. this was God''s own Testimony of him to Satan; to which Satan answered the Lord, and said, Doth Job fear God for nought?
A65867Again, some object, That God hath Mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardneth; Hath not the Potter power over the Clay?
A65867And as for his having power over the works of his hands, as the Potter hath over the Clay; who questions that?
A65867And asked these Priests, what Baptism it was?
A65867And the Lord said unto Cain, why art thou wroth?
A65867And then his last Question was, Whether the Lords Supper be not an Ordinance of Christ, binding us?
A65867And whatsoever may be known of God, is it not manifest within?
A65867And, oh Jerusalem, wash thine heart from wickedness, that thou mayst be saved; how long shall thy vain thoughts lodge within thee?
A65867Are you like to receive his teachings in the darkness?
A65867But, we pray you, how should you know and receive Gods teachings or leading into all Truth, if not by his Light within?
A65867Hear, O House of Israel, Is not my Way equal?
A65867Moreover, to these Questions before S. S. added three more; as in the first place, Whether the Scriptures are not to be our Rule of Life?
A65867Query, Whether or no wilt thou grant the same thing that S. Scandret hath done; viz ▪ that a Light of the Spirit of God is in every man?
A65867Reply, Did you ever read or hear such Doctrine before?
A65867Reply, Was not its appearance Spiritual, how then did it appear to all, and not in all?
A65867Reply, What then did he hate Esau for?
A65867S. S. A justified state is attended with Sanctification; what Righteousness is that which justifies?
A65867S. S. Did not God require more of Adam then the Light did dictate?
A65867S. S. This doth not prove that the Light doth reveal Christ; Is this Grace( that hath appeared to all) the Light in every man?
A65867S. S. This is not a full Light,& c. for God created the Stars, which are a Light; Must they therefore be the full Light of the Day& c?
A65867S. S. Who affirms they are?
A65867Secondly, Whether Perfection be attainable in this life?
A65867So that here the Light is the Rule to manifest and try mens actions, whether they are wrought in God, yes or nay?
A65867Thirdly, Whether impure persons( while such) be justified by the imputation of Christ''s Righteousness?
A65867V. Now concerning Justification, the question being asked, what it is?
A65867Was not the Spirit, the Law and Light of the Lord within?
A65867Was not their Rule within, and the Revelation of the things contained in Scripture inward, before they were written?
A65867We will appeal to the people, whether any of them can say, when they are reproved of sin, that they are not convinced of a contrary sta ● e?
A65867What then will become of all them that never came under it: Must they all be damned for want of Sprinkling or Plunging in Water?
A65867Whether Baptism with water be an Ordinance of Christ?
A65867Who would come over the threshold to Discourse with such a one?
A65867Wo unto him that sayeth unto his Father, what begettest thou,& c?
A65867and what do they tend to?
A65867and what is the good end of God in affording this Light of his Spirit to all, and such operations in unbelievers?
A65867and whether the Day dawning, and the Day- Star arising in the hearts be the Scriptures?
A65867and why is thy Countenance faln?
A65867are not your wayes unequal?
A65867but how long it is between death and this time of clensing?
A65867but must not the Body be subject to the Spirit, seeing Believers are to be sanctified throughout, in Body, Soul and Spirit?
A65867for when G. W. in a Letter would have put him to prove his call to the Ministry; and whether he own''d immediate Revelation in these dayes?
A65867hast not thou made an Hedge about him,& c?
A65867if thou do well, shalt thou not be accepted?
A65867is he not among them that searched the Scriptures to find Eternal Life in them, but would not come to Christ that they might have Life?
A65867is not this like the Pope''s Doctrine for a Purgatory?
A65867must they pin it upon their sleeves?
A65867must they turn their backs on the Light of Christ within, to be captivated with the Popes and Priests darkness, with their dark and implicite faith?
A65867or by turning your backs on the Light?
A65867or that his Commands should be made void?
A65867or whether he were a true administrator of it?
A65867or whether or no professed Christians in England must be inferiour to the Gentiles or Heathen?
A65867or whether the Saints deceased are yet clensed, yes or nay?
A65867or will you deny it?
A65867were it not an impertinent vain thing, to warn persons of such a danger, if they were absolutely secured from being liable to any such danger?
A65867were they not from the Light within?
A65867what, doth he render man like a Block, or a Beast, not to go or act in obedience or subjection, but as he is forc''d or driven?
A65867whether that of Water, or the Baptism of the Spirit?
A65867which he affirmed, though he durst not tell us whether Babes or Believers were to be the Subjects of it?
A65858& c. But did G. F. say, That the Soul of the Creature Man was part of God, or of his being without Beginning or End?
A65858( What an easie matter is it for a wicked person to write malicious Pamphlets at that rate?)
A65858* Where proves he these to be the Quakers words?
A658583 dly, Whence hadst thou thy Copy and Credit thereof?
A65858And dare E. P. or his Associates own and stand by these Doctrines( as Religious and Rational) which W. P. opposed?
A65858And if Human Body be not an Earthly Body?
A65858And in the Question, Where doth the Scripture say, that Christ''s glorified Body in Heaven is of Human Nature?
A65858And shall those glorious Bodies then have occasion to drink New Wine with Christ, in his Father''s Kingdom, do you think?
A65858And what follows?
A65858And what then?
A65858And where and when did G. F. say in a Meeting, I have power to bind and to loose whom I please?
A65858And who did so charge him?
A65858And why may not G. F. deny Christ to have a personal Body, besides or distinct from his Church, as well as G. Whitehead?
A65858And why so?
A65858As for Quaking and Trembling, I ask him, If these be the Deceivable Gestures which he accuseth us of?
A65858But what We are these give this Answer besides Edward Paye?
A65858But what saith it?
A65858But who are made Just or Righteous by Christ Jesus?
A65858But would the Baptists be so serv''d?
A65858By what Rule must we believe that the Scriptures are the Only Rule of Faith and Practice, while they no where do call themselves so?
A65858By what Rule then should he be resolved what those or any of those other things were that are not written?
A65858Coal, in his Letters from Barbadoes?
A65858Cole''s original Letter?
A65858Could the Devil himself have been more Vile, and prodigiously Arrogant, to take upon him to Determine a Man''s endless Condition?
A65858Doth not both God and Christ, in some degree, appear within, to be known within, suppose ye?
A65858E. P. Which way could the Quakers expect to escape being defamed or discredited?
A65858How can they deny the Blood, when they have owned it to be a principal Part of that Sacrifice offered for an Attonement?
A65858How does he answer the Questions then which the Righteousness of Faith gives answer to?
A65858If Sprinkling Infants be Baptism, are you not Anabaptists, when you Re- baptize them, or Baptize them again?
A65858If they are Perfect,& c. what need have they of the Mediatory Office of Christ?
A65858No sure: Was not the antecedent Question of Christ?
A65858Now, who can think( sayest thou) that such a Number of Men should agree together in Charging G. Fox with a Falshood?
A65858O Generation of Vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the Wrath to come?
A65858Or must these Enormities be reputed only as Human Frailties?
A65858Or so called in Scripture?
A65858Or was the Enquiry after the Scripture?
A65858Or who descend into the Deep, that is, to bring Christ again from the dead?
A65858Say not in thy Heart who shall ascend into Heaven, that is, to bring Christ from above?
A65858The Word is near thee,& c. Is this all one as to say, the Scripture is near thee, even in thy Mouth and Heart?
A65858To the Question then put, Is the Heavens that must retain him only the Hearts of Men?
A65858Was that all the Instance the Westmorland Petitioners were brought for?
A65858Was this Justice, or any Judicial Course of Passing Judgment before both Parties are heard, thinkest thou?
A65858What Christ then?
A65858What Meeting, and who are Witnesses of this Story?
A65858What occasion for New Wine then?
A65858What was that the False Christ that dyed at Jerusalem, without the Gates of Jerusalem?
A65858When do these Men expect to be made clean, in the Grave or at their expected Resurrection unto Glory?
A65858Whence it follows, that they that do not keep his Commandments, do not love him: The Question is, Whether God accepts them that do not love him?
A65858Where do we the said People or our Ministers declare, That the Holy Scriptures were not given by Divine Inspiration, or only given by Human Tradition?
A65858Where doth the Scriptures say, That the highest Attainments of the Holy Spirit do but fit Men for Water- Baptism?
A65858Where proves he Quaking and Trembling,( without exception) deceivable Gestures?
A65858Who hath so writ?
A65858Who shall ascend or descend to fetch me the Scriptures?
A65858Who so wrote?
A65858Why do they now shrink back and decline their Brother in his Work, seeing the Enquiry was so fairly made of them?
A65858Why should these Impostors talk of the Blood of Christ?
A65858Ye Serpents, ye Generation of Vipers, how can ye escape the Damnation of Hell?
A65858and how can the Light of Christ within either oppose his Doctrine Ministry or Offices?
A65858and on what occasion?
A65858and why do you dissent from them?
A65858else how should that which may be known of God be manifest within, seeing there''s no knowledg of God but by Christ?
A65858in his Spiritual Kingdom?
A65858is it Christ''s, yea, or nay?
A65858or are you not rather too Carnal in your Expectations, in this Matter, whilst you mean literally?
A65858or be to do as he would be done unto?
A65858would they take it well to have Books made out of their Adversaries against them?
A65858— And if Christ''s Body in Heaven be Natural, whose Body is it that is Spiritual, Glorious,& c?
A65887406. of the Nonconformists preaching up Blood and Treason, and Garments rol''d in the Blood of Kings,& c?
A65887And after divers hard terms about Theology, in p. 40. he queries thus, Whether or no they are the Words that the Holy Ghost hath taught?
A65887And did the Quakers herein propose either to be the sole Judges, who is a True Christian?
A65887And how does Jeremy Ives prove his Call to Dip or Plunge People in Water?
A65887And how many of them did preach up and esteem the Inward Work of the Spirit and Grace of God in the Heart?
A65887And was not this then for an Evidence of our Christianity, while we do not profess any real Christianity without Faith and Practice by Inspiration?
A65887And what Call, Gospel- Rule, or Precept, have Baptists for Night Dipping, and Fleeing or Absenting from Meetings in Times of Persecution?
A65887And what Evidence of their Faith or Christianity do those their Baptiz''d Believers produce?
A65887And what sad Shifts?
A65887And whether he does profess any Immediate Inspiration and Revelation from Heaven for his Dipping People?
A65887And whether there be not a plain Difference in the Nature of the Words?
A65887And why is this Impossible?
A65887And why should he rake into his Neighbours Affairs; either to find out Occasion against them, or to prejudice them in their Properties?
A65887And why so?
A65887Art thou not here found guilty, and allowing that in thy self, which thou hast condemned others for, as Unchristian?
A65887But doth not the Spirit of God search all things, and the Spiritual Man judge all things?
A65887But hath he done so?
A65887Can Quakers be Men of Conscience and Integrity, that while they judge Swearing, will procure Men to swear?
A65887For his daring us to appoint Time& Place, he querieth, If this Phrase signifies any more then if you are not afraid to appoint Time and Place?
A65887Hast thou not herein shewn a persecuting Spirit to render us obnoxious?
A65887I would further ask, if Jer Ives and his Brethren do not own them to be Christians whom they Baptize?
A65887Is it because of the Impropriety of the Speech, or that it is too Ironical for such a grave, sober Christian as Jeremy Ives would be accounted?
A65887Is it not easy to see the Absurdity and Folly of these men, and how they make Lyes their Refuge, and cover themselves with Falshoods?
A65887Is this thy Charity and Respect to the Laws of God and the King?
A65887It s not unlike but he would be very short at this, and give such an Answer as this, What''s that to you?
A65887Ives has dealt by the despised Quakers?
A65887Ives?
A65887Judge Serious Reader; Is not here both Huffing, Disdaining and Reviling, and what he himself hath accounted such?
A65887Or what Evidence can he produce for His particular Call thereto?
A65887See here how plainly S. E. hath signified his Intention in this Matter: And what but Prejudice and Enmity can otherwise construe his words?
A65887See here, was it only the Scruple of these Men in taking the Oath that is opposed or reproved, and not their taking it?
A65887What has he to do to question or accuse them therein?
A65887What has he to do to shew himself a Busie Body in other Men''s Matters?
A65887What is the true and proper Signification and Discrimination of Enthusiast and Impostor?
A65887What super- natural Evidence or necessary Proof doth J. I. require of any ones having Immediate Inspiration from God?
A65887Where art thou now Jeremy Ives?
A65887Whether Immediate Inspiration and Revelation from Heaven, are in Being in the True Church in these dayes, yea, or nay?
A65887Whether Immediate Inspiration be not necessary to the being of a True Christian or Jew inward?
A65887Why do not the Baptists( who deem themselves Christians and Us none) begin, and shew Us such an Example, as he hath prescribed?
A65887Would it not make one smile to see the sad Shifts the Poor Men are put to?
A65887and also reasonable, that when it is agreed what a True Christian is, that Jeremy should prove himself one before he be admitted to prove others none?
A65887and most of them take Pleasure in them that do so?
A65887and so the real Derivation of Enthusiasm and Imposture?
A65887and whether if a Conscientious Refusing, it was not Religious?
A65887dost thou not know in thy own Conscience and by sufficient Experience, that we have not been afraid of thee?
A65887hath he performed Promise and Covenant with all, and satisfied all his Creditors?
A65887have none of them had cause to complain of him in those Matters?
A65887if he doth not, whether he may not be deemed an Impostor therein?
A65887if he doth, what super natural Evidence can he produce for it?
A65887is that of Water?
A65887or did he expect to open our Ears by going over his Matter again?
A65887or have they hereby demerited this man''s Sleight and Derision he thus taunteth them with?
A65887to agree upon the Definition of a Christian, as a Standard to go by; and then for Jeremy to prove himself that Christian first?
A65888A. W. S.& c. what think you of your Convert F. B. his Work?
A65888And are these his Pious Endeavours, for which you his Approvers have so highly Congratulated him?
A65888And before I came to the Barr I was moved to Pray, that the Lord would Confound their Wickedness and Envy,[ And what Crime was that?]
A65888And is this Obedience to the Light, no Step nor Advance towards Salvation?
A65888And seeing F. Bugg has thy Approbation?
A65888And what of all this?
A65888And what same Men?
A65888And why so?
A65888Bugg''s Query, Whether was the Sufferings of Christ, or the Sufferings of the Quakers greatest?
A65888But how does his Sorrow for it appear, when now he tells us,''T was to shew what they( i. e. the Quakers) Actually Deserved?
A65888But is not here rather F. Bugg''s great Envy, Darkness and Ignorance apparent?
A65888By such Logick who may escape his Uncharitable and Unjust Censure of new kind of Popery?
A65888Could this be to Encourage Mahometism?
A65888Dark and Disobedient Man, can thy Eyes be open to see without Light?
A65888Did ever more deadly Malice, bloody Envy and Falshood appear in any Agent of Satan?
A65888Did not William Thorpe deem them Antichristian then?
A65888Did that Body which Christ took upon him make the World?
A65888Do you really Approve of his Books and Pamphlets writ by him against the said People, as namely of these in particular, under these Titles?
A65888Do you really in your Consciences Approve of Francis Bugg''s writing Books and Pamphlets against the People called Quakers, as he hath done?
A65888Do you think he spends his Time or Estate well in such invidious fruitless Work?
A65888Dost thou approve or disallow hereof?
A65888F. B. who was thy Informer about this said Oath pretended?
A65888For doth not this Mocker''s Language, Comparison, and Treatment of this kind, bespeak his deadly Malice and Design?
A65888How Ignorant is this Mocker of Scripture Language?
A65888How will F. B. prove such Christ''s Ministers, or Gospel Ministers?
A65888I am willing to let Richard Ashbye know, that his Brother Whitehead is false in this also: And why so?
A65888I desire to know of you, if you Approve of Bugg''s thus Bragging and Boasting of your Approbations in Print?
A65888In what Church have they made Division?
A65888In what State have they made Division?
A65888Is not this an audacious Affront to the State, and maliciously to render us obnoxious thereto, and so to expose us to Persecution and Ruin?
A65888Is there not a wise Man amongst you?
A65888Is this thy Justice or Judicial Way of Proceedure?
A65888Is this your Defender of Eternal Truths?
A65888It was not Jesus Christ for whom the Body was Prepared, Is was not Jesus Christ that came in the Flesh; but the Word?
A65888Milme, What say you?
A65888Must they all suffer for my Fault, if I had committed it, which I did not, as many can Witness?
A65888No Body; that''s false, for his words, they tell you, imply some Body; but from what Meeting?
A65888Note, This also is positively denied by us as a gross and foul Calumny: Pray where do any of the Quakers so say of G. F?
A65888Now we Query of thee, and others his Approvers, whether such his Proceeding be Warrantable, either by the Law of God or Man?
A65888Now we Query of you, his Approvers, whether such his Proceedings be Warrantable, either by the Law of God or Man?
A65888Now, pray observe what more direct Answer to F. Bugg''s Query could I have given?
A65888O ● was he scared or frighted by any Man, or Men, or Prophecies, or Sermons of ours thereunto?
A65888One great Complaint is, That for his Erecting a Mock- Pillory, they Indicted him at the Old- Bailey, London, p. 3. Who were they Indicted him?
A65888Or Christ the Word which took Flesh, or assumed that Body?
A65888Or canst thou attain Salvation in Darkness?
A65888Or canst thou truly yield Obedience to Christ''s Precepts, either in Darkness, or without Obedience to his Light in thee?
A65888Or do you help him in the Charge?
A65888Or was he not rather Consciencious in those Confessions?
A65888Out of what Book was it Read to G. W. and by whom?
A65888Seeing Christ is the Author of Eternal Salvation to as many as obey him; can any truly obey him, but in his Light?
A65888Tending to Encourage Mahometism] is a new, as well as undue Charge; what''s his pretended Reason or Proof for the same?
A65888To the latter part of his Charge, I deny it, that the Quakers have made Divisions not only in Church, but in State?
A65888Was it a just Course to Convince us of Error that he took against us by his Mock- Trial and Scandalous Mock- Pillory?
A65888Was this then Blasphemy?
A65888What Care of the Protestant Religion or Interest therein, has appeared on your parts?
A65888What Ingenuity or Prudence hath Bugg, or his Abettors shewn in thus Representing such a Body( of Protestant Subjects) as being Papists?
A65888What Ingenuity, Honesty, or Prudence hath Bugg, or you his Abettors, shewn in thus Representing such a Body of Protestant Subjects, as being Papists?
A65888What Insolency, and Audacious Attempt is this?
A65888What Regard or Respect to the present Government have you therein Manifested?
A65888What Regard or Respect to the present Government, or Care of the Protestant Religion, have you( his Approvers) therein Manifested on your Parts?
A65888What notorious Falshoods are these?
A65888What say you his Ministers to these things?
A65888What say you his Watchers?
A65888What says F. B. to this Vindication?
A65888What use does our Scornful Adversary make of this?
A65888When to Believe in the Light was an Express Precept of Christ?
A65888Where''s then his Sorrow?
A65888Whether F. Bugg made all these solemn Confessions in a fright?
A65888Whether F. Bugg''s Affront and Contradiction hereunto, be not Seditious?
A65888Whether was the Sufferings of Christ, or the Sufferings of the Quakers greatest?
A65888Why then should you be pitied or spared?
A65888Why then will you not bring forth Sheba the Son of Bichri, the Man of Belial, G. W?
A65888Will it be for your Credit to Encourage him in his Work of Envy and Falshood against us?
A65888Yet they have among them many good Exhortations; and they own Christ to be the Word of God, the Power of God, the Wisdom of God, will not this do?
A65888eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65888spring out of the Dregs of the People, as Ranters, when first thou turnedst Quaker?
A65888vindicates him,[ What in denying of Ch ● ist?
A65888what a Whirl- pool is he fallen into?
A47140( g) The Saints are partakers of the Divine Nature, and so are they of the Holy Ghost; is therefore the Holy Ghost a Work or Effect wrought in us?
A47140And is it the Baptists Doctrine to direct Men to the Material Temple, and Jerusalem, the Type for the Antitype?
A47140And shall any Christian say, that none of these Types signified Christ without, but only Christ within?
A47140And that he existeth outwardly, bodily, without us at God''s right Hand: What Scripture Proof hath he for these Words?
A47140And then what and where is God''s right Hand?
A47140And tho''I have not answer''d the said two( b) Books, why may not I say as they do, They are not worth answering?
A47140And was it not the same as we eat and drink?
A47140And when was that coming to be?
A47140And where do the Scriptures say, the Blood was there shed for Justification, and that Men must be directed to Jerusalem to it?
A47140And where doth the Scripture say he is outwardly and bodily glorified at God''s right Hand?
A47140And where doth the Scripture say?
A47140And where was it that God raised Christ from the Dead?
A47140And why did W. Penn give such a daring Challenge to Thomas Hicks, Reason against Railing, p. 184. and complain against him in these words?
A47140And why should Disputes viva voce be more offensive to Civil Peace than Disputes in Print?
A47140And why?
A47140Art thou deputed to Answer to what I have Charged them with?
A47140But is it not sad, that their false Philosophy should destroy their Faith, and deceive so many People, and destroy their Faith?
A47140But saith T. Ellwood, He does own that the Blood of Christ is more than the Blood of another Saint; but what B ● ood?
A47140But what then?
A47140But wherein does he charge him?
A47140But why must the Felicity of the Soul depend upon that of the Body?
A47140Can outward Blood wash the Conscience?
A47140Can we then deny a meek Man to be a Christian, a just, a merciful, a patient, a charitable and vertuous Man to be like Christ?
A47140Can you think so?
A47140Christ within, and Christ without?
A47140Did he ever write against these Principles he now holds?
A47140Did he not eat and drink?
A47140Do these Days express the Glory that he had with the Father before the World began, in which he is now glorified?
A47140Do these Terms express the Glory that he had with the Father before the World began?
A47140Does not this imply two Gods, and that God had a Father?
A47140Does this prove that Christ has no Body at all?
A47140Elwood give out that I differ from them in Doctrine, these men say I do not: What Confusion is here among them that say they are in Unity?
A47140For was not he the brightness of the Fathers glory, and the express Image of his Divine Substance?
A47140Hath not every single person as real and true Right to Justice, as a great number?
A47140Have you any Testimony of their owning that Letter?
A47140He does not own that Solomon Eccles''s Expression was an Article of their Faith, but does he disown it?
A47140He says I am disowned by them, where I live, I suppose he means the( a) Scots, do I Live among them?
A47140Horn''s Horn, yea or no; or rather whether has he not broken his own Horn?
A47140How?
A47140I Answer, Is the Joy of the Ancients now in Glory imperfect?
A47140I happened to charge W. Penn with self contradiction, will you hear that proved?
A47140I say, what cause have I to recite G. Whitehead and W. Penn''s whole Books to you, when they have not done so?
A47140If I might, I desire to have liberty to speak, when was the date of the Book?
A47140If the Translation be not good, why do you make use of it?
A47140If this were true, as it is most false, is it not most unjust Reasoning?
A47140In his Address to Protestants, second Edition, p. 152. he saith, But what then can be the meaning of Christ''s words, Go tell the Church?
A47140Is here any Transubstantiation?
A47140Is it any Reflection to say, God can not lye, and that he can not contradict his purpose?
A47140Is it contrary to their Religion to dispute their Adversary, viva voce?
A47140Is it not to make the Soul a kind of Widow, and so in a state of Mourning and Disconsolateness, to be without its beloved Body?
A47140Is it now to be looked for outwardly?
A47140Is it visibl ● or invisible?
A47140Is not this a plain Justification of Solomon Eccles''s Letter, That that Blood is no more than that of another Saint?
A47140Is not this abominab ● e Perversion of Scripture, to confirm his Antichristian Doctrine?
A47140Is not this enough to cheat all the World?
A47140Is there any thing here offensive?
A47140Is there none in the Christian World but the Quakers, that thirst after the Power of God in their Souls?
A47140Is this your Christianity?]
A47140Let us but soberly consider( saith William Penn) what Christ is, what is Christ but Meekness, and Justice, and Mercy, and Patience?
A47140Loid''s going away was a cause of the Separation, and yet was a beginning of the Separation: And is it not shameful?
A47140Luke 9.26, 27 Now what is that Glory of the Father, in which his coming is, is it visible to the Carnal Eye?
A47140May a Malefactor make this excuse; You shall not call me before a Justice without my consent?
A47140Norwood used to them who did excommunicate him, Are none the People of God but your selves?
A47140Now I have done with the two first Heads, shall I go on to prove the other two, or shall we adjourn to another day?
A47140Now here is G. Whiteheads reply, What Nonsense and Vnscriptural Language is this?
A47140Now mark, these Ten Articles of mine, that he calls Carnal, they are short, will you hear them?
A47140Now was this man of a Turbulent Spirit?
A47140Or are they in Heaven but by halves?
A47140Pray, Sir, where do you live, and what is your Name?
A47140Pray, may not a meeting held six months after contradict a meeting going before?
A47140Pray, was not Christ''s Body Elementary?
A47140Reasons and Causes,& c. — I appeal to you, is not this more than a Verbal Confession?
A47140Says G. Whitehead to R. Gordon, Dost thou look for Christ''s coming again to appear outwardly in a bodily Existence?
A47140See this little man''s passion now, what is he but a Creature, and a contentious Creature?
A47140T. E.) hath applyed that passage in Scripture, Master, is it I?
A47140Therefore the next Question to be put, must be, Whether he was the anti- typical Sacr ● fice?
A47140To tell of God being Co- Creator wi ● h the Father, or that God had glory with God?
A47140Was he like the Shell of an Egg without the Meat of an Egg?
A47140Was it not at Jerusalem?
A47140Was not Christ always in himself?
A47140Was there any Holiness ever in any Prophet or Apostle, but it is like a Drop to the Ocean to what was in ● ur blessed Lord?
A47140What Ministers were they?
A47140What breach upon breach did they make on all other Professions whereof they had been formerly, as Church of England, Presbyterian, Baptists?
A47140What is Christ but Meekness, Justice, Mercy, Patience Charity, and Vertue in Perfection?
A47140What is the last Remedy against oppression?
A47140What is this Discourse for, then?
A47140What is this, but to make G. Whitehead the Metropo ● itan?
A47140What other Body could it be?
A47140What says T. Elwood( in his way of quibling) six and an half?
A47140What work did G. Fox and G. Whitehead make?
A47140What( c) Nonsense and Darkness is this?
A47140Where do the Scriptures say, saith G. W.) the blood was there shed for Justification, and that Men must be directed to Jerusalem to it?
A47140Where doth the Scripture say, that he is outwardly and bodily glorified at God''s right Hand?
A47140Who Printed that Letter?
A47140Who is he that dares to make a Distinction between Christ''s Body and his Spirit, and to put asunder what God hath joyned together?
A47140Who is sufficient for these things?
A47140Who makes it?
A47140Who says it is?
A47140Why can it be ● upposed?
A47140Why then did they dispute with the Baptists, and mightily provoked them thereunto, and that viva voc ●?
A47140Will you( speaking to them all four that spoke sometimes one and sometimes another) take upon you to vindicate your Friends?
A47140[ What is this but great hypocrisie?
A47140and what is the way to have it remembred( according to God''s ordinary manner of working) if not by preaching?
A47140but the question there was, Is it thou?
A47140he does not say it is a Mystery, but he puts three ifs to it, If a M ● stery,& c. Pray was our blessed Lord a mere Shell?
A47140i. e. Why is the Flesh conceived of the Holy Ghost, judged by the nature of an Human Body?
A47140or was he like the Shell of any Fruit, and no Kernel in it?
A47140within us, or without us only?
A47140‖ But is not the Serpent or Devil without Men as well as within many Men?
A65868* which is as much as to say, not Christ in them, but Christ in men; and that his riches is not the possession; what folly is this?
A6586813. which came down from Heaven?
A6586817. and doth he not ordain wicked men for Judgement, such as the Caldeans and false Teachers, Jude 4. and Satan too, as to Job?
A6586818. if they did not possess his glory, when the riches of the glory of this mystery was Christ in the Saints''the hope of glory?
A658682. Who did or doth sow them Seeds?
A6586824 but thou sayest that David acknowledges he had then Iniquity, for how was Iniquity his, if there was none in him?
A6586827, 28. and what are all these the word of God and in unity?
A6586829. and was not Isaiah one of these Bretheren?
A658684. but I. Horn, in a Paper to me saith, that Jesus hath a humane Body and Soul*(& where does the Scripture say that Christs Soul is humane?
A658688, 9. whether is it an outward City or not?
A65868Again in thy last Paper thou declarest thy Ignorance of the two Seeds, and askest what be those two Seeds?
A65868Again thou sayst that Matthew was chosen before the Evangelist wrote this Book; what Darkness and Ignorance is this?
A65868And are not many of your company transgressors of his Doctrine, in wearing gaudy and costly attire, with their cuffs, ribbons and silver lace?
A65868And are you sure that they will prove believers, that sprinckle them as the seed of believers in your account?
A65868And did not the Prophets and Apostles alwayes Reprove them, and warn People of them?
A65868And does not the Book of Common- Prayer call them Priests?
A65868And in that you say, Christ hath not forbid them to you, how is that?
A65868And then why not as well four or five bodies?
A65868And what confusion is this J. Horne in, in his Warring for this his Fathers Kingdom?
A65868And what is it that puts you in remembrance to take bread and wine?
A65868And what untempered stuff is this?
A65868And where shall it be?
A65868And where we asked them whether they believe there was no blood left in Christs body when crucisied?
A65868And where we asked you, what is the Light with which Christ Lighteth every man which cometh into the World?
A65868And where you ask, where we read that the Gospel is Preached in every Creature?
A65868Answ?
A65868But do you certainly know we are such?
A65868But this I return back upon them as a lie and a slander invented in their malice, for do they know us to be Jesuites?
A65868Here''s confusion indeed, and where does the Scripture say it is the outward Object and medium of faith?
A65868How often hast thou in thy Papers said thou hast not belyed me?
A65868In Answer to my first thou sayst; Christ in his Spirit Ascended up to Heaven, when his Body was upon Earth, is this an Answer to the Question?
A65868In which he hath shewed his falshood and Ignorance, for does sickness abide upon all men till death?
A65868J. Horn where art thou now?
A65868J. Horn, thou wast herein touched; what wast thou affraid to have thy works tryed and brought to light?
A65868Judge Reader, is this a good Doctrine or Consequence of theirs which they draw from the words of Truth and Scripture?
A65868Or are the Scriptures God?
A65868Or are they groaning in some Purgatory between Heaven and Hell?
A65868Or promise that they shall repent?
A65868Paul did not the Evil,& c. To which I say, that their words are as much as if they had said, that a sinner sins not; What folly is this?
A65868Query, Why I say, that the one shall rise into everlasting Life and the other into Condemnation?
A65868Repentance and remission of sins was not Preached by Christs Ministers to infants through Sprinckling them; what do you repent for them?
A65868Reply, In this have you spoken falsely on both hands, for we did not then ask, what is the Light which Christ giveth?
A65868Seeing these blind men aforesaid have accounted the Prophets Words more sure then his?
A65868They answer, how should we certainly believe what is not revealed?
A65868To know Christ as he was the Power of God before the World was, is not the Knowledge of him to Salvation?
A65868To this they say, were not the false Prophets and Deceivers alwayes a Judgement?
A65868To which I say, what confusion deceit and doubting is this you are found in?
A65868Was there ever such deceit and confusion as this?
A65868What are the graves these are in, and out of which they shall arise?
A65868What be the bodies they shall rise with?
A65868What do you think that Christ did not speak in these Apostles?
A65868What is not that which is Spiritual Mistical?
A65868What is the Scriptures without and God one?
A65868What silly men are ye?
A65868What then, hath Christ sin in him if a man be Righteous as Christ is Righteous when he hath sin in him?
A65868What was not these riches the possession in them too?
A65868What, is not Cuffs, Ribbons, and Lace( which many of your company wear) vanity in apparrel?
A65868When be they sown?
A65868When shall those Seeds arise, or be raised, whether after the bodily death or after spiritual death?
A65868Where be they sown?
A65868Where proves he that by Scripture?
A65868Where we asked J. H. and T. M. What is their ground for sprinkling the Children, of them they count believers?
A65868Whether be these two Seeds, and two bodies in all the world or two Seeds in every man, and the two bodies to or in every man?
A65868Why do they not discover us to be such then?
A65868Will not the same stir you up to the remembrance of Christs death?
A65868and doest thou believe that God putteth no trust in his Saints according to his words that thou hast quoted to prove thy Deceit?
A65868and for what end didst thou send them?
A65868and how do you know that other Peoples Children whom you have refused to sprinckle are not as well the seed of believers as those whom you sprinckle?
A65868and what Sin canst thou prove the good Angels Guilty of, that makes them Impure?
A65868and what are the names of those good Angels that thou hast so accused?
A65868and what is the Substance of it?
A65868and when he sought not to the Lord but to the Physitians?
A65868and when he was in rage with the Prophet of the Lord, and put him in Prison?
A65868and when it was departed from the Lord?
A65868and where dyed they that death?
A65868and whether any be yet come to that beloved City?
A65868and whether was Matthew one of the Eleven seeing he was not then chosen, when Christ did arise from the dead?
A65868are they with the Father in Heaven groaning for it?
A65868but how prove we that Adam had blood?
A65868but whetter the Light with which Christ Lighteth every man that comheh into the World be natural or spiritual?
A65868did ever Christs Ministers plead for and take Tythes as thou hast done?
A65868did you ever hear of sinful, mortal, holy, spotless, compleat Saints and believers in Christ?
A65868dyed in the hope of?
A65868how hath thy deceit appeared in thy sending so many Questions to R. Hubberthorne, as thou hast done?
A65868how sadly hath I. H. come off here and shifted for himself, what doth he make swearing by and confessing Christ all one?
A65868or did you ever read in Scripture of a sinful spotless Saint?
A65868thou Hypocrite and lyar, art thou asham''d to own thy own words?
A65868thou Hypocrite, hast thou been crying out against us, as blind and Brutish, and doest thou grope like a blind man?
A65868thou art not Questioned when the Book was written, nor when Matthew was chosen, but who was the Eleven that was together?
A65868what Deceit, Hypocrisie, and confusion are you in?
A65868what darkness and deceit art thou in I. H. what art thou wholly past feeling?
A65868what darkness and folly are they in?
A65868what deceivers and Hypocrites are you, to preach up,( and to encourage them in) such vanity and pride?
A65868what filthy Deceit and Impudency are you in?
A65868what sottishness are these men in?
A65868where hast thou Scripture for these your Practices?
A65868where is the pride and vanity in apparrel, which you reproved the People for in your other Book?
A65868wouldst thou now get into favour with ths Priests of the Nation, whom thou hast so palpably writ against in thy Book called A Brief Discovery,& c?
A65856( And did not Nebuchadnezzar confess to God''s Power and Kingdom as above his own?)
A6585614. were not these Parables against Jerusalem, and the Jews who persecuted and slew the Prophets of God, and his Son Christ the Heir?
A6585619. did the Apostle herein contradict himself or his Christian Testimony?
A6585637. and was not Daniel one of them that stood in the King''s Palace?
A65856An immortal God, or an immortal Devil?
A65856And also Isaac Pennington, who is known to be an Innocent Harmless Man, and hath been a great Sufferer, even under the present Power?
A65856And as to the question, How should the Army set up their Standard at Rome, but by Fighting?
A65856And dare he say this was a Temporizing in the Primitive Christians?
A65856And did not the King make Daniel Ruler over the whole Province of Babylon?
A65856And did they then go against this great Army to fight them?
A65856And have not our peaceable Conversations declared the same?
A65856And may he not see how nearly this suits the case of G. F. and others whom he so bitterly enveighs against?
A65856And might they not have required this as Magistrates, and seen what satisfaction would have been made, according to their own engagements?
A65856And shall this Generation who have exceeded what hath been done by their Fathers, go unpunisht?
A65856And was not this thy wedding Dinner for Jews and Gentiles, whom thou hadst invited to Merchant- Taylors- Hall?
A65856And were not such to be commended in their Place?
A65856And what is all this but to render us the very People called Quakers as vile, perfideous and obnoxious to the Government, as he could possibly do?
A65856And what was thy intended Mystery in all this?
A65856And where''s the Temporizing or Apostacy?
A65856And while they stood in the Councel of the Lord, and the People hearkned to them, was not the Lord among them?
A65856And will you tell of Reformation, and yet act in the same Footsteps?
A65856Answer plainly, for it was a very publick Frolick, and whether or no had not the Bible been burned, if the Officer at the Exchange had not prevented?
A65856Are not all these Elders Christians, that will dote ● o much of an earthly King, Traytors against Christ?
A65856Are these Oaths, or esteemed the Oaths of the deceased, because mention is made of the Name of God, and Hand and Seal to them?
A65856But is this to render him obnoxious to the Government?
A65856Could any People have declared themselves more for fighting?
A65856Couldst thou imagin that the immortal God would ever move to it?
A65856Dare John Pennyman say, that Samuel was a temporizing Hypocrite herein, or was Samuel insincere in this matter?
A65856Did ever the true Christians call out for such Kings to be set over them?
A65856Did not Christ say the Kings of the Gentiles exercise Lordship over them, but it shall not be so among you?
A65856Does his Envy and Malice rise up to his Throat, and like to choak him?
A65856Hast thou done as thou wouldest be done by, thus to expose Men, and question them for that which thou thy self darest not adventure openly to oppose?
A65856Have we ever declared, That we have owned Bloody Principles or Practices?
A65856Have we ever declined Christ''s Kingship over his Church throughout the whole World, and set up an earthly King over the Church, instead of Christ?
A65856Have we not all along been against such a Practice?
A65856How now J. P. is this thy Conscience that thou dischargest?
A65856How now John, is this thy abhorring to render us obnoxious to the Government?
A65856How now John, what a Labyrinth art thou fallen into, through thy Envy and Malice?
A65856How now, John Pennyman, hast thou neither a regard to Men nor Truth?
A65856How plain is it that his Principle was against War and Fighting,& c. as not consisting with the Gospel of Peace?
A65856How require the Blood that has been shed in the Inquisition, but by fighting?
A65856How should the Army set up their Standard upon the top of Rome, but by fighting?
A65856Howgill, dyed in Prison, and that both E. B. R. H. and others were Prisoners when taken sick, and dyed?
A65856If it was I. P.( or suppose such an one) had S. C. acted the wise Man, in taking his Confession without such record with Hand and Seal?
A65856Is here either contradiction or temporizing?
A65856Is it between opposing an earthly Kingship over a Christian Church, and owning Jesus Christ as the only King, Head and Lawgiver to his Church?
A65856Is not the Gospel a Gospel of Peace?
A65856Now John, darst thou yet say that our acknowledgment and submission, as before, is Temporizing, or that they are Dissemblers and Deceivers therein?
A65856Now is not this to render us obnoxious as not being harmless, but such as would do them harm?
A65856Now where''s the Temporizing?
A65856Or did he temporize with King Darius, in saying, O King live for ever?
A65856Piott, George Bishop, George Rose and Miles Hallhead are all deceased?
A65856Salthouse done thee, that thou must needs go about to expose him too?
A65856Should not all Rule and Authority, be for the good and safety and well being of a Nation or Commonwealth?
A65856So when God has given one, is it temporizing or contradiction in us to own and submit to him, as far as we can with clearness of Conscience?
A65856The Railery he has belched out has not manifested us; can he not study and invent some worse and harder Language against us?
A65856Was not Israel governed sometime by Judges, sometimes by the Elders, and sometimes by Kings?
A65856We shall not dispute that now; must we be counted Temporizers, for quietly submitting to the over- ruling Power of God in this matter?
A65856Were not the Primitive Christians exhorted to be subject to the Higher Powers, seeing they were ordained of God?
A65856What a dirty, nasty thing it would have been, to have heard talk of a House of Lords among them?
A65856What art thou offended at our innocent plainness?
A65856What can his end be therein?
A65856What could be J. P''s Design in citing this Passage?
A65856What could be J. P''s Design in this Citation before, without Observation or Remark upon it?
A65856What has J. P. against this, when we went in the hazard of our Lives daily?
A65856What is this but Malice and Wickedness, to render me obnoxious and seditious to the Government, and so uncapable of so much as the Act of Indemnity?
A65856What people, setting these aside, could have had the Face and Confidence to have writ such Language as this?
A65856What people, setting these aside, could have had the Face and Confidence to have writ such Language as this?
A65856What, would not thy Malice suffer thee to let him alone, but thou must needs render him obnoxious for writing something to the Parliament and Army?
A65856Whereby it seems he wants Words bad enough for us, in so much that he is stopt( he saith): But how is he stopt?
A65856Why dost thou cover thy Deceit, desert Truth in any Case, and peevishly expose Conscientious Men, for formerly confessing it?
A65856and then where is the Temporizing?
A65856did not Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, yea and Daniel also, who were Children of Judah, serve and attend upon the King of Babylon in his Court?
A65856do not the Priests and Presbyterians,& c. cry for an earthly King?
A65856if you go on you are at the Brink of Destruction, and at the Sides of the Pit — was not Persecution ever blind?
A65856is it in denying Bloody Principles, and declaring our peaceable Intentions, to live quietly in Godliness and honesty under the King and Government?
A65856is thy Conscience wholly seared, since thy Essay towards the burning of the Bible?
A65856or that we would fight with Carnal Weapons for Christ, or for the establishing of his Kingdom and Government?
A65856or was their fearing God and honouring the King, a Contradiction or Temporizing?
A65856what a factious peevish Spirit is this we have to deal withal?
A65856where hast thou lost both Honesty and Wit?
A65856while he can not prove this, where''s the Contradiction?
A65856yea, did not Samuel''s concern herein exceed the occasion J. P. carps at?
A65860& c. What a New Rom ● under the English Protestant Government Strange Reflection?
A65860& c. Where''s now the Contempt of his Person?
A65860''T was Christ that died, but how?
A65860( And were not these Martyrs Christians?)
A65860( But who licensed his New Rome Arraign''d, with his Mock- Trial, Perjury and Pillory?
A65860A''s?
A65860A. put forth, to which I never heard that he had any Answer; and were not these thy Words Francis?
A65860And did not Christ''s Ministers comfort the otints who were in Trouble, by the Comfort where with they themselves were comforted of God?
A65860And didst thou find the Date of 1665, on the said Letters; or didst thou give it, or who did?
A65860And how could this be a Condemning the Martyrs and all Christians in thy Sense, unless thou concludest they were all for the payment of Tithes?
A65860And how proves F. Bugg, that this Advice was a Law made by our said Meeting, in opposition to the Law made by the King and Parliament?
A65860And is a Person made up of Body or Flesh only?
A65860And is not that Honour Eternal, which God gives, and is from above, and wherewith he Honours them, that Honour him?
A65860And is not that Seed Christ?
A65860And is not the Word of Faith, Christ in Spirit?
A65860And of the Washing of Regeneration?
A65860And pulling thy Neck out of the Collar, and winding thy self out of Sufferings?
A65860And that his Life Reigns,( i. e. the Life that G. F. partook of,) Is not Christ the Life of all his true Believers and Followers?
A65860And what Cause or Ground of Suspicion hast thou for these Ca ● umies?
A65860And what hurt should we ● o therein pray?
A65860And what then?
A65860And what was his intent in proposing such a Choice?
A65860And where do the Quakers say, that to preach out of them,( i. e. the Holy Scriptures) is Conjuration?
A65860And where have I contemned or opposed this Doctrine?
A65860And which of you are able to make it appear, by comparing of Ha ● ds to be his,( as printed by thee) as thou sayest?
A65860And who hinders such whose Consciences are for the Payment of them, if there be any such?
A65860And who then abolished tha ● Law that gave the Priesthood a right to tak ● them?
A65860Another Instance Bugg has against us, That our Books be spread up and down the Nation,& c. And what Usurpation or Justling with Authority is this?
A65860B''s Words, what Blasphemy or Idolatry was in them; as believing G. F. Instrumental in the Lord''s Love for his Souls Comfort?
A65860But F. B. was not thou about that time quarrelling with S ▪ Cater, about the Fifteen Pound Fine?
A65860But I say his ● ords are general, that by this the Quakers 〈 ◊ 〉 condemned the Martyrs, as well as all ● ● ristendom: And by what?
A65860But how know''st thou that?
A65860But of how long continuance, and till what coming of Christ is the Question?
A65860But what is this Usurpation so highly charged against us?
A65860Can my saying, The Lord has laid a necessity upon me, either to Preach or Write, prove that I am a Deceiver of the People?
A65860Can the Bodily Garment taken literally, be called Christ?
A65860Did not Paul say, I have fed thee with Milk, and not with strong Meat?
A65860Did not this tend to obstruct favour being shewn them?
A65860Didst thou by these Confessions, deny Jesus of Nazareth, who was born of the Virgin Mary, to be the efficient Cause of Man''s Salvation?
A65860Didst thou when a Quaker ever hear the Quakers Deny Christ to be the efficient Cause of Man''s Salvation?
A65860Didst thou when a Quaker, deny Jesus to be the efficient cause of Man''s Salvation?
A65860Ell ● oad done thee, that thou art so peevish and bitter against them?
A65860Else how could we be born again of incorruptible Seed?
A65860For where did they make a Law against publick Assemblies, gathered in the Name of Jesus Christ to worship God?
A65860Has he not herein reflected upon the Government, and aspersed the King and Parliament?
A65860He considers not he knows not what?
A65860Here again thou pervertest and abusest us: Where did we ever say, that he who so suffered, was not Christ, but a Body, a Vail?
A65860Hereupon C. chargeth me with being very fallacious, ● … d with wilful wickedness; and why so?
A65860How Inadvertent and unjust art thou T. C. in this?
A65860How proves Bugg, that to be a true and entire Copy of John Audland''s Letter to G. F. which he cites, p. 30?
A65860How sillily hast thou deduced many Inferences of this kind against us, as if thou wert minded to be Litigious?
A65860I challenge Bugg to prove where the Quakers gave these Titles to the Person of George Fox, or that he assumed them to himself?
A65860I deny thy Charge again; Wherein a wicked Forger?
A65860I deny thy Charge,( the Terms thereof considered in the common and evil Sense,) But why a Publick Defamer?
A65860Is it not as true literally, as a Man''s Gar ● ent can not be the Man himself that wears it?
A65860Is not a Monstrous Womb as bad as a Monster?
A65860Mayst thou not be ashamed of thy false abusive Charge?
A65860Now F. B. Dost thou in Conscience believe that G. F. assumes this to himself, or that he himself made the World?
A65860Now could this be any Contempt of Holy Scripture?
A65860Now pray how will this prove G. W. a wilful Liar?
A65860Now thy great Charge is turned to Suspicion: For shame give over such Envious, Trifling, Doting, Shatter- headed, Confused Work?
A65860Now was not this like an Informer?
A65860Or how doth that Seed remain in him that''s born again?
A65860Or that he himself enlightens every Man?
A65860Pray what Humility has F. B. shewn herein?
A65860Query, Who issues out Summon''s for the King''s Subjects?
A65860Secondly, And what Subjects are they?
A65860That Conformity is a Monster,& c. And yet in about Two Years after, he himself turned about and conformed?
A65860That G. W. promised in Print;( and what?)
A65860Thirdly, My Answers to thy Offers, with my Exceptions against the partiality of thy terms, why didst not print them?
A65860Thou appearing then of the sa ● e ● ud gment, why art now so shy of thy own A ● opted Birth or Monster?
A65860Thus thou in 1686: How canst thou in Conscience alter and turn this to what thou thought of us in 58 and 60?
A65860Was not John''s Baptism with Water, a Figure of Christ''s Baptism with the Spirit?
A65860Was this Pride, Insolency or Imperiousness in him?
A65860Was this to deny him that suffered on the Cross to be Christ?
A65860We can never call the Bodily Gar ● … t Christ, p. 26,& c. And what then?
A65860Were there not Elders worthy of double Honour?
A65860Were these Blasphemous or Idolatrous, supposest thou, F. Bugg?
A65860What Blasphemy and Idolatry canst thou prove against W. P. and others, in their Book Judas and Jews, and in excusing Josiah Coa''s Letter?
A65860What Blasphemy and Idolatry provest thou against John Blackling''s Testimony, that G. F. was blessed with honour above above many Brethren?
A65860What Contempt to Christ, or Denial of him was such Say ● ● g?
A65860What Divine Attributes did G. F. assume to himself, in saying he wrote from the Mouth of the Lord, or that he was cloathed with Righteousness?
A65860What Terms were intended to G. Fox, where his Name is not mentioned?
A65860What great Error then can F. B. prove against us therein?
A65860What is a Person truly and properly?
A65860What makes a Monster, but something Monstrous; and is not that which is Monstrous, a Monster?
A65860What more plain and innocent Testimony could Man have given?
A65860What profound, heart- seeing Judge hast thou T. C. ● ade thy self herein?
A65860What worse than Impostors and Sorcer ● ● as Simon Magus was?
A65860What''s false?
A65860What''s he then in calling me only Whitehead, and another Fox, and another Ellwood, and another Richardson?
A65860Where did J. P. say that the Fles ● or Body of Christ, is of an Earthly, Perishing Nature, p. 27. though ours be?
A65860Where dost thou prove that the Person of our Lord Jesus consists of Flesh, if none do oppose his Flesh or Body, to his Soul or Life?
A65860Where is the Term Flesh, understood the Person of ● ur Lord Jesus?
A65860Where proves he these Words?
A65860Where then is the falshood in our confessing Baptism and the Lord''s Supper, in the Figure and Substance?
A65860Where''s the Assumption?)
A65860Whether was greatest, the Sufferings of the Quakers, or the Sufferings of Christ?
A65860Whether was the Sufferings of Christ, or the Sufferings of the Quakers greatest?
A65860Whether was the sufferings of Christ, or the sufferings of the Quakers greatest?
A65860Which of you are so expert in his Hand, that you can make it so appear ex certa scientia?
A65860Which was greater?
A65860Who termed G. F. the great Apostle of Jesus Christ?
A65860Why didst not re ● ct it at first, but hugg''d it so long?
A65860Why does he no answer T. Ellwood?
A65860Why not our Books be spread as well as his?
A65860Wilt thou stand to this Proposition yea or nay, according to Bugg''s said Charge and Allegation, in his Sheet?
A65860and p. 81?
A65860and what Laws and Edicts do we make?
A65860and what difference pray between calling Conformity the Monstrous Womb, and Conformity a Monster?
A65860are they Spiritual, or the Substance which is Christ?
A65860canst thou give us worse?
A65860eng Bugg, Francis, 1640- 1724?
A65860is this 〈 ◊ 〉 Undervaluing or Contempt to Jesus Christ?
A65860or to Con ● emn his Person?
A65860what a gross Perverter art thou F. B?
A65860what because he writ that F. Bugg was turned Informer, a Self- Condemned Apostate?
A65860● ● d may it not be as true figuratively, as Christ''s Flesh was the Vail?
A65849& c.] Or, be any comfort ● ble Doctrine to any that truly desire perfect freedom from sin, and not to live any longer therein?
A65849All ye Baptists answer me, what Scripture had he for that?
A65849And Christ at God''s right hand, that he thus would exclude, limit, and seem to confine them out of all men?
A65849And I ask, Is that Word the Scriptures, or Letter, which thou sayest Christians are nursed with the sincere Milk of?
A65849And as Christ said, What and if ye see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?
A65849And did not the holy Men of God call him the Word?
A65849And did they blind the Truth, or make a Monster of Christ, supposest thou?
A65849And for what end were they brought into the world, if a capacity of Salvation was not afforded them?
A65849And hath he not it only dwelling in the Light?
A65849And have any it out of him, or out of his Light?
A65849And how did he appear unto Paul?
A65849And how plainly contradicted in confessing the Son of God was from the beginning, and was then?
A65849And is not Christ in the true Believer where the Body is dead because of sin?
A65849And is not its Salvation deliverance and safety from sin, wrought within by the Power and Arm of God?
A65849And now I Query, What Reason is it this Opposer would have us make use of, and what is the ground of it in man?
A65849And that all must be condemned who can not own you in your imposed Shadows, called Ordinances, upon pretence of the Scripture being your only Rule?
A65849And their knowledge not to be divine, nor after the Spirit?
A65849And was not the end of Paul''s labouring with the Jews, to turn them from Darkness to the Light within?
A65849And was not this He( the only begotten of the Father) that said, I was set up from Everlasting?
A65849And was not this before Mary, or Christ''s outward- birth of her?
A65849And were they not either accused or excused before God by his Law written in their hearts?
A65849And what Scripture have Baptists for saying that the New- Testament- Letter is to be our Rule?
A65849And what a denyal of his Divinity, like the old Hereticks?
A65849And what a narrow limitation doth this put upon his Spirit, to allow him his path but only where the Scriptures are?
A65849And when God and Christ are said to dwell in them, dare J. N. say they are divided from their own Being?
A65849And when thinkest thou shall that be?
A65849And where provest thou these words in the Scriptures, That the will of God is contained in them?
A65849And where provest thou this Doctrine?
A65849And, where hast thou these words, Personal being, in thy Rule?
A65849And, who art thou that wouldst limit the infinite being of God from his place and habitation in his Saints?
A65849Are the Scriptures and the Spirit inseparable?
A65849As also between the Ministry of the Word( which is the preaching Jesus Christ) and the Writings of the Two Testaments?
A65849As to his calling it a natural Light, what rule hath he in Scripture for so calling it?
A65849But hath he it not only as more eminently and above all others?
A65849But, hast not thou often essayed to have laid another Foundation for Faith and Assurance, even the Scriptures, or the Letter?
A65849Can any come truly to know the true God, or Jesus Christ, without immediate Revelation?
A65849Can he then think that Bibles grew and multiplied?
A65849Did not he distinguish between them?
A65849Do you judge that none hear his Voice but such as you plunge in Water?
A65849Do you own the immediate Teaching of the Spirit, or divine Revelation to be attainable in these dayes?
A65849Do you think the Spirit is to be received in the Scriptures?
A65849Does Milk flow from Letter, or Spirit?
A65849Doth His being with the Father, or at His right hand in Heaven, hinder Him from being in his People?
A65849Doth not this oppose the Infiniteness and Omnipresence of God, and Jesus Chri ● ● ●, ● nd bring them under the limitation of finite creatures?
A65849For first, Where provest thou in all the Rule( thou pretendest) That the Scriptures are the Touchstone and golden Rule to try the Spirits by?
A65849For where doth the Scripture say, That Christ shall come the second time in Person to save?
A65849For, hath not God Immortality above and before all others?
A65849How then is the Letter the only Rule?
A65849How was Heaven, and Earth, and the VVorld made by the VVord of God?
A65849I ask, If the Son of God was not Christ?
A65849If God, and Christ, and Holy Spirit be within them, then there is none above them; Is not this spiritual pride?
A65849If t ● is were considered, it might be some stop to them from ● uch intruding, as, How He appeared among the Disciples when the Doors were shut?
A65849In order to Righteousness, Life, and Salvation?
A65849Is not the Soul in man?
A65849Is not the true beginning of Believers, in that Spirit?
A65849Is not the will of God Infinite?
A65849Is not there a manifest difference between the Word( that made all things) and the words spoken, or writ?
A65849Is not this Rantism in the highest, that your Brother hath affirmed?
A65849Is the Essence or Being of the Son of God, Personal?
A65849Is there no distinction between the Word and words?
A65849John N ● wman, where''s thy Reason, and what and w ● ence is it?
A65849May it not be here implyed, that he hath a spiritual being?
A65849Must all the S ● ints have their Hope, Expectation, and Faith for Salvation of their Souls unanswered till then?
A65849Or Presbyterian or Independant Teachers, or such- like, go?
A65849Or if my Spirit perswade me to believe the Popes mouth to be infallible?
A65849Or, That it can not be separated from the Letter, according to thy words before?
A65849Or, are none true Babes but who have the Letter?
A65849Or, that he shall Reign in Person, or Personally Reign?
A65849Or, that the Letter and the Spirit are inseparable, yea or nay?
A65849Or, the Anointed of God?
A65849Or, when you carry a Bible in your pocket, do you carry God and his essence there?
A65849See what a deadly blow he hath given to his( and their) own Cause?
A65849T. D. replied, Would you question whether there were such a man as King Henry the Eight?
A65849THe Question disputed on both times was, Whether the Scriptures are the only Rule of Faith, yea or nay?
A65849The Kingdom of God was within the Pharisees; Christ saith, It is within; but this Man saith, Not within: Shall we believe Christ or him?
A65849The New- Testament Letter is to be our Rule?
A65849Thou hast scofft herein without any ground, and thereby discovered thy own folly; For, Is not the Incorruptible Seed a pure Seed?
A65849Was his perswading them to believe in Christ, in opposition to his Light within?
A65849Was not his Being Divine, before his Incarnation or Appearance in Person?
A65849Was this a fit comparison for their Assertion of the Scriptures being the only Rule?
A65849What Confusion is this?
A65849What Word was this that the Devil taketh out of mens hearts?
A65849What a gross Error is it to affirm, That Christ was not from the beginning;( or that he was not the Word in the b ● ginning?)
A65849What a pitiful narrow Spirit and Principle is this among them?
A65849What if my Spirit lead me to Mahomets Rule?
A65849What ignorance, narrowness, and pinching work art thou found in, who hast so tyed up all to and in the Letter?
A65849What is the key of true knowledge?
A65849What makes this for thy purpose?
A65849What place is God in where his Being is not?
A65849What say you Baptists and Professors?
A65849What then, Doest thou think that the Spirit is essential in the Writing?
A65849What was the Rule of Abel, Enoch, Abraham, Moses,& c. their Faith before the Scriptures were written?
A65849Whether the Scriptures are the only Rule of Faith, yea or nay?
A65849Whether the Spirit that gave forth the Scriptures, be a sufficient Rule and Guide?
A65849Who is so ignorant as to deny the sufficiency of God''s Spirit?
A65849Why?
A65849and above all Divine Illuminations?
A65849and doth it not tend to lead into Atheism?
A65849and doth not the Apostle call the Seed Christ?
A65849and how would it answer either that Light or Reason that is in them?
A65849and so, that all that have the Scriptures, must needs have the Spirit?
A65849and that he can be, and is a Rule in it to his People, as He is their Way to walk in?
A65849and what was God''s End therein, if it was insufficient?
A65849before the Earth?
A65849do you own this doctrine?
A65849how hath the Devil deceived such wilful Opposers and Unbelievers?
A65849how ignorant are these Opposers of the Scriptures, and of the Power of God?
A65849in good men) in that the blessed Spirit doth dwell in his Children, and direct them in his most holy Will; and is not this their Rule then?
A65849is God any where without His real Being?
A65849or, that the Scriptures made all things?
A65849seeing there are diversities of states written to?
A65849the Letter?
A65849think or imagine concerning God His right hand and being?
A65849those things contained in the Law, written in their hearts, when they had not the Law or Scriptures outwardly?
A65849was that Rule the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, or Bible, yea or nay?
A65849what is become of their Souls all this while, since their decease, if they have not received the End of their Faith, to wit, Salvation in them?
A65849which this ignorant man makes no distinction between; for was not the Apostle Paul a Minister of the Word, though not of the Letter?
A65849who in effect reflects on them all, as for speaking improperly;( what bold presump ● ion and pride is it in him?)
A65849● ow should they be left without excuse?
A65874( But dare he say that Jacob Behoman owns his doctrine herein?
A65874( How ignorant and confus''d doth this our Opposet shew himself?)
A65874( strange doctrine) Mayst thou not herein as well exclude Christ as his Spirit( who are One?)
A65874* O ● ght there not rather to be enjoy''d a Deliverance upon it, Ipso Facto?
A6587422. granted to his appearance in Believers, through Faith by his Spirit for Salvation?
A6587430?
A65874And after what manner dost thou pray to God?
A65874And are not his Works in his People as acceptable to God as ever( being true in him and in us) from the dignity of him that worketh them?
A65874And because the Chastizement of our Peace was upon Christ, does it therefore follow, That we must never be chastiz''d?
A65874And can any Law or Light, then what is Divine, and of a Gospel Nature, discover it?
A65874And darest thou say, That God had not Love to M ● nkind before he sent his Son in the Flesh?
A65874And did not David call to, and beseech God, to save him, and to shew Mercy unto him, long before Christ( as of Mary) was born?
A65874And did not the Apostle know him to be their everlasting Salvation, Justification, and Redemption?
A65874And do not these Groanings imply an inward and spiritual suffering?
A65874And hath not the Grace of God, which brings Salvation, appear''d unto all men?
A65874And he that hath not the Son hath not Life: How amply hath both Christ and his Apostles testified of his being in his chosen Ones?
A65874And how then can God condemn any for sin, if thy Doctrine be true?
A65874And if all these things are so purchas''d and perfected without for Sinners, or the whole World, what must be the Spirit''s operation within?
A65874And if thou deny''st him come in the Flesh, art not thou an Antichrist?
A65874And must the Spirit of God have no Hand or part in this?
A65874And of whom did God purchase Salvation, according to thy strange manner of Expre ● sion?
A65874And that he Existeth outwardly bodily without us, at God''s Right- hand: What Scripture Proof hath he for these words?)
A65874And then, What, and where, is God''s Right- hand?
A65874And was not Christ spiritually crucified in Sodom and Aegypt?
A65874And was not the ingrafted Word that which sav''d the Soul?
A65874And was not this in the Name of the Lord Jesus, who is the Elect, the promis''d Seed?
A65874And what Name or Title dost thou go under?
A65874And what if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up, where he was before?
A65874And what is Hosanna?
A65874And what is his then, but an old Devil- working spirit?
A65874And where doth the Scripture say, He is outwardly and bodily glorified at God''s Right- hand?
A65874And whereas concerning the Law or Light in every man, he instanceth, Doth not even Nature it self teach?
A65874And whereas thou queriest, By what Scripture can I prove that Christ died for a Seed in man that needed Redemption, which Seed is Christ in every man?
A65874And whether, while Persons are at enmity, they be then actually reconcil''d?
A65874And which hast thou more Honour''d, Him, or Mary?
A65874And who ever said that they were?
A65874And who were they that said, Is not this the Carpenter, the Son of Mary?
A65874Answer how antichristian it is?
A65874Art thou a Presbyterian, or a Presbyterian- Independant, or both?
A65874But do not the Papists honour him as much as thou, in their frequ ● nt calling him the Son of Mary, as thou hast done?
A65874But have not some of thy Brethren confessed, That Sanctification and Justification are inseparable Companions?
A65874But is it not Sin, and its Enmity within, which Christ came to redeem and reconcile man from?
A65874But when one said unto Christ, Behold thy Mother and thy Brethren stand without,& c. He answer''d, who is my Mother, and who are my Brethren?
A65874Did he not come in the Flesh?
A65874Did he so justifie Sinners by his Death, and after rise again, either to add to their Justification, or do it over again?
A65874Did the Apostles preach a false Christ, or another then the true?
A65874Did they Honour him in those Expressions?
A65874Do these termes express the Glory that he had with the Father before the World began, in which he is now glorified?
A65874Dost thou ask Forgiveness for thy sins?
A65874Dost thou not expect a perfest Sanctification, and Deliverance from Sin till after thou art deceas''d?
A65874First, Whether or no the Throne of David, which was promised to be given him to sit upon, be an outward Throne?
A65874For did not he, even Jesus Christ, take on him the form of a Servant, according to plain Scripture?
A65874For that is ● ot of the Nature of Forgiveness: And what doth Christ make intercession for?
A65874For, can any be justif ● ed, or made Righteous, without the work ● f the Spirit, or Seed of God within?
A65874Hath he not herein done that by another, which he would not have done by himself?
A65874How came he to speak of the Son of God then?
A65874How ● art thou not asham''d thus falsly to charge us, and yet a few Lines after, in contradiction to thy self, to clear us again?
A65874I beseech thee forgive me my Debts?
A65874I would ask this man, Whether this Nature he speaks of was pure or impure, corrupt or incorrupt?
A65874If David then call him Lord, how is he his Son?
A65874If thou dost not, how art thou in the Method of the Gospel, and how art thou perfectly justify''d?
A65874Is Marriage an Argument of Imperfection?
A65874Is it for something he hath purchas''d and compleat ● d with God already?
A65874Is it good Doctrine to say, That men are perfectly justified while under the Wrath of God?
A65874Is it not Anti- christian Doctrine, to deny this enlightening true Light to be Christ, and to scoff at us for asserting it?
A65874Is it not, Save now I beseech thee?
A65874Is not the Seed sown to bring forth the Fruits of Righteousness?
A65874Is there any higher Power, then the Eternal Power and Godhead?
A65874Is this a sufficient Argument against Perfection?
A65874Know ye not, how that Jesus Christ is in you?
A65874M ● rk now, where is the Contradiction between G. F. and I?
A65874May we not rather look upon thee to be an Antinomian, Presbyterian, and Independant?
A65874Nay, doth it not rather make more against thee; that the Servants of Christ meet with such Exercises for the Work''s sake, which is not for sin?
A65874Note Note Notes for div A65874-e4700* Why did he not call Mary the Mother of God( as Papists do) which to be sure is not Scripture Language?
A65874Now I ask, Was this a Natural Seed?
A65874Now how absurd would it be to question, Doth the Image and Glory of God need to be saved?
A65874Now was not this the true Christ, whom David in spirit call''d Lord, before he took upon him Flesh, or came of his seed?
A65874Now what it is that whereof he should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the Last Day?
A65874Now what think''st thou?
A65874Or are men justified, when no good is wrought in them by any Light or Spirit whatsoever, as thy Doctrine was, and is?
A65874Or he in his working within, be no cause hereof?
A65874Or if it be not effectual, till it be made so in us, was it not in- effectual before?
A65874Or is either Eating, Drinking, Bodily Sickness, or Death, an Argument of Imperfection?
A65874Or that the Love of God was not the previous Cause of his so sending his Son, and of Christ''s Testimony and Works in the dayes of his Flesh?
A65874Secondly, Whether or no he shall outwardly Raign in Person?
A65874Thirdly, Whether or no his Kingdom, that shall have no End, be an outward Kingdom; seeing Christ said, My Kingdom is not of this World?
A65874Thou desir''st me to ask the Boyes in the Grammar School, whether was reconciling, and hath reconciled, do not both denote a time past?
A65874Was Adam imperfect in Paradice, when Eve was given an Help- Meet for him?
A65874Was he not the Son of God, before he took Flesh in the Virgin''s Womb?
A65874Was not Christ within, the Mystery?
A65874Was not this still ● ● ● ist that John testified of, that was the true Christ that enlig ● ● ● ● s every man that comes into the World?
A65874Were it not as good Doctrine to say, That they are imputatively saved while actually Damned?
A65874What Confusion are you still in?
A65874What strange Nonsensical Language is this?
A65874What''s Attoneing, but making Peace and Quietness; and Redeeming, but a delivering from Sin and Bondage, or rescuing from the Enem ●?
A65874Where is his Pretended- love; or Friendship, or his Equal- dealing?
A65874Will it be on this side the Grave, yea, or nay?
A65874Will not the Boyes of the Gammar School tell thee, that that it is in imperfect time; and signifieth the Action begun, but not ended or perfected?
A65874Will these Pretences excuse thee?
A65874Will this man never leave his Confu ● ion, and self- Contradiction?
A65874affirmeth; for we are said to be sanctified through the offering of the Body of Jesus,& c. Yet who will say, we were then sanctified?
A65874and all other Professors, Whether Enmity and Reconciliation do not differ?
A65874and if he came in it, was he not in it?
A65874and if he was in it, was he not manifest in it?
A65874and what gross Antinomianism, and liberty in sin, would this man lead People into?
A65874and where did the Apostles so often( or ever) use those Expressions, Jesus Christ[ God- man, the Son of the Virgin Mary?]
A65874if it be a freeing from Iniquity?
A65874is it visible, or invisible?
A65874or rather, art thou affraid to confess him, because of the Pharisees?
A65874or that Christ and his Sufferings will indempnifie and acquit you, living and dying in your Sins and Pollutions?
A65874to the end: Now if thou should upbraid him, or such, with being imperfect because of such Sickness, what a peevish pitiful Argument would it be?
A65874with such cross and peevish Aggravations against him?
A65874within us, or without us only?
A65874words be not Antichristian, and he an Antichrist and Deceiver, yea, or nay?
A70779''T is True, and you say well, Oaths only serve till Truth- speaking comes, and you say, it is come to you; But how shall we know that?
A70779* This was Chrysostom''s Exhortation Now it s said, How can we Trade without an Oath?
A70779A. Thou wilt say that also concerning thy Wife; How is it now Adultery, which was sometime suffered?
A70779Again, Let none say to me, What if any lay on me a Necessity of Swearing?
A70779And how doth he swear by himself?
A70779And how should those Honest Men invent one?
A70779And how then is it not Confusion, that a Christian must be instructed, that he must not swear?
A70779And if it was of Evil, how was it commanded in the Law?
A70779And of thy Right Eye; What if I have a Delight in it, and be inflamed with the Love of it,& c.?
A70779And thou shalt Swear the Lord liveth in Truth and Righteousness, and Judgment,& c. And how doth the Gospel forbid us to Swear?
A70779And what if he do not believe?
A70779And what more effectual Remedy can any People propose against the notorious Abuse and evil Consequence of Swearing, then Truth- speaking?
A70779And what was this, tell me now?
A70779And what''s the Meaning of a Writing?
A70779Answer me in Truth now: If I had sworn alwayes, and at every season, what Priviledge would my Principality have?
A70779B. Wilt thou allow the same also to me?
A70779But Paul also swore, as they say?
A70779But he feeds daily Forswearers and great Swearers, and will he give thee up to Famish, because thou hearkenest to him?
A70779But in the Laws which Men command thou darest alledge no such thing, as, What if this or that,& c?
A70779But much rather, why should we be imposed upon?
A70779But such Distrust ought not to reign in the Faithful: But if we trust not Words, what should an Oath do?
A70779But this is not so, nor can any think so: For God sweareth by none; for how can he, seeing he is Lord and Maker of all things?
A70779But thou sayest, We have heard that God himself sometimes swore: The holy Scriptures record that; But is there any thing better then God?
A70779But thou wilt say perhaps, What shall I do; he neither doth nor will believe me, unless I Swear?
A70779But what do I speak of these?
A70779But what shall I say of Oaths of the Courts that are left?
A70779But what wilt thou say to me of the old Covenant?
A70779But what wouldst thou have?
A70779Can it any way be changed?
A70779Come, tell me for what Cause an Oath was introduced, and why it was allowed?
A70779Darest not thou that art initiated touch the holy Table?
A70779Do we therefore think we do not sin, because they are not punished?
A70779Dost thou give to some as Infants a kind of first Food, that they may at length receive a succeeding kind of Meat?
A70779Dost thou make that Law an Oath, which forbids to Swear?
A70779Doth he fear God, or doth he not fear him?
A70779For, if one would have a more Venerable Man, would not the Case have Disgrace in it?
A70779For, tell me, Thou halest a man to an Oath; What dost thou seek?
A70779HOUT, that exceeds all Iniquity and Audaciousness: What then is to be done?
A70779Hast thou therefore received Letters and Badges that thou shouldst lose thy Soul?
A70779Hath he forsworn?
A70779He may swear, who can not repent of his Oath: And what did the Lord swear?
A70779He that brings the Fire by which an House is burnt, is he a Stranger to the Burning?
A70779He that makes no Conscience of that Law that forbids Lying, will he make any Conscience of Forswearing?
A70779Hear, ye CLERGY- MEN, who bring the HOLY GOSPELS for men to swear upon; How can ye be secure from that Oath, who sow the Seed of Perjury?
A70779How can they ever hope to look their Lord with Comfort in the Face, who so severely Treat their Fellow- Servants?
A70779How just and severe a Censure is this out of an Heathen''s Mouth upon the Practice of Dissolute Christians?
A70779How low is Man faln from the primitive Rule of Life?
A70779IF TO SWEAR IS FOUND TO BE DEVILISH, how are they to be punished who Forswear?
A70779IF TO SWEAR TRULY BE A CRIME, and a transgressing of the Commandment, where shall we place Perjury?
A70779If an Oath be forbidden to men, and a man imitates God in not Swearing, how is it that God is related in the holy Scriptures to swear?
A70779If he be not faithful in Word, how will God by any means be the Witness of an Oath for him, who is destitute of Faith, to which God hath Respect?
A70779If it be a great Good, not to Swear at all; what is it to Impose an Oath?
A70779If it was not lawful for all to Name God simply, how great Audaciousness is it to call it in Witness?
A70779Is God absent by this Means?
A70779Is Religion placed in a Leaf?
A70779Is it because an Oath ministred unto Freemen is as it were the Rack& Torture tendered unto them?
A70779Is it not that they speak like Men?
A70779Is it that we abuse that simply, this not so?
A70779Is that Impossible?
A70779Lastly, If thou shalt impose on any a Necessity of Swearing in the holy House, how horrible an Oath dost thou enjoyn, if thou dost so?
A70779Let us now discourse concerning the Jewish Law to day: What is that, will he say?
A70779Make God, the Great God of Heaven and Earth our Caution in worldly Controversies, as if we would bind him to obtain our own Ends?
A70779Moreover, Who gave Power to Popes, to break the Command of God?
A70779No, said the Bishop; and why?
A70779No, thou seest that it is not for this: What gainest thou then, tell me now?
A70779Ought not one even to Dread when God is named?
A70779Paul Hungerd; and do thou chuse rather to Hunger then to transgress any of God''s Commandments: Why art thou so Unbelieving?
A70779Perjury is a Denying of God: What need of God in this Matter?
A70779Say, So may I not be blind?
A70779Shalt thou chuse to do and to suffer all things, that thou mayst not swear, and shall not he Reward thee?
A70779Surely it doth not prohibit an Oath, but requires a true one?
A70779Tell me now, How are Parrets known?
A70779Tell me now, how great Madness is it?
A70779Tell me, my Friend, What dost thou get by Swearing?
A70779That Christ is a Priest forever: Is that Uncertain?
A70779The Word Hypocrisie signifies thus much, that which being one thing appears another; How then falleth he into Hypocrisie that sweareth?
A70779Then said the Bishop, Why wilt thou not swear before a Judge,& c?
A70779Thou a Worm, Dust and Ashes, and a Vapour; darest thou snatch thy Lord, who art such an one for a Surety, and compellest to accept him?
A70779Thou hast lost both thy self and him: But hath he not Forsworn?
A70779Thou wilt say; How can it be, that the same is sometimes Good, sometimes not?
A70779Upon the Brink of a Precipice, or far from it?
A70779We would fain know, if a most August Act of God''s Worship be nighest the Pit''s Brink, or farthest from it?
A70779What Evil is it then to hale men back again upon Penalties?
A70779What Evil therefore hath Swearing?
A70779What Fruit gets he that often sweareth?
A70779What Oath dost thou leave to us?
A70779What do I speak of a Fellow- Servant?
A70779What doth it say then of OATHS there?
A70779What if I use an Oath Unwillingly, but to free me from Danger?
A70779What if an Oath be written, and not pronounced with the Voice?
A70779What if she be Nice and Curious?
A70779What if the Books of the holy Scriptures be not used?
A70779What if we be drawn by Necessity to give an Oath?
A70779What is this but to contradict the natural Tendency of the Command of Christ and his Apostles?
A70779What is this less then, Swear not at all?
A70779What more?
A70779What serve they for then?
A70779What shall we say then?
A70779What so great thing hast thou gained, as that which thou hast lost?
A70779What then is to be done, if any require an Oath, yea, compel to Swear?
A70779What then shall we say is beyond Yea and Nay?
A70779What then shall we say to these things?
A70779What then, if I shall shew thee, that it is not this only?
A70779What then?
A70779What then?
A70779What then?
A70779Where, sayes he, wouldst thou chuse to walk?
A70779Whether an Oath be an elicit Act of Religious Virtue?
A70779Who ever spake more seriously then our Saviour?
A70779Who more necessary things?
A70779Who said so?
A70779Whom therefore do you more believe, me that do not swear, or them that do swear?
A70779Why didst thou not rather Dye?
A70779Why doth the Law command, that they should swear by God?
A70779Why must Neither by any other Oath be added after such a plain Prohibition, as, My Brethren, Above all things Swear not?
A70779Why then shall this be said to be of Evil?
A70779Why therefore do they record that he swore?
A70779Why?
A70779Will you learn why they allowed them of old to Swear, not to Forswear?
A70779Wouldst thou also learn on the contrary, how those things are not fit for a Child, which are not for a Man?
A70779Wouldst thou have him to Forswear?
A70779],[ London?
A70779but being gone out, thou wouldst not touch the Head of thy Child; but touchest thou the Table, and doest not dread nor fear?
A70779or rather because every Oath endeth with Detestation and Malediction of Perjury?
A70779or who reaches a Sword, whereby a man is slain, is not he an Accessory to the Slaughter?
A70779thus, But some will say, If any be forced to swear, what is to be done?
A70779to Deceive?
A70779— What then, if any require an Oath, and impose a Necessity of Swearing?
A70779— Where is there any need of an Oath to him that so lives, as one that is attain''d to the height of Truth?
A65834( True thus far; but how?)
A65834( What says our Adversary to these Annotations?
A65834* The Act of shedding that outward Blood was by the Spear which the Soldier thrust into his Side: How proves he that Act cleanseth from Sin?
A658341?
A658342?
A65834After[ it being no more a Body] to leave out[ of Flesh Blood and Bones] and then how would[ but a pure Ethereal or Heavenly Body] stand or co- here?
A65834Again, Doth not the Name Christ belong to the whole Body, and to every Member of the Body, as well as to the Head?
A65834And Christ at God''s right hand, that he thus would exclude, limit and seem to confine them out of all Men?
A65834And all Men to honour the Son, as they honour the Father?
A65834And are not many reproved by the Light them in, for telling Lies and speaking contrary to the Word?
A65834And as to Christ''s Substance and Nature, what does our Opposer mean thereby?
A65834And have not the Assembly at Westminster, confessed as much as G. F. says?
A65834And if he said, The Scriptures do not tell the People of Three Persons,& c?
A65834And now to come to the Point, How or wherein have I slily insinuated Excuse and Defence of it( i. e. of the Heart of Hersie, as before?)
A65834And suppose any one in deep distress for want of Christ to free and save him from Sin should earnestly enquire, where shall I find him?
A65834And that he is now this day a Man without all other Men?
A65834And the Bread which we break, it is not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A65834And then how is his Spirit the only true saving Light within us?
A65834And then, among divers other Scoffs and Flouts, goes on; Is not this very hard Fishing for Infallibility?
A65834And told them the Cup of Blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A65834And was not the Prophet Elijah mistaken when he thought himself alone, or none in Israel but himself, that was zealous for the Lord God of Hosts?
A65834And what Scripture have they for these?
A65834And what of all this?
A65834And what proof is made of this against me?
A65834And what then?
A65834And what thinks he of Godfathers and Godmothers?
A65834And what''s the consequence?
A65834And what, and where is God''s right hand?
A65834And where doth the Scripture say, he was outwardly and bodily glorified at God''s right hand?
A65834And why so?
A65834And yet confessing the Father, Son and Holy Spirit to be always One?
A65834Answer, Say not in thine Heart, who shall Ascend into Heaven, that is, to bring Christ down from above?
A65834Are not the Son and Holy Ghost of the same Substance with the Father?
A65834Are not these Divine Attributes, and very high ones too?
A65834Are such led by an infallible Spirit or no?
A65834Are they Jews?
A65834Are they fallible or deceivable?
A65834As for our Womens Meetings, what has the Scorner against them or their Services, more than his own Ignorance and Scorn?
A65834As for what the Righteousness of Faith saith?
A65834As to such strange, preternatural Distortions he talks of, where did he see them among the Quakers?
A65834But as we are not such Fools as curiously to enquire what?
A65834But do not the Words only Salvation by Christ''s outward Blood, exclude any other means of Salvation?
A65834But doth not the Name belong to the whole Body( and to every Member therein) as well as to the Head?
A65834But is there no Light before Morning, pray?
A65834But is there no Light in the Creation before Morning, either inward or outward, pray?
A65834But is this Adversary really for John''s Baptism, or for baptizing as John did?
A65834But now if they be not Three Beings, nor Three Substences, how well have these Men defended a principal Article of their Faith?
A65834But then to beg the Question, What was it you called Dust and Serpent''s Meat?
A65834But to preserve, excuse or defend it?
A65834But to whom does the Man apply this Enthusiasm which he renders Fancy, more strong in mad Men and height of Madness?
A65834But what Proof is offered of these monstrous Heresies, or covering them?
A65834But what saith it?
A65834But what saith the Answer of God unto him?
A65834But where''s his Catalogue to prove a greater number of Quakers have run quite mad, than among so many of all Mankind?
A65834But which is the greatest?
A65834Can they be Christians who Blaspheme the Bible?
A65834Can they be to blame herein?
A65834Dare he judge them horrid Blasphemy?)
A65834Did I ever say that I am Jesus Christ?
A65834Did any Body ever say, That these were not Dust?
A65834Did not the Light shine in Darkness, before it shined out of Darkness?
A65834Do not all that truly fear God partake of the same Spirit and Wisdom?
A65834Does it follow, That the Quakers do not acknowledge that there were Three in Heaven before Christ was born, as( he saith) it seems?
A65834Does not the Sun shine in our Houses, because the Body and Fulness of it is without them?
A65834Doth Christ''s being with the Father, or at his right hand, hinder him from being in his People?
A65834Doth not this oppose the Infiniteness and Omnipresence of God and Jesus Christ, and bring them under the limitation of finite Creatures?
A65834For how oft is the Candle of the Wicked put out?
A65834George, what a blessed Spirit would''st thee have thought Satan, if thee hadst seen him when he was transform''d into an Angel of Light?
A65834Had Paul then any Pricks of Conscience, or of his Light within against the lawfulness of that wherein he was fully persuaded and zealous?
A65834He argues against some, and reprehends them as Fools that questioned How the Dead are raised, and with what Bodies do they come forth?
A65834His story about one Archer in Wilts, questioning, whether he was not among the Quaker- Bishops, who compos''d this last general Council?
A65834How has he distinguished in this Point?
A65834How has the Devil stolen from them the Body of Religion, and left a noisome Carcass behind?
A65834How many Debauched and Wicked, both of the Clergy and others?
A65834How many of his own Church have run mad?
A65834How oft is Destruction upon him?
A65834How will he reconcile himself to his condemning us in this Case?
A65834I say, this was not the Question we controverted then: But, whether the same numerical Body, of Flesh, Blood and Bones that dies, shall be raised?
A65834I should rather answer the Question according to the Testimony of Moses and the Apostle, Whither shall I be directed to go to find Christ?
A65834If he be all Justice, where is his Mercy?
A65834If thou dost, thou mayest look until thy Eyes drop out, before thou wilt see such an appearance of him?
A65834Is God any respecter of Persons?
A65834Is it Visible or Invisible?
A65834Is it just to reproach all for this one Man''s Offence?
A65834Is it to confess Jesus Christ come in the Flesh,& c. according to holy Scripture- Testimony of him?
A65834Is it visible to the carnal Eye?
A65834Is not that a part of God and of his Being, which came out from God?
A65834Is not the divine Nature, the Deity in him, greater than the Manhood?
A65834Is not this Affirmative, pray?
A65834Is this any good Argument against the Principle it self?
A65834May not such his Work be very grateful to the Popish Interest?
A65834Must not then saving Grace be applyed er''e the Soul be Converted or Healed?
A65834My Question to R. Gordon as Cited: Dost thou look for Christ as the Son of Mary, to appear outwardly in a bodily Existence to save thee?
A65834Now have I herein attributed no more to Jesus Christ than to my self, as he saith?
A65834Now how difficult is it to make Sense of this Man''s Notion of the Light within?
A65834Now the Question is, Whether Figure may be made synonimous to Example, for the words Example or Figure, as before?
A65834Now we challenge this obscure Adversary to prove, where ever the Quakers, or their Ministers, held these blasphemous and atheistical Notions?
A65834Or because some of them have run Mad, would he and the rest be so deemed?
A65834Or of them in whose Mouths was found no Guile?
A65834Or, Is that any part of the Controversie betwixt us?
A65834Or, if none are Saints and Partakers of the Spirit of Truth or divine Wisdom, but Kings?
A65834Or, that Christ is not a Man, without all other Men, as well as spiritually in them?
A65834Or, that I suffered Death upon the Cross at Jerusalem?
A65834Or, that I was born of the Virgin Mary?
A65834Or, whether both these are not one?
A65834Or, whether there are not many Words contained in the Scriptures, which were not spoken by Inspiration of the Holy Spirit?
A65834Or, who shall Descend into the Deep; that is, to bring Christ again from the Dead?
A65834Pray how proves he that the Quakers call Christ without, but the History or Shadow of the Light within?
A65834Quere, Was this to deny Christ to have any Bodily Being?
A65834Quere, When, or where, do the Quakers so joyn with those Emissaries?
A65834Query, But were Christ''s Apostles instrumental in ministring the Spirit?
A65834Received ye the Spirit by the Works of the Law, or by the hearing of Faith preached?
A65834Seeing we confess, That Christ is now in Heaven; when did ever we refuse to confess, that there is any Jesus now in Heaven, or any elsewhere?
A65834There''s a mis- understanding also of G. F. in the Case about his questioning, Is not that a part of God which came out from God, and of his Being?
A65834To the Question, Whether a Man can sin while he follows this Light?
A65834Wade''s calling The Holy Ghost a Person?
A65834Was it not that he held That the Son of God had his beginning of nothing?
A65834Was it nothing else but the Ink and Paper?
A65834Was not Samuel a good Man and a Prophet, and yet mistaken, when he took Eliab for the Lord''s Anointed?
A65834We would ask him, If none are indued with a divine Sentence and unerring Judgment but Kings?
A65834What Heresie or Fallibility is in this, pray?
A65834What Prophets, and how many, did so resolve?
A65834What a blasphemous, scornful and defaming Wretch is this?
A65834What a cordial Friend then does he shew himself to the Protestants?
A65834What a strange, confused Whimsie is this?
A65834What can he make of it?
A65834What fulsom Stuff is this?
A65834What fulsom, popish Stuff is this?
A65834What great Authority is this?
A65834What other Scripture have they so set up against those?
A65834What room then is there for God''s Mercy?
A65834What scripturally to confess Jesus Christ and the Holy Scriptures( as above) is this no Contradiction to Heresie?
A65834What''s Heresie than, pray?
A65834What''s more plain, than that here was Teaching and Baptizing with the Holy Ghost, accompanying his Ministry?
A65834When did ever the Quakers so advance themselves, to be one Person, Substance, Soul with God, and equal even to God?
A65834Where did I ever attribute this to my self?
A65834Where did we ever say, That Christ being born of the Virgin Mary, and suffering under Pilate, were not without us?
A65834Where do they say, That Christ''s Body either was or is of an earthly perishing Nature?
A65834Where''s the meer Fallacy?
A65834Where''s then the Blasphemy?
A65834Where''s then the difference?
A65834Whether the first Pen- man of the Scriptures was Moses or Hermes?
A65834Whether they believe in such a Christ, as without them?
A65834Whither will not Pride and Envy precipitate some Men?
A65834Whither will you direct me to find Christ?
A65834Whose Body then but his own, when he was visibly seen to ascend, so as a Cloud received him out of their sight?
A65834Why do they break off and separate from our Communion upon the pretence of the Light within, wherein we agree with them?
A65834Will J. Pennyman adventure to stand by these stories and aggravations against us?
A65834Will nothing satisfie this Incendiary, but Persecution and Ruin to Dissenting- Protestants?
A65834Within us or without us only?
A65834Would this Accuser be so dealt by, from the gross Miscarriages of many of his esteemed reverend Brethren of the Clergy?
A65834[ Here are Lyes, and gross Calumnies accumulated against us] Why should these be reputed as Christians?
A65834for shame, who can not see such Malice and Madness as my Adversary has vented against me in this Matter?
A65834poor George, Is the infallible Quaker dwindled down to a meer Gypsie or paltry Fortune- teller, to nothing but a little Skill in Physiognomy?
A65873* What a Body is that without Blood in it?
A658731. from whence then was the efficacy to Salvation derived?
A658732. without God and Christ in the world, what then can such turn to within for Life and Salvation?
A6587328. whereas if that be his Justifier and Saviour, where is it?
A6587340. and S. E. his saying then, It was no more than the blood of another Saint, the one being not of continuance no more than the other?
A65873And I ask, if Spirit be not the Essence of that which is spiritual?
A65873And are not the directions of the Spirit according to the Scriptures?
A65873And can that which is of such infinite worth, as to purchase man''s eternal Salvation, be corrupted or lost, so as not to be in being?
A65873And did not Christ direct to the Kingdom of Heaven within, Luke 17. and to believe in the Light, that they might be made the Children of the Light?
A65873And did not Christ say, he that is with you shall be in you?
A65873And did not God say, Look unto me all ye ends of the Earth, and be ye saved, for I am God?
A65873And did not he herein the more exalt that Light which led them to fear God,& c?
A65873And did our Lord eye the Scriptures for his Rule, in his obedience, that here he is made the proof, who had the Spirit above measure?
A65873And does not the Word both sanctifie, save, and redeem?
A65873And had not they an Altar to eat at in the Heavenly Sanctuary?
A65873And have not some of them gotten into the Priests places, Pulpits, preached for Hire, Tythes,& c. as Tombs and others, when permitted?
A65873And how comes any to know, and rightly to understand the Scriptures but by the Spirit of God?
A65873And how could he then condemn man for not obeying him, if he hath not given him power to obey?
A65873And how hath he wrought off man''s disobedience by his suffering?
A65873And if the Jews had drunk the blood that was shed on the Cross, do you Baptists think it would have cleansed them from sin?
A65873And is it good doctrine to say, that that Blood( or Life) which sanctifies and justifies true Believers in all ages, is not in being?
A65873And is it the Baptists Doctrine to direct men to the material Temple, and Jeruselem, the Type for the Antitype?
A65873And must not people turn within for its help?
A65873And then what is the ground and cause of mans union with God?
A65873And then, can there be any true believing without obedience?
A65873And then, how did Christ die for all?
A65873And this may answer that Question, Where ever did God attribute the name of Blood to a Spirit?
A65873And was not he the true Christ, the Son of God, that so prayed unto the Father?
A65873And was not that in them which did beget them to God, — and bring them to be his Children?
A65873And was not this Gods real work throughout all the Generations of the Righteous?
A65873And what is Redemption but a freeing from the servitude of sin?
A65873And what is his saving his People from, but from sin?
A65873And what is it in the Conscience that they are a good savour to?
A65873And what is this Man Christ Jesus, who can satisfie, pacifie an Infinite God?
A65873And what were these Gospel- Ordinances and Gods Commands, that he sayes, Paul preached and practised in all his life?
A65873And when was that coming to be?
A65873And where do the Scriptures say, the Blood was there shed for Justification — and that men must be directed to Jerusalem to it?
A65873And where proves he that Faith and Obedience to the Gospel is no cause of Salvation, but the effects?
A65873And whether the Blood of God( and of the New Covenant) be not Spiritual?
A65873And why doth not our Opposer plead for his Water- Baptism and Seventh- day- Sabbath, here against us?
A65873As for the question of the Blood, wee''l pass that by,* Is the same Body of flesh and bones in Heaven?
A65873B. as well be thought guilty of little less than blasphemy, as S. E.( though I do not so judge either therein)?
A65873B. his saying, that the blood that was shed, is not in being, or comparing it with a price that is lost?
A65873Brother, will you perform the Duty?
A65873But a Saviour was born: what was he born for but to bear witness to the truth?
A65873But now he asks, Upon what bottom doth Conscience stand, or by what rule doth Conscience act?
A65873But then if it should be denyed that all men are justified by the sufferings and blood of Christ without: I ask, Why are not all?
A65873But unto whom shall I speak wisdom, or utter knowledge?
A65873But we are sure the righteousness of Faith does not say, Who shall ascend to fetch Christ down from Heaven?
A65873But what became of that Body that suffered, is it in Heaven, yea, or nay?
A65873But what is the price so much talk''d on, that both satisfies God and saves man?
A65873But what sayes he further to the matter, what capacity is fallen man in as to light and knowledge within?
A65873But whither he now seeth that looketh to another God and Christ, that is not to be found above the Clouds?
A65873But why tells he so much of[ above the Clouds] are not the Clouds, and circumference of the Heavens, as well under us as above us?
A65873By what is the true Believer so principled, if not by the Spirit, or Light of Truth within?
A65873Did he practise Water- Baptism all his life time?
A65873Does he require impossibilities, and then condemn man for not answering his requirings?
A65873Does not this contradict much of his Book against us?
A65873Does not this imply two Gods, and that God had a Father?
A65873G. VVhitehead asked him, What became of the Blood that was shed?
A65873G. W. Is that Blood still in being, yea or nay?
A65873G. W. Some man will say, How are the dead raised, and with what Bodies come they forth?
A65873G. W. The Question, How are the Dead raised, and with what Bodies come they forth?
A65873Has not this our opposer both undervalued the Light, the Guidance of the Spirit, and Christ himself?
A65873How received they the Holy Ghost?
A65873How then are they without excuse?
A65873How then does it cleanse, sanctifie, justifie, redeem, save& c. as he would have us beleive?
A65873How uncertain a rule or guide is the Light within, or the checks of Conscience for a man to build his Hope or Faith upon?
A65873I ask, Was this Child a natural birth( without either Spirit, Light within, or Godhead?
A65873I ask, Whether any thing is of eternal merit and worth that is not everlasting?
A65873I do much wonder where that Word or Doctrine was coyned that they so often teach and exhort; that is, to turn to the Light within?
A65873I would know where the Spirit, in so many words, is called the key?
A65873If Natural, then how is the Blood lost, or not in being?
A65873If not, How is it called his own Blood?
A65873Indeed thou hast egregiously missed and split thy self against the Light within — and how then is the Scripture thy rule?
A65873Is God to be confined, or the holy One to be limited, whose presence fills Heaven and Earth, and who filleth all things?
A65873Is Mercy still to cry afresh for, where Wrath is appeased, and satisfaction made,( as is supposed)?
A65873Is believing no part of the creatures obedience?
A65873Is it in Heaven without the Blood in it?
A65873Is it in Heaven without the Blood in it?
A65873Is it not the Spirit that doth so principle a man for his work, both in praying, hearing, and obedience?
A65873Is it that Blood that was shed outwardly in his Body?
A65873Is the same Body of Christ, that suffered on the Cross, in Heaven, yea, or nay?
A65873J. I. Wee''l pass by that Question, it may be it was left behind; Answer to the Body that was Crucified, whether it be in Heaven, yea or nay?
A65873Must they be condemned, and yet never have a Spiritual Light in them?
A65873No sure, if he did, it would render him a very hard Master, and what less hath our Opposer done?
A65873Notes for div A65873-e11650* What holy Place, and with what Blood?
A65873Now I ask, if they did live and remain to a personal coming of Christ in the Clouds yea or nay?
A65873Now things hoped for are to come; but were Christs outward sufferings to come, and not seen?
A65873Now what is that Glory of the Father in which his coming is?
A65873Now, did John see him with carnal eyes?
A65873Or did he pretend Scripture, or command for it, when Christ sent him not to it?
A65873Or is it good Doctrine to say, That God pacified God when he saw himself angry?
A65873Or were it good reason to say, We find Christ at such a distance, because we believe he is there to be sought?
A65873Or, whether it is but only a selected and chosen number that the Debt is payed for, and Salvation merited?
A65873Others deny the Blood to be in the Body in Heaven?
A65873Rep. A false conclusion: for man was created in the Image of God; And was not Christ the Image of the Invisible God?
A65873Rep. How then doth he say, I am God, a Saviour, besides me there''s none other?
A65873Rep. How then doth it hold that God could not save, and how would this divide God, and set him at a distance from himself?
A65873Rep. What efficacy?
A65873Rep. What nonsence and unscripture- like Language is this, to tell of God being Co- Creator with the Father, or that God had glory with God?
A65873So what less is it than Blasphemy, to say, God could not save?
A65873The Body which he saith was taken in the Womb of the Virgin; Was it in that capacity before the World was?
A65873Then how is mans obedience excluded, as not any cause of Sanctification, Justification, or Salvation, but an effect only?
A65873There is a Spirit in man, but the Inspiration of the Almighty giveth understandeth; and upon whom doth not his Light arise?
A65873Those that have not the Spirit to lead them, if the Scriptures be the Rule, what Rule have they?
A65873To what then shall such turn within for Light, that have there nothing but darkness?
A65873To which I say, What then shall be judge in this case?
A65873Was it not the Spirit, the Sword of the Spirit, the Shield of Faith, the Armour of Light,& c. whereby they were defended?
A65873Was not he that Word that created man?
A65873Was not the object and foundation of Faith in being through all ages?
A65873Was the Scripture herein his Rule, or the Spirit, which he was a Minister of?
A65873What can we expect from such a one, but the like reproaches and contradictions of sinners, that Christ Jesus the Captain of our Salvation underwent?
A65873What confusion and huddle- muddle has this our Opposer made about Salvation?
A65873What confusion and silly work has he here made against the Light within?
A65873What confusion, what a Laborynth and uncertainty is he in, and does he bring his Hearers into?
A65873What gross absurdity and nonsence is this he has put upon plain Scripture?
A65873What ignorance and contradiction is in this W. Burnet''s Religion — what sayes he to this?
A65873What is this, but to charge Christ with improper Doctrine, or impertinent speaking?
A65873What must become of them?
A65873What proof is this of delusion, or believing a lie, when nothing is spoken but this telling, that we appoint silent Meetings?
A65873What say you to it?
A65873What say you to the Question, do you deny it?
A65873What then was the rule to those Pen- men of the Scriptures in this writing them?
A65873What was the Rule before they writ them, and their Weapon and Defence against Satan?
A65873When sanctification, purging the conscience,& c. is a real work, can it be done by a thing that is not?
A65873Whence came he?
A65873Where doth the Scripture say, that Justification is the real cause of Sanctification?
A65873Where learn''d he this Logick?
A65873Where provest thou that he did take it up again?
A65873Where was the Light in the Order of Gods Work in the Soul before it was effected, if not at work in them?
A65873Whereas Christ said, he that seeth me, seeth my Father also: now dare he say, that God is such a visible object as may be seen by a carnal eye?
A65873Whereupon I may ask as well, if the name of Water was never attributed to the Spirit?
A65873Whether God be satisfied that the many offences should remain, and yet take the one Offering for a full discharge from the Penalty?
A65873Whether any mans Offences can deprive him of his discharge?
A65873Whether man be discharged of his debt whilst he lives in disobedience to the Light or Spirit of Christ within?
A65873Why art thou so positive against it then W. B. to oppose that thou knowest not whence it rose?
A65873Why did he not name this pretended Teacher?
A65873[ But then of what effect were the drops of Blood that fell from him in his Agony?]
A65873[ Did not W. Burnet learn this distinction of the Quakers Christ from Matthew Caffin?]
A65873[ Where do the Scriptures make such distinctions, or such Rhetorick?
A65873and by whose power was he a saviour?
A65873and could this be without an Offering or Sacrifice to eat of?
A65873and did not he say, I fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh, for his Bodies sake, which is the Church?
A65873and hath not he that is born of God the Seed in him?
A65873and how and from what did they work Righteousness, fear God, and receive acceptance with God?
A65873and how has he set himself, and his meanings to be Judge over the Scriptures?
A65873and how is it known?
A65873and how then is the Law and substance of the Ten Commandements in every man?
A65873and if Christ in his People be the Holy Spirit in them?
A65873and if some be justified in that state only by the Offering and Blood of Christ without, as is supposed, and not all that are in the same state?
A65873and is not that the Heaven of Heavens, or the chief Heaven, which is most near to God, most spiritual?
A65873and is not this Seed Spritual?
A65873and is there not obedience to it, in beleiving in it before man''s new creation in Christ be effected?
A65873and it''s said, he took part of the same that the Children had, to wit, flesh and blood, was not that[ he] the true Christ?
A65873and that the Spirit shall not alwaies strive with man?
A65873and the Spirit or Anointing within to teach — lead into all truth, and save from sin and death, which has reigned in people?
A65873and then, where is the Spirits work?
A65873and what Heaven is it?
A65873and where are the heavenly places the Saints were in, which Christ and the Son of man was in when upon earth?
A65873and where is that Blood?
A65873but had the Spirit been the Christ, what nonsence would it be to say the Spirit desended upon the Spirit?
A65873but then whence is this power of believing and obedience derived if not from the Light and Spirit of Christ within?
A65873did not God ever design the Spirit to lead into all Truth?
A65873did not the Prophets believe and follow the Spirit of Christ in them?
A65873does not this render God partial and unjust, if he withhold that from men which is both merited and purchased for them?
A65873had he any power but what was given him of the Father?
A65873how are they in the Fathers right hand?
A65873if obedience and reception of the Spirit be not the cause but the effect of that union, is not the true begining in the Spirit?
A65873is it Natural or Spiritual?
A65873is it in being, yea or nay?
A65873is it in being, yea or nay?
A65873is it now to be looked for outwardly?
A65873is it visible to the carnal eye?
A65873is it wrought off whilest man lives in it, and denyes Perfection, and Freedom from sin tearm of life?
A65873must not the Serpent''s head be bruised within, and the Seed be known within which bruiseth it?
A65873neither doth it act variously, when quickened, so as to reprove evil as before, how then does it act variously in the Heathen?
A65873or can it be reasonably thought to be a coming that is not yet, that they lived and remained unto?
A65873or do any eat his Flesh, and drink his Blood, who do not partake at this Altar of him as a Sacrifice; or the one Offering, which ended the many?
A65873or that men are justified in an unsanctified or disobedient state?
A65873or that they carried God in their arms, and had him not within them, if that Child was God- man( as he tearms him)?
A65873or was this coming such as you expect outwardly?
A65873or without any Spiritual birth, seeing the Light within, Spirit, and Godhead is so much excluded and excepted from being a Saviour?
A65873the Law written in the Heart, and the Spirit, in the inward parts?
A65873the Son of God was manifested that he might destroy the works of the Devil; And is not this to Salvation?
A65873was it a natural Heaven or a spiritual?
A65873was it from spirit or from flesh?
A65873what is it that can receive and close with their Doctrine in them?
A65873what manner of Saviour was he then?
A65873— And was not the Word within a Light which both Moses and the Apostles directed to?
A65873— I ask, who affirms that it doth?
A65879( Is this thy excellent Logick?)
A658797. and talked even till break of day: Where is this Sermon Recorded?
A65879A g ● owth and a fullness consistent with a body of Sin: Is this the Principle and Faith of the Kirk of Scotland?
A65879And did not Jesus Christ shew forth his power and preach the Gospel, before that of Mark was writ?
A65879And do you propose this to your Auditors as matter of comfort?
A65879And doth not the Light and Spirit, bring to the right use and end of the Scriptures which was given by inspiration?
A65879And how did the Saints truly and effectually know he was come, but by the understanding and Eternal Life he had given them?
A65879And if Marks declaration was the beginning of the Gospel, How are the Prophets writings the Gospel?
A65879And if it was the same that Christ devided and gave to his disciples; Was that the outward bread so given to both?
A65879And if the Anoynting within teacheth of all things; Must the Scriptures be a Rule to the Anoynting, that thou seemest to tye it to the Scriptures?
A65879And is he devided or imperfect in what he is to the Saints?
A65879And is not the Light, Spirit, Kingdom within, communicated before the Scriptures are truly understood and opened?
A65879And is not your Light( or that which you put for Light) darkness?
A65879And is the full recovery called conversion as thou sayst?
A65879And must that be reckoned for no coming?
A65879And was it inward or outward?
A65879And was that the Scriptures of the Prophets?
A65879And what is it God hath joyned that( thou sayest) we have wickedly s ● parated?
A65879And wherefore was Judas condemned then; Was it because God refused to give him saving Grace, or for his own transgression?
A65879And who is now guilty of damnable Popery?
A65879And yet other whiles they must expect to find Eternal Life in the Scriptures, to be made Wise unto Salvation by them; What contradiction''s here?
A65879And, Did not Christ say, I and my Father are one, and prayed that his might be perfect in one, as he and his Father were one?
A65879And, Did such fall into gross sins?
A65879And, Do not the Papists plead for their Traditions and Ceremonys against Protestants and others, in like manner as he hath done in this cause?
A65879And, Had not he Grace given him before, seeing that by Transgression he fell?
A65879And, Is Sanctification imperfect in this Life?
A65879And, Is this that thou callest inherent Righteousness?
A65879And, Was not its teaching their Rule then?
A65879And, What Scripture had they then to forbid Circumcision as they did?
A65879And, Who was the Authour of his Transgression?
A65879And, if the Gospel and Mynistry of Christ be one, How is the Scripture it?
A65879Are all unbelievers then, and have no Light in them but who have the Scriptures?
A65879Are they not mentioned distinctly as two?
A65879As for that by gone state before he was begotten; Was he groaning under a body of death?
A65879As oft as they did it, it was to shew the Lords death till he came; What coming, and when was it, or is it to be he intended?
A65879As you contradict your self, so you do the Truth; For can Sin be in any man, and the actions flowing, and the man not be Sinful?
A65879Both( ● or all) a Spirit, and yet distinct in personal Subsistance; Where learned you this Doctrine?
A65879But are the damned and reprobates such, because ordained of God so to be, or because Christ, died not for them( according to thy Doctrine?)
A65879But could not Christ discerne the Devils spirit without the Scriptures?
A65879But did th ● y go to teach Infants of a week old?
A65879But doth this prove that Judas had no sanctifying knowledg of Christ?
A65879But is that any part of your Religion to tell of God- fathers and God- mothers?
A65879Confusion, Are they both one?
A65879Did he not come again after he rose?
A65879Did he perform that which is good, yea or nay?
A65879Did nor he preach from the Light within, or Revelation of the Son in him?
A65879Do they consist together?
A65879Do ● h not this growth and fullness consist by Christ and in him?
A65879Doth it dye with the Body( seeing the Soul is pure when it ascends to God?)
A65879Doth not the Scriptures make us Wise unto Salvation?
A65879Doth not the substance end the shadows?
A65879Doth not this equally reflect upon Christs Apostles as well as us?
A65879Doth not this plainly confute thee, that what they said was from the holy ghost?
A65879Doth this prove nothing?
A65879Hast thou cleared Gods Children herein?
A65879Have all that hear Scripture read or preached, the knowledg of the Mistery of Christ without the Light within?
A65879Have any a Supernatural knowledg or faith of the Scriptures, who have not a knowledg of Christ?
A65879He will exercise his power in us, and yet not immediate; What contradiction''s here?
A65879How hast thou wrested plain Scripture herein?
A65879How ignorant hast thou shewed thy self in this matter?
A65879How miserably hast thou pleaded Gods Childrens cause?
A65879How obviously hast thou herein contradicted thy former Doctrine, for imperfection and sin till death?
A65879How provest thou that( for we deny it) and the ground of this thy peremptory censure and judgm ● nt, against all them that had not Scripture?
A65879How provest thou thy Call from Scripture, and that thou art Comissionated by Christ to Preach?
A65879How silly a ● d weak hast thou shewed thy self in this matter?
A65879How then doth the Apostles speak of the Revelation as before?
A65879How then was it received with all readiness of mind?
A65879How was it a mystery hid from Ages?
A65879If Sin be in a man, doth it not defile him?
A65879If believers be cleansed from all sin when they do believe; How have they it to war against, till they lay down this Tabernacle?
A65879If he did, Then knew he what he did?
A65879If he who is a Brother may offend in the day time; Doth it therefore follow that all the godly or brethren do fall into sin seven times a day?
A65879If not by the Light within, How by the Scripture without it?
A65879If so; By whom consists Sin and its body?
A65879If so; then, Why were they not directed to the Scriptures of the Apostles?
A65879If the Lord has given Grace and Knowledg equally to all men, Wherein stands the freedom of his Grace towards them that are saved?
A65879If the Scriptures and Gospel be one; How are they distinguished?
A65879If they can not Preach except they be sent, then who must send them and give them power for that work but Christ?
A65879If this doth nothing differ from what thou sayest, it s very strange, didest not say a little before[ upon his dying?]
A65879Is he made wholy free from Sin yea or nay?
A65879Is it Believers and Sin, or the advocate and Sin?
A65879Is it Christs yea or nay?
A65879Is it as impossible Faith should be otherwise then an imperfect creature as for a man to be essentially a beast?
A65879Is not manifest confusion, variation, and inconsistencies in these passages?
A65879Is not that in a Supernatural way, which is without Error and Jangling, and good and acceptable to God?
A65879Is not that oneness between the Father and the Son perfect?
A65879Is not the Father distinct from the Son and the Spirit, in the personal subsistance?
A65879Is not the Word of Reconcilliation Gods?
A65879Is that your pure Protestant Religion, that pleads for sin in all the facultyes of the Soul?
A65879Is the Bread and Wine the substance Then?
A65879Is this dangerous?
A65879Is this divulg''d in the Kirk of Scotland?
A65879Is this good Doctrine?
A65879Is this good Doctrine?
A65879Is this thy L ● arning and Logick?
A65879Is this thy Learning thou hast boasted of?
A65879Is this your pure Protestant Religion?
A65879Judas had part of the Ministry that the other Apostles had; and, Did not that proceed from saving Grace?
A65879Many of whom we believe were better then thy self; and hast thou known the best and wisest of them, that thou art thus positive against them?
A65879Mayest thou not here see thy error and confusion?
A65879Must we believe thy meaning contrary to the very words of Scripture, or were the whole world all the Elect?
A65879Nay, Had they not Scripture ra ● her for it?
A65879Now, What can be inferred from hence for sprinkling Infants?
A65879Of Faith being a habit, an imperfect creature, or accident; and, Is accident and habit all one?
A65879Or art thou their mouth; that thou takest upon thee, to be such a contender for the pure Protestant Religion( as thou callest it?)
A65879Or did he so walk all his Life time?
A65879Or did that Light come from them( or from Christ?)
A65879Or if it was before; Then did he not amend and become better when he came to be converted, to receive Grace and Apostleship?
A65879Or is not the body of Sin put off, where the Circumcision of Christ is experienced?
A65879Or is there not a time of confessing, repenting, and time of forsaking Sin?
A65879Or to be mockt at as thou hast done?
A65879Or was he the greatest or chiefest of sinners when faithful?
A65879Or, Did Peter intend they should all have their Children sprinkled before they were called?
A65879Or, Is not the teaching of the Anoynting Scripture, as well as it was in them that spoke Scripture from it?
A65879Or, Must not people believe the Anoynting, till they have searched the Scriptures to try it by them?
A65879Or, Was Circumcision the type of Infants Baptizme( so called?)
A65879Or, Was there not more in Christs words then the outward observation?
A65879Or, Were such the Believers that were Baptized?
A65879Or, Were the Scriptures of the Prophets more sure then the Apostles writings?
A65879Or, What Grace?
A65879Or, did he do he knew not what in it?
A65879Priest, Are the things written in the Scriptures, and the Scriptures two things?
A65879Priest, If all men are taught to know Christ by the Light within them, Why sent he Apostles to all Nations, to make them disciples?
A65879Priest, Is not that another Gospel, that all the world over are taught Christ and his Gospel?
A65879Priest, The Word you say is one, How can it be called those things?
A65879Priest, Who strengtheneth then the hands of wickedness?
A65879Repent and be baptized every one of you,& c. Were they Infants such as the Priests sprinkle, that he bid repent?
A65879Secondly, And Is it false and absurd to say, that Christs coming again was when he rose again?
A65879Secondly, And was it the Scriptures or the Law as it is in the Letter that discovered to Paul his sins and desires, or the Law inward?
A65879Shall we say they had the Sanctifying Knowledg of Christ who had not love to him, who hath not good will to him?
A65879So, Then the Scriptures are granted to be words of God, why then holdst thou debate against us, but to shew thy cavilling Spirit?
A65879Surely here''s darkn ● ss to be felt, Who can raise an absurdiy and confusion from this, grosser then it self?
A65879That the disciples had outward bread; Who denies?
A65879That''s not Johns sence but thine, which is as much as to say, his was not true; for do they continue in Sin, and yet Sin not?
A65879The Priests were wo nt to tell of a Regenerate part; What part is it?
A65879The evill one toucheth him not) prove any thing,& c. Do they not prove any thing?
A65879Therefore Are they not able to save us?
A65879This is a contradiction, or do t ● ey continue in it and still repent of it?
A65879This is a sad accusation against all Gods Children againe, and what is this but a pleading for sin, and tending to strengthen the hands of evil doers?
A65879This shews thy Shallowness, Pride and Conceitedness, And were not Peter and John unlearned men, and so accounted by the Learned among the Jewes?
A65879Those who had Christ the living bread, yet were partakers of the outward bread, as the disciples were; Were not the Corinthians Saints?
A65879Thou mightest as well say, that many words and one word are both one; Where provest thou thy assertion?
A65879To be unblamable; Is that Grace?
A65879To hold up holy hands without wrath and doubting, Do not you offer up a Cains sacrifice herein?
A65879Wa''st a first, or a second, or a third?
A65879Was God or he to be blamed therein?
A65879Was he giving thanks for victory through Jesus Christ?
A65879Was not this the good end of Christs coming?
A65879Was that Light within dim in those times, that it needed the help of outward Light?
A65879Were all they whom God should call Infants when called?
A65879Were not the Corinthians Saints, called in Christ?
A65879Were not the Prophets and Apostles of that houshold of God?
A65879Were the Corinthians then to eat and drink outwardly after their time, or so long after their deceases?
A65879Were they to use the outwa ● d Bread and Cup after they were dead then?
A65879What Righteousness( and whose) is it, which is the same with Sanctification, which is not perfect?
A65879What Scripture have you Priests of Scotland for that?
A65879What a feared conscience and shameless boldness have ye attained to?
A65879What darkness and error hast thou here implyed and signified?
A65879What excellent Logick is this?
A65879What greater promise can there be of freedom from sin, then to forsake the Devil and all his works, to be led by Gods Spirit to keep his Commands?
A65879What grose and fa ● se stuff hast thou implyed and vented?
A65879What is the Rule whereby the motions of the Spirit are to be tryed whether they be such, or the motions of Satan and our deceitful hearts?
A65879What is this less then to say, Paul said not true, when he said, It s not I that sin but sin that dwelleth in me?
A65879What sayes Antichrist, Satan and his Agents and Sophisters to it?
A65879What then are they that Rebel against the law, if they that obey it be wicked?
A65879What then, Are men Saved, Englightned, and Sanctifyed by that which is imperfect?
A65879What''s done upon his dying?
A65879What, all the faculties of Gods Children, having sin and corruption in them?
A65879Whe ● e provest that?
A65879When then do they overcome?
A65879Where do the Scriptures call it a Light of a natural Conscience?
A65879Where hast thou learned this, amongst the Popish Traditions and Reliques?
A65879Where learned''st this Phylosophy to define Faith?
A65879Where learnedest thou this distinction?
A65879Where provest thou by Scriptures, that sprinkling Infants is the Initial Seal of the Covenant?
A65879Where provest thou it was denied to Judas, or that Judas had no part of the same Grace?
A65879Where provest thou that they searched the Scriptures for what they determined, before they said, it seemed good to the holy ghost and us?
A65879Where then remained the necessity of the shadow, or outward Representations( or Mementoes as some calls them?)
A65879Where''s then the fruits and effects of true repentance?
A65879Whether it be Gods Grace to Peter denied to Judas?
A65879Whether these things were so?
A65879Who is it, that hath put the difference betwixt Peters believing, from Judas mis- believing?
A65879Who must send them if there be no immediate Teaching or Revelation now?
A65879Will thy telling us so often of Judas clear thee or confute us?
A65879Ye say; Must the Scriptures be the Rule to discern or try false Spirits when they speak Scripture?
A65879call what he wrot, the Gospel?
A65879in the Scriptures) is laid down as following believing?
A65833''T is a Question whether ever he Converted one Soul to God in all his Days?)
A65833( How little has W. R. ever known of the Work of Christ''s Ministry?
A65833( as he saith) where some were present not accounted to be of the People called Quakers?
A65833( for the true Church neither pretends nor claims any other) if she hath, then whether such Sentence be not obligatory to other Believers concerned?
A658331st, If you own W. R. his Printing, and what he has Printed on that subject?
A658331st, Wherein have those Meetings declined the Service of Truth?
A658332dly, If you own his Reviling so many Friends and Brethren in Print, as he has done, several by Name, and others not by Name?
A658332dly, Then why not to be accounted the Church, if two or three gathered in Christ''s Name be the Church?
A658333dly, Had he no Counsel, Advice or Encouragement from you, or either of you to Print his Book?
A658333dly, How comes W. R. to UNCHURCH them, and yet they approved by his Friends?
A658333dly, We desire to know, who it was that desired thee to give that Certificate?
A658334thly, How can every Member be in the same Faith, if they believe not as the same Church doth?
A658334thly, Whether thou gavest any order to W. R. to put thy Certificate in Print against G. F?
A658338thly, IS HE DEPUTED BY YOU?
A65833And The Spiritual man judgeth all things; the Saints shall judge the World; Know ye not, that we shall judge Angels?
A65833And can he think that none of them could shew Reason for such Advice and that from their own Knowledge, who were Persons of more Credit than himself?
A65833And could this be any other than in his Will?
A65833And dare he say, there is not so many as two or three that gather together in Christ''s Name among us?
A65833And did W. R. Print these thy Letters by thy Advice or Order?
A65833And does W. R. in point of Judicial Proceedings, allow of an Accuser or Informer to be a Competent Witness?
A65833And dost thou own his Printing them, or not?
A65833And doth not this square with such whom he compares us to?
A65833And hath the Church of Christ no Power to give forth any Commands or Precepts that are binding to Conscience?
A65833And how False and Inconsistent with himself is he in these matters discovered to be?
A65833And in Commendation of the Tree of Knowledge,( to prove it good for Food) to add, that''T is EVIDENT that Knowledge is the Way to Life?
A65833And is not this Pope- like, or Antichrist- like?
A65833And now Samuel Hollister, how comest thou to expose thy Ancient deceased Uncle''s Name in such a Certificate as this?
A65833And then whether there can be any Just pretence for a Believer to refuse to submit, as not seeing that his duty which is Just and Equal?
A65833And what New and Unchristian Doctrines or Practices are they fallen into?
A65833And what are his chief Allegations against the Mens Meetings of our Friends?
A65833And what if some, as he saith, have reflected on the Wisdom that is Sensual, when they have declared, the Tree of Knowledge not good for Food?
A65833And what probable Circumstances hast thou given in thy pretended Testimony?
A65833And what though some others were present, and heard it read?
A65833And wherein judge Angels, but in higher things than those of this Life?
A65833And whether William Rogers did not assent or give way to their so doing?
A65833And whether it be not Contradictory to J. W. and J. S. their Testimony, cited by himself against TYTHES?
A65833And whether it was by your advice or consent that he Printed them?
A65833And who among the Children of Light do not see these to be needful, as well as serviceable?
A65833And who induced N. C. and R. A. to make and give out their Certificates upon a Private Discourse so many years after?
A65833And why does W. R. take no better notice of the Advice given by the said Subscribers, for Reconciliation?
A65833And why should he advise them to purchase or buy the Tythes of the Priests?
A65833And wouldst thou be thus dealt by?
A65833Are none of them now worthy of the Name Church, in his Esteem?
A65833Are not his Contradictions various and manifold?
A65833At this rate he may make large Books against us; but to what purpose, thus to Say and Unsay?
A65833At what an easie rate can he Defame and Expose Friends by Name to publick censure in Print?
A65833But before he gave this Judgment and exposed those Certificates in Print, did he Examine and hear all the Parties concerned Face to Face?
A65833But hath not N. C. appeared an Accuser of G. F. as being more Guilty himself,& c?
A65833But hath not W. R. placed the Publication of his Book upon a higher Motion and Necessity, than the occasion pretended of the aforesaid Epistle?
A65833But then we ask, If such be not of the Church, seeing he seems not to own them that had the Rule to be the Church?
A65833But then, how if they do not depart from Christ?
A65833But to the occasion of N. C''s Certificate, aforesaid, What kind of Discourse could be between him and G. F. that he could ground HIS CHARGE upon?
A65833But touching G. F. how Silily and Impertinently doth W. R. argue, to prove him of a High and Lofty Spirit?
A65833But, Thirdly, How does he consist with himself, in relation to the Paper which he sayes is accounted the Foundation of the Separation in the North?
A65833Can it be good Doctrine to say, that the Serpent perswaded Eve to that Knowledge which is the Way to Life?
A65833Canst thou deny this to be thy Answer?
A65833Could THAT be the Knowledge that God forbad Man to eat of?
A65833Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to Law before the Unjust?
A65833Dare he say, that to believe in God, as the true Church believes, is Unsound Doctrine?
A65833Did God forbid man( in Innocency) the knowledge of his Maker?
A65833Did God forbid the Knowledge of himself?
A65833Did W. R. know his Parentage?
A65833Did he Examine and hear all Circumstances on all hands relating to the Accuser and Accused, face to face?
A65833Did he hear G. F. and N. C. and R. A. face to face, and G. F. answer for himself, and make his own Defence before them?
A65833Do ye not know that the Saints shall judge the World?
A65833Doth our Law judge any man before it hear him, and know what he doth?
A65833Doth the Church in the fear of God Will any other submission than Christ wills in his Church?
A65833First,[ Without the Assent of the Parties Differing] When did any of us so pretend a Power to remove the Difference?
A65833For is not the most holy Faith a Spiritual matter, and relating to Conscience?
A65833For what time, or how long could they sell them, or give them Title to them?
A65833HAVE YOU IN TRUSTED YOUR CAUSE WITH HIM, to Mannage, as he doth?
A65833Has not W. R. counted them such formerly?
A65833Has not he here assumed a Power and Jurisdiction above the Church of Christ?
A65833Has not this been the way of our Profest Enemies to render some Friends Admirers and Adorers of Persons or Creatures, setting up Man,& c?
A65833Hath the Priest the Tythe any longer than for his Life?
A65833Have not some ancient and faithful Friends said this, who have ended their dayes in Peace?
A65833How came thy Letter in Print, wherein thou hast shewn so much Harshness and Severity against G. F. and those thou slightly termest HIS COMPANY?
A65833How comes it to pass, that divers among you called Quakers,& c. — teling us, that the Tree of Knowledge was NOT good for Food?
A65833How does he oppose the will of the Church to the Will of the Lord?
A65833How tender is Common Law and Justice in such Cases?
A65833However some Objecting may say, What is this to a Light Within?
A65833I asked him, When it was that I should bid him buy off his Tythes, and what Year?
A65833If Christ and his Church be not divided?
A65833If W. R. should Object or Question us about wording this Treatise in the Plural, in using these terms W E and US,& c. as in whose Name it is written?
A65833If not,( as we are apt to think he did not) then what gross Hypocrisie, Irregularity, as well as Unfair and Unchristian Dealing, is he guilty of?
A65833If we be asked, how we prove that to be the Spirit, against which we are now engaged in this Treatise?
A65833Is it possible such bitter Invective words should proceed from J. W. against his Elder Brother, and other Friends?
A65833Is not W. R. Partial in his History, in not citing and publishing that Paper, as he has others?
A65833Is not he herein condemned out of his own Mouth?
A65833Is not this a manifest Untruth?
A65833Is not this a very fair Confession?
A65833Is not this to account all outward Government Antichrist''s?
A65833Is this W. R''s concern of Conscience, to write thus sordidly?
A65833Know ye not that we shall judge Angels; how much more things that pertain to this Life?
A65833Nicholas Lucas asked him, If he would Engage he should give him a Meeting?
A65833No sure ▪ Who then presented the Tree of Knowledge as good for Food to be eaten, to make one Wise,& c?
A65833Oneness in Faith, Oneness in Doctrine, Oneness in Practice, Discipline, Order and outward Forms of Government?
A65833Outward Order and Gospel- Discipline in the Church?
A65833Query, And why may not these Meetings be accounted the Church, or any of them a Church of Christ, when gathered in his Name and Fear?
A65833Query, But do these Meetings most usually consist of such Persons Uncertain in Qualification?
A65833Query, VVhat publick Meetings are frequently thus served?
A65833Query, What Counsel, if not tending to decide the Difference?
A65833Query, Whether W. R. did not know in his own Conscience that he had proceeded to Print his Book some time before the 8th day of November, 1680?
A65833Query, Why hast thou omitted to mention the Names of some Persons and Authors of some Books and Papers reflected on in this Treatise?
A65833That all his Treatise, excepting Postscript, Index and Errata, was then already Printed?
A65833That the Apostacy shall never enter the Generality more?
A65833That they are Persecuting Opposers, who oppose J. W. and J. S.[ VVould W. R. be counted a Persecutor for his opposing others more vehemently?]
A65833The Question still is, If some of those Parts were not published in single Parts, as before?
A65833Then is not this Prophet( meaning Christ) to be in man to give forth his Law,& c?
A65833This we take to be a Dark and Causless Reflection: Whom doth he accuse with this frequent Exhortation, and Design of Imposition?
A65833VVhence came that Desire, but from the Serpent''s allurement?
A65833VVhere is then the Imposition?
A65833Very well; and was not this the Will of the Church, so to submit in the fear of God?
A65833Was he then meet to expose himself to stand in the Streets, when Friends were either haled out, or kept out of their Meetings in the Streets?
A65833Was it not for many Years since he went abroad to preach the Everlasting Light?
A65833Was not this counsel in the Church of Christ under the Gospel, as well as in the Church of the Jews under the Law?
A65833Was there any thing said about Buying off Tythe on any account?
A65833Was there no Outward Directory in that Paper which J. W. and J. S. with above Eighty Persons more, signed?
A65833We are sensible that many Friends will be even startled at this, and ready to query, Are there any such amongst the People called Quakers?
A65833We dare say, this is a Forgery of his own contrivance: When did any of our Assemblies so tell their Fellow- Members?
A65833Were ever worse things exposed in Print against us before?
A65833Were not this very Absurd, to render the Serpent more kind to Man than his Maker was?
A65833What Confusion would this make in the Church, and Contradiction to Christ''s own Sentence?
A65833What Form or Discipline do we practise that is unsuitable to these Righteous Ends?
A65833What Power then has he here allowed the Members of Christ''s Church in these cases more than to any Heathen man?
A65833What danger can there be of any such Repute?
A65833What kind of Preacher would he make, if he should tell People, The Tree of Knowledge is good for Food?
A65833What knows he but it had a good Effect on some of them?
A65833What unsoundness can he prove therein, as to the Allusion?
A65833What would this man be at?
A65833What''s now become of W. R''s contest against outward Order, Discipline, and Form of Church- Government, visible,& c?
A65833When was he so in God''s Choice, and truly Honourable to W. R?
A65833Where are those Printed Terms?
A65833Where was his Justice?
A65833Where''s then the Apostacy charged, as to Doctrine, Life of Christianity, Principles of Truth,& c?
A65833Whether EVERY CASE be to be limitted only to WORLDLY MATTERS, and not extend to any Cases or Offences of a Spiritual Nature?
A65833Whether W. R. can prove, that any of those Monethly or Quarterly Meetings among Friends, are not gathered together in the Name of Christ?
A65833Whether it relate to Spiritual or Temporal matters?
A65833Whether that Sensual Wisdom was not produced in Man by that Transgression?
A65833Whether thou G. F. didst not advise Nathaniel Crips to buy his Tythes both of Priest and Impropriator?
A65833Why does he not detect such Preachers, if there be any such, but thus Defame and Scandalize our Meetings with them?
A65833Why then does he upbraid him for not labouring with his hands, ever since, whilst able,& c?
A65833Why then not a Heathen Man to the rest of the Church, if they may justly be esteemed as Heathen Men, that would not submit to the Churches Counsel?
A65833Why will he admit of no outward Government in the Church, called Christ''s Government?
A65833Would he Unchurch them all at once?
A65833Ye shall not surely dye?
A65833Yes, a far higher; and what is it?
A65833[ How now N. D?
A65833[ VVhat new Prescription?
A65833and how uncertain is that?
A65833and if not for the Children of Light to walk by, then what Children was it made for, and that observed it, until the Separation became more apparent?
A65833and of what Credit with impartial Readers?
A65833and that before such time as he had exposed and promulgated their Certificates, and his Censure and Judgment against G. F. upon them?
A65833and their Affairs and Business Invisible?
A65833and their Records and Orders Invisible?
A65833and their respective Meetings, with the Methods they intended therein Invisible?
A65833and whether or no thou dost now approve of his so doing?
A65833but how has he kept to it?
A65833does he know?
A65833for these are not the Shell; Has not W. R. been greatly Instrumental to make the Breach wider, and to encrease the differences?
A65833has not W. R. much pleaded for this Method?
A65833how comest thou in Print, as a Witness for W. R?
A65833how many degrees were they meaner than his own?
A65833how much more things that pertain to this Life?
A65833if so, why does he come at any of them then?
A65833if the Exhortations, Reproofs and Instructions( which he also grants) be not binding on those other Believers?
A65833or command him not to eat of that which was good for his Souls Food?
A65833or did he do it Voluntarily on his own Head?
A65833or doth he make himself Officious, as one seeking Popularity therein?
A65833or has he more Charity for the Customs and Fashions of other Societies than for ours, which he has for so many Years owned and been in?
A65833or hath he therein presumed for you, without your order, he having greatly concerned you in his Book?
A65833or to the Knowledge of the true God, and Jesus Christ, which is Life Eternal?
A65833or what cause for any to think so of the People call''d Quakers, as that the Doctrine and Life of Christianity were wholly extinct?
A65833suppose this were true?
A65833that Knowledge which is the Way to Life, to Man, in that state of Innocency in the beginning?
A65833that''s but one in the Singular, else- where''t is Prescriptions in the Plural: And who are so judged, that so stand?
A65833the Knowledge which is Life Eternal?
A65833were only the Hearers, and not the Preachers the Church?
A65833what admonished against Tythe, and at the same time advise to the buying off Tythe?
A65833what then?
A65833where is the Antient Love, Tenderness and Regard to the Honour of Truth?
A65833† Can this be justly Insinuated, when many of them had heard both Parties at Drawell, in Matter of Fact?
A65833† Gross and Abusive Insinuations; what better than to render him an Epicurian or Gluttonous Person?
A65870& c. How grosly Erronious and Contradictory art thou in this point?
A65870& c. Some may ask me, Why I take notice of such confused, muddled, blind, dark and mad Stuff, as his appears to be?
A65870* Q. added, If it be not Dog- Latin?
A65870* What Scripture hath he that saith His Soul was the Woman''s part that dyed?
A65870* What Scripture hath he that saith His Soul was the Woman''s part that dyed?
A65870* Who must so exercise and proceed in them if no visible man or men be invested with Power from Christ to execute them, or put them in practice?
A658701 st, That the true Church is in the true Faith that is in God; And darest thou deny this?
A658705 thly, And what if it be reputed, That G. F. originally called Ministring Friends to General Meetings Yearly?
A658705thly, What Cry for Justice is it thou complainest hath not been hearkned unto in London, when relating to G. F?
A658706. of what validity is the authority, sentence or power of the Church with W. R?
A65870Against whom did he alledge this, when we never questioned Christ''s Government in his Church?
A65870And did he not call the Galatians BRETHREN?
A65870And does our Adversary believe, that nothing may be said to be Eternal, that had a beginning, as to Man?
A65870And dost not thou on this very occasion retort his words[ Let us fly Rome at Home?]
A65870And dost thou indeed judge, that we have endeavoured to take away thy Credit by such kind of Treatment?
A65870And dost thou under such an abominable and odious Comparison thus expose them to the Magistrates, for their Meetings, to be torn to pieces?
A65870And doth not this imply that the Serpent was more kind to Man in moving to eat of it, than his Maker was in forbidding him?
A65870And has he not counted them Persecutors, yea, a Company of Persecutors?
A65870And hast not thou confessed that we are reconciled by his Death, so we shall be saved by his Life?
A65870And how Inhumane, tending to add to these our Afflictions?
A65870And how do these Comparisons against him, and thy rendring him a Persecutor of his Brethren, agree with his being Dear W. P. This Noble man,& c?
A65870And how easie is it to make Books at that rate?
A65870And how rarely hast thou mended the matter now?
A65870And how variable dost thou render his Spirit, and contradictory to it self in these great concerns of Tythes and Marriage?
A65870And how were the Pope''s proceedings in that respect, far more just than our Friends?
A65870And is not this matter of Fact, to set up a standard of Separation?
A65870And that''t is next to taking away thy Estate?
A65870And then, where is that Church of Christ thou wouldst appeal unto, that is neither of thy party, nor of G. F''s?
A65870And was his Death then no ways conducing to our Salvation?
A65870And was not the said 15 l. an arbitrary punishment of thy own inflicting, both Illegal and Extrajudicial?
A65870And was that no Reason then to give others notice and warning against such a Spirit?
A65870And was the Apostle''s preaching the Gospel in a living Ministry only the words of mortal mam?
A65870And what are those Orders thou complainest of, and those Customs, Forms and Prescriptions?
A65870And what better doth his Reflection on the said People render them?
A65870And what follows on thy discovery and similitude?
A65870And what follows?
A65870And what hast thou got by the said Citation, thou hast so much insisted on?
A65870And what hast thou to charge all these with, that thou hast printed a Book and informed the Magistracy against them?
A65870And what if E. H. was a Clark for his yearly Salary, does that hinder his Credit in his signing our said Treatise on behalf of our Meeting?
A65870And what if the said Quarterly Meeting, would not once hear F. Bugg''s Letter, nor suffer it to be read?
A65870And what if the word[ as in it self] are not added, for the Tree of Knowledge being good for Food, as in it self, as thou hast plainly enough implyed?
A65870And what is W. R''s Judgment or Doctrine in that case?
A65870And what is our Language thou reflects upon?
A65870And what positive Proof hast thou, That the Manuscript of the Primmer, subscribed by G. F. and E. H. was sold for thirty Pound?
A65870And what such things are they thou insinuatest against the Pen- man and his Brethren?
A65870And what worse Marks and Characters of Infamy couldst thou have cast upon me?
A65870And what?
A65870And what?
A65870And wherein does he exceed all W. R''s Brethren, even them he has counted Honourable?
A65870And wherein is he condemnable of Excess in that case of his Habit or Dress?
A65870And wherein to take away thy Credit?
A65870And whether it be not contradictory to J. W. and J. S. their Testimony cited by himself?
A65870And who are to exercise and proceed in them, if not visible Persons?
A65870And why an Hue- and- Cry after his Name?
A65870And why didst not publish all our said Paper?
A65870And why so, but because they wrote in the Name of publick Meetings,& in the Name of the People call''d Quakers?
A65870And why so?
A65870Are no visible Persons instrumental therein by the Power of Christ?
A65870Are they not all he has written against in this Controversie, both named and unnamed?
A65870Are they not those whom he calls G. F. and his Party, G. F. and his Brethren?
A65870Are they so?
A65870Art not thou herein manifest to be the LYING DEFAMER, that hast so little regard to the Reputation or Credit of others?
A65870Art not thou now evading and shifting from our first Testimony, that was absolute against the payment of Tythes in these Gospel dayes?
A65870Burroughs was the Author of the same Paper aforesaid, which thou hast exposed in his name in Print?
A65870But art not thou a great Defamer and Opposer in thy said Charge of Notorious Blasphemy, and of being unworthy the Name of a Man,& c?
A65870But did God forbid the knowledge of himself, and of his Son, to Man in Innocency, when he forbad him to eat of the Tree of Knowledge?
A65870But does it hence follow, that these very things interposed by the Light, are esteemed void of Reason or Religion in themselves?
A65870But how Unjust is thy Comparison?
A65870But how comes he now to be Dear William Penn, Dear Friend, and This Noble man?
A65870But how did George Smith make thee Restitution?
A65870But how inconsistent with thy self art thou, as between shewing no sence, and thy Assertion in the same case?
A65870But how shamefully hast thou contradicted him in this matter, in thy disowning the arising of the Seed in Man?
A65870But is it indeed a Crime to call any dear Friends, who do commit an Error or Mistake?
A65870But must the Heathen and Fools be such absolute Judges in Church- Affairs, as over Apostates,& c?
A65870But the said Meeting would not hear his Letter: What great Crime was that?
A65870But then I would know, whether it is against all, or some, that G. F. has writ or given out?
A65870But then, what Company of Persecutors are those he now tells of, against whom he acts the part of a Defendant?
A65870But to thy Question; May not one Marry by the Priest, or pay Tythes, and yet be a Christian?
A65870But what if it please the Supream Power to bestow on the National Ministry Tythes?
A65870But what sayest thou to J. F''s Question, Why did thy Wife condemn it?
A65870But wherein lies his Charge of Prevarication?
A65870But why is W. R. so very ignorant of his Name, that he must needs make the noise of an Hue- and- Cry after it?
A65870But( Francis) art not thou thy self against Christian- Liberty of Conscience?
A65870But( William) hast thou been always of this mind?
A65870Can it either be a violence to their Principles of Union for such to meet together?
A65870Can that Soul dye with the Body, or end in Mortality?
A65870Can there be an Inconsistency where there''s no Contradiction, nor the least opposition?
A65870Could THAT be the Knowledge that God forbad Man eat of?
A65870Did God forbid the Knowledge of himself?
A65870Did not he proffer thee half the Fine to stop thy Turbulency?
A65870Did not the Primitive Apostles and Elders sometimes assemble, and that long before there were Popes or their Councils?
A65870Did they give thee Authority to write in their names and behalf, as those Other Friends in Truth thou tellest of and representest?
A65870Did they therefore seem to be in Union?
A65870Did we therein go about to bring corporal Punishment and Confiscation of Estate upon them?
A65870Didst not thou pretend to write on behalf of thy self, and other Friends in Truth concerned, as in the Title- page of thy great Book?
A65870Didst thou ever tell me of any thing thou hadst against me at Snare- Hill?
A65870Didst thou not here plainly enough shew thy sence, That the Tree of Knowledge was good for Food?
A65870Didst thou think to please those Brethren, and the Church of God in general, with a Rattle for Children?
A65870Does not this then by his own reflection, render him more like to a Papist than a strict Quaker?
A65870Does this prove them Infatuated, or unworthy the Name of Sober Conscientious Quakers?
A65870Dost thou know what Pensioner means?
A65870Doth this seem to have union with the Popes calling General Councils consisting of the Clergy?
A65870Ergo, thou dost Resemble the Pope, and seemest to be at Union with the Papistical party: Is not this( argumentum ad hominem) like thy Similitudes?
A65870For hath it not been frequent with us, to vindicate the People called Quakers?
A65870For if they do in no sense or degree represent Christ''s Government, how are they concern''d in it?
A65870For what means[ the aforesaid People] but the People called Quakers in general?
A65870Had not Eternal Salvation and Eternal Redemption a beginning, as to the Creature, yet Eternal?
A65870Hadst thou no better than the Pope''s Council of Jesuits and crafty Fryars to compare us unto, in our Testimony and Admonition?
A65870Hast not thou appeared like thy Brother John Pennyman, in thy empty and fruitless opposition?
A65870Hast not thou plainly objected against this Doctrine?
A65870Hast thou done as thou wouldst be done by?
A65870Hath it not been our practice from the beginning, to testifie against our Persecutors, and to reprove their Envy and Cruelty?
A65870How Irreligious wast thou then in it?
A65870How Uncharitable and Unjust?
A65870How are outward Methods, Forms, Order and Discipline then to be practised and proceeded in under Christ''s Government?
A65870How are we then reconciled by it?
A65870How art thou backsliden, and gone from that which first convinced thee of the way of the Lord and his holy Truth, which is but one?
A65870How blind and ignorant therefore is this Gain- sayer in his Opposition?
A65870How camest thou then so severely to censure and judge him and his Spirit, as Impious, Wicked,& c?
A65870How conceited and wise in thy own Eyes?
A65870How contrary to the Apostles Doctrine also is this?
A65870How couldst thou then lay Religion aside in this weighty concern?
A65870How didst thou resemble the Ranters therein, and bewray great and horrid Deceit to have entred thee?
A65870How evidently is he here self- condemned and judged?
A65870How hast thou acted the part of an ignorant conceited Scoffer, instead of proving thy Charge before cited?
A65870How hast thou lost true tenderness and the sence of Truth?
A65870How like a silly Sophister hast thou argued?
A65870How like an exalted, malicious, prating Diotrephes?
A65870How lofty and high art thou?
A65870How now Jeffery?
A65870How now Thomas?
A65870How now William?
A65870How now( Francis) is this thy treatment and comparison of us?
A65870How persecuting Informer- like( all circumstances considered) is thy Treatment?
A65870How prove you from Scripture, that those who freely pay it, do ill?
A65870How provest thou that?
A65870How then are outward Order, Methods, Forms and Discipline to be exercised and proceeded in under Christ''s Government?
A65870How then shall the Law go forth of Sion, and the Word from Jerusalem?
A65870How wilt thou clear thy self from a meer begging the Question in both?
A65870I do seriously ask William Rogers, if this Paper of ours, thus Recommended, be sufficient proof of Imposition, and being turned Antichristian?
A65870I pray thee produce thy Author and Informer for this Story, and what Friend of known Credit did so declare?
A65870If he says, not against all, but some; then I intreat him to let''s know, what SOME they are particularly?
A65870If thou canst not deny the Doctrine in it self, why hast thou made this an Instance of our seeming to be in union with the Popish party?
A65870Is Reconciliation no degree of Salvation?
A65870Is Schism no Sin, or not reproveable?
A65870Is it a violation to our first Principles of Union, to have Marriages proposed at least twice to the Meetings concerned?
A65870Is it hard to know?
A65870Is it in proposing Marriages twice( or at two sundry times) to the Meetings the parties b ● long to?
A65870Is it not here apparent, that we have informed the Reader, that''t is not right to esteem the Tree of Knowledge good for Food?
A65870Is it not more like exact Ranterism?
A65870Is it the plain Language of Thee and Thou to a single Person?
A65870Is not here general Opposition, both to such things and to such a Conformity?
A65870Is not here general Opposition,& c. detected and answered in our said Treatise, Accuser,& c?
A65870Is not such deceitful, injurious and contradictory Dealing rather contrary to common Morality and Civility amongst men?
A65870Is there not a plain difference between a certain Liberty in suffering Circumcision to the Jews, and terming it Christian- Liberty?
A65870Is there not as much need to keep unspotted of the Word in the great concern of Marriage, as in any other concern in this Life?
A65870Is this like the Testimony of the Christian- Quaker, as thou and thy Brother W. R. and his party would be rendred?
A65870Is this that Rome at home which Thou and F. B. would have Friends to Fly?
A65870Is this the very same Language approved by the Second day''s Meeting( as thou sayest?)
A65870Is this thy Christianity?
A65870Is this thy Conscience, thy Charity, thy Christianity, thy Love pretended?
A65870Is this thy best way to prove us guilty of aiming at Dominion and Lordship over Faith, Estates and Consciences?
A65870Is this thy proof of Antichristian Imposition, Apostacy and Innovation against us?
A65870Is this thy proof of thy charge?
A65870Is this thy proper Looking- Glass to see our Faces in?
A65870It seems thou art for Judgment against G. F. but who must be the Judges, and where the Judicature?
A65870May not they declare and practise outwardly what they have received from Christ inwardly?
A65870May we belong to one Shepherd, although not all in the Fold as yet?
A65870Mayest thou not blush and be ashamed of such silly Impertinent, yet abusive Scri ● ling, vain Shews, fallacious and abusive Similitudes?
A65870Must the Heathen be allowed a greater Power and Clearness in positive Judgment than the Church of Christ or Believers?
A65870Now let the Ingenious Reader observe, what great difference is there in thus representing him?
A65870Now let the serious and impartial judge; Is not here a manifest Dislike shown, and Judgment given?
A65870Now( Francis) where''s the Inconsistency charged?
A65870Of what?
A65870Or are they Helps and Governments, or helpers in Government without visible Persons?
A65870Or if no visible Persons be invested with power from Christ to execute outward Laws, Prescriptions, Order,& c?
A65870Or if thou didst not then look upon it as capable to answer the Witness of God in thy Conscience?
A65870Or that the Light of the Moon is Antichristian?
A65870Or to esteem thee and thy Abettors The Christian- Quaker, and all whom thou calumniatest to be Apostates and Innovators, according to thy Judgment?
A65870Or why hast pleaded a Liberty for a Believer''s refusing submission thereunto, on account of not seeing it his duty to submit?
A65870Query: How then dost thou affirm that such Souls are Mortal?
A65870S?
A65870See now, what amounts thy Similitude unto here?
A65870That all outward Works be things Indifferent,& c?
A65870That the Apostacy shall never enter the generality more?
A65870That there are Divisions,& c?
A65870That''s an Untruth by the way, and none of our words, but a scornful Pervertion: Where did we so account our selves?
A65870The Bishop''s saying, The Popes Light is come into the World, and men love Darkness better than Light?
A65870The Pope believes he is a true Christian, and no Apostate: So dost thou( W. R.) believe thou art a true Christian,& c. What follows?
A65870The Question is, Whether this Honour is not Eternal,( a parte post) that is, Everlasting to the Souls of the Righteous, whom God never forsakes?
A65870Then how can any such ever loose that Honour that God gives?
A65870This bespeaks little of any difference at all between the Pen- man and the Popish Clergy( ● nd why so?)
A65870This is unjust and untrue in the first place, and shews an imperious, Lordly, Exalted Spirit, thus to charge us with manifest Injustice: And why so?
A65870VVhat Liberty of Conscience dost thou allow them therein?
A65870W. R. dost thou allow of the said Paper thus recommended as a sufficient proof of the Subscribers Apostacy and Imposition?
A65870Was here nothing of the sense nor substance of their Testimony?
A65870Was it a Cry for thee to be heard against G. F. in his presence or absence?
A65870Was it not a Reflection upon the Church of Thyatira to suffer the woman Jezabel to teach and seduce,& c?
A65870Was not William Penn one of those sixty six Subscribers?
A65870We are sure then''t was not to smooth them up therein: And may not some aim at good( yea, the best) things, and yet be mistaken in some cases?
A65870Well, by whose Life?
A65870Were not the seven Churches of Asia commended in many things, when yet there were a few things against divers of them?
A65870Were not this to judge of Spirits without outward evidence or proof against them?
A65870Were not this very absurd, to render the Serpent more kind to Man than his Maker was?
A65870Were they therefore to be compared to the Popes and their General Councils?
A65870What Foundation or Certainty can we find in this mans writing?
A65870What Instructions, Rules or Methods they are he Condemns, and that he deems condemnable, as evil or unlawful in themselves?
A65870What Pension, Wages, or yearly Stipend dost thou charge me or us withal?
A65870What Self- contradiction and manifest Flattery art thou and thy Brother Bugg( like Parasites) guilty of?
A65870What a false Looking- Glass hast thou presented here?
A65870What a mean shift is it therefore for thee to say, Thy end was not ONLY for Money?
A65870What amounts all thy work of Opposition and Gain- saying unto?
A65870What an arbitrary Persecutor wast thou therein?
A65870What an unconscionable Defamer art thou?
A65870What an unjust and false Representative hast thou shewn thy self, by thy own rule and manner of Reflection upon others?
A65870What capacity could such be in to answer the Witness of God in thy Conscience, if apostatiz''d from it in themselves?
A65870What contrariety thereto have they?
A65870What defidence and unbelief hath entred thee?
A65870What empty Flourishes does this Person dress himself in?
A65870What expression a Proper Looking- Glass?
A65870What follows according to thy Similitude?
A65870What follows?
A65870What hast THOU then done against us; yea, against many of the peaceable People called Quakers?
A65870What hast thou done less than wrote against outward Orders, Forms, Discipline,& c?
A65870What kind of Preacher would he make, if he should tell People, The Tree of Knowledge is good for Food; the Tree of Knowledge is not good for Food?
A65870What new and unchristian Doctrines and Practices are we fallen into?
A65870What proof is all this against the Pen- man, but to expose thy Malice and dubious( as well as proofless) Reflections to open censure?
A65870What reason had Friends to interrupt their publick and weighty concerns of Truth with the then reading of an Adversary''s letter?
A65870What sayest thou to it?
A65870What sayst thou yet William to these plain Instances out of thy own great Book?
A65870What smoothing was this, when we had plainly shewed them their Mistake?
A65870What then means his exclaiming so much against our Meetings about Church Affairs, as being an uncertain number of uncertain qualified Persons?
A65870What things are those?
A65870What''s all his Noise come to on this account?
A65870What''s more plain against him than his own words before recited?
A65870What''s more plain than Affirmative in the one, and Negative in the other, on the same subject?
A65870What''s the matter with him on which he is so furious?
A65870When the Apostle said, Hitherto I have fed you with Milk, and not with strong Meat; Was this a Soul''s feeding or nourishing, yea or nay?
A65870Where did we ever assume a Government in Christ''s stead over the Conscience?
A65870Where is now the LYING LAWYER?
A65870Where is then their Neutrallity?
A65870Where now hath W. R. shown the Pen- man guilty of great Impudence, in writing in behalf of the peaceable People called Quakers?
A65870Where then is his Comparison between Pope Leo the tenth, and us?
A65870Where''s now the Contradiction?
A65870Where''s now the seeming Contradiction in this to the precedent Passage?
A65870Where''s then his exception against our vindication and writing in the Plural, in the Name of the peaceable People called Quakers?
A65870Where''s then our seeming Union?
A65870Where''s thy Christianity, Conscience, Religion and Order pretended?
A65870Where''s thy Conscience, or doing as thou wouldst be done by?
A65870Whereof thou knowest William Penn was one: How foully hast thou asperst and represented C. M. and W. P.& c. in these things?
A65870Whether EVERY CASE be to be limited only to WORLDLY MATTERS, and not extend to any Cases of a Spiritual nature?
A65870Whether thou lookest upon the said Meeting now in a capacity to answer the Witness of God in thy Conscience?
A65870Who then are opposers of J. W. and J. S. that are not of party with G. F.( in W. R''s account) and consequently no Persecutors?
A65870Who will believe thee, thinkest thou, that are not of thy own Party?
A65870Whom dost thou herein accuse?
A65870Why didst thou leave these Words out of thy Citation?
A65870Why dost thou then separate thy self from others, that is, from the Church of England?
A65870Why no Relation to them?
A65870Why separatest thou from the National Worship, and makest thy self a Preacher at the Quakers Meetings in Sudbury?
A65870[ Did he here term Circumcision Christian- Liberty?
A65870and his Brethrens Paper of Separation in Westmerland, quoted by him, plainly limiting to Chosen men, Chosen, Imployed and Authorized by the Churches?
A65870and now to use the words Vs, We or Our, with respect to such as encouraged the giving forth thereof, as in thy Advertisement to thy seventh part?
A65870and the end of thy feigned Lamentation and Praying for us, thus to abuse us, and cast dirt upon us, after this general implicit and suspicious manner?
A65870and what more severe Excommunication or Bull couldst thou have exhibited in Print against me?
A65870and yet none more ready to make a great clamour against Excommunications, Orders, Edicts,& c. than thy self?
A65870as between his saying, The persecuting Opposers of J. S. and J. W. and saying, That they are persecuting Opposers who oppose them?
A65870how can you escape the Condemnation of the Just and Righteous One; who have set up Shadows instead of Substance, and Form instead of Power?
A65870how couldst thou exclude that weighty concern of Marriage out of Religion?
A65870how durst thou either write in the name or behalf of so many, whom thou countest Friends in Truth, and numerous too?
A65870how like a Pope?
A65870how like the Accuser of the Brethren hast thou acted?
A65870is it in having no concern of Conscience outwarly to appear on either party, as W. R. saith?
A65870is this a fit Comparison and Instance to present the Magistrates with, against our Christian, Religious, Charitable and Sober Womens Meetings?
A65870must he therefore be a Persecutor of his Brethren, and yet a Dear Friend, Dear William Penn, This Noble man,& c. in thy Book?
A65870not as given to any use whatsoever?
A65870or have their Assemblies no relation to Scripture?
A65870or that''t is not lawful for them, to receive it from such?
A65870or was it Justice for thee to be heard read the Papers or Indictments against him, when he was many Miles distant?
A65870seeing we are reconciled by his Death; who dyed and rose again, and Death has no more dominion over him?
A65870that Knowledge which is the Way to Life, to man in the state of Innocency in the beginning?
A65870the Knowledge which is Life eternal?
A65870the said printed Epistle of two Sheets, though the greatest part of thy great Book was printed before that was writ?
A65870was not this particular matter of Fact, and that very gross and absurd?
A65870what because we have not every particular circumstance of Persons and things exprest?
A65870what variation of his sence?
A65870when they disown thee, thy Preaching and Corrupt, Erronious and Antiscriptural Doctrine?
A65870where''s thy Conscience, in writing not only thus insignificantly, but thus evasively and prevaricatingly?
A65870words for fruits) But how can it be cript, when the page is quoted, where''t is to be found at large?
A65870— Why might not the Practice of such a Christian, be without offence termed Christian- Liberty?
A65863& c. And whether, or to whom was the Spirit sent from Eternity?
A65863& c. Come, what part of Scripture is your Rule?
A65863( as his words are) And when was that performed or wrought?
A65863( as manifest in you) Is not Christ Justification, and Sanctification?
A65863( however was it not an Act in time) if so, how sayes T. V. That the Generation of the Son must be Eternal?
A65863* Where then is his absolute Power and soveraignity so much profest?
A65863* Where then is the Impossibility in him for it?
A6586319?
A6586325. what Scripture hath he for this, or these Expressions?
A658633. how are they three distinct or separate persons, subsisting each by himself?
A6586349. to a righteousness bestowed upon men by Faith; I ask, if that man is not a partaker and enjoyer of that righteousness by Faith?
A65863Again, How oft did they provoke him, and grieve him in the Desart?
A65863Alas, alas, what a cruel unjust and unequal Master would this render God?
A65863And Abraham''s Faith, who obeyed God, and forsook his Countrey?
A65863And also, Is it not clear that you deny the true Faith of God''s Elect, that the Just lives by?
A65863And are not you them that shoot at the perfect with your dirty Arrows?
A65863And did Christ make Satisfaction for the sins of men, that they should live and die in their sins?
A65863And did not Paul absolutely forbid such Philosophy and vain deceipt?
A65863And do you not say, That Faith is not perfect?
A65863And do you not say, That your Sanctification, and Justification, and your Prayers, and Graces, and Faith, all are imperfect?
A65863And do you think that the Lord will nor remember and reckon with you for all these things?
A65863And does not this their Doctrine lead People to trample the Blood of the New Covenant under foot, and this is to deny the one Offering?
A65863And dost thou not, in thy 16th page of thy Synopsis, bring the Greek Philosophers to prove the Persons?
A65863And doth not Faith heal?
A65863And have you not taken Tythes of them?
A65863And have you the same Power and Spirit as they had that gave forth Scriptures?
A65863And he speaks again in his 14th page of Three distinct Persons are one with the God- head; — Now Reader, is not here Four?
A65863And how Friends were thronged in Prison up and down in the Nation by you?
A65863And how then are such as be in Christ new Creatures?
A65863And if such a plenary Satisfaction( as it is called) be made for some in that sinful state, why not for all?
A65863And if there were three Coeternal Persons before, whether this doth not make a fourth?
A65863And in the Beginning was the Word, and all things were made by the Word: and, were all things made by the Scriptures?
A65863And is it not a shame to put in Print, to tell the World, That thou wouldst rather have thy People go to a Bawdy- house, than to a Quakers Meeting?
A65863And is it not perfect?
A65863And is not Faith the Gift of God?
A65863And must you not Pray in the Spirit of God?
A65863And so was not his Suffering two- fold, both Inward and Outward?
A65863And then I Query, How is this Satisfaction made by Christ?
A65863And there, in your Directory, do you not set up your Imaginations and Meanings above Scriptures?
A65863And they say, That he will not have mercy upon all; and do not you say, That he will have mercy upon some?
A65863And was Christ''s manner of being in the Flesh of an infinite nature?
A65863And was not the Church Established in the Faith?
A65863And was the Father''s begetting the Son a Personal Act?
A65863And was there any Act but what was brought forth in time?
A65863And what sense is it to say, thy Makers[ is] thy Husband?
A65863And what was that Rule that Adam had, and all the Holy Men in the Old World?
A65863And what was the Light that shined in the Darkness, and the Darkness comprehended it not?
A65863And what was the Rule of Enoch''s Faith, by which he was translated?
A65863And where do the Scripture say, That they may seek for Christ''s Righteousness Imputed without themselves?
A65863And where doth T. D. prove his Doctrine of Christ''s being holy by a true inherent righteousness of the humane Nature?
A65863And where doth the Scripture mention three increated Persons thou tell''st of, are they three distinct increated Persons?
A65863And where doth the Scripture say, That a man shall not be made free from sin?
A65863And where doth the Scripture say, The Works of Faith, and the Works of Grace, and the Fruits of the Spirit, are sinful?
A65863And where doth the Scripture use these words Accidents and Integrals of the God- head?
A65863And where is his Soul called Humane?
A65863And whether it doth not render God, or represent the Deity, to be like visible men, or finite creatures, that are comprehended in time, yea or nay?
A65863And why do you Presbyterians cry against the Quakers Light, which is Christ, as being but an Heathenish light?
A65863And would they not lay the fault in God, when the fault is in man by not believing?
A65863And would you not say, The Peace of God to them, for paying you Tythe?
A65863And, do not you Contradict Scripture, and God, and Christ, and the Prophets and Apostles words, and so are found in an Erronicus Principled Spirit?
A65863And, is not he in you?
A65863And, why do you deny Common Prayer, and set up a Directory and a Church Faith of your own making?
A65863Are Heaven and Earth Persons?
A65863Are not all things that bear record Witnesses?
A65863Are they now chang''d from infinite to finite?
A65863But can it be said of the Immortal God, whom they distinguish into three several Persons, that he ever dyes?
A65863But did God undergo that punishment?
A65863But his saying, You must kill or be killed, either you must overcome the world, or the world you: What must they kill but sin and worldly lusts?
A65863But how doth this hold with that before, That it was but an Inclination to punish?
A65863But is there not perfect obedience now for men to perform?
A65863But then, when is this freedom from Sin, or state of Holiness( which T. D. saith will be in a proper sence perfect) attainable, if not in this life?
A65863But was Christ, being cloathed with Flesh, or the Spirits appearing in the shape of a Dove, or being sent, from Eternity?
A65863But what doth all your performances amount to, while Perfection is denied, and Sin contended so much for by you?
A65863But, what is all the Scripture the Rule, from Genesis to the Revelations, to walk by and practice?
A65863But, who art thou, O man, that doth find fault with thy Maker?
A65863Can he not satisfie or please himself?
A65863Could Christ''s Death, or Temporal Sufferings be Eternal?
A65863Could they be Justified without a Saving Knowledge?
A65863Danson, and William Maddox to it?
A65863Did you ever hear such a Mash?
A65863Distinguish: For you say the Scripture is your Rule?
A65863Do not daub up People with untempered Mortar; do you know the Mortar that is tempered?
A65863Do not you hold Justification without, and that it is without Man and Woman?
A65863Do ye know what you are doing?
A65863Do you know what you are?
A65863Do you know where you are?
A65863Do you know whether you are a going?
A65863Do you not belye the Rule here?
A65863Do you not give the Scripture the lye?
A65863Does it depend upon him as Man, or as God and Man?
A65863Dost thou not abuse the Father, Son, and Spirit, and Scriptures?
A65863Dost thou not bring Cardinal Pool, and Aquinas, and Aristotle, to prove thy Assertions, and thy Imaginations?
A65863Doth he then bid them look, bid them walk aright in the strait Path?
A65863Doth it not give Victory?
A65863Doth not this still relate to the outward or visible appearance of man?
A65863First, Hereupon I do enquire, if man that hath been in Prison and bondage under sin and corruption be let out of that Prison upon Christ''s Obedience?
A65863For if he have alwayes enemies or sins unsubdued in this Life, how are they overcome and victory obtained?
A65863For was not Adam and Eve the first Parents of both, to whom this Promise was made?
A65863For, doth not the Scripture say, That Christ is the Word?
A65863Had he another manner of being distinct from his own?
A65863Hadst thou not this word from the Heathen?
A65863Hath not Faith works that purifies the heart?
A65863Have you not been like Judas, and the Persecuting Jewes, and the Heathen, that Persecuted the true Christians?
A65863Hear ye now ye House of David, is it a small thing to weary men, but will ye weary my God also?
A65863How now Professors, Do you thus requite God for his Love?
A65863How then did Christ undergo infinite Wrath from offended infinite Justice, that sinners and sin deserved, when he never sinned?
A65863How then is God free in his Attributes, as they confess?
A65863How then was he the Son of his Love, who freely gave himself to bear the sins, sorrow, and burthen of all?
A65863How would they be acquitted before him?
A65863I ask how this consists with your sence of Vindictive Justice else where?
A65863I ask if refusable Payment, how then is God bound to take Vengeance, in T. V. his sense?
A65863I ask what Law it is an act of?
A65863I ask, if the effects of that Blood are not known within, in its purging the Conscience, and cleansing from all sin,& c?
A65863I must confess I never heard this Argument before; if each Holy signifie a Person, how then are they spoken to the One God?
A65863If another thing be paid, How agrees this with J. O?
A65863If it consist in his Personal Obedience and Suffering onely, without the knowledge of his work within?
A65863If there be Three in the God- head he hath made Four; for, what is the God- head?
A65863If this Mystery be so apparent in Scripture, why can they neither demonstrate it, nor clear it to themselves?
A65863If yes ▪ where, or in what place of the whole world( or out of it) is the one entire and severed from the other?
A65863Is God a Man?
A65863Is God divided, or Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, separate or abstract from their Essences?
A65863Is God fully satisfied that any should live in sin, or is his infinite Justice satisfied so, as not to lay hold on them in the sinful state?
A65863Is Paper and Ink in Peoples hearts?
A65863Is he ever divided or displeased with himself?
A65863Is it all a Rule for practice?
A65863Is it for men to live Soberly, Righteously, Godly, in this World?
A65863Is it himself?
A65863Is it in God, yea or nay; or relating to his Divine Being, or Substance?
A65863Is it not called the Righteousness of Faith?
A65863Is it not sad Doctrine that supposeth any Separation, Finiteness, or Limitation, in this Divine Being?
A65863Is it to maintain a Universal Kindness and Good Will to men?
A65863Is it?
A65863Is not Christ and his Body Glorified, and he the Lord from Heaven; for is not Christ''s Nature Divine, and his Soul Divine, which comes out from God?
A65863Is not Christ''s Prayer to be fulfilled, or did he pray in vain?
A65863Is not Christ''s Prayers available?
A65863Is not here a manifest contradiction between these two Brethren unto themselves, and their own Doctrine in this matter?
A65863Is not humane Finite, according to T. D. and T. V. their Doctrine?
A65863Is not this a confirmation to what is queried before concerning this he calls Vindictive Justice?
A65863Is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, Finite?
A65863Is there any Love in God that is not well pleasing unto himself?
A65863Is there finiteness in each person, and yet each person God; what gross darkness and blasphemy is this?
A65863Is this such a childish, shameful, or brainless Consequence, that the Debt remains still to Christ?
A65863Judge what would be the effect hereof?
A65863Let us see Scripture for these things, and that the Apostles practised them as you do; and whether your practises were according to theirs?
A65863Let us see where ever Christ, or the Prophets, or Apostles, preached such Doctrine?
A65863Must not Christ be in you?
A65863Must we obey every tittle of it?
A65863Nay, did they not Preach in the simplicity of the Gospel, and Exhort in simplicity, as of the Abilitiy that God gave?
A65863No, he is a Spirit, I tell thee the Scripture sayes so: Is the Holy Ghost a Man?
A65863Now T. V. his Doctrine and meaning speakes as much, as that he that is born of God doth commit sin,( shall we believe John or him?)
A65863Now do you not cry up Bawdy- houses, or any way, so that you can get gain?
A65863Of that which is plainly derogatory to the Glory of the Infinite God, by going to fasten the limitations of finite Creatures upon him?
A65863Or dare they say, That the Father, Word, and Spirit, are three distinct, severed, or separate Creators, and doth not this bespeak three Gods?
A65863Or how are they three distinct increated persons of an infinite nature, as before?
A65863Or if this Love of Complacency( so termed) was the Effect of Christs Satisfaction, and not the other, then was it not in Being in God before?
A65863Or might not( probably) Justin bring in some of his Philosophy, which is not Scripture?
A65863Or was he therein a Fourth Person?
A65863Or were it good Doctrine to say, that God so loved the World, that he hated his only Son?
A65863Or, how have they that are his, crucified the flesh with the Affections and Lusts?
A65863Or, is there a Victory over Enemies, and they not overcome?
A65863Or, three distinct separate persons of an infinite nature?
A65863Or, what part of Scripture is the Rule?
A65863Reader, Do but mark his Jigg here, and what a whirling he has made like one distempered; but where is his Scripture for all this?
A65863Reply, Is not a person that is in himself impure opposite to God''s pure Nature?
A65863Reply, What time was that the Gentiles had no Promise of Christ and how long was it?
A65863Samuel Fisher''s Book against me, instead of writing against a new man?
A65863Secondly, And if we be only so far made righteous by Christs Obedience, as unrighteous by our own disobedience: how far is that?
A65863Secondly, whether a man being a Person is a competent instance for proof of his Maker being three several Persons?
A65863Seeing the Law of Faith is acknowledged, I ask, how far it extends, whether to enjoyn to the perfect obedience of Faith, yea or nay?
A65863So see whether you are not adders to these Words, as it is made appear before?
A65863T. V. Whether is it any absurdity, to say, that God should be at the Charges of his own Satisfaction?
A65863Tell us what it is by Chapter and Verse; thou sayes the Scripture is the Rule?
A65863That I refer all modest and sober Readers to judge of, Whether T. V. hath spoken Truth herein, yea or nay?
A65863The Scriptures speaks plentifully concerning Christ being the Word of God: God is the Word, is not this Scripture?
A65863Then your indeavouring and striving is all in the unbelief, How do you indeavour and strive?
A65863Thirdly, whether Christ be several and distinct by himself from God ▪ and the holy Spirit several and distinct from both?
A65863This is a dark thing, to whom will you liken me, saith God?
A65863Thou sayest the Soul is part of man''s Nature; Where doth the Scripture, thy Rule, say so?
A65863Thou sayest the word Person can not properly be attributed to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost: Why doth the Presbyterians rage so against the Quakers?
A65863Thou speaks of Three Persons; and a man is a Person; What doest thou infer from this?
A65863Three Subsistents, Three Persons, and Analogically; Is this a Scripture word People?
A65863To which T. D. answereth; Why not?
A65863Upon which, I query, is the distinction of three Persons derived from three Makers, or three Creators?
A65863WHether do the Scriptures speak of Three Persons in the God- head, according to your own Rule, in these express words; let us see where it is written?
A65863Walking humbly with God, were opposed to the Faith it self, which is the Root thereof?
A65863Was Christ the Image of the Father, as he was of the Generation of Abraham, or David, or Adam?
A65863Was there ever such darkness and confusion uttered?
A65863Well, Mark Reader, he sayes there are Three Persons, and Three Subsistents in the God- head; and hath not he made Four here?
A65863Were they not Spiritual Acts of the Divine Spirit and Power of God?
A65863What Evil was it that sinners deserved or should have undergone?
A65863What Liberty here, do you give to Youth, and your Hearers?
A65863What Scripture hath he for these words and this Doctrine?
A65863What Scripture hath he then to call it humane?
A65863What a strange Object is he here rendred?
A65863What a strange limitation is here laid upon the infinite God?
A65863What agreement is this which is not simply?
A65863What course then will he take to convince such?
A65863What darkness is here?
A65863What differs now between substance and subsistence?
A65863What false glosses would he set upon his Contradictions?
A65863What gross and apparent Contradictions are these?
A65863What gross darkness is this?
A65863What is it then?
A65863What is that Image in his People he loves freely, is it perfect or imperfect?
A65863What is that Light that shines in the Heart, to give the Knowledge of the Glory of God in the face of Christ Jesus?
A65863What is the Word of God in the Heart the Apostle Preached, and the People was to obey it, and do it?
A65863What less do their own distinctions and comparisons concerning them amount to, than to Three Apostles, or men?
A65863What strange Logick is implyed here?
A65863What then are persons in a Justified state while they are neither meet for Heaven, not fit to enjoy it?
A65863What then can be God''s end in lightning them?
A65863What think you, his Hearers, and the rest of his Brethren, Were these words savoury, and did they become his Profession, yea or nay?
A65863What was the Spirit that the Wicked grieved, vexed, and quenched?
A65863What, is this your Doctrine that you now Preach up, for your Hearers, to go to a Bawdy- house, as Thomas Vincent speaks?
A65863What, this is a new way?
A65863Where are the Blasphemers now?
A65863Where did the Apostles use any such dark words?
A65863Where do the Scripture speak of a Trinity of distinct Persons, from Genesis to the Revelation?
A65863Where does the Scripture say so?
A65863Where doth the Scripture say, That it self is the Word of God?
A65863Where doth the Scripture say, That the Father, Son, and Spirit doth not agree simply?
A65863Where doth the Scripture say, from Genesis to the Revelation, That the true Faith of God is without Works?
A65863Where doth the Scripture speak of an Humane Nature of Christ in Heaven?
A65863Where doth the Scriptures use these Expressions, or this distinction of an Electing Love, and Complacing Love in God?
A65863Where is it that leads the Saints into all Truth?
A65863Where is it?
A65863Where is now the blasphemy, and blasphemer?
A65863Where proves he this by Scripture?
A65863Where proves he this in all the Scriptures?]
A65863Where then is the newness of Life altogether, or the Grace of God in its teaching to deny those things, obeyed?
A65863Where were you in the time of Persecution?
A65863Whether brings in more profit to the Priests mouths, Tythes, and Easter- Reckonings, and Midsummer- Dues, or the Great Platter?
A65863Whether or no all the sinners and ungodly of the whole World are Justified by his Death, and by his offering up once for all?
A65863Whether or no was Christ an Offering for the sins of the whole World, and died for the sins of the whole World?
A65863Which to accuse all God''s People of worldly Lusts all their life time, what an abuse is it to them?
A65863Who can not see the ignorance and confusion of thy blind distinction?
A65863Why is not that Scripture produced all this while, if there be such, as reveal your distinctions and notion of persons in God?
A65863Will you deny his Prayer you vain men?
A65863Will you deny the Works of Faith, because the Works of the Law was denyed by the Apostle?
A65863Yes, very well it may be so said, Christ gave them power to become the Sons of God, who believed on his Name; and was not this God''s Power?
A65863You that deny Perfection, do ye not deny the One Offering, Christ Jesus, who hath perfected for ever them that are Sanctified?
A65863[ But then doth T. D. think he amends it, by considering God as a Creditor, and so as a private Person?
A65863a compensation made to God for our sin by Christ doing or suffering, or both, Justice that is Vindictive?
A65863a sutable disposition to the Law, as his words are?
A65863and Faith in you?
A65863and are the Water and the Blood Persons, seeing they bear record in the Earth?
A65863and by the same reason, when he and they are found guilty of Cavils and Sophisms, may not others as much slight him and them therein?
A65863and doth not this also accord with T. V. his Doctrine?
A65863and doth not this extend to all that were dead?
A65863and doth the Satisfaction consist in humane Blood?
A65863and how far distant one from another?
A65863and how must sacred mysteries be known?
A65863and how the Presbyterians and Priests beat the Quakers?
A65863and how then did the Apostle bring them as a Proof of Justification?
A65863and if all their Debts be paid, why are they not out of Prison?
A65863and is Conscience in a man a Person distinct from the man, seeing Conscience beareth witness?
A65863and is this the use you make of your Plea for a full Satisfaction and Debt paid for you?
A65863and that it is not attainable in this Life?
A65863and the Spirit of God in you to Pray by?
A65863and was it not Everlasting?
A65863and what Answer would he make them to this their corruption?
A65863and what blind Sophistry, and silly Logick and babling do these men use, and put upon the Immortal God?
A65863and what is it in him that can answer to, and receive the Spiritual Testimony of Truth and Salvation?
A65863and what is the Spirit of Truth that reproves the World of sin?
A65863and what meaning will they give to it?
A65863and where doth the Scripture speak of any Person without either Soul or Body?
A65863and where ever did the Apostles, and true Ministers of God Preach in this manner, or allow of such Philosophy in Preaching the Mysteries of God?
A65863and where then is this finite personallity so much contended for?
A65863and wherein doth man bear a proportion or likeness in his Person with his Maker?
A65863and whether a man subsists by himself?
A65863and yet he was both God and( innocent) Man?
A65863are these pertinent proofs of their distinct personalities, which are reckoned Co- eternal?
A65863as well as 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A65863but is not that which is humane Finite?
A65863by Godliness; and if Godliness be enjoyned upon all, I ask, must all remain in a sinful ungodly state?
A65863do you not confess it was the Wrath and Vengeance of God, Hell, Everlasting Damnation, and Punishment from his just hand?
A65863do you thus requite the Lord, and answer his requirings, will he accept of these things at your hands?
A65863for that was the end of Christian Religion,& c. Is it to do as we would be done by?
A65863for their being three distinct persons, subsistences, or manners of being; For, were they three distinct Comforters of an infinite nature?
A65863for was not he the brightness of his Fathers Glory, and the express Image of his Divine Substance?
A65863from personal Acts, as he calls them, as sending the Comforter, his speaking and guiding,& c. Where doth the Scripture call them Personal Acts?
A65863from whence did his acts or works of real obedience proceed and flow, if not from his living Faith, and its righteousness within?
A65863had Christ any thing but what was Gods?
A65863have we not been actually unrighteous, and shall we so far be made righteous by Christ''s Righteousness?
A65863herein shewed his Ignorance of Scripture?
A65863how do Professors resent this Doctrine?
A65863how then doth it satisfie Infinite Justice?
A65863how was it unsutable to the Law?
A65863how will this hold consistent?
A65863if they say it is; where do the Scriptures say so?
A65863in this his outrage, be a Person to be believed, yea, or nay?
A65863is it real or true, or no?
A65863is not here manifest contradiction?
A65863lay such an Impossibility on God of freely pardoning?
A65863must they all live in Sin and Imperfection tearm of life, and say all our Debts is paid?
A65863nor yet partakers of that which makes like to God, and brings into Communion with him?
A65863or according to the Spirit?
A65863or how could that do those things contained in the Law without a sutable disposition to it?
A65863or that is not of his Good Will, or Benevolence, which is confest to be saving?
A65863or why should they say, we desire not the knowledge of thy Wayes, if the knowledge thereof was not tendred to them?
A65863or would not the Scripture satisfie them, and yet profess it their Rule?
A65863queries how can the Power of God, or a quality be said to be sent, to be given, to be bestowed on men?
A65863saith) if they must not really injoy Christ''s Righteousness within?
A65863saith, That the Lord extendeth his special Mercies to?
A65863surely nay: Or, did Christ as man, undergo that eternal Punishment, Death, and Curse due to sinners?
A65863that Imputation is an Act of Law and makes a Relative, and not a real change?
A65863then are not all men so free and acquitted for whom he did suffer?
A65863throughout?
A65863was it Spiritual yea or nay?
A65863was not his Righteousness from the Divine Nature?
A65863what Gods are they that these men would have us believe in?
A65863what do you signifie for him?
A65863what doth it signifie to them, if they be so wholy uncapable of seeing ever the better?
A65863what nature was it by which they did those things contained in it?
A65863where are their Souls?
A65863where are their sins and pollutions and imperfections, if all be yet uncleansed and not freed from sin?
A65863where doth he prove these words in Scripture?
A65863where doth the Scripture say that his Soul was created?
A65863where it is said, Thy Maker is thine Husband, the Lord of Hosts is his Name; Is not this truly rendered?
A65863where then was his Faith, and the righteousness and obedience of it, if in reallity he was not a partaker and an enjoyer thereof within?
A65863why doth he actum agere, as he saith?
A65863with Blasphemy, who never denied the infiniteness of either Father, Word, or Spirit; but what greater Blasphemy can there be than their own?
A65863— And so, in the Title of his Book, he speaks of Three Persons in the God- head; Are there not Four then?
A65863— And so, is it not clear, That you deny the Blood of Christ, and trample it under your feet?
A65863— And we say the Scriptures are a better Rule than your Directory; for if the Scriptures be the Rule, why do you set up a Directory to be your Rule?
A65863— And what Hee, is this, but Christ Jesus?
A65863— Come, are these words spoken in the Rule, the Scriptures?
A65863— Come, what is this agreement then, if it be not an agreeing simply?
A65863— Didst thou not say, That God was so simple, that he admitted of no parts; what agreement is this if it be not simple?
A65863— Do you not make the Blood of Christ of none effect here?
A65863— For the outward Jewes in the Figure, had Blood sprinkled upon them in the outward Offerings; — Come answer us by Scripture?
A65863— Is not the Great Bason holden at Door?
A65863— Should you not call the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as the Holy Men did call them in the Scriptures?
A65863— So how can you say they are separated, when they are one in another?
A65863— So is it not clear here whose Ministers you are?
A65863— What think you, do we not know your tricks?
A65863— — Now, do you not say there is no Perfection?
A65863‖ Are not all that are in Sin and Bondage of Corruption in Prison?
A54120( as their Phrase is) and have not divers of thy Brethren deem''d it Anti- christian?
A54120( what say you Professors to it?)
A54120* And who must drag the Devils to Judgment then, if they must be so officious for Justice?
A54120* And who must make so vile and like Devils?
A54120* How long before their Conformity to Christ were they appointed?
A54120* Is it so?
A54120* Not?
A54120* Was he so?
A54120* What sad Work''s here?
A54120* What will become of the Covetous Priests and Presbyters then?
A54120* their Hands and Feet fry?
A5412012, 13, 14. to the End: Are not here plain Causes sh ● … wn why God hated Esau?
A5412012. for what needed that if they be all fo strictly paid in their Stead?
A5412015, 16. to be got out of the Bible?
A5412016 — To whom will ye liken God?
A5412018 — What House will ye build me?
A5412019, 20. was this but the Light of the Moon?
A541201st, The Law never allows us to sin, no more doth Grace, or the Gospel; Shall we sin, because we are no more under the Law, but under Grace?
A541201st, Was not this in Man while in Innocency in the Image of God; though he then not Immoveably Confirmed in it, however accepted while he stood in it?
A5412020. and so what know you but that the Lord hath made some of his Servants Signs and Wonders against many in Spiritual Aegypt and Bondage?
A5412021. Who gave Jacob to the Spoil, and Israel to the Robbers?
A5412025. how then should this Querist be capable to contain them?
A5412026. and then are not his Works in us, ● … ding to our Justification and Acceptance, being recko ● … d ours, as wrought in us?
A5412028. did not accordingly come to experience his Appearance unto their Salvation?
A541202dly, If you say he Was, I query, whether that same Christ be in the Heart of every Man and Woman?
A5412033. and if you say, he is meer God; doth it not then clearly follow you deny the man Christ?
A5412035. which is, Did not Jesus say, There is yet a little Light IN YOU?
A541203dly, Are not the blessed Angels accepted in their Obedience to God, which from a Sence of his divine power they are exercised in?
A541203dly, But, from the Beginning of Life to the End, who can say, he hath perfect Righteousness inherent in him?
A541203dly, Whether he that you own to be the Christ, and true Saviour was put to death, or Crucified on the Cross?
A541204. divine in it self?
A541204thy, Whether you believe there is any other Christ then what is in the heart of man, yea or nay?
A541205thly,[ A poor Worm, Weakling and nothing Creature] What is this to shew thy Humility and self- Abasement?
A541206 — God is Light; and upon whom hath not his Light arisen?
A541206. by way of Paraphrase that Prophetick Saying; Whom have ye likened me unto, saith the Lord?
A541207. and that killed, and in other places that there was no Justification by it?
A541207?
A541207thly, I query, whether you own any other Resurrection then what( you say) you experience within?
A541209. Who are the Subjects of everlasting Wrath and Vengeance?
A541209. and why will ye die, O house of Israel?
A54120?
A54120A frivolous Exception; Can there be such divine Shi ● … ing without his divine Light?
A54120A gross Inference; are those things higher then God?
A54120A manifest Contradiction; can it discover the greater, and not the lesser?
A54120Abraham saw Christ''s Day; What Day?
A54120Again, We witness it; Poor Creature, Thou runst to the Letter, what dost thou witness in thy self?
A54120Alas ● … VVhy do you hang about me with Tears and VVeeping?
A54120And Flesh and Blood can not inherit the Kingdom of God?
A54120And He that obeyed and suffered for us( who wrought Righteousness) Greater then the Act of Obedience?
A54120And as to our being asked, what this Mortal is that must put on Immortality?
A54120And can this be applyed to nothing, nor any other wise, then to that very Flesh or gross Body, that returns to Dust?
A54120And can we be justified without pleasing God, or please God without Justification?
A54120And did not Peter bear witness to the Light shining in a dark Place?
A54120And did not Peter preach him and his Name to whom all the Prophets gave Witness?
A54120And did not all the true Ministers preach Christ as God''s Covenant, given for a Light and Salvation to the Ends of the Earth?
A54120And doth not this bring us to receive the Attonement, and to enjoy Peace?
A54120And doth not this directly lead into Ranterism, and finally into Atheism?
A54120And doth not this extend to the same holy and spiritual Ends which the Scriptures direct to?
A54120And doth not to Rise again, imply, that Man was fallen before?
A54120And for what end is his Light in every man given, if not to direct unto Salvation?
A54120And for what end is it given universally to Man- kind?
A54120And hast not thou confest, that Christ, AS the Eternal Word enlightens every Man?
A54120And hath not this Son of Perdition or Mystery of Iniquity been exalted in Apostates above all that''s called God?
A54120And have we not the more Reason to deny your Practice, if it be not in the same manner as pretended here?
A54120And he that abid ● … th in Christ sinneth not; and is not the Branch of the Nature of the Vine?
A54120And how Contrary to the Testimonies of his Faithful Witnesses hath this Man rendered God?
A54120And how do you urge men to Observe it?
A54120And how is God especially known to be the Saviour, but in saing man from Sin, Unrighteousness and all Guile?
A54120And if God''s Soveraignity over man, and man''s Subjection thereto be known, doth not this extend to Perfection?
A54120And if it be the Work of the Spirit to sanctifie and renew us; is not this a saving Work?
A54120And if the Father, the Word and the holy Spirit be God, can not God be the Saviour?
A54120And if they speak, what Language of Hell will there issue forth of their Lips?
A54120And if this Holy Spirit be not communicable?
A54120And if you were Naturally Blind, had not I Eye- salve?
A54120And in what Country or People does not his Spirit come, if an Infinite Spirit?
A54120And is not Christ made unto true Believers Wisdom, Righteousness; Sanctification and Redemption; and all these inwardly received?
A54120And is not God then the Saints Rule to discover this Mystery?
A54120And is not He then within us?
A54120And is not Resurrection applicable to that which is quickened?
A54120And is not the Natural( or Animal) Man doposed to the Renewed Man?
A54120And is not this in the renewed Man?
A54120And is not this our Love( or such Conformity) inherent in us, as we dwell in God, and God in us?
A54120And is not this the true Christ that thus knocketh?
A54120And likewise, Who hath resisted his Will, or the Might of his Pow ● … r?
A54120And must I be accounted a Knave, guilty of Deceit, a false deceitful Fellow for not writing all thy Impertinencies?
A54120And seeing every Seed hath its own proper Body, what Body can be proper to the Terrestrial Bodies?
A54120And shall they not then be answered herein?
A54120And so how dully and sorrily thou hast come off, to bring this as an Instance either against the Quakers or Revelation?
A54120And so with Relation to the first, he questions; Is not that of God, which comes out from God?
A54120And then I ask, if this Law doth not appertain to the New- Covenant as one principle Law thereof also?
A54120And then to the following Words, as it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated; where was it written?
A54120And then, Whether the cursed Workers of Iniquity( who live and dye in Sin) are not to be sentenced into the same Everlasting Fir ● …?
A54120And then, shall we sin, because we are no more under the Law, but under Grace?
A54120And then, what is it given for, and what can it do?
A54120And was all this either an Institution of Christ, or of Necessity to continue in the Church?
A54120And was not Christ both their Life, Light and Salvation?
A54120And was not he that Light of the Gentiles promised?
A54120And was not the Apostle Paul sent to turn the Gentiles from Darkness to Light?
A54120And was not this Believing of God a real Obeying?
A54120And were not his inward War- like Attempts against his Soul''s Enemy, both perfect and succesful, as well as his outward?
A54120And were they thereby directed to the right Way of worshipping the true God?
A54120And what Bodies have these Angels of God?
A54120And what Division would this make in God( and between Christ and Grace)?
A54120And what He or Him was this he speaks of?
A54120And what Proof is it against the Light, if one man calls it Light to day, and the same call it Darkness to morrow?
A54120And what Righteousness is that which is put on that is wrought within us?
A54120And what Scripture could he have for this pray you?
A54120And what be they?
A54120And what better Reason can it be to say, Men disobey the Light, therefore they never had it; whilst that proves they had it, at least as a Condemner?
A54120And what do they place their chief Happiness& Glory in?
A54120And what has Earth to do to either descend from Heaven, or 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A54120And what is that Christian Sabbath?
A54120And what is that in the Conscience, which the Preaching of the Gospel is manifest unto?
A54120And what is the Marrow of his Matter for this severe Conclusion upon us?
A54120And what shall become of all those Nations and People that have not the Scriptures, if this be true?
A54120And what was that that was called God and that was worshipped, above which this Son of Perdition exalted himself?
A54120And what were the Pricks that were hard for Saul to kick against?
A54120And where did ever any of us express such an Account of his Blood that was shed, as no more then that of a common ● … hief?
A54120And whether Christ himself did not with his own Hands give the Bread and the Wine to his Disciples, and yet bid them do it till he came?
A54120And whether the Mystery or thing signified, be attained by any in this Life?
A54120And whether will they go, and to what End, if they obey and follow it?
A54120And why dost thou argue against it, from mens persecuting and murtherous Thoughts, which arise from their Enmity and Rebellion against the Light?
A54120And why dost thou oppose the Scriptures to the Light within?
A54120And will thy reviling of G. Whitehead, as dealing deceitfully for but asking a sober Question, excuse thee in thy Malice and Confusion?
A54120And yet all are not saved; all do not know the Truth; and what hinders them?
A54120And yet does not his Light reprove Persecution and Murther?
A54120And yet that it doth not alwayes sig ● … ifie free from all Sin,& c. I ask then, What Christ maketh true Believers perfect in?
A54120Another asking, If a Man might do Ill, and conceal it from God?
A54120Are all these no disparagement to the Light within?
A54120Are both Beasts and Trees Immediate Effects of God''s Power?
A54120Are not these accounted of wit ● … the Lord from the Dignity of himself that worketh them?
A54120Are the Saints then but a Learning to fear the Lord God all the Dayes of their Life?
A54120As many as walk according to this Rule, Peace be on them and the whole Israel of God,& c. What Rule?
A54120B. then, who have not yet Cured themselves?
A54120Be plain and ingenuous herein; have you the Passover at a real Supper?
A54120Being demanded, what CONTINENCE is?
A54120Being demanded, wherein the Learned differ from the Unlearned?
A54120Being demanded, who live without Perturbation?
A54120Being demanded, whom he thought Richest?
A54120Besides the gross Liberty this gives to Sin; how agrees it with his teaching them to pray, Forgive us our Debts?
A54120But I ask, do you Baptists observe and keep a real Supper in the very same manner that Christ then did with his Disciples?
A54120But I pray, how holds this dying aftersown, with these men''s fleshly Opinion of the carnal Body in the Grave being the Seed?
A54120But according to Scripture, is it not an holy and spiritual End truely to ● … ear God, work Righteousness, and do Good?
A54120But again let us hear the same Book speak, Is there any Number of his Armies?
A54120But be it so that they were infallible; how came you to be assured they were so?
A54120But do you not tur ● … the Scriptures off, sor an uncertain& un ● … rviceable Writing, and as good as reject and deny them altogether?
A54120But do you press it in the Faith?
A54120But dost thou believe in thy Conscience, that he could intend any such thing with reference to the Deity of Christ?
A54120But doth he do as he would be done by?
A54120But doth not this signifie a very Dishonest and Malicious Mind in you?
A54120But hath it not been since; and is it not now the general Rule,& c?
A54120But how contradictory to this Fore- ordination of wicked Actions( which the Man hath unjustly accused God with) is his P ● … rmission of Sin?
A54120But how could they think so, if this Light in them did reprove for it?
A54120But how could you have known those Prophecies to be true, for that is not matter of Witnessing, but Fore- telling?
A54120But how will this determin the Controversie, and allay the Fury of Debates on foot?
A54120But if God had not revealed those things that are in Scripture by it to us, ● … ow could they have been known by us?
A54120But if the Light in every Man be Christ, how doth it bear our Sins, and are our Iniquities laid upon it?
A54120But if these men were fallible, as your own Principle makes them, and their own Determinations prove them; what then?
A54120But if this were a Punishment of their Sins to the full, then how could Justice punish them again with Indignation& Wrath?
A54120But is not the Scripture the Judge of Controversie?
A54120But is not the Scripture the Rule,& c. of our Day?
A54120But is not this to make void the Protestants Plea against the Papists, That the Scriptures are the Rule of Faith and Practice?
A54120But may some say, How is it then his Blood?
A54120But must we then suppose, as some Professors do, That these Bodies of Flesh and Bones, shall inherit the Kingdom of God, without any Blood in them?
A54120But now thou sayst it ought to be rejected: And hast thou not told us, that Christ is the Light and Life of men?
A54120But to the Question, Whether I do not deny his human Nature and glorious hyp ● … statical Union?
A54120But to wave this; Does not the same Objection lie aga ● … st the Sense of Scripture, since one sayes, this is the Sense, and another that?
A54120But were these the standing Rule?
A54120But what if Jews and Gentiles at any time did Apostatize, and particularly?
A54120But what is this Justification thou wouldst advance, as wholy wrought without thee?
A54120But what need of this, if they were personally elected( from an absolute Purpose of God) from Eternity?
A54120But what then doth he imagine this Lamb''s Book of Life is, and what is it made up of?
A54120But when doth he expect this divine Resemblance of God, or sinless Perfection to be brought forth?
A54120But why will he not in this Life?
A54120But, what a Stirring will there be in the Earth?
A54120But, who will yield to this, that doth not first resolve to be Overcome?
A54120By what Rule shall we be convinced that the Light within is the Rule, and hath Preheminence above the Scriptures?
A54120Caffin''s old Stufflong since answer''d) for was not Paul converted to the Light within, when he was sent to turn others from Darkness to Light?
A54120Can Faith and the Works that follow, without the Imputation of Christ''s Sufferings satisfie God''s Majesty for our Sin?
A54120Can I carry you all up with me in my Arms?
A54120Can a man be godly and not a Christian?
A54120Can either Christ''s Light within, or our following of it, invalidate or make void his Sufferings without?
A54120Can he see the Continuance of Evil good; or that his Command should not be kept?
A54120Can not the Soul be ● … erfectly Happy without this?
A54120Can the Work of Faith and Grace be sinful?
A54120Can there be any Imperfection or Darkness in the Day?
A54120Can we be both saved and Justified through this inward Washing of Regeneration, and yet not redeemed nor Justified through it?
A54120Canst think thou art Ingenuous?
A54120Christ as the Son of God is God''s anointed: And is it not granted that he was the Son of God by eternal Generation?
A54120Christ indeed fulfils the Law for us; but how?
A54120Come forth all ye Sloathful& Unprofitable Persons; Had not ye Talents committed to you for my Use and Service?
A54120Could he then pour forth his Wrath upon him for your Iniquities?
A54120Could not I have opened your Eyes?
A54120Couldst not thou have let me alone, to lie still at rest in this sweet Sleep?
A54120Did Christ ever by Sin provoke to this?
A54120Did I not stand in the Gates to call upon you?
A54120Did he hate him for nothing?
A54120Did he not cause both Plants and Trees to grow out of the Earth?
A54120Did he not substitute an Innocent Person to undergo the Punishment or Severity of the Law due to Sin and Sinners?
A54120Did he stand in the Covenant of Grace, or in God''s Favour all this time?
A54120Did he theresore decree the whole World to be saved?
A54120Did not Christ dye for all Men as well as you?
A54120Did not Christ say, What soever you ask in my Name, believe that you shall have it, and you shall receive it, or it shall be given you?
A54120Did not Hell gape for you long ago, and Devils long for this time, when you should be delivered into their Powers?
A54120Did not such and such do so and so?
A54120Did not the Lord against whom they had sinned?
A54120Did not they acknowledge Christ in them, the Immortal Word of Life and Light in them?
A54120Did not you hate Knowledge, and therefore disregard ● …?
A54120Did not you love Sin, and therefore shunned the Light* which would have discovered it, and disturbed you in your wicked Courses?
A54120Did the Father of T. Hicks get a B ● … ast or a Man when he begat him?
A54120Did the Light in Saul reprove him for Persecuting the Church?
A54120Did you ever hear such Doctrine before?
A54120Didst thou herein do like a natural Brother?
A54120Do they not speak in many places of the Sufferings, Pressures, Vexings, Burdenings, Grievings and Quenchings of the Spirit?
A54120Do we both put on a Righteousness that is within us, and a Righteousness that is not within us?
A54120Do you believe that the Being of evil Thoughts can be remov''d in this Life; else what signifies your pressing to repent thereof?
A54120Do you own the Souls Immortality, that it doth not dye with the Body?
A54120Do you, or did you ever know your own Souls?
A54120Does not the Apostle for a Proof of a justified State, instance it in the Gentiles, shewing the Effects of the Law written in their Hearts?
A54120Does our living up to them by an higher Rule make us to deny and reprobate them?
A54120Does the Declaration jarr or make weak that from whence it came?
A54120Doth it relate to them meerly as particular Persons, under such a Limitation of Election and Reprobation from Eternity?
A54120Doth not he himself confess that he verily thought he ought to do many things against the Name of Jesus?
A54120Doth not the Apostle say the contrary, Thou sowest not that Body that shall be?
A54120Doth not this shew as much a discontinuance of he Cup as the Passover?
A54120Doth not your Doctrine of such Rigid or Severe Satisfaction oppose Christ''s Intercession?
A54120Doth this argue that the Divine Light within is not the Rule above the Scriptures?
A54120Either the Light must obey it self, or Darkness must obey it?
A54120First we thought that Water- Baptism had been a fundamental Point with the Baptists; and do they and Presbyterians agree therein?
A54120First, Was he the Christ and true Saviour that was born of the Virgin yea or nay?
A54120First, What this Salvation is?
A54120For first, Is the st ● … nding Corn the self- same Seed that is put into the Earth?
A54120For is it the very self- same Grain of Wheat that is in the Eare that was sown in the Ground?
A54120For suppose any Omission through defect of Memory; Is this sufficient ground to conclude a man deceitful?
A54120For then, how should they reform, as he counsels them by his Light in their Consciences?
A54120For then, how were he either infinite or omni- present?
A54120For was not Job a Perfect Man both before and after his Deep Affliction?
A54120For which again he queries, Whether we do not tacitely deny the Resurrection of the Body?
A54120For who is this H E, whom God hath set forth, and in whom is Redemption?
A54120Forever: In all Capacities?
A54120God forbid, for how can we that are dead unto Sin live any longer therein?
A54120God forbid; for how can we that are dead unto Sin, live any longer therein?
A54120God is not the God of the Dead, that are so Dead as that they shall never return to Life; but of the Dead that shall return to Life?
A54120God was then his perfect Light and Rule in his Teachings; and is not that Light which is perfect whole?
A54120Grace differing from Debt: The Reason why God finds Fault with Men: The Question, Who hath resisted his Will?
A54120H. G. Darest thou say the Spirit can best supply those Ends without making use of the means God in his Word doth direct unto?
A54120H. G. Did the true Saviour die on the Cross or not?
A54120H. G. replyes, What sober Christian Man can find any Contradiction here against H. G?
A54120Had they these Dreams and Visions to instruct them in the sole Course of their Lives, or rather on particular Occasions?
A54120Had you an Eye, and yet not see, so as to understand?
A54120Hast not thou ● … ore- ordained them to rage& imagine vain things?
A54120Hast thou not told us, that man must be accountable to God for every Dispensation of Light?
A54120Hast thou used me as a Slave, and employed all my Members as Servants of Iniquity and Unrighteousness, and 〈 ◊ 〉 thou come now to Torment me?
A54120Have I affir ● … ed that Baptism or plunging Men and Women is Gospel?
A54120Have I said, it is of Necessity to Salvation?
A54120Have not the Baptists, whom Presbyterians call Anabaptists, been accounted Hereticks by the Presbyterians?
A54120Have you liked Darkness so well?
A54120Have you neglected me through Ignorance?
A54120He accounted Pleasures one of the greatest Mischiefs in the World; and being ask''d, what LEARNING was best?
A54120He answers, We are Partakers of the divine Nature; and how do we partake thereof, but by escaping the Corruptions of the World?
A54120He asked, If a State of Freedom from all these Sins were attainable in t ● … is Life?
A54120He pronounces such Miserable who conform themselves not to an Holy Life, but gives no Power to avoid the Curse?
A54120He scoffs at some of our Friends, saying, We own the Resurrection; that is, We witness it: and then adds, But what is it you witness?
A54120He tells us, It can not be a new Created Body, but a Resurrection; Of what?
A54120He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all: What made God''s Just ● … ce lay on so?
A54120Hence the Hope of the Hypocrite is compared to the Spiders Web, being spun out of their own Bowels?
A54120His conditional Promises, If thou dost well, shalt thou not be accepted?
A54120How are the dead raised, and with what Body?
A54120How can he avoid the Pope''s imagined Purgatory, unless he hold the Mortality of the Soul, that it dyes or sleeps in the Dust with the Body?
A54120How can that be, since the Q ● … estion most times arises about the Meaning of Scripture?
A54120How can they be the General Rule, that have not been General?
A54120How can they then be inexcusable, or left without Excuse before him?
A54120How causlesly dost thou quarrel?
A54120How could he receive the pouring forth or Gift of the holy Ghost without regarding the Light within?
A54120How far the Light in Man is necessary, and answers the Intent and Ends of Christ''s Sufferings?
A54120How fiercerly and horribly will they look one upon another?
A54120How hast thou manifested thy Folly herein?
A54120How long ye Simple Ones will you love Simplicity, and Fools ha ● … e Knowledge?
A54120How manifestly in consistent and contradictory are these?
A54120How much further doth Jesus himself in the Father''s Divine Glory transcend this Vision, though glorious?
A54120How much more shall the Blood of Christ, who offered himself without Spot to God, purge your Consciences from dead Works, to serve the Living God?
A54120How plainly do these Passages contradict our Opposers?
A54120How shall I be assured that these Scriptures came from God?
A54120How should they have Compassion to their immortal Souls, if God hath no Compassion nor Love towards them?
A54120How will these hold together?
A54120How, and with what Body are the Dead raised,& c?
A54120I am credibly informed of a Ranter that spake these Words above twenty Years ago; what''s that to the Quakers?
A54120I answer, are not the Father, the Spirit and the Word one?
A54120I ask him, whether will this Light guide their Paths, if not in the Way to Salvation?
A54120I deny his minor, as it depends on the Word only; for then, why are not all Men in the World justified, for whom Christ suffered and dyed?
A54120I have loved you, saith the Lord; yet ye, say, wherein hast thou loved us?
A54120I rather take this to be his Meaning, What are the Qualifications of those that obey this Light?
A54120I say, how do they know that these men rightly discerned true from sp ● … rious?
A54120I would ask that very Angry Man; Is there no Effect of Power, besides that of Nature?
A54120I would fain know what I must try them with?
A54120If God had particularly designed them for Death and Destruction, how should they then chuse Life?
A54120If God hath shined in our Hearts, and what may be known of God be manifest in Men; must they not turn to his Shining and Illumination?
A54120If God was so prest as a Cart with Sheaves, and his Spirit grieved by mens Sins, is it otherwise with his Seed in them?
A54120If Infants be supposed to arise at the Stature of Men, how can theirs be the self- same Bodies they were?
A54120If he cleanseth away all Guilt from Believers, and the reigning Power of Sin in this Life, Why should the Being of Sin remain till the next?
A54120If it be answered in the Affirmative, then what Body is it that God giveth to it, as it pleaseth him?
A54120If it reprove not these, what are the Evils it checks for?
A54120If so, how can any be deprived of Justification for whom Christ dyed?
A54120If the Latter, as manifestly I do, is the Scripture or that Man''s Sense of it my Rule?
A54120If the Love between the Soul and the Body were so great, when the Body was so vile, and the Soul so Sinful; what will it be when both are glorified?
A54120If the Question be, What is it that gives us Interest in Christ''s Righteousness?
A54120If the Question be, What will evidence our Faith to be living and sound Faith?
A54120If the Son of God before, was he not then Christ before?
A54120If then this IT be not the Body which dyed, but another, how can that be called a Resurrection; for that supposeth the same?
A54120If this Law and Light in the Conscience had been enough, what need had there been of Scripture?
A54120If this then be a Crime in an unconcern''d Wit, can it be excusable in a Christian, for such he would have us think him to be?
A54120If thou hadst mentioned the Name of this Maid, and proved the Accusation, what is this to the Body of the Quakers?
A54120If we had never exprest any such thing, how comest thou to judge our Thoughts to be such?
A54120If you should lay hold on us, would not the Angels snatch us out of your Arms?
A54120In all these who shall say to God, What doest thou?
A54120In him was Life, and the Life was the Light of Men, is this divine, yea or nay?
A54120In short, what is it to obey the Light?
A54120Is Christ the Life and Light of men?
A54120Is Christ the Object of Faith only as a Person without?
A54120Is He not also of the Gentiles?
A54120Is he grown so hardy, that he can handle Holy Things without Fear; and make bold with tender Conscience, so far as to abuse it self?
A54120Is it consistent and needful to Justification, y ● … a or nay?
A54120Is it in any thing consistent with Sin; or in himself in whom is no Sin, whom he that abideth in, sinneth not?
A54120Is it not easy to see a manifest Dissimulation and feigned Confederacy therein among these our Opposers?
A54120Is it not essential and of Necessity to Salvation, if part of Christ''s last Will and Testament, as before thou sayst?
A54120Is it not evident, that God is not engaged under Revenge( nor his Mercy and Truth divided or opposite) as this Man renders him?
A54120Is it not the Day of Christ that reveals, and so God himself that makes manifest this man of Sin?
A54120Is it not then to be had?
A54120Is it therefore ingenuous that I should be thus accused in these general Terms?
A54120Is it therefore just in thee to compare them to Jesuites and Romanists who thus intend?
A54120Is not Christ the Resurrection and the Life?
A54120Is not G. W. the Lyar and false Accuser?
A54120Is not He the best Robe?
A54120Is not his Mercy over all his Works?
A54120Is not man this Temple of God by right?
A54120Is not the Soul within?
A54120Is not the Worker above and Greater then the Work?
A54120Is not this dangerous for any to pervert them to their own Destruction?
A54120Is not this like the Language of Hell?
A54120Is not this living Bread from Heaven conf ● … st to be the Substance, and the ontward Bread the Shadow thereof?
A54120Is not this the Lord''s Supper in the Mystery or Anti- Type?
A54120Is not this the Lord''s Supper that''s above the Shadow?
A54120Is not your Fault double, because you have neglected Knowledge too?
A54120Is there Necessity where there''s Plenty, or a full Supply?
A54120Is this Canting or Gibberish?
A54120Is this a good Argument?
A54120Is this a matter to be taunted or scoffed at?
A54120Is this the Compensation, Payment and Satisfaction in our stead to vindictive Justice, so much pleaded by our Opposers?
A54120Is this to act the Christian, or the Scoffer towards the Quaker?
A54120KNOW YOU NOT THAT GOD IS NOT MADE WITH HANDS?
A54120May not the Satisfaction of your Wills and Lusts, the Promoting your Carnal Interests, be your chief Motive and Inducement?
A54120Must you not then have respect to something to be injoyed here as your Incouragement?
A54120Nay further, Do you not much differ among your selves in several principal matters?
A54120Needed, or could they make that more sure, which God had made so absolute?
A54120Neither is It beyond the Sea, that thou shouldst say, Who shall go over the Sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it and do it?
A54120Not by Inspiration; that is dangerous Doctrine with you: Which way was it then?
A54120Not what are their Names; but what kind or manner of People are they?
A54120Now I ask, what and where is that Door that he so universally knocks at?
A54120Now if this be truely to be acknowledged by Man or Mankind in general, why are Indians excluded?
A54120Now is it consistent with the Hope of the Hypocrite to obey the measure of the Light of Christ within, in order to receive more?
A54120Now take but away the Flesh, and where is the Body?
A54120Now the Question is not, Whether Christ was a most Satisfactory Sacrifice, or well- pleasing to the Father?
A54120Now what Disgrace is this to the Light Within?
A54120Now wouldst thou take it well, if I should endeavour to render you all odious upon their Account?
A54120Now, when I affirm that this refined State was attainable in this Life, were it not absurd to object, that it is not, because Job cursed his Day?
A54120O what did not the Blood- thirsty Spirit in its Day?
A54120Oh you dark, sottish, NightDreamers, when will you come out of your gross Darkness?
A54120Or are the Sufferings and Death of Christ absolutely meritorious for Man''s Justification without any Dependance upon his Light within?
A54120Or are they Insufficient, because they converse with Men through these exteriour things, suited to that imbecil State?
A54120Or can any receive the Benefit of Christ''s Sufferings and Blood without( or out of) his Light within?
A54120Or can it bind the strong Man, or kill man''s Corruptions, and yet not save him?
A54120Or deprive us of the End thereof, or of the Vertue of his Blood?
A54120Or did it reprove them for their manifold Superstitions?
A54120Or doth God bring such a severe Curse ● … pon any( as the giving up to strong Delusions) for walking after or following the Light within?
A54120Or doth God condemn Men for not improving more then he gives them?
A54120Or how should Reprobates turn from Sin, if eternally reprobated?
A54120Or how your Souls shall be invested hereafter?
A54120Or is it to lay down instituted Religion( as some ignorantly talk) to press after that which was be ● … ore, and ends those temporary things?
A54120Or no such thing as an infallible Light, because some have differed in some particular Cases that have profest it?
A54120Or that any should be thus detained in Prison, so long after the Debt is paid, and Satisfaction made, as he imagines?
A54120Or that the Being of Sin shall not be remov''d in this Life?
A54120Or upon which it is imputed or reckoned to us?
A54120Or was he the Son of God when he was not Christ?
A54120Or whether shall I flee from thy Presence?
A54120Or, that Christ is that true Light, that enlighteneth every Man coming into the World?
A54120Or, that after they are returned to Dust, they shall arise again the self same as they are, without any new Creation?
A54120Put on the whole Armour o ● … God,& c. Must these therefore not be within, but without only?
A54120Q Will you be so Liberal of your Revilings, whether your Adversary gives occasion or not?
A54120Rep. And what Kind of Satisfaction is it, he thinks this Justice requires?
A54120Rep. What Fear?
A54120Rep. What is it we contend for but Man''s being invested with the perfect and everlasting Righteousness of God himself, his own Nature and Image?
A54120Reprobation What it is?
A54120S. S. Because a Thing is written in the Scripture, are we to do it?
A54120S. S. Is Cod the Author of Sin in determining or fore- ordaining the wicked Actions of these Men?
A54120S. S. Is the Judge cruel that hangs up a Murtherer?
A54120Sanctification and Holiness; or a little Faith, and the Works that follow?
A54120Secondly, Are the Bodies Celestial( as those of Sun, Moon and Stars) one and the same with Terrestrial Bodies, as those of Men, Beasts and Fishes?
A54120Seeing he concludes, that no man can have a sufficient Light to guide him to Salvation that hath not the Spirit; what, can no man have it?
A54120Shall I seem Impious to them for Dissenting from their Gods?
A54120Some prickt to the very Heart, cryed out, What shall we do to he saved?
A54120Such as believe in it; IT, What?
A54120Surely if the Heathens do mind and follow so much Light as God has given them, they shall be saved; for is there any more required then what is given?
A54120Surely no: What if their Light was not so large?
A54120Surely no; sor th ● … n he would not ask, why?
A54120T. H. DId the Light in Saul reprove him for persecuting the Church?
A54120T. H. Did the Light in the Heathen- Philosophers check them for multiplying their Deityes?
A54120T. H. HOw could you call the Light within Christ, if some Scriptures had not mentioned Christ in you,& that he is the Life and Light of Men?
A54120T. H. WHo or what is it that obeyeth this Light, and in Obedience of it is saved?
A54120T. H. What intollerable Pride and Arogancy have you arrived to?
A54120T. H. What then is the Principle?
A54120THE second Question runs thus: What is that LIGHT which leadeth to Salvation?
A54120TO the Second Part of the Objection, If the Light in every Man were Christ, how comes it that the Jews and Greeks never called it so?
A54120Tell me what it is that doth influence and prevail with you to Do and Suffer as you do?
A54120Terrestrial, or Celestial; Carnal, or Spiritual?
A54120That if the Objecter understand Terrestrial Flesh and Bones, is it a Fault to deny it?
A54120That they may be saved; or onely to condemn them?
A54120That, answer''d CRITO, we shall observe; But how wilt thou be Buried?
A54120The Lord is my Light and my Salvation, whom shall I fear?
A54120The Question being, By what Rule shall we be convinced that the Scripture is the Rule, and hath Preheminnece above the Spirit?
A54120The Question, Who He, or They are that obey the Light,& c?
A54120The Question, Who hath resisted his Will?
A54120The Satisfaction, what?
A54120The Third Part of the Objection; If Christ was enjoyed under the Law, as he was, if the Light be Christ; why was he Typified?
A54120The third Part of the Objection: If Christ was enjoyed under the Law, as he was; If the Light be Christ, why was he typified?
A54120The 〈 ◊ 〉, Who He, or They are that obey the Light,& c?
A54120Then it seems there were Pricks; And where were they, if not in his Conscience?
A54120These are inconsistent: Must Men needs subject themselves to that, which is brought under by the Power of Christ, and Law of Life in him?
A54120This Argument signifies nothing at all sor his Purpose, nor would it help him one whit if it were all granted; for who questions God''s Omnisciency?
A54120Thou pretends to know what it can not do, but ● … elst us not what it can do, and to what end it will lead if truely obeyed?
A54120Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thy self?
A54120Though I suspect this Accusation not true; but if it were, doth thy inference follow, that our Proselites are thus taught?
A54120Though you may sustain some outward Losses; yet whether you have not a Way to augment your Outward Gain by Loosing?
A54120Thus he hath defined divine Justice, as he thinks( which is further spoken to hereafter) but upon whom must it be thus satisfied, supposeth he?
A54120To be guided by the Light within, is that you still boggle at; but is this Matter worthy of Excommunication?
A54120To teach, and then to baptize or dip them?
A54120To that Question, Will he say that Abraham did not in Faith circumcise his Son?
A54120To what place wilt thou limit or confine the divine Essence?
A54120True; But how agrees this with his Sense of Imputation?
A54120Turn unto me, and I will pour out my Spirit upon you, and make known my VVords unto you?
A54120VVhat can I do for you now?
A54120VVhat, will you leave us behind?
A54120VVhether PERFECTION, that is, a State freed from all Sin, be attainable in this Life?
A54120VVould not your Looks betray you to be none of our Number?
A54120WHat was the Nature and Extent of Christ''s Sufferings?
A54120WHether we are justified by the Righteousness of Christ imputed?
A54120Was Israel or Jacob''s Seed then after the Flesh eternally Elected and Loved?
A54120Was a private Letter from her such a great Occasion to print both it, and perverse Commentaries upon it against her?
A54120Was it by the Scripture?
A54120Was it from all Eternity, or rather in their Age and Time?
A54120Was it not David that is beloved, who as he entered into Covenant and Agreement with God, he was his Servant anointed with the holy Oyl?
A54120Was it not a Manifestation of the divine Life and Light?
A54120Was it not the Light?
A54120Was it not therefore Saving?
A54120Was not his saying, I have loved Jacob, intended, to reprove the Ingratitude and Unfaithfulness of those his Posterity?
A54120Was not the Jews Sabbath a Type of the Christians Sabbath, or Rest?
A54120Was not the Lord angrv with him?
A54120We ask if the Holy Ghost, or the Eternal Spirit be not God?
A54120We say, No; he is Just: But is this and his punishing your Sins in his Son to the full, a fit Parallel?
A54120Well said S. S. And is not Faith needful to Justification?
A54120Well said; Is Faith and Justification consistent, and Faith a Means thereof?
A54120Were Adam and Eve Inhuman in their being naked, when they were not ashamed, being Innocent?
A54120Were it Justice in the Creditor to detain the Debtor in Prison, if his Debts be all paid by the Surety?
A54120Were it Reasonable or true to say, the Creditor has forgiven both the Debt and Injury, if it be all paid and fully punished in the Surety?
A54120Were it good Doctrine to say, that Persection, as it respects the Sincerity and Uprightness of Saints is sinful?
A54120Were it not Blasphemy to suppose, That Christ hath bought for man that which his Father will not allow him?
A54120Were not this to mock them with a dissembling Proffer of Life, if the contrary be so unalterably designed for them?
A54120Were these Immediate?
A54120What Cruelty were this, to condemn Nations for want of the Scriptures?
A54120What Evil did he live and dye in?
A54120What Inconsistency is this?
A54120What Scriptures?
A54120What Sense or Congruity can be made of this?
A54120What a clattering of Bones together in the coming of Bone to his Bone?
A54120What an impertinent Question is this?
A54120What and where is that to be known, that is to change the Souls, and so the whole man''s Affections from Evil to Good, while man remains in this Life?
A54120What avails all this, when you press and preach thus in your Unbelief?
A54120What can we give to God for our Souls, proportionable to so Great a Loss, to so great Sufferings?
A54120What did the Blood of Christ that was shed, bespeak?
A54120What doest thou think it should be?
A54120What follows then?
A54120What hast thou against Immediate Revelation?
A54120What horrible Atheistical Stuff is this, thus to cry down the Light and Power of God within?
A54120What horrible Madness and gross Darkness hath the Devil led these Opposers into?
A54120What if Saul persecuted the Church of God, putting Disobedience for Duty, Murder for Service?
A54120What is Salvation?
A54120What is hard?
A54120What is his Ground from these?
A54120What is now become of this Man''s Religion?
A54120What is that SALVATION, which the Light leads to?
A54120What is the true or real Imputation of Righteousness?
A54120What is this LIGHT that leads to It?
A54120What is true Justification?
A54120What man but a Quaker would dare affirm this?
A54120What more holy then God''s Soveraignity over man, and man''s Subjection to, and Adoration of God?
A54120What must we then conclude, but that the Master may be very capable, were his Scholar so?
A54120What occasion to print and publish such a Book, so much reflecting thy natural Sister?
A54120What rare Rhetorick is this?
A54120What thinkest thou?
A54120What thinkst T. H. of this?
A54120What this Light is?
A54120What was the true Signification, Intent and Ends of Christ''s Sufferings?
A54120What was this Day, but compleat Salvation?
A54120What will become of such poor ● … eople, that are fed with such Chaff and Darknes, as this?
A54120What''s now the Matter, what do the Quakers speak of the Light within that''s given to every Man?
A54120What''s this but to tell us that the Scriptures can better ascertain us of the Truths therein then the Spirit that first gave forth those Truths?
A54120What?
A54120When did ever any of us express such contemptible Thoughts of Christ, his Offices or Sufferings?
A54120When they that crucified, murthered Christ were turned from his Light within?
A54120Where is God?
A54120Where or when did we ever preach such Doctrine?
A54120Where then and how is the Soul redeemed?
A54120Where wast thou when I laid the Foundations of the Earth?
A54120Where wouldst thou be perfectly free from Sin, if not in this Life?
A54120Whether God as Rector and Judge, could dispense with the Act of Law, and not rather with the immediate Object?
A54120Whether Impure( that is, unsanctified Persons) while 〈 ◊ 〉, be justified by the Imputation of Christ''s Righteousness?
A54120Whether Justification be by the Works of the Law, 〈 ◊ 〉 by the Righteousness of Christ through Faith?
A54120Whether PERFECTION, that is, a State sreed from all Sin, be attainable in this Life?
A54120Whether shall I go from thy Spirit?
A54120Whether the Devil and his Angels be not capable of Everlasting Fire, prepared for them without Terrestrial Bodies?
A54120Whether the Light of Christ within( in each Degree of it) be not the New- Covenant Light in Nature and Kind, and the certain Guide into this Covenant?
A54120Whether the Spirit of Man doth not return unto God that gave it, to receive its Judgment and Reward?
A54120Whether the Wicked be capable of absolute Misery when separate from the Earthly Tabernacle; Yea, or Nay?
A54120Whether this Body of Flesh and Bones shall arise again?
A54120Which was for all Men; but what Proof hath he from Scripture, That the shedding Christ''s Blood was the Meritorious Cause of Justification?
A54120Who of us ever asserted Grace to be a Debt to any Man?
A54120Who they are that do obey this Light, and in obeying attain Salvation?
A54120Whom makest thou thy self?
A54120Why are we not then to have as spiritual a Sense of the Resurrection?
A54120Why art thou so wilfully quarrelsom?
A54120Why do not you turn to Chapter and Verse for Satisfaction, if the Scripture be appointed of God for a Rule?
A54120Why do they now joyn against the Quakers( so called)?
A54120Why do you not rather take Wrong?
A54120Why doth he yet find Fault?
A54120Why for you more then the whole World besides?
A54120Why should Men covet to Know so far beyond what they do faithfully Practise?
A54120Why then dost thou now suppose the whole Person to be the Subject, when thou art not real in what thou implyest of the whole Persons being obedient?
A54120Will God punish where there is no Sin?
A54120Will he say, None are Sanctified that have any Sin in them?
A54120Will his telling us of Christ''s Death imputed, p. 97. make up the Matter?
A54120Will it follow, that the Light was Insufficient?
A54120Would it have been a good Answer for any to have said, Lord, why dost thou ask?
A54120Would not Sighs and Groans have been understood?
A54120Would not your black and Trembling Joynts speak what you are?
A54120Would such an Argument against the Scriptures being the Rule please him, because they contain not all that was done?
A54120Would the Running Mad of some Men be a good Argument to prove Mankind irrational?
A54120Wouldst thou thus be dealt by concerning thy Water- Baptism, or pretended Gospel- Institutions?
A54120Yea, doth not Christ tell his Disciples, that some would kill them, and yet think they did God Service?
A54120Yet thou hast granted to Perfection, as sincere and upright, p. 50. and is not this Perfection of Sincerity and Uprightness without Sin?
A54120You have not from the Beginning of your Life to the End perfectly obeyed the Law; what have you to say why you should not bear the Curse?
A54120],[ London?
A54120able to apprehend and bring Man clearly to see the Invisible things of God, even his Eternal Power and Godhead?
A54120also the Homousian and Arrian about Christ''s Divinity; or the Papists or Protestants about Trans- substantiation?
A54120and 3. Who this HE, or THEY are, that Obey this Light, and in Obeing attain Salvation?
A54120and for not believing that Jesus is the Christ?
A54120and hath he not Forgiveness in store?
A54120and hath not this man confessed that we are saved by the Washing of Regeneration?
A54120and how doth it relate to Jacob and Esau?
A54120and how plainly doth he charge men''s Ignorance( and Defects for want of Obedience) upon the Light within?
A54120and how variable and in Contrariety with himself?
A54120and if he pleaseth to give me leave, I will add to this Question, How doth It Lead to Salvation?
A54120and in what did it consist?
A54120and is it not 〈 ◊ 〉 then that you should go to the Place where there is Blackness of Darkness forever?
A54120and is not his Patience highly commended of, who said, when I am tried I shall come forth as Gold?
A54120and is this the Fruit of all the Pleasures we have taken together?
A54120and must this be understood only of the Dust of dissolved Bodies without any Creation?
A54120and that as in Adam all dye, so in Christ shall all be made alive?
A54120and upon whom doth not his Light Arise?
A54120and was not love one to another both the Old and New Commandment; yea, the Old Commandment renewed and established?
A54120and was not this preached by Christ''s Ministers?
A54120and what a Babylonish Structure do they erect upon their uncertain Conjectures and dubious Interpretations, from their fallible Spirits and Judgments?
A54120and what have ye done with them?
A54120and what is our Sense of Christ''s Blood; and for what End owned?
A54120and what need of Reforming what God hath fore- ordained?
A54120and what was that that prict him before?
A54120and wherein the Glory of the one so far exceedeth the other?
A54120and why typified out to come, when he was come before, and whilst typified?
A54120are they and their secrets to be judged by a Law or Light which they never had in secret?
A54120but whether it be a divine Light of Christ( which I affirm) or but a Creature?
A54120but, Whether such a State of Perfection be attainable in this Life?
A54120doth this therefore prove the Light not a Sufficient Rule?
A54120following( which I have already cited) Whither shall I go from thy Spirit?
A54120for did Job do so all his Life time; or did his Perfection reach no higher?
A54120how often have you mocked God?
A54120how often would I have gathered thee, and thou wouldest not,& c?
A54120if I be uncertain, why dare I be so bold as to preach it?
A54120if from Eternity God had reprobated them, or absolutely ordained and designed their Damnation and Curse, how should they Chuse Life or Blessing?
A54120no indwelling Spirit, and yet dwelling in all Believers?
A54120nor, Whether Election( which i ● … in the Seed) doth not in due time extend to particular Persons?
A54120or how should good or acceptable Fruits be brought forth to God, if not from an inward and Everlasting Righteousness?
A54120or how should their not obeying the Truth, but Unrighteousness, be charged upon them, if the Truth were never afforded them?
A54120or how 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 be the same( Flesh Blood and Bones) after 〈 ◊ 〉 to dust without any new Creation, as some Baptists affirm?
A54120or is not that of a justifying Nature which pleaseth God?
A54120or rather to their Posterities, as under such different Qualifications of Love and Hatred?
A54120or that one man calleth one thing a Sin, another calleth it a Duty?
A54120or theirs saing of Christ, will he kil himself?
A54120or to suffe ● … the Surety to wait long soliciting or interceeding for his Pardon or Deliverance?
A54120or was Victory over, and Freedom from that Evil not attainable by him in this Life?
A54120or what Body more radient or refulgent then the Sun in his greatest Brightness can be vitally Organized, but it must be of an Heavenly Nature indeed?
A54120or what Sin must remain in him, now being deceased, till the End of the World?
A54120or what is the Place of my Rest?
A54120or would not Devils tear you away from us?
A54120or, what Service could Esau in Hell do Jacob in Heaven?
A54120ought that which is mis- guiding to be obeyed?
A54120p 26. l. 7. for this before Light?
A54120p. 21. l. 34. for Who, Me?
A54120read Who?
A54120read this Light before?
A54120shut up in Temples?
A54120the Light of Jesus Christ as the Eternal Word?
A54120the Lord is the Strength of my Life, of whom shall I be afraid?
A54120the Resurrection of the Seed?
A54120their Flesh roast?
A54120their Tongues roar?
A54120thou blind Guide, how darest thou thus accuse and undervalue the Light of Christ within, contrary to thy many Concessions elsewhere?
A54120unto thee?
A54120was I not willing*?
A54120were they Human, Earthly Bodies, or Angelical?)
A54120what Cryes and Shreeks will the Tongue give forth, so soon as it hath recovered its Use?
A54120what Glad Tidings are these to the Hypocrites and Drunkards?
A54120what Likeness will ye compare unto Him?
A54120what Scripture has he for this Distinction?
A54120what Scripture hath H. G. for this distinction?
A54120what can I do for you then?
A54120where is the Disputer of this World?
A54120where is the Scribe?
A54120whether he ministers Bread and Wine as a Figure, or the Substance?
A54120whether that was not the Christ, before it took up the Body, after it took up Body, and ever?
A54120who among the Sons of the Mighty can be Likened unto the Lord?
A54120why thinks he, can not this acquit us or render us acceptable to God?
A54120with the Scriptures?
A54120with what Face could you look upon him, when you are so Black and Filthy?
A54120— Again, Who can see with Fleshly Eyes the Heavenly, True and Immortal God, whose Seat is in the Highest of Heaven?
A54120— Could we carry you up with us?
A54120— How will they be affrighted at the Apparition of* so many Devils about them?
A54120— Is Christ divided?
A54120— The Body to the Soul, And hast thou found me out, O my Enemy?
A54120— What greater Pleasure then to behold the Serene Aspect of God?
A54120— Where is the Wise?
A54120— Who in Heaven can be Compared unto the Lord?
A54120—* Again, Wonderest thou that Men go to God?
A54120〈 ◊ 〉 Intend the same Body( respecting the Matter or Substance of it) which was buried and laid in the Grave?
A54120〈 ◊ 〉* He takes It for Idem, the Self same Body; but where hath he this ● … ither from the Greek or Latine on the place cited?