Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
8110If you ca n''t now live_ with_ the land, how will you then live without it?
22681By the latter, we are forced to muse, and ponder sadly,"O, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?"
22681It appears to have been the only address of Lincoln''s in which he made use of his favorite poem,--"Oh, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?"
22681It is in the letter of April 18, 1846, that Lincoln refers to the poem,"Oh why should the spirit of mortal be proud?"
22681MORTALITY BY WILLIAM KNOX Oh, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?
22681The author of the poem,"Oh, why should the spirit of mortal be proud?"
39204Is there any better or equal hope in the world?
39204Why should they do anything for us if we will do nothing for them?
39204_ EIGHTH_ What is the influence of fashion but the influence that other people''s actions have on our actions?
39204_ EIGHTH_ Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?
39204_ ELEVENTH_ Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
39204_ FOURTH_ Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak to maintain its own existence?
39204_ SECOND_ What is the use of putting up the gap when the fence is down all around?
39204_ SIXTEENTH_ What will the country say?
39204_ THIRD_ If Almighty God gives a man a cowardly pair of legs, how can he help their running away with him?
39204_ THIRTEENTH_ Are you not over- cautious?
39204_ THIRTIETH_ Should any one in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept?
39204_ TWENTIETH_ Are you strong enough?
39204_ TWENTY- EIGHTH_ Will anybody do your work for you?
39204_ TWENTY- SECOND_ Object whatsoever is possible, still the question recurs,"Can we do better?"
39204but"Can we all do better?"
9And should any one in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to HOW it shall be kept?
9Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
9Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
9In our present differences is either party without faith of being in the right?
9Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
9Is it true, then, that any right, plainly written in the Constitution, has been denied?
9Is there any better or equal hope in the world?
9Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose a new Union, as to produce harmony only, and prevent renewed secession?
9MUST Congress protect slavery in the Territories?
9May Congress prohibit slavery in the Territories?
9One party to a contract may violate it-- break it, so to speak; but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?
9Shall fugitives from labor be surrendered by national or State authority?
9To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak?
9Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?
9Will you hazard so desperate a step while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you fly from have no real existence?
9Will you, while the certain ills you fly to are greater than all the real ones you fly from-- will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake?
5024And as it is to so go at all events, may we not agree that the sooner the better?
5024And if A and B should agree, how can they know but that the General Government here will reject their plan?
5024And in any event, can not the North decide for itself whether to receive them?
5024And why may we not continue that ratio far beyond that period?
5024Are they not already in the land?
5024But why any proclamation now upon this subject?
5024But why should emancipation South send the free people North?
5024But why tender the benefits of this provision only to a State government set up in this particular way?
5024Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
5024Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
5024Can we, can they, by any other means so certainly or so speedily assure these vital objects?
5024Could the one in any way greatly disturb the seven?
5024Has it more waste surface by mountains, rivers, lakes, deserts, or other causes?
5024If, then, for a common object this property is to be sacrificed, is it not just that it be done at a common charge?
5024If, then, we are at some time to be as populous as Europe, how soon?
5024Is it doubted that it would restore the national authority and national prosperity and perpetuate both indefinitely?
5024Is it doubted that we here-- Congress and Executive can secure its adoption?
5024Is it doubted, then, that the plan I propose, if adopted, would shorten the war, and thus lessen its expenditure of money and of blood?
5024Is it inferior to Europe in any natural advantage?
5024Is it less fertile?
5024Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
5024Is it true, then, that colored people can displace any more white labor by being free than by remaining slaves?
5024It is not"Can any of us imagine better?"
5024Object whatsoever is possible, still the question recurs,"Can we do better?"
5024Why may not our country at some time average as many?
5024Will liberation make them any more numerous?
5024Will not the good people respond to a united and earnest appeal from us?
5024but"Can we all do better?"
2659Mr. President,said Governor Randall,"why ca n''t you seek seclusion, and play hermit for a fortnight?
2659We have to hold territory in inclement and sickly places; where are the Democrats to do this? 2659 3.30 p.m. GENERAL SULLIVAN, Harper''s Ferry: Have you anything new from Winchester, Martinsburg or thereabouts? 2659 : The President directs me to inquire whether a day has yet been fixed for the execution of citizen Robert Louden, and if so what day? 2659 A. LINCOLN, ORIGIN OF THEGREENBACK"CURRENCY TO COLONEL B. D. TAYLOR EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December[ 16?
2659About how old is he?
2659And as it is to so go at all events, may we not agree that the sooner the better?
2659And how is it to be at"this place"--and that is Saint Louis?
2659And if A and B should agree, how can they know but that the General Government here will reject their plan?
2659And if so why is it done?
2659But how is there a session before the recent election returns are in?
2659But what next?
2659But why any proclamation now upon this subject?
2659But why tender the benefits of this provision only to a State government set up in this particular way?
2659Can Louisiana be brought into proper practical relation with the Union sooner by sustaining or by discarding her new State government?
2659Can it be?
2659Can not you help me out with it?
2659Can there be a worse case than to desert and with letters persuading others to desert?
2659Can you not come?
2659Could you, without embarrassment, assign him a place, if directed to report to you?
2659Did you not receive them?
2659Did you receive the despatch?
2659Do the 1500 prisoners reported by General Sedgwick include the 400 taken by General French, or do the Whole amount to 1900?
2659Do they not have the hardest of it?
2659Does Joe Heiskell''s"walking to meet us"mean any more than that"Joe"was scared and wanted to save his skin?
2659From returns received at the Navy Department it appears that more than 1,000 vessels have been captured since the blockade was instituted?
2659Has he been a good soldier except the desertion?
2659How is it?
2659How is your son?
2659INTERVIEW WITH JOHN T. MILLS, AUGUST[ 15?
2659If not, does it indicate anything?
2659Is there any good objection?
2659Is there any sign of the rebel legislature coming together on the understanding of my letter to you?
2659It is a pertinent question, When is this war to end?
2659MAJOR- GENERAL BURNSIDE, Knoxville, Tenn.: What is the news?
2659MAJOR- GENERAL ORD, Army of the James Is it true that George W. Lane is detained at Norfolk without any charge against him?
2659MAJOR- GENERAL SICKLES, New York: Could you, without it being inconvenient or disagreeable to yourself, immediately take a trip to Arkansas for me?
2659May I ask those who have not differed with me to join with me in this same spirit towards those who have?
2659May I use it?
2659Shall I give him a pass for that object?
2659Shall they be admitted?
2659Tad wants some flags-- can he be accommodated?
2659The question is, Will it be wiser to take it as it is and help to improve it, or to reject and disperse?
2659WASHINGTON, D. C., July 9, 1864 J. W. GARRETT, Camden Station: What have you heard about a battle at Monocacy to- day?
2659Was it possible to lose the nation and yet preserve the Constitution?
2659Well, what does Sandy Hook say about operations of enemy and of Sigel during to- day?
2659What say you?
2659What say you?
2659When did he desert?
2659When do you expect to be here?
2659Who should quail while they do not?
2659Why shall A adopt the plan of B rather than B that of A?
2659Will the Secretary of War please accord it to him?
2659Will you march on with him?
2659You came, and I said to you:"What can we do?"
2659what does this mean?
2659when did he write the letters?
14274I desire him to answer whether he is opposed to the acquisition of any new territory unless slavery is first prohibited therein?
14274I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to the prohibition of the slave- trade between the different States?
14274I desire to know whether Lincoln today stands as he did in 1854, in favor of the unconditional repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law?
14274I want to know whether he stands to- day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia?
14274Advocated by whom?
14274And how much would it avail you, if you could, by the use of John Brown, Helper''s Book, and the like, break up the Republican organization?
14274And is it not needed whenever taking it helps us or hurts the enemy?
14274And should any one in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept?
14274And why may we not for fifty times as long?
14274And why the hasty after- indorsement of the decision by the President and others?
14274Are you for it?
14274Are you for it?
14274Are you in favor of acquiring additional territory, in disregard of how such acquisition may affect the nation on the slavery question?
14274At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected?
14274But can we, for that reason, run ahead, and infer that he will make any particular change, of which he himself has given no intimation?
14274But does Judge Douglas''s reply amount to a satisfactory answer?
14274But how can we attain it?
14274But if it is, how can he resist it?
14274But it may be asked, why suppose danger to our political institutions?
14274But you are perhaps ready to ask,"What has this to do with the perpetuation of our political institutions?"
14274By what means shall we fortify against it?
14274Can Louisiana be brought into proper practical relation with the Union sooner by sustaining or by discarding her new State government?
14274Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
14274Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
14274Can he possibly show that it is less a sacred right to buy them where they can be bought cheapest?
14274Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
14274Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
14274Can we cast our votes with their view, and against our own?
14274Can we safely base our action upon any such vague inference?
14274Can we, can they, by any other means so certainly or so speedily assure these vital objects?
14274Could Washington himself speak, would he cast the blame of that sectionalism upon us, who sustain his policy, or upon you, who repudiate it?
14274Did we brave all then to falter now?--now, when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered, and belligerent?
14274Do you accept the challenge?
14274Do you think differently?
14274Does Douglas believe an effort to revive that trade is approaching?
14274Does he really think so?
14274Does it appear otherwise to you?
14274Have we no tendency to the latter condition?
14274Have we not preserved them for more than fifty years?
14274How can he oppose the advances of slavery?
14274How can we best do it?
14274How, then, shall we perform it?--At what point shall we expect the approach of danger?
14274I ask by whose authority?
14274If they wanted it amended, why did they not offer the amendment?
14274In our present differences is either party without faith of being in the right?
14274In view of our moral, social, and political responsibilities, can we do this?
14274In what way can that compromise be used to keep Lee''s army out of Pennsylvania?
14274Is it doubted that it would restore the national authority and national prosperity, and perpetuate both indefinitely?
14274Is it doubted that we here-- Congress and Executive-- can secure its adoption?
14274Is it doubted, then, that the plan I propose, if adopted, would shorten the war, and thus lessen its expenditure of money and of blood?
14274Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?
14274Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
14274Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
14274Is it true, then, that any right, plainly written in the Constitution, has been denied?
14274Is not that the fact?
14274Is there any better or equal hope in the world?
14274Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose a new Union, as to produce harmony only, and prevent renewed secession?
14274Is there, has there ever been, any question that, by the law of war, property, both of enemies and friends, may be taken when needed?
14274It is not"Can any of us imagine better?"
14274It simply leaves the inquiry:"What was the understanding those fathers had of the question mentioned?"
14274Made by whom?
14274No?
14274Now, can you, or not, be prevailed upon to pause and to consider whether this is quite just to us, or even to yourselves?
14274Now, my friends, can this country be saved on that basis?
14274Object whatsoever is possible, still the question occurs,"Can we do better?"
14274One party to a contract may violate it-- break it, so to speak; but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?
14274Shall fugitives from labor be surrendered by national or by State authority?
14274Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow?
14274The fact is substantially true; but does it prove the issue?
14274The poem from which he most frequently quoted and which seems to have impressed him most was,"Oh, Why Should the Spirit of Mortal be Proud?"
14274The question is, will it be wiser to take it as it is and help to improve it, or to reject and disperse it?
14274The question recurs, What will satisfy them?
14274The question recurs,"How shall we fortify against it?"
14274The question then is, Can that gratification be found in supporting and maintaining an edifice that has been erected by others?
14274These natural and apparently adequate means all failing, what will convince them?
14274To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak?
14274We deny it; and what is your proof?
14274Well, on Saturday he did make his answer, and what do you think it was?
14274What induced the Southampton insurrection, twenty- eight years ago, in which at least three times as many lives were lost as at Harper''s Ferry?
14274What is conservatism?
14274What is the frame of Government under which we live?
14274What is the question which, according to the text, those fathers understood"just as well, and even better, than we do now?"
14274What reason does he propose?
14274What would that other channel probably be?
14274Why better after the retraction than before the issue?
14274Why did they not put it in themselves?
14274Why did they stand there taunting and quibbling at Chase?
14274Why even a Senator''s individual opinion withheld till after the presidential election?
14274Why mention a State?
14274Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?
14274Why should they do anything for us if we will do nothing for them?
14274Why the delay of a reargument?
14274Why the incoming President''s advance exhortation in favor of the decision?
14274Why the outgoing President''s felicitation on the indorsement?
14274Why was the amendment, expressly declaring the right of the people, voted down?
14274Why was the court decision held up?
14274Will it satisfy them if, in the future, we have nothing to do with invasions and insurrections?
14274Will not the good people respond to a united and earnest appeal from us?
14274Will they be satisfied if the Territories be unconditionally surrendered to them?
14274Will you hazard so desperate a step while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you fly from have no real existence?
14274Will you, while the certain ills you fly to are greater than all the real ones you fly from-- will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake?
14274Would the number of John Browns be lessened or enlarged by the operation?
14274Would you have that question reduced to its former proportions?
14274You can not escape this conclusion; and yet, are you willing to abide by it?
14274You produce your proof; and what is it?
14274_ May_ Congress prohibit slavery in the Territories?
14274_ Must_ Congress protect slavery in the Territories?
14274but,"Can we all do better?"
14274think you these places would satisfy an Alexander, a Caesar, or a Napoleon?
2653And suppose the people attempt to suspend, by refusing to pay; what then? 2653 Another?"
2653But,says one,"what good can I do by signing the pledge?
2653But,you will say,"do not your causes apply to every one engaged in a like undertaking?"
2653How are you, Jeff?
2653I ask, What is the real situation of the agriculturalist? 2653 I know it; and what of that?
2653Q.--Did you remove the same by injunction to the Sangamon Circuit Court? 2653 The hour is yet to come, yea, nigh at hand--(how long first do you reckon?)
2653There now,says he,"did you ever see such a piece of impudence and imposition as that?"
2653Tyler appointed him?
2653What about?
2653What do you want, Peggy?
2653What does he drink?
2653Will the greedy gullet of the penitentiary be satisfied with swallowing him instead of all of them, if they should venture to obey him? 2653 And after they have found the bank to be unconstitutional, and decided it so, how are they to enforce their decision? 2653 And for what? 2653 And was the sacred name of Democracy ever before made to indorse such an enormity against the rights of the people? 2653 And who that thinks with me will not fearlessly adopt the oath that I take? 2653 And why may we not for fifty times as long? 2653 And why not? 2653 And why shall the Whigs not all rally again? 2653 And would he not discover some''danger of loss,''and be off about the time it came to taking their places? 2653 Are their principles less dear now than in 1840? 2653 Are they to be clothed with power to send for persons and papers, for this object? 2653 At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? 2653 At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? 2653 Bowling Greene, Bennette Abe? 2653 But I want to ask a close question,Are you now in feeling as well as judgment glad that you are married as you are?"
2653But besides all this, if the Bank were struck from existence, could not the owners of the capital still loan it usuriously, as well as now?
2653But it may be asked, Why suppose danger to our political institutions?
2653But supposing we had the authority, I would ask what good can result from the examination?
2653But what could I do?
2653But what is it you''re mad about?"
2653But which system shall be adopted?
2653But you are perhaps ready to ask,"What has this to do with the perpetuation of our political institutions?"
2653But, had the old- school champions themselves been of the most wise selecting, was their system of tactics the most judicious?
2653By what means shall we fortify against it?
2653Can any man of the least penetration fail to see the object of this?
2653Can we declare the Bank unconstitutional, and compel it to desist from the abuses of its power, provided we find such abuses to exist?
2653Can we repair the injuries which it may have done to individuals?
2653Can you tell me anything about the matter?
2653Can you tell me where they are?
2653Commenting on Weber''s affidavit, Gen. Adams asks,"Why this fright and confusion?"
2653Did I say Talbott had not seen it?
2653Did I say anything that was inconsistent with his having seen it before?
2653Did I say what Talbott found it in?
2653Did you court her for her wealth?
2653Did you not think, and partly form the purpose, of courting her the first time you ever saw her or heard of her?
2653Do you believe you could bear that patiently?
2653Do you remember my going to the city, while I was in Kentucky, to have a tooth extracted, and making a failure of it?
2653Does not every merchant have his secret mark?
2653Does not this clearly prove, when there is no market at home or abroad, that there[ is] too much labor employed in agriculture?
2653Dr. Holmes, when asked by an anxious young mother,"When should the education of a child begin?"
2653Have any of their doctrines since then been discovered to be untrue?
2653Have they gone over to the enemy?
2653Have we not preserved them for more than fifty years?
2653Have you time to listen to his two- minutes speech at Gettysburg, at the dedication of the Soldiers''Cemetery?
2653How came you to court her?
2653How could the fruits follow?
2653How then could Talbott open the deed and point out the error?
2653How then shall we perform it?
2653If Talbott did find it in another paper at his office, is that any reason why he could not have folded it in a deed and brought it to my office?
2653If any individual had been injured in this way, is there not an ample remedy to be found in the laws of the land?
2653If it was true, why was it not writ till five days after the proclamation?
2653If the Bank be inflicting injury upon the people, why is it that not a single petition is presented to this body on the subject?
2653If the Bank really be a grievance, why is it that no one of the real people is found to ask redress of it?
2653If, then, what I have been saying is true, is it wonderful that some should think and act now as all thought and acted twenty years ago?
2653In all candor let me ask, was such a system for benefiting the few at the expense of the many ever before devised?
2653In that arrest all can give aid that will; and who shall be excused that can and will not?
2653Is common sense to be abused with such sophistry?
2653Is it not because there would be something egregiously unfashionable in it?
2653Is there anything in law requiring them to perjure themselves at the bidding of James Shields?
2653Is there anything suspicious about it?
2653Is there in all republics this inherent weakness?"
2653Is there just cause for this?
2653Is this a mysterious story?
2653Is this the man that is to raise a breeze in his favor by abusing lawyers?
2653January[ 1?
2653January[?
2653May I ask those who were with me to join with me in the same spirit toward those who were against me?"
2653Most certainly I did neither; and if I did not, what becomes of the argument?
2653Mr. Lincoln asked what caused the heat, if it was not party?
2653None of that nonsense, Jeff; there ai n''t an honester woman in the Lost Townships than..."--"Than who?"
2653Oh, say the examiners, we can injure the credit of the Bank, if nothing else, Please tell me, gentlemen, who will suffer most by that?
2653Ought any, then, to refuse their aid in doing what good the good of the whole demands?
2653P. S Will you write me again?
2653Printer, will you be sure to let us know in your next paper whether this Shields is a Whig or a Democrat?
2653Say candidly, were not those heavenly black eyes the whole basis of all your early reasoning on the subject?
2653Shall he now be arrested in his desolating career?
2653Shall he who can not do much be for that reason excused if he do nothing?
2653Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow?
2653Suppose the committee should find it true, can they redress the injured individuals?
2653Suppose this to be true, are we to send a committee of this House to inquire into it?
2653The election came, and what was the result?
2653The grand inquiry now is, Shall we make our own comforts, or go without them at the will of a foreign nation?
2653The question recurs, How shall we fortify against it?
2653The question then is, Can that gratification be found in supporting and in maintaining an edifice that has been erected by others?
2653There would be nothing irreligious in it, nothing immoral, nothing uncomfortable-- then why not?
2653This wish was gratified; but how?
2653Upon the same rule, Why might not I fly from the decision against me in Sangamon, and get up instructions to their delegates to go for me?
2653Was it because you thought she deserved it, and that you had given her reason to expect it?
2653Was it not that you found yourself unable to reason yourself out of it?
2653Was it possible to lose the nation and yet preserve the Constitution?
2653What can there be in such a connection, that the people of Illinois are willing to pay their money to get a peep into?
2653What difference is it to them whether the stock is owned by Judge Smith or Sam Wiggins?
2653What do you mean by that?
2653What earthly consideration would you take to find her scouting and despising you, and giving herself up to another?
2653What good, then, can their labors result in?
2653What had reason to do with it at that early stage?
2653What interest, let me ask, have the people in the settlement of this question?
2653What one of us but can call to mind some relative, more promising in youth than all his fellows, who has fallen a sacrifice to his rapacity?
2653What reason, then, is there to believe they will hereafter do better?
2653What then becomes of all their sophistry about Adams not being fool enough to forge an assignment that would not cover the case?
2653What will their decision amount to?
2653What, then, if the Bank has chosen to exercise this right?
2653When did the Whigs ever fail if they were fully aroused and united?
2653Where has the American farmer a market for his surplus produce?
2653Where, now, is that mighty host?
2653Who and what are they?
2653Who of the five appointed is to write the district address?
2653Whom can it injure?
2653Whom does he consider disinterested?
2653Why did n''t Carlin and Carpenter sign it as well as Shields?
2653Why then shall we spend the public money in such employment?
2653Why, then, is it, when neither law nor justice forbids it, that we are asked to spend our time and money in inquiring into its truth?
2653Why, then, shall we suffer a severe difficulty, even though it be but temporary, unless we receive some equivalent for it?
2653Will the collectors, that have taken their oaths to make the collection, dare to end it?
2653and is it just to assail, condemn, or despise them for doing so?
2653and who is ever silly enough to complain of it?
2653says I;"ai n''t its hair the right color?
2653says Jeff;"and whose egg is it, pray?"
2653says he;"but how will we find out?"
2653says he;"what the mischief are you about?"
2653think you these places would satisfy an Alexander, a Caesar, or a Napoleon?
2656After all, the question still recurs upon us, How did that fraud originally get into the State Register?
2656Ai n''t the Judge playing the cuttle- fish?
2656And how is it he tells us they can exclude it?
2656And, more especially, can he pass unfriendly legislation to violate his oath?
2656But does not this question make a disturbance outside of political circles?
2656But has it proved so?
2656But here they are, and the question is, How can they be best dealt with?
2656But here they are, and the question is, How can they be best dealt with?
2656But let me ask Judge Douglas how he is going to get the people to do that?
2656But was it not understood or intimated with the"confident promise"of putting an end to the slavery agitation?
2656But when I have admitted all this, I ask if there is any parallel between these things and this institution of slavery?
2656Can he be induced to tell, or, if he has told, can Judge Douglas be induced to tell how it originally was concocted?
2656Can he withhold it without violating his oath?
2656Did any one of the thirteen colonies entertain such a design or expectation?
2656Did he not appeal to the"MOBS,"as he calls them?
2656Did he not do right, when he had the fit opportunity of meeting Judge Douglas here, to tell him he was ready for the responsibility?
2656Did he not make speeches in the lobby to show how villainous that decision was, and how it ought to be overthrown?
2656Did he not succeed, too, in getting an act passed by the Legislature to have it overthrown?
2656Did not he and his political friends find a way to reverse the decision of that same court in favor of the constitutionality of the National Bank?
2656Do n''t you remember how two years ago the opponents of the Democratic party were divided between Fremont and Fillmore?
2656Do the resolutions touch me at all?
2656Do we not feel an interest in getting to that outlet with such institutions as we would like to have prevail there?
2656Do we not wish for an outlet for our surplus population, if I may so express myself?
2656Do you not constantly argue that this is not the right place to oppose it?
2656Does Douglas say that is a forgery?
2656Does Judge Douglas deny that fact?
2656Does Judge Douglas say it is a forgery, and was not true?
2656Does Judge Douglas say that is a forgery?
2656Does Judge Douglas say this is a forgery?
2656Does he dare to deny that?
2656Does he deny that the provision which Trumbull reads was put in that bill?
2656Does he mean that?
2656Does he mean to ignore the proposition so long and well established in law, that what you can not do directly, you can not do indirectly?
2656Does he mean to say that?
2656Does he now say that he did not make that promise?
2656Does he say it in his general sweeping charge?
2656Does he say so now?
2656Does he say that what I present here as a copy of the original Toombs bill is a forgery?
2656Does he say the quotations from his own speech are forgeries?
2656Does he say there is no such thing in the Congressional Globe?
2656Does he say this transcript from Trumbull''s speech is a forgery?
2656Does it not enter into the churches and rend them asunder?
2656Has Douglas the exclusive right, in this country, of being on all sides of all questions?
2656Has anything ever threatened the existence of this Union save and except this very institution of slavery?
2656Has it not got down as thin as the homeopathic soup that was made by boiling the shadow of a pigeon that had starved to death?
2656Has she formed a constitution that she is likely to come in under?
2656Has the voting down of that constitution put an end to all the trouble?
2656Have we ever had any peace on this slavery question?
2656Have we had any peace upon this matter springing from any other basis?
2656He also asks the question: Why did n''t Trumbull propose to amend the bill, if he thought it needed any amendment?
2656He asks, if Trumbull thought so then, what ground is there for anybody thinking otherwise now?
2656He does not, and I have the right to repeat the question,--Why Judge Douglas took it out?
2656He took it out, and although he took out the other provision preventing a submission to a vote of the people, I ask, Why did you first put it in?
2656Hear what Mr. Clay said:"And what is the foundation of this appeal to me in Indiana to liberate the slaves under my care in Kentucky?
2656How are we ever to have peace upon it?
2656How can he make out that it is a forgery?
2656How could he infer that a submission was still implied, after its express provision had been stricken from the bill?
2656How do you make this forgery when every piece of the evidence is genuine?
2656How does it do so?
2656How is it over?
2656How many times have we had danger from this question?
2656I am not discussing the question whether it is right or wrong; but how are the New Mexican and Utah laws patterns for the Nebraska Bill?
2656I ask a candid audience whether in doing thus Judge Douglas was not the assailant rather than I?
2656I ask again, is that the way to test the soundness of a doctrine?
2656I ask every sensible man if that is not so?
2656I call upon him to tell here to- day why he did not keep that promise?
2656I want to know if Buchanan has not as much right to be inconsistent as Douglas has?
2656If this is true, how do you propose to improve the condition of things by enlarging slavery, by spreading it out and making it bigger?
2656If we had no war out of it when thus placed, wherein is the ground of belief that we shall have war out of it if we return to that policy?
2656If you withhold that necessary legislation for the support of the Constitution and constitutional rights, do you not commit perjury?
2656In what way has it a tendency to prove that?
2656Is Kansas in the Union?
2656Is he to have an entire monopoly on that subject?
2656Is it a forgery?
2656Is it not so?
2656Is it the true test of the soundness of a doctrine that in some places people wo n''t let you proclaim it?
2656Is it there or not?
2656Is nobody allowed that high privilege but himself?
2656Is not that running his Popular Sovereignty down awfully?
2656Is not the slavery agitation still an open question in that Territory?
2656Is that more likely to settle it than every one of these previous attempts to settle the slavery agitation?
2656Is that the truth?
2656Is that the way to test the truth of any doctrine?
2656Is that true?
2656Is this the work of politicians?
2656Let me ask why they made provision that the source of slavery-- the African slave- trade-- should be cut off at the end of twenty years?
2656More than this, is it true that what Trumbull did can have any effect on what Douglas did?
2656Now, I ask, what is the reason Judge Douglas is so chary about coming to the exact question?
2656Now, does Judge Douglas say that is a forgery?
2656Now, if you undertake to disprove that proposition, and to show that it is erroneous, would you prove it to be false by calling Euclid a liar?
2656Now, my friends, are any of you obtuse enough to swallow that?
2656Suppose Trumbull had been in the plot with these other men, would that let Douglas out of it?
2656Suppose that were the case, does it answer Trumbull?
2656That there have been bills which never had the provision in, I do not question; but when was that provision taken out of one that it was in?
2656The question is, what did he put it in for?
2656Then I ask the original question, if each of the pieces of testimony is true, how is it possible that the whole is a falsehood?
2656Then the question is, How can Douglas call that a forgery?
2656Then what becomes of all his eloquence in behalf of the rights of States, which are assailed by no living man?
2656Then where is the place to oppose it?
2656We have sometimes had peace, but when was it?
2656What did he take that out for; and, having taken it out, what did he put this in for?
2656What disturbed the Unitarian Church in this very city two years ago?
2656What divided the great Methodist Church into two parts, North and South?
2656What does he mean when he says Judge Trumbull forges his evidence from beginning to end?
2656What has always been the evidence brought forward to prove that the Republican party is a sectional party?
2656What has ever threatened our liberty and prosperity, save and except this institution of slavery?
2656What has jarred and shaken the great American Tract Society recently, not yet splitting it, but sure to divide it in the end?
2656What has raised this constant disturbance in every Presbyterian General Assembly that meets?
2656What have I done that I have not the license of Henry Clay''s illustrious example here in doing?
2656What is a forgery?
2656What is a forgery?
2656What is it that we hold most dear amongst us?
2656What is it to be"affirmed"in the Constitution?
2656What is the evidence he produces?
2656What is the language in regard to the prohibition of the African slave- trade?
2656What is the reason he will not tell you anything about How it was made, BY WHOM it was made, or that he remembers it being made at all?
2656What other thing that you consider as a wrong do you deal with as you deal with that?
2656What was Lincoln to do?
2656When are we to have peace upon it, if it is kept in the position it now occupies?
2656When have we had any quarrels over these things?
2656When have we had perfect peace in regard to this thing which I say is an element of discord in this Union?
2656When is it likely to come to an end?
2656When that Nebraska Bill was brought forward four years ago last January, was it not for the"avowed object"of putting an end to the slavery agitation?
2656When was it as great in the country as to- day?
2656When was there ever a greater agitation in Congress than last winter?
2656Where can you find the principle of the Nebraska Bill in that Compromise?
2656Where would you have found your free State or Territory to go to?
2656Why did they make provision that in all the new territory we owned at that time slavery should be forever inhibited?
2656Why does he stand playing upon the meaning of words and quibbling around the edges of the evidence?
2656Why then do I yield support to a Fugitive Slave law?
2656Would Virginia and other Southern States have ever united in a declaration which was to be interpreted into an abolition of slavery among them?
2656Would he not at once have freed them?
2656Would it exonerate Douglas that Trumbull did n''t then perceive he was in the plot?
2656You say it is wrong; but do n''t you constantly object to anybody else saying so?
2656[ Mr. JAMES BROWN( Douglas postmaster):"What does Ford''s History say about him?"]
2656what think you of this?
26554.--"I want to know whether he stands to- day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia?"
26555.--"I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to the prohibition of the slave- trade between the different States?"
26557.--"I desire him to answer whether he is opposed to the acquisition of any new territory unless slavery is first prohibited therein?"
2655Advocated by whom?
2655Am I not making the same charge myself?
2655And now I ask why he could not have let that Compromise alone?
2655And when will we cease to have quarrels over it?
2655And why the hasty after- indorsement of the decision by the President and others?
2655Another form of his question is,"Why ca n''t we let it stand as our fathers placed it?"
2655Are you in favor of acquiring additional territory, in disregard of how such acquisition may affect the nation on the slavery question?
2655But can this question of slavery be considered as among these varieties in the institutions of the country?
2655But can we, for that reason, run ahead, and infer that he will make any particular change, of which he himself has given no intimation?
2655But does Judge Douglas''s reply amount to a satisfactory answer?
2655But has it been so with this element of slavery?
2655But if it is, how can he resist it?
2655But, Judge Douglas, why did n''t you tell the truth?
2655By whose authority, Judge Douglas?
2655By whose authority,--who do you mean to say authorized the publication of these articles?
2655By whose authority?
2655Can Judge Douglas find anybody on earth that said that anybody else should form a constitution for a people?
2655Can he possibly show that it is less a sacred right to buy them where they can be bought cheapest?
2655Can not the Judge be satisfied?
2655Can not the Judge perceive a distinction between a purpose and an expectation?
2655Can we safely base our action upon any such vague inference?
2655Can you, if you swear to support the Constitution, and believe that the Constitution establishes a right, clear your oath, without giving it support?
2655Could he have done it without them?
2655Did the Judge talk of trotting me down to Egypt to scare me to death?
2655Did we brave all then to falter now,--now, when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered, and belligerent?
2655Do you not violate and disregard your oath?
2655Do you think differently, Judge?
2655Does Douglas believe an effort to revive that trade is approaching?
2655Does he make it against that newspaper editor merely?
2655Does he not virtually shift his ground and say that it is not a question for the Court, but for the people?
2655Does he place his superior claim to credit on the ground that he performed a good act which was never expected of him?
2655Does he really think so?
2655Does the Judge claim that he is working on the plan of the founders of government?
2655Does the Judge regard that rule as a good one?
2655Free them all and keep them among us as underlings?
2655Free them, and make them politically and socially our equals?
2655Has not the Supreme Court decided that question?
2655Has there ever been a time when anybody said that any other than the people of a Territory itself should form a constitution?
2655Have these very matters ever produced any difficulty amongst us?
2655Have they produced any differences?
2655Have we no tendency to the latter condition?
2655Have we not always had quarrels and difficulties over it?
2655He does not use the word"conspiring,"but what other construction can you put upon it?
2655He has read from my speech in Springfield, in which I say that"a house divided against itself can not stand"Does the Judge say it can stand?
2655He says,"Why ca n''t this Union endure permanently half slave and half free?"
2655He says,"Why ca n''t you come out and make an open avowal of principles in all places alike?"
2655He smiles now, and says,"Did n''t they carry you off?"
2655How can he oppose the advances of slavery?
2655How can we best do it?
2655How has the planting of slavery in new countries always been effected?
2655How will he prove that we have ever occupied a different position in regard to the Lecompton Constitution or any principle in it?
2655How, I ask, do his friends speak out their own sentiments?
2655I appeal to you whether he did not say it was a question for the Supreme Court?
2655I ask by whose authority?
2655I ask you if you know any other living man who would make such a statement?
2655I ask, if somebody does not remember that a National Bank was declared to be constitutional?
2655I ask, is it not as good a rule for him as it is for me?
2655I repeat the question: Is not Congress itself bound to give legislative support to any right that is established in the United States Constitution?
2655I will ask my friend Casey, over there, if he would do such a thing?
2655I would like to know, then, if they wanted Chase''s amendment fixed over, why somebody else could not have offered to do it?
2655If one man says it does not mean a negro, why not another say it does not mean some other man?
2655If they wanted it amended, why did they not offer the amendment?
2655In the first place, what is necessary to make the institution national?
2655In what do our new Territories now differ in this respect from the old Colonies when slavery was first planted within them?
2655Is he going to spend his life in maintaining a principle that nobody on earth opposes?
2655Is it not to give such constitutional helps to the rights established by that Constitution as may be practically needed?
2655Is it quite certain that this betters their condition?
2655Is it the right of the people to have slavery or not have it, as they see fit, in the Territories?
2655Is not that so?
2655Is not that the fact?
2655Is not that the fact?
2655Is that what you mean?
2655Is the Judge really afraid of any such thing?
2655Is the one right any better than the other?
2655Is there any man who, while a member of Congress, would give support to the one any more than the other?
2655Is there any question but he means it was by the authority of the President and his Cabinet,--the Administration?
2655Is there any sort of question but he means to make that charge?
2655Let me ask you why many of us who are opposed to slavery upon principle give our acquiescence to a Fugitive Slave law?
2655Made by whom?
2655Not only so, but if you were to do so, how long would it take the courts to hold your votes unconstitutional and void?
2655Not only so, but is there not another fact: how came this Dred Scott decision to be made?
2655Now he seeks to dodge it, and asks,"Did n''t they carry you off?"
2655Now, I wish you to mark: What has become of that squatter sovereignty?
2655Now, how little do I look like being carried away trembling?
2655Now, on what ground would a member of Congress, who is opposed to slavery in the abstract, vote for a Fugitive law, as I would deem it my duty to do?
2655Now, who was it that did the work?
2655Now, whom does he make that charge against?
2655Or because we have a different class relative to the production of flour in this State?
2655The question was, Was it a fair emanation of the people?
2655Then what is necessary for the nationalization of slavery?
2655This being so, what is Judge Douglas going to spend his life for?
2655Was it necessary to the organization of a Territory?
2655Well, Judge, will you please tell me what you did about the bank decision?
2655Well, now, gentlemen, is not that very alarming?
2655Well, on Saturday he did make his answer; and what do you think it was?
2655Well, so much being disposed of, what is left?
2655What are the uses of decisions of courts?
2655What are your sentiments?
2655What can authorize him to draw any such inference?
2655What do those terms mean when used now?
2655What do those terms mean?
2655What do you understand by supporting the Constitution of a State, or of the United States?
2655What has now become of all his tirade about"resistance of the Supreme Court"?
2655What is fairly implied by the term Judge Douglas has used,"resistance to the decision"?
2655What is it?
2655What is it?
2655What is it?
2655What is popular sovereignty?
2655What is that opinion?
2655What is the matter of popular sovereignty?
2655What is the paragraph?
2655What is the reason that Judge Douglas is not willing I should stand upon that platform?
2655What is there in the language of that speech which expresses such purpose or bears such construction?
2655What is this charge that the Judge thinks I must have a very corrupt heart to make?
2655What next?
2655What reason does he propose?
2655What then?
2655What was it placed there for?
2655What was squatter sovereignty?
2655What were they but a clear indication that the framers of the Constitution intended and expected the ultimate extinction of that institution?
2655When that is so, how much is left of this vast matter of squatter sovereignty, I should like to know?
2655Which could have come the nearest to doing it without the other?
2655Who defeated it?
2655Who heard of any such thing because of the Ordinance of''87?
2655Who is so bold as to do it?
2655Who shall say,"I am the superior, and you are the inferior"?
2655Who, then, shall come in at this day and claim that he invented it?
2655Why declare that within twenty years the African slave trade, by which slaves are supplied, might be cut off by Congress?
2655Why did he oppose it?
2655Why did they not put it in themselves?
2655Why do we hold ourselves under obligations to pass such a law, and abide by it when it is passed?
2655Why even a Senator''s individual opinion withheld, till after the Presidential election?
2655Why is it that twenty shall be entitled to all the credit of doing that work, and the hundred none of it?
2655Why mention a State?
2655Why must he look farther than their platform when he claims himself to stand by his platform?
2655Why the delay of a reargument?
2655Why the incoming President''s advance exhortation in favor of the decision?
2655Why the outgoing President''s felicitation on the indorsement?
2655Why was the amendment, expressly declaring the right of the people, voted down?
2655Why was the court decision held up?
2655Why were all these acts?
2655Will any friend from Michigan read the article to which I allude?"
2655Will he dodge it now by alleging that I am trying to defend Mr. Buchanan against the charge?
2655Will the Judge pretend that Dred Scott was not held there without police regulations?
2655Will you not graciously allow us to do with the Dred Scott decision precisely as you did with the bank decision?
2655Will you oppose the admission of any Slave States which may be formed out of Texas or the Territories?
2655Will you vote for and advocate the repeal of the Fugitive Slave law passed at the recent session of Congress?
2655Will you vote for and support a bill abolishing slavery in the District of Columbia?
2655Will you, if elected, vote for and cordially support a bill prohibiting slavery in the Territories of the United States?
2655Would he send that out and have his men take it as the truth?
2655Would not this be the impression of every fair- minded man?
2655[ A voice: Who killed the bill?]
2655[ A voice: Why do n''t they come out on it?]
2655[ A voice:"Then do you repudiate popular sovereignty?"]
2655[ Judge DOUGLAS: Did n''t they carry you off?]
2655[ Judge DOUGLAS: What is the date of those resolutions?]
2655[ Judge DOUGLAS: Will you repeat that?
2655because of the Missouri restriction?
2655because of the numerous court decisions of that character?
2655what has become of it?
2655what is popular sovereignty?
2655when he now says the people may exclude slavery, does he not make it a question for the people?
2654How did the boat strike when she went in? 2654 Shall our rivers and harbors be improved?"
2654What about the tariff?
2654Again, is not Nebraska, while a Territory, a part of us?
2654Amend it for what?
2654And how much do you suppose was really expended for improvements during that four years?
2654And if so, where shall we set it down, and be free from the difficulty?
2654And if this fight should begin, is it likely to take a very peaceful, Union- saving turn?
2654And if we surrender the control of it, do we not surrender the right of self- government?
2654And is there any doubt that we must all lay aside our prejudices and march, shoulder to shoulder, in the great army of Freedom?
2654And now why will you ask us to deny the humanity of the slave, and estimate him as only the equal of the hog?
2654And what of sacrifice would they make?
2654And what shall we have in lieu of it?
2654And, really, what is the result of all this?
2654Are not the tendencies plain?
2654Are not these newspapers a fair index of the proportion of the votes?
2654Are we in a healthful political state?
2654Are you agreed?
2654Are you possessing houses and lands, and oxen and asses, and men- servants and maid- servants, and begetting sons and daughters?
2654Aye, how do you know he is?
2654But can he remember no other military coat- tail under which a certain other party have been sheltering for near a quarter of a century?
2654But can these men''s testimony be compared with the nice, exact, thorough experiments of our witnesses?
2654But had it any reference to the carrying of slavery into new countries?
2654But how are they in the number of their white people?
2654But how far beyond?
2654But how if she votes herself a slave State unfairly, that is, by the very means for which you say you would hang men?
2654But if at these elections their several constituencies shall clearly express their will against Nebraska, will these senators disregard their will?
2654But if it is a moral and political wrong, as all Christendom considers it to be, how can he answer to God for this attempt to spread and fortify it?
2654But if the negro is a man, is it not to that extent a total destruction of self- government to say that he too shall not govern himself?
2654But if you would like to defeat Buchanan and his gang, allow me a word with you: Does any one pretend that Fillmore can carry the vote of this State?
2654But is there any doubt as to what he will do on the prominent questions if elected?
2654But is this any more true in Congress than in a State Legislature?
2654But restore the compromise, and what then?
2654But what are they to do?
2654But where have I assailed them?
2654But who resists it?
2654By the way, Mr. Speaker, did you know I am a military hero?
2654By the way, how do"events"of the same sort come on in your family?
2654Can I send any more?
2654Can I send speeches that nobody has made?
2654Can any man doubt that, even in spite of the people''s will, slavery will triumph through violence, unless that will be made manifest and enforced?
2654Can any one doubt as to the reason of it?
2654Can not something be done even in Illinois?
2654Can they tell us General Cass''s opinion on this question?
2654Can we afford to sin any more deeply against human liberty?
2654Can we as Christian men, and strong and free ourselves, wield the sledge or hold the iron which is to manacle anew an already oppressed race?
2654Can we not come together for the future?
2654Can you believe that these floats go across the currents?
2654Can you there, any more than here, raise corn and wheat and oats without work?
2654Clay and Webster were dead before this question arose; by what authority shall our Senator say they would espouse his side of it if alive?
2654Could it be that the western district of Virginia furnished more business for a judge than the whole State of Illinois?
2654Could there be a more apt invention to bring about collision and violence on the slavery question than this Nebraska project is?
2654Did business men commonly go into an expenditure of money which could be of no account to them?
2654Did men act without motive?
2654Did they, then-- could they- establish a principle contrary to their own intention?
2654Did you ever, my friends, seriously reflect upon the speed with which we are tending downwards?
2654Do not the signs of the times point plainly the way in which we are going?
2654Do not they know where the shoe pinches?
2654Do we not own the country?
2654Do you find it in our platform, our speeches, our conventions, or anywhere?
2654Do you know who that was?
2654Do you really believe that such is our aim?
2654Do you say that such restriction of slavery would be unconstitutional, and that some of the States would not submit to its enforcement?
2654Does some one persuade you that Mr. Fillmore can carry Illinois?
2654Does the President, for this reason, propose to abolish the Presidency?
2654Each party within having numerous and determined backers without, is it not probable that the contest will come to blows and bloodshed?
2654Fellow- countrymen, Americans, South as well as North, shall we make no effort to arrest this?
2654Fifty?
2654First, then: If that country was in need of a territorial organization, could it not have had it as well without as with a repeal?
2654Five?
2654For instance, do you suppose that I should ever have got into notice if I had waited to be hunted up and pushed forward by older men?
2654For what is it that their lifelong enemy shall now make profit by assuming to defend them against me, their lifelong friend?
2654For what, then, would he have the Constitution amended?
2654Free them all, and keep them among us as underlings?
2654Free them, and make them politically and socially our equals?
2654Had the Vermont election given them any light?
2654Has he no acquaintance with the ample military coat tail of General Jackson?
2654Has not Mexico always claimed the contrary?
2654Have the enemy called in any foreign help?
2654Have you heard us assert that as our aim?
2654How are we to effect this?
2654How came my 47 to yield to Trumbull''s 5?
2654How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes be in favor of degrading classes of white people?
2654How comes this vast amount of property to be running about without owners?
2654How could I be?
2654How do boats find currents that floats can not discover?
2654How great a majority, do you think, would have been given had Kansas also been secured for slavery?
2654How is this?
2654How make a road, a canal, or clear a greatly obstructed river?
2654How then are we to make anything out of these lands with this encumbrance on them?
2654How was it that the Afton with all her power flanked over from the channel to the short pier without moving one foot ahead?
2654How would you like that?
2654How, then, can we make much out of this part of the territory?
2654I go against the repeal of the Missouri Compromise; did they ever go for it?
2654I repeat, therefore, the question: Is it not plain in what direction we are tending?
2654If I be right in this, how could we make any entirely new improvement by means of tonnage duties?
2654If by any means we omit to do this, what follows?
2654If not, who are the disunionists-- you or we?
2654If so, where is the propriety of having a Congress?
2654If that ordinance did not keep it out of Illinois, what was it that made the difference between Illinois and Missouri?
2654If the fruit of electing Mr. Clay would have been to prevent the extension of slavery, could the act of electing have been evil?
2654If there be doubt as to which of our divisions will get our candidate, is there no doubt as to which of your candidates will get your party?
2654If they had no connection, why are they always spoken of in connection?
2654If they intended to extend it in the event of acquiring additional territory, why did they not say so?
2654If this had been said among Marion''s men, Southerners though they were, what would have become of the man who said it?
2654If to- day he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him?
2654If you ca n''t now live with the land, how will you then live without it?
2654If you did not feel that it was wrong, why did you join in providing that men should be hung for it?
2654If, by any or all these matters, the repeal of the Missouri Compromise was commanded, why was not the command sooner obeyed?
2654In substance, it is this: The people say to General Taylor,"If you are elected, shall we have a national bank?"
2654In what?
2654Is it all union and harmony in your ranks?
2654Is it because there is a difference in size?
2654Is it not just to yourself that you should, in a few public speeches, state your reasons, and thus justify yourself?
2654Is it possible you do n''t understand that yet?
2654Is it quite certain that this betters their condition?
2654Is it quite safe to disregard it-- to despise it?
2654Is it to be decided by a vote of the people or a vote of the Legislature, or, indeed, by a vote of any sort?
2654Is it to be decided by the first dozen settlers who arrive there, or is it to await the arrival of a hundred?
2654Is not a certain Martin Van Buren an old horse which your own party have turned out to root?
2654Is the defence to blame for that?
2654Is the land richer?
2654Is there any difficulty in understanding this?
2654Is there any mistaking it?
2654Is there anything in the peculiar nature of the country?
2654Is there no danger to liberty itself in discarding the earliest practice and first precept of our ancient faith?
2654Is there-- can there be-- any doubt about this thing?
2654Is this the sacred right of self- government we hear vaunted so much?
2654It is being executed in the precise way which was intended from the first, else why does no Nebraska man express astonishment or condemnation?
2654It is excellent so far as it goes; but does it go far enough?
2654Like the great Juggernaut-- I think that is the name-- the great idol, it crushes everything that comes in its way, and makes a[?]
2654Mr. Clay was the leading spirit in making the Missouri Compromise; is it very credible that if now alive he would take the lead in the breaking of it?
2654Must she still be admitted, or the Union dissolved?
2654My friend from Indiana( C. B. Smith) has aptly asked,"Are you willing to trust the people?"
2654Now can there be any difficulty in understanding this?
2654Now, when the restriction is removed, what is to prevent it from going still farther?
2654Now, why is this?
2654One hundred?
2654One year after the adoption of the first State constitution, the whole number of them was-- what do you think?
2654Our country is prosperous and powerful; but could it have been quite all it has been, and is, and is to be, without Henry Clay?
2654Pray, will or may not the Know- Nothings, if they should get in power, add the word"Protestant,"making it read"all Protestant white men...?"
2654RESOLUTIONS OF SYMPATHY WITH THE CAUSE OF HUNGARIAN FREEDOM, SEPTEMBER[ 1??
2654RESOLUTIONS OF SYMPATHY WITH THE CAUSE OF HUNGARIAN FREEDOM, SEPTEMBER[ 1??
2654Shall we remove it for this reason?
2654She had a large delegation on that floor; but was she now in favor of granting lands to the new States, as she used to be?
2654Should we not stand by our neighbors who seek to better their conditions in Kansas and Nebraska?
2654So far all is easy; but how shall we determine which are the most important?
2654Some such we certainly have; have you none, gentlemen Democrats?
2654Ten?
2654The next thing I will try to prove is that the plaintiff''s(?)
2654Then I ask, is the precept"Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them"obsolete?
2654Then is not this test reliable?
2654Then, on the passage of the bill, the question came upon them, Shall we vote for preamble and bill together, or against both together?
2654They went for the Compromise of 1850; did I ever go against them?
2654They were greatly devoted to the Union; to the small measure of my ability was I ever less so?
2654This general proposition is doubtless correct; but did it apply?
2654This is but the opinion of a man; but who was that man?
2654To make sure of our object, shall we locate it nowhere, and have Congress hereafter to hold its sessions, as the loafer lodged,"in spots about"?
2654Two hundred millions?
2654Was it not her own fault that she entered wrong, so far wrong that she never got right?
2654Well, what are they?
2654What are the facts upon which this bold assertion is based?
2654What can you do in Missouri better than here?
2654What day does Butler appoint?
2654What for?
2654What good would it do?
2654What is reasonable skill and care?
2654What is that something?
2654What is the amount of the angle?
2654What is then left of us?
2654What mood were the steamboat men in when this bridge was burned?
2654What motive would tempt any set of men to go into an extensive survey of a railroad which they did not intend to make?
2654What name can I, in common decency, give to this wicked transaction?
2654What next?
2654What of that?
2654What then?
2654What use for the General Government, when there is nothing left for it to govern?
2654What would they who thus reproach us have done?
2654When the paper was brought to my house, my wife said to me,"Now are you going to take another worthless little paper?"
2654Which is preferable?
2654Who can compass it?
2654Who has, in spite of the decision, declared Dred Scott free, and resisted the authority of his master over him?
2654Who is responsible for this?
2654Who shall improve on what they did?
2654Who will inform the negro that he is free?
2654Who will take him before court to test the question of his freedom?
2654Why ask us to do for nothing what two hundred millions of dollars could not induce you to do?
2654Why ask us to do what you will not do yourselves?
2654Why did he not tell us how much was granted?
2654Why did you do this?
2654Why does everybody call them a compromise?
2654Why has he constantly called them a series of measures?
2654Why has he so spoken of them a thousand times?
2654Why in the accompanying report was such a repeal characterized as a departure from the course pursued in 1850 and its continued omission recommended?
2654Why no necessity then for repeal?
2654Why not apply it, then, upon this question?
2654Why was California kept out of the Union six or seven months, if it was not because of its connection with the other measures?
2654Why was it omitted in the original bill of 1854?
2654Why was the repeal omitted in the Nebraska Bill of 1853?
2654Why, as to improvements, magnify the evil, and stoutly refuse to see any good in them?
2654Will anybody there, any more than here, do your work for you?
2654Will not a small body and a large one float the same way under the same influence?
2654Will not the first drop of blood so shed be the real knell of the Union?
2654Will some one please tell me where is the positive law that establishes slavery in Kansas?
2654Will the disposition of the people prevent it?
2654Will they allow me, as an old Whig, to tell them, good- humoredly, that I think this is very silly?
2654Will they neither obey nor make room for those who will?
2654Will you please tell me by what right slavery exists in Texas to- day?
2654Will you?
2654Would not that have been better evidence?
2654Would that make the navigation better or worse?
2654Would you have gone out of the House-- skulked the vote?
2654Would you have voted what you felt and knew to be a lie?
2654Would you venture to so consider them had they been committed by any nation on earth against the humblest of our people?
2654and is he not rooting a little to your discomfort about now?
2654no bickerings?
2654no divisions?
2654of no application?
2654of no force?
2654or how remove the encumbrance?
2654thou awe- inspiring prince That keepst the world in fear, Why dost thou tear more blest ones hence, And leave him lingering here?
26581.27 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL KELLEY, Harper''s Ferry: Are the forces at Winchester and Martinsburg making any effort to get to you?
26582.30 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL BURNSIDE, Falmouth, Virginia: Any further news?
26582.30 p.m. MAJOR- GENERAL McCLELLAN What news from direction of Manassas Junction?
26582.40 P. M. MAJOR- GENERAL BURNSIDE, Falmouth, Virginia: Any news from General Pope?
26583.30 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL HOOKER: How does it look now?
26584 P.M. HIS EXCELLENCY GOVERNOR SEYMOUR, Albany, N.Y.: By what day may I expect your communication to reach me?
26584.35 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL BUTTERFIELD: Where is General Hooker?
26585 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL McCLELLAN, Rockville, Maryland: How does it look now?
26585.45 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL Dix, Fort Monroe, Va.: What iron- clads, if any, have gone out of Hampton Roads within the last two days?
26587.20 P.M. GENERAL BUELL: What degree of certainty have you that Bragg, with his command, is not now in the valley of the Shenandoah, Virginia?
26589 A.M. MAJOR- GENERAL MEADE: What news this morning?
2658: How is your health now?
2658: How many rebel prisoners captured within Maryland and Pennsylvania have reached Baltimore within this month of July?
2658A. K. McCLURE, Philadelphia: Do we gain anything by opening one leak to stop another?
2658Also, what impression have you as to intrenched works for you to contend with in front of Richmond?
2658And if any, what?
2658And if so what is it?
2658And if so what was his offense, and when is he to be executed?
2658And in any event, can not the North decide for itself whether to receive them?
2658And is it not needed whenever it helps us and hurts the enemy?
2658And suppose they could be induced by a proclamation of freedom from me to throw themselves upon us, what should we do with them?
2658And why may we not continue that ratio far beyond that period?
2658And why, he asked, should the people of your race be colonized, and where?
2658And yet have not more been furnished you since then than your entire present stock?
2658Are the forces still moving north through the gap at Front Royal and between you and there?
2658Are they not already in the land?
2658Are you anxious about any part except the city and vicinity?
2658Are you for it?
2658Are you for it?
2658Are you not over- cautious when you assume that you can not do what the enemy is constantly doing?
2658As commander of this department, should you not be here?
2658As you have but 2500 men at Harper''s Ferry, where are the rest which were in that vicinity and which we have sent forward?
2658August 27, 1862 4.30 p.m. MAJOR- GENERAL BURNSIDE, Falmouth, Virginia: Do you hear anything from Pope?
2658Brown, convicted of mutinous conduct and sentenced to death?
2658But how can we obtain it?
2658But what comparison, in numbers have such bands ever borne to the insurgent sympathizers even in many of the loyal States?
2658But who is to be the judge of hearts, or of"heart in it"?
2658But why should emancipation South send the free people North?
2658By arithmetic, how many days will it take him to do it?
2658COLONEL HAUPT Alexandria, Virginia: What news?
2658Can I have fifty?
2658Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
2658Can he do it?
2658Can not the enemy ford the river?
2658Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
2658Can we, can they, by any other means so certainly or so speedily assure these vital objects?
2658Can you get near enough to throw shells into the city?
2658Can you not do this almost as well as not while you are building the Chickahominy bridges?
2658Can you not pursue the retreating enemy, and relieve Cumberland Gap?
2658Can you not, and will you not, have a full conference with General Halleck?
2658Can you not?
2658Change positions with the enemy, and think you not he would break your communication with Richmond within the next twenty- four hours?
2658Could I get a hundred tolerably intelligent men, with their wives and children, and able to"cut their own fodder,"so to speak?
2658Could he be of service to you or to Tennessee in any capacity in which I could send him?
2658Could the one in any way greatly disturb the seven?
2658Could you give me the facts which prompted you to telegraph?
2658Did he know what he said, or did he say it without knowing it?
2658Did you receive a short letter from me dated the 13th of July?
2658Did you receive my despatch of 12th pardoning John Murphy?
2658Do we gain anything by quieting one merely to open another, and probably a larger one?
2658Do you know anything about it?
2658Do you know him?
2658Do you know where Longstreet is?
2658Do you not consume supplies as fast as you get them forward?
2658Do you not, my good friend, perceive that what you ask is simply to put you in command in the West?
2658Do you think differently?
2658Do you wish to say anything on the subject?
2658Do you?
2658Does Colonel Devon mean that sound of firing was heard in direction of Warrenton, as stated, or in direction of Warrenton Junction?
2658Does it appear otherwise to you?
2658Does preparation advance at all?
2658EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 29, 1863 MAJOR- GENERAL DIx, Fort Monroe, Va.: Do Richmond papers have anything from Vicksburg?
2658GENERAL BOYLE, Louisville, Kentucky: What force, and what the numbers of it, which General Nelson had in the engagement near Richmond yesterday?
2658GENERAL BOYLE, Louisville, Kentucky: Where is General Bragg?
2658GENERAL KETCHUM, Springfield, Illinois: How many regiments are there in Illinois, ready for service but for want of arms?
2658GENERAL SAXTON, Harper''s Ferry: If Banks reaches Martinsburg, is he any the better for it?
2658GENERAL TYLER, Martinsburg: If you are besieged, how do you despatch me?
2658GENERAL TYLER, Martinsburg: Is Milroy invested so that he can not fall back to Harper''s Ferry?
2658GENERAL WRIGHT, Cincinnati, Ohio: Do you know to any certainty where General Bragg is?
2658GOVERNOR CURTIN, Harrisburg: What do you hear from General McClellan''s army?
2658Has it more waste surface by mountains, rivers, lakes, deserts, or other causes?
2658Have any of them been cut off?
2658Have not all been sent to deceive?
2658Have they been sent there by any order, and if so, for what reason?
2658Have you a place you would like to put him in?
2658Have you already in your mind a plan wholly or partially formed?
2658Have you any more perfect knowledge of this than I have?
2658Have you any news through Richmond papers or otherwise?
2658Have you anything from Memphis or other parts of the Mississippi River?
2658Have you anything?
2658Have you more animals to- day than you had at the battle of Stone''s River?
2658Have you received the orders, and will you act upon them?
2658Have you sent anything to meet him and assist him at Martinsburg?
2658How can they be got to you, and how can they be prevented from getting away in such numbers for the future?
2658How can we feed and care for such a multitude?
2658How certain is your information about Bragg being in the valley of the Shenandoah?
2658How did this happen?
2658How do you learn that the rebel forces at Manassas are large and commanded by several of their best generals?
2658How does it all sum up?
2658How many arms have you there ready for distribution?
2658How near to you?
2658I wish to see you at once will you come?
2658If not recruited and rested then, when could they ever be?
2658If preorganization was against them then, why not do this now that the United States army is present to protect them?
2658If so, what news?
2658If the Governor of New Jersey shall furnish any new regiments, might not they be put into such an expedition?
2658If they could hold out a few days, could you help them?
2658If this be true would you like to have the shells sent to you?
2658If this is so, how happened it that Fremont fairly fought and routed him on the 8th?
2658If, then, for a common object this property is to be sacrificed, is it not just that it be done at a common charge?
2658If, then, we are at some time to be as populous as Europe, how soon?
2658In the name of all that is reasonable, how long does it take to pay a couple of regiments?
2658In what way can that compromise be used to keep Lee''s army out of Pennsylvania?
2658Is he coming toward you or going farther off?
2658Is it doubted that it would restore the national authority and national prosperity and perpetuate both indefinitely?
2658Is it doubted that we here-- Congress and executive-- can secure its adoption?
2658Is it doubted, then, that the plan I propose, if adopted, would shorten the war, and thus lessen its expenditure of money and of blood?
2658Is it inferior to Europe in any natural advantage?
2658Is it less fertile?
2658Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
2658Is it true, then, that colored people can displace any more white labor by being free than by remaining slaves?
2658Is not this so?
2658Is that so?
2658Is there a single court, or magistrate or individual that would be influenced by it there?
2658Is there or has there been anything to hinder his coming directly to you by water from Alexandria?
2658Is there, has there ever been, any question that by the law of war, property, both of enemies and friends, may be taken when needed?
2658It is not"Can any of us imagine better?"
2658J. K. DuBois, Springfield, Ill.: General Rosecrans respectfully urges the appointment of William P. Caslin as a brigadier- general, What say you?
2658KEY: I am informed that, in answer to the question,"Why was not the rebel army bagged immediately after the battle near Sharpsburg?"
2658MAJOR VAN VLIET, New York: Have you any idea what the news is in the despatch of General Banks to General Halleck?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL COUCH, Harrisburg, Pa.: Have you any reports of the enemy moving into Pennsylvania?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL CURTIS: Could the civil authority be reintroduced into Missouri in lieu of the military to any extent, with advantage and safety?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL DIX, Fort Monroe, Va.: Do Richmond papers of 6th say nothing about Vicksburg, or if anything, what?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL DIX: Do the Richmond papers have anything about Grand Gulf or Vicksburg?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL Dix, Fort Monroe: Is it not probable that the enemy has abandoned the line between White House and McClellan''s rear?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL GEORGE B. McCLELLAN: Can you not cut the Alula Creek railroad?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL GRANT, Vicksburg, via Memphis: Are you in communication with General Banks?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL HURLBUT, Memphis: What news have you?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL MEADE, Warrenton, Va.: Is Albert Jones of Company K, Third Maryland Volunteers, to be shot on Friday next?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL McCLELLAN, Rockville, Maryland: How does it look now?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL McCLELLAN: What of F.J. Porter''s expedition?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL McDOWELL: What is the strength of your force now actually with you?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL ROSECRANS, Murfreesborough, Tenn.: Have you anything from Grant?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL SLOCUM, Leesburg, Va.: Was William Gruvier, Company A, Forty- sixth, Pennsylvania, one of the men executed as a deserter last Friday?
2658MAJOR- GENERAL Wool, Baltimore: What about Harper''s Ferry?
2658MRS. A. LINCOLN, Fifth Avenue House, New York:--Did you receive my despatch of yesterday?
2658MY DEAR SIR:--What think you of forming a reserve cavalry corps of, say, 6000 for the Army of the Potomac?
2658Major Turner says:"As I remember it, the conversation was:''Why did we not bag them after the battle of Sharpsburg?''
2658May I not hope that you and he will attempt this?
2658May he not be in Virginia?
2658Might not such a corps be constituted from the cavalry of Sigel''s and Slocum''s corps, with scraps we could pick up here and there?
2658Mrs. ELIZABETH J. GRIMSLEY, Springfield, Ill.: Is your John ready to enter the naval school?
2658Now, then, tell me, if you please, what possible result of good would follow the issuing of such a proclamation as you desire?
2658Object whatsoever is possible, still the question recurs,"Can we do better?"
2658Or is the account that he did fight and rout him false and fabricated?
2658Or would you prosecute it in future with elder- stalk squirts charged with rose water?
2658PRESIDENT LINCOLN:[to the corps commanders] In your present encampment what is the present and prospective condition as to health?
2658PRESIDENT''S ROOM, WHITE HOUSE, WASHINGTON, July[ 15?]
2658R. P. Crawford to be restored to his office?
2658ROBERT T. LINCOLN: New York, Fifth Avenue Hotel: Why do I hear no more of you?
2658SIR:--Can we not renew the effort to organize a force to go to western Texas?
2658SMITH, Esq., Springfield, Ill.: Why not name him for the general you fancy most?
2658SPEECH TO THE 12TH INDIANA REGIMENT, MAY[ 15?]
2658Secondly, will not a movement of our army be a relief to the cavalry, compelling the enemy to concentrate instead of foraging in squads everywhere?
2658Shall they be withdrawn from Banks, or Grant, or Steele, or Rosecrans?
2658Should not the remainder of your forces, except sufficient to hold the point at Fredericksburg, move this way-- to Manassas Junction or Alexandria?
2658Should the enrolled militia then have been broken up and General Herron kept from Grant to police Missouri?
2658Should you not claim to be at least his equal in prowess, and act upon the claim?
2658Some of you profess to think its retraction would operate favorably for the Union, why better after the retraction than before the issue?
2658Supposing he is loyal, can any of his requests be granted, and if any, which of them?
2658THE PRESIDENT: If you desired could you remove the army safely?
2658THE PRESIDENT: What amount of force have you now?
2658THE PRESIDENT: What is likely to be your condition as to health in this camp?
2658THE PRESIDENT: Where is the enemy now?
2658THE PRESIDENT:[ to the corps commanders] If it were desired to get the army away, could it be safely effected?
2658THE PRESIDENT:[ to the corps commanders] Is the army secure in its present position?
2658THE PRESIDENT:[ to the corps commanders] What is the aggregate of your killed, wounded, and missing from the attack on the 26th ultimo till now?
2658THE PRESIDENT:[ to the corps commanders] Where and in what condition do you believe the enemy to be now?
2658TO GENERAL BURNSIDE OR GENERAL PARKE: What news about arrival of troops?
2658The question is, if the colored people are persuaded to go anywhere, why not there?
2658The question now practically in dispute is: Can Governor Gamble make a vacancy by removing an officer or accepting a resignation?
2658The question occurs, Can the thing be done at all?
2658Upon this probability what is to be done?
2658WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, October 24[ 25?
2658WASHINGTON CITY, August 27, 1862 4 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL McCLELLAN, Alexandria, Virginia: What news from the front?
2658WASHINGTON CITY, D.C., SEPTEMBER 12, 1862 MAJOR- GENERAL McCLELLAN, Clarksburg, Maryland: How does it look now?
2658WASHINGTON, May 27, 1863.11 P.M. MAJOR- GENERAL HOOKER: Have you Richmond papers of this morning?
2658Was this all wrong?
2658What can we do to expedite matters?
2658What could I do?
2658What do you desire about it?
2658What do you know of the enemy?
2658What do you know on the subject?
2658What does it mean?
2658What does this mean?
2658What from Lake Providence?
2658What from Vicksburg?
2658What from Yazoo Pass?
2658What generally?
2658What generally?
2658What good would a proclamation of emancipation from me do, especially as we are now situated?
2658What is General Gilbert''s opinion?
2658What is the amount of it?
2658What is the latest you have?
2658What lack you from us?
2658What next?
2658What say you?
2658What think you of it?
2658What would you do in my position?
2658When can you reach here?
2658Whence shall they come?
2658Where do you understand Buell to be, and what is he doing?
2658Where is Forrest''s headquarters?
2658Where is Sedgwick Where is Stoneman?
2658Where is the enemy which you dread in Louisville?
2658Why can you not reach there before him, unless you admit that he is more than your equal on a march?
2658Why did they allow the ordinance to go into effect?
2658Why did they not assert themselves?
2658Why did they not hold popular meetings and have a convention of their own to express and enforce the true sentiment of the State?
2658Why did you not leave before being besieged?
2658Why may not our country at some time average as many?
2658Why should they do anything for us if we will do nothing for them?
2658Why should they leave this country?
2658Why stand passive and allow themselves to be trodden down by minority?
2658Will liberation make them any more numerous?
2658Will not the enemy cut him from thence to Harper''s Ferry?
2658Will not the good people respond to a united and earnest appeal from us?
2658Will you not embrace it?
2658Will you not soon visit Washington again?
2658Will you pardon me for asking what the horses of your army have done since the battle of Antietam that fatigues anything?
2658Will you please get in communication with him, and have a full conference with him before you leave for here?
2658Will you please look into the case and restore the old man to his home if the public interest will admit?
2658Would my word free the slaves, when I can not even enforce the Constitution in the rebel States?
2658Would not Stoneman better move up and see about it?
2658Would not the doing of this be your best mode of counteracting his raid on your communications?
2658Would you advise that the authority be given him?
2658Would you deal lighter blows rather than heavier ones?
2658Would you drop the war where it is?
2658Would you give up the contest, leaving any available means unapplied?
2658You ask,"Why is it that the North with her great armies so often is found with inferiority of numbers face to face with the armies of the South?"
2658but"Can we all do better?"
2657That is so,one of them says; I wonder if he is a Kentuckian?
2657?, 1858 As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.
2657Again, in its political aspect, does anything in any way endanger the perpetuity of this Union but that single thing, slavery?
2657And how much would it avail you, if you could, by the use of John Brown, Helper''s Book, and the like, break up the Republican organization?
2657And if I do my duty and do right, you will sustain me, will you not?
2657And if so treated and driven out, at what point of time would there ever be ten thousand?
2657And now, my friends, have I said enough?
2657And should any one in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept?
2657And then what about Carl Schurz; or, in other words, what about our German friends?
2657And where will it end?"
2657And why?
2657Are General Buell and yourself in concert?
2657Are you going to split the Ohio down through, and push your half off a piece?
2657Are you ready to get back the trade on those terms?
2657Are you strong enough-- are you strong enough even with my help-- to set your foot upon the necks of Sumner, Heintzelman, and Keyes all at once?
2657August?
2657But are not the people of the Territories detailed from the States?
2657But do I think so meanly of you as to suppose that that earnestness is about me personally?
2657But how?
2657But those who say they hate slavery, and are opposed to it, but yet act with the Democratic party-- where are they?
2657But what is the controlling of it"as other property"?
2657But what was to be done after that time?
2657But what, at last, is this proposition?
2657By the way, in what consists the special sacredness of a State?
2657Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
2657Can any of you tell any reason why it should not have come into the Union at once?
2657Can anybody doubt the reason of the difference?
2657Can they exclude it then?
2657Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
2657Can we cast our votes with their view, and against our own?
2657Can we cast our votes with their view, and against our own?
2657Can you not elect him to the Legislature?
2657Can you not see me at Monticello on the 6th of September?
2657Can you point out the difference?
2657Can you, without much inconvenience, meet me at Chicago?
2657Could Washington himself speak, would he cast the blame of that sectionalism upon us, who sustain his policy, or upon you, who repudiate it?
2657Could Washington himself speak, would he cast the blame of that sectionalism upon us, who sustain his policy, or upon you, who repudiate it?
2657Could you not set up Lizzie and beat them all?
2657DEAR SIR:--How is this?
2657DEAR SIR:--What think you of sending ministers at once as follows: Dayton to England; Fremont to France; Clay to Spain; Corwin to Mexico?
2657December[?
2657Did Judge Douglas invent this?
2657Did any other thing ever cause a moment''s fear?
2657Did the angry debates which took place at Washington during the last season of Congress lead you to suppose that the slavery agitation was settled?
2657Did we notify them of this sage view of ours when we borrowed their money?
2657Did you not find your country free when you came to decide that Ohio should be a free State?
2657Do any of you know of one?
2657Do n''t foreign nations interfere with the slave trade?
2657Do n''t you see that they cut off competition?
2657Do the Republicans declare against the Union?
2657Do the commanders of corps disobey your orders in anything?
2657Do they not have their fugitive slaves returned now as ever?
2657Do you accept the challenge?
2657Do you accept the challenge?
2657Do you receive the answers?
2657Do you see anything to the contrary?
2657Do you, any of you, know one single Democrat that showed sorrow over that result?
2657Does not your plan involve a greatly larger expenditure of time and money than mine?
2657GENERAL BUELL: Have arms gone forward for East Tennessee?
2657Gentlemen, is that a true view of the case?
2657Have they not a position as citizens of this common country, and have we any power to change that position?
2657Have they not all their rights now as they ever have had?
2657Have they not the same Constitution that they have lived under for seventy- odd years?
2657Have you ever got in the way of consulting with McKinley in political matters?
2657Have you found it necessary to put any such provision in your law?
2657Have you received these messages?
2657He has never denounced Mr. Hickman: why?
2657How can this discrepancy of 23,000 be accounted for?
2657How many do you suppose there were?
2657I ask any honest Democrat if the small, the local, and the trivial and temporary question is not, Who shall be governor?
2657I do not think that this counting is constitutionally essential to the election, but how are we to proceed in the absence of it?
2657I want to know, now, when that thing takes place, what do you mean to do?
2657If any one comes that wants slavery, must they not say,"I do n''t care whether freedom or slavery be voted up or voted down"?
2657If the majority should not rule, who would be the judge?
2657If the two houses refuse to meet at all, or meet without a quorum of each, where shall we be?
2657If there is no difference between them, why not make the Territories States at once?
2657If they were not driven out, but remained there as trespassers upon the public land in violation of the law, can they establish slavery there?
2657If this feeling of indifference this absence of moral sense about the question prevails in the States, will it not be carried into the Territories?
2657In case of disaster, would not a retreat be more difficult by your plan than mine?
2657In establishing a basis of representation they say"all other persons,"when they mean to say slaves-- why did they not use the shortest phrase?
2657In fact, would it not be less valuable in this, that it would break no great line of the enemy''s communications, while mine would?
2657In our present differences is either party without faith of being in the right?
2657In the midst of a bombardment at Fort Donelson, why could not a gunboat run up and destroy the bridge at Clarksville?
2657In view of our moral, social, and political responsibilities, can we do this?
2657In view of our moral, social, and political responsibilities, can we do this?
2657In view of this, might it not be safest for us to cross the Occoquan at Coichester, rather than at the village of Occoquan?
2657Is anything to be done?
2657Is controlling it as other property the same thing as destroying it, or driving it away?
2657Is it just either that creditors shall go unpaid or the remaining States pay the whole?
2657Is it just that she shall leave and pay no part of this herself?
2657Is it just that she shall now be off without consent or without making any return?
2657Is it just that they shall go off without leave and without refunding?
2657Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against a new and untried?
2657Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?
2657Is it not the sacred right of the man who do n''t go there equally to buy slaves in Africa, if he wants them?
2657Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
2657Is it true, then, that any right, plainly written in the Constitution, has been denied?
2657Is not that a falsehood?
2657Is not this change wrought in your minds a very important change?
2657Is there a Democrat here who does not deny that the Declaration applies to the negro?
2657Is there any better or equal hope in the world?
2657Is there anything else that you think wrong that you are not willing to deal with as wrong?
2657Is there one in Ohio but declares his firm belief that the Declaration of Independence did not mean negroes at all?
2657Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose a new Union as to produce harmony only, and prevent renewed secession?
2657Is there, then, anything in the constitution or laws of Ohio against raising sugar- cane?
2657Is this quite just for creditors?
2657It forces us to ask: Is there in all republics this inherent and fatal weakness?
2657It is necessary for this squatter sovereignty, but is it true?
2657It simply leaves the inquiry: What was the understanding those fathers had of the question mentioned?
2657Kentucky is entirely covered with slavery; Ohio is entirely free from it: What made that difference?
2657Let us inquire what Judge Douglas really invented when he introduced the Nebraska Bill?
2657MEMORANDUM FOR A PLAN OF CAMPAIGN[ OCTOBER 1?]
2657MY DEAR SIR:--Assuming it to be possible to now provision Fort Sumter, under all the circumstances is it wise to attempt it?
2657MY DEAR SIR:--Why can not Colonel Small''s Philadelphia regiment be received?
2657May Congress prohibit slavery in the Territories?
2657Must Congress protect slavery in the Territories?
2657Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak to maintain its own existence?
2657No?
2657Now we claim that we are the only true Union men, and we put to them this one proposition: Whatever endangers this Union, save and except slavery?
2657Now, I would like to know what is to be done with the nine thousand?
2657Now, my friends, can the country be saved upon that basis?
2657Now, tell me, is this not mere impatience?
2657Now, what is judge Douglas''s popular sovereignty?
2657Of what tendency is that change?
2657One party to a contract may violate it-- break it, so to speak; but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?
2657Or are you going to keep it right alongside of us outrageous fellows?
2657Or shall I decide for myself?
2657Pray what was it that made you free?
2657SPRINGFIELD, May 17?
2657SUPPORT OF THE FUGITIVE SLAVE CLAUSE MEMORANDUM December[ 22?
2657Shall fugitives from labor be surrendered by national or by State authority?
2657Shall this class of legislation just now beginning with us be general or special?
2657Shall we put the card through, and arrange the rest afterward?
2657So they may-- so may individuals; and which-- the Legislature or the courts-- is best suited to try the question of fraud in either case?
2657Suppose the enemy in force shall dispute the crossing of the Occoquan, what?
2657Suppose the enemy should attack us in force before we reach the Occoquan, what?
2657The dissenter laid a guinea over the word and asked,"Do you see it now?"
2657The fact is substantially true; but does it prove the issue?
2657The fact is substantially true; but does it prove the issue?
2657The only dispute on both sides is,"What are their rights?"
2657The question recurs, what will satisfy them?
2657The question recurs, what will satisfy them?
2657The questions are sometimes asked"What is all this fuss that is being made about negroes?
2657Then he showed him a single word--"Can you see that?"
2657Then what was it that the"Little Giant"invented?
2657These natural and apparently adequate means all failing, what will convince them?
2657These natural and apparently adequate means all failing, what will convince them?
2657This is a practical and very serious question to you?
2657To state the question more directly, are all the laws but one to go unexecuted, and the government itself go to pieces lest that one be violated?
2657To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak?
2657VERSE TO"LINNIE"September 30,?
2657Was it climate?
2657Was it soil?
2657Was it the right of emigrants to Kansas and Nebraska to govern themselves, and a lot of"niggers,"too, if they wanted them?
2657Was not this the origin of popular sovereignty as applied to the American people?
2657We deny it; and what is your proof''?
2657Well, then, I want to know what you are going to do with your half of it?
2657What constitutes the bulwark of our own liberty and independence?
2657What do they really want, other than that slavery, being in the Territories, shall be controlled as other property?
2657What do you want more than anything else?
2657What does it amount to?
2657What does it depend upon?
2657What does that mean?
2657What induced the Southampton insurrection, twenty- eight years ago, in which, at least, three times as many lives were lost as at Harper''s Ferry?
2657What is Webb about?
2657What is conservatism?
2657What is conservatism?
2657What is indispensable to you?
2657What is invasion?
2657What is it to exclude?
2657What is it?
2657What is that reason?
2657What is the Dred Scott decision?
2657What is the frame of Government under which we live?
2657What is the question which, according to the text, those fathers understood"just as well, and even better than we do now"?
2657What is the reason that Kansas was not fit to come into the Union when it was organized into a Territory, in Judge Douglas''s view?
2657What is the true condition of the laborer?
2657What is there now to warrant the condition of affairs presented by our friends over the river?
2657What is your Senator Martin saying and doing?
2657What is"sovereignty"in the political sense of the term?
2657What kept you free?
2657What mysterious right to play tyrant is conferred on a district of country, with its people, by merely calling it a State?
2657What objection could be made to him?
2657What other foreign trade did they treat in that way?
2657What say you?
2657What thinks Grimes about it?
2657What was it?
2657What word of compromise was there about it?
2657What would that other channel probably be?
2657What, then, is coercion?
2657What, then, is the matter with them?
2657What-- is needed absolutely?
2657When he moves on Bowling Green, what hinders it being reinforced from Columbus?
2657Where is such a judge to be found?
2657Wherein is a victory more certain by your plan than mine?
2657Wherein is a victory more valuable by your plan than mine?
2657Whether that was his object or not I will not stop to discuss, but at all events some kind of a policy was initiated; and what has been the result?
2657Which of the three powers named by Great Britain as an arbiter shall be chosen by the United States?"
2657Which of them do the New England delegation prefer?
2657Why all these complaints?
2657Why all this excitement?
2657Why are you so careful, so tender, of this one wrong and no other?
2657Why did n''t they do it?
2657Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?
2657Why this deliberate pressing out of view the rights of men and the authority of the people?
2657Why was this?
2657Why?
2657Why?
2657Why?
2657Why?
2657Will it do for me to go on and justify the declaration that Trumbull and I have divided out all the offices among our relatives?
2657Will it satisfy them if, in the future, we have nothing to do with invasions and, insurrections?
2657Will it satisfy them, in the future, if we have nothing to do with invasions and insurrections?
2657Will not every man say,"I do n''t care, it is nothing to me"?
2657Will they be satisfied if the Territories be unconditionally surrendered to them?
2657Will they be satisfied if the Territories be unconditionally surrendered to them?
2657Will you give him credit for that?
2657Will you hazard so desperate a step while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you fly from have no real existence?
2657Will you make war upon us and kill us all?
2657Will you not say that in this matter he is more wisely for you than you are for yourselves?
2657Will you please bring with you to- day the message from the War Department, with General Scott''s note upon it, which we had here yesterday?
2657Will you, if in your power, procure them and forward them to me by express?
2657Will you, while the certain ills you fly to are greater than all the real ones you fly from-- will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake?
2657Would an exchange of name be an exchange of rights?
2657Would it be far wrong to define it as"a political community without a political superior"?
2657Would it be just or generous?
2657Would that be right?
2657Would the marching of an army into South Carolina, without the consent of her people, and with hostile intent toward them, be invasion?
2657Would the number of John Browns be lessened or enlarged by the operation?
2657Would they have done this if they had not thought slavery wrong?
2657Would you have that question reduced to its former proportions?
2657Yet how long before it was unsettled again?
2657You can not escape this conclusion; and yet, are you willing to abide by it?
2657You can not escape this conclusion; and yet, are you willing to abide by it?
2657You produce your proof; and what is it?
2657You produce your proof; and what is it?
2657while the durable, the important, and the mischievous one is, Shall this soil be planted with slavery?
14721Might it not be well for me,queried the officer,"to set this matter right in a letter to some paper, stating the facts as they actually transpired?"
14721Must a government, of necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak to maintain its own existence?
14721That is so,one of them says; I wonder if he is a Kentuckian?
14721... Are you strong enough-- are you strong enough, even with my help-- to set your foot upon the necks of Sumner, Heintzelman, and Keyes, all at once?
14721And how much would it avail you if you could, by the use of John Brown, Helper''s book, and the like, break up the Republican organization?
14721And is it not needed whenever taking it helps us or hurts the enemy?
14721And is there any doubt that we must all lay aside our prejudices and march, shoulder to shoulder, in the great army of Freedom?
14721And now I ask why he could not have left that compromise alone?
14721And now why will you ask us to deny the humanity of the slave, and estimate him as only the equal of the hog?
14721And should any one in any case be content that his oath shall go unkept on a merely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept?
14721And suppose they could be induced by a proclamation of freedom from me to throw themselves upon us, what should we do with them?
14721And what shall we have in lieu of it?
14721And when will we cease to have quarrels over it?
14721And why the hasty after- indorsement of the decision by the President and others?
14721Another form of his question is,"Why ca n''t we let it stand as our fathers placed it?"
14721Are not the tendencies plain?
14721Are we in a healthful political state?
14721Are you for it?
14721Are you for it?
14721Are you going to split the Ohio down through, and push your half off a piece?
14721As to the whiskers, having never worn any, do you not think people would call it a piece of silly affectation if I were to begin it now?
14721At what point shall we expect the approach of danger?
14721At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected?
14721But can this question of slavery be considered as among these varieties in the institutions of the country?
14721But can we, for that reason, run ahead, and infer that he will make any particular change, of which he himself has given no intimation?
14721But does not this question make a disturbance outside of political circles?
14721But has it been so with this element of slavery?
14721But how can we attain it?
14721But how if she votes herself a slave State unfairly; that is, by the very means for which you say you would hang men?
14721But if it is a moral and political wrong, as all Christendom considers it to be, how can he answer to God for this attempt to spread and fortify it?
14721But if it is, how can he resist it?
14721But if the negro is a man, is it not to that extent a total destruction of self- government to say that he, too, shall not govern himself?
14721But let me ask Judge Douglas how he is going to get the people to do that?
14721But what could I do?
14721But where will you be placed if you reindorse Judge Douglas?
14721But which system shall be adopted?
14721But who resists it?
14721By the way, in what consists the special sacredness of a State?
14721By what means shall we fortify against it?
14721Can Judge Douglas find anybody on earth that said that anybody else should form a constitution for a people?...
14721Can Louisiana be brought into proper practical relation with the Union sooner by sustaining or by discarding her new State government?
14721Can aliens make treaties easier than friends can make laws?
14721Can any man doubt that, even in spite of the people''s will, slavery will triumph through violence, unless that will be made manifest and enforced?
14721Can he possibly show that it is a less sacred right to buy them where they can be bought cheapest?
14721Can treaties be more faithfully enforced between aliens than laws can among friends?
14721Can we afford to sin any more deeply against human liberty?
14721Can we as Christian men, and strong and free ourselves, wield the sledge or hold the iron which is to manacle anew an already oppressed race?
14721Can we safely base our action upon any such vague inference?
14721Can you there, any more than here, raise corn and wheat and oats without work?
14721Can you, if you swear to support the Constitution and believe that the Constitution establishes a right, clear your oath without giving it support?
14721Could Washington himself speak, would he cast the blame of that sectionalism upon us, who sustain his policy, or upon you, who repudiate it?
14721Could he have done it without them?
14721Did we brave all then to falter now?--now, when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered, and belligerent?
14721Did we notify them of this sage view of ours when we borrowed their money?
14721Did you ever, my friends, seriously reflect upon the speed with which we are tending downward?
14721Do not the signs of the times point plainly the way in which we are going?
14721Do the commanders of corps disobey your orders in anything?
14721Do you accept the challenge?
14721Do you not constantly argue that this is not the right place to oppose it?
14721Do you not violate and disregard your oath?
14721Do you think differently?
14721Does Douglas believe an effort to revive that trade is approaching?
14721Does he not virtually shift his ground and say that it is not a question for the court, but for the people?
14721Does he really think so?
14721Does it appear otherwise to you?
14721Does it not enter into the churches and rend them asunder?
14721Does the Judge claim that he is working on the plan of the founders of the government?
14721Does the Judge say it can stand?
14721Dr. Ross has a slave named Sambo, and the question is,"Is it the will of God that Sambo shall remain a slave, or be set free?"
14721For instance, do you suppose that I should ever have got into notice if I had waited to be hunted up and pushed forward by older men?
14721Free them all, and keep them among us as underlings?
14721Free them, and make them politically and socially our equals?
14721Has anything ever threatened the existence of this Union save and except this very institution of slavery?
14721Has not the Supreme Court decided that question?
14721Has she formed a constitution that she is likely to come in under?
14721Has there ever been a time when anybody said that any other than the people of a Territory itself should form a constitution?
14721Have these very matters ever produced any difficulty amongst us?
14721Have they produced any differences?
14721Have we ever had any peace on this slavery question?
14721Have we no tendency to the latter condition?
14721Have we not always had quarrels and difficulties over it?
14721He says,"Why ca n''t this Union endure permanently half slave and half free?"
14721How are we ever to have peace upon it?
14721How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes be in favour of degrading classes of white people?
14721How can he oppose the advances of slavery?
14721How can we best do it?
14721How can we feed and care for such a multitude?
14721How comes it that a man of first- rate powers was deficient in qualities appertaining to his own profession which men less remarkable have possessed?
14721How comes this vast amount of property to be running about without owners?
14721How could I be?
14721How great a majority, do you think, would have been given had Kansas also been secured for slavery?
14721How is it over?
14721How is this?
14721How many times have we had danger from this question?
14721How would you like that?
14721How, then, shall we perform it?
14721I appeal to you whether he did not say it was a question for the Supreme Court?
14721I ask if somebody does not remember that a national bank was declared to be constitutional?
14721I ask you if it is not a false philosophy?
14721I repeat the question, is not Congress itself bound to give legislative support to any right that is established in the United States Constitution?
14721I repeat, therefore, the question, Is it not plain in what direction we are tending?
14721I submit to you now, whether the new state of the case has not induced the Judge to sheer away from his original ground?
14721I want to know, now, when that thing takes place, what do you mean to do?
14721If one man says it does not mean a negro, why not another say it does not mean some other man?
14721If this is true, how do you propose to improve the condition of things by enlarging slavery,--by spreading it out and making it bigger?
14721If you ca n''t now live with the land, how will you then live without it?
14721If you did not feel that it was wrong, why did you join in providing that men should be hung for it?
14721In our present differences, is either party without faith of being in the right?
14721In that arrest all can give aid that will; and who shall be excused that can and will not?
14721In the first place, what is necessary to make the institution national?
14721In what way can that compromise be used to keep Lee''s army out of Pennsylvania?
14721Is Kansas in the Union?
14721Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?
14721Is it not to give such constitutional helps to the rights established by that Constitution as may be practically needed?
14721Is it possible, then, to make that intercourse more advantageous or more satisfactory after separation than before?
14721Is it quite certain that this betters their condition?
14721Is it the right of the people to have slavery or not to have it, as they see fit, in the Territories?
14721Is it true, then, that any right, plainly written in the Constitution, has been denied?
14721Is not that a falsehood?
14721Is not the slavery agitation still an open question in that Territory?...
14721Is that the truth?
14721Is the land any richer?
14721Is the one right any better than the other?
14721Is there a single court or magistrate or individual that would be influenced by it there?
14721Is there any better or equal hope in the world?
14721Is there any mistaking it?
14721Is there such perfect identity of interests among the States to compose a new Union, as to produce harmony only, and prevent renewed secession?
14721Is there, has there ever been, any question that, by the law of war, property, both of enemies and friends, may be taken when needed?
14721Is there-- can there be-- any doubt about this thing?
14721Is this quite just to the creditors?
14721Is this the work of politicians?
14721It forces us to ask:"Is there, in all republics, this inherent and fatal weakness?"
14721It is being executed in the precise way which was intended from the first, else why does no Nebraska man express astonishment or condemnation?
14721It is colour, then; the lighter having the right to enslave the darker?
14721It is enough for my purpose to ask, whenever a Republican said anything against it?
14721Just before reaching the door, Mr. Lincoln came out, and meeting his friend said good- humouredly,"Are you not ahead of time?"
14721Let me ask you why many of us, who are opposed to slavery upon principle, give our acquiescence to a fugitive- slave law?
14721May I ask those who have not differed with me, to join with me in this same spirit towards those who have?
14721Must she still be admitted, or the Union dissolved?
14721Not only so, but if you were to do so, how long would it take the courts to hold your votes unconstitutional and void?
14721Not only so, but is there not another fact,--how came this Dred Scott decision to be made?
14721Now, I wish you to mark, What has become of that squatter sovereignty?
14721Now, can you or not be prevailed upon to pause and to consider whether this is quite just to us, or even to yourselves?
14721Now, my friends, can this country be saved on that basis?
14721Now, on what ground would a member of Congress who is opposed to slavery in the abstract, vote for a fugitive law, as I would deem it my duty to do?
14721Now, then, tell me, if you please, what possible result of good would follow the issuing of such a proclamation as you desire?
14721Now, what is Judge Douglas''s popular sovereignty?
14721Now, who was it that did the work?
14721Now, why is this?
14721One party to a contract may violate it-- break it, so to speak; but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?
14721Or are you going to keep it right alongside of us outrageous fellows?
14721Our political problem now is,"Can we as a nation continue together_ permanently-- for ever_--half slave, and half free?"
14721Pray, will or may not the Know- nothings, if they should get in power, add the word"protestant,"making it read"_ all protestant white men_"?
14721Shall fugitives from labour be surrendered by national or by State authority?
14721Shall he now be arrested in his desolating career?
14721Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step across the ocean and crush us at a blow?
14721Should we not stand by our neighbours who seek to better their conditions in Kansas and Nebraska?
14721The Judge does not seem to be attending to me just now, but I would like to know if it is his opinion that a house divided against itself can stand?
14721The fact is substantially true; but does it prove the issue?
14721The great question with them has been,"Will the negro fight for them?"
14721The question is, will it be wiser to take it as it is and help to improve it, or to reject and disperse it?
14721The question recurs, how shall we fortify against it?
14721Then what is necessary for the nationalization of slavery?
14721Then where is the place to oppose it?
14721Think you these places would satisfy an Alexander, a Cæsar, or a Napoleon?
14721To those, however, who really love the Union may I not speak?
14721Was it possible to lose the nation and yet preserve the Constitution?
14721We deny it; and what is your proof?
14721What are the distinctive merits of these speeches and letters?
14721What are the uses of decisions of courts?
14721What can authorize him to draw any such inference?
14721What can you do in Missouri better than here?
14721What could I do?
14721What disturbed the Unitarian Church in this very city two years ago?
14721What divided the great Methodist Church into two parts, North and South?
14721What do these terms mean?
14721What do those terms mean when used now?
14721What do you understand by supporting the Constitution of a State or of the United States?
14721What for?
14721What good would a proclamation of emancipation from me do, especially as we are now situated?
14721What has become of it?
14721What has ever threatened our liberty and prosperity save and except this institution of slavery?
14721What has jarred and shaken the great American Tract Society recently,--not yet splitting it, but sure to divide it in the end?
14721What has now become of all his tirade against"resistance to the Supreme Court"?
14721What has raised this constant disturbance in every Presbyterian General Assembly that meets?
14721What induced the Southampton insurrection, twenty- eight years ago, in which at least three times as many lives were lost as at Harper''s Ferry?
14721What is a great man?
14721What is conservatism?
14721What is fairly implied by the term Judge Douglas has used,"resistance to the decision"?
14721What is it that we hold most dear amongst us?
14721What is it?
14721What is popular sovereignty?
14721What is popular sovereignty?
14721What is that something?
14721What is there in the language of that speech which expresses such purpose or bears such construction?
14721What is_ sovereignty_ in the political sense of the term?
14721What mysterious right to play tyrant is conferred on a district of country, with its people, by merely calling it a State?
14721What name can I, in common decency, give to this wicked transaction?
14721What next?
14721What of that?
14721What one of us but can call to mind some relative more promising in youth than all his fellows, who has fallen a sacrifice to his rapacity?
14721What other thing that you consider a wrong do you deal with as you deal with that?
14721What then is_ coercion_?
14721What then?
14721What was it placed there for?
14721What was squatter sovereignty?
14721What were they but a clear indication that the framers of the Constitution intended and expected the ultimate extinction of that institution?
14721What would that other channel probably be?
14721What would you do in my position?
14721What, then, are their merits?
14721What?
14721When are we to have peace upon it if it is kept in the position it now occupies?
14721When he had finished, Mr. Lincoln said to him,"Have you a blank card?"
14721When he now says that the people may exclude slavery, does he not make it a question for the people?
14721When is it likely to come to an end?
14721When that is so, how much is left of this vast matter of squatter sovereignty, I should like to know?
14721Which could have come the nearest to doing it without the other?
14721Who defeated it?
14721Who has, in spite of the decision, declared Dred Scott free, and resisted the authority of his master over him?
14721Who is so bold as to do it?
14721Who, then, shall come in at this day and claim that he invented it?
14721Why ask us to do for nothing what two hundred millions of dollars could not induce you to do?
14721Why ask us to do what you will not do yourselves?
14721Why better after the retraction than before the issue?
14721Why declare that within twenty years the African slave- trade, by which slaves are supplied, might be cut off by Congress?
14721Why did you do this?
14721Why do we hold ourselves under obligations to pass such a law, and abide by it when passed?
14721Why even a Senator''s individual opinion withheld till after the presidential election?
14721Why mention a State?
14721Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people?
14721Why should they do anything for us, if we will do nothing for them?
14721Why the delay of a reargument?
14721Why the incoming President''s advance exhortation in favour of the decision?
14721Why the outgoing President''s felicitation on the indorsement?
14721Why this deliberate pressing out of view the rights of men and the authority of the people?
14721Why was the Court decision held up?
14721Why was the amendment expressly declaring the right of the people voted down?
14721Why were all these acts?
14721Why will he not read and understand what I have said?
14721Why will not the North say officially that it wishes for the restoration of the Union as it was?"
14721Why, yes, Douglas did it?
14721Why?
14721Why?
14721Will Dr. Ross be actuated by the perfect impartiality which has ever been considered most favourable to correct decisions?
14721Will anybody there, any more than here, do your work for you?
14721Will some one please tell me where is the_ positive_ law that establishes slavery in Kansas?
14721Will the Judge pretend that Dred Scott was not held there without police regulations?
14721Will they allow me, as an old Whig, to tell them good- humouredly that I think this is very silly?
14721Will you hazard so desperate a step while there is any possibility that any portion of the ills you fly from have no real existence?
14721Will you make war upon us and kill us all?
14721Will you not embrace it?
14721Will you not soon visit Washington again?
14721Will you please tell me by what_ right_ slavery exists in Texas to- day?
14721Will you, while the certain ills you fly to are greater than all the real ones you fly from-- will you risk the commission of so fearful a mistake?
14721Would an exchange of_ names_ be an exchange of_ rights_ upon principle?
14721Would he not at once have freed them?
14721Would it be far wrong to define it"a political community without a political superior?"
14721Would my word free the slaves, when I can not even enforce the Constitution in the rebel States?
14721Would not this be the impression of every fair- minded man?
14721Would the marching of an army into South Carolina, without the consent of her people and with hostile intent towards them, be invasion?
14721Would the number of John Browns be lessened or enlarged by the operation?
14721Would you deal lighter blows rather than heavier ones?
14721Would you drop the war where it is, or would you prosecute it in future with elder- stalk squirts charged with rose- water?
14721Would you give up the contest, leaving any available means untried?
14721Would you have that question reduced to its former proportions?
14721You can not escape this conclusion; and yet, are you willing to abide by it?
14721You do not mean colour exactly?
14721You mean the whites are intellectually the superiors of the blacks, and therefore have the right to enslave them?
14721You produce your proof; and what is it?
14721You say it is wrong; but do n''t you constantly object to anybody else saying so?
14721[ A voice:"Then do you repudiate popular sovereignty?"]
14721[ A voice:"Why do n''t they come out on it?"]
14721_ Fifth._ In case of disaster, would not a retreat be more difficult by your plan than mine?
14721_ First._ Does not your plan involve a greatly larger expenditure of time and money than mine?
14721_ Fourth._ In fact, would it not be less valuable in this, that it would break no great line of the enemy''s communications, while mine would?
14721_ May_ Congress prohibit slavery in the Territories?
14721_ Must_ Congress protect slavery in the Territories?
14721_ Second._ Wherein is a victory more certain by your plan than mine?
14721_ Third._ Wherein is a victory more valuable by your plan than mine?
14721and why do they deserve to be valued and remembered?
14721what is_ invasion_?