- LIBRARY OF THE Theological Semi-nary, JDJ3Ti\rr:KTOTNL N.J. BR 100 .U64 1873 <_ Upham, Thomas Cogswell 1799,-1872. ' s Absolute religion Hook, ABSOLUTE RELIGION. A VIEW OF THE ABSOLUTE RELIGION, BASED ON PHILO- SOPHICAL PRINCIPLES AND THE DOCTRINES OF THE BIBLE. J BY THOMAS C. UPHAM, D.D., LL.D. AUTHOR OF LIFE AND RELIGIOUS OPINIONS OF MADAME DE GUYON, "A SYSTEM OF MENTAL PHILOSOPHY,'" " THE INTERIOR OR HIDDEN LIFE," ETC., ETC. NEW YORK: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS, FOURTH AVE. & TWENTY-THIRD STREET. I 3/3- Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by THOMAS C. UPHAM, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. Wm. McCrea & Co., Stereotypers, lanue, Littlk & Hillmak, PRINTERS, Newburgh, N. Y. 10s TO 1U WoosTIiR StrekT) n . TO THE READER. This Volume, entitled the Absolute Religion, comprises some of the unpublished writings of THOMAS C. Upham, deceased. An amanuensis had been engaged to copy his manuscripts, written with pencil, the day preceding an attack of paralysis, May 20th, 187 1. This paralysis, causing blindness of one eye, and general debility, rendered him unable to give any farther attention to the work. A second attack of paralysis, as he was rising from his bed on the morning of March 10th, 1872, terminated his life April 2d 1872, six o'clock a. m., at the age of seventy three years. During these three weeks of prostration he was unable to articulate distinctly. The only connected sentence clearly understood is this : "My spirit is with God." Several chapters of the work were left partly written, and of other chapters, only the headings and leading thoughts remain. The fact that the author did not complete the work, must be received as an apology for any lack of completeness, in the outline, arrangement and finish of the work. The aim of the author seems to be to unfold and to har- monize as far as may be, religious views and opin- ions, by explaining them on the basis of a sound IV TO THE READER. philosophy, in the hope that some minds might be benefited by such a philosophical statement. The aim is a great one. And the philosophic and chris- tian man who loves to see God in providence, and God in man, and religion a reasonable service, will appreciate this effort of one who made the study of man in his mental powers and capacities, the one great study of his life ; and whose highest aim, in every practical way, was to benefit by word and deed his brother man. The responsibility of issuing such a work, which the author did not complete, and which he did not himself revise, is only balanced by the desire that good may be accomplished however imperfect the work. The following sentences are an extract from his preface to " Divine Union " a work published by him in 1857, and are appropriate here. " In writing this work I have no private or party interests to subserve, but only wish to do, what I may seem, in the providence of God called to do, for that cause of Christ, of God, and humanity, which is dearer to me than anything else. And this is a consolation which always attends me, — the full belief that the truth will live and do the good appropriate to it, and that all error will and must die." PHCEBE LORD UPHAM. New York, May, 1873. CONTENTS. I. TAUE The Absolute Religion considered in connection with the Doctrines of the Bible, especially the Teach- ings of Christ' . .9 II. The Personality of God 20 III. God as Life 32 IV. Identity of Life and Love 3S V. God as Unity and Duality .45 VI. The Son of God 68 VII. Necessity and Possibility of a Divine Manifestation . 79 VIII. Christ as the Fulfilment of the Law .... 88 IX. The Second or New Birth 95 viii CONTENTS. X. PAGE Relation of the First to the Second Birth . . . 102 XL Relation of Moral Evil to Freedom, and its Remedy . 116 XII. The Divine Purposes 128 XIII. Universality of Religious Thought 138 XIV. Harmony of Religiour Opinions 147 XV. Optimism 154 XVI. The Objective and Subjective in Religion . . . .163 XVII. Unities and Diversities . 169 XVIII. View of the Doctrine of Sacrifices . . . . .179 XIX. Growth of the Idea of God 185 XX. Of the Satisfaction of Divine Justice . . . .191 CONTENTS. ix XXI. PAGE The Doctrine of a Judgment affirmed by Absolute Religion J 95 XXII. The Doctrine of Heaven and Hell 199 XXIII. Of the Sin against the Holy Ghost, or the Sin which cannot be forgiven 209 XXIV. Prayer in its Relation to the Absolute Religion . . 215 XXV. Relation of Faith to Salvation 222 XXVI. Divine Influences 22 § XXVII. Explanation of Existing Practical Methods of Teach- ing . 2 35 XXVIII. Contrasted Views of the Selfish and Essential Life . 242 XXIX. Mediatorialism as a Universal and Practical Principle . 251 XXX. Explanation of Terms Regarding the Essential Life . 262 x CONTENTS. XXXI. PAGE Evidences of the Existence of the Essential Life . . 268 XXXII. The Essential Life Reaches to all Existences . . 280 XXXIII. The Power of the Essential Life 288 XXXIV. Locality of God and the Moment — Personal Experi- ence '. 297 Absolute Religion . CHAPTER I. The Absolute Religion considered in connection with the doctrines of the Bible, especially the teachings of Christ. i. It is not difficult for the reflecting mind to see, in the currents of thought which characterize the present period, a tendency to bring into notice, and to give emphasis to what is called the Absolute Religion. Many persons, who would not willingly be regarded as irreligious, have expressed a desire for a religion founded upon the exercise of reason and upon philosophical principles, and not exclu- sively or chiefly upon authority. The utterance which is heard in this direction, is every day grow- ing louder and more imperative. It is the expres- sion of the views and feelings of persons whose sin- cerity cannot well be doubted ; and who, at least, have a claim upon our respect for the intellectual I0 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. ability which they have often manifested. It is an utterance, therefore, whether addressed to us as Christians, or merely as men of thought and philo- sophic inquiry, which cannot wisely be allowed to go unheeded. 2. The first inquiry which claims our attention, is, What are we to understand by the Absolute Religion ? It is perhaps proper to say, that the an- swer to this question will be likely to develop itself more fully and satisfactorily in the course of the dis- cussions which are to follow. And yet a few words on the subject may properly be said here. In the first place it may be remarked in general terms and without going minutely into reasons, that the Abso- lute Religion is that religion which, harmonizing with the truths and requisitions of God on the one hand, and with the nature of man as related to God on the other, is necessarily as wide in its extent and its application as humanity itself; — a religion which neither limited by geographical boundaries, nor de- pendent for its existence on civil and political enact- ments, is the inheritance of all men equally, what- ever their name or place or condition, by virtue of their common nature. In other words, it is a reli- gion which is universal. In the second place, it is that religion which finding its subjective expression in ideas rather than ABSOLUTE RELIGION. H in sensations, and in those ideas which are fundamen- tal in themselves and in their relations, vindicates its claim to Absoluteness, because it is unchangeable ; and is therefore the religion, not only of all men and all nations but of all time and all ages. That reli- gion, which is found to be merely an incident of a na- tion's or people's history, and which passes away with the transition of the temporary circumstances on which it is founded, fails to present any just claim to this character of immutableness and universality. The Absolute Religion is something very different from this. Founded in the nature and constitution of things, but harmonizing with the thought and sustained by the power of the highest Intelligence in the universe, and being revealed to human appre- hension by means of fundamental and universal ideas, which speak inwardly and intuitionally and with a voice of authority, it is necessarily a religion which exists everywhere, and exists forever. No antagon- isms of the changeable and the finite, no chance nor change, which mars the face of human affairs, nor hardness of heart, nor slowness of belief, can triumph over the truth and supremacy which are its basis. 3. Characterized by universality in its extent and application, and by permanency in duration, it has al- so this distinctive and paramount feature, that it car- ries with it a binding and controlling obligation upon 12 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. the thoughts, feelings and actions of all men and of all moral beings, by a virtue or power which is lodged in itself, and not by means or in virtue of any power, authority or command outside of itself. It may be aided by such outside influences but is not neces- sarily dependent upon them. Its authority is its own ; its word is law. It may not be out of place to make the explanatory remark here, that there is a great difference between a thing considered in its own nature, and its announcement or revelation. The thing or object in question presents itself in one aspect ; the announcement of it in another. For in- stance, the announcement of the Absolute Religion may have occurred at a particular period or in a par- ticular country, in the era of Moses, or in the era of Christ, at Sinai or at Jerusalem, at Rome or Athens, or in other periods and in other countries ; but the thing itself, the religious truth, involved by a sort of eternal, generation in the great facts of the universe, has no time or place, no beginning or end. 4. Such, in general terms is the Absolute Reli- gion. This religion has had its interpreters in all ages of the world ; men who, with different degrees of mental illumination, have attempted to give ex- pression to the great religious thought, written in the hieroglyphics of universal nature ; — Socrates, Plato, Cicero, Seneca, Confucius, Zoroaster, Sakya- ABSOLUTE RELIGION. 13 Mouni, and many others, who have seen some- thing of the great interior light, which is destined in the progress of its rising to illuminate all lands, and to harmonize all moral and religious separations. I allude to these men who seem to me to have been to some extent the subjects of a divine guidance, in no lightness of spirit, but with a sincere reverence and gratitude. Each in his degree and place, and in reference to his age and country, may be regarded as having a divine mission, and as being in some im- portant sense the minister of God. Nevertheless there came in the fullness of time a Man who was greater than these. If I have studied him aright in what has been left us of his life and doctrines, the great teacher of the Absolute Religion, and stand- ing far above all others in the measurement of his insight, is Jesus of Nazareth. The highest and most reliable expression of the Absolute Religion is found as it seems to me in his wonderful words. 5. The object of the present work, undertaken with much mistrust of myself but in the hope that it will be found to harmonize with the truth, is not only to announce some of the leading doctrines of the Absolute Religion, but to show their identity with the doctrines of Christ. The religion of Christ, which is only another name for the principles involv- ed in the teachings of Christ, is the Absolute Reli- 14 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. gion ; because having incarnated itself in Christ and thus shown its divine beauty in the human form, it henceforth belongs to man, not perhaps in the tem- porary and changing incidents of his history, but to man in his essential and universal nature, and there- fore is the religion of humanity. The religion of Christ is the Absolute Religion because, though it may be said in its personal applications to grow up and to put forth the buds and flowers of feeling, the rich and beautiful experiences of emotions and af- fections, it nevertheless has its root in the deepest thought, and is both grounded in, and harmonizes with, unchangeable intuitions. The religion of Christ is the Absolute Religion, though man is its object, and is also, in the exercise of his powers of perception and reasoning, the appointed and neces- sary instrument of its development, yet being found- ed in the nature and constitution of things, and thus being beyond measurements of time, it synchronizes with God himself in its origin and continuance, and goes step by step with the divine authority in the assertion of its universal empire. 6. I am aware, that the high claims now put forth in favor of the religion of Christ, considered in its relation to the absolute truth, are not always al- lowed by that class of thinkers and inquirers to whom allusion was made in the beginning of the chapter. ABSOLUTE RELIGION. I 5 And what is more, they are not always, and perhaps not generally insisted on by those who are distinct- ively and truly known as Christians. Not unfre- quently the Christian says, as if conscious of his ina- bility to stand firm in the great battle of thought, and willing to find the first refuge that presents itself, that the religion of Christ, standing on a basis peculiar to itself, may be regarded as above and beyond reason. I confess that I hesitate in the acceptance of such expressions. So far from this being the correct view, there is a sense undoubtedly, in which it may be affirmed without presumption, that there is nothing above reason ; neither God nor the creatures of God ; neither men nor angels ; neither finite nor Infinite. If it be admitted that God exists, it is still true, that he is not available to us as an existence, and is not known to us as an ex- istence, and his existence cannot be logically affirm- ed and accepted, except through the instrumentality of perception and reasoning. If indeed by reason be meant that sad semblance of reason, which by its own action is separated from, and is not enlightened and aided by contact with the everlasting truth ; in other words, that form of reason or semblance of rea- son, which in being separated from the great Source and Guide of all our faculties is perverted by igno- rance, prejudice, and passion, then the matter pre- : 6 absolute religion. sents itself in another aspect, and is entitled to an- other answer. But reason in the true sense, reason in the greatness of its intuitional, as well as its rela- tional and inductive movement, reason such as God is able to incarnate inspirationally in the thought and intellect of man, has nothing above it. True reason is God's highest thought ; it holds a position which it cannot change ; it sustains an office which it cannot abnegate ; and the whole universe is not only dependent upon it for its revelation as an object of knowledge, but in all its coming progress accepts its aid, and marches in harmony with it. 7. — Let it be understood furthermore, that we have no controversy with much of that which is known in the history of human knowledge under the name of philosophy. The philosophers have had their time of affirmation ; and undoubtedly they have said instructive things on a great variety of. subjects. They have felt at liberty to speak with boldness on the subject now before us ; and some- times with a smile of incredulity and even of opposi- tion on their lips, as if it were a thing impossible, that the peasant of Nazareth, the man who was cru- cified, could hold up a light in the presence of the world's philosophic thought and culture. Neverthe- less the child of the humble Judean mother made the attempt. We read that when he was Only twelve ABSOLUTE RELIGION. 1 7 years of age, the inspiration from the heavens was so strong upon him and his heart was so full, that he entered into this great controversy. And even then his understanding and answers were matters of astonishment. But the hand of the mother, who was chosen to bring him within the sphere of hu- manity, withdrew him from the contest. Her heart had prophetic intimations of the future ; but the time had not yet come. He dwelt in Nazareth, and with his heart open to the influx of the truth, he " increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man." And when in the maturity of man- hood he came again into the field, his opponents met him with all the appliances and aids of human learning and wisdom ; but ignorant of that divine philosophy which is baptized from the * heavens, and therefore greatly disordered and defeated in the ar- gument, they stopped the discussion by nailing Him to the Cross. But there is something in the man of truth which can never die. He passed on. In the language of the Scriptures, he went up on high. And philosophy, not understanding the things which are seen by faith and not by sight, looked here and there but could not find Him. The teacher of Nazareth, dead but living, no longer a child but clothed with heavenly manhood, and who teaches by means of inspirations and influ- !g ABSOLUTE RELIGION. ences wrought in the great school of the human heart, still claims his right to be heard. He is still a teacher of the Absolute Religion. 8. — It remains to be added, which I think will naturally occur to the reader, that the doctrine of the Absolute Religion pertains to essentials and not to the mere incidents of things ; to the principles rather than the form ; and not so much to institu- tions and ceremonies, as to that which underlies them. It deals with those things, as we have already seen, which from their nature bear the stamp of per manency ; things which are because they cannot fail to be ; things which exist because non-existence is an impossibility ; whereas ceremonies, outward forms, institutions which have beginnings, changes and end, and mere outward arrangements and incidents of any kind, which are the result of specific and positive enactment, are temporary and unsettled in their na- ture and are short in their duration. And therefore, it will not be surprising, if there are many things which will not be noticed in what follows ; and sim- ply because they fall out of the natural line of our remarks, and receive their appropriate attention in other connections and with other methods of treat- ment. 9. — The work which I have undertaken is de- ABSOLUTE RELIGION: 19 signed to be pacific in its spirit, and is not necessarily controversial. It does not at all follow, because a writer deals with a controverted subject, that his dis- cussion of such a subject must necessarily be harsh and controversial in its spirit or aspect. In what I have to say, I shall make but little reference to names and persons, and parties. I deal with principles rather than with men. And it is not beyond my hope that the truth will be found, and that charity will be unbroken. CHAPTER II. The Personality of God. I. — God exists. The existence of God is a doc- trine of the Absolute Religion. It is true there are said to be Atheists. Perhaps there may be individ- uals, not very many in number, to whom that name of error and sadness may apply. As long as great perversions of the human mind are possible, varying from the numerous forms of temporary disturbance to partial or total insanity, it is not unphilosophical to suppose that atheism, in the case of a few indi- viduals is a possibility. But I know not that there are atheistic communities or peoples. Humanity, into which we are to search for the development of principles, is represented by masses. The masses of mankind, as they are found associated in large socie- ties and communities, have never rejected the idea of a God. No historian, from the days of Herodotus and Thucydides, has furnished us the records of an THE PERSONALITY OE GOD. 2 I atheistic nation. We are justified therefore in ta- king the position, that the idea of a God belongs to humanity. As a product of intellectualism, it finds its origin in part in processes of reasoning founded on the perceptions, but has a still closer alliance with the intuitions ; and the Being whom it reveals com- mands by a law of our nature, the reverential and loving homage of the heart. So clearly is the doc- trine of God's existence inscribed upon the works of outward nature, as they are interpreted by the hu- man intellect, so strongly is this doctrine affirmed by the interior convictions and intuitions, and so necessary is it in response to the yearnings of the human heart, that I cannot feel the necessity of en- tering into argument in relation to it. I take it for granted. 2. — But there is a matter, connected with the di- vine existence, which cannot well be omitted, and which is of great importance. I refer to the doctrine of the Personality of God. Various circum- stances have brought this question into prominence, and justify giving attention to it. Within a few years no small number of writers of acknowledged learning and ability have greatly disturbed the tra- ditional belief as well as the religious hopes and con- solations of a large portion of the Christian world, by affirming and attempting to prove the imperson- 22 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. ality of the Divine Being. In accordance with our plan of inquiry we shall endeavor to show, that the Personality of God is taught by the absolute method ; and that the teachings of the Absolute Religion, in this particular as well as in others of a fundamentally religious nature, are in harmony with the Christian doctrine. 3. — It cannot well be doubted, that the person- ality of God is one of the doctrines contained in the teachings of Christ. It is difficult to see how he could address God as his Father, and in terms im- plying the greatest veneration and love, without be- lieving in the Personality of God. When, in the trials and sorrows of the Cross, he prayed, " Father forgive them for they know not what they do ;'' and when in the final agony of his spirit he said, " my God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me," it cannot well be supposed that he believed he was praying to an abstraction, or to a spiritual generalization, or a great undefined princi- ple of life, instead of a percipient Being, who in the mental or spiritual sense had ears to hear, and a heart to feel. We cannot doubt, that the careful readers of the New Testament, in view of what is there said having a bearing upon the subject now before us, fully and earnestly accept the idea, as the only one which can be reasonably entertained, that THE PERSONALITY OF GOD. 23 Jesus believed in the divine personality. This won- derful Being, of whom we shall have occasion to speak more fully hereafter, had a heart that wor- shipped. His intellectual powers, which are some- times overshadowed and concealed by the manifes- tations of his great goodness, revealed and identi- fied the object of his worship ; and his loving heart, which added emotion to perception, accepted the revelation and yielded its homage. But affirm that God is not a personal being, only an underlying principle or causative force which permeates all ex- istences and develops itself in all the forms of ex- istence, without the intelligence and responsibility which are implied in personality and only by means of fixed and inexorable law, and from that moment it is intuitionally evident, that there is no revela- tion of an object of worship because no such object exists. And worship itself, which is so obviously one of the leading characteristics of the inward life of Christ, necessarily ceases, because there is no ob- ject to which it can attach itself. 4. — But philosophy, or something which goes under that great though often perverted name, has in these later times taken a different view. Those who are acquainted with the speculations and sug- gestions on this subject, associated, more or less dis- tinctly with the names of Helvetius, Diderot, Con- 24 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. dorcet, D'Alembert, Hume, Gibbon, Fichte, Hegel, Compte, Herbert Spencer, Mills, Strauss, Feuerbach and others, know well how confidently God has been announced as a principle of activity and causa- tion, but without the recognized attribute of a per- son ; in other words as a great spiritual or psychical energy, pervading all things that exist, and holding a fixed and necessary relation to results, but with- out a distinct and available responsibility, and with- out even knowing or having any interest in know- ing what the results of its own activity shall be. It is painful to know how widely such speculations have affected the thoughts and feelings of men. But this doctrine of God, which analyzed to its re- sults is practically the annihilation of God, is a very different thing from the simple, sublime, and truly philosophic idea of God, which is justly understood as holding a place in the doctrines of Christ. The God of the Bible, from the earliest to the latest portion of its announcements is a personal God. All that is said of God in that great treasury of thought, including the personal teachings ol Christ, with all its affirmations of his eternity and universality, recognizes and emphasizes the great and essential fact of his personality. And we cannot hesitate in saying, that a true philosophy, when applied to the doctrines of reli- THE PERSONALITY OF GOD. 2 $ gion, in other words that the Absolute Religion, or Religion developed in the highest and truest hu- man thought and feeling, is on the side of the bibli- cal teachings. 5. — And let us now look at the subject in a little different aspect, with a view as briefly as possible, to bring it to the test of facts and reason. Before we can either affirm or deny the personality of God, we must first make personality itself, separate from the being to whom it attaches and of whom it is predi- cated, the subject of our thought. It is at this point that we detect what seems to us the beginning of a great error. Personality is not merely a name ; nor is it merely an idea. In order to know fully what it is, we must go back from the name to the idea ; and from the idea or thought to the fact or truth which the idea represents. The name is merely an aid to the thought ; an auxiliary or help in the use of the thought. The thought or idea of personality, which arises necessarily in the mind under the appropriate circumstances-of its origin, is justly regarded as a simple or elementary idea ; and as such it may be admitted that it is not susceptible of that logical process which is known as a definition. And yet not being what Mr. Locke would call an illusive or chimerical idea, but one harmonizing with the truth 2 2 6 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. of things, it involves and affirms to our interior con- victions and belief the fact or verity of the thing to which it relates. And hence, in connection with the necessary laws of mental action, we have a basis, and we cannot get it in any other way, for affirming the fact of personality. We say for instance in relation to ourselves and say it without hesitation that we are personal beings. And when we thus come to personality itself, in distinction from the idea of it ; when we reach the verity or reality of the fact in distinction from its intellectual representation, if it should happen that definitions in the usual logical form fail to make it more clearly known, on account of its interior and elementary nature, it is still both clear in itself as a matter of internal and intuitional revelation, and we can also obtain to some extent additional knowledge of what it is by the indirect process of indicating what it is not. For instance, personality, in distinction from the idea or intellectual representation of personality, and considered as a fact or verity actually existing and of which it can be affirmed that it is, is not identical with existence, nor is it identical with knowledge, nor with power, nor with activity, nor with expan- sion. It may have its important relations with any or all of them ; but it requires to be kept distinct, both in its idea through which it is represented to THE PERSONALITY OF GOD. 2 7 us, and also in its fact or realization. A Being, sep- arate in the mere fact of existence from other beings, who has actually powers of perception and affection, and who can not only know and judge and feel, but has the volitional power which can carry his judg- ments and feelings to their appropriate issues, has necessarily a personality, whether his susceptibilities of knowledge be greater or less, or whether the mere extent or expansion of his existence be greater or less, or whether he comes within the limits of our comprehension or not. The convictions of the hu- man mind, arising by their own necessary laws of being, require us in such a case to affirm the fact or realization of personality, and enable us to say with- out any misgivings, that we have before us a per- sonal being. We have not merely the idea of per- sonality, which is a matter of interior or subjective experience and nothing more ; but we have before us the fact of personality, in its outward or objective realization. 6. — With this view of the matter before us, and on such fundamental principles, we proceed to af- firm that God is a personal being. The doctrine that God is an impersonal being, probably owes its origin in part to a mistake in the philosophical ele- ments involved in the doctrine of personality, and in part to the fact, that God is without limits. As 2 8 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. we have been in the habit of ascribing personality to beings who, in having form, are subject to the limitations of form, we easily fall into the habit of associating personality with such limitations, and at last are apt to adopt the conclusion, that where there are no limits, no well-defined boundaries of existence constituting a form, there can be no per- sonality. Now it must be admitted, that in the ex- tent or expansion of his being, God is without lim- its; but it does not at all follow that God, because he transcends the limitations of the human senses, and is not the subject of material measurement or any other measurement, is therefore not a personal God. The question of personality does not turn upon mere extent or expansion of being, whether physically or even psychically considered, but rath- er upon the traits or characteristics of being. In considering the subject of God's personality, it is a proper inquiry, whether he possesses intelligence which is cognizant of the fact of his own existence and power ; whether he has the capability of know- ing and affirming the fixed relation of himself, both in perception and action, to that interior law of rec- titude which is also a part of his being ; whether he possesses a volitional power correspondent to the powers of perception and the claims of moral obli- gation ? It is in the answer to such questions as THE PERSONALITY OF GOD. 29 these, that we find the basis of personality consider- ed as a fact or realization. And if the answer is in the affirmative, then God most evidently possesses all the requisites of personality, and stands forth be- fore the universe, not merely as a blind and unintel- ligent principle of movement, but as a personal God, capable of intelligent design and action, endowed with responsibility both to himself and to all beings that are dependent on him, and entitled, in the case of those who are dependent, to obedience and hom- age. 7. — And it is proper to say here, as an indirect confirmation of our position, that humanity de- mands a God who can thus be recognized and wor- shipped. The instinct of reverence and homage, which evidently pervades the human heart, so much so that it has found its place as an attribute of hu- manity in all lands and all ages, requires, and cannot be satisfied with anything short of a personal God. In the view of the great masses of men, to deny the personality of God, is, to all practical purposes and results, much the same, as we have already intima- -ted as to deny the existence of God. So that we run no hazard in saying, that a personal God is one of the great religious necessities of humanity. Re- ligion is the interior and domestic tie, which makes the united family of the finite and the Infinite. 30 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. And without a Being, who is not only supreme in his attributes, but who is approachable, and can be addressed and confided in, on the basis furnished by a deific personality, the human race is necessarily left in the condition of a bewildered and sorrowing orphanage. 8. — And we may add that the opposite doctrine that which denies God's personality, seems to us to be full of danger in other respects. It is not only the abnegation of religion, but of practical morality. The doctrine of impersonality, admitting that it some- times comes before us with learned and imposing pretensions, will be found, if allowed to go unques- tioned, to be attended not only with the rupture of God and man, but of man and his fellow-man. It is a doctrine which not only strikes boldly at the re- ligious intuitions of the great heart of humanity, but is an inlet, through its want of practical power, to hostility, fraud, cruelty, and all varieties of crime. No theory of practical morals has ever been con- structed on the basis of the impersonality of God, which is available against the mighty evils that con- tinually imperil man's social condition. The auda- city of wrong and crime is not frightened by an ab- straction. Nor is it much afraid of a positive princi- ple of life, which has no self-regulated thought and volition. If it were possible for impersonality to THE PERSONALITY OF GOD. o X leave us a God at all, which it is not, it would be a God with no eyes to see, and no cars to hear, and no hands to handle, and no head to think, and no heart to feel, and no will to execute ; — a God, if any one should object to the material form of the expres- sions, with nothing which our spiritual eyes could see, or our spiritual ears could hear, or our hearts' necessities could appeal to ; — a God, in any light in which it is possible to consider him, without a voice to cheer us in our efforts to do right, and without a hand to help us against the dangers which would certainly assail and overwhelm us. CHAPTER III. God as Life. I. — In subjecting the doctrines of Religion to the estimate of the Absolute, and in thus bringing them to the test of fundamental reason, so that the reli- gious announcement or doctrine, whatever it may be, shall be found identical with the eternal truth or otherwise, it will be necessary to say something of life as an ultimate and necessary principle, and to affirm and verify its identity with God. Every one knows how common a thing it is to speak of God, not only as great and independent in himself, but as sustaining a causative relation, and as being the pri mal source and living principle or life of all things. But God could not be the source or life of other things without having life in himself. God is Life. And the question naturally arises in the inquiring mind what Life is ? In answering this question, it is admitted that we may not be able, in consequence of its ultimate and primary position, to say what life is, in itself considered : but it will aid much in giving GOD AS LIFE. 33 clearness to our conceptions, if we proceed to give concisely but distinctly some of its marks or charac- teristics. I. — One of the marks or characteristics of Life, in its primary or ultimate sense, in distinction from anything of a subordinate or secondary nature which may sometimes bear that name, is, that it is without beginning. If the Life, meaning by the term what may be conveniently designated as the true or essen- tial Life, could not be said to exist without a begin- ning, then it would be true, that there was a time, (namely, the time antecedent to its beginning,) when it had no existence : a doctrine, which would leave the universe for unnumbered ages without any life- giving principle. It is hardly necessary to say that this is a view which is inadmissible. And besides, if there was a time when the Essential Life did not exist, and afterwards a time when it began to exist, then, inasmuch as not having existed at first it could not have created itself, it must have been brought into being by another Life antecedent to it in exist- ence. And if there was another principle of Life antecedent to it in existence, which was without be- ginning and had also by means of its higher and broader nature the power of developing existence in other forms, then that antecedent life was, and is, the Essential Life. Therefore it is reasonable to say 2* 34 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. that one of the marks or characteristics of Life, in the true and higher sense of that term, is, that it is without beginning. 2. — Another mark or characteristic of Life, in the higher or essential sense, is, that it is eternal. Eter- nity, which has reference to termination as well as commencement, and excludes both, is without begin- ning and also without end. The Essential Life is eternal. And it is so because it is without begin- ning. That which exists -without beginning to exist, has the reason or ground of existence in itself; and, therefore, having life in itself and of itself, there is no reason why it should die. The fact of existence, with no reason of existence but what is found in itself, obviously involves the idea of eternity of exist- ence. Being what it is, and with adequate reasons for thus being, and without any dependence for its existence on any thing outside of itself, it necessarily continues to be what it is. Continuance is the oppo- site of cessation. The Essential Life, therefore is eternal. 3. — Another and third characteristic of the great living principle which we are considering, is that it is universal. If the principle of Life is limited, then, place the limitation wherever you may, the great universe of things, in comparison with which the restricted or limited universe is as nothing, is GOD AS LIFE. 35 beyond this limit ; reaching out in all directions in immensity which is boundless; and this infinitely wider or true universe is a universe without life, which is inconceivable. The fixed and necessary conceptions of the human intellect require life, wherever there is a capacity of life. A universe without life is nothing more or less than universal death. The doctrine of a universe without life is just as contradictory to the conceptions of the intui- tive or suggestional intellect of man, (that depart- ment of our nature which gives us all our primary or elementary ideas,) as would be the doctrine of a universe without the attendant conceptions and facts of space and time. It is on such grounds, stated as briefly as possible, that we are justified in the asser- tion, that the Essential Life is universal. 4. — A fourth mark or characteristic is, that it is a life which in its own interior nature is without change. Changes spring out of it, since it is that essential unity of existence out of which comes all variety. But in itself it is unchangeable. And it is so, because it is eternal and universal. Being eter- nal, it cannot limit itself in time ; and being univer- sal, it cannot limit itself in place. And being thus commensurate with all place and time, meeting the wants of every moment of time and of every condi- tion of things, a change in its own nature, whatever 36 ABSOLUTE RELIGION may be true of change in its varied manifestations, becomes an impossibility. It is life now ; and it is life always. And it is the same life, the same in its nature and extent, to-day, yesterday, and for- ever. 5. — Another characteristic of the Essential Life is, that it never ceases in its action. Activity is a part of its nature ; it is a principle, which ever goes out of its subject to its object, and finds the neces- sary nourishment of its own life in the good it does to another. To cease to act, therefore, would be to cease to live. It is true, that it changes its modes of action ; and this change of mode in action may be regarded as furnishing the compensation of rest ; but still, there is properly speaking, no cessation of activity. And accordingly, in being a" perpetual life, it is also a perpetual development. Always one, and yet exhaustless and countless in its diver- sity ; the endless out-going of the central infinite in the multiplied and constantly varied manifestations of the finite. 6. — It is, then, a life which is endless, boundless, changeless, ceaseless ; the source of all other life, because it is itself the true life ; and the source also in. an important sense of all knowledge, because knowledge is inseparable from Life in its highest GOD AS LIFE. 37 form ; and yet, Life in its own nature, in many re- spects, is necessarily and forever unknown. And now comes a remarkable fact. Such char- acteristics as have now been described, will apply equally well to God, and to God only. The charac- teristics of Life are equally the characteristics of God. And they justify us in saying, that God has the true life in himself; that God is not only the great causative and living principle of all things, but more concisely and yet truly, that God is Life. CHAPTER IV. Identity of Life and Love. I. — But there is something additional, notwith- standing the possible limitations of our knowledge in some important respects, which may help us to a more interior view of the nature of Life. There is something within the limits of human experience, which allies us to the great Source from which we come, and which may be appealed to in these in- quiries. The Essential Life, in recognizing itself in its causative and sustaining form as existing in hu- manity, and in being thus brought in some degree within the sphere of human comprehension, and made the subject of human analysis, reveals itself as Love. So that in view of the evidences that at- tend it, we may venture to lay down the proposi- tion, that Love and Life are essentially the same: a proposition so wide in its sweep and so fruitful in its consequences that, while its evidences compel the acquiescence and homage of the intellect, its IDENTITY OF' LIFE AND LOVE. 39 tendencies and results, when rightly understood, fill the heart with joy. 2. — In prosecuting the inquiries of this chapter, we derive an argument in support of the identity of Life and Love, in the first place, from the Divine Nature itself. And such an argument, harmonizing with the Absolute methods of thought, brings our conclusions, so far as they have a religious aspect at all, within the limits of the Absolute Religion. God is Life: God is Love. In being inseparable from' all existences, in be- ing the central causative principle of all existences, and in harmonizing with all existences, there is no possible motive or reason why the Divine Life should not be interested, (the relative position and responsibilities of all being taken into account,) in seeking the good, the happiness, and the perfection of all. Its motive of action cannot turn back upon itself and seek a causation prior to that which is al- ready first, because, being infinite itself, it cannot ascend a higher height, or sound a deeper depth, than it has in its own nature. And thus standing central, and at the same time without limitation, and consequently having no power outside of itself to excite its fears, or to limit its responsibilities, what strength of thought or ingenuity of conception can suggest a motive in the Infinite Mind, which is 40 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. adverse to the universal good. In other words, the Life of God, in its substance and essentiality, is, and must be, a Life of Love. 3- — And now let us look at the subject in another aspect. Love, in distinction from the counterfeits of love ; we mean that divine love, which " casts out fear," and which pursues the good of its object for the sake of the good and not for the sake of reward ; such love has all the marks or characteristics which have already been ascribed to the Essential Life. It was said of Essential Life that it has no beginning. The same can be said of Love. Looking at love psychologically, and in one of its most distinguishing aspects, it may be described as simply benevolent desire, or the desire of good. And like every other desire, it involves in its very nature and as a part of its nature, a tendency to activity and to practical results. It is essentially a motive power. Now take the universe as the theatre of inquiry, and say whether Love, considered as a motive power, has or can nave, admits . or can admit, of any active and causative power antecedent to itself. Looking at the question psychologically, it seems to us that only three suppositions are possible in the case ; first, indifference, which is not life, but the negation of life ; second, the desire of evil, which, if it be admit- ted as the primal activity, would annihilate God, and IDENTITY OF LIFE AND LOVE. 41 enthrone Satan ; and third, the desire of good, which is only another name for Love. Now apply this analysis to God. If God exists at all, he exists as Essential Life. As essential life, He is essential activity ; and that, too, without a be- ginning of such activity. Forever, and as a part of his nature, He must have had in himself a motivity a principle of action. That principle of activity, could not have been indifference ; for that would be a contradiction in terms. It could not be the desire of evil, for that would constitute a satanic Infinite. On the only remaining supposition, it must have been the desire of good or love. Love therefore, is, and, from the nature of the case, must be, the con- stitutive activity of the universe. And being central in the infinite nature, we may say of it as we say of God, it is without beginning ; and, therefore it is, and must be to that extent, the same with the Es- sential Life of things. 4. — And again, looking at the subject a little fur- ther, we need not hesitate to say, that the circum- stances and intuitions which necessitate the affirma- tion, that Love is without beginning, involve also the additional affirmation, that Love is without end- ing, in other words, it is eternal. And as it has no beginning, and no ending, and thus covers all time ; so, looking at it in another aspect, and by means of 42 ABSOLUTE RELIGION, other processes of thought, such as will easily sug- gest themselves, we are under the necessity of affirm- ing further that the principle under consideration is a principle without limitation ; a principle surmount- ing the boundaries which might be supposed to stop its progress, and reaching to every place and every object within the realms of actual or possible exist- ence. And this great principle, without beginning and without end, reaching to all objects and living in all events, universal by the same necessities which compel the fact of its eternity, is thus made to stand forth with the same attributes and the same features as the Essential Life. So that we are justified in saying that Life is Love, and Love is Life. And God, who is the embodiment of life, is the embodi- ment of love ; and is what He is, whether He is called God or Life, because He is Love. 5. — These views are the views of the Absolute Religion ; views which involve the unchangeable facts and relations of things, and have the sanction of the highest reason ; and if God had not taught them in the Scriptures, we should still be held ac- countable by the light that is within. But the reli- gion of enlightened reason and the religion of the Bible are one ; thorough and candid inquiries, enlight- ened by the spirit of humility and faith, will not fail to harmonize them. And hence we open the Bible, IDENTITY OF LIFE AND LOVE. 43 and find that wonderful expression, repeated and emphasized in its essential meaning in a variety of forms, " God is Love.'' This great truth, upon which hinges the destiny of the universe, seems to have developed itself especially in the bosom of the apostle John. Without going through long pro- cesses of reasoning and possibly without any train- ing in such processes, he nevertheless had the grand intuitions of the heart, and uttered affirmations, which God in the soul had taught him. Plato, the first of Grecian philosophers, could affirm that God a geometrizes,'' and he uttered a truth, correspond- ing in depth and comprehension to this wonderful saying of the humble and loving disciple. 6. — The doctrine that Love is identical with Life, brings the subject of the Essential Life within the sphere of human cognitions. It is true that Love, considered as Life, operates in all space and all time ; but it is also true that it does this, without being identical with either. So that it can be said, in ex- pressions which imperfectly convey the idea, that it is the life of space without being space, the life of time without being time ; in other words, a principle and not an expansion, an elemental activity, and not an outward, material measurement. And hence arises both the fact and the possibility of its incar- nation. The Essential Life, whether called Life or 44 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. Love, is individual as well as universal ; dwelling in God, and dwelling more or less, in all the creatures of God who are born into his image. And since the day when Christ walked in the valley of Nazareth, and wept in the garden of Gethsemane, it can be said that the life of God dwells in the soul of man, and the problem of the Infinite, so far as its most essen- tial element is concerned, is brought within the field of human consciousness, and is made the subject of human affirmation. The holy man, whoever and wherever he may be, walks in life ; — the same divine and essential life which dwells in the bosom of the Infinite. The life of the follower of Christ is the same in its essence with the life of Christ. There is a philosophical and substantial foundation for that wonderful but most true assertion of the apostle Paul, "I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me." The essential life of Christ was LOVE ;— the cross of Cal- vary was only its necessary resultant, and its divine symbol. The cross is Love : and in that view of the interior and subjective nature of the cross, it stands as a bright and perpetual reality in the heart of every Christian. CHAPTER V. God as Unity and Duality. I. — Having given in the preceding chapters some of the marks or characteristics of Life, and shown its identity with Love ; and having seen that God is Life in the highest sense of the term, or what may conveniently be named Essential Life ; in other words, that the fact of his existence is a problem of necessity, that Life is in Him by essence or being, that He cannot be otherwise than what He is, and is without beginning and without end ; and having seen also that God, notwithstanding the objections that have been so freely made in these later times, is a Personality, and is susceptible of being recog- nized and approached as such; we are now prepared to go a step further, and to say in the light both of the Absolute Religion and the Scriptures, that God, the great fact and mystery of the universe, is at the same moment and by the necessities of existence, Unity, Duality, and Trinity. 2. — It may be said, however, that neither of 46 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. these great expressions standing alone, pregnant as they are with a deep and divine meaning, can con- vey to us the full idea of that wonderful being whom we call God. But taken in connection with each other and with Personality as the basis of their ap- plication, they open views of the Infinite, which the exploration of ages would not fully satisfy. We shall treat of them in the order in which they have been named. Of the first affirmation, namely, the Unity of the divine Nature, we shall have but little comparatively to say, because it is a subject on which much has been ably written, and is one which to thinking and philosophic minds is but little short of self-evident. The argument on the subject is commonly and very justly drawn from the evidences of oneness of design in the multiplied objects of creation. 3. — There is a foundation for the argument from creation, because creation implies the fact of a crea- tor, and because, looking at these objects in the light of their logical relation, creation does not con- tain anything which did not antecedently exist in the ideas of the creating Mind, so that creation, ex- isting in the universe of objects around us, may justly be regarded as the out-going, the reflex, or if it be preferred, the shadows of the Infinite. And accord- ingly what God is in the eternal principles of his GOD AS UNITY AND DUALITY. 47 nature, including his Unity, is written not merely in the messages of Prophets and Apostles, but in his out-goings, in the emanations of Himself which ex- ist in the things that are made, in the great robe of created forms and life which hangs as a garment around the brightness of his essential being. And there, as we read in accordance with the laws of our mental beings the multiplied facts of emanated or created existence, which are expressions of the one- ness of thought and plan that lie hidden in the Source or Centre from which they come, our convic- tions become harmonized and consolidated in a par- ticular direction ; and at last it is impossible for us to doubt the Unity of that great Creative Centre. We cannot dwell, nor do we feel it to be necessary, upon the specific processes of thought by which this is done. Nevertheless, Unity is the first word in the divine alphabet ; and Nature, speaking in her silent voices, and writing her record in the book of the Absolute Religion, harmonizes with the Scrip- tures in saying, God is ONE God. 4. — But this is not the only or the final word in the great facts of God's existence. We proceed therefore to say, without however, confidently ex- pecting an equal unanimity of opinion in regard to it, that the Divine Nature is dual, or two-fold, at the same time that it is one. This great mystery in the 4 8 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. nature of the Divine Being is rendered possible by the great fact of Personality, which has this pecu- liarity, that, while it necessarily implies and in- cludes existence, it may be regarded as something more than existence, because it is a fixed and dis- criminated modification of existence. The unity is in the existence ; the duality which attaches to the same existence, and can never yield its claim to it, reveals itself in that real and indestructible modifi- cation of existence — that elemental fact of the uni- verse, not easily explained, but which can never be ignored,— called Personality. It is upon this basis that the Absolute Religion, which cannot interpret itself independently of existing facts, harmonizes with the Scriptures in breaking up the desolateness of Unity and proclaiming the two-foldness or duality of the Divine Nature. And if we will but open our eyes, so significant are the facts that have relation to it, we cannot fail to see at least some evidences of it. 5. — Some of the facts upon which our conclusions are founded are these : In every form or kind of existence which comes fully within the limits of human knowledge, we find that each form, while it is discriminated from every other form, reveals within the prescribed limits of its own existence the won- derful combination of unity of nature with a two- GOD . / S UNIT Y AND D UALIT Y. ^ foldncss or duality in the constitution of that nature. Take our common humanity as an example. No one can well deny that humanity is one in nature or being, while at the same time, without abrogating in any degree its unity and identity of nature, it is dualistic in personality. Man is not woman and woman is not man, and yet neither man nor woman is out of the limits of humanity. They stand re vealed, to the comprehension of all true and candid judgment, forever one in the essential identicalness of being or nature, and yet forever discriminated by facts and relations which make them two in one. And our argument is, that God, in revealing this great fact in everything that is made, has revealed, in connection with the primal and essential unity in his own existence, the additional fact of duality. In other words, God is both Fatherhood and Mother- hood. To the mind impelled by the laws of its own being, that intuitionally accepts the great fact of Causation, and can read the inherent nature of the cause in the facts that flow from it, this, I think, is the inevitable conclusion. And from the eternal Fatherhood and Motherhood, furnishing, in their co- existent and co-operative duality, the only conceiva- ble basis of such a result, all things proceed. 6. — But is there anything in the Scriptures, any- 50 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. thing in the common and generally accepted forms of religious thought and feeling which harmonizes with this view? It may, perhaps, be admitted that the Scriptures are not very full or very explicit on this subject, and yet there are some things that favor what has been said. It is worthy of notice, that in the very earliest part of the Bible there are expres- sions which clearly intimate a plurality, not, indeed, in the essential nature, but in the personalities of the Godhead. The Hebrew word ELOHIM, which often occurs as the name of the Supreme Being, and which is translated God, is in the plural form. In the ac- count which is given in the first, third, and eleventh chapters of Genesis of God's early doings, he is represented as conversing with another, and in such a way as to convey the idea of more than one divine personality. It is a part of this early history that God made man in his own image ; and yet it seems to be obvious from what follows that the man who was thus created contained in himself a combination of male and female elements, which either consti- tuted, or was destined subsequently to constitute, a duality of persons. And it may be remarked in this connection that the intermingling of the plural pro- nouns us and our with the singular pronouns he and his, when God himself is the subject of discourse, as in Genesis i. : 26, 27, may be regarded as natural or GOD IS UNI TY AND D UA LI TV. 51 at least explainable, on the supposition of a plurality of persons; but not otherwise. 7. — In the book of Proverbs, the authorship of which is generally, and probably with justice, ascri- bed to Solomon, the second Personality, as it is sometimes called by writers, or that personality which indicates the maternal element and power of the Godhead, is understood by many commentators, especially those of a deeply intuitive and devout cast of mind, to be announced under the name of Wis- dom, called in the Greek Septuagint translation, SO- PHIA. " Wisdom," or the " Divine Sophia,'' is rep- resented in the eighth chapter of the book, as lifting up her voice, as standing in the top of high places, as crying aloud at the entrance of the city gates. The character of the language is so remarkable in some parts of the chapter, that it is certainly difficult to explain it on the ground merely of figurative forms of expression. " By me," says Wisdom, " kings reign and princes decree justice. By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth/' And again, in language which reminds one of what is said of the Wisdom or Logos in John's gospel, " The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his ways, before the works of old." And again, " There I was by him as one brought up with him ; 52 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him." Prov. 8: 15, 16, 23, 30. I am aware that different and somewhat con- flicting interpretations have been given by learned men to this portion of Proverbs. The reader who wishes to go into a minute examination of it, which our limits and the pressure of numerous topics will not permit us to do, will find valuable aids in the 15th volume of the Bibliotheca Sacra, in a very able and exhaustive article, in support of the position that Wisdom in these passages is a divine Personal- ity, by Professor Barrows, of Andover. We find evidence also, that the doctrine of a du- ality in the Godhead, and of a Wisdom or Maternal principle, existed widely among the Jews, from vari- ous passages in that portion of the Jewish writings which are regarded by the Protestants as apocryphal. In the apocryphal book, entitled the Wisdom of Solomon, written about one hundred years before Christ, and in the Greek language, the SOPHIA or Wisdom is repeatedly introduced, and in such a way as to indicate personality. In the 9th chapter, 4th verse, it is said, " Give me the SOPHIA [or Wisdom] which sitteth by thy throne" At the ninth verse, she is represented as being present with God when he made the world. And I think it is worthy of notice, that in the 1st and 2d verses of the 9th chapter, So- GOD IS UNITY AND DC/A II TV. 53 phia or Wisdom is used as a parallel expression, and as synonymous with Logos. It is the same in the 12th verse of the 16th chapter. Similar passages, and which have been understood, to some extent, as indicating a Motherhood or maternal personality in the Divine Nature, are found also in the apocry- phal book, entitled, the Wisdom of the Son of Si- rach. 9. — In the Jewish Cabala, or traditional script- ural commentary, which began to be collected some years before the coming of Christ, there are eviden- ces of such a belief. Mrs. Child, in a work entitled " The Progress of Religious Ideas,'' has made refer- ence to this fact in a passage near the commence- ment of her second volume. " According to the cabalistic doctrine," she says, " God was pure, un- created light, existing by the necessity of its own nature, filling the immensity of space, and contain- ing within itself the principle of life and motion. The souls of all beings were portions of Him, and had existed in Him. All forms of being were mere- ly manifestations of his eternal, indwelling ideas. The Wisdom of the Eternal they supposed to be a feminine deity, whom they called SOPHIA." 10. — The most satisfactory announcement, how- ever, on this deeply interesting subject, is that which occurs in the generally recognized Scriptures ; and 54 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. is to be found in the first chapter of John's Gospel. To understand its full force, we must keep in mind, what I think a careful and critical examination will fully justify, the identity of the Logos and the Sophia. " In the beginning was the Logos or Word ; and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." ■ In other words ; God, the great positive principle of the universe, the divine Personality, which is char- acterized especially by the attributes of power and causation, existed in the beginning, and as the ante- cedent of all created things. But He had a com- panion ; He did not exist alone. The Word or Lo- gos, the Wisdom or Sophia, different expressions for the same principle of Eternal Life, was with Him. And the Logos was God ; not only with God, but was God. ii. — An Infinite Love, existing as a positive per- sonality, implies and requires, as the complement to its own nature, a correspondent existence, receptive of whatever it is able to communicate ; in other words, an Infinite Beloved. On no other supposition can we understand how the wants of its affectional na- ture, for we cannot suppose that God is destitute of such a nature, can be met. The personality of the infinite Love, which is characterized by the attributes of causation and power, would fail in the great pur- poses of being, and thus would essentially destroy GOD IS UNIT Y A ND DUAIITY. 55 itself, if — speaking after the imperfect manner of men — it were not enfolded in the arms of the Eter- nal Wisdom, the Logos, the Sophia. Such, in the somewhat mystic words of the Apostle John, words liable, perhaps, to be misunderstood or perverted, but nevertheless significant of a truth of heavenly beauty, is the announcement of the infinite Pater- nit)' and the Infinite Motherhood. Undoubtedly the language of John, like every- thing else that takes the imperfect form of words, is susceptible of criticism. We are aware there are those who are of opinion that the expressions he employs can be explained on the ground that the Logos is the name of an attribute merely, and not of a personality. But it must be admitted, I think, especially when all the facts brought to notice in the various passages are carefully compared, that such an explanation is not the most natural and obvious one. 12. — The thought, which finds its expression in the fact of celestial maternity, makes its appearance in other quarters. The word Logos, as applicable to God, and used in a way to indicate, in the opinion of many, a divine personality, is found in the writ- ings of Philo of Alexandria, a learned Jew, who wrote a number of works in Greek previous to the time of John. According to a statement to be 56 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. found in the Critical Greek Testament of Dr. Alford, Philo identifies the Logos with the Sophia, using the terms as convertible ; a circumstance of a good deal of interest in connection with the history of the use of these terms. It is worthy of remark, also, that the Logos, as the Eternal Reason, and spoken of in such a way as to imply, if not directly affirm, person- ality, has a place in the writings of Plato. It is not necessary to suppose, however, that John, who leaned on Jesus' bosom, and learned sympathetic- ally, as well as in other forms of instruction, the great truths that had their lodgement there, derived his views, as some have conjectured, from either Plato or Philo. He had other and higher sources of knowledge. Nor is it necessary to suppose with Dr. Adam Clarke on the other hand, although there are some facts which look in that direction, that Plato derived his knowledge on this subject, to whatever extent it may have existed, either directly or in- directly from the Jews. There is reason to believe that many of the leading philosophers of Greece, including Socrates, Plato, Pythagoras and Zeno in the number, were true and earnest seekers after moral and religious truth. And it is true of all men in all ages of the world — not an accident but an eternal principle — that they who seek in sim- plicity and sincerity of spirit shall not fail to find, GOD IS UNITY AND DUALITY. 57 Scholars well understand, and perhaps more fully so at the present time than at any antecedent period, that there are rtiany thoughts and sugges- tions in the doctrines and writings of Socrates and Plato, in particular, which harmonize well with the doctrines of the Scriptures. The same infinite Mind, which has never ignored its children in any coun- try or in any age, may have been the source of knowledge in both cases. 13. — The doctrine under consideration makes its appearance from time to time subsequently to the time of Christ and his immediate successors. It is found for instance, in the writings of the learned Valentinus, who lived in the second century, a Jew by birth, but educated in Alexandria, and subse- quently resident in Rome. He regarded the Su- preme Being, in the first or earliest aspect in which he presents himself, as a great Primal Essence, a sort of unfathomable Abyss of Existence, an im- measurable ocean of life. His vast primal Existence cither gradually develops itself, or manifests itself connaturally and from the beginning, as Aeons or Powers, which, as they were far removed according to Neander, " from abstract notional attributes," were probably regarded by Valentinus in the light of Personalities. And these appear to be repre- sented as complements or correspondences to each 3* 53 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. other, namely, as Positive or Causative on the one hand, and as Receptive on the other. He speaks of the Aeon Sophia, or the Eternal Wisdom, as unfolding itself, though at first weakly and imper- fectly, as the designing or contriving mind of the universe ; in other words the fashioning or artistic power. It at last incarnates itself in Christ, who in his human nature is the highest finite out-birth ; the beginning or Elder Brother of a great family, who may be expected to inherit the truth and purity which, in his human nature, were manifested in him. The doctrine of Valentinus is undoubtedly in many respects complex and obscure ; and these few sentences which give the most favorable aspect, necessarily impart a very imperfect idea of it. But all that it is important here to know is, that it recognizes in the Divine Nature the fact of innate or connatural powers and personalities, which may be regarded as distinct and self-conscious in their manifestations, though having a common basis of existence, and also as being correspondent and com- plementary as Positive and Receptive, as Father- hood and Motherhood.* 14. — Other writers, among whom Heracleon and Barsanides may be particularly named, who lived * See Neander's History of the Christian Religion and Church. Vol. I. Ait on Valentine and his School. GOD IS UNITY AA r D DUALITY. 59 subsequently to Valentinus, may be regarded as sympathizing with him, and as being essentially of the same school of religious thought. Not unfrequently they apply the term SopJiia, or Wisdom (the term adopted by all these writers from the Greek version of the striking passage in the bo.ok of Proverbs, which has already been named), in such a way, and in such connected epithets, as not only to indicate the fact of personality, but that divine and eternal relation of Fatherhood and Motherhood to which our attention in this chapter is particularly directed. The doctrine is found in Clement of Alexandria, who also lived subsequently to Valentinus, and whose views of religious truth were in other respects somewhat different. 15. — In coming down to later times we find inti- mations of the doctrine under consideration in the writings possessing far more depth and value than is commonly supposed, of the Mystics and Quietists. Suso, one of the truly devout and learned German Mystics of the fourteenth century wrote a work which he entitled " The Book of Eternal Wisdom." Suso recognized the common doctrine on the subject, chat this living and personal principle, the divine SOPHIA of the Greek mode of expression and the " La Sagesse Eternelle" as he calls it in the French, the eternal LOGOS or Wisdom, that dwelt with God 60 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. and was God, bowed itself to the sphere of our err- ing humanity, and became incarnated in Jesus of Nazareth. And he expressly teaches, near the close of the first chapter, that we have a knowledge in its higher or pre-existent state by means of the knowl- edge which we have of Christ in his lower or incar- nate nature. WISDOM speaks, " If thou wouldst contemplate me," she says " in my ineffable Divinity, thou must gain a knowledge of me in my suffering humanity," a declaration which contains volumes of true knowledge. It is difficult to read the work to which we have referred, without recognizing in it the deep conviction on the part of the writer, of a Personality in the Divine Nature, of the same essen- tiality of being, with God and of God, and yet enti- tled to be characterized by that attribute of Mother- hood, without which the infinite Fatherhood, dear as it is, becomes a misnomer and a nullity, Suso lived in the fifteenth century. At an earlier period in the twelfth century, Richard of the Abbey of St. Victor in Paris used expressions which involve the same doctrine. 1 6. At a later period Jacob Boehmen, a Mystic, though in some respects differing from the school of Suso and Tauler recognized the doctrine of the Di- vine Motherhood. We can make nothing else of his frequent mention of the " Virgin Sophia," whom he GOD IS UNITY A ND D UA II TY. 6 1 describes in various passages as the " Divine Wis- dom," as " Eternal," and as a " Living Essentiality." If we understand him rightly, it was the Sophia, the Wisdom or Maternal ESSENTIA or Personality of the Godhead, which incarnated itself in Christ, and which caused him, in a mother's Spirit though in a male form, to endure his great sufferings in behalf of a world which was to be born into a saved and regen- erated life of him and through him. Not unfre- quently the language of Christ, when it is allowed to enter and to leave its true impress on the interiors of the soul, has the sound and import of a mother's language : " Oh, Jerusalem, Jerusalem," he exclaims with true maternal feeling, "how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gath- ereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" — Matt. 23: 37. The language which he utters on the cross is the very language of a loving mother, who is willing to suffer and even die for her erring children, if she can thereby bring them back to their father's house and to truth. " Father, for- give them, for they know not what they do." 17. A few centuries ago, a sect came into exist- ence in Holland and England, who took the name of Familists, or Family of Love. Some years later, there appeared in England a sect whose views were similar in some leading respects to those of the Fam- 62 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. ilists, who took the name of Philadelphians. In some of the writings which originated in these religious movements, we find evidence of the same tendency to recognize the Maternal Principle as a true and distinct Personality in the Godhead. One of these works is entitled u The Great Crisis/' published anonymously, but generally ascribed to a pious and learned man by the name of Roach. References to the subject which we have been considering, will be found in (t The Great Crisis,'' on pages 93, 94, and 95. Roach, as is common with all these writers, speaks of the Motherhood of the Infinite, under the name of the " Virgin Sophia.'' His language, in the pages referred to and in other places, is somewhat obscure, as if he hesitated to give a clear announce- ment to views which would be likely to meet with much opposition ; but on a careful examination of them, there seems to be no doubt as to his meaning. On page 93 we find the following passage: "That the doctrine of the Sophia, or Wisdom of God, as represented in the Virgin nature or Female property, is no new thing, will appear from what Solomon has written so peculiarly of her, and from Christ's own expressions, Luke 7: 35." The passage in Luke is this : " But Wisdom is justified of all her children.'' Wisdom here, as Roach understands it and explains it in a brief remark, is the Eternal Mother. And GOD IS UNITY AND DUALITY. 63 then, speaking of the doctrine farther, he immedi- ately adds, " Nor has it been without peculiar regard in the writings, also, of the ancient Fathers, though by them more generally applied to the Divine Wis- dom as derivative in the Son (a meaning which is good and true in its place). But the sense of the Primitive Church, as taking it in the superior sense also, [namely as applicable to the Sophia or Pre-ex- istent Christ] appears from that noted passage of Tertullian versus Hermogenenem, cap. iv." This passage, which Roach understands as sustaining his views, he quotes and comments upon. 18. — As we approach nearer our own times, we find the same view taken. It differs, it will be no- ticed, from the generally received view chiefly in go- ing a step farther and indicating, though of course very imperfectly, the nature of the relations existing. The doctrine that the " second person of the Trinity as it is frequently denominated by writers, sustains a relation which may properly be expressed by the term Motherhood, is recognized in the views and writings of the sect of the United Society of Believ- ers commonly called Shakers. In the " Summary View," so called, which is published under the au- thority of the Society, and contains a brief exposition of their doctrines, it is said, p. 219, speaking of Ann Lee, that the imaere and likeness of the Eternal 64 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. Mother was formed in her as the first-born daughter. And again it is said on the same page, that the " hu- man tabernacle of Ann Lee," meaning her earthly body, "was but flesh and blood like those of all other women ; but it was a chosen vessel, occupied as an instrument by the Spirit of Christ ; " that is to say, by the same pure and celestial Spirit which dwelt in Christ. " It is this Spirit/' it is afterward said, " which is the image and likeness of the Eternal Mother r At page 217 it is remarked in relation to Christ, it was " necessary that the human tabernacle of Jesus should be created by the immediate opera- tion of the Eternal Father and Mother." 19. — The doctrine, that the Divine Nature is dual in its personalities, and that this duality implies and includes the fact of a divine maternity, is adopt- ed and advocated by the sect known as Bible Com- munists. The leading doctrines of this people are found in a work entitled the Berean ; a work which is characterized by acuteness of thought and reason- ing, and by no small share of biblical learning. " We believe," says the author of this work in his Preface, in the Duality of the Godhead ; and that Duality, in our view, is imaged in the twofold per- sonality of the first man, who was made male and female, Gen. 1 : 27. The doctrine is brought out more fully in the chapter on the Divine GOD IS UNITY AND DUALITY. 6$ Nature. On page 87 are the following expressions : " For our part, instead of having any repugnance against the idea that God is a bi-personal Being [that is, one in essential nature, but distinct and correlative in dual personalities] we find all our natural prepos- sessions in its favor. We are quite willing that the indications of the created universe should be true ; that woman, as well as man, should have her arche- type in the primary sphere of existence ; that the Receptive as well as the Active principle, subordi- nation as well as power, should have its representa- tive in the Godhead. And we believe that an un- sophisticated child would much prefer the family idea of a dual head over all, a Father and Mother of the universe, to the conception of a solitary God." 20. — We will only add further, that the Catholic Church is often regarded, with how much reason we will not undertake to say, as embodying the idea of the Motherhood element which exists in the Infi- nite, in its recognition of the holy or dcific nature of Mary, the mother of Jesus, and in the high hon- ors, and even worship, which it is understood to render to her. In the paintings of the great mas- ters, which often adorn the Catholic churches, and particularly the Cathedrals, the admiring and tearful eye of the worshipper often rests with the deepest reverence and hope upon that benign countenance, 66 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. which becomes to the eye of faith the imperfect and yet beautiful symbol of the great and overshadow- ing Maternity, which exists innate and glorious in the Godhead. 21. — Such appears to be the new and dawning thought of the world on this important subject ; at first but dimly appearing in the Scriptures ; but in accordance with the promise of the great Teacher, who said, " when the Spirit of truth is come he will guide you into all truth/' revealed at last with clear- er and ever-increasing distinctness by the Holy Spirit, or Spirit of God, or Spirit of universal truth and love, finding its way into and operating intelli- gently and effectively in the hearts of humble and sincere men ; and thus unfolding in these latter days the great and eternal facts which harmonize with and which sustain the progress of humanity. It is with interest therefore, in opening the vol- umes of a remarkable man, the late Theodore Par- ker, who accepted the doctrines of the Absolute Re- ligion while he demurred vigorously to some of the positions of dogmatic theology, that we find him not only announcing God as the primal, unific, and causative principle of things, but also defending the truth, hardly less essential and important, of the Personality of God, and announcing still further, GOD IS UNITY AND DUALITY. 67 with a boldness and clearness indicative of the strength of his convictions, the duality of the Di- vine Nature as being Motherhood as well as Fath- erhood. CHAPTER VI. The Son of God. I. — The duality of the Divine Existence, involv- ing- the fact of Fatherhood and Motherhood, neces- sitates that further unfoldment of being, which is implied in, and is not inappropriately expressed by, the word Trinity. Around this grand and historic word, which alternately attracts and repels by the greatness of the mystery involved in it, the world's thought and the world's controversy have for ages revolved. As it is not our object, however, to dis- cuss religious truths in the precisions of their estab- lished dogmatic forms, but rather as they present themselves in their necessary facts and relations to the enlighted view of the whole human mind, we leave the Trinity, as one of the generally accepted methods of expression, to complete and verify itself by its own logical processes, and in its own time and way. 2. — But before proceeding further, I think it will be necessary briefly to say something of a personal THE SON OF GOD. 69 nature, in order to a proper understanding of my own position, and as explanatory in part of my own tendencies of thought. I hope the reader will bear with me and sympathize, when I say that I am a believer in, and a lover of the biblical Scrip- tures. I frankly and joyfully acknowledge, that I have found in them not only an enlightening, but I trust something of a positive and renovating power. At the same time I am obliged to say further, that under the influence of inward suggestions, which I will not stop to explain and define, I have thought it right and felt it a duty, to compare the moral and religious revelations embodied in the Bible with the moral and religious thought of different ages and nations. I wished to ascertain in this way, and with the aid of the histories of philosophical opin- ions, the relation of the Scriptures to the moral wants and the enlightenment of universal humanity. And in the fulfilment of these desires, I have not only examined the Scriptures to some extent in the original languages, but have trodden the soil of Pal- estine, which may be regarded as a living commen- tary ; and have verified, or attempted to verify, so far as illustration and verification can now come from those sources, the Scriptural affirmations in the birth-place of their origin ; — in Nazareth and Bethlehem, on the banks of the Jordan, in the sacred - ABSOLUTE RELIGI places of Jerusalem, in the terrible deserts and on the rocky summits of Sinai. And not only this : I have read, as many others have done, the truth of the declarations of the Bible in the direct as well as the comparative history of nations, and in the rec- ords of my own heart. And therefore, without for- getting the intelligence and the conclusions of oth- ers, I frankly affirm that the Bible is no fable to me. I have no hesitancy in saying, that in my view, subject to the condition of a candid and wise interpretation, the Bible is the affirmation of the highest intelligence, and is the eternal ,k Word of God." 3. — But there is another view, which it would be unwise and unphilosophical to omit. I remember also, that God is not only the God of the Bible, but the God of all nature, and of all history, and of all things. And so much so that He cannot be sepa- rated without the denial of the essential elements of his nature from any thing and every thing which exists ; but on the contrary is found to be and can- not possibly be otherwise than universal, unchange- able, and eternal in all that He is, in all that He does, and in all that He utters. And it is, there- fore, I believe, that the word of God in his Reveal- ed Religion, known as the Bible or Scriptures, and the word of God in the Absolute Religion, when in- THE SOX OF GOD. - i tcrprctcd in the true and divine light of things, are and must be the same. It is possible that men may fail to harmonize the two but the harmony ex- 4. — It is well known that theologians, looking perhaps with the theologic eye, have found a Trin- ity in the Bible. We do not say that they have always understood or expressed it rightly; or that their views, often divergent from each other, are always entitled to assent. Nevertheless it is the general testimony of their writings and creeds that they have succeeded in finding it there ; at least in the essential nature of the thing. And such is my own belief. And it is not surprising to me that God, whose wisdom always adapts itself in its exer- cise to the existing state of things, communicated this great truth, in the early periods of the world, in the dogmatic form and simply as a doctrine and not as a philosophy. As thus stated, and standing by itself alone, it is not free from obscurity ; and there is a class of minds which do not readily accept it. But the God of the Bible is the God of univer- sal nature. And it is not strange that in these lat- ter days, with all the enlightenment of arts and let- ters and of moral and religious progress, some of the obscurities of the Bible are explained and reconciled by the light of the Absolute Religion. m 2 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. 5. — To the thoughtful mind it is a natural sug- gestion, that the duality of the Divine Existence, written everywhere in the book of nature, necessi- tates a Trinity. The train of thought in the case is essentially this. It is not only true, as the apostle Paul teaches us, but it is a truth which harmonizes with the nature and position of man who reasons constantly from effects to causes, that we learn the things of God from the things that exist. In other words, the effect in the principles and methods of its being, is antecedently in the cause. And what do we find in the effect? In the first place it pre- sents itself as a duality. But it does not stop there. We always find that the out-birth of that which in the order of nature goes before, supplementing and carrying out the fact of duality, in other words the added fact which constitutes the Trinity, every- where manifests itself in the objects of the world around us. Everywhere there is a duality of exist- ence, resulting in a reproduction which constitutes a trinity. But the things which exist, and which necessarily carry with them the evidence of the highest wisdom, are but the reflex or the mirror of the great First Cause from which they came. The cause holds the effect in its arms and stamps its image upon it. And thus the duality which in the objects of nature around us always implies and ne- THE SON OF GOD. . 73 cessitatcs the fact of a Trinity, reveals in the light of the relation of effects and causes, the antecedent but correspondent fact, not only of the duality but also of the tri-unity of the Infinite. 6. — If we are right therefore in the view which we take, we must supplement the eternal Fatherhood and Motherhood by the eternal Son. The eternal Son, or the Son " eternally proceeding," as it is some- times theologically expressed, is the great and un ceasing out-birth of the Divine Duality. That which being in God, is necessarily in its appropriate time born out ^/"God, is the Son of God. But the Son of God is a wide and mighty form of expression wnich, in order to embrace the whole truth included in it, may be presented to our notice, first, generi- cally or in its most general form ; and second, specifi- cally or in relation to that remarkable manifestation of the divine in the human, (undoubtedly the most remarkable fact in human or any other history) which is known as both Son of God and Son of Man. 7. — Generically, or considered in the whole of its extent, the trinal out-birth, otherwise called the Son of God, without which the eternal Fatherhood and Motherhood could have neither name nor power nor meaning, is the whole of creation from its lowest to its highest form. Spoken of in terms suggested by the analogy of the human form, which in some 4 74 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. respects may be regarded as the physical similitude and outward portraiture of God, the myriads of ex- istences which form the lowest stratas or divisions of beings, constitute the FEET ; the highest develop- ments and classifications of existence constitute the head ; and the intermediate grades, all in their ap- propriate places and fulfilling their appropriate offi- ces, make out and manifest the completeness and beauty of this boundless and unceasing out-birth or generation of positive and separate life. 8. — So that not an insect that floats in the air, nor a fish that swims in the sea, nor a bird that sings in the forests, nor a wild beast that roams on the mountains ; not one is or by any possibility can be shut out and excluded from the meaning and the fact of the divine Sonship, considered in this generic or universal sense. Under that significant and glorious name in its generic and widest import are included all possible forms and degrees of being, whatever may be their distinctive character, which sustain the relation of effect or createdness to the great Causative Centre which lies hidden in what may be called the Dual Infinite. And this Sonship of universal existence, though it undoubtedly sus- tains the relation of effect to cause, is nevertheless so closely and indissolubly interwoven with the Eter- nal source from which it springs, that it may, in a THE SON OF GOD. 75 proximate but most important sense, be said of it, that it is without beginning and without end ; that no time in its specific measurement is allowed to mark its commencement and that no time, unless the same can be said of God himself, can announce the hour of its termination. It is what theologians, with a just and significant expression, have some- times called it, the eternal Sonship, or a Sonship in eternal procession. In other words, in the two-fold bosom of the Dual Infinite there exists a Sonship, which identical in nature but discriminated in per- sonality, converts two-foldness into tri-foldness, du- ality into trinity, and of which it can be said in its objective manifestation it is always being born, and in the mystery of its subjective existence it is always in the bosom of its eternal birthplace and always in readiness to be born. 9. — All living nature then in all the variety of its forms, being only the out-birth of that which has existed interiorly and subjectively from eternity, is the mighty procession of form, feeling and activity which, in virtue of its birth-place, constitutes the Son of God. And in this vast complexity of Son- ship, including all possible degrees and forms and methods of being, there is not a living thing that is forgotten, not one that is not overshadowed by the j 6 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. divine Love. All sheep and oxen, and the cattle upon a thousand hills, and the young lions of the forest, and the fishes of the sea, and the birds of the air, as they could not be born and exist without God, have a right to be called the children of God. " Are not five sparrows sold for two farthings, and not one of them is forgotten before God," " thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn," " thou givest them their meat in due season," — it is such expressions as these which show the loving heart of the Infinite. And little does that man know of the greatness and boundlessness of God's universal love whose heart is not touched with the deepest sympathy for everything that exists, no matter what it is or where it is. If we are one with God we are one in all we can do to contribute to the happiness of everything God has made. 10. — But again and specifically the Sonship, which constitutes and completes the divine Unity, not only in Duality but in Trinity, so that we can speak of the oneness of Eternal Life in the three-foldness of Personality and relations, the One in Three and the Three in one, is found in Man. Not man how- ever, in the first form of life, not the self-centred and limited Adamic man, (a subject on which we shall have something explanatory to say in another THE SON OF GOD. 77 place ;) but man with the experience of the second or higher birth, which expands the self-centred into the universal-centred and God-like form of life ; man standing at the head and as the comprehension and the perfection of all lower existences; man who cannot separate his own life and happiness from the life and happiness of all other beings, man in his glorious Christhood. This is Sonship in the specific and higher sense ; the fulfilment of the prayer and hope of the long expectant ages; the culmination of humanity in the Son of the virgin Mother. 1 1. — I stand with awe in the presence of this great out-birth. The true man was born : the effulgent model and ante-type of the incoming, heavenly hu- manity ; and becoming the dwelling-place of God, he embodied the glory of divinity in the humbleness of the human form ; and in virtue of that which was within Him, took the name in the specific and more jjlorious sense of the term of the Son of God. I shall be pardoned for saying it is my earnest prayer, that I may understand more and more this great advent known specifically as the divine Son. I do not believe that a true philosophy has any sympa- thy with that perversity of spiritual perception which turns coldly away from this divine brightness. The expression which better than any other meets my thoughts, and which in the comprehension of its 7$ ABSOLUTE RELIGION. meaning reveals the evidence of its divine origin is, "God manifest in the flesh." Being not only made in the similitude of man, but being the possessor of a man's nature, we do not find him as he is histori- cally represented, exempt from human weaknesses and trials, temptations and sorrows. In what sense therefore, is it possible to speak of him as the mani- festation of God ? This is a great question. With a view to the better understanding of it, we leave the subject here until we shall have considered in the next chapter the necessity and possibility of a divine manifestation. CHAPTER VII. Necessity and Possibility of a Divine Manifestation. I. — Religion, considered in its essential nature, and in the aspect of its great and final result, is and must be harmony with God. Reason as we may upon the subject, it will be found in the end, that it cannot be anything greater, nor anything less, nor anything different from this. But harmony, admit- ting there is a slight difference in the import of the terms, necessarily implies union ; and indeed might properly be defined as the completion or per- fection of union ; and in the case of intelligent and moral beings, it is hardly necessary to say that it is and must be conscious union. 2. — And now we proceed to say further, that there cannot be a conscious union, especially one which rises to the eminent degree which entitles it to be called harmony, without a knowledge of God. In other words, in order to this result of harmony which is the substance of religion, God must make himself known, must manifest himself. To be con- 80 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. sciously united with God and yet without a knowl- edge of God is a contradiction in terms, and is a moral impossibility. And further/if God is not to be manifested in such a way as to make himself known, what is the object of his existence? Why should he exist at all ? The manifestation of God therefore, in some important respect, so that we can speak of him intelligently and give him both thought and affection, may be regarded as a NECESSITY. 3. — So far as this, the Absolute philosophy ex- presses itself with confidence. And the human heart, that which in man feels rather than thinks, but which embodies truth in the instincts of feeling, confirms the decision. But here comes a difficulty. Granting that it is necessary in the decisions of the human intellect, granting that it is necessary to meet the conscious wants of human feeling, is it a thing which is possible ? Is it possible for the Infinite to manifest itself understanding^ to the finite? Or taking the converse proposition, is it possible for the finite, in the limitation of its powers, to compre- hend that which is without limits? In the view of sound reason it seems to be necessary to answer these questions in the negative. But it appears to have escaped very much the thoughts and knowledge of men, that infinity is not God but only the mode or manner of his existence, namely, the extent or DIVINE MANIFESTATION. gl degree of his existence ; and that we may know God in the essentiality of his nature, in that which con- stitutes the primal and deific substance of his being, although it may be true, and is true, that we cannot know Him on account of the limitations of our pow- ers in the fullness of his extent or degree. In other words, if we cannot know God in his degree or meas- urement, we may still know him, which is of far greater importance, in his truth or essence. 4. — But let us look a little further. If infinity is not God but only the degree or extent of his exist- ence, the question still remains, — what are we to understand by God, and what is it which constitutes the primality and essence of his being ? Do we or can we find Him in the true and higher sense in his attributes ? Let us reflect a moment on this impor- tant question. Take the attribute of knowledge, even when it is considered in the degree or extent of infinitude, and is properly denominated Omnisci- ence, does it make or constitute God ? Sound rea- son will also be compelled to answer here in the negative. And again, God is a being of power. But does the attribute of power, even when joined in its extent with infinitude and denominated Om- nipotence, any more than the attribute of omnisci- ence make or constitute God? And here also we are compelled to answer, that such cannot possibly 4* g 2 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. be the case. The word attribute itself, which men agree in using as applicable to and as descriptive in part of omniscience and omnipotence, implies that in the order of nature there is and must be a prin- ciple back of these, a living and pre-eminent primal- ity which will call knowledge and power into action and give them and all other attributes their appro- priate direction and issues. And this principle which, as we have already seen in a former chapter, is the essential and eternal life of the divine exist- ence, and in fact constitutes that existence, is LOVE. And this interior principle which constitutes the es- sential nature of God and to which are appended the attributes that operate as the instruments of its decrees, involves in itself and as a part of its own nature, an ultimate motive power which is the basis of the activity of the universe. If it were otherwise, in other words if there were a destitution and ab- sence of such motive power, constituting a state of things which could properly be described by the word indifference, then of course all the existing wonderful activities would cease, and God would be practically annihilated. And again, if this interior principle of which we speak were not indifference but a practical or motive evil principle, then, instead of God we should have and it could not be other- wise, an infinite Satan. But the Absolute philoso- DI VINE MA NIFE S TA TION. 8 3 phy affirms as well as the Bible and in confirmation of the Bible, not merely that God exists but that God is Love. And hence it will be found, and all exhaustive and ultimate researches will prove it to be so, that every exercise of his omniscience and omnipotence or other attributes is dictated by be- neficence. 5. — The manifestation of himself therefore, which it was necessary for God to make, and which the wants of an erring- and suffering humanity required, and which the Absolute Religion aiming as it does at the establishment of universal harmony impera- tively demands, was the manifestation of himself in his essential nature as Love. The manifestation of the auxiliary incidents or at- tributes of the Divine Nature, such as knowledge and power, and especially with the weight and expansion of infinitude attached to them, when standing alone and without a manifestation of that interior and es- sential life which holds them in its hand and guides them to beneficent issues, was calculated to frighten and destroy and not to save humanity. But in what way could that deeper and more interior man- ifestation of God as Love, which alone could bring adjustment and peace and hope to men be made ? The question which now presents itself was, in some important sense, the great problem of the g^ ABSOLUTE RELIGION. ages. And in the first place all enlightened philoso- phy will agree that it was necessary that it should be made within the sphere of humanity. In other words, it was necessary that it should be made in such a way that man with the limited faculties which he possesses and with precisely such faculties in kind as he possesses, should be able to behold, study and comprehend it. 6. — But something more is necessary than this general statement. Shall we find the manifestation of God in his true and essential nature, as some heathen nations have foolishly thought, in the lower forms of creation, in birds and reptiles, and even in inanimate things ? That such an idea should have existed is indeed an evidence of the wants and crav- ings of the human heart ; and perhaps it would be unphilosophical to deny that there is an element of truth in it, inasmuch as there is something of God in all the creatures of God, however low they may be in the scale of being. But the darkened belief which accepts the manifestation of God in such in- ferior things, a belief to which the Apostle Paul so feelingly and pointedly alludes, cannot contribute to man's elevation; but on the contrary, as appears from the records of heathen nations, tends greatly to hold him fast in hopelessness and debasement. Nor on the other hand, would a manifestation made DIVINE MANIFESTATION. 85 iii the form of beings above the sphere of humanity, through forms and faculties not commensurable with and susceptible of being interpreted by anything given to man, have been of any more avail. It might not have tended to debase, but it is not ob- vious that it could have tended to elevate, because, being above the reach of the human faculties, it could not be understood. There is left, therefore, only the method which infinite wisdom adopted, that of the incarnation of the divine in the human form ; the incarnation of the Son of God ; — " God manifest in the flesh." 7. — And this is a method of manifestation, which does not merely excite our admiration and gratitude ; but which, far more than any other that is possible to be suggested, satisfies our reason. If God is Love, the manifestation would necessarily be in that method which would best secure the results at which love aims. God, therefore, with a condescen- sion which of itself intimates his true nature, took upon himself humanity in order that he might be comprehended by humanity; and that, if he could not be measured in his infinitude, nor be understood in the truth and essentiality of his nature through the incidents of knowledge and power alone, he might be understood by submitting to be nailed to the Cross in that which was and is the essential g5 ABSOLUTE RELIGION. principle of his life ; a principle which gives direction to knowledge and power, and which stamps its value on infinitude. 8. But in the realization of this great event, al- though through the teachings of types and prophe- cies they had long looked for something of this kind, men seem to have been greatly perplexed in one particular. In consequence of the associations which they had been accustomed to attach to rank and station, they expected that the descending God, whose advent the earlier ages had predicted, would make his appearance with all the pomp and circum- stance at least which belong to the highest human station. They looked for a king in the human and historic sense of the term. But that was not God's plan. In his view human existence, aside from the incidents of rank and station, embodies the evidence of the highest wisdom and goodness. Man, who was made in the image of God, man in his sim- ple humanity, unadorned with the incidents which