D ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Brittle Books Project, 2015.COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATION In Public Domain. Published prior to 1923. This digital copy was made from the printed version held by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. It was made in compliance with copyright law. Prepared for the Brittle Books Project, Main Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign by Northern Micrographics Brookhaven Bindery La Crosse, Wisconsin 2015. ^ V THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY 6sSCHOOL ECONOMY: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON THE BEST MODES OF ESTABLISHING AND TEACHING SCHOOLS, AND OF MAKING THEM THOROUGHLY USEFUL TO THE WORKING CLASSES BY MEANS OP MORAL AND INDUSTRIAL TRAINING. BY JELINGER SYMONS, A.B. <✓ LONDON: JOHN W. PARKER AND SON, WEST STRAND. MDCCCLII.London: savill and edwards, printers, chandos street.\ f iJ s 0 vV" TO THE YERY REVEREND RICHARD DAWES, M A. DEAN OF HEREFORD. My dear Sir, ^ I wish I could think this little book in the least degree ^worthy of your sanction. It may, however, serve as r*a means of expressing the gratitude which I, and all friends of real education feel to you, as the exponent of the ^best mode of teaching the poor, and of adapting schools 236 Chapter III. How to make Schools thoroughly useful for Poor Children. IT should be remembered that, in dealing with the educa- tion of children, we are dealing with moral infirmities to be cured, or diseases to be prevented, as well as with bodies and minds to be trained and instructed. That the bulk of our schools have as yet done neither, is sufficiently evident to those who are able and willing (few are both) to inves- tigate their actual condition thoroughly and dispassion- ately. The prejudices against education, though much reduced among the first and second classes of society,* linger very largely among the third class; and a prevalent indifference to it certainly exists among the fourth and fifth classes. A small minority of society thus really cares for, and strives to promote it. The prejudice of the three higher classes arises from a dislike and distrust of its effects, and the indifference of the lower classes from a disbelief of its benefits. What with over- teaching and under-teaching, I regard the prejudice natural, and the indifference inevitable. Education has not been —and what is more, it is not sufficiently—in harmony with the, position of the labouring class, for whom it is designed; nor does it supply them with the information * It is convenient thus to divide them. There is a class, evidently above the middle class (an ambiguous term), often called the aristocracy.. Without defining it too narrowly, it may constitute the first class. Then come the professions, the minor gentry, merchants, &c. The third class comprises tradesmen, yeomen, farmers, &c. (once termed the epicier class, from the French.) The fourth class comprises all independent labourers v and paupers, vagabonds, prostitutes, criminals, See., form the fifth or* dangerous class.TO MAKE SCHOOLS USEFUL FOR POOH CHILDREN. 37 or skill of which they will in after-life stand especially in need. The first objection arises naturally in the mind of those, who judge of the benefit of education by the results of what they hear called by that name. An education radically defective in its chief elements for the most part exists in the country, and its fruits tend rather to evil than to good. Immoralities, insubordination, conceit, disinclination to hard labour and continuous industry, though they are not necessary results of superficial instruction, are promoted by it. Practical experience in country districts teaches the farmer to prefer the labourer or servant who cannot write, simply because he finds that those who can, oftener wrong him than those who cannot. From this frequent fact, he draws a wrong conclusion.# He mistakes reading and writing for education, and attributes evils to its existence which are owing to its absence. It is difficult to convince him that it is not teaching reading and writing that does ihe mischief, but teaching nothing else. Beading and writing and arithmetic, to an educated mind, are as limbs to the body, or sails to the ship; but they can effect, if given alone, nothing for good conduct. They are mecha- nical, not moral elements. They can no more make a good man, than a crucible can make a chemist, or a plough a (ploughman. Hence the practical operation of the system, as I have stated, not only is hurtful to the future lives of the children, but results in discredit to education. It is believed to do more harm than good; and until we are enabled, by better systems and schools, to spread abroad among the people examples of the practical fruits of real education, so that men who thus reason may have proofs of their error be- fore their eyes, it is almost hopeless to wrestle with it effectually. The objection to the education of poor children on38 HOW TO MAKE SCHOOLS USEFUL account of its intrinsic value to them, is mucli the most formidable one to its progress. Often, to convince some people of the good effects of proper education, is to confirm their hostility to its being given to the poor, for fear their children should obtain a start over their superiors. But if the children of class three do not get their due,, that fact is a strong reason for giving it to them with all possible expedition, but assuredly it is none for withholding what is also due from class four. The instruction of the former cannot be furthered by the ignorance of the latter; on the contrary, the instruction of the poorer would be a wholesome stimulus to that of the richer. The ob- jection arises, unfortunately, from the narrowest and most pitiful feeling of our nature—that of selfish pride, and it deserves no quarter. It is indispensable that, in order to make schools for the poor efficient for their pur- pose, we should take it for granted that they ought to be so. The main points which will minister to this end are these :■— First,—To make the children thoroughly understand that which it is most useful for them to learn. Secondly,—To train their morals. Thirdly,—:As far as practicable to train them in industry. The practical means of compassing each of these objects, will be treated of severally. It may be expedient, how- ever, to introduce them by a few general comments. The first point needs no argument. That which is worth doing, is worth doing well; the short-comings on this score have been already noticed, and the subjects taught are often but little better chosen. The great fault is, that the education of the poor is seldom rudimentary enough, and too little attention is paid to the fact, that half the words used in the books they read are entirely strange to them* If these are not explained, instead of being educated theFOR POOR CHILDREN. 39 child is merely exercised in a jargon of words, which im- part neither instruction nor ideas to his mind. The intense love of display which animates so many teachers, induces them to teach higher subjects, and more of them> than can benefit the child, even if he understood them. As regards moral training, it may be conceded that it cannot be successfully given merely in the school-room. Mr. Stow, in his exposition of the admirable system he has adopted in his Glasgow training, observes— Moral training is, of course, practical throughout, and is the main end and object of the whole system in every depart- ment. It comprehends the restraining of all the evil propen- sities of our nature, and, on the contrary, a cultivation of all that is noble and virtuous, founded on Bible training; in other words, on the principles of the immutable standard of revealed truth, and stimulated by its high sanctions and motives. We must here notice a fundamental error in education, which is the confounding of two things essentially distinct. Moral instruction and moral training are generally imagined to mean the same thing; whereas the former is merely the imparting of knowledge, and the latter is the cultivation of the practical habit. On this clear and practical distinction hangs one chief peculiarity of our system. Habits are so important a part of education, and so influential on individuals as well as nations, that we may almost be said to be the children of habit. Proceeding, then, on this idea, how im- portant must early training be before habits are formed, and when we have only evil 'propensities to contend with. A few of the evil propensities and habits may be mentioned, which it is the duty of the trainer to restrain and suppress as they are developed; whether mental, in the school gallery, or practical, in the school play-ground, viz., rudeness, selfishness, deceit, indecency, disorder, evil speaking, cruelty, want of courtesy, anger, revenge, injustice, impatience, covetousness, and dishonesty, so fearfully general in society. On the contrary, all the amiable feelings and christian virtues must be cultivated, such as speaking truth, obedience to parents and all in lawful authority, honesty, justice, forbearance, gene- rosity, gentleness, kindness, fidelity to promises, courteousness, habits of attention, docility, disinterestedness, kindness to inferior animals, pity for the lame and the distressed, and the weak in intellect, and, in general, doing to others as we would wish to be done by.40 HOW TO MAKE SCHOOLS USEFUL Such evil propensities must be subdued, and moral habits formed, not by teaching, but by training. We cannot lecture a child into good manners, or change habits of any kind by the longest speech. The physical, intellectual, or moral habit, is only changed by a succession, or rather by a repetition of doings. This department requires a play-grou?id for moral development and sympathy, as the intellectual department does a gallery for mental sympathy. [ That which Mr. Stow proposes to effect by the play- ground, I would, wherever practicable, endeavour to do by industrial employment. The principle of the system would be the same, embodying the same practical working out of the rules of moral conduct, and the faculties of the moral I being. In the ordinary school-room, little can be done be- ' yond the mere teaching of ethics; this is not moral train- ing, any more than the possession of a library is knowledge, i or a sermon religion. Children especially require to be taught the application of what they learn, in order that they should profit by it. The disposition of the child, whether for good or evil, is imperfectly developed under the constraint and formality of the school-room. The play- ground, or the field, gives scope for the free working of nature—feelings, passions, and talents obtain free scope; and in this unconstrained state alone can these be ascer- tained, moulded, encouraged, or uprooted. Much may be done towards this in the school-room, and it would be very unfair to depreciate the earnest efforts, by precept and school discipline, rewards and punishments, to minister towards it in all good schools; but, after all, if the observa- tion of conduct be confined to the room, the work is not, and cannot be, thoroughly accomplished. Moreover, until lately, the duty of moral training (ignored in nearly all in- ferior schools) has been but very scantily acknowledged or enforced in any of the very valuable works on education which its friends have published. After Mr. Stow, Mr. Dunn has probably said more on the subject than any other;FOR POOR CHILDREN. 41 and lie laments the imperfect manner in which it is carried out. In his very able work, entitled The Principles of Teaching, he remarks:— In moral education, a twofold work has to be accomplished : 4 the faculty of reason must be taught how to judge rightly between truth and error, good and evil,' and the habit of acting rightly must be formed in order that the imagination, the pas- sions, and the affections, may be accustomed to bow to the decisions of reason, when thus enlightened and strengthened. The first of these (the formation of right judgments) has long been a primary object of our efforts; the last (the formation of habits and the regulation of emotions) has not yet received that share of attention which its paramount importance demands. It may be worth inquiry whether more cannot be done in this way than has hitherto been considered practicable. I am convinced, not only from long observation of the existing short-comings in the ordinary schools, but by prac- tical experience of a different system at Quatt and other industrial schools, that efficient moral training can T>e ! best accomplished where industrial labour out of school is combined with religious and secular instruction in school; and I believe horticulture and farm-work by far ; the best adapted for the purpose. It seems to have these recommendations as regards moral training: first, the child is thereby taught to be useful, and receives perhaps .his earliest lesson in labour. This is a great step in moral elevation, and herein does industrial employment distance the playground, which affords no such advantage. In the next place, the work done is of a kind to call into operation not only more of the faculties of mind and body, but also of the moral feelings and perceptions. Thirdly, horticulture has a direct tendency to turn the mind to God. It has been truly said, that4 it presents to the bodies of children healthful and placid muscular development; to their minds, ever-varying proofs of the Almighty's greatness, goodness, and wisdom.' Its advantages as an auxiliary to the general work of such education as may fit the child for the station42 HOW TO MAKE SCHOOLS USEFUL in life in which it has pleased God to place hini are borne out, not merely by the practical proofs I have seen of its efficiency, but by the highest authorities on the subject of education, amongst whom are the Dean of Hereford and my respected colleague, the Rev. Mr. Moseley, who says, in one of his recent reports:— The King's Sombourne School, on which I have already reported at length, still stands alone in the views and principles as to secular instruction on which it is conducted. Schools resembling it in the scale of payment are indeed multiplying,, but the idea on which the school is based as to teaching, I find reproduced nowhere. 4 We educate,' said Mr. Dawes (now Dean of Hereford), in his recent pamphlet, entitled Observa- tions on the Working of the Government Scheme of Educa- tion, 4 in the middle class with reference to the way in which people are to get their livelihoods, and why not in the lower ?* That is a just view of the education, which considers it in relation to the things which surround the child to be educated, and the exigences of its condition, and so obvious a one, that it would seem needless to insist upon it, were it not a very rare thing to find it acted upon. As to the manner of instruction, it suggests the expediency of not dealing with a mind, subject to one class of moral influ- ences, accustomed to expatiate among one class of objects, and adapt itself to one social position, precisely as you would a mind placed in all these respects under other circumstances and in other relations. All this obviously points to a different order of schools than we at present possess, save in some exceptional cases* It also demands another order of teacher. It is by more intimate intercourse than that of the old style of mere master and scholar that faults are known and corrected, virtues de- veloped and nursed, sympathies strengthened, minds opened, and knowledge improved. The field is a fine sphere for effecting all this. I believe that schools without industrial and moral training fulfil but part, and that the least im- portant part, of education. It is not too much to say, that mere schools cannot educate. I believe this to be true even for the higher and middle classes of the people; but itFOR POOR CHILDREN. 43 is infinitely more true and forcible when we are dealing with poor children, who require both moral and physical regime. Of very little avail is it to teach such children the rudiments of book learning, or to seek to remedy evil passions and idle habits with catechisms and copy-books. They require, I repeat it, a far more apt and practical dis- cipline, and I believe it is embodied in religious and < in- dustrial training.' An aptitude for work of all kinds, and habits of industry, are the chief industrial advantages of the system. It is a mistake to suppose that the intention is to form finished labourers, or skilled artisans. Boys thus educated will probably, on leaving school, be neither able to plough, milk, shear, or mow; but they will, in addition to a store of prac- tical and useful knowledge, have acquired those useful gifts— a handiness for work and a habit of industry. Mr. Bowyer, one of Her Majesty's Inspectors of Union Schools, speaks thus of many of the schools in workhouses; and assuredly it is quite as true and applicable to the majority of schools for the independent poor:— They are reared like the sons of persons of fortune, and their days are passed in alternate lessons and play. A boy thus brought up is entirely unfitted for an agricultural labourer; he can neither dig, hoe, nor plough; is puzzled with a harness, and afraid of a horse. Any hard or continuous labour exhausts his body and wearies his mind; he has formed a completely false conception of the life that awaited him ; instead of the joyous voices of his playfellows, he hears the rough commands of an unindulging master or a scolding mistress; he is con- tinually reproached for his awkwardness and timidity, and reminded of his pauper origin. Under these circumstances, it can hardly be wondered at if he often look back with regret to the happy indolence of his childhood.44 HOW TO MAKE SCHOOLS USEFUL Vehrli, Principal of the Swiss Teachers' College at Con- stance, thus expressed himself to Mr. Kay, the author of that very valuable work, The Social Condition of the People in Germany and Switzerland:— After a long experience in teaching both the children of rich and poor, it is my firm opinion that all children should be accustomed, while they are young, to labour with their own hands for a certain time every day. "No school ought ever to be situated in a town. All ought to be situated in the country; and every boy, 110 matter who his parents are, ought to be obliged to labour upon the soil. Labour makes the children healthy, capable of bearing fatigue, and robust, and it teaches the children of the rich to get rid of all those notions which riches are apt to stimulate; to understand the feelings of the poor better; to treat them better, and to associate with them better; it thus diminishes the artificial distance between classes, and, with the1 distinction of this artificial distance, it diminishes also the jealous feelings which false mannerism on the part of the rich too often engenders. The beneficial effect of industrial labour on mental activity is great. I have no hesitation in saying, that four hours' school with it is quite equivalent to six without it, and that more will be learned in the four hours; for so close is the sympathy of body with mind, that the indolence of the one is the feebleness of the other. Mental strength, incompatible with an inert frame, gains necessarily with that which develops bodily vigour. Vehrli's notions are much too far-going for adoption here as regards the rich, but they are not beyond the chance of being applied to the poor, which will suffice for our purpose. One of the best practical examples of the value of farm schools is that of the school at Quatt in Shropshire, in conjunction with the Bridgnorth Union, and now a district school for the pauper children of four unions. This school owes much of its merit and success to the unwearying interest taken in it by Mr. Whitmore of Dudmaston, and also to the peculiar talent and zeal of Mr. Garland, theFOR POOR CHILDREN. 45 master, who has accomplished more by his own single- handed exertion, than could have been done by any one whose heart and hand were less devoted to the work. This school being a boarding-school, with many small children, requires much more labour than any day-school which adopted the industrial system. A short description of this school, as given in one of my reports to the Lords of the Committee of Council, will serve to illustrate the system recommended. It affords at once a proof of the profit both to the children and the ratepayers. It is the only school, with one or two exceptions, in my district, where the children are entirely separated from the work- house. A private dwelling-house has been taken, in a rural village four miles from the workhouse, with about four acres of arable, and half an acre of meadow land. About fifteen boys cultivate this land, and attend to the stable, cows, pigs, &c. Not quite as many girls are instructed and employed in household work, sewing, baking, washing, and the dairy. The afternoons are wholly devoted to industrial labour, and the mornings chiefly to school instruction, in which the attainments of the children are very superior to those of most workhouse schools where no industrial training exists. An account of the produce of the land, together with the description given by Mr. Garland, the master, of his system of culti- vation, was obtained by me from him, and has been extensively circulated throughout the unions of England. In that account, Mr. Garland gave an abstract of the ledger of one year, which has been made the subject of much comment and discussion. Further information on the subject will be found in the Appendix lettered C, which contains some authenticated details and proofs of the productiveness of spade husbandry, and to which I invite attention. It will suffice to state here, that this establish- ment is not based, as has been most erroneously supposed,46 HOW TO MAKE SCHOOLS USEFUL on a self-supporting system : it was neither designed nor intended for such. The mere fact that only four and a half acres of land are taken into cultivation, ought to have prevented such a mis-impression. The large produce derived from this very limited portion of land has, indeed, been held forth, as well it might, as evidence of what may be done on a larger scale, in order to reimburse the expenses of such establishments ; but this was all. The mis-impression was, however, of a somewhat mis- chievous tendency, inasmuch as it represented what is really a most successful attempt at industrial training, in the light of an agricultural speculation, of which the merits might be debateable. It may be safely upheld, as an almost perfect example of the virtues of spade hus- bandry for educational purposes, but it is by no means an example of all that may be effected in realizing large produce from the land by such a mode of cultivation. But I can safely aver, that the effects of the system at the Quatt farm school upon the minds, morals, hearts, and conduct of the children have left little to desire. Although the children cannot of course learn all the various work to be done in farms, so as to become perfect labourers; and though the girls in their various occupa- tions in the house, the kitchen, the dairy, the bakehouse, the washhouse, and the laundry, do not in all cases become perfect servants; yet both boys and girls learn the elements of profitable industry in all these useful spheres of service. They become apt, instead of inapt, for industrial pursuits. Instead of leaving the workhouses, as the children in them generally do,—nerveless, spiritless, inert, unskilled even in the use of their hands and arms, those at Quatt go forth well qualified to profit both themselves and those who employ them. This result seems to be fully appre- ciated by the farmers and others, who are desirous of obtaining them as servants.FOR POOR CHILDREN. 47 Of their mental progress I can speak in equally high terms. The vigour of the body imparts itself to the intellect; and not only relieves the monotony of the school-room by the alternate labour in the fields, but it gives zest and energy to the powers of the mind. In understanding the Scriptures, arithmetical calcu- lations, the comprehension of the objects of nature, in general information, as well as in various branches of mere mechanical instruction, such as reading, writing, spelling, &c., these boys at the Quatt farm school excel those in the great majority of schools of far higher pretension which have fallen under my notice. Mr. Gar- land, the excellent master, has the faculty of gaining the affections of these poor children, many of whom in after life will regard him as a friend to whom they owe the highest debt of gratitude and affection. The Rev. Mr. Moseley, speaking of this school, says:— It is plain, therefore, that the fifteen boys of the Quatt school •earn a good deal more than the cost of their dinners daily ; and I think I am justified in assuming, that the like number of boys •of similar ages, in any village school, aided by the master, hav- ing the same facilities for cultivating the same number of acres of ground, and devoting to the cultivation of it the same number