^^m ^■^'^wy^w^ Sm LIBRARY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA FROM THE LIBRARY OF MRS. H. RUSSELL AMORY. GIFT OF HER CHILDREN R. W. AND NINA PARTRIDGE, ,yVV^i^|;^J, mm ViT'-WW^ |^i|j5P|^j||^|ppiiff|'ipij^2 msmm::mMmm: HISTORICAL PARALLELS. IN THREE VOLUMES VOL. I. LONDON: CHARLES KNIGHT & Co., LUDGATE STREET. 1846. PRINTED BY WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONs, STAMFORD STREET. D 10 V. I CONTENTS. H2(> Page Introduction . . " 5 CHAPTER I. Mythic period of Grecian history — Savage state of Greece compared with that of Scandinavia — Anecdotes of Northern warriors — Hercules — Theseus — State of Greece in their time, illustrated by that of England subsequent to the Conquest — Argonautic expedition — Theban war — Story of Don Pedro of Castile — Trojan war 11 CHAPTER II. Aristomenes — Hereward le Wake — Wallace ... 40 CHAPTER III. Treatment of Prisoners of War — Croesus — Roman Tri- umphs — Sapor and Valerian — Imprisonment of Bajazet — His treatment of the Marshal Boucicaut and his Companions — Changes produced by the- advance of Civilization — Effect of Feudal Institu- tions — Anecdote from Froissart — Conduct of the Black Prince towards the Constable Du Gwesclin and the King of France 77 CHAPTER IV. Tyranny of Cambyses, terminating in madness — of Caligula— of the Emperor Paul , ... , .11 IV CONTENTS. CHAPTER V. Page Early changes in the Athenian constitution — Murder of Cylon — Fatalism — Usurpation of Pisistratus — His policy — Hippias and Hipparchus — Conspiracy of Harraodius and Aristogiton — Expulsion of Hip- pias — Cosmo de* Medici, Lorenzo and Giuliano de' Medici — Conspiracy of the Pazzi . . . .153 CHAPTEK VI. Invasion of Scythia by Darius — Destruction of Crassus and his army by the Parthians — Retreat of An- tony — Retreat and death of Julian — Retreat from Moscow 190 ( 5 ) HISTORICAL PARALLELS. INTRODUCTION. Works of history may be divided into two great classes : those which select a single action or a detached period for their subject ; and those which follow a nation through the whole or a large portion of its existence ; and which, embracing a number of such subjects, com- pensate for giving less minute and accurate information upon each, by explaining their relation, and the influence which thoy have exerted upon each other. To the former belong Thucydides, Xonophon, and Ceesar ; to the latter Diodorus and Livy : or, in English literature, we may take Clarendon and Hume respectively as the representatives of these divisions. It is obvious that the method of treating themes so different in character, must also be essentially different ; that for an historian of the latter class to aim at the particularity which we expect in the former, would involve something of the same absurdity as if a landscape painter were to give to an extended horizon the distinctness and detail which are proper lo his foregrounds or to a closely bounded scene. If our curiosity is not satisfied by a comprehensive view, the remedy is to be found by multiplying pictures of its most striking parts, not by introducing into one canvas a multitude of objects which must fatigue and confuse the mind, and obscure those leading features which ought to stand out in prominent relief. Any one who wished to become acquainted with the nature and characteristics of a country, which he could not survey personally, VOL. I. B ' HISTORICAL PARALLELS. would neither confine his inspection to bircrs-e3^e.7and panoramic views, nor content himself with a series of detached paintings, though representing separately whatever was most worthy of observation : in the one case his ideas, though perhaps correct, would neces- sarily be slight and superficial ; in the other, his know- ledge of the parts would never enable him to form an accurate judgment of the whole. Valuable, therefore, as is the assistance of those authors who have devoted their talents and learning to epitomizing and rendering accessible the story of past ages, it is far from desirable that we should content our- selves with a blind trust in them, without checking their assertions, and filling up their sketches by a more detailed knowledge than it is possible for them to communicate. To apply these observations to the present work, the History of Greece contained in the Librarj- of Useful Knowledge necessarily gives a very short account of many things v.hich deserve to be known in detail, both on account of their historical notoriety and for the in- trinsic value which they possess as striking examples of human power, passion, and suffering. Much of the ex- cessive commendation which has been bestowed upon ancient virtue and patriotism ought probably to be attri- buted to the eager interest naturally excited by the re- vival of learning and the peculiar circumstances under which it took place. The discovery of the works of the most celebrated writers of antiquity, whose names at least had not been forgotten, must at any time have pro- duced much curiosity and excitement : and peculiarly so when modern literature did not yet possess many names to divide the palm of genius with them. Besides this the political circumstances of the Italian states, in which the new discoveries were at first most successfully and generally prosecuted, would give an additional interest and a peculiar bias to the study of ancient literature ; for their inhabitants would naturally be disposed, as Italians, to exult in the glories of ancient Italy, and as republicans to look for patterns both of polity and of conduct among the famous republics of Greece and Ixomc. I>TRODUCTIOX. / A contrary cause, in a later age, and in countries subject to arbitrary power, would probably conduce to the con- tinuance of the same feeling, when the prevalent subjec- tion of public opinion made it safer to enforce sentiments of freedom and pati-iotism under the mask of an over- strained admiration for actions, frecjuently of very ques- tionable character, done in times long past, than openly to profess the love of republican simplicity and liberty, which was willingly left to be inferred. The usual course of education long tended, and in an inferior degree perhaps still tends, to cherish the same indis- criminate enthusiasm. The first histories put into the hands of children are usually those of Greece and Rome, taken not from the sober and comparatively unprejudiced relations of the earliest authorities, but from Plutarch, and other compilers of a later age, who, living themselves under despotic power, and compelled to veil their philosophical aspirations after a better state of polity and morals under extravagant praises of a by-gone period of imaginary virtue and disinterestedness, were for the most *o' ly part ready to warp truth into correspondence with their own views. In such works actions are held up to admi- ration because they are brilliant, without much inquiry whether they were justifiable ; wanton and unjust aggressions, and other crimes of still deeper dye, are g-lossed over upon some false plea of patriotism ; or their moral quality is never alluded to, and the young reader is too much captivated by the splendour of bravery and talent, to remember that the ends to wdiich these gifts are directed should never be forgotten in estimating their claim to applause.* But w^hatever be our opinion * A striking instance of this occurs in Justin. Speaking of Havmodius and Aristogiton (see chap, v.), he says, " One of the murderers, being put to the torture to extract the names of his accomplices, enumerated all the nearest friends of Hippias. These were all put to death, and being asked whether any others were jn-ivy to his designs, he answered, that now none remained whom he wished to perish, except the tyrant himself. The eit}-, admonished by his virtue, expelled Hippias." — Lib. ii. 9". The virtue of this act con- 8 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. touching Grecian and Roman virtue, or the moral cha- racter of the most celebrated portions of their history, these have obtained a degree of currency and notoriety which render familiar acquaintance with them almost necessary for the full understanding of much even of modern literature. The object of this work is to supply, in part, these details from the original historians, and to compare or contrast them with other remarkable inci- dents of ancient or modern times ; in hope of forming a collection of narratives of some interest to those who are not largely read in history. And even those who are in some degree familiar with the] subjects here treated, but whose knowledge is chiefly drawn from compilations of modern date, may be gratified by the variety in style, feelings, and opinions observable in a collection oi ex- tracts from authors of various dates and nations. We have selected from the Grecian History, in chro- nological order, as furnishing the readiest principle of arrangement, a series of occurrences of which some have obtained remarkable notoriety ; some, being less known, are either striking in themselves, or characteristic of the age and people to which they belong ; and finally some, with less intrinsic value, may serve to introduce curious or instructive matter of comparison. To every person well acquainted with the subject, many things will proba- bly occur, of which the omission may be regretted. Com- pleteness, however, is evidently unattainable in an under- taking of this sort, and the passages taken from Grecian history have necessarily been regulated in part by the cor- respondences which presented themselves in the histories of other nations. It has been our object to draw ex- amples from a great variety of sources ; from different countries, in different ages, and in different states of sisted in sacrificing innocent lives to his revenge, by means of a lying accusation : and the stern endurance of this man is dignified with the praise of fortitude and patriotism, with- out the slightest reference to its atrocious injustice. The story itself rests upon Justin's authority, and may reasonably be rejected as an improbable fiction. _; INTRODUCTION^. 9 civilization : and to show that no particular virtues or vices have been inherent in any age or nation : believing that human nature and human passions are everywhere alike, and that the great difFerences in national character are mainly to be ascribed to external circumstances and training. Comparisons of contrast, therefore, are no less valuable than comparisons of resemblance, when we can trace the causes which have produced a difference in conduct. It only remains to add, that we have not always thought it necessary to require a close analogy either of motives or of actions. The instances chosen have not been very strictly con- fined to what rests upon undoubted testimony. Perhaps we learn little less of the habits and opinions of men, from ascertaining what they have believed of others, than from knowing what they have done themselves ; and, there- fore, even works of fiction may be resorted to in some degree, care being taken to distinguish the character of the authorities. For example, we should have no hesi- tation in quoting even from the Mort d'Arthur, and still more from the earlier romances on which it is founded, in illustration of the manners of the twelfth and thir- teenth centuries, in which those romances were written ; or, though on different grounds, the admirable narratives of the plagues of Florence and London by Boccaccio and Defoe, which probably are no less trustworthy for the character of the narrative, and in a great degree for the facts themselves, than Thucydides' description of the plague at Athens. Again, there is a sort of debateable ground, where genuine history begins to gain the as- cendant over fable, as in the case of Aristomenes and Wallace, where we cannot tell, nor is it important to know, the exact measure of truth contained in the legends con- cerning them. The outlines of their lives we have reason to believe to be correct, and rejecting from their exploits all that is grossly improbable, the remainder will furnish us with a sufficiently clear idea of the accomplishments and adventures of a warrior of their respective ages. The poem of Blind Harry abounds in improbable fictions, but much more information concerning Wallace 10 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. and his contemporaries may be gained from it than from the meagre chronicles which composed the graver literature of the age. From such sources, therefore, we shall not scruple to borrow, though not without adver- tising the reader of their nature, and endeavouring, where necessary, to draw the boundary line between truth and fiction. For reasons above stated, our extracts have usually been taken from contemporary authors, or at least from the earliest authorities extant. Where this rule has been departed from, it is because the originals offer no striking passages to select, and are too prolix to be given entire. In this case, condensation becomes neces- sary, and we have gladly availed ourselves of the labours of others who have already performed that task, in pre- ference to seeking novelty at the expense perhaps .'of accuracy or elegance. For the same reason existing translations have been used, M'henever a good translation of the particular passage could be found. Where none such occurred, we have endeavoured to adhere closely to our author, and even where his narrative has been much compressed, to give, as far as was possible, not only his substance, but his w^ords. ( il ) CHAPTER I. Mythic period of Grecian history — Savage state of Greece compared with that of Scandinavia — Anecdotes of North- ern warriors — Hercules — Theseus — State of Greece in their time, illustrated by that of England subsequent to the Conquest — Argonautic expedition — Theban war — Story of Don Pedro of Castile — Trojan war. The traditions from which our knowledge of what is called the mythic age of Greece, or the age of fable, from the earliest notices of it to the Trojan war, is almost entirely derived, furnish few materials for a work like this, for where everything is misty and un- defined, there can be little opportunity for comparison. The wonderful poetic talent displayed in their narra- tion and embellishment has, however, given them a place in history, and an importance otherwise unde- served, and men study the actions and genealogy of an Achaian prince, as gravely as if he had been really the descendant of Jupiter, and the conqueror of monsters and oppressors innumei'able. It becomes the more 12 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. interesting therefore to inquire into the actual condi- tion of Greece in its earliest times, and ascertain, if possible, whether the godlike men, sprung from the Gods, of whose superhuman powers and exploits suc- ceeding ages have read, until by the mere force of repetition they have half believed them, had in reality any advantage over barbarians of other races and re- gions. To guide us in the inquiry we have two sorts of information, totally distinct in their nature : the meagre notices of authentic history, and a copious store ot mythological and poetical legends. So far as the for- mer is available, we have no reason to think that the heroic age had much advantage over those dark times in which the foundations of modern Europe were laid. Passing over the account given by Thucydides of the earliest inhabitants of Greece as being applicable to any savage race, in the next stage of society, when the arts had somewhat advanced, in the reign of JNIinos, the first person perhaps of whom any rational and credible account is given, a code of honour existed which made strength not only the first but the sum-total of all vir- tues, and filled the sea with pirates and the land with robbers. "Minos was the most ancient of all that by report we know to have built a navy, and he made himself master of the now Grecian sea, and both commanded the Isles called Cyclades,* and also was the first who sent colonies into most of the same, expelling thence the Carians, and constituting his own sons there for go- vernors, and also freed the sea from pirates as much as he could, for the better coming in, as is likely, of his own revenue. " For the Grecians in old time and such barbariansf as in the continent lived near unto the sea or else in- habited the islands, when they began more often to cross over to one another in ships, became thieves, and * The cluster of the Archipelago nearest Attica. f The Greeks called all other nations barbarians, which generally means no more than people of a different stock. MYTHIC PERIOD. 13 went abroad under the conduct of their most puissant men, both to enrich themselves and to fetch in main- tenance for the weak : and falling upon towns unfortified, and scatteringly inhabited, rifled them, and made this the best means of their living- ; being at that time a mat- ter nowhere in disgrace, but rather carrying with it something of glory. This is manifest by some that dwell on the continent, among whom, so it be per- formed nobly, it is still esteemed as an ornament. The same also is proved by some of the ancient poets, who introduce men questioning such as sail by, on all coasts alike, whether they be thieves or not ;* as a thing neither scorned by such as were asked, nor upbraided by those that were desirous to know. They also robbed one another within the main land : and much of Greece useth that old custom, as the Locrians called Ozolse (or Stinkards), the Acarnanians, and those of the con- tinent in that quarter unto this day. Moreover the fashion of wearing iron remainoth yet with the people of that continent from their old trade of thieving. " For once they were wont throughout all Greece to go armed, because their houses were unfenced and travelling unsafe, and accustomed themselves like the barbarians to the ordinary wearing of their armour. And the nations of Greece that live so yet, do testify that the same manner of life was anciently universal to all the rest.'-}- A condition of society identical with that described in the latter part of this extract still exists among the Curdish and Caucasian and other Asiatic mountaineers, and existed till lately in the Scottish Highlands. But descriptions of the latter have been multiplied, until * So Nestor addresses Telemachus, " Strangers, who are 3'ou, from whence do you navigate the watery way ? Is it with any settled purpose, or do you roam at liazard like rob- bers over the sea, who wander wagering their o^Tn lives, bearing evil to others ?" Odyss. iii. 71. t Thucyd. book i. chap. 4, 5, 6. We use Hobbes' trans- lation. 14 HISTORICAL PAKALLELS. they have become familiar in men's mouths as household terms ; and we pass in preference to a less hackneyed subject. In the eighth and ninth centuries the piratical spirit of ancient Greece was revived among- those fierce Danes and Norwegians, who led a life of constant rapine and bloodshed ; of interminable warfare at home, of Irightful devastation abroad. " The Sea-kings of the North were a race of beings whom Europe beheld with horror. Without a yard of territorial property, with no wealth but their ships, no force but their crews, and no hope but from their swords, they swarmed upon the boisterous ocean, and plundered in every district that they could approach It is declared to have been a law or custom in the North, that one of the male children should be selected to remain at home to inherit the government. The rest were exiled to the ocean, to wield their sceptres amid the turbulent waters. The consent of the northern societies entitled all men of royal descent, who assumed piracy as a profession, to enjoy the name of kings, though they possessed no territory. The sea-kings had the same honour, but they w^ere only a portion of those pirates, or viking?-, who in the ninth centurj^ were covering the ocean. Not only the children of the kings, but every man of importance equipped ships, and roamed the seas to acquire property by force. Pirac}^ was not only the most honourable occupation and the best harvest of wealth ; it was not only consecrated to public estim.ation by the illustrious who pursued it, but no one was esteemed noble, no one was respected, who did not return in the winter to his home with ships laden with booty."* Part of the regulations of a band of pirates is preserved by Bartho- linus, and may serve as a specimen of the better class, though the reader may not be inclined to agree with him in considering them as men " devoted to virtue, bravery, and humanity, rather than to the oppression of innocent persons." These regulations were called the Constitutions of King Half. ''No one might wear a * Turner, An^.-Sax. NORTHERN WARRIORS. 15 sword more than an ell in length, that they might be compelled to close in battle. Each was to be equal in strength to twelve ordinary men. They made prisoners neither women nor boys. None was to bind his wounds until the lapse of twenty hours. These men everywhere infested the land, and everywhere were victorious. They lay at anchor at the ends of headlands. They never raised bulwarks on their ships' sides, and never- lowered their sails, let the wind blow as it would. Their captain never had in his ship more than sixty men."' No less creditable were the ordinances of Ilial- mar, the sum of which was, that his men should plunder neither traders nor husbandmen ; that they should neither rob women of their money, nor carry them oft' against their consent : and should not eat raw flesh.* The fiercer class indulged in this disgusting food, and washed it down suitably with draughts of blood. Savage in all things, it was an amusement to toss infants from one to another, and catch them on the points of their lances. Many used to work themselves literally into a state of bestial ferocity. Those who were subject to these paroxysms were called Berserkir : they studied to resemble wild beasts ; they excited themselves to a strength which has been compared to that of bears ; and this unnatural power was succeeded, as we may well suppose, by corresponding debility. In the French and Italian romances, we frequently find a warrior endowed, for a part of the day, with a double or treble share of strength ; and it is not improbable that the fiction may have been derived from this species of frenzy, which is thus described by the Danish historian, Saxo Gram- maticus. " Sivald had seven sons, so skilled in magic, that, impelled by the sudden access of fury, they used often to howl savagely, to gnaw their shields, to devour live coals, and rush fearlessly into fire ; and this passion could only be appeased by confinement in fetters, or by human blood." This Sivald and Haldan were rivals * Bartholinus, De Causis Contempt£c a Danis Mortis, lib. ii. 9. 16 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. for the Swedish crown. Sivald challenged Haldan to decide their quarrel by contending alone with himself and his seven sons. The latter answered that the legitimate form of the duel did not admit of more than two. " No wonder," replied his antagonist, " that a man without wife or offspring, whose mind and body are alike deficient in warmth, should refuse the proffered encounter. But my children, who own me as the author of their existence, and myself, have one common origin, and must be considered as one man," Tlie force of the argument was admitted, and, in obedience to this modest request, Ilaldan knocked out the brains of the eight. The same warrior was challenged by another Ber- serkir, named Ilarthben, who always had twelve chosen men in attendance to prevent his doing mischief when the fit was upon him. Upon hearing that Ilaldan undertook to fight himself and his followers, he was seized with a paroxysm which was not subdued until he had killed six of them, by way of trying his hand : and then he was killed by his antagonist, as he richly de- served, for throwing away half his chance.* So also we read that Odin could blunt the weapons of his enemies ; that his soldiers went to battle without armour, biting their shields, raging like wolves or dogs : like bears or bulls in strength, they slaughtered their foes, and were themselves invulnerable to fire and sword. f At length, however, this passion changed from a distinction to a reproach, and was ultimately prohibited by penal laws. Harold Harfager, or theFairhaired, who consolidated Norway under his sceptre, a.d. 910, cleared the North- ern Ocean I'rom the scourge of ])iracy, as did Minos the Grecian seas. Still the spirit of depredation was alive. The spread of Christianity moderated the excesses of the Northmen, but it was long ere their fondness for freebooting was extinguished ; nay, the very rites of religion were employed to give a sanction to robbery. Maritime expeditions seemed to the Danes pious and nc- * Saxo, lib. vii. f Bartholinus, ii. 5. NORTHERJf WARRIORS. 17 cessary, that they might protect themselves from the incursions of their Sclavonic neighbours on the continent, and piracy was therefore practised under certain laws, which in the 0])inion of Bartholinus breathe a spirit of defence rather than of aggression. " Pirates had power to take such ships as appeared suited to their purpose, even without consent of the owners, upon payment of one-eighth of the booty by v/ay of hire. Before a voy- age they made confession to the priests, and having un- dergone penance, they received the sacrament, as if at the point of death, believing that things would go more prosperously if they duly propitiated (iod before war. Content with their food and armour, they avoided bur- dening their vessels, and took nothing that could delay their voyage. Their watches were frequent, their mode of life sparing. Tliey slept leaning upon their oars. Their battles were numerous : their victory ever easy, and almost bloodless. The booty was shared equally, the master receiving no larger portion than a common rower. Those Christians whom they found enslaved in the captured vessels, they presented with clothing, and dismissed to their own homes."* : The frantic ravages of these barbarians have been de- scribed by the sutierers, and belong in part to our own history ; while those committed by the unknown tribes who two thousand years before occupied the other ex- tremity of Europe, are long since forgotten, or remem- bered only in the flattering traditions of their country- men. The former, therefore, are known and execrated, while the latter stand fair with the world : and in the absence of evidence, we are far from wishing to impute to them that bestial ferocity which so often disgraced the Northmen : but who can compare the passages just given with that quoted from Thucydides, without being con- vinced that they refer to corresponding periods of civiliza- tion, and describe similar principles, if not similar modes of action ? And as the best historical accounts which we can procure represent the feelings and habits of the early * BarthoL, 1. ii. 9. 18 HISTOKICAli PARALLELS. Greeks as closely akin to those of" our own barbarous an- cestors, so their traditions and fables lead us to the same conclusion. The Scaldic poems bear, indeed, a more sa- vage cast ; some say from the inhospitable rigour of our northern sky ; but more probably because we possess them in their original or nearly their original state, while the earliest Greek compositions extant were writ- ten in an age comparatively civilized. But the heroes of both were actuated by the same spirit. Siegfrid and Wolf Dietrich differ little but in external ornament from Castor, or Achilles, or Diomed ; their pride was in the same accomplishments, their delight in the same plea- sures, their hope in an immortality of the same sensual enjoyments.* * We speak with some degree of doubt, both from the fluctuatiug notions of the Greeks upon this head, and from imperfect acquaintance with their opinions. The unhesitat- ing belief of the Celtic nations in a happy immortality was known even in the time of Lucan, and is celebrated by him in a fine and well-known passage. The immortality of Ho- mer's heroes was mournful and discontented. " Talk not to me of death," says Achilles (Od. xi. 487), " I would rather be the hired servant of some needy man, whose means of life are scanty, than rule over the whole of the deceased." Other passages to the same effect are collected at the beginning of the third book of the Republic, by Plato, who objects seri- ously to their effect as making death an object of terror. Yet, in another passage, Homer speaks of the " Elysian plain, and the ends of the earth, where man's life is easiest, where there is no snow, nor rain, nor winter, but thither ocean ever wafts the clear-toned gales of the west to refresh men." (Od. iv. 565.) Hesiod, on the other hand (Works and Days, v. 1()6), and, some centuries after, Pindar (01. ii.), speak of a futui'e life as perfectly happy, describing it in terms closely similar to those of the last quotation from Homer. All these writers appear to place their happiness in perfect rest : the blessed are no longer compelled to till the earth, or navigate the ocean ; they lead a careless life ; there is no reference to sen- sual pleasures, except that the earth produces fruits sponta- neously thrice a year, nor even to their continuing to take delight in arms or in the chace. In later authors they are NORTHERN WARRIORS. 19 Some sketch of the life of Starchatems, a purely fictiti- ous person, may serve as a specimen of these stories. Starchaterus was born in Sweden, a few years after the Christian era. He was of giant stature, and of strength and courage correspondent to the magnitude of his frame, so that in prowess he was held inferior to none of mortal parentage ; and, as he excelled all in bodily endo\Yments, so his life was protracted to three times the usual dura- tion of human existence. Like his great prototype, the Grecian Hercules, he traversed the neighbouring regions, and went even to Ireland and Constantinople in quest of adventures ; but, unlike him, he was animated by a most intolerant hatred of everything approaching to lux- ury, insomuch that he treated an invitation to dinner as an insult, and inflicted severe punishment upon all who were so imprudently hospitable as to request his company. For it was the mark of a butlbon and parasite, he said, to run after the smell of another man's kitchen, for the sake of better fare.* In other respects the severity of his described as retaining the habits and pleasures of life : see the note on the scholium of Callistratus, chap. v. ; Ov. Met. iv. 444 ; and more especially the passage in Virgil, vi. 651, •which, but for wanting the personal superintendence of Odin, bears much resemblance to a refined Valhalla. The chief beheld their chariots from afar, Their shining arms, and coursers trained to war ,* Their lances fixed in earth, their steeds around, Free from their harness, graze the flowery ground. The love of horses, which they had alive, And care of chariots, after death survive. Some cheerful souls were feasting on the plain. Some did the song and some the choir maintain. Dryden. Mitford, on the other hand, says, that " the drunken pai-adise of the Scandinavian Odin was really a notion, as we learn from Plato, of the highest antiquity among the Greeks." (Chap. ii. sect. 1.) He has not, however, given references, and we much regret that we have not been able to find the passage. * He had the advantage over Hercules here ; see the Al- cestes, V. 763, ed. Monk. 20 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. manners was more commendable ; M'hen he found any of the classes who live by the lollies or vices of mankind mixing with soldiers, he drove them away with the scourge, esteeming them unworthy to receive death from the hands of brave men. In addition to his other ac- complishments, he was skilled in poetry, and persecuted luxury in verse no less successfully than by corporeal in- flictions, as is evident from certain of his compositions, which have been translated into Latin by Saxo Gramma- ticns. lie went to Russia on purpose to fight Visin, who pos- sessed the power of blunting weapons with a look, and trusting in this magic power, exercised all sorts of cruelty and oppression. Starchaterus rendered the charm of no avail by covering his sword with thin leather, and then obtained an easy victory. Nine warriors of tried valour offered to Helgo, king of Norway, the alternative of doing battle singly against the nine, or losing his bride uj)on his marriage- day. Ilelgo thought it best to appear by his champion, and requested the assistance of Starchaterus, who was so eager for the adventure, that in following Helgo to the appointed ])lace, in one day, and on foot, he performed a journey which had occupied the king, who travelled on horseback, daring twelve days. On the morrow, which w^as the appointed day, ascending a mountain, which was the ]>lace of meeting, he chose a spot exposed to the ■wind and snow, and then, as if it were spring, throwing off his clothes, lie set himself to dislodge the fleas that nestled in them. Then the nine warriors ascended the mountain on the other side, and showed the difference of their hardihood by lighting a fire in a sheltered spot. Not perceiving their antagonist, one went to look out from the mountain top, who saw at a distance an old man covered with snow up to the shoulders. They asked him if it were he who was to fight with them, and being answered in the affirmative, inquired further, whe- ther he would receive ihem singly or all together. His reply was rather more churlish than the question de- served : " When the dogs bark at me, I drive them off all NORTHERX WARRIORS. 21 together, and not one by one." Then, after a severe battle, he slew them all. At last, being overtaken by age, he thought it fit to terminate his lil'e before iiis glory was dimmed by de- crepitude'; for men used to consider it disgraceful for a warrior to perish by sickness. So he hung round his neck one hundred and twenty pounds of gold> the spoil of one Olo, to buy the good offices of an executioner, thinking it fit that the wealth which he had obtained by another man's death should be spent in procuring his own. And meeting Hather, whose father he had for- merly slain, he exhorted him to take vengeance for that injury, and pointed out what he would gain by doing so. Hather willingly consented, and Starchaterus, stretching out his neck, bade him strike boldly, adding, for his en- couragement, that if he leaped between the severed head and the trunk before the latter touched the earth, he would become invincible in arms. Now, whether he said this out of good will, or to be quits with his slayer, who ran a good chance of being crushed by the falling giant, is doubtful. The head, stricken off at a blow, bit the earth, retaining its ferocity in death : but Starchaterus' real meaning remained unknown, for Hather showed his prudence by declining to take a leap, which had he taken, he might never, have leaped again.* This is an early and rude specimen of an errant knight ; the same character which Mas afterwards expanded into Roland and Launcelot, the paladins and peers of Charle- magne and Arthur, worthies closely allied to the heroes of Homer and Hesiod. The triple-bodied Geryon, the jSemean lion and Lern^au hydra, the deliverance of Andromeda by Perseus, the capture of the golden fleece, and above all, perhaps, Amycus, who compelled all strangers to box with him, till he was beaten by Pollux, and bound by oath to renounce the practice, are entirely in unison with the spirit and imagery of chivalric ro- mance. Examples to this effect might easily be multi- plied. But an essay on the fictions of the Greeks v.ould * Joannes Magnus, Hist. Gotliorum. 22 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. be foreign to the scope of this publication : and it would be absurd to enter upon a critical investigation of a series of stories, extended by some chronologers over seven centuries, from the foundation of Argos to the Trojan war, while Newton contracts them within a century and a half, which tell of little but bloodshed, abductions, and violence of all sorts, intermixed, however, with notices of those who invented the useful arts and fostereil the gradual progress of civilization. As we approach to the Trojan war, a sort of twilight history begins to dawn upon us. It is to what may seem at first the strongholds of fiction, to the exploits of Hercules and Theseus, that we refer. The earliest ascertained fact is the establishment of a regular government by Minos, who also cleared the sea from pirates. At no long interval the above-named heroes made another step in civilization ; they cleared the land from rapine, as Minos had cleared the sea. Other men, roaming in search of adventures, had carried bloodshed through the land at the suggestion of their passions or for the advancement of their lame ; but Hercules first traversed the earth with the express design of avenging the oppressed and exterminating their oppressors, and the example was soon after followed by his kinsman Theseus, Their exploits, of course, are chiefly fabulous : but it is worthy of observation that those of Theseus approach much nearer to probability than the far-famed labours of Her- cules. Indeed the history of the former presents this peculiarity, that the accounts of his youth are consistent, and scarcely improbable, while those of his age run into all the extravagance of romance. Theseus, travelling from Troezen to Athens, was strongly urged to go by sea, the way by land being beset with robbers and murderers. He refused to do so, being inflamed with emulation of Hercules' renown ; and on the journey signalized him- self by slaying Sinnis, surnamed the Pine-bender, because he dismembered travellers by tying them to the tops of trees forcibly brought together and then allowed to start asunder ; Procrustes, who exhibited a passion for uni- formity worthy a German general of the old school, in HERCULES AND THESEUS. 23 reducing all men to the measure of his own bed, bj'- stretching those who wTre too short, and docking those who were too long ; together with others of less note, and similar habits. That Plutarch believed in these stories is evident, from the tone in which he recites them ; a corroboration, indeed, of no great weight, for he pro- ceeds with equal gravity to relate things which no one will credit ; but in this instance his account of the state of Greece gives warranty for his belief, and is itself confirmed by our knowledge of later ages. The passage has often been quoted, but it is striking and to the pur- pose, and its want of novelty, therefore, shall be no bar to its insertion. " The w'orld at that time brought forth men, which for strongness in their arms, for swiftness of their feet, and for a general strength of the whole body, did far pass the common force of others, and were never weary for any labour or travail they took in hand. But for all this, they never employed these gifts of nature to any honest or profitable thing ; but rather delighted villainously to hurt and wrong others ; as if all the fruit and profit of their extraordinary strength had consisted in cruelty and violence only, and to be able to keep others under and in subjection ; and to force, destroy, and spoil all that came to their hands. Thinking that the more part of those which think it a shame to do ill, and commend justice, equity, and humanity, do it of faint, cowardly hearts, because they dare not wrong- others, for fear they should receive wrong themselves ; and, therefore, that they which by might could have vantage over others, had nothing to do with such quali- ties."'* The enormities ascribed to Sinnis and his fellows have discredited the whole train of adventures to which they belong ; but this is an untenable ground of doubt. He who reads descriptions of the state of England, before * We quote here, and in future, from Sir Thomas North's translation, a.d. 1579. North translated from the French of Amyot, His version has been compared with the oi'iginal, and corrected. 24 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. laws were strong enough to control private violence, given by contemporaries who saw what they relate, and whose narratives bear the impress of sincerity, will better appreciate the extent of human ferocity. In the reign of Stephen disorder was at its height. " The barons cruelly oppressed the wretched men of the land with castle-works, and when the castles were made, they filled them with devils and evil men. Then took they those whom they supposed to have any goods, both by night and day, labouring men and women, and threw, them into the prison for their gold and silver, and in- flicted on them unutterable tortures : for never were any martyrs so tortured as they were. Some they hanged up by the feet, and smoked them with foul smoke, and some by the thumbs, or the head, and hung coats of mail on their feet. They tied knotted cords about their heads, and twisted them until the pain wont to their brains. They put them into dungeons where were adders, and snakes, and toads, and so destroyed them. Some they placed in a crucet house ; that is, in a chest that was short and narrow, and not deep, wherein they put sharp stones, and so thrust the man therein, that they broke all the limbs. In many of the castles were things loathsome and grim, called Sachenteges, of which two or three men had enough to bear one. They were thus made : they were fastened to a beam, having a sharp iron to go about a man's throat, so that he could in no direction either sit, or lie, or sleep, but bear all that iron. Many thou- sands they wore out with hunger. I neither can, nor may I tell all the wounds and pains which they inflicted on wretched men in this land."* " Some, seeing the sweetness of their country turned into bitterness, went into foreign parts : others built hovels about churches in hope of security, and there passed life in fear and pain, subsisting for lack of food (for famine was felt dreadfully over all England) upon the forbidden and unused flesh of dogs and horses, or relieving hunger with raw herbs and roots, until throughout the provinces * Ingram's Saxon Chronicle. STATE OF ENGLAND. men, wasted by famine, died in crowds, or went volun- tarily with their families into a miserable exile. You might see towns of famous name, standing lonely, and alto- gether emptied by the death of their inliabitants of all ages and sexes ; the fields whitening mider a thriving- harvest, but the husbandman cut off by pestilential famine ere it ripened : and all England wore the face of grief and calamity, of misery and oppression. In addition to these evils, the savage multitude of barbarians who re- sorted to England for the gains of warfare was moved neither by the bowels of piety nor by any feeling of human compassion for such misery : everywhere they conspired from their castles to do all wickedness, being always at leisure to rob the poor, to promote quarrels, and intent everywhere upon slaughter with all the malice of a wicked mind." Even churchmen amused them- selves with these pastimes. '* The bishops themselves, as I am ashamed to say, not all indeed, but many of them, clad in handsome armour, rode up and down on prancing horses with these upsetters of their country ; shared in their booty ; exposed to fetters, or torture, knights, or any wealthy persons soever, whom they intercepted ; and being themselves the head and cause of all this wicked- ness, they threw the blame not on themselves, but only upon their followers."* Enough of general descriptions, which are fully borne out by the particulars related. " In the reign of Stephen, Robert, the son of Hubert, had gotten possession of the castle of Devizes. He v/as a man exceeding all within memory in barbarity and blasphemy, who used freely to make boast, that he had been present when twenty-lour monks wove burnt together with their church, and profess that he would do as much in England, and ruin utterly the abbey of Malmesbury. If he ever dismissed a prisoner unransomed, and without the torture, which very seldom happened, at such times, when they thanked him in God's name, I have with these ears heard him answer, ' God will never own the obligation to me.' He would expose * Gesta Stephani, ap. Duchesne, Script. Nermann, p. 9G1, 2. 26 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. his captives naked to the burning sun, anointed with honey, to attract flies, and such other tormenting in- sects."* This worthy met with a fit end, being taken and hanged ; but this act of retribution was one of illegal violence, being done by a knight who held Marlborough Castle, without a shadow of authority, and apparently on the principle that any one had aright to abate a nuisance. '' In these times (the reign of William Rufus) men come not to great name but by the highest wickedness. Thomas, a great baron near Laudun in France, was great in name, because he was extreme in wickedness. At enmity with the surrounding churches, he had brought all their wealth into his own exchequer. If any one by force or guile were holden in his keeping, truly might that man say, ' the pains of hell got hold ujion me.' Murder was his glory and delight. Against all usage, he placed a countess in a dungeon, whom the foul ruf- fian harassed with fetters and torments to extort money. He w^ould speak words of peace to his neighbour, and stab him to the heart with a smile, and hence, under his cloak, he more often wore his sword naked than sheathed. Therefore, men feared, respected, worshipped him. All through France was he spoken of. Daily did his estate, his treasure, his vassalage increase. AVouldst thou hear the end of this villain ? Being stricken with a sword unto death, refusing to repent, and turning away his head from the Lord's body, in such manner he perished : so that it might well be said, ' Befitting to joiw life was that death.' You have seen Robert de Belesme, a Norman baron, who when established in his castle was Pluto, Megaera, Cerberus, or anything that can be named more dreadful. He took pains not to dismiss, but to dis- patch his captives. Pretending to be in play, he put out his son's eyes with his thumbs, while he was muffled up in a cloak ; he impaled persons of both sexes. Horrid slaughter was as a meat pleasant to his soul : therefore was he found in all men's mouths, so that the wonderful doings of Robert de Belesme passed into proverbs. Let * William of Malmesbuvy, Hist. Novell, lib. ii. STATE OF ENGLAND. 2/ US come at length to the end. He \vho had afflicted others in prison, being at last thrown into prison by King Henry, ended his wicked life by an enduring punishment."* It was this state of disorder which produced knight- errantry, and there is nothing absurd in believing that equal lawlessness in another country was checked by the same sort of interference. The reality of knight-errantry has, indeed, been questioned ; it has been pronounced a fiction, suited to the wants of the period in which it was supposed to exist. If this were so, and the tales of Hercules and Theseus equally groundless, it would still be curious to see that men had been led to imagine the same means of making amends for the Mant of an ex- ecutive power : but we do not believe this to be the case. The romances gave system and consistency to the scattered acts of individuals ; they described the better qualities of knighthood in their own days, and filled up the picture with imaginary virtues and preter-human prowess, attributes which men are always ready to con- fer on their ancestors, as Nestor makes the heroes with whom he fought in youth far superior to those M'hom he lectured in old age, and Homer endows those who fought under Troy M'ith the strength of three or four men, ^•'such as mortals now are." But their productions bear the stamp of copies, not originals, and it is not very easy to believe that they would have invented, or their audi- ence and readers relished, characters and rules of action for which their own experience gave no ^^'arrant. There is, however, a double Theseus, of historic as well as legendary fame. In his latter capacity, both for the degree of reality and the nature of his exploits, he may be compared to Arthur ; in his former, still to draw an illustration from British history, he is not unworthy to be placed by the side of Alfred. The union of these two, discordant as it may appear, is not more so than that of the poetic and the historical Theseus. Alfred, indeed, signalised his military talents in many hard- * Henry of Huntingdon, De Episcopis sui temporis. 28 illSTOElCAL. TAEAJLLELS. fought fields, but his victories were those of a general : the exploits of Theseus were those of a knight. But among- the mass of stories of questionable truth or un- questioned falsehood relating to him, it is generally ac- knowledged that this man, whose very existence we might else have doubted, was the author of extensive and judicious reforms in government, such as proved the foundation of Attic greatness: ;reforms which he efl'ectod by the rarest and most virtuous of all sacrifices, the resignation of his own power.* Attica was divided into twelve districts, shires v\e might call them, except that, taken all together, they were less than one of the larger English counties. Professedly forming one body, and owning a precarious obedience to one prince, they had still their petty and contlicting interests, and could with difficulty be induced to concur in any measures for the benefit of the whole. Theseus, encouraged by the popularity which he had gained by delivering Athens from its subjection to Crete, f undertook to substitute a better polity. " He went through the several towns, and persuaded the inhabitants to give up their separate councils and magistrates, and submit to a common juris- diction. Every man was to retain his dwelling and his property as before ; but justice was to be administered and all public business transacted at Athens. The mass of the people came into his measures, and to subdue the reluctance of the powerful, who were loath to resign the importance accruing from the local magis- tracies, he gave up much of his own authority, reserving- only the command of the army, and the care of watching over the execution of the laws. Opposition was silenced by his liberality, together with the fear of his power, ability, and courage, and the union of Attica was eflected * Perhaps this is too positively asserted. No doubt exists as to the political operation, but it has been questioned whether Theseus had a more real existence than the other heroes who gave their names to, or were named after, the several Athenian tribes. See Arnold's Thucyd., Appendix 11. t History of Greece, p. 5. STATE or EXGLA>D. 29 by him and made lasting-. To bind it closer, without disturbing the religious observances of the several towns, he instituted a common festival in honour of Minerva, which was called the feast of union, and {Panatliencea^ the feast of all the Athenians."* This process bears some resemblance to the consoli- dation of the Saxon Heptarchy, nominally effected by Egbert, but completed and made truly beneficial by Alfred. The evils which were to be reformed were very different in the two cases : at Athens civil dissen- sion was to be remedied ; in England a rude people, intermixed with foreign barbarians more ferocious than themselves, and reduced to poverty by a series of de- structive invasions, required a strong curb for the re-es- tablishment of order and security. We must not expect, therefore, to find any resemblance between their insti- tutions : the Saxons required no measures to prevent civil war, and inspire a spirit of nationality ; the Athe- nians, though well inclined to civil broils, respected, from the earliest dawn of history, the security of pro- perty, and in consecj[uence far outstripped the rest of Greece in wealth and refinement. Nevertheless the names of these princes may fairly be selected to adorn the same page : both advanced beyond their age in legislative and political science ; both directed their wisdom, power, and popularity to truly noble ends ; and therefore merit the respect of all who believe rank and office to have been instituted for other ends than for the advantage of those who possess them. We have spoken of Hercules and Theseus as indicating the commencement of Grecian histor3^ Previous to them, facts are mentioned which we have no ground to disbelieve, as the various settlements by Phoenician or Egyptian :emigrants ; but all further particulars of these persons, with the exception of Minos, are of such a na- ture, that where we find no internal evidence to pronounce them fabulous we can yet assign but scanty reasons for re- lying confidently upon their truth. But about this era our * History of Greece, p. 6. 30 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. knowledge begins to increase. We must refer to it an event of which it is not easy to fix the date with certainty ; namely, the celebrated Argonautic expedition, in which both these heroes are said to have joined : a statement, however, irreconcileablc with the .accounts of Theseus' introduction to iEgeus, and the plot formed against him by Medea.* Without troubling ourselves to account for these discrepancies, it is evident that the expedition, if it ever took place, wdiich there seems reason to believe in spite of Bryant's opposition, who would ascribe this, and almost all other legends, to some faint traditions of the deluge and preservation of Noah, must have borne a close resemblance to the Danish piratical ex- cursions which we have already described. Not long after occurs the first confederate war mentioned in Grecian history, that of the Seven against Thebes ;t an event so closely connected with mythology that its reality might reasonably be questioned, but for the testimony of Homer and Hesiod. The revolting nature of the struggle between two brothers, for the kingdom of a banished, miserable, and neglected father, would incline us indeed to give as little credit to the concluding tragedy of the house of Lai us, as to the series of crimes and misery by which that house had been polluted : but all arguments founded upon the horrors of such fratricidal warfare fall to the ground, Vvhen in the brightest j)eriod of chivalry we find it revived with no less rancour, and * The arrival of Theseus at Athens roused Medea's jea- lousy, and she proposed to poison him. She did not arrive at Atlaens until some time after she had reached Greece with Jason and the Argonauts; while the journey of Theseus from Troezen to Athens appears to have been his first ex- ploit. Either, therefore, Theseus was not an Argonaut, or this charge against Medea is ungrounded. t Eteocles and Polynices, the sons of CEdipus, agreed, after the expulsion of their father, to reign alternate years in Thebes. Eteocles, however, at the end of the first year, refused to surrender his power, upon which Polynices laid siege to the city, assisted by six other princes. The brothers met in battle, and fell by eacli other's hands. PEDRO OF CASTILE. ol a no less fatal end, and the flower of French knighthood a calm spectator, nay, almost an actor in the scene. The strife between Don Pedro of Castile, and his brother Henry of Transtamara, the deadly struggle in which Pedro, who had already slain one brother, fell, when defeated and a prisoner, by the dagger of another against whom his own hand was armed, involve circum- stances of horror scarce less adapted to dramatic effect than those legends which have so often employed the Greek tragedians. Don Pedro was the legitimate heir to the crown of Castile. Don Henry and Don Fadrique (or Frederick) were his half-brothers by Donna Leonora de Guzman, whom their father had entertained as his mistress, and even proclaimed queen, during the life-time of his lawful wife. When Pedro succeeded to the throne, at his mother's instigation he put her rival to death : his bro- thers, Henry and Fadrique, escaped, and the former re- nounced his allegiance : the latter fled into Portugal ; but after some time he made his peace, returned, and was appointed master of the order of St. lago. When several months had elapsed, he was invited to join the court at Seville, and take his share in the amusements of an approaching tournament. He accepted the invita- tion, but was sternly and ominously received, and imme- diately executed within the palace. The friends of Pedro asserted, that the king had, that ver}^ day, detected Don Fadrique in a correspondence with his brother Henry and the Arragonese ; while popular belief at- tributed the slaughter of the master to the influence of Pedro's mistress, Maria de Padilla. The circumstances of this event are powerfully described in one of the Spanish ballads, so admirably translated by Mr. Lock- hart. There is a peculiarity of construction in the ballad , the person of the narrator being changed in the course of it. It is commenced by the victim himself, who de- scribes the alacrity with which he obeyed his brother's summons. c 2 32 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. I sat alone in Coimbra— the town myself had ta'en, — When came into my chamber a messenger from Spain : There was no treason in his look, an honest look he wore, I from his hand the letter took — my brother's seal it bore. *' Come, brother dear, the day draws near ('twas thus bespoke the king) For plenar court and nightly sport, within the listed ring." Alas, unhappy master, I easy credence lent : Alas, for fast and faster I at his bidding went. When I set out from Coimbra, and passed the bounds of Spain, I had a goodly company of spearmen in my train ; A gallant force, a score of horse, and sturdy mules thirteen ; With joyful heart I held my course, my years were young and green. A journey of good fifteen days within the week was done, I halted not, though signs I got, dark tokens many a one ; A strong stream mastered horse and mule, I lost a poniard fine, And left a page within the pool, a faithful page of mine. Yet on to proud Seville T rode — when to the gate I came, Before it stood a man of God to warn me from the same : The words he spake I would not hear, his grief I would not see ; <' I seek," I said, " my brother dear — I will not stop for thee." No lists were'closed upon the sand, for royal tourney dight. No pawing horse was seen to stand, I saw no armed knight : Yet aye I gave my mule the spur, and hasted through the town, I stopt before his palace-door, then gaily leapt I down. They shut the door — my trusty score of friends were left behind ; I would not hear their whispered fear, no harm was in my mind ; I greeted Pedro, but he turned — I wot his look was cold ; His brother from his knee he spixrned — " Stand ofr, thou mas- ter bold. " Stand ofP, stand off, thou traitor strong !" 'twas thus he sai to me, " Thy time on earth shall not be long — what brings thee to my knee ? PEDRO or CASTILE. 33 My lady craves a new year's gift, and I will keep my word ; Thy head methiuks may serve the shift — good yeoman, draw thy sword — " The master lay upon the floor, ere well that word was said, Then in a charger off they bore his pale and bloody head. They brought it to Padilla's chair, they bowed them on the knee — " King Pedro greets thee, lady fair, his gift he sends to thee." She gazed upon the master's head, her scorn it could not scare. And cruel were the words she spoke, and proud her glances were. " Thou now shalt pay, thou traitor base, the debt of many a year. My dog shall lick that haughty face, no' more that lip shall sneer.' She seized it by the clotted hair, and o'er the window flung : The mastiff" smelt it in his lair, forth at her cry he sprung ; The mastiff that had crouched so low, to lick the master's hand. He tossed the morsel to and fro, and licked it on the sand. And ever as the mastiff tore, his bloody teeth were shown. With growl and snort he made his sport, and picked it to the bone ! The baying of the beast was loud ; and swiftly on the street There gathered round a gaping crowd to see the mastiff eat. Then out and spake King Pedro — " What governance is this ? The rabble rout the gate without torment my dogs, I wiss." Then out and spake King Pedro's page — " It is the master's head, The mastiff tears it in his rage, therewith they have him fed." Then out and spake the ancient nurse, that nursed the bro- thers twain — " On thee. King Pedro, lies the curse ; thy brother thou hast slain ; A thousand harlots there may be within the realms of Spain, But where is she can give to thee thy brother back again ?" Came darkness o'er King Pedro's brow, when thus he heard her say ; He sorely rued the accursed vow he had fulfilled that day ; o4 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. He passed unto his paramour, where on her couch she lay. Leaning from out her painted bower, to see the mastiff's play. He drew her to a dungeon dark, a dungeon strong and deep ; " My father's sou lies stiif and stark, aud^there are few to weep. Fadrique's blood for vengeance calls, his cry is in mine ear; Tliou art the cause, thou harlot false ; in darkness lie thou here." After Pedro had alienated his people's hearts by his cruelty, Don Henry returned with a formidable body of French auxiliaries. At first the fortune of the rightful owner of the throne, who was supported by Edward the Black Prince, prevailed, and the invader was obliged to retire back to France : but suddenly renewing the attack, assisted by Du Guesclin, the flower of French knight- hood, after the English auxiliaries had quitted Spain, he defeated and took prisoner his brother. Upon entering the chamber where he was confined, Henry exclaimed, " Where is that whoreson and Jew, who calls himself King of Castile ?" Pedro, as proud and fearless as he was cruel, stepped instantly forward, and replied, " Here I stand, the lawful son and heir of Don Alphonso, and it is thou that art^but a false bastard." The rival bro- thers instantly grappled like lions ; the French knights, and Du Guesclin himself, looking on. Henry drew his poniard, and wounded Pedro in the face, but his body was protected by a coat of mail. A violent struggle ensued. Henry I'ell across a bench, and his brother, being uppermost, had Mell nigh mastered him, when^one of Henry's followers seizing Don Pedro by the leg, turned him over, and his master thus at length gaining the upper hand, instantly stabbed the king to the heart. Menard, in his history of Du Guesclin, says that, while nil around gazed like statues on the furious struggle of the brothers, Du Guesclin exclaimed to this attendant of Henry, " What! will you stand by, and see your PEDRO or CASTILE. 35 master i:)laced at such a pass by a false renegade ? Make forward and help him, for well you may."* At Athens, the poets who contended for the tragic prize, were expected to exhibit three pieces, which, from their number, were called collectively a trilogy, together with a fourth, satirical, drama, which came last in the order of representation, like our farces now. Often they chose for the argument of these tragedies different events in the same story, so that the three formed a connected whole: of which an instance, the only instance extant, j'emains in the Agamemnon, Choephoroi, and Eumenides of iEsehylus. The tale which has just been narrated is well fitted for this kind of representation, and would fur- nish materials not unworthy even of that poet's genius. In the first play we may imagine an insulted queen and deserted wife, brooding over past injuries, rejoicing in the prospect of revenge, and urging the savage temper of her son to seek it in the blood of those who should have been dearest to him ; the play terminating with the death of Leonora de Guzman, and the escape of her sons, preserved, like Orestes, to be at once the ministers of vengeance and the instruments of further crime. For the second the unsuspecting confidence of Don Fadrique, his rejection of the signs and warnings, which were offered in vain, and the successful machinations of a wicked, perhaps a rejected woman, acting upon the proud and cruel Pedro, are well suited ; while the chorus would find a fitting part, at first, in dark and indistinct presages of evil, and lamentations over the blindness with which the fated victim rushed into the snare ; and at the end, in indignant description of the circumstances of horror narrated in the ballad, and in joining the aged nurse ^to bewail the death of her foster son, and denouncing ven- geance upon the murderer's head. The third would contain the capture of Pedro, the mutual defiance and death-struggle of the brothers, and the barbarous ex- posure by Henry of his brother's corpse : while at the end the impression of these horrors might be relieved by * Lockhart's Spanish Ballads. 36 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. the constant love of Maria de Padilla, who, now neglected and despised, still watched over the forsaken body other monarch and lover, with a fidelity worthy of a purer bosom.* We reach at length the Trojan war, the point assumed * See a subsequent ballad in the same collection : — In her hot cheek the blood mounts high, as she stands gazing down Now on proud Henry's royal state, his robe and golden crown, And now upon the trampled cloak, that hides not from her view The slaughtered Pedro's marble brow, and lips of livid hue. Away she flings her garments, her broidered veil and vest. As if they should behold her love within her lovely breast — As if to call upon her foes the constant heart to see Where Pedro's form is still enshrined, and evermore shall be. But none on fair Maria looks, by none her breast is seen, Save angry heaven, remembering well the murder of the Queen ; The wounds of jealous harlot rage, which virgin blood must staimch. And all the scorn that mingled in the bitter cup of Blanch. The utter coldness of neglect that haughty spirit stings, As if ten thousand fiends were there, with all their flapping wings. She wraps the veil about her head, as if 'twere all a dream. The love — the murder — and the wrath — and that rebel- lious scream. For still there's shouting on the plain, and spurring far and nigh ; " God save the King — Amen ! Amen ! King ll^enry ! " is the cry, While Pedro all alone is left upon his bloody bier — Not one remains to cry to God, " Our Lord lies mur- dered here." TEOJAX WAK. 37 by Thucydidcs for the commencement of his sketch of Grecian history : a circumstance alone sufficient to discre- dit the scepticism of those who beheve it to be a mere fabu- lous legend. The universal voice of antiquity testifies to its reality, and we know not of any arguments strong enough to shake this testimony. Herodotus, on the authority of the Persians, mentions the Rape of Helen as one of a series of reprisals consequent upon the aggression of the Phoenicians, who carried off lo ; the cause and commencement of hostility between the Greeks and the Asiatic nations. The former were clearly in the wrong, in the opinion of the Persians, both because the rape of Helen only balanced accounts, and because the Greeks made such injuries a ground ibr war. " Up to that time they confined themselves to mutual depredations ; but the Greeks set the example of carrying war from one conti- nent to the other. Now, to carry off" women is the act of rogues ; but to be over eager to avenge their loss is the part of fools ; and wise men will take no thought for them after they are gone : ior it is plain that they would not have been run away with, except with their own good w^ill. And in truth, say the Persians, the Asiatics made no account of the carrying oif their women : but the Greeks collected a mighty armament on account of a Laceda?monian female, and then came to Asia, to pull down the empire of Priam ! "* So thought the Persians. Herodotus confesses that he is not prepared to say how these things took place, and sets us the example of hast- ening to ground which he can tread with some certainty. That there is no intrinsic improbability in the story, has already been asserted by Mitford, on the giound of its close analogy to an incident in the history of the British islands. Dermod Mac Morough (or Mac Murchad), prince of * Herod, i. 4. It may be inferred from hence that the high estimation of female chastity, and implacable resentment consequent upon injuries in that respect, which now charac- terise Eastern manners, did not prevail in the age of Hero- dotus. That these feelings did prevail at a very remote period, appears from the story of Darius and Alexander. c 3 38 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. Leinster, was attached to Dervorghal, wife of Tiernan O'Ruark, another Irish chief, who held the county of Leitrim, with some adjacent districts, — a lady of great beauty, but small virtue, who took advantage of her husband's being driven into hiding by O'Connor, who was then predominant in Ireland, to elope with her lover. " An outrage of this kind was not always regarded with abhorrence by the Irish ; they considered it rather as an act of pardonable gallantry, or such an offence as a reason- able pecuniary compensation might atone for. But the sullen and haughty prince, provoked more by the inso- lence and treachery of his ravisher than the infidelity of his wife, conceived the most determined animosity against Dermod. He practised secretly with O'Connor, promised the most inviolable attachment to his interest, and pre- vailed on him, not onl}' to reinstate him in his possessions, but to revenge the insult of IMac Morough, whom he represented, and justly, as a faithless vassal, really devoted to the service of his rival. The King of Connaught led his forces into Leinster, rescued Dervorghal from her paramour, and restored her to her friends ; with whom she lived, if not in a state of reconciliation with her husband, at least in that opulence and splendour which enabled her to atone for the crime of infidelity, by the usual method of magnificent donations to the church."* This domestic squabble led to more than usually import- ant results, for the expelled Dermod applied to our Henry II. for assistance, and the conquest of Ireland followed. The ambition of Agamemnon, however, is regarded by Thucydides as the cause of the war ; the abduction of Helen served only as the pretext. "To me it seemeth that Agamemnon got together that fleet, not so much for that he had with him the suitors of Helena, bound thereto by oath to Tyndareus, as for that he exceeded the rest in power. For Atreus, after that Eurystheus was slain by the IIeraclidi3e, obtained the kingdom of Mycenae, and whatever else had been under him, for himself. To which greatness Agameuinon succeeding-, and also far excelling * Leland's Hist. Ireland. TKOJAN WAE. 39 the rest in shipping-, took that war in hand, as I conceive it, and assembled the said forces, not so much on favour as by fear. For it is clear, that he himself both conferred most ships to that action, and that some also he lent to the Arcadians. And this is likewise confirmed by Homer[(if any think his testimony sufficient), who, at the delivery of the sceptre unto him, calleth him, ' Of many isles, and of all Argos king.' "* Argos here signifies the %vhole peninsula, called afterwards Peloponnesus. It is plain, however, from Homer, that the sovereignty here ascribed to him was of a most uncertain and insecure tenure ; that his subordinate princes were in fact inde- pendent within their own dominions, and were too high spirited and powerful to be maltreated with impunity. Altogether, without the elaborate machinery of the feudal system, the power and influence of Agamemnon seem to have resembled that possessed by the kings of France, and emperors of Germany, over those great vassals who held whole provinces, and singly or united often proved an overmatch for their sovereign. Here ends the Mythic age. We shall pass over the next three, or according to most chronologers the next five centuries, which are but partially filled up by notices of events, such as the return of the Ileraclidse, the gradual subversion of monar(;hy throughout Greece, and the great emigrations which peopled the Asiatic coast with a Hellenic race. About the sixth century b.c. we begin to reap the benefit of contemporary authorities ; and thenceforward history, if not free from an admixture of fiction, at least runs with a copious and uninterrupted stream. * Thucyd. i. 9. 40 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. CHAPTER II. Avistomenes.* — Hereward le Wake. — Wallace. Sparta had not long acquired strength under the insti- tutions of Lycurgus, before she discovered that thirst of dominion which distinguished her after-history. The neighbouring state of Messenia was the first to suffer. As usual, it is hard to say which party gave the first provocation ; but if the Lacedaemonians were ever in the right, they lost that advantage when, in time of peace, with studied secrecy they bound themselves never to return home until Messenia was conquered ; and when, without the formality of a declaration of war, they stormed by night Ami)heia, a frontier town, and put the unprepared inhabitants to the sword. Their enterprise succeeded better than its iniquity merited ; for after a vigorous and protracted defence Messenia was subdued, and continued in servitude for fortj' years. At the end of that time a new race had grown up, ignorant of the evils of war, and too high-spirited to bear their degrada- tion tamely. A gallant leader is seldom wanting to gal- lant men engaged in a good cause ; and Aristomenes might serve as a type for all later heroes, whose exploits * Pausanias evidently founded his account of Aristomenes upon the traditions and legendary ballads of the Messenians ; which, probably, were about as historical as Chevy Chase, or the Spanish ballads of the Cid, and other celebrated war- riors. The reader will be on his guard, therefore, against taking all that is here told for veracious history : but we have not attempted to discriminate accurately between truth and fiction, which would entirely destroy the spirit and romance of the narrative, very probably without coming nearer to the reality. ARISTOMEXES. 41 belong' to the debateable ground which lies between truth and fiction. He was a young Messenian of the royal line, according to the report of his countrymen ; but other Greeks, with a more unbounded admiration, related that the hero Pyrrhus,"son of Achilles, was his father. His valour, at least, did not disgrace his reputed parentage ; and, though daring in extremity even to des- peration, was not of that blind and foolish kind which hurries unprepared into action, and sacrifices a good cause to the vanity and temerity of its sui)porters. Before taking the field, he secured the co-operation of Argos and Arcadia, to support and strengthen the eager spirit of his countrymen, and then, with a force entirely Mes- senian, attacked the Lacedaemonians at a place called Derae. The event was doubtful ; but that a conquered people should meet its masters in battle, and part from them on equal terms, was in itself equivalent to a victory. Aristomenes is said to have performed deeds beyond human prowess, and was rewarded by his grateful coun- trymen with a summons to the vacant throne. He de- clined the dignity, but accepted of the power under the title of commander-in-chief. His next exploit was of a singular and romantic cast, such as would befit a knight of the court of Arthur, or * Pausanias merely says tliat the Greeks in general be- lieved Pyrrhus to be his father. We have no doubt, from the context, that the hero is the person meant, though the passage has been otherwise interpreted. The practice of deifying eminent men prevailed in Gi'eece at an early period, though apparently not in the age of Hesiod and Homer. Homer is fond indeed of dweUing on the superiority of the past ; a superiority referred to the celestial descent of the heroes who then flourished ; but he gives us no reason to think that divine honours were paid them. In later times, a patron hero was as necessary to a Grecian, as a patron saint formerly to a European city : and there are few names of eminence in the heroic age, in honour of which temples have not been built, and sacred rites instituted. The twelve Athenian tribes had each its protecting hero : ^acus and his descendants were believed to preside over ^gina and Salamis, It is needless to multiply examples. 42 HISTORICAL PARALLELS. Charlemagne, or the less fabulous, but scarce less romantic era of Froissart, better than it assorts with modern notions of a general's or a sovereign's duties. Considering it important to alarm the Spartans, and im.press them with a formidable idea of his personal qualities, he traversed Laconia, and entered Sparta by night, which, in obedience to Lycurgus' precepts, was unwalled and unguarded, to suspend from the temple of Pallas a shield, inscribed " Aristomenes from the Spartan spoils dedicates this to the goddess."* Violence was not offered, and his object, _ * Probably this story is founded on the theft of the Palla- dium by night from Troy, by Ulysses and Diomed. A similar spirit of chivalrous daring, mingled with supei-stition, suggested a similar enterprise to Fernando Perez del Pulgar, surnamed 'of the Exploits,' when serving at the siege of