LIBRARY 
 
 KBUVERSn Y OF CALIFORNIA 
 DAVIS 
 
BLUNT'S PROLIFIC. 
 

On Ensilage 
 
 OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS 
 In Silos. 
 
 EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE AT ECHO DALE FARM; 
 
 ALSO THE PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE OF 
 
 Twenty-five Practical Farmers 
 
 WITH ENSILAGE AND SILOS, 
 
 Giving their experience of feeding stock of all kinds with Ensilage, and 
 
 the practical results, conclusively showing the undoubted success of 
 
 this process, the Ensilage of green forage crops. By this 
 
 process the farmer can realize five dollars in place of one 
 
 dollar as practised by the old system of farming. 
 
 Also wonderful experiments of feeding poultry, 
 
 at one-half the usual cost, on Ensilage. 
 
 By 
 
 H. R. STEVENS, 
 
 Proprietor of " Echo Dale Farm" Dover, Mass. 
 
 BOSTON: 
 
 PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR. 
 1881. 
 
COPYRIGHT, 1881, 
 BY HENRY R. STEVENS. 
 
 Electrotyped and Printed by Rand, A-very, <5r Co. 
 II-] Franklin Street, Boston. 
 
TO 
 
 PROFESSOR J. M. M^BRYDE, 
 
 AND MY OTHER CORRESPONDENTS, 
 
 WHO HAVE KINDLY AIDED ME IN THIS WORK BY THEIR PRACTICAL 
 
 EXPERIENCE, I RESPECTFULLY DEDICATE 
 
 THIS BOOK. 
 
INTRODUCTION. 
 
 IN placing a publication of this kind upon the subject of ensilage, 
 I do not claim to have invented or made any improvements upon the 
 original practical experience as perfected, after years of many expe- 
 riments, by M. Auguste Goffart of France. To him alone belongs 
 the honor. In my opinion the dawn of day is upon us, and the sun- 
 shine will spread its golden rays upon the farmer on the practical 
 workings of preserving our green crops by ensilage. 
 
 Mr. J. B. Brown of New York translated the publication upon the 
 subject of ensilage, by M. Auguste Goffart. I obtained this book 
 from the first, read it carefully and thoroughly. I then resolved to 
 build a silo, and try the experiment. As the surrounding farmers 
 said, after they learned what I was going to do, " You can afford to 
 lose it if it does not work well, and I don't believe it will." With 
 their consolation I did try it, built an experimental silo capable of 
 holding forty tons, filled it with green-corn fodder, and it proved a 
 complete success. 
 
 And yet many farmers say to-day, " I do not believe it will work 
 half of the time." I then thought they needed some practical expe- 
 rience from a number of practical farmers. I concluded I would 
 publish a work upon the subject of ensilage, giving the practical 
 experience of practical farmers as well as my own. I made arrange- 
 ments to find out the practical farmers who had the courage to enter 
 into this comparatively new enterprise. I have either visited or cor- 
 responded with thirty-seven different parties, mostly farmers, who 
 8 
 
INTRODUCTION. 
 
 have built silos, and filled or partly filled the same with ensilage ; 
 and, when you have read the practical experience of these men, you 
 cannot doubt of the perfect success of preserving our green crops by 
 ensilage ; and, when you can earn two dollars at half the expense 
 that you before earned one dollar, you will believe and practise it 
 after you have read this book carefully, and you will build a silo, 
 and meet with the same success as my correspondents have. You 
 will then be as enthusiastic upon the practical workings of ensilage 
 as they are to-day ; and to the farmer of New England it will add 
 millions, and may well be called a revolution in farming. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 WHAT MAKES THE FARMER HAPPY? 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Advantages of ensilage. The farmer can earn two dollars at half the ex- 
 pense he before earned one dollar. Great advantages to the farmer and 
 his stock in the winter. Milk of December equal to milk in June; rich 
 butter and fine flavor in winter. Condition and health of cattle. 
 Advantage of ensilage in all weathers 18 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 "SILO," "ENSILAGE," DEFINED. 
 
 Description and definition of "silo." " Ensilage." Origin of the word 
 
 "silo." The term "ensilage" applied by the French .... 19 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM J. M. M^BRYDE. TREATISE ON ORIGIN AND 
 PROCESS OF ENSILAGE. 
 
 Origin of ensilage. "What G off art claims to have developed or discovered. 
 
 Process described before Goffart began his experiments. Ensilage 
 was tried successfully; facts and particulars given. An old process 
 revived. This system is no longer an experiment, but a perfect success. 
 
 What it promises to do for agriculture 20 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 LOCATION OF SILOS. 
 
 Locations, convenience, saving of labor, and feeding of stock. Description 
 of different locations. Advantage of some locations over others. 
 Other descriptions of silos. Facts in regard to best preservation of 
 ensilage 23 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 BUILDING OF SILOS OF D1FERENT SIZES AND FORMS, GIVING 
 CAPACITY AND CONTENTS OF SAME. 
 
 Material most suitable for building silos. Construction of silos in the 
 earth by digging trenches. Various experiments of different forms and 
 kinds; most successful one given. Diagram and description of silo; 
 diagram of silo with two compartments, full description given. Sizes 
 of silo; capacity, and number of stock it will feed. Full description 
 given how to build silos ; diagram for the foundation ; also diagram 
 showing how to build walls. Showing quantities and proportions of 
 cement, lime, gravel, stone ; giving full particulars, so that any farmer 
 can build a silo. Description of other silos already built ; diagrams 
 
 given. Sectional silos 25 
 
 10 
 
CONTENTS. 11 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 MY PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE AT ECHO DALE FARM WITH ENSILAGE 
 
 AND SILOS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Why I built a silo. Ensilaging of rye and grass. Filling a silo. Kind of 
 corn, and quantity per acre planted. Building of silo, location of silo, 
 dimensions and capacity. Material used. First time the farmer fills 
 a silo. Kind of fodder-cutter and power used. Description of start- 
 ing with horse-power. Number of men, and how employed in filling 
 silo. Quantity cut per day for ensilage. Full description of filling and 
 covering ensilage in silo. Best time to cut corn-fodder for ensilage. 
 Chemical changes of ensilage. Opening of silo, and condition of ensi- 
 lage. Changes of ensilage after taken from silo. Feeding cattle with 
 ensilage. Condition of stock fed on ensilage. Increase of milk. 
 Quality and flavor of butter. Daily rations of cattle. Preparing of 
 ground for second crop. Building of more silos 31 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 FILLING THE SILO. 
 
 Kind of power required. Best machine for cutting fodder. Price of engine 
 and boiler; price of fodder-cutter. Best way for farmers who cut no 
 more than a hundred to two hundred tons, showing how to have fodder 
 cut and not invest money for power in full. Full description of filling 
 silos given. When fodder should be cut; most suitable lengths. The 
 great number of parties corresponded with, showing in every case a per- 
 fect success of the workings of silos and ensilage 36 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM J. J. H. GREGORY. 
 
 His opinion of ensilage. Kind of corn he recommends to plant for ensilage; 
 his reasons for it; best way of planting and working corn. Weight of 
 stalks that he has grown. Number of tons to the acre. Advantages 
 of this process given 38 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM GEORGE L. CLEMENCE. 
 
 Planting corn; time to plant; kind of corn. Winter rye for ensilage. 
 Product per acre of corn-fodder. Cost per acre. Machine used for 
 cutting; power used; length to cut. Construction of silo; material for 
 building silos. Description of filling silos. Cost per ton for ensilage 
 from seed to packing in silos. Mixture of rowen with, corn-fodder in 
 silo. Opening of silo, and condition of the contents. Feeding of 
 stock, and the results; quantity, and how often fed. Effect of ensilage 
 upon milk and butter. Quantity of ensilage to keep a cow six months. 
 
 Experiments in feeding stock. Appearance of cattle fed on ensilage. 
 
 Feeding of English hay and ensilage compared. Great advantages 
 
 by ensilage 39 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM B. AUSTIN AVERY. 
 
 Planting corn, kind to plant. Cost per acre. Average yield per acre. 
 Kind of cutter and power used: length to cut. Building of silo; size, 
 cost, and location. Cutting and packing in the silo. Cost per ton of 
 ensilage in silo. Important suggestions in filling silos. Opening of 
 silo. Quantity, and how fed. One hundred head of cattle fed on ensi- 
 lage; showing the effect on horses, calves, milch cows, etc. Fine appear- 
 ance of cattle fed on ensilage; increase of milk. Feeding of turkeys, 
 
12 H. P. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 ducks, chickens, on ensilage; their fine condition. Showing a gain of 
 three thousand dollars for six months by keeping his stock on ensilage, 
 over any previous year. Cost of labor in feeding with ensilage com- 
 
 Eared with hay. Success of feeding cattle entirely on ensilage without 
 ay or grain. Ensilage the year round 44 
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 
 THE ADVANTAGE OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS BY ENSILAGE OVER THE 
 SAME IN NATURAL OR GREEN STATE. 
 
 Cost of ensilaging two hundred and fifty tons, by Goffart; cost of same by 
 others. Value of ensilage as food. Comparative value of ensilage and 
 hay for feeding. Practical facts in regard to forage crops and ensilage. 
 
 Table of analysis, green fodder-corn and ensilage. Chemical changes; 
 advantages gained by this change. Its effect upon cows and sucking 
 calves. Mode of fattening cattle with ensilage; quantities and kind 
 given. Secret of the process, and the advantages 49 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM CAPT. G. MORTON. 
 
 Kind of corn, and quantity planted per acre. Kinds of phosphate used. 
 Average yield per acre. Cost per acre of raising corn-fodder. Machine 
 used for cutting, and length to cut. Construction of silo; best form and 
 material to build silos. Experience with filling silos; mixing grasses 
 with corn-fodder. Cost per ton of raising and packing in silos. Open- 
 ing of silo, and appearance of ensilage. Mode of feeding, and results. 
 Effect of ensilage on milk and butter; comparative price of butter sold, 
 produced from ensilage, and price of butter made from hay. Quantity 
 of ensilage for each cow per day. Condition of cattle fed on ensilage. 
 Value of ensilage compared with hay ; showing ensilage to be worth as 
 much as hay, ton for ton. Experience of packing corn-fodder whole in 
 trenches; success of same 54 
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 CLARK W. MILLS' S CORRESPONDENCE. 
 
 Number of acres, and kind of corn planted; method of planting. Time of 
 cutting; length to cut. Size of silo. Cost of raising and packing in 
 silo. Condition of ensilage when taken from silo. Comparative cost 
 of ensilage with hay. Appearance of cattle fed on ensilage. Effect 
 of ensilage on the milk. Six hundred tons of ensilage packed for 
 less than five hundred dollars; value of this compared with hay. 
 
 Showing great success of ensilage ; wintering a hundred and twenty 
 head of horned cattle and twelve horses without a pound of hay. 
 Opinions of some of the most distinguished and influential men in" the 
 State of New York given. A revolution in dairy-farming, stock-raising . 58 
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 DR. L. w. CURTIS' s CORRESPONDENCE. 
 
 Mode of preparing land for corn. Planting and raising corn-fodder; kind 
 of corn to plant; quantity per acre. Average yield per acre. Best 
 cutting-machine; length to cut. Construction of silo; cost of silo; best 
 material for building silo; most suitable location. Experience with cut- 
 ting and packing corn-fodder ; with grasses, Hungarian and rowen. 
 Opening of silo, and appearance of ensilage. Quantity of ensilage to 
 keep a cow six months. Condition of cattle fed on ensilage. In re- 
 gard to the success of ensilage. Valuable suggestions given ... GO 
 
CONTENTS. 13 
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM PROFESSOR J. M. M*BRYDE. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Interest in the subject of ensilage, showing his practical knowledge. 
 
 Kind of corn to plant; about imported seed. Location of silos. 
 Descriptions and experiments with silos and ensilage. Kinds of stock 
 fed, horses, mules, cattle, pigs, etc. Ensilage compared with hay. 
 Practical hints given. Experiments with ensilage, showing chemical 
 changes 64 
 
 CHAPTER XVI. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE OF F. E. LOUD. 
 
 Plan ting corn; kind of corn, and machine used for planting. Quantity of 
 corn-fodder raised per acre. Machine and kind of power used in cut- 
 ting; length to cut. Size of silo; construction of silo. Cutting and 
 packing in silos. Cost per ton to raise and pack in silo. Quantity 
 raised. Opening silo, and feeding ensilage to cattle. Cubic feet to a 
 ton. Experiments, and cost of feeding stock. Feeding grain with 
 ensilage; quantity of ensilage, and kind of grain given. Effect of en- 
 silage and hay upon milk and butter. Appearance of cattle fed on ensi- 
 lage. Cost of ensilage compared with hay. Comparative cost of feed- 
 ing ensilage and hay, showing great gain and advantage in favor of 
 ensilage 66 
 
 CHAPTER XVII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE OF WHITMAN AND BURRELL. 
 
 Number of acres planted, and quantity raised. More than one crop per 
 year on same land. Kind of cutter used. Length corn-fodder was cut. 
 
 Location, size, and capacity of silos. Material for building silo. 
 Filling the silo. Quantities and different kinds of grain with ensilage. 
 
 Cost of raising corn-fodder and filling the silo. Opening of silo. 
 Mode of feeding stock, and the results. Number of cattle that can be 
 kept the year round on fifteen acres of land. Comparative cost of 
 ensilage with hay, and number of tons of 'ensilage preserved, showing 
 a tremendous margin or gain in favor of ensilage. Great importance 
 
 of this system shown 67 
 
 CHAPTER XVIII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE OF J. P. GOODALE. 
 
 Planting and raising corn-fodder; kind of corn. Cost per acre. Average 
 quantity per acre. Cutting-machine and power used; length to cut 
 corn-fodder. Experience with silos. Most practical size and form of 
 silo; best material for building silos. Cutting and packing in silos. 
 Cost per ton of raising, and packing in silos. Opening of silo, and feed- 
 ing to stock. Quantity, and how often fed. Effect of ensilage upon 
 the milk and butter. Appearance of cattle fed on ensilage. Success 
 of ensilage; giving profit or gain in feeding twenty head of cattle with 
 ensilage compared with feeding same with hay, showing a very large 
 gain in favor of ensilage 75 
 
 CHAPTER XIX. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM BUCKLEY BROTHERS. 
 
 Length of corn cut. Size of silos; filling silos. Condition, color, and ap- 
 pearance of ensilage when taken from silos. How relished by cattle. 
 Cows, horses, sheep all eat it. Experiments in feeding. Great in- 
 crease of milk in quality and quantity 79 
 
14 //. .R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER XX. 
 
 PRACTICAL EXPERIMENTS WITH ENSILAGE, BY PROFESSOR M*BRYDE. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 First experiments; French experiments. Description of pit, or silo, dug in 
 the earth; neither bricked nor cemented. Full description of filling 
 and keeping ensilage in this pit. On opening this pit, and feeding cattle. 
 Description of silos built, and filling the same with corn-fodder and 
 clover. Cost of filling silos. Weight of ensilage per cubic foot. 
 Weight of cubic foot of clover ensilaged. Description of silo. No. 3, and 
 filling same with corn-fodder, clover, hay, straw, and German millet. 
 Results and experiments of ensilaging corn or grasses in the naked clay 
 or earth. Description of soils; reasons why it keeps better. Chemical 
 changes of ensilage while in silo 81 
 
 CHAPTER XXI. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM JAMES S. CHAFFEE. 
 
 Planting corn; kind, quantity, and cost per acre. Product per acre. Cut- 
 ting-machine used. Length to cut corn-fodder. Size of silo; most 
 suitable form and size, and best material to build silos. Cost per ton 
 of raising, and packing in silo. Condition of ensilage when taken from 
 silo; how cattle appeared when first fed. Experience in feeding stock; 
 how often fed. Quantity to keep a cow six months. General appear- 
 ance of cattle fed on ensilage. A test of milk tried, of cows fed on 
 ensilage and on hay. Superior importance of this subject over all others 
 in farming 86 
 
 CHAPTER XXII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM O. B. POTTER. 
 
 Number of years Mr. Potter has practised ensilage. Time to cut; length 
 to cut. Size of silos; description and diagram of sectional silos. Fill- 
 ing of silos. Cutting-machine and power used. Opening of silos and 
 condition of ensilage. Feeding ensilage and different grains and quan- 
 tities to all kinds of stock. increase of milk. Appearance of stock 
 fed on ensilage. Feeding ensilage compared with dry fodder. Supe- 
 rior food. Feeding of sheep on ensilage. Two crops per year on same 
 land. Success in preserving fodder. Mixing fodder in the pits. Ensi- 
 lage superior to soiling 89 
 
 CHAPTER XXIII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM JACOB PUGSLEY. 
 
 Variety of corn to plant. Cost of corn-fodder per acre. Average yield per 
 acre. Cutter used; length to cut. Size of silo; best form and size and 
 material for silo. Cutting and packing in silo. Cost per ton of filling 
 silo. Ensilage when taken from silo. Feeding, and the results; expo- 
 sure to the air. Quantity per cow per day. Gain in milk. Cattle fed 
 on ensilage. Feeding on ensilage the year round. Four essential points 
 for farmers to bear in mind. Advantages and profits of ensilage . . 94 
 
 CHAPTER XXIV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM F. S. PEER. 
 
 Corn-fodder; kind and quantity to plant. Kind of cutter and power used. 
 
 Length to cut. Size of silo; experience with silos. Cutting, and pack- 
 ing in silos. Number of tons put in silo per day. Opening of silo, and 
 condition of ensilage. Quantity fed, and how often. Effect of ensilage 
 on milk and butter. Feeding with ensilage compared with other fodder. 
 
 Feeding of all kinds of stock cows, cattle, sheep, calves, and colts 
 
 on ensilage. Total cost of ensilage 99 
 
CONTENTS. 15 
 
 CHAPTER XXV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM W. C. STRONG. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Experiments with Hungarian grass for ensilage. Packing Hungarian in silo 
 without cutting; result of the same. Another experiment of twelve 
 acres Hungarian. Experimenting ne\v grasses. Cutting and packing 
 same in silo. Cattle are wild to get tins fodder; cheapest food ever fed 
 out. Beneficial results of this process (ensilage). A new era in agri- 
 culture. Changes which no one can foretell 102 
 
 CHAPTER XXVI. 
 
 REPORT FROM HON. CHARLES WILLIAMS, NASHUA, N.H. 
 
 Description of silo. Filling of silo. Cutter used- Length to cut corn-fod- 
 der. Opening of silo. Feeding of cows, hogs, and poultry . . . 104 
 
 CHAPTER XXVII. 
 
 REPORT FROM DR. W. H. TANNER, AMENIA, DUTCHESS COUNTY, N.Y. 
 
 Building of silo. Number of acres and kind of corn planted. Opening of 
 silo. Feeding cattle. Success of ensilage. What farmers must do. 
 Feeding a hundred cows, with best results ... ... 105 
 
 CHAPTER XXVIII. 
 
 REPORT FROM GEN. STEPHEN THOMAS OF VERMONT. 
 
 Building of silo. Way it was built. Fodder-cutter and power used. 
 
 Comparative value of ensilage with hay. Cost of silo . . . .106 
 
 CHAPTER XXIX. 
 
 REPORT FROM HON. J. B. BODWELL, PINE GROVE FARM, HALLO- 
 WELL, MAINE. 
 
 Number of tons put in silo. Feeding to cattle and sheep. Manner of feed- 
 ing. Three important points in regard to ensilage. A good silo . . 107 
 
 CHAPTER XXX. 
 
 REPORT FROM MR. E. D. WORKS, FITCIIBURG, MASS. 
 
 Cutter used. Length and quantity cut. Filling the silo. Opening the 
 silo. Success of ensilage. Cost of ensilage. Other grasses for en- 
 silage 108 
 
 CHAPTER XXXI. 
 
 REPORT FROM COL. R. H. DULANEY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY, MD. 
 
 Number of acres prepared and planted for corn-fodder. Sjze of silo. Fill- 
 ing the silo. Opening of the silo. Eighty-two cattle, two hundred 
 ewes, feeding on ensilage. Great success iii feeding sheep, ewes with 
 lambs 10< 
 
 CHAPTER XXXII. 
 
 REPORT FROM MADAME RUDERSDORFF. 
 
 Has silo and ensilage. Ensilage compared w r ith English hay. Quality and 
 
 quantity of milk, fed on ensilage Ill 
 
16 T. It. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER XXXIII. 
 
 REPORT FROM E. M. WASHBURN OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Has silo and ensilage. Hay and ensilage compared. Ensilage as an invest- 
 ment. No reason why thousands of farmers may not make it as profit- 
 able as I have Ill 
 
 CHAPTER XXXIV. 
 
 FEEDING OF STOCK. 
 
 Different ways that farmers feed. A very economical way of feeding. 
 Different" ways of feeding with ensilage and grains. Most economical 
 way given. Best way to fatten cattle with ensilage and grains. Most 
 natural food with ensilage and grasses Ill 
 
 CHAPTER XXXY. 
 
 ENSILAGE FOR POULTRY. 
 
 How poultry relish ensilage. Appearance and results, fed on ensilage. 
 Experiments, feeding poultry on ensilage. Cost of feeding poultry. 
 Products of a hundred fowl per year, fed on ensilage. Products of one 
 acre of land of ensilage. Showing how a cow and two hundred fowl 
 can be kept from an acre of land on ensilage, by practical experiments . 112 
 
 CHAPTER XXXYI. 
 
 EXPERIMENTS IN FEEDING STOCK. 
 
 Very valuable and interesting experiments of feeding sixteen head of cattle 
 "for the month of January, 1881, giving the number of each animal, daily 
 rations of each, weight of each, first of month, weight of each, end of 
 month, gain per month, gain per day, gain per cent; every pound of hay, 
 ensilage, straw, corn-meal, rice-corn meal, cotton-seed meal, the quanti- 
 ties and weight of each being given; kind of cattle described: making a 
 very thorough and instructing experiment for a farmer .... 114 
 
 CHAPTER XXXVII. 
 
 Cuts and descriptive of forage plants: red clover, Hungarian grass, common 
 
 millet, lucerne 116 
 
 CHAPTER XXXVIII. 
 
 Cash premiums offered for the largest yield of fodder-corn per acre . . . 119 
 
 CHAPTER XXXIX. 
 CONCLUSION . 120 
 
H. R STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 WHAT MAKES THE FARMERS HAPPY? 
 
 THE reason is this, by reading this book and following the practical 
 experience of other farmers, who say to all the farmers of the United 
 States, The time has come, brother farmer, when you can earn two 
 dollars at half of the expense that you before earned one dollar, that 
 is, by preserving our green crops by ensilage, by turning our winters 
 into summers for the feeding of our stock ; by giving our cows, in 
 the cold winters, food and nutrition that is equal, if not superior, 
 to the green grass that grows in the warm sunny days of June ; and 
 the result is, in the winter months we have increased quantities of 
 milk, richer in quality, giving us butter of rich color and fine flavor, 
 equalled only by our June butter. And this preserved fodder makes 
 our cattle look better, they thrive better, the young stock will thrive 
 better, they grow faster ; in fact, they do better than when turned 
 into a good pasture in the month of June. And we can and do 
 obtain these great advantages at less cost, less trouble and incon- 
 venience. 
 
 The saving is so great, that we can keep four cows upon better food 
 at no more expense than we have kept one cow. There are other 
 advantages by preserving our green crops for ensilage. 
 
 We are not likely to lose a good part of our forage crop on account 
 of the weather. We can cut our green crops of maize, of rye, of 
 clover, of the grasses, and immediately, while filled with the rich 
 
 17 
 
18 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 juices, they are placed in silos: there is no waiting for a bright 
 sunny day, or a good " hay-day." They are preserved for ensilage : 
 they not only retain, but by the slight chemical change that takes 
 place there is an improvement over, the natural production. Our 
 stock say so when they eat it so greedily, their looks show it : that is 
 proof enough. There is no theory about it : the practical proof we 
 have. For one, I believe that is what the farmer wants ; and the day 
 is near at hand for the farmer, when he will say, not as he inquires 
 to-day, ''Who has built a silo for ensilage ?" but the question will 
 be, " Who has not got a silo for ensilage? " 
 
"SILO," " ENSILAGE," DEFINED. 19 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 "SILO," "ENSILAGE," DEFINED. 
 
 A SILO is a pit or well, vat or cistern, the sides and bottom being 
 made water- tight, with an open top. They can be made of stone, 
 brick, concrete, or wood. Some have been made by simply excavating 
 the earth, sides and bottom being cemented ; where the earth is com- 
 pact, it has been successfully used, without any thing being done to 
 the sides and bottom of this earth-pit, or silo. The walls are perpen- 
 dicular, made so smooth upon their inner sides as to offer no obstacle 
 to the settling or compacting of the ensilage by friction of the sides. 
 This silo is for the preservation of the green forage crops, corn, 
 Hungarian grass, clover, rye, oats, millet, and all the grasses. The 
 food thus preserved in silos, or pits, is called ensilage. 
 
 The origin of the word ' ' silo ' ' is undoubtedly French, the term 
 being compounded of the two words, " en " (in) and " silo " (a pit). 
 In adopting and developing the old process, known in different coun- 
 tries under various names, the French re-christened it by applying 
 the term "ensilage," both to the act or mode of preservation and 
 its product, using the term necessarily both as a verb and a noun. 
 
20 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 0". IMT. DV 
 PROFESSOR OF AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AJSD BOTAJSTT, 
 
 OF THE 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE. 
 
 A TREATISE ON THE ORIGIN OF THE PROCESS OF ENSILAGE. 
 
 THE farming community is becoming greatly excited on the subject 
 of ensilage. Every agricultural paper fairly bristles with notices, 
 references, or accounts of experiments ; and the process already 
 boasts of a tolerably copious literature of its own. There seems to 
 be, in this country at least, considerable misapprehension on this 
 point. Two entirely distinct processes are strangely confounded, - 
 "ensilage" and "ensilage of maize." A Frenchman, Goffart, is 
 generally regarded as the person to whom the agricultural world is 
 indebted, not only for the origination and development of the ensilage 
 of maize, but also for the discovery and development of the process 
 of ensilage itself. The gentleman himself seems to clearly distin- 
 guish between the two, advancing no claims to the discovery of ensi- 
 lage, while boasting in no measured terms of having developed and 
 perfected the ensilage of maize, speaking of it as a " monument to 
 his fame, more enduring than brass." 
 
 I have been greatly surprised at never having seen, in any of the 
 numerous articles upon this subject, some mention of the mode of 
 preserving grass for forage, as practised many years ago in East 
 Prussia. This process is fully described by Grieswald (1842) ; and 
 a translation of the passage is given in Stevens J s large work, "The 
 Farmer's Guide," which appeared in 1851, the year before Goffart 
 began his experiments. The process as therein detailed is so similar 
 
ORIGIN AND PROCESS OF ENSILAGE. 21 
 
 to that which Goffart has developed, even in the minutest particulars, 
 if we substitute fine grass for finely-cut corn, that I could hardly 
 describe the French method better than by giving, as I do, the 
 extract in full. 
 
 44 A curious mode of preserving grass for forage, instead of making; 
 it into hay, has been tried in Germany, in East Prussia; and it is 
 this : Pits are dug in the earth, ten feet or twelve feet square and as 
 many deep. They are puddled with clay, and lined with wood or 
 brick. Into these pits four or five hundred weight of grass, as it is 
 cut, are put in. a layer at a time, sprinkled with salt at the rate of 
 one pound to one hundred weight, and if the grass is dry. that is, 
 free of rain or dew, two or three quarts of water are sprinkled over 
 the layer. Each layer is trodden down by five or six men, and 
 rammed firm, especially round the edges, with wooden rammers, the 
 object of which is the exclusion of air. A little straw is then scat- 
 tered over the layer to mark its dimensions afterwards. Layer is 
 placed above layer till the pit is filled to the top, when the topmost 
 layer is well salted, and the pit covered with boards, or a well-fitted 
 lid. upon which is put a covering of earth of one and a half feet in 
 thickness. Such a pit will contain five layers of grass, and should be 
 filled in two days. The grass soon ferments, and in about six days 
 subsides to half its original bulk. The lid is examined every day, 
 and every crack in the earth filled up to exclude the air, which, if 
 allowed to enter, would promote the putrefactive fermentation in the 
 grass. When the first fermentation has ceased, the lid is taken off, 
 and fresh grass put in. trodden down, and salted as before. The pit 
 will now contain about ten tons of grass, equal to two or three tons 
 of hay. The pits should remain shut for six weeks before being 
 used, and then are used in succession. The grass thus treated has 
 the appearance of having been boiled, and its sharp acid taste is very 
 agreeable to cattle ; and twenty pounds a day with chopped straw 
 will keep a cow in good condition all winter, and twenty-eight pounds 
 will cause a cow to give a rich and well- tasted milk." 
 
 After reading this passage we are almost tempted to exclaim with 
 Solomon, " Truly there is nothing new under the sun." It reads as 
 if freshly taken from the pages of Goffart. Here we have modifica- 
 tions and improvements only arrived at by the Frenchman after years 
 of patient experimentation. The dimensions of the pit, the impor- 
 tance of the thorough exclusion of air, the puddling with clay (almost 
 similar to cementing) in order to effect this, the use of soft, fresh 
 
22 H. It. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 grass, the sprinkling with salt, the heavy packing down, the impor- 
 tance of succulent, un wilted grass, the board covering, the continuous 
 descending pressure of the weight of earth, which Goffart calls the 
 grand secret of the process and the most indispensable element of 
 success, discovered only after repeated experiments on his part, 
 the refilling of the pit after short intervals of time in order to econo- 
 mize space, the appearance of the preserved grass (ensilage), the 
 acid taste, are all points especially noticed in this old account, written 
 nearly half a century ago. 
 
 From all this we must conclude that the process, even in its most 
 essential features, is undoubtedly an old one, revived after lying dor- 
 mant and unnoticed for years. But, as the merit of the perfecter is but 
 slightly inferior to that of the inventor, great praise is certainly due 
 to those gentlemen who have by their labors in recent years brought 
 again into prominence a system which is so full of promise. In this 
 connection, the committee appointed by the Central Agricultural 
 Society of France to report upon the subject of ensilage of maize, 
 very properly observe, " The world is so old, necessity has so long 
 compelled the efforts of human beings, that we find precedents in 
 every line of improvement. But all experienced men who know the 
 great difference which separates a happy suggestion, or even a suc- 
 cessful attempt, from a practice well enough confirmed to become the 
 base of a regular business, will admit that these precedents do not 
 destroy the merit of any man who, like Monsieur A. Goffart, has 
 accomplished a continued success." 
 
 Whatever question, however, may arise as to the origin of the pro- 
 cess, there can be none as to the name. This is undoubtedly French ; 
 the term being compounded of the two words, "en" (in) and 
 " silo " (a pit). In adopting and developing the old process, known 
 in different countries under various names, the French re-christened 
 it by applying the term " ensilage," both to the act (or mode) of 
 preservation and its product, using the term necessarily both as a 
 verb and a noun. This name to American ears is pretentious, 
 unmeaning, and confusing. Our farmers would far more readily 
 understand English terms more descriptive of the process and its 
 product, terms similar to " canning" fruits or vegetables, " pre- 
 serving," " pickling," etc., and " canned " fruits, '* preserves," 
 " pickles," etc. They would all be more attracted by the terms, " to 
 pit corn," " pitting corn," " pitted corn," " to pit clover," " pitting 
 
LOCATION OF SILOH. 23 
 
 clover," " pitted clover," etc., or even, " to bury corn," " burying 
 corn," " buried corn," etc. 
 
 This system, then, is no longer an experiment : it is one approved 
 of by the experience of years, it may be of centuries ; and even its 
 more recent application to the preservation of Indian corn has been 
 thoroughly and successfully tried in France and elsewhere by hun- 
 dreds of enterprising farmers. 
 
 CHAPTEK IV. 
 
 LOCATION OF SILOS. 
 
 THE location of a silo should be as near the barn as possible, 
 for convenience and saving of labor in feeding stock. With many 
 farmers who have a barn basement, a silo can be built in the same, 
 and made quite convenient for feeding their stock. As many base- 
 ments of this kind are not over eight or nine feet high, it would be 
 practicable to excavate or dig to the required depth, if the surround- 
 ings will allow it ; or the silo could be built up through the barn floor, 
 say two, three or four feet, and, with an eight or nine feet basement, 
 would give a fair depth to a silo of this kind and size. 
 
 Some have made silos under the carriage-house which is connected 
 with their barn, and made very good ones. In locating a silo, the 
 top part of the silo should come near the level of the barn-floor, 
 or where the fodder-cutter will stand, so that it will drop right into 
 the silo. If your barn is situated on a side-hill slope, and your stock 
 are kept in the basement of the barn, by building your silo on the 
 upper side, and, when your fodder is cut, drops into the silo, your 
 door opening out of the silo into the basement, you have a very con- 
 venient location of silo for all work, and also a silo that will be of 
 the right degree of temperature for the preserving of ensilage ; as I 
 consider a silo under ground, or mostly under ground, better adapted 
 to the extreme high temperature and extreme low temperature of our 
 climate. In a soil that is naturally dry, a silo can be placed at the 
 required depth. In some locations where it is naturally wet, or 
 where, by going to the depth of five or six feet, you come to water, 
 it would be better, to get the required height, to build partly above 
 
24 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 the surface. With many who have basements under their barns, a 
 silo, or pit, could be made outside, close to the basement-wall, located 
 in a place where it would be most convenient to use in the basement, 
 or otherwise, by making a passage-way to the pit, or silo, through the 
 foundation walls of the barn. Any form or construction of silos, or 
 pits, which answers the location and condition may be used, such as 
 pits or wells, open only at the top, the food being put in and taken 
 out from the top only. Such silos, or pits, would have the advantage, 
 that successive croppings might be put in the same pit, or silo, one 
 above the other, each being sealed with a layer of earth when put 
 in. The deeper the silo, or pit, the more they will contain in propor- 
 tion to measurement, owing to the greater density of the contents 
 from the weight of the mass above ; and, the greater the pressure, 
 the more thorough the exclusion of the air, and, without any doubt, 
 the better preservation of the ensilage. 
 
THE BUILDING OF SILOS. 25 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 THE BUILDING OF SILOS OF DIFFERENT SIZES AND FORMS, GIVING 
 THE CAPACITY AND CONTENTS OF SAME. 
 
 SILOS can be built of stone, brick, concrete, wood, or earth. Some 
 have been made by simply excavating the earth, sides and bottom 
 being cemented ; where the earth is compact, it has been successfully 
 used, without any thing being done to the sides and bottom of this 
 earth-pit, or silo. Silos, or pits, are sometimes merely trenches, a few 
 feet in depth and width, into which the corn-fodder is closely packed, 
 and then carried vertically upwards above ground to the height of 
 four or five feet, and carefully covered by heaping dirt over the sides 
 and top to the thickness of eighteen to twenty-four inches. The 
 chief drawback to the use of such pits is their liability to cave in 
 when emptied of ensilage in the spring. One silo is described as a 
 well thirty feet deep, walled up and cemented, and furnished with a 
 windlass and rope for raising the ensilage to the surface. Many 
 build silos parallel to each other, with a common wall between, so 
 that they can be used in succession. Another form is described as 
 an elongated cylinder, arched over the top in the direction of its 
 greatest length, after the manner of a cistern, and with only a nar- 
 row opening left along the crest of this arch, through which the 
 corn-fodder is delivered ; and it is closed by a single covering of 
 earth after the pit is filled. 
 
 Another correspondent states here that he has experimented for a 
 number of years past with brewers' grain, endeavoring to discover 
 the best mode of keeping it. He has tried stone, brick, and ce- 
 mented vaults, barrels, and wooden vats, and found none to compare 
 with pits dug in a clay or other good soil. He is inclined to attrib- 
 ute the superiority of these to the preservative action of the soil 
 itself. 
 
 A very good silo is one built of concrete. It costs but little more 
 to build a good silo than it does a poor one. A well-built silo of 
 good material is the cheapest and safest. Professor E. W. Stewart 
 advocates to build it of water-lime concrete. First, having exca- 
 vated for the silo, dig a trench all around the bottom, and fill in with 
 
26 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 cobble-stones, and from one corner lead a drain, if possible, so as to 
 carry off all the water ; the trench under the proposed walls of silo 
 being filled with cobble-stones as per diagram. 
 
 Place standards of scantling long enough to extend twelve inches 
 higher than the top of the wall when it is finished. Place these 
 standards on each side of the proposed wall as per diagram annexed ; 
 
 L 
 
 11 
 
 oa. 3 x 4 inch scantling to hold ! inch plank while building wall. bb. Doors. 
 
 and if you desire the wall to be eighteen inches thick, then place the 
 standards twenty-two inches apart, and place a pair of standards 
 every five or six feet around the entire foundation. Be particular to 
 have these standards exactly plumb and exactly in line ; fasten the 
 
THE BUILDING OF SILOS. 27 
 
 bottom of standards firmly in the ground, or by nailing a strip of 
 wood across at the bottom of the standards, and a little below where 
 the floor of the silo will be ; fasten the tops of the standards by a, 
 heavy cross-piece securely nailed, and fasten the pairs of standards 
 in their plumb position by shores reaching the bank outside. Now 
 take plank an inch and a half or two inches thick and fourteen, inches 
 wide, and place them edgeways inside the standards twenty inches 
 apart, thus forming a box fourteen inches deep, and running all along 
 and around the entire foundation of the proposed wall. Fill this box 
 with alternate layers of cobble-stones, or any rough stones, and mor- 
 tar or concrete ; first a layer of concrete, mortar, and then a layer 
 of stones ; not allowing the stones to come quite out to the boxing- 
 plank, but having concrete over the edges, and the concrete must be 
 stamped or rammed down solid. Prepare the concrete as follows : 
 Take one part of good cement (Portland is the best probably), and 
 mix with this four parts of sand (do not have the sand too fine, 
 rather coarse), and mix the cement thoroughly with the sand while 
 dry, and then mix four parts of clear gravel ; make into a thin 
 mortar, and use at once. Put into the box an inch or two of this 
 mortar, and then bed in cobble-stones, then fill in with mortar, again 
 covering the stones, and again put in a layer of stone. When the 
 box is filled and the mortar " set," so that the wall is firm, then 
 raise the box one foot, leaving two inches lap of plank on wall below, 
 and go around again, raising the wall one foot each day, every second 
 day, according to amount of labor at hand. 
 
 If one-half the bulk of finely-stocked quick-lime is added to the 
 water-lime, it will improve it, and costs but little. If Rosendale or 
 Akron cement is used instead of Portland, then proportions should 
 be as follows : One barrel of good live cement, three barrels of good 
 sand, three barrels of good clean gravel. If no gravel is obtainable, 
 then use five barrels of sand to one of cement, and bed in all the 
 cobble-stones possible. Stones with rough edges are better than 
 smooth, as they bind the wall more thoroughly ; but any flat stones 
 found about fields will do as well. A layer of loose cobble-stones 
 should be placed against the outside of the wall before the earth is 
 brought against it, so as to have an air space, and a free passage for 
 water. We think that stone walls two feet thick, plastered with 
 Portland cement, are better than concrete ; and, where people can 
 afford to build of stone, they had better do so. As most farmers 
 have plenty of stone on their farms, they can haul and lay the stones 
 
28 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 themselves : if they hire the walls plastered with cement, it would 
 give them a good silo at a very low price. After the walls are fin- 
 ished, then level the bottom of the silo, giving a coating of coarse 
 gravel, then take the same mixture of cement, sand, and gravel, mix 
 it well in a mortar-bed, then add the water, mixing it well to the 
 consistency to spread well, evenly, two or three inches thick : smooth 
 it as you spread it, give it plenty of time to harden and dry. You 
 will have a solid bottom that will last for years, and no water will 
 ever get through it. Leave an opening in the upper part of wall, of 
 suitable size for a door, to take out ensilage to feed to your cows. 
 Have matched boards or plank to fill this opening : while filling your 
 silo let these boards bear on the inside of the wall ; as you place 
 them, have cement or mortar to bed them against the wall. The 
 ensilage bearing upon will keep them in place. By so doing, your 
 ensilage will be all right about the door. 
 
 If your silo is not under cover, you will want a roof over it. Have 
 it tight, to keep out all rain and snow ; any kind of a roof that will 
 shed water will answer. 
 
 A good silo will cost from seventy-five cents to $1.25 per ton. 
 Much depends upon the location and the convenience of getting ma- 
 terial to build the silo. Build a good silo, or none : it will pay to do 
 so, if you are obliged to borrow money to build. 
 
 Silos will have to be built many times to conform to the location ; 
 but, where the location and surroundings will admit, they should be 
 built rectangular in form, the annexed diagram giving the size and 
 form, which is twenty-five feet long, eleven feet wide, and fifteen feet 
 deep. This will hold one hundred and three tons, allowing forty 
 cubic feet to the ton ; which is the correct weight of a cubic foot 
 after the ensilage has settled in the silo. 
 
THE BUILDING OF SILOS. 
 
 29 
 
 This quantity will keep nine cows for one year, allowing sixty 
 pounds of ensilage per day, or eighteen cows six months, or during 
 the winter season. 
 
 A very convenient form of silo is one with two compartments : 
 one could be filled early in September with corn, second crops of 
 grass (rowen), and the other early in June, in our climate, with rye 
 or clover ; as will be understood by annexed diagram, which repre- 
 sents a horizontal section of two silos, or one silo with two compart- 
 ments ; each compartment being thirty feet long, ten feet wide, fifteen 
 feet deep with an eighteen-inch wall running through the centre, 
 
 making the width twenty-one feet and six inches. Both of these silos 
 when filled will hold two hundred and twenty-five tons, or one silo 
 will hold one hundred and twelve and a half tons. Both of these 
 compartments when filled would feed seventeen cows for one year, 
 or thirty-four for six months during the winter season ; or one com- 
 partment filled, holding one hundred and twelve and a half tons, would 
 feed out seventeen cows during the winter season. You will build 
 your silo to conform to the number of stock you wish to keep. If 
 you have ten cows, and you wish to increase to twenty, you had bet- 
 ter build your silo of suitable size to feed twenty. To get at the 
 exact size of silo to feed any number of cows you wish to keep, you 
 will multiply together the length, breadth, and depth of your intended 
 silo, which gives you the cubical contents of the silo. Multiply that 
 product by forty, as there are forty pounds of ensilage to a cubic 
 foot, which gives the number of pounds of ensilage in the silo when 
 filled. Divide this product by twenty-one thousand nine hundred 
 pounds, that being the quantity to keep one cow a year : this will give 
 you the number of cows it will feed. 
 
30 
 
 //. I?. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 Other forms of silo can be built with more compartments, if de- 
 sired. Messrs. Whitman and Burrell recommend, for one hundred 
 cows, a silo of suitable size to divide into three compartments, by 
 means of cross- walls, and then feed out one silo at a time : this 
 would provide an empty silo in the spring, which would be ready for 
 the winter rye, clover, June grass, which could be harvested early in 
 
 June, cut up same as corn-fodder, 
 and stored in silos for summer feed- 
 ing. Mr. O. B. Potter of New York 
 makes a series of silos, or pits, in sec- 
 tions as annexed diagram, which rep- 
 resents a horizontal section of pits 
 thus constructed, taken through the 
 doorways near the bottom of the pits. 
 Each one of these sections, or silos, 
 will hold seventy-five tons. The 
 twelve will hold nine hundred tons. 
 The entrance-pit will hold one hundred 
 and fifty tons. Each section is twen- 
 ty feet long, ten feet wide, and fifteen 
 feet deep. The entrance-pit is forty 
 feet in length, fifteen feet deep, and 
 ten feet wide. 
 
 STABLE. It will be seen, from this construc- 
 
 tion, that as many tiers of piers may 
 
 be made, end to end, at right angles to the first or entrance-pit, 
 as may be required and space allow ; and that, after the contents of 
 this first or entrance-pit are fed out, each of the other row of pits 
 may be opened and fed out, one pit at a time ; and that only the sur- 
 face of the food at the end of the one pit which is being fed will 
 at any time be exposed to the air until the whole are fed out. 
 
 ENTRANCE-PIT. 
 
EXPERIENCE AT ECHO DALE FARM. 31 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 MY PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE AT ECHO DALE FARM WITH ENSILAGE 
 
 AND SILOS. 
 
 AFTER reading Mr. Brown's translation of M. Goffart's publi- 
 cations, I resolved to have a silo of suitable size to fairly test the 
 preserving of green fodder corn for ensilage. As 1 read several 
 articles in different agricultural papers, I became deeply interested 
 upon the subject of ensilage. I visited, early in June last year, 
 Dr. Bailey's farm in Billerica. The doctor's farm is some four miles 
 from the station. Fortunately I met the doctor at the station, he 
 having arrived on the same train. The doctor's carriage was in wait- 
 ing : he invited me to ride with him to his farm. After a very pleas- 
 ant chat on the way upon the subject of silos, ensilage, etc., we 
 arrived at the farm. He was then ensilaging his rye, and mixing 
 through it the fresh-cut grass from the mowing-field : as the rye was 
 getting quite dry to be cut for ensilage, he had a continual stream of 
 water running through a hose with a rose-bib on the end of the hose, 
 and the water dropping upon the cut rye and grass as it dropped into 
 the silo. This water discharging into the silo answered two purposes : 
 it made the cut rye and grass more compact as it was spread and 
 tramped down, also it helped fill the air-cells of the dry stalk of the 
 rye ; by so doing it helped to exclude the air, which, with pressure, 
 in thoroughly excluding the air, is the success of preserving the 
 ensilage. In company with other visitors, Dr. Bailey showed us 
 over his farm : all seemed interested in his fine flock of Cotswold 
 sheep, his breed of Berkshires, which are the pure clean breed. 
 The short time there was passed very pleasantly, for all farmers 
 take pleasure in looking at good thoroughbred stock. 
 
 On the last of June, after waiting some two weeks, hoping it might 
 rain, I ploughed about two acres of greensward : and it seemed to me 
 I never saw the ground dryer ; it was like ashes. I prepared the 
 ground, planted my corn in drills (which was, by the way, corn I 
 purchased of Dr. Bailey, five dollars per bushel), rows four feet 
 apart, kernels three and four inches apart. Considering the ex- 
 cessive dry weather, the corn yielded very well. From what we 
 
82 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 weighed, I calculated we had twenty-five tons per acre. I fed a 
 part of this, cut up green, to my cows, the balance for my silo. I 
 planted a small piece on lower ground, where the yield was at the 
 rate of fifty tons to the acre. The stalks averaged twelve feet in 
 height. 
 
 I built my silo in the basement of my barn, sixteen feet long, 
 twelve feet wide, twelve feet deep. As it was an experiment with 
 me, I made the size of silo to conform to the location. The walls 
 were made of brick, one foot thick, well laid in cement, with door 
 placed near the top, six feet deep, three feet wide, facing in towards 
 the tie-up for the cows. I made, besides this, a smaller silo one-half 
 the capacity, to test the keeping of ensilage in small quantities ; but, 
 before I had the larger one entirely filled, I saw I should have but 
 little left to fill the small one. I would say to the farmer, the first 
 time you fill a silo you will wonder, and say, " I don't see where so 
 much of it is packed away," if your silo is large or small. I then 
 purchased a one-horse railway power, and a Baldwin fodder-cutter. 
 My barn is located on a south-east slope side-hill, giving me a twelve- 
 foot basement, entrance on south side, the main entrance to the first 
 floor, north-west side ; here I placed my horse-power and cutting- 
 machine, and made a good-sized trap-door through the floor. The 
 corn, when cut, dropped through the trap-door into the silo. 
 
 I shall mention in another part of this book in regard to power to 
 be used. 
 
 As a great number of persons wished me to let them know when 
 the silo was to be filled, I notified several of our Boston dailies, and 
 the following appeared: u Dr. H. R. Stevens, of Echo Dale Farm, 
 Dover, Mass., will be ensilaging corn every day this week ; and an 
 invitation is given to all persons interested wishing to witness the 
 operation. Trains leave Boston and Albany Depot, 8 A.M., 12.15 
 P.M. ; return, 1.30, 4.30 P.M. ;" and, from the great numbers who 
 came, I was surprised to see so much interest taken in this enter- 
 prise. For my railway horse-power, I built a platform of two-inch 
 plank, nailed strips of inch boards about four inches wide across the 
 plank, made the platform two feet wider at the bearing on the ground 
 than the top part. In doing so you make every thing safe in getting 
 in and out your horse. After you have once tried it, you will see the 
 importance of it. I used a horse that -had formerly been a very 
 valuable carriage-horse : although now sixteen years old, he has as 
 much life as any horse six years old. This horse-power was new 
 
EXPERIENCE AT ECHO DALE FARM. 33 
 
 business to me. With care, my horse went into tread-power without 
 any trouble. After one hour's work, you would think he was an old 
 hand at it. Every thing worked finely. 
 
 As I did not wish to use a steam-engine, on account of sparks of 
 fire from the boiler (for one, I am afraid of fire, around my barn, 
 especially in very dry weather) , I kept one man in the silo, treading 
 and distributing the cut fodder ; a part of the time two men, one 
 man to feed the cutter, one to cut up the fodder, one man to haul 
 the fodder from the field, the one cutting to help load. I used a 
 clump-cart with quite high side-boards. By using the last, it could 
 be tipped up by the side of the cutter, and save once handling. By 
 so doing, all were kept at work. I mention this : perhaps some might 
 think not important ; but I think it is, as many farmers of limited 
 means, or farmers who do not want or cannot have an engineer to 
 run an engine, will use the horse-power. The horse-power can be 
 put to many uses on a farm : you can saw wood enough in one day 
 for your house to last all winter, for it gladdens the farmer's wife to 
 see a large pile of wood drying nicely for winter use. 
 
 We continued cutting from four, to five hours per day for four 
 days. As visitors were coming every day, I was in no hurry. We 
 were filling the silo from two to three feet each day. I found every 
 morning, after the day's work, the cut corn- fodder would be quite 
 warm to the depth of one to two inches. Just before I commenced 
 to fill in the morning, I sprinkled four or five pails of water evenly 
 over the cut fodder : it cooled it, and arrested fermentation. When 
 the silo was filled, I spread evenly over the top oat-straw to the depth 
 of six to eight inches. I then placed two-inch plank crosswise of 
 the silo, leaving about half an inch play on each end of the plank, 
 to be free while settling with the corn-fodder. I placed on the top 
 of the plank good-sized stones, about one foot deep. 
 
 I found by trials, we could cut, with one-horse power, twenty-five 
 tons per day. Where there are large silos to be filled, say two hun- 
 hundred tons or more, steam-power with heavy cutter will do double 
 the work ; or a two-horse tread-power, with suitable cutter, will cut 
 forty to fifty tons per day. I think the fodder, when it is in bloom 
 or fully tasselled, is in the best condition to cut for ensilage. 
 
 I cut my corn-fodder in one-half inch pieces : some cut three- 
 eiq-litlis to four-tenths of an inch. The shorter it is cut, there is no 
 doubt of its packing closer ; the shorter the cut, the slower the work 
 in cutting. The process of filling a silo is very simple and easily 
 
34 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 practised : have plenty of pressure ; and, as the mass settles, it be- 
 comes air-tight, with the chemical change that takes place, forming 
 carbonic acid gas, which fills the interstices, thereby preventing the 
 oxygen from forwarding fermentation. I have no doubt the ensilage, 
 while in this condition, may be preserved for years. I opened my 
 silo early in December. I removed the stone and first plank near 
 the door, then removed the straw which was next to the ensilage. 
 The lower part of the straw, and about two inches on the top of the 
 ensilage, had partially decayed, and was unfit to feed to cattle. I 
 then sliced down the ensilage the width of the plank, removed it 
 from the silo. I found the preservation of the corn-fodder good ; 
 some parts had changed to a light brown color, mostly the leaves of 
 the stalk ; the pith of the stalks were as white as when first cut for 
 silo ; after exposure to the air for a few minutes, it brightened up, 
 the color was more of a light green, the odor and taste was alcoholic 
 and slightly vinous, from that taken off near the top. All below 
 this was very sweet, with the natural taste of the corn-fodder. The 
 ensilage was in a good state of preservation throughout the silo. 
 The slight chemical change that takes place in well-preserved ensi- 
 lage in the silo assimilates, or causes the ensilage to appear slightly 
 cooked or partly steamed. By this chemical change the ensilage, 
 when fed and eaten by cattle, is more easily digested. For that rea- 
 son, I say the ensilage is more beneficial to stock : they like it, thrive 
 better, and do better than when fed upon the same corn-fodder cut up 
 fresh from the field. 
 
 In feeding the ensilage to stock, they ate it very well, cows, year- 
 lings, and calves, except one Jersey, who, in a day or two, ate it 
 well. My cows have a good, warm, well-ventilated basement of my 
 barn, and I thought they looked as well as they could : they have the 
 best of care, well fed, well bedded, thoroughly carded and brushed 
 every day, and their hide and hair as clean and sleek as any horse, 
 and I did not expect they would look any better, if quite as well ; 
 but I must say I never saw them looking as well as they do at the 
 present time. They have less grain than when fed upon hay. They 
 are fat enough for the butcher, look sleek and bright, their hide is 
 loose ; and every farmer knows, with these indications it means the 
 best of health, with an increase of milk in quantity, and the quality 
 so much better, that the butter, with its rich golden color, is only 
 equalled in flavor by the June grasses. 
 
 bince I began to feed ensilage, I give no hay : each cow has its 
 
EXPERIENCE AT ECHO DALE FARM. 
 
 35 
 
 fifty to sixty pounds of ensilage per day, with six quarts of shorts ; 
 add to this, for milch cows, two quarts of corn-meal : this is for a 
 day's feeding, fed morning and night, at noon half a peck of beets 
 or carrots. Cows that are dry, and young cattle, no meal, turnips 
 iu place of beets or carrots. I had one Jersey cow that gave four 
 quarts of milk per day up to the time of calving. She brought forth 
 a fine healthy calf : the calf is now four weeks old, and has improved 
 as well as, if not better than, when the cow was fed upon hay. The 
 cow has been fed upon ensilage all the time, with six quarts of shorts 
 per day, gives a good flow of milk, and looks finely. 
 
 After taking off the corn- fodder for ensilage, I prepared the 
 ground, and sowed it to rye, with two acres additional. I shall cut 
 the rye while green, and in blossom, put it in silo to feed out during 
 late summer ; after the rye is cut, plant again to corn for ensilage, 
 to be put in silo early in September. I shall build, the coming sea- 
 son, a large silo divided in sections. Explanations given under head 
 of " Building Silos." 
 
 END VIEW OF SILO, SHOWING DOOR. 
 
36 IL R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 FILLING THE SILO. 
 
 WILL require either steam or horse power, also a powerful fodder- 
 cutter. A good portable engine, with boiler attached, that will d 
 all the work, and do it well, will cost from a hundred and fifty to two 
 hundred dollars. 
 
 A good fodder-cutter will cost forty to a hundred and twenty-five 
 dollars. 
 
 A good one-horse power, all ready to hitch to your fodder-cutter, 
 will cost a hundred dollars. With this you can cut twenty-five tons 
 per day, easy. 
 
 A good two-horse power will cost a hundred and sixty dollars. 
 
 This power would require a more powerful cutter, and would cut 
 fifty tons or more in a day. If the farmer thinks it would be expen- 
 sive to buy this power and cutter for the few days he would want it 
 in the fall and early summer, to fill his silo, and if he has a small silo 
 to start with, he could unite with others in his town or county, say 
 two ; it would divide the expense : four would make the first cost 
 less, six would make it very small. Or one man could own a good 
 two-horse power with a powerful cutter, or a steam-engine, and go 
 from farm to farm, and charge a good fair price. In this way it 
 would come very reasonable to the farmer. 
 
 If you are ready to fill the silo, it is important to have your corn- 
 fodder and grasses fresh-cut when taken to the silo. Do not cut any 
 more in the field than you can take care of at the fodder-cutter, more 
 particularly if it is a bright, sunny day. If my silo held one hundred 
 tons or less, I should cut it three-eighths or four-tenths of an inch. 
 I should never cut over a half-inch for any-size silo. You are per- 
 fectly safe in cutting these lengths. There is no doubt, the finer the 
 cut, the closer the pack ; and from the beginning to the end pack 
 your fodder close, tramp, tramp, with plenty of pressure. Tramp 
 well, close to the sides and the corners. When your silo is full, even 
 with the top of your walls, and you have more corn-fodder or grasses, 
 you can build a frame of plank, two or three feet high, and of the 
 same width and length of the silo. Place this upon the walls, and 
 fill the space to the top of the wooden feeder. Upon the ensilage 
 a cover of plank is placed : load with heavy weights, and in two 
 
FILLING THE SILO. 
 
 37 
 
 days the cover will have pressed the ensilage below the mouth of the 
 pit, on a level with the top of the wall. Then remove this covering, 
 and proceed to cover the ensilage as you would if you had not put in 
 this extra quantity ; spread as quickly as possible over the top of 
 your ensilage, rye, oat, or barley straw, to the depth of six or eight 
 inches ; then place on the top of straw the plank already cut to 
 lengths, crossways of your silo, close together, covering the whole 
 surface of the plank with stone or rocks, not less than one foot in 
 depth. If stones and rocks are scarce, place bricks, iron, boxes, or 
 bags of dirt, logs of wood, any thing that will weight down and com- 
 press the ensilage. By following these directions, you will always 
 have good success. 
 
 I have visited, or corresponded with, thirty-seven different parties, 
 within the past year, who have silos : all are enthusiastic on the good 
 reports of ensilage ; and the majority who have not large silos will 
 build one some two additional the coming year. 
 
 TAKING ENSILAGE FROM SILO BY VERTICAL SLICING, 
 
38 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 - J". J~. HI. O-K.EC3-OE.ir, 
 
 MARBLEHEAD, MASS., JAN. 15, 1881. 
 
 H. R. STEVENS, ESQ. 
 
 My Dear Sir: 
 
 I have had no personal experience with silos, but think exceed- 
 ingly well of ensilage. In answer to questions, would say : Would 
 recommend " Blunt 's Prolific," expressly; but any of the largest 
 varieties of Southern corn will answer, such as " Chester County 
 Mammoth" for example. Why I would prefer " Blunt's " is be- 
 cause, while it gives great stalk here North (sometimes seventeen 
 feet high), it ears more abundantly than other Southern kinds. The 
 best time to cut corn is when the ears are in the milk, while they are, 
 bulk for bulk, by far the most valuable portion of the crop. I advo- 
 cate the Southern in preference to Northern varieties ; because, though 
 the Northern sorts analyze a large per cent of sugar, yet their bulk 
 of leaves and stalks is more than proportionally smaller. When to 
 plant, for the large Southern varieties, I would recommend, for this 
 latitude, to plant by 10th of June. 
 
 I would advocate plenty of room, have the rows three to four feet 
 apart ; also to plant and work wholly by machinery, when the area is 
 large. We have grown stalks to weigh five pounds or more. 
 
 As regards the quantity per acre, I would say forty tons, though 
 at rate of seventy tons per acre have been raised in small area. 
 Ensilage meets the means of doing what we before considered im- 
 possible : saves corn- fodder on a large scale, and large variety of 
 fodder, in better condition than when dried. It will make food more 
 acceptable to cattle, and present it in a form advanced one stage 
 toward digestion ; and, though the nutritious qualities may be slightly 
 diminished, the fat-making qualities are more than proportionally 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF GEORGE L. CLEMENCE. 39 
 
 increased. It will also nearly carry summer into winter in the qual- 
 ity it gives to the food, which cows will show in the butter and milk. 
 There is another argument of great weight : it will, in effect, add 
 largely to the area of our barns, by making the cellar and below 
 ground available for fodder storage. 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 J. J. H. GREGORY. 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 . O-EOE^O-E L- 
 
 SOUTHBBIDGE, MASS., JAN. 22, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 Dear Sir : 
 
 In reply to your letter, asking my experience with ensilage, I would 
 say, that I first became interested in the preservation of our green 
 crops in silos during the winter of 1879 and 1880. In answering 
 your request, I will repeat the questions, and answer them practicably 
 as far as I have had experience. 
 
 QUES. What is your method of planting and raising corn-fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. I turn under greensward about the 1st of May, and apply 
 six to eight cords stable-manure per acre, which I spread and thor- 
 oughly mix with the soil, to the depth of four inches, by using a two- 
 horse cultivator. I plant with an Albany corn-planter, in drills three 
 feet apart, about the 20th of May. I run a cultivator between each 
 row, as the corn is two inches high, then again as often as the weeds 
 start, or the soil becomes compact. 
 
 QUES. What kind of corn do you think best to plant for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. Kentucky White, for the reason that it contains less sugar, 
 thereby producing less acid while undergoing fermentation in the 
 silo. 
 
40 R. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 Q UES . What time of the year do you think most suitable to plant 
 corn for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. About the 20th of May. 
 
 QUES. About what is the cost per acre of raising corn ready for 
 ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. I can raise corn-fodder for thirty dollars per acre. This 
 includes whole cost of labor, and one-half cost of manure, balance 
 remaining for successive grass-crops. 
 
 QUES. About how much corn-fodder for ensilage do you average 
 per acre? 
 
 ANS. I weighed a portion of my field last fall, and found I had 
 at rate of fifty tons per acre. 
 
 QUES. Do you plant or raise any grasses or grains for ensilage? 
 
 ANS. I sowed three acres of winter rye last fall, which I propose 
 to ensilage as soon as in bloom, and use it for soiling milch cows in 
 August and September. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider the best machine for cutting fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. The "Silver" and " Deming, No. 16," sold by Whitte- 
 more Brothers of Boston. 
 
 QUES. What length do you consider suitable to cut the corn- 
 fodder ? 
 
 ANS. I think three-eighths of an inch most suitable. 
 
 QUES. Will you give me your experience with silos? 
 
 ANS. I built an experimental silo in July, 1880, in the following 
 manner : I took out the floor in the end of my stable, for a space of 
 twelve feet each way ; I then excavated in the basement beneath, 
 which is nine feet deep, one foot, and placed four sticks of timber 
 on the bottom of this excavation, so that the inside face of the tim- 
 ber was plumb with the inside face of the sills of stable above. I 
 next procured twelve hundred feet one-inch pine boards, twelve feet 
 long, planed on one side and matched : these I placed perpendicular, 
 and nailed to the sills of stable and timbers below. After putting 
 on one thickness of boards around the silo, we carefully papered the 
 inside with tar- paper, and over this laid another thickness of boards, 
 and painted the joints with thick paint : on the bottom, or floor, we 
 laid a coat of cement, three-quarters of an inch thick. 
 
 My silo was then done : it was in the form of a cube, the sides of 
 which were twelve feet, and the whole expense, including material 
 and labor, was thirty dollars. I will here state, that you may under- 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF GEORGE L. CLEMENCE. 41 
 
 stand better the position of the silo, that my barn is one hundred 
 feet long, by forty wide : the stable, in which I keep at the present 
 time sixteen cows and eight heifers, is in the south side of the barn. 
 There is a drive-way, or barn-floor, twelve feet wide, running parallel 
 with the stable. In the north side of the barn, there are bays for 
 storing hay. The silo is in the west end of the stable, the top being 
 two feet above the level of the barn-floor. 
 
 QUES. Your experience with cutting and packing corn-fodder for 
 ensilage in the silos? 
 
 ANS. I placed the cutter (which, by the way, was home-made, 
 costing only six dollars) on the barn-floor, so that the corn, as fast 
 as cut, fell directly into the silo. The cutter was run by a one-horse 
 sweep-power placed in basement of the barn. We began ensilaging 
 corn Sept. 13, put in two feet per day for three days, when the corn 
 that I designed for ensilage was all in the silo. Sept. 16, mowed 
 two acres of rowen, which we put in the silo as fast as mowed, with- 
 out running it through the cutter : this filled the silo within three feet 
 of the top. I then put on six inches of dry hay, and put on plank 
 cover, on which we piled cobble-stones to the depth of two feet. 
 The whole mass settled two feet after putting on the stones : there 
 never was any steam, or smell of any kind, escaping from it. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider it costs per ton to raise the corn- 
 fodder from the seed, and have it thoroughly packed for ensilage in 
 the silo? 
 
 ANS. I can raise corn-fodder for sixty cents per ton, and the 
 expense of ensilaging is about fifty cents per ton ; making a total 
 expense of one dollar and ten cents per ton. 
 
 QUES. What do you think would be the most practical size and 
 form of silo? 
 
 ANS. I think a silo sixteen feet long, twelve feet wide, and 
 fifteen feet deep, the most practical. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider the best and cheapest material for 
 building silos? Some are built of brick, some of stone and cement, 
 some of concrete, and some have been built up of plank with quite 
 good success. 
 
 ANS. In sections where good building-stone are plenty, I think a 
 smooth stone wall, plastered on the inside with cement, would be the 
 cheapest. 
 
 QUES. Have you opened your silo to feed ensilage to stock? if 
 so, did it come out satisfactory? 
 
42 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 ANS. I opened the silo Dec. 4 ; found the hay that we placed on 
 top mouldy ; the rowen was a brownish color and very fragrant, 
 smelling quite like new-mown hay, but not just like it, more like the 
 smell of honeycomb. 
 
 The cattle all ate it greedily the first time it was given them, not 
 one of the twenty-four refusing it. 
 
 We got to the corn ensilage Dec. 24 ; found it had changed to a 
 light brown color, and had an agreeable smell, in which I could detect 
 a slight flavor or smell of alcohol. 
 
 QUES. Please give me your experience in feeding to stock, and 
 kind of stock. 
 
 ANS. Previous to the opening of the silo, I had fed my milch 
 cows two fodderings dry hay, one of the rowen, and one of dry corn- 
 fodder, per day, with one quart corn-meal and three quarts shorts per 
 cow. I then omitted the dry rowen and corn-fodder, and gave two 
 fodderings rowen ensilage ; and in three days the cows increased one- 
 eighth in their flow of milk. 
 
 For experiment, I kept an accurate weight of the milk from one 
 cow. For the week before opening the silo, she gave an average of 
 nineteen pounds and three-fourths per day ; for the week after open- 
 ing the silo, an average of twenty-one pounds and a half per day. 
 
 I then gave her rowen ensilage without any dry fodder, except the 
 meal and shorts, the same as she had during the season ; and she 
 gave an average of twenty-four pounds and a half per day, for the 
 week, showing a gain of four pounds and three-fourth per day, in 
 favor of ensilage. The cows ate during the week four hundred and 
 forty pounds, an average of sixty-three pounds per day. 
 
 Jan. 1 we put the cow that I previously experimented with on 
 corn ensilage, without any dry fodder except the meal and shorts. 
 She gave, for seven days, an average of twenty-five pounds per day : 
 she ate, during the week, an average of seventy pounds per day ensi- 
 lage. Corn ensilage weighs forty-eight pounds per cubic foot. 
 Rowen ensilage weighs thirty pounds per cubic foot. 
 
 QUES. What quantity, and how often, do you feed ensilage? 
 
 ANS. My supply of ensilage being small, I am unable to feed, 
 at the present time, as much as I should like ; but from careful ex- 
 periment I find my cows give the most milk, and appear the best 
 satisfied, when fed the following rations : at six o'clock in the morn- 
 ing, directly after milking, I give each cow thirty pounds corn 
 ensilage, with one quart cotton-seed meal ; at eight o'clock, four 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF GEORGE L. CLEMENCE. 43 
 
 I omuls dry hay to each cow ; at noon, fifteen pounds rowen ensilage ; 
 at half -past three, four pounds dry hay ; and at six, thirty pounds 
 corn ensilage, with one quart meal to each cow. 
 
 QUES. What is the effect of ensilage, compared with hay, upon 
 the milk and butter? 
 
 ANS. The milk looks and tastes like milk made in summer : the 
 butter is higher colored, and has an excellent flavor. 
 
 QUES. When you first began to feed your stock on ensilage, did 
 your cattle like it? Did they eat it as though they were hungry 
 for it? 
 
 ANS. The first time we fed it to the cattle, they all took readily 
 to it, except two ; and they did not refuse it more than five minutes. 
 The cattle now all refuse the best English hay or dry rowen when 
 there is any ensilage within their reach. The flow of milk has kept 
 up the same as when fed on rowen ensilage. 
 
 QUES. What quantity of ensilage do you consider will keep a 
 cow six months, or through the season for feeding? 
 
 ANS. I think a cow can be kept through the winter on seven 
 tons and a half corn ensilage, and four hundred pounds shorts ; 
 but think a cow would thrive the best, to feed her five tons and a half 
 of ensilage, fourteen hundred pounds hay, and five hundred pounds 
 corn-meal. 
 
 QUES. What is the general appearance of cattle fed upon ensi- 
 lage? 
 
 ANS. My cattle all look better, and appear more contented, than 
 when fed on dry fodder. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider the difference in the cost of labor, 
 by feeding and caring for the stock, by ensilage and the same by hay? 
 
 ANS. If the silo is convenient to the stable, there is no differ- 
 ence. 
 
 QUES. In regard to the success of ensilage, or preserving of our 
 green crops for fodder for our stock, in what way is it going to be 
 of great benefit, profit, or saving to our farmers ? 
 
 ANS. First, it will enable us to make milk and butter in winter as 
 well as summer. 
 
 Second, it will enable us to winter our stock at one-half the expense 
 of dry fodder. 
 
 Third, we can keep, on the same amount of cultivated land, a much 
 larger stock of cattle, which will increase our supply of manure, so 
 that our farms will increase in fertility and value. 
 
44 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 In conclusion, I will say that I am so thoroughly convinced that 
 ensilage will be of great value to me, that in the spring I shall build 
 three silos, sixteen feet long, twelve feet wide, fifteen feet deep. 
 Two of them I shall fill with corn-fodder, the third with clover and 
 rowen. ^ I remain yours respectfully, 
 
 GEO. L. CLEMENCE. 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 IB. -A-TJSTIItT _A."VIE:R/5r_ 
 
 SYRACUSE, N.Y., FEB. 5, 1881. 
 
 H. R. STEVENS, Boston, Mass. 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 Your letter of 29th ult. is received, and contents noted. I have 
 been very busy since the receipt of your letter, or I would have 
 answered your numerous inquiries earlier. I seize the opportunity 
 to-day to reply to your inquiries seriatim. 
 
 I consider the Mammoth Sweet Corn and horse-tooth corn the best 
 to plant for ensilage. 
 
 I plant with a drill, three feet apart. 
 
 I have considered the cost per acre of raising the corn ready to 
 cut for the silo, including the value or worth of the land, at seven 
 dollars per acre. 
 
 Without actual measurement of the land, which I considered was 
 eleven acres, it yielded twenty- two tons per acre. 
 
 This being my first experience with ensilage, I have not tried to 
 preserve any grasses, or other food than corn. This coming summer, 
 however, based on my present experience, I intend to construct an- 
 other and larger silo than my present 'one, and preserve a large quan- 
 tity of both orchard-grass and clover, as well as fill my present silo 
 again with corn. 
 
 I used one of Bradley & Co.'s reaping-machines for the purpose of 
 cutting the corn, and which did its work in an admirable manner. 
 They are manufactured at Syracuse, N.Y. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF B. AUSTIN AVERT. 45 
 
 I am fully satisfied that ensilage needs to be cut fine. I would say, 
 under no circumstances cut more than half an inch long. 
 
 I commenced cutting my corn about the 1st of September last, and 
 immediately conveyed the same to the silo, where, on a platform, I 
 had erected two Daniels cutting-machines, run by a small stationary 
 engine, and so arranged that the corn dropped into the silo as it left 
 the cutters, where I had men stationed to spread it evenly, and to 
 insure thorough packing. I introduced a pair of small mules to 
 tramp the same, keeping them constantly stirring, and close to the 
 sides and ends of the silo. I had men and boys to tramp where the 
 mules could not reach. 
 
 My silo is seventy feet long, twelve feet wide, and twelve feet 
 deep, containing, as per measurement, ten thousand and eighty cubic 
 feet, or two hundred and forty tons at forty-two feet per ton ; and the 
 actual cost (exclusive of constructing the silo) of the ensilage in 
 the silo is sixty cents per ton ; and with the benefit of last year's 
 experience, I feel confident I can reduce the expense of again filling 
 the silo, at least one-third, making the actual cost for the coming 
 year not to exceed forty cents per ton. 
 
 My silo is constructed on a level with the cow-stalls, in the base- 
 ment of the barn. I think it would be full as well, if in dry soil, 
 that the silo be eighteen or twenty feet deep. 
 
 I am not fully prepared to say that wood would not answer the 
 purpose in constructing a .silo ; but I am fully satisfied that stone of 
 concrete is the more available, with smooth sides to allow the weight 
 on the top of the silo to press evenly, and exclude all the air pos- 
 sible. I regard the short cutting, thorough tramping, and heavy 
 pressure on the top, the great essentials in preserving the food in 
 good condition to feed to advantage. 
 
 I opened my silo about the 1st of November last, and commenced 
 to feed about one hundred head of cattle out of same at once. Not 
 one of any kind of stock on the farm refused it ; and all, with the 
 exception of the pair of mules, ate it very greedily. (I think the 
 mules must have been disgusted with the part they were obliged to 
 play in tramping it. ) Previous to opening the silo, I had been feed- 
 ing my cows on good hay ; and, after three days feeding of ensilage, 
 they had each increased, on an average, a quart of milk per day. I 
 commenced feeding about forty pounds per day, and increased to 
 about sixty, and just about what they would eat clean without waste. 
 
 My mode of feeding the ensilage has been, to take out the same 
 
46 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 from the silo, and expose to the air from eight to ten hours before 
 feeding, a part of the time, and then feeding direct from the silo 
 while yet warm. I have found, by the experiment, that the cattle 
 enjoy it either way, and I think perhaps as well, if not better, when 
 given them directly from the silo, and with full as great advantage to 
 the stock. 
 
 My mode of feeding has been, in the morning, to give a feed of 
 corn cut and steamed, which was cut and left standing in the field at 
 same time the corn was cut for the silo. This the cattle will eat in 
 the morning very well. At noon I give each cow about sixty pounds 
 of ensilage, and in the evening I give a small quantity of hay from 
 the mow. 
 
 I feed ensilage without any thing else -mixed with it, and obtain 
 equally good results as when I fed hay and grain ; yet I believe 
 still better results might be obtained by feeding about three quarts of 
 oil or cotton-seed meal, or corn-meal and shorts : but whether enough 
 better results might be obtained in producing milk, to pay for the 
 expense, I doubt ; but for the laying-on of flesh, or fattening for the 
 stall, I am convinced it would pay well. 
 
 It certainly costs me one-half less labor to feed ensilage than 
 either hay or corn-stalks, as ordinarily cured. 
 
 The horses, calves, milch cows, turkeys, ducks, and chickens (all 
 except the mules, true to the very stubbornness of their nature, even 
 on ensilage) have eaten it from the very first, feed with avidity and 
 relish I have seldom witnessed. The turkeys and chickens, etc., have 
 not been fed an ounce of grain this winter, except such as they have 
 obtained from the silo, and a finer plumaged set of birds I never saw ; 
 and I have never succeeded in getting as fat turkeys as I now have, 
 even by the most skilful feeding. 
 
 The milch cows have eaten it with equally great if not even bettei 
 relish than the young cattle, and have kept up their full flow of milk 
 all the while. 
 
 I consider, from my present experience, that from five to five tons 
 and a half of ensilage, on an average, will keep a cow through six 
 months without grain, in good fair condition. 
 
 I have now fed my milch cows and young stock on ensilage since 
 the 1st of November last ; and I challenge, not only the county of 
 Onondaga, but the entire Empire State, to produce a practical work- 
 ing dairy of milch cows, with better forms and condition, brighter, 
 healthier eyes, softer skins, sleeker coats, and more extended udders, 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF B. AUSTIN AVERT. 41 
 
 than mine. Hence, I say, that ensilage properly preserved is a health- 
 ful food, and very digestible ; and every farmer knows that eows cannot 
 maintain a full and healthy flow of milk, good forms and general con- 
 dition, sleek coats, soft skins, and bright eyes, unless the food given 
 assimilates, which is necessary to produce the above qualities. 
 
 I do not keep any sheep on my farm, and therefore cannot state 
 the cost of keeping same. 
 
 I have never practised soiling cattle. 
 
 I know of no reason why cattle would not do well fed on ensilage 
 the year round, with a slight run at pasture occasionally for a 
 change ; although my experience, so far, is limited by my present 
 feeding of ensilage this winter. 
 
 I have farmed it now for over thirty years on my present farm ; 
 and, for over twenty years, I have never sold a ton of hay off the 
 farm, having always deemed it necessary to feed the same on the 
 farm to keep up the average flow of milk during the winter, and, in 
 addition, feed for six months of the year grain costing me never 
 less than a hundred dollars per month, and often as high as a hun- 
 dred and fifty dollars per month with this hay. This year I have 
 already drawn to market fifty tons of hay, which I have sold from 
 twelve to eighteen dollars per ton, according to quality and change in 
 market, and intend to sell fifty tons more before spring, or as soon as 
 I can market it ; and have, since the first day of November, fed the 
 ensilage without a pound of grain of any kind ; and my stock to-day 
 are certainly in as good, if not better, condition, as any winter in 
 twenty years, when I fed the grain and hay combined ; and the flow 
 of milk is fully up to the standard of any period under the old system 
 of feeding. 
 
 Now, in closing this letter, let me state what I consider justly due 
 to my friend, the Hon. Daniel Bookstaver, ex-mayor of Syracuse, 
 who first gave me encouragement to build a silo, and kindly gave me 
 the benefit of his extended reading, and a goodly portion of his time 
 in supervising the construction and filling of the silo ; and who was 
 the only man in the whole county of Onondaga who insisted upon it 
 that it would be a success ; and whose faith never wavered a particle, 
 when it seemed as if not only my neighbors, but all who came to see it, 
 would go away to publicly pity me that I was making such a fool of 
 myself. But Mr. Bookstaver always calmly replied to these wise 
 men, " Wait and see : they laugh longest who laugh last ; " "It has 
 succeeded in France, it will succeed here;" and bolstered me up 
 
48 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 always with his invincible courage and belief ; and his every prophecy 
 in relation to the silo has been fully verified, and I am reaping the 
 benefit in a golden harvest. 
 
 I am fully convinced from my success, and the number who now 
 come to see the silo, and watch the cattle as they are fed, and their 
 surprise and conviction against their previous prejudice, that there 
 will be, instead of my single silo in this county another year, at least 
 fifty next year, and in less than five years more than one thousand. 
 
 If the information I have so hurriedly given you will prove of any 
 benefit to my countrymen, I am only too glad to have been enabled to 
 give it to you. 
 
 Yours, etc., 
 
 B. AUSTIN AVERT. 
 
 It appears by the statement of Mr. Avery, the gain in feeding his 
 stock with ensilage, compared with former years, will be the sale of 
 a hundred tons of hay, which would average fifteen dollars per ton 
 (fifteen hundred dollars) ; also the saving of a hundred and twenty- 
 five dollars, the average per month of grain, six months (seven hun- 
 dred and fifty), making a total of $2,250 ; also the increased quantity 
 of milk, which was an average of one quart per day per cow, after 
 three days feeding, and also saves one-half the labor, in feeding with 
 ensilage ; and his cattle are in better condition than they have been 
 for twenty years. 
 
THE VALUE OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS. 49 
 
 CHAPTER XL 
 
 THE ADVANTAGES AND VALUE OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS BY EN- 
 SILAGE, OVER THE SAME IN THEIR NATURAL OR GREEN STATE. 
 
 BY IFIROIFIESSOiR, IMl'lBiR/XTDIEJ. 
 
 ENSILAGE gives the farmer the means of readily preserving such 
 crops in the cheapest and easiest manner. No other method can 
 compare with it on the score of economy. Goffart, in an itemized 
 statement, shows that the cost of gathering and "ensilaging" about 
 two hundred and fifty tons of Indian corn does not exceed twenty 
 cents per ton. His laborers, men and women, cost him from twenty 
 cents to thirty-seven and a half cents each by the day. Another 
 French agriculturist, M. de Beauquesnc, puts the cost at twenty 
 cents for the long ton, 2,250 pounds. Both these gentlemen use 
 steam-power. Another, who uses horse-power, estimates the cost at 
 sixty cents for the long ton. Dr. Bailey states that the cost of cutting 
 down the corn, hauling it to the cutter, cutting it up, and packing it 
 in the silo, was not far from seventy-five cents. The same work at 
 the University farm costs sixty-eight and three-fourths cents per ton. 
 We put up about seventeen tons : the labor was charged at seventy- 
 five cents per day for each hand. It should also be observed that the 
 cutting is properly no part of the cost : it should be done whether 
 the corn is green or dry, as a measure of economy, to avoid waste in 
 feeding, and to save the animal as much muscular exertion in the act 
 of eating as possible. It can be done cheaper, once for all, than 
 from day to day, as required by the usual practice of feeding. Third, 
 the value of the food so preserved is beyond all question. It comes 
 out of the silo green and succulent, and as fresh as when first put 
 in, the slight changes which it undergoes being all for the better. 
 After repeated trials, under various conditions, and with different 
 kinds of stock, many French farmers declare that three hundred 
 pounds, not a few that two hundred pounds, of this ensilage, are fully 
 equal to one hundred pounds of the very best hay. Goffart (and 
 
50 //. ft. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 after him Dr. Bailey) draws attention to the fact that a given weight 
 of grass, amply sufficient when green to fatten an animal, will hardly 
 suffice to keep him alive when it is cured up into even first-class hay ; 
 that grass fattens, while hay will not ; that grass gives rich milk and 
 golden butter, hay inferior milk and pale, insipid butter ; that the 
 odor of a new-mown meadow shows that the elements of nutrition are 
 escaping from the grass during the process of desiccation. 
 
 Such observations, however, are neither new nor original. More 
 than thirty years ago Bousingault observed of the value of green 
 food, " Breeders have long suspected that green fodder is more 
 nutritious than dry ; that grass, clover, etc., lose nutritious matter by 
 being made into hay." 
 
 That the thing is so, in fact, appears to have been demonstrated 
 by a skilful agriculturist, M. Perrault de Jotemps, who found that 
 nine pounds of green lucerne were quite equal in foddering sheep to 
 three and three-tenths pounds of the same forage made into hay ; 
 whilst he at the same time ascertained that nine pounds of greeii 
 lucerne would not, on an average, yield more than two and two- 
 hundredths pounds of hay. In allowing each sheep three and threev 
 tenths pounds of lucerne hay as its ration, consequently, it was as U 
 the animal had had fourteen and thirty- four hundredths, or more than 
 fourteen and one-fourth pounds of the green vegetable, for its allow^ 
 ance. These practical facts are obviously of great importance : thej 
 prove, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that the belief of agriculturist* 
 in general, as to the immense advantages of consuming clover anc\ 
 lucerne (and he might well add Indian corn), " as green meat, is well 
 founded." Green-corn forage is not a perfect or concentrated food, 
 si large amount being required to sustain life ; still, as experience 
 demonstrates, it is a very valuable one, and its cheapness allows of 
 its being fed in large quantities. Analysis, not always a safe guide, 
 supports the conclusions of practical men. In the following table the 
 first two analyses, of green corn and ensilage from the silo of Dr. 
 Bailey, are by Professor Goessman, of the Massachusetts Agricul- 
 tural College; the others, of French maize and ensilage, by M. 
 Grandeau, director of one of the leading experimental stations of 
 France : 
 
THE VALUE OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS. 
 
 51 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 pj Q, 
 
 N ^ 
 
 a 
 
 N 
 
 .^3 ^ Q C* 
 
 
 !i 
 
 I'S 
 
 o 
 
 P 
 
 s i^ ^ 
 
 
 
 S_o 
 
 M 
 
 ^'tt 
 
 ao ^ 
 
 
 11 i 
 
 R' ! P 2 
 
 sj 
 
 ||| 
 
 S> ? 
 
 
 
 
 i21 
 
 111 
 
 11 
 
 111 
 
 Is'i? 
 
 
 < 
 
 W 
 
 s 
 
 M 
 
 M 
 
 Water 
 
 85.04 
 
 80.70 
 
 86.20 
 
 81.28 
 
 60.71 
 
 Crude cellulose. 
 
 4.53 
 
 0.43 
 
 3.07 
 
 4.91 
 
 8.70 
 
 Fats .... 
 
 0.26 
 
 0.62 
 
 0.18 
 
 0.36 
 
 1.50 
 
 Ash 
 
 0.82 
 
 1.77 
 
 0.95 
 
 2.25 
 
 8.43 
 
 Non-nitrogenous matters 
 
 8.49 
 
 8.92 
 
 8.10 
 
 9.73 
 
 16.48 
 
 Nitrogenous matters 
 Acid 
 
 0.86 
 
 1.56 
 
 0.90 
 
 1.24 
 0.23 
 
 3.74 
 0.44 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It will be seen that the American samples of green corn and ensi- 
 lage compare very favorably with the European. European feeding- 
 stuffs generally show higher percentages of nutritive elements than 
 the American. The sample of American ensilage is richer than the 
 French in albuminoids. In both the value of the process is clearly 
 shown in the increased richness of the food. 
 
 It is contended by some, that the process of ensilage cannot change 
 the character of the material used, or make corn richer. But such a 
 change really occurs. All persons acquainted with chemistry know< 
 that, of two substances identically alike in composition, one may b<? 
 nutritious and the other not. Crude cellulose, like the lint of cotton, 
 cotton or woollen rags, saw-dust, paper, etc., are rather unpalatable, 
 as well as indigestible, articles of food for man ; and yet their treat- 
 ment with sulphuric acid converts then into glucose, or molasses, an 
 article in daily use on our tables. Such transformations take place 
 in the corn subjected to ensilage, according to Grandeau : parts of the 
 starch and celullose are transformed into sugar, and the albuminoids 
 are increased at the expense of the carbo-hydrates. The subsequent 
 fermentation on exposure to air imparts to the corn an acidity or 
 alcoholic taste very acceptable to animals. Any thing sour is not 
 only more relished, but, such is the part played by the imagination 
 in digestion, also more nutritious. Again, the softness of the food 
 saves the muscular exertion in mastication. 
 
 The French committee already referred to in their report dated 
 April, 1875, observe that the cows of Goffart had been fed exclu- 
 sively on ensilage during the winter. " We were struck by the healthy 
 appearance of the twenty-eight or thirty cows : their eyes were 
 
52 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 bright, their skin soft, and they were in good condition. But the 
 point that above all attracted our attention was the sucking calves, 
 which are the most delicate, and always the first to suffer from any 
 deficient or bad food given to their mothers. We did not see a single 
 one that had hair in bad condition, or that was scouring. The 
 fodder that produced this excellent result contained neither salt nor 
 oil-cake, and one would naturally inquire if it would be sufficient in 
 all cases. For very good milkers it would be necessary to add some 
 meal or oil-cake to the rations of maize which we saw distributed, 
 and which weighed about sixty-one pounds per day ; but for the cows 
 in the stable of M. Goffart, weighing alive eight hundred and eighty 
 pounds to eleven hundred pounds, this ration seemed to be sufficient 
 for them and their calves." 
 
 It is contended by no one that ensilage will fatten an animal : it 
 must be enriched by the addition of nitrogenous matters, or the 
 albuminoids, furnished by corn-meal, wheat-bran, ship-stuff, oil-cake, 
 etc. A successful Scotch farmer, Mr. Hunter, settled in Hanover 
 County, Virginia, fed twice daily to each of his twenty head of 
 fattening steers, two quarts of corn-meal, and a bushel basket of 
 ensilage (about twenty-seven pounds). The effects of this ration 
 were exceedingly marked and satisfactory : the animals making rapid 
 and large gains during the continuance of the experiment, which 
 lasted six weeks. It would seem, therefore, that from fifty-five to 
 sixty-five pounds of ensilage (corn) daily to the thousand pounds 
 of live weight will be abundantly sufficient to keep animals in good 
 store condition, and that forty-five to fifty pounds mixed with three 
 or four pounds of corn-meal will rapidly fatten them. Its effects 
 upon the flow of milk have been remarked on by all writers on the 
 subject. The general testimony of dairymen is, that no feeding- 
 stuff will compare with green Indian corn in increasing the yield of 
 milk : it is decidedly superior to roots. 
 
 Hence an abundant supply of such food in greatly improved con- 
 dition, during the winter months, is so great and so obvious as to 
 challenge the attention of every one. In this great department of 
 agriculture, dairying, it indeed promises a revolution. 
 
 Another advantage of no small importance to the farmer is, that 
 by this process he is rendered comparatively independent of the 
 weather. He knows, to his cost, the trouble and worry of hay- 
 making, how that his crop may be seriously damaged, perhaps 
 destroyed, by a single day's rain. In this process, he would almost 
 
THE VALUE OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS. 53 
 
 welcome rain, in moderate quantity, as much as in hay-making he 
 would dread it. The secret of the process lies in the thorough ex- 
 clusion of air from the vegetable mass in the pit, or silo. The tissues 
 of which all plants are composed are made up of minute closed cells, 
 or elongated tubes of very small calibre : these are hollow within, 
 and the cavities must be filled either with air or water. When the 
 plant is fresh and green, it is surcharged with moisture which pene- 
 trates its tissues, and fills these cavities : when wilted, the water 
 escapes by evaporation, and air takes its place. This air is retained 
 with great tenacity, and its expulsion is a matter of much difficulty. 
 Hence the importance of packing away the corn, or other green 
 matter, in as fresh and succulent a condition as possible, and the 
 advisability of sprinkling it w r ith water if wilted, in order to keep it 
 moist, and so prevent the entrance of air. 
 
 Again, in a dry spring the hay crop may fail ; but corn can be sown 
 at any time, in this latitude, between the middle of May and 10th of 
 July, and, if need be, in continued succession. Very rarely is the 
 whole season unpropitious : if the spring is too dry, the late summer 
 is more favorable : hence, with such a crop as corn, the chances are 
 greatly multiplied. 
 
54 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 OA.IFT_ GK 
 
 ESSEX, VT. ; FEB. 2, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 Dear Sir : 
 
 I am glad you are starting to do something towards giving farmers 
 reliable, practical information on the, to them, most important matter, 
 the preservation of green crops in silos for ensilage. I receive many 
 letters from the South, in fact, from all parts of Florida, Alabama, 
 Georgia, New York, Maine, and Vermont, all wanting the same 
 information you propose giving to them. I am an old sea-captain ; 
 was placed on the retired list a few years ago, after forty-five years 
 of seafaring life ; and all I know about farming had to be learned 
 from the agricultural papers. Two years ago I first read Mr. Mor- 
 ris's report, of Maryland, about silos : I concluded to dig one in the 
 ground. I dug a trench four feet wide, and about as deep, extending 
 it to hold what I had of sowed corn on a half-acre, packing it into 
 the trench without cutting, rounded up the top, put a length of boards 
 on lengthwise, put on a few stones, then ploughed and shovelled dirt 
 on to the pile, well rounded up to make it shed water ; opened in 
 winter, and found it preserved perfectly, except at the upper corners, 
 where it was badly frozen ; but the cows ate it all up clean. Last 
 year I saw Dr. Bailey's letter, also Mr. Potter's, on silos ; and, out 
 of the stone of an old wall about the barnyard, I built a silo sixty- 
 three feet long, twelve feet wide, nine feet high, with partition- wall 
 in the centre : wall laid up dry, and pointed with lime-mortar outside, 
 and banked up six feet all around, pointed and plastered with lime 
 inside, with cement floor. My reason for building it so long was that 
 I struck water after excavating four feet near the barn, and I feared 
 it would trouble me, so I lengthened it out into dryer ground ; but I 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF CAPT. G. MORTON. 55 
 
 am happy to say, the cement floor kept out the water, and I shall this 
 year build it to twelve feet high, and finish by a good lot of cement 
 on the inside walls. The cheap way of building a silo has demon- 
 strated that any farmer can build a stone wall with inside smooth, 
 bank up against it so as to keep the air from sides, put on plenty of 
 weight, at least half a ton to square yard, and he has a silo that wall 
 preserve fodder as well as a more expensive one for the first year or 
 two ; and he will then have a good foundation to build higher as he 
 wishes. Of course, the proper principle to build on is two alongside, 
 the central wall answering for both ; which I intend to do another 
 year. 
 
 My method for raising corn-fodder is to haul thirty tons of manure 
 to acre, and plough it under, four inches deep ; then thirty tons more, 
 and well harrowed in ; and plant as early as we do for corn, in this 
 climate, latter part of May to middle of June, with a planter, in drills 
 about two feet apart, and three kernels to the foot in the drill. I 
 should also say, and very important it is, to use phosphate. I used 
 Bradley 's in the drill, at the rate of three hundred and fifty pounds to 
 acre, to give it a start, and as much more sowed broadcast ; for I have 
 found out that I can raise as much from one acre well manured and 
 cultivated as from three half done. I use no other cultivation after 
 planting than the Thomas smoothing-harrow, and go over the ground 
 once a week, after planting and before coming up, without regard to 
 rows : harrow as if there was nothing planted until the corn is a foot 
 high. The whole cost by this method will not exceed five dollars per 
 acre, ready for cutting up. Average quantity per acre last year, thirty 
 tons. Half of it was not manured : the best part averaged seventy- 
 five tons to the acre, and taught me to make the ground rich. I used 
 with best results Blunt' s Prolific and Southern White, called the 
 " horse-tooth." It will take, as I planted, about five pecks to the acre, 
 put into silo what grew on two acres. The best machine, by all odds, 
 that I used, and I had three of them, is a Baldwin cutter. Mine is No. 
 14, costing sixty dollars, plenty large for a common farm. I cut into 
 one- fourth inch cuts ; and, when cooked in the silo, it comes out soft 
 and delicious. I have anticipated your question about my experience 
 with filling silos. The cost per ton did not exceed fifty cents from 
 the seed until thoroughly packed in silo. The best form to build is 
 undoubtedly deep and short ; but we must be governed by the circum- 
 stances and location. Stone, I think, is best and cheapest when they 
 can be had ; next, brick and cement. About here, where stone is 
 
56 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 plenty, whole cost of mine was about a hundred dollars. I would 
 not recommend plank ; for I find, where the plank comes in contact 
 with the ensilage, it is decomposed three inches. I opened my silo 
 6th of last November, and found the preservation perfect. All the 
 stock took hold of it at once as if they were hungry ; and horse, cows, 
 yearling calves, and shotes have eaten since with increased relish. 
 
 I saw to-day the calves picking the bits of ensilage up, instead of 
 meal fed with it. Not having enough ensilage to winter all my stock, 
 I have, since the first month, fed corn-meal and bran : mixed seventy 
 pounds per day to the twenty-seven head, thirteen cows, eight year- 
 lings, six calves, five shotes, and one horse. When fed alone I gave 
 forty to sixty pounds to cows, and in proportion to young cattle, one 
 bushel to the swine, with one-tenth corn-meal and bran, and increased 
 quantity of grain until I now feed to the whole stock, including horse, 
 two hundred and fifty pounds ensilage, a hundred and fifty pounds 
 corn meal and bran, a hundred and thirty pounds of hay cut fine, 
 same as I cut the ensilage, the whole mixed up in a mess for the 
 twenty-four hours, at night ; and all the cattle are in extra good 
 order. This has been remarked by the many, at least a hundred, 
 that have been to visit the silo this winter, I being pioneer in the new 
 departure in these parts. Before I forget it I wish to say that cutting 
 my hay fine has reduced the quantity of both it and ensilage one-half. 
 I learned this from reading an article in " The Country Gentleman," 
 where a farmer had cut hay for twenty-five years with same result ; 
 and the advanced thinkers amongst those who have been here con- 
 sider this cutting hay and straw, and mixing all together, a very im- 
 portant matter. 
 
 The long time that I have fed in this way satisfies me that it is an 
 excellent plan to feed ensilage. I am still milking seven of the cows, 
 and they give more than they did on the 6th of November, when I 
 commenced feeding ensilage ; milk and cream looks like it did in 
 June, as does the butter. I use the language of a leading farmer, a 
 few days since, when examining the butter : it goes to a grocer who 
 supplies the officers of the Boston Navy-yard. It netted us thirty- 
 three and one-third cents per pound, when other best winter butter 
 was selling for twenty-two to twenty-six. 
 
 I wish also to state that as soon as I commenced feeding ensilage 
 the cows doubled their milk. Please bear in mind that I had fed 
 green fodder night and morning, from middle of July, and after Sep- 
 tember two quarts of meal and bran, the pastures being dry. Of 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF CAPT. G. NORTON. 57 
 
 course nothing but the ensilage could have made this difference. My 
 wife, who has made butter on this, the old homestead, for forty years, 
 says she never saw cows give such a quantity of milk in winter. Last 
 winter I fed the same quantity of meal with hay, and the cows were 
 all dry before January ; and yet, with all these facts, I have neighbors 
 who will advocate feeding corn in the bundle, without husking, so 
 tenacious are some people of old customs. I told a man to-day, 
 44 Why, you might just as well have told me, when I was master at 
 sea, to heave shingles overboard, to find my way back with, instead 
 of using sextant and chronometer." 
 
 I take the ensilage out of silo any time of day, sometimes feed 
 immediately after taking out. I don't see any difference in its effects, 
 and cattle like it equally well either way. 
 
 One part of silo, when I had a heavy weight of stone, three- 
 fourths ton to square yard, it was very little acid ; and even what I 
 am now feeding has a pleasant smell and taste. I think ensilage is 
 worth as much, ton for ton, as hay fed with grain as I am now feed- 
 ing, better than either alone. I intend to put into our silo this spring, 
 or by the first of June, green rye, oats, and grass enough to fill it 
 for summer and fall feeding, and plant corn after. I shall then have 
 my first crop to put into the other silo in August, and also plant our 
 small corn after haying, to help fill in. I intend to build the other 
 silo, giving me three, and keep cows up nights, feeding twice in 
 summer. I am satisfied that other crops, with grass mixed with the 
 ensilage, will supply its deficiencies and stop the everlasting going 
 to mill ; from my experience this winter, I think forty pounds of 
 mixed ensilage (I mean put into silo green) per day, for average- 
 sized cows, will keep them fat the year round. I know I have some 
 small cows that do not need that quantity of ensilage alone, and they 
 are the best milkers in the stable. The cattle all like it better than the 
 best of June-cut hay : this I have proved many times, by seeing hay 
 left, but ensilage never. I will repeat that our cattle look better than 
 ever before, when fed on hay and grain ; and such experienced farmers 
 as Talcot and Whitney of Williston, and Taylor in charge of Col. 
 Cannon's stock farm of Burlington, said they had not seen any stock 
 looking better, and few as well, this winter. I give the credit entirely 
 to ensilage, for I had no more meal than usual. I learned long since 
 that we cannot expect something from nothing, and, by reading as well 
 as observation, that the farmers who are in the advance are those 
 who feed stock well. In conclusion, I would only say to farmers, 
 
58 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 Go on, and build your silos, and you will be as enthusiastic as those 
 who have already tried it. I am keeping three times the number of 
 cattle that was ever before kept on this, the old homestead ; and I 
 could have had one hundred tons more, without interfering with my 
 other farming, by simply planting five acres more of common corn 
 after haying. 
 
 Respectfully your obedient servant, 
 
 CAPT. G. MORTON, 
 
 Essex, Vt. 
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 REPORT FROM 
 
 :MI:R/. CL.A_:R,:EC 
 
 POMPTON, KJ. 
 FOB NEW YORK TRIBUNE, Feb. 12, 1881. 
 
 REVOLUTION IN DAIRY FARMING. 
 
 ENSILAGE used for food instead of hay. Successful experiments 
 near Pompton, N.J. 
 
 No proposed change in time-honored methods of agriculture has 
 excited so deep an interest among progressive farmers as the recent 
 experiments in preserving green forage crops in silos, or cement- 
 lined pits. One of the earliest adventurers in this new field was Mr. 
 Clark W. Mills, of Arrareek Farm, near Pompton, N.J. ; and his 
 silos are now as extensive as any in the county, and this success last 
 year was so encouraging that he is now wintering one hundred and 
 twenty head of horned cattle and twelve horses, without a pound of 
 hay ; and he is confident that he will bring his entire stock through 
 until May weather furnishes grazing. His store of ensilage (or 
 "cow-kraut," as facetious farmers style the preserved fodder) was 
 gathered from less than thirteen acres of land ; and it is simply the 
 stalks of Indian corn, cut when green into half -inch lengths, and 
 
REPORT OF CLARK W. MILLS. 59 
 
 packed in silos, under pressure so tightly as to exclude the air. Mr. 
 Mills estimates the entire cost of his supply of about six hundred 
 tons, including seed, tillage, gathering, cutting and packing ready for 
 feeding, at less than five hundred dollars ; and when it is remembered 
 that a sufficient amount of hay to answer the same purpose would 
 have cost something like seventy-five hundred dollars, the value of 
 the new process will be recognized. 
 
 Yesterday a number of gentlemen from various parts of New Jer- 
 sey visited Arrareek Farm to make a personal inspection of the 
 method of preparing the ensilage, and its results. In the party 
 were the Hon. James Bishop, chief of the State Bureau of Statis- 
 tics ; Professor George H. Cook, of the Agricultural College, and 
 State Geologist ; Theodore West, superintendent, and A. T. Neale, 
 chemist of the State Experimental Farm, besides several prominent 
 stock-raisers, like Messrs. Holly and Ahrens of Plainfield ; Nelson 
 of New Brunswick ; Ridgeway, Hutchinson, and Taylor of Burling- 
 ton County. In the barn, which is eighty feet long, there was not a 
 wisp of hay, but two pits, each forty feet long, thirteen feet wide, 
 and twenty feet deep, with strictly perpendicular walls of concrete. 
 One silo had been emptied ; and from the other a section of the cover 
 had been removed, and the ensilage cut out to the bottom, having a 
 perpendicular wall for inspection. 
 
 Mr. Mills has found, by experiment, that the freshly-cut maize can 
 be compressed in volume nearly one-half ; and therefore he places a 
 frame of plank fifteen feet high, and of the same width and length 
 of the silo, upon the concrete wall, and fills the space to the top of the 
 wocden feeder. Upon the mass a cover of plank is placed, loaded 
 with heavy weights ; and in a few days the cover will have pressed the 
 mass below the mouth of the pit, on a level with the floor when the 
 frame is removed. The cover is of two-inch plank, made in sections 
 of four feet in width ploughed and grooved, firmly battened, with the 
 battens of each section projecting, and fitting into those of the next 
 one, so that, under equally distributed weight, the whole moves down- 
 ward together. The sections are an inch shorter than the width of 
 the pit, leaving a space for air and gases to escape as the cover is 
 pressed downward. The weight used is about fifty tons of grain in 
 sacks, which is ground for feed as it is taken from each section. 
 
 The ensilage yesterday inspected was perfectly preserved, from the 
 top layer to the bottom. When cut from the solid mass it is of a 
 brownish-green color, and the juices have a slightly acid taste. It 
 
60 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 has gone through no " heating " process ; but, before feeding, it is laid 
 in a heap for a few days, to ferment slightly, when it emits a pleasant 
 vinous aroma. The cattle devour it eagerly ; and their appearance 
 seems to prove that it is healthful, while the abundant milk they 
 produce is of the best quality. 
 
 Mr. Mills feeds less grain than farmers ordinarily use in hay- fed 
 dairies. A tall variety of Southern corn is planted closely in drills ; 
 and it is cut after the tassel appears, and the ears begin to set. Pro- 
 fessor Cook, who has analyzed ensilage from a dozen localities, pro- 
 nounces the Pompton product of the first quality ; and he thinks the 
 various devices here used have reduced the system to a state ap- 
 proaching perfection. All the experts present were convinced that 
 the new process would work something like a revolution in dairy- 
 farming and stock-raising ; which will be readily believed when it is 
 remembered that more than thirty million tons of hay are now needed 
 every year to supply the horses and cattle of the country through our 
 long Northern winters. 
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 IDIR,. L. -W. OUIR/rXS- 
 
 GLOBE VILLAGE, MASS., JAN. 7, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 Your request has been received : but if I were not much interested 
 in silos, and believe they are to renovate the New-England farms, 
 I should hesitate to answer so many questions, as it taxes a tired brain 
 to write, while it is just fun to go to the barn and see the cows eat 
 ensilage ; but, believing they are to add millions to the farmers of 
 New England, I accept your invitation, and proceed to answer your 
 questions in detail. 
 
 QUES. What is your method of planting and raising corn-fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF DR. L. \V. CURTIS. 61 
 
 ANS. I have usually planted my fodder-corn between the rows of 
 early peas, cabbages, and potatoes, and, when those crops were taken 
 off, run a cultivator or horse-hoe between the rows once only. Never 
 put a hoe into a field of fodder-corn. Last summer we ploughed up 
 some where the grass had been taken off, put some manure in the 
 rows, and planted July 14 ; cultivated with horse-hoe once, and had 
 a good crop. Last fall, after I took off my fodder-corn, I sowed 
 winter rye, which I shall put in my silo, and then plant with fodder- 
 corn. I think farmers should aim for two crops a year. 
 
 QUES. What time of year do you think best to plant for ensilage? 
 
 ANS. Should sow fodder- corn from June 10 to July 4, or even 
 later. 
 
 QUES. About how much do you plant an acre? 
 
 ANS. I have usually planted one and a half bushels to the acre, 
 but think it will stand up better, and perhaps do as well, to plant only 
 one bushel of the Southern White, but more of any other kind. I 
 have planted thick, so the stalks would not be too large. 
 
 QUES. How much corn- fodder for ensilage do you think is an 
 average yield per acre ? 
 
 ANS. I think we can raise from thirty to fifty tons to the acre, 
 according to the condition of the ground. 
 
 QUES. Do you plant or raise any grains or grasses for ensilage? 
 
 ANS. I put in my field corn-fodder first, mostly mixed with corn- 
 fodder ; next came Hungarian, and finally rowen. 
 
 QUES. What do you think is the best machine for cutting corn- 
 fodder? 
 
 ANS. I do not think there is much difference between a Baldwin 
 or Lyons machine. I think either will do good work. My preference 
 would be for the ' ' Silver and Deming. ' ' I have come to the conclu- 
 sion it stands at the head. 
 
 QUES. What length do you consider most suitable to cut corn- 
 fodder? 
 
 ANS. Should cut it two-fifths of an inch long. 
 
 QUES. Will you give me your experience with silos? 
 
 ANS. My silo is built on the back side of my barn, the top being 
 on a level with the floor where my cows stand. To get fourteen feet, 
 I had to excavate about four feet. As I had no time to draw stones, 
 and had a sand and gravel bank within ten rods, I built my walls of 
 stone, gravel, sand, and cement, three parts cement, four parts 
 sand, and one gravel. In commencing I found I was using too line 
 
62 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 sand, and finally discarded the use of sand, and used gravel, size of 
 a pea down to very coarse sand. I also found that some barrels of 
 cement were not good ; which makes a great difference in the setting 
 of cement, gravel, etc. I shall build two more silos the coming sum- 
 mer. There are many farmers who have no gravel near, and have a 
 good place in their barn cellars. If so, they can make a good one 
 out of plank and matched boards, or two thicknesses of matched 
 boards, with tarred paper between. One of this kind can be put in 
 very cheap. There are hundreds of farmers who could raise up their 
 hay-floors, and make silos in their barn-cellars, like my friend Clem- 
 ence, whose fodder has kept just as well as mine. It would cost 
 them very little. 
 
 QUES. Your experience with cutting and packing corn-fodder for 
 ensilage in the silos? 
 
 ANS. I think a silo should be filled as rapidly as possible ; cer- 
 tainly not less than one foot a day. It should be spread evenly, 
 the stalks and leaves well mixed. It should be well trodden. I 
 should keep one man there all the time ; and, if I was filling fast, I 
 would put in two. I say tread, tread : you cannot do too much of it. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider would be the most practical size 
 and form of silo ? 
 
 ANS. My silo is twenty- four feet long, fourteen deep, and twelve 
 wide. I would not build a larger one, unless I run a partition through 
 the middle. I supposed it would hold from forty-five to fifty tons, 
 but I now think it holds more than seventy-five tons. No man who 
 never saw one filled would believe they would hold one-fourth as much 
 as they do. 
 
 QUES. About how much did your silo cost? 
 
 ANS. The help employed cost me sixty dollars ; cement, forty-five 
 dollars. I had the gravel and stone, and supplied the brain- work 
 myself. This is for the walls. The excavating cost but little, as a 
 large share was done with a scraper. I do not think my whole cost 
 of every thing, except brain-work and sand, was over a hundred and 
 twenty-five dollars, and believe if I had nothing else to do, with my 
 present experience, could put one up like it for a hundred dollars. I 
 should want plenty of time, so that I could select my days, and give 
 it time to set, at the bottom particularly. 
 
 QUES. What do you think is the best and cheapest material for 
 building silos ? 
 
 ANS. If the materials are handy, build a concrete wall, of stone, 
 gravel, coarse sand, and cement. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF DR. L. W. CURTIS. 63 
 
 QUES. Where and what do yon consider the best location ? 
 
 ANS. The location should always be convenient to the stable : a 
 side hill is far preferable. It should always be placed where the 
 ensilage could drop from the cutter into the silo. 
 
 QUES. Have you opened your silo to feed ensilage to stock? If 
 so, did it come out satisfactory? 
 
 ANS. The silo was opened Dec. 3. Although cold, the cows 
 increased in milk a quart a day, and some two quarts. I would add, 
 that the rowen that was the dryest had a very fragrant smell, while 
 that which was put in when very wet has a very agreeable smell ; but 
 the cattle eat it just as well, and it does not make the milk taste, 
 unless it lays in the stable while milking. I should not fear to put in 
 any kind of grass uncut, but should want heavy pressure, say a foot 
 and a half of stones. 
 
 QUES. When you first began to feed your stock with ensilage, 
 did your cattle like it ? Did they eat it as though they were hungry 
 for it? 
 
 ANS. My man said they acted like a hungry boy eating pie. 
 They will eat this in preference to hay. 
 
 QUES. Did your milch cows, when you first fed them with ensi- 
 lage, eat it as well as young cattle? 
 
 ANS. It makes no difference what kind of stock, cows or 
 young cattle. 
 
 QUES. What quantity of ensilage do you consider will keep a 
 cow six months, or through the season for feeding? 
 
 ANS. I should say, five or six tons of corn-fodder, but two less 
 of rowen or early-cut grass. 
 
 QUES. What is the general appearance of cattle fed upon ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. Cattle look healthy and sleek. My cows have roots, and 
 a full pint dish of cotton-seed meal. They seem more contented, 
 and look better than usual. 
 
 QUES. In regard to the success of ensilage, or the preserving 
 of our green crops for fodder for our stock, in what way is it going 
 to be of great benefit, profit, or saving, to our farmers ? 
 
 ANS. In the first place, he can soon double his stock, and, in the 
 second place, employ less help, making a double profit. 
 
 SUGGESTIONS. I would not let corn-fodder wilt. Should prefer 
 a dry day ; but should, after I began, work any day that was fitting 
 for man to work. If my field-corn fodder was a little dry, should 
 mix it with my fodder corn. Almost any land will grow winter rye : 
 
64 U. K. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 ensilage this, and put the manure on the fodder corn. Any ground 
 will raise a good crop of fodder-corn. The manure made from this, 
 put on the next crop of rye. It will increase that crop, and leave 
 the ground in a condition to grow a good crop of fodder-corn without 
 any more manure. A farmer can put in his first or second crop of 
 hay without any drying, thus saving a great deal of trouble. 
 Yours respectfully, 
 
 DR. L. W. CURTIS. 
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 IFIROIFIESSOIR, CT. IMI. 
 
 KNOXYILLE, TENN., JAN. 18, 1881 
 
 DEAR SIR: 
 
 Although much over-crowded with pressure of work, nvy interest 
 in the subject of ensilage prompts a hast}' reply to your questions. 
 M} T experimental report will give 3*011 all the practical experience I 
 possess. I shall attempt no theoretical discussion, but only supple- 
 ment the report by recent results of experiments. 
 
 You will see that I put up last summer and fall nearly seventy-five 
 tons. 
 
 Silo No. 3 (the most unpromising of the three built, because in 
 digging it it we found the upper layers of soil loose and crumbling, 
 consisting of made earth, and were only prevented from aban- 
 doning the work by the fact that the silo adjoined the basement of 
 the barn in which our cattle are stabled) was opened Dec. 27. It 
 was only three parts full, and the walls, in consequence of the long- 
 continued rains, had fallen in from the top ; yet we found the pres- 
 ervation of the ensilage absolutely perfect. I could desire no 
 greater success. 
 
 Fed to all kinds of stock. 
 
 Was eaten b}* all greedily, and with every appearance of relish, 
 horses, mules, cattle, pigs, all enjoyed it. I believe, if you have a 
 
ENSILAGE TREATED. 65 
 
 good, firm, dry, and compact clay subsoil, that a simple earthen pit 
 makes the very best silo. Science supports this conclusion, the result 
 of my experience, for the antiseptic and absorbent powers of soils are 
 now well known ; and the earth-walls permit the read}' escape of the 
 air forced out b}' the enormous pressure from above. The location 
 should be near the barn for convenience in feeding, on the upper side 
 of a hill-side barn, in order to be on a level with the basement in 
 which the cattle are stalled (such is the position of our No. 3). 
 
 I have only experimented with the large Southern field-corn : from 
 the liability of all varieties to mix, I confess 1 have in}' doubts as to 
 the superior merits of the much-lauded mammoth varieties. Seed 
 imported from Central America would be probably the best. I ex- 
 pect to have numerous experts this season, testing, not onl}* differ- 
 ent varieties of corn, but every other forage-plant grown. There 
 can be no question as to the superior feeding value of ensilaged 
 clover ; and I believe the several cuttings, afforded by certain forage- 
 plants during season, will equal amount of corn. Ensilage is, at 
 at least, fifty per cent cheaper than hay. 
 
 Finally I will give you a few practical hints. In taking ensilage 
 from pit, it is best to only uncover a very narrow section of end, 
 and to cut the slice, not more than a foot or so wide, down to bottom 
 from top. Remove this, and spread loosely and thinly on barn- 
 floor : it keeps perfectly for ten days and upwards, becoming slightly 
 more acid, and is more relished b}* stock, and the loss of w- eight by 
 evaporation is slight. The thin spreading prevents any rapid changes 
 and consequent loss. 
 
 Such management is more economical, as a large quantity can be 
 more cheaply moved at once ; and also by removing whole slices, it 
 prevents loss that will follow if only several layers are removed, and 
 some left without covering and weight ; for, in this case, the upper 
 remaining layers are spoiled by contact with the air for a few inches 
 down. We have had some thus loosely spread for three weeks, with- 
 out any deterioration or change, except the increased acidity men- 
 tioned above, being visible. 
 
 Finally, again, one writer contends, I see in a recent article, that 
 the acetic fermentation first takes place. A sample of ensilage taken 
 with great care from the interior of the pit, and excluded from the 
 air, and immediately placed under the field of the microscope, re- 
 vealed not only the characteristic fungi of the acetic fermentation, 
 but also those of the alcoholic. No doubt both processes occur sim- 
 ultaneously. 
 
66 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 Bacteria, etc. (living organisms), were also visible in considerable 
 quantities. The fungi and the organisms were exactly similar to 
 those found in the yeast, etc., examined at same time. 
 
 I will communicate later on the results of my numerous, and I can 
 say accurate experiments, as they are ascertained. I will be glad to 
 furnish you any further assistance desired. 
 
 Respectfully, 
 
 J. M. M'BRYDE. 
 
 CHAPTER XVI. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 . IF 1 . IE. LOTJID. 
 
 WEYMOUTH, MASS., JAN. 5, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS, 
 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 My attention was first attracted to the subject of ensilage by an 
 article in "The Country Gentleman," in November, 1879, which 
 referred to the subject in general terms, and alluded to the transla- 
 tion of the work of M. Goffart by J. B. Brown of New York. I 
 immediately set about getting the work, and read it with increased 
 interest. My experiments are made in all respects according to the 
 experience and suggestions of that writer ; who, by the way, I con- 
 sider to be the only reliable authority so far published. I take pleas- 
 ure in answering your inquiries, as far as my limited experience 
 allows, in as brief a manner as possible. 
 
 QUES. What is your method of planting and raising corn-fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. On May 20, 1879, I planted a hundred and fifty square 
 rods of land well adapted to growing corn, which had been in grass 
 for several years ; ploughed it in the fall, and, as soon as the frost 
 was out of the ground and it was dry enough, spread the manure, 
 eight cords to the acre, and harrowed it in thoroughly ; after that, 
 until the time of planting, run over it with a cultivator, to keep the 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF F. E. LOUD. 67 
 
 weeds clown, and to mix thoroughly the manure with the soil. The 
 corn was planted in drills, four feet apart, the kernels from five to 
 six inches apart in the drills. This was done with an Albany corn- 
 planter ; and, as often as the weeds began to show themselves, run 
 over it with a Thomas smoothing-harrow, until the corn was a foot 
 high : this kept them down, and the ground light. The season being 
 dry, I cultivated, once a week, till the corn covered the ground, 
 then used the hoe to keep the weeds out. 
 
 QUES. What kind of corn do you think best to plant for ensilage? 
 
 ANS. The variety planted was " Blunt 's Prolific ;" which grew 
 twelve feet high, on an average, when tasselled out. 
 
 QUES. What time of the year do you think most suitable to plant 
 corn for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. I would state, that it is practicable to grow two crops on 
 the same land, by sowing winter rye in the fall, after the corn is har- 
 vested ; which will be ready to cut by the 1st of June, in season to 
 plant corn for the fall. 
 
 QUES. About how much corn- fodder for ensilage do you average 
 per acre? 
 
 ANS. The product of the field was twenty-five tons. Several 
 different square rods of the crop being weighed, the average of the 
 field would make that amount. On 12th of August began to cut and 
 pack in silo. 
 
 QUES. What do you think is the best machine for cutting fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. The machine I used was the "Baldwin Hay Cutter, No. 
 15," driven by a portable steam-engine. All was cut and deposited 
 in fifteen hours' working time. There was some delay, as the 
 machine was new and untried. 
 
 QUES. What length do you consider most suitable to cut corn- 
 fodder ? 
 
 ANS. The corn was cut three-eighths of an inch long, and, as 
 fast as cut, well trodden down by two men constantly walking over it. 
 
 QUES. Will you give me your experience with silo? 
 
 ANS. A word about silos. They should be built one-half or 
 more underground, for the reason that the temperature is lower and 
 more even. 
 
 QUES. Your experience with cutting and packing corn-fodder for 
 ensilage in the silos? 
 
 ANS. As regards the storing of the corn, one man with a grass- 
 
68 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 hook will cut it down as fast as two teams will cart it to the silo ; one 
 man to feed the cutter, and one to tend the engine, and two to tread 
 it down. I think another year I can store the crop for seventy-five 
 cents per ton. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider it costs per ton to raise the corn- 
 fodder from the seed, and have it thoroughly packed for ensilage in 
 the silos? 
 
 ANS. The expense of cultivation, including one-half the cost of 
 manure taken up by the crop, was $2.08 per ton ; the cost of putting 
 into silo was one dollar per ton : making $3.08 per tori all packed in 
 silo. 
 
 QCES. What do you consider would be the most practical size and 
 form of silo? 
 
 ANS. The size will have to correspond with the number of cattle 
 to be fed, sa}' five hundred cubic feet to a full-grown animal for the 
 3'ear. The form, a parallelogram twice as long as it is wide. I 
 should prefer a silo with two compartments, each twenty- five feet 
 long, ten feet wide, and fifteen feet deep, to one twenty-five feet 
 long and twenty feet wide, for this reason : it will cost but a little 
 more to build a partition-wall ; and with this arrangement 3-011 can fill 
 one side with corn in the fall, and the other with lye, clover, or Hun- 
 garian, in the late spring. Such a silo, of the size named, will hold 
 enough to keep fifteen cows a year. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider the best and cheapest material for 
 building silos? Some are built of brick, some of stone and cement, 
 some of concrete, and some have been built up with plank with quite 
 good success. 
 
 ANS. The walls should be of diT stones faced with concrete. 
 
 QUES. Have you opened 3~our silo to feed ensilage to stock ? If 
 so, did it come out satisfactory? 
 
 ANS. Opened the silo Nov. 27, and found the experiment a per- 
 fect success. The top of the mass, about two inches thick, was a 
 little affected 1)3- fermentation ; which might have been prevented by 
 covering it deeper with rye-straw before weighting it down, say about 
 eight inches thick. After getting into it, the ensilage proved highly 
 satisfactory. In order that you may fully understand my way of esti- 
 mating the contents of my silo, and manner of feeding, I would say, 
 that, when fully pressed down, the twenty-five tons occupied nine 
 hundred and sixty cubic feet, or thirty-eight and a half cubic feet to 
 a ton, provided there was no loss of weight. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF F. E. LOUD. 69 
 
 QUES. Please give me your experience in feeding to stock, and 
 kind of stock. 
 
 ANS. In one month I fed to three cows, one of them in milk, 
 one hundred and twenty-four cubic feet of ensilage, which should 
 weigh something over three tons. By other experiments, I find that 
 I am feeding about sixty-six and two-thirds pounds per cow daily. 
 What the exact loss of weight is, I have not }*et determined. 
 
 Q UES . What time of the day do you take the ensilage from the 
 silo? 
 
 ANS. We go to the silo every afternoon. 
 
 QUES. How long do you let it stay exposed to the air before 
 feeding it to stock? 
 
 ANS. Take out sufficient for twenty-four hours. 
 
 QUES. What quantity, and how often, do 3*ou feed? 
 
 ANS. Feed night and morning. With this, I have given two 
 quarts of wheat-bran per cow, and have now commenced feeding the 
 same quantity of cotton-seed meal, with a little of the shorts per cow 
 daily. 
 
 QCES. What do you think is the comparative cost of ensilage of 
 corn or maize with hay ? 
 
 ANS. In comparing the cost of feeding ensilage and ha}', I find 
 it to be as follows : 
 
 COST OF ENSILAGE PER DAY. 
 
 66?j pounds of ensilage cost 10J cents. 
 
 3i pouiids of cotton-seed meal costs 4f 
 
 15 cents per day. 
 COST OF HAY PER DAY. 
 
 25 pounds English hay at $22 per ton costs . . 27$ cents. 
 3 pounds cotton-seed meal 4 cents. 
 
 32 cents per day. 
 Cost of ensilage 15 cents per day. 
 
 Difference 17{ cents per day. 
 
 The price of good English hay has averaged with ns twenty-two 
 dollars per ton for several }*ears in the market, and is now worth from 
 twenty-five to twenty-eight dollars per tori. By the above, it will be 
 seen that it costs double to feed with hay, while the difference of the 
 product of an acre cultivated to ensilage crop or hay is still more 
 striking. 
 
70 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 QUES. What is the effect of ensilage, compared with hay, upon 
 the milk and butter ? 
 
 ANS. The result has been an increase in the quantity of milk, 
 without any deterioration in the quality or flavor of the milk or butter 
 produced. 
 
 QUES. When you first began to feed your stock with ensilage, 
 did your cattle like it ? Did they eat it as though they were hungry 
 for it? 
 
 ANS. All kinds of stock eat it with relish and without waste. 
 
 QUES. - What quantity of ensilage do 3*011 consider will keep a 
 cow six months, or through the season for feeding? 
 
 ANS. This experiment proves that an acre of corn ensilage is 
 capable of keeping two cows a 3*ear ; while the average quant^y of 
 land required to keep a cow in the usual way is six acres of mowing 
 and pasturage, as by agricultural reports ; and, besides, it is not half 
 the labor to feed the stock in the barn. 
 
 QUES. What is the general appearance of cattle fed on ensilage? 
 
 ANS. The condition of my cows is much better than when fed on 
 hay, being in a thrifty state, and with the addition of cotton-seed or 
 oil-cake will take on fat readily. 
 
 Yours truty, 
 
 F. E. LOUD. 
 
 It appears by Mr. Loud's experiments in feeding, ensilage shows 
 a saving of fifty-four per cent, compared with the cost of ha}', with a 
 greater flow of milk, and other advantages, in favor of ensilage. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF WHITMAN $ BURRELL. 71 
 
 CHAPTER XVII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 IMIESSIR/S.. vsrHiiTiyn^.nsr & IBTJIR,- 
 
 DEAR SIR: 
 
 Your favor at hand. We send you by this mail, report containing 
 description of our silo. Hope this will be satisfactory. We will 
 gladly furnish any further information that we can. 
 
 Our silo is on the hill-side next to the barn. The bottom of the 
 silo is on a level with the cow-stable floor, and there are entrances 
 into silo from both the cow-stable and the floor above. The top of 
 the silo is on a level with the upper or main floor of the barn, so that 
 the fodder can be taken out on to either of the three floors of the 
 barn. You will appreciate the convenience of this arrangement. 
 The silo is built of stone ; the walls are three feet thick next to the 
 bank, and two feet thick next to the barn ; the roof of barn extends 
 over silo. All around the walls twelve inches of cobble-stone are 
 filled in from top to bottom, so as to prevent any water lodging 
 against the walls. Capacity of entire silo, about four hundred tons, 
 or two hundred tons for each compartment. On June 1st we put 
 in about seven acres of corn, with a drill, rows twenty-one inches 
 apart, and dropping six or eight kernels to a foot ; in September we 
 cut same, hauled to the silo as fast as we cut in the field ; and with 
 a feed- cutter of largest size, or next to largest size, we cut at the 
 rate of over one hundred loads per day, into pieces three-sixteenths 
 to one-fourth of an inch in length, which was evenly distributed in the 
 silos, and trodden down. The corn was large, stalks twelve to four- 
 teen feet high, single ones weighing five to five pounds and a half, 
 with ears on full of milk. Into one silo we put sixteen feet, and 
 into the other eleven feet ; as soon as filled (one taking three days, 
 and the other four) we put on the covers. These are of plank, three 
 feet wide, sixteen feet long, and two inches thick, fitting together 
 
72 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 closely ; and upon these covers we put fifty tons of stone to each 
 silo (stone picked up on the farm). Within a week one had settled 
 to twelve feet and a half, and the other to eight feet and a half. On 
 the 2Gth of October we opened the silo having the eight feet and a 
 half of ensilage, and found the fodder as green and sweet as when 
 first put in ; we used no straw under the covers, and yet right next 
 to the boards the corn was all right. We have fed the stock since 
 Oct. 2G ; and they are all right, looking and feeling well. One 
 cubic foot of ensilage weighs forty-seven pounds : we are feeding 
 sixty-five pounds to each cow per day, with four pounds of middlings 
 and a half pound oil-meal (cotton-seed meal). We had, before we 
 began feeding the ensilage out to the stock, two hundred and twelve 
 tons ; and the exact cost of harvesting it, filling the silos, putting on 
 stone, etc., was two hundred and seventeen dollars, allowing full 
 wages for our own time, etc. We are now going to feed fifty to 
 fifty-five pounds to each cow per day, and increase the grain to about 
 six or seven pounds for the cows still giving milk, and half as much 
 to the dry ones. This two hundred and twelve tons from seven acres, 
 or a little over, is a large result, and is equal to seventy-odd tons of 
 hay, "costing but three dollars per ton, or ten tons to the acre. We 
 believe that by putting all the manure back on the seven acres of 
 land, that we can get up to forty, and possibly fifty, tons to the acre. 
 We see no reason now why the cows that are being fed on ensilage 
 will not continue to do well in condition and product ; and our plan 
 now is to raise about fifteen acres of corn next season (1881), and 
 this will be sufficient to fill the silo full, giving us four hundred tons, 
 and this will keep forty cows three hundred and sixty-five da} r s ; but 
 as we shall pasture all of the side-hill during the summer season 
 (about twenty acres), the pasture will also grow better, because the 
 cows drop more upon it than they take from it. We think we can 
 give the cows all they will eat, morning and night, of the ensilage, 
 and keep in this way fifty head, the year round, on fifteen acres of 
 corn, and twenty acres of hill-side pasturage. We, however, imme- 
 diately after taking off the corn early in September, ploughed up the 
 stubble, and put in winter rye. This came up finely, and we will top- 
 dress it this winter, and early in the spring give it a good bushiug-in. 
 We expect to cut the rye by June 1 or 5, and cut that up the 
 same as we do the corn, and store it in one of the silos, then imme- 
 diately plough the same seven acres, and put in corn ; whether this 
 will work, remains to be seen. But we have full confidence in the 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF WHITMAN BURRELL. 73 
 
 perpetual fertility of this corn-land, because it is to be replenished, 
 not only with what grew upon it, but from the grain fed with the 
 ensilage ; for, by the pidii we have adopted, the liquid manure is as 
 perfectly saved as the solid, and the most accurate experiments show 
 that the fertilizing matter of the liquid is greater than in the solid 
 manure. Professor Stewart reports that he has found the manure 
 from one cow standing upon the self-cleaning platform, carried fresh 
 to the lield, the liquid all absorbed by the soil, equal to the manure 
 from three cows saved in the old way, by throwing into a pile and car- 
 ried to the field months afterwards. In fact, there is no fertilizing 
 matter wasted or lost, except that carried off in the milk. 
 
 The beauty of this system is, that, instead of spreading the manure 
 from forty or fifty cows over two hundred acres, we use it all on the 
 fifteen acres that furnish the fodder ; and shortly the laud must 
 become very rich, and then we can use the manure on other land. Jf 
 we were to build a silo on level land, we would excavate ten or twelve 
 feet below the surface, and then let the walls of silo run up ten 
 feet, using the earth that was excavated to make a bank about the 
 walls above ground ; we would locate the silo close to the barn, 
 making the top of silo on a level with the barn-floor, over the cows ; 
 then, in feeding out of the silo, the fodder could be easily raised with 
 any of the same appliances used for raising and carrying hay ; and, 
 with a track running to the shutes, the car could be dumped so that 
 the fodder would be deposited in front of the stock. The walls of 
 the silo should be perfectly plumb and parallel, so that the followers, 
 although fitting closely, can settle without binding when loaded with 
 stone. As you build the silo walls, point up as you proceed, both 
 inside and outside, and then plaster the entire inside (bottom as well 
 as sides) with Portland cement, as it is necessary that the silo should 
 be water-tight like a cistern. 
 
 In regard to size of silo, we would make them twenty feet deep, 
 and put them as much below ground as possible, if good drainage 
 can be had, banking up around the outside with the earth that is 
 excavated, as before stated. A silo thirty feet by sixteen feet, and 
 twenty feet deep, will be large enough to contain two hundred tons of 
 pressed ensilage ; and this would keep thirty-five cows six months, 
 feeding about sixty pounds per day. For one hundred cows, we 
 would advise building a silo one hundred feet long, dividing it into 
 three compartments by means of two cross walls, and then feed out 
 one at a time. This would provide ail empty silo in the spring, which 
 
74 tf. n. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 would be ready for the winter rye, clover, June grass, etc. (Hunga- 
 rian can't be grown early) ; which could be harvested early in June, 
 cut up same as corn-fodder, and stored in the silos for summer feed- 
 ing. Our ideas are, that it is best to give the stock a good feed from 
 the silos every morning and night during the summer, in addition to 
 pasturage. Now, as to whether people can afford to put in silos, 
 etc., we can only say that on our upland farm we had, at the begin- 
 ning of winter, two hundred tons of hay. If we had put in fifteen oi 
 twenty acres of corn, and cut and stored it in the silos, we would 
 now have been able to have spared all of the two hundred tons of 
 hay; and, as the price is now extreme (twenty dollars per ton), we 
 would have received for it enough to have paid all expenses of build- 
 ing both barn and silo, besides raising and harvesting the corn-fodder, 
 and we should have had fully as much manure to put back on the 
 farm as we will have now by feeding the hay. The stock would be 
 kept as well upon the ensilage as upon hay, and yield as much 
 manure ; and the hay that could be sold at eight to ten dollars per 
 ton would pay all expenses the first year. The right kind of corn for 
 seed costs eighty-five cents to one dollar per bushel ; and we hope to 
 get a feed-cutter capable of cutting ten to twelve tons per hour, or 
 a hundred tons per day, for about a hundred and fifty dollars, and 
 not require over a two-horse tread-power to run it. Corn-ensilage is 
 probably not a perfect food for cows in milk. Linseed meal, or 
 cotton-seed meal, with bran or oatmeal, will produce a good flow of 
 milk. Fifty-five or sixty pounds of ensilage-food, with three pounds 
 of linseed-meal and four pounds of bran, will answer satisfactorily. 
 We submit all this for what it is worth. Every one had better inves- 
 tigate thoroughly for himself. 
 
 Yours most truly, 
 
 WHITMAN & BURRELL. 
 
 It seems that Whitman & Burrell planted seven acres, on which 
 they raised two hundred and twelve tons, allowing the cost to be two 
 dollars per ton : they say, if they had planted fifteen acres of corn, 
 and put it into silo for ensilage, they would have been able to have 
 spared and sold the two hundred tons of hay. Allowing these fifteen 
 acres to produce four hundred and twenty- four tons green corn- 
 fodder, costing two dollars per ton, eight hundred and forty-eight 
 dollars, and allowing they sold the two hundred tons of hay at twenty 
 dollars per ton, which would be four thousand dollars, deducting the 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF J. P. GOODALE. 75 
 
 cost of four hundred and twenty-four tons of ensilage (which is more 
 than equal to the two hundred tons of hay) , it leaves a very hand- 
 some margin, or gain of $3,152 in favor of ensilage. Can any 
 Western farmer show such margins of profit for same amount of 
 money invested? 
 
 CHAPTER XVIII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 IMIIR,. CT. IP. 
 
 WEST PEABODY, MASS., JAN. 10, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS, Boston. 
 My Dear Sir : 
 
 In reply to your letter of Dec. 31, I will write a few lines, as far 
 as I have had experience, to answer your numerous inquiries. 
 
 QUES. What is your method of planting and raising corn-fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. I have raised corn- fodder for several years by planting in 
 drills. 
 
 QUES. What kind of corn do you think best to plant for ensi- 
 lage? 
 
 ANS. The kind of corn I think best to plant is what some call 
 the large ensilage corn. It grows more fodder to the acre than any 
 other corn that I know of. 
 
 QUES. Will you please give me your method of labor in raising 
 corn- fodder for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. My method last year was to plough the ground, and harrow 
 it, furrow it, making the rows four feet apart, plant from twelve to 
 sixteen quarts of ensilage corn per acre. 
 
 QUES. What time of the year do you think most suitable to plant 
 corn for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. Plant the first part of June. 
 
 QUES. About what is the cost per acre of raising corn-fodder for 
 ensilage ? 
 
7fi H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 ANS. The cost per acre would be: I should allow one-half the 
 cost of manure, I use fertilizer, Stockbridge, cost twenty dollars per 
 acre ; the labor would be ploughing, planting, and cultivating, which 
 would be about ten dollars. As to hoeing, it needs none. If planted 
 in June, the corn will grow so fast it will kill all weeds. 
 
 QUES. About how much corn- fodder for ensilage do you average 
 per acre ? 
 
 ANS. I raised, I think, about forty tons per acre. 
 
 QUES. How many acres do you plant for ensilage? 
 
 ANS. I planted four acres. 
 
 QUES. Do you plant or raise any grains or grasses for ensilage? 
 
 ANS. I cut several tons of second crop (rowen) for ensilage. 
 
 QUES. What do you think is the best machine for cutting fodder 
 for ensilage ? 
 
 ANS. I used Baldwin's improved fodder-cutter, said to be the 
 largest in New England, that would cut it short enough. 
 
 QUES. What length do you consider most suitable to cut corn- 
 fodder? 
 
 ANS. We cut a part three-sixteenths of an inch, and a part 
 three-eighths of an inch. It is slow work to cut it so short. 
 
 QUES. Will you give me your experience with silos? 
 
 ANS. I began to build my silo about the 20th of July. It was 
 built the same as a house-cellar, of stone, forty feet long, fifteen feet 
 wide, and fifteen feet deep. If we allow forty cubic feet to the ton, 
 it would hold two hundred and twenty-five tons of ensilage when 
 filled. 
 
 QUES. Your experience with cutting and packing corn-fodder for 
 ensilage in the silos ? 
 
 ANS. I finished my silo the last of August. Every thing worked 
 to a charm. I cut my corn-fodder with steam-power ; and in packing 
 I kept one man in the silo all the time tramping, and a part of the 
 time a man with horses tramping it down. When it was all in the 
 silo, and well tramped, I put on a covering of straw over the whole 
 of the ensilage, then planks on the straw, and stone and small rock 
 on top of the planks. This was done as soon as possible after I got 
 it filled. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider it costs per ton to raise the corn- 
 fodder from the seed, and have it thoroughly packed for ensilage in 
 the silos? 
 
 ANS. The cost of packing in the silos is from one dollar to one 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF J. P. GOODALE. 11 
 
 dollar twenty-five cents per ton. Allowing twenty dollars for Stock- 
 bridge fertilizer, ten dollars for labor, and one dollar per ton for put- 
 ting in the silos (and I have no doubt I raised forty tons to the acre), 
 and now allow ten dollars per acre for any extras there might be, 
 which added makes it cost eighty dollars per acre, or two dollars per 
 ton, packed in silo. 
 
 QUES. What do you consider would be the most practical size 
 and form of silos ? 
 
 ANS. For size and form, it would be best to suit the location. 
 
 QUES. What do }'ou consider the best and cheapest material for 
 building silos? Some are built of brick, some of stone and cement, 
 some of concrete, and some have been built up with plank with quite 
 good success. 
 
 ANS. About the building material, I should say what is handy 
 and the cheapest. 
 
 QUES. Have you opened your silos to feed ensilage to stock? If 
 so, did it come out satisfactory? 
 
 ANS. I opened my silo the first part of November ; and the ensi- 
 lage came out nice, as good as I could wish to have it. 
 
 QUES. Please give me your experience in feeding to stock, and 
 kind of stock. 
 
 ANS. We feed two bushels to a milch cow, with grain, cotton- 
 seed, and shorts, per da}', and no hay. The dry cows, no grain. The 
 oxen, the same as milch cows. We are feeding five fall calves on 
 ensilage with grain : they look first-rate. We are feeding eleven 
 cows, one bull, live calves, and one pair of oxen, with ensilage. 
 
 QUES. What time of clay do you take ensilage from the silo? 
 
 ANS. We take it from the silo morning and night. We take the 
 rocks off from the planks, and throw the ensilage up on the planks, 
 and take it from there into the barn as wanted. 
 
 QUES. How long do you let it stay exposed to the air before 
 feeding it to stock? 
 
 ANS. It is taken out sometimes two or three days ahead, and 
 sometimes right from the solid ensilage. 
 
 QUES. What quantity, and how often, do you feed? 
 
 ANS. We feed two bushels to a milch cow, with grain and shorts, 
 per day. 
 
 QUES. What do you think is the comparative cost of ensilage of 
 corn, or maize, with hay? 
 
 ANS. We are using nine hundred pounds of ensilage per day. 
 
78 77. fl. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 If we fed English ha}', it would take more than three hundred pounds 
 per day : 1 think a saving of one-half. 
 
 QUES. What is the effect of ensilage, compared with hay, upon 
 the milk and butter? 
 
 ANS. I think ensilage is good for milk : as to butter, we make 
 none. 
 
 QUES. When you first began to feed your stock upon ensilage, 
 did your cattle like it? Did they eat it as though they were hungry 
 for it? 
 
 ANS. My cows did not all eat it the first day, but by the third 
 day they all ate it. I have a pair of new oxen just bought to-day 
 that will not eat it. Some horses that come here will dive into a 
 basketful up to their eyes. 
 
 QUES. What quantity of ensilage do you consider will keep a 
 cow six months, or through the season for feeding? 
 
 ANS. I think sixty pounds per day will keep a cow. 
 
 QUES. What is the general appearance of cattle fed upon ensi- 
 lage? 
 
 ANS. The general appearance of cattle is that they gain flesh, 
 and generally look better than when fed on hay. 
 
 QUES. In regard to the success of ensilage, or the preserving of 
 our green crops for fodder for our stock, in what way is it going to be 
 of great profit, benefit, or saving, to our farmers ? 
 
 ANS. In regard to profit, it will be in raising a large amount of 
 fodder on a small quantity of land. 
 
 Quite a number of questions you ask, I am not prepared to answer. 
 Yours respectfully, 
 
 JACOB P. GOODALE, 
 
 Peabody, Mass. 
 Box 206. 
 
 It seems Mr. Goodale is feeding about twenty head of cattle in all 
 his stock. He feeds nine hundred pounds of ensilage per day. He 
 feeds grain with his ensilage, and would give same if he were feeding 
 hay ; perhaps not as much with ensilage as with hay. If he fed with 
 hay, it would take, as he says, over three hundred pounds per day to 
 take place of ensilage. His ensilage cost him two dollars per ton 
 packed in silo, making cost of nine hundred pounds, ninety cents, 
 a day's feed for his stock. If he fed three hundred pounds of hay, 
 twenty-five dollars per ton is now a low price, the cost per day 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF BUCKLEY BROTHERS. 79 
 
 would be $3.75, making a gain per clay of $2.65 in favor of ensilage. 
 In six months' time, or during the feeding season, the gain would be, 
 in favor of ensilage, $518.70 ; and, if fed on ensilage the year round, 
 would show a very handsome gain, which would be $1,037.40, to say 
 nothing of other advantages, increase of milk, butter, and better 
 condition of stock. 
 
 CIIAPTEE XIX. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 ZBiROTHiiEiRyS. 
 
 PORT JERVIS, N.Y., JAX. 27, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 I have not the time or the ability to answer all of your inquiries, as 
 we have them come from all quarters. We send 3*011 the enclosed 
 report : 
 
 " This morning the Buckley Brothers of this village opened one of 
 their silos on the farm of Charles Buckley, between Port Jervis and 
 Sparrowbush. The ensilage was found to be in fine condition ; and, 
 when fed to the cows, they ate it readily. There had been much 
 speculation as to whether the ensilage would be fit to eat when the 
 silos came to be opened, but there can no longer be any doubt on 
 this subject. 
 
 " Last summer Messrs. Buckley built two silos, to give the ensilage 
 system a test. The silos were put under the cow-stables ; and each 
 was nine by twenty-two feet, and fifteen and a half feet deep, built 
 side by side, with a two-foot wall between them. Into these were 
 put the green corn from about eight acres of land, making between 
 one hundred and twenty and a hundred and forty tons of fodder. 
 The corn-stalks were cut green at the tasselling, and were chopped 
 about half an inch in length. When the silos were filled, a layer of 
 straw was put upon them, and the planks were laid close together, 
 
80 II. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 running crosswise ; and, to press the air out, tons of stone were placed 
 upon the planks. The fodder had settled two feet. When the 
 planks were removed, a vinous or alcoholic odor arose. The surface 
 was found to be spoiled to the depth of about two inches. When 
 this was removed, the fodder was found to be sweet and nice ; and a 
 veiy pleasant odor saluted one. The fodder was warm, not too much 
 so, and seemed to preserve the same temperature as far down as we 
 could penetrate. 
 
 " The only thing which disappointed us was in the color of the 
 fodder. We had vaguely supposed it would preserve its green color ; 
 but, where we got the idea, we do not know. The ensilage, however, 
 is not green, but of a light brown or dark straw color. This is all 
 proper, we believe. 
 
 " Mr. Buckley had given his cattle their usual supply of hay in the 
 morning. When the silo was opened, the cattle were fed the ensi- 
 lage. Nearl}* all of them ate it with evident relish at once, Mr. 
 Buckley said ; and all ate it in time. When we yisited the stables 
 the cows had eaten all the better part of the ensilage, in fact, all 
 except the spoiled coating before alluded to ; and they were licking 
 the floor where it had lain. We threw some of it to them, and they 
 ate it eagerly. 
 
 " The opening of this silo convinces us that the proper way to 
 preserve fodder for cows, horses, sheep, and all farm-stock, is in the 
 form of ensilage. The nutritious qualities of all green food are pre- 
 served unimpaired, and it is relished by the cattle. For these rea- 
 sons it makes a superior fodder. Added to this is the fact, that it 
 ' goes farther ' than all other foods furnished, and enables the farmer 
 to keep at least one cow to every acre of land, and do it nicely and 
 advantageously. 
 
 " He will next summer build two more silos, and let ensilage be 
 the main fodder for his stock. We think it must in time become the 
 most economical way of keeping stock. Are well pleased with it. 
 Put eight cows on it for eight days, fed them their usual allowance 
 of feed and turnips the same as we fed with hay ; and at the end 
 of the eighth day, the cows had increased one and a half quarts a 
 day each." 
 
 Yours truly, 
 
 BUCKLEY BROTHERS. 
 
PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE. 81 
 
 CHAPTER XX. 
 
 PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE. 
 
 ZPIROIFESSOIR, 
 
 THE history of my first experiment with ensilage is as follows : 
 
 M}* attention having been particularly drawn to the process by the 
 published accounts of the French experiments, and being convinced 
 of its great agricultural promise, I determined, soon after nry arrival 
 here last September, 1879, to test the matter experimentally for 
 myself. To follow the directions laid down by Goffart, was simply 
 out of the question : the expense would have been too great ; and the 
 experiment, even if successful, would have possessed but little prac- 
 tical value for the farmers of the South. Not one in a thousand 
 would be able to build silos costing hundreds of dollars, and to buy 
 cutters and engines footing up hundreds more. It has ever been my 
 declared aim to make my experiments as simple and practical as pos- 
 sible, such as would have immediate value for the agricultural 
 public, and such as could, with moderate care and outla}', be success- 
 fully undertaken by any intelligent farmer. My ensilage experiment 
 was, therefore, purposely of the very simplest description. 
 
 A pit was prepared on the northern side of a small grove, and on 
 the edge of a dry knoll, nine feet long, six feet wide, and six feet 
 deep. The soil wis a strong, firm clay, over a close, dry, and com- 
 pact red clay subsoil. The sides of the pit were neither bricked up 
 nor cemented. Owing to the long-continued drought, the corn at the 
 time of cutting was dry and wilted. It was cut down when the ears 
 were beginning to fill, with sickles, about the middle of September, 
 and immediately carted to the pit after being weighed. It was care- 
 fully laid lengthwise in the pit, and closely packed, layer by la} T er. 
 
 The mass was carried up vertically six feet above the surface of the 
 pit, in order to allow for its settling. About three feet of the clay 
 
82 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 was then thrown on top, and it was allowed to stand for twenty-four 
 hours. At the expiration of that time it had settled down almost to 
 the surface. It was then heavily trampled, and more clay thrown on 
 the top and sides. In a day or so more the mass had settled down 
 well within the pit. The pit was closely watched for some time, and 
 all cracks covered up. It held thirteen thousand pounds of the green 
 corn. As its capacity was three hundred and twenty-four cubic feet, 
 the ensilage must have weighed about forty pounds to the cubic foot. 
 When opened on the 13th of December last, three months after it was 
 filled, the mass within was found to be sound and fresh, and but 
 slightl} 7 changed in appearance ; the edges and top alone, to the 
 depth of an inch or so, being somewhat damaged. 
 
 One end onlj r of the pit was opened. The soil was taken off from 
 this end, and the ensilage removed by cutting a slice out vertically 
 downwards. An axe had to be used for this purpose, so great was 
 the compression of the mass. After a few hours' exposure to air, 
 alcoholic fermentation set in. This food was greatly relished by the 
 stock. The end of the pit was left uncovered, except that a little 
 straw was thrown on top of the opened section. The ensilage was 
 fed out during the months of December, January, and February, 
 remaining sound and unaltered to the last. The plan pursued the 
 present season differed somewhat from the one just described. Two 
 additional silos were prepared. No. 2 (last year's silo being called 
 No. 1) was made and filled in the following way : 
 
 Like No. 1, it was simply a pit ten feet deep, ten feet wide, and 
 twenty feet long, dug in a dry and compact subsoil. The corn was 
 cut down (Aug. 4 and 5) with sickles, and immediately hauled to the 
 pits in carts, where it was dumped, after being weighed in an adjoin- 
 ing scales-room. It was then passed through a No. 11 Sinclair feed- 
 cutter driven by a one-horse railway (tread) power. This cutter 
 repeatedly sliced up a cartload weighing five hundred pounds, into 
 pieces one-half inch in length, in five minutes time. All the machine- 
 ry used was simple, and comparatively inexpensive, and such as 
 would be useful for many other farm purposes. The corn fell from 
 the cutter directly into the pit, where it was packed down by heavy 
 trampling. About thirty-five thousand pounds of corn were thus 
 packed away. 
 
 The upper part of the pit was filled with thirty-three thousand 
 pounds of green clover treated in the same. way; this crop packing 
 more closely than corn, and hence promising a more perfect protec- 
 
PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE. 83 
 
 tion from the .air. The mass was carried up vertically, three feet 
 above the surface of the pit. The pit was open three days, and the 
 ensilage had settled down very much during that time. The clover 
 was covered with a few inches of chaff, boards were placed trans- 
 versely across this, and above all the required weight (about one 
 hundred pounds to the square foot of surface). This weight was 
 furnished by a covering of red clay. Clay generally weighs about 
 eighty pounds to the cubic foot. In a few days the mass had settled 
 down to the surface. A rough shed gives protection from the 
 weather. The whole cost of "pitting" the corn, cutting it down, 
 hauling it to the cutter, slicing it up, packing it away in the pit, etc., 
 as before stated, was only $11.25 for 17.45 tons (the yields of six- 
 teen experimental plats) , or about sixty-eight and three-fourths cents 
 per ton. The cost of " pitting " the clover, where the mower could 
 be used to cut it down and the horse-rake to gather it up, was some- 
 thing less. The weather was overcast during the whole process, and 
 hence very favorable. After the lapse of several weeks the mass is 
 only an inch or so below the surface of the pit, and it will settle no 
 more. 
 
 As the pit had a capacity of two thousand cubic feet, and held but 
 sixty-eight thousand pounds of corn and clover, and was about full, 
 and could hold but little more, the pitted food, or ensilage, must have 
 weighed from thirty-four to thirty-five pounds to the cubic foot. 
 
 The old pit, No. 1, was filled this year in the same manner as No. 2, 
 after being enlarged and made eight feet deep, six feet wide, and nine 
 feet long. Its capacity was three hundred and ninety-six cubic feet. 
 It was filled entirely with green clover, cut up and packed down like 
 the corn. It held fifteen thousand four hundred pounds. The set- 
 tling after the same lapse of time is no greater than in the case of 
 No. 2. Hence, the weight of a cubic foot of "pitted" clover is 
 about thirty-five pounds, the same as that of corn. A cubic foot of 
 the corn put up last year weighed about thirty pounds. Hence, it is 
 safe to put the weight of ensilage at from thirty-five to forty pounds 
 to the cubic foot. It is generally estimated as high as fifty pounds. 
 
 Silo, or pit, No. 3 was eleven feet and a half deep, twenty feet 
 long, and ten feet wide, with a capacit} r of twenty-three hundred 
 cubic feet. It was our original intention to cement it within, the 
 cement to be applied directly to the clay walls. This method is 
 generall}' followed in the vicinity of this city in making cisterns, 
 and nearly always with success. But the pressure of other work, 
 
84 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 and more especially the unfavorable nature of the soil, interfered 
 with this plan ; and the silo is merely a pit like the others, but with 
 one end formed by the briek wall of a hill-side barn. The cattle are 
 stabled in the basement of this barn, and a door will be cut through 
 the partition wall so as to allow of convenient access to the pit. It 
 was filled in the same manner as the two preceding. The corn was 
 cut down Sept. 14 and 15. The weather was clear and diy during 
 the operation, and hence rather unfavorable. 43,538 pounds of 
 corn were first put down. For the sake of experiment, a thousand 
 pounds of common hay, five hundred pounds of clover hay, and five 
 hundred pounds of straw, were packed down in alternate kr^ers with 
 the corn in different portions of the silo. The upper part was filled 
 with 5,165 pounds of German millet, treated in the same way as the 
 corn. The millet was cut on the 16th of September. It was just 
 out of bloom. The filling took four days, and the mass settled down 
 greatly during that time. The pit was not quite full. A layer of 
 about six inches of straw was put on top of the ensilage ; boards 
 laid above this, in the manner already described, and twenty-one 
 thousand six hundred pounds of old brick placed above all, to give 
 the desired weight. This weight gave a pressure of one hundred 
 and eight pounds to the cubic foot. The pit is covered by a simple 
 shed. 
 
 From a careful comparison of the published results of numerous 
 experiments, I have every reason to believe that corn will keep as 
 well in pits dug in the naked clay, as in bricked-up and cemented 
 silos, provided the clay is dry and compact. The chief drawback to 
 the use of such pits is their liability to cave in when emptied of the 
 ensilage in the spring. If this can be prevented by temporaiy sup- 
 ports, props, etc., then my experience and observation, thus far, is 
 in favor of this kind of silo, the cheapest and the simplest yet 
 described. A correspondent of " The Country Gentleman " contends 
 that ensilage will keep better in such pits. He states that he has 
 experimented for a number of years past with brewer's grain, en- 
 deavoring to discover the best mode of keeping it. He has tried 
 stone, brick, and cemented vaults, barrels and wooden vats, and 
 found none to compare with pits dug in a good clay or other dry 
 soil. He is inclined to attribute the superiority of these to the pre- 
 servative action of the soil itself. 
 
 There may be something in this. Soils are known to possess 
 remarkable absorptive and antiseptic properties. It is more than 
 
PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENSILAGE. 85 
 
 probable, however, that the earthen walls allow of the more easy and 
 rapid escape of the air enclosed in the mass of vegetable matter, 
 the superincumbent pressure being sufficient to force it out into the 
 interstices, which are found even in the most finely comminuted 
 cla}"S. In cemented silos this air can only escape at the top, through 
 the covering of straw and boards. A few words as to the rationale 
 of the process. The great object to be attained is the thorough ex- 
 clusion of air, which contains oxygen, the great agent of deca} T . 
 Goffart, until quite recently, held that the ensilage underwent some 
 kind of fermentation which preserved it from further decay. With- 
 in the last few years, however, he has "become convinced." he 
 does not give us the grounds of his conviction, that the ensilage 
 is preserved absolutely unchanged, and that it does not ferment 
 until after its removal from the silo, and its subsequent exposure to 
 air. Others, notably Dr. Baile}', contend, as before remarked, that 
 the oxygen of the small amount of air left in the mass unites with 
 the carbon of the vegetable matter, and forms carbonic acid, which 
 bathes the mass, and expels, by its superiority of weight, the scant}'' 
 residuum of air, and prevents its re-entrance. 
 
 All this seems to be mere hypothesis : what we want are facts. 
 But, even in a theoretical point of view, such changes do not neces- 
 sarily occur. No one, not even Goffart, would contend that there is 
 a perfect exclusion of air, and that all has been expelled from the 
 vegetable matter. Now, it is highly probable that the oxygen of this 
 included air, instead of combining with the carbon of the ternary 
 principles of the plant, unites with its albuminoids. It is well known 
 that nitrogenous matters, such as flesh, white of eggs, blood, fibrin, 
 gluten, etc., are the first to decay or putrefy. This putrefaction is 
 induced by their union with the oxygen of the air. In the presence 
 of the sugar, starch, and other amylaceous principles of the corn, its 
 decaying albuminous matters act as ferments, and convert the sugar, 
 etc., into alcoholic and carbonic acid ; in other words, induce alco- 
 holic fermentation. But, as the corn, etc., has but a small content 
 of albuminoids, the fermentation is soon arrested, for want of mate- 
 rial (ferment). Hence the fermentation is slight, and the mass 
 remains comparatively unchanged. In my experiment of last year, 
 the pitted corn, or ensilage, at the opening of the pit, was not alto- 
 gether unchanged. There was every evidence of some alcoholic fer- 
 mentation : the mass was slightly discolored, presenting the boiled 
 appearance of the grass preserved by the East Prussian method before 
 described, and possessed an alcoholic taste and odor. 
 
86 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER XXL 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 CT^:M::ES s. 
 
 WASSAIC, N. Y., FEB. 7, 1881 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS, Boston, Mass. 
 
 Dear Sir : 
 
 Yours of the 31st ult. at hand. In reply, I will endeavor to 
 partially answer your questions, thus stating what little I know about 
 ensilage, and thus fulfil the requests made by you. 
 
 I consider the variety of Southern corn known as "White Nor- 
 folk" to be best suited for ensilage. "Blunt's Prolific" may be 
 better, but I have had no experience with it. The corn should be 
 a large-stalk-producing variety ; as large stalks, beside giving a larger 
 yield per acre, are much better suited for ensilage than smaller ones. 
 
 Plant in drills, with sufficient width between the rows to permit of 
 horse cultivation, and use not to exceed one bushel of seed per acre. 
 
 Upon a piece of five acres that I raised last season, I compute the 
 whole cost per acre of planting and cultivation, exclusive of fer- 
 tilizers, to be about seven dollars and thirty cents ; and, as the 
 average product was thirty tons, it makes the cost of labor per ton 
 less than twenty-five cents. 
 
 I have not as yet raised any grains or grasses for ensilage, other 
 than corn. 
 
 I have used for cutting ensilage the Telegraph fodder-cutter, 
 manufactured by Willson Brothers & Co., of Harrisburg, Penn. I 
 like this machine very much : it does its work thoroughly and easily, 
 although its capacity (about five tons per hour) may be too limited 
 for some. 
 
 The ensilage should be cut a half -inch in length, or less. I cut, 
 last season, about five-eighths of an inch in length, at the rate of 
 twenty-five to thirty tons per day ; packed and tramped it down 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF JAMES 8. CHAFFEE. 87 
 
 thoroughly, in a silo fifty feet long, twelve feet wide, and sixteen 
 feet in depth. When the ensilage was all in, six inches of uncut 
 wheat straw was placed on the top, the whole being covered with an 
 inch and a quarter spruce plank, of sufficient length to reach across 
 the silo, and fit closely between the walls. These planks were weight- 
 ed with stone, at the rate of a hundred pounds to the square foot. 
 The ensilage was about fourteen feet deep : it settled some three feet. 
 
 When the plank and stone were taken off at one end, two months 
 after they were placed thereon, there was found to be a little at the 
 top unfit for use ; but the remainder of the mass, nearly eleven feet 
 in depth, had fermented somewhat, was brown in color, of a slightly 
 alcoholic odor. On being placed before the cattle, some ate it at 
 once, with an evident relish ; and, in a day or two, every animal of 
 a herd of fifty would eat ensilage in preference to any other forage. 
 
 I think the cost should not exceed two dollars per ton, all expenses 
 told, to grow ensilage, pack it in the silo, and place it before the 
 animal for consumption. I should advise a parallelogram, the 
 length three or four times the width, depth sixteen to twenty feet, 
 corners rounded, or filled in. to make the angles as obtuse as possible, 
 as being the most practical form of silo. 
 
 It should be constructed of masonry ; and, if cobble-stones and 
 gravel are easily obtained, concrete walls will be the cheapest, and as 
 durable as any other. For one month I fed thirty milch cows twice 
 daily upon ensilage, giving them from sixty to seventy pounds each 
 per day, with about ten per cent of that weight additional in oil-meal, 
 wheat, shorts, and hominy-chop. There is nothing I have ever used, 
 unless it may be roots, and plenty of them, that will make a flow of 
 milk equal to ensilage of fodder-corn, for winter feeding. 
 
 I am now feeding ensilage but once per day, as I have not suffi- 
 cient to last until spring without supplementing with hay. 
 
 The ensilage is fed in the morning ; being taken from the silo the 
 previous day, and exposed to the air for fifteen to eighteen hours, 
 with no bad results, and apparently no change as to its chemical 
 properties. It is fed to milch cows, and the same rations grains are 
 used as when feeding hay or other forage. I do not think it will cost 
 more than one-half as much to winter a cow with ensilage as it will 
 with dry fodder, while the milk products will be certainly five per 
 cent greater. 
 
 A neighbor of mine has made the experiment of feeding a portion 
 of his dairy upon ensilaged corn, while another portion were fed 
 
88 IT. -R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 upon hay ; and the milk of the cows fed upon ensilage being tested 
 by experienced parties, was found to be much superior in quality to 
 the milk made from hay, the ration of grain being the same in both 
 cases. I have cut and steamed my dried forage for my stock for a 
 number of years ; but I find the silo effects a great saving of labor, 
 compared with the steam-box, while the product of the latter is in 
 every way inferior to the well-preserved contents of the former. I 
 think a ton of ensilage, with ten per cent of its weight additional of 
 oil-meal, wheat, shorts, etc., is sufficient feed, and will keep an 
 average milking-cow in good condition and flow of milk for one 
 month ; and, being fed at that rate, the cow wintered upon ensilage 
 will thrive better, look sleeker, drink less water, and spring-time will 
 find her in better condition, than when fed upon hay, while the flow 
 of milk will be considerably greater. 
 
 I keep no sheep, but have had some experience with them in past 
 years, and should consider ensilage a valuable food for them. 
 
 Ensilage, or the preserving of green crops for winter feeding, will 
 be of great benefit to stock ; as it will give them a juicy, succulent 
 food, easily masticated and digested, in place of the dry, hard, and 
 woody forage furnished by the mow or stack. 
 
 Ensilage will be a great profit, and effect a great saving, to the 
 farmer, as it will certainly permit of his keeping double the animals 
 in winter kept by the old method, and at the same expense. 
 
 I do not as yet know how successfully ensilage may be used as a 
 summer food : time and experiment will tell that. 
 
 I have practised soiling somewhat ; and possibly ensilage will so 
 supplement soiling that we may keep our cattle at the barn the year 
 round. Ensilage is a subject to-day of more importance to the 
 farmers of the older States than all others combined, and I cannot 
 commend it too highly to my brother farmers : at the same time, I do 
 not wish to give such rose-colored accounts of the results of feeding 
 ensilage as will tend to raise doubts, and make the statement seem 
 improbable. I should be pleased to see your work when published ; 
 and, if any thing I have written is of any service to you, you are 
 welcome to use it ; or, if I can aid you any further in the matter, 
 advise me, and I shall be happy to respond. 
 
 Respectfully yours, 
 
 JAMES S. CHAFFEE. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF 0. li. POTTER. 89 
 
 CHAPTER XXII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 :M::R,- o. IB. IFOTTEIR,. 
 
 NEW YORK, N.Y., JAN. 31, 1881. 
 
 H. R. STEVENS, ESQ. 
 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 Though I think my address before the State Agricultural 
 which I mail }'ou, gives pretty fully my experience, I will try to 
 answer your inquiries further, as well as my experience enables me. 
 
 I have practised this S} T stem for three years ; have applied it to 
 common fodder-corn, red clover, pearl-millet, West-India millet, or 
 Guinea-corn, green rye, green oats, and mixed grasses in which 
 clover predominated, with entire success in every case. The last 
 year I preserved about one hundred tons ; and during this summer I 
 have put down about two hundred tons, and have added sorghum 
 and sugar-cane to the varieties of fodder I have before preserved. I 
 have never lost an} r fodder whatever thus preserved ; but, during the 
 whole experiment, it has been perfectly preserved, and better than 
 when fed fresh and green from the field. As the first fermentation is 
 passed in the process, the food thus preserved has no tendency either 
 to scour or bloat the animals fed. It is eaten up eagerly and clean, 
 leaf and stalk, without an} r loss whatever ; and stock thus fed exhibit 
 the highest condition of health and thrift. For milch cows, to which 
 I have mainl}' fed it, it surpasses any other food I have ever tried. 
 It increases the quanthty of milk much beyond dried food, and the 
 quality is better than that produced from the same fodder when fed 
 fresh and green from the field. 
 
 As you will see by my report, I cure all my corn, clover, green 
 iye, green oats, by this process. I always cut m} r clover twice, and 
 sometimes three times, in a season. I put down last year- the past 
 summer four acres green rye, two acres green oats, about twenty 
 acres clover, and five to six acres of corn. 
 
90 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 I use the Daniels large-sized cutter, and thus far have used a one- 
 horse-power to drive it. I intend trying to get the maker of that 
 cutter to make one larger, to be driven by a two-horse-power ; but 
 his present largest size cutter, with single horse-power, will cut the 
 fodder as fast as two men can feed the machine. 
 
 The finer the fodder is cut, the closer and better it will pack. I 
 cut mine about one inch. 
 
 Make the silos narrow, not more than ten feet wide, air-tight, 
 weather-sealed, and the deeper the better. The bottom of the pit 
 will hold and turn out much more than the top, because the fodder 
 becomes more compact, like hay in a deep ha3*mow. 
 
 It costs less than half, in time and labor, to raise and make ready 
 for feeding a fodder crop by this process, than to cure the same by 
 dr}*ing ; and I think the same crop, cured by this process, worth 
 more than twice it would be if dried. 
 
 Silos should be made from seven to ten feet wide, and as deep as 
 possible, with close walls, and doors dividing them, as shown in my 
 report. The reason of this arises from the fact, that, when 3*011 fill a 
 silo, it is best to fill it up as soon as possible, not more than one to 
 two days, and then cover it from the air, and leave it to ferment 
 and settle as fast as it will, while you fill the next. If your silo is so 
 large that 3*011 can put but a foot or two in depth in it 1)3* one day's 
 work, it will not ferment as well as if filled and covered and left to 
 ferment. Sections should not be more than twenty feet long, ten 
 feet wide, and fifteen feet deep. It will take about seventy-five tons 
 of green corn, before cut, to fill one section, and from one to two 
 da3*s to fill it the first filling. 
 
 It is also important the sections be small, in order that when 
 opened for second, third, or fourth fillings, as each must be, the 
 fermented and heated mass then in the pit be exposed to the air as 
 littte as possible, and, when only a small pit is opened, the new fod- 
 der can be at once poured in, and the air will yet be excluded from 
 the heated mass below. 
 
 The green fodder is drawn from the field as fast as cut, and may 
 be cut in any weather, except during rain. After running through 
 the cutting-machine, it is deposited and trod into the pit firmly, until 
 the pit is full. The doorway at the end of this pit, having already 
 been closed by placing boards across it upon the inside as the filling 
 progressed, is now sealed tightly by placing other boards properly 
 fastened across it upon the outside of the jambs, and filling the space 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF O. B. POTTER. 91 
 
 between the jambs with well-compacted earth, so that no air can pass 
 into the pit through this doorway. 
 
 In feeding out the pits, when made in short sections, all chance of 
 deterioration from exposure te the air is avoided by opening one 
 small pit at a time. % 
 
 All ensilage I have put down, came out more than satisfactory. 
 This is the fourth year I have practised ensilage, and I never lost 
 ten pounds in putting down several hundred tons. 
 
 I have fed moving milch cows with ensilage, because I cannot 
 spare this food to dry stock. 
 
 I take out the ensilage usually when I feed it. 
 
 I cut down a slice one to two feet wide as wanted, and feed as cut, 
 and have not found reason to expose it more than it is exposed in 
 distributing in the mangers. I always give my milch cows about 
 three quarts meal per day, corn or barley, or sometimes two quarts 
 other, and one quart cotton-seed meal. Sometimes I put the meal 
 on the ensilage, but usually on the cut hay, moistened, which I feed 
 at night. This is best ; as no meal is needed to make the cow eat the 
 green fodder clean, while it is often needed to make her eat the hay 
 clean. I can't compare cost of corn-fodder with hay, better than any 
 one else. I have sowed fodder-crops, corn, clover, grass more than 
 half clover, yard-millet, West India millet, sorghum, and sugar-cane. 
 I am certain it costs less than half to raise and prepare for feeding 
 by this process, than by drying and cutting afterwards, and are 
 worth twice as much. 
 
 Two fodder-crops per year are easily grown the same year on the 
 same ground, unless it be sorghum and cane ; and there are no ex- 
 ceptions here and farther South, the first being sown early, and no 
 time lost in putting in the second crop after first is off. My cows 
 always ate ensilage from the start willingly without urging. I have 
 not fed my cattle much with ensilage. I can't spare it for them 
 till I get more pits. I have computed how much ensilage will feed 
 a cow six months : it will depend on the cow, the kind of ensilage, 
 and how well you feed her. The same food cured this way will make 
 more milk and flesh than if dried. 
 
 Cattle fed on ensilage as I feed them are sleek and fat and healthy, 
 and always fit for the butcher when milked dry. They look better 
 and do better than when fed on dry food only. I do not keep sheep, 
 but fed six on corn ensilage for several weeks, and they did finely ; 
 never saw any do better, and all brought fine lambs, and both dams 
 
92 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 and lambs were healthy. Don't know what it costs to keep sheep ; 
 less than on same crops fed dry, because they ate all stalk and leaf 
 clean. I think sheep thrive fully as well on ensilage as on hay : can't 
 say further. 
 
 I practised " soiling " until I learned ensilage, but not since, as I 
 consider this method of feeding much the best. 
 
 In addition to the fact that fodder thus preserved has no tendency 
 to scour or bloat cattle, another important advantage is gained by this 
 process. These fodder-crops may be allowed to attain a much larger 
 and more substantial growth before cutting than is practicable when 
 the same crops are fed fresh from the field. 
 
 During my absence from home in the summer of 1879, my foreman 
 had inadvertently allowed a field of about four acres of pearl-millet to 
 attain so large and hard a growth that my cows wholly rejected the 
 stalks, and would eat only the leaves when the millet was offered 
 them green. 
 
 By way of experiment, and without much confidence in the result, 
 I cut about one-fourth of this field, and filled one of my pits with it. 
 The remainder of the field was cured by drying in shocks in the 
 ordinary way. This last was found so near worthless for feeding 
 dry, that it was used for litter in the barnyards, and for covering 
 ice. That preserved in the pit was opened and fed in April last. 
 My cows ate it all, leaf and stalk, eagerly, without any loss or waste 
 whatever ; and it was fully equal in value to the same quantity of the 
 best corn-fodder preserved in the pits. 
 
 First, The preserving pits must be wholly air-tight, so that when 
 sealed the air cannot come in contact with the food preserved. 
 
 Second, The pits should be of such form and dimensions as will 
 best facilitate the settling and compacting of the food into a solid 
 mass, and when opened for feeding will expose as small a part of the 
 surface to the atmosphere as practicable. 
 
 Third, The fodder must be cut green, when in the best condition 
 or in bloom, passed immediately through the cutting-machine to 
 reduce it to uniform short lengths of not more than one inch, and at 
 once be deposited and trod firmly into the pit ; sufficient salt being 
 used to render it palatable, but no more. As fermentation, which 
 will commence at once, proceeds, and the mass settles, the cutting 
 and treading-in of fresh fodder must be continued at intervals of 
 thirty-six to forty-eight hours (depending upon the rapidity with 
 which fermentation and settling proceeds) , until settling has ceased, 
 and no more can be trod into the pit. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF O. B. POTTER. 93 
 
 Fourth, The pit as soon as completely filled, and settling has 
 ceased, must be securely sealed to exclude the air wholly and arrest 
 fermentation, and must be kept so sealed until opened for use. 
 
 The pits being now full, and settling having nearly or quite ceased, 
 must be immediately and thoroughly sealed over the whole top surface 
 of the fodder by a well-compacted layer of clean earth not less than 
 six inches thick. This covering of earth should be afterwards exam- 
 ined at least twice, at intervals of a week or ten days, and any cracks 
 that appear be closed with fresh earth. A covering of straw or hay 
 not more than two inches thick may be laid over the fodder before 
 the earth covering is applied, but this is immaterial other than as a 
 matter of neatness. In feeding, the fodder should be cut down and 
 fed from one end of the pit in sections of convenient width, the earth 
 being first removed from each section. If open pits are used, a layer 
 of hay or straw may be put over the pit when filled and sealed, to 
 protect the contents from frost in winter, if necessary. I have not 
 found any pressure or weight upon the fodder other than the earth- 
 covering required. If additional weight is desired, a heavier covering 
 of earth will accomplish this, and make the sealing at the same time 
 more perfect. 
 
 MIXING FODDER IN THE PITS. 
 
 Much advantage will be gained by mixing clover and grass t in 
 which clover predominates, in the same pit through fodder-corn, 
 millet, or sorghum. The clover becomes, after the first fermenta 
 tion, a putty-like mass, which fills the interstices in coarser and more 
 fibrous fodder, and thus makes the whole much more compact and 
 weighty than it would otherwise be> while it improves the quality of 
 the food. 
 
 By this system, red-clover, fodder-corn, pearl-millet, or Guinea- 
 corn, hitherto the most uncertain, difficult, and expensive, to cure 
 and preserve of all our crops, become the easiest and least expensive 
 in these respects, while their value as cattle-food is greatly increased 
 over the same crops cured by drying in the usual mode. This system, 
 when understood and practised throughout the country, may become 
 no mean factor in our national prosperity. 
 
 By it, through the great increase of the best cattle-food, which 
 may be produced at greatly-diminished cost upon the worn lauds of 
 the Eastern and Middle States, these lands may be renewed and 
 enriched, and their owners be materially aided, especially in dairying, 
 
94 H. B. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 in their now difficult competition with the cheaper and richer lands of 
 the West. 
 
 By it, also, the Southern States, below the line of our Northern 
 grasses, are enabled to feed and fatten their cattle in winter and 
 summer as well, and nearly or quite as cheaply, as where tame grasses 
 abound. 
 
 If I can aid the farmers of Massachusetts any by my opinions, I 
 shall be glad. I was bred upon a farm in Charlemont, Mass. ; and if 
 the same energy, attention, and pluck were in operation there now, 
 upon the farms, the hills would be green and covered with flocks to 
 their tops, and that State would be less dependent than now on the 
 West and South, while we would continue to be the nursery of hardy 
 manhood for business and the nation. I shall be glad to see and 
 read your book. 
 
 Very truly yours, 
 
 O. B. POTTER, 
 26 Lafayette Place (Farm at Sing Sing, N.Y.). 
 
 CHAPTER XXIII. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 CTA-OOIB 
 
 WASSAIC, N.Y., FEB. 5, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 Yours in relation to ensilage is just received. Your questions are 
 very comprehensive to be answered by one who has had but one sea- 
 son's experience, and that by no means thorough : consequently, I 
 must first confess that on many points I should be a very blind guide, 
 and can support my opinions by very few facts. 
 
 I will take up your questions in order. 
 
 I am quite sure that the large-growing Southern corn is best adapted 
 for the purpose of ensilage^ ; but new varieties with stronger tendency 
 
COliRESPONDENCE OF JACOB PUGSLEY. 95 
 
 to great size uud product of sugar may soon be produced, or perhaps 
 are already to be found. 
 
 The cost varies so much in different localities, owing to price of 
 labor and quality of soil, that my statement is worthless, except for 
 this vicinity. For me, about five dollars per acre is the cost of getting 
 the corn ready for the sickle, then about seventy-five cents per ton 
 for putting in the silo, if it is not to be hauled more than one-fourth 
 mile. This does not include any fertilizers. 
 
 My corn was on a poor field, with no manure. It yielded about 
 twelve tons per acre. The season was rather favorable to a large 
 growth of stalks. 
 
 I have not ensilaged any thing but corn. Shall put up some clover 
 and grass next year. 
 
 I used a Daniels cutter, which worked very well. I have no 
 knowledge of other machines, but think that a much larger one with 
 more powerful feed-rollers would be better. 
 
 A length of less than three-fourths inch has proved satisfactory. 
 I would advise cutting shorter rather than longer. I have built one 
 silo of two compartments, each twenty-five by sixteen feet, and ten 
 feet deep ; shall raise the walls to fourteen feet next season. I com- 
 menced the work late, and the walls were not properly hardened when 
 it was full, so that I did not dare put on more than six inches of 
 stone. 
 
 The ensilage was a little more sour than I expected, owing, I think, 
 entirely to the air not being sufficiently driven out by pressure. Still 
 the cattle eat it well, and do well on it, though not as greedy for it as 
 in other cases reported. 
 
 I employed four men to cut the corn, and lay it on wagons, which 
 were driven close beside the corn, three men at the cutter (I do not 
 doubt that in a year or two we shall get on just as well with only one 
 at the cutter) , and two men in the silo to level and pack the ensilage, 
 the silo standing with one end in side hill, so that the cutter was at 
 the top, also a boy to drive teams ; in all, ten men and four teams. 
 Part of these I hired for the job, and part were my own men and 
 teams. We put up twenty tons per day, working about four-fifths of 
 the day. Counting my own men and teams at the same rate as those 
 I hired, the cost was seventy-five cents per ton, including board of 
 men and teams. The cost per ton of ensilage varies so much with 
 the quality of land, and the season, that one year's trial is hardly a 
 safe basis for an opinion. Allowing six per cent on twice the selling 
 
96 n. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 value of the land, my own cost me about two dollars per ton in the 
 silo. 
 
 In regard to size and shape of silo, every thing would depend on 
 the size of farm and the method of using ensilage. If one intended to 
 make the ensilage merely a small adjunct to the other farming, then a 
 comparatively large single silo would be best ; but my own opinion is, 
 that, where ensilage is practised, the whole arable portion of the farm 
 will be devoted to it ; and in this case smaller silos, holding about a 
 hundred and twenty-five tons each, will be far better, as we shall 
 have a succession of crops to put in. Also, one of the smaller silos 
 can be filled sooner, which I regard as of much importance. To hold 
 the above amount, a silo must be twenty-five feet long, sixteen feet 
 wide, and fourteen feet deep, and must be filled a second time after 
 the first filling has settled. Six such silos in a set will hold feed for 
 a hundred cows, allowing one each for rye and millet, and two each 
 for clover and corn. Then, in feeding, a variety can be given each 
 day. If built in this way the silos would, of course, be placed side 
 by side ; being, in fact, one great silo with partitions, each compart- 
 ment having its own opening into the stable. 
 
 In nine cases out of ten, concrete of water-lime, sand, and small 
 stones, will be far cheaper and better than any other material. 
 
 I have been feeding ensilage once a day to cows for three months ; 
 have fed no other stock. 
 
 The cows eat it clean, and do well on it. Some that I have fed 
 for two weeks on ensilage three times a day, and no other food 
 except about eight pounds of corn-meal and bran, have gained fully 
 ten per cent in milk ; previously, they were fed the same grain, ensi- 
 lage once a day, and good hay ad libitum. 
 
 It is immaterial as to what time of the day it is fed. I do not 
 expose the ensilage to the air before feeding, as fermentation has 
 already progressed a little too far, owing to the air not being thor- 
 oughly expelled by pressure immediately after filling the silo. 
 
 No perceptible change takes place in the ensilage, if thrown down 
 in a heap for two or three days before feeding. This may be owing 
 to the cold weather ; though I think not, but suppose the ensilage to 
 be in a condition which does not specially induce further decomposi- 
 tion. 
 
 I feed about twenty pounds once a day to each of my cows, eight 
 pounds grain, and what hay they will eat. 
 
 I think six tons of ensilage can be put up as cheaply as one ton of 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF JACOB PUGSLEY. 97 
 
 good hay, including in expenses all labor and interest on land. Good 
 hay cannot be produced at less than twelve dollars per ton, and I think 
 ensilage can be as easily furnished at two dollars. 
 
 My milk is sold to a condensing factory : the inspector could not 
 detect any marked difference between that made on ensilage and that 
 made from hay. 
 
 The difference in cost of feeding on ensilage or on hay would not 
 be important, probably rather in favor of ensilage, if stables and 
 silos were properly arranged. 
 
 Nearly all my cows ate the ensilage at the first feeding, and all of 
 them after the second or third ration. 
 
 I have no sheep. 
 
 I am convinced that we shall soon be feeding our cattle upon ensi- 
 lage in the summer, as well as in winter, though I have never prac- 
 tised soiling. 
 
 After weighing my feed with some care, I am satisfied that fifty- 
 five pounds per day of ensilage, with eight pounds of grain, is a full 
 feeding for a cow of ordinary size, giving not more than ten quarts 
 of milk per day. Heavier milkers should have more grain, which 
 should not be corn, but oats, bran, linseed or cotton-seed meals. 
 This refers to corn ensilage ; probably clover, rye, or millet would 
 take much less of both grain and ensilage. 
 
 I do not see any marked difference in the appearance of cattle fed 
 on hay or on ensilage. I think the chief points for most farmers 
 to bear in mind in going into this system are : First, good walls to 
 the silo. Any farmer can make these by getting clean sand and good 
 cement, and following the directions given for mixing and laying 
 walls ; and this should be done in the spring, so as to allow plenty of 
 time for the walls to harden, before any strain is put on them. Sec- 
 ond, cutting the ensilage short. I think a very large cutter, and 
 steam-power for driving it, will be found best and cheapest in the 
 end. Small farmers could combine to purchase these, and also in 
 the labor of filling their silos. Third, quick filling of silos, not more 
 than three days at most. 
 
 Indeed, wherever practicable, I should advise that the silo be filled, 
 and the stone put on, in one day, even at some extra expense. This 
 point is not insisted upon by writers on the subject, but I shall need 
 considerable experience to convince me that it is not a very important 
 matter. Fourth, heavy pressure, not less than one foot of stone and 
 more, if possible, should be placed on the ensilage, instantly after 
 
98 H. It. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 filling. Whoever will carry out thoroughly these four demands of 
 the system, will be more than satisfied with ensilage. 
 
 The advantages of ensilage are several. In the first place, it will 
 enable any active farmer to keep twice his present amount of an}* 
 kind of stock, and, within three years, to raise fodder for a cow on 
 every acre of arable land, and also to increase this amount thereafter 
 indefinitely ; being practically limited only by his personal capacity 
 and judgment. At present prices of cheese and butter, there would 
 be twent} r dollars per acre net profit for every acre, which would keep 
 a cow, after paying for all labor and grain. 
 
 The system being equally adapted to feeding sheep, or hogs, or 
 making beef, will prevent any undue increase of dairying. The 
 remoter consequences of the greats-increased production of the soil 
 are incalculable : the lessening of labor, the improvement of food, 
 and many like advantages, will soon follow the general inauguration 
 of this s} r stem. 
 
 It will also assist enormously in making mankind independent of 
 the weather ; for the constant use of the plough and cultivator, and the 
 raising of strong, growing crops, will greatly obviate the difficulties 
 from drought ; while the serious loss and expense of harvesting crops 
 in wet seasons will be very greatly diminished by this method of pre- 
 serving. Very great improvements will, doubtless, soon be made in 
 all the machinery for harvesting crops, so as to reduce the labor ne- 
 cessary as much proportionately as it is done in manufacturing, com- 
 pared with the processes of thirty years ago. It is quite probable, 
 too, that farming on this system will become attractive to men of 
 executive capacity, and that organizing faculty which has hitherto 
 sought its fields of action everywhere except on the farm, to the great 
 detriment of agriculture. If I have omitted any thing essential, you 
 can write me again. I expect to increase my silos materially next 
 season. 
 
 Yours, 
 
 J. PUGSLEY. 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF F. S. PEER. 91) 
 
 CHAPTER XXIV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 . IF. s. IFIEIEIR,. 
 
 E. PALMYRA, N.Y. 
 
 MY DEAR SIR : 
 
 In reply to your request concerning the result of my experience 
 with " ensilage," it may not be out of place to say that 1 did not 
 adopt the system because it was a new thing, nor as an experiment ; 
 for I have neither time to devote nor money to expend on uncertain- 
 ties, but because through the evidence of my five senses I was con- 
 vinced that it was practical. I saw stock of all kinds eating and 
 thriving. I tasted, and found nothing disagreeable. In smelling could 
 detect nothing offensive ; and when I heard, from men on whose word 
 and judgment I could rely, the same universal testimony of its mer- 
 its, I began to feel that it was no longer an experiment, but the legiti- 
 mate offspring of the mother of invention, which like other great 
 improvements are born to the day of necessity. 
 
 It was therefore without a misgiving that I set to work overhauling 
 an old stone carriage-house. It was easily converted into a silo by 
 taking out the hay-loft floor and stalls before walling up the doors and 
 windows, except one in the gable end, through which the silo was 
 filled ; another in the opposite end on the ground, nearly level with 
 the bottom of the silo, which we find very convenient in taking out 
 the ensilage. The walls were given a coat of water-lime, the floor of 
 cement. The building was eighteen by twenty-eight feet and fifteen 
 feet deep, inside measurement ; capacity three hundred tons. 
 
 Were I to build new, should make the building longer and nar- 
 rower, say fourteen by forty feet, and fifteen or eighteen feet deep. 
 The deeper the better. It takes no more plank or weight to press 
 ensilage that is fifteen feet in depth than it does five, and requires no 
 more roofing. 
 
100 H. K. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 My experience in growing corn-fodder is, that it is much better 
 sown in drills, three or three and a half feet apart. It then can be 
 cultivated, which will add at least one- third to its growth. 
 
 As the broad leaves of the growing corn receive from the air and 
 sun a large per cent of its feeding value, it is therefore very essen- 
 tial that the stalks should have plenty of room for the full develop- 
 ment of its leaves ; for in them is contained the principal virtue of the 
 plant as a food. Therefore, in determining what kind of corn is best 
 to grow for fodder, the most leafy variety should be selected. I find 
 the Western Dent to be better in this respect, than our common field- 
 corn. 
 
 Last season we sowed at the rate of two, two and a half, and three 
 bushels of corn per acre. I am convinced that two are sufficient. 
 We put it in with our common field-grain drill, letting the tubes of 
 tooth No. 1 and 3 discharge into No. 2, closing No. 4, letting 5 and 
 7 into No. 6, closing 8, uniting 9 and 11 into No. 10. 
 
 In a nine-tooth drill begin by closing No. 1, and proceed as above 
 described. The eleven-tooth drill puts in 3, the nine-tooth drill 2, 
 rows at a time, the wheel-tracks serving as a guide on return bouts. 
 
 Began harvesting the fodder, one man managed the reaper, two to 
 bind, assisted occasionally by the one who reaped. Two men, each 
 with a one-horse lumber- wagon, drew the fodder to the silo, one load- 
 ing in the field while the other was unloading at the cutter, a " Silver 
 and Deming," manufactured at Salem, O., with a twelve-foot carrier 
 attached, to convey the fodder into the silo. 
 
 After cutting it three-eighths of an inch long, which it did as fast 
 as two men could feed it, it was run by an eight-horse-power thresh- 
 ing-engine, thirty to forty pounds of steam being sufficient to run it, 
 four knives making five hundred and fifty to six hundred revolutions 
 per minute. A man was employed in the building, to spread and 
 tread down the fodder. Besides the engineer, eight men were four 
 days doing the work, putting in five and a half acres at the rate of 
 forty tons per day. We supposed that five acres would be enough 
 to fill the silo ; but, with the addition of a half-acre, it was then but 
 half-filled. 
 
 When through cutting, we covered the fodder with a foot and a 
 half of uncut straw, on which we placed a covering of rough two- 
 inch hemlock plank : on them was piled stone a foot or more in depth. 
 The silo was opened Nov. 12 ; and the fodder was found in a good 
 condition, except up and down the door-jamb some ten or twelve 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF F. S. PEER. 101 
 
 bushels were spoiled. We began forthwith to feed ensilage to all my 
 stock, sheep, colts, calves, and milch-cows, at the rate of fifty 
 bushels per day. 
 
 Having no personal knowledge of the chemical analysis of ensi- 
 lage, I do not propose to enter upon a hair-splitting discussion of its 
 value as compared with other feed. The question that every practi- 
 cal farmer wants to know is, "What is the result?" I will state 
 as briefly as possible what I have found to be its influence as a feed 
 for milch-cows, upon the quantity, qualit} r , and color of butter. 
 
 Before opening the silo, we fed corn-stalks, having no hay, morn- 
 ing and night, wheat-straw at noon. As may be supposed, the but- 
 ter was white, lacked flavor, and the grain more inclined to be salvy : 
 it was poor stuff. After a few da}'s we added two quarts of meal, 
 with roots (yellow cord beets) at noon. The quantity of milk was 
 somewhat increased, but not as much as I expected it would be. On 
 opening the silo, Nov. 12, we began feeding ensilage twice a da}', 
 morning and night. The fourth day the quantity of milk was nearly 
 double : as to the butter, it was nearly equal in flavor and color to 
 that made in summer from grass. We send it to our regular custom- 
 ers without a particle of coloring. We continued feeding in this way 
 for five or six weeks with the same pleasing results. When, in order 
 to dispose of our coarse fodder, we substituted corn-stalks and bar- 
 ley-straw for the morning feeding of ensilage, the change in the 
 amount of milk and butter was very marked, shrinking about quarter: 
 the color was considerable lighter. Hoping to make up for this 
 deficiency, we added two quarts of corn-meal per head to the ration 
 of dry fodder ; but it did not fully compensate for the feeding of 
 ensilage in the quality and color of the butter, while the amount was 
 increased to about the same as from the two feedings of ensilage. 
 
 We have now been feeding ensilage for three months to milch cows, 
 colts, young cattle, and sheep, at the rate of forty bushels per day. 
 The one hundred and sixty tons is about half gone, requiring less 
 than three acres to keep eighty head, fifty-five of which are long-wool 
 sheep ; total, equivalent to thirty-five head of cattle. 
 
 The following is the table of cost of five and one-half acres of 
 ensilage fodder or one hundred and sixty tons : 
 
102 
 
 H. B. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 HARVESTING, CUTTING, PACKING, AND PRESSING. 
 
 Total. 
 
 Pei- 
 Acre. 
 
 Per 
 Ton. 
 
 Eight hands, $1.00 per clay, four days .... 
 
 $32 00 
 
 
 
 Engine and engineer, $4.00 per day .... 
 
 16 00 
 
 
 
 Fuel for engine, $1.20 per day ..... 
 
 4 80 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 "Total cost of labor to secure 160 tons ensilage . 
 Cost of seed, filling ground, and cultivating 
 
 $52 80 
 27 50 
 
 $9 60 
 5 00 
 
 .33 
 .17 
 
 Total cost 
 
 $80 30 
 
 $14 60 
 
 .50 
 
 This does not include use of building and tools. I feel sure that I 
 can do the work for less another season. I cannot speak too highly 
 of the reaper that we used to cut the fodder, a " D. M. Osborn, No. 
 3," manufactured at Auburn, N.Y. It did the work in a most satis- 
 factor} r manner without a break. The corn had attained an enormous 
 growth, from nine to ten feet high, cutting two rows at a time, throw- 
 ing off bundles with every other rake. 
 
 It is also needless to add that I am well pleased with my first trial, 
 and expect to ensilage more next fall. 
 
 Yours respectfully, 
 
 F. S. PEER. 
 
 CHAPTER XXV. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 :M::R,. -w. a. 
 
 NONANTUM HILL NURSERY, BRIGHTON, MASS., FEB. 22, 1881. 
 
 MR. H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 Dear Sir: 
 
 My experiments with ensilage were limited to Hungarian grass 
 during the season of 1880. Noticing the statements of Dr. Faxon, 
 in regard to his success with grass cut veiy early in the season, and 
 in a succulent state, packed away without passing through the 
 cutter, I made inquiries of him and of Dr. Bailey and others as to 
 
CORRESPONDENCE OF W. C. STRONG. 103 
 
 the probable result of putting down Hungarian in a silo without 
 cutting. It w r as the opinion of all, that, if carefully done, it would 
 keep. Wishing to avoid the expense of a cutter and steam-power, 
 I determined to venture a trial. 1 filled a silo, twenty feet by twenty 
 feet and ten feet deep, with perfectly clean Hungarian, when in just 
 the condition to cut for hay, spreading it evenly, and treading with 
 great care, filling about two feet in depth daily. When finished, it 
 was covered, and weighted after the most approved manner. The 
 result is, that I am now carting the contents of the silo to the manure- 
 heaps, to work in as compost. It is now plain to see, that, notwith- 
 standing the thorough treading and weighting, enough oxygen would 
 remain in the stems and small spaces to keep up the fermentation 
 until the ensilage was ruined. Of course, every one is now wise 
 enough to see that I ought to have known better than to make the 
 trial ; but I can comfort myself with the credit of a voluntary mar- 
 tyrdom for the public good. 
 
 This first experiment was at my house-farm in Newton ; but I 
 also had a twelve-acre lot in Brighton sowed with this seed, and 
 designed for ha}*. Immediately after sowing, the weather was hot 
 and dry ; which checked the seed in starting, but developed a prodi- 
 gious crop of rag-weed (Ambrosia artemisice folia) . As a conse- 
 quence, the grass was largely choked out, the enormous growth being 
 at least sixty per cent of weeds. What to do with this burden, was 
 the question. Having a deeper-seated water-tank and also a good 
 engine, all at hand, I had only to buy a Baldwin cutter, and at little 
 expense I could determine what the new process would do for 
 weeds. Of course we cut them fine, and a man on horseback 
 packed them down solid. We averaged about two feet in depth per 
 da}', and somewhat over one hundred tons within the week of cut- 
 ting. The heat was so well driven out as the work proceeded, that 
 there was not much doubt that the stuff would keep. Its value was 
 another question, which could only be answered by trial. If you say 
 it is unreasonable to expect to take out any better than 3*011 put in, 
 I will simply give facts in reply. Having no cattle to feed, I sold 
 the ensilage to a milkman at six dollars per ton ; he doing the cart- 
 ing for a distance of four miles, and paying the weigh fees. As the 
 feed is dripping wet, it weighs well, and turns out to be worth a good 
 de:^l more than if it had been pure Hungarian and had been made 
 into hay. The very strange thing is this : that the cows are wild to 
 get the fodder, lick up the last vestige of it, give a good flow of 
 
104 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 excellent milk, and seem to be in excellent condition. The cows are 
 emphatic in their agreement with their owner and myself, that the 
 food is better than when it went in. It will keep several da} T s with- 
 out injury after taking it out, and is considered b}~ the purchaser to 
 be the cheapest food he can give his cows. Of course, it is a little 
 mortifying to make public my first failure, and second quasi-success ; 
 but it is only by these various trials that we can determine the true 
 value of this new process. With corn as the material, and a fine 
 cut and solid pack to follow, the result need not in any case be 
 doubtful. That Hungarian will keep perfectly when cut, I have no 
 doubt ; neither do I doubt its high value for fodder ; but, of course, 
 it will not }deld any thing like the weight per acre that can be ob- 
 tained from corn. Taking into consideration the enormous yield 
 which can be expected, the ease and certainty in harvesting in an}^ 
 weather, the great economy in stowage, the ease with which the 
 fodder can be taken out and distributed, and, last and chiefest, the 
 high value which this succulent food possesses, taking these and 
 other minor advantages into account, it is safe to predict a new era 
 in agriculture, destined to produce changes which no one can fore- 
 tell. The importance of the subject cannot be over-estimated ; and, 
 if you can throw light upon it, 3*ou will be a public benefactor. 
 
 Yours very truly, 
 
 W. C. STRONG. 
 
 CHAPTER XXVI. 
 
 REPORT FROM 
 
 NASHUA, N.H. 
 
 LAST summer Hon. Charles Williams built a silo, and filled it with 
 green corn-fodder. The silo is twenty feet long, nine feet wide, and 
 thirteen feet deep, and will hold about fifty-eight tons. It is built of 
 cement and stone, the interior sides being perfectly smooth and per- 
 
REPORT OF DR. W. H. TANNER. 105 
 
 pendicular, and cost about a hundred and forty- four dollars, besides 
 the labor of excavation. The silo was filled last summer by Mr. 
 Williams, with green corn- fodder cut into pieces about half an inch 
 long. It was covered over with close-fitting plank nine feet long, and 
 weighted down with pig-iron. Mr. Williams did not use any straw 
 on top or under the planks. He used a Daniels cutter made at Wood- 
 stock, Vt. , to chop up the feed ; the cutter being operated in the 
 building over the silo, and the power communicated by a belt from 
 his engine. 
 
 Mr. Williams began to feed from his silo on the 1st of November 
 last. The ensilage was found to be slightly acid, and alcoholic fer- 
 mentation had taken place to a certain extent. His horses showed no 
 great liking for it, but would eat it readily when mixed with meal. 
 His cows took to it with great relish, and immediately began to 
 increase their milk, which he claims was improved in quality as well 
 as quantity. In addition to the ensilage, the cows were fed about six 
 quarts of shorts a day throughout November, and grew fat, and 
 looked neatly. For hogs and poultry Mr. Williams thinks this kind 
 of fodder is unsurpassed ; and for milch cows he regards it far better 
 than any crop of roots or corn, both of which he has tried. The 
 ensilage settled about two feet. 
 
 CHAPTER XXVII. 
 
 REPORT OF 
 
 XDIR,. "VST. HI. 
 
 AMENIA, DUTCHESS CO., N.Y. 
 
 DR. TANNER built his silo thirty-five feet long, fifteen feet wide, 
 twenty feet deep. There were twelve acres of corn sowed for ensi- 
 lage, of the horse-tooth variety. His silo is placed against the barn. 
 The barn is large and well-equipped, broad stalls for about seventy 
 cows. The silo was filled within three feet of the top. The ensilage 
 
106 H. K. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 settled about three feet. When the silo was opened, the ensilage was in 
 a perfect state of preservation ; and his success in feeding cattle, and 
 the increased quantity of milk, is the same as others, and very pleasing 
 to the doctor. He will build more stables another year, keep more 
 cattle, and make more room for ensilage. As the doctor says, "Ensi- 
 lage with me is a success in every particular. The more I feed, the 
 more I am pleased. It is only a question of a little time about farmers 
 all building silos. They must do so, or starve. I am feeding a hun- 
 dred cows two feeds a day, with the best results." 
 
 CHAPTER XXVIII. 
 
 TH:O:M:.A_S, 
 
 OF VERMONT, 
 
 Says he raised several acres of corn the past season, and built a silo 
 of stone, forty feet in length, fifteen feet wide, and the same in 
 height. The walls were heavy, and laid in cement : the bottom and 
 sides were plastered with cement also. He commenced in September 
 to cut up the fodder with a Baldwin No. 18 fodder-cutter, which 
 makes it very fine, driven with horse-power. Thinks he could cut, 
 and put in the silo, cheaper than to bind in the field, and, when dry, 
 draw to the barn. This fodder kept finely, and was liked by all his 
 stock, including the pigs. He is sanguine he can raise corn and beef 
 cheaper than it can be produced at the West, and brought here ; 
 thinks two tons of the ensilage will be worth one of hay ; is satisfied 
 that this preserved fodder will keep the year around ; would raise 
 two crops on the land if possible, one of winter rye, and one of 
 corn, and ensilage both ; believes, if well kept, as good milk will 
 be obtained in winter as in summer, if some grain is fed in connec- 
 tion. He prefers cotton-seed meal for this purpose. Such a silo as 
 he built would not cost two hundred dollars. Feeds about fifty 
 pounds of this to a cow, a day. 
 
REPORT OF HON. J. B. BODWELL. 107 
 
 CHAPTER XXIX. 
 
 REPORT FROM 
 
 HOIST. J\ IB. 
 
 PINE GKOVE FARM, HALLOWELL, ME. 
 
 WE visited Pine Grove Farm, Hallowell, to examine the ensilage 
 now being taken from Mr. Boclwell's silo. About sixty-five tons of 
 corn-fodder were put into this silo last summer, and all the rules laid 
 down by those who had experimented with it carefully observed. 
 Nearly half of this amount has already been fed out, and a daily feed 
 is now given to each of the cattle and sheep. They eat it well, and 
 thrive upon it. When this food was first given, the daily feed of 
 corn-meal was reduced one quart, and this has been followed since ; 
 and the cattle thrive better than with the full feed of corn-meal. Mr. 
 Bodwell, by his experiment, has settled three points in his own mind 
 with regard to the ensilage of green fodder: viz., that the fodder cap 
 be preserved in the silo, that cattle and other animals eat it with ap- 
 parent relish, and that they thrive upon it. He noticed in the milch 
 cows a marked increase in the flow of milk soon after the feeding of 
 ensilage was commenced. Mr. Bodwell has preferred to build a silo 
 that will last for all time. A temporary silo, one that will answer for 
 a season or two, can be very cheaply built. 
 
108 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER XXX. 
 
 REPORT OF 
 
 - E. ID. 
 FITCHBURG, MASS. 
 
 LAST year I planted about an acre, and ensilaged it in August. I 
 procured a Baldwin cutter, which cut fodder seven-eighths of an inch 
 long, and put in about twenty-five tons. I covered the fodder with 
 straw, and then with plank, and weighted it with stones. A few days 
 later a slight odor was perceptible, which continued four or five weeks. 
 I took out a specimen at cattle-show, found it keeping well. I com- 
 menced feeding, the 2d of December, and have enough to last till 
 March. Cattle do very well on it ; better than on hay. The ensilage 
 should be put in hard. Stone and cement should be used in con- 
 structing silos. The walls should be sixteen inches thick. I am 
 intending to put in ensilage enough to fill my barn with cattle. I can 
 raise ensilage at two dollars per ton. I would build the silo under 
 my barn if convenient. I think ensilage will take the front rank as 
 feed. I have made a failure of curing corn-fodder, and feeding it to 
 stock. My cattle did not eat ensilage readily at first, but in a few 
 days some of my cows would leave hay and rowen to eat ensilage. 
 If I had a supply, I would feed seven-eighths ensilage, and would 
 prefer all ensilage to all hay. Clover, Hungarian, and other grasses 
 can be used for ensilage, but I should not ensilage good English hay. 
 I took a piece of grass-land, ploughed it, put on twelve loads of 
 manure and half a barrel of phosphate, and sowed corn in rows. It 
 grew so fast, and shaded the ground so, I was not troubled with 
 weeds ; did not touch the crop till I harvested it. I should sow the 
 seed five or six inches apart, let it grow as large as it will ; should 
 sow from first of June till July ; the early part of July is early enough 
 if the land is rich. 
 
REPORT FROM COL. R. H. DULANEY. 109 
 
 CHAPTER XXXI. 
 
 REPORT FROM 
 
 COL. &,. HI. 
 
 OF LOUDOUN COUNTY, MARYLAND. 
 (FROM SOUTHERN PLANTER AND FARMER.) 
 
 I PREPARED fifteen acres of sod-land, by top-dressing it with all the 
 manure from the cellar of my cattle-barn, where I had fed eighty-two 
 cattle and twelve horses four hundred and fifty barrels of corn, 
 besides their long food, during the winter. After the land was 
 ploughed, and thoroughly harrowed and rolled, I drilled in three 
 bushels of corn and four hundred pounds of bone to the acre. By 
 stopping alternate tubes of the drill, the rows were eighteen inches 
 apart, and there were from eight to twelve to the foot in the row. I 
 had intended to plough this crop three times ; but after one ploughing 
 with single-shovel plough there came several hours of rain, after which 
 the corn grew so rapidly that it soon met across the row, and could 
 not be ploughed again. I dug a pit seventy-eight feet long, twenty 
 feet wide, and twelve feet deep, and lined it with a two-foot stone 
 wall, which was continued for three feet above the ground, and 
 cemented the sides and bottom. 
 
 I should have cut the corn, which was the heaviest I ever saw, as 
 soon as the ears began to form ; but had to wait until I finished the 
 pit. 
 
 When I commenced, some of the corn was too old for roasting- 
 ears, and the blades near the ground had lost their green color. The 
 field was four hundred yards from the pit. It required three and 
 sometimes four first-rate hands to cut the corn ; two ox-carts and 
 one four-horse wagon, with an extra hand to assist the drivers to 
 load, to haul the corn, which was being cut up into five-eighth-inch 
 pieces, by two eighteen-inch cutting-boxes. It required one man at 
 each box to feed, and two men to keep each supplied with the 
 fodder. 
 
110 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 The boxes were at the side, equally distant from each end of the 
 pit, and driven by an eight-horse engine. The ensilage was kept 
 equally distributed over the floor, and six large farm-horses were 
 ridden over it from ten to twelve, and from five to seven o'clock, to 
 pack it. As the horses could not pack that against the walls, and at 
 the angles at the ends, that had to be trodden down by the men, when 
 the engine was stopped. 
 
 We were fourteen days with fourteen men in filling the pit to within 
 three feet of the top. I then ran enough straw through the cutting- 
 box to cover the whole mass three inches deep ; then covered with 
 two-inch boards laid across the pit, and the boards with stone two 
 feet deep. 
 
 On the 10th of January I opened the pit by taking off six feet of 
 stone and plank. When I saw the straw black and rotten, I feared 
 that the prophecy of my neighbors, "that I would have an immense 
 quantity of rotten fodder to haul out in the spring," had been fulfilled. 
 But, on getting to the fodder, I found only an inch deep a little 
 moulded, and all the rest, except in the angles of the building, and 
 against a part of the wall (from which the cement had fallen), in 
 perfect order. Eighty-two cattle are eating with great relish thirty- 
 seven pounds each day, and two hundred ewes one and a half pounds 
 each. 
 
 I have now fed for three weeks, and have only used about one-sixth 
 of the ensilage. At this rate it will keep my cattle and sheep until 
 April 20, at which time I usually turn on grass. From a flock of 
 one hundred sheep t*t have been fed on ensilage since the pit was 
 opened, I have lost but one ; whilst from two hundred and fifty fed 
 on corn, straw, and fodder, I lost thirty in two weeks. These ewes 
 were heavy with lambs, and the change from grass to entirely dry 
 food caused constipation, and that, inflammation, which caused their 
 death. For the last week I have been feeding most of my sheep on 
 ensilage ; and, except some that were sick when I commenced, I have 
 lost none. 
 
 The fifteen acres of ensilaged corn would have fed eighty cattle 
 one hundred and twenty-five clays, the usual length of our winter, 
 with the addition of one gallon of corn a day to each steer. If 
 fifty cubic feet make a ton, then I had two hundred and eighty-three 
 tons, which cost to cut, haul, and pack away, two hundred dollars, 
 less than one dollar a ton. 
 
THE VALUE OF GREEN FORAGE CROPS. Ill 
 
 CHAPTER XXXII. 
 
 :M:.A.:D.A.:M::E] 
 
 THE WELL-KNOWN TEACHER AND SINGER, 
 
 says, "I am well pleased with the result of my little silo. All my 
 cattle eat ensilage with great relish, leaving good English hay for the 
 ensilage maize. The quality and quantity of milk have improved 
 since the cows have been fed on ensilage." 
 
 CHAPTER XXXIIL 
 
 IE. 
 
 AN EXTENSIVE FARMER OF BERKSHIRE COUNTY, 
 
 says, "I have never seen a cow eat the best of hay when offered 
 ensilage : it is always ensilage first, and hay afterward. It is the 
 most profitable investment I ever made, and there is no reason why 
 thousands of farmers may not make it as profitable as I have." 
 
 CHAPTER XXXIV. 
 
 THE FEEDING OF STOCK. 
 
 EACH and every farmer has his own mind and way of feeding stock 
 upon the farm. Some feed with hay and shorts, some with hay and 
 corn-meal ; some hay, meal, and shorts ; and others hay, roots, and 
 
112 H. E. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 grains, etc. Have you ever tried the cutting of the dry fodder by 
 running through a fodder- cutter, cutting it into short pieces ? Wet 
 the dry fodder enough to moisten, take enough for one day's feed, 
 mix this evenly with the kind and quantity of grain you use, and 
 feed ; if it stands several hours before feeding, your cattle will like 
 it all the better. By this way of feeding you will save fifteen per 
 cent of dry fodder, and those who have tried it say a larger per cent. 
 If you are feeding on ensilage in part, and wish part dry fodder, cut 
 in short pieces, mix ensilage, cut fodder, and required quantity of 
 grain ; this makes a good feed. Sixty pounds ensilage from corn- 
 fodder, or forty-five pounds of clover ensilaged, is good feed for one 
 cow per day. This quantity is a fair average. These quantities will 
 keep a cow in good condition, with an increased flow of milk, with 
 better health than when fed on hay. With six quarts shorts and 
 sixty pounds of ensilage per day, your cows will gain flesh, and do 
 better than when fed on ensilage alone ; add to this feed one quart 
 of corn-meal, you get a good feed ; and I think this quantity of 
 grain with ensilage is not only the most economical, but is better for 
 cows than to feed a larger quantity. To fatten cattle, sixty pounds 
 ensilage (more or less as they eat up clean) , with four pounds corn- 
 meal per day, will rapidly fatten them. I believe corn-fodder ensi- 
 lage fed with clover, rowen, or any of our grasses ensilaged, is a 
 better and more natural food for our stock than the corn ensilage 
 alone. 
 
 CHAPTER XXXV. 
 
 r 
 
 ENSILAGE FOR POULTRY. 
 
 THE feeding of ensilage to poultry is eaten and relished as well as 
 when fed to horses, cows, and pigs, and, by various experiments, has 
 proved to be as nutritious for poultry as for cows. When ensilage is 
 fed to poultry they not only eat it greedily, but it makes them smart 
 and active : have a healthy look and a fine bright plumage, which is a 
 sure indication of good health. During the winter season ensilage, 
 when fed to poultry, mixing with it a proportional part of shorts or 
 corn-meal, will increase the laying of eggs, and fatten them very 
 
ENSILAGE FOR POULTRY. 113 
 
 readily. As ensilage and corn-meal fatten cattle, so with poultry 
 they lay on fat very readily. 
 
 Experiments tried prove that poultry fed on ensilage, with a suffi- 
 cient quantity of grain, will do better in every particular than when 
 fed in the old way upon grains, at one-fourth the cost, or at a saving 
 of about seventy-five per cent. One hundred fowls, take them as 
 they run, large and small, will cost, to feed them one year, about one 
 hundred dollars. To feed the same on ensilage and the required 
 qiuintlty of grain would cost not to exceed twenty-five dollars. Ensi- 
 lage alone is self-sustaining : the poultry will do well and lay well. 
 To feed on ensilage alone would cost about fourteen dollars ; and to 
 add to this shorts, corn-meal, buckwheat mixed with the ensilage, 
 occasionally scraps, plenty of gravel, ashes, etc., they will do better 
 than by any known way of feeding. One hundred fowls should pro- 
 duce, at a low estimate, eight hundred and thirty-three dozen eggs 
 in one year, besides laying eggs to set about thirty hens. These 
 eight hundred and thirty-three dozen eggs at twenty cents per dozen 
 would equal $166.60, and, by fair success, should raise a hundred 
 and fifty chickens. The reason I discuss this subject, poultry, is to 
 show that hundreds of mechanics, laborers, etc., who are owners of 
 a small house, with an acre or two of land, by properly preparing an 
 acre of land, and planting it to corn for ensilage, can raise twenty- 
 five tons to the acre ; average cost would be about two dollars per 
 ton in the silo ; can build a small silo, not to cost over twenty-five 
 to forty dollars, and less than that if they can do the work them- 
 selves ; fill this silo with the ensilage. You can keep a cow the year 
 round on ten to twelve tons of ensilage, or, if fed with some hay or 
 grain, less ensilage. With the balance of the twenty-five tons you 
 can keep from a hundred and fifty to two hundred fowls. Turkeys, 
 geese, and ducks are greedy for ensilage. 
 
 Practical experiments prove these results ; and, for a small invest- 
 ment, I know of no investment that will surely bring such good 
 results. 
 
114 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CHAPTER XXXVI. 
 
 CORRESPONDENCE FROM 
 
 IPIROIFIESSOIR, 0". IMI. 
 
 KNOXVILLE, TENN., FEB. 12, 1881 
 
 DEAR SIR. 
 
 I send you the results of my first month's experiments in feeding. 
 I regret those with the milch cows are not yet determined. I think 
 the results speak well for the new food. 
 
 The first set (I.) will be continued this month, and I think with 
 better results, as all the loss occurred in the first part, during the 
 change from dry to green food. Notwithstanding the loss of weight, 
 the animals are sleek and healthy looking, and with hearty appetites. 
 This month I am allowing them as much as they w r ill eat of 
 ensilage. 
 
 Sets 4 and 5 were not only designed to test the relative values of 
 hay (good timothy and clover mixed) and ensilage, but also those 
 of corn, cotton seed, and rice-corn meal. This rice, or Egyptian 
 corn, is the cereal attracting so much attention in Kansas. It is 
 really the Dhoura, a variety of Sorghum vulgare. The animal fed 
 on it in Set 4, No. 2, gave the best results of any in the set ; No. 
 10, in Set 5, the worst in its set (5). 
 
 All kinds of stock are exceedingly fond of it ; and I have no hesi- 
 tation, not only from these experiments, but from my general expe- 
 rience with it, in pronouncing it fully equal in feeding value to 
 Indian corn. 
 
EXPERIMENTS IN CATTLE-FEEDING. 
 
 115 
 
 ' - 
 
 ^ ' !Tt * 
 
 SSJ 
 
 O *H ^ C2 , i 
 
 ^ $ '> "g ^ i 1 1 if 2 
 
 ~ P 1 "5 S> I 
 
 ^5>-rc-a > 
 
 i!i!=i ! 
 
 COt^ COCOCO O5C<JCO UOt^O CCC<li-H 
 
 03^1 oioo co t- o i^-oio c^io'o 
 
 OCNCO CO CO 8 <= ^ O ^. ^ ^ ^ OCO^-H 
 
 OOO* OrHX o'rHi-H CNrHt-H OCNCN 
 
 O O O 
 <N rf CO 
 
 O O I O O O t JO O O OOO t O O 
 
 g O O O 1 C^^CO (MO5CO O'-H'* OOO 
 
 jt"*COC5CO 1 O O OO^Jl COOSt- O t t- 
 
 . t >O 
 
 gOD 'N 
 -0 CO 
 
 O 
 
 CO 
 
 o o o o o 
 
 o o o ~*o o 
 
 O Tf 00 CO t- 
 
 v. 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 c 
 
 60 fcO 
 
 c3 c^ 
 
 1 1 
 
 Jfcj 
 
 . <D 
 
 a fee 
 
 - 5'5'iT-a 
 
 ^3 
 
 cS ^ 
 
 B-- 
 
 S o o 
 
 2 J^^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 s 
 
 o *-* 
 
 ^ rj< iO O 
 
 s i s i 4 MM* ^ J ' 
 
 ^^ ^^^^ OOSD~~ 
 
 000 000 pp- 
 
 OS O CO 
 
 t- (M CO 
 
116 H. R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 Animals used in experiments, the stock ones of farm. Ages in 
 last four sets varying from one to three years ; also some difference 
 in blood, majority short-horn or Devon grades. In Set 1, animals 
 stabled all the time, all others allowed to run out during day. No. 
 14 greatly in favor of ensilage, as showing its milk-producing quali- 
 ties : cow not only came back to her milk, but gave a good flow during 
 its continuance. Bull No. 16 was an animal singularly savage and 
 unprofitable ; we have been anxious to get rid of him for some time. 
 With these allowances, and the further facts, that, for the first week, 
 the animals ate the ensilage freely, but not as greedily as afterwards ; 
 that they were (as will always be the case in changing from dry to 
 green food) scoured for three or four days ; that the month was the 
 coldest ever known, and that all the loss was in the first ten days ; 
 that No. 9 virtually held her own, the experiments even of this set 
 are favorable to ensilage. Still if one wishes to do more- than 
 merely "maintain" his animals, the ensilage must be enriched (as 
 I hold) by albuminous food. Hence, if due allowance be made for 
 previous treatment of Nos. 1 and 4, Set II. gave better results, as 
 these two animals did not eat more than one-half of the rations 
 allowed them. In Set III., Nos. 12 and 13 more than doubled 
 No. 7 ; the difference in favor of this set over II. showing the 
 value of albuminous matters. Set V. compared with IV. again gives 
 results decidedly in favor of ensilage ; No. 8 more than doubling- 
 No. 3, and No. 11, No. 5. No. 10 was a grade Devon; No. 2 a 
 grade short-horn ; hence the latter had the advantage of blood. The 
 results on the whole are very favorable to ensilage. 
 
 Wishing abundant success to your new work, I am 
 Yours respectfully, 
 
 J M. M'BRYDE. 
 
 CHAPTEE XXXVII. 
 
 FROM CHARLES L. FLINTS BOOK ON GRASSES AND FORAGE-PLANTS 
 (A VALUABLE AND INSTRUCTIVE WORK), 
 
 RED CLOVER ( Trifolium pratense) , though not included in the family 
 of grasses, is not only extensively cultivated, but is found to be one 
 of the most valuable and economical forage-plants. It belongs to 
 
GRASSES AND FORAGE-PLANTS. 
 
 117 
 
 the pulse-family, or Leguminosae, which includes the larger portion 
 of forage-plants called "artificial grasses," in distinction from the 
 Gramineae, the only true, and often called the "natural," grasses. 
 The generic name trefoil, or trifolium, is derived from the Latin 
 " tres" (three) and "folium" (a leaf) ; and the genus can be very 
 readily distinguished by the number and arrangement of its leaves in 
 three leaflets, and flowers in dense oblong or globular heads. 
 
 The stems of red clover are ascending, somewhat hairy ; leaflets oval 
 or obovate, often notched at the end, and marked on the upper side 
 with a pale spot ; heads ovate, and set directly upon the stalk, instead 
 of upon branches. This species is regarded as by far the most im- 
 portant of the whole genus for the practical purposes of agriculture. 
 It has passed into a number of varieties, one of which is biennial, 
 another perennial ; the latter by long cultivation 
 becoming biennial, while the former, as is true 
 of most biennial and many annual plants, as- 
 sumes, to some extent, the character of a peren- 
 nial, and can be made to last three or four 
 years, or even more, by simply preventing it 
 from running to seed. The introduction of 
 clover into England, it is often said, produced 
 an entire revolution in her agriculture ; and, 
 indeed, when we consider how important a part 
 it plays in our system of farming, we can with 
 difficulty imagine how our ancestors ever got 
 on at all in farming without it. Be this as it 
 may, it is certain that it led to many of the 
 most important improvements in the rotation of crops. Clover is 
 very properly regarded as a fertilizer of the soil. The action of 
 its long and powerful tap-roots is not only mechanical, loosening 
 the soil, and admitting the air, but also chemical, serving to fix 
 the gases important to enrich the earth ; and when these roots 
 decay, they add largely to that black mass of matter we call soil. Jt 
 serves also, by its luxuriant foliage, to destroy annual weeds which 
 would spring up on newly-seeded land, especially after imperfect cul- 
 tivation. But one of the most valuable uses of it, and one too often 
 overlooked, is to shade the surface of the soil, and thereby increase 
 its fertility. 
 
 Another great advantage in favor of the cultivation of clover con- 
 sists in its rapid growth. But a few months elapse from the sowing 
 
 RED CLOVER. 
 
118 
 
 H R. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 of the seed before it yields, ordinarily, an abundant and nutritious 
 crop relished by cattle of all kinds. 
 
 Clover-seed should always be sown in the spring of the year in the 
 
 climate of New England. It is often 
 sown upon the late snows of March 
 or April, and soon finds its way down 
 to the soil, where, aided by the moist- 
 ure of early spring, it quickly germi- 
 nates, and rapidly shoots up its leaf- 
 stalks. 
 
 Hungarian grass, Hungarian millet 
 (Panicum Germanicum) , has been 
 cultivated to con- 
 siderable extent in 
 this country from 
 seed received 
 from France 
 through the 
 United-States 
 Patent Office. 
 
 It is an annual 
 forage plant, in- 
 troduced into 
 France in 1815, 
 where its cultiva- 
 tion has become 
 considerably ex- 
 tended. It ger- 
 minates readily, 
 withstands the 
 
 drought remarkably, remaining green even when 
 other vegetation is parched up ; and, if its devel- 
 opment is arrested by dry weather, the least rain 
 will restore it to vigor. It has numerous succu- 
 lent leaves, which furnish an abundance of green 
 fodder, very much relished by all kinds of stock. 
 It flourishes in somewhat light and dry soils, 
 though it attains its greatest luxuriance in soils 
 of medium consistency, and well manured. It may be sown broad- 
 cast, and cultivated precisely like the varieties of millet. This grass 
 
 HUNGARIAN GRASS. 
 
 COMMON MILLET. 
 
GRASSES AND FORAGE-PLANTS. 119 
 
 is thought to contain a somewhat higher percentage of nutriment 
 than the common millet, though I am not aware that it has been 
 analyzed. It is a leafy plant, and remains green until its seed ma- 
 tures, and is no doubt valuable for fodder, both green and dry, growing 
 and maturing in about the same time as common millet. From twenty- 
 five to thirty bushels of seed to the acre have been obtained. 
 
 Common millet (Panicum miliaceum), flowers in large, open, 
 nodding panicles ; leaves lance-shaped, broad ; stem one to two feet 
 high ; native of Turkey. 
 
 Many varieties of millet have at times been cultivated in this 
 country, and its culture is gaining favor every year. Millet is one 
 of the best crops we have for cutting and feeding green for soiling 
 purposes, since its yield is large, its luxuriant leaves juicy and tender, 
 and much relished by milch cows and other stock. Cut in the 
 blossom, as it should be for feeding to cattle, the seed is compara- 
 tively valueless. If allowed to ripen its seed, the stalk is no more 
 nutritious, probably, than oat-straw. 
 
 Millet requires good soil, and is rather an exhausting crop, but 
 yields a produce valuable in proportion to the richness of the soil, 
 and care and expense of cultivation. 
 
 CHAPTER XXXVIII. 
 
 PREMIUMS OFFERED BY H. R. STEVENS. 
 
 I WILL give to the party who raises the greatest number of tons of 
 fodder-corn per acre, not less than one acre, from seed planted 
 called Blnnt's Prolific, one hundred dollars in cash ; to the party 
 who raises the next in quantity, fifty dollars in cash ; to the party 
 who raises the next in quantity, twenty-five dollars in cash, 
 making three premiums. First, one hundred dollars ; second, fifty 
 dollars ; third, twenty- five dollars. 
 
 The kind of corn planted to compete for these premiums must be 
 " Blunt's Prolific." These premiums are offered to any or all 
 parties in the New England States. Mr. J. J. H. Gregory, the seed 
 man of the United States, says, " there is no better corn to plant for 
 fodder- corn than Blunt* s Prolific." Blank certificates, with conditions 
 to compete for the three premiums offered by me, will be furnished 
 upon application. Address, 
 
 H, R, STEVENS, 
 
 Boston, Mass 
 
120 H. JS. STEVENS ON ENSILAGE. 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 
 IN conclusion, I think the reader will say I have given in this work 
 all I promised in the introduction, the practical experience of practi- 
 cal farmers with silos and ensilage, and I have reason to believe it is 
 the practical information the farmers want, that will give practical 
 results with profit for their labor. Is there any doubt of the success 
 of preserving our green forage crops by ensilage? There is no 
 doubt ! Then I think I have shown the success is a profitable one. 
 When the farmer with one silo to-day says, " I must build larger, 
 I must have two or three additional silos the coming year," it is 
 practical proof that it is a success, and a profitable one. Farmers 
 are not apt to be very enthusiastic over their labors unless there are 
 some profits. I must say I have never seen so much enthusiasm 
 shown as expressed by those who have built silos for ensilage. 
 When a farmer says, " I have saved more money the past year than 
 I have for twenty years," it does seem as though the golden harvest 
 is to be reaped by the farmer ; and, for one, I think it is the farmer's 
 turn to meet with this success. Who can foretell the results when, 
 in less than five years, there will be thousands of silos in the United 
 States, whereas to-day there are about forty-three? Does it not 
 seem as though a new interest was awakening among our New-Eng- 
 land farmers? Has not the time arrived when our deserted farms 
 will all be wanted, and will be cultivated? Is there not a bonanza in 
 the farms with this new enterprise ? Will it not give the farmer such 
 profits, with less labor, as will enable him to be more independent? 
 Is it not going to create new interest with our sons when they can 
 find a more profitable employment, with less hard labor, than can be 
 found in any business in our cities? This enterprise will create a 
 new interest in farming : it will increase our stock in such large 
 numbers, our farms will be enriched, the soil more productive, crops 
 increased ; and with the great labor-saving, improved, agricultural 
 implements, instead of millions of New-England money going West 
 to purchase grain for our farmers, with our enriched farms, we 
 should raise all the grain we consume on the farm. 
 
 Again, with the increase in stock, the increase in productions of 
 beef, butter, cheese, wool, in quality, as well as quantity. With 
 these results, instead of our New-England towns decreasing in popu- 
 lation, they must double their numbers. These results can be ob- 
 tained by the farmer from this new enterprise, the preserving of our 
 green forage crops by ensilage. 
 
THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW 
 
 RENEWED BOOKS ARE SUBJECT TO IMMEDIATE 
 RECALL 
 
 LIBRARY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 
 
 Book Slip-20m-8,'61(C1623s4)458 
 
2kl003 
 
 Stevens, H.R. 
 
 On ensilage of green 
 
 f^^^rr^ fr>r>r>fi in sllOS . 
 
 Call Number: 
 
 SB195 
 
 SB)35 
 575 
 
 241003