QP 
 
 UC-NRLF 
 
 C E T03 337 
 
 SEC0NB INTERIM REPORT 
 
 ON AK INVESTIGATION OF 
 
 INDUSTRIAL FATIGUE 
 
 Hi' 
 
 PHYSIOLOGICAL METHODS, 
 
 BY 
 
 A. F. STANLEY KENT, M.A., D.Sc. (OXON), 
 
 HENRY OVKHTUN WILLS PROFESSOR OF PHYSIOLOGY IX THI-: UNIVERSITY STOL. 
 
 f restntrt to both ouses of f&uiutment bn (Eommanb of |jts 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 FEINTED UND^Ii THE AUTHORITY OF HIS -MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 
 By DARLING AXD SON, LIMITED, BACON STREET, E. 
 
 To be purchased, either directly or through any Bookseller, from 
 WYMAN AND SONS, LIMITED, 29, BREAMS BUILDINGS. FETTER LANE, B.C., 
 
 28, AUINC;DO.\ ST-PEKT. S.W., and o4. ST. .MAUY STKKET, CARDIFF; or 
 H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE (SCOTTISH BRANCH). - Foimi STREET, EDINBURGH: or 
 
 E. PONSONBY. LIMITED, 110, GKAI-TUN STREET, DUBLIN: 
 or from the Agt'iicu/.N in the British Colonies and Dependencies, 
 the United States of America and other Foreign Countries of 
 T. FISHER UNWIN, LIMITED, LONDON, W.C. 
 
 fCd. 8335.] Price Is. Gd. 
 
 1916. 
 
BIO 
 
 UBRAKY 
 G 
 
HOME OFFICE. 
 
 SECOND INTERIM REPORT 
 
 ON AN INVESTIGATION OF 
 
 INDUSTRIAL FATIGUE 
 
 PHYSIOLOGICAL METHODS, 
 
 BY 
 
 A. F. STANLEY KENT, M.A., D.Sc. (OXON), 
 
 HENRY OVERTON WILLS PROFESSOR OK PHYSIOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL. 
 
 ffresentrt to both louses of fterltament tm Otommanb of i 
 
 LONDON: 
 
 PRINTED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 
 By DARLING AND SON, LIMITED, BACON STEEET, E. 
 
 To be purchased, either directly or through any Bookseller, from 
 WYMAN AND SONS, LIMITED, 29, BREAMS BUILDINGS, FETTER LANE, E.G.. 
 
 28, ABINGDON STREET, S.W., andi 54, ST. MARY STREET, CARDIFF; or 
 II. M. STATIONERY OFFICE (SCOTTISH BRANCH), 23, FORTH STREET, EDINBURGH; or 
 
 E. PONSONBY, LIMITED, 116, GRAFTON STREET, DUBLIN; 
 or froirf the Agencies in the British Colonies and Dependencies, 
 the United States of America and other Foreign Countries of 
 T. FISHER UNWIN. LIMITED, LONDON, W.C. 
 
 Cd. 8335.] Price Is. 6d, 
 
 1916. 
 
f OP4 
 
 OGY 
 u 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 INTRODUCTORY LETTER ... 3 
 
 LIST OP CHARTS 6 
 
 SECTION I. Fatigue as a result of Overtime 7 
 
 Summary ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 21 
 
 SECTION II. The Influence of Fatigue and of Overtime upon Output 23 
 
 Summary 43 
 
 SECTION III. Food and Feeding 44 
 
 Equilibrium and Balancing ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 4,s 
 
 The Attainment of Maximum Output ... ... ... ... ... ... 50 
 
 The Influence of Overtime upon the General Health of the Worker 60 
 
 APPENDIX A. Details of Individuals examined ... ... ... ... ... 66 
 
 B. Time actually worked in different Periods of the Day 72 
 
 INDEX ... 74 
 

 S KCONJ) INTEH 1 M H EPO LIT 
 
 OX ANT 1XYKSTHJATION OF 
 
 INI3 USTRI A L F ATIGTJ E 
 
 
 
 PH YSIOLOG ICAL METHODS, 
 
 BV 
 
 A. 1'. STANLKV KENT, M.A., D.Sc. (OXDN), 
 HENRY OVERTON WILLS PROFESSOR OF PHYSIOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL 
 
 BRISTOL, 
 
 16th August, 1916. 
 To 
 
 Sir Arthur Whitelegge, M.D., K.C.B., 
 
 H.M. Chief Inspector of Factories. 
 
 SIR, 
 
 The following pages contain some account of a continuation of former experi- 
 ments on industrial fatigue undertaken on behalf of the Home Office and described 
 in a previous Report.* 
 
 Seven factories in all have been visited. Investigations were carried on at one 
 of these for a period of three and a half months, shorter periods being devoted to 
 most of the others. Many of the results now presented were obtained during investi- 
 gations at Factories E and F. The first of these employed about 2,000 hands and was 
 engaged principally in the manufacture of surgical dressings for the army in the 
 field. The whole of the processes required to produce the finished article from raw 
 material are carried out in this mill, from the opening of the bales of cotton to the 
 packing of the completed dressings ready for dispatch to the front. These opera- 
 tions include, besides opening and packing, carding, spinning, winding, warping, 
 sizing, weaving, bleaching, drying, impregnating with antiseptic, re-drying, 
 examining, winding, cutting into bandages, weighing and compressing. 
 
 The second (Factory F) was an engineering works employing about 600 men, 
 besides many women, and engaged in the manufacture of war material, from turbines 
 for large ships to the steel shields used in the trenches. Male and female labour was 
 employed in both factories, and examples of both will be found in the results. 
 
 A special investigation was carried out in order to ascertain whether members 
 of the office staff suffered from undue fatigue. 
 
 It is, perhaps, unnecessary to emphasize the importance of any means which 
 is capable of giving reliable indications of the development of fatigue in munitions 
 factories, where it is desirable to secure maximum output, but where it is also 
 essential to conserve the health and energies of the workers. 
 
 In Section I. I would especially draw your attention to the progressive develop- 
 ment of fatiguet throughout the week, and to the concomitant diminution in the 
 power of recovery, to the development of extra fatigue as a result of overtime! 
 (Charts Nos. 3, 4. 5, 6A). to the disadvantage of working consecutive overtime 
 days (Charts Nos. 3, 4), to the development of fatigue during day and night shifts, 
 
 * Interim Report on an Investigation of Industrial Fatigue by Physiological Methods. August, 
 1915. [Cd. 8056, price %*.] 
 
 t For definition of " Fatigue," see p. 7. 
 
 J "Overtime" here means generally the hours 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. worked at the end of a day 
 commencing at 6 a.m. In Chart No. 5 the overtime was from tj p.m. to 8 p.m., or from 6 p.m. to 
 10 p.m. worked at the end of a day commencing at 8.30 a.m. 
 
 (73121.) Wt. 51714 343. 2000. 9/16. D & S. G 1. A 2 
 
 38733J 
 
with arguments for their less frequent reversal, to the process of ordinary recovery 
 from fatigue (Charts 4, 8, 9, 10), to recovery during rest intervals (Chart 7), and to 
 recovery complicated by illness (Curve 6 A). 
 
 In Section II. I would refer to the existence of periods of high and of low 
 output (Charts 11, 12, 13, 14), especially where overtime is worked, to the gradual 
 change in the period of lowest output as fatigue develops during the week (Charts 
 
 11, 12), to the fact that in Charts 13 and 14 overtime invariably produced the lowest 
 output, and that this may be traced to fatigue, to the inability of the workers to 
 respond efficiently to a call for extra overtime on Saturday, 4th December (Chart 12), 
 after a week's work, to the differences with regard to output between the Lint 
 Packers and the Boracic Lint Packers doing similar work but differing as regards 
 overtime (Charts Nos. 13, 14, 15, 16), to the evidence given on pp. 40, 43 that the work- 
 ing of overtime may lead, not to an increase, but to an actual diminution of output, to 
 the occasional appearance of special circumstances affecting the output of indi- 
 viduals (Chart No. 13, Worker No. 33, and Chart No. 14, Worker No. 35), and, 
 generally, to the important influence of home conditions upon the development of 
 fatigue and upon the consequent diminution of output. The value of rest intervals 
 also must be emphasized. 
 
 An interesting, though perhaps less important, matter is the curious condition 
 of lower efficiency exhibited by workers on Monday morning. 
 
 With reference to these phenomena it will be recognised that a 
 progressive diminution of the power of the worker to resist fatigue, 
 or to recover from it, if present, affords a strong argument against the 
 practice sometimes adopted of employing Sunday labour. For in normal times 
 the lessened efficiency found towards the end of the week is remedied by 
 the rest obtained on Saturday afternoon and Sunday, but where Sunday 
 labour is introduced, the rest is inadequate, and the condition of fatigue becomes 
 permanent. Even this is not the full extent of the evil, since the fatigue produced 
 by a full week's work, added to that already existing, will produce a condition at the 
 end of the second week worse than at its beginning. The process will continue from 
 week to week, until either the worker breaks down under the strain, or, a more 
 probable result, equilibrium is brought about. The manner in which such equili- 
 brium may be produced is described on page 48. In either case the result will 
 be disastrous from the point of view of output, and frequently from the point of 
 view of health also. 
 
 The case is very similar when daily overtime is considered, though, owing to 
 the interruption of work which the necessary experiments would entail, it has not 
 been shown directly that the power of recovery from fatigue becomes progressively 
 less during the day. It has nevertheless been proved that the output of workers 
 during the overtime period is far less than the output during the hours of normal 
 labour. And in my opinion the results of experiments indicate that this lessening 
 of output in the period of overtime is due to fatigue. 
 
 It should, perhaps, be pointed out that in factories where the output depends 
 almost entirely upon the number of hours the machinery can be kept running, and 
 the direct influence of the operatives is small, it may be desirable to preserve overtime, 
 though even here a better arrangement would be the introduction of a fresh shift, 
 
 The fact that certain workers who were placed under observation were found 
 to lose 25 per cent., 18 per cent., and 27 per cent, of their time in different periods 
 of the day is significant. This loss of time is a factor in the process referred to as 
 " balancing," and described in Section III. 
 
 Another point to which I would direct your attention is the practice which 
 exists amongst some individuals of going to their work in the early morning without 
 having taken food. Results bearing upon this point are shown in Charts 11, 
 
 12, 15, 16, where, of five workers, one who came breakfastless to the mill is shown 
 to be inferior as regards output during the early morning hours to the others who 
 had taken food; similar results were obtained in other experiments. Further details 
 with regard to food and feeding are given in Section III. 
 
 On pp. 50-60 some consideration is given to the means by which maximum out- 
 put may be obtained, whilst the influence of overtime upon the general health of the 
 worker is treated in the concluding pages. 
 
 The work has been in progress for some years. It is now occupying the whole 
 time of three investigators. Not only have the circumstances of labour been studied, 
 but also the home conditions of the workers, their general health, and other factors 
 which seem likely to influence their reaction to the present abnormal conditions. 
 
Ordinarily the tests commenced at 5.40 a.m., when night shifts were exam- 
 ined. At (J a.m. the h'rst examinations of the day shifts were made. At 8.30 
 the office staff and any late workers were tested. At 11.45 a.m. tests were carried 
 out upon workers whom it was desired to examine for recovery during the dinner 
 hour. At 1.30 p.m. the same workers were tested again. At 4.45 p.m. those 
 individuals working ordinary hours who would go off duty at 5.30 were examined, 
 together with those commencing a .night shift. At 7.30 p.m. the overtime workers 
 were tested, and at 9.35 p.m. those coming off at 10. Work was usually finished 
 shortly after 10 p.m. 
 
 The times given are those at which it was usually necessary to commence 
 the examination in order to ensure its completion before the hour of cessation of 
 labour, as, although greatly interested, and willing to give every assistance in the 
 inquiry, the workers naturally disliked being kept after hours. For this reason 
 it was necessary to commence the examination after the hour in the case of those 
 commencing work, and before the hour in the case of those coming off work. As 
 will be seen, the examinations as a whole occupied a considerable amount of time, but 
 the time lost by individual workers was a few minutes only, as they usually 
 attended in groups of two or three, fresh groups arriving as the tests of the earlier 
 ones were completed. 
 
 Owing to the fact that the investigation was carried on for so many weeks, 
 and that those engaged became thoroughly familiar with conditions under which 
 the workers lived, it was possible to obtain information upon matters which may, 
 perhaps, be regarded as lying outside the scope of the present inquiry, such as the 
 need for the provision of canteens in munitions factories, the question of the proper- 
 feeding of the factory worker, the provision of accommodation in factories for the 
 changing and drying of shoes and clothing, and the proper use of appliances pro- 
 vided for ventilating the workrooms. 
 
 Reference to some of these matters will be found in Section III. 
 
 The Report is divided into three Sections, the first dealing with Fatigue as 
 a result of Overtime, the second dealing with the influence of Fatigue and of Over- 
 time upon Output, whilst the third Section deals with more general matters. In 
 this Section is included also a reference to a question of especial interest at the present 
 time, viz., the general effect of long-continued overtime upon the worker (exhaustion 
 and ultimate breakdown, recovery in spite of inadequate rest periods, equilibrium 
 and " balancing "). 
 
 A short summary of each section is provided. 
 
 I have been greatly assisted in the work by my demonstrator, Mr. P. Phillips, 
 B.Sc., and by my research assistant, Mr. Win. Emery. To both of these my best 
 thanks are due. 
 
 I am also greatly indebted to those factory proprietors and managers who have 
 given me facilities for carrying out the tests, and have modified existing arrange- 
 ments in order to make those tests more thorough. 
 
 The work is being continued and extended to fresh industries. Much additional 
 material has been obtained, and, so far as examined, corroborates the conclusions 
 already arrived at. 
 
 I have the honour to be, 
 
 Sir, 
 Your obedient Servant, 
 
 A. F. STANLEY KENT. 
 
LIST OF CHARTS. 
 
 Subject. 
 
 Workers. 
 
 Page. 
 
 Chart No 
 
 
 
 J* 
 
 H 
 
 )i 
 i 
 ) 
 n 
 >j 
 
 ?i 
 
 5) 
 
 11 
 J1 
 
 )) 
 
 >* 
 11 
 
 . 1 Fatigue. 
 2 
 
 3 
 4 
 
 4A 
 
 5 
 6 
 GA 
 
 7 
 
 8 Recovery 
 
 '' 
 
 10 
 11 Output, 
 12 
 13 
 14 
 15 
 16 1 
 
 Complex Reaction Time. L 
 
 > ) 
 Acuity of Sight 
 
 etters 
 ,, ... ... 
 
 K. I 
 E. 1 
 E. 2 
 E. 2 
 F. 14, 15, 16 
 E. 41 
 E. 15 
 E. 15 
 
 E. 21-25 
 E. 12 
 
 E. 12 
 E. 1, 2, 4, 6, 18-20 
 
 10 
 10 
 11 
 12 
 12 
 13 
 14 
 15 
 
 17 
 
 lit 
 
 21 
 
 20 
 1 
 
 ' r at end. 
 
 Blood-pressure, Hearing, and Sight 
 Complex Reaction Time. Letteis 
 
 ,, ,, , ,, 
 
 '1 ), 5, ), .- ... 
 
 Day and Night. Complex Reaction Time. 
 Hearing, and Sight 
 
 . Complex Reaction Time, 
 during Night. Complex 
 Colours 
 
 Colours... 
 Reaction Time. 
 
 during Dinner-time Interval 
 Winders 
 
 
 
 
 
 Lint-packers 
 
 
 ,, ,, ... 
 Boracic Lint-packers 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION I. 
 
 FATIGUE AS A RESULT OF OVERTIME. 
 
 (For Summary, see p. 21.) 
 
 Fatigue as dealt with in these pages and as indicated by the tests described is 
 taken to mean a diminished efficiency of the organism occurring after labour and 
 partly dependent upon it.* 
 
 The effect of labour other things being equal will depend upon (a) its severity 
 and (b) its duration. The relation between these factors and the net result is not, 
 however, a simple one, for even a slight lengthening of a task may result in the 
 production of an altogether disproportionate amount of fatigue. 
 
 The practical bearing of this is on the question of overtime. It has been 
 thought that the simplest method of increasing output in times of stress is to 
 increase the number of hours in the working day. But extra hours must neces- 
 sarily be added at the end of a day's work, and the result will vary according to 
 the previous condition of the worker. Should the work of the ordinary day have 
 been so light that no fatigue is evident at the end of it, the workers will be compara- 
 tively fresh when they start upon the period of overtime and will suffer little. If, 
 however, the previous work has been severe, they will already be fagged and jaded, 
 and the extra labour will produce a greater effect. 
 
 Results obtained recently show further that overtime has an effect which is not 
 confined strictly to the day on which it is worked. The worker is in a less favourable 
 condition to resist fatigue after an ordinary day's work, followed by a night's rest, 
 than before, and the effect of an overtime day is correspondingly greater. Two or 
 more overtime days produce a proportionately greater lowering of efficiency, and the 
 effect is more pronounced if the overtime days are consecutive than if they are 
 separated by days of normal length. Finally, an overtime day introduced towards 
 the end of the week is more harmful than one worked nearer its beginning. 
 
 Besides these considerations, which deal with the conditions under 
 which work is performed, there are individual differences amongst the workers 
 which affect the result. Such differences are partly constitutional and partly 
 matters of habit. Workers in a mill are of various types, some are strong, others 
 are weak and more easily tired. Again, some are aware of the importance of 
 daily rules of life, matters of food and sleep and relaxation, whilst others are care- 
 less and take no thought for health until health is lost. Tasks of similar severity 
 will produce different amounts of fatigue in members of these different classes. 
 There will also be variations in fitness amongst the workers from day to day, which 
 will affect the fatigue registered. 
 
 From these considerations it is clear that the severity of the symptoms of fatigue 
 exhibited by an individual worker at a particular time will depend on a large 
 number of causes, to understand which it is necessary to study the worker's home life 
 and surroundings as well as the conditions inside the factory. 
 
 The factory tests have been made as follows : 
 
 Description of Tests used. 
 
 The tests described were carried out in the morning before the examinee 
 commenced work and again in the evening when the day's task had been completed. 
 Where Recovery during Intervals was investigated additional tests were made at the 
 beginning and end of the interval. 
 
 * Physiologically, fatigue may be regarded as the expression of a condition of the neuro- 
 muscular mechanism which tends to prevent further expenditure of energy when the supply runs 
 low. The seat of fatigue is rather on the nervous than on the muscular side. It is not a direct 
 expression of the exhaustion of the supply of muscular energy, though probably dependent in great 
 measure upon it. The appearance of fatigue is due to the action of a protective mechanism, similar 
 to the safety-valve or electric fuse, but, unlike these, acting when energy becomes deficient. For the 
 purposes of this paper, it may be taken as an indication of a diminished supply of energy and a 
 lessened capacity for work. 
 
8 
 TEST No. 1. A. LETTERS. B. COLOURS. 
 
 Complex Reaction Time (Letter or Colour Test}. 
 
 The test was made as in former experiments by requiring the examinee to depress 
 a particular key which, at the same time that its movement was recorded on a 
 moving drum, closed a circuit and caused a shutter to fall, thus exposing one of a 
 series of letters or, in the case of the colour test, a particular colour. The examinee 
 was required to recognise the letter or colour exposed, to select from six keys in 
 front of him the one bearing a similar letter or colour to that exposed and to depress 
 it. The result of depressing this second key was to produce a second mark upon 
 the drum. The distance between the two marks the first produced as a result of 
 the depression of the first key, the second produced as a result of the depression 
 of the second key was shorter or longer according to the time taken by the examinee 
 to recognise the letter (or colour) exposed, to select the appropriate key, and to 
 depress it. A chronograph marking fractions of a second allowed the time corre- 
 sponding to this distance to be measured. 
 
 In this way a series of values has been obtained, each of which represents the 
 time in fractions of a second which was necessary for the examinee to respond under 
 the particular circumstances of the test. In each case of the letter test two separate 
 readings were taken, and the mean of the two has been used in constructing the 
 curve. The values obtained with colours were uniformly lower than those obtained 
 when letters were used. 
 
 The values which appear in some of the curves are the differences between the 
 morning and evening figures expressed in hundreths of a second. In cases where the 
 morning value was greater than the evening value, indicating greater rapidity of 
 response in the evening, the curve rises above the zero line. The curve drops below 
 the zero line when the evening value is greater than the morning value. Thus, a fall 
 of the line indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 In other curves the actual values recorded were used. 
 
 It is not suggested that these differences in time of response are to be taken as 
 expressions of absolute amounts of fatigue. They may, however, be taken as general 
 indications as to whether the process of repair is able to keep pace with the process 
 of energy expenditure. 
 
 TEST No. 2. 
 
 A cuity of Hearing. 
 
 The test was made by determining the greatest distance at which the examinee 
 could hear the tick of a given watch. The examinee was seated on a stool and 
 directed to look at an object immediately to his front. A metre rule was held 
 behind the ear so that the zero was opposite the pinna. The distance was 
 determined at which the examinee was just able to hear the sound of the watch, 
 repeated tests being made, and the watch sometimes being held behind the examiner's 
 back as a control. The mark level with the watch face was in each case taken 
 ns indicating the distance to be recorded. 
 
 TEST No. 3. 
 
 Acuity of Sight. 
 
 The test was made by determining the greatest distance at which the 
 examinee could identify letters of standard size stencilled upon card. 
 Numerous cards were made use of, the letters on which were arranged in 
 different orders, so as to avoid error through the examinee becoming familiar 
 with individual cards. The distances were measured by marking the floor 
 at intervals of half metres. Intermediate points were determined by measuring 
 from the nearest point with the metre rule. The distances are probably correct to 
 the nearest centimetre. The distance recorded is the greatest at which the examinee 
 made no error in identifying the letters. In some cases it was found that all the 
 letters except one usually F or P were identified, and that the distance had to 
 be shortened very considerably before that particular letter could be recognised. In 
 such cases two values have been recorded, but the one used in the curves has always 
 been that at which all letters were recognised. 
 
TEST No. 4. 
 Systolic Blood-pressure. 
 
 The test was made by determining the systolic blood-pressure by means of 
 Dr. H. French's sphygmomanometer. The bandage of the apparatus was applied 
 over the shirt sleeve of the examinee, the coat having been removed. In the case of 
 women it was applied over the sleeve of the blouse. The examinee being seated on 
 a stool, the right arm was laid lightly on the table at the level of the heart. In all 
 cases the right arm was used. As a general rule it was found that the development 
 of fatigue was accompanied by a rise in the blood pressure, though this was modified 
 by the diurnal variation. 
 
 General Description of Charts. 
 
 In order to make the curves more easily understood the differences have been 
 calculated as follows : 
 
 In the Reaction Time test the differences are 
 
 M-E 
 (Morning value minus evening value.) 
 
 If the evening value has been increased by fatigue the difference will be 
 negative, and the curve will fall below the zero line. 
 
 In the tests of Acuity of Sight and Hearing the" differences are 
 
 E -M 
 
 If the evening value has been diminished by fatigue the difference will be 
 negative, and the curve will fall below the zero line. 
 
 In the tests of Blood-pressure the differences are 
 
 M-E 
 
 If the evening value has been increased by fatigue the difference will be 
 negative, and the curve will fall below the zero line. 
 
 The curves show a fall of the line, indicating the development of fatigue, on 
 days on which work was performed. The Tables gives the actual readings from 
 which the curves were made.* 
 
 Description of Special Charts. 
 
 It is impossible to reproduce all the results obtained. The following are typical 
 examples, the general conclusions from which are corroborated by other experi- 
 ments : 
 
 Chart No. 1 is drawn from values obtained in the examination of No. 1 worker, 
 employed in the drying room. See particulars on p. 10, and on p. 66. The test 
 used was that referred to as Complex Reaction Time for letters, described on p. 8. 
 
 It is a good example of the general effect of overtime in the production of 
 fatigue. The first value inserted, that of Monday, shows a difference of 86/100 sec., 
 and this being above the base line, indicates that the response was to that extent 
 quicker in the evening than in the morning, i.e., according to the result of this 
 particular test, fatigue was not only absent, but the individual was actually in a 
 better state in the evening than in the morning of that particular day. 
 
 It must be remarked, however, that this result was obtained at the beginning 
 of the week on Monday and is probably to be attributed to the fact that a rest 
 period of 42 hours had elapsed since work had been done. It is an example of the 
 " Monday effect." 
 
 On the following day, Tuesday, the result is different. Overtime was worked 
 and a difference in the opposite direction was registered, indicating a response in 
 the morning quicker by 42/100 sec. than in the evening. On the next day, Wednes- 
 day, overtime was worked again, and again an evening value 38/100 'sec. longer 
 than the morning reading was obtained. On Thursday no overtime was worked, 
 
 ' The course of the curve is determined neither by the development of fatigue nor by recovery 
 alone, but by the interaction of these two processes. 
 
 7312 
 
10 
 
 and the curve gives an unmistakable indication of this, inasmuch as it shows an 
 evening value longer than the morning only by 1/100 sec. This result is the 
 more striking owing to the fact that on the following day, Friday, overtime was 
 worked again, with the result that the evening value at once rose, and the difference 
 was 30, 100 sec 
 
 CHART Xo 1. 
 COMPLEX REACTION TIME (LETTERS . 
 
 Differences (M E). 
 
 Factory E, Drier No. 1. 
 
 (Week ending Saturday, October 30th, 1915.) 
 
 A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 too 
 
 90 
 SO 
 7O 
 
 so 
 
 50 
 4O 
 30 
 2O 
 
 n 
 o 
 
 -ID 
 -20 
 -SO 
 -4O 
 -SO 
 
 M. 
 
 S-S-30 
 
 Tu. 
 
 w. 
 
 6-8 
 
 Th. 
 
 Sa 
 6-/2 
 
 %2%2%^%% 
 
 Overtime Days. Orertime Day. 
 
 TABLE. 
 Fatigue = E M. 
 
 Reaction Time. 
 (Letters.) 
 
 
 
 M. 
 
 T. 
 
 W. 
 
 Th. 
 
 F. 
 
 S. 
 
 M. 
 E. 
 
 1-88 
 1-02 
 
 1-44 
 1-86 
 
 1-38 
 1-76 
 
 1-48 
 1-49 
 
 1-85 
 2-15 
 
 1-32 
 1-06 
 
 M.-E. 
 
 86 
 
 -42 
 
 -38 
 
 1 
 
 -30 
 
 26 
 
 (Differences.) 
 
 On the Saturday, when work was stopped at 12 noon, the morning value was 
 again greater than that obtained in the mid-day test. 
 
 CHART No. 2. 
 COMPLEX REACTION TIME (LETTERS). 
 
 Actual Values. 
 Factory E, Drier No. 1. 
 (Week ending Saturday, October 30th, 1915.) 
 A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 I'lOOfcc. 
 
 M. 
 
 Ocf/3/5 
 
 Orrrtime Dayt. 
 
11 
 
 It is evident that these results indicate a difference between the fatigue pro- 
 duced on those days on which overtime was worked and those on which it was not. 
 
 The results are expressed differently in Chart 2. where actual values are 
 plotted instead of differences between morning and evening. As is frequently 
 the case, Monday shows no indication of the development of fatigue during the 
 day. but, on the contrary, a considerable improvement. During the night the 
 opposite effect is seen. This is the usual " Monday effect," the cause of which is 
 discussed later. 
 
 In Chart No. 3, the results are shown of a series of tests of the acuity of sight. 
 The period covered is the six days from October 25th to October 30th. inclusive. 
 The conditions were similar to those which obtained in the former experiment. 
 values above the base line representing greater acuity in the evening, and rice rers'i. 
 The differences are, however, given in centimetres, and indicate differences in the 
 distance at which standard letters could be identified. 
 
 CHART No. 0. 
 
 ACCITY OF SIGHT. 
 
 Differences (E M). 
 
 Factory E, Drier No. 2. 
 
 (Week ending Saturday, October 30th, 1915.) 
 A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 W 
 
 cms 
 ISO 
 
 M. 
 e - s 
 
 Tu. 
 
 e- a 
 
 n. f. 
 
 e -sso e-e 
 
 Ja. 
 6 -/a 
 
 100 
 
 222/22%. 
 
 Overtime Day*. 
 
 Overtime Day. 
 
 TABLE. 
 
 Fatigue = .M E. 
 
 (Sight.) 
 
 
 M. 
 
 T. 
 
 \V. 
 
 Th. 
 
 . 
 
 F ' 
 
 S. 
 
 E. 
 M. 
 
 520 
 373 
 
 380 
 
 47(i 
 
 326 
 
 411 
 
 313 
 
 368 
 
 i 
 362 369 
 
 476 i:}?, 
 
 E.-M. 
 
 147 
 
 - 90 
 
 | - 85 
 
 1 - 55 
 
 - 114 - 64 
 
 (Differences.) 
 
 As before, the result on Monday shows no indication of fatigue, although 
 overtime was worked, due probably to the fact that a rest of 42 hours had been 
 taken. On the Tuesday and Wednesday, on both of which overtime was worked, 
 fatigue was indicated by a lesser visual acuity corresponding to differences of 90 cms. 
 and 84 cms., respectively. On the Thursday no overtime was worked, and the 
 difference in distance was reduced at once to 52 cms. That the change was not 
 greater, even to the extent of approaching the result obtained on Monday, is probably 
 due to the fact that three consecutive days of overtime had been worked, and 
 consequently the power of recovery had' suffered. That this was probably 
 the case is indicated also in Saturday's result, for on Saturday a half-day the 
 line rose again, but recovery was imperfect. 
 
 7312 
 
 B 2 
 
12 
 
 On the Friday, when overtime was worked, the difference rose to 112 cms. 
 
 Thus, two individuals, working under similar conditions, but tested by different 
 methods, gave very similar results. 
 
 In the latter curve, as in the former, the effect of overtime in producing fatigue 
 is well brought out, whilst, in addition, the effect of consecutive days of overtime 
 in diminishing the power of recovery should be noted. 
 
 Similar results are obtained if actual values are plotted instead of the differences 
 between the morning and evening figures. This has been done in Chart No. 4. 
 
 CHART No. 4. 
 
 ACUITY OF SIGHT. 
 
 'A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 The curve is constructed from the fame set of figures as No. 3. Instead of the differences being 
 used, however, the actual morning and evening values have been plotted. 
 
 Cms 
 
 Sa. 
 
 Overtime Day*. 
 
 Overtime Day. 
 
 Allowing for the familiar effect on Monday, which results in a better condition 
 on Monday evening than in the morning, and is followed by the curious deterioration 
 during Monday night, the remaining days of the week show, on Tuesday and 
 Wednesday the effect of two overtime days, on Thursday the lesser effect of an 
 ordinary day, on Friday the exaggerated effect of an overtime day towards the end 
 of the week, and on Saturday the usual lessened effect due to a half-day. This effect 
 of half a day at the end of the week is, however, greater than the effect of a whole 
 day in the middle of the week, on Thursday. The curve also affords an example 
 of the advantage to be gained by avoiding a series of consecutive overtime days. 
 
 CHART No. 4A. 
 
 BLOOD PRESSURE, HEARING, AND SIGHT. 
 Average Values, M and E, of three Women Workers, Nos. 14, 15, and 16, in Engineering Factory F. 
 
 (Week ending Saturday, December 18th, 1915.) 
 A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. ' 
 
 Overtime Days. 
 
 JilooA Pressure 
 Hearing. 
 
 Sight. 
 
13 
 
 In Chart No. 4.\ the results are given of an examination of three women working 
 in an engineering factory. One of these worked a planing machine, another a 
 shaping machine, whilst the third was a turner's assistant. Their work was heavy, 
 and their hours 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. The Chart shows the results of three separate 
 sets of experiments carried on at the same time. The uppermost curve shows 
 variations of blood pressure, the middle curve variations in the acuity of hearing, 
 whilst the lowermost curve shows variations in the acuity of sight. 
 
 The Monday effect is not shown, unless the poor recovery on Monday night is 
 ;ui indication of its presence. It appears often to be absent in workers who have 
 recently taken up fresh work, and these individuals had been at their present 
 employment only a short time (2 months, 3j months, 3^ months). On Tuesday 
 the fatigue shown is greater than on Monday, and on Wednesday greater than 
 on Tuesday. The recovery on both of these days is fair, though less perfect on 
 Wednesday. The three curves show similar variations. 
 
 Chart No. 5 represents values obtained from an examination of the 
 Reaction Time (letters) of a member of the office staff. His occupation 
 was of a different character from that of the individuals already dealt with. His 
 normal day commenced at 8.30 a.m. and ended at 5.30 p.m. Overtime was 
 worked sometimes till 8, and sometimes till 10 p.m. The curve given extends over 
 two periods of a week each. In each period overtime is seen to produce its 
 characteristic effect in lowering the curve. The effect of two consecutive days of 
 overtime (Thursday and Friday in each week) is shown. 
 
 The overtime on Friday in the second week, though ending at 8 p.m., has 
 produced a greater effect than the overtime on Thursday,- ending at 10 p.m. 
 
 Numerous similar tests were made upon members of the office staff. The general 
 result was to show that in many cases the hours worked involved a considerable 
 strain on the powers of those employed. 
 
 CHART No. 5. 
 COMPLEX REACTION TIME (LETTERS). 
 
 Differences (M E). 
 Factory E, Member of Office Staff, No. 41. 
 
 20 
 
 (Period ending November 13th, 1915.) 
 A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 M Tu. W Th. F. Sa M. Tu \V Th F Sa 
 
 S-30 -S-3O &3O-S3O 8-3O-S-308-3O-/O 8-3O- /O 8-ZQ-S-3O.8-3Q-S-3O. 8-X-f-SO 8-3O - /<? 8-3O- 8 8-3O-/2 
 
 /O 
 
 -/o 
 
 -20 
 
 -30 
 
 -40 
 
 -so 
 
 Overtime Days. 
 
 Overtime Days. 
 
u 
 
 TABLE. 
 Fatigue = E - M. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 First Week. 
 
 Second Week. 
 
 
 Reaction time. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 
 
 (Letters.) 
 
 
 M. 
 
 T. 
 
 W. 
 
 Th. 
 
 F. 
 
 M. T. 
 
 W. 
 
 Th. 
 
 F. 
 
 S. 
 
 
 
 M. 
 
 1-40 
 
 1-42 
 
 1-35 
 
 1-44 
 
 1-32 
 
 1-25 
 
 1-52 
 
 1-22 
 
 1-44 
 
 1-50 
 
 1-35 
 
 
 
 E. 
 
 1-16 
 
 1-58 
 
 1-35 
 
 1-63 
 
 1-6H 
 
 1-63 
 
 1-41 
 
 1-35 
 
 1-61 
 
 1-76 1-30 
 
 
 
 M.-E. 
 
 24 
 
 -16 
 
 
 
 -19 
 
 -37 
 
 -38 
 
 1] 
 
 -13 
 
 -17 
 
 -26 
 
 o 
 
 (Differences.) 
 
 
 
 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Chart No. 6 represents values obtained from a worker in the spinning shed. 
 The test used was the Reaction Time (letters) as in No. 5. The examinee 
 was ill on Monday and this possibly may explain the low result obtained 
 on Tuesday. Wednesday was an overtime day and caused a marked drop in the 
 curve. Thursday was a normal day and the curve rose accordingly. On Friday 
 overtime was worked again and was indicated by a fall. On Saturday a half-day 
 the curve rose considerably above the line. The sudden drop of the curve on the 
 two overtime days is significant. The illness was merely a general indisposition. 
 
 CHART No. 6. 
 COMPLEX REACTION TIME (LETTERS). 
 
 Factory E, Spinner No. 15. 
 (Week ending Saturday, November 6tb, 1915.) 
 A. fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 M 
 
 7u. IV- Th. F 
 
 6 - s-so 6-8 e -sso 6-s 
 
 Sa 
 
 e - / 
 
 so 
 
 40 
 
 so 
 
 20 
 
 /o 
 
 o 
 
 -/o 
 
 -20 
 -30 
 -40 
 -SO 
 -60 
 -7O 
 -SO 
 -90 
 
 Worker ill. Overtime Day. Overtime Day. 
 
 TABLE. 
 
 Fatigue = E M. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 M. 
 
 T. 
 
 W. 
 
 Th. 
 
 F. 
 
 S. 
 
 
 Reaction time. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (Letters.) 
 
 M. 
 
 Ill 1-17 1-38 
 
 1-74 
 
 1-44 
 
 1-70 
 
 
 
 E. 
 
 
 1-63 
 
 2-20 
 
 1-88 
 
 1-78 
 
 1-35 
 
 
 
 M.-E. 
 
 
 
 -46 
 
 -82 
 
 -14 
 
 -34 
 
 35 
 
 (Differences.) 
 
 The curve in this case is complicated by the illness of the worker. Two 
 processes were at work, one the gradual recovery from illness, the other the gradual 
 development of fatigue. The result of the former process may be recognised in the 
 indications 'of less fatigue on Thursday than on Tuesday produced by a normal 
 
15 
 
 day's work, and similarly by the fatigue of Friday being less than that of Wednesday, 
 both overtime days. Usually the opposite result is obtained, and similar amounts of 
 work produce more fatigue at the end of the week than at the beginning. The 
 recovery on Saturday a half-day should be noted. 
 
 By arranging the figures somewhat differently the effect of the extra strain of 
 overtime on this subject, rendered unusually sensitive by illness, is brought out even 
 more clearly. In Chart No. BA the actual figures obtained are plotted instead of 
 the differences between morning and evening values. An ordinary day's work on 
 Tuesday produces much fatigue. The effect is exaggerated on Wednesday, when 
 overtime was worked. On Friday, recovery from the illness seems to be fairly 
 complete and although near the end of the week, an overtime day produces less 
 effect than on Wednesday, just as the ordinary day's work on Thursday produces 
 less effect than a similar task on Tuesday. 
 
 There is evidence of a similar dual effect in those portions of the curve indi- 
 cating recovery from fatigue, the usual weekly course of which is modified by the 
 passing away of the state of illness. 
 
 We have then several sets of results from different individuals obtained by 
 different methods. The results are strikingly similar in their indications. On 
 overtime days fatigue is indicated in the curves by changes of considerable magni- 
 tude, whereas, when normal hours have been worked, such indications are slight. 
 The methods depend upon the acuity of the sense of sight, the acuity of the sense 
 of hearing, the height of the blood-pressure, and the recognition of different letters. 
 
 The curves given represent the results of a small proportion of the many 
 hundreds of tests carried out recently. Those selected will serve to indicate the 
 general character of the whole. 
 
 CHART No. 6A. 
 COMPLEX REACTION (LETTERS). 
 
 Factory E, Spinner No. 15. 
 (Week ending November 6th, 1915.) 
 
 Actual values plotted. 
 A fall of the curve indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 M. 
 
 /3I 
 /Sff 
 
 /S9 
 
 /SO 
 /S7 
 
 /a* 
 
 201 
 ZoS 
 2/6 
 222 
 
 Tu. 
 
 6 -S-30 
 
 W. 
 
 6-S 
 
 6- 
 
 f So. 
 
 s-3o e-a e-/s 
 
 
 
 Worker ill. 
 
 Overtime Daij. Overtime Day. 
 
 It is evident that overtime produces in the worker differences of physiological 
 state which affect different functions of the body and which may be recognised by 
 several tests. It is necessary to examine more closely this physiological difference, 
 and the conditions under which it appears. 
 
 The ordinary day's work, when tested by these methods, gave no indication of 
 fatigue (Charts Nos. 1 and 2), or these indications if present were inconsiderable 
 (Charts Nos. 3, 5, 6). When overtime was worked the signs of fatigue were greater 
 (Charts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). That is to say, the overtime day has a greater effect 
 
16 
 
 in producing fatigue than the normal day. But, in the particular instances taken v 
 the overtime day differs from the normal day only in having two additional hours 
 added to it. The normal day begins at 6 a.m. and ends at 5.30 p.m. The overtime 
 day begins at 6 a.m. and ends (as a rule) at 8 p.m. Moreover, those individuals who 
 are working overtime have an additional rest interval from 5.30 p.m. to 6 p.m., 
 during which they are supplied with tea, cakes, &c., free of cost. It might be 
 expected that they would be somewhat refreshed when they commenced, at 6 p.m., 
 the two hours' period of overtime. Yet at the end of this period they are con- 
 siderably more fatigued than they would be at the end of a normal day. Why 
 is this? 
 
 The answer to the question is probably somewhat as follows : 
 
 When once an individual has, through labour during ordinary hours, reached a 
 certain degree of fatigue, and proceeds to further labour (overtime) without taking 
 the repose necessary to dissipate the fatigue already produced, this further labour 
 has a greater physiological effect and exhausts the organism more than would a 
 similar amount of labour performed when fatigue was absent. This is a well-known 
 fact in physiology; it is also a matter of ordinary experience. It is of importance 
 in the present connection because it indicates that OVERTIME LABOUR is MORE 
 
 HARMFUL TO THE WORKER THAN LABOUR PERFORMED DURING ORDINARY HOURS. It IS 
 
 therefore PHYSIOLOGICALLY EXTRAVAGANT.* 
 
 . The Development of Fatigue by Day and by Night. 
 
 It not infrequently happens, when the demand for output is great, that 
 machinery has to be kept running continuously. Accordingly, it is important to 
 know whether the development of fatigue in the worker runs a similar course by 
 night and by day. 
 
 In order to ob.tain information on this point, experiments were carried out on 
 five men employed in the room in which surgical lint is made. The cotton cloth, 
 previously woven, is passed through machines in which it is acted upon by moving 
 knives in such a way as to raise on the surface a fine down familiar as a characteristic 
 of the material. . 
 
 The work is carried on in a roomon the ground floor. Up to Christmas, 1915, 
 there were 104 machines at work in the room. Twenty new machines have been 
 installed recently. Owing to the presence of so many machines the noise is always 
 great. Temperature is normal and ventilation fair, but much fluff is always present. 
 The machines are of two types, those taking slightly over 9 hours to finish a piece 
 of cloth, and those taking only 8 hours. The length of a piece of cloth is 40 yards. 
 
 The staff of the room consists of six men and two foremen. Each man 
 superintends about 20 machines. 
 
 The hours worked in this room are 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. in 
 alternate weeks. Thus, the men work day and night shifts in alternate weeks, and 
 the same men were examined, first when working on a day shift, and afterwards 
 when working on a night shift. 
 
 The tests employed were Reaction Time (Colours), Hearing and Sight. The 
 results obtained have been averaged both with regard to the tests made and also 
 with regard to the five men examined. 
 
 The chart shows the results of tests which extended over a period of nearly two 
 weeks. The first week shows the development of fatigue, as indicated by these 
 tests, during a period of day labour. The second week shows the development of 
 fatigue during a period of labour by night. A fall in the line indicates the 
 development of fatigue. 
 
 The degree of fatigue developed was greater during the night shift than during 
 the day. 
 
 * The payment of higher wages renders overtime economically extravagant also. Yet higher 
 wages are not sufficient to make it universally desired by the workers. Enquiries were made of 
 18 operatives in various departments of a large factory as to whether the overtime day with its extr.-i 
 rate of pay, or the ordinary day, ending at 5.30 p.m., would be preferred. In reply 15 voted against 
 overtime, the remaining three stating that they were indifferent in the matter. 
 
17 
 
 CHART No. 7. 
 
 Ci I;VF. OK FATIGUE. LINT MAKKKS. 
 ILLUSTRATING EFFECT OF DAY AND NIGHT WORK. 
 
 I COMPLEX REACTION TIME (COLOURS). 
 
 \CUITV OF HEARING. 
 ( ACUITY OF SIGHT. 
 
 K;i<-iory K, Average of fivo men, Nos. 21-25. 
 
 (October I'.Hh to November 4tli, IDlo.) 
 A fill I of the line indicates the development of fatigue. 
 
 M. 
 
 Tu. 
 
 IV. 
 
 JTt. 
 
 /r 
 
 Sa. 
 
 M. 
 
 Th. 
 
 Sa. 
 
 w 
 
 
 
 n 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ?r 
 
 
 
 s * 
 s \ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ff> 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 ' \ 
 
 
 
 n 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ft 
 
 
 s 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -ff> 
 
 
 *J 
 
 V 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ?o 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -*n 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 4O 
 
 
 
 
 
 g 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 \ 
 
 
 -m 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 '/"" - 
 
 \ 
 
 
 so 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 \ 
 
 70 
 
 
 
 
 \ 
 
 \ t 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 i 
 
 ftp 
 
 
 
 
 \ ' 
 
 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 
 
 
 -"0 
 
 
 
 
 \ / 
 
 
 
 o- 
 
 a,_ 
 
 __/ 
 
 
 
 
 -/no 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 
 rf 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 In attempting to find an explanation of this fact, it must be remembered that 
 the men working on a night shift are compelled to get their sleep in the day 
 time, and though this may not be difficult under favourable circumstances, it is 
 by no means easy in a workman's home. Indeed, every one of the men examined 
 stated that he slept well by night, but badly by day. Probably, therefore, one of 
 the reasons of the development of extra fatigue by men working on night duty is 
 the inadequacy of the rest obtained by day. 
 
 This is a good example of the importance of home conditions in an investigation 
 of industrial fatigue. 
 
 Those familiar with the conditions will scarcely accept the suggestion that 
 the work performed at night is more severe and exhausting than that done by da> , 
 for indeed the reverse is probably the case. 
 
 There is another factor which is important. The vital functions of the 
 body are at their lowest in the early morning, and although there is apparently 
 an attempt at an adjustment when the ordinary uses of day and night are reversed, 
 yet this adjustment takes an appreciable time for its development, so that at the 
 beginning of the period its influence would not be felt. Indeed, it may be that 
 in the gradual development of this adjustment there is an explanation of the fact 
 that the fatigue revealed is severe at the commencement of the period of night work, 
 and becomes lessened as the week progresses and the above-mentioned adjustment 
 attains completion. 
 
 Should this explanation be confirmed by further work, it would provide an 
 argument in favour of lengthening the period over which the day or night shift 
 is worked by individual men, in order that the advantages derived from the adjust- 
 ment might be enjoyed for a longer time. 
 
 The Recovery from Fatigue. 
 
 Under ordinary circumstances labour is performed in tasks of definite length, 
 separated by intervals for rest. Under ideal conditions rest intervals would occur 
 sufficiently often and would be sufficiently prolonged to ensure that a perfect recovery 
 should be attained after the performance of every task. 
 
 7312 c 
 
IS 
 
 An investigation of the manner in which recovery i'rom fatigue comes about 
 is rendered complicated by the fact that neither work nor rest ever holds the 
 field to the exclusion of its opposite. Hardly ever does an individual work with all 
 his might for more than a few minutes at a time. Very seldom does an individual 
 in ordinary health resign himself to absolute repose unless asleep. Even during 
 sleep repose is only relative, as many muscles in the body are still active the muscles 
 of respiration, of the heart and blood vessels, and of the alimentary canal. Thus 
 work and rest are ever intermingled; and although life is divided roughly into 
 periods of labour and periods for recovery, yet fatigue is continually being produced 
 during rest, and during labour the organism is continually striving to do away 
 with its results. Only, indeed, as a result of this last process can work be 
 carried on continuously for more than a very short period at a time. An isolated 
 muscle, cut off alike from all sources of energy and from all possibility of the 
 elimination of its waste, is able to perform an amount of work astonishing indeed 
 in view of the smallness of its bulk but strictly limited. The muscle in the body, on 
 the other hand, gets rid of its waste to the blood stream, and from the blood stream 
 continually receives fresh supplies of energy. Only when the blood itself is becoming 
 impoverished will the supply fail, and before this happens usually fresh food 
 material will have been absorbed. 
 
 The fatigue of the worker is largely mental, or at all events central. But 
 whilst knowledge of this is imperfect, it is perhaps better to reason in terms of 
 muscular fatigue if this can be done without danger of large errors being made. 
 
 A full appreciation of the constant intermingling of the processes of fatigue 
 production and fatigue elimination is needed- to approach the question of the 
 disappearance of fatigue in the worker during rest periods. 
 
 The figures already given may be employed to illustrate the general process of 
 recovery in individual workers. 
 
 Variations in the power of recovery from fatigue produced by differences 
 in the severity of labour, and especially by differences in the length of the periods 
 of work are shown in Chart No. 2A. The " Monday effect " is well seen, for not only 
 was there no recovery during Monday night, but recovery was actually present during 
 Monday's period of labour. There was improvement between Tuesday evening and 
 Wednesday morning of 31 cms., and between Wednesday evening and Thursday 
 morning of 42 cms. These are both comparatively small values, as the overtime days 
 on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday were sufficient to prevent a thorough recovery 
 from taking place. Thursday was an ordinary day, and accordingly there was a 
 great increase of recovery on Thursday night of 163 cms. On Friday night, after 
 an overtime day, the figure is reduced to 71 cms. 
 
 This and other curves demonstrate that, under certain conditions, the labour 
 of an overtime day may be sufficient to interfere with recovery from fatigue during 
 the night following. 
 
 In Chart No. 6A, recovery in a person who suffered from illness at the beginning 
 of the week is shown. As mentioned in dealing with the development of fatigue in 
 this individual, the illness seems to have been the predominating factor. Recovery 
 on Tuesday night, after a day of ordinary length, is represented by a low value of 
 25 as a result of the illness; on Wednesday night, after an overtime day, by 46. On 
 Thursday night an ordinary day was followed by a recovery of 44, less than that 
 of Wednesday night. Probably the effect of the week's work is now making itself 
 felt, and is even more evident on Friday night, when, after an overtime day, a 
 recovery of only 8 was registered. 
 
 * As illustrating the results of this intermingling it may be pointed out that the tests 
 employed not infrequently show that throughout the whole of Monday the ordinary relations of 
 fatigue production and elimination are so upset that the condition of the worker in the evening is 
 actually better than it was in the morning, and, conversely, that throughout the night the relations 
 are so upset that the worker's condition on Tuesday morning is worse than it was on the preceding 
 evening. These points are illustrated in Charts Nos. 1, 2, 2A, 5, and as regards the latter point only 
 in Nos. ;> and 4 also. (See a/s/i Monday effect, p. ;$">.) 
 
1!) 
 
 CHART No. S. 
 CURVE OP RECOVERY. 
 KX REACTION TIME (COLOURS). 
 
 Actual values plotted. 
 
 Factory E, Winder No. I J. 
 
 (Week ending ;!0th .January, 11>J6.) 
 
 A rise of the curve indicates recovery. 
 
 M. 
 
 Tu. 
 6- a 
 
 W Th 
 e-s-so 6-s-so 
 
 /r 
 
 6- S 
 
 90 
 90 
 /oo 
 110 
 
 120 
 ISO 
 
 MO 
 
 -S, 1 
 
 \! 
 
 Orn-tiine. Dai/. 
 
 TABLE. 
 
 Fatigue = M E. 
 
 T. 
 
 W 
 
 Th. 
 
 F. S. 
 
 
 Reaction time. 
 
 
 
 
 
 (Colours.) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 E. 
 
 106 
 
 114 104 <S4 
 
 96 
 
 
 M. 
 
 100 
 
 140 118 
 
 100 
 
 86 
 
 
 M. E. 
 
 6 
 
 - 26 
 
 - 14 - 16 
 
 10 
 
 ^(Differences.) 
 
 Chart No. 8 illustrates a case in which no work was done on Monday. On 
 Tuesday night a fall resembling the ordinary Monday effect occurred. On Wednes- 
 day and Thursday nights good recovery took place after days of ordinary length, 
 whilst on Friday night, after overtime, recovery was much diminished. This is 
 brought out still more clearly in Chart No. 9, where the values are treated differently. 
 The effect of overtime is well shown. 
 
 The recovery already dealt with occurs during the interval between the cessation 
 of labour in the evening and its resumption in the morning. The details of the 
 appearance of recovery, or the disappearance of fatigue, during one of the rest 
 intervals in the course of the day were examined also, and especial attention was 
 given to the relative completeness of the process on successive days of the week. 
 
 For this inquiry seven individuals were selected, three from the spinning room 
 and four from the room in which surgical dressings are dried. The hours in these 
 departments run from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m., from 8.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m., and from 1.30 p.m. 
 to 5.30 p.m. Overtime is worked occasionally. The dinner interval is from 
 12.30 p.m. to 1.30 p.m. and this was selected as the most appropriate period 
 for examination. Use was made of the Complex Reaction Time test with 
 letters, and, as usual, the difference in the time taken to respond to the stimulus 
 before and after the period to be investigated has been taken for the construction of 
 the curve, shortening of the time of response being i-egarded as an indication of the 
 disappearance of fatigue. Results are given in Chart No. 10. 
 
 The examination was carried on for nearly three weeks, commencing on Tuesday, 
 November 2nd, and ending on Monday, November 22nd. On only two occasions was 
 an indication of recovery absent, viz., on the second Friday. November 12th, and on 
 Monday, November loth. With these exceptions the whole period shows that a 
 condition of quicker response follows the rest interval. On Thursday, November 
 4th, the improvement was slight, being no more than 1/100 sec. On Friday, 
 November 19th, the difference ran up to 16/100 sec,, which is about 11 per cent, 
 of the total time occupied. 
 
 7S12 
 
 ,. L , 
 
20 
 
( n.\RT No. '.'. 
 
 CUKVI-; (IK liKCOVKKY l)UHI.N(i THK XlKHT. 
 Co.MI'UOX REACTION TIME (COLOURS). 
 
 DillVrcllr.'.S (K - M). 
 
 Factory K, Winder Xo. \'2. 
 
 (Week endii'i,' iluih January, 1','Jt'..) 
 
 A rise of the curve indicate,-; recovery. 
 
 M. Tu. W. Th. r Sc 
 
 7u. 
 e- a 
 
 W. Th. r 
 e-sso e-sso e- s 
 
 42 
 38 
 34 
 52 
 28 
 24 
 20 
 / 
 /2 
 8 
 
 g 
 
 % 
 
 ' liinj. 
 
 Overtime 
 
 Stated briefly, the process of recovery from fatigue consists of a graduaj 
 disappearance of the results of labour and a return of the worker to his former 
 condition. Ordinary tests do not distinguish between production of fatigue and 
 recovery, but take account of the resultant of these antagonistic processes. To obtain 
 a just appreciation of either separately, further tests would be necessary,* but 
 such tests in practice are usually unnecessary, since the resultant of the two pro- 
 cesses is the important factor, and may be estimated by methods already described. 
 
 In the worker, the power of recovery is determined primarily by his general 
 physical development, state of health and nutrition, freedom from staleness and 
 fatigue. These factors vary from day to day, and differences are found between 
 different workers. The power of recovery is greater at the beginning, less at the 
 (Mid of a period of labour,! and this is true also for the day and week. The curves 
 show that towards the end of a period of labour, towards the end of a day, and 
 towards the end of a week a given amount of labour produces a greater amount 
 of fatigue than at other times; if it is true also that at these times the power of 
 recovery is at its lowest, it necessarily follows that the fatigue accumulated will 
 be at its maximum. 
 
 Further, a lengthened period, caused by the abolition of rest-intervals, a 
 lengthened day, caused by the introduction of overtime, and a lengthened week, 
 caused by an interference with the week-end rest, will lead to a still more rapid 
 production of fatigue and a still less perfect recovery. Even the distribution of 
 the overtime days will affect the result. 
 
 Since the condition of the worker and his efficiency depend upon these factors, 
 I lie question of the proper length of period, day, and week, and of the proper 
 distribution of overtime, is one which merits the closest attention. 
 
 Su inmarij of tied ion I. 
 FATIGUE AS A RESULT OF OVERTIME. 
 
 Fatigue indicates a state of diminished efficiency occurring after labour, and 
 jtailly dependent upon it. The degree of fatigue is determined partly by the 
 duration and character of the labour performed, and partly by a variety of cir- 
 cumstances outside the mill, amongst which the home conditions of the worker are 
 important. 
 
 Labour is hot the sole cause of fatigue. Illness, indisposition, and lack of food 
 may be contributory. Illness and indisposition may greatly diminish the power 
 of recovery. 
 
 * It is impossible to isolate production, since recovery is always in progress, but production itself 
 may be minimised. Under these circumstances careful successive determinations afford a means of 
 estimating the activity of the process of recovery, whilst, if it be permissible to make the assumption 
 that recovery continues to progress unchanged for limited periods of time, or that the rate and 
 direction of its changes are constant, it is possible by subsequent experiments to investigate the 
 process of production also. 
 
 t For exceptions, see under Monday effect. 
 
Existing industrial conditions lead to an increase of the normal development 
 ol fatigue and to a diminution of the normal power of recovery. Members of the 
 office staff may show signs of fatigue and overstrain equally with the factory hands. 
 
 Development of fatigue and recovery are concomitant processes. The rates of 
 the accumulation and disappearance of fatigue are determined by the relative 
 activity of production and recovery. 
 
 Ordinary tests give the resultant of these two processes, which is useful 
 practically, as indicating the existing state, or " fitness," of the worker. 
 
 Development of fatigue preponderates during labour, recovery prepondez-ates 
 during rest. During the day fatigue accumulates. During the night the accumula- 
 tion is dissipated. The effect, however, of the recovery may not show itself on 
 Monday, when co-ordination is disturbed owing to abstention from labour. Where 
 no work is done on Monday, the effect may be transferred -to Tuesday. 
 
 Power of recovery is greater at the beginning of period, day, and week, than 
 towards their end. Fatigue production is less rapid towards the beginning than 
 towards the end. 
 
 Since production is greatest and recovery is least towards the end of period, 
 day, and week, fatigue accumulation is then at its maximum. 
 
 A lengthening of period, day, or week leads to increased fatigue accumulation. 
 The distribution of overtime days affects the result. 
 
 Under present conditions, production of fatigue becomes progressively more 
 rapid from day to day; recovery becomes less rapid. Thus fatigue accumulates, and 
 " balancing," which tends to diminish fatigue by diminishing application, is 
 introduced. Production and recovery are restored to the normal, and accumulated 
 fatigue is dissipated, by the week-end rest. 
 
 Where the week-end rest is suspended, fatigue will persist. 
 
 Residual fatigue, resulting from inadequate rest, leads to lowered efficiency 
 and lessened output. 
 
 Overtime labour, when performed by a tired worker, results in an amount of 
 fatigue out of proportion to the length and severity of the labour. Fatigue produc- 
 tion is increased and recovery is lessened by overtime. 
 
 The fatigue which follows a period of overtime is influenced by the previous 
 condition of the worker. 
 
 An increase in the amount of overtime worked in a given period will produce 
 an increase of fatigue out of proportion to the increased time. 
 
 Overtime periods worked on consecutive days produce more fatigue than if 
 separated by days of ordinary length. 
 
 Overtime introduced late in the week produces more fatigue than if introduced 
 earlier. 
 
 Overtime produces different results in different individuals according to con- 
 stitution, habits, and nutrition, and also according to varying " fitness." It may 
 lead to serious waste of time. 
 
 Overtime, even when not leading to injurious fatigue, is deleterious to health 
 as necessitating long hours spent in the atmosphere and surroundings of the mill, 
 interference with meals, sleep, relaxation and exercise in the open air. 
 
 The effect of overtime is not confined to the days on which it is worked. 
 
 In the great majority of cases investigated, overtime was not desired by the 
 workers. 
 
 The harmful effect of overtime, may be accentuated by the presence of unfriendly 
 supervisors. 
 
 Overtime labour is physiologically and economically extravagant. It frequently 
 fails in achieving its object. 
 
 Labour performed at night may be regarded as analogous to overtime labour. 
 It is performed at unusual hours, 'its effect in producing fatigue may be greater 
 than a similar task performed during the day. This effect appears to be modified 
 after the night work has been in progress for some days, owing to an adaptation 
 of the normal diurnal variations of the worker to the new conditions. For this 
 reason a weekly change from day shift to night shift and vice versa appears to be 
 unduly frequent. The difficulty' of obtaining satisfactory sleep by day affects the 
 result. 
 
23 
 
 SECTION II. 
 
 THE INFLUENCE OF FATIGUE AND OF OVERTIME 
 
 UPON OUTPUT. 
 
 (For Summary, see p. 43.) 
 
 In the previous Section it has been shown that increased fatigue is likely to arise 
 as ;i result of lengthening the ordinary hours of labour. In the present Section 
 an endeavour is made to show the influence of such fatigue, and the result of the 
 working of overtime, upon output. 
 
 The factors which control output include the circumstances of the worker, 
 such as his skill, physical condition and general health, the presence of fatigue, 
 lack of adequate rest, character of food, and existence of worry, and circumstances 
 affecting his work, such as the condition of the machinery, the supply of material, 
 the efficiency of associated workers, weather conditions, &c. There also appear to 
 be factors the exact nature of which is as yet unrecognised. 
 
 Experiments were made upon three categories of workers : 
 Winders. 
 
 Surgical Lint Packers. 
 Boracic Lint Packers. 
 
 In the Winding Room work commences at 6 a.m. and continues till 8 a.m. 
 Half an hour is then allowed for breakfast. The next period of work is from 
 8.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m., when an hour is allowed for dinner. From 1.30 p.m. till 
 5.30 p.m. is the afternoon period, at the end of which those who are not working 
 overtime leave the mill. Those who are working overtime take half an hour for tea, 
 which, with cakes, scones, &c., is provided free of cost. From 6 p.m. till 8 p.m. is the 
 period of overtime. 
 
 The work in the Winding Room is regarded by the Overlooker as being more 
 strenuous than that in other rooms in his department (weaving, &c.). It demands 
 a considerable amount of exertion as well as great manual dexterity. No oppor- 
 tunity is afforded for rest so long as the work is in progress. The operatives state 
 that they find the work tiring, more especially during the overtime period. The 
 constant standing which the work demands is also felt to be a source of fatigue. 
 
 The atmosphere of this roonv is often very close, though apparatus for venti- 
 lation has been provided. 
 
 The character of the work is as follows : 
 
 The yarn is brought up from the spinning frames on bobbins. These are 
 contained in large wicker baskets (skeps), each of which contains about 198 bobbins, 
 and weighs roughly 50 to 60 pounds. The weight appears to be made as follows :- 
 
 " Skep " (wicker basket), 12 to 15 Ibs. 
 
 198 bobbins, about 17^ Ibs. 
 
 Cotton yarn, about 30 Ibs. 
 
 These " doffings " are emptied into a trough about 18 inches from the ground, and 
 just below the winding machine. From the trough the bobbins are taken as required 
 and placed upon spindles, and the end of the yarn carried to a reel fixed upon a 
 revolving spindle above and behind the bobbins. There is a single row of bobbins 
 and a double row of reels. 
 
 The duty of the winder is 
 
 To replace bobbins as they become empty. 
 
 To replace reels as they become full. 
 
 To tie up broken yarn. 
 
 To exercise general supervision over her part of the machine. This 
 
 generally consists of 31 bobbins, with the corresponding reels. 
 The moving and emptying of the " doffings " involves a considerable amount of 
 ,bonr. whilst the constant reaching over and removing of the full reels is by no 
 means light work. Dexterity is demanded above all in tying up the ends of the 
 yarn when a new bobbin or a new reel is commenced, and when the thread is broken 
 by accident. The rapidity with which the bobbins are changed also depends largely 
 upon the dexterity of the worker. The work is paid for at piece rates, and- there 
 are large differences in the earnings of different winders. It is stated that a <*ood 
 winder may deal with up to 15 " doffings " a day 
 
24 
 
 In some experiments the actual time in minutes worked by each individual winder 
 was noted, and the number of bobbins wound in the different periods of the day was 
 ascertained by counting. From these data the number of bobbins wound per hour 
 by each worker in each period of the day was calculated. The results have been 
 used in constructing curves of individual workers, and the average curve has been 
 made from these. In other experiments the " factory time " was taken, instead of 
 the actual minutes worked. *The difference was often considerable. 
 
 On one occasion a worker was provided with a supply of badly spun yarn, 
 which caused delay. On another occasion a winder was removed to a machine 
 dealing with yarn of a different character. The results of the periods so affected 
 have been omitted from the averages. 
 
 Some of the workers were irregular in their attendance in the second week, 
 and, therefore, two averages have been calculated and are shown in the curves the 
 average of all the workers present on any one day (red) and the average of those 
 workers who were present throughout the week (green).* 
 
 The results of all six winders are given in the tables. 
 
 Determination of Output. 
 
 WINDERS. 
 Bobbins per hour. 
 The actual numbers obtained were as follows :- 
 
 Worker's 
 Number. 
 
 
 r. 
 
 g 
 
 8.3012.30. 
 
 1.305.30. 
 
 68. 
 
 
 
 
 No. 8 ... 
 No. 9 ... 
 No. 10... 
 No. 12... 
 
 Average ... 
 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 
 Nov. 22nd. 1915 (Monday). 
 
 I 
 
 Bobbins. 
 202.5 
 121-2 
 141 
 84-0 
 277 
 10)6 -2 
 489 
 29I5-4 
 
 166-3 
 
 Bobbins. 
 603 
 150-75 
 
 998 
 249-5 
 1,099 
 274-75 
 957 
 
 228-3 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 570 
 
 162-5 
 1 .000 
 
 250 
 
 938 
 
 234-5 
 1,010 
 
 252-5 
 
 224-8 
 
 Bobbins. 
 298 
 162-5 
 163 
 103 
 341 
 L86 
 396 
 216 
 
 166-7 
 
 Nov. 23rd (Tuesday). 
 
 No. 8 ... 
 No. 9 ... 
 No. 10... 
 No. 12... 
 
 Average ... 
 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 Total 
 Per hour 
 
 346f 
 
 420 
 
 
 188 
 
 105 
 
 
 245 
 
 810 
 
 
 127 
 
 202-5 
 
 
 245} 
 
 1,033 
 
 
 140 
 
 ,-258-2 
 
 
 453 
 
 909 
 
 1, 
 
 236 
 
 227-2 
 
 
 172 
 
 198 
 
 
 846 
 211-5 
 922 
 230-5 
 880 
 234-6 
 1,170 
 292-5 
 
 242 
 
 273 
 148 
 324 
 176 
 
 162 
 
 s Refer to Charts NOB. 11 and 12. 
 
 t 1 hour 50 minutes. 
 
 f No. 10 ceased work at 7.50 = 1 hour 45 minutes. ' 
 
 No. 10 ceased work at 5.15 = 3 hours 45 minutes. 
 
 N.B. Although each period contains a definite number of hours, the individual workers some- 
 times Arrived late or left early, so that it was necessary to determine the time actually worked by 
 each separately. The above instances will serve as illustrations. Details have not, been given in 
 every case. 
 
25 
 
 Worker's 
 Number. 
 
 
 6-S. 8.3012.30. 1.305.30. 
 
 fi 8 
 
 
 
 Nov. 25 (Thursday). 
 
 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 Bobbins. Bobbins. 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 No. 8 
 
 Total 
 
 279 
 
 867 853 328 
 
 Per hour 
 
 152-1 
 
 216-7 
 
 213-2 
 
 164 
 
 No. 9 Total 
 
 194 1,017 
 
 761 
 
 348 
 
 Per hour 
 
 97 254-2 
 
 190-2 
 
 174 
 
 No. 10 Total 
 
 408 1,003 ' 987 
 
 194(7.15) 
 
 Per hour 
 
 204 250-7 246-7 
 
 155-2 
 
 No. 12 Total 
 
 442 1,028 
 
 983 
 
 392 
 
 Per hour 
 
 221 
 
 257 
 
 245-7 
 
 196 
 
 Average ... 
 
 168-5 
 
 244-6 
 
 223-9 
 
 172-3 
 
 Nov. 26 (Friday). 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 No. 8 Total 
 
 383 929 
 
 802 
 
 603 
 
 Per hour 
 
 209 232-2 
 
 200-5 
 
 301-5 
 
 No. 9 Total ... 496 554 
 
 925 
 
 416 
 
 Per hour ... \ 248* 138'5* 
 
 231-2 
 
 208 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total ... ; 415 1,188 
 
 1,071 
 
 423 
 
 
 Per hour ... 207 -5 297 
 
 267-7 211-5 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total ... 606 1,219 
 
 1,118 405 
 
 
 Per hour ... 303 304 -7 
 
 279-5 202-5 
 
 Average ... 
 
 239-8 
 
 277-9 
 
 244-7 230-8 
 
 Nov. 27 (Saturday). 
 
 No. 8 ... 
 
 Total 
 
 414 
 
 938 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 207 
 
 341 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total ... 414 
 
 844 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour ... 225-8 
 
 297-9 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total ... 520 
 
 858 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour ... ; 283 '6 
 
 312 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total ... 518 
 
 719 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour ... 259 
 
 261-4 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average ... 
 
 
 
 243-8 
 
 303 
 
 
 
 
 
 In the second week the figures were : 
 
 Nov. 29, 1915 (Monday). 
 
 No. 8 
 
 Total 
 
 384 
 
 964 
 
 853 
 
 _ 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 209-4 
 
 241 
 
 213-2 
 
 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total 
 
 123 
 
 991 
 
 1,088 
 
 350 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 67-1 
 
 253 
 
 272 
 
 175 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total ... 483 
 
 944 
 
 988 
 
 554 
 
 
 Per hour ... 241-5 236 
 
 247 277 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total ... 458 1,021 
 
 973 327 
 
 
 Per hour ... 229 255 '2 
 
 243-2 163-5 
 
 No. 14 
 
 Total ... 885 
 
 783 478 
 
 
 Per hour ... 221 '2 
 
 195-7 239 
 
 Average ... 
 
 186-7 
 
 241-3 
 
 234-2 
 
 213-6 
 
 Nov. 30 (Tuesday). 
 
 No. 8 Total ... . 1,051 
 
 903 400 
 
 
 Per hour ... 1 
 
 262-7 
 
 230-5 
 
 200 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total 
 
 313 
 
 74G 
 
 918 
 
 400 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 163 
 
 186-5 
 
 229-5 
 
 200 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total 
 
 433 
 
 1,074 
 
 919 
 
 521 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 225-9 
 
 268-5 
 
 229-7 
 
 260-5 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total 
 
 438. 
 
 1,184 
 
 960 
 
 321 
 
 Per hour 
 
 219 
 
 296 240 
 
 160-5 
 
 No. 14 : Total 
 
 
 
 911 1,058 
 
 411 
 
 Per hour 
 
 
 
 227-7 
 
 264-5 
 
 205-5 
 
 No. 13 Total 
 
 277 
 
 938 
 
 843 
 
 504 
 
 Per hour 
 
 138-5 
 
 234-5 
 
 240-8 
 
 302-4 
 
 Average ... 
 
 
 
 186-6 
 
 245-9 
 
 239-1 
 
 221-4 
 
 Bad yarn was supplied. Figures omitted from averages before and after breakfast. 
 
 7312 
 
26 
 
 Worker's 
 Number. 
 
 fi 8 
 
 X 30 1 9 -',0 
 
 1 30 
 
 5 30 
 
 68. 
 
 O O. 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 Dec. 1 (Wednesday). 
 
 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 Bobbins. 
 
 No. 8 
 
 Total 
 
 ass 
 
 1,248 
 
 1,144 
 
 375 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 211-6 
 
 312 
 
 286 
 
 195-6 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total 
 
 430 
 
 766 
 
 628 
 
 258 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 224-3 
 
 191-5 
 
 157 
 
 140-7 
 
 No. 10... 
 
 Total 
 
 412 
 
 1,043 
 
 1,058 
 
 516 
 
 
 Per hour. 
 
 214-9 
 
 260-7 
 
 264-5 
 
 269-2 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total 
 
 542 
 
 897 955 
 
 462 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 282-7 
 
 224-2 238-7 
 
 241 
 
 No. 14 
 
 Total 
 
 387 
 
 861 1,029 
 
 419 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 221-1 
 
 215-2 257 
 
 209-5 
 
 No. 13 
 
 Total 
 
 361 841 
 
 1,030 
 
 372 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 216-6 210- -2 
 
 257-5 
 
 186 
 
 Average ... ' 
 
 228-5 235-6 
 
 243-5 
 
 207 
 
 
 
 
 
 Dec. 2 (Thursday). 
 
 No. 8 
 
 Total 
 
 429 
 
 1,191 
 
 1,146 
 
 406 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 245 
 
 297-7 
 
 286-5 
 
 221-4 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total 
 
 469 
 
 683 
 
 756 
 
 290 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 234-5 
 
 170-7 
 
 189 
 
 158-1 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total 
 
 592 
 
 1,001 
 
 1,056 
 
 565 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 296 
 
 250-2 
 
 264 
 
 308-1 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total 
 
 476 
 
 1,103 
 
 1,017 
 
 466 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 238 
 
 275-7 
 
 254-2 
 
 233 
 
 No. 14 
 
 Total 
 
 436 
 
 1,188 
 
 917 
 
 603 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 249-1 
 
 297 
 
 229-2 
 
 301-5 
 
 No. 13 
 
 Total 
 
 379 
 
 1,073 
 
 1,125 
 
 384 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 206-7 
 
 268-2 
 
 281-2 
 
 192 
 
 Average ... 
 
 ,, 
 
 244-8 
 
 259-9 
 
 250-6 
 
 235-6 
 
 
 
 
 ! 
 
 
 Dec. 3 (Friday). 
 
 No. 8 
 
 Total 
 
 375 
 
 1.022 
 
 1,030 
 
 516 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 204-5 
 
 255-5 
 
 257-5 
 
 269-2 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total 
 
 353 
 
 798 
 
 908 
 
 249 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 176-5 
 
 199-5 
 
 227 
 
 124-5 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total 
 
 413 
 
 899 
 
 1,107 
 
 532 
 
 
 Per horn- 
 
 206-5 
 
 224-7 
 
 276-7 
 
 277-5 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total 
 
 434 
 
 1,066 
 
 917 
 
 373 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 217 
 
 266-5 
 
 229-2 
 
 186 -5 
 
 No. 14 
 
 Total 
 
 564 
 
 928 
 
 858 
 
 266 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 307-6 
 
 232 
 
 214-5 
 
 133 
 
 No. 13 
 
 Total 
 
 491 
 
 915 
 
 921 
 
 358 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 267 -S 
 
 228-7 
 
 230-2 
 
 379 
 
 Average ... 
 
 ,? 
 
 229-9 
 
 234-5 
 
 239-2 
 
 194-9 
 
 Dec. 4 (Saturday), 
 
 
 
 Special Overtime, 1-4.50 p.m. 
 
 No. 8 
 
 Total 
 
 2'.) 7 
 
 852 
 
 . 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 148-5 
 
 309-8 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 9 
 
 Total 
 
 257 
 
 77.", 
 
 587 
 
 
 
 
 'Per hour 
 
 128-5 
 
 331-2 
 
 153-1 
 
 
 
 No. 10 
 
 Total 
 
 573 
 
 S73 
 
 870 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 286-5 
 
 374-1 
 
 226-9 
 
 
 
 No. 12 
 
 Total 
 
 688 
 
 863 ' 
 
 989 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 344 
 
 369-8 
 
 258 
 
 
 
 No. 14 
 
 Total 
 
 Absent 
 
 823 
 
 Absent 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 
 
 352-7 
 
 
 
 
 
 No. 13 
 
 Total 
 
 352 564 
 
 895 
 
 
 
 
 Per hour 
 
 183-6 241-7 
 
 233-5 
 
 
 
 Average ... ., ... 218'2 
 
 329-8 217-9 
 
 
 
11 
 
 Explanation of the Results. 
 See Charts Nos. 11 and 12. 
 
 The figures employed in the construction of the curves are expressed in terms 
 of bobbins wound per hour. The different winders have been distinguished by a 
 difference of marking. The average curve is inserted in red. 
 
 The number of bobbins wound per hour is indicated on the vertical line to the left 
 of the figure. The days are indicated on the base-line. 
 
 Periods of overtime are indicated by black squares. 
 
 Taking the first day, Monday, No. 8 Winder was working at the rate of about 
 121 bobbins per hour from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. From 8.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m. she increased 
 the number to 150 per hour, from 1.30 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. to 162 per hour. This rate 
 she was able to keep up also through the two hours of overtime, the reason possibly 
 being that she was winding slowly all day, and therefore was not unduly fatigued. 
 
 No. 9 Winder started work slowly, and during the before-breakfast period only 
 averaged 85 bobbins per hour. During the next period, 8.30 to 12,30, the rate 
 increased largely (to about 249), and was maintained in the afternoon. In the over- 
 time period the rate fell to 103. 
 
 With No. 10 Winder a somewhat similar result was obtained. The first period 
 gave 166; the second, 275; the third, 234; and overtime, 186. 
 
 In the case of No. 12, the first period gave a high value, viz., 293; the second, 
 239 ; the third, 252 ; whilst in the overtime period the number fell to 216. 
 
 On the Tuesday, No. 8 Winder commenced with an output of 188 bobbins 
 per hour, dropping steeply to 105 during the second period. From 1.30 p.m. to 
 5.30 p.m. she worked at the rate of 211. During the overtime period she was absent. 
 
 No. 9 Winder commenced badly at 127, the number rose to 202 in the morning 
 period, rose to 230 in the afternoon, and fell in the overtime period to 176. 
 
 No. 10 started badly at 140, rose steeply to 258, and then fell to 214. In 
 the overtime period the number was 148. 
 
 No. 12 started at 236. This fell to 227 in the morning period, and rose to 292 
 in the afternoon; in the overtime period she was absent. 
 
 On Thursday, No. 8 commenced at 152, rose to 217. almost maintained this level 
 for the afternoon (213), and dropped to 164 in the overtime period. 
 
 No. 9 commenced at 97, a very low figure, rose to 254, dropping to 190 and 174 
 during the afternoon and overtime periods respectively. 
 
 No. 10 commenced at 204, rose to 251, and fell again to 247 and 155 in the 
 last two periods of the day. 
 
 No. 12 commenced at 221, rose to 257, and fell to 246 and 196 in the last two 
 periods. 
 
 Saturday was a half -day, but the figures are of interest : 
 No. 8, 207 in the early period, 341 in morning. 
 No. 9, 226 298 
 No. 10, 284 312 
 No. 12, 259 261 
 
 Most of the figures on Saturday were high. This may have been owing to 
 the anticipation of the week-end rest. There is generally an effort made on 
 Saturday to clear up all material on the machine in order to facilitate the weekly 
 cleaning. 
 
 The averages come out as follows (see Chart No. 11) : 
 In the first Curve (Monday) 
 
 6 am. -8 a.m.... ... 166 
 
 8.30 a.m.-12.30 p.m. 228 
 
 1.30 p.m.-5.30 p.m 225 
 
 6 p.m. -8 p.m. (Overtime) ... ... ... ... 167 
 
 In the second Curve (Tuesday) the average gives 
 
 6 a.m. -8 a.m. 172 
 
 8.30 a.m.-12-30 p.m ... 198 
 
 1.30 p.nu-5.30 p.m. ... ... 242 
 
 6-8 p.m., overtime .... 162 
 
 7312 D 2 
 
28 
 
 In the third Curve (Thursday) the averages are : 
 
 6 a.m. -8 a.m. 168 
 
 8.30 a,m.-12-30 p.m 245 
 
 1.30 p.m.-5.30 p.m. ... 224 
 
 6-8 p.m., overtime ... ... ... ... ... 172 
 
 in the fourth Curve (Friday) the averages are : 
 
 6 a.m.-8 a.m. 240 
 
 8.30 a.m.-12.30 p.m. 278 
 
 1.30 p.m.-5.30 p.m. ... 245 
 
 6-8 p.m., overtime ... ... 231 
 
 In the fifth Curve (Saturday) the averages are : 
 
 6 a.m.-8 a.m. 244 
 
 8.30 a.m.-12.30 p.m. 303 
 
 In the second week the conditions are similar. On the Monday- 
 No. 8 commenced at the rate of 209 rising to 241 in the morning, and dropped 
 to 213 in the afternoon. She was absent during the overtime period. 
 
 No. 9 commenced very slowly, showing a figure of 67 only. This rose to 253 
 in the morning, and to 272 in the afternoon. During overtime it fell to 175. 
 
 No. 10 started well at 242, but fell away during the morning to 236, rising 
 during afternoon to 247, and an unusual occurrence during overtime to 277. 
 
 No. 12 also started well with a rate of 229, rose to 255 in the morning, fell to 
 244 in the afternoon, and dropped to a low level 163 during overtime. 
 
 Two additional individuals were examined during this week, and the 
 results are given, but since they were not examined during the first week, 
 and since, moreover, they were irregular in their attendance, the values obtained 
 have not been taken into account in calculating the average (green). They are 
 included in the red curve. (Chart No. 12.) 
 
 On Monday No. 14 was absent during the early morning period. She showed 
 rates of 221 in the morning, 195 in the afternoon, and 239 during overtime. 
 
 No. 13 was absent all day. 
 
 On the Tuesday No. 8 was absent during the first period. During the second 
 period she worked at the rate of 263 bobbins per hour, during the afternoon at 230, 
 and during the overtime at 200. 
 
 No. 9 commenced badly again (164), though considerably better than on Monday. 
 
 During the morning she rose to 186, and during the afternoon to 230. Overtime 
 produced less effect than usual, the rate standing at 210. 
 
 No. 10 commenced well with 225, rose sharply to 268, fell during the afternoon 
 to 230, and, as on Monday, rose to 260 during overtime. 
 
 No. 12 commenced at 220, rose to 295 during the morning, and fell sharply 
 to 240 in the afternoon, and to 160 during overtime. 
 
 No. 14 commenced work at 8.30 with a rate of 228. This rose in the afternoon 
 to 264, and fell in overtime to 205. 
 
 No. 13 began early at 138, rose in the morning to 234 and to 241 in the afternoon, 
 and rose still further to 302 in overtime. 
 
 On the Wednesday No. 8 commenced with 212, and rose to 310 during the 
 morning, falling to 286 in the afternoon and to 196 in overtime. 
 
 No. 9 commenced more rapidly than on either of the previous days, winding 
 at the rate of 224 bobbins per hour. This rate fell rapidly to 191 during the morn- 
 ing, to 157 in the afternoon, and to 140 during overtime. 
 
 The fall in output during the day is represented by a line which is almost 
 straight. 
 
 No. 10 commenced at 157, rose sharply to 260, and during the afternoon and 
 overtime rather more than maintained this rate, giving figures of 265 and 270 for 
 these two periods. 
 
 No. 12 commenced very well with an output of 283, which, however, dropped to 
 225 during the morning. The afternoon and overtime show 239 and 241 respectively. 
 
 Nos. 14 and 13 showed changes of rate which were remarkably similar. They 
 commenced at 221 and 217, dropped to 215 and 210. and rose to 257 'in the afternoon. 
 In overtime they dropped to 209 and 186. 
 
 On Thursday the general average is distinctly higher than on previous days. 
 The figures are as follows : 
 
 No. 8 started at 245, rose to 298 in the morning, dropped slightly to 287 in the 
 afternoon, and to 222 in the overtime period. 
 
29 
 
 No. 9 started fairly well at 235, but fell sharply to 170 in the morning. In the 
 afternoon her rate was 189, and during overtime 158. 
 
 No. 10 commenced very well at 295, dropped to 250 in the morning, rising again 
 to 264 in the afternoon, and to 308 in the overtime. This is a curious inverted curve, 
 for which at present I have found no explanation. 
 
 No. 12 commenced with a rate of 238, rose to 275, and dropped during the after- 
 noon to 255. During overtime the rate was 233. 
 
 No. 14 commenced at 249, rose to 297, dropped to 229 in the afternoon, and in 
 the overtime period rose again to 301. 
 
 No. 13 commenced at 207, rose to 268 in the morning and to 281 in the afternoon. 
 In overtime the rate dropped to 192. 
 
 On Friday the general form of the earlier curves is preserved. 
 
 No. 8 commenced at 205, rose to 255 in the morning and to 258 in the afternoon. 
 During overtime the rate was 269. 
 
 No. 9 had returned to the form of curve shown at the beginning of the week. 
 The value for the early period was 176, for the morning 199, for the afternoon 227, 
 and for overtime 125. 
 
 No. 10 shows for the early period, 206, which rises to 225 in the morning, and 
 again in the afternoon to 277 ; a value which is retained during overtime. 
 
 No. 12 begins with a value of 217, which rises steeply to 267 in the morning 
 and falls to 230 in the afternoon. The overtime value is 187. 
 
 No. 14, like No. 12 and No. 10, began with a high rate, 307. This dropped 
 to 232 and 214 during the mid-day periods. In overtime it fell further to 133. 
 
 No. 13 began at 268, dropped to 229 and 230 in the mid-day periods, and to 
 179 in overtime. 
 
 On Saturday, which is a half-day, the curve is naturally of a different form. 
 No. 8 began with an output of 249, rose to 309 in the morning, and was absent 
 for the rest of the day. 
 
 No. 9 started badly with an output of- 129, which rose to 330 during the morning, 
 and fell to 153 in the overtime period. 
 
 No. 10 commenced winding rapidly 287 per hour, increased her rate to the 
 highest value seen in the whole week during the morning, when her figures were 374, 
 and dropped during overtime to 227. 
 
 No. 12 shows the highest value for the week for the early period, having a rate 
 of 344, which rises to 369 in the morning, and falls to 258 during overtime. 
 
 No. 14 was absent from the early morning work and also from the special over- 
 time in the afternoon. During the morning her rate was 353. 
 
 No. 13 began at 184, and rose to 242. In the special overtime her rate was 233. 
 The averages give the following results. (See Chart No. 12) : 
 
 
 
 
 Average of 3 only 
 
 
 
 Average of all 
 
 (Nos. 9, 10, 12), 
 
 Day. 
 
 Time. 
 
 Workers. 
 
 who were present for 
 
 
 
 (Red curve.) 
 
 the whole week. 
 
 
 
 (Green curve.) 
 
 Monday, November 2IHh 
 
 G 8 a.m. ... 
 
 187 
 
 179 
 
 
 8.3012.30 
 
 2-11 
 
 248 
 
 
 1.305.30 
 
 234 
 
 254 
 
 
 6 8 Overtime 
 
 214 
 
 205 
 
 Tuesday, November 30th 
 
 6 8 a.m 
 
 187 
 
 203 
 
 
 8.3012.30 
 
 246 
 
 248 
 
 
 1.305.30 
 
 239 
 
 234 
 
 
 6 8 Overtime 
 
 221 
 
 217 
 
 Wednesday, December let 
 
 6 8 a.m 
 
 228 
 
 240 
 
 
 8.3012.30 
 
 236 
 
 225 
 
 
 1.305.30 
 
 243 
 
 220 
 
 
 68 Overtime 
 
 207 
 
 216 
 
 Thnreday, December 2nd 
 
 6 8a.m. ... 
 
 245 
 
 256 
 
 
 8.3012.30 
 
 260 232 
 
 
 1.305.30 
 
 251 235 
 
 
 6 8 Overtime 
 
 236 
 
 227 
 
30 
 
 Day. 
 
 Time. 
 
 Average of all 
 Workers. 
 (Red curve.) 
 
 Average of 3 only 
 (Nos. 9, 10, 12), 
 who were present for 
 the whole week. 
 (Green curve.) 
 
 Friday, December 3rd 
 
 6 8 a.m 
 8.3012.30 
 1.305.30 
 6 8 Overtime 
 
 230 
 235 
 239 
 195 
 
 200 
 
 230 
 
 244 
 196 
 
 Saturday, December 4th 
 
 6 8a.m. ... 
 8.3011.15 
 14.50 
 
 219 
 229 
 218 
 
 253 
 
 258 
 207 
 
 The curves of both weeks (Charts 11 and 12) show indications of a similar 
 alteration from day to day of the values for the early morning and overtime output. 
 This alteration, indefinite in the first week and well marked in the second, shows 
 that, whilst at the beginning of the week output was lowest during the early morn- 
 ing period, as the week progressed output during the early morning period improved, 
 whilst, especially towards the end of the week, it declined during overtime. On 
 Thursday, Friday, Saturday the lowest output is found during overtime. 
 
 Two processes appear to be at work, one, the improvement of output during 
 early morning period as " Monday's effect " wears off, and the other, the decline of 
 output during the overtime period as the week's fatigue becomes operative. 
 
 On Saturday 4th December, the average for the early morning period is seen to be 
 normal. During the middle day period the output was higher than at any other 
 period in the week. According to the usual Saturday custom work ceases at 12.30 
 p.m., but on this particular day a special overtime period was introduced in order 
 to make up arrears. The period was from 1 p.m. to 4.50 p.m. and the output is 
 seen to have been unequal to that of any dther middle day period, reaching only to 
 the 217 mark. Probably the workers were already tired by their week's work, and 
 unable to stand the strain of an extra overtime period, even though this came at the 
 end of a half day, and was worked in the afternoon. 
 
 An examination of the first curve of output (Winders, week ending 27th 
 November) shows that the average output for the early morning period is slightly 
 lower on Monday than on Tuesday or on Thursday. In the week ending 4th 
 December, the early morning output, taking the average of 3 Winders, is low on 
 Monday, 179, and becomes progressively higher on the next four days, attaining 
 the rate of 265 on the Friday. On Saturday the rate dropped to 253. A similar 
 tendency is to be seen in the Curve of Output, Lint packers, week ending llth 
 December, and in the Curve of Output of Boracic Packers, week ending llth 
 December. On Monday in the week ending 18th December the Boracic Packers 
 Curve is incomplete. The process referred to is sufficiently definite to call for 
 explanation. It tends more towards a rise on certain days of the week of the early 
 morning output above Monday's result, than towards a progressive rise as the week 
 goes on, though this latter is indicated in one of the curves. The phenomenon 
 appears to be due to the lack of efficiency which is ordinarily encountered on 
 Monday morning, and which tends to diminish output. The generally unsatis- 
 factory nature of the early morning output is probably due to fatigue, discomfort, 
 and, in some cases, to lack of food. These things are due indirectly to the working 
 of overtime. (See pp. 35, 41-42.) Their influence would be felt more strongly on 
 Monday morning, when it would be difficult to get into harness owing to the liberty 
 enjoyed on Sunday. Later in the week the influence of Sunday's liberty would be 
 weaker, work would be resumed with less effort, and output would rise accordingly. 
 
 In the Curve of Output, Winders, week ending 4th December, the average curve 
 of the three workers, Nos. 9, 10, 12, drawn in green, shows an early morning output 
 on Wednesday and Thursday that is actually greater than the output for the middle 
 periods of the day, although when the average curve for all of the workers, drawn 
 in red, is taken this does not occur. The result is brought about by the 
 abnormally high output of one or of several workers during this period, 
 the effect being due to different individuals on different days. For instance, on 
 Wednesday, No. 12 shows a very high output (283) although the other members are 
 grouped about the 215 line, and the average of all workers present was 227. On 
 
SI 
 
 Thursday it is No. 10 who shows a high early morning output of 296, four of the others 
 being grouped about the 240 line. On Friday, two workers out of the six showed 
 high early morning outputs, one of them No. 14 actually starting at a rate 308 
 that is only reached on two other occasions during the week, except on the short day, 
 Saturday. The reasons for these irregularities are at present obscure. 
 
 In the Curve of Output, Lint Packers, Chart No. 13, that of Friday (December 
 10th) differs from that of Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday in the diminished 
 value shown for the period 8.30 a.m.-12.30 p.m., and closer inspection shows that 
 this is due to the unsatisfactory output of a single worker, No. 33. There was no 
 apparent reason for this loss of efficiency, but it should be noted that, although 
 starting with the others on Saturday morning and maintaining the output fairly 
 well for the 8.30 a.m. -12.30 p.m. period, this worker was unable to last to the end 
 of even the short Saturday's task, but did very badly during the overtime period, 
 falling to a low level whilst the other members of the group were increasing their 
 output. The same worker shows an unsatisfactory output for the early morning 
 period on Wednesday, 8th December, so that the injurious influence appears to 
 have been acting in her case during nearly the whole of this week. That the cause, 
 whatever its nature, was purely temporary is shown by the fact that in the following 
 week her output was quite satisfactory and on most of the days followed that of 
 the other members of the group, whilst on the Tuesday, December 14th, during th'e 
 8.30 a.m. -12.30 p.m. period, it was distinctly above the average. 
 
 Instances of individual oscillations, due, it may be, to similar influences are 
 to be found also in the records for the week ending December 18th, 1915, where the 
 worker, No. 35, did only fairly well (on Tuesday), or badly (on Wednesday) in the 
 period 8.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m.. and conspicuously badly in the period of overtime on 
 Tuesday, whilst the worker, No. 34, did particularly well in the 8.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m. 
 period on Wednesday. As a rule, the curves of these three workers follow each 
 other with remarkable constancy. This may be accounted for by tEe fact that 
 there appears to be some sort of agreement amongst them to turn out approximately 
 similar quantities per diem. There is thus a kind of averaging process at work, 
 which however, does not interfere with the interest of the results in their relation to 
 the different periods of the day. Moreover, the irregularities above-mentioned 
 show that the averaging process ceases to act as soon as the efficiency of any par- 
 ticular individual fluctuates (Chart No. 14). 
 
 The phenomena can perhaps be referred to the group of variations of output 
 the causes of which are obscure but are to be sought in the private life of the indi- 
 vidual rather than in his environment at the mill. A fractious child, leading to 
 loss of sleep, has been traced as the cause of unsatisfactory work in one case. Want 
 of food was apparently the cause in another. 
 
 Saturday's curve is more easily explained, as the workers started with the inteni.ion 
 of clearing the machines. The early morning output is fair, the midday output is 
 excellent, but fell off very rapidly during overtime (which only lasted till 4.50) in 
 consequence of the week's accumulation of fatigue. The same cause is probably 
 responsible for the sudden fall in the overtime output of Friday. 
 
 The outstanding feature of the curves is the demonstration they afford of the 
 presence in each day of two periods during which the output is small (6-8 in the 
 morning and 6-8 in the evening), and two periods during which the output is larger. 
 Taking the average of the two low output periods in the first tAvo days, the figure 
 obtained is 166'35 bobbins per hour, whilst if the average of the two higher output 
 periods of the same days is taken, we get the figure 223'27, a difference of no less 
 than 56'50 bobbins per hour, or 678 bobbins (three and a third doffings) per day. 
 
 Conclusions formed as a result of an examination of workers in the winding 
 room are confirmed when those in other departments are tested. In the case of 
 women engaged in weighing and packing surgical lint, the values are expressed in 
 pounds wound per hour. The hours of labour are similar to those in the winding 
 room, the details being as follows : 
 
32 
 
 LINT PACKERS AND BORACIC LINT PACKERS 
 Details of Work and Overtime. 
 
 Lint Packers. 
 
 'Die lint packers work four periods in the day, viz. : 
 6 a.m. -8 a.m. 
 8,30 a.m.-12.30 p.m. 
 1.30 p.m.-5.30 p.m. 
 6 p.m. -8 p.m., overtime. 
 
 On Saturdays they work overtime from 1 p.m. till 5 p.m. ; actual rolling of lint 
 is finished at 4.30 p.m., after which the benches are cleared. 
 The lint packers are paid a daily wage. 
 
 Their duties are to fetch the lint which has been folded in the next room, roll 
 it up roughly into a bundle, at the same time picking out any foreign matter or 
 splinters of wood, and weigh it, each pound as it is weighed being cut off from the 
 main piece. The material is only loosely rolled as it passes next to a special machine 
 to be rolled tightly before being finally packed. 
 
 Borucic Lint Packers. 
 
 The boracic lint packers work three periods only in the day, viz. : 
 
 6 a.m. -8 a.m. 
 
 8.30 a.m.-12.30 p.m. 
 
 1.30 p.m. -5.30 p.m. 
 No overtime is worked. 
 The workers are pai d by time. 
 
 Their duties are .to convey the material (boracic lint) from the far end of the 
 room to their benches. This they do by drawing it along the floor in skeps. It is 
 then wound tightly round an iron rod, the rod is withdrawn and the roll weighed. 
 Each pound as it is weighed is cut off from the remainder. Any deposit from the 
 solution which has dried on the lint has to be removed, and, as the material is 
 smooth and very slippery to handle, this often takes time. Removal of foreign 
 material is more difficult from the boracic lint than from the ordinary lint; 
 it has to be scraped and brushed out, whereas with ordinary lint it is simply picked 
 off. Moreover, the boracic lint is rolled by the worker much more tightly than the 
 ordinary lint and is packed immediately, whereas the ordinary lint is rolled for 
 packing by a machine. 
 
 Thus, although the work of the two sets of individuals is similar and may be 
 compared, the actual output of the boracic lint packers is uniformly smaller than 
 that of the ordinary lint packers. 
 
 DATA OF OUTPUT. 
 Lint Packers December, 1915. 
 Pounds of Lint Rolled per Hour. 
 
 Number. 
 
 Tuesday, 7th. 
 
 Wednesday, 8th. 
 
 Thursday, 9th. 
 
 Friday, 10th. 
 
 Saturday, llth. 
 
 31 
 
 3012.30. 
 
 i 
 
 a I 
 
 cc 
 
 06 
 
 <C 
 
 *i 
 
 +4 
 
 ; 
 
 
 i i 
 
 o 
 
 CO 
 
 & 
 
 :f 
 4 
 
 t 
 
 V 
 
 JJJ 
 
 *** eo 
 
 3012.30. 
 
 P.M. 
 
 .305.30 
 
 CO 
 
 
 
 *1 
 
 4 
 
 o 
 ec 
 
 <N 
 
 T 1 
 g 
 
 P.M. 
 .305.30. 
 
 CO 
 
 4i 
 44 
 
 
 CO 
 
 cs 
 
 I 
 
 CO 
 
 P.M. 
 .805.30. 
 
 
 
 CO 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 00 
 
 1-1 
 
 
 
 co 
 
 
 
 
 CO 
 
 
 
 
 CO 
 
 ^^ 
 
 No. 33 
 
 73-0 
 
 86.3 
 
 79-1 
 
 64-0 
 
 62-6 
 
 85-8 
 
 76-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 72-0 
 
 78-6 
 
 78-8 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-0 
 
 61-8 
 
 78-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 75-1 
 
 88-0 
 
 66-6 
 
 No. 34 ... 
 
 73-0 
 
 86-3 
 
 76-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 75-1 
 
 84-2 
 
 81-7 
 
 55-0 
 
 77-5 
 
 80-6 
 
 81-7 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-0 
 
 81-1 
 
 81-7 
 
 57-1 
 
 74-0 
 
 94-2 
 
 96-6 
 
 No. 35 ... 
 
 73-0 
 
 86-3 
 
 78-6 
 
 61-0 
 
 77-7 
 
 85-3 
 
 79-9 
 
 57-1 
 
 74-0 
 
 81-1 
 
 81-7 
 
 64-0 
 
 74-0 
 
 85-8 
 
 78-6 
 
 BT't 
 
 73-0 
 
 96-0 
 
 98-6 
 
 Average 
 
 73-0 
 
 86-3 
 
 78-1 
 
 64-0 
 
 71-8 
 
 85-1 
 
 79-4 
 
 58-7 
 
 74-5 
 
 80-1 
 
 80-7 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-3 
 
 76-2 
 
 79-6 
 
 59-4 
 
 74-0 
 
 92-7 
 
 87-2 
 
 N.B. 1. The times represent the periods of the day, and are not the actual hours 
 
 worked by individuals. 
 2. The figures give pounds of lint rolled per hour. 
 
DATA OF OUTPUT. 
 Lint Packers December, 1915. 
 Pounds of Lint Rolled per Hour. 
 
 
 Monday, 13th. 
 
 Tuesday, 14th. 
 
 Wednesday, 15th. 
 
 Thursday, 16th. 
 
 Friday. 17th. 
 
 Rat., 18th. 
 
 Number. 
 
 
 ' 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 
 M - ^ 
 
 s? 
 
 
 7 | 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 
 ^ 1 
 
 
 *~'\ 7 s I 
 
 
 yJ \ 
 
 
 
 s'? T 
 
 33 ? 
 
 1 K ' 
 
 
 <-i 
 
 1 
 
 
 1 
 
 - 
 
 * . 1 
 
 1 
 
 s; 4 
 
 4 
 
 4 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 .] 1 
 
 = 
 
 ^ 
 
 <I 
 
 j, 
 
 pjj Li 
 
 < -^ 
 
 2 ^'S 
 
 
 
 
 
 *? 
 
 
 
 "= 
 
 *s 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 cc 
 
 
 - 
 
 
 
 r: 
 
 
 
 
 
 00 
 
 
 
 
 00 
 
 
 
 
 00 
 
 
 
 OD 
 
 
 
 
 cc ~ 
 
 
 
 No. 33 
 
 74-8 
 
 79-7 
 
 72-0 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-0 
 
 85-8 
 
 76-6 
 
 80-0 
 
 74-0 
 
 73-6 
 
 78-6 
 
 (H-0 
 
 72-0 
 
 81-1 
 
 76-fi 6t-0 
 
 73-0 
 
 81-1 
 
 64-a 
 
 fit-if 
 
 73-0 
 
 91-4 
 
 74-6 
 
 No. 34 
 
 74-0 
 
 81-0 
 
 76-6 
 
 64-2 
 
 73-0 
 
 77-1 
 
 76-6 
 
 80-0 
 
 74-0 
 
 8.V8 
 
 78-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 72-0 
 
 81-7 
 
 78-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-0 
 
 81-1 
 
 li (-3 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-0 90-8 
 
 74-6 
 
 No. 3.-, 
 
 73-0 
 
 81-3 
 
 76-6 
 
 66-2 
 
 73-0 
 
 76'G 
 
 79-7 
 
 57-1 
 
 73-0 
 
 71-6 
 
 78-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-0 
 
 81-7 
 
 76-f, 
 
 (14-d 
 
 70-9 
 
 81-7 
 
 63'9 
 
 IH-0 
 
 74-0 
 
 90-8 
 
 74-6 
 
 Average 
 
 73-9 
 
 80-6 
 
 75-0 
 
 64-8 
 
 73-0 
 
 79-8 
 
 77-6 
 
 72-3 
 
 73-6 
 
 78-6 
 
 78-6 
 
 64-0 
 
 72-3 
 
 81-.-) 
 
 77-2 
 
 64-0 
 
 72-3 
 
 81-3 
 
 64-1 
 
 64-0 
 
 73-3 
 
 91-0 
 
 746 
 
 N.B. 1. The times represent the periods of the day, and are not the actual hours 
 
 worked by individuals. 
 2. The figures give pounds of lint rolled per hour. 
 
 Summarising these results, the following figures are obtained : 
 In the week ending December llth the average output in Ibs. per hour for the 
 first three periods of the day was : 
 
 AVERAGE OF FIRST THREE PERIODS. 
 
 Tuesday ... 
 Wednesday 
 Thursday 
 Friday 
 
 79 
 
 78-6 
 78'5 
 763 
 
 The output for the overtime period for the same days was : 
 
 
 
 OVERTIME. 
 
 Tuesday 
 
 Wednesday 
 
 Thursday 
 
 Friday 
 
 In the week ending 18th December, some of the figures are as follows : 
 
 64 
 59 
 64 
 595 
 
 Monday 
 Tuesdaj* . . 
 Wednesday 
 Thursday .. 
 Friday 
 
 Average 
 
 for first three 
 
 periods. 
 
 76-5 
 77-16 
 75! -3 
 
 Overtime. 
 
 64 
 
 72-:$ 
 
 64 
 64 
 64 
 
 Comparing the output during the best period of the day with the output during 
 overtime, the figures are : 
 
 Week ending December llth. 
 
 
 
 Best period. 
 
 Overtime. 
 
 
 
 Tuesday ... 
 
 86-5 
 
 64 
 
 
 Wednesday 
 
 85 
 
 59 
 
 
 Thursday ... 
 
 80-5 
 
 64 
 
 
 
 Friday 
 
 79-5 
 
 59-5 
 
 
 731 -> 
 
Week ending December 18th. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 
 Tuesday ... 
 Wednesday 
 
 80-5 
 
 79-5 
 78-5 
 
 65 
 72 
 64 
 
 
 
 Thursday ... 
 
 81-5 
 
 64 
 
 
 
 Friday 
 
 81 
 
 64 
 
 
 The following table shows the average output for the early morning period 
 compared with that of the middle-day periods : 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average of all members 
 
 Average of all members 
 
 rkf tVl C* fr JTMl 11 frtl* tVlP 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 or trie (jrroup tor 
 middle periods of day. 
 
 OJ. Ml" VTi U (I VJ L\Jl 1 1J.C 
 
 early morning period. 
 
 
 
 Tuesday ... 
 
 
 
 
 82-2 
 
 73 
 
 
 
 Wednesday 
 
 
 ( 
 
 
 82-25 
 
 71-8 
 
 
 
 Thursday .. 
 
 
 
 
 80-4 
 
 74-o 
 
 
 
 Friday 
 
 
 
 
 77-8 
 
 73-3 
 
 
 
 Saturday ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 89-9 
 
 74 
 
 
 
 Monday 
 
 
 
 
 77-6 
 
 73-9 
 
 
 
 Tuesday ... 
 
 
 
 
 78-7 
 
 73 
 
 
 
 Wednesday 
 
 
 
 
 78-6 
 
 73-6 
 
 
 
 Thursday ... 
 
 
 
 
 79-3 
 
 - 72-3 
 
 
 
 Friday 
 
 
 . 
 
 
 72-7 
 
 72-3 
 
 
 
 Saturday . . . 
 
 
 
 
 82-8 
 
 73-3 
 
 
 Thus, the results of -the lint packers show that, as in the case of the winders, 
 there are two periods of the day the early morning and the overtime showing 
 a low output, and two periods the morning and the afternoon showing a higher 
 output. The general shape of the curve in the two cases is similar, though the 
 lessened output during overtime is more marked in the case of the lint packers. 
 
 Influences, therefore, are at work during the early morning and the late 
 evening which tend to diminish output, whilst these influences are absent, or less 
 active, during the remainder of the day. 
 
 Dealing first with the early morning period, it has been stated that this period 
 commences at 6 a.m. and continues till 8 a.m. Many of the workers live at some 
 distance from the mill (f mile, 2J miles, f mile, f mile) and in order to arrive at their 
 work by 6 a.m. and get some food before starting, they must rise soon after 5 o'clock. 
 In the evening they do not leave the mill till 8 p.m., they have then to get home, 
 take supper, and attend to any domestic matters. Most of them get to bed about 
 10 p.m. They are not very ready to get up in the morning, and naturally put ir 
 off to the latest possible moment. They arrive at their work in a hurry, uncom- 
 fortable, some of them unfed, possibly with wet feet and damp clothes. These 
 conditions are not conducive to good and rapid work. 
 
 In addition, a good deal of time is wasted* owing to late arrival at the mil].. 
 The figures given have been calculated on the actual number of minutes worked by 
 the different individuals. Had the whole period been taken, the output per hour 
 would have been less satisfactory. Yet it is upon the whole period that total 
 output must be calculated. 
 
 It may be asked, " What result would follow if the working day were to com- 
 mence at 8.30 instead of at 6 a.m. ? Would the unsatisfactory output be transferred 
 to the later period, or would it disappear ? " 
 
 There are indications that it would disappear. In several experiments members 
 of a group have commenced work sometimes at 6 a.m., sometimes at 8.30 a.m. The 
 
 * See pp. 41, 64, Loss of Time. 
 
35 
 
 uutput iii the latter case has always been more of the character of the later period 
 than of the earlier.* 
 
 The results of an experiment made to test the point directly are given in the 
 Table on p. 42. Work during the early morning period was suspended from 
 February 23rd till February 29th. The average output of eight winders was as 
 follows : 
 
 . 
 
 Weekly Average 
 for Early Morning 
 Period, 6-8. 
 
 Weekly Average 
 for Morning 
 Period, 8.30-12.30. 
 
 
 Week before early morning period suspended 
 Week during which early morning period suspended 
 
 261 
 
 275 
 316 
 
 Thus, so far from the unsatisfactory output of the early morning period being 
 transferred to the morning period, the average of this later period is largely 
 increased during the suspension of the early morning period. 
 
 The early morning period may be said to bear the same relation to the labour 
 of the day as Monday does to the labour of the week. In both cases a cessation of 
 work has produced a disinclination to recommence, to overcome which a distinct 
 effort on the part of the worker is demanded. In neither case can this be said to 
 be due to fatigue, since a rest interval has just occurred. . It is rather a loss of the 
 special co-ordination which resulted from the prolonged performance of a particular 
 set of actions, and which enabled the worker to carry them out more perfectly. Only 
 when the special co-ordination has been regained (temporarily) will the work be 
 performed once more with ease and celerity. 
 
 Familiar examples of such loss of co-ordination are to be found in knitting, 
 type- writing, &c., where quick and accurate work can only be performed after 
 practice. Practice is necessary at the commencement of every period of work, the 
 amount required depending on the duration of the preceding period of rest. 
 
 Turning to a consideration of output during overtime, it has been stated that 
 those who remain at the mill for overtime are provided with tea, cakes, scones, &c., 
 free of cost, and that they have a period of rest between 5.30 and 6 o'clock. It 
 might therefore be expected that, being fed and refreshed, they would commence 
 the period of overtime with renewed energy and work quickly and well. But the 
 output during this period is the least satisfactory of the whole day. 
 
 The reason is perhaps simpler than in the case of the early morning period, 
 and may be attributed principally to one cause, viz., fatigue. 
 
 In the first section of this Report, when dealing with fatigue production, the 
 results of fatigue were shown to be conspicuous on days on which overtime is 
 worked. In the class of work we are considering overtime is worked almost every 
 evening. As a result, fatigue is accumulated and makes its presence felt, especially 
 towards the end of the day. The statements of the workers themselves may be 
 quoted : 
 
 No. 9.. '' Present work does not suit her, as the hours are too long." 
 No. 10. " Finds work very trying, especially towards evening." 
 No. 12. " Finds work very tiring, especially the overtime." 
 
 Thus, the unsatisfactory character of output during both the early morning and 
 overtime periods alike is to be attributed to the evil effects of excessive fatigue 
 following upon the working of hours unduly long. 
 
 * In curve of Winders, week ending 4th December, No. 8 commenced work at 6 a.m. on 
 Monday, and at 8.30 a.m. on Tuesday. The rate of working was 209 bobbins per hour when she 
 l>egan at 6 a.m. It was 262 bobbins per hour when she began at 8.30. 
 
 Xo. 14 Winder commenced at 8.30 a.m. on Monday, her rate being 221. The average rate for the 
 group in the 0-8 period was 186. On Tuesday the same worker commenced again at 8.30, her rate 
 bring 227. The average rate for the group for the 6-8 period was 187. 
 
 In the Table of Output of Winders, general averages in bobbins per hour, p. 42, the weekly 
 averages for the early morning period for five weeks were as follows: 216, 253, 258, 261, 226. For 
 the morning period, 8.30-12.30 for the one week when early morning period was suspended the 
 average was 316. 
 
 7312 E 2 
 
DATA OF OUTPUT. 
 
 Boracic Lint Packers December, 1915. 
 Pounds of Boracic Lint rolled per hour. 
 
 Nunibur. 
 
 Tuesday 7th. 
 
 Weduesduy. 8cu. 
 
 Thursday, 9th. 
 
 Friday, luth. 
 
 Saturday, llth. 
 
 31 
 
 o 
 
 M 
 
 oi 
 
 7 
 
 o 
 
 GO 
 
 o 
 cc 
 
 ?1 
 
 31 
 
 o 
 ?c 
 <M' 
 
 o 
 jg 
 
 GO' 
 
 i. 
 
 'I 
 
 ~- 'i> 
 
 3] 
 
 o 
 y? 
 ?i 
 
 5 
 
 QD 
 
 o 
 * 
 
 =n 
 "5 
 
 ~ 
 
 3] 
 
 o 
 
 <M' 
 
 T 
 a5 
 
 00 
 
 CC 
 
 tl 
 
 cc 
 
 3^ 
 
 31 
 
 o 
 
 CO 
 GO 
 
 No. 37 ... 
 
 35-0 
 
 17-0 
 
 *6'0 
 
 4.VO 
 
 47-5 
 
 42-3 
 
 45-0 
 
 48-7 
 
 47-1 
 
 44-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 37-3 
 
 32-5 
 
 50-7 
 
 No. 38 ... 
 
 27-5 
 
 68-a 
 
 41-0 
 
 40-0 
 
 48-2 
 
 40-0 
 
 45-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 45-7 
 
 15-0 
 
 49-5 
 
 37-3 
 
 Abs 
 
 ent. 
 
 No. 39 ... 
 
 37-5 
 
 42-5 
 
 52 ' 5 
 
 45-0 
 
 47-8 
 
 42-3 
 
 45-0 
 
 47-5 
 
 48-5 
 
 40-0 
 
 42-5 
 
 50-0 
 
 35-0 
 
 44-4 
 
 No. 40 ... 
 
 45-0 
 
 50 '0 
 
 56 '6 
 
 45-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 56 6 
 
 
 Absent 
 
 
 45-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 47-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 No. 36 ... 
 
 37-5 
 
 40-0 
 
 37-7 
 
 45-0 
 
 in -2 
 
 50-0 
 
 lu-0 
 
 17-5 
 
 50-0 
 
 37-5 
 
 4.VO 
 
 10-0 
 
 27-5 
 
 44-4 
 
 Average 
 
 36-J 
 
 46-5 
 
 4(i-7 
 
 45-2 
 
 47-9 
 
 46'3 
 
 43-7 
 
 18-4 
 
 47-8 
 
 42-3 
 
 47-4 
 
 4.9 
 
 35 Mi 
 
 44-2 
 
 N.B. 1. The times given represent the periods of the day and are not the actual 
 
 hours worked by individuals. 
 2. Output is expressed in Ibs. rolled per hour. 
 
 DATA OF OUTPUT. 
 
 lionicic Lint Pucki'rx. 
 (Week Ending 18t/i December, 1915.) 
 
 IN umber. 
 
 M' nday, 
 
 Tut 
 
 sday. 14th. 
 
 g 
 
 ^. ere 
 
 I H 
 
 Wedi 
 
 31 
 
 icsday, 15th. 
 
 Thursday, 16th. 
 
 Friday, 17th. 
 
 Saturday, 
 18th. 
 
 Jl 
 
 !' 
 
 7 
 
 o 
 
 i *i 
 
 3l 
 
 \ 
 
 m m . 
 
 31 
 
 T-i 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 31 
 
 * 
 
 n 
 
 7 
 
 
 
 CO 
 
 
 -Sj 
 
 
 
 GO "" 
 
 
 co - " 
 
 
 CO 
 
 
 
 00 
 
 No. 37 
 
 48-0 
 
 36-0 
 
 37-5 
 
 50-0 
 
 43-8 
 
 43-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 41-n 
 
 45-0 
 
 43-7 
 
 42-5 
 
 44-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 40-5 
 
 45-0 
 
 48-8 
 
 No. 38 
 
 46-0 
 
 38-6 
 
 42-5 
 
 50-0 
 
 41-2 
 
 47-.-, 
 
 5H-II 
 
 37-5 
 
 47-:, 
 
 17-5 
 
 41'ls 
 
 45-0 
 
 50-0 
 
 40-0 
 
 47-5 
 
 46-6 
 
 No. 39 
 
 42-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 43-7 
 
 50-0 
 
 45-0 
 
 45-0 
 
 45-0 
 
 40-0 
 
 45-0 
 
 47-5 
 
 45-0 
 
 47-5 
 
 42-5 
 
 50-0 
 
 44-4 
 
 No. 40 
 
 45-0 
 
 2H-7 
 
 47-5 
 
 52-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 4.VO 
 
 48-0 
 
 41-2 
 
 42-5 
 
 fiff-0 
 
 42-5 
 
 )5-0 
 
 50 ' 
 
 40-0 
 
 45-0 
 
 48-8 
 
 No. 36 
 
 45-0 
 
 37-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 4.! -7 
 
 37-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 50-0 
 
 Xot 
 
 37-5 
 
 37-5 
 
 43-7 
 
 Absent 
 
 40-0 
 
 47-5 
 
 40'0 
 
 44-4 
 
 Average 
 
 45-3 
 
 35-2 
 
 40-5 
 
 47-9 
 
 42-5 
 
 43-G 
 
 48-6 
 
 41-1 
 
 42-5 
 
 45 '7 
 
 43'4 
 
 44-7 
 
 47-5 
 
 42-1 
 
 45'5 
 
 46-6 
 
 N.B. 1. The times given represent the periods of the clay and are not the actual 
 
 hours worked by individuals. 
 2. Output is expressed in Ibs. rolled per hour. 
 
 Amongst the Boracic Lint Packers, where no overtime is worked (see p. 32), 
 the output for different periods of the day is more equal. The figures for the early 
 morning period in this case could not be controlled as effectively as in other experi- 
 ments, and therefore the actual values for the period cannot be guaranteed. The 
 general results are correct, however, and indicate that the absence of overtime 
 tends to a more uniform output during the remaining periods of the day. (See 
 Charts Nos. 15, 16.) 
 
 In order that the above conclusions might be further tested, the following experi- 
 ments were arranged : 
 
 A. To determine the effect of an alteration in the length of the working day 
 
 upon output in the case of individual workers. 
 
 B. To determine the effect of an alteration in the length of the working day 
 
 upon rate of working and upon total output in the case of groups of 
 
 workers. 
 
 The hours worked in the Winding Room are as described on page 23, the period 
 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. being regarded as overtime. This overtime was discontinued on 
 February 7th. 
 
37 
 
 All of the workers in the following tests occasionally had the assistance of 
 young girls learning to " wind," called " helpers." Probably No. 14 A had rather 
 more such assistance than the other members of the group. 
 
 The majority of the workers adhered to the ordinary times and worked twelve 
 hours a day. One of them, however, No. 14 A, very frequently did not attend 
 during overtime. She also habitually commenced work at 8.30 a.m. instead of 
 at 6 a.m. Thus, she usually worked only eight hours a day instead of twelve, and 
 when asked the reason, replied that the extra rest enabled her to work so much 
 more quickly during the day that she was able easily to make up for the lost time. 
 
 It should be recollected that " winding " is paid for at piece rates. 
 
 Here was a case where an individual worker had decided for herself that it 
 was more profitable to work a short day than a long one. Not only was overtime 
 cut off, but the early-morning period also. 
 
 In order to ascertain the result of this shortening of the working day, a deter- 
 ini nation was first of all made of the output of this particular winder, and of the 
 output of three first-class workers in the same room who habitually worked for the 
 full twelve-hours day. To make the comparison more strict, the output on those 
 exceptional occasions when No. 14 A worked in the early morning, or during over- 
 time, has been excluded from the tables. Thus the comparison is between a single 
 individual working for eight hours per day and three individuals working twelve 
 hours a day for the first part of the experiment, and ten hours a day for the second 
 part, after overtime had been abolished. 
 
 The observations were carried on for twenty-five working days, and on 
 fifteen days of this period No. 14 A the short-time worker turned out a greater 
 output than any one of the other three workers selected for comparison. On 
 five days she showed a better output than two of the others, on one day a better 
 output than one, and on only three days of the twenty-five was her output lower 
 than any of the others. This result was achieved in spite of the fact that she was 
 absent for the whole of one day and for three four-hour periods in addition, thus 
 making a total absence of two days and a half. On every one of the three days 
 on which she was bottom of the list she was absent for at least a half of her working 
 day, i.e., for four hours. On one of these occasions she was absent the whole day, 
 so that no output was shown. On the other hand, some of the other workers, 
 though, as a rule, exceedingly regular in their attendances, did occasionally absent 
 themselves, almost always during the overtime period. 
 
 Taking the weekly totals, the following results were obtained. In the weeks 
 ending January 29th, February 5th, and February 19th that is. three weeks out 
 of four No. 14 A showed a better output than any of the other workers. In the 
 week ending February 12th she was bottom of the list. She was, however, absent 
 from work for the whole of the Wednesday of this week, as well as for the afternoon 
 periods of Monday and Tuesday. This represents an absence of two whole days 
 during the week, so that the low output is not surprising. 
 
 If the weekly totals of each worker be added together, it will be seen that for 
 the whole period the total of No. 14 A was 52,429. The average of the other three 
 was 48,529. Thus, working for eight hours a day against others working twelve 
 or ten. No. 14 A showed an output for the whole period better than the average of 
 the others by about 7'5 per cent. 
 
 The claim of this worker, that the extra rest obtained by habitually working 
 eight hours a day instead of twelve enabled her to work more quickly and thus to 
 make up the lost time, appears to be justified. 
 
 Further, convincing proof that the abolition of overtime may actually increase 
 output of individual workers is afforded by the same set of figures. These figures 
 (pp. 47, 48, 49) show that the three full-time workers, Nos. 10, 13 and 8, worked 
 twelve hours per day for the first two weeks of the experiment, whilst overtime was in 
 force, and ten hours per day of the second two weeks, after overtime had been 
 abolished. 
 
 The weekly totals of these two periods show that two individuals out of three 
 produced a greater total weekly output in the period after overtime had been 
 abolished than before. The third individual showed a slightly lower output after 
 overtime had been abolished, but she was absent for a total of ten hours in the 
 period. 
 
 If the weekly totals be collected, the grand total for the two weeks when 
 overtime was worked is (when corrected for lost time) 67,743. The grand total 
 for the two weeks after overtime had been abolished (similarly corrected) is 71,182. 
 
38 
 
 The difference is rather more than 5 per cent, in favour of the latter period. 
 Thus, a diminution of 16'6 per cent, in the length of the working day resulted 
 in an absolute increase in the output of over 5 per cent. 
 
 TAHLE SHOWING OUTPUT OF A WORKER ENGAGED DURING EIGHT HOURS PER DAY 
 COMPARED WITH THAT OF THREE SIMILAR WORKERS ENGAGED DURING TWELVE 
 HOURS PER DAY : AND ALSO THE OUTPUT OF WORKERS BEFORE AND AFTER THE 
 ABOLITION OF OVERTIME. 
 
 The values are those of Winder No. 14A working eight hours per day, and 
 Nos. 8, 10, 13, working twelve hours per day. 
 
 Time and Day. 
 
 No. 14A. 
 
 No. 10. 
 
 No. 13. 
 
 No. 8. 
 
 1916. 
 
 
 
 
 
 Tuesday, .January 25th ... 6 8 ... 
 
 
 
 397 
 
 356 
 
 185 
 
 8.30 12.30... 
 
 1,645 
 
 939 
 
 689 
 
 1,078 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,523 866 
 
 765 
 
 820 
 
 68 
 
 416 
 
 328 
 
 264 
 
 Total for day 
 
 3,168 
 
 2,618 
 
 2,138 
 
 2,347 
 
 Wednesday, January 26th 6 8 
 
 
 354 
 
 133 
 
 214 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,219 
 
 1,009 
 
 795 
 
 851 
 
 1.30 . r >. 30 ... 
 
 1,447 
 
 886 
 
 713 
 
 1,127 
 
 6-8 
 
 _ 
 
 288 
 
 338 
 
 117 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,666 
 
 2,537 
 
 1,979 
 
 2,609 
 
 Thursday, January 27th ... 6 8 
 
 
 
 474 
 
 197 
 
 1 98 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,324 
 
 604 
 
 638 
 
 762 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,025 
 
 956 
 
 639 
 
 634 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,349 
 
 2,034 
 
 1,474 
 
 1,594 
 
 Friday, January 28th ... 6 8 ... 
 
 
 
 205 
 
 129 
 
 391 
 
 8.3012.30 ... 
 
 1,567 
 
 982 
 
 944 
 
 770 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,442 
 
 864 
 
 543 
 
 688 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 327 
 
 335 
 
 314 
 
 Total for day 
 
 3,009 
 
 2,378 
 
 2,251 
 
 2,163 
 
 Saturday, January 29th ... 6 8 
 
 
 
 435 
 
 363 
 
 225 
 
 8.30 11.30... 
 
 1,148 
 
 607 
 
 740 
 
 576 
 
 Total for day 
 
 1,148 
 
 1,042 
 
 1,103 
 
 801 
 
 Monday, January 31st ... 6 8 
 
 
 
 212 
 
 288 
 
 187 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,299 
 
 955 
 
 719 
 
 718 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,040 
 
 788 
 
 897 
 
 889 
 
 6-8 
 
 
 
 
 
 298 
 
 332 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,339 
 
 1,955 
 
 2,202 
 
 2,126 
 
 Tuesday, February 1st ... 6 8 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,188 
 
 410 
 
 827 
 
 255 
 875 
 
 373 
 886 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,161 
 
 835 
 
 1,001 
 
 772 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 186 
 
 172 
 
 118 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,349 
 
 2,258 
 
 2,303 
 
 2,149 
 
 Wednesday, February 2nd 6 8 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,300 
 
 432 
 923 
 
 351 
 
 890 
 
 218 
 1,040 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,190 
 
 700 
 
 918 
 
 958 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 
 
 341 
 
 Total for day 2,490 2,055 
 
 2,159 2,557 
 
 Thursday, February 3rd ... 6 8 
 
 447 
 
 311 
 
 251 
 
 8.3012.30... 940 
 
 1,061 
 
 871 
 
 784 
 
 1.305.30 ... 1,213 
 
 889 
 
 828 
 
 1,143 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total for day ... 2,153 
 
 2,397 2.010 
 
 2,178 
 
 Fridav, February 4th ... 6 <S 
 
 ^ 
 
 306 
 
 330 
 
 365 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,467 
 
 1,060 
 
 711 
 
 823 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,398 
 
 891 
 
 740 
 
 594 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 356 
 
 201 
 
 216 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,865 
 
 2,616 
 
 1,982 
 
 1,998 
 
39 
 
 Time and Day. 
 
 No. 14A. 
 
 No. 10. 
 
 No. 13. 
 
 No. 8. 
 
 Saturday, February 5th ... 6 8 
 
 
 449 
 
 369 
 
 218 
 
 8.3011.30... 
 
 931 
 
 676 
 
 494 
 
 457 
 
 Total for day 
 
 931 
 
 1,125 
 
 863 
 
 675 
 
 Monday, February 7th ... C 8 ... 
 
 
 
 391 
 
 10.-) 
 
 
 
 8.3012.3(1... 
 
 1,025 
 
 1,324 
 
 719 
 
 941 
 
 1.300.30 ... 
 
 
 
 82:") 
 
 833 
 
 722 
 
 68 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total for day 
 
 1,025 2,540 
 
 1,957 
 
 1,663 
 
 Tuesday, February 8th ... 68 ... 
 
 
 
 518 
 
 363 
 
 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,260 
 
 1,007 
 
 701 
 
 956 
 
 1.30530 ... 
 
 
 
 834 
 
 850 
 
 943 
 
 G 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total for day 
 
 1,260 
 
 2,359 1,914 
 
 1,899 
 
 Wednesday, February 9th 6 8 
 
 _ 
 
 513 
 
 376 
 
 422 
 
 83012.30... 
 
 
 
 '.157 
 
 761 
 
 970 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 
 
 959 
 
 899 
 
 886 
 
 Total for day 
 
 
 
 2,429 
 
 2,036 
 
 2,278 
 
 Overtime formally suspended from this 
 
 
 
 
 
 date. 
 
 
 
 
 
 Thursday, February 10th 68 
 
 
 
 390 
 
 253 
 
 468 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,451 
 
 904 
 
 938 
 
 803 
 
 1.30530 ... 
 
 1,398 
 
 826 
 
 1,071 
 
 714 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,849 
 
 2,120 
 
 2,262 
 
 1,985 
 
 Friday, February llth ... 68... 
 
 
 
 451 
 
 381 
 
 359 
 
 8.3012.30.. 
 
 1,602 
 
 965 
 
 1,188 
 
 630 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,387 
 
 988 
 
 964 
 
 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,989 
 
 2,404 
 
 2,533 
 
 989 
 
 Saturday, February 12th 6 8 
 
 
 
 531 
 
 445 
 
 322 
 
 8.3011.30 ... 
 
 1,004 
 
 462 
 
 786 
 
 372 
 
 Total for day 
 
 1,004 
 
 993 
 
 1,231 
 
 694 
 
 Monday, February 14th ... 6 8 
 
 _ 
 
 549 
 
 470 
 
 211 
 
 8.30-12.30... 
 
 1,306 
 
 991 
 
 1,085 
 
 518 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 928 
 
 880 
 
 1,125 
 
 549 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,234 
 
 2,420 
 
 2,680 
 
 1,278 
 
 Tuesday, February 15th ... 68 ... 
 
 
 
 457 
 
 511 
 
 443 
 
 8.3012.30 ... 
 
 1,293 
 
 1,072 
 
 800 
 
 944 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,188 
 
 951 
 
 841 
 
 731 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,481 
 
 2,480 
 
 2,152 
 
 2,118 
 
 Wednesday, February 16th 6 8 
 
 _^__ 
 
 483 
 
 623 
 
 260 
 
 8.3012.30 ... 
 
 1,563 
 
 834 
 
 923 
 
 1,101 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,559 
 
 990 
 
 740 
 
 858 
 
 Total for day 
 
 3,122 
 
 2,307 
 
 2,286 
 
 2,219 
 
 Thursday, February 17th 68 
 
 , L 
 
 472 
 
 389 
 
 419 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,668 
 
 1,109 
 
 853 
 
 971 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,360 
 
 918 
 
 586 
 
 717 
 
 Total for day 
 
 3,028 
 
 2,499 
 
 1,828 
 
 2,107 
 
 Friday, February 18th ... 68 ... 
 
 __,_ 
 
 273 
 
 474 
 
 273 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 1,316 
 
 
 
 947 
 
 940 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,034 
 
 632 
 
 853 
 
 1,014 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,350 
 
 905 
 
 2,274 
 
 2,227 
 
 Saturday, February 19th 68 ... 
 
 
 
 509 
 
 455 
 
 347 
 
 8.3011.30... 
 
 1,053 
 
 577 
 
 439 
 
 594 
 
 Total for day 
 
 1,053 
 
 1,086 
 
 894 
 
 941 
 
 Monday, February 21st ... 6 8 
 
 
 
 262 
 
 ^_ 
 
 
 
 8.3012.30... 
 
 813 
 
 863 
 
 864 
 
 729 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 
 
 879 
 
 1,160 
 
 730 
 
 Total for day 
 
 813 
 
 2,004 
 
 2,024 
 
 1,459 
 
 Tuesday, February 22nd... 68 ... 
 
 
 
 366 
 
 373 
 
 323 
 
 8.3012.30 ... 
 
 1,501 
 
 932 
 
 1,163 
 
 792 
 
 1.305.30 ... 
 
 1,253 782 750 
 
 955 
 
 Total for day 
 
 2,754 2,080 2,286 
 
 2,070 
 
10 
 
 TABLE, CONTINUATION OF FOREGOING, SHOWING WEEKLY TOTALS AND GRAND TOTALS OF 
 
 OUTPUT. 
 
 Day. 
 
 No. 14A. 
 
 No. 10. 
 
 No. 13. 
 
 No. 8. 
 
 Tuesday, January 25th 
 
 3,168 
 
 2,018 
 
 2.138 
 
 2,347 
 
 Wednesday, January 20th 
 
 2,666 
 
 2,537 
 
 1,979 
 
 2,00'.i 
 
 Thursday, January 27th ... . . 
 
 2,34'.) 
 
 2,034 
 
 1,474 
 
 1,594 
 
 Friday, January 28th 
 
 3,009 
 
 2,378 
 
 2,251 
 
 2,163 
 
 Saturday, January, 29th ... . . 
 
 1,148 
 
 1,042 
 
 1,103 
 
 SOI 
 
 
 12,340 
 
 10,609 
 
 8,945 
 
 9.514 
 
 Monday, January 31st 
 
 2,339 
 
 1,955 
 
 2,202 
 
 2,120 
 
 Tuesday, February 1st 
 
 2,349 
 
 2.258 
 
 2,303 
 
 2,149 
 
 Wednesday, February 2nd 
 
 2,490 
 
 2,055 
 
 2,159 
 
 2,557 
 
 Thursday, February 3rd 
 
 2,153 
 
 2,397 
 
 2,010 
 
 2,178 
 
 Friday, February 4th ... 
 
 2,865 
 
 2.610 
 
 1,982 
 
 1,598 
 
 Saturday, February 5th 
 
 931 
 
 1,125 
 
 863 
 
 675 
 
 
 13,127 
 
 12,406 
 
 11,519 
 
 11,683 
 
 Monday, February 7th 
 
 1,025 
 
 2,540 
 
 1,957 
 
 1,663 
 
 Tuesday, February 8th 
 
 1,260 
 
 2,351) 
 
 1,914 
 
 1,899 
 
 Wednesday, February 9th 
 
 
 
 2,42'.l 
 
 2,036 
 
 2,278 
 
 Thursday, February 10th 
 
 2,849 
 
 2,120 
 
 2,262 
 
 1,985 
 
 Friday, February llth 
 
 2,989 
 
 2,404 
 
 2,533 
 
 989 
 
 Saturday, February 12th 
 
 1,001 
 
 993 
 
 1,231 
 
 694 
 
 
 9,127 
 
 12,845 
 
 11,933 
 
 9,508 
 
 Monday, February 14th 
 
 2,234 
 
 2,420 
 
 2,680 
 
 1,278 
 
 Tuesday, February 15th 
 
 2,481 
 
 2,480 
 
 2,152 
 
 2,118 
 
 Wednesday, February 16th ... 
 
 3,122 
 
 2,307 
 
 2,286 
 
 2.219 
 
 Thursday, February 17th 
 
 3,028 
 
 2,499 
 
 1,828 
 
 2,107 
 
 Friday, February 18th 
 
 2,350 
 
 905 
 
 2,274 
 
 '2,227 
 
 Saturday, February 19th 
 
 1,053 
 
 1,080 
 
 894 
 
 941 
 
 
 14,268 
 
 11,697 
 
 12,114 
 
 10,890 
 
 Monday, February 21st 
 
 813 
 
 2,004 
 
 2,024 
 
 1,459 
 
 Tuesday, February 22nd 
 
 2,754 
 
 2,080 
 
 2,280 
 
 2,070 
 
 
 3,567 
 
 4,084 
 
 4,310 
 
 3,529 
 
 GRAND TOTALS. 
 
 Week ending January 29th 
 February 5th ... 
 February 12th.,. 
 February 19th 
 February 21st and 22nd 
 
 12,340 
 13,127 
 9.127 
 14,268 
 3,567 
 52,429 
 
 52,429 
 for total of 
 160 hours. 
 
 10,60!) 
 12,400 
 12,845 
 11,697 
 4,084 
 51,641 
 
 8,945 
 
 11,511) 
 11,933 
 12,114 
 4,310 
 48,821 
 
 9,514 
 1 1,683 
 9.508 
 10,890 
 3,529 
 45,124 
 
 AVERAGE. 
 
 48,529 
 for average total of 236 7 hours. 
 
 SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE TABLES. 
 
 The above Tables show the following results : 
 
 1. The output of No. 14A, working eight hours per day, is greater than the 
 
 average total output of Nos. 10, 13 and 8, working twelve hours per 
 day for the first two weeks and ten hours per day for the second two 
 weeks of the experiment, by 
 
 more than 8 per cent. 
 
 2. The total output of Nos. 10, 13 and 8, working ten hours per day, is greater 
 
 than their total output when working twelve hours per day, by 
 more than 5 per cent. 
 
 3. The average rate of working of No. 14A is 3277 bobbins per hour, calcu- 
 
 lated on ''works time," against the average rate of 20f>'0 bobbins per 
 hour of the remaining three. If the number of hours actually worked 
 be taken, instead of "'works times." the figures are 143'3 hours for 
 
II 
 
 No. 14A, and 206'3 hours (average) for the other three. The rates 
 calculated from these latter figures are 365'9 bobbins per hour for 
 No. 14A, and 235'2 bobbins per hour for the remainder.* 
 
 Further results of a similar character are shown in the Tables on page 51. 
 
 The average rate of working has been determined for the different periods of 
 the day in a group of eight Winders. The experiment lasted six weeks. For the 
 first two weeks the working day consisted of twelve hours, divided into four periods, 
 the early morning and overtime periods of two hours each, and the two middle day 
 periods of four hours each. 
 
 For the second two weeks the first three periods of the day were worked as 
 before, but the overtime period was cancelled. 
 
 For the third two weeks both overtime and early morning periods were cancelled 
 and the working day came to consist of eight hours only, worked in the two middle 
 periods of four hours each. 
 
 Taking the first period which was worked throughout the whole of the experi- 
 ment, 8.30 a.m. -12.30 p.m., the average rate of working in spindles per hour for the 
 first week was 262, for the second week 263. During the third week, when no over- 
 time was worked, the figure was 277, and during the fourth week 275, both numbers 
 considerably higher than those of the previous weeks. 
 
 On Wednesday, 23rd February, the early morning period was discontinued, 
 but owing to the requirements of the mill it was impossible to carry this arrange- 
 ment beyond Wednesday, 1st March. The output for the morning period of this 
 week was 316 spindles por hour, a figure higher by 39 than the highest previously 
 recorded. 
 
 The average in the following week, when early morning period was resumed, 
 was 257. 
 
 Turning to the second period, 1.30 p.m. -5.30 p.m., which was worked through- 
 out the whole of the experiment, the average for the first two weeks, when 
 overtime and early morning periods were worked, was 266. For the second two 
 weeks, when no overtime was worked, 257 and 266, and for the period during which 
 no early morning period was worked 279. 
 
 In the week when early morning period was resumed it fell to 245. 
 
 Thus, the cessation of overtime was followed by an improvement in the morning 
 output of 14 spindles per hour for the first week and 12 spindles. per hour for the 
 second week. In the afternoon period, the first week showed a drop of 9 spindles 
 per hour, and the second week a rise to a value similar to that which existed at 
 the beginning of the experiment. The cessation of the early morning work was 
 followed by an improvement in the morning period of 41 spindles per hour, in the 
 afternoon by an improvement of 13 spindles 'per hour. The shortened day affected 
 the morning output to a greater extent than that of the afternoon, and the abolition 
 of the early morning period was more effective than the abolition of overtime in 
 increasing output during the remainder of the day. 
 
 Since a diminution of the length of the working day resulted in an increase in 
 the rate of working, it appears that the rate existing under the conditions of a 
 twelve hours' day is by no means the greatest of which the worker is capable. In 
 this particular occupation the actual rate is limiteH by the fatigue of the worker, 
 rather than by other conditions. 
 
 * Incidentally it is interesting to note tbat 
 
 (a) The " works time " for No. 14A was 160 hours. 
 
 The time actually worked was ... ... ... ... ... ... 143'.'5 
 
 (b) The " works time " for the remaining three (average) was 236'7 
 
 The time actually worked was ... ... ... ... ... ... 206 '3 
 
 showing a loss of 16'7 hours by No. 14A, and an average loss of BO'-i hours by the remainder in a 
 total of 25 working days. 
 
 The total loss of time by the four workers in the same period amounted to 107'7 houra. 
 
 7312 F 
 
TABLE SHOWING THE EFFECT OF THE ABOLITION OF OVERTIME AND OF THE EARLY 
 MORNING PERIOD UPON THE RATE OF WORKING OF A GROUP OF EIGHT WINDERS. 
 
 General Averages in Bobbins per hour. 
 
 Day. 
 
 6-<S <t. in. 
 
 8.30-12 30. 
 
 1.30-5.30. 
 
 6-8 p.m. 
 
 Tuesday, January 25th, 1916... 
 
 205 
 
 270 
 
 264 
 
 241 
 
 Wednesday 26th 
 
 217 
 
 255 
 
 271 
 
 214 
 
 Thursday 27th 
 
 247 
 
 247 
 
 253 
 
 
 
 Friday ' 28th 
 
 206 
 
 284 
 
 247 
 
 253 
 
 Saturday 29th 
 
 251 
 
 261 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 31st 
 
 171 
 
 259 
 
 294 
 
 274 
 
 Average for week 
 
 216 
 
 262 
 
 266 
 
 245 
 
 Tuesday, February 1st 
 
 258 
 
 270 
 
 260 
 
 238 
 
 Wednesday 2nd 
 
 234 
 
 280 
 
 274 
 
 274 
 
 Thursday 3rd 
 
 286 
 
 251 
 
 292 
 
 
 
 Friday 4th 
 
 226 
 
 262 
 
 275 
 
 248 
 
 Saturday 5th 
 
 271 
 
 268 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 7th 
 
 242 
 
 248 
 
 231 
 
 
 
 Average for week 
 
 253 
 
 263 
 
 266 
 
 253 
 
 Tuesday, February 8th 
 
 275 
 
 379 
 
 227 
 
 
 
 Wednesday ,, 9th 
 
 288 
 
 259 
 
 260 
 
 
 
 Thursday 10th 
 
 234 
 
 258 
 
 256 
 
 
 
 Friday ., . llth 
 
 278 
 
 284 
 
 281 
 
 
 
 Saturday 12th 
 
 237 
 
 244 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 14th 
 
 239 
 
 240 
 
 261 
 
 
 
 Average for week 
 
 258 
 
 277 
 
 257 
 
 
 
 Tuesday, February loth 
 
 278 
 
 274 
 
 269 
 
 
 
 Wednesday ,, J6th 
 
 281 
 
 284 
 
 272 
 
 
 
 Thursday 17th 
 
 248 
 
 281 
 
 256 
 
 
 
 Friday ' 18th 
 
 273 
 
 280 
 
 285 
 
 
 
 Saturday ,, 19th 
 
 245 
 
 285 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 21st 
 
 239 
 
 245 
 
 249 
 
 
 
 Average for week 
 
 261 
 
 275 
 
 266 
 
 
 
 Wedn> sday, February 23rd ... 
 
 
 
 314 
 
 308 
 
 
 
 Thursday 24th 
 
 
 
 346 
 
 284 
 
 
 
 Friday 25th 
 
 
 
 307 
 
 283 
 
 
 
 Saturday 26th 
 
 
 
 295 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 28th 
 
 
 
 333 
 
 270 
 
 
 
 Tuesday 29th ... 
 
 
 
 300 
 
 251 
 
 
 
 Average for week 
 
 
 
 316 
 
 279 
 
 
 
 Wednesday, March 1st 
 
 
 
 305 
 
 247 
 
 
 
 Thursday '2nd 
 
 192 
 
 269 
 
 269 
 
 
 
 Friday .'Vd 
 
 278 
 
 265 
 
 247 
 
 
 
 Saturday 4th 
 
 '234 
 
 226 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday 6th 
 
 176 
 
 229 
 
 237 
 
 
 
 Tuesday 7th 
 
 233 
 
 249 
 
 227 
 
 
 
 Average for week 
 
 223 
 
 257 
 
 245 
 
 ~ 
 
 SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE TABLE. 
 
 Bobbins per Hour. 
 
 Average Rate of Working for the Morning Period, 
 8.30-12.30, during two weeks when Early Morn- 
 ing Perjod and Overtime were worked ... ... 262'5 
 
 Average Rate for two weeks when Overtime was 
 
 abolished 2760 
 
 Average Rate for week when Early Morning Period 
 
 was abolished 3160 
 
 Average Rate for week when Early Morning Period 
 
 was re-introduced 257'0 
 
 Average Rate for the Afternoon Period, 1.30-5.30, 
 during two weeks when Early Morning Period 
 and Overtime were worked 266 
 
43 
 
 Bobbins per Hour. 
 Average Rate for two weeks when Overtime was 
 
 abolished ... 261 5 
 
 Average Rate for week when Early Morning Period 
 
 was abolished ... ... ... ... ... 279'0 
 
 Average Rate for week when Early Morning Period 
 
 was re-introduced ... ... ... ... ... 245'0 
 
 Average Rate for Two Middle-day Periods, 8.30-12.30 
 
 and 1.30-5.30, during two weeks when Early 
 
 Morning Period and Overtime were worked 264'0 
 
 Average Rate for two weeks when Overtime was 
 
 abolished 269'0 
 
 Average Rate for week when Early Morning Period 
 
 was abolished ... ... ... ... ... 297'5 
 
 Average Rate for week when Early Morning Period 
 
 was re-introduced 251 
 
 Sum inn HI of Section II. 
 
 The Influence of Fatigue and of Overtime upon Output. 
 
 Output varies according to (1) the condition of the worker with regard to skill, 
 health, freedom from fatigue, proper food, and fitness, and (2) the circumstances of 
 the worker with regard to machinery, material, associated workers, weather, &c. 
 
 Where the factory day consists of four working periods, output is low during 
 two of these, viz., the early morning period, and overtime. 
 
 During the middle periods of the day output is normally high, but is lowered 
 by the working of overtime. This diminution is often so great that the total daily 
 output is less when overtime is worked than when it is suspended. Thus overtime 
 defeats its own object. 
 
 The lowest output of the day is often found in the early morning period at the 
 beginning of the week, and in the period of overtime at the week's end. The change 
 appears to be due to the accumulation of fatigue, and to the wearing off of the 
 Monday effect. 
 
 The Monday effect described on p. 18 is not without a definite influence on output. 
 It should be recognised and controlled where maximum output is desired. 
 
 In cases where the early morning hours are not worked, the unsatisfactory 
 output commonly found in this period appears to be transferred, or not to be trans- 
 ferred, to the succeeding period, according to the particular day of the week 
 concerned. On Monday the suspension of the early morning hours will as a rule 
 lower output in the succeeding period. On Tuesday also a lowering will be noticed. 
 On the remaining days of the week the suspension of work during the early morning 
 hours is followed by an improvement in the output of the morning period. The 
 change is due to the greater influence of practice (through restored co-ordination) 
 early in the week, and of rest (through lessened fatigue) later on. 
 
 A worker may occasionally show a very high output in the early morning period. 
 
 Psychical influences affect output. The output on Saturday, in spite of great 
 fatigue, is often high, owing to anticipation of the week-end rest. 
 
 Workers may be so greatly fatigued at the end of the week that an extra period 
 of overtime is beyond their powers, and should this be insisted upon, an unsatis- 
 factory output may be expected. A similar condition may exist on Friday. 
 
 Great variations may occur in the output of individual workers at different 
 times. The causes of such variations may be purely personal and temporary, or they 
 may be general, and affect groups of workers. 
 
 The unsatisfactory output of the early morning period is due partly to loss of 
 co-ordination. ^ It appears to depend also upon lack of rest, lack of food, and general 
 discomfort. These things arise indirectly from excessive hours of labour. 
 
 The unsatisfactory output of the overtime period is due to fatigue. 
 "3ig F 2 
 
14 
 
 The early morning period may be regarded as bearing a similar relation to the 
 day as Monday bears to the week. In both cases abstinence from work has produced 
 a disinclination for labour, and an inability to carry it out effectively. This is due 
 rather to loss of co-ordination than to fatigue. Examples of similar loss of co-ordi- 
 nation may be found in knitting, in typewriting, and in similar processes. 
 
 Where no overtime is worked, output during the different periods of the day is 
 more equal. 
 
 A worker employed for ten hours per day may produce a greater output than 
 when employed for twelve hours, the extra rest being more than sufficient to com- 
 pensate for the loss of time. 
 
 A worker employed for eight hours per day may produce a greater output than 
 another of equal capacity working twelve hours per day. 
 
 A group of workers showed an absolute increase of over five per cent, of output 
 as a result of a diminution of sixteen and a half per cent, in the length of the working 
 day. 
 
 Another group increased their average rate of output from 262 to 276 as a result 
 of shortening the day from twelve hours to ten, and to 316 on a further shortening 
 of two hours. 
 
 A group of piece workers increased their earnings considerably as a result of 
 a diminution in the length of the working day. 
 
 The suspension of overtime affects especially the output of the morning period. 
 
 The suspension of the early morning period increases the rate of output, even 
 after overtime has been suspended. 
 
 The time " lost " by factory workers may approach an average of ten per cent, 
 of the working day. The amount lost varies with the length of the working day, 
 and appears to depend upon fatigue. 
 
 Under the conditions studied, neither rate of working nor total output attains 
 a maximum when a twelve-hour day is adopted. 
 
 Rate of working and total output are limited by fatigue rather than by other 
 conditions. 
 
 Total daily output may be diminished by the introduction of overtime. 
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 (i.) POOD AND FEEDING. 
 
 The efficiency of the worker depends upon the suitability of his food. 
 
 Evident as this must be, it is yet a fact that many operatives are badly and 
 unsuitably fed, whilst in spite of its national importance, there does not appear 
 to^exist any adequate machinery for the dissemination of sound ideas with regard 
 to diet amongst the working class population.* Some individuals earn scanty 
 wages in the early stages of their employment and are unable to feed themselves 
 properly. Later, when higher wages are available, and the provision of better food 
 is possible, the tendency towards a vicious habit remains and is difficult to break 
 a. way from. Amongst women the foundations of dyspepsia'have often been laid.t 
 
 * For many years the present writer has endeavoured to spread knowledge on this subject 
 amongst students of Day Training Colleges by means of lectures and practical classes, in the hope 
 that information thus acquired might be transmitted to elementary school children and ultimately 
 reach the workers. 
 
 t An inquiry with regard to dyspepsia was put to nineteen workers. The following replies 
 were received : 
 
 One suffered very badly. 
 Two suffered badly. 
 Two suffered slightly. 
 Two suffered (without note of severity). 
 
 This is equal to a percentage of 36'8 of the workers questioned, who were selected quite 
 promiscuously. 
 
45 
 
 The direct result of unsatisfactory feeding is equally striking, as the following 
 example shows. 
 
 Amongst the Winders there is a considerable variation in individual output 
 for the early morning period (6 a.m. -8 a.m.). (See Tables on pp. 24-26 and Curves 
 9 and 10.) 
 
 In the week ending 27th November, 1915, the best result on Monday was given 
 by No. 12, who was working at the rate of 293 bobbins per hour. No. 10 shows a 
 rate of 166, No. 8, 121, and No. 9 only 85. On Tuesday the numbers were : No. 12, 
 236, No. 10, 140, No. 8, 188, and No. 9, 127. On Thursday, No. 12 gave 221, No. 10, 
 204, No. 8, 152, and No. 9, 97. 
 
 On all of these days one individual No. 9 was working at a rate conspicuously 
 lower than the other members of the group in the early morning period, although 
 her output was above the average in some of the other periods of the day. 
 
 In the following week (p. 25 and Curve 10) the results are very similar. On 
 Monday the average output for all the workers was 186, the output for No. 9 was 67. 
 On Tuesday the average was 187, No. 9 gave 164. On Wednesday the average was 
 229, No. 9 gave 224. On Thursday the average was 244, No. 9 gave 234. On Friday 
 the average was 263, No. 9 gave 176. On Saturday the average was 219, No. 9 gave 
 129. 
 
 During this week the output of No. 9 was invariably below the average of the 
 other workers, and on three occasions it was conspicuously worse than the individual 
 output of any other member of the group. 
 
 On referring to details of the individual workers it was found that No. 9 alone 
 of this group was in the habit of coming to the mill in the morning without having 
 taken food. Her ordinary dietary also was inadequate. (See p. 67.) 
 
 Amongst the Boracic Lint Packers there are four who take food before coming 
 to the mill in the morning, and one who stated that she " sometimes " took tea, 
 bread and butter, but otherwise, nothing. It is this single worker, No. 36, who 
 " sometimes " took food before work who shows an output during the early morning 
 period of December 9th, 10th, llth, 15th, 16th and 18th, lower than that of the 
 other members of the group. (See p. 36.) There is no certainty as to which 
 represent "unfed " days in the case of No. 36 in these curves, so that proof is not 
 very convincing, but the figures are of interest in view of the fact that this worker 
 was only " sometimes- fed," whilst the other members of the group were "always- fed." 
 
 On another occasion the output of three Winders was tested over some weeks. 
 During the first portion of the test the hours were 6 a.m. -8 a.m., 8.30 a.m. -12.30 p.m., 
 and 1.30 p.m. -5. 30 p.m. During the second portion the hours were similar, except 
 that the early morning period, 6 a.m. -8 a.m., was suspended. 
 
 OUTPUT OF Two MIDDLE-DAY PERIODS. 
 First Experimental Period (February 9th to February loth, 1916). 
 
 Date. 
 
 No. 10. 
 
 No. 13. 
 
 No. 8. 
 
 Wednesday, February 9th 
 Thursday, February 10th 
 Friday, February lltb ... 
 
 957 
 959 
 
 904 
 826 
 965 
 
 761 
 
 899 
 938 
 1,071 
 1,188 
 
 970 
 886 
 803 
 714 
 630 
 
 Saturday, February 12th 
 Monday, February 14th ... 
 
 988 
 
 462 
 1)91 
 
 964 
 786 
 1,085 
 
 372 
 518 
 
 Tuesday, February 15th... 
 
 880 
 1,072 
 
 1,125 
 
 800 
 
 549 
 944 
 
 
 951 
 
 841 
 
 731 
 
 Totals 
 
 9,955 
 
 10,458 
 
 7 117 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 27,530 
 
 
 27 
 
 The average daily output for the three workers in the middle-day periods is 
 - 
 
 - 
 f~ x 2 = 5,006 bobbins. 
 
46 
 
 OUTPUT OF Two MIDDLE-DAY PERIODS. 
 
 Second Experimental Period (February 23rd to February 29th, 1916). 
 Early morning period suspended. 
 
 Date. 
 
 No. 10. 
 
 No. 13. 
 
 No. 8. 
 
 Wednesday, February 23rd 
 Thursday, February 24th 
 Friday, February 25th . . 
 
 1,138 
 980 
 
 848 
 867 
 996 
 
 1,066 
 960 
 1,246 
 1,009 
 1,282 
 
 1,025 
 770 
 1,126 
 1,167 
 1,174 
 
 Saturday, February 26th 
 Monday, February 28th .. 
 
 870 
 477 
 594 
 
 1,200 
 807 
 932 
 
 1,016 
 687 
 607 
 
 Tuesday, February 29th... 
 
 706 
 648 
 
 1,140 
 1,209 
 
 662 
 841 
 
 
 982 
 
 1,007 
 
 933 
 
 Totals 
 
 9,106 
 
 11,858 
 
 10,008 
 
 
 
 
 
 30,972 
 
 SfA 
 
 The average daily output for the three workers in the middle-day periods is 
 
 -- x 2 = 5630 bobbins. 
 
 The average daily output of three workers for the two middle day shifts in 
 the first period was 5,006. In the second period, with no early morning work, it was 
 5,630. 
 
 Thus a diminution of 20 per cent, in the length of a day of ten hours increased 
 output in the remaining hours by 12 4 per cent. 
 
 It is probable that some of the improvement in the above experiment was due 
 to the fact that the workers were able to take a properly-cooked breakfast before 
 leaving home in the morning a privilege they appreciated thoroughly, and referred 
 to repeatedly. 
 
 Other experiments gave similar results, and there is a good deal of evidence to 
 show that increased resistance to fatigue follows improved feeding. 
 
 The present feeding arrangements of the worker leave much to be desired. 
 Men as a rule are better provided for than women, both as regards the material and 
 the method of feeding. The latter are apt to allow bread, butter, and tea a 
 too prominent place in their dietary, and are careless of the conditions under which 
 their food is taken. Moreover, those who are far from home habitually rely upon 
 small shops or the fish bar near the works for their mid -day meal. The shops offer 
 sweets and pastry rather than wholesome, sustaining food, the fish bars offer " fish 
 and chips." The quantity of the more expensive fish is small, the deficiency being 
 masked by the less expensive batter surrounding it. The batter swells up under 
 the action of heat and gives an appearance of bulkiness to the whole. The result 
 is that the meal consists of batter (principally carbohydrate) and potatoes (princi- 
 pally carbohydrate), with fat and little protein. 
 
 In order to gain first hand knowledge of the composition of this material, a 
 supply was obtained from a shop patronised by mill employees, and analysed. The 
 results are given below. The actual cost of the proximate principles has been added, 
 so that the price paid per pound for protein, carbohydrate and fat when purchased 
 in this way may be appreciated. For purposes of comparison the price of these 
 materials in other forms is added.* 
 
 * The material consists of fish of various kinds, surrounded with batter and fried in fat. The 
 potatoes are cut up into "chips" and fried in fat also. The particular kind of fat used seems to vary. 
 Sometimes it is mixed fat collected from the houses. More usually it is cotton-seed oil purchased in 
 kegs. The usual meal consists of : 
 
 One penny-worth of " chips " weighing about 6 ounces. 
 
 One and a half penny-worth of fish (and batter) weighing about 2| ounces. 
 
Besides the extravagant price paid for food thus purchased there are other 
 disadvantages. The food is not really palatable. It may be attractive at first, but 
 soon cloys, and the batter soon satisfies. It is not a material of which a proper 
 quantity can be taken, and the result is a meal unsatisfactory both in quantity and 
 quality. Indulged 'in for a long time and given a chief place in the dietary, it 
 will lead to defective nourishment and lessened energy, whilst the fact that where 
 it is taken fresh vegetables are often absent from the diet tells greatly against it. 
 It appears to be a growing habit with certain classes to feed their children as 
 well as themselves on this material. It is less trouble to send a child to the fish 
 bar with a few pence to get a meal than to prepare it at home, and the unsatis- 
 factory nature of the food has probably never been appreciated. The practice 
 should be discouraged. 
 
 Given suitable food, the conditions under which it is taken have next to be 
 considered. A hurried, uncomfortable meal loses much of its value. Food brought 
 from home and consumed in workrooms only just vacated, without proper table or 
 seating accommodation and in vitiated air, is likely to lead to digestive troubles. 
 Posture, atmosphere, temperature, and surroundings are all against a proper 
 enjoyment and utilization of the meal. 
 
 Some workers, living at a distance from the mill, take the principal meal of 
 the day in the evening. The meal is described as consisting of meat and vegetables. 
 In such a case the lunch is of less consequence. But others take for supper, as 
 for lunch, the convenient fish and chips, and even on Sundays a hot dinner of meat 
 and vegetables is only taken " occasionally." 
 
 Where home conditions are satisfactory, and distance allows, it is wise for 
 workers to go home to all meals. Served comfortably at home, food is taken under 
 the best possible conditions.! 
 
 In the interests of many, therefore, it is desirable that some sort of mess room 
 should be provided at the mill, but where this has been done, improvement has not 
 always followed. The reason appears to be that the requirements of the workers have 
 been misunderstood". They need more than some arrangement for warming food, 
 
 The analysis of such a meal, obtained by one of the workers, gave the following results : 
 
 
 
 Water. 
 
 Protein. 
 
 Fat. 
 
 Carbo-Hydrate 
 as Starch. 
 
 
 
 Chip potatoes 
 Fried fish and batter... 
 
 66-52% 
 61-39 % 
 
 3-20% 
 16-60 % 
 
 5-05% 
 9-32% 
 
 22-50% 
 9-40% 
 
 
 That is to say, the meal contains the following quantities of the essential proximate principles : 
 
 
 Protein. 
 
 Carbo-Hydrate. 
 
 Fat. 
 
 
 17-11 grms. 
 
 14-83 grms. 
 
 15-17 grme. 
 
 Not less than six such meals a day would be necessary to provide an adequate diet, consisting of 
 Protein, 102 grammes, Carbo-hydrate, 269 grammes, and Fat, 90 grammes. 
 
 xThe cost of the constituents bought as " fish and chips," compared with their cost in other 
 forms, is given below. 
 
 ~- f- 
 
 Fried 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Fish 
 and 
 
 Chip 
 Potatoes. 
 
 Bread. 
 
 Cheese. 
 
 Beef. 
 
 Peas 
 (Dried). 
 
 Oatmeal. 
 
 Butter. 
 
 Margarine. 
 
 
 Batter. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 *. d. 
 
 i. d. 
 
 t. d. 
 
 i. d. 
 
 i. d. t. d. 
 
 *. d. 
 
 t. d. t. d. 
 
 Cost of Protein per Ib 
 
 4 10 
 
 6 11 
 
 29 34 
 
 5 10 
 
 1 10 
 
 2 2 
 
 
 Cost of Carbo-Hydrate per Ib. ... 
 
 8 6 
 
 1 
 
 4i ! - 
 
 
 84 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cost of Fat per Ib 
 
 8 7 
 
 4 4i 
 
 ; 4 2 
 
 
 
 
 2 
 
 1 2i 
 
 Current prices 
 
 IK for 
 
 U. for 
 
 9d. for 
 
 1*. per 
 
 1*. 2d. 
 
 5d. per fijrf. for 2 
 
 It. Sd. li. per Ib, 
 
 
 2i oz. 
 
 6 oz. 
 
 4 IDS. 
 
 Ib. 
 
 perlb. 
 
 Ib. Ibs. 
 
 per Ib. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 t A winder, living at a distance from her work, and obliged to take her meals at the mill, 
 changed her residence. As a result she was able to take all meals at home, hot, and comfortably 
 served. Her own statement is that her health has improved, and that she works better and is able 
 to earn more money. The foreman of the room now regards her as one of the most efficient 
 winders under him. 
 
48 
 
 and a table to sit at. To be popular, a mess-room must be large, airy, well-lighted, 
 and warmed. It should be comfortably furnished, and, if possible, should have a 
 cheerful view from the windows. Even this is not all. The workers have their 
 own cliques and coteries, and will not use arrangements which compel them to sit 
 at long tables like school children, or pack them together so. that private conversation 
 is impossible. 
 
 The best possible arrangement for those who cannot go home to meals is the 
 provision of a well-organised and well-managed canteen.* 
 
 (ii.) EQUILIBRIUM AND BALANCING. 
 
 Every individual commences labour with a definite store of energy. When 
 work is performed, energy is dissipated. When rest is taken, energy is renewed. 
 But recovery takes place and fresh energy is made available, even whilst work is 
 in progress. As a rule, energy expenditure preponderates during work, energy 
 renewal, or recovery, preponderates during rest. Thus the condition of the indi- 
 vidual at the end of a period of labour will depend upon : 
 
 1. The original store of energy. 
 
 2. The rate at which energy has been dissipated. 
 
 3. The rate at which energy has been regenerated. 
 
 4. The length of the period of labour. 
 
 1. .The original store of energy possessed by the worker will depend upon : 
 
 A. His physical development, health, and fitness. 
 
 B. The character and duration of the previous labour. 
 
 C. The length of the previous rest. 
 
 D. The manner in which that rest has been employed. 
 
 2. The rate at which energy has been dissipated will depend upon : 
 
 A. His physical development, health and fitness. 
 
 B. The conditions under which labour has been performed. 
 
 C. The efficiency of the worker. 
 
 D. The constancy with which the worker has applied himself to his task. 
 
 Of these, A and B are practically constant over short periods of time, C varies 
 from time to time with health and fitness, which again depend upon feeding, sleep, 
 and relaxation, as well as upon many slight causes liable to be overlooked. The 
 variations are slow, an attack of indisposition lasting for a day or two, a slight 
 illness over a longer period. The one factor which can vary quickly and often is D, 
 the application of the worker to his task. 
 
 3. The rate at which energy has been regenerated will depend upon : 
 
 A. The physique and fitness of the worker. 
 
 B. The supply of food and the manner in which it has been utilized. 
 
 C. The number, length and character of the rest intervals. 
 
 D. The constancy with which the worker has applied himself to his task. 
 There are great differences in the rapidity with which different individuals can 
 
 recuperate during and after labour. 
 
 4. The length of the period of labour. The number of hours worked per diem 
 is as a rule constant under ordinary conditions, but in times of stress is lengthened, 
 the extra period being known as overtime. 
 
 * To be successful, canteens must work smoothly, and that this may be ensured, business-like 
 organisation is essential. Operatives who use them are, as a class, apt to find fault with arrange- 
 ments made for them by others, more especially where those others happen to be their employers. 
 Canteens, therefore, when established, may give rise to discussion, criticism, and complaint. The 
 most vexed question is that of food. In a large gathering of people many different tastes will be 
 found. Hardly any meal that could be provided would meet with universal approval. The 
 difficulties are minimised where each individual is able to select the dish which suits him best, but 
 such selection is impossible so long as the food is provided by the management. It should therefore 
 be provided by the workers. The arrangement may be the following. Tin dishes are provided at 
 the works, each with a numbered label. Food brought in the morning by the workers is placed in 
 these dishes. Gas cookers provide a meins of cooking the food. At dinner time each dish is ready 
 for its owner, and is found covered with a closely fitting lid, which keeps the contents hot. 
 
 The workers arrive at the canteen, secure in the knowledge that their food is to their liking as to 
 quality, sufficient in quantity, properly cooked, and thoroughly hot. There is no hurry and no rush ; 
 each man as he arrives calls for the dish marked with his number, takes it to one of the tables and 
 enjoys it in comfort. 
 
 The management of the canteen should be in the hands of a committee of the workers, each 
 shop sending its own representative. 
 
 The writer has seen the above arrangement in force ; it was found to work admirably. 
 
I!) 
 
 The available energy is used in the performance of labour at a definite 
 rate for a definite period. Under peace conditions, or where slackness 
 prevails, there may be a considerable balance of energy unexpended at the end of 
 the day. but where the hands are working up to their full strength, most of their 
 energy has been expended by evening. Next morning a new balance is available 
 and carries the worker on for another day, but, since recovery in the course of the 
 night is seldom perfect, an increasing debit balance is carried forward from day 
 to day, to be liquidated at the week-end, provided the week-end rest be taken. 
 
 Thus, the worker will not be markedly less efficient at the end of any particular 
 month than at its beginning; the factors concerned will be in equilibrium. 
 
 When the resources of the mill are strained to meet an unusual demand, one 
 of the first steps to be taken is a lengthening of the hours of labour in other words, 
 the introduction of overtime. Where the rule has been a ten-hours day, an extra 
 two hours' shift may be introduced in the evening. 
 
 Such an alteration in a system already in equilibrium must produce a serious 
 and far-reaching disturbance. The mode of living of the operatives must be altered 
 to conform to the new conditions. Time of meals, time of retiring to rest, and mode 
 op spending the evening will be changed, whilst the two hours' extra work will 
 upset the balance between income and expenditure of energy. 
 
 Moreover, since the additional labour must be performed at the end of an 
 ordinary day by an individual who is already tired, the resulting fatigue will be 
 disproportionately great. And since a worker is less able to recuperate after 
 overtime than after a spell of ordinary labour,* the effect of the extra work 
 will extend beyond the added period, and will make recovery less perfect. (See 
 Section I. Summary, p. 22.) 
 
 Evidently, if the worker were already doing his utmost before the introduction 
 of overtime, he cannot supply extra energy for the extra labour and still continue 
 to work at his old rate in the other periods of the day. Some re-adjustment must 
 be made. 
 
 It has been shown that the only factor concerned in the maintenance of 
 equilibrium which can be varied quickly and often is the degree of application of 
 the worker to his task. This means of adjustment will be adopted, consciously or 
 unconsciously, and the men will work twelve hours a day instead of ten, but the 
 closeness of their application will be less throughout the whole period. 
 
 Some idea of how greatly application may vary, and how much time may be 
 lost when it is imperfect may be gained by keeping the worker under constant 
 observation throughout the day. Two workers, tested in this manner, lost an average 
 of 26'5 per cent., 14"5 per cent, and 18'5 per cent, of the total time in the early 
 morning, morning, and afternoon respectively. The greatest loss occurred in the 
 early morning, when conditions were unfavourable to close application, and when 
 output was low. Indeed, where other things are equal, output may be taken as an 
 indication of application. (See Appendix B, p. 72.) 
 
 A similar adaptation occurs whenever heavy manual labour is performed. 
 Such labour is ever deliberate, or interspersed with periods of rest, without which 
 energy would quickly be exhausted. 
 
 Thus, in the adjustment of the application of the worker to his task there 
 exists an arrangement which limits accumulation of fatigue. 
 
 If the hands are already working as assiduously as possible when overtime is 
 introduced, the change will involve extra strain. Reaction will take place, applica 
 tion will be relaxed-, and the fatigue produced per hour will be lessened in conse- 
 quence. Thus the balance will be restored, but at some sacrifice of efficiency. 
 Fatigue will develop at a slower rate for a greater number of hours per day, and 
 recovery will be less perfect. The general efficiency of the worker will be lessened. 
 
 * Indications that application varies with the condition of the worker are found in Charts 13 
 and 14 and Tables on pp. 41, 42 (Lint Packers). A considerable difference exists between the output 
 of the early morning and overtime periods on the one hand, and the middle periods of the day on the 
 other. (Early morning 7IK5 Ibs. per hour, morning HI5-5 Ibs. per hour, afternoon 79'7 Ibs. per hour, 
 and overtime 62 Ibs. per hour.) Of the two periods of low output one conies at the beginning of the 
 day, the other at the end. So far then as output can be taken as a guide, application is poor in the 
 early morning and during overtime. In the early morning, as pointed out elsewhere, the worker is 
 often uncomfortable and hurried, perhaps cold, it may be with wet feet and damp clothes, and 
 sometimes unfed conditions very unfavourable to close application. In the evening period there is 
 a good deal of fatigue. In the two middle periods of the day conditions are better. Breakfast has 
 had a good effect. Clothes and feet have dried. The workrooms are warmer, and the awkwardness 
 due to a night's rest has disappeared. Application is close, and output high. 
 
 7312 G 
 

 50 
 
 The result as regards output will depend upon the character of the work. 
 Where output is controlled mainly by machinery the loss may be small. Where it 
 depends more especially upon the worker, it will be great. Purely mechanical 
 work can sometimes be performed sufficiently well by a tired man. Skilled work 
 calling for judgment and discretion demands freshness and vigour. 
 
 By " balancing " is meant the adjustment of application to the length of the 
 working day, and the maintenance of equilibrium between the development and the 
 expenditure of energy. 
 
 (iii.) THE ATTAINMENT OF MAXIMUM OUTPUT. 
 
 The output of the mill is made up of the output of individual workers. 
 
 The output of individual workers is determined by the conditions of labour, and 
 depends upon time worked and rate of working. 
 
 The time worked varies, both with respect to different workers, and, in the case 
 of the same individual, with the conditions. 
 
 The rate of working also varies, both with respect to different individuals, and, 
 in the case of the same individual, with the conditions. One important condition is 
 the length of the time worked. 
 
 Thus, the time worked and the rate of working are intimately related, and vary 
 in sympathy, and the total output depends upon a proper adjustment of these two 
 factors.* 
 
 The time during which work is actually performed by individual employees may 
 fall considerably short of the official hours during which the departments of the mill 
 are open. For purposes of description the following terms have been adopted. 
 
 Works time ... ... The time included in periods of labour arranged by 
 
 the authorities of the mill. 
 
 Nominal time ... The time during which the worker is registered as 
 
 being present at the mill. This excludes periods 
 of absence owing to illness, and periods " lost " 
 through late arrival, early departure, &c. 
 
 Actual time ... ... The time actually worked. This excludes all periods 
 
 excluded from Nominal time, and, in addition, 
 time lost through late commencement and early 
 cessation when not registered, waiting for work 
 when dependent on others for supplies, and the 
 numerous short periods during which labour is 
 interrupted during the day (talking, &c.). 
 
 The Rate of Working may be calculated as the rate of output per hour of Works 
 Time, Nominal Time, or Actual Time, and corresponding terms are used, viz., Works 
 Rate, Nominal Rate, and Actual Rate. For the sake of simplicity, the Nominal Rale 
 has been little used, the Works Rate and Actual Rate being employed almost exclu- 
 sively in dealing with output. 
 
 Output is evidently obtained by multiplying Works Rate by Works Time, or 
 Actual Rate by Actual Time.t 
 
 The results of a series of tests which illustrate these points have been set 
 out in the Tables. The figures have been obtained from a group of eight piece 
 workers, the average capacity of the whole group being as nearly as possible normal. 
 The examination extended over 'a period of six weeks, during which time the condi- 
 tions of labour underwent considerable modifications. The working day consisted 
 at one time of eight hours, at another ten, and at yet another time of twelve hours. 
 Thus, not only the initial differences between Works Time and Actual Time, Works 
 Rate and Actual Rate, are shown, but also the changes, which resulted in these values 
 as a result of variations in the length of the working day. 
 
 ' Total output is influenced by other circumstances, but they are unimportant in comparison 
 with the above. 
 
 t These values differ slightly, owing to the fact that, in calculating averages, values over ()?> 
 have been taken as I'D, whilst values less than 0'5 have been ignored. 
 
53 
 
 RATE OF WORKING IN NUMBER OF BOBBINS PER HOUR, CALCULATED (A) ON THE WORKS 
 TIME, AND (B) ON THE ACTUAL TIME WORKED, IN EACH DAILY PERIOD. 
 
 DAILY RESULTS AND AVERAGES FOR A GROUP OF EIGHT WORKERS (Nos. 12, 10, 14, 
 
 13, HA, 14B, 11, 8). 
 
 Works Time - 6.0-8.0 a.m. 
 
 2 hours. 
 
 8.30-12.30 4 hours. 
 
 1.30-5.30 p. in 4 hours. 
 
 6.0-8.0 p.ni 2 hours. 
 
 Actual Time Worked varies from day to day with each individual. 
 Works Rate = Number of bobbins divided by Works Time. 
 Actual Rate = Number of bobbins divided by Actual Time. 
 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 
 8.3012.30. 
 
 1.30 5.30. 
 
 6.0 s.o. 
 
 Worker's 
 No. 
 
 S / ~ N i ^ ^ 
 
 .9 f J .s 
 
 EH| CS EH -g 
 
 3 02 
 
 Ol 
 
 s 
 +t 
 
 1 
 
 rtj 
 
 .1? 
 
 - -/ S 32 
 
 37 
 
 1-1 3 
 
 
 a 
 
 B 
 M 
 
 1 7 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 J3.2 5 Is "*-S 
 
 |i 
 
 OD 
 
 O 
 
 "3 
 
 
 
 IJ 
 
 f - -' o T^ "^ 
 
 -2 | 5| 
 
 tc c 
 
 m 
 M 
 
 
 
 C5 
 
 "5 .S 
 - ~ 
 
 se 
 
 
 ~ > ^ ^^ 
 
 
 
 >3 
 
 
 E?^ - 
 
 ^ * 
 
 -(1 
 
 ^ 
 
 Tuesday, 25th January, 1916. 
 
 ' \ 
 12 ... 1 120 ' 281 
 
 312 
 
 108 
 
 240 
 
 351 
 
 374 
 
 234 
 
 240 
 
 256 
 
 261 
 
 235 
 
 120 
 
 207 
 
 239 
 
 1(4 
 
 10 
 
 120 198 
 
 216 110 
 
 240 
 
 235 
 
 245 
 
 230 
 
 240 
 
 216 
 
 224 
 
 232 
 
 12(1 
 
 208 
 
 227 
 
 lilt 
 
 14 
 
 120 186 
 
 194 115 
 
 240 
 
 222 
 
 227 
 
 235 
 
 240 
 
 270 
 
 281 
 
 231 
 
 120 
 
 259 
 
 299 
 
 104 
 
 i:5 
 
 120 i 178 
 
 178 
 
 120 
 
 240 
 
 172 
 
 175 
 
 236 
 
 240 
 
 191 
 
 197 
 
 232 
 
 120 
 
 164 
 
 178 
 
 110 
 
 14A ... 
 
 120 138 
 
 138 
 
 120 
 
 240 
 
 411 
 
 425 
 
 232 
 
 240 
 
 381 
 
 397 
 
 230 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14n ... 
 
 120 28G 
 
 327 
 
 105 
 
 240 
 
 15:', 
 
 163 
 
 225 
 
 240 
 
 182 
 
 185 
 
 236 
 
 120 
 
 230 
 
 262 
 
 105 
 
 11 
 
 120 1.J7 
 
 177 106 
 
 240 
 
 252 
 
 279 
 
 230 
 
 240 
 
 348 
 
 358 
 
 233 
 
 120 
 
 298 
 
 334 
 
 107 
 
 S ... 120 . 92 
 
 101 110 
 
 240 
 
 269 
 
 276 
 
 234 
 
 240 
 
 205 
 
 212 
 
 232 
 
 120 
 
 132 
 
 150 
 
 105 
 
 Total... WO 1,516 
 
 1,643 894 
 
 1,920 
 
 2,065 
 
 2,164 
 
 1,856 
 
 1,920 
 
 2,049 
 
 2,115 ' 
 
 1,861 
 
 960 
 
 1,498 
 
 1,689 
 
 745 
 
 Average 
 
 120 189 
 
 205 112 
 
 240 
 
 258 
 
 270 
 
 232 
 
 240 
 
 256 
 
 264 
 
 233 
 
 120 
 
 214 
 
 241 
 
 106 
 
 Wednesday, 26th January, 1916. 
 
 120 
 
 269 
 
 302 
 
 107 
 
 240 
 
 274 
 
 274 
 
 240 
 
 240 265 
 
 267 
 
 238 
 
 . 
 
 
 
 
 
 120 
 
 177 
 
 202 
 
 105 
 
 240 
 
 252 
 
 260 
 
 233 
 
 240 
 
 221 
 
 229 
 
 231 
 
 120 
 
 144 
 
 192 
 
 120 
 
 230 
 
 260 
 
 106 
 
 240 
 
 265 
 
 265 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 215 
 
 246 
 
 210 
 
 120 
 
 96 
 
 145 
 
 120 
 
 66 
 
 183 
 
 44 
 
 240 
 
 199 
 
 202 
 
 236 
 
 240 
 
 178 
 
 190 
 
 225 
 
 120 
 
 169 
 
 250 
 
 120 
 
 158 
 
 206 
 
 92 
 
 240 
 
 305 
 
 305 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 362 
 
 369 
 
 235 
 
 120 
 
 251 
 
 266 
 
 120 
 
 192 
 
 206 
 
 112 
 
 240 
 
 174 
 
 233 
 
 179 
 
 240 
 
 175 
 
 253 
 
 166 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 120 
 
 18S 
 
 237 
 
 95 
 
 240 
 
 279 
 
 283 
 
 236 
 
 240 
 
 317 
 
 328 
 
 232 
 
 120 
 
 183 
 
 196 
 
 120 
 
 107 
 
 144 
 
 89 
 
 240 
 
 213 
 
 216 
 
 236 
 
 240 
 
 282 
 
 285 
 
 235 
 
 120 
 
 208 
 
 238 
 
 960 
 
 1,387 
 
 1,740 
 
 750 
 
 1,920 
 
 1,961 
 
 2,038 
 
 1,840 
 
 1,920 
 
 2,015 
 
 2,167 
 
 1,772 
 
 720 
 
 1,051 
 
 1,287 
 
 120 
 
 173 
 
 217 
 
 94 
 
 240 
 
 245 
 
 255 
 
 230 
 
 240 
 
 252 
 
 271 
 
 221 
 
 120 
 
 175 
 
 214 
 
 Thursday, 27th January, 1916. 
 
 12 
 
 120 
 
 179 
 
 196 
 
 110 
 
 240 
 
 298 
 
 303 
 
 236 
 
 240 
 
 301 
 
 334 
 
 216 
 
 } 
 
 
 
 
 10 
 
 120 
 
 237 
 
 258 
 
 111 
 
 240 
 
 151 
 
 191 
 
 190 
 
 210 
 
 239 
 
 247 
 
 232 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14 
 
 120 
 
 101 
 
 304 
 
 10 
 
 240 
 
 148 
 
 274 
 
 130 
 
 240 
 
 198 
 
 234 
 
 203 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 13 
 
 120 
 
 98 
 
 109 
 
 108 
 
 240 
 
 159 
 
 232 
 
 165 
 
 240 
 
 160 
 
 181 
 
 212 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14A '... 
 
 120 
 
 321 
 
 244 
 
 78 
 
 240 
 
 331 
 
 331 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 256 
 
 270 
 
 228 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14B ... 
 
 11 
 
 120 
 
 202 
 
 220 
 
 110 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 '.17 
 247 
 
 116 
 
 305 
 
 200 
 195 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 185 
 264 
 
 200 
 384 
 
 222 
 182 
 
 
 ^ No 
 
 overti 
 
 me. 
 
 
 8 '... 
 
 120 
 
 99 
 
 297 
 
 40 
 
 240 
 
 190 
 
 224 
 
 204 
 
 240 
 
 158 
 
 173 
 
 220 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total ... 
 
 840 
 
 1,237 
 
 1,728 
 
 597 
 
 1,920 
 
 1,621 
 
 1,976 
 
 1,560 
 
 1,920 
 
 1,761 
 
 2,023 
 
 1,715 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 177 
 
 247 
 
 85 
 
 240 
 
 203 
 
 247 
 
 195 
 
 240 
 
 220 
 
 253 
 
 214 
 
 ; 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7S12 
 
 G 2 
 
52 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 s.:',o 12.30. 
 
 1.30f>.30. 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 Worker's 
 Number. 
 
 Work? Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 1 
 H 
 
 GO 
 | 
 
 
 
 Actual Rate. 
 
 Actual Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 Works Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 OJ 0) 
 
 -*J -M 
 
 
 
 GO ""i 
 ~ S 
 
 1 1 
 
 Actual Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 Works Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 5 
 
 C8 
 
 00 
 
 1 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 -2 
 
 c 
 
 W 
 'a 
 
 S 
 
 o 
 
 <! 
 
 Actual Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 OJ ' 0> ,-. 
 
 S2 i | S^ 
 H| (S S| 
 
 II 1 1 1| 
 
 ^ o ~S "S ^ 
 > ^ > 2 s - 
 ^ P < < 
 
 Friday, 28th January, 1916. 
 
 12 
 
 120 
 
 215 
 
 228 113 
 
 240 
 
 322 
 
 325 
 
 238 
 
 240 
 
 241 
 
 2f>2 
 
 230 
 
 120 
 
 220 
 
 242 
 
 101 
 
 Ki ... 
 
 120 
 
 102 
 
 109 
 
 113 
 
 240 
 
 245 
 
 253 
 
 233 
 
 240 216 
 
 227 
 
 228 
 
 120 
 
 163 
 
 194 
 
 101 
 
 14 ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _ 
 
 240 
 
 192 
 
 192 
 
 240 
 
 120 
 
 204 
 
 245 
 
 IOC 
 
 13 ... 
 
 120 
 
 214 
 
 234 
 
 110 
 
 240 
 
 236 
 
 248 
 
 228 
 
 240 
 
 236 
 
 217 
 
 150 
 
 120 
 
 167 
 
 196 
 
 102 
 
 UA ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 240 
 
 392 
 
 412 
 
 228 
 
 240 
 
 360 
 
 373 
 
 232 
 
 120 
 
 319 
 
 364 
 
 101 
 
 14B ... 
 
 120 
 
 233 
 
 250 
 
 112 
 
 240 
 
 239 
 
 240 
 
 239 
 
 240 
 
 200 
 
 204 
 
 234 
 
 120 201 
 
 271 
 
 8 
 
 11 ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 240 
 
 298 
 
 314 
 
 228 
 
 240 
 
 300 
 
 326 
 
 221 
 
 120 249 
 
 333 
 
 IK 
 
 8 
 
 120 
 
 195 
 
 209 
 
 112 
 
 240 
 
 192 
 
 200 
 
 231 
 
 240 
 
 171 
 
 182 
 
 226 
 
 120 
 
 157 
 
 179 
 
 10: 
 
 Total... 
 
 600 
 
 959 
 
 1,030 560 
 
 1,680 
 
 1,924 
 
 1,992 
 
 1,625 
 
 1,920 
 
 1,816 
 
 1,973 
 
 1,761 
 
 960 
 
 1,680 
 
 2,024 
 
 822 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 192 
 
 206 112 
 
 240 
 
 275 
 
 284 
 
 232 
 
 240 
 
 227 
 
 247 
 
 220 
 
 120 
 
 210 
 
 253 
 
 102 
 
 Saturday, 29th January, 1916. 
 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 8.3011.30. 
 
 
 
 12 ... 
 
 120 
 
 221 
 
 245 
 
 108 
 
 180 
 
 249 
 
 271 
 
 165 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 10 ... 
 
 120 
 
 217 
 
 258 
 
 101 
 
 180 
 
 202 
 
 278 
 
 160 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14 ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 180 
 
 201 
 
 256 
 
 140 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 13 ... 
 
 120 
 
 181 
 
 205 
 
 106 
 
 180 
 
 247 
 
 269 
 
 165 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14A ... 
 
 120 
 
 275 
 
 352 
 
 94 
 
 180 
 
 383 
 
 380 
 
 181 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14n . 
 
 120 
 
 212 
 
 273 
 
 93 
 
 180 
 
 124 
 
 212 
 
 105 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 120 
 
 112 
 
 175 
 
 77 
 
 180 
 
 192 
 
 216 
 
 160 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total... 
 
 720 
 
 1,218 
 
 1,508 
 
 579 
 
 1,260 
 
 1,598 
 
 1,882 
 
 1,076' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 203 
 
 251 
 
 96 
 
 180 
 
 228 
 
 269 
 
 154 
 
 -r- 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Monday, 31st January, 1916. 
 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 8.3012.30. 
 
 1.305.30. 
 
 6.0 8.0. 
 
 12 ... 
 
 120 
 
 94 
 
 226 50 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 _ 
 
 
 - - 
 
 
 10 ... 
 
 120 
 
 106 
 
 115 111 
 
 240 
 
 239 
 
 273 
 
 230 
 
 240 
 
 197 
 
 247 
 
 191 
 
 
 
 
 
 u ... 
 
 120 
 
 173 
 
 247 84 
 
 240 
 
 242 
 
 246 
 
 236 
 
 240 
 
 246 
 
 311 
 
 190 
 
 120 237 258 
 
 110 
 
 13 ... 
 
 120 
 
 144 
 
 157 110 
 
 240 
 
 180 
 
 199 
 
 217 
 
 240 
 
 224 
 
 269 
 
 200 
 
 120 149 
 
 210 
 
 85 
 
 14A ... 
 
 120 
 
 
 
 
 
 240 
 
 325 
 
 343 
 
 227 
 
 240 
 
 260 
 
 327 
 
 191 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 UB ... 
 
 120 
 
 198 
 
 258 
 
 92 
 
 240 
 
 218 
 
 225 
 
 232 
 
 240 
 
 214 
 
 255 
 
 202 
 
 120 242 
 
 280 
 
 104 
 
 11 ... 
 
 120 
 
 117 
 
 125 
 
 112 
 
 240 
 
 293 
 
 347 
 
 203 
 
 240 
 
 307 
 
 346 
 
 213 
 
 120 218 
 
 316 
 
 83 
 
 8 
 
 120 
 
 93 
 
 114 
 
 98 
 
 240 
 
 179 
 
 183 
 
 235 
 
 240 
 
 222 
 
 305 
 
 175 
 
 120 166 
 
 306 
 
 65 
 
 Total ... 
 
 960 
 
 925 
 
 1,242 
 
 657 
 
 1,680 
 
 1,676 
 
 1,816 
 
 1,580 
 
 1,680 
 
 1,670 
 
 2,060 
 
 1,362 
 
 61 iO 1,012 
 
 1,370 
 
 447 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 132 
 
 177 
 
 94 
 
 240 
 
 239 
 
 259 
 
 226 
 
 240 
 
 238 
 
 294 
 
 195 
 
 120 202 
 
 274 89 
 
DAILY AVERAGES AND AVERAGES FOR SUCCESSIVE WEEKS (OMITTING SATURDAYS) FOR 
 
 GROUP OF EIGHT WORKERS. 
 
 i 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 8.3012.30. 
 
 1.305.30. 
 
 6.08.0. 
 
 
 aJ x-x 
 ^ ' ^ <u ^ d 
 
 rl ^ 
 
 $ 
 
 fl. 
 
 17 s 
 
 Q,) 
 
 +- 2 oi 
 
 * ^ if 1 el / *" s 
 
 Date. 
 
 .35 1 | | 
 
 J | 
 
 "S 
 
 Pi 
 
 ^ B 
 
 H -w 
 
 a 
 
 A 
 
 i-H d) 
 
 ~ a; C6 C3 
 
 H-g Pi M r<~ 
 
 
 *~ g ' & 
 { ^ CO '""J ria C 
 
 J3 .9 ^ 
 
 "ca "5 .3 
 
 QQ 
 
 BD 
 
 1 "BJ 
 
 '& 5 2 ' "eg .S 
 
 i. M " ^5 
 
 
 55 5? fe -+5 -+^ 0^ 
 S> hP O ' C3 x_^ 
 
 T<S t. 
 
 o ** o 
 
 1 IS 
 
 E 
 
 O 
 
 1 |~ 
 
 |* 1 ! 1 1" 
 
 "> Jan. 
 
 6 
 7 
 8 ., 
 1 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 189 
 173 
 177 
 192 
 
 132 
 
 205 
 217 
 247 
 
 206 
 177 
 
 112 
 94 
 85 
 112 
 94 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 258 
 245 
 2C3 
 275 
 239 
 
 270 
 255 
 247 
 284 
 259 
 
 939 
 
 230 
 195 
 232 
 226 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 256 
 252 
 220 
 227 
 238 
 
 264 
 271 
 253 
 247 
 294 
 
 233 
 221 
 214 
 220 
 195 
 
 120 
 120 
 
 120 
 120 
 
 214 
 175 
 
 210 
 202 
 
 241 
 214 
 
 253 
 274 
 
 106 
 97 
 
 103 
 
 89 
 
 'otal... 
 
 600 
 
 863 
 
 1,052 
 
 497 
 
 ,200 
 
 1,220 
 
 1,315 
 
 1,115 
 
 ,200 
 
 1,193 
 
 1,329 
 
 1,083 
 
 480 
 
 801 
 
 982 
 
 395 
 
 iverage 
 
 120 
 
 173 
 
 210 
 
 99 
 
 240 
 
 244 
 
 263 
 
 223 
 
 240 
 
 239 
 
 266 
 
 217 
 
 120 
 
 200 
 
 245 
 
 99 
 
 IFeb. 
 
 2 
 3 
 4 
 
 7 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 193 
 
 199 
 189 
 186 
 175 
 
 258 
 234 
 286 
 226 
 242 
 
 90 
 101 
 79 
 100 
 92 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 233 
 
 263 
 220 
 
 248 
 248 
 
 270 
 280 
 251 
 262 
 
 283 
 
 207 
 226 
 217 
 229 
 210 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 230 
 249 
 263 
 241 
 224 
 
 260 
 274 
 
 292 
 275 
 245 
 
 212 
 
 220 
 218 
 216 
 219 
 
 120 
 120 
 
 120 
 
 209 
 175 
 
 187 
 
 238 
 274 
 
 248 
 
 52 
 
 77 
 
 89 
 
 "'otal... 
 
 600 
 
 942 
 
 1,246 
 
 462 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,212 
 
 1,346 
 
 1,089 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,207 
 
 1,346 
 
 1,085 
 
 360 
 
 5*71 
 
 760 
 
 218 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 188 
 
 249 
 
 92 
 
 240 
 
 242 
 
 269 
 
 218 
 
 240 
 
 241 
 
 269 
 
 217 
 
 120 
 
 190 
 
 253 
 
 73 
 
 8 Feb. 
 
 9 ,, 
 
 
 H 
 
 ** 1 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 218 
 218 
 212 
 232 
 190 
 
 270 
 
 288 
 234 
 278 
 239 
 
 97 
 92 
 105 
 102 
 96 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 241 
 238 
 239 
 268 
 236 
 
 266 
 265 
 
 258 
 284 
 255 
 
 218 
 216 
 221 
 ^226 
 226 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 214 
 226 
 235 
 259 
 221 
 
 228 
 253 
 256 
 281 
 
 262 
 
 225 
 
 216 
 220 
 220 
 206 
 
 1 
 [- Ove 
 
 rtime 
 
 nspen 
 
 ded. 
 
 fotal... 600 
 
 1,070 
 
 1,309 
 
 492 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,222 
 
 1,328 
 
 1,107 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,155 
 
 1,280 
 
 1,087 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 120 
 
 214 
 
 262 
 
 98 
 
 240 
 
 244 
 
 266 
 
 221 
 
 240 
 
 231 
 
 256 
 
 217 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 5 Feb. 
 6 
 
 L7 
 * -, 
 
 '* 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 239 
 221 
 212 
 201 
 115 
 
 278 
 281 
 272 
 273 
 
 239 
 
 103 
 99 
 93 
 86 
 
 59 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 250 
 263 
 275 
 244 
 220 
 
 274 219 
 284 224 
 281 229 
 280 210 
 245 i 216 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 232 
 243 
 219 
 224 
 215 
 
 270 
 272 
 
 256 
 285 
 249 
 
 208 
 215 
 207 
 192 
 207 
 
 - Ove 
 
 rtime 
 
 suspen 
 
 ded 
 
 Dotal ... 
 
 600 
 
 988 
 
 1,343 
 
 440 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,252 
 
 1,364 
 
 1,098 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,133 
 
 1,332 
 
 1,029 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 120 
 
 198 
 
 269 
 
 88 
 
 240 
 
 250 
 
 273 
 
 220 
 
 240 
 
 227 
 
 266 
 
 206 
 
 
 
 
 
 23 Feb. -i 
 
 it 
 
 a 
 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 293 
 
 299 
 
 314 224 
 
 346 213 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 257 
 
 257 
 
 308 
 
 284 
 
 202 
 219 
 
 " 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 n 
 c 
 
 
 240 
 
 268 
 
 307 213 
 
 240 
 
 245 
 
 283 
 
 206 
 
 
 
 
 
 '<) ,, 
 28 
 29 
 
 
 o 
 
 0) 
 & 
 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 201 
 241 
 
 333 157 
 300 197 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 202 
 214 
 
 245 
 251 
 
 196 
 205 
 
 \ Ove 
 
 rtime 
 
 suspei 
 
 ded. 
 
 O t/ ji 
 
 f 
 
 ^ 
 
 05 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total ... 
 
 
 cS 
 
 d 
 
 o 
 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,302 
 
 1,600 1,004 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,175 
 
 1,371 
 
 1,028 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 P^ 
 
 
 240 
 
 260 
 
 320 201 
 
 240 
 
 235 
 
 274 
 
 206 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 1 Mar. 
 
 3 ," 
 
 6 
 
 7 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 152 
 237 
 140 
 174 
 
 192 
 278 
 176 
 233 
 
 96 
 103 
 97 
 92 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 240 
 256 
 252 
 215 
 236 
 
 305 ] 193 
 269 228 
 265 229 
 229 226 
 249 228 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 214 
 258 
 237 
 225 
 203 
 
 247 
 
 269 
 247 
 237 
 227 
 
 209 
 230 
 230 
 227 
 216 
 
 }. Ove 
 
 ; rtime 
 
 suspe 
 
 ded. 
 
 Total... 
 
 480 
 
 703 
 
 879 388 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,199 1,317 i 1,104 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,137 1,227 
 
 1,112 
 
 
 
 
 Average 120 
 
 176 
 
 219-7 97 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 263 221 
 
 240 
 
 227 245 222 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 >. In week ending 29th February, lack of material caused loss of time. 
 
AVERAGE RATES PER HOUR, PER PERIOD FOR EIGHT WINDERS. 
 
 Period 1, overtime and early morning period worked. 
 Period 2, overtime suspended. 
 
 Period 3, overtime and early morning period suspended. 
 N.B. Periods 1 and 2 extend over two weeks each. 
 Period 3 extends over one week only. 
 
 
 6 8 a.m, 
 
 S.30a.m. 12.30 p.m. 
 
 1.30 5.30p.m. 
 
 (') 8 p.m. 
 
 Period. 
 
 1? 
 
 2 -2 17 
 
 03 3B 1 IT* <E 
 
 P> !-,-> 
 
 0) ^_^ 
 
 H j 
 
 p 
 
 1 
 M 
 
 # <P| 
 
 .3 o5 "Jj 
 
 1 
 
 If 
 
 a- o> w 
 .,* *- -*- 
 
 fi i^ CC C3 
 
 -^ M 
 
 
 
 P rf. 
 
 _, -,_, 
 
 -P.S 
 
 * jsj rt 03 .9 
 
 .y J3 
 
 rS 
 
 ^ cC 2 
 
 ^ - _S 
 
 
 
 ls.9 
 
 S C J[j "^ 
 
 "3 " 
 
 
 ^ P k ) 
 
 i_i *^ 
 
 _, 
 
 S 3 ^ 
 
 
 s 
 
 3 
 
 p i~ j 
 
 
 rr S 
 
 
 tSS e os 
 
 t? ' ^ 1 ^j <] 
 
 |e 
 
 O 
 
 
 !~ 
 
 |S 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 1* 
 
 -S' J 
 
 * ? <1 
 
 1" 
 
 Period 1 ... 
 
 120 
 
 180 
 
 229 
 
 95 
 
 240 
 
 243 
 
 266 
 
 220 
 
 240 
 
 240 267 217 
 
 120 195 ; 249 
 
 86 
 
 Period 2... 
 
 120 
 
 206 
 
 265 
 
 93 
 
 240 
 
 247 
 
 269 
 
 220 
 
 240 
 
 229 , 261 211 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period 3 ... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 240 
 
 260 
 
 320 
 
 201 
 
 240 
 
 235 274 206 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 AVERAGE RATE PER HOUR PER DAY FOR THE VARIOUS EXPERIMENTAL PERIODS. 
 
 Period. 
 
 
 
 Works Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 Works Rate. 
 
 Actual Rate. 
 
 Actual Time. 
 
 Experimental Period 1 
 
 720 
 
 214 
 
 253 
 
 618 
 
 Experimental Period 2 
 
 600 
 
 227 
 
 265 
 
 524 
 
 Experimental Period 3 ... 
 
 480 
 
 247 
 
 297 
 
 407 
 
 DAILY AVERAGES AND AVERAGES FOR SUCCESSIVE WEEKS (OMITTING SATURDAYS) FOR 
 
 GROUP OF THREE WINDERS, Nos. 13, 10, 8, 
 
 OVERTIME AND EARLY MORNING PERIOD WORKED. EXPERIMENTAL PERIOD 1. 
 
 
 6 8 a.m. 
 
 8.30 a.m. 12.30 p.m. 
 
 1.305.30 p.m. 
 
 6 8 p.m. 
 
 Date. 
 
 I? 
 
 i 
 
 -4~ 
 
 | 
 
 |o 
 
 | 
 
 D 
 
 -M 
 
 
 
 9 
 
 8 oa 
 
 9 
 
 -j 
 
 Qj 
 
 17 
 
 <u ^_^ 
 
 J3 
 
 
 
 * s~ 
 
 
 S a) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ Ql 
 
 
 CS 
 
 Ofl 
 
 
 
 P^ 
 
 M 
 
 w 
 
 "S 
 
 ^ "S 
 
 
 
 (Si 
 
 EH -M 
 
 r^ -w 
 
 (3 
 
 w 
 
 Ei-g 
 
 H -g 
 
 M 
 
 M 
 
 H -J; 
 
 
 ^ .S 
 
 CD 
 
 M 
 
 CS 
 
 3 .S 
 
 jjj 
 
 J3 
 
 'a 
 
 "3 fi 
 
 M 
 
 02 
 
 "3 
 
 >~-J rj 
 
 || 
 
 JS 
 
 "3 
 
 "3 . 
 
 
 I E 
 
 g 
 
 o 
 
 a 
 
 "S S/ 
 
 1* 
 
 o 
 
 o 
 
 is 
 
 ^>- "^^ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 O 
 
 "S 
 
 is 
 
 
 1 
 
 o 
 
 
 25 Jan. 
 
 120 
 
 156 
 
 165 
 
 113 
 
 240 
 
 225 
 
 232 
 
 233 
 
 240 
 
 204 i 211 
 
 232 
 
 120 
 
 168 
 
 185 
 
 10* 
 
 26 
 
 120 
 
 117 
 
 176 
 
 79 
 
 240 
 
 221 
 
 226 235 
 
 S40 
 
 227 235 
 
 230 
 
 1-20 
 
 . 174 
 
 227 
 
 9- 
 
 27 
 
 120 
 
 145 221 86 
 
 240 
 
 167 
 
 216 186 
 
 240 
 
 186 200 
 
 221 
 
 120 
 
 No 
 
 overti 
 
 me. 
 
 28 
 
 120 
 
 170 , 184 112 
 
 240 
 
 224 
 
 234 231 
 
 240 
 
 208 209 
 
 201 
 
 120 
 
 162 
 
 190 
 
 10? 
 
 31 
 
 120 
 
 114 
 
 129 
 
 106 
 
 240 
 
 199 
 
 218 227 
 
 240 
 
 214 274 
 
 189 
 
 120 
 
 157 
 
 258 
 
 7. r 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total ... 
 
 600 
 
 702 
 
 875 
 
 496 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,036 
 
 1,126 
 
 1,112 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,039 
 
 1,12!) 
 
 1,073 
 
 600 
 
 661 
 
 860 
 
 37f 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 140 
 
 175 
 
 99 
 
 240 
 
 207 
 
 225 222 
 
 240 
 
 208 226 
 
 215 
 
 120 
 
 165 
 
 215 
 
 94 
 
 1 Feb. 
 
 120 172 
 
 234 
 
 94 
 
 240 
 
 216 
 
 249 
 
 208 
 
 240 
 
 217 246 
 
 212 
 
 120 
 
 159 
 
 211 47 
 
 g 
 
 120 
 
 167 199 
 
 99 
 
 240 
 
 238 
 
 256 
 
 224 
 
 240 
 
 214 228 
 
 225 
 
 120 
 
 170 
 
 315 6: 
 
 3 ,, 
 
 120 
 
 168 267 
 
 76 
 
 240 
 
 226 
 
 244 
 
 230 
 
 240 
 
 238 259 
 
 222 
 
 N 
 
 o over 
 
 time. 
 
 4 
 
 120 
 
 167 201 
 
 101 
 
 240 
 
 216 
 
 227 
 
 229 
 
 240 
 
 185 247 
 
 197 
 
 120 
 
 129 
 
 186 8; 
 
 7 
 
 120 198 i 226 
 
 106 
 
 240 
 
 248 
 
 286 
 
 208 
 
 240 
 
 198 230 
 
 208 
 
 N|0 overtime. 
 
 Total:.. 
 
 600 872 
 
 1,127 
 
 476 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,144 
 
 1,262 [ 1,099 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,052 1,210 
 
 1,064 
 
 360 
 
 458 
 
 712 
 
 191 
 
 Average 
 
 120 174 225 
 
 95 
 
 240 
 
 229 
 
 252 220 
 
 240 
 
 210 242 
 
 213 
 
 120 
 
 153 
 
 237 6 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
55 
 
 OUTPUT DAILY AVERAGES -THREE WINDERS, Nos. 13, 10, 8. 
 OVERTIME SUSPENDED. EXPERIMENTAL PERIOD 2. 
 
 
 68 
 
 u in. 
 
 S.30 a.m. 12.30 p.m. 
 
 1.305.30 p.m. 
 
 (i 8 p.m. 
 
 
 
 
 aJ 
 
 
 1* ,--". 
 
 B^ 
 
 . 
 
 u 
 
 oJ 
 
 0> 
 
 a 7 -^ 
 
 g 
 
 S 7 
 
 So 
 
 -t -f 
 
 37 
 
 Date. 
 
 .a o> 
 
 "5 
 X 
 
 A 
 
 ^ 5 
 
 ll * 
 
 & 
 
 - a, 
 
 OJ -S 
 pH -*< 03 
 O 
 
 i 
 
 
 P| 
 
 ol M 
 
 00 
 
 
 
 Is 
 
 ED 
 -M 
 
 O 
 
 ^ 
 s 
 
 "8 
 
 J 
 
 
 M 
 
 o 
 
 a 
 a 
 
 o 
 
 p 
 
 1^ 1 
 
 3 
 
 P 
 
 r- 
 
 1 
 
 ^0 
 
 s 
 -M 
 
 I C 
 
 8 Feb. 
 
 >' 
 
 .0 
 
 ' > 
 
 4 
 
 120 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 120 
 
 220 
 218 
 185 
 198 
 
 205 
 
 260 
 288 
 
 211 
 223 
 248 
 
 101 
 
 92 
 
 107 
 106 
 
 97 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 222 
 224 
 
 220 
 232 
 
 2 it; 
 
 249 
 258 
 243 
 250 
 241 
 
 216 
 209 
 217 
 221 
 223 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 219 
 22S 
 217 
 244 
 213 
 
 230 
 256 
 233 
 269 
 233 
 
 228 
 216 
 223 
 218 
 220 
 
 - No 
 
 overti 
 
 me. 
 
 
 rotal... 
 
 600 
 
 1,026 
 
 1,230 
 
 503 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,114 
 
 1,241 
 
 1,086 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,121 
 
 1,221 
 
 1,105 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 205 
 
 246 
 
 101 
 
 240 223 
 
 248 
 
 217 
 
 240 
 
 224 
 
 244 
 
 221 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 .5 Feb. 
 
 18 " 
 
 21 ,. 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 235 
 227 
 213 
 
 170 
 
 131 
 
 283 
 283 
 
 270 
 248 
 
 207 
 
 100 
 
 107 
 96 
 81 
 
 76 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 235 
 238 
 244 
 236 
 204 
 
 249 
 245 
 237 
 255 
 229 
 
 227 
 231 
 226 
 221 
 215 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 210 
 215 
 185 
 208 
 230 
 
 246 
 
 237 
 208 
 254 
 263 
 
 205 
 
 219 
 219 
 198 
 209 
 
 1 
 - No 
 
 overt 
 
 me. 
 
 
 Fotal ... 
 
 600 
 
 976 
 
 1,291 
 
 460 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,157 
 
 1,215 
 
 1,123 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,048 
 
 1,208 
 
 1,050 
 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 195 
 
 258 
 
 92 
 
 240 231 243 
 
 225 
 
 240 
 
 210 
 
 242 
 
 210 
 
 
 
 
 
 OUTPUT DAILY AVERAGES THREE WINDERS, Nos. 13, 10, 8. 
 
 EARLY MORNING PERIOD AND OVERTIME SUSPENDED, 23RD FEBRUARY 29-m FEBRUARY, 
 
 1916. EXPERIMENTAL PERIOD 3. 
 
 
 6 8 a.m. 
 
 8.30 a.m. 12.30 p.m. 
 
 1.305.30 p.m. 
 
 6 8 p.m. 
 
 Date. 
 
 a7 | 
 
 1 
 
 a7 
 
 a7 
 
 S -2 
 
 oJ 
 'a 
 
 Qj 
 
 "S is 
 
 o i 
 
 aj li 
 1 1 
 
 a M 
 
 IB 
 
 a 7 
 
 QJ 1* ( / ""T 
 
 -*-* c3 i 
 
 el 03 | 
 
 
 H 23 
 
 03 p M 
 
 
 
 1-1 s 
 
 S 
 
 X 
 
 _M 
 
 3 -3.S 
 
 J3.S 
 
 M " 
 
 "3-2 
 
 tc 
 
 _s 3 , "s-2 
 
 
 
 rl ^ 
 
 
 2 - - 
 
 
 M 
 
 
 
 
 
 c C- 
 
 
 ^J ^/ 
 
 !*~ 
 
 ,0 C 
 
 ^ 
 
 o -g 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 < < 
 
 23 Feb. 
 ''4 
 
 1 
 
 
 T3 
 
 r 
 
 1 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 
 269 
 268 
 
 289 
 325 
 
 223 
 
 214 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 226 
 254 
 
 287 
 
 268 
 
 193 
 
 227 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 .S 
 
 
 240 
 
 287 
 
 333 
 
 214 
 
 240 
 
 .'57 
 
 278 
 
 222 
 
 
 
 
 28 ., 
 29 
 
 I 
 
 r 
 
 -^ 
 3 - 
 
 ^ t;. 
 
 i 
 
 2-lo 
 240 
 
 178 
 225 
 
 272 
 255 
 
 156 
 209 
 
 240 
 210 
 
 209 
 
 243 
 
 241 
 271 
 
 205 
 216 
 
 N.. 
 
 overti ait-. 
 
 
 To t;d... 
 
 
 O 
 
 'A 
 
 Q 
 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,227 
 
 1,474 
 
 1,016 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,189 
 
 1,345 
 
 1,063 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 j 
 
 
 " 
 
 i 
 
 240 
 
 245 
 
 295 
 
 203 
 
 240 
 
 238 
 
 269 
 
 213 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 1 Mar. 
 
 P !> 
 
 6 ,. 
 7 ,, 
 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 120 
 
 170 
 237 
 140 
 173 
 
 204 
 278 
 176 
 200 
 
 101 
 103 
 97 
 102 
 
 240 
 240 
 2JO 
 240 
 240 
 
 240 
 253 
 260 
 209 
 226 
 
 282 
 264 
 266 
 222 
 
 237 
 
 201 
 231 
 235 
 226 
 
 228 
 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 240 
 
 233 
 
 268 
 246 
 197 
 215 
 
 1 
 
 263 
 
 283 
 255 
 211 
 241 
 
 214 
 
 228 
 231 
 224 
 214 
 
 1 
 No overti me. 
 
 
 Total... 
 
 480 
 
 720 S5,s 
 
 403 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,188 
 
 1,271 
 
 1,124 
 
 1,200 
 
 1,159 
 
 1,253 
 
 . 1,111 
 
 
 
 
 Average 
 
 120 
 
 180 214 
 
 101 
 
 240 
 
 238 
 
 254 
 
 225 
 
 240 
 
 232 
 
 251 
 
 222 
 
 J 
 
 
 
AVKKAGI: RATKS PER HOUR PKR I'KRIOD FOK THRKK WINDKKS. Nos. 13, 10, 
 
 Period 1, overtime and early morning period worked. 
 
 Period 2, overtime suspended. 
 
 Period 3, overtime and early morning period suspended. 
 
 N.B. Periods 1 and 2 extend over two weeks each. 
 Period 3 extends over one week onlv. 
 
 
 6 8 a.m. 
 
 8.30 a.m. 12.30 p.m. 
 
 1.30 -5 30 p.m. 
 
 6 8 p.m. 
 
 Period. 
 
 I'? 
 
 OJ 
 
 ^ 1 
 
 c3 : w TO 
 
 a / 
 
 
 
 ci 
 
 s 
 
 OS 
 
 17 
 
 a ! 
 
 $ 
 
 38 
 
 1 
 
 o 
 
 CO 
 
 .5 M 
 
 2 /-M ' i ^ 
 
 d .*a 1 -*j 3 
 
 P cc ed rf C a 
 
 
 
 M 5 
 
 ^-* a? 
 
 r" 1 "^ 
 ' ~ 
 
 (2 
 
 M 
 
 CH -8 
 
 
 
 OQ 
 
 
 -t- 
 
 3i iT i 
 
 
 M ^ ^ 
 
 _ 
 
 
 B 
 
 ^_ 
 
 ^ O 
 
 ^ 3 
 
 OD 
 
 ^ - 
 
 ' "3 
 
 fc d 
 
 00 
 
 ^-. B 
 
 
 ,44.2 
 
 t, 
 
 g "rt.9 
 
 _M ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 D 
 
 "=* .3 
 
 OD J 
 
 
 5 
 
 g.2 
 
 j -S 
 
 B 
 
 g .g 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 1 
 
 O ~t> ^^ 
 
 |* 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 1^ 
 
 o * 
 
 & " 
 
 _ 
 
 o 
 
 1^ 
 
 1- 
 
 .0 
 
 r tr ' 
 
 ^ oC 
 < <j 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period 1 ... 
 
 120 
 
 157 
 
 200 : 97 
 
 240 218 
 
 238 
 
 221 
 
 240 
 
 209 
 
 234 214 
 
 120 
 
 159 22C 79 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period 2... 
 
 120 
 
 200 
 
 252 
 
 96 
 
 240 
 
 227 
 
 245 
 
 221 
 
 240 
 
 217, 
 
 243 
 
 215 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period 3... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 240 
 
 245 
 
 295 
 
 203 
 
 240 238 
 
 269 
 
 213 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 AVERAGE RATES PER HOUR PER DAY FOR THE VARIOUS PERIODS. 
 
 Period. 
 
 Works Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 Works Kate. 
 
 Actual Rate. 
 
 Actual Time. 
 (Minutes.) 
 
 Experimental Period 1 
 
 720 
 
 186 
 
 224 
 
 Gil 
 
 Experimental Period 2 
 
 600 
 
 215 
 
 247 
 
 532 
 
 Experimental Period 3 
 
 480 
 
 241 
 
 282 
 
 416 
 
 In the Tables the averages of the group of eight individuals have been taken.' 
 In Experimental Period 1 the working day consisted of twelve hours divided into 
 
 Daily Period 1.- Early Morning Period 2 hours. 
 
 Daily Period 2. Morning Period 4 hours. 
 
 Daily Period 3. Afternoon Period ... ... ... 4 hours. 
 
 Daily Period 4.^ Overtime Period 2 hours. 
 
 For convenience, these are referred to as Daily Periods 1, 2, 3, 4. 
 The workers are indicated by numbers given in the first column. 
 
 The Tables deal with each period of the day separately, and in each period four 
 columns of figures appear. The first of these gives the number of minutes contained 
 in the Works Time for that particular period. This value is constant for the period, 
 and is the same for all individuals. The second column gives the Works Rate, and 
 the third column the Actual Rate, whilst the last column gives the minutes actually 
 worked (Actual Time). It is possible to ascertain at a glance the rate at which any 
 particular operative was working in any period of the day, and further, to ascertain 
 the exact number of minutes devoted to labour during that period. For instance, it 
 is seen that on 25th January, two individuals only out of a group of eight worked 
 for the full two hours during the early morning period, whilst for the rest of the 
 day, not a single individual worked full time. 
 
 The general scheme of the experiment may be understood by a study of a single 
 example. On the first day, 25th January, 1916, Worker No. 12 during Daily 
 Period 1, worked a total of 108 minutes (Actual Time) instead of the full 120 minutes 
 of the period (Works Time). Her output, divided by the Actual Time, gives 312 
 bobbins per hour (Actual Rate). Divided by the Works Time, it gave 281 bobbins 
 per hour (Works Rate). During Daily Period No. 2, she worked 234 minutes (Actual 
 Time) instead of 240 minutes (Works'Time). Her Actual Rate was 374, the Works 
 Rate being 351. In Daily Period No. 3, she worked 235 minutes (Actual Time) 
 
instead of 240 minutes (Works Time), and her Actual Rate was 261, the Works Rate 
 being 256. In Daily Period No. 4 (Overtime), she worked 104 minutes (Actual 
 Time) instead of 120 (Works Time), and the Actual Rate was 239. Works Rate was 
 207. 
 
 The remaining examinees have worked for varying numbers of minutes in the 
 different periods of the day, their output has varied, and thus differences in Works 
 Rate and Actual Rate have arisen. The average Works Time for each Daily Period 
 is the same as the original Works Time, since this has not changed during the 
 experiment.* The Works Rate for Daily Period 1 has varied from a maximum of 
 286 in the case of Worker No. 14s to a minimum of 92 in the case of Worker No. 8. 
 The average of the eight workers is 189. The Actual Rate has varied from 327 to 
 101, the average being 205. Actual Time has varied from 120 minutes, which is full 
 Works Time, to 105 minutes, the average for all workers being 112. Where actual 
 Time happens to be the same as Works Time, Actual Rate will necessarily be the 
 same as Works Rate. And so on with the various Daily Periods. 
 
 The full tables make it possible to compare values given by one worker with those 
 given by another, and the values given by the same worker in different periods of the 
 day. The averages allow a comparison to be made between different periods. 
 
 In consequence of the limitations of space it has only been possible to print the 
 full tables giving figures for individuals for the first week. For the remainder of 
 the time, summaries only are given. The figures given are averages for the group of 
 eight workers. 
 
 The figures bring out clearly the fact that the output varies in different periods 
 of the day. They also show that these variations may be due to different causes, a 
 rise in daily output being brought about on the one hand by an increase in the rate of 
 working, the time worked remaining the same or at all events not falling sufficiently 
 to compensate for the increased rate, or on the other hand, by an increase in the time 
 worked, the rate remaining the same, or at all events not falling sufficiently to 
 compensate for the increased time. 
 
 Thus, on the day already studied, 25th January, the average Actual Rate varies 
 from 205 in Daily Period 1 to 270 in Daily Period 2. In the afternoon, Daily 
 Period 3, it dropped to 264, and during overtime, Daily Period 4, to 241. The Works 
 Rate on the same day varied from 189 in Daily Period 1 to 258 in Daily Period 2, 
 dropping to 256 in Daily Period 3, and to 214 in Daily Period 4. On this day output 
 was lowest in Daily Period 1, highest in Daily Period 2, though, since both Actual 
 Rate and Actual Time were very similar in Daily Periods 2 and 3, the output of these 
 periods differed but little. 
 
 On other days, output is lowest in overtime, Daily Period 4. For instance, on 
 2nd February, Works Rate is 199 for Daily Period 1, 175 for Daily Period 4. In 
 most cases, however, the results show a lower Works Rate in the Daily Period 1, than 
 in overtime, Daily Period 4 (25th January, 26th January, 28th January, 31st 
 January, 1st February, 4th February). In many cases the Works Rate is lower in 
 Daily Period 1 than in any other period of the day (25th January, 26th, 27th, 28th, 
 29th and 31st January, 1st February, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 10th, llth, 12th, 16th, 17th, 
 18th, 19th, and 22nd February, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th March). 
 
 The weekly averages for these periods, Saturday values being omitted, are as 
 follows : First week, Daily Period 1, 173, Daily Period 4, 200. Second week, Daily 
 Period 1, 188, Daily Period 4, 190. In the third week, Daily Period 4 was abolished. 
 
 The values for Daily Periods 3 and 4 are as a rule higher than those for Daily 
 Periods 1 and 4; those for the first week were 244 and 239, for the second week 242 
 and 241, for the third week 244 and 231, &c. The Actual Rates are also considerably 
 higher in the Daily Periods 2 and 3, being 263 and 266 for the first week, 269 and 
 269 for the second week. 
 
 The Actual Time seems to be as a rule slightly higher in Daily Period 2 than 
 in 3, being 223 and 217 in the first week, 218 and 217 in the second week, 221 and 217 
 in the third week, and 220 and 206 in the fourth week. In the fifth week there was 
 a change to 201 and 206, and in the sixth week to 221 and 222. 
 
 The values for Actual Time in Daily Periods 2 and 3 also show a higher ratio to 
 Works Time than do the Actual Times in Daily Periods 1 and 4, showing a smaller 
 loss of time in these periods. 
 
 * Except on 1st February, when Daily Period 4 consisted of one hour instead of two, in 
 consequence of a Zeppelin raid. 
 
 7312 
 
58 
 
 
 
 Thus the results bear out the conclusions with regard to daily periods of high 
 and low output which were formed in studying output on a former occasion (p. 43). 
 
 The main object of the present experiment was to ascertain what differences in 
 time worked, in output, and in rate of working, were brought about as a result of 
 alterations in the length of the working day. At the beginning of the experiment 
 the hours were from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m., 8.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m., 1.30 p.m. to 5.30 p.m., 
 and 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. Thus the worker's day at the mill commenced at 6 a.m., finished 
 at 8 p.m., and consisted of fourteen hours, of which twelve were devoted to labour, 
 and two to rest and refreshment. These hours had been worked since the 3rd of 
 August, 1914. The arrangement remained unaltered during the first period of 
 two weeks of the experiment. During the second period of two weeks the number of 
 hours in Daily Periods 1, 2, and 3, were the same as for the first period, but Daily 
 Period 4 (overtime) was abolished. Thus, the working day, previously consisting of 
 twelve hours, was reduced to ten.* The gain to the workers was two and a half 
 hours, since the tea interval, as well as two hours overtime, was saved. 
 
 Daily Period 4 is worked in the evening, at the end of the day's labour, when 
 fatigue accumulation is most rapid (see p. 22). Hence the abolition of this period 
 might be expected to cause a considerable alteration of values. The Table of Daily 
 Averages, p. 53, shows that with the suspension of Daily Period 4 the Works Rate 
 in Period 1 went up in the next two weeks from 173 and 188 to 214 and 198. The 
 Actual Rate altered from 210 and 249 to 262 and 269. The Actual Time fell slightly, 
 from 99 and 92, to 98 and 88. That this was not sufficient to neutralize the rise in 
 Actual Rate is shown by the fact that the Works Rate also shows an increase. In 
 Daily Period 2 the Works Rate went up from 244 and 242 to 244 and 250. The 
 Actual Rate went up from 263 and 269 to 266 and 273. The Actual Time remained 
 stationary, the figures being 223 and 218, and 221 and 220. In the afternoon, Daily 
 Period 3, the Works Rate went down from 239 and 241 to 231 and 227. The Actual 
 Rate also went down slightly, from 266 and 269 to 256 and 266. The Actual Time 
 also fell from 217' and 217 to 217 and 206. At the end of the fourth week a further 
 change was made, and Daily Period 1, 6-8 a.m., was suspended, in addition to Daily 
 Period 4. Thus the working day consisted of eight hours only. The gain to the 
 workers over the second two weeks period (Experimental Period 2) was two and a half 
 hours, since the breakfast interval, as well as the two hours shift, was saved. The 
 gain over the first two weeks period (Experimental Period 1) was five hours. The 
 overtime period, during which fatigue accumulation is especially active, and the early 
 morning period, which has been seen to interfere with rest and feeding arrangements, 
 were not worked, and, accordingly, alterations in the remaining periods might 
 reasonably be looked for. 
 
 In Experimental Periods 1 and 2 (the first two weeks, and the second two weeks 
 of the experiment) the Works Rate for Daily Period 2 had been 244 and 242, and 244 
 and 250. In Experimental Period 3, after the suspension of the early morning shift, 
 this rose to 260. The Actual Rate, which had been 263 and 269, and 266 and 273, 
 rose to 320. The Actual Time, which had been 223 and 218, and 221 and 220, fell to 
 201. 
 
 In Daily Period 3, the Works Rate which in Experimental Periods 1 and 2 had 
 been 239 and 241, and 231 and 227, was 235. The Actual Rate, which had been 266 
 and 269, and 256 and 266, was 274. The Actual Time, which had been 217 and 217, 
 and 217 and 206, was 206. 
 
 Owing to the exigencies of the mill it was impossible to continue the suspension 
 of Daily Period 1 beyond the fifth week, and therefore the averages are calculated 
 on one half of the values used in the other Experimental Periods. 
 
 In the Table on p. 54, Average Rates per Hour per Period, the results have been 
 further summarised and are given in the form of a Table of Daily Average Rates for 
 the three Experimental Periods 1, 2, and 3. The Works Rate for Daily Period 1 is 
 180 in Experimental Period 1, in Experimental Period 2, 206. Thus the shortening 
 of the day has raised the rate of output by 26 bobbins per hour.. The Actual Rate also 
 has risen from 229 to 265, whilst the Actual Time has fallen from 95 to 93, a loss of 
 two minutes only. In Daily Period 2 the Works Rate for Experimental Period 1 is 
 243, for Experimental Period 2, 247, and for Experimental Period 3, 260, the Actual 
 Rates being for Experimental Period 1, 266, for Experimental Period 2, 269, and 
 
 ' The three periods of the experiment are referred to as Experimental Periods 1, 2, and 3. 
 
59 
 
 for Experimental Period 3, 320. The Actual Time for Experimental Periods 1 and 
 '2 was 220, for Experimental Period 3, 201. 
 
 In Daily Period 3 the Works Rate was 240 in Experimental Period 1, 229 in 
 Experimental Period 2, and 235 in Experimental Period 3. The fall from Experi 
 t;:<Mital Period 1 is partly due to a scarcity of material. The Actual Rates were for 
 Kvperimental Period 1, 267, for Experimental Period 2, 261, and for Experimental 
 Period 3, 274, the Actual Times being 217, 211, and 206. 
 
 Finally, by taking the average for each Experimental Period, the average rate 
 pec hour per day may be found (see Table, p. 54, Average Rates per Hour per Day). 
 The results are for Experimental Period 1, Works Rate 214, Actual Rate 253, for 
 Kxperimental Period 2, Works Rate 227, Actual Rate 265; for Experimental 
 Period 3, Works Rate 247, Actual Rate 297. 
 
 The above results were obtained from a group of eight workers. The number 
 was chosen in order to eliminate individual differences as much as possible. Certain 
 members .of the group were somewhat irregular in their attendance. Indeed, one 
 worker, at all events, made no pretence of attending in the early morning period, 
 lint habitually arrived at 8.30 instead of at 6. Such absences were found to interfere 
 with the value of the tests, and it is evident that if a considerable percentage of the 
 workers absented themselves from early morning period and overtime the formal 
 suspension of these periods would make little difference to their work, whilst changes 
 shown by other workers in consequence of such suspension would be masked in the 
 averages. For this reason a further Table has been constructed from the values of 
 three individuals who attended with remarkable regularity. In this Table, p. 56, 
 the values for Works Rate in Daily Period 1 are, for Experimental Period 1, 157, 
 for Experimental Period 2, 200. The Actual Rates are 200 and 252. and the Actual 
 Times 97 and 96. In Daily Period 2, Works Rate for Experimental Period 1 was 
 218. for Experimental Period 2, 227, and for Experimental Period 3, 245. The 
 Actual Rates were 238, 245, and 295. The Actual Time was 221, 221, and 203. In 
 Daily Period 3 the Works Rate for Experimental Period 1 was 209, for Experimental 
 Period 2, 217, and for Experimental Period 3, 238. Actual Rates were 234, 243, 
 and 269, and Actual Times 214, 215, 213. 
 
 Taking the average of the periods as before, the results are for Experimental 
 Period 1, Works Rate 186, far Experimental Period 2, 215, and for Experimental 
 Period 3, 241. The Actual Rates are for Experimental Period 1, 224, for Experi- 
 mental Period 2, 247, and for Experimental Period 3, 282. 
 
 As might have been expected, the Works Rate has gone up with each shortening 
 o!' the working day. The ultimate result as regards total output will depend upon 
 the ratio which this increase bears to the reduction in hours which has been effected. 
 Some of the conclusions reached are as follows : 
 
 Works Time is constant over limited periods. It is altered occasionally 
 by the introduction, or the suspension, of periods of overtime. It is always 
 greater than Nominal Time or Actual Time. It has varied during the period 
 covered by the experiment between eight hours and twelve hours per day. 
 
 Nominal Time is less than Works Time, though greater than Actual Time. 
 Its proportion to these two values varies in accordance with the length of 
 Works Time. It may vary owing to absences resulting from fluctuations in the 
 health or energy of the worker, from accident, or from other cause. It may 
 differ considerably from Works Time in consequence of the deliberate action 
 of individual workers. 
 
 Actual Time is less than Works Time or Nominal Time. The losses 
 constituting the difference between Nominal Time and Actual Time are small 
 in themselves, but the aggregate is large. The relation of Actual Time 
 to Works Time and Nominal Time has varied in sympathy with altera- 
 tions in Works Time. Labour performed towards the end of the day is 
 especially effective in diminishing Actual Time, owing to the great amount of 
 fatigue produced. 
 
 The losses in Nominal Time and in Actual Time, though always present, are 
 by no means constant in amount. They vary largely, and the chief cause of such 
 variation appears to be the condition of the worker with regard to fatigue. Condi- 
 tions which favour the development of fatigue result in an increase of the absences 
 sufficiently prolonged to lead to official registration, and still more to an increase 
 of the small losses which make up the difference between Nominal Time and Actual 
 
 Ti 
 ime. 
 
 7312 
 
60 
 
 Rates of Working also vary both in the case of different workers, and also in the 
 case of individual workers at different times of the day. Rates also vary as a result 
 of changed conditions. Reference to some of these points has been made on a former 
 page. Of especial interest in connection with output is the fact that every alteration 
 in the length of the working day has been followed by a corresponding alteration 
 in the rate of actual working. 
 
 From what has been said it follows that under ordinary circumstances every 
 increase in Works Time will be followed by an increase in Nominal Time, and an 
 increase in Actual Time, but successive increases in Works Time will lead to 
 diminishing increases in Nominal Time and Actual Time, since small time-losses 
 will be multiplied. Ultimately a condition will be reached when increased Works 
 Time no longer leads to increased Actual Time, but may even lead to a diminution. 
 
 Moreover, every increase in Actual Time, and therefore (under ordinary condi- 
 tions) every increase in Works Time and in Nominal Time, will lead to a diminution 
 of Actual'Rate, and this diminution will be especially marked as the result of the 
 introduction of overtime. 
 
 It is for this reason that the introduction of overtime frequently leads to a 
 diminution of total output. 
 
 S ti tin/wry of Section III. (Hi.). 
 
 A. The total output of a factory depends upon 
 
 1. Works Time. The official hours of the mill. 
 
 2. Nominal Time. The average time during which the workers attend. 
 
 3. Actual Time. The average time actually worked. 
 
 4. Actual Rate. The average rate at which work is performed. 
 
 B. Changes in 1 will lead to changes in 2 and 3, and every change of 3 will 
 cause a change of 4. Moreover, since 4, as well as 2 and 3, depends on fatigue, and 
 fatigue accumulation is greatly affected by 1,* the value of 4 will also be affected by 
 variations of 1. 
 
 Thus, the various factors are linked closely together, and an alteration of one 
 will be followed by alterations throughout the series. 
 
 C. It follows that the attainment of maximum output is a matter of the 
 accurate adjustment of the factors concerned, based upon exhaustive investigation 
 and patient experiment. 
 
 The principal factors to be considered are the actual time worked, and the actual 
 rate of working. 
 
 (iv.) THE INFLUENCE OF OVERTIME UPON THE GENERAL 
 
 HEALTH OF THE WORKER. 
 
 The influence of overtime upon the general health of the worker, apart from 
 his condition with regard to fatigue at any particular moment, is of importance, 
 since speed of working, and the endurance necessary for prolonged labour, must 
 depend upon general health. It is difficult to find a satisfactory means of gauging 
 and of expressing in numerical terms, this general health, or " fitness." The condi- 
 tion is difficult to define, and still more difficult to measure and to register. More- 
 over, the individuals met with vary so much amongst themselves that a condition 
 which might perhaps be called " fit " in one case, would be quite " unfit " in another. 
 
 An attempt has been made to solve the difficulty by collecting and analysing the 
 results of certain tests carried on over a period of some weeks, during which the 
 conditions with regard to overtime and the early morning period were varied. As in 
 former tests it was found undesirable to compare the results given by one individual 
 with those given by another the variations referred to above destroy, for present 
 purposes, the value of any such comparison but the results obtained at one period 
 
 F This is compensated to some extent by the process of " balancing." See p. 48. 
 Conditions vary in different factories, and imperfect co-ordination may lead to serious losses of 
 time. It is assumed that such losses have been excluded. 
 
61 
 
 have been compared with the results obtained at another period from the same 
 individual, and thus it has been possible to form an estimate of the influence of 
 varying conditions of labour. 
 
 The values taken are the averages between the morning and evening figures. 
 The abolition of overtime, leading, as it does, to a shortened day, would naturally 
 be followed by an improvement in the evening condition of the worker, but by 
 averaging the evening value with that obtained in the morning, the effect of the 
 shortened day is diminished, and the condition of the worker in the morning, after a 
 period of rest, is brought in. 
 
 The first test used was the Complex Reaction Time, and this was applied to three 
 individuals, No. 35A, 33, and 35, who had been remarked as especially regular in their 
 attendance at the mill. The experiment was carried on for a period of six weeks, 
 the conditions being varied from time to time. During the first fortnight the hours 
 worked were the full ordinary hours of the mill in war time, that is to say, from 
 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. with two hours off for meals. Thus the day consisted of twelve 
 working hours, and the operatives showed some signs of overstrain. During the 
 second fortnight the overtime period (6 p.m. to 8 p.m.) was suspended, the day 
 commenced at 6 a.m. and ended at 5.30 p.m. and consisted of ten working hours. 
 During the third stage of the experiment the early morning period also was sus- 
 pended and the day commenced at 8.30 a.m., ended at 5.30 p.m., and consisted of 
 eight working hours. 
 
 Taking the first individual tested, No. 35A, the average time of response for the 
 first fortnight, Period I, during the whole of which both overtime and early morning 
 period were worked in a twelve hour day, was 117 seconds. During Period II, when 
 overtime was suspended and the day contained ten working hours, the average time 
 was reduced to 0'89 seconds, and during Period III, when the early morning period 
 also was suspended and the day contained only eight working hours, the time of 
 response fell to 88 seconds. 
 
 The second individual tested was No. 33. During Period I, when overtime was 
 worked, the average value for the whole fortnight was 1 05 seconds, for Period II, 
 when overtime was suspended 87, and for Period III, when early morning period 
 also was suspended, 86 seconds. 
 
 The values obtained from No. 35 were, for Period I, 1 38 seconds, for Period II, 
 1 13 seconds, arid for Period III, 1 02 seconds. 
 
 Thus, in every instance the suspension of overtime was followed by a diminution 
 in the period necessary to perform a definite series of physiological processes, and, 
 therefore, by an improvement in the condition of the subject under examination. In 
 some instances the diminution was relatively large. In every case also the suspension 
 of the early morning period was followed by a further diminution of the reaction 
 time, and a further improvement in the condition of the subject. 
 
 The results obtained in the above experiment have been corroborated by another 
 set of tests, the requirement in this case being the recognition and selection of a 
 definite colour. Periods I, II, and III correspond to those of the former series, 
 Period I referring to two weeks during which overtime was worked, Period II to two 
 weeks during which it was suspended, and Period III to a further period during 
 which both overtime and early morning period were suspended. 
 
 The first worker, No. 35A, showed a reaction time of 0'87 seconds during Period I, 
 75 seconds during Period II, and 075 seconds during Period III. Again a con- 
 
 CJ^.-.1_1_ _1 * * j_*_ (* i 1 , . i -, c * 
 
 overtime, 
 seconds 
 
 values are for Period I, 89 seconds, for Period II, 0'85 seconds, ancffor Period' III 
 85 seconds. 
 
 In all of these cases the suspension of overtime was followed by a diminution of 
 the reaction time, indicating an improvement in the general condition of the 
 worker. In one instance the cessation of the early morning period produced a 
 further improvement. 
 
 In order to test the matter further, a similar investigation was carried out in 
 another Department, where the workers were engaged in a different class of work 
 identical with those already described were carried on for a period of about 
 six weeks, the periods corresponding to those described previously. The workers 
 selected were seven women employed in the winding room, their numbers being 8, 10 
 12, 11, 14, Id, and 14A. 
 
62 
 
 The table of collected averages shows that No. 8 gave a value of 1 42 seconds for 
 Period I. 1'13 seconds for Period II, and 1 04 seconds for Period III. 
 
 Worker No. 10 gave values of 1'04 seconds for Period I, 092 for Period II, 
 5)6 for Period III. 
 
 No. 12 worker gave 1'14 seconds for Period I, 0'% seconds for Period II, and 
 !>4 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 11 worker gave 1 06 seconds for Period I, I'Ol seconds for Period 11. 
 
 99 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 14 worker gave 1 22 seconds for Period I, 1'07 seconds for Period II, 
 102 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No., 13 worker gave 1'36 seconds for Period I, 1'20 seconds for Period II, 
 
 1 19 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 14.4. worker gave T52 seconds for Period I, 1 25 seconds for Period II, 
 1 18 seconds for Period III. 
 
 In every instance the suspension of overtime has been followed by a shortening 
 of the reaction time, and by a corresponding improvement in the general condition 
 of the worker. In six cases out of seven the subsequent suspension of the early 
 morning period was followed by a further shortening of the reaction time. 
 
 Finally, the results are given of a further series of tests carried out on the same 
 set of workers, the recognition and selection of a definite colour being employed. The 
 summarised table on p. 63 shows that No. 8 gave a value of 1'16 seconds for Period I 
 when overtime was worked, 1 03 seconds for Period II, and 095 seconds for 
 Period III. 
 
 No. 10 worker gave 92 seconds for Period I, 0'79 seconds for Period II, and 
 076 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 12 gave 99 seconds for Period I, 0'83 seconds for Period II, and 0'86 
 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 11 gave 0'84 seconds for Period I, 078 seconds for Period II. and 074 
 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 14 gave 0'95 seconds for Period I, 0'86 seconds for Period II, 0'85 seconds for 
 Period III. 
 
 Worker No. 13 gave 114 seconds for Period I, 1'08 seconds for Period II, and 
 1'03 seconds for Period III. 
 
 No. 14A gave 1 38 seconds for Period I, 1'08 seconds for Period II, and 0'86 
 seconds for Period III. 
 
 In this series of tests also in every case the suspension of overtime has been 
 followed by a shortening in some cases a considerable shortening of the reaction 
 time, indicating a corresponding improvement in the general condition of the worker. 
 In six instances out of seven the suspension of early morning work was followed by 
 a further shortening of the reaction time. 
 
 TABLES OF VALUES. 
 
 TABLE I. 
 
 Showing the Influence of Overtime on the General Health of the Worker. 
 Lint Packers. 
 
 Complex Reaction Time.- Letters. 
 
 Averages of Morning and Evening Values for the three Periods- 
 Period I. Overtime and Early Morning Periods worked. 
 Period II. Overtime suspended. 
 Period III. Overtime and Early Morning Periods suspended. 
 
 
 
 
 T 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period I. 
 
 1-17 
 
 1-05 
 
 1-38 
 
 ' Period II 
 
 0-81) 0-87 
 
 1-13 
 
 
 
 Period III 
 
 0-88 
 
 0-86 
 
 1-02 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE II. 
 
 Showing the Influence of Overtime on the General Health of the Worker. 
 Lint Packers. 
 
 Complex Reaction Time. Colours. 
 
 Averages of Morning and Evening Values for the three Periods 
 ' Period I. Overtime and Early Morning Period worked. 
 Period II. Overtime suspended. 
 Period III. Overtime and Early Morning Periods suspended. 
 
 
 
 No 35A 
 
 No 33 
 
 No. 3"i. 
 
 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 Period I 
 
 0-87 
 
 0-88 
 
 0-89 
 
 
 Period II 
 
 0-7f> 
 
 0-74 
 
 0-85 
 
 
 Period III. ... 
 
 0-75 
 
 0-73 
 
 0-85 
 
 TABLE III. 
 
 Showing the Influence of Overtime on the General Health of the Worker. 
 Winders. 
 
 Complex Reaction Time. Letters. 
 
 Averages of Morning and Evening Values for the three Periods- 
 Period I. Overtime and Early Morning Period worked. 
 Period II. Overtime suspended. 
 Period III. Overtime and Early Morning Periods suspended. 
 
 
 No 8 
 
 No 10 
 
 No I 9 
 
 No 11 
 
 No 14 
 
 No 13 
 
 No 14A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period I. 
 
 1-42 
 
 1-04 
 
 1-14 
 
 1-06 
 
 1-22 
 
 1-3IJ 
 
 1-52 
 
 Period II 
 
 1-13 
 
 0-92 
 
 0-96 
 
 1-01 
 
 1-07 
 
 1-20 
 
 1-25 
 
 Period III 
 
 1-04 
 
 o-% 
 
 0-94 
 
 0-99 
 
 1-02 
 
 1-19 
 
 1-18 
 
 TABLE IV. 
 
 Showing the Influence of Overtime upon the General Health of the Worker. 
 Winders. 
 
 Complex Reaction Time. Colours. 
 
 Averages for the Periods I, II, III : 
 
 Period I. Overtime and Early Morning Period worked. 
 
 Period II. Overtime suspended. 
 
 Period III. Overtime and Early Morning Periods suspended. 
 
 
 No 8 
 
 Nn 10 
 
 No 12 
 
 No 11 
 
 No 14 
 
 No 13 
 
 No 14A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Period I. 
 Period 11 
 Period III 
 
 1-16 
 1-03 
 0-95 
 
 0-92 
 0-79 
 0-76 
 
 0-99 
 0-83 
 0-86 
 
 0-84 
 0-78 
 0-74 
 
 0-95 
 0-86 
 0-85 
 
 1-14 
 1-08 
 1-03 
 
 1-38 
 1-08 
 0-86 
 
 It is possible to test the influence of overtime in another manner. It has already 
 been shown that factory workers often lose a considerable amount of time in their 
 daily work. It is probably incorrect to call such lost time wasted, since the cessation 
 from labour seems to be brought about as a result of a distinct need of the organism 
 for rest. The time therefore is not wilfully wasted, but is employed as a breathing 
 space, and for recovery from fatigue. 
 
 Since the loss depends upon fatigue, or upon a condition produced in the worker 
 as a result of fatigue, it is likely that its amount will be greater when fatigue is 
 increased, and there is evidence to show that time lost and exhaustion of energy run 
 pari passu. It is easy to estimate the amount of time lost, and to draw conclusions 
 from this as to the general condition of the worker, and provided the data used % are 
 sufficiently extensive, the result will be useful. 
 
64 
 
 An enquiry on these lines was carried out upon a group of eight workers, and 
 extended over a period of about six weeks. The time was divided into three experi- 
 mental periods, during which the conditions of labour were varied. In the first 
 period work commenced at 6 a.m. and continued till 8 p.m. with a total of two hours 
 off for meals. In the second period the day still commenced at 6 a.m., but ended at 
 5.30 p.m. In the third period the day commenced at 8.30 a.m. and ended at 5.30 p.m. 
 During the Period 1, therefore, work should have been carried on for a total of 
 twelve hours in the day. Reference to the figures of Table V. on p. 64 shows that on 
 no single day of the period was the full twelve hours worked. The nearest approach 
 to it was on Tuesday, 25th January, when 11 hours and 23 minutes were worked. 
 On Thursday, 27th January, only 8 hours and 14 minutes were worked. Thus, on 
 Tuesday an average of 37 minutes was lost on the day's work by each member of the 
 group examined, whilst on Thursday the average was 3 hours 46 minutes as an 
 average, or, multiplied by the number in the group, a total of 30 hours and 8 minutes. 
 Since, however, a transient indisposition may sometimes lead to a loss of time, a 
 more just estimate can be obtained from the average for the whole periods of the 
 test. The average total time worked in the ten days comprised within Period 1 is 
 99 hours and 1 minute, which gives a loss 20 hours 59 minutes, or an average loss of 
 2 hours and 6 minutes per worker per day. In Period 2 when overtime was 
 suspended, and the working day contained ten hours instead of twelve, the time 
 worked was greater in proportion, and the time lost less. The average total time 
 worked was 87 hours, showing a loss of 13 hours, or 1 hour 18 minutes per day. In 
 Period 3 the time worked was a total of 33 hours and 35 minutes, showing a loss of 
 6 hours and 25 minutes or 1 hour and 17 minutes per day. 
 
 The time lost during the first period, 2 hours and 6 minutes, is 17 5 per cent, of 
 the total time of the day. During Period 2, the time lost was 1 hour and 18 minutes, 
 and this is 13 per cent, of the daily period of labour. Thus, a diminution in the length 
 of the working day has diminished the loss of time to a disproportionate extent, 
 and, just as it has been shown that a lengthening of the working day leads to an 
 increase of fatigue which is disproportionate to the added hours, so here it is found 
 that a long day leads to much loss of time, which is greatly reduced when the day is 
 shortened. 
 
 Unfortunately, it is impossible to draw any useful conclusion from an examina- 
 tion of the figures for Period 3, since, whilst the experiment was in progress, trouble 
 arose in another department of the mill and, as a result, the workers were disturbed 
 and their occupation disorganised. Hence, a great deal of extra time was wasted. 
 
 TABLE V. 
 
 Average Time worked per day during Experimental Periods I, II, and III for 
 a group of eight workers : 
 
 Period !. Overtime and Early Morning Period worked. 
 
 Period II. Overtime suspended. 
 
 Period III. Overtime and Early Morning Period suspended. 
 
 PERIOD 1. 
 
 Tuesday, 25th January 
 Wednesday, 26th 
 Thursday, 27th 
 Friday, 28th 
 Monday, 31st 
 
 
 PERIOD 2. 
 
 
 Hrs. Mins. 
 11 23 
 10 42 
 
 8 14 
 11 7 
 10 7 
 
 Tuesday, 8th Febi 
 Wednesday, 9th , 
 Thursday,* 10th 
 Friday, llth 
 Monday, 14th 
 
 nary 
 
 
 Hrs. Mins. 
 8 ,27 
 8 46 
 9 5 
 9 9 
 8 48 
 
 Tuesday, 1st February 
 Wednesday, 2nd 
 Thursday, 3rd 
 Friday, 4th 
 Monday, 7th 
 
 Total ... 
 
 
 9 15 
 10 24 
 8 34 
 10 34 
 8 41 
 
 99 1 
 9 54 
 
 Tuesday, 15th 
 Wednesday, 16th 
 Thursday, 17th 
 Friday, 18th 
 Monday, 21st 
 
 Total 
 
 
 
 8 50 
 8 58 
 8 48 
 8 8 
 8 1 
 
 87 
 8 42 
 
 Average (per day) 
 
 Average (per day) 
 
6.5 
 
 
 PERIOD 3. 
 
 
 
 
 Wednesday, 23rd February 
 Thursday, 24th 
 Friday, 2")th 
 Monday, 28th 
 Tuesday, 29th 
 
 Hrs. Mins. 
 6 49 
 7 12 
 6 59 
 5 53 
 C> 42 
 
 
 TABLE VI. 
 
 Average times per day for eight workers are given for each of the three 
 Experimental Periods. 
 
 
 Period. 
 
 Average 
 Time. 
 
 Percentage 
 of Time 
 Lost. 
 
 
 
 Period 1 
 
 Hrs. Mins. 
 9 54 
 
 7 
 
 /o 
 
 17-5 
 
 
 
 Period 2 
 
 8 42 
 
 13-0 
 
 
 
 Period 3 
 
 6 43 
 
 16-0* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * This figure is not to be taken as trustworthy, since the work of the whole room was 
 disorganised through trouble arising in another part of the mill. 
 
 Again, three winders gave the following results: 
 
 When working 12 hours per day, the time lost was 19 5 per cent. 
 
 10 150 
 
 8 ,, ,, 13 3 
 
 Summary of Section HI. (iv.). 
 
 The general health of the worker, upon which his rate of working and his powers 
 of endurance depend, so far as it can be gauged by the tests used in this investiga- 
 tion, appears to be prejudiced by the introduction of overtime, and, to a less extent, 
 by work in the early morning hours. The suspension of overtime was followed in 
 every case by an improvement in the condition of the worker. In a large propor- 
 tion of cases that condition was further improved by the suspension of work in the 
 early morning hours. 
 
 Where an estimate was made of the time lost by the worker, and this was taken 
 as an indication of his general health, the suspension of overtime was found to 
 result in a saving of time of four and a half per cent. The subsequent suspension 
 of the early morning period was followed by a further diminution in the time lost. 
 
 7312 
 
66 
 
 APPENDIX A. 
 
 DETAILS OF THE INDIVIDUALS EXAMINED. 
 
 SURGICAL DRESSING DRIERS. WOMEN. 
 Hours 6 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Overtime 6 p.m. -8 p.m. 
 Factory E. 
 
 1. Age 23 years. Surgical dressing drier. Single. Abstainer. Lives a quarter 
 
 of a mile from work, and walks to and fro. Stated to have had scarlet 
 fever four years ago, was away from work three months. Takes no food 
 before coming to work in the morning., Goes home to all meals. Sleeps 
 well. Fond of walking. Has worked in the mill for seven years. 
 
 2. Age 23 years. Surgical dressing drier. Single. Very rarely takes alcohol. 
 
 Lives two miles from work, walks to the mill, and usually back also. 
 Takes tea, bread and butter, and cake before work. Sleeps well. Has 
 worked at the mill for about a year. 
 
 3. Age 20 years. Cloth drier. Single. Takes very little alcohol. Lives one 
 
 mile from work, and walks to and fro. Takes no food before work. Sleeps 
 well. Has worked at mill for three months. 
 
 4. Age 17 years. Surgical dressing drier. Single. Abstainer. Lives half a 
 
 mile from work, and walks to and fro. States that she had quinsy two 
 years ago, and was absent from work two weeks. Takes tea and bread 
 and butter before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has 
 worked one year in the mill. Engaged previously in laundry, but found 
 the work too hard. 
 
 5. Age 27 years. Surgical dressing drier. Single. Abstainer. Lives one mile 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Takes tea and bread and butter before 
 coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has worked eleven years 
 at the mill, three years in spinning room and eight years in the drying 
 room. Changed work for sake of higher wages. 
 
 6. Age 25 years. Surgical dressing drier. Married three years. No family. 
 
 Moderate drinker. Lives half a mile from work, and walks to and fro. 
 Has enjoyed good health. Takes tea, bread and butter before coming to 
 work in the morning. . Sleeps well. Worked at wool-picking five years 
 (13-18), domestic service about six years, and present work one year. 
 
 FOREMAN. 
 
 7. Age 42 years. Foreman, surgical dressing drying room. Married. Has seven 
 
 children. Moderate drinker. Moderate smoker. Lives three-quarters of 
 a mile from work, and walks or cycles to and fro. Has enjoyed very good 
 health. Takes tea and bread and butter before coming to' work in the 
 morning. Played football and cricket for many years, gave up the former 
 three years ago, still plays latter. Has been nearly thirty years at the 
 mill, having worked in the mechanic's shop, packing room, spinning room, 
 and says present duties suit him best. 
 
 WINDERS. WOMEN. 
 Hours 6 a.m. -5. 30 p.m. Overtime 6 p.m. -8 p.m. 
 
 8. Age 16 years. Winder. Single. Abstainer. Lives three-quarters of a mile 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Takes tea and bread and butter before 
 coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has worked four years at 
 the mill, first two years employed in " reaching," latter two years as a 
 winder. 
 
 (iets very tired about 7 p.m., due to much overtime. 
 
9. Age 27 years. Winder. Single. Abstainer. Lives two and a half miles 
 from work, and rides to and fro. Takes cup of tea only before coming to 
 work in the morning. All meals at mill; breakfast, cocoa, bread and 
 butter. Dinner, tea and bread and butter. Tea, tea, cakes and scones. 
 On arrival at home, about 8.45 p.m., takes fish and chips nearly every 
 night. Always hot dinner Sunday mid-day. Sleeps well. Has' worked 
 three years at the mill. Previously nine months at a jam factory, her work 
 being fruit picking. Present work does not suit her, as the hours are too 
 long. 
 
 10. Age 21 years. Winder. Single. Abstainer. Lives three-quarters of a mile 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. States that she suffered from influenza 
 three months ago, a slight attack. Takes tea, bread and butter before 
 coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has worked four years 
 at the mill. Previously worked at coil winding with an electrical company. 
 Finds present work very tiring, especially towards evening. 
 
 11. Age 17 years. Winder. Single. Almost total abstainer. Lives one and 
 
 a half miles from work, and walks to and fro. Takes tea, bread and 
 butter before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has worked 
 two years at the mill, one year in " setting in." Prefers the winding. 
 Worked nine months at a mill at Matlock as wool cleaner (machine). Finds 
 the work rather tiring. 
 
 12. Age 23 years. Winder. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives three- 
 
 quarters of a mile from work, and walks to and fro. Sleeps well. States 
 that she had a " nervous breakdown ' two and a half years ago. Doctor 
 said she required no medicine, but a good rest. Recovered after one 
 week. Usual hours, 6 a.m. -5. 3d p.m. Present hours, 6 a.m. -8 p.m. 
 Takes tea, bread and butter before coming to work in the morning. 
 Walks a great deal " in order to get the fresh air/' which she states she 
 " finds very necessary." Has worked at mill about ten months as bobbin 
 collector, and about seven years as winder. Previously employed for two 
 years at dressmaking. 
 
 Up to two and a half years ago lived three miles away from work, 
 and travelled by car. Found this too tiring, and came to live nearer to 
 the mill. Since doing this, she states that owing to getting good food 
 properly served at home she is able to work much better, and earns more 
 money. 
 
 Finds the work very tiring, especially the overtime. Even when 
 working till 5.30 p.m. the effects of the long standing is felt. 
 
 Stated to be a very efficient winder. 
 
 13. Age 21 years. Winder. Single. Abstainer. Lives quarter of a mile from 
 
 work, and walks to and fro. Sleeps well. Suffered from rheumatism two 
 years ago, ill six weeks. Usual hours, 6 a,m. to 8 p.m. Saturday, noon. 
 Takes tea, bread and butter before coming to work in the morning. Feels 
 very tired in the evening. Has worked six years at the mill, in various 
 departments. 
 
 14. Age 19 years. Winder. Single. Abstainer. Lives three-quarters of a mile 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Sleeps well. Health good. Usual 
 hours. 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday, noon. Finds work very trying, and 
 hours too long. Fatigue commences to be felt about 3 p.m. 
 
 Takes tea, bread and butter before coming to work in the morning. 
 Feels very tired in the evening. Has worked five years at the mill, in 
 various departments. 
 
 14A. Age 32 years. Winder. Single. Takes glass of stout for dinner and supper. 
 Lives five minutes walk from mill, and walks to and fro. Sleeps well. 
 Good health except for few colds and occasional dyspepsia. Nominal 
 hours 6 a.m. to 8 p.m., but rarely works early morning period or overtime. 
 Present work not disagreeable. 
 
 Always takes a cup of tea before work, occasionally also slice of bread 
 and butter. Home to meals, hot meat and vegetables every day in cold 
 
 7312 I > 
 
68 
 
 Weather, otherwise cold meat and potatoes. No fish or chips. Appears to 
 live well. 
 
 Hippodrome or cinema four times a week, but always first house. Has 
 worked as winder at the mill for about seventeen years. 
 
 14s. Age 27 years. Winder. Married, no family. Abstainer. Non-smoker. 
 Lives five minutes walk from mill and walks to and fro. Sleeps very well. 
 Very good health. Finds work trying when working 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. 
 Makes best use of any intervals. 
 
 Takes tea, bread and butter or cake before work. Home to meals, 
 hot meat and vegetables for dinner daily except Friday. Takes no supper. 
 Goes twice a week to hippodrome or cinema, early house. Has been a 
 winder six or seven years. 
 
 SPINNERS. WOMEN. 
 Hours 6 a.m. -5. 30 p.m. Overtime 6 p.m. -8 p.m. 
 
 15. Age 19 years. Spinner. Single. Abstainer. Lives three-quarters of a mile 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Takes tea, bread and dripping before 
 work. Sleeps well. Has worked at mill five years. 
 
 16. Age 16 years. Doffer in spinning room. Single. Abstainer. Does not smoke. 
 
 Lives quarter of a mile from work, and walks to and fro. Takes no food 
 before coming to work in the morning. Fried fish for dinner and some- 
 times for supper. Sleeps well. Has worked one year and nine months 
 at the mill. Previously can filling. 
 
 17. Age 17 years. Spinner. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives three 
 
 minutes from work. Has always enjoyed good health. Takes cocoa and 
 bread and butter before coming to work in the morning. Home to all meals. 
 Sleeps well. Has worked for three years at the mill. 
 
 18. Age 19 years. Spinner. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives about 
 
 two miles from work, and comes in by car. Takes tea, bread and butter 
 before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has worked at mill 
 about nine months. Was in domestic service till she came to the mill, 
 
 19. Age 29 years. Spinner. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives about two 
 
 miles from work, and walks to and fro. States that she suffered a nervous 
 breakdown, and was ill about three months. Returned to work three 
 weeks ago. Does not consider that the illness was due to her present work. 
 Takes no food before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Spends 
 all spare time with the Salvation Army. Has worked fifteen years at 
 the mill. 
 
 20. Age 17 years. Spinner. Single. Abstainer. Lives about three miles from 
 
 work, walks part of the distance and rides the rest. Has enjoyed good 
 health. Takes tea, bread and butter before coming to work in the morning. 
 Sleeps well. Has worked one year at the mill. Previously was engaged 
 in waterproof making. 
 
 LINT MAKERS. MEN. 
 
 DAY AND NIGHT SHIFTS IN ALTERNATE WEEKS. 
 Hours 6 a.m. -6 p.m., or 6 p.m. -6 a.m. 
 
 21. Age 43 years. Surgical lint maker. Married. Four children. Moderate 
 
 drinker. Moderate smoker. Lives one mile from work, and walks to and 
 fro. Stated to have had pneumonia three years ago. Works on day and 
 night shift during alternate weeks. Takes tea and bread and butter 
 before coming to work in the morning. Has three good meals a day. No 
 supper. Sleeps well at night, but badly by day. Has worked nearly two 
 years at the mill. Formerly labourer in the iron trade. Present work 
 suits him much better. 
 
69 
 
 22. Age 26 years. Surgical lint maker. Single. Abstainer. Moderate smoker. 
 
 Lives about a mile from work. Usually cycles or walks. Takes tea only 
 before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well at night, but badly 
 by day. Right-eye defective. States that he works better by day than by 
 night. Walks a great deal- Has worked twelve years at the mill. 
 
 23. Age 57 years. Surgical lint maker. Widower, twice married. Twenty-eight 
 
 years of married life. Four children, all grown up. Moderate drinker. 
 Moderate smoker. Lives one mile from work. Walks in morning, rides 
 (car) home at night. Takes cup of tea only before coming to work in 
 morning. When on night shift food sent to mill to be heated when wanted. 
 Sleeps well at night, but badly by day- Has worked thirty years at the 
 mill, fourteen of which were spent in the mechanics' shop- 
 
 24. Age 29 years. Surgical lint maker. Married nine years. Has two children. 
 
 Moderate drinker. Moderate smoker. Lives quarter of a mile from work, 
 and walks to and fro. Works on day and night shifts during alternate 
 weeks. Takes tea and bread and butter before coming to work in the 
 morning. Sleeps well at night, but badly by day. Has worked three 
 months at the mill. Formerly lamplighter ten years, then two years in 
 a brewery. 
 
 25. Age 45 years. Surgical lint maker. Married. Has five children. Lives half- 
 
 a-mile from work, and walks to and fro. Moderate drinker. Moderate 
 smoker. Works on day and night shift during alternate weeks. Takes 
 hot breakfast before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps well at night, 
 but badly by day. Has worked one year at the mill. Previously was 
 ranching in British Columbia and came home on account of the war. 
 
 * 
 
 BLEACHER. MAN. 
 Hours 6 a-m. -5. 30 p.m. 
 
 26. Age 17 years. Works in cloth bleaching room. Packs lint cloth, &c., into 
 
 boilers. Also carries dried surgical cloth from one department to another. 
 Single. Abstainer. Smokes an occasional cigarette. Lives half a mile 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Suffers from epilepsy, and states that 
 he has a fit about every five weeks. If his head is not very bad he returns 
 to work soon after the attack. Was obliged to leave school through this. 
 Was in hospital ten weeks with hip disease, and discharged as incurable. 
 This does not affect him in his work- Does not work any overtime. Takes 
 tea and bread and butter before coming to work in the morning. Sleeps 
 well. Has worked eleven weeks at the mill. Was previously a telegraph 
 messenger. 
 
 WEAVERS. WOMEN. 
 Hours 6 a.m. -5. 30 p.m. Overtime 6 p.m. -8 p.m. 
 
 27. Age 16 years- Weaver. Single. Almost total abstainer. Lives quarter of 
 
 a mile from work, and walks to and fro. Takes a hot meal before coming 
 to work in the morning. Sleeps well. Has worked two years at the mill, 
 in the weaving room. Previously at another mill as surgical dressing 
 compressor. 
 
 28. Age 17 years. Weaver. Single. Abstainer. Lives one and a half miles 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Takes tea, bread and butter before 
 coming to work in the morning. Takes all meals at the mill. Dinner 
 consists of tea and chips only and bread- Hot meat and vegetables on 
 arrival at home. Sleeps well. Has worked four years at the mill. 
 
 29. Age 17 years. Weaver. Single. Abstainer. Lives one and a half miles 
 
 from work, and walks to and fro. Suffers from severe headaches, attri- 
 buted to the noise at the mill. Takes tea, bread and butter before coming 
 to work in the morning. All meals at the mill. Warms meat and vege- 
 tables for dinner. Supper on arrival at home. Has worked three years 
 at the mill. Was for a year and a half in domestic service. 
 
70 
 
 30. Age 19 years. Weaver. Single. Abstainer. Lives about 80 yards from 
 
 work, and walks to and fro. Takes cocoa, bread and butter before coming 
 to work in the morning. Home to breakfast and dinner. Cold dinners, 
 few vegetables. Hot dinner occasionally on Sundays. Sleeps well. Has 
 worked six years at the mill. 
 
 SLASHERS OR TAPERS. MEN. 
 Hours as noted. 
 
 31. Age 53 years. Taper. Married, has five children, all grown up. Very 
 
 moderate drinker. Moderate smoker. Lives two minutes walk from work. 
 Stated to have had small-pox thirty years ago. Also fractured clavicle 
 and leg. Takes tea and bread and butter before coming to work in the 
 morning. Sleeps well. In spare time acts as doorkeeper at skating rink. 
 Has worked at the mill forty-five years, having been in nearly all depart- 
 ments. Began as half-time hand at eight years of age. Commenced full 
 time at thirteen years. Hours 6 a.m. -5. 30 p.m. 
 
 32. Age 21 years. Slasher and sizer. Single. Abstainer. . Moderate smoker. 
 
 Lives quarter of a mile from work, and walks to and fro. Health excellent. 
 Takes tea, bread and butter, and cake before coming to work in the morn- 
 ing. Goes home to all meals. Sleeps well. Has worked six years at the 
 mill, in different departments (bagging wool, clearing wool from floors, and 
 weighing }'arn). Previously employed as a billiard marker and in making 
 peg-tops. Hours 6 a.m.-lO* p.m. 
 
 LINT ROLLERS OR PACKERS. WOMEN. 
 Hours 6 a.m.-5.30 p.m. Overtime 6 p.m. -8 p.m. 
 
 33. Age 20 years. Lint roller. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives five 
 
 minutes walk from work. Sleeps well. No previous illness. Hours, 
 6 a-m. to 8 p.m. Takes an apple only before coming to work in the morning. 
 Seldom takes supper. Has worked three years at the mill. Previously 
 assisted with housework at home. Very cheerful disposition. 
 
 34. Age 19 years. Lint roller. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives five 
 
 minutes walk from work. No previous illness while here. Hours, 6 a.m. 
 to 8 p.m. Takes no food before coming to work in the morning. Dinner 
 often of fish and chips. Takes no supper. Worked at mill two months, 
 left in December, 1915. Previously at another mill, which she left to enter 
 domestic service. Afterwards came to this mill. 
 
 35. Age 23 years. Lint roller. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives five 
 
 minutes walk from work., Sleeps well. Stated to have had quinsy at 
 Christmas ( ? 1914), but only ill one day. Hours, 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. Takes 
 tea, bread and dripping before coming to work in morning. Has worked 
 seven years at the mill. Previously in domestic service for three months. 
 
 35A. Age 18 years. Lint roller. Single. Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives three 
 to -four miles from work and walks to and fro. Hours, 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. 
 Takes tea, bread and butter and cake before coming to work in the morning. 
 Dinner at mill. Hot meat and vegetables at night. Sleeps well. 
 
 i>oRAcic LINT AND SURGICAL DRESSING ROLLERS OR PACKERS. WOMEN. 
 
 Hours 6 a.m. -5.30 p.m. 
 
 36. Age 23 years. Boracic lint and surgical dressing roller. Single. Abstainer. 
 
 Non-smoker. Lives five minutes walk from work. Sleeps well. Has had 
 no previous illnesses. Enjoys good health. Hours, 6 a,m. to 5.30 p.m. 
 " Sometimes " takes tea, bread and butter before coming to work in the 
 morning. Otherwise nothing. Assists in domestic work at home. Has 
 worked at the mill ten. years. Previously at another mill for ten months 
 as a packer. 
 
71 
 
 37. Age 20 years. Lint and surgical (antiseptic) dressing roller. Abstainer. 
 
 Non-smoker. Lives one and a half miles from work, and walks to and 
 fro. Sleeps well. Has always enjoyed good health. Hours, 6 a.m.. to 
 5.30 p.m. Takes tea, bread and butter before coming to work in the 
 morning. Seldom takes supper. Has worked five years at the mill. 
 
 38. Age 24 years, Lint and surgical (antiseptic) dressing roller. Married. No 
 
 family. Non-smoker. Lives quarter of a mile from work, and walks to 
 juid fro. (iocs home to all meals. Takes tea, bacon, &c., before going to 
 work in the morning. Meat and potatoes for dinner. Takes no supper. 
 Does house-work at home. Suffers from indigestion. Has had rheumatism 
 and nasal catarrh since working in antiseptic department. Has worked 
 at the mill five or six years. Left on 12th January, 1916. Previously 
 in domestic service, 
 
 39. Lint and surgical (antiseptic) dressing roller. Single. Abstainer. Non- 
 
 smoker. Lives one mile from work, and walks to and fro. Sleeps well, 
 enjoys good health. Hours, 6 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Takes tea, bread and 
 butter, and bacon before coming to work in the morning. Takes breakfast 
 at the mill. Tea and bread and butter and pastry. Goes home in middle 
 of the day, and has a hot dinner (meat, &c.) daily. Does not often take 
 supper. Has worked at the mill ten years. 
 
 40 Age 17 years. Lint and surgical (antiseptic) dressing roller. Single. 
 
 Abstainer. Non-smoker. Lives five minutes walk from work. Sleeps 
 well. Robust health. Hours, 6 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Takes tea, bread and 
 butter before coming to work in the morning. Goes home to meals. 
 Hot meat and vegetables for dinner. Takes tripe, fish and chips, &c., for 
 supper. Leisure spent chiefly at " Settlement." Has worked two years 
 at the mill. Previously engaged in rope and twine making (five months). 
 
 40A. Age 22 years. Lint and surgical (antiseptic) dressing roller. Single. 
 Abstainer. Lives a mile and a half from work and walks to and fro. 
 Sleeps well. Hours, 6 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Takes cup of tea and sometimes 
 bread and butter before work. Breakfast at mill, tea and bread and 
 butter, cold bacon occasionally. Dinner, about three times a week hurries 
 home for hot dinner. On other days has tea, bread and cold meat or pastry. 
 For tea, takes tea, bread and butter, cake or jam. For supper, bread and 
 cheese, with nothing to drink. Goes about once a week to place of amuse- 
 ment. Has worked at present employment about a year and four months. 
 
 OFFICE STAFF. MEN. 
 Hours 8.30 a.m. -5. 30 p.m. Overtime often worked. 
 
 41 Age 35 years. Wages clerk. Married, and has two children. Abstainer. 
 
 Moderate smoker. Lives a mile from the mill, and walks to and fro. 
 Sleeps well. Good health, except occasional cold. Usual hours, 8.30 a.m.- 
 5.30 p.m. Works overtime till 10 p.m. on Thursdays and Fridays, and 
 occasionally on another night in the week also. On Saturday works till 
 noon. Goes home to all meals. Has been fourteen and a half years at the 
 mill, and three years at the London office of the firm. Previously employed 
 at a chemical works. Tall, dark. Does not look well. 
 
 42. Age 31. Accountants clerk. Married, has three children. Takes very little 
 
 alcohol. Moderate smoker. Lives three-quarters of a mile from work, 
 and walks to and fro. Sleeps well. Had an operation two years ago 
 for abdominal abscess, and was laid up ten weeks. Considers himself quite 
 cured. Usual hours, 8.30 a.m. till 5.30 p.m. Has occasionally worked till 
 9 p.m. twice weekly. Goes home to all meals. Has been employed at mill 
 nineteen years. 
 
 43. Age 23 years. Wages clerk. Married, no children. Takes little alcohol. 
 
 Moderate smoker. Lives quarter of a n^ile from work, and walks to 
 and fro. Sleeps well as a rule, but lately disturbed owing to illness in 
 his house. Usual hours, 8.30 a.m. till 5.30 p.m., Saturdays, noon. About 
 twice a week remains till 8 p.m. Takes all meals at home. Has been 
 
72 
 
 employed for ten years at the mill, nine years in the general office. Worked 
 in canning mill nine months ; weigh office three months. At night, packing 
 in warehouse, usually 6 p.m. till 9 or 10 p.m. Commenced this work at 
 beginning of October, 1915. Serious illness in house for some months past. 
 
 44. Age 36 years. Wages and sales clerk. Married, one child. Moderate 
 
 drinker. Moderate smoker. Lives a mile from work, and walks to and 
 fro. Sleeps well. Suffers from frequent colds. At first found work too 
 hard but extra assistance was given, and duties now suit him well. Goes 
 home to all meals. Has been employed at the mill for twenty years. 
 Previously was clerk at a chemical works for nine months, and afterwards 
 in a solicitor's office, 
 
 45. Age 26 years. Invoice clerk (export). Married, has two children. Takes 
 
 very little alcohol. Moderate smoker. Lives quarter of a mile from 
 work, and walks to and fro. Suffers from occasional colds, and for 
 past two weeks from frequent headaches, possibly due to close work by 
 artificial light. These headaches commence towards the end of the day. 
 Goes home to all meals. Fond of amusements, but not cinemas (eyesight 
 probably defective ; see above, headaches). Has been employed thirteen 
 years at the mill, started as office boy. Usual hours, 8.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. 
 Seldom gets away to time usually 8 or 9 p.m. On Saturday gets away at 
 1 2.30 or 1 p.m. 
 
 APPENDIX B. 
 
 DATA OF TIME ACTUALLY WORKED IN DIFFERENT PERIODS OF THE DAY. 
 
 WINDERS. 
 
 Total time worked out of a possible ten hours : - 
 
 No. 13. 8 hours 34 minutes. 
 No. 11. 7 hours 34 minutes. 
 
 Percentage of time lost during different periods of the day : 
 
 Early morning (6 ; 0-8.0 a.m.}. 
 
 No. 13. 28 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 28 minutes were wasted.) 
 No. 11. 25 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 25 were wasted.) 
 
 Morning (8.30 a.m. -12. 30 p.m.}. 
 
 No. 13. 11 percent. (Out of 100 working minutes 11 were wasted.) 
 No. 11. 18 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 18 were wasted.) 
 
 Afternoon (1.30-5.30 p.m.). 
 
 No. 13. 10 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 10 were wasted.) 
 . 11. _ 27 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 27 were wasted.) 
 
 On another occasion the following results were obtainable : 
 
 Total time worked out of a possible ten hours :- 
 No. 13. 8 hours 40 minutes. 
 No.. 11. 7 hours 26 minutes. 
 
 Total time worked out of a possible eight hours :- 
 No. 12. 7 hours 23 minutes. 
 No. 14B. 7 hours 24 minutes. 
 
Percentage of time lost during different periods of the day : 
 
 Early morning (6 a.m. -8 a.m.). 
 
 No. 13. 13 3 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 133 minutes were lost.) 
 No. 11, 33'3 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 33'3 minutes were lost.) 
 
 'Morning (8.30 a.m.-12.30 p.m.}. 
 
 No. 13. 6'1 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 6'1 minutes were lost.) 
 No. 11. 8'75 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 8'75 minutes were lost.) 
 No.. 12. 3'75 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 3'75 minutes were lost.) 
 No. 14s. 8'3 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 8'3 minutes were lost.) 
 
 Afternoon (1.30 p.m.-5.3Q p.m.). 
 
 No. 13. 22 2 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 22'2 minutes were lost.) 
 
 No. ll.i 38'7 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 387 minutes were lost.) 
 
 No. 12. 11 '7 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 11 '7 minutes were lost.) 
 
 No. 14B. 6'6 per cent. (Out of 100 working minutes 6'6 minutes were lost.) 
 
 Two of the above winders were working eight hours a day, whilst the remaining 
 two were working ten hours a day. The percentage of time lost in the Early Morn- 
 ing Period by those working the long day was high. In the Morning Period it 
 dropped considerably. In the Afternoon Period there is a striking difference 
 between the time lost by those who commenced in the early morning and those who 
 commenced at 8.30 a.m., the former showing losses of 22'2 and 38'7 per cent., the 
 latter 11'7 and 6'6 per cent. The long day has resulted in a large amount of time 
 being lost. 
 
 7312 
 
74 
 INDEX. 
 
 PAGES. 
 
 Adjustment, by variation of application ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 49 
 
 of vital functions ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ... ... 17 
 
 Application of worker a means of adjustment ... 48,49 
 
 variation of ... 49 
 
 output an indication of ... ... ... ... ... ,.. ... ... 49 
 
 adjustment of, limits fatigue 49 
 
 " Actual Time " 50,57-59 
 
 ratio of to " Works Time " 5S 
 
 ,, diminished by fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 59 
 
 "Actual Rate" 50,57-59 
 
 diminished by overtime ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... 60 
 
 "Balancing" ... 48,49 
 
 Blood pressure (test) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 9.12 
 
 Boracic Lint packers 32 
 
 details of work ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 32 
 
 output of ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 36 
 
 Canteens 4s 
 
 Charts, general description of ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... !J 
 
 Complex reaction time (test) 8,10,13,14,16,18,19,21 
 
 Co-ordination, loss of (" Monday Effect ") 9, 11, 12, 17 (Footnote), 19, 21, 30, 35, 43 
 
 Day and Night, reversal of ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 17 
 
 shifts, not to be reversed frequently 
 
 reasons for differences in fatigue development in 
 
 shift, development of fatigue in ... ... ... ... ..." ... ... ... 16 
 
 , sleeping by ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 17 
 
 Dyspepsia amongst workers ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 44 
 
 Early Morning Period, compared with Monday ... ... ... 
 
 effect of suspension of on output 44 
 
 ,, ,, suspended ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 34,46 
 
 Earnings increased when working day shortened... 
 
 Efficiency lessened by overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 49 
 
 " Equilibrium and Balancing " 1<S 
 
 Fatigue, accumulation of 
 
 development of by day and by night ... ... ... ... ... ..'. 16 
 
 greater production of at end of period, day, or week ... 
 
 ,, increased resistance to follows improved feeding 
 
 nature of ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7, 18, 21 
 
 persists when week-end rest suspended ... 
 
 produced by overtime 
 
 production accelerated by prolongation of period of labour ... 
 
 recovery from ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 17,22 
 
 complicated by illness 
 
 in a rest interval ... .. ... 19.20 
 
 less perfect after overtime 
 
 power of, greater at beginning of period of labour 
 prevented by overtime 
 tests for 
 similar tasks produce different amounts of ... ... ... 7 
 
 Feeding arrangements unsatisfactory ... ^ ... 
 
 Fish and chips 47 
 
 Fitness ... ... ... ... ... ... 21,48,60 
 
 Food and Feeding 41,44 
 
 lack of 30,44 
 
 conditions of taking 
 cost of in different forms 
 
 ignorance as to suitable ... 
 
 inadequate reduces output 
 
 General health affected by overtime 
 
 Health, general, of the worker 
 
 affected by overtime 
 
 C 1 O 1 7 
 
 Hearing, acuity of (test) 71701 
 
 Home life of worker ... ... ... ... ... ... ',17.31 
 
 Hours, shortened, effect upon output ... ... ... ... 37 
 
 11 
 
 11 11 
 
76 
 
 PAGES. 
 
 Illness, as cause of fatigue 21^ 
 
 effect npon accumulation of fatigue ... ... ... ... ... 14,1") 
 
 ., ,, recovery from fatigue ... 
 
 Lint, boracic, packers ... 
 
 details of work 
 
 output ... 
 makers 
 packers 
 
 ,, details of work ... ... ... ... ... ... 32 
 
 ,. output ... ... ... ... 32,3.' 
 
 in overtime ... ... ... ... 33,34 
 
 Meal times, disturbed by overtime .. ... ... ... ... 22,49 
 
 Mess rooms 
 
 Monday Effect " '.1,11,12,13,18,19,22,30,35,43 
 
 not shown by fresh workers ... 
 
 transferred to Tuesday 19 
 
 Night shift, development of fatigue in ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 16,22 
 
 " Nominal Rate " 50 
 
 " Nominal Time " ... ... 50 ; 59 
 
 diminished by fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 59 
 
 Nourishment, defective ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 47 
 
 Output, altered by alterations in length of working day... 43,58 
 
 ,, controlled by machinery ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 50 
 
 dependent on the worker ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 50 
 
 diminished by overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 60 
 
 effect of shortened hours on ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 37, 3<S 
 
 suspension of early morning period on ... ... .. ... ... 34,46 
 
 overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 37 
 
 factors controlling - 23 
 
 increased by shortened hours ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 38 
 
 in different periods of the day ... ... ... ... .. ... ... 49,57,58 
 
 increased by shortening working day ... ... ... ... ... ... 44 
 
 influences affecting ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ;.. 34 
 
 lessened by inadequate rest ... ~ 
 
 limited by fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 44 
 
 lowest in the day ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 57 
 
 early morning period ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 57 
 
 ,, overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 57 
 
 maximum ... ... ... '... ... ... ... ... ... ... 50 
 
 of overtime compared with other periods ... ... ... ... ... 33,34 
 
 of various periods of the day ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 31 
 
 of winders ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 24-27 
 
 on Saturday ... ,.. ... .,, ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 27 
 
 periods of high and low ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 31,34 
 
 tables of 24-26,29,30,32-40 
 
 , total dimished by overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 22 
 
 increased by suspension of overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... 22 
 
 unsatisfactory in early morning period, causes of ... .. ... ... ... 30,31,35 
 
 due to loss of co-ordination ... ... 35,44 
 
 Overtime, decline of output in, towards end of week ... ... ... ... ... ... 30 
 
 defeats its own object ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 43 
 
 distribution affects fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 22 
 
 disturbs existing arrangements ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 49 
 
 economically extravagant ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... 15,22 . 
 
 e.ffect depends on previous condition ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7,15 
 
 not confined to day on which worked ... ... .... ... ... ... 7,22 
 
 ., increased by repetition ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7,13 
 
 greater at end of week ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 7,12 
 
 of on output ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 37 
 
 fatigue produced by ... ... ... . . ... ... ... ... 9-13 
 
 ,. general health of the worker affected by ... ... ... ... ... ... 60 
 
 ,, more harmful than ordinary labour ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 16 
 
 on consecutive days ... ... '... ... ... ... ... ... ... 22 
 
 on Saturday 30, 31 
 
 output of, compared with other periods ... ... ... ... ... ... 33,34 
 
 ontput during ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 35 
 
 physiologically extravagant ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... 16,22 
 
 suspended ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 58,59 
 
 unpopular with the workers ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 35 
 
 unsatisfactory output during due to fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... 35 
 
 Office staff 13 
 
 fatigued ... 22 
 
76 
 
 PAGES. 
 
 Physiological state, differences in produced by overtime ... ... ... ... ... 1.3 
 
 work 15 
 
 Rates of working ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 51-60 
 
 altered by alterations in length of working day ... ... ... ... 60 
 
 s, limited by fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 67 
 
 " Rate, Actual" ' 50,57-59 
 
 diminished by overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 60 
 
 " Rate, Nominal " ... 50,59 
 
 "Rate, Works" !" 50,57-59 
 
 Reaction Time, complex ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 8,10-21 
 
 shortened by shortening of working day ... ... ... ... ... 61-63 
 
 values given by colours lower than those given by letters ... ... ... 8 
 
 Recovery from fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... 17,21 
 
 complicated by illness ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 18 
 
 in a rest interval ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 19-21 
 
 less perfect after overtime ... ... .. ... ... ... 49 
 
 power of, greater at beginning of period of labour ... ... 21 
 
 prevented by overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 18 
 
 tests for ... 19 
 
 power of ... 11 
 
 in rest interval ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 19 
 
 Rest interval recovery in ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 19 
 
 inadequate leads to lessened efficiency ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 21 
 
 ,, lowered output ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 22 
 
 time of retiring to disturbed by overtime ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 22,45 
 
 Saturday, overtime on 30,31 
 
 Sight, acuity of (test) 8,11,12,17 
 
 Summary, Section I. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 21 
 
 ,, II 43 
 
 Supervisors, unfriendly 22 
 
 Tests, description of 7 et seq. 
 
 results of a few only given 15 
 
 " Time, actual" 50,57-59 
 
 diminished by fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 59 
 
 ratio to " Works Time " 58 
 
 Time lost by workers 34,3.5,49,51,63-65- 
 
 ,, influenced by length of working day ... ... ... ... ... 64 
 
 " time, Nominal " 50-59 
 
 diminished by fatigue 59 
 
 Time, reaction, shortened by shortening of working day ... ... ... ... ... 61,62 
 
 worked 50 
 
 "Time, Works" ... 50,57,59 
 
 Vital functions, adjustment of 17 
 
 low at night ... 17 
 
 Wages, increased when working day shortened 44 
 
 Week-end rest, fatigue persists where suspended... ... ... ... ... ... ... 22 
 
 Winders, details of work ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 23 
 
 Worker, home life of 7,17,31 
 
 Working day, length of influences time lost ... .. . 63 
 
 shortened by Zeppelin raid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 57 
 
 shortening leads to improvement in general health ... ... ... ... 60 et seq. 
 
 increased wages 44 
 
 of shortens reaction time 61 et seq. 
 
 rate of, limited by fatigue ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 44 
 
 rates of 51-60 
 
 altered by alterations in length of working day ... ... ... ... 60 
 
 "Works Rate" 50,51,57-59 
 
 "Works Time" ... ...50,57,59 
 
 Zeppelin raid, shortens working day ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 57 
 
h 
 
 5 
 
 D 
 
 2 
 
 a 
 
 i 
 
 h 
 
 (0 
 
 O 
 
 - 
 
 o- 
 
 D 
 O 
 
 DC 
 
 I 
 
 Z 
 
 
 UJ 
 
 (\J 
 
 
 U. 
 
 O 
 
 
 h 
 
 
 
 Z 
 
 CD 
 
 Z 
 
 flC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 '-0 
 
 ^ 
 
 z 
 
 X 
 
 ul 
 
 
 UJ 
 
 u 
 
 > 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 DC 
 
 UJ 
 UJ 
 
 D 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BOBB 
 
 I2C 
 
 80 
 
 1230 530 80 
 FRI. 3"!? 
 
 6 O II 15 10 4 50 
 SAT.4T" 
 
 M B E R 
 
 Malby&Sons.Lith. 
 

THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW 
 
 AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS 
 
 WILL. BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN 
 THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY 
 WILL INCREASE TO SO CENTS ON THE FOURTH 
 DAY AND TO $1.OO ON THE SEVENTH DAY 
 OVERDUE. 
 
 
 
 ,:v 1 ,' V;Mh 
 
 JUN lg ^73 
 
 MA) 2 191it> 
 
 
 
 
 Vj Y 9 ft mm 
 
 
 
 
 M -- H 
 
 
 MYl3'58Kt 
 
 
 JAN 1359 
 
 
 6Ja'5SGr 
 
 
 OCT 1 3 1960 
 
 
 Alo2S'fiOGP 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 , J LD 
 
 
 MAY 19 1961 
 
 
 '"^^i'Qt!*t 
 
 
 
 
 
 LD 21-100m.8,'34 
 
Kent,;.. . 
 Second i 
 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES 
 

 
 HOME OF KICK. 
 
 SECOND INTERIM REPORT 
 
 ON AN INVESTIGATION OP 
 
 INDUSTRIAL FATIGUE 
 
 BY 
 
 PHYSIOLOGICAL METHODS, 
 
 A. F. STANLEY KENT, M.A., D.Sc. (OXON), 
 
 [TON WILLS rP.nFESSOli OF PHVSIOLOGT IX THE I'XIVKRSITY OF 
 
 to botl) Bouses of parliament tj> owmanU of 
 
 L O N U O N : 
 
 PEINTEI) liXDEE THE A C'lIK >IUT V OP JUS MAJESTY 1 iTIONEEl OFFICI 
 
 By DAEL1XC LIMITEB BACOK STHEEI !;. 
 
 To be purchased, either directly or through any Bookseller, from 
 WYMAX AND SOXS. LIMITED. 29. Biu 81 u FBI . LANE. E.C.. 
 
 28, ABINGDOX STREET. S.W., ai Si 3 ET, (.'AKDIFK; or 
 
 H.M. STATIONEEY OFFICE (SCOTTISH BEANI ft) 'OETB STUKET. EDIXBUEGH; or 
 
 E. POXSOXBY. LIMITED. IIU. Gn FTOIS STREET, DUCLIN; 
 
 or from the Agencies in the Rrilish Colonies nncl Dependencies. 
 
 the United States of America :nid oi.her Foreign Countries of 
 
 T. FISHER FXAVIN, LIMITED, LONDON, W.C. 
 
 1916. 
 
 [Cd. 8;i:s:>. , Price is. M.