: • ^# i?^' J > M ^ 'y C6e Ancient Eiturgi) of tfje Cfjunf) of aEnijlattti ACCORDING TO THE USES OF SARUM BANGOR YORK & HEREFORD AND THE MODERN ROMAN LITURGY ARRANGED IN PARALLEL COLUMNS BY THE REV. WILLIAM MASKELL M. A. S)ecanti (ZBtJitinn Jlontion WILLIAM PICKERING 1846 BX ^/-f/ -O / "^t- TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page HE Preface iv Ordinarium Missaa 1 Canon 78 Additional Note 143 Cautelas Missae 168 De mode exequendi officium dominica prima ia Adveiitu . 177 Orationes pro rege in missis dicendse 184 Modus induendi et exuendi Pontificem • • 185 Praefationes 191 Benedictiones episcopales 198 Orationes fld wJSffn(/(/OT, etc 201 Liturgia S. dementis 203 The Order of Communion, from the first Common Prayer Book of K. Edward VI 215 preface. CHAPTER I. N tlic Admonition entitled " Concerning the Service of the Church.^'"' which succeeds, if indeed it does not rather form a part of, the Preface to our present Book of Common Prayer, we find the following : " And whereas heretofore there hath been great diver- sity in saying and singing in Churches within this Realm ; some following Salisbury Use, some Hereford Use, and some the Use of Bangor, some of York, some of Lin- coln ; now from henceforth all the whole realm shall have but one Use." In this passage the word heretofore does not relate to the time immediately preceding the last review of the Common Prayer in 1662, for during more than 100 years, (with the exception of the period of the rebellion, and heretical ascendancy) there had been only one Use of saying and singing in Churches. We must go back to the beginning of the reign of Queen Elizabeth, and beyond that again to the year 1549, when the Eirst Book of King Edward the Sixth having been approved by Con- vocation, was put forth and enjoined by the authority of the Parliament and the Crown. In the Preface to that Book, there is almost word for word the same injunc- tion. So, the " Act for the Uniformity of publick Prayers, and administering the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies, &c. in the Church of England," (xiv. Car. II.) begins : " Whereas in the first year of the late b vi Iprcface, Queen Elizabeth, there was one uniform Order of Com- mon Service and Prayer, and of the administration of the Sacraments, Rites, and Ceremonies of the Church of Endand." And the Act alluded to, the first of Eliza- beth, refers in like manner to the last year of Edward the Sixth, declaring that then also there was " one uni- form Order." These Acts, we may therefore say, recog- nize the previous existence of various allowed Forms or Uses. There arc certainly some who very imperfectly under- stand what is meant by these old Uses of the Church of Entrland ; they have often remarked the passage which I have quoted from the Preface to the Prayer Book, and would be glad to learn something about it. AVheatley and Shepherd, authors generally appealed to, pass over without remark "the Preface:"' the latter however' in his Introduction does say, that " it is deserving of notice, that hitherto there had not been in England any one service established by public authority for the general use of the Church. In the southern parts of the island, the Offices according to the Use of Sarum, and in the northern, those of York, were generally followed. In South Wales the Offices of Hereford were adopted, and in North Wales, those of Bangor, &c. : " and so he passes on. Nor does Dr. Nicholls in his Commentary make any remark upon the passage. Bishop Mant in his se- lection of Notes upon the Common Prayer, has referred to Sparrow and Dr. Burn, who give no further information upon the subject, except indeed that Osmund, the Bishop of Salisbury, about the year lOTO, was the compiler of the Use of Sarum. * There are many again, who are better informed, but yet have never had an opportunity of examining any copies of the old service books which still exist, whether from living at a distance from public libraries, or from ' Introduction, p. xxxvii. Preface^ vii some other cause. Scarcely two years ago, in the pre- face to the first edition of this volume, I said my hope was, upon a consideration of the circumstances which I have briefly spoken of above, that an attempt to render accessible these books or portions of them, would not be unacceptable. I may now add, I trust without presump- tion, that my expectations have been amply realized. I have alluded to the difficulty of obtaining access to these old books : for so rare are they, that except in the libraries of the Bodleian, the University of Cambridge, and the British Museum, it is almost hopeless to expect to find them : occasionally, in a few instances, we may meet with a single volume, a Horae, or a Manual, or it may be even a Missal : but one book only will do but little for the student ; if he wishes to understand the subject, and to obtain more than a mere smattering of knowledge about it, it can be only after a careful exami- nation and comparison of the many volumes, among which anciently the Offices of the Church of England were distributed. And there are better reasons even than the fact of rarity, for making an effort to republish, in some form or other, either all or parts of the old books : of late years, the demand for them has increased tenfold, and their price, always great, has naturally increased with the demand : so as to put them, when they do occur, beyond the reach of men who are nevertheless the most anxious to obtain them. This has been one result of a return to a more sound theological study than had cha- racterized the clergy of an age, which has been emphati- cally styled by the Right Reverend Prelate of this Dio- cese, in a visitation charge, " an unlearned age." And it could not but be so : for a chief object of enquiry cer- tainly would be into the faith and practice, into the ob- servances and the w orship of their own particular Church, before as well as since the sixteenth century : and in the pursuit of this, they would be no longer content to viii Iprcfacc, rely upon garbled extracts, or the unfounded represen- tations of iirnorant and prejudiced, or slanderous histo- rians." Before the Reformation the pul)lic Offices of the Church of England were not contained, as they now are, in one volume, but in many : tlu'v were perfectly dis- tinct from each other, and intended for different pur- poses. I do not intend in this place to enter into a de- scription of these numerous books, as I have examined at considerable length the whole subject in a Dissertation pretixed to another work, the Moninnenta Uitualia. It must therefore be sufficient for me to refer the reader there, and extract one passage only from an edition of a Portifvrhnn secundum usum Saruin, published by Graf- ton and Whitchurch in 1544. This has at the beginning, a privilege and license of the King under his great seal to those printers, that they alone should print certain " bookes of devyne servyce, and praier bookes, that is to say, the Masse booke, y' Graile, the Hympnal, the Anti- plioner, the Processyonale, the Manuel, the Porteaus, and the Prymer." Of these books the "Masse booke" or "the Missal," contained the rites and ceremonies and prayers to be used in the celebration of the Holy Com- munion. The " Graile" or " Gradual" contained, often with the notation also, the various Introits, Offertories, Communions, Graduals, Tracts, Sequences and other parts of the Service. This volume was of course neces- sary for the more solemn performance of the liturgy in choir, and with the full attendance of the officiating priest, and his subordinate ministers. 2 AUachcd to this jjassaj^e in then expressed, thongh I do not the first edition, was a note, speci- think it necessary to repeat it. The fving as an example, a writer of the place referred to, is the second present day, Mr. Hallam; and I Chapter of his Constitutional Ilis- allude to it, because I sec no reason tory of England, for altering the opinion which I Preface. ix Before we pass on, I purpose first briefly to discuss what the meaning is of the term " Use." Upon this question, the chief difficulty seems to be, how far, or if at all, we are to include the varieties also which unques- tionably existed of music and chanting ? How much of ceremonies and rites, besides the bare words and order of the prayers, ought to be included, is another question and rests upon very different grounds : but when we speak of the Use of the Church of Salisbury, or of the Church of York, or Hereford, not only need we not in- clude the chants and music, but rather, if we wish to be precise, altogether exclude the consideration of them. It has been said, upon the other hand, by writers who take a different view, that the primary bearing of the passage from the Preface to the Common Prayer Book, before quoted " Whereas heretofore, &c." is " with refer- ence only to the various uses of plain-tune in the several Cathedral choirs," and it has been doubted " whether there ever was a Lincoln Use in any other sense than a different mode and practice of chanting." But when we take up a missal according to the Use of Sarum, and another of Hereford, and a third of York or Bangor : or again a breviary or a manual of Salis- bury or York, and compare them, we find most import- ant and numerous variations. The notation may or may not be contained in them ; very often of some portions it is, but subordinate, and may or may not differ also ; and in many service books, the Horse for example, is almost always omitted. And, as I have just said, there are numberless variations, which constitute the Use, and dis- tinguish the Offices of one Church from those of another, viz. different prayers : different arrangements of them : different ceremonies to be observed in the administration of the Sacraments : and whether a particular diocese of England anciently adopted the Use of Sarum or the Use of Hereford, would depend upon the acceptance of its manual and missal, and other service books, and have X Iprcfacc* no necessary reference to its mode of intonation. The diocese of Ely, for example, mio;ht observe the Use of the CMiurch of Sarum, and nevertheless adopt the music, allowing-, that is, that there were material differences, of the Church of York. Or it mig^ht retain some parts of each, with other intonations proper to itself: all which would have no influence upon the Use adopted by the Ciiureli of Ely. But if, upon the other hand, a part of the Offices of Sarum, and a part of Hereford, and a part of York, were taken and rearranged, with an observance of this one, and an omission of another ; this would con- stitute a new Use, viz. of the Church of Ely. 1 do not speak of one or two, and trifling diffbrences ; for these might allowably fall under the head of peculiarities. I do not mean to say that, in an improper and wide sense, we may not include under certain circumstances, the mode of intonation adopted and ordered by any Church, in its Use. Thus, we cannot separate the no- tation of a noted manual or missal of the Church of Salisbury, from the Use of that Church, at the time when the particular volume, which we may be examin- ing, was written or printed. But the Book would still be the missal or the manual, " secundum usum Sarum," if there was not one musical note contained in it : or at different periods during the 13th and 14th centuries, the music may have varied very materially, and yet the Use of the Church of Salisbury have continued one and the same. The references which the rubrics, especially of the manual, frequently make to notation, aff'ect not as it appears to me the question in dispute. Some cite, as a proof that the music must necessarily be included within the meaning of the term " Use," such directions as, " Omnes orationes dicuntur cum ' Oremus' sub tone pra^dicto ; " or " dicat Sacerdos sub tono consueto ; " or "cum cantu sequenti;" or "dicat Sacerdos orationes sequcntcs sub tono lectionis;" or, once more, "dicat in IPreface. xi more prsefationis." But the ecclesiastical tones to which these rubrics refer, either immediately follow, or pre- cede : or they might be, as especially in the case of the " tone of the lection" or " the tone of the Preface," well- known and fixed, yet nevertheless not the same tone in every diocese which adhered strictly to the Use of the Church of Sarum or of York. They do not prove that the same music was necessarily to be followed, as were the integral portions of the public offices which made up the " Use." I do not deny therefore that the title " secundum usum Sarum," or " ad usum ecclesise Eboracensis," or " Herfordensis," prefixed to a Breviary, or Hymnal, or Psalter, signifies sometimes in the printed books, not the prayers only but the mode of singing authorized at the time in those dioceses ; but then such books must be noted : if they do not contain the music (which is not unfrequently the case even of Psalters and Graduals) they would still be, quite as properly and with the title also, "secundum usum," as the case may be: and this in its proper sense, relating solely to the variety and arrangement of the prayers, hymns, and Psalter, rites and ceremonies. Some have said that "the Hymnarium, the Psalter, the Gradual, and the Pontifical," are Choral Books, and noted, and therefore that we cannot exclude music from the notion of the term " Use." But not to speak of the utter absurdity of calling a Pontifical a choral book, the others did not necessarily contain the notation : and the Psalter, for example, according to the Use of any Church, is entirely independent of the tones which may accom- pany it. Hence, when printing became general, we find many examples of the Psalter "secundum usum" of whatever Church it might be, with the lines ruled for the music, which however is not printed also, but left to be filled in with manuscript. This of course would seldom happen in earlier ages, when the entire volumes were xii Iprcfacc. manuscript : and therefore, affords an additional and not a li^ht proof wliy we must not arj^ue hastily from such expressions, as " cum tono sequenti," and " dicatur hie cantus." Yet, in the same way, in MSS. we occa- sionally find the services of festivals of late institution, such as of S. Osmund, or of the Transfiouration, or of the Msitation of tlic Blessed Vir<;in, fully arranged and determined upon " secundum Usum :*' but the music not written in, although the proper lines and spaces may be left for it. And it is in the sense in wliieh I have above explained it, that we find the term Use employed by the ritualists : it will be unnecessary for me to cite more than one ex- ample, from Gavantus : wlio, describing what is meant by the Breviary according to the Use of the Church of Rome, says it is so called, because it contains the Prayers authorized by that Church : and immediately before, in a fuller explanation, he particularizes the Lessons, the Psalms, Hymns, Legends, &c. and the Rubrics by which each day's Office is to be ascertained ; but not one word which has reference to the music-^ It is not improbable that much of the doubt which has been thrown over the term Use, has arisen from the fre- quent occurrence of the verb caiito : " cantare missam secundum usum," &c. But nothing is more certain than that Canto does not always, especially in the earlier writers, mean to sing in the modern acceptation. To adopt the words of a most eminent w riter : " Cantare missam priscorum phrasi illi dicebantur, qui sine cantu, et privatim cclcbrabant."^ And so again IMabillon, after citing a particular Canon, adds: " Verbum ctinendo interpreter de privata recitatione, nee aliam interpreta- ' Thesaurus Sacr. Hit. toin. ii. De Lit. Gall. p. 379. />. 10. Compare MfthiWm. Dis- •* ]ioun. Herum Liturg. lib. i. ([uisitio de Cursu Gallicano. i^. \ . coj,. xiii. 5. Preface. xiii tionem scquentia patiuntur.''^ Thus an old " Expositio Missse," edited by Cochteus,^ says : " Prima autem ora- tio super corpus Christi futurum, secreta dicitur, et secrete canitur." Which the margin explains to be " secreta oratio legitur.'" And, once more, a passage in the " De- fensorium Directorii" of the Church of Sarum, is very much to the point. " Item ilia duo verba quae ponuntur in multis festis, sic : Invitatorium triplex, nihil oneris imponunt sacerdotibus qui dicunt ofRcium suum sine nota : sed solum pertinent ad illos qui cantant officium cum nota."^ Here the Use whether with or without music would continue equally and perfectly the Use of Sarum ; and no distinction as regards it, either depends upon, or is involved in the addition of a chant. But there would be no end of accumulating examples of this sort ; and if the reader wishes to examine further the whole subject which I have been discussing, I would recommend him, among other books, especially to read the dissertation of Mabillon " De Cursu Gallicano,'! to which reference has ah^eady been made, and I think he will be satisfied that music does not form, except in an extended and improper sense, any part of what we ought to understand by the term " Use" of a Church. One word also, before I pass on, upon the expression in the passage in the Preface to the Common Prayer Book ; " the great diversity in saying and singing," and '^ now from henceforth all the whole Realm shall have but one Use." It is possible that the reformers, among their multiplicity of plans, did intend to enforce an uni- formity in singing also throughout the realm : but, what- ^ De Cursu Gallicano. §.46. " Speculum Ant. Devotionis. ;^. Gerhert de Musica, torn. i. p. 326. 140. cites the same canon, and explains ' Monumenta Ritualia. vol. i. p. it " de privata horarum canonica- 344. The reader will there find rum i-ecitatione." See also p. 35.'>. the whole of that important trea- 559. &c. tise. xiv Iprcfacc. ever they may have meant by the words just quoted, I think that it is quite clear tliat the First Common Prayer Book of K. Edward, and all succeeding ones, were not in fact aimed at the abolition of varieties of music, but of a variety of prayers, and rites, and ceremonies. This object was effected. A diversity of singing nevertheless continued, not only in different dioceses, but also in dif- ferent churches of the same diocese : and I am not aware that at present, there is any rule, except the Precentor's pleasure, even for the daily singing in a cathedral. How^- ever, we do not conceive the Preface to the Common Prayer to be evaded, or the Act of Uniformity to be broken by this, whatever may be said of other practices. JNIerbecke, as is well known, about a year after the pub- lication of the First Book, tried something of the sort w liich the reformers hinted at ; but his book was unau- thorized, limited in its impression, and never reached a second edition :^ which it necessarily must have done, if either the demand for it had been great, or an attempt made to recommend it. Elizabeth in her Injunctions, which were supplemental to Jier Act of Uniformity, and were grounded upon an especial clause in that Act, at- tempted to supply the deficiency : yet they did not enjoin a particular or one mode of singing, but simply that there be "a modeste and destyncte songe used in all partes of the common prayers in the Churche.'-^ The portions of the Missals which are reprinted and arranged in this edition, form but a very small portion of their respective volumes : but by far the most important. ' See however a note in the Churches heretofore, there hath Dissertation on the Service Books, ben Icvynges appointed for the Moniiiiienta Rituulia. vol. i. p. mayntenaunce of men £(r6«j, TK SiX ypxix^oLToq SiSx^xq ; To Trpo? ai/aroAa? Tsrpxp^xi xxtx Tr,v TrpoTS-o^YiV, 7^o^o^ iSiSx^iv rifxxg ypxy.fMX ; Tx Tr,g STriXAr^crEcog pr,[JI.XTX iTTi TJJ XVX$H^H TO'J XpTO'J T»)f Enp^apiCTTta? >C«i TOV TTO- Tnpiov Trj? ivXoyixg, Tig tuv xyiuv syypx^ug ri/xn/ xxTxXiXonrfu ; Ov yxp Sri Tovroig xpxovy.i^x, wv o XTroiTToXog ?) to ivxyyiXiov E7ri[xi/r,(Tvri, xXXx xa» izpoKiyo^iv y.xi nnXiyo^iv iTipx, ug [xsyx- ArI^ sp^ofTa Trpog to fxv(TTripioi/ Tru/ kt^vu, ix. Trig xypxiv vpurtv ti? Xoyog yiypxu- IxiMog i$i$x^t ; To $i Tpig |3a7rTi^£o-6ai toi/ xv^wttov, Trohn ; AXXx 01 (j. 18. Preface. xxix further observed : " it was not in the Apostle's power to conceal the outward part of the mystery from them, w ho by the countenance of their new teachers had been emboldened to break in upon the Eucharist, without being* duly qualified ; and therefore the only way that he had left to him, to prevent their further contempt and abuse of it, was to let them into the fuller knowledge of it."^*' Such an exception, as we can see so evidently the cause of it, confirms the rule which it is not to be denied S. Paul appears most carefully at all other times to have observed. And we have further proof how carefully our Saviour's caution was obeyed from the very obscure manner in which the ante-Nicene fathers, when they speak at all, speak of the Eucharist : so obscure indeed, especially near the apostolic age, that none could understand their import except those who had been fully admitted into the communion of the Church. No article relating to it w^as inserted into any Creed ; and the very probable reason has been given, which must occur to every reader, that Creeds were forms of faith, to be taught the cate- chumens in order to their baptism : but not so the Eucha- rist ; which w^as considered too sacred to be spoken of in w^ords at length, but to the perfect only."^ Take also, 2« Johnson. Unbloody Sacrifice. settled in the Faith. " Difficulta- VolA.p. 57. The same writer has tern rei prooemio," says that Father, some very forcible remarks upon the in his epistle to Evagrius, " exag- omission by S. Paul in the Epistle gerat dicens, super quo multus est to the Hebrews, of any notice of nobis sermo interpretabilis, non the prefiguration of the Christian quia Apostolus id non potuit inter- vSacrifice, in the oblation of Mel- pretari, sed quia illius temporis non chisedeck : there was apparently, fuerit. Hebraeis enim, id est Ju- but for some powerful motive, every dseis, persuadebat, non jam fideli- reason why he should then enter bus, quibus sacramentum passim into it : and this, as S. Jerom tells proderet." us, was because he thought it not " Upon this, .Johnson has the proper to discourse of that Sacra- following. Unbl. Sacrifice. Vol.1. p. ment familiarly to people, not yet 2(35. " The reasons they had for the XXX Preface. for example, the famous passage in S. Justin : in a part of liis Apology, where he is giving an account of the concealment of these mysteries (of the Sacraments) were in sum, to shew the great esteem they hail ot them, and which they by this means en- deavoured to imprint upon all that were admitted to the knowledg-e and enjoyment of them : and at the same time to guard, and if possible secure them from the flouts and objections of Jews and heathens, and of all whom they thought too light and frothy, to be entrusted with things so very weighty and serious, and yet of so peculiar a nature, that there was nothing in the world, that could in all respects be compared to them. For they justly believed that a Divine Power went along with the Sacraments, which was reason enough why they should set the highest value upon them, and desire that others should do so too ; and yet they knew the visible signs of these Sacraments to be heggarhf eleinents, things in their own nature very cheap and common ; and they might without the gift of prophecy, easily foresee, that the enemies of Christianity would always be ringing in the ears of all that were well atfected to Christianity (as the Deists and Quakers are perpetually labouring to persuade our people) that there can be no such effects of Water, Jiread, and ^Vine, as priests of the Christian Church would have them believe. And there is one thing peculiar to the Eucharist, which made it more liable to scoffs, than ajiy other ])art of our religion ; which is that the Uread and Wine were believed to be the very Body and Blood of Christ ; no wonder if they were much upon the reserve in this point ; since all must be sensible, that nothing in the Chris- tian Theology, could have afforded more agreeable entertainment to the drolls and buffoons of the age; for whatsoever is most extraordi- narv, and elevated above the con- dition of other things, which seem to be of the same sort, lies most exposed to profane wit and mirth, when that which gives it its worth and excellency, can only be believed and not seen : and no doubt Ter- tullian spoke the sense of all the learned Fathers of his own, and of the succeeding times, in those ob- servable words, ' Nil adeo quod obduret mentes hominum, quara simpUcitas Divinorum operum, quae in actu videtur; et magnificentia, qua; in effectu repromittitur.' " This verv scarce work of John Johnson, has been long promised in a new edition : which is much to be wished for, as it would undoubtedly be productive of the best effects, in establishing a more sound view of the doctrine of the Blessed Eucha- rist, than, I am afraid, generally exists amongst us. It is not with- out faults : but as a whole, it reflects honour upon the Church of which its author was a Priest, and may claim a place in the highest rank of our standard works, for learning, judgment, and acutencss of reason- ing. Preface. xxxi ceremonies of the Christians in their common worship ; how carefully he speaks, how anxiously he seems to weigh every word, lest he should say, even upon such an occasion, too much. " Upon the day called Sunday," he tells us, " we have an assembly of all who live in the towns or in the country, who meet in an appointed place : and the records of the Apostles, or the writings of the Apostles are read, according as the time will allow. And w^hen the reader leaves off, the President"'^ (o 7rpo£Si\o^sv, aXX' Reeves renders the word. See his cktov Suya[/.s5c(," This has reference note upon the passage. Vol. I. p. to a written hturgy, and there 107. seems no ground for the opinion of those who would argue from these 25 Compare, from the thanks- words of S. Justin, for the use of giving in the Clementine Liturgy, extemporary prayer in the Service " £yp(^af j-. , tt i « «or. „ , „ , .„ , A?iirl. V index. Vol. 3. p. 332. from the fathers, to illustrate the 39 Articles, printed at the Press of ^ Opera. Adv. Haeres. P. 400. the University of Cambridge, and Ecc. Angl. Vindex. Vol. 3, p. therefore with some kind of autho- 299. xxxiv Iprcface, places Avhich might be appealed to in the primitive fatliers, I shall add an extract from a rare book, once hitihly popular in this country, and, in a sense, autho- rized by the Church of England to be distributed among the people, for their instruction, viz : " The Ordinarye of a Christen man." The author is speaking of Alms- deeds. " The xij. maner of almesdedc spyrytuell is to offre or to make offrynge to God the fader, the blessyd Jesu cryst his sone, with y^ ryght holy sacrament of y' awter ; and this almesdede here surmounteth syngulerly in two thynges, all those other good dedes that may be sayd or thought, that is, in dygnyte and in generalyte. —There is the breed and the w}Tie, flesshe and blode, y<= ryght holy refeccyon of crysten soules.''^^ Besides, from allusions which we find frequently in the fathers to a pious opinion which they held, how cer- tain is it that they could not have believed the Blessed Elements to be any longer common bread and wine. 8. Chrysostom, for example. " Mri on oc^to<; s£(. AXAa ucnrip x.npog Trupt 7rpo(r- oy.iXn(rcc; o'jSbu a,7rov(rnx.C,Bi, ov^ii/ Tripidcrvoa' ovru xa» uSs vo/xi^t (c-jvavaA»(r>i£(rOaj) tx fj.\jijrr,pix tii tou (T'xi/.xroq o'o vi^uv rov £7rtou(riov Sog r,y.iv (Tr[J-spov. o ocp- TOf o'jTOf xo»i/of, o-jx £(rTH/ £7riou(riOf. ocpTOi; o£ ovTog ocyiog, im- o-jo-iog i(TTHi. — ovToq ccpTog, o'jx. £if xoJA^a^ p^wp£i xa» £K oc(piSpu]ix £xj3aAX£Tar «AA' £K -rrxa-xv arov rrtV (TV. 320. These, and other authorities, Optatus, An- gustin, Ca'sar Arelatensis, S. Am- brose, &.C. are cited by most of the ritualists. Mr. Palmer argues from its oiimsion, the great antiquity of the Clementine Liturgy, speaking of it as a )-emfnkabie sign. lie says : " Without doubt the Lord's prayer was used between the prayer of the deacon and benediction of the faith- ful, which precedes the form to. dyioL, &c. all through the patri- archate of Antioch in the early part of the fourth century. Yet it does not occur in this part of the Clementine Liturgy. Now it is not credible that the author would have omitted this prayer if it had been used long before his time. Yet from the manner and language of (lirysostom and Cyril we perceive that it must have been used long before theiv time. They both seem to regard this prayer as coeval with the rest of the liturgy : they do not allude to the idea that it had not been formerly used in that part of the liturgy. Since then, the Lord's Prayer was not used, or was but recently used, in the time of the author of the Apostolical Con- stitutions, and yet appears to have been long used in the time of Cyril and Chrvsostoni, we must infer that the Apostolical Constitutions were written much before the time of Chrysostom and Cyril." Origines Lit.i. p. 40. •" Upon the arguments for its high antiquity from what the litur- gy of 8. CleuK'Ut does, and does not contain, see especially /,^^?'mh, whose admissions from his peculiar opinions upon written Liturgies, are very valuable in this respect. Opera. Tom. 2. pp. 23. 24. 30. 208. •*■"' Joltnson. Unbl. Sacrifice and Altar unvailed, vol. ii. p. 148. *" Hickps. Christian Priesthood, vol. i. p. 141. (Edit. 1711.) Hoth these well-known passages are cited very frequently by Brett. Iptcface. XXX ix Office in the Apostolical Constitutions is the standard and test by which all others are to be tried. And by comparing them with this, the innovations and additions in after times, be they ^ood or bad, will appear." Being then so valiia])le a record,*^ I cannot think that a reprint of it will be out of place in the present volume. We may refer to it as Bishop Hickes has recommended : we may look upon it with Johnson as, in substance, the Apostolic Form, and so learn to judge more truly than we otherwise might of old and modern liturgies. As such a guide I would regard it, not to the exclusion of the Jerusalem, or Alexandrian, or Roman,*^ (as if they had not also sprung from the teaching and example of Apostles) but as containing in an earlier form than, as we have them now, they do, those rites which are essen- tial to a valid consecration and perfecting of the Eucha- rist, and without which no Service, though it may claim the name, can be allowed to be a Christian Liturgy. After the Council of Nice, and in the age immediately preceding, additions were unquestionably made to the original Form used in the various Churches. Most of these are easily to be traced : and the observation of S. Paul to the Corinthians in his first Epistle, where he says, " there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved maybe made manifest among you," is as applicable to the public services and rituals of the Catholic Church, as to the opinions of her individual '" It is surely scarcely necessary whole liturgies, yet it is certain that for me to remind the reader, that there were such in the oldest times, we have also an equally valuable by those parts which are extant : commentary upon it, in the 5th as " Sursum corda," " Vere dignum Catechetical Lecture of S. Cyril. et justum," &c. Though those which are extant may be interpo- ''■^ " That there were ancient li- lated, yet such things as are found turgies in the Church is evident : in them all consistent to catholic S. Chrysostom, S. Basil, and others : and primitive doctrine, may well be and though we find not in all ages presumed to have been from the xl IPrcface. members.*-* During the short space when there was indeed but one mind and one Faith, there was little need of cautious phrases, and additional safcfruards by which the truth niitrht be preserved : very different how- ever was the case after the time of Arius, and Macedo- nius, and Nestorius ; and epithets even became neces- sary, which in purer days would, perhaps, but have seemed to mar the earnest simplicity of the Church's prayers. first, especially since we find no original of these liturgies from an- cient councils.'' Ansiver of the Bishops to the exceptions of the Ministers. Cardwell. Hist, of Con- ferences, p. 350. *" As Vincentius of Lirins says upon this text of S. Paul : " Ac si diceret : ob hoc haereseon non sta- tim divinitu3 eradicantur auctores, ut probati manifesti fiant, id est, ut unusquisque quam tenax et fidelis, et fixus Catholica? fidoi sit amator, appareat. Et revera cum quaeque novitas ebullit, statim cernitur fru- raontorum p^ravitas, et levitas palca- rum : tunc sine magno molimine excutitur ab area, quod nuUo pon- dere intra aream tenebatur." Ad- ve7'sus Hcereses. § 20. Iprcface. ^^i CHAPTER III. E must now pass on to consider the particular Liturgy, from which the ancient Uses of the Church of England are usually supposed to have heen more immediately derived. The Roman was among the earliest, and soon became the chief, of the Patriarchates of the Catholic Church. The contentions of neighbouring provinces, the irruptions of barbarians, the local influence of her bishops, and above all, under God, her anxious and untiring energy in the cause of the propagation of the true Faith, rapidly strengthened the primacy of the Church of Rome : and within eio-ht hundred years of the death of our Blessed Lord, she had obtained throughout the West almost im- perial power, and in the East considerable influence. We might naturally, therefore, expect that in the remains of antiquity which have been spared to us, we should find a complete liturgy which she had used from her first foundation, with perhaps also a history of it, detailing exactly the various alterations which it has undergone. But we know little about it. Writers who lived long ago, and to whom some accounts we may have supposed would have come down, speak in very general terms. Durand contents himself with saying, "In primordio nascentis Ecclesiae missa aliter dicebatur, quam modo. — Sequenti vero tempore epistola tantum, et evangelio recitatis, missa celebrabatur : subsequenter Coelestinus Papa instituit introitum ad missam cantari. — Csetera diversis temporibus ab aliis Papis leguntur adjecta, prout Christianse religionis cultu crescente, visa sunt decentius convenire."^ And as we go back some four hundred •'•" Rationale div. off. Lih. 4. Cap. I. 5. xlii Iprcface, years, Walafrid Stralx) tells us what is still less satisfac- tory, " Quod nunc airiuuis uiultiplici orationum, Icc- tionum, cantilenaruui, et consecrationum otiicio, totum hoc Apostoli, et post ipsos proximi, (ut creditur) oratio- uihus et commemoratione passionis Dominicee, sicut ipse pra'cepit, agebant simpliciter.'"^^ Hence is it, that some who dislike the authority of liturgies have denied to the Roman all claim to any great age : and have ascribed its first beginning as a Form, to Gregory the Great, or to Gelasius, or Vigilius, or Leo, in succession Bishops of Rome. Others, on the contrary, have boldly given it to S. Peter, as the sole author, at least of the Canon, and that it has come down to us in the main points unimpaired. Those authors from whom I have just made extracts, state their full conviction of the truth of this : for example, Walafrid Strabo, in the same chapter : " Romani quidem usum observationum a beato Petro accipientes, suis (j[ui- que temporibus, quae congrua judicata sunt, addiderunt.*' And, more expressly, an Archbishop of our own Church, TElfric in his pastoral epistle : " Now was the mass established by our Lord Christ ; and the holy apostle Peter appointed the Canon thereto, which we call Te igitur.^'^- The later ritualists, men of the greatest learning and of unwearied labour in these inquiries, take the same ground. Gavantus declares that S. Clement received the Roman liturgy from S. Peter. ^^ Le Brun also : " Roman* ecclesi'dc liturgia dubio procul ex S. Petro per traditionem derivatur."** Georgius again : " De rebm Ecvle.i. Cap. 22. Saxon Laws, &c. Vol. 2. ]). 381. J[ir/;/j. after premising, " quantum invonire 1.^^.2. Merati in his notes tells j)Otuinuis, exponanius." And he us of the Altar preserved at Home, then gives much such an account upon which S. l*eter is said to have of additions, as Z)Mrrt«^/ and other offered the Eucharist. Tain. \. p. writers. 130. "Cap. 39. T/i'nhc. Anglo- ^' Opera. Tom. 2. p. 78. Ipreface. xiiii " Sacrarum caerimoniarum origo, ab Apostolicis tcmpo- ribus ducta, viam nobis stravit ad Romanae liturgi;i! vetustatera, ciijus primordia, et ordinem beato Petro ecclesia llomana debet." ^^ But the chief authorities upon which these opinions rest are of S. Isidore, who Uved in the seventh century ; and of Innocent I. in the fifth. The first tells us : '* Ordo missse vel orationum, quibus oblata Deo sacrificia consecrantur, primum a sancto Petro est institutus," and he adds, what certainly was incorrect, '' cujus celebrationem uno eodcmque modo universus peragit orbis." ^'^ Innocent lays down the same, in a passage too long to extract, in an epistle to the Bishop Decentius : and from which Georgius draws this conclusion : " Heus quanta ex hoc plane aureo S. Innocentii Pontificis testimonio hauriuntur ! Vides enim Ilomanam ecclesiam, a sancto Petro, ut diximus, ordi- nem missse edoctam." ^^ But much more sound is the interpretation which Cardinal Bona,^^ with whom agrees Pinius,^^ puts upon the last sentence of S. Isidore ; and which I would extend to the other early authorities to the same purpose : " Hoc de re et substantia, non de verborum tenore et cseremoniis intelligendum est." For as the truth is unquestionably not with the advo- cates of the first of the two opinions which I have men- tioned, so with some limitations, although it may not be freed from all objection, we may agree with the other. To name as the author of the Roman liturgy any parti- cular Apostle, is beyond possibility : but the essential rites which are in all ancient liturgies, are to be found also in the Canon of the Church of Rome, in every age, up to the most early, through which we are able to trace S5 De Lit. Rom. Poiitif. Tom, Tom. 1. p. 188. 1. jt>. 9. See also 3Iartene. De " 7-,j„j, j ^, 10. Ant. Ecc. Rit. Tom.l. p.'dQ. ss Rprum Liturg. Lib. 1. Cap. ■ ^« De Eccles. Officiis. Lib. 1. 7. v. Cap. 15. Bib/. Patrum Atict. ^^ Dc Lit. Ant. Hispanica. P. 2. xliv Iprcfacc! it. \Ve may assert therefore that it springs equally ^vitll them from the Apostolic Form : and that it has preserved all those essentials with a most jealous care, whilst succes- sive Bishops have exerted their legitimate power, ami added such prayers and ceremonies as they thought fit. As Muratori says, " Canoni certe, in quo tremendi mysterii summa consistit, nihil unquam additum fuit, quod vel minimum suhstantiam rei mutet." ^ In attempting to give a most brief account of the Roman liturgy, I said in the preface to the first edition of this work, that we could not do better, as regards it, than adopt the words of a very careful inquirer, (to whose labours both upon this and other subjects,*^^ the English Church owes a heavy debt of gratitude,) the author of the Orig'uies Liturgicce. I should have to appeal to the same sources as himself, and I have found no reason, after further examination, to suppose that any other plan would be more advantageous now. He tells us then, " that many of the mistakes' into which men have fallen on this matter have arisen from confounding tw^o very difi^erent things, the missal and the liturgy. The missal is a larjre volume containinjr a number of missa', or offices for particular days, which were to be added in the Canon.^^ By the liturgy we are to under- stand the" Ordinary and "Canon which did not vary. ** De rebus Liturg. P. 119. one, to exclude the other portions ^' More particularly, in his ex- of the missal from it; in the pre- collent Tveatiae uf the C'hnrrh, a sent instance it is allowable, if we work to which we must attribute include, as I doubt not was intended, very much of the better tone of the Ordinary with the Canon. It theology which of late years has is much to be wished that Mr. Pal- di.stinguished writers in the English mer had remembered his own defi- Church. nition ; and not upon the other hand *" I have no hesitation in adopt- extended somewhat improperly the ing Mr. Palmer's account, but we idea of a Liturgy, in giving such a must take the term Liturgy in its title as Oriisiurs Liturgicce to his vKisI striil xcn.sr, and an unusual whole work. IPrefacc, xiv and the number and order of the prayers which were to be added from the missal. — It is acknowledged that Gregory collected, arranged, improved, and abbreviated''^ the contents of the individual Missae, and inserted a short passage into the Canon, viz. Diesque nostras in tua pace disponas, afque ah cEterna damnatione eripi, et in electorum tuorum jubeas grege numerari. He joined also the Lord's Prayer to the Canon, from which it had previously been separated by the breaking of bread. All this amounts to positive proof that Gregory was the re- viser and improver, not the author, of the Roman Liturgy."^* '* Seventy years before Gregory, Vigilius, Patriarch of Rome, in an epistle to Profuturus, Bishop of Braga in Spain, says that he had received the text of the Canon from Apostolical tradition : he then gives him a description of it, which coincides accurately with the Roman liturgy in subsequent times." " Before him, Gelasius, Patriarch, a. d. 492, ordained prayers or col- lects, and prefaces, and arranged them in a sacramen- tary, which in after ages commonly bore his name." ^ I would add from Muratori : dia agrorum et bestiarum, servitium " Certe vetustis saeculis Praefationes dominis praestitum, ut alia impedi- complures in usu fuere. Hasce menta omittam. Hosce, ut opinari sauctus Gregorius M. ad paucas fas est, absterrebat a sacris prolixi- nunc usitatas redegit. Psalrni etiam tas Liturgise. Idcirco satius visum integri adhibiti antiquitus, sive can- fuit, eamdem contrahere, et pra?- tati in missa fuerunt ; idque ex non sertim postquam praeceptum inva- uno Sancti Augustini loco, et ex luit de Missa audienda singulis Do- Homiliis sancti Petri Chrysologi minicis, aliisque Festis solennibus." constat; verum nostris temporibus De rebus Liturg. p. 14, versiculus tantummodo ex iis cani- ^' So Ilenaudot observes : " In tur, aut recitatur. Cur autem a Latina ecclesia, praecipuum locum sancto Gregorio PontiSce breviata obtinet Canon Romanus, qui, quod . fuerit Liturgia, id factum suspicari a Gelasio Papa primum, deinde a licet ad majus Fidelium commodum, Gregorio magno, in eam quam atque ut omnes divinis Mysteriis in- nunc habet formam reductus est teresse possent. Olim quoque mul- Gregorianus vulgo appellatur." Dis~ tos occupabat cura filioium, custo- scrtatio. Vol. 1. p. 8. xlvi Iprcface. Again, " a manuscript sacramcntary is in existence, sup- l)ose(] to have boon written before the time of Gelasius, evidently referring to the same order and Canon as that used in his time : and is known by the name of the Leo- nian Sacramcntary. Leo the Great, Bishop in 451, is said to liave added certain words, which also are speci- fied ; sa/icffon sacrificiinn, iyninacuhitam ho.sfiam : so that the remainder of the Canon was in existence before his time." " Some time again before Leo, Innocentius the Bishop speaks of the Roman rites as having descended from S. Peter the Apostle,*"^ and there is no sort of reason to think that they differed materially from those used by Gelasius at the end of the same century." And we are brought to this conclusion : " That this liturgy was substantially the same in the time of Gelasius as it was in that of Gregory, that it appears to have been the same in the time of Innocentius at the beginning of the fifth century, and was then esteemed to be of Apostolical anti- quity.'" "^ •^ Muratori, p. 10, says, " Accipe nunc, quae de ipsa llomana Eccle- sia Anno Christi 416, hoc est tot ante Gregorium Magnum annos, scripserit Innocentius I. summus Pontifex: 'Si instituta Ecclesiastica ut sunt a beatis Apostolis tradita, Integra vellent servare Domini Sa- cerdotes, nulla diversitas, nulla va- rietas in ipsis Ordinibus, et Conse- crationibus haberetur.' Addit infra : ' Quis enini nesciat aut non adver- tat id, quod a principc Apostolo- rura Petro Komana; Kcclesia) tra- ditum est, ac nunc usque custoditur, ab omnibus debere servari.' " J/r. Palmer gives the same passage from Lnhbc. Concil. 2. 1245. ** Origines Liturgicaj. Vol. l.p. 1 1 1 — 1 19. To add the opinion of a very learned writer : " Neque enim a Grajcis sacros ritus Romani acceperunt, sed ab Apostolorum principibus." MuratorL p. 13. And the very succinct account which another ritualist gives us : " Komana; Liturgia? triplex veluti ordo sen status considcrandus est, Unus primigenius, ab Ecclesiae na- scentis exordio ad Gelasium usque rcceptus : alter Gclasianus, aucto- rcm sou amplificationcm habens (ielasium Papam ejus nominis pri- nuim : tcrtius Gregorianus, ita dic- tus ex nomine Gregorii M. qui Ge- lasianum ordinem correxisse memo- ratur. Qualis fuerit primigenius ilk", non omnino constat. Gclasia- nus diu desideratus est : sed tandem ilium e tenebris eruit vir de ecclesia Preface* xivU The reader, if he wishes to enquire further into this most interesting" suhject, will find a good account of the various additions and alterations made from time to time in the liturgy of the Church of Rome, in a not uncom- mon hook, the Thesaurus Sacrorum Rituum of Gavan- tus ; toDi. i. p. 322.^^ But he will do well to correct this by the older ritualists, Walafrid Strabo and others ; and especially by two most ancient histories of the changes made in that Service, which have been printed by Geor- gias in the appendix to his third volume, De Liturgia Ro- mmii Po?itificisJ'^ These were found in the celebrated manuscript of the Queen of Sweden, now preserved in the library of the Vatican. But before we pass on, I cannot but add, as to a single point, the authority of one of our own most celebrated men, the Venerable Bede, who was almost a contemporary of him of whom he is speaking, Pope Gregory the Great : " Sed et in ipsa missarum celebratione tria verba maximse perfectionis plena superadjecit, ' Diesque nostros in tua pace dispo- nas, atque ab seterna damnatione nos eripi, et in electo- rum tuorum jubeas grege numerari,'"^^ When, however, we speak of additions, these were as regarded the Ordinary and Canon, small both in num- ber and extent : and there can be but little doubt, that bene meritus Josephus Thomasius. pulum. At in Gregoriano tres Gregorianus demum in usu com- tantum ad singulas INlissas assig- muni est modo apud omnes fere nantur orationes, qiiarum una ante ecclesias, notis et observationibus a epistolam, altera secreta, tertia post Menardo nostro illustratus. Gre- comraunionem." MahiUon de Lit. goriani a Gelasiano totum discrimen Gallicana. Lib. L Cap. 2. iv. Com- est in varietate et numero earum pare also, Gavantus. Thesaurus, orationum, quas Collectas vocant : Tom. \. p. 5. nam caetera utriusque eaedem om- *^^ I mean the Edition to which I nino partes sunt. In Gelasiano refer in these notes, with the excel- duse aut tres ante epistolam ora- lent commentary' of Merati : 3 vols, tiones ; uuica secreta ante prsefa- folio. 1763. tionem ; atque duse post commu- *'^ Append, x. xi. nionem, quarum una est sujirapo- '^ Hist. Eccles. /<7». 2. cap. i. 87. xiviii Iprcface. the liturirv, in its strictest sense, of the Church of Rome was in the earliest centuries considerahly longer than it now is ; which is indeed certain, if S. Gregory, as it lias been remarked, not only arranged but abbreviated it. Therefore, it would at that time be more like the other ancient lituriries, and the account given us by Justin ]\Iartyr. Muratori'*' observes, that as in the Greek Churches before the Preface prayers were said for the whole church, for kings, for catechumens, &c. and others again, after the consecration, for the clergy ; so an old Latin writer upon the sacraments, speaking of the Eu- charist, says : " in it praises are offered to God, and prayers for the people, for kings, and others." But in the Roman Canon, as it has been for a thousand years, the Pope, the Bishop of the particular Church, the king, &c. are recommended to God, not merely in very few words, but in the secret prayers. And as I have ob- served below, P. 72, Note 89, there were formerly many more Prefaces than there are now. It is a most interesting question (one which we can scarcely hope to be answered because of the almost cer- tain destruction of all copies of it which may be identi- tied,) what was the primitive liturgy of the Churches of England before the arrival of S. Augustine. The diffi- culty seems to be acknowledged, by very eminent autho- rities. Azevedo says, " Angiicani autem officii nullum est monumentum, quo cognosci possit ante 8. Gregorii a^vum, qui evangelii pra^cones ad Christianam religionem restituendam illuc misit.'"' And Mabillon, to cite no more : " Qualis fuerit apud Britones et Hibcrnos sacri- ficandi ritus, non plane compertum est. Modum tamen ilium a Romano diversum extitisse intelligitur ex Ber- nardo in libro de vita Malachiai, ubi JNIalachias barbaras '" De rebus Liturg. p. 14. " Do ili\ ino Officio. I^xercit. ix. }>. 47. Preface. XllX consuetudines Romanis mutasse, et canonicum divinao laudis officium in illas ecclesias invexisse memoratur." ^'^ Certainly Azevedo is speaking of the offices of the cano- nical Hours, rather than of the liturgy ; and so Mabillon also seems at least to do, although he begins with speak- ing of the "ritus sacrificandi :" but there is so great a connexion between the two in such enquiries as the pre- sent, that any information as regards the one, throws some light upon the other. We are left therefore to conjecture : and I think we may agree with Mr. Palmer,^^ who inclines to the Use of Gaul, that having been the nearest Christian province, and her Bishops the probable ordainers of the British. I would not appeal to the judgment of Bishop Stilling- fleet as of much weight in this particular matter, so hastily does he seem in his Origines BritanniccB to have settled questions of rituals and liturgies, and so much was he inclined to misrepresent his facts : still, it may not be amiss to add, that with his characteristic boldness, he decides the difficulty in the same way. Speaking of some ancient MSS. still extant, of the Gallican service, he tells us : " From these excellent monuments of anti- quity compared together, we may, in great measure un- derstand the true order and method of the communion service of that time, both in the Gallican and British Churches." Presently the same writer assures us, that we may obtain from those records of the Gallican li- turgy " a just and true account of the public service then used in Britain."'^ The ancient Gallic Churches used the same order of prayers in the celebration of the Eucharist, although, as appears from three editions published by Thomasius, and ''^ De Lit. Gall. /«5. i. cojo.2. xiv. 180. To which 1 would refer the Compare also Gerbert. Vetus Lit. reader. Aleman. torn. i. p. 75. " Origines Britannicee. p. 240. '^ Origines Liturgicae. %wl. i. p. 1 Ipvcfacr. from a fourth by Mabillon, the prayers themselves some- what differed : a brief description of their arraiioement is given by Martene in his excellent work, " De anti- quis Ecclesiic ritibus."'^ He says : The Gallic liturgy began with an antiphon, which was sung by the choir. This was followed by a Preface or sermon to the people, in which the priest exhorted them to come with due reverence to the holy mysteries. Silence being then proclaimed, the priest saluted the ])eople, and after their response, said a collect, which the people heard upon their knees. After the collect the choir sung the Trisagium, which was followed by the canticle, " Benedictus Dominus Deus Israel." (These, however, were omitted during Lent. ) Then came lessons from the Prophets and the Apostolic writings, after which the Hymn of the Three Children was sung. This was followed by the reading of the Gospel ; before and after which the Trisagium was again sung, and the peo- ple gave the response, (still continued by tradition in the English Church,) " Glory be to Thee, O Lord." Afterwards the Bishop either himself preached, or, if he was infirm or ill, ordered a homily to be read by a priest or deacon. Then the appointed prayers were said by a deacon for the Hearers and Catechumens. These latter having been dismissed, and silence enjoined, the bread and wine were brought in, and an oblation of them made, whilst the choir sung an anthem called SomaUy or more properly, Sonus : which according to IVIartene, who is followed by Gerbert'^ and Le Brun," upon the authority of S. Germanus, answered to the Offertory of later times. Then the sacred Diptychs were read, the collect ;>os/ nomina was said, the kiss of peace given, and tlie collect