Governrnenl A Fiharxce ' .':■'■ !n;The United states Carl C.Plehn p |iPilliiil!l!illr .!;iiM[iii;!ii MhW Vn-^k is P^' SO ^yx^^' K- ■PA^CH UUVM uos At^*^ 3£U&' „vUF The National Social Science Series Edited by Frank L. McVey, Ph.D., LL.D., President of the University of North Dakota Now Ready GOVERNMENT FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES. Carl C. Plehn, Professor of Finance in the University of California THE COST OF LIVING. Walter E. Clark, Pro- fessor and Head of the Department of Political Science in the College of the City of New York TRUST AND COMPETITION. John F. Crowell, Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal MONEY. William A. Scott, Director of the Course in Commerce, and Professor of Political Economy, University of Wisconsin TAXATION. C. B. Fillebrown, President Massa- chusetts Single Tax League, Author oi A B C of Taxation THE FAMILY AND SOCIETY. John M. Gilette, Professor of Sociology, University of North Dakota BANKING. William A. Scott. THE CAUSE AND CURE OF CRIME. Charles R. Henderson, late Professor of Sociology in the Uni- versity of Chicago In Preparation PROPERTY AND SOCIETY. A. A. Bruce. THE AMERICAN CITY. Henry C. Wright STATISTICS. W. B. Bailey BASIS OF COMMERCE. E. V. Robinson WOMEN WORKERS AND SOCIETY. Annie M. McLean THE NEWSPAPER AS A SOCIAL FACTOR. Allan D. Albert THE STRUGGLE FOR LAND IN AMERICA. Charles W. Holman Each, Fifty Cents Net A. C. McCLURG & CO., PUBLISHERS. CHICAGO Government Finance IN THE UNITED STATES BY Carl C. Plehn, Ph.D., LL.D. Professor of Finance in the University of California CHICAGO A. C. McCLURG & CO. 1915 3 ^Z.a^ Copyright A. C. McClurg & Co. 1915 Published September, 1915 Copyrighted in Great Britain W. F. HALL PRINTING COMPANY, CHICAGO EDITOR'S PREFACE C! TN the publication of Dr. Plehn's book on Gov- ernment Finance, The National Social Science Series has presented a somewhat rounded-out discussion of financial topics. Professor Scott's '^j books on Money and Banking and Mr. Fille- - brown's book on Taxation furnish the first three, and Dr. Plehn's book is the fourth. *, This book deals with government finance, not ► in a technical way, but in broad, comprehensive ^ manner that will furnish a guide to the reader ' who wants to know something about the methods pursued by governments in the collection and expenditure of money. The reputation of the author as an expert in the field of Public Finance is a guarantee of its worth and value. F. L. M. AUTHOR'S PREFACE 'T'HE aim of this little book is to describe, very briefly, what the federal, state, county, town, and city governments in the United States are doing that requires money, how they spend the money, where it comes from, and what the peo- ple get for it. We have also tried to see whether we are ordering our public affairs well or ill. We find that government spending is outrun- ning government income. But the things for which governments are spending money seem for the most part good. The increased costs have, however, strained the existing revenue sys- tems to the breaking point. New revenues are necessary, especially for the states, and we have ventured to recommend a state income tax. Although this recommendation is our thesis and runs throughout the book, we trust that it is not so over-emphasized, as to spoil, for those more interested in the narrative, the picture we have endeavored, first of all, to draw of govern- ment house-keeping in the United States. Berkeley, California, C. C. P. August, 1915. CONTENTS PAGE Chapter I. The Problem 1 Chapter II. In General on the Economics of Government or the Evolution of Public Business 6 Chapter III. The Difficulties of Stating the Cost of Government 20 Chapter IV. Our Federal Finances 25 The History of the Cost of War .... 33 The Scope of Federal Activities .... 37 Efficiency and Economy 40 The Equation of Receipts and Expenditures 41 Federal Debt 42 The Debts of the Great Nations: Table . . 44 Chapter V. State and Local Finance, Exclusive of Municipal 46 Examples of State Finance 51 Chapter VI. Municipal Expenditures .... 66 City Expenses 69 General Government 69 Protection to Person and Property ... 71 Highways Id Charities l(y Education 11 The Grovi^th of Expenses 79 Per Capita Departmental Expenses: Table . 81 Contents PAGE The Meaning of the Averages 83 Public Service Enterprises 85 Per Capita Governmental Cost Payments for All Purposes, 1912: Table ... 86 Municipal Outlays 93 Grand Total of All Government Costs . . 94 Chapter VII. Efficiency in Government Business 96 The Budget 97 Boards of Control 100 Efficiency in Cities 102 The Proportion of Expenditures for Differ- ent Purposes 104 Chapter VIII. Public Borrowing 106 Chapter IX. The Equation of Receipts and Ex- penditures 116 The Federal Government 118 Federal Receipts: Table 119 State Governments 122 Examples of State Revenue Systems . . . 123 Rhode Island's State Revenues, 1913 . . .124 Kentucky's Revenues, 1911 127 County and Local Revenues Other Than Large Cities 130 Municipal Revenue 133 Conclusion 136 Tax Reform Now in Progress 140 Improved Administration 141 Separation of State from Local Taxation . 143 Classification 146 Independent State Taxes 147 References 157 Index 159 GOVERNMENT FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM T^HE great problem of government finance is the wise expenditure of the public funds, to ensure that they promote in the highest degree the general welfare of all. There have been many peoples, once indus- trious and prosperous, who, later, becoming bur- dened with taxes misspent, or with tribute car- ried away by their conquerors, have sunk into poverty or slavery. On the other hand, some Utopians and Socialists dream of a future state where all the fruits of labor are to be taken in the first instance by the government, and yet those same fruits are to be so wisely used on the nourishment and uplift of the people that a civilization indescribably perfect will arise. The imperfections and weaknesses of .human nature and of human beings seem ever to stand in the way of any realization of such a dream. Yet, does the mind reject it as a thing not among the possibilities? Be that as it may, a wise order- Government Finance ing of its public housekeeping will help much to move a people over some part, it may be very small indeed, of the long, long road which leads from making bricks without straw under the taskmasters of Pharaoh toward "the holy city, new Jerusalem," the goal of the Utopians. Today, the chief problems of taxation, or the raising of revenues, are in a fair way to be solved. That is, it can be asserted, with as much certainty as is possible in any branch of human affairs, that, given the will to do so, and the knowledge of how to do so, which, unfortunately, is not always present, the legislature can devise laws and the administrative officers can enforce them so as to bring about an equitable distribu- tion of the tax burden. Dififerences of opinion still exist as to the propriety of using the power of taxation in a manner to alter existing condi- tions, as well as to the direction in which it may be desirable to alter them. But if the ideal adopted be solely raising, in an equitable manner, the tax revenues deemed necessary, with the least possible disturbance of the position of the different taxpayers one to another, the way to a realization of such an ideal is known. This is so, partly, because scientific study has been longer directed to questions of taxation than to those of public expenditure; and, also, because the aims and principles involved are necessarily more definite and final. Governments, like individuals, must first pro- vide out of their incomes for certain necessities, The Problem and if there be money over, they may spend it for comforts and even for luxuries. Like indi- viduals, governments have different ideas as to what comforts and luxuries it is desirable to pro- vide, and like individuals, also, they are not even at one as to what are the necessities. Again, conditions change from age to age, so that like expenditures may not have like import- ance or like effects. Viewed superficially there is a possible resemblance between the free dis- tribution of corn in ancient Rome and old age pensions in modern England. But who would be so bold as to assert that popular education and a wise administration of the modern " donations " may not avert from England, in this case, the evils which panis circusque created in Rome, and which are supposed to have contributed so largely to the weakening and downfall of the Roman people? The virility, energy, and pros- perity of a people are dependent upon the entire complex of its public and private activities, not upon any one, and the private life and character of the people may determine directly the success or failure of the best meant public enterprises. Economists from Adam Smith to those of to- day have ever been alive to the fact that the problems of "consumption," that is, those relat- ing to the effect of the uses to which the fruits of labor are put, are quite as important as those relating to the production of wealth and its " dis- tribution " or division among its users. Although we have here and there a few statistical studies, Govcrmuent Finance a few brilliant essays, many bright epigrams, and, outside of these, a considerable body of homely popular proverbs, we may search in vain for any- thing like a " theory " or any " principles " of con- sumption or of the use of wealth. Not only does the extreme complexity and variety of the prob- lems — in that they differ not merely from one community to another, but almost for every family — appall the investigator, but their ex- treme mutability drives him to despair. If he should solve the problem as to how much better, or worse, men became when kerosene lamps took the place of candles, he has to do it all over again when the electric globes take the place of lamps, and so on to the end. Another phase of our problem, or, perhaps, only another way of looking at it, is given fre- quent expression. When we " reform," improve, or partly perfect our tax system it often comes about that more money can be raised with less sacrifice, or less sense of sacrifice, on the part of the taxpayers. Legislators are prone to seize upon this new money and spend it for new pub- lic activities or enterprises, some wise, others wasteful. The taxpayer, who, when consenting to the tax reform, had expected that if the "tax dodgers " were made to pay, his own taxes would be reduced is thus disappointed. He pays as much as, or more than, he did before and he observes that the total spent is far greater. " What was the use of tax reform," he asks, " if there is no guarantee of tax reduction, no The Problem protection against increased taxes?" He then demands a "tax-limit" law. This is, of course, raising a false issue. The question is not, " How much money is spent ? " but, " Is it wisely spent ? " A community may well "afford" to pay heavy taxes for good schools, and ill " afford " to pay low taxes and go without schools. But at the same time a tax- limit law has great merits, for it imposes the necessity for a more careful scrutiny of each proposed expenditure, and its justification. A government running on a deficit is more econom- ical and efficient, as a rule, than one which is striving to spend an unnecessary surplus. Too much income may be as bad for a government as too much pocket money for a rich man's son. The problems of government expenditures are a part of the general problems of consumption. Although in themselves simpler than the prob- lems of private consumption, because public activities are relatively fewer and because they are formulated after discussion and by definite consent, yet they present many of the same diffi- culties. It is on this account that no complete theory of government expenditures can be pre- sented in the following pages. For the further reason that the space has been restricted by the editor, the discussion will be confined to a study of existing expenditures in the United States, federal, state, and municipal, and even within that field mainly to practical questions now pending and for which some solution is sought. CHAPTER II IN GENERAL ON THE ECONOMICS OF GOVERNMENT OR THE EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC BUSINESS 'T'HERE is a popular saying which associates taxes and death as two unavoidable evils which afflict humanity. If there be not a brighter side to taxes than this association of ideas sug- gests, this book will be dismal indeed. If, however, human life is interesting as a study, then taxes, and the uses to which the pro- ceeds are put, which touch so many, many sides of human life, must have an interest too. From birth to death we live and have our being in closest contact with taxes, or with the result of taxation. The roof which shelters us, the land beneath us, our clothing, food, and drink are taxed. With the proceeds of taxation, govern- ment assures us protection for life, and oppor- tunity for liberty and for the pursuit of happi- ness ; it educates us, disciplines us, and molds us in very many ways. There are a few human beings in the world today who pay no taxes. But these are the lowest savages who have no organized com- munity life, who are without true nationality and without government, and who, for the most part, live under conditions of dire poverty and misery. The moment these savages unite their efforts or Economics of Government their means for a common end, be it for war or for the maintenance of a tribal religion, or what- ever else may appeal to their primitive instincts as a desirable common end, that moment they begin to pay taxes ; not necessarily in money, but more often, at first, in services, labor, and fight- ing, in weapons, or in religious " ofiferings." The people of highest civilization are all pay- ing heavy taxes. While it cannot, of course, be said that heavy taxation causes a high civiliza- tion, nor, conversely, that a high civilization causes, necessarily, heavy taxation, yet the two always go hand in hand. The reason for this is that experience has shown that very many of the highest advantages of civilized life are best won by common efifort through government. In so far then as taxes are used to promote the highest ends of the race, they are to be regarded as blessings rather than evils. There are obviously many good things which men can obtain and enjoy solely by organized efifort, continued through long periods of time. Such organized efifort takes two forms — that of public enterprise and that of private enterprise. The former is conducted through political or- ganization, or government, the latter through vol- untary private associations. There are some good things obtainable by or- ganized efifort which the experience of ages shows us can be had properly only by political organization, that is, through government. These ultimately require taxes. Thus, no organized 8 Government Finance government can be built up by private enterprise only. Without political organization there would be no one to decide what are to be the laws, and no one to see that the laws are carried out. There would, also, be no satisfactory means of protect- ing national existence, no assurance of Having together in peace and happiness, of keeping evil doers from destroying life and property, or of adjudicating disputes, so that they may not lead to §trife. These things are so clearly and uni- versally political, that whenever any of them are done by private enterprise the case is regarded as purely an exception to the proper and estab- lished order. Thus, when, during the Revolu- tionary War, the United States was too poor to build an adequate navy, we entrusted the work of chastising our enemies on the seas to pri- vateersmen who went into the enterprise for the booty they might win. But we did so with deep- est misgivings and sorrow, recognizing that this was a surrender of government power. Taxes for patriotic purposes cannot be classed as evils; they support what is most precious to us. Those peoples who have been unable to pro- tect their national life, and have fallen into the power of other peoples, however comfortable, in some cases, their subsequent lives may have proved, have suflfered deeply from the disgrace. Disaster, also, always overtakes those nations which do not maintain order within their coun- try's boundaries. There are other good things which govern- Economics of Government ment does, and which we generally agree should be done by government, which are not quite so essentially public or political in character. They might be done by private enterprise and have been so in many cases. But they are made public enterprises because we desire to promote through them some ends which we regard as high and vital and which private enterprise is not likely to protect. A conspicuous example of these is afforded by the public schools. There are ex- cellent private schools and it is conceivable that all instruction might be left to private initiative, but so long as we hold, as President Eliot ex- presses it, that "we must all press on together toward our national goal" — an enlightened and intelligent democracy — we must also hold that compulsory education in public schools at com- mon cost is a proper activity of government, and we must levy taxes for that purpose. As governments improve, and demonstrate their ability to do things well, we come to en- trust more and more things to them. Thus, the field of private enterprise is gradually curtailed and that of public enterprise is gradually ex- tended. The list of such things now done by government is so extended that to enumerate them all would be tedious. As examples, there may be cited in addition to schools : ( i ) roads, canals, public charities, hospitals, museums, art galleries; (2) the postal service, lighting, public parks, water works, and recently street car serv- ice, and the provision and operation of electric lo Government Finance plants. Government, also, regulates more and more all private life and business. Not to be confused, however, with the second group above, that is, the public utilities, are manufactures and the like conducted by gov- ernments without the recognition of an essential public purpose. Yet some ideal of public ad- vantage seems to creep into every such activity. Thus, the manufacture by government for profit of Dresden china, of Sevres ware, or of Gobelin tapestry is defended as also upholding sound ideals of art. Whenever a new enterprise is taken over into this field, it is interesting to note that at first it is regarded as though it were still quasi-private, and it is conducted along lines very similar to those along which it was conducted before, when it was a purely private enterprise. But grad- ually the public purpose, which must have been there, if the taking over were justifiable at all, comes to be more and more emphasized, and ulti- mately becomes the paramount purpose. Although governments rarely surrender any activities, yet the converse of the above principle is also true ; that is, that whenever a public pur- pose which once existed disappears, the public enterprise from which it has disappeared drops back into the realm of private enterprise, and is left to be cared for by private action. Religion was one of the very earliest of public activities. Yet today "the established church" is a disappearing public activity. In our own Economics of Government ii country, never having been able to agree upon any one among the warring religious denomina- tions, we do not feel that the support of religion is a truly public function. Yet it would not be very difficult to frame a strong argument that it is so. This is partly recognized when churches are exempted from taxation. What then is the difference between a public enterprise and a private enterprise? This ques- tion is most important, for it lies at the threshold of government finance. The answer may be illustrated by a review of the arguments in a famous controversy over an activity which is still in the debatable territory between public and private. Years ago when railroads were first be- ing introduced, debate waxed hot in France, Ger- many, Austria, and Italy, and, to a lesser extent, in other countries, as to who should build, own, and operate the new means of transportation. Those who urged that the government should own and operate railroads claimed that they were " by nature " public enterprises, while the other side insisted with equal vigor that they were " by nature " private enterprises. This point certainly should have been conclusive, if there had been any means of ascertaining which they were " by nature." The one side saw in railroads primarily their utility in time of war, their power to divert trade and thus to build up or pull down cities and to alter the ways and means of living for people in many communities, and felt that they involved 12 Government Finance far reaching other possibilities and powers of national extent and of political import. This side also feared that in private hands railroads would be a means of exploiting the public, or that they might fail to give a service that would provide for the well-rounded development of all parts of the country and of all classes. The other side saw in railroads primarily the opportunities for the investment of private funds. They emphasized the necessity for that energy and push which individuals give under stimulus of anticipated profit. But more than that, they feared that the weakness of public administra- tion with its lack of energy and all its " red tape " would render the railroads failures and make it difficult to secure capital. They feared that locating railroads where "public policy dic- tated" — even if not corruptly determined — might result in neglecting service where it was most needed, as demonstrated or measured by the fact that it would be most profitable. The existence today of successful railroads under both systems does not aid us to settle the controversy. But it does show that they are not " by nature " either private or public. That there are, however, public interests of a paramount character involved is demonstrated by the fact that even where the private railroads have been most successful, government " regulation " has been found necessary. In the light of what has gone before, it appears that a public enterprise is made so by the fact Economics of Government 13 that the government or the people regard the common ends which may be promoted by it as of paramount importance, and fear that if the en- terprise were in private hands those common ends would not be as fully conserved as they should be. It helps to clearness of thought if we recognize two groups of public activities. These two classes, to be sure, blend imperceptibly into one another at their margins, there being many activities in a neutral territory between them, but at the extremes they are perfectly distin- guishable. The first consists of old established governmental activities which are universally re- garded as absolutely essential to the existence of government, or which form its means of ex- pressing itself. The second consists of these which have been at times, and can, conceivably, still be conducted as private activities, but which, because of the recognition of a paramount pub- lic purpose, have been taken over by government. Some one may object that a definition of a " public " enterprise, which merely says it is one which is so regarded, is not very useful. He may demand a definition which will enable him to recognize a public enterprise without having to look into the statute books to see how it is regarded. Such a demand can not be met. The fact is that the only test of what is a public en- terprise is the crystallization of public opinion as expressed in the law. And public opinion, al- though guided by the ideas above illustrated, is sometimes very fickle in this field. 14 Government Finance The difference between a public and a private enterprise is not slight merely because it orig- inates in regard or opinion. The treatment of each is entirely different, the point of view from which it is regarded, and, above all, the aims are different. The aim of private enterprise is pri- vate profit. Even when the promoters and man- agers of a private enterprise, as not infrequently happens, take a broad view of their duty to others, profit as an aim can never be entirely lost sight of. If it is, the enterprise dies. The only notable exception, which may or may not be con- sidered as " proving the rule," is afforded by the churches. The aim of a public enterprise is not profit, but public service. The books of a pri- vate enterprise are kept in such a manner as to show the " investment," and the current products or earnings from which, after deducting costs, the profits are derived. Thus a private school, properly run, keeps books which show the cost or value of the plant in lands and buildings and in equipment, and it charges as costs not merely the salaries of teachers and other employees, but interest on the investment. It measures success in terms of the difference between the tuition fees received and all these costs. No matter how much pride the management may have in the high quality of the education offered, the funda- mental reason for maintaining and improving the quality of instruction is the desire to draw more pupils and to make more money. Contrast with this the running of the public Economics of Government 15 schools. Once the bonds, if there were any, which were issued to raise money for buildings, have been paid, it no longer serves any practical purpose, generally recognized, to keep an ac- count of the investment. Hence there is usually no account called the capital account, and although modern accountants set up such ac- counts for governments they have only a hypo- thetical meaning. But far more important is the fact that the main purpose of the public cost ac- count is not to enable the school board, or the public, to measure the profit, but to enable them to find out how much they must raise. This is commonly expressed as fixing the income by the expenditures, a procedure which cannot very well be followed by a private enterprise. Suc- cess is measured not in terms of dollars and cents of profit, but in accomplishment, in serv- ices, in the character and efficiency of the pupils, and mostly in things which can never be meas- ured in money at all. In illustration of this we may cite a statement of the measure of success or failure of public schools from ex-President Eliot of Harvard, who in his little book entitled More Money for Public Schools, supports the demand set forth in his title as follows : " My first argument in support of this proposi- tion is that, as a nation and, on the whole, in spite of many successes, we have met with many failures of various sorts in our eflforts to edu- cate the whole people, and still see before us many unsurmounted difficulties. It is indisput- 1 6 Government Finance able that we have experienced a profound dis- appointment in the results thus far obtained from a widely diffused popular education. It was a stupendous undertaking at the start, and the diffi- culties have increased with every generation. Our forefathers expected miracles of prompt en- lightenment ; and we are seriously disappointed that popular education has not defended us against barbarian vices like drunkenness and gambling, against increase of crime and insanity, and against innumerable delusions, impostures, and follies. We ought to spend more public money on schools, because the present expend- itures do not produce all the good results which were expected and may reasonably be aimed at. " Lastly, the final test of the value of the edu- cation given to an individual or to a nation is continuous mental growth. The human body has a continuous development up to the age of twen- ty-five or thereabouts, should then have a long period of level health and strength, and after sixty may be expected to decline. There should be no corresponding stages in mental develop- ment. The growth of a man's mental and spirit- ual powers should be continuous through life, and his last years should be his best. It is this continuous mental development which proves bet- ter than anything else that the education received in youth was effective, and that the subsequent mode of life has been all along wholesome and improving. If we include in this growth the de- velopment of what is called character, this con- Economics of Government 17 tinuous enlargement and improvement is the supreme human feHcity." There is nothing in this that refers to profits which are measurable in money. The private school collects its revenues from the parents of the children educated. But the public school educates many a child whose par- ents contribute little or nothing in taxes, and often collects from the childless rich man enough to educate a dozen or more children. It is enough to say to such a rich man, " You must pay be- cause we have decided that education is a com- mon end. You shall pay as you are able and not on the basis of any benefit directly traceable to you." A rich man may protect his own property from thieves and from fire by guards, watchmen, and fire extinguishing apparatus, or insurance, and a poor man may have little or no property to enjoy the protection afforded by the police and the fire department, but neither fact is held to excuse either of them from a tax for the maintenance of a general police force or a fire service. If, in the foregoing illustrations, the difference between a private enterprise and a public one is possibly obscured by the fact that the activities considered have been public for so long a time that we are no longer capable of imagining them as private enterprises, then an illustration chosen from a field where the two kinds of enterprises can still be seen side by side may be useful. When a private company supplies a city with 1 8 Government Finance water, its officers keep strict account of every cent expended in the plant, and vigorously de- mand that the " rates " allowed shall give them a fair return upon that " investment." They can collect " rates " only from water users ; no one else would dream of paying. The city takes over the plant and operates it. At first the city fol- lows, with rare exceptions, the same old plan of operation as the private company. As long as there are bonds outstanding which were issued in payment for the plant, some account is kept of the capital investment. Costs are all carefully kept track of and the management endeavors to show a profit. Rates are collected only from water users. But unlike the private company, the profits are not the main consideration. Street sprinkling, the flushing of sewers, public health, and other purposes gradually assume a greater importance. As time goes on, the bonds with the proceeds of which the plant was purchased are paid off, and with the disappearance of the interest charge, the "capital" or "investment" account becomes a formal matter of bookkeeping of little more than historical or statistical interest. Improvements are made out of the earnings, or the service is improved for the same rates, or the rates to users are reduced. In any event, the time comes when the public water works are doing their work at rates to the users which no private enterprise could possibly live on. The difference in rates, however, is not evidence of a difference in cost. In fact, generally speaking, Economics of Government 19 public management is really more costly. The difference between the rates and the true cost is money which is either the proper earnings of the investment in the plant, or money which comes out of the general taxes. In the first case, it is analogous to interest on money invested by the citizens, paid to the rate payers in the form of a remission in rates. In the second case, it is the payment of salaries to the administrative officers out of general funds not charged up to or col- lected from the water-rate payers. Such an enterprise is thus on its way to be- come a purely government function. While no city water works of any importance have so far gone through the whole evolution, and are main- tained entirely by taxes, yet by the analogy of other public enterprises they will do so. The most recent illustration, perhaps, of this tendency is free textbooks in public schools which takes the last remnant of the cost of education from the parents. CHAPTER III THE DIFFICULTIES OF STATING THE COST OF GOVERNMENT A NY figures, whether of aggregates, ratios, or averages, intended to express the cost of government must be used with extreme care. Their interpretation is in no case easy and they can be true as applying only to the limited and restricted purpose for which they have been compiled. In the first place, up-to-date statistical data for a complete total of all governmental expend- itures in the United States are not available. The Census reports on wealth, debt, and taxation, while excellent, are not complete. They appear only once in ten years and even then refer to two or three years previous to publication. Hence, some estimates must be used. Very complete data for cities of over thirty thousand inhabitants are frequently published by the Census Bureau. The gap in the available data is mainly as to the ex- penditures by small local communities. Few states undertake to compile these expenditures, and when they do the results are often very imperfect. A fertile source of errors, which it is hard to eliminate, is the transfer of funds from one divi- 20 Cost of Government 21 sion of government to another. The state often collects school moneys, transfers them to the counties, which in turn transfer them to the school districts. If care be not taken they may be counted three times. In the second place, the word "cost" may be variously interpreted. Thus we may mean by the term " annual cost," the total of all expenditures, whether for running expenses, new property, such as buildings, parks, public utilities and the like, interest on debt, payments on the principal of debt, and, perhaps, other things. Or, again, we may restrict it to the " cost to the taxpayers," excluding all expenditures made out of earnings from industries like the post-office, or the sale of public lands, or from investments and the like. Other limitations which might be necessary will readily occur to the reader. My own estimate of the average annual per capita expenditures of all branches of govern- ment in the United States, exclusive of our in- sular possessions, is, for years like 191 1 or 1912, not less than forty dollars and not more than forty-five dollars. But I cannot claim for this that it is more than an intelligent guess based on long familiarity with the published reports and guided by many years of experience and study. There being at present no available means of making an accurate estimate, this is the best that we can do. Of course this forty or forty-five dollars does not mean the amount that you pay, nor that I 22 Government Finance pay, nor even what is spent through government agencies upon you or me. Some men pay much more and a multitude much less. Some men are directly benefited by an expenditure of much more than forty or forty-five dollars apiece per annum ; and others, most of us, by much less spent upon us directly. Indirectly, of course, as the protection of government is indispensible, and as we could not provide it for ourselves, un- aided, we all benefit far beyond this moderate amount. While in a vague general way it is the aim and theory of government to make us pay as we are able, and to spend upon us in accord with our needs, even that aim is never wholly realized. To emphasize again the danger of using such figures without careful regard to what they are intended to cover, we may examine the data pre- pared by Professor E. V. Robinson for the Min- nesota Tax Commission, and bearing on the " cost of government in Minnesota." So far, no more careful study of such data has ever been made, and the following remarks are not in crit- icism, but are intended merely to illustrate the difficulties of interpretation : Professor Robinson finds, for example, that the Federal Government collected on the average some seven dollars per capita in various taxes in 191 1, and somewhat less than four dollars per capita more from other sources, the total being ten dollars and eighty-five cents. But the Pro- fessor, being interested to know what it cost the Cost of Government 23 people of Minnesota to support the Federal Gov- ernment, suggests that as Minnesota people are found to be something over fifty per cent weal- thier than the average for the United States, they probably paid fifty per cent more per capita of the federal taxes, or say ten dollars and seventy cents apiece, in taxes instead of seven dollars — to use his figures. It is, of course, perfectly clear that there may be a difference between states as to their per capita share of the federal taxes. But does it necessarily follow that the rich Min- nesotans, just because they are rich, smoke more tobacco, drink more beer and spirits, and buy more imported goods subject to tariff, on the average, than do their poorer fellow citizens of other states? The mere possibility of questioning this, shows the difficulty of interpretation. All along through the text these difficulties have beset us. We have tried to guard against misinterpretation by various devises or phrases to show the limits of our data. " Gross expend- itures," or " payments," is a phrase used to cover everything passing out of a given treasury, in- cluding transfers to other branches of govern- ment, costs for commercial enterprises, interest on debt, investments, and repayment of debts, as well as the actual net cost of running the gov- ernment. " Net cost to tax payers " is another term which is used to imply the expenditures stripped of investment earnings and the like. The census bureau has set up an elaborate terminology for the different class of payments to 24 Government Finance which the reader is referred for further enlight- enment. We have not adopted that terminology in this book because it seems to use in a limited and restricted way terms used differently in com- mon everyday language. We have followed the Census Bureau in the use of the term " outlay," which means an expenditure for acquiring land, buildings, or anything of a permanent char- acter. An "outlay" is in contrast to "running expenses." CHAPTER IV OUR FEDERAL FINANCES ' I 'HE Federal Government is spending today in round numbers about a billion dollars per annum. A little over a hundred years ago, in the year 1810, the United States Government paid out in all $8,474,000, or eight-tenths of one per cent of present-day spending. This latter sum included $3,163,000 for interest on the public debt, which had been incurred during the War of Independence, so that the ordinary cost of government was then $5,311,000. We have chosen the year 1810 for comparison with the present rather than one of the earlier years of the existence of the Federal Government, because the expenses of the earlier days were somewhat abnormal, owing to the readjustment of the debt and the necessarily large expenses involved in organizing the new government. In the year 191 1 the total payments, exclusive of book-keeping items, made by Uncle Sam, were $964,000,000. This $964,000,000 contained $56,- 500,000 of payments on the account of the public debt, leaving for all other purposes the sum of $907,500,000. In 1912 the aggregate was $965,- 000,000, less $51,000,000 for debt charges, or $914,000,000 for all other purposes. The figures 25 26 Government Finance include the cost of the post-ofifice and payments for the Panama Canal. Without the post-office revenues and such as are incidental to public services, the Federal Government is raising by compulsory taxes, the true measure of the bur- den on the people, between $650,000,000 and $700,000,000 annually. There are, of course, a great many more peo- ple in the country now for whom these expend- itures are made, than there were in 1810. Re- duced to a per capita basis, the figures are: for 1810, $1.17, and for 191 1, $10.48. For 1914 they will not be far different. This comparison is very striking; one might say almost startling. We may not, however, jump at once to the con- clusion that the burden of supporting the Federal Government is nearly ten times as great for each man, woman, and child as it was a hundred years ago. In the first place, the purchasing power of money has decreased and a dollar does not mean as much in goods or in wages as it used to mean. In the second place, we are better off today and can afford to spend more. It would be interest- ing, if it were possible, to readjust these figures — $1.17 and $10.48 per capita — so as to make a comparison that would be more valid. But that cannot be done at all accurately, because the necessary data for 1810 are not available. It is not, however, a very rash guess to say that a dollar today will buy less than half as much as a dollar would in 1810, so the increase is certainly not more than five-fold, and may be much less. Our Federal Finances 2^ We know that in recent years the expenditures have increased faster than wealth, both in the aggregate and per capita. But again, the data available as to the amount of wealth in 1810 are not sufficiently accurate to enable us to revise the figures for purposes of a precise comparison. The fact, however, is very clear that federal expenditures are growing faster than population, and faster than wealth. The same is true to a far greater degree of state and local expenditures as we shall see later. Furthermore, this phe- nomenon of growing public expense is not pe- culiar to our own country, it is observed in all progressive countries. Whether this growth in government expend- itures is justifiable depends, as Professor Bullock has pointed out,* not on whether we can afford the money, but on whether it is well spent. As long ago as 1776, the people of Pennsylvania laid down in their constitution the correct principle, that " the purpose for which any tax is to be raised ought to appear clearly to the legislature to be of more service to the community than the money would be, if not collected." President Garfield stated another correct theory when he held that " while the total sum of money ex- pended from year to year must necessarily be greater, the amount per capita ought, in all well- regulated governments, in time of peace, to grow gradually less." This latter, however, is subject * Pol. Sci. Qiiar. xvni, p. no. 28 Government Finance to a modification, which might read " provided, the government has not extended its activities in some new directions and extended them wisely." In view of this, we are interested to see what all the money is spent for. For this purpose we may study the expenses of 191 1 and 1912. Es- pecially do we choose 191 1 because both the re- ceipts and expenditures for that year have been subjected to intensive study by President Taft's Commission on Economy and Efficiency, and by Professor E. V. Robinson for the Minnesota Tax Commission (see Report of 1912), and the ac- counts have been rearranged in several different ways, bringing out facts not easily available for other years. The conditions in these years were, also, more normal and typical than those since the financial depression and the outbreak of the great war. The figures presented have been roughly rounded out to the nearest million or quarter of a million, as being easier to remember, but the de- tails if desired are available in the reports re- ferred to. A private business concern divides its expenses into wages, cost of materials, cost of equipment, rent, interest, debt payments, and other such com- monplace classes. The President's Commission on Economy and Efficiency made an analysis of the "allotments" for 1912 in somewhat the same way. From that we find that out of a total of $1,- 000,000,000 and a little over. Uncle Sam spends $381,000,000 for the salaries and wages of his Our Federal Finances 29 regular officers and employees — the reader will note that this is thirty-eight per cent of the whole, and as *^he total happens to one thousand million, all the following figures can be turned into per- centages by merely pointing ofif — but he also hires a good many outside people and companies to work for him on contracts or otherwise, fur- nishing services of many kinds, like transporta- tion, heat, light, repairs, construction, printing, advertising and so on, and this eats up $141,- 000,000. Then his supplies, equipment, and other materials cost him about $118,000,000. Rent, in- terest, and permanent grants, such as the $2,- 500,000 for agricultural colleges, cost him $35,- 500,000. New land, new buildings, and other improvements cost him $27,400,000 in 19 12, and usually cost about the same amount. It takes about $77,000,000 to pay back his debts as they fall due and to refund money entrusted to him for various purposes. Then he pays about $160,- 000,000 in j)ensions of all sorts. In 1912, the Panama Canal, other canals, irrigation works, and the like cost about $57,000,000. But this item will change. Then at the end of the list, he sets down $5,000,000 for losses and contin- gencies. For all this money what do the people get? First, we may set down the services of the gov- ernment in its general branches — the legislative and executive departments. Congress costs about $7,000,000 a year, just by itself. If you wish to add to that the cost of congressional com- 30 Government Finance missions, the cost of public printing, the con- gressional library, and some other like items, the total swells to over $13,500,000. But as much of the printing done at the Public Printing Office, amounting in all to $5,500,000, is done for other officers and departments, and the library is much used by others than congressmen, it is, perhaps, proper to " knock off " about $3,500,000, and say that congress costs about $10,000,000. This, standing alone, looks like a large sum, although it is only one per cent of the whole cost of the government. But it must be remembered that we follow the democratic theory of paying the mem- bers of Congress and the Senate for their serv- ices, and repay their traveling expenses, and that we let them have all necessary clerical help. As these expenses are much in the public eye and are the frequent subject of debate between the majority and the minority in Congress itself, we may, perhaps, assume that they are justifiable and are not far away from what is reasonable for our form of government. It is less than $19,000 per member, each year. The President and his immediate office force cost about $200,000. This is certainly very mod- est, and compared with the amounts paid for crowned heads by European countries looks nig- gardly. Great Britain spends about $3,000,000 for the support of the " crown." But differences in ideals and duties vitiate the comparison. The President is aided in his work by the Civil Serv- ice Commission, which costs $270,000, and from Our Federal Finances 31 time to time by special commissions. In 191 1, these cost $250,000, but they are not necessarily permanent. It has been traditional to state the rest of the expenditures by departments corresponding to the various cabinet officers. But this does not lead to clearness, because the apportionment of duties among the departments is somewhat haphazard and arbitrary, and because it throws together things we would like to look at separately. There are, however, three executive departments which we might consider separately as such. The first is the Treasury Department, which for purely central and supervisory work costs about $24,- 000,000. That is, two and four-tenths per cent of all our expenses are for collecting taxes and other revenues, and taking care of the money. About $15,000,000 of this is for collecting revenues alone. The rest goes for keeping accounts, audit and control, and for supervising the officers in charge of the mint, of all money issues, of the national banks, of public health, of life-saving, and of other activities given separately below. The second is the Interior Department, which stripped of its special bureaus, whose activities we want to study separately, costs about $3,- 800,000. This is the " overhead charge " for supervising a multitude of important activities, including the Land Office, Office of Indian Af- fairs, Bureau of Pensions, Patent Office, Bureau of Education, Geological Survey, Reclamation Service, and Bureau of Mines. The third is Pub- 32 Government Finance lie Buildings, technically under the Treasury De- partment. With $16,250,000 worth of new build- ings going up, and with the supervision of this work, together with the care of other buildings, this office costs $20,800,000. The total of all these overhead expenses, omit- ting $16,250,000 for new buildings and including Congress and the executive departments, is $43,000,000. Leaving now the old departmental arrange- ment, let us make a group of certain activities which we may call those relating to the " protec- tion of life and property." The largest of these is a sub-group relating to the " preservation of peace and order," including national defense and the courts. The army cost, in 191 1, about $119,- 000,000, the navy, $117,400,000, and foreign af- fairs, $2,400,000 ; a total of nearly $239,000,000. This is nearly a quarter of all our expenses. It is a steadily growing cost. As far back as 1789, Adam Smith observed that defense " grows more and more expensive as society advances in civili- zation." Statistics of public expenditures for de- fense the world over show that this statement is as true today as when it was first written. But these are not the only items of expense attributable to war, i. e., to wars past and to the desire to prevent war, or to be ready for wars to come. In 191 1, and still today, there were two other items traceable mainly to the same general cause. These were for pensions and the care of old soldiers, a total of $163,100,000 and for debt Our Federal Finances 33 charges, $56,500,000. The total is the staggering sum of $459,000,000, or not much short of half of all federal expenses. Broadly speaking, we are paying $5.00 for each man, woman and child, each year, for the cost of war in times of peace. The History of the Cost of War We may digress for a moment and look back over the history of the cost of wars in this coun- try. The Revolutionary War left us with a debt of approximately $80,000,000, which was but a small part of the cost of that significant struggle. In 1800, the army was costing $2,500,000 an- nually, the navy $3,500,000, and interest on the debt, mainly a result of war, $3,400,000. This is in all $9,400,000 for war out of a total of only $10,800,000. It left but little for other purposes, and kept the government poor. Nothing but the proceeds from the sale of public lands, which be- gan to come in soon after this, saved the Federal Government. The War of 1812 occasioned a new debt of some $80,000,000, besides leading to heavy taxes. It also laid the foundation of the soldiers' pen- sion system, which began in 1818. By 1820, out of $18,300,000 expended for all purposes, $15,- 400,000 or $1.60 per capita went for war charges. This was a heavy burden in that day and genera- tion. Again, the Mexican War created a debt of nearly $50,000,000 with accom])anying other costs. So that by 1850, although the military 34 Government Finance charges had dropped from $35,800,000 in 1847, to $9,600,000, yet the aggregate annual war charges, exclusive of the expenses of looking after the Indians, were $19,500,000. However, this was the lightest war burden we have ever borne, because, with the growth of population, it was only eighty- four cents per capita. It has been estimated that the Civil War cost the Federal Government $6,190,000,000 all told, exclusive of pensions, since 1880. By 1870, the annual cost to the Federal Government alone of wars past and preparedness for war was no less than $233,500,000. This was the heaviest burden we have borne, amounting to $6.00 per head. It then fell steadily until the Spanish War, which, including the campaign in China and the restora- tion of peace in the Philippines, raised the annual expenditures for the army and navy alone from an average of $82,000,000 per annum (based on the four years 1894-97) to an average of $210,- 000,000 (based on 1898-1901). It also increased the soldiers' pensions and, although to a rela- tively small extent, added to the debt charges. We have had " a hard row to hoe " in becoming an independent and consolidated nation. Returning from our digression to the present- day costs of the Federal Government, our next item is $9,500,000 for the Department of Justice and the courts. Thus all together, keeping the peace and settling disputes, costs the Federal Government about $248,300,000 annually. Our Federal Finances 35 We come now to three sets of activities, most of which are either new, or comparatively recent expansions of old, activities. These are :(i) the public health, (2) the provisions for public safety, (3) the regulation of industry, commerce, and the like. The first costs $5,600,000, the sec- ond $8,000,000, the third, $4,500,000, together, $18,100,000. Under the first are looking after health and sanitation and the inspection of foods and drugs — the latter alone costing over $3,- 700,000. These two are growing expenditures and mark a new idea as to government respon- sibilities and duties. It seems probable that these activities will increase in importance and cost. Steamboat inspection and the light-house and life-saving provisions in the second group are older than any others in these three groups and have probably reached their full growth, at least in proportion to population. But those among the third, namely the Immigration Service, the Bureau of Labor, the Bureau of Corporations, and the Interstate Commerce Commission, are growing rapidly. One activity only, namely the supervi- sion of national banks, here included, has reached its full growth, that is in proportion to popula- tion. But here comes the Federal Reserve Bank System with new costs. Like the supervision of health and foods, these activities seem very likely to expand and to cost more each year. But after all, $18,000,000 for health, safety, and earnings is not large against $250,000,000 for national de- fense. 36 Government Finance Public works, including, besides the " rivers and harbors" — that perennial subject for con- gressional strife, which cost, in 191 1, at low ebb, about $8,500,000 — irrigation works, inland canals, and other items, but excluding the Pan- ama Canal ($37,000,000 in 191 1), cost $18,- 500,000. Direct aids to industry through the agricultural and fishery services, the patent of- fice and the like, and trade promotion by the consular service and other agencies, cost $11,- 000,000. On scientific research and publication the Federal Government spends $12,250,000, on education only $5,700,000, on parks $355,000. Our wards, the Indians, cost $6,500,000. Alto- gether, the activities above listed cost about $1 16,- 600,000, including the Panama Canal, or $79,- 600,000 without the canal. Less than eighty- seven cents per capita for promoting efficiency is not large against $5.00 for war. We have included in our grand total the cost of the post-office, which runs to nearly $240,- 000,000. There is a sense in which this is not a cost or burden of the government. It is not paid for by taxes or other compulsory revenues. The users get a direct return, worth more to them than the cost, and the income approximately equals the expenses. But it is inextricably interwoven with all government activities, causes Congress and the executive offices work, and is operated on broad lines, looking to the public welfare in general and not to money profits ; that is, it is treated as an essential public service. On a par Our Federal Finances 37 with this is the postal savings bank which so far costs but little — $57,000. Other public services of importance are the forestry service, costing $5,500,000, the adminis- tration of the public lands, $4,000,000, the issu- ance of money, $4,600,000. This shows $9,500,000 for forestry and public lands, which is little enough, but stands out in startling contrast with only $4,500,000 for indus- try, commerce, and labor. We spend more than twice as much on inanimate nature as we do on live men. The territories and the District of Columbia cost $11,500,000, about three-fourths of which is: offset by receipts of local revenues. Included in the grand total are also some $33,000,000 of technical, or bookkeeping expenditures, repre- senting the return of trust funds and the like which are also offset by receipts, not taxes. Finally comes the interest on the public debt, $21,300,000 and debt payment, $35,200,000, a total of $56,600,000. There are three questions as to federal financial policy and tendencies which are interesting. The first is the scope of federal activities ; the second, the efficiency and economy of service ; the third, how the equation between receipts and expenses is attained. The Scope of Federal Activities The Constitution and the logic of federal gov- ernment, in general, necessitate that the exec- 38 Government Finance utive, legislative, and judicial departments shall be maintained, and place all matters relating to foreign affairs and war, except internal dissen- sions within a state, in the hands of the Federal Government. For similar reasons, coinage and money, the post-office, the light-house service, patents and copyrights, the census, and at least the prevention of interference by the states with the freedom of interstate commerce are essen- tially federal functions. As vast tracts of land were donated to the United States, the land office is also essential. Every other function now exercised by the Federal Government is an invasion of the sphere of action originally reserved for the states. This invasion rests technically on the right to regulate interstate affairs, and requires in every case a straining of the meaning of the Constitution. There is, however, today, very little tendency to reassert the doctrine of state rights or to resent this expansion of federal activities. The sole question is, Which can do these things best, the separate commonwealths or the Federal Govern- ment, or a combination of both in cooperation? The judgment, in general, is that the Federal Government does them best. Most of the states, especially those once most wedded to the doc- trine of state rights seem content to sit back and let the Federal Government do all it can and will. Some few of the most advanced and best gov- erned states, not content with what the Federal Government is doing in these lines, duplicate Our Federal Finances 39 these activities or carry them farther than the Federal Government goes. When this happens, there are some clashes of jurisdiction, as in the matter of rate fixing for railroad fares and freights, and some duplication of expense. More often there is an effort to divide the field of the work, and occasionally direct cooperation. Among the most important activities thus dupli- cated may be mentioned : health and sanitation ; food and drug inspection ; immigration service ; labor bureaus ; control of corporations ; com- merce, especially the railroad commissions ; every line of public work, including irrigation and drainage, highways, inland canals, rivers and harbors ; the fishery service ; agriculture ; trade promotion; weights and measures; reHef of vet- erans ; and forestry. A certain amount of duplication between the national and state governments is unavoidable for two reasons. The first is the constitutional inhibition, which prevents the states from inter- fering with each other's affairs, and hence the necessity for some central authority to care for such matters as overlap. The second is the prac- tical one of funds. As the benefits are often local, the Federal Government does not seem jus- tified in doing it all. Where a clear line, mark- ing off internal state interests from interstate, can be drawn, internal interests are left to the states. But there is a decided need for more cooperation in avoiding duplication of expense and effort. Aside from the post-office, the Federal Gov- 40 Government Finance ernment conducts no public industry. Possibly the Panama Canal may be regarded as such, but it is hardly an invasion of the sphere of private industry. Someone may wish to add the Federal Reserve Banks to the list. Others may add the offering of marine insurance against war risks. If so, I should raise no serious objection. Every little while, however, some project for federal industries is raised. Notable is the recent pro- posal of the Postmaster General to acquire the telegraph system, and again the ship purchase bill considered by Congress in 1915. It is more than doubtful whether either of these activities will become a permanent part of the business of the Federal Government, but if they do they may lead rapidly to other extensions. Efficiency and Economy The questions of efficiency and economy being in the main common to all branches of govern- ment — federal, state, and local — we may defer the main discussion of this matter to another chapter. So far as particular questions relating solely to the efficiency and economy of the Fed- eral Government arise, they arise from the his- torical development of the different functions and offices, which has resulted in a somewhat haphazard and arbitrary grouping. Some de- partments embrace services very diverse in char- acter, making control and supervision difficult. Some bureaus are maintained separately, whose Our Federal Finances 41 duties and work could be transferred entirely to other bureaus, or they could be combined with other bureaus. Many local offices are continued, the need for which has largely passed away. The chief difficulty of effecting these changes is the question of patronage, but the natural inertia of government and the impossibility of establishing a permanent policy, when there are frequent changes in the administration, add to the diffi- culty. The Equation of Receipts and Expenditures As a general principle, governments decide first what they have to spend and then adjust their revenues thereto. There have been times in the history of this country when this policy has been followed by the Federal Government. This is regularly the case in time of war. Otherwise, it has been the case only in the so-called free trade periods, or at rare intervals, when the tra- ditional ex})enditures have exceeded the revenues. The trouble has been that a large part of the revenues have been fixed by the prevailing policy as to the tariff. That policy, once fixed, deter- mines a large part of the revenues for a period of years. In like manner, the internal revenue taxes, especially the indirect taxes on tobacco, beer, and spirits, are changed only at considerable intervals. Both of these sources of revenue are of such a character that their yield cannot be accurately forecast. Until the income tax was es- tablished, there had been no " elastic " element 42 Government Finance in the tax system, and so great apparently is the reluctance to develop that tax, that, even since its installation, new needs have been met by nev^^ taxes rather than by an adjustment of its rates. The result of this has been that, at times, the Federal Government has, to too large an extent, adjusted its spending to its revenues, and conse- quently there have been years of extravagance and waste. Unfortunately, in government finance, waste is not easily stopped when lean years come. Pensions granted directly by Con- gress under the old rule of "you help me and I'll help you" run on long after the pension sys- tem has been reduced to the comparatively ex- cellent order in which it is today. The way to a remedy of these conditions by affording Congress a better means of scrutinizing expenditures is opened by the so-called budget system, which will be considered in another place. Federal Debt The debt of the Federal Government is com- paratively small. The interest-bearing debt is less than $1,000,000,000, that is, less than one year's expenses. On top of that, we owe $375r 000,000, surreptitiously borrowed from the peo- ple without interest in the guise of circulating notes, which there is, unfortunately, no disposi- tion at present to repay. If we deduct cash on hand, however, we have a net debt but a little over the $1,000,000,000 above given; $720,- Our Federal Finances 43 000,000 of this bears interest at only two per cent, at which rate it is, perhaps, better to let the debt stand than to take the money away from the people by taxes in order to pay it. This serves, moreover, as the basis for our national banking system. Disregarding the paper money, deducting cash on hand and regarding the two per cent bonds as burdenless because of the serv- ices they perform, we might say, without great impropriety, that Uncle Sam is very nearly out of debt. At all events the debt constitutes a burden scarcely felt. Nevertheless, the interest charge is $22,900,000, a sum worth considering. Comparison with other countries as to debts should be made against population and public revenues. Accurate comparisons are not possible because of difference in the forms and functions of governments. One federal government or union of states may be very compact, the subor- dinate states having little to do, while another may be loose, all real activity vesting in the states. In the latter case the debts may be state debts, not federal. A country which owns and operates its railroads and other industries is likely to owe more than one which does not, and it can carry the debt more easily. In some countries, like our own, the burden of debt is local. To unravel the intricacies, and to obtain figures which would be strictly comparable, is a task so enormous that no one has ever under- taken it. Accounts also differ from country to country. The following table is therefore nec- essarily rough : 44 Government Finance O K bo O be CS bO O O 2 !3 •O ^ t: •c •O -rj 1 «J S G (U 3 'o 'o "o "b o o o o *-t-l M-t M-t M-) M-l *+-t MH M-t H < '^ « (TJ 0\ 1-1 I-; ro t^ 00 q ro ^ oi -"t -^ oi r^ ►-; ^ O O O O Q O O O O O O O O Q o o o o_^ o__ q^ -i t^ On (N« m 00 -1 O (^ O 1-1 C< < " " (N 1-1 C>4 >-. c« 8 9 O O O O O O O O Q Q O O O O O O^ O O *f ^f t^ o d CO in o " o t^ O ro fO q o o q_ . 1- rr lO X3 ,« lO Os u=i On OO 00 r-^ 6 r^ lo t^ t^ 0) 0) t^ w of r<0 uo OO CO NO i-T CO lo o 1-1 O t to 00 o t^ 0) On t^ 0) ir, rf o fO NO TT 0< w -rr CO "I 1 <<9- 1 t-i 1 rt »— ^c^ II, Our Federal Finances 45 This table should be used with great caution. Thus for example, the German debt and revenues include the money borrowed for and to be paid for by the state railroads. To that extent it is offset. The debt of the United Kingdom is heav- ier than appears for it was incurred for services to the whole empire and yet bears on the rev- enues of the British Islands only. England has very heavy local debts in addition to these shown, while France has very small local debts. The states of the German Empire perform functions which in England are performed by the Im- perial Government, in part, and in part by the colonies. The debt of Russia looms large in the aggregate, but compared with natural resources and territory is probably less burdensome than that of Japan. The debt of France is probably mostly held at home, while that of the other countries is scattered. A multitude of other considerations affect almost every comparison which might be attempted. A safe conclusion is that the debt of the United States is very light, and that of England and France very heavy indeed. At the same time the common idea that all European public debts are so enormous as to be utterly beyond re- payment is clearly in error. France, the worst case, could pay her debt in fifty years by adding only $3.00 per capita to her annual taxes. A fur- ther discussion of other public debts will be found in another chapter. CHAPTER V STATE AND LOCAL FINANCE, EXCLUSIVE OF MUNICIPAL VJ^ E now leave the field of federal finance and come to that of the finances of the states or commonwealths and of their traditional political sub-divisions. In New England, and in states re- ceiving their traditions from New England, these sub-divisions are the towns, with counties formed for certain very limited purposes. Generally the counties are only judicial districts. In the South the subdivisions are the counties. In other parts of the country we find a combination in various ways of counties and towns. Although the large cities perform the duties of those subdivisions of the state, the towns, or counties, with which they are in each state cor- related, yet they have also a large degree of home rule, which makes their financial problems some- what different from those of the states and their other subdivisions. We therefore reserve the cities for another chapter. In this chapter we shall examine the states' finances mainly, but we shall glance, also, at county and district problems. While the Federal Government has been stead- ily encroaching on the domain originally re- served for the states, the latter have not been 46 State and Local Finance 47 losing at all in importance and in costliness. They have greatly enlarged and developed those activities which were originally theirs, have found new things to do, and have assumed, in many parts of the country, activities which were originally local. I am personally of the opinion that there is more real growth in state activities than in those of any other part of our govern- ment. By that I mean that the things they are now taking over will prove in their ultimate ex- pansion more fundamentally important to the fu- ture development of the country than the recently assumed functions of any other branch of gov- ernment. The states' original activities, while not the same in any two states, and although differing very widely in some cases, embraced in most cases the following: the support of the legis- lature, the higher courts, the executive depart- ments, including the governor, the secretary of state, the financial officers, the attorney general, and the state militia. In 1796, the average ex- penditures of the fifteen states were less than $70,000 apiece, and the total about $1,000,000 for all fifteen. In 1902, the states and territories were spending $186,000,000. In 19 13 they were spending $383,000,000 — a phenomenal increase. What the counties and minor civil divisions, in- cluding cities other than those over 25,000 inhab- itants, were spending in 1796 we do not know, but in 1902 they were spending $502,000,000. As the cities over 25,000 spent $469,000,000 in 48 Government Finance addition, in 1902 the states' proportion was a little over sixteen per cent of all public money spent, exclusive of federal expenses. By 1912 the big cities were spending nearly $900,000,000 of revenues alone and much more of borrowed money. In 1913 the counties were spending $385,000,000 and incorporated places over 2,500 inhabitants $1,247,000,000. The census bureau lists the expenses for func- tions performed in 1902 as follows: legislature, chief executive offices, offices of secretary of state, law offices, finance offices, miscellaneous general government offices, courts, buildings and sites, military, police and inspection, health, con- servation, sewers and drainage, highways, char- ities, insane, penal institutions, education, includ- ing common schools and state institutions, parks and recreation, agriculture, interest, and state commercial industries. This is a formidable list, and yet since 1902, state expenditures have very greatly increased. The changes in the last decade have been along the following lines, but not, of course, the same in every state. Among the financial offices have come many new state tax commissions, which supervise the revenues, state boards of control taking over the supervision of expenditures, or even the management of state institutions which were formerly conducted by separate boards. Among the miscellaneous general offices have come the new railroad commissions, and the new public utility commissions which have risen into State and Local Finance 49 great importance. So also have the labor bureaus stepped up from relative obscurity. Industrial accident boards have developed, and bank super- vision has become more important and effective. The health office has become a live bureau where it was merely a quarantine office before. Other bureaus have arisen. State aid to education varies greatly. In some states the state raises the greater part of the support of the common schools and passes the money over to the school districts. In other cases the state does very little, leaving the com- mon schools primarily to the care of the local- ities. Nearly every state has, at least, a state school fund in a capital sum, the interest of which goes to the schools. The prevailing principle today seems to be that the state contributes an amount held to be sufficient to ensure a uniform minimum of school- ing for every child, but leaves a large part of the burden of making the schools better than the minimum to the school districts or local gov- ernments. It is held by good authorities on school finance that too little is done by the states and too much left to the districts. Until the states develop wider taxing powers than they now exercise this cannot well be changed. The states today sometimes aid the high schools. They did little for them before 1902. They very gen- erally provide normal schools. Many now sup- port state universities or at least agricultural colleges. The normal schools and the universi- 50 Government Finance ties receive today manyfold what they did in 1902. Among the recent developments have also been state highways, increased expenditure for health conservation, increased expenditures for char- ities, such as mothers' pensions, and correctional adjuncts to the penal system. In all states there has been a development of the old existing activities which, of itself, has trenched on the domain of the local govern- ments, but in many there has been a distinct tak- ing over of functions from the local govern- ments. In every state in the Union new state functions have arisen. In no case have local expenditures been much reduced. There may be exceptions, of course, but as a rule, when the states have relieved the local governments of any burden, the local gov- ernments have gone ahead and assumed new burdens. This results in a perpetual rolling up of state expenses and taxes, and of county and local expenses and taxes, the end of which is by no means in sight. Even with complete data of recent date as to the amounts of state and local expenses at hand, in the 1913 census reports the diversities of state governmental organization and of economic conditions render averages dan- gerously misleading and comparisons impossible. To attempt to cover the whole country as to state expenditures would be tedious, and would re- quire more space than we have at our disposal. State and Local Finance 51 But we may examine some few states which offer interesting data. Examples of State Finance There was a time when the salary of the Gov- ernor of Rhode Island was only $1,000 per annum, and the office was cheerfully bestowed upon any opulent New Yorker who would honor the state and himself by taking up a residence in his summer home at Newport. The salary of $1,000, with the honor and dignity of the office, more than adequately paid for the services re- quired of his Excellency, for all important gov- ernmental activities were performed in the towns. Today, that smallest of all states, once regarded as a mere federation of independent towns with little central organization, has developed a rela- tively large amount of commonwealth activities. State expenses have risen rapidly — most rapidly in the last two decades. In 1887 that state spent $850,000. In 1913, the expenses were $3,500,- 000. The importance of the state's activities has increased the governor's duties so that he now receives a salary of $3,000. Of the $3,500,000 spent in 19 13, many items seem to be invasions of the sphere of action formerly reserved for the towns. Thus while the towns and cities still carry the main cost of the schools, the state con- tributed about $200,000 for high schools, com- mon schools, and similar educational affairs. It also spent $290,000 for state roads, $240,000 for bridges, and $250,000 for normal schools and 52 Government Finance other forms of higher education. While the state's share of expenses has been growing, the expenses of the cities and towns have not de- cHned. Providence alone is spending $10,500,- 000, or three times what the state spends. In 1903, Providence spent $4,800,000. Crossing the continent, we come to California, which has an entirely different historical growth of state and local activities. Here the state al- ways came first, and the counties, road, and school districts, and cities, theoretically, merely carried out the orders of the state. Yet in Cali- fornia we find the state spending $27,780,000 (exclusive of highways being built by state bonds), and all other units of government $117,- 000,000 ; or, if we transfer the $6,000,000 which the state collects for schools and hands over to the districts to spend, the ratio is about $22,000,- 000 to $123,000,000. As California has four and one-half times the population of Rhode Island, the state's expenses as distinct from those of the counties and cities, are about double those of Rhode Island per capita. But the counties and cities have also a large amount of governmental work to do as is shown by the large expenditures. Thus by two different roads these two states are arriving at the same goal. Rhode Island by absorbing functions originally local, and Cali- fornia by enlarging and emphasizing state func- tions, both arrive at a very similar division of expenses between the state and the local govern- ment. State and Local Finance 53 Yet the difference in traditions as to the im- portance of the state government is exemplified by the salary of $10,000 paid the Governor of California, in addition to which his dignity is recognized by a " mansion," with $10,000 for its upkeep, $5,000 for traveling expenses, an auto- mobile and chauffeur, all from the state's treasury. As California has adopted very many of the new " progressive " things in state government, it will be interesting to see how much they cost. The figures which follow are all for the years 1904 and 1914. In every case the smaller amount is for 1904. In some respects the increases are not as important as they appear, because, of course, the state has grown in population and in wealth. Then, too, the general level of prices and wages has gone up. Hence a seventy-five per cent increase might be considered inevitable. The cost of the judicial, executive, and admin- istrative departments increased from $783,000 to $1,231,000. Most of this is the result of more work falling on these departments in conse- quence of the increase in other state activities. There are new courts, and the "board of con- trol " which took the place of the old board of examiners costs $185,000 (less transfers from other fields, $32,000), against $20,000 for the old board. " Regulative " activities increased in cost from $86,000 to $1,143,000. These are largely new. The old railroad commission cost $20,000, the 54 Goz'crnnient Finance new one costs $306,000 and is asking for $200,- 000 more next year for new duties which were imposed on it by popular vote. A member of the old commission said his office meant " $4,000 a year and not a thing to do." The new commission has no sinecure. It actually regulates all public utility rates and the issuance of securities by utility companies. Its work is very highly es- teemed. Regulating banks now costs $94,000 against $24,000. The board of health costs $113,000. It used to cost $23,000, but it now enforces the pure food and drug law. The labor bureau used to cost $8,000, and now $50,000. Brand new, regulative commissions, or boards, costing $527,000 have been created. They are for " water control," " industrial accidents " (which costs $440,000, but of this $350,000 is the insurance fund which will sustain itself), " immi- gration and housing," " veterinary medical ex- aminer," and the " civil service commission." The largest increase came in the "constructive " group. Harbor improvements and highways cost $6,286,000 in 1914 against $912,000 in 1904. A large part of this is " outlay," or supposed to be an investment. Education receives an increase from $4,919,- 000 to $9,517,000 in the aggregate. Free text- books account for about $300,000 of this. Then, there are new normal schools and other schools costing $1,087,000. The rest of the increase is distributed between the elementary schools, the high schools and the university. The high State and Local Finance 55 schools have relatively the largest increase. Roughly speaking the increase for education along lines existing ten years ago is from $5,000,- 000 to $8,000,000. This is a low rate of increase if we allow seventy-five per cent for normal growth. Of course, these activities start from a larger base, they were already well grown ten years ago. It is not fair to contrast them with activities practically new, which start from noth- ing or almost nothing. But yet, as they too have many new things to do, they are really lagging behind seriously. The efifective relative growth is only about ten per cent in ten years. It is characteristic of popular government to love the youngest child best. Hence old established activ- ities have to look out for themselves, or often go uncared for. " Developmental " activities, including agricul- tural societies, the fish commission, and a recla- mation board, increased in cost from $151,000 to $623,000. "Curative" work, mostly the care of the in- sane, costs $2,393,000 against $1,041,000. Reformatories grew in cost from $171,000 to $376,000. Prisons grew from $584,000 to $1,113,000. The Militia required $574,000 in 1914, it had only $155,000 in 1904. Benevolence, on the support of orphans and half -orphans, shows an actual decrease from $500,000 to $400,000. This decrease and, what is more startling, this failure to increase, together 56 Government Finance mark two important changes. . First, " graft " has been eHminated ; second, the whole activity has ceased to be a " charity " and has become " curative." This expense includes " mothers' pensions," since 1913. The total of all the above items increased from $9,500,000 to $24,000,000. As stated above, the same tendencies are to be found all over the United States. It is only a matter of degree in different states. In the first period of the coming development, the greatest increase in cost will be for the " regu- lative," " constructive," and " development " activities. Educational and benevolent activities will practically stand still, unless their represent- atives exert themselves more than they are now doing. " Curative," " correctional," and " penal " activities are also hampered because relatively older than the " regulative." With many important differences in detail, the same general trend is to be found well exempli- fied in Wisconsin. Since all these new activities "make good," there is little doubt that they will spread from state to state. Kentucky affords an example of still another variety of state government. With compara- tively little expansion of state activities proper, which are as near the minimum as possible, the financial weakness of the counties has forced the state to take up more and more of local ex- penses. Some of the counties are known locally State and Local Finance 57 as " pauper counties " because they receive so much more toward local expenses than they pay to the state. The state pays a large part of the support of the assessors, county clerks and sheriffs, local courts, local attorneys, and of the costs of criminal prosecutions, and also a very large part of the support of schools. Minnesota is interesting as affording an exam- ple of a state in which there is a decidedly close interrelation between state and local finance. The state paid out in 191 1, $16,600,000, the coun- ties $41,800,000, the local governments $47,500,- 000, a total of nearly $106,000,000. But these payments include duplications. Stripped down to net cost payments, the figures are: state, $11,- 000,000 ; counties, $9,300,000 ; local, $46,700,000 ; a total of $67,000,000.* The large difference between one hundred and six millions gross payments and sixty-seven mil- h'ons net, illustrates the difficulty inherent in all these figures. In Minnesota nearly half of the state's revenues go for educational purposes, including the university, $2,740,000 (1912), pub- lic schools $1,550,000, normal schools $455,000. In 19 12 the state spent on its main disburse- * Professor Robinson, whose figures these are, arrives at the further conclusion that the actual taxes paid, at the tax rates of 191 1, by a family of five owning $4,000 of property, were: $4.59 for state government, $6.08 for county, $24.41 for local governments ; but as a large part of the $24.41 is paid only by residents of cities, we may not add these averages together to form a total. This is an interesting example of the intricacy of tax statistics. 58 Government Finance ments from revenue $10,734,000. In 1902 the state spent for the same class of things only $3,734,000. That is, $7,000,000 more in ten years. Population increased about one-fifth, state expenses, nearly three-fold. But the inter- esting thing is the expansion of new duties. The list is very instructive: a tax commission, high- way commission, bureau of immigration, fire marshal, superintendent of banks, live stock sani- tary board, oil inspection, sanitorium for con- sumptives, hospital for crippled and deformed children, industrial school for girls, war pensions, art society, board of visitors to state institutions, hospital for inebriates, weights and measures department, and hotel inspector. There were also a new capitol and additions to the university. Minnesota has an unusually well-ordered finan- cial system throughout, and the revenues are well managed. It is, hence, all the more interesting to note that the Minnesota people are not con- tent to have one of the best financial systems in the country. They want to make it still better. A large commission on " efficiency and economy," appointed by the Governor, has just rendered a report urging further improvement. Massachusetts is a state where the traditions place the chief burdens of government on the local units, the towns and cities. The auditor's estimate for 1914 called for only $17,750,000 of state funds. Of this, $5,600,000 was for charita- ble purposes, and only $1,750,000 for educational purposes. As Boston alone spent $58,000,000 in State and Local Finance 59 1912, Worcester $8,500,000, Fall River $4,500,- 000, Lowell $4,200,000, New Bedford $7,000,000, Springfield $5,000,000, and Lynn $4,500,000, the state's expenses seem small by comparison. Yet the state directs some important local activities, like the great metropolitan water works and parks and sewer systems, which are listed, not as state, but as local activities. New York, also, throws the burden of govern- ment mainly on the local units. The state's ex- penses were about $52,000,000 in 1913; but the local governments raised in revenues alone, with- out including borrowed money, nearly $300,000,- 000. In his 1912 report the Controller makes some interesting comments on the growth of state expenses. He calls attention to the fact that the revenues were $36,600,000 in 1910, and $52,400,000 in 19 1 3. The amount expended for the advancement of agriculture had grown in ten years to $2,000,000 on 180 per cent, al- though population had grown only twenty-five per cent. The state's offerings for education, exclusive of the fund for the support of the com- mon schools, which was $5,000,000, amounted to $4,000,000, an increase of 400 per cent in ten years. State hospitals and related institutions received $7,350,000 in 1912, an increase of fifty per cent in ten years ; charities received $3,000,- 000, an increase of sixty per cent, and public works $4,500,000, an increase of 470 per cent. This array of percentages is formidable. But $2,000,000 for agriculture in a state of 10,000,- 6o Government Finance ooo people is only twenty cents apiece, and the other items are not yet \a.rgt compared with what any one of the progressive states are doing. New York contributes from state funds $9,000,000 to education out of $52,000,000 spent by the state for all purposes or seventeen per cent, while Minnesota contributes from state funds $8,000,000 out of $16,600,000, or nearly half. Illinois, like New York, is backward and pro- vincial, and affords us an example of a state whose fiscal system is very old-fashioned. With the exception noted below, the states activities are limited to the bare maintainance of the framework of a government. The " Fairlie " Tax Commission of 1910 said of it : " The pres- ent situation has developed in a desultory way, with little effort at any correlated system." The auditor's reports show a total of state ex- penditures of $26,000,000 for the two years end- ing September 30, 1912, or an average of $13,- 000,000 yearly. This includes a contribution of a million and a half annually to the local schools, and two million and a quarter for other educa- tional purposes. Not quite as much goes for charities. The total includes about $850,000 an- nually for local bonds. Data on all local ex- penses are not available. The total of all taxes, state, county, and city, exclusive of special assess- ments, which often become very nearly true taxes, is reported as $96,000,000 in 191 1. But as this is exclusive of non-tax revenues it is below the total expenditures. The tax revenues of the State and Local Finance 6i state are only eight and six-tenths per cent of the total taxes levied. The burden of govern- ment falls on the counties and school districts. Small as these expenditures seem for a great state with nearly 6,000,000 people, they show signs of growth. The general state tax levy was raised in 191 1 from $5,100,000 to $7,750,000, and the state's contribution to schools, which is in addition to this, was increased from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000. The increases seem to be dis- tributed over all departments. These illustrations, scanty as they are, show very clearly the diversities of governmental or- ganization in the various states. They show, also, that comparisons are very difficult to make. The figures given in the published reports are not easy to interpret. One thing, however, is clear. State expenses are everywhere growing, perhaps not more rapidly than local expenses, but growing in direc- tions which will call for larger expenses still. There are everywhere three lines of increase: ( I ) The state governments are doing on an ever increasing scale those things which they did be- fore ; (2) State governments are developing func- tions, mostly " regulative " and " developmental," which no branch of government exercised be- fore; (3) State governments are taking over from the local governments in whole or in part duties which used to be regarded as local. Rut the saving to the local governments is more than absorbed by their increases in activities. 62 Government Finance The great items of local expenditures, leav- ing out cities of over 8,000 inhabitants, are for schools, highways, and charities. School control by districts has been condemned as " expensive, shortsighted, inefficient, inconsistent, and un- progressive ; it leads to great and unnecessary inequalities in schools, terms, educational advan- tages, and to an unwise multiplication of schools ; the trustees, because they hold the purse strings, frequently assume authority over matters which they are not competent to handle ; and most of the progress in rural school improvement has been made without the support and often against the opposition of the trustees and the people they represent." * The remedy proposed is a larger supervisory and taxing district, " preferably the county." In so far as it is urged that more money is needed, and that "it cannot well cause an in- crease in district taxation," the argument is faulty. If the districts cannot afford to pay more per se, how can the difficulty be removed by merely combining districts? In so far, how- ever, as a larger unit may reduce duplications and increase efficiency, the argument is cogent. It means having more money by eliminating waste. The school men have not discovered the proper remedy, which is given in the last chapter of this book. * Professors Cubberly and Elliott, School and Society, Jan, 30, 1915. State and Local Finance 63 Road district, or township control of highways is even more open to criticism than school dis- trict control of schools. All the adjectives of opprobrium hurled at the school districts by the critics just quoted, may be repeated as to road districts. Here the remedy is being applied. The state is stepping in to build the roads, but the problem of paying for them is still far from being permanently solved. It appears, however, that the present solution is to charge the expense the state incurs back to the property or to local units benefited. The town poorhouse, or even the county poor farm, has seldom been a credit to our civilization. State aid for the poor and aged, handed down to the local authorities to spend, has not wrought much improvement. State boards of charities have too often been perfunctory. But the pres- ent trend is toward effective state control, which may work an improvement. With this the state assumes a larger share of expense and further strains its resources. Prisons, reformatories, asylums for the insane and defectives, schools for the deaf and blind, have generally been state affairs. But local jails are mostly bad and badly managed. Cities are moving to improve these, but county and rural jails are almost uniformly unsanitary and ex- travagantly managed. Sooner or later central control will be demanded here, again an increase in state expense. All along the line we find that the future prom- 64 Government Finance ises to enlarge still further the sphere of the state. But there is also little hope that the bur- den of local taxation will correspondingly de- crease. The counties and towns too will be called on for larger activities. Another development is also in sight. Central control of local taxation is coming. It has proved its usefulness wherever it has been tried. It will eventually be the rule. But central con- trol of taxation, without some control of spend- ing, is only half effective. It is not enough to make sure that taxes are properly apportioned ; the burden may nevertheless be unbearable. Control of local expenditures, at least to the extent of eliminating duplication and waste, is the second half. As the state begins to share in what have been local activities and expenses, it will begin to assert a right to have a voice in the local work along the lines into which it enters. But although we may look forward to greater economy, we must not lose sight of the fact that needs are growing and multiplying. More and evermore money will be needed. The general property tax is in many places strained to the breaking point. New sources must be found. The only effective source in the long run will be income taxes. Through them alone can the " unseen benefits," the savings made to the peo- ple by the new governmental activities, be made to help pay for the costs of those activities. This may be illustrated by a single example before we close this chapter. The regulation of State and Local Finance 65 railroad rates, if as effective as it is claimed to be, adds much to personal efficiency, little to property values. It cuts down railro,ad property values and taxes as much as it raises private property values and taxes. The property tax will never reach the new tax paying ability result- ing from this activity. The income tax can reach it. In conclusion we may restate the opinion that the greatest growth in government expenditures is coming in the field of state finance. CHAPTER VI MUNICIPAL EXPENDITURES ' I 'HE federal and the commonwealth govern- ments may be said to take care of the fields and gardens of the public estate and the cities may be said to do the housekeeping. There is a troublesome lack of uniformity among the larger cities of the United States as to the functions which they perform and con- sequently as to the lines of their expenditures. Their total expenditures (in 1912) range from $9.48 per head in Johnstown, Pa., purged by the flood, to $83.67 in Omaha, Neb. But it should be said that Omaha spent $60.43 P^^ head for new water works, so the better comparison is $9.48 against $23.24. This lack of uniformity is due in part to the fundamental differences in the framework of local government. In some states local government is based on the township system, in others on the county system, and in still others on various combinations of the two. Another cause of diversity is the fact that each state legislature has devised its own way of framing the underlying law for city governments. Many diversities are temporary only, being due to new outlays for permanent improvements. While this diversity is sometimes troublesome 66 Municipal Expenditures 6y in any study of city finances, because it makes many comparisons which we would Hke to insti- tute impossible, yet there are also many more important similarities. There are many func- tions which are common to all cities and which are performed in much the same manner and to somewhat the same extent in all large cities. These are sufficiently important to permit us to pass briefly over the differences, a full discussion of which would take up too much space. An example of one group of differences is afforded by the judicial functions performed by the city as such. Some cities have very wide duties of this sort, while for others these powers vest largely, especially as to the higher courts, in the county within which the city is located. An- other set of differences is illustrated by the school systems. In some cases the schools and certain other activities are wholly under the direct control of the city government, while in many other cases there still exist within the cities separate school districts and other districts more or less independent of the municipal gov- ernments. Differences of the first type do not involve great differences of expense, and differ- ences of the second sort can be adjusted by com- bining the costs of the separate districts with those of the cities. It is necessary to draw the line somewhere between cities that can be considered full-fledged and those which resemble overgrown villages or towns. The line must be more or less arbitrarily 68 Government Finance drawn and has been drawn by the Census Bureau at a population of 30,000, or formerly at 25,000. We shall do the same in order to take advantage of the census figures. There were 195 such cities reported on for 19 12. For 146 of the 195 we have data more or less comparable for the years from 1902 to 1912 inclusive. The Census Bureau, whose data we shall fol- low in the main, divides the money paid out by cities into three great groups, (i) expenses, (2) interest, and (3) "outlays." The first two are self-explanatory, the last covers all expenditures or investments for " permanent properties and public improvements." The distinction between an " outlay " and an " expense " is occasionally as difficult in city finances as for any individual. While it is clear that a new street, a bridge, where there was none before, or a fine new city hall is an "outlay," yet a new pavement on an old street is an expense or an outlay according to whether we view it as a " repair " or an " im- provement." But the private citizen has the same trouble. It is always an open question whether the cost of a new automobile is an ex- pense of an investment. The distinction is not a hard and fast one. Too often the "outlay" account is swelled artificially for the purpose of making an unduly favorable showing in running expenses. Generally speaking, every expendi- ture of money raised by bonds is considered an outlay, but some current revenues also go into outlays for permanent properties. Municipal Expenditures 69 We shall consider first only expenses or cur- rent cost payments. City Expenses All cities provide in some way by current funds for the support of the following branches or functions: (i) general government; (2) police department; (3) fire department; (4) pro- tection to persons and property other than through the police and fire departments; (5) health department; (6) sanitation, or promotion of cleanliness; (7) streets and highways; (8) charities, hospitals, and corrections ; (9) schools ; (10) libraries, art galleries, and museums; (11) parks and recreation; (12) pensions and gratu- ities. Beyond these twelve there are many mis- cellaneous activities not common to many cities but of great and growing significance where they exist, such as the operation of public-service en- terprises. Since public-service enterprises present problems in finance different from the general run of departmental activities, they will be treated here separate and apart from all others. General Government Of the total of $508,500,000* spent in 1912 for running expenses by the 195 cities reported * The sum is about $3,r>oo,ooo greater if we include money spent by independent school (hstricts. This $3,600,000 is included in our analysis of school expenses but is omitted here. yo Government Finance on by the census in that year, $59,700,000 went for the general government. This included : ( i ) the council, or board of aldermen, which is the legislative branch; (2) the executive branch, whether a mayor, a commission (partly taking the legislative functions), or a manager, together with the financial departments of tax assessment and collection, auditing, and the treasurer, the city law department, and some others; (3) the judicial branch, consisting of the various courts, the coroner, marshal, or sheriff; (4) the cost of elections; (5) the care and rental of public build- ings for the general government. Of all these the judicial branch costs the most, or nearly $16,000,000, and if we add to this the legal department, that is, the city's attorney, the total for these allied objects becomes nearly $21,000,000. The financial department comes next with some $14,200,000. Then follows the executive and legislative with $10,500,000, public buildings $8,000,000, elections $6,000,000. These items bring out at once the character of the city in its two-fold capacity: (i) as a gov- ernmental agency, illustrated by the importance of the judicial department; (2) as a business undertaking, as evidenced by the importance of the financial and administrative departments. The business side, as we shall see, is advancing fastest. Hence arise the new movements in re- gard to the form of city government. The trend was from the old political mayor and board of aldermen to the " commission " form of city gov- Municipal Expenditures yi ernment and now, apparently, to the "business manager " or professional mayor. While it is not within our present purpose to inquire into the best form for the central or general government of a city, yet we must note in this connection what different kinds of work the general government has to do. First, there are the delegated political powers of government pure and simple. These include.: (i) some small matters of legislation which, as a rule, are not very important; (2) some very extensive powers of keeping order, preventing and punishing crime, and conserving public welfare. Second, there is a very large amount of public work rang- ing from the construction and maintenance of streets, bridges, and sewers to highly specialized public utilities such as street railways, light, heat, and power plants. Third, there is the school system. These are quite distinct lines of activities, and each requires a different kind of talent and train- ing in the officers in charge. The first is mainly political, the second, " business," the third, " pro- fessional." The hardest task in framing a city charter consists in so combining these elements as to afford for each adequate supervision in the general government. Protection to Person and Property The cost of this part of the municipalities' activities is second only to the cost of education. y2 Government Finance The total spent for this in 1912 was $117,000,- 000. Of this the poHce departments took $60,- 000,000, the fire departments $47,500,000, includ- ing water where that was a special charge against the fire department, and the remaining $9,500,- 000 went for militia and armories, the register of deeds and mortgages, the inspection of build- ings, plumbing, weights and measures, and the like, and for a lot of miscellaneous things of which the pound, the morgue, the police and fire alarm systems may serve as examples. There are two sides to the work of the police department ; on one side it is repressive, on the other regulative and constructive. A policeman arresting a pick-pocket illustrates one side ; an- other, directing traffic at a crowded corner, illus- trates the other. We are too apt to think of police work as wholly repressive and forget that it can be, and is becoming, more and more con- structive. In a very instructive table in his book Alore Money for the Public Schools, ex-President Eliot shows that where the most money is spent on schools there, generally speaking, the least is spent for the police. Money spent on suppress- ing and punishing crime is a sad expense at best, and if it can be saved by spending more in other directions there is a gain in social welfare too great to be measured by the difference in money saved or spent. The tendency of the American people to set up criminal penalties for all man- ner of infractions of rules, whether such infrac- Municipal Expenditures 73 tions are socially dangerous or not, and to mul- tiply the regulations, has enormously increased the cost of the repressive side of the police service. It has, moreover, brought the police service into grave danger of corruption by affording the officers an opportunity to overlook, for a bribe, an offense which public opinion, the law to the contrary notwithstanding, does not hold to be wrong. It is this latter tendency which has prevented a greater reduction in the relative cost of the repressive work of the police. Yet that side of the police work is relatively de- creasing. The growth of the constructive work of the police department is large and it is almost en- tirely wholesome. People living together in large masses need guidance. An army cannot be so highly trained as to march without officers, and while the crowd leaves the theater without guid- ance, yet when entering the theater ushers greatly facilitate finding the proper seats. Directing traffic, preventing accidents, caring for the in- jured, seeing that doors are properly secured, and through the police courts caring for children whether physically astray or morally awry, to- gether with a multitude of reformatory activities such as probation, truancy work, and the like, all illustrate what is meant by the constructive side of the police work. It permeates the repressive work as well. In much of this work the local courts aid the police. The annual fire waste in the United States is 74 . Government Finance a subject to which much attention has been directed, and its tremendous size has been pub- licly deplored. The figures are staggering. The annual property loss is $230,000,000, insurance against that costs $410,000,000 annually, and the large cities alone (those of over 30,000 inhab- itants), spend $45,000,000 more for fire depart- ments. If we make allowance for fire depart- ments in other cities, towns, and villages and the incidental expenses in other departments of city governments, such as special provision for fire by the water works, the total annual cost to the nation for fire waste and prevention runs up to over $750,000,000. A large part of this is due to cheap and faulty construction. There seem to be only two remedies yet discovered to prevent or lessen this waste. One is the enforcement of ordinances requiring, in congested districts, fire- proof construction only. The other is the co- insurance plan of premium rates instituted by the insurance companies, which makes it to the advantage of the owner to build as safely as possible. Fire loss is a preventable loss. But while human beings are careless, incompetent, and selfishly negligent, it will not be prevented wholly. So far as one can see, an efficient fire department is a necessary arm of the city gov- ernment. The conservation of health is costing the cities about $10,000,000, of which $4,500,000 goes to the general support of the health office, the same amount to the prevention of communicable dis- Municipal Expenditures 75 eases, and another million especially to the con- servation of child life. This is a rapidly growing expense, but one that is, probably, only in its infancy yet. The disease and death waste is far more serious than the fire waste, although not measurable in money. It is at least as preventable as is the fire waste. Yet we spend four and a half times as much of public funds on the fire department as on saving lives and preventing sickness. The explanation of this is, of course, to be found in the fact that health is a matter that has been traditionally left to pri- vate initiative to care for and only when epidemics raged or threatened has it been con- sidered of public or governmental concern. That constant watchfulness and cooperative medical supervision through municipal agencies can do this work best has been demonstrated. The public accounts of cities carry an annual charge of $41,500,000 for sanitation or the pro- motion of cleanliness. Of this $7,000,000 goes for the current expenses of the upkeep of sewers and the disposition of sewage, while $33,000,000 goes for collecting and disposing of garbage. The other $1,500,000 goes for public laundries, wash-houses, convenience stations, and other sanitary purposes. The aggregate expense for sewers might be regarded as misleading, because it is the almost universal practice to write off the original cost. The original cost of sewer con- struction is not known nor is the replacement value ascertainable, but it might perhaps be held 76 Government Finance that there should be added to the $7,000,000 a sum, probably very large, for interest on the investment in the sewer system. Some of the interest-bearing debt is the result of sewer con- struction. New sewers called for $32,000,000 in 1912. Highways The care and maintenance of streets, high- ways, and bridges, including their lighting, occa- sion an expense of $58,000,000, of which $22,- 000,000 is for lighting. These figures again make no allowance for interest on the investment which, it might possibly be contended, should be included. New highways cost $102,500,000 in 1912. In this connection passing mention may be made of the fact that some few cities have mu- nicipal plants of various sorts for their own serv- ices. These cost some $2,000,000 to run each year. This is usually a charge against the dif- ferent departments served. CJiarities Charities, hospitals, and corrections are among the oldest city functions, yet they are not among the most costly. Every town or county has its poor farm and the cities do like work. The total in 1912 was, however, only $33,250,000. This line of public work is supplemented largely by private charities and endowments and by state Municipal Expenditures yy and county agencies, so that the public work of the cities is very httle uniform and the signifi- cance of the figures is difficult to ascertain. Education As has already been stated, the public schools constitute the largest single object of city ex- penditures, the total being $147,000,000 by the cities as such. Adding to this the expenditures made by independent school districts identified with the cities, the total for current expenses is $150,600,000. This is merely for expense; in- terest, and outlays swell the total to $220,000,000. There are three ways of financing the city schools : ( I ) the entire support may be a burden on the city; (2) the state may collect the entire fund and apportion it to the cities, and other districts; (3) the state (and sometimes the county), may raise a general maintenance fund and apportion that, while the cities and districts supplement that with additional funds for main- tenance and for construction of buildings. The third, in a great variety of forms, is the most common method. The reason for a central state fund apportioned to the cities and districts is the desire to ensure a certain minimum uni- formity. It also places a part at least of the burden of the support of the schools in poor cities and districts on the shoulders of the richer cities and districts. Of the $150,600,000 spent, $22,000,000 came from the state funds and 78 Government Finance $4,000,000 from county funds. Nearly all the rest was raised by the cities themselves or within the cities through school districts. But the dif- ferences in practice are wide. New York City spends $34,700,000 for schools of which hardly $2,000,000 comes from the state, while in Newark, N. J., the state supplies about half. Of the $150,600,000 which the 195 cities spent for the running expenses of the public schools of all grades, $95,400,000 went for the salaries of teachers other than principals. To this should be added $13,800,000 for supervision of instruc- tion by principals and other officers. Thus $109,- 200,000 or seventy-three percent of the total goes to salaries for instruction. Supplies used directly in the work of instruction — such as books, maps, stationery, and the like — cost $9,000,000 more. This makes the full cost of instruction alone $118,200,000, which is eighty- four per cent of the whole. General administra- tion, janitors, fuel, repairs, and other miscel- laneous expenses make up the remainder. When we consider the size and number of the school buildings and the heavy wear and tear to which they are subject it seems that sixteen per cent is a very small operative charge, and a system which actually puts $84 out of every $100 of cur- rent expenses into the main object can not be regarded as badly managed. When we add to the running expenses the interest charges of some $12,000,000, and the outlays of about $42,000,000 we may not be as well pleased. Municipal Expenditures 79 School trustees serve for the most part without compensation. Thus a real cost is incurred which does not show in the accounts. Of the new features among these costs for schools may be mentioned " free textbooks " $1,364,000, and "teachers' pensions" $1,720,- 000. Free textbooks have long been furnished to pupils too poor to pay for them, but the inno- vation is in furnishing all textbooks free. This is by no means universal. In some states this is a state and not a city charge. Teachers' pen- sions are not paid in all cities. In 1912, out of 19s cities fifty-three paid teachers' pensions, and five more had funds for that purpose. Less than half of this expense comes from funds furnished by the taxpayers. The greater part is from assessments levied on the teachers, which are handled somewhat after the analogy of insurance funds. We reach the end of the expenses of the cities with parks and other recreations which cost $18,- 800,000 and some miscellaneous items which amount to $14,600,000, The Growth of Expenses The growth of city expenditures presents many interesting phases. The aggregate expenses merely, exclusive of interest and borrowed money spent, and exclusive of the expenses of public service enterprises, increased for the 146 cities, for which continuous statistics are avail- 8o Government Finance able, from $272,400,000 in 1902 to $486,900,000 in 1912. But, of course, the population also increased. In proportion to population the in- crease is from $13.02 per capita in 1902 to $17.34 per capita. This is an increase in per capita cost of thirty-three per cent in an interval of ten years. It might be claimed that part of this increase is fictitious because of the shrinking in the pur- chasing power of money. Without going into the pros and cons of this claim, we may for argument's sake admit it. Professor Fisher's study of the purchasing power of money shows in a general way that it took about $1.23 in 1912 to buy as much as $1.00 would have bought in 1902. But for every dollar spent in 1902, the cities were spending $1.33 in 1912. Even if the fall in money accounts for twenty-three cents of the increase in each dollar per capita, there is at least ten cents more in each such dollar to be accounted for. This increase amounts to $1.30 annually for each inhabitant. But in fact there is much more than that to be accounted for. In the first place cities have cut down the loss of "graft," of which there is far less than there used to be. It is obvious also that there are many things which cities do which can be done more cheaply on a large scale than on a small scale. We need not specify these, but we may point out that street cleaning, street lighting, and dozens of other things can be done more cheaply if done in the same style, or with Municipal Expenditures 8i no better methods, in a city of 200,000 inhab- itants than in one of 100,000 inhabitants. This very illustration reveals the reason for the in- crease in cost which we find where a decrease was to be expected. Instead of the dim lights of ten years ago, cities are brilliant with ten or twenty times as many candle power per block along their " white ways " as they had along the same streets before. Practically every branch of city activity is doing more than it did ten years ago. This increase in civic work has eaten up the saving which came from doing things on a large scale and also the saving from the reduc- tion in "graft," and then about $1.30 per capita more, even if we allow to the utmost for the shrinkage in the purchasing power of money. The following table shows where the increases have been made. Per Capita Departmental Expenses Increase Per Cent of Aggregate Expenses Per Cent In 1912 In 1902 Total 33 100 100 General Government 43 11.8 10.9 Police II 1 1.9 13.4 Fire 24 9.2 9.5 Other Protection 330 1.9 1.3 Health 66 2.1 1.6 Sanitation 61 8.2 6.8 Highways 17 11.4 12.9 Charities, etc 35 6.7 6.4 Schools 39 28.5 27.5 Libraries 37 1.3 1.2 Recreation (parks) 10 3.8 4.5 Miscellaneous 50 3.2 3.8 82 Government Finance Let us inquire into the causes of these in- creases, comparing each one with the average or thirty-three per cent. The main cause why central or general govern- ment expense increased faster than the average is probably to be found in the increase in regula- tive work and, also, in public service enterprises, the expenses of which are not included here but the supervision of which causes more work for the central offices. That the cost of police did not increase as fast as the average, only eleven per cent against thirty-three per cent, is explained by the fact that here at least a part of the saving arising from doing things on a large scale has accrued to the tax payers. The fact that the police take only eleven and nine-tenths per cent of all the money spent for running expenses now as against thirteen and four-tenths ten years ago is gratify- ing. The same thing is true of the fire depart- ment but not to the same extent as the police. " Other protection " stands out in startling fashion. But these things are new and more- over were cared for, in some small degree, under other departments before, so the showing is somewhat artificial. As the cost is less than two per cent of the whole, we may pass this item. Health protection is growing twice as fast as the average, and sanitation is growing almost as fast as health protection. All of this, we must agree, is as it should be. It means money spent for the conservation of life and strength. Municipal Expenditures 83 Charities keep pace with the average growth. Schools and libraries are growing faster than the average city activities. This is all the more significant as it falls on nearly thirty per cent of the whole expenses. But as we have seen, the states' contributions are not keeping pace so well. The failure of recreation expenses to increase as fast as the average is easily explained. Parks are rarely utilized to their limit of capacity, and it costs but little more in the aggregate to care for a park visited by 20,000 people than one used by only 10,000. The miscellaneous are small items, mostly new. Among them are pensions. The Meaning of the Averages The figures we have been considering are aver- ages with many limitations. It is hardly safe to assume that they are normal or typical. The increase has not been at all steady throughout the period. The increase was most rapid in 1907, the departmental expenses in that year being eleven and eight-tenths per cent more than in 1906. Between 1908 and 1909 the increase was least, being only two and two-tenths per cent. In other words, the crisis of 1907 was preceded by a rapid growth of public expenditures and fol- lowed by a tendency to contract. Again while the average is $17.34 per capita in 1912, yet there are some cities which spend much more. Boston, for example, spends $28.06 ; Washington, D. C, $25.43; New York, $24.58; 84 Government Finance Denver, $20.13; Atlantic City, $22.76; Mount Vernon, $27.53. Many cities spend much less : Charlotte, N. C, only $6.44 ; Allentown, Pa., $6.47 ; Birmingham, Ala., $8.64 ; New Orleans, $12.79; Baltimore, $15.14. The average is pulled up by the relatively high per capita expense of the great cities. This is shown by the following table: No. of Cities Having a Per Capita Expenses Cities Population of for Departments 9 500,000 and over $21.24 9 300,000 to 500,000 19.99 95 100,000 to 300,000 14.22 IS 30,000 to 100,000 12.06 67 50,000 to 50,000 11.69 195 $17-34 Even in the first group there are six cities which spend less than $18.50 per capita, but the general average is pulled up by New York, which spends $124,500,000 out of the total of $267,800,- 000 for the group. In the second group the range is less and the average of $20 per capita in this class of cities may be regarded as typical. The third contains the largest number of cities. In this group sixty-eight out of the ninety-five cities spend less than the average. Twenty-five spend between $12 and $14 per capita, and all things considered $13 per capita is more rep- resentative of this group than $14.22. In the fourth group there is much less varia- tion and the average is fairly typical. Municipal Expenditures 85 In the last group again there are twenty-one out of sixty-seven cities in the group which spend between $10 and $12 per capita; hence the aver- age although pulled up a little by the heavy ex- penditures of San Diego, Cal., Newton, Mass., and Mount Vernon, N. Y., is fairly represen- tative. For the United States at large, however, the average of $17.34 is in no way typical. Because half the cities spend less than $12.10 and three- fourths less than $15 per capita. There is no pronounced grouping at any point, but there are 124 cities which spend as much as $9 per capita and less than $15, and the mid-point in that large group is $12 per capita. Hence $13.50 is prob- ably a fair average to use. The per capita costs for all purposes is, of course, much higher than any of these figures, as the table on page 86 shows ; but for comparison between cities departmental costs are the best. Public Service Enterprises Much of the work done by cities, which we have considered above, is cooperative or semi- socialistic. That is to say, the cities provide for the individual citizens things which they might — and for a long time did — provide for them- selves, or which might be provided by private enterprise. The big motor-driven street sweeper has taken the place of the primitive rule " let every man sweep in front of his own door," 86 Government Finance u o u Oh 03 lO rr IT) fO rx lO fo M VO 0) -^ CO d CO H^ 00 '^ d 3 HH *-t 6^ o OQ VO \n w ro ^^ 00 -< uS ro pi CNJ CNJ 0 00 f^ 00 lo q I-; ro to CO l-H "TD .< «4-l (J U ;-. C C3 tJ o ir: — QJ ■ ■ en en pense; Gen- al De C IL> s q 0\ 0) ^ ^ CO >"S ~ ,_, VO o ^ M c< o c ^ ro TtOO O ^ t^ (_5 a; en 6 ° 00 K 0\ ■4 CNI c>i ro CO C) N c< CO = c U m- < fc o o ~o~ Q • 5 c > 8 8 o o 8 o 8 8 8 o' lO > o •o in ro c o o o o O 2 ° o o _ 8 8 8 o o 8 5 o 8 8 o' d o O _o On On »o ui t^ lO 6 •■5 ON ►-» artial substitute for the personal property tax and is interwoven with the general property tax. It seems hardly possible to blend an income tax with a property tax. It takes a great deal of constant shaking to keep oil and water mixed, even as an emulsion. So it takes a great deal of agitation to keep the "oil of the income tax" emulsified with the " water of the property tax " and they will never make a true compound. The better way is to put the " oil " in one bottle and the " water " in another. Use the income tax as a state tax, the property tax as a local tax ! The complaint one hears from Wisconsin is that the man who pays on his land thinks that he, who pays the income tax alone, on income from a like amount in value of personal property, pays too little. This is a false issue, but it is enough to threaten the permanence of the tax. But if the income tax were wholly by itself as a state tax, and the property tax by itself as a local tax, and if no question of fitting the one into the other were raised by the procedure, the people would Receipts and Expenditures 153 soon come to consider them as separate taxes, each standing on its own bottom. There is no necessity for making the state tax " equal " to the local taxes any more than there is to make the taxes in New York equal to those in Buffalo. The objections to the income tax commonly raised in the United States in the past have been very serious. They are much less important to- day than they were, even a few years ago. The most potent have been : ( i ) that it is undemo- cratic and un-American, in that it is too inquisi- torial ; (2) that it cannot be administered equita- tily ; (3) that it is enough to tax the property, which is the source of the income. The author once held these objections to be conclusive against the income tax in the United States. He has changed his mind in view of the changed conditions. Practical experience, as a tax administrative official, has shown, to the author's satisfaction, that the American taxpayer with very few excep- tions is willing to pay his fair share of taxes. When property is concealed, it is generally such classes of property as cannot possibly bear the heavy tax rates imposed. The Wisconsin com- missioners confirm this view. Inquisition is al- ways resented. But inquiry, honestly and ob- viously directed solely to ascertaining the facts necessary to apportion the taxes equally, is, far from being resented, almost universally wel- comed. Twenty thousand corporations are taxed each year in California on their franchises. 154 Government Finance The data necessary to make the assessment in- clude many intimate details of a private business character. Yet they are always furnished, as soon as it is understood that they are to be used for equalizing the assessments. No income tax can be successfully assessed by the administrative machinery of taxation which we have had in the past. It is not enough to pass a law and leave it to township or other local assessors to administer. But the necessary machinery of administration can be, and in some cases has been, created. Wisconsin has done it for the income tax itself, and has succeeded even in the face of the adverse circumstances referred to above. Other states have done it for other taxes, harder to administer even than an income tax. A strong central taxing board does not be- come a bureaucratic agency dangerous to democ- racy. Witness, to the contrary, a dozen strong tax commissions, not omitting the new New York City Commissioners of Taxation and Assessment. It is not the strength, or power, given to such commissions that is the danger, but they are a menace if too weak. In several states where they have been too weak, or have had too little work of importance to do, they have succumbed to too much politics. An income tax is easier to enforce than the personal property tax. If a man returns his sav- ings bank account which yields him four per cent, he may, in some states, have to pay a tax of two per cent on the principal or one-half the Receipts and Expenditures 155 income. But if he returns the income and the tax is five per cent thereon, he has three and eight-tenths per cent left of the four per cent. In this case, the personal property tax is confisca- tory, the income tax is not. Theoretically, the income tax is superior in justice and equity to any other tax. The form of the income tax, best suited to use by the states, can be but briefly suggested : It should fall on all incomes from every source, above a fair subsistence for the family ; it should be graduated for larger incomes ; it need not be specially graduated for the different kinds of incomes from invested property — they are cov- ered by other taxes ; so far as possible it should be stopped at the source ; it should be adminis- tered by a central board through their own appointed agents. In each state the details would have to be adjusted to prevailing local traditions and industries. In many states it will be neces- sary to amend the constitution before an income tax can be introduced. REFERENCES GENERAL TREATISES Adams, H. C. Science of Finance. Henry Holt & Company, 1899. Bastable, C. F. Public Finance. The Macmillan Company, 1895. . Bullock, C. J. Selected Readings in Public Finance. Ginn & Co., 1906. Daniels, W. M. Elements of Public Finance. Henry Holt & Company, 191 1. FiLLEBROWN, C. B. Taxation. A. C McClurg & Co., 1914. Kennan, K. K. Income Taxation. Burdick & Allen, 1910. Plehn, Carl C. Introduction to Public Finance. The Macmillan Company, 1910. Seligman, E. R. a. The Income Tax. The Mac- millan Company, 1914. FEDERAL REPORTS Treasury — Annual Reports — Finance. President's Commission on Economy and Efficiency, House Documents, 62nd Congress, 2nd Session, Numbers 854, 458. STATE AND LOCAL REPORTS Only the largest libraries make complete collections of the state and municipal reports, but the census reports are available everywhere. 158 References Bureau of the Census. Abstract of special bulletins, Wealth, Debt, and Taxation, 1913. Government Printing Office, 1915. Note : Beginning on page 7 of the above re- port is a list of the publications of the census, referring to government finance. These publi- cations bring down to date the data in the volume of the Twelfth Census, Wealth, Debt, and Taxation, 1902. Bureau of the Census. Financial Statistics of Cities. Published annually. TAX COMMISSIONS AND THE LIKE: OLDER REPORTS Ely, R. T. Taxation in American States and Cities. Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1888. Chapman, J. W., Jr. State Tax Commissions in the United States. Johns Hopkins University Studies. Vol. XV, 1897. Seligman, E. R. a. Essays in Taxation. Eighth edition. The Macmillan Company, 1913. Chap- ters XIX, XX, XXI, and special biography. SIGNIFICANT RECENT REPORTS Kentucky. Special Tax Commission, 1913. Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. Regular annual reports of the Tax Commissions. DISCUSSIONS AND PAPERS Proceedings of the Annual Conferences of the National Tax Association. 15 Dey Street, New York. INDEX Administration, reform of tax, 141-143 Agriculture, federal aid to, 36; State aid to, 49 Aldermen, 70 Aldrich, Senator, quoted, 96 Allentown, 84 Apportionment of expenditures, 104 Art galleries, 9, 69 Assessment districts, 141 Assessors, 131-133, 143 Atlantic City, 84 Auditor, State, 99 Austria-Hungary, debt of, 44, 45 Averages, meaning of in city costs, 83 Baltimore, 84 Birmingham, Ala., 84 Bonds, public, 15 (See also Debt) Borrowing, public, 106-I15 Boston, 58, 83, 112 Bridges, city toll, 87 Budget, 97-100 Bullock, C. J., quoted, 27 Burden of federal government, 26 Business taxes, 126 California, debts, iii; expenditures, 52-56; revenues, 124, 125; tax burden in, 137 Canals, 9, 36 Cemeteries, 87 Central control of local expenditures, 64; of local taxa- tion, 64, 142 Central tax commission, 141 Census bureau, 20, 24, 48, 68, 87, 88 Cities, expenditures of, 47-51 •(See also Municipal) i6o Index Charlotte, 84 Charities, 9, 50, 69, 76 China, campaign in, 34 Choses in action tax, 149 City assessors, 143 ; expenses, 69-95 ; growth of expen- ditures, 79-83; manager, 71 Civilization and taxes, 7 Civil service, 100; federal commission of, 30 Civil war, cost of, 34 Classification of tax subjects, 140, 146, 147 Commission on economy and efficiency, 28 Commission form of city government, 70 Compulsory revenues, 36 Congress, cost of, 29 Connecticut, 149 Consular service, 36 Cost of government, 20-24; cities, 86, 94; estimate of, 21; federal, 22 ; in Minnesota, 22 Cost of war, history of in United States, 33, 34 Cost to tax-payers, defined, 21 Cost, meaning of, 21 Constructive police work, 72 Controller, 99 Consumption, 3, 4 Control, boards of, 48, 100-102 Corporations, bureau of, 35 Corrections, 76 Council, city, 70 Counties, expenditures of, 47, 48; revenues of, 130-133 Courts, federal, 35 Crematories, 87 Crown, cost of in Great Britain, 30 Cubberly, Prof., quoted, 62 Customs, 118 Debt, making rules for, 108 Debt, public, 106-115; concealed, no; federal, 42-45; local, 109; of different nations, 44-45; purposes of, III ; term of, 114 Denver, 84 Distribution, 3 District of Columbia, 37 District, road, 63; schools, 62 Docks, city, 87 Index i6i Donations, 3 Dresden china, 10 Earnings of public enterprises, 116 Economics of government, 6-19 Education, 62; bureau of, 31; municipal, jy; state aid to, 49 (See also Schools) Efficiency and economy, 96-105; federal, 40; in cities, 102-104 Elasticity of revenues, 41 Elections, cost of, 70 Electric plants, 9, 87, 90 Eliot, Ex-Pres., quoted, 15-17, 72 Elliott, Prof., quoted, 62 Ely, R. T., quoted, 146 Equalization, 142 Equal taxation, 145 Escheats, 117 Established church, 10 Evolution of public business, 6 Excises. 118 Expenditures, 5, 20; cities, 47-51; gross defined, 22,', local, 62-65; municipal, 66-95; of counties and minor civil divisions, 47, 48; state, 47-65 Expenses, city departmental, 81 Fall River, 59 Federal activities, scope of, 37-40 ; debt, 42-45 ; expendi- tures, 28; finances, 25-45; revenues, 118-122 Federal Reserve Banks, 35 Fees, 116, 117 Ferries, 87 Fines, 117 Fire department, 69; waste, y^ Fisher, T., quoted, 80 Fishery service, 36 Foods and drugs, inspection of, 35 Forestry service, 2i7 Fractional assessment, 141 France, debt of 44-45 Franchise taxes, 149 Free textbooks, 19, 79 I 62 Index Garbage, 75 Garfield, Pres., quoted, 27 Gas plants, 87, 90 General property tax, 122, 130, 131 Geological Survey, 31 German Empire, debt of, 44-45 Gifts, 117 Gobelin tapestry, 10 Government activities, 13; organized effort, 7 Grand Forks, 107 Halls, public, 87 Health, conservation of, 74 High schools, 49 Highways, 50, 76 Hospitals, 9, 69, 76 Illinois, expenditures of, 60; revenues of, 129 Immigration service, 35 Income tax, British, 121; federal, 41, 120; state, 150- 155; Wisconsin, 152 Indebtedness, see debt, Indian affairs, office of, 31 Indians, 36 Industrial accident boards, 49 Inheritance tax, 148 Interior department, 31 Internal revenues, 41, 118 Interstate Commerce Commission, 35 Investments, public, 116 Irrigation works, 36 Italy, debt of, 44, 45 Jails, 63 Japan, debt of, 44, 45 Justice, department of, 34 Kansas, 102 Kentucky, expenditures of, 56, 57; revenues of, 125; tax burden in, 137; tax report quoted, 132 Labor bureaus, 35, 49 Land office, 31 Laundries, 75 Libraries, 69 Index i6t, Licenses, ii8, 126, 150 Life-saving, 35 Lighthouses, 35 Lighting, 9 Local expenditures, 62-65 ; central control of, 64 Local revenues, 130 Local taxation, central control of, 64, 142 Los Angeles, U2 Lunch rooms, 87 Lowell, 59 Lynn, 59 Manufacturers public 10 Marine insurance, 40 Markets, 87 Massachusetts, expenditures of, 58, 59; revenues of, 128 Mexican war, 33 Mines, bureau of, 31 Minnesota, classification in, 147; expenditures of, 57; revenues of,. 127; tax burden in, 137; tax commission, 22, 28, 137 Money, issue of, 37 Mortgage taxes, 150 Mothers' pensions, 50 Mt. Vernon, 84 Municipal costs, 94; expenditures, 66-95; outlays, 93; revenues, 133-136 Museums, 9, 69 National banks, 43 Net cost to taxpayers, 23 New Bedford, 59 New England, fiscal system of, 46 New Orleans, 84 New York City, 78, 83, iii, 112, 139 New York State, expenditures of, 59, 60; revenues of, 128; tax burden in, 140 Newton, 85 Normal schools, 49 Old age pensions, 3 Organization tax, 149 Outlay, defined, 24 Outlays, municipal, 93 I 64 Index Patent office, 31, 36 Panama Canal, 29, 36, 40 Parks, 9, 69 Payments, defined, 23 Peace and order, preservation of, 32 Pennsylvania, 149; constitution quoted, 27 Pensions, bureau of, 31; city, 69; federal, 32; mothers', 50; teachers', 79 Philippines, campaign in, 34 Police, 69, 72 Poll tax, 118, 149 Poorhouses, 62, Post-office, 9, 36 Postal savings bank, ^7 Pre-audit, 100 President, cost of office, 30 Prisons, 63 Private vs. public enterprises, 9, 11, 14, 90 Private schools, 14, 17 Privateersmen. 8 Protection of life and property, 32, 71-76; tariff, 119 Providence, R. I., 52 Publications, federal, 2,6 Public buildings, federal, 32 Public debt, federal, 27 (See also Debt) Public enterprises, 13 Public health, federal care of, 35 Public lands, 2>7 Public management costly, 19 Public vs. private, (See Private vs. public) Public printing office, 30 Public purpose, 10 Public schools, 14-15 Public service enterprises, 82, 85-93 Public utility commissions, 48 Public works, 2>^ Railroad commissions, 48 Railroads, private vs. public, 11, 12 Receipts and expenditures, equation of, 1 16-155; federal, 41. Receipts, ten classes of, 116 Index 165 Reclamation service, 31 Reformatories, 63 Reform of taxation, 140, 141 Regulation, 10; in California, 53; of industry and com- merce. 35; of railroads, 12 Regulative police work, 72 Religion, 10 Revenues below expenses, 136 Revenues, problem of, 2 Revenues (See Federal, State, Local, Municipal) Revolutionary war, 33 Rhode Island, expenditures of, 51, 52; revenues of, 123, 124 Rivers and harbors, 36 Roads, 9 Road districts, 63 Robinson, E. V., quoted, 22, 28, 57 Russia, debt of, 44, 45 Safety, public, federal cost for, 35 Salaries, teachers, 78 San Diego, 85 San Francisco, 1 12 Sanitation, 35, 69, 75 Schools, 9, 49, 62, 63. 69, 77 School districts, 62. 106 Scientific research, 36 Seattle, no, 112 Segregation, 144 Scligman, on income tax, 118 Separation, 140, 143-146 Service, aim of government, 14 Sevres ware, 10 Sewers, 75 Single tax, 138 Smith. Adam, 32 Socialists, i Southern states, fiscal system of, 46 Spanish war, cost of, 34 Special assessments, no, n8 Springfield, 59 State activities, growth of. 47; sphere of. 39 State and local finance, 46-65 State expenditures, 47-65 I 66 Index State functions, 48 State income tax, 150, 155 State revenues, 122-130; examples of, 123 State rights, 38 State taxes, independent, 147-155 Steamboat inspection, 35 Streets, 69, j6 Street car service, 9, 87, 90 Subventions, 117 Taft, Pres.. commission on economy and efficiency, 28 Taft, Pres., quoted, 97 Tariff, 41 Tax administration, 141 Tax commissions, 48 Taxes, 116; defined, 117; direct and indirect, 118 Tax limit law, 5 Tax reform, 4, 140, 141 Textbooks, free. 79 Trade promotion, 36 Transfers, 21 Tribal religion, 7 Treasury department, federal. 31 Unearned increment, 138 Uniform accounts, 104 Uniformity of taxation, 143 United Kingdom, debt of, 44, 45 United States, debt of, 44, 45 (See Federal) Universities, state, 49 Utopians, i War, cost of to United States, 32 War of 1812, 33 Washington, D. C, 83 Water works, 9, 17. 18, 88. 113 Wilson, Pres., quoted, 97 Wisconsin, 56; income tax, 152; tax burden in, 137 Worcester, 59 This book is DUE on the last date stamped helow 1 6 \^^ ^'^ 11 1939 "^^'^ 1948 Form L-9-15m-7,'32 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY EACILI^^^ AA 001027 812 5 it m ! pii! 1 p;, ! !i ! 11 ! !: llliHili'H; ! ! Ill i' ' >. iiiiillhiil \mi m i i ii \m\\: I lililllliiil ijii