UC-NRLF B 3 352 132 '"•'-"■' "'At*'-:.' ■ SP? '.■'•••'-•..■ as; ORIGINAL POET RY ORIGINAL POETRY BY VICTOR SP CAZIRE [PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY Gf ELIZABETH SHELLEY] Edited by RICHARD GARNETT C.B., LL.D. Tublished by JOHN LANE, at the Sign of the Bodley Head in LONDON and NEW YORK MDCCCXCVIII IK sv«l 7 Ballantyne Press London &f Edinburgh INTRODUCTION Between the completion of" £>ueen Mab " in 1 8 1 3, and the composition of " Alas tor" in 18 15, Shelley underwent a silent internal revolution which trans- formed a vigorous writer in verse into a great original poet. Much the same transformation had previously occurred to Coleridge, but with this difference, that in the elder poet's case the metamorphosis is manifestly due in great measure to the influence of Wordsworth, but in Shelley's the impulse is wholly from within. The two poets, however, have this in common, that, unlike Wordsworth, Byron, and others who cannot claim to be enumerated among " the twice-born" from the period of their regeneration onward, their works are almost free from admixture with a prosaic element. Alone among the illustrious poetical reputa- 25336G VI tions of their age, their fame would decidedly not be promoted by the suppression of any considerable proportion of their compositions after this crisis in their intellectual history. The test is an especially severe one as regards Shelley, not only because the actual bulk of his poetical work is so much greater than Coleridge's, but because he has triumphantly borne such an ordeal from the publication of mere fragments of it as has perhaps fallen to the lot of no other poet. Few indeed are the morsels collected in " The Relics of Shelley," and subsequently incor- porated in his works, which a votary of his genius would part with for any consideration. They are not chips, but diamond dust. In proportion, however, to the habitual excellence of Shelley s and Coleridge's work after the full development of their powers, is its inferiority in " the ages of ignorance." Shelley's beginnings are far the more unpromising, and every admirer of his genius must have frequently wished that the whole of his poetical production prior to " Queen Mab " could be bestowed as " alms for oblivion." Seldom have Vll the begi?wings of a poet been so destitute of merit as his early lyrics. Why, then, it may be asked, retrieve any more of them from obscurity ? The question appears pertinent, but only to the uninitiated. The bibliographer and the book-hunter, no less than the Shelleian student, know that the recovery of the little book now republished from an unique copy is the final chapter of a romance, and a bibliographical event as rare as, according to Petrarch, the appearance of a Laura in heaven : — " £hiod optanti dlvum promittere nemo trfuderet." The existence of a previously, unheard-of volume of poems by Shelley and an unknown coadjutor, pub- lished in 1 8 1 o under the title of " Original 'Poetry, by Victor and Cazire," was first announced by the present writer in an article entitled " Shelley in Pall Mall," in Macmillan's Magazine for June, i860. The fact had been ascertained by himself when, in August or September 1859, in the exercise of what was then his ordinary duty, he placed a V1U newly purchased periodical entitled Stockdale's Budget, and published in 1826-7, on tne shelves of the Library of the British Museum. This Budget was a scandalous periodical, in which the publisher Stockdale, who had been ruined by his publication of the still more scandalous " Memoirs of Harriet Wilson" sought to avenge himself upon society by raking together all the misdemeanours of the upper classes he could collect from the newspapers. Shelley was then commonly regarded as a social pariah, and fair game for a professional lampooner of the grade to which the once respectable publisher had sunk. Stockdale, remembering that he had letters from Shelley in his possession, began in the very first number of his Budget to utilise them for " copy" and make them the basis of a history of the acquaint- ance which had existed between the ill-matched pair in 1 8 1 o, without, it must be said, any trace of unkindness to the poet, whom he seems to have appreciated as fully as possible for one who, although accidentally an Ishmaelite, was congenitally a Philistine. Thus the story of " Victor and Cazire " IX came to light. It shall be related in Rockdale's own words, with the retrefichment of some im- material particulars. " The unfortunate subject of these very slight recollections intro- duced himself to me early in the autumn of 1810. With anxiety in his countenance, he requested me to extricate him from a pecuniary difficulty in which he was involved with a printer, whose name I cannot call to mind, but who resided at Horsham. [Stockdale should have said Worthing.'] I am not quite certain how the difference between the poet and the printer was arranged ; but, after I had looked over the account I know that it was paid, though whether I assisted in the payment, by money or acceptance, I cannot remember* "Be that as it ?nay, on the ijth September, 1810, / received fourteen hundred and eighty copies of a thin royal octavo volume in sheets. It was entitled, c Original PoetryJ by Jlonzo and Cazire, or two names something like them. The author told me that these poems were the joint production of himself and a friend, whose name was forgotten by me as soon as I heard it. I advertised the * It is remarkable that Stockdale speaks of himself as the sole agent in the negotiation with Shelley, and ignores the existence of a senior partner in his father, who lived until 1814. It appears, from the memoir of the elder Stockdale in the " Dictionary of National Biography," that his business consisted largely in the purchase of " remainders" which may have facilitated the arrangement with the Worthing printer. X work) which was to be retailed at 35. 6d., in nearly all the London papers of the day* " Some short time after the announcement of the poems I happened to be perusing them, with more leisure than I had till then had leisure to bestow upon them, when I recognised one which I knew to have been written hy Mr. M. G. Lewis, the author of*- The Monk,'' and I fully anticipated the probable vexation of the juvenile author when I communicated my discovery to Mr. P. B. Shelley. " With all the ardour natural to his character he expressed the warmest resentment at the imposition practised upon him by his coadjutor, and entreated me to destroy all the copies, of which about one hundred had been put into circulation." Such is the history of " Victor and Cazire " according to Stockdale. It was merely the prelude to an acquaintance of some duration between author and publisher, productive of interesting correspondence published in the Budget, in Macmillan's Magazine, and in ?nore than one edition of Shelley*s letters. * An advertisement of u Original Poetry," by Victor and Cazire, did in fact appear in the Morning Chronicle of September 18, 18 10, the very day after Stockdale had received the copies. The book was briefly reviewed in the Poetical Register, and Professor Dowden has unearthed a more ample, but by no means complimentary, notice in the British Critic, so late as April 181 1. XI One letter alone, however, concerns us now as re- lating to " Victor and Cazire." " Field Place, Sept. 6, 1810. " Sir, " / have to return you my thankful acknowledgment for the receipt of the books, which arrived as soon as I had any reason to expect ; the superfluity shall be balanced as soon as I pay for some books which I shall trouble you to bind for me. "I enclose you the title-page of the Poems, which, as you will see, you have mistaken on account of the illegibility of my hand- writing. I have had the last proof-impression from my printer this morning, and I suppose the execution of the work will not be long delayed. As soon as it possibly can, it shall reach you, and believe me, Sir, grateful for the interest you take in it. " / am, Sir, " your obedient, humble servant, "PERCT B. SHELLET." It only remains to be added as regards the Budget that it is itself a book of great rarity ; that the Museum copy had been bought in January, 1859 ; and that nothing can more conclusively show the wisdom of purchasing everything for the national library, however apparently unpromising. Not only do we owe our knowledge of the very existence of Shelley's first published volume of verse to this xu unsavoury publication, but without it the book might have turned up and passed from hand to hand without any suspicion of Shelley s authorship of anything in it occurring to any one. Alice remarked in Wonderland that she had often seen a cat without a grin, but rarely a grin without a cat. It is common enough to find a book without a title, not so common to find a title without a book. 'The situation thus created for Shelleian book-hunters was a trying one. They were delivered from the peril of ignorance ; they were in no danger of passing a " Victor and Cazire " unheeded, or of trading it away. But to what end this unprofitable knowledge ? " De non exi stent ibus et de non apparentibus eadem est ratio." The ardour of chase among Shelleians and boo\-hunters may be guessed, but " never can be wholly known." Some may have gone as far as that singularly determined character who once upon a time turned out the whole of Lacy's theatrical stock in quest of i( Swellfoot the Tyrant," and got it. If any one was now equally resolute, he was not equally successful. Thirty-eight years elapsed ere the Xlll destined knight appeared in the person of Mr. "John Lane, to whom the evasive volume was brought by Mr. V. E. G. Hussey, the son of Mrs. Hussey, of ^uatrebras, Dorchester, herself a daughter of the Rev. Charles Henry Grove, brother of the Harriet Grove to whom many of the poems are addressed, and who had been frequently, though, as we shall see, erroneously, identified with " Cazire." Bound up with the Third Canto of " Childe Harold," Byron s " Corsair " and "Lara," and his "Lament of Tasso," and adorned with Mr. Grove's bookplate, the volume had remained peacefully on his shelves since, perhaps, 1 824. An inserted leaf bearing that date as a water mark shows that it was not bound before that year, nor, in all probability, very long afterwards. Although the present scrupulously faithful and all but facsimile reprint accurately reproduces the con- tents of the volume, it may be convenient to enumerate the pieces here, with numbers for the sake of refer- ence. 1. Letter [Cazire]. 2. Letter [Cazire]. XIV 3. Song [Victor], 4. Song [Victor]. 5. Despair [Victor]. 6. Sorrow [Victor]. 7. Hope [Victor]. 8. Song translated from the Italian [probably Cazire] . 9. Song translated from the German [doubtful]. 10. The Irishman's Song [Victor]. 11. Song [perhaps the plagiarised poem; if not , by Victor]. 12. Song [Victor]. 13. Song [Victor]. 14. St. Edmonas Eve [doubtful]. 15. Revenge [Victor ; if not, a plagiarism]. 16. Ghasta; or, the avenging Demon [Victor]. 17. Fragment [reprinted as "Victoria" in "St. Irvyne" Victor]. 'These seventeen pieces occupy sixty pages, and four more are devoted to the title-page and table of con- tents. The impression probably consisted of fifteen XV hundred copies, twenty of which would be retained by the writers. The copies sent to t/ie newspapers must have been merely stitched in wrappers, and the same was probably the case with the presentation copy now recovered, or it would hardly have been bound up with other pamphlets. It is unlikely that nearly so many copies as the number stated by Stockdale were put into circulation. The crudity of Shelley's early verse is too well known to permit the expectation of any accession to his fame from the discovery of so juvenile a production. There are, nevertheless, more points of interest in connection with the little volume than might have been expected, and to have apprehended these is to have in some measure extended our knowledge of the youth- ful Shelley. Our first business is to determine the identity of his coadjutor, and the extent of their respective participation in the book. The former of these investigations presents no difficulty. It has always been supposed that Cazire, probably borrowed from some French conte or novelette, must be a female name, and must denote either Shelley's sister XVI Elizabeth or his cousin and betrothed, Harriet Grove. 'There can now be no doubt on the former of these points ; the second poem (To Miss , from Miss ) being assuredly the composition of a young lady. The authorship is hardly less apparent, the poem in question being an epistle from one of the two cousins to the other ; and the identity of the writer with Elizabeth Shelley appearing from the unmelh- fluous couplet : " For they're all alike, take them one with another, Begging pardon — with the exception of my brother" The exception to the general demerit of masculine youth must clearly be the swain to whom the writer s friend is engaged; and as Harriet Grove was betrothed to Elizabeth Shelley s brother, not Elizabeth to Harriet's, the identity of the writer is fully established* The two initial pieces are the only two which can be attributed to Elizabeth Shelley with absolute' * Elizabeth Shelley never married. She died in December 1831, nged 37. XVII certainty ; though others in the volume may possibly belong to her. Its contents may be classified thus : i . Familiar poems in the style of Ansteys " Bath Guide" the first two in the volume, already mentioned as by Elizabeth Shelley. 2. A cycle of little poems evidently addressea by Shelley to Harriet Grove, in the summer of 1810. (Nos. 2-7, 12, 13.) 3. 'Tales of terror and wonder in the style of Monk Lewis. (Nos. 14-17.) 4. A few miscellaneous pieces. {Nos. 8— 11.) Elizabeth Shelley s vers de societe need no special characterisation. They are lively enough, and their occasional offences against grammar and metre are evidently due to the inexperience of the writer, who is not unaware of the necessity of frequent reference to the grammar and dictionary, though this does not save her from mistaking arraign for arrange. Considering, indeed, that Elizabeth Shelley was only seventeen, having been born on May 10, 1794, they evince quite as much finish as could be reasonably expected. The b XV111 really interesting points are the allusion to the engage- ment of the writer s brother to her cousin and correspondent, and the hint of some distrust of its stability. We have seen that the metrical epistle must have been addressed to Harriet Grove, and the blank in the line " Now your parcel's arrived 's letter shall go" may be confidently filed up with Percy's or Bysshe's. 'The name ijnmediately excites the inauspicious aspira- tion : " / hope all your joy mayn't be turned into woe," a vein of thought pursued in several sequent lines, evidently sincerely felt and much the best in the piece. 'These verses are dated April 30, 18 10. ILarlier in the month Shelley had been with his lady-love, and on parting from her had addressed to her the " Song " (No. 4), artless lines not devoid of a touch of real poetical quality. The blanks must of course be filed with " Harriet" a name conducive to dactylic or ana- paestic measures. The three following pieces, dated XIX in June and August, seem to adumbrate a misimder- standing and a reconciliation, such fallings in and out of love as would be likely to characterise the attach- ment of two such young people. On the whole, we seem to gain the impression that Shelley s Jee lings were more deeply interested than some of his biographers have allowed. He may well have thought of Harriet Grove when he afterwards wrote of Cosimo and Fiordispina : " They were two cousins, almost like to twins, Except that from the catalogue of sins Nature had raxed their love, which could not be, But by dissevering their nativity. 'This little cycle of love-verses, although with all its amazing incorrectness poetically the best section of the volume, exhibits so little affinity to Shelley s maturer style that it might have been attributed to his sister but for the unequivocal reference to Harriet Grove in the first of them, which there is no sufficient reason to separate fr 0771 the others. A stanza, more- over, in the song to Hope (No. 7) : XX " The vermeil-tinted flowers that blossom Are frozen but to bud anew. Then, sweet deceiver, calm my bosom, Although thy visions be not true" seems to have been dimly present to Shelley s mind when he wrote, about 1 8 1 7 : " Such is my heart : roses are fair, And that at best a withered blossom ; But thy false care did idly wear Its withered leaves in a faithless bosom" The symbol of the frozen rose is also repeated in the same poem : For the planet of frost, so cold and bright, Makes it wan with her borrowed light." The blank in the eighth line of another poem of this cycle (No. 1 2) must undoubtedly be filled by " Percy " or " Shelley!' We pass to another division of the poems in this little volume more characteristic than love-verses of the youthful Shelley — the tales of terror and wonder in the manner of Monk Lewis. Compositions in this taste, the first crude fruit of the Romantic School, in XXI England as everywhere else, preceded and preluded its really great achievements. England, indeed, had shown other nations the way with Horace WalpoWs " Castle of Otranto" and when " Victor and Cazire " were beginning to sing, Anne Radcliffe, a writer of true genius, was usually considered the first living novelist. The taste of the day is thus pleasantly satirised by Miss Austen, not an authority to be suspected of gross exaggeration : " When you have finished c Udolpho] we will read c The Italian ' together ; and I have made out a list of ten or twelve more of the same kind for you" " Have you, indeed ? How glad I am ! What are they all?" " / will read you their names directly ; here they are in my pocket-book. ' Castle of Wolfenbach] c Clermont] ' Mysterious Warnings] ' Necromancer of the Black Forest] ' Midnight Bell] c Orphan of the Rhine] and i Horrid Mysteries.' Those will last us some time." " Tes, pretty well ; but are they all horrid? Are you sure they are all horrid ? " 11 Tes, quite sure." (" North W - NOV 28 1962 w^ tf REC D LD OCT JVM -ft » Jun'bbAA P^C : LD MAY 2 5 $5-2 PM LD 21A-50m-3,'62 ^C7097slO)476B General Library University of California Berkeley