636.5 D988a $ THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES y APRIL 18'27. MODERN PUBLICATIONS, AND NEW EDITIONS OP VALUABLE STANDARD WORKS, PRINTED FOR LONGMAN, REES, ORME, BROWN, Sf GREEN, LONDON. 1. The LIFE of NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE, Emperor of the French. By the Author of Wavehley, &c, — Nearly ready. TRAVELS of the RUSSIAN MISSION through MONGOLIA to CHINA. By George Timkowski, with Notes, by M. J. Klaproth. Illustrated by Maps, Plates, &c. &c. — Nearly ready. In 2 vols. 8vo. The HISTORY of the RISE and PROGRESS of the UNITED STATES of NORTH AMERICA, till the British Revolution in 1&88. In 2 vols. 8vo. Price 11. 8s. Bds. By James Grahame, Esq. 4. The BUSY BODIES : a Novel. the " Odd Volume." — Nearly ready. By the same Authors, The ODD VOLUME. Second Series. By the Authors of the Odd Volume. — Nearly ready. In 3 Vols. By the Authors of A 3d Edition of the ODD VOLUME. 8vo, Price 10s. 6d. Bds. -5. The EPICUREAN : a Tale. Nearly ready. By Thomas Brown the Younger. 6. The HISTORY of the REIGN of HENRY the EIGHTH; comprising the Political History of the Commencement of the English Reformation : being the First Part of the Modern History of England. By Sharon Turner, F.A.S. R.A.L. 2nd Edit. In Two Vols. 8vo. Price 11. 6s. Bds. By the same Author, The HISTORY of the ANGLO- SAXONS ; comprising the History of England from the earliest Period to the Norman Conquest. 3Vols. »vo. 4th Edit. 21. 53. Bds. The HISTORY of ENGLAND, dur- ing the MIDDLE AGES; comprising the Reigns from William the Conqueror to the Accession of Henry VIII., and also the History of the Literature, Poetry, Religion, the Progress to the Re- F iRMATioN, and the Language of Eng- .AND during that Period. 2d Edition, .) Vols. 8vo. 31. Bds. The above Volumes together contain the complete HISTORYof ENGLAND, from the earliest period to the Death of Henry VIII. in 10 Vols. 8vo. price 61. lis. \ Modem Publications, and Sew Editions of Faluable Standard Works, 7. A HISTORY of the M AHRATTAS. By James Okant Diff, Etiq- Captain 1st, or Grenadier Retiuaeul ui hunibay Native Inruntry, uiiii latr Political Resident at Sutara. In 3 VoIk. Hvo. with Plates, and a Map of the Mahratta Country, (hietty from original and recent SurreyB; also a Map of India, shewing the ancient divi- sions of the Ueccau. Price .1. ISs. Bds. Besides the records of the Mahratta Governments of Poona and Satara, and those of the Kn)(li$h East India Company, the authorities for this work are from a great variety of authentic sources, hitherto inaccessible to the public. 8. NOTES and REFLECTIONS during a RAMBLE in GER- By the Author of " Recollections of tlie Peninsula," &c. &c. In 1 Vol. 8vo. MANY. 12s. Bds Bt the same AiKlior, The STORY of a LI FE. 2 Vols, post 8»o. 2d Edit. ISs. Bds. . . . . " \Vr intnliintarily r^llntr, and tmilr, and werp, and reco%er apain and pause in wondrr at the «>kitl nf (he magicKin uho^e wand has burh ftran^c power orer our facllllie^." Monthly Review. SCENES «f Impressions in EG^TT and ITALY. 2d Edit. 1 v. 8»-o. 12s. Bds. " Such is the merit and charm of the volume' before us, llu-y place us at once by the side of the author, and brin? before our eyes and niinds the Kenes he haa passed through, and ihe feel- ings they tuggestea."— -£di» the same Author, LALLA ROOKH, an ORIENTAL ROMANCE. 13th Edit, in 8vo. 14s. Also, ILLUSTRATIONS of the POEM, by Westall, 8vo. 12s. The LOVES of the ANGELS ; the Fourth Edition, 8vo. 9s. Boards. ILLUSTRATIONS of the POEM, from Designs by Westall, 8vo. 5s. Alodern PubUcalions,and Sew Editions of yaluable Standard fVorks, 23. An KNCVCLOP-EDIA of ACRICULTIJKE; or tlie Theory oiul Pruitioo of tlu- Valuation, Trunsfer, Improvement, und Mnnuf;oment, of Landed Pro- perty ; nnrt the Cultivation and Kionomy of the Animal and Vugeiuhle Produitions of Agri- culture, including all the latest improvement« : a general History of Agriculture in all Coun- tries, and u statistical view of its present state, with suggestions for its future progress in the British Isles. By J.C. I.oidon, F.L.S. H.S.&c. Author of the " Encydopiedia of Gar- dening'." Illustrated with upwards of 800 Engravings on Wood, by Braubton. 21. 10s. Bds. 24. WOODSTOCK, or the CAVALIER; a Tale of Sixteen HuNUREP and Fiktv One. By the Adthok of Wavkhlbv. In 3 Vols, post tivo. II. lis. (id. Uds. 25. MK.MOIRS of ELIZABETH STUART, QUEEN of BOHE- MIA, Daughter of King James 1. ; with Sketihes of the most distinguished personages, and the stiite of Society in HoUaad and Germany, during the 17th Century. By Miss Bkn<:i:ii. In 2 Vols. j>ost 8vo. 11. -Is. Bds. By ihe ►anie Aullinr, ME.MOIRS of .MAkV, QUEEN of SCOTS, with Anecdotes of the Court of HENRV the SECOND, during her Re- sidence in France. In 2 Vols. 8vo. with agcnuine Portrait, never before engraved. Price 11. 4s. Bds. 2d Edit. MEMOIRS of the LIFE of ANNE BOLEYN, Queen of Henry VIM. 2d Edit, in 2 Vols, with 2 Portraits, 16s. MEMOIRS of the late Mrs. ELIZA- BETH HAMILTON. Thu 2d Edition, 2 Vols. 8vo. with a Portrait, Price II. Is. Boards. MEMOIRS of Mr. JOHN TOBIN, Author of the Honey-Moon. In 8to. Price 12s. Bds. MEMOIRS of HENRY the FOURTH of FRANCE.— Jn the press. 26. TRAVELS among the ARAB TRIBES inhabiting the Coinitries East of Syria and Palestine : including a Journey from Nazareth to the Mountains beyond the Dead Sea ; from thence through the Great Plains of the Hauran to Bozra, Damascus, Tripoli, Lebanon, Baalbeck, and by the Valley of the Drontes to Seleucia, Antioch, and Aleppo. By J. S. Buckin(;ham, Esq. With an .Appendix, containing a Refutation of certain unfounded Calumnies circulated against the Author by Mr. Lewis Burckhardt, BIr. William John Bankes, and the Quarterly Review. In 4to. with Illustrations, and a Map of the Author's Route, 31. I3s. fid. bds. •' Mr. Uuckiiijfiiini is a ler) clever, obstrvani, and meritorious irateller."— Bc/«/io Rericte. By the same Auihor, TR.WELS in PALESTINE, through ! Visit to the Cities of Geraia and Gam.ila, the Countries of Bashan and Gii.K.\n. I '" ""^ Decapolis. 2 Vols. 8vo. 2d Edit. East of the River JonuAN; including a I with Maps, Pis. & Vigns. 11. lis. fid. Bds. 27. The POETICAL WORKS; the Correspondence; and other Prose Pieces of Anna L.«TiTiA Bakbaui.d. \Vith a Memoir. By Lrrv Aiki n. 2 Vols. 8vo. Price 11. 4s. Bds. Also m-u be had, MEMOIRS of the COURTof OUEEN ELIZABETH. By Lurv Aikin. 6th Edit. 2 Vols. 8vo. II. ."is. Bds. ME.MOIRS of the COURT of KING JAMES the FIRST. By Lucy Aikin, 2 Vols. 8vo. 3d Edit. 11.48. Bds. 28. DE EOIX ; or. Sketches of the Manners and Customs of the Fourteenth Century. By Anna Emza Bkav, late IMrs. C. SroTHAnn, Author of Letters written during a Tour through Normandy, Britanny, and other Parts of France, in 18!8; Memoirs of the Life of the late Charles Alfred Stothurd, F.S.A . &c. &c. In :i Vol*, post 8vo. Price II. 7b. Bds. 29. A VOYAGE TOWARDS THE SOUTH POLE; containing an Examination of the AntariKus of IMr. tlaxman, more than lo any other siuf;le cause. Undertakinsr the task of illustrating the great poets of ancient and of modern times, literature has aided the progress of the art; and niajiy who miffht have been reluctant admirers of statues or relievcis, were taught lo appreciate the merit of eli^si^ns ronnectcfi with the (inest passives in Homer, Dante, lEscliylus, and Hesioil. The publication of these great works, combining the richest variety of inveuiion with the most classical correctness, and all the grace of simplicity, has made the beauties of the art fauiiliar in every library in the kingdom," — Editibuygh RevieWj 86. " To the aid of his art he brought a loftier and more poetical mind than any of our preceding sculptors; and liarrung unites with good sen-e and natural genius in all the works which come from bis hand. He lias pci'elrateil with a far deeper sense of the majesty of Homer into the Iliad and Odyssey tlian Canova, who dedicated his whole life lo the renovation of the anticpie, nor has be failed to catch the peculiar inspiration of whatever poet his fancy selected for illiisiralion. He has never failed to relieet a true general image of the great original : we see the same grave majesty and the same simplicity, and we own the gioupe ai nm e as the offsprinu' of the spirit of Homer, .i:si hylui, or [)aiite. These works have spreail the fame of Flaxiuan far ami wide— for lliey lly where marble cannot be carried; they have jjiven the world a high idea of the present genius of Englan i." — Quartcily Review, 67. Modtrn Publications, and New Editions of Valuabh Standard Works, LETTERS from the IRISH HIGHLANDS of CUNNEMARRA. By a Fauily Partv. Second Edition, post 8ro. lUs. 6d. Bds. 37. A PRAXIS on tlie LATIN PREPOSITIONS, bein<. an Attempt to illustrate llieir Origin, Power, and Sitfnitication in the way of Kxeriise, for tlie Use of Schools. By Samubi. Buti-ek, U.U. F.K.S. and S.A. itc. Archdeacon of Derby, Head Master of tlie Royal Free Urainmar School of Shrewsbury. 2d Kd. In bvo. Price Ts. t>d. bd. By the same ATLAS of MODERN GEOGRA- PHY, consisting of "J'i Coloured Maps, from a new Set of Plates, corrected to l&Za, with a complete Index of all the Names. 12s. half-bound. ATLAS of ANCIENT GEOGRA- PHY, consisting of 21 Coloured Maps with a complete accentuated Index. 12s. half' bound. GENERAL ATLAS of ANCIENT and JIOUKKN GKOGKAPHY, 43 Col. Maps, and two Indexes. 11.4s. hf.-bd. • «• The Indexes, now for the first time appended to these Atlases, contain the la- titude and longitude of all the places: and in that of the Ancient Atlas, the ijitanli- ties are also marked. Author, A SKETCH of MODERN ami AN- CIKNT GEOGUAPHY, for the Use of Schools. 7th Edit. I Vol. 8vo. 9s. bds. In the present edition of tliis little work, the Author has made some very important additions, chiefly in the Modern part of it. OUTL I N E G KOG R Al' H I C AL COPY- BOOKS, in 4to. with the Lines of Lati- tude and Longitude only; intended as Practical Exercises for the Pupil to till U]\ from Dr. Butler's Atlases of Ancient and Modern Geography, and designed as an Accompaniment. 48. each, sewed; or "s. fid. together. OUTLINE MAPS of ANCIENT GEOGRAPHY; being a Selection, by Dr. Butler, from U'Anville's .\ncient Atlas : intended as Practical Exercises for the Pupil to fill up, on Drawing Co- lombier, folio. Price 10s. Cd. 38. A Domestic Tale. And other Poems. By Thomas Campbei.i,, Esq. '2d Edition. Foolscap 8vo. 8s. bds. By the same Author, The PLEASURES of HOPE, with other POEMS. In foolscap 8vo. with Plates by R. Wbstai.i., R.A. 8s. Bds. THEODRIC. GERTRUDE of WYOMING, and other POEMS. In f.cap 8vo. the 8th Edit, with Plates by Westai-i.» 9s. Bds. The Plates may be had seiiarate, to illus- trate the former Editions. The Pleasures of Hope, Price 98. 4to. and 5s. foolscap Svo. Gertrude of \\'yoming. Price "s. 4to. arxi 4s. foolscap 8vo. 39. BODY and SOUL, consisting of a Series of lively and patlietic Stories, calculated to excite the Attention and Interest of the Religious World. In 2 Vols. Vimo. The 4th Edition, with Additions. Price 168. Bds. The VILLAGE PASTOR. Consist- ing of a Series of Essays on Subjects in- teresting to the Religious World. By One of the Authors of Body and Sol'l. CONTEXTS : A Domestic Sketch— A Village Church — An Old and a Young Squire— Friend- ship and Affection — Faith and Practice — Feelings- The Stranger — Tlic Seven- teenth Article — Trials— Reprobation — Pastoral Visitlnps — A Recapitulation — Retribution — -The Lord's Day. In 1 Vol. 12mo. 8«. The TWO RECTORS, in Ten Papers, Illustrative of the Sentimeiits of the Two Parties in t)ie (Miiircli of England. • Contents: The Mail Coach— Tlie Book- seller's Shop — Social Intercourse — The MisMlonary — Patriotism — Amusements — The Keeper's Lodge— The Repentant Criminal — The Church Service — The Departure. By the other Author. 12mo. 2d Kdilidii. Price 10s.r>d. Bds. The CONVERT. By the Author of the Two llKfTORS ; In which the Argu- ments fur and against the several Sece- ders from tl-e Church are wciijhcd and contrasted with the Tenets, Doctrine, and Worship of the Establlsliment, In a manner calculated to excite the Interest of the Reading Community. Ce Socinlan — Galvanism — The Anatomist (the Miiti-rialist) — The Abliey ^t/ir liiip- /I'sO— Catholicism— Tlie tinaker — The Chiirdiman — Tlie Jilaiflen'K Story (Con- Pfrsion.) In 12mitli co- loured Plates of Gold and Diamond Mines in Kraril, Lcml Sline at Matlock, and Tlilrty various Minerals ; lUso Plates' of the Primitive, Secondary, and Coal Formation. By J. MAWF. Kth Edition, /"s. Hoards. Tliis little work is written from practice, and conducts the learner into the earliest way of diKcriminatltig minerals. By llif ».ime Author, New DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE of MINEU.\LS, greatly extended, with Diagrams of their Sim|)le Forms. 7th Edition. Price (Js. TREATISE on DIAMONDS and PRECIOUS STONES, with coloured Plates, describing the Method of disco- vering the real (Jem from Composition, with a Scale of the Size, Appearance, and Value of Diamonds, polished or rough. 2d Edition. Price l&s. INTRODUCTION to the STUDY of CONCHOLOGY. 8vo. with 7 Plates, 9s. plain, or 14s. coloured. The LTNN^AN SYSTEM of CON- CHOLOGY, in fvo. with a Plate to each Genera (36); plain, 11. Is.; coloured after nature, 21. 128. 6d. TRA\ELS through the GOLD and DIAJIOND DISTKICT of iJKAZII,, with TOPOfiRAPHK'AL PLATES of the MINKS, shewini,' the Mode of Work- lug; also the slate of .Agriculture, Com- merce, &c. New Edition, with various other Plates, and Map of the Author's Route. 18s. The Mines working by the Brazilian Com- pany are particularly noticed. 48. DOMESTIC DUTIES; or. Instructions to Yotinc,r Married Ladies, on the Management of their Households, and the Regulation of their Conduct in the various Relations and Duties of Married Life. Bv Sirs. William Pahkes. 2d Edit. lUs. 6d. bds. " The volume before us Is one of iho»i' prartical workfi, wliicli arc of real value and utility. It is a liorffct torfe niri-Mm for llie younjf married lady, who ni;iy rrsnrl to it on all queiiilon» of household i< nnoiiiy and eti(|iielle Thtre is nothing oniUlcd with »hich it behoves a lady to be acquainted."— AVw Monthly Mag, 49. The HISTORY and ANTIQUITIES of BATH AHBEY CHURCH ; with Ten Engravings, by J. and H. Lk Kklx, from Drawings by Map- KKNZiE. fiQ. Royal 8vo. 11. Medium 4to. U. lis. 6d. Imperial 4to. 21. 2s. By John Brit- Tox, F.S.A., &c. Bjr the same Author, The CATHEDRAL ANTIQUITIES of ENGLAND ; or, an Historical, Archi- tectural, and Gra|jhicul Illiislratiun of the English Cathnlral Churches. Price r2s. per Number in Medium 4to. : and 11. in Imperial 4to. ; .37 Numbers are already published. Each Size to class with the ArrhitirtiirnI Aiitiijuitii'ii of Great Ilritiiin. The foUowiiif; are com- plete, and may be had sepnr;ite, viz. Salisbury Cathedral, with 31 Engravings, med. 4to. 31. ;is.; iinii. 4to. .'il. .Is. ; cr. fol. 81. ; suproy. fol. 111. Bds. Norwich, with 2.') Plates, mcd. 4to. 21. Ids. ; imp. 4to. 41. 4-i. ; cr. fol. Ol. 10s. ; sup.- roy. fol. Ml. \(U. Bds. Winchester, meil. 4to. .31. 39. ; imp. 4to. U\ .'is.; cr. fill. 81.; Rup.-roy. fol. 111. York, wilh:i.'i Engravings, med.4to. 31. l.'is.: imp. 4to. Til. Gs. ; cr. fol. Ul. 'Js. ; sup.- roy. fol. 121. 12b. Bds. Lichfield, with Ifi Engravings, med. 4to. 11.18s.; imperial 4to. 31. 3s.: sup.-roy. fol. Gl.fis. Bds. Oxford, med. 4to. 11.4s.; imp.4to. 21. 28.; sup.-roy. fol. 41. 4h. Bds. Canterbury, med. 4to. 31. 3s. ; imp. .'il.Ss.; sup.-roy. fol. 1 11. Hds. Wells, with 24 Engravings, med.4to. 21. lOs. ; Imp. 41.4s.; sup.-roy. fol. 81. 88.; or with proofs and elcliiiips. IGl. 168. Exeter is in Progress. The ARCHITECTURAL ANTIOUl- TIES of (iRE.Vr BRITAIN. In 4'^'ol8. Med.lto. 211. ; or Imp. 4to. .•)21. half-bd, BEAUTIES of WILTSHIRE. Vol. III. with copious Indexes, X:c. ^c. a Map of the County, anil Ten Engrav- itiKs. Deiny Svo. II. 4». ; or on royal paper, 11. ll>8. Printed for Longman, liees, Orine, Brown, and Green. 50. ADVICE to a NOBLl'-MAN on Ihe Manner in wliich his Children should be instructed nii the I'iano-forte. With j.recise Directions as to their Mode of Practice , and many Lessons for playing that Instrument in the most finished style o( elegance ; with Observations on the new system of Musical Kdncation, and occasional lie- marks on Singing. The Third Editiou. 18mo. Handsomely done up. Price 39. 51. The ENGLISH FLORA. By Sir James E. Smith, President of the Linntean Society, &c. Sec. Vols. I. II. and III. Price 12s. each, Bds. ** These two vf>liinie!^ are cnniposcd with siicli an iiitiniatc knowledge of the siihjeel, with «uch an undeviaiiiip aim at accuracy, anu with sich an invariable respect for caiuloiir anil for Irulh, that wc look forward lo ihe completion of Ihe work a» an cvi nt of national importance to the science of botany."— Monthly Utvitw. Volnme IV. is nearly ready. *^* The Work will be completed in Five Volumes. By the same Author, A GRAMMAR of BOTANY, illus- trative of artificial, as well as natural Classification, with an Explanation of Jussieu's System. In 8vo. with 277 Fi- gures of Plants, and their various Parts and Organs. 2d Edit. 12s. ; or coloured plates, 11. lis. fid. COMPENDIUM FLORAE BRITAN- NICE. Price 7s. 6d. Fourth Editiou. An INTRODUCTION to the STUDY of PHYSIOLOGICAL and SYSTEMA- TICAL BOTANY. In 8vo. 5th Edit, with 15 Plates, Price 14s. plain ; or co- loured, 11. 8s. Bds. A SELECTION of the CORRES- PONDENCE of LINN^US, and other Naturalists. In 2 Vols. 8vo. U. 10s. Bds. .52. An ESSAY on the BENEFICIAL DIRECTION of RURAL EXPENDITURE. By R. A. Slanev, Esq. Barrister at Law. 1 Vol. 12mo. 6s. 6d. Bds. 53. SERMONS and CHARGES, by the Right Rev. Father in God Thomas FanshawMiddleton, D.D. late Lord Bishop of Calcutta; with Memoirs of his Life. ByHENV Kave BoNNEy, D.D. Archdeaconof Bedford. With Portrait, &c. 1 Vol. 8vo. 14s. bds. 54. The SHIP-MASTER'S ASSISTANT, and OWNER'S MA- NUAL ; containing general Information necessary for Merchants, Owners, and Masters of Ships, Officers, and all other Persons concerned or employed in the Merchant Service, rela- tive to the Mercantile and Maritime Laws and Customs. By David Stbei,, Esq. The l/th Edition, revised throughout, and brought down to the end of the Session of Parliament of the Year )82fi. The Commercial and Mathematical Department by Dr. Kelly, Author of the " Universal Cambist," and Mathematical Examiner of the Trinity House ; and the Legal Department by a Professional Gentleman. In 1 thick Volume of 1086 pages closely printed, with Maps, Plates, &c. Price 21s. Bds. or 22s. 6d. Bound. 55. REFLECTION. A Tale. ByMrs.HoFLAND, Author of the " Son of a Genius," &c.&c. 1 Vol. 12mo. Front. 6s. Bds. By the same Author, MODERATION. A Tale. Fron- tispiece. Price 6s. Bds. DECISION. A Tale. Frontispiece. 2d Edit. Price 6s. Bds. PATIENCE. A Tale. Frontispiece 2d Edit. Price 6s. Bds. INTEGRITY. A Tale. Frontis- piece. Price 68. Bds. 2d Edit. 56. A SYSTEM of UNIVERSAL GEOGRAPHY. By M. Malte Brun, Editor of the "Annales des Voyages," &c. Part X. Price 7s. 6d. Part XI. is in great forwardness. •»• The Work is to be completed in Fourteen Parts, forming seven Svo. Volumes. " M. Malte Brun is prohably known lo most of our readers as the Aullmr of a Systematic Work on OeoRrapliv ; he is besides the Edili>r of Nouvelles Annales des Voyages ; the first is as much superior lo the compilations of our Guthries and Pinkertons, as the other is to the garbled productions of our frus- Icrs and Wavors,"— tiuartc) 7y Review, Nu. bi. 10 Modern Publicationt, and Setc Editiom uf Valuable Standard fVurki 57. JOURNAL of a VOYAGE to BRAZIL, and RESIDENCE there, during Part of the Years l"*"-'!, lb"J2, and iK.'aj including an Account of tlie Uevolu- tlon uhidi brought about tlie Indejjendence uf the Bruziliuu Empire. I'y Maria Graham. In 1 Vol. 4to. witli Engravings. Price -'1. 2s. By the tame Author, JOURNAL of a RRSIDKNCE in MEMOIRS of the LIFE of MCHO- CHILK, and VOVAtiK from llie PA- LAS PUL'SSIN. In 8vo. Price 10s. Gd. CIKIC, in the Years 182*.' and lK.'3i pre- I Boards, with a Portrait, &c. ceded by an Account of the Hevoluttons I In Chile, since the Year iPlO, and parti- THREE MONTHS PASSED in the cularlyof the Trausatlions of the Squa- MOl'NTAIN.S EAST of ROME, in 181t>, dron of Chile under Lord Cochrane. In 1 yyo. with Six Plates, 10s. (id. Bds. Vol. Alo. with Engravings. Price 21. i .c-ttcuc ivt^i * o k ij i 123. (Jd. I LEITERS on INDl.A, 8vo. 14s. Bds 58. ELEMENTS of ALGEBRA ; compiled iVom Garnier's French Translation of Leonard Eulkb, and arranged so as to form a complete System of Elemen- tary Instruction in the First Part of Algebra. To which are added, Solutions of several Bliscellaneous Problems, with Questions and Examples for the Practice of the Student. By Charles Tavlkb, Downing College, Cambridge. 1 Vol. 8vo. Price 108.6d.Bds. 59. MEMOIRS of INDIA; comprising a Brief Geographical Ac- count of the East Indies ; a succinct History of Hindostan, from the most early Ages to the End of the Marquis of Hastings's Administration in 1823, designed for the Use of Young Men going out to India. By U. G. Wam.acf., Lieut. H. P. York Chasseurs, Author of " Fifteen Years in India." In 8vo. Price Us. Bds. 60. TRAVELS in BRAZIL, in the Years I8I7, 1818, 1819, and J823. Undertaken by the Command of His Majesty the King of Bavaria, and published under his special Patronage. By Dr. John Von Spix ; and Dr. Chai.es Von Martits, Members of the Royal Bavarian Academy of Sciences. Translated from the German. Vols. I. and II. 8vo. with Plates. Price 11. 4s. Bds. " The (ffnllcnieii fixed on for the Mission, appear, from the work biforc im, lo be adminhly quahfird for the purpose; and to have pursued tlie object of their journiy witli a zeal and dilnrei.cr rarely i<|ualli Jank Pokter. Dedicated, by the most gracioua PerinissloD, to His Majesty. In 'A \o\». ll'mo. Price 11. 48. Bds. By I ,e •am' Author, TH.\DDEUS of WARSAW, 3 Vols. The PASTOR'S FIRE-SIDE, in 4 iL'mo. lllb Edit. 188. Sa)TTISH CHIEFS, 4 Vols. 12mo. (ith Kdit 11. Il8. 6d. Bds. Volumes, 12mo. the Third Edition, Price 11. lls.6d. Boards. TALES ROUND A WINTER HKARTH. 2 Vols. K'lno. 1G». Uda. 72. A New Edition of the SAXON CHRONICLE, with an English Tninslation, iinil Notes, Critical and Explanatory. By the Rev. J. Ingram, late Saxon Professor in the University of Oxford. Tu which are added, a New and Copious Chronological, Topographical, and Glossarial Index, with a short Grammar of the Saxon Language. In 1 Vol. 4to. with an accurate and enlarged Blap of England during the Heptarchy, Plates of Coins, &c. Price 31. las. (id. Bds.; large paper, (il. ("is. Bds. 73. ACCOUNT of an EXPEDITION from PITTSBURGH to the KOCKV MOUNTAINS, performed in the Vear.-< lBly-20, hy Order of the Hon. J. C. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the Command of Major S. H. Long, of the United StateR Topographical Engineers. Compiled from the Notes of fitajor Long, Mr. T. Sav, and other Gentlemen of the Party. By Edwin J.\mes, Botanist and Geologist for the Ex- pedition. In Three Volumes, Octavo, illustrated with Maps and Plates. Pilce 11. lis. Bds. 74. TRAVELS, comprising Observations made during a Residence In various Parts of Savoy, seldom visited by British Tourists, particularly in the Pro- vince of the Tarentaisk, and the more Alpine Districts ; also in several of the Swiss Cantons, in the Years IBl'.l, 1820, and 1822. Including a Visit to Auvergne, and a De- scription of the extinct Volcanoes in the Vicinity of Clermont ; with Remarks on the present State of Society, Manners, and Religion, andon the Climate, Agriculture, and phy- sical Structure and Geology of these Countries. With a full and impartial Statement of the Circumstances, which render Geneva eligible or otherwise, as a place of temporary Re- sidence, or for the Education of English Vouth. By Robert Bakewell, Esq. In 2 Vols. 8vo. with Plates, and numerous Wood-cuts. Price U. fis. Bds. 75. FIRST STEPS to BOTANY, intended as popular Ilhistrations of the Science, leading to its study as a Branch of General Education. By Ja.mks L. DacMMoND, M.D. Professor of Anatomy and Physiology in the Belfast Academical Insti- tution. 2d Edit. In 12mo. with lUO Woodcuts, comprising 200 Figures. Price t»8. Bds. " This answers more compleiily lo the proper uoiion of au Introduction to Uolauy than any work m« ha\e fceeo.**— iif^clic HtvitWf Af^iU, 76. The ^lEDICAL GUIDE, for the use of the Heads of Families, the Clergy, and Vouug Practitioners ; embracing the latest Discoveries in Medicine, regard- ing the Properties of Remedies, and the Prevention, Treatment, Causes, and Nature of Diseases ; the Clothing, Feeding, Hie. of Infants ; means of counteracting the Effects of the different Poisons of the animal, vegetable, and mineral liingdoms ; and the Management of Accidents, Fits, &c. requiring immediate Assistance ; with a complete mortem Dispen- satory, &c. interspersed with cautionary Remarks to prevent a Blisapplication of the Reme- dies, Ac. By Ri( hard Rkkce, M.D. Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of London ; Corresponding Member of the Society of Practical Medicine of Paris, &c. &c. In 8vo. Price lOs. Cd. Bds. The 14th Edition, with Additions. liy the ftanie Aulhor, A PRACTICAL TREATISE on the MEANS of REGl'LATING the STO- MACH and BOWELS, by Medicine, Diet, Exercise, Ac. Ac. and securing the Con- stitution against the Inroads of the (irand Climacteric Disease, or Breaking up of Consti- tution. Second Edition. 8vo. Price 9s. Bds. 77. JOURNAL of a TEN MONTHS' RESIDENCE in NEW ZEALAND. By Ri( hard A. Cruise, Esq. Major in the 84th Regt. Foot. Second Edi- tion, 8vo. Price 10a. fid. Boards, with a Frontisi)iece. Major Cruise, durinn his Residence in New Zealand, maintained a constant Inter- course with the Inhabitants, and devoted much of his leisure to their Society, which afforded b'm full opportunity of observing their general Customs and Manners. Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, Broion, and Oreen. 13 78. PLAIN INSTRUCTIONS (o EXECUTORS and ADMINIS- TRATORS, shewing the Duties and Responsibilities incident to the due Performance of their Trusts; with Directions respoctinf? tlie Probate of Wills, and taking out Letters of Administration, &e. Ike. In a small 8vo. Volume. Second Edition. Price 5a. sewed. 79. SKETCHES of the LIVES of' CORREGGIO and PARME- OIANO. With Notes of their Principal Works. Beautifully printed in Post 8vo. with a Portrait. Price 10s. Gd. 80. A DESCRIPTION of the CHARACTER, MANNERS, and CUSTOBIS of tlie PKOPLE of INDIA, and their Institutions, Religious and Civil. Ry the Abbe J. Dubois. In One Volume, Quarto. Price 21. 2s. Boards. 81. "SYLVA FLORIFERA/' the " SHRUBBERY;" containing an Historical and Botanical Accountof the Flowering Shrubs and Trees, which now orna- ment the Shrubbery, the Park, and Rural Scenes in general. By Hbnky Phillips, F.H.S. Author of the History of Fruits, known in Great Britain, and the History of Cul- tivated Vegetables. In 2 Vols. 8vo. Price U. Is. Bds. 82. The only complete Editions of The REMAINS of HENRY KIRKE WHITE, selected, with prefatory Remarks, by Robert Southey, Esq. In 2 Vols. Price ."il. 4s. And in 5 Vols. 24mo. with engraved title and vignettes. Price 5s. Bds. N.li. The property of llic Family h;iviiiff beiti invaded, it is necessary to state, thai these are the on/y EUilions which eontaui Ihe Lite by Mr. Southey, and the whole of the contents of the Third Volume. Also may be had, separately. Volume the Third, of the first Edition. In 8vo. Price 9s. Bds. 83. ADVICE to YOUNG MOTHERS on the Physical Education of Children. By a Grandmother. In 1 Vol. 12mo. Price 7s. 6d. Bds. 84. SELECT WORKS of the BRITISH POETS, with Biogra- phical and Critical Prefaces ; being a Library of Classical English Poetry. By Dr. Aikin. In 10 Vols, post l8mo. Price 21. ; in royal l8mo, to match the British Essayists and Novelists, 31 ; and complete, in 1 Vol. 8vo. for Schools, &c. 18s. '* We have noticed with pleasure the appearance of a compilation, which claces before ns the best Poems of our best V the ^niuut laste, an as Ur. Aikin, The March f 1822, 85. REMARKS on the PRESENT SYSTEM of ROAD MAK- ING, with Observations deduced from Practice and Experience ; with a View to a Revision of the existing Laws, and the Introduction of Improvement in the Method of making, re- pairing, and preserving Roads, and defending the Road Funds from Misapplication. By John Loi'Uon M'Adam, Esq. General Surveyor of the Roads in the Bristol District. The Eighth Edition. In 8vo. Price "s. 6d. Bds. By the same Author, )ticed wilh pleasure the appearance oi a conipiianon, wuicn places oeiore us ine nest est Poets in a very accessible form ; and in the Selection of which we have the bent (it of , and critical abilities, of a gentleman so loni; and ^o usefully known to Ihe world of letters Ihe plan of the present Work is both comprehensive and judicious." — Hlont/ily Review, OBSERVATfONS on die MANAGE- MENT of TRUSTS for the CARE of TURNPIKE ROADS, as regards the Repair of the Road, the Expenditure of the Revenue, and the Appointment and Quality of Executive Officers; and upon the Nature and Effect of the present Road Law of this Kingdom, illustrated by examples from a practical experience of nine years. In 8vo. Price 6s. Bds. 86. CONVERSATIONS on CHEMISTRY. la which the Ele- ments of that Science are familiarly explained and illustrated by Experiments. In this Edition a Conversation has been added on the Steam Engine. The Tenth Edition, revised and improved, in 'J Vols. 12mo. with Plates by Lowry, 148. Bds. By the same Author, CONVERSATIONS on NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. 4th Edition, 13s. 6d. Bds. with 22 Engravings by Lowry. CONVERSATIONS on POLITICAL ECONOMY. Fifth Edition, in J2mo i^s. Bds. U Modern Publications, and New Editions of Valuable Standard Works, 87 NARRATIVE of a TOUR throuj?h the MOREA, giving an At count of the present State of that Peninsula and its Inhabitants. By Sir William Cell. In One Volume OLtavo, illustrated by Flutes, Wood Cuts, &c. Price Ss. BdH. 88 COXA'ERSATIONS on BOTANY, with Twenty-one Engrav- Inpg. The Fifth Edition, enlarged, in 1 Vol. 12mo. Price 7s. (id. plafn, or 1 2s. coloured. I Tlie object of thisWork is to enable young personc to acquire a knowledge of the vegetable productions of their native country ; for this purpose the arrangement of Mnn:eus is tiriefly explained, and a native plant of each class (with a few exccpti.ins' is examined, and illus- trated by an engraving; and a short account is added of some of the principal foreign species. 89. CONA^ERSATIOXS on MINERALOGY; with Plate.s, en- graved by Mr. and Miss Lowbv, from Original Drawings, comprising upwards of 4(K) Figures of Minerals, including 12 beautifully coloured Specimens. Second Edit, in 2 Vols. 12mo. Price Us. Bds. "The pUii of ihe are persons of the best learning, and the correctest taste, great admirers of the ancient languiiges, in their classical purity, and who are therefore not over-fond of English Lati- nity. They may, perhaps, give the hearing to a Parr or a Porson ; but such acts of condescen- sion they exercise with caution; and hence, " Quis leget heec ? . . . . Vel duo, vel nemo." Still the reflections were the result of no little thought, and some, it was hoped, of a useful tendency ; and, though this is not the first time I have attempted to write on certain academical matters, still, as it is likely to be the last, I wished to express myself with all possible ex- plicitness, and the utmost perspicuity. Indeed, I am not sure that the task of translation was not undertaken somewhat in a spirit of mortification, in a way of penance, as an amende honorable to English readers, for covering sentiments, which 1 am willing to hope are strictly British, with a foreign, Roman dress. To these reasons for the occasion of the pre- sent version, which are of a more general nature, may, perhaps, be added another, which is of a more particular and private one. The " History of the University of Cam- bridge," and " the Privileges*' are not to be con- sidered as complete narratives, nor as uniform c XXXVUl biographies, but rather as historical sketches, and loose tragments. Viewed as memorials, they were necessarily liable to tVequent, un- avoidable omissions ; throuiih the successive deaths of the members, requiring constant addi- tion.s; and, through the literary pursuits, the laws, the customs, the manners, the antiquities, exhi- biting regular intermixtures, and endless varie- ties. There are some writings, which in their very nature are miscellaneous; they appeal to the candour of those, for whose service they were more immediately intended, and do not admit of regular, systematic criticism. Such are those of our Woods, Lelands, and Hearnes; and there is no account of Cambridge beyond scraps and fragments. And, independently of all this, circumstances occurred in the way of the above works, very unfavourable to uniformity of desiirn, and com- pleteness of execution; and of this an account was given in an "Address to the Subscribers to the Privileges of the University of Cambridge,'' printed in 1823. "The Privileges of Cambridge" was, to speak the truth, not one of those compositions, for which are required as a whole, "A Beginning, a Middle, and an End ;" but rather a "Medley or Collectanea, or to take a modern phrase an Ana," which may follow as a rule (quite the re- verse of that laid down by Aristotle for a Trage- dy',) to begin, as "chance may direct, and to XXXIX finisli at the writer's pleasure:" it was brought together, as circumstances achnittecl, as oppor- tunities offered, as leisure and health allowed, and as utility might seem to require. But, after all due concessions, and acknow- ledged imperfections, it may be said, without the hazard of a contradiction, that the two works alluded to, when taken together, give such a view of the History and Constitution of the University, as had not been given before ; and that they contain more useful documents than are to be met with in any of its previous Histo- ries; which, indeed, is saying but little, where so little had been done. This little flourish of words, however, (as some may call it,) relating to the "Privileges of Cam- bridge'' would certainly not have been ventured on, but for the circumstance, which furnished another occasion for the following translation. A friend pointed out to me some time since, in a periodical publication, certain observations on the above-mentioned work, which proceeded, if I rightly recollect, on principles applicable only to regular, uniform, compositions, not to a col- lection of Charters and Statutes, to disjointed remains of academical antiquity, to mere no- tices, and memoranda for biography, with poe- tical sketches, and scraps of criticism ; in short, to a Collectanea, or Miscellanea Critica, a na- tural appendage to the History of a University, such as "the Privileges" professedly is. The writer, I think, allowed me (a generous c 2 xl concession truly, only made for insidious pur- poses) to possess a little of a tame sort of ho- nesty ; and this is more than I can allow hmi. For, when he says, he had exercised his patience by reading through the whole book, I am pretty confident he uttered an untruth. He pays a sort of compliment to mv Latinity, though at the expense of my English. Yet, whether he was competent to criticizing the " T)is^ertatio Generalh" OT not, 1 am confident, he never read it : for had he read it, and been competent to cri- ticizing it, such a critic would, no doubt, have made his attack, thouirh it had been only to show, that he possessed some little dexterity, as well as malignity : nor could hv have failed to censure the political part of it, which is the principal, the largest part, that, indeed, to which the literary is only preparatory : he strains an article of vulgar abuse out of my own con- cession : but I repeat with confidence, this lick- spittle critic ne\er read the " Dissertatio Ge- 7ie rails." He can return, then, to a task, which he left unfinished. The literature of the University he may venerate as much as he pleases ; he is not called upon to defend that : and, in the present case, merely pointing out blemishes in the wri- ter will only show his own feebleness ; vulgar abuse w ill but prove his cowardice : let him if he has courage and competency defend the sy- stem, which is here assailed ; or, if he has ho- nesty, let him concede, where he cannot defend. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chap. Page I. Introduction 1 II. Nature of the Privileges of the University of Cam- bridge 3 III. Ancient History deficient in faithful Chronicles . . 6 IV. Grecian Chronology 7 V. Roman History and Chronology 11 VI. Egyptian Chronology 13 VII. Hebrew Chronology ib. VIII. Comparison between the Hebrew and Egyptian Chronology 15 IX. Relation of the preceding Observations to the pre- sent Dissertation 17 X. Reply to certain Objections 18 XI. The History of Cambridge 20 XII. Appeal to the Candour of Cambridge-men 21 XIII. Censures which have been passed by some on our present Universities 22 XIV. Defence of our Universities made by others .... 24 XV. Greek and Latin Literature 25 - XVI. Defence of the Greek and Latin Languages .... 26 " XVII. Improvements made in the Universities 30 XVIII. Objections to the Study of the Mathematics j ac- companied with their Defence 32 XIX. Theology not to be defended by Mathematical Ar- guments 34 XX. Objections to certain Parts of the Mathematics, in the Way now taught at Cambridge 37 XXI. TheWriter's Apology for treating so freely on the Mathematics, and the Reasons for dwelling so long on Literary Subjects 39 XXII. On the Political or Economical State of our Uni- versities 40 XXIII. Men not to be blamed for examining ancient In- stitutionSj or even their own particular Com- 11 Chap. iminitieb : and may censure defects in them, Page without Disrespect to the existing Members. . 42 XX I \' Opinions of some Persons on the Political Cha- racter of our Universities 45 XXV. A (liferent Statement made of the Political Cha- racter of our Universities 4G XX\'l. Our University Courts regulated more according to the Forms of the Civil Law, than of the Com- mon Law of England 48 XX\'I1. Diti'ercnce between the Civil and Common Law ib. XX\'1I1. Incidental Allusions to certain Statutes, and to some other Matters of University Regimen, and to Controversies relating to them 50 XXIX. Further Considerations on the Civil Law, in the Polity of the University 53 XXX. On the Senate and Caj)ut 54 XXXI. Subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles 58 XXXII. .V Comparison made between the Modern and Ancient Subscriptio ns a nd O aths ... GO /^ XXXIII. Our Universities not'Lajvbuf'Ecclesiastical^Cor- porations (i7 XXXIV. Comparison between Modern English Universities, Foreign Universities, and Ancient Academies, with respect to Tests — Oaths G8 XXXV. On tl>e Political and Religious Character of James I. 76 XXX\'I. By what Rule James acted in ordering Subscrip- tions to his darlins .Articles 78 XXX\'II. Complaints, which may be urged by different Per- sons against this Practice of Subscription .... 79 XXX\'III. Honorary Degrees, and wherein they differ from Literary ones 81 XXXIX. The present enlightened times require an amelio- ration in our present Tests.— Mr. Tyrwhitt's Grace for abolishing Subscriptions 83 XL. QuiEre, as to tiic Riglit of admini'^toring the pre- sent Religious Test 85 XLI. On the Powers of the Senate and Heads 87 XLIl. Office and Duty of the Supreme Visitor 89 XLIII. A Parenthesis illustrative of some things which have preceded and which may answer the same purpose to what will follow 96 XLIV. Some Things in the Privileges, illegal in their Ori- gin, though since confirmed in the gross by Act • • • 111 Chap. of Parliament. Complaints of many Academics Pa^e against the present Polity. The real Querela Cantabrigiensis — which requires the Interfe- rence of the Supreme Visitatorial Power .... 98 XLV. History of Universities. — Short View of the Royal Statutes. — Alleviations of their literal Strictness 1 05 XLVI. Doubts, relative to the Right of abolishing Sub- scription 112 XLVll. The Meaning of certain Doctrinal Articles of the Church of England 117 XLVIII. On the Predestinarian Doctrines contained in the Thirty-nine Articles 121 XLIX. Wherein absolute Predestination differs from the Philosophical Necessity, whether of the An- cients or Moderns 1 24 L. On Titles, and the Writer's opinion concerning them 126 LI. On Degrees 132 LII. On the RelativeValue of Degrees ; the Advantages and Distinctions which they give in Civil So- ciety, and more particularly in the Universities 138 LIII. A few Objections to the Removal of Subscription, at the Time of taking Degrees in any of the Fa- culties, considered 155 LIV. Testimonies of learned Men, Members of the Uni- versity, against our present Subscriptions .... 168 LV, Forged Charters 177 APPENDIX I. Recent Improvements in the Academical Studies of Cam- bridge 1 85 APPENDIX II. Forms of Civil Law in the University Courts 188 APPENDIX III. Duke of Grafton, late Chancellor of the University and Noble Foreigners 190 APPENDIX IV. Dr. Paley 191 ERRATA. Preface; page xvii. line 20, dele Northampton, and insert, line 22, " the Methodists also have similar Institutions." p. xxx. /. 17, dele and p. 12, Z. 23, after than, insert //lose p. 48, I. 8, after various, add persons p. 77, for morals, read religion p. 127, should be 12y, &c. to the end p. 145, should be 143. GENERAL DISSERTATION, cjc. ADDRESSED TO THE GENTLEMEN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. -«»■ I. hitroduct'ion. rACTS which are derived from ancient writings, claim their peculiar prerogatives ; and it suits not their gravity to be contaminated with certain modern practices ; such as are exhibited in some of our De- dications, which are too connnonly inflated with flat- tery, and grow wanton with the hope of gain : besides, neither does the present argument admit of such forms, nor does the present occasion require them. He who addresses you is no celebrated author of some original work, nor is he one of the host of compilers, but an Editor only : nor are ye men, willing to be taken, as with birdlime, by the artifices and mere blandish- ments of words. Let Rhetoric have its privileges — of enticing men's ears with the smoothness of its phrases, of striking with the splendour of its figures,and, at the same time, of diverting princes and other great men from their ordinary pursuits : — let Logic, also, be allowed its pri- vileges — of encompassing itself with subtle distinc- tions, of making artificial far-fetched syllogisms, and, in its eagerness for victory, rather than for truth, like the B S{)j)liists ineiitloned by Plato, of making the less ap- pear the greater cause. Let also Poetry be allowed its liberty— of abounding with delicious thoughts, of being luxuriant in fictions, and of bearing away the admiration of all mankind ; since the Muses, as the ancient poets are accustomed to talk, have a license for acting to the full extent of their powers. Lastly, let its proper province be claimed for Hi- story, one more luminous, but at the same time more sober, and more full of authority. Let it in matter be weightv, in reflection serious, in words not redun- dant and lavish, but, like one who points the way to a traveller by his finger, let it rather be stored with examples entitled to credit, and with things worthy of remembrance, than with fictitious arguments and frivolous ornaments. Let this be considered as its immediate office, — to recall past times and past events, and to place them before the eyes ; nor should it be debarred from amusing and delighting, so it be with moderation: but principally, and agreeably to its very profession of relating facts, let its object be, to pro- fit and to instruct ; nay, even when mixing profane with sacred things, — for antiquity in its earliest re- ports has many fables, — to draw out the very strength and marrow, as it were, of words ; to search after truth, and, if it possibly can, to find it ; and, while giv- ing support to truth, to unfold it; to consult rather the public interest than private ; the convictiofi of the wise, than the credulity of the vulgar, and the benefit of future times, than the vanity of living patrons. Such are the points, which should be kept in view, and attained by History ; such its supreme laws ; other- wise, while affecting to appear a searcher after real facts and ancient manners, or of being a guide to philosophy, to virtue, and religion, it must appear to be altogether counterfeit, or a babbler, at once empty and profane. II. Natin-e of " The Privileges of Cambridge^'' With regard to these poor attempts, they can scarce- ly be considered as even fragments of Histories ; but with respect to you, Gentlemen of the University, the editor feels pleasure in presenting them, such as they are, with due humility to you : and he beseeches you not to treat them rashly, nor to consider them of no account ; but that you would receive them, in some sort, with the same benevolence and liberality, with which you are accustomed to foster the labours of your fellow- collegians, and, indeed, as some of your members formerly treated his : and the more the ob- scurity of his name may sink their value, or diminish their weight, so much the more let the splendour of your own names yield them support, and give them a useful tendency. It appeared to the editor, — to speak freely his mind, — that there existed many reasons for presenting these " Privileges" to you : not, because having been formerly fostered in the bosom of Cambridge Uni- versity, and now, at length, returning to it, he would with too much confidence, and with a species of ar- rogance, demand admittance to our ancient Alma Mater, seize her, as it were, with too much famili- arity, and expect in return that she should embrace him and his as her sweetest treasure, after the man- ner in which a former Greek professor, Joshua Barnes, once flattered himself : " The venerable Granta call'd me son : Yoii are my fathers, and I call you so ; And now present you with my own dear child." b2 lie kiiow.s liiiuself better : and calling to iniml cer- tain opinions of his, which are not now formed for the first time, and which were never propitious to him, together with his manners and habits, wiiich are so little academic ; being, indeed, one who has started aside from his central point of the l^niversity into circuitous regions, — recollecting all this, he can ap- proach you only with the language of your poet, Cowley ; " Oh ! Motlicr, feel towards me no stepdame's hate ; Be not thou cruel, but leave that to fate." But what shall he say ? AMien some Genius, whether good or bad, — for he knows not what to call it, — first suggested to him, as if whispering in his ear, that these papers should be submitted to you, he was for some time in doubt : he reflected at how great a distance the pursuits of his life threw him from such attempts ; and, indeed, that nothing should be offered to you, but what was wrought up with ge- nius, and replete with learning : yet this same Genius, or whatever it may be called, — so disinclined was he to the task, — seemed to urge him, as though a voice issued from some oracle, that reasons in abundance were favourable to the design, and that nothing, in- deed, forbade it ; for that, in fact, they had in view no private interest ; that they came forward with no personal compUiints ; that they aimed to provoke no theological or political disputes ; that no honours were sought after ; no rewards expected; and, in short, that every thing here related to yourselves ; that what was strictly your own property was but returning to you ; and, that what thus aimed to approach you with re- spect, you would not dismiss from you with illibera- lity. And, indeed, that this little work is not unworthy of your names, nor unsuited to your offices, nor fo- reign to your studies, appears on the very face of it ; being, as it were, a dish of various sorts of fruits, but exhibiting nothing either of a trifling character, or of an unprofitable tendency. It yields a strong flavour of antiquity ; is now for the first time spread open for every one's inspection ; presents to your eyes the dis- cipline of our ancestors ; brings out the arcana of our University, thoroughly examined, and seriously corrected, as they have been, by learned men ; arranged, too, in proper order for every one's use : in short, what- ever may be thought of the character of the work it- self, and whatever, you yourselves being the judges, ot some of the laws and institutions of the University, promulgated therein, still are they to be confirmed and proved by the testimony and authority of these same learned men. That to Cambridge-men, particularly if residing at Cambridge, this book will have its uses ; and with re- spect to others, not residing there, will assist their re- collections, — who will deny ? It calls to mind what is past ; it places in a clear point of view what is pre- sent; to those proposing to investigate what is little known it will render aid ; to those particularly wish- ing at any time to investigate the History of Cam- bridge critically and attentively, it will afford the greatest pleasure and the most solid advantage : for from this spring the whole history of Cambridge is, in fact, derived ; which if you pass by with neglect, where will you find any thing better or more sure ? Nay, in passing by that, truth is immediately lost sight of: you would search for mere cisterns ; and should you find any, they would be empty or broken, which can hold no water, — nothing, in short, but mo- nastic frauds, and historiettes of fables. This volume is entitled, "The Privileges of the Uni- versity of Cambrielge," as relating to its Rights and Laws ; and with no impropriety might have been called, Annals, Chronicles, Fasti, or any other name, more relating to history. For the said volume may be taken as an Historical Index, or Directory, or Uni- versity Register ; and, as you know, true chronicles are the sure clue to history. III. Ancient History deficient in faithful Chroriicles. ^\'hence is it, that ancient history, as well among the Northern and European nations, as among the Asiatics, overflows every where with coarse deceptions and fabulous prodigies '^. Is it not, because being led astray by genealogical, mythological, and astrological fancies, it hurries on wildly without faithful guides, running every where and at random through inconstant vortices and lawless excursions ? Hence the supersti- tions, and perverse institutions, of the Druids ; at least according to Csesar. " Nor do they — the Druids — think it lawful to commit their customs to writing, though in their other concerns, whether of public or private consideration, they commonly use Greek let- ters." The same writer, speaking of the Gauls, ob- serves: *' They all proclaim themselves to be sprung from Pluto as their father ; which account, as they say, they received by tradition from the Druids." Hence, in like manner, among the Greeks, — to whom, not- withstanding tlve arts and sciences are so much in- debted, — that load of fables, — under which, we must confess, lie buried some serious truths, — that massy heap of devices, running from Ouranos down to Ulys- ses, as it was made up by the Cyclic and Cyprian j)oet.s, as they are called, though now, their writings, I with the exception of a few fragments preserved by iVoclus, are entirely lost. The truth is, none of these people had annals, or, whatever they had of the kind, was so covered over with traditions, that genuine facts were quite lost sight of : History becomes, as it were, a mere wilderness ; and, should we ever so wish to hunt after truth, we should, — as the proverb speaks, — miss the game. With respect to the Grecian states — the people of Athens, indeed, made their boast, that they surpass- ed, by a great distance, all the others in antiquity : and they, perhaps, said what was true ; since they, on account of the narrow limits of their country, the barrenness of the soil, the rare occurrence of sedi- tions and emigrations, had always, — to use their own language, — been possessed of that country. Thus, at least, this eloquent, this inventive people, these ori- ginal inhabitants of the soil, as they called themselves, gave out in their own behalf. Hence it was, that the ancient Athenians used to bind their hair with grass- hoppers made of gold : for the further they could ap- peal to antiquity, the deeper they were involved in mystery ; the more they pretended to be investiga- tors of their own history, the more they proved them- selves to be inventors of fallacies, and believers of old wives' stories. IV. Grecian Chronology/. Nor, indeed, was Herodotus, the father of history, as he is called, nor Homer, the father of poetry, the first who fabricated and gave out these fictions, — though Herodotus himself does most foolishly ascribe them to Homer and Hesiod. It is, indeed, true, that 8 Homer did not set these matters riglit: nor, indeed, ciccording to the opinion of Fred. Aug. AVolfius, could lie, because, as tlie same 'W'ollius states, tlie (ireeks had not in Homer's time attained the promjit facuhy, and ready familiar use, of letters, either in reading or writing : and in such-like testimonies, he does but, — as the proverb speaks, — water his own gardens from Josej)hus's springs. It might be wished, that this most celebrated man, W'olfius, luid l)een as consi)icuous in his Latinity, as he was luminous in talent, and profoimd in learning : it may be thought too by many, that some of his opi- nions concerning Homer, and the tardy progress and prompt use of alphabetic writing among the Greeks, incline somewhat to heterodoxy, though to us they appear to possess some trutli : but be these things as they may, if in those observations made by him on the common use of the art of writing he is not al- together erroneous, what conclusions are to be drawn on some other matters is pretty plain. With respect to the Greeks, then, the case seems to stand thus : This people, at the first, made certain inscriptions on stone and wood : but even this was done later, than some suppose. The most ancient of all the inscriptions, — we are speaking only of the Greeks, — as mentioned by Herodotus, Aristotle, and Pausanias, if we choose to follow the above-mention- ed writer, are later than the age of Homer ; so far were the Greeks, according to him, of having any thing like annals. ^\'ith respect to Greek Marbles, we have in Eng- land two remains of venerable antiquity ; of which, one, — called the Sandwich Marble, — belongs to the members of Cambridge University ; the other, — the Parian Chronicle,— to the University of Oxford: botli 9 far later in antiquity than the Sigean: the former, namely, the Sandwich Marble, is oklor, perhaps, by a hundred years, than the latter, the l^arian Chro- nicle ; and what is written on it is of a much later date than the inscriptions just mentioned ; and to our present subject it but little appertains, —contain- ing an Athenian Bill of Charges for the sacred Feast at Delphos. But the Arundelian Marble is professedly a Chro- nicle ; beginning with Cecrops, 1582, though not engraved till 26',^ years, before Christ, according to Selden, long after Homer. We are, indeed, not igno- rant, that some hold the authority of this Parian Chro- nicle to be but small, nay who consider it altogether spurious ; nor, whether it may be spurious, or genuine, has it with our business much concern. Its fidelity we at least by no means assert. It is sufficiently fa- bulous : and, at the same time, contradicts, by its statements, that arch-mystographist, Apollodorus : and as to Apollodorus himself, as the Cyclic writers were fabulous in verse, so was he, — running from Ouranus down to Theseus, — in prose. Whence then was this Chronicle, be it what it may, derived ? From others, perhaps, of a superior iige. Do you ask, whence these latter were obtained? We reply, not from writings, of which the Grecians had little knowledge ; but from what greatly preceded all their chronicles, from the traditions of antiquity, and the dreams of their poets : so that Greece, ignorant of its own history and common origin, but endued with a genius pre-eminently subtle, and, imbued, at length, with the arts and sciences of the Egyptians, as it did not want the will, so did it not the power, of fabrica- ting almost every species of invention. Hence sprang that saying of Pliny concerning the Greeks, "There is no lie so impudent, which cannot be borne out by 10 their te>tiinony ;" a saying whidi at length passed into a proverb, " \\halcvor lying Grc(.'ce Durst give for genuine History." — Juv. The most ancient Greek MSS. which have come to the knowledge of the learned, and which have been accurately examined by them, reach not, in the opi- nion of the most sagacious inquirers into these sub- jects, perliaps, beyond the third century, if so far ; we add, perhaps, for we should not speak of that as a certainty, which is only a probability ; — nor is the age of the Greek language concerned in this dis- pute. The question concerning the origin of the Greek alphabet is, indeed, curious, as also is the history of its progress. It is also of considerable length, and be- yond the limits of our present investigation : though we may be allowed to conjecture, that if it was derived from Cadmus, that is, a Phoenician origin, — and that it was so, is very clearly manifest from that most cele- brated, and ancient Sigean inscription, — it would not follow, that Greek annals nmst be traced to the same source. For, if the Greek mythology was in part of foreign extraction, their annals, had they possessed any, would of necessity have been their own. In the mean time, it does not escape us, that there are writers, particularly some Platonists, who are disposed to give to Fables themselves a moral and theological, as well as a natural and animal, inter- pretation, speaking as philosophers ; nay, who are pleased to receive them as divine : nor do we mean to disj)ute with such philosophers, nor to pronounce, as from a professor's chair, that they are, totu calo, in a mistake, — this only being granted us, that where mythologies most abound, there faithful annals will be proportionably less : and, that the fact is so, the 11 course of history very clearly proves : for — and be it observed, that we are not speaking of mythologists, properly so called — even their historians, while treating of matters of antiquity, while professing to give clear narratives of what is past, nay, when desiring to point out the events of their own times, — in short, whatever they attempt, present their readers with little else than reports from ancient tradition, or the results of their own observation and experience ; but they make no appeals to faithful monuments, they gain no credit from chronological arrangement, they confirm nothing from the authority of books antecedent to their own times. Such is the course pursued by their historians; so that, when they write of things which occurred in their own times, and under their own eyes, — being accustomed to proceed in this way from a want, from an ignorance, of annals, — they report nothing from calendars or registers of former times, but every thing is done, if not quite confusedly, yet without any chronological harmony. y. Homan History and Chronology . The preceding observations relate to the Grecians; and much the same must be made on the Romans. And, indeed, how can it be otherwise.^ Had not the two people the same alphabet, the form, the num- ber, the expression being nearly the same .^ Almost every thing of these as possessed by the Roman language, is common to the Greek, and affords a proof, that they are of one family, that they had a common parent. To every learned person this will be clear, on comparing together the Characters of the Beza MS. — that most ancient Greek MS. of the four Gospels and Acts of the Apostles in the public li- brary of the University of Cambridge — with the 12 Latin corresponding to them, and placed at the side ; or the Copies of those most celebrated MSS. of X'irgil — Fac Sifui/es as they are called — in the \'atican andMedicean Libraries compared with Greek MSS. Though, indeed, all the ancient Greekand Latin MSS. betray a wonderful affinity one with another, at hast those which are written in capital letters, — as those of the greatest antiquity all are, — most clearly proving, that the original characters of both languages were derived from the same Oriental source. IJesides, the same mythology was common to both nations, as will appear on comparing but cursorily the Scriptores Grcrvi anlK^ui Ilistorite Pott'iccr^ and the Theogony of Hesiod, with the Metamorphosis of the Roman fabulist, Ovid. Did not, too, the arts and sciences, as the best and most accomplished judges have de- cided, flourish later with the Romans, than with the Greeks .^ Nay, were not the Romans borrowers from the Greeks ? and did not the use of letters obtain a later introduction among the Romans .^ To which let it be added, that the early computa- tions in the Roman History are little more to be relied on than in the Grecian. It has been deemed surpri- sing, that the most striking, and primary epoch in the history of the Romans, — the time of building their city, — should not have been more clearly ascertained, there being no less than seven opinions among the critics on that subject : on this a learned and grave writer suggests, "that it might have surprised us more had it been otherwise, considering either the darkness of their history, or the unequalness and irregularities of their computations." In truth, what has been said of the Greeks, may in some measure be said of the Ro- mans, — their History comes before their Chronology, and the early part of it is a mere fable. I -13 y VI. Egyptian Chronology . • But let us take heed, lest we founder in the very port. Perhaps, the Egyptians and Asiatics managed these matters hetter. About the Chald?cans thereis itoo little certainty of information : the spurious Be- ji'osus is no less fabulous : and what is related of the Phoenicians, and ascribed to Sanchoniathon, is equal- ly fallacious. But, indeed, there are some, and those well versed in antiquarian research, who, fol- lowing the Greek and Latin writers, have been stre- nuous in referring to the Egyptians the first prin- ciples of knowledge, and also the commencement of the use of letters and writing, as derived, according to them, from the hieroglyphics : as if that people, as Horapollo says of their country, produced and ani- mated all things. They maintain, that the Egyptians, on account of the peculiarities of their soil, and the periodical overflowings of the Nile, carefully studied astronomy, and were the first who invented the year, which they divided into twelve months, from obser- vation of the zodiacal signs, of thirty days, with five ad- ditional ones every year. They add, that as, from these causes, the Egyptians became the most accurate ob- servers of periods of time, so also, through a long series of dates they were the most faithful chroniclers of events : and that, as to sacred and mystic matters, not only did the Greeks borrow their deities from Egypt, but the Hebrews also took from them their nu- merous rites and ceremonies : so that in this nation at least, they might say, the abundance of mythology was not that, which occasioned a defect in their chro- nology. VII. Hebretv Chronology. Such are the things, which we find related of the Egyptians : but no small number of the learned, and 14 niunv tlu'ologians, unless we are much mistaken, both Jewish and Christian, have lield a very dill'erent opi- nion. These, deriving every thing from the Hebrews, maintain, that, as tlie ancient h\ngiiage of the Phoeni- cians was the same as that of the Hebrews, so also the ancient Hebrew letters were the same as the Phoeni- cian ; that the Egyptians were large borrowers from them, imitating their modes and manners, though but as children do those of men. — They hold, that we must look to Moses for the origin of letters, as first revealed on Mount Sinai, and described by the hand of Jehovai), proceeding from that light which could not be looked upon — from the fiat, " Let there be light, and there was light"- — being evidently — they are ChishuH's words — " of divine workmanship and invention, and worthy of that almighty God, who fashioned our mind, face, and eyes." Moreover, according to the opinion of many of the learned, an opinion immediately connected with this last, the Jews have the most authentic chronicles and the most faithful historical records. In the Hebrew annals, therefore, they think, they can make a sure footing : and, in fixing the festivals, the generations of the patriarchs, the sojourning of the Israelites in Egypt, the years of the Judges, nay even the creation of the world, they produce a Sacred Chronology — as Archbishop Usher and Petavius the Jesuit do — from the very beginning, as a faithful guide, a rule or re- gister of dates, and, setting mythology aside, as the sure and only elucidation of ancient history : ....♦' Veritatem Dumos inter et aspera Scopulosis seciiti vadis." 15 VIII. Comparison betiveen the Hebrews and Egyptians . So these proceed. Others take a different course : for there are some, and those no common men, but writers of great repute, who maintain, in opposition to all this, that the Hebrews derived almost every thing from the Egyptians. They assert that there was a striking agreement between them and the Egyp- tians, in their tenets of belief, in the precepts which directed their actions, in various rites and cere- monies ; and, what is more to the purpose here, as connected with chronology, in their division of the year, months, and days, both the Israelites and the Egyptians having a double year, civil and sacred, — and many other marks of similarity closely connected with this question. At all events, it appears certain beyond doubt, that we must come to one of two conclusions, — either that the Egyptians were, if we may so say, Hebraized, or that the Hebrews were Egyptianized. So Kircher holds : and many Chris- tian theologists agree that It must be so : nor are the learned Jews desirous or able to disprove it. But whatever may be the belief of the learned on these points, we cannot directly, of necessity, and, as it were, in argumentative series, hence draw settled con- clusions regarding the Hebrew chronicles. Wlmt has just been said of the Greeks, may almost equally be said of the Israelites : namely, that though they bor- rowed some rites and ceremonies from the Egyptians, their chronicles were necessarily peculiar to them- selves : and if the Egyptian chronology be false and erroneous, it will not thence follow that the Hebrew annals are destitute of truth. This could by no IC means be rightly asserted. The premises maybe good, and yet tht conclusion miglit be false. If we are to put faith in the Jews, what is to be said of the other Asiatics, and of the Egyptians . themselves? If the chronicles of tlie former are to beS admitted as genuine and worthy of credit, those of the latter must necessarily be rejected as false. If , one proceed in the straight line of truth, and the : other turn in obliquity from it, as each takes a con- , trarv course, they can never both meet in harmony. In the outset, what discrepancies are found in their ; registers ! In their progress, what discord in their dates ! What an amplitude and extent in the liistory i of j)articular events and single reigns — immense, and almost infinite, far exceeding the bounds- of the Mo- saic account! If yet, notwithstanding all this, from a i very remote period they were acquainted with letters, — and that they were, all antiquity testifies, — if tliey mulerstood the zodiac, and knew the planetary move- ments ; if they possessed all the materials and helps of chronology, and if they a: pointed their priests as the depositaries to guard their sacred writings, — and such advantages have been the boast both of the Chaldeans and Persians, as well as the Indians and Egyptians, — what is to be said ? You will reply, ''Onuie ignottnn pro niag/tijico.'''' That on the above-mentioned points much of the inconsistency and contrariety of opinion has arisen from an ignorance of the most ancient languages, is well known to every academic : of the ancient Egyp- tian — we do not speak of the Cojjtic — and of the Babylonic not a tittle is known ; and, perhaps, not much of tlie hieroglyphic Doubtless you do not forget, that those who treat of Egyptian and Chal- daic matters take very different parts ; maintaining. 17 that the Egyptian letters, inscribed on the pyramids — at least as Herodotus relates — either never exist- ed, or entirely vanished in later times ; that Chaldaic astronomy savoured more, perhaps, of astrology, as it is called, and imposture, than oi science: and, if it be admitted, tliat there is a certain correspondence and agreement between the ancient cosmogonies, Chaldaic, Egyptian, Persian, Indian, Greek, and He- brew, that still their chronologies vary from each other, and are as difl'erent as possible from the Hebraic. To some, who of late explored Oriental history with great industry, and, perhaps, some success, it has ap- peared probable, after all, that the great periods of time and far-extended histories of the Indians and others, are little more than the revolutions of the sun, the moon, and the planets. IX, Relation of the preceding Observations to the present Dissertation. But on these points enough : and having, perhaps, transgressed our bounds, we ask pardon. We hope we shall be excused by academics for turning over these matters, so well known to most of them; not mentioned, indeed, so much for their sake, as for the purpose of refreshing our own memory, and as a check against too much forwardness. Indeed, they insi- nuated themselves into our mind gradually, though not unawares, in a natural sort of order, as it appears to us, whilst meditating on the present subject, rather than hastily babbling at a venture, or busying our- selves in useless and ostentatious researches. Let then the statements above be taken for ex- amples, that in proportion as the chronicles of ancient nations were more defective, their histories neces- sarily more abounded in fabulous tales ; and, that the c 18 iiioie authentic and belter proved the chronological materials are, which we possess, so much the deeper will the foundations of true history be laid, so mucli the more majestic the superstructure, which maybe raised; the better will all the parts fit and be jointed together; the examples will be safe and encouraging ; the de- scriptions — not unlike the natural ornaments of edi- fices — clear and beautiful : the whole structure will not be artificial, or dangling, as it were, in the air, but duly and firmly fixed as by some binding law of nature, Truth herself having laid the first stone : and — to return, at length, to what more immediately con- cerns our present business, — while meditating the right way to Cambridge History, we have ourselves been taught thereby, and shall continue to be taught, that it is to be derived from those true chronicles, which are preserved in your own archives ; and that we, in presenting to your fidelity this " Book of Privileges," wholly derived from them, shall make, at least to those Cantabrigians, who either now are, or may here- after become, curious about the History of Cambridge, an agreeable and useful offering. X. licphj to art am Objections. But, in truth, we fancy, that we hear some starting objections against us in the very outset — that our hopes are disproportionate to our matter — that those are grasping and largely extended, while this is slen- der, little adapted for common use, and more than re- quisitely academic. But we hope it will not prove altogether so. We freely confess, that what we have to offer are but brief notes, or memoranda, marking only points of time, and not, like the Annals of Ta- citus, or the Commentaries of Caesar, giving a full and ample narration: yet still are they such points, from 19 \\'hich, as a centre, all true histories are drawn, which strike off into the right direction, and take a wide range ; they are of small pretensions, diminutive, even I in appearance, yet they bear with them the most use- 1 ful records, the most uncorrupted evidences, so as to be the clearest and the strongest vouchers. They may, indeed, if you like, be called a key, small and un- polished, but which, in the hands of those who know how and when to apply it properly, will open the most directly to the greatest opportunities and surest advantages. Nor can it with justice be objected, that these records are not ancient enough to be valuable, like wine, which has more flavour of the wood than of age : for they are most assuredly ancient ; nay some of them, of which we shall give a longer account elsewhere, claim to be older than some of the learned would like, perhaps, to admit. We shall not, on the pre- sent occasion, trouble ourselves with the controversies of Caius of this University, or of Twine and Antony Wood of Oxford, in their disputes about the very early antiquity of the Universities of Cambridge and Oxford. We shall be satisfied with what Crevier says of the Academy of Paris: *'Il n'est pas possible de fixer par des dates precises les commencemens, soit de rUniversite de Paris en general, soit de parties qui la composent, des magistrats qui la gouvernent, des principaux attributs qui la caract^risent. Les re- serches sur tons ces points ne menent en aucune facon a une origine claire et determinee ; et les premieres mentions que Ton rencontre dans les monumens his- toriques, n'en contiennent point la creation et I'eta- blissement, mais en supposent I'existence." The same, or very nearly so, may be said of our University of Cambridge. The first charter, indeed, which can be c2 •JO considered true and genuine, clearly appears of the time of Henry the Third. This is still kept in the Tower of London. If any can be produced of an older date than this, we sh(Hild like to see it brought forward. But, this by the bye, and let it suffice : for from this pe- riod the stream of the Charters and Privileges of Cam- bridge flows clear and pellucid, confined within cer- tain bounds and hanks ; and if this be not the ex- treme line and limit, it can nowhere be marked to a certainty. Upon the charters and statutes themselves, whether royal, papal, or academical, we cannot at pre- sent make anv nice disquisitions : some will not be reckoned of any sterling worth, at least by those who think with us : others, on account of the matter itself, will not be much valued by men of sense ; in- deed, not at all, unless, perhaps, as affording some aid to history. Such as are now in use and refer to more modern customs, may, probably, render assist- I ance to those filling public offices ; and such as are no longer observed, and, from a change in times and manners, are now neglected and suffered to fall into disuse, may still gratify the curious, who delight in collecting the fragments of ages gone by. If some are of an uncouth diction, and of a style, necessarily, more official than classical, many, nevertheless, as might be expected, are of a better vein, and having received a more careful polish from very learned men, possess such a spirit of elegant Latinity, that they may please and delight men of the most refined taste. XJ. TJif History of Ca?/i bridge. And here, if we take occasion to speak a few words — perhaps we may say more elsewhere — about our History of Cambridge, we hope you will pardon us. 21 Additions and corrections pertaining to it are sub- f joined to this vohnne. We confess we have erred in some points : and, in sucli a variety of matter, that we should have sometimes erred, who can wonder ? IThose possess a right of censure, vvlio are fitted by [learning to correct or assist others ; and to those learned men, who kindly admonish their fellow-la- jbourers of their errors, the higiiest respect is due. As for those, who from malice, or a vp.ln opinion of themselves, or for purposes of gain, are ever eager to attack others, let them enjoy the gratification which their censures can give them ; — a pitiful set of fellows, who the less they have of genius, or learning, or industry, or love of truth, or love of liberty, are !the more desirous of giving themselves consequence by their garrulity and petulance ; — " Let such stay at I Jericho, till their beards are grown." By such men land their devices we shall not suffer ourselves to be i detained, hastening on, as we hope we are, to better I matter. XII. Appeal to the Candour of Cambridge-men. Doubtless, there will be among you, gentlemen of the University, — as we certainly know there have been, — many of a more penetrating judgment, men more studious of good morals, than covetous of emoluments, and of a genius so much the more li- beral and candid, as they are more conversant in these studies ; friends to the University of Cambridge, and to mankind at large, rather than lovers of themselves, who might be considered very honourable opposers — if they chose to oppose at all — who in more serious mood may object to us, having, perhaps, formed some apprehensions, that ensnared by the love of the pre- sent undertaking, or with too much reverence for you, 22 we are about to become unseasonable and extravagant panegyrists of what deserves no praise ; nay, to turn admirers of some things, entitled to censure : evi- dently forming their opinion by comparing what has been said elsewhere, as they think, sufficiently com- mendatory, with what the title of the present work, "The Privileges of Cambridge," may seem to promise. It is, therefore, our wish to treat of those same things as in their presence : and if, through being limited by the narrowness of the times ; if through being confused by different opinions of different men, who have gone over the same course, — we seem to feed a controversy, or to entertain any doubt, we shall leave it to such men's sober and candid decision. Contentions and barking disputations are but little to our taste : but, as to search after truth *' in the groves of Acade- mus" could formerly give us pleasure, so now, at length, to find it there would be our great delight. It is proposed, then, to consider the present sub- ject, — the Privileges of Cambridge, — in a series of ob- servations on its present constitution, its literature, its charters and statutes, and to take a more particular view of some things which concern the discipline and economy of that body, as parts of our civil com- munity, in reference to the theory of the English Con- stitution, and to the guardianship and direction of the British Government. XIII. Censures which have been passed by some on our present Universities. In the first place, then, it does not escape us, that there have been, and are still, persons, who have much censured such kind of institutions as those now under consideration, at least so far as they are privileged and exclusive establislunents, such as are now those long Zo established in the two counties of Oxford and Cam- bridge. Such men there certainly have been ; and their opinion was formed, if we properly understand them, not from the little regard which they had for science, but from their great desire to see it more generously amplified, and more widely extended ; and further, from their thinking, that such-like pri- vileged institutions favour rather some private, than a public, interest ; the studies peculiar to parties and professions, rather than those arts, which for their liberality and general efficiency should be called the best : but — as they were wont to pro- fess — they were so far from feeling a love for igno- rance, and a reverence for rusticity, that they could have wished to see elegant literature honoured in every place, philosophy rendered accessible, in some measure, to every individual, and colleges raised and established in all the greater cities of Britain. The precedingobjections, then, against Universities, have been urged against them not as literary institu- tions, but as too privileged ; — not as insusceptible of much real good, but as in their present state, too re- stricted and confined for the public benefit. There may, perhaps, be among you, some ready to say, that this is a picture of a mere monster, the abortion of some unfortunate, diseased times; or a little more politely, a mere new Atlantis, or Utopia. Be it so : this is not the place — whatever our opinion may be — to agitate the question : suffice it, for the present, to have hinted, that such opinions have been thrown out, and by some of your own members, and even pro- claimed at St. Mary's, your own church. But, as some will rejoin ; all this was in tumultuous times, when there is apt to be a certain rush into contro- versies, according to each man's prevailing bias, a 24 conflict of all sorts of opinions ; and it would be strans:e, if amidst these tumults, inconsistencies did not arise, and extravagancies even abound. But, to say the truth, in more tranquil times, — even in our own, — and among those, than whom you will scarcely find any persons more attached to you, there have existed men, who, no less than those just men- tioned, have thought, that our founders would have better consulted the interest of the l^ritish state, in the establishment and proper direction, as well of good learning, as of morals and true religion, had they provided, that the Light and Sacrid Cf/ps now appropriated to these favoured institutions, should have been more widely and extensively diffused, even through all the counties of England ; rather than, as they now are, disposed of, as it were, in a corner, and circumscribed within the limits of one or two places. 'KlY. Defence of our Un'ivcr skies made by othei's. " But proceed," you say; " for what is all this to the purpose of our institutions ?" And we ourselves con- fess, that we are about to contemplate things fixed and determinate, not floating in the clouds, but subjected to this our earth, And you immediately urge. If some things in these foundations were from the be- ginning bv no means perfectly correct, — as human devices are not apt suddenly and all at once to glide into the most exact order ; — if other things are become corrnj)ted and degenerated, — as the very best things sometimes decline to the very worst ; — if many things are antiquated and covered with the rust of age, — as time is ever hastening to spread his rust over everyplace; — if you grant all this, still you, at the same time, strenu- ously insist, that many things, which yet remain, are worthy of praise, and valuable ; many things full of the 26 wisdoiii and good counsels of our ancestors ; many things improved by the studies of the moderns and our julvancements in science; — if besides, as you, perhaps, may still further urge, a few things less perfect, nay things which clearly call for reformation, still remain, — they may be suffered to remain by the greatest and best Being, to teach us, that, after so many good counsels, which have come to naught ; after so many attempts of the most excellent men, which have been wholly frustrated, — time itself, though working si- lently, is, after all, the best and the most powerful reformer : and amidst all objections we shall pay the respect due to such expostulations. XV. Greek and Latin Literature. As to what regards our present Universities, as they now exist, there may be possibly some persons ready to object, that they resound with too much Greek and Latin ; that they, at least, are more en- gaged in foreign languages, than is becoming, or than is necessary, in a British Athens. Such object- ors, however, we suspect, are not often found among your own members, or your own students, unless there be some — we hope very few — who, given up to the gratification of their appetites, or the dreams of indolence, must be very incompetent judges of the Greek and Latin languages, and of the method best fitted to the service of the Sciences. To such critics, who have neither eyes nor ears, it would be idle to engage in a controversy upon literature. On the objections of more reasonable men it may not be out of place to offer a few observations. It may be objected, then, that the Greek and Latin \ are dead languages ; that for the present times they ] are not necessary, and that for ordinary use they are 2() too arlihiial ; much perplexed with then' contortions, , transpositions, and ellipses ; unattainable without great labour; and unproductive of proportionate ad- vantages, when the knowledge of them is obtained. XVI. Dcjcnce of tlic GrccJx and hat'in Laus^uages. But, some of you would reply, Let those who would make this objection, not move too fast. For, how can the Greek language be properly accounted dead, which is still living in the Mediterranean and Ionian Islands, and through the vast regions of European Turkey ? in its grammatical forms, and primitive sense, indeed, somewhat changed ; but with respect to the letters, retaining the ancient pattern, and preserv- ing most of the words in their original signification ; adding to this, that where the Romaic, as the mo- dern Greek is called, is the vulgar tongue, the ancient Greek is by no means lost. And with respect to the Latin, how would they call that a dead language, which in some parts of Europe is more in common / use than among us ? And, when in the languages of Italy, Spain, Portugal, and France, the ancient Latin may be so easily discovered, and sensibly dis- tinguished ? It is admitted, that these languages do not follow ex- actly the same order and the same logical method, which we and some other Europeans more commonly do ; though this method is not altogether peculiar to them, (the Hebrew uses transpositions and is very elliptical,) and admits of a just defence. For by this method they assist the morals and genius of men, whose wants lan- guages ought certainly to supply. For man is not less an animal, than an intellectual, being : and this very method called artificial, though not so necessary in the daily intercourses of man with man, yet is often found even in them, and that too in all languages, liut in writings, whether prose or verse, it shines forth most strongly ; and frequently it is not only graceful and elegant, but eminently useful : it exercises and draws out the various powers of the mind; but much more it kindles up or cahns the passions, by turning men aside from ill-boding intentions, or by urging them to pursue any matter of moment with truer endeavour and stronger force ; for the whole power and arrange- ment of language have these ends in view : so that what in this matter is accounted art, is by no means opposed to nature ; it is no impediment, but rather a support ; and while yielding a gracious support renders nature more ample and capacious in the choice and arrangement of words, no less than in the construc- tion of sentences ; so great is the power, so extensive the operation, so beneficial the variety, which are to be found in numbers. On the subject of the Latin language, generally, there are some good observations by a person not more fitted to public offices, than practised in the elegant arts, and endowed with probity of morals, one formerly of this University, — Sir William Temple. He speaks to this effect : " The modern languages, the Italian, Spanish and French, are but imperfect dialects of the noble Latin, intermixt at first with the crude words and terminations of barbarous nations, by whose incursions the Roman Empire was overwhelmed, together with the ruins and terminations of the Latin tongue ; while the Latin tongue, decorated with the spoils of Greece, was composed and consti- tuted by the meditations and exercise of the most il- lustrious people, which have been committed to the records of history." Who, too, does not feel with our Bacon, " that it would be useful, if all the Academies scattered over 28 l'>un)j)e would contract a more open alliance and closer intimacy?" And, who does not see, that such a famili- arity and medium of intercourse can be no otherwise formed than by means of a language which is common /to all ? And, indeed, who of you does not, in fact, ■ know, that the learned, who have for many years past i^ been communicating with each other, and consulting concerning the arts and sciences, have entered on this course, and that the Latin language has been consti- tuted, as it were, their Mercury, the messenger of the Gods? ^^1lo, then, you will ask, can hold this lan- guage in lou- estimation ? Or what man, really learn- ed, or desirous of learning, can help judging of it as an acquirement eminently useful, and almost necessary ; and which, as a faithful administratrix, and compa- nion of ihe way, has adapted itself to the various pur- poses of science? Nor should we stop here : for to one who diligently weighs this matter it will appear, tliat great acknow- ledgements for great benefits received are due to the Greek and Latin languages : — for, in truth., not only through them, as so many conduits, have the arts and sciences, derived from their Eastern springs, flowed down to us ; but, unless as they go before and point out the course, the ^V^estern nations, even with re- spect to their own history, are all barrenness and dearth: "for everything, perhaps, relating to them," — these are the observations of Sir William Temple, — "which reaches beyond seven or eight hundred years, if those writings were taken away, would have been buried in obscurity." Of matters which run out beyond this space of time, and more particularly of what relates to us Britons, separated from the whole ivorld, all things are less kno'vn to us, in projiortion as they have been less treated of and confirmed by them. Such-like \^^Yn'< are general : they are obvious to w i 29 i every one; and before academics it is not necessary to dwell on particular points. What need is tiiere of going at large into the innumerable elegances, ithe copiousness, the variety, the sublimity of the Greek language ? of dwelling on philosophers and mathematicians, on poets, orators, and historians; in short, on that long race of distinguished writers on every art and science, who flourished in ancient (rreece? Their praises have been repeated again and again in every university of Europe, over the whole Christian world. You, gentlemen, by your right of office to admonish and exhort the British youth, are in the habit of strenuously urging them to these studies, and of repeating to them, " Nocturna versate manu, versate diurna 5" And with respect to such-like pursuits, no less delight- some and agreeable, than useful and honourable, you are in the habit, by golden prizes and sacred cups, given to excite emulation and a sense of honour, of stimulating the young men of Cambridge to the study of both these languages : "Quamobrem, pergite, ut facitis, atque in id stu- dium, in quo estis, incumbite, ut et vobis honori, amicis utilitati, et reipublicae utilitati esse possitis." To these should be added another sort of argu- ment ; since to these more general considerations theologians may offer their particular arguments. For all assemblies of Christians, how divided soever into different parties on their peculiar doctrines, possess a general agreement in the love and respect which they have for the writings called the New Testament, or Covenant : so that of this pursuit — the study of the Greek language — all Christians will be prepared to exclaim " Hanc video, sed pukhiu colo, qiue cerno per ipsam." 30 Thus, then, stands the matter. Had these pursuits been tlie occasions of the neglect and abandonment of others, whicli modern experience may draw forth and teach, which daily practice may approve and require, they would have been entitled to little praise. But this is not the case. Of late years, philosophy has been ap- plied to the service of the arts and manufactures of the country ; while mineralogy and other branches of natural history, political economy, and our common law, have also risen into notice ; to say nothing of those public exan^inations of under-graduates, which are now finally settled in both our Universities. X\'^II. Improvements made in the Universities. Of some literary improvements, which might natu- rally come under consideration in this place, notice has been taken elsewhere — in the History of Cambridge ; — so, in passing, some hints maybe dropped on what has occurred since that publication. Among the Oxoni- ans, then, their honours and prizes have been bestowed on those who are inquisitive into our ancient mother tongue, the Saxon ; there has been founded among them a Saxon Professorship *; and what that can do, has been done. In like manner among you, a learned person — than whom, while living, no one more ho- noured you, — Mr. Robert Tyrwhitt, has munificently held out encouragement to the study of the Hebrew language; and, what he bequeathed at his death, will, it is to be hoped, by inciting under-graduates to its study, give it firm and durable supj)ort : for the funds, which he with so much liberality bestowed, you have with no less judgment applied. j Thus far then as to classical pursuits, and to ob- jections made to the (jreek and Latin languages ^ en- * It has since occurred, that notice was taken in the History ol Cambridge, ot the ijuxon prolessorsliip at Oxford. 31 couraged, as they now are, in our Universities. Still, however, there remain some objections, relating not so much to the Greek and Latin languages them- selves, as to the ivritcrs in them, as being pagans, ex- hibiting, as objectors say, divinities with religious rites and fables, together with lawless amours ; a morality all profane, and contradictory to their sacred books. Hence it was, that the primitive Christians were for- bidden to attend the dramatic representations of such heathen writers : and hence some of the Fathers re- monstrated against their compositions : "Nonneego in te lego tonantem Jovem, et adulterantem ? — Et vide quemadmodum se excitat ad libidinem divine magisterio." Auqust'nius. Hence too in more recent periods, such books in Latin as Terentius Christianus by Cornelius Schoenaeus, and in Greek as the Meta- phrases of Serranus, re-edited by a late student of one of your colleges ; publications made with the direct intention to supply the place of the heathen Greek and Latin authors, with dramatic representations, hi- stories, psalms, and epigrams, versified out of the Jewish and Christian Scriptures : and, on a similar ! principle proceeds Henry Stephens's Address, written ! in Greek to Christian schoolmasters : all, indeed, ap- I proving the Greek and Latin languages, while censu- ring the writers in them ; " Non hie amore demens adolescentulus. Pudenda coram jactitabit crimina ; Nee fabulosus quispiam Deus, viri Mentitus formam, amantem fallet conjugem." But as such-like things belong rather to mythologies than languages, they do not properly come into con- sideration in this place. :i-i X\'III. Ohjections to the Studtj of the Mathernatics ; accowpanied with their Defence. There may be other objectors, who may be equally serious wltli you, oti the subject of Mathematics, — Of those who may object to your Physics and Ma- thematics, there may be some — young men, who talk ignorantly, like young men ; — some, wlio being de- voted to the Muses, as they are called, and the ^Irles humajtiores, if not prompted by the inconstancy and intractability of enthu>iasn^, or the frowardnessof a too delicate genius, may be said to have their minds pre- occupied by other more favourite stndies ; — some, The- ologians, from respect to their creeds, and, as they think, from no ill-tiuied prudence, or an earnest de- sire of abstracting themselves to their study of Divi- nity ; and, lastly, — others, and even some Mathema- ticians, from their regard to Philosophy, from the very love and respect which they bear to Mathematics. Of each of these in order. He, who through mere ignorance objects to any })articular studies, does but, — to borrow a phrase from our schoolboy book, — chatter like a magpie, pica garrit ; he utters sounds with his teeth and lips, but gives out no distinct words, none, which can be as- certained by a sure articulation. Now man is cha- racterized not by his voice, but by his reason : but, as it is said of phllosoi>hy, what it knows, it knows well ; so of ignorance it may be said, what it knows not, it knows not at all : and an argument derived from ig- norance deserves only a similar argument, an appeal to ignorance. Further, those who form their judgments from some powerful exuberance of poetic genius, from feelings over- delicate, or from minds pre-occupied by 33 other studies, — what do they say, but, that " the Muses and rural scenes please them beyond everything else ;" or that Logic, Rhetoric, History, Politics, or vvliatever else is preferred by them to Mathematics, is their de- light ? But where a question is started concerning the beauty, the liberality, the respectability, or the utility of any art or science, mere assertion neither proves nor disproves any thing ; and, as there is no disputing about particular tastes, so are no general conclusions to be drawn from them. In what some object, in behalf of Theology, we see the less, in proportion to the more ample provision made by your founders for what tends this way. Are not almost all the Heads, and Tutors, and Fellows of your Colleges, Theologians ? Are not the offices and employments assigned to them clerical ; the various benefices bestowed on them ecclesiastical ? The esta- blished lectures, the professorial duties, the public prayers, and the sermons both at the University church and in the College chapels, — do not these, with Mathematics, as it were, interspersed among them, all breathe of Theology ? Nor are we much af- fected by what some object, that Mathematics is apt to lean to Heterodoxy ; and that as some, under this plea, formerly opposed the Aristotelian Philosophy, — as others did afterwards the Cartesian Principles, — so at length on similar ground some opposed even the Mathematical Principles of Newton. Though, indeed, as by the force of Mathematical arguments the gravity of Theology receives but little increase, so neither by the overstrained confidence or absolute im- potence of it, in this case, could the value or the dignity of Mathematics suffer any diminution : nor is it, if we mistake not, more an opposer of truth, than Logic, or Metaphysics, or than History : indeed, by seriously D 34 employing itself in reflection, in inquiring, in con- necting together its propositions and arguments, so as to bring out clearly its demonstrations, it gives an evident elevation and powerful direction to the mind. Such, then, isin reality theaim of Mathematics, to direct and to elevate the understanding, so as to give a more ready entrance to truth : this is its method, its pro- fession ; and should a Mathematician, by the force of his arguments, happen to disturb the dreams of su- perstition, the reveries of Metaphysics, or the ravings of enthusiasm, it would not of necessity follow, that he would thereby do any harm to that religion, which has its birth in the understanding, which produces conviction in the conscience, which corrects bad habits, and rests quietly in the heart. XIX. Theology not to be defended by Mathematical Arguments. — Other objections to Mathematics. But to speak more clearly to this point. Those seem to have wandered wide of the mark, in this ar- gument, who have been for placing the Demonstra- tion of the Existence and Attributes of the Supreme Bein^ on a Mathematical basis ; nor less those, who have been for explaining and illustrating his nature by Algebraic ratios, and Geometric proportions : so, at least in regard to them, have judged many of your own men of learning. Bishop Law and others : for though, say they, this Geometric way of proof, by the analogy of the composition and resolution of ratios,, possesses in matters relating to the arts and' sciences- great force, the nature of God, which surpasses the human sense, is beyond their reach. That cannoti be ascertained by Geometric proportions, — which can; be brought under the laws of sense, — nor be resolved by 35 ratios and proportions, nor circumscribed and divided by any measures of quantities : and it is not more beyond the reach of Euchd's rules, than of the ar- guments a jrriori. By clearly discerning, and seriously weigliing these matters, it was, that a man of great authority in your schools. Dr. Paley, for the demonstrations which he thought should be deduced of the attri- butes of God, marked out a course, as ye know, very different. Leaving the arguments of the high a priori way, as it is called, as not adapted to his sub- ject, he pursued with great skill that broader, safer, and more certain one, called the r) posteriori, which the works of nature point out to us, and which the human understanding can follow and comprehend. With respect to another objection to Ma- thematics, viz. that your time is too much occupied, in it, there has been a controversy very lately started among your own Mathematicians, as there had been some time ago, recommending a union of Classical literature with Mathematical. The different societies of learned men are agreed, that all the arts and sciences, which relate to human life, have a certain common chain, and are bound together by their relation to each other ; that they mutually support aud assist each other ; and that to each, its appropriate honours are due. This was shadowed forth by the mythologies and hieroglyphics of antiquity ; as where the Muses are made to con- sist of nine, all sisters, as, in like manner, were the Graces ; the leader and attendant of these latter in the dances being Venus, and of the other the God of intellectual and musical harmony, Apollo. The same harmony was pointed out by that most elegant fable of Cupid and Psyche : and, in like manner, among d2 30 tlie Eii:vptiaiis, seven letters inclosed within two fingers indicated the Muses; and theCynocephalus,an animal of a mixed nature, letters and literature : and for the same reason, the Cynocephalus was sacred to the par- taker of all learning, Mercury. Some learned men, whom we had lately in our eye, clearly perceived all this ; and, notwithstanding their ardent love for the Mathematics, were unwilling from that other part of literature, called classical and the more elegant, to withhold their homage and respect : they even wished to see it placed, and at no great di- stance, near Mathematics itself ; and with this view, as some thought, most worthy of praise, they wished to offer a Grace, as we have already noticed, to the senate : they, indeed, well knew, that by the munifi- cence of your benefactors, prizes not a few, as well in private colleges, as publicly in the University, were regularly distributed to those, who in poetical, histo- rical, rhetorical, and theological prolusions and ex- ercitations among their fellow students came off the victors ; and this, so far as it went, they much ap- proved. But they looked for greater things : they wished that leave might be given for classical and other branches of useful learning, to sustain its pro- per character, in the public examinations, and to re- ceive their appropriate honours at the time of taking degrees : adding, at the same time, that the two gold medals given by the Chancellor, however honourable they might be considered, could not extend to all graduates, or rather, indeed, had nothing at all to do with Degrees *. And, probably, these advocates were led to their * While the Latin text of this work was in the press, the im- portant improvements alluded to were actually going on in the University. 37 opinion by the following, among other, arguments ; that as among the Oxonians many of the fooleries, which had been long practised in their schools, had, at length, been got rid of, and Mathematics been allowed to have an honourable seat near the Huma- nities, it was in like manner to be hoped, that Classic Literature, with those studies which are usually con- nected with it, would among the Cantabrigians, in like manner, and with equal opportunities for suc- cess, be permitted to obtain its distinctions and re- wards ; and, that as the latter softens the manners of mankind, and serves the common purposes of civil life not less, and some think even more by its hu- manity, than the former by its severity, and that as, in- deed. Classical Literature is the support and the orna- ment of mathematical, both, under the protection of their bountiful mother, should be equally cherished, and join hands together ; being, perhaps, almost persuaded that they heard the Muse, the Goddess of the Huma- nities — if in speaking on a classical subject we may be allowed a little classical levity — supplicating the senate in their behalf ; " Nolite sinere per vos artes liberates Recidere ad paucos ; facite, ut vestra auctoritas Mese auctoritati fautrix adjutrixtjue sit." XX. Objections to certain Parts of the Mathematics in the Jt^ay now taught at Cambridge. But to proceed : there have been others, and now are, among your own members, and those, according to your own judgement, men of ingenuity, much commended for their knowledge both of Geometry and Algebra, who, though greatly admiring those branches of science, cannot in all things follow your method in teaching them. They do not object to teach- 38 ing Mathematics systematically; nay they think, that nothing should he taught in the way ofa course, and in a systematic Older, more than Mathematics, and accord- ing to some system approved of by the highestandmost general opinion of learned men ; at least till some- thing better should be clearly discovered, as being ascer- tained and confirmed by them ; but they fear, that every thing now received systematically is respected too superstitiously, while some things, perhaps, of happy invention, though in a somewhat different di- rection, are passed by without the slightest notice ; wtll remembering how religiously the name, with every opinion, of Aristotle, — a name, within certain limits, still entitled to respect, — was looked up to both by Cantabrigians and Oxonians : these persons, with their admiration, mingling something of censure, and com})laint, acknowledge Geometry to be the best teacher of Logic and the most safe guide in the pur- suit of the sciences ; and Algebra they readily ac- knowledge is a science remarkable for its perspicuity, and full of elegance : but they think, that as well in your explanations of the former as of the latter science, there is more obscuritv in your academical books, than necessity requires, or than decency should permit ; more uncertainty, than suits doctrines to be referred to the senses, and experience, or than is con- sistent with the subjects themselves, and with con- sequently less of pleasure accompanying them, than there ought to be, in things, which should allure and captivate the young mind. Add to this, that they think, the Mathematics, which you teach, attempts some things, which are not of its jurisdiction ; such as whatgoestoexplain the causeof motion and light; with certain other things, which relate to the heavenly bodies. Mathematical demonstrations on subjects which de- 39 pend on them they greatly approve, and religiously respect ; but such things, they niuintain, are beyond their power. Euclid and Newton they consider as almost divine men ; but not so divine, as not to be liable to err; nor could they over either chant what some poet has over Homer : As-pa [jLev YiiJ.avpW(r£y xa« hpa, xoxXa creAijj'Tjf . Nor scarcely what another says : XXI. The JVr'iters Apology for treating so freely on the Mathematics, and his Reasons for chuelling so long on Literary Subjects. But, while addressing Academics on such subjects, we wish the reader to understand, that we are not undertaking to enforce or recommend any thing for ihit practical observation of Mathematicians, nor even of young men, who may incline to Mathematical studies. Let everyone attend to his own department : and us to what we deem ours. We have, indeed, in some sort assumed a character here, and spoken in the person as it were of some of your Mathematicians. This was all which we had in view; to make it appear, whatever some may think of pure Mathematics, — as it is called, — and of those who by their great devo- tedness to the study of it, abstract themselves from human affairs, that we hold Mathematicians in the greatest respect, and according to our sphere. Mathe- matics itself, as explaining and illustrating the works of nature, and as showing and demonstrating its laws and powers, and Physics, as that which assists and promotes the sciences derived from the senses and the 40 intellect ; always keeping this in mind, that we are not ill this place making a dissertation on Mathe- matics, nor entering into controversies with Mathema- ticians, but that every thing hitherto advanced by us about literature, has only, according to our own man- ner and distinct province, been treated of rather hi- storically, or narratively, than scientifically or disputa- tiously. And thus much for literary matters: and, to speak the truth, we have detained the reader so much the longer by our admiration of certain things which have pre- ceded, in proportion as with some things, which follow, we are less pleased: not being altogether ignorant, that there have been persons who consider and describe as oppugners of the truth, and as the spoilers of the inge- nuous arts, those, who on subjects not very certain entertain any doubts, or from subjects not very useful or agreeable make any detraction, confounding toge- ther the TO. ovra, and the ru fi>ri ovtu. XXII. On the Political or CEconoinical State of our Universities. The subject which next oflfers itself to our consi- deration, is of. that kind which is called political or recojioniical, concerning which not many words will be looked for, perhaps, in this place, particularly, as in the Privileges of Cambridge, which this work con- tains, some things of this nature are exhibited much at length, and as it would be prudent — as some may think — to say here nothing at all, lest we should be thought desirous of fishing on the dry earth, or of hunting in theopen sky, or of flyingover the waves of a stormy sea. But, where our destinies seem to lead, we follow, and our mind seems scarce possessed of self- direction. For some Genius, cither good or bad, as 41 lieretofore, so again, nowcalls us forth, and Conscience, whether well-directed or phrenzy-stricken, urges us on. But let that Genius dictate what it may, some di- stinctions should be made by us. We should guard against confounding inquirers with accusers, apolo- gists with enemies, and friendly conferences with the animadversions of malignant censurers, or biting satirists. And why should we not .'^ Who will accuse a person of things transacted many years before he was born ? Posterity must be allowed to examine the acts and institutions of former ages, to compare them together, to weigh them well, and to deliver on them a free opinion, so it be with modesty, with justice, with benevolence, with humanity; but, as every man must be charged with his own faults, and his own virtues, so mustevery age : and as the people of the present times should form their judgement of those who went be- fore, so should such as come after form their judge- ment of us. The law does its work, and in passing, often leaves some bad effects behind : but the ages which succeed may be upright and free from blame ; and unless they refuse to remove the dirt and rubbish collected, to bring accusations against them would be a crime. Nor are we altogether ignorant by what a chain men are accustomed to be holden to the schools and academies, where they passed their youthful days, where they cultivated useful learning, where they ob- tained flattering distinctions and proud honours ; af- fections these, which are taught us by nature, are confirmed by experience, and cherished by con- templation : when such-like objects — as our early schools — are present to our sight, they are viewed with a pleasure, which partakes of gratitude ; and, when they are absent, that remains ; the love of 42 former times even glows to old age ; and if we hap- pen to visit such ahodes, or only as from a distance to contemplate tlieu), we are apt to express ourselves ill the language of religious veneration ; " O ! tu severi religio loci, Quocunque gaudes nomine. — " XXIII. Men not tube blamed fur examining an- cient Institutions, ur even their oiv?i particular Cuni' 7nunities : a?nl may censure deject sin them^ without disrespect to the inembers. }5ut to what does all this declamation tend ? To this: to make it appear, that with respect to these af- fections, though they are perhaps, in themselves, and to a certain extent honourahle and pious, it would be rash to say of them, what the proverb says of that wayward, inconsiderate, Fugitive Boy, the Cupid of the Poets, viz : that "Love is blind," and that it is impossible to love and be wise. Who of you does not recollect the manner in which Thucydides, the celebrated writer of the Pelo- ponnesian War, conducted himself towards his fellow citizens, the Athenians ? On comparing together the Speeches delivered by the ambassadors of the Corcy- reeans and Corinthians with those of the Athenians and Lacedrcmonians, it will be clearly seen, that the Athenians themselves, seized with a too great lust of government, were the occasion of that most lament- able war, and that with them rested the blame of it : So it apj)eared to Thucydides : and the light of Truth, so resplendent in his history, made it " a perpetual inheritance,"- — x.Tri(jM ic an, to borrow his own phrase, — more than the profundity of its sentiments, and the eloquence of its language. Amidst such avowals can we suppose, that the same Thucydides did not love the Athenians ? 43 On the contrary, of Athens he seems to have made his boast, and to have forestalled something of glory by prefixing the name of Athenian to his Work, his History beginning thus — "Thucydides the Athenian wrote this history of the Peloponnesian war ;" and in that admirable Funeral Oration, which the said histo- rian puts into the mouth of Pericles, when writing in form, and order, he says every thing agreeable, every thing liberal, every thing benevolent, of Athens. On the other hand, DIonysius of Halicarnassus, being a Rhetorician, no less than an Historian, even censured Thucydides, because he rather blamed than praised, the Athenians, because he did not tickle their ears with enticing words, and because he thereby had not con- sulted the true grace of history : as though an histo- rian did not belong to mankind at large rather than to any particular city, or had a province distinct from the delivering of the truth. On this stupid, arrogant censure of Dionysius our Hobbes of Malmesbury has delivered the most merited castigation, and has, in a manner, lashed him almost to death. As to these our literary academias, will any one deny, that Francis Lord Bacon, a man, who for sound- ness of judgment was almost without compare, pos- sessed for them a very great love ? Yet did he in all the Universities of Europe existing in his time, our own, as well as foreign, point out many defects and wants. Will any one say, that by Erasmus, who court- ed and visited our English Universities, no less than those on the Continent ; who by his genius, his elo- quence, and his learning, in a great measure put their barbarism to flight ; who, though a foreigner, was honourably adopted by Cambridge as a sort of Fellow and Professor; will any one say, that such seats of literature were not contemplated by him with feel- 44 ings of clue respect ? Vet did this same Erasmus seriously deplore, and even bitterly attack, certain evils, wiiich were too common among them. And, to come nearer our own times, who will sus- pect, that Mr. Robert Tyrwhitt and Dr. John Jebb, with that most respectable assemblage of Academics residing at Cambridge in their time, and petitioning for the removal of Subscriptions to Articles of Faith, at the time of taking Degrees, did not venerate their Alma Mater, and greatly desire to see her in a sound and flourishing condition .^ OrMr.AV^m.Whiston and Mr.W'm. Frend, notwithstanding the serious contests which they had with the Members of the University .^ And who can for a moment suppose, that Mr. Locke, and Dr. Richard Newton, and Dr. Vicesimus Knox, with many others, had not the same feelings and the same sentiments towards their Alma Mater of Oxford .^ Vet did Locke— for to say nothing of the severe things ad- vanced by others, Locke shall speak for the rest — after considering some happy occurrences in his time, under the Revolution of 1088, openly and honestly avow to King William, " If your Majesty does not reform the Universities, every thing will go back again." Did not all these distinguished men possess a high love for literature ? Who, indeed, doubts it .^ Nay, further, if we mistake not, they complimented and congratulated themselves with the name of Acade- mic ; and, in proportion as their love of science was more ardent, the greater was their desire to see the seats consecrated to it as perfect as possible. And, indeed, many things which they wished to be cor- rected, have been amended and carried to some height of improvement. Vou, too, have lived to see the fruits of their labours, and the sight has rejoiced you. Such men will live in your affections ; they will live 45 .igiiin, as it were, in the memory of future ages ; tliey will flourish in the recollections and congratulations of all good men ; they will he ever present with you as witnesses to the truth, as examples of virtue ; they will, at the same time, excite a good hope, that if other such men, in the lapse of years, should arise, they will not be considered as opposers of literature, or as enemies to good order. XXIV. OpiJiions of certain Persons on the Po- litical Character of our Universities. But to return to our point. To any of you. Aca- demics, who may have seriously considered this sub- ject, the Privileges of Cambridge, and to any others, who having no interest in them, may only cursorily look into them, it will, perhaps, appear, that what we call the political or ceconomical History of Cambridge, is not only of some length, but involved in consider- able difficulties ; and that a thorough examination, or, indeed, a bare enumeration of its several parts is beyond our reach : though, indeed, wliat our powers, or our sentiments may be, is of no great consequence : for we are going to deliver more generally the senti- ments of others. In the first place, then, it does not escape you, that Hobbes of Malmesbury, with others, used to assert, that what we call Universities had their origin and derived all their authority from the sacerdotal power of the Popes, being founded at first, so they thought, as castellated towers for the protection and defence of the Romish Church ; nor, that some others, — of the Catholic faith, — long entertained an opinion, that our English Universities would return to the same go- vernment and discipline, from which, under the pre- text of reformation, they had departed. Of the latter -4(5 number, it" we are not iiiistuken, was our Hare, the coini)iler of these Privileges : so we conjecture from the manner in whicli he begins, as ye have seen, his Register, "To the honour and gUirvof AhnightvGod, our Lord Jesus Christ, tlie Saviour of tlie world, and of his glorious and most blessed Mother, the Virgin Mary, and of the Saints in heaven, 1, Robert Hare, Esq. dedicate this book of Privileges, and other mat- ters relating to the generous and immaculate Univer- sity." ^^'e infer this, from the zeal which he disco- vered in this work : it was, indeed, no light under- taking, yet he engaged in it without any fee or re- ward, except the thanks of the two Universities ; for he compiled the Privileges of Oxford on the same scale: and in a book, which lies in MS. — in our pos- session — written with great study, about the time of Hare, — as is clear from the hand-writing, — the anony- mous author so expresses himself that he cannot be misunderstood : full of confidence, that the Romish faith and ancient manners would be restored to Eng- land, he lays down and describes, with great effort and much thought, the laws and customs, which would prevail, both in the government of the state and of the Universities, under that imaginary restoration. XX X'^. A differ ejit Statement made of the Political Character of our Universities. But, in strict truth, we caimot agree with Hobbes, and some others, in every particular on this subject ; but ratherwith Crevier,the Historian of the University of Paris : for on considering the ancient history of Universities generally, and, more particularly, the Pri- vileges and earliest Charters of our own, — whe- ther they are forged or genuine, on which we are not inquiring in this place, — they seem to hold out, that 47 they were first derived rather from kings tlum popes, and afterwards were made the occasion or pretext ifor obtaining others. Perhaps, the true opinion is, that kings and popes held communications with each other on the subject, each giving, and, as it were, interminghng, his distinct authority, as the greatness jof the occasion required ; kings giving charters and endowments, with the power of holding in mortmain ; the popes confirming them., and granting what are called Bulls, by their sacerdotal authority. With re- spect to those, who think, that these academical establishments will return again to the Catholic party, few, probably, will come to the same conclusions with them, if they consider, how things were settled from the beginning of the Reformation ; and, in- deed, if the unsettled state of things for some time led any to form too great expectations of this kind, they soon vanished into air : and the spirit and temper of the present age, as well as what is called the British Constitution, as fixed and confirmed imder King William, has now left such an occurrence not only improbable, but next to impossible. But, if the foundations of Universities are in some degree concealed, the heights which they have reach- ed are easily seen, their manners and customs are known to all ; for it is clear, that these literary insti- tutions were much subjected to the papal See, — so great authority had the religion of our ancestors, — that papal charters — bulls — were thence given, that liberties and indulgences were thence dispensed ; and, as the other universities of Europe had been bound by the double knot of civil and ecclesiastical authority to the pontifical chair, so also were, in some measure, the courts of the University of Cambridge ; for though the royal was the supreme law, still the civil law pos- 48 sessed its uuthorltv thore, and tlic lloinaii See re- tained the power of imposing its constitutions and scliolastic decretals. XX\'^I. Our Univcrsltt/-courts rei^ulated more ac- cording to the Forms of the Civil Law, than of the Commo/i Law of England. Such an administration of the affairs of the Uni- versity, — bv its civil law proceedings, — has to various been displeasing ; not because they denied, that many of the principles, reasons, and grounds of the civil law were, in sundry respects, clear, depending on general arguments, and worthy of constituting, as they do, a great part of the law of nations, nor that it is often written with elegance, nor that as a code it is often humane and stored with a variety of learning, nor that its study and proceedings have wonderfully en- gaged the nations of modern Europe ; but because they were not pleased, that the forms and proceed- ings of our common law, of the law of the land, which our great Charter and the British Constitution favour before all others, should give j)lace, in our academical courts, to the forms and proceedings of the civil law ; which being formed into a body, at a time, when the Romans had passed under the yoke of slavery, are less favourable to the cause of freedom : for as time, in his course, often consumes what we could wish to abide, so also do certain forms of our law-courts, some of the best principles of the laws themselves. XXVI. Diff'erence hetxceen the Civil and Common Law. On the nature and principles of the civil law, seve- ral authors of distinguished learning among your own members have, as you well know, written at large ; 4U and on tlieir steps it is not necessary to press too closely in the present place. Suffice it just to hint, that the further the forms and proceedings of the civil law recede from those of the common law of England, — and they do very much, — so much the greater praise, on weighing the pretensions of each in an equal scale, have the latter ohtained, and merited, over the former; — an ohservation, however, this, which re- lutes principally to the forms and proceedings in our courts, rather than to many of the English laws them- selves, which are, in truth, bad enough. This has been shewn by many Academics, particularly, in former times, by an honest man, Lord Chancellor Fortescue, and not long since elegantly, and from British history, by Bishop Hurd, formerly of Cambridge. These wri- ters have made it appear, that the English laws have been kept clear of the impure mixtures of the canon and Cccsarean laws, and that of our more ancient English kings, — as well as of the Tudor family, and that of the Stuart line — those who inclined the most solemnly to despotic power, did in proportion favour more earnestly the civil law ; and, in short, that the civil law itself is at variance with those liberties, wont to be claimed, ac- cording to their constitution, by Britons : and, hence it was, that, in reference to the introduction of the 'civil law, our ancient barons, with one heart, and one voice, shouted " Nolumus leges Anglia, inutarir But, not to seem, — if we may borrow the language of Persius, — to have been dreaming too much on this two-crowned eminence — the «»ftoii and civil law, — or at least, not to appear to make a boast of having dreamt there, we shall but notice here a single cir- jcumstance, which is this, that according to the civil |law, *' the will of the prince gives being and force to jlaw ;" a dictum, which was always grating to the ears 50 of Ikitons; "for" to borrow Judge Fortescue's words, " the statutes of England cannot be made in that man- ner, they not behig passed at the will of the prince, hut hy the consent of the whole nation." Influenced by these, and otl>er considerations of a kind similar to these, there have been some persons among your own members, and others, who were not members, but who have, perbaj)s, voluntarily sepa- rated from your community, or been directly expelled from it, who have thought, that some tilings called l*rivileges of Cambridge, are, with respect to them, Hud others, no privileges at all ; and that, with respect to yourselves, they are dangerous ones, ho^a, uhu^d. ilecollecting these things, and, to speak the truth, not differing from them very widely in opinion, we were desirous of searching into the very marrow, as it were, of truth, on this subject ; at the same time to assure ourselves, in what such a state of things hud its origin; and, beginning in principles and facts, to make the whole business pass before our own eyes, and before the eyes of others, who, if there should be any such, might entertain opinions on these matters not dissimilar to our own. XXVIII. Incidental Allusions to certabi Statutes, and some other Matters oj" Universitij-lteg'wien, and to Controversies relating to them. While we were revolving these things in our mind, the case seemed brought to this issue. The polity of our Universities is, in some respects, of a nature peculiar to itself, and, indeed, possesses more of law than pproerly belongs to places of literature. But, as we have University courts, it is to be lamented, that, in the constitution of them, the foundation was not laid rather in the principles and forms of the mu- 51 nicipal law of England, than in those of the Roman civil law. The heights to which these institutions have risen, would thereby have exhibited an aspect to our manners more appropriate, and shone with greater lustre ; the more pleasing to the eyes of Britons ge- nerally, as more resembling the constitution of our civil state ; they would have been less subject to the cavils and complaints of opposers ; would have stood in less need of the flatteries of Academics, because commend- ed and admired, and worthy of being commended and admired, by the prompt assent and cheerful suffrage of all good citizens : the dissensions and contentions, often amounting to warfare, which so abounded in the early part of the history of our University, would not have taken place ; the rights of our Cambridge magistrates could not have been invaded ; the liberties of Acade- mics would not have been violated ; the consciences of students and graduates would have been left un- shackled ; for it was on the authority of a civil law principle, that certain serious impositions were intro- duced : all things, perhaps, to say much in few words, would have redounded more to the glory and felicity of our University, as they certainly would to the true interest and sensible gratification of the British State. But, although such-like matters are now only in- cidentally mentioned, it may be proper here to add, that as various objections have been made to our ci- vil and canon law polity, so also serious controver- sies have followed relating to them, and other matters rising out of them ; while some have objected, that what time has antiquated should be seasonably ex- amined, and openly abolished. Such-like controver- sies have been raised, with others of a more literary, academical nature ; and these latter have been carried e2 .52 on with better effect. Others, again, were of opinion,— :is most tliinking men still are,— that certain matters were of too ecclesiastical a cast for academical stu- dents, and were too much pervaded by the spirit of the civil law to be acceptable to the true-born Briton : and on these latter so unfortunate circumstances has arisen what we feel more immediately as our own l)rimary concern, and we might add, personal, were it not at the same time a general, grievance. Yes ! these matters last alluded to — we allude to our subscriptions to thirty-nine Articles of Faith, — to many persons engaged in controversies, have appeared the great evil in our present system, though they may wish to be of the number rather of those, who do not forget their own errors, than of those, who are for accusing and condemning others. We are the crea- tures of circumstances ; and as different men's minds become, by their different course of education, their settled habits, their distinct studies, and personal con- nexions, differently constituted, they will form diffe- rent associations in their ideas, receive a different biasi in their actions, and a different rule for their con-| sciences : and, as every man's mind is, as we say, him- self, so must "every man be fully persuaded in his own mind." And, if " it is not in man that vvalketh| to direct his own steps," still less can he the minds, the actions, and the consciences, of others. And here a controversy may be conceived to be| started by some persons, relative to the light in which | the violators of certain statutes are to be considered:; to wliich the rej)ly has been ready ; that the vice-chan- cellor at the end of the term, by virtue of his offi-| cial and ecclesiastical oflice, has the power of absolv- ing, — as he does, — at the end of the term, the vio- lators of certain statutes ; that some roval orders and! 53 acts of the senate are somewhat mitigated by the de- crees of the masters ; that to a principle of civil law is allowed all its force, " that what for many years is not acted upon is rendered obsolete ;" and that in our Colleges, as well as in our Universities, " what the universal consent of those societies allows to fall into disuse, is assigned to oblivion." These are understood to be among the privileges of Academics. Although, therefore, certain objectors just alluded to, may not cordially congratulate them on such privileges, they must not hastily, and in the gross, condemn them. Willing, however, as they may be, to enlarge their own views on this subject, and to stretch their candour to the utmost point, it must still be felt, that an apology for men, acting under given circumstances, implies no defence of the erro- neous systems, no approbation of the established forms, which govern them. It is the want of timely, salutary reforms, which gives occasion for tempo- rary expedients ; and it might be devoutly wished, that the discipline of an enlightened body did not re- quire them. At all events, no apology can be intended for the continuation of a practice — our subscriptions to the thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England, — which as it will be hereafter made the ground of n distinct, often-repeated, long-continued complaint, so will it be accompanied with the protests of many excellent and learned men. XXIX. Further Considerations on the Civil Law^ in the Polity of the JJjiiversity . These allusions are, however, many of them, pre- mature ; but the subjects appeared of a nature so se- rious, as to justify a few aberrations. Readers will, therefore, please to consider them as a parenthesis. 54 Our proscnt business is with the civil law in rela- tion to our iJnivtrsitics : and how much their oeconomy breathes of the spirit of that law, wlmt has already been said, will shew ; what will hereafter follow, will explain more clearly : it will likewise more fully shew the constitution and political state of our Uni- versities. Here might be taken into consideration the Ex- ordium of Queen Elizabeth's Statutes, which how much it is both in form and principles after the manner of Justinian's exordium to the Institutes, has been hinted elsewhere. It was enough for her Majesty to say, " mandatum necessitatem facit," and the whole was settled, the whole of the polity, dis- cipline, and literature, of the University, fixed by royal authority. The same view is to be taken of King James's Letters and Orders imposing subscrip- tions, which, though delivered with a semblance of courtesy, possessed enough of the style imperatorial to demonstrate, and they were given, that Academics might understand, — to use his own words on another occasion, — " what a king could do in the plenitude of his power."* XXX. ()?/ the Senate and Caput. We now turn, and with all due respect, to the Aca- demical Senate. There are those who are in the habit of admiring this Academical Senate, which, consisting of two houses * While this slicct was in the press, two or three pages of the writer's c:oj)y were mislaid. As they contained matter adapted to this jjhue, particularly the testimonies of Lord Coke, Judge Hales, and Judge HIackstone against the civil law polity of our Universities, they will be given at the end of this pamphlet. In the mean time, i^ec the Introduction to Hlackstone's Commentaries. 55 of regents and non-regents, with a chancellor or vice- chancellor conjoined to them, resembles, as they think, the British Senate, composed, in like manner, of two- houses of nobles and commons, with a king as su- preme; and hence it is, perhaps, that some accustom' themselves to call our University, a Literary Republic. In the mean time there may be others, who equally respect this Academical Senate, according to its pro- per dignity, and even admire it, yet can they not, should they ever so much wish, admire every thing belong- ing to it. For example, the Caput of Five, — as it is call- ed, — consisting of one doctor in theology, one in law, one in physic, one non-regent, and one regent, toge- ther with the vice-chancellor, they cannot altogether approve. Considering them, indeed, as representa- tives of the different faculties and ranks, of which the Senate, in the aggregate, is composed, we, perhaps, may view them in their proper office, as the guardians of the privileges of each, as the watchmen, *• ne quid de=- trimenti respublica capiat." But, in asserting their peculiar privileges, what does this Caput of Five, in fact, assert.^ Thus runs the statute: "These have the authority in every Senate, and in every congregation, to determine with respect to the reception of all petitions before they can be brought before the whole body of the Senate;" so that those Graces only can be approved* and proposed to the regents and non-regents, which these five all give their consent to, and no other ; "and if any thing is prayed, or granted, which is not first approved by their judgement and assent, it is null and of no authority, unless it is otherwise provided for by our statutes." From these premises we perceive, that this Caput is what the Grammarians call *' the Verb," wherein lies, as they say, the whole power of speech, and with- 56 out uliich no sentence can be fonned : for, if the as- sent of eaeli of the Caput is not granted, whatever niav be suppHcated, it is ail over with the (irace ; the congregation is in vain ; there can be nothing moved, nothing done, ^\'hat Ikitish senators would approve such a power ; which, if a similar one was lodged in four or five of their own members, might destroy all their authority ? AVho could be in love with that excess of prerogative, which would go to overthrow entirely his own libcrtv ? Wliat senator, in his in- dividual character, either of the House of Lords or Commons, could extol a council of five, when a single one of them could reduce the whole Senate to no- thing ; not, indeed, by retarding the body, when in motion, but, what is more, by preventing it from beginning to move, and suppressing it altogether? Let us not wonder, if there have been, in this Se- nate of most learned and respectable men, those who have con'')idered this Caput, thus acting, as no natural part of their body, but rather as what is called an ex- crescence, swelling and puflV, rather than beautiful, hostile to the liberty of the Academical Senate, so per- fectly hostile to our notions of liberty, that in the Jiritish Senate there is nothing which is like it — nihil sif/ii/e, nut scvundum. In the Senate of the British republic each legis- lator claims his peculiar and distinct right of moving, of proposing, of bringing in bills ; the Senate, in its congregational capacity, the right of deliberating and consulting in connnon, as becomes legislators, about to act for the good of the State. If they choose out of their own body to form a connnittee, they can do so : but for what purpose should they constitute one ? Think you, that it would be with a view that such connnittee should be authorized to determine whe- 57 ther any of them should have the privilege of making, or of not making a motion^ of deliberating, or of not deliberating, of resolving, or of not resolving ? This, assuredly, would ill comport with their dignity. What is, then, the office of such committee ? To make in- quiry into all things which relate to the subject under consideration, to bring forward any facts, with which they may be well acquainted themselves, to give an account of what they may have learned from others, to compare together the result, and, after thoroughly sift- ing the whole matter, to submit it, in its complete form, and the utmost perspicuity, to the House, whether of Lords or Commons. What next ? The House itself forms its own judgement : and, should the business proceed and terminate otherwise, the privileges of the British Senate would scarcely be reckoned among its ADMIRANDA ! And, in truth, these things, at the very outset, wear an ill-omened aspect. For, what shall we say ? Nay, rather, what have not many of the Senate said ? What if the whole Caput were possessed of integrity ? May it not err in judgement ? Is all wisdom lodged in this Caput of Five ? Is there none in the Senate, in its ag- gregate capacity ? What now if, one of the Caput only prove corrupt ? Would he not perplex and confound all his assessors ? Their councils, though the very best, would he not lay prostrate ? Will men, so prone to be too partial to themselves and friends, always consult for the good of others? May they not be apt to prefer the interest and glory of their own Colleges to the honest counsels and just expectations, though they were even of the great majority, of the Senate ? May they not consult the order of the prince, or the beck and wish of the prime minister for the time being, before the honour of the University, the interest of sound learning, or 58 eyen the increase (»f virtue and religion ? There are, we well enough know, those, who think, that this very Caput may become the vortex, in which the most de- sirable privileges of the University may be greatly en- dangered, and even quite absorbed. It is not necessary to bring fonvard examples of the exercise of this power before Academics. They appear in due course in the public business of the Senate : and it is matter of grief, and a trial of patience, that hence have sometimes arisen obstructions, which have prevented some very serious and learned men from oflering their opinions to the Senate, and debarred them from an opportunity of giving their suffrages ac- cording to their consciences, and on subjects, perhaps, of the greatest consequence, relating either to the pro- gress of literature, or the institution of youth, or the purity of morals and true piety. \\ ith whatever me- ditations they have delighted themselves at home, with whatever good counsels they came stored into the Se- nate, they obtained nothing of their end, although it was well-known to them, that the greater part of the Senate was favourable to their honest endeavours : and thence it came to pass, that, though they felt the grie- vance, they endured it ; much displeased, that no way was left open to their virtuous exertions ; but, at the same time, unwilling to lose their labour and study, they gave up the cause, and became silent. — And thus far of the Senate and Caput. XXXI. (hi Subscription to the Thirty -nine Articles. Concerning those topics, to which some allusions have already been made, and in the continuation of tliis discourse, some further inquiries remain to be i 59 gone into, and which we call political and oeconorni- cal, the matter is various, put together at different times, and to be defended or opposed, should any one choose to defend or oppose them, by different reasons and arguments : part of them is plainly of a higher age, which prudent men, through modesty might not venture to engage, nay, to which, for their antiquity, they may think some respect is due. The other part is manifestly of a later period, which these same wise and liberal-minded men may not think of great value, but rather a great loss, ruinous props, or base conta- minated vessels, or as the dii fictiles of the place, which, although placed in golden temples, ought to be unbound, pulled asunder, and with our utmost strength to be destroyed. This, then, we wish to be understood of those subscriptions to certain political, metaphysical, and theological dogmas, about which have arisen — as is customary on obscure and important points — long con- troversies among learned and pious men, vague doubts, wide differences, and subtle distinctions of opinions. But for the truth and authority of these points, all of you must be bound by the solemn obligation of an oath, whether young students taking the first degree of honour, or advancing to the higher distinctions. Indeed, subscription is twice required, if the same gra- duate be elected a Fellow of any of the colleges. And for the degree of Bachelor in Divinity, or of Doctor in any faculty, subscription is likewise repeated. All these subscriptions we owe to the Letters of King James to the University, containing the directions delivered some of them " first with his own mouth, then with his own hand." With what term shall we designate such subscrip- tions .^ What opinion have men of high consideration 00 held of them ? Why, they style these attempts hmova- tiuns. 'i'hev drew their first origin — so, as we remem- ber, they used to declare, and, as it appears from these Privileges, rightly — not from the ancient statutes of our founders, not from the legislative authority of the reahn, nav not even from the public decision and sanction of the Academic Senate, but, as appears from what has been stated above, from the royal plea- sure merely, from the mandate, as we before stated, of James, the tyrant of England — which term, however, wo do not wish to be received in its modern sense, with a notion of cruelty attached to it, but as the rv^uviog of the ancient Greeks, for a sovereign; yet, at the same time, it seems more applicable here, as James, and also all the Stuarts, and the Tudors before them, deserting the usages of liritons, and imitating the Ro- man Emperors, — when the liberty of the Romans was destroyed, — set up their own arbitrary decision in place of the law in matters both civil and ecclesiastical: " Hor volo, sic statuo, slot i)ro ratione voluntas." And hence those calamities which oppressed and over- whelmed two of James's successors, Charles the first and James the second. XXXII. A Comparison made between the modern and ancient Subscriptions and Oaths. Those famous Royal Letters, and Three Articles*, • As, however, this Address in its present form may be read by some, who are les-s conversant with these matters, or may not have RO ready and easy means of reference, it has been deemed advisable to add the 'Hiree Articles here : I. "That the Kings majesty, under (Jod,isthe only supreme Go- vernor of the realm, and all otlier his Highness's dominions and countries, a« well in spiritual or ecclesiastical things or causes, as trm|>ora1,nnd that no foreign prince, person, prelate, or potentate. 61 it is unnecessary here to set before you, gentlemen of the University ; they are well known to you : there is not much of them, as you well know, but they embrace many points ; inasmuch as they contain not only the oaths of Supremacy and Abjuration, but re- quire an approbation of all matters included in the Church-of-England Liturgy, and an assent to the 39 articles (of 1562,) as in all points agreeable to the word of God. The Royal Letters, as we have said, appear in this work ; and, that we may have the king's three darling Articles always in view, they are set forth in our Excerpta from the Cambridge Statutes. But, not to lay ourselves open to an accusation of rash assurance, and lest the inexperienced in these matters should think that we indulge in empty decla- matioUj and speak not soberly, it will not be foreign to the purpose to take a review of the Letters of James, and the Three Articles, and search into the ancient customs of our Alma Mater ; that, on a comparison of the more recent wdth the most ancient, it may hath, or ought to have, any jurisdiction, ecclesiastical or spiritual, A^ithin his majesty's said realms, dominions, and countries. II. That the book of Common-Prayer, and of ordering of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, containeth nothing in it contrary to the word of God ; and that it may lawfully be used ; and that he himself will use the form in the said book prescribed in public prayer, and administration of the sacraments, and no other. III. That he alloweth the book of articles, agreed upon by the archbishops and bishops of both provinces, and the whole clergy in the convocation, holden at London in the year I0G23 and that he acknowledgeth all and every the articles therein con- tained (being in number 39, besides the ratification) to be agree- able to the word of God. We whose names are underwritten do willingly and ex ani- ino subscribe to the three articles before mentioned, and to all things in them contained. Excerp. e Stat. Acad. Cantab, p. 35. clenrlv ajipi-ar Imvv tl»e matter stands, liefer, then, if vou please, to those doeimients of James's; and do not take it amiss, that we have j)ublished the ancient sta- tutes wliieli bear on the point. They stand thus : Of oaths of Scholars on first coming to college, Stat. 114. " They shall take an oath of all and each of the scholars of the age of fourteen years, and ui)uards, within the term of their coming to the University, viz. /(I f/it/i/ ubtdicncc to the Chancellor *. From inceptors no subscription to articles of faith used to be required. The ancient statute runs thus : A Statute on the presentation of liachelors reading in Civil and Canon law: — "They shall be presented to the Proctors, who shall forthwith take of the same their corporal oath, that they will read and continue the same reading according to established custom." Respecting degrees in general, the ancient Stat. 27 runs thus : — " lie it ordained that no one hereafter in this University be admitted to any degree, unless on his admission he be willing besides to swear, that he will be obedient to the Chancellor of this University, for the time being, and to the Vice-Chancellor, so long as he shall abide in the same." Nor, indeed, from any officer whatever was any other oath required except that which regarded the faithful discharge of his office ; as follows : '* In admission to any office whatever we decree, moreover, and ordain, that no privileged person here- after be admitted to any office in this University, un- less j)reviously to his admission he shall, before the Chancellor, or the Vice-Chancellor, and Heads of the University, take oath to this etiect, that he will faithfully * It is grievous to sny, that at Oxford subscription to the thirty- lini- Articles is even now required of under-graduates. 63 execute that office, and will fulfil all matters appertain- ing to such an office effectually and without fraud." Such were the proceedings of our ancestors. — But as far as regards modern practice, doubtless, you will say, that we are beside the mark a little, making state- ments which are not strictly accordant with downright truth. And we admit this. A young man, indeed, on taking his first degree at Cambridge is now-a-days only required to subscribe himself a bondjide member of the Church of England. This was from the indul- gent concession of the Academic Senate : and, as some think, the Senate has thereby done all that it could do, and that what it has done is sufficient. But to this what do very many rejoin ? They urge, — and we confess that they draw us over to their opi- nion, — that this indulgence savours more of an illusion than of liberality, more of prudence than of mildness, more of wantonness and trickery than of real justice, — that it is, indeed, according to the common saying, a mere distinction without a difference. Why, Are not all in statu pupillari — as they are wont to put the question — required to use according to custom the forms, and creeds, and prayers of the Church of England ? Are they not bound to receive the Lord's Supper according to the rites of administer- ing it in the Church of England ? And he who sub- scribes, that he is bondjide a member of the Church of England, what else does he subscribe — only more fully — but that on what as a mere youth he pro- fessed, he is now of an age competent to give his judgement ; that he now in foro conscientice. be- lieves, and in sincere faith professes it.^ To be '■^bond fide member of a church " signifies the same thing as if a person should say, that he entirely receives all the 04 dognuis of that Church, and approves with his w hole heart its discipline and autiiority : so that what he there somewhat covertly acknowledges is in fact the same as what, on advancing to a higher degree, he is under- stood more clearly and openly for himself to declare of the three before mentioned Articles of James ; — though what heforehe had by a sort of shorthand only hinted, he then brings out with a bolder shading and a firmer outline. Add to this, that each and all of the Thirty-nine Articles are then to be subscribed in the lilcral and grammatical meaning. So much for these matters. We hope, that it has been gathered from these observations, that it does not discuss the question with reference to those who are about taking clerical orders: another species of argu- ment should be used in that case. We do not meddle, in the smallest degree, with sacred matters : let those enfrag:e in affairs of the church, whose concern it is. This little discourse is wholly concerned with the Uni- versities. Nor let any one inquire of us how all this can be ? bv what arts and arguments can a young man, employed in other studies from his boyhood to youth, and for the three preceding years with you ; j)ursuing his own or following the pleasures of others, or however else engaged, very little devoted to theolo- gical learning ; how he can become so skilled, so ready, so religious, so expert in unravelling minute theological points, that of a sudden he should start forth, as if Jiewere fit to wield the sceptre in the realms of Theology ? It is not for us to resolve these ques- tions ; but rather to propose another, more simple, but at the same ti(ne more serious : Upon what Ai'THOKiTV are these restrictions imposed.^ A ques- tion to which we fear that Hooker himself, of power- f)5 ful judgement, or the great Warburton, or the inge- nious Paley, could not have given a direct, satisfactory answer. We, on our part, find an abundant supply of mate- rials, as 'well in the nature of the subject itself, as in the reasonings and arguments of others, not silly up- starts, not worthless fellows and rash disturbers, taken at random and zealously pressed into the cause ; but those who rank amongst the learned and most weighty, the warmest lovers of peace and reHgion : these men seem to stand by us, and voluntarily lend us their friendly aid. Furnished with the arguments, and en- couraged by the authority, of such men, we seem to obtrude nothing from our own scanty stock, but to de- rive all from their abundant stores, to draw from the fountain of their pure consciences. And thus, indeed, near forty years ago, in the days of our youth,'.did we act with these gentlemen of your University. And truly we ought to thank Almighty God, that we made those efforts, with whatever success, at that turn of life, when the conscience is usually more tender, the mind less engaged by worldly considerations, and, if it be worse furnished with experience and example, is more stubborn in its purpose, and not easily shaken and turned from its object. Again, then, we main- tain, that these Subscriptions are neither " Consistent with the Natural Rights of Mankind, nor with the Pow- ers of the Human Mind, nor with the Principles of the British Constitution, nor with the Precepts and Doc- trines of Christianity" *. What is strange is often true. To one who recalls ancient practices to mind— of these we; h.ve given examples, — it will appear, that these academic sti- pulations, which are called Subscriptions, were the * The title of a book first published in 1789 : 2ncl edition in 1/92. F nu>re wisely settled by our ancestors, the more simple thev were in their matter ; and, when they were less joined and connected with things not generally pertain- ing to arts and faculties. In every thing there is some natural peculiarity, some particular relation, to which appropriate arguments and counsels are to be applied : and it were very much to be wished, that, when any change in customs or mantiers took place, on such occasions a salutary advance had been made, and that admirable course to all excellence pursued, which we arc used to style a Reformation — or, if you like, a dis- union from the sacerdotal dominion of the Pope — and an appropinquation to that true Republic of let- ters, civil, general;, and national, about which we per- ceive that some amongst us make no little bustle. But what is the case? On a close inspection wc fear, that in some of our movements we shall plainly seem to have retrograded, or to have turned from bad to worse;' as though the Reformation looked more at Property than at Religion. Erasmus wasaccustomed to complain, that oaths among the Christians of his time were more rigorous, more abundant, and, at the same time, treat- ed with more levity, than among the Heathens, and that those who took up the profession of the seven liberal arts unbecomingly, swore rather according to custom than according to conscience : and, in his re- proof and condemnation of these tricks he speaks at some length. What would he have said, had he seen ihem grow more abundant in our Protestant Uni- versities, than they were in the Catholic ones of his time ! What if he had minutely dissected our Sub- scriptions, and had weighed them according to each proposition sworn to, with his peculiar sagacity ! Who would not wonder, that our University, at the time when it was more ecclesiastical, nay Popish, was more ■ 67 liberal and more civil ; and, when it became less eccle- siastical, became less civil and less liberal ! The change in ancient practices, in this point of discipline, is to be regretted. For though, we admit, that alert driver, the Pope, always kept the reins in his own hands, still he slackened them as he went over this ground. Might not our Alma Mater, in the presence, as she was, of men well versed in our laws and institutions, have justly answered to King James, attended by his coun- sellors and flatterers, and offering his dearly beloved Articles with his own hand, " Moribus antiquis stet res Romana !" Might she not, proudly conscious of some of her customs, have indignantly exclaimed for herself and her sons : *' We are unwilling that the Laws of the University should be changed T'' XXXIII. The University not an Ecclesiastical ^ hut a Lay, Coiy oration. In addition, it must be observed, that our University, according to modern opinion, is lay and civil, not ecclesiastical. Nor may it be said of this opinion, that it is unsound — t'lnnit ; inane est. This is no asser- tion of ours : the thing is perfectly clear, and openly declared in the King's Courts. The words of a writer, who at Oxford itself delivered publicly many very excel- lent observations on the English Universities, strongly bear on this point: "All these corporations — Col- leges," — says Blackstone (i. 18.), "are, strictly speak- ing, lay, and not ecclesiastical, even though composed sometimes of ecclesiastical persons only." The same will apply more strongly to our Universities, which are nothing more than a union of colleges. Chief Jus- tice Mansfield makes use of nearly the same words. Tliis being the case, why should we force young stu- f2 G8 dents, beiiii; laymen, -ind literary associates, to act as if thev were ecclesiastics ? It is nearly the same as to require of those who apply to be admitted members of the Academy of Painting, to play an air on the hprp, or of the Antiquarian to cut a caper, or of the Theolo- gian to turn an epigram. Let Pythagoras remind those who were going to enter his mathematical school of the principles of (reonietry by his motto : Tlie inscription in that case was properly charac- teristic, and placed as a warning ; but such exclusion is improper in the instance before us. Some Demo- critus, if he wished to make us laugh, might com- mend us to the Montpelier College of Physicians, where the students, as we have read, used to be re- quired to declare that they had not been artisans, and to bastardize themselves, l^ut in this business we must act gravely, well knowing what many of the wisest among you, what all belonging to foreign Uni- versities have thought of these Subscriptions — that they are a sort of monster, — the " man's head upon a horse's neck," of Horace, — uell worthy of being ranked among nature's prodigies. XXXl\\ doinparlscm between modern English Uni- icrsitics, Foreign Universities, arid a?icient Acade- mies, with respect to Tests — Oaths. It appears, then, from our ancient Statutes, — nor docs any thing in these Privileges make against it, — that particoloured, and alien subscriptions were not imposed by our ancestors. Such was formerly the condition in which our Abna Mater stood, as yet a stranger to these oppressive burthens. Those who have toiled in the vineyard here, laborious workmen, 69 and well experienced in University matters, after hav- ing radically searched all things which hear on this point, and minutely, as one may say, dissected and ex- amined them, seem to have found out and hrought to light nothing which countenances this ruleof discipline. Without doubt it is clear enough, that our Universities had particular powers vested in them, to quiet, put down, punish, and expel, the contumacious and rebel- lious ; but in our search for truth among these theolo- gico-literary thickets, we could not find, thatthey exer- cised the pitiful casuistry, of imposing articles of this sort, or had a sophistical and cabalistical power to con- demn as aliens, and eject from their society, such mem- bers as refused to sign them. The Christian world contentedly, perhaps, and too carelessly, slumbered at ease on the infalhbility of the church ; and before any one was admitted into the priesthood, he would be examined on various points as to life and doctrine ; indeed, a student in Theology would have entered on a particular course of study, as with us ; all which is, perhaps, reasonable and natural, as in that case his views were directed to the church. For the regimen and modes of foreign Universi- ties, we instance the French, German, Italian ; and it may be allowable to adduce the Spanish also. Each of these was termed a general place of study, of which, as it seems, the Parisian was the most ancient. With some pride on this score, its learned historians Duboullai and Crevier give their testimony, that this was a national University, and that privileges of the Faculties, as they are called,— namely. Theology, Law, and Physic, — were less ancient than of Arts and Na- tions (so styled), that is, collegiate assemblies from different provinces. And among these you may look in vain for such-like sacerdotal and imperative stipu- 70 lations, and j)nvileges granted on conditions of sub- scription. The same account is given of the University of Vi- enna, which was styled " the Archigymnasium of all Ciernianv, the mother and nurse of the most excellent learning and knowledge," by far the chief of the other l^niversities of that age. On the plan of the Parisian, it had its four Nations, of Austria, the district of the Hhine, Hungary, and Saxony ; each choosing its own Proctors, and voting according to the rank of the Faculties. We have heard similar accounts of Co- logne, the Athens of Germany, the Colonia Agrippi- /ic/isis, where at a remote period — in 1388, — a Uni- versity was erected, " for the common good," formed on the same rules, and endowed with the same rights and privileges, as that of Paris. In like manner, as it appears, the Italian Universities, of Pisa, Bologna, Padua, and Sienna, were founded. On the same plan also were the Spanish, at Salamanca, Seville, and else- where, called Cu//cgf06' nuij/ore^. They were, we confess, afterwards wretchedly subjected to the power of the Inquisition ; their books were exposed to the IjI' ilex iLJ-purgatorius ; and the Universities themselves, as those before mentioned, yielded obedience to the decretals and bulls of the Roman Pontiff. The nation was one, and, as itnow is, Catholic; very different from ours, in its present state, which has been most justly styled by Voltaire a Nation of Sects. But, however these evils might exist, — and evils most certainly they were, — they were ecclesiastical, and not academical : — and even we have had our Inqui- sitions for heresy. Courts of High Commission, and Star-Chambers, which have nothing to do with our present question. For unless it appears, that in en- tering upon, and proceeding, in degrees, and undcrtak- 7\ ing j)rofessorships, other exercises, other requisitions, other oaths were proposed enjoining what was not ex- clusively proper to each, — as arts to the graduate in arts, laws to the lawyer, medicine to the physician, theology to the theologian, — if this does not plainly appear, the question falls to the ground, and our argument prevails. That those matters at the commencement were so laid down as we have said, is confirmed by what afterwards ensued in foreign Universities, and was made known to all. Cardinal Bentivoglio describes the state of the Universities of Douay and Louvain, and calls the latter the most ancient of all in Flanders, and eminently devoted to the Sacred See : of theological compacts of this sort, however, he says not a word. How free the Palatinate was from such discipline is shewn by a letter of Lewis Fabricius of the Academy of Heidelburg to Spinoza, by which the Elector of- fered the Professor's chair in the University to that celebrated philosopher ; and by the answer of Spinoza himself to the illustrious Fabricius : an invitation truly worthy of the Elector ! an epistle worthy of a Christian ! a refusal worthy of a philosopher ! But how idle all this, how fruitless, nay, how nearly unin- telligible, if to obtain the professorship, those impo- sitions must have been submitted to, which are en- forced in this country ! Who can be ignorant, that it was customary of old, as well for the English and Scotch, as those of other Protestant countries, to become students in Catholic Universities, and to graduate in them ^ Our celebrated Harvey, at the age of nineteen, was a student of medicine at Padua in the year 1602, and there took his degree of Doctor. In a similar way, Andrew Balfour, a very famous Scotch physician, having devoted himself entirely to medical studies, and 72 liaviiio- uiider^^one examination by each of the Profes- sors, first took his degree of Ikchelor, then of Licen- ciate, and afterwards the highest, of Doctor, at Caen in tlje year 10(11 . A\'ith what ardour, indeed, and in wluit crowds, students flocked to the University of Paris from all parts of Europe, and how ready the Parisians were to accommodate them in the arrange- ment of their pecuniary expenditure, Crevier clearly and triumphantly informs us. Nor was Cambridge less liberal of old : and also at the revival of Utters she invited learned men from other countries, and enrolled them in her records, as well for the sake of receiving their aid in her studies, as giving them a share in her honours, her privileges, and professorships. Such were Bucer, and Fagius, and the learned Erasmus. The latter, as you know, — before the mandates of James had interposed their authority, — was made Margaret Professor of Divinity in the year 1510, and according to custom, had pre- viously taken the degree of Master of Arts, or Doctor. Of the former, one was professor and teacher of Hebrew; the other, of theology : and the bones of both rest in your University. And thus iimch concerning the Academies of Eu- rope, and of the course pursued by them in conferring literary advantages, and degrees on foreigners. But, whileweare speakingof ancient Institutions, wecannot but have in our recollection, in what honour both you, and the other European states, hold ancient Greece ; concerning which, perhaps, so far as respects the va- rious fortune of literature and the habits of their schools, we should have known more, if time had not envied us a hook, ascribed to Aristotle. But from that ccle- biated Funeral Oration preserved in Tliucydides, we know enough of Athens, — the most liberal nurse at 73 least of the Arts and Sciences, if not the inventress, — to be assured, that their academical institutions were, so to speak, general, in the most liberal sense, Uni- versities. With respect to that Athenian Oath, — on which Bishop Warburton has so strenuously exerted himself,- — and the argument dependingon it, they are, if we mistake not, to be referred to magistracies, pub- lic offices, and civil rewards which were to be obtain- ed ; and with respect even to these, as it appears to us, Warburton's argument will not in all things hold good : but with respect to academical honours, and all the advantages, means, and opportunities for lite- rary improvement, it does not aflfect them in the slightest degree. There was a conflux of people of all nations to the public schools of Athens : and, in- deed, having " a (Jiti/ ivhich was common lo all na- tions^ — 7nv 'ToXiv Koivriv TuoiyjjVTzg, — and not excluding even their enemies from their military schools, — wherein they might even have learned arts which they might employ against themselves, — how could they have expelled their own citizens from their aca- demies for the arts and sciences ?" Of the Romans, on such particulars, little, per- haps, is to be known, but what we learn from the wri- tings of Cicero. From them we gather, that the first literary exercitations of the Romans agreed with those of the Athenians, the philosophical schools of the former with the academies of the latter ; and the let- ters received so freely and liberally from the Athe- nians, the Romans could never have delivered with a sparing and illiberal hand to their own people. For the Romans were before all things influenced by the love of liberty, a participation of honours and privi- leges was rarely disjoined among themselves, and never to be violated with safety : to foreigners, in- » .74 lUetl, they were for i\ long time illibeiiil, but, at length, tljev conferred military rewards on them, and bestowed the rights of citizens. How then could they have denied them academical accommodations ? I5ut to what does all this tend? To exhibit, not a levity of words, but the weight of facts; not the rash- ness of athrmation, but the dignity of argument; not the boldness of conjectures, but the force and autho- rity of examples ; not, lastly, to oppose ingenuous men, consulting for the public good, but such as consult for the interest only of themselves and their party, pray- ing, at the same time, the great and good God, that \vo may be able to distinguish between kings merely regal, ruling by their own authority, and kings poli- tical, ruling with a parliament and law ; and that we may rightly discern at how great a distance kingcraft often lies from true wisdom and common experience. Let every king and every magistrate governing po- litically a free people have their appropriate authority and honours. But in these, as in all human affairs, a certain moderation ought to be preserved. Though, indeed, we are not ignorant, with what stupefaction kings were accustomed to be approached by their subjects. The French exhibited their king, Louis XIV. as that perfect prince, whose image Xenophon had l)ictured in Cyrus ; and our people proclaimed James L as Solomon, and placed him next to Jesus Christ. Oh! you flatterers, you servile herd, that surrounded majesty! Oh! priests, who offered before it the in- cense of abomination ! Oh! philosophers, who en- snared tlie connnon people with crafty words, causing princes to run mad with high-sounding titles ! James was evidently loo much a mere king, — ruling by his own authority, — not a political king. He lived in those tiuKs, iu which the nations of Europe, having set aside 75 those illustrious examples of popular liberty, and le- gitimate society, which the Greeks and Romans had set before them, had been reduced to a savage and barbaric polity. What man, with any character for understanding, would now venture to say of such a prince's mandate, as this relating to subscription, that, like the laws of the Medes and Persians, it should never be set aside? Of those Oaths, with which, as with so many thorns, these Subscriptions are hedged round, we are unwill- ing to speak, whatever we may think, too seriously, not professing the Cabalistic or Casuistical science. On this subject are pendent many knotty points, of which not choosing to attempt the unravelling, we leave to those who are curious in the civil law, the ancient canons, and the decretals of Gregory. - But we are speaking here as Englishmen ; and, as such we venture to maintain, that an oath, though ta- ken under any particular authority, is not valid ifi prajudicium juris siiperioris, in opposition to, and to the prejudice of, a higher law and authority; that, if it is lawful for any one, in any case, to take an oath from mere form and custom, it is more worthy of endurance in a case, where merely natural and ci- vil rights are sought; and, that if he does not act reli- giously who takes the oath, the authority which im- poses it acts far more profanely, than he who, perhaps, with something of inexperience, complies with the forms of it. We solemnly, and with the strongest feelings of conscience, protest, for ourselves, against all such-like Subscriptions; leaving others, while things continue in their present state, to their own judgement, and to their own way of expressing it. We ask not, what we should think of those who comply with these Sub-. scriptions and O-dihs pro forma, but what of that public autlioriiv, which suffers civil iiiatteis to be confounded uitli rehgion ? what of that polity, which invites, which urges, which, we had nearly said, in some cases compels, these Subscriptions and ihxths pro fonjui 9 XXXW ()/ the Political and Religious Character of James I. And, in truth, these Oaths and Subscriptions will de- rive no weight of authority, were we permitted to look narrowlv into the habits and manners of those who first exacted them. On what James's religion was in foro ro/iscicnticr we form no judgement, and make no inquiry. What he was in the common intercourse of life, his friends were ready to testify; nay, the king himself testified, with what levity, with what familia- rity, with what impiety, he was in the habit of using the sacred name of God, — that name which the Jews thought it almost blasphemy, in their common inter- course, even to mention — a practice, which is held in horror bv most people, became with him an ordinary habit. \\Miat sort of a man he was in the presence of his people, and in the administration of the king- dom, is sufficiently known to every body, by his public acts. While yet in Scotland, he lived in habits of the greatest familiarity with the Presbyterians, and courted the Calvinists; when in England, at a time when Episcopacv was got into vogue, and Arminianism was beginning to be poj)ular, he paid his service to the Episcopalians. Vet did this same man, by commis- sioners sent to the Synod of Dort, persecute the Dutch Arminians with great fury; nay, he would not suffer his own clergy to exi)ound in their literal and gram- matical sense what they had previously with an oath bubscribcd to in that sense. What must be said of his regard to his coronation oath? It appears to us, if what that good cliancellor Fortescue assigned as the true reason why some of the kings of England made war, as it were, against the laws of the land, was applied to James, that some- thing must be subtracted from his religion and his re- verence for an oath. For as Henry VIII. and Queen Elizabeth had before governed the people of England by proclamations, acts of supremacy and dispensing powers, so did not James by his imperial mandates, by his ecclesiastical courts, his constitutiunes cede- siasticcc, and canons? And, further, to one, who seriously considers the state of the kingdom under the Tudors and Stuarts, and with what facility the public religion underwent its changes, we fear it will appear, that the age which we are apt to call the reforming and " fanatic," ought to re- ceive something of the mark of impiety, as ages, which did not " reverence an oath," as ages, which rather trifled with religion. For it is manifest, that the public worship of those times was too political to be called religion, at least such a religion as reigns only in a pure conscience. The public religion had in the course of a few years undergone, as it were, a revolution three or four times, and was soon to undergo other changes. So that, what Erasmus exclaimed of his age, we may recognise as applicable to these : "Sift well the articles which aresworn to, andthepersonswho take upon them a public magistracy, and so conduct themselves in it, as though they had sworn to perjure themselves. How often do emperors swear, before they receive the sa- cred crown! How often do princes engage in leagues under an oath ! And how often are their oaths broken through by perjury!" And thus much for James, and the morals of his age. 7S WW I. By u'hat RuU' James acted in the above Matters. As \re have all along spoken of James as the sole author of the Order for all to suhscribe the above- mentioned Articles on taking any degree, — which Or- der was delivered in 1^16, — it may be recollected, that there was another rule for subscription, less extended, which had taken place previously, viz. in 1013, appli- cable only to Bachelors of Divinity, and Doctors in each of the Faculties. The form of subscription was the same in both cases; but there was actually a Grace brought in for the latter, and it passed into a Statute, so as to have, at least, the appearance of the legislatorial authority of the senate. But all this be- gun and ended, as the Grace indeed expresses, in a Koyal Letter. It was all settled under the king's sole authority: the Grace, therefore, and the Statute were matters of course, mere formalities, as the king well knew, and the senate were not ignorant. \y\\.\\ respect, however, to theRule for all Graduates to subscribe the three ^/r/;-//';/^'- Articles of James, this seems to rest with the Royal Order exclusively. There does not appear to be the semblance of the legisla- torial authority of the Senate accompanying it. There does not occur, at least, any trace of a Grace or Statute in our Book of Privileges giving it the sanction of the senatorial body, which doubtless there would have been, had any such instrument been no- ticed in the Proctor's Book. 15ut, indeed, James knew that there was no want of it. It was enough : the king had given the Order. The truth is, James felt, after all, on what ground he stood, that the University was established in the prin- ciples of the civil law, and was to be governed by its 79 forms; and he gave ample proof, as well by his public proceedings, as by his private amusements, — as in his encouragement given, before the University, totiieonce celebrated Latin comedy of Ignoramus, — how much to his taste were the principles of the civil law. He felt and acted as king of the University, and thought, that he possessed the supreme visitatorial power of every par- ticular College, and of the University generally. And it is manifest, by his ReoOviJjCihov zccorzoouvTig, they may triumph ! We seem to see that excellent man present, with his eyes fixed, and his fine ingenuous countenance, with firm intentions, but the most benevolent feelings, standing now before the Senate, and presenting the Grace — as he formerly did present it — in due order, as follows. " Placeat vobis^ ut illi, qui immera schnlast'ica in reg'iis statut'is contenta explcverinty in posterum sihi concessum habeant gradum in aliqua facuUate susci- pienda, etsi tribus articulis in canone tricesimo sexto comprehensis non subscripscrint ;"" a Grace this, well deserving to be written in your Book of Graces, and which, or something similar to it, will certainly be inserted there at some future period. For, though we may not defend any Utopias of our own, and though we are but little skilled in soothsayers' lore, — of some such Grace as this — whoever shall have the honour to introduce it — we venture to speak prophetically : " '^ - Venient annis Secula seris, quibus oceanus j Vincula rerum laxet, et ingens Pateat tellus, Tiphysque novos Detegat orbes, nee sit terris Ultima Thule " XL. QiucrCy as to the Right of administering the present Religious Test. Still, however, it does not escape us, that at the time, when the above Grace was agitated, some uni- Sf) versitv-men spread about rumours, that the Senate had not the power entirely to abolish the aforesaid test; although, provided it preserved the spirit, it might somewhat alter the letter ; that it was thought, in this respect, limited in its capacity, being bound under a salvd resrid auctoritate. To this it is rejoined by others, advocates for the pri- vileges of the Senate, that either it had no authority for altering the letter of the test, or that it possesses the power of extinguishing the spirit of it, and of annihi- lating it entirely. But, say they, this learned assembly possesses both. They suppose, that the Senate made the antient statutes, and has the power of making new ones : and that, as there is no statute of the Senate — as we have already noticed — which has enjoined this test, on all graduates, no person, acting in anv official capacity, has any right now to administer it. Further, it is urged, that as the Mandate was deli- vered by an arbitrary Prince, in times bending with servility, for local and temporary purposes, without any legislatorial sanction, and, apparently, in defiance and mockery of the University Senate, — that such a man- date has not now, and indeed, never had, any legal force; that it should, in the present period, be treated as a mere obsolete form, and ought long since to have been buried in the oblivion, to which other unseason- able practices are now consigned, in the Colleges, and in the University. Happy would it be for us, if this public nuisance, this national disgrace, could be disposed of so easily ! But as, notwithstanding the liberal aims, and honourable wishes, of many enlightened, good men, tliereare likely to remain others, who, under pretence of fears for the EstabH.>hed Church, of respect for the Government, ^nd of j^ecuring the Privileges of the Universitv, would 87 still make objections to any further attempts at refor- mation, we shall proceed to take our more comprehen- sive view of the authorities concerned in it, and inter- ested in its due consideration. XLI. On the Powers of the Senate and Heads. Certainly the Senate is " the Council of all the Colleges, of all the Arts and Sciences, of the whole University" ; and, as ye know, " the Chancellor with the consent of the whole" — as the Statute, de Officio (Jancellarii^ reads — "has the liberty of making new statutes, for the improvement of learning and the pre- servation of what is becoming and honourable among the students" ; — yet with the proviso, " that they de- tract nothing from the Royal decrees, and impede not the operation of them" : —so that amidst the Act for bestowing privileges on the Senate, the vox impe- ratoria is distinctly to be heard; the claim of the Prince is paramount; and by the spirit of Elizabeth's Charter, her two bodies of Statutes, and all the Royal Instru- ments downwards, including those of Charles the Se- cond, — the Chancellor and the whole legislatorial as- sembly are distinctly subjected to the royal autho- rity. With respect to doubtyui md.tttrs, the Statute runs thus : *' If any thing doubtful or ambiguous arises in these our statutes, and sanctions, it shall be explained and determined by the Chancellor and majority of the Heads of Colleges, by whose determination and interpretation we will that all the others abide." Hence it is clear, that the Senate can do much, — if the Caput will but give it leave; for, from what has already been said, it appears, that it can do nothing, unless the Caput permit it to consult in common. 88 Ami \vc have already collected, that the greater part of the Senate was favourable to Mr. Tyruhitt's Grace, that the Vice-Chancellor was certainly not averse to it, and that the Chancellor himself very greatly approved it. But, forsooth, the Caput inter- posed it'< " Veto." In like manner, when Dr. Ed- wards wished to propose in 1787 his Grace for abolishing Subscriptions, that most troublesome Ca- put entirely frustrated his intentions. We have thereby been taught, with all due re- spect for that learned body, the Senate, not to rate it beyond its proper faculties and strength. By the Royal Statutes, it is clear, that some things it has no li- cence to do, though it should have the will ; and by the Caput's " Veto," there are others — as we have already said, — nay, that, without the permission of the Caput, it can do nothing, whatever it may wish. Since, then, ihere are some doubts, some difficulties resting on this subject, we leave other persons to form their own judgement upon it : let us only be allowed to admire such academics, as have been for wrenching, as the saying is, the club from the hand of Hercules. In the Government there is certainly an authority, which rises superior to that of the Academical Senate, — the authority of ihe High Court of Parliament of the United Kingdom. This, as they think, can sup- press these indecent restrictions, can remove these most offensive grievances, can entirely unloose these most dishonourable fetters. In that I\Iagjni7ii CoJici- liuin Rcgni, say they, it is certainly vested to support in due form corporations in their just rights ; but, at the same time, it most certainly belongs to that Court to see, that the members of those corporations do no injury to the state. There may, perhaps, be among you some, who 89 from respect to the Academical Senate, and, at the same time, to the Supreme authority of the Em})ire, could, in a spirit of moderation, wish, that the two authorities would combine their individual strength ; and, that after a conference and consent made between them, and the abolition of the present formula, they would supply its place, by one better suited and accom- modated to the nature of the case, referring only, as in former times, to Academical obedience, or to the Arts, Sciences, Faculties, and moral Character. XLII. The Office and Duty of Supreme Visitor. But, be these matters as they may, every authority claims its proper weight. " In appeals in University causes" — as they are called — they are Judge Mansfield's words, — " after application to the Court of King's Bench, the cause returns to the University Statutes, if it relates to the University ; to the Colleges, if it relates to the Colleges : and the decree of the Visitor is final." So great is the power of the General Assembly of the University, and of the Visitors of Colleges. But with submission to this great man, — and it does not escape you, — besides the ordinary authority of the Senate and Masters, or of the Chancellor, Vice-Chan- cellor, or of Visitor, whether he may have been a Bishop, a Legate a latere of the Pope's, — as formerly, — or the Chancellor, or the King himself, in the office of Founder of any particular College, there is a power superior to all these, which does, in fact, give them the faculty of moving at all, and can repair its strength when it begins to fail. This is like the muscles of the human body, which excite the different parts and members to perform the proper functions. This is, as it were, the spirit ; and, when even life seems to 1)0 fail, this can restore it, as its Creatrix, and last hope ; .... opifex rerum, et, — Deo favente, — mundi melioris origo. This must be all understood to be spoken of that t\v- traunUnary authority^ which claims to itself the pre- rogative of creating, of reforming, of restoring things, of repressing great injuries, and of removing great opprobriums ; namely, of that last resource, which is called, the authority of the Supreme Visitor. There are, doubtless, many now dispersed over Britain, and probably not a few residents in the Uni- versity, according to whose wish it is, that this su- preme authority would honestly and officially apply itself to this course, which has been so long post- poned, and lost sight of. For it can scarcely be ex- pected, that the Caput of Five just now mentioned, which, a few years back, brought forward its most of- fensive " Veto", would act less obnoxiously in future, unless it should please the supreme authority to inter- fere. Should that be favourable to reformation, they think, — nothing is clearer, — that the Caput would soon give their unanimous vote for it: though, indeed, should this authority interfere, it would act without supplicat- ing, and without wanting the good will of the Caput. Concerning this authority some disputes were car- ried on formerly. Some affirmed, that as Societies and Corporations derived from the King the origin of all their privileges, so does the office of Supreme Hsifor of right now rest with the King — sitnply regal, or monarchical, not political, with a Parliament, — or a legal, limited, supreme magistrate. To this point go the arguments of a writer, who in defend- ' ing James II.'s proceedings at Magdalen College, Oxford, wrote a long Dissertation entitled, "The King's Visitatorial Power Asserted ;" 1088 : and the 91 University of Oxford itself had in 1647 enforced the same argument. Others thought, that this power belonged of right to the King, hut to a limited one, with a Parliament, not to a simply regal or monarchical one ; while others again, referred it to the Supreme authority of the State, wherever it was lodged. On this latter side of the question was the famous Mr. William Prynne, Barrister of Lincoln's Inn, formerly of Oxford. He laboured to prove, that this authority resided in the Supreme authority of the State — in the Parliament ; — and Prynne himself had been appointed by Parliament Commissioner, for visiting the University of Oxford. Prynne, however, was not averse to a King, so he was not an absolute, but a limited, one, as is clear from his very elaborate speech, delivered in the House of Commons, for entering into a treaty with Charles, and from his Tracts on the Supremacy of Parliament. In the Book of Privileges, traces of this power are frequently recurring : the office, indeed, itself is not distinctly mentioned, as the other offices are both in the statutes established, and in the course of the business executed by the officers ; though it is to be known and distinguished in momentous periods and dangerous occurrences. But let us trace the truth of this matter a little more closely to its source. It will, perhaps, appear to those, vvho but curso- rily peruse the Book of Privileges, that the Charters, Bulls, Indulgences, Concessions, Letters Patent, or by whatever name the several public Instruments are called, which confer Privileges on the University, are to be derived either from Kings or Roman Pon- tifTs. Of those derived from the Roman Pontiffs, since the Act for the Incorporation of the two Universities has set them aside, we stop to make no remarks, nor 02 of any created by the University : and of those received from our Kings, ue must speak with some caution. Tlic particular period of time, and the course of proceeding, under which many of these Privileges were first granted, cannot be recognized and discern- ed very accurately. Some of them — like other matters which relate to the early beginnings of many human transactions — are involved in darkness, and can be spoken of only from conjecture, and uncertain know^- ledge. This, however, is clearly to be understood, that most of those Instruments were prepared at a period, in which, as is well known, the nations of Europe every where, and among others our own, had been subjected to the Canon and Civil law : for among us, from the time of Stephen for 200 years downward, the Civil law had been in high repute. All that was to be found of learning rested with the priests ; and even that consisted almost entirely of the lloman and Canon laws. Some of them were, how- ever, doubtless formed before the Civil law had been admitted into this country. Manv of these Instruments were made in those times, which have been called the irregular periods of the English Constitution. The Privileges shew thcuiselves more clearly in the times of Hen. III., Edw. I., Edw. II., Edw. ill., and Rich. II , but are not spoken of as then first created or bestowed, but as al- ready existing ; relative to which periods, there aremany disputes about Parliaments; periods, in which some of the nobility, wlio had been cited by the King's writs to one Parliament, were, perhaps, not summoned to the succeeding one, and were ever afterward omitted ; and the names of all cited were sometimes omitted, so that their names are not now known. On these and other J>ul)jects many controversies liave been agitated, as 93 there have been, and still remain with some persons, doubts concerninf!^ the origin and power of the present House of Commons itself. It is, liowever, deserving notice, that many things, . which were done by royal patent in those times, as though by the royal authority alone, were really done in parliament, although in the public instruments there is no mention of such acts : but what parti- cular academical privileges might be so granted, we shall not stop to inquire, nor, perhaps, would it be easy to ascertain. This, however, should not be passed unnoticed, that instances occur, in very early times, in which the authority of parliament is more clearly seen in matters relating to privileges, and petitions are presented to parliament from the University, as from a society or corporation ; though for our own parts we confess, that we are not of those who approve all things granted, whether by the royal authority, or en plein parliament. It is, however, certain, that the Act alluded to — 5 Rich. II., and others might be mentioned — was not only passed in full Parliament, but was introduced with the greatest solemnity. And such things seem duly to indicate, that our Univer- sity is not to be considered, so regal, as not at the same time to be parliamentary ; nay, rather that it is, and ought to be, as well under the government and autho- rity, as under the protection and guardianship, of Parliament ; and all this may be equally said of the University of Oxford, and similar examples might be produced relative to it. But, with respect to both, we should notice, before all Acts, that for incorporating the two Universities — 13Eliz. c. 29. — For it is well known, that Corporations are made by Parliament, as well as by the King : and, indeed, the King himself in creating Corporations 94 does in reality act not in liis personal and private, but in iiis public and political, character, as a King, with a parliament: otherwise with his i)erson, the King himself — who is also a corporation — would die. And this Statute of Parliament is very suited, as an example, to our purpose. For this, indeed, is the act, as things now are, which creates, confirms and perpetuates, in re, facto, et jwviiue, the universities as corporations ; and we have dwelt the longer in disentangling these knots, lest we should seem here, or elsewhere, to favour the arbitrary measures of James II., bv which he attacked the just privileges of the Master and Fellows of Magdalen College, Oxford — in the exercise, not the violation, of an established duty — that too royal, that simply monarchical principle, in defending which a writer before mentioned calls in this very office of the supre?ne visitatorial power : and we are the more desirous of looking into the sub- ject rather narrowly, to make it the more clear to our- selves, where this supreme visitatorial authority is really lodged, what is its proper character, and what are the services to which it may, and ought to be, applied. Many, no doubt, there will be, more prompt than we are in unravelling this gordian knot, nay, who will say, there is none at all in the case. And every one possesses his peculiar faculty. We are somewhat more cautious ; so much the more, perhaps, as having been taught by certain transactions past some years ago; we mean, when to a petition of many undergra- duates of this university to the Vice Chancellor to abolish, or suspend, their subscriptions, it was replied by him, that it exceeded his power; and when gentle- men, also, of the senate seemed to think, that it did not rest with the senate. We are solicitous about the evils ; uncertain, about the remedies ; while, amidst 95 our much doubting, other cncumstances present themselves to our consideration. For certain it is, that our first charters and bulls are forgeries, and these were made a sort of stepping- stones to others ; nor is it clear, at what time, or by what persons, some of the statutes of our several col- leges and of the university were made ; though it is probable the former proceeded from the foimders or persons appointed by them ; the latter, perhaps, by the academical senate : the rule, therefore, of the law, "that the same power is required for dissolving an obli- gation, as for creating it," must not, perhaps, be hastily applied. Nor, are all things advanced by writers before referred to, to be admitted too soon ; indeed, they are not true. For they say, that no one but the King can make a visitation of the universities ; when yet it is abundantly clear, that bishops, archbishops, popes through a cardinal, chancellors, nay the vice-chancel- lor, and the parliament have made visitations : nor, indeed, is it clear, that more Kings of England than two have transacted business in our universities in the public character of supreme visitor, except by Commis- sioners : of private visits, of course, we do not speak. Mr. Prynne of Oxford, the barrister, already referred to, who was appointed one of the Commissioners for visiting that university, and for his superior acquain- tance with our public writings made keeper of the re- cords in the Tower by Cha. II., has made some obser- vations on the duty of visitor, as also has Lord Chief Justice Mansfield, as above ; and each according to his respective office. The latter in his "Decisions of Civil Causes," is speaking only of the special and local vi- sitor, who over each college presides as judge. It was not his business to form determinations on the extra- ordinary^ viz. the supreme visitatorial jwiver^ which 00 rules over, j>i-ovides for, and governs each college se- parately and the university collectively, not less than it does the whole British republic. That is the power, which really creates, confirms, and perpetuates : that is it which removes what is become obsolete, repairs what has fallen into decay, introduces new practices, and can, as it ought to do, adapt all things to the manners, customs, literature, and religion, of an existing people. This authority is discernible in the various pages of the Privileges, but more particularly in those which relate to the abolition of popery in this country, and on its return, durluir the reljrns of Hen.\TII., Edw.VI-./*^ and Elizabeth: aiul, unless we rightly take these mat- ters, we should not be prepared to admit the Legal Uccisio/is cf Lord Mansfield. XLIII. ^ Parenthesis, illustrative of some thi?igs which have preceded, and which may answer the same purpose to what will follow. And here, perhaps, it will be correct to take along with us, that, as the giving of Charters and making of Statutes, the issuing of Mandates, Injunctions, and Orders, beyond the due course, and some beyond the reach of academic authority, as these must be all re- solved into so many examples of the exercise of the suj)reme visitatorial power, so is that power the same, and its effects the same, whether administered per- sonally, or by deputation. AMien a Pope's legate a latere, or an archbishop, as alterius orbis Papa, — as in ])opish times — made a public visitation here, still it was under a permission of the royal authority : and, in the instances just mentioned, all was done, under an authority sj)eclfically granted, pro vice Regis. Thus Lord Cromwell, in Hen. VIIL's reign, the visi- tors InEdw. VL's, Cardinal Pole in Queen Mary's, and 1)7 and Lord Burleigh in Elizabetii's, were all public vi- sitors, for reforming whatever they deemed abuses, whether academical or ecclesiastical. Each did but act as vicegerent of the royal authority, as commis- sioner from the supreme visitatorial authority. In Ayliffe's History of Oxford there are three for- mulas relating to that University, or declarations of the exercise of this prerogative ; one respecting a College, the others the University. The former is entitled Prohibitio Regis, 8fc. (Ric. II.) Archiep. Sfc. de CoUegiis Vis'itandis ; in which, in behalf of Queen's College, he forbids any authority to interfere in the statutes of that College, or to depose the archbishop of York, who had, from the foundation of the College, been appointed its visitor. The King speaks in the highest tone, as supreme visitor, and as one defending his royal prerogative, declaring that all interference in these matters from any ecclesiastical authorities, any disobedience to this prohibition, would be juris sui enervatio, et coroiKB su(e exhcEreditas . Of the two Commissions for visiting Oxford Uni- versity, one is, '■'Commissio Regis Edvardi Sexti ad visitandam Universitatem Oxon : quibusdam Dele- gatis data et concessa'"' This Commission, delivered plcnissima et summa auctoritate per absolutam et regiam potcstatem,'' and executed "■ vice et auctoritate Regis," extended to mo- rals, to the abolition of former Statutes, and to the giving of new ones, to the application of certain of their finances, to the re-establishment of the study of the Civil law ; in short, to every thing implied in a thorough reformation of all the Colleges and of the University. The other Commission was issued in the name of the Parliament, and is entitled ''Citatio Delegatorum H 98 Parl'uuncntorum advisilanihna Acadeimmn^' and wns dt'llvered, " v'lgure cujusdam Spec'udis Orduiaiwnis Siij/renur Ciir'uc Par/iamcnti jmn sedeftfis,'' this being tht-Mi the ruling j)o\ver ot the empire, and in that cha- racter possessing the supreme visitatorial power over the Universities. Of these Commissioners the famous William Prynne was one ; and it was in the defence of the Parliament, in this character, that this learned man wrote his Tract on the 6'//yj/*6';/?e Visitatorial Power. This Citalio is a summons to the Masters, Fellows, Scliolars, and all the officers of the place, to appear bt^fore the Commissioners in the House of Convoca- tion, ob jiionnn rcfornuitioncm^ ejusdcmque AcadcimcE, dcb'itain rtformat'ioncm. No notice is here taken of any specific alterations, though certain ordinances were made, and it was in the contemplation of Parlia- ment to give a new body of Statutes to both Univer- sities. XLIV. Some Things in the Privileges, i?i their Origin illegal, though since conjirmed in the gross by Aet of Parliament. — Complaint of many Aca- demics against the present Polity. — The real Querela Cantabrigiensis — which i^eqidres the In- terference oj the Supreme Tlsitatorial Power. But to leave our digression. — You well know, Gen- tlemen of the University, that many eminent men among you, as well of tlie profession of the law as of divinity, and Oxonians as well as Cantabrigians, have thought, after well considering the matter, that some things ordained, both with respect to private Colleges, and the University, were illegal : and they were so unquestionably in their origin : and we should con- sider them so still, did we not recollect, that they 99 were since confirmed by Act of Parliiunent, and that your literary Corporation possesses some pec?fiia7'iiies. P^or on comparing together what Chief Justice Mans- field advances on Universities specially^ with what he elsewhere decides of Corporations gcneral/ij, in civil causes, we fear it will be found, that there exist, in the courts of the former, some matters, which are scarcely reconcileable with our Common law, or with the Civil : suffice it to refer to him, where he says, " He" — the visitor — " does not proceed by the rules and forms of the Common law, but he suffers a party allcgare non allegata^ probare non prohatar But these, and other things of the like kind, we leave to the judgement of such as excel in juridical literature. With respect, however, to such things as fall more properly under our consideration, this distinguished per- son, we confess, places us, — as the saying is — between sacrum et saxum. There were, it seems, certain men of St. John's College, who thought that the power of the visitor of that College had been extended in too arbitrary a manner to two engrafted Fellowships, and it was impeached in the Court of King's Bench. There was another question argued relating to a Fel- low-Commoner, who had been expelled from Queen's. In the arguings on these cases, the advantages of a ^^ Forum Domesticum" the visitor's court, were much insisted on, and the necessity of its powers being absolute, — not, after judgement given, referrible to the King's Courts — "that the Statutes could not be admit- ted as evidence to impeach the sentence, and enter into the validity of it there ; that the King's Courts, if the Visitor does not exceed his jurisdiction, — by which we suppose him to mean, if he acts within the rule of the Statutes, or bye-laws, — have no cognizance, no super- inducement; but that thevisitor is theonly person to be H 2 100 njiplied to, and moreover, tliat his jiulgement is final." 'riiis was Lord Mansfield's decision ; and theCourt seems tohave been of the same judgementnith his Lordship. Now Corporations have the power of making bye- laws, which, however, should not be contrary to the Common law, the common benefits of trade, the parti- cular interests of its members, nor to the general rights of the commonalty ; and, if they are, they may be su- perseded by the King's Courts ; and we have several ex- aujples in Lord Mansfield's Decisions, pronouncing bye-laws of Corporations to be null and void. Still it seems to be different with respect to Colleges and Uni- versities. These, as we have seen, are civil Corporations; and theirStatutes, Graces, Decrees, Mandates, and the like, are its bye-laws, by which they are regulated and governed. And, not to notice how the privileges of the L^niversity have encroached on those of the town and Corporation of Cambridge, it would be no difficult matter to produce instances in which some of its own learned members have thought their /^ro/^er/y invaded; in which the right of private judgement has been en- croached on ; in which the liberty of the press has been, in their persons, violated ; and the liberty to instruct youth has been subjected to a licence : of such-like cases examj)les in abundance could be produced, in an- cient as well as more modern times, — to pass over those of more common, more general concern — yet if there should be any Statute or bye-law, shewing it to be of academical usage, and the visitor decides according to that, his decision is final : there is no appealing to the King's Courts, no legal remedy : Lord Mansfield's Decision seems to amount to this, — And here it may not be improper to add, that one of the most pro- minent, and, at the same time, the most objection- able features of the present Academical oeconomy can- 101 not be reconciled to an Act of PaiTrainent, passed in Edward the Sixth's reign ; yet there is a statute for it, and it is supported by a separate Rule of Elizabeth's, and academical usage *. But, as to the manner of managing such arguments, we leave that to other persons ; we leave them to com- plain of those Statutes, — whether in private Colleges or in the University, — which they may have thought to bear hard on themselves as individuals, or on parts only of your literary Corporation ; of Statutes, contradictory to each other ; of some covered with the rust of antiquity, yet many in number, and to be sub- scribed by all, who are members of your Collegiate Corporations, and of the larger Corporation of the University, and at Oxford, even by many Inhabitants of the city, — on these subjects, Oxford and Cam- bridge gentlemen, as already remarked, have written their thoughts. Such matters being too various to be treated of here, we pass them over; as also such things, — whatever they may be, — which being hedged round with a regia auctoritas, may be placed out of the power of the Senate, of the Masters, Visitors, and the King's Courts : passing over such-like matters, we shall confine ourselves within our own limits, which are sufficiently wide. For our cause is that of inge- nuous youth, of Undergraduates in general, and in- deed, of the whole Academical body : it is, or ought to be, the real Querela Cajitabrigieims. For does not, as some of the most excellent men of both Universi- ties have often asked, this question relate to the pro- gress of philosophy and polite literature, to the pre- servation of civil liberty, to the restoration of Univer- sity-discipline, to the probity of the morals in youth, to the grace and majesty of the University, and even * For the celibacy of the Fellows : in opposition to the Act of Edw. VI. allowing ecclesiastical persons to marry. 10-2 to tlio dignity of the state ? finally, does it not, they ask, relate to the authority and strengthening of sin- cere religion, and the purity of conscience, which ought to he consulted, and, hefore all things, to he preserved ? Those persons have not scrupled to call our present Suhscriptions, no less justly, we fear, than emphatically, Q-orj^ccyju kcci \oi?oii.(iyja. And they have further testified, that such impositions do not injure only particular persons, and particular counties,— as Oxford and Camhridge, — hut all the other counties of England ; as, if any one will go over the subject, he will readily perceive. For streams from these English Acade- mies, as from springs, being poured forth, flow widely abroad, and whether salutary, or pestiferous, as their course is daily increasing, overspread the whole nation. And, shall we say, that there is no tribunal, before which such a complaint can be heard, where it can be remedied ? But such a power there is, if it would but exercise itself ; and this is what we have called the Supreme Visitatorial Power over Academi- cal Corporations, for the purpose of liberalizing them, according to the light of the times, and of reforming existing abuses. Every office hath its peculiar character : and this now mentioned, is that of the judge, whose duty it is to end these strifes If thatQuinqueviral Caput should continue in future to pursue the course, which hitherto it has pursued, it will be an luipcriuni in Iniper'io, a society distinct from the Senate, different from the Corporation, raising itself above them and beyond them ; it will t)e enabled to wrest from the hands of the Senate all liberty of action, so that should they wish to abolish our Subscriptions, they would have no power to do it : but should the Senate have the power and not the will, they would thrust a dagger in tlieir own bosom : and, in either case, it becomes the 103 duty of the supreme visitatorial power to support the Ropublic of Letters. This power itself should inter- fere in our Academic Councils, not by petitioning and supplicating, but by ordaining and putting an end at once to such abominations. And let not these expressions be thought to savour of asperity, and as being those of one who has forgot- ten the respect due to the Senate, and who now grow- ing severe has forgotten also his former concessions. I5y no means. In the present state of things, whatever it may be, — we must repeat, — may he who believes our 39 articles subscribe them, and enjoy the full benefit of them ; and let him who subscribes, without believing them, know how to avail himself of the alle- viations which may be offered to him : but, as we must beg leave also to continue repeating, the thing itself admits of no concessions, is entitled to no indulgence. Whatever respect we may owe, and feel for persons, none is due to injurious usages and arbitrary mandates. And, if we are not greatly mistaken, the whole course of the business, in which we are now engaged, involves in it, not only what is an evil in itself, but what is full of mystery and perplexity. For, what if those ingenuous youths, before mentioned, had petitioned that supreme visitatorial power? — with whom, we doubt not. it rests, entirely to abolish these grievances — might not some persons, in their zeal for Acade- mical discipline, have rejoined, that these same young gentlemen should be directed to the Statutes and Aca- demical authority, to which, at their matriculation, they had already subjected themselves ? Add to this, that if any two, or any twenty-two members, of this Aca- demical Corporation should have appealed either to the King's Courts, or to this very suj)reme authority ; might not such persons as are versed in the maxims 104 of the civil law have iiri^jed, that two, or twenty-two persons, are not the Corporation itself, and that a University or Corporation can only act by its Syndic ? On Well weighing, therefore, these nice points, we feel ourselves to rank with those, who betake themselves to the spontaneous, self-moving energies of this visi- tatorial power, as to a city of refuge. Judge Blackstone, as all gentlemen of the Uni- versity know, has written much on Universities and Corporations, and has spoken also of visitations : and how luminou>ly, how elegantly, how copiously, how learnedly he has commented on the Theory of the Enirlish Law, it is not our business to descant : but he was an Academical lecturer, not a reformer, nor an investigator of that peculiar office, which we have called, supreme visitor. This for certain was not the end which that admirable lecturer had in view; nor perhaps did it belong' to his office to consider it. How well soever he has written on our Universities, and however admitting, as he does, the legal defect in its constitution, yet being in the very presence of his yllma Mater ^ it was more to his purpose to admire her learning, and to add to her literary stores, than to revive old Statutes, and impugn her established Privileges. Now the present question does not relate, as we have stated already, to the office of the Visitor of Private Colleges, either general, or special, filling the places of their founders, nor of the Metropolitan ; nor would it intrude upon the authority of the Se- nate, in giving some new Statutes, and interpreting others. On these matters it was not meant to raise any doubt ; the visitors have their proper courts, their proper jurisdictions, — as also have the other autho- rities, — and that, provisional causes excepted, as we have seen, is smnmary and final ; though even that 106 power is conclusiva per legem, iwn contra legem : and there are cases, in which the King, witli his Coun- cil, or the supreme visitatorial power of the kingdom, rises above all visitors, and acts alone. We propose returning to this subject, after some observations to be introduced in the next chapter. XLV. History of Universities. — Short View of the Royal Statutes. — Alleviations of their literal Strictness . To our Statutes some allusion has been made already, though we pi-ofesscdly abstained from going into details : nor do we propose now to enter into particulars : but they are grounded on a similar au- thority, and are of collateral obligation with our Royal Mandate and 39 Articles. The rules, too, which direct them, are likewise in the Book of JEacerpta, which is in all our hands, and are bound on all our consciences. There appears, therefore, to be a na- tural connexion between them : so, to avoid leaving a chasm in our narrative, and not to fall too abruptly on our main object — on which, when we arrive at it, we shall dwell at some length, — we shall here take a view, though a very short one, of the Royal Statutes. Those institutions, which we now call, mysteriously almost, with a charm annexed to the word. Univer- sities, were nothing else in their origin, but societies, to which, according to the Roman civil law, it was permitted to hold certain properties in common, to have a common chest, and a Solicitor or Syndic, through whom, what was to be transacted and done, might be transacted and done : from whence they were called Corporations. Of those Societies, or Colleges, or Corporations, which, when increased and collected into a body, and, as now, by an appro- 106 prlate and peculiar name denominated, Universities, we have attempted to speak more at large elsewhere. Suffice it to ri-Muark in this place, that such insti- tutions, however at tirst made up, existing, as they did, in turhulent times, and acquiring strength more bv fraud and superstition, than by true religion and just authority, grew up sefisim sine scnsu. For in addition to that influence, wliich the name of a Corporation naturally brings with it, Religioii also added its own proper weight ; and, though antiquity, wliich had involved all things in darkness, may among other things have rendered the first origin of the Pri- vileges, Statutes, and Offices of the Universities ob- scure, this is clear, that certain privileges were granted to ours, and that Statutes were in ancient time given to it bv kings, popes, bishops, chan- cellors, and founders of colleges, or their represen- tatives. These, at least, all had their appropriate prerogatives and jurisdictions ; and the king in a superior, and more emj^hatical sense, had his, as in a certain sense, the founder — he having formed them into Corporations — of them all. This state of things went on progressively, in the monastic, and, as they are called, the dark ages, in which philosophy and the elegant arts were in a lan- guisliing state, in which few could either write or read, wh.en even the most learned would say, " It is Greek, we do not understand it," — when the civil and canon laws were in full force in the courts and schools, — till Duns Scotus, the most obscure Doctor, appeared the greatest Theologian ; and Aristotle — scarcely, indeed, to he called Aristotle, being so latinized, mutilated, and corrupted — became the greatest philosopher. From these fountains were derived that learning and tir.it ])hilosophy, together with those Privileges and ^ 107 Statutes, corresponding with them, which flowed down to Camhridge ; and she hence seemed to her- self Academ'iarum maxima ; while science, the real science of antiquity, growing pale, as it were, through a length of years, and scared by a dissimilitude of man- ners, — as if a thick body of clouds intervened, — suf- fered a long eclipse. This darkness the neiv learning did in part dis- perse. Customs, hitherto held in veneration, fell into disuse ; and thereupon Statutes more accommo- dated to the existing state of things were required in our Universities ; and, as the old ones, so covered with obscurity, and contrary to the new learnings reached the time of the good youth Edward VI., the preface to the Statutes made in his reign rightly begins with declaring, " that the ancient Statutes are ob- scure, unintelligible, se?ni-barba7'oifs ;" and that others, more intelligible, fashioned more according to the condition of the times, and to the practice of the new learning, became requisite. All this was agreeable to that natural and just prin- ciple, " that when manners change, the laws also should change," both in our Colleges and Universities. Various innovations were accordingly introduced under Edward, Mary, and Elizabeth, both in our Colleges and Universities ; and, at length, under the latter, that code of Statutes which now remains en- tire; some old ones having been retained, others purged and new modelled, while other old ones were rendered altogether null and void, and many new ones incor- porated. This code of Statutes, being an improve- ment of her first Statutes given in 15.59, Queen Eli- zabeth put forth under the Broad Seal ; but they were not confirmed by Parliament, as most of our charters are (Eliz. c. 13), supported 7'egia auctoritatc, Eliza- 108 beth proceedln^^ in this body of Statutes on the same principle, and bv the same rule, as Justinian in the Institutes: '' /// has (jiuititor libros easdcm Listitu- iiones purtiri jussi//N/s ; iit sint legitiincr scitnticc prima ckmenta ; in (juibus breviter cjposituni est, it quad antta obtincbat, ct quod postca desuetudine inuinbratuin impcriali roncdio illusti'atinn est ;" for, adds his annotator, " /ucc clausula conjirniat Insti- tutio7ies, et cas habere vim legisjubet."" These Statutes, however, were not properly accepted by the University, they witY^ forced uj)on it. From this short view may be seen how great the subject under consideration is. For in this collection of the Privileges of Cambridge, appears the code of Queen Elizabeth's Statutes, together with all the other public instruments relating to the University, and which retain their present authority in it; upon which questions not a U^\\ and some of no light moment, have arisen among many learned and good men, worthy, as they have thought, of the consideration of the supreme authority of the state. We, too, have been sometimes almost led to think, that this little Dissertation ought to have been prefaced in different words, and, however humble our situation maybe, to liave been addressed to that supreme authority. Be that as it may, the matter now stands thus. — If in the reign of Edward VI. the existing Statutes of the Univer^ity were thought deserving to be set aside, as being, on account of the change which had taken place in our literature and manners, obscure, scarcely intelligible, and almost barbarous, — do not tlie Sta- tutes given by Elizabeth now nearly come under thq. same predicament ? It must be granted, that there are many things to be fouiid in them, which ought to be still kej)t in view, and are useful still to gentlemen lOD of the University ; being such things as come into daily use, and are necessary in the discharge of public offices and the performance of public exercises ; but with respect to other matters, they are many of them of a very different kind. Are not the studies now to be pursued, the lectures as now read, the manners and cus- toms, together with many things, which relate to forms, to times, and places, very different now from those which are presented in this Book of Privileges — on public lecturers — on the times of lecturing — on the books to be read — on the hearers of public lectures — on the course of studies, — and on many other subjects ? But what shall we say ? Oxford and Cambridge writers have again asked, Are there not many things in those Statutes, which, according to modern usages, are now scarcely to be understood, and are in a man- ner barbarous ? Why should we use many words ? There are those, who accuse these very Statutes of levity, as made too much under the influence of pri- vate passions, and as partial, intruding on property, and private judgements, and at the same time as cruel, impracticable, and nugatory, requiringbricktobe made without straw; and of such-like charges the writers al- luded to have given examples in abundance. Thus have argrued many, who have wished to see our Uni- sities thoroughly reformed. But if Statutes which are now become antiquated, cannot be entirely abolished, they ought to be revised and repurged; so that old laws may no longer be at variance with modern manners, like tares among wheat. For admitting, say they, that our ancestors derived those benefits from them, which they had in view, we should consider that which was done, enough, for the time, and well done : but the end being answered, what can be more inopportune, what more absurd, and full of madness, than still to llu offer them to ncceptancf, still to perpetuate them, still to sanctifi/ them ! "They are deair — granted some of tliem are truly so. Should we then say of dead thiui^s, as of dead men ; mortua non conv'it'ianda ; de mortuis nil nisi boman. Hut these dead things can come to life, and, as occasion offers, have sharp teeth. As an example of what might be said on this head, we remark, that a member of one of our largest Col- leges observes, "that there was not a single Statute among those of his College, in which there was not some one clause or other, which is not truly, or which can be, observed:" and elsewhere, speakingof the terms of a certain oath, he adds, " that it consists of nine pa- ragraphs, which if you except two, or at the most, three, the verv best men could not fulfill." And this, if we recollect right, was the College, in which one of the Fellows — one of the seniors, if we mistake not — urged, in a sermon * preached in the College Chapel, that there was a Statute of their College in direct op- position to a University Statute, and both given by the same Elizabeth ; so that if he obeyed the College Statute, he incurred the penalty for violating the Uni- versity Statute ; and was, indeed, liable to expulsion both from the College and University. Hut with complaints against these Statutes let us unite congratulations. For here, as in the ordinary per- plexities of life, with serious, substantial difficulties, are intermingled temporary, accidental alleviations. No man surely is expected to perform impossibilities: and, in the j)resent case, palliatives have been discovered for the evils, which have not received a perfect cure. Some Statutes are allowed to pass into just oblivion, by long • It should be, in Extracts from the University and Trinity CollcGfc Suilutes, prefixed to a Sermon, &c. By Robert Gam- ham. H.D. 'Jndedit. 1794. Ill disuse, and the general consent of these corporate bodies; and others by positive abolition, or by the qua- lifying interpretations of the Masters of Colleges, are now considered either as modernized and ameliorated, or as entirely set aside. In the matriculation oath, there are provisions, somewhat Hberally made — quantum jus fas que est, andquantu7/i in me est, — as also in the oath of the Inceptor in Arts, were it not marred by that senseless, impracticable clause — "Uujus Acade- mics statum et dignitatem /?/6?<^or quoad vivam ; meoque suffragio atque consilio rogatus et non rcgatus defen- dam."" But, to speak the truth, oaths of mere form — as this kind of oaths is commonly made and consi- dered — seldom become the rule of future life. Con- science takes no interest, and feels no trouble, about them ; and, should Subscribers, in some after-period, have any secret misgivings, they may be reminded of that just rule of the civil law— the law of the Univer- sity Courts — that an oath taken in any particular court has no obligation in pnejudiciumcuri^superioris : and, we suspect, that the laws of reason, of common sense, of the civil code, and the law of the British Constitu- tion, will give their verdict against any unintelligible, impracticable law in our Statutes. But, after all, should they at some future period entertain any doubts on the purity of these Statutes, and venture to open their mouths against them, they may take refuge in the Vice- Chancellor's ecclesiastical absolution ; which is here copied from the interesting trial of Wm. Fiend, A.M., who had been accused in the Vice-Chancellor's Court of publishing a libel; and it was delivered by the acute defendant into the same Court in bar of sentence : ^^ Absolutio in Fine Termini. — Auctoritate nobis co?nmissa, vos absolvimus ab onrni negligentia, foris- factione, seu transgressione statutoriun, privilegio- \V1 rum, et consuttudinum, ttDco et san-arnentis Ecclesicr vox rfslitfiiniiis in ?w?nlf/e Uci Patris, ct Fil'n, et Spiritus Sancti. This Absolution does not occur in our Book of Pri- viKp;es, nor in owv Ed cerpta e Stafiilis ^^IrademicrCan- tabriij^ieKsis, nor in some otlier books of Ceremonies, relating^ to Cambridge : this we must consider a de- fect ; but, as is well known, it is regularly and offi- ciallv delivered. The provisional grace 171 cautclarn jurantiiint ct levamc/i is found in most of tliem. But enough of the complaints against Statutes ; and, perhaps, more than enough, though in their pre- sent state they are a great evil. Our complaint is of the greater evil ; which being more prominent in ap- pearance, and more pernicious in its influence, ought to receive our primary regard and most conscientious consideration : " Why should we sin, and mangle ev'ry line In rev'rence to the sins of thirty-nine ?"' Pope. But, before we take a view of the specific na- ture of this evil, — by an investigation of the meaning of certain articles contained in the Rcgiinn JManda- tinii — let us briefly consider the doubts and difficul- ties, which are in the way of removing it. XL\ 1. — Doubts, relative to the Right of abolishing Subscription. Here it does not escape us, that our observations on the supreme visitatorial power have already run out to a disproportionate length, and, perhaps, may be a little circuitous : but, as we have confessed, that they were entered upon more with a view to satisfy ourselves, than to inform others, there will be less call for apologies. W'e are for ascertaining where the jurisdiction resides which is capable of suppressing an 113 evil: and it already lias appeared, tliatuVice-Chancellor, — in the case of petitioning undergraduates, — declared it did not rest with him — that certain of the Senate have insinuated, it was not vested in them — and, that the Caput — as we have seen — has the statutable pre- rogative of coming forward in limine with precocious resolutions, and positive preventions. Hence, then, doubts may have arisen in our minds ; and, if there is any room for them, they have not been removed, nor diminished, by what a learned academic, the late Dr. Parr, by letter, not long since avowed to us, — '* Our Universities require a thorough reformation — I think as you do on the subject of Subscription — but the cause is hopeless^ Now where any doubts may exist, on the right of interference in correcting abuses, there may naturally arise difficulties and delays in the way of removing them . But whatever doubts there may be as to the limits of the Senate's rights, and whatever difficulties from the obstructive prerogative of the Caput, there can be none on the absolute, independent right of the su- preme visitatorial power, however faint the expecta- tions in any quarter may be, or whatever difficulties may be thrown in the way of its timely regard and successful application*; for, as formerly brought pro- minentlv forward to public view, it bore on it the stamp of royal authority. Further: The civil law principle — Initium et Finis legwn a voce prhicipali procedit — is certainly the basis of our present Statutes as a code of royal law, and the civil law process predominates in our Courts, with the exception of some things peculiar to these singular establishments: still on considering, that an Eriglish King was one, who did not act without, but under, the authority of law, who ruled not mera regia pates- I < 114 tate that this nation had from time immemorial its ConcUiurn Magnatum, its ConrU'ium Rcgni — that, in the Saxon times, this Council sat in the same house with the King, — and that, after the Conquest, the greater harons still continued to form the King's Great Council, though called up then hy a particular^ as they had formerly heen by a general, writ ; — taking all these circumstances into consideration, we may pre- sume, that our ancient Kings, in adopting any great^ measures relating to such-like literary Institutions, would act not altogether in their own name, but with the advice of this their great Hereditary Council. Further : Although the word. Parliament, is com- paratively of late usage, the thing was of very remote antiquity ; and our Universities come into clear light under the third Henrv, though their origin is veiled in some obscurity : but in the reign of Edw. I., — Henry's immediate successor, — that is, when towns and bo- roughs were first directed to send Kej)resentatives to the Great Council — as the Knights of the Shire did — two for each County, there is then fall proof of the Parliament's jurisdiction in academical transactions; as particularly in the ''Petitio Unive7'sitatis in Par- liaiucnlo facta,'' Sec. ; and even accompanied with a non obstante Prohibitione ; cui 7'espon.su7n est, sicut habct Universitas Oxoniensis, sic habcant. In the reigns next following of Edw. II. and Edw. III., we have various Aria in Parliamcnto, relating to the University, coram nobis ct Concilio nostro, &c. These were issued with the usual royal signature, Literrr Patentcs, teste ?neij)so ; and, as it appears that letters so signed were yet frecpiently passed in Parliament, though not declared to have been so, it is probable, that other royal instruments relating to the University were of a similar kind. And the Act for 115 incorporating the two Universities passed in the reign of Queen Ehzabeth, — who yet made such a flourish with the royal prerogative, — fully shews, that in lega- lizing and protecting these literary establishments, she knew the weight, and felt the force, of an Act of Par- liament. This, too — a Parliament — the good people of England have always been accustomed to assert, and to this in their emergencies and difficulties have been proud to appeal ; and, since its boundaries have been more clearly marked out and its powers are more distinctly ascertained, it now stands on its proudest eminence, in the progress of the British Constitution, as, the three estates, of King, Lords and Commons, as the supreme authority of the State. It might, therefore, be inferred, that the supreme visita- torial power in our Universities now, in facto, as well as dejure, resides there : and that on any great occa- sion, which would justify their interference, it would be the joint duty of the High Court of Parliament to appoint Commissioners, wise and good men, who might advance such improvements as from the light of the times, and the present state of our Universities, might be thought expedient. Finally: As it appeared, that the University's inter- ests, and the nation's interests are so materially af- fected by things, as they now are ; and, that as corre- spondent duties are incumbent on the legislature ge- nerally, so are there some more particularly attached to the House of Commons. This is, avowedly, a House of the Representatives of the People, and, as such, is, and ought to be, the protector of the rights of every member of the British empire. The Uni- versities, too, send up Members — two for each place — to this House. On recollecting all this, it was natural to presume, that there were some peculiar claims on I 2 IIG lluit House, to consider any mutters, which might be a stigma on their Universities, and a disgrace to the country ; the present Suhscriptions being, we must continue to insist, hostile to the Hberties of their constituents, creating an invidious and injurious mo- nopoly — conferring only on privileged persons lite- rary accommodation and nmnicipal advantages, which ought to be common to all good citizens ; derogatory to the spirit of a free people, destructive of pure and undefiled religion, as being productive of insincerity, and obstructive of private judgement and the rights of conscience. Such are the Subscriptions imposed by an arbitrary prince, and unsanctioned by parliament. Now in the same manner as the Common Law of En- gland takes the precedency of the Civil, where, other- wise, there might be a danger of their clashing, it might seem just, and legal, and constitutional, that an Order of the House of Commons, as representatives of the people, and protectors of their interests, should supersede the arbitrary Mandate of a too imperatorial king. After all, should it be thought, that a mandate, which a King issued, a King only can annul, and that the abolition therefore of Subscription requires the exclusive exercise of the Royal Prerogative, still there might retnain one course to be pursued by a House of Commons, which would be, as in similar cases, to introduce a Hill, for a Petition to be presented to the Sovereign, for a Commission to be appointed to take this matter into serious consideration, and to follow it with proper regulations. For, if an entire re- novation of our Universities may not be expected (though they unquestionably require new Codes of Statutes), still this reformation ought not to be de- layed : this long-continued tax on the human under- 117 standing ought to be immediately repealed : it is im- periously called for : and it may be thought, by what- ever means it should be effected — whether the royal mandate should be suffered to pass into silent neglect, and to rest with the bats and the moles, or be oblite- rated by a Grace of the Academical Senate, or, at once, strangled by an Act of Parliament, or an Order of the House of Commons, or the interference of the Royal Prerogative — whatever course should be taken, if the good work were but effected, there would be left room for mutual congratulations, and the appro- bation of the lovers of truth, of the friends of liberty, of all honest and good men. And these our doubts and difficulties, if they have not brought our feet to stand on holy ground, neither have they led us into the land of Faery : — we have been led by sincerity, and are in search after reality. XLVII. On the Meaning of certain doctrinal Ar- ticles of the Church of England. But, to return to our Subscriptions. Such is the course, which things had taken for some time back — we wish they were now much better — and those who please may call them trifles; but, indeed — nothing is plainer — these trifles lead to great and very serious consequences. Our argument, as it will appear, is but little con- cerned in the truth or falsehood of the propositions to be subscribed : — Why, then, it may be asked, jieed we hold a conflict, concerning the literal, grammatical, and theological sense of the Thirty-nine articles ? And it might be justly asked ; the matter turning upon this ; to wit, that the propositions to be subscribed are out of time and place ; to the condition of the subscribers, and the occasion of subscribing, not at all 118 — to bori ou' a tenii from logic — correlative : or what neccssitv, they might continue to ask, for insisting on the formula to be subscribed, when, as we have shewn above, whether we swear, that we are in truth mem- bers of the Church of Enijland, or to the authoritv of the King's Letters, or to the truth of the Thirty-nine articles, it leads to the same result ? But, whatever course we take, whatever our opinions may be on that subject, let us beware, lest we rather prompt young minds to turn away from the study of truth, than to be forward in the pursuit of it; for, as the proverb says, the well, which is often stirred, and out of which water is frequently drawn, becomes better; but stag- nant waters become putrid : let us beware, too, gene- ral! v, lest we commit an injury on the genius of Bri- tons, who, though at first so covetous of liberty, are not less prone to error ; their genius being not unlike their climate ; ^^Anglia si non venlosa, venenata" But, thus much concerning these matters, which so far as we have hitherto treated of them, have been questions connected rather with economy and polity, than with metaphysics or theology. Yet, though it may not be expedient to divide and nicely cut into parts all the Thirty-nine articles, — which, too, are not con- tained in the Book of Privileges, — and to search into the meaning of each of them, nothing need prevent us from subjoining what follows, which, if considered as an episode in a poem, will, we hope, obtain indul- gence from the reader. The dogmas, contained in these articles, are either doctrinal, disciplinarian, ecclesiastical, or political. Of the disciplinarian, ecclesiastical, and political the sense is sufficiently clear: and, though some of the doctrines are pr(»found and difficult of comprehension, yet the terms of them are simple and one; though, at the same 119 time, it is easily to be perceived, that these, when divi- ded into their various propositions, are not for everyone to understand correctly, and to subscribe heartily, ex animo : this requires a good stock of theological know- ledge, a prompt acquaintance with history, the acute- ness of a critical judgement, and a strict exercise of an upright conscience. But the argument is very different concerning some other of the articles. In these the controversy turns on the very meaning of the terms : for while some persons derive from them the doctrine of Free-will, others can perceive nothing in them but absolute predestination ; while others, leaning to the two doc- trines, use so to interpret them, that those, who are now called by divines Arminians and Calvinists may be held bound and join hands on the same doctrines. In examining this matter, we beg leave to solicit, as before, the reader's candid interpretation of our aims, and not to condemn us too hastily : we must repeat "we judge no man ;" we censure only injurious customs ; we oppose only irrelative impositions. And as illiberality is not the character of the present times, so is it not consonant with our own dispositions, nor with the object, which we had originally, and have still, exclusively in view : the various persons, who re- ceive these Articles, taking different views of them, will, according to their different interpretations and modifications, take a different course, in satisfying their own minds. For certain it is, that different persons have formed, and do still form, very different opinions of the terms of these Subscriptions ; and of the stipulations thereby made. Some have supposed them merely articles of peace, to be taken in a general way, for personal ac- quiescence, and political expedience ; not necessarily 1-20 involving considerations on their truth : others con- sider theni as designedly left o])en, for the discretional interpretation of persons of various sentiments ; others have maintained, that several meanings mav be put on one article, — as, for instance, "On the Descent of Christ into Hell," — which are all true; some insist, that the articles, comprehending what are called, the "five points," are to be understood as Arminian, Free-will (l(>ctrine ; others, receive them, asCalvinistic, Predestinarian ; others again, as just hinted, as a two- fold doctrine, embracing both Free-will and Predesti- nation : some contend thev are to be admitted not, as originalU, ex amnio iniponentis, hut according to the present times, ex aniino administrantis; while others thiidv themselves justified in taking their own interpre- tation of them, whatever that may be. W*i may have occasionally met with persons possessed of religious affections, and favouring peculiar opinions — which too they maintain to be those, which they are re- quired to subscribe who vet have not heartily approved subscribing them. ]5ut they subscribe they sav, with a view to ministerial usefulness, not from a feeling of worldly interest or of political expediency. They think, they can be more useful in a professional line, as public teachers in the Church, by subscribing, than by rejecting, them. The number of those who, as things now are, will take these articles inthegross, as a mere matterof form, will unquestionably be very considerable; nor do we mean to interfere with the rule by which they act, or by which they evade all responsibility and obligation. ^^'e profess ourselves to be of the number of those, who think, as will appear, the Articles more imme- diately under consideration — the "five points" — to be Calvinistic : and so far we consider doctrinal mat- 121 ters ; though we wish it to be understood, that we are I entering on the following statement not so much in a spirit of mere curiosity, not so much from a fondness for disputation, not so much from a desire to elucidate any particular dogmas, as with a view more strongly to enforce, what has been already suggested incidentally, the impropriety, the inexpe- diency, the impolicy, the incompetency and total ir- relevancy of the present tests ; the utter inconsistency of subjecting lay corporations to these theological restrictions ; of entangling the candidates for honours, merely literary, or privileges merely civil, with condi- tions so irrational and disproportioned, with doctrines, so foreign to the occasion, and, in our judgement, so rigid and barbarous. But, leaving others to their own judgement, and not presuming to scrutinize into their consciences, we proceed to our statement. XLVIII. On the Predeatinarian Doctrines contained in the Thirty-nine Articles. In proof, then, that the doctrinal articles on the "five points" are to be taken with a meaning of absolute predestination, or in the Calvinistic sense, as it is now called, we beg leave to submit to our readers the fol- lowing statement. The writings of Archbishop Bradwardin and Wick- liffe, the precursors of the English Reformation, clearly deliver this doctrine. Many controversies, in- deed, they maintained against theauthorityof the pope, indulgencies, transubstantiation, and the frauds of the monks ; but, at the same time, they defended absolute predestination against the free-will of Papists and Pe- lagians ; and from their springs, as is well known, our reformers watered their gardens. No book breathes 122 this doctrine more strongly, than Archbishop Brad- wardin's famous book '' dc Causa Dei." These two tinineiit men were for certain Predeslinarians ; as no less certainly were tliose after them, whom we more peculiarly call, the Reformers. The celebrated Cate- chism put forth by Dean Ponet, under Edw.VL, and sanctioned by the authority of the King and Prelates, gives its testimony to this ; and the Latin version of this Catechism by Dean Nowel under Elizabeth, bears the same testimony. This is also proved by the "//or- muinj^'' and '■'■ Concord^' of Confessions ; namely, that chain of doctrines, by which the reformed Churches mutually bound themselves to unity and unitor- mity of the Faith : all and each of these Confessions breathe the predestinarian doctrines ; and the Creed of the English Church is to be seen among them. This is further confirmed by the very writings of the men, who, under Edward and Elizabeth, were received as the exemplars of orthodoxy: such were, not to pro- duce too many exaniples, that Column of the English Church, Bi!>hop Jewel, under Edw. VI., and that Malleus Ilccrclicorutu, both Popish and Puritan, Ri- chard Hooker, under Elizabeth. Calvin himself does not follow more closely the principles of Predestina- rians in his Inslilutiuncs, than Hooker does in his Sermons at the end of his Ecclesiastical Polity. ^\'hy need we appeal to other examples ? — though others, and those in abundance, are at hand. We have the Thirty-nine Ai tides and Calvin's Institutions now before us. And, as it appears to us, no two eggs can be more like one anotlier, than the doctrines contained in these two compositions. Hume, the historian, one in theological matters, certainly, allied to no sect, speaking off-hand, as itwere, though not without having well weighed the subject 123 before, confesses, that the Reforii^ers were Piedes- tinarians : and most assuredly he is right : nor is Bishop Burnet Jess so : it is, however, in his History of the Reformation, where the latter acknowledges this. For the same writer elsewhere, viz. in his Exposition of the Thirty-nine Articles, holds out — for he was a man of a liberal turn of mind — that the doctrine of Reprobatioi}., however, is not contained in the Article on Predestination : he should have said, ought not to be contained in it. For, good Sir, how will you se- parate Reprobation from Predestination ? As a sha- dow follows its substance, so is Reprobation insepa- rable from Predestination. Calvin acknowledges this himself: "therefore," says he, " if we can assign no other reason, why God condescends to shew mercy to his favourites, than that so it has pleased him ; neither, in the reprobation of others, is any other reason to be looked for, than his pleasure. For when God is said to harden, or to shew mercy on whom he will, men are admonished by this to seek no other cause besides his pleasure." Right, therefore, and prudent, was the supplication of the poor sorry Fellow of Gonville andCaius College, who, after a concio ad clerum preached by him at St. Mary's church, renounced quickly the doctrines con- tained in it, among his other recantations and peniten- tial confessions before the Consistory of Doctors, de- claring "that he was of the same mind, and of the same faith, as the Church of England holds and teaches, on the doctrine of Election and Reprobation, in the Chap- ter on Predestination in the Book of Articles." Fuller has given — in his History of the University of Cam- bridge — this mosthumiliatingConfession at full length, asdelivered inthe pulpit of St. Mary's church, A. 1595. Now, as we have before intimated, this is not the 124 place, either to defend or oppose scholastic and theo- logical dogmas, nor to investigate, whether Predes- tination and Reprobation can be reconciled with the doctrines of Christ and his Apostles, and of the Fa- thers of the primitive Church : willingly shall we now leave the Defence and Refutation of Calvinism to others. But, away with those arguments, which de- rived, as they must be, from the iinperatorial will of James I., the arbitrary decision of Archbishop Laud, and the too prompt interpretation of some learned n)en of that age, would tear away Absolute predestination from the Articles of the Church of En- gland I A\'hat might liave been most agreeable to their wishes, is clearly nothing to the purpose. The Articles to be subscribed, and which were, and are, subscribed are the Articles of 15fi2, which are unques- tionablv Calvinistic. XLIX. IJ'ficrein ahuolutc Predestination differs from thePhilosojildcal Neeessily ^whether of the moderns or (iiu-icnts. flobbes, the great advocate of philosophical neces- sity, as it is called by the moderns, gives the following dtfuiition of it : his arguments we pass. " It is," he says, "the meeting of causes producing an efiect : of which tlie last is, the deliberation and final determi- nation ot tlie understanding concerning good and evil. Among the ancients, Zeno and the Stoic philoso- phers introduced great disputes and diHicult argu- ments concerning Kate, raising clouds, which Plato \\ as not willing to hide, nor was able to break through. He in a manner defended two Fates ; of which one was •' the Soul of the World," ruling all things in the universe, and in the Heavens themselves; the other, 125 that divine, iininutuble law, given for the administra- tion of all things, and not subjecting the human will to necessity. But Aristotle seems to have subjected the Heavens, and even Man, according to his nature, to the laws of necessity. These philosophers endea- voured to untie the foldings of these knots in a man- ner somewhat different. Cicero, inclining rather to Plato's doctrine, admired the divine mind, which rules all things, and, at the same time, defended the freedom of the human will. Those philosophers, who in a later age mixed Platonism with Christianity, made many distinctions and various kinds of arguments concerning Providence and Fate ; concerning the foreknowledge of God, and human liberty, on the divine justice, on the origin of evil, on the present state of pious and impious men ; questions, concerning which, as Boethius remarks, "it is not possible for man to comprehend all the divine proceedings in his understanding, nor to explain in language :" But those Christians, who introduced into their Creeds, a Predestination, which, of necessity, draws after it Reprobation, those Christians, we fear, greatly multiplied the difficulties of these doctrines; among other things, making God himself the author of sin, and at the same time, the inflictor of everlast- ing punishment on sinners, mountains of difficulties, in fact, not to be overcome but by such as can defend the " Justice of God," perhaps his mercy, " in the Damnation of the World*." But so it is. These, forsooth, are the dogmas — sub- * The title of a Sermon published in New England by the ce- lebrated Predestinarian, Jonathan Edwards, and jjroperly enough, surely, republished by an A.M. of the University of Cambridge — Charles Decoetlogon, A.M.-^who once threatened to publish a De- fence of Subscription to the 39 Articles, in the Calvinistic sense. 1 ln; ject to such difficulties and severities, to such doubts, and objections of the most learned men, — these are the dogmas, to which Subscription is to be required : and for what purposes, think ye ? ^Vhy, for admission into an Academy of General Literature*, for obtaining Academical degrees, for the fruition and administra- tion of civil offices. — And of whom are they required? Why, trulv, of youths, but justleaving school, of beard- less boyst, of Inceptors in Arts (A.Ms), in Physic, in Law, in Music ; — ridiculous enough in truth, if it should not be rather called, monstrous ! ^Vhy does not the Professor of Music rather ask his Inceptor to set the Thirty-nine Articles to some learned tune — say, some Grecian measure — than to subscribe them.'^ This would be less irrelative and absurd. But, as the proverb has it, " the bow, if too much bent, may be broken :" or, perhaps, some one may rather choose to say, " that we are for shooting our arrow beyond the mark," concluding from the prece- ding remarks, that we hold Academical honours, that is. Degrees, in too great admiration, estimating them far beyond their real dignity and value. With the permission, then, of our readers, we will briefly ex- j)iain, what good is to be looked for from these Aca- demical Degrees, after saying a few words on Titles. L. On 7^i//cs; and the Jf'ritcrs Opinion of them. Doubtless, it must have appeared to the reader of this Dissertation, so far as it has hitherto proceeded, that it is frequently much out of character, and altogether inappropriate; too free and unrestrained in its style, * It is so at present, at Oxford. t In the liini' of James I. students were admitted of Colleges, and matrinilatc d in the University much earlier, than they are rotnmonlv now. 127 too explanatory and minute in its observations. And so it must unquestionably have appeared to the writer himself, had the learning and intelligence of those gentlemen only been contemplated, to whom these pages are primarily and principally addressed. In an address to such gentlemen, if separately consi- dered, the language should have been modest and un- assuming, the observations more cautious, and less explicatory, the various matters, so familiar to them, being left to explain themselves. But the truth is, although these gentlemen, as being more immediately concerned in the Privileges of Cambridge, were pri- marily, they were not exclusively, in view. It was sup- posed possible, that other readers might peruse these remarks; such as, without any personal interest in the Privileges of theUniversity, or, perhaps, much acquain- tance with them, and other matters arising out of them, might yet entertain kind wishes, and feelings of respect, towards its members, such as, with those affections and sympathies would associate the prin- ciples of justice and liberality, of truth and bene- volence — and combine a regard for the particular pri- vileges of a learned institution, with the general bene- fit of civil society. With this complex object in view, it became necessary not merely so to write, as to be understood, but so as to render it impossible to be misunderstood. The following observations too on Titles and De- grees, though, it is hoped, not so much out of place and character, still require some apology, as being, in part, addressed to persons different from those, to whom the Dissertation was originally submitted ; and, fur- ther, as being, also designed to serve a purpose diffe- rent from the leading one ; viz. : to defend the writer, to whatever censure on other accounts he may lie ex- posed, against the charge of a chaiigeableness in opi- nion, and inconsistency in conduct. For it may pos- sibly Imppen, tliat these pages may fall in the way of some old acquaintance, who may recollect a time when Titles were held in no estimation by the writer, when, indeed, both in theory and practice he disclaim- ed them. It appeared tohim, indeed, that Titles originated in despotical usurpation, in magisterial self-appropriation of authority, or feudal oppression. It occurred to him, at the same time, that however they origina.ed, they were not necessary for any of the useful purposes of natural and civil life ; that they destroyed the unity and harmony and strength of po- litical societies; further still, that, metaphysically and religiously considered, they were, frequently, the very reverse of what is true; and, historically, that they were not countenanced by those who are deemed the most enlightened and polite nations of antiquity, the Greeks and Romans ; always distinguishing, however, such titles as are artificial and factitious from those, whieli are natural and civil ; the merely personal, lio- norary, hereditary, and feudal, from magistratical, official, relative, and professional ; to which might be added such as are occasionally, and incidentally, pro tt')iij)orc, referrible to character : and as these ideas d d not go to exclude that of sovereignty — by whatever name it may be called — in the constitution of governments — neither do they those of true nobility and gentry. The iiiconsistency, then, of the writer, will be thought to consist in a want of conformity of his prac- tice to his tlieoiy. liut, on striking the balance of comparison, it appeared to hiniself, that it would be less inconsistent for one, living, as it were, alone, or 127 filling a very humble place in society, unconnected with any particular sect, to retain the established forms of speech, than, by assuming the language peculiar to a sect, to have made an habitual profession of his ad- herence to that sect, when in reality he did not belong to it, and had no connexion with it: and he must content himself now with hitching himself by the side of poor Erasmus, who could not always make his practice conform to his theories: *' But without joking," says he, " I approve the sim- *' plicity of the ancients, which I wish the very cor- '* rupt manners of our times would suffer us to imitate, " so that we might address each other with the simple ** titles of names ; Cains Plinius to his Calvus wishes " health. What," adds he, " can be more consenta- *' neous with truth and purity ?"....*' So that I am ** the more surprised at those who receive the name ** given to them at their baptism into their ears, as if *' some violent insult was forced into them*." Selden, who has written so learnedly on Titles of Honour, — though, indeed, the history and peculiari- ties of them rather than their defence, — refers to Plato, P * " Sed extra jocum, niihi probatur veterum simplicitas, quam utinam per nostrae tempestatiscorruptissimos mores ubique liceret aemulari, ut nos invicem nudis nominum titulis saliitaremus : Caius Plinius Cnlvo suo S.D. Quid enim erat veiius et purius ? Quo magis istos admiror, qui vocabulum suum, quod ir.ditum est in baptismo, non aliis auribus accipiunt, quam si atrox inge- reretur convitium." Erasmus is elsewhere in the same work — de Conscribendis Epistolis — very sarcastic, though of the Catholic Church himself, on the superstitious titles given to Popes, Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, &c. down to Dominus and Magister ; where, playing off a good deal of wit, he closes with, " Quid, dicent, fa- ciam, si quis, honoris gratia, me vocat Magistrum? Ride, move caput, et desinent te sic honorare, si senserint, aures tuas non delectari titulis ineptis." K 128 Aristotle, and Plutarch, as having written on nobility : the several j)assages he refers to are quoted at large by StobaDus. And it is certain that the Greeks had their j)ride of ancestry, their titles of magistracy, their in- signia of office, their honours, crowns or chaplets of myrtle — and privileges, with right of inheriting estates, and the like. But after all, their noble or well- born — their iuyevug and evTrur^ihg, — were those related rather to good families, who had served and benefited the state, than to merely privileged ones, who had received hereditary titles from their ancestors, and which followed, in the line of succession, to their posterity. Indeed, the principal magistrates of Athens, — the Archons, Sec. — were not only elected by the people, but chosen out of the people. So that, after all, the well-born or noble Athenians stood more distinguished from sojourners and slaves, than from Athenians ge- nerally, who were Citizens or Gentlemen of Athens, \\()'/jTui, A'vh^zg AOr,vuiou Indeed, had they possessed any of those merely artificial and factitious titles alluded to above, it is extraordinary, that they should never occur in those j)hilosophers j ust mentioned ; — the three most copious, yet precise, of all the Greek writers. The same learned person — Selden — also refers to Philo the Jew, as having written a treatise on nobili — •Tif/ JLvyivsiag — but, indeed, it is a merely moral dis- sertation, maintaining, that true nobility, — the same as the wStoical, j)hilosophical, and Christian Nobility, NobilitcLS sola est atque unica virtus Is not derived from rich or illustrious ancestry, but from personal and moral excellence : "For it becomes us," says he, " to reckon those only noble, who are " wise and just, even though they should be born 120 *' of menial servants and slaves bought with money : *' but to those who, though born of good parents, are " themselves bad, let the region of nobility be con- " sidered as inaccessible : for every wicked person is " without a house, and without a city, being banished " from virtue, his proper country, which, and in reality, " is a country of wise men," -/jrig, kui rco ovri, no4 poratloi), to whicli tliose different Companies had no relation." Euffenius liavins here accidentahv used tlie word, Corporation, liad some recollections hronght to liis mind, and lie proceeded : "As to Corporations, gene- rally," said he, "time was, in the earlier periods of com- merce, when they migiit he useful provisions, by giving protection and support to trade in its infant state, when ))rotection and support were required : hut a corporation spirit was in itself never good ; and in ihls more advanced age of socit.tv, instead of afl'ording protection and support, may act a contrary way : it may, and too often does, narrow endeavour, and check improvement: it may, and too often does, break the re- gular links of society, and prove inimical to the natural and civil rights of free-horn citizens; — monopolies, how beneficial soever to some favoured individuals — are, by the operation of restraints imposed on others, public in- juries; and the mischiefs which they occasion, will be in proportion to the extent, in which they shackle or corrupt their own members, and the encroachments, which they make on the natural and civil rights of the community. Never, till nou', did I consider our Uni- versities as endued with a Corporation spirit : but I find they possess a Corporation spirit of the worst kind. I see, in short, clearly enough, that they area too exact copy of our system of government, which is a system of exclusions, according to which, men of the highest rank, of the most extensive property, and, indeed, of all ranks and conditions, are deprived of tlieir hereditary honours and just distinctions, of many natural and civil rights, unless by professing them- selves menjbers of the Church of England, they sacri- fice their own principles, and betray their own con- sciences ; a system of exclusion, which, I fear, we 155 carry further than any nation of Europe, unless, per- haps, we except the miserably degraded Spain. Yet we are a distinguislied people : and considering the high rank we hold among the nations of civilized Europe, we may be in danger of being looked up to as ex- amples ; and our system of exclusions would certainly hold out a very bad example to infant states, such as those which are now forming in South America." LIII. A few Objections to the Removal of Subscrip- tions, at the Time of taking Degrees in any of the Faculties, considered. With a thorough knowledge of the above particu- lars, what are the objections, which men reasoning from prudential considerations are apt to make against the removal of these Subscriptions ; against entirely bursting asunder these chains ? These and other such- like questions we have endeavoured, in our humble manner, to discuss at large elsewhere * ; and it does not suit us to enter fully on the same subject here : we will only now, with the reader's leave, briefly no- tice one or two difficulties, which men are apt to start on this subject. Some are ready to ask those, who are for looking too narrowly into these matters, to consider, how very difficult, how perilous, — nay, in some measure, how impious and profane it would be, to move these ancient Foundations, or so nmch as to touch them with their finger ; and how hard it must be for Academics to weave the web of Penelope, — a work which must surely be, in a manner, one of supererogation, — to give back Donations, to restore Grants, to abdicate Privi- leges, to renounce Charters. But, on the other hand, * Inquiry into the Nature of Subscription^ '2d edition^, 1792. 156 and, lis a previous question, may it not be asked, — dis- misNin^, at the sametinie, thequestion concerningDo- natlons, and Benefactions, and Benefices, which certain persons, whom our objectors mav, probably, have in view, neither covet, nor envy — By wliat law, by what right, could the Founders and Benefactors of Colleges, rush in upon, and appropiiate to their own particular party, — over and above the privileges properly acade- mic, — those advantages and accommodations, which should be common to all good citizens ? And by ask- ing further, whether, indeed, these societies, anciently called Houses of General Literature, were not accord- ing to the state, condition, and opinions of the times, actually national? and with respect to the aforesaid Subscriptions, it has already been demonstrated from our ancient statutes, that our Founders, and our an- cient Alma Mater, imposed no such conditions as are now required. Yet here, perhaps, may be proposed by some Mem- bers of the University, that old inveterate question — which ought long since to have been put to rest, — How, as things are noiv settled, they should be able to defend their Privileges without Subscriptions ? If Degrees, say they, should be conferred without Subscriptions, would not the sons of Protestant Dis- senters, and of Catholics, and sects of all sorts soon make inroads into our Universities ? Such is the pre- vailing opinion now, and was, from the beginning of this imposition. But let us inquire, whether this opinion does not, in the present day, savour more of prudence, than of wisdom. And a distinction should be here made. For the question, which regards the perpetuating of Subscrip- tion differs very much from that concerning its first imposition The Protestant Dissenters, who either 157 send, or wish to send, their sons to these General Aca- demies, are very few : and were you to remove Sub- scriptions at the time of graduating, they would not, ill our opinion, increase much in number, and for this reason, because to most of the Protestant Dissen- ters the prayers, the creeds, and forms of the Church are as little pleasing as your Subscriptions and Aca- demical Oaths. Consider further then. These Protestant Dissenters have had among thein — as they still have — men who love philosophy ; who cultivate polite literature : they have also had very celebrated Academies ; though of these, some, not being collegiated and incorporated, have died with their presidents and tutors, and have altogether vanished. What then if those Protestant Dissenters, those very few, whom we have just supposed — should wish their sons to be admitted into these British Colleges, and proceed in due order through the Academical Degrees? Perhaps, such an intermixture would cause — as it happens in the engrafting of trees — an amelioration of the fruit. For certain it would not injure, but ra- ther benefit, our English Universities. Such an inter- mixture would not draw off from the members of the Church of England what is theirs, and transfer it to the Protestant Dissenters, but would rather draw ad- ditional support from them ; and the revenues of the University might thereby experience rather increase, than diminution ; for, the Protestant Dissenters, who at any time might be desirous of studying In these Public British Academies, are not of that description g{ poor Scholars^ who migrate to our Alma Mater, allured by the hope of Fellowships, Benefactions, and Benefices. Young men of this description, who may be set apart to preach the Gospel, are admitted, ac- cording to their particular creeds, into their appropriate 158 Colleges, or Academies, as into so many distinct hos- tels : and they are there educated and supported at other people's expense. The Dissenters who hecome students in our Universities consist rather of the sons of the wealthy, who, perhaps, may be allured by their love of philosophy, of polite learning, and academical discipline ; whose parents, in favour of their children, may seek to obtain for them a certain privileged fitness for civil and learned professions, an accession of weight and celebrity : for, as they may think, academical dis- tinctions may have their advantages in the state ; and besides this, their property empowers them to become the companions of noblemen and gentlemen : being born therefore in the same condition, they may wish, that their sons may be instructed in the same studies, in the same morals, and the same discipline, to which the gentlemen and noblemen, their companions and particular friends, may have been accustomed. In this order, if we mistake not, has the aforesaid business proceeded, and would proceed again. And what hin- ders, but such persons might form new endowments ? Emmanuel College was, from the beginning, a Puri- tan College. The same things nearly might be affirmed with re- spect to the Catholics. Were you to abolish to-mor- row the present oaths and subscriptions, the Catholics who would enter into these General'ia Studia would be very few. This is obvious from the genius and character of their religion, and for the some reasons nearly as we stated in the case of the Protestant Dis- senters. At the same time what some very learned men have said on this subject, — if we would but listen to them, — cannot be too much admired. They won- der, and truly not without reason, that that very de- scription of men, for whose accommodations those 159 Universities weie intended, and from their very origin, are now, by our irrelative subscriptions and unseason- able oaths, entirely prevented from entering them. Our argument embraces the claims of all dissen- tients, as such, whether Jew or Gentile, and more particularly of those of a religious character. In es- timating the advantages to be derived from our Uni- versities, these considerations should be taken into the account, viz. : that there are certain advantages, which are common among citizens, or which ought to be so ; and yet, that religious men, at least if they are sincere, think that every thing should be sacrificed for religion : to expect, therefore, that such men, for the sake of temporal advantages, should renounce their sacred concerns, is plainly as futile on one side, as actually to renounce them on the other would be greatly injurious : The line of true policy is obvious : it would be found in concession, candidly and volun- tarily made by the reigning party ; not in requisitions, or expecting a surrender of principle, from the more subjected one. This can be done only by abolishing subscription. To one, who looks around him, and observes what on all sides is passing in society, it will appear, that the Protestant Dissenters of the present day are very wealthy : and, not many years since, one sect had it in contemplation to found at Cambridge an Academy or College, if we may adopt that word — which they proposed to consist of a master or president, tutors, and students ; and, as we understand, another sect, very lately formed a similar design in favour of their own party. Whence it happened, that the design of the first was frustrated, and, whether the latter is likely to proceed, has nothing to do with our present business. But, what shall we say ? There are those, — IGO and not of the number of those called nowa-days Ra- dicals — who are persuaded, that liberality on the part of those, u'iio now appropriate the Universities to them- selves alone, would not only tend to their own increase and majesty, but even — that we may not be too full of horrors — to the decrease and weakening of a dis- senting interest*. But, however this might be, those * Among dissentients, — whose cause we have been pleading, — there are some we believe, both Catholics and Protestants, who are themselves no hearty advocates for the removal of Subscriptions in our Universities, nor of the sacramental and test laws, nor of the subscriptions required of the clergy, and of the candidates for Orders : and the reasons are these : they suppose, that these Subscriptions, being a circumvallation round the Church, serve at the same time, for the line of separation to the Dissenting Interest, and that many dissentients would, but for them, go over to the Church of England. In these words. Church of England, Alma Mater, and Dissent- ing Interest,with many others, though of ordinary occurrence, there is something of figure, and a little of mystery. Every conscien- tious Dissenter, as such, is entitled to great respect ; and ought to have no interest but that of truth and justice : and as all honest dissenters ought to be zealous in the defence of their own rights (the rights of conscience;, so ought they to be (and certainly will be) hearty advocates for those rights in others. But the Dissenting In- terest, as it is called, may be sometimes little more than a combi- nation against other interests ; a mere worldly combination, per- haps, in which conscience and principle and religion may have but little concern. No one can plead the cause of civil and religious liberty, with- out pleading that of all Dissenters ; and no Dissenter can plead the cause of civil and religious liberty in his own behalf consistently or Conscientiously, unless he is prepared to plead for it in behalf of members of other communities. We have been pleading the cause of the Dissenters, but we have also been pleading the cause of other persons, and those members of our Universities. And as the great aruumcnt in favour of an enormous evil is the ap- prehension arising from the Dissenters, it became necessary to wrench the club from Hercules's hand, by asserting that such ap- prehension was groundless. 161 same men think, that what is true and just ought to be done, — that universities ought not to have their ports shut, as it were, but, like the sea, should be open and free ; for that " divide and rule*' is the exhor- tation not only of philosophy, but of true policy. There have been other learned men — members, too, of the University — who derive arguments for calling forth liberality, from the nature of these Foundations, from the very quality and condition of the Donations, bestowed on them : for these societies derive their origin, and owe their increase, partly, to public money, that is to say, to the abundance of princes, of nobles, of prelates, — whose property all flowed from the pub- lic stock, — who while living, or when about to die, consulted the public utility ; partly, to the spoils of the dissolved monasteries : many, too, were owing to the beneficence of private citizens, who, having enriched themselves by their own industry, might wish to show favour to the republic of letters, and, perhaps, not be unwilling, after their death, to be publicly recorded among your benefactors*. And why should The Dissenters alluded to above are, perhaps, correct, viz. in supposing that by removing subscriptions from our universities, the dissenting interest vi^ould be weakened, that is to say, that a few sons of rich dissenters,— we have, however, shown, that they would be very few, — would, probably, be entered at our Colleges. But what then ? Is the dissenting interest to be weighed against eter- nal trutli and justice, and the general interests of the country ? And what is the evil of a few sons of our rich dissenters being en- tered in our universities, compared with that mass of bigotry, im- morality, impiety, hypocrisy, and perjury, which by our present system of subscriptions is carried from our universities, and spread all over the country. * We have made it almost a matter of conscience, to say no- thing about the Donations, and Possessions, whether ecclesiastical or secular, of private Colleges, or of the University. But there lately came into our hands a MS. book, giving a full account of M 162 they not have an opportunity of behig so recorded ? A\'hy should not other churches, as well as the es- tablislied Church of England, be permitted to favour their peculiar sect, and, at the same time, either all the estates and possessions belonging to Emmanuel College, Cambridge. This boolv we purchased out of the library of the Rev. Mr. Meen, formerly Fellow of the same. A few things, which we could collect from this book, are noticed here, not through any evil spirit of levity, but for the sake of illustrating and confirming the present argument. Sir Walter Mildmay, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and one of Queen Elizabeth's Privy Council, was a Puritan, and intended Emmanuel College, as the Queen well knew, to be an accommoda- tion, at least, to the Puritans. Sir Walter, himself, gave some things; his brother, Sir Henry Mildmay, others ; some others. Sir Francis Walsingham ; and others,Queen Elizabeth herself : the three prin- cipal Ecclesiastical Benefices — which are valuable ones — were given by that noble person, the Earl of Huntingdon, which, on the dis- solution of Monasteries, fell to the Crown, from the Crown passed to the Earl, and from the Earl to Emmanuel College. Many be- nefactions were afterwards conferred on it by Archbishop Sancroft and by others ; to whicli many additions were made by private citizens. By what right, then, hath any subsequent custom pre- vailed, which, with respect to a private College, is as much as if it should be said, " Let no Puritan enter here ;" and with respect to the University, as much as if it should be said, " Let no Puritan receive Academical Honours ?" With respect to those Colleges, which were founded in Popish times, those without doubt were consecrated to the Cat!:olics. By what right have you, as it were, alienated them ? or, as the Ca- tholics ask, profaned them ? Why have you diverted such waters from their natural course, and inclosed them, as it were, in pri- vate cisterns ? Once more : the English Colleges are a great deal richer, than the other European Colleges. Even of that of Paris Monsieur Cre- vier thus speaks ; " I have said, that the University is poor. Du- ring the course of a long series of ages, it had in common no other possessions, than the Vrt aux Clcrcs, so called, because a part of the same extent of the meadows belongs to the Abbey of St. Ger- main, and was named, in consequence, le Pr^ aux Moines. The University attended so little to any thing which concerned its pe- 103 in life, or at death, to consult for the good of the state ? The principal difficulty in the above theory, and which erects itself so high, as to appear to some Academics insuperable, ought not, as it appears to us, to arise in the minds of members of the es- cimiiiry interest, that it derived no emolument from tliis meadow, which served only for the amusements and sports of the scholars. The city would of course extend itself 5 and the citizens of Paris would in time come to build on this meadow, on finding that it could be made useful to them. Still it consented with regret. Its indifference, however, did not render it negligent in claiming the possession of the bottom of the meadow -. and it has not been less curious in preserving to itself this ancient patrimony, than it has of taking to itself the glory, of holding it by the liberality of our kings." Those who wish to see more on the ceconomy of the University of Paris, may consult Crevier, Hisf. Univ. Par. vol. ix. p. 152. But, it may be asked, if the University of Paris was so poor, whence were the professors and tutors supported ? F'rom the pay derived from the national students ; " d'une multitude jeune gens curieux de s'instruire, qui accourit a Paris des toutes les parties de I'Europe." For the University was not hedged round with Sub- scriptions, and seems to have consisted entirely of a Rector, Proc- tors, Professors, Tutors and Students j — there is no mention of Fellows. ■ With respect to the superior wealth of our Colleges, the pre- sumption is, that a more liberal policy on our parts would rather increase than diminish it. A new interest would be created by it ; whence, it is probable, new endowments of Scholarships and Fel- lowships, &c. would be created. But with respect to the present state of our Universities, it happens unfortunately, that they are less liberal, in proportion to their greater wealth. Yet surely it cannot be reckoned right, to permit one sect only, viz. the Church of England, to enjoy Scholarships, Fellowships, and other Aca- demical advantages, and to eject all the rest from philosophy, from good learning, from Academical Degrees, and the other ad- vantages, connected with them. This cannot be liberal. Nor would it be safe to say, that Catholics and Puritans have thus acted formerly towards Episcopalians. " Si Christianus es, non valet ar- gumentum." M 2 104 tablished Cliurcli, who may be willing to aelinit other sects to the participation of their advantages ; but rather in the scruples of the sects themselves, who may desire their own party to be made partakers of some academical privileges ; who may think, for example, that the liturgy, by which all students and graduates now pay their devotions, is not according to their consciences. But, indeed, there ought to be no difficulty here at all ; in some foreign universities it does not exist ; it does not exist in the Scottish. Do not, therefore, say, that this is a mere sectarian machine ; — for it differs as widely as possible from sec- tarianism, — or some Utopia, which exists only in the clouds ; or a poetical (iurou-/^o[jjvo[jjuyjoi^ a small incon- siderable dispute on a small inconsiderable subject. For, as we have already shown, a true scene is repre- sented; to be viewed both at home and abroad; which leads to matters of the greatest moment : and, as we have heard, there is in the north of Ireland a literary Academy — by whatever name you may choose to call it — honoured, too, with a rinjal grant, with this pro- fessed object in view, that every one should preserve his own religion, and, at the same time, enjoy, without interruption, the fruits of philosophy and good learn- ing. Indeed, there are those, who think, that this difficulty might be easily renioved from onr English Universities, if our acadeuiics would but be just to themselves, and to the state. By any one who looks about the town of Cambridge it will be seen, that many of the sects have their ap- propriate Chapels there. Indejiendents, Baptists, Me- thodists are numerous ; and very lately a new sect built themselves a chapel. The Quakers, as they are called, have a meeting-house there ; though it is now deserted, except at their annual visitations. \Ve also 165 remember, when the Jews held then- little synagogue in a private house. So that every academic might here enjoy, according to his conscience, his own religion, and, at the same time, his own College. Nor should any citizen be deprived of his academical civil privi- leges, though he should not be a Christian. The case is much the same at Oxford. Independents, Baptists, and Methodists abound there. The Catho- lics, too, have a neat little Chapel at Oxford. But, whither are we at length carried ? With what expectations are we impelled ? Or, why are we torment- ing ourselves with fallacies ^ Why are we for deriving our arguments from non-expediency, when that from expediency, as some think, scarcely now-a-days ap- pears ? Or, why are we making complaints and ex- postulations in favour of those, who are without the pale of your church, — the sectaries, as you call them, — when even with respect to those, who are within, to members of the established Church, to academics of the same literary body, we might collect a very ample crop of arguments ? "And, away from you," some one may exclaim, " with idle dreams, with vain and transitory hopes ! What can the questions of such humble persons, as you are, avail, when those of men of high consideration have failed ?" If we have mistaken our object, let it rather be ascribed to our credulity, than to a bold self-confi- dence, or a wanton liberty in the use of language. We have, perhaps, been too much taken with the as- pect of the times, with the fitness of the things them- selves, and the liberal purposes of some ingenuous men, who have wished to benefit, as far as they could, the state. With respect to the present aspect of things, any one, who looks around him will perceive, that various 160 circuinstances in the administration of public affairs have within these thirty years last past been sub- jected to a strict inquiry ; ahnost every place looked into. Our academics have effected some changes, evidently for the advantage of literature, which had been predicted repeatedly, and in praise of which every body now speaks: our legislators have attempted many things for the benefit of the state, and carried some of them into effect : the public records of the king- dom, that great work, have been reduced into order : the military and naval discipline has been examined ; the returns of the public treasury have been subjected more to economy: the secrets of the public offices have been thrown open ; the burden of taxes has been somewhat relieved and diminished ; places full of poverty, wretchedness and crimes, — prisons, bride- wells, hospitals, orphan and lunatic asylums, — have been inspected, and somewhat improved ; the Courts of Justice themselves, not forgetting the Court of Chancery, nor the departments of the first judges, and magistrates, have been explored ; nay, the slip- pery and indeterminate course of Parliament has been again and again exposed, in questions, in pe- titions, in arguments, in speeches. What has not been attempted ? Most things, which seemed to re- quire reformation, and which, within the limits of the l^ritish Constitution, would admit of it, — almost all have either received some positive improvements, or, at least, have passed under a serious examination. Such- like matters have already been briefly alluded to. What then shall we say ? We seem to have fallen on those times, which, if they present us with a mighty nuiss of troubles, present us, at the same time, with men, who have their loins girt around them, and are })ropHrcd, to the utmost of their strength, to repair and 167 restore the republic. It could, therefore, scarcely hap- pen, that we, gliding along with the course of the times, should not, at last, have arrived to that plain, in which we now stand, till we seem to ourselves to hear the voice of that celebrated Locke repeated round us on all sides ; " If Your Majesty does not reform the Universities, every thing will go back again." Besides, there was presented to our minds, that per- plexing, that turbulent, that most calamitous state of things, for many years, among the nations of Europe, in which ours also engaged, and not without great pe- rils ; nor did it recede from them without great inju- ries. We also recollected that solemn appeal; "When thy judgements, Jehovah, are abroad in the world, the inhabitants will learn justice." We have heard, too, the censors and reformers of the times complaining of the public and private morals of Britain, a nation, say they, once the most honourable, the most flourishing, the most happy ; but now terribly fallen ; as though, that which was formerly reputed the best of all, was now, from its corruption, become the worst : — which insinuation, whether true or false, let our reformers tliemselves determine ; but for ourselves, we must say, that the memorable sentiment of Machiavel came into our minds ; " The Prince, who wishes to erect to himself a monument of eternal fame, should choose a period replete with miseries and crimes; that he may apply remedies to those parts, where the disease presses most heavily." And thus far has proceeded our General Disserta- tion ; in the framing of which many things have been advanced with freedom, nothing, we hope, with illibe- rality. Some of them have been derived from our own meditations ; some from the testimonies of others, particularly, of university-men and Cantabrigians; and 108 with this avowed ohject, to speak the truth, that our complaints may seem to have proceeded, not from ourselves merely, but to have arisen in the convictions of academical men, and to have been supported by just and legitimate authority. LIV. Testimonies of learned Men against our pre- sent Subscriptions. To these observations, as also to others, which have gone before, we subjoin, by way of a shield, as it were, the names of some academics, who appear to favour our argument on this subject; among whom are many of great account. Nor can it escape us, how few really eminent men have existed, who, either on account of our ecclesiastical discipline, or the abstruseness of the established doctrines, or in order to preserve a pure conscience, or on account of the soundness and vigour of their understandings, or, lastly, from their love of liberty, have been able heartily to approve such-like formulas; though, indeed, we only seek protection for ourselves : the cause will defend itself. It is clear from the first page of this Book of Privi- leges*, what Hare, who compiled it, with those of his party, would of necessity have thought of our present Subscriptions, had they lived under James; and what that other Cambridge antiquary, Thomas Baker j", did * The inscription to the Index Collcclionum llobcrli IJcirc, Ar- mig.: prefixed to the First Volume of our " I'rivilogi-s of llie Uni- versity of Cambridge." •j- It may by some be considered rather remarkable, that the two learned persons, to whom before all others Cambridge-Uni- versity is indebted for its History and Antiquities, were either es- tranged from its disci])line, or averse to its politics. Mr. Hare was a Catholic ; Mr. Bal.er, a Nonjuror : and even Mr. Cole was said to be more of a Catholic, than a true Protestant 3 and was, there- fore, called by some. Cardinal Cole, somewhat, perhaps, in allite- rative allusion to the celebrated Cardinal Pole. 101) really think, appears not only in those principles, for which he was rendered a Sociiis ejectun, but more in those general ones, which show themselves in certain annotations of his, written with his own hand, in MS. Mr. George Cranmer in his Letter to Mr. Hooker, affixed to Hooker's Life*, says : "the greater part of the learned of the land were either eagerly affected. Of all these we have spoken much and often, in our " History of the University of Cambridge," and in the " Privileges of the University of Cambridge." We beg leave to recapitulate here a few things relative to the two former, for the sake of such readers as are unacquainted with those works. " In the year 15S7, Robert Hare, Esq. formerly of Caius Col- " lege, completed his famous Register of all the Cliartei-s, Liber- " ties, and Privileges of the University and Town, of which the " original is in the University chest. The Vice- Chancellor and " Registrar too have each a copy made by Hare himself." Hare was a Catholic in Queen Elizabeth's reign, when the University was Protestant ; as Baker was a Nonjuror, at the time when the University had sworn allegiance to King William. " Baker left behind him (in his own hand-writing) forty- two " volumes in all; of these 19 were left to the University j to " the Earl of Oxford he left, or, as matter of form, sold, 23 vo- " lumes, which are now made public property, and are in the " British Museum." These are in general mere transcripts. His succinct and impartial account of St. Johns House and St. John's College, &c. must be excepted, which was composed by himself, and with great liberality. His printed books he left to St, John's College Library : among which is a copy of Calamy's "Ac- count of the Ministers, Lecturers, Masters, and Fellows of Col- leges, and Schoolmasters, who were ejected or silenced after the Restoration 1660." In this there are numerous notices of Mr. Ba- ker's, made with peculiar care. In his printed Books left to this College Library, — St. John's — and in all his MSS., he always styles himself, " iSocius ejectus," ejected Fellow 3 and he seems, if we may hazard an opinion, to have been fond of his title, priding himself, probably, rather on his being a man of conscience, than a man of learning. * In the large folio edition of Hooker's Ecclesiastical Polity, of 1723. J 70 or favourably inclined the other way," that is, the Puri- tanic. What induced many of them afterwards to go back, has nothing to do with our present business : what the rest, who persevered in their principles, thought, is very clear : and when Milton asserted — and he was at the time, both with respect to the doc- trine of the Trinity and other doctrines, what was called orthodox — that "he would not subscribe, be- cause he would not subscribe, slave,"" he expressed the deliberate opinion of many learned men of his age. With respect to Bacon, we could scarcely affirm any thing, which could be more true, and clearly ma- nifest, than that he was the flatterer of James, and too great a favourer of the doctrine of Expedience, to speak freely and openly : so that if we can collect any thing from him on this subject, it must be rather from the general profundity of his principles, than from any clear declaration in his writings ; though at the same time, it must be admitted, that many defects in our Universities were acknowledged by Bacon himself, to whose authority we shall presently appeal. What direct testimony Newton has given on this question, it is not necessary to investigate. It is as clear as light, what must of necessity have been thought of the creeds themselves, — and, consequently, what of the o9 Articles, — by him, who professed himself an Unitarian, in the Socinian sense, as he did, — which we beg leave to say under leave of Bishop Horsley* * " The insinuation contained in this expression ; — that theTri- " nity is not to be derived from the words prescribed for the b.ap- " tismal form, — is very extraordinary to come from a writer who was " no bocinian." Bishop llorsley's note on a passage in Sir Isaac Newton's Ilistoraal Account of two notable Corruptions of Scrip. Iure,viz,: \Joli.v.7. I Tunotliij'ni. ]G. In Bishop llorsley's Edition of Sir Isaac Neiv ton's U'orks. Now it is certain, that Newton was no Trinitarian according to 171 — and it is no less clear, what Dr. Clarke and his Arians thought on this subject : how far Whiston, while yet a youth, was from approving Subscription appears from *' the Memoirs of his Life and Writings, written by himself," A.D. 1749; and what he after- wards thought, his own writings abundantly testify. What were the opinions of Bishop Hare, of Dr. Jor- tin, of Dr. Sykes, and Dr. Middleton, with other learned men about that period, of kindred genius, it is easy to conjecture, nor would it be difficult to prove. Locke — though indeed of Oxford — who penetrated the most secret recesses of the human understanding, manfully opposed himself — and, indeed, how could he do otherwise ? — to all those fetters, with which inqui- sitorial men, with more cunning, than wisdom, have been accustomed to torment and confine it. What he thought of such torturings of the human under- standing sufficiently appears from his "Letters on Toleration." From his school proceeded many Cam- what is called the Athanasian doctrine ; nor would even Bishop Horsley have asserted, that he was : and it is equally certain, that he was no Arian, according to what he himself said of Dr. Clarke and the Arians, as may be seen in Mr. Hopkin Haines's " Preface to a Tract on the Existence and Attributes of God." Taking what Sir Isaac Newton there says in connexion with his famous Scho- lium Generale at the end of his "Principia," it should seem to be declaratory of the faith of a simple Unitarian — in the Socinian sense of the word, — though Newton might not choose to be called after the name of any head of a sect. But if he was no Athanasian, no Arian, no Socinian, what was he ? Suppose him a Nestorian, or Sabellian, it would be coming to nearly the same thing. It would be impossible for him to have approved the co-equality of three divine persons, the doctrine, according to Athanasius, contained in the first article, or the other articles connected with that. Still less, if his apprehension of Deity was, even as a philosopher, — as probably it was,— more a matter of feeling, than of speculation. 172 bridge-men, — Hartley, Law, Paley*, Jebb, and Tyr- vvliitt, tbe last of whom, as we have already shown, was desirous of proposing, and of having confirmed bv the Senate, a Grace for having Snbscription en- tirely abolished, at the time of taking Degrees. Nor should that company of ingenuous undergra- duates be passed bv, who about the same time sur- rounded the Academical Senate, supplicating, that they should not be too hastily hurried to subscription, till they had seriously considered the subjects, in which they were required to express their belief ; not because they rejected the Articles of Faith, through infidelity, but because they had not possessed leisure, nor learn- ing, nor experience, sufficient to examine the argu- ment in its full weight and force. Nor have those several venerable meetings of Clergy and Laity escaped usf, who, at dift'erent times have petitioned the British Parliament for relief from these oppressive burdens, nor the British House of Com- mons itself, in which were many, formerly University- men, who strenuously supported the same cause: — and what learned and clerical men wished to obtain for themselves, they surely would not have refused to young men, and laics, and plain citizens — Of this number, was Edm. Law, D.D. Master of Peter-House, with most of the Fellows, and the Chancellor himself, at * See Appendix II. t " Free and Candid Disquisitions relating to the Church of Enc;land, and the Means of advancini; Ilelij^ion therein ; address- ed to tl>e (jovcrning Powers in Churcli and State, and more imme- diately directed to the two Houses of Convocation." '2d edit. 1/50. — Subsequently to that work, viz. in 1/72 and 17/3, there have been two Assemblies, consisting of clergy and laity, who met to petition on the same subject, one at the Feathers' Tavern, Fleet- street, the other at Archbishop Tennison's Library, in Westminster. These Disquisitions and Assemblies have been already alluded to. 173 the time, who had been formerly of this College ; Robert Plumptre, D.D. President of Queen's College; Peter Peckard, D.D. Master of Magdalen College ; William Elliston, D.D. Master of Sidney College; with many others, among whom must be reckon- ed some, who afterwards became bishops, — Law, Watson, Porteus, and York. Nor have the names of many other learned men escaped us, some of more modern date and within our own memory : such as Mr. Archdeacon Blackburn, A.M. Catharine Hall ; David Hughes, S.T.B. Fell, of Queen's Col. ; Samuel Blackall, S.T.B. Fell, of Emmanuel Col. ; Mr. Baron Maseres, A.M. Fell, of Clare Hall ; Mr. Serjeant Heywood, A.M. Trin. Col.; Owen Manning, S.T.B. Peter-House; Theo- philus Lindsey, A.M. St. John's Col. ; Edward Evan- son, A.M. Emmanuel Col ; Sanmel Parr, LL.D. Emman. Col. ; John Baynes, A.M. Trin. Col. ; James Lambert, A.M. Fell, of Trin. Col. ; Thomas Fishe Palmer, S.T.B. Fell, of Queen's Col. ; John Disney, S.T.P. Peter-House ; Robert Barker, S.T.B. Queen's Col. ; William Frend, A.M. Fell, and Tutor of Jesus Col. ; Matthew Raine, S.T.P. Trinity Col. ; Thomas Jones, A.M. Fell, and Tutor of Trinity Col. ; Richard Porson, A M. Trin. Col. ; Thomas Clark- son, A.M. St. John's Col.; John Hammond, A.M. Fell, of Queen's Col. ; Robert Edward Gurnham, A.M. Fell, of Trin. Col.; David Simpson, A.M. St. John's Col. ; M. J. Naylor, S.T.B. Queen's Col. ; Thomas Northmore, A.M. Emmanuel Col.; William Burdon, A.M. Fell, of Emmanuel Col. ; John Twed- dle, A.M. Fell, of Trinity Col. ; James Losh, A.M. Trin. Col. ; Christopher Wyvill, LL.B. Queen's Col. ; Francis Blackburne, LL B. Peter-House ; Richard Elliot, A.B. CaiusCol.; Gilbert Wakefield, A.B. Fell. 174 of Jesus Col. ; Mr. Capel Lotft, Barrister, Peter- House; Mr. Thomas Manning, Caius Col. ; Mr. Philip Mal- let, Trinity Col. ; Mr, Samuel Peck, Trinity Col. ; Mr. Hen. Parnell, Trinity Col.*. A long list might be made out of gentlemen, who never graduated, because they did not at the time choose to subscribe, and of those who have subscribed, at the time of gra- duating, and afterwards disapproved of their subscrip- tion, it would be easy to furnisb a far more extended list — even a host. Nor can we doubt, judging from the spirit which was formerly manifested, and from the libe- rality of the present times, that there are still many re- sident members in both universities, who are secretly friends to the cause we are advocating, and who, on any proper occasion, would give it their best support. To these might be added the names of some, who, as we have heard, seceding from the established com- munity, have chosen to themselves their proper places • This list is composed of the names partly of gentlemen, who either by their writings, or some other public testimony, have ex- pressed their disapprobation of the practice here complained of; and partly of gentlemen, known to the writer at different periods of life, and with whose sentiments on the subject he wa.s well ac- quainted. It may, however, be thought, perhaps, by some, no good policy to produce the names of gentlemen as witnesses against Subscrip- tion, who. as graduates, must have subscribed themselves. And this would be rightly thought, if the question concerning this matter was like ordinary questions : but, 1st. The business of Subscription is often a mere hocus-pocus matter, as we have occasion to show elsewhere. Gentlemen are frequently taken by surprise, particularly those about to graduate in law and physic, often not knowing, nor wishing to know, what they subscribe. 2dly. There is a previous question, which gentlemen may feel, without putting it into words " have we not a right to a Degree without these extraneous subscriptions ?" Tliose who thus feel, — and it i► MAY 01 200) Form L9-Serie8 4939 PLEASf- ^° LA 636.5 D988A NOT REMO""^ •' LIBRARY FACILITY \ I nun thJs bookJ^ard* ca\ '^t'i'OJllV>»'^ , . „,.,,v Reseorch Library i^ IZ3 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFOBNI A-L09 ANQELES L 007 977 243