395c Burton C(»imunism iia THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COMMUNISM. FROM THE EIQHTH EDITION ENCYCLO]?iEDIA BPtlTANNICA. JOHN HILL BURTON, EDlNBUKaH : PRINTED BY NKILL & COMPANY. MDCCCLIV. HX =>c COMMUNISM. CoJoruKTSM is one of the terms which have been applied to the various classes of projects for re-organizing society, and subjecting men to a more or less strict system of regulations calculated, as their framers maintain, to promote human wel- fare. It is impossible to give a scientific definition of the word Communism, anymore than of Socialism or other miscellane- ous terms, in which groups of varying theories and projects are colloquially referred to. The influence which these pro- jects have fi'om time to time exercised upon mankind, and their late tragic connection with European history, render it necessary that some notice of them should be found in a work of general reference. It will be seen presently that it is convenient to bring them all under one head ; and the word Communism presents itself as preferable to any other, because it applies generally to the highest developments which artificial systems have aimed at. It thus includes the minor within the greater projects, and admits of the general re\iew of the whole question between artificial systems and the natural laws of society. Under the head of Communism it is usual to class those organizations which propose to adjust the whole conduct of the human being, and not only to regulate property, industry', and the sources of livelihood, but also to revolutionize the domestic relations and the social morals of mankind. The less unpopular term 891255 4 COJOIUNISM. of Socialism is generally applied to a revolution in the laws of property and the organization of labour. But no such distinction is fully established, and all the views and pro- jects of the re-organizers run more or less into each other. Investigation lays open an indefinite series of schemes, from the vast projects for taking possession of the new-born infant, and siibjecliMg him to a strict daily and hourly discipline tlu'ough life, down through an indefinite gradation of organiz- ing schemes, until we reach projects of pauper management or of joint-stock partnership, which may be merely spoken of as carrying in their nature a tinge of socialism. To give under the head of each separate artificial system — as, for instance, under Phalanstery, St-Simonianism, Fourier- ism, or Owenism — a specific account of the minutiae of each system thus propounded, after the manner in which an ac- count is given of the several sciences and philosophical systems, is the course which would naturally give most satis- faction to the supporters of each scheme ; for, as there has been little good understanding among the several projectors, and each has generally attacked the others, an inquiry in which their systems are mixed up with each other would be received as a confusion of truth with falsehood, and of saga- city with quackery. But if it were desirable to describe each system to the satisfaction of its supporters, it would be scarcely practicable. Fourier's alone might occupy years of study; and he himself maintained to the last that none, even of his most ardent disciples, rightly understood his system in all its complexity ; there was always something or other overlooked in its intricate machinery, which, like the absence of some essential wheel in a complex piece of clock-work, disorganized the whole. Even, however, if each system could be satisfactorily pur- sued through all its ramifications and laid distinctly before the reader, it does not appear that the result would justify the labour and space necessary for the object. A question an- tecedent to any question as to the merits of the details of communism:. 6 each system is, whether a case is made out for artificial in- tervention at all — whether nature has not established laws which accomplish the object in view better than any pro- jects which human ingenuity can devise. It is to the social laws developed by the domestic rela- tions, and to those wider and less rigid principles of action which are indicated by the science of political economy, that we go to find the system on which it has pleased the Deity to provide that mankind should live. It is true that, in investigating the true principles which rule the domestic relations, inquirers may, as in scientific investigations of any kind, make mistakes ; and they are perhaps still more liable to err when they investigate the laws of pohtical economy, and endeavour to distinguish what they are sufficient from what they are insufficient to accomplish. But both systems proceed upon the belief that there are laws of social and economic development, as there are laws of mineral crystal- lization, or of animal and vegetable physiology ; and to find out these laws is the constant endeavour of all social and political economists. The propounders of communistic or socialistic projects, on the other hand, deny the existence of the whole or of a great part of such a system — maintain that man is living in chaos, and offer to regulate him and put him into shape as so much inorganic matter. As a simple example, social economy says that in the general case parents ought to have the adjustment of their childrens' destiny left in their hands, because a law of nature makes them love their offspring and desire its welfare ; and though there may be exceptional cases, yet the law of family affection is so general that a re- liance on it affords a better chance of accomplishing the desired object than any artificial arrangement. On the other hand, a communist will maintain that children ought to be immediately removed from their parents and brought up by a committee of management, because, to use the words of Robert Owen, " the affections of parents for their b COBrJTCNISM. own childien are too stronj^ lor their judgments ever to do justice to themselves, their children, or the public, in the education of their own children, even if private i'amilies possessed the machinery — which they never do — to well manufacture character from birth." To take another simple examj)le from political economy. This science teaches us that the best means of supplying mankind with the material objects of their desire is to leave the function to the spirit of commercial competition, and to secure an absolute property in the fruits of industry to those who bring them into existence. On the other hand, Louis IJIanc says that commercial competition is a source of misery and degradation, while Prudhon says property is robbery, and each desires to adjust the whole matter according to an organization of his own. Those therefore who believe in the truth of political eco- nomy cannot admit that there is any need for the projects of the socialists and communists, and consequently cannot admit that there is any necessity for studying and developing the ramifications of each system, and showing precisely where they differ and agree, or wherein one is preferable to the other. Hence it is that, [proceeding upon the basis that the princi- ples of political economy express with more or less accuracy certain natural laws which it is unnecessary to supersede, it is not considered necessary to investigate the ultimate arrangements of each projector's system ; and so it has been deemed expedient to treat here merely of the primary ques- tion between the natural system and the artificial systems. For the whole matter receiving attention to this extent in a work like the present, there are various reasons. In the first place, late European events have made the projects of the socialists and communists a part of the history of the world. But further still, at the point where the plans of the iirtificial projectors depart from the received doctrines of political economy,' they are an important means of testing the accuracy of these doctrines by the application of a sort COMMI NISM. of experimentum crucis. Hence the readers of socialist works often say that the system, as a system, is unsound, yet there is some truth in its foundation ; while what they really mean is, that there is some mistake or defect In the received doctrines of political economy for which the in- ventor is offering an artificial remedy. Wherever opinions in favour of these artificial systems prevail — and in later times they have occasionally prevailed to a sufficiently alarm- ing extent — there must be something wrong in the condi- tion of the people. There is some error in the political economy which rules their actions, and either they are im- properly interfered with, or they are so neglected that the true laws of nature have not freedom to develop themselves. One organic defect developed in nearly all the instances where such projects become popular, is an extent of popular ignorance, rendering the laws of political economy nugatory among a people who cannot understand even their simplest rudiments. From such causes, the social and communistic movements with which the world has been occasionally visited are, taken collectively, an interesting and valuable object of inquiry. The literature of this department of inquiry is indefinite, since it blends itself with theology, ethics, politics, poUtical economy, and history. Every, one who proposes anything for the improvement of mankind is liable to come within the category, if, instead of aiding nature, his project should pro- jx)se to supersede her laws. Hence communistic literature covers all the range from such vast plans of reconstruction as Fourier's or St Simon's, down to the pamphlet on Pauper Management, which may become liable to the suspicion of communism. The great conceptions or plans of govern- ment which have from time to time appeared, generally mix up an artificial organization with that which is in actual operation ; and sometimes the former character so entirely preponderates, and carries the whole project so far out of the course of actual practice and probability, that it is set 8 COMMUNISM. down as a fiincii'ul dream, of which the author never antici- pated the realization. Such is the Uto])ia of Sir Thomas More, vvhieli lias alforded a term for characterizing impos- sible or i)reposterous schemes. Some of the Frencli writers are proud of saying, that the great dispute between social- ism and political economy — between the world as it should he made, and the Morld as it is — began when Plato wrote his licimblic, and Aristotle in his Politics bent his power- ful practical mind to the examination of the actual con- »htion and political organization of mankind. The Re- public of Cicero, from which the world expected important views on govermnent, supplied from the practice of Rome, embodied the Platonic vagueness ; and the same spirit has pervaded the works of a multitude of writers on political philosophy. It has to be observed, that before it can give expression to a distinct theory of communism, the press nnist be free, or in a state of defiance, because in proposing a new plan of organization, it proposes to supersede the government of the day. Hence it was in the midst of the great contest in England in the seventeenth century, that the boldest practical opinions were expressed in such works as the Leviathan of Hobbes and the Oceana of Harrington. When works like Rousseau's Social Contract were popular, it may be said that the French press was in a state of licensed rebellion, since under despotic rule, opinions of the most an- archical and revolutionary character were promulgated with such systematic calmness, as if the possibility of their being adopted and carried into practice were not to be enter- tained. In France, since the first revolution, while the press has sometimes been controlled, yet opportunities have been afforded from time to time for issuing such works as have to be presently noticed. In 1848, not only in France, but throughout Germany, a current of socialistic literature broke out. It has now been forced back again, and there is no freedom on the Continent to publish communistic doctrines. In Britain the whole question has been left COMMUNISM. 9 freely to develop itself, with what effect we shall presently see. Communistic arrangements have been from time to time in partial practical operation among isolated bodies of men, and the character of this partiality of operation is peculiarly instructive. The most illustrious example is that of the Spartan discipline. From his cradle to his grave, the La- cedaemonian citizen was regulated in all his movements by the state. He had no home or family. When the state permitted him to marry, it adjusted his conjugal intercourse, and might temporarily or permanently transfer his rights to another person. Everything was adjusted to the produc- tion and training of healthy and strong men fit for the war- like service of the state. The men living in separate bar- racks were, if possible, not to be acquainted with their child- ren by sight, lest, according to the view resuscitated by Mr Owen, paternal weakness might interfere with the rigid cha- racter of public discipline. At the sysitia or public mess, there was a meal renowned for its frugality distributed with impartial uniformity to rich and poor. Competition in trade was rendered impossible, since no commercial or productive pursuits could be followed by free citizens ; and, in reality, there was no money or circulating medium, the celebrated iron coin being rather a practical sarcasm on the gold and silver of other states, than a substitute for them. With all their elaborate and stern enforcement of equality. Spartan citizens had however in some way the command of wealth, and they were divided like the rest of mankind into the rich and the poor. But their great inequality which carried off all the social difficulties of their complicated organization was their vast system of slavery. As not only servile drudgery, but productive commerce, and, it might be said, all the arts of peace, were committed to the helot class, their numbers and capacity made them powerful, and only a ceaseless watchful- ness and severity interspersed with some acts of ferocious cruelty kept them from reversing the social order. In fact, 10 COMMUNISM. this instance goes with otliers of minor moment, to show that to the extent to which there is artificial organization, there must be a corresponding amount of slavery or coer- cion, since men must be forced to do that which it is not lawful to bribe them by competitive pecuniary recompense to do. The philosophy of the Spartan example was in the mind of a Scottish workman, who, when a brilliant commu- nist lecturer had iinisheil his description of the uniformity and happiness of his parallelogram, stood up and said, " but whae's to dee the durty wark." The lecturer ingeniously pointed to the mmiber of primarily disagreeable occupa- tions which men may be induced to undertake without pay- ment — as when the anatomist handles macerating garbage, and the sportsman pursues the chase of the unprofitable wild beast through cold and heat, wet and hunger. But whatever speculators may anticipate as to the future of human nature, it is a fact as to the past and present visible every day, that there are services, and these important to human happiness, that nothing but coercion or pecuniary inducement will extract. Among the practical instances of artificial organization in later times, we may cite the guilds and other associations of traders and artificers whose peculiar privileges have scarcely yet entirely disappeared, while they are in some measut-e virtually revived by trade-unions and combinations. Their object was to suppress competition and freedom of action ; but it was so far different from such views as those of Owen and Louis Blanc, that, instead of providing some substitute for competition of which all were to reap the advantage, the object was to confine all the benefits of trade or productive industry to a chosen few, exclusive of the rest of the world. Thus, so long as they were sufficiently powerful to retain their privileges and suppress external competition, they pos- sessed a compactness which enabled them to enforce their internal restrictions and obligations as the price paid for the possession of lucrative privileges. In other words, as it was COJDIUNISJr. 11 more profitable for a man to belong to a corporation, though it restricted him from competing with its other members, than it would be for him to compete with the world at large, he assented to restrictions ; and submission to them in these instances does not show that the world at large will ever consent to accept and obey them. The power of religion has in many instances acted as that force which will keep men in associative action on principles contrary to the natural laws of society. It is not difficult to imagine the early Christians in small clusters, with the firmest reliance in each other and in the continual fear of persecution, enjoying all things in common. The monastic -■) establishments were communistic institutions, and they in- fused a tinge of their character into the early universities. Relics of its tone may still be found even lingering in such uncongenial ground as Cambridge and Oxford. The mo- nastic communities, however, attempted by their organization to supply only a portion of that which nature does by social laws. They cut off entirely those relations of husband and wife, and of parent and child, which, as they are in them- selves the most complex and powerful portion of the natural organization, are of course the least easily accomplished by the artificial. There are some small communities at pre- sent in America, such as the Shakers, who, exacting the same observance of celibacy, manage, through a system of communism, to supply within the limited sphere of opera- tion left to it the natural laws of society. Their orderly habits, and the success with which their agricultural opera- tions have been pursued, have often been cited in support of communistic principles. It was chiefly by religious in- fluence that the Jesuits established their empire in Para- guay, where their authority was not merely that of a govern- ment, but extended over the social direction and organiza- tion of the peculiar people among whom they established their mission. The classes of religious societies scattered through central Europe, and known as Moravians, Bohc- 12 COMJIUNISM. niian Brethren, or Ilerrnhuters, in a similar manner derive tlie power ol' soeial orroductive part of the arniy service — the supply of food. 30 COMMUNISM. apparel, barracks, and weapons — is tlie object of ordinary competition. His ultimate project was to substitute a perfect system of state organization ibr the imperfect and pernicious sys- tem of cnii)loyment and competition. At the time when liis work was published, however, the state was a monarchy, of'^hose abuses he had himself made many a bitter exposure. Having therefore considered that state management had, in the exjierience of the world, always tended to abuse and in- equality, he admitted that his system could not be committed to any state such as had existed among mankind. The first step must be the establishment of a perfectly pure demo- cracy, which would have the interests of all impartially at heart. This once done, the organization of labour might be carried out. To make the change adjust itself to exist- ing interests, he proposed to make the competitive efforts of the state, in the first j)lace, absorb all other competition. The state was to begin by raising a loan to establish a limited number of workshops in each department of industry. In these establishments government should regulate the func- tions and gradations of the men ; but after a time, when they became acquainted with each other, and with the princii)le of co-operation, they would adjust their own social hierarchy on the elective system. From the commencement the men would be allowed wages or subsistence money. The profits being struck at the end of the year, would be divided into four parts. One would be a sinking fund for the repayment of the capital, — though it is difficult to see how, when the system fully developed itself, there should be any person in a position to receive payment of capital ; another fo\irth would be divided among the men ; the third would go to found an hospital tor the sick and infirm ; and the last would be retained as a reserve for special purposes. By the perfection of their management, their extensive capital, and their general popularity, these national work- shops would gradually drive private establishments out COMMUNISM. 31 of the field, and, enlarging themselves, fill the place occu- pied by them. But, as this competition would be worked by a perfectly benevolent, pure, and conscientious govern- ment, it would be deformed by none of the exterminat- ing defects of the ordinary competitive system, and one of its principles should be, that its pressure be as gentle as may be consistent with its effectiveness. In a short time all private competition would be vanquished, and the or- ganization of every department of labour would be vested in the state, to be regulated with that perfect wisdom and justice of which the state, as formed by Louis Blanc, would be certainly possessed. It is the policy of Louis Blanc to find fault with nothing in the existing social and moral condition of things beyond that portion of them which must be superseded to admit of his own favourite plan for the organization of labour. Hence, in his endeavours to engraft his novel projects on the ordinary institutions of society, and to prove their supe- riority over M-hat they displace by arguments founded on mere ordinary utility and profit, he renders his fallacies much more palpable than those of his contemporary Prudhon, who, proposing to demolish every existing institution and belief, sets arguments of a merely utilitarian character at defiance, and challenges a contest on a wider and more fundamental ground. But of the two, the paradoxes stated with so much deference to received opinions, and with so much amiable be- nevolence proved far more calamitous than the vast revolu- tions of Prudhon, which, suggested by a relentless hatred of all that men have been accustomed to love and revere, have carried with them their own practical confutation to the greater portion of those who have read them. Without examining more minutely Prudhon's system, it is appro- priate to the point immediately under consideration to show that his practical conclusions are directly the reverse of those of Louis Blanc, whom, after the usual method of or- ganic social reformers wlien speaking of each other's plans, S2 COMMUNISM. he lashes with c'ondiijn ridicule. (lathering up all the phy- sical and moral ucaltli oi" which the rights of property and other human institutions have robbed mankind, Prudhon seems to advocate a distribution according to each human be- ing's contributions as a productive worker to the riches of the world. With his usual felicity of illustration, he compares the man who obtains, by property, office, or in any other shape, more than the proportion corresponding with his exer- tions, to areaper who receives aloaf for cutting an ear of corn. On the other hand, Louis Blanc's princi[)le of distribu- tion is, that men should receive not according to their ca- pacities or exertions, but their needs; and the whole object of his organization of labour, both in its theoretic form, and when afterwards, as one of the provisional government of 1848, he endeavoured to put it in practice, was to carry out this result. In his national workshops, all competi- tion, all rivalry, all selHshuess, were to be dead. Each man on a principle of honour was to perform his assigned duty — the distribution of the proceeds was to be a separate ope- ration, proceeding on grounds totally distinct from the com- parative services of the producers. A suspicion is suggested by the tone of some parts of the Organisation du Travail — which will be confirmed by a per- usal of its author's clever History of Ten Years of the reign of Louis Philippe — that his strong hatred of competition rests on opinions, or more properly speaking impulses, totally different from those economical arguments on which he pro- fesses to found them. In treating of the working classes, he always speaks of them as mere mute instruments who must take, collectively, the position which the capitalists, or — when they are superseded — the predominant party in the state, assign to them ; and he never makes allowance for energy or activity promoting an improvement in their con- dition. In his History he complains of their becoming selfish and sordid, and accumulating money in the savings-banks during the early prosperous years of Louis Philippe's reign. COMMUNISM. 33 These indications of a feeling that the working classes are a mere inanimate mass at the command of organizers, are accompanied by unmistakeable references to the time of conquest, aggression, and tyranny, as that of the true glory of France, and bitter allusions to the sordid spirit of peace- ful productive industry, which has been the source of British greatness. He refers repeatedly to the admitted prosperity and influence which Britain has achieved by the spirit of commercial competition, pointing out what France must ac- complish to excel us in such a race, and pointing it out in a tone of deprecatory despondency. It is clear that the pre- dominating influence which has produced his mischievous books is, that in a struggle with Britain for national supe- riority, the chance for his own country is not in directing her people to industrial productiveness, but in abandoning competition and peaceful wealth, and assuming an organi- zation which, as in the days of Napoleon's greatest achieve- ments, will place all France in array against any nation competing with her for the supremacy of the world. That, in short, the best chance for France being great and for- midable is not by producing wealth, but by destroying the wealth created by others. The opinions of the Organisation du Travail spread rapidly among the Parisian workmen, and those of the larger provincial towns. Many other works promulgating views of the same kind were eagerly devoured, and even the more abstruse and forbidding treatises of previous or- ganizers were received into favour, as being so far on the side of the abolitionists, that they were against property and other existing institutions. Thus a large body of men ra- diated from central Paris through all the populous portions of France, whose opinions on government were not merely republican as against monarchy, but were communistic or socialistic as against pnjperty and other social institutions. It belongs rather to the history of France than to the immediate object of this paper to describe the influence of c 34 coMMUNis:\r. these far-spread opinions on the eventful history of tlie year 1848. Among those who had obtained a popular position in the connuon arena oi' ])olitic's, the provisional government of France included Louis IJIanc, and others for whom power was demanded, rather on account of their anti-economic than their anti-regal opinions. Between the merely politi- cal republicans on the one hand, and the comnnmists and socialists on the other, there was a long conflict which it required a stronger party than either to put down. The miseries of the period of conflict, and the subsequent sub- jugation of France, were the legitimate fruit of the doc- trines which Louis Blanc, Prudhon, and other writers had been promulgating. Strongly represented as they were in the j)rovisional government, they could not obtain a direct practical adoption of their principles as the universal law of France. They obtained, however, general resolutions from the provisional government, importing that an end must be put to the sufferings of the labouring classes, and that they ought to be guaranteed the legitimate fruits of their labour. The committee of the Luxembourg was at the same time appointed, with Louis Blanc at its head, to consider the con- dition of the workmen. The object of the majority of the provisional government was in this shape to get rid of the whole question by making it a mere matter of inquiry. The object of M.Blanc and his friends was to make the committee a means of action rather than of mere investigation. They suc- ceeded, at least, so far as to induce a vast body of workmen to look to them for a regeneration of their lot, and abandon all projects of honest industry. A portion of these were em- ployed, neither to their own satisfaction nor to the benefit of the community, in national workshops where all were paid alike. The idle, who constituted the majority, admired the system. In the hotel Clichy a special experiment was tried on a government order for the uniforms of the Garde Mobile. Fifteen hundred tailors were assembled, with an establish- ment of foremen, clerks, and cutters. The sum at which an COMMUNISM. . So army contractor would during the monarchy have furnished the dresses having been set down as their proper price, the men were allowed two francs a-day as subsistence money while they worked, and were in the end to obtain the bal- ance equally divided among them. But when the day of reckoning came, it was found that not only was there no balance of gain, but that there was loss, and that the two francs a-day of subsistence money — the lowest rate of wages paid by master tailors — had overpaid the men for the work actually done by them under the mere impulse of " liberty, equality, and fraternity." Their energies, unexcited by the spirit of competition, relaxed when each man found that the proceeds of his increased exertions were not to be received by himself alone, but to be distributed over the whole body of 1500 fellow-workmen. It is the peculiarity of all great systems of social organi- zation, that when they are put in practice and fail, the failure is attributed to the imperfect character of the experiment. Louis Blanc and his friends have ever maintained that the reason why the efforts to put his projects in force in 1848 failed, was because they were imperfectly and not com- pletely tried. The circumstances under which he fled from France, and his contributions to the socialist press of Eng- land, indicate that he purposed to carry out his system by force, when it was seen that the majority of the suffrages of the people were against it. A true fanatic to his views, he held that the |X)pular mind had been impregnated with false principles by the corrupt system of employment and competition ; and that, to afford a fair field for the true sys- tem, it was necessary in the first place to use the power possessed by the wielders of supreme authority in France to carry it out by force. He readily — like all protesters against tyranny who are going to commit a flagrant act of coercion — found an excuse for his conduct in the necessity soundly to indoctrinate the people, and enable them to ap- preciate the truth. 36 coxmuNisM. Tlio manlier in uhicli the eoniniunist and socialist doc- trines spread tlironu;h Evu'ope, and were suppressed in France as well as elsewhere, forms one of the most memo- rable chapters in late European history. It has only to be noticed that, while the public organs of these opinions have been suddenly silenced on the Continent, no one can at this moment say how far the opinions themselves may be under- mining the governments which a})pear to keep them down, and the whole order of society. In our own country we know with fortunate distinctness liow the matter stands, and, as the following explanation will show, we have to thank the freedom of the press for a feeling of security of which other nations are lamentably deficient. Socialistic and communistic notions, though they have sometimes been very prevalent in Britain, have never en- listed any great amount of intellect, either in devising or promulgating them. The few stray writers who have gone beyond a sentimental and hesitating sympathy with the views of the continental communists have belonged to a to- tally different class in the intellectual hierarchy from those men who have by their genius and fervid eloquence from time to time convulsed the j)ublic mind of France. The name of Robert Owen stands supreme as the prophet and champion of British communism. But, though his position is thus lofty with relation to his peculiar department, he is a man of very moderate literary abilities. A continued perseverance in one tone, an undying sanguineness which made him speak with the assurance of success at the time when the pros- pects of his cause were at the extremity of hopelessness, and an entire reliance on his own infallibility, have been the qualities which, more than once in the course of his long life, have procured him an attentive hearing from a considerable portion of the public. The conditions under which he first appealed to public sympathy were favourable to his demands, since he advocated the cause of a portion of society to which the social institu- COilJIL'XISM. 37 tionsof the age failed to communicate their organizing in- riuence. The inventions of Hargreaves and Arkwright had just given their impulse to the manufacturing system. By the creation of cotton mills in districts which had been but thinly peopled, a [X)rtion of the people were dragged cut of the bosom of ordinary society and all the organizing prin- ciples which had arisen with its slow growth, and were chaotically massed together in large groups, without the ap- plication of any sanction to replace those influences which they had left behind them, in the shafje of ecclesiastical mem- bership, corporate or parochial supervisance, the genial con- trol of hereditary neighbours, and the family ties- In Scot- land the social revolution was signally conspicuous and disas- trous. The cheapness of labour in that part of the empire, and the geological facilities for obtaining water po«er, at- tracted English manufacturing capital northwards, and often in some solitary glen several hundreds of persons were at once set down as mere producing machines, without any consideration for their moral condition or any effort to sup- ply for them those elements of social organization which, naturally of slow growth, cannot be voted and adopted at once by a working population even had they knowledge enough to be aware of their necessity. Owen was himself practically engaged in manufactures, and the first revelations of his system came to the English public with all that authority which disinterested benevo- lence, supported by practical sagacity, is sure to command. So in the year 18 lo, in a tract called " Observations on the Effect of the Manufacturing System, with Hints for the Improvement of those |mrts of it which are most injurious to Health and Morals," we may read the following excellent remarks : — " In the manufacturing districts it is common for parent;- to send their children of both sexes, at seven or eight years of age, in winter as well as summer, at six o'clock in the morning, sometimes of course in the dark, and occasionally 38 COMMUNISM. amidst frost and snow, to enter the manufactories, whicli are often heated to a liigli temperature, and contain an atmo- sphere far i'rom being the most favourable to lumian hfe, and in which all those employed in them very frequently con- tinue until twelve o'clock at noon, when an hour is allowed for dinner, afler which they rctm-n to remain, in a majority of cases, till eight o'clock at night. " The children now find they must labour incessantly for their bare subsistence ; they have not been used to innocent, healthy, and rational anmsements ; they are not permitted the requisite time if they had been previously accustomed to enjoy them. They know not what relaxation means, except by the actual cessation from labour. They are sur- rounded by others similarly circumstanced with them- selves ; and thus passing on from childhood to youth, they become gradually initiated, the young men in particular, but often the yoimg females also, in the seductive pleasures of the ])ot-house and inebriation, for which their daily hard labour, want of better habits, and the general vacuity of their minds tend to prepare them. " Such a system of training cannot be expected to pro- duce any other than a population weak in bodily and men- tal faculties, and with habits generally destructive of their own comforts and the well-being of those around them, and strongly calculated to subdue all the social affections. Man so circumstanced sees all around him hurrying forward at a mail-coach speed to acquire individual wealth, regardless of him, his comforts, his wants, or even his sufferings, except by way of a degrading parish charity, fitted only to steel the heart of man against his fellows, or to form the tyrant and the slave. To-day he labours for one master, to-morrow for a second, then for a third, and a fourth, until all ties between employers and employed are frittered down to the consider- ation of what immediate gain each can derive from the other. The employer regards the employed as mere instruments of gain, while these acquire a gross ferocity of character. COMMTINISM. 39 which, if legislative measures shall not be judiciously devised to prevent its increase, and ameliorate the condition of this class, will sooner or later plunge the country into a formid- able and perhaps inextricable state of danger." This was new to the world in the year 1815, and the best testimony that it was not only new but true and valuable, is to be found in the too frequent repetition of the same causes of complaint down to the present day, uttered with a general similarity of tone which makes these sentences scarcely seem obsolete or antiquated after the lapse of forty years. But when a few such apt elucidations are culled fi'om Owen's earlier works, it is easily perceived that their merits are exhausted ; and through the tremendous voluminousness of his writings during the ensuing forty years, we may wade in vain, finding nothing at the utmost better than an ex- hausted repetition, after many years, of some judicious sen- timent to be found in his early pamphlets. That Owen was connected with a manufactory, the organization in which contrasted with such descriptions, was a very well known fact, which gave much emphasis to his writings. But it must be questioned whether any great portion of either the practical or theoretical wisdom of which he has obtained the merit was his own. The New Lanark cotton mill, with which Owen's name has long been associated, was founded in the year 1784 by Mr David Dale. Owen married his daughter, and thus succeeded to a patrimonial interest in the establishment. In the multifarious works in which he has proclaimed his own merits, he occasionally, but very rarely, mentions the organizing efforts of Mr Dale as a sort of introduction to his own. It is known, however, that Mr Dale was the author of at least a very large proportion of the practical arrangements in the New Lanark mill ; and when it is mentioned that he is not known to have ever solicited public attention to his exertions, while Mr Owen has been an incessant prater about himself, his services, and his projects, for half a century, it may be conjectured that 10 COJIMUNISM. liis practical footino: in a well-organized manuflictory was made for him. In fact, though he jirofesses to have found liis predecessor struggling by imperfect remedies with social (liflicultics which he himself afterwards overcame through means ol'his peculiar solvent, tliere is no doubt that all that was beneficently and judiciously effected at New Lanark was the doing of INIr Dale. Owen had at least sense enough to see the usefulness of his arrangements, and to improve on them. Whether by his own talent, or from the instructions of his father-in-law, he could generalize on the lesson taught by the defects of the ordinary manufactory system in the manner of the passage quoted above ; and thus, being a vain good Innnoured man, frivolous and fond of popularity, it fell to his lot to acquire a very high rei)utation, as a social ])hilosopher who had accomplished the imwonted feat of putting Lis the- ories into practice. The New Lanark mills were for some years deemed one of the wonders of the world, and no member of a royal house, or illustrious stranger travelling in Scotland, failed to visit them. Owen when he went to London de- livered addresses in Exeter Hall, at which members of the royal family thought they were doing a public duty by at- tending ; and it was at one time rumoured that the Duke of Kent intended to give the princess who is now the queen of the British empire the benefit of instructions, in social science, by Robert Owen. Among the many foreign tri- butes to his popularity, was the offer of a province in Texas where he might carry out his system much more freely than he could in the New Lanark mills, but he declined the banishment involved in such an arrangement. As time passed, however, the practical base on which Owen appeared to found his system was seen to slip from beneath him. His partners in the New Lanark mill found it necessary to buy him off. He was continually writing papers explaining how the human race had heretofore been left in ignorance, darkness, and misery, which he possessed, by the establishment of his " Rational System of Society," COM5IUNISM. 41 the means of immediately connecting. He indicated his opinion that the New Lanark works had reached successfully two points out of twenty which were necessary to perfecti- bility; and some of his partners who appeared to be well contented with the pecuniary results of the undertaking, afraid tliat Owen might defeat them by attempts to carry out a portion of the remaining eighteen points, resolved if possible to be rid of him. With the capital which he drew out of the concern — a considerable sum — Owen immediately projected an esta- blishment in more entire conformity with his now matured system. The place selected was Orbiston in Lanarkshire, where a great parallelogram was to be erected, that being the only form of edifice in which the perfect uniformity of organization which was to reign throughout the administra- tion would have its proper development. The edifice was commenced in 1825, and Owen's own funds were sufficient to build a portion of it Of the whole sum necessary, how- ever, which he fixed at L.96,000, so small a proportion was available that only one angle of the parallelogram was com- pleted. In this mutilated shape it was of course impossible that the social organization dependent on the parallelogram form could be developed. Nearly two hundred inmates oc- cupied it for some time, but they lived with so little of the promised harmony of The New Moral World, that the country people called the place Babel. It was treated as a great moral nuisance, and the society soon breaking up, the building was levelled with the ground, much to the satisfaction of the neighbourhood. By this time, indeed, Owen had turned the tide of popular feeling against him by views calculated to be extremely offensive. Among his observations on the habits of the manufacturing population, he had laid it down that in their moral consti- tution vice and superstition alternated. To a person coming, as he did, from England, into close contact with the most un- restrained section of the Scottish population, the rigidness of 1 2 COMMUNISM. the Calvinistic principles of the people would naturally appear in startling and mipleasing contrast with their deep vices. To tiuhoni the deptlis of such a social system, and adjust the proper remedies, re(iuired a stronoer judgment than Owen's, and a less presumptuous will. He inmiediately be- gan an unequal theological contest, in which he omitted no- thing that could rouse the jealousy and indignation of the clergy, or shock the j)rejudices of the people. He was not only to be the lawgiver, but the prophet of his system, esta- blishing in it a new rational religion of his own ; and though he did not require a communion of wives as well as a com- munion of goods, yet he made the marriage tie dissolvable with alarming facility. On the other hand, the supporters of free political insti- tutions were alarmed by the complex official hierarchy which was to rule with absolute power. It is true that there was in the eyes of its constructor a perfectly efficient check on tyranny, injustice, and rapacity, but it was not sufficient to convince the rest of the vvorld. It arose from the perfec- tion of nature which men would obtain under the rational system of society — their entire divestiture of all human pas- sions and prejudices. These expectations, along with as- surances that every Inmian being would possess under the new system an abundance of everything desirable to an inhabitant of the world, were conveyed in unceasing streams of such mellifluent prophecies as the following : — " In these separate societies there will be no contest or competition between the members ; nor yet will there be any between the societies, however near or distant or nu- merous they may be . . . all will be trained and edu- cated to acquire the greatest amount of useful and valuable knowledge ; and then possessing the spirit of charity, kind- ness, and love for all their fellows, which spirit will be given to them by their new mode of instruction from birth, — all will of necessity feel the greatest desire to aid and assist each other to the full extent of their powers, and their COMMUNISM. 43 greatest pleasure will arise from being thus occupied. There will also be in each of these societies the due proportion of manufactures, trades, and commerce, for the number of members and their wants ; but manufactures, trades, and commerce will be established and conducted on principles very different to those prevalent throughout present society. • . . In this manner will these societies, being always supplied with the latest and best machinery for performing whatever it can be made to well execute, produce the greatest amount of the most valuable wealth in the shortest time and in the best manner, so as to produce health and enjoyment to all while engaged in the department of pro- duction." ^ Owen appeared to have obtained another and a still more satisfactory opportunity of attesting his principles in the year 1 843. The communists and socialists, acting under the impulses to be presently mentioned, had collected a con- siderable sum of money, and resolved to centralize their societies under the authority of a congress, which was to meet in Harmony Hall, an edifice built by them in Hamp- shire, to serve both as a central office for socialist oi'ganiza- tion, and a model for other quadrangular establishments. Here, on the 10th of May, Mr Owen was solemnly chosen President of the Congress. From that time, in the official organs of his sect, we find him making progresses among the provincial establishments, like a sovereign inspecting the several local institutions of his realm ; and it would be re- corded that he visited the Concordium, and after having in- spected the premises, was presented with an address by the Pater and Elder, and was entertained by the whole family at dinner. But it soon turned out that a total difference of view lay between Owen and his supporters. He, ever looking to the broad measures of universal human regeneration over which he had been now for several years a theoretic dreamer, ^ The Book of the Neiu Moral World, explanatory of the Elements of the Science of Hociefj, by liobert Owen, I., t. xi., p. 19. 44 COMMUNISM. contemplated only the blessings wliieh the world was to reap from an entire social regeneration, while his disciples were bent on obtaining personal advantages from the imme- diate application of its principles. These they did not find at Harmony Hall, and they consequently deposed their chief. The history of the new race of communists and socialists, who had thus lost all respect for the j)atriarch of their sect, must be briefly given. While tlie policy of protection to native agriculture and other interests prevailed, and the Apprentice Act, with various corporate restrictions on labour, was in full observance, the ■\M)rknuin, far from being taught that he must depend on his own industry and prudence, was led to expect that the state would take care of him. It professed to protect the landed and farming interest, the shipping interest, and va- rious other separate interests. It did not entirely neglect the workman. By acts for restraining the introduction of foreign silk and cotton goods, and by various other legis- lative efforts, he was professedly protected. Still, while the landowner, the farmer, the shipowner, and the master-ma- nufacturer were rich, he was poor and miserable. He main- tained, therefore, that what the state had done for them it had not done for him, and he hailed the doctrines of the communists and socialists as affording him a more entire and effective protection. Hence those princi|)les had spread so widely from the passing of the Reform Bill downwards as to create much alarm. While some wisely considered that free discussion, and the remedy of admitted evils, would be the best cure for this social disease ; others proposed a re- sort to coercion. On the 20th of January 1840, the Bishop of Exeter asked in the House of Lords if the government had taken any steps to repress the progress of socialism, and was answered by Lord Normanby, the home secretary, that no such steps had been taken ; but that, if the persons re- ferred to w^ere guilty of any offence, the jjroper proceedings would he adopted. On the 24th the bishop resumed the dis- cussion, on the presentation of a petition bv 40.000 of the COMMUNISM. 45 clergy, magistrates, merchants, and traders of Birmingham, praying their Lordships to interpose for the suppression of sociaUsm. He stated that " Great Britain was divided into tburteen principal districts. A congress met annually, which assumed to itself legislative power for directing the whole proceedings of the general body. That congress assembled, he believed, at different points in different years. Two delegates were sent from all the places where there were charter branches of the society, not amounting to less than 61. There was besides an executive body, the Central Court. He did not know how often that met ; but he be- lieved it was in a constant state of capacity for meeting. That body superintended the formation of associations throughout the land, and appointed missionaries to each of the fourteen districts into which the United Kingdom was divided by the society. There were no fewer than 350 towns regularly visited by these m.issionaries." — Hansard's Debates. The vehement and intolerant terms in which the bishop demanded the suppression of the offensive doctrines created an immediate reaction in their favour. Whatever amount of adhesion they had obtained was speedily increased, and several able periodicals for some time represented the opi- nions of various clusters of communists and socialists. Free discussion, however, and the known failure of the partial ex- periments which had occurred, accompanied by the abolition of the protective system, soon undermined any position which such doctrines had obtained in the public mind. The revo- lution of 1848 was followed by an expiring flash. The com- munistic periodicals, after a brief period of excitement and success, dropped one by one out of existence. There is at the present moment no known public organ of these systems in Britain ; and while this has been the happy result of entire freedom of discussion, there can be little doubt tliat, in those nations where opinion has been coerced, a communistic spirit of the most dangerous kind still smoulders, ready, when an occasion offers itself, to burst forth in a consuming fla.ne. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. jnii L'J-40w-7,'o()(0790s4)444 UNIVEIiSnf OF CAUFORNIA iriS 'ANGELES liurton -- UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIB AA 000 778 1