;;yi'I^>I-:Ii;^fMr>>^lS:.T^^^%^^'.v...-.,.-,.^^.i;3^i'l:^^ii^;w The Press-Gang AFLOAT AND ASHORE n Sv-f' J. R.. HUTCHINSON THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE \ THE PRESS-GANG THE PRESS-GANG AFLOAT AND ASHORE BY J. R HUTCHINSON NEW YORK E. P. DUTTON & CO, 1914 CONTENTS CHAP. I. How THE Press-Gang came in II. Why the Gang was necessary III. What the Press-Gang was . IV. Whom the Gang might take V, What the Gang did Afloat VI. Evading the Gang VII. What the Gang did Ashore VIII. At Grips with the Gang IX. The Gang at Play X. Women and the Press-Gang XI. In the Clutch of the Gang XII. How the Gang went out Appendix : Admiral Young's Torpedo Index FAOB I 54 77 106 143 172 202 233 257 280 3" 331 335 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS An Unwelcome Visit from the Press Gang Frontispiece VAClVa PAOB Manning the Navy ...... 56 Reproduced by kind permission from a rare print in the collection of Mr. A. M. Broadlby. The Press-Gang seizing a Victim .... 80 Seizing a Waterman on Tower Hill on the Morning OF his Wedding Day . . . . .116 Jack in the Bilboes . . . . . .130 From the Painting by Morland. One of the Rarest of Press-Gang Records . .188 a play>bill announcing' the suspension of the Gang's operations on " Play Nights," in the collection of Mr. A. M. Broadlby, by whose kind permission it is reproduced. Sailors Carousing ...... 236 From the Mezzotint after J. Ibbbtson. Anne Mills who served on board the Maidstose in 1740 258 Mary Anne Talbot . . .266 Mary Anne Talbot dressed as a Sailor . . . 278 The Press Gang, or English Liberty Displayed . 306 Admiral Young's Torpedo ..... 332 Reproduced from the Original Drawing at the PubKc Record OfHce. THE PRESS-GANG CHAPTER I HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN The practice of pressing men that is to say, of taking by intimidation or force those who will not volunteer would seem to have been world-wide in its adoption. Wherever man desired to have a thing done, and was powerful enough to insure the doing of it, there he attained his end by the simple expedient of com- pelling others to do for him what he, unaided, could not do for himself. The individual, provided he did not conspire in sufficient numbers to impede or defeat the end in view, counted only as a food-consuming atom in the human mass which was set to work out the purpose of the master mind and hand. His face value in the problem was that of a living wage. If he sought to enhance his value by opposing the master hand, the master hand seized him and wrung his withers. So long as the compelling power confined the doing of the things it desired done to works of con- struction, it met with little opposition in its designs, experienced little difficulty in coercing the labour 2 THE PRESS GANG necessary for piling its walls, excavating its tanks, raising its pyramids and castles, or for levelling its roads and building its ships and cities. These were the commonplace achievements of peace, at which even the coerced might toil unafraid ; for apart from the normal incidence of death, such works entailed little danger to the lives of the multitudes who wrought upon them. Men could in consequence be procured for them by the exercise of the minimum of coercion by, that is to say, the mere threat of it. When peace went to the wall and the pressed man was called upon to go to battle, the case assumed another aspect, an acuter phase. Given a state of war, the danger to life and limb, the incidence of death, at once jumped enormously, and in proportion as these disquieting factors in the pressed man's lot mounted up, just in that proportion did his opposition to the power that sought to take him become the more determined, strenuous, and undisguised. Particularly was this true of warlike operations upon the sea, for to the extraordinary and terrible risks of war were here added the ordinary but ever- present dangers of wind and wave and storm, sufficient in themselves to appal the unacccustomed and to antagonise the unwilling. In face of these superlative risks the difficulty of procuring men was accentuated a thousand-fold, and with it both the nature and the degree of the coercive force necessary to be exercised for their procuration. In these circumstances the Ruling Power had no option but to resort to more exigent means of attaining its end. In times of peace, working through myriad hands, it had constructed a thousand monuments of HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 3 ornamental or utilitarian industry. These, with the commonweal they represented, were now threatened and must be protected at all costs. What more reasonable than to demand of those who had built, or of their successors in the perpetual inheritance of toil, that they should protect what they had reared. Hitherto, in most cases, the men required to meet the national need had submitted at a threat. They had to live, and coercive toil meant at least a living wage. Now, made rebellious by a fearful looking forward to the risks they were called upon to incur, they had to be met by more effective measures. Faced by this emergency, Power did not mince matters. It laid violent hands upon the unwilling subject and forced him, nolens volens, to sail its ships, to man its guns, and to fight its battles by sea as he already, under less overt compulsion, did its bidding by land. It is with this phase of pressing pressing open, violent and unashamed that we purpose here to deal, and more particularly with pressing as it applies to the sea and sailors, to the Navy and the defence of an Island Kingdom. At what time the pressing of men for the sea service of the Crown was first resorted to in these islands it is impossible to determine. There is evidence, however, that the practice was not only in vogue, but firmly established as an adjunct of power, as early as the days of the Saxon kings. It was, in fact, coeval with feudalism, of which it may be described as a side-issue incidental to a maritime situation ; for though it is impossible to point to any species of fee, as understood of the tenure of land, 4 THE PRESS-GANG under which the holder was liable to render service at sea, yet it must not be forgotten that the great ports of the kingdom, and more especially the Cinque Ports, were from time immemorial bound to find ships for national purposes, whenever called upon to do so, in return for the peculiar rights and privileges conferred upon them by the Crown. The supply of ships necessarily involved the supply of men to sail and fight them, and in this supply, or, rather, in the mode of obtaining it, we have undoubtedly the origin of the later impress system. With the reign of John the practice springs into sudden prominence. The incessant activities of that uneasy king led to almost incessant pressing, and at certain crises in his reign commission after commis- sion is directed, in feverish succession, to the sheriffs of counties and the bailiffs of seaports throughout the kingdom, straitly enjoining them to arrest and stay all ships within their respective jurisdictions, and with the ships the mariners who sail them.^ No exception was taken to these edicts. Long usage rendered the royal lien indefeasible.* ^ By a plausible euphemism they were said to be "hired." As a matter of fact, both ships and men were retained during the royal pleasure at rates fixed by custom. ' In more modem times the pressing of ships, though still put forward as a prerogative of the Crown, was confined in the main to un- foreseen exigencies of transport. On the fall of Louisburg in 1760, vessels were pressed at that port in order to carry the prisoners of war to France {Ad.* i. 1491 Capt. Byron, 17 June 1760) ; and in 1764, again, we find Capt. Brereton, of the Falmouth^ forcibly impressing the East India ship Revenge for the purpose of transporting to Fort St. George, in British India, the company, numbering some four hundred and twenty- one souls, of the Siam, then recently condemned at Manilla as unsea- worthy Ad. I. 1498 Letters of Capt. Brereton, 1764. Ad. , in the footnotes, signifies Admiralty Records, HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 5 In the carrying out of the royal commands there was consequently, at this stage in the development of pressing, little if any resort to direct coercion. From the very nature of the case the principle of coercion was there, but it was there only in the bud. The king's right to hale whom he would into his service being practically undisputed, a threat of reprisals in the event of disobedience answered all purposes, and even this threat was as yet more often implied than openly expressed. King John was perhaps the first to clothe it in words. Requisitioning the services of the mariners of Wales, a notoriously disloyal body, he gave the warrant, issued in 1208, a severely minatory turn. " Know ye for certain," it ran, " that if ye act contrary to this, we will cause you and the masters of your vessels to be hanged, and all your goods to be seized for our use." At this point in the gradual subjection of the seaman to the needs of the nation, defensive or the contrary, we are confronted by an event as remarkable in its nature as it is epoch-making in its consequences. Magna Charta was sealed on the 15th of June 1215, and within a year of that date, on, namely, the 14th of April then next ensuing. King John issued his commission to the barons of twenty-two seaports, requiring them, in terms admitting of neither mis- construction nor compromise, to arrest all ships, and to assemble those ships, together with their companies, in the River of Thames before a certain day.^ This wholesale embargo upon the shipping and seamen of the nation, imposed as it was immediately after the ensealing of Magna Charta, raises a question of great ^ Hardy, Rotuli Litterarum Clausarum^ 1833. 6 THE PRESS-GANG constitutional interest. In what sense, and to what extent, was the Charter of English Liberties intended to apply to the seafaring man ? Essentially a tyrant and a ruthless promise -breaker, John's natural cruelty would in itself sufficiently account for the dire penalties threatened under the warrant of 1208 ; but neither his tyranny, his faithless- ness of character, nor his very human irritation at the concessions wrung from him by his barons, can explain to our satisfaction why, having granted a charter affirming and safeguarding the liberties of, ostensibly, every class of his people, he should immediately inflict upon one of those classes, and that, too, the one least of all concerned in his historic dispute, the pains of a most rigorous impressment. The only rational ex- planation of his conduct is, that in thus acting he was contravening no convention, doing violence to no covenant, but was, on the contrary, merely exercising, in accordance with time-honoured usage, an already well-recognised, clearly defined and firmly seated prerogative which the great charter he had so recently put his hand to was in no sense intended to limit or annul. This view of the case is confirmed by subsequent events. Press warrants, identical in every respect save one with the historic warrant of 12 16, continued to emanate from the Crown long after King John had gone to his account, and, what is more to the point, to emanate unchallenged. Stubbs himself, our greatest constitutional authority, repeatedly admits as much. Every crisis in the destinies of the Island Kingdom and they were many and frequent pro- duced its batch of these procuratory documents, every HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 7 batch its quota of pressed men. The inference is plain. The mariner was the bondsman of the sea, and to him the Nullus liber homo capiattir clause of the Great Charter was never intended to apply. In his case a dead-letter from the first, it so remained throughout the entire chapter of his vicissitudes. The chief point wherein the warrants of later times differed from those of King John was this : As time went on the penalties they imposed on those who resisted the press became less and less severe. The death penalty fell into speedy disuse, if, indeed, it was ever inflicted at all. Imprisonment for a term of from one to two years, with forfeiture of goods, was held to meet all the exigencies of the case. Gradually even this modified practice underwent amelioration, until at length it dawned upon the official intelligence that a seaman who was free to respond to the summons of the boatswain's whistle constituted an infinitely more valuable physical asset than one who cursed his king and his Maker in irons. All punishment of the condign order, for contempt or resistance of the press, now went by the board, and in its stead the seaman was merely admonished in paternal fashion, as in a Proclamation of 1623, to take the king's shilling "dutifully and reverently" when it was tendered to him. In its apparent guilelessness the admonition was nevertheless woefully deceptive. Like the subdued beat of drum by which, some five years later, the seamen of London were lured to Tower Hill, there to be seized and thrown bodily into the waiting fleet, it masked under its mild exterior the old threat of coercion in a new form. The ancient pains and 8 THE PRESS-GANG penalties were indeed no more ; but for the back of the sailor who was so ill-advised as to defy the press there was another rod in pickle. He could now be taken forcibly. For side by side with the negative change involved in the abolition of the old punishments, there had been in progress, throughout the intervening centuries, a positive development of far worse omen for the hap- less sailor-man. The root-principle of direct coercion, necessarily inherent in any system that seeks to foist an arbitrary and obnoxious status upon any consider- able body of men, was slowly but surely bursting into bud. The years that had seen the unprested seaman freed from the dread of the yardarm and the horrors of the forepeak, had bred a new terror for him. Centuries of usage had strengthened the arm of that hated personage the Press-Master, and the compul- sion which had once skulked under cover of a threat now threw off its disguise and stalked the seafaring man for what it really was Force, open and un- ashamed. The dernier ressort of former days was now the first resort. The seafaring man who refused the king's service when " admonished " thereto had short shrift. He was "first knocked down, and then bade to stand in the king's name." Such, literally and without undue exaggeration, was the later system which, reaching the climax of its insolent pretensions to justifiable violence in the eighteenth century, for upwards of a hundred years bestrode the neck of the unfortunate sailor like some monstrous Old Man of the Sea. Outbursts of violent pressing before the dawn of the eighteenth century, though spasmodic and on the HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 9 whole infrequent, were not entirely unknown. Times of national stress were peculiarly productive of them. Thus when, in 1545, there was reason to fear a French invasion, pressing of the most violent and unprecedented character was openly resorted to in order to man the fleet. The class who suffered most severely on that occasion were the fisher folk of Devon, "the most part" of whom were "taken as marryners to serve the king." ^ During the Civil Wars of the next century both parties to the strife issued press warrants which were enforced with the utmost rigour. The Restoration saw a marked recrudescence of similar measures. How great was the need of men at that time, and how exigent the means employed to procure them, may be gathered from the fact, cited by Pepys, that in 1666 the fleet lay idle for a whole fortnight " without any demand for a farthing worth of anything, but only to get men." The genial diarist was deeply moved by the scenes of violence that followed. They were, he roundly declares, "a shame to think of." The origin of the term " pressing," with its cognates *' to press" and "pressed," is not less remarkable than the genesis of the violence it so aptly describes. Originally the man who was required for the king's service at sea, like his twin brother the soldier, was not "pressed" in the sense in which we now use the term. He was merely subjected to a process called "presting." To "prest" a man meant to enlist him by means of what was technically known ^ State Papers, Henry vill. Lord Russell to the Privy Council, 22 Aug. 1545. Bourne, who cites the incident in his Tudor Seamen.^ misses the essential point that the fishermen were forcibly pressed. 10 THE PRESS-GANG as " prest " money " prest " being the English equivalent of the obsolete F'rench prest, now prH, meaning "ready." In the recruiter's vocabulary, therefore, " prest " money stood for what is nowa- days, in both services, commonly termed the " king's shilling," and the man who, either voluntarily or under duress, accepted or received that shilling at the recruiter's hands, was said to be "prested " or "prest." In other words, having taken the king's ready money, he was thenceforth, during the king's pleasure, " ready " for the king's service. By the transfer of the prest shilling from the hand of the recruiter to the pouch of the seaman a subtle contract, as between the latter and his sovereign, was supposed to be set up, than which no more solemn or binding pact could exist save between a man and his Maker. One of the parties to the contract was more often than not, it is true, a strongly dissenting party ; but although under the common law of the land this circumstance would have rendered any similar con- tract null and void, in this amazing transaction between the king and his "prest" subject it was held to be of no vitiating force. From the moment the king's shilling, by whatever means, found its way into the sailor's possession, from that moment he was the king's man, bound in heavy penalties to toe the line of duty, and, should circumstances demand it, to fight the king's enemies to the death, be that fate either theirs or his. By some strange irony of circumstance there happened to be in the English language a word " pressed " which tallied almost exactly in pronuncia- tion with the old French ^Nord prest, so long employed, HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 11 as we have seen, to differentiate from his fellows the man who, by the devious means we have here described, was made "ready" for the sea service. " Press " means to constrain, to urge with force definitions precisely connoting the development and manner of violent enlistment. Hence, as the change from covert to overt violence grew in strength, "pressing," in the mouths of the people at large, came to be synonymous with that most obnoxious, oppressive and fear-inspiring system of recruiting which, in the course of time, took the place of its milder and more humane antecedent, " presting." The "prest" man disappeared,^ and in his stead there came upon the scene his later substitute the " pressed " man, " forced," as Pepys so graphically describes his condition, "against all law to be gone." An odder coincidence than this gradual substitution of " pressed " {or prest, or one more grimly appropriate in its applica- tion, it would surely be impossible to discover in the whose history of nomenclature. With the growth of the power and violence of the impress there was gradually inaugurated another change, which perhaps played a larger part than any other feature of the system in making it finally obnoxious to the nation at large finally, because, as we shall see, the nation long endured its exactions with pathetic submission and lamentable indifference. The incidence of pressing was no longer confined, as in its earlier stages, to the overflow of the populace ^ The Law Officers of the Crown retained him, on paper, until the close of the eighteenth century an example in which they were followed by the Admiralty. To admit his disappearance would have been to knock the bottom out of their case. 12 THE PRESS-GANG upon the country's rivers, and bays, and seas. Gradually, as naval needs grew in volume and urgency, the press net was cast wider and wider, until at length, during the great century of struggle, when the system was almost constantly working at its highest pressure and greatest efficiency, practically every class of the population of these islands was subjected to its merciless inroads, if not decimated by its indiscriminate exactions. On the very threshold of the century we stumble upon an episode curiously indicative of the set of the tide. Czar Peter of Russia had been recently in England, acquiring a knowledge of English customs which, on his return home, he immediately began to put in practice. His navy, such as it was, was wretchedly manned.^ Russian serfs made bad sailors and worse seamen. In the English ships thronging the quays at Archangel there was, however, plenty of good stuff men who could use the sea without being sick, men capable of carrying a ship to her destination without piling her up on the rocks or seeking nightly shelter under the land. He accordingly pressed every ninth man out of those ships. When news of this high - handed proceeding * The navy got together by Czar Peter had all but disappeared by the time Catherine ii. came to the throne. " Ichabod" was written over the doors of the Russian Admiralty. Their ships of war were few in number, unseaworthy, ill-found, ill-manned. Two thousand able-bodied seamen could with difficulty be got together in an emergency. The nominal fighting strength of the fleet stood high, but that strength in reality consisted of men " one half of whom had never sailed out of the Gulf of Finland, whilst the other half had never sailed anywhere at all.'' When the fleet was ordered to sea, the Admiralty " put soldiers on board, and by calling them sailors persuaded themselves that they really were so." State Papers^ Russia, vol. Ixxvii. Macartney, Nov. 1^27, 1766. HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 13 reached England, it roused the Queen and her advisers to indignation. Winter though it was, they lost no time in dispatching Charles Whitworth, a rising diplomat of the suavest type, as " Envoy Extraordinary to our Good (but naughty) Brother the Czar of Muscovy," with instructions to demand the release, immediate and unconditional, of the pressed men. Whitworth found the Czar at Moscow. The Autocrat of All the Russias listened affably enough to what he had to say, but refused his demand in terms that left scant room for doubt as to his sincerity of purpose, and none for protracted "conversations." "Every Prince," he declared for sole answer, "can take what he likes out of his own havens."^ The position thus taken up was unassailable. Centuries of usage hedged the prerogative in, and Queen Anne herself, in the few years she had been on the throne, had not only exercised it with a free hand, but had laid that hand without scruple upon many a foreign seaman. The lengths to which the system had gone by the end of the third quarter of the century is thrown into vivid relief by two incidents, one of which occurred in 1726, the other fifty years later. In the former year one William Kingston, pressed in the Downs a man who hailed from Lyme Regis and habitually "used the sea" was, notwithstanding that fact, discharged by express Admiralty order because he was a " substantial man and had a landed estate." 2 * Ad. 1. 1436 Capt J. Anderson's letters and enclosures ; State Papers, Russia, vol. iv. Whitworth to Secretary Harley. 2 Ad. I. 1473 Capt Charles Browne, 25 March 1726, and endorsement. 14 THE PRESS-GANG The incident of 1776, known as the Duncan case, occurred, or rather began, at North Shields. Lieu- tenant Oaks, captain of the press-gang in that town, one day met in the streets a man who, unfortunately for his future, " had the appearance of a seaman." He accordingly pressed him ; whereupon the man, whose name was Duncan, produced the title-deeds of certain house property in London, down Wapping way, worth some six pounds per annum, and claimed his discharge on the ground that as a freeholder and a voter he was immune from the press. The lieutenant laughed the suggestion to scorn, and Duncan was shipped south to the fleet. The matter did not end there. Duncan's friends espoused his cause and took energetic steps for his release. Threatened with an action at law, and averse from incurring either unnecessary risks or opprobrium where pressed men were concerned, the Admiralty referred the case to Mr. Attorney-General (afterwards Lord) Thurlow forliis opinion. The point of law Thurlow was called upon to resolve was, " Whether being a freeholder is an exception from being pressed ; " and as Duncan was represented in counsel's instructions on what ground, other than his "appearance," is not clear to be a man who habitually used the sea, it is hardly matter for surprise that the great jurist's opinion, biassed as it obviously was by that alleged fact, should have been altogether inimical to the pressed man and favourable to the Admiralty. ** I see no reason," he writes, in his crabbed hand and nervous diction, " why men using the sea, and being otherwise fit objects to be impressed into His HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 15 Majesty's service, should be exempted only because they are Freeholders. Nor did I ever read or hear of such an exemption. Therefore, unless some use or practice, which I am ignorant of, gives occasion to this doubt, I see no reason for a Mariner being discharged, seriously, because he is a Freeholder. It's a qualification easily attained : a single house at Wapping would ship a first-rate man-of-war. If a Freeholder is exempt, eo no7nine, it will be impossible to go on with the pressing service.^ There is no knowing a Freeholder by sight : and if claiming that character, or even showing deeds is sufficient, few Sailors will be without it."^ Backed by this opinion, so nicely in keeping with its own inclinations, the Admiralty kept the man. Its views, like its practice, had undergone an antipodal change since the Kingston incident of fifty years before. And possession, commonly reputed to be nine points of the law, more than made up for the lack of that element in Mr. Attorney-General's sophistical reasoning. In this respect Thurlow was in good company, for although Coke, who lived before violent pressing became the rule, had given it as his opinion that the king could not lawfully press men to serve him in his wars, the legal luminaries who came after him, and more particularly those of the eighteenth century, differed from him almost to a man. Blackstone, ^ It would have been equally impossible to go on with the naval service had the fleet contained many freeholders like John Barnes. Granted leave of absence from his ship, the Neptune, early in May, " in order to give his vote in the city," he " return'd not till the 8th of August." Ad. I. 2653 Capt. Whorwood, 23 Aug. 1741. * Ad. 7. 299 Law Officers' Opinions, i7S(>-77, No. 64. 16 THE PRESS-GANG whilst admitting that no statute expressly legalised pressing, reminded the nation with a leer, we might almost say that many statutes strongly implied, and hence so he put it amply justified it. In thus begging the question he had in mind the so-called Statutes of Exemption which, in protecting from impressment certain persons or classes of persons, proceeded on the assumption, so dear to the Sea Lords, that the Crown possessed the right to press all. This also was the view, taken by Yorke, Solicitor- General in 1757. "I take the prerogative," he declares, "to be most clearly legal." ^ Another group of lawyers took similar, though less exalted ground. Of these the most eminent was that "great oracle of law," Lord Mansfield. "The power of pressing," he contends, " is founded upon immemorial usage allowed for ages. If not, it can have no ground to stand upon. The practice is deduced from that trite maxim of the Constitutional Law of England, that private mischief had better be submitted to than that public detriment should ensue." The sea-lawyer had yet to be heard. With him "private mischief" counted for much, the usage of past ages for very little. He lived and suffered in the present. Of common law he knew nothing, but he possessed a fine appreciation of common justice, and this forced from him an indictment of the system that held him in thrall as scathing in its truth, its simplicity and its logic as it is spontaneous and untutored in its diction. " You confidently tell us," said he, dipping his * Ad. 7. 298 Law Officers' Opinions, 1733-56, No. 102. HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 17 pen in the gall of bitterness, "that our King is a father to us and our officers friends. They are so, we must confess, in some respects, for Indeed they use us like Children in Whiping us into Obedience. As for English Tars to be the Legitimate Sons of Liberty, it is an Old Cry which we have Experienced and Knows it to be False. God knows, the Con- stitution is admirable well Callculated for the Safety and Happiness of His Majesty's Subjects who live by Employments on Shore ; but alass, we are not Considered as Subjects of the same Sovereign, unless it be to Drag us by Force from our Families to Fight the Battles of a Country which Refuses us Protection." ^ Such, in rough outline, was the Impress System of the eighteenth century. In its inception, its development, and more especially in its extraordinary culmination, it perhaps constitutes the greatest anomaly, as it undoubtedly constitutes the grossest imposition, any free people ever submitted to. Although unlawful in the sense of having no founda- tion in law, and oppressive and unjust in that it yearly enslaved, under the most noxious conditions, thousands against their will, it was nevertheless for more than a hundred years tolerated and fostered as the readiest, speediest and most effective means humanly devisable for the manning of a fleet whose toll upon a free people, in the same period of time, swelled to more than thrice its original bulk. Standing as a bulwark against aggression and conquest, it ground under its heel the very people it protected, and made them slaves in order to keep them free. Masquerading as a protector, it dragged the wage-earner from his ^ Ad. I. 5125 Petitions of the Seamen of the Fleet, 1797. 2 18 THE PRESS-GANG home and cast his sta *ving family upon the doubtful mercies of the parish. And as if this were not enough, whilst justifying its existence on the score of public benefit it played havoc with the fisheries, clipped the wings of the merchant service, and sucked the life-blood out of trade. It was on the rising tide of such egregious con- tradictions as these that the press-gang came in ; for the press-gang was at once the embodiment and the active exponent of all that was anomalous or bad in the Impress System. CHAPTER II WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY The root of the necessity that seized the British sailor and made of him what he in time became, the most abject creature and the most efficient fighting unit the world has ever produced, lay in the fact that he was island-born. In that island a great and vigorous people had sprung into being a people great in their ambi- tions, commerce and dominion ; vigorous in holding what they had won against the assaults, meditated or actual, of those who envied their greatness and coveted their possessions. Of this island people, as of their world-wide interests, the "chiefest defence" was a "good fleet at sea."^ The Peace of Utrecht, marking though it did the close of the protracted war of the Spanish Succession, brought to the Island Kingdom not peace, but a sword ; for although its Navy was now as unrivalled as its commerce and empire, the supreme struggle for existence, under the guise of the mastery of the sea, was only just begun. De- cade after decade, as that struggle waxed and waned ^ This famous phrase is used, perhaps for the first time, by Josiah Burchett, sometime Secretary to the AdmiraUy, in his Observations on the Navy, 1700. 9 20 THE PRESS-GANG but went remorselessly on, the Navy grew in ships, the ships in tonnage and weight of metal, and with their growth the demand for men, imperative as the very existence of the nation, mounted ever higher and higher. In 1756 fifty thousand sufficed for the nation's needs. By 1780 the number had reached ninety-two thousand ; and with 1802 it touched high- water mark in the unprecedented total of one hundred and twenty-nine thousand men in actual sea pay.^ Beset by this enormous and steadily growing demand, the Admiralty, the defensive proxy of the nation, had perforce to face the question as to where and how the men were to be obtained. The source of supply was never at any time in doubt. Here, ready to hand, were some hundreds of thousands of persons using the sea, or following vocations merging into the sea in the capacity of colliers, bargemen, boatmen, longshoremen, fisher- men and deep-sea sailors or merchantmen, who constituted the natural Naval Reserve of an Island Kingdom a reserve ample, if judiciously drawn upon, to meet, and more than meet, the Navy's every need. The question of means was one more complicated, more delicate, and hence incomparably more difficult of solution. To draw largely upon these seafaring classes, numerous and fit though they were, meant detriment to trade, and if the Navy was the fist, trade was the backbone of the nation. The suffer- * Ad. 7. 567 Navy Progress, 1 756-1 805. These figures are below rather than above the mark, since the official returns on which they are based are admittedly deficient. WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY 21 ings of trade, moreover, reacted unpleasantly upon those in power at Whitehall. Methods of procura- tion must therefore be devised of a nature such as to insure that neither trade nor Admiralty should suffer that they should, in fact, enjoy what the unfortunate sailor never knew, some reasonable measure of ease. In its efforts to extricate itself and trade from the complex difficulties of the situation, Admiralty had at its back what an eighteenth century Beresford would doubtless have regarded as the finest talent of the service. Neither the unemployed admiral nor the half-pay captain had at that time, in his enforced retirement at Bath or Cheltenham, taken seriously to parliamenteering, company promoting, or the concocting of pedigrees as a substitute for walking the quarter-deck. His occupation was indeed gone, but in its stead there had come to him what he had rarely enjoyed whilst on the active service list opportunity. Carried away by the stimulus of so unprecedented a situation as that afforded by the chance to make himself heard, he rushed into print with projects and suggestions which would have revolutionised the naval policy and defence of the country at a stroke had they been carried into effect. Or he devoted his leisure to the invention of signal codes, semaphore systems, embryo torpedoes, gun carriages, and what is more to our point methods ostensibly calculated to man the fleet in the easiest, least oppressive and most expeditious manner possible for a free people. Armed with these schemes, he bombarded the Ad- miralty with all the pertinacity he had shown in 22 THE PRESS GANG his quarter-deck days in applying for leave or seeking promotion. Many, perhaps most, of the inventions which it was thus sought to father upon the Sea Lords, were happily never more heard of; but here and there one, commending itself by its seeming practicability, was selected for trial and duly put to the test. Fair to look upon while still in the air, these fruits of leisured superannuation proved deceptively unsound when plucked by the hand of experiment. Registration, first adopted in 1696, held out un- deniable advantages to the seaman. Under its provisions he drew a yearly allowance when not required at sea, and extra prize-money when on active service. Yet the bait did not tempt him, and the system was soon discarded as useless and inoperative. Bounty, defined by some sentimentalist as a "bribe to Neptune," for a while made a stronger appeal ; but, ranging as it did from five to almost any number of pounds under one hundred per head, it proved a bribe indeed, and by putting an irresist- ible premium on desertion threatened to decimate the very ships it was intended to man. In 1795 what was commonly known as the Quota Scheme superseded it. This was a plan of Pitt's devising, under which each county contributed to the fleet according to its population, the quota varying from one thousand and eighty-one men for Yorkshire to twenty-three for Rutland, whilst a minor Act levied special toll on seaports, London leading the way with five thousand seven hundred and four men. Like its predecessor Bounty, however, this mode of re- cruiting drained the Navy in order to feed it. Both WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY 23 systems, moreover, possessed another and more serious defect. When their initial enthusiasm had cooled, the counties, perhaps from force of habit as component parts of a country whose backbone was trade, bought in the cheapest market. Hence the Quota Man, consisting as he generally did of the offscourings of the merchant service, was seldom or never worth the money paid for him. An old man-o'-war's-man, picking up a miserable specimen of this class of recruit by the slack of his ragged breeches, remarked to his grinning messmates as he dangled the disreputable object before their eyes: "'Ere's a lubber as cost a guinea a pound!" He was not far out in his estimate. As in the case of the good old method of re- cruiting by beat of drum and the lure of the king's shilling, system after system thus failed to draw into its net, however speciously that net was spread, either the class or the number of men whose services it was desired to requisition. And whilst these futilities were working out their own condemnation the stormcloud of necessity grew bigger and bigger on the national horizon. Let trade suffer as it might, there was nothing for it but to discard all new-fangled notions and to revert to the system which the usage of ages had sanctioned. The return was imperative. Failing what Junius stigma- tised as the "spur of the Press," the right men in the right numbers were not to be procured. The wisdom of the nation was at fault. It could find no other way. There were, moreover, other reasons why the press-gang was to the Navy an indispensable ap- 24 THE PRESS GANG pendage reasons perhaps of little moment singly, but of tremendous weight in the scale of naval necessity when lumped together and taken in the aggregate. Of these the most prominent was that fatal flaw in naval administration which Nelson was in the habit of anathematising as the " Infernal System." Due partly to lack of foresight and false economy at Whitehall, partly to the character of the sailor himself, it resolved itself into this, that whenever a ship was paid off and put out of commission, all on board of her, excepting only her captain and her lieutenants, ceased to be officially connected with the Navy. Now, as ships were for various reasons constantly going out of commission, and as the paying off of a first- second- or third-rate automati- cally discharged from their country's employ a body of men many hundreds in number, the "lowering" effects of such a system, working year in, year out, upon a fleet always in chronic difficulties for men, may be more readily imagined than described. To a certain limited extent the loss to the service was minimised by a process called "turning over"; that is to say, the company of a ship paying off was turned over bodily, or as nearly intact as it was possible to preserve it, to another ship which at the moment chanced to be ready, or making ready, for sea. Or it might be that the commander of a ship paying off, transferred to another ship fitting out, carried the best men of his late command, com- monly known as "old standers," along with him. Unfortunately, the occasion of fitting out did not always coincide with the occasion of paying off; and WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY 25 although turnovers were frequently made by Ad- miralty order, there were serious obstacles in the way of their becoming general. Once the men were paid off, the Admiralty had no further hold upon them. By a stretch of authority they might, it is true, be confined to quarters or on board a guard- ship ; but if in these circumstances they rose in a body and got ashore, they could neither be retaken nor punished as deserters, but to use the good old service term had to be "rose" again by means of the press-gang. Turnovers, accordingly, depended mainly upon two closely related circumstances : the good- will of the men, and the popularity of commanders. A captain who was notorious for his use of the lash or the irons, or who was reputed unlucky, rarely if ever got a turnover except by the adoption of the most stringent measures. One who, on the other hand, treated his men with common humanity, who bested the enemy in fair fight and sent rich prizes into port, never wanted for " followers," and rarely, if ever, had recourse to the gang.^ Under such men ^ In his Autobiography Lord Dundonald asserts that he was only once obliged to resort to pressing a statement so remarkable, con- sidering the times he lived in, as to call for explanation. The occasion was when, returning from a year's " exile in a tub," a converted collier that " sailed like a hay-stack," he fitted out the Pallas at Portsmouth and could obtain no volunteers. Setting his gangs to work, he got together a scratch crew of the wretchedest description ; yet so mar- vellous were the personality and disciplinary ability of the man, that with only this unpromising material ready to his hand he intercepted the Spanish trade off Cape Finisterre and captured four successive prizes of very great value. The Pallas returned to Portsmouth with "three large golden candlesticks, each about five feet high, placed upon the mast-heads," and from that time onward Dundonald's reputa- tion as a "lucky" commander was made. He never again had occasion to invoke the aid of the gang. 26 THE PRESS GANG the seaman would gladly serve "even in a dung barge. "^ Unhappily for the service, such commanders were comparatively few, and in their absence the Infernal System drained the Navy of its best blood and accentuated a hundred-fold the already over- whelming need for the impress. The old-time sailor,* again, was essentially a creature of contradictions. Notorious for a " swear- ing rogue," who punctuated his strange sea-lingo with horrid oaths and appalling blasphemies, he made the responses required by the services of his Church with all the superstitious awe and tender piety of a child. Inconspicuous for his thrift or " forehandedness," it was nevertheless a common circumstance with him to have hundreds of pounds, in pay and prize-money, to his credit at his bankers, the Navy Pay-Office ; and though during a voyage he earned his money as hardly as a horse, and was as poor as a church mouse, yet the moment he stepped ashore he made it fly by the handful and squandered it, as the saying went, like an ass. When he was sober, which was seldom enough provided he could obtain drink, he possessed scarcely a rag to his back ; but when he was drunk he was himself the first to acknowledge that he had "too many cloths in the wind." According to his ^ Ad. I. 2733 Capt. Young, 28 Sept. 1776. The use of the word " sailor " was long regarded with disfavour by the Navy Board, who saw in it only a colourless substitute for the good old terms " seaman " and " mariner." Capt. Bertie, of the Ruby gunship, once reported the pressing of a "sailor," Thomas Letting by name, out of a collier in Yarmouth Roads, and was called upon by My Lords to define the new-fangled term. This he did with admirable circumlocution. " As for explaining the word ' sailor,' " said he, " I can doe it no otherwise than (by) letting of you know that Thomas Letting is a Sailor." .<4r'(',V>n Pi;i\ Nights, from the Hours oi Icui in ih.- ,\ir< .iioun !. Sixths following Morning, nftci wliitli time the iiici gciice ceafes. 1)1 riif" * Members] of the Jerufalem Coffee-Houfe. _ the THEATRE in North- Shields. On MONDAY, November 24th, 1794. Will b ptrformrd A ntw C O M K D Y. cjllrdllK: , World in a Village: TRIAL o/' FRIENDSHIP. WnlUH h IhM iu/lj tdchralril AKlb'.r. \. 0'Ktt>. Esq.. mJ /rrfirritil fr,-.,.- ,.., Si^bli Uf. Srafin il ibe Tbrjlrr Riyii:. a-.'cnl-C.jr.lgf, u-uh gtninil .l/fi^ialiiii. loIWlxly. (an honed Millfr) Mr C A W I) K, r. I,. Cingli", (Winc-incrcKam anj Bailwr) Mr 1' K I T C 11 A R I). A-Hiut, ( oilimun Dtcwcr) Mr W A T T "^ r Captiin Mullin.h.ick, (a St. Officer) Mr N K W ii O U N iX 0;.l Willow,, I Stcwird) Mr ' C O I. [. : K R. Cipt-un \anUmlcn, (a D..tLl,;i!au) Mr W A K W \ C. ,.. Kd.rd Bdlevuc, Mili t: A W n E I. I . f William BcMcvuf. Mr \V 11 K F. I. R P. Old Soldier, Mr II U G G 1 N >. Cl.irks, (alonur.atr_A,!vc:'.f..Kt) Mr r;i;AIIA_\;, touifa, ' Mis <; O I. I. i K K. . Mr, Albut, .Mis N . V.' U () U N IX , . Maria Willow-,. Mi- M L C, C, IN?. Margery Jollyboy, Mrs U 11 K r'. 1. E l(. Mu Ucilouc,'.'- I..rd; :. I)^ v.iiHinp a Comic Song, lalltd _ I' Paddy Bull's yourney from Dublin to London, i \ ' l.ndo! thcl'lay, MrrAWiJti.l, .. i;I lin,.. .1 Uin.icSor.s, cilcd T lie Tippies of Ninety Four: I ^ T/je Golden Days we now PoJ/efs, Sir. i, p' lirt.,rt Ihc Farct, Mrs 111 C ti 1 N R (l.v IX-iirc) wiil Tin; -^ ? '^ Yes Kind Sir and I'll Thank you too." ' ] f InJolAit 2d..l"i'icKir.<-, Mr WHF.KLKR will It.g Afc .;>/*/, favoi.ri.c 1 ^ Hunting .Song, in Drd's and Clijr.ia7r. called ^ J OLD TOWLER'. :-, -hi ' w,iii.r.Hcd,A .a.-Vr.,-<.nA:', c, K,, ,:: ,! r,- y - i. MIDNIGHT HOUR? J Diamond Cut Diamonct.'^ :..',-, Mr (J ;: .\H A VI. y r,rnculir,.ii<-.r.mjn. .\:, N t^ VV 15 O C X i,. , : w^ Nicl)ol,w, (tl-e i"'fr