;;yi'I^>I-:Ii;^fMr>>^lS:.T^^^%^^'.v...-.,.-,.^^.i;3^i'l:^^ii^;w
The Press-Gang
AFLOAT AND ASHORE
n
Sv-f'
J. R.. HUTCHINSON
THE LIBRARY
OF
THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
RIVERSIDE
\
THE PRESS-GANG
THE PRESS-GANG
AFLOAT AND ASHORE
BY
J. R HUTCHINSON
NEW YORK
E. P. DUTTON & CO,
1914
CONTENTS
CHAP.
I. How THE Press-Gang came in
II. Why the Gang was necessary
III. What the Press-Gang was .
IV. Whom the Gang might take
V, What the Gang did Afloat
VI. Evading the Gang
VII. What the Gang did Ashore
VIII. At Grips with the Gang
IX. The Gang at Play
X. Women and the Press-Gang
XI. In the Clutch of the Gang
XII. How the Gang went out
Appendix : Admiral Young's Torpedo
Index
FAOB
I
54
77
106
143
172
202
233
257
280
3"
331
335
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
An Unwelcome Visit from the Press Gang Frontispiece
VAClVa PAOB
Manning the Navy ...... 56
Reproduced by kind permission from a rare print in the collection of
Mr. A. M. Broadlby.
The Press-Gang seizing a Victim .... 80
Seizing a Waterman on Tower Hill on the Morning
OF his Wedding Day . . . . .116
Jack in the Bilboes . . . . . .130
From the Painting by Morland.
One of the Rarest of Press-Gang Records . .188
a play>bill announcing' the suspension of the Gang's operations on
" Play Nights," in the collection of Mr. A. M. Broadlby, by
whose kind permission it is reproduced.
Sailors Carousing ...... 236
From the Mezzotint after J. Ibbbtson.
Anne Mills who served on board the Maidstose in 1740 258
Mary Anne Talbot . . .266
Mary Anne Talbot dressed as a Sailor . . . 278
The Press Gang, or English Liberty Displayed . 306
Admiral Young's Torpedo ..... 332
Reproduced from the Original Drawing at the PubKc Record OfHce.
THE PRESS-GANG
CHAPTER I
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN
The practice of pressing men that is to say, of
taking by intimidation or force those who will not
volunteer would seem to have been world-wide in its
adoption.
Wherever man desired to have a thing done, and
was powerful enough to insure the doing of it, there
he attained his end by the simple expedient of com-
pelling others to do for him what he, unaided, could
not do for himself.
The individual, provided he did not conspire in
sufficient numbers to impede or defeat the end in
view, counted only as a food-consuming atom in the
human mass which was set to work out the purpose
of the master mind and hand. His face value in the
problem was that of a living wage. If he sought to
enhance his value by opposing the master hand, the
master hand seized him and wrung his withers.
So long as the compelling power confined the
doing of the things it desired done to works of con-
struction, it met with little opposition in its designs,
experienced little difficulty in coercing the labour
2 THE PRESS GANG
necessary for piling its walls, excavating its tanks,
raising its pyramids and castles, or for levelling its
roads and building its ships and cities. These were
the commonplace achievements of peace, at which
even the coerced might toil unafraid ; for apart from
the normal incidence of death, such works entailed
little danger to the lives of the multitudes who wrought
upon them. Men could in consequence be procured
for them by the exercise of the minimum of coercion
by, that is to say, the mere threat of it.
When peace went to the wall and the pressed
man was called upon to go to battle, the case assumed
another aspect, an acuter phase. Given a state of
war, the danger to life and limb, the incidence of
death, at once jumped enormously, and in proportion
as these disquieting factors in the pressed man's lot
mounted up, just in that proportion did his opposition
to the power that sought to take him become the
more determined, strenuous, and undisguised.
Particularly was this true of warlike operations
upon the sea, for to the extraordinary and terrible
risks of war were here added the ordinary but ever-
present dangers of wind and wave and storm, sufficient
in themselves to appal the unacccustomed and to
antagonise the unwilling. In face of these superlative
risks the difficulty of procuring men was accentuated
a thousand-fold, and with it both the nature and the
degree of the coercive force necessary to be exercised
for their procuration.
In these circumstances the Ruling Power had no
option but to resort to more exigent means of attaining
its end. In times of peace, working through myriad
hands, it had constructed a thousand monuments of
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 3
ornamental or utilitarian industry. These, with the
commonweal they represented, were now threatened
and must be protected at all costs. What more
reasonable than to demand of those who had built,
or of their successors in the perpetual inheritance of
toil, that they should protect what they had reared.
Hitherto, in most cases, the men required to meet
the national need had submitted at a threat. They
had to live, and coercive toil meant at least a living
wage. Now, made rebellious by a fearful looking
forward to the risks they were called upon to incur,
they had to be met by more effective measures.
Faced by this emergency, Power did not mince
matters. It laid violent hands upon the unwilling
subject and forced him, nolens volens, to sail its ships,
to man its guns, and to fight its battles by sea as he
already, under less overt compulsion, did its bidding
by land.
It is with this phase of pressing pressing open,
violent and unashamed that we purpose here to deal,
and more particularly with pressing as it applies to
the sea and sailors, to the Navy and the defence of an
Island Kingdom.
At what time the pressing of men for the sea
service of the Crown was first resorted to in these
islands it is impossible to determine. There is
evidence, however, that the practice was not only
in vogue, but firmly established as an adjunct of
power, as early as the days of the Saxon kings. It
was, in fact, coeval with feudalism, of which it may
be described as a side-issue incidental to a maritime
situation ; for though it is impossible to point to any
species of fee, as understood of the tenure of land,
4 THE PRESS-GANG
under which the holder was liable to render service at
sea, yet it must not be forgotten that the great ports
of the kingdom, and more especially the Cinque Ports,
were from time immemorial bound to find ships for
national purposes, whenever called upon to do so, in
return for the peculiar rights and privileges conferred
upon them by the Crown. The supply of ships
necessarily involved the supply of men to sail and
fight them, and in this supply, or, rather, in the mode
of obtaining it, we have undoubtedly the origin of the
later impress system.
With the reign of John the practice springs into
sudden prominence. The incessant activities of that
uneasy king led to almost incessant pressing, and at
certain crises in his reign commission after commis-
sion is directed, in feverish succession, to the sheriffs
of counties and the bailiffs of seaports throughout the
kingdom, straitly enjoining them to arrest and stay all
ships within their respective jurisdictions, and with the
ships the mariners who sail them.^ No exception was
taken to these edicts. Long usage rendered the royal
lien indefeasible.*
^ By a plausible euphemism they were said to be "hired." As a
matter of fact, both ships and men were retained during the royal
pleasure at rates fixed by custom.
' In more modem times the pressing of ships, though still put
forward as a prerogative of the Crown, was confined in the main to un-
foreseen exigencies of transport. On the fall of Louisburg in 1760,
vessels were pressed at that port in order to carry the prisoners of war
to France {Ad.* i. 1491 Capt. Byron, 17 June 1760) ; and in 1764, again,
we find Capt. Brereton, of the Falmouth^ forcibly impressing the East
India ship Revenge for the purpose of transporting to Fort St. George,
in British India, the company, numbering some four hundred and twenty-
one souls, of the Siam, then recently condemned at Manilla as unsea-
worthy Ad. I. 1498 Letters of Capt. Brereton, 1764.
Ad. , in the footnotes, signifies Admiralty Records,
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 5
In the carrying out of the royal commands there
was consequently, at this stage in the development of
pressing, little if any resort to direct coercion. From
the very nature of the case the principle of coercion
was there, but it was there only in the bud. The
king's right to hale whom he would into his service
being practically undisputed, a threat of reprisals in
the event of disobedience answered all purposes, and
even this threat was as yet more often implied than
openly expressed. King John was perhaps the first
to clothe it in words. Requisitioning the services of
the mariners of Wales, a notoriously disloyal body, he
gave the warrant, issued in 1208, a severely minatory
turn. " Know ye for certain," it ran, " that if ye act
contrary to this, we will cause you and the masters of
your vessels to be hanged, and all your goods to be
seized for our use."
At this point in the gradual subjection of the
seaman to the needs of the nation, defensive or the
contrary, we are confronted by an event as remarkable
in its nature as it is epoch-making in its consequences.
Magna Charta was sealed on the 15th of June 1215,
and within a year of that date, on, namely, the 14th
of April then next ensuing. King John issued his
commission to the barons of twenty-two seaports,
requiring them, in terms admitting of neither mis-
construction nor compromise, to arrest all ships, and
to assemble those ships, together with their companies,
in the River of Thames before a certain day.^ This
wholesale embargo upon the shipping and seamen of
the nation, imposed as it was immediately after the
ensealing of Magna Charta, raises a question of great
^ Hardy, Rotuli Litterarum Clausarum^ 1833.
6 THE PRESS-GANG
constitutional interest. In what sense, and to what
extent, was the Charter of English Liberties intended
to apply to the seafaring man ?
Essentially a tyrant and a ruthless promise -breaker,
John's natural cruelty would in itself sufficiently
account for the dire penalties threatened under the
warrant of 1208 ; but neither his tyranny, his faithless-
ness of character, nor his very human irritation at the
concessions wrung from him by his barons, can explain
to our satisfaction why, having granted a charter
affirming and safeguarding the liberties of, ostensibly,
every class of his people, he should immediately inflict
upon one of those classes, and that, too, the one least
of all concerned in his historic dispute, the pains of a
most rigorous impressment. The only rational ex-
planation of his conduct is, that in thus acting he was
contravening no convention, doing violence to no
covenant, but was, on the contrary, merely exercising,
in accordance with time-honoured usage, an already
well-recognised, clearly defined and firmly seated
prerogative which the great charter he had so recently
put his hand to was in no sense intended to limit
or annul.
This view of the case is confirmed by subsequent
events. Press warrants, identical in every respect
save one with the historic warrant of 12 16, continued
to emanate from the Crown long after King John
had gone to his account, and, what is more to the
point, to emanate unchallenged. Stubbs himself, our
greatest constitutional authority, repeatedly admits as
much. Every crisis in the destinies of the Island
Kingdom and they were many and frequent pro-
duced its batch of these procuratory documents, every
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 7
batch its quota of pressed men. The inference is
plain. The mariner was the bondsman of the sea,
and to him the Nullus liber homo capiattir clause of
the Great Charter was never intended to apply. In
his case a dead-letter from the first, it so remained
throughout the entire chapter of his vicissitudes.
The chief point wherein the warrants of later times
differed from those of King John was this : As time
went on the penalties they imposed on those who
resisted the press became less and less severe. The
death penalty fell into speedy disuse, if, indeed, it was
ever inflicted at all. Imprisonment for a term of from
one to two years, with forfeiture of goods, was held to
meet all the exigencies of the case. Gradually even
this modified practice underwent amelioration, until at
length it dawned upon the official intelligence that a
seaman who was free to respond to the summons of
the boatswain's whistle constituted an infinitely more
valuable physical asset than one who cursed his king
and his Maker in irons. All punishment of the
condign order, for contempt or resistance of the press,
now went by the board, and in its stead the seaman
was merely admonished in paternal fashion, as in a
Proclamation of 1623, to take the king's shilling
"dutifully and reverently" when it was tendered
to him.
In its apparent guilelessness the admonition was
nevertheless woefully deceptive. Like the subdued
beat of drum by which, some five years later, the
seamen of London were lured to Tower Hill, there to
be seized and thrown bodily into the waiting fleet, it
masked under its mild exterior the old threat of
coercion in a new form. The ancient pains and
8 THE PRESS-GANG
penalties were indeed no more ; but for the back of
the sailor who was so ill-advised as to defy the press
there was another rod in pickle. He could now be
taken forcibly.
For side by side with the negative change involved
in the abolition of the old punishments, there had been
in progress, throughout the intervening centuries, a
positive development of far worse omen for the hap-
less sailor-man. The root-principle of direct coercion,
necessarily inherent in any system that seeks to foist
an arbitrary and obnoxious status upon any consider-
able body of men, was slowly but surely bursting into
bud. The years that had seen the unprested seaman
freed from the dread of the yardarm and the horrors
of the forepeak, had bred a new terror for him.
Centuries of usage had strengthened the arm of that
hated personage the Press-Master, and the compul-
sion which had once skulked under cover of a threat
now threw off its disguise and stalked the seafaring
man for what it really was Force, open and un-
ashamed. The dernier ressort of former days was
now the first resort. The seafaring man who refused
the king's service when " admonished " thereto had
short shrift. He was "first knocked down, and then
bade to stand in the king's name." Such, literally
and without undue exaggeration, was the later system
which, reaching the climax of its insolent pretensions
to justifiable violence in the eighteenth century, for
upwards of a hundred years bestrode the neck of the
unfortunate sailor like some monstrous Old Man of
the Sea.
Outbursts of violent pressing before the dawn of
the eighteenth century, though spasmodic and on the
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 9
whole infrequent, were not entirely unknown. Times
of national stress were peculiarly productive of them.
Thus when, in 1545, there was reason to fear a
French invasion, pressing of the most violent and
unprecedented character was openly resorted to in
order to man the fleet. The class who suffered most
severely on that occasion were the fisher folk of
Devon, "the most part" of whom were "taken as
marryners to serve the king." ^
During the Civil Wars of the next century both
parties to the strife issued press warrants which were
enforced with the utmost rigour. The Restoration saw
a marked recrudescence of similar measures. How
great was the need of men at that time, and how
exigent the means employed to procure them, may be
gathered from the fact, cited by Pepys, that in 1666
the fleet lay idle for a whole fortnight " without any
demand for a farthing worth of anything, but only to
get men." The genial diarist was deeply moved by
the scenes of violence that followed. They were, he
roundly declares, "a shame to think of."
The origin of the term " pressing," with its cognates
*' to press" and "pressed," is not less remarkable than
the genesis of the violence it so aptly describes.
Originally the man who was required for the king's
service at sea, like his twin brother the soldier, was
not "pressed" in the sense in which we now use
the term. He was merely subjected to a process
called "presting." To "prest" a man meant to
enlist him by means of what was technically known
^ State Papers, Henry vill. Lord Russell to the Privy Council,
22 Aug. 1545. Bourne, who cites the incident in his Tudor Seamen.^
misses the essential point that the fishermen were forcibly pressed.
10 THE PRESS-GANG
as " prest " money " prest " being the English
equivalent of the obsolete F'rench prest, now prH,
meaning "ready." In the recruiter's vocabulary,
therefore, " prest " money stood for what is nowa-
days, in both services, commonly termed the " king's
shilling," and the man who, either voluntarily or under
duress, accepted or received that shilling at the
recruiter's hands, was said to be "prested " or "prest."
In other words, having taken the king's ready money,
he was thenceforth, during the king's pleasure, " ready "
for the king's service.
By the transfer of the prest shilling from the hand
of the recruiter to the pouch of the seaman a subtle
contract, as between the latter and his sovereign, was
supposed to be set up, than which no more solemn or
binding pact could exist save between a man and his
Maker. One of the parties to the contract was more
often than not, it is true, a strongly dissenting party ;
but although under the common law of the land this
circumstance would have rendered any similar con-
tract null and void, in this amazing transaction between
the king and his "prest" subject it was held to be
of no vitiating force. From the moment the king's
shilling, by whatever means, found its way into the
sailor's possession, from that moment he was the
king's man, bound in heavy penalties to toe the line of
duty, and, should circumstances demand it, to fight
the king's enemies to the death, be that fate either
theirs or his.
By some strange irony of circumstance there
happened to be in the English language a word
" pressed " which tallied almost exactly in pronuncia-
tion with the old French ^Nord prest, so long employed,
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 11
as we have seen, to differentiate from his fellows
the man who, by the devious means we have here
described, was made "ready" for the sea service.
" Press " means to constrain, to urge with force
definitions precisely connoting the development and
manner of violent enlistment. Hence, as the change
from covert to overt violence grew in strength,
"pressing," in the mouths of the people at large,
came to be synonymous with that most obnoxious,
oppressive and fear-inspiring system of recruiting
which, in the course of time, took the place of its
milder and more humane antecedent, " presting."
The "prest" man disappeared,^ and in his stead there
came upon the scene his later substitute the " pressed "
man, " forced," as Pepys so graphically describes his
condition, "against all law to be gone." An odder
coincidence than this gradual substitution of " pressed "
{or prest, or one more grimly appropriate in its applica-
tion, it would surely be impossible to discover in the
whose history of nomenclature.
With the growth of the power and violence of the
impress there was gradually inaugurated another
change, which perhaps played a larger part than any
other feature of the system in making it finally
obnoxious to the nation at large finally, because,
as we shall see, the nation long endured its exactions
with pathetic submission and lamentable indifference.
The incidence of pressing was no longer confined,
as in its earlier stages, to the overflow of the populace
^ The Law Officers of the Crown retained him, on paper, until the
close of the eighteenth century an example in which they were followed
by the Admiralty. To admit his disappearance would have been to
knock the bottom out of their case.
12 THE PRESS-GANG
upon the country's rivers, and bays, and seas.
Gradually, as naval needs grew in volume and urgency,
the press net was cast wider and wider, until at
length, during the great century of struggle, when
the system was almost constantly working at its
highest pressure and greatest efficiency, practically
every class of the population of these islands was
subjected to its merciless inroads, if not decimated by
its indiscriminate exactions.
On the very threshold of the century we stumble
upon an episode curiously indicative of the set of the
tide. Czar Peter of Russia had been recently in
England, acquiring a knowledge of English customs
which, on his return home, he immediately began to
put in practice. His navy, such as it was, was
wretchedly manned.^ Russian serfs made bad sailors
and worse seamen. In the English ships thronging
the quays at Archangel there was, however, plenty of
good stuff men who could use the sea without being
sick, men capable of carrying a ship to her destination
without piling her up on the rocks or seeking nightly
shelter under the land. He accordingly pressed every
ninth man out of those ships.
When news of this high - handed proceeding
* The navy got together by Czar Peter had all but disappeared by
the time Catherine ii. came to the throne. " Ichabod" was written over
the doors of the Russian Admiralty. Their ships of war were few in
number, unseaworthy, ill-found, ill-manned. Two thousand able-bodied
seamen could with difficulty be got together in an emergency. The
nominal fighting strength of the fleet stood high, but that strength in
reality consisted of men " one half of whom had never sailed out of the
Gulf of Finland, whilst the other half had never sailed anywhere at all.''
When the fleet was ordered to sea, the Admiralty " put soldiers on
board, and by calling them sailors persuaded themselves that they really
were so." State Papers^ Russia, vol. Ixxvii. Macartney, Nov. 1^27,
1766.
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 13
reached England, it roused the Queen and her
advisers to indignation. Winter though it was, they
lost no time in dispatching Charles Whitworth, a
rising diplomat of the suavest type, as " Envoy
Extraordinary to our Good (but naughty) Brother the
Czar of Muscovy," with instructions to demand the
release, immediate and unconditional, of the pressed
men. Whitworth found the Czar at Moscow. The
Autocrat of All the Russias listened affably enough
to what he had to say, but refused his demand in
terms that left scant room for doubt as to his sincerity
of purpose, and none for protracted "conversations."
"Every Prince," he declared for sole answer, "can
take what he likes out of his own havens."^ The
position thus taken up was unassailable. Centuries
of usage hedged the prerogative in, and Queen Anne
herself, in the few years she had been on the throne,
had not only exercised it with a free hand, but had
laid that hand without scruple upon many a foreign
seaman.
The lengths to which the system had gone by the
end of the third quarter of the century is thrown into
vivid relief by two incidents, one of which occurred in
1726, the other fifty years later.
In the former year one William Kingston, pressed
in the Downs a man who hailed from Lyme Regis
and habitually "used the sea" was, notwithstanding
that fact, discharged by express Admiralty order
because he was a " substantial man and had a landed
estate." 2
* Ad. 1. 1436 Capt J. Anderson's letters and enclosures ; State
Papers, Russia, vol. iv. Whitworth to Secretary Harley.
2 Ad. I. 1473 Capt Charles Browne, 25 March 1726, and
endorsement.
14 THE PRESS-GANG
The incident of 1776, known as the Duncan case,
occurred, or rather began, at North Shields. Lieu-
tenant Oaks, captain of the press-gang in that town,
one day met in the streets a man who, unfortunately
for his future, " had the appearance of a seaman."
He accordingly pressed him ; whereupon the man,
whose name was Duncan, produced the title-deeds of
certain house property in London, down Wapping
way, worth some six pounds per annum, and claimed
his discharge on the ground that as a freeholder and
a voter he was immune from the press. The lieutenant
laughed the suggestion to scorn, and Duncan was
shipped south to the fleet.
The matter did not end there. Duncan's friends
espoused his cause and took energetic steps for his
release. Threatened with an action at law, and averse
from incurring either unnecessary risks or opprobrium
where pressed men were concerned, the Admiralty
referred the case to Mr. Attorney-General (afterwards
Lord) Thurlow forliis opinion.
The point of law Thurlow was called upon to
resolve was, " Whether being a freeholder is an
exception from being pressed ; " and as Duncan was
represented in counsel's instructions on what ground,
other than his "appearance," is not clear to be a man
who habitually used the sea, it is hardly matter for
surprise that the great jurist's opinion, biassed as it
obviously was by that alleged fact, should have been
altogether inimical to the pressed man and favourable
to the Admiralty.
** I see no reason," he writes, in his crabbed hand
and nervous diction, " why men using the sea, and
being otherwise fit objects to be impressed into His
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 15
Majesty's service, should be exempted only because
they are Freeholders. Nor did I ever read or hear
of such an exemption. Therefore, unless some use or
practice, which I am ignorant of, gives occasion to
this doubt, I see no reason for a Mariner being
discharged, seriously, because he is a Freeholder.
It's a qualification easily attained : a single house
at Wapping would ship a first-rate man-of-war. If
a Freeholder is exempt, eo no7nine, it will be impossible
to go on with the pressing service.^ There is no
knowing a Freeholder by sight : and if claiming that
character, or even showing deeds is sufficient, few
Sailors will be without it."^
Backed by this opinion, so nicely in keeping with
its own inclinations, the Admiralty kept the man.
Its views, like its practice, had undergone an antipodal
change since the Kingston incident of fifty years
before. And possession, commonly reputed to be
nine points of the law, more than made up for the
lack of that element in Mr. Attorney-General's
sophistical reasoning.
In this respect Thurlow was in good company,
for although Coke, who lived before violent pressing
became the rule, had given it as his opinion that the
king could not lawfully press men to serve him in his
wars, the legal luminaries who came after him,
and more particularly those of the eighteenth century,
differed from him almost to a man. Blackstone,
^ It would have been equally impossible to go on with the naval
service had the fleet contained many freeholders like John Barnes.
Granted leave of absence from his ship, the Neptune, early in May, " in
order to give his vote in the city," he " return'd not till the 8th of
August." Ad. I. 2653 Capt. Whorwood, 23 Aug. 1741.
* Ad. 7. 299 Law Officers' Opinions, i7S(>-77, No. 64.
16 THE PRESS-GANG
whilst admitting that no statute expressly legalised
pressing, reminded the nation with a leer, we
might almost say that many statutes strongly implied,
and hence so he put it amply justified it. In thus
begging the question he had in mind the so-called
Statutes of Exemption which, in protecting from
impressment certain persons or classes of persons,
proceeded on the assumption, so dear to the Sea
Lords, that the Crown possessed the right to press all.
This also was the view, taken by Yorke, Solicitor-
General in 1757. "I take the prerogative," he
declares, "to be most clearly legal." ^
Another group of lawyers took similar, though
less exalted ground. Of these the most eminent was
that "great oracle of law," Lord Mansfield. "The
power of pressing," he contends, " is founded upon
immemorial usage allowed for ages. If not, it can
have no ground to stand upon. The practice is
deduced from that trite maxim of the Constitutional
Law of England, that private mischief had better
be submitted to than that public detriment should
ensue."
The sea-lawyer had yet to be heard. With him
"private mischief" counted for much, the usage of
past ages for very little. He lived and suffered in
the present. Of common law he knew nothing, but
he possessed a fine appreciation of common justice,
and this forced from him an indictment of the system
that held him in thrall as scathing in its truth, its
simplicity and its logic as it is spontaneous and
untutored in its diction.
" You confidently tell us," said he, dipping his
* Ad. 7. 298 Law Officers' Opinions, 1733-56, No. 102.
HOW THE PRESS-GANG CAME IN 17
pen in the gall of bitterness, "that our King is
a father to us and our officers friends. They are so,
we must confess, in some respects, for Indeed they
use us like Children in Whiping us into Obedience.
As for English Tars to be the Legitimate Sons of
Liberty, it is an Old Cry which we have Experienced
and Knows it to be False. God knows, the Con-
stitution is admirable well Callculated for the Safety
and Happiness of His Majesty's Subjects who live
by Employments on Shore ; but alass, we are not
Considered as Subjects of the same Sovereign, unless
it be to Drag us by Force from our Families to Fight
the Battles of a Country which Refuses us Protection." ^
Such, in rough outline, was the Impress System
of the eighteenth century. In its inception, its
development, and more especially in its extraordinary
culmination, it perhaps constitutes the greatest
anomaly, as it undoubtedly constitutes the grossest
imposition, any free people ever submitted to.
Although unlawful in the sense of having no founda-
tion in law, and oppressive and unjust in that it yearly
enslaved, under the most noxious conditions, thousands
against their will, it was nevertheless for more than
a hundred years tolerated and fostered as the readiest,
speediest and most effective means humanly devisable
for the manning of a fleet whose toll upon a free
people, in the same period of time, swelled to more
than thrice its original bulk. Standing as a bulwark
against aggression and conquest, it ground under its
heel the very people it protected, and made them
slaves in order to keep them free. Masquerading
as a protector, it dragged the wage-earner from his
^ Ad. I. 5125 Petitions of the Seamen of the Fleet, 1797.
2
18 THE PRESS-GANG
home and cast his sta *ving family upon the doubtful
mercies of the parish. And as if this were not
enough, whilst justifying its existence on the score
of public benefit it played havoc with the fisheries,
clipped the wings of the merchant service, and sucked
the life-blood out of trade.
It was on the rising tide of such egregious con-
tradictions as these that the press-gang came in ; for
the press-gang was at once the embodiment and the
active exponent of all that was anomalous or bad in
the Impress System.
CHAPTER II
WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY
The root of the necessity that seized the British
sailor and made of him what he in time became,
the most abject creature and the most efficient
fighting unit the world has ever produced, lay in
the fact that he was island-born.
In that island a great and vigorous people had
sprung into being a people great in their ambi-
tions, commerce and dominion ; vigorous in holding
what they had won against the assaults, meditated
or actual, of those who envied their greatness and
coveted their possessions. Of this island people, as
of their world-wide interests, the "chiefest defence"
was a "good fleet at sea."^
The Peace of Utrecht, marking though it did
the close of the protracted war of the Spanish
Succession, brought to the Island Kingdom not
peace, but a sword ; for although its Navy was
now as unrivalled as its commerce and empire, the
supreme struggle for existence, under the guise of
the mastery of the sea, was only just begun. De-
cade after decade, as that struggle waxed and waned
^ This famous phrase is used, perhaps for the first time, by Josiah
Burchett, sometime Secretary to the AdmiraUy, in his Observations on
the Navy, 1700.
9
20 THE PRESS-GANG
but went remorselessly on, the Navy grew in ships,
the ships in tonnage and weight of metal, and with
their growth the demand for men, imperative as the
very existence of the nation, mounted ever higher
and higher. In 1756 fifty thousand sufficed for the
nation's needs. By 1780 the number had reached
ninety-two thousand ; and with 1802 it touched high-
water mark in the unprecedented total of one
hundred and twenty-nine thousand men in actual
sea pay.^
Beset by this enormous and steadily growing
demand, the Admiralty, the defensive proxy of the
nation, had perforce to face the question as to
where and how the men were to be obtained.
The source of supply was never at any time in
doubt. Here, ready to hand, were some hundreds
of thousands of persons using the sea, or following
vocations merging into the sea in the capacity of
colliers, bargemen, boatmen, longshoremen, fisher-
men and deep-sea sailors or merchantmen, who
constituted the natural Naval Reserve of an Island
Kingdom a reserve ample, if judiciously drawn
upon, to meet, and more than meet, the Navy's
every need.
The question of means was one more complicated,
more delicate, and hence incomparably more difficult
of solution. To draw largely upon these seafaring
classes, numerous and fit though they were, meant
detriment to trade, and if the Navy was the fist,
trade was the backbone of the nation. The suffer-
* Ad. 7. 567 Navy Progress, 1 756-1 805. These figures are below
rather than above the mark, since the official returns on which they
are based are admittedly deficient.
WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY 21
ings of trade, moreover, reacted unpleasantly upon
those in power at Whitehall. Methods of procura-
tion must therefore be devised of a nature such as
to insure that neither trade nor Admiralty should
suffer that they should, in fact, enjoy what the
unfortunate sailor never knew, some reasonable
measure of ease.
In its efforts to extricate itself and trade from
the complex difficulties of the situation, Admiralty
had at its back what an eighteenth century Beresford
would doubtless have regarded as the finest talent
of the service. Neither the unemployed admiral
nor the half-pay captain had at that time, in his
enforced retirement at Bath or Cheltenham, taken
seriously to parliamenteering, company promoting,
or the concocting of pedigrees as a substitute for
walking the quarter-deck. His occupation was
indeed gone, but in its stead there had come to
him what he had rarely enjoyed whilst on the active
service list opportunity. Carried away by the
stimulus of so unprecedented a situation as that
afforded by the chance to make himself heard, he
rushed into print with projects and suggestions which
would have revolutionised the naval policy and
defence of the country at a stroke had they been
carried into effect. Or he devoted his leisure to
the invention of signal codes, semaphore systems,
embryo torpedoes, gun carriages, and what is more
to our point methods ostensibly calculated to man
the fleet in the easiest, least oppressive and most
expeditious manner possible for a free people.
Armed with these schemes, he bombarded the Ad-
miralty with all the pertinacity he had shown in
22 THE PRESS GANG
his quarter-deck days in applying for leave or
seeking promotion. Many, perhaps most, of the
inventions which it was thus sought to father upon
the Sea Lords, were happily never more heard of;
but here and there one, commending itself by its
seeming practicability, was selected for trial and
duly put to the test.
Fair to look upon while still in the air, these
fruits of leisured superannuation proved deceptively
unsound when plucked by the hand of experiment.
Registration, first adopted in 1696, held out un-
deniable advantages to the seaman. Under its
provisions he drew a yearly allowance when not
required at sea, and extra prize-money when on
active service. Yet the bait did not tempt him,
and the system was soon discarded as useless and
inoperative. Bounty, defined by some sentimentalist
as a "bribe to Neptune," for a while made a stronger
appeal ; but, ranging as it did from five to almost
any number of pounds under one hundred per head,
it proved a bribe indeed, and by putting an irresist-
ible premium on desertion threatened to decimate
the very ships it was intended to man. In 1795
what was commonly known as the Quota Scheme
superseded it. This was a plan of Pitt's devising,
under which each county contributed to the fleet
according to its population, the quota varying from
one thousand and eighty-one men for Yorkshire to
twenty-three for Rutland, whilst a minor Act levied
special toll on seaports, London leading the way with
five thousand seven hundred and four men. Like
its predecessor Bounty, however, this mode of re-
cruiting drained the Navy in order to feed it. Both
WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY 23
systems, moreover, possessed another and more
serious defect. When their initial enthusiasm had
cooled, the counties, perhaps from force of habit as
component parts of a country whose backbone was
trade, bought in the cheapest market. Hence the
Quota Man, consisting as he generally did of the
offscourings of the merchant service, was seldom
or never worth the money paid for him. An old
man-o'-war's-man, picking up a miserable specimen
of this class of recruit by the slack of his ragged
breeches, remarked to his grinning messmates as
he dangled the disreputable object before their
eyes: "'Ere's a lubber as cost a guinea a pound!"
He was not far out in his estimate.
As in the case of the good old method of re-
cruiting by beat of drum and the lure of the king's
shilling, system after system thus failed to draw into
its net, however speciously that net was spread,
either the class or the number of men whose services
it was desired to requisition. And whilst these
futilities were working out their own condemnation
the stormcloud of necessity grew bigger and bigger
on the national horizon. Let trade suffer as it
might, there was nothing for it but to discard all
new-fangled notions and to revert to the system
which the usage of ages had sanctioned. The
return was imperative. Failing what Junius stigma-
tised as the "spur of the Press," the right men in
the right numbers were not to be procured. The
wisdom of the nation was at fault. It could find
no other way.
There were, moreover, other reasons why the
press-gang was to the Navy an indispensable ap-
24 THE PRESS GANG
pendage reasons perhaps of little moment singly,
but of tremendous weight in the scale of naval
necessity when lumped together and taken in the
aggregate.
Of these the most prominent was that fatal flaw
in naval administration which Nelson was in the
habit of anathematising as the " Infernal System."
Due partly to lack of foresight and false economy
at Whitehall, partly to the character of the sailor
himself, it resolved itself into this, that whenever a
ship was paid off and put out of commission, all on
board of her, excepting only her captain and her
lieutenants, ceased to be officially connected with
the Navy. Now, as ships were for various reasons
constantly going out of commission, and as the
paying off of a first- second- or third-rate automati-
cally discharged from their country's employ a body
of men many hundreds in number, the "lowering"
effects of such a system, working year in, year out,
upon a fleet always in chronic difficulties for men,
may be more readily imagined than described.
To a certain limited extent the loss to the service
was minimised by a process called "turning over";
that is to say, the company of a ship paying off was
turned over bodily, or as nearly intact as it was
possible to preserve it, to another ship which at the
moment chanced to be ready, or making ready, for
sea. Or it might be that the commander of a ship
paying off, transferred to another ship fitting out,
carried the best men of his late command, com-
monly known as "old standers," along with him.
Unfortunately, the occasion of fitting out did not
always coincide with the occasion of paying off; and
WHY THE GANG WAS NECESSARY 25
although turnovers were frequently made by Ad-
miralty order, there were serious obstacles in the
way of their becoming general. Once the men were
paid off, the Admiralty had no further hold upon
them. By a stretch of authority they might, it is
true, be confined to quarters or on board a guard-
ship ; but if in these circumstances they rose in a
body and got ashore, they could neither be retaken
nor punished as deserters, but to use the good old
service term had to be "rose" again by means of the
press-gang. Turnovers, accordingly, depended mainly
upon two closely related circumstances : the good-
will of the men, and the popularity of commanders.
A captain who was notorious for his use of the lash
or the irons, or who was reputed unlucky, rarely if
ever got a turnover except by the adoption of the
most stringent measures. One who, on the other
hand, treated his men with common humanity, who
bested the enemy in fair fight and sent rich prizes
into port, never wanted for " followers," and rarely,
if ever, had recourse to the gang.^ Under such men
^ In his Autobiography Lord Dundonald asserts that he was only
once obliged to resort to pressing a statement so remarkable, con-
sidering the times he lived in, as to call for explanation. The occasion
was when, returning from a year's " exile in a tub," a converted collier
that " sailed like a hay-stack," he fitted out the Pallas at Portsmouth
and could obtain no volunteers. Setting his gangs to work, he got
together a scratch crew of the wretchedest description ; yet so mar-
vellous were the personality and disciplinary ability of the man, that
with only this unpromising material ready to his hand he intercepted
the Spanish trade off Cape Finisterre and captured four successive
prizes of very great value. The Pallas returned to Portsmouth with
"three large golden candlesticks, each about five feet high, placed
upon the mast-heads," and from that time onward Dundonald's reputa-
tion as a "lucky" commander was made. He never again had occasion
to invoke the aid of the gang.
26 THE PRESS GANG
the seaman would gladly serve "even in a dung
barge. "^ Unhappily for the service, such commanders
were comparatively few, and in their absence the
Infernal System drained the Navy of its best blood
and accentuated a hundred-fold the already over-
whelming need for the impress.
The old-time sailor,* again, was essentially a
creature of contradictions. Notorious for a " swear-
ing rogue," who punctuated his strange sea-lingo with
horrid oaths and appalling blasphemies, he made the
responses required by the services of his Church with
all the superstitious awe and tender piety of a child.
Inconspicuous for his thrift or " forehandedness," it
was nevertheless a common circumstance with him
to have hundreds of pounds, in pay and prize-money,
to his credit at his bankers, the Navy Pay-Office ;
and though during a voyage he earned his money as
hardly as a horse, and was as poor as a church mouse,
yet the moment he stepped ashore he made it fly by
the handful and squandered it, as the saying went,
like an ass. When he was sober, which was seldom
enough provided he could obtain drink, he possessed
scarcely a rag to his back ; but when he was drunk
he was himself the first to acknowledge that he had
"too many cloths in the wind." According to his
^ Ad. I. 2733 Capt. Young, 28 Sept. 1776.
The use of the word " sailor " was long regarded with disfavour
by the Navy Board, who saw in it only a colourless substitute for the
good old terms " seaman " and " mariner." Capt. Bertie, of the Ruby
gunship, once reported the pressing of a "sailor," Thomas Letting by
name, out of a collier in Yarmouth Roads, and was called upon by
My Lords to define the new-fangled term. This he did with admirable
circumlocution. " As for explaining the word ' sailor,' " said he, " I can
doe it no otherwise than (by) letting of you know that Thomas Letting
is a Sailor." .<4r'(',V>n Pi;i\
Nights, from the Hours oi Icui in ih.- ,\ir< .iioun !.
Sixths following Morning, nftci wliitli time the iiici
gciice ceafes.
1)1 riif" *
Members] of the Jerufalem Coffee-Houfe.
_ the THEATRE in North- Shields.
On MONDAY, November 24th, 1794.
Will b ptrformrd A ntw C O M K D Y. cjllrdllK:
, World in a Village:
TRIAL o/' FRIENDSHIP.
WnlUH h IhM iu/lj tdchralril AKlb'.r. \. 0'Ktt>. Esq.. mJ /rrfirritil fr,-.,.- ,..,
Si^bli Uf. Srafin il ibe Tbrjlrr Riyii:. a-.'cnl-C.jr.lgf, u-uh gtninil .l/fi^ialiiii.
loIWlxly. (an honed Millfr) Mr C A W I) K, r. I,.
Cingli", (Winc-incrcKam anj Bailwr) Mr 1' K I T C 11 A R I).
A-Hiut, ( oilimun Dtcwcr) Mr W A T T "^ r
Captiin Mullin.h.ick, (a St. Officer) Mr N K W ii O U N iX
0;.l Willow,, I Stcwird) Mr ' C O I. [. : K R.
Cipt-un \anUmlcn, (a D..tLl,;i!au) Mr W A K W \ C. ,..
Kd.rd Bdlevuc, Mili t: A W n E I. I .
f William BcMcvuf. Mr \V 11 K F. I. R P.
Old Soldier, Mr II U G G 1 N >.
Cl.irks, (alonur.atr_A,!vc:'.f..Kt) Mr r;i;AIIA_\;,
touifa, ' Mis <; O I. I. i K K. .
Mr, Albut, .Mis N . V.' U () U N IX , .
Maria Willow-,. Mi- M L C, C, IN?.
Margery Jollyboy, Mrs U 11 K r'. 1. E l(.
Mu Ucilouc,'.'- I..rd; :. I)^
v.iiHinp a Comic Song, lalltd _
I' Paddy Bull's yourney from Dublin to London, i
\ ' l.ndo! thcl'lay, MrrAWiJti.l, .. i;I lin,.. .1 Uin.icSor.s, cilcd T
lie Tippies of Ninety Four: I
^ T/je Golden Days we now PoJ/efs, Sir. i,
p' lirt.,rt Ihc Farct, Mrs 111 C ti 1 N R (l.v IX-iirc) wiil Tin; -^
? '^ Yes Kind Sir and I'll Thank you too." ' ]
f InJolAit 2d..l"i'icKir.<-, Mr WHF.KLKR will It.g Afc .;>/*/, favoi.ri.c 1
^ Hunting .Song, in Drd's and Clijr.ia7r. called ^ J
OLD TOWLER'.
:-, -hi ' w,iii.r.Hcd,A .a.-Vr.,-<.nA:', c, K,, ,:: ,! r,- y - i.
MIDNIGHT HOUR? J
Diamond Cut Diamonct.'^
:..',-, Mr (J ;: .\H A VI. y
r,rnculir,.ii<-.r.mjn. .\:, N t^ VV 15 O C X i,. , : w^
Nicl)ol,w, (tl-e i"'frajj-/w.
296 THE PRESS-GANG
to say that transported convicts had better treat-
ment.
Cooped up for weeks at a stretch in a space
invariably crowded to excess, deprived almost entirely
of light, exercise and fresh air, and poisoned with bad
water and what Roderick Random so truthfully called
the "noisome stench of the place," it is hardly
surprising that on protracted voyages from such
distant ports as Limerick or Leith the men should
have "fallen sick very fast."^ Officers were, indeed,
charged "to be very careful of the healths of the
seamen " entrusted to their keeping ; yet in spite of
this most salutary regulation, so hopelessly bad were
the conditions under which the men were habitually
carried, and so slight was the effort made to ameliorate
them, that few tenders reached their destination with-
out a more or less serious outbreak of fever, small-pox
or some other equally malignant distemper. Upon
the fleet the effect was appalling. Sickly tenders
could not but make sickly ships.
If the material atmosphere of the tender's hold
was bad, its moral atmosphere was unquestionably
worse. Dark deeds were done here at times, and
no man "peached" upon his fellows. Out of this
deplorable state of things a remarkable legal proceed-
ing once grew. Murder having been committed in
the night, and none coming forward to implicate the
offender, the coroner's jury, instead of returning their
verdict against some person or persons unknown,
found the entire occupants of the tender's hold,
seventy-two in number, guilty of that crime. A
^ Ad. I. 1444 Capt. Allen, 4 March 1771, and Captains' Letters,
passim.
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 297
warrant was actually issued for their apprehension,
though never executed. To put the men on their
trial was a useless step, since, in the circumstances,
they would have been most assuredly acquitted.^
Just as assuredly any informer in their midst would
have been murdered.
The scale of victualling on board the tenders was
supposed to be the same as on shore. " Full allowance
daily " was the rule ; and if the copper proved too
small to serve all at one boiling, there were to be as
many boilings as should be required to go round.
Unhappily for the pressed man, there was a weevil in
his daily bread. While it was the bounden duty of
the master of the vessel to feed him properly, and of
the officers to see that he was properly fed, " officers
and masters generally understood each other too well
in the pursery line." ^ Rations were consequently
short, boilings deficient, and though the cabin went well
content, the hold was the scene of bitter grumblings.
Nor were these the only disabilities the pressed
man laboured under. His officers proved a sore trial
to him. The Earl of Pembroke, Lord High Admiral,
foreseeing that this would be the case, directed that
he should be " used with all possible tenderness and
humanity." The order was little regarded. The
callosity of Smollett's midshipman, who spat in the
pressed man's face when he dared to complain of his
sufferings, and roughly bade him die for aught he
cared, was characteristic of the service. Hence a
later regulation, with grim irony, gave directions for
his burial. He was to be put out of the way, as soon
* Ad. 7. 300 Law Officers' Opinions, 1778-83, No, 20.
' Ad. I. 579 Admiral M'Bride, 19 March 1795.
298 THE PRESS GANG
as might be after the fatal conditions prevailing on
board His Majesty's tenders had done their work,
with as great a show of decency as could be extracted
from the sum of ten shillings.
Strictly speaking, it was not in the power of
the tender's officers to mitigate the hardships of the
pressed man's lot to any appreciable extent, let them be
as humane as they might. For this the pressed man
himself was largely to blame. An ungrateful rogue,
his hide was as impervious to kindness as a duck's
back to water. Supply him with slops ^ wherewith
to cover his nakedness or shield him from the cold,
and before the Sunday muster came round the
garments had vanished not into thin air, indeed,
but in tobacco and rum, for which forbidden luxuries
he invariably bartered them with the bumboat women
who had the run of the vessel while she remained in
harbour. Or allow him on deck to take the air and
such exercise as could be got there, and the moment
your back was turned he was away sans cong^. Few
of these runaways were as considerate as that Scotch
humorist, William Ramsay, who was pressed at Leith
for beating an informer and there put on board the
tender. Seizing the first opportunity of absconding,
" Sir," he wrote to the lieutenant in command, " I am
so much attached to you for the good usage I have
received at your hands, that I cannot think of ventur-
ing on board your ship again in the present state of
affairs. I therefore leave this letter at my father's
* The regulations stipulated that slops should be served out to all
who needed them ; but as their acceptance was held to set up a contract
between the recipient and the Crown, the pressed man was not un-
naturally averse from drawing upon such a source of supply as long as
any chance of escape remained to him.
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 299
to inform you that I intend to slip out of the
way."i
When that clever adventuress, Moll Flanders,
found herself booked for transportation beyond the
seas, her one desire, it will be recalled, was " to come
back before she went." So it was with the pressed
man. The idea of escape obsessed him escape
before he should be rated on shipboard and sent
away to heaven only knew what remote quarter of
the globe. It was for this reason that irons were so
frequently added to his comforts. " Safe bind, safe
find " was the golden rule on board His Majesty's
tenders.
How difficult it was for him to carry his cherished
design into execution, and yet how easy, is brought
home to us with surprising force by the catastrophe
that befell the Tasker tender. On the 23rd of May
1755 the Tasker sailed out of the Mersey with a full
cargo of pressed men designed for Spithead. She
possessed no press-room, and as the men for that
reason had the run of the hold, all hatches were
securely battened down with the exception of the
maindeck scuttle, an opening so small as to admit of
the passage of but one man at a time. Her crew
numbered thirty-eight, and elaborate precautions were
taken for the safe-keeping of her restless human
freight. So much is evident from the disposition of
her guard, which was as follows :
(a) At the open scuttle two sentries, armed with
pistol and cutlass. Orders, not to let too
many men up at once.
^ Ad. I. 1524. Capt. Brenton, 20 Oct. 1800.
300 THE PRESS-GANG
{d) On the forecastle two sentries, armed with
musket and bayonet. Orders, to fire on any
pressed man who should attempt to swim
away.
(c) On the poop one sentry, similarly armed, and
having similar orders.
(d) On the quarter-deck, at the entrance to the
great cabin, where the remaining arms were
kept, one sentry, armed with cutlass and
pistol. Orders, to let no pressed man come
upon the quarter-deck.
There were thus six armed sentinels stationed
about the ship ample to have nipped in the bud any
attempt to seize the vessel, but for two serious errors
of judgment on the part of the officer responsible for
their disposition. These were, first, the discretionary
power vested in the sentries at the scuttle ; and, second,
the inadequate guard, a solitary man, set for the
defence of the great cabin and the arms it contained.
Now let us see how these errors of judgment affected
the situation.
Either through stupidity, bribery or because they
were rapidly making an offing, the sentries at the
scuttle, as the day wore on, admitted a larger number
of pressed men to the comparative freedom of the
deck than was consistent with prudence. The number
eventually swelled to fourteen sturdy, determined
fellows, the pick of the hold. One of them,
having a fiddle, struck up a merry tune, the rest fell
to dancing, the tender's crew who were off duty
caught the infection and joined in, while the officers
stood looking on, tolerantly amused and wholly un-
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 301
suspicious of danger. Suddenly, just when the fun
was at its height, a splash was heard, a cry of " Man
overboard ! " ran from lip to lip, and officers and crew
rushed to the vessel's side. They were there, gazing
into the sea, for only a minute or two, but by the
time they turned their faces inboard again the fourteen
determined men were masters of the ship. In the
brief disciplinary interval they had overpowered the
guard and looted the cabin of its store of arms. That
night they carried the tender into Redwharf Bay
and there bade her adieu.^ To pursue them in so
mountainous a country would have been useless ; to
punish them, even had they been retaken, impossible.
As unrated men they were neither mutineers nor
deserters,^ and the seizure of the tender was at the
worst a bloodless crime in which no one was hurt save
an obdurate sentry, who was slashed over the head
with a cutlass.
The boldness of its inception and the anticlimaxical
nature of its finish invest another exploit of this
description with an interest all its own. This was the
cutting out of the Union tender from the river Tyne
on the 1 2th April 1777. The commander, Lieut.
Colville, having that day gone on shore for the
'^ Ad. I. 920 Admiral Sir Edward Hawke, 3 June 1755, and
enclosures.
'^ By 4 & 5 Anne, cap. 6, pressed men could be apprehended and
tried for desertion by virtue of the Queen's shilling having been forced
upon them at the time they were pressed, but as the use of that coin fell
into abeyance, so the Act in question became gradually a dead-letter.
Hay, Murray, Lloyd, Pinfold and Jervis, Law Ofificers of the Crown,
giving an opinion on this important point in 1756, held that "pressed
men are not subject to the Articles (of War) until they are actually rated
on board some of His Majesty's ships." Ad. 7. 299 Law Officers'
Opinions, 1756-77, No. 3, Case 2,
302 THE PRESS-GANG
" benefit of the air," and young Barker, the midship-
man who was left in charge in his absence, having
surreptitiously followed suit, the pressed men and
volunteers, to the number of about forty, taking
advantage of the opportunity thus presented, rose and
seized the vessel, loaded the great guns, and by dint
of threatening to sink any boat that should attempt to
board them kept all comers, including the commander
himself, at bay till nine o'clock in the evening. By
that time night had fallen, so, with the wind blowing
strong off-shore and an ebb-tide running, they cut the
cables and stood out to sea. For three days nothing
was heard of them, and North Shields, the scene of
the exploit and the home of most of the runaways, was
just on the point of giving the vessel up for lost when
news came that she was safe. Influenced by one
Benjamin Lamb, a pressed man of more than ordinary
character, the rest had relinquished their original
purpose of either crossing over to Holland or running
the vessel ashore on some unfrequented part of the
coast, and had instead carried her into Scarborough
Bay, doubtless hoping to land there without inter-
ference and so make their way to Whitby or Hull.
In this design, however, they were partly frustrated,
for, a force having been hastily organised for their
apprehension, they were waylaid as they came ashore
and retaken to the number of twenty-two, the rest
escaping. Lamb, discharged for his good offices in
saving the tender, was offered a boatswain's place if
he would re-enter ; but for poor Colville the affair
proved disastrous. Becoming demented, he attempted
to shoot himself and had to be superseded.^
* Ad. I. 1497 Capt. Bover, 13 April 1777, and enclosures.
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 303
All down through the century similar incidents,
crowding thick and fast one upon another, relieved
the humdrum routine of the pressed man's passage
to the fleet, and either made his miserable life in
a measure worth living or brought it to a summary
conclusion. Of minor incidents, all tending to the
same happy or unhappy end, there was no lack.
Now he sweltered beneath a sun so hot as to
cause the pitch to boil in the seams of the deck
above his head; again, as when the Boneta sloop,
conveying pressed men from Liverpool to the
Hamoaze in 1740, encountered " Bedds of two or
three Acres bigg of Ice & of five or Six foot
thicknesse, which struck her with such force 'twas
enough to drive her bows well out," he " almost
perished " from cold.^ To-day it was broad farce.
He held his sides with laughter to see the lieutenant
of the tender he was in, mad with rage and drink,
chase the steward round and round the mainmast
with a loaded pistol, whilst the terrified hands, fearing
for their lives, fled for refuge to the coalhole, the
roundtops and the shore.^ To-morrow it was tragedy.
Some " little dirty privateer " swooped down upon
him, as in the case of the Admiral Spry tender from
Waterford to Plymouth,^ and consigned him to what
he dreaded infinitely more than any man-o'-war a
French prison ; or contrary winds, swelling into a
sudden gale, drove him a helpless wreck on to some
treacherous coast, as they drove the Rich Charlotte
^ Ad. I. 2732 Capt. Young, 8 Feb. 1739-40.
^ Ad. I. 1498 Complaint of the Master and Company of H.M.
Hired Tender Speedwell^ 21 Dec. 1778.
' Ad. I. 1500 Dickson, Surveyor of Customs at the Cove of Cork,
30 April 1780.
304 THE PRESS-GANG
upon the Formby Sands in 1745/ and there remorse-
lessly drowned him.
Provided he escaped such untoward accidents as
death or capture by the enemy, sooner or later the
pressed man arrived at the receiving station. Here
another ordeal awaited him, and here also he made
his last bid for freedom.
Taking the form of a final survey or regulating,
the ordeal the pressed man had now to face was
no less thoroughgoing than its precursor at the
rendezvous had in all probability been superficial
and ineffective. Eyes saw deeper here, wits were
sharper, and in this lay at once the pressed man's
bane and salvation. For if genuinely unfit, the fact
was speedily demonstrated ; whereas if merely sham-
ming, discovery overtook him with a certainty that
wrote "finis" to his last hope. Nevertheless, for this
ordeal, as for his earlier regulating at the rendezvous,
the sailor who knew his book prepared himself with
exacting care during the tedium of his voyage.
No sooner was he mustered for survey, then,
than the most extraordinary, impudent and in many
instances transparent impostures were sprung upon
his examiners. Deafness prevailed to an alarming
extent, dumbness was by no means unknown. Men
who fought desperately when the gang took them, or
who played cards with great assiduity in the tender's
hold, developed sudden paralysis of the arms.^ Legs
which had been soundness itself at the rendezvous
^ Ad. I. 1440 Capt. Amherst, 4 Oct. 1745.
' Ad. I. 1464 Capt. Bloyes, Jan. 1702-3 ; Ad. i. 1470 Capt.
Bennett, 26 Sept. 171 1. An extraordinary instance of this form of
malingering is cited in the " Naval Sketch -Book," 1826.
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 305
were now a putrefying mass of sores. The itch broke
out again, virulent and from all accounts incurable.
Fits returned with redoubled frequency and violence,
the sane became demented or idiotic, and the most
obviously British, losing the use of their mother
tongue, swore with many gesticulatory sacr^s that
they had no English, as indeed they had none for
naval purposes. Looking at the miserable, disease-
ridden crew, the uninitiated spectator was moved to
tears of pity. Not so the naval officer. In France,
when a prisoner of war, learning French there with-
out a master, he had heard a saying that he now
recalled to some purpose : Vin de grain est plus doux
que nest pas vin de presse "Willing duties are
sweeter than those that are extorted." The punning
allusion to the press had tickled his fancy and fixed
the significant truism in his memory. From it he
now took his cue and proceeded to man his ship.
So at length the pressed man, in spite of all his
ruses and protestations, was rated and absorbed into
that vast agglomeration of men and ships known as
the fleet. Here he underwent a speedy metamor-
phosis. It was not that he lost his individuality and
became a mere unit amongst thousands. Quite the
contrary. Friends, creditors or next-of-kin, concoct-
ing petitions on his behalf, set forth in heart-rending
terms the many disabilities he suffered from, together
with many he did not, and prayed, with a fervour
often reaching no deeper than their pockets, that
he might be restored without delay to his bereaved
and destitute family. Across the bottom right-hand
corner of these petitions, conveniently upturned for
that purpose, the Admiralty scrawled its initial order :
306 THE PRESS GANG
" Let his case be stated." The immediate effect of
this expenditure of Admiralty ink was magical. It
promoted the subject of the petition from the ranks,
so to speak, and raised him to the dignity of a
' State the Case Man."
He now became a person of consequence. The
kindliest inquiries were made after his health. The
state of his eyes, the state of his limbs, the state of
his digestion were all stated with the utmost minute-
ness and prolixity. Reams of gilt-edged paper were
squandered upon him ; and by the time his case had
been duly stated, restated, considered, reconsidered
and finally decided, the poor fellow had perhaps voy-
aged round the world or by some mischance gone to
the next.
In the matter of exacting their pound of flesh
the Lords Commissioners were veritable Shylocks.
Neither supplications nor tears had power to move
them, and though they sometimes relented, it was
invariably for reasons of policy and in the best
interests of the service. Men clearly shown to be
protected they released. They could not go back
upon their word unless some lucky quibble rendered
it possible to traverse the obligation with honour.
Unprotected subjects who were clearly unfit to eat
the king's victuals they discharged for substitutes.
The principle underlying their Lordships' gracious
acceptance of substitutes for pressed men was beauti-
fully simple. If as a pressed man you were fit to
serve, but unwilling, you were worth at least two
able-bodied men ; if you were unfit, and hence unable
to serve, you were worth at least one. This simple
rule proved a source of great encouragement to the
Thk Prkss-Gang, or English Liberty displayed.
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 307
gangs, for however bad a man might be he was
always worth a better.
The extortions to which the Lords Commissioners
lent themselves in this connection three, and, as in
the case of Joseph Sanders of Bristol,^ even four
able-bodied men being exacted as substitutes could
only be termed iniquitous did we not know the dupli-
city, roguery and deep cunning with which they had
to cope. Upon the poor, indeed, the practice en-
tailed great hardship, particularly when the home
had to be sacrificed in order to obtain the discharge
of the bread-winner who had been instrumental in
getting it together ; but to the unscrupulous crimp
and the shady attorney the sailor's misfortune
brought only gain. Buying up " raw boys," or Irish-
men who " came over for reasons they did not wish
known " rascally persons who could be had for a
song they substituted these for seasoned men who
had been pressed, and immediately, having got the
latter in their power, turned them over to merchant
ships at a handsome profit. At Hull, on the other
hand, substitutes were sought in open market. The
bell-man there cried a reward for men to go in that
capacity.^
Even when the pressed man had procured his
substitutes and obtained his coveted discharge, his
liberty was far from assured. In theory exempt
from the press for a period of at least twelve months,
he was in reality not only liable to be re-pressed at
any moment, but to be subjected to that process as
often as he chose to free himself and the gang to
^ Ad. I. 1534 Capt. Barker, 4 Jan. 1805, and endorsement.
* Ad. I. 1439 George Crowle, Esq., M.P. for Hull, 28 Dec. 1739.
308 THE PRESS GANG
take him. A Liverpool youth named William Crick
a lad with expectations to the amount of '* near
;^4000," was in this way pressed and discharged by
substitute three times in quick succession.^ Intend-
ing substitutes themselves not infrequently suffered
the same fate ere they could carry out their intention."
The discharging of a pressed man whose petition
finally succeeded did not always prove to be the
eminently simple matter it would seem. Time and
tide waited for no man, least of all for the man who
had the misfortune to be pressed, and in the interval
between his appeal and the order for his release his
ship, as already hinted, had perhaps put half the
circumference of the globe between him and home ;
or when the crucial moment arrived, and he was
summoned before his commander to learn the gratify-
ing Admiralty decision, he made his salute in
batches of two, three or even four men, each of
whom protested vehemently that he was the original
and only person to whom the order applied. An
amusing attempt at " coming Cripplegate " in this
manner occurred on board the Lennox in 171 1. A
woman, who gave her name as Alice Williams,
having petitioned for the release of her "brother,"
one John Williams, a pressed man then on board that
ship, succeeded in her petition, and orders were sent
down to the commander, Capt. Bennett, to give the
man his discharge. He proceeded to do so, but to his
amazement discovered, first, that he had no less than
four John Williamses on board, all pressed men ;
* Ad. I. 579 Rear-Admiral Child, 8 Aug. 1799.
' Ad. I. 1439 Lieut. Leaver, 5 Jan. 1739-40, and numerous in-
stances.
IN THE CLUTCH OF THE GANG 309
second, that while each of the four claimed to be the
man in question, three of the number had no sister,
while the fourth confessed to one whose name was
not Alice but " Percilly " ; and, after long and patient
investigation, third, that one of them had a wife
named Alice, who, he being a foreigner domiciled by-
marriage, had " tould him she would gett him cleare"
should he chance to fall into the hands of the press-
gang. In this she failed, for he was kept.^
Of the pressed man's smiling arrest for debts which
he did not owe, and of his jocular seizure by sheriffs
armed with writs of Habeas Corpus, the annals of his
incorporation in the fleet furnish many instances.
Arrest for fictitious debt was specially common. In
every seaport town attorneys were to be found who
made it their regular practice. Particularly was this
true of Bristol. Good seamen were rarely pressed
there for whom writs were not immediately issued on
the score of debts of which they had never heard.^
To warrant such arrest the debt had to exceed twenty
pounds, and service, when the pressed man was
already on shipboard, was by the hands of the Water
Bailiff.
The writ of Habeas Corpus was, in effect, the only
legal check it was possible to oppose to the impudent
pretensions and high-handed proceedings of the gang.
While H.M.S. Amaranth lay in dock in 1804 and
her company were temporarily quartered on a hulk in
Long Reach, two sheriff's officers, accompanied by a
man named Cumberland, a tailor of Deptford, boarded
the latter and served a writ on a seaman for debt.
^ Ad. I. 1470 Capt. Bennett, 2 Dec. 171 1.
* Ad. I. 579 Admiral Philip, 5 Dec. 1801.
310 THE PRESS-GANG
The first lieutenant, who was in charge at the time,
refused to let the man go, saying he would first send
to his captain, then at the dock, for orders, which he
accordingly did. The intruders thereupon went over
the side, Cumberland " speaking very insultingly."
Just as the messenger returned with the captain's
answer, however, they again put in an appearance,
and the lieutenant hailed them and bade them come
aboard. Cumberland complied. " I have orders from
my captain," said the lieutenant, stepping up to him,
" to press you." He did so, and had it not been that
a writ of Habeas Corpus was immediately sworn out,
the Deptford tailor would most certainly have ex-
changed his needle for a marlinespike.^
Provocative as such redemptive measures were,
and designedly so, they were as a rule allowed to pass
unchallenged. The Lords Commissioners regretted
the loss of the men, but thought " perhaps it would be
as well to let them go."* For this complacent attitude
on the part of his captors the pressed man had reason
to hold the Law Officers of the Crown in grateful
remembrance. As early as 1755 ^^^7 gave it as their
opinion too little heeded that to bring any matter
connected with pressing to judicial trial would be
"very imprudent." Later, with the lesson of twenty-two
years' hard pressing before their eyes, they went still
further, for they then advised that a subject so conten-
tious, not to say so ill-defined in law, should be kept, if
not altogether, at least as much as possible out of court.^
^ Ad. I. 1532 Lieut. Collett, 13 Feb. 1804.
Ad. 7. 302 Law Officers' Opinions, 1783-95, No. 24.
Ad. 7. 298 Law Officers' Opinions, 1733-56, No. 99 ; Ad. 7. 299
Law Officers' Opinions, 1756-77, No. 70.
CHAPTER XII
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT
Not until the year 1833 did belated Nemesis overtake
the press-gang. It died the unmourned victim of its
own enormities, and the manner of its passing forms
the by no means least interesting chapter in its extra-
ordinary career.
Summarising the causes, direct and indirect, which
led to the final scrapping of an engine that had been
mainly instrumental in manning the fleet for a hundred
years and more, and without which, whatever its im-
perfections, that fleet could in all human probability
never have been manned at all, we find them to be
substantially these :
(a) The demoralising effects of long-continued,
violent and indiscriminate pressing upon the
Fleet ;
(d) Its injurious and exasperating effects upon
Trade ;
(c) Its antagonising effect upon the Nation ; and
(d) Its enormous cost as compared with recruiting
by the good-will of the People.
Frederick the Great, it is related, being in one of
his grim humours after the dearly bought victory of
312 THE PRESS GANG
Czaslaw, invited the neighbouring peasantry to come
and share the spoil of the carcases on the field of
battle. /They responded in great numbers ; whereupon
he, surrounding them, pressed three hundred of the
most promising and " cloathed them immediately from
the dead." ^ In this way, Ezekiel-like, he retrieved
his losses ; but to the regiments so completed the
addition of these resurrection recruits proved demoral-
ising to a degree, notwithstanding the Draconic
nature of the Prussian discipline. In like manner the
discipline used in the British fleet, while not less
drastic, failed conspicuously to counteract the dry-rot
introduced and fostered by the press-gang. In its
efforts to maintain the Navy, indeed, that agency came
near to proving its ruin.
On the most lenient survey of the recruits it
furnished, it cannot be denied that they were in the
aggregate a desperately poor lot, unfitted both
physically and morally for the tremendous task of
protecting an island people from the attacks of power-
ful sea-going rivals. How bad they were, the
epithets spontaneously applied to them by the out-
raged commanders upon whom they were foisted
abundantly prove. Witness the following, taken at
random from naval captains' letters extending over
a hundred years :
" Blackguards."
" Sorry poor creatures that don't earn half the
victuals they eat."
" Sad, thievish creatures."
* State Papers Foreign^ Germany^ vol. ccacL Robinson to Hyndford,
31 May 1742.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 313
" Not a rag left but what was of such a nature as
had to be destroyed."
" 150 on board, the greatest part of them sorry
fellows."
" Poor ragged souls, and very small."
" Miserable poor creatures, not a seaman amongst
them, and the fleet in the same condition."
" Unfit for service, and a nuisance to the ship."
*' Never so ill-manned a ship since I have been
at sea. The worst set I ever saw."
" Twenty-six poor souls, but three of them sea-
men. Ragged and half dead."
" Landsmen, boys, incurables and cripples. Sad
wretches great part of them are."
" More fit for an hospital than the sea."
"All the ragg-tagg that can be picked up."
In this last phrase, "All the rag-tag that can be
picked up," we have the key to the situation ; for
though orders to press "no aged, diseased or infirm
persons, nor boys," were sufficiently explicit, yet in
order to swell the returns, and to appease in some
degree the fleet's insatiable greed for men, the gangs
raked in recruits with a lack of discrimination that for
the better part of a century made that fleet the most
gigantic collection of human freaks and derelicts under
the sun.
Billingsley, commander of the Ferme, receiving
seventy pressed men to complete his complement in
1708, discovers to his chagrin that thirteen are lame
in the legs, five lame in the hands, and three almost
blind. ^ Latham, commanding the Bristol, on the
* Ad. I. 1469 Capt. Billingsley, 5 May 1708.
314 THE PRESS GANG
eve of sailing for the West Indies can muster only
eighteen seamen amongst sixty-eight pressed men
that day put on board of him. As for the rest, they
are either sick, or too old or too young to be of
service " ragged wretches, bad of the itch, who have
not the least pretensions to eat His Majesty's bread."
Forty of the number had to be put ashore.^ Admiral
Mostyn, boarding his flagship, the Monarch, "never
in his life saw such a crew," though the Monarch had
an already sufficiently evil reputation in that respect,
insomuch that whenever a scarecrow man-o'-war's
man was seen ashore the derisive cry instantly went
up : " There goes a Monarch \ " So hopelessly bad
was the company in this instance, it was found
impossible to carry the ship to sea. " I don't know
where they come from," observes the Admiral, hot
with indignation, " but whoever was the officer who
received them, he ought to be ashamed, for I never
saw such except in the condemned hole at Newgate.
I was three hours and a half mustering this scabby
crew, and I should have imagined that the Scum of
the Earth had been picked up for this ship."^ The
vigorous protest prepares us for what Capt. Baird
found on board the Duke a few years later. The
pressed men there exhibited such qualifications for
sea duty as "fractured thigh-bone, idiocy, strained
back and sickly, a discharged soldier, gout and sixty
years old, rupture, deaf and foolish, fits, lame,
rheumatic and incontinence of urine."'
That most reprehensible practice, the pressing of
"^ Ad. I. i6i Admiral Watson, 26 Feb. 1754.
2 Ad. I. 480 Admiral Mostyn, i and 6 April 1755.
' Ad. I. 1490 Capt. Baird, 22 May 1759.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 315
cripples for naval purposes, would appear to have had
its origin in the unauthorised extension of an order
issued by the Lord High Admiral, in 1704, to the
effect that in the appointment of cooks to the Navy
the Board should give preference to persons so
afflicted. For the pressing of boys there existed
even less warrant. Yet the practice was common,
so much so that when, during the great famine of
1800, large numbers of youths flocked into Poole in
search of the bread they could not obtain in the
country, the gangs waylaid them and reaped a rich
harvest. Two hundred was the toll on this occasion.
As all were in a "very starving, ragged, filthy
condition," the gangsmen stripped them, washed
them thoroughly in the sea, clad them in second-hand
clothing from the quay-side shops, and giving each
one a knife, a spoon, a comb and a bit of soap, sent
them on board the tenders contented and happy. ^
These lads were of course a cut above the "scum of
the earth " so vigorously denounced by Admiral
Mostyn. Beginning their career as powder-monkeys,
a few years' licking into shape transformed them, as
a rule, into splendid fighting material.
The utter incapacity of the human refuse dumped
into the fleet is justly stigmatised by one indignant
commander, himself a patient long-sufferer in that
respect, as a "scandalous abuse of the service." Six
of these poor wretches had not the strength of one
man. They could not be got upon deck in the night,
or if by dint of the rope's-end they were at length
routed out of their hammocks, they immediately
developed the worst symptoms of the "waister"
^ Ad. I. 579 Capt. Boyle, 2 June 1801.
316 THE PRESS GANG
seasickness and fear of that which is high.* Bruce,
encountering dirty weather on the Irish coast, when
in command of the Hawke, out of thirty-two pressed
men "could not get above seven to go upon a yard
to reef his courses," but was obliged to order his
warrant officers and master aloft on that duty.'
Belitha, of the Scipio, had but one man aboard him,
out of a crew of forty-one, who was competent to
stand his trick at the wheel ;' Bethell, of the Phoenix^
had many who had " never seen a gun fired in their
lives " ; * and Adams, of the Bird-in-kand, learnt the
fallacy of the assertion that that raia avis is worth
two in the bush. Mustered for drill in small-arms,
his men " knew no more how to handle them than
a child." ^ For all their knowledge of that useful
exercise they might have been Sea-Fencibles.
Yet while ships were again and again prevented
from putting to sea because, though their complements
were numerically complete, they had only one or no
seaman on board, and hence were unable to get their
anchors or make sail ; while Bennett, of the Lennox,
when applied to by the masters of eight outward-
bound East-India ships for the loan of two hundred
and fifty men to enable thenj^to engage the French
privateers by whom they were held up in the river
of Shannon, dared not lend a single hand lest the
pressed men, who formed the greater part of his crew,
^ Ad. I. 1 47 1 Capt. Billop, 26 Oct. 1712.
* Ad. I. 1477 Capt. Bruce, 6 Oct. 1741.
" Ad. I. 1482 Capt. Belitha, 15 July 1746.
* Ad. I. 1490 Capt. Bethell, 21 Aug. 1759.
* Ad. I. 1440 Capt. Adams, 7 Oct. 1744.
^ Ad. I. 1478 Capt. Boys, 14 April 1742; Ad. i. 1512 Capt.
Bayly, 21 July 1796, and Captains' Letters, /ajj/w.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 317
should rise and run away with the ship ; ^ Ambrose,
of the Rupert, cruising off Cape Machichaco with
a crew of "miserable poor wretches" whom he feared
could be of " no manner of use or service " to him,
after a short but sharp engagement of only an hour's
duration captured, with the loss of but a single man,
the largest privateer sailing out of San Sebastian
the Duke of Vandome, of twenty-six carriage guns
and two hundred and two men, of whom twenty-nine
were killed;^ and Capt. Amherst, encountering a
heavy gale in Barnstable Pool, off Appledore, would
have lost his ship, the low-waisted, over-masted
Mortar sloop, had it not been for the nine men he
was so lucky as to impress shortly before the gale.*
Anson regarded pressed men with suspicion. When
he sailed on his famous voyage round the world his
ships contained only sixty-seven ; but with his
complement of five hundred reduced by sickness to
two hundred and one, he was glad to add forty of
those undesirables to their number out of the India-
men at Wampoo.* These, however, were seamen
such as the gangs did not often pick up in England,
where, as we have seen, the able seaman who was
not fully protected avoided the press as he would
a lee shore.
In addition to the sweepings of the roads and
slums, there were in His Majesty's ships many who
trod the decks "wide betwixt the legs, as if they had
the gyves on." Peculiar to the seafaring man, the
^ Ad. I. 1499 Capt. Bennett, 22 Sept. 1779.
' Ad. I. 1439 Capt. Ambrose, 7 July and 26 Sept. 1741.
' Ad. I. 1440 Capt. Amherst, 12 Dec. 1744.
Ad. I. 1439 Capt. Anson, 18 Sept. 1740, and 7 Dec. 1742.
318 THE PRESS-GANG
tailor and the huckstering Jew, the gait of these
individuals, who belonged mostly to the sailor class,
was strongly accentuated by an adventitious circum-
stance having no necessary connection with Israelitish
descent, the sartorial board or the rolling deep.
They were in fact convicts who had but recently
shed their irons, and who walked wide from force
of habit. Reasons of policy rather than of mercy
explained their presence in the fleet. The prisons
of the country, numerous and insanitary though they
were, could neither hold them all nor kill them ;
America would have no more of them ; and penal
settlements, those later garden cities of a harassed
government, were as yet undreamt of In these
circumstances reprieved and pardoned convicts were
bestowed in about equal proportions, according to
their calling and election, upon the army and the navy.
The practice was one of very respectable antiquity
and antecedents. By a certain provision of the
Feudal System a freeman who had committed a
felony, or become hopelessly involved in debt, might
purge himself of either by becoming a serf. So, at
a later date, persons in the like predicament were
permitted to exchange their fetters, whether of debt
or iron, for the dear privilege of "spilling every drop
of blood in their bodies " ^ on behalf of the sovereign
whose clemency they enjoyed. Broken on the wheel
of naval discipline, they " did very well in deep
water." Nearer land they were given, like the jail-
birds they were, to "hopping the twig."*
^ Ad. I. 5125 Petition of the Convicts on board the Stanislaus
hulk, Woolwich, 18 May 1797.
' Ad. 1. 2733 Capt. Young, 21 March 1776.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 319
The insolvent debtor, who in the majority of cases
had studied his pleasures more than his constitution,
was perhaps an even less desirable recruit than his
cousin the e;nancipated convict. In his letters to the
Navy Board, Capt. Aston, R.N., relates how, im-
mediately after the passing of the later Act ^ for the
freeing of such persons from their financial fetters, he
" gave constant attendance for almost two years at
the sittings of the Courts of Sessions in London and
Surrey," lying in wait there for such debtors as should
choose the sea. From the Queen's Bench Prison,
the Clink, Marshalsea, Borough Compter, Poultry
Compter, Wood Street Compter, Ludgate Prison
and the Fleet, he obtained in that time a total of
one hundred and thirty-two, to whom in every case
the prest-shilling was paid. They were dear at the
price. Bankrupt in pocket, stamina and health, they
cumbered the ships to the despair of commanders and
were never so welcome as when they ran away.^
The responsibility for jail-bird recruiting did not
of course rest with the gangs. They saw the shady
crew safe on board ship, that was all, Yet the odium
of the thing was theirs. For not only did association
with criminals lower the standard of pressing as the
gangs practised it, it heightened the general disrepute
in which they were held. For an institution whose
hold upon the affections of the people was at the bes*
positively negative, this was a serious matter. Every
convict whom the gang safeguarded consequently
drove another nail in the coffin preparing for it.
The first and most lasting effect of the wholesale
^ 4 & 5 Anne, cap. 6.
* Ad. I. 1436 Letters of CapL Aston, 1704-5.
320 THE PRESS-GANG
pumping of sewage into the fleet was to taint the
ships with a taint far more deadly than mere inepti-
tude. A spirit of ominous restlessness prevailed.
Slackness was everywhere observable, coupled with
incipient insubordination which no discipline, how-
ever severe, could eradicate or correct. At critical
moments the men could with difficulty be held to
their duty. To hold them to quarters in '97, when
engaging the enemy off Brest, the rattan and the
rope's-end had to be unsparingly used.^ In no
circumstances were they to be trusted. Given the
slightest opening, they " ran " like water from a
sieve. To counteract these dangerous tendencies the
Marines were instituted. Drafted into the ships in
thousands, they checked in a measure the surface
symptoms of disaffection, but left the disease itself
untouched. The fact was generally recognised, and
it was no uncommon circumstance, when the number
of pressed men present in a ship was large in propor-
tion to the unpressed element, for both officers and
marines to walk the deck day and night armed,
fearful lest worse things should come upon them.'
What they anticipated was the mutiny of individual
crews. But a greater calamity than this was in store
for them.
In the wholesale mutinies at Spithead and the
Nore the blow fell with appalling suddenness, not-
withstanding the fact that in one form or another it
had been long foreseen. Fifty-five years had elapsed
since Vernon, scenting danger from the existing mode
* Ad. I. 5125 Petition of the Company of H.M.S. Nymph, 1797.
' Ad. I. 1499 Capt. Bennett, 22 Sept. 1799, and Captains' Letters,
passim.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 321
of manning the fleet, had first sounded the alarm.
He dreaded, he told the Lords Commissioners in so
many words, the consequences that must sooner or
later ensue from adherence to the press.^ Though
the utterance of one gifted with singularly clear
prevision, the warning passed unheeded. Had it
been made public, it would doubtless have met with
the derision with which the voice of the national
prophet is always hailed. Veiled as it was in service
privacy, it moved their Lordships to neither comment
nor action. Action, indeed, was out of the question.
The Commissioners were helpless in the grip of a
system from which, so far as human sagacity could
then perceive, there was no way of escape. Let its
issue be what it might, they could no more replace
or reconstruct it than they could build ships of
tinsel.
Other warnings were not wanting. For some
years before the catastrophic happenings of '97 there
flowed in upon the Admiralty a thin but steady stream
of petitions from the seamen of the fleet, each of them
a rude echo of Vernon's sapient warning. To these,
coming as they did from an unconsidered source,
little if any significance was attached. Beyond the
most perfunctory inquiry, in no case to be made
public, they received scant attention. The sailor, it
was thought, must have his grievances if he would
be happy ; and petitions were the recognised line for
him to air them on. They were accordingly relegated
to that limbo of distasteful and quickly forgotten things,
their Lordships' pigeon-holes.
Yet there was amongst these documents at least
^ Ad. I. 578 Vice-Adrairal Vernon, 27 Jan. 1742-3.
21
322 THE PRESS-GANG
one which should have given the Heads of the Navy
pause for serious thought. It was the petition of the
seamen of H.M.S. Shannon,^ in which there was
conveyed a threat that afterwards, when the mutiny
at the Nore was at its height, under the leadership
of a pressed man whose coadjutors were mainly
pressed men, came within an ace of resolving itself
in action. That threat concerned the desperate
expedient of carrying the revolted ships into an
enemy's port, and of there delivering them up.
Had this been done and only the Providence that
watches over the destinies of nations prevented it
the act would have brought England to her knees.
At a time like this, when England's worst enemies
were emphatically the press-gangs which manned her
fleet with the riff-raff of the nation and thus made
national disaster not only possible but hourly imminent,
the "old stander " and the volunteer were to her
Navy what salt is to the sea, its perpetual salvation.
Such men inculcated an example, created an esprit
de corps, that infected even the vagrant and the jail-
bird, to say nothing of the better-class seaman, taken
mainly by gangs operating on the water, who was
often content, when brought into contact with loyal
men, to settle down and do his best for king and
country. Amongst the pressed men, again, desertion
and death made for the survival of the fittest, and in
this residuum there was not wanting a certain savour.
Subdued and quickened by man-o'-war discipline,
they developed a dogged resolution, a super-capacity
not altogether incompatible with degeneracy ; and to
^ Ad. I. 5125 Petition of the Ship's Company of the Shannon^
16 June 1796.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 323
crown all, the men who officered the resolute if
disreputable crew were men in whose blood the salt
of centuries tingled, men unrivalled for sea-sagacity,
initiative and pluck. If they could not uphold the
honour of the flag with the pressed man's unqualified
aid, they did what was immeasurably greater. They
upheld it in spite of him.
Upon the trade of the nation the injury inflicted
by the press-gang is rightly summed up in littles.
Every able seaman, every callow apprentice taken
out of or forcibly detained from a merchant vessel
was, ipso facto, a minute yet irretrievably substantial
loss to commerce of one kind or another. Trade, it
is true, did not succumb in consequence. Possessed
of marvellous recuperative powers, she did not even
languish to any perceptible degree. Nevertheless,
the detriment was there, a steadily cumulative factor,
and at the end of any given period of pressing the
commerce of the nation, emasculated by these con-
tinuous if infinitesimal abstractions from its vitality,
was substantially less in bulk, substantially less in
pounds sterling, than if it had been allowed to run its
course unhindered.
British in name, but Teutonic in its resentments,
trade came to regard these continual "pin-pricks" as
an intolerable nuisance. It was not so much the loss
that aroused her anger as the constant irritation she
was subjected to. This she keenly resented, and the
stream of her resentment, joining forces with its
confluents the demoralisation of the Navy through
pressing, the excessive cost of pressing and the
antagonising effects of pressing upon the nation at
large, contributed in no small degree to that final
324 THE PRESS GANG
supersession of the press-gang which was in essence,
if not in name, the beginning of Free Trade.
To the people the impress was as an axe laid at
the root of the tree. There was here no question, as
with trade, of the mere loss of hands who could be
replaced. Attacking the family in the person of its
natural supporter and protector, the octopus system
of which the gangs were the tentacles struck at the
very foundations of domestic life and brought to
thousands of households a poverty as bitter and a
grief as poignant as death.
If the people were slow to anger under the
infliction it was because, in the first place, the gang
had its advocates who, though they could not extol
its virtues, since it had none, were yet able, and that
with no small measure of success, to demonstrate to
a people as insular in their prejudices as in their
habitat that, but for the invincible Navy which the
gang maintained for their protection, the hereditary
enemy, the detested French, would most surely come
and compel them one and all to subsist upon a diet
of frogs. What could be seriously urged against the
gang in face of an argument such as that ?
Patriotism, moreover, glowed with ardent flame.
Fanned to twofold heat by natural hatred of the
foreigner and his insolent challenge of insular supe-
riority, it blinded the people to the truth that liberty of
the subject is in reality nothing more than freedom
from oppression. So, with the gang at their very
doors, waiting to snatch away their husbands, their
fathers and their sons, they carolled " Rule Britannia"
and congratulated themselves on being a free people.
The situation was unparalleled in its sardonic humour ;
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 325
and, as if this were not enough, the " Noodle of
Newcastle," perceiving vacuously that something was
still wanting, supplied the bathetic touch by giving
out that the king, God bless him ! could never prevail
upon himself to break through the sacred liberties of
his people save on the most urgent occasions.^
The process of correcting the defective vision of
the nation was as gradual as the acquisition of the
sea-power the nation had set as its goal, and as
painful. In both processes the gang participated
largely. To the fleet it acted as a rude feeder ; to
the people as a ruder specialist. Wielding the cut-
lass as its instrument, it slowly and painfully hewed
away the scales from their eyes until it stood
visualised for what it really was the most atrocious
agent of oppression the world has ever seen. For
the operation the people should have been grateful.
The nature of the thing they had cherished so blindly
filled them with rage and incited them to violence.
Two events now occurred to seal the fate of the
gang and render its final supersession a mere matter
of time rather than of debate or uncertainty. The
mutiny at the Nore brought the people face to face
with the appalling risks attendant on wholesale
pressing, while the war with America, incurred for
the sole purpose of upholding the right to press,
taught them the lengths to which their rulers were
still prepared to go in order to enslave them. In
the former case their sympathies, though with the
mutineers, were frozen at the fountain-head by fear of
invasion and that supposititious diet of frogs. In the
latter, as in the ancient quarrel between Admiralty
1 Newcastle Papers Newcastle to Yorke, 27 Feb. 1749-50.
326 THE PRESS-GANG
and Trade, they went out to the party who not
only abstained from pressing but paid the higher
wages.
While the average cost of 'listing a man "volun-
teerly " rarely exceeded the modest sum of 30s., the
expense entailed through recruiting him by means of
the press-gang ranged from 3s. 9d. per head in 1570*
tO;^ii4 in 1756. Between these extremes his cost
fluctuated in the most extraordinary manner. At
Weymouth, in 1762, it was at least ;^icxd ; at Deal,
in 1805, ;^32 odd; at Poole, in the same year, ;^8o.*
From 1756 the average steadily declined until in
1795 it touched its eighteenth century minimum of
about ;^6.^ A sharp upward tendency then developed,
and in the short space of eight years it soared again
to ;^20. It was at this figure that Nelson, perhaps
the greatest naval authority of his time, put it in
1803.*
Up to this point we have considered only the
prime cost of the pressed man. A secondary factor
must now be introduced, for when you had got your
man at an initial cost of ;^20 a cost in itself out of
all proportion to his value you could never be sure
of keeping him. Nelson calculated that during the war
immediately preceding 1803 forty-two thousand sea-
men deserted from the fleet.* Assuming, with him,
that every man of this enormous total was either a
* State Papers Domestic^ Elizabeth, vol. Ixxiii. f. 38 : Estimate of
Charge for Pressing 400 Mariners, 1570.
' London Chronicle, 16-18 March, 1762 ; Ad. i. 581 Admiral
Berkeley, 14 Feb. and 5 Aug. 1805.
' Ad. I. 579 Average based on Admirals' Reports on Rendezvous,
1791-5-
* Ad. I. 580 Memorandum on the State of the Fleet, 1803.
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 327
pressed man or had been procured at the cost of a
pressed man, the loss entailed upon the nation by their
desertion represented an outlay of ;!^840,ooo for raising
them in the first instance, and, in the second, a further
outlay of ;^840,ooo for replacing them.
In this estimate there is, however, a substantial
error ; for, approaching the question from another
point of view, let us suppose, as we may safely do
without overstraining the probabilities of the case,
that out of every three men pressed at least one ran
from his rating. Now the primary cost of pressing
three men on the ;^20 basis being ;^6o, it follows
that in order to obtain their ultimate cost to the
country we must add to that sum the outlay incurred
in pressing another man in lieu of the one who ran.
The total cost of the three men who ultimately
remain to the fleet consequently works out at ;i^8o ;
the cost of each at 26, 13s. 4d. Hence Nelson's
forty-two thousand deserters entailed upon the nation
an actual expenditure, not of ;!f 1,680,000, but of nearly
two and a quarter millions.
Another fact that emerges from a scrutiny of
these remarkable figures is this. Whenever the
number of volunteer additions to the fleet increased,
the cost of pressing increased in like ratio ; whenever
the number of volunteers declined, the pressed man
became proportionally cheaper. Periods in which
the pressed man was scarce and dear thus synchronise
with periods when the volunteer was plentiful ; but
scarcity of volunteers, reacting upon the gangs, and
conducing to their greater activity, brought in pressed
men in greater numbers in proportion to expenditure
and so reduced the cost per head. In this logical
328 THE PRESS-GANG
though at first sight bewildering interrelation of the
laws of supply and demand, we have in a nutshell
the whole case for the cost of pressing as against the
gang. Taking one year with another the century
through, the impress service, on a moderate estimate,
employed enough able-bodied men to man a first-rate
ship of the line, and absorbed at least enough money
to maintain her, while the average number of men
raised, taking again one year with another, rarely if
ever exceeded the number of men engaged in obtain-
ing them. With tranquillity at length assured to the
country, with trade in a state of high prosperity, the
shipping tonnage of the nation rising by leaps and
bounds and the fleet reduced to an inexigent peace
footing, why incur the ruinous expense of pressing
the seaman when, as was now the case, he could be
had for the asking or the making ?
For Peace brought in her train both change and
opportunity. The frantic dumping of all sorts and
conditions of men into the fleet ceased. Necessity
no longer called for it. No enemy hovered in the
offing, to be perpetually outmanoeuvred or instantly
engaged. Until that enemy could renew its strength,
or time should call another into being, the mastery
of the seas, the dear prize of a hundred years of
strenuous struggle, remained secure. Our ships,
maintained nevertheless as efficient fighting-machines,
became schools of leisure wherein a thing impos-
sible amid the perpetual storm and stress of war the
young blood of the nation could be more gradually
inured to the sea and tuned to fighting-pitch.
Science had not yet linked hands with warfare.
Steam, steel, the ironclad, the super- Dreadnought
HOW THE GANG WENT OUT 329
and the devastating cordite gun were still in the
womb of the future ; but the keels of a newer fleet
were nevertheless already on the slips, and with the
old order the press-gang, now for ever obsolete, went
the way of all things useless.
Its memory still survives. Those who despair of
our military system, or of our lack of it, talk of con-
scription. They alone forget. A people who for
a hundred years patiently endured conscription in its
most cruel form will never again suffer it to be lightly
inflicted upon them.
APPENDIX
ADMIRAL YOUNG'S TORPEDO
Dear Nepean, I enclose a little project for
destroying the Enemy's Flatboats if they venture
over to our Coast, which you may shew, if you please,
to your Sea Lords as coming from some anonymous
correspondent. If they can improve upon it so as to
make it useful, I shall be glad of it ; and if they think
it good for nothing, and throw it in the fire, there is
no harm done. As the conveying an Army must
require a very great number of Boats, which must
be very near each other, if many such vessels as I
propose should get among them, they must necessarily
commit great havoc. I cannot ascertain whether the
blocks or logs of wood would be strong enough to
throw the shot without bursting, or whether they
would not throw the shot though they should burst.
I think they would not burst, and so do some Officers
of Artillery here ; but that might be ascertained by
experiment at any time. This sort of Fire-vessel
will have the advantage of costing very little ; and of
being of no service to the Enemy should it fall into
their hands.
W. YOUNG.
Lewes, 14 Aug. 1803.
33
332 THE PRESS-GANG
Secret
** The success of an attempt to land an Army on
an Enemy's Coast, whose Army is prepared to
prevent it, will depend in a great degree on the
regularity of the order in which the Boats, or Vessels,
are arranged, that carry the Troops on Shore ; every-
thing therefore which contributes to the breaking of
that order will so far contribute to render success
more doubtful ; especially if, in breaking the order,
some of the Boats or Vessels are destroyed. For this
purpose Fireships well managed will be found very
useful ; I should therefore think that, at all the King's
Ports, and at all places where the Enemy may be
expected to attempt a landing with Ships of War
or other large Vessels, considerable quantities of
materials for fitting Fireships according to the latest
method should be kept ready to be put on board any
small Vessels on the Enemy's approach; but, as such
Vessels would have little or no effect on Gunboats or
Flatboats, machines might be made for the purpose
of destroying them, by shot, and by explosion. The
Shot should be large, but as they will require to be
thrown but a short distance, and will have only thin-
sided Vessels to penetrate, Machines strong enough
to resist the effort of the small quantity of Powder
necessary to throw them may probably be made of
wood ; either by making several chambers in one
thick Block, as No. i, or one chamber at each end of
a log as No. 2, which may be used either separately,
or fastened together. The Vents should communicate
with each other by means of quick Match, which
r
TV
J^/.
; ; ::
\ . 1
Gf;.3?^^. M
;>
Admiral Voun(;"s Torpkuo.
F"roni the Oriijinal Dniwing at tin- Public Rocord Office.
APPENDIX 333
should be very carefully covered to prevent its sus-
taining damage, or being moved by things carried
about. Such Machines, properly loaded, may be kept
in Fishing boats or other small vessels near the parts
of the Coast where the Enemy may be expected to
land ; or in secure places, ready to be put on board
when the Enemy are expected. The Chambers should
be cut horizontally, and the Machine should be so
placed in the Vessel as to have them about level with
the surface of the water ; under the Machine should
be placed a considerable quantity of Gunpowder ; and
over it, large Stones, and bags of heavy shingle, and
the whole may be covered with fishing nets, or any
articles that may happen to be on board. Several
fuses, or trains of Match, should communicate with
the Machine, and with the powder under it, so
managed as to ensure those which communicate with
the Machine taking effect upon the others, that
the shot may be thrown before the Vessel is blown
up. The Match, or Fuses, should be carefully con-
cealed to prevent their being seen if the Vessel should
be boarded. ... If these Vessels are placed in the
front of the Enemy's Line, and not near the
extremities of it, it would be scarcely possible for
them to avoid the effects of the explosion unless,
from some of them exploding too soon, the whole
armament should stop. Every Machine would prob-
ably sink the Boat on each side of it, and so do
considerable damage to others with the shot ; and
would kill and wound many men by the explosion
and the fall of the stones. ... As the success of
these Vessels will depend entirely upon their not
being suspected by the Enemy, the utmost secrecy
334 THE PRESS-GANG
must be observed in preparing the Machines and
sending them to the places where they are to be kept.
A few confidential men only should be employed to
make them, and they should be so covered as to
prevent any suspicion of their use, or of what they
contain."
PrinUdby Morrison & Gibb Limitsd, Edinburgh
INDEX
22
INDEX
Adams, Capt., 133, 134.
Admiral Spry tender, 303.
Adventure, H.M.S., 234.
Ages below eighteen and over fifty-
five exempt, 84, 85.
Alcock, Henry, Mayor of Water-
ford, 196, 217, 218.
Alms, Capt., 182, 183.
Amaranth, H.M.S., 309.
Ambrose, Capt., 317.
Amherst, Capt., 317.
Amphitrite, H.M.S., 34.
Andover, the press-gang at, 179.
Anglesea, H.M.S., 234.
Anne, Queen, impresses foreign
seamen, 13.
arms of press-gang under, 73.
drummers and fifers pressed for
navy in her reign, 241.
sailors unwilling to serve, 28.
Anson, Admiral Lord, 104.
Anthony, John, pressed with two
protections on him, 102.
Appledore, press-gang at, 72, 290.
Apprentices, exempt from impress-
ment only in some circum-
stances, 85, 86.
in North - country pressed be-
cause their indentures bore
Scotch 14s. stamp instead of
English 15s., 102.
Archer, Capt., 241.
Arms of the press-gang, 72, 72f
Assurance, H.M.S., 35.
Aston, Capt., 319.
Atkinson, Lieut., 221.
Ayscough, Capt., 291.
Baily, James, a ferryman, pressed
for his inactivity, 242.
Baird, Capt., 314.
Balchen, Capt., 104, 234.
Ball, Capt., 198.
Banyan days, 38.
Bargemen impressed in thou-
sands, 92.
Barker, Capt., regulating officer at
Bristol, 94, 288.
midshipman, 302.
Barking, the press-gang at, 209,
210.
Barnicle, William, 247.
Barnsley, Lieut., 208.
Barrington, Capt., 260.
Bath,Bristol gang's fruitless attempt
at, 161.
Bawdsey, 243.
Beaufort, East Indiaman, 126.
Beecher, Capt., 67, 208.
Bennett, Capt., 59, 60, 163, 308,
316.
Bertie, Capt., 26.
Bethell, Capt., paid damages for
wrongfully impressing, 238,
316.
Bettesworth, John, claims privi-
lege of granting private pro-
tections to Ryde and Ports-
mouth ferrymen, 105.
Biggen, Charles, 289.
Billingsley, Capt., 119, 313.
Bingham, William, 204.
Birchall, Lieut., 208, 220.
Bird-in-hand, H.M.S., 316.
Birmingham, sham gangs at, 67.
Black Book of the Admiralty,
30.
Blackstone, Sir W., 15, 16.
Blackwater, men working turf boats
on, not exempt, 95.
Blanche, H.M.S., 35.
Blear-eyed Moll, 263.
Blonde, H.M.S., 192.
Boats for the press-gang, 72.
337
338
INDEX
Boat steerers on whalers exempt
from impressment, 90.
Boatswains, conditions of exemp-
tion, 87-9.
Bonttta sloop, 135, 303.
Boscawen, Capt., 98, 109, no.
Boston, Mass., 215.
Bounty system, the, 22.
Bowen, Capt., 184.
Box, Lieut., 192.
Boys, Capt., 147, 216.
Brace, Lieut., 246.
Bradley, Lieut., 182.
Brawn, Capt., 209.
Breedon, Lieut., 182.
Brenton, Capt. Jahleel, afterwards
Vice-Admiral, 59,214, 269 ,275.
Brenton, E. P., Naval History^ 44.
Brenton, Lieut., 195.
Brereton, Capt., 238.
Brett, Capt., 1 10, 234.
Bridges a favourite haunt of the
press-gang, 177.
Brighton, the press-gang at, 18 1-3,
248.
Bristol, the press-gang at, 81, 83,
94, 114, 162, 246, 249, 262,
272, 288.
Bristol jail as press-room, 281.
Bristol, H.M.S., 313.
Britannia trading vessel, three
of the crew shot in resisting
the press-gang, 229 ; the ship
captured and taken to port,
the affair not within the
coroner's purview, the bodies
buried at sea, 230 ; court-
martial acquits officers, 231.
Brixham, the press-gang at, 114.
Broadfoot case, the, 205, 206.
Broadstairs fishermen, 129,
the press-gang at, 176.
Bromley, Capt. Sir Robert, 242.
Bullard, Richard, a fiddler per-
suaded to go to Woolwich to
play and for payment was
handed to the gang, 242.
Bull- Dog sloop, 274.
Burchett, Josiah, Observations on
the Navy, 19.
Burrows, Sam, 251.
Butler, Capt., 189, 190.
Byron, Lord, 57.
Calahan, a gangsman, killed in
attempting an arrest, 206.
Cambridge bargemen, press-gang
among, 92.
Campbell, Admiral, 274.
Cape Breton, 51.
Caradine, Samuel, 287, 288.
Carey, Rev. Lucius, 251.
Carmarthen, Admiral the Marquis
of, 197.
Carolina, 51.
Carpenters, conditions of exemp-
tion, 87, 89.
on warships on coast of Scot-
land could be replaced by
shipwrights pressed from the
yards, 88.
Carrying the ship up, 124-9.
Cartel ships, 141.
Castle, William, an alien, impressed
on his honeymoon, 81, 262.
Castleford, the press-gang at, 164.
Cawsand safe from the press-gang,
158.
Cecil,|William,LordBurleigh,96,97.
Centurion, H.M.S., Anson's flag-
ship, whose crew on their
return had life-protection from
the press, 104.
Chaplains, 35-7.
Charles ll., 36, 63.
Chatham, crimpage at, 50.
Chatham, H.M.S., 209.
Chester, the press-gang, at 58, 163,
219, 220, 251, 290.
Chevrette corvette, 274.
Clapp, Midshipman, 223.
Clark, George, 247.
Clephen, James, 274,
Clincher %\a\-\ix\%, 141.
Cockbum, Bailie, of Leith, 215.
Cogboume's electuary, 41.
Coke, Sir E., 15.
Collingwood, Admiral Lord, 59.
Lieut., 237.
Colvill, Admiral Lord, 47.
Colville, Lieut., 301, 302.
Convoys, 132, 146.
Conyear, John, 242.
Cooper, Josh, 66.
Cork, crimpage at, 50, 164.
the press-gang at, 72, 141, 163,
164, 165.
INDEX
339
Comet bomb ship, 128.
Cornwall, the press-gang in, 157.
Coversack, safe from the press-
gang, 158.
Coventry, Mr. Commissioner, 78.
Coventry, sham gangs at, 67.
Cowes, press-gang at, 56, 180.
Crabb, Henry, 234.
Crews depleted by the press-gang,
124-9.
Crick, William, 308.
Crimps, 48-50, 151, 164.
as sham gangsmen, 67.
Cromer, the suspicions of the in-
habitants bring the press-gang
to take a noted Russian, 246.
Crown Colonies, desertions in,
50-2.
Croydon, the press-gang around,
177.
Cruickshank, John, chaplain, 35.
Culverhouse, Capt., 248.
Customs, Board of, loi.
Dansays, Capt., 134.
Danton, Midshipman, 223.
Darby, Capt., 69.
Dartmouth, H.M.S., 36, 37.
Dartmouth, press-gang at, 72.
Davidson, Samuel, of Newcastle,
applies for life protection, 104.
" DD," discharged dead, in muster
books against names of persons
deceased, 207.
Deal, press-gang at, 56,60, 62, 174,
196-8, 217, 255-6.
cutters, 117.
Death of sailor in resisting impress
"accidental," 227.
Debusk, John, shot by the press-
gang on the Britannia, 229.
Dent, Capt., 197.
Deptford, the press-gang at, 189,
260.
Desertion from the Navy, 46-9,
259, 260.
Devonshire, H.M.S., 197.
Dipping the flag, 239-40.
Director, H.M.S., 275.
Discipline in the Navy, 30-5.
Disinfecting a ship, 37.
Dispatch sloop, 216.
Dolan, Edward, 153.
Dominion and Laws of the Sea.
See Justice, A.
Dorsetshire, H.M.S., 189-91.
Douglas, Capt. Andrew, 31.
Dover, press-gang at, 56, 60, 62,
197-8, 248.
Downs, crimpage in the, 49.
press-gang in, 13, 56, 116, 145,
224, 225.
Doyle, Lieut., 199.
Dreadnought, H. M.S., 44, no, 184.
Drummers pressed for the Navy,
241.
Dryden, Michael, illegally pressed,
65, 272.
Dryden's sister, 272.
Dublin, sham gangs at, 68, 69, 199.
the press-gang at, 115.
Duke, H.M.S., 314.
Duke of Vandome, H.M.S., 317.
Duncan case, the, 14.
Dundas, Henry, 104.
Dundonald, Lord, Autobiography,
25.
Dunkirk, H.M.S., 44.
Eccentricity leads to impressment,
245, 246.
Eddystone lighthouse, building de-
layed through impressment of
workmen, 105.
builders of the third, protected,
105.
keepers at, put inward-bound
ships' crews ashore, 153.
Edinburgh, press-gang at, 56.
Edmund and Mary collier, 264.
Edward ill. on the Navy, 28.
Elizabeth, Queen, 96.
Elizabeth ketch, 89.
Ely bargemen, press-gang among,
92.
Emergency crews of men unfit for
pressing supplied to merchant-
men by the crimps, 150-3.
Emergency men working on their
own account, 153, 154.
places of muster for, 152.
English Eclogues. See Southey, R.
Evading the press-gang. See under
Press-gang, How it was evaded.
Evans, Richard, keeper of Glou-
cester Castle, 282.
340
INDEX
Exemption from impressment, not
a right, 79-
of foreigners, 80, 8i.
negroes not included, 82.
of landsmen only theoretical, 80.
property no qualification for ex-
emption, 80.
of harvesters, 83, 84.
of gentlemen, judged by appear^
ances, 84,
below 18 and over 55 years, 84, 85.
of apprentices dependent on cir-
cumstances, 85, 86,
of merchant seamen dependent
on circumstances, 86, 87.
of masters, mates, boatswains,
and carpenters dependent on
circumstances, 87-9.
of some of crew of whalers, 90.
of Thames wherrymen by quota
system, 92.
of Tyne keelman by the same, 93.
of Severn and Wye trow-men by
io7 levy, 94.
did not extend to turf boats on
Shannon and Blackwater, 95.
special for four on each fishing
vessel, and later for all engaged
in taking, curing, and selling
fish, 97.
of Worthing fishermen for a levy,
98-9.
of Scottish and Manx fishermen,
on similar terms, 99.
worthless without a document of
protection, icx>-2.
Exeter, the press-gang at, 62, 179.
Falmouth^ H.M.S., 145, 146, 238.
Falmouth, press-gang at, 192.
Faversham, the press-gang at, 176.
Femu, H.M.S., 313.
Ferries, a favourite haunt of the
press-gang, 178.
Fevershaniy H.M.S., 37.
Fifers pressed for the Navy, 241.
Fire on ship board, 147.
Fisheries, carefully fostered, three
fish days made compulsory, 95.
became a great nursery for sea-
men, few exemptions granted, at
first special concessions only to
the whale and cod fisheries, 96.
Fisheries, continued
later only such number as the
warrant specified might be
taken, and these the Justices
chose ; in 1801 no person em-
ployed in taking, curing, or
selling fish could be impressed,
.97-
with their best men impressed,
only small smacks could be
worked, 98.
a quota system preferred by the
fishermen of some ports, 98, 99.
in Cornwall, the men turned tin-
ners in the off-season, 157.
Flags, flying without authority, 240.
omission to dip, 239-40.
Fleet, Liberty of, 261.
Folkstone market-boats, 1 1 7.
Folkstone, press-gang at, 56, 6a
Forcible entry by the press-gang
illegal, 199.
Foreigners impressed, 13, 8r, 148.
theoretically exempt, 80, 81.
married to English wives con-
sidered naturalised, 81.
in emergency crews, 153.
Frederick the Great, 311, 312.
Freeholders at one time exempt
from impressment, 13-15, 82.
Fubbs, H.M.S., 134.
Gage, Capt., 88.
Galloper, tender to the Dread-
nought, 119.
Ganges, H.M.S., 274.
Garth, Dr., 41.
Gaydon, Lieut., 61.
Gentlemen exempt from the im-
press, but j udged by appearance
and manner, 84.
Gibbs, Capt., 61.
Glory, H.M.S., 34.
Gloucester, the press-gang at, 178.
Gloucester Castle used as press-
room, 281, 282.
the keeper's magic palm, 282.
Godalming, the press-gang at, 55,
62.
Golden, John, Lord Mayor's barge-
man, wrongfully impressed, 93.
Good, James, midshipman, 62.
Goodave, Midshipman, 291, 292.
INDEX
341
Gooding, Richard, 243.
Gosport, the press-gang at, 184,
189, 190, 242.
Gravesend, the press-gang at, 176.
Gray, John, 249.
Great Yarmouth, press-gang at, 56,
114, 164, 246.
Greenock, crimpage at, 49.
press-gang at, 56, 60, 213-5.
Trades Guild, 213-5.
Greenock ferries, the press-gang at,
178.
Greenwich Hospital, 43.
Grimsby, the press-gang at, 114.
Habeas Corpus, writs of, as means
of arresting, and so freeing,
pressed men for debts not
owing, 309.
Half-pay officers, their projects
and inventions, 21.
Hamoaze, the, an entrepot for
pressed men, 293.
Harpooners exempt from impress-
ment, 90.
Harrison, Lieut., 214.
Hart, Alexander, 198.
Harwich, H.M.S., 31.
Haverfordwest, press-gang at, 56, 6 1 .
Hawke, Admiral Sir Edward, 230,
231,
Hawke, H.M.S., 316.
Haygarth, Lieut., 218.
Health and illness, 40, 41.
Hector, H.M.S., 57.
Herbert, Emanuel, 205.
Hind armed sloop, 82.
Historical Relation of State Affairs.
See Lutterell, N.
Hogarth's " Stage Coach," 104.
Hook, Joseph, 272.
Hope tender, 237.
Hotten, J. C., List of Persons of
Quality, etc., who went from
England to the American
Plantations, 262.
Hull, press-gang at, 62, 66.
Humber, the press-gang on, 136.
Hurst Castle, the press-gang at, 1 14.
Ilfracombe, the press-gang at, 61.
Impressment. See Pressed labour.
Informers, 188.
Inland waterways and the gang
72.
at one time without the juris-
diction of the admirals, 90-1.
Innes, Capt., 82.
Ipswich, the press-gang at, 203.
Isis, H.M.S., 241.
Isle of Man fishermen, 99.
Jackson, Daniel, pressed from the
Chester Volunteers, 220.
Jamaica, 50, 51.
Jason, H.M.S., 52.
Jervis, John, Earl of St. Vincent, 259.
Jews, pressed on account of bandy
legs, 244.
John and Elizabeth pink, 223, 224.
John, King, impressment under, 4-
7, 28, 80.
Johnson, Rebecca Anne, 267.
Jones, Paul, 141, 204.
Justice, A., Dominion and Laws of
the Sea, 28, 82.
Keith, A., parson of the Fleet, 261.
Observations on the Act for
Preventing Clandestine Mar-
riages, 261.
Kilkenny, the press-gang at, 290.
King's Lynn, press-gang at, 63, 71,
89, 142, 156, 180, 250.
Kingston, William, case of, 13.
King William, Indiaman, 224, 225.
Lady Shore, the, 249.
Landsmen exempt only in theory,
82, 83.
Latham, Capt., 313.
Law officers' opinions on pressing,
14-6, 68, 70, 75, 79, 88, 93, 196,
198, 219, 282, 292, 297, 301,
310.
Leave, stoppage of, 44, 45.
Leeds, the press-gang at, 164.
Leith, crimpage at, 49.
press-gang at, 56, 59, 212, 213,
215.
Lennox, H.M.S., 163, 316.
Letting, John, pressed with two
protections on him, 102.
Lewis, Edward, chaplain, 37.
Libraries, ships', 43.
Lichfield, H.M.S., 241.
842
INDEX
Ucome, H.M.S., Ii8.
Limehouse Hole, the press-gang at,
2IO-I.
Lindsay, Admiral the Earl of,
Instructions, 31.
Linesmen on whalers exempt from
impressment, 90.
Liskeard, the press-gang at, 179.
List of Persons of Quality , etc., who
went from England to the
American Plantations. See
Hotten, J. C.
Litchfield, H.M.S., 32.
Littlehampton, the press-gang at,
182.
Liverpool, crimpage at, 49.
press-gang at, 56, 64, 163, 185,
196, 204, 218, 219, 220, 248.
Lodden Bridge, the press-gang at,
178.
London, the press-gang in, 174,
175, 206, 216.
Londonderry, the press-gang at,
237-
Longcroft, Capt., 61.
Loo, H.M.S., 196.
Love, Henry, gets life protection as
promised by Pitt and Dundas,
104.
Lowestoft, the press-gang at, 114.
Lulworth, 157.
Lundy Island, safe from the press-
gang, but not to the sailors'
liking, 158.
crews marooned on, 158.
Lutterell, N., Historical Relation of
State Affairs, 262.
Capt. Hon. Jas., 274, 275.
Lymington, the press-gang at, 294.
M'Bride, Admiral, 61.
M'Cleverty, Capt., 217, 218.
M'Donald, Alexander, impressed
under the age of twelve, 85.
Charles, 247.
M'Gugan's wife, 269.
M'Kenzie, Lieut., 272.
M'Quarry, Lachlan, 271.
Magna Carta, its provisions con-
trary to impressment, 5-7.
Mansfield, Lord, 16.
Margate, the press-gang at, 176.
Maria brig, 193.
Marines, 128, 129.
Marooned crews on Lundy Island)
158, 159.
Martin galley, 210,
iWary smuggler, 135.
Masters, conditions of exemption,
87-9.
Mastery of the sea, a necessity for
England, 19.
Mates, conditions of exemption,
87-9.
Medway, press-gang on, 139-40.
Medway, H.M.S., 189, 190.
Men in lieu, 125-9, 153.
Merchant seamen, conditions of
exemption, 86-9.
unprotected when sleeping ashore,
89-91.
the most valuable asset to the
Navy, 107.
Merchant service, hard conditions
of crews, 28.
Mercury, H.M.S., 196.
Messenger, George, 136.
Mike, James, hanged for desertion,
47.
Moll Flanders, 299.
Monarch, H.M.S., 314.
Monmouth, H.M.S., 44.
Monumenta furidica, 30.
Morals in the Navy, 258-9.
improved by Jervis, Nelson, and
Collingwood, 259.
Moriarty, Capt, 165.
Mortar sloop, 317.
Mostyn, Admiral, 314.
Mediator tender, 273, 275.
Mitchell, Admiral Sir D., 274.
Montagu, Admiral, 42.
Mousehole, safe from the press-
gang, 158.
Moverty, Thomas, pressed, not
having protection on him, loi.
Nancy of Deptford, 260.
Naseby, H.M.S., 36.
Nassau, H.M.S. , 35.
Naval History. See Brenton, E. P.
Navy, the growth of, in i8th
century, 20.
natural sources of supply of
crews, 20.
hard conditions of service in, 29.
INDEX
343
Navy, continued
discipline in, 30-5.
provisions in, 36-8.
comforts in, 39-40.
Negroes not exempt from im-
pressment, 82.
Nelson, Admiral Lord, 24, 40, 47,
48, 61, no, 259.
Nemesis^ H.M.S., 198.
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, press-gang
at, 56, 61, 94, 186, 188, 193, 204.
grand protection enjoyed by, 93.
New England, 51,
Newgate compared with the press-
room, 280, 281,
Newhaven, the press-gang at, 164,
182,
Newland, safe from the press-gang,
158.
Newquay, safe from the press-
gang, 158.
Nore, the press-gang at the, 116,
141.
the mutiny at, 273-9.
an entrepot for pressed-men, 293.
Norfolk, Indiaman, 145.
Norris, John, 274.
North Forland, press-gang at, 116.
Nymph, H.M.S., 33, 35.
Oakley, Lieut., 174.
Oaks, Lieut., 14, 221.
O'Brien, Lieut., 198.
Observations on Corporeal Punish-
ment, Impressment, etc. See
Penrose, Admiral Sir V. C.
Observations on the Act for Pre-
venting Clandestine Marriages.
See Keith, A.
Observations on the Navy. See
Burchett, J.
Okehampton, the press-gang at, 179.
Onions, Thomas, 246.
Orford, H.M.S., 137.
Orkney fishermen, 99.
Osborne, Admiral, 231.
Osmer, Lieut., 194.
Otter sloop, 88.
Oyster vessels, 119.
Pallas, H.M.S., 25.
Parker, Richard, president of the
mutineers at the Nore, 273-9.
Parkgate, a resort of seamen, 163,
291.
Paying off discharged entire crews,
24.
Paying the shot, 124.
Pay of sailors, 43-5.
deferred, 44-6.
Pembroke, Earl of, Lord High
Admiral, 297.
Penrose, Admiral Sir V. C, Ob-
servations on Corporeal Punish-
ment, Impressment, etc., 44.
Pepys, S., 9, II, 41, 74, 78, 271.
Peter the Great, Czar of Russia,
12, 13.
Petitions of seamen of the Fleet
and others, 17, 34, 35, 68, 83,
197, 271, 283, 304, 305, 308,
318, 320, 322.
Phoenix, H.M.S., 238, 316.
Pill, a favourite haunt of sailors, and
shunned by gangsmen, 159-
61, 272.
Pilots, 141, 142, 154.
Pitt, William, 104, 165.
Plymouth, the press-gang at, 89,
176, 205, 273.
Polpero, safe from the press-gang,
158.
Poole, press-gang at, 65, 90, 157,
194, 195, 203, 236, 242.
mayor refuses to back press-
warrants, 90, 193.
Popham, Admiral Sir Home, his
schemefor coast defence, 165-
168.
Portland Bill, press-gang off, 229.
Portland Island, 157.
Portsmouth, desertions at, 48.
the press-gang at, 176, 184, 228,
242, 263.
Post-chaise, sailors in, 185, 186.
Press-boats sunk at sea, 222-5.
Pressed labour (see also Press-
gang), antiquity of, i, 3.
for civil occupations, i.
for warfare, 2.
means of enforcing, 2, 3, 5,
7-9.
contrary to the spirit of Magna
Carta, 5, 6.
penalties for resistance, 7.
derivation of the term, 9, 10.
344
INDEX
Pressed labour, continued
the classes from which drawn,
II, 12.
exemptions from, 13.
necessity of, in English Navy,
19-53.
its crippling effect on trade, 20.
Press-gang, the
why it was a necessity for the
Navy, 23-52.
its services not needed by some
captains, 25.
what it was, 54-76.
the official and the popular
views, 54.
the class of men it was com-
posed of, 54, 55-
its quarters, landsmen joining
the land force not to be
pressed for sea service, 55.
ship-gangs entirely seamen,
varying numbers m gang, 56.
the officers, 56, 57.
the shore service the grave of
promotion, 57.
general character of officers
ashore, 58-9.
duties of the Regulating Cap-
tain, 60,
pay and road money, etc., 60-2.
perquisites, peculation, and
bribery in the service, 63-6.
sham-gangs, 66-70.
the rendezvous, 70-2.
boat's arms, 72.
press warrant, 73-6.
whom the gang might take,77-l 05 .
primarily those who used the
sea, yy.
later on trade suffers from the
gang, 78.
exemption granted as an in-
dulgence, 79.
the foreigner first exempted, 80.
but not if he had an English
wife, and was soon assumed
to have one, 81.
negroes not exempt, lands-
men theoretically only, 82.
harvesters were exem pt if hold-
ing a certificate, 83, 84.
gentlemen exempt if dressed
as such, 84.
Press-gang, whom the gang might
take, continued
only those proved to be between
eighteen and fifty-five, 84.
the position of apprentices was
uncertain, 85, 86.
to press merchant seamen was
resented by trade, 86, 87.
masters, mates, boatswains,
and carpenters were exempt,
87.
colliers were exempt up to a
certain proportion, 88.
ship protections did not count
on shore, 89.
mate was not entitled to liberty
unless registered at the
rendezvous, 89.
harpooners were protected out
of season on land or on
colliers, 90.
the press-gang preyed upon its
fellows, 91.
watermen, bargemen, and canal
boat-dwellers were con-
sidered to use the sea, 91, 92.
Thames watermen and some
others exempt if certain
quota of men supplied, 92-4.
large numbers pressed from
Ireland, 95.
fishermen indifferently pro-
tected, but fisheries fostered,
95-100.
all protected persons bound to
carry their protection on
them, 100-2.
an error in protection invali-
dated it, 102.
protections often disregarded,
103.
special protections, 104-5.
its activities afloat, 106-142.
the merchant seamen the prin-
cipal quest, 106.
the chain of sea-gangs, 107-19.
the outer rings, frigates press-
ing for their own crews and
armed sloops as tenders to
ships of the line, and the
vessels employed by regulat-
ing captams at the large
ports, 108-13.
INDEX
345
Press-gang, its activities afloat,
continued
the inner ring of boat-gangs in
harbour or on rivers, 114-9 ;
their methods, 117, 118.
methods of pressing at sea, 119-
24.
complications arising from
pressing at sea, 124-9.
their varied success, 130.
and the right to search foreign
vessels for English seamen,
131, 132.
and convoys, 132.
and privateers, 132-4.
and smugglers, 134-6.
smuggling by, 137.
and ships in quarantine, 1 38-40.
and transports, 140, 141.
and cartel ships, 141.
and pilots, 141, 142.
how it was evaded, 143-71.
in the ship, with her or from
her, 144,
or a combination, 145, 146.
hiding on board from, 147.
evasions assisted by the skip-
per, 148, 149.
and men in lieu and foreigners
in emergency crews, 153.
pilots and fisherman taken by,
when acting as emergency
men, 154.
evaded by desertion from the
ship, 154, 155.
evaded by hiding on land and
changing quarters, 155-7.
Cornwall dangerous for, 157.
safe retreats from, 158-61, 163.
empowered to take Severn and
Wye trow-men, 162.
unsuccessful efforts of, 163-5.
evaded by borrowed, forged,
and American protections
and by disguises, 168-71.
what it did ashore, 172-201.
the sailor betrayed by marked
characteristics ; sailors out-
numbered on shore by the
gang, 173.
Us object the pressing of
sailors who escaped the sea-
gangs, 174.
Press-gang, what it did ashore,
continued
its London rendezvous and
taverns used, 174, 175.
the inland distribution of, 176,
180.
the class of places selected for
operations of, 176, 177.
the land-gangs necessarily am-'
bulatory, 179, 180.
its resting and refreshment
places chosen for purposes
of capture, the methods
adopted, 180.
a hot press at Brighton, 18 1-3.
a ruse at Portsmouth, 184.
how the sailors' liking for drink
was turned to account,
185.
the amount of violence used,
186.
outside assistance to, 187-9.
rivalry between gangs, 189-
91.
assisted by mayors and county
magistrates, 191.
assisted by the military, 191,
192,
townsmen who sided with the
sailors against, 192, 193.
brutal behaviour of, at Poole,
194-5.
resisted at Deal and Dover,
196-8.
forcible entry by, illegal, 199.
magistrates consign vagabonds
and disorderly persons to,
199-201.
how it was resisted, 202-32.
various weapons used agains
203, 204.
gangs-men killed by sailors re-
sisting them, 206.
sailors killed by gangsmen,
206, 207.
by armed bands of seamen,
208-210.
by the populace in attempting
to impress, 210.
pressed-men recaptured from,
211-20.
tenders attacked, 215-7
rendezvous attacked, 217-22.
346
INDEX
Press-gang, resisted, continued
press-boats attacked and sunk,
222-5.
resistance when the press-gang
had come abroad, 225-32.
the hardship of impressment on
arrival from long voyage,
225, 226.
the only means of resistance,
226.
a sailor's death in such case
" accidental," casual, un-
avoidable, or disagreeable,
227.
a case in point, 228-32.
at play, 233-56.
humorous reason given for im-
pressing a person, 206.
inculcating manners by means
of the press, 233.
the respect due to naval officers,
234-8.
the outsider liable to be pressed
for breach of naval etiquette,
234-8.
rudeness to the press-
gang treated the same
way, 236-7, 238.
damages from officers for
wTongful impressment, fail-
ure to dip the flag, or flying an
unauthorised flag, might lead
to pressing from that crew,
239, 240.
unseamanlike management of
a ship laid the crew open to
pressmg, 241.
pipers and fiddlers, etc., im-
pressed, 242.
ridiculous reasons given
for impressing, 242.
unsuspecting passenger in a
smuggler declared owner of
contraband and pressed, 243.
tattoo marks and bandy legs
lead to pressing, 244.
any eccentricity sufficient to
ensure the attention of the
press-gang, 245, 246.
used by trustees to keep heirs
from their money, and by
parents to rid them of incor-
rigible sons, 247.
Press-gang, at play, continued
used for purposes of retaliation,
247-50.
used by strikers to get rid of a
"blackleg," 250-1.
used by stem parent to part his
daughter and her lover,
251.
a drunken cleric's revenge by
means of, 251-2.
by pressing a sailor, causes his
late bedfellow to be hanged
as his murderer, 252-6.
and women, 257-79.
of women and sailors in
general, 257-61.
lack of sentiment in gangsmen,
261.
women impressed by, 263, 264.
women masquerading as men
to go to sea, 264, 268.
women in the gang, 268.
the hardship brought on women
by the gang, 268, 271.
fostered vice and bred paupers,
270.
women who released sailors
from the press-gang, 272,
273-
the devotion of RichardParker*s
wife, 273-9.
In the clutch of, 280-310.
the press-room, what it was ;
strongly built and small as it
might be, could hold any
number, 280.
Bristol gaol and Gloucester
Castle used as press-rooms,
281.
inadecjuate precautions for re-
tainmg pressed men on the
road, regulations for rendez-
vous, 282.
victualling in the press-room,
283, 284.
regulating or examining for fit-
ness for service, 284.
fabricated ailments and defects,
284-9-
dispatching pressed men to
the fleet, 289-94.
tenders hired for transport of
pressed men, 294.
INDEX
347
Press-gang, In the clutch of, con-
tinued
comfort and health of pressed
men on tenders, 295, 296.
the victualling of pressed men
on tenders, 297.
prevention of escape, 299-301.
an attempt to escape with the
Toj^^r tender escapes from,
300, 301.
The Union tender cut out from
the Tyne by the pressed
men, 301, 302.
various excitements aboard,
303-
a final examination, 304, 305.
petitions, 305, 306, 308.
substitutes, 306-7.
How the gang went out, 311-29.
causes of withdrawal of press-
gang, 311.
the increasingly bad quality of
the product, 312-9.
the spirit of restlessness and
mutiny engendered, 320,
321.
the injury to trade, 323.
only continued so long by the
apathy of the people, 324-5.
the cost of impressing, 326-8.
Press-Gang, or Love in Low Life,
The, 261.
Press warrants, 73-6, 90, 97, 108,
122.
forged, 69.
Presting, the original term and its
meaning, 9, 10.
Prest money, 10, 61, 74.
Price, Capt., 237.
Prince George guardship at Ports-
mouth, 228.
Princess Augusta, a letter of
marque, 133, 134.
Princess Augusta tender, 229.
Princess Louisa, H.M.S., 260.
Privateers, loss of seamen by, 50-
2, 146.
pressing from, 132-4.
recapture of pressed crew of,
219.
Prize money, 45.
Profane abuse of crews by officers,
29.
Protections, for masters, mates,
boatswains, and carpenters, 87.
worthless, if the holder were
ashore, 88.
bound to be always carried, 100-2.
slightest error in description
invalidated, 102.
were often disregarded, 103.
special, 104, 105.
for men in lieu, 128.
for crews of convoys and priv-
ateers expired on arrival in
home waters, 132, 143.
lent, bought, and exchanged, 168.
American, 169-71.
Provisions in the Navy, 36-8.
Quarantine, 138, 140.
Queensferry, the press-gang at, 178.
Quota men, 22, 92-4, 98, 99, 165,
275, 289.
" R" for "run" in ships' books to
denote deserter, 151.
Raleigh, Sir Walter, 28, 38.
Ramsgate, the press-gang at, 251.
Reading, the press-gang at, 179.
Registration of seamen, 22.
Regulating, i.e. examination of
pressed-men for fitness, 284.
ailments and defects fabricated
or assumed, 284-9.
Regulating captains, 60, 85.
character of a, 58, 59.
Repulse, H.M.S., 276.
Rendezvous, 55, 70-2, 213.
attacked, 217-22, 272.
regulations of, 282, 283.
Rescue of pressed men from the
gang, 211-20.
Reunion, H.M.S., 34.
Rhode Island, 51.
Rice, 42.
Richard 11., 90.
Richards, John, midshipman, 62.
Richardson, Lieut., 137.
Right of search, 131, 132.
Roberts, Capt. John, 89.
Rochester, the press-gang at, 195.
Rodney, Admiral Lord, 179, 228.
Roebuck, H.M.S., no.
Romsey, the press-gang at, 179.
Routh, Capt., 164.
348
INDEX
Royal Sovereign, H.M.S., 139, 147,
216.
Ruby gunship, 26.
Rudsdale, Lieut., 118.
Rum, 39, 40.
Rupert, H.M.S., 317.
Russia, impressment in, 12, 13.
Russian Navy, 12.
Ryde, the Lord of the Manor,
claimed the privilege of pri-
vate protections for his ferry-
men to Portsmouth and Gos-
p>ort, 105.
the press-gang at, 180.
Rye, H.M.S., 212.
Rye, the press-gang at, 141.
Sailor, the word disfavoured by
Navy Board, 26.
a creature of contradictions, 26,
27, 45-
St. Ives, safe from the press-gang,
158.
St.Lawrence River, deserters m, 47.
St. Vincent, Earl of. See Jervis, J.
Salisbury, the press-gang at, 179.
Sanders, Joseph, 307.
Sandwich, H.M.S., flag-ship at the
Nore, 275, 277, 278.
Sax, Lieut., 229.
Scipio, H.M.S., 316.
Scott, John, pressed when his pro-
tection was lying in his coat
beside him, loi.
Scottish fishermen, 99.
Seahorse, H.M.S., 36, 69.
" Serving out slops," 30.
Severn trow-men, exempted from
impress by 10% levy, 94.
Court of Exchequer rules the
reverse, 162.
Seymour, Lieut., 140.
Sham gangs, 66-70, 268.
Shandois sloop, 125.
Shannon, H.M.S., 34, 322.
Shannon, men working turf boats
on, not exempt, 95.
Shark, sloop, I2ii2^.
" She " applied to a ship, a recent
use, 236.
Sheemess, crimpage at, 49.
Shields, press-gang at, 14, 64, 247,
262.
Ships, impressment of, 4, 5.
Shipwrights in Scotch yards could
be pressed as carpenters on
warships, 88.
Shirley, Governor, 215.
Shoreham, the press-gang at, 182.
Shrewsbury, H.M.S., 197, 224, 225.
Shrewsbury, sham gangs at, 67.
Sloper, Major-General, 182, 192.
Smeaton, John, 105.
Smugglers, crew of, pressed, 136.
unsuspecting passenger declared
owner and pressed, 243.
Solebay, H.M.S., 33, 203.
Southampton, the press-gang at,
115.
Southey, Robt, English Eclogues,
263.
Southsea Castle, H.M.S., 196.
Spithead, crimpage at, 50.
an entrep6t for pressed men, 293.
Spy sloop of war, 135.
Squirrel, H.M.S., 209.
Stag, H.M.S., 135.
Stag privateer, 219.
Stangate Creek, the fray at, 140.
Stephens, George, impressed at
thirteen, 85.
Stephenson, George, 193.
Stepney Fields, press-gang at, 208,
209.
Stillwell, John, 247.
Stourbridge, the press-gang at, 178,
207, 208, 292.
Strike-me-blind. See Rice.
Sturdy, Ralph, shot by the press-
gang on the Britannia, 229.
Sunderland, press-gang at, 64, 65,
215, 223, 224, 272.
Surgeons, 36, 41, 60.
Swansea, 61.
Tailors pressed on account of bandy
legs, 244.
Talbot, Mary Anne, 265.
Tasker tender, 299.
Tassell, William, a protected mate,
pressed ashore, 89.
Taunton, Denny-Bowl quarry, near
three girls as sham gang, 70,
268.
the press-gang at, 179.
Taylor, Lieut,, 216.
INDEX
349
Taylor, William, 251.
Teede, John, undone by tattoo
marks, 244.
Tenders, 108-10, 112-5.
attacked, 215-7.
hired for transport of pressed
men, 294.
the health and comfort of pressed
men on, 296.
their victualling, 297.
attempts to escape from and
with, 300-3.
Thames, press-gang on the, 115,116.
wherrymen exempted by levy of
one in five, 93.
ThetiSy H.M.S., 189.
Thomson, Lieut., 241.
Thurlow, Lord, 14, 93.
Ticket men. See Men in lieu.
Tobacco, 39.
Trading classes the greatest
sufferers from impressment, 78.
not without resentment, 78, 79.
various trades gradually ex-
empted, 80-100.
Tramps. See Vagabonds.
Transports, 140, 141.
Travelling, cost of, 60, 61.
Trial and Life of Richard Parker ^
277, 279.
Trim, William, 194, 203.
Trinity House, loi.
Triton brig, 118.
Triton^ Indiaman, 145.
Turning over of crews, 24, 25.
Tyne keelman exempt from im-
press by levy the men sup-
plied being obtained by them
by bounties, 93.
Union tender, 301.
Utrecht, H.M.S., 251.
Vagabonds handed over to the
press-gang, 199.
Vanguard, H. M.S., 47, 119.
Vernon, Admiral, 39, 41, 50, 319.
Victualling in the press-room, 283,
284.
Virginia, 51.
Wages due to sailors to date of
impressment, 124, 125.
Walbeoff, Capt., 194.
Ward, Ned, Wooden World Dis-
sected, 2.7.
Waterford, press-gang at, 58, 59,
83, 118, 196, 217, 218, 237, 242.
Watermen's language, 239.
Watson, Lieut., 237.
Watts, John, punished with 170
lashes, 31.
Weapons used against the press-
gang, 203, 204, 216.
Weir, Alexander, 214.
Wellington, Duke of, 33.
Whalers, some of crew of, exempt
from impressment, 90.
Whitby, the press-gang at, 221, 272.
White, John, pressed at Bristol
ninety yards from his vessel,
90.
Whitefoot, James, impressed at
Bristol, 83.
Whitworth, Charles, Envoy to
Russia, 13.
" Widows' men," 52.
Williams, John, 308.
Willing Traveller smuggler, 135.
Wilson, John, shot by the press-
gang on the Britannia, 229.
Winchelsea, H.M.S., 34.
Winstanley, London butcher,
served as pressed man 16
years, 83.
Wolf armtd sloop, 136.
Women and the Press-gang, 159,
188. See also under Press-
gang, "The Press-gang and
Women," 257-79.
Wooden World Dissected. See
Ward, Ned.
Wool, illegal export of, 136.
Worth, Capt., 218.
Worthing fishermen, 98.
Wye trow-men exempted from
impress by 10% levy, 94.
Court of Exchequer rules the
reverse, 162.
Yarmouth Roads, the press-gang
in, 135-
" Yellow Admirals," 57.
Yorke, Sol. -Gen., 75.
Young, Admiral, 49.
his torpedo, 165, 331-4.
Unwer.lty ot Camomla FACIUTY
SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY ^^^333
!^
<^
^ r^
UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY
AA 000 066 487