Iiili;ii/;i;i,! m.^^A. lih 1 :i! Iliiii LIBRARY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA PRESENTED BY Mr. H. H. Kil lani UCSa LIBRARX Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2007 witii funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.arcliive.org/details/countrydoctorotliOObalziala WELL, WHAT IS IT?- BENASSIS ASKED H. DE BALZAC THE Country Doctor (Le Medecin de Campagne) And other stories TRANSLATED BY ELLEN MARRIAGE WITH A PREFACE BY GEORGE SAINTSBURY ^ PHILADELPHIA The Gebbie Publishing Co., Ltd. 1897 CONTENTS. PREFACE THE COUNTJiY DOCTOR I. THE COUNTRYSIDE AND THE MAN II. A doctor's round . . . • III. THE NAPOLEON OF THE PEOPLE IV. THE COUNTRY DOCTOR'S CONFESSION V. ELEGIES THE COMMISSION IN LUNACY {L' Interdiction) THE ATHEISTS MASS ... 77 146 202 247 283 366 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. "WELL, WHAT IS IT?" BENASSIS ASKED . . FroJiHspiece PAGE " M. BENASSIS WENT OVER THERE " I9 AN OLD LABORER MAKING HIS WAY ALONG THE ROAD, IN COM- PANY WITH AN AGED WOMAN 99 THE MAN OF WHOM HE WAS IN SEARCH SOON APPEARED ON THE TOP OF A PERPENDICULAR CRAG I39 I TOOK HER UP BEHIND ME IN THE SADDLE .... 255 Drazvn by JV. Boucher, PREFACE. In hardly any of his books, with the possible exception of "Eugenie Grandet," does Balzac seem to have taken a greater interest than in "The Country Doctor; " and the fact of this interest, together with the merit and intensity of the book in each case, is, let it be repeated, a valid argument against those who would have it that there was something essentially sinister both in his genius and in his character. "The Country Doctor" was an early book; it was pub- lished in 1833, a date of which there is an interesting mark in the selection of the name " Evelina," the name of Madame Hanska, whom Balzac had just met, for the lost Jansenist love of Benassis ; and it had been on the stocks for a considerable time. It is also noteworthy, as lying almost entirely outside the general scheme of the "Comedie Humaine" as far as personages go. Its chief characters in the remarkable, if not absolutely impeccable, repertoire of MM. Cerfberr and Chris- tophe (they have, a rare thing with them, missed Agathe the forsaken mistress) have no references appended to their articles, except to the book itself; and I cannot remember that any of the more generally pervading dramatis personce of the Comedy makes even an incidental appearance here. The book is as isolated as its scene and subject — I might have added, as its own beauty, which is singular and unique, nor wholly easy to give a critical account of. The minor charac- ters and episodes, with the exception of the wonderful story or legend of Napoleon by Private Goguelat, and the private himself, are neither of the first interest, nor always carefully (ix) X PREFACE. worked out : La Fosseuse, for instance, is a very tantalizingly unfinished study, of which it is nearly certain that Balzac must at some time or other have meant to make much more than he has made ; Genestas, excellent as far as he goes, is not much more than a type ; and there is nobody else in the foreground at all except Benassis himself. It is, however, beyond all doubt in the very subordination of these other characters to Benassis, and in the skilful group- ing of the whole as background and adjunct to him, that the appeal of the book as art consists. From that point of view there are grounds for regarding it as the finest of the author's work in the simple style, the least indebted to superadded ornament or to mere variety. The dangerous expedient of a recit, of which the eighteenth-century novelists were so fond, has never been employed with more successful effect than in the confession of Benassis, at once the climax and the centre of the story. And one thing which strikes us immediately about this confession is the universality of its humanity and its strange freedom from merely national limitations. To very few French novelists — to few even of those who are generally credited with a much softer mould and a much purer morality than Balzac is popularly supposed to have been able to boast — would inconstancy to a mistress have seemed a fault which could be reasonably punished, which could be even reasonably represented as having been punished, in fact, by the refusal of an honest girl's love in the first place. Nor would many have conceived as possible, or have been able to represent in life- like colors, the lifelong penance which Benassis imposes on himself. The tragic end, indeed, is more in their general way, but they would seldom have known how to lead up to it. In almost all ways Balzac has saved himself from the dangers incident to his plan in this book after a rather miraculous fashion. The Goguelat myth may seem disconnected, and he did as a matter of fact once publish '\f separately ; yet it sets off (in the same sort of felicitous manner of which Shake PREFACE. xi speare's clown-scenes and others are the capital examples in literature) both the slightly matter-of-fact details of the beati- fication of the valley and the various minute sketches of places and folk, and the almost superhuman goodness of Benassis, and his intensely and piteously human suffering and remorse. It is like the red cloak in a group ; it lights, warms, inspirits the whole picture. And perhaps the most remarkable thing of all is the way in which Balzac in this story, so full of goodness of feeling, of true religion (for if Benassis is not an ostensible practiser of religious rites, he avows his orthodoxy in theory, and more than justifies it in practice), has almost^ entirely escaped the sentimentality plus unorthodoxy of similar work in the eighteenth century, and the sentimentality plus orthodoxy of similar work in the nineteenth. Benassis no doubt plays Providence in a manner and with a success which it is rarely given to mortal man to achieve ; but we do not feel either the approach to sham, or the more than approach to gush, with which similar handling on the part of Dickens too often af- fects some of us. The sin and the punishment of Benassis, the thoroughly human figures of Genestas and the rest, save the situation from this and other drawbacks. We are not in the Cockaigne of perfectibility, where Marmontel and God- win disport themselves ; we are in a very practical place, where time-bargains in barley are made, and you pay the respectable, if not lavish, board of ten francs per day for entertainment to man and beast. And yet, explain as we will, there will always remain some- thing inexplicable in the appeal of such a book as " The Country Doctor." This helps, and that, and the other; we can see what change might have damaged the effect, and what have endangered it altogether. We must, of course, acknowl- edge that as it is there are longueurs (tedious stretches), intru- sionsof Saint Simonian jargon, passages oi galimatias {nox\%tVi%€) and of preaching. But of what in strictness produces the good xii PREFACE. effect we can only say one thing, and that is, it was the genius of Balzac working as it listed and as it knew how to work. The book was originally published by Mme. Delaunay in September, 1833, in two volumes and thirty-six chapters with headings. Next year it was republished in four volumes by Werdet, and the last fifteen chapters were thrown together into four. In 1836 it reappeared with dedication and date, but with the divisions further reduced to seven ; being those which here appear, with the addition of two, " La Fosseuse " and "Propos de Braves Gens," between "A Travers Champs" and "Le Napoleon du Peuple." These two were removed in 1839, when it was published in a single volume by Charpen- tier. In all these issues the book was independent. It be- came a "Scene de la Vie de Campagne " in 1846, and was then admitted into the "Comedie." The separate issues of Goguelat's story referred to above made their appearance first in L' Europe Litteraire for June 19, 1833 {before the book form), and then with the imprint of a sort of syndicate of publishers in 1842. Of the two short stories, '* The Atheist's Mass" is the greatest. Its extreme brevity makes it almost impossible for the author to indulge in those digressions from which he never could entirely free himself when he allowed himself much room. We do not hear more of the inward character of Des- plein than is necessary to make us appreciate the touching history which is the centre of the anecdote; the thing in general could not be presented at greater advantage than it is. Nor in itself could it be much, if at all, better. As usual, it is more or less of a personal confession. Balzac, it must always be remembered, was himself pretty definitely "on the side of the angels." As a Frenchman, as a man with a strong eighteenth-century tincture in him, as a student of Rabelais, as one not too much given to regard nature and fate through rose-colored spectacles, as a product of more or less godless education (for his schooldays came before the neo-Catholic PREFACE. xiil revival), and in many other ways, he was not exactly an or- thodox person. But he had no ideas foreign to orthodoxy ; and neither in his novels, nor in his letters, nor elsewhere, would it be possible to find a private expression of unbelief. And such a story as this is worth a bookseller's storehouse full of tracts, coming as it does from Honore de Balzac. " The Commission in Lunacy " is sufficiently different, but it is almost equally good in its own way. It is indeed impos- sible to say that there is not in the manner, though perhaps there may be none in the fact, of the Marquis d'Espard's resti- tution and the rest of it a little touch of the madder side of Quixotism ; and one sees all the speculative and planning Balzac in that notable scheme of the great work on China, which brought in far, far more, I fear, than any work on China ever has or is likely to bring in to its devisers. But the conduct of Popinot in his interview with the Marquis is really admirable. The great scenes of fictitious yf«(fjj