OSCAR WILDE BIBLIOGRAPF : LONDON MODELS. PROFESSIONAL models are a purely modern invention. To the Greeks, for instance, they were quite unknown. Mr. Mahaffy, it is true, tells us that Perikles used to present peacocks to the great ladies of Athenian society in order to induce them to sit to his friend Pheidias, and we know that Polygnotus introduced into his picture of the Trojan women the face of Elpinike, the celebrated sister of the great Conserva- tive leader of the day, but MODEL. these yrandes dames clearly From a Drawing by do not come under our cate- HARPER FENNINGTOX. . f ,, ,j gory. As for the old masters, they undoubtedly made con- stant studies from their pupils and apprentices, and even their religious pictures are full of the portraits of their friends and relations, but they do not seem to have had the in- < tunable advantage of the existence of a class of people whose sole profession is to pose. In fact the model, in our sense of the word, is the direct creation of Academic Schools. Every country now has its own models, except America. In New York, and even in Boston, a good model is so great a rarity that most of the artists are reduced to painting Niagara and millionaires. In Europe, how- ever, it is different. Here we have plenty of models, and of every nationality. The Italian models are the best. The natural grace of their attitudes, as well as the wonderful picturesqueness of their colouring, makes them facile often too facile subjects for the painter's brush. The French models, though not so beautiful as the Italian, pOIMflf a quick ness ol intellect ual .sympathy, a capacity in fact of understanding the artist, which is quite remarkable. They have also a great command over the varieties of facial expression, are peculiarly dramatic, and can chatter the argot of the atelier as cleverly as the critic of the Gil Bias. The English models form a class entirely by themselves. They are not so picturesque as the Italian, nor so clever as the French, and they have absolutely no tradition, so to speak, of their order. Now and then some old veteran knocks at a studio door, and proposes to sit as Ajax defying the lightning, or as King Lear upon the blasted heath. One of them some time ago called on a popular painter who, happening at the moment to require his services, engaged him, and told him to begin by kneeling down in the attitude of prayer. " Shall I be Biblical or Shakespearean, sir ? " asked the veteran. ' Well Shake- spearean," answered the artist, wondering by what subtle nuance of expression the model would convey the difference. " All right, sir," said the professor of posing, and he solemnly knelt down and began to wink with his left eye ! This class however is dying out. As a rule the model, nowadays, is a pretty girl, from about twelve to twenty-five years of age, who knows nothing about art, cares less, and is merely anxious to earn seven or eight shillings a day without much trouble. English models rarely look at a picture, and never venture on any aesthetic theories. In fact they realize very completely Mr. Whistler > idea, of the function of an art- nit ic, for they pass no criticisms at all They accept all schools of art with the grand i .it hl ieit y of the auctioneer, and sit to a fantastic young impressionist as readily as to a learned and laU.rious academician. They are neither for the Whistlerites, nor against them ; the quarrel between the school of facts and the school of effects touches them n<>t ; ideal- istic and naturalistic are words that convey no 314 LONDON MODELS. meaning to their ears ; they merely desire that the studio shall be warm, and the lunch hot, for all charming artists give their models lunch. As to what they are asked to do they are equally indifferent. On Monday they will THE GRAND STOLID BRITISH SCHOOL. From a Drawing by HARPER PENNINGTON. don the rags of a beggar-girl for Mr. Pumper, whose pathetic pictures of modern life draw such tears from the public, and on Tuesday they will pose in a peplum for Mr. Phoebus, who thinks that all really artistic subjects are necessarily B.C. They career gaily through all centuries and through all costumes, and, like actors, are only interesting when they are not themselves. They are extremely good-natured, and very accommo- dating. " What do you sit for 1 " said a young them can talk Greek, many can look Greek, which to a nineteenth -century painter is naturally of great importance. If they are allowed, they chatter a great deal, but they never say anything. Their observations are the only banalities heard in Bohemia. However, though they cannot appreciate the artist as an artist, they are quite ready to appreciate WANTS SITTINGS. From a Drawing by HARPER PENNINGTON. the artist as a man. They are very sensitive to kindness, respect, and generosity. A beautiful model who had sat for two years to one of our most distinguished English painters, got engaged to a street vendor of penny ices. On her marriage the painter sent her a pretty wedding present, and received in return a nice letter of thanks- THE MAN WHO SITS FOR COSTUMES AND EXPRESSION. From a Drawing by HARPER PENNINGTON. artist to a model who had sent him in her card (all models by the way have cards and a small black bag). " Oh, for anything you like sir," said the girl ; "landscape if necessary!" Intellectually, it must be acknowledged, they are Philistines, but physically they are perfect at least some are. Though none of /// j 'WILL SIT FOR ANY HISTORICAL PERSONAGE.' From a Drawing by HARPER PENNINGTON. with the following remarkable postscript : " Never eat the green ices ! " When they are tired a wise artist gives them a rest. Then they sit in a chair and read penny dreadfuls, till they are roused LONDON MODELS. 315 from the tragedy of literature to take their place again in the tragedy of art. A few of ili. in >moke cigarettes. This however is regarded by the other models as shoeing a want of seriousness, and is not generally approved of. They are engaged by the day and by the half-day. The tariff is a shilling an hour, to which great artists usually :..M an omnibus tan*. The two best things about them arc their extraordinary prettiness, and their extreme respectability. As a class they are very well behaved, particularly those who sit for the figure, a fact which i's THE MOOT ECONOMICAL MODEL, From a Drawing by HARPER I'ENNIXOTON. curious or natural according to the view one takes of human nature. They usually marry well, and sometimes they marry the artist. In neither case do they ever sit again. For an artist to marry hi> model is as fatal as for a hair, and wash his face, and bring him tlu round of the fttuli iv>ult n. .t ;i roust-inns aim, the result in fact of the mathematical calculation of curves and distances, of absolute precision of eye, of the scientific knowledge of the equilibrium of forces, and of perfect physical training. A good acrobat is always graceful though grace is never his object ; he is grace- ful because he does what he has to do in the best way in which it can be done graceful because he is natural. If an ancient Greek were to come to life now, which considering the probable severity of his criticisms would be rather trying to our conceit, he would be found far oftener at the circus than at the theatre. A good circus is an oasis of Hellenism in a world that reads too much to be wise, and thinks too much to be beautiful. If it were not for the running- ground at Eton, the towing-path at Oxford, the Thames swimming baths, and the yearly circuses, humanity would forget the plastic perfection of its own form, and degenerate into a race of short-sighted professors, and spectacled precieusea ! Not that the circus- proprietors are, as a rule, conscious of their high mission. Do they not bore us with the haute ecole, and weary us with Shakespearean clowns > t Still at least they give us acrobats, and the acrobat is an artist. The mere fact that he never speaks to the audience shows how well he appreciates the great truth that the aim of art is not to reveal personality but to please. The clown may be blatant, but the acrobat is always beautiful. He is an interesting combination of the spirit of Greek sculpture with the spangles of the modern costumier. He has even had his niche in the novels of our age, and if Manette Salomon be the unmasking of the model, Lea Frtres Z<:n< is the apotheosis of the acrobat. : \iran 1> the influence of the ordinary model on our English school of painting, it an not be said that it is altogether good. It is of course an advantage tor tho young arti>t MtthiK in his studio to be able to isolate " a little corner of life," as the From -h say, from disturbing surroundings," and to study it under certain effects of light and shade. But tins v-ry i>olation leads often t.. mere mannerism in the painter, and robs him of that broad acceptance of the general facts of life which is the very essence of art. Model-painting, in a word, while it may be the condition of art, is not by any means its aim. It is simply practice, not perfection. Its use trains the eye and the hand of the painter, its abuse produces in his work an effect of mere posing and prettino the secret of much of the artificiality of modern art, this constant posing of pretty people, and when art becomes artificial it be- comes monotonous. < >m>ide the little world of the studio, with its draperies and its bric-a-brac, lies the world of life with its infinite, its Shakespearian variety. We must, however distinguish between the two kinds of models, those who sit for the figure and those who sit for costume. The study of -the first is always excellent, but the costume- model is becoming rat her wearisome in modern pictures. It is really of very little use to dress up a London girl in Greek draperies and to paint her as a goddess. The robe may be the robe of Athens, but the face is usually the face of Brompton. Now and then, it is true, one comes across a model whose face is an exquisite anachronism, and who looks lovely and natural in the dress of any century but her own. This however is rather rare. As a rule models are absolutely de noire sticle, and should be painted as such. Unfortunately they are not, and as a con- sequence we are shown every year a series of scenes from fancy dress balls which are called historical pictures, but are little more than mediocre representations of modern people masquerading. In France they are wiser. The French painter uses the model simply for study, for the finished picture he goes direct to life. However we must not blame the sitters for the shortcomings of the artists. The English models are a well-behaved and hard- working class, and if they are more interested in artists than they are in art, a large section of tho j'tihlir is in the same condition, and most of our modern exhibitions seem to justify its choice. OSCAR WILDE. l/s/5