UC-NRLF 
 
 B H D77 121 
 
Bristow's Editorials 
 
 That Caused Such a Stir 
 in Kansas 
 
 WAS HE RIGHT? 
 
 Read them, note the date when pub- 
 lished, and observe the accuracy with 
 which he has analyzed the trend of 
 governmental affairs. 
 
 ADAMS BBOS OO. TOPEKA 
 
\-^ 
 
 A FRIEND'S TRIBUTE 
 
 When Seuator Bristow was in Washington last May, as chairman of 
 the Kansas Public Utilities Commission, to oppose the 15%, or $1,000,000 
 a day, increase in interstate freight rates, he saw the menace to this coun- 
 try from greed, extravagance and graft. 
 
 He thought some one ought to speak out against it. So he wrote from 
 there a signed editorial on "The Situation in Washington," which appeared 
 in the Salina Journal. He was at once denounced vehemently by the parti- 
 sans of the President and the metropolitan press as unpatriotic for criticis- 
 ing the administration while the country was at war. However, he never 
 flinched before the criticism and denunciation, nor hesitated in his fight for 
 efficiency and honesty in the public service, but has kept it up to the present 
 time. He has maintained from the beginuir.g that honesty and efficiency in 
 governmental affairs in time oi war is as essential as in time of peace. 
 
 Events have confirmed every statement he made. A number of the 
 abuses he so severely cri'cicisad iiave bsen ternedied and other conditions im- 
 proved. Men, who condemned him then, now say he has rendered a great 
 public service. If he had been in the Senate how much more effectively he 
 could have fought and how much more useful he could have been to the 
 nation. 
 
 This country now imperatively needs men of his discernment and cour- 
 age in public life. Kansas can render a great service to the nation by 
 sending him back to the Senate. — Beloit Gazette. 
 
 Special attention is called to the last two editorials in this pamphlet. 
 
"• (The signed editorial that started the 
 Kansas fight.) 
 
 that ai-e to m^ke 
 
 billions out- of the 
 
 THE SITUATION IN 
 TON. 
 
 WASHING- 
 
 Washington, May 23, 1917, (by 
 mail) — Never, except at inauguration 
 times, have the hotels of Washington 
 been so jammed as now. Hundreds 
 of contractors, salesmen, and manu- 
 facturers besiege the departments 
 and special boards in desperate ef- 
 forts to get their share, and more, 
 of the seven billions which congress 
 has authorized to be spent in carry- 
 ing on the war. There are hundreds 
 of lobbyists Vrho are for the war and 
 high taxes, but who want to get out 
 of paying their share, or as much 
 of it as they can. There are hun- 
 dreds of railway officials and experts 
 who want to drive through a fifteen 
 per cent increase in freight rates so 
 as to get their share of loot in this* 
 period of grab and plunder. Hun- 
 dreds of others are applicants for 
 civil appointments or commissions in 
 the army or navy. Altogether they 
 make up a grand rush of visiting 
 patriots, heroes, economists, states- 
 men, experts, grafters, and all man- 
 ner of men and women. 
 
 This assemblage is a fitting con- 
 comitant of war. Cupidity and greed, 
 gloating appetites for pillage and 
 plunder, vain desire for pomp and 
 gold-laced parade, unrestrained con- 
 viviality, which arouses the latent 
 passion for rapine and destruction 
 are there. Behind it all, in the dimly 
 concealed background are the giant 
 financial and industrial organizations 
 
 war. Mr., V/ils^n; in ,sjud.\ea ^Ji^i^ 'glee- 
 ful phrases proclaims tills ^ holy 
 cause. Mr. McAdoo, secretary of 
 the treasury, flies about the country 
 making frantic appeals to the peo- 
 ple to lend their money to the gov- 
 ernment at 31/^ per cent, when they 
 hesitate because they need all the 
 return on it they can get in order 
 to procure the necessities of life and 
 pay the excessive taxes due to the 
 war. 
 
 What will happen when a full real- 
 ization of the nature of these pro- 
 ceedings comes to the average citi- 
 zen, we do not know; but we con- 
 fidently predict that some vain and 
 arrogant statesmen who knowingly 
 or unknowingly have been the pliant 
 tools of unrestrained avarice will un- 
 derstand what has happened to them. 
 JOSEPH L. BRISTOW. 
 
 SATURDAY, JUNE 2, 1917. 
 
 SUGGESTIONS TO MR. HELVER- 
 ING. 
 
 Mr. Guy Helvering has telegraphed 
 the governor, demanding that the edi- 
 tor of this paper be removed from 
 the chairmanship of the public utili- 
 ties commission, because of certain 
 observations he made as to the pres- 
 ent situation in Washington. From 
 Mr. Helvering's somewhat indefinite 
 telegram we infer that his objection 
 was directed to the following state- 
 ment that appeared in the Journal 
 over our signature: 
 
"H'u R d'r e (is cf contractors, 
 fale^n^ert, arid manufacturers be- 
 siege the departmsnts and spe- 
 cial boards in desperate efforts 
 to get their share, and more, of 
 the seven billions which con- 
 gress has authorized to be spent 
 in carrying on the war. There 
 are hundreds of lobbyists who 
 are for the war and high taxes, 
 but who, want to get out of pay- 
 ing their share, or as much of it 
 as they can. There are hun- 
 dreds of railway officials and ex- 
 perts who want to drive through 
 a fifteen per cent increase in 
 freight rates so as to get their 
 share of loot in this period of 
 grab and plunder. Hundreds of 
 others are applicants for civil 
 appointments or commissions in 
 the army or navy. Altogether 
 they make up a grand rush of 
 visiting patriots, heroes, econo- 
 mists, statesmen, experts, graft- 
 ers, and all manner of men and 
 women. 
 
 This assemblage is a fitting 
 concomitant of war. Cupidity 
 and greed, gloating appetites for 
 pillage and plunder, vain desire 
 for pomp and gold-laced pa- 
 rade, unrestrained conviviality, 
 which arouses the latent passion 
 for rapine and destruction are 
 there. Behind it all, in the dimly 
 concealed background are the 
 giant financial and industrial or- 
 ganizations that are to make bil- 
 lions out of the war." 
 Now my dear Mr. Helvering, for 
 your information we beg to advise 
 
 you that those statements are true. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, thai 
 it is common rumor in Washingtpn 
 that congressmen and other influen- 
 tial men have obtained commission': 
 in the army for relatives, said com-l 
 missions have been dated before the 
 parties were sent to the training 
 camps or had taken any examination. 
 This was done, so we were informed, 
 that said favorites might have sen- 
 iority in rank over thousands of 
 other worthy young men who wwe in 
 the camps working honestly for the 
 rank to which they aspired, believ- 
 ing that they would be ^ven a 
 square deal if they earned it. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, that 
 at hearings of the house and senate 
 committees charges have been made 
 that contractors are being paid by a 
 per cent of the cost for construction 
 of army cantonments. That these 
 contractors were paying $7 a day for 
 labor that could be obtained for $4. 
 That they were paying excessive 
 prices for materials, thereby inflating 
 the cost of the work, so as to get a 
 larger commission for construction. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, that 
 it is openly alleged that such methods 
 and blunderings have resulted in an 
 increase in the estimated cost of the 
 construction of these cantonments 
 from 75 millions of dollars to 150 
 millions. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, that 
 the lobby of the munition makers 
 was strong enough with the senate 
 committee on finance to have the tax 
 on munitions removed from the reve- 
 nue bill and a tax on tea, coffee and 
 
other articles of universal consump- 
 tion substituted therefor. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, that 
 the lobbies that now swarm the cor- 
 ridors of the capitol have induced 
 the senate committee on finance to 
 remove from the revenue bill the in- 
 creased surtax on excessive inxiomes 
 of more than $40,000 per annum, that 
 was put in the bill on the floor of 
 the house, on motion of Mr. Lenroot 
 of Wisconsin, and that as the bill now 
 stands the tax on great incomes 
 will not be half so much as that by 
 Great Britain. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, that 
 under pressure from innumerable 
 lobbyists this revenue bill is being 
 so shaped that great corporations 
 with watered stock will practically 
 escape taxation, and that large in- 
 dustrial concerns are going to be 
 permitted to pass the tax on to the 
 consumer. 
 
 ;, You know, or ought to know, that 
 there is now a powerful lobby of 
 metropolitan newspapers and maga- 
 zine publishers in Washington de- 
 manding that the increased postage 
 rates recommended by the postmas- 
 ter general be not adopted, but that 
 a gross tax on advertising be sub- 
 stituted therefor, and that these lob- 
 byists state that they want that kind 
 of a tax because they can pass it on 
 to the advertiser and thereby get 
 out of paying it themselves, while 
 'they could not pass on the postal tax. 
 
 You know, or ought to know, that 
 the amount of money to be raised 
 by taxes on wealth and income is to 
 
 be reduced and the amount obtained 
 by the sale of bonds increased, so 
 that the poor man will not only carry 
 the burden of this war on the field of 
 battle, but also carry the load of 
 taxes for years to come. 
 
 You do know that thousands of 
 men have flocked to Washington and 
 are using every device known to the 
 the ingenuity of man to obtain and 
 are obtaining soft berths for them- 
 selves, their relatives and political 
 friends. Yet because the editor of 
 this paper called the attention of 
 the country and the administration to 
 this condition, you pronounce him a 
 traitor. Apparently instead of try- 
 ing to correct the evils, you seek to 
 hide them. However, your blatant 
 babblings will not fool the people 
 long, if at all. 
 
 I further beg leave to suggest to 
 you that men will not be deterred by 
 vituperation and abuse from stating 
 the truth about the manner of con- 
 ducting the public business. This 
 is a country where free speech has 
 not yet been denied. The facts as 
 to the expenditure of the seven bil- 
 lions of dollars will be known, and 
 further, Mr. Helvering, I beg to ad- 
 vise you that, the traitor is not he 
 who exposes graft, but the one who 
 covers it up. You may think it 
 patriotic to draft the youth of this 
 land to die in the trenches of Europe 
 and to permit the bloated munition 
 maker to escape proper taxation and 
 keep his blood-stained gold, but we 
 do not. And regardless of the brazen 
 effrontery with which you seek to 
 
intimidate men from the expression 
 of facts, we propose to continue to 
 portray the conditions as they are. 
 Not as a traitor to his country, but 
 as a patriot who has contempt for 
 a congressional trimmer and hatred 
 for a public thief. 
 
 TUESDAY, MAY 22, 1917. 
 
 SHOULD NOT OBJECT TO OUR 
 SHARE OF THE TAX. 
 
 It is unfortunate that certain news- 
 paper organizations of the country 
 are making such a determined effort 
 to prevent an increase in the rates 
 of postage on second-class matter. 
 There is no reason why the news- 
 papers should not bear their share of 
 the war burden. If there is any 
 change made in the postage schedule 
 it should be in a reduction of the 
 letter postage from three to two 
 cents, because we must admit that 
 our government is carrying our pa- 
 pers at less than cost of transporta- 
 tion, while it is making a profit on 
 the handling of letters at two cents 
 per ounce. 
 
 One of the strange things to us is 
 that some of the newspapers that 
 have b^en loudest in their demands 
 for war and heavy appropriations are 
 now fighting vigorously to prevent 
 any increase in their postal tax. 
 
 The Journal does not relish paying 
 more than double the postage it has 
 been paying. It amounts to a heavy 
 tax; but we can see no reason why 
 our business should not be treated, 
 so far as taxation is concerned, as 
 other business is. Of course, it takes 
 just that much out of our profits, but 
 the business of the country has to 
 sacrifice profits to pay these war 
 bills. Our protest has been against 
 creating the bills. 
 
 They were not created with our 
 consent or approval, but they have 
 been created. The people of the 
 United States are legally and moral- 
 ly bound to pay them, and it is far 
 more honorable for this generation to 
 shoulder the burden than to pass it 
 
 on to our children. They will have 
 burdens of their own, when the re- 
 sponsibilities of human affairs rest 
 upon their shoulders. So the pub- 
 lishers' lobby that is in Washington 
 to fight the increase of second-class 
 rates should come home. 
 
 FRIDAY, MAY 25, 1917. 
 
 MORE HUMOR. i 
 
 General Pershing has been selected 
 to lead the first expedition to France, 
 because of his brilliant achievements 
 in Mexico, so we are informed by dis- 
 patches sent out from Washington. 
 
 We do not reflect upon General 
 Pershing as an able military officer. 
 He stands well in the army, and so 
 far as we have ever heard has always 
 discharged his duties ably and patri- 
 otically. He is one of our best men. 
 But the amusing part of the dispatch 
 is that he is to go to Europe because 
 of his meritorious service in Mexico. 
 
 We suppose that the merit con- 
 sisted in obeying the orders of the 
 Washington administration. He was 
 sent out with instructions to capture 
 Villa "dead or alive." After he had 
 gotten some 150 or more miles into 
 Mexico, giving some prospects of 
 breaking up the band, Pershing was 
 ordered to stop and there he was 
 held for month after month in th« 
 enemy's country, forbidden to execute 
 any military movements or to carry 
 out his former orders. He experi- 
 enced a long period of "watchful 
 waiting" and then was ordered to 
 return. 
 
 The patience with which he obeyed 
 orders to go to Mexico and do noth- 
 ing and come back again are very 
 creditable to him, far more so than 
 to the Washington administration 
 that gave the orders, and we trust 
 that his experiences in Europe on 
 this second mission will be less 
 humiliating to him, the army and 
 the country than were his experience? 
 in Mexico. 
 
 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 6, 1917. 
 
 MAKING MONEY FROM WAR. 
 
 Mr. Arthur Sears Henning, Wash- 
 ington correspondent of the Ghicagc 
 Tribune in Saturday's issue, said: 
 "Recent hearings in the house 
 
and senate appropriation com- 
 mittees have thrown some light 
 on the tremendous increase in the 
 estimated cost of building the 
 cantonment camps. In some 
 cases it has been charged that 
 contractors have been paying two 
 or three times as much for their 
 material as necessary, because 
 their profits are to be based on 
 a percentage of the total cost of 
 their work. 
 
 "Furthermore, it has been 
 charged that contractors have 
 paid as much as $7 a day for 
 labor which they could get for 
 $4 a day, the cost of their work, 
 and consequently their profits, 
 being increased." 
 
 Mr, Henning should be careful. 
 The publication of such charges may 
 cause him to be arrested for treason. 
 Does not Mr. Henning know that to 
 intimate that there is graft, or to 
 publish statements that would ques- 
 tion the infallibility of the admin- 
 istration is to commit a felony, and 
 that rank partisans would have free 
 speech and freedom of the press both 
 suppressed. 
 
 When the embalmed beef contro- 
 versy broke out during the Spanish- 
 American war and the scandal relat- 
 ing to it was exposed, nobody was 
 accused of treason, and the papers 
 that now demand the execution of 
 all critics of the administration, were 
 the- foremost in the attacks on the 
 McKinley administration. McKinley 
 accepted the criticism, corrected the 
 abuse, and did not send district at- 
 torneys and United States marshals 
 over the country to arrest, and 
 threaten with arrest, those who had 
 criticised his administration. He did 
 not demand censorship of the press, 
 or ask that he be given dictatorial 
 power over the lives and fortunes 
 of his opponents. 
 
 But not so now. Any man or 
 woman who demands a square deal 
 for the government and the people, 
 or denounces duplicity, vaccillating 
 weakness or graft is branded a hire- 
 ling of Germany. But the attorney 
 general and his district attorneys and 
 marshals will find that this is yet a 
 free country, though its liberties are 
 threatened. That there are men and 
 women who still have the courage to 
 expose dishonesty in the public serv- 
 
 ice. That they will not be deterred 
 by threats and abuse, and that time 
 will demonstrate that they are true 
 patriots, and not the plunderers who 
 are coining millions out of the blood 
 of their fellow men, 
 
 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 19177" 
 
 A PERTINENT ILLUSTRATION. 
 
 The report of the conference com- 
 mittee on the war budget was re- 
 jected by the house of representatives 
 and sent back to the committee for 
 revision. One of the items that 
 brought the severest criticism was the 
 appropriation of $1,400,000 to pur- 
 chase the old Jamestown exposition 
 site as a naval training station. 
 
 An item of $3,000,000 was incor- 
 porated by the senate committee into 
 the bill to pay for this site. This 
 was done, so press dispatches indi- 
 cate, upon the request of Senator 
 Martin of Virginia, chairman of the 
 committee on appropriations of the 
 senate. It was reduced in the con- 
 ference between the two houses from 
 $3,000,000 to $1,400,000. 
 
 When the conference committee re- 
 port was before the house, this item 
 was attacked by Representative Kel- 
 ley of Michigan, It appears that the 
 buildings on this site had been pur- 
 chased at sheriff's sale years ago for 
 $250,000 and many of them were 
 practically junk, yet these old build- 
 ings were included in the appro- 
 priation bill at $600,000. Mr, Kelley 
 in discussing the matter, said: 
 
 "This proposition is not a new one. 
 It has been before congress for ten 
 years and was never looked upon 
 with favor. The present chairman 
 of the naval affairs committee never 
 believed the price was a fair one." 
 
 Representative Bathrick of Ohio, a 
 democrat, speaking of the bill, said: 
 
 "This thing is full of graft, and the 
 people ought to know about it." 
 
 Representative Longworth of Ohio, 
 developed the fact that many of the 
 buildings for which the $600,000 was 
 to be paid, had not been occupied for 
 ten years, and, therefore, were prac- 
 tically worthless. 
 
 Mr. Kelley declared that the price 
 of $1,400,000 for the whole tract was 
 extravagant and ought not to be 
 paid. He stated that he had been 
 all over the ground and that the 
 
water front site was a shoal for 1,200 
 feet out, having a depth of water of 
 only from one to three feet. 
 
 This is an illustration of what is 
 going on in Washington. We are 
 glad to know that some members of 
 congress are giving attention to their 
 obligations to their constituents and 
 trying to stop a few of the grafts. 
 We are also pleased to note that 
 some democratic congressmen have 
 the courage to stand out against tlic 
 loot. 
 
 Let me inquire, where was the 
 Hon. Guy Helvering when the discus- 
 sion of this bill was before the 
 house of representatives. Was he 
 too busily engaged in formulating 
 advice to the governor of this state 
 as to how he should run the affairs 
 of his office to give attention to his 
 own business? Or has he any ob- 
 jections to such items as this going 
 into the apprcpriation bills in this 
 period of "grab and plunder?" 
 
 Probably he thinks it is all right 
 to permit patriotic Virginians to 
 obtain such choice and juicy plums of 
 graft from the national treasury in 
 these times of war. Why did not he 
 and his brilliant colleague, the Hon. 
 Dudley Doolittle rise in their might 
 and denounce as traitors Bathrick, 
 Kelley, Lenroot and others for de- 
 claring that the bill was full of 
 graft? 
 
 MONDAY, JUNE 18, 1917. 
 
 WHY NOT GET TOGETHER? 
 
 The Kansas City Star enquires, 
 "What is the matter with Bristow?" 
 Our answer is, "Nothing." He is the 
 same today he has been heretofore. 
 It happens that his opinions and 
 those of the Star on some subjects of 
 current interest differ. This occurs 
 occasionally. At such times Bristow 
 wonders what is the matter with the 
 Star. The Star asks, "What is the 
 matter with Bristow?" 
 
 The matter is that they hold dif- 
 ferent opinions. That is all. Bris- 
 tow does not believe that Wilson, 
 having acquiesced in the invasion 
 of Belsfium and having declared that 
 the sinking of the Lusitania was not 
 a hostile act, had any other sufficient 
 cause for a declaration of war. The 
 Star evidently believes he had. 
 
 Bristow believes that after we were 
 
 in the war the army should have been 
 raised by the volunteer system. The 
 Star was for conscription. 
 
 Bristow does not believe that we 
 should draft millions of the flower of 
 American youth and send them into 
 the vortex of the European hell, to 
 be torn and mutilated in the awful 
 carnage that prevails there. The 
 Star evidently believes we should. 
 
 However, the war is here and the 
 draft has been ordered. Those sub- 
 jects, therefore, are water that has 
 already gone over the dam. Now 
 for the nub of this article. 
 
 War is upon us and, as is always 
 the case, cupidity and insatiable 
 avarice are getting in their work. 
 Graft is manifest in many places. 
 The army camps are costing twice 
 what they ought. This is due to 
 unwarranted extravagance and in 
 some places to open corruption. 
 
 The administration is urging the 
 people to economize in their personal 
 affairs and contribute liberally to 
 every governmental activity. The 
 people are responding beyond its ex- 
 pectations. Yet, at the same time 
 there is the wildest profligacy in 
 governmental expenditures. Property 
 is being sold to the government at 
 two and three times what it is worth. 
 Last week congress authorized the 
 purchase of the old Jamestown ex- 
 position grounds at $1,200,000. These 
 temporary buildings were sold ten 
 years ago for $250,000 and many of 
 them have stood idle since. This old 
 ruin is not worth $200,000. Many 
 similar transactions are occuring. 
 
 The tax bill is being shaped to 
 favor the rich and oppress the poor. 
 Ti-ust magnates are supervising gov- 
 ernment purchases and selling prod- 
 ucts of their own factories to it &• 
 prices which they fix themselves. 
 
 They claim great credit for work- 
 ing for the people for nothing and 
 say they are selling their goods to 
 the government at less than the mar- 
 ket price. The fact is they fix the 
 market price at what they please 
 because they completely control the 
 product. The market price is of no 
 consequence since they name it and 
 can collect from the government 
 whatever they choose to charge. 
 
 This is illustrated by the case of 
 the president of the aluminum trust, 
 who is a member of the advisory 
 
council. He has sold to the govern- 
 ment a million canteens, made at his 
 own factory and claims great credit 
 because he has charged less than the 
 market price. Yet, he himself, fixes 
 the market price for aluminum the 
 world over, for he has, admittedly, 
 a world-wide trust on that metal. 
 This is but one illustration. The cop- 
 per trust and the steel trust are 
 doing the same thing. Now, why 
 does not the Star denounce this in- 
 sidious and destructive graft? It has 
 done so before. Why not now? 
 
 We believe it is patriotism, not 
 treason, to destroy these evils by 
 ruthless exposure. They are as dan- 
 gerous to the life of this republic as 
 cancer is to the human body. They 
 are as infamous and as destructive to 
 the welfare of the nation in times 
 of war as in times of peace. There- 
 fore, while the Star is asking what 
 is the matter with Bristow, he is 
 asking what is the matter with the 
 Star. Why not come in and help 
 us fight for the preservation of 
 national integrity and the protection 
 of national honor? 
 
 FRIDAY, JUNE 22, 1917. 
 
 A MEASURE OF GREAT CON- 
 CERN. 
 
 We have not been favored with a 
 copy of the present food bill which 
 is now before congress and the pas- 
 sage of which is being urged by the 
 administration, so we are unable to 
 pass judgment upon the wisdom of 
 its provisions. 
 
 We are somewhat apprehensive 
 when we note that Representative 
 Haugen of Iowa, a sturdy old Nor- 
 wegian statesman is bitterly oppos- 
 ing the measure because he thinks 
 it is aimed at the producing agri- 
 cultural class; and when Senator 
 Gore of Oklahoma, Senator Vardaman 
 of Mississippi and a few other sena- 
 tors whose devotion to the pTiblic in- 
 terests cannot be questioned are bit- 
 terly fighting the measure. 
 
 However, this must be said that 
 any measure that undertakes to im- 
 pose a burden on the producers of 
 food products will be a grave injus- 
 tice to the agricultural interests of 
 our country, and a serious injury 
 to the welfare of the American 
 people. 
 
 It is of the highest importance no'W 
 to encourage food production. How- 
 ever anv legislation that seeks to 
 curb the greed and penalize the crim- 
 inality practiced bj' the dealers in 
 food products will meet with a hearty 
 response from every honest Ameri- 
 can. Large fortunes are not made 
 by the producers of the food products. 
 They are made by dealers in food 
 products. We reproduce an article 
 this week from the Wichita Eagle 
 showing that potatoes were selling 
 within 100 miles of Wichita, in Okla- 
 homa, at $1.50 per bushel at the rail- 
 way station; that the freight rate to 
 Wichita was 18 cents; and that the 
 poatoes were selling in Wichita for 
 over $4 per bushel; that there was 
 somewhere added to the price of 
 these potatoes $2.50 per bushel be- 
 tween the freight yard and the 
 consumer in Wichita. 
 
 This is alleged to be substantially 
 the case in respect to other cities. 
 Great fortunes have been made in 
 the last year by speculators in food. 
 Cold storage plant combinations have 
 bought up and monopolized the avail- 
 able supply and then charged the 
 people excessive profits. 
 
 Some years ago we created a trad^ 
 commission and gave it powers, sup- 
 posedly, to correct such gross abuses 
 in commercial and industrial affairs, 
 but it seems to have been without 
 avail. What this trade commission, 
 composed supposedly of experts who 
 are paid a salary of $10,000 each per 
 year and given large resources to 
 prosecute their investigations, a 
 doing, we are unable to say. 
 
 It endeavored to protect the news- 
 papers against the print paper trust, 
 but has thrown up its hands and said 
 in substance, "We cannot help you. 
 Take care of yourselves." The de- 
 partment of justice has indictments 
 against the promoters of the print 
 paper trust, but they are dragging 
 along the course which suits always 
 take when millionaires are being 
 prosecuted. ' 
 
 If some poor wretch had broken 
 into a grocery 'store and stolen a sack 
 of flour, he would have been on the 
 road to the penitentiary ere this; 
 but these men, who robbed the news- 
 papers of the United States of ap- 
 proximately one hundred million dol- 
 lars last year, will probably not 
 
10 
 
 be tried, or if tried, never convicted. 
 They still are maintaining their un- 
 lawful combination and reaping the 
 profits from their monopoly. 
 
 We sincerely trust that congress 
 will work out a wise law so that the 
 food speculator, who is coining his 
 millions out of the necessities of the 
 people and then frequently with 
 grandiloquent generosity contributing 
 to the Red Cross or buying large 
 quantities of government bonds with 
 patriotic fervor, will receive the pun- 
 ishment which his infamous practices 
 merit. 
 
 MONDAY. JUNE 25, 1917. ~ 
 
 LOCK THE DOOR AFTER THE 
 HORSE IS STOLEN. 
 
 The Kansas City Star in further 
 commenting on our editorial of Mon- 
 day, June 18, says that there doubt- 
 less is graft, but that the Star has 
 a "weather eye" on Washington and 
 at the proper time when graft ap- 
 pears will go after it. 
 
 The substance of the Star's edi- 
 torial is that after the grafters have 
 gotten their money, robbed the gov- 
 ernment and plundered the treasury, 
 the Star will go after them, which, 
 of course, is entirely satisfactory to 
 the grafter. All he wants is to be 
 let alone now, while he is getting the 
 money. After that he can stand all 
 of the abuse and vituperation that 
 can be heaped upon him. 
 
 We remember some eight years 
 ago the editor of this paper made 
 a speech at Winfield, Kan., in which 
 he denounced Senator Aldrich's at- 
 titude on the tariff bill and illustrated 
 it by the duty on manufactured rub- 
 ber, which was controlled by a trust 
 and some members of Senator Al- 
 drich's family had stock in the trust. 
 The duty had been increased, as we 
 remem.ber about ten per cent when it 
 seemed to us that there should have 
 been a reduction instead of an in- 
 crease. 
 
 The Star printed several columii? 
 of our speech and commented in thci 
 most flattering manner on the cour- 
 age ?.nd ability with which we had 
 uncovered the rottenness of the tariff 
 bill. But criticism by us of a more 
 important character it now condemn.'. 
 
 A letter from a friend in Washing- 
 ton says that we have criticised too 
 
 soon; that we are putting the 
 grafters on notice that there may be 
 trouble ahead, and they are conceal- 
 ing their tracks, while if they had 
 been let alone they would have over- 
 played their hands. 
 
 Continuing, this gentleman, wao 
 has been connected with the United 
 States government for fifteen year? 
 and whose standing with all whc 
 know him is the highest, says: 
 
 "The greediest and cheapest set 
 of grafters that have ever disgraced 
 this country come from the souttt. 
 Do not expose them too early. Let 
 them play their game and when they 
 get a sufficient number. of cards on 
 the table so that they cannot sneak 
 them away, then we can go to it." 
 
 We may have been premature and 
 inexpedient. When in Washington 
 we saw the whole panorama and un- 
 dertook in a modest way to describe 
 it. As a reward for our efforts to 
 protect the people of this country 
 from a shameless lot of crooks, we 
 have been denounced from one end of 
 the nation to the other as a traitor 
 and guilty of treason. 
 
 After these grafters have obtained 
 their loot and are complacently en- 
 joying their plunder then the Star 
 will turn on them with a viciousness 
 that will be highly commendable and 
 by that time the public probably will 
 be ready to join in the attack; but 
 the Journal prefers to 'try to "prevent 
 the robbery than denounce it after 
 it is over. 
 
 When Aldrich was framing the 
 tariff bill, the Republicans who 
 against their own party organization 
 were demanding a square deal for 
 every interest, the public as well, 
 had the hearty support of. the Star; 
 but today when we demand honesty 
 in the administration of affairs, the 
 Star says hold on, we are at war; the 
 first thing to do is to get the Ger- 
 mans, and then we will get the 
 crooks. 
 
 If. it was wrong for Senator Al- 
 drich to increase the duty on rubber 
 when it was not needed and v.'hen 
 some of his family had stock in the 
 rubber trust, is it not wrong for the 
 present head of the aluminum trust 
 to be appointed as president of an 
 advisory board which passes upon 
 the purchases of aluminum by the 
 United States government and fixe? 
 
11 
 
 the price which the government shall 
 pay? 
 
 Is it also not dangerous for B. 
 M. Baruch, who confessed to making 
 some $476,000 on the turn of the 
 market due to the leak of President 
 Wilson's message to be given the pur- 
 chasing of all copper? 
 
 Is it right that the leading muni- 
 tion manufacturers of the country 
 should constitute a munition standard 
 board ? 
 
 Is it right that Edgar Palmer, 
 president of the New Jersey Zinc 
 Company should be> a member of the 
 sub-committee on zinc purchases by 
 the federal government? 
 
 Does the Star think it good admin- 
 istration to appoint the heads of 
 great manufacturing concerns to 
 supervise the purchases made by the 
 government from those concerns? 
 
 We do not. 
 
 THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 1917. 
 
 TAKE THE STEEL PLANT. 
 
 There is a great deal of just criti- 
 cism being made against the system 
 of distribution of food products of 
 the country. The average prices 
 which the producers received last 
 year were not abnormally high, but 
 the average prices which the con- 
 sumers had to pay were very exces- 
 sive. This has led to a practically 
 unanimous demand for legislation 
 giving the government authority to 
 regulate the distribution of these food 
 products; but the speculation in food, 
 products, so far as individual profits 
 go, is small as compared with the 
 enormous profits made by the steel 
 trust. 
 
 ■ The New York Evening Post of 
 June 18th, in discussing the tax bill, 
 had the following: 
 
 "The Steel Corporation earned 
 $104,000,000 in 1911, $108,000,000 in 
 1912, and $137,000,000 in 1913 making 
 an average of $116,000,000. In the 
 first quarter of this year the corpora- 
 tion earned $133,000,000, or at a rate 
 of $452,000,000 a year. It is now 
 estimated to be earning at a rate of 
 $520,000,000. Take the conservative 
 figure of $464,000,000, or an increase 
 of 300 per cent over the three-year 
 average. Ignoring the phrase, "and 
 the excess of last year," these earn- 
 ings bear a tax of 75 per cent on 
 
 the excess; the tax would be $261,- 
 000,000, leaving profits at $203,- 
 000,000." 
 
 In 1910 an investigation was 
 made as to the profits in steel. Steel 
 plates were then selling at $31 a ton, 
 and it appeared from this investiga- 
 tion that the Steel corporation was 
 making a profit of more than ten 
 per cent on its common stock at that 
 time, and when it is remembered that 
 all of the common stock of the steel 
 trust is watered stock and repre- 
 sents not a dollar of original invest- 
 ment, it looks as though such a profit' 
 ought to satisfy the greed of any 
 human being. 
 
 If any cd^cern can float hundreds 
 of millions of stock that represents 
 no invested capital and make more 
 than ten per cent per annum on such 
 stock, it certainly ought to be satis- 
 fied. But not so with the steel trust. 
 It appears that at $31 a ton, its earn- 
 ings were more than $100,000,000 a 
 year. It pushed the price up step by 
 step when the war came on until its 
 earnings became more than $500,000,- 
 000 a year. 
 
 It was during this period that it 
 was exhausting the resources of \.he 
 allies. The nations of Europe were 
 taxing their people to the limit of 
 their endurance and pouring a golden 
 stream into the coffers of these con- 
 scienceless exploiters. When finally 
 our country was drawn into the war, 
 this steel trust again boosted the 
 price of steel and demanded $96 per 
 ton. It actually sold some to the 
 United States government at that 
 price. 
 
 While the government is drafting 
 the young men of this nation, taking 
 them from their business and requir- 
 ing them to risk their lives and 
 health and future in the service of 
 the country, why should not it at 
 once seize the steel plants of the 
 United States Steel corporation, take 
 possession of them and operate them 
 in the interests of the public, con- 
 forming to the requirements of the 
 constitution and allowing the same 
 return on the -value of the property 
 that the government has to pay on 
 its securities. No other step should 
 be considered. Any* less drastic 
 action should not be tolerated. 
 
 This would not only protect the 
 government from the outrageous ex- 
 
12 
 
 tortions of this gang of highwaymen, 
 who are as criminal in their purposes 
 as any bandits who ever plundered 
 a town or robbed a bank, but it 
 would protect the people of the 
 United States front the oppressive 
 extortion which this trust is impos- 
 ing upon them in every industrial and 
 commercial activity. 
 
 FRIDAY, JUNE 29, 1917. 
 
 A NECESSARY PROVISION. 
 
 The food bill, which has been the 
 subject for such animated debates in 
 both the Senate and House, has been 
 re-written so we are advised by the 
 press dispatches from Washington. 
 Be it said to the honor of the com- 
 mittee that re-WTote it that they have 
 incorporated in it a provision of the 
 highest importance providing that "it 
 shall be unlawful for any person 
 acting as either a volunteer or paid 
 employee of the government, includ- 
 ing any advisory capacity to any 
 commission, board or council, to at- 
 tempt to procure or make any con- 
 tract for the purchase of any sup- 
 plies for the use of the government, 
 either from himself or from any firm 
 of which he is a member, or corpor- 
 ation of which he is an advisor or 
 stock-holder or in which he has any 
 financial interest." The penalties 
 provided are $10,000 fine and five 
 years imprisonment. 
 
 If this provision goes into effect, it 
 probably will • cause a scattering 
 among the present war boards or ad- 
 visory committees of numerous and 
 various kinds. Mr. Davis, who is the 
 head of the aluminum trust which 
 has sold to the government more 
 than a million canteens made at his 
 factory, will have to stop selling his 
 stuff to the government or cease as 
 a government agent to supervise such 
 purchases; and a number of other 
 men will have to withdi'aw from 
 their official capacities as purchasing 
 agents or supervisors of contracts 
 made with firms in which they have 
 financial interests. 
 
 But the astounding thing is that 
 congress should be required to legis- 
 late in regard to such a matter. The 
 boldness and amazing audacity of ap- 
 pointing men to positions where they 
 supervise the purchase of their own 
 products and fix the price which the 
 
 government shall pay for such prod- 
 ucts, is the most shocking thing in 
 connection with the present situation 
 tn Washington. 
 
 Senator Crane of Massachusetts re- 
 fused the position of secretary of the 
 treasury under the Taft administra- 
 tion, because he was largely inter- 
 ested in the paper mills that sold 
 supplies to the government. Senator 
 LaFollette refused to vote on the 
 tariff on zinc in the senate, because 
 he held stock in zinc mines. But no 
 such sensibilities seem to prevail in 
 Washington now. 
 
 The shocking thing is that in order 
 to protect the people of the United 
 States from the present situation a 
 committee of congress, a majority of 
 the members of which are adherents 
 of the political party in power, finds 
 it necessary to incorporate a pro- 
 vision in the law fixing heavy penal- 
 ties for such mal-administration of 
 public affairs as is now admittedly 
 going on. 
 
 MONDAY, JULY 9, 1917. ~ 
 
 "IT MAKES US TIRED." 
 
 One of the most amazing editorials 
 that has recently appeared in any 
 paper in the United States, was 
 printed on the front page of the Kan- 
 sas City Star last Friday, under the 
 head of "It Makes Us Tired." 
 
 In the article the Star commends 
 the policy of appointing the heads 
 of great trusts as committees to 
 pass upon purchases made from their 
 own factories. It apparently ap- 
 proves all the exploiting not only of 
 the people of the United States, but 
 also of the Allied nations by the in- 
 dustrial combinations of this country. 
 It approves the placing of Davis, 
 president of the aluminum trust, at 
 the head of a sub-committee which 
 passes on aluminum contracts and 
 purchases. 
 
 That the readers of the Journal 
 may understand the infamy of the 
 proposition, we quote the testimonv 
 of Mr. Davis before the house com- 
 mittee on foreign affairs. He told the 
 committee that his company con- 
 trolled the aluminum business of the 
 United States. Representative Por- 
 ter asked him whether the govern- 
 ment could make aluminum canteens 
 without "buying the aluminum from 
 
13 
 
 your factory?" to which Davis re- 
 plied, "No, sir." Porter asked Davis 
 how much actual cash had been put 
 into the aluminum trust by the 
 org-anizers and owners of all the 
 stock. His answer was, "I suppose 
 $3,000,000 or thereabouts." He was 
 asked what was the capital stock 
 now. He replied $20,000,000. When 
 asked the value of the plant, he said 
 $80,000,000. 
 
 We now quote from the Record: 
 
 Mr. Porter: The actual cash paid 
 in, not money from the profits ? 
 
 Mr. Davis: I suppose $3,000,000, or 
 thereabouts. 
 
 Mr. Porter: What dividend did you 
 pay last year? 
 
 Mr. Davis: Ten per cent on $20,- 
 000,000. 
 
 Mr. Porter: And the year preced- 
 ing? 
 
 Mr. Davis: Ten per cent, I think 
 it was. 
 
 Mr. Porter: Last year how much 
 of your profits did you apply to bet- 
 terment, in addition to paying the 
 10 per cent dividends ? 
 
 Mr. Davis: Practically all of the 
 balance. We have always paid very 
 small dividends, but I cannot remem- 
 ber off-hand the exact figures; but 
 for the first eight or ten years of 
 our existence we did not pay any 
 dividends at all. 
 
 Then Mr. Porter asked a long ques- 
 tion. He concluded by saying: 
 
 In other words, how much did you 
 make last year? 
 
 Mr. Davis: We made a little over 
 $20,000,000. 
 
 Mr. Porter: Last year? 
 
 Mr. Davis: Yes, sir. 
 
 Mr. Porter: You made about 100 
 per cent on the capital stock? 
 
 Mr. Davis: Yes, sir; and about 
 25 per cent on the investment. 
 
 Mr. Porter: You declared a' divi- 
 dend of 10 per cent? ^ 
 
 Mr. Davis: Yes, sir. 
 
 Mr. Porter: And 90 per cent, or 
 the balance, went into the better- 
 ment of your plant? 
 
 Mr. Davis: Yes, sir. 
 
 During the Roosevelt administra- 
 tion this trust pleaded guilty to vio- 
 lating the Sherman anti-trust law. 
 It paid its fine and continued to 
 
 operate its monopoly. Today its con- 
 trol is world-wide and since its com- 
 plete domination of the market its 
 profits have been fabulous. Davis 
 admits that last year his company 
 made a profit on the original invest- 
 ment of 666%. Yet today this man 
 is supervising the purchase of alum- 
 inum for this government and fixing 
 the price that it shall pay not only 
 for canteens, but for the aluminum 
 which goes into numberless other 
 articles, including the airplanes for 
 the construction of which congress 
 is now being asked to appropriate 
 $650,000,000. 
 
 But Davis is not the only one. 
 Farrell of the steel trust which is 
 making one-half billion a year out 
 of the war, is also on the advisory 
 committee, as is likewise, Ryan of 
 the copper trust, which is selling 
 to the government at sixteen cents 
 a pound copper which his company 
 produces at a cost of from four to 
 eight cents a pound, depending upon 
 the mine from which it is obtained. 
 Men representing concerns which 
 have been indicted or against which 
 suits are now pending for violating 
 the anti-trust laws of the nation are 
 holding important positions in the 
 government service. Yet when citi- 
 zens protest against this shameful 
 and dangerous condition they are 
 denounced as disloyal. 
 
 While the youth of America is 
 being drafted into the army, to 
 be sent into foreign lands and the 
 people are being oppressed with un- 
 precedented taxes, these captains of 
 high finance sit in the Munsey build- 
 ing at Washington and direct — at a 
 profit to themselves — the expenditure 
 of the billions which are being poured 
 into the war fund. 
 
 One of the first results of the war 
 will be the creation of the American 
 billionaire, for while the mills of 
 the war god grind out the lives of the 
 brightest of America's sons, they are 
 also grinding out gigantic fortunes 
 for the trust magnates. How long 
 a patriotic and intelligent people will 
 stand for this condition, time alone 
 can tell. 
 
 We must support our government, 
 but that does not mean that we 
 should tolerate such shocking mal- 
 administration of public affairs. 
 
14 
 
 WEDNE SDAY. JULY 11, 1917. 
 
 SHOULD BE PROTECTED IN HIS 
 RIGHT. 
 
 In our opinion the people of the 
 United States will not approve of the 
 administration's plan of suppressing 
 Socialist newspapers. According to 
 the press dispatches it appears that 
 it has assumed from the espionage 
 bill that it has a right to suppress 
 papers that do not believe that we 
 should have become involved in the 
 European war and a number of So- 
 cialist publications have been thrown 
 out of the mail. 
 
 We were given to understand, at 
 least by the press dispatches, that 
 the censorship provision in the 
 espionage bill had been cut out 
 completely. We never have been an 
 advocate of the Socialistic theory of 
 economic progress; but this is a 
 country of free speech, and the Post- 
 master General has no right to throw 
 out of the mails a publication because 
 he does not agree with its economic 
 views. To find an excuse in some 
 criticism of the present war policy 
 in order to persecute Socialistic pub- 
 lications, if it is kept up, will be 
 a most potential influence in creating 
 Socialists. 
 
 No man advocating unsound heresy 
 can succeed with an intelligent, self- 
 governing people. This is a govern- 
 ment in which public opinion is the 
 sovereign power. No administration 
 can live that does not conform to the 
 dictates of public opinion, and this 
 administration will find that if there 
 is one thing sacred to the American 
 people, yet it is the liberty of the 
 press, where criticisms can be in- 
 dulged in and where economic 
 theories can be expounded and the 
 responsibility for approving the good 
 and rejecting the bad is upon the 
 people themselves. 
 
 We deeply regret that the Post- 
 master General is disposed to perse- 
 cute Socialists. Up to this time 
 he probably has made as few errors, 
 as any of his predecessors, who 
 served in that capacity as long as 
 he has, but this one is the gravest 
 made by any postmaster general in 
 modern times. The Socialist ha§ the 
 same right to the use of the mail 
 r\? has the Democrat, Republican or 
 
 Prohibitionist. And he should be 
 protected in that right. 
 
 FRIDAY, JULY IsTlQlT. 
 
 WILL SOON BE SUPPORTING US 
 FULLY. 
 
 From the report of the speech 
 which Governor Capper made at Win- 
 field on July 9 that appeared in 
 the Topeka Capital the morning of 
 July 10, it appears that he is warn- 
 ing the people against graft in the 
 federal service and suggests that 
 some of the appointments that are 
 being made in Washington should be 
 closely scrutinized. 
 
 On July 5, the Topeka Daily Capi- 
 tal, owned and edited by the Gov- 
 ernor, made an attack upon the 
 critics of the Wilson administration, 
 plainly indicating that the criticism 
 was intended for the editor of the 
 Salina Journal and styled the graft 
 as mere "fly specks," asking the 
 people to overlook them in the in- 
 terests of the larger things of the 
 war. 
 
 When the editor of the Journal 
 wrote an article from Washington 
 that has created so much discussion, 
 the Governor promptly criticised him 
 for such expressions; and it is ex- 
 ceedingly gratifying now to us to 
 have the Governor in his mild and 
 placid way, practically confirm the 
 statement which he so recently criti- 
 cised us for making. After he has 
 more knowledge of the conditions 
 that prevail in Washington, he wib 
 be cordially supporting our proposi- 
 tion instead of criticising it, because 
 no man who has in any sense the 
 proper view of public service can 
 with any patience tolerate the reck- 
 less and chaotic extravagances that 
 are now permeating the military de- 
 partments of the United States gov- 
 ernment. 
 
 SATURDAY, JULY 14, 1917. 
 t 
 GIVE US ACTION INSTEAD OF 
 WORDS. 
 
 President Wilson, in his statement 
 issued this week, warned the trusts 
 and combinations that have, during 
 recent years, been exploiting the 
 American people and the nations of 
 the world, against a continuation of 
 such extortion. He expressed some 
 
15 
 
 very beautiful sentiment in his usual 
 admirable rhetoric. 
 
 If Mr. Wilson were the editor of 
 a newspaper and held no position of 
 authority in the g-overnment of the 
 United States, his address would be 
 I admirable and an object of universal 
 ,'. praise; but, being president of the 
 ' United States and in control of all 
 K the powerful agencies of the govern- 
 ment, it appears to us weak. What 
 the American people want now is 
 action, not words. , 
 
 The men in control of these power- 
 ful industrial enterprises are serving 
 in an advisory capacity to Mr. Wil- 
 son and his cabinet officers and con- 
 trolling contracts for the purchase of 
 materials which they themselves pro- 
 duce. It is within the power of- the 
 president to correct every evil against 
 which he warns these men. He has 
 under his direction the department 
 I of justice, the trade commission, and 
 other departments of government 
 :'ossessed with tremendous power. 
 
 He has now serving on these ad- 
 visory boards committees who de- 
 termine the material that is to ba 
 used and the prices paid in the con- 
 struction of battleships, merchant 
 ships, the manufacture of munitions 
 and war materials of every kind, men 
 who are interested in the industries 
 and who profit by the price. 
 
 A representative of the great lum- 
 ber combination is on the lumber 
 committee. Officers of the steel trust 
 I are advising as to the construction 
 I of battleships and merchant vessels. 
 Some of the concerns whose officers 
 are on these advisory committees 
 are under indictment and have cases 
 now pending against them in the 
 United States courts. 
 
 If the president will exercise his 
 great power and drive out these 
 money changers from the govern- 
 mental temples, prosecute with vigor 
 nnd send these culprits to jail, such 
 action will be much more enthusiasti- 
 cally received than the beautifill 
 phrases which he uses in warning 
 them. 
 
 TUESDAY. JULY 17, 1917. ~~ 
 
 SOME OF THE PROFITS OF WAR. 
 
 Secretary Lane, who, up to the time 
 he became secretary of the interior, 
 had made an admirable record as a 
 
 member of the Interstate Commerce 
 Commission, appointed by Mr. Roose- 
 velt and re-appointed by Mr. Taft, 
 has, since he became a member of 
 the present cabinet, seemed to feel 
 that it is his duty to defend every 
 act of the administration, right or 
 wrong. 
 
 He is now defending the advisory 
 council and says that the members 
 are not clothed with official authority 
 and cannot let contracts, which is 
 true; but nobody knows any better 
 than Secretary Lane that they con- 
 trol the contracts; that their advice 
 is accepted; and that the govern- 
 ment has rented elaborate quarters 
 in the Munsey building where these 
 captains of industry meet every day 
 with an army of governmental clerks 
 and pass upon the administrative af- 
 fairs of this government in the pur- 
 chase of materials of every character, 
 and that with rare exceptions their 
 recommendations are followed. 
 
 While they have no legal authority 
 to control prices, they do control 
 them and determine the quantities 
 and character of materials and the 
 prices that shall be paid. 
 
 If this advisory council were abol- 
 ished and some of the men compos- 
 ing it were compelled to defend them- 
 selves in the courts by a vigorous 
 prosecution of the cases which are 
 now pending against them, the Amer- 
 ican people would have more confi- 
 dence in the good purposes of this 
 administration. 
 
 If there is no graft or extortion on 
 the part of these monopolies, why 
 does the president warn them in one 
 sentence that they must bev/are, 
 and appeal to them in another, to 
 lay aside their avarice and be gov- 
 erned by patriotic impulses instead of 
 by an insatiable desire to pile up 
 added millions. 
 
 Consider for a moment some of 
 these profits as shown by their official 
 reports. 
 
 The net profits of the powder trust, 
 as shown by their annual reports for 
 the year 1914 were four million dol- 
 lars. Two years later, or for 1916, 
 these profits had advanced to 82 mil- 
 lion dollars, an increase in two years 
 of more than 2,000 per cent. 
 
 The profits of the steel trust in- 
 creased from approximately 100 mil- 
 lion dollars a year to 500 million dol- 
 
16 
 
 lars a year during the same period 
 of time. 
 
 The profits of the Swift Packing 
 company increased from nine mil- 
 lions to 20 million dollars during the 
 same period. The Armour Packing 
 company's profits increased from 
 seven million dollars to 20 million 
 dollars. 
 
 The Central Leather company, 
 commonly known as the leather trust, 
 increased its profits from four mil- 
 lion to 15 million dollars. 
 
 These great commercial and indus- 
 trial concerns, as a result of this war, 
 are amassing millions and millions of 
 dollars every month. This does not 
 come wholly from the sale of war 
 materials to the allied nations and 
 the United States, but partly from 
 the greatly increased ' price they 
 charge the American people for near- 
 ly everything they use. 
 
 Secretary Lane may continue to de- 
 fend these men and the president 
 may continue to make addresses, but 
 if that is all that is done these 
 men will continue to exploit the 
 American people. What is wanted, 
 we repeat, is not beautiful addresses 
 and charming language, but effective 
 action. 
 
 FRIDAY, JULY 20, 1917. ~ 
 
 PLUNGING TOWARD NATIONAL 
 BANKRUPTCY. 
 
 The senate has adopted an amend- 
 ment to the food bill making it un- 
 lawful for any parties interested in 
 contracts to have any position on an 
 advisory committee passing upon the 
 merits of such contracts, whether 
 they serve with or without pay. 
 
 The surprising thing is that such 
 legislation should be necessary in 
 order to prevent an administration 
 from putting in responsible positions 
 men interested in the profits of con- 
 tracts, the letting of which they 
 supervise. They, themselves, not only 
 represent their own interests, but 
 those of the government as well. 
 
 Since the United States entered 
 into the European war there has been 
 the most amazing condition existing 
 in Washington that ever existed 
 there in the history of this country. 
 With a brazenness shocking to man- 
 kind, men have been making millions 
 out of government contracts, which 
 
 they supervised, fixing the prices, de- 
 termining the materials and reap- 
 ing the rewards. 
 
 This scandal has become so offen- 
 sive that the senate, which is strong- 
 ly jjemocratic, last Wednesday, by an 
 overwhelming vote, amended the 
 food bill so as to forbid the continu- 
 ation of this practice. 
 
 The amendment, is involved and has 
 complicated phraseology. It seems to 
 be satisfactory to the grafters a.* 
 well as the senators who are opposed 
 to such practices, which casts sus- 
 picion upon the effectiveness of the 
 legislation. 
 
 From the foundation of this gov- 
 ernment down to the present time 
 there never has been any adminis- 
 tration so shameless in its method? 
 of plundering the public revenue. 
 You may search the history of man- 
 kind from the time of Roman pro- 
 fligacy down to the present hour and 
 you cannot find any organized gov- 
 ernment among the nations of the 
 earth, that has expended public 
 money with such reckless and crim- 
 inal extravagance as the present ad- 
 ministration has during the last six 
 months. 
 
 In wasting the money exacted 
 from the people by taxation, this ad- 
 ministration stands alone and un- 
 paralleled in the history of the 
 human race, and it seems from re- 
 ports from Washington this era of 
 profligacy has just begun. It is now 
 estimated that the expense of this 
 war during the first year is to be 
 more than 12 billions of dollars, 
 practically three times as much as 
 the cost of the conduct of the great 
 Civil war during the four years that 
 it continued. Unless there is a rad- 
 ical change before two more years 
 expire, we will be facing national 
 bankruptcy. 
 
 SATURDAY, JULY 21, 1917. 
 
 THE SHOE CONTRACTS DISTURB. 
 
 Senator Townsend of Michigan, a 
 conservative and courteous gentle- 
 man, became so overcome with in- 
 dignation in the senate debate on 
 July 17, that he declared a "host 
 of vultures are flocking to Washing- 
 ton to secure war contracts," and 
 Senator Kenyon, who has had quite a 
 friendlv leaning toward Mr. Wilson. 
 
17 
 
 severely oriticised the shoe contracts 
 let by the council of national de- 
 fense. 
 
 Why should Senator Kenyon criti- 
 cise the shoe contract? Is he not 
 aware that Mr. J. F. McElwain, pres- 
 ident of the W. H. McElwain com- 
 pany of Boston, that has seven shoe 
 factories, is the chairman of the com- 
 mittee on shoe and leather indus- 
 tries; and that John A. Bush, presi- 
 dent of the Brown Shoe company of 
 St. Louis, which last year more than 
 doubled its profits by charging war 
 prices; Charles P. Hall of the Amer- 
 ican Hide & Leather company of Bos- 
 ton, and W. G. Garrett of the Cen- 
 tral Leather company of Boston, are 
 also members of the committee? 
 
 The particular contract which 
 seems to have started the discussion 
 was one for 400,000 pairs of shoes, 
 which was let to Mr. McElwain at 
 fifteen cents per pair more than was 
 bid by a company not represented on 
 the committee. 
 
 Does the senator expect these high- 
 toned gentlemen who are serving 
 without pay to let contracts to them- 
 selves without a sufficient profit to 
 compensate them . for the time they 
 are "patriotically" devoting to the 
 service of the government? 
 
 As for Senator Townsend, we have 
 s always admired his courtesy and his 
 I inclination not to say anything that 
 would give pain or even discomfort 
 to anyone. However, instead of say- 
 ing that a "host of vultures are 
 flocking to Washington," he could 
 more fittingly have declared that a 
 host of vultures are in Washington 
 clothed with official authority by 
 Mr. Wilson and are devouring the 
 substance of the American people in 
 an orgy of public plunder and pillage 
 the like of which this country nor 
 any other has heretofor seen. 
 
 We respectfully call to the atten- 
 tion of the Kansas City Star, and the 
 Topeka State Journal and our 
 esteemed contemporary, the Topeka 
 Daily Capital, the stories of the con- 
 ditions in Washington that are now 
 being widely printed, and ask them 
 to join with us in an effort to stop 
 this orgy of waste and profligacy 
 which the present national adminis- 
 tration has turned loose upon the 
 ;"ountrv. 
 
 WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1917. 
 
 LOSING CONFIDENCE IN MR. 
 WILSON'S ADMINISTRATION. 
 
 Mr. Wilson in a letter to Repre- 
 sentative. Lever of the House of Rep- 
 resentatives demands that a provision 
 in the food bill for a committee tc 
 supervise the expenditures of the 
 war be eliminated and states that he 
 regards it as a vote of lack of con- 
 fidence in him. 
 
 Mr. Wilson demands absolute and 
 unqualified authority in all things 
 and resents congress assuming to ex- 
 ercise any of the functions which the 
 constitution of the United States pro- 
 vides that it shall. But as to con- 
 fidence in Mr. Wilson, if the presi- 
 dent will inquire from some of his 
 advisers as to why that provision 
 was incorporated into the bill, he 
 will learn that it was incorporated 
 because of the manner in which the 
 money which congress is voting is 
 being expended. 
 
 The president has appointed what 
 he calls an advisory council, which 
 in fact is passing on all contracts 
 which the government makes for war 
 materials. This council has a num- 
 ber of sub-committees, one of which 
 passes upon shoe contracts. Con- 
 tracts were recently let for shoes. 
 J. F. McElwain, president of the Mc- 
 Elwain Shoe company of Boston, 
 which has seven shoe factories, is a 
 member of the sub-committee on the 
 shoe purchases. His company was 
 given a contract for 100,000 pairs of 
 one grade of shoes at eight cents a 
 pair more than was asked by other 
 bidders, and 400,000 pairs of another 
 kind of shoes at 15 cents a pair more 
 than was bid by other firms. 
 
 Th^ Brown Shoe company of St. 
 Louis, whose president, John A. 
 Bush, is also a member of the same 
 sub-comrriittee was also given a con- 
 tract at a higher price than other 
 bidders were paid for the same shoes. 
 
 These shoe contracts simply illu- 
 strate what is going on in Washing- 
 ton. The same process is being fol- 
 lowed in the purchase of all the sup- 
 plies for the great army that is being 
 organized. The exposure of the graft 
 that is going on led to the incorpor- 
 ation of this provision in the bill. In 
 the debate there was the usual 
 
18 
 
 amount of oratory expended in ex- 
 tolling the patriotism of these men 
 who are ^making so many millions 
 out of contracts with the govern- 
 ment and in answer to one of these 
 criticisms Senator Borah said: 
 
 "There are those of us who oppose 
 the situation as it now exists, not 
 because we assail the individual in- 
 tegrity of these men, but because we 
 do not think it wise to start into 
 this war in violation of the great 
 underlying principle of honesty that 
 a man should not be permitted lo 
 contract with himself. It is true, as 
 the Senator says, that technically he 
 does not do that, but substantially 
 he does it. Let us assume for the 
 sake of the argument, that the gov- 
 ernment will suffer no actual financial 
 loss; let us accredit these men with 
 honesty and patriotism. Is not there 
 some way to avoid having a lot of 
 men selling millions of dollars of 
 property to the government upon 
 their own counsel- and advice?" 
 
 Can the president expect the people 
 to continue confidence in his adminis- 
 tration when such practices are pre- 
 valent everywhere. Moreover if 
 those trust magnates that have been 
 robbing the American people out of 
 millions for the last few years be- 
 cause of the European war are self- 
 sacrificing patriots they ought to 
 demonstrate that by turning into the 
 public treasury to help bear the bur- 
 dens of this war some of their ill- 
 gained wealth. Let them first dis- 
 gorge, beginning with the steel trust, 
 which made approximately $500,000,- 
 000 last year, the powder trust which 
 made over $80,000,000, and the lesser 
 ones. 
 
 JULY 28. 1917. ~ . 
 
 FOOD BILL AFFECTS GREAT 
 KANSAS INDUSTRY. 
 
 There is a great deal "of appre- 
 hension among the farmers of the 
 country as to the effect the food bill 
 will have on the price of wheat, and 
 we think that there are abundant 
 grounds for such concern. 
 
 Wheat is selling now in Central 
 Kansas for around $2.40 a bushel. If 
 the government fixes the minimum 
 price at $1.75 or $2 a bushel, there is 
 grave danger that the buyers will 
 take that as a government sanction 
 
 and not pay more fearing chat the 
 margin which they will be permitted 
 to have for handling the grain will 
 be fixed upon the basis of the $1.75 
 or $2 a bushel. 
 
 The speculator, if he thinks he can 
 sell wheat for $3 later on, will take 
 his chances and bid up for the wheat. 
 If he believes he is going to be re- 
 quired to sell at a margin slightly 
 above that which he pays and the 
 government fixes the price at $1.75 
 or $2, there is a possibility that he 
 will consider the price which the 
 government fixes as a government 
 price and hesitate to go beyond that 
 Of course, this is simply specula- 
 tion. It may not be realized. The 
 buyer may continue to pay more than 
 the minimum price fixed. There is 
 nothing to prevent him from paying 
 more except the apprehension that 
 he will not be permitted to sell it 
 for much more than that by the food 
 commission upon tne grounds that a 
 fair margin over the minimum price 
 fixed by the government is rea- 
 sonable. 
 
 Ordinarily $2 is an excessive price 
 for wheat in this western country. 
 In the eastern part of the United 
 States it is not any more than it 
 costs to raise it and there wheat is 
 only grown because it is necessary 
 for a rotation of crops not because 
 it is profitable. However, taking into 
 consideration the loss due to failure 
 in Kansas, considering the state as 
 a whole, with the price the farmers 
 are now being compelled to pay for 
 everything they buy, there is no more 
 profit in $2 a bushel now than there 
 was in 90c or $1 wheat before the 
 war began. 
 
 If you applied the same system of 
 accounting to the business of farm- 
 ing that is applied by the corpora- 
 tions when they are demanding a 
 reasonable profit on their products, 
 wheat would not be less than $1.50 
 a bushel, in normal times. 
 
 A great complaint is made by the 
 theoretical economists of the country 
 about the desertion of the American 
 farm and a movement has been agi- 
 tated for years to get men to go back 
 to the farm. "Back to the farm" has 
 been the cry, but it has not worked. 
 The young men leave the farm at the 
 first opportunity, because they can 
 find more lucrative employment el~€- 
 
19 
 
 vvhere, and as a man said to me not 
 ong ago, "I intend to quit the farm 
 -xnd go to town because I can earn 
 I living a great deal easier there 
 ihan 1 do here." 
 
 We do not know what the effect of 
 this food bill may be, but if it is in- 
 tended to keep down the price of 
 farm products while the prices of 
 other commodities are soaring to the 
 iky, it will be a disastrous piece of 
 legislation. We have not opposed it 
 because we can see some elements of 
 good in it. If properly adminis- 
 tered, it can be very useful to the 
 people of the United States. If im- 
 properly administered, it will become 
 a burden upon American agriculture 
 and a grave injustice to the produc- 
 ing element of our population. 
 
 I sympathize with the apprehension 
 of the farmer, but trust that this ap- 
 prehension may not be realized. 
 Somehow or other I , feel that we 
 need niore wisdom in the adminis- 
 tration of our government at Wash- 
 ington. Abraham Lincoln was presi- 
 dent of the United States during the 
 greatest crisis our nation has ever 
 gone through. We had a terrible war 
 devastating our country. More than 
 one-third of the states were in open 
 rebellion. It was a long and bloody 
 conflict lasting four years, but he 
 guided the destinies of our country 
 and asked for no such power as Mr. 
 Wilson is asking congress to give 
 him. He sought no arbitrary con- 
 trol of the ordinary business transac- 
 tions of the people and if we only 
 had that homely wisdom and sound 
 common sense of Abraham Lincoln 
 at the helm of the nation now, we 
 would feel much more secure than we 
 can under the present conditions. 
 What we need in public life today 
 is more sound common sense and less 
 theory, more inherent honesty and 
 less greed, more real patriotism and 
 less arrogant bombastic declamation. 
 
 THURSDAY, AGUGUST 2, 19177~ 
 
 "SOMEWHERE IN FRANCE." 
 
 We received a clipping from a 
 friend in a western county, from a 
 published letter of one of the Ameri- 
 can soldiers in France to his mother. 
 The headline was "Somewhere in 
 Prance." He is not permitted to 
 let his mother know where he is. 
 
 Nothing could illustrate the super- 
 ficial gullibility of the present officers 
 of the war department any more than 
 such a headline — as though it were 
 possible for the American govern- 
 ment to conceal the location of 
 American troops from the command- 
 ers of the German army. 
 
 There "never has been a war of any 
 consequence when all nations in- 
 volved have not been able success- 
 fully to locate the armies of their 
 opponents. The secretary of the 
 navy was indignant to think that the 
 officers of the German navy knew 
 where the American fleet was and 
 were able to attack it with sub- 
 marines. If he had the ordinary in- 
 formation which an American high 
 school boy ought to have, he would 
 have known that any civilized govern- 
 ment of any consequence engaged in 
 war first organized its lines of com- 
 munication so as to have perfect 
 knowledge of the movement of the 
 enemy; but the silliest thing is to 
 refuse to permit boys, who have been 
 sent to France to take part in this 
 European war, to let their mothers 
 know what part of the republic they 
 are located in, as though a letter 
 written back home, telling where a 
 soldier is located, would be valuable 
 information to the German army. 
 
 It is very unfortunate that in 'the 
 great crisis through which the Amer- 
 ican government is passing that we 
 have not men in control of the great 
 departments of the government, who 
 are broad-minded and endowed with 
 the profound common sense required 
 to understand the movements of the 
 affairs of the world and of nations 
 as well as the natui'e of the Ameri- 
 can people. 
 
 When Germany is defeated, as we 
 believe she ultimately will be, it will 
 be done by a powerful organized 
 military force and not by such kin- 
 dergarten strategy as the present of- 
 ficers of the war department are en- 
 gaged in. In the other wars in which 
 our- government has been involved, 
 and which it has succrssfully fought, 
 it was not a crime for a soldier to 
 write home and tell where he was. 
 
 There is an additional illustration 
 of the size of the administrative of- 
 ficers now in charge of the govern- 
 ment; namely, the action of George 
 Creel, the official censor of the state 
 
20 
 
 department, in withholding informa- 
 tion from the American public as to 
 an attack by submarines upon the 
 American fleet, until he could write 
 it up in his own style, coloring and 
 distorting the facts, so that he could 
 make what he believed would be a 
 good Fourth of July story and feed 
 it out to the American press. 
 
 To show the wisdom and far- 
 sighted sagacity of this man Creel, 
 he refused to let the American people 
 know where the attack was made 
 upon their fleet, because he did not 
 want the Germans to know about it. 
 Since the Germans had discovered the 
 fleet and attacked it and were suc- 
 cessfully driven off, we presume that 
 he supposes that the officers of the 
 German fleet of submarines will con- 
 ceal from their government the 
 whereabouts of the American fleet, 
 or even refuse to tell where it was 
 when they found it. But this piece 
 of intelligent censorship on the part 
 of Mr. Creel is in keeping with the 
 whole policy of the present adminis- 
 tration of our national affairs. 
 
 Heretofore the dispatches of the 
 American navy have been printed 
 when received so that the American 
 people could know what their army 
 and navy were doing; but now our 
 government looks upon the people 
 in a different light from that in 
 which they have been regarded by the 
 administrations of the past. It is not 
 thought safe to give them informa- 
 tion or the facts as they are, but 
 they must be fixed up according to 
 the notion of some newspaper cor- 
 respondent in the state department as 
 to what he thinks will be good for 
 them to have. 
 
 We suppose from now on during 
 this war this official pabulum will be 
 cooked up in the state department 
 and 'handed out at convenient sea- 
 sons. The American people may 
 stand for this for a time, but not for 
 a great while. 
 
 SATURDAY, AUGUST 4. 1917. ~ 
 
 CRITICISM A DUTY. 
 
 A Salina alleged Republican has 
 severely assailed the editor of the 
 Journal for his criticism of the pres- 
 ent national administration, upon the 
 theory that this is no time to criticise 
 the government. He inquired of a 
 
 friend of ours why we did not com- 
 mend the government instead of criti- 
 cising it. It is a source of deep re- 
 gret that we are not able to com- 
 mend the present management of our 
 government. It certainly would be 
 more pleasant for us to do so than . 
 to criticise, but we cannot conscien- 
 tiously commend that which is not 
 worthy of commendation; and criti- 
 cism in times like these is of the 
 highest importance. He who still 
 calls attention to the shortcomings 
 of this administration, and thereby 
 helps to avoid a repetition of th»» 
 blunders that have been made renders 
 the greatest public service. 
 
 If it had not been for the criticism 
 that has been levelled against Mr. 
 Wilson, this infamous advisory com- 
 mission of the council of national de- 
 fense, which marks probably the most 
 disgraceful episode in the history of 
 our government so far as the pur- 
 chase of government supplies is con- 
 cerned, would still be in force, and 
 men like Arthur V. Davis of the 
 aluminum trust, John A. Bush, presi- 
 dent of the Brown Shoe Company, 
 J. F. McElwain of the McElwain 
 Company, James A. Ferrell, president 
 of the United States Steel corpor- 
 ation, and J. D. Ryan of the Ana- 
 conda Copper company would still be 
 advising as to the contracts and fix- 
 ing the prices which their companies 
 are to receive from the government 
 for their own wares. 
 
 Criticism has resulted in the aban- 
 donment of at least the form of the 
 graft which has been so manifest. 
 Criticism caused the war department 
 to change the per cent which those '' 
 who are erecting cantonments are to 
 receive from ten per cent to 7 per 
 cent of the cost of construction. A? 
 it is working out, this change may 
 not be very desirable and may merit 
 greater criticism than the former* 
 method, because the war department 
 permits each one of these contractors 
 building these cantonments a maxi- 
 mum of $250,000 as compensation. 
 That is *to be the maximum he can 
 earn and in order to get the $250,000. 
 he may ru^ the expense up sufficient- 
 ly to make seven per cent aggregate 
 the maximum allowance which he can 
 receive, so it really may have been 
 cheaper to have paid the ten per cent 
 Then it would not have been neces- 
 
21 
 
 sary for the cantonments to have cost 
 go much, in order for the contractor 
 to get the $250,000, and from the 
 methods employed by these men they 
 all seem bent upon getting the maxi- 
 mum allowance. 
 
 Two hundred and fifty thousand 
 dollars makes a pretty good fortune 
 for the ordinary man and if the con- 
 tractor for each one of these canton- 
 ments makes that amount in a few 
 months' time, without any risk, as the 
 government has the national treasury 
 to draw on for the payment of all of 
 these bills at whatever price the con- 
 tractor sees fit to pay, it is a pretty 
 soft snap for the contractor, so the 
 reduction of the rate per cent from 
 ten to seven ultimately may result 
 in an increase of the expense to the 
 government. 
 
 The perfidy, however, is in the sys- 
 tem the war department is using in 
 order to construct these cantonments. 
 It was not necessary to use the 
 methods followed, it was simply de- 
 sirable to a lot of grafters and they 
 seem to be in control in national af- 
 fairs. 
 
 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1917~ 
 
 AN OUTRAGE. 
 
 The editor of the Journal, while re- 
 cently in Washington, was called 
 upon by the husband of one of the 
 suffragists who have been arrested 
 for picketing. He made a bitter com- 
 plaint against the treatment his wife 
 was receiving in the work-house of 
 the District of Columbia. He seems 
 to be a responsible business man of 
 Chicago, whose wife is an ardent and 
 enthusiastic suffragette. 
 
 Able lawyers declare that these 
 women committed no violation of the 
 law — that when they were arrested 
 for obstructing the sidewalk, if legal- 
 ly held, it was upon an extreme tech- 
 nicality, and that their incarceration 
 is arbitrary and tyrannical. But Mr. 
 Watson, of Chicago, declared that 
 his wife was rudely treated, kept in 
 filthy surroundings, compelled to eat 
 unwholesome food and that the chief 
 officer and his assistant were insult- 
 ing and abusive to these women pris- 
 oners. Many of them are women of 
 refinement. They are enthusiastic 
 and believe they are martyrs to a 
 righteous cause. They sxiffer indig- 
 
 nity and imprisonment for opinion's 
 sake and nothing else. 
 
 Their incarceration is in line with 
 the actions of the former czar ol 
 Russia, when he sent thousands of 
 political prisoners to the jails and 
 banished them to the wilds of Siberia. 
 While we are fighting for the liberty 
 of the world in the European war, we 
 seem to lose sight of the fact that 
 the liberties of the American people 
 are fast being sacrificed by an arbi- 
 trary tyranny, the like of which 
 would never have been tolerated in 
 any other period of American history. 
 
 There is enthroned in Washington 
 today an arrogant autocracy, whose 
 counterpart the American people have 
 never heretofore known and the awful 
 catastrophe that confronts the nation 
 as a result of the European war, so 
 appalls thinking people that they 
 pass by with little notice the outrages 
 that are being committed on these, 
 it may be, over enthusiastic cham- 
 pions of the suffrage cause. 
 
 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 19177 
 
 MR. RIPLEY'S EFFUSION. 
 
 Mr. E. P. Ripley, president of the 
 Santa Fe, in a letter to the Chicago 
 Tribune made a violent attack upon 
 the Public Utilities Commission of 
 Kansas because it refused to in- 
 crease the minimum car load weight 
 for grain and grain products from 
 24,000 pounds to 40,000 pounds. !n 
 this letter among other things he 
 said: 
 
 "When it is considered that the 
 average equipment of today will 
 carry about 60,000 and most of it 
 80,000 pounds and over, the minimum 
 of 24,000 pounds which the state of 
 Kansas refuses to advance is nothing 
 less than an outrage upon investors, 
 a gross discrimination against ship- 
 pers furnishing large loads, and in 
 this time of war such an 'aid and 
 comfort' to the enemy as to be really 
 treasonable." 
 
 Mr. Ripley seems to think that the 
 only business of the common carrier 
 is to earn returns for the stock- 
 holders and provide equipment for 
 large shippers. The fact that the 
 majority of the freight cars will 
 carry from 60,000 to 80,000 pounds 
 has practically little bearing upon the 
 action of the Kansas Commission 
 
22 
 
 which he so severely criticises. The 
 railroads are operated for the pur- 
 pose of serving the public. The com- 
 mercial conditions that exist in Kan- 
 sas are such that any material in- 
 crease in the minimum car load 
 weights from 24,000 pounds wouid 
 seriously interfere with the normal 
 commercial operations of the people. 
 It is not practicable to load every 
 car to its capacity. Where it is 
 practicable to load cars to their ca- 
 pacity shippers are urged to do so, 
 but a railroad should be required to 
 provide equipment to properly servp- 
 the commerce of the state and com- 
 munities which it is chartered to 
 serve. The smaller communities are 
 worthy of, and entitled to, considera- 
 tion as well as the railroad. The 
 commercial and industrial condition 
 of the people is one of the important 
 factors in all transportation questions 
 and is of greater importance than 
 the character of the equipment which 
 the railroad has acquired. If the 
 railroad has not equipment proper 
 for the service required of it, then 
 it should obtain it. That is one of 
 its obligations. We have no doubt 
 that the 60,000 pound and 80,000 
 pound cars are very useful in hand- 
 ling through traffic where long dis- 
 tances are to be covered and heavy 
 commodities are to be carried, but 
 it is just as important that the 
 smaller communities that cannot use 
 such large quantities of the commod- 
 ities necessary for their existence and 
 welfare shall be able to get reasona- 
 ble rates on smaller car load lots, 
 and the Commission was mindful of 
 the interests of the people of the 
 state as well as the carrier when it 
 issued the order. 
 
 It would be well for Mr. Ripley 
 and other railroad magnates to real- 
 ize that they are servants of th^ 
 public and not masters of mankind, 
 and it would be far better taste for 
 them to use judgment and sense in 
 discussing questions that concern 
 their interests as well as those of 
 the public and not indulge in the 
 usual billingsgate which cheap graft- 
 ers and politicians use in accusing 
 everybody of treason who may do 
 something that is not exactly to their 
 taste or in harmony with their no- 
 tions. For the president of a rail- 
 road company that is making enor- 
 
 mous dividends and amassing millions 
 upon millions of surplus ^s a result 
 of this war and the sufferings of 
 the people to accuse a public body 
 of treason because it demands that 
 railroads render a proper service to 
 the communities which are bearing' 
 the burdens of the war and sharing 
 none of the profits, is at least a re 
 flection upon his good sense and sin- 
 cerity of purpose. 
 
 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1917. 
 
 A MATTER OF SELF DEFENSE. 
 
 The Topeka papers last week had 
 rather a sensational article upon the 
 organization of the Farmers' Non- 
 partisan League in Kansas, stating 
 that it was a movement of the I. W. 
 W. and was being promoted by Ger- 
 man influence. It is customary novf 
 for the partisans of this administra- 
 tion and the defenders of its war 
 policy to accuse everyone of treason 
 who is not a sub-servient votary of 
 the existing order of things and to 
 denounce them as pro-German. If 
 the authors of the articles that ap- 
 peared in Topeka papers had given a 
 little attention to this movement thej 
 would have known that the Non- 
 partisan League which is being or- 
 ganized by the farmers throughout 
 the western states is a great move- 
 ment in the interest of the farming 
 industry in the United States. 
 
 In the Dakotas and other north- 
 western states, it is already power- 
 ful and exerting a beneficial in- 
 fluence upon the public affairs of 
 those commonwealths. The purpose 
 of the Non-partisan League is to 
 elect men to office who will give the 
 farmer a square deal and not be con- 
 trolled by organized wealth and other 
 organizations that are unfriendly to 
 the agricultural interests, or who 
 seek to exploit the farmer and his 
 products for financial gain; in such 
 an organization seems to be about 
 the only hope left for the farmers of 
 the west. Practically all of the legis- 
 lation affecting commerce and indus- 
 try that has been enacted in the last 
 few years in Washington has been 
 in the interest of dealers in farm 
 products, manufacturers and business 
 men instead of agriculture. The 
 present food bill in its operations ha.<? 
 accomplished nothing up to date ex- 
 
23 
 
 cept to hold down the price of wheat 
 below what it would have been if 
 such bill had not been passed. If 
 everything- which the farmer is com- 
 pelled to buy was controlled by the 
 same agency and the prices held 
 down in the same manner, he would 
 have no cause of complaint, but when 
 the things which he buys are ad- 
 vancing in price without limitation 
 and the prices of the products which 
 he has to sell are kept down, as a 
 matter of self defense it becomes 
 necessary for him in some way to 
 seek protection. As we understand 
 the Non-partisan League it is in 
 substance a pledge on the part of 
 the farmer to support for office can- 
 didates who will in his judgment best 
 
 epresent the farming interests^ 
 
 For forty years the railroads, 
 manufacturing concerns, labor organ- 
 izations and other lines of industry 
 and business have had organizations 
 for the purpose of influencing legis- 
 lation to the inteuest of their own 
 lines of industry and business, why 
 should not the farmer. The news- 
 papers that are now so tender and 
 solicitous of the welfare of the rail- 
 roads are horrified when the farmers 
 
 )i the country propose to organize a 
 Non-partisan League the purpose of 
 which is to support candidates for 
 office who will give their business the 
 attention it deserves in the legisla- 
 tion of the nation. This movement 
 is different- from the old Populist 
 movement which was the organiza- 
 tion of a political party. As we un- 
 derstand the Non-partisan League is 
 not a political party. Its members 
 may support a Democart; or a Re- 
 publican; or a Socialist. That will 
 depend upon what the candidate 
 stands for and existing conditions 
 are forcing the farmers into such 
 organizations in self defense. 
 
 THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1917. 
 
 IS SLOWLY ADMITTING THE 
 TRUTH. 
 
 The Kansas City Star has discov- 
 ered that the war department let a 
 contract for a large number of sash 
 for windows in the cantonments and 
 then, after the sash had been made, 
 discovered that there was no glass of 
 the size required by these sash, and 
 
 that it would be cheaper to throw 
 the sash away or burn them up and 
 have others made than to have glass 
 made to fit the odd sizes. 
 
 This is one of a number of gross 
 mistakes which have come to the 
 Star's attention and leads it to de- 
 mand that a board be appointed to 
 supervise the work of cabinet officers 
 so as to protect the government from 
 such reckless waste and extravagance, 
 if not corruption. 
 
 Has the Star any evidence that 
 satisfies it that the contractors for 
 the cantonments were not perfectly 
 agreeable to having large, wasteful 
 expenditures made? They get their 
 per cent just the same. If there was 
 a half million dollars wasted in that 
 way they would get their seven or 
 ten per cent commission on it just 
 the same as though it had been wise- 
 ly and properly expended. 
 
 The Star knows, if it were frank 
 enough to admit it, that the whole 
 administration of the government's 
 affairs for the last six months has 
 been one of incompetence, extrava- 
 gance and corruption beyond descrip- 
 tion. Yet it has defended the out- 
 rageous waste at Fort Riley. It has 
 denounced vehemently the editor of 
 the Journal, because months ago he 
 called the attention of the country to 
 these facts. After weary months the 
 Star and the Capital and other 
 papers that were acquiessing in the 
 demand that the editor of this paper 
 be sent to jail for exposing grafl 
 and rottenness in public affairs ar& 
 now feebly suggesting that thess' 
 things be stopped, but fail to fix ox- 
 attempt to fix the responsibility for 
 the malfeasance. 
 
 In due time they will be denounc- 
 ing the awful blunder of sending our 
 soldiers on the battlefields with de- 
 fective ammunition and demanding 
 that those guilty of such abhorrent 
 neglect or malfeasance be punished 
 summarily. 
 
 These metropolitan papers have 
 made some progress. They are now 
 printing extracts from the speeches 
 of Hiram Johnson, Senator LaFollette 
 and others and actually commending 
 the attitude of these patriotic sena- 
 tors in their efforts to compel the 
 men who are making millions out of 
 this war to pay a fair share of their 
 
24 
 
 war profits into the treasury of the 
 "federal government. 
 
 In the morning- issue of September 
 7, the Capital conceded that Wall 
 Street was controlling the legislation 
 of the nation, so far as the tax bill 
 was concerned; but the editor of that 
 paper is too intelligent not to know 
 that it has controlled the legislation 
 of this country in every movement 
 from a period antedating the declar- 
 ation of war. 
 
 FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 14. 19177 
 
 WHERE DOES MR. 
 STAND. 
 
 WILSON 
 
 In the great fight which a group 
 of senators made in Washington for 
 an equitable tax upon war profits, 
 they outlined an issue which will be 
 carried into many states of the Union 
 in the next campaign. 
 
 In this debate Senator Hiram John- 
 son declared that the drafting of the 
 young men of the country and the 
 exemption of excessive war profits 
 was a crime against the manhood of 
 the nation. Senator LaFollette in a 
 great speech that lasted for three 
 hours graphically portrayed the in- 
 famy of the legislation. On the last 
 day Senator Borah who is one of the 
 strong orators of the present con- 
 gress declared that the people would 
 not tolerate tenderness toward the 
 profits of speculators in the flesh and 
 blood of the nation. 
 
 These senators, in as righteous a 
 cause as was ever championed by free 
 men, lost and. when they lost, wrong 
 triumphed. The Journal enquires, 
 where was Mr. Wilson while these 
 men were making such a gallant fight 
 for human rights? 
 
 When the declaration of war was 
 before Congress Mr. Wilson appeared 
 and called for its immediate passage 
 and denounced, as treasonable, op- 
 position to it. When the bill for the 
 drafting of young men into the army 
 to be sent to foreign lands was pend- 
 ing Mr. Wilson was there demanding 
 its enactment. When the fight is 
 made to conscript wealth — to take a 
 reasonable portion of the war profits 
 from the munition vendors and those 
 who are amassing great wealth as 
 a direct result of the war — Mr. Wil- 
 son is silent and Democratic senators 
 such as Gore of Oklahoma and Hollis 
 
 of New Hampshire who stood with 
 Johnson and LaFollette and Borah 
 are being branded as traitors to the 
 administration. Senator Gore is 
 being threatened with defeat in his 
 campaign for re-election because he 
 insists that men who are making for- 
 tunes out of this awful conflict shall . 
 bear a just portion of the burdens 
 of taxation. War journals are ridi- 
 culing these patriotic men. but when 
 the people come to understand the 
 real issues involved in this fight they 
 will be overwhelmingly sustained. 
 
 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1917? 
 
 WILL BE THE VICTIMS. 
 
 Mr. Hoover the sole achievement of 
 whose official efforts since he began 
 operating in the United States has 
 been to reduce the price of the 
 farmers' wheat fifty or sixty cents 
 per bushel, now proposes to take hold 
 of the packing situation. He evi- 
 dently thinks that the farmers are 
 receiving too much for their live 
 stock. 
 
 In his first proceeding he guar- 
 anteed to the millers and the manu- 
 facturers of wheat products a higher 
 profit than they ordinarily expect to 
 obtain. Then he fixed the maximum 
 amount at which wheat should be 
 sold, making the dealers in wheat 
 safe from loss and imposing all risk 
 upon the producers. Kansas will 
 have this year, so our State Agricul 
 tural Department says, about forty 
 million bushels of wheat. Consider- 
 ing our acreage on an average crop 
 we should have had three times that 
 amount. Following the lines of ac- 
 counting that are applied to every 
 other business, it has cost the wheat 
 producers of Kansas this year from 
 $2.00 to $2.50 per bushel to produce 
 every bushel of wheat that has been 
 raised and probably it has cost the 
 people of the United States on an 
 average fully $2.00 or niore, so that 
 Mr. Hoover has said to the Ameri- 
 can farmer that he should not have 
 more than cost and in many cases 
 less than cost for his product, but 
 that the man who handles the 
 product after it leaves the farm 
 should be guaranteed a safe and de- 
 sirable profit. The result is that 
 the consumers of bread are passing 
 exactly the same as they did before 
 
the price of wheat was reduced and 
 when he begins to operate ' on the 
 meat market the livestock men of 
 this state may expect a reduction in 
 the price of livestock but the con- 
 sumers of packing house products 
 will never know from the prices they 
 pay that a reduction has been made. 
 We were somewhat apprehensive 
 before this food bill was passed as to 
 its effect. We had already had an 
 example of the voluntary services 
 of millionaires such as Mr. Hoover 
 planned to call around him in the 
 advisory board which the President 
 called together in Washington at the 
 beginning of the war. From the date 
 these men met to the present time 
 they have been exploiting the Amer- 
 ican people for their own gain in 
 the most high-handed and infamous 
 manner that jj^s ever been practiced 
 in the history of civilized nations. 
 We have frequently described in the 
 Journal their methods and when Mr. 
 Hoover calls together the American 
 captains of industry to help in ad- 
 ministering the food law, we may 
 expect the men who have amassed 
 enormous fortunes from dealing in 
 farm products of the United States to 
 control the policy of the food ad- 
 ministration and the victims of their 
 avarice will be the American farmer 
 and the consumer of small means. 
 
 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 19177 
 
 WILL NOT BE SO EASILY MIS- 
 LEAD. 
 
 Every political grafter who has his 
 hands into the United States Treas- 
 ury and wants to distract attention 
 from his criminal operations declares 
 that he is helping the United States 
 to win the war and denounces as un- 
 patriotic criticism of his methods. 
 Every railroad that wants to avoid 
 giving the people proper service or 
 to increase its rates and impose upon 
 public credulity raises the cry that it 
 is doing its bit to win the war and 
 the public must help it. Every dema- 
 gogic politician who is the hand-tool 
 of predatory wealth and special in- 
 terests frantically declares that he 
 is determined to do his bit in help- 
 ing win the war. Every metropoli- 
 tan newspaper that is a friend of 
 special privilege or controlled by 
 Wall Street capital is widely calling 
 
 upon the public to overlook extrava- 
 gances and if need be, corruption in 
 public affairs, that we may win the 
 war. The munition vendors and 
 beneficiaries of army contracts who 
 are amassing millions out of the ex- 
 travagances of the present adminis- 
 tration, are vehemently declaring that 
 they are determined to do their bit 
 in winning the war and when pa- 
 triotic public servants like Senators 
 Johnson of California, Borah of 
 Idaho, LafoUette of Wisconsin, Gore 
 of Oklahoma, and Hollis of New 
 Hampshire, demand that they give a 
 reasonable amount of their exclusive- 
 ly war profits to sustain the govern- 
 ment in the financial crisis which it is 
 rapidly approaching, they denounce 
 them as traitors. 
 
 If this war is won it will be by 
 the sacrifices of the rank and file of 
 the American people, not only of 
 their blood, but of their substance, 
 and the most infamous thing in 
 American history is the exhibition 
 now going on in Washington in which 
 the grafters and politicians are work- 
 ing in absolute accord. What this 
 country needs is more men in public 
 life like Johnson and his co-workers 
 and fewer sniveling time servers like 
 Helvering of this district and Shouse 
 of the seventh. Here at home the 
 state is full of politicians of the same 
 type who hope to obtain further polit- 
 ical honors by pleasing the exploiters 
 of the nation's wealth and blood 
 without letting the people find it out. 
 They think they are fooling the rank 
 and file of our population. We • be- 
 lieve, however, that the sturdy com- 
 mon sense of the citizen of this state 
 will assert itself in the next election 
 and that they will not be so mislead 
 by high sounding phrases and hypo- 
 critical pretense as they were last 
 year. 
 
 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1917. 
 
 THE MOST PATRIOTIC SERVICE. 
 
 The Journal has severely criticised 
 the incompetence, profligacy and cor- 
 ruption that now prevails in the ad- 
 ministration of our national affairs. 
 Almost every day we are met with 
 this statement: "We believe what 
 you say is true, but you ought not 
 to say it now, because we are at war 
 and any criticism of the Government 
 
26 
 
 encourages the enemy." In other 
 words, it is contended that when our 
 country is involved in war it is not 
 expedient to denounce gi-aft and cor- 
 ruption in public affairs. 
 
 We do not believe that these 
 friends realize the purport of their 
 attitude. It means that during a 
 state of war profligacy, extravagance 
 and dishonesty can run rampant in 
 government affairs, and he who ex- 
 poses it, and not the thief is the pub- 
 lic enemy. 
 
 We cannot concur in this view. 
 The man who cheats the government 
 in time of war, who takes advantage 
 of the conflict that is now going on 
 among the nations of the earth to rob 
 the public, should be executed as a 
 traitor to his country, and the men 
 who expose the graft and rottenness, 
 instead of being abused for it, ought 
 to be commended by every good 
 citizen. 
 
 To illustrate. A contract has been 
 let to three companies for the manu- 
 facture of rifles. Technically, it was 
 approved by the Secretary of War 
 upon the recommendation of General 
 Crozier. According to the testimony 
 of both the Secretary of War and 
 General Crozier, it was in fact ap- 
 proved by them upon the recom- 
 mendation of the Council of Na- 
 tional Defense, headed by Mr. Scott 
 of Cleveland, 0, 
 
 This Council for National Defense 
 recommended, and it was approved 
 by the Secretary of War, that these 
 companies, the Remington Arms 
 Company, the Remington Arms- 
 Union Metallic Cartridge Company, 
 and the Winchester Repeating Arms 
 Company, be given the contract to 
 manufacture the rifles for the United 
 States Government at cost plus ten 
 per cent. They were allowed six per 
 cent on the value of the plants as 
 a part of the cost of manufacturing, 
 and then in addition given a net 
 profit of ten per cent on the total 
 cost of manufacture, whatever that 
 might be. They are not only guar- 
 anteed six per cent on the value of 
 their plants after all expense of 
 operation and manufacture has been 
 provided for, but in addition a bonus 
 of ten per cent on all the cost, in- 
 cluding the six per cent. 
 
 In an investigation before the Com- 
 mittee on Appropriations of the 
 
 House, it appeared that upon this 
 contract these companies would make 
 from thirty to fifty per cent every 
 year on the capital invested, over 
 and above the six per cent. The full 
 profit depends upon the amount of 
 work they turn out and upon their 
 skill in inflating the cost. That is, 
 their profits will be not only six per 
 cent on every dollar invested, which 
 is guaranteed as an expense, but 
 from thirty to fifty per cent per 
 annum in addition. It is alleged by 
 some that when the contracts are 
 completed this ten per cent will ag- 
 gregate from three to four times as 
 much as the entire cost of their 
 plant. That is, they are not only 
 guaranteed six per cent on their in- 
 vestment, but vdll be given in addi- 
 tion a gratuity of three or four times 
 the value of the plants. 
 
 When Mr. Scott, Chairman of the 
 Council for National Defense, was 
 interrogated about this matter, he 
 said he thought it was a good con- 
 tract because the cost would be less 
 than the amount the Allies had paid 
 for the arms they bought in the 
 United States. That is, if these com- 
 panies do not rob us as much as they 
 did the Allies before we got into 
 the war, Scott thinks we are getting 
 off well. 
 
 Now we ask our good friends who 
 question the expedience of our criti- 
 cism, how can anyone with conscience 
 ask an American citizen to approve 
 of such an administration of public 
 affairs? If this profligacy continues 
 during Mr. Wilson's term or while 
 the war lasts, this nation will be 
 hopelessly bankrupt, and all sense of 
 moral obligation to the public will 
 be destroyed. There never has been 
 any government which tolerated such 
 corruption that has not gone down. 
 
 We believe that our country today 
 has reached the most critical period 
 in its history. We are a rich and 
 powerful nation. We can defeat any 
 foreign foe which may attack us. 
 But if we give way to the avarice 
 of the times and tolerate gross in- 
 conjpetency, corruption and shame- 
 less graft in our public affairs, the 
 end of our national existence will 
 soon be reached. The most patriotic 
 service that any American citizen 
 can today render his country is to 
 demand that honesty and efficiency be 
 
27 
 
 restored in the management of its 
 affairs. He owes this to himself as a 
 citizen, to his country as a patriot, 
 and to the boys that are sent to the 
 front to carry the country's flag on 
 fields of battle. They should be made 
 to feel that an honest and efficient 
 government is behind them, not one 
 seething with corruption. 
 
 THURSDAY, OCTO BER 4, 1917. 
 
 THE REVENUE BILL. 
 
 The revenue bill as agreed upon 
 by the conferees is a complete vic- 
 tory for the plunder-bund. 
 
 While the conferees increased the 
 amount of tax that will be raised 
 some i?300,000,000 over that carried 
 by the senate bill, they did not in- 
 crease the excess profits tax, but im- 
 posed a 3-cent postage tax on letters, 
 a tax on mortgages and evidences of 
 indebtedness on telegrams, telephone 
 messages, railroad fares, amusement 
 tickets, etc., leaving the men and 
 corporations that are making fabu- 
 ' luus sums out of war profits to enjoy 
 their ill-gotten gain. 
 
 The proposition made by Senator 
 Johnson of California when the bill 
 was before the senate was to take 
 the average profit of a firm or in- 
 dividual for three years before the 
 war, in any event not less than six 
 per cent, and to exempt that from 
 any excess profit tax, but to impose 
 a tax of eighty per cent on t^e excess 
 over and above the average profits 
 before the war. 
 
 To illustrate: The E. L du Pont 
 Powder company, which is the pow- 
 der trust and controls the manufac- 
 ' ture and sale of explosives in the 
 United States, made an average profit 
 before the war of something over 
 ,^ $4,000,000 per annum, which is more 
 t than six per cent on the capital in- 
 l vested. Last year its profits were 
 f $82,000,000. 
 
 The amendment of Senator John- 
 son would have deducted the $4,000,- 
 , 000 from the $82,000,000 leaving 
 f $78,000,00, which is the profit due 
 Wholly to the war, and taking eighty 
 per cent of that for the government 
 which would still leave the powder 
 company a profit of approximately 
 $20,000,000 more than it made on an 
 average before the war. The same 
 principle would have been applied to 
 
 all other war profits, which would 
 have guaranteed to every concern 
 twenty per cent more profits than 
 those made before the war began, or 
 than the normal peace profits. 
 
 This is what Great Britain does; 
 but Senator Johnson's amendment 
 was overwhelmingly defeated in the 
 senate and the house conferees ac- 
 quiesced in the senate's action. The 
 administration was perfectly satis- 
 fied with the results, or in other 
 words approved the action of the sen- 
 ate because every administration 
 leader in the senate voted against 
 the Johnson amendment; and while 
 we are taxing the rank and file of 
 the people in every conceivable way, 
 we have refused to make the men 
 who are coining millions out of the 
 blood of our sons pay a fair share 
 of their excessive war profits into 
 the public treasury. 
 
 We are spending more money in 
 this war than any other nation today 
 that is involved in it and we are levy- 
 ing the lowest taxes on the war 
 profits. 
 
 We feel that it is the duty of 
 every patriotic American citizen to 
 hold to an account every senator and 
 congressman and President Wilson 
 for this inqiuitous measure that 
 places not only the bitrden of this 
 war upon the masses of the people, 
 but permits ill-gotten wealth to 
 escape a fair share of the burden. 
 
 ^SATURD AY, OCTOBER 6, 1917. 
 
 AS GUILTY AS THE THIEF. 
 
 Thousands of homes in Kansas to- 
 day are grief-stricken because of the 
 chairs made vacant by the absence of 
 sons whose welfare is dearer to 
 many than life itself. These boys 
 have voluntarily or by the command 
 of the government gone into the 
 United States army to represent this 
 country in the great European con- 
 flict. 
 
 Whether they go voluntarily or at 
 the command of the government, they 
 are entitled to all the comforts and 
 all the protection it is possible for 
 the government to give them, and no 
 sacrifice which those of us at home 
 can make for their welfare should 
 be spared. 
 
 The people of Kansas and the na- 
 tion are unanimous in the desire that 
 
28 
 
 the army shall be equipped with every 
 possible facility for effective work 
 and that the soldiers' life, hard and 
 exacting as it must be, shall be made 
 as comfortable as possible. No ex- 
 penditure of money should be with- 
 held that is necessary to provide such 
 facilities and comforts, but the obli- 
 gations which the people of the 
 United States have assumed in the 
 support and maintenance of this 
 army make it incumbent upon every 
 public officer concerned to be ef- 
 ficient and# honest in the discharge 
 of his duties. 
 
 To waste the government's re- 
 sources, to misappropriate its money 
 and to make useless and unnecessary 
 expenditures mean that this army 
 will not be properly equipped and 
 supported, and that the people whose 
 sons compose the army and upon 
 whose shoulders rests the burden of 
 paying the taxes to sustain it are 
 being grossly mistreated by officials 
 whose duty it is to protect them. 
 The attitude which administration 
 journals so flppantly take that any 
 criticism of maladministration must 
 not be tolerated is infamous. 
 
 The young soldiers at Fort Riley 
 are suffering today because of mis- 
 management and incompetency. Mil- 
 lions of the public money, which is 
 to be provided by the most onerous 
 taxes, have been wasted in the most 
 profligate manner, not for the bene- 
 fit of the United S^tates army but 
 to enrich an army of grafters who 
 like vultures are hanging about the 
 camps and hovering about the capi- 
 tal of the nation expecting to gorge 
 themselves out of the fabulous appro- 
 priations that are being made by 
 congress. 
 
 When rottenness in the expendi- 
 tures of the nation is exposed, ad- 
 ministration organs at once cry out 
 that it is giving aid and encourage- 
 ment to the enemy, and that regard- 
 less of the incompetency, the crimi- 
 nality, or the perfidy of our govern- 
 mental officials at this time silence 
 should be maintained. 
 
 The facts are that the criminal 
 who commits the offense is the real 
 traitor and those who would con- 
 ceal it or denounce his, exposure are 
 as guilty as the thief himself. 
 
 MONDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1917. 
 
 BETRAYS THE INTERESTS OF 
 THE COUNTRY. 
 
 The Red Men are to be commended 
 for the position they took in their 
 state convention at Topeka in regard 
 to the drafting of wealth. 
 
 If you can draft a young man, take 
 him from his farm or business, 
 leave his wife and children helpless, 
 compel him to sell all of his hold- 
 ings and practically close up his busi- 
 ness indefinitely at great loss and 
 take him to France to risk his health, 
 limb and life for the government 
 why should we not be able to take 
 the excessive wealth of men, which 
 they do not need, to pay the finan- 
 cial burdens of the war? 
 
 But the most radical proposals 
 made in congress were not to con- 
 fiscate the wealth, but to take 80 per 
 cent of the exclusively war profits. 
 Congress and the administration re- 
 fused to assess a tax of 80 per cent 
 on the exclusively war profits; and 
 during the next year while hundreds 
 of thousands of the best young men 
 in the land are sacrificing everything 
 for the country, the munition makers 
 and exploiters, who are growing rich 
 out of this war, will continue to reap 
 their harvest of blood-money, thanks 
 to the present congress and the na- 
 tional administration in Washington. 
 
 The steel trust, whose profits last 
 year were approximately four times 
 its normal peace profits, has about 
 one-third of that excess assessed for 
 taxes. The same is true of the pack- 
 ing houses, the shoe manufacturers, 
 the gun maker and other firms, in- 
 dividuals or corporations that furnish 
 war materials. For them the war 
 is still a source of inexhaustable 
 profits. 
 
 The clerk in the store, the laborer 
 on the street or in the field, who 
 struggles and toils for the comforts 
 and necessities of life, meets the 
 tax-gatherer everywhere. His net 
 earnings are reduced far below what 
 they were before the war, while the 
 profiteers from war materials ar^ 
 making their untold millions. 
 
 The average citizen will bear his 
 burden uncomplainingly. He will 
 make any sacrifices which a patriotic 
 citizen should for the welfare of his 
 
29 
 
 country, but he has a right to de- 
 mand and it is his duty to demand 
 that no man be permitted to amass 
 enormous fortunes out of the war, 
 and any public official, whether he 
 be in the legislative or executive 
 department of the government who 
 does not favor taking exclusively war 
 profits for the support of the govern- 
 ment betrays the interests of the 
 public and should be repudiated by 
 the people. 
 
 _ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1917. 
 
 HAS NO RIGHT TO EXPECT IT. 
 
 Colonel Roosevelt criticises the ad- 
 ministration severely because eight 
 months have passed since we de- 
 clared war and nothing has been 
 done except inefficient preliminaries 
 and excessive talk. Manifestoes are 
 not what the Colonel wants and he 
 seems to be growing weary of them. 
 
 But the Colonel must reflect a 
 while and permit his indignation to 
 cool. He should remember that the 
 president made war on Mexico twice 
 before he declared war against Ger- 
 many. He captured Vera Cruz and 
 actually shed some blood; and then 
 had the troops, after staying there 
 a few months, get aboard the trans- 
 ports and come back home. He sent 
 them there to compel Huerta to sa- 
 lute the flag and brought them back 
 apparently because he would not do 
 it. Then when some Mexican bandits 
 plundered an American village, he 
 sent the American army with a flour- 
 ish of trumpets and the expendi- 
 ture of hundred of millions of dollars 
 into Mexico. General Pershing led 
 the expedition. As the Colonel will 
 I recall, when Pershing got near the 
 enemy he was ordered to stop and 
 was held there inert for seven months 
 and then ordered back home. 
 
 We read in the press dispatches 
 that the president now has Colonel 
 House, this mysterious Wall Street 
 friend of his, and Justice Brandeis 
 as a committee to study peace terms; 
 and the Colonel need not be sur- 
 prised, if after we have spent the 
 twenty-one billion dollars that have 
 been appropriated and thousands of 
 the administration's friends have been 
 given most lucrative public employ- 
 ment in the army and in other official 
 positions and have made hundreds of 
 
 millions out of the war contracts 
 that the president should conclude 
 that peace is better than war and 
 order the American army to come 
 back from France as he did when 
 he sent Funston to Vera Cruz and 
 Pershing into Mexico. 
 
 If the tax bill had taken the war 
 profits from the men who are mak- 
 ing billions out of the war we would 
 now have thousands of these war 
 profiteers crying for peace instead of 
 demanding the impeachment of 
 Gronna, LaFollette and others. 
 
 The Colonel should remember that 
 it has not been the habit of the presi- 
 dent to stand for any one policy a 
 great length of time. He was for 
 peace a year ago. Then he changed 
 and became very much for war, and 
 has been in that state of mind since 
 last March. Does the Colonel expect 
 the president to stand for that policy 
 much longer? If so, he may be dis- 
 appointed. 
 
 There are some things, however, 
 that this administration is certain to 
 do and do them effectively, viz: to 
 waste the public money, create thou- 
 sands and possibly hundreds of thou- 
 sands of useless offices to take c^re 
 of its partisan friends, write beauti- 
 ful notes' and deliver eloquent ad- 
 dresses. 
 
 Under the circumstances has 
 Colonel Roosevelt any right to ex- 
 pect a heroic or energetic adminis- 
 tration of public affairs or the prose- 
 cution of the war with eflfectiveness 
 until there is a radical change in the 
 personnel of our administrative of- 
 ficers ? 
 
 THURSDAY, OCTOBER 11, 19177 
 
 DANGEROUS SIGNS OF THE 
 TIMES. 
 
 The special session of Congress 
 that was called to declare war upon 
 Germany has adjourned. It seems to 
 be proud of its record, and that of 
 which it boasts the most is the un- 
 precedented appropriations that it has 
 made. 
 
 It has the proud distinction of 
 having appropriated a larger amount 
 of money than was ever appro- 
 priated before by any legislative body 
 in a like period of time. It has 
 also passed the largest specific ap- 
 propriation bills, and probably has 
 
30 
 
 levied more onerous taxes upon the 
 activities of the people than were 
 ever levied by any congress that 
 preceded it. 
 
 The country will suffer from its • 
 reckless extravagance for generations 
 to come. It was a congress without 
 leadership that simply recorded the 
 will of a dictator and was as sub- 
 servient to the executive as was ever 
 any Mexican congress to Diaz in the 
 days of his power. Any member of 
 the body, charged with the responsi- 
 bility of appropriating money and 
 levying taxes, who dared to criticize, 
 or even hesitated to obey the wishes 
 of the president was at once de- 
 nounced as a" traitor, and so fearful 
 were the members of the legislative 
 branch of the government of such 
 criticism they hastened to do what- 
 ever the executive indicated he 
 wanted done, and in practically every 
 instance failed to inquire as to its 
 wisdom or pass judgment upon its 
 desirability. 
 
 If future American congresses are 
 to be simply the abject tools of the 
 executive, then we had better change 
 our form of government from a re- 
 public with three coordinate branches 
 to a dictatorship with one supreme 
 head, which, of course, would mean 
 the end of representative government. 
 However, we propose to fight for the 
 preservation of the republic and the 
 independence of the representatives 
 of the people. 
 
 "SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 19177 
 
 PRODUCER AND POLITICS. 
 
 Our esteemed townsman and co- 
 laborer, the Honorable Maurice Mc- 
 Auliffe, has called a meeting of the 
 wheat growers for Wednesday, Octo- 
 ber 17, at Kansas City, Kansas, to 
 consider the situation as to wheat, 
 and distinctly announced that no 
 political discussion will be permitted. 
 
 We would like to know what is 
 troubling the wheat producers, today, 
 if it is not the political situation. If 
 politics had not interfered with the 
 price of wheat, the wheat growers 
 would have had no complaint. Be- 
 fore Mr. Hoover reduced the price, 
 they were getting a normal price 
 measured by the price of other 
 products. 
 
 The administration, so the press 
 dispatches say, is greatly disap- 
 pointed at the amount of wheat that 
 is being brought to market and are 
 accusing the farmers of treason. 
 That is, when an Oklahoma or Kan 
 sas farmer has wheat for which he 
 can get from $1.80 to $1.90 per 
 bushel by hauling it to market and 
 who will have to pay for feed for 
 his live stock from $1.90 to $2.25 a 
 bushel for corn, depending upon his 
 locality, and haul it from the mar- 
 ket home, he is accused of treason 
 because he does not haul his wheat 
 off and sell it and buy corn at a 
 higher price and haul it home to feed 
 his stock; and he is threatened with 
 confiscation of his property for lack 
 of patriotism. 
 
 When Mr. McAuliffe says that he 
 wants a conference of wheat growers, 
 but that politics must not be men- 
 tioned, we suppose his purpose is to 
 discuss the condition of the soil and 
 the weather. 
 
 The State Journal of October 1 
 has an article headed "Kansas Farm- 
 ers to Force Government to Seize all 
 Wheat. There is little doubt that 
 they are hoarding. Prices may be set 
 by grain corporation. Loyalty of 
 soldiers of the soil being questioned." 
 
 Then it goes on and demonstrates 
 that there is not as much wheat 
 being marketed now as there was last 
 year, concludes that the farmers 
 are hoarding and makes a general at- 
 tack upon the Kansas farmer. 
 
 While riding on a train a few days 
 ago we overheard a conversation by 
 some gentlemen seated across the 
 aisle. One of them appeared to be 
 a dealer in oil stocks, another one 
 was a railroad man, another ap- 
 peared to be a merchant, and the 
 fourth, as near as could be gathered 
 from the conversation, was a capi- 
 talist or speculator. 
 
 They were unanimous in condemn- 
 ing the farmer as being a selfish hog, 
 unpatriotic and devoid of the fine 
 impulses that are worthy of an 
 American citizen, because he was not 
 satisfied with the price which the 
 government had fixed for his wheat, 
 and talked very knowingly of the 
 great profits being made and the 
 opulence in which the Kansas 
 farmer is living. These men, none 
 of whom probably knew what labor 
 
31 
 
 was or had ever endured any hard- 
 ships or struggled against the ad- 
 versity of climate in order to make 
 a living or to acquire what prop- 
 erty they may have, indulged freely 
 in unmeasured criticism of the men 
 who have made the wealth of this 
 state and transformed it from a 
 ilesert to a garden spot. 
 
 They did not take into considera- 
 tion the years of failure, the long, 
 toilsome labor which the farmer has 
 to go through month after month 
 and year after year in order to make 
 liome life bearable upon the farm. 
 His losses due to storms and stress 
 of weather and failure they forgot 
 and only thought of some isolated 
 case where he turns his crop upon 
 a fine market and makes a profit for 
 that particular season. In the food 
 regulation which Mr. Hoover is now 
 carrying on the only man who 
 handles the food products of America 
 who is not guaranteed a profit is the 
 man who produces them, and . when 
 he complains that the prices are not 
 compensatory, taking into considera- 
 tion the losses he has incurred in 
 order to produce his crop, he is 
 denounced by the men who live by 
 speculating on his toil as guilty of 
 treason. 
 
 The safest, soundest and most 
 economical and enduring civilization 
 that mankind has yet produced has 
 been that which grows out of the 
 pursuit of agriculture and its allied 
 industries; and it is an unfortunate 
 period for American history when 
 the farmer who produces the products 
 of foed and clothing for mankind is 
 derided by the men who live as toll 
 takers and produce nothing for the 
 benefit of the human race. If farm- 
 ing is such an opulent and profitable 
 business why won't they go into it. 
 There are millions of acres of idle 
 land waiting for them. The reason 
 they do not go into the business is 
 that they have to work too hard for 
 what they get. 
 
 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1917. 
 
 LORD NORTHCLIFFE'S SPEECH. 
 
 Lord Northcliffe's speech at Kan- 
 sas City before the editors on Thurs- 
 day afternoon was a remarkably 
 frank expression of his views as to 
 the general conduct of the war, and 
 
 a somewhat blunt but much merited 
 criticism of American newspapers. 
 
 If the editor of the Journal had 
 delivered the speech and applied the 
 criticisms made by Northcliflfe on 
 general war policies directly to 
 Amercau affairs he would have been 
 denounced throughout the nation by 
 the administration press as guilty of 
 treason. Yet we are pleased to note 
 that the Baron's criticism has been 
 received kindly on the whole by 
 newhpapers that have heretofore de- 
 clared that any criticism of the ad- 
 ministration in power in time of war 
 regardless of the wisdom or folly of 
 its acts, was treason. In fact the 
 most useful patriot is he who cour- 
 ageously and intelligently points out 
 to the administration its blunders and 
 mistakes. 
 
 It will be remembered by the in- 
 telligent American reader that Lord 
 Northcliffe, at the beginning of the 
 war, was threatened by the English 
 Government with imprisonment. In- 
 deed, Premier Asquith went so far 
 as to declare that unless he stopped 
 his criticism of the Government his 
 papers would be suppressed. But 
 Northcliffe did not stop his criticism. 
 He pointed out the utter inadequacy 
 of the English antiquated arms and 
 munitions. He informed the British 
 public of the awful disasters and mis- 
 takes attending the military cam- 
 paigns. Hfe forced a reorganiation of 
 both the army and the admiralty, and 
 ultimately the entire administration 
 of British affairs. This he did, not 
 as a traitor, but as the greatest 
 patriot which England had at that 
 disastrous period of its experience. 
 
 If the United States had a few edi- 
 tors of great metropolitan papers as 
 courageous, as bold in expressidn, 
 and as penetrating in seeing into the 
 defects of our administration as 
 Northcliffe was in his discussion of 
 the mistakes of Great Britain, we 
 would have avoided the awful waste 
 that has attended every move that 
 our Government has made since the 
 war began. But the American met- 
 ropolitan papers, instead of demand- 
 ing economy, honesty and intelli- 
 gence in the administration of our 
 national affairs, have denounced and 
 assailed every man who has seen fit 
 to criticise administrative acts, which 
 privately the editors of all these met- 
 
32 
 
 ropolitan newspapers admit were in- 
 efficient, in some cases corrupt, and 
 in almost every respect inetfective. 
 
 We do not agree with a number of 
 the positions of Lord NorthclifFe, but 
 we commend his address to the care- 
 ful consideration of every intelli- 
 gent American citizen who wants his 
 country to succeed in the tremendous 
 undertaking in which it is now en- 
 gaged. 
 
 We especially commend the covert 
 criticism of .the sensational and 
 nauseating literature which fills the 
 American press today. The metro- 
 politan papers and many of the 
 smaller dailies exaggerate every 
 slight victory or success attending 
 the Allied armies and minimize the 
 calamities which befall them. North- 
 cliffe pointed out in his severe criti- 
 cism of American newspapers that 
 the victory of the French where they 
 took 7,500 prisoners had been em- 
 blazoned in headlines in bold, black 
 type, while the 100,000 casualties 
 suffered during the same week by the 
 Allies found expression in small type 
 in an obscure place in the paper. 
 He very rightly said that such a 
 policy was not honest and would not 
 command the respect of the Ameri- 
 can people; that what the public 
 wanted from the newspapers was 
 the truth whether it was agreea- 
 ble or disagreeable to the popular 
 fancy, and that the papers were in 
 duty bound to publish if they were 
 honest, the facts, disagreeable as they 
 might be. 
 
 Another thing greatly to Lord 
 Northcliffe's credit is that he didn't 
 indulge in the sickening rot which the 
 military propagandists in the United 
 States do in denouncing the German 
 people as a whole. If you credit the 
 statements of the hired orators of the 
 military propagandists you will con- 
 clude that the German people are 
 hideous monsters, more brutal in 
 their cruelty than Comanche Indians 
 or African savages. Lord North- 
 cliffe, who has spent much time in 
 Germany, says they are a peace- 
 loving, industrious, frugal people, but 
 dominated by a military autocracy 
 that seeks to rule the world, and 
 that Great Britain's war is not 
 against the German people but 
 against the autocracy and its poli- 
 cies which they support, that unfor- 
 
 tunately a majority of the people 
 support the autocracy and because of 
 their loyalty must inevitably suffer. 
 On the whole, his address was able, 
 in good temper, philosophical and 
 very constructive. 
 
 MONDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1917. ^ 
 
 31 AY BE FORTUNATE FOR THE 
 NATION. 
 
 The Journal has opened its columns 
 unreservedly to the campaign for the 
 sale of the issue of 4% United States 
 bonds. It did this not because it ap- 
 proved all of the methods that were 
 adopted for the sale of these bonds, 
 although on the whole we believe 
 they were much more dignified and 
 becoming than the first campaign. 
 
 The literature in the main was 
 very much superior to the original 
 literature that was sent out for the 
 sale of the 3^/^ per cent bonds, and 
 by the time the next issue comes, 
 the probabilities are that our Govern- 
 ment will have gotten down to a 
 decent and orderly procedure in the 
 issue of its securities. 
 
 We regret that many poor people 
 who cannot afford to buy the bonds 
 were by a system of semi-coercion 
 induced to purchase them. Our 
 theory is that the men who have 
 money should furnish the Govern- 
 ment with the money to carry on the 
 war and not ask those who have a 
 hard time to live during these war 
 times to skimp themselves of really 
 the necessities and comforts of life in 
 order to furnish the Government 
 funds. The poor people in the United 
 States independent of Ibond purchases 
 are making the greatest sacrifice. 
 They are bearing the greatest bur- 
 den of taxation and the rich men 
 should furnish the Government 
 abundantly of their funds. 
 
 But on the whole we are inclined 
 to believe that it will be good for 
 the Government for the rank and 
 file of the people to make the sacri- 
 fice which they are making in pur- 
 chasing these bonds. It will give 
 them a more direct interest in the 
 expenditure of the fund which they 
 are making such sacrifice to provide. 
 If they will only demand that the 
 money which they provide in this 
 way shall be honestly and economi- 
 cally expended, that the waste which 
 
33 
 
 IS admitted to exist everywhere shall 
 cease, that the unnecessary expendi- 
 ture of vast amounts be stopped, that 
 intelligence and honesty be supreme 
 in the administration of our govern- 
 ment finances, great things will have 
 been accomplished by the widespread 
 purchase of bonds that has been made 
 by the American people. The wel- 
 fare of this nation demands the peo- 
 ple fully to realize that when a can- 
 tonment such as that at Fort Riley 
 costs two or three times what it 
 should have cost, that when the Gov- 
 ernment pays over $50.00 apiece for 
 rifles which it formerly obtained for 
 {14.00, it is wasting their money 
 which they obtained by hard labor 
 and sacrifice. Then, they will hold 
 more strictly to account their public 
 servants, their members of Congress 
 and United States Senators who ap- 
 propriate the money and authorize 
 the expenditure. The widespread 
 holding of these bonds may ultimate- 
 ly lead to a much needed reorganiza- 
 tion of our national finances. 
 
 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30. 1917. 
 
 ARE BEGINNING TO WAKE UP. 
 
 The keynote of Lord NorthCliffe's 
 speech at Kansas City, and indeed of 
 his speech everywhere on his western 
 tour, has been the need of ships. He 
 made the startling statement at Kan- 
 sas 'City that it would require ten 
 tons of shipping to supply every 
 soldier that the United States had 
 in France. Then he called attention 
 to the deplorable lack of necessary 
 I shipping for us to sustain any con- 
 '■ siderable sized army in Europe. He 
 illustrated the tremendous burden 
 which rested upon the American peo- 
 ple by declaring that if the United 
 States maintained an army of many 
 hundred thousand soldiers in France, 
 it would be necessary to ship at once 
 for the use of that army 500 locomo- 
 tives and 40,000 railway cars of dif- 
 ferent types and kinds, in addition 
 to other railway equipment. 
 
 Our government does not permit 
 
 the American people to know how 
 
 I many soldiers they have in Europe. 
 
 I One rumor states there are one hun- 
 
 l dred thousand, and another rumor 
 
 that there are three or four hundred 
 
 thousand. If there are one hundred 
 
 thousand American troops in Europe 
 
 and there are at least that number 
 then it is necessary for us to have a 
 million tons of shipping devoted ex- 
 clusively to the service of this army 
 in order to furnish it with supplies, 
 munitions, etc. And we haven't now 
 one-half of that amount, probably 
 not one-fourth of it available for 
 that purpose. 
 
 To send other soldiers to Europe 
 before we have the ships to furnish 
 them with supplies will be an ad- 
 ministrative blunder more dangerous 
 than the Dardanelles campaign for 
 Great Britain. We will have an army 
 in France without supplies, simply a 
 burden upon the Allies- 
 It is probably the full knowledge 
 of our weakness in shipping that has 
 led the Allies to suggest to our ad- 
 ministration that they do not need 
 men so much as supplies. That, 
 probably, is an indirect way of sug- 
 gesting to us the tremendous blunder 
 that we may make in rushing men 
 to France in greater numbers than 
 we are able to maintain. 
 
 It has been announced that it is 
 the policy of the Administration to 
 have a million men in France by the 
 first of next July. It is not possible 
 to have a sufficient amount of ship- 
 ping available by the first of July 
 to maintain more than 25 per cent 
 of that number in active service. In- 
 deed, bending every energy in the 
 construction of ships, we probably 
 will not be able inside of two years 
 to provide sufficient tonnage to fully 
 supply an army of a million men. 
 
 It must be remembered, as Lord 
 Northcliffe so clearly pointed out, 
 that the ocean is infested with Ger- 
 man submarines, who are seeking to 
 destroy the military power of the 
 Allies. They are sinking the ships 
 bearing cargo that will be most use- 
 ful to the army and they have dealt 
 some terrible blows to the Allies dur- 
 ing the last six months in this re- 
 spect. 
 
 It is the part of wisdom for Ger- 
 many to sink a transport loaded with 
 necessary supplies for the army 
 rather than to sink a transport loaded 
 with soldiers, for the soldiers in 
 France without supplies are a burden 
 upon the Allies and not an asset. 
 This Germany knows. 
 
 While Northcliffe is an Englishman 
 here in the interest of the English 
 
34 
 
 government, devoted ardently to the 
 English cause, yet his frank and open 
 .-itatement of the weakness of the 
 American situation should be of in- 
 estimable value to the American 
 people. 
 
 We deeply regret that it required 
 an Englishman, speaking in the cen- 
 ter of the American continent, to first 
 notify the people in the heart of this 
 nation of the great emergency and 
 demand that is upon our government 
 and the crises that confront it. In- 
 stead of pointing out the w^eaknesses 
 arising from our administration's in- 
 efficiency, the great American news- 
 papers have indulged in vituperation 
 and abuse of the men who have 
 sought to do so and praised those in 
 public positions whom they knew to 
 be inefficient and ineffective, because 
 of a false notion that their obliga- 
 tion and duty was to sustain the 
 administration right or wrong be- 
 cause we are in war. \ 
 
 It is the duty of the government 
 of the United States, regardless of 
 whose hands it is in, to serve the 
 American people. To involve theni 
 in enormous expenditures, to impose 
 upon them terrible sacrifice and to 
 conceal from them the truth as to 
 administrative policies and results of 
 administrative acts, is criminal and 
 treasonable and the American public 
 is beginning to wake up to this fact. 
 
 THUR SDAY, NOVEMBER T,~1917." 
 
 HE BEARS THE BURDEN. 
 
 The State of Kansas is being in- 
 vaded this week systematically by the 
 "Willing Workers of Hoover" in his 
 campaign for economy. Mr. Hoover 
 has an appropriation at his disposal 
 of some one hundred and eighty mil- 
 lions of dollars. He has employed 
 at lucrative salaries hundreds of 
 men and women to promote his plans 
 and has also enlisted thousands of 
 workers without pay. We are in 
 sympathy with any movement that 
 will induce the American people to 
 economize in their life, and habits 
 aijd eliminate waste. In this respect 
 we believe Mr. Hoover has the hearty 
 support of the American people. 
 
 Mr. Hoover expected, so we have 
 been advised on good authority, to 
 fix the price of live stock, but the 
 experience in price fixing of wheat 
 
 demonstrates that to fix the price ol 
 the basing product gives no relief 
 to the consumer because flour and 
 bread are selling now for approxi- 
 mately the same as they did under 
 $2.75 and $3.00 wheat, so that the 
 only party that has been effected by 
 the reduction in the price of wheat is 
 the producer. The profits of those 
 who handle wheat and its products 
 have been stabilized so they know 
 exactly what they . can expect. The 
 only man who takes any chance in 
 the production of bread — the "stall 
 of life" today — is the farmer who 
 produces the wheat from which it is 
 made. He may lose his seed and 
 labor and all that he has invested; 
 nobody makes him good, and his loss 
 is not taken into consideration in 
 figuring the cost of producing his 
 crop the following year, but every 
 other individual who touches grain 
 and its products from the time it 
 leaves the farm has a guaranteed 
 profit. 
 
 The National Live Stock Associa- 
 tion was powerful enough to pre- 
 vent Mr. Hoover from fixing an arbi- 
 trary price for cattle, but he has 
 announced this week that he in- 
 tends to fix the price which the 
 packer shall charge for meat, which 
 means that he intends to fix the 
 price which the live stock producer 
 will obtain -for his stock, because 
 the packer fixes the price of live 
 stock and when Mr. Hoover reduc^es 
 the price of meat the packer will 
 not sacrifice his profits but will take 
 it out of the farmer. They in the 
 end, will bear the burden. 
 
 It is incomprehensible to us why 
 this whole price fixing propaganda 
 should be directed ultimately to the 
 American farmer. He is the bul- 
 wark of our civilization; he is pro- 
 ducing the food of mankind; he 
 has been from the beginning of this 
 nation its "bone and sinew"; he 
 represents the great masses of the 
 common run of men. Upon the 
 American farm you find no mil- 
 lionaires and few paupers, but a hard 
 working, honest, frugal citizen, in- 
 terested in the welfare of his country 
 and of mankind; but the tendency for 
 the last few years, culminating in 
 the present food propaganda, has 
 been to increase his burden by legis- 
 lative enactment and to discouragp 
 
35 
 
 his industry. For 40 years he stood 
 heroically by the protective tariff 
 policy because he wanted to develop 
 a home market for the products of 
 the soil and this was done, but now 
 he is to be deprived of the advant- 
 ages of that home market, and, dur- 
 ing the stress of war times when 
 prices of everything which he uses 
 are "mounting to the sky," the Gov- 
 ernment refuses to permit the 
 products of his toil to keep pace in 
 the upward movement, and he is 
 abundantly justified in the deep re- 
 sentment which is growing up in his 
 heart against the present administra- 
 rive policy of our government. 
 
 MONDAY, NOVEMBER"~127^1917r 
 
 WHEN WILL THE CONSUMER 
 BENEFIT? 
 
 Another list of maximum steel 
 prices has been fixed by the adminis- 
 trative forces. This time they have 
 fixed the price on scrap iron and 
 sheet steel, tin plate, etc., which 
 will be very gratifying to the manu- 
 facturer of domestic steel products. 
 
 We are patiently waiting for the 
 time to come when the consuming 
 public will get an advantage by re- 
 duced prices on steel products which 
 it uses. Fixing the price of scrap 
 iron is not of much interest to the 
 farmer who has to purchase agricul- 
 tural machinery, except that it re- 
 duces the price of the junk which 
 accumulates on the farm during the 
 course of years. 
 
 Is it to have any effect upon the 
 prices of the new machinery which 
 he is compelled to buy? What com- 
 modities used by the American people 
 in their household and business af- 
 fairs are to be reduced in price be- 
 cause of the fixed price of sheet steel 
 which the government has agreed 
 upon with the steel trust? 
 
 The consumers of the steel trust 
 who purchase from it their raw ma- 
 terial will be benefitted by a stabil- 
 ity of price. How much of an ad- 
 vantage are they going to give the 
 consuming public, and how are the 
 rank and file of the people upon 
 whom the burden rests the heaviest 
 to be benefitted? These are ques- 
 tions upon which we anxiously wait 
 for information. 
 
 WEDNE SDAY , NOVEMBER JjU 1917 
 
 SPEAKING TOO LATE. 
 
 We clip the following from last 
 Saturday's Kansas City Star, and 
 commend the spirit of the editorial: 
 
 "It is a great thing for a country 
 to have a man like Lord Northcliffe 
 who has the intelligence to •discern 
 things that are wrong and the cour- 
 age to speak out and tell about 
 them. Doubtless, as the Westminster 
 Gazette says, other distinguished 
 Englishmen have felt as Northcliffe 
 did, but none of them has had the 
 nerve to express his feelings. 
 
 "A country engaged in a life and 
 death struggle can't afford to let 
 politeness stand in the way of ef- 
 ficiency. Failure to criticise where 
 criticism is due, as has often been 
 said, may be disastrous. For it puts 
 a country's vital interests at the 
 mercy of incompetent men who may 
 chance through favoritism to be in 
 office." 
 
 The Journal has been contending 
 for months that what America 
 needed was a metropolitan press that 
 would speak the truth in regard to 
 the incompetency, extravagance, and 
 in many instances corruption, of the 
 existing administration. 
 
 Not only has the United States be- 
 come involved in the European war 
 because of the incompetent manage- 
 ment of its diplomatic affairs; but 
 since we entered the war our re- 
 sources have been wasted in reckless 
 extravagance, our men have been col- 
 lected in army camps before there 
 was provision made to take care of 
 them. They have been kept in light, 
 wooden buildings without fire, with 
 inadequate clothing, and as a result 
 Spinal meningitis and pneumonia 
 have taken many of them and per- 
 manently injured the health of others. 
 
 This could have been avoided by 
 ordinary foresight and the exercise 
 of ordinary intelligence in the admin- 
 istrative affairs of the goverpment. 
 What occasion was there to take 
 thousands of young men from their 
 comfortable homes, surrounded in 
 many cases by the luxuries of mod- 
 ern life and to put them without heat 
 and with inadequate clothing, in these 
 cantonments. 
 
 It is true that these young men 
 
3() 
 
 must endure hardships, for military 
 service is full of hardships; but ordi- 
 nary intellig-ence dictates that they 
 should be gradually accustomed to the 
 radical change in life which the army 
 service requires. But that ordinary 
 intelligence has not been exercised 
 by the Secretary of War. 
 
 If the Kansas City Star and other 
 metropolitan papers had spoken out 
 sooner — six months ago — and de- 
 manded efficiency, integrity and com- 
 mon sense on the part of the admin- 
 istrative officials much of the loss of 
 life and health and waste of public 
 funds would have been avoided. But 
 having failed then, we must be grate- 
 ful that now they are awaking to 
 the seriousness of the situation — too 
 late to save hundreds of millions of 
 dollars of funds that have been 
 wasted and the lives of many valua- 
 ble young men that have been lost— 
 but fortunately soon enough to lessen 
 the disaster of the future. 
 
 We also desire to commend Con- 
 gressman P. P. Campbell, who is now 
 bitterly complaining of the incompe- 
 tency of the existing administration. 
 It would have been better, in our 
 opinion, if Mr. Campbell had spoken 
 months ago. If one-tenth of the 
 members of Congress had spoken as 
 frankly six months ago as Mr. Camp- 
 bell speaks now, much of the disas- 
 ter could have been avoided; but un- 
 fortunately at that time they re- 
 mained quiet apparently to escape the 
 hostile criticism of the administration 
 and its votaries who then were riding 
 on the very apex of the war propa- 
 ganda. Speaking plainly then was 
 denounced as treason but time is 
 demonstrating that silence was more 
 treasonable than accusation. 
 
 THURSDAY , NOVEM BER 22, IO tT. 
 
 A FAIR TAX. 
 
 We note that the American News- 
 paper Association has a lobby at 
 Washington now demanding the re- 
 peal of that part of the revenue law 
 which increases the postage rate on 
 newspapers and magazines. 
 
 By expenditure of money and the 
 maintenance of a bureau of able 
 lobbyists at Washington they may 
 induce Congress to repeal this in- 
 crease in postage on newspapers. 
 The Journal will have its postage bill 
 
 more than doubled by this measure. 
 We are not anxious to pay an addi- 
 tional tax any more than is anybody 
 else; but we are paying our share of 
 the war tax in increased letter' post- 
 age, in a tax on amusements, a per- 
 centage tax upon freight bills and 
 railroad fares, etc. 
 
 None of these taxes are as just as 
 the increased postage on the news- 
 papers we are publishing. It is the 
 fairest and most deserving of all 
 of the postage increases that have 
 been made, and nothing is more con- 
 temptible or despicable than for the 
 metropolitan papers and magazines 
 to keep a lobby in Washington at 
 work to get out of paying a just and 
 fair postage rate to the United 
 States government. 
 
 Some members of this Association 
 went so far last spring as to allege 
 that because the newspapers were 
 supporting the government in time of 
 war that they should be exempted 
 from the just postal rate proposed. 
 
 It is a source of pride to us that 
 the executive committee of the Kan- 
 sas State Editorial Association is 
 backing the Post Office Department 
 in its effort to put newspaper post- 
 age upon an equitable and just basis, 
 so that the newspaper business will 
 pay its fair share, at least of the 
 expense which the government incurs 
 in handling its business. Our asso- 
 ciation is standing by the zone sys- 
 tem which is insisted upon by the 
 Post Office Department. 
 
 SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 1917. 
 
 LET THEM GO TO WORK. 
 
 The Chicago Tribune has made a 
 vicious attack upon the farmer of 
 the United States, accusing him of 
 a lack of appreciation of the nation's 
 welfare and of being selfish, isolated, 
 unpatriotic and an all around unde- 
 sirable citizen. 
 
 This criticism is indirectly ap- 
 proved by some of the metropolitan 
 papers in Kansas. These people 
 seem to resent the fact that the 
 American farmer iS' not a peasant 
 such as exists in Russia, who, with- 
 out complaint or resentment, accepts 
 any imposition placed upon him by 
 the governing class. 
 
 It is fashionable in certain quar- 
 ters to refer to a farmer who hap- 
 
37 
 
 pens to own an automobile as a 
 "plutocrat" and to speak with de- 
 rision and sarcasm of the down- 
 trodden agricultural class, because a 
 number of them have been able to 
 by automobiles ranging in value from 
 $350 to $1500— most of them, how- 
 ever, being Fords. These people 
 seem to think that the farmer does 
 not have ^ right to an automobile 
 such as the merchant or the profes- 
 sional men enjoy, when the fact is 
 that they are about the only ones 
 who can utilize, in a practical way, 
 the automobile. The farmer does not 
 get it for pleasure but as a useful 
 machine. It takes him to town and 
 back rapidly and enables him to 
 spend more time upon his farm, 
 which he has to do now, because of 
 the scarcity of labor. 
 
 The American farmer provides the 
 basic food and clothing products of 
 mankind. If these self-constituted 
 critics think that farming is so profit- 
 able, why do not they go into it 
 themselves? There are millions of 
 acres of land lying idle waiting for 
 the touch of their hands; and instead 
 of abusing the man who toils from 
 daylight to dark to produce the 
 food of the world these men ought 
 to acquire some of this idle land 
 and go to work and produce some- 
 thing themselves. Let them do some 
 real labor instead of living by their 
 wits and upon the energies of the 
 producing classes of the world. Then 
 they can discuss with more intelli- 
 gence and value the problems that 
 relate to the soil. 
 
 MONDAY, NOVEMB ER 26, 1917. 
 
 SUPERFICIAL PRICE FIXING. 
 
 The fixing of prices has been en- 
 tered upon as a policy for a few agri- 
 cultural products. The motive behind 
 the fixing of these prices was to 
 cheapen the cost of food in the large 
 cities and industrial centers of the 
 nation; and the reduction in the cost 
 of food has been the motive that has 
 determined the action of these price 
 fixing boards, although it is alleged 
 that they are seeking to increase pro- 
 duction of the food by guaranteeing 
 certain prices. In this, however, they 
 have utterly failed, because the men 
 9rhn control these boards do not 
 
 understand the industrial conditions 
 of the United States. 
 
 They are taking a very narrow 
 view of the situation. They want to 
 reduce the price of the food which 
 the people of New York City, for 
 example, have to have, and so they 
 seek to reduce the price which the 
 farmer is permitted to obtain for his 
 crop, as they have in the case of 
 wheat and hogs. 
 
 They lose sight of that great fund- 
 amental economic principle that sup- 
 ply is the greatest regulator of price. 
 It is a lamentable fact that for more 
 than a quarter of a century the en- 
 terprising young men of this country 
 have left the farm and gone to the 
 town. They did this because it was 
 more profitable to engage in other 
 lines of occupation than farming, and 
 the influx from the farm to the city 
 has been greater during recent 
 months than at any other time in the 
 country's history. 
 
 When a young man can come to 
 town and get employment at some 
 lucrative occupation and live with 
 greater comfort and ease than he 
 can by remaining in the country he 
 will come to town. The fact is that 
 the opportunities for enterprising and 
 aggressive young men are more num- 
 erous in the towns and cities of the 
 nation than they are in the rural 
 districts, which accounts for the 
 movement from country to city. 
 
 The greatest handicap to farming 
 operations in the United States is 
 the lack of labor. No farmer can 
 compete with the corporations in the 
 employment of men. They can pay 
 more than he can. They do pay 
 more and that is why competent " 
 young men go to them to obtain em- 
 ployment. Whenever it is more 
 profitable to remain on the farm and 
 pursue the vocation of agriculture 
 then there will be a larger number of 
 farmers and greater production. 
 
 The high cost of food, however, is 
 not because of the high prices the 
 farmer receives for his product. 
 Hogs at 15 to 17 cents a pound on 
 foot do not justfy a charge of 40 or 
 50 cents a pound for hams and bacon. 
 The hog on foot at 17 cents a pound 
 will not cost to exceed 22 to 24 
 cents a pound dressed, depending 
 upon the size and condition. Why 
 this price should be doubled when the 
 
38 
 
 cured meats reach the market has 
 not been satisfactorily explained, ex- 
 cept that it adds to the profits of 
 the packers. The pnly way to in- 
 crease production is to fix a price 
 that is profitable to the producer, 
 and the only way ta keep the con- 
 sumer from being imposed upon by 
 high prices is for the government to 
 take charge of the packing industry. 
 If we are going into the price-fixing 
 business that is the first and essential 
 step, and GifFord Pinchot was right 
 and time will demonstrate he was 
 when he insisted that that be done 
 and refused to longer remain as one 
 of Mr. Hoover's assistants, because 
 he felt that the efforts being made 
 were superficial and ineffective and 
 more in the interests of the dealer 
 than of the producer of farm 
 products. 
 
 SATURDAY. DECEMBER 1, 19177 
 
 SERVING THE CORPORATIONS 
 MORE THAN THE PUBLIC. 
 
 As an illustration of the develop- 
 ments of the present war government 
 in the United States, we call atten- 
 tion to the recent order of the food 
 board requiring millers to load all 
 carloads of flour and grain products 
 to at least 60,000 pounds before 
 shipment. 
 
 There has been a movement for 
 some time on the part of the rail- 
 ways, the Santa Fe being the most 
 insistent, in behalf of increasing the 
 minimum carload weight fixed for 
 grain products in the western states. 
 The minimum weight for a carload 
 of flour or grain products in Kansas 
 is 24,000 pounds. 
 
 Two hearings have been held by the 
 Kansas Commission in the last four 
 or five years, and in both instances 
 the Commission /efused to increase 
 the minimum carload weight, because 
 of the commercial conditions that 
 exist. As it is now, in Kansas a 
 dealer can order a carload of 24,000 
 pounds from a mill and get the car- 
 load rate. The Interstate Commerce 
 Commission has fixed 40,000 pounds 
 as the minimum weight for inter- 
 state or long shipments. A heavier 
 minimum weight should be required 
 for such shipments than the short 
 shipments. 
 
 President Ripley of the Santa Fe 
 
 made a violent attack upon the Kan- 
 sas Commission, because it refused 
 to increase its minimum weight for 
 grain products, and stated that it 
 was directly against the interests of 
 the railroads and the big shippers. 
 
 It seems that the railroads do not 
 care to be bothered with the small 
 dealers. What they want to serve 
 most is the large shippers and the 
 great commei'cial centers. The in- 
 terstate Commerce Commission re- 
 fused to increase the minimum 
 weight above 40,000 pounds, after 
 an exhaustive hearing and then re- 
 opened the case with a view to re- 
 ducing it somewhat if it appeared 
 that 40,000 pounds was too much to 
 best serve the commercial interests 
 of the country. 
 
 But when Mr. Hoover organized 
 his food conservation bureau, he se- 
 lected Mr. Chambers, vice president 
 in charge of traffic for the Santa Fe. 
 as one of his assistants and placed 
 him in charge of transportation. So 
 Mr. Chambers, now being clothed 
 with authority by the United States 
 government orders the mills which 
 have been licensed to deal in grain 
 and grain products by the food ad- 
 ministration to ship not less than 
 60,000 pounds in carload lots, there- 
 by taking advantage of this power 
 which his voluntary service to the 
 government gives him to over-ride 
 every state commission in the United 
 States and the Interstate Commerce 
 Commission as well, in the interests 
 of the railroads and big shippers. 
 
 This large minimum carload will 
 be destructive to the commercial in- 
 terests of many communities. These 
 corporation magnates who are prais- 
 ing themselves for patriotism, be- 
 cause they are working for the gov- 
 ernment for nothing are serving their 
 real employers the corporations far 
 more than the public. 
 
 MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1917. 
 
 NEED A GRANT. 
 
 In an editorial some two weeks 
 since the Journal declared what the 
 allies needed was more generals like 
 Grant and Sherman and fewer Mc- 
 Clellans. 
 
 We were assailed by the apologists 
 and votaries 'of the present adminis- 
 tration as usual for not extrava- 
 
39 
 
 gantly ijraisir^g what is being done, 
 right or wrong, effective or ineffec- 
 tive, and ridiculed by some for pre- 
 suming to know anything about the 
 military situation in Europe, not hav- 
 ing been there to make a personal 
 inspection. 
 
 We apologize for our ignorance; 
 but in spite of such lack of in- 
 formation we have an intense and 
 earnest desire for the allies to do 
 something really effective. We can- 
 not complain of the efforts that are 
 being made by the English, measur- 
 ing them by the losses they incur 
 week after week. They seem to 
 be losing more men weekly than 
 either side lost in the battle of Get- 
 tysburg, but for these enormous sac- 
 rifices they are obtaining little ad- 
 vantage. They advance until they 
 reach a critical point and then stop 
 while "the Germans intrench again. 
 
 American papers have been full of 
 praise for the recent advance near 
 Cambrai, but like the other English 
 movements it has been executed with 
 courage but with slight success. The 
 latest report is that they captured 
 9,000 prisoners and got within a few 
 miles of Cambrai and are now "con- 
 solidating their positions and hold- 
 ing their lines." 
 
 They made the same kind of an 
 advance near Lens four months ago 
 and have been only holding their 
 positions. Of course, that is very 
 much better than losing ground; but 
 when an advance is made there 
 ought to be massed behind that at- 
 tack a sufficient force to achieve 
 actual effective results. If Cambrai 
 had been taken and the military 
 stores captured before they were 
 moved back; if we had taken a fifth 
 or even a tenth as many prisoners as 
 the Germans took in the Italian drive 
 we would have counted it a substan- 
 tial victory; but apparently we have 
 made the enormous sacrifices neces- 
 sary to achieve this advance and still 
 get no substantial advantage. 
 
 The American newspapers have 
 made it appear that we had dealt a 
 irushing blow to the Germans on 
 ■the western front, but, in fact, it 
 
 as only a somewhat ineffective dent 
 n their line. 
 
 ': We do not think it is advantageous 
 exaggerate our successes or mini- 
 
 ize the achievements of our enemies. 
 
 As we have so often said^ what the 
 American people want is the truth 
 and they will prepare to meet what- 
 ever responsibilities rest upon them. 
 
 The Journal, as is known to all of 
 its readers, protested against our 
 entrance into this war. We believe 
 now that if there had been anything 
 like wise statesmanship in the man- 
 agement of our country's diplomatic 
 affairs during the last four years 
 we would not have been engaged in 
 this war. But this awful mistake is 
 made. 
 
 We are now into the war; we 
 have appropriated enormous sums of 
 money to carry it on; our sons have 
 enlisted and we have to fight it out. 
 However, we should go about this in 
 the most intelligent and effective 
 way. The thing of prime importance 
 is that the American people shall 
 understand the tremendous task they 
 have on hand. To fool them by ex- 
 aggerated reports of ineffective suc- 
 cesses or to minimize the strength 
 and forces of the enemy we have to 
 meet is dishonest and the crying 
 need now is a military genius to 
 lead the allied armies. 
 
 SATURDAY, JANUARY 5, 1918. 
 
 WE TRUST THE PLAN WILL SUC- 
 CEED. 
 
 The tremendous consequences of 
 the government taking over the rail- 
 roads, cannot now' properly be esti- 
 mated. That there is grave conges- 
 tion in the East in the transportation 
 of the nation is beyond question. This 
 congestion, however, has been brought 
 about largely by the government's 
 incoherent and unsystematic action in 
 regard to the movement of the nor- 
 mal traffic of the country. 
 
 There is suffering now in New 
 England, for fuel, that is very grave. 
 At least two-thirds of the fuel of 
 that section of the United States is 
 carried there during the summer and 
 fall months by water, most of it com- 
 ing in barges from Virginia, Mary- 
 land and Pennsylvania ports. 
 
 Last summer the shipping board 
 and the navy commandeered . prac- 
 tically all of the tugs and barges for 
 war purposes. This was done un- 
 mindful of the fact that it was very 
 seriously interfering with the norma] 
 domestic and industrial business of 
 
40 
 
 the greatest manufacturing centers 
 of the United States, and while these 
 facilities upon which the people de- 
 pended for the maintenance of their 
 industrial life were taken no effort 
 was made to see that other adequate 
 facilities were supplied. 
 
 When winter came and the fuel and 
 food shortages were apparent then- 
 a frantic effort was made to fill the 
 demands by rail transportation, and 
 an unusual burden was placed upon 
 the carriers — a heavier burden than 
 they could bear, and one they had 
 never expected to be called upon to 
 bear. 
 
 Dr. Garfield, the fuel administra- 
 tor, being wholly unfamiliar with 
 traffic affairs, under the war author- 
 ity of the President of the United 
 States, ordered the railroads to give 
 priority to fuel shipments and put an 
 embargo on many other commodities. 
 
 In order that the railroads might 
 comply, this necessitated the break- 
 ing up of through trains and the 
 making up of coal trains, as a vast 
 majority of the through trains car- 
 ried not only coal but other necessary 
 commodities. This greatly delayed 
 the normal operation of the trans- 
 portation facilities, increased in many 
 terminal centers the switching be- 
 tween 30 and 40 per cent, which re- 
 sulted in delay and congestion. The 
 result was that instead of hasten- 
 ing the shipment of fuel, as Director 
 Garfield with his theoretical ideas 
 thought it would do, it lessened the 
 amount of fuel shipped and con- 
 gested all other kinds of traffic until 
 the people in that section were des- 
 perate and suffering was imminent. 
 
 In the mean time, where food was 
 short, the food administration wa.; 
 ordering the railroads to give priority 
 to some important commodity, and 
 then controversies arose between the 
 two administrations as to which had 
 supreme authority. Judge Lovett. 
 chairman of the executive board of 
 the Union Pacific, was selected as a 
 priority arbitrator to determine these 
 controversies. 
 
 This incoherent and incompetent 
 management in many instances has 
 unnecessarily interfered with the nor- 
 mal commerce of the people and been 
 disastrous to the country. The Pres- 
 ident, hoping to relieve the situation, 
 has put Tiis Secretary of the Treasury 
 
 in charge of all of the railroads of 
 the United States — a man already 
 greatly over-burdened with work. 
 It is a frantic effort to relieve a dis- 
 astrous situation, which incompetent 
 agencies of the administration have 
 largely brought ajjout. The manner 
 of carrying out such a program is 
 supreme importance to the commer- 
 cial and industrial life of this nation. 
 The people will watch each move with 
 deep concern. 
 
 "MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 1918. 
 
 A SCHEME FRAUGHT WITH 
 GRAVE DANGER. 
 
 The speech of the President relat- 
 ing to the taking over of the rail- 
 roads under the war provisions of the 
 law enacted at the last session of 
 congress and the bill prepared by his 
 direction and introduced simultane- 
 ously with the making of his speech, 
 in some respects, constitute the most 
 amazing incident in American his- 
 tory. 
 
 This measure, prepared in the of- 
 fice of the Attorney General of the 
 United States, turns over the rail- 
 roads to the President and provides 
 for appropriating a half billion dol- 
 lars out of the public funds, to be 
 used as the president sees fit. It 
 gives him authority to do almost 
 anything with the railroads. He can 
 make any kind of extensions or im- 
 provements, and not only spend any 
 amount of public money in so doing 
 but can use the money received from 
 the earnings of the roads at will. 
 He can fix the rates for transporta- 
 tion as he desires. 
 
 He is made a dictator, absolute, 
 of American commerce, unrestrained. 
 He asks for power as vast as the 
 czar of Russia in the days of his 
 greatest supremacy enjoyed. This, 
 taken in connection with other war ( 
 legislation that has already been en- 
 acted, has turned the government of 
 the United States from a representa- 
 tive republic to a dictatorship. 
 
 The President of the United States 
 today is just as much of a dictator 
 as was Mr. Diaz in Mexico, and this 
 proposed law goes beyond anything 
 that the Mexican military autocrat 
 ever assumed. ^ 
 
 Diaz was able to perpetuate him- 
 self in authority in Mexico for thirty 
 
41 
 
 years by exercising the power which 
 he possessed as a dictator. He was 
 nominally re-elected term after term, 
 but the elections represented no ex- 
 pression of public opinion. They 
 were simply forced by the supreme 
 authority of the president himself. 
 
 Whether Mr. Wilson will undertake 
 to set aside all American traditions 
 and perpetuate himself, or his son- 
 in-law, Mr. McAdoo, in the presi- 
 dency remains to be seen. If he 
 undertakes it, whether he will have 
 the power to do so depends upon 
 American public opinion. Whether 
 the love of freedom and individual 
 liberty which characterized the 
 American patriots who established 
 our form of government has departed 
 from the American people and they 
 are willing to become subservient 
 to a supreme authority, as did the 
 Romans, time only can determine. 
 
 However, some of the President's 
 recommendations deserve special con- 
 sideration, especially that one relat- 
 ing to the compensation to be given 
 the railroads for the use of their 
 property. 
 
 He gniarantees them the average 
 earnings of the last three years, or 
 approximately a net revenue of a 
 billion dollars a year; and then gives 
 any railroad the opportunity to claim 
 a greater compensation if it can 
 make a case before the Court of 
 Claims. This opens the doors for 
 unlimited litigation for years and 
 years to come, as anyone familiar 
 with the litigation before the Court 
 of Claims knows. 
 
 War claims from the Revolutionary 
 war, the War of 1812, the Mexican 
 war, and millions of dollars of claims 
 growing out of the Civil war are 
 still pending before that court; and 
 never a session of congress passes 
 but some appropriations are made to 
 pay these century-old claims that in 
 fact have not the slightest merit. 
 But they are worked through by un- 
 scrupulous lobbyists who have picl^ed 
 up these alleged claims for a song in 
 years gone by; and if they can get 
 an appropriation to pay them, it 
 means so much personal gain. The 
 President in this bill, which he de- 
 mands be passed, creates the widest 
 field for such litigation that has yet 
 been opened in the history of the 
 United States. 
 
 The average net profits of the rail- 
 roads during the last three years 
 have been far greater than in any 
 other similar period in American his- 
 tory. They will amount to more 
 than three hundred millions a year 
 in excess of that for any three years 
 preceding the breaking out of the 
 European war. It guarantees many 
 of the railroads from 10 to 25 per 
 cent net returns upon the value of 
 their property; and this is done in 
 the name of justice. The rank and 
 file of the American people who de- 
 pend upon their daily wage for a 
 living are being urged to buy gov- 
 ernment bonds drawing 4% as a 
 patriotic sacrifice, yet in the face of 
 that campaign the president makes 
 this astounding recommendation. 
 Moreover his plan validates every 
 dollar's worth of watered stock that 
 has been set afloat in the last fifty 
 years of disgraceful American rail- 
 way promotion. 
 
 It taxes the American public dur- 
 ing these perplexing war times the 
 enormous sum of at least one-half 
 billion dollars a year to make good 
 to the owners of these railroads, who 
 are largely Wall Street speculators, 
 the most excessive profits that they 
 have ever obtained, and secures them 
 against any industrial or financial re- 
 verses to which the country may be 
 subjected. 
 
 While other business struggles with 
 war taxes and additional burdens im- 
 posed to provide funds for the con- 
 duct of this war, by this bill the 
 owners of the railroad property are 
 exempted not only from any further 
 increase in federal taxes but from 
 the increased taxes provided by the 
 last congress. They are set aside as 
 an excepted class and given privi- 
 leges that no other property owners 
 in the nation are permitted to enjoy. 
 
 Many crimes have been committed 
 in the name of patriotism during the 
 last year. Millions of the public 
 money have been taken from the 
 treasury by the most nauseating cor- 
 ruption, as is being demonstrated by 
 the investigations in Washington; but 
 this is the boldest eflfort to take from 
 the American people billions of dol- 
 lars, for which no adequate return is 
 made, that has ever been attempted 
 in the history of the nation. 
 
 The farmer is pursuing his voca- 
 
42 
 
 tion struggling against the adverse 
 conditions of climate. The weather 
 may prevent him from harvesting 
 that which he has sown. If he har- 
 vests it, the vicissitudes of commerce 
 may prevent him from marketing his 
 product at a profit. 
 
 The merchant contracts for his 
 goods, but industrial or commercial 
 depression may prevent him from dis- 
 posing of them at profitable prices. 
 
 The laborer may have employment, 
 but business stagnation may stop en- 
 terprises and he is then compelled to 
 wander the streets and hunt for 
 work. These are conditions which 
 every farmer, merchant, laborer and 
 business man has confronted in the 
 last generation, and with which he 
 will be confronted again; but the 
 President by this law which he de- 
 mands protects the owners of rail- 
 road property from any of the vicissi- 
 tudes of fortune. He gives them a 
 higher rate of earning than they have 
 ever received in times of peace and 
 guarantees that they shall never re- 
 ceive less regardlss of whatever com- 
 mercial or industrial condition may 
 arise. He assumes all the burdens of 
 operation and maintenance of the 
 railroads and pledges this fabulous 
 amount as profits. 
 
 It would have been far better for 
 the President to have demanded that 
 Congress authorize him to purchase 
 the railroads at a price fixed on 
 the market value of the securities 
 during the last three or five years, 
 or upon their value as found by the 
 Interstate Commerce Commission 
 which is now valuing these prop- 
 erties under the laws of Congress 
 and upon which about $20,000,000 
 have already been expended. Whether 
 we believe in government ownership 
 or not any sane man must concede 
 that such a course would have been 
 far less dangerous than the proposi- 
 tion he has made. The whole scheme 
 is fraught with such possible calam- 
 ity and permeated with such gross 
 injustice to the American taxpayer 
 that it is startling to contemplate 
 and we are delighted to learn that 
 Senator Johnson of California, Cum- 
 mins of Iowa and others do not pro- 
 pose to sit silent and permit this 
 abomination to be enacted into law 
 without a protest. 
 
 SATURDAY, FEBRUA RY 9, 1918 . 
 
 THE BOLDEST RAID YET 
 AUTHORIZED. 
 
 Press reports state that a majority 
 of the Senate Committee has reported 
 the railroad bill to the Senate pro- 
 viding that the compensation of the 
 railroads taken over by the govern- 
 ment shall be the average of the net 
 revenues for the last three years. 
 
 This will provide the highest com- 
 pensation that the railroads have ever 
 received from the American people 
 during a similar period of time. It 
 is vehemently said by the President 
 and other responsible administrative 
 officers that the war should not be 
 made a pretext for acquiring profit; 
 that great corporations should not 
 be permitted to make money out of 
 the war. Yet this administration bill 
 guarantees to the railroads a larger 
 return by far than they have ever 
 received during a similar period in 
 times of peace, and agrees that in 
 the event the revenues of these roads, 
 because of any industrial condition, 
 do not meet this guarantee that 
 there shall be money taken out of the 
 public treasury to m"^ke it up to 
 them. That is, it removes the great 
 railways of this country from any 
 danger of industrial depression that 
 may come during the pejiiod of the 
 war, and singles these corporations 
 out for special favor. It not only, 
 guarantees that the property shall 
 be maintained in first class condition 
 at the government's expense; that ex- 
 tensions needed will be made at the 
 government's expense; but that a de- 
 preciation fund shall be provided out 
 of the earnings before the net profits 
 are determined. 
 
 That is, these railway corporations 
 are protected from any loss of any 
 kind, pending the war and are guar- 
 anteed a higher return than they 
 ever received prior to the war. ' 
 
 But the most offensive feature of 
 the bill is that all of the railroads 
 are not taken over. As a matter of 
 fact only the railroads in which the 
 Wall Street speculators are interested 
 wil receive the benefit of any such • 
 guaranties. The small roads that 
 are owned by private investors or 
 small banks in different sections of 
 the country, like the Salina Northern. 
 
43 
 
 the Anthony & Northern and a hun- 
 dred similar small railways that have 
 been constructed in opposition to the 
 great existing, dominating, monopo- 
 lizing lines are left out. No guar- 
 anty is given them. 
 
 The investors in these small rail- 
 ways not only receive no guaranty 
 from the government, but the testi- 
 mony before the committee in Wash- 
 ington demonstrates that many of 
 them are being gravely injured by 
 the government operation, and the 
 revenue which they were able to ob- 
 tain by traffic arrangements which 
 they had entered into with compet- 
 ing lines before the government took 
 over the big systems is being taken 
 from them. 
 
 It is the boldest raid that has ever 
 been made on the public treasury by 
 any organization of Wall Street spec- 
 ulators, and it guarantees to these 
 big railroads, after all interest on 
 bonds, taxes and dividends on pre- 
 ferred stock is paid, a return of from 
 6 to 25 per cent net upon their capi- 
 tal stock, nine-tenths of which repre- 
 sents not a dollar of invested capital. 
 
 Never before in the history of the 
 United States would the Wall Street 
 financiers have had the nerve to sug- 
 gest such a piece of legislation; but 
 under the stress of war conditions 
 they think that now is the time for 
 them to -get their hands into the pub- 
 lic treasury, and be guaranteed by 
 the government against any of the in- 
 dustrial or financial exigencies that 
 may grow out of the war. Other 
 business may fail. Other concerns 
 that produce the necessities of life 
 or the commodities that the people 
 must have must take their chances. 
 They get no guaranty from the public 
 treasury. But the big railroads re- 
 eardless of industrial condition may 
 levy a tribute upon the people to 
 make good their enormous profits. 
 
 ~ FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 15^Ydis. 
 
 GIVE US HONEST AND EF- 
 FICIENT ADMINISTRATION. 
 
 A recent issue of the Kansas City 
 Star had a very creditable editorial 
 upon the bill which the President has 
 had introduced in Congress conferring 
 upon him autocratic and dictatorial 
 powers, practically authorizing him 
 to- take charge and run the govern- 
 
 ment as he pleases regardless of the 
 statutes or any of the co-ordinate 
 branches. 
 
 It is the first time in American 
 history that the president of the 
 United States has sought to set aside 
 all constitutional limitations as a war 
 measure. When the life of this 
 nation was threatened, with open re- 
 bellion, with the capital permeated 
 with treason and surrounded by re- 
 bellious territory, President Lincoln 
 took up the administration of affairs, 
 but never dreamed of asking for any- 
 thing like the authority which has al- 
 ready been conferred on President 
 Wilson. 
 
 A week rarely passed that Con- 
 gress is not asked to confer some 
 additional power on the president. 
 Already he has been given too much, 
 as has forcibly been demonstrated by 
 the mismanagement of the fuel ad- 
 ministration as well as the food ad- 
 ministration. 
 
 If no director of fuel had been ap- 
 pointed, the American people would 
 have suffereded far less during the 
 winter than they have. Mr. Garfield's 
 orders largely precipitated the con- 
 gestion and increased the difficulties 
 rather than relieved them. 
 
 Doubtless the unfortunate blunders 
 made some kind of curtailment neces- 
 sary when the suffering became 
 acute. However, the orders* for cur- 
 tailment were ridiculous. Thousands 
 and thousands of men have had their 
 business seriously interfered with 
 when it did not in the slightest de- 
 gree conserve the coal supply. 
 
 Fortunately, nature has relieved 
 the country from the calamity of 
 the fuel administration; but not so 
 with the food administration. The 
 cattle feeders of the nation have had 
 their business this year practically 
 ruined. Millions of dollars have been 
 lost by them through the unwise and 
 arbitrary action of Mr. Hoover. 
 
 The wheat producer has been in- 
 jured more than any other of our 
 agricultural producers, and the con- 
 sumer has not been benefitted. He 
 is continually being harassed with im- 
 practical and useless orders. 
 
 The ship-building program has 
 been a farce. It cannot be said to 
 have broken down, because it never 
 was successfully started. It has been 
 the rendezvous for political grafters 
 
44 
 
 from the beginning. Yet the Presi- 
 dent in the face of these deplorable 
 failures, is asking for still more 
 power as corrective legislation. 
 
 What the country now demands is 
 the proper exercise of the power that 
 he has, the efficient administration of 
 the great departments of the govern- 
 ment that are under his charge, and 
 not the vehement demand for an in- 
 crease in autocratic power and 
 further encroachments by the execu- 
 tive upon our legislative institutions. 
 Give the people efficient and honest 
 administration and they will stand 
 for any amount of sacrifice necessary 
 for the honor and welfare of the 
 nation. 
 
 •SATURDAY^FEBRUARY 16, 1918. 
 
 AN UNFORTUNATE SITUATION. 
 
 We are glad to know that Senator 
 Martin, Democratic leader of the sen- 
 ate, refused to introduce the bill 
 which if it passes will make an elec- 
 tive dictator out of the President of 
 the United States and which would 
 Mexicanize this republic. It would 
 confer upon President Wilson greater 
 power than Diaz ever exercised in 
 Mexico and reduce the legislative 
 branch of our government to still 
 further impotency. 
 
 Complaint is frequently made that 
 men of commanding strength and 
 ability no longer seek places in the 
 House of Representatives. This, un- 
 fortunately, is true. The reduction 
 of the House of Representatives to 
 that of merely a ratifying body, mak- 
 ing it as impotent as the Mexican 
 congress or the British House of 
 Lords, is more than anything else 
 responsible for the mediocre char- 
 acter of so many of our members of 
 Congress. 
 
 It is surprising that in the Fifth 
 C<mgressional district men of intel- 
 lectual strength and standing do not 
 now aspire to Congress. When it is 
 remembered that this district has 
 been represented by such men as 
 William A. Phillips, John A. Ander- 
 son, and W. A. Calderhead, men 
 who took high rank in the councils 
 of the nation, it is surprising that a 
 me<Kocre nonentity like the present 
 member should have practically an 
 open field for re-election. 
 
 Is it because men of intellect and 
 
 spirit no longer see an opportunity 
 for service in the House? Is it be- 
 cause that body no longer stands 
 for achievement, and for the develop- 
 ment of important governmental pol- 
 icies that it is no longer a House 
 filled with able representatives of the 
 people who formulate the laws of the 
 nation, as in the days of Clay, Col- 
 fax, Reed, McKinley and other great 
 leaders. 
 
 If so, it is time that the legisla- 
 tive branch of the government pro- 
 tect itself, by asserting some inde- 
 pendent thought, and formulating 
 some constructive policies of govern- 
 ment. It is for Congress to deter- 
 mine the policies of the government 
 and for the executive to execute 
 them. When the legislative branch 
 abandons its constitutional rights and 
 prerogatives and turns them over to 
 the executive as the prices of politi- 
 cal patronage and plunder, this re- 
 public then begins the first stage of 
 decline. It has been the history of 
 every free government from the be- 
 ginning of time that when the rep- 
 resentatives of the people sacrifice 
 their constitutional rights, the 
 strength and virility of the republic 
 is declining, and the usurpation of 
 authority by the executive begins. 
 
 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1918. 
 
 SHOULD BE LESS RESPECTABLE 
 AND MORE DANGEROUS. 
 
 The Hog Island shipbuilding plant 
 scandal has at last attracted the 
 attention of Mr. Wilson. The reck- 
 less waste of public money, graft, 
 and plunder that have run rampant 
 in the affairs of this government for 
 the last six or eight months has here- 
 tofore been ignored. 
 
 Some distinguished dollar a. year 
 "patriots" like Vanderlip and other 
 captains of high finance, such as 
 Rockefeller of the Standard Oil Com- 
 pany, Stillman of the City National 
 Bank, Vail of the American Tele- 
 graph and Telephone Company, and 
 a number of others early in the war 
 organized the International Ship- 
 building Corporation. They were not 
 shipbuilders. They were financiers. 
 There was then organized subsidiary 
 corporations that were to do the 
 work. These patriots put no money 
 in the enterprise. The government 
 
45 
 
 furnished all of it, even paying the 
 salaries of the corporation officers. 
 It purchased the land upon which the 
 plaUt was to be erected, paying- an 
 army officer $2,000 an acre for it, 
 though a short time before he had 
 offered it to the government for 
 $1,000. It has been assessed at $100 
 per acre. This army officer received 
 one million dollars for land that was 
 practically worthless. The govern- 
 ment provided the men and the me- 
 chanics to do all the work. The cor- 
 poration did not invest a dollar nor 
 assume any risks; yet it was to be 
 paid between six and seven million 
 dollars out of the public treasury. 
 
 This scheme was denounced and 
 criticised weeks ago — indeed months 
 ago — ^but it attracted no attention. 
 Finally the twenty-one millions of 
 dollars appropriated for the construc- 
 tion of this ship building yard ran 
 out and twenty-one millions more 
 were demanded. Congress when 
 called on for the deficiency appro- 
 priation began to inquire what had 
 become of the money already ap- 
 propriated, and a congressional in- 
 vestigation has developed another of 
 the nauseating scandals which have 
 been so numerous in Mr. Wilson's 
 administration since the war began. 
 
 It is so offensive and the names of 
 80 many of the dollar "patriots" 
 are connected with it that the Presi- 
 dent feels that it needs some of his 
 attention. It is no worse than hun- 
 dreds of similar instances, except 
 that it is of greater magnitude. It 
 is no more criminal than the James- 
 town loot, the fire arms contract, the 
 machine gun contract, the woolen 
 cloth scandal, the shoe contracts, the 
 aluminum contracts and many others 
 too numerous to mention. 
 
 It is simply a continuation of the 
 same policy that was pursued in 
 the construction of cantonments, the 
 building of wooden ships, the supply- 
 ing of equipment to the army. Al- 
 most every article used in our mili- 
 tary establishment is involved in 
 some of these scandals. 
 
 It is now hoped that the Depart- 
 ment of Justice will prosecute with 
 some vigor the thieves who have been 
 plundering and looting the public 
 treasury so thoroughly during recent 
 months. If Mr. Wilson will follow 
 the example of McKinley and Roose- 
 
 velt and make corruption in public 
 life less respectable and more dan- 
 gerous he will have our hearty sup- 
 port in such a righteous fight. 
 
 THU^SDAYJEBgUARY 21, **1918. 
 
 MUST CONQUER THE SUB- 
 MARINE. 
 
 There is a frantic demand through- 
 out the nation, for the production of 
 ships, and they cite the frightful re- 
 sults of the submarine warfare in 
 sinking two tons of shipping to every 
 one built by the Americans and Eng- 
 lish last year. If we are correctly 
 informed by the press dispatches, six 
 million tons of shipping were sent to 
 the bottom of the seas last year by 
 German submarines, while the con- 
 struction in both England and the 
 United States has been less than 
 three million tons. If we increase the 
 production of ships what assurance 
 have we that the Germans will not 
 increase their destruction? 
 
 Not only were six million tons of 
 shipping sunk last year but millions 
 of tons of food products went with 
 them. Last month, we are advised, 
 seven million bushels of wheat were 
 sunk. The American people are 
 called upon to deny themselves the 
 comforts of life, to banish from their 
 homes the meat they have been ac- 
 customed to live upon, in order that 
 we may help our allies in Europe, 
 and this food which we deny our- 
 selves does not reach the allies, but 
 does reach the bottom of the sea. 
 
 This is a startling demonstration 
 that what the allies need now is more 
 effective means of combating the sub- 
 marine. To build more ships seems 
 to be a vain effort to gorge this de- 
 structive monster with more ships 
 than he can consume instead of de- 
 stroying the monster; and if the navy 
 department, or the shipping corpora- 
 tion, or the army will concentrate 
 their energies upon and invite the 
 best thought of the world to solve the 
 problem as to how the submarine is 
 to be defeated instead of making a 
 frantic effort to build more ships 
 than the Germans can sink, we will 
 more surely approach the end of the 
 war and ultimate victory. 
 
46 
 
 MONDAY, MARCH 11, 1918. 
 
 HAVE WE BEEN RIGHT? 
 
 We are engaged in the most terri- 
 ble military conflict in the history 
 of the human race. The resources of 
 the American people are going to be 
 tested to the limit. It is absolutely 
 necessary for the welfare of this 
 country that the masses of the people 
 who must bear the tremendous bur- 
 dens of this war, both in the sacri- 
 fice of earnings and the shedding of 
 blood, shall feel that they are being 
 fairly treated by their government. 
 No free government can live without 
 the hearty and loyal support of the 
 great body of the people. 
 
 The profits of some of the great 
 industrial enterprises, chargeable di- 
 rectly to the war, have been compiled 
 from their annual reports. The fol- 
 lowing table shows the average 
 profits of each of these concerns for 
 five years before the war, embracing 
 the years 1911 to 1915 inclusive, and 
 for the years 1916 and 1917. The 
 vast increases in their profits directly 
 traceable to the war are apparent. 
 
 It should be remembered that these 
 are net profits after all excess war 
 taxes are deducted. What burden 
 are war taxes to these industries? 
 The packers after paying their excess 
 war tax have still increased their 
 profits from three to five hundred 
 
 per cent over those of peaceful times. 
 All of these concerns could be tax-ed 
 
 80 per cent of the excess war p^jpfits 
 and still make from 50 to 500Tf)er 
 cent more than during times of peace. 
 We ask every reader of the Journal 
 to examine carefully this lable. 
 
 These concerns deal in food, cloth- 
 ing, domestic necessities and war ma- 
 terials. Their profits are enormous — 
 made so largely by charging the peo- 
 ple and the government extortionate 
 prices. 
 
 Mr. Wilson's administration has 
 been given unlimited power by Con- 
 gress to correct such abuses as this 
 table so forcibly illustrates. 
 
 Will the people have confidence in 
 an administration that having been 
 given the power to stop, not only per- 
 mits, but apparently justifies such 
 shameless exploitations of the re- 
 sources of the nation. Is it not more 
 criminal, or treasonable, if you 
 please, to take advantage of the con- 
 ditions brought about by this terrible 
 war to charge the people extortionate 
 prices for the necessities of life and 
 thereby amass such fabulous fortunes 
 than to oppose the draft or steal a 
 pair of shoes? 
 
 For months we have been protest- 
 ing against the neglect, incompetence 
 and corruption that has resulted not 
 only in permitting these grave abuses, 
 but others equally infamous. Have 
 we been right? 
 
 NET EARNINGS OR PROFITS. 
 
 Average 5 years 
 
 1911 to 1915 1916 1917 
 
 Armour & Co. (packers) $ 6,559,960 $ 20,100,000 $ 30,628,156 
 
 Morris & Co. (packers) 1,858,697 3,632,213 10,358,489 
 
 Swift & Co. (packers) 9,435,000 20,465,000 34,650,000 
 
 American Can Co 4,998,079 7,962,982 21,995,042 
 
 American Steel Foundries Co.... 220,252 3,418,057 8,718,296 
 
 American Sugar Refining Co.... ^ 4,012,966 9,756,379 10,055,291 
 
 American Woolen Co 2,428,735 5,863,819 6,844,146 
 
 Bethlehem Steel Corporation 6,515,631 43,593,968 52,651,431 
 
 Brown Shoe Co 482,225a 1,467,757 2,414,088 
 
 Central Leather Co 4,384,446 15,489,201 16,243,062 
 
 Cuban-American Sugar Co 1,905,947 8,235,113 10,821,960 
 
 Lackawanna Steel Co 920,833 12,218,234 16,106,976 
 
 United States Steel Corp'n 58,017,583 271,531,730 331,668,131 
 
 United Fruit Co 4,619,912 11,943,151 17,592,391 
 
 aAverage for three years. 
 
47 
 
 MONDAY, MARCH 18, 1918. 
 
 t, "whUt are you for?" 
 
 KA few days since a friend said that 
 BI read our editorials carefully and 
 thought they were strong and sound. 
 "But," he added, "while they forcibly 
 show what you are against, they do 
 not so clearly state what you are 
 for." 
 
 To satisfy this and other inquiring 
 friends, we will repeat that first, and 
 above all else, we favor economy in 
 public expenditure and honesty and 
 efficiency in the public service. These 
 we regard as of the greatest import- 
 ance to the administration of any gov- 
 ernment. They are issues of the first 
 magnitude and are far more essential 
 in times of war, when tremendous 
 sacrifices are demanded of the people, 
 than in times of peace. 
 
 In the management of our national 
 affairs, therefore, we favor the sub- 
 stitution of honesty for dishonesty, 
 of competency for incompetency and 
 of patriotic devotion for intrigue and 
 graft. 
 
 We have been of the opinion that 
 when the European war began, if the 
 government of the United States had 
 > been in the hands of far-sighted 
 statesmen of courage, sagacity and 
 determination, we not only would 
 have kept out of the war ourselves, 
 but greatly ameliorated its European 
 horrors. Unfortunately, for us and 
 mankind such was not the case, and 
 now we must deal with the things 
 that are and not those that might 
 have been. 
 
 We, therefore, hold that it is the 
 ^duty of every American citizen to do 
 his best for the prosecution of the 
 war to a successful conclusion. Our 
 diers in camp and field must be 
 u )vided with every military facility 
 within the reach of human genius 
 ai,d every comfort that love and de- 
 votion can provide. This, we not 
 only owe them as a profound ooliga- 
 tion, but is necessary that ultimately 
 peace based upon justice and right- 
 eousness shall prevail throughout the 
 nations of the earth. 
 
 When the time for the discussion of 
 peace comes, the first requirement in 
 a treaty should be disarmament on 
 both land and sea. An international 
 
 \ compact of the great nations should 
 
 be formed; and it should be stipu- 
 lated, with ample provision for its 
 enforcement, that no nation shall 
 maintain a standing army or possess 
 military equipment or the facilities 
 for manufacturing of such in excess 
 of the requirements necessary to pre- 
 serve domestic order: That the great 
 naval armaments should be reduced 
 in size so there would remain only 
 a sufficient number of armed vessels 
 properly to police the seas and pre- 
 vent pira'cy. 
 
 For a nation like Germany to 
 maintain a military establishment 
 which practically makes the empire 
 an armed camp with millions of 
 soldiers ready for battle on. a week's 
 notice is a menace to the welfare of 
 the human race. 
 
 The freedom of the seas also is as 
 essential as the freedom of the land. 
 A navy which overshadows those of 
 all competing nations is dangerous 
 to the commerce of the world. Such 
 armaments are an excessive burden 
 upon the resources of the human 
 race and stand as a menace to the 
 peace and happiness of mankind. 
 
 The national boundaries of Euro» 
 pean countries are matters that affect 
 the people immediately concerned and 
 not Us and should be settled by them. 
 
 Whether Great Britain, Italy, 
 France, Belgium, Germany or Rus- 
 sia shall have a monarchial, republi- 
 can or socialistic form of govern- 
 ment is for the people of these 
 countries to determine and not for 
 us. What we are interested in is 
 that whatever form of government 
 they may choose to live under shall 
 not have the power or be permitted 
 to endanger the peace of the world, 
 or impose unjust burdens upon other 
 peoples. 
 
 The woeful failure of the war de- 
 partment to meet the tremendous re- 
 sponsibilities imposed upon it by the 
 war, and the refusal of the Presi- 
 dent to appoint a secretary of that 
 department capable of managing it 
 efficiently make absolutely necessary 
 the creation by Congress of a war 
 council composed of men who shall 
 devote their entire time to the work 
 of the administration of the vast 
 agencies of the war. 
 
 The revenue bill should be amended 
 this year so as to tax excess war 
 
48 
 
 profits not less than 80 per cent, 
 and if need be, later this should be 
 increased to 90 per cent. 
 
 A statute should be enacted mak- 
 ing it a felony for any public officer 
 or governmental agent, directly or in- 
 ilirectly, to profit financially by any 
 contract over which he has super- 
 vision. 
 
 As part of the military expendi- 
 tures of the United States reservoirs 
 should be located and constructed on 
 the great plain between the foot hills 
 of the Rocky Mountains and the 98th 
 meridian so as to impound the run- 
 off waters and hold them back until 
 the growing seasons when they can 
 be used for agricultural purposes. 
 This would lessen the destruction by 
 floods and ameliorate the disaster by 
 drouth. 
 
 Unless officers can be appointed to 
 control the food and fuel administra- 
 tions in the interests of the public 
 and protect the producers from ex- 
 tortion, the laws creating these 
 agencies should be repealed. To ap- 
 point men to positions of great power 
 who are under the control of great 
 industrial corporations like the sugar 
 trust, the packers' combination, and 
 coal barons, is a menace to the wel- 
 fare of the nation. 
 
 The plan by which the present ad- 
 ministration has taken over the rail- 
 roads is the worst that could have 
 been devised. It has resulted in both 
 insufficient and inefficient service and 
 in the increasing of rates and charges 
 that will result in imposing a tre- 
 mendous financial burden upon the 
 people. 
 
 It guarantees to the Wall Street 
 owners of the great railway systems 
 enormous returns upon their holdings 
 of watered stocks, and taxes millions 
 of the common people who live 
 meagerly under the stress of war 
 times to pay these conscienceless 
 stock gamblers and speculators fabu- 
 lous returns on securities that do not 
 represent the investment of a single 
 dollar in transportation facilities. 
 
 The plan adopted by the President 
 has practically abolished the Inter- 
 state Commerce Commission and the 
 state railway commissions and has 
 placed in the hands of a political 
 
 appointee, the secretary of the treaa 
 ury, the most tremendous power ov(. 
 the commerce of a people ever heU 
 by any individual in the history 
 civilized government. He may change 
 rates or the relation of rates without 
 notice or hearing. He has in hi» 
 hands four billion dollars of tax 
 collected for transportation, that 
 can spend at will. He can increase 
 decrease the wages of two milli 
 of employees and pay them any si 
 he desires without restraint of 
 or law. No system could have 
 devised more dangerous. 
 
 Instead of this there ought to h; 
 been^ organized a federal corporate 
 with a board of directors appoin 
 by the President, holding office for 
 long term of years and removab] 
 only for cause. The stock of t! 
 corporation should be owned by tl 
 people. It should have acquired tl 
 railroads at a fair market value ai 
 operated them as a unified systei 
 All the regulatory authority, st* 
 and national should have been p 
 served. Such a plan would have al 
 the advantages of government own^ 
 ship and none of its dangers, 
 would have all of the flexibility 
 private ownership and none of i 
 weaknesses and injustices. 
 
 We are strongly in favor of a 
 publican form of government, 
 therefore most earnestly prot 
 against the abdication by Congress 
 the law-making functions confem 
 upon it by the federal constituti 
 We believe the law-making poWj 
 should be vested in the represen' 
 tives of the people and not in 
 elective dictator. 
 
 We trust these declarations are sal 
 factory to our inquiring friend 
 there are any other questions thai 
 he or any others desire to ask, we 
 shall be pleased to further elaborate 
 our views upon any matters of pub- 
 lic concern. 
 
 We have nothing to conceal. We 
 do not intend to stand for one plat- 
 form today and repudiate it tomor- 
 row. We do not have one platform 
 to get in on and another to live by 
 after we are in. 
 
 JOSEPH L. BRISTOW. 
 
 I 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 Fine schedule: 25 cents on first day overdue 
 
 50 cents on fourth day overdue 
 One dollar on seventh day overdue. 
 
 iViAY 1 1947 
 
 ma: 4 'Sss 
 
 LD 21-1007»-12,'46(A2012sl6)4120 
 
Pamphlet ^ 
 Binder 
 Gaylord Bros.. Inc. ■ 
 Stockton, Calif. 
 T.M. Reg. U.S. Pat. Off 
 
 U C, BERKELEY LIBRARIES