UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES / y n..-^ ATALANTA, By ALGERNON C. SWINBURNE. Fcap. 8vo, cloth, 6s. John Camden Hottex. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. "He has produced a dramatic poem which abounds from the first pasre to the last in the finest constituents of poetry— in iniattinatinn, fancy, fejling, sentiment, passicm, and knowledge of the human heart and soul, combined with a dominant mastery over every species of verse, from the stateliest pimp of epic metre to the fluent sweetness of soncr. ... He has something of that creative force which all great poets have Ind, whether they were Greek, Italian, or Knglish — a native and inborn strength, v\hich scholarship may mould, but can never originate. If, as we are given to undersiand, Jlr. Swin- burne is a young writer, we do not hesit:ite to assert that his volume is extra- ordinary, not simply for strength and vividness of imagination, but (what is far more remarkable with inexperience) for maturity of power, for complete- ness of self-control, for absolute mastery over the turbulent lorces of ado- lescent genius. . . . That strange, sad, h ipeless mood in which the ancient Greek regarded the mysteries of life and death— that austere setting of the soul aurainst the iron will of destiny which is so full of an immense dignity aid pathos— that divinely sorrowful desp ir of things which can sutler to t e miserable end, and sees no after c 'mpensatiun, and yet goes down to death in majesty, and beauty, and power — Ihe-e charuL-teristics of the old Greek fiith, or want of faith, or whitsoever we may call it, are re- flected by Mr. S.vinburne with amazing trutii and discrimination. There are passages in his poem which seem to wring from the very roots of human experience the sharpest extract of our griefs." — London KkviiiW, Sth April, 1865. " .Mr. Swinburne has judged well in his choice of a sub'eet. The legend of Calylon i-^ one of the most beautiful in the who!e compass of the dreek my- thology; fresh, simple, romantic, solemn, and pathetic, yet without any of those horrors which shock us in the stories of 1 hebes or Argos— ni Juca-ta, no Thyestes, but figures full of heroic truth and nobleness, standing out in the clear bright light of the early morning of Greece. ... A caretul study of the Attic dramatists has enabled him to catch their mann t, and to reproduce felicitously many of their turns of expression. The scholar is struck, every few lines, by some phrase which he can fancy a direct translation from the Greek, while yd it is in its place both forcible anj unalfjcted. The matter, altboiitrh not really (ircok in its esse ice, is tliro^vn with jrreat clcTcrness into a moulil which almost bciruilcs us into f >r:.'etliii^ tlic author, and iina^^iiiin^ that we are Usteiiiuff to one of the conieinpurarics of ICuripiJcs who soufflit to copy the manner of yEsebylus. . . . He is, indeed, never more happy than in painliii;; nature, knowing and lovin; her well, and inspired hy her beauty into a vivid force and fulness of expression." — Saturday Kbvikw, 6th May, 1865. " The pa-sion of Althaea is much the finest part of the play. The naturalism of nialernal instinct stniir;;linir with the feeliiis; of what is due to the shade of her mother and her brothers, g.)cs far beyond the stru^i^le in Anti;rone or Orestes. Out of many no'.ile passages depicting this feeling we choose the last and most pissimate — passionate beyond the limits of Greek passion, and too little ingrained with the Greek awe, — but still exceedingly fine." — Spkctatou, April loth, 18(35. " He is gifted with no small portion of the all-important divine fire, without which no man can hope to achieve poetic success ; he possesses considerable poweis of description, a keen eye for natural scenery, and a copious vocabulary of rich yet simple Kn:,'lish. . . . We must now part from our author with c irdial congratulations on the success with which he has achieved so difficult a task." — TiuKS, June 6th, 18fi5. " ' Atalanta in Calydon ' is the work of a poet. . . . Let our readers say whether they often meet with pictures lovelier in themselves or more truly Greek than those in the following invocation to Artemis. . . . Many strains equal to the al>ove in force, beauty and rhythmical flow might be cited from the chorus. Those which set forth the brevity of man's life, and the darkness which cnlolils it, though almost irreverent in their impeachment of the gods, are singularly fine in expression. . . . We yet know not to what poet since Keats we could turn for a representation at once so large in its design and so graphic in its parti .ulars. In the noble hyperbole of description which raises the boar into the veritable scuurge of Artemis, there is imagination of the high st kind. . . .'V subject for many a painter to come— a grand word-picture, in which the inlhiencc of no contemporary can be traced. ... In the fervour ami beauty of his best p issagcs we find no rcHectidn of any modern wr.ter. . . . We must not close without a reference to the Greek lines, plaintive and full of classic grace, which ihe writer has prefixed to his work in honour of Walter Savage Landor."— ATHBN.SCM, April lut, 1865. " The choruses are so good, that it is difficult to praise them enouu'h. Were our space unlimited, we would transfer them without abridgment to our columns; as it is not, we can only give a few extracts ; but we may fairly assume that every one who cares for poetry of a truly high order will make himself familiar with Mr. Swinburne's drama. ... As we listen to them they seem to set them- selves to a strange but grand music, which lingers long on the ear Somitimes we are reminded of Shelley in the lyric passages, but it is more the movement of the verse and its wonderful music, than anything else which sngerests a resemblance. . . . Mr. Swinburne has lived with the trreat Athenian driniutists till his tone of thoua-ht has somewhat assimilated to theirs, but he has learnt rather to sympathize with them as a contemporary artist, than to copy them as a modern student." — Reader, April 22nd, 1865. " Our extracts have shown that we mui'h prefer to let Mr. Swinburne present his own marvellous earnestness and rich delivery of manner than to essay in this, our necessarily brief review, a lengthened citieism or analysis of such a remarkable work of promise. Apart from the serious endeavour and hiirh devoir to which he has devoted him'-elf in his first appeal to public attent'on, we woull remark the sensuousness, brilliancy, and fervour of the lyrics, which here and there relieve the more sombre and sterner phases of the roem. . . . Assuredly this is the choicest and most complete effort which has for a lon^ t'rae an- nounced that a scholar and a poet has come amongst us."— Moe.\ing Hekalii, April 27th, 1865. " One grave error, which Mr. Swinburne has almost entirely avoided, is the use of thoughts or expressions which, current now, would be out of place in a tragedy of Greece. He has, with rare artistic feeling, let scarcely a tiace appear of modern life. The Poem is all alive with the life of a classic past . . . . The whole play is instinct with power of varied kinds." — Examinee, Jul;/ \5th, 1865. "We have before said Mr. Swinburne is a subtle analyst of human motive, and possesses great tragic power. The present work shows him to have imagination of the highest order, wonderful play of fancy, and a complete command over every form of versification. ... He has command of imagery as great as his control of language. He has power which rises to sublimity ; passion which deepens into terror; daring which soars beyond reach or control • . . . We have said enough to oonvince our readers that we regard this poem as a worthy companion to ' Chastelard,' and loo'.c upon its author as per- manently enrolled among great English poets."— Sunday Times, D^ce/rtiec 31s^, 1865. "These lines are marked by that melancholy that always characterizes the poetry in proportion to the absence of faith. . . . Could he have faith, of which there is not a trace throughout the poem, except the miserable vacuum created by its absence, he might do wonders as a poet."— The Tablet, August Uth, 1865. "As to the tragedy itself, we find in it everything to praise and nothing to censure. It is one of the few really great poems that have been contributed to English literature since the death of Shelley; and it entitles its autlior at once to a place among the great poets of his country. ... A tragedy on the Grecian model, which is remarkable for its intense emotional vitality, the richness and reality of its imaginative images, the perfect precision and finish of its con- struction, and the combined stateliness, severity, and music of its diction." — Albion, November Wh, 1865. " Not the least remarkable and interesting pages of this volume are those to which the author has consia-ncd a tribute of veneration to the memory of AValter Savajre Landor, in two compnsilions of Greek elegiac verse. The lirst is a fleilieal ion addressed to li'ndor while liviiisr, in the form of a valediction, on the occasion of his last return to Italy; the second, much the longer of the two, an eleary on his death. No one who has felt how the spirit of the j'Ksi-hylean trasedy breathes through the English jwem, will have been sur- prised t) find— ra'.her, every su di reader would have been disappointed if he hid not f)nnd— tint Mr. Swinburne's thoufjhts move with scarcely less ease and freedom on a moderm theme (if indeed I,andor may be properly said to beliin'T to his own a^e so mu di as to tint of Pericles and Augustus) in the lanLfuagre and measures of Callinus and .Mimmerus than in his native speech, or the Greek we will oidy say that it is not that nf a Cambridge prize ode, but something much better— even if more open to minute criticism— than the best of such ; not in the least like a cento of dainty classical phrases, but the fre-ih original gushing of a true poetical vein, nourislied by a mastery of the foreign language, like that which Landor himself in his Latin poems .... It is evidcnily the produce, not of the tender lyrical faculty which so often waits on sensitive youth and afterwards fades into the light of common day, nor even of tlie classical culture of which it is itself a signal illustration, but of :m atllueut and apprehensive genius, which, with ordinary care and fair fortune, will take a foremost place in Knglish literature. . . . His abstinence from all overilrawn conceits is remarkable in a young poet of any time, and his careful avoidance of the shadowy boriler land of metaphysics and poetry in which so many ver>ificrs of our own day take refuge from the open scrutiny of critical sunlight, deserve full praise and recognition." — Edinbuegh Hkview, Juli/, 18G5. C1IASTEL.\RD. Br ALGERNON C. SWINBURNE. Fcap. 8vo, clotb, 7s. John Camden Hotten. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. " TnE portraits of Mary and of Chastelard are exaggerated, but only as Michael Amrclo's heroic statues are. The consistent steady madness of Cliastelard's passion, which, mad as it is, lies deeper than madness, and, wild as it ■is, burns always without fianie, is displayed in a way which is most masterly. As for the Queen, we are quite of opinion that Mr. Swinburne has brought that woman to light again. It will not do, perhaps, to peer closely into her portrait as it lies in these pasres ; if we do, we beeonie uneasily conscious of blotchy workmanship, with lights too sutlden, and shades too deep, and broken harmonies of colour. But close the book, and look at the portrait reflected from it into the mind, and none was ever painted of her so true. It is a portrait which painters and historians alike have only confused; it awaited a poet's hand to this day. and now we have got it. So think we, at any rate, and in sayin!» so we do not exhaust the praise which is due to the author of ' Ch-istelard.' The dramatic force of the scenes in the latter half of the poem remains to be applauded, but that, luckily for a critic who has come to the end of his tether, is a thing which can oily be applauded and cannot be described; we give it our homage. But it is very much to the purpose of this article, that just when the poem becomes more dramatic its faults begin to disappear; and before we come to the admirable scene between Mary and Chastelard in prison, we are blinded to whatever remains. The fact seems to be that Mr. Swinburne is less a poet than a dr-raatist; it is certain that he is capable of writing in a way which entitles him to small con- sideration as the one, and to great consideration as the other. . . . But in any case it can never be denied that he is a true man of genius." — Pall Mall Gazette, April 27th, 1866. " The two principal figures stand out boldly, and on them the poet has bestowed ail the riches of his genius The scene in which, having sent for Chastelard, she talks to him in a strange wild mood between love and regretful- ness, is extremely subtle and fine It will not be doubted by any one who has the pulse of poetry in his blood that this is noble writing— writing instinct wiih the highest spirit of the Elizabethan Muse. And in the speech of Chastelard, when waiting for the Queen in her chamber, we have something of the large, imperial style of Shakspeare himself. .... The scene between Chastelavd and the Queen in prison is also pervaded with the highest inspirations of impassioned poetry; and though the love-ravings of Chastelard almost pass the bounds comnionh permilted to poets, the shadow of fate, lying dark and heavy over all, seems to cool and moderate the glow. In passages such as these, Mr. Swinburne again proves his right to take a permanent stand among our English poets Of power, he has abundance; of passion, perhaps more than enough ; of poetry, in its fierce, luminous, and fiery shapes, a wonderful and prodigal richness Whatever his faults, however, he is a man of genius of the most unmistakable mark. We do not know when it has fallen to the lot of any poet to produce within one year two such plays as' Atalanta in Calydon' and ' Chastelard '—dramas conceived and written in two totally distinct styles, and with marked success in both He has earned a conspicuous name with singular quickness, and we trust that even greater triumphs lie belore him in his onward path." — London Review, December 9/i, 1865. "The choruses in 'Atalanta' were astonishing for their imaginative insight their richness of imagery, their depth of impassioned thought, the nervous supple- ness of their language, and the lyrical flow of their versification ; and many of the speeches of the characters were full of poetry and dramatic truth. In ' Chastelard,' ajrain, we have a splendid example ol tlie poetry that lies in vehement and absorbing passion; but there is some --eason to fear that Mr. Swinburne is wanting in the hiffher beauty of moral dignity and sweetness." — LoKsoir Bevikw, December 30M, 1865. " We can only say that it abounds in passages of great poetic merit, and the passion of love is described with all that delicacy and vivid, less that can only be found in the writings of a poet endowed with extraordinary genius. Mr. Swinburne has well comprehended the character of Mary Stuart, and she is made to stand before the reader a reality, her nature being wonderfully well exhibited. OthL-r characters are represented with marvelluus distinctness, and give to the tragedy interest and vitality."— Public Opinion, December \Gfh, 1865, " The style is so forcible that there is little that would render the play unfit for the stage, were it not for the great amount of amativeness which the parties have to display before they are disposed of." — Coukt Circulah, December 23rJ, ls65. "The picture with which this burst concludes, though too much ilaborateil, has undeniable grandeur. We could point out passages which, in a dramatic point of view, are yet finer. Tliose given to Mary Beaton — the only touching character in the pby — often reach the height of tragic intensity. Nur is it to lie disputed that Mr. Swinburne shows at times a keen insight into the subtleties of human motive, but his chief characters are out of the pale of our sympathy; besid-s being inherently vicious, the language will oifcnd not only those who have roverence, but those who have taste." — .^thkn.sum, December 23rd, 1S65. " A trage iy — in which we think he best develops his genius. Once before we Slid wp thought his genius essentially lyric, but he himself has convint-ed us, not of tlie contrary, but of the co-existence in him of the dramatic and lyric power." — CouBT JoUBNAL, December 19th, 1865. " The poem, in fact, is morally repulsive, and all its gilding of fancy and feeling only makes the picture more revolting . . . The dramatic power, the grace of the beauty of the tragedy no one ca^ deny. . . . His insight into hidden human motives is marvellously indicated. Altogether, if the poem fails to please, that must be attributed to the subject and the author's mind of it, not to any lai:k of workmanship of the very highest and most delicate order." — Atlas, December 30lh, 1865. " It is an unpleasant book, and one by all means to be kept out of the hands of the young and pure-minded, for the licentiousness of many of the images and profanity of not a few of the sentiments are sui'h as happily are not often found in English poets. . . . We cannot doubt that the le-s sensuous brotherhood of our Northern poets, would join us in denouncing with indignation and disgust such a lamentable prostitution of the English muse." — Joh.v Uull, December 23rd, 1865. " There are two parts of the play deserving of special praise — the second act, and the closing scenes of the fifth. It is in these, and more particularly in the latter, that Mr. Swinburne displays a combination of dramatic and poetic power beyond what is seen in anything that his pen has yet produced. . . . Were it not for their exquisite elegance of expression, these constant exhibitions of passion would deserve severe reprub .tion. . . . Regarding the work as a whole, we must thank .Mr. Swinburne tor a dramatic poem ol' ?reat power, careful elabora- tion of plot, artistic disposition of scenes; for admirable descriptions of human emotion and passion ; for terse, forcible, yet swe> t expression, and a generally scrupulous melody of rhythm." — EEiDER, December 2nd, 1865. " Mr. Swinhurne has written a tragedy, which not only is one of the most remarkable productions of modern days, but which in oriainality of conception and boldness of treatment has ni-ver been surpas-ed. The triumph which Mr. Swinburne has achi ved in 'Chastelard' is the more noteworthy, si ce the splendid gifts of which its composition proclaims him the possessor are totally distinct from those which in ' Atalanta inCalydon' gained him a foremost position among modern poets. In the earlier production, amid all the sublime imagery and lyrical sweetness, the grace truly classic, the boldness of thought and the ex- quisite charm of versification which constituted it a work of accomplished and all but uniivalled beauty, there was no foreshadowing of the dramatic fire and the weird an