mmmm'^'-^i^: 'x.'.,.---t\ -' I GIFT OF SEELEY W. MUDD and GEORGE I. COCHRAN MEYER ELSASSER DR.JOHNR. HAYNES WILLIAM L. HONNOLD JAM ES R. MARTIN MRS. JOSEPH F. SARTOR! to the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BRANCH UKIVERSITY of CALTFOROTT AT LOS ANGELES LIBRAKY PAUL THE POPE AND PAUL THE FRIAP A STORY OF AN INTERDICT. BY T. ADOLPHUS TROLLOPE, AUTHOR OW " FILIPPO STliOZZl : A BIOGRArHT;" "a DECADE OF ITALIAN WOMEN," ETC. ETC. LONDON : CHAPMAN AND IIATJ., lOO, PICCADILLY. 18U1. L0>n50N : BKADBUUY AND EVANS, PRINTERS, WHITEFRIARS. • •• •-•• • •••• • ^ .r-r ^% * -* ht/„ ■3X Tl4p PREFACE. The gi-eat contest between tlie Venetian Republic and the Holy See at the beginning of the seventeenth century, was in its results and bearings on the progress and fortunes of Europe, a far more momentous and memorable event than a mere quarrel between two small Italian States. The contemporary world, indeed, felt it to be so, and interested itself proportionably in the vicissitudes of the struggle. Rome had recently emerged from her greater contest with the principles of the Reformation, sorely diminished indeed as to the extent of the countries and populations subjected to her sway, but with renewed strength and a firmer hold, as many have thought, on those that still owned her supremacy. This quarrel with Venice was the first serious collision with any part of her subjects, after the so-called " restoration " of Catholicism ; the first trial of her renovated strength against a force which the tropes, in the palmy days of the Church, would liave crushed with one blow of the pastoral staif. And the restored and re-invigorated Chuich was defied vi PREFACE. and defeated, with losses, which it has never recovered. The increase of power, which would have accrued to the Holy See, had Kome succeeded in humhling Venice, would have been considerable. But it would have been as nothing to the loss which she sustained by her failure to do so. Reasons have been assigned in the first book of the following story for misdoubting the value of the supposed " restoration " of the CatlioUc Church towards the close of the sixteenth century. The issue of her contest with Venice supplies a further confirmation of the opinion there expressed. But the subsequent history of the Church, from that day to the present, has made evident more than this. It has shown (even to those minds, whicli failed to reach a similar conviction from an a priori, consideration of the constitution and foundations of a Church claiming infallible authority), that the Papacy, not only was not restoredy but was then and evermore unrestorahle ; that it could but continue its path in the straight line in which it had hitherto travelled ; and that this straight line must, at a more or less distant point, come into ii'reconcileable collision with that other straight line, on which mankind was as certainly and inevitably advancing, as surely as two converging lines must sooner or later meet. The two great, but infinitely unequal forces are rushing onwards, each on its appointed path, and the collision point is very near; PREFACE. vii is indeed quite in sight. The wind of the coming shock may already be felt. Or would not the metaphor more correctly represent the fact, if it were said that the crash is akeady in our ears ; and its fii'st conse- quences such as to render its final issue no longer doubtful to any man ? Eonie's first thought, when the terrible moment was upon her, her first instinctive action, was to put her hand to the old weapon, — in truth her only avowable one, — which had once stood her in such good stead. But she dared not draw it forth. She essays to point to it in terrorem ; but her enemies remember the story of the last time it was used; and not only laugh at the threat, but in all seriousness wish that Holy Church would save them some trouble, and some delay, by adopting the suicidal policy of once more attempting to use it. But Rome will do nothing of the kind. The terrible Friar has not been forgotten there. His still formid- able shadow haunts the council-chambers of the Vatican. And the story, on which the reader is about to enter, may be safely accepted as that of the last of the Interdicts. CONTENTS. BOOK I. THE TIME. — « — CHAPTER I. , PAGE Introductory ^ CHAPTER II. Position of the Church and State question in the latter half of the 16ih century. — Restoration of the Church of Rome. — Real value of that restoration. — Hostility between the Church and the World. — Causes of this. — Inevitable effects of Protestantism. — Its working in England. — Awakening of despotic monarchs to the real tendencies of Protestanti.sm. — Consequent alliance between them and R^jrae. — Grounds of quarrel between spiritual and lay despotism. — Rome's claims higher than ever after the Council. — Rome preaches anti-monarchical doctrines. — Opinion of Ranke on the possibilities at that time open to the Catholic Church.— This opinion controverted.— The Council of Trent.— Its right to the title of " CEc-umenical."— Net results of it very different from what was anticijtated. — Real motives of its dccision.s. — Justifica- tion by Faith and by Works. — Rome's meaning of the term " Works."— The claims of Rome to universal supremacy are logical.— The oidy alteniative left to mankind is entire submis- sion or denial of her first principles. —Hut despotic rulers can adopt neither of these alternatives . . . • . . 9 CONTENTS. BOOK TI. THE MEN. CHAPTER I. PAOK Two lawyer Popes. — Similarities and contrasts. — Conscientious bigotry of Paul V. — Effects of the policy of Clement VIII. — Change in the tone of the Church. — Election and death of Leo XI. — Con- clave for the election of Paul V. — Secret history of the Conclaves. — "The Conclavisti." — Regulations for the holding of Conclaves. — Mode of proceeding. — Three methods of electing a Pope. — Difficulty of following all the details of the story of a Conclave. 37 CHAPTER II. The story of a Conclave. — That of Paul V. divided into four parties. — Candidature of Cardinal Saoli. — First scrutiny. — Bellarmine put forward. —Cardinal Montalto at supper. — Pi-oposal to elect Cardinal Camerino. — San Clemen te proposed. — Formal exclusion of him by Montalto's party. — A well-devised move defeated. — Formal exclusion of Cardinal Saoli. — Cardinal Tosco put forward. Montalto's indecision. — He consents to vote for Tosco — That Car- dinal all but elected. — The slip between the cup aud the lip. — Baronius, his charactei". — Prevents the election of Tosco. — Extraordinary scene in the Conclave. — Two hostile camps in the Sistine and Paoline chapels. — Negotiations between them. — Strange scene in the Sistine chapel. — Proposal of Cardinal Borghese. — Cardinal Joyeuse. — Scene in his cell. — Election of Borghfcse — Its consequences ....... 52 CHAPTER III. Character of Paul V. as Pope. — His personal appearance. — Case of Puccinardi. — Paul's superstition and fear of death. — His quarrels with various governments. — France — Naples — Malta — Savoy — Parma — Lucca. — Views of the civil and ecclesiastical power. — Paul's quarrel with Genoa. — Sarpi's character of Paul V. . . 80 CHAPTER IV. Infancy of Fri Paolo. — Natural bent of his mind. — First instructors. — Becomes a Servite Friar. — Scholastic disputations. — Origin and tendency of them. — Sarpi's early scholastic triumphs. — He is made Theologian to the Duke of Mantua. — His claims to scientific CONTENTS. xi PACK discoveries. — Treatises "deomni scibile." — The Duke of Man- tua's joke. — Sarpi is sent to Jlilan by his superiors. — Is accused of heresy. — Acquitted ........ 93 CHAPTER V. Sarpi returns to Venice to lecture on Philosophy. — Become? acquainted ■with Arnauld Ferrier.— Is elected Provincial, — Differences be- tween the Monastic and Mendicant Orders. — The Order of Servites. — Dissensions between different Provinces of the Order. — Chreat meeting of the Order at Parma. —Sarpi elected a Delegate for the reconstitution of the Order. — His sojourn at Rome. — His criminal code. — He is elected Procuratore of the Order. — Friend- ships formed by him at Rome. — Cardinal Castagna. — Quarrels of the Friars. — Fru Dardano. — Fr3, Giulio. — Sarpi's fourth journey to Rome. — Case of the Due de Joyeuse. — Sarpi's friendship and companionship in his studies with Galileo . . . .105 CHAPTER VI. Sarpi as a friar. — Strict in his religious observances. —His sincerity. — Opinions respecting tliis. — Does not attend the Confessional. — His real views with regard to Rome. — The Chronology of the accusa- tions against him. — He fUls to obtain the See of Milopotamus. — • Again is refused tliat of Caorle. — And a third time tliat (if Nona. — Cardinal Bellarmine's reflections on these refusals. — Krror Bellarmiue. — Sarpi's intercourse with the world. — Circle which met at the hou.se of Andrea Morosini. — That at the house of Bernardo Secchini.— lli.s foreign friends. — Visit to Padua. — The eve of the great struggle ........ 124 BOOK III. BRUTUM FULMEN. CHAPTER I. Causes of misunderstanding between Rome and Venice. — The Republic from very early times careful to avoid cccieBiaslical encroach- ment. — False nutioMH of juri.Mprudence. — Tl)c Ubcocks. — The qnarrcl about Ceneda. — liull to forbid travelling in heretical countries. — Extension of tlio prohibitions of the Index to Ve- nice. — I'lume beconies iioHsessod of Ferrara. — QuarreU with Venice ari.ting therefrom. — Quarrels respecting the Investiture of the Patriarch.— These matters influential in causing the refusal of a bishopric to Hat pi 14 ;{ xii CONTENTS. V CHAPTER II. PAGE Paul's selection of Nuncios. — Orazlo Mattel, Nuncio at Venice. — The Pope opens the campaign against Venice. — Count Brandolino, Abbot of Nervesa. — The Canon Saraceni of Vicenza. — His offences. — Paul's dictum on the .sulgection of ecclesiastics to the civil courts. — Venetian laws restraining the multiplication of ecclesiastics and the acquisition of property hy them. — Necessity of such laws. — The Church imprudent in claiming exemption from taxes. — The disputants in this matter in the I7th century avoid appealing to first principles. — Pope Paul's indignation. — The political horizon bodes storm 154 CHAPTER III. Interview between the Pope and the Venetian ambassador. — Tactics of the Venetian Senate. — Paul's complaints. — His passionate bear- ing. — Low ground taken by the ambassador. — Speech of Paul. — The ambassador's reply. — Advantages in ai-gument which he gives to the Pope. — Paul neglects these. — The Nuncio presents himself before the College of State in Venice. — His insolence and violence. — Respect paid to his eccIesiasMcal character. — Reply of the College. — Hostilities between Rome and Venice begin from these two interviews . . . . . . . .165 CHAPTER IV. Ambassadors extraordinary sent to E.ome by the Republic — The Pope's fraudulent trickery in the matter of calling the Patriarch to Rome. — Negotiations and delays. — Paul led to farm false hopes by the Jesuits. — Views and expectations of the Republic. — Report of the ambassador's second audience. — Bad political economy of the Senate. — Violent threats of the Pope. — Fresh instructions from the Senate to the ambassador. — Unanimous vote of the Senate on the reply to be made to the Nuncio. — Paul commands two briefs to be prepared. — Report of a third audience of the Pope. — Paul's declaration of his unlimited authority. — The briefs are despatched . . . . . . . . ..175 CHAPTER V. The arguments put forward by the Republic did not deserve to pre- vail. — And why] — Sarpi consulted by the Republic. — Protestant views at that day. — The Senate decides on sending an extraordi- CONTENTS, xiii PAGE nary ambassador to Rome. — Nuncio is informed of it. — The policy of France. — Cardinals murmur at the sending of the briefs. — The Senate sends letters to the various Courts. — Paul orders the instant presentation of the briefs. — Means adopted by the Pope for keeping the departure of a courier from the know- ledge of the Venetian ambassador.^ — Remarkable scene in the ducal palace. — The Nuncio presents the briefs. —The death of Giimani ........... 187 CHAPTER YI. Election of the new Doge, Leonardo Donato. — The opening of the briefs. — The brief respecting the laws on the alienation of pro- perty to ecclesiastics. — The Senate consults authorities. — Applies to Fra Paolo. —His wi-itten answer. — He is appointed theologian to the Republic— Copies of the Pope's brief sent to foreign courts. — The Senate's rej.ly to the brief. — Interview between the am- bassador and the Pope ou presenting the reply .... 199 CHAPTER VII. The Nuncio before the College on the lOth of February. — The Doge and the blessed Candle. — Feeling at the foreign Courts. — France. — Spain. — Presentation of the second brief. — Reply of the Senate. — Duodo the ambassador extraordinary, and the Pope, on the 25th of March. —The French ambassador before the College. — Opinions of the Cardinals.— The Venetians seek to make delays. — The English ambassador, Wotton, and Secretary Scaramelli. — Intercepted letter of the General of the Jesuits. — Intercession of the Cardinals of Verona and Vicenza. — The Interdict drawn up and printed. — Paul wavers at the last moment. — Scene in the Consistory. — The Interdict is published 215 BOOK IV'. FDLiMEN STOPPED AT THE FRONTIER. CHAPTER I. Immediate results of the Interdict. — Rome's weapons are still the same. — Theory of Kxcoinniunication. — Text from St. Matthew. — Interdict, its oriijinal use and theory. — Struggles of the civil power against it.— No appeal to fundamental principles attempted. xiv CONTENTS. PACE Treatise of Chancellor Gerson. — Summary of liis positions. — Bcl- larmiiie's polemic. — Sarpi's defence of Gerson. — Tlie rules of the scholastic game aclniitted as .supreme authority on all sides. — Eesults to Roman Catholic intellect. — Labours of the casuists. — Sarpi fights his fight as a good Catholic ..... 233 CHArXER II. What was to be said, and what was to be done about the Interdict. — No real faith in the effect of Excommunication, except among the uneducated masses. — Esoteric and exoteric doctrines. — Danger to society from the distinction. — Real meaning and intent of the Interdict. — Means of resistance adapted to this intent. — How about Sarpi's orthodoxy ? — Position of the Venetian priests. — Anecdote of the measures adopted towards one of them. — Results of State and Church connection. — The Friar's orthodoxy again. — The material measures adopted by the Senate more interesting to us, than the theological arguments of its advocates . . . 251 CHAPTER III. ileasures tal^en by Venice. — Divided into four categories. — Means adopted for preventing the Pope's brief from entering Venice. — The Duge to the Nuncio. — Formal protest against the Interdict. — The foreign ambassadors. — France. — Spain. — Germany. — The smaller States. — The English ambassador. — Venice arms. — Penal measures adopted against disobedient priests. — Nonconforming priests acted rightly. — Steps taken against various priests. — The Capuchins and 'i'heatines. — Bishop's relatives threatened. — The Jesuits quit Venice. ......... 204 CHAPTER IV. The Nuncio at Venice on Ascension-day. — Another Nuncio on the same day at Piague. — The Nuncio quits Venice. — The Venetian ambassador quiti^ Rome. — Interview between the Venetian ambas- sador and King James in London.— Engli.sh ideas of a new Council. — Strange occurrence at Vicenza. — Attempts of the Pope to stir up disturliances in the Venetian States. — Measures of the Senate for rateting these. — Military position of the two parties. — Policy of France. ^Of England — A second interview between James and the Venetian ambassador. — Sir Henry Wotton before the College. — Henry IV. 's remarks on King James's offers to CONTENTS. XV PAGE Venice. — The Pope shows signs of willingness to come to terms. — All hope of this destroyed for the time being by the Spanish King's letter to the Pope 282 CHAPTER V. The Pope deceived in his hopes of assistance from Spain. — His present position. — Much damajre had been inflicted on the Church. — The literature of the Interdict. — The censorship at Venice. — Character and .scope of the writings on the side of the Church. — Bellarmine. — Various proposals for arranging the differences. — How was the Interdict to be taken off? — Spanish and French politics. — Di Castro sent by Spain to Venice. — His mission fails. — Jealousies between the French and Spanish ambassadors. — Cardinal Joyeuse sent to Venice 298 BOOK V. PEACE WHERE THERE WAS NO PEACE. CHAPTER I. Cardinal de Joyeuse sent as ambassador extraordinary to Italy. — DiflBculties encountered by him. — Di Castro, the Spanish ambas- sador extraordinary. — De Joj'euse at the College. — The " word," which the Venetians were urged to speak. — Di Castro at the College. —Spanish hiatillty. — Conditions proposed by the Senate. — French finesse and diplomatic tact.— Final reply of the Senate to De Joyeuse, and to Di Castro.— De Joyeuse starts for Home. — The Turkish view of the quarrel.— The Spanish ambassadors detected falsehoods. — Negotiations of De Joyeuse at Rome. — His return from Home . . . . ■ • • • .311 CHAPTER II. The Cardinal reports his successes. — The Jesuit difficulty. — Other differences —The reply of the Senate.— Account of the interview l)etwecn the Cardinal and the deputed S.jimlorH. — Venice docs not wish for a Papal benediction — Who shall 8p<'ak first, Doge or Pope? -The Cardinal loves truth, but loves Vu\n: Paul better. — Shall we say two ambassadors? — Venice won't bale an inch. — xvi CONTENTS. PAGF The Pope, therefore, has to do so. — The form of the document re- calling the Ducal Protest. — Tweedkdum and Tweudledee. — Con- ditions of reconciliation are completed 326 CHAPTER III. The day of reconciliation. — The giving up of the ecclesiastical prisoners. — No rejoicings in Venice. — The removal of the Censures. — The Cardinal celebrates mass. — Venice won't listen to him-.-An am- bassador to Rome elected. — Presents voted to De Joyeuse and Di Castro. — Fresh complaints of the Pope. — Unsuccessful efforts of the Cardinal. — "Stato" and "restato." — The new ambas- sador's entry into Eome, and audience of the Pope. — Damage received by Kome in the contest. — Her enmity against Sarpi. . 340 CHAPTER IV. The litigation of Rome v. Venice is decided ; — but that of Rome v. Sarpi i-emains. — Anathema is tried, and fails. — Prospects of Pro- testantism in Italy. — Cajolery is tned against the Friar, and faUs. — Cardinal de Joyeuse again. — The new Nuncio, Berlinghiero Gessi. — Rome, finding both curses and cajolery useless against the Friar, has recourse to other means. — Letter from Trajan Boccalini to Sarpi. — Warning from Gaspar Schioppius. — Sarpi's reply to these warnings. — Warnings from the Venetian ambas- sador at Rome. — Rutilio Orlandini. — Attempted assassination of Sarpi in the streets of Venice. 353 CHAPTER V. Who were the assassins? — The escape of most of the gang. — The story of the matter current at the time. — Antecedents of Poma. — Commotion caused by the assassination in Venice. — Measures of the Government. — Proclamation for the arrest of the assassins. — Measures taken for Sarpi's future safety. — Rome offended by the terms of the proclamation by the Senate. — Subsequent life and adventures of Poma. — Steps taken by Rome to avert the suspicions of Europe. — Disputes at Rome. — General feeling there. — Death of Poma. — Other conspiracies against the life of Sarpi. — His remaining years, and death. — Death of Paul V. — Conclusion 366 NOTES 398 INDEX 335 BOOK I. THE TIME. CHAPTEK I. — ♦ — INTRODUCTORY. The two men were born in the same year, one in Rome, and the other in Venice. It was in 1552. The first was Camillo Borghese, the son of a law3'er of Siena, who had abandoned his native city to avoid the despotism of Cosmo de Medici, when that tyrant by violence and treachery succeeded in making himself master of that previously independent republic. The Siennese citizen prospered in Eome ; became Dean of the Consistorial bar there ; and father of the future I'aul v., by Flaminia degli Astalli, a noble Roman ludy. The second of the two was Pietro Sarpi, the son of a Venetian trader, who is recorded by that son's biogra- l)hers to have been an active, energetic, restless, wiry, sharp-eyed little man, turl)ulent, quarrelsome, and im- practicable witliiil ; qualities which seem to have so far neutralised liis better gifts, as to have rendered the poor man's life-struggle a consistently unsuccess- ful one, and to liave contributed to hustle him out of it while his son was yet an infant. The wife of this broken-down trader, the widowed mother of the iul'aut citizen of Venice was, we are told — and the information may not be without interest to speculative physiologists — singularly contrasted with her husband in appear- 4 INTRODUCTION. unce and temperament. Lisabetta Morelli belonged to a family of free Venetian citizens, a distinction felt in Venice by those ^Yho possessed it, as well as by those who liad it not, to be equivalent to a sort of nobility ; thougli, as in the case of the widow Sarpi, it was compatible with a very humble social position. Lisabetta Avas one of those tall, finely-formed blondes, whom Titian loved to paint, with pearls among the abundant tresses of their golden hair, and whom his pictures have taught us to associate with surroundings of Venetian scenery, and passages of Venetian story ; not inappropriately, for it is a type frequently to be met with among the native population of the sea-born city, and its neighbour islands ; and is indicative of purity of descent from a more northern race, unmodi- fied by that mixture with the indigenous Italian stock, which was more inevitable in the cities of the main land. A mild, gentle-hearted, loving woman, with strong religious feelings and tendencies, we are told, the widow Sarpi was ; and it is added, that her son resembled her in feature and temperament. And the two boys, the wealthy and highly placed young Roman, and the poor and humbly born young Venetian, grew up during that third quarter of the sixteenth century, the one in Home and the other in Venice, among the different influences that were pre- paring them for the parts they were respectively to play in the woi'ld ; and no human sagacity or foresight could have availed to foretell, that either should be aught more to the other than any other undistinguished unit of the then rising generation. But the Roman boy rose to be made, by the play of priestly passions and the intriguing of rival kings. Pope Paul V. ; while the Venetian grew to become by vii'tue of his own " IL TERRIBILE FIIATE. 5 gifts of head and heart, the Servite Friar Paul, " the Venetian," as in after Hfe he was with such good reason wont to sign himself. Pope Paul was a pope such as in some degree his own idiosyncrasy, hut in a greater degree the circumstances of his age made him ; and he belonged both by what was good and by what was evil in him to a class of popes, of whom Rome produced about that time several examples. But " Frii Paolo Yeneto " — Friar Paul, the Venetian — was such a friar as the world has not seen before nor since. " II terribile frate," as the historians of his country are fond of calling him, — the terrible friar was terrible indeed to his adversaries in that great fight, which has rendered his name world-famous. No good work, it has been well said, ever dies. By virtue of its ever expanding series of consequences it is immortal. But it is the fortune of some among the benefactors of mankind, that the very circumstance of the incompleteness of the victory won by them in their struggle against evil, serves to keep the living and still active force of what they did achieve more I)erpetually before the eyes of succeeding generations. Where tbe fight has still to be carried on, the champion is still needed. And of few of tlie great warriors in the eternal cause of truth, wlio have fought the good tight and gone to their rest, can tJjis be predicated with such striking correctness, as of Paul the Friar of N'enice. Of few can it be said so justly, not only that being dead they yet speak, l^iit that their speaking is still that, of which the world has at its present hour special need. It is nearly two centuries and a half since Sarpi died, and despite his indefatigable energy, his immense industry, liis unshakeuble courage, his vast learning. 6 INTRODUCTION. and his ardent patriotism, left his work incomplete. The emancipation of civil society from priestl}' thral- dom was the work for which he lived. And no one man has ever accomplished so much towards that all- important aim. Bnt the task was too arduous for one individual and one life-time to accomplish. "I must go to St. Mark's," he muttered, when dying, in the delirium which preceded his dissolution then close at hand ; " it is already late, and I have much to do ! " Yes ! there was still much needed to be done by that poor brain yet so busy with its wonted thoughts. But the night was at hand, when no man could work more ; and the task was left undone. But if the final winning of the battle was not for him to see, if the gathering of the harvest was for other hands and other days, it is to him we owe the sowing of the seed, which has in due time produced the crop, even now ready for the sickle. But if the gratitude of all succeeding generations, and especially of the jiresent, has been, and is, due, in a greater measure, perhaps, than has been generally recognised, to Father Paul, to a still greater degree have the historians of the various European nations failed to mete out a fair measure of recognition to the sagacious, intrepid, and patriotic government, which employed, protected, and backed him, and which, at a time when greater nations from corrupt motives would not, and weaker communities dared not, oj^pose the encroachments of Church power on the secular affairs of mankind, stood forth the champion of civil liberty and the supremacy of civil law. It was under the strong shield of the Venetian republic that the terrible Friar braved the power which, but for such protection, MISCONCEPTIONS EESPECTING VENICE. 7 would have crushed him in an instant. It was at the biddincj and for the laws of Venice that he fought as a Venetian citizen, preferring loyalty to his humanity to loyalty to his tonsure. The position assumed by the government of Venice in the great and all-important struggle which is to be the subject of the following pages, was truly such as to merit the admiration and gratitude of mankind. But in this, as in various other respects, the peculiar and remarkable government which ruled Venice and its territory for more than eight hundred years, has been but superficially studied and very erroneously appreciated by the writers of popular history. The French historian Daru, whose work is one of pre- tension, and has incautiously been widely received as one of authority, has contributed much to this false and unjust estimate by its errors in fact and unfairness in representation. But a few picturesque lines by an universally-read poet have done, perhaps, even more to root in tlie contemporary popular mind a very mis- taken notion of a government which, though it was by no means free from the errors in practice and theory that belonged to its age, was for a period of many centuries decidedly in advance of any other European community, both in its conception of the functions of government and its modes of carrying out its views. A graphic poet-spoken word or two of description of the prisons of the republic, — a romantic story or two of the secret action and irresistible power of " the Ten," — liavc sufiiccd to enable the flash of genius to photograpli on the public mind the well-known picture of a mysterious, remorseless, and tyrannic power, which serves " the general reader" for an idea of llmt skilfully-constructed and well-poised system of govern- 8 INTRODUCTION. meut, to wliich mankind has on many occasions owed so much. In viiin the matter-of-fact traveller, rule and note-book in hand, visits the prisons, which have securely established themselves in all the romantic imaginations of Europe, and proves that any jury of upholsterers would pronounce them far more comfort- ably habitable than many of our own. In vain it is suggested to the romance-of- history-loving mind that the Bridge of Sighs conveys by its poetically lugu- brious name no such serious imputation on the authorities, to which it belonged, as, for instance, the phrase " Black Monday " casts on the adminis- trations which made Monday perennially " black " at the Old Bailey. The prose-man and humble dealer in fact finds it — not in this matter alone — a very up-hill and well nigh hopeless task to undo that which the poet and the romancer have but too thoroughly done. The real history of Venice has yet to be written. Abundant materials for it are now available which could hardly be said to be available a few years ago. It is a story second to none that mankind has ever acted in all that makes history valuable and delightful. We have much writing on the subject ; but we have not yet the history of Venice, in any language. Meanwhile it is the more modest scope of this volume to tell the true story of one episode in that history, especially deserving of the study and admira- tion of all ages ; but, above all, worthy of attention at the present day. CHAPTER II. Positioa of the Church and State question in the latter half of the 16th century. — Restoration of the Church of Rome. — Real value of that restoration. — Hostility between the Church and the World. — Causes of this. — Inevitable effects of Protestantism. — Its working in England. — Awakening of despotic mouarchs to the real tendencies of Protestantism. — Consequent alliance between them and Rome. — Grounds of quarrel between spiritual and lay despotism. — Rome's claims higher than ever after the Council. — Rome preaches anti-monarchical doctrines. — Opinion of Ranke on the possibilities at that time open to the Catholic Church. — This opinion controverted. — The Council of Trent. — Its right to the title of "(Ecumenical." — Net results of it very different from what was anticipated.— Real motives of its decisions. — Justification by Faith and by Works. — Rome's meaning of the term "Works." — The claims of Rome to universal supremacy are logical. — The only alternative left to mankind is entire submission or denial of her first principles. — But despotic rulers can adopt neither of these alternatives. It will be the object of the second book of my story to give the reader as complete a conception as I am able of the two men who were the principal champions in the memorable quarrel that has been spoken of in the last chapter. But, before attempting this, it will be well to describe, as shortly as possible, the position in whicli matters ecclesiastical stood in the world at tlic time when Paul the Pope and Paul the Friar were called on to take })art in them. Matters ecclesiastical occupied at that time a very large portion of the thoughts, aims, and strivings of nations and their rulers. Tons of tomes have been written in record and elucidation of the controversies and arguments of the thinkers, the motives and actions 10 THE TIME. of the doers, in the great struggle to get these matters adjusted in some not totally intolerable way, which then mainly occupied mankind. The attempt, there- fore, to set forth any intelligible account of so large a subject in a few short pages, may perhaps reasonably appear presumptuous, if not absurd. It n^ny, how- ever, be not impossible to accomplish this, if we will limit ourselves to a statement of the . real gist and object of the disputes which were agitating Europe, and content ourselves with the true meaning and aims of the disputants, to the exclusion of all their repre- sentations of their meaning and aims, and of all their indirect and not wholly sincere manoeuvrings, schemings, and strategetic movements. The plain truth of any matter can always be told in very much fewer words than are used about it by those who have reasons for not setting forth the full and naked truth respecting it. And this will be found to be so in a very especial degi'ee in the case of matters eccle- siastical, where very simple, very intelligible, and quite mundane objects were contended for on grounds involving purely theological considerations. Take, for example, the Council of Trent, the greatest event of the times in question. It lasted eighteen years ; and never, probably, in the annals of mankind has there been enacted a drama demanding so large an erudition, so subtle a power of analysis, and so patient a development of exposition in the historian who would satisfactorily relate all the details of its pro- gress, elucidate all the motives and policy of the numerous personages who took part in it or influenced its decisions ; paint in their proper colours the diverse passions and aims which, checking, clashing, and thwarting each other, contributed to the general COUNCIL OF TKENT. 11 result ; and draw out the clear sti*eam of an intelli- gible narrative from the mass of documents, immense and yet imperfect, in which all this is to be found. The difficulty and extent of the subject is so great, that the labours of the historians who have treated of it have still left a sufficiently arduous task to such readers of their works as would attain to a full com- prehension of the story. Eanke * speaks much of the almost insuperable difficulty of attaining to an accu- rate and satisfactory knowledge of the history of the Council ; and if such an investigator has found the task all but impossible, any other may be tempted to give up the enterprise in despair. Yet the leading and simple truths connected with this great event, the real reasons which brought it about, the true motives of those who controlled its determinations, and the broad and certain consequences to which it led, may be easily comprehended and compendiously stated. The history of Europe during the generation which succeeded to that of the Tridentine Fathers is also one of considerable complexity, though far more easily to bo mastered than that of the Council itself. The adjustment of tbo interests of the civil and eccle- siastical autlioritics in the diflerent countries of Kurope h'd to a great variety of events, political systems, alliances, and quarrels. But the master-key to tlie right understanding of all this history is to be found in the necessary antagonism of secular and clerical interests ; and the nature of this necessary antagonism, the position of the two, or rather three, parties in the strife (for the people had interests altogether ditl'erent from those of either Church or * See Appendix, No. 21, Hist, of the PopCB of 16tb aud 17tli ccnturieH. 12 THE TIME. monarch), and the real objects of each of them, are also capable of being shortly and clearly set forth. Such brief and compendious statements, however, it must be understood, make no pretence to be history : they are merely tlie generalised, net results of the history as digested by the writer's mind ; they furnish the reader with no means of testing the correctness of the writer's conclusions ; and different minds digest their historical studies to very different net results, and to the formation of very different opinions. Yet such unsupported statements of the true essence of the history, as it appears to the present writer, are all that can be attempted here ; and readers disposed to differ with him in his reading of the fiicts, can only be referred for the formation of their owai judgments to the great sources of our knowledge of the period. The great revolt against Rome which resulted in liberating a portion of Europe from her 3'oke, did not liave the effect of weakening her hold on the part which still remained to her. On the contrary, the sacerdotal despotism, which weighed on the greatest part of Europe and rendered all progress impossible, appeared to consolidate and estabUsh itself. The nations had made their struggle, their efforts had proved ineffectual, and they seemed to have sunk back exhausted into acquiescence under the tyranny, from which they had failed to emancipate themselves. The great life-and-death battle, which in the earlier part of the sixteenth century the Church had waged for its existence, had been fought out and decided, while Paul the Pope, fifth of that name, and Paul the Friar were growing up to man's estate. " Heresy" had been extirpated in Italy, and was about to be so in other countries, which it had, with CATHOLIC EESTORATION. 13 fair prospect of success at one time, disputed with Rome. This consoHdation of Churcli power over those nations which had not succeeded in throwing off its thraldom, has generally been called the great restoration of Catholicism. And Protestant writers, as well as such Catholics as have been sufficiently un- Catholic to admit the possibilit}'- that the infallible Church could need amending, have pointed out the marked amelioration and reform which it underwent in the course of, and as a necessary consequence of, the struggle. The change, which took place at that time in Rome's politics, habits of thought, and ways of life, was indeed far too notable to escape the observation of the most superficial reader of Papal history. But if the new course, on which the Church of Rome was then entering, and which it has since pur- sued be studied by one, who will bear in mind the while the true meaning of a " Church," its proper significance and duty, and the conditions on which alone it can hope to discharge the functions it pro- fesses to undertake, he will perhaps come to the conclusion, that the Catholic " restoration"* or reform during the latter half of the sixteenth century, far from being any real restoration or return to the true position and duties of a Church, was a movement which If.'d that of Rome farther away than ever from all possibility of assuming such a position or jierforming such duties. Amelioration of u certain very visible sort there was unquestionably. The Popes became " respectable," and Rome " decent." No more monsters of well-nigh incredible profligacy were seen on the Papal throne. No more high-handed despots • The iihraae is e8i>ccially Rankc'a. Sec Book vi. of tlic llistory of the Popes. 14 THE TIME. capable of shaking Europe with a trembling fit by thunders launched " Urbi et Orbi" from the Lateran ! The occupants of Peter's seat took more to blessing and less to cursing. " Servus servorum" no longer appeared in the character of a warrior-chief more con- versant with battle-fields than breviaries. The halls of the Vatican no more echoed the merriment of Papal banquets over jests and conversation fitted rather to the table of a Mecaenas or a Lucullus, than to tliat of Heaven's vicegerent upon earth. We find no more bishojis openly advising each other to avoid reading the trash of St. Paul, for fear of spoiling the purity of their Ciceronian style ; and no more cardinals— at least in public — professing that all Kome needed, to make a residence there delightful, was a court full of ladies ! Nothing of all this after the Council of Trent ! Rome abjured sack, and took to living cleanl3\ Thenceforward at least its priests were priestly. Very many of them had priestly attainments in large abundance. Some of them had priestly virtues. But all had priestly vices. Thenceforward the preservation, protection, and security of the sacerdotal caste, its power, its pelf, and its privileges, were the true objects for which the Church existed. No longer seeking to manage and rule the w'orld, except by underhand means, and for secondary aims, it turned all its efforts " to the greater glory of God." And this was perfectly understood by every tonsured head, from that which wore the tiara to that of the miserablest barefoot Cordelier, who worked for the good cause at the lowest base of the social pyramid, to mean exclusively the greater power, wealth, and dignit}- of the sacerdotal caste. The great object of the Church's life thenceforward was to live. PROTESTANT PRINCIPLES. 15 Bad as the Mediaeval Church had been, and grossly worldly as had been its rude efibrts to manage and govern the rude world around it, still it was in those ages a portion of the human famil}- ; it was the peoj)le's Church ; was often the people's friend, ally, teacher, and consoler ; and during more than one long period had contributed to advance rather than impede the onward march of mankind. Not till the epoch in question did it become clear, that the interests of the Church and the truest interests of humanit}^ were at variance. Not till then was it clearly understood that lay and clerical was to be thenceforth a relationship in- volving hostility. But such has been in reality the state of things between the Church and the world ever since Rome succeeded, after the close of the gi'eat drawn battle between her and the Reformation, in establishing that restoration of her authority over the provinces remain- ing to her which has been spoken of above. The causes of this new and definite relationship between the Church and mankind, — between the Shep- herd and the sheep — are not far to seek, nor difficult to be understood. It has been well remarked, that the great leaders of the Reformation, who succeeded in stripping Rome of so much of her territory, and who, when she escaped from them with the rest safe, as she hoped, left the arrow in her wound, which will at last prove finally fatal to her, were very far from being fully aware of the whole force and significancy of the change they hud effected, and of the consequences wliich were necessarily to result from it. ANliile earn- estly engaged in asserting and maintaining certain theological doctrines, they did jiot ])erceive tliat the j)rinciples invoked by them in support of tlicse were equally applicable to the overturning of lay despotism. 16 THE TIME. But it was very soon discovered, and that by despotic rulers and their counsellors quite as quickly as by their subjects, that "Protestantism" meant civil no less than spiritual liberty. No monarch, who ever wielded sceptre, would have been less disposed to admit the truth of this, than our Henry VIII., or his high- handed, though Protestant, daughter. But the moral causes that were put into action, worked on to their inevitable consequences despite the power of kings and their policy ; and in the next reign, " the British Solomon " began to perceive the fact, — to his ex- treme dismay and unending trouble. But in England the great conquest was achieved. And Englishmen held fast to their Protestantism with an unanimity of determination and tenacity, which zeal for mere doctrinal truths, however sincere, would not have sufficed to inspire and sustain. " No Bishop, no King ! " said the British Solomon, with all the sagacity inspired by the unerring instinct of self-preservation. And he kept his bishops. For Englishmen, in accordance with their wonted habit of taking a century or two to bring about a revolution quietly and safely, instead of convulsing the body social, and risking the loss of all the progress made, by endeavouring to effect their revolutions at a stroke, like some other nations — the Englishmen of the age of James, contented themselves with securing beyond the reach of all danger those fundamental principles, which have ever since been killing Church autliority by inches, and in the mean time troubled themselves little about the illogical inconsistencies in their social system, which had to result in praemunire statutes, and diocesan chapters reluctantly electing doubtfully orthodox bishops at the bidding of heterodox ministers. But even the illogical CHURCH OF ENGLAND. 17 half-and-half protestantism adopted by our own Befor- mation, with a view of rendering possible its com- bination with high right-divine doctrines of civil government, has by its indefeasible progressive virtue placed English liberties whei-e they are. And it has at the same time by the inconsistencies and incoheren- cies involved in its incompleteness, dragged our Church from its untenable position into the maze of contra- dictions, falsehoods, difficulties, and absurdities, which crop out in schisms between liturgy and articles ; in bishops elected by mixed action of divine inspiration and conge d'elire ; in clergy, punishable at common law for denying their sacramental or other functions according to the strict requirement of the canon they are bound to obey ; in parish priests hooted from their churches, because they refuse to conform to the popular taste and feeling in matters, with which the popular taste and feeling have, according to the theory and constitution of their Church, not the slightest right to interfere ; and in every variety of social dead-lock, in which, from the inherent falseness of the position, tliose of tlie conteiuling parties wlio have most of common-sense and reason on tlicir side are most wrong legally; and those whose legal position is most unattacka]>ly correct, arc; in most glaring opposition to reason and common-sense. All this Protestantism, bursting tlio old bottles into wliich it was poured, lias inevitably brought about, even when admitted in the maimed and imperfect ccmdition, in wJiich Knghind first received if. The des])()tic sovereigns of continental nations would risk no alliance with a princijde so surely i)regnant with the germs of freedom. " I'uris is well worth a mass !" cried frank, light-minded Henry IV. And though it was not the IS THE TIME. way with saturnine self-contained Charles V. to talk in such off-hand and imprudent fashion, it may be easily understood, that his insistance for the holding of a council (from which he anticipated a very different result from that which fell out) ; his "Interim" code of provisional faith and religion, and his reverence for a pontiff, whom at need he imprisoned in his own fortress, and whose city he sacked ; were prompted by a similar deeply rooted persuasion. Protestantism, then, was clearly the common enemy of both civil and spiritual despotism ; and the natural result of the discovery was alliance between both those enemies of mankind. The friendship growing out of these motives, and working to this end, was of course pernicious and debasing to both the parties concerned. But the demoralising and degrading effects of it were necessarily more fatally felt by the Church. To assume the position thus made for it, the Church had more visibly, notoriously, and scandalously to abandon all its proper business and functions as a Church. Lay princes spotted their ermine all over with stains of falsehood and untrue pretence. But the apostolical successor of St. Peter became in all his essence a living lie, and the grossest of sham priests, as the inevitable consequence of consenting to this " ca' me, ca' thee " bargain with despots. No pages in the history of mankind are fouler or more revolting to the moral sense than those which record the prostitution of Church influences, under the pressure of this unhal- lowed bargain, to purposes of secular police, and the maintenance of what absolute rulers term " order." And nothing save the deplorable familiarity of the spectacle, which has at length so depraved tlie moral sense of the masses of mankind as to lead them to CHUECH AND STATE. 19 consider the arrangement as a matter of course, could have induced so many generations to tolerate the monstrous hypocrisy in either party to this Churcli- and -State-mutual-support-association. Nothing else could have blinded them to the truly incalculable injury done to mankind by that conversion of religion from a life-elixir into a poison, which necessarily results from thus officialising it, and allying it with the natural enemy of all men's best secular hopes and interests. This was the position into which the Church fell, after its fight for life with the principles of the Kefor- mation ; when monarchs had become aware that those principles were likely to prove as dangerous to them as to Home. And it is the utter incapacity for any good purpose, and the activity for fatally evil purposes alone, of a Church occupying such a position, which justifies the assertion that Rome in her latter days of comparative decency and respectability has been farther from all possibility of discharging the duties and functions of a Church than she was even in the pre- vious ages of a hierarchy more grossly and scandalously unclerical. The learned historian I have already quoted thinks * that the observation which commonly " ascribes to the principle of the Catholic religion a peculiar connexion, a natural sympathy with the monarchical or aristo- cratical forms of government," is unlonndid, inasmucli as the real fact is, that "Catholicism always attached itself to the side on which it found its firmest prop and most powerful ally ; " and that " this religious system has no inherent or necessary affinity to one form of government more than to another." It is true uu- * Ranke, lliat. of the Popes, Auatiu's translation, vol. ii. p. 135. 02 20 THE TIME. qucstionaljly, as tlie writer lias shown by sundry instances, that the Church lias always attached itself to whatever appeared to promise it the firmest prop and most available support. It is true that the Popes have ever been ready to play fast and loose with their monarchical allies, to avail themselves of popular passions whenever their own sails could be set so as to be filled by the breath of them, and to play off, as occa- sion offered, democratic resistance against sovereigns disposed to be recalcitrant against Church authority. But I do not think that all this is at all incompatible with the opinion that the Catholic religion has a pecu- liar connexion and natural sympathy with monarchical and despotic forms of government. Notwithstanding the instances cited by the historian, and others which might be adduced, in which the Church has made use of popular interests and passions for the punishment and coercion of unsubservient monarchs, the great and lasting alliances of the Church have always been with sovereigns, and have been close and intimate in pro- portion to the absoluteness of those sovereigns' dominion. How indeed could it be otherwise ? What alliance or sympathy is possible between liberty in any shape and a power whose first and all-important demand is plenary, unconditional, unquestioning submission and self-abnegation ? Is the complete j)rostration of the soul under the yoke of absolute authority a likely pre- paration for, or accompaniment of, civil liberty ? Where blind submission, utter annihilation of the will to such a point that the obedience rendered to the will of another is that of unreasoning matter, " perinde ac cadaver," as the celebrated Jesuit formula expresses it : — where such submission is deemed the most valu- ALLIANCE OF CATHOLICISil WITH DESPOTISM. 21 able of virtues, is any species of freedom likely to find encouragement or toleration ? Is much liberty likely to be allowed to the body by those who enslave the soul ? Or, if it were, would the liberty so allowed be fruitful or beneficent to the possessor of it ? "Idem velle et idem nolle, id demum firma amicitia est," as the historian * tells us. And despot priest and despot king demand the same thing from humanity, — sub- mission and obedience. But the natural alliance between lay and spiritual despotism failed, as was to have been expected, from the peculiar nature of the Church claims, in rendering the understanding between the two powers an easily adjusted one : nor has the wrangle between them over the rights filched from mankind ever ceased to the present hour. In the years immediately" succeeding the closing of the Council, the quarrel was especially active, as was to have been expected. The reinvigo- rated Church pitched the note of its claims in the liighest key. Civil rulers were more awake than they had been in less thinking times to the ultimate results of the demands made upon them by the spiritual power ; yet, at the same time, an increasingly clear comprehension of tlie inevitably liberalising tendencies of Protestantism Avarned tliem of the expediency of not breaking with Home entirely. Tiiere were other speciiil circumstances in the situation of Europe which led to the assumption of an unusually liigh tone on the part of the Popes at tlie close of the sixteenth and opening of the seventeentli centuries. The starting in Englmnl of an anomalous system of lay Popeship, produced (English fashion) by ♦ Sallust. Catiline. 22 THE TIME. the working of practical expediency in utter contempt of logical consistency, urged Romish casuists to the adoption, on paper, of anti-monarchical principles. Those audaciously absurd islanders (for such they must have appeared to logical Rome) insisted on having a monarch by right divine, while refusing all allegiance to tlie only power which could impart such a right to royalty. They invented for themselves an apostolic Church, which utterly refused all submission to the sole authority whose claims to infallibility must indis- putably be the best, supposing infallibility to be extant on earth : and yet, if it did not absolutely claim for itself infallibility in theory, acted towards its laity in a manner which nothing short of the possession of it could justify or render decently consistent. A theory so outrageous, or rather a practice so in defiance of all theory, irritated Rome into a strange and most un- natural temporary alliance with the most advanced democratic doctrines. And the most high-church Catholic doctors wrote and preached that the civil power had no claim to exist by right divine in any case ; that the sovereign derived his power solely from the will of the people, avIio possessed an indefeasible right to place as monarch over them any ruler, save one who should he ohjectionaUe to the only potver really existing hy right divine — the Holy See ! Then again in France, the necessity v/hich the Church had been under of removing a rebellious monarch in the person of Henry III., and the acces- sion of an heretical one in the person of Henry IV., were further motives for the propagation of doctrines so " dangerous " and subversive. And the then modern militia of the Church, the comparatively recent Order of Jesus, supplied exactly the kind of men OPINIOX OF EANKE. 23 fitted for the management of such perilous weapons. In Spain, Philip III., a monarch after Rome's own heart, was content to tolerate her assumption of a position so fatal to the authority and independence of princes, by the aid it lent him for the nonce in his intrigues with the French high-catholic leaguers against Henry IV. " Had the Popes succeeded at this moment," saj'S Ranke,* " they would have achieved for ever the i^re- dominancy of the Church over the State. They put forward claims, and their adherents enounced opinions and principles, which threatened kingdoms and states both with internal convulsions and with the loss of independence." The claims and doctrines of Rome did unquestionably threaten all this and more besides. But it is dithcult for an Englishman to agree with the historian in thinking, that the success of tlie Popes in their attempt at that crisis would have achieved "/or ever," or even for a long period, the predominancy of the Cliurcli over the State. The principles main- tained contained in them a germ equally fatal to spiritual as to temporal despotism. They are in flagrant opposition to the eternal principles on which the human soul has been created. And nature cannot bo "put down." However violent and vigorous the " furca " of despotic power, " tamcn usque recurrat." The world has seen no example of a people in the enjoyment of civil liberty effectually priest ridden. Even in Ireland, which might seem to furnish the nearest approach to a specimen of such a phenomenon, the influence of Rome can only manifest itself by an increasingly hopeless struggle to combat the intel- ligence by the ignorance of the country. • Op. cit., vol. ii. IP. 187. 21. THE TIME. INIay it not rather be argued, that, had the Popes at that crisis succeeded in establishing their claims to so-called spiritual supremac}^ at the cost of establish- ing also tlie indefeasible right of nations to the choice of their rulers, and the derivation of all sovereign power from the popular will, the result would have been a very much more rapid arrival at emancipation from spiritual as well as civil despotism? Nor were the Popes themselves, and the wiser of their counsellors, blind to this danger, or willing to risk a definitive breach with civil rulers, when it was possible to avoid it ; notwithstanding the thorough-going violence of those theologians who were tempted by the jjosition and cliaracter of the Spanish king, or by a genuine belief in the excellence and divine appointment of a theocracy, to strike for unlimited supremacy over mankind. It was nothing less than this that Home deliberately attempted at the Council of Trent. That fateful assembly brought its sittings to a con- clusion in 1503 — eighteen years after its first meeting in 15-15. It was the last of the great series of " oecumenical " councils, or general parliaments of the universal Church, for the decision and settlement of the articles of a Christian man's faith. No council was ever held that, with any degree of accuracy, was entitled to assume the lofty designation, and put for- ward the mighty pretensions thus set forth. Less and less as the ages went by, did the reality of the councils correspond with their professions ; and least of all could the Council of Trent lay claim either to its name or to any capability of performing the task for which it professed to have been called together. The earhest councils could be termed " oecumenical " only COUNCIL OF TEEXT. 25 by ignoring the existence of that portion of the human race which had not embraced Christianity. And the hitest of them coukl pretend to such a character onlj'' by exchidiug from the Catholic idea of the habitable world not only the unchristian nations, but the unor- thodox and protesting parts of Christendom. Nor was the popidar voice at any time sufficiently authori- tative in the appointment and promotion of priests and bishops, to justify an assembly of the latter in con- sidering themselves a representative parliament of the entire Church. At the date of the Council of Trent the sacerdotal portion of the Church, which the council did in some imperfect sort represent, was not only separated by a broad indelible line from the lay element of it, which remained wholly unrepresented, but was to a great degree hostile and antagonistic to it. Again, with regard to the business for which these general meetings professed to be called together, if it may be conceded that the councils held during the first centuries of the Church were in truth for the most part occupied with debates of a purely theological nature, with a view to deciding between opposing doc- trines on tlioir own intrinsic merits, at Trent the cares of the fathers of the Church had become lowered to the more nnindane consideration of the scheme of doctrine, which it was necessary to impose on tiie lait}^ for the purpose of preserving ecclesiastical power and position. Nevertlieless, the Council of Trent was one of the greatest events of that eventful sixteenth century. As the last council for three Innuh-ed years, iiiid in all l)r(jbability the last the world will ever see, it fixed and (hfined the doctrines and pretensions of the Church irrevocably ; it petrified into immutable rigidity mucli 2G THE TIME. tliat for want of definition had previously been plastic and uncertain ; it was to the Church the burning of lier ships, and cutting off of all possible retreat from the positions then assumed. The_ Catholic faith must remain such as it was stamped by tlie indelible impress of that council ; for such is the penalty of the assump- tion of infallibility. The net results of the eighteen years of the council's labours were extremely different from what a very large, and the most enlightened portion of the Church had expected and hoped. Yet to us, who are enabled to take a synoptical view of the circumstances under which it was held, it appears that the issue was precisely such as might have been predicted, and that it could not have fallen out otherwise. The council was called for the healing of the wounds of the Church, for the removal of those abuses which had driven into schism so large a part of Christendom, for conciliation and reformation. It came together for this purpose, and when it separated, it had irrevocably asserted every objectionable point of doctrine, and had rendered all hope of gathering the schismatic communions again into the pale of the Church impossible. And this was the case, and could not have been otherwise, because each one of those decisions, which irrevocably bound the Church to some point of doctrine, destined ultimatel}^ to be fatal to it, was necessary to the prime object, which the assembled fathers had in view. This object was the maintenance of ecclesiastical power ; — the maintenance of it in its entiret3% it must be remembered, not only against the rebellious and self- asserting spirit of human intelligence, but also against the jealousies of civil rulers. The first had already vigorously entered on the path which could lead to no JUSTIFICATION BY WOEKS. 27 other goal tlian the utter renunciation of authoritj' in matters of faith. The second were becoming more and more awake to the. fact, that ecclesiastical pretensions and principles tended not only to encroach on their own authority, but to render them mere puppets in the hands of the Church. All the complicated struggles, and clash of parties and interests, which made up the sum of work transacted by the Tridentine assembly, when traced to the motives which animated them, will be found to turn on these points. Even the disputes apparently most purely theological in their character derived their real importance from their bearing on the means of preserving sacerdotal power. Why, in the great and fiercely debated question of justification was it impossible for the Church to yield an inch to the ardent supporters of the doctrine of justification by faith, important as they were by their numbers, and respectable by tlieir blameless lives and enthusiastic piety ? Tlie orthodox tenet of justification by " works " was indispensably necessary to the Church. Sacer- dotalism could not do without it, because the opposite scheme tended to destroy the necessity, and in a great measure tlie possibilit}', of priestly supervision and regulation of men's lives. The faith of each human soul, the amount and quality of it, its vigour, liveliness, and fruitfulness, must needs remain a secret between eacli man and his Creator; or, taking even the lowest and most perfunctory view of it, must be received by any infiniier into the matter on the simple statement of the individual. But this would by no means answer the purpose of the Komish priesthood. The require- ment of visible and tangible " works " was absolutely- necessary to thcni, and these works, it must be observed, not such as appeared in the general teuoui' 28 THE TIME. of a life, but such as could be counted, tariffed, labelled, imposed at pleasure, or dispensed with by j)riestly authority. What would become of penances, indulgences, rosary-countings, dispensations, butter- towers * and canonries founded out of the proceeds of permits to eat eggs in Lontj if justification by faith Avere to be admitted ? In a similar sort all the decisions which the Church fought for and succeeded in establishing were vitally necessary to her system. Rome could not, and cannot reform herself. Her scheme of doctrine has been too skilfully and logically built up to admit of any bit being knocked out of the edifice, without bringing down the whole. Her premises are monstrous, but her conclu- sions are so logically drawn from them, that no one of them can be abandoned Avithout invalidating a whole string of antecedent and consequent reasoning. And these are the considerations which might have assured any man who could see them, as we are able to see them now, that the Trideutine Council must have come to the issue it did. But it is needful to guard ourselves against allowing our appreciations of the men, who were engaged in asserting and fighting for sacerdotal power, to be too rigorously formed according to our estimate of their aims. At the present point in the progress of man- kind, it is easy for a mind of very ordinary calibre to understand, that such a spiritual despotism as Rome aimed at, and to so wonderful a degree succeeded in establishing, must in accordance with the eternal laws of man's constitution, be unmaintainable for a perma- * Towers so called are still to be seen in more than one continental city ; the fact that they were built with the proceeds of dispensations for eating butter during fast times, being commemorated by the designatioa. CLAIMS OF EOME. 29 nency by any conceivable means, and deadly to the moral nature both of the exerciser and the victim of it, as long as it is maintained. But minds of a high order were unable to perceive this truth at the time in question. Men, great and good in their generation, conscientiously believed that it was best and safest for the human race to be ruled with " flock-like " docility by the pastoral staff of infallible shepherds. The favourite comparison of the Church to the guiding and ruling soul, and of the laity to the gross bod}-, whose destiny and duty it is to be governed by it, — a meta- phor which recurs again and again in the polemical wi'itings of the seventeenth century, — was urged in all good faith by men fully persuaded of the aj)positeness and stringency of the parallel. Pretensions to uni- versal and absolute sovereignty by the sacerdotal caste, over all lay men and things, were put forward with a perfectly honest persuasion of the divine authority for the claim, and an entire self-confidence in the capa- bility of undertaking it to the advantage of mankind. In this persuasion and in these claims Rome was, as ever, logical. Admit her fundamental positions, and her claim to rule the world must also be admitted as well-founded. Her pretensions accordingly have never varied. Her claim to universal sovereignty may have been allowed to fall into abeyance ; it has never been al)and<>ned. But intelligildy enough it was urged with especial openness, dircftnoss, and pertinacity wlien, lifter ft period, during which the Churcli had well nigh lost her power for want of using it, her claims were anew formulised, enunciated, and set forth l)y tlic decision of the great council, winch, on being ruih'ly wakened from her slumbers, slie had called to ascertain her rights and position. Never did liomc put forward 30 THE TIME. higher chums, nnd assert them more directly and dis- tinctly, than during the generations which immediately followed the closing of the Council of Trent. Her acts indeed had been more high-handed and violent in the rude old times, when unquestioning nations and mo- narchs could be terrified into submission by awful denunciations, and threats backed up from time to time by some well-timed miracle, or unmistakeable manifestation of the divine wrath. But not even in the days of a Gregory VII., or an Innocent III., had sacerdotalism ever theorised so audaciously, or argu- mentatively asserted pretensions so entirely subversive of every shade of civil liberty, as it did, when basing its claims on the doctrines newly and definitively esta- blished by the last oecumenical council. But in the assertion of such claims Home was, as it has been remarked, as ever strictly logical. The claims are monstrous, but they can only be shown to be so, by altogether denying her first principles. Admit these, and all she contends for must be ad- mitted also. And it is very desirable that this should be clearly understood and borne in mind. I in no wise wish to interfere, she said, between the civil ruler and his subjects in matters which do not concern me ; but I must be supreme in all such as do. For the spiritual interests of mankind, it will be ad- mitted, are paramount. Now, I alone, as by admitted hypothesis, have infallible knowledge of what these interests are, and of the manner in which they may be best promoted. None therefore, save myself, can be the judge of the question what matters do, and what do not, concern me. For example, I meddle not with the right of any ruler to levy taxes on his people ; but only claim the privilege of suspending the exercise of ECCLESIASTICAL CLAIMS. 31 that right, in cases where the sovereign would use his resources in a manner calculated to injure me or my friends. Again, I interfere not with the ohedieuce due from the subject to the civil power, except when the latter commands what is directly or indirectly preju- dicial to the cause and interests of religion. In a word, I meddle with human conduct only to enforce the will of God. Do you not admit that tliat will ought to be enforced ? And you have already admitted that I alone know with certain knowledge what that will is. Who can wonder at ecclesiastical " encroachments " under such a system ? Who does not see rather, that there can be no such thing as encroachments ill the prosecution of such claims ? that the entire control of human life must pass into the hands of a power so armed and privileged ? Who does not see the futility of attempting to divide the temporal from the spiritual, and to hedge off a part of human affairs with which religion has nothing to do ? Who does not see that all the wretched cobweb work of technicalities about temporal concerns, and spiritual concerns, and " mixed " concerns (!) are the results of compromise, dislionest on both sides ? Mixed affairs, indeed ! What is the part of human affairs, life, and conduct, which has no relation to the eternal sanctions, and man's duty to God ? Granted the existence of a power on earth, the sole possessor of infallible and eternal trutli, tlie only unerringly insi)ired expositor of G(jd's will, and in a word, his appointed vicegerent, oitfiht not all lule, government, and power over mankind to pass into the hands of that power? Can any one admit the premises and deny the conclusion? Surely, the sole, honest, and logical alternative possible, in reply to the pre- 32 THE TIME. tensions of a power putting forward such claims, is full and unconditional submission, or a distinct denial of the grounds of them. Admit them ; and how humhly to an authority, which it would be no less absurd than wicked to dispute. Or, reply to Rome's pontiff and priests : " We wholly reject and discredit your creden- tials. We deny that you have any knowledge of God, His laws, and will, more or other in kind or quantity than has been vouchsafed by Him to the rest of mankind. We wholly disbelieve in your infallibility on an}' subject whatever, and claim for ourselves an equal power of ascertaining God's will, and conforming our actions to it." But despotic monarchs and their counsellors were for very intelligible reasons unwilling to take either of these courses. History perhaps may furnish an example here and there of a royal fanatic almost disposed to accept tlie former of the above stated alternatives. But fortunately for mankind, such excess of folly has been rare. Far rarer still, any specimen of a ruler taking the otlier course. For the help of the Church in keeping the yoke on men's necks had become too necessary to be dispensed with. This is the simple secret of the bargaining orthodoxy of " INIost Catholic," " Most Christian " monarchs, and " eldest " and other " sons of the Church." Such frank and thorough-going Protestantism as that indicated above, too clearly carried the germs with it of other besides ecclesiastical liberties. Monarchs, therefore, preferred allying themselves with the possessors of a power of infinite force for the subjection of mankind, even though the theory on which tliat power was based necessarily involved claims destructive of their own authority. For that other power, with which they PRIEST AND DESPOT. 33 might have allied themselves, could not be bargained with. Though making at the outset no claims com- parable in audacity and magnitude to those of its rival, it was a living principle, certain to march onwards on the path pointed out by its own inalienable nature, and drag all connected with it in the same direction. With the second principle, despite the logical inevitableness of its claim to entire supremacy, compromise might be made. If monarchs wanted the support of the Church, the Church was in no less need of the assistance of monarchs. Antagonistic pretensions miglit, therefore, admit of arrangement. In the story to be told in the following pages, it will be seen how the instinct of self-preservation, working in lay and priestly despot alike, awoke in the nick of time to avert the dangers to botli that were loominec near, in the assertion by a powerful state of the true principles of civil independence. Now quarrels and mutual offences were suddenly forgotten, wlien the spark, tliat might have kindled a conflagration in which sacerdotal and kingly tyranny might both have perished, had to be trodden out. Rogues fell out; lionest men began to hope; but the rogues were unhappily wise, and made up their quarrel in time. BOOK II. THE MEN. D 2 CHAPTER I. Two lawyer Popes. — Similarities and contrasts. — Conscientious bigotry of Paul V. — Effects of the policy of Clement VIII. — Change in the tone of the Church. — Election and death of Leo XI. — Conclave for the election of Paul V. — Secret history of the Conclaves. — "The Con- clavisti." — Regulations for the holding of Conclaves. — Mode of pro- ceeding. — Three methods of electing a Pope. — Difficulty of following all the details of the story of a Conclave. It was in a world teeming and seething with tlie ideas and passions to which this great quarrel gave rise, tliat the two men, who are the subjects of these pages grew up to man's estate. They were just emerging from boyhood when the council closed in 1503 : and were in the prime of manhood, when tlie conflict of priestly pretensions with the claims of civil authority resulted in the assassination of Henry III., and the fttruggles and difllculties arising out of Henry IV.'s protestantism, and subsequent conver- sion. The Venetian, conversant from his early years with most of tlie men of mark among the rising genera- tion of patrician politicians, wlio were already begin- ning to perceive the goal to which priestly ambition was threatening to conduct mankind, grew to be, priest and monk as he was, the most redoubtable opponent of lier encroachments, whom Rome liad ever yet liad to deal with. The Roman, growing uj) nmiil llu; in- fluences of the Apostolic Conit, imbibed an cxagge- S9752 38 THE MEN. rated idea even of the most exaggerated theories pre- vailing in Eome's high i^hices. Camillo Borghese, afterwards Pope Paul V., born in the seventh j-ear of the Council of Trent, was in his eleventh year when it came to a conclusion, and in his fortieth when his predecessor,* Cle- ment YIII., ascended the papal throne. There was a singular similarity in the antecedents of these two Popes. Both were the sons of distinguished lawyers. Both their fathers, Tuscans alike, had been exiles from their native cities — Aldobrandino, the father of Clement VIII., from Florence, and Borghese, from Siena. Both had been driven into exile by the tyranny of the Medici. Both the fathers had found an asylum at Ptome, both had been successful in their careers, and both had destined their sons to run in the same path. Both Popes were, as the circumstances of the Church had compelled the Popes of that period to become, men of respectable private life, given to devotional practices, good and zealous churchmen, anxious above all else for the exaltation and prosjjerity of the Church. But it is difficult to imagine two men more strongly contrasted within the limits of the above general similarities. Native diversity of character may of course avail to set aside all the influences of similarity of position and circumstances. But in the case of these two Popes, there was a difference in their careers, similar as they were in their general outline, which seems to correspond very intelligibly with the different use they made of supreme power. Cii'cumstances had thrown * Notaccnrately bis immediate predecessor. Leo XI., a Medici, comes in the list of popes between them ; but he lived only twenty-six days after his elect iou. CLEMENT YIII. 39 Ippolito Aldobrandini into the world of statesmansliip. Cardinal Alessandro Farnese had constituted himself his patron at an early age ; he had been nuncio in Poland, and had had opportunities there of becoming favourably known to the different members of the house of Austria. His legal career therefore had been of so enlarged a character as to have opened to him wider views of men and things, than were accessible to a mere member of the Roman Curia. lie had seen the world, and mixed with the diplomatists of Europe ; thus leading for fifty-six years a life calculated, if not to seiwe as a desirable preparation for the exercise of a supreme bishopric of souls, yet to supply a not wholly inefficient education for a sovereign prince. Clement VIII. accordingly was an eminently politic Tope, moderate in his conduct, though as anxiously bent as any Pontiff in thef series on the maintenance and aggrandisement of the power and dignity of the Church ; cautious to a fault ; possessed of a very com- petent knowledge of the general state and tendencies of the various members of the European family ; and comprehending almost as well as a lay statesman might liave done, what was possible and what was not possible to be achieved towards establishing ecclesias- tical supremacy. The legal career and studies of Camillo Borghese had on the contrary been of a nature to i)roduce a character of most diametrically opposite disposition. 'J'he experience mankind has liad of lawyer-priests has not been such as to lead thorn to consider the combi- nation a favourable one. Tlic study and administra- tion of human law, above all, of such law as that of tbo Roman (y'nria, is not calculated to foster tbe qualities that should go to the formation of the 40 THE MEN. character of an ideal Christian priest. And the ordinary characteristics of Rome's actual priesthood are as little adapted to qualify the mind for an enlightened and large comprehension of the principles and practice of law. But the law studies and practice of Borghese had been of such a sort as to i^roduce the evils alluded to in their greatest intensity ; and above all to disqualify him for the exercise of supreme power. His life had passed in the laborious seclusion of a hardworldng lawyer, magistrate, and lastly in- quisitor. He was raised to tlie papacy because he had no political enemies. And he had no political enemies, because he was unknown to the political world of Europe. He had studied the position, pretensions, and possibilities of the Church only in the books and writings, which form the arsenal of Rome's weapons and claims. From them he had imbibed the most exaggerated ideas of the papal rights and power. And his only notion of the duty of a Pope was to assert and enforce these pretensions undeterred by any con- sideration of expediency. A narrow, hard, pedantic, despotic-minded, obstinate, and strongly conscientious man, he ascended the papal throne with a single- hearted determination to perform the duty thus placed before him. "Wholly ignorant of the state and tenden- cies of the public mind of Europe, and of all those circumstances of the various states, which taught the wiser Popes when to insist and when to temporise, he recognised no rule of conduct save that deduced from the writings in which Rome had registered her own notions of her own rights and claims. Had he even possessed the knowledge, which might have taught a more prudent and less absolute-minded man the ex- pediency of moderation and caution, the character of PAUL V. 41 his mind was such as to have prevented him from availing himself of it. He looked into the hond, and was determined to have the pound of flesh set down in it. "What ! abstain from straining to the utmost every power, and using every weapon he could lay his hand on for the enforcement of this or that point of papal claim ! Look into the books. Are they not clear on the subject. What more is to be said ? Unmuzzle at once every gun in the ecclesiastical arsenal ! Hurl anathemas and excommunications broadcast, rather than abate a jot or tolerate a delay in the satisfaction of the letter of the law. Such was the man who succeeded* in 1G05 to the calm, cautious, politic, statesman-like Clement VIII. The wise and judicious exercise of these qualities had succeeded in placing the Court of Eome in a much safer and more favourable position in Europe, than it had occupied when Clement was elected. Between the. violent high church and Spanish party, and the mode- rate royalist party in France, he had had a diflicult course to steer. The first had urged him to come to no terms with Henry IV., even when that monarch souglit reconciliation with the Holy See, but to insist on his reprobation as a relapsed heretic, and as such, incapable of absolution even by the Pontiff himself. Spain, of course, was excessively anxious to perpetuate the breach on which depended the success of all her designs on France. And a very strong party in tlie Sacred College and tlie Roman Curia ceased not to urge the Pope in this direction. The second part}', wbich from the time the King declared himself a Catholic in l'>!):i, comprehended all the more moderate • With the interval, as boa been explaiucd, of the twenty-aix days' papacy of Leu XI. 43 THE MEN. men in France, and indeed the bnlk and strength of the nation, sought the King's absolution and recon- ciliation with Rome in a manner that could hardly be refused. Nevertheless, cautious Clement hesitated long, and wlien he had made up his mind to grant the absolution, did not venture on proposing the measure openly in consistory ; but consulted each of the Cardinals separately and privately ; and declared when he had consulted them all, that two-thirds of them were in favour of according the absolution. There can be no doubt that Home acted in this matter with sound policy. The ultra- Catholicism of Spain, and the exclusive alliance with her, hampered the independence of the Eoman Court, and by destroy- ing the balance of power, placed it in a dangerous position, without affording it any corresponding advan- tages. Between the two great powers, now once again both Catholic, the Pope was far freer and more powerful, than Avliile dragged by Spain in the wake of her own ambitious and dangerous designs. Reconciled with the monarchy of France, there was no longer any need for the Church to preach that perilous docti-ine of the dependence of princes on the will of their subjects. And we find accordingly that the pens and the pulpits suddenly changed their tone. The Sorbonne dis- covered — its rector having been sent into exile for his unaccommodating consistency — that sovereigns 7cere, after all, dependent on God alone ; that the opposite doctrines were the invention of evil and perverse- mmded men ; and Church and State were once again able to shake hands over their mutual understanding, on a point which each knew to be in the long run necessary to both of them. And all this Clement had accomplished, if not with- LEO XI. 43 out giving umbrage to Spain, at least withont any- open quarrel with so exemplary Catliolic a power. But in the latter years of his papacy, when under the pressure of advancing age he had suffered nearly all power and authority to pass into the very capable hands of his nephew, the Cardinal Aldobrandino, there grew up a considerable amount of ill-feeling between that minister and Spain. The election of the next Pope became therefore a matter of extreme anxiety to the two great Catholic powers. And when the Cardinal de Medici, nearly related to the Queen of France, and one of those members of the Sacred College on whose election Spain had expressly placed a veto, was chosen as Leo XI., great was the triumph and exultation of the French. The news was received in France with illuminations and cannon-firing.* But the French triumph was cut short by the new Pope's death after a reign of twenty-six days ; and the internecine struggle of a new election had to recommence. From this struggle, as we already know, Camillo Borghese, the little known lawyer inquisitor, came forth as Paul V. But it will be Avorth our while to enter the secret precincts of the Conclave together with the members of tlie Sacred College, and look on at the jealously guarded mystery of making a Pope. We have tlie means of doing tliis very completely and satisfactorily. Tlic horror, alarm, and indignation of those h(dy fathers, could they have imagined that thf'ir proceedings within those liermetioally sealed walls should one day be detailed for the amusement and edification of heretics and barbarians, may be partly guessed by the sympathetic reader ; more espe- cially after he has read the story of their doings. Hero * nist. de la Vie du ScigDCur du rie»siB. 44. THE MEN. again, as at every turn, they are met by that detestable invention of the printing press, inexliaustible in mis- chief! Who couhl guess, when some hoary-headed okl " Conclavista," whose mind had been saturated during a hfe-time with the quintessence of subtlest intrigues and intricately tortuous party manffiuvrings, trusted his stored experience to a cautiously-guarded manuscript destined for no eyes save those of the inmost adepts of Rome's mysteries, — who could guess that the secret was to be revealed, not only to the outer world of the faithful, but to heretics, scoffers, and enemies ! Oh, the fatal, fatal printing-press ! The press has done it all. There is the volume, a little dumpty quarto, printed on shockingly bad paper in the 3'ear 1GG7, at what place there is no word to show. It is entitled, " Conclaves of the Roman Pontiffs, as many as could be found, uj) to the present time ; " and contains accounts of the elections of thirty-two Popes, beginning with Clement V., in 1305, and ending with Alexander VII., in 1G55. Some of these very curious narratives are given Avith much greater detail, and more intelligence than others. ]\ff st, but not all of them, appear to have been written by " Conclavist!," fully entitled to add, " quorum pars magna fui," to the title pages of their narrations. These " Conclavisti " were the secretaries of the Cardinals, who entered the Conclave, attended each by two * of these indispensable functionaries. They were men, the whole business of whose lives was to become consummate masters of all the inconceivably intricate labyrinth of intrigue, plotting, counter-plot- ting, and false -seeming, which never ceasing in Rome, * And sometimes by special indulgence in cases of Cardinals of vei-y LigL rank, or very infirm, by three. " CONCLAYISTI." 45 al^vays grew in energj' and activity as the probable time of a papal election drew near, and culminated in an intensity of dissimulating strategy in the Conclave. On them devolved the greater part of the negotiations and intercommunications carried on between their Eminences during their seclusion. It was their busi- ness to glide from cell to cell of the purple dignitaries, — for these curious busy creatures, like bees choosing their queen-bee, lived each in his cell, while perform- ing the operation in their carefully-closed hive ; — to outgeneral each other in spying and escaping from spies ; — to let no smallest indication of a new breach between allies, or alliance between recent opponents, of a freshly-hatched scheme, or meditated treachery escape them ; — and generally to do any work in the great mutual deception prize-match, Avhich was too dii-ty for the dignity of j)urple Eminences to be seen doing themselves. Fortunately, one of the fullest and most dramatic of these extraordinary narratives is that of the Conclave which made our Camillo Borghese, Pope Paul V., and the story of it is well worth our examination. But for the right understanding of this, it is necessary to preface it by a few words explanatory of the nature of the Conclave, and of the method of its proceedings. An anti-popular spirit, despite tlie alleged demo- cratical principles of a system which excludes the liumblcst born niiiii from none of its high places, necessarily characterises the tendencies of a power wliose leading object is to exact unbounded sub- mission. This spirit liad already abusively excluded, not only the people, but also the rank and fde of the sacerdotal order from nil voice in tlio election of the supreme Pontiffs, and had placed in the hands of the 46 THE MEN. Cardinals this all -important privilege ; when in the latter part of the thirteenth century, Gregory X. regularised in the Council of Lyons the method of proceeding to a canonical election. The Conclave, or shutting up the Cardinals in strictly guarded seclusion was then instituted. They were bound to enter into Conclave not later than ten days after the death of the Lite Pope. Absent members of the Sacred College were not to be waited for. The place of Conclave was to be a chamber of the papal palace. All access, either personal, or by writing, or communication of any kind, was prohibited. Each was to have but one domestic. Their food was to be admitted through an aperture too small to allow of the passage of a human being. Each article was to be examined to preclude the possibility of any writings being clandestinely con- veyed with it into the interior of the assembly. If they could come to no election in three days, their food was to consist for a further period of five days of one dish onlj-. After that, only bread and wine were to be allowed. And all contravention of these rules subjected the offender, be his rank or position what it might, to excommunication i2)so facto, to infam}", and to the forfeiture of any office or estate he might hold under any church in Christendom. Any undertaking, promise, or agreement, having reference to the vote of the electors was declared null ; and if it had been made under oath, the oath was abrogated.* But the rigour of these regulations, as may easily be supposed, soon fell partially into desuetude. The strict seclusion of the Conclave was, however, as it still is, maintained. When an election was to take * See Milinan's Hist, of Latin Christianity, vol. t. p. 92. CLOSING OP THE CONCLAVE. 47 place, the Cardinals proceeded with much ceremony to the Vatican on the eleventh day after the Pope's death. A range of small cells constructed of planks, and equal in number to that of the Cardinals, was con- structed in readiness for them along the galleries and in the great hall of the Vatican. Their Eminences fli-st proceeded to the Paoline chapel, where the bulls regulating the holding of Conclaves were read, and an exhortation to the strict observance of them delivered. Then the cells were distributed by lot ; each Cardinal took possession of that which fell to him, and his jirms were erected over the door of it. The master of the ceremonies then warned all present, that they should not enter the Conclave, unless they were minded to continue there until its close, be its duration what it mir'ht : and their Eminences were then free to return D to their own palaces to dine if it so pleased them ; and the Conclave chamber remained open to the visits of the ambassadors and agents, and intriguers of all sorts, until the third hour after sunset. The Cardinals, who had availed themselves of the liberty of returning to their homes, were bound to be back in their cells at that hour ; the master of the ceremonies rang a bell to warn visitors to retire ; the Conclave was closed, materially as well as metaphorically ; for the doors were walled up ; sentinels were placed by the marshal of the Conclave to guard every avenue of access to the Vatican, and the business in hand was begun. These last hours of communication with the outer world, dining which the privilege accorded to strangers of remaining in tlie place of Conclave lasted, wero ordinarily fruitl'iil in schemes and intrigues. And more than one election has turned on negotiations entered into at that last Uiomcnt. The persons who 48 THE MEN. remained walled up with their Eminences, were two Conclavists for each of tlieni, a sacristan and suh- sacristan, a seci'etary and assistant secretary, a Jesuit confessor, two physicians, a surgeon, two barbers, an apothecary, five masters of the ceremonies, a mason, a carpenter, and sixteen servants for the menial work.* The election may be accomplished in either one of three different manners. Firstly, by scrutiny, in which each Cardinal places in a vase on the altar of the Sistine chapel a billet containing his vote signed with his n