t/ *>T 
 
 Iff LA LIdKIj 'III :/ 
 
 :-J
 
 I.L..DE I.OEME. 
 
 Jf/M/tj/t'i/ a* //>< frt <//>rr/j 7t///i (/. if&i . / (/. '7it>////jt 
 
 //.(j 
 
 r /., /(////'(til.
 
 ' T H k 
 
 CONSTITUTION 
 
 O F 
 
 ENGLAND, 
 
 O R 
 
 AN ACCOUNT 
 
 OF THE 
 
 ENGLISH GOVERNMENT; 
 
 In which it is compared, both with the Republican 
 
 Form of Government, and the other 
 
 Monarchies in Europe. 
 
 By J.L. DE LOLME, Advocate, 
 
 Member of the Council of the Two Hunbred in the 
 Republic of Geneva. 
 
 A NEW EDITION, Corrected. 
 
 Ponderibue librata fuia, .... 
 
 Ovid. Met. L. I, 13, 
 
 LONDON, 
 
 Printed for G. G. J. & J. Robinson, Paternofter-Row j 
 and J. Murray, Fleet-ftreet. 
 
 MDOCLXXXVIII.
 
 
 \ A. 
 
 
 15 0CI1920' ; ;-V] 
 
 
 V/
 
 TO T HB . I c 
 
 \7U 
 
 KING. 
 
 SIRE, 
 
 TH E approbation with which 
 the Public have been pleafed 
 to favour this Work, together with 
 the nature of the fubject, embolden 
 me to lay the prefent fourth and en- 
 j larged Edition of the fame at your 
 w Majefty's feet, both as an homage, 
 and an expreflion of the defire I en- 
 ter tain , the Book may for a few 
 minutes engage the attention of a 
 ^ perfon of your deep and extenflve 
 knowledge. 
 
 o 
 
 Your Majefty's reign has, for 
 many years parr, afforded proofs 
 ^ in more refpecls than one, that, 
 |j though human wifdom may not al- 
 ways be able to anticipate difficul- 
 ties, yet, aflifted by fortitude, it can 
 
 A 2
 
 DEDICATION. 
 
 fucceed in terminating them in a 
 more favourable manner than it 
 feemed at firfl poflible to be expect- 
 ed, or even in bringing them to an 
 happy iffae. According to the com- 
 mon courfe of Nature, your Majefty 
 has only yet feen the lefs confider- 
 able part of the years of which your 
 reign is to be compofed : that the 
 part which now opens before your 
 Majefty, may be attended with a 
 degree of fatis faction proportionate 
 to your Majefty's public and private 
 virtues, to your dilinterefted go- 
 vernment, and religious regard for 
 your royal engagements, is the fond 
 hope of 
 
 Your Majefty's 
 
 Moil humble and 
 
 Mod devoted Servant, 
 
 And thefe many Years 
 Subject by Choice, 
 
 jV&y, 1784, 
 
 j. L. DE LOLME.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 Introduction - - i 
 
 Chap. I. Caufes of the Liberty of the Englijh 
 Nation. Reafons of the difference between the 
 Government of France, and that of England 
 hi England the great power of the Crown, ef- 
 pecially under the firjl Norman Kings, created art 
 Union between the Nobility and the People 6 
 
 Chap. II. A fecond Advantage England had over 
 France: it formed one undivided State 24 
 
 Chap. III. The Subjetl continued 41 
 
 Chap. IV. Of the Legijlative Power 60 
 Chap. V. Of the Executive Power - 71 
 Chap. VI. The Boundaries which the Confutation 
 has fet to the Royal Prerogative 74 
 
 C h a p . V 1 1 . The fame fubjeft continued < 7 S 
 Chap. VIII. Nezv Rejlr idiom 84 
 
 Chap. IX. Of private Liberty, or the Liberty of 
 Individuals 10a 
 
 Chap. X. On the Law in regard to Civil Matters 
 that is obferved' in England 113 
 
 Chap. XI. The SubjeR continued. The Courts of 
 Equity j 26 
 
 Chap. XIL Of Criminal Juftke 154 
 
 Chap. XIII. The Subject continued 169 
 
 Chap. XIV. The Subject concluded Laws relative 
 to Imprifonments 188
 
 CONTENTS, 
 
 BOOK II. 
 
 Chap. I. Some Advantages peculiar to tlo Englifl) 
 Confiituthn. i. The Unity of the Executive 
 Power 195 
 
 Chap. II. The Suhjetl concluded. The Executive 
 Power is more eafily confined when it is one 215 
 
 Chap. III. A fecond Peculiarity. T he Dhifion of 
 the Legiflative Power 218 
 
 Chat. IV. A third Advantage peculiar to the 
 EngliJJj Government. The Bufinefs of pro- 
 pofing Laws, lodged in the Hands of the 
 People. 229 
 
 Chap. V. /// which an Inquiry is made, whether it. 
 would be an Advantage to public Liberty that the 
 Laws fioould be enabled by the Fetes of the Peo- 
 ple at large 240 
 
 Chap. VI. Advantages that accrue to the People 
 from appointing Reprefentathes 256 
 
 Chap. VII. The SubjeS continued The Advan- 
 tages thai accrue to the People from their ap- 
 pointing Reprefentatives, ere very inconfiderable, 
 unlefs they alfo entirely trv.fi their Legiflative 
 Authority to tbtnu -7- 2 ^
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 Chap. VIII. The Subjecl concluded Eff efts that 
 have refilled in the Englifh Government 9 from 
 the 'People's Power being 6ompletely delegated to 
 their Reprefentatives 166 
 
 Chap. IX. A farther Difadvantage of Republican 
 Governments. The People are necejfarily betrayed 
 by thofe in whom they trvfl 271 
 
 Chap. X. Fundamental difference between the 
 EnglifJj Government and the Governments jujl 
 defcribed. In England all Executive Authority 
 is placed out of the hands of thofe in whom the 
 People trujl. Ufefulnefs of the Pozver of the 
 Crozun 280 
 
 Chap. XI. The Pozver s which the People them- 
 felves exercife. The Election of Members of 
 Parliament 288 
 
 Chap. XII. The Subjett continued. Liberty of 
 the Prefs 291 
 
 Chap. XIII. The Subjetl continued 305 
 
 Chap. XIV. Right of Rejijlance 314 
 
 Chap. XV. Proofs drawn from Faffs of the Truth 
 of the Principles laid down in this Work.- 
 I. The peculiar Manner in which Revolutions 
 have always been concluded in England 324 
 
 Chap. XVI. Second Difference. The Manner after 
 which the Laws for the Liberty of the Subjeft 
 are executed in England 343
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 Chap. XVII. A more inward Viezv of the Englijh 
 Government than has hitherto -been offered to the 
 Reader in the courfe of this Work. Very effen- 
 iial differences between the Englijh Monarchy, as 
 a Monarchy, and all thofe with which we art 
 acquainted 387 
 
 Chap. XVIII. How far the examples of Nations 
 that have loft their liberty, are applicable to Eng- 
 land 472 
 
 Chap. XIX. A few thoughts on the attempts that 
 may at particular times be made to abridge the 
 power of the Crown, and on fome of the dangers 
 by which fuch attempts may be attended 498 
 
 Chap. XX. A few additional Thoughts on the 
 right of taxation, lodged in the Hands of the 
 Reprefentatives of the People. What kind of 
 danger this Right may be expojed to 513 
 
 Chap. XXI. Conclujion. A few Words on the 
 Nature of the Divifwns that take Place in Eng- 
 land 5 2 &
 
 ADVERTI SEMEN T. 
 
 TH E Book on the Englifh Conflitution, 
 of Svhich a new Edition is here offered 
 to the Public was firft written in French, and 
 published in Holland. Several perfons have a Iked 
 me the queftion, how I came to think of treating 
 fuch a fubje& ? One of the firft things in this 
 Country, that engages the attention of a Stranger 
 who is in the habit of obferving the objects before 
 him, is the peculiarity of its Government : I had 
 moreover been lately a witnefs of the broils which 
 had for fome time prevailed in the Republic in 
 which I was born, and of the revolution by 
 which they were terminated. Scenes of that 
 kind, in a State which, though fmall, is indepen- 
 dent, and contains within itfelf the principles of 
 its motions, had naturally given me fome compe- 
 tent infight into the firft real principles of Go- 
 vernments : owing to this circumftance, and per- 
 haps alfo to fome moderate fhare of natural abi- 
 
 A
 
 ji ADVERTISEMENT* 
 
 Ikies, I was enabled to perform the ta fie I had un- 
 dertaken, with tolerable fuccefs. I was twenty- 
 feven years old when I firft came to this Country: 
 after having been in it only a year, I began to write 
 my work, which I pubiifhed about nine months 
 afterwards : and have fince been furprifld to find 
 that I had committed fo few errors of a certain kind : 
 I certainly was fortunate in avoiding to enter deeply 
 into thofe articles with which I was not fufficicntly 
 acquainted. 
 
 The Book met with rather a favourable recep- 
 tion on the Continent ; feveral fucceffive Editions 
 having been made of it. And it alfo met here 
 with approbation, even from Men of eppofite 
 parties ; which, in this Country was no fmall 
 luck for a Bock on fyftematical politics. Al- 
 lowing trnt there was fome connexion and clear- 
 nefs, as well as novelty, in the arguments, I 
 think the work was of fome peculiar utility, if 
 the epoch at which it was pubiifhed, is confidered ; 
 which was, though without any defign from me, 
 at the time when the difputes with the Colonies 
 were beginning to take a ferious turn, both here 
 and in America. A work which contained a fpe- 
 cious, if not thoroughly true, confutation of 
 thofe political notions by the help of which a 
 difunion of the Empire was endeavoured to be 
 promoted (which confutation was moreover no- 
 ticed by Men in the higheft places) mould have 
 procured to the Author fome fort of real enecu-
 
 ADVERTISEMENT iii 
 
 ragernent j at leaft the publication of it fhould 
 not have drawn him into any inconvenient fituu- 
 tion. When my enlarged Englifh Edition was 
 ready for the prefs, had I acquainted Miniflers 
 that I was preparing to boil my tea-kettle with it, 
 for want of being able conveniently to afford the 
 eexpence of printing it, I do not pretend to fay 
 what their anfwer would have been , but I am 
 firmly of opinion, that, had the like arguments 
 in favour of the cxifting Government of this 
 Country, again ft republican principle?, been (hewn 
 to Charles the Firft, or his Miniflers, at a cer- 
 tain period of his reign, they would have very 
 willingly defrayed the expences of the publica- 
 tion. In defect of encouragement from Great 
 
 Men (and even from Bookfeilers) I had recnurfe 
 to a fubfeription , and my having expected any 
 fuccefs from fuch a plan, (hews that my know- 
 ledge of this Country was at that time but very in- 
 complete (a). 
 
 (a) In regard to two Subfciibers In particular, I was, 
 I confefs, fadly difippointed. Though all the Bookfeilers 
 in London had at lint refufed to have any thing to do with, 
 my Englifli Edition (notwithftanding the French Work was 
 extremely well known), yet, foon after I had thought of the 
 expedient of a Subfcription, I found that two of them, 
 who are both living, had begun a traafhtion, on the re- 
 commendation, as they told me, of a noble Lord, whom 
 they named, who had, till a few years before, filled one of 
 the higheft offices under the Crown. I paid them ten 
 po.inds, in order to engage them to drop their under- 
 
 A x
 
 iv ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 After mentioning the advantages with which 
 my Work has not been favoured, ic is however 
 juft I fliould give an account of thofe by which it 
 has been attended. In the firft place, as is above 
 
 taking, about which I underftood they already had bees at 
 fome expence. Had the Noble Lord in queftion favoured 
 me with his fubfcription, I wo uld have celebrated the 
 generosity and munificence of my Patron ; but as he did not 
 think proper ib to do, [ fhall only obfsrve that his recom- 
 mending my Work to a Bookfeller, coil me ten pounds. 
 
 At the time the above fubfcription for my Englifh Edi- 
 tion was advertifing, a copy of the French Work was 
 afked of me for a Noble Earl, then inveiled with a high 
 office in the State ; none being at that time to be found 
 at any Bookseller's in London. I gave the only copy 
 I had (the confequencc was, that 1 was obliged to borrow 
 one, to make my Englifh Edition from) ; and I added, that 
 1 noped his Lordfhip would honour me with his fubfcrip- 
 tion. However, my hopes were here again confounded. 
 As a gentleman, who continues to fill an important office 
 undjr the Crown, accidentally informed me about a 
 year afterwards, that the Noble Lord here alluded to, 
 had lent him my French work, I had no doubt left that 
 the copy I had delivered, had reached hi; Lordlhip's hand ; 
 I therefore prefuned to remind him by a letter, that the 
 Book in queftion had never been paid for ; at the fame time 
 apologizing for fuch liberty from the circumftances in which 
 my late Englifh Edition had been published, which did not 
 allow me to lofe one copy. I muft do his Lcrdfhip (who 
 is moreover a Knight of the Garter) thejuftice to acknow- 
 ledge, that no later than a week afterwards, he fent two 
 half crowns for me to a Bookfeller's in Fleet-fircet. A 
 Lady brought them in a coach, who took a receipt. As f!ie
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 faid, Men of high rank have condescended to 
 give their approbation to it ; and I take this 
 opportunity of returning them my moft humble 
 acknowledgments. In the fecond place, after 
 the difficulties by which the publication of the 
 Book had been attended and followed^ were over- 
 come, I began to (hare with Bookfellers in the 
 profits arifing from the fale of it. Thefe profits 
 I indeed thought to be but fcanty and flow : but 
 then I confidered this was no more than the com- 
 mon complaint made by every Trader in regard 
 to his g^in, as well as by every Great A4an 
 in regard to his emoluments and his penfions. 
 After a courfe of fome years, the net balance 
 formed by the profits in queflion, amounted to a 
 certain fum, propoitioned to the bignefs of the 
 performance. And, in fine, I muft add to the 
 account of the many favours I have received, that 
 I was allowed to carry on the abeve bufinefs of fell- 
 ing my book, without any objection being formed 
 
 was, by the Bookfciler's account, a fine Lady, though not 
 a Peerefs, it gave me much concern that J was not prcfent 
 to deliver the receipt to her myfelf. 
 
 At the fame time I mention the noble Earl's great punc- 
 tuality, I think I may be allowed to fay a word of my own 
 merits. I waited, before I prcfumed to trouble his Lord- 
 fhip, till I was informed that a penfion of four thoufand 
 pounds waj fettled upon him (I could have wiflied much 
 my own Creditors, had, about that time, fiievvu the like 
 tendernefs to me), and I moreover gave him time to receive 
 the firft quarter. 
 
 A 3
 
 vi ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 againft me from my not having ferved a regular 
 a.rprenticefhip and without being molefted by the 
 Inquisition Several Authors have chofen to 
 relate, in Writings publiflied after death, the 
 perfonal advantages by which their performances 
 had been followed : as for me, I have thought 
 Otherwife ; and, fearing that during the latter part 
 of my life I may be otherwife engaged, I have pre- 
 ferred to write now the account of my fucceffes 
 in this Country, and to fee it printed while I am 
 yet living. 
 
 I mall add to the above narrative (whatever the 
 Pieader may be pleafed to think of it) a few obfer- 
 vations of rather a more ferious kind, for the fake 
 of thofe perfons who, judging themfelves to be pof- 
 feiTed of abilities, find they are negleaed by thofe 
 having it in their power to do them occafional fer- 
 vices, and fiuTer themfelves to be mortified by it. 
 To hope that men will in earneft afhft in fetting 
 forth the mental qualifications of others, is an ex- 
 pedition which, generally fpeaking, muft needs be 
 difappointed. To procure one's notions- and opi- 
 nions to be attended to, and approved, by the circle 
 of one's acquaintance, is the univerfal wifh of 
 Mankind. To diffufe thefe notions farther, to nu- 
 merous Parts of the Public, by means of the prefs or 
 by others, becomes an object of real ambition : nor 
 h this ambition ahvr.ys propottioned to the real abi- 
 lities of thofe who feel it ; very far from it. When 
 the approbation of Mankind is in queftion, all per.
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. vii 
 
 fons, whatever their different ranks may be, confi- 
 jder themfclves as being engaged in the fame ca- 
 reer : they look upon themfclves as being candi- 
 dates for the very fame kind of advantage : high 
 and low, all are in that refpect in a ftate of pri- 
 maeval equality , nor are thofe who are likely to 
 obtain fome prize, to expect much favour from the 
 others. 
 
 This defire of having their ideas communicated 
 to, and approved by, the Public, was very preva- 
 lent among the Great Men of the Roman Com- 
 monwealth, and afterwards with the Roman Em- 
 perors ; however imperfect the means of obtaining 
 thefe ends might be in thofe days, compared with 
 thofe which ar ufed in our's. The fame deOre has 
 been equally remarkable among modern European 
 kings, not to fpeak cf other parts of the World ; 
 and a long catalogue of Royal Authors may be pro- 
 duced. Minitters, efpecially after having loft their 
 places, have (hewn no lefs inclination than their 
 Matters, to convince Mankind of the reality of 
 their knowledge. Noble Perfcns of all denomina- 
 tions, have increaf d the catalogue. And to 
 fpeak of the Country in which we arc, there is 
 it feerns no good re^fon to make any e\certion in 
 regard to it ; and Great Men in it, or in general 
 thofe who are at the head of the People, are we 
 find fufliciently anxious about the fuccefs of their 
 Speeches, or cf the printed performances which they 
 
 A 4
 
 x'm ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 fometimes condcfcend to lay before the Public; 
 nor has it been every Great Man wifhing that a 
 compliment may be paid to his perfonal knowledge, 
 that has ventured to give fuch lading fpecimtns. 
 
 Several additions were made to this Work, at 
 the time I gave the firtt Englifh Edition of it. Be- 
 sides a more accurate divifion of the chapters, fe- 
 yeril new notes and paragraphs were inferred in 
 it ; for inflance in the nth chapter of the 2d Book ; 
 and three new chapters, the 15th, 16th, and 17th, 
 amounting to about ninety pages, were added to 
 the fame Book. Thefe three additional chapters, 
 never having been written by me in French, have 
 been inferted in the third Edition made at Amfler- 
 tlam, tranflated by aPerfon whom the Dutch Book- 
 feller employed for that purpofe : as I never had an 
 opportunity to perufe a copy of that Edition, I 
 cannot fay how well the Tranflator has performed 
 his talk. Having now parted with the copy-right 
 of the Book, I have farther added four new chapters 
 to it (10, II, B. I. 19, 20, B. II.) by way of taking 
 a final leave of it ; and in order the more com- 
 pletely to effect this, I may perhaps give, in a few 
 months, a French Edition of the fame (which I 
 cannot tell why I have not done fooner) in which 
 all the above mentioned additions, tranflated by 
 inyfelf, (hall be inferted.
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. ix 
 
 In one of the former additional Chapters (the 
 17th, B. II.) mention is made of a peculiar cir- 
 cumftance attending the Englifh Government, con- 
 fidered as a Monarchy, which is the foiidity of the 
 power of the Crown. As one proof of this pecu- 
 liar foiidity, it is remarked, in that Chapter, that 
 all the Monarchs who ever exifted, in any part 
 of the World, were never able to maintain their 
 .ground againft certain powerful fubje&s (or a 
 combination of them) without the afTiftance of re- 
 gular forces at their cenftant command ; whereas it 
 is evident that the power of the Crown, in Eng- 
 land, is not at this day* fupported by fuch means ; 
 nor even had the Englifh Kings a guard of more 
 than a few fcores of Men, when their power, and 
 the exertions they at times made of it, were equal 
 to what has ever been related of the mod abfolute 
 Roman Emperors. 
 
 The caufe of this peculiarity in the Englifh Go- 
 vernment is faid in the fame Chapter, to lie in the 
 circuftance of the great or powerful iVIen, in Eng- 
 land, being divided into two dittinct AiTemblies, 
 and at the fame time, in the principles on which 
 fuch a divifion is formed. To attempt to gU-e a de- 
 monftration of this aflertion other wife than by facls 
 (as is done in the Chanter here alluded to) would 
 lead into difficulties which the reader is little aware 
 of. In genera!, the Science of Politics, confidered 
 as an ex-nl Science, that is to fay, as a Science capa- 
 ble of actual demonftration, is infinitely deeper than 
 {he reader fo much perhaps as fufpecls. The know-
 
 x ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 ledge of Man, on which fuch a Science, with its 
 preliminary axioms and definition^ is to be ground- 
 ed, has hitherto remained furprifingly imperfect : 
 as one inftance, how little Man is known to him- 
 feif it might be mentioned that no tolerable ex- 
 planation of that continual human phenomenon, 
 laughter, has been given, as yet ; and the power- 
 ful complicate fenfation which each fex produces 
 in the other, (till remains an equally inexplicable 
 myfiery. 
 
 To conclude the above digreffion (which may do 
 very well for a Preface ) I fhall only add, that thofe 
 Speculators who will amufe themfelves in feeking 
 for the demonflration of the political Theorem above 
 expreffed, will thereby be led through a field of 
 obfervations which they will at fir ft little expect ; 
 and in their way towards attaining fuch demonstra- 
 tion, will find the Science, commonly called Me- 
 taphyfics, to be at bed but a very fuperficial 
 one, and that the Mathematics, or at lead the 
 mathematical reafonings hitherto ufed hy. Men, 
 are not fo completely free from error as has been 
 thought (a). 
 
 (a) Certain errors that are not difcovercd, arc, in feve- 
 ral cafes, compenfated by others, which arc equally un- 
 perceived. 
 
 Continuing to avail myfelf of the indulgence an Au- 
 thor has a right to claim in a Preface, I fnali mention, r.s
 
 ADVERTISEMENT, xi 
 
 Out of the four Chapters added to the prefent 
 Edition, two (the ioth and nth, B.I.) contain 
 among other thing?, a few ilrictures on the Courts 
 of Equity ; in which I wifn it may be found I 
 have not been miflaken : of the two others, the one 
 (19th, B. II.) contains a few obfervations on the 
 attempts that may in different circumftances be 
 made, to fet new limits on the authority of the 
 Crown , and in the 20th, a few general thoughts 
 are introduced on the right of taxation, and on the 
 claim of the American Colonies in that refoecT:. 
 Any farther obfervations I may hereafter make on 
 the Englifh Government, fuch as comparing it 
 with the other Governments of Europe, and exa- 
 mining what difference in the manners of the inha- 
 bitants of this Country may have refulted from it, 
 muft come in a new Work, if I ever undertake to 
 treat thefe fubje&s. In regard to the American uif- 
 putes, what I may hereafter write on that account, 
 will be introduced in a Work which I may at feme 
 future time publifn, under the title of Hijioirc de 
 George Trots, Roi d' Artgleterre, or, perhaps, of Hif- 
 toire a Angleterre, depuis Vannu 1765 (that in which 
 
 a farther explanation of the peculiarity in the Englifh Go- 
 vernment above alluded to, and which is again touched 
 upon in the poftfeript to this Advenifement, thar a Go- 
 vernment may be confitJered as a great Billet or Dance, 
 in which, the fame as in other Ballets, every thin*' de- 
 pends on the difpofition of the figures.
 
 xii ADVERTISE M E N T. 
 
 the American Stamp duty was laid) jufqucs a T annie 
 178 , meaning that in which an end fhall be put to 
 the prefent corners {a). 
 Nov. 1781-. 
 
 P O S T C R I P T. 
 
 Notwithstanding the intention above exprcfled, of 
 making no additions to the prefent Work, I have 
 found it necefiary, in the prefent new Edition, to 
 render fomewhat more complete the xviith Chapter, 
 B. II. p. 587. On the peculiar foundations cf the Eng- 
 lijb Monarchy > as a Monarchy , as I found its ten- 
 dency not to be very well underftood ; and in fact, 
 that Chapter contained little more than hints on the 
 fubjecl: mentioned in it : the talk, in the courfe of 
 writing, has increafed beyond my expectation, and 
 has fwelled the Chapter to about fixty pages beyond 
 what it was in the former Edition, fo as almoft to 
 make it a kind of a feparate Book by itfelf. The 
 reader will now find in it feveral remarkable new in- 
 flances to prove the fact: of the peculiar futility of 
 the executive power of the Britifh Crown ; and 
 efpecially a much more complete delineation of the 
 advantages that refult from the liability in favour of 
 public liberty (b). 
 
 [a) A certain Book written in French, on the fubjec~t 
 of the American difputcs, was, I have been told, lately 
 attributed to me, in which I had no (hare. 
 
 (b) Fcr rhe fake of thofe Readers who like exactly to
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. xin 
 
 Thefe advantages may be enumerated as fol- 
 lows. I. The numerous reflaints the governing 
 authority is able to bear, and extenfive freedom it. 
 can afford to allow the Subject, at its expence. 
 II. The liberty of fpeaking and writing, carried to 
 the great extent it is in England. III. The un- 
 bounded freedom of the Debates in the Lcgiflature. 
 IV. The power to bear the conftant union of all 
 rders of Subjects againfl its prerogative. V. The 
 freedom allowed to all individuals to take an active 
 part in Government concerns. VI. The Uriel im- 
 partiality with which Juflice is dealt to all Sub- 
 jects, without any refpeCT whatever of perfons. 
 VII. The lenity of the criminal law, both in re- 
 gard to the mildnefs of punifhments, and the fre- 
 quent remitting of them. VIII. The flricl compli- 
 ance of the governing Authority with the letter of the 
 law. IX. The needlefTuefs of an armed force to fup- 
 port itfelf by, and as a confequence, the lingular fub- 
 jettion of the Military to the Civil power. 
 
 The above mentioned advantages are peculiar to 
 the Englifh Government. To attempt to imitate 
 them, or transfer them into other Countries, with 
 that degree of extent to which they are carried 
 
 know in what one Edition of a Book differs from another. 
 I fhall mention, that five new pages have alfo been added 
 in the xviiith Chapter, viz. page 482 486, befides a few 
 (hott notes in the courfe of the Work ; for inftancc in 
 P-ge I4> 5 8 4> &c.
 
 *iv ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 in*England, without at the fame time transferring 
 the whole Order and conjunction of circumflances 
 in the Englifh Government, would prove unfuccefs- 
 ful attempts. Several articles of Englifh liberty 
 already appear impracticable to be preferved in the 
 new American Commonwealths. The Irifh Na- 
 tion have of late fucceeded to imitate feveral very- 
 important regulations in the Englifh Government, 
 and are very defirous to render the aflimilation 
 complete : yet, it is poflible, they will find many 
 inconveniences to arife from their endeavours, 
 which do not take place in England, pothwithftand- 
 ing the very great general fimilarity of circumflances 
 in the two kingdoms in many refpecls, and even 
 alfo, we might add, notwithstanding the refpeclable 
 power and weight the Crown derives from its 13ri- 
 tifh dominions, both for defending its prerogative in 
 Ireland, and preventing anarchy. I fay, the fimila- 
 rity in many refpcSls between the two kingdoms *, for 
 this refem'olance may perhaps fail in regard to fome 
 important points : however, this is a fubjeci about 
 which I (hall not attempt to fay any thing, not 
 having the necefliiry information. 
 
 The lad Chapter in the Work, concerning the 
 nature of the Divijions that take place in this Coun- 
 try, I have left in every Englifh Edition as I wrote 
 it at full in French. With refpect to the exact 
 manner of the Debates in Parliament, mentioned in 
 that Chapter, I mould not be able to fay more at pre- 
 sent than I was at that time, as I never had an oppor- 
 tunity to hear the Debates in either Houfe. In re-
 
 ADVERTISEMENT, x* 
 
 gard to the Divifzons in general to which the fpirit 
 of party gives rife, I did perhaps the bulk of the 
 People fomewhat more honour than they really de- 
 ferve, when I reprefented them as being free from 
 any violent difpofitions in that refpeft : I have fince 
 found, that, like the bulk of Mankind in all Coun- 
 tries, they fuffer themfelves to be influenced by vehe- 
 ment prcpoffeffions for this or that fide of public 
 queftion-, commonly in proportion as their know- 
 ledge of the fubjecls, is imperfect. It is however 
 a fact, that their political prepofieffions and party 
 fpirit are not productive in this Country, of 
 thof.: dangerous confequences which might be 
 feared from the warmth with which they are fome- 
 timcs manifcfted. But this fubject, or in general 
 the fubjedl of the political quarrels and divilions in 
 this Country is not an article one may venture to 
 meddle with in a fingle Chapter ; I have therefore 
 let this fubfift, without touching it, 
 
 I fhall however obferve, before I conclude, that 
 there is an accidental circumftance in the Englifh 
 Government, which prevents the party fpirit by 
 which the Public are ufualiy influenced, from pro- 
 ducing thofe lading and rancorous divifions in the 
 Community which have peftered fo many other free 
 States, making of the fame Nation as it were two 
 diftincl: People, in a kind of conftant warfare with 
 each other. The circumftance I mean, is, the 
 frequent reconciliations (commonly to quarrel again 
 afterward) that take place between the Leaders 
 of parties, by which the moil violent and ignorant
 
 xvi * ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 Clafs of their partizans are bewildered, and made t 
 lofe the fcent. By the frequent coalitions between 
 Whig and Tory Leaders, even that party diftin&ion, 
 the mod famous in the Englifh Hiftory, has now be- 
 come ufelefs : the meaning of the words has thereby 
 been rendered fo perplexed that nobodycan any longer 
 give a tolerable definition of them ; and thofe per- 
 fons who now and then aim at gaining popularity 
 by claiming the merit of belonging to either party, 
 are fcarcely understood. The late Coalition between 
 two certain Leaders has done away and prevented 
 from fettling, that violent party fpirit to which the 
 adminiftration of Lord Bute had given rife, and 
 which the American difputes had carried ftill far- 
 ther. Though this Coalition has met with much 
 obloquy, I take the liberty to rank myfelf in the 
 number of its advocates, fo far as the circumftancc 
 here mentioned. 
 
 May y 1784.
 
 THE 
 
 CONSTITUTION 
 
 O F 
 
 ENGLAND. 
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 ^*~] ~*A H E fpirit of Philofophy which pe- 
 culiarly diftinguilhes the prefent age, 
 -** after having corrected a number of 
 errors fatal to Society, feems now to be directed 
 towards the principles of Society itfelf; and 
 we fee prejudices vanifli, which are difficult to 
 overcome, in proportion as it is dangerous to 
 attack them (a). This rifing freedom of fen- 
 
 (a) As every popular notion which may contribute 
 to the fupport of an arbitrary Government, is at all times 
 vigilantly prote&ed by the whole ftrength of it, political 
 
 B
 
 2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 timent, the necefTary forerunner of political 
 freedom, led me to imagine that it would not 
 be unacceptable to the Public, to be made ac- 
 quainted with the principles of a Conftitution 
 on which the eye of curiofity feems now to be 
 univerfally turned; and which, though cele- 
 brated as a model of perfection, is yet but 
 little known to its admirers. 
 
 I am aware that it will be deemed prefump- 
 tuous in a Man who has parTed the greateft part 
 of his life out of England, to attempt a de- 
 lineation of the Englifn Government j a fyfteci 
 which is fuppofed to be fo complicated as not 
 to be underltood or developed, but by thofe 
 who have been initiated in the mvfteries of it 
 
 J 
 
 from their infancy. 
 
 But, though a foreigner in England, yet, as 
 a native of a free Country, I am no ftranger 
 to thofe circumfrances which conftitute or cha- 
 racterife liberty. Even the great difpropor- 
 tion between the Republic of which I am 
 
 prejudices are, lr.fi of all, if ever, fhaken off by a Nation 
 fubjetted to fuch a Government. A great change in this 
 yefped, however, has of late taken place in France, 
 where this book was nrfl publifhed, and opinions are low 
 difcufled there, and tenets avowed, which in the time of 
 Lewis the Fourteenth, would have appeared downright 
 blafphemy : it is to this an allufion is made above.
 
 Of ENGLAND, 3 
 
 a member, and in which I formed my prin- 
 ciples, and the Britiih Empire, has perhaps 
 only contributed to facilitate my political in- 
 quiries. 
 
 As the Mathematician the better to difcover 
 the proportions he invefligates, begins with 
 freeing his equation from coefficients, or fuch other 
 quantities as only perplex without properly 
 conitituting it, fo it may be advantageous to 
 the inquirer after the caufes that produce the 
 equilibrium of a government, to have previously 
 ftudied them, difengaged from the apparatus 
 of fleets, armies, foreign trade, diftant and 
 extenfive dominions, in a word, from all thofe 
 brilliant circumftances which fo greatly afreet 
 the external appearance of a powerful Society. 
 but have no eifcntial connection with the real 
 principles of it. 
 
 It is upon the pafiions of Mankind, that is 
 upon caufes which are unalterable, that the ac- 
 tion of the various parts of a State depends. 
 The machine may vary as to its dimenfions, 
 but its movement and acting fprings {till re- 
 main intrinfically the fame; and that time can- 
 not be confidered as loft, which has been fpent 
 in feeing them act and move in a narrower 
 circle.
 
 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 One other confidcration I will fuo-p-efh which 
 is, that the very circumftance of being a to- 
 reigner, may of itfelf be attended, in this cafe, 
 with a degree of advantage. The Englim 
 themfelves (the obfervation cannot give them 
 any offence) having their eyes open, as I may 
 lay, upon their libeity, from their firft entrance 
 into life, arc perhaps too much familiarifed 
 with its enjoyment, to enquire, with real con- 
 cern, into its caufes. Having acquired practi- 
 cal notions of their government, long before 
 they have meditated on it, and thefe notions 
 beim r flowlv and gradually imbibed, thev at 
 length behold it without any high degree of 
 fenfibility; and they feern to me, in this refpedt, 
 to be like the reclnfe inhabitant of a palace, 
 who is perhaps in the worft lunation for attain- 
 ing a complete idea of the whole, and never 
 experienced the finking effect of its external 
 ftrudture and elevation; or, if you pleafe, like 
 a Man who, having always had a beautiful and 
 extenfive iccm before his eyes, continues for 
 ever to view it with indifference. 
 
 But a ftranp-er, behold mi at once the vari- 
 ous parts of a Conftitution difplayed before 
 him, which at the fame time that it carries 
 liberty to its height, has guarded againft in-
 
 OF ENGLAND. $ 
 
 conveniences feeminelv inevitable, behold ins: 
 in lhort thoie things carried into execution, 
 which he had ever regarded as more defirable 
 than poffible, he is ftruck with a kind of ad- 
 miration; and it is neceiTary. to be thus frrongly 
 affected by objects, to be enabled to reach the 
 general principle which governs them. 
 
 Not that I mean to inlinuate that I have pe- 
 netrated with more acutenefs into the Conit'i- 
 tution of England than others; my only de- 
 fign in the above obfervations, was to obviate 
 an unfavourable, though natural, prepoiTeflion ; 
 and if, either in treating of the caufes which 
 originally produce the EngliOi liberty, or of 
 thole by which it continues to be maintained, 
 my obfervations mould be found new or iineu- 
 lar, I hope the Englith reader will not condemn 
 them, but where they mall be found incon- 
 fiftent with Hiitory, or with daily experience. 
 Of readers in general I alfo rcqueft, that they 
 will not judge of the principles I mall lay 
 down, but from their relation to thofe of hu- 
 man nature: a confideration which is almott 
 the only one effential, and has been hitherto too 
 much neglected by the Writers on the fubjedfc 
 pf government.
 
 6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 CHAP. I. 
 
 Caufes of the liberty of the Englijb Nation. 
 Reafons of the difference between the Govern- 
 ment of England, and that of France, In 
 England, the great power of the Crozvn, under 
 the Norman kings, created an union between the 
 Nobility and the People. 
 
 J HEN the Romans, attacked on all 
 fides by the Barbarians, were reduced 
 to the neceffity of defending the centre of their 
 Empire, they abandoned Great Britain as well 
 as feveral other of their diftant provinces. 
 The ifland, thus left to itfelf, became a prey 
 to the Nations inhabiting the fhores of the 
 Baltic j who, having fir ft deftroyed the ancient 
 inhabitants, and for a long time reciprocally 
 annoyed each other, eftablifhed feveral Sove- 
 reignties in the fouthern part of the Ifland, af- 
 terwards called England, which at length were 
 united, under Egbert, into one Kingdom. 
 
 The fucceffors of this Prince, denominated 
 the Anglo-Saxon Princes, among whom Alfred 
 the Great and Edward the ConfefTor are particu- 
 larly celebrated, reigned for about two hundred 
 years: but, though our knowledge of the prii}-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 7 
 
 cipal events of this early period of the Englifh 
 Hiftory is in fome degree exact, yet we have 
 but vague and uncertain accounts of the nature 
 of the Government which thofe Nations intro- 
 duced. 
 
 It appears to have had little more affinity 
 with the prefent Conftitution, than the general 
 relation, common indeed to all the Govern- 
 ments eftablifhed by the Northern Nations, 
 that of having a King and a Body of Nobi- 
 lity; and the ancient Saxon Government is 
 ( Jeft us in (lory (to ufe the expreffions of 
 ec . fir William Temple on the fubject) but like 
 Cf fo many antique, broken, or defaced pic- 
 e( tures, which may {till reprefent fomething 
 " of the cuftoms and fafhions of thofe ages, 
 <( though little of the true lines, proportions, 
 iC or refemblance (a)." 
 
 It is at the era of the Conqueft, that we are 
 to look for the real foundation of the Enpdifh 
 Conftitution. From that period, fays Spelman, 
 novus feclorum nafcitur ordo (). William of Nor- 
 mandy, having defeated Harold, and made 
 
 {a) See his Introduction to the Hiftory of England. 
 
 {b) See Spelman, Of Parliaments. It has been a 
 favourite thefis with many Writer., to pretend that the 
 Saxon. Government was, at the time of the Concjueft, by 
 
 B4
 
 8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 himfelf mafler of the Crown, fubverted the 
 ancient fabric of the Saxon Lejriflation : he 
 
 no means fubverted ; that William of Normandy le- 
 gally acceded to the Throne, and confequently to the en- 
 gagements of the Saxon Kings; and much argument has 
 in particular been employed with regard to the word Con- 
 quefi, which, it has been faid, in the feudal fcnfe only 
 meant aequijition. Thefe opinions have been particularly 
 infilled upon in times of popular oppofition: and, indeed, 
 there uas a far greater probability of fuccefs, in raifing 
 among the People the notions familiar to them of legal 
 claims and long eitablifhed culbms, than in arguing with 
 them from the no lefs rational, but lefs determinate, and 
 fomewhat dangerous doctrines, concerning the original 
 rights of Mankind, and the lawfulnefs of at all times x>p- 
 pofir.g force to an oppreflive Government. 
 
 But if we confider that the manner in which the 
 public Power is formed in a State, is fo very effential a 
 part of its Government, and that a thorough change in 
 this refpecl was introduced into England by the Concmeft, 
 we (hall not fcruple to allow that a new Government was 
 eftablifhed. Nay, as almoft the whole landed property 
 in the Kingdom was at that time transferred to other 
 hands, a new Syftem of criminal Juftice introduced, and 
 the language of the law moreover altered, the revolution 
 may be faid to have been fuch as is not perhaps to be 
 paralleled in the Hiilory of any other Country. 
 
 Some Saxon laws, favourable to the liberty of the 
 people, were indeed again eftabhflied under the fuc- 
 ceffors of William ; but the introduction of fome new 
 modes of proceeding in the Courts of Juilice, and of a 
 few particular laws, cannot, fo long as the ruling P&\yer
 
 OFENGLAND. 9 
 
 exterminated, or expelled, the former occu- 
 piers of lands, in order to distribute their pof- 
 ieffions among his followers; and ellablilhed 
 the feudal fyftem of Government, as better 
 adapted to his fituation, and indeed the only one 
 of which he poffeffed a competent idea. 
 
 in the State remains the fame, be fa id to be the intro- 
 duction of a new Government ; and as when the laws 
 in queftion were again eftabliihed, the public power in. 
 England continued in the fame channel where the Con- 
 queil has placed it, they were more properly new modi- 
 fications of the Anglo-Norman Conltitution, than they 
 were the abolition of it ; or fince they were again adopted 
 from the Saxon Legiflatlon, they were rather imitations 
 of that legiflation, than the reftoration of the Saxon Go- 
 vernment. 
 
 Contented, however, with the two authorities I have 
 above quoted (Spehnan and Temple), I (hall dwell no 
 longer on a difcuffion of the preciie identity, or differ- 
 ence, of two Governments, that is of two ideal fy- 
 ftems, which only exift. in the conceptions cf men. Nor 
 do 1 wifh to explode a doctrine, which, in the opinion 
 of fome perfons, giving an additional fanclion and dig- 
 nity to the Englilh Government, contributes to increafe 
 their love and refpedt for it. It will be fufricient for my 
 purpofe, if the reader fhail be plsafed to grant that a 
 material change was, at the time of the Conquer!:, c ffected. 
 in the Government then exifting, and is accordin lv dif- 
 pofed to admit the proofs that will prefently be la^l before 
 him, of fuch cban e having prepared the effablilhment of 
 the prefent Engiifn Conftitutipn.
 
 io THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 This fort of Government prevailed alfo in 
 almoft all the other parts of Europe. But, 
 inftead of being eftablifhed by dint of arms 
 and all at once, as in England, it had only 
 t>een eftablifhed on the Continent, and particu- 
 larly in France, through a long feries of flow 
 fucceflive events; a difference of circumftances 
 this, from which confequences were in time to 
 arife, as important as they were at firfl difficult 
 to be forefeen. 
 
 The German Nations who palled the Rhine 
 to conquer Gaul, were in a great degree inde- 
 pendent. Their Princes had no other title to 
 their power, but their own valour and the free 
 election of the people; and as the latter had 
 aequired in their forefts but contracted notions 
 of fovereign authority, they followed a Chief, 
 lefs in quality of fubjccls, than as companions 
 in conqueft. 
 
 Befides, this conqueft was not the irruption 
 of a foreign army, which only takes poiTeffion 
 of fortified towns. It was the general invafion 
 of a whole People, in fearch of new habitations; 
 and as the number of the Conquerors bore a 
 great proportion to that of the conquered, who 
 were at the fame time enervated by long peace, 
 the expedition was no fooner completed thai;
 
 OF ENGLAND. it 
 
 ell danger was -at an end, and of courfe their 
 union alfo. After dividing among themfelves 
 what lands they thought proper to occupy, they 
 feparated; and though their tenure was at firft 
 only precarious, yet in this particular, they de- 
 pended not on the King, but on the general 
 aflembly of the Nation (a). 
 
 Under the Kings of the firjl race, the fiefs, 
 by the mutual connivance of the Leaders, at 
 firft became annual; afterwards, held for life. 
 Under the defcendants of Charlemain, they be- 
 came hereditary (), And when at length Hugh 
 Capet effected his own election to the prejudice 
 of Charles of Lorrain, intended to render the 
 Crown, which in fadt was a fief, hereditary in 
 his own family (c), he eftablifhed the hereditari- 
 fhip of fiefs as a general principle; and from 
 
 (a) The fiefs were originally called, terra jure beneficii 
 concejfte ; and it was not till under Charles le Grcs the 
 term fief began to be in ufe. See Beneficium, Glojf. 
 J)u Cange. 
 
 {b) Apud Francos <vero, fenjim pedetentimque, jure hareM- 
 tarto ad b&redes tranfieruut feuda; quod labente faculo nono 
 incipis. See Feudum Du Cange. 
 
 (c) Hottoman has proved beyond a doubt, in his Fran- 
 cogallia, that under the two firfr. races of Kings, the 
 Crown of France was elective. The Princes of the 
 reigning family had nothing more in their favour, than 
 he cuftom of chufing one of that ho^fe.
 
 12 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 this epoch, authors date the complete eftabliih.- 
 merit of the feudal fyftem in France. 
 
 On the other hand, the Lords who save their 
 fuftrages to Hugh Capet, forgot not the intereit 
 of their own ambition. 1 hey completed the 
 breach of thofe feeble ties which fubjedted them 
 to the royal authority, and became every where 
 independent. They left the King no juris- 
 diction cither over themfelves, or their Vaffals ; 
 they refer ved the right of waging war with 
 each other; they even afFumed the fame privi- 
 lege, in certain cafes, with regard to the Kino: 
 himfelf(tf); fo that if Hugh' Capet, by ren- 
 dering the Crown hereditary, laid the founda- 
 tion of the greatnefs of his family, and of the 
 Crown itfelf, yet he added little to his own au- 
 thority, and acquired fcarcely any thing mote 
 than a nominal fuperiority over the number of 
 
 (a) The principal of thefe cafes was when the King 
 refufed to appoint Judges to decide a difference between 
 himfclf and one of his fir it Barons; the latter had then 
 a right to take up arms againft the King; and the fub- 
 ordinate Vaffals were fo dependent on their immediate 
 Lords, that they were obliged to follow them again it the 
 Lord Paramount. St. Louis, though the power of the 
 Crown was in his time much increafed, was obliged to 
 confirm both this privilege of the fir ft Barons, and thL 
 obligation of their Vaffals.
 
 OK ENGLAND. ij 
 
 Sovereigns who then fvvarmed in France (#). 
 
 But the eftablifhment of the feudal fyflem in 
 England, was an immediate and fudden confe- 
 quence of that conqueft which introduced it. 
 Befides this conqueft was made by a Prince 
 who kept the greater part of his army in his 
 own pay, and who was placed at the head of a 
 people over whom he was an hereditary Sove- 
 reign: circumftanccs which gave a totally dif- 
 ferent turn to the Government of that kingdom. 
 
 Surrounded by a warlike, though a con- 
 quered Nation, William kept on foot pari: 
 of his army. The Englifh, and after them 
 the Normans themfelves, having revolted, he 
 crufhed both; and the new King of England, 
 at the head of victorious troops, having to do 
 with two Nations laying under a reciprocal 
 check from the enmity they bore to each other, 
 
 [a] " The Grandees of the Kingdom," fays Mezeray, 
 " thought that Hugh Capet ought to put up with all 
 " their infults, becaufe they had placed the CrowYi on 
 " his head: nay, To great was their licentioufnefs, that 
 " on his writing to Audebert, Vifcount of Perigueux, 
 tc ordering him to raife the fiege he had laid to Tours, 
 *' and aficing him, by way of reproach, who had made 
 " him a Vifcount? that Nobleman haughtily anfvvered, 
 " Not you, but thofe nvho made you a King, [Non pas 
 <f vous, mais ceux qui vous ont fait Roi.]
 
 t4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 and moreover equally fubdued by a fenfe 
 of their unfortunate attempts of refiftance, 
 found himfelf in the moft favourable circum- 
 ftances for becoming an abfolute Monarch; and 
 his laws thus promulgated in the midft as it 
 were of thunder and lightning, impofed the 
 yoke of delpotifm both on the victors and the 
 vanquifhed. 
 
 He divided England into fixty thoufand two 
 hundred and fifteen military fiefs, all held of 
 the Crown; the poffeficrs of which were, on 
 pain of forfeiture, to take up arms, and repair 
 to his ftandard on the fir ft fignal : he fubjecled 
 not only the common people, but even the Ba- 
 rons, to all the rigours of the feudal Govern- 
 ment: he even impofed en them his tyrannical 
 foreft laws (#). 
 
 He affumed the prerogative of impofing 
 taxes. He inverted himfelf with the whole 
 executive power of Government. But what 
 
 (a) He referved to himfelf an exclufive privilege of 
 killing game throughout England, and enabled the fe- 
 vereft penalties on all who fhould attempt it without his 
 permiffion. The fuppreffion, or rather mitigation of thefe 
 penalties, was one of the articles of the Charta de FcreJIa, 
 which the Barons afterwards obtained by force of arms. 
 fJullus de catero amittat <vitam, vel membra, pro lenaiisne 
 nojira. Ch. de Foreft. Art. io<
 
 OF ENGLAND. t$ 
 
 was of the greateft confequence, he arrogated 
 to himfelf the mod extenfive judicial power by 
 the eftablifhment of the Court which was called 
 Aula Regis y a formidable tribunal, which re- 
 ceived appeals from all tjie courts of the Ba- 
 rons, and decided in the laft refort on the eftates, 
 honour, and lives of the Barons themfelves; 
 and which, being wholly compofed of the great 
 officers of the Crown, removable at the King's 
 pleafure, and having the King himfelf for Pre- 
 sident, kept the fir ft Nobleman in the Kingdom 
 under the fame controul as the meansft fubject. 
 
 Thus, while the Kingdom of France, in 
 confequence of the flow and gradual formation 
 of the feudal government, found itfelf, in the 
 iffue, compofed of a number of parts fimply 
 placed by each other, and without any recipro- 
 cal adherence, the Kingdom of England on 
 the contrary, in confequence of the fudden and 
 violent introduction of the fame fyftem, became 
 a compound of parts united by the flrongeft 
 ties, and the regal Authority, by the preflure 
 of its immenfe weight, confolidated the whole 
 into one compact indiflbluble body. 
 
 To this difference in the original Conftitu- 
 tion of France and England, that is, in the 
 original power of their Kings, we are to attri- 
 3
 
 i6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 bute the difference, fo little analogous to 1(3 
 original caufe, of their prefent Constitutions* 
 This it is which furnifiies the folution of a pro- 
 blem which, I mnft confefs, for a long time 
 perplexed me, and explains the reafon why, 
 of two neighbouring Nations, Situated almoSt 
 under the fame climate, and having one com- 
 mon origin, the one has attained the fummit ot 
 liberty, the other has gradually funk under an 
 abfolute Monarchy. 
 
 In France, the royal Authority was indeed 
 inconfiderable; but this circumftar.ee was by no 
 means favourable to the general liberty. The 
 Lords were every thing; and the bulk of the 
 Nation were accounted nothing. All thofe wars 
 which were made on the King, had not liberty 
 lor their object; for of this the Chiefs al- 
 ready enjoyed but too great a mare: they were 
 the mere effedt of private ambition or caprice* 
 The People did not engage in them as aflb- 
 ciates in the fupport of a caufe common to all; 
 they were dragged, blindfold and like Haves, 
 to the Standard of their Leaders. In the mean 
 time, as the laws by virtue of which their Maf- 
 ters were considered as Vallals, had no relation to 
 thole by which they were themfclves bound as 
 Subjects, the refinance of which they were made
 
 OF ENGLAND, i> 
 
 the inftruments, never produced any advan- 
 tageous confequence in their favour, nor did it 
 eftablilh any principle of freedom that was in 
 any cafe applicable to them. 
 
 The inferior Nobles, who fhared in the inde- 
 pendence of the fuperior Nobility, added alfo 
 the effects of their own infolence to the defpot- 
 ifm of fo many Sovereigns; and the people, 
 wearied out by fufferings, and rendered defperate 
 by oppreffion, at times attempted to revolt. 
 But being parcelled out into fo many different 
 States, they could never perfectly agree, either 
 in the nature, or the times of their complaints. 
 The infurredtions, which ought to have been 
 general, were only fncceffive and particular. In 
 the mean time the Lords, ever uniting to avenge 
 their common canfe as Mailers, fell with irre- 
 liltible advantage on Men who were divided; 
 the People were thus feparately, and by force, 
 brought back to their former yoke; and Li- 
 berty, that precious offspring, which requires 
 fo many favourable circumilances to fofter it, 
 was every where flifled in its birth {a), 
 
 [a) It may be feen in Mezeray, how the Flemings, at 
 the time of the great revolt which was caufed, as he fays, 
 " by the inveterate hatred of the Nobles (les Gentils- 
 ** hornmes) againft the people of Ghent, 1 ' were crulhed 
 
 c
 
 i* THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 At length, when by conquefts, by efcheats, 
 or by Treaties, the feveral Provinces came to be 
 re-united (a) to the extenfive and continually in- 
 creafing dominions of the Monarch, they be- 
 came fubjed: to their new Mailer, already trained 
 
 by the union of almoft all the Nobility of France. 5><r 
 Mezeray, Reign of Charles VI. 
 
 (a) The word re-union exprefles in the French law, or 
 Hiftory, the reduction of a Province to an immediate de- 
 pendence on the Crown. The French lawyers, who 
 were at all times remarkably zealous for the aggrandife- 
 ment of the Crown (a zeal which would not have been 
 blameable, if it had been exerted only in the fuppreflion 
 of lawlefs Ariftocracy) always contended that when a 
 province once came into the poffeffion of the King, even 
 any private dominion of his before he acceded to the 
 Throne, it became re united for ever: the Ordonnance of 
 Moulins, in the year 1566, has fince given a thorough 
 fandtion to thefe Principles. The re-union of a province 
 might be cccafioned, firft, by the cafe juft mentioned, of 
 the accefhon of the pofTefTor of it to the throne: thus at 
 the acceffion of Henry IV. (the filler of the late King be- 
 ing excluded by the Salic law) Navarre and Beam were 
 re-united. Secondly, by the felony of the poffefibr, when 
 the King was able to force by dint of arms, the judg- 
 ment paffed by the Judges he had appointed: thus the 
 fmall Lordfhip of Rambouillet was feized upon by Hugh 
 Capet ; on which authors remark that it was the firft do- 
 minion that was re-unitcd: and the duchy of Normandy 
 was afterwards taken in the fame manner by Philip Au- 
 guftus from John King of England, condemned for the; 
 murder of Arthur Duke of Britanny, Thirdly, by the laft 
 will of the pofleilbr; Provence was re-united in this man-
 
 Of ENGLAND. 19 
 
 to obedience. The few privileges which the 
 Cities had been able to preferve, were little re- 
 flected by a Sovereign who had himfelf entered 
 into no engagement for that purpofe; and as the 
 re-unions were made at different times, the King 
 was always in a condition to overwhelm every 
 new Province that accrued to him, with the 
 weight of all thofe he already poffeffed. 
 
 ner, under the reign of Lewis XI. Fourthly, by inter- 
 marriages : this was the cafe of the county of Champagne, 
 under Philip the Fair; and of Britanny under Francis I. 
 Fifthly, by the failure of heirs of the blood, and fome- 
 times of heirs male: thus Burgundy was feized upon by 
 Lewis XL after the death of Charles the Bold, Duke of 
 that Province. Laftly, by purchafes : thus Philip of Va- 
 lois purchafed the Barony of Montpellier ; Henry IV. 
 the Marquifat of Salucesj Lewis XIII. the Principality of 
 Sedan, &e. 
 
 Thefe different Provinces> which with others united, 
 or re -unit id, after a like manner, now compofe the French 
 Monarchy, not only thus conferred on their refpective 
 Sovereigns different titles, but alfo differed from each 
 other with refped to the laws which they followed, and 
 Hill follow: the one are governed by the Roman law, 
 and are called Pays de Droit ecrit; the others follow par- 
 ticular cuftoms, which in procefs of time have been fet 
 down in writing, and are called Pays de Droit Coutumier. 
 In thofe Provinces the people had, at times, purchafed pri- 
 vileges from their Princes, which in the different Provinces 
 were alfo different, according to the wants and temper of 
 the Princes who granted them : 
 
 C 2
 
 2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 As a farther confequence of thefc differences 
 between the times of the re-unions, the feveral 
 parts of the Kingdom entertained no views of 
 affifling each other. When fome reclaimed 
 their privileges, the others, long fince reduced 
 to fubjedtion, had already forgotten their's. Be- 
 tides, thefe privileges, by reafon of the differ- 
 ences of the Governments under which the 
 Provinces had formerly been held, were alfo 
 almoft every where different: the circumftances 
 which happened in one place, thus bore little 
 affinity to thofe which fell out in another; the 
 fpirit of union was loft, or rather had never ex- 
 iffced : each Province, reftrained within its parti- 
 cular bounds, only ferved to infure the general 
 fubmiflionj and the fame caufes which had re- 
 duced that warlike, fpiritcd Nation, to a yoke of 
 fubjecaion, concurred alfo to keep them under it. 
 
 1 hus Liberty perifhed in France, becaufe it 
 wanted a favourable culture and proper fitua- 
 tion. Planted, if I may i'o exprefs myitlf, but 
 juft beneath the furface, it prclently expanded, 
 and fent forth fome larp-e fhoots; but having: 
 taken no root, it was loon plucked up. In 
 England, on the contrary, the feed lying at a 
 great depth, and being covered with an enor- 
 mous weight, feemed at firft to be fmothered;
 
 OF ENGLAND. 21 
 
 but it vegetated with the greater force; it im- 
 bibed a more rich and abundant nourifhmentj 
 its fap and juice became better aflimilated, and 
 it penetrated and filled up with its roots the 
 whole body of the foil. It was the excefiive 
 power of the King which made England free, 
 becanfe it was this very excefs that gave rife to 
 the fpirit of union, and of concerted remittance. 
 PoiTefTed of extenfive demefnes, the King found 
 himfelf independent; veiled with the moft 
 formidable prerogatives, he crufhed at pleafure 
 the moil powerful Barons in the Realm : it was 
 only by clofe and numerous confederacies 
 therefore, that thefe could refill his tyranny j 
 they even were compelled to affociate the Peo- 
 ple in them, and make them partners of public 
 Liberty. 
 
 Aflembled with their Vaffals in their great 
 Halls, where they difpenfed their hofpitality, 
 deprived of the amufements of more polifhed 
 Nations, naturally inclined, befides, freely to 
 expatiate on objects of which their hearts were 
 full, their converfation naturally turned on the 
 injutlice of the public impositions, on the ty- 
 ranny of the judicial proceedings, and, above 
 all, on the detefted foreft laws. 
 
 c 3
 
 22 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Deftitute of an opportunity of cavilling 
 about the meaning of laws the terms of which 
 were precife, or rather difdaining the refource 
 of fophiftry, they were naturally led to examine 
 into the firfl principles of Society; they en- 
 quired into the foundations of human authority^ 
 and became convinced, that Power, when its 
 object is not the good of thofe who are fubject 
 XQ it, is nothing more than the right of the 
 fjongeft, and may be reprelTed by the exertion 
 of a fimilar right. 
 
 The different orders of the feudal Govern- 
 ment, as eftablifhed in England, being con- 
 nected by tenures exactly fimilar^ the fame 
 maxims which were laid down as true againfl 
 the Lord paramount in behalf pf the Lord of 
 an upper fief, were likewife to be admitted 
 againft the latter, in behalf of the owner of an 
 inferior fief. The fame maxims were alfo to be 
 applied to the poffefTor of a ftill lower fief: they 
 farther defcended to the freeman, and to the 
 peafantj and the fpirit of liberty, after having 
 circulated through the different branches of the 
 feudal fubordination, thus continued to flow 
 through fucceflive homogeneous channels; it 
 forced a paffage to itfelf into the remoteft rami- 
 fications, and the principle of primeval equa- 
 
 8
 
 OF ENGLAND, 23 
 
 lity became every where diffufed and eftablilhed. 
 A facred principle, which neither injuftice nor 
 ambition can erafe; which exifts in every breaft, 
 and, to exert itfelf, requires only to be awaken- 
 ed among the numerous and opprefTed claries 
 of Mankind. 
 
 But when the Barons, whom their perfonal 
 confequence had at firft caufed to be treated 
 with caution and regard by the Sovereign, be- 
 gan to be no longer To, when the tyrannical laws 
 of the Conqueror became {till more tyrannically 
 executed, the confederacy, for which the gene- 
 ral opprefl]on had paved the way, inftantly took 
 place, The L,ord, the Vaflal, the inferior Vaf- 
 fal, all united, They even implored the afllft- 
 ance of the peafants and cottagers; and that 
 haughty averfion with which on the Continent 
 the Nobility repaid the induftrions hands which 
 fed them, was, in England, compelled to yield 
 to the prefTIng neceffity of fetting bounds to the 
 Royal authority. 
 
 The People, on the other hand, knew that 
 the caufe they were called upon to defend, 
 was a caufe common to all; and they were 
 fenfible, befides, that they were the necefTary 
 fupporters of it. Inftructed by the example 
 of their Leaders, they fpoke and ftipulatec^ 
 
 c 4
 
 24 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 conditions for themfelves: they infilled that, 
 for the future, every individual Ihould be inti- 
 tled to the protection of the law; and thus did 
 thofe rights with which the Lords had ftrength- 
 ened themfelves, in order to oppofe the tyranny 
 of the Crown, become a bulwark which was, in 
 time, to reftrain their own. 
 
 CHAP. II. 
 
 A fecond advantage England had over France : 
 - it formed one undivided State, 
 
 T was in the reign of Henry the Firft, about 
 forty years after the Conquer!:, that we 
 ict the above caufes begin to operate, This 
 Prince having afcended the throne to the ex- 
 clufion of his elder brother, was fenfible that he 
 had no other means to maintain his power than 
 by gaining the affection of his fubjects ; but, at 
 the fame time, he perceived that it muft be 
 the affection of the whole nation: he, therefore* 
 not only mitigated the rigour of the feudal laws 
 in favour of the Lords, but alfo annexed as a 
 condicion to the Charter he granted, that the 
 Loids ihould allow the fame freedom to their 
 r^fpe&ive Vafials* Care was even taken to,
 
 O F E N G L A N D, 25 
 
 abolifh thofe laws of the Conqueror which lay 
 heavielt on the lower claries of the People (a). 
 
 Under Henry the Second, liberty took a 
 farther ftride; and the ancient 'Trial by Jury, 
 a mode of procedure which is at prefent one 
 of the moft valuable parts of the Englifh 
 law, made again, though imperfectly, its ap- 
 pearance. 
 
 But thefe caufes, which had worked but 
 filently and {lowly under the two Henrys, who 
 were Princes in fome degree juil, and of 
 great capacity, manifested themfelves, at once, 
 under the defpotic reign of King John. The 
 royal prerogative, and the foreft laws, having 
 been exerted by this Prince to a degree of ex- 
 fa) Amongld others, the law of the Curfeu. It might 
 be matter 01 curious difcuffion to inquire what the Anglo- 
 Saxon Government would in procefs of time have become, 
 and of courfe the Government of England be, at this pre- 
 fent time, if the event of the Conquer! had never taken 
 place ; which, by conferring an immense as well as unufual 
 power on the head or the feudal Syftem, compelled the 
 Nobility to contract a lading and fincere union with the 
 People. It is very probable that the Englifh Government 
 y/ould at this day be the fame as that which long prevailed 
 in Scotland, where the King and Nobles engroiTed, jointly, 
 or by turns, the whole power in the State, the fame as in 
 Sweden, the fame as in Denmark, Countries whence the 
 Anglo-Saxons came,
 
 s THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ceffive feverity, he foon beheld a general con- 
 federacy formed againfl him : and here we muft 
 obferve another circumftance, highly advan- 
 tageous, as well as peculiar to England. 
 
 England was not, like France, an aggre- 
 gation of a number of different Sovereignties: 
 it formed but one State, and acknowledged 
 but one Mailer, one general title. The fame 
 laws, the fame kind of dependence, confe- 
 quently the fame notions, the fame interefts, 
 prevailed throughout the whole, The extre- 
 mities of the kingdom could, at all times, 
 unite to give a check to the exertions of an 
 unjuft power. From the river Tweed to Portf- 
 mouth, from Yarmouth to the Land's End, all 
 was in motion: the agitation increaied from 
 the diftance like the rolling waves of an exten- 
 five fea; and the Monarch left to himfelf, 
 and deftitute of refources, faw himfelf at- 
 tacked on all fides by an univerfal combination 
 of his fubjects. 
 
 No fooner was the ftandard fet up againft 
 John, than his very Courtiers forfook him. 
 In this fituation, finding no part of his king- 
 dom iefs irritated againft him than another, 
 having no detached province which he could 
 engage in his defence by promifes of pardon,
 
 OF ENGLAND. a; 
 
 or of peculiar conceffions, the trivial though 
 never-failing refources of Government, he was 
 compelled with feven of his attendants, all that 
 remained with him, to fubmit himfelf to the 
 difpofal of his fubje&s; and he figned at Run- 
 ing Mead (#) the Charter of the Foreft, toge- 
 ther with that famous charter, which, from its 
 fuperior and extenfive importance, is denomU 
 nated Magna Charta. 
 
 By the former the mod tyrannical part of 
 the foreft laws was abolifhed ; and by the lat- 
 ter, the rigour of the feudal laws was greatly- 
 mitigated in favour of the Lords. But this 
 Charter did not flop there; conditions were 
 alfo ftipulated in favour of the numerous body 
 of the people who had concurred to obtain it, 
 and who claimed, with fword in hand, a fhare 
 in that fecurity it was meant to eftablifh. It 
 was hence instituted by the Great Charter, that 
 the fame fervices which were remitted in favour 
 of the Barons, fhould be in like manner remitted 
 in favour of their VafTals. This Charter more- 
 over eftablifhed an equality of weights and 
 meafures throughout England ; it exempted the 
 jMerchants from arbitrary impofts, and gave 
 
 (#) Anno 1 21 5.
 
 sS THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 them liberty to enter and depart the Kingdom 
 at pleafure : it even extended to the loweit or- 
 ders of the State, fince it enacted, that the Vil- 
 lain, or Bondman, fhould not be fubject to the 
 forfeiture of his implements of tillage. Laftly, 
 by the twenty-ninth article of the fame Char- 
 ter, it was enacted, that no fubjedt mould be 
 exiled, or in any fhape whatever molefted, 
 either in his perfon or effects, otherwife rhia 
 by judgment of his peers, and according to ihe 
 law of the land (a) : an article lb impoi tar.t, 
 that it jnay be faid to comprehend the whole 
 end and delign of political focieties; and from 
 that moment the Englifh would have been a 
 free People, if there were not an immenfe 
 diftance between the making of laws, and the 
 obferving of them. 
 
 But though this Charter wanted moft of 
 thofe fupports which were necefiary to infure 
 refpeCt to it, though it did not fecure to the 
 
 (a) " Nullus liber homo capiatur, vel imprifonetur, vel 
 i difTefietur de libero tenemento fuo, vel libertatibus, vel 
 " liberis confuetudinibus fuis ; aut utlagetur, aut exulecur, 
 " aut aliquo modo deftruatizr; nee fupt-r eum ibimus, nee 
 * fuper eum mittemus, nili per legale judicium parium 
 *< fuorum, vel per legem terra;. Nulli vendemus, nulli 
 negabimus, aut differernus, juftitiam vel rectum." Magna 
 Chart, cap. xxix,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 29 
 
 poor and friendlefs any certain and legal me- 
 thods of obtaining the execution of it (pro- 
 vifions which numberlefs tranfgreffions alone 
 could, in procefs of time point out), yet it 
 was a prodigious advance towards the efta- 
 bliihment of public liberty. Inflead of the 
 general maxims refpecting the rights of the 
 People and the duties of the Prince (maxims 
 againft which ambition perpetually contends, 
 and which it fometimes even openly and abfo- 
 lutely denies), here was fubftituted a written 
 law, that is, a truth admitted by all parties, 
 which no longer required the fupport of argu- 
 ment. The rights and privileges of the indi- 
 vidual, as well in his perfon as in his property, 
 became fettled axioms. The Great Charter, at 
 firft enacted with fo much folemnity, and after- 
 wards confirmed at the beginning of every fuc- 
 ceeding reign, became like a general banner 
 perpetually let up for the union of all clafTes 
 of the people; and the foundation was laid on 
 which thole equitable laws were to rife, which 
 offer the fame afiiftance to the poor and weak, 
 as to the rich and powerful (#). 
 
 (a) The reader, to be more fully convinced of the 
 reality of the caufes to which the liberty of England has 
 been here afcribed, as well as to the truth of the obfer-
 
 5<s THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Under the long reign of Henry the Thirds 
 the differences which arofe between the King 
 and the Nobles, rendered England a fcene of 
 confufion. Amidft the viciflitudes which the 
 fortune of war produced in their mutual con- 
 flicts, the People became flill more and more 
 ferifible of their importance, and fo did in con- 
 fequence both the Kirig and the Barons alfa. 
 Alternately courted by both parties, they ob- 
 tained a confirmation of the Great Charter, and 
 even the addition of new privileges, by the 
 ftatutes of Merton and of Marlebridge. But I 
 
 vations made at the fame time on the fituation of the peo- 
 ple of France, needs only to compare the Great Charter, 
 fo extenfive in its provilions, and in which the Baron* 
 ftipulated in favour even of the Bondman, with the treaty 
 concluded between Lewis the Eleventh and feveral of the 
 Princes and Peers of France, intitled, A Treaty made at 
 St. Maur, between the Dukes of Normandy, Calabre, Bre~ 
 tagne, Bourbonnois, Awvergne, Nemours; the Counts of Cbaro* 
 lois, Armagnac, and St. Pol, and other Princes of France, 
 rifen up in fupport of the public good, of the one part ; and 
 King Lewis the Eleventh of the other, Oftober 29, 1 465. 
 In this Treaty, which was made in order to terminate a 
 war that was called the war for the Public good (pro bono 
 Publico), no provifion was made but concerning the parti- 
 cular power of a few Lords : not a word was inferted in 
 favour of the people. This treaty may be feen at large 
 in the pieces jujlifcatives annexed to the Mimoires de Phi- 
 lippe de Comines.
 
 OFENGLAND. 3s 
 
 haften to reach the grand epoch of the reign of 
 Edward the Firft; a Prince, who, from his 
 numerous and prudent laws, has been denomi- 
 nated the Englim Juftinian. 
 
 PofTeffed of great natural talents, and fuc- 
 ceeding a Prince whofe weaknefs and injuflice 
 had rendered his reign unhappy, Edward was 
 fenfible that nothing but a flricl: adminiftration 
 of juflice, could, on the one fide, curb a Nobi- 
 lity whom the troubles of the preceding reign 
 had rendered turbulent, and on the other, ap- 
 peafe and conciliate the people, by fecuring the 
 property of individuals. To this end, he made 
 jurifprudence the principal objecl: of his atten- 
 tion; and fo much did it improve under his 
 care, that the mode of procefs became fixed 
 and fettled; Judge Hale going even fo far as 
 to affirm, that the Englim laws arrived at once, 
 6?" quafi per faltum, at perfection, and that there 
 has been more improvement made in them dur- 
 ing the firfi thirteen years of the reign of Ed- 
 ward, than all the ages fince his time have done. 
 
 But what renders this asra particularly inre- 
 refting, is, that it affords the firft inftance of 
 the admimon of the Deputies of Towns and 
 boroughs into (a) Parliament. 
 
 (#) I mean their legal origin; for the E31I of Lei-
 
 32 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 -* Edward, continually engaged in wars, either' 
 againft Scotland or on the Continent, feeing 
 moreover his demefnes considerably diminifhed, 
 was frequently reduced to the moft preffing ne- 
 ceflities. But though, in confequence of the 
 fpirit of the times, he frequently indulged him- 
 felf in particular acts of injuftice, yet he per- 
 ceived that it was impoffible to extend a general 
 oppreflion over a body of Nobles., and a People, 
 who fo well knew how to unite in a common 
 caufe. In order to raife fubfidies, therefore, he 
 was obliged to employ a new method, and to 
 endeavour to obtain through the confent of the 
 People, what his Predecehors had hitherto ex- 
 pected from their own power. The fheriffs were 
 ordered to invite the Towns and Boroughs of 
 the different Counties to fend Deputies to Par- 
 liament; and it is from this a?ra that we 
 are to date the origin of the Houfe of Com- 
 mons (//). 
 
 It rnuil be confeffed, however, that thefe 
 Deputies of the People were not, at firlt, 
 pofTeffed of any confiderable authority* They 
 
 ccftcr, who had ufurped the power during part of the 
 preceding reign, had called fiich Deputies up to Parlia- 
 ment before. 
 () Anno 1295. 
 I
 
 OF ENGLAND. 33 
 
 were far from enjoying thofe extenfive privileges 
 which, in thefe days, conftitute the Houfe of 
 Commons a collateral part of the Government: 
 they were in thofe times called up only to pro- 
 vide for the wants of the King, and approve 
 of the refolutions taken by him and the afTem- 
 bly of the Lords (a). But it was neverthelefs 
 a great point gained, to have obtained the 
 right of uttering their complaints, affembled 
 in a body and in a legal way to have acquired, 
 inftead of the dangerous refource of infurrec- 
 tions, a lawful and regular mean of influencing 
 the motions of the Government, and thenceforth 
 to have become a part of it. Whatever difad- 
 vantage might attend the ftation at firft allotted 
 to the Reprefentatives of the People, it was foon 
 to be compenfated by the preponderance the 
 
 {a) The end mentioned in the Summons fent to the 
 Lords, was a'e arduis negotiis regni traclaturi, & confiliurn 
 impenfuri: the Summons fent to the Commons was, ad 
 facienJujn & confentiendum. The power enjoyed by the 
 latter was even inferior to what they might have expefred 
 from the Summons fent to them : " In irioft of the 
 " ancient Statutes they are not fo much as named ; and 
 " in feveral, even when they are mentioned, they are 
 *' diftinguiihed as petitioners merely, the Affent of the 
 * Lords being exprefled in contradutinftion to the Requeft 
 " of the Commons.'" See on this fubjeft the Preface to 
 the Collection of the Statutes at large, by P.ufFhead, and 
 the authorities quoted therein, 
 
 D
 
 34 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 People neceflarily acquire, when they are en- 
 abled to acl: and move with method, and efpe- 
 cially with concert (a). 
 
 And indeed this privilege of naming Re- 
 prefentatives, infignificant as it might then ap- 
 pear, prefently manifefled itfelf by the moft 
 confiderable effects. In fpite of his reluctance, 
 and after many evafions unworthy of fo great 
 a King, Edward was obliged to confirm the 
 Great Charter; he even confirmed it eleven 
 times in the courfe of his reign. It was more- 
 over enacted, that whatever mould be done con- 
 trary to it, Ihould be null and void; that it 
 Ihould be read twice a year in all Cathedrals; 
 and that the penalty of excommunication mould 
 be denounced againft any one who ihould pre- 
 fume to violate it (). 
 
 (a) France had indeed alfo her aflemblies of the 
 General Eftates of the Kingdom, in the fame manner as 
 England had her Parliament; but then it was only the 
 Deputies of the Towns within the particular domain of 
 the Crown, that is, for a very fmall part of the Nation 
 who, under the name of the Third Eftate, were admitted 
 in thofe Eftates ; and it is eafy to conceive that they ac- 
 quired no great influence in an aftembly of Sovereigns who 
 gave the law to their Lord Paramount. Hence, when 
 thefe difappeared, the maxim became immediately efta- 
 blifhed, The nuill of the King is the will of the Law. In 
 old French, Qui veut le Roy, Ji went la Lay. 
 
 (b) ConhVmationes Chartarum, cap. 2, 3, 4,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 35 
 
 At length he converted into an eftablifhed 
 law a privilege of which the Englifh had hi- 
 therto had only a precarious enjoyment; and, 
 in the ftatute de Tallagio non concedendo, he de- 
 creed, that no tax fhould be laid, nor import 
 levied, without the joint confent of the Lords 
 and Commons (a). A moll: important Statute 
 this, which, in conjunction with Magna Charta, 
 forms the bafis of the Englifh Conftitution. If 
 from the latter the Englifh are to date the origin 
 of their liberty, from the former they are to 
 date the eftablifhment of it; and as the Great 
 Charter was the bulwark that protected the 
 freedom of individuals, fo was the Statute in 
 queftion the engine which protected the Charter 
 itfelf, and by the help of which the People 
 were thenceforth to make legal conquefts over 
 the authority of the Crown. 
 
 This is the period at which we muft flop, 
 in order to take a diftant view, and contemplate 
 the different profpecl: which the reft of Europe 
 then prefented. 
 
 (a) " Nullum tallagium vel auxllium, per nos, vel 
 " haeredes noftros, in regno noftro ponatur feu levetur, 
 11 fine voluntate Sc affenfu Archiepifcoporum, Epifcoporum, 
 " Comitum, Baronum, Militum, Burgenfium, & aliorum 
 " liberoruro bom 1 de regno noftro." Stat. an. 24 Ed. I. 
 
 D2
 
 36 THE CONSTITUTION" 
 
 The efficient caufes of flavery were daily 
 operating and gaining ftrength. The indepen- 
 dence of the Nobles on the one hand, the igno- 
 rance and weaknefs of the people on the other, 
 continued to be extreme : the feudal govern- 
 ment Hill continued to diffufe oppreffion and 
 mifery; and fuch was the confufion of it, that 
 it even took away all hopes of amendment. 
 
 France, Hill bleeding from the extravagance 
 of a Nobility inceflantly engaged in groundlefs 
 wars, either with each other, or with the King, 
 was again defolated by the tyranny of that fame 
 Nobility, haughtily jealous of their liberty, or 
 rather of their anarchy (a). The people, op- 
 preiTed by thofe who ought to have guided and 
 protected them, loaded with infults by thofe 
 who exifted by their labour, revolted on all fides. 
 But their tumultuous infurreclions had fcarcely 
 any other object than that of giving vent to 
 
 (a) Net contented with oppreffion, they added infult. 
 " When the Gentility/'' fays Mezeray, " pillaged and 
 " committed exactions on the peafantry, they called the 
 " poor fufierer, in derifion Jaques bc?ibomtne (Goodman 
 " James.) This gave rife to a furious fedition, which 
 " was called xhejaquerie. It began at Beauvais in the year 
 " 1357a extending itfelf into mo it of the Provinces of 
 *' France, and was not appeafed but by the deftruclion of 
 " part of thofe unhappy victims, thoufands of whom were 
 " flaughtercd."
 
 GF ENGLAND. 37 
 
 the anguiih with which their hearts were full. 
 They had no thoughts of entering into a gene- 
 ral combination; ftill lefs of changing the form 
 of the Government, and laying a regular plan 
 of public liberty. 
 
 Having never extended their views beyond 
 the fields they cultivated, they had no concep- 
 tion of thofe different ranks and orders of Men, 
 of thofe diftindr. and oppofite privileges and 
 prerogatives, which are all necefTary ingredients 
 of a free Conflitution. Hitherto confined to 
 the fame round of ruftic employments, they 
 little thought of that complicated fabiic, which 
 the more informed themielves cannot but with 
 difficulty comprehend, when, by a concurreace 
 of iayouiable circumstances, the flrud:ure has 
 at length been reared, and ftands difplayed to 
 their view. 
 
 In their fimplicity they faw no other remedy 
 for the national evils than the general eitablilh- 
 ment of the Regal power, that is, of the autho- 
 rity of one common uncontrouled mailer, and 
 only longed for that time, which, while it gra- 
 tified their revenge, would mitigate their fuffcr^ 
 ings, and reduce to the fame level both the op- 
 preffors and the oppreffed. 
 
 The Nobility, on the other hand, bent folcly 
 on the enjoyment of a momentary indepencW 
 
 'd 3
 
 5 3 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 cnce, irrecoverably loft the affection of the 
 only Men who might in time fupport them ; 
 and, equally regardlefs of the dictates of hu- 
 manity and of prudence, they did not perceive 
 the gradual and continual advances of the royal 
 authority, which was foon to overwhelm them 
 all. Already were Normandy, Anjou, Langue- 
 doc, and Touraine, re-united to the Crown; 
 Dauphiny, Champagne, and part of Guienne, 
 were foon to follow: France was doomed at 
 length to fee the reign of Lewis the Eleventh ; 
 to fee her General Eftates firft become ufelefs, 
 and be afterwards abolifhed. 
 
 It was the defriny of Spain alfo to behold 
 her feveral Kingdoms united under one Head; 
 ihe was fated to be in time ruled by Ferdi- 
 nand and Charles the Fifth (a). And Ger- 
 
 {a) Spain was originally divided into twelve Kingdoms, 
 befides Principalities, which by Treaties, and efpecially 
 by Conquefts, were collected into three Kingdoms; 
 thofe of Caftile, Aragon, and Granada. Ferdinand the 
 fifth, King of Aragon, married Ifabella, Queen of Caf- 
 tile; they made a joint Conqueft of the Kingdom of Gra- 
 nada, and thefe three Kingdoms, thus united, defcended, 
 in 1 516, to their grandfon Charles V. and formed the 
 Spanifh Monarchy. At this aera, the Kings of Spain be- 
 gan to be abfolute; and the States of the Kingdoms of 
 Caftile and Leon, " aflembled at Toledo, in the month 
 ' of November, 1539, were the laft in which the three 
 " orders met, that is, the Grandees, the Ecclefiaitics,
 
 OFENGLAND. 39 
 
 many, where an elective Crown prevented the 
 re-unions (a), was indeed to acquire a few free 
 Cities; but her people, parcelled into fo many 
 different dominions, were deftined to remain 
 fubjec~t to the arbitrary yoke of fuch of her 
 different Sovereigns as mould be able to main- 
 tain their power and independence. In a word, 
 the feudal tyranny which overfpread the Con- 
 tinent, did not compenfate, by any preparation 
 of diftant advantages, the prefent calamities it 
 caufed; nor was it to leave behind it, as it 
 difappeared, any thing but a more regular kind 
 of Defpotifm. 
 
 " and the Deputies of the Towns. 1 ' See Ferrera's General 
 Hijiory of Spain. 
 
 {a) The Kingdom of France, as it flood under Hugh 
 Capet and his next Succeflbrs, may, with a great degree 
 of exaclnefs, be compared with the German Empire as 
 it exifls at prefent, and alfo exifted at that time: but the 
 Imperial Crown of Germany having, through a conjunc- 
 tion of circumftances, continued elective, the German 
 Emperors, though veiled with more high-founding pre- 
 rogatives than even the Kings of France, laboured under 
 very effential difadvantages : they could not purfue a plan 
 of aggrandifement with the fame lleadinefs as a line of 
 hereditary Sovereigns ufually do; and the right to elect 
 them, enjoyed by the greater Princes of Germany, pro- 
 cured a fufficicnt power to thefe, to protect themfelves, 
 as well as the leffer Lords, againft the power of the 
 Crown. 
 
 d 4
 
 40 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But in England, the fame feudal fyftem, after 
 having fuddenly broken in like a flood, had de^ 
 pofited, and flill continue to depofit, the noble 
 feeds of the fpirit of liberty, union, and fober 
 refinance. So early as the times of Edward, 
 the tide was feen gradually to fubfide ; the laws 
 which protect the perfon and property of the 
 individual, began to make their appearance; 
 that admirable Conftitution, the refult of a 
 threefold power, infeniibly arofe (a) ; and the. 
 eye might even then difcover the verdant fum- 
 mits of that fortunate region that was deflined 
 to be the feat of Philofophy and Liberty, 
 which are infeparable companions. 
 
 (<*.) " Now, in my opinion," fays Philipe de Comines, 
 in times not much pofterior to thofe of Edward the Firft, 
 and with the fimplicity of the language of his times., 
 ft among all the fovereignties I know in the world, that 
 " in which the public good is beft attended to, and the 
 *' leaft violence exercifed on the people, is that of Eng- 
 land," Memoires de Comines, torn. I. lib. v. chap. xix.
 
 OF ENGLAND, 4* 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 The SubjeB continued. 
 
 THE Reprefentatives of the Nation, an$ 
 of the whole Nation, were now admitted 
 into Parliament: the great point therefore was 
 gained, that was one day to procure them the 
 great influence which they at prefent pofTefs; 
 and the fubfequent reigns afford continual in- 
 stances of its fucceffive growth. 
 
 Under Edward the Second, the Commons be- 
 gan to annex petitions to the bills by which they 
 granted fubiidies: this was the dawn of their 
 legiflative authority. Under Edward the Third, 
 they declared they would not, in future, ac- 
 knowlege any law to which they had not ex- 
 prefsly affented. Soon after this, they exerted 
 a privilege in which confifts, at this time, one 
 of the great balances of the Conftitution : they 
 impeached, and procured to be condemned, 
 fome of the firft Minifters of State, Under 
 Henry the Fourth, they refufed to grant fub- 
 iidies before an anfwer had been given to their 
 petitions. In a word, every event of any con- 
 feo^uence was attended with an increafe of the 
 power of the Commons ; increafes indeed by&
 
 42 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 flow and gradual, but which were peaceably 
 and legally effected, and were the more fit to 
 engage the attention of the People, and coalefce 
 with the ancient principles of the Conftitution. 
 
 Under Henry the Fifth, the Nation was en- 
 tirely taken up with its wars againfl France; 
 and in the reign of Henry the Sixth began the 
 fatal contefts between the houfes of York and 
 Lancafter. The noife of arms alone was now 
 to be heard : during the filence of the laws 
 already in being, no thought was had of enact- 
 ing new ones; and for thirty years together, 
 England prefents a wide fcene of daughter and 
 defolation. 
 
 At length, under Henry the Seventh, who, 
 by his intermarriage with the houfe of York, 
 united the pretentions of the two families, a 
 general peace was re-eftablifhed, and the pro- 
 fpect of happier days feemed to open on the 
 Nation. But the long and violent agitation 
 under which it had laboured, was to be fol- 
 lowed by along and painful recovery. Henry, 
 mounting the throne with fword in hand, and 
 in great meafure as a Conqueror, had promifes 
 to fulfil, as well as injuries to avenge. In the 
 mean time, the People, wearied out by the ca- 
 lamities they had undergone, and longing only
 
 OFENGLAND. 43 
 
 for repofe, abhorred even the idea of refinance; 
 fo that the remains of an almoft exterminated 
 Nobility beheld themfelves left defence- 
 lefs, and abandoned to the mercy of the So- 
 vereign. 
 
 The Commons, on the other hand, accuf- 
 tomed to act only a fecond part in public af- 
 fairs, and finding themfelves bereft of thofe 
 who had hitherto been their Leaders, were more 
 than ever afraid to form, of themfelves, an 
 oppofition. Placed immediately, as well as the 
 Lords, under the eye of the King, they beheld 
 themfelves expofed to the fame dangers. Like 
 them, therefore, they purchafed their perfonal 
 fecurity at the expence of public liberty; and 
 in reading the hiftory of the two firft Kings of 
 the houfe of Tudor, we imagine ourfelvcs read- 
 ing the relation given by Tacitus, of Tiberius 
 and the Roman Senate (;/). 
 
 The time, therefore, feemed to be arrived, 
 at which England mull fubmit, in its turn, to 
 the fate of the other Nations of Europe. All 
 thofe barriers which it had railed for the de- 
 fence of its liberty, feemed to have only been 
 able to poftpone the inevitable effedts of Power. 
 
 [a) Shtanto qui: illujlricr, tatifo magis faljl ac fejli- 
 nantcs.
 
 44 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But the remembrance of their ancient laws, 
 of that great charter fo often and fo folemnly 
 confirmed, was too deeply imprefled on the 
 minds of the Englifh, to be effaced by tran- 
 iitory evils. Like a deep and extenfive ocean, 
 which preferves an equability of temperature 
 amidft all the viciflitudes of feafons, England 
 iVill retained thofe principles of liberty which 
 were fo univerfally diffufed through all orders 
 of the People, and they required only a proper 
 opportunity to manifeft themfejves. 
 
 England, befides, Hill continued to porfefs 
 the immenfe advantage of being one undivided 
 $tate. 
 
 Had it been, like France, divided into fe- 
 veral diftintft dominions, it would alfo have 
 had feveral National Affemblies. Thefe Af- 
 femblies, being convened at different times and 
 places, for this and other reafons, never could 
 have ated in concert; and the power of with- 
 holding fubfidies, a power lb important when 
 it is that of difabling the Sovereign and bind- 
 ing him down to inaction, would then have 
 only been the definitive privilege of irritating 
 a Mafter who would have eafily found means to 
 pbtain fupplies from other quarters. 
 
 The different Parliaments or Affemblies of 
 thefe feveral States, having thenceforth no
 
 OF ENGLAND; 45 
 
 means of recommending themfelves to their 
 Sovereign but their forwardnefs in complying 
 with his demands, would have vied with each 
 other in granting what it would not only have 
 been fruitlefs, but even highly dangerous, to 
 refufe. The King would not have failed foorv 
 to demand, as a tribute, a gift he muft have 
 been confident to obtain ; and the outward 
 form of confent would have been left to the 
 People only as an additional means of opprefT- 
 ing them without danger. 
 
 But the King of England continued, even 
 ill the time of the Tudors, to have but one 
 AfTembly before which he could lay his wants, 
 and apply for relief. How great foever the 
 incteafe of his power was, a fingle Parliament 
 alone could furnifh him with the means of 
 exercifing it; and whether it was that the 
 members of this Parliament entertained a deep 
 fenfe of their advantages, or whether private 
 intereft exerted itfelf in aid of patriotifm, they 
 at all times vindicated the right of granting, or 
 rather refufing fubfidies; and, amidft the ge- 
 neral wreck of every thing they ought to have 
 held dear, they at lead clung obuinately to the 
 plank which was deftined to prove the inftru- 
 ment of their prefervation. 
 3
 
 46 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Under Edward the Sixth, the abfurd tyran- 
 nical laws againfl High Treafon, inftituted un- 
 der Henry the Eighth, his predeceffor, were 
 abolifhed. But this young and virtuous Prince 
 having foon patted away, the blood-thirfty 
 Mary aftoniihed the world with cruelties, which 
 nothing but the fanaticifm of a part of her 
 fubjects could have enabled her to execute. 
 
 Under the long and brilliant reign of Eliza- 
 beth, England began to breathe anew; and the 
 Proteftant religion, being feated once more on 
 the throne, brought with it fome more freedom 
 and toleration. 
 
 The Star-Chamber, that effectual inftru- 
 ment of the tyranny of the two Henries, yet 
 continued to fubfift; the inquifitorial tribunal 
 of the High Commiffion was even inftituted ; 
 and the yoke of arbitrary power lay ftill 
 heavy on the fubje<ft. But the general affec- 
 tion of the people for a Queen whofe former 
 misfortunes had created fuch a general con- 
 cern, the imminent dangers which England 
 efcaped, and the extreme glory attending that 
 reisn, leiTened the fenfe of fuch exertions of 
 authority as would, in thefe days, appear the 
 height of Tyranny, and ferved at that time to 
 juflify, as they ftill do excufe, a Princess
 
 OF ENGLAND, 47 
 
 whofe great talents, though not her prin- 
 ciples of government, render her worthy 
 of being ranked among the greateft Sove- 
 reigns. 
 
 Under the reign of the Stuarts, the Nation 
 began to recover from its long lethargy. James 
 the Firft, a prince rather imprudent than ty- 
 rannical, drew back the veil which had hi- 
 therto difguifed fo many ufurpations, and made 
 an oftentatious difplay of what his predeceffors 
 had been contented to enjoy. 
 
 He was incefTantly alTerting, that the au- 
 thority of Kings was not to be controuled, 
 any more than that of God himfelf. Like 
 Him, they were omnipotent; and thofe privi- 
 leges to which the people fo clamorouily laid 
 claim, as their inheritance and birthright, were 
 no more than an effecl: of the grace and tole- 
 ration of his royal anceflors (a). 
 
 Thofe principles, hitherto only filently a- 
 dopted in the Cabinet, and in the Courts of 
 Juftice, had maintained their ground in con- 
 fequence of this very obfcurity. Being now 
 announced from the Throne, and refounded 
 
 {a) See his Declaration made in Parliament, in the 
 years 1610 and 1621. 
 Z
 
 4 8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 from the pulpit, they fpread an univerfal alarm* 
 Commerce, befides, with its attendant arts, 
 and above all that of printing, diffufed more 
 falutary notions throughout all orders of the 
 people; a new light began to rife upon the 
 Nation; and the fpirit of oppofition frequently 
 diiplayed itfelf in this reign, to which the 
 Englifh Monarchs had not, for a long time 
 pad, been accuftomed. 
 
 But the florm, which was only gathering in 
 clouds during the reign of James, began to 
 mutter under Charles the Firft, his fuccefibr; 
 and the fcene which opened to view, on the 
 acceflion of that Prince, prefcnted the moft 
 formidable afpec/t. 
 
 The notions of religion, by a fingular con- 
 currence, united with the love of liberty : the 
 fame fpirit which had made an attack on the 
 eftablifhed faith, now directed itfelf to politics: 
 the royal prerogatives were brought under the 
 fame examination as the doctrines of the 
 Church of Rome had been fubmitted to; and 
 as a fuperflitious religion had proved unable 
 to fupport the tefl, lb neither couid an au- 
 thority pretended unlimited, be expected to 
 bear it. 
 
 The Commons, on the other hand, were 
 recovering from the aftonifhment into which
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 49 
 
 the extinction of the power of the Nobles had, 
 at fir ft, thrown them. Taking a view of the 
 (late of the Nation, and of their own, they 
 became fenfible of their whole flrength ; they 
 determined to make ufe of it, and to reprefs 
 a power which feemed, for fo long a time, to 
 have levelled every barrier. Finding among 
 themfelves Men of the greateft capacity, they 
 undertook that important tafk with method 
 and by conftitutional means ; and thus had 
 Charles to cope with a whole Nation put in 
 motion and directed by an affembly of Statef- 
 men. 
 
 And here we mull: obferve how different 
 were the effects produced in England, by the 
 annihilation of the power of the Nobility, 
 from thofe which the fame event had produced 
 in France. 
 
 In France, where, in confequence of the 
 divifion of the People and of the exorbitant 
 power of the Nobles, the People were account- 
 ed nothing, when the Nobles themfelves were 
 fuppreffed, the work was completed. 
 
 In England, on the contrary, where the 
 Nobles ever vindicated the rights of the 
 People equally with their own, in England, 
 where the People had fuccefiively acquired 
 
 E
 
 $o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 moll effectual means of influencing the mo- 
 tions of the Government, and above all were 
 undivided, when the Nobles thcmfelves were 
 call to the ground, the body of the People 
 flood firm, and maintained the public li- 
 berty. 
 
 The unfortunate Charles, however, was to- 
 tally ignorant of the dangers which furrounded 
 him. Seduced by the example of the other 
 Sovereigns of Europe, he was not aware how 
 different in reality, his fituation was from 
 theirs : he had the imprudence to exert with 
 rigour an authority which he had no ultimate 
 refources to fuppcrt: an union was at lafi ef- 
 fected in the Nation; and he law his ener- 
 vated prerogatives diflipated with a breath (a). 
 By the famous a<*l, called the Petition of 
 
 (a) It might here be objected, that when, under 
 Charles the Firft, the regal power was obliged to fub- 
 mit to the power of the People, the king poflefled 
 other dominions bcfides England, viz. Scotland and 
 Ireland, and therefore feemed to enjoy the fame ad- 
 vantage as the Kings of France, that of reigning over 
 2. divided Empire or Nation. But, to this it is to be 
 anfwered, that, at the time we mention, Ireland, fcarcely 
 civilized, only increafed the necrflities, and confequently 
 the deperdan.ee, of the King: while Scotland, through
 
 OFENGLAND. 5* 
 
 Right, and another poflerior Act, to both 
 which he aflented, the compulfory loans and 
 taxes, difguifed under the name of Benevolences, 
 were delared to be contrary to law; arbitrary 
 imprisonments., and the exercife of the martial 
 law, were aboiifhed ; the Court of High Com- 
 miffion, and the Star-Chamber, were fup- 
 prefled (V); and the Conftitution, freed from 
 the apparatus of defpotic powers with which 
 
 the conjunction of peculiar circumftance?, had thrown 
 
 oft* her obedience. And though thofe two States, even 
 at prefent, bear no proportion to the compact body of 
 the Kingdom of England, and feem never to have beer! 
 able, by "their union with it, to procure to the King any 
 dangerous refources, yet, the circamftances which took 
 place in both at the time of the Revolution, or fince, 
 (ufRciencly prove that it was no unfavourable circumllance 
 to Englifh liberty, that the great crins of the reign of 
 Charles the Fiift, and the great advance which the Con- 
 stitution was to make at that time, mould precede the 
 period at which the King of England might have been 
 able to call in the affiilance of two other Kingdoms. 
 
 {a) The Star-Chamber differed from all the other 
 Courts of Law in this : the latter were governed only 
 by the common law, or immemorial cuftom, and Acts of 
 Parliament j whereas the former often admitted for law 
 the proclamations of the King in Council, and grounded 
 its judgments upon them. The abolition of this Tribunal, 
 therefore, was jultly looked upon as a great victory over 
 regal Authoritv, 
 
 2
 
 52 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the Tudors had obfcured it, was reftored to 
 its ancient luftre. Happy had been the People 
 if their Leaders, after having executed fo noble 
 a work, had contented themfelves with the 
 glory of being the benefactors of their Country. 
 Happy had been the King, if, obliged at laft 
 to fubmit, his fubmiflion had been fincere, and 
 if he had become fufnciently fenfible, that the 
 only refource he had left was the affection of 
 his fubjedts. 
 
 But Charles knew not how to furvive the 
 lofs of a power he had conceived to be in- 
 difputable: he could not reconcile himfelf to 
 limitations and reftraints fo injurious, accord- 
 ing to his notions, to fovereign authority. His 
 diicourfe and conduct betrayed his fecret de- 
 figns; diflruft took poffeflion of the Nation; 
 certain ambitious perfons availed themfelves of 
 it to promote their own views; and the florm, 
 which feemed to have blown over, burfi forth 
 anew. The contending fanaticifm of perfe- 
 cuting fects, joined in the conflict between re- 
 gal haughtinefs and the ambition of indivi- 
 duals; the tempeft blew from every point ot 
 the compafs; the Constitution was rent afunder, 
 and Charles exhibited in his fall an awful ex- 
 ample to the Univerfe.
 
 OF ENGLAND. S3 
 
 The royal power being thus annihilated, 
 the Englifh made fruitlefs attempts to fubfti- 
 tute a republican Government in its ftead. 
 " It was a curious fpedtacle," fays Montefquieu, 
 " to behold the vain efforts of the Englifh to 
 " eftablifh among themfelves a Democracy." 
 Subjected, at firft, to the power of the prin- 
 cipal Leaders in the Long Parliament, they 
 faw that power expire, only to pafs, without 
 bounds, into the hands of a Protector. They 
 faw it afterwards parcelled out among the 
 Chiefs of different bodies of troops; and thus 
 Ihifting without end from one kind of fub- 
 jedtion to another, they were at length con- 
 vinced, that an attempt to eftablifh liberty in 
 a great Nation, by making the people inter- 
 fere in the common bufinefs of Government, 
 is of all attempts the mod chimerical; that 
 the authority of all, with which men are a- 
 mufed, is in reality no more than the autho- 
 rity of a few powerful individuals who divide 
 the Republic among themfelves; and they at 
 laft refted in the bofom of the only Conftitution 
 which is fit for a great State and a free People; 
 I mean that in which a chofen number deli- 
 berate, and a fingle hand executes; but in 
 which, at the fame time, the public fatisfactioa 
 
 E3
 
 34 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 is rendered, by the genenj relation and arrange- 
 ment of things, a neceffary condition of the 
 duration of Government. 
 
 Charles the Second, therefore, was called 
 over; and he experienced on the part of 
 the people, that enthufiafm of affection which 
 ufually attends the return from a long aliena- 
 tion. Ke could net, however, bring himfelf 
 to forgive them the inexpiable crime of which 
 he looked upon them to have been guilty. He 
 faw with the deepeft concern that they {till en- 
 tertained their former notions with regard to 
 the nature of the royal prerogative j and, bent 
 upon the recovery of the ancient powers of 
 the Crown, he only waited for an opportunity 
 to break thofe promifes which had procured 
 his reiteration. 
 
 But the very eagernefs of his meafures fruf- 
 trated their fuccefs. His dangerous alliances 
 on the Continent, and the extravagant wars in 
 which he involved England, joined to the fre- 
 quent abufe he made of his authority, betrayed 
 his defigns. The eyes of the Nation were foon 
 opened, and faw into his projects; when, con- 
 vinced at length that nothing but fixed and ir- 
 refifiible bounds can be an effectual check on 
 the views and efforts of Power, they refolved
 
 OF ENGLAND. 55 
 
 finally to take away thofe remnants of defpo- 
 tifm which Itill made a part of the regal pre- 
 rogative. 
 
 The military fervices due to the Crown, the 
 remains of the ancient feudal tenures, had been 
 already abolifhed : the laws againft heretics 
 were now repealed; the Statute for holding 
 parliaments once at leaft in three years was en- 
 acted ; the Habeas Corpus Aft, that barrier of 
 the Subject's perfonal fafety, was eftablifhed; 
 and, fuch was the patriotifm of the Parlia- 
 ments, that it was under a King the moil de- 
 flitute of principle, that liberty received its 
 moft efficacious fupports. 
 
 At length, on the death of Charles, began 
 a reign which affords a moft exemplary leffon 
 both to Kings and People. James the Second, 
 a prince of a more rigid dilpofition, though 
 of a lefs comprehcnfive undcrftanding, than 
 his late brother, purfued ftill more openly the 
 project which had already proved fo fatal to 
 his family. Pie would not fee that the great 
 alterations which had fucceffively been effected 
 in the Conftitution, rendered the execution of 
 it daily more and more impracticable : he im- 
 prudently fuffered himfeif to be exafperated at 
 a refiftance he was in no condition to overcome; 
 
 E 4
 
 S6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 and, hurried away by a fpirit of defpotifm and 
 a monkifh zeal, he ran headlong againft the 
 rock which was to wreck his authority. 
 
 He not only ufed, in his declarations, the 
 alarming ex predion s of Ablblute Po.ver and 
 Unlimited Obedience he not only ufurped 
 to himfeif a right to difpenfe with the laws; 
 but moreover fought to convert that deftru&ive 
 pretention to the deftruction of thofe very laws 
 which were held moil dear by the Nation, by 
 endeavouring to abohih a religion for which 
 they had fullered the greateft calamities, in or- 
 der to eftabliih, on its ruins a mode of faith 
 which repeated Acts of the Legislature had 
 profcribed; and profcribed, not becaufe it 
 tended to eftabliih in England the dodtrines of 
 Tranfubftantiation and Purgatory, doctrines in 
 themfelves of no political moment, but becaufe 
 the unlimited power of the Sovereign had al- 
 ways been made one of its principal tenets. 
 
 To endeavour therefore to revive fuch a Re- 
 ligion, was not only a violation or the laws, 
 but was, by one enormous violation, to pave i\\Q 
 way for others of a ftill more alarming nature. 
 Hence the Englifh, feeing that their liberty 
 was attacked even in its firft principles, had 
 recourfe to that remedy which reafon and na-<
 
 OF ENGLAND. 57 
 
 ture point out to the People, when he who 
 ought to be the guardian ot the laws becomes 
 their deftroyer: they withdrew the allegiance 
 which they had lworn to James, and thought 
 themfelves abfolved from their oath to a King 
 who himfelf disregarded the oath he had made 
 to his People. 
 
 But, initead of a revolution like that which 
 dethroned Charles the Firft, which was effected 
 by a great effufion of blood, and threw the ftate 
 into a general and terrible convulfion, the de- 
 thronement of James proved a matter of fhort 
 and eafy operation. In confequence of the pro- 
 greffive information of the People, and the cer- 
 tainty of the principles which now directed the 
 Nation, the whole were unanimous. All the 
 ties by which the People were bound to the 
 throne, were broken, as it were, by one fingle 
 fhock; and James, who, the moment before 
 was a Monarch furrounded bv mbjects, became 
 at once a fimple individual in the midft of the 
 Nation. 
 
 That which contributes, above all, to diftin- 
 guiih this event as lingular in the annals of 
 Mankind, is the moderation, I may even fay, 
 the legality which accompanied it. As if to 
 dethrone a King who fought to let himielf
 
 <% THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 above the Laws, had been a natural confequence 
 of, and provided for, by the principles of Go- 
 vernment, every thing remained in its place; 
 the Throne was declared vacant, and a new line 
 of fucceffion was eftabliihed. 
 
 Nor was this all; care was had to repair the 
 breaches that had been made in the Conftitution, 
 as well as to prevent new ones; and advantage 
 was taken of the rare opportunity of entering 
 into an original and exprefs compadt between 
 King ana People. 
 
 An Oath was required of the new King, 
 more precife than had been taken by his pre- 
 deceffors ; and it was confecrated as a perpe- 
 tual formula of fuch oaths. It was deter- 
 mined, that to impofe taxes without the con- 
 fen* of Parliament, as well as to keep up a 
 (landing army in time of peace, are contrary 
 to law. The power which the Crown had con- 
 flantly claimed, of difpenfing with the laws, 
 was abolimed. It was enacted, that the fub- 
 iedt, of whatever rank or degree, had a right 
 to prefent petitions to the King (a). Lallly, 
 
 [a) The Lores and Commons, previous to the Coro- 
 nation of King William and Queen Man, had framed a 
 Bill which contained a declaration cf the rights which 
 they claimed in behalf of the People, and was in con-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 59 
 
 the key-ftone was put to the arch, by the 
 final eftablifhment of the Liberty of the 
 Prefs (a). 
 
 The Revolution of 1689 is therefore the 
 third grand sera in the hiflory of the Constitu- 
 tion of England. The Great Charter had 
 marked out the limits within which the Royal 
 authority ought to be confined ; fome outworks 
 were railed in the reign of Edward the Firft; 
 but it was at the Revolution that the circum- 
 vallation was completed. 
 
 It was at this a?ra, that the true principles of 
 civil fociety were fully eftablifhed. By the ex- 
 puliion of a King who had violated his oath, 
 the doctnne of Refiflance, that ultimate re- 
 fource of an opprcfled People, was confirmed 
 beyond a doubt. By the exclufion given to a 
 
 fequence called the Bill of Rights. This Bill contained 
 the Articles above, as well as fome other:, and having 
 received afterwards the Royal affent, became an Act of 
 Parliament, under the title of An Ad declaring the Rights 
 aud Liberties of the Subject, and fettling the Succejfon of the 
 Crown. A. I William and Mary, Self. 2. Cap. 2. 
 
 (a) The liberty of the prefs was, properly fpeaking, 
 eltabliihec only fo..r years afterward., :n confcquence of 
 the refufai which the Padiament made at that time to con- 
 tinue any longer the reilriclions which had before been iet 
 upon it.
 
 6o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 family hereditarily defpotic, it was finally de- 
 termined, that Nations are not the property of 
 Kings. The principles of Paffive Obedience, 
 the Divine and indefeafible Right of Kings, 
 in a word, the whole fcaffolding of falfe and 
 fuperftitious notions by which the Royal au- 
 thority had till then been fupported, fell to 
 the ground, and in the room of it were fub- 
 flimted the more folid and durable foun- 
 dations of the love of order, and a fenfe of 
 the necemty of civil government among Man- 
 kind. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 Of the Legiflative Pozver, 
 
 N almoft all the States of Europe, the will 
 of the Prince holds the place of law; and 
 cuftom has fo confounded the matter of right 
 with the matter of fact, that their Lawyers 
 generally reprefenc the legiflative authority as 
 effentially attached to the character of King; 
 and the plenitude of his power feems to them 
 neceffarily to flow from the very definition of 
 his title.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 6t 
 
 The Englifh placed in more favourable cir- 
 cumflances, have judged differently : they could 
 not believe that the deftiny of Mankind ought 
 to depend on a play of words, and on fcholaf- 
 tic fubtilties; they have therefore annexed no 
 other idea to the word King, or Roy, a word 
 known alfo to their laws, than that which the 
 Latins annexed to the word Rex, and the 
 northern Nations to that of Cymng, 
 
 In limiting therefore the power of their Kins;, 
 they have adted more confidently with the ety- 
 mology of the word; they have acted alio 
 more confidently with reafon, in not leaving the 
 laws to the difpofal of the perfon who is already 
 inverted with the public power of the State, that 
 is, of the perfon who lies under the greateft and 
 moft important temptations to fet himfelf above 
 them. 
 
 The bafis of the Englifh Constitution, the 
 capital principle on which on all others depend, 
 is that the Legiflative pow r er belongs to Parlia- 
 ment alone; that is to fay, the power of efta- 
 bliihing laws, and of abrogating, changing, or 
 explaining them. 
 
 The constituent parts of Parliament are the 
 King, the Houfe of Lords, and the Houfe of 
 Commons. 
 
 The Houfe of Commons, other wife the Af-
 
 6z THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fembly of the Reprefentatives of the Nation^ 
 is compofed of the Deputies of the different 
 Counties^ each of which fends two; of the 
 Deputies of certain Towns, of which London, 
 including Weftminfter and Southwark, fends 
 eight, other Towns, two or one; and of the 
 Deputies of the Univerfities of Oxford and 
 Cambri^e, each of which fends two. 
 
 Laftly, fince the Act of Union, Scotland fends 
 forty-five Deputies; who, added to thofe juft 
 mentioned, make up the whole number of five 
 hundred and fifty-eight. Thofe Deputies, 
 though feparately elected, do not folely repre- 
 fent the Town or County that fends them, as is 
 the cafe with the Deputies or the United Pro- 
 vinces of the Netherlands, or*of the Swifs Can- 
 tons; but, when they are once admitted, they 
 represent the whole body of the Nation. 
 
 The qualifications required for being a Mem- 
 ber of the Houfe of Commons are, for reprefent- 
 ing a County, to be born a fubject of Great 
 Britain, and to be poffefTed of a landed eftate 
 of fix hundred pounds a year; and of three hun- 
 dred, for reprefenting a Town, or Borough. 
 
 The qualifications required for being an 
 ele&or in a County, are to be poillfied, in 
 that County, of a Freehold of forty ftiiilings
 
 OF ENGLAND. 63 
 
 a year (a). With regard to electors in Towns or 
 Boroughs, they muft be Freemen of them, a 
 word which now fignifies certain qualifications 
 exprefTed in the particular Charters. 
 
 When the King has determined to affemble 
 a Parliament, he fends an order for that purpofe 
 to the Lord Chancellor, who, after receiving 
 the fame, fends a writ under the great fcal of 
 England to the Sheriff of every County, direct- 
 ing him to take the necelTary fteps for the elec- 
 tion of Members for the County, and the Towns 
 and Boroughs contained in it. Three days after 
 the reception of the writ, the Sheriff muft, in 
 his turn, fend his precept to the Magiftrates of 
 the Towns and Boroughs, to order them to 
 make their election within eight days after the 
 reception of the precept, giving four days notice 
 of the fame. And the Sheriff* himielf muft. 
 proceed to the election for the County, not fooner 
 than ten days after the receipt of the writ, nor 
 later than fixteen. 
 
 The principal precautions taken by the 
 law, to infure the freedom of elections, are, 
 
 (a) This Freehold mutl have been pofTeffed by the 
 elector one whole year at leaft before the time of election, 
 except it has devolved to him by inheritance, by marriage. 
 by a laft will, or by promotion to an office.
 
 64 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 that any Candidate, who after the date of the 
 writ, or even after the vacancy, fhall have given 
 entertainments to the electors of a place, or to 
 any of them, in order to his being elected, 
 fhall be incapable of ferving for that place in 
 Parliament. That if any per fori gives, or pro- 
 mi fes to give any money, employment, or re- 
 ward, to any voter, in order to influence his 
 vote, he, as well as the voter himfelf, fhall be 
 condemned to pay a fine of five hundred pounds, 
 and for ever disqualified to vote and hold any 
 office in any corporation; the faculty however 
 being referved to both, of procuring their in- 
 demnity for their own offence, by difcovering 
 force other offender of the lame kind. 
 
 It has been moreover eilablifhed that no 
 Lord of Parliament, or Lord Lieutenant cf a 
 County, has any righr. to interfere in the elec- 
 tions of members; that any officer of the ex- 
 cife, cuftoms, Sec. who fhall prefume to inter- 
 meddle in elections, by iniiuencing any voter 
 to civc or withhold his vote, fhall forfeit one 
 hundred pounds, and be difabled to hold any 
 oiilce. Laillv, all foldiers quartered in a place 
 where an election is to be made, mull move 
 from it, at lead one day before the election, 
 to the uiiTance of two miles or more. :-:.r*
 
 OF ENGLAND. 6$ 
 
 turn not till one day after the election is 
 finifhed. 
 
 The Houfe of Peers, or Lords, is compofed 
 of the Lords Spiritual, who are the Archbiihops 
 of Canterbury and of York, and the twenty- 
 four Bifhops; and of the Lords Temporal, 
 whatever may be their refpective titles, fuch as 
 Dukes, Marquifes, Earls, &c. 
 
 Laftly, the King is the third conftitutive part 
 of Parliament: it is even he alone who can con- 
 voke it; and he alone can diffolve, or prorogue 
 it. The effect of a diflblution is, that from 
 that moment the Parliament completely ceafes 
 to exift; trie commiftion given to the Members 
 "by their Conftituents is at an end; and when- 
 ever a new meeting of Parliament mall happen, 
 they muft be elected anew. A prorogation is 
 an adjournment to a term appointed by the 
 King; till which the exiftence of Parliament is 
 iimply interrupted, and the function of the 
 Deputies fufpended. 
 
 When the Parliament meets, whether it be 
 by virtue of a new fummons, or whether, be- 
 ing compofed of Members formerly elected, it 
 meets again at the expiration of the term for 
 which it had been prorogued, the King either 
 goes to it in perfon, inverted with the infignia 
 of his dignity, or appoints proper perfon^ to 
 
 F
 
 66 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 reprefent him on that occafion, and opens the 
 feffion by laying before the Parliament the ftate 
 of the public affairs, and inviting them to take 
 them into confideratiom This prefence of the 
 King, either real or reprefented, is abfolutcly 
 rcquifite at. the firft' meeting j it is it which 
 gives life to the Legiflative Bodies, and puts 
 them in action. 
 
 The King having concluded his declaration, 
 withdraws. The Parliament, which is then le- 
 gally intruded with the care of the National 
 concerns, enters upon its functions, and con- 
 tinues to exift till it is prorogued, or difiblvcd. 
 The Houfe of Commons, and that of Peers, 
 alTemble feparately : the latter, under the pre- 
 fidence of the Lord Chancellor: the former, 
 under that of their Speaker, and both feparately 
 adjourn to fuch days as they refpectively think 
 proper to appoint. 
 
 As each of the two Houfes has a negative 
 on the proportions made by the other, and 
 there is, confequently, no danger of their en- 
 croaching on each other's rights, nor on thofe 
 of the King, who has likevvife his negative up- 
 on them both, any queliion judged by them 
 conducive to the public good, without excep- 
 tion, may be made the fubjeci" of their refpeo
 
 bf ENGLAND. 67 
 
 live deliberations. Such are, for inftance, new 
 limitations, or extensions, to be given to the au- 
 thority of the Kins:; the eftablifhing; of new 
 laws, or making changes in thofe already in 
 being; Laftly, the different kinds of public 
 provifions, or eftabiifhments, the various abufes 
 of adminiftration, and their remedies, become, 
 in every Seiiion, the object of the attention of 
 Parliament. 
 
 Here, however, an important obfervation 
 muft be made. All Bills for granting Money 
 muft have their beginning in the Houfe of 
 Commons: the Lords cannot take this object 
 into their confederation but in confeauence of 
 a bill prefented to them by the latter; and the 
 Commons have at all times been fo anxioufly 
 tenacious of this privilege^ that they have never 
 buffered the Lords even to make any change in 
 the Money Bills which they have lent to them; 
 and the Lords are expected limply and folely 
 either to accept or reject them. 
 
 This excepted, every Member, in each 
 Houfe, may propofe whatever queftion he thinks 
 proper. If* after being confidered, the matter 
 is found to deferve attention) the perfon who 
 ruade the proportion, ufually with fome others 
 adjoined to him-, is defired to fet it down in 
 writing. If, after more complete difcuffions of 
 
 F 2
 
 68 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the fubjecT:, the propofition is carried in the affir- 
 mative, it is fent to the other Houfe, that they 
 may, in their turn, take it into confidcration. 
 If the other Houfe reject the Bill, it remains 
 without any effect : if they agree to it, nothing 
 remains wanting to its complete eflablifhment, 
 but the Royal Aflcnt. 
 
 When there is no bufinefs that requires im- 
 mediate difpatch, the King ufually waits till 
 the end of the Seffion, or at leaft till a certain 
 number of bills are ready for him, before he 
 declares his royal pleafure. When the time is. 
 come, the King goes to Parliament in the fame 
 Hate with which he opened it; and while he is 
 feated on the Throne, a Clerk, who has a lift 
 of the Bills, gives, or refufes, as he reads the 
 Royal Aii'ent. 
 
 When the Royal Affent is given to a public 
 Bill, the Clerk fays, le Roy le veut. If the biil 
 be a private Bill, he fays, foit fait comme il ejl 
 o.efire. If the bill has fubfidies for its object, 
 lie fays, le Roy remercie fes loyaux Sujefts, accept e 
 teur benevolence & aujfi le veut, Laftly, if the 
 King docs not think proper to affent to the 
 Bill, the Clerk fays, le Roy s'advifera; which is a 
 mild way of giving a refufal. 
 
 It is, however, pretty lingular, that the King 
 of Fngland fhould make ufe of the French
 
 OF ENGLAND. 69 
 
 language to declare his intentions to his Parlia- 
 
 O O 
 
 nient. This cuftom was introduced at the Con- 
 queft (a), and has been continued, like other 
 matters of form, which fometimes fubfift for 
 ages after the real fubftance of things has been 
 altered; and Judge Blackftone exprefles him- 
 felf, on this fubjedt in the following words : 
 " A badge, it mull be owned (now the only 
 (i one remaining), of Conqueft; and which one 
 (C would wifh to fee fall into total oblivion, un- 
 " lefs it be referved as a folemn memento to 
 ie remind us that our liberties are mortal, hav- 
 " ing once been deflroyed by a foreign force." 
 When the King has declared his different 
 intentions, he prorogues the Parliament. Thofe 
 Bills which he has rejected, remain without 
 force : thofe to which he has aflented, become 
 the expreffion of the will of the higheft power 
 acknowledged in England: they have the 
 fame binding force as the Edits enregiftres have 
 
 (a) William the Conqueror added to the other changes 
 he introduced, the abolition of the Englifh language in 
 all public, as well as judicial tranfaftions, and fubftituted 
 to it the French that was fpoke in his timej hence the 
 number of old French words that are met with in the 
 flyle of the Englifh laws. It was only under Edward III. 
 that the Englifh language began to be re-eftablifhed in the 
 Courts of Juftice. 
 
 F3
 
 70 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 in France (a), and as the PopuUfata had in an- 
 cient Rome: in a word, they are Laws. And 
 though each of the confVituent narts of the 
 Parliament might, at fnft, have prevented the 
 exigence of thqfe laws, the united will of alj. 
 the Three is now neceflary to repeal them. 
 
 (a) They call in France, Edits enregtjires, thofe Ed:ls 
 of the King which have been registered in the Court of 
 Parliament. The word Parliament dees not, however, 
 expjefs in France, as it does in England, the Affembly of 
 the Eftates of the Kingdom. The French Parlemens are 
 only Courts of Juftice: that of Paris was instituted in the 
 fame manner, and for the fame purpofes, as the Aula Regis 
 was afterwards in England, viz. for the adminiftration of 
 public Juftice, and for deciding the differences between the 
 King and his Barons : it was in confccuence of the Judg- 
 ments awarded by that Court, that the King proceeded to 
 feize the dominions cf thofe Lords or Princes againft 
 whom a fentence had been paiTed, and when he was able 
 to effect this, united them to the Crown. The Parliament 
 of Paris, as do the other Courts of Law, grounds its 
 judgments upon the Edids or Ordonnances of the King, 
 when it has once regiftered them. When thofe Ordon. 
 nances are looked upon as grievous to the Subject, the 
 Parliament refefes to regiftcr them : but this they do 
 not from any pretention they have to a (hare in the 
 Legislative authority; they only object that they are not 
 fathfied that the 0rdonnav.ee before them is really the will 
 of the King, and then proceed to make remonstrances 
 againit it: femctimes the King defers to thefe ; or, if he 
 is refolved to put an end to all oppofition, he comes in 
 perfon to the Parliament, there holds what they call wi
 
 OF ENGLAND.. 71 
 
 CHAP. V. 
 
 Of the Executive Power. 
 
 WHEN the Parliament is prorogued or 
 diflblved, it ceafes to exift; but its 
 laws ftill continue to be in force : the King re- 
 mains charged with the execution of them, 
 and is fuppljed with, the neceffary power for 
 that purpofe. 
 
 It is however to be obferved that, though 
 in his political capacity of one of the con- 
 stituent parts of the Parliament, that is, with 
 regard to the Share allotted to him in the le- 
 giflative authority, the King is undoubtedly 
 Sovereign, and only needs allege his will 
 when he gives or refufes his alTent to the bills 
 prefented to him; yet, in the exercife of his 
 powers of Government, he is no more than 
 a Magiftrate, and the laws, whether thofe 
 that exifted before him, or thofe to which, 
 by his affent, he has given being, muft direct 
 his conduct, and bind him equally with his 
 fubjecls. 
 
 Lit de jujlice, declares that the Ordonnance before them U 
 actually his will, and orders th3 proper Officer to rcgi fttfr 
 it. 
 
 f 4
 
 iz THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The firft prerogative of the King, in his ca- 
 pacity of Supreme Magiftrate, has for its objedt 
 the adminiftration of Juflice. 
 
 i. He is the fource of all judicial power in 
 the State; he is the Chief of all the Courts of 
 Law, and the Judges are only his Subftitutes; 
 every thing is tranfadted in his name; the Judg- 
 ments mull: be with his Seal, and are executed 
 by his Officers. 
 
 2. By a fidtion of the law, he is looked upon 
 as the univerfal proprietor of the kingdom; he 
 is in cpnfequence deemed diredtly concerned in 
 all offences; and for that reafon profecutions are 
 to be carried on, in his name, in the Courts of law. 
 
 3. He can pardon offences, that is, remit 
 the punilhment that has been awarded in con- 
 fequence of his profecution. 
 
 II. The fecond prerogative of the King, is, 
 to be the fountain of honour, that is, the diftri- 
 butor of titles and dignities: he creates the 
 Peers of the realm, as well as befrows the dif- 
 ferent degrees of inferior Nobility. He more- 
 over difpofes of the different offices, either in 
 the Courts of law, or elfewhere. 
 
 III. The King is the fuperintendent of Com- 
 merce; he has the prerogative of regulating 
 weights and meafures; he alone can coin money., 
 and can give a currency to foreign coine
 
 OF ENGLAND, 73 
 
 IV. He is the Supreme Head of the Churchy 
 In this capacity he appoints the Bifhops, and 
 the two Archbifhops ; and he alone can con- 
 vene the Aflembly of the Clergy. This AfTem- 
 bly is formed, in England, on the model of the 
 Parliament : the Bifhops form the upper Houfe; 
 Deputies from the Diocefes, and from the fe- 
 yeral Chapters, form the lower Houfe: the 
 affent of the King is likewife neceflary to the 
 validity of their Adts, or Canons; and the King 
 can prorogue, or diffolve, the Convocation. 
 
 V. He is, in right of his Crown, the Gene- 
 ral iffi mo of all fea or land forces whatever; 
 he alone can levy troops, equip fleets, build 
 fortreffes, and fill all the polls in them. 
 
 VI. He is, with regard to foreign Nations, 
 the reprefentative and the depofitory, of all 
 the power and collective majefty of the Na- 
 tion: he fends and receives ambafTadors; he 
 contracts alliances; and has the prerogative of 
 declaring war, and of making peace, on what- 
 ever conditions he thinks proper. 
 
 VII. In fine, what feems to carry fo many 
 powers to the height, is, its being a funda- 
 mental maxim, that the King can do no 
 wrong : which does not fignify, however, that 
 the King has not the power of doing ill, or, as 
 it was pretended by certain perfons in former
 
 74 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 times that every thing he did was lawful; but 
 pnly that he is above the reach of all Courts of 
 law whatever, and that his perfon is facred and 
 inviolable. 
 
 CHAP. VI. 
 
 T'he Boundaries which the Conjlitution has fet to 
 the Royal Prerogative. 
 
 IN reading the foregoing enumeration of the 
 powers with which the laws of England 
 have intruded the King, we are at a lofs to 
 reconcile them with the idea of a Monarchy, 
 which, we are told, is limited. The King not 
 only unites in himfelf all the branches of the 
 Executive power, he not only difpofes, with- 
 out controul, of the whole military power in 
 the State, but he is moreover, it feems, 
 Matter of the Law itfelf, fince he calls up, and 
 difmifTes, at his will, the Legislative Bodies. 
 We find him, therefore, at firft fight, invefled 
 with all the prerogatives that ever were claimed 
 by the moft abfolute Monarchs; and we are at 
 a lofs to find that liberty which the Englifh 
 feem fo confident they poffefs. 
 
 But the Reprefentatives of the people Hill 
 have, and that is faying enough, they {till have 
 in their hands, now that the Conflitution 13
 
 OF ENGLAND, 7$ 
 
 fully eftablifhcd, the fame powerful weapon 
 which has enabled their ancestors to eftablifh 
 it. It is (till from their liberality alone that 
 the King can obtain fubfidies; and in thefe 
 ([lays, when every thing is rated by pecuniary 
 eftimation, when gojd is become the great 
 moving fpring of affairs, it may be fafely af- 
 firmed, that he who depends on the will of 
 other men, with regard to fp important an 
 article, is, whatever his power may be in other 
 refpets, in a flate of real dependence. 
 
 This is the cafe pf the King of England. 
 He has, in that capacity, and without the grant 
 of his people, fcarcely any revenue. A few 
 hereditary duties on the exportation of wool, 
 which (fince the eftabliihment of manufactures) 
 are become tacitly extinguished; a branch 
 of the excife, which, under Charles the Second, 
 wa: annexed to the Crown as an indemnifica- 
 tion for the military fervices it gave up, and 
 which, under George the Firft, has been fixed 
 to feven thoufand pounds; a duty of two 
 (hillings on every ton of wine imported; the 
 wrecks of (hips of which the owners remain 
 unknown; whales and fturgeons thrown on the 
 coaft; fwans fwimming on public rivers; and 
 a few other feudal relics, now compofe the 
 whole appropriated revenue of the King, and
 
 76 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 are all that remains of the ancient inheritance 
 of the Crown. 
 
 The King of England, therefore, has the 
 prerogative of commanding armies, and equip- 
 ping fleets but without the concurrence of his 
 Parliament he cannot maintain them. He can 
 beftow places and employments but without 
 his Parliament he cannot pay the falaries at- 
 tending on them. He can declare war, but 
 without his Parliament it is impoflible for him 
 to carry it on. In a word, the Royal Preroga- 
 tive, deftitute as it is of the power of impofmg 
 taxes, is like a vaft body, which cannot of itfelf 
 accomplifh. its motions ; or, if you pleafe, it is 
 like a fhip completely equipped, but from 
 which the Parliament can at pleafure draw off 
 the water, and leave it aground, and alfo fet 
 k afloat again, by granting fubfidies. 
 
 And indeed we fee, that, fince the eftablim- 
 meiit of this right of the Reprefentatives of 
 the People, to grant, or refute, fubfidies to the 
 Crown, their other privileges have been con- 
 tinually increafing. Though thefe Reprefen- 
 tatives were not, in the beginning, admitted 
 into Parliament but upon the moil: difadvan- 
 tageous terms, yet they foon found means, by 
 joining petitions to their money-bills, to have 
 a fliare in framing thofe laws by which they
 
 OF ENGLAND. 77 
 
 were in future to be governed ; and this method 
 of proceeding, which at firft was only tolerated 
 by the King, they afterwards converted into an 
 exprefs right, by declaring, under Henry the 
 Fourth, that they would not, thenceforward, 
 come to any refolutions with regard to fubfidies, 
 before the King had given a precife anfwer to 
 their petitions. 
 
 In fubfequent times we fee the Commons 
 sonftantly fuccefsful, by their exertions of the 
 fame privilege, in their endeavours to lop off 
 the defpotic powers which (till made a part of 
 the regal prerogative. Whenever abufes of 
 power had taken place, which they were fe- 
 rioufly determined to corredt, they made grie- 
 vances and fupplieS) to ufe the expreflion of Sir 
 Thomas Wentworth, go hand in hand together, 
 which always produced the redrefs of them. 
 And in general, when a bill, in confequence of 
 its being judged by the Commons effential to 
 the public welfare, has been joined by them to 
 a money bill, it has feldom failed to pafs in that 
 agreeable company (a). 
 
 (a) In mentioning the forcible ufe which the Com- 
 mons have at times made of their power of granting 
 fubfidies, by joining provifions of a different nature to 
 bills that had grants for their objett, I only mean to 
 fhew the great efficiency of that power, which was the 
 fubjett of this Chapter, without pretending to fay any
 
 *8 ^HE CbNSTiTUTidH 
 
 CHA^. VII. 
 The fame Subjtft continued* 
 
 BUT this force of the prerogative of the 
 Commons, and the facility with which 
 it may be exerted^ however neceffary they may 
 have been for the firft eilabiilhment of the Con- 
 flitution^ might prove too confiderable at pre- 
 fent, when it is requifite only to fuppbrt it. 
 There might be the danger, that, if the Parlia- 
 ment fhould ever exert their privilege to its full 
 extent, the Prince, reduced to defpair, might 
 refort to fatal extremities j or that the Confti- 
 tution, which fublifts only by virtue of its equi- 
 librium, might in the end be fubyerted. 
 
 Indeed this is a cafe which the prudence of 
 Parliament has forefeem They have, in this 
 refpedtj impofed laws upon themfelves; and 
 without touching the prerogative itfelf, they 
 
 thing as to the propriety of the meafure. The Hoafe of 
 Lords have even Found it necefiary (which confirms what 
 is faid here) to form., as it were, a confederacy among 
 themfelves, for the fecurity of their Legiflative autho- 
 rity, againft the unbounded ufe which the Commons might 
 make of their power of taxation ; and it has been made 
 a (landing order of their Houfe, to reject any bill what- 
 foever to which a money-bill has been tackid.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 7$ 
 
 have moderated the exercife of it. A cuftom 
 has for a long time prevailed, at the beginning 
 of every reign, and in the kind of overflowing 
 of affection which takes place between a King 
 and his firft Parliament, to grant the King a 
 revenue for his life; a provifion which, with 
 refpedt to the great exertions of his power, does 
 not abridge the influence of the Commons, but 
 yet puts him in a condition to fupport the dig- 
 nity of the Crown, and affords him, who is the 
 firfl Magiftrate in the Nation, that indepen- 
 dence which the laws infure alfo to thofe Ma- 
 gistrates who are particularly intrufted with the 
 adminiftration of Juftice (a). 
 
 This conduct of the Parliament provides an 
 admirable remedy for the accidental diforders 
 of the State. For though, by the wife diflri- 
 bution of the powers of Government, great 
 
 (a) The twelve Judges. Their com millions, which in 
 former times were often given them durante bene placito, 
 now muft always " be made quamdiu fe bene gejferint, and 
 " their falaries afcertained : but upon an addrefs of both 
 Houfes it may be lawful to remove them." Stat. 13 
 Will. 111. c. 2. In the firft year of the reign of his pre- 
 sent Majefty, it has been moreover enacled, that the com- 
 mifllons of the Judges fhall continue in force, notwith- 
 ftanding the demife of the King; which ha? prevented 
 their being dependent, with regard to their continuatiom 
 in office, on the heir apparent. 8
 
 So THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 nfurpations are become in a manner imprac*' 
 ticable, neverthetefs it is impoffible but that, 
 in confequence of the continual, though filent 
 efforts of the Executive power to extend itfelf, 
 abufes will at length flide in. But here the 
 powers, wifely kept in referve by the Parlia- 
 liament, afford the means of remedying them.' 
 At the end of each reign, the civil lift, and 
 confequently that kind of independence which 
 it procured, are at an end. The fucceffor finds 
 a Throne, a Sceptre, and a Crown; but he 
 finds neither power, nor even dignity; and be- 
 fore a real pofTefiion of all thefe things is given 
 him, the Parliament have it in their power to 
 take a thorough review of the State, as well as 
 correct the feveral abufes that may have crept 
 in during the preceding reign ; and thus the 
 Conftitution may be brought back to its firft 
 principles. 
 
 England, therefore, by this means, enjoys one 
 very great advantage, one that all free States 
 have fought to procure for themfelves ; I mean 
 .that of a periodical reformation. But the ex- 
 pedients which Legifiators have contrived for 
 this purpofe in other Countries, have always, 
 when attempted to be carried into practice, 
 been found to be productive of very difadvan- 
 tageous confequences, Thofe laws which were
 
 OF ENGLAND. 81 
 
 made in Rome, to reftore that equality which 
 is the effence of a Democratical Government, 
 were always found impracticable : the attempt 
 alone endangered the overthrow of the Repub- 
 lic; and the expedient which the Florentines 
 called ripigliar il Jlato, proved nowife happier in 
 its confequences. This was becaufe all thofe 
 different remedies were deftroyed beforehand, 
 by the very evils they were meant to cure; and 
 the greater the abufes were, the more impoflible 
 it was to correct them. 
 
 But the means of reformation which the Par- 
 liament of England has taken care to refervc 
 to itfelf, is the more effectual, as it goes lefs 
 directly to its end. It does not oppofe the 
 ufurpations of prerogative, as it were, in front 
 it does not encounter it in the middle of its 
 career, and in the fulled flight of its exertion : 
 but it goes in fearch of it to its fource, and to 
 the principal of its action. It does not endea- 
 vour forcibly to overthrow it; it only enervates 
 its fprings. 
 
 What increafes ftill more the mildnefs of 
 the operation, is, that it is only to be applied 
 to the ufurpations themfelves, and paffes by, 
 what would be far more formidable to encoun- 
 ter, the obftinacy and pride of the ufurper?. 
 
 G
 
 *2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Every thing is tranfa&ed with a new Sove- 
 reign, who, till then, has had no fhare in public 
 affairs, and has taken no ftep which he may- 
 conceive himfelf bound in honour to fupport. 
 In fine, they do not wreft from him what the 
 good of the State requires he fhould give up : 
 he himfelf makes the iacrifice. 
 
 The truth of all thefe cbfervations is remark- 
 ably confirmed by the events that followed the 
 reign of the two laft Henries. Every barrier 
 that protected the People againft the excurfions 
 of Power had been broke through. The Par- 
 liament, in their terror, had even enacted that 
 proclamations, that is the will of the King, 
 fhould have the force of laws {a) : the Con* 
 flitution feemed really undone. Yet, on the 
 firft opportunity afforded by a new reign, li- 
 berty began again to make its appearance (). 
 And when the Nation, at length recovered 
 from its long fupineneis, haa\ at the acceffion 
 of Charles the Firft, another opportunity of 
 a change of Sovereign, that enormous mafs 
 
 {a) Stat. 31 Hen. VIII. chap. 8. 
 
 {i) The laws concerning Treafon, parted under Henry 
 the Eighth, which Judge Blackltone calis " an amazing 
 " heap of wild and new-fangled treafor. *," were, together 
 with the ftatute juft mentioned, repealed in the beginning 
 of the reign of Edward VI.
 
 6F ENGLAND. 83 
 
 ftf abufes, which had been accumulating, or 
 gaining {Irertgth, during five fitcceffive reigns, 
 was removed, and the ancient laws were re- 
 ftdred. 
 
 To which add, that this fecond reformation, 
 which was fo extenfive iri its effects, and might 
 be called a new creation of the Conftitution, 
 was accompliihed without producing the lead 
 convulfion. Charles the Firft, in the fame 
 manner as Edward ' id done in former times (#), 
 affented to every regulation that was palled; 
 and whatever reluctance he might at firfb ma- 
 nifeft, yet the Act called the Petition of Right 
 (as well as the Bill which afterwards completed 
 the work) received the Royal Sanction without 
 bloodlhed. 
 
 It is true, great misfortunes followed ; but 
 they were the effects of particular circum- 
 flances.. During the time which preceded 
 the reign of the Tudors, the nature and ex- 
 tent of regal authority having never been ac- 
 curately defined, the exorbitant power of the 
 Princes of that Houfe had gradually intro- 
 duced political prejudices of even an extrava- 
 
 (a) Or, which is equally in point, the Duke of Somerfet 
 his uncle, who was the Regent of the Kingdom, unds: 
 the name of Protector. 
 
 G 2
 
 H THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 gant kind: thofe prejudices, having had a 
 hundred and fifty years to take root, could 
 not be fhaken off but by a kind of general 
 convulfion; the agitation continued after the 
 action, and was carried to excefs by the reli- 
 gious quarrels that arofe at that time. 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 Nezv Reftriftions. 
 
 THE Commons, however, have not entirely 
 relied on the advantages of the great 
 prerogative with which the Conilitution has 
 intruded them. 
 
 Though this prerogative is, in a man- 
 ner, out of danger of an immediate attack, 
 thev have neverthelefs fhewn at all times the 
 greateft jealoufy on its account. They never 
 fuffer, as we have obierved before, a money- 
 bill to begin any where but with themfelvesj 
 and any alteration that may be made in it, in 
 the other Houfe, is fure to be rejected. If 
 the Commons had not mofl ftrictly referved 
 to themfelves the exercife of a prerogative 
 on which their very exiflence depends, the 
 1
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 85 
 
 whole might at length have Hidden into that 
 other body which they might have differed to 
 fhare in it equally with them. If any other per- 
 fons befides tne Reprefentatives of -the People, 
 had a right to make an offer of the produce 
 of the labour of the people, the executive 
 Power would foon have forgot, that it only 
 exiils for the advantage of the public (#). 
 
 {a) As the Crown had the undifputed prerogative of 
 afTenting to, and diffenting from, what bills it thinks pro- 
 per, as well as of convening, proroguing, and diflblving, 
 the Parliament, whenever it pleafes, the latter have no 
 aflurance of having a regard paid to their Bills, or even of 
 being allowed to aifemble, but what may refult from the 
 need the down ftands in of their affiftance: the danger, 
 in that refpect, is even greater for the Commons than for 
 the Lords, who enjoy a dignity which is hereditary, as 
 well as inherent to their perfons, and form a permanent 
 Body in the State ; whereas the Commons completely 
 vanifh, whenever a diffolution takes place: there is, there- 
 fore, no exaggeration in what has been faid above, that 
 fheir -very being depends on their power of granting fub- 
 fidies to the Crown. 
 
 Moved by theie confiderations, and no doubt by a 
 fenfe of their duty towards their Conftituents, to whom 
 this right of taxation originally belongs, the Houfe of 
 Commons have at all times been very careful left pre- 
 cedents mould be eftablifhed, which might, in the moft 
 diftant manner, tend to weaken that right. Hence the 
 warmth, I might fay the refentment, with which they 
 have always rejected even the amendments propofcd bv 
 
 3
 
 $6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Befides, though this prerogative has of itfelf, 
 we may fay, an irrefiftible efficiency, the Par- 
 liament has negle&ed nothing that may increafe 
 it, or at leaft the facility of its exercife; and 
 though they have allowed the general preroga- 
 tives of the Sovereign to remain undifputed, 
 they have in feveral cafes endeavoured to re- 
 train the ufe he might make of them, by en- 
 tering with him into divers exprefs and folemn 
 conventions for that purpofe (a). 
 
 Thus, the King is indifputably inverted with 
 the exclusive right of affembling Parliaments: 
 
 the Lords in their Money Bills. The Lords, however ^ 
 have not given up their pretention to make fuch amend- 
 ments ; and it is only by the vigilance and conusant pre- 
 determination of the Commons to reject ail alteration 
 whatever made in their Money Bill;, without even ex- 
 amining them, that this pretenfion of the Lords is reduced 
 to be an ufelefs, and only dormant, claim. The hrit, m- 
 ftance of a mifunderftanding between the two Houfes, on 
 that account, was in the year 1671 ; and the reader may 
 fee at length, in Vol. I. of the Debates of the Houfe cf 
 Commons, the reafons that were at that time alledged on 
 feoth fide 5. 
 
 [a) Laws made to bind fuch Powers in a State, as 
 have no fuperior power by which they may be legally 
 compelled to the execution of them (for inftance, the 
 Crown, as tircumftanced in England) are nothing more 
 than general conventions, or treaties, made with the Body 
 pf tfye Ppople.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 87 
 
 yet he mufl aflemble one, at leaft once in three 
 years; and this obligation on the King, which, 
 was, we find, infilled upon by the People in 
 very early times, has been fince coniirmed by 
 an act paffed in the fixteenth year of the reign 
 of Charles the Second. 
 
 Moreover, as the mod fatal confequences 
 might enfue, if laws which might molt ma- 
 terially affect public liberty, could be enacted 
 in Parliaments abruptly and imperfectly fum- 
 moned, it has been eftablilhed that the Writs 
 for affembling a Parliament mull: be iflued 
 forty days at leaft before the fir ft meeting of it. 
 Upon the fame principle it has alfo been en- 
 acted, that the King cannot abridge the term 
 he has once fixed for a prorogation, except in 
 the two following cafes, viz. of a rebellion, or 
 of imminent danger of a foreign invafion; in 
 both which cafes a fourteen days notice mull 
 be given (4). 
 
 Again, the King is the head of the Church ; 
 but he can neither alter the eftablilhed re- 
 ligion, or call individuals to an account for 
 their religious opinions (). He cannot even 
 
 [a) Stat. 30 Geo. II. c. 25. 
 
 {b) The Convocation^ or aftembly of the Clergy, of 
 yhich the King is the head, can only regulate fuch affairs 
 
 G4
 
 S8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 profefs the religion which the Legislature has 
 particularly forbidden; and the Prince who 
 Ihould profefs it, is declared incapable of in- 
 Meriting, poffejfmg, or enjoying, the Crown of thefe 
 Kingdoms (a). 
 
 The King is the firfl Magiftrate; but he can 
 make no change in the maxims and forms con- 
 fecrated by law or cuftom: he cannot even in- 
 fluence, in any cafe whatever, the decifion of 
 caufes between fubject and fubjedt; and James 
 the Firft, aflifting at the Trial of a caufe, was 
 reminded by the Judge, that he could deliver 
 no opinion (b). Laftly, though crimes are 
 profecuted in his name, he cannot refufe to 
 lend it to any particular perfons who have com- 
 plaints to prefer. 
 
 as are merely ecclefiafUcal ; they cannot touch the Laws, 
 Cuftoms, and Statutes, of the Kingdom. Stat. 25 
 Hen. VIII. c. 19. 
 
 {a) 1 Will, and }A. Stat. 2. c. 2. 
 
 () Thete principles have fince been made an exprefs 
 article of an Ad of Parliament; the fame which aboliihed 
 the Star-Chamber. " Be it likevvife declared and enadted* 
 " by the authority of this prefent Parliament, That 
 " neither his Majefty, nor his Privy Council, have, or 
 *' ought to have any jurifdidlion, power, or authority, to 
 ' examine or draw into queftion, determine, or difpofe 
 " of the lands, tenements, goods, or chattels, of any of 
 * l the fubjecU of this Kingdom." Stat. A. 16. Ch. I. 
 cap. 10. 10.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 98 
 
 The King has the privilege of coining mo- 
 ney; but he cannot alter the ftandard. 
 
 The King has the power of pardoning offen* 
 ders ; but he cannot exempt them from making 
 a compenfatiou to the parties injured. It is even 
 eftabltfhed by law, that, in a cafe of murder, 
 the widow, or next heir, fhall have a right to 
 profecute the murderer; and the King's pardon, 
 whether it preceded the Sentence pafled in con- 
 fequence of fuch profecution, or whether it be 
 granted after it, cannot have any effecl: (a). 
 
 The King has the military power; but flill 
 with refpect to this, he is not abfolute. It is 
 true, in regard to the iea-forces, as there is in 
 them this very great advantage, that they 
 cannot be turned againft the liberty of the 
 Nation, at the fame time that they are the 
 fureft bulwark of the ifland, the King may 
 keep them as he thinks proper; and in this 
 refpeft he lies only under the general reftraint 
 of applying to Parliament for obtaining the 
 means of doing it. But in regard to land 
 forces, as they may become an immediate 
 
 {a) The method of profecution mentioned here, is called 
 3n Appeal; it mull be fued within a year and a day after 
 the completion of the crime.
 
 9 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 weapon in the hands of Power, for throwing 
 down all the barriers of public liberty, the 
 King cannot raife them without the confent of 
 Parliament. The Guards of Charles the Se- 
 cond were declared antirconftitutional (a); and 
 James's army was one of the caules of his be- 
 ing dethroned (). 
 
 In thefe times, however, when it is become 
 a cuftom with Princes to keep thofe numerous 
 armies which {erve as a pretext and means of 
 opprefling the People, a State that would mainr 
 tain its independence, is obliged, in a great 
 meafure, to do the fame. The Parliament has 
 therefore thought proper to eftabliiTi a Handing 
 body of troops, which amounts to about thirty 
 thoufand Men, of which the King has the 
 command. 
 
 But this army is only eftablifhed for one 
 year; at the end of that term, it is (unlels re- 
 eftablifhed) to be ipfe facto difbanded; and 
 as the queftion which then lies before Parlia- 
 
 (a) He had carried them to the number of four thou- 
 fand Men. 
 
 () A new fan&ion has been given to the above re- 
 ftriction in the fixth Article of the Bill of Rights : " A 
 " {landing army, without the confent of Parliament, is 
 f againft law."
 
 OF ENGLAND, $t 
 
 Bnent, is not, whether the army Jhall be dijolved, 
 but whether it fhall be ejlablijhed anew, as if it 
 had never exifted, any one of the three branches 
 of the Legislature may, by its diflent, hinder 
 its continuance. 
 
 Befides, the funds for the payment of this 
 body of troops are to be railed by taxes that 
 never are eftablifhed for more than one year 
 (a) ; and it becomes likeivife necelTary, at the 
 end of this term again to eftabliih them (). 
 In a word, this instrument of*'defence, which 
 the circumftances of modern times have caufed 
 to be judged neceffary, being capable, on the 
 other hand, of being applied to the moft dan- 
 gerous purpofes, has been joined to the State 
 by only a flender thread, the knot of which may 
 be flipped, on the fjrft appearance of danger (<:) 
 
 {a) The land-tax, and malt-tax. 
 
 (b) It is alfo neceffary that the Parliament, when they 
 renew the At called the Mutiny Aft, fhould authorife the 
 different Courts Martial to punifh military offences, and 
 defertion. It can therefore refufe the King even the nc- 
 Ceffary power of military difcipljne. 
 
 (r) To thefe laws, or rather conventions, between King 
 and People, I mall add here the Oath which the King 
 takes at his Coronation; a compact which, if it cannot 
 have the fame precifion as the laws we have related 
 above, yet in a manner comprehends them all, and has 
 the farther advantage of being declared with more fo- 
 Jemnity.
 
 52 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But thefe laws which limit the King's au- 
 thority, would not, of themfelves, have been 
 fufficient. As they are, after all, only in- 
 tellectual barriers, which it is poffible that the 
 King might not at all times refpecl, as the 
 check which the Commons have on his pro- 
 ceedings, by a refufal of fubfidies, affects too 
 much the whole State, to be exerted on every 
 particular abufe of his power; and laflly, as 
 
 ** The archhijbop or bijhop Jhall fay, Will you folemnly 
 " promife and fwear to govern the people of this King- 
 " dom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, 
 " according to the Statutes of Parliament agreed on, and 
 *' the laws and cuftoms of the fame ? The king or queen 
 * l jhall fay, I folemnly promife fo to do. 
 
 *' Archbijhop or bijhop. Will you to your power caufe 
 *' law and juftice, in mercy, to be executed in all your 
 " judgments? King or queen. I will. 
 
 " Archbijhop or bijhop. Will you to the utmoft of 
 " your power maintain the laws of God, the true pro- 
 " feflion of the gofpel, and the proteftant reformed 
 ' religion eftablifhed by the law? And will you pre- 
 * ferve unto the bifhops and clergy of this realm, and to 
 <f the churches committed to their charge, all fuch rights 
 * and privileges as by law do or fhall appertain unto 
 ' them, or any of them \King or queen. All this I 
 " promife to do. 
 
 " After this the king or queen, laying his or her hand upon 
 the holy gojpels, Jhall fay, The things which I have here 
 * before promifed I will perform and keep : fo help me 
 God. And then Jhall kijs the boot"-
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 93 
 
 ven this means might in fome degree be 
 eluded, either by breaking the protnifes which 
 have procured fubfidies, or by applying them 
 to ufes different from thofe for which they were 
 appointed, the Conftitution has befides fup- 
 plied the Commons with a means of immediate 
 oppofition to the mifcondudt of Government, 
 by giving them a right to impeach the Minifters. 
 
 It is true, the King himfelf cannot be ar- 
 raigned before Judges; becaufe, if there were 
 any that could pafs fentence upon him, it would 
 be they, and not he, who muft finally poflefs 
 the executive power : but, on the other hand, 
 the King cannot ad: without Minifters; it is 
 therefore thofe Miniilers, that is, thofe indif- 
 penfable inftruments, whom they attack. 
 
 If, for example, the public money has been 
 employed in a manner contrary to the declared 
 intention of thofe who granted it, an impeach- 
 ment may be brought againft thofe who had the 
 management of it. If any abufe of power is 
 committed, or in general any thing done con- 
 trary to the public weal, they profecute thofe 
 who have been either the inftruments, or the 
 advifers of the mcafure (a). 
 
 {a) It was upon thefe principles that the Commons, in 
 the beginning of this century, impeached the Earl of
 
 $4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But who fhall be the Judges to decide in fuch 
 a caufe ? What Tribunal will flatter itfelf, thas 
 it can give an impartial decifion, when it fhall 
 fee, appearing at its bar, the Government itfelf 
 as the accufed, and the Reprefentatives of the 
 People, as the accufers? 
 
 It is before the Houfe of Peers that the Law 
 has directed the Commons to carry their accu- 
 fation ; that is, before Judges whole dignity, 
 On the one hand, renders them independent, 
 and who, on the other, have a great honour 
 to fupport in that awful function where they 
 have all the Nation for fpectators of their 
 conduct. 
 
 When the impeachment h brought to the 
 Lords, they commonly order the perfon ac- 
 cufed to be impfifoned. On the day appointed, 
 the Deputies of the Houfe of Commons, with 
 the perfon impeached, make their appearance; 
 the impeachment is read in his prefence; Coun- 
 fel are allowed him, as well as time, to prepare 
 for his defence; and at the expiration of this 
 term, the trial goes on from day to day, with 
 open doors, and every thing is communicated 
 in print to the public. 
 
 Oxford, who had advifed the Treaty of Partition, and the 
 Lord Chancellor Somers, who had affixed the great feal 
 to it.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 9$ 
 
 But whatever advantage the law grants to 
 the perfon impeached for his juftification, it 
 is from the intrinfic merits of his conduct that 
 he muft draw his arguments and proofs. It 
 would be of no fervice to him, in order to 
 juftify a criminal conduct, to allege the com- 
 mands of the Sovereign; or, pleading guilty 
 with refpect to the meafures imputed to him,, 
 to produce the Royal pardon (a). It is againft 
 the Administration itfelf that the impeach* 
 ment is carried on; it fnould therefore by no 
 means interfere: the King can neither flop 
 
 (a) This point in ancient times was far from being 
 clearly fettled. In the year 1678, the Commons having 
 impeached the Earl of Danby, he pleaded the King's par- 
 don in bar to that impeachment: great altercations enfued 
 on that fubject, which were terminated by the difTolution 
 of that Parliament. It has been unce enacled, (Stat. 12 
 and 13 W. III. c. 2.) " that no pardon under the great- 
 " feal can be pleaded in bar to an impeachment by the 
 '* Ho ui"e of Commons." 
 
 I once afked a Gentleman very learned in the laws of 
 this Country, if the King could remit the punifament of a 
 Man condemned in confequence of an impeachment of the 
 Houfe of Commons ; he anfwered me, the Tories wi,ll tell 
 you the King can, and the Whigs he cannot. 'But it is 
 not perhaps very material that the queltion mould be de- 
 cided : the great public ends are attained when a corrupt 
 Minifter is removed with difgrace, and the whole Syftem 
 of his proceedings unveiled to the public eye.
 
 96 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 nor fufpend its courfe, but is forced to behold, 
 as an inactive fpeftator, the difcovery of the 
 fiiare which he may himfelf have had in the 
 illegal proceedings of his fervants, and to hear 
 his own fentence in the condemnation of his 
 Miniflers. 
 
 An admirable expedient! which, by re- 
 moving and punilhing corrupt Miniflers, af- 
 fords an immediate remedy for the evils of the 
 State, and flrongly marks out the bounds within 
 which Power ought to be confined: which 
 takes away the fcandal of guilt and authority 
 united, and calms the people by a great and 
 awful act of Juftice: an expedient, in this re- 
 flect efpecially, fo highly ufeful, that it is to 
 the want of the like, that Machiavel attributes 
 the ruin of his Republic. 
 
 But all thefe general precautions to fecure the 
 rights of the Parliament, that is, thofe of the 
 Nation itfelf, againit the efforts of the executive 
 Power, would be vain, if the Members them- 
 felves remained peribnally expofed to them. 
 Being; unable openly to attack, with any fafety 
 to itfelf, the two legislative bodies, and by a 
 forcible exertion of its prerogatives, to make, 
 as it were, a general affault, the executive power 
 mi-ht, by fubdividing the fame prerogatives.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 97 
 
 gain an entrance, and fometimes by intereft, and 
 at others by fear, guide the general will, by 
 influencing that of individuals. 
 
 But the laws which fo effectually provide 
 for the fafety of the People, provide no lefs 
 for that of the Members, whether of the 
 Houfe of Peers, or that of the Commons. 
 There are not known in England, either thole 
 CommiJfarieSy who are always ready to find 
 thofe guilty whom the wantonnefs of ambi- 
 tion points out, nor thole fecret imprifon- 
 ments which are, in other Countries, the 
 ufual expedients of Government. As the 
 forms and maxims of the Courts of Juftice 
 are flridtly preicribedj and every individual 
 has an invariable right to be judged accord- 
 ing to Law, he may obey without fear the 
 dictates of public virtue. Laftly, what crowns 
 all thefe precautions, is its being a fundamen- 
 tal maxim, " That the freedom of fpeech, 
 <c and debates and proceedings in Parliament;, 
 " ought not to be impeached or questioned 
 " in any Court or place out of Parlia- 
 " ment (a)." 
 
 ' ^} Bill of. Rights. Art. 9.. 
 
 It
 
 9"S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The legislators, on the other hand, have 
 riot forgot that intereft, as well as fear, inaj" 
 impofe filence on duty. To prevent its effects, 
 it has been ena&edj that all perfons con- 
 cerned in the management of any taxes created 
 fince 1692, commiiTioners of prizes, navy, 
 vi&ualling-oirlce, &c. comptrollers of the army 
 accounts, agents for regiments, the clerks in 
 the different offices of the revenue, any perfons 
 that hold any new office under the Crown, 
 created fince 1:705, or having a penfion under 
 the Crown, during plcafure, or for any term of 
 years, arc incapable of being; elected Members. 
 Befides, if any Member accepts an office under 
 the Crown, except it be an officer in the army 
 or navy accc nting a new commiffion, his feat 
 becomes void ; though fuch Member is capable 
 of being re- elected. 
 
 Such are the precautions hitherto taken by 
 the Legifiators, for preventing the undue in- 
 fluence of the great prerogative of difpofing 
 of rewards and places : precautions which 
 have been fuccefiively taken, according as 
 circumfbances have fhewn them to be necef- 
 iarv ; and which we may thence fuppofe, are 
 owing to cauics powerful enough to produce
 
 OF ENGLAND. - - - 
 
 produce the eflablifhment of new ones, when- 
 ever circumftances ihall point out the riecefilty 
 of them (a). 
 
 (a) Nothing can be a better proof of the efficacy of 
 the caufes that produce the liberty of the Englifh, and 
 which will be explained hereafter, than thofe viftories 
 which the Parliament from time to time gains over kfelf, 
 and in which the Members, forgetting all views of private 
 ambition, only think of their intereft as fubje&s, 
 
 Since this was firfl written, an excellent regulatioa 
 has been made for the decifion of controverted elections. 
 Formerly the Houfe decided them in a very fummary 
 manner, and the witneft'es were hot examined upon oath* 
 But, by an Aft palled a few years ago, the decifion is 
 now to be left to a Jury, or Committee, of fifteen Mem- 
 bers, formed in the following manner. Out of the 
 Members prefent, who muft not be lefs than one hun- 
 dred, forty-nine are drawn by lots : out of thefe, each 
 Candidate ftrikes off one alternately; till there remain 
 only thirteen, who, with two others, named out of the 
 whole Houfe, one by each Candidate, are to form the 
 Committee: in order to fecure the neceiTary number of 
 a hundred Members, all other bufinefs in the Houfe 
 3s to be fufpended, till the above operations are com- 
 pleted. 
 
 Hi
 
 ioo THE CONSTITUTION* 
 
 CHAP. IX. 
 
 Of private Liberty, or the Liberty of Indivi- 
 duals, 
 
 WE have hitherto only treated of general 
 liberty, that is of the rights of the Na- 
 tion as a Nation, and of its mare in the Govern- 
 ment. It now remains that we mould treat 
 particularly of a thing without which this ge- 
 neral liberty, being abfolutely fruftrated in its 
 object, would be only a matter of oflentation, 
 and even could not long fubiift, I mean the 
 liberty of individuals. 
 
 Private Liberty, according to the divifion of 
 the Engliih Lawyers, confifts, firft, of the right 
 of Property, that is of the right of enjoying ex- 
 clufively the gifts of fortune, and all the va- 
 rious fruits of one's induflry. Secondly, of the 
 right of Perfonal Security. Thirdly, of the Loco* 
 motive Faculty, taking the word Liberty in its 
 more confined fenfe. 
 
 Each of thefe rights, fay again the Engliih 
 Lawyers, is inherent in the pcrfon of every 
 Englishman : they are to him as an inherit- 
 ance, and he cannot be deprived of them, but 
 by virtue of a fentence pafTed according to the
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 101 
 
 laws of the land. And, indeed, as this right of 
 inheritance is expreffed in Engliih by one word 
 (birth-right), the fame as that which expreffes 
 the King's title to the Crown, it has, in times 
 of oppreflion, been often oppofed to him as a 
 right, doubtlefs of lefs extent, but of a fanction 
 equal to that of his own. 
 
 One of the principal effects of the right of 
 Property is, that the King can take from his 
 fubjects no part of what they poflefsj he mud 
 wait till they themfelves grant it him : and this 
 right, which, as we have feen before, is, by its 
 confequences, the bulwark that protects all 
 the others, has moreover the immediate effect 
 of preventing one of the chief caufes of op- 
 preflion. 
 
 In regard to the attempts to which the right 
 of property might be expofed from one indi- 
 vidual to another, I believe I mall have faid 
 every thing, when I have obferved, that there 
 is no Man in England who can oppofe the ir- 
 refiftible power of the Laws, that, as the 
 Judges cannot be deprived of their employ- 
 ments but on an accufation by Parliament, 
 the effect of intereft with the Sovereign, or 
 with thofe who approach his perfon, can 
 fcarcely influence their decifions, that, as the 
 Judges themfelves have no power to pafs fen- 
 
 3
 
 202 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fence till the matter of fact has been fettle^ 
 hy men nominated, we may almoft fay, at the 
 common choice of the parties (a) 3 ail private 
 views, and confequently all refpect of perfons, 
 are banifhed from the Courts of Juiiice. How- 
 ever, that nothing may be wanting which may 
 help to throw light on the fubject I have under* 
 taken to treat, 1 mall relate, in general, what is 
 the law in civil matters, that has taken place in 
 England. 
 
 When the Pandects were found at Amalphi, 
 the Clcrey, who were then the onlv Men that 
 were able to understand them, did not neglect 
 that opportunity of increasing the influence 
 they had already obtained, and caufed them to 
 be received in the greater part of Europe. 
 England, which was deftined to have a Con- 
 stitution lb different from that of other States, 
 was to be farther diitinguifhed by its rejecting 
 the Roman Laws. 
 
 Under William the Conqueror, and his im- 
 mediate fucceflbrs, a multitude of foreign Ec- 
 clefiaftics flocked to the Court of England. 
 Their influence over the mind of the Sove- 
 reign, which, in the other States of Europe, as 
 
 [a) Owing to the extenfive right of challenging jurymen., 
 which is allowed to every perfon brought to his trial, 
 fcliojgh not ve:y frecpently ufed,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 103 
 
 they were then conftituted, might be con- 
 sidered as matter of no great importance, was 
 not fo in a Country where the Sovereign being 
 all-powerful, to obtain influence over him, was 
 to obtain power itfeif. The Englilli Nobility 
 law with the greateft jealoufy, Men of a con- 
 dition fo different from their own, veiled with 
 a power to the attacks of which they were im- 
 mediately expofed, and thought that they would 
 carry that power to the height, if they were 
 ever to adopt a fyftem of laws which thofe fame 
 men fought to introduce, and of which they 
 would necelTarily become both the depofitaries 
 and the interpreters. 
 
 It happened, therefore, by a fomewhat lin- 
 gular conjunction of circurpilances, that, to 
 the Roman laws, brought over to England by 
 Monks, the idea of eccleijaftical power became 
 affociated, in the fame manner as the idea of 
 regal Defpotifm became afterwards annexed 
 to the Religion of the fame Monks, when fa- 
 voured by Kings who endeavoured to eftablifh 
 an arbitrary government. The Nobility at 
 all times rejected thefe laws, even with a de- 
 gree of ill humour {a); and the ufurper Ste- 
 
 [a) The nobility, under the reign of Richard IT. 
 declared in the French language of thofe times " Puree 
 st que le rcialme d'Englcterre n'ttoit devant ces hcures. 
 
 Ha
 
 104 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 phen, whofe intereft it was to conciliate their 
 affections, went fo far as to prohibit the itudy 
 of them. 
 
 As the general djfpofition of things brought 
 about, as hath been above obfervcd, a fufficient 
 degree of intercourfe between the Nobility or 
 Gentry, and the People, the averlion to the 
 Roman Laws gradually fpread itfelf far and 
 wide; and thofe laws, to which their wifdom 
 in many cafes, and particularly their extenfive- 
 nefs, ought naturally to have procured admit- 
 tance when the Englifh laws themfelves were 
 as yet but in their infancy, experienced the 
 moft fteacy oppofition from the Lawyers, and 
 as thofe perfons who fought to introduce them, 
 frequently renewed their attempts, there at 
 length arofe a kind of general combination 
 amongft the Laity, to confine them to Univer- 
 fities and Monafteries (#). 
 
 <c ne a Penitent du Roy notre Seignicr, k Seigniors dy; 
 " Parlement, unques ne fera, rule ne governe par la ley 
 " civil." viz. Inafmuch as the Kingdom of England was 
 not before this time, nor according to the intent of the 
 King our Lord, and Lords of Parliament, ever mall be 
 ruled or governed by the civil law In Rich. Parlamento 
 Weftmonafterii, Feb. 3. A?ino 2. 
 
 {a) It might perhaps be (hewn, if it belonged to the 
 fubjeft, that the liberty of thinking in religious mat- 
 ters, which has at all times remarkably prevailed in Eng- 
 land, is owing to much the fame caufes as its political
 
 OF ENGLAND. 105 
 
 This oppofition was carried fa far, that For- 
 tefcue, Chief Juftice of the King^s Bench, and 
 afterwards Chancellor under Henry VI. wrote 
 a Book intitled De Laudibus Legum Anglic, in 
 which he propofes to dcmonftrate the fupe- 
 riority of the Englifh laws over the Civil; 
 and that nothing might be wanting in his ali- 
 gnments on that fubject, he gives them the ad- 
 vantage of fuperior antiquity, and traces their 
 origin to a period much anterior to the foun- 
 dation of Rome. 
 
 This fpirit has been preferved even to much 
 more modern times j and when we perufe the 
 many paragraphs which Judge Hale has 
 
 liberty: both perhaps are owing to this, that the fame 
 Men, who. '} intereit it is in other Countries that the 
 people fhould be influenced by prejudices of a politi- 
 cal or religious kind, have been in England forced to 
 inform and unite with them. I fhall here take occa- 
 fion to obferve, in anfwer to the reproach maJe to the 
 English, by Prefident Henault, in his much adeemed 
 Chronological Hiftory of France, that the frequent 
 changes of religion which have taken place in Eng- 
 land, do not argue any fervile difpofition in the people; 
 they only prove the equilibrium between the then exit- 
 ing Seels : there was none but what might become the 
 prevailing one, whenever the Sovereign thought proper 
 to declaie for it; and it was not England, as people may 
 think at firft fight, it was only its Government, which 
 charged its religion.
 
 e 
 
 jo6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 written in his Hiftory of the Common Law, 
 to prove, that in the few cafes in which the 
 Civil Law is admitted in England, it can have 
 no power by virtue of any deference due to th 
 orders of Juflinian (a truth which certainly 
 had no need of proof), we plainly fee that this 
 Chief Jufcice, who was alio a very great Law- 
 yer, had, in this refpect, retained fomewhat of 
 the heat of party. 
 
 Even at pre lent the Engliili Lawyers at- 
 tribute the liberty they enjoy, and of which 
 Other Nations are deprived, to their having 
 rejected, while thofe Nations have admittedj 
 the 'Roman law; which is miftaking the effect 
 for the caufe. It is not becaufe the Engliili 
 have rejected the Roman laws that they are 
 free; but it is becaufe they were free, or at 
 leail becaufe there exifted among them 
 caufes which were, in procefs of time, to 
 make them (o, that they have been able to 
 rejeel: the Roman laws, But even though 
 thev had admitted thofe laws, the fame cir- 
 cumilanccs that have enabled them to reject 
 the whole, would have likewifc enabled them 
 to rejeel: thofe parts which might not have 
 iuited them; and they would have feen, that 
 jt is very pofiiblc to receive the decifions oi 
 the Civil law on the fubject of the fa --vitutes v.r-
 
 OF ENGLAND ( 107 
 
 latia & rvjiica, without adopting its principles 
 with refpedt to the power of the Emperors (a). 
 
 Of this the Republic of Holland, where the 
 Civil law is adopted, would afford a proof, if 
 there were not the ftill more {lriking one, of 
 the Emperor of Germany, who, though in the 
 opinion of his People, he is the fucceflbr to the 
 very throne of the Cttfars (b), has not by a 
 great deal fo much power as a King of Eng- 
 land ; and the reading of the feveral treaties 
 which deprived him of the power of nominating 
 the principal offices of the Empire, fufHciently 
 fhews that a fpirit of unlimited fubmiffion to 
 Monarchical power, is no necefTary confequence 
 of the admiflion of the Roman Civil Law. 
 
 The Laws therefore that have taken place in 
 England, are what they call the Unwritten Law., 
 alio termed the Common Law, and the Statute Lazv. 
 
 The Unwritten Luzv is thus called, not be- 
 caufe it is only tranfmitted by tradition from 
 generation to generation ; but becaufe it is not 
 founded on any known act of the Legislature. 
 It receives its force from immemorial cuftom, 
 and, for the moll parr, derives its origin from 
 
 (a) What particularly frightens the Englifh Lawyers is 
 
 L. i. Lib. I. Tit. 4. Dig. Quod Pri?:dpi placuerit legh 
 
 babet migorcm. 
 
 {b) The German word to exprefs the Emperor's dig- 
 nity, is, Co-far, Kaifer, 3
 
 jc8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Acts of Parliament enacted in the times which 
 immediately followed the Conqueft (particu- 
 larly thofe anterior to the time of Richard the 
 Firft), the originals of which are loft. 
 
 The principal objects fettled by the Com- 
 mon Law, are the rules of defcent, the dif- 
 ferent methods of acquiring property, the va- 
 rious forms required for rendering contracts 
 valid ; in all which points it differs, more or lefs, 
 from the Civil Law. Thus, by the Common 
 l^aw, lands defcend to the deleft fon, to the ex- 
 clufion of all his brothers and fitters; whereas, 
 by the Civil Law, they are equally divided 
 between all the children: by the Common Law, 
 property is transferred by writing; but by the 
 Civil Law, tradiricn, or actual delivery, is more- 
 over re qui lite, &c. 
 
 The fource from which the decifions of the 
 Common Law are drawn, is what is called 
 praterltorum memoria e-ventorum, and is found 
 in the collection of judgments that have been 
 paffed from time immemorial, and which, as 
 well as the proceedings relative to them, arc 
 carefully preferved under the title of Records. 
 In order that the principles eftablifhed by fuch 
 a feries of judgments may be known, extracts 
 from them are, from time to time, published 
 under the name of Reports; and thefe re
 
 OF ENGLAND* 109 
 
 ports reach, by a regular feries, fo far back 
 as the reign of Edward the Second, inclu- 
 sively. 
 
 Befides this collection^ which is pretty vo- 
 luminous, there are alfo fome ancient Authors 
 of great authority among Lawyers; fuch as 
 Glanvily who wrote under the reign of Henry 
 the Second Brafton, who wrote under Henry 
 the Third, Fleta, and Lytteltcm Among 
 more modern Authors, is Sir Edward Coke, 
 Lord Chief Juftice of the King's Bench under 
 James the Firit, who has written four books of 
 Inftitutes, and is at prefent the Oracle of the 
 Common Law. 
 
 The Common Law moreover comprehends 
 fome particular cufloms, which are fragments 
 of rhe ancient Saxon laws, cfcaped from the 
 difafter of the Conquefl; fuch as that called 
 Gavelkind, in the County of Kent, by which 
 lands are divided equally between the Sons; 
 and that called Borough EngHfB, by which, in 
 fome particular diftricts, lands defcend to the 
 youngeft Son. 
 
 The Civil Law, in the few inftances where 
 it is admitted, is like wife comprehended under 
 the Unwritten Law, becaufc it is of force only 
 fo far as it has been authorifed by immemo- 
 rial cultom. Some of its principles are fol-
 
 no THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 lowed in the Ecclefiailical Courts, in the Couf t$ 
 of Admiralty, and in the Courts of the two 
 Univerfities ; but it is there nothing more than 
 lex fub lege graviori ; and thefe different Courts 
 muft conform to Acts of Parliament, and to the 
 fenfe given to them by the Courts of Common 
 Law; being moreover fubjected to the controul 
 of thefe latter. 
 
 Laftly, the Written Law is the collection of 
 the various Acts of Parliament, the originals 
 of which are carefully preferved, efpecially fince 
 the reign of Edward the Third. Without en- 
 tering into the diftinctions made by Lawyers 
 with refpedt to them, fuch as public and private 
 Acts, declaratory Acts, or fuch as are made to 
 extend or reftrain the Common Law, it will be 
 fufficient to obferve, that being the refult of 
 the united wills of the Three Coniiituent Parts 
 of the Legislature, they, in all cafes, fupercede 
 both the Common Law and all former Sta- 
 tutes, and the Judges muft take cognizance of 
 them, and decide in conformity to them, even 
 though they had not been alledged by ths 
 parties (a). 
 
 The different Courts for the Adminiftratioa 
 of Juflice, in England, are 
 
 (a) Unlefs they bs private Acb.
 
 OF ENGLAND. uf 
 
 I. The Court of Common Pleas. It formerly 
 made a part of the Aula Regis; but as this lat- 
 ter Court was bound by its inftitution always 
 to follow the perfon of the King, and private 
 individuals experienced great difficulties in ob- 
 taining relief from a Court that was ambula- 
 tory, and always in motion, it was made one of 
 the articles of the Great Charter, that the Court 
 of Common Pleas mould thenceforwards be 
 held in a fixed place (a); and fince that time it 
 has been feated at Weftminfter. It is compofed 
 of a Lord Chief Juftice, with three other 
 Judges; and appeals from its judgments, ufually 
 called Writs of Errour, are brought before the 
 Court of King's Bench. 
 
 II. The Court of Exchequer. It was ori- 
 ginally eitablifhed to determine thofe caufes in 
 which the King, or his fervants, or accomptants, 
 were concerned, and has gradually become 
 open to all perfons. The confining the power 
 of this Court to the above clafs of perfons, 
 is therefore now a mere fiction; only a man 
 muft, for form's fake, fet forth in his decla- 
 ration that he is debtor to the King, whether 
 he be fo, or no. The Court of Exchequer is 
 
 (a) Commuma Placita non fequantur Curiam nof.ram, fed 
 ttmantur in a/iquo loco certo. Magna Charta, cap. u.
 
 ii2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 compofed of the Chief Baron of the Exche- 
 quer, and three other Judges. 
 
 III. The Court of King's Bench form9 that 
 part of the Aula Regis which continued to fub- 
 fift after the difmembering of the Common 
 Pleas. This Court enjoys the moil extenfive 
 authority of all other Courts : it has the fuper- 
 intendcnce over all Corporations, and keeps the 
 various jurifdiclions in the Kingdom within 
 their refpediive bounds. It takes cognizance, 
 according to the end of its original inflitution, 
 of all criminal caufes, and even of many caufes 
 merely civil. It is compofed of the Lord Chief 
 Juftice of the Court of King's Bench, and three 
 other Judges. Writs of errour againft the judg- 
 ments palled in that Court in civil matters, arc- 
 brought before the Court of the Exchequer 
 Chamber; or, in moll cafes, before the Houfe 
 of Peers. 
 
 IV. The Court of the Exchequer Chamber. 
 When this Court is formed by the four Barons, 
 or Judges of the Exchequer, together with the 
 Chancellor and Treafurer of the fame, it fits as 
 a Court of Equity; a kind of inftitution on 
 which fomc obfervations will be introduced in a 
 following Chapter. When this Court is form- 
 ed by the twelve Judges, to whom fometimes 
 the Lord Chancellor is joined, its office is to
 
 OFENGLAND. tij 
 
 deliberate, when properly referred and applied 
 to, and give an opinion on important and dif- 
 ficult caufes, before judgments are paffed upon, 
 them, in thdfe Courts where the caufes are de- 
 pending. 
 
 CHAP, X, 
 
 On the Law in regard to Civil Matter s } that is 
 obferved in England; 
 
 CONCERNING the manner in which 
 Juftice is adminiitered, in civil matters, 
 in England, and the kind of law that obtains 
 in that refpedt., the following obfervations may- 
 be made. 
 
 In the firft place, it is to be obferved, that 
 the beginning of a civil procefs in England^ 
 and the firft ftcp ufually taken in bringing an 
 action, is the feising by public authority the 
 perfon againft whom that action is brought. 
 This is done with a view to fecure fuch per- 
 forms appearance before a Judge, or at leaft 
 make him give fureties for that purpofe. In 
 mod of the Countries of Europe, where the 
 forms introduced in the Roman Civil Law, in 
 the reigns of the latter Emperors, have been 
 imitated* a different method has been adopted 
 
 I
 
 fi 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 to procure a man's appearance before a Court 
 of Juflice. The ufual practice is to have the 
 perfon fucd, fummoned to appear before the 
 Court, by a public officer belonging to it, 
 a week before-hand : if no regard is paid to 
 fuch fummons twice repeated, the Plaintiff, or 
 his Attorney, is admitted to make before the 
 Court a formal reading of his demand, which 
 is then granted him, and he may proeeed to 
 execution (a). 
 
 In this mode of proceeding, it is taken for 
 granted, that a perfon who declines to appear 
 before a Judge, to anfwer the demand of an- 
 other, after being properly fummoned, ac- 
 knowledges the juftice of inch demand ; and 
 this fuppofition is very juft and rational. 
 However, the above mentioned practice of 
 fecuring before-hand the body of a perfon fucd, 
 though not fo mild in its execution as that jufl 
 now defcribed, nor even more effectual, ap- 
 pears more obvious, and is more readily adopt- 
 ed, in thofe times when Courts of Law begin 
 
 (a) A perfon againft whom a judgment of this 
 kind has been pafied (which they call in France un 
 jugement par difaut) may eafily obtain relief: but as he 
 now in his turn becomes in a manner the Plaintiff, his 
 deferring the caufe, in this fecund ftage of it, would 
 leave him without remedy.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 115 
 
 to be formed in a Nation, and rules of diftri- 
 butive juftice to be eflablifhed; and it is, very 
 likely, followed in England as a continuation of 
 the methods that were adopted when the Eng- 
 lifh laws were as yet in their infancy. 
 
 In the times we mention, when laws be- 
 gin to be formed in a Country, the admini- 
 flration of juftice between individuals is com- 
 monly lodged in the fame hands which are in- 
 trufted with the public and military authority 
 in the State. Judges inverted with a power of 
 this kind, like to carry on their operations with 
 a high hand : they conlider the refufal of a 
 Man to appear before them, not as being barely 
 an expedient to avoid doing that which is juft, 
 but as a contempt of their authority : they of 
 courfe look upon themfelves as being bound to 
 vindicate it ; and a writ of Capias is fpcedily 
 ifTued to apprehend the refradtory Defendant. 
 A preliminary Writ, or order, of this kind, 
 becomes in time to be ufed of courfe, and as 
 the firft regular flcp of a law-fuit ; and thus, it 
 is likely enough, has it happened that in the 
 Englifh Courts of law, if I am rightly inform- 
 ed, a Writ of Capias is either iflued before the 
 original Writ itfelf (which contains the fum- 
 mons of the plaintiff, and a formal delineation 
 of his cafe), or is joined to fuch Writ, by mea-r.s 
 
 I 2
 
 1x6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 of an ac etiam capias, and is ferved along with 
 it. It may be remembered that, in England, 
 the Aula Regis at the head of which the King 
 himfelf prefided, was originally the common 
 Court of Juftice for the whole Kingdom, in 
 civil as well as criminal matters, and continued 
 fo till the court of Common Pleas was in time 
 feparated from it. 
 
 In Rome, where the diftribution of civil 
 Juftice was at fir ft lodged in the hands of the 
 Kings, and afterwards of the Confuls, the 
 method of feizing the perfon of a Man againft 
 whom a demand of any kind was preferred, 
 previouily to any judgment being palTed 
 againft him, was likewife adopted, and con- 
 tinued to be followed after the inftitution of 
 the Praetor's Court, to whom the civil branch 
 of the power of the Confuls was afterwards 
 delegated ; and it lafted till very late times ; 
 that is, till the times when thofe capital al- 
 terations were made in the Roman civil Law, 
 during the reign of the latter Emperors, which 
 gave it the form it now has in thofe Codes 
 or collections of which we are in pofTeffion. 
 
 A very lingular degree of violence even 
 took place in Rome, in the method ufed to fe- 
 cure the perfons of thofe againft whom a legal 
 demand was preferred. In England, the wav 
 
 6
 
 OF ENGLAND. 117 
 
 to feize upon the perfon of a Man under fuch 
 circumftances, is by means of a public Officer, 
 fupplied with a Writ or order for that purpofe, 
 fuppofed to be directed to him (or to the Sheriff 
 his employer) from the King himfelf. But 
 in Rome, every one became a kind of public 
 officer in his own caufe, to affert the Prsetor's 
 prerogative; and, without any oftenfible legal 
 licence or badge of public authority, had a 
 right to feize by force the perfon of his op- 
 ponent, wherever he met him. The practice 
 was, that the Plaintiff (ARor) firft fummoned 
 the perfon fued (Reum) with a loud voice, to 
 follow him before the Court of the Praetor (tf). 
 When the Defendant refufed to obey fuch 
 fummons, the Plaintiff, by means of the words 
 licet anteflari, requefted the by-ftanders to be 
 witneffes of the fact, as a remembrance of 
 which he touched the ears of each of them; 
 and then proceeded to feize the perfon of his 
 opponent, by throwing his arms round his neck 
 (obtorto collo), thus endeavouring to drag him 
 before the Praetor. When the perfon fued was, 
 through age or ficknefs, difabled from follow- 
 ing the Plaintiff, the latter was directed by the 
 law of the Twelve Tables to fupply him with 
 a horfe (jumentum dato). 
 
 [a] Ad Tribunal fsquere, in Iuj amhula. 
 
 I 7
 
 iz8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The above method of proceeding was how-' 
 ever in after-times mitigated, though very late 
 and flowly. In the firft place, it became unlaw- 
 ful to feize a man in his own houfe, as it was 
 the abode of his domeilic Gods. Women of 
 good family (Matron*) were in time protected 
 from the feverity of the above cuftom, and 
 they could no longer be dragged by force be- 
 fore the Tribunal of the Prjetor, The me- 
 thod of placing a lick or aged perfon by force 
 upon a horfe, feems to have been aboliftied 
 during the latter times of the Republic. 
 Emancipated Sons, and freed Slaves, were 
 afterwards retrained from fummoning their 
 Parents, or late Mailers, without haying ex- 
 prefsly obtained the Praetor's leave, under the 
 penalty of fifty pieces of gold. However, fo 
 late as the time of Pliny, the old mode of fum- 
 moning, or carrying by force, before a Judge, 
 continued in general to fubfift ; though, in the 
 time of Ulpian, the necefllty of exprefsly obtain- 
 ing the Praetor's leave was extended to all cafes 
 and perfons ; and in Conftantine's reign, the 
 method began to be eftablifned of having; legal 
 
 CD O O 
 
 iummonfes' ferved only by means of a public 
 Officer appointed for that purpofe. After that 
 time, other changes in the former law were in- 
 troduced., from which the mode of proceeding
 
 OF ENGLAND. 119 
 
 dow ufed on the Continent of Europe, has been 
 borrowed. 
 
 In England likewife, fome changes we may 
 cbferve, have been wrought in the law and 
 practice concerning the arrefts of fued perfons, 
 though as flowly and late as thofe effected in 
 the Roman Republic or Empire, if not more 
 fo ; which evinces the great impediments of 
 various kinds that obftru.cjt the improvement of 
 laws in every Nation. So late as the reign of 
 king George the Firft, an Act was palled to 
 prohibit the practice of previous perfonal Ar- 
 reft, in cafes of demands under two pounds 
 fterling ; and iince that time, thofe Courts, 
 juftly called of Confcience, have been eftablifhed, 
 in which fuch demands are to be fummarily 
 decided, and fimple fummonfes, without arreft, 
 can only be ufed. A n d lately, another Bill has 
 been palTed on the motion of Lord Beauchamp, 
 whefe name deferves to be recorded, by which 
 the like prohibition Qf arreft is extended to 
 all cafes of debt under ten pounds fterling ; 
 a Bill the palling of which was of twenty, 
 or even a hundred times, more real impor- 
 tance than the rife or fall of a favourite or 3 
 Miniiter, thpugh it has perhaps been ho- 
 noured with a.lefs degree of attention by th? 
 Public, 
 
 Ia
 
 no THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Another peculiarity of the Englilh Civil Law x 
 is the great refinements, formalities, and ftrift- 
 nefs that prevail in it. Concerning fuch re- 
 finements, which are rather imperfections, the 
 fame obfervation may be made that has been 
 introduced above in regard to the mode and 
 frequency of civil arrefl in England ; which is, 
 that they are continuations of methods adopted 
 when the Englifh Law began to be formed, 
 and are the confequences of the iituation in 
 which the Englilh placed themfelves when 
 they rejected the ready made Code of the Ro- 
 man civil Law, compiled by order of Juftinian, 
 which molt Nations of Europe have admitted, 
 and rather chofe to become their own Law* 
 makers, and raife from the ground the ftruc- 
 ture of their own national Civil Code; which 
 Code, it may be obferved, is as yet in the firil 
 ftage of its formation, as the Roman Law itfelf 
 was during the times of the Republic, and in 
 the reigns of the firft Emperors. 
 
 The time at which the power of adminifter- 
 ing juftice to individuals, becomes feparated 
 from the military power (an event which hap- 
 pens fooner or later in different Countries) is 
 the real asra of the origin of a regular fyitem 
 of laws in a Nation. Judges being now de- 
 prived of the power of the fword, or, which
 
 OF ENGLAND, iai 
 
 amounts to the fame, being obliged to borrow 
 that power from other perfons, endeavour to 
 find their refources within their own Courts, 
 and, if poffible, to obtain fubmiffion to their 
 decrees from the great regularity of their pro- 
 ceedings, and the reputation of the impartiality 
 of their decisions. 
 
 At the fame time alfo, Lawyers begin to 
 croud in numbers to Courts which it is no 
 longer dangerous to approach, and add their 
 refinements to the rules already fet down either 
 by the Legiflature or the Judges. As the em- 
 ploying of them is, efpecially in the begin- 
 ning, matter of choice, and they fear, that, 
 if bare common fenfe were thought fuffi- 
 cient to conduct a law-fuit, every body might 
 imagine he knows as much as they do, they 
 contrive difficulties to make their afliftance 
 needful. As the true fcience of the Law, 
 which is no other than the knowledge of a long 
 feries of former rules and precedents, cannot 
 as yet exift, they endeavour to create an artifi- 
 cial one to recommend themfelves by. Formal 
 diilin&ions and definitions are invented to ex- 
 prefs the different kinds of claims Men may 
 fet up again ft one another; in which almoft 
 the fame nicety is difplayed as that ufed by 
 Philofophers in claffing the different fubjedts,
 
 m THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 or kingdoms, of natural Hiitory. Settled forms 
 of words, under the name of Writs, or fuch like, 
 are deviled to fet thofe claims forth ; and, like 
 introductory pafles, ferve to ufher Claimants 
 into the Temple of Juftice. For fear their 
 Clients mould defert them after their firft in- 
 traduction, like a fick man who refts contented 
 With a Tingle vifit of the Phyfician, Lawyers 
 contrive other ceremonies and technichai forms 
 for the farther conduct of the procefs and the 
 pleadings; and in order ftill more fafely to bind 
 their Clients to their dominion, they at length 
 obtain to make every error relating to their 
 profeffional regulations, whether it be a mif~ 
 nomer, a mispleading, or fuch like tranfgreflion, 
 to be of: 33 fatal a confequence as a failure 
 againft the laws of ftridt Juftice. Upon the 
 foundation of the above mentioned definitions 
 and metaphyfical distinctions of cafes and ac- 
 tions, a number of ftridt rules of law are 
 moreover railed, with which none can be ac- 
 quainted but fuch as are complete mailers of 
 thpfe diftin&ions and definitions. 
 
 Tq a perfon who in a pofterior age obferves 
 for the firft time fuch refinements in the distri- 
 bution of Juftice, they appear very ftrangCj 
 and even ridiculous. Yet, it muft be confefledj 
 that during the times of the firft inftitution ci
 
 G F ENGLAND. n$ 
 
 MagifVaeies and Courts of a civil nature, ce- 
 remonies and formalities of different kinds, 
 are very ufeful to procure to fuch Courts, both, 
 the confidence of thofe perfons wjio are brought 
 before them, and the refpect of the Public at 
 large ; and they thereby become actual fub- 
 ftitutes for military force, which, till then, 
 had been the chief fuppcrt of Judges. Thofe 
 fame forms ana profeffional regulations arc 
 moreover ufeful to give uniformity to the 
 proceedings of the Lawyers and pf the Courts 
 of Law, and to infure conftancy and fteadinefs 
 to the rules they fet down among themfelves. 
 And if the whole fyflem of the refinements vvc 
 mention continues to fubfifl in very remote 
 ages, it is in a great meafurp owing (not to 
 mention other cauft s) to their having fo co- 
 alefced with the efTential parts of the Law as 
 to make danger, or at leait great difficulties, to 
 be apprehended from a feparation ; and they 
 may, in that refpecl:, be compared with a fcaf- 
 folding ufed in t-he raiftng of a houfe, which, 
 though only intended to fet the materials and 
 fupport the builders, happens to be fuffered 
 for a long time afterwards to fland, becaufe it 
 js thought the removing of it might endanger 
 the building,
 
 J24 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Very Angular law formalities and refined 
 practices of the kind here alluded to, had 
 been contrived by the firffc Jurifconfuks in 
 Rome, with a view to amplify the rules fet 
 down in the Laws of the Twelve Tables ; 
 which being but few, and engraved on brafs, 
 every body could know as well as they : it 
 even was a general cuftom to give thofe laws 
 to children to learn, as we are informed by 
 Cicero. 
 
 Very accurate definitions, as well as diftindt 
 branches of cafes and actions, were contrived 
 by the firft Roman Jurifconfuks; and when a 
 Man had once made his election of that pecu- 
 liar kind of aSiioH he chofe to purfue his claim 
 by, it became out of his power to alter it. 
 Settled forms of words, called Aciiones legis, 
 were moreover contrived, which Men mult 
 abfolutely ufe to fet forth their demands. The 
 party himfelf was to recite the appointed 
 words before the Pra?tor; and mould he un- 
 fortunately happen to mifs or add a iingle 
 word, fo as to feem to alter his real cafe or 
 demand, he loft his fuit thereby. To this 
 an allufion is made by Cicero, when he fays, 
 We have a civil law fo conftituted, that a 
 " Man becomes non-fuited, who has not 
 " proceeded in the manner he fhould have
 
 OF ENGLAND, 125 
 
 " done {a).** An obfervation of the like na- 
 ture is alfo to be found in Quintilian, whofe 
 expreffions on the fubjectare as follow: " There 
 " is beiides another danger; for if but one 
 tc word has been miftaken, we are to be con- 
 " fidered as having failed in every point of our 
 '* fuit ()." Similar folemnities and appropri- 
 ated forms of words were moreover necefiary 
 to introduce the reciprocal anfvvers and replies 
 of the Parties, to require and accept fureties, 
 to produce witneffes, &c. 
 
 Of the above Aftiones legis, the Roman Jurif- 
 confults and Pontiffs had carefully kept the 
 exclufive knowledge to themfelves, as well a* 
 of thofe Days on which religion did not allow 
 Courts of law to fit (<). One Cn. Flavius, fe- 
 cretary to Appius Claudius, having happened 
 to divulge the fecret of thofe momentous forms 
 (an act for which he was afterwards preferred 
 by the People), Jurifconfults contrived frefh 
 ones, which they began to keep written with 
 fecret cyphers; but a Member of their own 
 Body again betrayed them, and the new Col- 
 lection which he publilhed, was called Ins 
 
 (a) Ita Lis civile haltmus conftitutum, ut caufa cadat is 
 qui not: quomadmodum ofortet egerit. De Invent II. 19. 
 
 (b) Eft etiam periculofum, quum ft una *verbo fit erratum,, 
 tot a caufd cectdijfe <videami(r. In ft. Orat, III. 8. VI L 3. 
 
 (b) Die: Fafti & Nefa/Ii,
 
 126 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 &llanum> from his name, Sex. JElius, in trre 
 fame manner as the former collection had been 
 called, Ius Flavianum* However, it does not 
 icem that the influence of Lawyers became much 
 abridged bv thofe two Collections : befides wriN 
 ten information of that fort, practice is alfo ne- 
 ccfTary : and the public Collections we mention, 
 like the many books that have been published 
 on the Engliih law, could hardly enable a Man 
 to become a Lawyer, at lean: fufficiently fo as 
 to conduct a law-fult (a). 
 
 Modern Civilians have been at uncommon 
 pains to find out and produce the ancient law 
 formula we mention ; in which they really have 
 had furprifing fuceefs. Old Comic Writers, 
 fuch as Plautus and Terence, have fupplicd 
 them with feveral ; the fettled words, for in- 
 stance, ufed to claim the property of a Slave, 
 lrequently occur in their Works (!?). 
 
 (a) The Roman Jurifconfults had extended their kill tt> 
 objects of -voluntary jurifdiclion as well as to thofe of con- 
 tentious jurifdiclion, and had devifed peculiar formalities, 
 forms of words, dillinflions, and definitions, in regard to 
 the contracting of obligations between Man and Man, in 
 regard to ftipulations, donations, fpoufals, and efpecially 
 Iai\ wills, in regard to all which they had difplayed furprif- 
 ing nicety, refinement, accuracy, and ftridtnefs. The 
 Englifh Lawyers have not bellowed fo much pains on the 
 cbjetts of voluntary jurifdiclion, nor any thing like it. 
 
 () The words addrefled to the Plaintiffs by the perfon 
 fued, when the latter made his appearance on the day for 
 which he had been compelled to give furctics, were as fol-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 127 
 
 Extremely like the above Acfiones legis are 
 the Writs ufed in the Englifh Courts of law. 
 Thofe Writs are framed for, and adapted to, 
 every branch or denomination of actions, fuch. 
 
 low, and are alluded to by Plaut. CurcuL I. 3. v. 5. 
 ' Where art thou who haft obliged me to give fureties ? 
 " Where art thou who fummoneft me ? Here I ftand be- 
 " fore thee, do thyfelf ftand before me." To which 
 the Plaintiff made anfwer, " Here I am." The defendant 
 replied, What doft thou fay ?" When the plaintiff an- 
 fwered, I fay. . . {Aio) and then followed the form of 
 words by which he chofe to exprefs his aclion. Ubi-tu es, 
 qui me <vadatus es ? Vbi tu es qui me citajii ? Ecce ego me 
 iibififto ; tu contra iff te mihi fijle, Ztc. 
 
 If the aclion, for inftance, was brought on account of 
 goods ftolen, the fettled penalty or damages for which was 
 the reftitution of twice the value, the words to be ufed 
 were, AIO decern aureos mihi furto tue abejfe, teque ec nomine 
 viginti aureos mihi dare cportere. For work done, fuch as 
 cleaning of cloaths, &c. Alo te mihi tritici medium de qut, 
 inter nos, ccn-jtnit ob polita <vejlimenta tua, dare cportere. For 
 recovering the value of a Slave killed by another Citizen. 
 Aio te hominem m:um occidijfe, teque miki quantum i/Ie hoc anno 
 flurimi fuit dare cportere. For damages done by a vicious 
 animal, Aio boi'em Meevii fernjum rr.eum, Sticbum, coruu 
 fetiijfe Cif occidijfe, eoqiie nomine Mai'ium, cut fer-zi 
 ^Jiimationem prafiare, aut bovem mihi noxse dare, oportert ; 
 or Aio urfum Mamii mihi iiulnus intulijfe, & Mttvium 
 quantum aquius melius mihi dare oportere, iffc. iff c . 
 
 It may be obferved, that the particular kind of re 
 medy which was provided by the law for the cafe befor? 
 the Court, was exprefly pointed out in the formula, ufed 
 by a Plaintiff ; and in regard to this no miftake was to 
 bf made. Thus, in the laft quoted formula, the words 
 
 3
 
 128 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 as detinue, trefpafs, aBion upon the cafe, acccmpt, 
 and covenant, &c the fame itri&nefs obtains 
 in regard to them as did in regard to the Ro- 
 man law formula? above mentioned : there 
 is the fame danger in mifapplying them, or 
 in failing in any part of them; and to ufe 
 the words of an Engliih Law writer on the 
 fubjedt, " Writs mull be rightly directed, or 
 <c they will be nought, ... In all writs, care 
 < c mull be had that they be laid and formed 
 <c according to their cafe, and fo purlued in the 
 <c procefs thereof (V)." 
 
 The fame formality likewife prevails in the 
 Englifh pleadings and conduct of the procefs^ 
 as obtained in the old Roman law proceedings 
 and in the fame manner as the Roman Jurif- 
 confults had their Acllonls pojlulal'wnes Cff edi- 
 tiones, their inficiationes, exceptiones, fponJioneS} 
 replicationes, duplicaiiones, &c fo the Eng- 
 lifh Lawyers have their counts, bars^ rc~ 
 
 quantum aqulus melius, fhew that the Praetor was to ap- 
 point inferior Judges, both to afcertain the damage done 
 and determine finally upon the cafe, according to the di- 
 rection he previoufly gave them ; thefe words being ex- 
 clufively appropriated to the kind of Aftions called Arbl- 
 trari/e, from the above mentioned Judges or Arbitrators. 
 In actions brought to require the execution of conventions 
 that had no name, the convention itfelf was expreffed in 
 the formula ; fuch is that which is recited above, relating 
 to work done by the Plaintiff, &c. &c. 
 (<?) Jacob's Law Dictionary. See Writ,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 129 
 
 filiations, rejoinders, fur-rejoinders, rebutters, fur- 
 rebutters, &c. Afcrupulous accuracy in obferv- 
 ing certain rules, is moreover neceifary in the 
 management or thole pleadings: the following 
 are the words of an Engliih Law-writer on the 
 fubjecli iC Though the art and dexterity of 
 ."pleading, was in its nature and defign only 
 ec to render the fact plain and intelligible, and 
 " to bring the matter to judgment with con- 
 " venient certainty, it began to degenerate from 
 " its primitive fimplicity. Pleaders, yea and 
 (l fudges, having become too curious in that 
 tl refpedt, pleadings at length ended in a piece 
 " of nicety and curiofitv, bv which the mil- 
 Ci carriage of many a caufe, upon fmall trivial 
 " objections, has been occafioned (#)" 
 
 There is, however, a difference between the 
 Roman Jtt'icnes legis, and the Engliih Writs ; 
 which is, that the former might be framed 
 when new ones were neceifary, by the Pnetor 
 or Judge of the Court, or, in fome cafes, by 
 the body of the Jurifconfults themfelves, 
 whereas JVrits, when wanted for fuch new cafes 
 as may offer, can only be devifed by a diftincl: 
 Judge or Court, exclufively inverted with fuch 
 power, viz. the High Court of Chancery. 
 The iffuing of Writs already exifting, for the 
 different cafes to which they belong, is alfo ex- 
 
 (a) Cunningham': Luw Di&ionarv, See Pleadings. 
 
 K
 
 i 3 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 preily referved to this Court; and fo important 
 has its office on thofe two points been deemed 
 by Lawyers, that it has been called, by way of 
 eminence, the Manufactory of Juftice, (Officina 
 Jujlititf.) Original Writs befides, when once 
 framed, are not at any time to be altered, except 
 by Parliamentary authority (a). 
 
 Of fo much weight in the Englifti law, arc 
 the original delineations of cafes we mention, 
 that no caufe is fufTered to be proceeded upon, 
 unlefs they firft appear as legal introducers to 
 it. However important or interefting the cafe, 
 the Judge, till he fees the Writ he is ufed to, 
 or at leaft a Writ iflued from the right Manu- 
 factory, is both deaf and dumb. He is without 
 
 (c) Writs, legally iffued, are alfo neceffary for 
 executing the different incidental proceedings that may 
 take place in the courfe of a law fuit, fuch as producing 
 witnefles, &c. The names given to the different kindj 
 of writs, are ufually derived from the 'fir ft Latin words by 
 which they began when they were written in Latin, or a: 
 leaft from fome remarkable word in them; which give* 
 rife to expreflions fufficiently uncouth and unintelligible. 
 Thus, a Pone, is a writ iffued to oblige a perfon in certain 
 cafes to give fureties [Pone per 'vadium, and faliios pUgios.) 
 A writ of Subpoena is to oblige witneffes, and fometimes 
 other claffes of perfons, to appear before a Court. An 
 action of Qui tarn, is that which is brought to fue for a 
 proportional fhare of a fine eftablifhed by fome penal Sta- 
 tute, by the perfon who laid an information : the words 
 in the writ being, Qui tam pro Domino rege, quam profeip/t 
 in bac fsrtt feqvitur, &C. &C,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 131 
 
 Cyes to fee, or ears to hear. And, when a cafe 
 of a new kind offers, for which there is as yet 
 no Writ in being, fhould the Lord Chancellor 
 and Mafters in Chancery difagree in creating 
 one, or prove unequal to the arduous talk, the 
 Great National Council^ that is Parliament 
 themfelves, are in fuch emergency exprefsly 
 applied to : by means of their collected wifdom, 
 the right myflical words are brought together ' 
 the Judge is reftored to the free ufe of his organs 
 of hearing and of fpeech ; andj by the creation 
 of a new Writ, a new province is added to the 
 Empire of the Courts of Law 4 
 
 In fine, thofe precious Writs, thofe valuable 
 Briefs (Brevia) as they are alfo called by 
 way of eminence, which are the elixir and 
 quintefTence of the Law, have been committed 
 to the fpecial care of Officers appointed for that 
 purpofe, whofe offices derive their names from 
 thofe peculiar inftruments they refpectively ufe 
 for the prefervation of the depofit with which 
 they are intrufced ; the one being called the 
 office of the Hamper, and the other, of the Small 
 bag (a). 
 
 To fay the truth, however, the creating of 
 a new Writ^ upon any new given cafe, is mat- 
 
 fa} Hanaperium & Parya haga the Hanaper Office, 
 and the Petty-bag Office: the above two Latin words,- 
 it is not improper to obfeive, do not occur in Tally's 
 
 K %
 
 132 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 tcr of more difficulty than the generality of 
 Readers are aware of. The very importance 
 which is thought to be in thofe profeffional 
 forms of words, renders them realty important. 
 As every thing without them is illegal in a 
 Court of Common Law, fo with them every 
 thing becomes legal, that is to fay, they em- 
 power the Court legally to determine upon 
 every kind of fuit to which they are made to 
 ferve as introducftors. The creating of a new 
 Writ, therefore, amounts in its confequences 
 to the framing of a new law, and a law of a 
 general nature too : now, the creating of fuch 
 a law, on the firft appearance of a new cafe, 
 which law is afterwards to be applied to all 
 fuch cafes as may be fimilar to the firft, is really 
 matter of difficulty; efpeciaily, when men are 
 as yet in the dark as to the belt kind of provi- 
 fion to be made for the cafe in queftion, or even 
 when it is not perhaps yet known whether it be 
 proper to make any provifion at all. The fram- 
 ing of a new Writ under fuch circumftances, is 
 a mcafure on which Lawyers or Judges will not 
 very willingly either venture of themfelves, or 
 apply to the Legillature for that purpoR.*. 
 
 works. To the care of the Petty-bag office thofe writs 
 are trufted in which the King's bufinefs is concerned: 
 ard to the Hanaper cilice, thofe which relate to the Subject.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 133 
 
 Owing to the above mentioned real difficulty 
 in creating new Writs on the one hand, and to 
 the abfolute neceffity of fuch Writs in the 
 Courts of Common Law on the other, many 
 new fpecies of claims and cafes (the ariiing of 
 which is from time to time the unavoidable con- 
 fequenees of the progrefs of trade and civiliza- 
 tion) are left unprovided for, and remain like 
 fo many vacant fpaces in the Law, or rather, 
 like io many inacccfllble fpots, which the laws 
 in being cannot reach: now this is a great im- 
 perfection in the diflribution of Juftice, which 
 mould be open to every individual, and provide 
 remedies for every kind of claim which Men 
 may fet up againit one another. 
 
 To remedy the above inconvenience, or ra- 
 ther in fome degree to palliate it, law fictions 
 have been reforted to, in the Englifh law, by 
 which Writs, being warped from their actual 
 meaning, are made to extend to cafes to which 
 they in no fhape belong. 
 
 Law fictions of the kind we mention were not 
 unknown to the old Roman Jurifconfults; and 
 as an inftance of their ingenuity in that refpect, 
 may be mentioned that kind of action, in which 
 a Daughter was called a Son (a). Several in- 
 
 (<?) From the above inftance it might be concluded 
 that the Roman Jurifconfults were pofTefTed of ftill 
 
 K. z
 
 134 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fiances might alfo be quoted of the fictitious 
 ufe of Writs in the Englifh Courts of Common 
 Law. A very remarkable expedient of that 
 fort occurs in the method generally ufed to fue 
 for the payment of certain kinds of debt, be- 
 fore the Court of Common Pleas, fuch, if I am 
 not miftakcn, as a falary for work done, in- 
 demnity for fulfilling orders received, he. The 
 Writ iffued in thofe cafes, is grounded on the 
 fuppofition, that the perfon fued has trefpaffed 
 on the ground of the Plaintiff, and broken by 
 force of arms through his fences and inclo- 
 fures ; and under this predicament the Defen- 
 dant is brought before the Court : this Writ, 
 which has been that which Lawyers have found 
 of moft convenient ufe, to introduce before a 
 Court of Common Law the kinds of claim 
 we mention, is called in technical language a 
 
 Claufum f regit. In order to bring a perfon 
 
 before the Court of King's Bench, to anfwer 
 demands of much the fame nature with thofe a- 
 bove, a Writ, called a Latitat, is iffued, in which 
 it is taken fcr granred that the Defendant in- 
 (idiouily conceals himfelf., and is lurking in 
 
 greater power than the Englifh Parliament; for it is z 
 fundamental principle with the Englifh Lawyers, that 
 Parliament can do every thing, except making a V/om;^ 
 t Man, or a Man a Woman,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 135 
 
 fome County, different from that in which the 
 Court is fitting ; the expreffions ufed in the 
 Writ being, that " he runs up and down and 
 " fecretes himfelf ;" though no fuch fact is fe- 
 rioufly meant to be advanced either by the At- 
 torney or the Party. 
 
 The fame principle of ftrict adherence to 
 certain forms long fince eftablifhed, has alfo 
 caufed Lawyers to introduce into their pro- 
 ceedings, fictitious names of perfons who are 
 fuppofed to difcharge the office of fureties ; 
 and in certain cafes, it feems, the name of a 
 fictitious perfon is introduced in a Writ along 
 with that of the principal Defendant, as be- 
 ing joined in a common caufe with him. An- 
 other inftance of the fame high regard of 
 Lawyers, and Judges too, for certain old forms, 
 which makes them more unwilling to depart 
 from fuch forms than from the truth itfelf of 
 facts, occurs in the above mentioned expedient 
 ufed to bring ordinary caufes before the Court 
 of Exchequer, in order to be tried there at 
 Common Law ; which is, by making a decla- 
 ration that the Plaintiff is a King's debtor, 
 though neither the Court, nor the Plaintiffs 
 Attorney, lay any ferious jftrefs on the affer* 
 tion (#). 
 
 (a) Another inftance of the Itrift adherence of the Eng- 
 lifh Lawyers to their old eftabliihed forms in preference 
 
 K 4
 
 u6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 CHAP. XI. 
 
 The Subject continued. The Courts of Equity. 
 
 HOWEVER, there are limits to the law 
 fictions and fubtilties we mention ; and 
 the remedies of the Law cannot by their means 
 be extended to all pomble cafes that arife, unlefs 
 too many abfurdities are differed to be accu- 
 mulated; nay, there have been inftances in 
 tvhich the improper application of Writs, in 
 the Courts of Law, has been checked by au- 
 thority. In order therefore to remedy the incon- 
 veniences we mention, that is, in order to ex- 
 tend the adminiftration of diflributive Juftice to 
 all poffible cafes, by freeing it from the profef- 
 fjonal difficulties that have gradually grown up 
 
 even to the truth of facts, occurs in the manner of execut- 
 ing the very Act mentioned in this Chapter, palled in the 
 reign of George I. for preventing perfonal Arreft for debts 
 under forty {hillings. If the defendant, after being per- 
 sonally ferved with a copy of the procei^, does not appear 
 on the appointed days, the method is to fuppofe that he 
 has actually made his appearance, and the caufe is pro- 
 ceeded upon according to this fuppofition : fictitious names 
 of bails are alio reforted to. 
 
 The inhabitants of Bengal, and other Eaft India pro- 
 vinces, have been prodigioufly furprifed, it is faid, at the 
 refinements, fictions, an J intricacy of ihe Englifh lav/, in 
 regard to civil matters which was introduced among them 
 a few years ago; and it is certainly net to be doubted that 
 tht-/ may have teen aonhl.cu\
 
 OF ENGLAND. 137 
 
 in its way, a new Kind of Courts has been in- 
 ftituted in England, called Courts of Equity, 
 
 The generality of people, mifled by this 
 word Equity, have conceived falfe notions of 
 the office of the Courts we mention ; and it 
 feems to be generally thought that the Judges 
 who fit in them, are only to follow the rules 
 of natural Equity; by which People appear 
 to underfland, that in a Court of Equity, the 
 Judge may follow the dictates of his own pri- 
 vate feelings, and ground his decisions as he 
 thinks proper, on the peculiar circumftances 
 and fituation of thofe perfons who make their 
 appearance before him. Nay, Doctor Johnfon, 
 in his abridged Dictionary, gives the following 
 definition of the power of the Court of Chan- 
 cery, confidered as a Court of Equity : " The 
 ii Chancellor hath power to moderate and tern- 
 fl per the written law, and fubjefteth himfelf 
 i( only to the law of nature and confidence;" 
 for which definition Dean Swift, and Cowell, 
 who was a Lawyer, are quoted as authorities. 
 Other inftances might be produced of Lawyers 
 who have been inaccurate in their definitions 
 of the true offices of the Judges of Equity. 
 And the above named Doctor himfelf is on no 
 fubjecl a defpicable authority. 
 
 Certainly the power of the Judges of Equity 
 cannot be to alter, by their own private power, 
 the Written Law, that is, Ads of Parlia-
 
 138 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ment, and thus to controul the Legiflaturc. 
 Their office only confifts, as will be proved in 
 the fequel, in providing remedies for thofe cafes 
 for which the public good requires that reme- 
 dies fnould be provided, and in regard to which 
 the Courts of Common Law, ffiackled by their 
 original forms and institutions, cannot procure 
 any ; or, in other words the Courts of Equity 
 have a power to adminirkr Juftice to indivi- 
 duals, unreftrained, not by the I y aw, but by 
 the profeflional law difficulties which Lawyers 
 have from time to time contrived in the Courts 
 of Common Law, and to which the Judges of 
 thofe Courts have given their fanction. 
 
 An office of the kind here mentioned, was 
 foon found necelfary in Rome, for reafons of 
 the fame nature with thofe above delineated. 
 For, it is remarkable enough, that the Body 
 of Englilh Lawyers, by refufing admittance 
 to the Code of Roman Laws, as it exitfed in 
 the latter times of the Empire, have only fub- 
 jec?ted themfelves to the fame difficulties undei 
 which the eld Roman jurifconfults laboured., 
 durm" the time they were raifin<r the ftructure 
 of thefe fame Laws. And it may alfo be ob- 
 ferved, that the Lngbih Lawyers or judges have 
 falkn upon much the fame expedients as thofe 
 which the Reman Juiifconfujts and Praetors had 
 adopted. 
 
 This office of a Judge of Equity, was in
 
 OF ENGLAND. 139 
 
 time afTumed by the Praetor in Rome, in ad- 
 dition to the judicial power he before poflerTed 
 (a). At the beginning of the year for which 
 he had been elected, the Praetor made a deck-* 
 ration of thofe remedies for new difficult cafes, 
 which he had determined to afford during the 
 time of his Magiftracy ; in the choice of which 
 he was no doubt directed, either by his own ob- 
 fervations, while out of office, on the propriety 
 of fuch remedies, or by the fuggeftions of expe- 
 rienced Lawyers on the fubjecl. This Decla- 
 ration (Ediftum) the Praetor produced in albo^ 
 as the expreffion was. Modern Civilians have 
 made many conjectures on the real meaning of 
 the above words ; one of their fuppofitions, 
 which is as likely to be true as any other, is, 
 that the Praetor's Ediflum, or heads of new law 
 remedies, were written on a whitened wall, by 
 the fide of his Tribunal. 
 
 Among the provisions made by the Roman 
 Praetors in their capacity of Judges of Equity, 
 may be mentioned thofe which they introduced 
 in favour of emancipated Sons and of relations 
 by the Women's fide (Cogniti), in regard to the 
 right of inheriting. Emancipated Sons were 
 
 (a) The Praetor thus poflefTed two diflin.fi branches 
 of judicial authority, in the fame manner as the Court 
 of Exchequer does in England, which occafionlly fits 
 as a Court of Common Law, and a Court of Equity,
 
 i 4 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fuppofed, by the Laws of the Twelves Tables, 
 to have ceafed to be the children of their Fa- 
 ther, and, as a confequence, a legal claim was 
 denied them on the paternal inheritance : Re- 
 lations by the Woman's -fide were taken no no- 
 tice of, in that article of the fame laws which 
 treated of the right of fucceflion, mention be- 
 ing only made of relations by the Men's fide 
 (Agnatl.) The former, the Praetor admitted, 
 by the Edict Unde Libert, to fhare their Father's 
 (or Grandfather's) inheritance along with their 
 brothers ; and the latter he put in pofTefiion of 
 the patrimony of a kinfman deceafed, by means 
 of the Edict Unde Cognati, when there were no 
 relations by the Men's fide. Thefe two kinds 
 of inheritance were not however called h<eredi- 
 tas, but only bonorum pqffefio ; thefe words being 
 very accurately diftinguifhed, though the effect 
 was in the iffue exactly the fame {a). 
 
 {a) As the power of Fathers, at Rome, was unbounded, 
 and lafted as long as their life, the emancipating of Sons 
 was a cafe that occurred frequently enough, either for 
 the fecurity or fatisfadtion, of thole who engaged in any 
 undertaking with them. The power of Fathers had been 
 carried fo far by the laws of Romulus, confirmed after- 
 wards by thofe of the Twelve Tables, that they might fell 
 their Sons for Haves as often as three times, if, after a 
 firft or fecond fale, they happened to acquire their liberty: 
 jt was only after being fold for the third time, and then
 
 OF ENGLAND. 141 
 
 In the fame manner, the "Laws of the Twelve 
 Tables had provided relief only for cafes of 
 theft; and no mention was made in them of 
 cafes of goods taken away by force (a deed 
 which was not looked upon in fo odious a light 
 at Rome as theft, which was confidered as the 
 peculiar guilt of flaves.) In procefs of time the 
 Prastor promifed relief to fuch perfons as might 
 have their goods taken from them by open 
 force, and gave them an action for the recoverv 
 of four times the value, againft thofe who had 
 committed the fact with an evil intention. Si 
 cut dolo malo bona rapt a efj'e dlccntur, ei in quadra- 
 plum Judicium dabo. 
 
 Again, neither the Law of the Twelve Ta- 
 bles, nor the Laws made afterwards in the Af- 
 femblies of the People, had provided remedies 
 
 becoming again free, that Sons could be entirely releafed 
 from the paternal authority. On this law-do&rine was 
 founded the peculiar formality and method of emanci- 
 pating Sons. A pair of fcales, and fome copper coin were 
 firft brought; without the prefence of thefe ingredient* 
 the whole bufinefs would have been void ; and the Father 
 then made a formal fale of his fon to a perfon ap- 
 pointed to buy him, who was immediately to free, or ma- 
 numit him : thefe fales and manumiffions were repeated 
 three times. Five wkneffes were to be prefent, befides a 
 Man to hold the fcales (Libripens), and another (Antejiatus) 
 occalionally to remind the witneffes to be attentive to the 
 bufinefs before them. 8
 
 H2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 except for very few cafes of fraud. Here th 
 Prastor likewife interfered in his capacity of 
 Judge of Equity, though fo very late as the 
 times of Cicero ; and promifed relief to defraud- 
 ed perfons, in thofe cafes in which the Laws in 
 being afforded no action. )u<e dob malo fafla 
 ejfe dicentur, ft de his rebus alia aftio non erit, & 
 jujla caufaejjc videbitur, Judicium d a bo (a). By 
 Edicts of the fame nature, Praetors in procefs 
 of time gave relief in certain cafes to married 
 Women, and likewife to Minors (Minoribus xxv 
 annis fuccurrit Praetor, &x. (b). 
 
 (a) At the fame time that the Prxtor proffered a new 
 Edict, he alfo made public thofe peculiar formulae by which 
 the execution of the fame was afterwards to be required 
 from him. The name of that Prsetor who nrfl produced 
 the Edift above mentioned, was Aquilius, as we are in- 
 formed by Cieero, in that elegant flory well known to 
 Scholars, in which he relates the kind of fraud that was 
 put upon Canius, a Roman Knight, when he purchafed a 
 pleafure-houfe and gardens, near Syracufe in Sicily, 
 This account Cicero concludes with obferving that Canius 
 was left without remedy, '* as Aquilius, his Colleague 
 " and friend, had not yet published his formulas concern 
 {l ing fraud." >uid enim facer et ? nondum enim Aquilius \ 
 Collega & familiar is me us, protulerat de dolo malo Jormulas. 
 Off. III. 14. 
 
 (Jo) The Law Colle&ion, or Syftem that was formed 
 by the feries of Edicts publifhed at different times by 
 Praetors, was called Ius Pratorium, and alfo Jus Hono- 
 rarium (not firiftly binding.) The laws of the Twelve 
 Tables, together with all fuch other Laws as had at any
 
 OF ENGLAND. 143 
 
 The Courts of Equity eftablifhed in Eng- 
 land, have in like manner provided remedies 
 for a very great number of cafes, or fpecies of 
 demand, for which the Courts of Common 
 Law, cramped by their forms and peculiar law 
 tenets, can afford none. Thus, the Courts of 
 Equity may, in certain cafes, give actions for 
 and againit infants, notwithstanding their mi- 
 nority and for and againit. married Women, 
 notwithstanding their coverture. Married Wo- 
 men may even in certain cafes, fue their huf- 
 bands before a Court of Equity. Executors may 
 be made to pay interefl for money that lies long 
 in their hands. Courts of Equity may appoint 
 Commiffioners to hear the evidence of abfent 
 witnefTes. When other proofs fail, they may 
 impofe an oath on either of the Parties; or, in 
 
 time been pa/Ted in the Affembly of the People, were 
 called by way of eminence, Ius Civile. The distinction, 
 was exactly of the fame nature as that which takes place 
 :n England, between the Common and Statute Laws, 
 and the law or practice of the Courts of Equity. The 
 two branches of the Praetor's judicial office were very ac- 
 curately diftinguifhed , and there was befides, this capital 
 difference between the remedies or actions which he gave 
 in his capacity of Judge of Civil Law, and thofe in his 
 capacity of Judge of Equity, that the former, being 
 grounded on the Ius Civile, were perpetual ; the latter 
 muft be preferred within the year, and were accordingly 
 called ASliones annua, or ABiones pratori< ; in the fame 
 manner as the former were called Aiiionei civile;, or 
 Atliones zretn<t.
 
 U4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the like cafe of a failure of proofs, they may 
 compel a trader to produce his books of trade. 
 They may alfo confirm a title to land, though 
 one has loft his writings, &x. &c. 
 
 The power of the Courts of Equity in Eng- 
 land, of which the Court of Chancery is the 
 principal one, no doubt owes its origin to the 
 power pofleiTed by this latter, both of creating 
 and ifluing Writs. When new complicated 
 cafes offered, for which a new kind of Writ 
 was wanted, the Judges of Chancery, finding 
 that it was necefiary that jnftice mould be done, 
 and at the fame time being unwilling to make 
 general and perpetual provifions on the cafes 
 before them by creating new Writs, command- 
 ed the appearance of both Parties, in order to 
 procure as complete information as poiTible in 
 regard to the circumftances attending the cafe; 
 and then they gave a decree upon the fame by 
 way of experiment. 
 
 To beginnings and circumftances like thefe 
 the Englifh Courts of Equity, it is not to be 
 doubted, owe their prefent exiftence. In our 
 days, when fuch flrict notions are entertained 
 concerning the power of Magiftrates and 
 Judges, it can fcarcely be fuppofed that thofe 
 Courts, however ufeful, could gain admit- 
 tance. Nor indeed, even in the times when 
 they were inftituted, were their proceedings
 
 OF ENGLAND. 145 
 
 free from opposition ; and afterwards, fo late as 
 the reign of Queen Elizabeth, it was adjudged 
 in the cafe of Collefton and Gardner, that the 
 killing a Sequeflrator from the Court of Chan- 
 cery, in the difcharge of his buSinefs, was no 
 murder, which judgement could only be a- 
 warded on the ground that the Sequestrator's 
 commiffion, and confequently the power of 
 his Employers, were illegal (a). However, the 
 authority of the Courts of Equity has in pro- 
 cefs of time become fettled ; one of the con- 
 flituent branches of the Legislature even re- 
 ceives at prefent appeals from the decrees paST- 
 ed in thofe Courts; and I have no doubt that 
 feveral Acts of the whole Legislature might be 
 produced, in which the omce of the Courts 
 f Equity is openly acknowledged. 
 
 The kind of procefs that has in time been 
 eftabliShed in the Court of Chancery, is as fol- 
 lows. After a petition is received by the Court, 
 the perfon fued is ferved with a writ of Subpoena, 
 
 {a) When Sir Edward Coke was Lord Chief Juftice 
 of the King's Bench, and Lord Ellefmere Lord Chan- 
 cellor, during the reign of James I. a very ferious quar- 
 rel alfo took place between the Courts of Law, and thofe 
 of Equity, which is mentioned in the fourth Chapter of 
 the third Book of Judge Blackilone's Commentaries : a 
 Work in which more might have been faid on the fubjeel 
 of the Courts of Equitv. 
 
 L
 
 146 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 to command his appearance. If he does not 
 appear, an attachment is iffued againft him; 
 and if a non inventus is returned, that is, if he is 
 pot to be found, a proclamation goes forth 
 againft him; then a commiflion of rebellion is 
 ifTued for apprehending him, and bringing him 
 to the Fleet prifon. If the peribn fued {lands 
 farther in contempt, a Serjeant at arms is to be 
 fent out to take him; and if he cannot be taken, 
 a fequeitration of his land may be obtained till 
 he appears. Such is the power which the Court 
 of Chanceiy, as a Court of Equity, hath gra- 
 dually acquired to compel appearance before it. 
 In regard to the execution of the Decrees it 
 gives, it feems that Court has not been quite 
 fp fuccefsful; at leaft, thofe Law-writers whofe 
 Works I have had an opportunity to fee, hold 
 it as a maxim, that the Court of Chancery can- 
 not bind the eftate, but only the peribn ; and 
 as a confequence, a peribn who refufes to fub- 
 mit to its decree, is only to be confined to the 
 Fleet prifon (<?). 
 
 {a) The Court of Chancery was very likely the 
 firft inftituted cf the two Courts oi Equity : as it was 
 the Hi^heft Court in the Kingdom, it was belt able to 
 beo-in the eftabliihment of an ofr.ee, or power, which 
 naturally gave rife at firit to fo many objections. The 
 Court of Exchequer, we ma) fuppofe, only followed 
 the example of the Court of Chancery : in order the bet- 
 ter to fecure the new power it affymsd, it even found i;
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 147 
 
 On this occafion I ffiall obferve, that the 
 authority of the Lord Chancellor, in England, 
 in his capacity of a Judge of Equity, is much 
 more narrowly limited than that which the 
 Praetors in Rome had been able to afllime. 
 The Roman Praetors, we are to remark, united 
 in themfelves the double office of deciding 
 cafes according to the Civil Law (Ius civile), 
 and to the Praetorian Law, or Law of Equity ; 
 nor did there exiftany other Court befides their 
 own, that might ferve as a check upon them : 
 hence it happened that their proceedings in the 
 career of Equity, were very arbitrary indeed. 
 In the firft piace, they did not ufe to make it 
 any very flrid: rule to adhere to the tenor of 
 their own Edicts, during the whole year which 
 their office lafted ; and they affumed a power 
 of altering them as they thought proper. To 
 remedy fo capital a defect in the diftribution 
 of Juftice, a law was paffed fo late as the year 
 of Rome 687 (not long before Tully's time) 
 which was called Lex Cornelia, from the name 
 of C. Cornelius, a Tribune of the People, who 
 propounded it under the Confulfhip of C. Pifo, 
 and Man. Glabrio. By this law it was enacted, 
 
 neceffary to bring out the whole ftrergth it could mufter 
 and both the Treasurer and the Chmcellor of the Exche- 
 (jter fit (or. are fuppofed to fit) in the Court of Exchequer, 
 when it h formed as a Court oi Equity.
 
 148 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 that Praetors mould in future constantly decree 
 according to their own Edicts, without altering 
 any thing in them during the whole year of their 
 Praetorihip. Some modern Civilians produce 
 a certain Senatufconfult to the fame erTed:, 
 which, they fay, had been paffed a hundred 
 years before ; while others are of opinion that 
 the fame is not genuine : however, fuppofing 
 it to be really fo, the pamng of the law we 
 mention, ihews that it had not been fo well at- 
 tended to as it ought to have been. 
 
 Though the above mentioned arbitrary pro- 
 ceedings of Praetors were put a flop to, they 
 flill retained another privilege, equally hurtful ; 
 which was, that every new Praetor, on his 
 coming into office, had it in his power to re- 
 tain only what part he pleafed of the Edicts of 
 his predecefTors, and to reject the remainder: 
 from which it followed that the Praetorian 
 Laws or Edicts, though provided for fo great 
 a number of important cafes, were really in 
 rorce for only one year, the time of the du- 
 ration of a Praetor's office (a). Nor was a re- 
 
 (a) Thofe Edicts of their predecefTors in office, 
 which the new Praetors thought proper to retain, were 
 called Edicla Tralatitia ; thofe which they themfelves 
 publifhed (as alio the alterations they made in former on< ) 
 were called Edirta Nova. Prom the above mentioned
 
 OFENGLAND. 149 
 
 gulation made to remedy this capital defect 
 in the Roman Jurifpruderice, before the time 
 of the Emperor Hadrian ; which is another 
 remarkable proof of the very great flownefs 
 with which ufeful public regulations take place 
 in every Nation. Under the reign of the Em- 
 peror we mention, the rhoft ufeful Edicts of 
 former Prsetors were by his order collected, or 
 rather compiled into one general Edict, which 
 was thenceforwards to be obferved by all civil 
 Judges in their decifion, and was accordingly* 
 called the perpetual Edict (perpetuum Ediclum.) 
 This Edict, though now loft, foon grew into 
 great repute ; all the Jurifconfults of thofc 
 days vied with each other in writing commenta- 
 ries upon it; and the Emperor himfclf thought it 
 fo glorious an act of his reign, to have caufed the 
 fame to be framed, that he conlidered himfelf 
 on that account as being another Numa (a). 
 
 power exercifed by every new Pnetor in turn, their Edicts 
 were fometimes diftinguifhed by the appellation of Leget 
 annute, annual laws. See Orat. in Ver. I. 42. 
 
 (a) Several other more extenfive law compilations 
 were framed after the perpetual Edict we mention j 
 there having been a kind of emulation between the Ro- 
 man Emperors., in regard to %ie improvement of the 
 Law. At Lift, under the reign of Juitinian, that cele- 
 brated Compilation was publilhed, cailed the Code of 
 Juftiman, which, under different titles, comprifes the Ro- 
 man Laws, the Edicts of the Prxtors, together with the
 
 * 5 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But the Courts of Equity in England, 
 notwithftanding the extenfive jurifdidtion they 
 have been able in procefs of time to af- 
 fume, never fuperfeded the other Courts of 
 law. Thefe Courts flill continue to exift in 
 the fame manner as formerly, and have proved 
 a lafting check on the innovations, and in 
 general the proceedings of the Courts of E- 
 quity. And here we may remark the lingular, 
 and at the fame time effectual, means of ba- 
 lancing each other's influence, reciprocally pof- 
 fefTed by the Courts of the two different fpecies. 
 By means of its exclufive privilege both of 
 creating and iffuing writs, the Court of Chan- 
 cery has been able to hinder the Courts of 
 Common Law from arrogating to themfelves 
 the cognizance of thofe new cafes which were 
 not provided for by any law in being, and thus 
 dangeroufly uniting in themfelves the power of 
 judges of Equity with that of Judges of Com- 
 mon Law. On the other hand, the Courts of 
 
 refcripts of the Emperors ; and an equal fanclion was 
 giver, to the whole. This was an event of much the 
 lame nature as that which will take place in England, 
 whenever a coalition fhall be effected between the Courts 
 of Common Law, and thofe of Equity, and both fhall 
 thenceforwards be bound alike to frame their judgments 
 from the whole mafs of decided cafes and precedents then 
 exifting, at leaft of fuch as it will be poflibie to bring 
 confidently together into one compilation.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 151 
 
 Common Law are alone inverted with the 
 power of punifhing (or allowing damages for) 
 thofe cafes of violence by which the proceed- 
 ings of the Courts of Equity might be oppofed; 
 and by that means they have been able to ob- 
 flruct the enterprizes of the latter, and prevent 
 their effecting in themfelves the like dangerous 
 union of the two offices of Judges of Common 
 Law, and of Equity. 
 
 Owing to the fituation of the Englifh Courts 
 of Equity, with refpect to the Courts of Com- 
 mon Law, thofe Courts have really been kept 
 within limits that may be called exactly de- 
 lined, if the nature of their functions be con- 
 fidered. In the firft place, they can neither 
 touch Acts of Parliament, rtor the eftablifhed 
 practice of the other Courts, much lefs re- 
 verfe the judgments already pafTed in thefe 
 latter, as the Roman Prsetors fometimes ufed 
 to do in regard to the decifions of their prede- 
 ceffors in office, and fometimes alfo in regard 
 to their own. The Courts of Equity are even 
 retrained from taking cognizance of any cafe 
 for which the other Courts can poffibly afford 
 remedies. Nay, fo ftrenuoufly have the Courts 
 of Common Law defended the verge of their 
 frontier, that they have prevented the Court3 
 of Equity from uling in their proceedings the 
 
 L4
 
 *5* THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 mode of Trial by a Jury ; fo that, when in a cafe 
 already begun to be taken cognizance of by 
 the Court of Chancery, the Parties happen to 
 join ifiue on any particular fact (the truth or 
 falfehood of which a Jury is to determine), the 
 Court of Chancery is obliged to deliver up the 
 caufe to the Court of King's Bench, there to 
 be finally decided (a). In fine, the example of 
 the regularity of the proceedings, pracYifed in 
 the Courts of Common Law, has been com- 
 municated to the Courts of Equity ; and Rolls 
 or Records are carefully kept of the pleadings, 
 determinations, and ads of thofe Courts, to 
 ferve as rules for future deciiions (b.) 
 
 So far therefore from having it in his power 
 i to temper and moderate," (that is, to alter) 
 the Written Law or Statutes, a Judge of Equity 
 we find, cannot alter the Unwritten Law, that 
 is to fay, the eflabliihed practice of the other 
 Courts, and the judgments grounded there- 
 upon, nor even can he meddle with thofe 
 cafes for which either the Written or Unwritten 
 Law have already made general provifions, and 
 
 (a) See Cunningham's and Jacob's Law Dictionaries, 
 fajfim. 
 
 (b) The Mafter of the Rolls is the Keeper of thofe 
 records, as the title of this office exprefies. His office 
 in the Court of Chancery is of great importance, as 
 he can hear and determine caufes in the abfence of the 
 Lord Chancellor.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 153 
 
 of which there is a poflibility for the ordinary- 
 Courts of Law to take cognizance. 
 
 From all the above obfervations it follows, 
 that, of the Courts of Equity as eftablifhed in 
 England, the following definition may be gi- 
 ven, which i9, that they are a kind of inferior 
 experimental Legislature, continually employed 
 in finding out and providing law remedies for 
 thofe new fpecies of cafes for which neither 
 the Courts of Common Law, nor the Legif- 
 lature, have as yet found it convenient or prac- 
 ticable to eftablifh any. In doing which, they 
 are to forbear to interfere with fuch cafes as 
 they find already in general provided for. A 
 Judge of Equity is alfo to adhere in his deci- 
 sions, to the fyftem of decrees formerly pafled 
 in his own Court, regular records of which are 
 kept for that purpofe. 
 
 From this latter circumftance it again fol- 
 lows, that a Judge of Equity, by the very 
 exercife he makes of his power, is continually 
 abridging the arbitrary part of it; as every 
 new cafe he determines, every precedent he 
 eftablifhes, becomes a land-mark or boundary 
 which both he and his fuccefibrs in office are 
 afterwards expected to regard. 
 
 Here it may be added as a conclufion, 
 
 that appeals from the Decrees panned in the 
 
 Courts of Equity are carried to the Houfe of 
 6
 
 x 54 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Peers; which bare circumflance might fuggeit 
 that a Judge of Equity is fubjedted to certain 
 pofitive rules, befides thofe 6< of nature and con- 
 " fcience only;" an appeal being naturally 
 grounded on a fuppontion that fome rules of 
 that kind were neglected. 
 
 The above difcuffion on the Englifh Law, 
 has proved much longer than I intended at firft; 
 fo much as to have fvvelled, I find, into two 
 new additional Chapters. However, I confefs 
 I have been under the greater temptation to 
 treat at fome length the fubject of the Courts 
 of Equity, as I have found the error (which 
 may be called a confhcutional one) concerning 
 the arbitrary office of thofe Courts, to be coun- 
 tenanced by the apparent authority of Lawyers, 
 and of Men of abilities, at the fame time that 
 I have not feen in any book any attempt made 
 profeffedly to confute the fame, nor indeed to 
 point out the nature and true office of the 
 Courts of Equity. 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 Of Criminal Juflke. 
 
 WE are now to treat of an article, which, 
 though it does not in England, and 
 indeed fhould not in any State, make part of 
 the powers which are properly Conflitutional>
 
 OF ENGLAND. 155 
 
 that is, of the reciprocal rights by means of 
 which the Powers that concur to form the Go- 
 vernment conftantly balance each other, yet 
 eiTentially interefts the fecurity of individuals, 
 and, in the ifFue, the Conftitution itfelf; I 
 mean to fpeak of Criminal Juftice. But, pre- 
 vious to an expofition of the laws of England 
 on this head, it is neceffary to defire the Rea- 
 der's attention to certain confiderations. 
 
 When a Nation entrufts the power of the 
 State to a certain number of perfons, or to one, 
 it is with a view to two points : the one, to re- 
 pel more effectually foreign attacks; the other, 
 to maintain domeftic tranquility. 
 
 To accomplifh the former point, each indi- 
 vidual furrenders a fhare of his property, and 
 fometimes, to a certain degree, even of his 
 liberty. But, though the power of thofe who 
 are the Heads of the State may thereby be ren- 
 dered very considerable, yet it cannot be faid, 
 that liberty is, after all, in any high degree en- 
 dangered: becaufe mould ever the Executive 
 Power turn againft the Nation a ilrength which 
 ought to be employed folely for its defence, 
 this Nation, if it were really free, by which I 
 mean, unreftrained by political prejudices, 
 would be at no lofs for providing the means of 
 its fecurity.
 
 124 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In regard to the latter object, that is, the 
 maintenance of domeftic tranquillity, every in- 
 dividual muft, exclufive of new renunciations 
 of his natural liberty, moreover furrender, which 
 is a matter of far more dangerous confequence, 
 a part of his perfonal fecurity. 
 
 The Legiflative power, being, from the nature 
 of human affairs, placed in the alternative, 
 either of expofing individuals to dangers which 
 it is at the fame time able extremely to diminifh, 
 or of delivering up the State to the boundlefs 
 calamities of violence and anarchy, finds itfelf 
 compelled to reduce all its members within 
 reach of the arm of the public Power, and, by 
 withdrawing in fuch cafes the benefit of the 
 Social ftrength, to leave them expofed, bare, 
 and defencelefs, to the exertion of the compara- 
 tively immenfe power of the Executors of the 
 laws. 
 
 Nor is this all ; for, inflead of that power- 
 ful re-a&ion which the public authority ought 
 in the former cafe to experience, here it muft 
 find none ; and the law is obliged to profcribe 
 even the attempt of refinance. It is there- 
 fore in regulating fo dangerous a power, and 
 in guarding left it fhould deviate from the real 
 end of its inftitution, that legiflation ought to 
 exhauft all its efforts.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 157 
 
 But here it is of great importance to obferve, 
 that the more powers a Nation has referved to 
 itielf, and the more it limits the authority of 
 the Executors of the laws, the more induftri- 
 oufly ought its precautions to be multiplied. 
 
 In a State where, from aferiesof events, the 
 will of the Prince has at length attained to hold 
 the place of law, he fpreads an univerfal oppref- 
 fion, arbitrary and unrefifted ; even complaint 
 is dumb ; and the individual, undiftinguifhable 
 by him, finds a kind of fafety in his own insigni- 
 ficance. With refpedf. to the few who furround 
 him, as they are at the fame time the inftruments 
 of his greatnefs, they have nothing to dread but 
 momentary caprices ; a danger againft which, 
 if there prevails a certain general mildnefs of 
 manners, they are in a great meafure fecured. 
 
 But in a State where the Minifters of the laws 
 meet with obftacles at every ftep, even their 
 ftrongeft paffions are continually put in motion; 
 and that portion of public authority, depofited 
 with them to be the inftrument of national tran- 
 quillity, eafily becomes a moil formidable wea- 
 pon. 
 
 Let us begin with the moil favourable fuppo- 
 fnion, and imagine a Prince whofe intentions 
 are in every cafe thoroughly upright, let us 
 even fuppofe that he never lends an ear to the
 
 i 5 S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fuggeftions of thofe vvbofe intereft it is to deceive 
 him: neverthelefs, he will be fubjeet to error: 
 and this error, which, I will farther allow, folely 
 proceeds from his attachment to the public 
 welfare, yet may very pombly happen to prompt 
 him to act as if his views were directly oppoiite. 
 
 When opportunities lhall offer (and many 
 fuch will occur) of procuring a public advan- 
 tage by overleaping reftraints, confident in the 
 uprightnefs of his intentions, and being natu- 
 rally not very earned to difcover the diftant evil 
 confequences of actions in which, from his very 
 virtue, he feels a kind of complacency, he will 
 not perceive, that, in aiming at a momentary 
 advantage, he flrikes at the laws themfelves on 
 which the fafety of the Nation refts, and that 
 thofe acts, fo laudable when we only confider 
 the motive of them, make a breach at which 
 tyranny will one day enter. 
 
 Yet farther, he will not even underfland 
 the complaints that will be made againfl him. 
 To infill: upon them will appear to him to the 
 laii degree injurious : pride, when perhaps he 
 is leaft aware of it, will enter the lifts; what he 
 began with calmnefs, he will profecute with 
 warmth; and if the laws fhall not have taken 
 every polTible precaution, he may think he is 
 acting a very honeft part, while he treats as
 
 OFENGLAND. 159 
 
 enemies of the State, Men whofe only crime 
 will be that of being more fagacious than him- 
 felf, or of being in a better fituation for judg- 
 ing of the refuits of meafures. 
 
 But it were mightily to exalt human nature, 
 to think that this cafe of a Prince who never 
 aims at augmenting his power, may in any 
 fhape be expected frequently tp occur. Expe- 
 rience, on the contrary, evinces that the happiefl 
 difpofitions are not proof againft the allure- 
 ments of power, which has no charms but as it 
 leads on to new advances; authority endures not 
 the very idea of reftraint; nor does it ceafe to 
 ftruggle till it has beaten down every boundary. 
 
 Openly to level every barrier, at once to 
 aflume the abfolute Matter, are, as we faid be- 
 fore, fruitlefs tafks. But it is here to be re- 
 membered, that "thofe powers of the People 
 which are referved as a check upon the Sove- 
 reign, can only be effectual ib far as they are 
 brought into action by private individuals. 
 Sometimes a Citizen, by the force and perfe- 
 verance of his complaints, opens the eyes of the 
 Nation; at other times, fome member of the 
 Legiflature propofes a law for the removal of 
 fome public abufe : thefe, therefore, will be the 
 perfons againft whom the Prince will direct all 
 his efforts (a). 
 
 [a) By the word Prince, I mean shofe who. under
 
 i6o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 And he will the more aifuredly do fo, as, from 
 the error fo ufual among Men in power, he will 
 think that the oppofition he meets with, how- 
 ever general, wholly depends on the activity of 
 but one or two leaders ; and amidft the calcula- 
 tions he will make, both of the fuppofed fmall- 
 nefs of the obftacle which offers to his view, and 
 of the decifive confequence of the fingle blow he 
 thinks he needs to flrike, he will be urged on by 
 the defpair of ambition on the point of being 
 baffled, and by the moft violent of all hatreds, 
 that which was preceded by contempt. 
 
 In that cafe which I am ftill confidering, of 
 a really free Nation, the Sovereign muft be 
 very careful that military violence do not 
 make the fmalleft part of his plan : a breach of 
 the focial compact like this added to the hor- 
 ror of the expedient, would infallibly endanger 
 his whole authority. But, on the other hand, 
 as he was reiblved to fucceed, he will in de- 
 fect of other refources, try the utmoft extent 
 of the legal powers which the Constitution has 
 intruded with him ; and if the laws have 
 not in a manner provided for every poffible 
 cafe, he will avail himfelf of the imperfect 
 precautions themfelves that have been taken, 
 as a cover to his tyrannical proceedings ; he 
 
 whatever appellation and in whatever Government it may 
 be, are at the head of public affairs.
 
 OF ENGLAND, 161 
 
 will purfue fteadily his particular object, while 
 his profeflions breathe nothing but the general 
 welfare, and deftroy the affertors of the laws, 
 under the very fhelter of the forms contrived 
 for their fecurity (#). 
 
 This is not all ; independently of the im- 
 mediate mifchief he may do, If the Legiflature 
 do not interpofe in time, the blows will reach 
 the Conftitution itfelf ; and the confternation 
 becoming general amongft the People, each 
 individual will find himfelf enflaved in a State 
 which yet may ftill exhibit all the common ap- 
 pearances of liberty. 
 
 Not only, therefore, the fafety of the indi- 
 vidual, but that of the Nation itfelf, requires the 
 utmoft precautions in the eftablifhmeut of that 
 neceffary, but 1 formidable, prerogative of dif- 
 penfkg punifhments. The firfl to be taken, 
 even without which it is impoflible to avoid the 
 dangers above fuggefted, is, that it never be 
 left at the difpofal, nor, if it be poflible, expofed 
 to the influence of the Man who is the deposi- 
 tary of the public power. 
 
 (a) If the:.- wrc any perfon who charged me with 
 calumniating human Natire, for it is her alone I am ac- 
 cufi-g here, 1 would tiefue him to call his eyes on the 
 Hiitory of a Lewis XI. of a Richelieu, and, above all, 
 on cnat of England before the Revolution; he w li 
 fee the ::rt^ ana aCtivit of Government increafe, in pro- 
 j . "t:c-:. a^ it gradually loll its means of oppreiuon. 
 
 M
 
 i6z THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The next indifpenfable precaution is, that 
 neither ftiall this power be veiled in the legif- 
 lative Body; and this precaution, fo neceflfary 
 alike under every mode of Government, be- 
 comes doubly fo, when only a fmall part of the 
 Nation has a mare in the legiflative power. 
 
 If the judicial authority were lodged in the 
 legiflative part of the People, not only the great 
 inconvenience mufl enfue of its thus becoming 
 independent, but alfo that worfl of evils, the 
 fuppreffion of the fole circumflance that can 
 well identify this part of the Nation with the 
 whole, which is, a common fubjedtion to the 
 rules which they themfelves prefer ibe. The 
 legiflative Body, which could not, without ruin 
 to itfclf, eftabliih, openly and by diredt laws, 
 diflinctions in favour of its Members, would 
 introduce them by its judgments; and the Peo- 
 ple, in electing Reprefentatives, would give 
 themfelves Mailers. 
 
 The judicial power ought therefore abfolutely 
 to refide in a fubordinate and dependent body; 
 dependent, not in its particular atls, with re- 
 gard to which it ought to be a fancluary, but 
 in its rules and in its forms, which the legifla- 
 tive authority mufl prefcribe. Plow is this 
 body to be compofed ? In this vefpect farther 
 precautions mufl: be taken. 
 
 In a State where the Prince is abfolute
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 163 
 
 Mafter, numerous Bodies of Judges are moft 
 convenient, inafmuch as they retrain, in a 
 confiderable degree, that refpedt of Perfons 
 which is one inevitable attendant on that mode 
 of Government. Befides, thofe bodies, what- 
 ever their outward privileges may be, being at 
 bottom in a flate of great weaknefs, have no 
 other means of acquiring the refpecl: of the 
 people than their integrity, and their conftancy 
 in obferving certain rules and forms: nay, 
 thefe circumftances united, in fome degree over- 
 awe the Sovereign himfelf, and difcourage the 
 thoughts he might entertain of making them 
 the tools of his caprices {a). 
 
 But, in an effectually limited Monarchy, 
 that is, where the Prince is underftood to be, 
 and in fact is, fubject to the laws, numerous 
 
 {a) The above obfervations are in a great meafure 
 meant to allude to the French Parlemens, and particu- 
 larly that of Paris, which forms fuch a confiderable 
 Body as to have been once fummoned as a fourth Oder 
 to the General filiates of the kingdom. The weight of 
 that body, increafed by the circumftance of the Members 
 holding their places for life, has in general been attended, 
 with the advantage juft mentioned, of placing them above 
 being over-awed by private individuals in the adminiltra- 
 tion either of civil or criminal Juftice ; it has even ren- 
 dered them fo difficult to be managed by the Court, that 
 the Miniilers have been at times obliged to appoint par- 
 ticular Judges, or Gmmijj'arier, to try fuch Men as they 
 refolved to ruin- 
 
 Ma
 
 i6 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Bodies of Judicature would b repugnant to 
 the fpirit of the Conftitution, which requires 
 that all powers in the State mould be as much 
 confined as the end of their inftitution can al- 
 low ; not to add, that in the vicifiitucles incident 
 to fuch a State, they might exert a very danger- 
 ous influence. 
 
 Befides, that awe which is naturally infpired 
 by fuch Bodies, and is fo ufeful when it is ne- 
 ceflary to ftrengthen the feeblenefs of the laws, 
 would not only be fupcrfluous in a State where 
 the whole power of the Nation is on their fide, 
 but would moreover have the mifchievous ten- 
 dency to introduce another fort of fear than 
 that which Men muft be taught to entertain. 
 Thofe mighty Tribunals, I am willing to fup- 
 pofe, would prefei ve, in all fituations of affairs, 
 that integrity which diftinguifhes them in 
 States of a different Conftitution ; they would 
 never inquire after the influence, (till lefs the 
 political fentiments, of thole whofe fate they 
 
 Thefe, however, are only local advantages, and. re- 
 lative to the natuve of the French Government, which 
 is an uncontrouled Monarchy, with confiderable remain;. 
 of Ariftocracy. But in a f:ee State, fuch a powerful 
 Body of Men, veiled vv'th the power of deciding on the 
 life, honour, and property, of the Citizens, would, as 
 will be prefently {hewn, be productive of very dangerous 
 political confequences ; and the more fo, if fuch Judges 
 had, as is the cafe all over the world, except here, the 
 power of deciding upon the matter of law, and the 
 matter of fact.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 16$ 
 
 were called' to decide ; but thefe advantages 
 not being founded in the neceflity of things, 
 and the power of fuch Judges feeming to ex- 
 empt them from being fo very virtuous, Men 
 would be in danger of taking up the fatal 
 opinion, that the fimple exadt obiervance of 
 the laws is not the only tafk of prudence : the 
 Citizen called upon to defend, in the fphere 
 where fortune has placed him, his own rights, 
 and thofe of the Nation itfelf, would dread the 
 confequence of even a lawful conduct, and 
 though encouraged by the law, might de- 
 fert himfelf when he came to behold its Mini- 
 nifters. 
 
 In the afTembly of thofe who fit as his Judges, 
 the Citizen might poflibly defcry no enemies : 
 but neither would he fee any Man whom a fimi- 
 larity of circumilances might engage to take a 
 concern in his fate : and their rank, efpecially 
 when joined with their numbers, would appear 
 to him, to lift them above that which over-awes 
 injuftice, where the law has been unable to fe- 
 cure any other check, I mean the reproaches of 
 the Public. 
 
 And thefe his fears would be confiderably 
 heightened, if, by the admiffion of the Jurif- 
 prudence received among certain Nations, he 
 beheld thofe Tribunals, already fo formidable, 
 
 M q
 
 i66 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 wrap themfelves up in myftery, and be made, 
 as it were inacceffible (a). 
 
 He could not think, without difmay, of 
 thofe vait prifons within which he is one day 
 perhaps to be immured of thofe proceed- 
 ings, unknown to him, through which he is 
 to pafs of that total feclufion from the fociety 
 of other Men nor of thofe long and fecret 
 examinations, in which, abandoned wholly 
 to himfelf, he will have nothing but a paflive 
 defence to oppofe to the artfully varied quef- 
 tions of Men, whofe intentions he mall at lead 
 
 {a) An allufion is made here to the fecrecy with 
 which the proceedings, in the adminiftration of criminal 
 Juflice, are to be carried on, according to the rules of the 
 civil law, which in that refpett are adopted over all Eu 
 rope. As foon as the prifoner is committed, he is de- 
 barred of the fight of every body, till he has gone through 
 his feveral examinations. One or two Judges are ap- 
 pointed to examine him, with a Clerk to take his an- 
 fwers in writing : and he (lands alone before them in 
 feme private room in the prifon. The witneffes are to 
 be examined a part, and he is not admitted to fee thenj 
 till their evidence is clofed : they are then confronted to- 
 gether before a;: the Judges, to the end that the witneffes 
 may fee if the p:ifoner is really the Man they meant 
 in giving their refpective evidences, and that the pri- 
 foner may objecT. to fuch of them as he mall think pro- 
 per. This done, the depositions of thofe witneffes who 
 are adjudged u; on trial to be exceptionable, are fet afide : 
 the depofuiono of the others are to be laid before the 
 judges, as well as the anfwers of the prifoner, who has
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 167 
 
 miftruft, and in which his fpirits, broken down 
 by folitude, fhall receive no fupport, either from 
 the counfels of his friends^or the looks of thofe 
 who mall offer up vows for his deliverance. 
 
 The fecurity of the individual, and the eon- 
 fcioufnefs of that fecurity, being then equally 
 effential to the enjoyment of liberty, and ne- 
 ceflary for the prefervation of it, thefe two 
 points mufl never be left out of fight, in the 
 eitablifhment of a judicial power; and I con- 
 ceive that they neceffarily lead to the following' 
 maxims. 
 
 been previoufly called upon to confirm or deny them in 
 their prefence ; and a copy of the whole is delivered to 
 him, that he may, with the afliftance of a Counfel, which 
 is now granted him, prepare for his juftification. The 
 Judges are, as has been faid before, to decide both upon 
 the matter of law and the matter of fact, as well as upon 
 all incidents that may arife during the courfe of the pro- 
 ceedings, fuch as admitting witneffes to be heard in 
 behalf of the prifoner, &c. 
 
 This mode of criminal Judicature may be ufeful as 
 to the bare difcovering of truth, a thing which I do not 
 propofe to difcufs here ; but, at the fame time, a pri- 
 foner is fo completely delivered up into the hands of 
 the Judges, who even can detain him almoft at pleafure 
 by multiplying or delaying his examinations, that, when- 
 ever it is adopted., Men are almoft as much afraid of 
 being accufed, as of being guilty, and eipecially grow 
 very cautious how they interfere in public matters. We 
 fhall fee prefently how the Trial by Jury, peculiar to the 
 Englifh Nation, is admiraWy adapted to the nature of a 
 free State. 
 
 M 4
 
 168 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In the firft place I fhall remind the reader of 
 what has been laid down above, that the judicial 
 authority ought never to refide in an independent 
 Body; Hill lefs in him who is already the truftee 
 of the executive power. 
 
 Secondly, the party accufed ought to be pro- 
 vided with every pofflble means of defence. 
 Above all things, the whole proceedings ought 
 to be public. The Courts, and their different 
 forms, muft be fuch as to infpire refpedt, but 
 never terror ; and the cafes ought to be fo ac- 
 curately afcertained, the limits fo clearly mark- 
 ed, as that neither the executive power, nor 
 the Judges, may ever hope to tranfgrefs them 
 with impunity. 
 
 In fine, fince we mull abfolutely pay a price 
 for the advantage of living in fociety, not only 
 by relincjuifhing fome fhare of our natural li- 
 berty (a furrender which, in a wifely framed Go- 
 vernment, a wife Man will make without re- 
 luctance) but even alfo by rcfigning part of even 
 our pcrfonal fecurity, in a word, fince all judi- 
 cial power is an evil, though a neceflary one, no 
 care fhould be omitted to reduce as far as 
 poflible the dangers of it. 
 
 And as there is however a period at which 
 the prudence of Man muft flop, at which the 
 fafety of the individual muft be given up, and
 
 OF ENGLAND. i6 9 
 
 the law is to refign him over to the judg- 
 ment of a few perfons, that is, to fpeak plainly, 
 to a decifion in fome fenfe arbitrary, it is 
 neceffary that this law mould narrow as far as 
 poffible this fphere of peril, and fo order mat- 
 ters, that when the fubject mail happen to be 
 fummoned to the decifion of his fate by the fal- 
 lible conicience of a few of his fellow-creatures, 
 he may always find in them advocates, and 
 never adverfaries. 
 
 CHAP. XIII. 
 
 The Subjeft continued. 
 
 AFTER having offered to the reader, in 
 the preceding Chapter, fuch general 
 confiderations as I thought neceffary, in order 
 to convey a jufter idea of the fpirit of the cri- 
 minal Judicature in England, and of the ad- 
 vantages peculiar to it, I now proceed to ex- 
 hibit the particulars. 
 
 When a perfon is charged with a crime, the 
 Magiftrate, who is called in England a Jujlice 
 of the Peace, iffues a warrant to apprehend 
 him ; but this warrant can be no more than an 
 order for bringing the party before him : he 
 muft then hear him, and take down in writ-
 
 170 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ing his anfwers, together with the different 
 informations. If it appears on this exami- 
 nation, either that the crime laid to the charge 
 of the perfon who is brought before the Juftice, 
 was not committed, or that there is no juft 
 ground to fufpect him of it, he muft be fet 
 abfolutely at liberty; if the contrary refults 
 from the examination, the party accufed muft 
 give bail for his appearance to anfwer to the 
 charge; ufelefs in capital cafes, for then he 
 muft, for fafer cuftody, be really committed 
 to prifon, in order t?o take his trial at the next 
 Seftions. 
 
 But this precaution of requiring the exami- 
 nation of an accufed perfon, previous to his 
 imprifonment, is not the only care which the 
 law has taken in his behalf; it has farther 
 ordained that the accufation againft him 
 mould be again difculTed, before he can be 
 expofed to the danger of a trial. At every 
 feftion the Sheriff appoints what is called the 
 Gra,ui Jury. This Affembly muft be com- 
 pofed of more than twelve Men, and lefs 
 than twenty-four; and is always formed out 
 of the mod confidcrable perfons in the County. 
 Its function is to examine the evidence that 
 has been given in fupport of every charge : 
 if twJve of thofe perfons do not concur ia
 
 OF ENGLAND, 171 
 
 the opinion that an accufation is well grounded, 
 the party is immediately difcharged; if, on 
 the contrary, twelve of the grand Jury find the 
 proofs fufficient, the prifoner is faid to be in- 
 dicted, and is detained in order to go through 
 the remaining proceedings. 
 
 On the day appointed for his Trial, the 
 prifoner is brought to the bar of the Court, 
 where the Judge, after cauling the bill of in- 
 dictment to be read in his prefence, muft afk 
 him how he would be tried : to which the pri- 
 foner anfwers, by God and my Country, by which 
 he is underftood to claim to be tried by a Jury, 
 and to have all the judicial means of defence to 
 which the law intitles him. The Sheriff then 
 appoints what is called the Petty Jury: this 
 mull be compofed of twelve Men, chofen out 
 of the county where the crime was committed, 
 and poiTeffed of a landed income of ten pounds 
 by the year : their declaration finally decides on 
 the truth or falfhood of the accufation. 
 
 As the fate of the prifoner thus entirely de- 
 pends on the Men who compofe this Jury, 
 Juftice requires that he mould have a fhare in 
 the choice of them; and this he has through 
 the extenfive right which the law has granted 
 him, of challenging, or objecting to, fuch of 
 them as he may think exceptionable.
 
 172 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Thefe challenges are of two kinds. The 
 firft, which is called the challenge to the array y 
 has for its object to have the whole pannel fet 
 afide : it is propofed by the prifoncr when he 
 thinks that the Sheriff who formed the pannel 
 is not indifferent in the caufe ; for inftance, if 
 he thinks he has an intereft in the profecution, 
 that he is related to the profecutor, or in gene- 
 ral to the party who pretends to be injured. 
 
 The feeond kind of challenges are called, 
 to the Polls (in capita): they are exceptions 
 propofed againft the Jurors, feverally, and are 
 reduced to four heads by Sir Edward Coke. 
 That which he calls proper honoris refpeclum, 
 may be propofed againft a Lord impannelled 
 on a jury ; or he might challenge himfelf. 
 That propter defectum takes place when a Ju- 
 ror is legally incapable of ferving that office, 
 as, if he was an alien ; if he had not an eflate 
 Sufficient to qualify him, &c. That propter 
 delictum has for its object to fet afide any Ju- 
 ror convicted of fuch crime or mifdemeanor as 
 renders him infamous, as felony, perjury, &c. 
 That propter affectum is propofed againft a Ju- 
 ror who has an intereft in the conviction of 
 the prifoner : he, for inftance, who has an 
 action depending between him and the pri- 
 foner ; he who is of kin to the profecutor, or
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 173 
 
 his counfcl, attorney, or of the fame fociety 
 or corporation with him, he. (a). 
 
 In fine, in order to relieve even the imagina- 
 tion of the prifoner, the law allows him, in- 
 dependently of the feveral challenges above 
 mentioned, to challenge peremptorily, that is 
 to fay, without fhewing any caufe, twenty Ju- 
 rors fucceffively (). 
 
 When at length the Jury is formed, and 
 they have taken their oath, the indictment is 
 opened, and the profecutor produces the 
 proofs of his accufation. But, unlike to the 
 rules of the Civil Law, the witnefTes deliver 
 their evidence in the prefence of the prifoner : 
 the latter may put queftions to them ; he may 
 alfo produce witnefies in his behalf, and have 
 them examined upon oath. Laftly, he is al- 
 lowed to have a Counfel to afHft him, no: 
 only in the difcumon of any point of law 
 which may be complicated with the fact, but 
 alfo in the investigation of the fact itfelf, and 
 
 (a) When a prifoner is an alien, one half of the 
 Jurors mull alfo be aliens ; a Jury thus formed is called 
 a Jury de medietate lingua. 
 
 (h) When thefe feveral challenges reduce too much 
 the number of the Jurors on the Pannel, which is forty- 
 eight, new ones are named on a writ of the Judge, who 
 are named the Tales, from thofe words of the writ, decern 
 or o3e tales.
 
 i 7 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 who points out to him the queftions he ought 
 to afk, or even alks them for him (a). 
 
 Such are the precautions which the law has 
 devifed for cafes of common profecutions ; but 
 in thofe for High Treafon, and for mifprifion 
 of treafon, that is to fay, for a confpiracy againft 
 the life of the King, or againft the State, and 
 for a concealment of it (), accufations which 
 fuppofe a heat of party and powerful accufers, 
 the law has provided for the accufed party far- 
 ther fafe-guards. 
 
 Firft, no pcrfon can be queftioned .for any 
 treafon, except a direct. attempt on the life of 
 the King, after three years elapfed fince the of- 
 fence. 2. The accufed party may, indepen- 
 dently of his other legal grounds of challeng- 
 ing, peremptorily challenge thirty-five Jurors. 
 3. He may have two Counfel to amft him 
 through the whole courfe of the proceedings. 
 4. That his witnefles may not be kept away, 
 the Judges mufl grant him the fame compul- 
 five procefs to bring them in, which they if- 
 fue to compel the evidences againft him. 
 5. A copy of his indictment mufl be delivered 
 
 (a) This laft article, however, is not eftabliftied by law, 
 except in cafes of treafon ; it is done only through cuftom 
 aind the indulgence of the Judges, 
 
 {b) The penalty of a mifprifion of treafon i. e , the for- 
 feiture of all goods, and imprifonment for life.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 175 
 
 to him ten days at lead before the trial, in 
 prefence of two witneffes, and at the expence 
 of five millings; which copy muft contain all 
 the facts laid to his charge, the names, profef- 
 fions, and abodes, of the Jurors who are to be 
 on the pannel, and of all the witneffes who are 
 intended to be produced againfi him (a). 
 
 When, either in cafes of high treafon, or of 
 inferior crimes, the profecutor and the prifoner 
 have clofed their evidence, and the witneffes 
 have anfwered to the refpective queftions both 
 of the Bench, and of the Jurors, one of the 
 Judges makes a fpeech, in which he funis up 
 the facts which have been advanced on both 
 fides. He points out to the Jury what more 
 precifely conftitutes the hinge of the quellion 
 before them; and he gives them his opinion 
 both with regard to the evidences that have 
 been given, and to the point of law which is to 
 guide them in their decifion. This done, the 
 Jury withdraw into an adjoining room, where 
 they muft remain without eating and drinking, 
 and without fire, till thev have agreed unani- 
 moufiy among themfelves, unlefs the Court 
 give a permiffion to the contrary. Their decla- 
 
 (a) Stat. 7 Will. III. c, 3. and 7 Ann. c. 21. Ths 
 
 latter was to be in force on!v after the tieath of the late 
 Pretender.
 
 176 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ration or verdict Queredittum) muft (unlefs they 
 choofe to give a fpecial verdict) pronounce ex- 
 prefsly, either that the prifoner is guilty, or that 
 he is not guilty, of the fact laid to his charge. 
 Laftly, the fundamental maxim of this mode of 
 proceeding, is, that the Jury muft be unanimous. 
 And as the main object of the inflitution 
 of the Trial by a Jury, is to guard accufed 
 perfons againft all decifions whatfoever by 
 Men invefted with any permanent official au- 
 thority (a), it is not only a fettled principle 
 that the opinion which the Judge delivers 
 has no weight but fuch as the Jury choofe 
 to give it; but their verdict muft befides com- 
 prehend the whole matter in trial, and decide 
 as well upon the fact, as upon the point of 
 law that may arife out of it : in other words, 
 they muft pronounce both on the commimon 
 of a certain fact, and on the reafon which makes 
 fush fact to be contrary to law (). 
 
 {a) " Laws, 1 ' as Junius fays extremely well, " are 
 '* intended, not to truft to what Men will do, but to 
 " guard againft what they may do." 
 
 (b) Unlefs they choofe to give a /pedal ve-dil. 
 When the Jury," fays Coke, doubt of the law and 
 * intend to do that which is jnft, thty find the fpedul 
 ,r matter, and the entry is, Et fuftr iota materia fetimt 
 
 ** difentionem 'Jujliaariorum" Inft. iv. p. 41. Thefe 
 
 wo-ds of Coke, we may obferve, confirm beyond a 
 doubt the power of the Jury to determine on the
 
 OF ENGLAND. 177 
 
 This is even fo effential a point, that a bill of 
 indictment mult exprefsly be grounded upon 
 thofe two objects. Thus, an indictment for 
 treafon muft charge, that the alledged fails were 
 committed with a treafonable intent (proditorie.) 
 An indictment for murder muft exprefs, that 
 the fact has been committed with malice prepenfe, 
 or aforethought. An indictment for robbery 
 muft charge, that the things were taken with an 
 intention to rob,- (amnio fur an di), &c. &c. (V). 
 
 Juries are even fo uncontrolable in their 
 verdict, fo apprehenfive has the Constitution 
 been left precautious to reftrain them in the 
 exercife of their functions, however fpecious in 
 the beginning, might in the iffue be converted 
 
 whole matter in trial : a power which in all conliitu'" 
 fional views is neceffary ; and the more fo, fince a pri- 
 foner cannot in England challenge the Juige, as he can 
 under the Civil Law, and for the fame caufe as he can 
 a witnefs. 
 
 (a) The principle that a Jury is to decide both on the 
 fat and the criminality of it., is fo well understood, that 
 if a verdicl were fo framed as only to have for its objecT: 
 the bare exiltence of the fa'tt laid to the charge of the 
 prifoner, no punifhment could be awarded by the Judge 
 in confequence of it. Thus, in the profecution of Wood - 
 fall, for printing Junius's letter to the King, the Jury 
 brought in the following verdicl, guilty of printing and 
 fuhlifhing, only ; the confequence of which was the dis- 
 charge of the prifoner. 
 
 N
 
 178 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 to the very deftruction of the ends of that 
 inflitution, that it is a repeated principle that 
 a Juror, in delivering his opinion, is to have 
 no other rule but his opinion itfelf, that is to 
 fay, no other rule than the belief which refults 
 to his mind from the facets alledged on both 
 fides, from their probability,, from the credi- 
 bility of the witnefles, and even from all fuck 
 circumflances as he may have a private know- 
 ledge of. Lord Chief Juftice Hale expreffes 
 himfelf on this fubjedt, in the following terms, 
 in his Hiilory of the Common Law of England, 
 chap. 12. n. 
 
 " In this recefs of the Jury, they are to 
 " confider their evidence, to weigh the credi- 
 " bility of the witneffes, and the force and 
 "efficacy of their teftimonies; wherein (as I 
 ,f before faid) they are not precifcly bound to 
 " the rules of the Civil Law, viz. to have 
 " two witneffes to prove every fact, unlefs it 
 " be in cafes of treafon, nor to reject one 
 " witnefs becaufe he is fingle, or always to 
 " believe two witnefles, if the probability 
 " of the facl: does upon other circumftances 
 ct reafonably encounter them; for the Trial 
 is not here limply by witneffes, but by 
 " Jury: nay, it may fo fall out, that a Jury 
 " upon their own knowledge may know a
 
 OFENGLAND. 179 
 
 kt thing to be falfe that a witnefs fwore to be 
 tc true, or may know a witnefs to be ineompe- 
 " tent or incredible, though nothing be object - 
 " ed againft him and may give their verdict 
 " accordingly (a)" 
 
 If the verdict pronounces Hot guilty, the 
 prifoner is fet at liberty, and cannot, on any 
 pretence, be tried again for the fame offence. 
 If the verdict declares him guilty, then, and not 
 till then, the Judge enters upon his function 
 as a Judgej and pronounces the punifhment 
 which the law appoints (b). But, even in this 
 cafe, he is not to judge according to his own 
 
 (a) The fame principles and forms are obferved in civil 
 matters ; only peremptory challenges are not allowed. 
 
 (b) When the party accafed is one of the Lords tem- 
 poral, he likewife enjoys the univerfal privilege of being 
 judged by his Peers ; though the Trial then differs in 
 feveral refpetts. In the firft place, as to the number of 
 the Jurors : all the Peers are to perform the function of 
 fuch, and they mufl be fummoned at leait twenty days 
 beforehand. II. When the Trial takes place during the 
 feffion, it is faid to be in the High Court of Parliament ; 
 and the Peers officiate at once as Jurors and Judges : 
 when the Parliament is not fitting, the Trial is faid to be 
 in the Court of the High Steward of England; an office 
 which is not ufually in being, but is revived on thofe 
 occafions ; and the High Steward performs the office of 
 Judge. III. In either of thefe cafes, unanimity is not 
 required; and the majority, which muft confift of twelve 
 perfons at leaft, is to decide. 
 
 N2
 
 i8o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 difcretion only; he mufl ftridly adhere to the 
 letter of the law ; no conftrudtive extenfion can 
 be admitted ; and however criminal a fad: might 
 in itfelf be, it would pafs unpunifhed if it were 
 found not to be politively comprehended in 
 fome one of the cafes provided for by the law. 
 The evil that may arife from the impunity of a 
 crime, that is, an evil which a new law may in- 
 ftantly flop, has not by the Englifh laws been 
 confidered as of magnitude fufficient to be put 
 in comparifon with the danger of breaking 
 through a barrier on which fo mightily depends 
 the lafety of the individual (#). 
 
 To all thefe precautions taken by the law 
 for the fafety of the Subject, one circumflance 
 inuft be added, which indeed would alone juf- 
 tify the partiality of the Englifh Lawyers to 
 their laws in preference to the Civil Law, I 
 mean the abfolute rejection they have made of 
 
 (a) I (hall give here an inftance of the fcruple with 
 which the Englilh Judges proceed upon occafions of this 
 kind. Sir Henry Ferrers having been arretted by virtue of 
 a warrant, in which he was termed a Knigbt, though he 
 was a Baronet, Nightingale his fervant took his part, 
 and killed the Officer ; but it was decided, that as the 
 Warrant " was an ill Warrant, the killing an Officer in 
 " executing that Warrant, cannot be murder, becaufe no 
 " good Warrant: wherefore he was found not guilty of 
 " the murder and manflaughter." See Croke's Rep. P. 
 HI. P. 3/i. 7
 
 OF ENGLAND. 181 
 
 torture (a). Without repeating here what has 
 been faid on this fubjed: by the admirable Au- 
 thor of the Treatife on Crimes and Punfjhments, 
 I fhall only obferve, that the torture, in itfelf 
 fo horrible an expedient, would, more efpe- 
 cially in a free State, be attended with the moil 
 fatal confequences. It was abfolutely neceiTary 
 to preclude, by rejecting it, all attempts to make 
 the purfuit of guilt an inftrument of vengeance 
 againft the innocent. Even the convicted crimi- 
 nal mult be fpared, and a practice at all rates 
 exploded, which might fo eafily be made an in- 
 ftrument of endlefs vexation and perfecution (). 
 
 (a) Coke fays (Inft. III. p. 35.) that when John Hol- 
 land, Duke of Exeter, and William de la Poole, Duke 
 of Suffolk, renewed, under Henry VI. the attempts 
 made to introduce the Civil Law, they exhibited the tor- 
 ture as a beginning thereof. The inftrument was called 
 the Duke of Exeter's daughter. 
 
 (b) J'idge Fofter relates, from Whitlock, that the 
 Biihop of London having faid to Felton, who had af- 
 faflinated the Duke of Buckingham, " If you will not 
 " confcfs, you muji go to the Rack."' The Man replied, 
 " If it muft be fo, I know not who I may accufe in the 
 *f extremity of the torture ; Biihop Laud perhaps, or any 
 Lord at this Board." 
 
 " Sound fenfe, (adds Fofter) in the mouth of an 
 " Enthufiaft and a Ruffian!" 
 
 Laud having propofed the Rack, the matter was 
 fhortly debated at the Board, and it ended in a reference 
 to the Judges, who unanimoufly refolved that the Rack 
 could not be legally ufed. 
 
 N 3
 
 i2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 For the farther prevention of abufes, it is 
 an invariable ufage, that the Trial be public. 
 The prifoner neither makes his appearance, 
 nor pleads, but in places where every body 
 may have free entrance; and the witneffes 
 when they give their evidence, the Judge 
 when he delivers his opinion, the Jury when 
 they give their verdicft, are all under the pub- 
 lic eye. Laftly, the Judge cannot change either 
 the place, or the kind of punifhment ordered 
 by the law; and a Sheriff who fhould take 
 away the life of a Man in a manner different 
 from that which the law prefcribes, would be 
 profecuted as guilty of murder (<?). 
 
 In a word, the Conftitution of England be- 
 ing a free Conftitution, demanded from that 
 circumftance alone (as I mould already have 
 but too often repeated, if fo fundamental a 
 truth could be too often urged) extraordinary 
 precautions to guard againft the dangers which 
 unavoidably attend the Power of inflicting 
 punifhments ; and it is particularly when con- 
 fidered in this light, that the Trial by Jury 
 proves an admirable institution. 
 
 (a) And if any other perfon but the Sheriff, even the 
 Judge himfelf, were to caufe death to the inflicted upon 
 a Man, though convicted, it would be deemed homicide, 
 See Blackilor.e, book iv. chap. 14.
 
 OF ENGLANn. 183 
 
 By means of it, the Judicial Authority is not 
 only placed out of the hands of the pvlan who 
 is veiled with the Executive Authority it is 
 even out of the hands of the Judge himfelf. 
 Not only, the perfon who is trufted with the 
 public power cannot exert it, till he has as it 
 were received the permiifion to that purpofe, of 
 thofe who are fet apart to adminifter the laws ; 
 but thefe latter are alfo reftrained in a manner 
 exactly alike, and cannot make the law fpeak, 
 but when, in their turn, they have likewife re<- 
 ceived permiffion. 
 
 And thofe perfons to whom the law has thus 
 exclusively delegated the prerogative of de- 
 ciding that a punifhment is to be inflicted, 
 thofe Men without whole declaration the Exe- 
 cutive and the Judicial Powers are both thus 
 bound down to inaction, do not form among 
 themfelves a permanentBody, who may have 
 had time to ftudy how their power can ferve 
 to promote their private views or intereft : they 
 are Men felected at once from among the 
 people, who perhaps never were before called to 
 the exercife of fuch a function, nor forefee that 
 they ever fhall be called to it again. 
 
 As the extenfive right of challenging, effec- 
 tually baffles, on the one hand, the fecret prac* 
 
 N 4
 
 i*4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 tices of fuch as, in the face of fo many difcpu- 
 ragements, might ftill endeavour to make the 
 Judicial Power fubfervient to their own views, 
 and on the other excludes all perfonal refent- 
 ments, the fole affection which remains to in- 
 fluence the integrity of thofe who alone are in- 
 titled to put the public power into action, dur- 
 ing the fhort period of their authority, is, that 
 their own fate as fubjects, is efientially con- 
 nected with that of the Man whofe doom they 
 are going to decide. 
 
 In fine, fuch is the happy nature pf this in- 
 stitution, that the Judicial Power, a power fo 
 formidable in itfelf, which is to difpofe, without 
 finding any refiftance, of the property, honour, 
 and life of individuals, and which, whatever 
 precautions may be taken to reftrain it, mud 
 in a great degree remain arbitrary, may be faid 
 in England, to exift, to accomplifh every 
 intended end,- and to be in the hands of no- 
 body (a). 
 
 In all thefe obfervations on the advantages 
 
 {a) The confequence of this Institution is, that no 
 Man in England ever meets the Man of whom he may 
 fay, " That Man has a power to decide on my death, 
 -' or life." If we could for a moment forget the advan- 
 tages of that Initiation, we ought at lead to admire the 
 ingenuity of it,
 
 OFENGLAND, 185 
 
 /of the Englifh criminal laws, I have only 
 considered it as connected with the Confli- 
 tution, which is a free one ; and it is in this 
 view alone that I have compared it with the 
 Jurifprudence received in other States. Yet, 
 abstractedly from the weighty constitutional 
 .considerations which I have fuggefted, I think 
 there are {till other interefting grounds of 
 pre-eminence on the fide of the laws of Eng- 
 land. 
 
 In the firft place, they do not permit that a 
 Man mould be made to run the rifque of a trial, 
 but upon the declaration of twelve perfons at 
 leaft (the Grand Jury,) Whether he be in pri- 
 fon, or on his Trial, they never for an inftant 
 refufe free accefs to thofe who have either ad- 
 vice, or comfort, to give him; they even allow 
 him to fummon all who may have any thing 
 to fay in his favour. And laftly, what is of 
 very great importance, the witnefles againfl 
 him muft deliver their teftimony in his pre- 
 fence ; he may crofs-examine them, and, by 
 one unexpected question, confound a whole 
 fyflem of calumny : indulgences thefe, all de- 
 nied by the laws of other Countries. 
 
 Hence, though an accufed perfon may be 
 expofed to have his fate decided by perfons 
 (the Petty Jury) who poSTefs not, perhaps all
 
 jS6 the constitution 
 
 that fagacity which in fome delicate cafes it is 
 particularly advantageous to meet with in a 
 Judge, yet this inconvenience is amply com- 
 penfated by the extenfive means of defence 
 with which the law, as we have feen, has pro- 
 vided him. If a Juryman does not poiTefs that 
 expertnefs which is the refult of long practice, 
 yet neither does he bring to Judgment that 
 hardnefs of heart which is, more or lefs, alfo 
 the confequence of it : and bearing about him 
 the principles, let me fay, the unimpaired in- 
 ftinct of humanity, he trembles while he exer- 
 cifes the awful office to which he finds him- 
 felf called, and in doubtful cafes always de- 
 cides for mercy. 
 
 It is to be farther obferved, that in the 
 ufual courfe of things, Juries pay great 
 regard to the opinions delivered by the Judges : 
 that in thofe cafes where they are clear as to 
 the fact, yet find themfelves perplexed with 
 regard to the degree of guilt connected with 
 it, they leave it, as has been faid before, to be 
 afcertained by the difcretion of the Judge, 
 by returning what is called a Special Verdifl, : 
 that, whenever circumftances feem to alleviate 
 the guilt of a perfon, againft. whom neverthelefs 
 the proof has been pofitive, they temper their 
 verdict by recommending him to the mercy
 
 OF ENGLAND. 187 
 
 of the King ; which feldom fails to produce 
 at leaft a mitigation of the puniihment : 
 that, though a Man once acquitted, can ne- 
 ver under any pretence whatfoever be again 
 brought into peril for the fame offence, yet a 
 new Trial would be granted, if he had been 
 found guilty upon proofs ftrongly fufpe&ed of 
 being falfe (Blackft. b. iv. c. 27.) Laftly, 
 what diftinguiflies the laws of England from 
 thofe of other Countries in a very honourable 
 manner, is, that as the torture is unknown to 
 them, fo neither do they know any more grie- 
 vous punifhment than the fimple deprivation 
 of life. 
 
 All thefe circumftances have combined to 
 introduce fuch a mildnefs into the exercife of 
 criminal Juftice, that the trial by Jury is that 
 point of their liberty to which the people of 
 England are moft thoroughly and univerfally 
 wedded ; and the only complaint I have ever 
 heard uttered againft it, has been by Men 
 who, more fenfible of the neceffity of public 
 order than alive to the feelings of humanity, 
 think that too many offenders efcape with im- 
 punity.
 
 jSS the constitution 
 
 CHAP. XIV. 
 
 *[he Subjeft concluded. Laws relative to 
 
 Imprifonment. 
 
 BUT what completes that fenfe of indepen- 
 dence which the laws of England pro- 
 cure to every individual (a fenfe which is the 
 Dobteft advantage attending liberty) is the 
 greatnefs of their precautions upon the delicate 
 point of Imprifonment. 
 
 In the firft place, by allowing, in mod 
 cafes, of enlargement upon bail, and by pre- 
 ferring, on that article, exprefs rules for the 
 Judges to follow, they have removed all pre- 
 texts which circumftances might afford of de- 
 priving a man of his liberty. 
 
 But it is againft the Executive Power that 
 the Legifiature has, above all, directed its ef- 
 forts : nor has it been but by flow degrees 
 that it has been enabled to wreft from it a 
 branch of power which enabled it to deprive 
 the people of their Leaders, as well as to 
 intimidate thofe who might be tempted to
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 189 
 
 affurae the function ; and which, having thus 
 all the efficacy of more odious means without 
 the dangers of them, was perhaps the mod 
 formidable weapon with which it might attack 
 public liberty. 
 
 The methods originally pointed out by the 
 laws of England for the enlargement of a per- 
 fon unjuftly imprifoned, were the writs of main- 
 prize, de odio & atia, and de bomine replegiando. 
 Thole writs, which could not be denied, were 
 an order to the Sheriff of the County in which 
 a perfon was confined, to inquire into the 
 caufes of his confinement ; and, according to 
 the circumftances of his cafe, either to dis- 
 charge him completely, or upon bail. 
 
 But the mod ufeful method, and which 
 even, by being moil general and certain, has 
 tacitly abolimed all the others, is the writ of 
 Habeas Corpus, fo called becaufe it begins with 
 the words Habeas corpus ad fubjiciendum, This- 
 writ, being a writ of high prerogative, mull 
 iffue from the Court of King's Bench : its 
 tfFefts extend equally to every County ; 
 and the King by it requires, or is under- 
 flood to require, the perfon who holds one of 
 his fubjects in cuftody, to carry him before 
 the Judge, with the date of the confinement,.
 
 !9o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 and the caufe of it, in order to difcharge him* 
 or continue to detain him, according as the 
 Judge (hall decree. 
 
 But this writ, which might be a refource in 
 cafes of violent imprifonment effected by in- 
 dividuals, or granted at their requeft, was but 
 a feeble one, or rather was no refource at all, 
 againfl the prerogative of the Prince, efpecially 
 under the reigns of the Tudors, and in the be- 
 ginning of that of the Stuarts. And even in 
 the firft years of Charles the Firft, the Judges 
 of the King's Bench, who, in confequence of 
 the fpirit of the times, and of their holding 
 their places durante bene placlto x were confhntly 
 devoted to the Court, declared, " that they 
 " could not, upon a Habeas Corpus, either bail 
 " or deliver a prifoner, though committed 
 " without any caufe afiigned, in cafe he was 
 " committed by the fpecial command of the 
 " King, or by the Lords of the Privy Coun- 
 cil." 
 
 Thofe principles, and the mode of proce- 
 dure which refulted from them, drew the 
 attention of Parliament; and in the Aft 
 called the Petition of Right, paffed in the 
 third year of the reign of Charles the Firft, 
 it was enacted, that no perfon fhould be kept
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 191 
 
 in cuftody, in confequence of fuch imprifon- 
 ments. 
 
 But the Judges knew how to evade the in- 
 tention of this Aft : they indeed did not 
 refufe to difcharge a Man imprifoned without 
 a caufe ; but they ufed fo much delay in the 
 examination of the caufes, that they obtained 
 the full effect of an open denial of Juftice. 
 
 The Legiflature again interpofed, and in the 
 Act paffed in the fixteenth year of the reio-n 
 of Charles the Firft, the fame in which the Star- 
 Chamber was fupprefied, it was enacted, that 
 " if any perfon be committed by the King 
 " himfelf in perfon, or by his Privy Council, 
 " or by any of the Members thereof, he mall 
 " have granted unto him, without any delav 
 <c upon any pretence whatfoever, a writ of 
 " Habeas Corpus ; and that the Judge fhall 
 " thereupon, within three Court-days after the 
 " return is made, examine and determine the 
 " legality of fuch imprifonment." 
 
 This Act feemed to preclude every poffi- 
 bility of future cvafion : yet it was evaded 
 ftill ; and, by the connivance of the Judges, 
 the perfon who detained the prifoner could 
 without danger, wait for a fecond, and a third 
 writ, called an Alias and a Pluries, before he 
 produced him,
 
 iq 2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 All thefe different artifices gave at length* 
 birch to the famous Act of Habeas Corpus, 
 paired in the thirtieth year of the reign of 
 Charles the Second, which is confidered in" 
 England as a fecond Great Charter, and has 
 finally fuppreffed all the refources of oppref- 
 fion (a). 
 
 The principal articles of this Act are, to 
 fix the different terms allowed for bringing 
 a priibner : thofe terms are proportioned ttf 
 the diflance ; and none can in any cafe exceed 
 twenty days. 
 
 2. That the Officer and Keeper neglecting 
 to make due returns, or not delivering to the 
 prifoner, or his agent, within fix hours after 
 demand, a copy of the warrant of commit- 
 ment, or fhifting the cuftody of the prifoner 
 from one to another, without fufficient reafon 
 or authority (fpecified in the aft), mall for 
 the firfl offence forfeit one hundred pounds, 
 and for the fecond two hundred, to the 
 party grieved, and be difabled to hold his 
 office. 
 
 (a) The real title of this Aft is, An A3 for better 
 fecuring the Subject > and for Prevention of Imprlfonment be- 
 yond the Seas.
 
 OF ENGLAND. i 93 
 
 3. No perfon, once delivered by Habeas 
 Corpus, fhall be recommitted for the fame of- 
 fence, on penalty of five hundred pounds. 
 
 4. Every perfon committed for treafon or 
 felony, fhall, if he require it, in the firft week 
 of the next term, or the firft day of the 
 next feffion, be indicted in that term or 
 feflion, or elfe admitted to bail, unlefs the 
 King's witnefTes cannot be produced at that 
 time : and if not indicted and tried in the 
 fecond term or feffion, he fhall be difcharged 
 of his imprifonment for fuch imputed of- 
 fence. 
 
 5. Any of the twelve Judges, or the Lord 
 Chancellor, who fhall deny a writ of Habeas 
 Corpus, on fight of the warrant, or on oath, 
 that the fame is refufed, fhall forfeit feverally 
 to the party grieved five hundred pounds. 
 
 6. No inhabitant of England (except per- 
 fons contracting, or convicts praying to be 
 tranfported) fhall be fent priibner to Scot- 
 land, Ireland, Jerfey, Guernfey, or any place 
 beyond the Seas, within or without the King's 
 dominions, on pain, that the party commit- 
 ting, his advifers, aiders, and affiftants, fhall 
 forfeit to the party grieved a fum not lefs 
 than five hundred pounds, to be recovered 
 with treble cofts, fhall be difabled to bear any 
 
 O
 
 i 9 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 office of truft or profit, fhall incur the penal- 
 ties of a praemunire {a), and be incapable of 
 the King's pardon. 
 
 () The Statutes of praemunire, thus called from the 
 writ for their execution, which begins with the words 
 praemunire (for praemotiere^ facias, were Originally defigned 
 to oppofe the ulurpations of the Popes. The firft was 
 pafled under the reign of Edward the Firtl, and has 
 been followed by fcveral others, which even before the 
 Reformation, eitablifhed iuch efFedlual provifions as to draw 
 upon one of them the epithet of F.xecralile Statutum. 
 The offences againlt which thofe Statutes were framed, 
 were likewife diftinguifhed by the appellation of praemunire ; 
 and under that word were included in general all attempts 
 ro promote the 1'ope's authority at r .he expence of the 
 K.ir:g's. The punilhment decreed for fuch cafes, was alfo 
 called a praemunire : it has fince been extended again to 
 feveral other kinds of offence, and amounts to " the im- 
 '*" priionment for life, and forfeiture of all goods and 
 " rents of lands during life."' See Blackitone's Com, 
 book iv ch, b
 
 OF ENGLAND,. 195 
 
 BOOK II. 
 
 CHAP. L 
 
 Some Advantages peculiar to the Englijh Con-' 
 Jiitution. 1. The Unity of the Executive 
 Ptzver. 
 
 WE have feen in former Chapters* the 
 refources allotted to the different parts 
 of the Engliih Government for balancing each 
 other, and how their reciprocal actions and re- 
 actions produce the freedom of the Confti- 
 tution, which is no more than an equilibrium 
 between the ruling Powers of the State. I now 
 propofe to ihew that the particular nature 
 and functions of thefe fame conftituent parts 
 of the Government, which give it fo different 
 an appearance from that of other free States, 
 are moreover attended with peculiar and very 
 great advantages, which have not hitherto 
 been fuinciently obferved. 
 
 O 2
 
 i 9 6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The firft peculiarity of the English Go- 
 vernment, as a free Government, is its hav- 
 ing a King, its having thrown into one 
 place the whole mafs, if I may ufe the ex- 
 preflion, of the Executive Power, and hav- 
 ing invariably and for ever fixed it there. 
 By this very circumftance alfo has the depo- 
 Jitum of it been rendered facred and inexpugn- 
 able ; by making one great, very great 
 Man, in the State, has an effectual check 
 been put to the pretentions of thofe who 
 otherwife would ftrive to become fuch, and 
 diforders have been prevented, which, in all 
 Republics, ever brought on the ruin of liberty, 
 and, before it was loft, obftrudted the enjoyment 
 of it. 
 
 If we cafl our eyes on all the States that 
 ever were free, we fhall fee that the People 
 ever turning their jealoufy, as it was natural, 
 againft the Executive Power, but never think- 
 ing of the means of limiting it that has. fo 
 happily taken place in England {a), never em- 
 ployed any other expedient befides the ob- 
 vious one, of trufling that Power to Magi- 
 ftrates whom they appointed annually ; which 
 
 (a) The rendering that power dependent on the 
 People for its fupplies.*See on this fubjeft Chapter vi, 
 Book I.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 197 
 
 was in great meafure the fame as keeping 
 the management of it to themfclves. Whence 
 it refulted that the People, who, whatever 
 may be the frame of the Government, al- 
 ways poffefs, after all, the reality of power, 
 thus uniting in themfclves with this reality 
 of power the actual exercife of it, in form as 
 well as in fact, conftituted the whole State. 
 In order therefore legally to difturb the 
 whole State, nothing more was requifite than 
 to put in motion a certain number of indivi- 
 duals. 
 
 In a State which is fmall and poor, an ar^ 
 rangement of this kind is not attended with 
 any great inconveniencies, as every individual 
 is taken up with the care of providing for his 
 fubfiftence, as great objects of ambition are 
 wanting, and as evils cannot, in fuch a State, 
 ever become much complicated. In a State 
 that flrives for aggrandifement, the difficulties 
 and danger attending the purfuit of fuch a 
 plan, infpire a general fpirit of caution, and 
 every individual makes a fober ufe of his rights 
 as a Citizen. 
 
 But when, at length, thofe exterior motives 
 come to ceafe, and the paffions, and even the 
 virtues, which they excited, thus become 
 reduced to a Hate of inaction, the People 
 
 O 3
 
 i 9 * THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 turn their eyes back towards the interior of 
 the Republic, and every individual, in feek- 
 ing then to concern himfelf in all affairs, 
 feeks for new objects that may reflore him 
 to that Hate of exertion which habit, he finds, 
 has rendered necelfary to him, and to exercife 
 a mare of power which, fmall as it is, yet flat- 
 ters his vanity. 
 
 As the preceding events mud needs have 
 given an influence to a certain number of 
 Citizens, they avail themfelves of the general 
 difpofition of the people, to promote their pri- 
 vate views : the legislative power is thence- 
 forth continually in motion ; and as it is badly 
 informed and falfely directed, almoft every ex- 
 ertion of it is attended with fome injury either 
 to the Laws, or the State. 
 
 This is not all j as thofe who compofe the 
 
 general Affemblies cannot, in confequence of 
 fc> 
 
 their numbers, entertain any hopes of gratify- 
 in their own private ambition, or in general 
 their own private paffions, they at leaft feek to 
 gratify their political caprices, and they accu- 
 mulate the honours and dignities of the State 
 on fome favourite whom the public voice hap- 
 pens to raife at that time. 
 
 But, as in fuch a State there can be, from 
 the irregularity of the determinations of the
 
 OF ENGLAND. 199 
 
 Pcople ; no fuch thing as a fettled courfe of 
 meafures, it happens that Men never can ex- 
 actly tell the prefent ftate of public affairs. 
 The power thus given away is already grown 
 very great, before thofe for whom it was given 
 fo much as fufpect it; and he himfelf who en- 
 joys that power, does not know its full extent : 
 but then, on the firft opportunity that offers, 
 he fuddenly pierces through the cloud which 
 hid the fummit from him, and at once feats 
 himfelf upon it. The People, on the other 
 hand, no fooner recover light of him, than 
 they fee their Favourite now become their Maf- 
 ter, and difcover the evil, only to find that it is 
 paft remedy. 
 
 As this power, thus furreptitioufly acquired, 
 is deftitute of the fupport both of the law 
 and of the ancient courfe of things, and is 
 even but indifferently refpedted by thofe who 
 have fubjected themfelves to it, it cannot be 
 maintained but by abufing it. The People at 
 length fuccecd in forming fomewhere a centre 
 of union ; they agree in the choice of a 
 Leader ; this Leader in his turn rifes ; in his 
 turn alfo he betrays his engagements ; power 
 produces its wonted effects ; and the Protector 
 becomes a Tyrant. 
 
 O4
 
 200 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 This is not all ; the fame caufes which have 
 given a Mafter to the State, give it two, give 
 it three. AU thofe rival powers endeavour to 
 fvvallow up each other j the State becomes a 
 fcene of endlefs quarrels and broils, and is in 
 a continual convulfion. 
 
 If amidft fuch diforders the People retained 
 their freedom, the evil mufl indeed be very 
 great, to take away all the advantages of it; 
 but they are Haves, and yet have not what in 
 other Countries makes amends for political fer r 
 vitude, I mean tranquillity. 
 
 In order to prove all thefe things, if proofs 
 were deemed neceffary, I would only refer the 
 reader to what every one knows of Pififtratus 
 and Megacles, of Marius and Sylla, of Csfar 
 and Pompey. However, I cannot avoid tranf- 
 lating a part of the fpeech which a Citizen of 
 Florence addreffed^ once to the Senate : the 
 reader will find in it a kind of abridged ftory 
 of all Republics ; at leaft of thofe which, by 
 the fliare allowed to the People in the Govern- 
 ment, deferved that name, and which, befides, 
 have attained a certain degree of extent and 
 power. 
 
 u And that nothing human may be per- 
 " petual and liable, it is the will of Heaven.
 
 OF ENGLAND, 201 
 
 " that in all States whatfoever, there ihould 
 P arife certain deftructive families, who are 
 " the bane and ruin of them. Of this our 
 " own Republic afford? as many and more de- 
 f* plorable examples than any other, as it owes 
 " its misfortunes not only to one, but to fevc- 
 " ral fuch families. We had at firft the Buon- 
 f ( delmonti and the Huberti, We had afterwards 
 U the Donati and the Cercbi ; and at prefent, 
 " (fhameful and ridiculous conduct ! ) we are 
 " waging war among ourfelves for the Ricci and 
 " the Albizzi. 
 
 " When in former times the Ghibelins 
 f c were fuppreffed, every one expedited that 
 <c the Guelfs, being then fatisfied, would have 
 f c chofen to live in tranquillity ; yet, but a 
 e( little time had elapfed, when they again 
 i( divided themfelves into the factions of the 
 Whites and the Blacks. When the Whites 
 *' were fuppreffed, new parties arofe, and new 
 < e troubles followed. Sometimes battles were 
 ec fought in favour of the Exiles ; and at other 
 " times, quarrels broke out between the No- 
 cc bility and the People. And, as if refolved 
 " to give away to others what we ourfelves 
 *f neither could, nor would, peaceably enjoy, 
 p we committed the care of our liberty
 
 102 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 " fometimes to King Robert, and at other times 
 *' to his brother, and at length to the Duke 
 ** of Athens ; never fettling nor refting in any 
 <l kind of Government, as not knowing ei- 
 "ther how to enjoy liberty, or fupport fervi- 
 ' tude -(a)" 
 
 The Engliih Conftitution has prevented 
 the poffibility of misfortunes of this kind. 
 Not only by diminifhing the power, or ra- 
 ther the aftual exercife of the power, of the 
 People (b), and making them (hare in the 
 Legiflature only by their Reprefentatives, the 
 irreiiitible violence has been avoided of thole 
 numerous and general Afiemblies, which, on 
 whatever fide they throw their weight, bear 
 down every thing. Beiides, as the power of 
 the People, when they have any kind of power, 
 and know how to ufe it, is at all times really 
 formidable, the Conftitution has let a coun- 
 terpoife to it; and the Royal authority is this 
 counterpoife. 
 
 [a) See the Hiitory of Florepce, by Machiavel. 
 lib. iii. 
 
 (&) We (hall fee in the fequel, that this diminution oi 
 the exercife of the power of the People has been attended, 
 with i great increafe of their liberty.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 203 
 
 In order to render it equal to fuch a tafk, the 
 Conftitution has, in the firft place, conferred on 
 the King, as we have feen before, the exclufive 
 prerogative of calling and difmifling the legif- 
 lative Bodies, and of putting a negative on 
 their refolutions. 
 
 Secondly, it has alfo placed on the fide of 
 the King the whole Executive Power in the 
 Nation, 
 
 Laftly, in order to effed dill nearer an 
 equilibrium, the Conftitution has inverted 
 the Man whom it has made the fole Head 
 of the State, with all the perfonal privileges, 
 all the pomp, all the majefty, of which hu~ 
 man dignities are capable. In the language 
 of the law, the King is Sovereign Lord, and 
 the People are his fubjects; he is univerfal 
 proprietor of the whole Kingdom; he be- 
 llows all the dignities and places ; and he is 
 not to be aqMrefied but with the exprefiions 
 and outward ceremony of almoft Eaftern 
 humility. Befides, his perfon is facred and 
 inviolable ; and any attempt whatfoever a- 
 gainft it, is, in the eye of the law, a crime 
 equal to that of an attack againft the whole 
 State. 
 
 In a word, fince, to have too exactly com- 
 pleted the equilibrium between the power
 
 2.04 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 of the People, and that of the Crown, would 
 have been to iacrifice the end to the means, 
 that is, to have endangered liberty with a 
 view to ftrengthen the Government, the defi- 
 ciency which ought to remain on the fide 
 of the Crown, has at lead been the appearance 
 made up, by conferring on the King all 
 that fort of flrength that may refult from 
 the opinion and reverence of the people ; 
 and amidft the agitations which are the 
 unavoidable attendants of liberty, the Royal 
 power, like an anchor that refills both by 
 its weight and the depth of its hold, in* 
 lures a falutary Iteadinefs to the vefTel of the 
 State, 
 
 The greatnefs of the prerogative of the 
 King, by its thus procuring a great degree 
 of liability to the State in general, has much 
 leffened the pofllbility of the evils we have above 
 defcribed ; it has even, we may fay, totally pre- 
 vented them, by rendering it impoflible for 
 any Citizen even, to rife to any dangerous 
 greatnefs. 
 
 And to begin with an advantage by which 
 the people eafily fuller themfelves to be in- 
 fluenced, I mean that of birth, it is impofTi- 
 ble for it to produce in England effects in 
 any degree dangerous ; for though there are
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 205 
 
 Lords who, befides their wealth, may alio 
 boaft of an illuftrious defcent, yet that ad- 
 vantage, being expofed to a continual com- 
 panion with the fplendor of the Throne, 
 dwindles almoft to nothing; and in the gra- 
 dation univerfally received of dignities and 
 titles, that of Sovereign Prince and King places 
 him who is inverted with it, out of all degree 
 of proportion. 
 
 The Ceremonial of the Court of Ens-land 
 is even formed upon that principle. Thofe 
 perfons who are related to the King, have the 
 title of Princes of the blood, and, in that 
 quality, an indifputed pre-eminence over all 
 other perfons (a). Nay, the firft Men in the 
 Nation think it an honourable diftn&icn to 
 themfelves, to hold the different menial offices, 
 or titles, in his Houfnold. If we therefore were 
 to fet aiide the extenfive and real power of 
 the King, as well as the numerous means he 
 pofleffes of gratifying the ambition and hopes 
 of individuals, and were to confider only the 
 Majefty of his title, and that kind of flrength 
 founded on public opinion, which refults from 
 
 () This, by Stat, of the 31ft of Hen. VIII. ex- 
 tends to the fons, grandfons, brothers, uncles, snd ne- 
 phews, of the reigning King, 
 
 2
 
 2o6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 it, we fliould find that- advantage fo consider- 
 able, that to attempt to enter into a competition 
 with it, with the bare advantage of high birth^ 
 which itfelf has no other foundation than 
 public opinion, and that too in a very Subor- 
 dinate degree, would be an attempt completely 
 extravagant. 
 
 If this difference is fo great as to be tho- 
 roughly fubmitted to, even by thofe perfons 
 whole Situation might incline them to difown 
 it, much more does it influence the minds of 
 the people. And if, notwithstanding the value 
 which every Englishman ought to fet upon him- 
 felf as a Man, and a free Man, there were any 
 whofe eyes were lb very tender as to be dazzled 
 by the appearance and the arms of a Lord, they 
 would be totally blinded when they came to 
 turn them towards the Royal Majefly. 
 
 The only Man, therefore, who, to thofe who 
 are unacquainted with the Conftitution of Eng- 
 land, might at fir ft fight appear in a condition 
 to put the Government in danger, would be a 
 Man who, by the greatnefs of his abilities and 
 public Services, might have acquired in a high 
 degree the love of the people, and obtained a 
 great influence in the Houfe of Commons. 
 
 But how great Soever this enthufiafm of 
 the public may be, barren applaufe is the only
 
 OF ENGLAND. 207 
 
 fruit which the Man whom they favour can 
 expect from it. He can hope neither for a 
 Dictatorfhip, nor a Confulfhip, nor in general 
 for any power under the ihelter of which 
 he may at once fafely unmafk that ambition 
 with which we might fuppofe him to be actu- 
 ated,- or, if we fuppofe him to have been 
 hitherto free from any, grow infenfibly corrupt. 
 The only door which the Conflitution leaves 
 open to his ambition, of whatever kind it may 
 be, is a place in the adminiftration, during 
 the pleafure of the King. If, by the con- 
 tinuance of his fervices, and the prefcrvation 
 of his influence, he becomes able to aim ftill 
 higher, the only door which again opens to 
 him, is that of the Houfe of Lords. 
 
 But this advance of the favourite of the 
 people towards the eftablifhment of his grcat- 
 nefs, is at the fame time a great flep towards 
 the lofs of that power which might render him 
 formidable. 
 
 In the fir ft place, the People feeing that 
 he is become much lefs dependent on their 
 favour, begin, from that very moment, to 
 leflen their attachment to him. Seeing him 
 moreover diftinguifhed by privileges which 
 are the object of their jealoufy, I mean their 
 political jealoufy, and member of a body
 
 208 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 whofe interefts are frequently oppofite to their's, 
 they immediately conclude that this great and 
 new dignity cannot have been acquired but 
 through a fecret agreement to betray them. 
 Their favourite, thus fuddenly transformed, 
 is going, they make no doubt, to adopt a 
 conduct entirely oppofite to that which has 
 till then been the caufe of his advancement 
 and high reputation, and, in the compafs of a 
 few hours, completely renounce thofe principles 
 which he has fo long and fo loudly profeiTed. 
 In this certainly the People are miitaken ; 
 but yet neither would they be wrong, if they 
 feared that a zeal hitherto fo warm, fo conftant, 
 I will even add, fo fincere, when it concurred 
 with their Favourite's private intereM, would, 
 by being thenceforth often in oppofition to it, 
 become gradually much abated. 
 
 Nor is this all ; the favourite of the people 
 does not even find in his new acquired dignity, 
 all the increafe of greatnefs and eclat that 
 might at fir ft be imagined. 
 
 Hitherto he was, it is true, only a private 
 individual ; but then he was the object in 
 which the whole Nation interefled themfelves j 
 his actions and words were fct forth in the 
 public prints ; and he every where met with 
 applaufe and acclamation*
 
 OF ENGLAND, aoo 
 
 All thefe tokens of public favour are, I 
 know, fometimes acquired very lightly ; but 
 they never laft long, whatever people may fay, 
 nnlefs real fervices are performed ; now, the 
 title of Benefactor to the Nation, when de- 
 ferved, and univerfally bellowed, is certainly 
 a very handfome title, and which does no-wife 
 require the affiftance of outward pomp to fet it 
 off. Befides, though he was only a Member 
 of the inferior body of the Legiflature, we 
 muft obferve, he was the firft; and the "word 
 firji is always a word of very great moment* 
 
 But now that he is made Lord > all his great- 
 nefs, which hitherto was indeterminate, be* 
 comes defined. By granting him privileges efla- 
 blilhed and fixed by known laws$ that uncer- 
 tainty is taken from his luftre which is of fo 
 much importance in thofe things which depend 
 on imagination; and his value is lowered, juft 
 becaufe it is afcertained. 
 
 Befides, he is a Lord ; but then there are 
 feveral Men who poflefs but fmall abilities, 
 and few eftimable qualifications, who alio are 
 Lords ; his lot is, neverthelefs, to be feated 
 among them; the law places him exactly on the 
 fame level with them ; and all that is real in his 
 greatnefs, is thus loll in a croud of dignities, 
 hereditary and conventional, 
 
 P
 
 2io THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Nor are thefe the only lofTes which the 
 favourite of the People is to fuffer. Indepen- 
 dently of thofe great changes which he defcries 
 at a diflance, he feels around him alterations 
 no lcis vifible, and ftill more painful. 
 
 Seated formerly in the Aflembly of the Re- 
 prefentatives of the People, his talents and con- 
 tinual fuccefs had foon railed him above the le- 
 vel of his fellow Members; and, being carried 
 on by the vivacity and warmth of the public 
 favour, thofe who might have been tempted to 
 fet up as his competitors, were reduced to 
 filence, or even became his fupporters. 
 
 Admitted now into an Aflembly of perfons 
 invefled with a perpetual and hereditary title, 
 he finds Men hitherto his fuperiors, Men 
 who fee wit-h a jealous eye the mining talents 
 of the homo novus, and who are firmly refoived, 
 that after having been the leading Man in the 
 Houfe of Commons, he mail not be the fir ft 
 in their's. 
 
 In a word, the fuccefs of the favourite of 
 the People was brilliant, and even formid- 
 able ; but the Conftitution, in the very reward 
 it prepares for him, makes him find a kind of 
 Oftracifm. His advances were fudden, and 
 his courfe rapid ; he was, if you pleafe, like a 
 torrent ready to bear down every thing before
 
 OF ENGLAND. 211 
 
 it; but this torrent is compelled, by the ge- 
 neral arrangement of things, finally to throw 
 itfelf into a vaft refervoir, where it mingles, 
 and lofes its force and direction. 
 
 I know it may be faid, that, in order to 
 avoid the fatal Hep which is to deprive him of 
 fo many advantages, the favourite of the People 
 ought to refufe the new dignity which is offered 
 to him, and wait for more important fucceffes, 
 from his eloquence in the Houfe of Commons, 
 and his influence over the People. 
 
 But thofe who give him this counfel, have 
 not fufficiently examined it. Without doubt 
 there are Men in England, who in their pre- 
 fent purfuit of a project which they think 
 effential to the public good, would be capable 
 of refuting for a while a dignity which would 
 deprive their virtue of opportunities of exert- 
 ing itfelf, or might more or lefs endanger 
 it : but woe to him who mould perfift in 
 fuch a refufal, with any pernicious defign ! 
 and who, in a Government where liberty is 
 eftablifhed on fo folid and extenfive a bafis, 
 fhould endeavour to make the People believe 
 that their fate depends on the perfevering vir- 
 tue of a fingle Citizen. His ambitious views 
 being at laft difcovered (nor could it be long 
 before they were fo), his obftinate refolu- 
 
 P 2
 
 i THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 lution to move out of the ordinary courfe of 
 things, would indicate aims, on his part, of 
 fuch an extraordinary nature, that all Men 
 whatever, who have any regard for their Coun- 
 try, would inftantly rife up from all parts to 
 oppofe him, and he muft fall, overwhelmed 
 with fo much ridicule, that it would be better 
 for him to fall from the Tarpeian rock (a). 
 
 In fine, even though we were to fuppofc 
 that the new Lord might, after his exalta- 
 tion, have preferved all his intereft with the 
 People, or, what would be no lefs difficult, 
 that any Lord whatever could, by dint of his 
 wealth and high birth, rival the fplendor of 
 the Crown itfelf, all thefe advantages, how 
 great foever we may fuppofe them, as they 
 
 [a) The Reader will perhaps object that no Man in 
 England can poflibly entertain fuch views as thofe I have 
 fuggefted here : this is precifely what I intended to prove. 
 The effential advantage of the Engliih Government 
 above all thofe that have been called free, and which in 
 many refpedls were but apparently fo, is, that no perfon 
 in England can entertain fo much as a thought of his 
 ever riling to the level of the Power charged with the 
 execution of the Laws. All Men in the State, what- 
 ever may be their rank, wealth, or influence, are tho- 
 ro uglily convinced that they muft in reality as well 2.% 
 *n name, continue to be Subjects ; and are thus compell- 
 ed really to love, to defend, and to promote, thofe laws 
 which fecure the liberty of the Subject. This latter ob* 
 fcrratien will be again introduced in the feque! v
 
 OF ENGLAND. 213 
 
 would not of themfelves be able to confer on 
 him the leaft executive authority, mud for ever 
 remain mere fhowy unfubftantial advantages. 
 Finding all the active powers in the State con- 
 centered in that very feat of power which we 
 fuppofe him inclined to attack, and there fecured 
 by formidable provisions, his influence muft al- 
 ways evaporate in ineffectual words ; and after 
 having advanced himfelf, as we fuppofe, to the 
 very foot of the Throne, finding no branch of 
 independent power which he might appropriate 
 to himfelf, and thus at laft give a reality to his 
 political importance, he would foon fee it, how- 
 ever great it might have at fir ft appeared, decline 
 and die away. 
 
 God forbid, however, that I fhould mean, 
 that the People of England are fo fatally tied 
 clown to inaction, by the nature of their Govern- 
 ment, that they cannot, in times of oppreffion, 
 find means of appointing a Leader. No ; I 
 only meant to fay that the laws of England 
 open no door to thofe accumulations of power, 
 which have been the ruin of fo many Repub- 
 lics ; that they offer to the ambitious no poffi- 
 ble means of taking advantage of the inad- 
 vertence, or even the gratitude, of the People^ 
 to make themfelves their Tyrants ; and that the 
 public power, of which the King has been madq 
 
 ?4
 
 2i 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the exclusive depofitary, muft remain unfhaken 
 in his hands, fo long as things continue to keep 
 in the legal order ; which, it may be obferved, 
 is a ftrong inducement to him conftantly to en- 
 deavour to maintain them in it (a). 
 
 (a) There are feveral events, in the Englifh Hiftory, 
 which put in a very ftrong light this idea of the liability 
 which the power of the Crpwn gives to the State. 
 
 One, is the facility with which the great Duke of 
 Marlborough, and. his party at home, were removed from 
 their feveral employments. Hannibal, in circumftances 
 nearly fimilar, had continued the war againft the will of 
 the Senate of Carthage : Casfar had done the fame in 
 Gaul ; and when at laft he was exprefsly required to de- 
 liver up his commiffion, he marched his army to Rome, 
 and eftablifhed a military defpotifm. But the Duke, 
 though furrounded, as well as the above named Generals, 
 by a v.clorious army, and by Allien in conjun&ion with 
 whom he had carried on fuch a fuccefsful war, did not 
 even hefitate to furrcnder his commiiTion. He knew that 
 all his folciers were infeparably prepoffeffed in favour of 
 that Power so-a'-nft which he muft have revolted : he 
 knew that the fame prepoffeffions were deeply rooted in 
 the minds of the whole Nation, and that every thing 
 among them concurred to fupport the fame Power: he- 
 knew that the very nature of the claims he muft have fet 
 up, would inftantly have made all his Officers and Cap- 
 tains turn themfelves againft him, and, in fhort, that in 
 an enterprize of that nature, the arm of the fea he had to 
 repafs, was the fmalleft of the obftacles he would have to 
 encounter. 
 
 The other event I fhall mention here, is that of the Re- 
 volution of 1689. If the long eltabiifhed power of the 
 Crown had not beforehand prevented the people frpru
 
 OF ENGLAND, 215 
 
 CHAP. II. 
 
 The Subjecl concluded. The Executive Pozver is 
 
 more eafily confined when it is one. 
 
 ANOTHER great advantage, and which 
 one would not at firft expect, in this unity 
 of the public power in England, in this union, 
 and, if I may fo exprefs myfelf, in this coacer- 
 vation, of all the branches of the Executive 
 authority, is the greater facility it affords of 
 retraining it. 
 
 In thole States where the execution of the 
 laws is intruded to feveral different hands, 
 and to each with different titles and prero- 
 gatives, fuch divifion, and the changeablenefs 
 of meafures which muft be the confequence 
 of it, conftantly hide the true caufe of the 
 evils of the State : in the endlefs fluctuation 
 of things, no political principles have time 
 to fix among the People : and public mil- 
 
 accuftoming themfelves to fix their eyes on fome par- 
 ticular Citizen?, and in general had not prevented all 
 Men in the Stare from attaining any too confiderable de- 
 gree of power and greatnefs, the expulfion of James II, 
 might have been followed by events fimilar to thofe which 
 took place at Rome after the death of Cajfar. 
 
 ?4
 
 2i6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fortunes happen, without ever leaving behind 
 them any ufeful lefTon. 
 
 At fometimes military Tribunes, and at 
 others, Confuls bear an abfolute iway ; forne^ 
 times Patricians ufurp every thing, and at other 
 
 times, thofe who are called Nobles (a); 
 
 fometimes the People are opprefled by Decem- 
 virs, and at others by Dictators, 
 
 Tyranny, in fuch States, does not always 
 beat down the fences that are fet around it; but 
 it leaps over them. When men think it con- 
 fined to one place, it Harts up again in another j 
 it mocks the efforts of the People, not be- 
 caufe it is invincible, but becaufe it is unknown; 
 feized by the arm of a Hercules, it efcapes 
 with the changes of a Proteus. 
 
 But the indivisibility of the Public power 
 in England has conftantly kept the views and 
 efforts of the People directed to one and the 
 fame object; and the permanence of that power 
 
 [a) Ths capacity of being admitted to all places of 
 public truth at length gained by the Plebeians, having ren- 
 dered ufelefs the old diltinclion between them and the 
 patricians, a coalition was then effected between the 
 great Plebeians, or Commoners, who got into thefe places, 
 and the ancient Patricians : Hence a new Clafs of Men 
 arofe, who were called Nobiles and Nobilitas. Thefe ar 
 the words by which Livy, after that period, conitantly 
 diftinguilhes thofe Men and families who were at ths 
 head of the State.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 217 
 
 has alfo given a permanence and a regularity 
 to the precautions they have taken to reilrain 
 it. 
 
 Conftantly turned towards that ancient for- 
 trefs, the Royal power, they have made it, for 
 ieven centuries, the object of their fear ; with a 
 watchful jealoufy they have confidered all its 
 parts they have oblerved all its outlets they 
 have even pierced the earth to explore its fecret 
 avenues, and fubterraneous works. 
 
 United in their views by the greatnefs of the 
 danger, they regularly formed their attacks. 
 They eftablifhcd their works, mil at a diftance ; 
 then brought them fucceflively nearer ; and, 
 in fihort, railed none but what ferved afterwards 
 as a foundation or defence to others. 
 
 After the great Charter was eltabliihed 5 
 forty fucc^ffive confirmations itrcngthened it. 
 The Aft called the Petition of Right, and that 
 panned in the fixteenth year of Charles the Firft, 
 then followed : fome years after, the Habeas 
 Corpus Act was eftablifhed ; and the Bill of 
 Rights made at length its appearance. In fine, 
 whatever the circumftances may have been, 
 they always had, in their efforts, that inefti- 
 mable advantage of knowing with certainty 
 the general feat of the evils they had to defend 
 themfelves againft; and each calamity, each
 
 21S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 particular eruption, by pointing out fome weak 
 place, has ever gained a new bulwark to public 
 Liberty. 
 
 To fay all in three words ; the Executive 
 power in England is formidable, but then it 
 is for ever the fame ; its refources are vafl, 
 but their nature is at length known ; it has 
 been made the indivifible and inalienable at- 
 tribute of one perfon alone, but then all other 
 perfons, of whatever rank or degree, become 
 really interefted to reftrain it within its proper 
 bounds (d). 
 
 CHAP. III. 
 
 A feccnd Peculiarity. The Divifion of the Legif- 
 
 lat'we Tower. 
 
 TH E fecond peculiarity which England, 
 as an undivided State and a free State, 
 exhibits in its Conftitution, is the divifion of 
 its Legiflature. But, in order to make the 
 
 (a) This laft advantage of the greatnefs and indivifibi- 
 lity of the executive power, viz. the obligation it lays 
 upon the greater! Men in the State, fincerely to unite in a 
 common caufe with the people, will be more amply dif- 
 cuffed hereafter, when a more particular comparifon be- 
 ween the Englifh Government and the Republican form, 
 tall be offered to the Reader,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 219 
 
 reader more fenfible of the advantages of this 
 division, it is neceffary to defire him to attend 
 to the following confederations. 
 
 It is, without doubt, abfolutely neceffar) r , 
 for fecuring the Conftitution of a State, to re- 
 train the Executive power; but it is ilill more 
 neceffary to reftrain the Legiflative. What 
 the former can only do by fucceffive ftcps (I 
 mean fubvert the laws) and through a longer 
 or fhorter train of enterprizes, the latter does 
 in a moment. As its bare will can give being 
 to the Jaws ; fo its bare will can alfo annihilate 
 them : and, if I may be permitted the cxpref- 
 (ion, the Legislative power can change the 
 Conftitution, as God created the light. 
 
 In order therefore to infure (lability to the 
 Conftitution of a State, it is indifpenfably 
 neceffary to reftrain the Legiflative authority. 
 But here we muft obferve a difference between 
 the Legiflative and Executive powers. The 
 latter may be confined, and even is the more 
 eafily fo, when undivided : the Legiflative, 
 on the contrary, in order to its being re- 
 flrained, mould ablblutely be divided. For, 
 whatever laws it may make to reftrain itfelf, 
 they never can be, relatively to it, any thing 
 more than fimple refolutions : as thofe bars 
 which it might erect to flop its own motions,
 
 S 20 THE CONSTITUTION 1 
 
 muff then be within it, and reft upon it, they 
 can be no bars. In a word, the fame kind oi 
 impoflibility is found, to fix the Legislative 
 power when it is one, which Archimedes ob- 
 jected againfl his moving the Earth (a). 
 
 Nor does fuch a division oi theLegifiature only 
 vender it pofhble for it to be refcrained, Since 
 each of thofe parts into which it is divided, can 
 then ferve as a bar to the motions of the others ; 
 but it even makes it to be actually fo retrained. 
 If it has been divided into only two parts, it is 
 probable that they will not in ail cafes unite, 
 either for doing, or undoing ; it it has been divid- 
 ed into three parts, the chance that no changes 
 will be made, is thereby greatly increafed. 
 
 Nay more ; as a kind ot point of honour will 
 naturally take place between thefe different parts 
 of the Legiilative, they will therefore be led to 
 offer to each other only fuch proportions as will 
 at lead be plaufible ; and all very prejudicial 
 changes will thus be prevented, as it were, 
 before their birth. 
 
 If the Legislative and Executive powers 
 differ fo greatly with regard to the neceflity of 
 their being: divided, in order to their being- re- 
 Strained, they differ no lefs with regard to the 
 other confequences arifing from fuch division, 
 
 {a) He wanted a fpot whereupon to fix his inftruments.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 221 
 
 The divifion of the Executive power necef- 
 farily introduces actual oppofitions, even violent 
 ones, between the different parts into which 
 it has been divided ; and that part which 
 in the iffue fucceeds fo far as to abforb, and 
 unite in itfelf, all the others, immediately 
 fets itfelf above the laws. But thofe oppofi- 
 tions which take place, and which the public 
 good requires fhould take place, between the 
 different parts of the Lcgiflature, are never 
 any thing more than oppofitions between con- 
 trary opinions and intentions ; all is tranfacted 
 in the regions of the underftanding ; and the 
 only contention that arifes is wholly carried 011 
 with thofe inoffenfive weapons, afients and dil- 
 fents, ayes and noes, 
 
 Beficles, when one of thefe parts of the Lc- 
 giflature is fo fuccefsful as to engage the others 
 to adopt its proportion, the refult is, that a 
 law takes place which has in it a great proba- 
 bility of being good : when it happens to be 
 defeated, and fees its proportion rejected, the 
 worft that can refult from it is, that a law is 
 not made at that time ; and the lofs which the 
 State fuffers thereby, reaches no farther than 
 the temporary fetting aiide of fome more or lefs 
 ufeful fpeculation. 
 
 3
 
 22* THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In a word, the refult of a divifion of the 
 Executive power, is either a more or lefs fpeedy 
 eftablifhment of the right of the Jlrongejl, or a 
 continued ftate of war {a) : that of a divifion 
 of the Legiflative power, is either truth, or 
 general tranquillity. 
 
 The following maxim will therefore be ad- 
 mitted. That the laws of a State may be per- 
 manent, it is requifite that the Legiflative 
 power mould be divided : that they may have 
 weight, and continue in force, it is neceffary 
 that the Executive power mould be one. 
 
 If the reader conceived any doubt as to the 
 truth of the above obfervations, he need only 
 call his eyes on the hiftory of the proceedings 
 of the Englifh Legiflature down to our times, 
 to find a proof of them. He would be fur- 
 prifed to fee how little variation there has 
 been in the political laws of this Country, ef- 
 pecially during the laft hundred years, though, 
 it is moll: important to obferve, the Legif- 
 lature has been as it were in a continual 
 
 (a) Every one knows the frequent hoftilities that took 
 place between the Roman Senate and the Tribunes. In 
 Sweden there have been continual contentions between 
 the King and the Senate, in which they have over- 
 powered each other by turns. And in England, when 
 the Executive power became double, by the King al- 
 lowing the Parliament to have a perpetual and indepen- 
 dent exigence, a civil war almoft immediately followed.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 223 
 
 ftate of action, and, no difpaffionate Man 
 will deny, has generally promoted the public 
 good. Nay, if we except the Act palled under 
 William III. by which it had been enacted, 
 that Parliaments fhould fit no longer than three 
 years, and which was repealed by a fubfequent 
 Act, under George I. which allowed them to 
 fit for feven years, we mall not find that any 
 law, which may really be called Constitutional, 
 and which has been enacted fince the Reftora- 
 tion, has been changed afterwards. 
 
 Now, if we compare this fteadinefs of the 
 Englifh Government with the continual fub- 
 verfions of the Conftitutional laws of fome an- 
 cient Republics, with the imprudence of fome 
 of the laws paffed in their affemblies (#), and 
 with the ftill greater inconfideratenefs with 
 which they fometimes repealed the mod fa- 
 lutary regulations, as it were the day after 
 they had been enacted, if we call to mind 
 the extraordinary means to which the Legis- 
 lature of tho'e Republics, at times fenfible 
 how its very power was prejudicial to itfelf and 
 to the State, was obliged to have recourle, in 
 
 (a) The Athenians, among other laws, had enacted 
 one to forbid applying a certain part of the public re- 
 venues to any other ufe than the expences of the 
 Theatres and public Shews,
 
 224 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 order, if poffible, to tie its own hands (a), 
 we fhall remain convinced of the great advan- 
 tages which attend the Conflitution of the 
 Engliih Legiflature (). 
 
 Nor is this divifion of the Englifh Legifla- 
 ture accompanied (which is indeed a very for* 
 tunate circumftance) by any actual divifion of 
 the Nation : each conflituent part of it pof- 
 ieffes ftrength fufficient to infure refpect to its 
 refolutions, yet no real divifion has been made 
 of the forces of the State. Only a greater 
 proportional fhare of all thofe diflinctions 
 which are calculated to gain the reverence of 
 the People, has been allotted to thofe parts of 
 the Legiflature which could not poflefs their 
 
 (a) In fome ancient Republics, when the Legiflature 
 wifhed to render a certain law permanent, and at the 
 fame time miitrufted their own future wifdom, they added 
 .. claufe to it, which made it death to propofe the revo- 
 cation of it. Thofe who afterwards thought fuch revo- 
 cation neceffary to the public welfare, relying on the 
 mercy of the People, appeared in the public Affembly 
 with an halter about thei. necks. 
 
 {'') We fhall perhaps have occafion to obferve, here- 
 aftc, that the true caufe of the equability of the operations 
 of the Englifh Legiflature, is the oppofnion that happily 
 takes place between the different views and interefts of 
 ihe leveral bodies that compofe it : a confederation this, 
 without whkh all political inquiries are no more than 
 airy fpeculations, and is the only one that can lead to 
 uieful practical concluficns.
 
 OFENGLAND. 225 
 
 confidence, in fo high a degree as the others ; 
 and the inequalities in point of real ftrength be- 
 tween them, have been made up by the magic 
 of dignity. 
 
 Thus, the King, who alone forms one part 
 of the Legiflature^ has on his fide the ma- 
 jelly of the kingly title : the two Houfes 
 are, in appearance, no more than Councils 
 entirely dependent on him ; they are bound to 
 follow his perfon; they only meet, as it feems, 
 toadvifehim; and never addrefs him but in 
 the moll folemn and refpedtful manner. 
 
 As the Nobles, who form the fecond or- 
 der of the Legiflature, bear, in point both of 
 real weight and numbers, no proportion to the 
 body of the People (a), they have received 
 
 [a) It is for want of having duly confidered this fub- 
 jett, that Mr. RoufTeau exclaims, fomewhere, againlt. 
 thofe who, when they fpeak of General Eftates of France, 
 " dare to call the people, the third Eftate." At Rome, 
 where all the order we mention was inverted, where 
 the fafces were laid down at the feet of the People, 
 and where the Tribunes, whofe function, like that of 
 the King of England, was to eppofe the eftablifhmert 
 of new laws, were only a fubordinate kind of Ma- 
 <*}ftracy, many diforders followed. In Sweden, and in 
 Scotland (before the union), faults of another kind pre- 
 vailed : in the former kingdom, for inftance, an over- 
 grown body of two thoufand Nobles frequently over-ruled 
 both King and People.
 
 226 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 as a compenfation, the advantage of perfonal 
 honours, and of an hereditary title. 
 
 Befides, the eftablifhed ceremonial gives to 
 their Aflembly a great pre-eminence over that 
 of the Reprefentatives of the People. They 
 are the upper Houfe, and the others are the 
 lower Houfe. They are in a more fpecial man- 
 ner confieJered as the King's Council, and it is 
 in the place where they affemble that his 
 Throne is placed. 
 
 When the King comes to the Parliament, 
 the Commons are fent for, and make their ap- 
 pearance at the bar of the Houfe of Lords. 
 It is moreover before the Lords, as before 
 their Judges, that the Commons bring their 
 impeachments. When, after pafling a bill 
 in their own Houfe, they fend it to the Lords 
 to defire their concurrence, they always order 
 a number of their own Members to accompany 
 it {a) : whereas the Lords fend down their 
 bills to them, only by fome of the Affiftants 
 of their Houfe (b). When the nature of the 
 
 [a) The Speaker of the Houfe of Lords muft come 
 down from the woolpack to receive the bills which the 
 Members of the Commons bring to their Houfe. 
 
 (b) The twelve Judges and the Matters in Chancery. 
 There is alfo a ceremonial eftablittied with regard to the 
 manner, and marks of refpeft, with which thofe two of 
 them, who are fent with a bill to the Commons, are re- 
 deliver it.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 227 
 
 alterations which one of the two Houfes de- 
 fires to make in a bill fent to it by the other, 
 renders a conference between them neceffary, 
 the Deputies of the Commons to the Com- 
 mittee which is then formed of Members 
 of both Houfes^ are to remain uncovered. 
 Laftly, thofe bills which (in whichever of the 
 two Houfes they have originated) have been 
 agreed to by both, mult be depofited in the 
 Houfe of Lords, there to remain till the Royal 
 pleafure is iignified. 
 
 Befides, the Lords are Members of the 
 Legiflature by virtue of a right inherent in their 
 perfons, and they are fuppofed to fit in Parlia- 
 ment on their own account^ and for the fup- 
 port of their own interefls. In confequence 
 of this they have the privilege of giving their 
 votes by proxies (a) ; and, when any of them 
 diffent from the refolutions of their Houfe, they 
 may enter a proteft againft them, containing 
 the reafons of their particular opinion. In a 
 word, as this part of the Legiflature is deftined 
 frequently to balance the power of the People., 
 what it could not receive in real itrength, 
 it has received in outward fplendor and great- 
 
 {a) The Commons have not that privilege, becaufs 
 they are themfelves proxies for the People, See Coke 3 
 Inft. iv. p. 41. 
 
 O 2
 
 22 3 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 nefs ; fo that, when it cannot refill by its. 
 weight, it overawes by its apparent magni- 
 tude. 
 
 In fine, as thefe various prerogatives by 
 which the component parts of the Legiilature 
 are thus made to balance each other, are all 
 intimately connected with the fortune of State, 
 and flourifh and decay according to the viciffi- 
 tudes of public prosperity or adverfity, it thence 
 follows, that, though differences of opinions may 
 at fome times take place between thofe parts, 
 there can fcarcelv arife anv, when the general 
 welfare is really in queflion. And when, to 
 refolve the doubts that may arife in political 
 {peculations of this kind, we caff our eyes on 
 the debates of the two Houfes for a long fuc- 
 ceffion of years, and fee the nature of the 
 laws which have been propofed, of thofe which 
 have parTed, and of thofe which have been 
 rejected, as well as of the arguments that have 
 been urged on both fides, we fhall remain con- 
 vinced of the goodnefs of the principles on 
 which the Englifh Legiilature is formed,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 229 
 
 CHAP. IV. 
 
 A third Advantage peculiar to the EngUJh Govern* 
 ment. The Bujinefs of propojing Laws, lodged 
 in the Hands of the people. 
 
 A Third circumftance which I propofe to 
 ftiow to be peculiar to the Englifh Go- 
 vernment, is the manner in which the refpec- 
 tive offices of the three component parts of the 
 Legiflature have been divided, and allotted to 
 each of them. 
 
 If the Reader will be pleafed to obferve, he 
 will find that in mod of the ancient free States, 
 the fhare of the People in the bufinefs of Le- 
 giflation, was to approve, or reject, the pro- 
 portions which were mad to them, and to give 
 the final fanction to the laws. The function 
 of thofe Perfons, or in general thofe Bodies, 
 who were intrufted with the Executive power, 
 was to prepare and frame the Laws, and then 
 to propofe them to the People : and in a word, 
 they poffefTed that branch of the Legiilative 
 power which may be called the initiative, that 
 is, the prerogative of putting that power in 
 action (a), 
 
 (a) This power of previoufly confidering and approv- 
 ing fuch laws as were afterwards to be propounded to 
 
 Q-3
 
 2 3 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 This initiative, or exclulive right of pro- 
 pofing, in Legiflative afTemblies, attributed tq 
 the Magiftrates, is indeed very ufeful, and per- 
 haps even neceffary, in States of a republican 
 form, for giving a permanence to the laws, as 
 well as for preventing the diforders and flrug- 
 gles for power which have been mentioned be- 
 fore ; but upon examination we mail find that 
 this expedient is attended with inconveniences 
 of little lefs magnitude than the evils it is 
 meant to remedy. 
 
 the People, was, in the firft times of the Roman Re- 
 public, copftantly exercifed by the Senate : laws were 
 made, Populi jujfu, ex aucloritate Senatus. Even in cafes 
 of elections, the previous approbation and autloritas of 
 the Senate, with regard to thofe perfons who were of- 
 fered to the fufFrages of the People, was required. Turn 
 enim non gerebat is magijlratum qui ceperat, Ji Patres auc- 
 tores non erant faEii. Cic. pro Plancio, 3. 
 
 At Venice the Senate alfo exercifes powers of the fame 
 kind, with regard to the Grand Council or Aflembly of 
 the Nobles. In the Canton of Bern, all proportions muft 
 be difcuffed in the Little Council, which is compofed of 
 twenty-feven Members, before they are laid before the 
 Council of the Two hundred, in whom refides the fo- 
 yereignty of the whole Canton. And in Geneva, the law 
 is, that nothing fhall be treated in the General Council, 
 * or Affembly of the Citizens, which has not been pre- 
 f vioufly treated and approved in the Council of the 
 ' Two hundred ; and that nothing fhall be treated in the 
 *' Two hundred, which has not been previoufly treated 
 "' and approved in the Council of the Twenty -Jive,' 1
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 23 
 
 Thefe Magiflrates, or Bodies, at firft indeed 
 apply frequently to the Legiflature for a grant 
 of fuch branches of power as they dare not of 
 themfelves affume, or for the removal of fuch 
 obflacles to their growing authority as they 
 do not yet think it fafe for them peremptorily 
 to fet afide. But when their authority has at 
 length gained a fufBcient degree of extent and 
 {lability, as farther manifestations of the will 
 of the Legiflature could then only create ob- 
 structions to the exercife of their power, they 
 begin to confider the Legiflature as an enemy 
 whom they muft take great care never to roufe. 
 They confequently convene the AfTembly 
 of the People as feldom as they can. When 
 they do it, they carefully avoid proposing 
 any thing favourable to public liberty. Soon 
 they even entirely ceafe to convene the AfTem- 
 bly at all ; and the People, after thus lofing 
 the power of legally afferting their rights, are 
 cxpofed to that which is the highefl degree of 
 political ruin, the lofs of even the remem- 
 brance of them , unlets fome indirect means 
 are found, by which they may from time to 
 time give life to their dormant privileges ; 
 means which may be found, and fucceed 
 pretty well in fmall States, where provifions 
 can more eafily be made to anfwer their m- 
 
 O A
 
 232 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 tended ends, but in States of confiderable ex- 
 tent, have always been found, in the event, 
 to give rife to diforders of the fame kind with 
 thofe which v/ere at fjrft intended to be pre- 
 vented. 
 
 But as the capital principle of the Englifh 
 Conftitution totally differs from that which 
 forms the bafis of Republican Governments, 
 b is it capable of procuring to the People 
 advantages that are found to be unattain- 
 able in the latter. It is the People in Eng- 
 land, or at leafl thofe who reprefeqt them, 
 who po fiefs the initiative in Legislation, that 
 is to fay, who perform the office of framing 
 laws, and propofmg them. And among the 
 many circumitances in the Englifh Govern- 
 ment, which would appear entirely new to the 
 Politicians of antiquity, that of feeing the 
 perfon intruded with the Executive power bear 
 that fhare in Legislation which they looked 
 upon as being necefTarily the lot of the People, 
 and the People that which they thought the 
 indifpenfable office of its Magiftrates, would not 
 certainly be the leafl occafion of their furprize. 
 
 I forefee that it will be objected, that, as 
 the King of England has the power of dif- 
 folving, and even of not calling Parliaments, 
 lie is hereby poilefled of a prerogative which
 
 OF ENGLAND. 233 
 
 in fact is the fame with that which I have juft 
 now reprefented as being fo dangerous. 
 
 To this I anfwer, that all circumstances 
 ought to be combined together. Doubtlefs, if 
 the Crown had been under no kind of depen- 
 dence whatever on the people, it would long 
 fince have freed itfelf from the obligation of 
 calling their Reprefentatives together ; and the 
 Britifh Parliament, like the National AfTem- 
 blies of feveral other Kingdoms, would moll 
 likely have no existence now, except in Hiftory. 
 
 But, as we have above feen, the neceffities 
 of the State, and the wants of the Sovereign 
 himfelf, put him under a neceffity of having 
 frequently recourfe to his Parliament ; and then 
 the difference may be feen between the prero- 
 gative of not calling an AfTembly, when power- 
 ful caufes neverthelefs render fuch a meafure 
 neceffary, and the exclufive right, when an Af- 
 fembly is convened, of propofing laws to it. 
 
 In the latter cafe, though a Prince, let us 
 even fuppofe, in order to fave appearances, 
 might condefcend to mention any thing be- 
 tides his own wants, it would be at molt to 
 propofe the giving up of fome branch of his 
 prerogative upon which he fet no value, or to 
 reform fuch abufes as his inclination does not 
 lead him to imitate; but he would be very
 
 234 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 careful not to touch any points which might 
 materially affect his authority. 
 
 Befides, as all his conceffions would be 
 made, or appear to be made, of his own mo- 
 tion, and would in fonie meafure feem to fpring 
 from the activity of his zeal for the public wel- 
 fare, all that he might offer, though in fact 
 ever fo inconfiderable, would be reprefented 
 by him as grants of the moil important na- 
 ture, and for which he expects the highefl gra- 
 titude. Laftly, it would alfo be his province 
 to make reflections and exceptions to laws 
 thus propofed by himfelf ; he would alfo be 
 the per fon who were to chufe the words to ex- 
 prefs them, and it would not be reafonable to 
 expect that he would give himfelf any great 
 trouble to avoid all ambiguity (a). 
 
 {a) In the beginning of the exigence of the Houfe of 
 Commons, bills were prefented to the King under the 
 form of Petitions. Thofe to which the King affented 4 
 were regiflered among the rolls of Parliament, with his 
 anfwer to them ; and at the end of each Parliament, the 
 Judges formed them into Statutes. Several abufes hav- 
 ing crept into that method of proceeding, it was or- 
 dained that the Judges fhould in future make the Sta 
 tute before the end of every Sefiion. Ladly, as ever, 
 that became, in procefs of time, infufheient, the prefer.: 
 method of framing bills was eflablifhed ; that is to fay, 
 both Houfes now frame the Statutes in the very form 
 and words in which they are to Hand when they have 
 received the Roval aJlent.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 235 
 
 But the Parliament of England is not, as 
 we faid before, bound down to wait paifively, 
 and in filence for fuch laws as the Executive 
 power may condefcend to propofe to them. 
 At the opening of every Seffion, they of them- 
 felves take into their hands the great book of 
 the State ; they open all the pages, and ex- 
 amine every article. 
 
 When they have difcovered abufes, they 
 proceed to enquire into their caufes : when 
 thefe abufes arife from an open difregard 
 of the laws, they endeavour to ftrengthen 
 them ; when they proceed from their infuffi- 
 ciency, they remedy the evil by additional pro- 
 vifions (V). 
 
 {a) No popular Affembly ever enjoyed the privilege 
 of flatting, canvafling, aud proposing new matter, to 
 fuch a degree as the Englifh Commons. In France, 
 when their General Eftates were allowed to fit, their 
 remonjlrcmces were little regarded, and the particular 
 Eltates of the Provinces dare now hardly prefent any. 
 In Sweden, the Power of propofing new fubjects was 
 lodged in an AiTembly called the Secret Committee, com- 
 pofed of Nobles, and a few of the Clergy ; and is now 
 poffeffed by the King, In Scotland, until the Union, 
 all propofitions to be laid before the Parliament, were to 
 be framed by the perfons called the Lords of the Articles \ 
 In regard to Ireland, all bills mull be prepared by 
 the King in his Privy Council, and are to be laid before 
 the Parliament by the Lord Lieutenant, for their af- 
 fnt or diffent : only, they are allowed to difcufs, among 
 ihem, what they c;.ll Heads of a Bill, which the Lord
 
 ztf THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Nor do they proceed with lefs regularity and 
 freedom, in regard to that important object, 
 fubfidies. They are to be the fole Judges of 
 the quantity of them, as well as of the ways 
 and means of raifing them ; and they need not 
 come to any refolution with regard to them, till 
 they fee the fafety of the Subject completely 
 provided for. In a word, the making of laws, 
 is pot, .in fuch an arrangement of things, a gra- 
 tuitous contract, in which the People are to take 
 jufl what is given them, and as it is given them : 
 
 it is a contract in which they buy and pay, 
 
 and in which they themfelves fettle the different 
 conditions, and furnifh the words to exprefs 
 them. 
 
 The Englim Parliament have given a Hill 
 greater extent to their advantages on fo im- 
 portant a fubject. They have not only fe- 
 cured to themfelves a right of propofmg laws 
 and remedies, but they have alfo prevailed 
 
 Lieutenant is defired afterwards to tranfmlt to the King, 
 who feletts out of them what claufes he thinks proper, 
 or fets the whole afide ; and is not expe&ed to give at 
 <iny time, any precife anfwer to them. And in repub- 
 lican Governments, Magiftrates are never at reft till 
 they have entirely fecured to themfelves the important 
 privilege of fropof.ng ; nor does this follow merely from 
 their ambition ; it is alfo the confequence of the fituatiou 
 they are in, from the principles of that mode of Govern 
 ment.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 237 
 
 on the Executive power to renounce all claim 
 to do the fame. It is even a conftant rule that 
 neither the King nor his Privy Council, can 
 make any amendments to the bills preferred by 
 the two Houfes ; but the King is merely to ac- 
 cept or reject them : a provifion this, which, 
 if we pay a little attention to the fubjedt, we 
 fhall find to have been alio neceffary for com- 
 pletely fecuring the freedom and regularity of 
 the parliamentary deliberations (#). 
 
 I indeed confefs that it fcems very natural, 
 in the modelling of a State, to intruft this 
 very important office of framing laws, to 
 thofe perfons who may be fuppofed to have 
 
 {a) The King indeed at times fends meffages to either 
 Houfe ; and nobody, I think, can wifh that no means of 
 intercourfe mould exift between him and his Parliament. 
 But thefe mefiages are always exprefied in very general 
 words : they are only made to defire the Houfe to take 
 certain fubje&s into their confideration ; no particular ar- 
 ticles or claufes are exprefied ; the Commons are not to 
 declare, at any fettled time, any folemn acceptation or 
 rejection of the propofition made by the King ; and, in 
 fhort, the Houfe follows the fame mode of proceeding, 
 with refpeft to fuch mefTages, as they ufually do in regard 
 to petitions prefented by private individuals. Some Mem- 
 ber makes a motion upon the fubjeft exprefied in the 
 King's meflage ; a bill is framed in the ufual way ; it 
 may be dropt at every ftage of it ; and it is never the 
 propofal of the Crown, but the motions of fome of their 
 own Members, which the Houfe difcufs, and finally ac- 
 cept or rejeft.
 
 n 
 
 % THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 before acquired experience and wifdom, in the 
 management of public affairs. But events have 
 unfortunately demonflrated, that public era- 
 ployments and power improve the underfland- 
 ing of Men in a lefs degree than they pervert 
 their views ; and it has been found in the iffue 
 that the effect of a regulation which, at firft 
 light, feems fo perfectly confonant with pru- 
 dence, is to confine the People to a mere paf- 
 five and defenfive fhare in Legiflation, and to 
 deliver them up to the continual enterprizes 
 of thofe who, at the fame time that they are 
 under the greatefl temptations to deceive them^ 
 pofTefs the moil powerful means of effecting 
 it. 
 
 If we call our eyes on the Hiflory of the 
 ancient Governments, in thofe times when 
 the perfons entrufled with the Executive power 
 were Hill in a flate of dependence on the Le- 
 giflature, and confequently frequently obliged 
 to have recourfe to it, we fhall fee almofl con- 
 tinual inftances of felfifh and infidious laws 
 propofed by them ro the Aflemblies of the 
 people. 
 
 And thofe Men in whofe wifdom the law 
 had at fir ft placed fo much confidence, be- 
 came, in the iffue, fo loll to all fenfe of 
 fhame and duty, that when arguments were 
 found to be no longer fufficicnt, they had
 
 OF ENGLAND* 239 
 
 recourfe to force; the legiflative AfTemblies 
 became fo many fields of battle, and their 
 power, a real calamity. 
 
 I know very well, however, that there are 
 other important circumstances befides thofe 
 I have juft mentioned, which would prevent 
 diforders of this kind from taking place in Eng- 
 land (a). But, on the other hand, let us call to 
 mind that the perfon who, in England, is in- 
 verted with the Executive authority, unites in 
 himfelf the whole public power and majefty. 
 Let us reprefent to ourfelves the great and fole 
 Magiftrate of the Nation, preffing the accept- 
 ance of thofe laws w r hich he had propofed, 
 with a vehemence fuited to the ufual importance 
 of his defigns, with the warmth of Monarchical 
 pride, which mult meet with no refufal, and 
 exerting for that purpofe all his immenfe re- 
 four ces. 
 
 It was therefore a matter of indifpenfable 
 necemty, that things mould be fettled in Eng- 
 land in the manner they are. As the moving 
 fprings of the Executive power are, in the 
 hands of the King, a kind of facred depofitum, (& 
 
 [a] I particularly mean here, the circumftance of the 
 People having entirely delegated their power to their Re- 
 prefentatives : the confequences of which Inftkution will 
 be difcuffed in the rext Chapter.
 
 2 4 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 are thofe'of the Legillative Power in the hands' 
 of the two Houfes. The King muit abftain 
 from touching them, in the fame manner as all 
 the fubjects of the kingdom are bound to fub- 
 mit to his prerogatives. When he fits in' Parli- 
 ament, he has left, v/e may fay, his execu- 
 tive power without doors, and can only affent 
 or diffent. If the Crown had been allowed to 
 take an active part in the buiinefs of making 
 laws, it would foon have rendered ufelefs the 
 other branches of the Legiflature. 
 
 CHAP. V. 
 
 In which an Inquiry is made, whether it would be 
 an Advantage to public Liberty, that the Laws 
 JJjould be enatted by the Votes of the People at 
 large. 
 
 U T it will be faid, whatever may be 
 the wifdom of the Englifh Laws, how 
 great foever their precautions may be with 
 regard to the fafety of the individual, the 
 People, as they do not themfelves exprefsly enact 
 them, cannot be looked upon as a free People. 
 Th Author of the Social Contrail carries this opi' 
 3
 
 OF ENGLAND. 241 
 
 mon even farther ; he fays, that, " though 
 ii the people of England think they arc free, 
 cc they are much miftaken ; truy are fo only 
 " during the election of Members for Par- 
 " liament : as foon as thefe are elected, the 
 " People are flavesr they are nothing (a)" 
 
 Before I anfwer this objection, I fhall ob- 
 ferve, that the word Liberty is one of thofe 
 which have been mofl mifunderftood or mis- 
 applied. 
 
 Thus, at Rome, where that clafs of Citi- 
 zens who were really Matters of the State, 
 were fenfible that a lawful regular authority, 
 once trufted to a fingle Ruler, would put an 
 end to their tyranny, they taught the People 
 to believe, that, provided thofe who exercifed 
 a military power over them, and overwhelmed 
 them with infults, went by the names of 
 Confides, Diulatores, Patricii, Nobiks, in a 
 word, by any other appellation than that 
 horrid one of Rex, they were free, and that 
 fuch a valuable fituation muft be preferred 
 at the price of every calamity. 
 
 In the fame manner, certain Writers of 
 the prefent age, milled by their inconsiderate 
 admiration of the Governments of ancient 
 
 {a) See M, Rouffeau's Social Contract, chap. xv. 
 
 R
 
 242 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 times, and perhaps alfo by a defire of preferr- 
 ing lively contrails to what they call the de- 
 generate manners of our modern times, have 
 cried up the governments of Sparta and Rome, 
 as the only ones fit for us to imitate. In 
 their opinions, the only proper employment 
 of a free Citizen is, to be either inceffantly af- 
 fembled in the forum, or preparing for war. Be- 
 ing valiant, inured to hardjbips, inflamed with an 
 ardent love of one's Country, which is, after all, 
 nothing more than an ardent defire of injur- 
 ing all Mankind for the fake of that Society 
 of which we are Members and zvith an ardent 
 love of glory, which is likewife nothing more 
 than an ardent defire of committing Slaugh- 
 ter, in order to make afterwards a boaft of it, 
 have appeared to thefe Writers to be the only 
 focial qualifications worthy of our efteem, and 
 of the encouragement of law-givers (a). And 
 while, in order to fupport fuch opinions, they 
 have ufed a profufion of exaggerated expref- 
 fions without any diftindt meaning, and perpe- 
 tually repeated, though without defining them, 
 the words dajlardlinefs, corruption, greatnefs of 
 
 (a) I have ufed all the above exprefiions in the fame 
 fenfe in which they were ufed in the ancient Commoa- 
 wealths, and Mill are by moll of the Writers who defcribe 
 tbeir Governments.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 243 
 
 foul, and virtue, they have never once thought 
 of telling us the only thing that was worth our 
 knowing, which is, whether men were happy 
 under thofe Governments which they fo much 
 exhorted us to imitate. 
 
 Nor, while they thus mifapprehended the 
 only rational defign of civil Societies, have 
 they better underftood the true end of the par- 
 ticular inftiturions by which they were to be 
 regulated. They were fatisfied when they favv 
 the few who really governed every thing in 
 the State, at times perform the illulbry cere- 
 mony of affembling the body of the People, 
 that they might appear to confult them : and 
 the mere giving of votes, under any difadvan- 
 tage in the manner of giving them, and 
 how much foever the law might afterwards 
 be negledted that was thus pretended to have 
 been made in common, has appeared to them 
 to be Liberty. 
 
 But thofe Writers are in the right ; ' a 
 Man who contributes by his vote to the 
 palling of a law, has himfelf made the law ; 
 in obeying it, he obeys himfelf, he there- 
 fore is free, A play on words, and no- 
 thing more. The individual who has voted 
 in a popular legiilative AfTembly, has not 
 
 R z
 
 244 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 made the law that has palled in it; he has 
 only contributed^ or feemed to contribute, to- 
 wards enacting it, for his thousandth, or even 
 ten thoufandth fhare : he has had no oppor- 
 tunity of making his objections to the pro- 
 poicd law, or of canvafiing it, or of propos- 
 ing reitrictions to it, and he has only been 
 allowed to cxprefs his afient, or diffent. When 
 a law is paffed agreeably to his vote, it is 
 not as a confequence of this his vote, that 
 his will happens to take place; it is becaufe 
 a number of other Men have accidentally 
 thrown themfelves on the fame fide with 
 him: when a law contrary to his intentions 
 is enacted, he mud neverthelefs fubmit to 
 it. 
 
 This is not all ; for though we mould 
 fuppofe that to give a vote is the effential 
 constituent of liberty, yet, fuch liberty could 
 only be faid to lafl for a fingle moment, after 
 which it becomes neccfiary to trull entirely 
 to the diferetion of other perfons, that is, ac- 
 cording to this doctrine, to be no longer free. 
 It becomes neceffary, for inftance, for the Ci- 
 tizen who has given his vote, to rely on the 
 honeily of thole who collect the fufTr^y 
 and more than once have falfe declarations been 
 made of them.
 
 OF ENGLAND. iy D 
 
 The Citizen mufl alfo truft to other per- 
 fons for the execution of thofe things which 
 have been refolved upon in common : and 
 when the affembly fhall have feparated, and 
 he fhall find himfelf alone, in the prefence 
 of the Men who are invefted with the public 
 power, of the Confuls, for inftance, or of the 
 Dictator, he will have but little fecurity for 
 the continuance of his liberty, if he has only 
 that of having contributed by his fuffrage to- 
 wards enacting a law which they are determined 
 to neglect. 
 
 What then is Liberty ? Liberty, I would 
 anfwer, fo far as it is poffible for it to exiit 
 in a Society of Beings whofe interefts are 
 almoft perpetually oppofed to each other, 
 confifts in this, that, every Man, zvhile he re- 
 fpebls the perfons of others, and allozvs them 
 quietly to enjoy the produce of their indvfiry, 
 be certain himfelf likezvife to enjoy the pro- 
 duce of his own indujlry, and that his per- 
 fin be alfo fecure. But to contribute by one's 
 fuffrage to procure thefe advantages to the 
 Community, to have a fhare in eftablifhing 
 that order, that general arrangement of things, 
 by means of which an individual, loft as it 
 were in the croud, is effectually protected, 
 to lay down the rules to be obferved bv thofe
 
 a 4 6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 xvho, being in veiled with a confiderable power, 
 are charged with the defence of individuals, 
 and provide that they Ihould never tranfgrefs 
 them, thefe are functions, are acts of Go- 
 vernment, but not conflituent parts of Li- 
 berty. 
 
 To exprefs the whole in two words : To 
 concur by one's fuffrage in enacting laws, is 
 to enjoy a mare, whatever it may be, of Power : 
 ro live in a ft ate where the laws are equal for 
 all, and lure to be executed (whatever may be 
 the means by which thefe advantages are at- 
 tained) is to be free. 
 
 Be it (q; we grant that to give one's fuf- 
 frage is not liberty itfelf, but only a means of 
 procuring it, and a means too which may de- 
 generate to mere form ; we grant alfo_> that 
 it is pofiible that other expedients might be 
 found for that purpofe, and that, for a Man to 
 decide that a State with whofe Government 
 and interior adminiflration he is unacquainted, 
 is a State in which the People are Jlaves, 
 are nothing, merely becaufe the Conritia of an- 
 cient Rome are no longer to be met with 
 in it, is a fcmewhat precipitate decifion. 
 But ftill wc muft continue to think, that li- 
 berty would be much more complete, if the 
 People at large were exprefsly called upon to
 
 OF ENGLAND, 247 
 
 give their opinion concerning the particular 
 provisions by which it is to be fecured, and 
 that the Englifh laws, for inftance, if they were 
 made by the fuffrages of all, would be wifer, 
 more equitable, and, above all, more likely to 
 be executed. To this objection, which is 
 certainly fpecious, I mall endeavour to give an 
 anfwer. 
 
 If, in the firft formation of a civil Society, 
 the only care to be taken was that of eftablim- 
 ing, once for all, the feveral duties which 
 every individual owes to others, and to the 
 State, if thofe who are intruded with the 
 care of procuring the performance of thefe 
 duties, had neither any ambition, nor any 
 other private paffions, which fuch employ- 
 ment might put in motion, and furnifh the 
 means of gratifying ; in a word, if looking 
 upon their function as a mere talk of duty, 
 they were never tempted to deviate from the 
 intentions of thofe who had appointed them ; 
 I confefs that in fuch a cafe, there might be 
 no inconvenience in allowing every individual 
 to have a fhare in the government of the com- 
 munity of which he is a member; or rather 
 I ought to fay, in fuch a Society, and among 
 fuch Beings, there would be no occafion for 
 any Government. 
 
 R 4
 
 2 4 3 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But experience teaches us that many mors 
 precautions, indeed, ' are neceffary to oblige 
 Men to be jufl towards each other ; nay, the 
 very fir ft expedients that may be expected to 
 conduce to fuch an end, fupply the moll fruit- 
 ful fourcc of the evils which are propofed 
 to be prevented. Thofe laws which were 
 intended to be equal for all, are foon warped 
 to the private convenience of thofe who have 
 been made the adm ini fixators of them : in- 
 flituted at firft for the protection of all, they 
 foon are made only to defend the ufurpations 
 of a few ; and as the People continue to re- 
 flect them, while thofe to whofe guardian- 
 fhip they were intrufled make little account 
 of them, they at length have no other effect 
 than that of fupplying the want of real ftrength 
 in thofe few who have contrived to place 
 themfelves at the head of the community, and 
 of rendering regular and free from danger the 
 tyranny of the fmaller number over the greater. 
 
 To remedy, therefore, evils which thus 
 have a tendency to refult from the very na- 
 ture of things, to oblige thofe who are in a 
 manner Mailers of the law, to conform them- 
 felves to it, to render ineffectual the filent, 
 powerful, and ever active confpiracy of thofe 
 who govern, requires a degree of knowledge,
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 249 
 
 tmd a fpirit of prefeverance, which are not to 
 be expected from the multitude. 
 
 The greater part of thole who compofe 
 this multitude, taken up with the care of pro- 
 viding for their fubfiltence, have neither fuf- 
 ficient leifure, nor even, in confequence of 
 their more imperfect education, the degree of 
 information requifite for functions of this 
 kind. Nature, befides, who is fparing of 
 her gifts, has bellowed upon only a few Men 
 an understanding capable of the complicated 
 refearches of Legiflation ; and, as a fick Man 
 trufts to his Phyfician, a Client to his Lawyer, 
 fo the greater number of the Citizens mult 
 truft to thofe who have more abilities than 
 themfelves for the execution of things which, 
 at the fame time that they lb materially 
 concern them, require fo many qualifications 
 to perform them with any degree of fufri- 
 ciency. 
 
 To theie confiderations, of themfelves fo 
 material, another rauft be added, which is 
 if pomble of ftill greater weight. This is, that 
 the multitude, in confequence of their very 
 being a multitude, are incapable of coming to 
 any mature refolution. 
 
 Thofe who compofe a popular Aflembly 
 are not actuated, in the courfe of their de-
 
 lS o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 liberations, by any clear and precife view of 
 any prefent or pofitive perfonal intereft. As 
 they fee themfelves loll as it were in the croud 
 of thofe who are called upon to exercife the 
 fame function with themfelves, as they know 
 that their individual votes will make no change 
 in the public refolution, and that, to whatever 
 fide they may incline, the general refult will 
 neverthelefs be the fame, they do not under- 
 take to enquire how far the things propofed 
 to them agree with the whole of the laws 
 already in being, or with the prefent circum- 
 ftances of the State, becaufe Men will not en- 
 ter upon a laborious tafk, when they know 
 that it can fcarcely anfwer any purpofe. 
 
 It is, however, with difpofitions of this kind, 
 and each relying on all,' that the AfTembly of 
 the People meets. But as very few among 
 them have previously confidered the fubjedts 
 on which they are called upon to determine, 
 very few carry along with them any opinion or 
 inclination, or at leaft any inclination of their 
 own, and to which they are refolved to ad- 
 here. As however it is neceffary at lad to come 
 to fome refolution, the major part of them 
 are determined by reafons which they would 
 blufh to pay any regard to., on much lefs fe-
 
 OFENGLAND. 251 
 
 rious occasions. An unufual fight, a change 
 of the ordinary place of the Afiembly, a fud- 
 den difturbaace, a rumour, are, a mid ft the ge- 
 neral want of a fpirit of decifion, the fifficiens ratio 
 of the determination of the greateft part (#) ; 
 and from this affemblage of feparate wills, 
 thus formed haftily and without reflection, a 
 general will refults, which is alfo void of re- 
 flection. 
 
 If, amidft thefe difadvantages, the Afiemblv 
 were left to themfelves, and no body had an 
 intereft to lead them into error, the evil, 
 though very great, would not however be 
 extreme, becaufe fuch an aiTembly never being 
 called upon but to determine upon an affirmative 
 or negative, that is, never having but two cafes 
 to choofe between, there would be an equal 
 chance for their choofing either ; and it might 
 be hoped that at every other turn they would 
 take the right fide. 
 
 But the combination of thofe who fhare ei- 
 ther in the actual exercife of the public Power, 
 
 (a) Every one knows of how much importance it was 
 in the Roman Commonwealth, to affemble the People, 
 in one place rather than another. In order to change 
 entirely the nature of their refolutions, it was often 
 fufficient to hide from them, or let them fee, the Capitol. 
 
 3
 
 i S z THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 or in its advantages, do not thus allow them* 
 felves to fit down in inaction. They wake, 
 while the People fleep. Entirely taken up with 
 the thoughts of their own power, they live but. 
 to increafe it. Deeply verfed in the manage- 
 ment of public bufmefs, they fee at once all 
 the poflible confequences of meafures. And 
 as they have the exclusive direction of the 
 fprings of Government, they give rife, at 
 their pleafure, to every incident that may 
 influence the minds of a multitude who are 
 not on their guard, and who wait for fomc 
 event or other that may finally determine 
 them. 
 
 It is they who convene the Affemblv, and 
 diffolvc it ; it is they who offer proportions, 
 and make fpceches to it. Ever active in turn- 
 ing to their advantage every circumftance 
 that happens, they equally avail themfelves 
 of the tractablenefs of the People during pub- 
 lic calamities, and its heedleffnefs in times 
 of profperity. When things take a differ- 
 ent turn from what they expected, they dif- 
 mifs the Affemblv. By prefenting to it ma- 
 ny proportions at once, and which arc to 
 be voted upon in the lump, they hide what 
 is deftined to promote their own private views, 
 or give a colour to it, by joining it with things 
 which thev know will take hold of the mind
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 2$. 
 
 of the People (a). By preferring in their 
 fpeeches, arguments and fads, which Men have 
 no time to examine, they lead the People into 
 grofs, and yet decifive errors ; and the common- 
 places of rhetoric, fupported by their perfonal 
 influence, ever enable them to draw to their 
 fide the majority of votes. 
 
 On the other hand, the few (for there 
 are, after all, fome) who, having meditated 
 on the propofed cpaeftion, fee the confcquences 
 of the decifive ftep which is juft going to 
 be taken, being loll in the croud, cannot 
 make their feeble voices to be heard in the 
 midfl of the univerfal noife and confufion. 
 They have it no more in their power to Hop 
 the general motion, than a Man in the midft 
 of 'an army on a march, has it in his power 
 to avoid marching. In the mean time, the 
 People are giving their fuffrages ; a majority 
 
 [a) It was thus the Senate, at' Rome, afTumed to itfelf 
 the power of laying taxes. They promifed, in the time of 
 the war againfl the Veientes, to give pay to fuch Citizens 
 as would inlift : and to that end they eftabliih a tribute. 
 The people, folely taken up with the idea of not going to 
 war at their own expence, were tianfported with fo much 
 joy, that they crouded at the door of the Senate, and lay- 
 ing hold of the hands of the Senators, called them their 
 
 Fathers Nihil unquam acceptum a plebe tanto gandio tradi- 
 
 tur : concur/urn itaque Curiam eJTe, preber.fatafque excu;:tium 
 viflniU) Patres "jere appellatos, sfc. See Tit. Li\\ book iv,
 
 254 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 appears in favour of the propofal ; it is finally 
 proclaimed as the general will of all ; and it is 
 at bottom nothing more than the effect of the 
 artifices of a few defigning Men, who are ex- 
 ulting among themfelves (a). 
 
 (a) I might confirm all thefe things by numberlefs in- 
 stances from ancient Hiftory ; but, if I may be allowed, in 
 this cafe, to draw examples from my own'Country, cjf cele- 
 brare domejlica facia, I {hall relate fails which will be no 
 lefs to the purpofe. In Geneva, in the year 1707, a law 
 was enadled, that a General Affembly of the People fhould 
 be held eveiy five years, to treat of the affairs of the Re- 
 public ; but the Magiftrates, who dreaded thofe Affem- 
 blies, foon obtained from the Citizens themfelves the re- 
 peal of the law ; and the firft refolution of the People, 
 in the firft of thefe periodical AfTemblies (in the year 171 2) 
 was to abolifh them for ever. The profound fecrecy with 
 which the Magiftrates prepared their propofal to the Ci- 
 tizens on that fubjeft, and the fudden manner in which 
 the latter, when afiembled, were acquainted with it, and 
 made to give their votes upon it, have indeed accounted 
 but imperfectly for this ftrange determination of the Peo- 
 ple ; and the confternation which feized the whole Affem- 
 bly when the refult of the fuffrages was proclaimed, has 
 confirmed many in the opinion that fome unfair means had 
 been ufed. The whole tranfa&ion has been kept fecret to 
 this day ; but the common opinion on this fubject, which 
 has been adopted by M. Rouffeau in his Lettres de la 
 Montagnt, is this : the Magiftrates, it is faid, had pri- 
 vately inftrufted the Secretaries in whofe ears the Citizens 
 were to ivbifper their fuffrages : when a Citizen faid, ap- 
 probation, he was underftood to approve the propofal of 
 the Magiftrates ; when he faid, rejection^ he was underftood 
 ;o reject the periodical JJJemblies,
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 255 
 
 In a word, thofe who are acquainted with 
 Republican Governments, and, in general, who 
 know the manner in which bufinefs is tranf- 
 acted in numerous Affemblies, will not fcruple 
 to affirm, that the few who are united to- 
 gether, who take an active part in public 
 affairs, and whofe ftation makes them con- 
 In the year 1738, the Citizens enacted at once into laws 
 a fmall Code of forty-four Articles, by one fingle line 
 of which they bound themfelves for ever to eleft the four 
 Syndics (the Chiefs of the Council of the Twenty-five) out 
 of the Members of the fame Council ; whereas they were 
 before free in their choice. They at that time fuffered 
 alfo the word approved to be flipped into the law mentioned 
 in the Note (a) p. 185, which was tranfcribed from a for- 
 mer Code ; the confequence of which was to render the 
 Magistrates abfolute mailers of the Legiflature. 
 
 The Citizens had thus been fuccefiively dripped of all 
 their political rights, and had little more left to them than 
 the pleaiure of being called a Sovereign JJjembly, when 
 they met (which idea, it mull be confeffed, preferved 
 among them a fpirit of rcfiftance which it would have 
 been dangerous for the Magiftrates to provoke too far), 
 and the power of at leafl; refufing to eleft the four Syn- 
 dics. Upon this privilege the Citizens have, a few years 
 ago, (A. 1755, to 1 ; 68.) made their laft ft and : and a 
 lingular conjunction of circumftances having happened at 
 the fame time, to raife and preferve' among them, during 
 three years, an uncommon fpirit of union and perfeverance, 
 they have in the iffue fucceeded in a great meafure to re- 
 pair the injuries which they had been made to do to them- 
 felves, for thefe laft two hundred years and more. (J total 
 change has fine e that time been ajfetled by foreign forces, in 
 the Government of the Republic (A. 1782) upon which thif, 
 is not a proper place te make anj obfcrvaticn.J
 
 2i 6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fpicuous, have fuch an advantage over the 
 many who turn their eyes towards them, and are 
 without union among themfelves, that, even 
 with a middling degree of ikill, they can at all 
 limes direct, at their pleafure, the general refo- 
 lutions; that, as a confequencc of the very 
 nature of things, there is no propofal, however 
 abfurd, to which a numerous aflembly of Men 
 may not, at one time or other, be brought to 
 affent; and that laws would be wifer, and 
 more likely to procure the advantage of all, if 
 they were to be made by drawing lots, or calling 
 dice, than by the fuffrages of a multitude. 
 
 C H A P. VI. 
 
 Advantages that accrue to the People from appoint- 
 ing Reprefentatives* 
 
 HOW then mail the People remedy the dif- 
 advantages that neceflarily attend their 
 fituation ? How fhall they refill the phalanx of 
 thofe who have engroffed to themfelves all the 
 honours, dignities, and power in the State ? 
 
 It will be by employing tor their defence the 
 fame means by which their adverfaries carry on 
 their attacks : it will be by ufmg the fame 
 weapons as they do, the fame order, the fame, 
 kind of difcipline.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 257 
 
 They are a fmall number, and confequently 
 ealily united ; a fmall number muft therefore 
 be oppofed to them, that a like union may 
 alfo be obtained. It is becaufe they are a 
 fmall number, that they can deliberate on every 
 occurrence, and never come to any rcfolu- 
 tions but fuch as are maturely weighed 
 it is becaufe they are few, that they can have 
 forms which continually ferve them for ge- 
 neral ftandards to refort to, approved maxims 
 to which they invariably adhere, and plans 
 which they never lofe fight of: here there- 
 fore, I repeat it, oppofe to them a fmall num- 
 ber, and you will obtain the like advantages. 
 
 Befides, thofe who govern, as a farther con- 
 fequence of their being few, have a more 
 considerable mare, confequently feel a deeper 
 concern in the fuccefs, whatever it may be, 
 of their enterprizes. As they ufually profefs 
 a contempt for their adverfaries, and are at 
 all times acting an ofFenfive part againfl them, 
 they impofe on themfelves an obligation of 
 conquering. They, in fhort, who are all 
 alive from the moil powerful incentives, and 
 aim at gaining new advantages, have to do 
 with a multitude, who, wanting only to pre- 
 ferve what they already poffefs, are unavoid- 
 ably liable to long intervals of inactivity and 
 
 S '
 
 S5S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fupinenefs. But the People, by appointing Re- 
 prefentatives, immediately gain to their caufe 
 that advantageous activity w.hich they before 
 flood in need of, to put them on a par with 
 their adverfaries ; and thofe paffions become 
 excited in their defenders by which they them- 
 felves cannot pofiibly be actuated. 
 
 Exclnfively charged with the care of pub- 
 lic liberty, the Reprefentatives of the Peo- 
 ple will be animated by a fenfe of the great- 
 nefs of the concerns with which they are 
 intruded. Diftinguifhed from the bulk of the 
 Nation, and forming among themfelves a fe- 
 parate Afiembly, they will ailert the rights of 
 which they have been made the Guardians, 
 with all that warmth which the efprit de corps 
 is ufed to infpke (a). Placed on an elevated 
 theatre, they will endeavour to render them- 
 felves dill more confpicuous ; and the arts and 
 ambitious activity of thofe who govern, will 
 now be encountered by the vivacity and per- 
 feverance of opponents actuated by the love of 
 glory. 
 
 {a) If it had not been for an incentive of this kind, 
 the Englifh Commons would not have vindicated their 
 right of taxation with fo much vigilance as they have 
 done, againfl all enterprizes, often perhaps* involuntary, 
 of the Lords.
 
 O F E N G L A N D, zfr 
 
 Laftly, as the Reprefentativcs of the People 
 will naturally be feledted from among thofe' 
 Citizens who are molt favoured by fortune, 
 and will have confequently much to preferve, 
 they will, even in the midit of quiet times, 
 keep a watchful eye on the motions of Power. 
 As the advantages they poffefs, will naturally 
 create a kind of rivalihip between them and 
 thofe who govern, the jcaloufy which they 
 will conceive againft the latter, will give them 
 an exquifite degree of fenfibility on every 
 increafe of their authority. Like thofe de-. 
 licate inftruments which difcover the ope- 
 rations of Nature, while they are yet imper- 
 ceptible to our fenfes, they will warn the 
 People of thofe things which of themfelves 
 they never fee but when it is too late ; and 
 their greater proportional mare, whether of 
 real riches, or of thofe which lie in the opi* 
 nions of Men, will make them, if I may fo 
 exprefs myfelf, the barometers that will dif- 
 cover, in its firft beginning, every tendency to 
 a change in the Conftitution (a). 
 
 {a) All the above reafoning eiTentially requires that 
 the Reprefentatives of the People {hould be united in 
 intereft with the People. We lhall Coon fee that thi* 
 union really obtains in the Englilh Conftitution, and ma/ 
 be called the mafter-piece of it. 
 
 S 2
 
 2o*o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 CHAP. VII. 
 
 The Suhjeft continued The Advantages thai ac- 
 crue to the People from their appointing Repre- 
 fentatives, are very inconjiderable, unlefs they 
 aljo entirely trujl their Legiflathe Authority io 
 
 them. 
 
 npHE obfervations made in the preced- 
 
 "** ing Chapter are fo obvious, that the 
 People themfelves, in popular Governments, 
 have alway been fenfible of the truth of them, 
 and never thought it pofiible to remedy, by 
 themfelves alone, the difadvantages necefiarily 
 attending their fituation. Whenever the op- 
 preffions of their Rulers have forced them to 
 rcfort to fome uncommon exertion ox their le- 
 gal powers, they have immediately put them- 
 felves under the direction of thofe few Men 
 who had been inftrumental in informing and 
 encou rap-in;? them : and when the nature of 
 the circumftances has required any degree of 
 f.rmnefs and perfeverance in their conduct, 
 they have never been able to attain the ends 
 they propofed to themfelves, except by means 
 of the moft implicit deference to thofe Leaders 
 whom they had thus appointed,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 261 
 
 But as thefe Leaders, thus haflily chofen, 
 are eafily intimidated by the continual dif- 
 play which is made before them of the terrors 
 of Power, as that unlimited confidence which 
 the People now repofe in them, only takes 
 place when public liberty is in the utmoft 
 danger, and cannot be kept up otherwife 
 than by an extraordinary conjunction of cir- 
 cumftances, and in which thofe who govern 
 feldom fuffer themfelves to be caught more 
 than once, the People have conftantly fought 
 to avail themfelves of the fhort intervals of 
 fuperiority which the chance of events had gi- 
 ven them, for rendering durable thofe advan 
 tages which they knew would, of themfelves, 
 be but tranfitory, and for getting fome perfons 
 appointed, whofe peculiar office it may be 
 to protect them, and whom the Conftitution 
 fhall thenceforwards recognize. Thus it was 
 that the People of Lacedasmon obtained their 
 Ephori, and the People of Rome their Tri- 
 bunes. 
 
 We grant this, will it be faid ; but the 
 Roman People never allowed their Tribunes 
 to conclude any thing definitively ; they, on the 
 contrary, referved to themfelves the right of 
 ratifying (a) any refolutions the latter mould 
 take, This, I anfwer, was the very circuiru 
 
 ($\ See Rouffeau's Social Contract, 
 
 S '
 
 262 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fiance that rendered the inftitution of Tri- 
 bunes totally ineffectual in the event. The 
 People thus -wanting to interfere with their own 
 opinions, in the refolutions of thofe on whom 
 they had, in their wifdom, determined entirely 
 to rely, and endeavouring to fettle with an 
 hundred thoufand votes, things which would 
 have been fettled equally well by the votes of 
 their advifers, defeated in the iffue every be- 
 neficial end of their former provifions ; and 
 while they meant to preferve an appearance of 
 their fovereignty (a chimerical appearance, 
 iince it was under the direction of others that 
 they intended to vote), they fell back into all 
 thofe inconveniences which we have before 
 mentioned. 
 
 The Senators, the Confuls, the Dictators, 
 and the other great Men in the Republic, 
 whom the People were prudent enough to 
 fear, and fimple enough to believe, continued 
 full to mix with them, and play off their 
 political artifices. They continued to make 
 ipeeches to them (a), and flill availed them- 
 
 {a) Valerius Maximus relates that the Tribunes of the 
 People having offered to propofe fome regulations in re- 
 gard to the price o( corn, in a time of great icarcity, 
 oc!pio Nafica over-ruled the Afiembly merely by faying, 
 V Sderce, Romans ; I know better than you what h 
 " expedient for the Republic. Which words were no 
 11 footer heard by the People, than they fhewed by 3
 
 OF ENGLAND. 2S3 
 
 felves of their privilege of changing at their 
 pleafure the place and form of the public meet- 
 ings. When they did not find it poflible by 
 fuch means to direct the refolutions of the Af- 
 femblies, they pretended that the omens were 
 not favourable, and under this pretext, or others 
 of the fame kind, they diflblved them (a). And 
 the Tribunes, when they had fucceeded fo far 
 as to effect an union among themfelves, thus 
 were obliged to fubmit to the pungent mortifi- 
 cation of feeing thofe projects which they had 
 purfued with infinite labour, and even through 
 the greateft dangers, irrecoverably defeated by 
 the moft defpicable artifices. 
 
 When, at other times, they faw that a con- 
 federacy was carrying on with uncommon 
 warmth againft them, and defpaired of fuc- 
 
 " filence full of veneration, that they were more affefted 
 " by his authority, than by the neceffity of providing 
 " for their own fubfiftence." Tacete, qrt.sfo, Quirites, 
 Plus enim ego quant <vos quid reipublicte expediat intelligo. 
 Qua voce audita, omnes, pleno <venerationis filentio, major em 
 ejus autoritatis quam al'tmentorum fuorum curam egerunt. 
 
 (a) Quid enim majus ejt, Ji de jure Augurun: quarimus, 
 fays Tully, who himfelf was an Augur, and a Senator into 
 the bargain, quam poffe afumviis imperils & fummis potejlaii- 
 bus Comitatus iff Concilia, vel injlituta dimittcre, <vel babtta 
 rtfeindere ! Quid gravius, quam rem Jufceptam d'irimi, fi 
 unus Augur alium (id eft, alium diem) di.xerit ! Se<$ 
 }e Legib. lib. ii. \z. 
 
 t
 
 264 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ceeding by employing expedients of the above 
 kind, or were afraid of diminishing their effica- 
 cy by a too frequent ufe of them, they betook 
 themfelves to other ftratagems. They then 
 conferred on the Confute, by the means of a 
 ihort form of words for the occafion (a), an ab- 
 folute power over the lives of the Citizens, or 
 even appointed a Diclator. The People, at 
 the fight of the State mafquerade which was 
 difplayed before them, were fure to fink into a 
 ftate of confirmation ; and the Tribunes, how- 
 ever clearly they might fee through the artifice, 
 alfo trembled in their turn, when they thus 
 beheld themfelves left without defenders (<?). 
 
 Atj^other times, they brought falfe accu- 
 fations againft the Tribunes before the Ailem- 
 bly itfelf; or by privately ilandering them 
 with the PeSj}le, they totally deprived them of 
 their confidence. It was through artifices of 
 this kind, that the People were brought to be- 
 hold, without concern, the murder of Tiberius 
 
 (c) ViJcat Cenful m quid detrimenti Refpublica capiat. 
 
 {b) " The Tribunes of the People," fays Livy, who 
 was a great admirer of the Ariftocratical power, " and 
 < the People themfelves, durft neither lift up their eyes, 
 *' r.cr even mutter, in the prefence of the Di&ator." 
 Nee ail<verfns Jjitiatoriam <vim, aut 1 rlbuni plebis aut ipfa 
 
 Picks, attolicre cculos, aut hifctre-. amkbant See Tit. 
 
 JJv, lib, vi. $ 6,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 265 
 
 Gracchus, the only Roman that was really- 
 virtuous, the only one who truly loved the 
 People. It was alfo in the fame manner that 
 Caius, who was not deterred by his brother's 
 fate from purfuing the fame plan of conduct, 
 was in the end fo entirely forfaken by the Peo- 
 ple, that nobody could be found among them 
 who would even lend him a horfe to fly from 
 the fury of the Nobles ; and he was at laft 
 compelled to lay violent hands upon himfelf, 
 while he invoked the wrath of the Gods on his 
 inconftant fellow-citizens. 
 
 At other times, they raifed divifions a- 
 mong the People. Formidable combinations 
 broke out, on a fudden, on the eve of im- 
 portant tranfadfcions ; and all moderate Men 
 avoided attending AfTemblies, where they faw 
 that all was to be tumult and confufion. 
 
 In fine, that nothing might be wanting to 
 the infolence with which they treated the Af- 
 femblies of the People, they fometimes falsi- 
 fied the declarations of the number of the votes; 
 they even once went fo far as to carry off the 
 urns into which the Citizens were to throw 
 their fuffrages (a), 
 
 (a) The reader with refpeft to all the above obferva- 
 tions, may fee Plutarch's Lives, particularly the Lives 
 Of the two Gracchi, I mull add, that I have avoided
 
 t6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 CHAP. VIII. 
 
 The Subject concluded. Effecls that have refulted, 
 in the JLnglijh Government , from the People's 
 Power being completely delegated to their Repre- 
 
 fentaiives. 
 
 BUT when the People have entirely trulled 
 their power to a mouerate number of 
 perfons, affairs immediate. 7 take a widely dif- 
 ferent turn. Thofe who govern are from that 
 moment obliged to lea off all thofe ftrata- 
 gems which had hitherto enfured their iuccefs. 
 Inftead of thofe Aifemblies which they affected 
 to defpife, and were perpetually comparing to 
 ftorms, or to the current of the Euripus (a), 
 
 drawing any inftance from thofe Aflemblics in which one 
 half of the People were made to arm themfelves againft 
 the other. I have here only alluded to thofe times 
 which immediately either preceded or followed the third 
 Punic war, that is, of thofe which are commonly called 
 the bejl period of the Republic. 
 
 (a) Tully makes no end of his fimiles on this fubjedt. 
 Quod enim /return, quern Euripum, tot mot us, t ant as & 
 tarn cartas habere putatis agitaticnes f.uclum, quantas pertur- 
 bationcs & quantos cejius habet ratio Comitiorum ? See Orat. 
 pro Murasna. Concio, fays he in another place, qu& ex 
 imperil ijfimis conjlat, is'c. De Amicitia, 25.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 267 
 
 and in regard to which they accordingly thought 
 thcmfelves at liberty to pafs over the rules of 
 Juftice, they now find that they have to deal 
 with Men who are their equals in point of edu- 
 cation and knowledge, and their inferiors only 
 in point of rank and form. They, in confe- 
 quence, foon find it neceffary to adopt quite 
 different methods ; and, above all, become very 
 careful not to talk to them any more about 
 the facrcd chickens, the white or black days, 
 and the Sibylline books. As they fee their 
 new adverfaries expect to have a proper regard 
 paid to them, that fingle circumftance infpires 
 them with it: as they fee them act in a regu- 
 lar manner, obferve conftant rules, in a word 
 proceed with form, they come to look upon 
 them with refpect, from the very fame realbn 
 which makes them themfelves to be reverenced 
 by the People. 
 
 The Reprefentatives of the People, on the 
 other hand, do not fail foon to procure for 
 themfelves every advantage that may enable 
 them effectually to ufe the powers with which 
 they have been entrufted 3 and to adopt every 
 rule of proceeding that may make their refo- 
 lutions to be truly the refult of reflection and 
 deliberation. Thus it was that the Reprefen- 
 tatives of the Englifh Nation, foon after their
 
 z53 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 firfl eftabliihment, became formed into a fepa- 
 rate AiTembly : they afterwards obtained the 
 liberty of appointing a Prefident : foon after, 
 they infilled upon their being confulted on the 
 laft form of the Acts to which they had given 
 rife : laflly, they infilled on thenceforth fram- 
 ing them themfelves. 
 
 In order to prevent any pombility of furprize 
 in the courfe of their proceedings, it is a fettled 
 rule with them, that every proportion, or bill, 
 muft be read three times, at different prefixed 
 days, before it can receive a final function : 
 and before each reading of the bill, as well as 
 at its firft introduction, an exprefs refolution 
 muft be taken to continue it under confider- 
 ation. If the bill be rejected, in any one of 
 thofe feveral operations, it muft be dropped, 
 and cannot be propofed again during the fame 
 Seffion (#). 
 
 [a) It is moreover a fettled rule in the Houfe of Com- 
 mons, that no Member is to fpeak more than oncejn-the 
 -fame- day. When the number and nature of the claufes 
 of a Bill require that it fhould be difcufTed in a freer man- 
 ner, a Committee is appointed for the purpofe, who 
 are to make their report afterwards to the Houfe. When 
 the fubjeft i^ of importance, this Committee is formed of 
 the whole Koufe, which Hill continues to fit in the fame 
 place, but in a lefs folemn manner, and under another 
 Prefident, who is called the Chairman of the Committee, 
 Jr. order to form the Hcufe again, the mace is re-
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 269 
 
 The Commons have been, above all, jealous 
 of the freedom of fpeech in their arTembly. 
 They have exprefly flipulated, as we have 
 above mentioned, that none of their words or 
 fpeeches fhould be queftioned in any place out 
 of their Houfe. In fine, in order to keep their 
 deliberations free from every kind of influence, 
 they have denied their Prefident the right to give 
 his vote, or even his opinion : they moreover 
 have fettled it as a rule, not only that the King 
 could not fend to them any exprefs propofal 
 about laws, or other fubjects, but even that 
 his name mould never be mentioned in the de- 
 liberations (#). 
 
 But that circumilance which, of all others, 
 conftitutes the fuperior excellence of a Go- 
 vernment in which the People act only through 
 their Reprefentatives, that is, by means of an 
 affembly formed of a moderate number of 
 perfons, and in which it is poffible for every 
 Member to propofe new fubjects, and to argue 
 and to canvafs the queflions that arife, is that 
 
 placed on the Table, and the Speaker goes again into 
 his chair, 
 
 (a) If any perfon were to mention in his fpeech, what 
 the King wifees Jhould be, would be glad to fee, &c. he 
 would be immediately called to order, for attempting to 
 influence the debate.
 
 2.70 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fuch a Conftitution is the only one that is Ca- 
 pable of the immenfe advantage, and of which 
 I do not know if I have been able to convey an 
 adequate idea to the reader when I mentioned it 
 before (a), I mean that of putting into the hands 
 of the People the moving fprings of the Legif- 
 lative authority* 
 
 In a Conftitution where the People at large 
 exercife the function of enacting the Laws, 
 as it is only to thofe perfons towards whom the 
 Citizens are accuftomed to turn their eyes, 
 that is to the very Men who govern, that 
 the Affembly have either time or inclination 
 to liften, they acquire, at lengthy as has con- 
 tlantly been the cafe in all Republics, the ex- 
 clufive right of propofmg, if they pleafe, 
 when they pleafe, in what manner they pleafe. 
 A prerogative this, of fuch extent, that it 
 would fuffice to put an affembly formed of 
 Men of the greateft parts, at the mercy of a 
 few dunces, and renders completely illufory the 
 boafted power of the People. Nay more, as 
 this prerogative is thus placed in the very 
 hands of the adverfaries of the People, it 
 forces the People to remain expofed to their 
 attacks, in a condition perpetually pafiive* 
 
 (/*) Sec chap. iv. of this Book.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 271 
 
 and takes from them the only legal means by 
 which they might effectually oppoie their usur- 
 pations. 
 
 To exprefs the whole in a few words. A 
 reprefentative Constitution places the remedy in 
 the hands of thofe who feel the diforder : but 
 a popular Conftitution places the remedy in the 
 hands of thofe who caufe it ; and it is neceffarily 
 productive, in the event, of the misfortune * 
 of the political calamity, of trufting the care 
 and the means of reprefling the invafions of 
 power, to the Men who have the enjoyment of 
 power. 
 
 CHAP. IX. 
 
 A farther' Difadvantage of Republican Govern* 
 merits. The People are neeeffaruy bet raxed by 
 thofe in whom they trvfl. 
 
 HOWEVER, thofe general affemblies of 
 a People who were made to determine 
 upon things which they neither underftood nor 
 examined, that general confufion in which 
 the Ambitious could at all times hide their 
 artifices, and carry on their fchemes with fafety, 
 were not he only evils attending the ancient 
 Commonwealths, There was a more fecret
 
 s 7 2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 defect, and a defect that ftruck immediately at 
 the very vitals of it, inherent in that kind of 
 Government. 
 
 It was impoffible for the People ever to have 
 faithful defenders. Neither thofe whom they 
 had exprefly chofen, nor thofe whom fome per- 
 fonal advantages enabled to govern the AfTem- 
 blies (for the only ufe, I mult repeat it, which 
 the People ever make of their power, is either 
 to give it way, or allow it to be taken from 
 them) could pofiibly be united to them by any 
 common feeling of the fame concerns. As their 
 influence put them, in a great meafure, upon 
 a level with thofe who were inverted with the 
 executive authority, they cared little to reftram 
 oppreffions out of the reach of which they faw 
 themfelves placed. Nay, they feared they 
 ihould thereby leffen a power which they knew 
 was one day to be their own ; if they had not 
 even already an actual fhare in it (a). 
 
 Thus, at Rome, the only end which the 
 Tribunes ever purfued with any degree of fin- 
 
 (c) How could it be expefled that Men who en- 
 tertained views of being Praetors, would endeavour to 
 reitrain the power of the Praetors, that Men who 
 aimed at being one day Confuls, would wiih to limit the 
 power of the Confuls, that Men whom their influence 
 among the People made fure of getting into the Senate, 
 would ferioufly endeavour to confine the authority of the 
 Senate ?
 
 OF ENGLAND. 273 
 
 cerity and perfeverance, was to procure to the 
 People, that is to themfelves, an ad million to 
 all the different dignities in the Republic. After 
 having obtained that a law fhoukl be enacted or 
 admitting Plebeians to the Confullhip, they pro- 
 cured for them the liberty of intermarrying with 
 the Patricians. They afterwards rendered them 
 admiflible to the Dictator ihip, to the office of 
 military Tribune, to the Lenforfhip : in a word, 
 the only ufe they made of the power of the Peo- 
 ple, was to increafe privileges which they called 
 the privileges of all, though they and their 
 friends alone were ever likely to have the enjoy- 
 ment of them. 
 
 But we do not find that they ever employed, 
 the power of the People in things really bene- 
 ficial to the People. We do not find that they 
 ever fet bounds to the terrible power of its Ma- 
 giftrates, that they ever reprelTed that clafs of 
 Citizens who knew how to mike their crimes 
 pafs uncenfured; in a word, that they ever en- 
 deavoured, on the one hand to regul te, and on 
 the other to ftrengthen, the judicial power; 
 precautions thefe, without which men might 
 ftruggle to the end of time, and never attain 
 true liberty (a\. 
 
 {a) Without fuch precautions, laws mud always be as 
 Pope expreffes it, 
 
 *' Still for the ftrong too weak, the weak too ftrong. , ' , 
 
 T
 
 274 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 And indeed the judicial power, that fure crite- 
 rion of the goodnefs of a Government, was al- 
 ways, at Rome, a mere inftxument of tyranny. 
 The Confuls were at ail times inverted with an 
 abfolute power over the lives of the Citizens. 
 The Dictators pofTefTed the fame right ; fo did 
 the Praetors, the Tribunes of the People, the 
 judicial CommilTioners named by the Senate, 
 and fo, of courfe, did the Senate itfelf ; and the 
 fact of the three hundred and feventy deferters- 
 whom it commanded to be thrown down at one 
 time, as Livy relates, from the Tarpeian rock, 
 fufficicntly fhews that it well knew how to exerr 
 its power upon occafion. 
 
 It even may be fa id, that, at Rome, the 
 power of life and death, or rather the right of 
 killing, was annexed to every kind of autho- 
 rity whatever, even to that which refults- from 
 mere influence, or wealth ; and the only confe- 
 rence of the murder of the Gracchi, which 
 was accompanied by the daughter of three 
 hundred, and afterwards of four thoufam] un- 
 armed Citizens, whom the Isobles knocked on 
 the heady was to engage the Senate to erect a 
 Temple to C^.lJ/J. The Lex Porcm de tergo "- 
 vium, which has been fo much celebrated, was 
 attended with no other effect but that of more 
 completely fecuring againft the danger of a re- 
 taliation, fuch. Confuls, Prrctors, Quceflors, &c,
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 275 
 
 as, like Verres, caufed the inferior Citizens of 
 Rome to be fcourged with rods, and put to 
 death upon croiTes, through mere caprice and 
 cruelty (#). 
 
 In fine, nothing can more completely mew to 
 what degree the Tribunes had forfaken the inte- 
 refts of the People, whom they were appointed 
 to defend, than the fact of their having allowed 
 the Senate to invefl itfelf with the power of tax- 
 ation : they even fuffered it to affume to itfelf 
 the power, not only of difpenfing with the laws, 
 but alio of abrogating them (). 
 
 () If we turn our eyes to Lacedxmon, we fiiall fee, 
 from feveral inftances of the juftice of the Ephori, that 
 matters were little better ordered there, in regard to the 
 administration of public juftice. And in Athens itfelf, 
 which is the only one of the ancient Commonwealths 
 in which the people feem to have enjoyed any degree of 
 real liberty, we fee the Magistrates proceed nearly in 
 the fame manner as they now do among the Turks : 
 and I think no other proof needs to be given than the 
 flory of that Barber in the Piraeus, who having fpread 
 about the Town the news of the orerthrow of the Athe- 
 nians in Sicily, which he had heard from a ftranger who 
 had flopped at his fhop, was put to the torture, by the 
 command of the Archons, becaufe he could not tell the 
 name of his author. See Piut. Life o/Niciat. 
 
 (b) There are frequent inftances of the Confuls tak- 
 ing away from the Capitol the tables of the laws pafTed 
 under their piedecefTors. Nor was this, as we might 
 at firft be tempted to beliere, an a& of violence which 
 
 T 2
 
 276 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In a word, as the necefTary confequence of 
 the communlcability of power, a circumftance ef- 
 fentially inherent in the republican form of go- 
 vernment, it is impoffible for it ever to be re- 
 trained within certain rules. Thofe who are 
 in a condition to controul it, from that very 
 circumftance, become its defenders. Though 
 they may have rifen, as we may fuppofe, from 
 the humbleft ftations, and fuch as feemed to- 
 tally to preclude them from all ambitious 
 Views, they have no fooner reached a certain 
 degree of eminence, than they begin to aim 
 higher. Their endeavours had at firft no other 
 object, as they profeffed, and perhaps with fin- 
 eerity, than to fee the laws impartially exe- 
 cuted : their only view now is to fet them- 
 felves above them ; and feeing themfelves 
 raifed to the level of a clafs of Men who pof- 
 
 fuccefs alone could juftify; it was a confequence of the 
 acknowledged power enjoyed by the Senate cujus trat 
 grcwijjimum judicium di jure legum, as we may fee in feve- 
 ral places in Tully. Nay, the Augurs themfelves, at 
 Tully informs us, enjoyed the fame privilege. " If laws 
 '< have not been laid before the people, in the legal 
 form, they (the Augurs) may fet them afide : as was 
 " done with refpect to the Lex Tatia, by the decree of 
 -' the College, and to the Leges Livi<r, by the advice of 
 Philip, who was Conful and Augur." Legem fi ms 
 jure rogata eft, tollere pojfuvt ; ut Tatiam, decreto Collegii, 
 ut Li-vius, covfilio Pkilippi, Coufulis cjf Auguris See LUt 
 Li'lb. lib. ii. k 12.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 277 
 
 fefs all the power, and enjoy all the advantages, 
 in the State, they make haile to affociate them- 
 felves with them (#). 
 
 Perfonal pover and independence on the 
 laws being, in fuch States, the immediate con- 
 fequence of the favour of the People, they are 
 under an unavoidable necefiity of being be- 
 trayed. Corrupting, as it were, every thing 
 they touch, they cannot {hew a preference to 
 a Man, but they thereby attack his virtue ; 
 they cannot raife him, without immediately 
 Jofing him and weakening their own caufe ; 
 
 (a) Which always proves an eafy thing. It is in Com- 
 monwealths the particular care of that clafs of Men who 
 are at the head of the State, to keep a watchful eye over 
 the People, in order to craw over to their own parcy any 
 Man who happens to acquire a confi.'.erable influence 
 among them ; and this they are (and indeed muft be) 
 the more attentive to do, in proportion as the nature of 
 the Government is more democratical. 
 
 The Conituution of Rome had even made exprefs pro * 
 vifiono on that fubjecr. Not only the Cenfors could at 
 once remove any Citizen into what Tribe they pleafed, 
 and even into the Senate, and we may eafily believe that 
 they maae a political ufe of this privilege ; but it was 
 moreover a fettled rule, that all Perfons who had been 
 promoted to any public office by the People, fuch as the 
 Confuifhip, the Edilefhip, or Tribunefhip, became ipfo 
 faflo y members of the Senate. See Middleton's Dijfer- 
 taticm on the Roman Senate, 
 
 T 3
 
 278 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 nay, they infpire him with views diredtly oppo- 
 fite to their own, and fend him to join and in 
 creafe the number of their enemies. 
 
 Thus, at Rome, after the feeble barrier 
 which excluded the People from offices of power 
 and dignity had been thrown down, the great 
 Plebeians, whom the votes of the People began 
 to raife to thofe offices, were immediately received 
 into the Senate, as has been juft now obferved. 
 From that period, their families began to form, 
 in conjunction with the ancient Patrician fami 
 lies, a new combination or political affociation 
 of perfo.ns (a) ; and as this combination was 
 formed of no particular clafs of Citizens, but of 
 all thofe in general who had influence enough 
 to gain admittance into it, a fingle overgrown 
 head was now to be feen in the Republic, which 
 confiftins: of all thofe who had either wealth or 
 power of any kind, and difpofing at will of the 
 laws and the power of the People (b~), foon loft 
 all regard to moderation and decency. 
 
 {a) Called Nobiles and Nobijitas.. 
 
 {k) Itwac, ; n feveral refpecls, a misfortune for the Peo- 
 ple of Rome, whatever may have been faid to the con- 
 trary by the Writers on this fubjeft, that the diftinction 
 between the Patricians and the Plebeians was ever abolifh- 
 ed ; though, to lay the truth, this was an event which 
 cculd not be prevented.
 
 OF ENGLAND, 279 
 
 Every Conftitution, therefore, whatever may 
 be its form, which does not provide for incon- 
 veniencies of the kind here mentioned, is a 
 Conftitution eflentially imperfect. It is in Man 
 himfelf that the fcurce of the evils to be re- 
 medied, lies ; general precautions therefore csun. 
 alone prevent them. If it be a fatal error en- 
 tirely to rely on the juftice and equity of thofe 
 who govern, it is an error no lcfs dangerous to 
 imagine, that, while virtue and moderation are 
 the conftant companions of thofe who oppofe 
 the abnfes of Power, all ambition, all thirft after 
 dominion, have retired to the other party, 
 
 ThGUgh wife Men fometimes may, led aiiray 
 by the power of names, and the heat of po- 
 litical contentions, lofe fight of what ought 
 to be their real aim, they neverthelefs know 
 that it is not againft the Appii 9 the Coruncanii, 
 the Cethegi, but againft. all thofe who can in- 
 fluence the execution of the laws, that pre- 
 cautions ought to be taken, that it is not 
 the Conful, the Prastor, the Archon, the Mi- 
 nifler, the King, whom we ought to dread, 
 nor the Tribune, or the Reprefentative of the 
 People, on whom we ought implicitly to rely; 
 but that all thofe perfons, without diftin&ion, 
 ought to be the objects of our jealoufy, who, 
 
 T4
 
 280 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 by any methods, and under any names whatfo- 
 ever, have acquired the means of turning againft 
 each individual the collective ftrensth of all. 
 and have fo ordered things around themfelves, 
 that whoever attempts to refill them, is fure to 
 find himielf engaged alone againft a thoufand. 
 
 CHAP. X. 
 
 Fundamental difference between the Englijh Govern- 
 ment, and the Governments jufi defer ibed. In 
 
 England all Executive Authority is plat ed out of 
 the hand* of thofe in whom the People trvfl. life- 
 fulnefs of the Power of the Crown. 
 
 N what manner then, has the Englifh Con- 
 flitution contrived to find a remedy for evils 
 which, from the very nature of Men and things, 
 feem to be irremediable ? How has it found 
 means to oblige thofe perfons to whom the Peo- 
 ple have given up their power, to make them 
 effectual and lafting "returns of gratitude ? thofe 
 who enjoy an exclufive authority, to feek the 
 advantage of all ? thofe who make the laws, 
 
 to make only equitable ones ? It has been by 
 
 fubjecling themfelves to thofe laws, and for that 
 purpofe excluding them from all fliare in the 
 execution of them,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 281 
 
 Thus, the Parliament can eftablifh as nume- 
 rous a Handing army as it pleafes; but imme- 
 diately another Power comes forward, which 
 takes the abfolute command of it, which fills 
 all the polls in it, and directs its motions at its 
 pleafure. The Parliament may lay new taxes ; 
 but immediately another Power feizes upon 
 the produce of them, and alone enjoys the ad- 
 vantages and glory arifmg from the difpofal of 
 it. The Parliament may even, if you pleafe, 
 repeal the laws on which the fafety of the 
 Subject is grounded ; but it is not their own 
 caprices and arbitrary humours, it is the ca- 
 price and paffions of other Men, which they 
 will have gratified, when they mall thus have 
 overthrown the columns of public liberty. 
 
 And the Englifh Conflitution has not only 
 excluded from any fhare in the Execution of 
 the laws, thole in whom the People trull for 
 the enacting of them, but it has alfo taken 
 from them what would have had the fame per- 
 nicious influence on their deliberations the 
 hope of ever invading that executive authority, 
 and transferring it to themfelves. 
 
 This authority has been made in England 
 one fingle, indivisible prerogative ; it has been 
 made for ever the unalienable attribute of one
 
 *Sa THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 one perfon, marked out and afcertained before- 
 hand by folemn laws and long eftablifhed cuf- 
 torn ; and all the active forces in the State 
 have been left at his difpofal. 
 
 In order to fecure this prerogative (till far- 
 ther againft all poffibility of invafions from in- 
 dividuals, it has been heightened and ftrength- 
 ened by every thing that can attract and fix 
 the attention and reverence of the people. The 
 power of conferring, and withdrawing, places 
 and employments has alio been added to it, ami 
 ambition itfelf has thus been interefted in its 
 defence, and fervice. 
 
 A fhare in the Lcgiflative power has alfo 
 been given to the Man to whom this preroga- 
 tive has been delegated : a paflive fhare in- 
 deed, and the only one that can, with fafety 
 to the State, be trufied to him, but by means 
 of which he is enabled to defeat every attempt 
 againft his conftitutional authority. 
 
 Laftly, he is the only felf-exifting and per- 
 manent Power in the State. The Generals, 
 the Minifters of State, are fo only by the con- 
 tinuance of his pleafure. He would even dif- 
 mifs the Parliament themfelves, if ever he 
 faw them begin to entertain dangerous defigns; 
 and he needs only fay one word to difperfe
 
 OF ENGLAND. 283 
 
 every power in the State that may threaten 
 his authority. Formidable prerogatives thefe ; 
 but with regard to which we mail be inclined 
 to lay afide our apprehenfions, if we reflect, 
 on the one hand, on the great privileges of 
 the People by which they have been counter- 
 balanced, and on the other, on the happy con- 
 fequences that refult from their being thus 
 united together. 
 
 From this unity, and, if I may fo exprefs 
 myfelf, this total fequeftration of the Execu- 
 tive authority, this advantageous confequence 
 in the firft place follows, which has been men- 
 tioned in a preceding Chapter, that the atten- 
 tion of the whole Nation is directed to one 
 and the fame object. The People, befides, 
 enjoy this moll elfential advantage, which they 
 would vainly endeavour to obtain under the 
 government of many, they can give their 
 confidence, without giving power over them- 
 felves, and againft themlelves , they can ap- 
 point Truflees, and yet not give themfelves 
 Mailers. 
 
 Thofe Men to whom the People have dele- 
 gated the power of framing the Laws, arc 
 thereby made fure to feel the whole preflure 
 of them. They can increafe the prerogatives 
 
 9
 
 284 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 of the executive authority, but they cannot in* 
 veil themfelves with it : they have it not in 
 their power to command its motions, they only 
 can unbind its' hands. 
 
 They are made to derive their importance, 
 nay, they are indebted for their exiflence, to 
 the need in which that Power Hands of their 
 affiftance ; and they know that they would 
 no fooner have abufed the truft of the People, 
 and completed the treacherous work, than they 
 would fee themfelves diffolved, fpurned, like 
 inftruments now fpent, and become ufelefs. 
 
 This fame difpofition of things alfo prevents 
 in England, that eifential defect, inherent in 
 the Government of many, which has been de- 
 fcribed in the preceding Chapter. 
 
 In that fort of Government, the caufe of 
 the People, as has been obferved, is conti- 
 nually deferted and betrayed. The arbitrary 
 prerogatives of the governing Powers are at 
 all times either openly or fecretly favoured, 
 not only by thofe in whofe poflcflion they are s 
 not only by thofe who have good reafon to 
 hope that they fhall at fome future time fhare 
 in the exercife of them, but alfo by the whole 
 croud of thofe Men who, in confequence of 
 the natural difpofition of Mankind to over-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 28$ 
 
 rate their own advantages, fondly imagine, ei- 
 ther that they fhall one day enjoy fome branch 
 of this governing authority, or that they are 
 even already, in fome way or other, affociated 
 to it. 
 
 But as this authority has been made, in 
 England, the indivifible, unalienable attribute 
 of one alone, all other perfons in the State are, 
 ipfo fafto, interefted to confine it within its due 
 bounds. Liberty is thus made the common 
 caufe of all ; the laws that fecure it are fup- 
 ported by Men of every rank and order ; and 
 the Habeas Corpus A6t, for inftance, is as 
 zealoufly defended by the firft Nobleman in 
 the Kingdom, as by the meanell: Subject. 
 
 Even the Minifter himfelf, in confequence 
 of this inalienability of the executive authority, 
 is equally interefted with his fellow-citizens 
 to maintain the laws on which public liberty 
 is founded. He knows, in the midft of his 
 fchemes for enjoying or retaining his authority, 
 that a Court-intrigue, or a caprice, may at 
 every inftant confound him with the multitude, 
 and the rancour of a fucceffor long kept out, 
 fend him to linger in the fame jail which his 
 temporary paftions might tempt him to prepare 
 for others.
 
 aS6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In confequence of this difpofition of things, 
 great Men, therefore, are made to join in a 
 common caufe with the People, for retraining 
 the excefles of the governing Power; and, 
 which is no lefs eiTential to the public wel- 
 fare, they are alfo, from this fame caufe, com- 
 pelled to reftrain the excefs of their own pri- 
 vate power and influence, and a general fpirit 
 of juilice becomes thus diffufed through all 
 part9 of the State. 
 
 The wealthy Commoner, the Reprefentative 
 of the People, the potent Peer, always having 
 before their eyes the view of a formidable 
 Power, of a Power from the attempts of 
 which they have only the fhield of the laws 
 to protect them, and which would, in the iflue, 
 retaliate an hundred fold upon them their acts 
 of violence, are compelled, both to wifh only 
 for equitable laws, and to obferve them with 
 fcrupulous exadtnefs. 
 
 Let then the People dread (it is necefTary 
 to the prefervation of their liberty), but let 
 thern never entirely ceafe to love, the Throne, 
 that folc and indivifiblc feat of all the active 
 powers in the State. 
 
 Let them know, it is that, which, by 
 lending an immenfe ftrength to the arm of 
 Juilice, has enabled her to bring to account as
 
 OF ENGLAND. 2S7 
 
 vvell the moft powerful, as the meaneft offen- 
 der, which has fuppreffed, and if I may fo 
 rxprefs myfelf, weeded out all thofe tyrannies, 
 fometimes confederated with, and fometimes 
 adverfe to, each other, which incefTantly tend 
 to grow up in the middle of civil focieties, and 
 are the more terrible in proportion as they 
 feel themfelvcs to be lefs firmly eftablifhed. 
 
 Let them know, it is that, which, by 
 making all honours and places depend on the 
 will of one Man, has confined within private 
 walls thofe projects the purfuit of which, in 
 former times, fhook the foundations of whole 
 States, has changed into intrigues the con- 
 flicts, the outrages of ambition, and that 
 thofe contentions which, in the prefent times, 
 afford them only matter of amufement, are the. 
 Volcanos which fet in flames the ancient Com- 
 monwealths. 
 
 It is that, which, leaving to the rich no 
 other fecurity for his palace than that which 
 the peafant has for his cottage, has united his 
 caufe to that of this latter, the caufe of the 
 powerful to that of the helplefs, the caufe of 
 the Man of extenfive influence and connections, 
 to that of him who is without friends. 
 
 It is the Throne above all, it is this jealous 
 Power, which makes the People fure that its
 
 283 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Reprefentatives never will be any thing more 
 than its Reprefentatives : at the fame time it is 
 the evcr-fubfifting Carthage which vouches to> 
 it for the duration of their virtue. 
 
 C H A P. XL 
 
 Ike Towers which the People them/elves excrcife. 
 The Ekoiton of Members of Parliament. 
 
 T^HE Englifh Confcitution having effen- 
 tially connected the fate of the Men to 
 whom the People truu their power, with that 
 of the People themfelves, really feems, by 
 that caution alone, to have procured the latter 
 a complete lecurity. 
 
 However, as the viciffitude of human affairs 
 may, in procefs of time, realize events which 
 at fir ft had appeared moft improbable, it might 
 happen that the Miniiiers of the Executive 
 power, notwithftandir.g the intereft they them- 
 felves have in the preservation of public li- 
 berty, and in fpitc of the precautions cxprefly 
 taken in order to prevent the effedt of their 
 influence, fhould, at length, employ fuch effi- 
 cacious means of corruption as might bring 
 about a furrender of fome of the laws upon 
 
 7
 
 O F E N G L A N D- 2S9 
 
 which this public liberty is founded. And 
 though we fhould fuppofe that fuch a danger 
 would really be chimerical, it might at leaft 
 happen, that, conniving at a vicious admini- 
 (tration, and being over liberal of the produce 
 of the labours of the People, the Reprefen- 
 tatives of the People might make them fuffer 
 many of the evils which attend worfe forms of 
 Government. 
 
 Laftly, as their duty does not confift only , 
 in preferving their conflituehts againft the cala- 
 mities of an arbitrary Government, but more- 
 over in procuring them the belt adminiftration 
 poffible, it might happen that they would 
 manifeft, in this refpedt, an indifference which 
 would, in its confequences, amount to a real 
 calamity. 
 
 It was therefore neceffary that the Consti- 
 tution fhould furnilh a remedy for all the 
 above cafes ; now, it is in the right of elect- 
 ing Members of Parliament, that this remedy 
 lies. 
 
 When the time is come at which the com- 
 miflion which the People had given to their 
 delegates expires, they again afiemble in their 
 feveral Towns or Counties : on thefe occafions 
 they have it in their power to elect again thofe 
 
 U
 
 * 9 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 of their Reprefentatives whofe former conduct 
 they approve, and to reject thofe who have con- 
 tributed to give rife to their complaints. A fim- 
 ple remedy this, and which only requiring, in 
 its application, a knowledge of matters of fact, 
 is entirely within the reach of the abilities of 
 the People ; but a remedy, at the fame time, 
 which is the moil effectual that could be appli- 
 ed ; for, as the evils complained of, arife merely 
 from the peculiar difpofitions of a certain num- 
 ber of individuals, to fet afide thofe individuals, 
 is to pluck up the evil by the roots. 
 
 But I perceive, that in order to make the 
 reader fenfible of the advantages that may ac- 
 crue to the People of England, from their right 
 of election, there is another of their rights, of 
 which it is abfolutely neceffary that I fhould 
 firft give an account,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 291 
 
 CHAP. XII. 
 
 'The Subjeft continued. Liberty of the Prefs. 
 
 AS the evils that may be complained of in 
 a State, do not always arife merely from 
 the defedl of the laws, but alfo from the non- 
 execution of them, and this non-execution of 
 fuch a kind, that it is often impoflible to fubject 
 it to any exprefs punifhment, or even to afcer- 
 tain it by any previous definition, Men, in feveral 
 States, have been led to feek for an expedient 
 that might fupply the unavoidable deficiency of 
 legiflative provifions, and begin to operate, as 
 it were, from the point at which the latter began 
 to fail : I mean here to fpeak of the Cenforial 
 power ; a power which may produce excellent 
 effects, but the excrcife of which (contrary to 
 that of the legiflative power) raufi be left to 
 the People themfelves. 
 
 As the propofed end of Legislation is not, 
 according to what has been above obferved, to 
 have the particular intentions of individuals, 
 upon every cafe, known and complied with, 
 but folely to have what is mofl conducive to 
 the public good on the occofions that ariie, 
 found out, and eftabliihed, it is not an eflentisl 
 
 U 2
 
 492 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 requisite in legiQative operations, that every in- 
 dividual fhould be called upon to deliver his 
 opinion ; and fince this expedient, which at 
 fir ft fight appears fo natural, of feeking out by 
 the advice of all that which concerns all, is 
 found liable, when carried into practice, to 
 the greateft inconveniences, we mult not hefi- 
 tate to lay it afide entirely. But as it is the 
 opinion of individuals alone, which confti- 
 tutes the check of a cenforial power, this power 
 cannot poffibly produce its intended effect 
 any farther than this public opinion is made 
 known and declared : the fentiments of the 
 People are the only thing in queftion here : 
 therefore it is necelTary that the People fhould 
 fpeak for themfelves, and manifeft thofe fen- 
 timents. A particular Court of Cenfure there- 
 fore effentially fruftrates its intended purpofe : 
 it is attended, befides, with very great incon- 
 veniences. 
 
 As the ufe of fuch a Court is to deter- 
 mine upon thofe cafes which lie out of the 
 reach of the laws, it cannot be tied down to 
 any precife regulations. As a farther confe- 
 quence of the arbitrary nature of its functions, 
 it cannot even be fubjectcd to any constitutional 
 check : and it continually prefents to the eye 
 the view of a power entirely arbitrary, and 
 which in its different exertions may affect,
 
 OFENGLAND. 293 
 
 in the moft cruel manner, the peace and hap- 
 pinefs of individuals. It is attended, befides, 
 with this yery pernicious confcquence, that, 
 by dictating to the people their judgments of 
 Men or meafures, it takes from them that 
 freedom outranking, which is the noblefl pri- 
 vilege, as well as the firmed fupport of Li- 
 berty (a). 
 
 We may therefore look upon it as a far- 
 ther proof of the fondnefs of the principles 
 
 [a) M. de Montefquieu, and M. RoufTeau, and in- 
 deed all the Writers on this fubjeft I have met with, 
 bellow vaR encomiums on the Cenforial Tribunal that 
 had been inftituted at Rome; they have not been 
 aware that this power of Cenfure, lodged in the hands 
 of peculiar Magi Urates, with other difcretionary powers 
 annexed to it, was no other than a piece of ftate-craft, 
 like thofe defcribed in the preceding Chapters, and had 
 been contrived by the Senate as an additional means of 
 fecuring its authority. Sir Thomas More has alfo adopted 
 fjmilar pinions on the fubjedt : and he is fo far from al- 
 lowing the people to canvafs the aftions of their Rulers, 
 that in his Syftem of Policy, which he calls, An Account 
 of Utopia (the happy Region, tv and totto^ he makes 
 it death for individuals to talk about the conduct of Go- 
 vernment. 
 
 I feel a kind of pleafure, I muft. confefs, to obferve on 
 this occafion, that though I have been called by fome an 
 advocate for Power, I have carried my ideas of Liberty 
 farther than many Writers who have mentioned that word 
 with much enthufiafm. 
 
 u <?
 
 194 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 on which the Englifh conftitution is founded, 
 that it has allotted to the People themfelves 
 the province of openly canvafllng and arraign- 
 ing the conduct of thofe who are inverted with 
 any branch of public authority ; and that it has 
 thus delivered into the hands of the People 
 at large, the exercife of the cenforial power. 
 Every fubject in England has not only a 
 right to prefent petitions to the King, or to the 
 Houfes of Parliament, but he has a right 
 alfo to lay his complaints and obfervations 
 before the Public, by means of an open 
 prefs. A formidable right this, to thofe who 
 rule mankind ; and which, continually dif- 
 pelling the cloud of majeity by which they 
 are furrounded, brings them to a level with the 
 reft of the people, and flrikes at the very be- 
 ing of their authority. 
 
 And indeed this privilege is that which has 
 been obtained by the Englifh Nation with the 
 greatefl difficulty, and latefl in point of time, 
 at the expence of the Executive power. Free- 
 dom was in every other refpect already efta- 
 blifhed, when the Englifh were ftill, with 
 regard to the public exprefllon of their kn- 
 timents, under reftraints that may be called 
 defpotic. Hiftory abounds with inftances of 
 the feverity of the Court of Star-Chamber,
 
 O F E N G L A N D, 295 
 
 againft thofe who prefumed to write on poli- 
 tical fubjects. It had fixed the number of 
 printers and printing-preiles, and appointed a 
 Lice.'ifer, without whofe approbation no book 
 could be published. Befides, as this Tribunal 
 decided matters by its own lingle authority, 
 without the intervention of a Jury, it was al- 
 ways ready to find thofe perfons guilty, whom 
 the Court was pleafed to look upon as fuch ; 
 nor was it indeed without ground that -Chief 
 Juflice Coke, whofe notions of liberty were 
 fomewhat tainted with the prejudices of the 
 times in which he lived, concluded the elo- 
 giums he has bellowed on this Conrt, with 
 faying, that, " the right inftitution and orders 
 " thereof being obferved, it doth keep all Eng- 
 " land in quiet." 
 
 After the Court of Star-Chamber had been 
 abolifhed, the Long Parliament, whofe con- 
 duct and affumed power were little better qua- 
 lified to bear a fcrutiny, revived the regulations 
 againft the freedom of the prefs. Charles the 
 Second, and after him James the Second, 
 procured farther renewals of them. Thefe 
 latter acts having expired in the year -1692, 
 were at this asra, although pofterior to the 
 Revolution, continued for two years longer : 
 
 U 4
 
 i 9 6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fo that it was not till the year 1694, that, 
 in confequence of the Parliament's refufal to 
 continue the prohibitions any longer, the free- 
 dom of the prefs (a privilege which the Exe- 
 cutive power could not, it feemed, prevail 
 upon itfelf to yield up to the people) was 
 finally eftablifhed. 
 
 In what does then this liberty of the prefs 
 precifely confift ? It is a liberty left to every 
 one to publifh any thing that comes into his 
 head ? To calumniate, to blacken, whomfo- 
 ever he pleafes ? No; the fame laws that pro- 
 tect the perfon and the property of the indivi- 
 dual, do alfo protect his reputation; and they 
 decree againft libels, when really fo, punifh- 
 ments of much the fame kind as are eftablilh- 
 ed in other Countries. But, on the other hand, 
 they do not allow, as in other States, that a 
 Man fhould be deemed guilty of a crime for 
 merely publifhing fomething in print ; and 
 they appoint a punifhment only againft him 
 who has printed things that are in their nature 
 criminal, and who is declared guilty of fo do- 
 ing by twelve of his equals, appointed to de- 
 termine upon his cafe, with the precautions we 
 have before defcribed. 
 
 The liberty of the prefs, as cftabliihed in 
 England, confifts therefore, to define it more
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 297 
 
 precifely, in this, That neither the Courts of 
 Juflice, nor any other Judges whatever, are au- 
 thorifed to take any notice of writings intended 
 for the prefs, but are confined to thofe which 
 are actually printed, and mufl, in thefe cafes, 
 proceed by the Trial by Jury. 
 
 It is even this latter circumflance which 
 more particularly conflitutes the freedom of 
 the prefs. If the Magiftrates, though con- 
 fined in their proceedings to cafes of criminal 
 publications, were to be the fole Judges of 
 the criminal nature of the things publifhed, 
 it might eafily happen that, with regard to a 
 point which, like this, fo highly excites the 
 jealoufy of the governing Powers, they would 
 exert themfelves with fo much fpirit and per- 
 feverance, that they might, at length, fuc- 
 ceed in completely finking off all the heads of 
 the hydra. 
 
 But whether the authority of the Judges be 
 exerted at the motion of a private individual, 
 or whether it be at the inftance of the Govern- 
 ment itfelf, their fole office is to declare the 
 punifhment eftablifhed by the law : it is to 
 the Jury alone that it belongs to determine 
 on the matter of law, as well as on the matter 
 of fact ; that is, to determine, not only whe- 
 ther the writing which is the fubject of the
 
 2 9 S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 charge has really been compofed by the Man 
 charged with having done it, and whether it 
 be really meant of the perfon named in the in- 
 dictment, but alfo, whether its contents are 
 criminal. 
 
 And though the law in England does not 
 allow a Man, profecuted for having publifhed 
 a libel, to offer to fupport by evidence the 
 truth of the fadts contained in it, (a mode of 
 proceeding which would be attended with very 
 mifchievous confequences, and is every where 
 prohibited), yet (a) as the indictment is to ex- 
 press that the facts are falfe, malicious, &c. 
 and the Jury, at the fame time, are fole mailers 
 of their verdict, that is, may ground it upon 
 what confederations they pleafe, it is very pro- 
 bable that they would acquit the accufed party, 
 if the fact, afferted in the writing before them, 
 were matter of undoubted truth, and of a ge- 
 neral evil tendency. They, at lead, would 
 certainly have it their power. 
 
 And this would ftill more likely be the cafe 
 if the conduct of the Government itfelf was 
 arraigned ; becaufe, befides this conviction 
 
 (a) In actions for damages between individuals, the 
 cafe, if I miftake not, is different, and the defendant is 
 allowed to produce evidence of the fails afferted by* 
 him. 5
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 -99 
 
 which we fuppofe in the Jury, of the cer- 
 tainty of the facts, they would alfo be in- 
 fluenced by their fenfe of a principle gene- 
 rally admitted in England, and which, in a 
 late celebrated caufe, has been ftrongly infifled 
 upon, viz. That, " though to fpeak ill of in- 
 " dividuals was deferving of reprehenficn, yet 
 " the public acts of Government ought to lie 
 " open to public examination, and that it was 
 " a fervice done to the State, to canvafs them 
 " freely (a)." 
 
 And indeed this extreme fecurity with which 
 every man in England is enabled to communi- 
 cate his fentiments to the Public, and the ge- 
 neral concern which matters relative to the 
 Government are always fure to create, has 
 wonderfully multiplied all kinds of public pa- 
 pers. Befides thole which, being publifhed at 
 the end of every year, month, or week, pre- 
 fent to the reader a recapitulation of every 
 thing interefting that may have been done or 
 faid during their refpective periods, there are 
 feveral others, which making their appearance 
 every day, or every other day, communicate 
 to the public the feveral meafures taken by 
 
 (a) See Serjeant Glynn's Speech for Woodfall in 
 the profecution again the latter, by the Attorney. 
 General, for publiihing Junius's letter to the King.
 
 3 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the Government, as well as the different caufes 
 of any importance, whether civil or criminal, 
 that occur in the Courts of Juftice, and 
 Iketches from the fpeeches either of the Ad- 
 vocates, or the Judges, concerned in the ma- 
 nagement and decifion of them. During the 
 time the Parliament continues fitting, the votes, 
 or refolutions of the Houfe of Commons, are 
 daily publiihed by authority ; and the moll 
 interefling fpeeches in both Houfes, are taken 
 down in fhort-hand, and communicated to the 
 Public, in print. 
 
 Laftly, the private anecdotes in the Metro- 
 polis, and the Country, concur alfo towards 
 filling the collection ; and as the feveral public 
 papers circulate, or are tranferibed into others, 
 in the different Country Towns, and even 
 find their way into the villages, where every 
 Man, down to the labourer, perufes them with 
 a fort of eagcrnefs, every individual thus be- 
 comes acquainted with the State of the Nation, 
 from one end to the other ; and by thefe means 
 the general intercourfe is fuch, that the three 
 Kingdoms feem as if they were one fingle Town, 
 
 And it is this public notoriety of all things, 
 that conftitutes the fupplcmental power, or 
 check, which, we have above faid, is fo ufe- 
 ful to remedy the unavoidable infufliciency
 
 OF ENGLAND. 301 
 
 of the laws, and keep within their refpective 
 bounds all thofe perfons who enjoy any mare 
 of public authority. 
 
 As they are thereby made fenfible that all 
 their actions are expofed to public view, they 
 dare not venture upon thofe acts of partiality, 
 thofe fecret connivances at the iniquities of 
 particular perfons, or thofe vexatious practices, 
 which the Man in office is but too apt to be 
 guilty of, when, exercifing his office at a 
 diftance from the public eye, and as it were 
 in a corner, he is fatisfied that provided he be 
 cautious, he may difpenfe with being juft. 
 Whatever may be the kind of abufe in which 
 perfons in power may, in fuch a date of things, 
 be tempted to indulge thcmfelves, they are 
 convinced that their irregularities will be im- 
 mediately divulged. The Juryman, for exam- 
 ple, knows that his verdict, the judge, that 
 his direction to the Jury, will prefently be laid 
 before the Public : and there is no Man in 
 office, but who thus finds himfelf compelled, 
 in almoft every inflance, to choofe between 
 his duty, and the furrencler of all his former 
 reputation. 
 
 It will, I am aware, be thought that I fpeak 
 in too high terms, of the effects produced 
 by the public news-papers. I indeed confefs
 
 3 o2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 that all the pieces contained in them are not 
 patterns of good reafoning, or of the trueft 
 Attic wit ; but, on the other hand, it fcarcely 
 ever happens that a fubjedt in which the laws, 
 or in general the public welfare, arc really con- 
 cerned, fails to call forth fome able writer, 
 who, under fome form or other, communicates 
 to the public his obfervations and complaints, 
 I mall add here, that, though an upright Man 
 labouring for a while under a ftrong 'popular 
 prejudice, may, fupported by the confcioufnefs 
 of his innocence, endure with patience the 
 fevereft imputations, the guilty Man, hearing 
 nothing in the reproaches of the public, but 
 what he knows to be true, and already upbraids 
 himielf with, is very far from enjoying any 
 fuch comfort ; and that, when a man's own 
 confeience takes part againft him, the moft 
 defpicable weapon is fufficient to wound him to 
 the quick (a). 
 
 (a) I /hall take this occafion to obferve, that the li- 
 berty of the preis is lb far from being injurious to the 
 reputation of individuals, (as fome perfons have com- 
 plained) that it is, on the contrary, its furelr. guard. 
 When there exiils no means of communication with the 
 Public, every one is expofed, without defence, to the 
 fecret fhafts of malignity and envy. The Man in of- 
 fice lofes his reputation, the Merchant his credit, the 
 private individual his character, without fo much as 
 knowing, either who are his enemies, or which way
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 303 
 
 Even thofe perfons whofe greatnefs feems 
 molt to fet them above the reach of public 
 cenfure, and not thofe who leafl feel its effects. 
 They have need of the fuffrages of that vulgar 
 whom they effect to defpife, and who are, af- 
 ter all, the difpenfers of that glory, which is 
 the real object of their ambitious cares. Though 
 all have not fo much fincerity as Alexander, 
 they have equal reafon to exclaim, O People! 
 what tolls do we not undergo, in order to gain your 
 applavje ! 
 
 I confefs that in a State where the People 
 dare not fpeak their fentiments, but with a 
 view to pleafe the ears of their rulers, it is 
 pofTible that either the Prince, or thofe to 
 whom he has trufted his authority, may fome- 
 times miflake the nature of the public fen- 
 timents, or that, for want of that affection 
 of which they are denied all pofTible marks, 
 they may reft contented with infpiring ter- 
 ror, and make themfelves amends in behold- 
 ing the over-awed multitude fmother their 
 complaints. 
 
 they carry on their attacks. But when there exifls a free 
 prefs, an innocent Man immediately brings the matter into 
 open day, and crufhes his adverfaries, at once, by a public 
 challenge to lay before the public the grounds of their 
 lever al imputation?.
 
 3 04 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But when the laws give a full fcope to the 
 People for the expreffion of their fentiments, 
 thofe who govern cannot conceal from them- 
 felves the difagreeable truths which refonnd 
 from all iides. They are obliged to put up 
 even with ridicule ; and the coarfeft jefts are 
 not always thofe which give them the leaft 
 lineafinefs. Like the lion in the fable, they 
 muft bear the blows of thofe enemies whom 
 they depife the mod j and they are, at length, 
 flopped fhort in their career, and compelled 
 to give up thofe unjuft purfuits which they 
 find to draw upon them, inftead of that ad- 
 miration which is the propofed end and reward 
 of their labours, nothing but mortification and 
 difguft. 
 
 In fhort, whoever confidcrs what it is that 
 conftitutes the moving principle of what we 
 call great affairs, and the invincible fenfibility 
 of Man to the opinion of his fellow -creatures, 
 will not hefitate to affirm that, if it were pof- 
 fible for the liberty of the prefs to exift in a 
 defpotic government, and (what is not lefs dif- 
 ficult) for it to exift without changing the 
 conftitution, this liberty of the prefs would 
 alone form a counterpoife to the power of the 
 Prince. If, for example, in an empire of the 
 Eaft, a fanctuary could be found, which, ren-
 
 OF ENGLAND, 305 
 
 dered refpectable by the ancient religion of the 
 people, might enfure fafety to thofe who ihould 
 bring thither their obfervations of any kind, 
 and that from thence printed papers ihould 
 iflue, which, under a certain feal, might be 
 equally refpedted, and which in their daily ap- 
 pearance fhould examine and freely difcufs the 
 co # nduct of the Cadis* the Balhaws, the Vizir, 
 the Divan, and the Sultan himfelf, that 
 would introduce immediately fome degree of 
 liberty. 
 
 CHAP. XIII. 
 
 The SubjeSf continued. 
 
 ANOTHER effect, and a very confiderabie 
 one, of the liberty of the prefs, is, that 
 it enables the People effectually to exert thole 
 means which the Constitution has beftowed on 
 them, of influencing the motions of the Govern- 
 ment. 
 
 It has been obferved in a former place, how 
 it came to be a matter of impoffibility for any 
 large number of men, when obliged to act in a 
 body, and upon the fpot, to take any well- 
 weighed refolution. But this inconvenience, 
 which is the inevitable confequence of their 
 
 X
 
 3 o6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fituation, does in no wife argue a perfonal in- 
 feriority in them, with refpect to the few who, 
 from fome accidental advantages, are enabled 
 to influence their determinations. It is not 
 Fortune, it is Nature, that has made the ef- 
 fential differences between Men : and whatever 
 appellation a imall number of perfons who 
 fpeak without fufficient reflection, may affix 
 to the general body of their fellow-creatures, 
 the whole difference between the Statefman, 
 and many a Man from among what they call 
 the dregs of the People, often lies in the rough 
 outride of the latter; a difguife which may 
 fall off on the firft opportunity; and more than 
 once has it happened, that from the middle 
 of a multitude in appearance contemptible, there 
 have been feen to rife at once Viriatufes, or 
 Spartacufes, 
 
 Time, and a more favourable fituation (to 
 repeat it once more) are therefore the only 
 things wanting to the People ; and the free- 
 dom of the prefs affords the remedy to thefe 
 difadvantagcs. Through its affiftance every in- 
 dividual may, at his leifure and in retirement, 
 inform himfelf of every thing that relates to the 
 qneftions on which he is to take a refolution. 
 Through its affiftance, a whole Nation as it 
 were holds a Council, and deliberates ; flowly 
 indeed (for a Nation cannot be informed like
 
 OF ENGLAND. 307 
 
 an aflembly of Judges), but after a regular 
 manner, and with certainty; Through ir.s af- 
 fiflance, all matters of fact are, at length, made 
 clear; and, through the conflict of the different 
 anfwers and replies, nothing at lalt remains, 
 but the found part of the arguments (<z.) 
 
 (a) This right of publicly difcufling political Subjects, 
 is alone a great advantage to a People Who enjoy it ; and 
 if the Citizens of Geneva, for instance, have preferved 
 their liberty better than the People have been able to do 
 in the other Commonwealths of Switzerland, it is, I think, 
 owing to the extenfive right they poiTefs of making public 
 remon (trances to their Magistrates. To thefe remon- 
 flrances the Magistrates, for inltance the Council of 
 Ttventy-Ji-ve, to which they are ufually made, are obliged 
 to give an anfwer. If this anfwer does not fatisfy the re- 
 monitrating Citizens, they take time^ perhaps two or three 
 weeks, to make a reply to it, which mult alio be anfwer- 
 ed ; and the number of Citizens who go up with each new 
 remonttrance increafes, according as they a;e thought to 
 have reafon on their fide. Thus, the remonftrances 
 which were made fome years ago, on account of the fen- 
 tence againft the celebrated M. RouMeau, and were deli- 
 vered at first by only forty Citizens, were afterwards often 
 accompanied by about nine hundred. This circumstance, 
 together with the ceremony with which thofe remonihances 
 (or Representations, as they more commonly call them) 
 are delivered, his rendered them a great check on the 
 conduct of the Magistrates : they even have been still 
 more ufeful to the Citizens of Geneva, as a preventative 
 than as a remedy ; and nothing is more likely to deter the 
 Magistrates from taking a ftep of any kind thac tlt<3 
 thought that it will give rife to a Reprefcntation.
 
 308 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Hence, though all good Men may not think 
 themfelves obliged to concur implicitly in the 
 tumultuary refolutions of a People whom their 
 Orators take pains to agitate, yet, on the other 
 hand, when this fame People, left to itfelf, 
 perfeveres in opinions which have for a long 
 time been difcuffed in public writings, and 
 from which (it is effential to add) all errors 
 concerning fads have been removed, fuch per- 
 feverance is certainly a very refpeclable decifion ; 
 and then it is, though only then, that we may 
 with fafety fay," the voice of the People is 
 i( the voice of God." 
 
 How, therefore, can the People of England 
 aft, when, having formed opinions which may 
 really be called their own, they think they have 
 juft caufe to complain againft the Adminiftra- 
 tion ? It is, as has been faid above, by means 
 of the right they have of electing their Re- 
 prefentatives ; and the fame method of gene- 
 ral intercourfe that has informed them with 
 regard to the objecls of their complaints, will 
 likewife enable them to apply the remedy to 
 them. 
 
 Through this means they are acquainted 
 with the nature of the fubjecls that have been 
 deliberated upon in the Affembly of their Re-
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 399 
 
 prefentatives ; they are informed by whom 
 the different motions were made, by whom 
 they were fupported ; and the manner in which 
 the fufFrages are delivered, is fuch, that they 
 always can know the names of thofe who have 
 voted conftantly for the advancement of perni- 
 cious meafures. 
 
 And the People not only know the par- 
 ticular difpofitions of every Member of the 
 Houfe of Commons ; but the general noto- 
 riety of all things gives them alfo a know- 
 ledge of the political fentiments of a great 
 number of thofe, whom their fituation in life 
 renders fit to fill a place in that -Houfe. 
 And availing themfelves of the feveral va- 
 cancies that happen, and ftill more of the op- 
 portunity of a general election, they purify 
 either fucceffively, or at once, the Legiflative 
 AfTembly ; and thus, without any commo- 
 tion or danger to the State, they effect a ma- 
 terial reformation in the views of the Govern- 
 ment. 
 
 I am aware that fome perfons will doubt 
 thefe patriotic and fyftematic views, which 
 I am here attributing to the People of England, 
 and will object to me the diforders that fome- 
 times happen at Elections, But this reproach 
 
 x 3
 
 31 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 which, by the way, conies with but little pro- 
 priety from Writers who would have the People 
 tranfact every thing in their own peribns, this 
 reproach, I fay, though true to a certain degree, 
 is not however fo much fo as it is thought by 
 certain perfons who have taken only a fuperficiai 
 furvey of the flate of things. 
 
 Without doubt, in a Constitution in which 
 all important caufes of uneaiinefs are fo effec- 
 tually prevented, it is impoflible but that the 
 People will have long intervals of inattention. 
 Being then called upon, on a fudden, from this 
 ftate of inactivity, to elect Representatives, they 
 have not examined, beforehand, the merits of 
 thofe who afk them their votes ; and the latter 
 have not had, amidfl the general tranquillity, 
 any opportunity to make themfelves known to 
 them. 
 
 The Elector, perfuaded, at the fame time, 
 that the perfon whom he will elect, will be 
 equally interefted with himfelf in the fupport 
 pf public liberty, does not enter into laborious 
 difquifitions, and from which he fees he may 
 exempt himfelf. Obliged, however, to give 
 the preference to fomebody, he forms his 
 choice on motives which would not be excuf- 
 ftble, if it were not that fome motives are
 
 OF ENGLAND. 311 
 
 neceffary to make a choice, and that, at this in- 
 flant, he is not influenced by any other: and 
 indeed it muft be confeffed, that, in the ordinary 
 courfe of things, and with Electors of a certain 
 rank in life, that Candidate who gives the bell 
 entertainment, has a great chance to get the 
 better of his competitors. 
 
 But if the meafures of Government, and the 
 reception of thofe meafures in Parliament, by 
 means of a too complying Houfe of Commons, 
 mould ever be fuch as to fpread a ferious alarm 
 among the People, the fame caufes which have 
 concurred to eftablifh public liberty, would, no 
 doubt, operate again, and likewife concur in its 
 fupport. A general combination would then 
 be formed, both of thofe Members of Parlia- 
 ment who have remained true to the public 
 caufe, and of perfons of every order among the 
 People. Public meetings, in fuch circumftances, 
 would be appointed, general fubfcriptions would 
 be entered into, to fupport the expences, what- 
 ever they might be, of fuch a necefTary op- 
 pofition ; and all private and unworthy pur- 
 pofes being fupprelTed by the fenfe of the Na- 
 tional danger, the choice of the electors would 
 then be wholly determined by the confider* 
 
 x 4
 
 3 i2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ation of the public fpirit of the Candidates, and 
 the tokens given by them of fuch fpirit. 
 
 Thus were thofe Parliaments formed, which 
 fuppreffed arbitrary taxes and imprisonments. 
 Thus was it, that, under Charles the Second, 
 the People, when recovered from that enthufi- 
 afm of affection with which they received a 
 King fo long perfecuted, at laft returned to him 
 no Parliaments but fuch as were compofed of a 
 majority of Men attached to public liberty. 
 Thus it was, that, perfevering in a condudt 
 which the circumltances of the times rendered 
 necelTary, the People baffled the arts of the 
 Government ; and Charles difTolved three fuc- 
 ceffive Parliaments, without any other effecl: but 
 that of having thofe fame Men re-chofen, and 
 fet again in pppofition to him, of whom he 
 hoped he had rid himfelf for ever. 
 
 Nor was James the Second happier in his 
 attempts than Charles had been. This Prince 
 foon experienced that his Parliament was ac- 
 tuated by the fame fpirit as thofe which had 
 pppofed the defigns of his late brother ; and 
 Jiaving fuffered himfelf to be led into mea- 
 sures of violence, inftead of being better 
 taught by the difcovery he made of the real fen? 
 iiments of the People, his reign was terminated
 
 OF ENGLAND, 3 J 3 
 
 by that cataftrophe with which every one is 
 acquainted. 
 
 Indeed, if we combine the right enjoyed 
 by the People of England, of electing their 
 Representatives, with the whole of the Eng- 
 lish Government, we fhall become continually 
 more and more fenfible of the excellent ef- 
 fects that may refult from that right. All Men 
 jn the State are, as has been before obferved, 
 really interefted in the fupport of public li- 
 berty j nothing but temporary motives, and 
 fuch as are quite peculiar to themfelves, can 
 poffibly induce the Members of any Houfc of 
 Commons to connive at meafures deftructive 
 pf this liberty : the People, therefore, under 
 fuch circumftances, need only change thefe 
 Members in order effectually to reform the 
 conduct of that Houfe : and it may fairly be 
 pronounced beforehand, that a Houfe of Com- 
 mons, compofed of a new fet of perfons, will, 
 from this bare circumftance, be in the interefls 
 of the People. 
 
 Hence, though the complaints of the People 
 do not always meet with a fpeedy and im- 
 mediate redrefs (a celerity which would be 
 the fymptom of a fatal unfteadinefs in the 
 Conftitution, and would fooner or later bring 
 on its ruin) yet, when we attentively confider
 
 3 i4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the nature and the refources of this Confuta- 
 tion, we fhall not think it too bold an affertion 
 to fay, that it is impoflible but that complaints 
 in which the People perfevcre, that is, to re- 
 peat it once more, well-grounded complaints, 
 will fooner or later be redreffed. 
 
 CHAP. XIV. 
 
 Right of Refinance. 
 
 BUT all thofe privileges of the People, con- 
 iidered in themfelves, are but feeble de- 
 fences againft the real ftrength of thole who 
 govern. All thofe provifions, all thofe reci- 
 procal Rights, nccefTarily fuppofe that things 
 remain in their legal and fettled courfe : 
 what would then be the refource of the People, 
 \i ever the Prince, fuddenly freeing him- 
 felf from all reftraint, and throwing himfelf 
 as it were out of the Conftitution, lhould no 
 longer refpe<t either the perfon, or the pro- 
 perty of the fubject, and either mould make 
 no account of his convention with his Par- 
 liament, or attempt to force it implicitly to 
 iubmit to his will ? It would be refinance.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 315 
 
 Without entering here into the difcuffion 
 of a doctrine which would lead us to enquire 
 into the firft principles of Civil Government, 
 confequently engage us in a long difquifition, 
 and with regard to which, befides, perfons 
 free from prejudices agree pretty much in their 
 opinions, I fhall only obferve here (and it 
 will be fufficient for my purpofe) that the 
 queftion has been decided in favour of this 
 doctrine by the Laws of England, and that 
 refiftance is looked upon by them as the ulti- 
 mate and lawful refource againft the violences 
 of Power, 
 
 It was refiftance that gave birth to the Great 
 Charter, that lading foundation of Englifli 
 Liberty ; and the exceffes of a Power eftablim- 
 ed by force, were alfo reftrained by force (a). 
 It has been by the fame means that, at dif- 
 
 (a) Lord Lyttelton fays extremely well, in his Per- 
 fian Letter?, " If the privileges of the People of 
 " England be conceffions from the Crown, is not the 
 " power of the Crown itfelf, a conceffion from the 
 " People ?" It might be faid with equal truth, and 
 fomewhat more in point to the fubjedl of this Chapter, - 
 If the privileges of the People be an encroachment 
 on the power of Kings, the power itfelf of Kings 
 was at fiift an encroachment (no matter whether efr 
 fe&ed by furprize) on the natural liberty of the 
 People.
 
 3 i6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ferent times, the People have procured the con- 
 firmation of the fame Charter. Laftly, it 
 has alfo been the Refiftance to a King who 
 made no account of his own engagements, 
 that has, in the iffue, placed on the Throne 
 the family which is now in poffelTion of it. 
 
 This is not all; this refource which, till 
 then had only been an act of force, oppofed 
 to other ads of force, was, at that aera, ex- 
 prefly recognized by the Law itfelf. The 
 Lords and Commons, folemnly affembled, de- 
 clared, that " King James the Second, having 
 endeavoured to fubvert the Conftitution of 
 " the Kingdom, by breaking the original 
 " contract between King and People, and hav- 
 " ing violated the fundamental laws, and 
 " withdrawn himfelf, had abdicated the Go- 
 (l vernment ; and that the Throne was thereby 
 " vacant (a)." 
 
 . And left thofe principles to which the Re- 
 volution thus gave a fanclion, mould, in pro- 
 cefs of time, become mere arcana of State, 
 exclusively appropriated, and only known to 
 a certain clafs of Subjects, the fame Act, we 
 have juft mentioned, exprefly infured to ii> 
 
 (a) The Bill of Rights has fince given a new fandlion 
 to all thefe principles. 
 
 8
 
 OFENGLAND. 317 
 
 dividuals the right of publicly preferring com- 
 plaints againft the abufes of Government, 
 and moreover, of being provided with arms 
 for their own defence. Judge Blackftone ex- 
 preffes himfelf in the following terms, in his 
 Commentaries on the Laws of England, 
 (B. I. Ch. i.) . 
 
 " And laftly, to vindicate thofe rights, 
 " when actually violated or attacked, the 
 " fubjects of England are entitled, in the 
 " firit place, to the regular adminiftration, 
 " and free courfe of juftice in the Courts of 
 " law ; next, to the right of petitioning the 
 " King and Parliament for redrefs of griev- 
 " ances ; and, laflly, to the right of hav- 
 " ing and ufing arms for felf-prefervation and 
 '* defence." 
 
 Laftly, this right of oppoflng violence, in 
 whatever fhape, and from whatever quarter 
 it may come, is fo generally acknowledged, 
 that the Courts of law have fometimes ground- 
 ed their judgments upon it. I fhall relate 
 on this head a fadt which is fomewhat re- 
 markable. 
 
 A Conftable, being out of his precinft, 
 arrefted a woman whofe name was Anne Dekins ; 
 one 'Tooly took her part, and in the heat of the 
 fray, killed the afitftant of the Conftable.
 
 3 i8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Being profccuted for murder, he alledged, 
 in his defence, that the illegality of the im~ 
 prifonment was a fulflcient provocation to make 
 the homicide excufable, and intitle him to the 
 benefit of Clergy. The Jury having fettled 
 the matter of fad:, left the criminality of it to 
 be decided by the Judge, by returning afpecial 
 verdifii. The caufe was adjourned to the King's 
 Bench, and thence again to Serjeants Inn, for 
 the opinion of the twelve Judges. Here fol- 
 lows the opinion delivered by Chief Juftice 
 Holt, in giving judgment. 
 
 " If one be imprifoned upon an unlawful 
 " authority, it is a fufficient provocation to 
 " ail people, out of companion, much more 
 " fo when it is done under colour of juftice; 
 " and when the liberty of the fubjett is in- 
 < vaded, it is a provocation to all the fubjeCts 
 " of England. A Alan ought to be con- 
 " cerned for Magna Ckarta and the laws; 
 " and if any one againft law imprifon a Man, 
 he is an ofFendei againft Magna Charta." 
 After fome debate, occafioned chiefly by 
 Tooly's appearing not to have known that the 
 Conftable was out of his precinct, feven of 
 the Judges were of opinion that the prifoner
 
 OF ENGLAND. 319 
 
 was guilty of Manflaughter, and he was ad- 
 mitted to the benefit of Clergy (a). 
 
 But it is with refpect to this right of an ul- 
 timate reiiibnce, that the advantage of a free 
 prefs appears in a mod confpicuous light. As 
 the molt important rights of the People, with- 
 out the profped: of a refinance which over- 
 awes thofe who fhould attempt to violate them, 
 are little more than mereihadows, fo this right 
 of rejijling, itfelf, is but vain, when there ex- 
 iits no means of effecting a general union be- 
 tween the different parts of the People. 
 
 Private individuals, unknown to each other, 
 are forced to bear in filence injuries in which 
 they do not fee other people take a concern. 
 Left to their own individual ftrength, they 
 tremble before the formidable and ever-ready 
 power of thofe who govern ; and as thefe latter 
 well know, nay, are apt to over-rate the ad- 
 vantages of their own fituation, they think 
 that they may venture upon any thing. 
 
 But when they fee that all their actions 
 are expofed to public view, that in confe- 
 quence of the celerity with which all things 
 
 {a) See Reports of Cafes argued, debated, and ad- 
 judged in Banco Regina, in the time of the !a:e Q^een 
 Anne.
 
 320 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 become communicated, the whole Nation forms* 
 as it were, one continued irritable body, no 
 part of which can be touched without exciting 
 an univerfal tremor, they become fenfible that 
 the caufe of each individual is really the caufe 
 of all, and that to attack the loweft among the 
 People, is to attack the whole People. 
 
 Here alfo we muft remark the error of thofe 
 who, as they make the liberty of the people 
 to confift in their power, fo make their power 
 confift in their action. 
 
 When the People are often called to adt 
 in their own perfons, it is impofTible for 
 them to acquire any exact knowledge of the 
 ftate of things. The event of one day effaces 
 the notions which they had begun to adopt on 
 the preceding day ; and amidft the continual 
 change of things, no fettled principle, and 
 above all no plans of union, have time to be 
 cftablifhed among them. You wifh to have 
 the People love and defend their laws and 
 liberty; leave them, therefore, the neceffary 
 time to know what laws and liberty are, and 
 to agree in their opinion concerning them ; 
 you wifh an union, a coalition, which cannot 
 be obtained but by a flow and peaceable pro- 
 cefs, forbear therefore continually to fhake the 
 veffel.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 321 
 
 Nay farther, it is a contradiction, that the 
 People mould aft, and at the fame time retain 
 any real power. Have they, for iriftance, 
 been forced by the weight of public oppref- 
 fion to throw off the reftraints of the law, 
 from which they no longer received protec- 
 tion, they prefently find themfelves fuddenly 
 become fubjedt to the command of a few 
 Leaders, who are the more abfolute in pro- 
 portion a9 the nature of their power is lefs 
 clearly afcertained : nay, perhaps, they muft 
 even fubmit to the toils of war, and to mili- 
 tary difcipline. 
 
 If it be in the common and legal courfe 
 of things that the People are called to move, 
 each individual is obliged, for the fuccefs of 
 the meafures in which he is then made to 
 take a concern, to join himfelf to fome party ; 
 nor can this party be without a Head. The 
 Citizens thus grow divided among themfelves, 
 and contract the pernicious habit of fubmit- 
 ting to Leaders. They are, at length, no 
 more than the clients of a certain number of 
 Patrons; and the latter foon becoming able to 
 command the arms of the Citizens in the fame 
 manner as they at fi?ft governed their votes, 
 make little account of a People with one par: 
 of which they know how to curb the other. 
 
 Y
 
 3 22 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But when the moving fprings of Govern- 
 ment are placed entirely out of the body of 
 the People, their action is thereby difengaged 
 from all that could render it complicated, or 
 hide it from the eye. As the People thence- 
 forward confider things fpeculatively, and 
 are, if I may be allowed the expreffion, only 
 fpectators of the game, they. acquire juft no- 
 tions of things ; and as thefe notions, amidft 
 the general quiet, get ground and fpread 
 themfelves far and wide, they at length en- 
 tertain, on the fubject of their liberty, but one 
 opinion. 
 
 Forming thus, as it were, one body, the 
 People, at every inftant, have it in their power 
 to ftrike the deciiive blow which is to level 
 everv thing. Like thofc mechanical powers 
 the greateft efficiency of which exifts at the 
 inftant which precedes their entering into ac- 
 tion, it has an immenfe force, juft becaufe 
 it does not yet exert any ; and in this ftate 
 of ftillncfs, but of attention, confifts its true 
 
 momentum. 
 
 With regard to thofe who (whether from 
 perfonal privileges, or by virtue of a com- 
 million from the People) are intruded with 
 the adive part of Government, as they, in 
 the mean while, fee themfelves expofed to
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 323 
 
 public view, and obferved as from a diftance 
 by Men free from the fpirit of parry, and who 
 place in them but a conditional trull, they 
 are afraid of exciting a commotion which, 
 though it might not prove the deilruftion of 
 all power, yet would furely and immediately 
 be the dcftruftion of their own. And if we 
 might fuppofe that, through an extraordinary 
 conjunction of circumftances, they mould re- 
 folve among themfelves upon the facrifice of 
 thofe laws on which public liberty is founded, 
 they would no fooner lift up their eyes to- 
 wards that extenfive Affembly which views 
 them with a watchful attention, than they 
 would find their public virtue return upon 
 them, and would make hafte to rcfume that 
 plan of conduct out of the limits of which 
 they can expect: nothing but ruin and perdi- 
 tion. 
 
 In fhort, as the body of the People cannot 
 act ' without either fubjefting themfelves to 
 fome Power, or effecting a general dcftruftion, 
 the only mare they can have in a Government 
 with advantage to themfelves, is not to inter- 
 fere, but to influence, to be able to aft, and 
 not to aft. 
 
 The Power of the People is not when they 
 {hike, but when they keep in awe : it is 
 
 Y 2
 
 S 24 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 when they can overthrow every thing, that 
 they never need to move ; and Manlius in- 
 cluded all in four words, when he faid to 
 the People of Rome, OJiendite helium, pacem 
 habebitis. 
 
 CHAP. XIV. 
 
 Proofs drawn from Faffs, of the Truth of the 
 Principles laid down in the prefent Work. 
 i. The peculiar Manner in which Revolutions 
 have always been concluded in England. 
 
 T may not be fufficient to have proved by 
 arguments the advantages of the Englifh 
 Constitution : it will perhaps be afked, whe- 
 ther the effects correfpond to the theory ? 
 To this queflion (which I confefs is extremely 
 proper) my anfwer is ready ; it is the fame 
 which was once made, I believe, by a Lace- 
 demonian, Ccme and fee. 
 
 It we perufe the Englifh Hiftory, we fhall 
 be particularly {truck with one circumflance 
 to be obferved in it, and which diftinguifhes 
 mod advantageoufly the Englifh Government 
 from all other free governments; I mean the
 
 OF ENGLAND. $1$ 
 
 manner in which Revolutions and public com- 
 motions have always been terminated in Eng- 
 land. 
 
 If we read with fome attention the Hiftory 
 of other free States, we fhall fee that the public 
 difTeniions that have taken place in them, have 
 conftantly been terminated by fettlements in 
 which the interefts only of a few were really 
 provided for; while the grievances of the many 
 were hardly, if at all, attended to. In Eng- 
 land the very reverfe has happened, and we find 
 Revolutions always to have been terminated by 
 extenfive and accurate provifions for fecuring 
 the general liberty. 
 
 The Hiftory of the ancient Grecian Com- 
 monwealths, but above all of the Roman Re- 
 public, of which more complete accounts have 
 been left us, afford ftriking proof of the for- 
 mer part of this obfervation. 
 
 What was, for inftance, the confequence 
 of that great Revolution by which the Kings 
 were driven from Rome, and in which the 
 Senate and Particians adted as the advifers 
 and leaders of the People ? The confequence 
 was, as we find in Dionyfius of Halicarnaflus, 
 and Livy, that the Senators immediately af- 
 fumed all thofe powers lately fo much com- 
 plained of by themfelves, which the Kings
 
 326 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 had exercifed. The execution of their future 
 decrees was intruded to two Magiflrates, taken 
 from their own body, and entirely dependent 
 on them, whom they called Confuls, and who 
 were made to bear about them all the enfio-ns 
 of power which had formerly attended the 
 Kings. Only, care was taken that the axes 
 and fcifecs, the fymbols of the power of life 
 and death over the Citizens, which the Senate 
 now claimed to itfelf, mould not be carried 
 before both Confuls at once, but only before 
 one at a time, for fear, fays Livy, of doubling 
 the terror of the People (a). 
 
 Nor was this all : the Senators drew over 
 to their party thole Men who had the moil 
 intcrcft at that time among the People, and 
 admitted them as Members into their own 
 body ('>) ; which indeed was a precaution they 
 could not prudently avoid taking. But the 
 interefls of the great Men in the Republic 
 being thus provided for, the Revolution ended. 
 The new Senators, as well as the old, took 
 care not to leffen, by making provifions for the 
 
 (a) " Omnia jura (Regum) omnia infignia., primi Con- 
 " fules tenuere ; id raodb cautum eft ne n ambo fafces 
 " haberent, duplicates terror videretur." Tit. Li~j. lib. ii. 
 
 h i. 
 
 [b) Thcfe new Senators were called conferipti : hence 
 the name of Patres Conferipti, afterwards indiscriminately 
 riven to the whole Senate. Tit. Liv. ibid.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 327 
 
 liberty of the People, a power which was now 
 become their own. Nay, they prefently ftretch- 
 ed this power beyond its former tone ; and 
 the punifhments which the Conful inflicted 
 in a military manner on a number of thofe 
 who ftill adhered to the former mode of Go- 
 vernment, and even upon his own children, 
 taught the People what they had to expect for 
 the future, if they prefumed to oppofe the 
 power of thofe whom they had thus unwarily 
 made their Matters. 
 
 Among the opprefllve laws, or ufages, which 
 the Senate, after the expuliion of the Kings, 
 had permitted to continue, thofe which were 
 molt complained of by the People, were thofe 
 by which thofe Citizens who could not pay 
 their debts with the intcrcft (which at Rome 
 was enormous) at the appointed time, became 
 flaves to their Creditors, and were delivered 
 over to them bound with cords : hence the 
 word Nexi, by which that kind of Slaves were 
 denominated. The cruelties excrcifed by Cre- 
 ditors on thofe unfortunate Men, whom the 
 private calamities cauled by the frequent wars 
 in which Rome was engaged, rendered very 
 numerous, at laft roufed the body ot the 
 People : they abandoned both the City, and 
 their inhuman fellow-citizens, and retreated to 
 the other fide of the River Anio. 
 
 Y 4
 
 ^28 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But this fccond Revolution, like the former^ 
 only procured the advancement of particular 
 perfons. A new office was created, called the 
 Tribunefhip. Thofe whom the People had 
 placed at their head when they left the City, 
 were raifed to it. Their duty, it was agreed, 
 v/as for the future to prated: the Citizens ; 
 and they were inverted with a certain number 
 of prerogatives for that purpofe. This Infti- 
 tution, it mult however be confeffed, would 
 have, in the ifTue, proved very beneficial to the 
 People, at leaft for a long courfe of time, if 
 certain precautions had been taken with refpecl 
 to it, which would have much leiTened the fu- 
 ture perfonal importance of the newTribunes (a): 
 but thefe precautions the latter did not think 
 proper to fugged ; and in regard to thofe 
 abufes themfelves which had at firft given rife 
 to the complaints of the People, no farther 
 mention was made of them (b). 
 
 As the Senate and Patricians, in the early 
 ages of the Commonwealth, kept clofely united 
 together, the Tribunes, for all their perfonal 
 
 [a) Their number, which was only Ten, ought to have 
 "been much greater ; and they never ought to have ac= 
 ceptecl the power left to each of them, of flopping by his 
 tingle oppofition the proceedings of all the reft. 
 
 {b) A number of (editions were afterwards raffed upon 
 he fame account.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 329 
 
 privileges, were not able, however, during the 
 firft times after their creation, to gain an admit* 
 tance either to the Confulfhip, or into the 
 Senate, and thereby to feparate their condition 
 any farther from that of the People. This 
 fituation of their's, in which it was to be wifhed 
 they might always have been kept, produced 
 at firfl excellent effects, and caufed their con- 
 duct to anfwer in a great meafure the expecta- 
 tions of the People. The Tribunes complained 
 loudly of the exorbitancy of the powers pofTeffed 
 by the Senate and Confuls ; and here we mull: 
 obferve, that the power exercifed by thefe latter 
 over the lives of the Citizens, had never been 
 yet fubje&ed (which will probably furprife the 
 Reader), to any known laws, though fixty years 
 had already elapfed fince the expulfion of the 
 Kings. The Tribunes therefore infilled, that 
 laws mould be made in that refpedt, which the 
 Confuls mould thenceforwards be bound to fol- 
 low; and that they mould no longer be left, 
 in the exercife of their power over the lives of 
 the Citizens, to their own caprice and wanton- 
 nefs (a). 
 
 {a) " Quod Populus in fe jus dederit, eo Confulem 
 (t ufurum ; non ipfos libidinem ac licentiam fuam pre- 
 ' lege habituros." Tit. Liv. lib. iii. $ 9.
 
 33o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Equitable as thefe demands were, the Senate 
 and Patricians oppofed them with great warmth, 
 and either by naming Dictators, or calling in 
 the affiftance of the Priefts, or other means, 
 they defeated for nine years together, all the 
 endeavours of the Tribunes. However, as the 
 latter were at that time in earner!:, the Senate 
 was at length obliged to comply; and the Lex 
 Terentilla was pafled, by which it was enacted, 
 that a general Code of Laws ihould be made. 
 
 Thefe beginnings feemed to promife great 
 fuccefs to the caufe ot the People. But, unfor- 
 tunately for them, the Senate found means to 
 have it agreed, that the office of Tribune mould 
 be fet afide during the whole time that the Code 
 Ihould be framing.' They moreover obtained, 
 that the ten Men, called Decemvirs, to whom 
 the charge oi" compelling this Code was to be 
 given, fliould be taken from the body of the 
 patricians. The fame caufes, therefore, pro- 
 duced again the fame effects ; and the po ver ot 
 the Senate and Conful was left in the new Code, 
 or laws of the Twelve Tables, as undtnned as 
 before. As to the laws above mentioned, con- 
 cerning debtors, which never had ccaled to be- 
 bitterly complained of by the People, and in 
 regard to which feme fatisfaction ought in com-
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 331 
 
 iiion juftice, to have been given them, they were 
 confirmed, and a new terror added to them from 
 the manner in which they were worded. 
 
 The true motive of the Senate, when they 
 thus milled the framing of the new laws to a 
 new kind of Magillrates, called Decemvirs, 
 was that, by fufpending the ancient office of 
 Conful, they might have a fair pretence for fuf- 
 pending alfo the office of Tribune, and there- 
 by rid themfelves of the People, during the 
 time that the important bulinefs of framing 
 the Code mould be carrying on : they even, in 
 order the better to fecure that point, placed the 
 whole power in the Republic, in the hands of 
 thefe new Magillrates. But the Senate and Pa- 
 tricians experienced then, in their turn, the 
 danger of entrullin; Men with an uncontrolled 
 authority. As they themfelves had formerly 
 betrayed the trull which the People had placed 
 in them, fo did the Decemvirs, on this occa- 
 lion, likewife deceive them. They retained, 
 by their own private authority, the unlimited 
 power that had been conferred on them, and at 
 laft exercifed it on the Patricians as weli as the 
 Plebeians. Both parties therefore united againft 
 them, and the Decemvirs were expelled from 
 the City.
 
 jji THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The former dignities of the Republic were 
 r-eflored, and with them the office of Tribune. 
 Thofe from among the People who had been 
 molt inftrumental in deftroying the power of 
 the Decemvirs, were, as it was natural, raifed 
 to the Tribuncmip ; and they entered upon 
 their offices pofTeffed of a prodigious degree 
 of popularity. The Senate and the Patricians 
 were, at the fame time, funk extremely low 
 m confequence of the long tyranny which had 
 juft expired ; and thofe two circumftances 
 united, afforded the Tribunes but too eafy an 
 opportunity of making the prefent Revolution 
 end as the former ones had done, and con- 
 verting it to the advancement of their own 
 power. They got new perfonal privileges to 
 be added to thofe which they already pof- 
 leffed, and moreover procured a law to be cn- 
 nfted, by which it was ordained, that the re- 
 folutions taken by the Comltia 'Tributa (an Af- 
 fembly in which the Tribunes were admitted 
 to propofe new laws) fhould be binding upon 
 the whole Commonwealth : by which they 
 at once raifed to themfelvcs an impcrium in im- 
 prrio, and acquired, as Livy expreffes it, a molt 
 active weapon (<?). 
 
 (<?) Acerrhnum ttlnm.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 333 
 
 From that time great commotions arofe in 
 the Republic, which, like all thofe before them, 
 ended in promoting the power of a few. 
 Propofals for ealing the people of their debts, 
 for dividing with fome equality amongft the 
 Citizens the lands which were taken from 
 the enemy, and for lowering the rate of the 
 intereft of money, were frequently made by 
 the Tribunes. And indeed all thefe were 
 excellent regulations to propofe ; but, unfor- 
 tunately for the People, the propofals of them 
 were only pretences made ufe of by the Tri- 
 bunes for promoting fchemes of a fatal though 
 fomewhat remote, tendency, to public liberty. 
 Their real aims v/ere at the Confulfhip, the 
 Prstorfhip, the Prieilhood, and other offices of 
 Executive power, which they were intended 
 to controul, and not to lhare. To thefe views 
 they conftantly made the caufe of the People 
 fubfervient : I mall relate among other 
 inflances, the manner in which they procured 
 to themfelves an admittance to the office of 
 Coniul. 
 
 Having, during feveral years, feized every 
 opportunity of making fpeeches to the People 
 on that fubjecl, and even excited feditions 
 in order to overcome the oppofition of the 
 Senate, they at laft availed themfelves of the 
 9
 
 334 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 circumftance of an interregnum (a time, during 
 which there happened to be no other Magistrates 
 in the Republic befides themfelves) and pro- 
 pofed to the Tribes, whom they had affembled, 
 to enadt the three following laws: the fir ft, 
 ior fettling the rate of intereft of money ; the 
 fecond, for ordaining that no Citizen fhould be 
 pofTefled of more than five hundred acres of 
 land; and the third, for providing that one of 
 the two Confuls mould be taken from the body 
 of the Plebeians. But on this occafion it evi- 
 dently appeared, fays Livy, which of the laws 
 in agitation were mod agreeable to the People, 
 and which to thole who propofed them ; for 
 the Tribes accepted the laws concerning the 
 intereft of money, and the lands ; but as 
 to that concerning the Plebeian Confulfhip, 
 they rejected it : and both the former articles 
 would from that moment have been fettled, 
 if the Tribunes had not declared, that the 
 Tribes were called upon, either to accept, 
 or reject, all their three propofals at once (a). 
 
 (a) " Ab Triburiis, velut p?r interregnum, concilio 
 " Plebis habko, apparuit qucc ex pronvjigstis Fleb;, qua; 
 '* latoribus, gratiora client ; nam de fcenoie atque agro 
 " rogationes jubebant, de plebeio Confulacu antiquabant 
 " (antiqttis Jiabantj : & perfeda utraque res efil-r, ni 
 " Tribuni fe in omnia fimul confulere Plebem dixiiTent.'" - 
 Tit. Liv. lib. vi. 39. 
 
 5
 
 OF ENGLAND, 32 $ 
 
 Great commotions enfued thereupon, for a 
 whole year; but at laft the Tribunes, by their 
 perfeverance in infilling that the Tribes mould 
 vote on their three rogations, jointly, obtained 
 their ends, and overcame both the oppo- 
 sition of the Senate, and the reluctance of 
 the People. 
 
 In the fame manner did the Tribunes get 
 themfelves made capable of filling all other 
 places of executive power, and public trull, 
 in the Republic. But when all their views 
 of that kind were accomplished, the Republic 
 did not for all this enjoy more quiet, nor 
 was the intcreft of the People better attended 
 to, than before. New ilruggles then arofe for 
 actual admiflion to thofe places ; for procur- 
 ing them to relations, or friends ; for govern- 
 ments of provinces, and commands of armies. 
 A few Tribunes, indeed, did at times apply 
 themfelves fcriouilv, out of real virtue and 
 love of their duty, to remedv the grievances 
 of the People ; but both their fellow Tribunes, 
 as we mav ice in Hiilory, and the whole body 
 of thofe Men upon whom the People had, at 
 different times, bellowed Confuiihips, ^Edile- 
 fhips, Ccnforfnips, and other dignities without 
 number, united together with the urmoil ve-
 
 336 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 hemence aga'mft them ; and the real Patriots* 
 fuch as Tiberius Gracchus, Caius Gracchus, 
 and Fulvius, constantly perifhed in the at- 
 tempt. 
 
 I have been fomewhat explicit on the ef- 
 fects produced by the different Resolutions 
 that have happened in the Roman Republic* 
 becaufe its Hiftory is much known to us, and 
 we have, either in Dionyfms of HalicarnafTus, 
 or Livy, confiderable monuments of the more 
 ancient part of it. But the Hiilory of the 
 Grecian Commonwealths would alfo have 
 fupplied us with a number of facts to the 
 fame purpofe. That Revolution, for inftance, 
 by which the Pijijlratidtf were driven out of 
 Athens that by which the Four hundred, and 
 afterwards the 'Thirty, were eitablifhed, as well 
 as that by which the latter were in their turn 
 expelled, all ending in fecuring the power of 
 
 a few. The Republic of Syracufe, that 
 
 of Corcyra, of which Thucydides has left us 
 a pretty full account, and that of Florence, 
 of which Machiavel has written the Hiftory, 
 alfo pre fe nt us a feries of public commotions 
 ended by treaties, in which, as in the Roman 
 Republic, the grievances of the People, though 
 ever fo loudly complained of in the beginning 
 bv thofe who acted as their defenders, were,
 
 6F ENGLAND, 337 
 
 in die iffue, mofl carelefsly attended to, or even 
 totally disregarded (d). 
 
 But if we turn our eyes towards the Eng- 
 lish Hiftory, fcenes of a quite different kind 
 will offer to our view ; and we fhn.ll find, 
 on the contrary, that Revolutions in England 
 have always been terminated by making fuch 
 provifions, and only fuch, as all orders of the 
 People were really and indifcriminately to en- 
 joy- 
 
 Moft extraordinary fa&s, thefe ! and which, 
 from all the other circumftances that accom- 
 panied them, we fee, all along, to have been 
 owing to the impoffibility (a point that has 
 been fo much infilled upon in former Chap- 
 ters) in which thofe who poffeffed the confi- 
 dence of the People, were, of transferring to 
 themfelves any branch of the Executive autho- 
 rity, and thus feparating their own condition 
 from that of the reft of the People. 
 
 (a) The Revolutions which have formerly happened 
 in France, have all ended like thofe above menti > ed : 
 of this a remarkable inftance may be feen in th? note {a) 
 p, 29, 30. of this Work. The fame fadls are alfo tu> 
 be obferved in the Hiftory of Spain, Denmark, Swe- 
 den, Scotland, &c. ; but I have avoided mentioning 
 States of a Monarchical form, till fome obfervations are 
 made, which hi Reader will find in the XVIIth Chap- 
 ter,
 
 333 THE CONSITITUTON 
 
 Without mentioning the compacts which were 
 made with the firft Kings of the Norman 
 line, let us only caft our eyes on Magna Charta, 
 which is flill the foundation of Englim liberty. 
 A number of circumftances which has been 
 defcribed in the former part of this work, con- 
 curred at that time to ftrengthen the Regal 
 power to fuch a degree that no Men in the 
 State could entertain a hope of fucceeding 
 in any other defign than that of fetting bounds 
 to it. How great was the union which thence 
 arofe among all orders of the People ! what 
 extent, what caution, do we fee in the provi- 
 fions made by the Great Charter ! All the 
 objects for which men naturally wifh to live 
 in a ftate of Society, were fettled in its thirty- 
 eight Articles. The judicial authority was 
 regulated. The perfon and property of the 
 individual were fecured. The fafety of the 
 Merchant and flranger was provided for. The 
 higher clafs of Citizens gave up a number 
 ot oppremve privileges which they had long 
 fince accuflomed themfelves to look upon as 
 their undoubted rights (a). Nay, the implc- 
 
 [a) All poffeffors of lands took the engagement to 
 eflablilh in behalf of their Tenants and Vaffals (ergo, 
 fuoi) the fame liberties which they demanded from the 
 King. Mag. Char. cap. xxxviii.
 
 OF ENGLAND, 539 
 
 fncnts of tillage of the Bondman, or Slave, 
 were alfo fecured to him ; and for the firft 
 titne perhaps in the annals of the World, a 
 civil war was terminated by making ftipula- 
 tions in favour of thofe unfortunate Men to 
 whom the avarice and lull of dominion inhe- 
 rent in human Nature, continued, over the 
 greateft part of the Earth, to deny the com- 
 mon rights of Mankind. 
 
 Under Henry the Third great disturbances 
 arofe ; and they were all terminated by folemn 
 confirmations given to the Great Charter. Un- 
 der Edward I. Edward II. Edward III. and 
 Richard II. thofe who were intrufted with the 
 care of the interefts of the People, loft no op- 
 portunity that offered, of ftrengthening ftill 
 farther that foundation of public liberty, of 
 taking all fuch precautions as might render the 
 Great Charter ftill more effectual in the event. 
 They had not ceaied to be convinced that their 
 caufe was the fame with that of all the reft of 
 the People. 
 
 Henry of Lancafter having laid claim to 
 the Crown, the Commons received the law 
 from- the victorious party. They fettled the 
 Crown upon Henry, by the name of Henry 
 the Fourth ; and added to the Ad: of Settle- 
 ment, provinons which the Reader may fee in 
 
 Z 2
 
 340 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the fecond Volume of the Parliamentary Hijfsry 
 of England. Struck with the wifdom of the 
 conditions demanded by the Commons, the 
 Authors of the Book jufl mentioned, obferve 
 (perhaps with feme fimplicity) that the Com- 
 mons of England were -no fools at that time. 
 They ought rather to have faid;-^-The Com- 
 mons of England were happy enough to form 
 among themfelves an AlTembly in which every 
 one could propofe what matters he pleafed, 
 and freely difcufs them ; they had no pofli- 
 bility left of converting either thefe advan- 
 tages, or in general the confidence which the 
 People had placed in them, to any private 
 views of their own : they, therefore, without 
 lofs of time endeavoured to llipulate ufeful 
 conditions with that Power by which they 
 faw themfelves at every inflant expofed to 
 be difiblvcd and difperfed, and applied their 
 incluftvy to infure the fafety of the whole 
 people, as it was the only means they had of 
 procuring their own. 
 
 In the long contentions which took place 
 between the Houfes of York and Lancafter, 
 the Commons remained fpedtators of diforders, 
 which in thofe times, it was not in their 
 power to prevent : they fucceflively acknow- 
 ledged the title of the victorious parties ; but
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 34s 
 
 whether under Edward the Fourth, under 
 Richard the Third, 01 Henry the Seventh, by 
 whom thofe quarrels wei .. terminated, they con- 
 tinually availed themfelves of the importance 
 of the fervices which they were able to perforin 
 to the new eftablifhed Sovereign, for obtaining 
 effectual conditions in favour of the whole body 
 of the People. 
 
 At the accefficn of James the Fiift, which, 
 as it placed a new Family on the Throne of 
 England, may be confidered as a kind of Re- 
 volution, no demands were made by the Men 
 who were at the head of the Nation, but in 
 favour of general liberty. 
 
 After the accefiion of Charles the Firft, dis- 
 contents of a very ferious nature began to take 
 place, and they were terminated in the firft 
 inftance, by the Att called the Petition of Right, 
 which is (till looked upon as a mod precife and 
 accurate delineation of the rights of the Peo- 
 ple (a), 
 
 (a) The diforders which took place in the latter part 
 of the reign of that Prince, feem indeed to contain a 
 complete contradiction of the affertion which is the fub- 
 jet of the prefent Chapter ; bat they, at the fame time, 
 are a no lefs c .r.vincing confirmation of the truth of the 
 principles laid 6 wn in courfe of this whole Work. The 
 kbove mentioned diforders took rife from that day in 
 which Charlec the Firft gave up the power cf diffolving 
 
 Z3
 
 54 2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 At the Restoration of Charles the Second, 
 the Conftitution being re-eftablifhed upon its 
 former principles, the former coiifequences 
 produced by it, began again to take place ; 
 and we fee at that sera, and indeed during 
 the whole courfe of that Reign, a continued 
 feries of precautions taken for fe curing the 
 general liberty, 
 
 Laftly, the great event which took place 
 in the year 1689, affords a linking confir- 
 mation of the truth of the obfervation made 
 in this Chapter. At this agra the political 
 wonder again appeared of a Revolution ter- 
 minated by a feries of public Acls in which 
 no interefts but thofe of the People at large 
 were confidered and provided for ; no claufe, 
 even the moft indirect, was inferted, either 
 to gratify the prefent ambition, or favour the 
 future views, of thofe who were perfonally 
 concerned in bringing thofe Acts to a con- 
 clusion. Indeed, if any thing is capable of 
 conveying to us an adequate idea of the found- 
 uefs, as well as peculiarity, of the principles 
 on which the Englifh Government is founded, 
 
 hh Parliament ; that is, from the day in which the Mem- 
 bers of that Aiiembly acquired an independent, perfonal, 
 permanent authority, which they foon began to turn agau>ft 
 the People who had rallied them to it,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 343 
 
 It is the attentive perufal of the Syftem of 
 public Compacts to which the Revolution 
 of the year 1689 gave rife, >of the Bill of 
 Rights with all its different claufes, and 
 of the feveral Acts which under two fubfe- 
 quent Reigns, till the Acceffion of the Houfe 
 of Hanover, were made in order to flrengthen 
 it. ; 
 
 CHAP. XVI. 
 
 Second Difference The Manner after which the 
 Laws for the Liberty of the Subjecl are executed 
 in England, 
 
 THE fecond difference I mean to fpeak of, 
 between the Englifh Government, and 
 that of other free States, concerns the im- 
 portant object of the execution of the Laws. 
 On this article, alfo, we fhall find the advan- 
 tage to lie on the fide of the Englifh Go- 
 vernment; and, if we make a comparifon be- 
 tween the Hiftory of thofe States and that 
 of England, it will lead us to the following 
 
 Z 4
 
 ; 4 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 obfervation, viz. that, though in other free 
 States the laws concerning the Liberty of the 
 Citizens were imperfect, yet the execution of 
 them was ftill more defective. In England, on 
 the contrary, the laws for the fecurity of the 
 Syfbies5t, are not only very extenfive in their pro- 
 visions, buc the manner in which they are exe- 
 cuted, carries thefe advantages tlill farther? 
 and Englim Subjects enjoy no lefs liberty from 
 the ipirit both of juitice and mildnefs, by 
 which all branches of the Government are in- 
 fluenced, than from the accuracy of the laws 
 them (elves. 
 
 The Roman Commonwealth will here again 
 fupply us with examples to prove the former 
 pirt of the above afTe'rtion. When I fajd, in the 
 foregoing Chapter, that, in times of public 
 commotion, no provifions were made for the 
 body of the People, I meant no provifions 
 that were likely to prove effectual in the event. 
 When the People were roufed to a certain de- 
 cree or when their concurrence was neceffary 
 to carry into effed: certain relblutions, or mea- 
 fures, that were particularly interefling to the 
 Men in power, the latter could not, with any 
 prudence, openly profefs a contempt for they
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 345 
 
 political wifhes of the People ; and fome 
 declarations expreffed in general words, in 
 favour of public liberty, were indeed added 
 to the laws that were enacted on thofe occa- 
 fions. But thefe declarations, and the prin- 
 ciples which they tended to eftablifh, were 
 afterwards even openly difregarded in prac- 
 tice. 
 
 Thus, when the People were made to vote, 
 about a year after the expulrlon of the Kings, 
 that the Regal Government never fhould be 
 again eftablifhed in Rome, and that thofe 
 who mould endeavour to reflore it, mould 
 be devoted to the Gods, an article was added 
 which, in general terms, confirmed to the 
 Citizens the right they had before enjoyed 
 under the King, of appealing to the People 
 from the fentences of death palled upon them. 
 No puniihment (which will furprife the Rea- 
 der) was decreed againft thofe who mould 
 violate this law ; and indeed the Confuls, 
 as we may fee in D.ionyfius of HalicarnafTas 
 and Livy, concerned themfelves but little about 
 tl^e appeals of the Citizens, and in the more 
 than military exercife of their functions, con- 
 tinued to fport with rights which they ought to 
 have refpected, however imperfectly and loofely 
 $hey had been fecured.
 
 54-6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 An article to the fame purport with the 
 above, was afterwards alfo added to the laws 
 of the Twelve Tables ; but the Decemvirs, 
 to whom the execution of thofe laws was 
 at firft committed, behaved exactly in the 
 fame manner, and even worfe than the Con- 
 fute had done before them ; and after they 
 were expelled (a) the Magiftrates who fuc- 
 ceeded them, appear to have been as little 
 tender of the lives of the Citizens. I fhall, 
 among many inftances, relate one which will 
 fhew upon what flight grounds the Citizens 
 were expofed to have their lives taken away, 
 Spurious Maelius being accufed of en- 
 deavouring to make himfelf King, was fum- 
 moned by the Matter of the Houfe, to ap- 
 pear before the Dictator, in order to clear 
 himfelf of this fomewhat extraordinary impu- 
 tation. Spurius took refuge among the Peo- 
 ple ; the Matter of the Horfe purfued him, 
 and killed him on the fpot. The multitude 
 
 (a) At the time of the expulfion of the Decemvirs, a 
 law was alfo enacted, that no Magillratc lhould be created 
 from whom no appeal could be made to the People (Ma- 
 pijlratus fine provocations. Tit. &<u. lib, iii. 55.) by 
 which the people exprefsly meant to abolifh the Dictator* 
 {hip : but, from the fact that will jult now be related, and 
 which happened about ten years afterwards, we fhall fee 
 that this law was not better obferved than the former one_j 
 had been.
 
 OFENGLAND, 347 
 
 having thereupon exprefTed a great indig- 
 nation, the Dictator had them called to his 
 Tribunal, and declared that Spurius had been 
 lawfully put to death, even though he might 
 be innocent of the crime laid to his charge, 
 for having refufed to appear before the Dic- 
 tator, when fummoned to do fo by the Mafler 
 of the Houfe (#). 
 
 About one hundred and forty years after 
 the times we mention, the law concerning the 
 appeals to the people, was enacted for the third 
 time. But we do not fee that it was better 
 obferved afterwards than it had been before ; 
 we find it frequently violated, fince that period, 
 by the different Magiftrates of the Republic, 
 and the Senate itlelf, notwithstanding this 
 fame law, at times made formidable exam- 
 ples of the Citizens, Of this we have an 
 inftance in the three hundred foldiers who 
 had pillaged the Town of Rhegium. The 
 Senate, of its own authority ordered them 
 all to be put to death. In vain did the Tri- 
 bune Flaccus remonftrate ao-ainft fo fevere an 
 
 (a) Tumultuantem deinde multitudinem, incerta exiftima- 
 tione fafti, ad concionem vocari juflit, & M-r Hum jure crf-.rn 
 pronunciavit, etiamji regni crhnine i?ifons fuerit , qui voca/us 
 a Magijiro equitum, ad DiSlaiown nan venijfei. Tit. I.iv, 
 
 lib. lv. j ?5-
 
 .:> 
 
 aS the constitution 
 
 exertion of public juftice on Roman Citizens: 
 the Senate, fays Valerius Maximus, neverthc- 
 leis perfifted in its refolution (a). 
 
 All thefe laws for fecuring the lives of the 
 Citizens, had hitherto been enacted without 
 any mention being made of a punilhment 
 againfl: thofe who fhould violate them. At 
 lift the celebrated Lex Porcia was paffed, which 
 lubjedted to banifhment thofe who mould 
 cauls a Roman Citizen to be fcourged and 
 put to death. From a number of inftances 
 pofterior to this law, it appears that it was not 
 better obferved than thofe before it had been : 
 Caius Gracchus, therefore, caufed the Lev 
 Sempronia to be enacted, by which a new 
 fanction was given to it. But this fecond law 
 did not fecure his own life, and that of his 
 friends, better than the Lex Portia had done 
 that of his brother, and thofe who had fup- 
 
 (a) Val. Mai. b,ook ii. c. 7. This Author does not 
 mention the precife number of thofe who were put to 
 death on this occafion ; he only fays that they were exe- 
 cuted fifty at a time, in different fucceffive days ; bui 
 other Authors make the number of them amount to four 
 ihoufand Livy fpeaks of a whole Legion. Legio Campana 
 eux Rhegium cccupaverat, cbfeffa, deditione fa Sid , fecuri per- 
 cuffa ejl. Tit. Liz: lib. xv. Epit. I have here followed 
 Polybius, who fays that only three hundred were take:* 
 and brought to Rome.
 
 OF ENGLAND, 349 
 
 ported him : indeed, all the events which took 
 place about thofe times, rendered it manifeft 
 that the evil was fuch as was beyond the 
 power of any lawb 10 cure. I mall here men- 
 tion a fact which aftoids a remarkable in- 
 ftance of the wantonnefs with which the Ro- 
 man Magistrates had accuftomed themfelves 
 to take away the lives of the Citizens. A 
 Citizen, named Memmius, having put up for 
 the Confulfhip, and publicly canvamng for 
 the fame, in oppofition to a Man whom the 
 Tribune Saturninus fupported, the latter caufed 
 him to be apprehended, and made him expire 
 under blows in the public Forum. The Tri- 
 bune even carried his infolence fo far, as Ci- 
 cero informs us, as to give to this act of 
 cruelty, tranfacted in the prefence of the whole 
 People affembled, the outward form of a law- 
 ful act of public Juftice (a). 
 
 (a) The fatal forms of words ( cruciatus carmina ) nfed 
 by the Roman Magistrates when they ordered a Man to 
 be put to death, refounded (fays Tully in his fpeech for 
 Rabirius) in the AfTembly of the People, in which the 
 Cenfors had forbidden the common Executioner ever to 
 appear. / Littor, coiliga mama. Caput obnubito. Arbcrl 
 infelici fufpendito . Memmius being a considerable Ci- 
 tizen, as we may conclude from his canvaffing with fuc- 
 cefs for the Confulfhip, all the great Men in the Republic 
 *ook the alarm at the atrocious action of the Tribune :
 
 2$* THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Nor were the Roman Magiftrates fatisfied 
 with committing acts of injuftice in their po- 
 litical capacity, and for the fupport of the 
 power of that Body of which they made a 
 part. Avarice and private rapine were at 
 laft added to political ambition. The Pro- 
 vinces were firft opprefTed and plundered. 
 The calamity, in procefs of time, reached 
 Italy itfelf, and the centre of the Republic ; 
 till at laft the Lex Calpurnia de repetundis was 
 enadted to put a flop to it. By this law 
 an action was given to the Citizens and Allies 
 for the recovery of the money extorted from 
 them by Magiftrates, or Men in power ; and 
 the Lex Junta afterwards added the penalty 
 of banilhment to the obligation of making 
 reftitution. 
 
 But here another kind of diforder arofe. 
 The Judges proved as corrupt, as the Ma- 
 giftrates had been oppreflive. They equally 
 betrayed, in their own province, the caufe of 
 the Republic with which they had been in- 
 trufted ; and rather chofe to fhare in the 
 plunder of the Confuls, the Praetors, and the 
 
 the Senate, the next day, ifTued out its folemn mandate, 
 Or form of words, to the Confuls, to provide that the Re- 
 public jkould receive no detriment ; and the Tribune was 
 killed in a pitched battle that was fought at the foot of 
 the Capitol.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 351 
 
 Proconfuls, than put the laws in force againft 
 them. 
 
 New expedients were, therefore, reforted to, 
 in order to remedy this new evil. Laws were 
 made for judging and punifhing the Judges 
 themfelves ; and above all, continual changes 
 were made in the manner of compofmg their 
 Aifemblies. But the malady lay too deep for 
 common legal provifions to remedy. The 
 guilty Judges employed the fame refources in 
 order to avoid conviction, as the guilty 
 Magiftrates had done ; and thofe continual 
 changes at which we are amazed, were 
 made in the ccnftitution of the judiciary 
 Bodies (Y), inftead of obviating the cor- 
 
 (a) The Judges (over the Afiembly of whom the 
 Prstor ufually prefided) were taken from the body of the 
 Senate, till fome years after the laft Punic War ; when 
 the Lex Sempronia, propofed by Cuius S. Gracchus, en- 
 acted that they fhould in future be taken from the 
 Equefhian Order. The Conful Ca:pio procured after- 
 wards a law to be enacled, by which the Judges were to 
 be taken from both orders, equally. The Lex Ser-vilia 
 fcon after put the Equeftrian Order again in pofTeflion of 
 the Jttdg?nents ; and, after fome years, the Lex Li-z-ia 
 reftored them entirely to the Senate. The Lex PlautLj 
 enadled afterward;, that the Judges fhould be taken from 
 the three Order: ; the Senatorian, Equeftrian, and Plebeian. 
 The Lex Cornelia, framed by the Didtator Sylla, enacled 
 again, that the Judges fhould be entirely taken from the
 
 2t THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ruption of the Judges, only transferred to 
 other Men the profit arifing from becoming 
 guilty of it. It was grown to be a general 
 complaint, fo early as the times of the Gracchi, 
 that no Man who had money to give, could 
 be brought to punifhment (a). Cicero fays, 
 that in his time, the fame opinion was be- 
 come fettled and univerfally received () ; and 
 his Speeches are full of his lamentations on 
 what he calls the levity, and the infamy, of the 
 public Judgments. 
 
 Nor was the impunity of corrupt Judges 
 the only evil under which the Republic la- 
 boured. Commotions of the whole Empire 
 at lad took place. The horrid vexations, 
 and afterwards the acquittal, of Aquilius, 
 Proconful of Syria, and of fome others who 
 had been guilty of the fame crimes, drove 
 the Provinces of Afia to defperation : and 
 then it was that that terrible war of Mithri- 
 
 body of the Senate. The Lex Aurelia ordered anew, 
 that they fhould be taken from the three Orders, Pom- 
 pey made afterwards a change in their number, which 
 he fixed at feventy-five, and in the manner of electing 
 them. And laftly, Casfar entirely reftored the Judgment 
 to the Order of the Senate. 
 (a) App. de Bell. Civ. 
 (b) Ad. in Verr. i. i.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 353 
 
 dates arofe, which was ufhered in by the death 
 of eighty thoufand Romans, maffacred in one 
 day, in all the Cities of Afia (a). 
 
 The Laws and public Judgments not only 
 thus failed of the end for which they had 
 been eftablifhed : they even became, at length, 
 new means of oppreffion added to thofe which 
 already exifted. Citizens porTeffed of wealth, 
 perfons obnoxious to particular Bodies, or the 
 few Magistrates who attempted to Hem the 
 torrent of the general corruption, were ac- 
 cufed and condemned ; while Pifo, of whom 
 Cicero in his fpeech againft him relates 
 facts which make the Reader fhudder with 
 horror, and Verres, who had been guilty of 
 enormities of the fame kind, efcaped un- 
 punished. 
 
 Hence a war arofe flill more formidable 
 than the former, and the dangers of which 
 we wonder that Rome was able to furmount. 
 The greateft part of the Italians revolted at 
 once, exafperated by the tyranny of the pub- 
 lic Judgments ; and we find in Cicero, who 
 informs us of the caufe of this revolt, which 
 was called the Sc'ial war, a very expreflive 
 account both of the unfortunate condition of 
 
 {a) Appian. 
 
 Aa
 
 354 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the Republic, and of the perverfion that had been 
 made of the methods taken to remedy it. e An 
 ' hundred and ten years are not yet elapfed 
 ' (fays he) fince the law for the recovery of 
 e money extorted by Magiltrates was firft pro- 
 1 pounded by the Tribune Calpurnius Pifo. A 
 e number of other laws to the fame eftecl:, con- 
 ' tinually more and more fevere, have followed : 
 6 but fo many perfons have been accufcd, fo 
 ( many condemned, fo formidable a war has 
 6 been excited in Italy by the terror of the 
 c public Judgments, and when the laws and 
 ' Judgments have been fufpended, fuch an op- 
 prefTion and plunder of our Allies have pre- 
 ' vailed, that we may truly fay that it is not 
 
 * by our own ftrength, but by the weaknefs of 
 
 * others, that we continue to cxifl (#).' 
 
 I have entered into thefe particulars with 
 regard to the Roman Commonwealth, be- 
 caufe the facts on which they are grounded, 
 arc remarkable of themfelves, and yetnojuit 
 conclufion can be drawn from them, un- 
 lefs a feries of them were prefented to the Rea- 
 der. Nor are we to account for thefe facts, 
 by the Luxury which prevailed in the latter 
 ages of the Republic, by the corruption of 
 
 {a) See Cic, de Off. lib. ii. 75.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 35$ 
 
 the manners of the Citizens, their degene- 
 racy from their ancient principles, and fuch. 
 like loofe general phrafes, which may perhaps 
 be ufeful to exprefs the manner itfelf in which 
 the evil became manifeftedj but by no means 
 fet forth the caufes of it. 
 
 The above diforders arofe from the very na- 
 ture of the Government of the Republic,- 
 of a Government in which the Executive and 
 Supreme Power being made to centre in the 
 Body of thofe in whom the People had once 
 placed their confidence, there remained no 
 other effectual Power in the State that might 
 render it neceflary for them jto keep within the 
 bounds of juftice and decency. And in the 
 mean time, as the People, who were intended 
 as a check over that Body, continually gave a 
 ihare in this Executive authority to thofe whom 
 they entrufted with the care of their interests, 
 they increafed the evils they complained of, 
 as it were at every attempt they made to reme- 
 dy them, and inftead of railing up Opponents 
 to thofe who were become the enemies of 
 their liberty, as it was their intention to do, 
 they continually fupplied them with new Aflb- 
 ciates. 
 
 A a 2.
 
 356 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 From this fituation of affairs, flowed, as an 
 unavoidable confequence, that continual de- 
 fertion of the caufe of the People, which, 
 even in time of Revolutions, when the paf- 
 fions of the People themfelves were roufed, 
 and they were in a great degree united, mani- 
 fefted itfelf in fo remarkable a manner. We 
 may trace the fyptoms of the great political 
 defect here mentioned, in the earlieft ages 
 -of the Commonwealth, as well as in the laft 
 ftage of its duration. In Rome, while fmali 
 and poor, it rendered vain whatever rights 
 or power the People poiTeffed, and blafted 
 all their endeavours to defend their liberty, in 
 the fame manner as, in the more fplendid ages 
 of the Commonwealth, it rendered the molt fa- 
 lutary regulations utterly fruitlefs, and even in- 
 flrumental to the ambition and avarice of a 
 few. The prodigious fortune of the Republic, 
 in fhort, did not create the diforder, it only gave 
 full fcopc to it. 
 
 But if we turn our view towards the Hiftory 
 of the Englifh Nation, we fhall fee how, from 
 a Government in which the above defects did 
 not exift, different confequences have fol- 
 lowed : how cordially all ranks of Men have 
 always united together to lay under proper re- 
 
 5
 
 OF ENGLAND. 357 
 
 ftraints this Executive power, which they knew 
 could never be their own. In times of public 
 Revolutions, the greateft care, as we have be- 
 fore obierved, was taken to afcertain the limits 
 of that Power : and after peace had been re- 
 stored to the State, thofe who remained at the 
 head of the Nation, continued to manifeft an 
 unwearied jealoufy in maintaining thofe advan- 
 tages which the united efforts of all had ob- 
 tained. 
 
 Thus it was made one of the Articles of 
 Magna Charta, that the Executive Power 
 ihould not touch the perfon of the Subject, 
 but in confequence of a judgment pafTed upon 
 him by his Peers ; and fo great was after- 
 wards the general union in maintaining this 
 law, that the Trial by Jury, that admirable 
 mode of proceeding which fo effectually fe- 
 cures the Subject againil all the attempts 
 of Power, even (which feemed fo difficult to 
 obtain) againft fuch as might be made un- 
 der the fanction of the Judicial authority, hath 
 been preferved to this day. It has even been 
 preferved in all its original purity, though 
 the fame has been fucceffively fuffered to de- 
 cay, and then to be loft, in the other Corn- 
 tries of Europe, where it had been formerly 
 
 A3
 
 358 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 known (*), Nay, though this privilege of be- 
 jng tried by one's Peers, was at firft a privilege 
 of Conquerors and Mailers, exclufively appre? 
 priated to thofe parts of Nations which had ori- 
 ginally invaded and feduced the reft by arms, 
 it has in England been fucceflively extended to, 
 every Order of the People. 
 
 And not only the Perfon, but alfo the pror 
 perty, of the individual, has been fecured 
 againft all arbitrary attempts from the Exe- 
 cutive power, and the latter has been fuccefs- 
 
 [a) The Trial by Jury was in ufe among the Normans 
 long before they came over to England ; but it is now 
 utterly loft in that Province : it even began very early to 
 degenerate there from its firft inftitution ; we fee in Hale's 
 Hiftory of the Common haw of England, that the unani- 
 mity among Jurymen was not required in'Noimandy for 
 making a verdict a good verdict ; but when Jurymen 
 diflented, a number of them was taken out, and others 
 added in their ftead, till an unanimity was procured. 
 In Sweden, where, according to the opinion of the 
 "Learned in that Country, the Trial by Jury had its firft 
 prigin, only fome forms of that Inftitution are now pre- 
 ferved in the lower Courts in the Country, where fets of 
 Jurymen are eftablifhed for life, and have a falary ac- 
 cordingly. Sec Robert/on s State cf Sweden. And in 
 Scotland, the vicinity of England, has not been r.ble to. 
 preferve to the Trial bv Jury its genuine ancient form : 
 the unanimity among Jurymen is not required, as I have 
 been told, to form a Veidift ; but the majority is de- 
 pjiJlye,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 359 
 
 lively restrained from touching any part of 
 the property of the Subject, even under pre- 
 tence of the neceffities of the State, any other- 
 wife than by the free grant of the Reprefen- 
 tatives of the People. Nay, fo true and per- 
 fevering has been the zeal of thefe Represen- 
 tatives, in afferting on that account the in- 
 terefts of the Nation, from which they could 
 not feparate their own, that this privilege of 
 taxing themfelves, which was in the begin- 
 ning grounded on a moft precarious tenure, 
 and only a mode of governing adopted by 
 the Sovereign for the fake of his own con- 
 venience, has become, in time, a fettled right 
 of the People, which the Sovereign has found 
 it at length neceffarily folemnly and repeatedly 
 to acknowledge. 
 
 Nay more, the Reprefentatives of the Peo- 
 ple have applied this right of Taxation to a 
 flill nobler ufe than the mere prefervation of 
 property ; they have, in procefs of time, fuc- 
 ceeded in converting it into a regular and con- 
 ititutional means of influencing the motions 
 of the Executive Power. By means of this 
 Right, they have gained the advantage of 
 being conftantly called to concur in the mea- 
 sures of the Sovereign, of having the greateft 
 
 A a 4
 
 3 6o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 attention fhewn by him to their requefts, as 
 well as the higheft regard paid to any engage- 
 ments that he enters into with them. -Thus has 
 it become at laft the peculiar happinefs of Eng- 
 lifh Subjects, to whatever other People either 
 ancient or modern we compare them, to enjoy 
 a fhare in the Government of their Country, by 
 electing Reprefentatives, who, by reafon of 
 the peculiar circumftances in which they are 
 placed, and of the extenfive rights they pof- 
 fefs, are both willing faithfully to ferve thofe 
 who have appointed them, and able to do 
 fo. 
 
 And indeed the Commons have not refted 
 fatisfied with eftablifhing, once for all, the 
 provifions for the liberty of the People which 
 have been juft mentioned ; they have after- 
 wards made the prefervation of them, the 
 firft object of their care (*?), and taken every 
 opportunity of giving them new vigour and 
 life. 
 
 (a) The firft operation cf the Commons, at the begin- 
 ning of a Seffion, is to appoint four grand Committees. 
 The one is a Committee of Religion, another of Courts 
 of Juftice, another of Trade, and another of Grievances : 
 they are to be Handing Committees during the whole 
 Seffion.
 
 OFENGLAND. 361 
 
 Thus, under Charles the Firft, when attacks 
 of a molt alarming nature were made on 
 the privilege of the People to grant free fup- 
 plies to the Crown, the Commons vindicated, 
 without lofs of time, that great right of the 
 Nation, which is the Conftitutional bulwark 
 of all others, and haftened to oppugn in their 
 beginning, every precedent of a practice that 
 muft in the end have produced the ruin of 
 public liberty. 
 
 They even extended their care to abufes of 
 every kind. The judicial authority, for in-. 
 flance, which the Executive Power had im- 
 perceptibly affumed to itfelf, both with ref- 
 pect to the perfon and property of the indivi- 
 dual, was abrogated by the A&. which abolifhed 
 the Court of Star Chamber ; and the Crown 
 was thus brought back to its true Condi- 
 tutional office, viz. the countenancing, and fup- 
 porting with its flrength, the execution of the 
 Laws. 
 
 The fubfequent endeavours of the Legifla- 
 ture have carried even to a (till greater extent 
 the above privileges of the People. They have 
 moreover fucceeded in reflrainins: the Crown 
 from any attempt to feize and confine, even 
 for the morteft time, the perfon of the Sub- 
 ject, unlefs it be in the cafes afcertained by the 
 Law, of which the Judges of it are to decide.
 
 362 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Nor has this extenfive unexampled freedom 
 at the expence of the Executive Power, been 
 made, as we might be inclinable to think, the 
 exclufive appropriated privilege of the great 
 and powerful. It is to be enjoved alike by all 
 ranks of Subjects. Nay, it was the injury done 
 to a common Citizen that gave exigence to 
 the At which has completed the fecurity 
 of this interefling branch of public liberty. 
 Vhe epprefjion of an obfeure individual, fays Judge 
 Blackitone, gave rife to the famous Habeas Corpus 
 Aid : Junius has quoted this obfervation of the 
 Judge ; and the fame is well worth repeating 
 a third time, for the juft idea it conveys of that 
 readinefs of all Orders of Men, to unite in de- 
 fence of common liberty, which is a charac- 
 terise circumftance in the Engliih Govern- 
 ment (a). 
 
 And this general union in favour of public 
 liberty, has not been confined to the framing 
 
 {a} The individual here alluded to was one Francis 
 Jenks, who having made a motion at Guildhall, in ths 
 year 1676, to petition the King for a new Parliament, 
 was examined before the Privy Council, and afterwards 
 committed to the Gate-houfe, where he was kept about 
 two months, through the delays made by the feveial 
 judges to whom he applied, in granting him a Habeas 
 Corpus. See the State Trials, vol. vii. anno 1676.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 363 
 
 @f laws for its fecurity : it has operated with 
 no lefs vigour in bringing to punifhment fuch, 
 as have ventured to infringe them ; and the 
 Sovereign has conftantly found it neceffary to 
 give up the violators of thofe laws, even when 
 his own Servants, to the Juftice of their Coun? 
 try. 
 
 Thus we find, fo early as the reign of Ed- 
 ward the Firfl, Judges who were convicted of 
 having committed exactions in the exercife of 
 their offices, to have been condemned by a 
 fentence of Parliament (a). From the im- 
 menfe fines which were laid upon them, and 
 which it feems they were in a condition to pay, 
 we may indeed conclude that, in thofe early 
 ages of the Conftitution, the remedy was ap- 
 plied rather late to the difcrder; but: yet it 
 was at laft applied. 
 
 Under Richard the Second, examples of 
 the fame kind were renewed. Michael de la 
 Pole, Earl of Suffolk, who had been Lord 
 Chancellor of the kingdom, the Duke of 
 Ireland, and the Archbiihop of York, having 
 
 {a) Sir Ralph de Hengham, Chief Juftice of the King's 
 Bench, was fined 7000 marks; Sir Thomas Waylana, 
 Chief Juftice of the Common Pleas, had his whole eilats 
 forfeited ; and Sir Adam de Stratton, Chief Baron of the 
 Exchequer, was fined 3400 marks.
 
 364 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 abufed their power by carrying on dcfigns that 
 were fubverfive of public liberty, were de- 
 clared guilty of High-treafon ; and a number 
 of Judges who, in their judicial capacity, had 
 a&ed as their inftruments, were involved in 
 the fam$ condemnation (). 
 
 Under the reign of Henry the Eighth, Sir 
 Thowas Empfon, and Edmund Dudley, who 
 
 (a) The moil confpicuous among thefe Judges were 
 Sir Robert Belknap, and Sir Robert Trefilian, Chief 
 Juftice of the King's Bench. The latter had drawn 
 up a firing of queftion=> calculated to confer a defpotic 
 authority on the Crown, or rather on the Minifters 
 above named, who had found means to render them- 
 felves entire Mafters of the perfon of the King. Thefe 
 queltions Sir Robert Trefilian propofed to the Judges, 
 who had been fummoned for that purpofe, and the/ 
 gave their opinions in favour of them. One of thefe 
 opinions of the Judges, among others, tended to no 
 lefs than to annihilate, at one ftroke, all the rights of 
 the Commons, by taking from them that important 
 privilege mentioned before, of ftarting and freely dif- 
 cuffing whatever fubjecls of debate they think proper : 
 the Commons were to be reflrained, under pain of being 
 punifhed as traitors, from proceeding upon any articles 
 befides thofe limited to them by the King. All thofe 
 who had had a fhare in the above declarations of the 
 Judges, were attainted of high treafon. Some were 
 hanged ; among them was Sir Robert Trefilian ; and the 
 others were only banimed, at rhe interceffion of the Bifhops. 
 See the Pari. Hiflory of England, vol. i.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 3$$ 
 
 had been the promoters of the exactions com- 
 mitted under the preceding reign, fell victims 
 to the zeal of the Commons for vindicating 
 the caufe of the People. Under King James 
 the Firft, Lord Chancellor Bacon experienced 
 that neither his high dignity, nor great per- 
 ibnal qualifications, could fcreen him from 
 having the fevereft cenfure paiTed upon him, 
 for the corrupt practices of which he had fuf- 
 fered himfclf to become guilty. And under 
 Charles the Firft, the Judges having attempted 
 to imitate the example of the Judges under 
 Richard the Second, by delivering opinions 
 fubverfive of the rights of the People, found 
 the fame fpirit of watchfulnefs in the Com- 
 mons, as had proved the ruin of the former. 
 Lord Finch, keeper of the Great Seal, was 
 obliged to fly beyond fea. The Judges Daven- 
 port and Crawley were imprifoned : and Judge 
 Berkeley was feized while fitting upon the 
 Bench, as we find in Rufhworth. 
 
 In the reign of Charles the Second, we 
 again find frefh inftances of the vigilance of 
 the Commons. Sir William Scroggs, Lord 
 Chief Juftice of the King's-Bench, Sir Francis 
 North, Chief Juftice of the Common Pleas, 
 Sir Thomas Jones, one of the Judges of the
 
 366 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 King's-Bench, and Sir Richard Wefton, one 
 of the Barons of the Exchequer, were im- 
 peached by the Commons, for partialities 
 fhewn by them in the adminiftration of juftice ; 
 and Chief Juftice Scroggs, againft whom fomc 
 pofitive charges were well proved, was re- 
 in oved from his employments. 
 
 The feveral examples offered here to the 
 Reader, have been taken from feveral different 
 periods of the Englifh Hiftory, in order to 
 Ihew that neither the influence, nor the dig- 
 nity, of the infractors of the laws, even when 
 they have been the neareft Servants of the 
 Crown, have ever been able to check the zeal 
 of the Commons in afferting the rights of 
 the People. Other examples might perhaps 
 be related to the fame pnrpofe ; though the 
 whole number of thoie to be met with, will, 
 upon enquiry, be found the fmallcr, in pro- 
 portion as the danger of infringing the laws 
 has always been indubitable. 
 
 So much regularity has even (from all 
 the cir.cum (lances above mentioned) been in- 
 troduced into the operations of the Executive 
 Power in England, fuch an exact: Juftice 
 have the People been accuftomed, as a confe- 
 quence, to expect from that quarter, that 
 even the Sovereign, for his having once luf-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 367 
 
 fered himfelf perfonally to violate the fafety 
 of the Subject, did not efcape fevere cenfure. 
 The attack made by order of Charles the 
 Second, on the perfon of Sir John Coventry, 
 filled the Nation with aftonifhment ; and this 
 violent gratification of private paffion, on the 
 part of the Sovereign (a piece of felf-indul- 
 gence with regard to inferiors, which whole 
 claries of individuals in certain Countries al- 
 moit think that they have a right to) excited a 
 general ferment. " This event (fays Bifhop 
 t( Burnet) put the Houfe of Commons in a 
 (< furious uproar. ... It gave great advantages 
 iS to all thofe who oppofed the Court ; and 
 " the names of the Court and Country party, 
 ' which till now had fcemed to be forgotten, 
 ({ were again revived (#)." 
 
 Thefe are the limitations that have been 
 fet, in the Englifh Government, on the ope- 
 rations of the Executive Power : limitations 
 to which we find nothing comparable in any 
 other free States, ancient or modern ; and 
 which are owing, as we have fecn, to thac 
 
 () See Barnet's Hiftory, vol i. anno 1669. -An Ad 
 of Parliament was made on this occafion, fcr giving- 
 a farther extent to the provifions before made for the 
 perfonal fecuiity of the Subject , which is (till called the 
 Coventry Aft.
 
 368 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 very circumftance which Teemed at firft fighf: 
 to prevent the pofiibility of them, I mean the 
 greatnefs and unity of that Power ; the effect 
 of which has been, in the event, to unite upon 
 the fame object, the views and efforts of all 
 Orders of the People. 
 
 From this circumftance, that is, the unity 
 and peculiar liability of the Executive Power 
 in England, another moft advantageous con- 
 fequence has followed, that has been be- 
 fore noticed, and which it is not improper 
 to mention again here, as this Chapter is 
 intended to confirm the principles laid down 
 in the former ones, I mean the unremitted 
 continuance of the fame general union among 
 all ranks of Men, and the fpirit of mutual 
 juftice which thereby continues to be diffufed 
 through all orders of Subjects. 
 
 Though furrounded by the many boun- 
 daries that have juft now been defcribed, the 
 Crown, we muft obferve, has preferved its pre- 
 rogative undivided : it (till poiieffes its whole 
 effective flrength, and is only tied by its own 
 ensascments, and the confideration of what 
 it owes to its deareft interefts. 
 
 The great, or wealthy Men in the Nation, 
 who, affifted by the body of the People, have 
 fucceeded in reducing the exercife of its au-
 
 OF ENGLAND. zh 
 
 thority within fuch well defined limits, can 
 have no expectation that it will continue to 
 confine itfelf to them any longer than they 
 themfelves continue, by the juflice of their own 
 conduct, to deferve that fupport of the People, 
 which alone can make them appear of con- 
 fequence in the eye of the Sovereign, no 
 probable hopes that the Crown will continue 
 to obferve thofe laws by which their wealth, 
 dignity, liberty, are protected, any longer 
 than they themfelves alio continue to obferve 
 them. 
 
 Nay more, all thofe claims of their rights 
 which they continue to make againfl the 
 Crown, are encouragements which they give to 
 the felt of the People to afTert their own rights 
 againft them. Their conftant oppofition to 
 all arbitrary proceedings of that Power, is 
 a continual declaration they make againft any 
 acts of opprefiion which the fuperior ad- 
 vantages they enjoy, might entice them to 
 commit on their inferior fellow- fubjects. 
 Nor was that fevere cenfure, for inftance, 
 which they concurred in palling on an un- 
 guarded violent action of their Sovereign, 
 only a reltraint put on the perfonal actions 
 of future Englilh Kings ; no, it was a much 
 more extenlive provifion for the fecuring of 
 
 Bb
 
 37o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 public liberty ; it was a folemn engagement 
 entered into by ail the powerful Men in the 
 State to the whole body of the People, fcru- 
 puloufly to refpect the perfon of the loweft 
 among them. 
 
 And indeed the conftant tenor of the con- 
 duel even of the two Houfes of Parliament 
 mews tis, that the above obfervations are not 
 matters of mere fpeculation. From the ear- 
 Heft times we fee the Members of the Houfe 
 of Commons to have been very cautious not 
 to afTume any diftindtion that might alienate 
 from them the affections of the reft of the 
 People (a). Whenever thofe privileges which 
 were neceflary to them for the difcharge of 
 their truft have proved burdenfome to the 
 Community, they have retrenched them. 
 And thofe of their Members who have ap- 
 plied either thefe privileges, or in general 
 
 ./;) In all cafes of public offences, down to a fimple 
 breach of the peace, the Members of the Houfe of 
 Commons have no privilege whatever above the reft of 
 the People : they may be committed to prifon by any 
 Juftice of the Peace -, and a-e dealt with afterwards in the 
 fame manner as any other Subjecls. With regard to ci- 
 vil matters, their only privilege is to be free from Arrefts 
 during the time of a Seffion, and forty days before, and 
 forty days after ; but they may be fued, by procefs againft 
 their goods, for any juft debt during that time.
 
 OF" ENGLAND. 371 
 
 that influence which they derived from their 
 Situation, to any oppreffive propofes, they* 
 themfelves have endeavoured to bring to pu- 
 nishment. 
 
 Thus, we fee, that in the reign of James 
 the; Firft, Sir Giles MompefTon, a Member 
 of the Houfe of Commons, having been 
 guilty of monopolies, and other acts of great 
 oppreffion on the People, was not only ex- 
 pelled, but impeached and profecuted with 
 the greater! warmth by the Houfe, and finally 
 condemned by the Lords to be publicly de- 
 graded from his rank of a Knight, held for 
 ever an infamous perfon, and imprifoned dur- 
 ing life. 
 
 In the fame reign, Sir John Bennet, who 
 was alfo a Member of the rioufe of Commons, 
 having been found to have been guilty of fe- 
 veral corrupt practices, in his capacitv of 
 Judge of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, 
 fuch as taking exorbitant fees, and the like, 
 was expelled the Houfe, and profecuted for 
 thefe offences. 
 
 In the year 1641, Mr. Henry Benfon, 
 Member for Knarefborough, having been de- 
 tected in felling protections, experienced like- 
 wife the indignation of the Houfe, and was 
 expelled. 
 
 Bb 2
 
 372 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In fine, in order as it were to make it com- 
 pletely notorious, that neither the condition- 
 er Reprefentative of the People, nor even any 
 degree of influence in their Houfe, could ex- 
 cufe any one of them from ftridfly obferving 
 the rules of Juftice, the Commons did on one 
 occufion pafs the mod fevere cenfure they had 
 power to inflict, upon their Speaker himfelf, 
 for having, in a fin g re inflance, attempted to 
 convert the diicharge of his duty as Speaker 
 
 into a means of private emolument. Sir 
 
 John Trevor, Speaker of the Houfe of Com- 
 mona, having, in the fixth year of the reign 
 of King William, received a thoufand gui- 
 neas from the City of London, "as a gra- 
 " tuity for the trouble he had taken with re- 
 " gard to the paffiiig of the Orphan Bill," 
 was voted guilty of a High crime and mif- 
 demeanor, and expelled the Houfe. Even 
 the inconfiuerablc fum of twenty guineas which 
 Mr. Hungcrford, another Member, had been 
 weak enough to accept on the fame fcore, 
 was looked upon as deferving the notice 
 of the Houfe ; and he was likewife ex- 
 pelled'^).- 
 
 a) Other examples of the attention of the Houfe of 
 Common? to the conduft of their Members, might be 
 produced either before, or after, that which is men- 
 tioned here. The reader may, for inftance, fee the re-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 373 
 
 If we turn our view towards the Houfe of 
 Lords, we ftiall find that they have alio con- 
 stantly taken care that their peculiar privi- 
 leges fhoujd not prove impediments to the 
 common juftice which js due to the reft of the 
 People (a). They have conftantly agreed to 
 every juft propofal that has been made to them 
 on that fubject by the Commons : and in- 
 deed, if we confider the numerous and op- 
 preffive privileges claimed by the Nobles in 
 moft other Countries, and the vehement fpirit 
 with which they are commonly aiTerted, we 
 fliall think it no fmall praife to the body of 
 the Nobility in England (and alfo to the na- 
 ture of that Government of which they make 
 
 lation of their proceedings in the affair of the South Sea 
 Company Scheme ; and a few years after, in that of the 
 Charitable Corporation ; a fraudulent fcheme particularly 
 oppreffive to the poor, for which feveral Members were 
 expelled. 
 
 [a) In cafe of a public offence, or even a fimple 
 breach of the peace, a Peer may be committed, till hq 
 finds bail, by any juftice of the peace : and Peers are 
 to be tried by the common courfe of law, for all offences 
 under felony. With regard to civil matters, they are at 
 all times free from arrejls ; but execution may be had 
 againfl their effect:-, in the fame manner as againft thofe, 
 f other Subjects. 
 
 ^ b 3
 
 374 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 a part) that it has been by their free confent 
 that their privileges have been confined to what 
 they now are ; that is to fay, to no more, in 
 general, than what is neceffary to the accom- 
 plifhment of the end and conftitutional defign 
 of that Houfe. 
 
 In the exercife of their Judicial authority 
 with regard to civil matters, the Lords have 
 manifefled a fpirit of equity nowife inferior to 
 that which they have Ihewn in their Legis- 
 lative capacity. They have, in the difcharge 
 of that function, (which of all others is fo 
 liable to create temptations) ihewn an uncor- 
 ruptnefs really fuperior to what any judicial 
 Affembly in any other Nation can boaft. Nor 
 do I think that I run any rifk of being contra- 
 dicted, when I fay that the conduct of the 
 Houfe of Lords, in their civil judicial ca- 
 pacity, has constantly been fuch as has kept 
 them above the reach of even fufpicion or 
 flander. 
 
 Even that privilege which they enjoy, of 
 exclufively trving their own Members, in cafe 
 of any accufation that may affect their life 
 (a privilege which we might at fir ft fight 
 think repugnant to the idea of a regular Go- 
 vernment, and even alarming to the reft of 
 the People) has conftantly been made ufe of
 
 OF ENGLAND. 375 
 
 by the Lords to do juflice to their fellow-fub- 
 jects ; ami if we caft our eyes either on the 
 collection of the State Trials, or on the Hiftory 
 of England, we mall find very few examples, if 
 any, of a Peer, really guilty of the offence laid to 
 his charge, that has derived any advantage from 
 his not being tried by a Jury of Commoners. 
 
 Nor has this juft and moderate conduct of 
 the two Houfcs of Parliament in the exercife 
 of their powers (a moderation fo unlike what 
 has been related of the conduct of the power- 
 ful Men in the Roman Republic; been the 
 only happy confequence of that falutary jea- 
 loufy which thole two Bodies entertain of the 
 power of the Crown. The fame motive has 
 alio engaged them to exert their utmoit endea- 
 vours to put the Courts of Juflice under proper 
 reftraints : a point of the higheft importance 
 to public liberty. 
 
 They have, from the earlieft times, pre- 
 ferred complaints againft the influence of the 
 Crown over thefe Courts, and at laft procured 
 Laws to be enacted by which fuch influence has 
 been intirely prevented : all which meafures, 
 we muft obferve, were at the fame time ftrong 
 declarations that no Subjects, however exalted 
 their rank might be, were to think themfelves 
 exempt from lubmitting to the uniform courfe 
 
 Bb 4
 
 376 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 of the Law, or hope to influence or over-awe it 
 The fevere examples which they have unit- 
 ed to make on t.hofe Judges who had ren- 
 dered themfelves the instruments of the paf- 
 fions ol the Sovereign, or of the defigns of the 
 Ministers of the Crown, are alio awful warn- 
 ings to the Judges who have fucceeded them, 
 never to attempt to deviate in favour of any, 
 the moil powerful individuals, from that flrait 
 line of Juftice which the joint Wifdom of the 
 Legiflature has once marked out to them. 
 
 This lingular Situation of the English Judges 
 relatively to the three Constituent Powers of 
 the State, (and alfo the formidable fupport 
 which they are certain to receive from them 
 as long as they continue to be the faithful 
 Miniflers of Juftice) has at lad created Such 
 an impartiality in the distribution of public 
 Juftice in England, has introduced into the 
 Courts of Law the practice of fuch a thorough 
 difregard of either the influence or wealth of 
 the contending Parties, and procured to every 
 individual, both fuch an eafy accefs to thefe 
 Courts, and fuch a certainty of redrefs, as are 
 not to be paralleled in any other Government,, 
 Philip de Comines, fo long as three hundred 
 years ago, commended in Strong terms the exact- 
 aefs with which Juftice is done in England to
 
 JO F ENGLAND. 377 
 
 all ranks of Subjects () ; and the impartiality 
 with which the fame is adminiftered in thefe 
 clays, will with .ftill more reaibn create the 
 furprize of every Stranger who has an opportu- 
 nity of obferving the cuftoms of this Coun- 
 try (b). 
 
 (a) See page 56 of this Work. 
 
 () A little after I came to England for the nrft time 
 (if the Reader will give me leave to make mention of 
 myfelf in thi cafe) an action was brought in a Court of 
 Juftice aoainft a Prince very nearly related to the Crown ; 
 and a Noble Lord was alio, much about that time, en- 
 gaged in a law-fuit for the property of fome valuable lead- 
 mines in Yorkfhire. I could not but obferve that in both 
 thefe cafes a decifion was given againlt the two moil 
 powerful parties ; though 1 wondered but little at this, 
 becaufe I had before heard much of the impartiality of 
 the law proceedings in England, and was prepared to fee 
 inftances of that kind. But what I was much iurprifed at, 
 was, that no body appeared to be in the leafc fo, not even 
 at the ftridlnefs with which the ordinary courfe of the law 
 had, particularly in the former cafe, been adherted to, 
 and that thofe proceedings which I was difpofed to con- 
 fider as great inftances of juftice, to the production of 
 which fome circumitances peculiar to the times, at lean: 
 fpme uncommon virtue of fpirit on the part of the Judges, 
 mufl have more or lefs co-operated, were looked upon by 
 all thofe whom I heard fpeak about it, as being nothing 
 more than the common and expected courfe of thing-. 
 This circumftance became a ftrong inducement to me to 
 enquire into the nature of a Government by which fuel* 
 Cflfctts were produced.
 
 37* THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Indeed to fuch a degree of impartiality 
 has the adminiftration of public Juftice been 
 brought in England, that it is faying nothing 
 beyond the exadt truth, to affirm that any 
 violation of the laws, though perpetrated by 
 Men of the moil extenfive influence, nay, 
 though committed by the fpecial direction of 
 the very firft Servants of the Crown, will be 
 publicly and completely redreffed. And the 
 very loweft of fubjedts will obtain fuch re- 
 drefs, if he has but fpirit enough to ftand 
 forth, and appeal to the laws of his Coun- 
 try. Mod extraordinary circumftances thefe ! 
 which thofe who know the difficulty that 
 there is in eftablifhing juft laws among Man- 
 kind, and in providing afterwards for their 
 due execution, only find credible becaufe they 
 are matters of fad:, and can begiri to ac- 
 count for, only when they look up to the con- 
 ftitution of the Government itfelf; that is to 
 fay, when they confider the circumftances in 
 which the Executive Power, or the Crown, 
 is placed in relation to the two Bodies that 
 
 concur with it to form the Legiflature, the 
 
 circumftances in which thofe two Aifemblies 
 are placed in relation to the Crown, and to 
 each other, and the fituation in which all
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 379 
 
 the Three find themfelves with refpedt to the 
 whole Body of the People (a). 
 
 (a) The affertion above made with refpeft to the im- 
 partiality with which Juftice is, in all cafes, administered 
 in England, not being of a nature to be proved by alledg- 
 ing fingle fa&s, I have entered into no particulars on that 
 account. However, I have fubjomed here two cafes 
 which, I think, cannot but appear remarkable to the Rea- 
 der. 
 
 The firft is the cafe of the p.ofecution commenced in 
 the year 1763, by fome Journeymen Printers, againft the 
 King's Meffengers, for apprehending and imprifoning them 
 for a fhort time, by vntue of a Ge?ieral Warrant from the 
 Secretaries of State ; and that which was afterwards car- 
 ried on by another private individual, againft one of the 
 Secretaries themfelves. In thefe actions, all the or- 
 dinary forms of proceeding ufed in cafes of adlions be- 
 tween private Subjects, were ftrifUy adhered to ; and 
 both the Secretary of State, and the Meffengers, were, in 
 the end, condemned. Yet, which it is proper the Reader 
 fhould obferve, from all the circumftances that accompa- 
 nied this affair, it is difficult to propofe a cafe in which 
 Minifters could, of themfelves, be under greater tempta- 
 tions to exert an undue influence to hinder the ordinary 
 courfe of Juftice. Nor were the acts for which thofe 
 Minifters were condemned, Acts of evident oppreffion, 
 which nobody could be found to juftify. They had done 
 nothing but follow a practice of which they found fe- 
 veral precedents eftablifhed in their Offices ; and their 
 cafe, if I am well informed, was fuch that moll indi- 
 viduals, under fimilar circumftances, would have thought 
 themfelves authorifed to have adted as they had done.
 
 tfo T^E CONSTITUTION 
 
 In fine, a very remarkable circumftance ii* 
 the Englifh Government (and which alone 
 evinces fomething peculiar and excellent in its 
 Nature), is that fpirit of extreme mildnefs with 
 which Juftice, in criminal cafes, is admin iftered 
 jn England ; a point with regard to which 
 England differs from all other Countries in the 
 World. 
 
 The fecond cafe I propofe to relate, affords a lingular 
 jnftance of the confidence with which ail Subjects in Eng- 
 land claim what thev think their juft rights, and of the 
 certainty with which the remedies of the law are in all 
 cafes open to them. The fact I mean, is the Arreft ex- 
 ecuted in the reign of Queen Anne, in the year r7oS, on 
 the perfon of the Ruffian Ambaffador, by taking him out 
 of his Coach for the fum of fifty pounds And the con- 
 feqnence that followed this fact are Hill n ore remarkable. 
 The Czar highly refented this affront, and demanded that 
 the Sheriff of Middlefex, and all others concerned in the 
 Arreft, fhould be punifhed with inftant death. " But 
 " the Queen," (to the amazement of that defpotic Court, 
 fays Juftice Blackllone, from whom J borrow this fact) 
 I'' the Queen directed the Secretary of State to inform 
 " him that fhe could inflict no puniihmenc upon any, 
 " the meaneft of Her Subjects, unlefs warranted by 
 the law of the land." An Act was afterwards paffed 
 to free from arrefts the perfens of foreign Minifters, and 
 fuch of their fervants as they have delivered a lift of, to 
 the Secretary of State. A copy of this Act elegantly 
 engroffed and illuminated, continues Judge Blackftone, 
 was fent to Mofcow, and an Ambaffador extraordinary 
 commiffioned to deliver it.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 3S1 
 
 When we confider the punifhments in ufe 
 in the other States in Europe, we wonder how 
 Men can be broup-ht to treat their fellow-crea- 
 tures with fo much cruelty ; and the bare con- 
 fideration of thofe punifhments would fuffici- 
 ently convince us (fuppofing we did not know 
 the fact from other circumftances) that the Men 
 in thofe States who frame the laws, and prefide 
 Over their execution, have little apprehenfion 
 that either they, or their friends, will ever fail 
 viftims to thofe laws which they thus ralhly 
 eftablifh. 
 
 In the Roman Republic, circumftances of 
 the fame nature with thofe ju ft mentioned, were 
 alio productive of the greateft defects in the 
 kind of criminal Juftice which took place in 
 it. That clafs of Citizens who were at the 
 head of the Republic, and who knew how 
 mutually to exempt each other from the^pera- 
 tion of any too fevere lows or practice, not only 
 allowed themfelves great liberties, as we have 
 feen, in difpofing of the lives of the inferior 
 Citizens, but had alfo introduced into the ex- 
 ercife of the illegal powers they aiTumed to 
 themfelves in that relpect, a great degree of 
 cruelty (a). 
 
 [a) The common manner in which tb.* Senate or- 
 dered Ciuzens to be put to death, was by throwing 
 
 o 
 

 
 382 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Nor were things more happily conducted in 
 the Grecian Republics. From their Democra- 
 tical nature, and the frequent Revolutions to 
 which they were fubject, we naturally expect to 
 fee that authority to have been ufed with mild- 
 nefs, which thofe who enjoyed it mufl have 
 known to have been but precarious ; yet, fuch 
 were the effects of the violence attending 
 thofe very Revolutions, that a fpirit both of 
 great irregularity and cruelty had taken place 
 among the Greeks, in the exercife of the power 
 of inflicting punifhments. The very harfh laws 
 of Draco are well known, of which it was 
 faid that they were not written with ink, but 
 with blood. The fevere laws of the Twelve 
 Tables among the Romans, were in great part 
 brought over from Greece. And it was an opi- 
 nion commonly received in Rome, that the 
 cruelties practifed by the Magiftrates on the 
 Citizens, were only imitations of the exam- 
 ples which the Greeks had given them (a), 
 
 them head-long from the top of the Tarpeian Rock. The 
 Confuls, or other particular Magiftrates, fometimes caufed 
 Citizens to expire upon a crofs; or, which was a much 
 more common cafe, ordered them to be beaten to death, 
 with their heads fattened between the two branches of a 
 fork : which they called cer<uiccm furca inferere. 
 
 [a) Caefar exprefsly reproaches the Greeks with this 
 fail in his fpeech in favour of the accomplices of
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 383 
 
 In fine, the ufe of Torture, that method of 
 adminiftering Juftice in which folly may be faid 
 to be added to cruelty, had been adopted by the 
 Greeks, in confequence of the fame caufes which 
 had concurred to produce the irregularity of 
 their criminal Juftice. And the fame practice 
 continues, in thefe days, to prevail on the con- 
 tinent of Europe, in confequence of that gene- 
 ral arrangement of things which creates there 
 fuch a carelefihefs about remedying the abufes 
 of public Authority. 
 
 But the nature of that fame Government 
 which has procured to the People of England 
 all the advantages we have before defcribed, 
 has, with ftill more reafon, freed them from 
 the molt oppreffive abufes, which prevail in 
 other countries. 
 
 That wantonnefs in difpoiing of the deareft 
 rights of Mankind, thofe infults upon human 
 Nature, of which the frame of the Govern- 
 ments eftabliihed in other States, unavoidably 
 becomes more or lefs productive, are entirely 
 banifhed from a Nation which has the happi- 
 nefs of having its interefts taken care ol 
 by Men who continue to be themfelves ex- 
 
 Cataline, which Salluft has tranfmitted to us Sed eodem 
 illo tempore, Gratia mar em imitati, (Majores noftri) wr- 
 beribus animad'vertebant in tiveis ; de conJemnatis ultimum 
 fufplicium fumptum.
 
 3H THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 pofed to the preflure of thofe laws which the/ 
 concur in making, arid of every tyrannic prac* 
 tice which they fuffer to be introduced, by 
 Men whom the advantages which they pofTefs 
 above the reft of the People, render only more 
 expoied to the abufes they are appointed to 
 prevent, only more alive to the dangers againfl 
 which it is their duty to defend the Commu- 
 nity (a). 
 
 Hence we fee that the ufe of Torture has, 
 from the earlier! times, been utterly unknown in 
 England. And all attempts to introduce it, 
 whatever might be the power of thofe who. 
 made them, or the circumfiances in which they 
 renewed their endeavours, have been ilrenuoufly 
 oppofed and defeated (b). 
 
 {a) Hiftorians take notice that the Commons, in th'c : 
 reign of Charles II. made hafte to procure the abolition of 
 the old Statute, De Ha:retico comburendo, (For burning He- 
 retics) as foon as it became to be publicly known that the 
 prefumptive Heir to the Crown was a Roman Catholic. 
 Perhaps they would not have been fo diligent and eameft, 
 if they had not been fully convinced that a Member of 
 the Houfe of Commons, or his friends, may be brought 
 to trial as eafily as any other individuals among the people, 
 fo long as an exprefs and written law may be produced 
 againft them. 
 
 [b] The Reader may on this fubjecT; fee again the 
 Note in page 1S1 of this Work, where the oppofition 
 is mentioned, that was mace to the Earl of Suffolk, 
 and the Duke of Exeter, when they attempted to in- 
 troduce the practice of Torture ; this even was erne
 
 OF ENGLAND. 3$$ 
 
 From the fame caufe alfo arofe that remark- 
 able forbearance of the Engliih Laws, to life any 
 cruel feverity in the punifhments which expe- 
 rience fliewed it was neceffary for the preserva- 
 tion of Society to eftablifh : and the utmoft 
 vengeance of thole laws, even againft the moll 
 enormous Offenders, never extends beyond the 
 fimple deprivation of life (a) 
 
 Nay, fo anxious has the Englifh Legis- 
 lature been to eftablifh mercy, even to con- 
 victed Offenders, as a fundamental principle of 
 the Government of England, that they made 
 
 of the caufes for which the latter was afterward impeach- 
 ed The Reader is alfo referred to the Note following 
 that which has juft been quoted, in which the folemn de- 
 claration is related, that was given by the Judges againft 
 the practice of Torture, in the cafe of Felton, who had 
 affaffinated the Duke of Buckingham. 
 
 (<*) A very fingular inftance occurs in the Hiftory of the 
 year 1605, of the care of the Engliih Legislature not to 
 fuffer precedents of cruel practices to be introduced. Dur- 
 ing the time that thofe concerned in the Gun-powder 
 plot were under fentence of death, a motion was made 
 in the Houfe of Commons to petition the King, that the 
 execution might be ftaid, in order to confider of fome ex- 
 traordinary punifhment to be inflicted upon them : but 
 this motion was rejected. A propofal of the fame kind 
 was alfo made in the Houfe of Lords, where it was 
 dropped See the Parliamentary Hiftory of England, vol, 
 v, anno 1605. 
 
 Cc
 
 586 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 it an exprefs article of that great public Compact 
 which was framed at the important aera of. the 
 Revolution, that " no cruel and unufual pu- 
 6C nifhments mould be ufed (#)." They even 
 endeavoured, by adding a claufe for that purpofe 
 to the Oath which Kings were thenceforward to 
 take at their Coronation, as it were to render it 
 an everlafling obligation of Englifh Kings, to 
 make Jufticeto be " executed with mercy ()" 
 
 () See the Bill of Rights, Art. x. " Exceffive bail 
 ought not to be required, nor exceffive fines impofed ; nor 
 cruel and unafaal punishments inflifled.'" 
 
 {b) Thofe fame difpofitions of the Englifh Legiflature, 
 which have led them to take fuch precautions in favour 
 even of convicted" offenders, have ftill more engaged them 
 to make provifions in favour of fach perfons as are only 
 fufpefted and accufed of having committed offences of any 
 kind. Hence the zeal with which they have availed 
 themfelves of every important occafion, fuch for inftance 
 as that of the Revolution, to procure new confirmations 
 to be given to the institution of the Trial by Jury, to the 
 laws on imprisonments, and in general to that fyftem of 
 criminal Jurifprudence of which a defcription has been 
 given in the firft part of this Work, to which I refer the- 
 Header,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 3 87 
 
 CHAP. XVII. 
 
 A more Inward View of the Englijlo Government 
 than has hitherto been offered to the Reader in 
 the courfe of this Work.- Very effential differences 
 between the Englijh Monarchy , as a Monarchy, 
 and all thofe with which we are acquainted* 
 
 TH E Doctrine conftantly maintained in 
 this Work, and which has, I think, 
 been fufficiently fupported by fad:s and com- 
 panions drawn from the Hiftory of other Coun- 
 tries, is that the remarkable liberty enjoyed 
 by the Englifh Nation, is effentially owing to 
 the impoflibility under which their Leaders, or 
 in general all Men -of power among them, 
 are placed, of invading and transferring to 
 themfelves any branch of the Governing Ex- 
 ecutive authority ; which authority is exclu- 
 fively vefted, and firmly fecured, in the Crown. 
 Hence the anxious care with which thofe Men 
 continue to watch the exercife of that autho- 
 rity. Hence their perfeverance in obferving 
 every kind of engagement which themfelves 
 may have entered into with the reft of the 
 People. 
 
 But here a confederation of a mofl impor- 
 tant kind prefents itfelf. How comes the 
 
 C c 2
 
 388 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Crown in England, thus conftantly to prefervc 
 to itfelf (as we fee it does) the Executive au- 
 thority in the State, and moreover to preferve it 
 fo completely as to infpire the great Men in the 
 Nation with that condudt fo advantageous to 
 public Liberty, which has juft been mentioned ? 
 All thefe are effects which we do not find, upon 
 examination, that the power of Crowns has 
 hitherto been able to produce in other Coun- 
 tries. 
 
 In all States of a Monarchical form, we indeed 
 fee that thofe Men whom their rank and wealth, 
 or their perfonal power of any kind, have raifed 
 above the reft of the People, have formed com- 
 binations among themfelves to oppofe the power 
 of the Monarch. But their views, we muft 
 obferve, in forming thefe combinations, were 
 not by any means to fet general and impar- 
 tial limitations on the Sovereign authority. 
 They endeavoured to render themfelves en- 
 tirely independent of that authority ; or even 
 utterly to annihilate it, according to circum- 
 ftances. 
 
 Thus we fee that in all the States of ancient 
 Greece, the Kings were at laft deftroyed and 
 exterminated. The fame event happened in 
 Italy, where in remote times there exifted 
 for a while feveral kingdoms, as we learn 
 both from the ancient Hiftorians and the
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 38$ 
 
 Poets. And in Rome, we even know the man- 
 ner and circumftances in which fuch a revolution 
 was brought about, 
 
 In more modern times, we fee the numerous 
 Monarchical Sovereignties which had beenraifed 
 in Italy on the ruins of the Roman Empire, to 
 have been fucceflively deftroyed by powerful 
 factions ; and events of much the fame nature 
 have at different times taken place in the King- 
 doms eftablifhed in the other parts of Europe. 
 
 In Sweden, Denmark, and Poland, for in- 
 ftance, we find that the Nobles have com- 
 monly reduced their Sovereigns to the con- 
 dition of fimple Prefidents over their AfTem- 
 blies, of mere oflenfible Heads of the Govern- 
 ment. 
 
 In Germany and in France, Countries where 
 the Monarchs being pofTefTed of considerable 
 demefnes, were better able to maintain their 
 independence than the Princes juft mentioned, 
 the Nobles waged war againft them, fometimes 
 fingly and fometimes jointly ; and events 
 fimilar to thefe have fucceflively happened in 
 Scotland, Spain, and the modern Kingdoms 
 of Italy. 
 
 In fine, it has only been the means qf {landing 
 armed forces that the Sovereigns of moft of the
 
 39 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the Kingdoms we have mentioned, have been 
 able in a courfe of time to afTert the prerogatives 
 of their Crown. And it is only by continuing 
 to keep up fuch forces, that, like the Eaftcrn 
 Monarchs, and indeed like all the Monarchs that 
 ever exifted, they continue to be able to iupport 
 their authority. 
 
 How therefore can the Crown cf England, 
 without the afliftance of -any armed force, main- 
 tain, as it does, its numerous prerogatives ? 
 How can it, under fuch circumftances, preferve 
 to itfelf the whole Executive power in the 
 State ? For here we muft obferve, the Crown 
 in England does not derive any fupport from 
 what regular forces it has at its difpofal ; 
 and if we doubted this fact, we need only look 
 to the aftonifhing fubordination in which the 
 military is kept to the civil power, to become 
 convinced that an Englifh King is not in- 
 debted to his army for the prefer vation of his, 
 authority (a). 
 
 If we could fuppofe that the armies of the 
 Kings of Spain or of France, for inftance 3 
 were, through feme very extraordinary circum- 
 ftance, all to vanifh in one night, the power of 
 thofe Sovereigns, v,;e r muft not doubt, would, 
 ere fix months, be reduced to a mere fhadow. 
 
 {a) Henry VIII. the molt abfclute Prince, perhaps, 
 who ev-ji- fat upon a Throne, kept no iianuing army.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 39 1 
 
 They would immediately behold their prero- 
 gatives, however formidable they may be at 
 prefent, invaded and difmembered (a) : and 
 fuppofmg that regular Governments continued 
 to exift, they would be reduced to have little 
 more influence in them than the Doges of 
 Venice, or of Genoa, poffefs in the Governments 
 of thofe Republics (b). 
 
 How, therefore, to repeat the queftion once 
 more, which is one of the mofl interefting that 
 can occur in politics, how can the Crown in 
 England, without the affiftance of any armed 
 force, avoid thofe dangers to which all other 
 Sovereigns are expofed ? 
 
 How can it, without any fuch force, accomplifh 
 even incomparably greater works than thofe 
 Sovereigns, with their powerful armies, are, 
 we find, in a condition to perform ? How can 
 it bear that univerfal effort (unknown in other 
 Monarchies) which, we have feen, is continually 
 and openly exerted againft it ? How can it even 
 continue to refill: it fo powerfully as to preclude 
 all individuals whatever, from ever entertaining 
 any views befides thofe of fetting juft and ge- 
 
 (a) As was the cafe in the feveral Kingdoms into which 
 the Spanifh Monarchy was formerly divided ; and, in not 
 very remote times, in France itfelf. 
 
 (b) Or than the Kings of Sweden were allowed to enjoy, 
 before the laft Revolution in that Country. 
 
 C c 4
 
 392 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 neral limitations to the exercife of its authority > 
 How can it enforce the laws upon all Subjects, 
 indiscriminately, without injury or danger to it- 
 felf ? How can it, in fine, imprefs the minds 
 of all the great Men in the State with fo lafting 
 a jealoufy of its power, as to necefiuate them, 
 even in the exercife of their undoubted rights 
 and privileges, to continue to court and defervc 
 the affection of the reft of the People ? 
 
 Thofe great Men, I fhall anfwer, who even 
 in quiet times prove fo formidable to other 
 Monarchs, are in England divided into two 
 Affemblies ; and fuch, it is neceffary to add, 
 are the principles upon which this divifion is 
 made, that from it refults, as a neceffary con- 
 fequence, the folidity and indivifibility of the 
 power of the Crown (a). 
 
 The Reader may perceive that I have led 
 him, in the courfe of this Work, much be- 
 yond the line within which Writers on the 
 fubjeft of Government have confined them- 
 felves, or rather, that I have followed a tradt 
 entirely different from that which thofe Wri- 
 ters have purfued, But as the obfervation juft 
 made on the liability of the power of the Crown 
 in England, and the caufe of it, is new in its 
 
 (a) I have not flattered myfelf, in writing this Chapter 
 that it would be perfectly underwood, nor is it defigned 
 for the generality of readers.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 393 
 
 kind, fo do the principles from which its truth 
 is to be demonftrated, totally differ from what 
 is commonly looked upon as the foundation 
 of the fcience of Politics. To lay thefe prin- 
 ciples here before the Reader, in a manner 
 completely fatisfadtory to him, would lead us 
 into philofophical difcufilons on what really 
 conftitues the ban's of Governments and Power 
 amongft Mankind, both extremely long, and 
 in a great meafure foreign to the fubject of 
 this book. I lhall therefore content myfelf 
 with proving the above obfervations by facts ; 
 which is more, after all, than political Wri- 
 ters ufually undertake to do with regard to 
 their fpeculations. 
 
 As I chiefly propofed to mew how the ex- 
 tensive liberty the Englifh enjoy, is the refult 
 of the peculiar frame of their Government, 
 and occafionally to compare the fame with 
 the Republican form, I even had at firft in- 
 tended to confine myfelf to that circumftance, 
 which both conftitutes the efTential difference 
 between thofe two forms of Government, and 
 is the immediate caufe of Englifh liberty; 
 I mean the having placed all the executive au- 
 thority in the State out of the hands of thofe 
 in whom the People trufl. With regard to 
 the remote caufe of that fame liberty, that is 
 to fay the {lability of the power of the Crown,
 
 394 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 this fingular folidity without the affiflance of 
 any armed force, by which this executive 
 authority is fo fecured, I fhould perhaps have 
 been filcnt, had I not found it abfolutely ne- 
 ceffary to mention the fact in this place, in 
 order to obviate the objections which the 
 more reflecting part of Readers might other- 
 wife have made, both to feveral of the ob- 
 fervations before offered to them, and to a 
 few others which are foon to follow. 
 
 Befides, I {hall confefs here, I have been 
 feveral times under apprehenfions, in the courfe 
 of this Work, left the generality of Readers, 
 milled by the fimilarity of names, ihould put 
 too extenfive a conftruction upon what I faid 
 with regaFd to the ufefulnefs of the power 
 of the Crown in England ; left they Ihould 
 think, for inftance, that I attributed the 
 fupcrior advantages of the Englifh mode of 
 Government over the Republican form, merely 
 to its approaching nearer to the nature of the 
 Monarchies eftablimed in the other parts of 
 Europe, and that I looked upon every kind 
 pf Monarchy, as being in itfelf preferable 
 to a Republican Government : an opinion, 
 which I do not by any means or in any degree 
 entertain ; I have too much affection, or if 
 you pleafe, prepoiTeftion, in favour of that 
 form of Government under which I was born ; 
 and as I am fenfiblc of its defects^ fo do I
 
 OFENGLAND. 395 
 
 know how to fet a value upon the advantages 
 by which it compenfates for them. 
 
 I therefore have, as it were, made hafte to 
 avail myfelf of the firft opportunity of ex- 
 plaining my meaning on this fubjedt, of in- 
 dicating that the power of the Crown in Eng- 
 land ftands upon foundations entirely dif- 
 ferent from thofe on which the fame Power 
 refts in other Countries, and of engaging the 
 Reader to obferve (which for the prefent will 
 fuffice) that as the Englifh Monarchy differs, 
 in its nature and main foundations, from every 
 other, fo all that is faid here of its advantages 
 is peculiar and confined to it. 
 
 But, to come to the proofs (derived from 
 fats) of the folidity accruing to the power of 
 the Crown in England, from the co~exiftence of 
 the two AfTemblies which concur to form the 
 Englifh Parliament, I fhall firft point out to the 
 Reader feveral open a&s of thefe two Houfes, 
 by which they have by turns effectually de- 
 feated the attacks of each other upon its pre- 
 rogative. 
 
 Without looking farther back for examples 
 than the reign of Charles the Second, we fee 
 that the Houfe of Commons had, in that 
 reign, begun to adopt the method of adding 
 (or tacking, as it is commonly exprefTed) 
 
 7
 
 396 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fuch bills as they wanted more particularly 
 to have paffed, to their money bills. This 
 forcible ufe they made of their undoubted 
 privilege of granting money, if fuffered to have 
 grown into common practice, would have to- 
 tally deftroyed the ^equilibrium : that ought to 
 fubfift between them and the Crown. But the 
 Lords took upon themfelves the tafk of main- 
 taining that asquilibrium they complained 
 with great warmth of the feveral precedents 
 that were made by the Commons, of the prac- 
 tice we mention : they infilled that Bills 
 ihould be framed " in the old and decent zvay 
 " of Parliament " and at laft have made it 
 a Handing order of their Houfe, to reject upon 
 the fight of them, all bills that are tacked to 
 money bills. 
 
 Again, about the thirty-firft year of the 
 fame reign, a flrong party prevailed in the 
 Houfe of Commons ; and their efforts were 
 not entirely confined, if we may credit the 
 Hiftorians of thofe times, to ferving their 
 Conflituents faithfully, and providing for the 
 welfare of the State. Among other bills which 
 they propofed in their Houfe, they carried one 
 to exclude from the Crown the immediate 
 Heir to it; an affair this, of a very high 
 nature, and with regard to which it may well 
 be queflioned whether the legislative Affem-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 397 
 
 blies have a right to form a refolution, with- 
 out the exprefs and declared concurrence of 
 the body of the People. But both the Crown 
 and the Nation were delivered from the danger 
 of eftablifhing fuch a precedent, by the inter- 
 pofition of the Lords, who threw out the bill 
 on the firft reading. 
 
 In the reign of King William the Third, a 
 few years after the Revolution, attacks were 
 made upon the Crown from another quarter. 
 A ftrong party was formed in the Houfe of 
 Lords ; and, as we may fee in Bifhop Burnet's 
 Hiftory of his Own Times, they entertain- 
 ed very deep defigns. One of their views, 
 among others, was to abridge the prerogative 
 of the Crown of calling Parliaments, and 
 judging of the proper times of doing it (a). 
 They accordingly framed and carried in their 
 Houfe a bill for afcertaining the fitting of 
 
 (a) They, befides, propofed to have all money bills 
 flopped in their Houfe, till they had procured the right 
 of taxing, themfelves, their own eftates ; and have 
 a Committee of Lords, and a certain number of the 
 Commons, appointed to confer together concerning the 
 State of the Nation ; ' which Commitee (fays Bilhop 
 
 * Burnet) would foon have grown to have been a Council 
 
 * of State, that would have brought all affairs under their 
 ' infpeftion, and never had been propofed but when the 
 
 * Nation was ready to break into civil wars/ See 
 Burnet's Hiftory, anno 1693,
 
 39S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Parliament every year : but the bill, after it 
 had pafTed in their Houfe, was rejected by 
 the Commons (a). 
 
 Again, we find, a little after the acceffion 
 of King George the Firft, an attempt was 
 alfo made by a party in the Houfe of Lords, 
 to wreft from the Crown a prerogative which 
 is one of its finefl flowers ; and is, befides, 
 the only check it has on the dangerous views 
 which that Houfe (which may flop both money 
 bills and all other bills) might be brought 
 to entertain ; I mean the right of adding new 
 members to it, and judging of the times when 
 it may be neceffary to do fo. A bill was ac- 
 cordingly prefented, and carried, in the 
 Houfe of Lords, for limiting the members 
 of that Houfe to a fixed number, beyond 
 which it fhould not be increafed ; but after 
 great pains taken to infure the fuccefs of this 
 bill, it was at laft rejected by the Houfe of 
 Commons. 
 
 In fine, the feveral attempts which a ma- 
 jority in the Lloufe of Commons have in their 
 turn made to reftrain, farther than it now is, 
 the influence of the Crown arifng from the 
 difh'ibution of preferments and other advan- 
 tages, have been checked by the Houfe of 
 
 [a) Nov. 2S, 1693.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 o 
 
 99 
 
 Lords; and all place-bills have, from the 
 
 beginning of this Century, conftantly mifcarried 
 in that Houfe. 
 
 Nor have thefe two powerful Affemblies only 
 fucceeded in thus warding off the open attacks 
 of each other, on the power of the Crown. Their 
 co-exiflence, and the principles upon which 
 they are feverally framed, have been productive 
 of another effedt much more extenfive, though 
 at firft lefs attended to, I mean the preventing 
 even the making of fuch attacks ; and in times 
 too, when the Crown was of itfelf incapable 
 of defending its authority : the views of each of 
 thefe two Houfes, deftroying, upon thefe occa- 
 lions, the oppofite views of the other, like thofe 
 pofitive and negative equal quantities (if I may 
 be allowed the comparifon) which deflroy each 
 other on the oppofite fides of an equation. 
 
 Of this we have feveral remarkable exam- 
 ples ; as for inftance, when the Sovereign has 
 been a minor. If we examine the Hiftory of 
 other Nations, efpocially before the invention 
 of {landing armies, we mail find that the 
 event we mentioned never failed to be attended 
 with open invafions of the Royal authority, or 
 even fometimes with complete and fettled divi- 
 sions of it. In England, on the contrary, whe- 
 ther we look at the reign of Richard II. or that 
 of Henry VI. or of Edward VI, we mail fee
 
 4 oo THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 that the Royal authority has been quietly exer- 
 cifed by the Councils that were appointed 
 to aflift thofe Princes ; and when they came of 
 age, the fame has been delivered over to them 
 undiminiflied. 
 
 But nothing fo remarkable can be alledged 
 on this fubject, as the manner in which thefe 
 two Houfes have acted upon thofe occalions 
 when the Grown being without any prefent 
 porTeflbr, they had it in their power, both to 
 fettle it on what Perfon they pleafed, and to 
 divide and diftribute its effectual prerogatives, 
 in what manner, and to what fet of Men, 
 they might think proper. Circumflances like 
 thofe we mention, have never failed in other 
 Kingdoms, to bring on a diviflon of the effec- 
 tual authority of the Crown, or even of the 
 State itfelf. In Sweden, for inftance (to fpeak 
 of that kingdom which has borne the greateft 
 outward refemblance to that of England), when 
 Queen Chriftina was put under a neceffity of 
 abdicating the Crown, and it was transferred to 
 the Prince who flood next to her in the line of 
 Succeffion, the Executive authority in the State 
 was immediately divided, and either diftributed 
 among the Nobles, or afligned to the Senate, 
 into which the Nobles alone could be admitted ; 
 and the new King was only to be a Preiident 
 over ic. $
 
 OF ENGLAND. 401 
 
 After the death of Charles the Twelfth, 
 who died without male heirs, the difpofal of 
 the Crown (the power of which Charles the 
 Eleventh had found means to render again 
 abfolute) returned to the States, and was fettled 
 on the Prineefs Ulrica, and the Prince her 
 hufband. But the Senate, at the fame time 
 it thus fettled the poffeffion of the Crown, again 
 affumed to itfelf the effectual authority which 
 had formerly belonged to it. The privilege of 
 affembling the States was vefted in that Body. 
 They alfo fecured to themfelves the power of 
 making war and peace, and treaties with fo- 
 reign powers, the difpofal of places, the 
 command of the army and of the fleet, 
 and the adminiftration of the public revenue. 
 Their number was to confiftof fixteen Members. 
 The majority of votes was to be decifive upori 
 every occafion. The only privilege of the new 
 King, was to have his vote reckoned for 
 two : and if at any time he mould refufe 
 to attend their meetings, the bufinefs was never- 
 thelefs to be done as effectually and definitively 
 without him (a). 
 
 (*) The Senate had procured a Seal to be made, to be 
 affixed to their official refolutions, in cafe the King fhould 
 refufe to lend his own. The reader will find a few more 
 particulars concerning the former government of Sweden- 
 in the nineteenth Chapter. 
 
 Dd
 
 4 02 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 But in England, the revolution of the year 
 1689 was terminated in a manner totally dif- 
 
 Regnlations of a fimilar nature had been made in 
 Denmark, and continued to fubfitt, with fome variations, 
 till the Revolution which, in the lad Century, placed the 
 whole power in the State in the hands of the Crown, 
 without controul. The different Kingdoms into which 
 Spain was formerly divided, were governed in much the 
 fame manner. 
 
 And in Scotland, that Seat of anarchy and ariftocra- 
 tical feuds, all the great offices in the State were not only 
 taken from the Crown ; but they were moreover made he- 
 reditary in the principal families of the Body of the No- 
 bles : fuch were the offices of High Admiral, High 
 Stewart, High Conftable, Great Chamberlain, and Juflice 
 General; this latter office implied powers analogous to 
 thofe of the Lord Chancellor, and the Lord Chief Juftici j 
 of the King's Bench, united. 
 
 The King's minority, or perfonal weaknefs, or in ge- 
 neral the difficulties in which the State might be involved. 
 were circumftances of which the Scotch Leaders never 
 failed to avail thcmfelves for invading the governing au- 
 thority ; a remarkable inftance of the claims they were 
 ufed to fet forth on thofe occafions, occurs in a Bill that 
 was framed in the year 1705, for fettling the Succeffion to 
 the Crown, after the demife of the Queen, under the title 
 of An J SI for the Security of the Kingdom* 
 
 The Scotch Parliament was to fit by its own authority, 
 every year, on the firft day of November, and adjourn 
 themfelves as they fliould think proper. 
 
 The king was to give his afient to all laws agreed to, 
 and offered by, the Ellates; or commiffion proper officer? 
 for doing the fame. 
 
 A Committee of one and thirty Members, chofen 
 by the Parliament, were to be called the King's Council,
 
 OF ENGLAND* 403 
 
 ferenC Thofe who at that interefting epoch 
 had the guardianfhip of the Crown, thofe 
 in whofe hands it lay vacant, did not manifeft 
 1b much as a thought to fplit and parcel out 
 its prerogative. They tendered it to a fingle 
 indivifible poiTeflbr, impelled as it were by 
 ibme fecret power that was, unfeen, operating 
 upon them without any falvo, without any 
 article to eftablifh the greatnefs of themfelves, 
 or of their families. It is true, thofe prero- 
 gatives deftrucYive of public liberty which the 
 late King had affumed, were retrenched from 
 the Crown ; and thus far the two Houfes 
 agreed. But as to any attempt to transfer to 
 other hands any part of the authority of the 
 Crown, no propofal was even made about it. 
 Thofe branches of prerogative which were 
 taken from the kingly office, were annihilated 
 and made to ceafe to exift in the State ; and all 
 the Executive authority that was thought ne- 
 ceffary to be continued in the Government, was, 
 as before, left undivided in the Crown. 
 
 and govern, during the recefs, being accountable to the 
 Parliament. 
 
 The King net to make any foreign Treaty without the 
 confent of Parliament. 
 
 All places and offices, both civil and military, and ail 
 penflons formerly given by the King, {hall ever after bs 
 Kn-en by Parliament. Sec Parliamentary Debates. A, 1705, 
 
 Dd 2
 
 404 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 In the very fame manner was the whole au- 
 thority of the Crown transferred afterwards 
 to the Princefs who fucceeded King William 
 the Third, and who had no other claim to it 
 but what was conferred on her by the Par- 
 liament. And in the fame manner again was 
 it fettled, a long time beforehand, on the Prin- 
 ces of Hanover who have fince fucceeded 
 her (a). 
 
 Nay, one more extraordinary fadt, and to 
 which I defire the Reader to give attention 
 
 (a) It may not be improper to obferve here, as a far- 
 ther proof of the indivilibility of the power of the Crown 
 (which has been above faid to refult from the peculiar 
 frame of the Englifh Government) that no part of the 
 Executive authority of the King is vefted in his Privy 
 Council, as we have feen it was in the Senate of Sweden: 
 the whole bufmefs centers in the Sovereign; the votes of 
 the Members are not even counted, if I am well in- 
 formed : and in fact the conftant ft vie of the Law, is the 
 King in Council, and ,not the King and Council. A 
 provifo is indeed fometimes added to feme Bills, that 
 certain acts mentioned in them are to be tranfadled by 
 the King in Council : but this is only a precaution taken 
 in the view- that the moft important affairs of a great Na- 
 tion may be tranfadled with proper fclemnity, and to pre- 
 vent, for inftance, all objections that might, in procefs of 
 time, be drawn from the uncertainty whether the King has 
 affented, or not, to certain particular tranfactions. The 
 King names the Members of the Privy Council : 
 or excludes them, by cr.ufing their names to be (truck 
 out of the Book.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 405 
 
 Notwithstanding all the Revolutions we men- 
 tion, and although Parliament hath fat every 
 year fince the beginning of this century, and 
 though they have conftantly enjoyed the moft 
 unlimited freedom both as to the fubjects and 
 the manner of their deliberations, and num- 
 berlefs propofals have in confequence been 
 made, yet, fuch has been the efficiency of each 
 Houfe, in deflroying, preventing, or qualify- 
 ing, the views of the other, that the Crown 
 has not been obliged during all that time to 
 make ufe, even once, of its negative voice j 
 and the lafl Bill rejected by a king of England, 
 has been that rejected by King William the 
 Third in the year 1692, for Triennial Parlia- 
 ments (a). 
 
 There is another inftance yet more remarkable 
 of this forbearing conduct of the Parliament 
 in regard to the Crown, to whatever open or 
 latent caufe it may be owing, and how little 
 their efpnt de corps in reality leads them, amidfl 
 the apparent heat fometimes of their ftruggles, 
 to invade its governing executive authori- 
 ty ; I mean, the facility with which they 
 have been prevailed upon to give up any ef- 
 fential branch of that authority, even after a 
 
 {'a) He affented a few years afterwards to that Bill., afte: 
 feveral amendments had been made in it. 
 
 D d 3
 
 4 o6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 conjunction of preceding circumftances had 
 caufed them to be actually in poffeffion of it ; 
 a cafe this, however, that has not frequently 
 happened in the Englifh Hiftory. After the 
 Reftoration of Charles the Second, for inftance, 
 we find the Parliament to have of their own ac- 
 cord parted an Act, in the firft year that follow- 
 ed that event, by which they annihilated, at one 
 ftroke, both the independent legislative autho^ 
 rity, and all claims to fuch authority, which 
 they had afiumed during the preceding dis- 
 turbances : by the Stat. 13 Ca. II. c 1. it was 
 forbidden, under the penalty of a premunire 
 (fee p. 97.) to affirm that either of the two 
 Houfes of Parliament, or both jointly, poifefs, 
 without the concurrence of the Kino- the 
 Legislative authority. In the fourth year after 
 the Reftoration, another capital branch of the 
 governing authority of the Crown was alio 
 reftcred to it, without any manner of ftrug- 
 gle : by the Stat. 16 Car. II. c. 1. the A<ft 
 was repealed by which it had been enacted, 
 that in cafe the King Should neglect to call a 
 Parliament once at lead in three years, the 
 Peers lhould iffue the writs for an election ; and 
 that fnould they neglect to iflue the fame, the 
 Conftituents mould of themfelves aiTembl? to 
 elect a Parliament.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 47 
 
 It is here to be obferved, that, in the 
 fame reign we mention, the Parliament paflf- 
 ed the Habeas Corpus Aft, as well as the other 
 Afts that prepared the fame, and in general 
 fhewed a jealoufy in watching over the liberty 
 of the fubjeft, fuperior perhaps to what has 
 taken place at any other period of the Englim 
 Hiflory: this is another ftriking confirmation 
 of what has been remarked in a preceding 
 Chapter, concerning the manner in which 
 public difturbances have always been ter- 
 minated in England. Here we find a feries 
 of Parliaments to have been tenaciously and 
 perfeverantly jealous of thofe kinds of popu- 
 lar univerfal provisions which great Men in 
 other States ever difdained feriouSly to think 
 of, or give a place to, in thofe treaties by 
 which internal peace was reftored to the 
 Nation ; and at the fame time thefe Par- 
 liaments cordially and Sincerely gave up 
 thofe high and fplendid branches of Govern- 
 ing authority, which the Senates or ASTemblies 
 of great Men who furrounded the Monarchs in 
 other limited Monarchies, never ceafed anxiouSly 
 to flrive to aSTume to themfelves, and which 
 the Monarchs, after having loft them, never 
 wei*e able to recover but by military violence 
 aided by furprize, or through National com- 
 
 Dda
 
 4o8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 motions. All thefe are political lingular'^ 
 ties, certainly remarkable enough. It is a 
 circumftance , in no fmall degree conducive 
 to the folidity of the executive authority of the 
 Englifh Crown (which is the fubjed: of this 
 Chapter) that thofe perfons who feem to have 
 it in their power to wreft the fame from it, are, 
 fomehow, prevented from entertaining thoughts 
 of doing fo (#). 
 
 (a) I will mention another inftance of this real difin- 
 tereftednefs of the Parliament in regard to the power of 
 the Crown, nay, of the ilrong bent that prevails in 
 that AfTembly, to make the Crown the general depofi- 
 tory of the executive authority to the Nation ; I mean 
 to fpeak of the manner in which they ufe to provide 
 for the execution of thofe refutations of an a&ive kind 
 they may at times come to: it is always by addreffing 
 the Crown for that purpofe, and defiring it to interfere 
 with its own executive authority. Even, in regard to the 
 printing of their Journals, the Crown is applied to by the 
 Commons, with a promife of making good to it the 
 neceffary expences. Certainly, if there exifted in that 
 Body any latent anxiety, any real ambition (I fpeak 
 here of the general tenor of their conduct) to inveft them- 
 felves with the executive authority in the State, they 
 would not give up the providing by their own authority 
 at leaft for the objeel juft mentioned : it might give them 
 a pretence for having a fet of Officers belonging to them, 
 as well as a Treafury of their own, and in fhort for 
 eftablifhing in their favour fome fort of beginning or 
 precedent: at the fame time that a wifh on their part, 
 to be the publifhers of their own Journals, could not be 
 decently oppefed by the Crown, nor would be likely
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 409 
 
 As another proof of the peculiar folidity.of 
 the power of the Crown, in England, may 
 be mentioned the facility, and fafety to itfelf 
 and to the State, with which it has at all times? 
 been able to deprive any particular Subjects of 
 their different offices, however overgrown, and 
 even dangerous, their private power may feem 
 to be. A very remarkable inftance of this kind 
 occurred when the great Duke of Marlborough 
 was fuddenly removed from all his employments : 
 the following is the account given by Dean 
 Swift, in his " Hiftory of the Four laft Years 
 " of the Reign of Queen Anne." 
 
 to be found fault with by the Public. To fome readers 
 the fat we are fpeaking of may appear trifling ; to me it 
 is not fo: I confefs I never happen to fee a paragraph in 
 the newfpapers, mentioning an addrefs to the Crown for 
 borrowing its executive prerogative in regard to the incon- 
 fiderable objeft here alluded to, without paufing for half 
 a minute on the article. Certainly there muft needs exift 
 caufes of a very peculiar nature which produce in an Af- 
 fembly poueffed of fo much weight, that remarkable free- 
 dom from any ferious ambition to pulh their adrantages 
 farther, which imfpire it with the great political forbear- 
 ance we have mentioned, with fo fincere an indifference in 
 general, in regard to arrogating to themfelves any branch 
 of the executive authority of the Crown : they really 
 feem as if they did not know what to do with it after 
 having acquired it, nor of what kind of fervice it may be 
 to them.
 
 4io THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 " So that the Queen found herfelf under a 
 " neceflity, by removing one perfon from fo 
 te great a truft, to get clear of all her difficul- 
 " ties at once : her Majefty determined upon 
 " the latter expedient, as the ihorter and fafer 
 " courfe; and during the recefs at Chriftmas, 
 " fent the Duke a letter to tell him fhe had no 
 cc farther occafion for his fervice. 
 
 tc There has not perhaps in the prefent age 
 " been a clearer inftance to ihew the inftability 
 " of power, which is not founded on virtue : 
 <c and it may be an inftru&ion to Princes who 
 " are well in the hearts of their People, that 
 " the overgrown power of any particular 
 " perfon, although fupported by exorbitant 
 " wealth, can, by a little refolution, be re- 
 " duced in a moment, without any dangerous 
 tc confequences. This Lord, who was, beyond 
 * c all comparifon, the greateft fubjeel: in Chri- 
 ic ftendom, found his power, credit, and in- 
 " fluence crumble away on a fudden ; and ex- 
 il cept a few friends and followers, the reft 
 (i dropped off in courfe, &c." (B. I. near the 
 end.) 
 
 The eafe with which fuch a Man as the Puke 
 was fuddenly removed, Dean Swift has ex- 
 plained by the neceffary advantages of Princes 
 who pofTefs the affeftion of their People, and
 
 OFENGLAND. 411 
 
 the natural weaknefs of power which is not 
 founded on virtue. However, thefe are very 
 unfatisfadtory explanations. The Hiftory of 
 Europe, in former times, offers us a continued 
 feries of examples to the contrary. We fee in 
 it numberlefs inftances of Princes inceffantly en- 
 gaged in refilling in the field the competition of 
 Subjects inverted with the eminent dignities of 
 the Realm, who were not by any means fnperior 
 to them in point of virtue, or at other times, 
 living in a continued ftate of vaflalage under 
 fome powerful Man whom they durft not refifr, 
 and whofe power, credit, and influence they would 
 have found it far from poffible to reduce in a 
 moment, or crumble on afudden, by the fending of 
 a fingle letter, even though affiiled by a little rc- 
 Jolution, to ufe Dean Swift's expreflions, and 
 without any dangerous confequences. 
 
 Nay, certain Kings, fuch as Henry the 
 Third of France, in regard to the Duke of 
 Guile, and James the Second, of Scotland, 
 in regard to the two Earls of Douglas fuccef- 
 {ively, had at laft recourfe to plot and affafiina- 
 tion; and expedients of a fimilar fudden violent 
 kind, are the fettled methods adopted by the 
 Eaftern monarchs ; nor is it very fure they can 
 always eafily do otherwife (a). 
 
 (a) We might alfo mention here the cafe of the Em. 
 peror Ferdinand II. and the Duke of Walftein, which
 
 4 i2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Even in the prefent'Monarchies of Europe, 
 notwithstanding the awful force by which they 
 are outwardly fupported, a difcarded Minifter 
 is the caufe of more or lefs anxiety to the go- 
 verning Authority ; efpecially if, through the 
 length of time he has been in office, he happens 
 to have acquired a considerable degree of influ- 
 ence. He is generally fentand confined to one 
 of his eftates in the country, which the Crown 
 names to him : he is not allowed to appear at 
 Court, nor even in the Metropolis; much lefs is 
 he fufFered to appeal to the People in loud com- 
 plaints, to make public fpeeches to the great 
 Men in the State, and intrigue among them, 
 and in fhort to vent his refentment by thofe 
 bitter, and fometimes defperate methods, which 
 in the Conftitution of this Country, prove in 
 great meafure harmlefs. 
 
 feems tc have at the time made a g-eat r.oife in the world. 
 The Earls of Douglas were fometimes attended by a 
 retinue of two thoufand horfe. See Dr. Robertfon': 
 Hiftory of Scotland. The Duke of Guile was warred 
 fomc hours before his death, of the danger of trufhng his 
 perfon into the king's prefence or houfe ; he aniwered, 
 
 On n'ofcroit They durfc not. 
 
 If Mary, Queen of Scots, had pollened a power ana- 
 logous to ti at exerted by Queen Anne, lhe might perhaps 
 have avoided ::ng driven into thofe inflances of ill- conduct 
 which were followed by fuch tragical conlequence:.
 
 O F E N G L A N D, 413 
 
 But a Diffolution of the Parliament, that is, 
 the difmiffion of the whole body of the great 
 Men in the Nation, affembled in Legislative ca- 
 pacity, is a circumftance in the Englifti Govern- 
 ment, in a much higher degree remarkable and 
 deferving our notice, than the depriving any fin* 
 gle individual, however powerful, of his pub- 
 lic employments. When we confider in what 
 eafy and complete manner fuch a diffolution is 
 effedted in England, we muft needs become 
 convinced that the power of the Crown bears 
 upon foundations of very uncommon, though. 
 perhaps hidden, ftrength ; efpecially, if we 
 attend to the feveral fadts that take place in 
 other Countries. 
 
 In France, for example, 'we find the Crown, 
 notwithflanding the immenfe outward force by 
 which it is furrounded, to ufe the utmoft cau- 
 tion in its proceedings towards the Parliament 
 of Paris : an Affembly only of a judiciary na- 
 ture, without any Legislative authority or avow- 
 ed claim, and which, in ihort, is very far from 
 having the fame weight in the kingdom of 
 France, as the Engliih Parliament has in Eng- 
 land. The King never repairs to that Affem- 
 bly, to fignify his intentions, or hold a Lit de 
 Jujlice, without the moft over-awing circum- 
 ftances of military apparatus and preparation,
 
 4H THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 constantly choofing to make his appearance 
 among them rather as a military Genera], than 
 as a King. 
 
 And when the late King, having taken a fe- 
 rions alarm at the proceedings of this Parlia- 
 ment, at length refolved upon their difmiflion, 
 he fenced himfelf, as it were, with his army ; 
 and military Meffengers were fent with every 
 circumftance of fecrecy and difpatch, who, at 
 an early part of the day and at the fame hour, 
 furprifed each Member in his own houfe, 
 caufing them feverally to depart for diflant 
 parts of the country which were prefcribed to 
 them, without allowing them time to confider, 
 much lefs to meet, and hold any confutation 
 together. 
 
 But the Perfon who is invefted with the king- 
 ly office, in England, has need of no other wea- 
 pon, no other artillery, than the Civil Infignia 
 of his dignity, to efFed: a diffolution of the 
 Parliament. He fteps into the middle of them, 
 telling them they are diffolved; and they are 
 diffolved : he tells them, they are no longer a 
 Parliament ; and they are no longer fo. Like 
 Popilius's wand (a), a diffolution inftantly puts 
 a flop to their warmeft debates and molt vio- 
 
 [a) He who ftopt the army of King Antiochus.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 415 
 
 lent proceedings. The wonderful words by 
 which it is expreffed have no fooner met their 
 ears, than all their legiflative faculties are be- 
 numbed : though they may Hill be fitting on 
 the fame benches, they look no longer upon 
 themfelves as forming an AfTembly ; they no 
 longer confider each other in the light of Affo- 
 ciates or of Colleagues. As if fome ftrange 
 kind of weapon, or a fudden magical effort, had 
 been exerted in the midft of them, all the bonds 
 of their union are cut off; and they hallen 
 away, without having fo much as the thought 
 of continuing for a fingle minute the duration 
 of their AfTembly (a). 
 
 {a) Nor has London poft-horfes enough to drive them 
 far and near into the Country, in cafe the declaration by 
 which the Parliament is diffblved, alfo mentions the calling 
 of a new one. 
 
 A Diffolution, when proclaimed by a common Crier 
 afiilted by a few Beadles, is attended by the very fame 
 effefts. 
 
 To the account of the expedient ufed by the late King 
 of France, to effect the difmifRon of the Parliament of 
 Paris, we may add the manner in which the Crown of 
 Spain, in a higher degree arbitrary perhaps than chat of 
 France, undertook, fome years ago, to rid itfelf of the 
 religious Society of the Jefuits, whofe political influence 
 and intrigues had grown to give it umbrage. Thev 
 were feized by an armed force, at the fame minute of the 
 fame day, in every Town or Borough of that extenfive
 
 4 i6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 To all thefe obfervations concerning the pe- 
 culiar folidity of the authority of the Crown, 
 in England, I fhall add another that is fupplied 
 by the whole feries of the Englifh Hiftory ; 
 which is, that, though bloody broils and dis- 
 turbances have often taken place in England, 
 and war often made againft the King, yet it has 
 fcarcely ever been done, but by perfons whopofi- 
 tively and exprefsly laid claim to the Crown. 
 Even while Cromwell contended with an armed 
 force againft Charles the Firft, it was, as every 
 one knows who has read that part of the Englifh 
 hiftory, in the King's own name he waged war 
 againft him. 
 
 Monarchy where they had refidence, in order to their be- 
 ing hurried away to fhips that were waiting to carry them 
 into aaother Country : the whole bufinefs being conducted 
 with circumftances of fecrecy, furprize, and of preparation 
 far fuperior to what is related of the moft celebrated con- 
 fpiracies mentioned in Hiftory, 
 
 The Diffolution of the Parliament which Charles the 
 Second had. called at Oxford, is an extremely curious 
 event : a very lively account of it is to be found in Old- 
 mixon's Hiftory of England. 
 
 If certain alterations, however imperceptible they may 
 perhaps be, at firft, to the public eye, ever take place, 
 the period may come at which the Crown will no longer 
 have it in its power to diffolve the Parliament ; that is to 
 fay, a diffolution will no longer be followed by the fam 
 effects that it is at prcfent.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 417 
 
 The fame objection might be exprefled'in a 
 more general manner and with ftrict truth, by 
 faying, that no war has been waged, in Eng- 
 land, againft the governing authority, except 
 upon national grounds ; that is to fay, either 
 when the title to the Crown has been doubtful, 
 or when general complaints, either of a political 
 or religious kind, have ariferi from every part 
 of the Nation : as inftances of fuch complaints 
 may be mentioned thofe that gave rife to 
 tKe war againft King John, which ended in the 
 paffing of the Great Charter, the civil wars 
 in the reign of Charles the Firft, and the 
 Revolution of the year 1689. From the 
 facts juft mentioned it may alfo be obferved as 
 a concluiion, that the Crown cannot depend on 
 the great fecurity we have been defcribing any 
 longer than it continues to fulfil its engage- 
 ments to the Nation, and to refpect thofe laws 
 which form the compact between it and the 
 People. And the imminent dangers, or at leaft 
 the alarms and perplexities, in which the Kings 
 of England have conftantly involved themfelves, 
 whenever they have attempted to ftruo-o-l e 
 againft the general fenfe of the Nation, mani- 
 feftly fhew that all that has been above ob- 
 ferved, concerning the fecurity and remarkable 
 {lability fomehow annexed to their Office, is to 
 
 Ee
 
 4 iS THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 be underftood, not of the capricious power of the 
 Man, but of the lawful authority of the Head 
 of the State (a). 
 
 [a) One more obfervation might be made on the fubjeft ; 
 which is, that, when the kingly dignity has happened in 
 England to be wrefted from the poffeffor, through fome 
 revolution, it has been recovered, or ftruggled for, with 
 more difficulty than in other Countries : in all the other 
 Countries upon earth, a King de jure (by claim) poffeffes 
 advantages in regard tothe King in being, much fuperior 
 to thofe of which the fame circumftance may be produc- 
 tive in England. The power of the other Sovereigns in. 
 the World, is not fo fecurely eflablifhed as that of an Eng- 
 Hih King; but then their character is more indelible; 
 that is to fay, till their Antagonists have fuccceded in 
 Cutting them off and their families, they poffefs in a high 
 degree a power to renew thefe claims, and difturb the 
 State. Thofe family pleas or claims of priority, and in 
 general thofe arguments to which the bulk of Mankind 
 have agreed to allow fo much weight, ceafe almoir. entirely 
 to be of any effect, in England, againft the perfon actually 
 inverted with the kingly office, as foon as the conflitutional 
 parts and fprings have begun to move, and in fhort as 
 foon as the machine of the Government has once begun 
 be in full play. An univerfal national ferment, fimilar tct 
 that which produced the former difturbances,- is the on- 
 ly time of real danger. 
 
 The remarkable degree of internal national quiet, which, 
 for very near a century pair, has followed the Revolution 
 of the year 1689, is a remarkable proof of the truth of the- 
 obfervations above made; nor do I think, that, all circum- 
 ftances being confidered, any other Country can produce 
 the like inftancs.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 4 r 9 
 
 Second Part of the fame Chapter. 
 
 THERE is certainly a very great degree of 
 Angularity in all the circumftances we 
 have been defcribing here : thofe perfons who 
 are acquainted with the hiftory of other Coun- 
 tries, cannot but remark with furprife, that lia- 
 bility of the power of the Englifh Crown, 
 that myfterious folidity, nthat inward binding 
 ftrength with which it is able to carry on with 
 certainty its legal operations > amidft the cla- 
 morous ftruggle and aproar with which it it 
 commonly furrounded, and without the me- 
 dium of any armed threatening force. To 
 give a demonftratiort of the manner in which 
 all thefe things are brought to bear and oper- 
 ated, is not, as I faid before, my defign to 
 attempt here ; the principles from which 
 fuch demonstration is to be derived, fuppofe 
 an enquiry into the nature of Man, and of hu- 
 man affairs, which rather belongs to philofophy 
 (though to a branch hitherto unexplored) than 
 to Politics : at lead fuch an enquiry certainly 
 lies out of the fphere of the common Science of 
 Politics (a). However, I had a very material 
 
 (a) It may, if the reader pleafes, belong to the Science 
 
 of Metapolitics ; in the fame fenfe as we fay Mctaphyfia ; 
 
 that is, the Science of thofe things which lie beyond phyfical, 
 
 or fubltantial, things. A few more word are b^ftowed 
 
 * E e 2
 
 42o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 reaibn in introducing all the above mentioned 
 tads concerning the peculiar liability of the 
 governing authority of England, in that they 
 lead to an obfervation of a moft important po- 
 litical nature; which is, that this liability al- 
 lows feveral efTential branches of Englilh li- 
 berty to take place which without it could 
 not exift. For there is a very elTential con- 
 sideration to be made in every Science, though 
 Speculators are fometimes apt to lofe fight 
 of it, which is, that in order that things 
 may have exiflence, they mull be pojjiblc ; 
 in order that political regulations of any 
 kind may obtain their effect, they mull imply 
 no direct contradiction, either open or hidden, 
 to the nature of things, or to the other circum- 
 llances of the- Government. In reafoning from 
 tins principle, we ihall find that the liability of 
 the Governing executive authority in England, 
 and the weight it gives to the whole machine 
 of the State, has actually enabled the Englilh 
 Nation, confidered as a free Nation, to enjoy 
 feveral advantages which would really have 
 been totally unattainable in the other States 
 we have mentioned in former Chapters, what- 
 ever degree of public virtue we might even 
 f ippofe to have belonged to thofe who acted 
 in thofe States as the Advifers of the People,' 
 
 upon the fame fubjeft, in the Advertifement, or Preface,,- 
 at the head of his Work.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 421 
 
 4* in general who were trufted with xhe bu- 
 of framing the Laws (a). 
 
 One of thefe advantages refulting from the So- 
 lidity of the Government, is, the extraordinary 
 perfonal freedom which all ranks of individuals in 
 England, enjoy at the expence of the governing 
 authority. In the Roman Commonwealth, for 
 inftance, we fee the Senate to naye been veiled 
 with a number of powers totally deftrudtive of 
 the liberty of the Citizens: and the continuance 
 of thefe powers was, no doubt, in a great mea- 
 fure owing to the treacherous remiffnefs of thofe 
 Men in whom the People trufted for reprefTing 
 them, or even to their determined refolution 
 not to abridge thofe prerogatives. Yet, if we 
 attentively confider the conftant fituation of af- 
 fairs in that Republic, we fhall find that though 
 we might fuppofe thofe perfons to have been 
 ever fo truly attached to the caufe of the People, 
 it would not really have been poflible for them 
 to procure to the People an entire fecurity. 
 The right enjoyed by the Senate, of fuddenly 
 naming a Dictator with a power unreftraincd 
 by any law, or of inverting the Confuls with an 
 authority of much the fame kind, and the 
 power it at times afTumed of making formid- 
 able examples of arbitrary Juftice, were refour- 
 
 (a) I mould be very well fatisfied though only the more 
 reflecting clafs of readers were fully to underiland the ten- 
 dency of this Chapter : in the mean time it is confiderably 
 ^lluflrated beyond what it was in the former Editions 
 
 E e 3
 
 4ii THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 c.es of which the Republic could not, perhaps, 
 with fafety have been totally deprived : and 
 though thefe expedients frequently were ufed to 
 deflroy the juii liberty of the People, yet they 
 were alfo very often the means of preferving the 
 Commonwealth. 
 
 Upon the fame principle we mould poffibly 
 find that the OJlracifm, that arbitrary method 
 of baniming Citizens, was a neceiTary refourcc 
 in the Republic of Athens. A Venetian Noble 
 would perhaps alfo confefs, that however ter- 
 rible the State Inquifition eitabliihed in his Re- 
 public, may be even to the Nobles themfelves, 
 yet it would not be prudent entirely to abolifli 
 it, And we do not know but a Minifter of State 
 in France, though we might fuppofe him ever 
 i'o virtuous and moderate a Man, would fay 
 the fame with regard to the fecret imprifon- 
 ments, the lettres de cachet, and other arbitrary 
 (deviations from the fettled courfe of law, 
 which often take place in that Kingdom, and 
 in the other Monarchies of Europe. No doubt, 
 if he was the Man we fuppofe, he would con- 
 fefs the expedients we mention have in num- 
 berlefs inftances been villainoufly proflituted 
 to gratify the wantonnefs and private revenge 
 of Mmifters, or of thofe who had any intereil 
 with them; but itill perhaps he would con- 
 tinue to give it as his opinion, that the Crown, 
 notwithstanding its apparently immenfe ftrength, 
 cannot avoid recurring at times to expedients 
 3
 
 OF ENGLAN D. 42; 
 
 *>f this kind ; much lefs could it publicly and 
 abfolutely renounce them for ever. 
 
 It is therefore a moil advantageous circum- 
 ftance in the Englifh Government, that its fe- 
 curity renders all fuch expedients nnneceflary, 
 and that the Reprefentatives of the People 
 have not only been conflantly willing to pro- 
 mote the public liberty, but that the general 
 fituation of affairs has alfo enabled them to 
 carry their precautions (o far as the}- have done. 
 And indeed, when we confider what prero- 
 gatives the Crown, in England, has fincerely 
 renounced that in confequence of the inde- 
 pendence conferred on the Judges and of the 
 method of Trial by Jury, it is deprived of all 
 means of influencing the fettled courfe of the 
 law both in civil and criminal matters, that it 
 has renounced all power of fcizing the pro- 
 perty of individuals, and even of retraining 
 in any manner whatfoever, and for the fhorteft 
 time, the liberty of their perfons, we do not 
 know what we ought moft to admire, whether 
 the public virtue of thole who have deprived 
 the fupreme Executive Power of all thofe dan- 
 gerous prerogatives, or the nature of that fame 
 Power, which has enabled it to give them up 
 without ruin to itfelf whether the happy frame 
 of the Englifh Government, which makes thofe 
 ;n whom the People trult, continue fo faith*
 
 424 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ful in the difcharge of their duty, or to the foli- 
 dity of that fame Government, which really can 
 afford to leave to the People fo extenfive a de- 
 gree of freedom (a). 
 
 Again the Liberty of the Prefs, that great 
 advantage enjoyed by the Englifh Nation, 
 does not exift in any of the other Monarchies 
 of Europe, however well eftablifhed their power 
 may at firft feem to be; and it might even 
 be demonftrated that it cannot exift in them. 
 The moft watchful eye, we fee, is constantly 
 
 {a) At the times of the invafions of the Pretender, af- 
 fifted by the forces of hoftile Nations, the Habeas Corpus 
 Aft was indeed fufpended (which by the bye may ferve as 
 one proof, than in proportion as a Government is any how 
 in danger, it becomes neceffary to abridge the liberty of 
 the fubjeft) j but the executive power did not thus of it- 
 felf ftretch its own authority; the precaution was deliber- 
 ated upon and taken by the Reprefentatives of the 
 People ; and the detaining of individuals in confequence 
 of the fufpenfion of the Aft, was limited to a certain fixed 
 time. Notwithftanding the jufl: fears of internal and 
 hidden enemies which the circumftances of the times 
 might raife, the deviation from the former courfe of the 
 law was carried no farther than the fingle point we have 
 mentioned: Perfons detained by order of the Government, 
 were to be dealt with in the fame manner as thofe arretted 
 at the fuit of private individuals : the proceedings 'againft 
 them were to be carried on no otherwife than in a public 
 place : they were to be tried by their Peers, and have all 
 the ufual legal means of defence allowed to them, fuch tfs 
 calling of witneffes, peremptory challenge of Juries., &c
 
 OF ENGLAND. 425 
 
 kept in thofe Monarchies upon every kind of 
 publication ; and a jealous attention is paid even 
 to the loofe and idle fpeeches. of individuals. 
 Much unnecefTary trouble (we may be apt at 
 firft to think) js taken upon this fubject ; but 
 yet if we confider hpw uniform the conduct of 
 all thofe Governments is, how conftant and un- 
 remitted their cares in thofe refpedls, we {hall 
 become covinced, without looking farther, 
 that there muft be fome fort of necefiity for their 
 precautions. 
 
 In Republican States, for reafons which are 
 at bottom the fame as in the before mentioned 
 governments, the People are alio kept under 
 the greateft reftraints by thofe who are at the 
 head of the State. In the Roman Common- 
 wealth, for inftance, the liberty of writing was 
 curbed by the fevereft laws (a) : with regard 
 to the freedom of fpeech, things were but little 
 better, as we may conclude from feveral facts ; 
 and many inftances may even be produced of 
 the dread with which the private Citizens, upon 
 
 {a) The Law of the Twelve Tables had eftablifhed the 
 punifhment of death againft the author of a Libel : nor 
 \vas it by a Trial by Jwy that they determined what wa* 
 to be called a Libel. Si qxjis carmen occentassit, 
 
 ACTITASSIT, CONDIDISSlTjQUOD ALTER1 FLAGITIVM TAXIT* 
 CAPITAL ESTO.
 
 4 a6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 rcrtain occafions, communicated their political 
 opinions to the Con fuls, or to the Senate. 
 In the Venetian Republic, the prefs is moft 
 itridtly watched : nay, to forbear to fpeak 
 in any matter whatibever on the conduct: 
 of the Government, is the fundamental 
 maxim which they inculcate on the minds 
 of the People throughout their domini- 
 ons (a). 
 
 (a) Of this I have myfelf feen a proof fomewhat An- 
 gular, which I beg leave of the Reader to relate. Being, 
 in the year 1768, at Bergamo, the fir ft Town of the Vene- 
 tian State, as you come into it from the State of Milan,, 
 about an hundred and twenty miles diftant from Venice, 
 3 took a walk in the evening in the neighbourhood of the 
 1 own : and wanting to know the name of feveral places 
 which I faw at a diftance, I Hopped a young Countryman 
 xo afk him information. Finding him tp be a fenfible 
 young Man, I entered into fome farther converfation with 
 iiim j and as he had himfelf a great inclination to fee Ve- 
 nice, he afked me, whether I propofed to go there ? I 
 anfwered that I did : on whjch he immediately warned 
 mc when I was at Venice not to fpeak of the Prince (dtl 
 Prencipe) an appellation affumed by the Venetian Govern- 
 ment, in order, as I fuppofe, to convey to the People a 
 greater idea of their union among themfelves. As I wanted 
 p hear him talk farther on the fubject, I pretended to be 
 entirely ignorant in that refpett, and afked for what reafon 
 1 muft not fpeak of the Prince ? But he, (after the man- 
 ner, of the common People in Italy, who when, ftrongly 
 affected by any thing, rather choofe to exprefs themfelves
 
 GF ENGLAND. 427 
 
 With refpcft therefore to this point, it 
 may again be looked upon as a moft advanta- 
 geous circumftance in the Englifh Government, 
 that thofe who have been at the head of the 
 People, have not only been constantly difpofed 
 to procure the public liberty, but alfo that they 
 have found it poflible for them to do fo ; and 
 that the remarkable ftrength and fteadinefs of 
 the Government has admitted of that extenfive 
 freedom of fpeaking and writing which the 
 People of England enjoy. A moft advanta- 
 geous privilege, this ! which, affording to every 
 Man a means of laying his cpmplaints before 
 the Public, procures him almoft a certainty of 
 redrefs againft any act of oppremon that he may 
 have been expofed to : and which leaving, 
 moreover, to every Subject a right to give his 
 opinion on all public matters, and by thus in- 
 fluencing the fentiments of the Nation, to in- 
 fluence thofe of the Legislature itfelf (which is 
 fooner or later obliged to pay a deference to 
 them), procures to him a fort of Legislative 
 authority of a much more efficacious and bene- 
 
 by fome vehement gefture, than by words) ran the edge 
 of his hand, with gre^t quicknefs, along his neck, mean- 
 ing thereby to exprefs, that being ftrangled, or having 
 one's throat cut, was the inflan: conference of taking 
 fuch liberty.
 
 4*8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ficial nature than any formal right he might 
 enjoy of voting by a mere yea or nay, upon ge- 
 neral propofitions fuddenly offered to him, and 
 which he could have neither a mare in framing, 
 nor any opportunity of objecting to, and mo- 
 difying. 
 
 A privilege which, by railing in the People 
 a continual fenfe of their fecurity, and af- 
 fording them undoubted proofs that the Go- 
 vernment, whatever may be its form, is ul- 
 timately deftined to enfure the happinefs of 
 thofe who live under it, is both one of the 
 greater!: advantages of Freedom, and its fureft 
 characterise. The kind of fecurity as to their 
 perfons and pofTelTions which Subjects who 
 are totally deprived of that privilege, enjoy 
 at particular times, under other Governments, 
 perhaps may intitle them to look upon them- 
 felves as the well adminiflered property of 
 Rafters who rightly underftand their own in- 
 tereils ; but it is the right of canvafling with- 
 out fear the condudt of thofe who are placed 
 at their head, which cqnflitutes, a free Na- 
 tion (a). 
 
 . {a) If we confider the great advantages to public 
 Jiberty which refult from the inftitution of the Trial by 
 j^ry, aud from the Liberty of the Prefs,, we mall finq
 
 OF ENGLAND'. 423 
 
 The unbounded freedom of debate pofTefTed 
 by the Englifh Parliament, is alfo a confe- 
 quence of the peculiar liability of the Govern- 
 ment. All Sovereigns have agreed in their 
 jealoufy of AfTemblies of this kind, in their 
 dread of the privileges of AfTemblies who at- 
 tract in fo high a degree the attention of the 
 reft of the People, who in a courfe of time be- 
 come connected by fo many eiTential ties with 
 the bulk of the Nation, and acquire fo much 
 real influence by the eiTential fhare they muft 
 needs have in the management of public affairs* 
 and by the eminent ferviccs, in fhort, which 
 they are able to perform to the Community (a.) 
 Hence it has happened that Monarchs, or fingle 
 Rulers, in all Countries, have endeavoured to/ 
 difpenfe with the Afliftance of AfTemblies like 
 thofe we mention, notwithstanding the capital 
 
 England to be in reality a more Democratical State;' 
 than any other we are acquainted with. The Judi- 
 cial power, and the Cenforial power, are verted in the 
 People. 
 
 {a) And which they do aclually perform, till they are 
 able to throw off the reftraints of impartiality and mode- 
 ration ; a thing which, being Men, they never fail to do 
 when their influence is generally eftablifhed, and proper 
 opportunities offer. Sovereigns know thefe things, and 
 dread them.
 
 43 o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 advantages they might have derived from their 
 fervices towards the good government of the* 
 State; or if the circumftances of the times have 
 rendered it expedient for them to call fuch Af- 
 femblies together, they have ufed the utmofl en- 
 deavours in abridging thofe privileges and legif- 
 lative claim's which they foon found to prove 
 fo hoftile to their fecurity : in fhort, they have 
 ever found it impracticable to place any unre- 
 ferved truft in public Meetings of this kind. 
 
 We may here name Cromwell,' as he was' 
 fupported by a numerous army, and poffefTed 
 more power than any foreign Monarch who has' 
 not been fecured by an armed force. Even af- 
 ter he had purged, by the agency of Colonel 
 Pride and two regiments, the Parliament that 
 was fitting when his power became fettled 
 thereby thrufting out all his opponents to the 
 amount of about two hundred, he foon found; 
 his whole authority endangered by their pro- 
 ceedings, and was at laft under a neceffity of 
 turning them out in the military maimer with 
 which every one is acquainted. Finding Hill 
 a Meeting of this kind highly expedient to le- 
 galize his military authority, he called together 
 that AfTembly which was called Bareboe*s Par- 
 liamcnt. He had himfelf chofen the Members
 
 OF ENGLAND. 431 
 
 of this Parliament to the number of about an 
 hundred and twenty,- and they had feverally re- 
 ceived the fummcns from him ; yet notwith- 
 standing this circumftarfcej and the total want of 
 peribnal weight in molt of the Members, he 
 began in a very few months, and in the midft of 
 his powerful victorious army, to feel a ferious 
 alarm at their proceedings; he foon heard them 
 talk of their own divine commiffion, and of the 
 authority they had received from the Lord ; 
 and, in fhort, finding he could not truit them, 
 he employed the offices of a fecond Colonel, to 
 effect their difmiffion. Being now dignified 
 with the legal appellation of Proteftor, he ven- 
 tured to calt a Parliament elected by confidcr- 
 able parts of the people ; but though the ex- 
 istence of this Parliament was grounded, we 
 might fay grafted, upon his own ; and though 
 bands of Soldiers weFe even ported in the 
 avenues to keep out all fuch Members as refufed 
 to take certain perfonal engagements to him, 
 he made fuch hafte in the irlue, to rid himfelt 
 of their prefence, as to contrive a mean quib- 
 ble or device to fhorten the time of their fitting 
 lby ten or twelve days (<?). To a fourth Af- 
 
 (*) They were to have fat five months ; but Cromwell 
 pretended that the months were to confift of only twenty-
 
 432 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fembly he again applied ; but, though the 
 ele&ions had been fo managed as to procure 
 him a formal tender of the Crown during the 
 firft fitting, he put a final end to the fecond with 
 refentment and precipitation (a). 
 
 The example of the Roman Emperors, whofe 
 power was outwardly fo prodigiousy may alfo 
 be introduced here. They ufed to mew the ut- 
 moft jealoufy in their conduct: with refpedt to 
 the Roman Senate ; and that AlTembly which 
 the prepovTemon of the People, who looked 
 upon it as the ancient remains of the Republic, 
 had made it expedient to continue, were not fuf- 
 fercd to afTemble but under the drawn fcymitars' 
 of the Pretorian guards. 
 
 Even the Kings of France, though" their 
 authority is fo unqueflioned, fo" univerfally re- 
 fpedted, as well a% ftrongly fupported, have felt 
 frequent anxiety from the claims and proceed- 
 ings of the Parliament of Paris ; an AiTembly 
 
 eight days ; as this was the way of reckoning time ufed 
 in paying the army, and the fleet. 
 
 (a) The hiflory of the cor.dufl of the deliberating and 
 debating AiTcmbliei we are alluding to, in regard to the 
 Monarchs, or fingle Rulers of any denomination, who 
 fummon them together, may be exprefTed in a very few 
 words. If the Monarch is unarmed, they over-rule him 
 fo as almoft entirely to fet frm afide : if his power is of 
 a military kind, they form connections with the army.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 433 
 
 of fo much lefs weight than the Englifh Parlia- 
 ment. The alarm has been mentioned which 
 the late King at laft exprefTed concerning their 
 meafures, as well as the expedient to which he 
 reforted, to free himfelf from their prefence. 
 And when the prefent King thought proper to 
 call again this Parliament together, a meafure 
 highly prudent in the beginning of his reign, 
 every jealous precaution was at the fame time 
 taken to abridge thofe privileges of deliberating 
 and remonftrating upon which any diflant clainrf 
 to, or llruggle for, a fhare in the Supreme au- 
 thority might be grounded. 
 
 It may be objected that the pride of Kings, 
 or fingle Rulers, makes them averfe to the ex- 
 iftence of Affemblies like thofe we mention, 
 and defpife the capital fervic%9 which they 
 might derive from them for the good govern- 
 ment of their Kingdoms. I grant it may in fome 
 meafure be fo. But if we examine into the ge- 
 neral fituation of affairs in different States, and 
 into the examples with which their Hiftory 
 lupplies us, we Uiall alfo find that the pride of 
 thofe Kings agrees in the main with the intereft 
 and quiet of their Subjects, and that their pre- 
 venting the Affemblies we fpeak of from meet- 
 ing, or, when met, from afiuming too large a 
 
 F f
 
 434 TflE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fhare in the management of public affairs, is, in 
 a great meafure, matter of neceffity. 
 
 We may therefore reckon it as a very great 
 advantage, that, in England, no fuch neceffity 
 exifts. Such is the frame of the Government, 
 that the Supreme executive authority can both 
 give leave to affemble, and fhevv the molt un* 
 refer ved truft, when affembled, to thofe two 
 Houfes which concur together to form the Le- 
 giflature. 
 
 Thefe two Houfes, we fee, enjoy the mofr. 
 complete freedom in their debates, whether 
 the fubjedt be grievances , or regulations concern- 
 ing government matters of any kind : no re- 
 ftriction whatever is laid upon them ; they may 
 ltart any fubjeel: they pleafe. The Crown is not 
 to take any notice of their deliberations : its 
 wifhes, or even its name, are not to be intro- 
 duced in the debates. And, in fhort, what 
 makes the freedom of deliberating, exercifed 
 by the two Houfes, really to be unlimited, un- 
 bounded, is the privilege, or fovereignty we 
 may fay, enjoyed by each within its own walls, 
 in confequence of which nothing done or faid in 
 Parliament, is to be queftioned in any place out 
 of Parliament. Nor will it be pretended by 
 thofe perfons who are acquainted with the Eng- 
 lish Hiflory, that thofe privileges of Parliament
 
 OF ENGLAND. 435 
 
 ive mention are nominal privileges, only privi- 
 leges upon paper, which the Crown has difre- 
 garded whenever it has thought proper, and to 
 the violations of which the Parliament have ufed 
 very tamely to fubmit. That thefe remarkable 
 advantages, that this total freedom from any 
 compulsion or even fear, and in fhort this unli- 
 mited liberty of debate, fo {Iriclly claimed by 
 the Parliament, and fo fcrupuloufly allowed by 
 the Crown, Ihould be exercifed year after year 
 during a long courfe of time, without produc- 
 ing the leaft relaxation in the execution of the 
 lawSj the fmallefc degree of anarchy, are cer- 
 tainly very lingular political phenomena. 
 
 It may be faid that the remarkable Solidity 
 of the governing Executive authority, in Eng- 
 land, operates to the advantage of the People 
 with refpecl to the objedts we mention, in a two- 
 fold manner. In the firft place, it takes from 
 the great Men in the Nation all ferious ambi- 
 tion to invade this authority, thereby prevent- 
 ing thofe anarchical and more or lefs bloody 
 Itruggles to refult from their debates, which 
 have fo conftantly difturbed other Countries. 
 In the fecond place, it infpires thofe Great Men 
 with that falutary jealoufy of the fame authority 
 which leads them to frame fuch effectual provi- 
 
 F f 2
 
 4j6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 lions for laying it under proper reftraints. On 
 which I fhall obferve, by way of a ihort digref- 
 fion, that this diftinguifhed Jiabillty of the 
 executive authority of the Englilh Crown, af- 
 fords an explanation for the peculiar manner in 
 which public commotions have conftantly been 
 terminated in England, compared with the 
 manner in which the fame events have been 
 concluded in other Kingdoms. When I 
 mentioned, in a former Chapter, this peculi- 
 arity in the Englim Government, I mean the 
 accuracy, impartiality, and univerfality, of the 
 provifions by which peace, after internal dis- 
 turbances, has been reftored to the Nation, I 
 confined my comparifons to inftances drawn 
 from Republican Governments, purpofely poft- 
 poning to fay any thing of Governments of a 
 Monarchical form, till I had introduced the 
 very eflenrial observation contained in this 
 Chapter, which is, that the power of Crowns, 
 in other Monarckies, has not been able, by it- 
 feif, to produce the fame effects it has in Eng- 
 land, that is, has not been able to infpire the 
 Great Men in the State with any thing like that 
 falutary jealoufy we mention, nor of courfe to 
 induce them to unite in a real common caufc 
 with the reft of the People. In other Monar*
 
 Or ENGLAN : D. 45? 
 
 chies(^), thofe Men who, during the continua- 
 tion of the public diilurbanccs, were at the 
 head of the People, finding it in their power, 
 in the iffue, to parcel out, more or lefs, the Su- 
 preme governing authority (or even the State 
 itfelf), and to transfer the fame to themfelves, 
 conftantly did fo, in the fame manner, and from 
 the very fame reafons, as it conftantly happened 
 in the ancient Commonwealths ; thofe Monar- 
 chical Governments being in reality, fo far as 
 that, of a Republican nature : and the govern- 
 ing authority was left, at the conclusion, in the 
 fame undefined extent it had before (b). But 
 in England, the great Men in the Nation find- 
 ing themfelves in a fituation effentially differ- 
 ent, loft no time in purfuits like thofe in 
 which the great Men of other countries ufed 
 to indulge themfelves on the occafion we men- 
 tion. Every Member of the Legiflature plainly 
 perceived, from the general afpect of affairs 
 
 {a) I mean, before the introduction of thofe numerous 
 Sanding armies which are now kept by all the Crowns 
 of Europe : fince that epoch, which is of no very ancient 
 date, no Treaty has been entered into by thofe downs 
 with any Subjecls. 
 
 () As a remarkable inftance of fuch a Treaty may b* 
 mentioned that by which the War for the Public giod was 
 terminated in France. It is quoted in page 30 of this 
 Work. F f 3
 
 438 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 and his feelings, that the Supreme exeeu-: 
 tive authority in the State muft in the iffue fall 
 fome where undivided, and continue fo ; and 
 being moreover fenfible, that neither perfonal 
 advantages of any kind, nor the power of any 
 faction, but the law alone, could afterwards be 
 an effectual reftraint upon its motions, they had 
 no thought or aim left, except the framing with 
 care thofe laws on which their own liberty was 
 to continue to depend, and to reftrain a power 
 which they, fomehovv, judged it fo impracti- 
 cable to transfer to themfelves or their party, 
 or to render themfelves independent of. Thcfe 
 obfervations I thought neceifary to be added to 
 thofe in the xv. Chapter, to which I now refer 
 the reader. 
 
 Nor has the great freedom of canvafling po- 
 litical fubjedts we have defcribed, been limited 
 to the Members of the Legiilature, or confined 
 to the walls of Weftminfter, that is, to that ex- 
 clufive fpot on which the two Houfes meet : 
 the like privilege is allowed to the other 
 orders of the People ; and a full fcope is 
 given to that fpirit of party, and a complete 
 fecurity infured to thofe numerous and irregu- 
 lar meetings, which, efpecially when directed 
 to matters of government, create fo much un- 
 eafinefs in the Sovereigns of other Countries.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 439 
 
 Individuals even may, in fuch meetings, take ail 
 active part for procuring the fuccefs of thofe 
 public fteps which they wiih to fee purfued ; 
 they may frame petitions to be delivered to the 
 Crown, or to both Houfes, either to procure 
 the repeal of meafures already entered upon by 
 Government, or to prevent the pairing of fucli 
 as are under consideration, or to obtain the en- 
 acting of new regulations of any kind : they may 
 feverally fubfcribe their names to fuch petitions : 
 the law fets no reftriction on their numbers ; 
 nor has it, we may fay, taken any precaution to 
 prevent even the abufe that might be made of 
 fuch freedom. 
 
 . That mighty political engine, the prefs, is 
 alfo at- their fervice; they may avail themfelves 
 of it to advertife the time and place, as well as 
 the intent, of the meetings, and moreover to fet 
 off and inculcate the advantages of thofe notions 
 which the wiiTi is to fee adopted. 
 
 Such meetings may be repeated ; and every 
 individual may deliver what opinion he pleafes 
 on the propofed fubje&s, though ever fo direct- 
 ly oppofite to the views or avowed defigns of the 
 Government. The Member of the Legislature 
 may, if he choofes, have admittance among 
 them, and again enforce thofe topics which 
 have not obtained the fuccefs he expected, in, 
 
 F fi
 
 440 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 that Koufe to which he belongs. The difap- 
 pointed Statefmen, the Miniiler turned out, alio 
 find the door open to them : they may bring ia 
 the whole weight of their influence and of their 
 connections : they may exert every nerve to en- 
 lift the AiTembly in the number of their fup- 
 porters: they are bid to do their worft : they 
 fly through the Country from one place of meet- 
 ing to another : the clamour increafes : the 
 Conflitution, one may thinly is going to be 
 ihaken to its very foundations : but thefe 
 mighty flruggles, by fome means or other, al- 
 ways find a proportionate degree of re-action : 
 new difficulties, and at lafl inluperable impedi- 
 ments, grow up in the way of thofe who would 
 take advantage of the general ferment to raife 
 themfelves on the wreck of the governing Au- 
 thority : a fecret force exerts itfelf, which gra- 
 dually brings things back to a flate of modera- 
 tion and calm ; and that fea fo flormy, to ap- 
 pearance fo deeply agitated, ccnftantly flops at 
 certain limits which it Teems as if it wanted the 
 power to pafs. 
 
 The impartiality with which juflice is dealt 
 to all orders of Men in England, is alio in 
 creat meafure owing to the peculiar liability of 
 the Government : the very remarkable, high 
 
 degree, to which this, impartiality is carried, is 
 
 8
 
 Of ENGLAND. 44* 
 
 one of thofe things which, being impoflible in 
 other Countries, are pofilble under the Go- 
 vermenf of this Country. In the ancient Com- 
 monwealths, from the inftances that have been 
 introduced in a former place, and .from others 
 that might be quoted, it is evident that no re- 
 drefs was to be obtained for the acts of injuftice 
 or oppreffion committed by the Men poffefled 
 of influence or wealth upon the inferior Ci- 
 tizens. In the Monarchies of Europe, in for- 
 mer times, abuies of a like kind prevailed to z 
 moft enormous degree. In our days, notwith- 
 standing the great degrees of ftrength acquired 
 by the different Governments, it is matter of the 
 utmoftdifficulty for fubjedts of the inferior clafies 
 to obtain the remedies of the law againft certain 
 individuals : in fome Countries it is impollible, 
 let the abufe be ever fo flagrant ; an open at- 
 tempt to puriue fuch remedies being more- 
 over attended with danger. Even in thofe 
 Monarchies of Europe in which the Govern- 
 ment is fupported both by real ftrength, and 
 by civil Inftitutions of a very advantageous na- 
 ture, great differences prevail between indivi- 
 duals in regard to the facility of obtaining the 
 remedies of the law ; and to feek for redrefs is 
 at bed in many cafes, fo arduous and precarious 
 an attempt as to take from injured individuals
 
 44* THE CO'NSITITUTON 
 
 all thoughts of encountering the difficulty. 
 Nor are thefe abufes we mention, in the former 
 or prefent Governments of Europe, to be attri- 
 buted Only to the want of refolution in the 
 Heads of thefe Governments. In fome Coun- 
 tries, the Sovereign by an open dcfign to fup- 
 prefs thefe abufes, would have endangered at 
 once his whole authority; and in others, he 
 would find obftructions multiply fo in his way 
 as to compel him, and perhaps foon enough 
 too, to drop the undertaking. How can a Mo- 
 narch make, alone, a perfevering Hand againft 
 the avowed expectations of all the great Men by 
 whom he is furrounded, and againft the loud 
 claims of powerful claffes of individuals ? In a 
 Commonwealth, what is the Senate to do when 
 they find that their refufmg to protect a power- 
 ful offender of their own clafs, or to indulge 
 fome great Citizen with the impunity of his 
 friends, is likely to be productive of ferious di- 
 vifions among themfelves, or perhaps of difturb- 
 ances among the People ? 
 
 If we caft our eyes on the ftrid: and uni- 
 verfal impartiality with which juflice is admi- 
 niftered in England, we fhall foon become con- 
 vinced that fome inward effential difference 
 . exifts between the Englim Government, and 
 thofe of other Countries, and that its power i
 
 OF ENGLAND. 443 
 
 founded on caufes of a diflincl: nature. Indivi-r 
 duals of the moil exalted rank do not entertain 
 fo much as the thought to raife. the fm.alleft 
 direct oppofition to the operation of the law. 
 The complaint of the mean.eft Subject, if. pre- 
 ferred and, fupported in the ufual way, imme- 
 diately meets with a ferious regard. The Op- 
 preflbr of the moil extenfive influence, though. 
 in the midit-ef a train of retainers, nay, though 
 in the ful left flight of his career and pride* and 
 furrounded by thoufands of applauders and par- 
 tifans, is flopped fhort at the fight of the legal 
 paper, which is delivered into his hands, and a 
 TipfhuT is fuihcient to bring him away, and 
 produce him before the Bench. 
 
 Such is the greatnefs and uninterrupted pre- 
 valence of the law (a), fuch is in fhort the con- 
 tinuity of omnipotence, of refifllefs fuperi- 
 ority, it exhibits that the extent of its effecls at 
 length ceafes to be a fubjedt of obfervation to 
 the Public. 
 
 Nor are great or wealthy Men to feek for re- 
 drefs or fatisfa&ion of any kind, by any other 
 means than fuch as are open to all : even the 
 Sovereign has bound himfelf to refort to no 
 other : and experience has fliewn that he may 
 without danger, trufl the prote&ion of his per- 
 
 (a) Lex magna eft Cff pravalebit.
 
 444 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Ton, and of the places of his refidence, to the 
 flow and litigious affiflance of the law (a). 
 
 Another very great advantage attending this 
 remarkable liability of the Engl ifh Government 
 we are defcribing, is, that the fame is operated 
 without the affiftance of an armed {landing 
 force : the conftant expedient this, of all other 
 Governments. On this occafion I ihall intro- 
 duce a paffage of Doctor Adam Smith (), in a 
 Work published fince the prefent Chapter was 
 firft written, in which pafTage an opinion cer- 
 tainly erroneous is contained : the miftakes of 
 perfons of his very great abilities deferve at- 
 tention. This Gentleman, flruck with the ne- 
 ceffity of a fufficient power of re-action, of a 
 fufficient ftrength, on the fide of Government, 
 to refift the agitations attending on liberty, has 
 looked round, and judged the Engliih Govern- 
 ment derived the lingular {lability it manifefts 
 from the {landing force it has at its difpofal: 
 the following are his exprefiions. " To a Sove- 
 ** reign who feels himfelf fupported, not only by 
 
 (a) I remember, during the time after my firft coming 
 to this Country, I took notice of the boards fet up from 
 place to place behind the inclofure of Richmond park. 
 " Whoever trefpaffes upon this ground will be profecuttd" 
 * {b) An Inquiry into 4iM Nature and Caufes of the Wealth of 
 Ncrious. Book V. Chap, I. vol. 1 1,. p. 313, 314.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 445 
 
 ** the natural Ariftrocracy of the Country, but 
 " by a well regulated {landing army, the rudeft, 
 " the mofl: groundlefs, and the moft licentious 
 " remonflrances can give little disturbance. 
 " He can fafely pardon or negledt them, and 
 " his confcioufnefs of his fuperiority naturally 
 ' difpofes him to do ib. That degree of liberty 
 " which approaches to licentioufnefs, can be tolerated 
 ft only in Countries where the Sovereign is fecured by 
 " a well regulated Jianding army (a)" 
 
 The above portions are grounded on the 
 notion that an army places in the hand of the 
 Sovereign an united irrefiftible flrength, a 
 (trength liable to no accident, difficulties, or 
 exceptions; a fuppofition this, which is not 
 conformable to experience. If a Sovereign was 
 endued with a kind of extraordinary power at- 
 tending on his perfon, at once to lay Under wa- 
 ter whole legions of infurgents, or to repulfe 
 and fweep them away by flames and mocks of 
 the electrical fluid, then indeed he might ufc 
 the great forbearance above defcribed : though 
 it is not perhaps very likely he would put up 
 
 {a) The Author's defign in the whole paflage, is to 
 ihew that Handing armies, under proper reftrittions, can- 
 not be huitful to public liberty; and may in fome cafes be 
 ufeful to it, by freeing the Sovereign from any trouble- 
 fome je:!oufy in regard to this liberty.
 
 446 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 with the rude and groun&lefi remonftrances of his 
 iubjects, and with their licentious freedom, yet$ 
 he might, with fafety, do or not do fo, at his 
 own choice. But an army is not that fimpk 
 weapon which is here fuppofed. It is formed 
 of Officers and Soldiers who feel the fame paf- 
 fions with the reft of the people, the fame dif- 
 pofition to promote their own intereft and im- 
 portance, when they find out their firength, 
 and proper opportunities oiTer. What will 
 therefore be the refource of the Sovereign, if, in- 
 to that army on the affiftance of which he relies, 
 the fame party fpirit creeps by which his other 
 Subjects are actuated ? whereto will he take his 
 'refuge, if the fame political caprices, abetted by 
 the ierious ambition of a few leading Men, the 
 fame reftlelihefs, and at laft perhaps the fame 
 difafTettion, begin to pervade the fmaller king- 
 dom of the army, by which the main Iffingdcm 
 or Nation are agitated ? 
 
 The prevention of dangers like thofe jufl 
 mentioned, conftitutes the moft effential part of 
 the precautions and Hate craft of Rulers, in 
 thofe Governments which are fecured by ftand-^ 
 ing armed forces. Mixing the troops formed 
 of natives with foreign auxiliaries, difperfmg 
 them in numerous bodies over the country, and' 
 continually fhifting their quarters, are among
 
 OF ENGLAND. 447 
 
 the methods that are ufed; which it does 
 not belong to our fubjed: to enumerate, an/ 
 more than the extraordinary expedients em- 
 ployed by the Eaftern Monarchs for the fame 
 purpofes. But one caution very effcntial to 
 be mentioned here, and which the Govern- 
 ments we allude to, never fail to take before 
 every other, is to retrench from their unarmed 
 Subjects, a freedom which, tranfmitted to the 
 Soldiery, would be attended with fo fatal con- 
 fequences : hindering fo bad examples from be- 
 ing communicated to thole in whole hands their 
 power and life are trufted, is what every notion 
 of felf-prefervation fuggefts to them: every 
 weapon is accordingly exerted to fupprefs the 
 riling and fpreading of fo awful a contagion. 
 
 In general, it may be laid down as a maxim, 
 that, where the Sovereign looks to his army 
 for the fecurity of his perfon and authority, the 
 fame military laws by which this army is kept 
 together, mud be extended over the whole 
 Nation: not in regard to military duties and 
 exercifes ; but certainly in regard to all that 
 relates to the refpedt due to the Sovereign and 
 to his orders. The martial law, concerning 
 thefe tender points, muft be univerfal. The 
 jealous regulations concerning mutiny and con- 
 tempt of orders, cannot be feverely enforced on
 
 448 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 that part of the Nation which fecures the fub- 
 jection of the reft, and enforced too through the 
 whole fcale of military fubordination, from 
 the Soldier to the Officer, up to the very Head 
 of the military Syftem, while the more nu- 
 merous and inferior part of the People are left 
 t> enjoy an unreftrained freedom : that fecret 
 difpofition which prompts Mankind to refill 
 and counteract their Superiors, cannot be fur- 
 rounded by fuch formidable checks on the one 
 'fide, and be left to be indulged to a degree of 
 licentioufnefs and wantonnefs, on the other. 
 
 In a Country where an army is kept, capable 
 of commanding the obedience of the Nation, 
 this army will, both imitate for themfelves the 
 licentioufnefs above mentioned, and check it in 
 the People. Every Officer and Soldier, in fuck 
 a Country, claim a fuperiority in regard to other 
 individuals ; and in proportion as their affiftance 
 is relied upon by the Government, expect a 
 greater or lei's degree of fubmimon from the 
 reft of the People (tf). 
 
 (a) In the beginning cf the pafTage which is here ex- 
 amined, the Author fays, " Where the Sovereign is him- 
 " (elf the Genera:, and the principal Nobdity and Gentry 
 " of the Country, the chief GfHcers of the array, wher 
 the military force is placed under the command of 
 thofc who have the greuteii interelt in the fupport of
 
 OF ENGLAND, 449 
 
 The fame Author concludes his above quot- 
 ed obfervations concerning the fecurity of the 
 
 " the civil authority, becaufe they have the greater!: fhare 
 ' ! of that authority, a Handing army can never be dan- 
 " gerous to liberty. On the contrary, it may in fome 
 " cafes be favourable to liberty, &c. &c."- In a Coun- 
 try fo circumftanced, a {landing army can never be dan- 
 gerous to liberty : no, not the liberty Of thofe principal 
 Nobility and Gentry, efpecially if they have wit enough 
 to form combinations among themfelves againft the Sove- 
 reign. Such an union as is here mentioned, of the civil 
 and military powers, in the Ariftocratical body of the Na- 
 tion, leaves both the Sovereign and the People without re- 
 foiirce. If the former Kings of Scotland had imagined 
 to adopt the expedient of a Handing army, and had trufted 
 this army thus defrayed by them, to thofe Noblemen and 
 Gentlemen who had rendered themfelves hereditary Ad- 
 mirals, hereditary High Stewarts, hereditary High Confta- 
 bles, hereditary Great Chamberlains, hereditary Judices 
 General, hereditary Sheriffs of Counties, &c. they would 
 have but badly mended the diforders under which the 
 Government of their Country laboured : they would only 
 have fupplied thefe Nobles with frefh weapons againft 
 each other, againft the Sovereign, and againft the People. 
 
 If thofe Members of the Britifh Parliament who Come- 
 times make the whole Nation refound with the clamour 
 of their diffenfions, had an army under their command 
 which they migiit engage in the ttippoit of their preten- 
 tions, the red: of the People would not be che better for it. 
 Happily the fwords are feenred, and force is removed 
 from their Debates. 
 
 The Author we are quoting, has deemed a Government 
 Jo be a ampler machine, and an army a fimpler inftru- 
 
 G g
 
 4$o THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 power of an armed Sovereign, by immediately 
 adding : " It is in fuch Countries only that it 
 " is unnecefiary that the Sovereign mould be 
 " trufted with any difcretionary power for 
 " fuppreffing even the wanton nefs of this li- 
 " centious liberty." The idea here expreffed , 
 coinciding with thofe already difcuffed, I fhall 
 fay nothing farther on the fubjedt. My reafort 
 for introducing the above exprelTions, has been, 
 that they lead me to take notice of a remark- 
 able circumftance in the Englifh Government, 
 From the expreffion, it is unnecejfary the Sovereign 
 ftould he trufted with any difcretionary power, the ' 
 Author appears to think that a Sovereign at the 
 head of an army, and whofe power is fecured 
 by this army, ufes to wait to fct himfelf in mo- 
 tion, till he has received leave for that purpofe, 
 that is, till he has been trufted with a power 
 for fo doing. This notion in the Author we 
 quote, is borrowed from the Heady and tho- 
 roughly legal Government of this Country ; 
 but the like law doctrine, or principle, obtains 
 under no other Government. In all Monarchies, 
 
 ment, than they in reality are. Like many other per- 
 form of great abilities, while ftruck with a certain pecu- 
 liar confederation, he has overlooked others no lefs impor- 
 tant.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 451 
 
 (and it is the fame in Republics) the Exe- 
 cutive power in the State is fuppofed to pof- 
 fefs, originally and by itfelf, all manner of law- 
 ful authority : every one of its exertions is 
 deemed to be legal ; and they do not ceafe to be 
 fo, till they are flopped by fome exprefs and po- 
 fitive regulation. The Sovereign, and alfo the 
 civil Magiftrate, till fo flopped by fome poiitive 
 law, may come upon the Subject when they 
 choofe; they may queftion any of his actions 5 
 they may conftrue them into unlawful acts; and 
 inflict a penalty, as they pleafe : in thefe refpects 
 they may be thought to abufe, but not to ex- 
 ceed, their power. The authority of the Go- 
 vernment, in fhort, is fuppofed to be unlimited 
 fo far as there are no vifible boundaries fet up 
 againft it : behind and within thefe boundaries, 
 lies whatever degree of liberty the Subject may 
 poffefs. 
 
 In England, the very reverfe obtains. It is 
 not the authority of the Government, it is the 
 liberty of the Subject, which is fuppofed to be 
 unbounded. All the Individual's actions are 
 fuppofed to be lawful, till that law is pointed 
 out which makes them to be otherwife. The 
 onus probandi is here transferred from the Subject 
 to the Prince. The Subject is not at any time 
 
 to mew the grounds of his conduct. When the 
 
 Gg 2
 
 452 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Sovereign or Magiftrate think proper to exert 
 themfelves, it is their bufinefs to find out and 
 produce the law in their own favour, and the 
 prohibition againft the Subject (#). 
 
 (a) I fhal! take the liberty to mention another fact re- 
 fpe&ing myfelf, as it may ferve to elucidate the above ob- 
 servations ; or at leafl my maimer of expreiTing them. I 
 remember when I was beginning to pay attention to the 
 operations of the Englim Government, I was under a pre- 
 poifemon of quite a contrary nature to that of the Gentle- 
 man whofe opinions have been above difcuffed : I ufed 
 to take it for granted that every article of liberty the 
 Subject enjoys in this Country, was grounded upon feme 
 pofithe la*- by which this liberty was infured to him. 
 In regard to the freedom of the prefs I had no doubt but 
 it was fo, and that there exifted lbme particular law, or 
 rather feries of laws or legiflative paragraphs, by which 
 this freedom was defined and carefully fecured : and as 
 the liberty of writing happened at that time to be carried 
 very far, and to excite a great deal of attention (the noife 
 about the Middlefex election had not yet fubftded), I par- 
 ticularly vv liked to fee thofe laws I fuppofed, not doubting 
 but there muft be fomething remarkable in the wording of 
 them. i looked into thofe law books I had opportu- 
 nities to come at, fuch as Jacob's and Cunningham's 
 Law Diclicnaries, Wood's hjlitates, and Judge Elack- 
 iione's Commentaries. I alio found means to have a fight 
 of Comyn's D:gcfi cf the Lav:: of England, and I was 
 again difappointed: this Author, though this Work confifts 
 of five folio Volumes, had not had, any more than the 
 Authors juit mentioned, any room to fpare for the interefi- 
 inpr law I was in fearch of. At length it occurred to 
 mc, though not immediately, that this Liberty of the
 
 OF ENGLAND. 453 
 
 This kind of law principle, owing to the ge- 
 neral fpirit by which all parts of the Govern- 
 ment are influenced, is even carried fo far, that 
 any quibble, or trifling circumftance, by which 
 an Offender may be enabled to flep afide and 
 efcape, though ever fo narrowly, the reach of 
 the law, are fufficient to fcreen him from pu- 
 nifhment, let the immorality or intrinfic guilt 
 of his conduct be ever fo openly admitted (a). 
 
 Such a narrow circumfcription of the exer- 
 tions of the Government, is very extraordinary : 
 it does not exift in any Country but this ; nor 
 
 prefs was grounded upon its not being prohibited, that 
 this want of prohibition was the fole, and at the fame time 
 folid, foundation of it. This led me, when I afterwards 
 thought of writing fomething upon the Government of 
 this Country, to give the definition of the freedom of the 
 prefs which is contained in p. 296, 297 : adding to it the 
 important confideration of all actions refpecling publica- 
 tions being to be decided by a jury. 
 
 (a) A number of inilances, fome even of a ludicrous 
 kind, might be quoted in fupport of the above objerva- 
 tion, Even only a trifling flaw in the words of an Indict- 
 ment, is enough to make it void. The reader is alfo re- 
 ferred to the fact mentioned in the note, p. 18c, and to 
 that in p. 317, 318, of this Work. 
 
 I do not remember the name of that party Writer who, 
 having publifhed a cieaibnable writing in regard to which 
 he efcaped punilhrnen:, ufed afterwards to anfwer to his 
 friends, when they reproached him with his rafhnefs, / 
 hnsiv I was writing within an inch of the gallows. The law 
 
 G g 3
 
 454 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 could it. The (ituation of other Governments 
 is fuch that they cannot thus allow themfelves 
 to be ihut out of the unbounded fpace unoccu- 
 pied by any law, in order to have their motions 
 confined to that fpot which exprefs and prevU 
 oufly declared provifions have chalked out. 
 The power of thefe Governments being con- 
 ftantly attended with more or lefs precarioufnefs, 
 there muft be a degree of difcretion anfwerable 
 to it 0), 
 
 The foundation of that law principle, or 
 dodtrine,. which confines the exertion of the 
 power of the Government to fuch cafes only as 
 are exprcffed by a law in being, was laid when 
 the Great Charter was paffed : this reftricYion 
 was implied in one of thofe general impartial 
 articles which the Barons united with the 
 People to obtain from the Sovereign. The 
 Crown, at that time, derived from its foreign 
 
 being both afcertained and fuiclly adhered to, he had been 
 enabled to bring his words and portions i"o nicely within 
 compafs. 
 
 (a) It might perhaps alfo be proved, that the great leni- 
 ty ufed in England in the adminiftration of criminal juf- 
 tice, both in regard to the mildnefs, and to the frequent 
 remitting, of punifhments, is effentially connected with 
 the fame circumftance of the Jlability of the Government. 
 Experience fnews that it is neediefs to ufe any great degree 
 of harftinefs and feverity in regard to Offenders; and the 
 Supreme governing authority is under no neceflity of fhew-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 455 
 
 :dominions, that {lability and inward flrength 
 in regard to the Engliih Nation, which is now 
 in a fecret hidden manner annexed to the Civil 
 branch of its Office, and which, though operat- 
 ing by different means, continues to maintain 
 that kind of confederacy againft it, and union 
 between the different Orders of the People. 
 By the article in Magna Chart a here alluded to, 
 the Sovereign bound itfelf neither to go, nor 
 fend 9 upon the Subject, otherwife than by the 
 Trial of Peers, and the Law of the land (a). 
 This article was however afterwards difre- 
 garded in practice, in confequence of the law- 
 ful efficiency which the King claimed for his 
 Proclamations, and efpecially by the inftitutiori 
 of the Court of Star Chamber, which grounded 
 its proceedings not only upon thefe Proclama- 
 tions, but alfo upon the particular rules it chofe 
 to frame within itfelf. By the abolition of this 
 Court (and alfo of the Court of High Com- 
 mimon) in the reign of Charles the Firft, the 
 above provifion of the Great Charter was put 
 In actual force; and it has appeared by the 
 
 sng the fubordinate Magiftracies any bad example in that 
 refpett. 
 
 (a) .... Nee fuper turn ibimus, nee fuper eum mittimus, 
 tiifi per legale judicium pari urn <vel per legem terra. Cap. 
 XXIX, 
 
 Gg 4
 
 456 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 event, that the very extraordinary reftriction 
 upon the governing authority we are alluding 
 to, and its execution, are no more than what the 
 intrinfic fituation of things, and the flrength of 
 the Conftitution, can bear (<z). 
 
 The law doctrine we have above defcribed, 
 and its being ftrictly regarded by the High 
 governing authority, I take to be the moft 
 characterise circumftance in the Englim Go- 
 vernment, and the moft pointed proof that can 
 be given of the true freedom which is the con- 
 fequence of its frame. The practice of the 
 Executive authority thus to fquare its motions 
 upon fuch laws, and fuch only, as are afcer- 
 tained and declared beforehand, cannot be the 
 refult of that kind of liability which the Crown 
 
 (a) The Court of Star Chamber was like z Court of 
 Equity in regard to criminal matters ; it took upon itfelf 
 to decide upon thofe cafes of offence upon which the ufual 
 Courts of Law, when uninfluenced by the Crown, refufed 
 to decide, cither on account of the filence of the laws in 
 being, or of the particular rules they had eftablifhed within 
 themfelves ; which is exactly the office of the Court of 
 Chancery (and ot the Exchequer) in regard to matters of 
 property. ( c ee back, p. i^S.) The great ufefulnefs of 
 Courts of this kind, has caufed the Courts of Equity in 
 regard to civil matters, to be fupported and continued; 
 but experience has fhewn, as is above obferved, that no 
 effential inconvenience can arife from the Subject being in- 
 dulged with the very great freedom he has acquired by the 
 total abolition of all arbitrary or provisional Courts in re- 
 pard to criminal matters.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 457 
 
 might derive from being fupported by an 
 armed force, or as the above mentioned Author 
 has exprelfed it, from the Sovereign being the 
 General of an army : fuch a rule of acting is 
 even contradictory to the office of a General : 
 the operations of a General eminently depend 
 for their fuccefs, on their being fudden, unfore- 
 feen, attended by furprize. 
 
 In general, that ftability of the power of the 
 Englifh Crown we have defcribed, cannot 
 be the remit of that kind of ftrength 
 which ariics from an armed force : the 
 kind of ftrength which is conferred by fuch 
 a weapon as an army, is too uncertain, too com- 
 plicate, too liable to accidents : in a word, it 
 falls infinitely Ihort of that degree of fteadinefs 
 which is neceffary to counterbalance, and at laft 
 quiet, thofe extenfive agitations in the People 
 which fornetimes feem to threaten the deftruc- 
 tion of order and Government. An army, if 
 its fupport be well directed, may be ufeful to 
 prevent this reftleiThefs in the People from be- 
 ginning to exift ; but it cannot keep it within 
 bounds, when it has once taken place. 
 
 If from general are;uments and confidera- 
 
 CD CD 
 
 tions, we pafs to particular fad:s, we {hall 
 actually find that the Crown, in England, does 
 6
 
 45 8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 not rely for its fupport, nor ever has reliedj, 
 upon the army of which it has the command. 
 From the earlieft times, that is, long before the 
 invention of (landing armies among European 
 Princes, the Kings of England porTefTed an au- 
 thority certainly as full and extenfive as that 
 which they do now enjoy. After the weight 
 they derived from their poflefiions beyond fea 
 had been loft, a certain arrangement of things 
 began to be formed at home, which fupplied 
 them with a ftrength of another kind, though 
 not lefs folid : and they began to derive from 
 the Civil branch of their regal Office that fe- 
 cure power which no other Monarchs had ever 
 pofTeffed, except through the affiftance of Le- 
 gions and Prsetorian guards, or of armies of 
 JanhTaries, or of Strelitzes. 
 
 The Princes of the houfe of Tudor, to fpeak 
 of a very remarkable period in the Englifh 
 Hiftory, though they had no other vifible pre- 
 fent force than inconfiderable retinues of fer- 
 vants, were able to exert a power equal to that 
 of the moft abfolute Monarchs who ever di4 
 reign, equal to that of the Domitians or Com- 
 modufes, or of the Amuraths or Bajazets : 
 nay, it even was fuperior, if we confider the 
 fiow fteadinefs and outward ihow of legality 
 with which it was attended throughout. 
 
 o
 
 OF ENGLAND. 
 
 459 
 
 The ftand which the Kings of the Houfe of 
 Stuart were able to make, though unarmed, 
 and only fupported by the civil authority of 
 their Office, during a long courfe of years, 
 againft the reitlefs fpirit which began to actu- 
 ate the Nation, and the vehement political and 
 religious notions that broke out in their time, 
 is ftill more remarkable than even the exorbi- 
 tant power of the Princes of the Houfe of 
 Tudor, during whofe reign prepoiTefiions of 
 quite a contrary nature were univerfal. 
 
 The Struggle opened with the reign of James 
 the Firft ; yet, he peaceably weathered the be- 
 ginning ftorm, and tranfmitted his authority 
 undiminished to his fon. Charles the Firft was 
 indeed at laft crufhed under the ruins of the 
 Constitution : but if we conlider that, after 
 making the important national conceffions con- 
 tained in the Petition of Right, he was able, Single 
 and unarmed, to maintain his ground without 
 lofs or real danger during a fpace of eleven years, 
 that is, till the year 1640 and thofe that fol- 
 lowed, we fhall be inclined to think that, had 
 he been better advifed, he might have avoided 
 the misfortunes that bcfel him at length. 
 
 Even the events of the reign of James the 
 Second afford a proof of that folidity which is 
 
 7
 
 460 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 annexed to the authority of the Englifh Crown. 
 Notwithstanding the whole Nation, not except- 
 ing the army, were in a manner unanimous 
 againft him, he was able to reign full four 
 years, ftanding fingle againft all, without 
 meeting with any open refiftance. Nor was 
 fuch juftifiable and neceffary refiftance eafily 
 brought about at length (a). Though it is not 
 to be doubted that the dethroning of James the 
 Second would have been effected in the iiTue, 
 and perhaps in a very tragical manner, yet, if 
 it had not been for the affiftance of the Prince 
 of Orange, the event would certainly have been 
 poftponed till a few years later. That autho- 
 rity on which James relied with fo much con- 
 fa) Mr; Hume is rather too anxious in his wifh to ex- 
 culpate James the Second. He begins the conclufive cha- 
 racter he gives of him, with repreienting him as a Prince 
 Kvbo/fi tve may fafely pronounce more unfortunate than criminal. 
 If we confider the folemn engagements entered into, not 
 by his predecefTors only, but by himfelf, which this Prince 
 endeavoured to break, how cool and deliberate his attack 
 on the liberties and religion of the People was, how un- 
 provoked the attempt, and in fhort how totally destitute 
 he was of any plea of i'elf- defence or neceffity, a plea to 
 which moil of the Princes who have been at variance with 
 their Subjects had fome fort of more 01 lefs diftant claim, 
 ive (hall look upon him as being perhaps the guiltieft Mo- 
 narch that ever exifted.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 461 
 
 iidence, was not annihilated at the time it was, 
 otherwife then by a ready and confiderable 
 armed force being brought againft it from the 
 other fide of the Sea, like a folid Fortrefs, which, 
 though without any vifible out-works, requires, 
 in order to be compelled to furrender, to be 
 battered with cannon. 
 
 If we look into the manner in which this 
 Country has been governed fince the Revolu- 
 tion, we mall evidently fee that it has not been 
 by means of the army the Crown has under its 
 command, that it has been able to preferve and 
 exert its authority. It is not by means of their 
 Soldiers that the Kings of Great Britain pre- 
 vent the manner in which elections are carried 
 on, from being hurtful to them ; for, thefe Sol- 
 diers muft move from the places of election one 
 day before fuch elections are begun, and not re- 
 turn till one day after they are finifhed. It 
 is not by means of their military force that 
 they prevent the feveral kinds of civil Magi- 
 ftracics in the Kingdom from invading and lef- 
 fening their prerogative; for this military force 
 is not to act till called for by thefe latter, and 
 under their direction. It is not by means of. 
 their army that they lead the two Branches of 
 theLegiflature into that refpect of their regal au- 
 thority we have before defcribed ; fmce each
 
 462 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 of thefe two Branches, feverally, is pofTeffed with 
 an annual power of difbanding this army (#). 
 
 There is another circum fiance, which, ab- 
 ftractedly of all others, makes it evident that the 
 executive authority of the Crown is not fupport- 
 ed by the army : I mean the very lingular fub- 
 je&ion in which the military is kept in regard 
 to the civil power in this Country. 
 
 In a Country where the governing authority 
 in the State is fupported by the army, the mU 
 litary profeffion, who, in regard to the other 
 profeftions, have on their fide the advantage of 
 prefent force, being now moreover counte- 
 nanced by the law, immediately acquire, or ra- 
 ther alTume, a general afcendency ; and the 
 Sovereign, far from wifhing to difcourage their 
 claims, feels an inward happinefs in feeing 
 that inftrument on which he refts his authority, 
 additionally ftrengthened by the refpedt of the 
 
 {a) The generality of the People have from early times 
 been fo little accuitomed to fee any difpiay of force ufed to 
 influence the debates cf the Parliament, that the attempt 
 made by Charles the Firft to feize the fi<ve Members, at- 
 tended by a retinue of about two hundred Servants, was 
 the a&oal {park that iet in a blaze the heap of combufti- 
 bles which the preceding contefts had accumulated. Th 
 Parliament, from that fact, took a pretence to make mili- 
 tary preparations in their turn ; and then the civil war 
 began.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 463 
 
 People, and receiving a kind of legal fanction 
 from the general outward confent. 
 
 And not only the military profeffion at large, 
 but the individuals belonging to it, alfo claim 
 perfonally a'pre-eminence : chief Commanders, 
 Officers, Soldiers or Janiffaries, all claim in 
 their own fpheres, fome fort of exclufive privi- 
 lege : and thefe privileges, whether of an hono- 
 rific, or of a more fubftantial kind, are violent- 
 ly aflerted, and rendered grievous to the reft of 
 the Community, in proportion as the afiiftance 
 of the military force is more evidently necefifary 
 to, and more frequently employed bv, the Go- 
 vernment. Thefe things cannot be other- 
 wife. 
 
 Now, if we look into the facts that take place 
 in England, we fhall find that a quite different 
 order prevails from what is above defcribed. 
 All Courts of a military kind are under a cori- 
 ftant fubordination to the ordinary Courts of 
 Law. Officers who have abufed their private 
 power, though only in regard to their own Sol- 
 diers, may be called to account before a Court 
 of Common Law, and compelled to make pro- 
 per fatisfadtion. Even any flagrant abuie of 
 authority committed by Members of Courfs 
 Martial, when fitting to judge their cva 
 people, and determine upon cafes of a bare mi-
 
 464 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 litary kind, makes them liable to the animacU 
 verfion of the civil judge (#). 
 
 (a) A great number of inftances might be produced to 
 prove the above mentioned fubjeclion of the Civil to the 
 Military power. I fhall introduce one which is particularly- 
 remarkable : [ meet with it in the periodical publications 
 of the year 1746. 
 
 A Lieutenant of Marines, whofe name was Frye, had 
 been charged, while in the Weft Indies, with contempt of 
 orders, for having refufed, when ordered by the Captain 
 to afiift another Lieutenant in carrying another Officer pri< 
 foner on board the Ship : the two Lieutenants wanted to 
 have the Captain give the order in writing. For this Lieu- 
 tenant Frye was tried at Jamaica by a Court Martial, and 
 fentenced to fifteen years imprifonment, befides being de- 
 clared incapable, of ferving the King. He was brought 
 home ; and his cafe, after being laid before the Privy 
 Council, appearing in a juftinable light, he was releafed. 
 Seme time after he brought an afvion againft Sir Chaloner 
 Ogle, who had fat as Prefident to the above Court Martial, 
 and had a verdict in his favour for one thonfand pounds 
 damages (it was alfo proved that he had been kept four- 
 teen months in the moft fevere confinement before he was 
 brought to his Trial.) The Judge moreover informed him 
 that he was at liberty to bring his action againft any of 
 the Members of the faid Court Martial he could meet with. 
 The following part of the affair is ftill more remarkable. 
 
 Upon application made by Lieutenant Frye, Sir John 
 Willes, Lord Chief Juftice of the Common Pleas, ifi'ued 
 his Writ againft Admiral Mayne, and Captain Renione, two 
 of the perfons who had fat in the above Court Martial, who 
 happened to be at that time in England, and were Mem- 
 bers of the Court Martial that was then fitting at Dept~
 
 O F E N G L A N D, 465 
 
 To the above facts concerning the pre-emi- 
 nence of the Civil over the Military Power at 
 large, it is needlefs to add that all offences corn- 
 ford, to determine on the affair between Admirals Mathews 
 and Leflock, of which Admiral Mayne was moreover Pre* 
 fident ; and they were arretted immediately after the break- 
 ing up of the Court. The other Members refented highly 
 what they thought the infult : they met twice on the fub- 
 jeft ; and came to certain Refolution: , which the Judge Ad- 
 vocate was directed to deliver to the Board of Admiralty, in 
 order to their being laid before the King. In thefe refolu- 
 tions they demanded " fatisfa&ion for the high infult on 
 " their Prefident, from all perfons, how high foever 
 *' in office, who have fet on foot this arrelt, or in any 
 " degree advifed or promoted it :" moreover complaining, 
 that, by the faid arreft, " the order, difcipline, and go- 
 " venment of his Majefty's armies by Sea was diilolved, 
 *' and the Statute 13 Car. II. made null and void." 
 
 The altercations on that account lafted fome months. 
 At length the Court Martial thought it neceffary to fub- 
 mit ; and they fent to Lord Chief Juflice Willes, a letter* 
 figned by the feventeen Officers, Admirals and Comman- 
 ders, who compofed it, in which they acknowledged that 
 * the refolutions of the 16 and 21 May were unjujl and un~ 
 * ' warrantable, and do ajk pardon of his Lordjhip, and the 
 ' whole Court of Common Pleas, for the indignity offered- te 
 * him and the Court," 
 
 This letter Judge Willes read in the open Court, and di 
 reeled the fame to be regiftered in the Remembrance Of- 
 fice, " as a memorial to the prefent and future ages, that 
 whoever fet themfelves above the Law, will, in the end, 
 '' fad themfelves mif alien." The letter from the Court 
 Martial together with Judge Willes 1 ! acceptation, were in- 
 fersed in the next Gazette, 15th November 1746, 
 
 H h
 
 4.66 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 mitted by perfons of the military profeffion, in 
 regard to individuals belonging to the other 
 dalles of the People, are to be determined upon 
 by the Civil Judge. Any uie they may make 
 of their force, unlefs exprefly applied to, and 
 directed, by the Civil Magistrate, let the occa- 
 sion be what it may, makes them liable to be 
 convicted of murder for any life that may have 
 been loft. Pleading the duties or customs of 
 their profeffion in extenuation of any offence, 
 is a plea which the Judge will not fo much as 
 understand. Whenever claimed by the Civil 
 power, they muft be delivered up immediately. 
 Nor can it, in general, be laid, that the coun- 
 tenance fhewn to the military profeffion by 
 the Ruling power in the State, has constant- 
 ly been fuch as to inipire the bulk of the People 
 with a difpofition tamely to bear their acts of 
 oppreffion, or to raife in Magistrates and 
 Juries any degree of pre-posTeffion fufficicnt to 
 lead them always to determine with partiality 
 in their favour (#). 
 
 (a) The Reader may Tee in the publications of the year 
 1770, the clamour that was railed on account of a Genera] 
 in the army ;Gea. Ganfell) having availed himfelf of the 
 vicinity of his Soldiers to prevent certain Sheriff's Officers 
 from executing an arreif upon his perfon, at Whitehall. 
 It however appeared that the General had done nothing 
 more than put forth a few of his Men in order to perplex
 
 OF ENGLAND. 467 
 
 The fubjedtion of the Military to the Civil 
 power, carried to that extent it is in England, 
 is another characteristic and diftinctive circum- 
 ftance in the Englifh Government. 
 
 It is fuiUciently evident that a King does not 
 look to his army for his fupport, who takes fo 
 little pains to bribe and unite it to his in- 
 tereft. 
 
 In general, if we confider all the different 
 circumftances in the Englifh Government, we 
 fhall find that the army cannot poffibly procure 
 to the Soverign any permanent ftrength, any 
 ftrength. upon which he can rely, and from it 
 expect the fuccefs of any future and diftant 
 meafures. 
 
 The public notoriety of the Debates in Par- 
 liament, induces ail individuals, Soldiers as 
 well as others, to pay ibme attention to poli- 
 tical Subjects : and the liberty of fpeakino-, 
 printing, and intriguing, being extended to 
 every order of the Nation by whom they are 
 furrounded makes them liable to imbibe every 
 
 and aftonifh the Sheriff 1 i Officers; and in the mean time 
 he took an opportunity for himfelf to flip cut of the way. 
 The violent clamour we mention was no doubt owino- to 
 the party fruit of the time ; bur it neverthelefs fhew3 
 what the notions of the bulk of the People were on the 
 (ubject. 
 
 H h 2
 
 468 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 notion that may be directly contrary to the views 
 of that Power which keeps them. 
 
 The cafe would be flill worfe if the Sove- 
 reign was engaged in a contefl with a very nu- 
 merous part of the Nation. The general con- 
 cern would increafe in proportion to the vehe- 
 mence of the Parliamentary Debates : Indivi- 
 duals, in all the different claffes of the Public, 
 would try their eloquence on the fame fubjects ; 
 and this eloquence would be in great meafure 
 exerted, during fuch interefting times, in mak- 
 ing converts of the Soldiery : thefe evils the 
 Sovereign could not obviate, nor even know, 
 till it fnould be in every refpedfc too late. A 
 Prince engaged in the contefl we fuppofe, would 
 fcarcely have completed his fir ft preparations, 
 his project would fcarcely be half ripe for 
 execution, before his army would be taken 
 from him. And the more powerful this army 
 might be, the more adequate, feemingly, from 
 its numbers, to the tafk it is intended for, the 
 more open it would be to the danger we men- 
 tion. 
 
 Of this, James the Second made a very re- 
 markable experiment. He had augmented his 
 army to the number of thirty thoufand. But 
 when the day finally came in which their fup- 
 port was to have been ufeful to him, fome defert- 
 cdto the enemy; others threw down their arms j
 
 OF ENGLAND. 469 
 
 and thofe who contiuned to ftand together, 
 fhewed more inclination to be Spectators of, 
 than agents in, the conteft. In fhort, he gave 
 all over for loft, without making any manner of 
 trial of their affiftance (a), 
 
 (a) The army made loud rejoicings on the day of the 
 acquittal of the Bijhops, even in tha prefence of the King, 
 who had purpofecily repaired to Hounflow Heath on that 
 day. He had not been able to bring a fingle regimeut to 
 declare an approbation of his meafures in regard to the 
 Teft and penal Statutes. The celebrated ballad lero lero 
 Ullibulero, which is reported to have had fuch an influence 
 on the minds of the peop 1 ^ at that time, and of which 
 Bifhop Burnet fays, " never perhaps fo Jlight a thing had fo 
 " great an effect"'' originated in the army : " the whole army, 
 " and at laji People both in City and Country, tvere perpetually 
 
 " J*"g' n g *'" 
 
 To a King of England engaged in a project againft 
 public liberty, a numerous army, ready formed before 
 hand, mull, in the prefent fituation of things, prove a very 
 great impediment ; he cannot pufiibly give his attention to 
 the proper management of it : the lefs fo, as his meafures 
 for that purpofe mult often be contradictory to thofe he is 
 to purfue with the reft of the People. 
 
 If a King of England, wiihing to fet afide the prefent 
 Conftitution, and to aifimilate his power to that of the 
 other Sovereigns of Europe, was to do me the honour to 
 coniult me as to the means of obtaining fuccefs, I would 
 recommend to him, as his fir ft preparatory ftep, and before 
 his real project is even fufpefted, to difbind his army, 
 keeping only a ftrong guard, not exceeding twelve hundred 
 Men. This done, he might, by means of the weight and 
 advantages of his place, fet himfelf about undermining fuch 
 
 Hh 3
 
 47 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 From all the fads before introduced, it is 
 evident that the power of the Crown, in Eng- 
 land, bears upon foundations that are quite pe- 
 culiar to it, and that its lecurity and itrength 
 are obtained by means totally different from 
 thofe by which the fame advantages are lb in- 
 completely procured, and lb deeply payed for in 
 other Countries. 
 
 it is without the affiftance of an armed force 
 that the Crown, in England, is able to mani- 
 feft that fearlciiheis of particular individuals, 
 or whole dalles of them, with which it dif- 
 charges its le^al functions and duties. It is 
 without the affiilance ot an armed lorce, it is 
 
 conflitutional laws as he didlkes ; unrig as much temper 
 as he cm, that he may have the more rims to proceed. 
 And when at leng;h things fnculd be brought to a crifis, 
 then I would advife him to form another army, out of 
 thofe f iends or clafs of the People whom the turn and 
 incidents of the p:ececing conceits, will have linked and 
 rivetted to his interefl : with this army he might now take 
 hi* chance: the veil would depend on his generalfhip : 
 and even in a great meafure on his bare reputation in that 
 refpeff. 
 
 This advice to the King of England I fuppofe; I would, 
 however conclude With obferving to him, that his fituation 
 is as advantageous to the full, as that of any King upon 
 earth, ai d upon the whole, that all the advantages that 
 can pofiibly aiiie from the fuccefs of his plan, cannot make 
 jt worth his while to undertake it.
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 471 
 
 able to counterbalance the exteniive and nnre- 
 llrained freedom of the People, it is able to ex- 
 ert that refilling ftrength which conftantly keeps 
 increasing in a fuperior proportion to the force 
 by which it is oppofed, that ballafting power 
 by which, in the midft of boifterous winds and 
 gales, it recovers and rights again the Veffel of 
 the State (V). 
 
 It is from the Civil branch of its Office, the 
 Crown derives that ftrength by which it fub- 
 dues even the Military power, and keeps it 
 in a ftate of fubjecYion to the Laws, unexampled 
 in any other Country. It is from an happy ar- 
 rangement of things it derives that uninter- 
 rupced fteadinefs, that invifible folidity, which 
 procures to the Subject both lb certain a pro- 
 tection, and fo extenfive a freedom. It is from 
 the Nation it receives the force with which it 
 
 (a) There is a number of circumflances in the Englifh 
 Government: which thofe perfons who w.fn for fpeculative 
 meliorations, fuch as Parliamentary reform, or other changes 
 of a like kind, do not perhaps think ot taking into con- 
 sideration, If fo, they are, in their proceedings, in danger 
 of meddling with a number of firings, the exigence of 
 which they do not lufpect. While they only mean refor- 
 mation and improvement, they are in danger of removing 
 the Talifman on which the exiftence of the Fabrick depends, 
 or, like King Nifus's daughter, of cutting off the fatal hair 
 with which the fate of the city is connected. 
 
 H h 4
 
 472 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 governs the Nation. Its refources are, accord., 
 and not compulfion,- free action, and not fear, 
 and it continues to reign through the play, the 
 itruggle, of the voluntary paflions of thofe who 
 pay obedience to it (a). 
 
 CHAP. XVIII. 
 
 How far the examples of Nations who have loft their 
 liberty, are applicable to England. 
 
 EVERY Government, thofe Writers obferve 
 who have treated thefe fubjects, contain- 
 ing within itfelf the efficient caufe of its ruin, 
 a caufe which is efTentially connected with thofe 
 very circumstances that had produced its prof- 
 perity, the advantages attending the Englifh 
 Government cannot therefore, according to thefe 
 Writers, exempt it from that hidden defect 
 which is fecretly working its ruin ; and M. de 
 Montefquieu, giving his opinion both on the 
 effect and the caufe, fays, the Englifh 
 Conftitution will lofe its liberty, will perifh : 
 
 (a) Many perfons, fatisfied with feeing the elevation and 
 upper parts of a building, thir.k it immaterial to give a look 
 under ground, and notice the foundation. Thofe Readers 
 therefore v. ho choofe, may confider the long Chapter that 
 has juft been concluded, as a kind of foreign digreflion, 
 pr parenthefis, in the courfe of the Work,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 473 
 
 f c Have not Rome, Lacedsmon, and Car- 
 " thage, perimed ? It will perifh when the 
 " Legiflative power mall have become more 
 " corrupt than the Executive." 
 
 Though I do by no means pretend that 
 any human eftablrfhment can efcape the fate 
 to which we fee every thing in Nature is fub- 
 jed:, nor am fo far prejudiced by the fenfe I 
 entertain of the great advantages of the Eng- 
 lifh Government, as to reckon amono- them 
 that of eternity ; I will however obferve in ge- 
 neral, that, as it differs by its ftructure and re- 
 fources from all thofe with which Hiftory 
 makes us acquainted, fo it cannot be faid to be 
 liable to the fame dangers. To judge of the 
 one from the other, is to judge by analogy 
 where no analogy is to be found ; and my re- 
 fpect for the author I have quoted will not 
 hinder me from faying, th2t his opinion has not 
 the fame weight with me on this occafion, that 
 it has on many others. 
 
 Having neglected, as indeed all fyflematic 
 Writers upon Politics have done, very at- 
 tentively to enquire into the real foundations 
 of Power, and of Government, among Man- 
 kind, the principles he lays down are not 
 always fo clear, or even fo juft, as we might
 
 474 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 have expedted from a Man of fo true a genius. 
 When he fpeaks of England, for infhnce, his 
 obfervations are much too general : and though 
 he had frequent opportunities of converting 
 with Men who had been perfonally concerned 
 in the public affairs of this Country, and he 
 had been himfelf an eye-witnefs of the opera- 
 tions of the Englifh Government, yet, when he 
 attempts to defcribe it, he rather tells us what he 
 conjectured than what he faw. 
 
 The examples he quotes, and the caufes of 
 diffolution which he aiTigns, particularly con- 
 firm this obfervation. The Government of 
 Rome, to fpeak of the one which, having gra- 
 dually, and as it were of itfelf, fallen to ruin, 
 may afford matter for exact reafoning, had no 
 relation to that of England. The Roman 
 People were nor, in the latter ages of the Com- 
 monwealth, a People of Citizens, but of Con- 
 querors. Rome was not a State, but the head 
 of a State. By the immenrky of its conquefis, 
 it came in time to be in a manner only an ac- 
 cefTory part of its own Empire. Its power be- 
 came fo great, that, after having conferred it, it 
 was at length no longer able to refume it : and 
 from that moment it became itfelf fubje<ftcd to 
 it, from the fame reafon that the Provinces them- 
 felves were fo. 5
 
 OF ENGLAND. 475 
 
 The fall of Rome, therefore, was an event 
 peculiar to its fituation ; and the change of 
 manners which accelerated this fall, had alfo an 
 effect which it could not have had but in that 
 fame fituation. Men who had drawn to them- 
 felves all the riches of the World, could no lon- 
 ger content themfelves with the fupper of Fa- 
 bricius, and the cottage of Cicinnatus. The 
 People, who were matters of all the corn of 
 Sicily and Africa, were no longer obliged to 
 plunder their neighbours for their's. All poffi- 
 ble Enemies, befides, being exterminated, 
 Rome, whofe power was military, became to be 
 no longer an army ; and that was the asra of her 
 corruption ; if, indeed, we ought to give that 
 name to what was the inevitable coniequence 
 of the nature of things. 
 
 In a word, Rome was deftined to lofe her Li- 
 berty when Hie loft her Empire, and fhe was 
 deftined to lofe her Empire, whenever fhe 
 mould begin to enjoy it. 
 
 But England forms a Society founded upon 
 principles absolutely different. All liberty, 
 and power are not accumulated as it were 
 on one point, fo as to leave, every where 
 elfe, only flavery and mifery, confequently 
 only feeds of divifion and fecret animofity. 
 From the one end of the iftand to the other
 
 476 T HE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the fame laws take place, and the fame intercfts 
 prevail : the whole Nation, befides, equally 
 concurs in the formation of the Government : 
 no part, therefore, has caufe to fear that the 
 other parts will fuddenly fupply the neceffary 
 forces to deftroy its liberty; and the whole have, 
 of courfe, no occafion for thofe ferocious kinds 
 of virtue which are indifpenfibly neceifary to 
 thofe who, from the fituation in which they have 
 brought themfelves, are continually expofed to 
 fuch dangers, and after having invaded every 
 thing, mufl abilain from every thing. 
 
 The fituation of the People of England, 
 therefore, effentially differs from that of the 
 People of Rome. The form of the Englifh 
 Government does not differ lefs from that of the 
 Roman Republic : and the great advantages it 
 has over the latter for preferving the liberty of 
 the People from ruin, have been defcribed at 
 length in the courfe of this Work. 
 
 Thus, for inftance, the total ruin of the Ro- 
 man Republic was principally brought about 
 by the exorbitant power to which feveral of its 
 Citizens were fucceffively enabled to rife. In 
 the latter age of the Commonwealth, thofe Ci- 
 tizens went lb far as to divide among them- 
 felves the dominions of the Republic, in much 
 the fame manner as they might have done lands
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 477 
 
 of their own. And to them, others in a ftiort 
 time fucceeded, who not only did the fame, 
 but who even proceeded to that degree of ty- 
 rannical infolence, as to make ceffions to each 
 other, by exprefs and formal compacts, of the 
 lives of thoufands of their Fellow-citizens. 
 But the great and conftant authority and weight 
 of the Crown, in England, prevent, in their 
 yery beginning, as we have feen, all misfortunes 
 of this kind ; and the reader may recollect what 
 has been faid before on that fubjedh 
 
 At lad the ruin of the Republic, as every 
 one knows, was completed. One of thofe 
 powerful Citizens we mention, in procefs of 
 time found means to exterminate all his com- 
 petitors : he immediately affumed to himfelf 
 the whole power of the State ; and eftublifhed 
 for ever after an arbi'rary Monarchy. But 
 fuch a fudden and violent eftablifhment of a 
 Monarchical power, with all the fatal confe- 
 quences that would refult from fuch an event, 
 are calamities which cannot take place in Eng- 
 land ; that fame kind of power we fee, is already 
 in being ; it is afcertained by fixed laws, 
 and eftablifhed upon regular and well-known 
 foundations. 
 
 Nor is there any great danger that that 
 power may, by means of thofe legal prero-
 
 47$ THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 gatives it already pofTefTes, fuddenly afTumc.. 
 others, and at laft openly make itfelf abiblute. 
 The important privilege of granting to the 
 Crown its neceffary fupplies, we have before 
 obferved, is veiled in the Nation : and how ex- 
 tensive foever the prerogatives of a King of 
 England may be, it conftantly lies in the power 
 of his People either to grant, or deny him, the 
 means of exercifing them. 
 
 This right pofieffed by the People of Eng- 
 land, conftitutes the great difference between 
 them, and all the other Nations that live under 
 Monarchical Governments. It likewife gives 
 them a great advantage over fuch as are formed 
 into Republican States, and confers on them a 
 means of influencing the conduct of the Go- 
 vernment, not only more effectual, but alfo 
 (which is more in point to the fubjedt of this 
 Chapter) incomparably more lafling and fecure 
 than thofe referved to the People, in the States 
 we mention. 
 
 In thofe States, the political rights which 
 ufually fall to the fhare of the People, are 
 thofe of voting in general Aflemblies, either 
 when laws are to be enacted, or Magi Urates 
 to be elected. But as the advantages arifing 
 from thefe general rights of giving votes 2
 
 OF ENGLAND. 479 
 
 are never very clearly afcertained by the gene- 
 rality of the People, fo neither are the confe- 
 quences attending particular forms or modes of 
 giving theie votes, generally and completely 
 underftood. They accordingly never enter- 
 tain any fttong and conftant preference for one 
 method rather than another ; and it hence al- 
 ways proves but too eafy a thing in Republican 
 States, either by infidious propofals made 
 at particular times to the People, or by well- 
 contrived precedents, or other means, firfi: to 
 reduce their political privileges to mere cere- 
 monies and forms, and at laft, entirely to abolifli 
 them. 
 
 Thus, in the Roman Republic, the mode 
 which was conflantly in uie for about one 
 hundred and fifty years, of dividing the Ci- 
 tizens into Centur'ue when they gave their 
 votes, reduced the right of the greater part 
 of them, during that time, to little more 
 than a fhadow. After the mode of dividing: 
 them by Tribes had been introduced by the 
 Tribunes, the bulk of the Citizens indeed 
 were not, when it was ufed, under fo great 
 a difadvantage as before ; but yet the great 
 privileges exercifed by the Magiftrates in ail 
 the public afiemblies, the power they ailumed 
 of moving the Citizens cut of one Tribe into
 
 4 So THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 another, and a number of other circumftances, 
 continued to render the rights of the Citizens 
 more and more ineffectual ; and in fadl we do 
 not find that when thofe rights were at laft en- 
 tirely taken from them, they expreffed any 
 very great degree of difcontent. 
 
 In Sweden (the former Government of 
 which paitook much of the Republican form) 
 the right allotted to the People in the Govern- 
 ment, was that of fending Deputies to the 
 General States of the Kingdom, who were to 
 give their votes on the refolutions that were to 
 be taken in that Affembly. But the privilege 
 of the People of fending fuch Deputies was, 
 in the firft. place, greatly diminifhed by feveral 
 effential difadvantages under which thefe De- 
 puties were placed with refpecl to the body, 
 or Order, of the Nobles. The fame pri- 
 vilege of the People was farther leffened by 
 their Deputies being deprived of the right of 
 freely laying their different propofals before 
 the States, for their affent or diffent, and attri- 
 buting the exciufive right of framing fuch 
 propofals, to a private Affembly which was 
 called the Secret Committee. Again, the right 
 allowed to the Order of the Nobles, of having 
 a number of Members in this Secret Com- 
 mittee double to that of all the other Or-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 4 3i 
 
 ders taken together, rendered the rights of 
 the People dill more ineffectual. At the laft 
 Revolution thofe rights we mention have been 
 in a manner taken from the People ; and they 
 do not feem to have made any great efforts to 
 preferve them (#). 
 
 But the fituation of affairs in England is to- 
 tally different from that which we have juft 
 defcribed. The political rights of the People 
 are infeparably connected with the right of 
 Property with a right which it is as difficult 
 to invalidate by artifice, as it is dangerous to at- 
 tack it by force, and which we fee that the 
 mod arbitrary Kings, in the full career of 
 their power, have never offered to violate with- 
 out the greateft precautions. A King of Eng- 
 land who would enflave his People, muft be- 
 gin with doing, for his firft act, what all other 
 Kings referve for the laft; and he cannot at- 
 tempt to deprive his Subjects of their political 
 privileges, without declaring war againft the 
 whole Nation at the fame time, and attacking 
 
 (a) I might have produced examples of a number of 
 Republican States in which the People have been brought, 
 at one time or other, to fubmit to the lofs of their political 
 privileges. In the Venetian Republic, for inftance, the 
 right, now exclufively vefted in a certain number of fa- 
 milies, of enabling laws, and electing the Doge and other 
 Magistrates, was originally vefted in the whole People, 
 
 I i
 
 482 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 every individual at once in his moft permanent 
 and belt understood intereft. 
 
 And that means poffefTed by the People of 
 England, of influencing the conduit of the 
 Government, is not only in a manner fecure 
 againft any danger of being taken from them : 
 it is moreover attended with another advan- 
 tage of the greateft importance; which is that 
 of conferring naturally, and as it were necef- 
 farily, on thofe to whom they truft the care 
 of their interests, the great privilege we have 
 before defcribed, of debatinc; amonp- themfelves 
 whatever queftions they think conducive to the 
 good of their Condiments, and of framing 
 whatever bills they think proper, and in what 
 terms they choofe. 
 
 This privilege of ftarting new fubjedts of de- 
 liberation, and, in fhort, of propounding in the 
 bufinefs of lepiflation, which, in England, 
 is allotted to the Reprefentatives of the 
 People, fets another capital difference between 
 the Englifh Conflitution, and the government of 
 other free States, whether limited Monarchies 
 or Commonwealths, and prevents that which, 
 in thofe States, proves a molt effectual means 
 of fubverting the laws favourable to public li- 
 berty : I mean the undermining of thefe laws 
 by the precedents and artful practices of thofe 
 who are inverted with the Executive Power in 
 the Government.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 483 
 
 In the States we mention, the aftive fhare, or 
 the bufinefs of propounding, in legislation, being 
 ever allotted to thofe perfons who are inverted 
 with the Executive authority, they not only pof- 
 fefs a general power, by means of invidious and 
 well timed propofals made to the People, of 
 getting thofe laws repealed which fet bounds 
 to their authority ; but when they do not choofe 
 openly to difcover their willies in that refpect, 
 or perhaps even fear to fail in the attempt, they 
 have another refource, which, though flower 
 in its operation, is not lefs effectual in the ifTue. 
 They neglect to exeeute thofe laws which they 
 diflike, or deny the benefit of them to the fe- 
 parate ftraggling individuals who claim them, 
 and in ihort introduce practices that are directly 
 derogatory to them. Thefe practices in a 
 courfe of time become refpectable Ufes, and at 
 length obtain the force of Laws, 
 
 The People, even where they are allowed a 
 fliare in legiflation, being ever pajfwe in the ex- 
 ercife of it, have no opportunities of framing 
 new provifions by which to remove thefe fpu- 
 rious practices or regulations, and declare what 
 the law in reality is. The only refource of the 
 Citizens, in fuch a flate of things, is either to 
 be perpetually cavilling, or openly to oppofe : 
 and always exerting themfelves, either too foon, 
 or too latCj they cannot come forth to defend 
 
 Ii 2
 
 4 84 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 their liberty, without incurring the charge, ei- 
 'ther of difaifettion, or of rebellion. 
 
 And while the whole clafs of Politicians, who 
 are conftantly alluding to the ufual forms of 
 limited Governments, agree in deciding that 
 freedom, when once loft, cannot be reco- 
 vered (a), it happens that the maxim principlh- 
 objla, which they look upon as the fafeguard of 
 liberty, and which they accordingly never ceafe 
 to recommend, befides its requiring a degree 
 of watchfulnefs incompatible with the fituation 
 of the People, is in a manner impracticable.- 
 
 But the operation of preferring grievances* 
 which in other Governments is a conftant fore- 
 runner of public commotions, that of framing 
 new law remedies, which is fo jealouOy fecured 
 to the Ruling power of the State, arc, in Eng- 
 land, the conftitutional and appropriated offices 
 of the Reprefentatives of the People. 
 
 How long foever the People may have re- 
 mained in a (late of fupinenefs as to their moil 
 valuable interefrs, whatever may have bed: 
 the neglect and even the errors of their Re- 
 prefentatives, the inftant the latter come either 
 to fee thefe errors, or to have a fenfe of their 
 duty, they proceed, by means of the privilege 
 
 () " Ye free Nations, remember this maxim : Free- 
 dom may be acquired, but it cannot be recovered^' 
 KiuJ/ims Social Compad, Chap. VIII. 
 
 < ,j
 
 OF ENGLAND, 4?S 
 
 we mention, to fet afide thofe abufes or prac- 
 tices which, during the preceding years, had 
 become to hold the place of the laws. To 
 how low ibever a ftate public liberty mav happen 
 to be reduced, they take it where they find it, 
 lead it back through the fame path, and to the 
 fame point, from which it had been compelled 
 to retreat ; and the ruling power, whatever its 
 lifurpations may have been, how far ibever it 
 may have overflowed : ls banks, is ever brought 
 back to its old limits. 
 
 To the exertions of the privilege we men^ 
 tion, were owing the frequent confirmations 
 and elucidations of the Great Charter that took 
 place in different reigns. By means of the 
 fame privilege the Act was repealed, without 
 public commotion, which had enacted that the 
 King's proclamations mould have the force of 
 law : by this Act public liberty feemed to 
 be irretrievably loft ; and the Parliament who 
 palfed it, feemed to have done what the Danifh 
 Nation did about a century afterwards. The 
 fame privilege procured the peaceable abolition 
 of the Court of Star Chamber : a Court which, 
 though in itfelf illegal, had grown to be lb re* 
 fpecled through the length of time it had been 
 fuffered to exift, that it feemed to have for ever- 
 
 li 3
 
 486 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 fixed and rivetted the unlawful authority it 
 conferred on the Crown. By the fame means 
 the power was fet afide which the Privy Coun- 
 cil had affumed of imprifoning the Subject 
 without admitting to bail, and even mentioning 
 any caufe : this power was in the firft inftance 
 declared illegal by the Petition of Right ; and 
 the attempts of both the Crown and the Judges 
 to invalidate this declaration by introducing, or 
 maintaining, practices that were derogatory to 
 it, were as often obviated, in a peaceable manr 
 ner, by frefh declarations, and, in the end, by 
 the celebrated Habeas Corpus Act (<z), 
 
 (a) The cafe of the General Warrants may alfo be 
 mentioned as an inftance. The iffuing of fuch Warrants, 
 with the name of the perfons to be arrefted left blank, 
 was a praclice that had been followed in the Secretaries of 
 State's office for above fixty years. In a Government 
 differently conilituted, that is, in a Goverrment in which 
 the Magiftrates, or Executive Power, fliould have been 
 poffefTed of the Key of Legiflation, it is difficult to fay how 
 the conteft might have been terminated : thefe Magiftrates 
 would have been but indifferently inclined to frame and 
 bring forth a declaration by which to abridge their affumed 
 authority. In the Republic 01 Geneva, the Magiftracy, 
 inftead of refcinding the judgment againft M. Rouffeau, of 
 which the Citizens complained, bad rather openly to avow 
 the maxim, that Handing TJfes were valid derogations to 
 the written Law, and ought to fuperfede it. This rendered 
 the clamour more violent than before.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 487 
 
 And I ihall take this opportunity to make 
 the Reader obferve, in general, how the Dif- 
 ferent parts of the Englifh Government mu- 
 tually amft and fupport each other. It is be- 
 caufe the whole executive authority in the 
 State is veiled in the Crown, that the People 
 may without danger delegate the care of their 
 liberty to Reprefenr/itives : it is becaufe they 
 mare in the Government only through thefe 
 Reprefentatives, that they are enabled to poffefs 
 the great advantage ariling from framing and 
 propofing new laws : but for this purpofe, it is 
 again abfolutely necefTary that the Crozvn, tnat 
 is to fay, a Veto of extraordinary power, fhould 
 exift in the State. 
 
 It is, on the other hand, becaufe the balance 
 of the People is placed in the right of granting 
 to the Crown its neceffary fupplies, that the 
 latter may, without danger, be intrufled with 
 the great authority we mention ; and that the 
 right, for inftance, which is vefted in it of 
 judging of the proper time for calling and dif- 
 folving Parliaments (a right abfolutely necef- 
 fary to its prefervation) may exiit without pro- 
 ducing ipfo farJo, the ruin of public Liberty. 
 The mod lingular Government upon Earth, and 
 which has carried fartheft the liberty of the in- 
 
 u 4
 
 48S THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 dividual, was in danger of total deftru&ion, 
 when Bartholomew Columbus was on his paf- 
 fage to England, to teach Henry the Seventh 
 the way to Mexico and Peru (a). 
 
 As a conclufion of this fubject (which might 
 open a field for fpeculations without end) 
 I fhall take notice of an advantage peculiar to 
 the Englim Government, and which, more 
 than any other we could mention, mull: con- 
 tribute to its duration. Ail the political paf- 
 fions of Mankind, if we attend to it, are fatis- 
 fied and provided for in the Englim Govern- 
 ment; and whether we look at the Monarchical, 
 or the Ariflocratical, or the Democratical part 
 of it, we find all thofe powers already fettled 
 in it in a regular manner, which have an un- 
 avoidable tendency to arife at one time or other, 
 in all human Societies. 
 
 If we could for an inftant fnppofe that the 
 Englifh form of Government, inftcad of hav- 
 ing been the effecl: of a lucky concurrence of 
 fortunate circumftances, had been eilablifhed 
 from a fettled plan by a Man who had dif- 
 covered, beforehand and by reaibning, all thofe 
 
 (a) As affairs are fituated in England, the diffolution 
 of a Parliament on the part of the Crown, is no more 
 than an appeal either to the People themfelves, or to 
 another Parliament.
 
 OFENGLAND. 489 
 
 advantages refulting from it which we now per- 
 ceive from experience, and had undertaken to 
 point them out to other Men capable of judg* 
 ing of what he faid to them, the following is, 
 moft likely, the manner in which he would 
 have expretfed himfelf. 
 
 ' Nothing is more chimerical, he would have 
 ' laid, than a flate either of total equality, or 
 
 * total liberty, amongft Mankind. In all fo- 
 ' cieties of Men, fome Power will neceifarily 
 ' arife. This Power, after gradually becoming 
 
 * confined to a fmaller number of perfons, will, 
 
 * by a like necefiity, at laft fall into the hands 
 ' of a fingle Leader; and thefe two effects (of 
 f which you may fee conftant examples in Hif- 
 ' tory) arifing from the ambition of the one 
 ' part of Mankind, and from the various affec- 
 ' tions and paffions of the other, are abfolutely 
 1 unavoidable. 
 
 6 Let us, therefore, admit this evil at once, 
 6 lince it is impoffible to avoid it. Let us, of 
 ' ourfelves, eftabliih a Chief among us, fince 
 ' we mull, fome time or other, fubmit to one : 
 
 * we fhall by this means effectually prevent 
 
 * the conflicts that would arife among the 
 < competitors for that ftation. But let us, 
 above all, eftablifh him fingle ; left, after 
 f fucceflively railing himfelf on the ruins of
 
 490 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 c his Rivals, he mould finally eftablifh himfelf 
 f whether we will or not, and through a train 
 
 * of the moft difadvantageous incidents. 
 
 c Let us even give him every thing we can 
 
 * pofiibly give without endangering our fe- 
 f curity. Let us call him our Sovereign; let 
 
 * us make him confider the State as being; his 
 
 < own patrimony ; let us grant him, in fhort, 
 s fuch perfonal privileges as none of us can 
 c ever hope to rival him in, and we fhall find 
 f thofe things which we were at firft inclined 
 6 to confider as a great evil, will be in reality 
 c a fource of advantages to the Community. 
 ( We fhall be the better able to fet bounds to 
 c that Power which we fhall have thus afcer- 
 ' tained and fixed in one place. We fhall have 
 the more interefled the Man whom we fhall 
 ' have put in poffemon of lb many advantages, 
 ' in the faithful difcharge of his duty. And we 
 
 * fhall have thus procured for each of us, a 
 c powerful prote&or at home, and for the 
 c whole Community, a defender againft foreign 
 c enemies, fupcrior to all poffible temptation 
 
 * of betraying his Country. 
 
 c You may alio have obferved (he would 
 
 < continue), that in all States, there naturally 
 
 < arifes around the perfon, or perfons, who are 
 in veiled with the public power, a clafs of
 
 OF ENGLAND, 491 
 
 ( Men, who, without having any actual fhare 
 c in that power, yet partake of its luftre : who, 
 c pretending to be diilinguiihed from the reft 
 f ot the Community, do from that very cir- 
 c cumftance, become diilinguiihed from it ; 
 c and this diilinction, though only matter of 
 f opinion, and at firfl thus furreptitiouily ob- 
 ( tained, yet may become in time the fource of 
 ' very grievous effect's. 
 
 c Let us therefore regulate this evil which 
 c we cannot entirely prevent. Let us eflablifh 
 c this clifs of Men who would otherwife grow 
 ' up among us without our knowledge, and 
 f gradually acquire the moil pernicious privi- 
 t leges. Let us grant them diflinclions that are 
 1 viiible and clearly afcertnined : their nature 
 c will by this means, be the better underflood, 
 ' and they will of courfe, be much lefs likely 
 c to become dangerous. By this means alfo, 
 ( we fhall preclude all other perfons from the 
 ( hopes or ufurping them. As, to pretend to 
 6 diftinttions can thenceforward be no lono-er 
 
 o 
 
 * a title to obtain them, every one who fhall 
 ( not be exprefsly included in their number, 
 c muft continue to confefs himfelf one of the 
 
 * People ; and jufl as we faid before, let us 
 choofe ourfelves one Mailer that we may not 
 have fifty, fo let us again fay here, let us
 
 4$z THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 i eftablifh three hundred Lords, that we may 
 ' not have ten thouiand Nobles. 
 
 ' Befides, our pride will better reconcile 
 e itfelf to a fuperiority which it will no longer 
 
 * think of disputing. Nay, as they will them- 
 f felves fee us to be beforehand in acknow- 
 
 * ledging it, they will think themfelves under 
 ' no neceffity of being infolent to furnifh us a 
 ' proof of it. Secure as to their privileges, ail 
 ' violent meafures on their part for main- 
 ( taining, and at laft perhaps extending them, 
 ' will be prevented : they will never combine 
 c together with any degree of vehemence, but 
 c when they really have caufe to think them- 
 4 felves in danger; and by having made them 
 
 * indifputably great Men, we mall have a chance 
 4 of often feeing them behave like modeft and 
 
 * virtuous Citizens. 
 
 * In fine, by being united in a regular Af- 
 
 * fembly, they will form an intermediate Body 
 
 * in the State, that is to fay, a very ufeful part 
 
 * of the Government. 
 
 c It is alfo neceffary, our Lawgiver would 
 1 farther add, that We, the People, fhould 
 1 have an influence upon Government : it is 
 1 neceffary for our own fecurity ; it is no 
 ' lefs neceffary for the fecurity of the Govern- 
 ' ment itfelf. But experience muff have 
 < taught you, at the fame time, that a great
 
 OF ENGLAND. 493 
 
 * body of Men cannot act, without being, 
 ' though they are not aware of it, the inllru- 
 ' ments of the defigns of a fmall number 
 c of perfons; and that the power of the Pco- 
 ' pie is never any thing but the power of a 
 e few Leaders, who (though it may be impof- 
 ' fible to tell when or how) have found means 
 ( to fecure to themfclves the direction of its 
 
 * exercife. 
 
 ' Let us, therefore, be alfo beforehand with 
 ' this other inconvenience. Let us effect 
 ' openly what would, otherwife, take place 
 ' in fecret. Let us intruft our power, before 
 ' it be taken from us by addrefs. Thole whom 
 ' we fhall have exprefsly made the depcfitaries 
 ' of it, being freed from any anxious care 
 ' about fupporting themfelves, will have no 
 
 * object but to render it ufeful. They will 
 
 * Hand in awe of us the more, becaufe they 
 ' will know that they have not impofed upon 
 ' us : and inftead of a fmall number of Leaders, 
 ' who would imagine they derive their whole 
 ' importance from their own dexterity, we 
 ' ihall have exprefs and acknowledged Re- 
 ' prefentatives, who will be accountable to us 
 
 * for the evils of the State. 
 
 ( But above all, by forming our Govern- 
 
 * ment with a fmall number of perfons, we mall 
 
 3
 
 494 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ' prevent any diforder that may take place iii 
 ' it, from ever becoming dangeroufly exten- 
 ' five. Nay more, we fhall render it capable 
 * of ineftimable combinations and refources, 
 c which would be utterly impoffible in that 
 ' Government of all, which never can be any 
 ' thing but uproar and confufion. 
 
 c In Ihort, by exprefsly divefting ourfelves 
 ' of a power of which we mould, at beft, 
 c have only an apparent enjoyment, we fhall 
 c be entitled to make conditions for ourfelves : 
 ' we will infift that out liberty be augmented ; 
 ' we will, above all, referve to ourfelves the 
 c right of watching and cenfuring that admi- 
 c niftration which will have been eftablifhed 
 < by our own confent. We fhall the better 
 1 fee its faults, becaufe we fhall be only Spefta- 
 e tors of it; we fhall correct them the better, 
 c becaufe we fhall not have perfonally concurred 
 ' in its operations (a).' 
 
 (a) He might have added, " As we will not feek 
 ' to counteract nature, but rather to follow it, we fhall 
 " be able to procure ourfelves a mild Legiflation. 
 " Let us not be without caufe afraid of the power of 
 " one Man ; we ihall have no need either of a Tarpeian 
 " rock, or of a Council of Ten. Having exprefily 
 " allowed to the People a liberty to enquire into the 
 conduct of Government, and to endeavour to cor- 
 reft it, we fhall need neither State-prifons, nor fecret 
 (t Informers."
 
 OF ENGLAND. 493 
 
 The Englim Constitution being founded upon 
 fuch principles as thofe we have juft defcribed, 
 no true companion can be made between it, 
 and the Governments of any other States ; 
 and fince it evidently infures, not only the li- 
 berty, but the general fatisfadtion in all re- 
 fpedts, of thofe who are fubjed: to it, in a much 
 greater degree than any other Government 
 ever did, this consideration alone affords fuf- 
 ficient ground to conclude, without looking 
 farther, that it is alio more likely to be pre- 
 ierved from ruin. 
 
 And indeed we may obferve the remarkable 
 manner in which it has been maintained in the 
 midft of fuch general commotions as feemed 
 unavoidably to prepare its destruction. It rofe 
 again, we fee, after the wars between Henry 
 the Third and his Barons; after the ufurpation 
 of Henry the Fourth ; and after the long and 
 bloody contentions between the Houfes of 
 York and Lancaster. Nay, though totally 
 destroyed in appearance after the fall of 
 Charles the Firft, and though the greateft ef- 
 forts had been made to eftablifli another form 
 of government in its (lead, yet, no fooner was 
 Charles the Second called over, than the Con- 
 ftitution was re-eftablifhed upon all its ancient 
 foundations.
 
 49$ THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 However, as what has not happened at 
 one time, may happen at another, future 
 Revolutions (events which no form of Go- 4 
 vernment can totally prevent) may perhaps 
 end in a different manner from that in which 
 pad ones have been terminated. New com- 
 binations may poffibly take place among the 
 then ruling Powers of the State, of fuch a 
 nature as to prevent the Conftitution, when 
 peace fhall be reftored to the Nation, from fet- 
 tling again upon its ancient and genuine foun- 
 dations ; and it would certainly be a very bold 
 ailertion to decide, that both the outward 
 form, and the true fpirit of the Englifh Go- 
 vernment, would again be preferved from 
 deftruftion, if the fame dangers to which they 
 have in former times been expofed, fhould 
 again happen to take place. 
 
 Nay, fuch fatal changes as thofe we men- 
 tion, may be introduced even in quiet times, or 
 at leaft, by means in appearance peaceable and 
 conftitutional. Advantages, for inftance, may 
 be taken by particular factions, either of the 
 feeble temper, or of the mifcondudt, of fome 
 future King. Temporary prepofTeflions of the 
 People may be made ufe of, to make them con- 
 cur in doing what will prove afterwards the 
 ruin of their own liberty. Plans of apparent
 
 OF ENGLAND. 497 
 
 improvement in the Conftitution, forwarded 
 by Men who, though with good intentions, 
 ihall proceed without a due knowledge of the 
 true principles and foundations of Govern- 
 ment, may produce effects quite contrary to 
 thofe which were defigned, and in reality pre- 
 pare its ruin (a). The Crown, on the other 
 hand, may, by the acquifition of foreign do- 
 minions, acquire a fatal independency on the 
 People : and if, without entering into any 
 farther particulars on this fubject, I were re- 
 
 () Inftead of looking for the principles of Politics 
 in their true fources, that is to lay, in the nature of 
 the affe&ions of Mankind, and of thofe fecret ties by 
 which they are united together in a ftate of Society, 
 Men have treated that fcience in the fame manner as 
 they did natuial Philofophy in the times of Ariftotle, 
 continually recurring to occult caufes, and principles, 
 from which no ufeful confequence could be drawn. 
 Thus, in order to ground particular affertions, they 
 have much ufed the word Conllitution, in a perfonal 
 fenfe, the Conftitution loves, the Conftitution forbids, 
 and the like. At other times they have had recourie 
 to Luxury, in order to explain certain events ; and at 
 others, to a ftill more occult caufe, which they have 
 called Corruption ; and abundance of companions 
 drawn from the human Body, have been alfo ufed for 
 the fame piupoies : continued inftances of fuch defective 
 arguments and confiderations occur in the Works of M. 
 de Montefquieu ; though a man of fo much genius, and 
 from whofe writings fo much information is neverthelefs 
 to be derived. Nor is it only the obfeurity of the 
 
 K k
 
 498 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 quired to point out the principal events which 
 would, if they were ever to happen, prove im- 
 mediately the ruin of the Englifh Government, 
 I would fay, The Englifh Goverment will be 
 no more, either when the Crown fhall become 
 independent on the Nation for its fupplies, or 
 when the Reprefentatives of the People fhall 
 begin to ihare in the Executive authority (#). 
 
 CHAP. XIX. 
 
 A few additional thoughts on the attempts that may 
 at particular times may be made to abridge the 
 pczver of the Crown, and fome of the dangers by 
 zvhlchfuch attempts may be attended. 
 
 THE power of the Crown is fupported by 
 deeper, and more numerous, roots, than 
 the generality of people are aware of, as has 
 
 writings of Politicians, and the impoffibility of applying 
 their fpeculative Dodtrines to practical ufes, which prove 
 that fome peculiar and uncommon difficulties lie in the way 
 of the znvefligation of political truths ; but the remark- 
 able perplexity which Men in general, even the ableft, 
 labour under when they attempt to defcant and argue 
 upon abftract queftions in politics, alfo juftifies this ob- 
 feryatioa, and proves that die true firfl principles of thi* 
 Science, whatever they are, lie deep both in the human 
 feelings, and undemanding. 
 
 [a) And if at any time, any dangerous changes w-re 
 to take place in the Englifh ConiUtution, the perni-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 499 
 
 been obferved in a former Chapter ; and there 
 is no caufe anxioufly to fear that the wrefting 
 any capital branch of its prerogative, may be 
 effected, in common peaceable times, by the 
 mere theoretical fpeculations of Politicians* 
 However, it is not equally impracticable that 
 fome event of the kind we mention may be 
 brought about through a conjunction of feveral 
 circumftances. Advantage may, in the firft 
 place, be taken of the minority, or even alfo 
 the inexperience or the errors, of the perfon 
 invefted' with the kingly authority. Of this 
 a remarkable inftance happened under the reign 
 of King George the Firft, while that Bill, by 
 which the number of Peers was in future to be 
 limited to a certain number was under confider- 
 arion in the Houfe of Commons, to whom it had 
 been fent from that of the Lords, where it had 
 been palled. So unacquainted was the King at 
 that time with his own intereft, and with the 
 conftitution of that Government over which he 
 was come to prefide, that having been per- 
 fuaded by that party who wifhed fuccefs to the 
 Bill, that the objection made againft it by the 
 Houfe of Commons, was only owing to an 
 opinion they entertained of the Bill beino- dif- 
 
 cious tendency of which the People were not able at firft 
 to difcover, reftridlions on the Liberty of the Prefs, and 
 a. the Power of Juries, will give them the firft information. 
 
 K k 2
 
 5oo THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 agreeable to him, that he was prevailed upon 
 to fend a mcffage to them, to let them know 
 that fuch an opinion was ill-grounded, and 
 that fhould the Bill pafs in their Houfe, it 
 would meet with his affent (a). Confidering 
 the prodigious importance of the confequences 
 of fuch a Bill, the fad: is certainly very re- 
 markable () 
 
 With thofe perfonal difad vantages under 
 which the Sovereign may lie for defending 
 his authority, other caufes of difficulty may 
 concur: fuch as popular difcontents of long 
 continuance in regard to certain particular 
 abufes oi* influence or authority. The gene- 
 rality of the Public bent, at that time, both 
 upon remedying the abufes that are complained 
 of, and preventing the like from taking place 
 in future, will perhaps wifh to fee that branch 
 of the prerogative which gave rife to them, 
 taken from the Crown : a general difpofition 
 to applaud fuch a mcafure, if efTe&ed, will 
 be manifefted from all quarters; and at the 
 fame time Men may not be aware that the only 
 material confequence that may arife from de- 
 priving the Crown of that branch of power 
 
 {a) See the Collection of Parliamentary Debates ; I do 
 ?>ot remember exactly what Volume. 
 
 U) This Bill has been mentioned in page 398.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 501 
 
 which has caufed the public complaints, will 
 perhaps be the having tranfpofed that branch 
 of power from its former feat to another, and 
 having truiled it to new hands, which will be 
 Hill more likely to abufe it than thole in which 
 at was formerly lodged. 
 
 In general, it may be laid down as a maxim, 
 that Power, under any form of Government, 
 mult exiit, and be trulted fomewhere. If the 
 Conftitution does not admit of a King, the go- 
 verning authority is lodged in the hands of Ma- 
 giflrates. If the government, at the fame time 
 it is a limited one, bears a Monarchical form, 
 thofe ihares of power that are retrenched 
 from the King's prerogative, moll likely con- 
 tinue to fubfiit, and are veiled in a Senate, or 
 AlTembly of great Men, under fome other name 
 of the like kind. 
 
 Thus, in the Kingdom of Sweden, which, 
 having been a limited Monarchy, may fupply 
 examples very applicable to the Government 
 of this Country, we find that the power of con- 
 voking the General States (or Parliament) of 
 that Kingdom, had been taken from the Crown; 
 but at the fame time we alio find that the Swe- 
 difh Senators had invelled themfelves with that 
 effential branch of power which the Crown 
 had loft. J mean here to fpeak of the Govern- 
 
 Kk 3
 
 $02 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ment of Sweden as it flood before tfle lafl rc 
 volution, 
 
 The power of the Swedifh King to confer of- 
 fices and employments, had been alfo very much 
 abridged. But what was wanting to the power 
 of the King, the Senate enjoyed : it had the 
 nomination of three perfons for every vacant 
 office, out of whom the king was too choofe one, 
 
 The king of Sweden had but a limited 
 power in regard to pardoning offenders ; but the 
 Senate like wife porTeifed what was wanting to 
 that branch of his prerogative ; and it appoint- 
 ed two perfons, without the confent of whom 
 the King could not remit the punifhment of 
 any offence. 
 
 The King of England has an exclufive power 
 in regard to foreign affairs, war, peace, trea- 
 ties ; in all that relates to military affairs ; he 
 has the difpofal of the exifling army, of the 
 fleet, &c, The King of Sweden had no fuch 
 extenfive powers; but they neverthelefs exifled : 
 every thing relating to the above mentioned 
 objects was tranfadted in the ArTembly of the 
 Senate; the majority decided; the King was 
 pbliged to fubmit to it ; and his onlv privilege 
 ponfifted in his vote being accounted two (<z.) 
 
 (a) The Swedifh Senate was ufually compofed of 
 fixtsgn Members. In regard to affairs of (icalier
 
 OF ENGLAND. 503 
 
 If we purfue farther our enquiry on the fub- 
 ject, we fhall find that the King of Sweden 
 could not raife whom he pleafed to the office of 
 Senator, as the King of England can, in regard 
 to the office of member of the Privy Council ; 
 but the Swedifh States, in the Affembly of 
 whom the Nobility enjoyed moft capital ad- 
 vantages, pofTefled a mare of the power we 
 mention, in conjunction with the King; and 
 in cafes of vacancies in the Senate, they elected 
 
 moment, they formed themfelves into two divifions, in 
 either of thefe when they did fit, the prefence of feven 
 Members was required for the effe&ual tranfafting of bu- 
 fineis : in affairs of importance, the affembly was formed 
 of the whole Senate ; and the prefence of ten Members was 
 required to give force to the refolutions. When the King 
 could not, or would not, take his feat, the Senate pro- 
 ceeded neverthelefs, and the majority continued to be 
 
 equally decifive. 
 
 As the Royal Seal was neceffary for putting in execution 
 the refolutions of the Senate, King Adolphus Frederic, 
 father to the prefent King, tried by refufing to lend the 
 fame, to procure that power which he had not by his 
 fufferagc, and to flop the proceedings of the Senate. 
 Great debates, in confequence of that pretenfion, arofe, 
 and continued for a while; but, at laft, in the year 1756, 
 the King was over-ruled by the Senate, who ordered a feal 
 to be made, that was named the King's Seal, which they 
 affixed to their official refolutions, when the King rcfufed 
 to lend his own.
 
 5o 4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 three perfons, out of whom the King was to 
 return one. 
 
 The King of England may, at all times, 
 deprive his Minifters of their employments. 
 The King of Sweden could remove no Man 
 from his office ; but the States enjoyed the 
 power that had been denied to the King ; and 
 they might deprive of their places both the Se- 
 nators, and thofe perfons in general who had a 
 /hare in the Adminiftration. 
 
 The King of England has the power of 
 diffolving, or keeping affembled as long as 
 he pleafes, his Parliament. The King of 
 Sweden had not that power ; but the States 
 might, of themfeves, prolong their duration 
 as they thought proper. 
 
 Thofe perfons who think that the preroga- 
 tive of a King cannot be too much abridged, 
 and that Power lofes all its influence on the 
 difpofitions and views of thofe who pofTefs~it, 
 according to the kind of name ufed to exprefs 
 thofe offices by which it is conferred, may be 
 fatisfied, no doubt, to behold thofe branches 
 of power that were taken from a King, diflri- 
 buted to feveral Bodies, and lhared in by the 
 Reprefentatives of the People : but thofe who 
 think that Pc>wer, when parcelled and diffufed, 
 |s never fo well reprelTed and regulated as
 
 OF ENGLAND. 505 
 
 when it is confined to a fole indivifible feat, 
 that keeps the Nation united and awake, 
 thofe who know that, names by no means alter- 
 ing the intrinfic nature of things, the Reprefen- 
 tatives of the People, as foon as they are veiled 
 with independent authority, become ipfo fafto 
 its Mailers, thofe perfons, I fay, will not think 
 it a very happy regulation in the former Confli- 
 tution of Sweden, to have deprived the King 
 of prerogatives formerly attached to his office, 
 in order to veft the fame either in a Senate, 
 or in the Deputies of the People, and thus to 
 have trufled with a fhare in the exercife of the 
 public power, thofe very Men whofe Confli- 
 tutional office mould have been to watch and 
 reflrain it. 
 
 To the indivifibility of the governing autho- 
 rity in England, the community of interefl 
 which takes place among all orders of Men, is 
 owing ; and from this community of interefl 
 riles, as a neceffary confequence, the liberty en- 
 joyed by all ranks of fubjedts. This obfervatlon 
 has been infilled upon at length in the courfe 
 of this Work. The Ihorteft reflection on the 
 frame of the human heart, fuffices to convince 
 vis of its truth, and at the fame time mani- 
 fefls the danger that would refult from making 
 any changes in the form of the exifling Go-
 
 506 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 vernment by which this general community 
 of intereft might be leilened, unlefs we are 
 at the fame time alfo determined to believe, that 
 partial Nature forms Men in this Ifland, of 
 quite other fluff than the felfifh and ambitious 
 one of which flie ever made them in other 
 Countries (a). 
 
 {a) Such regulations as may capitally affeft, through 
 their confequences, the equipoife of a Government, may 
 be brought about, even though the promoters themfelves 
 of thofe regulations are not aware of their tendency. 
 At the fame time the Bill was palled in the lali century, by 
 which it was enabled that the Crown fhould give up its 
 prerogative of diffolving the Parliament then fitting, the 
 generality of People had no thought of the calamitous 
 ponfequences that were to follow : very far from it. 
 The King himfelf certainly felt no very great apprehen- 
 fion on that account ; elfe he would not have given his 
 afient : and the Commons themfelves, it appears, had but 
 very faint notions of the capital changes which the Bill 
 would fpeedily effect in their political fituation. 
 
 When the Crown of Sweden was, in the firft inftance, 
 ftripped of all the different prerogatives we have men- 
 tioned, it does not appear that thofe meafures were ef- 
 fected by fuuden, open provifions for that purpofe : 
 it is very probable they had been prepared by indirect 
 regulations formerly made, the whole tendency of which 
 fcarcely any body perhaps could forefeee at the time they 
 \vere framed. 
 
 When the Bill was in agitation, that has been men- 
 tioned in page 398, and 499, by which the Houfe of Peers 
 was in future to be limited to a certain number that was 
 pot to be exceeded, the great conftitutional confequences
 
 OF ENGLAND. 507 
 
 But paft experience does not by any means 
 allow ns to entertain fo pleafing an opinion. 
 
 of the Bill werefcarcely attended to by any body. The 
 King himfelf certainly faw no harm in it, fince he fenf 
 an open meffage to promote the paffing of it : a mea- 
 fure which 4 cannot fay how far it was in itfejf regular. 
 The Bill was, it appears, generally approved out of doors. 
 Its fate was for a long time doubtful in the Houfe 
 of Commons; nor did they acquire any glory with the bulk 
 of the People by finally rejecting it : and Judge Blackftone, 
 as I find in his Commentaries, does not ieem to have 
 thought much of the Bill and its being rejected, as he 
 only obferves that the Commons " wiflied to keep the 
 door of the Houfe of Lords as open as poffible. 1 ' Yet, 
 no Bill of greater conftitutional importance was ever agi- 
 tated in Parliament; fince the confequences of its be- 
 ing paiTed, would have been the freeing the Houfe of 
 Lords, both in their Judicial and Legiflative capacities, 
 from all conftitutional check whatever, either from the 
 Crown, or the Nation, Nay, it is not to be doubted 
 they would have acquired, in time, the right of electing 
 their own Members: though it would be ufelefs to point 
 out here by what feries of intermediate events the mealure 
 might have been brought about. Whether there exifted 
 any actual project of this kind, among the firft framers of 
 the Bill, does not appear: but a certain number of 
 the Members of the Houfe we mention, would have thought 
 pf it foon enough, if the Bill in queltion had been enacted 
 into a law ; and they would certainly have met with fuccefs, 
 had they been but contented to wait, and had thev taken 
 time. Other equally important changes in the fubftance, 
 and perhaps the outward form, of the Government, would 
 haye followed. 
 
 8
 
 5o8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 The perufal of the Hiftory of this Country will 
 ihew us, that the care of its Legiflators for the 
 welfare of the fubjed:, always kept pace with the 
 exigencies of their own lituation. When, thro* 
 the minority, or eafy temper of the reigning 
 Prince, or other circumftances, the* dread 
 of a fuperior Power began to be overlooked, 
 the public caufe was immediately deferted in a 
 greater or lefs degree, and purfuit after private 
 iufluence and lucrative offices took the place of 
 patriotifm. When, under the reign of Charles 
 the Firft, the authority of the Crown was for a 
 while utterly annihilated, thofe very Men who, 
 till then, had talked of nothing but Magna 
 Charta and Liberty, inftantly endeavoured openly 
 to trample both under foot. 
 
 Since the time we mention, the former Con- 
 ftitution of the Government having been re- 
 ftored, the great outlines of public liberty have 
 indeed been warmly and fcrioufly defended : 
 but if any partial unjufl laws or regulations 
 have been made, efpecially fince the Revo- 
 lution of the year 1689, if any abufes in- 
 jurious to particular claffes of individuals have 
 been fufTered to continue (facts into the truth 
 of which I do not propofe to examine here), it 
 will certainly be found upon enquiry, that thofe 
 laws and thofe abufes were fuch as that from
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 509 
 
 them the Members of the Legiflature well 
 knew, that neither they, nor their friends, 
 would ever be likely to fufTer. 
 
 If through the unforefeen operation of fomc 
 new regulation made to reftrain the royal pre- 
 rogative, or through fome fudden public revo- 
 lution, any particular bodies or clafTes of indi- 
 viduals were ever to acquire a perfonal indepen- 
 dent mare in the exercife of the governing 
 authority, we mould behold the public virtue 
 and patriotifm of the Legislators and Great Men 
 immediately ceafe with its caufe, and Arifto- 
 cracy, as it were watchful of the opportunity, 
 burft out at once, and fpread itfelf over the 
 Kingdom. 
 
 The Men who are now the Minifters, 
 then the Partners of the Crown, would in- 
 Jftantly fet themfefves above the reach of 
 the law, and foon after enfue the fame privi- 
 lege to their feveral fupporters or depen- 
 dants. 
 
 Perfonal and independent power being be- 
 come the only kind of fecurity of which Men 
 would now fhew themfelves ambitious, the 
 Habeas Corpus Aft, and in general all thofe laws 
 which Subjects of every rank mention with love, 
 and to which they look up for protection and 
 fafety, would be fpoken of with contempt, and 
 
 6
 
 5 io THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 mentioned as remedies fit only Countrymen 
 and Cits : it even would not be long before 
 thev were fet afide, as obftructing the wife and 
 falutary fteps of the Senate. 
 
 The pretenfions of an equality of right in 
 all Subjects, of whatever rank and order, to 
 their property and to perfonal fafety, would 
 foon be looked upon as an old fafhioned doc- 
 trine, which the Judge himfelf would ridicule 
 from the Bench. And the liberty of the prefs, 
 now lb univerfally and warmly vindicated, 
 would, without lofs of time, be cried down 
 and fupprelTed, as only ferving to keep up the 
 infolence and pride of a refractory people. 
 
 And let us not believe that the miftaken 
 People, whofe Reprefentatives we now behold 
 making fuch a firm {land a gain ft the indhifiblt 
 power of the Crown, would, amidft the gene- 
 ral devaluation of every thing they hold dear, 
 eaaly find Men equally difpofed to reprefs the 
 encroaching, while attainable, power of a Se- 
 nate and Body of Nobles. 
 
 The time would be no more when the People, 
 upon whatever Men they let their choice fall, 
 are lure to ii:.o. them ready fincerely to join in 
 the fupport of every important branch of pub- 
 lie liberty. 
 
 Prefem or expected, perfonal power and in-
 
 OF ENGLAND, 511 
 
 dependence on the laws, being now the con- 
 fequence of the truft of the People, wherever 
 they ihould apply for fervants, they would 
 only meet with betrayers. Corrupting as it 
 were every thing they Ihould touch, they 
 could confer no favour upon an individual 
 but to deftroy his public virtue ; and to repeat 
 the words ufed in a former Chapter, " their 
 " railing a Man would only be immediately 
 " infpiring him with views directly oppofite 
 " to their own, and fending him to increale the 
 " number of their enemies." 
 
 All thefe considerations ftrongly point out 
 the very great caution which is neceffary to be 
 ufed in the difficult buflnefs of laying new re- 
 ftraints on the governing authority. Let there- 
 fore the lefs informed part of the People, 
 whofe zeal requires to be kept up by viflble 
 objects, look if they choofe upon the Crown 
 as the only feat of the evils they are expofed to ; 
 miftaken notions on their part are lefs dan- 
 gerous than political indifference, and they 
 are more eafily directed than roufed, but at 
 the fame time, let the more enlightened part 
 of the Nation conftantly remember, that the 
 Conftitution only fubfifts by virtue of a proper 
 equilibrium, by a line being drawn between 
 Power and Liberty. 
 
 Made wife by the examples of feveral other
 
 5 i2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 Nations, by thofe which the Hiftory of this 
 very Country affords, let the People in the 
 heat of their ftruggles in the defence of liberty, 
 always take heed, only to reach, never to over- 
 ihoot, the mark, only to reprefs, never to 
 transfer and diffufe Power. 
 
 Amidft the alarms that may, at particular 
 times, arife from the really awful authority 
 of the Crown, let it, on the one hand, be re- 
 membered, that even the power of the Tu- 
 dors was oppofed and fubdued, and on the 
 other let it be looked upon as a fundamental 
 maxim, that, whenever the profped: of per- 
 fonal power and independence on the go- 
 verning authority, fhall offer to the view of 
 the Members of the Legiilature, or in gene- 
 ral of thofe Men to whom the People muft 
 trull, even Hope itfelf is deftroyed. The 
 Hollander, in the midft of a ftorm, though 
 trufting to the experienced flrength of the 
 mounds that protect him, lhudders no doubt 
 at the fight of the foaming Element that fur- 
 rounds him ; but they all gave themfelves over 
 for loft, when they thought the worm had got 
 into their dykes (a). 
 
 [a) Such new forms as may prove deftrucYive of the 
 real fubftance of a Government, may be unwarily a- 
 dopted, in the fame manner as the fuperftitious notions
 
 OF ENGLAND. 513 
 
 CHAP. XX. 
 
 A few additional Obfervations on the right of Taxation 
 which is lodged in the hands of the Reprefentaiives 
 of the People. What kind of danger this Right 
 may be expofed to. 
 
 THE generality of Men, or at lead of Po- 
 liticians, feem to confider the right of 
 taxing themfelves, enjoyed by the Englifh Na- 
 tion, as being no more than a means of fecur- 
 ing their property againft the attempts of the 
 Crown ; while they overlook the nobler and 
 more extenfive efficiency of that privilege. 
 
 The right to grant fubfidies to the Crown, 
 poffeffed by the People of England, is the 
 fafe-guard of all their other liberties, religious 
 and civil : it is a regular means conferred on 
 them by the Conftitution, of influencing the 
 motion of the Executive power ; and it forms 
 the tie by which the latter is bound to them, 
 In fhort, this privilege is a fure pledge in 
 their hands, that their Sovereign, who can 
 difmifs their Reprefentatives at his pleafure? 
 
 and pra&ices defcribed in my Work, intitled Memorial.- 
 of Human Superjlitiop, may be introduced into a Religion,, 
 fa as to entirely fubvert the true fpirit of it, 
 
 L X
 
 jr4 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 will never entertain thoughts of ruling with- 
 out the afiiftance of thefe. 
 
 If, through unforefeen events, the Crown 
 could attain to be independent on the People 
 in regard to its fupplies, fuch is the extent of 
 its Prerogative, that fro;:: that moment, all 
 the means the People poiTefs to vindicate their 
 liberty, would be annihilated. They v lid 
 have no refource left, except indeed that un- 
 certain and calamitous one, of an appeal to 
 the fvvord ; which is no more, after all, than 
 what the mofl enilaved Nations enjoy. 
 
 Let us fuppofe, for inftance, that abufes of 
 power mould be committed, which, either by 
 their immediate operation, or by the precedents 
 they might eftablim, mould undermine the li- 
 berty of the fubjeft. The People, it will be 
 faid, would then have their remedy in the Le- 
 gislative power pofieffed by their Reprefcnta- 
 tives. The latter would, at the flrft opportu- 
 nity, interfere, and frame fuch Bills as would 
 prevent the like abufes for the future. But here 
 we muft obierve, that the AfTent of the Sove- 
 reign is neceiTary to make thole Bills become 
 L a w s ; and if, as w e h a ve j u ft n o w fa ppo fe d , 
 he had no need of che fupport of the Com- 
 mons, how could they obtain his ailent to laws 
 thus purpofdy framed to abridge his authority ?
 
 OF ENGLAND. 515 
 
 Again, let us fuppofe that, inftead of con- 
 tenting itfelf with making flow advances to 
 defpotifm, the Executive power, or its Mini- 
 (rers, mould at once openly invade the liberty 
 of the fubjedt. Obnoxious, men, Printers for 
 inflance, or political Writers, are deftroyed, 
 either by military violence, or, to do things 
 with more fecurity, with the forms of law. 
 Then, it will be faid, the Reprefentatives of the 
 People would impeacli the perfons concerned 
 in thofe meafures. Though unable to reach a 
 King who perfonally can do no wrong, they at 
 kail would lay hold of thofe Men who were the 
 immediate inftruments of his tyrannical pro- 
 ceedings, and endeavour, by bringing them to 
 condign punimment, to deter future Judges or 
 Minifters from imitating them. All this I 
 grant ; and I will even add, that circum- 
 stanced as the Reprefentatives of the People 
 now are, and having to do with a Sovereign 
 who can enjoy no dignity without their af- 
 fiftance, it is moll likely that their endea- 
 vours in the purfuits of fuch laudable objedts 
 would prove fuccefsful. But if, on the contrary, 
 the King, as we have fuppofed, flood in ro 
 heed of their affiflance, and moreover knew 
 th?.t he fhould never want it, ic is impoffible 
 to think that he would -then fuffer himfelf to 
 
 T, 1 2
 
 5*6 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 remain a tame fpectator of their proceedings. 
 The impeachments thus brought by them 
 would immediately prove the fignal of their 
 difmiflion ; and the King would make hafte, by 
 difTolving them, both to revenge what would 
 then be called the infolence of the Commons, 
 and to fecure his Minifters. 
 
 But even thofe are vain fuppofkions : the 
 evil would reach much farther ; and we may 
 be affured that if ever the Crown was to be in 
 a condition to govern without the afiiftance of 
 the Reprefentatives of the people, it would 
 difmifs them for ever, and thus rid itfelf of an 
 Affembly which, while it continued to be a 
 clog on its power, could no longer be of 
 any fervice to it. This Charles the Firft at- 
 tempted to do when he found his Parliaments 
 grew refractory, and the Kings of France really 
 have done, with refpedt to the General Eftates 
 of their Kingdom. 
 
 And indeed if we confider the extent of the 
 Prerogative of the King of England, and 
 efpecially the circumftance of his completely 
 uniting in himfelf all the executive and active 
 powers in the State, we (hall find that it is no 
 exaggeration to fay, that he has power fuf- 
 ficient to be as arbitrary as the Kings of France, 
 were it not for the right of taxation, which,
 
 OF ENGLAND. 517 
 
 in "England is poffeffed by the People ; and 
 the only constitutional difference between the 
 French and Englifh Nations is, that the former 
 can neither confer benefits on their Sovereign, 
 nor hinder his meafures ; while the latter, how 
 extenfive foever the Prerogative of their King 
 may be, can deny him the means of exert- 
 ing it. 
 
 But here a moft important obfervation is to 
 be made; and I entreat the reader's attention to 
 the fubjecl. This right of granting fubfidies 
 to the Crown, can only be effectual when it 
 is exercifed by one Affembly alone. When fe- 
 veral diflinct Affemblies have it equally in 
 their power to fupply the wants of the Prince, 
 the cafe becomes totally altered. The com- 
 petition which fo eafily takes place between 
 thofe different Bodies, and even the bare confei- 
 oufnefs which each entertains of its inability to 
 hinder the meafures of the Sovereign, render it 
 impoffible for them to make any effectual con- 
 ftitutional ufe of their privilege. tc Thofe dif- 
 * ferent Parliaments or Eftates (to repeat the 
 " obfervation introduced in the former part 
 u of this Work) having no means of recom- 
 *' mending themfelves to their Sovereign, but 
 *' their fuperior readinefs in complying with 
 S c his demands, vie with each other in grant- 
 
 LI 3
 
 5x8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 " ing what it would not only be fruitlefs, but 
 " even dangerous to refufe. And the King, 
 " in the mean time, foon comes to demand 
 ec as a tribute, a gift which he is confident to 
 (t obtain." In fhort, it may be laid down as a 
 maxim, that when a Sovereign is made to de- 
 pend, in regard to his fnpplies, on more Ai- 
 femblies than one, he, in fat, depends upon 
 none. And indeed the King of France is not 
 independent on his People for his neceiTary 
 iupplies, any othervvife than by drawing the 
 fame from feveral different AiTcmblies of their 
 Reprefentatives : the latter have in appearance 
 a right to refufe all his demands : and as the 
 Englim call the grants they make to their 
 Kings, Aids or Subfidies, fo do the Eitates of 
 the French provinces call their's Dons gratttits, 
 or free gifts. 
 
 What is it, therefore, that conftitutes the 
 difference between the political (ituation of the 
 French and Englim Nations, fince their rights 
 thus feem outwardly to be the fame? The diffe- 
 rence lies in this, that there has never been in 
 England more than one Afiembly that could fup- 
 ply the w?nts of the Sovereign. This has always 
 kept him in a Mate, not of a feeming, but of a 
 rf~l dependence on the Reprefentatives of the 
 people for hi>> r.eceffary fupplics ; and how low
 
 OF ENGLAND. 519 
 
 foever the liberty of the Subject may, at par- 
 ticular times, have funk, they have always 
 found themfelves pofferTed of a moft effectual 
 means of reftoring it, whenever they have 
 thought proper fo to do. Under Henry the 
 Eighth, for inftance, we find the Defpotifm of 
 the Crown to have been carried. to an aftonifh- 
 ing height : it was even enacted that the Pro- 
 clamations of the King ihould have the force 
 of law; a thing which even in France, never 
 was fo exprefly declared : yet, no fooner did 
 the Nation recover from its long (late of fu- 
 pinenefs, than the exorbitant power of the 
 Crown was reduced within its conflitutional 
 bounds. 
 
 To no other caufe than the difadvantage of 
 their fituation, are we to afcribe the low condi- 
 tion in which the Deputies of the People in the 
 Affembly called the General Eftates of France, 
 were always forced to remain. 
 
 Surrounded as they were by the particular 
 Eftates of thole Provinces into which the 
 Kingdom had been formerly divided, they 
 never were able to ftipulate conditions with 
 their Sovereign ; and inftead of making their 
 right of granting fubfidies to the Crown ferve 
 to gain them in the end a Ihare in Legislation, 
 they ever remained confined to the naked pri- 
 
 LI4
 
 520 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 vilegc of " humble Supplication and Remonr 
 << tfrance." 
 
 Thofe Eftates, however, as all the great 
 Lords in France were admitted into them, be- 
 gan at length to appear dangerous ; and as 
 the King could in the mean time do without 
 their affiftance, they were fet ande. But feve- 
 ral of the particular Eftates of the Provinces 
 are preferved to this day : fpme, which for 
 temporary reafons had been abolifhed, have 
 been reftcred : nay, fo manageable have po- 
 pular Affemblies been found by the Crown, 
 when it has to do with many, that the kind 
 of Government we mention is that which it 
 has been found moft convenient to aflign to 
 Corfica; and Corfica has been made un pays 
 d' Etats (a). 
 
 (a) An idea of the manner in which the b,ufinefs 
 cf granting fupplies to the Crown, was conducted by: 
 the States of the province of Britanny, under the reign, 
 of Lewis the Fourteenth, may be formed from feveral 
 lively itrokes to be met with in the Letters of Mad. de 
 Sevigne, whofe Eftate lay in that Province, and who 
 had often affiled at the holding of thofe States. The 
 granting of fupplies' was not, it feems, looked upon 
 as any ferious kind of bufinefs. 1 he whole time the 
 States were fitting, was a continued fcene of feftivity 
 and entertainment j the canvaffing of the demands of 
 the Crown was chiefly carried on at the table of the 
 Nobleman who had been deputed from Court to hold
 
 OF ENGLAND, $i\ 
 
 That the Crown in England mould, on a 
 Hidden, render itfelf independent on the Com- 
 mons for its fupplies, that is, mould on a fud- 
 den fucccfsfully affume to itfelf a right to lay- 
 taxes on the fubject, by its own authority, is 
 not certainly an event in any degree likely to 
 take place, nor indeed that mould, at this pre- 
 fent time, raife any kind of political fear. But 
 it is not equally impracticable that the right 
 of the Reprefentatives of the People might be- 
 
 the States ; and every thing was commonly decided 
 by a kind of acclamation. In a certain AfTembly of 
 thofe States, the Duke of Chaulnas, the Lord Deputy, 
 had a prefent of fifty thoufand crowns made to him, as 
 well as a considerable one for his Duchefs, befides ob- 
 taining the demand of the Court: and the Lady we quote 
 here, commenting fomewhat jocularly on thefe grants, 
 fays, Ce riejl pas que nous foyons riches; mats nous fommes 
 bonnetes, nous anions du courage, & entre midi & une heure, 
 nous ne fa-vons rien refufer a nos amis. " It is not that we 
 *f are rich ; but we are civil, we are full of courage, and, 
 " between twelve and one o'clock, we are unable to deny 
 *' any thing to our friends." 
 
 The different Provinces of France, it may be obferved, 
 are liable to pay feveral taxes befides thofe impofed on 
 them by their own States. Dean Tucker, in one of his 
 Traces, in which he has thought proper to quote this Work, 
 has added to the above inftance of the French Provinces, 
 that of the States of the Auftrian Netherlands, which is 
 very concufive. And examples to the fame purpofe might 
 be fupplied by all thofe Kingdoms of Europe in which 
 Provincial States are held.
 
 522 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 come invalidated, by being divided in the man- 
 ner that has been juft defcribed. 
 
 Such a divifion of the right of the People 
 might be effected feveral different ways. Na- 
 tional calamities for inflance, unfortunate fo- 
 reign wars attended with lofs of public credit, 
 might fuggeft methods for railing the neceffary 
 fupplies, different from thofe which have hi- 
 therto been ufed. Dividing the Kingdom into 
 a certain number of parts, which fhould fe- 
 verally vote fubfidies to the Crown, or evert 
 diflincl: afTeffments to be made by the different 
 Counties into which England is now divided, 
 might, in the circumftances we fuppofe, be 
 looked upon as advifeable expedients ; and 
 thefe being once introduced, might be con- 
 tinued afterwards. 
 
 Another divifion of the right of the People, 
 much more likely to take place than thofe juft: 
 mentioned, might be fuch as might arife from 
 acquisitions of foreign dominions, the inhabi- 
 tants of which fhould in time claim and obtain 
 a right to treat directly with the Crown, and 
 grant fupplies to it, without the interference of 
 the Britifh. Legiflature. 
 
 Should any Colonies acquire the right we 
 mention ihould, for inflance, the American 
 Colonies have acquired it, as they claimed it,
 
 OF ENGLAND, 523 
 
 k is not to be doubted that the confequences 
 that have refulted from a divifion like that we 
 mention in molt of the Kingdoms of Europe, 
 would alio have taken place in the Britilh do- 
 minions, and that that fpirit of competition 
 which has been above defcribed, would in time 
 have manifefted itfelf between the different 
 Colonies. This deiire of ingratiating themfelves 
 with the Crown, by means of the privilege 
 of granting fupplies to it, has even been openly 
 conierTed by an Agent of the American Pro- 
 vinces (a), when, on his being examined by 
 the Houle of Commons, in the year 1766, 
 he faid, " the granting Aids to the Crown, is the 
 i( only means the Americans have of recommending 
 (i themfelves to their Sovereign." And the events 
 that have of late years taken place in America, 
 render it evident that the Colonies would not 
 have fcrupled going any lengths to obtain fa- 
 vourable conditions at the expence of Britaia 
 and the Britilh Leo-iflature, 
 
 That a limilar fpirit of competition might 
 be raifed in Ireland, is alio fufficiently plain 
 from certain late events. And Ihould the 
 American Colonies have obtained their de- 
 mands, and at the fame time fheuH IrehncJ 
 And America have increafed in wealth to a ccr- 
 
 [a) Doftor Franklin.
 
 524 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 tain degree, the time might have come at 
 which the Crown might have governed Eng- 
 ! with the fupplies of Ireland and America 
 Ireland with the fupplies of England and of 
 the Amer :an Colonies and the American Co- 
 lonies with the money of each other, and of 
 England and Ireland. 
 
 To this it may be objected, rhat the fupplies 
 granted by the Colonies, even though joined 
 with thofe of Ireland, never could have rifen 
 to fuch a height as to hi e counterbalanced 
 
 the importance of the Englifh commons. 
 
 I anfwer, in the firft place, that there would 
 have been no neceffity that the aids granted 
 by Ireland and America mould have rifen to 
 an equality with thofe granted by the Britim 
 parliament : it would have been fufficient, to 
 produce the effecTs we mention, that they had 
 only borne a certain proportion with thefe lat- 
 ter, fo far as to have conferred on the Crown 
 a certain degree of independence, and at the 
 fame time have railed in the Englifh Commons 
 a correfpondent fenfe of felf-diffidence in the 
 exercife of their undoubted privilege of grant- 
 ing, or rather rsfufing, fubfidies to the Crown, 
 Here it mull be remembered, that the right 
 of granting, or refufmg, fupplies to the Crown, 
 is the only ultimate, forcible, privilege the
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 525 
 
 Britiih Parliament poffefs : by the Conftitution 
 they have no other, as hath been obferved in 
 the beginning of this Chapter : this circum- 
 ftance ought to be combined with the abfolute 
 exclufivenefs of the executive powers lodged in 
 the Crown with its prerogative of difTenting 
 from the Bills framed by Parliament, and even 
 of diffolving it (a). 
 
 (a) Being with Doclor Franklin at his houfe in Craven- 
 ftreet, fome months before he went back to America, 
 I mentioned to him a few of the remarks contained ia 
 this Chapter, and in general, that the claim of the 
 American Colonies dire&ly clafhed with one of the 
 vital principles of the Englifh Conftitution. The observa- 
 tion, I remember, ftruck him very much : it led him af- 
 terwards to fpeak to me of the examination he had under- 
 gone in the Houfe of Commons ; and he concluded with 
 lending me the volume of the Collection of Parliamentary 
 Debates, in which an account of it is contained. Finding 
 'he conftitutional tendency of the claim of the Americans 
 to be a fubjett not very generally underftood, I added a 
 few paragraphs concerning it, in the Englifh Edition I 
 ibme time after gave of this work ; and on publishing 
 a third Edition of the fame, I thought it might not 
 be amifs to write fomething more compact on th 
 fubjeft, and have accordingly added the prefent new 
 Chapter, into which I have transferred the few additional 
 paragraphs I mention, leaving in the place where they 
 ftood (pag. 45.) only the general obfervations on the right 
 of granting fubfidies, which were formerly in the French 
 work Several of the ideas, and even expreflions con-
 
 526 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 I mall mention in the fecond place, a re- 
 markable fact in regard to the fubjedt we are 
 treating (which may ferve to ihevv that Poli- 
 ticians are not always confiftent, or even fa- 
 gacious in their arguments), which is, that 
 the fame pcrfons who were the moft ftrenuous 
 advocates for granting to the American Co- 
 lonies their demands, were at the fame time 
 the moft fanguine in their predictions of the 
 future wealth and greatnefs of America, and 
 at the fame time alfo, ufed to make frequent 
 complaints on the undue influence which the 
 Crown derives- from the fcanty fupplies granted 
 to it by the kingdom of Ireland (a). 
 
 Had the American Colonies fully obtained 
 their demands, both the eflence of the prefent 
 Englim Government, and the condition of 
 the Englifh People, would certainly have been 
 altered thereby : nor would fuch a change 
 
 tained in this Chapter, made their appearance in the 
 Public Advertifer t about the time I was preparing the firft 
 Edition : I fent them myfelf to that Newfpaper, under 
 the fignature of Ad-vena. I mention this for the fake of 
 thofe perfons who may perchance remember having feea 
 the {ketch I allude to. 
 
 [a\ For inftance, the complaints made in regard to the 
 penfions on the Iriih eitabliihment.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 527 
 
 have been inconfiderable, but in proportion as 
 the Colonies fhould have remained in a ftate of 
 national poverty (a~). 
 
 fa) When I obferve that no Man who wimed for the 
 prefervation of the form and fpirit of the Englilh Consti- 
 tution, ought to have defired that the claim of the Ame- 
 rican Colonies might be granted them, neither do I meaa 
 to fay that the American Colonies mould have given up 
 their claim. The wifdom of Minifters, in regard t 
 American affairs, ought to have been constantly employed 
 in making the Colonies ufefu> to this Country, and at the 
 fame time in hiding their fubjection from them (2 
 caution which is, after all, snore or lefs ufed in every 
 Government udoh earth) ; it ought to have been exerted 
 in preventing the oppofite interefts of Britain, and of Ame- 
 rica, from being brought to an iffue, to an/ fuch claming 
 dilemma as would render difobedience on the one hand, 
 and the refort to {orce.. on the other, ahaoft furely un- 
 avoidable. The 'generality of people fancy that Ministers 
 ufe a great dep'.h of thought, and much ft recall in their 
 operations ; wheieas the truth is, that Minifters in all 
 Countries, ttever think but of providing foi: prefent, im- 
 mediate, contingencies ; in doing which they conftandy 
 follow die open track before them. This method does 
 very well for the common eouife of human affairs, and 
 even, is the fafeft ; but whenever cafes and cir tumftances of 
 a nr;w and unknown nature occur, fad blunders and uproat 
 arf; the confequences. The celebrated Coatit Oxenfliern, 
 Chancellor of Sweden, one day when his Son: was expreff- 
 ing to him his diffidence of his own abilities, and the 
 dread with which he thought of ever engaging in the ma- 
 nagement of public affairs, made the following Latin an- 
 fwer to him ; Nefcis mi jili, quam parvd cum fapientia re* 
 gitur mundm (You do not know, my fon, with what lit- 
 tle Wifdom the World is governed.)
 
 S*8 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 CHAP. XXI. 
 
 Conclufion. A few words on the nature of the JDi- 
 viftons that take place in England. 
 
 1 Shall conclude this Work with a few ob- 
 fervations on the total freedom from vio- 
 lence with which the political difputes and 
 contentions in England are conducted and 
 terminated, in order both to give a farther 
 
 Matters havicng come to an eruption, it was no longer 
 to be expe&ed they could be compromifed by the pallia- 
 tive offers fent at different times from this Country to 
 America. When the Earl of Carlifle folicited to be at 
 the head of the folernn Commiffion that failed for the 
 purpofe we miention, he did not certainly fhew modefty 
 equal to that of the Son of Chancellor Oxenftiern. It 
 has been faid that, in that ftage of the conteft, the Ame- 
 ricans could not think that the propofals thus fent to them 
 were lerioufly meant : however, this cannot have been 
 the principal caufe of the mifcarriage of the commiffion. 
 The fat is, that after the Americans had been once made 
 to open theii.' eyes on their political fituation, and rendered 
 fenfible of die local advantages of their Country, it was 
 become in a manner impoffible to have flruck with them 
 any bargain at which either Nation would have afterwards 
 caufe to rejoice, or even to have made any bargain at 
 all. It would be needlefs to fay here any thing more on 
 the fubjeft of the American conteft. 
 
 The motto of one of the Englifh Nobility, mould have 
 been that of Minifters, in their regulations for rendering 
 the Cclor.ies ufeful to the Mother Country, Faire fans 
 dire. 6
 
 OF ENGLANI). $29 
 
 proof of the foundnefs of the principles on 
 which the Englifii Government is founded, 
 and to confute in general the opinion of 
 foreign Writers or Politicians, who, milled by 
 the apparent heat with which thofe difputes 
 are fometirhes carried on, and the clamour to 
 which they give occaiion, look upon England 
 as a perpetual fcene of civil broils and dif- 
 fenlions. 
 
 In fact if we confider, in the fir ft place, 
 the conftant tenor of the conduct of the 
 Parliament, we mall fee that whatever differ- 
 ent views the feveral Branches that compofe it 
 may at times purfue, and whatever ufe they 
 may accordingly make of their privileges, they 
 never go, in regard to each other, beyond 
 the terms, not only of decency, but even of 
 that general good underftanding which ought 
 to prevail among them. 
 
 Thus the King, though he preferves the 
 ftyle of his Dignity, never addreffes the two 
 Houfes but in terms of regard and affection ; 
 and if at any time he chufes to refufe their 
 Bills, he only fays that he will confider of 
 them (le Roy s'adz'ifera) ; which is certainly a 
 gentler expreffion than the word Veto* 
 
 The two Houfes on their part, though very 
 jealous, each within their own walls, cf the 
 
 M m
 
 53 
 
 o 
 
 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 freedom of fpeech, are, on the other hand, 
 careful that that liberty ihall never break out 
 into unguarded expreffions with regard to the 
 perfon of the King. It is even a conftant rule 
 amono-ft them never to mention him, when 
 thev mean to blame the adminiilration ; and 
 thofe things which they may choofe to cenfure, 
 even in the Speeches made by the King in 
 perfon, and which are plainly his own acts, 
 are never confidered but as the deed of his 
 Minifters, or in general of thofe who have ad- 
 
 vifed him. 
 
 The two Houfes are alfo equally attentive 
 to prevent every ftep that may be inconiiftcnt 
 with that refpeft which they mutually owe to 
 one another. The examples of their differ- 
 ences with each other are very rare, and were 
 for the molt part mere mifundcrftandings. 
 Nay, in order to prevent all fubjer. of alterca- 
 tion, the cuftom is, that when one of the 
 two Houfes refufes to confent to a Bill pre- 
 fented by the other, no formal declaration is 
 made of fuch refufal ; and that Houfe whole 
 Bill is rejected, learns its fite only from their 
 hearing no more of it, or by what the Mem- 
 bers may be told as private perfons. 
 
 In each Houfe, the Members take care, 
 even in the heat of debate, never to go be- 
 8
 
 OF ENGLAND. 531 
 
 yond certain bounds in their manner of fpeak- 
 in of each other : if thev were to ofFend in 
 that refpecl:, they would certainly incur the 
 cenfure of the Houfe. And as reafon has 
 taught Mankind to refrain, in their wars, 
 from all injuries. to each other that have no 
 tendency to promote the main object of their 
 contentions, fo a kind of Law of Nations 
 (if I may fo exprefs myfelf) has been intro- 
 duced among the perfons who form the Par- 
 liament and take a part in the debates : they 
 have difcovered that they may very well be of 
 oppofite parties, and yet not hate and perfe- 
 cute one another. Coming frefh from debates 
 carried on even with confiderable warmth, thev 
 meet without reluctance in the ordinary inter- 
 couife of life ; and, fufpending all hoftilities, 
 they hold every place out of Parliament to be 
 neutral ground. 
 
 In regard to the generality of the Peo- 
 ple, as they never are called upon to come 
 to a final deciiion with refpedt to any public 
 meafures, or exprefsly to concur in fupport- 
 ing them, they preferve themfelves flill more 
 free from party fpirit than their Reprefenta- 
 tives themfelves fometimes are. Confidering, 
 as we have obferved, the affairs of Govern- 
 ment as only matter of fpeculation, they ne- 
 
 M m 2
 
 53 2 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 ver have occafion to engage in any vehement 
 contefls among themfelves on that account. 
 Much lefs do they think of taking an active 
 and violent part in the difference!; of particular 
 factions, or the quarrels of private individuals. 
 And thofe family feuds, thofe party animofities, 
 thofe victories and confequent outrages of 
 factions alternately fuccefsful ; in fhort, all 
 thofe inconveniences which in fo many other 
 States have conftantly been the attendants of 
 libertv, and which Authors tell us we muit, 
 fubmit to, as the price of it, are things in very 
 great meafure unknown in England. 
 
 But are not the Englifh perpetually making 
 complaints againfl the Adminiflration ? and 
 do they not fpeak and write as if they were 
 continually expofed to grievances of every 
 kind ? 
 
 Undoubtedly, I mail anfwer, in a Society of 
 Beings fubjedt to error, difTatisfactions will 
 neceflarily arife from fome quarter or other; 
 and in a free Society, they will be openly ma- 
 nifefted by complaints. Befides, as every Man 
 in England is permitted to give his opinion 
 upon all fubjects, and as, to watch over the 
 Adminiflration, and to complain of griev- 
 ances, is the proper duty of the Rcprefenta- 
 tives of the People, complaints muft necef-
 
 OF ENGLAND. 533 
 
 farily be heard in fuch a Government, and 
 even more frequently, and upon more fubjects, 
 than in any other. 
 
 But thofe complaints, it mould be remem- 
 bered, are not, in England, the cries of op- 
 preffion forced at laft to break its filence. 
 They do not fuppofe hearts deeply wounded. 
 Nay, I will go farther, they do not even fup- 
 pofe very determinate fentiments ; and they 
 are often nothing more than the firft vent which 
 Men give to their new, and yet unfettled con- 
 ceptions. 
 
 The agitation of men's minds is not there- 
 fore in England what it would be in other 
 Stares : it is not the fymptom of a profound 
 and general difcontent, and the forerunner of 
 violent commotions. Forefeen, regulated, even 
 hoped for by theConftitution, this agitation ani- 
 mates all the different parts of the State, and is 
 to be considered only as the beneficial viciffi- 
 tude of the feafons. The governing Power being 
 dependant on the Nation, is often thwarted, 
 but fo long as it continues to deferve the af- 
 fection of the People, can never be endangered. 
 Like a vigorous Tree which ftretches its 
 branches far and wide, the flighted breath can 
 put it in motion ; but it acquires and exerts at 
 every minute a new degree of force, and refrfts 
 
 M m 3
 
 S34- THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 the Winds, by the ftrength and elafticity of its 
 fibres, and the depth of its roots. 
 
 In a word, whatever Revolutions may at 
 times happen among the perfons who conduct 
 the public affairs in England, they never oc- 
 cafion the fhorteft ceffation of the power of 
 the Laws, nor the fmalleft diminution of the 
 fecurity of individuals. A Man who fhould 
 have incurred the enmity of the moft power-? 
 ful Men in the State what do I fay ! though 
 he had, like another Vatinius, drawn upon him- 
 felf the united deteftation of all parties, might, 
 under the protection of the Laws, and by keep- 
 ing within the bounds required by them, con- 
 tinue to fet both his enemies and the whole 
 Nation at defiance. 
 
 The limits prefcribed to this book do not 
 admit of entering into any farther particulars 
 on the fubject we are treating here ; but if we 
 were to purfue this enquiry, and examine into 
 the influence which the Englifh Government 
 has on the manners and cufroms of the People, 
 perhaps we mould find that, inflead of infpiring 
 them with any difpofition to diforder cr anar- 
 chy, it produces in them a quite contrary ef- 
 fect, As they fee the higheit Powers in the 
 State, conilantly fubmit to the Laws, and they 
 receive, themfclves, fuch a certain protection
 
 OF ENGLAND, 535 
 
 from thofe laws, whenever they appeal to them, 
 it is impofiible but they mud infenfibly contract 
 a deep-rooted reverence for them, which can 
 at no time ceafe to have fome influence on their 
 adtions. And, in fadt, we fee that even the 
 lower clafs of the People, in England^ notwith- 
 standing the apparent exceifes into which they 
 are fometimes hurried, poffefs a fpirit of juftice 
 and order, fuperior to what is to be obferved in 
 the fame rank of Men in other Countries. The 
 extraordinary indulgence which is mewn to ac- 
 cufed perfons of every degree, is not attended 
 with any of thofe pernicious confequences which 
 we might at firft be apt to fear from it. And it 
 is perhaps to the nature of the Engliih Coirfti- 
 tution itfelf (however remote the caufe may per- 
 haps feem) and to the fpirit of juftice it conti- 
 nually and infenfibly difFufes throughout ail or- 
 ders of the People, that we are to attribute the 
 lingular advantage pofTeffed by the Engliih Na- 
 tion, of employing an incomparably milder 
 mode of adminiftering Juftice in criminal mat- 
 ters than any other Nation, and at "he fame time 
 of affording perhaps fewer initances of violence 
 or cruelty. 
 
 Another confequence which we might o 1 
 ferve here, as flowing alfo from the prlnci 
 
 of the Engliih Government, is the moderate 
 
 M 111 ...
 
 536 THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 behaviour of all thofe who are invefted with any 
 branch of public authority. And if we look 
 at the conduct of all public Officers in England, 
 from the Minifler of State, or the Judge, down 
 to the loweft officers of Juftice, we find a fpirit 
 of forbearance and lenity prevailing in England, 
 among all perfons in power, which cannot but 
 create fome furprize in thofe who have vifitec} 
 other Countries. 
 
 One circumftance more I fhall obferve here, 
 as peculiar to England, which is the confbnt 
 attention of the Legiflature in providing for 
 the interefts and welfare of the People, and the 
 indulgences fhewn by them to their very preju- 
 dices. Advantages thefe, which are no doubt 
 the confequence of the general fpirit which ani- 
 mates the whole Englifh Government, but are 
 alio particularly owing to that circumflance 
 peculiar to it, of having lodged the active part 
 of Legiflation in the Hands of the Represen- 
 tatives of the Nation, and committed the care 
 of alleviating the grievances of the People 
 to perfons who either feel them, or fee them 
 nearly, and vvhofe lure ft path to advancement 
 and plorv is to be active in finding remedies for 
 
 fc> J o 
 
 them. 
 
 Not that I mean, however, that no abufes. 
 fake place in the Englifh Government, and
 
 O F E N G L A N D. 537 
 
 that all poflible good laws are made in it, but 
 that there is a conflant tendency in it, both to 
 correct the one, and improve the other. And 
 that all the laws that are in being, are certainly 
 executed, whenever appealed to, is what I look 
 upon as the character iftic and undifputed advan- 
 tage of the En glim Conilitution. A Confti- 
 tution the more likely to produce all the effects 
 \ye have mentioned, and to procure in general 
 the happinefs of the People, in that it has taken 
 Mankind as they are, and has not endeavoured 
 to prevent every thing, but to regulate every 
 thing: I mall add, the more difficult to dis- 
 cover, becaufe its form was complicated, while 
 its principles were natural and limple. Hence 
 it is that the Politicians of Antiquity, fenfible 
 of the inconveniences of the Governments they 
 had opportunities of knowing, wifhed for the 
 eftablifhment of fuch a Government, without 
 much hopes of ever feeing it effected (a) : nay, 
 Tacitus, the belt Judge of them all, confidered 
 it as a project entirely chimerical (b). Nor was 
 it becaufe he had not thought of it, had not 
 
 (a) " Statuo efTe optime conftitutam Rempublicam quas 
 f< ex tribus generibus illis, regali, optimo, & populari, 
 " modice confufa." Cic. Fragm. 
 
 (b) " Cun&as Nationes Sc Urbes, Populus, aut Priores, 
 ? c aut Singuli, regunt. Dele&a ex his & conilituta Rei-
 
 53$ THE CONSTITUTION 
 
 reflected on it, that he was of this opinion : he 
 had fought for fuch a government, had had a 
 glimpfe of it, and yet continued to pronounce 
 it impracticable. 
 
 LctAis not, therefore, afcribe to the confined 
 views or Man, to his imperfect fagacity, the 
 tiifcovcry of this important fecret. The world 
 might have grown old, generations might have 
 fucceeded generations, ftill feeking it in vain. 
 It has been by a fortunate conjunction of cir- 
 cumilances, I fhall add, by the affiftance of a 
 favourable fituation, that Liberty has at lafl 
 been able to erect herfelf a Temple. 
 
 Invoked by every Nation, but of too delicate 
 a nature, as it mould feem, to fubfifl in Societies 
 formed of fuch imperfect beings as Mankind, 
 lhe fhewed, and but jufl fhe wed herfelf, to the 
 ingenious Nations of antiquity who inhabited 
 the fouth of Europe. They were conftantly 
 miftaken in the form of the worfhip they paid to 
 her. As they continually aimed at extending 
 dominion and conqueft over other Nations, they 
 were no lefs miftaken in the fpirit of that wor- 
 ship; and though they continued for ages to pay 
 
 " publics forma, lsudari f;.cilius quam evenire ; vel fi 
 
 " evenk, haud diutmna efle poteit." -*. Tac. Ann. 
 
 lib. iv.
 
 OF ENGLAND. 539 
 
 their devotions to her, me (till continued, with 
 regard to them, to be the unknown Goddefs. 
 
 Excluded, fince that time, from thofe places 
 to which flic had feemed to give a preference, 
 driven to the extremity of the Weftern World, 
 banifhed even out of the Continent, me has 
 taken refuge in the Atlantic Ocean. There it 
 is, that, freed from the danger of external dis- 
 turbance, and affifted by a happy pre-arrange* 
 ment of things, fhe has been able fully to dif- 
 play the form that fluted her; and fhe has found 
 fix centuries to have been necefiary to the com- 
 pletion of her Work, 
 
 Being fneltered, as it were, within a Citadel, 
 fhe there reigns over a Nation which is the 
 better entitled to her favours as it endeavours 
 to extend her Empire, and carries with it, to 
 every part of its dominions, the bleflings of in- 
 duftry and equality. Fenced in on every fide, 
 to ufe the expreffions of ChamberlaY.ee, with a 
 wide and deep ditch, the fea, guarded with ftrong 
 outworks, its mips of war, and defended by 
 the courage of her Seamen, fhe prefer ves that 
 important tecret, that facred lire, i'o difficult to 
 be kindled, and which, if it were once excin- 
 guifhed, would perhaps never be lighted again. 
 When the World mail have been again laid 
 wafle by Conquerors, me will ftill continue to
 
 54 THE CONSTITUTION, &c. 
 
 fhew Mankind, not only the principle that 
 ought to unite them, but, what is of no lefs im- 
 portance, the form under which they ought to 
 be united. And the Philofopher, when he con- 
 siders the conftant fate of civil Societies amongft 
 Men, and cbferves the numerous and powerful 
 caufes which feem as it were unavoidably to con- 
 duct them all to a ftate of incurable political 
 Slavery, takes comfort in feeing that Liberty 
 has at length difclofed her fecret to Mankind, 
 and fecured an Afvlum to herfelf. 
 
 INDEX.
 
 N D E X, 
 
 AMERICA'S Colonies, their claim of voting fuppl'es 
 
 ^-* to the crown, hurtful, if ebtaiiud, to tiie Engliih 
 conftitution, 522, 1527. What ought to have been the 
 general conduct of minifteis in regard to the colonies, 
 527, ,-28. 
 
 Appeal, in cafe of murder, its effects, and to whom allow- 
 ed, 89. 
 
 Army-, rcilrictions on the power of the king in regjrd to 
 the keeping of ir, 90, qi. The appropriated funds for 
 the p tying of the fame, 91. If not in England, a mean* 
 of fupponing the authority of the crown, 444, ^.n, 
 pajfim* How little its affilfance was ufeful to James II* 
 468, 469. See Military Povjct and Crown. 
 
 Arrejl, method of, in civil caufes by the Engiifb laws, 1 13, 
 116. By the Roman laws, 1 1 6, 118. The alterations 
 in the E:ii;li!h law in that refpec~r, 1 19. 
 
 JJfe?nblies, popular, the difad vantages they lie under in re- 
 gard to their coming to any d-.Tib rate well weighed reL>- 
 lution, 249, 2$j. The advantages a few dift.ir.r'iifh-d 
 citizens have over them, 2^1, 257, 22, 263, 26;.Tully's 
 pafiagc concerning them, 266. See People, Common' 
 ivealt/js, Home. 
 
 Athens, the people do not fcem to have really enjoyed much 
 liberty in that republic, 275. An inftancc or the pro- 
 ceedings of the magiftrates, ioid. 
 .Aula Regis, what kind of court, 15. The cout of Com- 
 mon Picas difmembered from it, 111. The cou t of 
 King's Bench may be conlidered as the remains of it, 
 118. 
 
 Author, occafional perfonal remarks of his, 377, 426, 444., 
 452. His Memorials of Human Sup.erJlitiou quoted, r 1 3. 
 His conversation with Dr. Franklin, 525. 
 
 B. 
 
 Barons, originallv in a great meafu<e independent on the 
 crown, in France, 12. Not lb in England, 15 21.
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Unite in a common caufe with the people, 2|, 23, 338, 
 
 454> 4^5* 
 Beauch:iv:p, lord, procures the palling of a bill for limiting 
 
 perion; 1 arrells, 1 19. 
 Bills, ho. delibeiated upon and framed, 6j, 68, 226, 234, 
 
 268. See Commons and Parliament. 
 Bit of Riglt-y an account of, , 59. Remarkable impar- 
 
 tia iy -r.d univerfality ot its proviiions, 342. 
 Blacijlone, judge, quoted, 69, 82, 145, i 02 , 187, 362, 
 
 5 ho. 
 Burnet, bifhop, quoted, 367, 59;, 469. 
 
 C. 
 
 Cafar, public fpeech of his quoted, 382, 3S3. 
 
 Cenforial power, that eftabliihed in Rome only a fenatorial 
 artifice, 393. See Prefs, l.berty of the. 
 
 Ccnfj'S, .n Rome, might remove a man from one tribe into 
 another, 277, and elect fenators, ibid. See Rome. 
 
 Chart ary, court of, Its office in regard to the flaming of 
 writ;, 129, 1,0. See Equity, courts of. 
 
 Charles I. iketch of his reign, 48, 52. Maintains his 
 ground tlrven years againff. the violent, political, and 
 rehgr'us ipint or nis times, 459, His a :empt to ieize 
 the five members ; the period of the beginning ot the 
 ci' il war?, 462. 
 
 Civil Engiifh law?, divided into unwritten, rmd written 
 law, 107. The fources of the unwritten law, 107, 100. 
 How far the civu 1 :w is a part or" rhe fame, 110. What 
 the wrhten law is, ibid. Peculiarities of the Englifli civil 
 laws, 113, 12 . Refinements and fubtiities in them, 
 120, '22, 128, 13c, 1 3 j, 134, 135, 136. Compared 
 with the old Reman civi! laws, 127, 128. 
 
 Civil power in England, how fuperior to the military, 462, 
 472. 
 
 Civil Roman laws, the conuatit diflike of the Englifh 
 1 nvvers for the-v, 10;, ic-6. Formalities in the ancient: 
 Romanians, 124, 127. Divided into civl and prato- 
 rial laws, i<2, I4.3. The different collections of them, 
 14 '.. Sec Prator. 
 
 Coke, iir Edward, quoted, 145, 176, 187, 227, 295. 
 
 Comities, Phi ip de, quuted, 30, 40. 
 
 Commons, Englifh, their fir ft origin, under Henry HI. and 
 Edward I. 3, 32. How inconliderabie their weight at
 
 INDEX. 
 
 fir ft, 33. This loon increafes, 34. Farther advances, 
 41, 4: . How the houfe is conftitutcd, 61, 62. Vindi- 
 cate the right of taxation again ft the attempts of the 
 crown, 4c, :i. And of the lord*, 85. Their exiff- 
 ence wholly depends upon that right, ibid. The fir ft: 
 inftance of a mifunder [landing between them and the 
 lords in regard to money bills, 80. Commonly grant 
 the king's revenue for life, 79. See Taxation, They 
 cannot vote by proxy, 2:7. Enjoy a freedom of de- 
 bate fupcrior to that ever poflefTed by any popuh.r af- 
 femblv, 2; 5. See Propounding. They are debarred 
 from any fharo in the txecut ve authority, 28c, 281. 
 Are thence 1 d ro ferve the people faithfully, 283, 284. 
 Striking; inflances of this in the laws they have framed 
 at particular times, 3,0, 359, 32. And in their 
 watching ftei wards on their execution, 363. Have im- 
 peached the icrvanis of ;he cro*n and judges-, 363, 
 366. Their proceedings in the cafe of fir John Coven- 
 try, 367. Sec Parliament and Rcprcfentative. Abridge 
 their own perional privileges, 37c. In what thefc privi- 
 leges now confift, ibid. Do ftrict juftice on their own 
 members, 371, 37 3. On what occafion thry repealed the 
 ftatute Dc Hxrctico Comburcndo., 384. Their attacks on 
 the crown's prerogative defeated bv the lords, 39-, 398. 
 They in their turn defeat the like attempts from the 
 lores, 39-, 39S. 
 Commomveahbsy the people in them apt to be mifled by 
 favourite 1- ne'er?, 198, 200. The divilion of the exe- 
 cutive authority that takes place in them, makes it very 
 difficult to lay it tinder proper rcftrair.ts, 215, 216. 
 The people unavoidably betravc-d by thofe whom they 
 truft with power, 27], 277, 2-8, 284. Revolution 
 always corn luded in them in \ diladvantageous manner 
 to public libcrry, 325. See Rev Nations. The laws to 
 fecure the liber.)' of the citizens, befides being imper- 
 fect, are not even carefully executed, 343, &c feq. See 
 Rome. Cmnot fubfift without certain arbitrary power-, 
 contrary to the liberty or the citizens, 421, 422. Dj 
 not admit the liberty of fpeakirtg and writing, and per- 
 haps cannot, 429, 42b. Refpect of perfor.s cannot bz 
 prevented in them in the adminiftration of jufiice, 441, 
 4-i2. The power of the government f ppofed by law 
 to be unbounded till flopped by fome pofuive and de-
 
 t H D X. 
 
 clared regulation, 4.^1, & feq. By what m^ans ccrm- 
 monwealths generally lofe their liberties, 481. Real 
 gre.tr difficulry for the people in them to prcferve their 
 rights 482, 484. See Rome, and Geneva. 
 
 Conqucfi, the, is the real zera or the formation of the prefent 
 Lnglifli government, 7. 
 
 Conjl'itutinn Knglifi), the cei'as of its formaricn, 40, 59. 
 B'.inrr different from that of all other free ftates, cannot 
 fail into ruin from the fame caufes, 473. Caufes that 
 operate tor i s piefei vation, 481, 47. Endangered by 
 the offer- of Columbus to Henry VII. 487, 488. Far- 
 ther reafons of its future pieftrvation, 488, 4' 4. How 
 it rifes again, nf er being in a manner overwhe'mned, 495. 
 Danger- to which it m -y be expofed, 49^, 497. In 
 what circumibmres it may he looked upon as annihil- 
 ated, 498. Middling with it, upon the fcote of im- 
 provement, may prove very dangerous experiments, 
 471, 506, 507. S e Croivn. Would have been altered 
 bv grauiing the American* their claims, 522, 527. See 
 Taxation. Seems to dirTuf- a fpirit of order and juftice 
 aniong the lower cl iTcs of people, 534, 3 5. Such a 
 one uiflicd for by the politicians of antiquity, 557, 
 
 53^- 
 
 Conluly the sera of their creat on, and nature of their office, 
 336. Unr t drained power, 545. See Rome. 
 
 Corona' inn oath, 92. 
 
 Coventry, fir John, his cafe, f6;. Ref ntmen- of the com- 
 mons, and bill thev pals, ibid. An obfervation on that 
 bill, ;6 9 , ; 7 _ . 
 
 Com is of law, in Eiv/l nd, the'r names and function?, in, 
 112. Kept by p '.lament under ftr-ft rules, 37;, 376. 
 The great imputiality of thtir proceedings, 376, 379, 
 A tew i> m..rkab!e alliances, 377, ^79, 380. See Lav.', 
 and "Jurv. 
 
 Cro-r.-jodl, his fruitlefs attempts to form a popular affembly 
 obedient to him, 4^0, 432. 
 
 Crc\v?.', its power much fuperior in England after the Con- 
 quelf. to what it was in Fr.nce, 10, 2c. The borons 
 co r .' j.clled to unite with the communal. y, to reftmin its 
 puver, 21, 24. Irs prefent conftitutional prerogative, 
 7-2, 7:. Reitraints it lies under, 87, 91. Sec King. 
 Totally dependent on tlav peo. le for its fnpplics, 74, 77. 
 Vietulr-.;i"s of its power in preventing any citizen or pj-
 
 INDEX, 
 
 pular leader from acquiring a degree of power danger- 
 ous to public liberty, 202 206. Inftances of it, 214. 
 Is not to make open propofais to parliament, for their 
 aflent or diffent, 239, 240. May fend them mefiages, 
 and to what effect, 237. Its name nor to be introduced 
 to influence debates, 269. Unites in itfelf the whole 
 executive authority, 281, 28:1. Thereby produces an 
 Union in a common ciufe among all orders of fubjects, 
 285 287. Is like an ever-fubfifting Carthage that main- 
 tains the virtue of the representatives ot the people, 
 288. Farther illuitration of the fame fact 356, & leq. 
 367 370. The power of Crowns has not produced thefe 
 effects in other countries, 388. Numerous inftances of 
 this, 388 391. The liability of the executive power 
 of the Englifh crown, 391,- 392. Is a grear peculiarity 
 of it, ibid. Is not a fubject to be explained here other- 
 wife than by facts, 393-395* Its power alternately 
 defended by the two lv ufes, 3^.5, 396. The fecret for- 
 bearance of the two h'>ufes not to invade its preroga- 
 tive, 399, 400. Very remarkable inftances of this, 403 
 409. Its whole authority centres in the fovereign, the 
 privy council only to advife him, or witnefs his opera- 
 tions, 404. Its fecure power rendered confpicuou* in 
 the facility with which it difmifles <rreat men irom their 
 employments, 409, 412. Not fo in other monarchies, 
 ibid. The facility with which it difmifles the parlia- 
 ment, 413 41^. This facility rendered remarkable by 
 the facts that take place in other monarchies, ibid. 
 Never waged war ag-unft, except by p*erfons who pofi- 
 tively laid claim to it, or at lead: upon national grounds, 
 416, 417. Its power more fecure in itfelf, but not fo 
 indelibly annexed to the perfon of an individual as in 
 other countries, 418. The fecret caufes of its peculiar 
 liability is a fubjeel; more properly beb ngin? to philo- 
 sophy than to politics, 419. Great advantages refult 
 from this liability, 42c. I. The numerous reftraints it 
 is able to bear, and great freedom it c..n allow the fub- 
 jec~t at its expense, 421 124. II. The liberty of 
 fpeaking and writing, ca*ried >o the great extent it is 
 in England, 424 428. III. The unlimited freedom of 
 debate in parliament, 429, 434, 435. IV. The union 
 among all orders of fubjects in defence of public liberty, 
 43ii 43^' V* ^^ e unlimited freedom allowed to the 
 
 N n
 
 I N D E X. 
 
 people, of meddling with government affairs, 438440. 
 VI. The impartiality with whkh juftice is dealt, with- 
 out refpe&o f peribns, 440 444. VII. Needleflhefs of 
 an armed force to fupport its power, 397, 444, & feq. 
 456 472. VI1L Its ftridt refpecf eren for the letter of 
 the law, 451, 456. IX. The leuity ufed in the admini- 
 flration of criminal juftice may perhaps be afcribed in 
 great part to the general feeurity the ftable power of the 
 crown gives to the whole machine of government, 454. 
 The great power the crown formerly derived from its 
 dominions beyond fea, fupplied afterwards by hidden cir- 
 cumftances at home, 455, 458. Inftances of this great 
 power without the fupport of an armed force, 458, 462. 
 It keeps the military power in a furprizing ftate of fub- 
 ieftion to the law, 462 467. Inttancea of this, ibid. 
 Really could not, in the general fituation of things, de- 
 rive any affiftance from a itanding army againft the peo- 
 pie* 467, 468. The method it mould adopt for fetting 
 afide the pre fen t conftitution, 469, 470. Its power is 
 wholly annexed to the civil branch of its office, 458, 
 
 471. Hints concerning its effectual foundations, 471, 
 
 472. Prevents the Englifii conftitution from being de- 
 (1 roved in the fame manner the Roman republic was, 
 477. The great ufefulnefs of its veto power, 487. 
 Confiderations on the attempts to abridge its prerogative, 
 498. In what circumlfances thefe attempts might be 
 brought to fucceed, 499, 500. A comparifon between its 
 prerogative, and that of the kings of Sweden, before the 
 lalt revolution, 501 504. The abridging of its prero- 
 gative might not anfwer the expectations of thofe poli- 
 ticians who wifh for it, 501, & feq. Sketches of the 
 dangers to public liberty that might arife therefrom, 505, 
 511. The rule to be followed in purfuing fuch attempts, 
 511, 512. How dependent on the people for its fup- 
 plies, fee Taxation. 
 
 Cunningham's Law Dictionary quoted, 129, 152. 
 
 D 
 
 Dthate, freedom of, fecurcd by the bill of rights, 97. See 
 Propounding. How conducted in the Englifh parliament, 
 66 68, 267 269. The unlimited freedom exercifed 
 in the Englifh parliament nor followed by any b*d conic. 
 qu:nces, and why, 434, 435.
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Dictators, their great power, 264, 346. Their abfolute 
 power was often ufeful, 421, 422. See Rome. 
 
 DifoUtion of the parliament, its effects, 65. Eafily effected 
 by the crown in England, 414, 415. 
 
 Douglas, earls of, cauiea to be flain by king James II. of 
 Scotland, 411. 
 
 E. 
 
 EdivardL furnamed the Englifll Juffihiah, 31. 
 
 Elections, laws relating to them, 63, 64, 98. GrenvilWshWX 
 
 for deciding contefted elections, 99. Advantages arifing 
 
 from the right of the people to elect reprefentatives, 289, 
 
 290, 308 314. See People. 
 
 Elizabeth, queen, the inquifitorial court of High Commijfiort 
 
 eftabliflied during her reign, 46. 
 Emancipation of. tons, in Rome, manner of, 140, 141. 
 England, the power of the king becomes very great at the 
 aera of the conqucft, 13. The lords or barons much de- 
 pendent on the crown, 15. Are thence compelled to 
 unite in a common caufe with the people, 21 -i\. Dif- 
 ferent from France, in that it formed one compact united 
 kingdom, 26. This circumilance favours the eftablifh- 
 ment of public liberty, ibid. A peculiarity of its go- 
 vernment, viz. the advantageous manner to public liberty 
 in which revolutions have conftantly been concluded, 
 324, 337343. See Revolutions. The flriclnefs with 
 which laws favourable to the liberty of the fubject are 
 executed, 343', & feq. 357, & feq. See Commons. Re- 
 markable impartiality in the courts of law, 376 378. 
 Inttances quoted, 377, 380. Farther ftricturcs on the 
 fame fubject, 442 444. The people may be faid in Eng- 
 land to be inverted with both the judicial and cenf'rial 
 powers, 428, 429. Singular law doclrine concerning the 
 authority" of government, and the liberty of the fubject, 
 451 457. The people's iituation different from that of 
 the people in Rome, 475, 476. See People. The ba- 
 lance of the people in government is connected with the 
 right of property, 481. See Taxation. Di virions among 
 the people never carried very far, 532, 534. The lower 
 clafs pofl'eiled of a conliderable fpirit of order and juftice, 
 
 534^ S35- 
 Equity, courts of, an enquiry into the meaning of the word, 
 
 attd their real office, 137, 138. A court of this kind ex- 
 
 N n z
 
 INDEX. 
 
 jfted in Rome,. 138, 139. See P rector. Remedies af* 
 forded by the Englifli courts of equity, 147, 144. How 
 thefe courts were fii ft inftituted, ibid. The opposition 
 they meet, 145. Their method of proceeding to enforce 
 appearance, and fubmiffion to their decrees, 145, 146. 
 Are kept within much more uricf bounds than the prae- 
 /ar'jequity court was in Rome, 150 152. Farther de- 
 finition of th'tir effice, 152, H4. 
 Executive power, lodged in the king, is more eafily repreffed 
 when confined to a fole indiviiible feat, 215, & fcq. is" 
 taken out of the hands of the reprefentatives of the 
 people, 280, 281. Great advantages thence ariling, 280, 
 285. See C,mvn. 
 
 F. 
 
 Fair fans dire, the motto quoted, 528. 
 
 Favourite of the people, how prevented in the Engliih con* 
 flitution from acquiring a power dangerous to public li- 
 berty, 2 6, & feq. , See Commonwealths. 
 
 Fclton, his anl.wer to the bifhop of London, ;8i. 
 
 Feudal government introduced in France through a long 
 feries of events and years, 10. Is introduced fuddenly 
 and at once; in England by the Conqueit, 13. Conie* 
 quences of thefe differences, 15. 
 
 France, the ftudal government was eflablifhed in it in a 
 very flow manner, and how, 10, 11. The crown was at 
 firft elective, n. The authority of the king originally 
 very inconfiderable, 12, 16, 17. The lords or barons 
 were in great meafure independent on the crown, ibid. 
 Thefe cireumfiances prejudicial to the liberty of the peo- 
 ple, ibid. 18 20. Is formed by an aggregation of 
 many different fovereignties, 18, 19. See Reunions. The 
 remarkable treaty by which the war for the public good 
 was terminated, :o. General eftates, how conltituted, 34. 
 The third eftate or commons never polTefTed or any 
 weight, ibid. A remarkable infurrection, 36. The con- 
 Ititution of France about the time of Hi!gh Capet, much 
 the fame with that of the German empire at prefenr, 39. 
 .What they call Edits enngifires y 70. French parliament, 
 what, ibid. Late king's expedient for difmifling the par- 
 liament of Paris, 413, 414. The jealoufy of the crown 
 againft that aflembly, 432, 433. Companion between the
 
 INDEX. 
 
 French and Englifh constitution in regard to the right of 
 
 tax;.. Ion, 45, 516 520. 
 Frankiin, Dr. quoted, 523, 521;. 
 French language introduced inro the Englifh laws by William 
 
 the Conqueror, 69. Is ftiil ufed by the king in declaring 
 
 his intention to the parliament, 68. judge Biackftone's 
 
 paffage on that fubjecl, ibid. 
 
 G. 
 
 George I. king, led into an imprudent ftep, 398, 499, 
 
 General warrants, fet afide, 486. 
 
 Geneva, republic of, mentioned, 230,25^,307,486. 
 
 Germany.) by what caufe the growth of the power of the 
 crown has been checked there, 39. Its prefent ftate 
 compared with thai or France in the time of Hugh Capet, 
 ibid. 
 
 Grecian commonwealths, revolutions in them only favour- 
 able to the particular interefts ot leaders and dema- 
 gogues, 336. The reproach made them by Cselar, 382, 
 
 383. 
 Gracchi, how forfaken by the people, 265. 
 Grand Jury, its office, 170. 
 Guife, duke of, flain by order of K. Henry III. of France, 
 
 411, 412. 
 
 H. 
 
 Habeas Corpus ae*r, when paiTed, and for what purpofe, 
 192. The tenor of it, 192 194. The particular occa- 
 sion of it, 362. ExpieMions ot judge Blacklrone on the 
 fubject, ibid. Quoted by Junius, ibid. On what occaiion 
 fufpended, and with what caution, 424. By what means 
 finally fettled, 4S6. 
 
 Hale, Judge quoted, 31. His defcription of the office of a 
 Jury, 17*. 
 
 Hemy I. grants a charter to his iubjects, what condition he 
 annexes to it, 24. 
 
 Henry VIII. his great power, 45. Was unfupported by a 
 [landing army, 390. 
 
 Holt, judge, remarkable opinion delivered by him, 318. 
 
 Hugh Capet, the fiift nereditary king in Fiance, 11, The 
 haughty aofwer of a French lord to him, 13. 
 
 N n 3
 
 I N D X. 
 
 fluvic, Mr. a few words on the character given by him of 
 James II. 460. 
 
 Jacob's law ditfionary quoted, 128, 152. 
 
 James I. liberty begins to revive in his reign, 47. Hi$ 
 lofty notions concerning regal authority, ibid. Keeps 
 his ground againfr the refllefs fpirit of the times, 459. 
 
 James II. how his dethronement was etre:tec:, 55, 57. 
 Was inexcufeable in his conduct, 460. A few more words 
 on the manner of his being dethroned, 4^9, 460. Re- 
 ceives no manner of aliiftance from his numerous army, 
 4Q>', 469. 
 
 Jcjuits, how expelled from Spain, 415, 416. 
 
 Impeachment, public, what, and its effects, 93, 94. The 
 king's pardon no bar to the proiecution ot an impeach- 
 ment, 95. Can it prevent the execution of the judg- 
 ment? ibid. Inftances ot mini!icts and judges impeached 
 by the commons, 93, 94, 363 366. 
 
 In.prifonmcnt, the method formerly uied for liberating im- 
 prisoned pcrfons, 189. They were inefficient againft 
 the power of the privy council, 190. A new force given 
 them by the petition of rights, ibid. Evaded again by 
 means of an alias and a pluries, 191. Habeas corpus act, 
 192. 
 
 John, king, grants the great charter, 26, 27. 
 
 John/on, Dr. Samuel, his opinion concerning the office of 
 the courts of equity, examined, 137. 
 
 Journaloi the commons. Their addrefs to the crown in 
 regard to the printing" of the fame, 408. 
 
 Judges, how they may be removed fvom their offices, 79. 
 Tiieir office in criminal caufes is only to direct the jury, 
 and afterwards to pronounce the law, 179, i8o % Decide 
 in Fel-on's cafe the torture cannot be ufed, 18 !. Cannot 
 alter the mode of punilhment, 182. Inftances of judges 
 impeached, 363 366. Sec Courts, 
 
 Judicial power, in regard to criminal matters, the neceffary 
 cautions in eftabiiibing iuch power, 154, & feq. Should 
 not be tiufud, efpecially in a free ftute, to any too 
 powerful perfi ns or bedie?, 163, & feq. Allufions to the 
 foreign courts of law, 164, 167. See Trial. May be 
 faid in England to be in the hands of nobody, 1F4. Lodg- 
 ed in the peo; le, 428, 429. 
 
 Junius'* letter, quoted, 176, 362.
 
 I N D E X* 
 
 Jury, how they are to fliape their verdicSt, 175. Mull decide 
 both upon the faft and the criminality of it, 176. What 
 rules muft follow in their opinions, 178. Judge Hales'* 
 remarkable paffage in that fefpect, ibid. Ufually pay a 
 great regard to the judge's direction, 186. The effect of 
 their recommending to mercy, ibid. See Trial and Ju- 
 dicial Power. 
 
 Jujiice, impartiality of its adminiftration in England, 376 
 380, 442, 443. See Lavj and Judicial Power. 
 K.. 
 
 King, his prerogative by the conftitution 72, 73. The 
 reftridiion let by law upon the exercife of the fame, 87 
 91, Commonly granted a revenue for life, 79. Not to 
 interfere, nor his privy^council, in the decifion of caufes 
 either civil or criminal, 88, It is difpuied whether he 
 can remit the profecution of a fentence awarded in. con- 
 fequence of an impeachment, 95. Not to be named in 
 debates, 26g. The laft inftance of one ufing hjs negative 
 voice, 405. See Croivn. 
 
 Laws. See Legijlation. Difficulty in procuring juft ones, 
 248. A very necefl'ary caution in framing them, 279, 280. 
 
 Law, criminal, how ftruTtly the letter of it is adhered to 
 in England, without any extenfion, 180, 318, 45 3 T 
 Great mildnefs of it, 185187. See Punijhments. 
 
 Legijlative power, how formed in England, 61, & feq, Adr 
 vantages arifing from its being divided, 218, & feq. Re- 
 markable conltartcy in its ^operations in England, 223, 
 Not lb in the ancient commonwealths, ibid. See Par- 
 liament. 
 
 Legijlation, the bufinefs of, conducted in England upon, 
 quite different principles from what it is in the republican 
 governments, 229. The manner in which laws are fram- 
 ed in commonwealths, 229, 230. Inconveniency of it, 
 
 231. The manner in which laws are framed in England, 
 
 232. Advantages of the fame, 234230, See P,o- 
 founding. Would it be an advantage if laws were en* 
 a&ed by the people at large, 2^.0, 246 2^6. See 
 People. 
 
 Liberty, the word much mifapplied or mifunderftcoi, 241, 
 244. A truer definition ot the fame, 245, 246. How 
 the provisions to (ecure it ihould be dirccled, 279. 
 
 N n 4
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Singular law doctrine in England concerning the liberty 
 of the fubject, 4; i -457. 
 Livy quoted, 253, 264, 329, 332, 334, 346, 347, 
 
 348. 
 
 Lords, the houfe of, how conftituted, 65. Not fuffered by 
 the commons to frame, or even alier a money-bill, 67. 
 Make it a (landing order to reject all money-bills to 
 which bills of another nature have been tacked, 77, 78, 
 396. Have not given up their claim in regard to alrrring 
 mo ey -bills, 86. The grtat pre-eminence, allowed them 
 in p' int of ceremony over the commons, 226, 227. Can 
 vote by proxy, ibid. Unite in a common caufe with the 
 people, againfl the power of the crown, 21, 22, 49, 50, 
 285 287, 363 370. Abridge their own perfonal privi- 
 leges, 373. Their impartiality in their judicial capa- 
 city, 374, 375. Cannot be charged with having abufed 
 their privilege of trying their own members, 374, 3^5. 
 Defeat the attempts of the commons on the crown's pre- 
 rogative, 395 398. Their wn attempts defeated by 
 the commons, 397, 398. A bill is framed to limit 
 their number, 398, 499. The great importance of 
 th.it bill generally overlooked, co6, 507. See Par~ 
 Vament and Peers, 
 
 Lyttleton, lord, quoted, 315. 
 
 M. 
 
 Macbiavefs Hiflory of the Republic of Florence, quoted, 
 2 o. 
 
 Magna Charta, when and how obtained, .6, 27. An ac- 
 count of it, 27 z > Remarkable extenlivenefs and 
 impartiality of its provifions, 338. 
 
 Marlborough, eafily difmiffed from his employments, 214, 
 409, 410. 
 
 Martial, courts, a remarkable difpute between one and a 
 couitoflaw, 464, 465. 
 
 Martial law, mull be univerfal, where the authority of the 
 government is fupported by a {landing army, 447, 448. 
 
 Members of the houfe of commons, their perfonal privi- 
 leges, 370. Inftance of fome punifhed by their own 
 houfe, 371, 372. Set Commons. 
 
 Military power, a caufe of anxiety to thofe fovereigns whofe 
 authority is fupported by it, 446 448. Cannot in fuch 
 c;ife be fubjected to the civil power, 462, 463. Its need- 
 leflhefs to fupport the power of the crown in England,
 
 I N D EX. 
 
 390, 456 462. The furprifmg fubjecYion of it to the 
 civil power in England, 390, 462 467. See Cro-zvn. 
 Mtni/ter, equally interefted with other fubje&s in maintain- 
 ing the laws concerning perfonal fecurity, 285. A dif- 
 earded one in other countries, the caufe of fome anxiety 
 or jealoufy to the government, 412. Not fo in England, 
 412, 440. 
 
 Monarchies, revolutions always concluded in them by pro- 
 vifions for the advantage of great men and leaders, not 
 of the people, the f ime as in commonwealths, 337, 402, 
 435 "437* The executive power of the crown in all an- 
 cient or modern monarchies, wanting that peculiar frabi- 
 lity of the Englifli crown, 388. Numerous inftances of 
 it, 388 391. Not fee u red otherwife than by Handing 
 armies ibid. The monarchs are afraid of powerful fub- 
 jecis, 411, 412. Cannot do without fome arbitrary 
 means of afferting their authority, 422. Very jealous 
 of the liberty of the prefs, and perhaps are really obli- 
 gated to be fo, 424, 425. Extremely averfe, out or fear 
 for their own fecurity, to calling popular aflemblies to 
 take advice and affiftance from, 429 433. yelped of 
 perfons in the administration of juflice cannot be pre- 
 vented in them, 441, 442. Anxious precautions taken 
 in them in regard to the military power, 446448. 
 Their law doctrine concerning the executive authority of 
 the government, 451, 454. The military fuperior to the 
 civil power, 462, 463. 
 
 Money Bills, not to be altered by the lords, 67, 86. Not 
 to be tacked to other bills, 77, 78, 396. See Taxation.^ 
 
 Montcfiuieu, quoted, 293, 472. 
 
 More's Utopia, quoted, 293. 
 
 O. 
 
 OJlrac'ifm, an arbitrary unjuft expedient, but perhaps ne- 
 
 cefl<iry in the republic of Athens, 422. 
 Oxenflurn, chancellor, his words to his fon, 527. 
 
 Parliament, Englifh, the confiitution of, 61 70. How to 
 be called, 63, 87. How bills are pafTed, fee Bill, 
 Proceedings in parliament not to be queftioned in any 
 other place or court, 97. The fecret bent of that af-
 
 INDEX. 
 
 fembly to forbear invading the prerogative of the crown, 
 405*7409. By the conffitution, force is removed from 
 thejr cebates, 449, Cautious conduct of the three 
 branches towards each other, 529, 531. See Commons 
 and Crotvn. i 
 
 Parliam ?tts, French, what they are, 70. That of Paris, 
 the motives of its fir ft inftitution, ibid. Is only an aflem- 
 bly of a juaiciary nature, ibid. What kind of fhare it 
 claims in legiflation, ibid. The great weight of that 
 afTembly, 163. Difficult to be managed by the crown, 
 ibid. How the late king difmiffed ir, 413, 414. Pre- 
 cautions taken by the prefent king in relloring it, 433. 
 See France* 
 
 Parliamentary Hiftory of England, a fuperficial obfervation 
 of its authors, 340. 
 
 Pardon, the prerogative of, lodged in the king, 72. Can- 
 not be pleaded as a bar to an impeachment being canied 
 on, 95. Doubtful whether it can flay the execution of 
 a fentence awarded in confequence of an impeachment, 
 ibid. Often granted on the recommendation of a jury, 
 186". 
 
 Peers, how to be tried ? 179. Have few real perfonal pri- 
 vileges above the fubject, 373. See Lords. 
 
 People, how milled by favourites or demagogues, 198 200. 
 How influenced or deceived by the magiftrates, or great 
 men in commonwealths, 250 257. Should act through 
 reprefentatives, 246. 259. Should entirely delegare the 
 Jegiflative authority to thefe, 26c 27.'. How and in 
 what circumftances only, the right of rejifiancs may be 
 ufefully exdted by them, 320 324. See Commonwealths, 
 and England. May be faid in England to poffefs both 
 the judicial and cenforial powers, 428,429. The free- 
 dom they enjoy of interfering in government matters, 
 438 440. 
 
 Pope, Mr. quoted, 2-0. 
 
 J.ex Porcia de tergo civium, 274. 318. 
 
 Praemunire, the different meanings of the word, 194. 
 
 Prator, his office in Rome, 116. Aflumes the office of a 
 judge of equity, 139. His provifions, 139 142. Their 
 power very arbitrary, 147. When firit retrained, 147 ? 
 
 IJ 9- ... 
 P; ffs, liberty of the, is a real cenfori.il power lodged in tht 
 
 people, 29 1, 292. Much more effe&ctai jthan the one
 
 I N T> x. 
 
 eftablifhed in Rome, 293. And more ufeful by far to 
 the community, 293, 294. How difficultly this liberty 
 wS gained at the expence of the executive power, 294, 
 295. A licencer appointed upon the prefs by the ftar- 
 ch amber, 2,5. By the long parliament, ibid. By 
 Charles L . ..id James II. Finally eftab'.ifhed in the 
 year u 4, and how, 296. A definition of it, 296, 297. 
 Actions reflecting the lame not to be decided without a 
 jury, 297, 298. How extentive its ufe has become, 299. 
 300. Very great political advantages arifing from the 
 lame, 301 305. Is farther ufetul, combined with the 
 other rights of the people, 305 308. Such as the right 
 of election, 308, 309. How ufeful a fupport to the right 
 of refinance, 319, 320. Is not allowed in common- 
 wealths, andwh). 425,426. Nor in monarchies, 424, 
 425. Its being tolerated in England to fo high a degree, 
 depends on the liability of the executive power of the 
 crow r n, 427. By its means the cenforial power may be 
 faid to be lodged in the people, 4.28, 429. The real 
 foundation on which it re its in England, 452, 453. Er- 
 ror of the author, at firft, in this ielpef, ibid. 
 
 Prijoner, how to be committed, 169, 170. When once 
 acqu.tted, cannot be tried again for the fame offence, 179. 
 See Trial. 
 
 Privy council, its power abridged by the fame act which 
 aboliihed the itar-chamber, 88. Its real office in the 
 Engiifh government, 404. How formed, ibid. 
 
 Prorogation, its effects, 65. The term not to be afterwards 
 fhortcned, 87. 
 
 Propounding, in legiflation the privilege of, referved to the 
 executive power in commonwealths, 229 231. Allotted 
 in the Engiifh conftitution to the reprefentatives of the 
 people, 232 2^6. How the fame was formerly fettled in 
 Frame, Sweden, Scotland, and Ireland, 235. Great ad- 
 vantages accruing to public liberty from this right being- 
 lodged in the reprefentatives of the people, 232 240, 
 269 271. Its remarkable advantages for preferving the 
 Engiifh conftitution, and inftances of it, 482 486. 
 
 PuniJbmentSy the judge cannot alter the mode of, 182. Nor 
 the fheiiff, ibid. Do not extend beyond the fimple de- 
 privation of life, 187. Their mildneis in England, 381. 
 Not fo among the Greeks and Romans, 381, 382. At- 
 tention of the Engiifh legiflature in that refpet, 385, 386.
 
 INDEX. 
 
 R. 
 
 Reprcfcntati'veS) qualifications for being one, 6z. Advan- 
 tages that .iccrUv ro the people from acting through re- 
 prcfentatives, t.b 25 , 259. More hurtful than bene- 
 ficial when their intereft is not in reality united wih that 
 of the people, 259. The people fhould entireh delegate 
 the legiflative authority'to tht m, 261 267. The fedate 
 manner in wh'ch in England they debate the fubjecls and 
 vote, 268. Do not allow he fpeaker to have a vote, 269. 
 Nor the king's name to be introduced in debates, ibid. 
 Are debarred from all executive authority, 28b, 281. 
 Capital advantages ihence arihng, 280, & feq. 2S7, 288. 
 See Commons and Peple. 
 Refiftnnce^ right of, admitted by the Englifh laws, 314 3 16. 
 Opinion of judge Blackllone quoted, 317. Re . ognized 
 even by the courts of law, 318. Is in a great meafure 
 an ufelefs right, unief- combined with the liberty of the 
 prefs, 319 320. What circumftr.nces are required for 
 its being Lift full) exerted, 3 o 324. 
 Revolutions have always been concluded in England in an 
 advantageous manner to public -ibcrty , 324. A leiies of 
 inftances, 337 343. Not fo in the Roman common- 
 wealth, 37.;. A feries of inftances during t fie whole 
 time of its duration, 324 336. The f me dTdvantage 
 obra ns in the Greek republcs, ,36. And in the limited 
 monarchies of Europe, fuch as Scotland, Sweden, &c 
 337, 400402, 435437. 
 Revolution of the year 1^89. How accompli fhed and im- 
 proved, 59, 342. 343, 403. See Revolutions. 
 Re-unions, of particular provinces to the crown, in Fnmce, 
 1 8, 19. I he manner of thefe re-unions, and doctrine of 
 the French lawyers in that reflect, ibid. 
 Rome, wrong m ions of liberty the patricians and fenare 
 give to the people, 241. The fenate inverts itfelf with 
 the power of laying taxes, and on what oceafion, 253. 
 The tribunes do not enact laws without the concurrence 
 of the people. 261. The influence of fenators and great 
 men over the people, and their artifices, .62 20^, 267. 
 The people, and e^en the tribunes, greatly over-awed by 
 a dictator, 261. The people betrayed by thofe in whom 
 they milled, 272. The tribunes not earneft in the de- 
 fence of public iiberty, 273. The fenate, confuls, and
 
 i 1st d e x* 
 
 dictators, poiTelTed >>f an arbitrary power over the lives cf 
 the citizens, 274. AfT'me occalionally a power to take 
 from the Capitol, and fet alide the laws enabled by the 
 people, 275, 276. Who we're called nobilts, 216, 278* 
 The cenfo.rial power only a piece of enatorial craft, 293. 
 Revolutions conftantly concluded in a difadvantageous 
 manner to public liberty, 325. A feries of inftances, 
 32^ 336. The laws concerning the liberty of the citi- 
 zens were not flrirUy executed. 344.. A feries of in- 
 ftances, 345, & feq. Remarkable inlt nice of infolence and 
 cruelty of a magistrate, 349. The rapacioufnefs of the 
 men in power in regard to the allies and lubjecls of tho 
 republic, 350. Corruption of the judges, 351, 352. 
 Remarkable changes of the formation of them, ibid. A 
 remarkable palfage of Tuily in regard to the dif >rders 
 that took place in the republic, 354. A ftiort fketch of 
 their real caufe, 355, 356. Dangers to which both its 
 liberty and empire were expofed, 474, 475. How the 
 final overthrow of the republic was operated, 476, 477. 
 The political rights allotted to the people, 479. 
 
 Roufjeau cjunted, 225, 241, 261, 29;, 4^4. 
 
 Rnjjian ambailador, the cafe of his an eft, 380. 
 
 S. 
 
 Saxon government, abolished in England by the Norman 
 Conquefl", 7. Paffages of fir William Temple, and Spei- 
 man, on that fubjeel:, ibid. How far reftored fince the 
 Conquefr, 8, 9. 
 
 Scotland, the number of reprefentfitives it fends to Parlia- 
 ment, 62. The lords of the articles, what affbmbly, 233* 
 The authority of the crown commonly invaded by the 
 nobles, 402. The bill that had been framed for fettling 
 the crown on the houfe of Hanover, 402, 403. No ad- 
 vantageous expedient to have trufted the nobility with 
 the command of a ftaiuling army, ,149. 
 
 Secretary ot (late, cafe of an attion brought ;igain(t one, by a 
 private individual, 379. 
 
 Senate, Roman, how formed, 277. See Rome. Their 
 conduct at the expulfion of the kirgs, 52 , 326. See 
 Revolutions. The great p wcr they arT.nned over the 
 lives of the citizens, 274, 347. 
 
 Sev.'vne, mad. de, quoted, 52c, 521. 
 
 5
 
 t N D E X. 
 
 Smithy Dr. Adam, his opinion on liberty, and on the effeSti 
 produced by a landing army examined, 444' 450. 
 Farther obfervations on the fame fubjectin general, 457 
 472. 
 
 Spain, how that monarchy was formed, 38. The expedi- 
 ent ufcd by the prefent king for difmiffing the Jefuits, 
 415, 416. 
 
 Spclman, quoted, 7. 
 
 Star-Chamber, the court of, how conftituted, 51. Sup- 
 pieffed the liberty of the prefs, 295. Exp'reifions of 
 fir Edward Coke concerning it, ibid. Was a kind of 
 a court of equity in regard to criminal matters, 455, 
 456. By what means abolifhed, 485. 
 
 Statute de herctko comburendo, on what reafon repealed, 384, 
 That for allowing parliaments to meet 01 themfelves, re- 
 pealed, 406. 
 
 Svjedoii an account of the Revolutions that hare taken place 
 in its government, and of the reftraints at times put on 
 the authority of the crown, 400, 401. The difadvantages 
 of the body of the people in the legiflature, 480. An 
 account of its government before the laft Revolution, 
 501504. 
 
 Swift, dean, quoted, 410. 
 
 T. 
 
 Tacitus, quoted, 43, C37. 
 
 Taxation, right of, when firft fecured to the lords and com- 
 mons, 35. Poffeffed in England by a fingle parliament, 
 not feveral affemblies as in France, 44, 45. Is rendered 
 thereby a much more efficacious check upon the crown, 
 ibid. All taxes or money bills rauft originate in the 
 houfe of commons, as well as the alterations in fuch bills, 
 67. The great conftitutional efficiency of that right, 
 74 -4. The exiftence of the commons wholly depends 
 upon the fame, 85. The advantages ofr this right 
 of the commons, when combined with the right of 
 propounding law remedies, 235, 236. How firmly it fe- 
 cures all the other rights of the people, and the whole 
 cbnfiitution againfl the attempts of the crown, 4S1, & feq. 
 487. Is the conftitutional balance of the people againft 
 the crown, 513. At the fame time the only forcible 
 one, 514, 515, 527. Rendered ineffectual when lodged
 
 I N D EX. 
 
 in fevcral difKnc*l provincial affemblies 4;, 517 5 2d. 
 How might grow to be fo divided in England, 522. 
 The granting the Americans their claims would have al- 
 tered the Englifh conftitution, 522 527. 
 
 Temple, Cr William, quoted, 7. 
 
 Torture, attempted to be introduced in the reign of Henry 
 VI. by the dukes of Exeter and of Suffolk, 181. De- 
 cided to be illegal by the judges, ibid. 
 
 Treafon, high, ftatutes concerning it repealed, 46, 82. How 
 trials for cafes of treafon are to be conducted, 174, 175. 
 
 Tribunes, betray the caufe of the people, 272 27c;. The 
 asra of their creation, 322. Their intereited public con- 
 duct, 32S 336. See Rome. 
 
 Trial by jury revived in the reign of Henry II. 25. How 
 to be conducted, 171, & feq. Muft be public, 182. 
 Great advantages of this infHtution, 185, 184. How 
 ftrictly preferved in England, 357, 358. Not fo in Nor- 
 mandy, Sweden, and Scotland, 358. See Judicial Power 
 and Jury. 
 
 Trials, the manner in which ptifoner* are tried in foreign 
 
 countries, 166, 167. 
 Tucker, dean, 521. 
 Tudors, the great power of the princes of that houfe, 43, 45, 
 
 458. Were not alii tied by any armed force, 390, 45 S. 
 Tully, quoted, 125, 142, 263, 266, 276, 349, 354, 537. 
 
 V. 
 
 Valjlein, duke of, caufed to be flain by the emperor Ferdi- 
 nand II. 41 1. 
 
 Perdi3 7 how to be expreffed, 176. A fpecial one, what, 
 ibid. A paffage of Coke on the fubject., ibid. 
 
 W. 
 
 William the Conqueror, fets afide the Saxon, and fubftitutes 
 the feudal government, 7, &: feq. PofTefTed of an uncom- 
 monly great authority, 14. What regulations he intro- 
 duces into England, 13 ic. 
 
 Writers, political, their ill-judged expreffions and notions, 
 24 1 243. Their unwife admiration of the ctnforial 
 power in Rome, 293. Have not penetrated into the real 
 foundation of the fcience of politics, 473. Have treated
 
 INDEX. 
 
 It was an occult kind of fcience, as natural philofophy 
 was, in the time of Ariftotle, 497. Anecdote of one, 
 
 453* 
 Writs, their importance in the Englifh courts of law, 127, 
 
 130 1 33. Compared to the Roman Aftioms lcgis t 127* 
 
 The difficulty in creating new writs, 132, 133. 
 
 Jf X N I $.
 
 THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below 
 
 MAR 1 1 1948 
 MAR 23 1948 
 
 WAR 1 <; 1955 
 
 THE LIBRARY
 
 JN 
 
 117 
 
 L83c 
 
 1758 
 
 A A 000124 669 3