HHHBHIB&IHBB HT UC-NRLF 736 MANUAL OF BRITISH BOTANY CONTAINING THE FLO WEEING PLANTS AND FEENS AEEANGED ACCOEDING TO THE NATUEAL OEDEES BY THE LATE CHARLES CARDALE BABINGTON M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S. Professor of Botany in the University of Cambridge NINTH EDITION ENLARGED FROM THE AUTHOR'S MANUSCRIPTS AND OTHER SOURCES EDITED BY HENRY AND JAMES GROVES LONDON GUENEY & JACKSON, PATEENOSTEE EOW (SUCCESSORS TO MR VAN VOORST) BIOLOGY " Quod ad me attinet, ingenue fatear, me in rebus dubiis de speciflca differentia nuniquam consulere Auctores, qui in herbariis plantis multis, sed eos modo, qui in natura plantis multum student. At iis, qui ad pneceptas opiniones ei-perien- tiam suam concinnant et in singulo extern* faeiei lusu, neglectis notis t-ssentiali lu, formas transitorias vident, paruin fido." FRits. PiilNTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEl.T STREET. i PREFACE BIOLOGY ! [to the Eighth Edition]. Ix this work it has been the Author's wish to adopt in all cases those names which have the claim of priority, unless good cause should be shown for a contrary proceeding ; and with this object he has carefully examined nearly all the best European Floras, comparing our plants with the de- scriptions contained in them, and in most cases with foreign specimens of undoubted authenticity. In the adop- tion of genera and species an endeavour has been made, by the examination of the plants themselves, to determine which are to be regarded as truly distinct, thus, it is hoped, taking Nature as a guide. Still, let it not be sup- posed that any claim is made to peculiar accuracy, or that the Author considers himself qualified to dictate to any student of botany ; for he is well aware that there are many points upon which persons who have carefully studied the subject form different conclusions from those to which he has been led. The progress of our knowledge has caused changes in the nomenclature in successive editions of this book and in the Author's views of the value of forms as species or varieties. The inconvenience of these alterations to all, especially to statistical botanists, is fully admitted ; but the Author does not know of any mode by which it cart be avoided if each edition is to be brought up as completely as is in his power to the contemporary knowledge of our plants. No alterations have been admitted until careful a2 5*8 IV PREFACE. study has convinced the Author that they are required. He may have fallen into error, but has earnestly endea- voured to discover the truth. Attempts have been made greatly to reduce the number of recognized species found in Britain ; but the results ob- tained seem to be so totally opposed to the teaching of the plants themselves, and the evidence adduced in their favour is so seldom more than a statement of opinion, that they cannot safely be adopted ; nor does the plan of the present work admit of a discussion, of the many questions raised by them. Also it has been laid down as a rule by some botanists, that no plant can be a species whose dis- tinctive characters are not as manifest in an herbarium as when it is alive. We are told that our business as descriptive botanists is not " to determine what is a species/' but simply to describe plants so that they may be easily recognized from the dry specimen. The Author cannot agree to this rule. Although he, in common with other naturalists, is unable to define what is a species, he believes that species exist, and that they may often be easily distinguished amongst living plants, although some- times separated with difficulty when dried specimens alone are examined. He thinks that it is our duty as botanists to study the living plants whenever it is possible to do so, and to describe from them ; to write for the use and in- struction of field- rather than cabinet-naturalists ; for the advancement of a knowledge of the plants rather than for the convenience of possessors of herbaria : also that the differences which we are able to describe as distinguishing plants b^ing taken from their more minute organs, does not invalidate their claim to distinction. It seems to be our business to decide upon the probable distinctness of plants before we attempt to define them to make the species afford the character, not the character define the species. PKEFACE. V This volume being intended as a field-book or travelling companion for botanists, it is advisable to restrict the space allotted to each species as much as possible ; and accordingly the characters and observations are only such as appear to be necessary for an accurate discrimination of the plants. Facts relating to their geographical distribution are there- fore usually omitted. Synonyms have been almost wholly omitted ; but the plates of the original English Botany or some other British plates are quoted. Syme's English Botany may well be used by those who desire full de- scriptions of the plants ; and the plates in that work have often had valuable additions made to those of the old Eng- lish Botany, from which most of them are taken. Localities are only given for new or rare plants ; Mr. Watson's works and the numerous local floras render it unnecessary incon- veniently to swell the present volume by their introduction. But in order to convey some idea of the distribution of plants throughout the United Kingdom, the letters E., S., or I. have been appended to the descriptions of such species as have, it is believed, been found in England, Scotland, or Ireland. The descriptions of a considerable number of plants which only occur in the Channel Islands, and are, therefore, not properly parts of the British Flora ; or which, although included in our lists, there is reason to suppose have never been really detected in Britain ; or, although naturalized, have very slender claims to be considered aboriginal natives; or which are now supposed to be lost by the alterations made in the places where they were found by our predecessors ; are included within [] ; and notices of a few plants concerning which more accurate information is requisite, are distinguished in a similar manner. It is hoped that by this arrangement the truly in- digenous species will be clearly distinguished from those which have little or no claim to be considered aboriginal Vi PREFACE. or even thoroughly naturalized. The attempt to do this is necessary for two seemingly contradictory reasons, namely : the great tendency of many collectors to consider native any plant found growing upon a spot where it is not cultivated ; and the peculiar scepticism of some of our "botanists concerning the claims of many local or thinly scattered species to be admitted as indigenous, even when their distribution upon the European continent is not un- favourable to the belief that they may inhabit Britain. It has been recommended that the descriptions of these ex- cluded species should be placed in an Appendix or even omitted ; but as some of them are not unlikely to be observed by collectors, it is more convenient that they should be arranged with their allies. Those who desire to obtain a complete knowledge of the distribution of our plants should consult Watson's Cybele Britannica, and Moore & More's Oybele Hibernica. Full characters of the Natural Orders are to be found in most of the best ' Introductions to Botany ' ; and it has therefore not been considered advisable to give them in detail in the present volume. In his definitions, the Author has endeavoured to point out the characteristic marks, more especially as far as British plants are concerned. In using this book the student will find it convenient to pay attention to the italicized parts of the generic and spe- cific characters, and, if they are found to agree with the plant under examination, then to compare it with the other parts of those characters, and also with those of allied genera and species. It is most desirable that the students of our native flora should not confine their attention to books published in this country. Owing to such an unavoidable restriction we fell far behind our continental brethren during the earlier part of the present century. A few modern works may be PREFACE. Vll named which will assist them in their studies. Koch's Synopsis filorce Germanicce, ed. 2, and Grenier and Godron's Flore de France are strongly recommended, also, although in a rather less degree, Lloyd's Flore de ? Quest de la France, Brebisson's Flore de la Normandie, and Cosson and Ger- main's Plore des environs de Paris, ed. 2. Boreau's Flore du Centre de la France, ed. 3, and the scattered papers of M. Alexis Jordan of Lyons are valuable for the study of varieties ; for many of their species can claim no higher rank. But, above all, the works of Fries deserve careful study especially his Novitice Florce Suecicw, with its three Mantissas, and Summa Vegetabilium Scandinavia?. It is necessary to warn students against the very common error of supposing that they have found one of the plants de- scribed in a foreign Flora when in reality they have only gathered a variety of some well-known British plant. The risk of falling into such errors renders it necessary to con- sult such works as those of Messrs. Borean and Jordan with great caution, lest we should be misled by descriptions, most accurate, indeed, hut often rather those of individuals than species. Amongst plants so closely allied as are many of those called species in some continental works, it is scarcely possible to arrive at a certain conclusion without the inspection of authentic specimens. The Author takes this opportunity of returning most sincere thanks to his botanical friends and correspondents (far too numerous to record by name) for the great assist- ance they have again rendered to him by the communica- tion of valuable suggestions, observations, and specimens. The book has been again carefully revised throughout, so as, if possible, to keep pace with the rapidly advancing knowledge of British plants. As many as possible of the real English names are given. All the genera and species could not be thus named, owing VI 11 PREFACE. to the absence of any recognized English terms which have been applied to them. It does not seem desirable to invent or adopt new English names, known only to botanists, for the few genera which have them not, the Latin name being sufficient in those cases, and better in the original than in