Illiilillili'' '"jjili" "'i''^ ll'ilpllllllllllii m LIBRARY OF THK University of California. Mrs. SARAH P. WALSWORTH. Received October, 1894. Accessions No.Si^^2i^. Class No. n^^/H^, ,0^3^mmi!(^j^ f # m. '^^^-^-^ / / / 05;m£sip :yxr_. rt4%^ ILLUSTRATIONS HOLY SCRIPTURES, DERIVED PRINCIPALLY FROM THE MANNERS, CUSTOMS, RITES, TRADITIONS, FORMS OF SPEECH ANTiaUITIES CLIMATE, AND WORKS OF ART AND LITERATURE, EASTERN NATIONS; EMBODYING ALL THAT IS VALUABLE IN THE WORKS OF HARMER, BURDER, PAXTON, AND ROBERTS, AND THE MOST CELEBRATED ORIENTAL TRAVELLERS ; ' EMBRAQNG ALSO THE SUBJECT OF THE FULFILMENT OF PROPHECY, AS EXHIBITED BY KEITH AND OTHERS ; WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PRESENT STATE OF COUNTRIES AND PLACES MENTIONED IN THE SACRED WRITINGS, ILLUSTRATED BY NUMEROUS LANDSCAPE ENGRAVINGS, FROM SKETCHES TAKEN ON THE SPOT. REV. GEORGE BUSH, jfV OF XH^ s PROFESSOR OP HEBREW AND ORIENTAL LITERATURE IN THE NEW YORK CITY rNTVERSITY. '' *« ** A it 13* PHILADELPHIA: ^ PUBLISHED BY J. B. LIPPINCOTT & CO. 1850. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1836, by JOHN C. HOLBROOK, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Vermont. STEREOTYPED BY FRANCIS F. RIPLEY, NEW YORK. Sl'^-^f i^ 4"^^ PREFACE. H^^nr^ Next in worth and importance to the possession, is doubtless to be estimated the correct interpretation of the sacred volume. Indeed, it is the latter which gives its value to the former. A revelation not understood, or not intelligible, is no revelation, as far as its recipients are concerned. The position, therefore, that the meaning of the Bible is the Bible, we consider as unquestionably true, and consequently any new accession of light, which goes to clear up its obscurities, and cause its genuine sense to stand forth in bolder relieY upon the inspired page, is in reality enriching us with a larger amount of its treasures, and virtually bestowing upon us added communications of the Divine will. In this view, the progressive elucidation of the scriptures, whether by the expository labours of critics, the researches of travellers, or the fulfilments of prophecy, may be compared to the gradual rolling away of the morning mist from a splendid landscape. As the sun advances, the shades retire, and new and interesting features of the scenery are continually opening upon tha delighted eye of the spectator. Or, it may be said to resemble the slow, but momentous process of unfolding the ancient papyri, which the ravages of time and fire have spared among the ruins of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Here, as every successive word and letter, which can be redeemed from the crisp and crumbling texture of the blackened parchment, is noted down with the most scrupulous care, as forming a part of the continuous record, and going to make out its entire sense ; so the sense of the sacred volume is gradually elicited, item by item, and needs only to be collected and treasured up with equal solicitude, in order to constitute a possession of infinitely more value than the choicest literary relics of antiquity. Perhaps it may be safely affirmed, that the materials are at this moment in existence, for the satisfactory solution of nearly every doubtful passage of holy writ ; but the great desideratum is to have them brought together — to collect them from their wide dispersion over a countless multitude of writings, in various languages, which the great majority of Christians can neither procure nor understand. It is only in this way that they can be made really available to the great end which they are calculated to subserve ; and far from idle are the claims of any one who professes to bring from scattered sources a new quota to the general stock of biblical illustration. As the Bible, in its structure, spirit, and costume, is essentially an Eastern book, it is obvious that the natural phenomena, and the moral condition of the East, should be made largely tributary to its elucidation. In order to appreciate fully the truth of its descriptions, and the accuracy, force, and beauty of its various allusions, it is indispensable that the reader, as far as possible, separate himself from his ordinary associations, and put himself, by a kind of mental transmi- gration, into the very circumstances of the writers. He must set himself down in the midst of oriental scenery — gaze upon the sun, sky, mountains, and rivers of Asia — go forth with the nomade tribes of the desert — follow their flocks — travel with their caravans — rest in their tents— lodge in their khans— load and unload their camels — drink at their watering-places — pause during the heat of the day under the shade of their palms — cultivate the fields with their own rude implements — gather in or glean after their harvests— beat out and ventilate the grain in their open thrashing-floors — dress in their costume— note their proverbial or idiomatic forms of speech, and listen to the strain of song or story, with which they beguile the vacant hours. In a word, he must surround himself with, and transfuse himself into, all the forms, habitudes, and usages of oriental life. In this way only can he catch the sources of their imagery, or enter into full communion with the genius of the sacred penmen. While, therefore, we readily concede the very high importance of critical and philological research in dissipating the obscurities of the scriptures, and fixing their exact sense, we cannot, at the same time, but think that the collatera* illustrations derived from this source, are deserving of at least equal attention from the student of revelation. The truth is, the providence of God, which is never more worthily employed than about his Word, seems now to be directing the eyes of his servants, as with pointed finger, to the immense stores of elucidation constantly accumulating from this quarter. The tide of travel within a few years, has turned remarkably to the East. Animated either by the noble spirit of missionary enterprise, of commercial speculation, of military adventure, or laudable curiosity, men of intelligence and observation have made their way into every region on which the light of revelation originally shone ; exploring its antiquities, mingling with its inhabitants, detailing its manners and customs, and displaying its physical, moral, and political circumstances. From these expeditions they have returned laden with the rich results of their industry, and the labours of the pen and the pencil have made thousands partakers of the benefit. Somewhat more than half a century ago, when the justly celebrated Observations of Harmer were given to the public, the range of materials to which he had access was comparatively limited. The travels of Chardin, Pococke, Shaw, Maundrell, Pitts, D'Arvieux, with Russel's Natural History of Aleppo, were his principal authorities— authorities, it is true, which have not yet been wholly superseded. But since his time, what an immense accession has the department of oriental travels received' The names of Volney, Niebuhr, Mariti, Clarke, Chateaubriand, Porter, Burckhardt, Buckingham, Morier, Seetzen, De Lamartine, Laborde, exhaust but a small part of the list of eastern tourists, whose labours have gone to make us familiarly acquainted with the land of patriarchs, prophets, and apostles. How desirable that the scattered gleams of illustrative light, which shine in th^ir works, should be concentrated into one focus of illumination ! This is the task which we have essayed in the present volume. 6 PREFACE. In entering upm and advancing in this task, we have been more and more impressed with the remarkal.le fact of the permanence of eastern usages. True to the traditions of their ancestors, and impenetrable thus far to the spirit of innovation, their manners and customs, opinions and institutions, retain all the fixedness of their mountains, and flow on as unvarying as the course of their streams. To the question, therefore, whether the state of things in the East, as described by modern travellers, really coincides with that which existed at the time the scriptures were written, so that one may be cited as conveying a correct idea of the other ;• we may reply, in the words of Sir John Chardin, one of the most respectable and authentic of the number:—" I have written nothing," says he, " of the Indies, because I lived but five years there, and understood only fhe vulgar languages, which are the Indian and Persian, without the knowledge of that of the Brahmins; but, nevertheless, I did not spend my time there in idleness : on the contrary, as the winters in tljat country will not permit one to travel, I employed, that time in a work which I had long in my thoughts, and which I may call my favourite design, by the pleasure wherewith I laboured in it, and the profit which I hope the public will receive thereby; which is certain notes upon very many passages of holy scripture, whereof the explication depends on the knowledge of the customs of the eastern countries ; for the East is the scene of all the historical facts mentioned in the Bible. The language of that divine book (especially of the Old Testament) being oriental, and very often figurative and hyperbolical, those parts of scripture which are written in verse, and in the prophecies, are full of figures and hyperboles, which, as it is manifest, cannot be well understood without a knowledge of things from whence such figures are taken, which are natural properties and particular manners of the countries to which they refer. I discerned this in my first voyage to the Indies: for I gradually found a greater sense and beauty in divers passages of scripture than I had before, by having in my view the things, either natural or moral, which explained them to me ; ana in perusing the different translations which the greatest part of the translators of the Bible had made, I observed that every one of them (to render the expositions, as they thought, more intelligible) used such expressions as would accommodate the phrase to the places where they writ ; and which did not only many times pervert the text, but often rendered the sense obscure, and sometimes absurd also. In fine, consulting the commentators upon such kind of passages, I found very strangp mistakes in them, and that they had long guessed at the sense, and did but grope (as in the dark) in search of it. And from these reflections I took a resolution to make my remarks upon many passages of the scriptures ; persuading myself that they would be equally agreeable and profitable for use. And the learned, to whom I communicated my design, encouraged me very much, by their commendations, to proceed in it ; and more especially when I informed them, that it is not in Asia, as in our Europe, where there are frequent changes, more or less, in the form of things, as the habits, buildings, gardens, and the like. In the East they are constant in all things ; the habits are at this day in the same manner as in the precedent ages ; so that one may reasonably believe, that in that part of the world, the exterior form of things (as their manners and customs) are the same now as they were two thousand years since, except in such changes as have been introduced by religion, which are, nevertheless, veryinconsiderable."^Prefaceto Travels in Persia, p. 6.) Morier, an eastern traveller, says, " The manaers of the East, amid all the changes of government and religion, are stil„ the same; they are living impressions from an original mould; and at every step, some object, some idiom, some dress, or some custom of common life, reminds the traveller of ancient times, and confirms, above all, the beauty, the accuracy^ and the propriety of the language and the history of the Bible." This very striking testimony to the conformity, or rather identity, of the modern with the ancient usages of the East, is abundantly confirmed from other sources, as scarcely a traveller has set foot upon oriental soil, without professing himself to be at once struck with the remarkable coincidence between the picture of ancient manners, as drawn in the sacred writings, and the state of things which actually meets his eye. This steadfast resistance to the spirit of innovation and change, which thus remarkably distinguishes the nations of the East, will probably, in the providence of God, remain unsubdued, till it shall have answered all the important purposes of biblical elucidation, when it will give way to the all-pervading, all-regenerating influence of the Bible itself, borne upon the bosom of a new tide of civilization and improvement, which shall, ere long, set in upon the East from the nations of Europe, and the great continent of the West. " By a wonderful provision of Providence," says De Lamartine, " who never creates wants without at the same time creating the means of satisfying them, it happens, that at the moment when the great crisis of civilization takes place in Europe, and when the new necessities resulting from it are revealing themselves, both to governments and people, a great crisis of an inverse order takes place in the East, and a vast void is there off"ered for the redundancy of European population and faculties. The excess of life which is overflowing here, may and must find an outlet in that part of the world ; the excess of force which overstrains us, may and must find employment in those countries, where the human powers are in a state of exhaustion and torpidtty, where the stream of population is stagnant or drying up, where the vitality of the human race is expiring." In the mean time, while the inevitable doom of revolution and transformation that awaits the East, lingers, it behooves us to make the most, for useful purposes, of that state of society which still exists, but which, ere long, will have passed away. With this view, we have endeavoured to imbody in the present volume a large mass of oriental illustration. The work is strictly of an eclectic character. Postponing the claims of originality to those of practical utility, the Editor, after arraying before him the amplest store of materials which he could command, set himself to the task of selecting and arranging the most valuable portions which he could bring within the limits of his plan. The kindred works of Harmer, Burder, Paxton, Taylor's edition of Calmet, scarcely any of which are in common accessible to the majority of biblical students, have been diligently gleaned, and all their important contents transferred to our pages. As these works are not likely ever to be reprinted in this country, there appeared no other way to arrest their progress lO oblivion, and to secure a larger and wider circulation to the valuable matter which they contain. But the range of selection has been by no means confined to the works now mentioned. So prolific has been the press within the last twenty or thirty years, of books of eastern travels, illustrative of manners, customs, and religion, that our resources in this department have been almost indefinitely multiplied. But to one work in particular— Roberts' Oriental PREFACE. "J Illustrations of the Sacred Scriptures, collected during a residence of nearly fourteen years among the Hindoos— the Editor desires, as an act of justice, to which he is sure the reader will most heartily respond, to express his very deep obligations. He considers himself peculiarly fortunate in meeting with this work just as he was entering upon his own undertaking, so that he has been able to incorporate it nearly entire in the present volume. Though abounding chiefly in illustrations drawn from the parabolical, idiomatical, and proverbial phraseolgy common in the East, yet his notes are so pointed and pertinent in their scope, so felicitous and graphic in their turn of expression, and so remarkable for the vividness with which the leading idea is exhibited, that we doubt not the reader will find in this part alone an ample equivalent for the cost of the whole volume. The Rev. T. H. Home says he feels himself "justified in recommending Mr. Roberts' ' Illustrations,' as supplying an important desideratum in biblical literature. They furnish to very many difficult or obscure passages satisfactory explanations, which are not more original than they are entertaining and instructive." " Mr. Roberts' work," says the British Critic, "is replete with interesting matter, and, in a condensed form, contains more illustrations of Holy Writ than any other book we know of. He richly deserves our thanks, and the thanks especially of those who are not able to possess many volumes illustrative of the oriental rites and customs to be found in the Bible. We have only to add, that this volume is worth all the twopenny trash which the last half dozen years have given birth to." As the present work is designed to be marked by somewhat of the same Comprehensive character which distinguishes the other biblical works lately issued from the press of the Publishers, the illustrations bear upon numerous other points than those relating to manners and customs. Every thing of a purely doctrinal character, about which the different denominations of Christians might be supposed to disagree, has been studiously excluded; at least such has been the Editor's intention, and if any thing should be met with that seems to gainsay this declaration, he begs it maybe set down to the account of a momentary inadvertence, rather than of a determinate purpose. But with this exception, he has given himself as much latitude in the selection of matter, as was consistent with a prevailing unity of design in the structure of the whole. The subject of the Fulfilment of Prophecy, cannot well be lost sight of by any one conversant at once with the scriptures and the reports of modern travellers. The topographical descriptions of many of the most noted places of scripture, a department to which particular attention has been given in the ensuing pages, suggests at once the divine predictions bearing upon their future doom. The researches of tourists, both skeptics and Christians, have poured a flood of light upon this subject. It is perfectly astonishing, to one who has never examined the subject, to find how literally and minutely the prophetic declarations of scripture have been fulfilled, so that even infidel travellers and historians, as Volney and Gibbon, in their accounts of nations and countries, have unwittingly used for description, almost the words of scripture in which the events are foretold. Volney, particularly, (one of the bitterest opposers of Christianity,) in his published travels in the East, has atforded, unwillingly and unthinkingly, a wonderful attestation to the truth of the Bible, in the relation of facts which came under his own eye. There needs no better witness. Indeed, it is impossible for the most determined infidel carefully to examine and weigh this subject, and not be forced to feel that the Bible is divine ; or, in the words of Bishop Newton, " he is reduced to the necessity, either to renounce his senses, deny what he reads in the Bible, and what he sees and observes in the world, or acknowledge the truth of prophecy, and consequently, of divine revelation." The researches of travellers in Palestine have been abundant, and the prophecies thereby verified are numerous and distinct, so that the facts may be related literally in the language of the prophecy. To use the words of a late writer in the London Gtuarterly Review, " we confess that we have felt more surprise, delight, and conviction, in examining the accounts which the travels of Burckhardt, Mangles, Irby, Leigh, and Laborde, have so recently given of Judea, Edom, &c. than we have ever derived from any similar inquiry. It seems like a miracle in our own times. Twenty years ago we read certain portions of th.e prophetic scriptures, with a belief that they were true, because other similar passages had, in the course of ages, been proved to be so, and we had an indistinct notion, that all these (to us) obscure and indefinite denunciations iiad been — we knew not very well when or how — accomplished : but to have graphic descriptions, ground plans, and elevations, showing the actual existence of all the heretofore vague and shadowy denunciations of God against Edom, does, we confess, excite our feelings, and exalt our confidence in prophecy, to a height that no external evidence has hitherto done Here we have — ^bursting upon our age of incredulity, by the labours of accidental, impartial, and sometimes incredulous" (infidel) " witnesses— the certainty of existing facts, which fulfil what were considered hitherto the most vague and least intelligible of the prophecies. The value of one such contemporaneous proof is immense." Indeed, it would seem that in regard to such places as Babylon, Nineveh, Tyre, Moab, Edom, and others, the providence of God was no less conspicuous in bringing to light, in these latter ages, the evidence of the accomplishment of those prophecies, than formerly in working the accomplishment itself. The valuable labours of Keith in this depart- ment, arranged in accordance with our general plan, so as to exhibit the commentary under its appropriate text, will be found to have added much to the interest and profit of the reader in perusing our pages. The numerous highly finished engravings, executed by distinguished artists, from sketches taken on the spot, and accompanied, for the most part, with letter-press descriptions by the Rev. T. H, Home, originally published in Finden's Landscape Illustrations, will go also greatly to enhance the value of this portion of the illustrations. A critical note is occasionally thrown in, where the point of a passage seemed capable of a happy explication, especially from a more exact analysis of the import of the original terms. Those bearing the signature of the Editor will perhaps usually be found of this character, and for any seeming infraction in this of his general plan, he solicits the indulgence not unreasonably claimed for a favourite mode of scripture exposition. They are, however, for the most part, " few and far between." As a prominent object aimed at throughout has been, not only to increase the facilities for a complete understanding of the inspired volume, but also to multiply the evidences, and vindicate the claims of its divine original, a portion of our pages has been allotted to the direct consideration of infidel objections and cavils. The most important extracts of this 8 PREFACE. description have been taken from the valuable and now rare " Life of David," by Chandler, in which the insinuations of Bayle against the character of David, are canvassed and refuted with distinguished ability, though perhaps somewhat more verbosely than is consistent with the taste either of modern writers or readers. The original and acute remarks of Michaelis, on many points of the Mosaic laws and ritual, though sometimes bordering upon the fanciful, disclose a profound acquaintance with the genius of the East, and are generally entitled to deep attention. As the authorities employed in the preparation of the ensuing pages are usually quoted in a very general way — for *he most part merely by citing the writer's name — it will probably be rendering an important service to many of our readers, to give a more ample view of the sources upon which we have drawn for materials. The list is by no means complete, nor, as many have served us at second hand, is it perhaps practicable or necessary that it should bej but the most important and valuable will be found here grouped together, and ordinarily, by turning to this catalogue, the entire title, including edition and date, of any work cited in the ensuing pages simply by the author's name, will be found. Such a catalogue may be of service for other purposes than those connected with the present volume. Harmer's Observations on Various Passages of Scripture, with ad- ditions by Adam Clarke, LL. £>., 4 vols. 8vo. Charlestown, 1811. Paxton's Illustrations, 3 vols. 8vo. Edinburgh, 1^. Burder's Oriental Customs, 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1816. " Oriental Literature, with Rosenmuller's Additions, 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1822. Roberts' Oriental Illustrations, 8vo. London, 1835. Calmet's Dictionary, Taylor's Edition, 5 vols. 4to. London, 1829. Shavf's Travels through Barbary and the Levant, folio. Lon. 1738. MAVSi>REL,h's Journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem, 8vo. Oxford, 1749. Volney's Travels through Egypt and Syria, 8\o. New York, 1798. Mariti's Travels through Cyprus, Syria, and Palestine, 2 vols. 8vo. Dublin, 1793. Baron De Tott's Memoirs on the Turks and Tartars, 3 vols. 12mo. Dublin, 1785. RrssELL's Natural history of Aleppo, 2 vols. 4to. London, 1794. Clarke's Travels in the Holy Land, 12mo. Philadelphia, 1817. Tournefort's Voyage to the Levant, 3 vols. 8vo. London, 1741. Buckingham's Travels in Mesopotamia, 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1827. " Travels among the Arab Tribes, 4to. London, 1825. Bcrckhardt's Travels in Arabia, 4to. London, 1829. " Travels in Nubia and Egypt, ito. London, 1822. Madden's Travels in Turkey, Egypt, and Palestine, 2 vols. 12mo. Pliiladelphia, 1830, Madox's Excursions in the Holy Land, Egypt, Nubia, Syria, ^c, 2vols. 8vo. London, 1834. Callaway's Oriental Observations, 12mo. London, 1825. Campbell's African Light, 12mo. London, 1835. Anderson's Tour through Greece, 12mo. Boston, 1831. Hardy's Notices of the Holy Land, 12mo. London, 1835. Chateaubriand's Travels, 8vo. New York, 1814. Keppel's Narrative of a Journey from India to England, 8vo. Philadelphia, 1827. Morier's Journey through Persia, 8vo. Philadelphia, 1816. Smith and Dwiqht's Researches in Armenia, 2 vols. 12mo. Boston, 1833. Jowett's Christian Researches in Syria and the Holy Land, 8vo. London, 1825. Modern Traveller, Palestine, Syria, and Asia Minor, 3 vols. 12mo. Boston, 1830. Heeren's Asiatic Nations, 3 vols. 8vo. Oxford, 1833. Waddington's Travels in Ethiopia, 4to. London, 1^7. HosKiNs' Travels in Ethiopia, 4to. London, 1835. Bdrnes's Travels in Bokhara, 2 vols. 12mo. Philadelphia, 1835. Munroe's Summer Ramble in Syria, 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1835. Hogg's Visit to Alexandria, Damascus, and Jerusalem, 2 vols. \2xBa. London, 1835. Wilkinson's TViebes, and General View of Egypt, 8vo. London, 1835. ARfTNDELL's Dtscovcries in Asia Minor, 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1834. De Lamartine's Pilgrimage to the Holy Land, 2 vols. 12mo. Phila- delphia, 1835. Stackhouse's History of the Bible, 2 vols, folio. Londcn, 1755. Chandler's Life of David, 2 vols. 8vo. London, 1766. Michaelis's Commentaries on the Laws of Moses, 4 vols. 8vo. Lon- don, 1814. Gleig's History of the Bible, 3 vols. 12mo. New York, 1831. Horsley's Sermons, 8vo. London, 1830. Pococke's Theological Works, 2 vols, folio. London, 1740. Newcome's Minor Prophets, 8vo. Pontefract, 1809. Keith's Evidence of Prophecy, 12mo. New York, 1833. Good's Translation of Job, 8vo. London, 1812. Finden's Landscape Illustrations. London, 1835. The importance of the present work must be obvious, and being altogether illustrative, without reference to doctrineSj or other points in which Christians differ, it is hoped it will meet with favour from all who love the sacred volume, and that it will be sufficiently interesting and attractive to recommend itself, not only to professed Christians of all denomina- tions, but also to the general reader. The arrangement of the texts illustrated with the notes, in the order of the chapters and verses of the authorized version of the Bible, will render it convenient for reference to particular passages, while the copious Index at the end, will at once enable the reader to turn to every subject discussed in the volume. It only remains for the Editor to remark, that he would by no means be held responsible for the truth or justice of every sentiment advanced by way of interpretation or illustration in the present work. He hopes not to be considered as adopting himself all the various explications of scripture which he has yet felt it his duty to propound. Many of them are proposed by their authors themselves merely as conjectures, and though he may occasionally have entertainec doubts of their correctness, yet, as they involved only points of minor importance, he has seldom felt himself called upon to turn aside to question or confute them. A very large mass of obviously true or highly probable illustration, is here presented to the reader. As to the pertinency or verisimilitude of particular portions, he will of course exercise a due discrimination ; he cannot be expected to forego his own judgment, nor will he find it necessary to presume upon that of him who has thus endeavoured, however feebly, to minister, by so great a variety of provision, to his instruction and pleasure. , Q. B. Nem Yorkf May 1st, 1836. ILLUSTRATIONS HOLY SCRIPTURES. GENESIS dliH Chap. 1. Ver. 1. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Notwithstanding the industrious attempts of many skep- tical writers to array the evidence deducible from geolo- gical discoveries against the Mosaic account of the cre- ation, nothing has yet been advanced to invalidate the testimony of the inspired record, as nothing has yet been brought to show that its statements, when rightly under- stood, are at all at variance with any of the clear and un- doubted results of scientific research. We say, when rightly understood ; for that the conclusions of the geolo- gist, even the most legitimate and demonstrable, may be inconsistent with the fo'pular interpretation of the sacred narrative, we by no means deny ; but it is obvious that such interpretation may be erroneous, and thart all that is requisite to bring the two departments into perfect har- mony, may be the fixing of the genuine sense of the writer by a purely philological process. Until, therefore, it is es- tablished beyond controversy that the language of Moses cannot, by any possibility of fair construction, be made to tally with, or at least not to contradict, the admitted truths of geological science, it is vain to charge revelation with uttering oracles at variance with the irrefragable teach- ings of nature. But this, it is to be remembered, never has been, and we are confident never will be, done. The material fabric of the universe and the book of inspira- tion are the works of the same author, and we may be sure that the truths pertaining to the one cannot be at war with those belonging to the other. The following remarks of the Rev. Bartholomew Lloyd, Provost of Trinity Col- lege, Dublin, on the drift of the sacred penman in the first chapter of Genesis, cannot but commend themselves to every enlightened reader : " The sacred writer pre- faces his history of God's government over his chosen people, by informing us, that ' in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth,' and it seems equallv certain that he here speaks of the original creation of all things out of nothing. This, indeed, is a great subject, and though nothing circumstantial is here revealed to us concerning it, yet the sacred importance of the truth, assured to us by this simple expression, is every way suitable to the prom- inent place assigned to it ; for it is nothing less than the authoritative statement of the first and fundamental article of all true religious faith. By it we are taught that self- existence is an attribute of the one supreme Being, and that all things besides owe their existence to His unlimited power. How necessary it was to mankind to have an, authoritative declaration on this subject, we may readily convince ourselves by adverting to the errors into which the most celebrated men of all antiquity had fallen, who presumed to speculate on these matters, so far beyond the reach of human reason, without other guidances. Among these erroneous opinions, or rather among those wild con- jectures, we find the following :— that matter was eternal; that the Deity was the soul of the world; agreeably to which, the material frame of nature was to be regarded as his body, and not as his work. Now, in this his first sentence, the inspired writer settles definitively what we are to believe on this subject, by stating the primary rela- tion which all things in common bear to the supreme Be- ing ; and with this information he forbears from mixing up any other matter. For it will be perceived that the state- ment is made without any specification of time or other cir- cumstance ; seemingly, because no addition of this kind could be of use in aiding our conceptions of a truth purely religious, or in strengthening our faith in the authority on which it was proposed ; but chiefly because it was the sole object of the writer, in this first sentence, to (^.aim for God the creation of all things whatsoever, and that this claim must remain unshaken, however we may decide on other questions which may be raised about the creation ; such as that relative to the time when it occurred ; how long before the origin of the human race ; whether all the parts of the universe were brought into existence simultaneous- Iv, or at different and widely distant epochs. It is plain, then, that in this place the sacred writer furnishes no helps for the decision of such questions. Let us look to what follows. In proceeding to those arrangements by which the earth was to be fitted for the residence and support of man, and the other inferior tribes by which it was then to be tenanted, we find him describing its preceding condi- tion ; informing us that it was then ' without form and void,' and that ' darkness was upon the face of the deep.' Now, I confess that this always seemed to me very like the description of a ruined world : and if such was the earth at that time, it would be difficult to suppose that it had not existed long before. But this is not all. When he does come to tlje work of the six days, we find the de- scription of each day's work introduced by an expression of a particular form, and concluded by another, by which it appears that the original work of creation, spoken ol in the first verse, is excluded from the series of perform- ances belonging to those days; — and, if excluded, theri, perhaps, removed to an indefinite distance; for had it immediately preceded, we might naturally expect to find it spoken of, either as the work of the first of a series ol seven days, or as part of the work of the first of the six days. This, then, would seem to remove the work of the original creation far beyond that of the reconstruction ol the globe. It is true, that nothing is exhibited to our ima- ginations to mark the interval between these perform- ances ; but to deny that there was such an interval, and for that reason, would be to conclude about as wisely as the peasant, who supposes the clouds to be contiguous to the stars, because when looking up he discerns nothing between them." Dr. Chalmers, in his treatise on the Evidences of Chris- tianity, speaks to the same effect. " Does Moses ever say, that when God created the heavens and the earth, he did more, at the time alluded to, than transform them out of previously existing materials? Or does he ever say, that there was not an interval of many ages between the first act of creation, described in the first verse of the book of Gen- esis, and said to have been performed in the beginning, and those more detailed operations, the account of which commences at the second verse, and which are described to us as having been performed in so many days % Or, finally, does he ever make us understand, that the gener- ations of man went further than to fix the antiquity of th« 10 GENESIS. Chap. 1. species, and of consequence that they left the antiquity of the globe a free subject for the speculations of philoso- phers 1" " We do not know," says Sharon Turner, " and we have no means of knowing, at what point of the ever-llowing eternity of that which is alone eternal— the Divine subsist- ence — the creation of our earth, or of any part of the uni- verse began, nor in what section of it we are living now. All that we can learn explicitly from revelation is, that nearly 6000 years have passed since our first parent began to be. Our chronology, that of Scripture, is dated from the period of his creation ; and almost 6000 years have elapsed since he moved and breathed a full-formed man. But what series of time had preceded his formation, or in what portion of the anteceding succession of time this was effect- ed, has not been disclosed, ajid cannot by any effort of hu- man ingenuity be now explored. — Creation must have be- gun at some early part of anteceding eternity; and our earth may have had its commencement in such a primeval era, as well as in a later one." Professor Hitchcock, in an elaborate and very able essay on the connexion between Geology and the Mosaic History, (Biblic. Reposit. Oct. 1835,) undertakes to establi:-h, and we tliink with entire success, the following positions, which we give in his own words: — " In the first place, we main- tain that between geology and revelation there are several unexpected and remarkable coincidences, such as could have resulted (jnly from veracity on the part of the sacred historian; and that the points of agreement are far more numerous than the points of apparent collision; and, there- fore, even geology alone famishes a strong presumptive evidence in favour of the truth of the Mosaic history. We maintain, secondly, that the first chapter of Genesis is a por- tion of Scripture that has always occasioned much difficulty in its interpretation, apart from geology, and that those por- tions of it about which commentators have differed most, are the very ones with which geology is supposed to come into collision ; so that in fact scarcely any new interpreta- tion has been proposed to meet the geological ditficulty. We admit, thirdly, that the geological dilficulty is real ; that is, the established facts of geology do teach us that the earth has existed through a vastly longer period, anterior to the creation of man, than the common interpretation of Genesis allows. We maintain, fourthly, that most of the methods that have been proposed to avoid or reconcile the geological difficulty are entirely inadequate, and irrecon- cilably at variance either with geology or revelation. We maintain, fifthly, that at least one or two of these proposed modes of reconciling geology and Scripture, although not free from objections, are yet so probable, that without any auxiliary considerations, they would be sufficient, in the view of every reasonable man, to vindicate the Mosaic history from the charge of collision with the principles of geology. And finally, we maintain, that though all these modes of reconciliation should be unsatisfactory, it would be premature and unreasonable to infer that there exists any real discrepance : first, because we are by no means certain that we fully understand every part of the Mosaic account of the creation ; secondly, because geology is so recent a science, and is making so rapid advances, that we may expect from its future discoveries that some more light will be thrown upon cosmogony: and thirdly, be- cause, as geology has been more and more thoroughly un- derstood, the apparent discrepances between it and reve- lation have become less numerous." — B. Ver. 9. And God said. Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear : and it was so. We have before remarked, that, during the first and sec- ond days of the creation, the earth must have presented :o the view, (had any human eye existed to look upon it,) a solid globe of spheroidal form, covered with a thin coat of aqueous fluid, and already revolving on its axis as a mem- ber of the solar system. We are fully authorized in coming to this latter conclusion, from the distinct mention made in the record, of the days, comprising, like our present days, the evening and the morning, with the darkness and the light following each other in regular succession. The sun, it is true, had not yet been made visibly to appear, or to shine through the, as yet, cloudy atmosphere. It was now the will of the Creator that the earth should no longer be ^Hnvisible" under its watery covering; and, according- ly, the command was given, that " the waters should be gathered together unto one place," that the " dry land" might appear. In considering this great event, it becomes a natural and fair question, as it has been left open to us by the record, as to the mode or means by which it must have taken place. The well-poised earth had already be- gun to revolve upon its axis ; and the laws of gravitation and of fluids had consequently begun to act in our system. By these laws, it was impossible that the waters could have been gathered together by accumulation, or above the gen eral level, as the solids of the earth might have been. We can, therefore, come to no other conclusion than that to which we are also led by various parts of the inspired wri- tings, viz. that God did " rend the depths by his intelli- gence," and formed a depression, or hollow, on a part of the solid globe, within which, by the appointed laws of fluids, the "depths" were "gathered together." The fol- lowing beautiful reflections on this part of our subject are from the enlightened mind of Mr. Granville Penn, who may, indeed, be called the first great advocate for the Mosaic Geology, among the men of science of our day. " The briefness of this clatfse, (Genesis i. 9,) and the nature of the subject, have caused it to be little contemplated in proportion to its importance, and to the fulness of the in- struction which it conveys ; and, therefore, it has not been observed that the same sublimity which is universally per- ceived in the clause, ' Let there be light, and there was light,' subsists equally in this clause ; ' Let the waters be gathered together unto one place, and let the Axy land be seen, and it was so.' The sentiment of sublimity in the former clause, results from the contemplation of an instantaneous transition of the universe from the profoundest darkness to the most splendid light, at the command of God. All men familiarly apprehend the sadness of the former, and the delight of the latter ; and they are, therefore, instantly sensible of the glorious nature of the change which was then so suddenly produced. But the nature of the change which must necessarily have taken place, in suddenly rendering visible a part of a solid globe, the universal surface of which had been, overflowed and concealed by a flood of waters, is not so familiarly or ^o instantly apprehended ; the mind, therefore, does not care to dwell upon it, but is contented with receiving the general information that the sea was formed. Hence, both commentators and geologists have equally failed to draw the immediate and necessary inference from the revelation of that great and undeniable geological fact.''^ — Fairholme's Geology, p. 51 — 54. Ver. 14. And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven, to divide the day from the night ; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years : 15* And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heav- en, to give light upon the earth : and it was so. 16. And God made two great lights ; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. 17. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven, to give light upon the earth. It is admitted that the Scriptures generally describe the phenomena of the natural world as they appear, rather than according to strict scientific truth. Thus the sun and moon are said to rise and set, — the stars to fall, — and the moon to be turned into blood. Consequently, if this history of the creation were designed to describe the effects of the six days' work as they would have appeared to a spectator, had one been present, — a supposition rendered probable from its being said, " Let the dry land appear," (Heb. be seen,) when as yet there was no eye to see it, — then we may reasonably conclude that the sun was formed on the first day, or per- haps had been created even before our earth, and w^as in fact the cause of the vicissitudes of the three first days and nights. But as the globe of the earth was during that time surrounded by a dense mass of mingled air and water, the rays of the sun would be intercepted ; only a dim glimmer- ing l|ght, even in the daytime, would appear; and the bodies of the heavenly luminaries would be entirely hidden, Chap. 2. GENESIS, 11 just as they now are in a very cloudy day. Let it be sup- posed then that on the fourth day the clouds, mists, and va- pours were all cleared away, and the atmosphere made pure and serene ; the sun of course would shine forth in all his splendour, and to the eye of our imagined spectator would seem to have been just created ; and so at night of the moon and stars. This effect of the Divine power, ac- cording to the USU3J analogy of the Scriptures, is descri- bed from its appearance, and the language employed,— " let there be lights in the firmament,"— and— " he made tWo great lights, and set them in the firmament" — is to be inter- preted on the principle above stated. They might then be said to be " made," because they then first began to be visi- ble, and to perform the office for which they were designed. The original word for " made" is not the same as that which is rendered " create." It is a term frequently employed to signify constituted, appointed, set for a particular purpose or use. Thus it is said that God " made Joseph a father to Pharaoh" — " made him lord of Egypt" — " made the Jordan a border between the tribes" — " made David the head of the heathen ;" and so in innumerable other instances. As, there- fore, the rainbow was made or constituted a sign, though it might have existed before, so the sun, moon, and stars may be said to have been made and set as lights in the firma- ment, on the fourth day, though actually called into exist- ence on the first, or previously. — Bush. Chap. 2. ver. 18. And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone ; I will make him a help-meet for him. This is the polite way of speaking of a wife in the East, though it must be confessed that they associate with this term too much of the idea of a servant. Does an aged person advise a young friend to get married ; he will not say, " Seek for a wife," but " Try to procure a thunive, a help-meet." A man who repines at his single state, says, " I have not any female help in my house." A widower says, " Ah ! my children, I have now no female help." A man, wishing to say something to his wife, will address her as follows: " My help-meet, hear what I am going to say." It is worthy of observation, that the margin has for help-meet, " as before him ;" and this gives a proper view of her condition, for she literally has to stand before her husband to serve him on all occasions, and especially when he takes his food ; she being then his servant. Say to a woman, " Leave thy husband!" she will reply, "No, no; I will stand before him." — Roberts. Ver. 19. And whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. The verb was is not in the original text ; and, therefore, the sentence may run in the present, with equal propriety as in the past; and, indeed, according to the genius of the language, with more propriety in the present — ^that is the name thereof. Hence the names by which the lower ani- mals were known in the days of Moses, were those which Adam gave them in Paradise ; and as these are pure He- brew, the legitimate conclusion is, that Hebrew was the language spoken by Adam before the fall. This argument receives an accession of strength from the ideal character of the Hebrew language. It is admit- ted, that all languages participate more or less of the ideal character ; but it is one of the most remarkable circumstan- ces by which the Hebrew is distinguished. A number of its words, as in other languages, are mere arbitrary signs of ideas; but, in general, they derive their origin from a very few terms, or roots, that are commonly expressive of some idea borrowed from external objects ; from the hu- man constitution ; from our senses or our feelings. The names of men, and of the lower animals, and the names of many places, particularly in the remoter ages, allude to some remarkable character in the creature named ; or, in reference to place, to some uncommon circumstance or event. Scarcely a proper name can be mentioned, which alludes not to something of this kind. To give a few ex- amples : Kore, the partridge, received its name from the verb Kara, to call, in imitation of the note which that bird uses in calling its young. The camel is in Hebrew, Gamal, from a verb of the same form, which signifies to recom- pense, because that creature is remarkable for remember- ing and revengmg an injur) . The Hebrews call the scor- pion Akrab, from two woi ds which signify to kill one's father ; now, both Pliny and Aristotle inform us, that it is the character of that creature to destroy its own parents. — Paxton. Ver. 20. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field: but for Adam there was not found a help-meet for him. With respect to the original language which Moses de- scribes our first parents as making use of, from their very first creation, we are nowhere informed in what manner they first acquired it, nor how it was communicated to them. It is, indeed, probable that the inspired historian addressed himself to those who were much less skeptical on such subjects than ourselves ; and that this remarkable endowment, peculiar to the human race, and by which they so far excel all other created beings, was never, in early times, doubted as having been directly communicated from the same wise and provident source from whence the hu- man race itself had arisen ; and the researches of the wisest and most learned men of all ages have invariably led them to the same natural conclusion. We have no direct means of positive knowledge as to what relation the primitive language of the earth may have had with existing tongues; but, in the absence of such evidence, we may form some conjectures on the subject, which are certainly marked with the highest probability. In the first place, we must consider that the numbers of the antediluvian human race, and their consequent divisions into nations, could not have been nearly so great as in the present day, from the comparatively short period they had existed, and from the comparatively unrefined condition natural to a primitive race of beings, on whom the gift of reason was obviously bestowed by the Creator for the pur- poses of exertion, and of gradual cultivation and improve- ment. We must not here suppose, however, with too many advocates of an erring philosophy, that man was, at first, Laturally savage, or in the state we now find the wild and uncultivated natives of savage countries; or that religion and knowledge were, in the first days, in the debased con- dition we now too often find them in the remote corners of the earth. The savage state is not natural to man; but, on the con- trary, is brought on by erring from the true path of know- ledge, in which both Adam and Noah must have brought up their first descendants ; and which, in both instances, was communicated in a direct manner, from the unerring source of every good which mankind now enjoys. In considering the progressive stages of society, we are too apt to content ourselves with merely looking back, from our own times, into the darker ages of barbarism, and thus to form our ideas on the false supposition, that the primitive nature of man is one of perfect ignorance, and such as we now find among the savages of Africa or America: whereas, if we trace the progress of society, in its proper and natural course, by descending from the creation, and from the deluge, instead of ascending from our own times, we shall find that the primitive state of mankind, even immediately after the creation, was one of intelligence and understanding, if not in arts and sciences, at least on the leading point of religion, which is, of all others, that in which the savage falls most short of the civilized man. It pleased his Creator to bestow upon primitive man a full and perfect conception of the relation in which he stood towards the Supreme Being; and it was in order to preserve a knowledge of the true religion among men, that a certain family arid race were afterward expressly chosen ; we find, accordingly, that to whatever state of idolatrous ignorance, or savage barbari- ty, the various ancient nations of the earth were, from time to time, reduced, there was always some portion of the world, and especially of the Jewish race, which adhered to the true faith, and which was, consequently, preserved from that state of unnatural debasement from which man has a constant tendency and desire to emancipate himself. It is, therefore, highly probable that, as we hear of no diversity of language on the earth until after the deluge, the whole primitive race was " of one language, and of one speech," and that that language must, consequently, have been the 12 GENESIS. Chap. 4. same spoken by those few individuals who were preserved from the flood. Now, when we consider the great scheme of the Almighty, foretold from time to time, from the days of Adam to those of Abraham, and continued from thence, in a well- defined course of history, to our own times ; when we con- sider the wonderful and miraculous events that were fore- told, and were afterward so \iteial\y fulfilled, in the line of the chosen people of God; — that, through them, and through their language, the Inspired Writings of the early times were to be for ever 'handed down to the generations of men ; that, of all the languages of the earth, the Hebrew tongue, like the Hebrew people, has hitherto withstood every change and every calamity ; and been, like them, miraculously preserved by the Almighty will for a great and beneficent end; and when we further consider the strong analogy and filiation, so easily traced, in all the languages of the earth, to the Hebrew, as the most probable 2>ostdiluvian original tongue; — when all these considera- tions are combined, is it unreasonable to conclude to the high probability of the original language of the Sacred Scriptures being the pure and original tongue first commu- nicated to man by his Maker % In considering, then, the language of the Hebrews as the most probable source from whence all other tongues have been derived ; and when we trace in all these other tongues the gradual varieties that have arisen, and are still now proceeding in the dialects of the earth, by the secondary causes, and, seemingly, trivial accidents, by which the different shades of language are brought about, are we not justified in drawing a compari- son betweeen the miraculously preserved primitive lan- guage, and the no less miraculously preserved chosen people, who are the constant living miracle, bearing unwill- ing witness to the truth of Inspiration, to all the generations of mankind 1 We are reminded, that it was repeatedly foretold in prophecy, that the Hebrew nation should be dis- persed into all cotmtries ; yet that they should not be swal- lowed up and lost among their conquerors, but should subsist, to the latest times, a distinct people ; that, " though God would make an end of the nations, their oppressors, He would not make an end of them." — Fairholme. The names which men and things received at the be- ginning of time, are so strikingly similar to those which they bore when the Hebrew was certainly a living language, that its claim to the honour of being the primeval speech of the human family, can scarcely be rejected. It is ever reckoned a proof of similar origin, when many words in any two languages have the same form, the same sound, meaning, and reason. But the names of the first genera- tions of men, like those of the lower animals, are as pure Hebrew as the names of Peleg, Abraham, Isaac, and Ja- cob, or those of David and Solomon, or Malachi. They have the Hebrew form, are constructed according to He- brew rules, are founded on certain reasons, like Hebrew names; and, in fine, are not to be distinguished in any one respect from pure Hebrew, It deserves also to be remarked, that the reason assign- ed for these names will not correspond with any other lan- guage. The garden of Paradise was called Eden; be- cause among the Hebrews it signifies pleasure or delight. The place of Cain's exile was for this reason called the land of Nod, from a root which signifies to wander. Adam received his name because he was taken out of the ground ; but if the term for ground in the first language had been terra, or yr?, or earth, there had been no proprie- ty in the designation. Eve was called by this name, be- cause she was the mother of all living ; but it is derived from a pure Hebrew verb which signifies to live ; and to this relation the name owes all its propriety and signifi- cance. Cain was named from the Hebrew verb Kana, to possess, because his mother had got him from the Lord ; and in this instance also, the name is inseparably connect- ed with the Hebrew root. The proper name Seth is de- rived from the Hebrew verb Shooth, to appoint; because, said our first mother, God hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. The same mode of reasonirig might be carried through all the names of the Adamiiic age; but these instances are suflicient to show the near affinity, if not the positive identity, of the lan- gnac^e which Adam spoke, with the Hebrew of the Old Testament. The names ascribed by the inspired writer to the found- ers of our race, are not interpretations of primitive terms ; for he declares they are the very names which were given at first ; and as they are derivatives from pure Hebrew verbs, the language then spoken must have been the same in substance and structure. Had they been translations, we have reason to think the same method would have been followed as in several instances in the New Testament, where the original term is used, and the interpretation avowedly subjoined. But Moses gives not a single hint of his translating these terms ; he asserts, on the contrary, that they are the original words employed ; and the truth of his assertion is rendered indubitable by the reasons assigned for their imposition, which are inseparably con- nected with the Hebrew language. Nor does Moses, in the whole course of his history, when speaking of the names of persons and places, utter a single word from which we can infer the existence of an earlier language. When the minute and extensive acquaintance with the natural character and temper of the numerous animals to which our first father gave names in Paradise, which he certainly had not time to acquire by his own industry, and which we have no reason to believe he owed to intuition, is considered, we must admit, that the language in which he conversed was not his own contrivance, but the imme- diate gift of Heaven. When Jehovah breathed into Adam and Eve the breath of life, he inspired them in the same moment with the knowledge of the tongue in which they were to express their thoughts. A similar favour was be- stowed at the beginning of the New Testament dispensa- tion, on the apostles and other ministers of the gospel ; who were inspired in a moment with the perfect knowledge of many diflferent languages. — Paxton. Chap, 4. ver. 3. And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. The margin* reads, " at the end of days;" and this is truly Oriental. " When the days are ended, I will fulfil my promise." " After those days are ended, I shall have peace." " When the days come round, (in their circle,) I will do that for you." — Roberts. Ver. 7. If thou doest well, shalt thou not be ac- cepted ? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him. D'Oyly and Mant interpret this, " Your sin will find you out." "'Thy punishment is not far off'." They also say sin may be rendered sin-offering ; and several other com- mentators take the same view, and think this is its true and only meaning. The victim proper for a sin-offering was lying at the door, and therefore was within his reach. There are some who affect to smile at the idea of sin lying at the door : it is, however, an Eastern figure. Ask a man who is unacquainted with Scripture, what he un- derstands by sin lying at the threshold of the door ; he will immediately speak of it as the guilt of some great crime which the owner had committed. A man accused ot having murdered a child, would be accosted in the follow- ing language : — " If you have done this, think not to es- cape ; no ! for sin will ever lie at your door : it will descend from generation to generation." To a man accused of having committed any other dreadfitl crime, it would be said, " Ah ! if I had done it, do I not know sin would ever lie at my door V The idea is sin personified in the shape of some fierce animal crouched at the door. Its criminality and punishment remain. If Cain had done well, would there not have been " the excellency 1" (see margin ;) but if not well, then sin, like a monster, was crouching at his door. Taking the other view of it, seems to amount to this ; now, Cain, if thou doest well, that will be thy excellency, thou shalt be accept- ed : but if thou doest not well, it is a matter of no very great consequence, because there is a sin-offering at thy door. * I would here observe, once for all, that I have gone regularly through the marginal readings, and have found, with few exception^ that they literally agree with Eastern language in idiom anrl figiire In the course of this work, most of them will be illustrated ; and I think few readers will doubt that they are the tsorrect translations. 14 GENESIS, Chap. 8. nearer than Batoom and other parts of the eastern coast of the Black sea, a distance of seven days journey of a caravan, or about 130 miles in the circuitous route that would thus be taken. But might not a dove make this iourney in a day 1 Or might not the climate then have been warmer than it is now 1 The second objection is drawn from the fact that sonle of the old versions and paraphra- ses, particularly the Chaldee and the Syriac, refer " the mountains of Ararat" to the mountains of Kurdistan, where there is, not far from Jezeereh, a high mountain called Joody, on which the moslems suppose the ark to have rested. But if the ark rested on that, the posterity of Noah would, most likely, have descended at once into Mesopotamia, and have reached Shinar from the north ; while, from the vafley of the Aras, they would naturally have kept along on the eastern side of the mountains of Media, until they reached the neighbourhood of Hamadan or Kermanshah, which is nearly east of Babylon. Such is the route now taken every day by all the caravans from this region to Bagdad. The Armenians believe, not only that this is the mountain on which the ark rested after the flood, but that the ark still exists upon its top ; though, ra- ther from supernatural than from physical obstacles, no one has yet been able to visit it. A devout vartabtd, their legends relate, once attempted, for this purpose, to ascend the mountain. "While yet far from the top, drowsiness came upon him, and he awoke at the bottom, in the very spot whence he had started. Another attempt resulted only in the same miraculous failure. He then betook himself more fervently to prayer, and started the third time. Again he slept, and awoke at the bottom ; but now an angel stood before him with a fragment of the ark, as a token that his pious purpose was approved and his prayer answered, though he could never be allowed to reach the summit of the moimtain. The precious gift was thankfully received, and is to this day carefully preserved, as a sacred relic, in the convent of Echmiadzin. — Smith & Dwight. Ararat forms the angle of an immense chain of moun- tains, on the loftiest pinnacles of which the natives of the country believe that part of the ark yet remains. It is a most sublime and stupendous object, which excites in the mind of the beholder the mingled emotions of admiration and terror. One of the great features of this mountain is the immense chasm which extends nearly half-way down, over which impends a cliif, discernible at a great distance, whose enormous masses of ice are from time to time precip- itated into the abyss with a noise resembling the loudest thunder. " Nothing," says Mr. Morier, " can be more beautiful than its shape ; more awful than its height. Compared with it, all the other mountains sink into insig- nificance. It is perfect in all its parts : no hard rugged features : no imnatural prominences ; every thing is in har- mony ; and all combines to render it one of the most sub- lime objects in nature. Spreading originally from an im- mense base, its slope towards the summit is gradual, until it reaches the regions of the snows, when it becomes more abrupt. The cone is surmounted with a crown of ice, which glitters in the sun with a peculiar and dazzling brightness. As a foil to this stupendous work, a smaller hill rises from the same base, near the original mass, simi- lar to it in shape and proportion, and in any other situation entitled to rank among the high mountains. The moun- tain is divided into three regions of different breadths. The first, composed of a short and slippery grass, or sand as troublesome as the quicksands of Africa, is occupied by the shepherds ; the second, by tigers and crows : the re- mainder, which is half the mountain, is covered with snow which has been accumulating ever since the ark rested npcm it ; and these snows are concealed during one half of the year in very dense clouds." This stupendous moun- tain, Mr. Morier and his party endeavoured to scale ; and after excessive fatigue arrived on the margin of eternal snow. But they found it impossible to proceed and pen- etrate the highest region ; and not easy to go back. At length, utterly exhausted, they reached the bottom, and gave thanks to God for their safe return. — Paxton. [The remarkable achievement of the ascent of Mount Ararat, has at length, it appears, been accomplished by Professor Parrot of England. Taking with him Mr. Behagel as mineralogist, Messrs. Hehn and Schiemann, medical students of Moscow, and Mr. Federow, astron- omer of St. Petersburg, he commenced his journey on the 20th of March, 1829, and arrived'at Tiflis on the 6th of June. Owing to peculiar circumstances they were un- able to leave Titiis till the first of September, the distance to Mount Ararat being by the road about 280 wasts (say 200 miles.) The following account of the ascent, extracted from a work recently published by Professor Parrot, at Berlin, is from the Foreign (Quarterly Review for June, 1835.] At seven o'clock in the morning of the 12th September, I set out on my journey, [from the Convent of St. James' near the foot of the mountain,] accompanied by Mr. Schie mann. We took with us one of our Cossacks and a pea- sant of Arguri, who was a good huntsman, and our route was first in the bottom of the valley, then up its right ac- clivity towards the spot where there are two small stone houses standing close to each other ; the one formerly a chapel, and the other built as a protection for a spring which is considered sacred. From the chapel we crossed the grassy elevation, which forms the right declivity of the cleft : we suffered so much from the heat of the day, that our Cossack, who would prob- ably have much rather been seated on horseback and gal- loping about on the steppes for three days than scrambling over the rocks for a couple of hours, was ready to sink from fatigue, and we were obliged to send him back. At about six o'clock in the evening, when we also were much tired, and had almost reached the snowy region, we chose our night's lodgings in the clefts of the rocks. We had at- tained a height of 11,675 Paris feet; in the sheltered places about us lay some new-fallen snow, and the temperature of the air was at the freezingpoint. Mr. Schiemann and I haxi provided ourselves tolerably well for such an undertaking ; besides, the pleasure of the expedition warmed us ; but our athletic Jagar, Schak of Arguri, (Isaac,) was quite dejected froni the cold, for he had nothing but his summer clothing ; his whole neck and also his legs, from the knee to the san- dal, were quite bare, and his head was only covered with an old handkerchief I had neglected to think about his wardrobe before setting out, and, therefore, it was uiy duly to help him as well as I could: but as neither of us had much clothing to spare, I wrapped up his neck and his bare limbs in sheets of blotting-paper which I had taken with me for drying plants, and this was a great relief to him. At daybreak we pursued our journey towards the eastern side of the mountain, and soon reached'the declivity which runs immediately from the summit ; it consists en- tirely of pointed rocky ridges coming down from above, and leaving between them ravines of considerable depth, in which the icy mantle of the summit loses itself, and gla* ciers of great extent. There were several of these rocky ridges and clefts of ice lying between us and the side of the mountain which we were endeavouring to reach. When we had J^ppily surmounted the first crest and the adjoining beauffml glacier, and reached the second crest, Schak had no courage to proceed. His benumbed limbs had not yet recovered their warmth, and the icy region towards which he saw us hastening, did not hold out much prospect of relief; thus one remained behind from heat and the other from cold — only Mr. Schiemann, though un- accustomed to these hardships, did not for an instant lose his courage or his desire to accompany me, but shared with alacrity and perseverance all the difficulties and dangers* Ave had to encounter. Leaving the Jager behind us, we crossed the second glacier, and gained the third rocky ridge. Then immediately turning off in an oblique direc- tion, we reached the lower edge of the icy crest, at a height of 13,180 Paris feet, and which from this place runs with- out interruption to the summit. We had now to ascend this declivity covered with perpetual snow. Though the inclination was barely 30 deg., this was a sheer impossi- bility for two men to accomplish in a direct line. We there- fore determined to advance diagonally towards a long pointed ridge which runs far up towards the summit. "We succeeded in this by making with our ice-poles deep holes in the ice of the glacier, which was covered with a thin layer of new-fallen snow, too slight to aflford the requisite firmness to our steps. "We thus reached the ridge, and ad- vanced directly towards the summit by a track where the new snow was rather deeper. Though we might by great exertions have this time reached the goal of our wishes, yet the fatigue of the day had been considerable, and as it was already three o'clock in the afternoon, we were Ghap. 8. GENESIS. la obliged to think of providing a lodging for the approaching night. We had attained the extreme upper ndge of the rocky crest, an elevation of 14,560 Paris feet above the level of the sea, (the height of the top of Mount Blanc,) and yet the summit of Ararat lay far above us. I do not think that any insurmountable obstacle could have impeded our farther progress, but to spend the few remaining hours of day light in reaching this point would have been worse than madness, as we had not seen any rock on the summit which could have afforded us protection during the night ; independently of which, our stock of provisions was not calculated to last so long. Having made our barometrical observations, we turned back, satisfied from the result that the mountain on this side was not inaccessible. In descending, however, we met with a danger which we had not anticipated ; for if in the descent of every mountain you tread less safely than in going up, it is still mpre diffi- cult to tread firmly, when you look down upon such a sur- face of ice and snow as that over which we had to pass for more than a werst, and where, if we slipped and fell, there was nothing to stop us but the sharp-pointed masses of stone in which the region of eternal ice loses itself The danger here is perhaps rather in the want of habit than in real difficulties. My young friend, whose courage had probably been proof against severer trials, lost his presence of mind here— his foot slipped, and he fell; but, as he was about twenty paces behind me, I had time to thrift my pole firmly in the ice, to take a sure footing in my capital snow-shoes, and while I held the pole in my right hand, to catch him in passing with my left. My position was well chosen, but the straps which fastened my ice-shoes broke, and, instead of being able to stop my friend, I was carried with him in his fall. He was so fortunate as to be stopped by some stones, but I rolled on for half a werst, till I reached some fragpienls of lava near the lower gla- cier. The tube of my barom^er was dashed to pieces — my chronometer burst open, and covered with blood — every thing had fallen out of my pockets, but I escaped without severe injury. As soon as we had recovered from our fright, and thanked God for our prpvidential escape, we collected the most important of our effects, and con- tinued our journey. "We were soon afterward delighted to hear the voice of our good Schak, who had very pru- dently waited for our return. Having made a fire, we passed the night in the grassy region, and on the third day reached the convent, where we were regaled with an ex- cellent breakfast. We however took care not to tell the Armenians any thing about our accident, as they would certainly not have failed to ascribe it to a judgment from Heaven for our presumptuous attempt to reach the summit, which they say has been prohibited to mortals by a divine decree since the time of Noah. All the Armenians are firmly persuaded that Noah's ark exists to the present day on the summit of Mount Ararat, and that, in order to preserve it, no person is permitted to approach it. We learn the grounds of this tradition from the Armenian chronicles in the legend of a monk of the name of James, who was afterward Patriarch of Nissibus, and a contempo- rary and relative of St. Gregory. It is said that this monk, in order to settle the disputes which had arisen respecting the credibility of the sacred books, especially with refer- ence to their account of Noah, resolved to ascend to the top of Ararat to convince himself of the existence of the ark. At the declivity of the mountain, however, he had several times fallen asleep from exhaustion, and found on awaking that he had been unconsciously carried down to the point from which he first set out. God at length had compassion on his unwearied though fruitless exertions, and during his sleep sent an angel with the message, that his exertions were unavailing, as the summit was inaccessible ; but as a reward for his indefatigable zeal, he sent him a piece of the ark, the verv same which is now preserved as the most valuable relic' in the cathedral of Etschmaidsin. The belief in the impossibility of as- cending Mount Ararat has, in consequence of this tradi- tion, which is sanctioned by the church, almost become an article of faith, which an Armenian would not renounce even if he were placed in his own proper person upon the summit of the mountain. [After recovering in some measure from the effects of his fall and an attack of fever which ensued, the profes- sor set out on the 18th September to make a second at- tempt to gain the summit, taking with him a cross ten feet high, which it was proposed to set up on the top of the mountain, with an inscription in honour of Field Marsha* Count Paskewitsch, by whose victories the Russian do- minions had been extended to this point. They chose this time the northeast side of the mountain, by which the way was much longer, but not so steep. But as this second attempt also failed, wx pass over the account of it, and pro- ceed without further preface to the third, which succeeded. They however erected the cross on an almost horizontal surface covered with snow, at the height of 15,138 Paris feet above the level of the Euxine, or about 350 feet higher than the summit of Mount Blanc] In the meantime the sky cleared up, the air became serene and calm, the mountain too was more quiet, the noise occasioned by the falling of the masses of ice and snow grew less frequent — in short, every thing seemed to indicate that a favourable turn was about to take place in the weather, and I hastened to embrace it for a third at- tempt to ascend the mountain. On the 25th September I sent to ask Stepan whether he would join us, but he de- clined, saying that he had suflered too much from the for- mer excursion to venture again so soon ; he however promised to send us four stout peasants with three oxen and a driver. Early the next morning, four peasants made their appearance at the camp to join our expedition, and soon alter a fifth, w^ho offered himself voluntarily. To them I added two of our soldiers. The deacon again ac- companied us, as well as Mr. Hehn, who wished to explore the vegetation at a greater elevation ; but he did not intend to proceed beyond the line of snow. The experience of the preceding attempt had convinced me that everything depended on our passing the first night as closely as possi- ble to this boundary, in order to be able to ascend and re- turn from the summit in one day, and to confine our bag- gage to what was absolutely necessary. We therefore took with us only three oxen, laden with the clothing, wood, and provisions. I also took a cross carved in oak We chose our route towards the same side as before, and, in order to spare ourselves, Abowiam and I rode on horse- back, wherever the rocky nature of the soil permitted it, as far as the grassy plain Kip-Giholl, whence we sent the horses back. Here Mr. Hehn parted from us. It was scarcely twelve o'clock when we reached this point, and, after taking our breakfast, we proceeded in a direction rather more oblique than on our former attempt. The cattle were, however, unable to follow us so quickly. We therefore halted at some rocks which it would be impossi- ble for them to pass — took each our own share of clothing and wood, and sent back the oxen. At half-past five in the evening we were not far from the snow line, and con- siderably higher than the place where we passed the night on our previous excursion. The elevation at this point was 13,036 Paris feet above the level of the sea, and the large masses of rock determined me to take up our quar- ters here. A fire was soon made, and a warm supper pre- pared. I had some onion broth, a dish which I would recommend to all mountain travellers in preference to meat broth, as being extremely warm and invigorating. This being a fast-day, poor Abowiam was not able to enjoy it. The other Armenians, who strictly adhered to their rules of fasting, contented themselves with bread and the brandy which I distributed among them in a limited quan- tity, as this cordial must be taken with great caution, espe- cially where the strength has been previously much tried, as it otherwise produces a sense of exhaustion and inclina- tion to sleep. It was a magnificent evening, and, with my eyes fixed on the clear sky, and the lofty summit which projected against it, and then again on the dark night which was gathering far below and around me, I experi- enced all those delightful sensations of tranquillity, love, and devotion, that silent reminiscence of the past, that sub- dued glance into the future, which a traveller never fails to experience when on lofty elevations, and under pleasing circumstances. I laid myself down under an overhanging rock of lava, the temperature of the air at 4 1-2 degrees, which was tolerably Avarm, considering our great height. At daybreak we rose, and began our journey at half past six. We crossed the last broken declivities in half an hour, and entered the boundary of eternal snow nearly at the same place as in our preceding ascent. In consequence of the increased warmth of the weather, the new-fallen 16 GENESIS. Chap. 8. snow, which had facilitated our progress on our previous ascent, had melted away, and again frozen, so that, in spite of the still inconsiderable slope, we were compelled to cut steps in the ice. This very much embarrassed our ad- vance, and added greatly to our fatigue. One of the pea- sants had remained behind in our resting-place, as he felt unwell; two others became exhausted in ascending the side of ihe glacier. They at first lay down, but soon re- treated to our quarters. Without being disheartened by these difiiculties, we proceeded, and soon reached the great cleft which marks the upper edge of the declivity of the large glacier, and at ten o'clock we arrived at the great plain of snow which marks the first break on the icy head of Ararat. At the distance of a werst, we saw the cross which we had reared on the 19th of September, but it ap- peared to me so extremely small, probably on account of its black colour, that I almost doubted whether I should be able to find it again with an ordinary telescope from the plain of the Aiaxes. In the direction towards the summit, a shorter but at the same time a steeper declivity than the one we had passed lay before us ; and between this and the extreme summit there appeared to be only one small hill. After a short repose we passed the first precipice, which was the steepest of all, by hewing out steps in the rock, and after this the next elevation. But here, instead of seeing the ultimate goal of all our difficulties, immediately before us appeared a series of hills, which even concealed the summit from our sight. This rather abated our courage, which had never yielded for a moment so long as we had all our difficulties in view, and our strength, exhausted by the labour of hewing the rock, seemed scarcely commen- surate with the attainment of the now invisible object of our wishes. But a review of what had been already accom- plished, and of that which might still remain to be done, the proximity of the series of projecting elevations, and a glance at my brave companions, banished my fears, and we boldly advanced. We crossed two more hills, and the cold air of the summit blew towards us. I stepped from behind one of the glaciers, and the extreme cone of Ara- rat lay distinctly before my enraptured eyes. But one more efibrt was necessar-y. Only one other icy plain was to be ascended, and at a quarter past three on the 27th of Septem- ber, O. S., 1829, we stood on the summit of Mount Ararat ! [Having thus happily accomplished his fatiguing and per- ilous enterprise, says the Review, our author's first wish and enjoyment was repose; he spread his cloak on the ground, and sitting down, contemplated the boundless but desolate prospect around him. He was on a slight con- vex, almost circular, platform, about 200 Paris feet in di- ameter, which at the extremity declines pretty steeply on all sides, particularly towards the S. E. and N. E. ; it was the silver crest of Ararat, composed of eternal ice, unbro- ken by a rock or stone. Towards the east, the summit de- clined more gently than in any other direction, and was connected by a hollow, likewise covered with perpetual ice, with another rather lower summit, which by Mr. Fede- row's trigonometrical measurement was found to be 187 toises distant from the principal summit. On account of the immense distances nothing could be seen distinctly. The whole valley of the Araxes was covered with a gray mist, through which Erivan and Sardarabad appeared as small dark spots ; to the south were seen more distinctly the hills behind which lies Bayazeed ; to the N. W. the ragged top of Alaghes, covered with vast masses of snow, probably an inaccessible summit ; near to Ararat, espe- cially to the S. E. and at a great distance towards the west, are numerous small conical hills, which look like extinct volcanoes ; to the E. S. E. was little Ararat, whose head did not appear like a cone, as it does from the plain, but like the top of a square truncated pyramid, with larger and smaller rocky elevations on the edges and in the middle ; but what very much surprised Professor Parrot was to see a large portion of Lake Goktschai, which appeared in the N. E. like a beautiful shining dark blue patch, behind the lofty chain of mountains which encloses it on the south, und which is so high that he never could have believe JO long a time. In this manner the Arabs journey, and find their homes, their hearths, and their country, in every lace." — BuRDEK. Ver. 7. And there was a strife between the herd- men of Abram's cattle and the herdmen of Lot's cattle. How often have I been reminded of the strife of the herd- men of the scriptures, by seeing, on a distant plain, a num- ber of shepherds or husbandmen struggling together re- specting some of the same causes which promoted strife in the patriarchal age. The fields are not, as in England, enclosed by fences ; there is simply a ridge which divides one from another. Hence the cattle belonging to one per- son find no difficulty in straying into the field of another, and the shepherds themselves have so little principle, that they gladly take advantage of it. Nothing is more com- mon than for a man, when the sun has gone down, thus to injure his neighbour. The time when most disputes take place, is when the paddy, or rice, has been newly cut, as the grass left among the stubble is then long and green. The herdmen at that time become very tenacious, and wo to the ox, if within reach of stick or stone, until he shall get into* his OAvn field. Then the men of the other party start up on seeing their cattle beaten, and begin to swear and decla'-e h»iw often the others have done the saine thing. They now approach each other, vociferating the most op- probrious epithets: the hands swiftly move about in every direction ; one pretends to take up a stone, or spits on the ground in token of contempt ; and then comes the contest — the long hair is soon dishevelled, and the weaker fall be- neath their antagonists. Then begins the beating, biting, and scratching, till in their cruel rage they have nearly destroyed some of the party. The next business is with the magistrate: all are clamorous for justice; and great must be his patience, and great his discernment, to find out the truth. Another common cause of strife is that which took place between the herdmen of Gerar and those of Isaac. Water is at all times very precious in the East, but especially in the dry season ; as the tanks are then nearly exhausted, and what remains is scarcely fit for use. At that time recourse must be had to the wells ; which are often made at the ex- pense or labour of five, ten, or twenty people. Here, then, is the cause of contention. One man has numerous herds ; he gets i\veve first, and almost exhausts the well ; the others come, and, seeing what is done, begin the affray. But the most common cause of quarrel is when the owners of the well have to irrigate their lands from the same source. To prevent these contests, they have generally each an ap- pointed time for watering their lands ; or, it may be, that those who get there first, shall have the privilege : but where there is so little integrity, it is no wonder there should be so much strife. — Roberts. Ver. 10. And Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt, as thou comest unto Zoar. The Jordan flows from the Lake of Genesareth to the Dead Sea, betAveen two ridges of moderately high moun- tains, in a valley that may be about twelve miles in breadth. This valley opens at Jericho, and encloses within it the Dead Sea, which is surrounded by a circle of mountains. Before the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah there was, however, no lake here ; but all this was a vallev, which Moses calls the vale of Siddim. It is probable, that even at that time there was a lake under this valley, in which the Jordan discharged itself, which otherwise could have had no vent. This subterraneous lake was covered with a thick coat of earth, on which, besides Sodom and Gomor- rah, other cities stood. This being the nature of the ground, it could never be deficient in the requisite moist- ure, and besides it was doubtless watered by canals sup- plied from the Jordan. In this view Moses compares ii with Egypt, which was watered by innumerable canaLs led from the Nile, and cultivated like a garden. — Burder. Chap. 14. ver. 3. All these were joined together in the vale of Siddim, which is the salt sea. The lake Asphaltites, or the Dead Sea, is enclosed on the east and west with exceeding high mountains ; on the north it is bounded with the plain of Jericho, on which side it receives the waters of the Jordan ; on the south it is open, and extends beyond the reach of the eye. It is said to be twenty-four leagues long, and six or seven broad ; and is fringed with a kind of coppice of bushes and reeds. In the midst of this border, not a furlong from the sea, rises a fountain of brackish water, which was pointed out to Maundrell by his Arab conductor ; a sure proof that the soil is not equally impregnated with saline particles. The ground, to the distance of half an hour from the sea, is uneven and broken into hillocks, which Mr. Maundrell compares to ruinous lime-kilns ; but whether these might be the pits at Avhich the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah were overthrown by the four kings who invaded their country, he could not determine. — Paxton. As it has no outlet, Reland, Pococke, and other trav- ellers, have supposed that it must throw off its superfluous waters by some subterraneous channel; but, although it has been calculated that the Jordan daily discharges into it 6,090,000 tons of water, besides what it receives from the Arnon and several smaller streams, it is now known, that the loss by evaporation is adequate to explain the absorption of the waters. Its occasional rise and fall at certain sea-, sons, is doubtless owing to the greater or less volume which the Jordan and the other streams bring down from the mountains. — Modern Traveller. The water of the lake is intensely salt, extremely bitter and nauseous, and so heavy, that the most impetuous winds can scarcely ruffle its surYace. It is called by common writers the Dead Sea, because it nourishes neither animal nor vegetable life. No verdure is to be seen on its banks, nor fish to be found within its waters ; but it is not true that its exhalations are so pestiferous as to kill birds that attempt to fly over it. Mr. Maundrell saw several birds flying about, and skimming the surface of its waters, with- out any visible harm. The same fact is attested by Vol- ney, who states it as no uncommon thing to see swallows dipping for the water necessary to build their nests. The true cause that deprives it of vegetables and animals, is the extreme saltness of the water, which is vastly stronger than that of the sea. The soil around it, impregnated also with salt, produces no plants ; and the air itself, which becomes loaded with saline particles from evaporation, and which receives also the sulphureous and bituminous vapours, can- not be favourable to vegetation : hence the deadly aspect which reigns around this lake. The ground about it, how- ever, is not marshy, and its waters are limpid and incor- ruptible, as must be the case with a dissolution of salt. Mr. Maundrell questions the truth of the common tradition, which is admitted by Volney in all its extent, that the waters of the Dead Sea are destructive to animal existence, having observed among the pebbles on the shore two or three shells of fish, resembling oyster-shells. [Mr. Mad- den, however, savs. Travels, vol. 2, p. 210, " I found seve- ral fresh water shells on the beach, such as I before noticed on the Lake of Tiberias ; and also the putrid reiiiains of two small fish, of the size of mullet ; which no doubt had been carried down from the Jordan, as well as the shells for I am well convinced, both from my own observatioi and from the accounts of the Arabs, that no living creature is to be found in the Dead Sea."] That respectable travel- ler, willing to make an experiment of its strength, went into it, and found it bore up his body in swimming, with an uncommon force ; but the relation of some authors, thaJ men wading in it are buoyed up to the top as soon as thi water reaches to the middle, he found upon experiment un true. Pococke, however, says : " I was much pleased wit] what I observed of this extraordinary' water, and stayed ii it near a quarter of an hour. I found I could lay on it ii any posture, without motion, and without sinking. It ho- me up in such a manner, that, when I struck in swimming my legs were above the water, and I found it diflicult tc •ft I Chap. 14. GENESIS. 21 recover my feet. I did not care to venture where it was deep, though these eifects would probably have been more remarkable farther in. They have a notion that if any one attempted to swim over, it would burn up the body ; and they say the same of boats, for there are none on the lake." Van Egmont and Heyman state, that on swimming to some distance from the shore, they found themselves, to their great surprise, lifted up by the water. " When I had swam to some distance, I endeavoured to sink perpendicu- larly to the bottom, but could not ; for the water kept me continually up, and would certainly have throwm me upon my face, had I not put forth all the strength I was master of, to keep myself in a perpendicular posture ; so that I walked in the sea as if I had trod on firm ground, without having occasion to make any of the motions necessary in treading fresh water ; and when I was swimming, I was obliged to keep my legs the greatest part ot the time out of the water. My fellow-traveller was agreeably surprised to find that he could swim here, having never learned. But his case and mine proceeded from the gravity of the water, as this certainly does from the extraordinary quantity of salt in it." —Modern Traveller. About six in the morning, says Mr. Madden, I reached die shore, and much against the advice of my excellent ?uide, I resolved on having a bath. I was desirous of ascertaining the truth of the assertion, that " nothing sinks in the Dead Sea." I swam a considerable distance from the shore ; and about four yards from the beach I was Deyond my depth : the water was the coldest I ever felt, and the taste of it most detestable ; it was that of a solution of nitre, mixed with an infusion of quassia. Its buoyancy I found to be far greater than that of any sea I ever swam in, not excepting the Euxine, which is extremely salt. I could lie like a log of wood on the surface, without stirring hand or foot, as long as I chose ; but with a good deal of exertion I could just dive sufficiently deep to cover all my body, but I was again thrown on the surface, in spite of my endeavours to descend lower. On coming out, the wounds in my feet pained me excessively ; the poisonous quality of the waters irritated the abraded skin, and ulti- mately made an ulcer of every wound, which confined me fifteen days in Jerusalem; and became so troublesome in Alexandria, that my medical attendant was apprehensive of gangrene. — Madden. The question of its specific gravity, indeed, has been set to rest by the chymical analysis of the waters made by Dr. Marcet, and published in the London Philosophical Transactions for 1807. In 1778, Messrs. Lavoisier, Mac- quer, and Le Sage, had concluded, by experiment, that a hundred pounds of the water contain forty-five pounds six ounces of salt ; that is, six pounds four ounces of common marine salt, and thirty-eight pounds two ounces of marine salt with an earthy base. But Dr. Marcet's more accurate analysis has determined the specific gravity to be 1,211, (that of the fresh water being 1000,) a degree of density not to be met with in any other natural wat^r ; and it holds in solution the following salts, in the stated proportions to 100 grains of the water :— Muriate of lime 3,920 grains Muriate of magnesia 10.246 Muriate of soda 10,360 Sulphate of lime 0,0M 24,580 So that the water of the lake contains about one fourth of its weight of salts, supposed in a state of perfect desicca- tion ; or if they be desiccated at the temperature of 180^ on Fahrenheit's scale, they will amount to forty-one per cent, of the water. Its other general properties are, that, 1. As stated by all travellers, it is perfectly transparent. 2. Its *.aste is extremely bitter, saline, and pungent. 3. Re- age^^ts demonstrate in it the presence of the marine and sulphuric acids. 4. It contains no alumine. 5. It is not saturated with common salt. 6. It did not change the col- ours of the infusions commonly used .o ascertain the prev- alence of an acid or an alkali, such as litmus, violet, and tumeric. Mr. Maundrell neither saw nor heard of the apples of Sodom, so frequently mentioned by the ancients ; nor did he discover any tree near the lake, from which a fruit of that kind might be expected. It is a production which ex- tets only in the imagination and song of the poet ; and has perhaps been kept up so long, because it furnished him with a good allusion, or helped him to a beautiful simile. Several travellers, however, claim the honour of having discovered that far-famed apple. Hasselquist says, the apple of Sodom is not the fruit either of a tree or of a shrub, but the production of the solanum melongena of Linnaeus. It is found in great abundance round Jericho, in the vales near the Jordan, and in the neighbourhood of the Dead Sea. Its apples are sometimes full of dust ; but this appears only when the fruit is attacked by. an insect, which converts the whole of the inside into dust, leaving nothing but the rind entire, without causing it to lose any of its colour. JNl, Seetzen supposes it is the fruit of a tree which grows on the plain of El Gor, near the southern extremity of the Dead Sea. The tree resem-bles a fig-tree, and the fruit is like the pomegranate : it struck him, that this fruit, which hafe no pulp or flesh in the inside, but only a species of cotton resembling silk, and is unknown in the rest of Palestine, might be the celebrated apple of Sodom. Chateaubriand imagines that he has made the interesting discovery. The shrub which bears, in his opinion, the true apple of Sodom, grows two or three leagues from the mouth of the Jordan ; it is thorny, and has small taper leaves ; its fruit is exactly like the little Eg3T)tian lemon, both in size and colour : be- fore it is ripe, it is filled Avith a corrosive and saline juice ; when dried, it yields a blackish seed, which may be com- pared to ashes, and which resembles loitter pepper in taste. He gathered half a dozen of these fruits, but nas no name for them, either popular or botanical. Next comes Mr. Jollifie. He found in a thicket of brushwood, about half a mile from the plain of Jericho, a shrub of five or six feet high, on which grew clusters of fruit, about the size of a small apricot, of a bright yellow colour, "which, contrast- ing with the delicate verdure of the foliage, seemed like the union of gold and emeralds. Possibly, when ripe, they may crumble into dust upon any violent pressure." Those which this gentleman gathered did not crumble, nor even retain the slightest mark of indenture from the touch ; they would seem to want, therefore, the most essential character- istic of the fruit in question. But they were not ripe. This shrub is probably the same as that described by Chateau- briand. Lastly, Captains Irby and Mangles have no doubt that they have discovered it in the oskar plant, which they noticed on the shores of the Dead Sea, grown to the sta- ture of a tree ; its trunk measuring, in many instances, two feet or more in circumference, and the boughs at least fif- teen feet high. The filaments enclosed in the fruit, some- what resemble the down of a thistle, and are used by the natives as a stuffing for their cushions ; " they likewise twist them, like thin rope, into matches for their guns, which, they assured us, required no application of sulphur to render them combustible." This is probably the same tree that M. Seetzen refers to. But still, the correspondence to the ancient description is by no means perfect; there being little resemblance between cotton and thistle-down, and ashes or dust. M. Chateaubriand's golden fruit, full of bitter seed, comes the nearest to what is told us of the deceitful apple. If it be any thing more than a fable, it must have been a production peculiar to this part of Pales- tine, or it would not have excited such general attention. On this account, the oskar and the solanum seem alike unentitled to the distinction; and for the same reason, the pomegranate must altogether be excluded from considera- tion. The fruit of the solaniwi melongena, which belongs to the same genus as the common potato, is white, resem- bling a large egg, and is said to impart an agreeable acid flavour to soups and sauces, for the sake of which it is cultivated in the south of Europe. This could hardly be what Tacitus and Josephus referred to. It is possible, indeed, that what they describe, may have originated, like the oak-galls in this country, in the work of some insect: for these remarkable productions sometimes acquire a con- siderable size and beauty of colour. Future travellers will be inexcusable if they leave this question undecided. — Modern Traveller. The far-famed fruit of the tree of Sodom, " which tempts the eye and turns to ashes on the lips," is nowhere to be found on the western shore; and Burckhardt appears to favour the opinion of its having only an imaginary exist- ence: but it does exist in the vicinity of El Ghor. I saw one of the npples at Mar Saba; and, perhaps, the only plant in Egypt producing this fruit I discovered at Koum 22 GENESIS. Chap. 14. Omhos, in Upper Eg}T)t, growing in a comer of the small temple of Isis, facing the Nile; the plant was not quite the height of the Palma Christi, the fruit was the size of the pomegranate ; indeed, from the similarity of the fruit and leaves, I consider the Dead Sea apple as a spurious pome- granate. It was, indeed, tempting to the eye, but deceitful to the sense ; on opening it, it was quite empty, the surface of the liud having only a light floculent sort of cotton atta^^hed to it, which was destroyed by the lightest touch ; thii was the true Dead Sea apple which I saw in Egypt, and which I also found in Mar Saba; albeit Shaw and Pococke doubt its existence. — Madden. The extreme saltness of this lake, has been ascribed by Volney to mines of fossil salt in the side of the mountains, which extend along the western shore, and from time im- memorial have supplied the Arabs in the neighbourhood, and even the city of Jerusalem. He does not attempt to invalidate the credit of the Mosaic narrative; but only insinuates, that these saline depositions were either coeval with the mountains in which they are found, or entered into their original conformation. The extraordinary fruit- fulness of the vale of Siddim, before the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, is asserted by Moses in terms so clear and precise, that the veracity of the sacred writer must be overthrown, before a reasonable doubt can be entertained of the fact. No disproportionate quantity of saline matter, could then have been present, either in the soil or in the surrounding mountains. That it abounded with bitumen, some have inferred from the assertion of Moses, that the vale of Siddim was full of slime pits: where the Hebrew word chemar, which we render slime, others, and particularly the Seventy interpreters, render i bitumen. But gophrith, and not chemar, is the word that Moses employs to denote brimstone, in his account of the i judgment which overwhelmed the cities of the plain; and i by consequence, brimstone is not meant, when chemar is used, but bitumen, a very different Substance. Hence the brimstone which now impregnates the soil of the salt sea, and banishes almost every kind of vegetation from its shores, must be regarded, not as an original, but an accidental ingredient, remaining from the destruction of the vale by fire and brimstone from heaven. The same remark applies to the mines of fossil salt, on the surround- ing mountains; the saline matter was deposited in the cavities which it now occupies at the same time, else the vale of Siddim, instead of verdant pastures, and abundant harvests, had exhibited the same frightful sterility from the beginning, for which it is so remarkable in modern times. Bitumen, if the Hebrew word chemar denotes that substance, abounds in the richest soils ; for in the vale of Shinar, whose soil, by the agreement of all writers, is fer- tile in the highest degree, the builders of the tower of Babel used it for mortar. The ark of bulrushes in which Moses was embarked on the Nile, was in like manner daubed with bitumen (chemar) and pitch ; but the mother of Mo- ses, considering the poverty of her house, cannot be sup- posed to have procured it from a distance, nor at any great expense : she must therefore have found it in the" soil of Egypt, near the Nile, on whose borders she lived. It is therefore reasonable to suppose, that bitumen abounded in Goshen, a region famed for the richness of its pastures. Hence it may be fairly concluded, that the vale of Siddim, before its destruction, in respect of natural fertility, re- sembled the plain of Shinar, and the land of Egypt along the Nile, But it is well known, that wherever brimstone and saline matter abound, there sterility and desolation reign. Is it not then reasonable to infer, that the sulphu- reous and saline matters, discovered in the waters and on the shores of the Asphaltites, are the relics of the divine vengeance executed on the cities of the plain, and not original ingredients in the soil. If we listen to the testi- mony of the sacred writers, what was reasonable hypothe- sis rises into absolute certainty. Mo'^es expressly ascribes the brimstone, the salt, and the burning: in the overthrow of Sodom, to the immediate vengeance of Heaven ; " When they see the plagues of that land, . . . tRat the whole land is bnm^+one, and salt, and burning; that it is not sown, norbeareth, nor any grass groweth thereon, (like the over- throw I f Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboira, which the Lord overthrew in his anger, and in his wrath ;) even all nations shall say, Wherefore has Ae Lord done thus unto this land ? What meaneth the heat of this great anger"?" In this passage, the brimstone, salt, and burning, are mentioned as true and proper effects of the 'divine wrath; and since this fearful destruciion is compared to the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah, the brimstone and salt into which the vale of Siddim was turned, must also be the true and proper effects of divine anger. This, in- deed, Moses asserts in the plainest terms : " Then the Lord rained upon Sodom, and upon Gomorrah, brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven ; and he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground." But since the brimstone and the fire were rained from heaven, so must the salt, with which they are connected in the former quotation : and this is the opinion received by the Jewish doctors. The frightful sterility which followed the brim- stone, salt, and burning, in the first quotation, is in the same manner represented as an effect of the divine judg- ■ ment upon the vale of Siddim; "it is not sown, norbear- eth, nor any grass groweth thereon." — Paxton. Chateaubriand says: "Several travellers, and, among others, Troilo and d'Arvieux, assert, that they remark- ed fragments of walls and palaces in the Dead Sea. This statement seems to be confirmed by Maundreil and Fa- tJier Nau. The ancients speak more positively on this , subject. Josephus,- employing a poetic expression, says, hat he perceived on the banks of the lake, the shades of le overwhelming cities. Strabo gives a circumference of sixty stadia to the ruins of Sodom, which are mentioned also by Tacitus. I know not whether they still exist; but, as the' lake rises and falls at certain seasons, it is possible that it may alternately cover and expose the skeletons of the reprobate cities." Mr. Jollitfe mentions the same story. " We have even," he says, " heard it asserted with confidence, that broken columns and other architectural ruins are visible at certain seasons, when the water is much retired below its usual level ; but of this statement our informers, wheii closely pres-^ed, could not adduce any satisfactory confirmation." _ We are afraid that, notwith- standing the authori ^ of Strabo, we must class this legend with the dreams of imagination ; or perhaps its origin may be referred to some such optical delusion as led to the mis- take respecting the supposed isle^nd. In the travels ot Egmont and Heyman, however, there is a statement which may throw some light on the subject. They say : " We also saw here a kind of jutty or prominence, which appear? to have been a heap of stones from time to time thrown up by the sea ; but it is a current opinion here, that they are part of the ruins of one of the towns which are buried under it." The bare possibility, that any wreck of the guilty cities should be brought to light, is sufficient to ex- cite an intense curiosity to explore this mysterious flood, which, so far as appears from any records, no bark has ever ploughed, no plummet ever sounded. Should permis- sion ever be obtained from the Turks, to launch a vessel on the lake, its aavigation, if practicable, would probably lead to some interesting results. — Modern Traveller. Ver. 10. And the vale of Siddim icas full of slime-pits ; and the kings of Sodom and Go- morrah fled, and fell there : and they that re- mained fled to the mountain. People retired to the movvtaivs anciently when defeat- ed in war : they do so still. Dr. Shaw indeed seems to sup- pose, that there was no greater safety in the hills than in the plains of this country : that there were few or no places of difficult access ; and that both of them lay equal- ly exposed to the insults and outrages of an enemy. But in this point this ingenious writer seems to be mistaken ; since, as we find that those that remained of the armies of the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled to the mount- ains, in the days of Abraham, Gen. xiv. 10; so d'.'* rvieux tells us, that the rebel peasants of the Holy La:..', who were defeated while they were in that country by the Arabs, in the plain of Goiiin, fled towards the mountains, whither the Arabs could not pursue them at that time. So, in like manner, the Archbishop of Tyre tells us, that Baldwin IV. of the croisade kings of Jerusalem, rava- ging a place called the valley of Bacar, a country remark- ably fruitful, the inhabitants fled to the mountains, whither our troops could not easily follow them. This flying to Chap. 14. GENESIS. 23 hills and mountains for safety, is frequently alluded to in Scriptilre. — Harmjeh. Ver. 14. And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained ser- vants born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan. If we should turn our thoughts to the strength of an Arab emir, or the number of men they command, we shall find it is not very great, and that were Abraham now alive, jind possessed of the same degree of strength that he had in his time, he would still be consid£red as a prince among them, and might, perhaps, even be called a mighty prince, he having three hundred and eighteen servants able to 1)3ar arms, Gen. xiv. 14, especially in the Eastern com- plimental style : for this is much like the strength of those Arab emirs of Palestine dArvieux visited. There were, according to him, eighteen emirs or princes that governed the Arabs of Mount Carmel ; the grand emir, or chief of these princes, encamped in the middle, the rest round about him, at one or two leagues distance from him, and from each other ; each of these emirs had a number of Arabs particularly attached to him, who called themselves his servants, and were properly the troops each emir com- manded when they fought; and when all these. divisions were united, they made up between four and five thousand fighting men. Had each of these emirs been equal in strength to Abraham, their number of fighting men must have been near six thousand, for three hundred and eighteen, the number of his servants, multiplied by eighteen, the number of those emirs, make five thousand seven hun- dred and twenty-four ; but they were but between four and five thousand, so that they had but about two hundred and fifty each, upon an average. Abraham then was superior in force to one of these emirs. But though Abraham was a man of power, and did upon occasion make war, yet I hope a remark I before made concerning him will be re- membered here, that is, that he was a pacific emir not- withstanding, at least, that he by no means resembled the modern Arabs in their acts of depredation and violence. — Harmer, Ver. 15. And he divided himself against them, he and his servants, by night, and smote them, and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus. The manner in which the Arabs harass the caravans of the East, is described in the same page. Chardin tells us, " that the manner of their making war, and pillaging the caravans, is, to keep by the side of them, or to follow them in the rear, nearer or farther off, according to their forces, which it is very easy to do in Arabia, whidh is one great plain, and in the night they silently fali upon the camp, and carry off one part of it before the rest are got under arms." He supposes that Abraham fell upon the camp of the four kings, that had carried away Lot, pre- cisely in the same Arab manner, and by that means, with unequal forces, accomplished his design,, and rescued Lot. Gen. xiv. 15, he thinks, shows this ; and he adds, that it is to be remembered, that the combats of the age of Abraham more resembled a fight among the mob, than the bloody and destructive wars of Europe. — Harmer. Ver. 17. And the king of Sodom went out to meet him. The conduct of this king, of Abraham, bf Lot, of Saul, of the father of the prodigal, and of many others, is beauti- fully illustrated by the manners of the East, at this day. Not to meet a friend, or an expected guest, would be con- sidered as rude in the extreme. So soon as the host hears of the approach of his visitant, he and his attendants go forth in courtly style ; and when they meet him, the host addresses him, " Ah ! this is a happy day for me ; by your favour I am found in health." He will then, perhaps, put his arm round his waist, or gently tap him on the shoulder, as they proceed towards the house. When at the door, he againmalfes his boM', and politely ushers him in; and the rest joyfully follow, congratulating each other on the hap- py meeting. — Roberts. Ver. 22. And Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lifted up my hand unto the Lord, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth, 23. That I will not take from a thread even to a shoe-latchet, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich. The use of shoes may be traced to the patriarchal age ; Abraham protested to the king of Sodom, after his victory over Amraphel and his associates, " I have lifted up mine hand unto the Lord, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth, that I will not take from a thread even to a shoe-latchet." And when the Lord appeared to Moses in the bush, he commanded him to put off his shoes from his feet, for the place on which he stood was holy ground. In imitation of this memorable example, the priests officiated in the temple barefoot ; and all the orientals, under the guidance of tradition, put off their shoes when they enter their holy places. The learned Bochart is of opinion, that the Israelites used no shoes in Egj^pt ; but being to take a long journey, through a rough and barren wilderness, God commanded them to eat the passover with shoes on their feet ; and those very shoes which they put on at that festi- val, when they were ready to march, he suffered not to decay during the whole forty years they traversed the desert ; and to increase the miracle, Grotius adopts the idle conceit of some Jewish writers, that their clothes en- larged as they grew up to maturity, and their shoes also underwent a similar enlargement. This was not impos- sible with Jehovah, but it seems to have been quite unne- cessary, for the clothes and shoes of those that died, might serve their children when they grew up ; and it was suf- ficiently wonderful, without, such an addition, that their clothes should not decay, nor their shoes wear, nor their feet swell, by travelling over hot and sandy deserts for the long period of forty years. It only remains to be observed, on this part of the subject, that no covering for the foot can exclude the dust in those parched regions; and by con- sequence, the custom of washing and anointing the feet, which is, perhaps, coeval with the existence of the human race, is not to be ascribed to the use of sandals. What- ever covering for the foot may be used, Chardin declares, it is still necessary to wash and anoint the feet after a journey. It is also the custom everywhere among the Asiatics, to carry a stafi' in their hand, and a handkerchief to wipe the sweat from their face. The handkerchiefs are wrought with a needle ; and to embroider and adorn them, is one of the elegant amusements of the other sex. — Paxton. To lift up the right hand with the fingers towards heav- en is equivalent to an oath. Hence Dr. Boothroyd has rendered the passage, " I sivear to Jehovah." To lift up the hand in confirmation of any thing is considered a most sacred way of swearing. In Isaiah Ixii. 8. it is written, " The Lord hath sworn by his right hand." It is an in- teresting fact, that many of the images of the gods of the heathen have the right hand lifted up, which to the under- standing of the people, says, " lavi Cod; I am truth-; I my- self ; I am. Fear not.'" Does a man make a solemn proni- ise, and should the person to whom it is made express a doubt; he will say, "Lift up your hand;'''' which means, swear that you will perform it. — Roberts. Ver. 23. That I will not take from a thread even to a shoe-latchet, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich. This may refer to the red thread worn round the neck or the arm, and which binds on the amulet; or the string with Vv^hich females tie up their hair. The latchet I sup- pose to mean the thong of the sandal, which goes over the top of the foot, and betwixt the great and little toes. It is proverbial to say, should a man be accused of taking away some valuable article, which belongs to another, " I have not taken away even a piece of the thong of your worn-out sandals." — Roberts. Chap. 1.5. ver. 3. And Abram said, Behold, tome thou hast given no seed : and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir. 24 GENESIS. Chap. 16. Though the slaves in the oriental regions were treated with more severity than hired servants, their condition was by no means ' reckoned so degrading as in modern times, among the civilized nations of the west. The slave- master in the East, when he has no son to inherit his wealth, and even when the fortune he has to bequeath is very considerable, frequently gives his daughter to one of his slaves. The wealthy people of Barbary, when they have no children, purchase young slaves, educate them in their own faith, and sometimes adopt them for their own children. This custom, so strange and unnatural, accord- ing to our modes of thinking, may be traced to a very remote antiquity ; it seems to have prevailed so early as the days of Abraham, who says of one of his slaves, " One born in mine house is mine heir :" although Lot, his bro- ther's son, resided in his neighbourhood, and he had besides many relations in Mesopotamia. In the courts of eastern monarchs, it is well known, that slaves frequently rise to the highest honours of the state. The greatest men in the Turkish empire are originally slaves, reared and educated in the seraglio. When Maillet was in Egypt, there was a eunuch who had raised three of his slaves to the rank of princes ; and he mentions a Bey who exalted five or six of his slaves to the same office with himself. With these facts before us, we have no reason to question the veracity of the inspired writers, who record the extraor- dinary advancement of Joseph in the house of Pharaoh, and of Daniel, under the monarch of Babylon. These sudden elevations, from the lowest stations in society, from the abject condition of a slave, or the horrors of a dungeon, to the highest and most honourable offices of state, are quite consistent with the established manners and customs of those countries. — Paxton. Ver. 17. And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed be- tween those pieces. Several eminent critics believe the lamp of fire was an emblem of the Divine presence, and that it ratified the cov- enant with Abram. It is an interesting fact that the burn- ing lamp or fire is still used in the East in confirmation of a covenant. Should a person in the evening make a solemn promise to perform something for another, and should the latter doubt his word, the former will say, pointing to the iiame of the lamp, " That is the witn£ss." On occasions of greater importance, when two or more join in a covenant, should the fidelity of any be questioned, they will say, " We invoke the lamp of the Temple" (as a witness.) When an agreement of this kind has been broken, it will be said, " Who would have thought this 1 for the lamp of the Tem- ple was invoked." That^re was a symbol of the Divine presence, no one acquainted with the sacred scriptures can deny ; and in the literature and customs of the East, the same thing is still asserted. In the ancient writings, where the marriages of the gods and demigods are des- cribed, it is always said the ceremony was performed in the presence of the god of fire. He was the witness. But it is also a general practice, at the celebration of respecta- ble marriages at this day, to have a. fire as a witness of the transaction. It is made of the wood of the Mango-tree, or the Aal or Arasu, or Panne or Paldsu. The fire being kindled in the centre of the room, the young coiiple sit on stools ; but when the Brahmin begins to repeat the incan- tations, they arise, and the bridegroom puts the little finger of his left hand roimd the little finger of the right hand of the bride, and they walk round the fire three times from left to right. " Fire is the witness of their covenant; and if they break it, fire will be their destruction.^' In the Scanda Purana, the father of the virgin who was to be married to the son of the Rishi, said to him, " Call your son, that I may give him to my daughter in the presence of the god of fire, that he may be the ^vitness;" that being done, " Ilsteyar gave his daughter Verunte in marriage, the fire being the witness." — Roberts. Chap. 16. ver 2. I pray thee, go in unto my maid ; it may be that 1 may obtain children by her. The Hebrew has, " Be builded by her." When a wife has been for some time considered steril. should she have a child, she is said to be making her house new, ox rather, she has caused the house to be newly built. When a man marries, " he is making a new house." — Roberts. Ver. 12. And he will be a wild man ; his hand will he against every man, and every man's hand against him : and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren. The phrase, " a wild man," it is well known, is in the original text, " a wild ass man," that is, a man like a wild ass in teniper and manners. The comparison seems to re- fer, first to Ishmael himself, and to intimate certain lead- ing traits in his character ; and then to his offspring in every succeeding age. The troops of onagers, are con- ducted by a leading stallion, that prefers the most arid des- erts of the mountains, keeps watch while his companions repose, and gives the signal at the appearance of an enemy. The Nomades of Asia report of these animals, that the first of a troop which sees a serpent or a beast of prev, makes a certain cry, which brings, in a moment, the whole herd around him, when each of them strives to destroy it instantly. Such were the character and manners of Ish- mael. "He was the first prince of his family, the founder of a powerful nation, of a rough, wild, and untractable disposition. Nor was this all: ambitious of supreme au- thority, he loved to place himself at the head of his rising community, to regulate its affairs, and direct its operations ; and, like the high-spirited leader of the onagers, he could brook no rival. He discovered his ruling passion, when he was but a stripling in the house of his father. Determined to maintain his prerogatives as the elder son, and provoked to see a younger, and a child of a different mother, preferred before' him, he gave vent to his indignation, by deriding his brother, and the feast which was made on his account. Expelled for his imprudence from his father's house, he made choice of the sandy desert for his permanent resi- dence, and required the tieads of all the families around him, either to acknowledge his supremacy, and treat him with the highest respect, or be driven from his station and neighbourhood. Wherever he pitched his tent, he expect- ed, according to a custom of great antiquity, all the tents to be turned with their faces towards it, in token of submission ; that the band might have their eye always upon their mas- ter's lodging, and be in readiness to assist him if he were attacked. In this manner did Ishmael dwell " in the pres- ence," — "before," Cry) or, "over against the "faces of all his brethren." But the prediction embraced also the char- acter and circumstances of his descendants. The man- ners and customs of the Arabians, except in the article of religion, have suffered almost no alteration, during the long period of three thousand years. They have occupied the same country, and followed the same mode of life, from the days of their great ancestor, down to the present times, and range the wide extent of burning sands which separate them from all the surrounding nations, as rude, and^ savage, and untractable as the wild ass himself. Claiming the barren plains of Arabia, as the patrimonial domain assigned by God to the founder of their nation, they con- sider themselves entitled to seize, and appropriate to their own use, whatever they can find there. Impatient of re- straint, and jealous of their liberty, they form no connex- ion with the neighbouring states ; they admit of little or no friendly intercourse, but live in a state of continual hostility with the rest of the world. The tent is their dwelling, and the circular camp their city; the spontane- ous produce of the soil, to which they sonietimes add a lit- tle patch of corn, furnishes them wath means of subsist- ence, amply sufficient for their moderate desires; and the liberty of ranging at pleasure their interminable wilds, fully compensates in their opinion for the want of all other accommodations. Mounted on their favourite horses, th e y scour the waste in search of plunder, with a velocity sur- passed only by the wild ass. They levy contributions on every person that happens to fall in their way ; and fre-^ quently rob their own countrymen, with as little ceiemonv as they do a stranger or an enemy; their hand is still against everv man, and every man's hand against them. But thev do not alwa5^s confine their predatory excursions to the desert. When booty is scarce at home, they make incursions into the territories of their neighbours, and hav- ing robbed the solitary traveller, or plundered the ciravaa. Chap. 18. GENESIS. 25 immediately retire into the deserts far beyond the reach of their pursuers. Their character, drawn by the pen of in- .spiration, exactly corresponds with this view of their dis- positions and conduct : " Behold, as wild asses in the de- sert, go they forth to their work, rising betimes for a prey : the wilderness yieldeth food for them and for their chil- dren." Savage and stubborn as the wild ass which inhabits the same wilderness, they go forth on the horse or the drom- edary with inconceivable swiftness in quest of their prey. Initiated in the trade of a robber from their earliest years, they know no other employment; they choose it as the bu- siness of their life, and prosecute it with unwearied activ- ity. They start before the dawn, to invade the village or the caravan ; make their attack with desperate courage, and surprising rapidity ; and, plunging instantly into the desert, escape from the vengeance of their enemies. Provoked by their continual insults, the nations of ancient and modern times have often invaded their country with powerful ar- mies, determined to extirpate, or at least to subdue them to their yoke ; but they always return baffled and disap- pointed. The savage" freebooters, disdaining every idea of submission, with invincible patience and resolution, maintained their independence ; and they have transmitted it unimpaired to the present times. In spite of all their enemies can do to restrain them, they continue to dwell in the presence of all their brethren, and to assert their right to insult and plunder every one they meet with on the bor- ders, or within the limits of their domains. — Paxton. The fate of Ishmael is here identified with that of his descendants : and the same character is common to them both. The historical evidence of the fact, the universal tradition, and constant boa.st of the Arabs themselves, their language, and the preservation for many ages of an origin- al rite, derived from him as their primogenitor, — confirm the truth of their descent from. Ishmael. The fulfilment of the^rediction is obvious. Even Gibbon, while he at- tempts^ from the exceptions which he specifies, to evade the force of the fact that the Arabs have maintained a per- petual independence, acknowledges that these exceptions are temporary and local; that the body of the nation has escaped the yoke of the most powerful monarchies ; and that " tlie arms of Sesostris and Cyrus, of Pompey and Trajan, could never achieve the conquest of Arabia." But even the exceptions which he specifies, though thev were justly stated, and though not coupled with such admissions as invalidate them, would not detract from the truth of the prophecy. The independence of the Arabs w^as proverbial in ancient as well as in modern times ; and the present existence, as a free and independent nation, of a people who derive their descent from so high antiquity, demonstrates that they had never been wholly subdued, as all the nations around them have unquestionably been ; and that they have ever dwelt in the presence of their brethren. They not only subsist unconquered to this day, but the prophesied and primitive wildness of their race, and their hostility to all, remain unsubdued and unaltered. " They are a wild people; their ho,nd is against every man, and every man's hand is against them." In the words of Gib- bon, which strikingly assinailate with those of the prophecy, they are " armed against mankind." Plundering is their profession. Their alliance is never courted, and can never be obtained ; and all that the Turks, or Persians, or any of their neighbours can stipulate for from them is a partial and purchased forbearance. Even the British, who nave established a residence in almost every country, have entered the territories of the descendants of Ishmael to accomplish only the premeditated destruction of a fort, and to retire. It cannot be alleged, with truth, that their peculiar character and manner, and its vtninterrupted per- manency, is the necessary result of the nature of their country. They have continued wild or uncivilized, and have retained their habits of hostility towards all the rest of the human race, though they possessed for three hun- dred years countries the most opposite in their nature from the mountains of Arabia. The greatest part of the tem- perate zone was included within the limits of the Arabian conquests ; and their empire extended from India to the Atlantic, and embraced a wider range of territory than ever was possessed by the Romans, those boasted rnasters of the world. The period of their conquest and dominion was sufficient, imder such circumstances, to have changed the manners of any people ; but whether in the land of 4 Shinar or in the valleys cf Spain, on the banks of the Tigris or the Tagus, in Araby the Blessed or Araby the Barren, the posterity of Ishmael have ever maintained their prophetic character : they have remained, under every change of condition, a wild people ; their hand has still been against every man, and every man's hand against them. The natural reflection of a recent traveller, on examining the peculiarities of an Arab tribe, of which he was an eyewitness, may suflice, without any art of con- troversy, for the illustration of this prophecy : — " On the smallest computation, such must have beerf tlie manners ot those people for more than three thousand years: thus in all things verifying the prediction given of Ishmael at his birth, that he, in his posterity, should be a wild man, and always continue to be so, though they shall dwell for ever in the presence of their brethren. And that an acute and active people, surrounded for ages by polished and luxu- riant nations, should, from their earliest to their latest times, be still found a wild people, dwelling in the presence of all their brethren, (as we may call these nations,) un- subdued and unchangeable, is, indeed, a standing miracle — one of those mysterious facts which establish the truth ol prophecy," {Sir Robert K. Porter.') — Keith. Ver. 14. Wherefore the well was called Beer- lahai-roi : behold, it is between Kadcsh and Bered. • If in some places where there are wells, there are no conveniences to draw any water with, to refresh the faint- ing traveller, there are other places where the wells are furnished with troughs, and other contrivances, for the watering cattle that want to drink. Sir John Chardin tells us there are wells in Persia and in Arabia, in the driest places, and above all in the Indies, with troughs and basins of stone by the side of them. He supposes the well called Beer-lahai-roi, mentioned Gen. xvi. 14, was thus furnished, I do not remember any circumstance mentioned in that part of the patriarchal history that proves this ; but it is suffi- ciently apparent there, that the well where Rebecca went to draw water, near the city of Nahor, had some convenience of this kind ; as also had the Arabian well to which the daughters of Jethro resorted. Other wxlls, without doubt, had the like conveniences, though not distinctly mentioned, — Harmeh. Chap. 18. ver. 1. And the Lord appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre : and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day. In the time of Chandler it was still the custom of eastern shepherds to sit at the door of their tents in the heat of the day. That traveller, " at ten minutes after ten in the morning," was entertained with the view of a plain full of booths, with the Turcomans sitting by their doors, under sheds resembling poriicoes, or by shady trees, surrounded w^ith flocks of goats. In the same situation the three angels found Abraham, when they came to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, sitting under the portico, or skirts of his tent, near the door, to enjoy the refreshing breeze, and superin- tend his servants. It was not the hottest part of the day, when Chandler saw the Turcoman shepherds sitting at the doors of their booths; it was soon after ten in the morning; and when Abraham was sitting at his tent door, it might be nearly at the same hour. In the hottest part of the day, according to the practice of those countries, the patriarch had been retired to rest. The goats of the Tur- comans were feeding around their huts; and if Abraham's cattle, which is extremely probable, were feeding around his tent in the same manner, it accounts for the expedition with which he ran and fetched a calf from the herd, in order tc entertain his visitants. — Paxton. Often has my mind reverted to the scene of the good ol(jI patriarch sitting in the door of his tent in the- heat of the day. When the sun is at the meridian, the wind often becomes softer, and the heat nv)re oppressive ; and then may be seen the people seated in the doors of their huts, to inhale the breezes, and to let them blow on their almost naked bodies. — Roberts. Ver. 2. And he lifted up his eyes, and looked. To lift up the eyes does not mean to look vpu-ard, but »6 GENESIS, Chap. IQ, to look directly at an object, and that earnestly. A man coming from the jungle might say, " As I came ihis morn- ing, I lifted up my eyes, and behold, I saw three elephants." " Have you seen any thing to-day in your travels 1" — " I have not lifted up my eyes." " I do not see the thing you sent me for, sir. — "Just lift up your eyes, and you will soon find it." — Roberts. Ver. 4. Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet. How often, in passing through a village, may we see this grateful otRce performed for the weary traveller ! As the people neither wear shoes nor stockings, and as the sandal is principally for the defence of the sole of the foot, the upper part soon becomes dirty. Under these circumstances, to have the feet and ankles washed is very refreshing, and is considered a necessary part of Eastern hospitality. The service is always performed by servants. (John xiii. 14.) — Roberts. Ver. 6. And Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said. Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth. 7. And Abraham ran unto the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good, and gave it unto a young man ; and he hasted to dress it. 8. And he took butter and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them ; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat. In the cities and villages of Barbary, where public ovens are established, the bread is usually leavened , but among the Bedoweens and Kabyles, as soon as the dough is kneaded,' it is made into thin cakes, either to be baked im- mediately upon the coals, or else in a shallow earthen ves- sel like a fryingpan, called Tajen. Such were the un- leavened cakes^ which we so frequently read of in Scrip- ture, and those also which Sarah made quickly upon the hearth. These last are about an inch thick; and being commonly prepared in woody countries, are used all along the shores of the Black Sea, from the Palus-Moeotis to the Caspian, inChaldea and in Mesopotamia, except in lowns. A fire is made in the middle of the room ; and when the bread is ready for baking, a corner of the hearth is swept, the bread is laid upon it, and covered with ashes and em- bers: in a quarter of an hour they turn it. Sometimes they use small convex plates of iron : which are most com- mon in Persia, and among the nomadic tribes, as being the easiest way of baking, and done with the least ex- pense ; for the bread is extremely thin, and soon prepared. The oven is used in every part of Asia; it is made in the ground, four or five feet deep, and three in diameter, well plastered with mortar. When it is hot, they place the bread (Avhich is commonly long, and not thicker than a finger) against the sides ; it is baked in a moment. Ovens, Chardin apprehends, were not used in Canaan in the pa- triarchal age ; all the bread of that time was baked upon a plate, or under the ashes; and he supposes, what is nearly self-evident, that the cakes which Sarah baked on the hearth, were of the last sort, and that the shew-bread was of the same kind. The Arabs about mount Carmel use a great stone pitcher, in which they kindle a fire ; and when it is heated, they mix meal and water, which they apply with the hollow of their hands to the outside of the pitciier ; and this extremely soft paste, spreading itself, is baked in an instant. The heat of the pitcher having dried up all the moisture, the bread comes off as thin as our wa- fers ; and the operation is so speedily performed, that in a very little time a sufficient quantity is made. But their best sort of bread they bake, either by heating an oven, or a large pitcher half full of little smooth shining flints, upon which they lay the.dough, spread out in the form of a thin broad cake. Sometimes they use a shallow earthen vessel, resembling a fryingpan, which seems to be the pan mentioned by Moses, in which the meat-offering was naked. This vessel. Dr. Shaw informs us, serves both for haking and frying ; for the bagreah of the people of Bar- ' ary differs not much from our pancakes, only, instead of rubbing the pan in Wiiich they fry them with butier, they rub it wiih soap,, to make them like a honeycomb. If these accounts of the Arab stone pitcher, the pan, and the iron hearth or copper plate, be attended to, it will not be difficult to understand the laws of Moses in the second chapter of Leviticus ; they will be found to answer per- fectly well to the description which he gives us of the dif- ferent ways of preparing the meat-offerings. The pre- cepts of Moses evidently bear a particular relation to the methods of preparing bread, used by those who live in tents, although they were sufficient for the direction of his people after their settlement in Canaan; and his mention- ing cakes of bread baked in the oven, and wafers that were baked on the outside of these pitchers, in the fourth verse, with bread baked on a plate, and in a pan, in the fifth and seventh verses, inclines Mr. Harmer to think, the people of Israel prepared their meat-offerings in their tents, which they afterward presented at the national altar, ra- ther than in the court of the tabernacle. — Paxton. While we were talking of the Turcomans, who had ' alarmed us on our way, a meal was preparing within; and soon afterward, warm cakes baked en the hearth, cream, honey, dried raisins, butter, lebben, and wheat boiled in milk, were served to the company. Neither the Sheikh himself nor any of his family partook with us, but stood around, to wait upon their guests, though among those who sat down to eat, were two Indian fakirs, or beg- gars, a Christian pilgrim from Jerusalem, and the slaves and servants of Hadjee Abd-el-Rakhman, all dipping their fingers into the same dish. Coffee was served to us in gilded china cups, and silver stands or finjans, and the pipes of the Sheikh and his son were filled and offered to those who had none. If there could be traced a resem- blance between the form of this tent, and that of the most ancient buildings of which we have any knowledge, our reception there no less exactly corresponiied to the picture of the most ancient manners, of which we have any detail. When the three angels are said to have appeared (o Abra- ham in the plains of Mamre, he is represented as sitting in the tent-door in the heat of the day. " And wVien he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent-door, and bowed himself towards the ground." " And Abraham hastened into the tent, unto Sarah, and said, ' Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth.' And he took butter and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them, and. he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat." When inquiry was made after his wife, he replied, " Behold, she is in the tent." And when it was promised him, that Sarah should have a son, it is said, " And Sarah heard in the tent-door, which was behind him." The angels are repre- sented, as merely passengers in their journey, like our- selves : for the rites of hospitality were shown to them, before they had made their mission known. At first sight they were desired to halt and repose, to wash their feet, as they had apparently walked, and rest beneath the tree, while bread should be brought them to comfort their hearts. "And after that," said the good old patriarch, "shall ye pass on, for therefore are ye come unto your servant ;" so that the duty of hospitality to strangers seems to have been as well and as mutually understood in the earliest days, as it is in the same country at present. The form of Abraham's tent, as thus described, seems to have been exactly like the one in which we sit; for in both, there -w as ashaded open front, in which he could sit in the heat of the day, and yet be seen from afar ofl^; and the apartment of the females, where Sarah was, when he stated er to be within the tent, was immediately behind this, w erein she prepared the meal for the guests, and' from ^\ lence she listened to their prophetic declaration. — Buckingham. Chap. 19. ver. 19. Behold now, thy servant hath found grace in thy sight. Nothing can be more common than this form of speech. Has a man been jjleading with another and succeeded in his request, he will sav, " Ah ! since I have found favour in your sight, let me mention another thing." " My lord, had I not found Yavour in your sight, who would have helped me ?" " Happy is the man who fmds grace in your \ sight ["—Roberts. CiiAi'. 21. GENESIS, 27 Ver. 24. Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven. 25, And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabit- ants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground. With regard to the agents employed in this catastrophe, there might seem reason to suppose that volcanic phe- nomena had some share in producing it ; but Chateau- briand's remark is deserving of attention, " I cannot," he says, " coincide in opinion with those who suppose the Dead Sea to be the crater of a volcano. I have seen Vesuvius, Solfatara, Monte Nuovo in the lake of Fusino, the peak of the Azores, the Mamalif opposite to Carthage, the extinguished volcanoes of Auvergne ; and remarked in all of them the same characters ; that is to say, moim- tains excavated in the form of a tunnel, lava, and ashes, which exhibited incontestible proofs of the agency of fire." After noticing the very diiferent shape and position of the Dead Sea, he adds: " Bitumen, warm springs, and phos-" phoric stones, are found, it is true, in the mountains of Arabia ; but then, the presence of hot springs, sulphur, and asphaltos, is not suificient to attest the anterior existence of a volcano." The learned Frenchman inclines to adopt the idea of Professors Michaelis and Biisching, that Sod- om and Gomorrah were built upon a mine of bitumen ; that lightning kindled the combustible mass, and that the cities sank in the subterraneous conflagration. M. Malte Brun ingeniously suggests, that the cities might themselves have been built of bituminous stones, and thus have been set in flames by the fire of heaven. We learn from the Mosaic account, that the Vale of Siddim, which is now occupied by the Dead Sea, was full of " slime-pits," or pits of bitu- men. Pococke says : " It is observed, that the bitumen floats on the water, and comes ashore after windy weather ; the Arabs gather it up, and it serves as pitch for all uses, goes into the composition of medicines, and is thought to have been a very great ingredient in the bitumen used in embalming the bodies in Egypt : it has been much used for cerecloths, and has an ill smell when burnt. It is prob- able that there are subterraneous fires that throw up this bitumen at the bottom of the sea, where it may form itself into a mass, which may be broken by the motion of the water occasioned by high winds ; and it is very remarkable, that the stone called the stone of Moses, found about two or three leagues from the sea, which burns like a coal, and turns only to a white stone, and not to ashes, has the same smell, when burnt, as this pitch ; so that it is probable, a stratum of the stone under the Dead Sea is one part of the matter that feeds the subterraneous fires, and that this bitumen boils up out of it." To give force to this last con- jecture, however, it would be requisite to ascertain, whe- ther bitumen is capable of being detached from this stone, in a liquid state, by the action of fire. The stone in ques- tion is the black fetid limestone, used at Jerusalem in the manufacture of rosaries and amulets, and worn as a charm against the plague. The effluvia which it emits on friction, is owing to a strong imprfegnation of sulphureted hydro- gen. If the buildings were constructed of materials of this description, with quarries of which the neighbouring moim- tains abound, they would be easily susceptible of ignition by lightning. The scriptural account, however, is ex- plicit, that "the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Go- morrah brimstone and fire from heaven;" which Ave may safely interprei as implying a shower of inflamed sulphur, or nitre. At tue same time it is evident, that the whole plain underw it a simultaneous convulsion, which seems reterible to the consequences of a bituminous ex ^losion. In perfect accordance with this view of the cata.-trophe, we find the very materials, as it were, of this awful vis- itation still at hand in the neighbouring hills; from which they might have been poured down by the agency of a thunder-storm, without excluding a supernatural cause from the explanation of the phenomena. Captains Irby and Mangles collected on the southern coast lumps of nitre and fine sulphur, from the size of a nutmeg up to that of a small hen's egg, which, it was evident from their situation, had been brought down by the rain: their great deposite must be sought for," they say, " in the cliff"." Dr. Shaw supposes that the bitumen, as it rises, is accompanied with sulphur, " inasmuch as both of them are found pro- miscuously upon the wash of the shore." But his conjec- ture is not founded on observation. The statement he gives, is founded on hearsay evidence ; we cannot, there- fore, admit him as (in this case) an original authority, " I was informed," he says, " that the bitumen, for which this lake hath been always remarkable, is raised, at certain times, from the bottom, in large liemispheres ; which, as soon as they touch the surface, and so are acted upon by the external air, burst at once with great smoke and noise, like the pulvis fulminans of the chymists, and disperse themselves round about in a thousand pieces. But this happens only near the shore ; for, in greater depths, the eruptions are supposed to discover themselves onl)^ in such columns of smoke as are now and then observed to arise from the lake." Chateaubriand speaks of the puffs of smoke " which announce or follow the emersion of asphal- tos, and of fogs that are really unwholesome like all other fogs." These he considers' as the supposed pestilential vapours said to arise from the bosom of the lake. But it admits of question, in the deficiency of more specific infor- mation, whether what has been taken for columns of smoke, may not be the effect of evaporation, — Modern Traveller. Ver. 26, But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt. " From behind him." This seems to imply that she was following her husband, as is the custom at this day. When men, or women, leave their house, they never look back, as " it would be very unfortunate." Should a husband have left any thing which his wife knows he will require, she will not call on him to turn or look back; but Avill either take the article herself, or send it by another. Should a man have to look back on some great emergency, he will : not then proceed on the business he was about to transact. When a person goes along the road, (especially in tht evening,) he will take great care not to look back, "because the evil spirits would assuredly seize him." When they go on a journey, they will not look behind, though the palankeen, or bandy, should be close upon them ; they step a little on one side, and then look at you. Should a person have to leave the house of a friend after sunset, he will be advised in going home not to look back: " as much as pos- sible keep your eyes closed ; fear not." Has a person made an offering to the evil spirits, he must take particular care when he leaves the place not to look back. A female known to me is believed to have got her crooked neck by looking back. Such observations as the following may be often heard in private conversation. "Have you heard that Comdran is very ill i"— " No, what is the matter with him V — " Matter ! why he has looked back, and the evil spirit has caught him." — Roberts. Chap. 21. ver. 6. And Sarah said, God hath made me to laugh, so that all that hear will laugh with me. A Avoman advanced in years, under the same circum- stances, would make a similar observation : " I am made to laugh." But this figure of speech is also used on any wonderful occasion. Has a man gained any thing he did not expect, he will ask, " AVhat is this ? I am made to laugh." Has a person lost any thing which the moment before he had in his hand, he says, " I am made to laugh." Has he obtained health, or honour, or wealth, or a wife, or a child, it is said, " He is made to laugh." " Ah, his mouth is now full of laughter ; his mouth cannot contain all that laughter." (Ps. cxxivi. 2.) — Roberts. Ver. 8. And the child grew, and was weaned : and Abraham made a great feast the same day that Isaac was weaned. When the time has come to wean a child, a fortunate day is looked for, and the event is accompanied with feast- ing and religious ceremonies. Rice is given to the child in a formal way, and the relations are invited to join in i)ie festivities. For almost every event of life the Hindoo? have a fixed rule from which they seldom deviate. They wean a female child within the year, " because, if they dil? not, it would become steril ;" but boys are often allowed the breast till they are three years of age,— Roberts GENESIS. Chap. 21, Ver. 9. And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had borne unto Abraham. It is not uncommon for a man of property to keep a con- cubine in the same house with his wife ; and, strange as it may appear, it is sometimes at the wife's request* Per- haps she has not had any children, or they may have died, and they both wish to have one, to perform their funeral ceremonies. By the laws of Menu, should a wife, during the first eight years of her marriage, prove unfruitful ; or should the children she has borne be all dead in the tenth year after marriage ; or should she have a daughter onhj in the eleventh year ; he may, without her consent, put her away, and take a concubine into the house. He must, however, continue to support her. — Roberts. Ver. 14. And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, (putting it on her shoulder,) and the child, and sent her away ; and she departed, and wandered in the wilder- ness of Beer-sheba. 15. And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. 16. And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bow-shot ; for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lifted up her voice, and wept. Chardin has given us, at large, an amusing account of these bottles, which, therefore, I would here set down. After observing that the bottle given to Hagar was a lea- ther one, he goes on thus: " The Arabs, and all those that lead a wandering kind of life, keep their water, milk, and other kind of liquors in these bottles. They keep in them more fresh than otherwise they would do. These lea- ther bottles are made of goat skins. When the animal is killed, they cut off its feet and its head, and they draw it in this manner out of the skin, without opening its belly. They afterward sew up the places where the legs were cut off, and the tail, and when it is filled, they tie it about the neck. These nations, and the country people of Per- sia, never go a journey without a small leather bottle of water hanging by their side like a scrip. The great leather bottles are made of the skin of a he-goat, and the small ones, that serve instead of a bottle of water on the road, are made of a kid's skin. Mons. Dandilly, for want of ob- serving this, in his beautiful translation of Josephus, has put goat skin in the chapter of Hagar and Ishmael, instead of a kid's skin bottle, which, for the reasons assigned above, must have been meant." He reassumes the subject in ano- ther part of the same volume, in which he tells us, "that they put into these goat-skin and kid-skin vessels every thing which they want to carry to a distance in the East, whether dry or liquid, and very rarely make use of boxes and pots, unless it be to preserve such things as are lia- ble to be broken. The reason is, their making use of beasts of carriage for conveying these things, who often fall down under their loading, or throw it down, and also because it is in pretty thin woollen sacks that they enclose v/hat they carry. There is another advantage, too, in put- ting the necessaries of life in these skin vessels, they are preserved fresher ; the ants and other insects cannot make their way to them ; nor can the dust get m, of which there are such quantities in the hot countries of Asia, and so fine, that there is no such thing as a coffer impenetrable to it ; therefore it is that butter, honey, cheese, and other like aliments, are enclosed in vessels made of the skins of this species of animals." According to this, the things that were carried to Joseph for a present, were probably en- closed in little vessels made of kid skins ; not only the balm and the honey, which were somewhat liquid ; biit the nuts and the almonds too, that they might be preserved fresh, and the whole put into slight woollen sacks. — Harmer. That Ishmael should, when just ready to faint, and un- able to proceed onward in his journey, desire to lie down • I knew a couple witli whom this occurred, and the wife deli removed the covering, and then having drawn a sufficient quantity of water, they replaced the stone immediately. The extreme scarcity of water in these arid regions, en- tirely justifies such vigilant and parsimonious care in the management of this precious fluid ; and accounts for the fierce contentions about the possession of a well, which so frequently happened between the shepherds of different Chap. 29. GENESIS. 35 masters. But after the question of right, or of possession, was decided, it would seem the shepherds were often de- tected in fraudulently watering their flocks and herds from their neighbour's well. To prevent this, they se- cured the cover with a lock, which continued in use so late as the davs of Chardin, who frequently saw such pre- cautions used" in different parts of Asia, on account of the real scarcity of water there.. According to that intelli- gent traveller, when the wells and cisterns were not locked up, some person was so far the proprietor, that no one dared to open a well, or a cistern, but in his presence. This was probably the reason, that the shepherds of Pa- dan aram declined the invitation of Jacob to water the flocks, before they were all assembled; either they had not the key of the lock which secured the stone, or if they had. they durst not open it, but in the presence of Rachel, to whose father the well belonged. It is ridiculous to sup- pose the stone was so heavy that the united strength of several Mesopotamian shepherds could not roll it from the mouth of the well, when Jacob had strength, or address, to remove it alone; or, that though a stranger, he ventured to break a standing rule for watering the flocks, which the natives did not dare to do, and that without opposition. The oriental shepherds were not on other occasions so passive; as the violent conduct of the men of Gerar sufli- ciently proves. — Paxton. Ver. 7. And he said, Lo, it is yet high day. Heb. " Yet the day is great." Are people travelling through places where are wild beasts, those who are timid will keep troubling the party by saying, " Let us seek for a place of safety :" but the others reply, " Not yet ;" for " the day is great." " Why should I be in such haste 1 the day is yet great." When tired of working, it is remarked, " Why, the day is yet great." — " Yes, yes, you manage to leav^e ofi" while the day is yet great." — Roberts. Ver. 10. And it came to pass, when Jacob saw Rachel, the daughter of Laban his mother's brother, and the sheep of Laban his mother's brother, that Jacob went near, and rolled the stone from the well's mouth, and watered the flock of Laban his mother's brother. Twice in the day they led their flocks to the wells ; at noon, and when the sun was going down. To water the flocks, was an operation of much labour, and occupied a considerable space of time. It was, therefore, an office of great kindness with which Jacob introduced himself to the notice of his relations, to roll back the stone which lay upon the mouth of the well, and draw water for the flocks which Rachel tended. Some of these wells are furnished with troughs and flights of steps down to the water, and other contrivances, to facilitate the labour of watering the cattle. It is evident the Avell to which Rebecca went to draw water, near the city of Nahor, had some convenience of this kind; for it is "written, "Rebecca hastened and emptied her pitcher into the trough, and ran again unto the well to draw water, and drew for all his camels." A trough was also placed by the Avell, from which the daugh- ters of Jethro watered his flocks ; and if we may judge from circumstances, was a usual contrivance in every part of the east. In modern times, Mr. Park found a trough near the well, from which the Moors watered their cattle, in the sandy deserts of Sahara. As the wells are often very deep, from a hundred and sixty to a hundred and j seventy feet, the water is drawn up "with small leathern buckets, and a cord, which travellers are often obliged to I carry along with them, in their journey, because they j meet with more cisterns and wells than springs. Dr. I Richardson saw one of these buckets lying beside a deep I well near a Christian church in Egjrpt to draw v/ater for "1 the congregation. And Buckingham found a party of 'i twelve or fifteen Arabs drawing water in leathern buckets i by cords and pulleys. To this custom, which they are ' forced to submit to by the scantiness of the populatibn in those regions, the woman of Samaria refers m her answer to our Lord : " Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with ;" thou hast no bucket and cord, as travellers commonly have ; J "and the well is deep; from whence then hast thou that living water 1" — P.^xton. Ver. 18. And Jacob loved Rachel; and said, I will serve thee seven years for Rachel thy younger daughter. Because he had no money or other goods which he could give to the father for" his daughter. For among many people of the East, in ancient and modern times, we find "it customary, not for the bride to bring a dowry to the bridegroom, but the bridegroom must, in a manner, pur- chase the girl whom he intends to marry, from the father. Therefore Shechem says, (ch. xxxiv. 12,) to Dinah's father and brothers, " Ask me never so much dowry and gift, and I will give according as ye .shall say unto me : but give me the damsel to wife." In the same manner Tacitus relates, that among the ancient Germans, the wife did not bring the dowry to the man, but the man to the woman. " The parents and relations are present, who examine the gifts, and choose, not such as are adapted to female dress, or to adorn the bride, but oxen, and a harnessed horse, a shield, and a sword. In return for these presents he receives the wife." This custom still prevails among the Bedouins. " When a young man meets with a girl to his taste, he asks her of her father through one of his relations : they now treat about the number of camels, sheep, or horses, that the son-in-law will give to the father for his daughter; for the Bedouins never save any money, and their wealth consists only in cattle. A man that marries must therefore literally purchase his wife, and the fathers are most fortu- nate who have many daughters. They are the principal riches of the family. When, therefore, a young man negotiates with the father whose daughter he intends to marry, he says, ' Will you give me your daughter for fifty sheep, six camels, or twelve cows'?' If he is not rich enough to give so much, he offers a mare or foal. The qualilies of the girl, the family, and the fortune of him that intends to marry her, are the principal considerations in making the bargain." {Cvstoms of the Bedouin Arabs, by D'Arvieux, p. 119.) This is confirmed by Seetzen, in hi"s account of the Arab tribes whom he visited in 1808. The ceremonies at the marriage of a wandering Arab are remarkable ; a young Arab knows a girl who pleases him; he goes to her father, and makes his wishes known to him. The latter speaks to his daughter. " Daughter," says he, " there is one who asks you for his wife: the man is good, and it depends upon yourself if you will become his wife ; you have my consent." If the girl refuses, there is an end of the matter ; if she is contented, the father returns to his guest, and informs him of the happy intelligence. " But," he adds, " I demand the price of the girl." This consists of five camels ; but generally, by the intervention of others, a couple more are added, and those given are frequently miserable enough. — Burder. Ver. 19. And Laban said, It is better that I give her to thee, than that I should give her to another man : abide with me. So said Laban, in reference to his daughter Rachel; and so say fathers in the East, under smiZar circumstances. The whole aflfair is managed in a business-like way, without any thing like a consultation with the maiden. Her likes and dislikes are out of the question. The father understands the matter perfectly, and the mother is very knowing; therefore they manage the transaction. This system, how- ever, is the fruitful source of that general absence of do- mestic happiness which prevails there. She has, perhaps, never seen the man with whom she is to spend her days. He may be young ; he may be aged ; he may be repulsive or attractive. The whole is a lottery to her. Have the servants or others whispered to her something about the match 1 she will make her inquiries; but the result will never alter the arrangements : for though her soul abhor the thoughts of meeting him, yet it must be done.— Roberts. Ver. 23. And it came to pass, in the evening, that he took Leah his daughter, and brought her to him ; and he went in unto her. GENESIS. Chap. 29—31. This deceit of giving Leah to Jacob instead of Rachel was the more easy, because the bride was introduced veil- ed to the bridegroom. The following passage from Olea- rius ( Travels in Persia) is particularly applicable here. " If they are people of any consideration, they bring up %heir daughters, locked up in their chambers, to hide them from view, and they cannot be seen by the bridegroom till they are received in the chamber. In this manner many a one is deceived, and receives, instead of a handsome, a deformed and ugly girl, nay, instead of the daughter, some other relation, or even a maid. Also, Avhen the bridegroom has sat down, the bride is seated by his side veiled, and magnificently dressed, and that neither may see the other, a piece of red silk is drawn between them, which is held by two boys." — ROSENMULLER. Ver. 24. And Laban gave unto his daughter Leah, Zilpah his maid for z. handmaid. Chardin observes, that none but very poor people marry a daughter in the East, without giving her a female slave for a handmaid, there being no hired servants there as in Europe. So Solomon supposes they were extremely poor that had not a servant, Prov. xii. 9. — Harmer. Ver. 26. And Laban said, It must not be so done in our country, to give the younger before the first-born. The existence of this rule, and its application to practice, in those parts of the world, is confirmed by the Hindoo law, v/hich makes it criminal to give the younger daughter in marriage before the elder; or for a younger son to marry while his elder brother remains unmarried. — Paxton. It has been said, (and with much truth,) that could Alex- ander revisit India, he would find the same customs and manners that prevailed in his day. From age to age the fashions and usages are carefully and reverently adhered to. When the eldest daughter is deformed, or blind, or deaf, or dumb, then the you7igcr may be given first: but under other circumstances it would be disgraceful in the extreme. Should any one wish to alter the order of things, the answer of Laban is given. Should a father, however, have a very advantageous oflfer for a younger daughter, he will exert all his powers to get off the elder ; but until this can be accomplished, the younger will not be married. Younger brothers are sometimes married first, but even this takes place but very seldom. — Roberts. Ver. 30. And he went in also unto Rachel, and he loved also Rachel more than Leah, and served with him yet seven other years. Polygamy was productive of many evils ; and particu- larly ^ave occasion for jealousy and contention. It re- quired, indeed, the utmost exertion of prudence on the pan of the husband so to conduct himself towards his wives, as to prevent continual strife and discord. Wherever the practice obtains, the same care will always be requisite. Thus a late traveller, (Sir R. K. Porter's Travels in Per- sia, vol. ii. p. 8,) speaking of the number of wives a Per- sian keeps, says, " To preserve amity between these ladies, which had so excited my admiration, our communicative host told me, that himself, in common with all husbands, who preferred peace to passion, adhered to a certain rule, of each wife claiming, in regular rotation, the connubial attentions of her spouse : something of this kind is intima- ted in the domestic history of the ancient Jewish patriarchs, as a prevailing usage in the East, after men fell from the order of nature and of God, into the vice of polygamy." — Birder. Ver. 35. And she conceived again, and bare a son ; and she said, Now will I praise the Lord : therefore she called his name Judah, and left bearing. Marein, " She called his name Praise,"—" and left bear- ing." Heb. " stood from bearing." Scriptural names have generally a meaning. Thus, Didvmus, means a twin; Boanerges, a son of thunder ; and" Peter, a stone. The names of the Orientals have always a distinct meaning. Thus,' Ani Muttoo, the precious pearl ; Pun Amma, the golden lady; Perrya Amma, the great lady; Chinny Tamby, the little friend; Kanneyar, the gentleman for the eye. Vast numbers of their children are named after their gods. " Stood from bearing." When a mother has ceased to bear children, should a person say it is not so, others will reply, " She stood from bearing at such a time." — Roberts. Chap. 30. ver. 14. And Reuben went, in the days of wheat-harvest, and found mandrakes in the field, and brought them unto his mother Leah. Then Rachel said to Leah, Give me, I pray thee, of thy son's mandrakes. This plant is a species of melon, of which there are two sorts, the male and the female. The female mandrake is black, and puts out leaves resembling lettuce, though smaller and narrower, which spread on the ground, and have a disagreeable scent. It bears berries something like services, pale and of a strong smell, having kernels within like those of pears. It has two or three very large roots, twisted together, white within, black without, and^'covered with a thick rind. The male mandrake is called Morion, or folly, because it suspends the senses. It produces ber- ries twice as large as those of the female, of a good scent, and of a colour approaching towards saffron. Pliny says, the colour is white. Its leaves are large, white, broad, and smooth, like the leaves of the beech-tree. The root resembles that of the female, but is thicker and bigger, descending six or eight feet into the ground. Both the smell and the taste are pleasant; but it stupifies those that use it, and often produces phrensy, vertigo, and lethargy, which, if timely assistance is not given, terminate in coii- vulsions and death. It is said to be a provocative, and is used in the east as filters. The Orientals cultivate this plant in their gardens, for the sake of its smell ; but those which Reuben found were in the field, in some small copse of woo4 perhaps, or shade, where they had come to maturity before they were found. If they resemble those of Persia rather than those of Eg\'pt, which are of a ver} inferior quality, then we see their value, their superiority, and perhaps their rarity, which induced Rachel to pm chase them from the son of Leah.— Paxton. Ver. 20. And Leah said, God hath endowed me with a good dowry; now will my husband dwell with me, because I have borne him six sons. Should it be reported of a husband, that he is going to forsake his wife, after she has borne him children, people will say, " She has borne him so^is ; he will never, never leave her." To have children is a powerful tie upon a husband. Should she, however, not have any, he is almost certain to forsake her. — Roberts. Ver. 30. And the Lord hath blessed thee since my coming. Heb. " at my foot." By the labour of Jacob's foot, the cattle of Laban had increased to a multitude. Of a man who has become rich by his own industry, it is said, "Ah! by the labour ofhis feet these treasures have been acquired." " How have you gained this prosperitv V " Bv the favour of the gods, and the labour of my feet." " How is it the king is so prosperous V " By the labour of the feet of his ministers.— Roberts. Chap. 31. ver. 2. And Jacob beheld the counte- nance of Laban, and, behold, it was not towards him as before. Heb. " as yesterday and the dav before." See also mar- ginal reading of Isa. xxx. 33. Of old, " from yesterday. The latter form of speech is truly Oriental, and means tim gone by. Has a person lost the friendship of another, h will say to him, " Thy face is not to me as yesterday and the day before." Is a man reduced in his circumstance: he says, " The face of God is not upon me as yesterday mce^ yanM Chap. 31. GENESIS. 37 the day before.'''' The future is spoken of as to-dmj and to- morroio; " His face will be upon me to-day and to-morroioy which means, alicays. " I will love thee to-day and to-mor- row." " Do you think of me V — " Yes, to-day and to-mor- row." " Modeliar, have you heard that Tambati is trying to injure you'?" — " Yes; and go and tell him that neither tO-day nor to-morrow will he succeed." Our Saviour says, " Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to-day and to- morrow." A messenger came to inform him Herod M'ould kill him; but this was his reply, intimating that the power could never be taken from him. Jacob said to Laban, " My righteousness answers for me in time to come ;" but the Hebrew has for this, " to-morrow;" his righteousness would be perpetual. In Eastern language, therefore, "yesterday and the day before" signify time past ; but " to-day and to- morrow" time to conie. (See Ex. xiii. 14. Jos, iv. 6., also xxii. 24. margin.) — Roberts. Ver. 4. And Jacob sent and called Rachel and Leah to the field unto his flock. Besides those that live wholly in tents, numbers of the Eastern people spend part of the year in them. I have ob- served it particularly in the accounts of Mesopotamia. In that country Bishop Pococke tells us, he fell in with a sum- mer village of country people, whose huts were made of loose stones covered with reeds and boughs ; their winter village being on the side of a hill at some distance, consist- ing of very low houses ; and that they chose this place for the convenience of being with their cattle, and out of the high road. Five pages after, he observes, that many of the Curdeens live honestly in Mesopotamia as well as Syria, removing in summer to some places at a distance from their village, where they live under tents, generally in places retired from the road, to avoid the injuries of the soldiery, and of the people of the pacha. May not this circumstance serve to explain a passage of the Old Testa- ment, relating to this country 1 In Gen. xxxi. it is said, that Jacob sent and called Rachel and Leah to his flock, that he there told them of his design of returning from Mesopotamia to his native country, and that upon their consenting to go with him, he set out upon this journey so silently, that Laban had no notice of it, until the third day alter ; yet it appears; that he had all his effects with him, and tents for the accommodation of his family ; and that Laban, who pursued him, had tents also for his company. Here one is surprised to find both parties so suddenly equipped with tents for their accommodation in travelling, and is naturally led to inquire, why Jacob sent for his wives to his flock 1 Bishop Patrick's account of the last circumstance, that it was for greater secrecy, and perhaps to avoid the danger of being seized upon by Laban and his sons, will hardly be thought satisfactory. Could not a husband speak to his wives with suflicient privacy in La- ban's house 1 Were matters come to such an extremity, that Jacob durst not venture himself within the doors of his uncle's house, for fear of being seized upon, and made a prisoner '? And in fact Jacob seems actually to have com- municated his intention to Rachel in her father's house : for when he sent for his wives, she brought her father's teraphim with her, which she would by no means have I done, had she been unapprized of the design. The case seems to have been thus. While Laban and his daughters dwelt in a house, they that tended the flocks had tents for their accommodation. Laban's flocks were in two parcels, one under the care of Jacob, the other committed to the care of Laban's sons, three days' journey off; Jacob's own afterward were also, for the same reason, probably at an equal distance. At the time of shearing sheep, it is rea- sonable to suppose, that more and better tents were erected for the reception and entertainment of their friends, it be- ing a time of great feasting, 1 Sam. xxv. 4, 8, 36 ; to which they were wont to invite their friends, 2 Sam. xiii. 25 ; and the feasts being held at a distance from their own houses, in the places where the sheep were fed, as appears from the passage last cited, and also from Gen. xxxviii. 12. Laban i went then with his relations at the time of sheep-shearing ' to his flocks ; Jacob at the same time shore his own sheep, and sent to his wives to come to the entertainment, with all those utensils that they had with them of his, which would , be wanted, having before communicated his intention to Rachel his beloved wife. This w^s a fair pretence for the having all his household stuff brought to him, which, according to the present Eastern mode, we may believe was very portable, beds not excepted ; and having told Leah then his views, in the company of Rachel, and both consenting to go with him, he had every thing ready for his journey, and could decamp immediately, taking his flocks and herds along with him. Somebody, upon this, went to inform Laban of Jacob's departure, who being at a considerable distance, did not receive the news till the third day. This accounts at once, in the most simple and natural way, for Jacob's sending for his wives to his flock ; for his being able to get his goods together without jeal- ousy ; and for his and his father-in-law's being furnished witt tents for the journey. — Harmer. Ver. 7. And your father hath deceived me, and changed my wages ten times : but God suffer- ed him not to hurt me. 8. If he said thus. The speckled shall be thy wages ; then all the cattle bare speckled : and if he said thus, The ring- streaked shall be thy hire ; then bare all the cattle ring-streaked. The flocks which ranged the fertile pastures of Mesopo- tamia, seem also to have generally produced twins every year. Laban, who lived in that country, is said to have changed the wages of Jacob ten times in the space of six years ; but since the wages of Jacob consisted of the lambs and the kids, they could not have been changed more than six times in six years, if his flock had brought forth only one a-year. Should it be thought that, according to this rule, tHe wages of Jacob must have been changed twelve times, let it be remembered, that the flocks of Laban had brought forth their first lambs before the bargain was con- cluded between him and Jacob, and by consequence, the latter had only the lambs of one yeaning that year ; and again, the flocks had yeaned only once in the last year of his abode with Laban, because he was compelled to leave the service of his envious relative before the close of the season, and consequently, before the second yeaning. Thus the flocks yeaned only ten times from the date of their « agreement, till the departure of Jacob to his own country. Or, we may consider the phrase " ten times," as a definite for an indefinite number ; in which senscit is often used by the sacred writers. Thus, Jehovah complains of his an- cient people whom he had brought out of Egypt, that they had tempted him " now these ten times," that is, many times, " and had not hearkened to his voice." Job uses it in the same sense : " These ten times have ye reproached me," that is, ye have often reproached me. In the same man- ner, when Jacob complained that Laban had changed his wages ten times, he might only mean that he had done so frequently. Had we therefore no stronger proof, that the sheep of Laban yeaned twice in the year, the fact might seem to rest merely on the state of the flocks in the adjacent regions, which, it cannot be doubted, generally yeaned twins, | and for the most part twice in the year. A stronger proof, therefore, may be drawn from these words : " And it came to pass, whensoever the stronger cattle did conceive, that Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the cattle in the gut- ters, that they might conceive among the rods. But when the cattle were feeble, he put them not in ; so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's." Two yeanings are supposed to be suggested in this passage, by the terms stronger and feebler ; the lambs of the first were always stronger than those of the second : and consequently, they fell to Jacob by the special bounty of Heaven, causing the cattle, not by any law of nature, but by an act of Almighty power, to conceive among the rods, the use of which was merely the test of Jacob's faith in the divine promise. This is evident, by the sense in which the Syriac interpreter, and the Chaldee" Paraph rast understood the text ; for, instead of the term " feebler," they use the word " later," rendering the clause, "so the later were Laban's." Jerome, Aquila, and other expositors, interpret the clause in the same man- ner. Kimchi and other Jewish writers often speak of the first and second yeanings ; referring the former to the month Nisan, which corresponds to our March ; and the latter to the month Tisri, which nearly corresponds to^ September ; and they assert, that the lanibs of the first 'yeaning are called D-'-ia'p, keshorim, or bound, because they had a more 38 GENESIS. Chap. 31. compact body; and those of the second, cd::];, aeto^yhim, or deficient, "because they were feebler. The autvTmnal lambs, however, were preferred by many before the vernal, and the winter before the summer lambs, as being more vigorous and healthy. But it must be confessed, that no certain trace of two yeanings in the year can be discover- ed in the sacred volume. The fact is attested by many common authors, and seems necessary to account for the rapid increase of oriental stock, and the prodigious num- bers of which the Syrian flocks consisted. The words of M;)ses may refer, at least with equal probability, to the vig- orous and healthy constitution of the ewes which Jacob se- lected for his purpose ; and signify, that robust mothers pro- duced robust lambs, and feeble mothers a weak and spirit- less offspring. Aware of the advantages of a vigorous and healthy stock, especially with a long and perilous journey before him, " Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the stronger ewes in the gutters, that they might conceive among the rods ; but when the cattle were feeble, he put them not iu ; so the feebler were Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's." — Paxton. Ver. 27. Wherefore didst thou flee away secretly, and steal away from me, and didst not tell me, that I might have sent thee away with mirth, and with songs, and with tabret, and with harp ? The Easterns used to set out, at least on their longer jour- neys, with music. When the prefetto of Egypt was pre- paring for his journey, he complains of his being incom- moded by the songs of his friends, who in this manner took leave of their relations and acquaintance. These valedic- tory songs were often extemporary. If we consider them, as they probably were used not on common but more sol- emn occasions, there appears peculiar propriety in the com- plaint of Laban. — Harmer, Ver. 34. Now Rachel had taken the images, and put them in the camel's furniture, and sat upon them. And Laban searched all the tent, but found them not. Mounted on this mild and persevering animal, (the camel,) the traveller pursues his journey over the sandy deserts of the east, with speed and safety. For his con- venience, a sort of round basket is slung on each side with a cover, which holds all his necessaries, between which he is seated on the back of the animal. Sometimes two long chairs, like cradles, are hung on each side with a covering, in which he sits, or, stretched at his ease, re- signs himself to sleep, without interrupting his journey. These covered baskets, or chairs, are the camel's furni- ture, where Rachel put the images which she stole from her father, — Paxton. Yer. 35. And she said to her father. Let it not displease my lord that I cannot rise up before thee ; for the custom of women is upon me. And he searched, but found not the images. In Persia, a son never sits in the presence of his father or his mother ; even the king's son always stands before him; and is regarded only as the first of his servants. This is the reason that Rachel addressed her father in these words : " Let it not displease my lord, that I cannot rise up before thee." — Paxton, Ver. 38. This twenty years have I been with thee ; thy ewes and thy she-goats have not cast their young, and the rams of thy flock have I not eaten. 39. That which was torn of beasts I brought not unto thee ; I bare the loss of it : of my hand didst thou require it, whether stolen by day, or stolen by night. The shepherds of the East were accountable for the flocks under their pharge. Of this fact, the following extract from the Gentoo laws, furnishes a remarkable proof: "Cattle shall be delivered over to the cow-herd in the morning ; the cow-herd sr ^^ end them the whole day with grass and water; and in the evening, shall re-deliver them to the master, in the same manner as they were intrusted to him ; if, by the fault of the cow-herd, any of the cattle be lost or stolen, that cow-herd shall make it good. When a cow-herd has led cattle to any distant place to feed, if any die of some distemper, notwithstanding the cow-herd applied the proper remedy, the cow-herd shall carry the head, the tail, the fore-foot, or some such convincing proof taken from that animal's body, to the owner of the cattle ; having done this, he shall be no further answerable ; if he neglects to act thus, he shall make good the loss." In this very situation was Jacob with Laban, his father-in-law, as we learn from his memorable expostulation, addressed to that deceitful and envious relation. — Paxton. Ver. 40. Thus I was ; in the day the drought consumed me, and the frost by night ; %nd my sleep departed from mine eyes. See on Jeremiah 3G. 30. Does a master reprove his servant for being idle, he will ask, " What can I do 1 the heat eats me up by day, and the cold eats me up by night : how can I gain strength 1 I am like the trees of the field : the sun is on my head by day, and the dew by night." — Roberts. In the midst of the burning deserts, where the heat is increased tenfold by the sandy surface on which it beats, the traveller encounters much inconvenience, and even distress, from the chilling cold of the night, Mr. Bruce, the justly celebrated Abyssinian traveller, lost all his camels in one night by the cold, in the deserts of Senaar. In the year 1779, the Bedouin Arabs plundered an Eng- lish caravan in the desert, between Suez and Cairo. Seven of the Europeans, stripped entirely naked by their inhu- man sailers, in the hope of reaching Cairo, pushed for- ward into the desert. Fatigue, thirst, hunger, and the heat of the sun, destroyed one after another ; one alone survived all these horrors. During three days and two nights, he wandered in this parched and sandy desert, frozen at night by the north wind, (it being in the month of January,) and burnt by the sun during the day, with- out any other shade but "a single bush, into which he thrust his head among the thorns, or any drink but his own urine. At length, on the third day, he was descried by an Arab, who conducted him to his tent, and took care of him for three days, with the utmost humanity. At the expiration of that time, the merchants of Cairo, apprized of his situation, procured him a conveyance to that city, where he arrived in the most deplorable condi- tion. From these important facts we may conclude, that even in those parched countries, a fire in the night, in the middle of May, might be very requisite, and highly ac- ceptable. The hapless wanderer, whose aifectmg story Volney records, was frozen at night by the north wind, and burnt by the dreadful heat of the sun during the day; and the patriarch Jacob complains, that he was for many years exposed to similar hardships in the plains of Meso- potamia; " In the day the drought consumed me, and the frost by night," Nothing assuredly was remoter from the design of Volney, a proud and insolent enemy of revela- tion, than to confirm the truth of Scripture history; his statement clearly proves, that Jacob's complaint was not hastily made, but strictly agreeable to truth. — Paxton. Ver. 46. And Jacob said unto his brethren, Gather stones : and they took stones, and made a heap : and they did eat there upon the heap. Our version of Genesis xxxi. 46, represents Jacob as sitting, with his relations and friends, when he held a solemn feast, on a heap of stones : one would be inclined to suspect the justness of the translation, as to this circum- stance, of the manner in which he treated his friends; but it is made less incredible, by the account Niebuhr has given us, in the first volume of his travels, of the manner in which some of the nobles of the court of the Iman seated themselves, when he visited the prince at Sana of Arabia, his capital city. It is certain the particle Sj?, «/, translated in this passage iipoji, sometimes signifies near to, or some- thing of that sort ; so it is twice Tised in this sense, Gen. xvi. " And the angel of the Lord found her bif a fountain in the way to Shur." So Gen. xxiv. 13, *' Behold, I stand Chap. 32. GENESIS. 39 here by the well of water, and the daughters of the men of the city come out to draw water." The same may be ob- served in many other places of the book of Genesis. Con- sequently the sitting of Jacob and Laban, with their relations and friends, might be understood to have been only near the heap of stones, which was collected together upon this oc- casion, and designed for a memorial of present reconcilia- tion, and reciprocal engagement to preserve peace and amity in future times : but their actual sitting on this heap of stones may perhaps appear somewhat less improbable, after reading the following passage of Niebuhr's travels, relating to his being admitted to an audience of the Iman of Yemen. " I had gone from my lodgings indisposed, and by standing so long, found myself so faint, that I was obliged to ask permission to quit the room. I found near the door some of the principal officers of the court, who were sitting in a scattered manner, in the shade, upon stones, by the side, of the wall. Among them was the nakib, the general, or rather master of the horse, Gheir Allah, with whom I had some acquaintance before. He immediately resigned his place to me, and applied himself to draw together stones into a heap, in order to build him- self a new seat." This management to us appears very strange ; it might possibly be owing to the extreme heat of that time of the year in that country, which made sitting on the ground very disagreeable ; it can hardly however be supposed that they sat upon the heap of stones that had been gathered together on Mount Gilead, for this reason, since high grounds are cooler than those that lie low; since it was in spring time, when the heat is more mod- erate, for it was at the time of sheep-shearing : but it might be wet, and disagreeable sitting on the ground, especially as they were not furnished with sufficient number of carpets, pursuing after Jacob in a great hurry ; and sev- eral countries furnishing stones so flat as to be capable of being formed into a pavement, or seat, not so uneasy as we may have imagined. Mount Gilead might be such a country. It might also be thought to tend more strongly to impress the mind, when this feast of reconciliation was eaten upon that very heap that was designed to be the lasting memorial of this renewed friendship. As for the making use of heaps of stones for a memorial^ many are found to this day in these countries, and not merely by land, for they have been used for sea marks too : So Nie- buhr, in the same volume, tells us of a heap of stones placed upon a rock in the Red Sea, which was designed to warn them that sailed there of the danger of the place, that they might be upon their guard. — Harmer. Ver. 55. And early in the morning, Laban rose up, and kissed his sons and his daughters, and blessed them : and Laban departed, and return- ed unto his place. Early rising is a universal custom. Thus, in every season of the year, the people may be seen at sunrise, strolling in all directions. At the time of the heavy dews, they bind a part of the robe round the head, which also falls on the shoulders. When a journey has to be taken, were they not to rise early, they would be unable to travel far before the sun had gained "its meridian height. They therefore start a little before daylight, and rest under the shade during the heat of the day. Here also we have another instance of the interesting custom of blessing those who were about to be separated. A more pleasing scene than that of a father blessing his sons and daughters can scarcely be conceived. The fervour of the language, the expression of the countenance, and the affection of their embraces, all excite our strongest svmpathy. " My child, may God keep thy hands and thy feet !" " May the beasts of the forest keep" far from thee !" " May thy wife and thy children be preserved !" " May riches and happiness ever be thy portion !" — Roberts. Chap. 32. ver. 7. Then Jacob was greatly afraid, and distressed : and he divided the people that loas with him, and the flocks, and herds, and the camels, into two bands. This plan seems not to have been first invented by, Ja- cob; but it may be conjectured that large caravans used at that time to take this precaution against hostile attacks. Sir H. Blount relates in his Travels, that he traveU.ed with a caravan which had divided itself in like manner into two troops; one of which that went before, feeing attacked bv robbers, had an action with them, and were plundered, whereas the other escaped uninjured. — Rosenmuller. Ver. 15. Thirty milch-camels with their colts, forty kine and ten bulls, twenty she-asses and ten foals. Milch-camels, among the Arabs, constitute a principal part of their riches ; the creature being every way so ser- vicealfce, that the providence of God appears peculiarly kind and wise in providing such a beast for those countries, where no other animal could be of equal use. Niebuhr re- lates, " that among other dishes presented to him by the Arabs at Menayre, there was also camels' milk. That it was indeed considered cooling and healthy in these hot countries, but that it was so clammy, that when a finger is dipped into it, and drawn up again, the milk hangs down from it like a thread." Host, in his Account of Morocco and Fez, says, " that the Moors also drink camels' milk; and when they have milked them for a short time, they suffigr the young camels to suck, and then begin to milk again, partly to share it with the young camels, and partly to make the camels give the milk better." Pallas, in his Rus- sian Travels, says, that it is customary among the Kirgise to milk the camels : " their milk is said to be bluish, thick, and of an agreeable taste. The Kirgise consider it to be very wholesome ; and it is also said that a more intoxica- ting beverage is drawn from it than from mares' milk." In fact, the camel is of such multifarious use to the Orien- tals, and of such importance, that among the Bedouins, wealth is not estimated by money, but by the number of camels. These observations are confirmed by Seetzen, in his Account of the Arab Tribes. " No animal among the Arabs surpasses the camel in utility ; besides the whole- some diet which his flesh, his milk, and their products, afford them, they turn every part of it to account. Out of its hair, they manufacture carpets, large strong sacks for corn, &c. Out of its skin, soles (serbul,) large water bot- tles (rawijch,) two of which are a load for a camel, and large leather sacks (karpha,) in which they transport and preserve butter, corn, and similar articles ; they die them red on the outside ; and two of these also are a load for a camel. They likewise cut straps out of the skin, and out of five or six such straps .they prepare long, tough thongs, which they employ in drawing up water fnm deep wells. They also stitch the skin over a frame of bent sticks, and thus form large vessels, which they use to water the camels, and which are called Hhod. "The two sinews of the neck of the camel (aelba) serve instead of ropes, and are ex- tremely strong. Their dung is used for fuel. Even the urine of this animal is of utility : all the Arabs, Nomades of both sexes, and likewise many Arab peasants, wash the head every two or three days with the urine of the female camel, and consider this to be very healthy." — Rosenmuller. From the present which Jacob made to his brother Esau, consisting of five hundred and eighty head of different sorts, we may form some idea of the countless numbers of great and small cattle, which he had acquired in the ser- vice of Laban. In modern times, the numbers of cattle in the Turcoman flocks which feed on the fertile plains ot Syria, are almost incredible. They sometimes occupy three or four days in passing from one part of the country to another. Chardin had an opportunity of seeing a clan of Turcoman shepherds on their march, about two days' distance from Aleppo. The whole country was covered with them. Many of their principal people, with whom he conversed on the" road, assured him, that there were four hundred thousand beasts of carriage, camels, horses, oxen, cows, and asses, and three millions of sheep and goats. This astonishing account of Chardin, is confirmed by Dr. Shaw, who states that several Arabian tribes, who can bring no more than three or four hundred horses into the field, are possessed of more than so many thousand camels, and triple the number of sheep and black cattle. Russel, in his history of Aleppo, speaks of vast flocks-which pass that city every year, of wliich many sheep are sold to supply the inhabitants. The flocks jnd herds which belonged to the Jewish patriarchs, were not more numerous. — Paxton. 40 GENESIS. Chap. 32—34 Ver. 19. And so commanded he the second, and the third, and all that followed the droves, say- ing, On tUis manner shall ye speak unto Esau, when ye find him. I almost think I hear Jacob telling his servants what they were to say to Esau. He would repeat it many times over, and then ask, " What did I say 7" until he had com- pletely schooled them into the story. They would be most attentive ; and at every interval, some of the most officious would be repeating the tale. The head servant, however, Would be specially charged with the delivery of the mes- sage. When they went into the presence of Esagi, they would be very particular in placing much stress on Jacob's saying, " the present is sent unto my lord I'' and this would touch his feelings. Servants who see the earnestness of their master, imitate him in this when they stand before the person to whom they are sent. They repeat a number of little things respecting him ; his great sorrow for his offence, his weeping, his throwing himself into the dust, and his fearful expressions. Should the occasion, how- ever, be of a pleasing nature, they mention his great joy, and his anxiety for an interview. The dependants of Esau, also, would hear the story, and every now and then be making exclamations at the humility of Jacob, and the value of his present. They would also put their hands together in a supplicating posture, for Esau to attend to the request. He, feeling himself thus acknowledged as lord, seeing the servants of his brother before him, and knowing that all his people had witnessed the scene, would consider himself greatly honoured. In this Avay many a culprit in the East gains a pardon, when nothing else could purchase it. Should the offender be too poor to send a present, he simply despatches his wife and children to plead for him ; and they seldom plead in vain. — Roberts. Chap. 33. ver. 3. And he passed over before them, and bowed himself to the ground seven times, until he came near to his brother. There is something very touching, and, to an Eastern mind, very natural, in this action of Jacob's. His arrange- ments, also, may be seen to the life, at this day. His wives and children were placed behind him : they would be in a separate group, in order that Esau might the more easily see them. He would then walk forward, and cast himself on the earth, and rise again, till he had bowed seven times ; after which, (as he would walk a short distance every time he arose,) he would be near to his brother. Esau could not bear it any longer, and ran to meet him, and fell on his neck, and kissed him, and wept. Then came the hand- maids and their children, (I think I see them,) and bowed themselves before Esau ; the wives, also, according to their age, and their children, prostrated themselves before him. What with the looks of the little ones, joined with those of the mothers, Esau could not help being moved. — Roberts. Ver. 10. And Jacob said, Nay, I pray thee, if now I have found grace in thy sight, then re- ceive my present at my hand. It is the custom of the East, when one invites a superior, to make him a present after the repast, as an acknowledg- ment of his trouble. Frequently it is done before it, as it is no augmentation of honour to go to the house of an in- ferior. They make no presents to equals, or those who are below themselves. — Burder. Not to receive a present, is at once to show that the thing desired will not be granted. Hence, nothing can be more repulsive, nothing more distressing, than to return the gifts to the giver. Jacob evidently laboured under this impres- sion, and therefore pressed his brother to receive the gilts, if he had found favour in his sight. — Roberts. Ver. 1 3. And he said unto him. My lord knoweth that the children are tender, and the flocks and herds with young are with me : and if men should overdrive them one day, all the flock will die. " Their flocks," says Chardin, speaking of those who now live in the East after the patriarchal manner, " feed down the places of their encampments so quick, by the great numbers which they have, that they are obliged to remove them too often, which is very destructive to their flocks, on account of the young ones, which have not strength enough to follow." — Habmer. Ver. 14. Let my lord, I pray thee, pass over be- fore his servant ; and I will lead on softly, ac- cording as the cattle that goeth before me, and the children be able to endure, until I come unto my lord unto Seir. People having taken a journey, say, " We came to tnis place according to the walking of our feet." " It was done according to the foot of the children ;" which means, they did not come in a palankeen, or any other vehicle, but on foot. From this it appears, that the females, and the children, performed their journey on foot, and that, accord- ing to their strength. — Roberts. Ver. 15. And Esau said, Let me now leave with thee some of the folk that are w^ith me. And he said. What needeth it ? let me find grace in the sight of my lord. As Esau had received valuable gifts from his brother, he wished to make some present in return ; and having received cattle, it would not have looked well to have giv- en the same kind of gift that he had received ; he therefore offered some of his people, (who were no doubt born in his house,) as a kind oi recompense for what he had received, and as a proof of his attachment. — Roberts. Ver. 19. And he bought a parcel of a field, where he had spread his tent, at the hand of the chil- dren of Hamor, Shechem's father, for a hundred pieces of money. There is very great reason to believe that the eSj" liest coins struck were used both as weights and money and indeed this circumstance is in part proved by the very names of certain of the Greek and Roman coins. Thus the Attic mhia and the Roman libra equally signify a pound ; and the ararrip {stater) of the Greeks, so called from weighing, is decisive as to this point. The Jewish shekel, was also a weight as well as a coin : three thousand she- kels, according to Arbuthnot, being equal in weight and value to one talent. This is the oldest coin of which we anywhere read, for it occurs Gen. xxiii. 16, and exhibits direct evidence against those who date the first coinage of money so low as the time of Croesus or Darius, it being there expressly said, that Abraham weighed to Ephron four hundred shekels of silver, current money with the merchant. Having considered the origin and high antiquity of coined money, we proceed to consider the stamp or impression which the first money bore. The primitive race of men being shepherds, and their wealth consisting in their cattle, in which Abraham is said to have been rich, for greater convenience metals were substituted for the commodity it- self. It was natural for the representative sign to bear im- pressed the object which it represented ; and thus accord- ingly the earliest coins were stamped with the figure of an ox or a sheep : for proof that they actually did thus impress them, we can again appeal to the high authority of scrip- ture : for there we are informed that Jacob bought a parcel of a field for a hundred pieces of moneif. The original Hebrew translated pieces of money, is kcsitoth, which sig- nifies lambs, with the figure of which the metal was doubt- less stamped. — Maurice's Indian Antiquities. Chap. 34. ver. 1. And Dinah the daughter of Leah, which she bare unto Jacob, w^ent out to see the daughters of the land. 2. And when Shechem the son of Hamor the Hivite, prince of the country, saw her, he took her, and lay with her, and defiled her. Chap. 34. GENESIS, 41 Voltaire objects, in like manner, to the probability of the Old Testament history, in the account given us there of the dishonour done to Dinah, the daughter of Jacob, by a Hivite prince in Canaan, Gen. xxxiv. 1, 2, who he sup- Eoses was too young to have suflered such an injury, or to ave excited the atiiactions of Shechem. The two following citations will prove there was nothing incredible in it, and that an ardent young Eastern prince may be sup- posed to have been guilty of such a fact. The first cita- tion shall be from Niebuhr's account of Arabia : " I have heard speak in Persia of one that was a mother at thir- teen : they there marry girls at nine years of age ; and I knew a man whose wife was no more than ten years old when the marriage was consummated." The other is from Dr. Shaw's Travels and observations. Speaking of the inhabitants of Barbary, he says, " The men, indeed, by wearing only the tiara, or a scull cap, are exposed so much to the sun, that they quickly attain the swarthiness of the Arab; but the women, keeping more at home, pre- serve their beauty until they are thirty : at which age they begin to be wrinkled, and are usually past childbearing. It sometimes happens that one of these girls is a mother at eleven, and a grandmother at two-and-twenty." If they be- come mothers at eleven, they might easily become the ob- jects of attachment at ten, or thereabouts ; and this cannot be supposed to be very extraordinary, when the daughter of such a one is supposed to become a mother too by eleven. It cannot then be incredible that Shechem should cast his eyes on Dinah at ten years of age, and should desire to marry her at that age ; if human nature in the East then was similar, in that respect, to what it is now. Bui she might be considerably older than ten when this af- fair happened, for aught that is said in the book of Genesis relative to this matter. — Harmer. Ver. 11. And Shechem said unto her father, and unto her brethren, Let me find grace in your eyes, and what ye shall say unto me I will give. 12. Ask me never so much dowry and gift, and I will give according as ye shall say tmto me : but give me the damsel to wife. In the remote ages of antiquity, women were literally purchased by their husbands ; and the presents made to their parents or other relations were called their dowry. The practice still continues in the country of Shechem ; for when a young Arab wishes to marrK-he must purchase his wife ; and for this reason, fathers, among the Arabs, are never more happy than when they have many daugh- ters. They are reckoned the principal riches of a house. An Arabian suitor will offer fifty sheep, six camels, or a dozen of cows ; if he be not rich enougn to make such of- fers, he proposes to give a mare or a colt, considering in the offer, the merit of the young woman, the rank of her family, and his own circumstances. In the primitive times of Greece, a well-educated lady was valued at four oxen. When they agree on both sides, the contract is drawn up by him that acts as cadi or judge among these Arabs. In some parts of the East, a measure of corn is formally men- tioned in contracts for their concubines, or temporary wives, besides the sum of money which is stipulated by way of dowry. This custom is probably as ancient as concubinage, with %hich it is connected ; and if so, it will perhaps account for the prophet Hosea's purchasing a wife of this kind for fifteen pieces of silver, and for a homer of barley, and a half homer of barley. — Paxton. Ver. 21. These men are peaceable with us, there- fore let them dwell in the land, and trade therein ; for the land, behold, it is large enough for them: let us take their daughters to us for wives, and let us give them our daughters. The shepherds of Syria and the East have, from the re- motest antiquity, carried on a considerable trade with the circumjacent cities. The people of Aleppo are vStill sup- plied with the greater part of their butter, their cheese, and their cattle for slaughter, by the Arabs, Kushwans, or Turcomans, who travel about the country with their flocks and herds, as did the patriarchs of old. It was un- 6 doubtedly by trading with the ancient cities of Canaan in such articles of provision, that Abraham became so rich in silver and gold. The lucrative commerce which Jacob his grandson carried on with the inhabitants of Shechem, is mentioned by Hamor their prince, and urged as a rea- son of alliance and union : " these men are peaceable with us ; therefore, let them dwell in the land, and trade there- in; for the land, behold it is large enough for them." While the wealth of the country, where they tended thei7 flocks and herds, flowed into the coffers of these shephera princes, in a steady and copious stream, their simple and frugal manner of living, required but little expense for the support of their numerous households; and their nomadic state prevented them from contracting alliances, or/orm- ing connexions of an expensive nature. Hence, in a fcAV years they amassed large quantities of the precious metals ; they multiplied their flocks and their herds, till they cov- ered the face of the country for many miles; they en- gaged a numerous train of servants from the surround- ing towns and villages, and had servants born in theii houses, of the slaves whom they had purchased, or taken prisoners in war. When Abraham heard that his brother Lot was taken captive by the king of Shinar and his confederates, he armed his trained servants born in his house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan. The truth Of the scripture accounts is verified by the present state of the Arabian chieftains in those very places where Abraham and his descendants formerly wan- dered. By the unimpeachable testimony of Russel, they are equally rich, and powerful, and independent, as were these renowned patriarchs ; they are surrounded with ser- vants and retainers, equally numerous, resolute, and faith- ful ; they are, in fine, the modern patriarchs of the East. In Persia and in Turkey, where the country is full of Tur- coman shepherds, their chiefs appear with a great train of servants, richly clothed and mounted. Chardin fell in with one of these pastoral chieftains between Parthia and Hyrcania, whose train filled him at once with surprise and alarm. The Turcoman had more than ten led horses, with harness all of solid gold and silver. He was accompanied by many shepherds on horseback, and well armed. They treated the traveller civilly, and answered all the questions his curiosity prompted him to put to them, upon their manner of life. The whole country, for ten leagues, was full of their flocks. An hour after, the chieftain's wives, and those of his principal attendants, passed along in a line : four of them rode in great square baskets, carried two upon a camel, which were not close covered. The rest were on camels, on asses, and on horseback ; most of them with their faces unveiled, among whom were some very beautiful women. From this display of pastoral mag- nificence, which Chardin had an opportunity of contem- plating, we are enabled to form a very clear idea of the splendouF and elegance in which Abraham and other pa- triarchs lived; and of the beauty which the sacred histo- rian ascribes to Sarah, Rebecca, and Rachel, who had very fair complexions, — Paxton. Ver. 24. When they were sore. Circumcision in infants is easy and soon healed, and some have thought, that in adults, it was worst the third day ; but Sir John Chardin says, that he had heard from divers renegadoes in the East, who had been circumcised, some at thirty and some at forty years of age, that the cir- cumcision had occasioned them a great deal of pain, and that they were obliged to keep their bed at least twenty or twenty-two days, during which time they could not walk without feeling very severe pain ; but that they applied no- thing to the wound to make it cicatrize, except burnt paper. — BURDER. Ver. 27. The sons of Jacob came upon the slain and spoiled the city, because they had defiled their sister. Among the Bedouin Arabs, the brother finds himself more dishonoured by the seduction of his sister, than a man by the infidelity of his wife. As a reason, they allege, " that a wife is not of the family, and that they are obliged to keep a wife only as long as she is chaste ; and if she is not she may be sent away, and is no longer a member of the family; but tha*, -i sister constantly remains a mH'S:>et 42 GENESIS. Chap. 34—36, of the family ^ ind even if his sister became dissolute, and was defiled, rxbody could hinder her from still being his sister." (D'Arvieux.) This is confirmed by Niebuhr. "I learnt at Basra, that a man is not allowed to kill his wife, even on account of adultery; but that her father, brother, or any of her relations, were suiFeredto do it without being punished, or at least paying a small sum as an atonement, because her relations had been dishonoured by her bad be- haviour ; but that after this satisfaction, nobody is permitted to reproach the family. They rememlDered examples of it in Basra and Bagdad ; in this latter place, a rich merchant, a few years since, had found a young man with a relation of his, and not only hewed her in pieces on the spot, but also, by witnesses and money, caused the young man, who was the son of a respectable citizen, to be hanged the same night by the magistrates." — Rosenmuller. Ver. 30. And Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, Ye have troubled me, to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land. So said Jacob to Simeon and Levi. Of a man who has lost his honour, whose fame has entirely gone, it is said, " Ah ! he has lost his smell— where is the sweet smell of former years 1" " Alas !" says an old man, " my smell is for ever gone." — Roberts. Chap. 35. vcr. 2. Then Jacob said unto his household, and to all that were with him, Put away the strange gods that are among you, and be clean, and change your garments. * The household of Jacob had strange gods among them, and he ordered them to put them away, and to make them- selves clean, and to change their garments in token of their purity. When people have been to any unholy place, they always on returning wash their persons and change their garments. No man can go to the temple, wearing a dirty cloth : he must either put it on clean, or go himself to a tank and wash it; or put on one which is quite new. Hence, near temples, men may be seen washing their clothes, in order to prepare themselves for some ceremony. (Exodus xix. 10.)— Roberts. Ver. 4. And they gave unto Jacob all the strange gods which were in their hand, and all their ear-rings which were in their ears; and Jacob hid them under the oak which was by Shechem. The nose-jewel is another ornament peculiar to the East, which the Jewish females were accustomed to wear, and of which the Asiatic ladies are extremely fond. It is men- tioned in several parts of scripture; thus the prophet Ezekiel : " And I put a jewel on thy foreheaa," or, as ]t should have been rendered, on thy nose. This ornament was one of the presents which the servant of Abraham gave to Rebecca, in the name of his master : " I put," said he, " the ear-ring upon her face ;" more literally, I put the ring on her nose. They wore ear-rings besides ; for the household of Jacob at his request, when they were prepar- ing to go up to Bethel, gave him all the ear-rings which were in their ears, and he hid them under the oak which was by Shechem, The difference between these orna- ments is clearly stated by the prophet: " I put a jewt? on thy nose, and ear-rings in thine ears." The nose-jewel, therefore, was different from the ear-ring, and actually worn by the females as an ornament in the East. This is confirmed by the testimony of Sir John Chardin, who says, "It is the custom in almost all the East, for the women to wear rings in their noses, in the left nostril, which is bored low down in the middle. These rings are of gold, and have commonly two pearls and one ruby between them, placed in the ring ; I never saw a girl or young woman in Arabia, or in all Persia, who did not wear a ring after this man- ner in her nostril." Some writers contend, that by the nose- jewel, we are to understand rings, which women attached to their forehead, and let them fall down upon their nose ; but Chardin, who certainly was a diligent observer of East- ern customs, nowhere saw this frontal ring in the East, but everywhere the ring in the nose. His testimony is sup- ported by Dr. Russel who describes the women in some of the villages about Aleppo, and all the Arabs and Chinga- nas, (a sort of gipsies,) as wearing a large ring of silver or gold, through the external cartilage of their right nos- tril. It is worn, by the testimony of Egmont, in the same manner by the women of Egypt. The difference in the statements of these travellers is of little importance, and may be reconciled by supposing, what is not improbable, that in some eastern countries they wear the ring in the left, and in others in the right nostril ; all agree that it is worn in the nose, and not upon the forehead. Some re- mains of this custom have been discovered among the Indians in North America, where Clark and Lewis, in their travels to the sources of the Missouri, fell in with some tribes that wore a long tapering piece of shell, or bead, put through the cartilage of the nose. — Paxton. Ver. 8. But Deborah, Rebecca's nurse, died, and she was buried beneath Beth-el, under an oak : and the name of it was called Allon-bachuth. Savary, speaking of the Egyptian women, and their manner of nursing their children, says, " When circum- stances compel them to have recourse to a nurse, she is not looked upon as a stranger. She becomes pari of the family, and passes the rest of her life in the midst of the children she has suckled. She is honoured and cherished like a second mother." So the Syrian nurse continued until her death with Rebecca, and was buried with great solemnity of mourning : since that oak was from that time distinguished by the name of the Oak of Weeping. — Har- MER. Ver. 19. And Rachel died, and was buried in the way to Ephrath, which is Beth-lehem; 20. And Jacob set a pillar upon her grave : that is the pillar of RacheFs grave unto this day. Th3 following account from the recent and valuable Trarch in Palestine, by Mr. Buckingham, on the subject of Rachel's tomb, will" be found highly interesting. " In the way, on the right, at a litt> distance from the road, is hewn the reputed tomb of Racliel, to which we turned " off, to enter. This may be near the spot of Rachel's inter- ment, as it is not far from Ephrath, and may correspond well enough with the place assigned for her sepulchre by Moses, who says, in describing her death in childbirth of Benjamin, ' and Rachel died, and was buried in the way to Ephrath, which-is Bethlehem ; and Jacob set a pillar upon her grave, that is the pillar of Rachel's grave unto this day.' Gen. xxxv. 19. Instead of a pillar, the spot is now covered by a Mohammedan building, resembling in its exterior the tombs of saints and scheiks in Arabia and Egypt, being small, square, and surmounted by a dome. We entered it on the south side by an aperture, through which it was difficult to crawl, as it has no doorwav ; and found on the inside a square mass of masonry in the cen- tre, built up from the floor nearly to the roof, and of such a size as to leave barely a narrow passage for walking around it. It is plastered with white stucco on the outer surface, and is sufficiently large and high to enclose with- in It any ancient pillar that might have been found on the grave of Rachel. This central mass is certainly different from any thing that I have ever observed in Arabian tombs ; and it struck me on the spot, as by no means im- probable, that its intention might have originally been to enckse either a pillar, or fragment of one, which tradition had ])ointed out as the pillar of Rachel's grave : and that as th3 place is held in equal veneration by Jews, by Chris- tians, and by Mohammedans, the last, as lords of the coun- try, might have subsequentlv built the present structure over it in their own style, and plastered the high square pillar within. Around the interior face of the walls, is an arched recess on each side, and over every part of the stucco are written and engraved a profusion of names in Hebrew, Arabic, and Roman characters ; the first execu- ted i 1 curious d»^vices, as if a sort of abracadabra." P. 216. — Birder. {See Engraving.) Chap. 36. ver. 6. And Esau took his Avives, and his sons, and his daughters, and all the persons of his house. Chap. 36. GENESIS. 43 The Margin has, for persons, " souls." Has a man gone to a distant place, it is said, " Viravan, and all the souls of his house, have gone to the far country." " Have you heard that the old man and thirty souls have gone on a pilgrim- age V " Sir, I can never get rich, because I have fifteen souls who daily look to me for their rice." — Roberts. Ver. 24. And these are the children of Zibeon ; both Ajah, and Anah : this was that Anah that found the mules in the wilderness, as he fed the asses of Zibeon his father. The Hebrews ascribe the invention of mules to Anah, the son of Zibeon, whose daughter, Aholibamah, was given in marriage to Esau. " This was that Anah, that found the mules in the wilderness, as he fed the asses of Zibeon his father." In this text, Moses evidently censures the misguided and preposterous industry of Anah, who, not satisfied with the numerous flocks and herds which the bounty of- Providence had bestowed on his family, or, per- haps, actuated by impure and licentious motives, contrived a new and spurious breed of animals unknown to nature, and contrary to the laws which regulate her operations. Whatever might be the motive, the conduct of this Horite prince was certainly criminal. We cannot, on any other supposition, account for the peculiar and emphatical phrase which Moses employs : " This was that Anah, that found the mules in the wilderness." In opposition to this idea, Bochart contends, that if Anah had found out the method of procreating mules, the sacred historian would not have said he found them ; because the verb (ni«d) matsa, among the Hebrews, does not signify to invent, but to find some- thing already in existence. Nor to strengthen this con- jecture, is it sufiicient, that Anah is said at the time to have tended the asses of Zibeon his father ; for mules are not procreated of asses only, but of an ass and a mare, or of a horse and a female ass. But of horses or wild asses, by whose union with the domestic ass a mule is generated, no mention is made in this passage. In addition to these arguments, our author insists on the improbability, that the method of generating mules was discovered in Idumea at that early period ; because, the use of these animals does not seem to have become common in Judea, till the reign of David, about five hundred years after the death of Anah. No mention is made of mules in the flocks and herds of Abraham, of Isaac, of Job, and other shepherd princes of the East. In the various enumerations, horses, camels, asses, oxen, sheep, and goats, are expressly mentioned, but in relation to mules, the profoundest silence is uniformly observed ; hence, Bochart argues, that the origin of mules is involved in great uncertainty. But the assertion of that [Celebrated writer, that the Hebrew verb (nsd) matsa, sig- inifies only to find, not to invent, is incorrect. In Leigh's Critica Sacra, it signifies also to procine for himself by labour and industry; and in Parknurst, the seventh sense is, to obtain, to procure. According to these respectable authors, the text may be rendered, This was that Anah, jrho, by labour and industry, procured for himself mules in the wilderness, which is quite consistent with the com- mon exposition. If Anah did not invent the method of procreating mules, but only found them already existing, what can the sacred writer mean by the emphatical phrase. He, Anah; or, as in our version. This was that Anah? What was so remarkable or important in a person merely finding a knot of mules in the wilderness, that Moses should reckon it necessary to use such emphatical terms 1 And what r iason can be given, that he takes not the smallest notice of those who found horses, or camels, or asses in the wilderness, although some individual must have found and reduced them to a state of servitude 1 Something unusual and peculiar is certainly intended in the phrase which Moses employs : and what can that be, but the invention of a new breed of animals. The want of mules in the numer- ous herds of the patriarchs, and the late period at which they came into general use among the Jews, will not prove thai Anah was not the in venter of that spurious breed, but only, that it was not in much request till the reign of David. That the procreation of mules was actually discouraged among the holy people, we have the highest authority for asserting. The God of Israel, who is a God of order and not of confusion, enacted a law, which he introduces with more than usual solemnity, not indeed to prohibit the use of mules when procreated, but the rearing of them : " Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind." The mules which David and the nobles of his kingdom rode, were therefore, in all probability, imported from other countries where they abounded, long before the time of that illustrious monarch. Bochart offers another interpretation, which he thinks ought to be preferred ; that the original term which our translators render mules, is in reality the name of a people, probably the same as the gigantic Emim, mentioned in the fourteenth chapter .of Genesis. The Samaritan Pentateuch, accord- ingly reads here, (cn^Nn) the Emim; and the Targum in Genesis, renders the term by (n-i'^d;) giaiits ; and Aquila and Symmachus retain the Hebrew name, Emim ; so, that the passage should be rendered : This is that Anah, who found, or lighted upon, the Emim in the desert. The verb (nxd) matsa, when spoken of enemies, is used for lighting upon them, or even attacking them suddenly : several ex- amples of which, are quoted by Parkhurst. Thus, Anah is said to have found the Emim, or to have fallen upon them, or attacked them suddenly. By this daring exploit, which was greatly celebrated at the time it happened, whether he discomfited these gigantic enemies by his valour, or eluded the snare they had prepared for him bv his address, he transmitted his fame to succeeding genwa- tions; and by this criterion the historian distinguishes him from others of the same name. — Paxton. [But for this interpretation there is no evidence in his- tory, and we shall exhibit as more plausible, though by no means conclusive, the opinion of Mr. BxyanX, {Observations upon some Passages in Scripture, p. 26.) There is reason to think, that the nature of these thirsty regions above mentioned is alluded to in the history of Anah, who was of the family of Seir the Horite, into which Esau had married. " And these are the children of Zibeon" (the son of Seir) " both Aiah and Anah : this was that Anah, who found mules in the wilderness, as he fed the asses of Zibeon, his father." Gen. chap, xxxvi. ver. 24. Why the word DD"', Yamim, is here rendered mules, I know not; and why in some other versions it is expressed giants. It manifestly denotes waters; and is so translated in the Syriac version ; and by aquas calidas in the Vulgate. The translations of Aquila, Theodotion, and Symmachus, retain the original word, which they express in Greek characters lafjieiv, or laiiEiii, as if it were a proper name. The word, I make no doubt, was in common use among the Edomites, and Horites of Mount Seir. It is the same as cd'' of the scriptures, and as the word Hammim, by which baths and waters are denoted at this day by the Arabians, Persians, and other nations in the east. The account given in scripture is short, and was well understood by the persons to whom it is addressed, and undoubtedly related to water. The circumstance mentioned must have been of conse- quence, otherwise there would have been no necessity to specify the person, by whom it was eflfected. We should therefore read, that instead of m^wZes Anah found out v-ater in the wilderness : but to what does the history amount 1 Every known spring must have had somebody to have dis- covered it ; so that Anah, if this be all, did no more than hundreds had done before. But to me there seems to be something of more importance in the account than at first appears ; and for that reason the name of the person is recorded, as being of moment to those who lived in the vicinity of Edom, and were acquainted with the rites of Midian. It is to be observed, that the sacred writer, in speaking of Anah's first discovery of these waters, does not inform us, when, or where, he was feeding his father's asses ; but only that the event took place, as he was feeding them. This may be found of some moment. I imagine, that the latent purport of the history is this. As Anah was attending thfese animals, in the desert, he observed that faculty with which they were endued, of snufimg the moisture of the air, and being by these means led to latent waters. Accordingly, either by the intimation of tho.se which he fed, or by the traces of the wild brood, he wa? brought to the knowledge of those resources. And as those animals, which had been beneficial, were entitled in manj countries to a particular regard, so these among others met with uncommon reverence among the Horites ol Mount Hor, and the people of Seir : for they were looked •upon as the instruments of Heaven, towards the finding out in those barren wilds the greatest blessing. Hence 44 GENESIS. Chap. 37, 38. arose a town, and temple, where the divinity -was wor- shipped under this emblem. They stood in a valley be- neath Mount Hor, which was a part of the mountains Kiddim, upon the skirts of Edom. Thus, as I have before mentioned, what was natural sagacity, they looked upon as a supernatural impulse, an intimation from Heaven. And the animal, like the Apis and Mnevis in Egypt, was es- teemed a living emblem of the Deity, and oracular. From the situation of Petora, which was very recluse, the place being almost surrounded by high mountains, we may sup- pose, that the water was first found out in the manner above : in consequence of which the animal was looked upon as an oracle, and accordingly reverenced. And when the false prophet proved disobedient, and was going to utter his curses against God's people, he was terrified by an angel, and rebuked by the beast he strode. Instead of that divine energy, which it was at times supposed to enjoy, and for which at Petora it was in an idolatrous manner reverenced, God gave the ass a human voice, a far supe- rior and more surprising gift. Hence his power was shown above that of the gods of Edom and Midian ; and the miracle was well calculated, in respect to the person on whose account it was exhibited. That the history did not relate either to mules, or to the Emims, but on the con- trary, to water and fountains, may be seen in the name of the person. This was n:y, Anah, directly from ]>y, Ain, a fountain; and is analogous to Ilriyaios in Greek, and Fon- tanus, or Fonteius, in Latin. It is what the Greeks called a itETovoixatna^ and was bestowed in consequence of the discovery ; and is applicable to nothing else.] — B. Chap. 37. ver. 3. Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours. Rauwolf says, " that Turks of rank at Aleppo dress their sons, when they are a little grown, and can walk, in loose coats of a fine texture, in which various colours are woven, and which look very handsome." — Rosenmuller. The margin has, instead of colours, "pieces;" and it is probable the coat was patch-work of different colours. For beautiful or favourite children, precisely the same thing is done at this day. Crimson, and purple, and other colours, are often tastefully sewed together. Sometimes children of the Mohammedans have their jackets embroidered with gold and silk of various colours. A child being clothed in a garment of many colours, it is believed that neither tongues nor evil spirits will injure him, because the attention is taken from the beauty of the person, to that of the garment. Children seldom wear them after they are eight years of age ; though it must have been the custom among the an- cients referred to in the Bible to wear them longer, as we read of Tamar having " a garment of divers colours upon her ; for with such robes were the king's daughters that were virgins apparelled." — Roberts, Ver. 10. Shall I, and thy mother, and thy brethren, indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth. The Hebrew word here translated bow down, (by Lu- ther, anbelen, i. e. worship,) means the manner customary in all Asia of testifying respect to kings and princes, by falling on the knee, and stooping till the forehead touches the ground. Ovington says, " The mark of respect which is paid to kings in the East approaches very near to ado- ration. The manner of saluting the Great Mogul is, to touch with the hand first the earth, then the bre.ast, and then to lift it above, which is repeated three times in succession as you approach him." — Burder. Ver. 24. And they took him, and cast him into a pit : and the pit was empty, there was no water in it. "What is here meant by a pit is an empty cistern or re- servoir dug in the ground, in which the rain-water is col- lected, of which there are many in the Arabian deserts. Rauwolf, in the account of his Journey i]iro%s;h the Desert of Mesopotamia, says, " That the camels, besides other necessaries, were chiefly laden with water to refresh them« selves and their cattle m the sultry heat of the sun, as they do not easily meet with springs or brooks in crossing the desert : though they may by chance meet with pits or cis terns, which are for the most part 'without water, which only runs into them from the rain."— Rosenmuller. Ver. 34. And Jacob rent his clothes. This ceremony is very ancient, and is frequently men- tioned in scripture. Levi {Rites and Ceremonies of the Jews, p. 174) says, it was performed in the following manner : "they take a knife, and holding the blade downward, do give the upper garment a cut on the right side, and then rend it a hand's-breadth. This is done for the five fol- lowing relations, brother, sister, son, or daughter, or wife ; but for father or another, the rent is on the left side, and in all the garments, as coat, waistcoat, &c." — Burder. Chap. 38. ver. 14. And she put her "widow's garments off from her, and covered her with a veil, and wrapped herself, and sat in an open place, which is by the way to Timnath : for she saw that Shelah was grown, and she was not given unto hii^a to wife,. The habit of eastern females was also suited to their station ; and women of all ages and conditions, appeared in dresses of the same fashion ; only a married woman wore a veil upon her head, in token of subjection ; and a widow had a garment which indicated her widowed state. The daughters of a king, and ladies of high rank, who were virgins, wore a garment of many colours, reaching, as is supposed, to the heels or ankles, with long sleeves down to the wrists, which had a border at the bottom, and a facing at the hands, of a colour different from the gar- ment : it was likewise embroidered with flowers, which in ancient times, was reckoned both splendid and beautiful. Before the Jews were carried captives to Babylon, their wives and daughters had arrived at the greatest degree of extravagance in dress. The prophet Isaiah gives a long list of the vestments, trinkets, and ornaments in use among the ladies of Israel, in that remote age ; the greater part of which, it is extremely diflicult to describe. A common prostitute among the Jews was known, as well by the pe- culiar vesture she wore, as by having no covering upon her head, and her eyebrows painted with stibium, w^hich dilated the hair, and made the eyes look black and beauti- ful. In the days of Jacob, the harlot seemed to have been distinguished by her veil, and by wrapping herself in some peculiar manner ; for these are the circumstances that in- duced Judah to consider Tamar his daughter-in-law as a woman of this character: When Judah saw her, he thought her to be a harlot, because she had covered her face. It may be justly inferred from this passage, that modest wo- men did not constantly wear a veil in those days. Rebecca, indeed, put a veil upon her face when she met Isaac in the field : but it was a part of the marriage ceremony to de- liver the bride covered with a veil, from head to foot ; and Rebecca, in this instance, only followed the established custom of her country. Had it been the practice of modest women in that age to cover their faces, jn the presence of the other sex, she would not have needed to veil herself when her future husband met her in the field. She seems to have had no veil when Abraham's servant accosted her at the well ; nor, for any thing that can be discovered, was Rachel veiled at her first interview with Jacob ; or if they did ap- Eear in veils, these prevented not a part of the face from eing seen. The practice of wearing veils, except at the marriage ceremony, must, therefore, be referred to a later period, and was perhaps not introduced till after the lapse of several ages. These observations may serve to illus- trate the address of Abimelech to Sarah: "Behold, he is to thee a coverinfr of the eyes, unto all that are with thee ; and with all other." Sarah, you have not been used to wear the veil constantly when at home, as a person of your beauty and accomplishments should do, and by that cir- cumstance we were tempted ; but now I insist that you wear a covering, which, by concealing your beautiful counte- nance, may prevent such desires ; and henceforth be correct, (as the word may be rendered, that is, circumspect,) and do Chap. 38—41. GENESIS. 45 not show yourself; or, as in our translation, thus she was corrected, reproved, by a very handsome compliment paid to her beauty, and a very handsome present paid to her brother, as Abraham is sarcaGtically termed by Abimelech. — Paxton. Ver. 18. And he said, What pledge shall I give thee 1 and she said. Thy signet, and thy brace- lets, and thy staff that is in thy hand : and he gave it her, and came in unto her : and she conceived by him. The signet used by kings and persons of rank in the East was a ring which served all the purposes of sealing. All the Orientals, instead of signature by sign manual, use the impression of a seal on which their name and title (if they have one) is engraved. Among intriguing and mali- cious people, it is so easy to turn the possession of a man's seal to his disgrace, by making out lalse documents, that the loss of it always produces great concern. This shows how much Judah put himself in the power of Tamar, when he gave her his signet ; and one reason of his anxiety, ** Let her take it to her, lest we be ashamed," may therefore mean something beyond the mere discovery of the im- moral action ; " Lest by some undue advantage taken of the signet, I maybe endangered." In an Indian court, the monarch still takes the ring from his finger, and affixes it to the decree, and orders the posts to be despatched to the provinces, as in the reign of Ahasuerus. When an eajstem prince delivers the seal of empire to a royal guest, he treats him as a superior ; but when he delivers it to a subject, it is only a sign of investiture with office. Thus the king of Egypt took otfhis ring from his hand and put it upon Joseph's hand, when he made him ruler over all his dominions ; and the king of Persia took off the ring which he had taken from Haman and gave it unto Mor- decai. — Paxton. Chap. 39. ver. 6. And he left all that he had in Joseph's hand ; and he knew not aught he had, save the bread which he did eat. All resi)ectable men have a head servant called a Kani- ka-Pulli, i. e. an accountant, in whose hands they often place all they possess. Such a man is more like a rela- tion or a friend, than a servant; for, on all important subjects, he is regularly consulted, and his opinion will have great weight with the family. When a native gen- tleman has such a servant, it is common to say of him, " Ah ! he has nothing — all is in the hand of his Kanika- ^vMi." — " Yes, yes. he is the treasure pot." *' He knows of nothing but the food he eats." — Roberts. Chap. 40. ver. 13. Yet within three days shall Pharaoh lift up thy head, and restore thee unto thy place : and thou shalt deliver Pharaoh's cup into his hand, after the former manner when thou wast his butler. The ancients, in keeping their reckonings or accounts of time, or their list of domestic officers or servants, made use of tables with holes bored in them, in which they put a sort of pegs, or nails with broad heads, exhibiting the particulars, either number or name, or whatever it was. These nails or pegs the Jews call headS, and the sockets of the heads they call bosses. The meaning therefore of 'Pharaoh's Ufli7ig up his head is, iha.t Pharaoh would take out the peg, which had the cup-bearer's name on the top of it, to read it, i. e. would sit in judgment, and make ex- amination into his accounts ; for it seems very probable that both he and the baker had been either suspected or accused of having cheated the king, and that, when their accounts were examined and cast up, the one was acquit- ted, while the other was found guilty. And though Joseph uses the same expression in both cases, yet we may observe that, speaking to the baker, he adds, that Pharaoh shall lift up thy head from off thee, i. e. shall order thy name to be .struck out of the list of his servants, by takins: thy peg out of the socket. — Bibliotheca Biblica, cited by Stackhouse. Chap. 41. ver. 40. Thou shalt be over my house, and according unto thy word shall all my peo- ple be ruled : only in the throne will I be greater than thou. Pococke, when he describes the Egyptian compliments, tells us, that upon their taking any thing from the hand of a superior, or that is sent from such a one, they kiss it, and as the highest respect put it to their foreheads. This is not peculiar to those of that country : for the editor of the Ruins of Balbec observed, that the Arab governor of that city respectfully applied the firman of the Grand Seignior to his forehead^ which was presented to him when he and his fellow-travellers first waited on him, and then kissed it, declaring himself the Sultan's slave's slave. Is not this what Pharaoh refers to in Gen. xli. 40'? " Thou shalt be over my house, and according unto thy word," (or on ac- count of thy word,) " shall all my people kiss," (for so it is in the original ;) " only in the throne will I be greater than thou :" that is, 1 imagine, the orders of Joseph were to be received with the greatest respect by all, and kissed by the most illustrious of the princes of Egypt. Drusius might well deny the sense that Kimchi and Grotius put on these words, the appointing that all the people should kiss his mouth. That would certainly be reckoned in the West, in every part of the earth, as well as in the ceremonious East, so remarkable for keeping up dignity and state, a most strange way of commanding the second man in the kingdom to be honoured. It is very strange then that these commentators should propose such a thought ; and the more so, as the Hebrew word "'d pee is well known to signify word, or commandment, as well as month. As this is apparent from Gen. xlv. 21 ; so also that the prepo- sition bv at, often signifies according to, or on account of, is put out of the question by that passage, as well as by Sam. iv. 12, Ezra x. 9, &c. These are determinations that establish the exposition I have been giving. " Upon thy commandment,'^ or when thou sendest out orders, " my people, from the highest to the lowest, shall kiss,'' receiving them with the profoundest respect and obedience. — Harmeii. In Psalm ii. 12, it is written, " Kiss the son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way." Bishop Patrick says on this, " Kiss the son ; that is, submit to him, and obey him." Bishop Pococke says, " The Egyptians, on taking any thing from the hand of* a superior, or that is sent from him, kiss it; and, as the highest respect, put it to their foreheads." It is therefore probable that Pharaoh meant, that all should submit to Joseph, that all should obey him, and pay him reverence, and that only on the throne he himself^ would be greatest. When a great man causes a gift to be handed to an inferior, the latter will take it, and put it on the right cheek, so as to cover the eyes ; then on the left ; after which he will kiss it. This is done to show the great superiority of the donor, and that he on whom the gift is bestowed is his dependant, and greatly reverences him. When a man of rank is angry with an inferior, the latter will be advised to go and kiss his feet ; which he does by touching his feet with his hands, and then kissing them. When the Mohammedans meet each other after a long ab- sence, the inferior will touch the hand of the superior, and then kiss it. All, then, were to kiss Joseph, and acknow- ledge him as their ruler. — Roberts. Ver. 42. And Pharaoh took off his ring from his hand, and put it upon Joseph's hand. That is, his signet. In the ring there is generally a seal, on which the name of the sovereign is engraved. This signet is dipped in a coloured matter, and impressed over the royal orders, instead of the king's title. Whoever is in possession of this seal, can issue commands in the name of the king. What is said in this text, would be expressed in modern language by, " Pharaoh raised Joseph to the dig- nity of grand vizier.'' The symbol of power and authority given to the grand vizier, is the seal of the sultan with his cipher, which is intrusted to his care. The signet was considered, in the East, from the most ancient times, as the sign of delegated power. That given to the grand vizier is so great, that no officer of state, no minister, dares to resist, or even to contradict his orders, without risking his head, because every one of his commands is obeyed, as if 46 GENESIS. Chap. 41 — 43, it had proceeded from the throne, or from the mouth of the sultan. He likewise receives almost royal honours; all about him bears the stamp of the highest honour, power, and splendour. Liidecke, in his Description of the Turkish Empire, says, " The grand vizier is the principal of all the ofticers of state, and his dignity is similar to that with which Pharaoh invested Joseph. He is called Your High- ness. The emperor scarcely differs from him except in name. There is nothing at the European courts similar to his dignity, and the premiers ministres, as they are called, are nothing to him. Being keeper of the imperial signet, he always has it suspended round his neck. The investing him with it, is the sign of his elevation to office, and the taking it off, of his discharge. Without further orders or responsibility, he issues all orders for the em- Eire." In like manner, when Alexander the Great, on is death-bed, delivered his signet to Perdiccas, it was concluded that he had also given to him his royal powers, and intended him for his successor. (Curtius.) — The ar- raying of Joseph in fine linen, was probably a part of the ceremony of investing him with his high dignity. Thus the grand vizier on the day of his appointment is invested with a double golden caftan, or robe of honour. — Rosen- MULLER. This practice is still common, but was much more so in former times. " Aruchananan, a king, once became greatly enamoured with a princess called Alii, and desired to have her in marriage ; but being in doubt whether he should be able to have her, he sent for a woman who w^as well skilled in palmistry ! She looked carefully into his hand, and declared, 'You will marry a princess called Alii— you shall have her.' The king was so delighted, that he took his ring off his finger, and put it upon that of the fortuneteller.''^ Should a rich man be greatly pleased with a performer at a comedy, he will call him to him, and take off the ring from his finger, and present it to him. Does a poet please a man of rank ; he w'ill take the ring off his finger, and put it on his. A father gives his son-in- law elect a r'ng from off his finger. When the bridegroom g.>es to the ho!i?e of his bride, her brother meets him, and pears water on his feet ; then the former takes a ring from off his finger, and puts it on that of the latter. Does one man send to another for any particular article, or to solicit a favour, and should he not have time to write, he will give his ring to the messenger, and say, " Show this in proof of my having sent you to make this request." Is a master at a distance, and does he wish to introduce a per- son to the notice of another; he says, '• Take this ring, and YOU "will be received." Pharaoh's ring carried with it the highest mark of favour towards Joseph, and was a proof of the authority conferred on him. — Roberts. Ver, 43. And he made him to ride in the second chariot which he had ; and they cried before him. Bow the knee : and he made him ruler over all the land of Egypt. As to magnificent riding, chariots are not now made use of in the East, either by men, or even the fair sex. It may be difficult to say what this is owing to : whether to the dif- ficulty of their roads, or to the clumsy and unmechanical manner of constructing their carriages ; or to a junction of both causes. Certain it is, that they are not now used in these countries : and the magnificence of the furniture of their horses makes up the want of pompous chariots. Anciently, however, chariots were used by the great: they were thought most deadly machines of war ; it was courage in war that in those ruder times gave dignity, and seems to have been chiefly looked at in conferring royal honours; it was natural then for their kings to ride in chariots, as their great warriors at that time in common did ; which royal chariots were without doubt most highly ornamented. In the most magnificent of all that Pharaoh had, but one, Joseph was made to ride. But when chariots were laid aside in war, their princes laid aside the use of them by degrees, and betook themselves to horses, as upon the whole most agreeable, and they endeavoured to transfer the pomp of their chariots to them, and richly indeed they do adorn them. — Harmer. The Hebrew has for bow the knee, ^^ Tender Father,^'' which I believe to be the true meaning. Dr. Adam Clarke says the word i->2n abrec, which we translate bow the knee, might as well be translated any thing else. In chapter xlv. 8, Joseph says himself, " God hath made me a father to Pharaoh J" A younger brother is called the little father ; he being the next in authority. The king's minister (if a good man) is called the little father. There are five per- sons who have a right to this parental title. Tlie father himself, a king, a priest, a gooroo or teacher, and a bene- factor. Joseph was indeed the father of the Egyptians. — Roberts. Chap. 42. ver. 15. Hereby ye shall be proved: by the life of Pharaoh, ye shall not go forth hence, except your youngest brother come hither. Extraordinary as the kind of oath which Joseph made use of may appear to us, it still continues in the East. Mr. Hanway says, the most sacred oath among the Persians is " by the king's head ;" and among other instances of it we read in the Travels of the Ambassadors, that "there were but sixty horses for ninety-four persons. The mehemander (or conductor) swore by the head of the king, (which is the greatest oath among the Persians,) that he could not possi- bly find any more." And Thevenot says, " his subjects never look upon him but with fear and trembling ; and they have such respect for him, and pay so blind an obedi- ence to a.., ais orders, that how unjust soever his commands might be, t^ey perform them, though against the law both of God and nature. Nay, if they swear by the king^s head., their oath is more authentic, and of greater credit, than if they swore by all that is most sacred in heaven and upon earth."— Burder. Ver. 37. And Reuben spake unto his father, say- ing, Slay my two sons, if I bring him not to thee: deliver him into my hand, and I will bring him to thee again. Is a man placed in great difficulty, and does he make a solemn promise, in which another person is also involved ; he will say, " Ah ! if I do not this thing, then kill my chil- dren." "Yes, my lord, my children shall die if I do not accomplish this object." " Ah ! my children, your lives are concerned in this matter." — Roberts. Chap. 43. ver. 3. And Judah spake unto him, saying, The man did solemnly protest unto us, saying, Ye shall not see my face, except your brother he with you. ^ See on 2 Sam. 14. 24. Ver. 7. And we told him according to the tenor of these words. The margin has, for words, " mouth." Send a messenger with a message to deliver, and ask him, on his return, what he said, he will reply, " According to your mouth .'"— Roberts. Ver. 18. Seek occasion against us, and fall upon us. The margin has this, " Roll himself upon us." (Job XXX. 14. Psa. xxii. 8. xxxvii. 5. Prov. xvi. 3.) For to say a man rolls himself upon another, is the eastern way of saying he falls upon him. Is a person beaten or injured by another : he says of the other, " He rolled himself upon me." Of the individual who is always trying to live upon another, who is continually endeavouring to get something out of him, it is said, " That fellow is for ever rolling him- self upon him." So, also, " I will not submit to his conduct any longer; I will beat him, and roll myself upon him." Has a man committed an offence, he is advised to go to the offended, and roll himself upon him. A person in great sorrow, who is almost destitute of friends, asks in his dis- tress, " Upon whom shall I roll myself 7" When men or women are in great misery, they wring their hands and roll themselves on the earth. Devotees roll themselves round the temple, or after the sacred car. — Roberts. Chap. 44. GENESIS. 47 Ver. 19. And tho.y came near to the steward of Joseph's house, and they communed with him at the door of the house. Who, in India, lias not seen similar scenes to this"? When people come from a distance to do business, or to hava an interview with a person, they do not (if it can be avoided) go to him at once, but try to find out the head ser- ' vant, and after having made him some little present, try to ascertain the disposition of his master, what are his habits, his possessions, and his family. Every thing connected with the object of their visit is thoroughly sifted^ so that when they have to meet the individual, they are complete- ly prepared for him ! — Roberts. Ver. 25. And they made ready the present against Joseph came at noon : for they heard that they should eat bread |here. Presents are commonly sent, even to persons in private station, with great parade. The money which the bride- grooms of Syria pay for their brides, is laid out in furni- ture for a chamber, in clothes, jewels, and ornaments of gold for the bride, which are sent with great pomp to the bridegroom's house, three days before the wedding. In Egypt they are not less ostentatious; every article of fur- niture, dress, and ornament is displayed, and they never fail to load upon four or five horses, what might easily be carried by one : in like manner, they place in fifteen dishes, the jewels, trinkets, and other things of value, which a single plate would very well contain. The sacred writer seems to allude to some pompous arrangement of this kind, in the history of Joseph : " And they made ready the pres- ent against Joseph came at noon." They probably sepa- rated into distinct parcels, and committed to so many bearers, the balm, the honey, the spices, the myrrh, the nuts, and the almonds, of which their present consisted. — Paxton. Ver. 29. And he lifted up his eyes, and saw his brother Benjamin, his mother's son, and said. Is this your younger brother, of whom ye spake unto me? And he said, God be gra- cious unto thee, my son. The forms of salutation in the East wear a much more serious and religious air than those in use among the na- tions of Europe. " God be gracious unto thee, my son," were the words which Joseph addressed to his brother Benjamin. In this country, it would be called a benedic- tion; but Chardin asserts, that in Asia, it is a simple salu- tation, and used there instead of those offers and assu- rances of service which it is the custom to use in the West. The Orientals, indeed, are exceedingly eloquent in wishing good and the mercy of God on all occasions to one another, even to those they scarcely know ; and yet their compli- ments are as hollow and deceitful as those of any other people. This appears from scripture, to have been always their character : " They bless with their mouths, but they curse inwardly." These benedictory forms explain the reason, why the sacred writers so frequently call the salu- tation and farewell of the East, by the name of blessing. —Paxton. " God be gracious unto thee, my son," was the address of Joseph to his brother Benjamin; "and in this way do people 3f respectability or years address their inferiors or juniors. " So7i, give me a little water." " The sun is very hot ; I will rest under your shade, my son." — Roberts. Ver. 32. And they set on for him by himself, and for them by themselves, and for the Egyptians, which did eat with him, by themselves: be- cause the Egyptians might not eat bread with the Hebrews ; for that is an abomination unto the Egyptians. 33. And they sat before him, the first-born according to his birthright, and the youngest according to his youth : and the men marvelled one at another. 34. And ho took and sent messes unto them from before him : but Benjamin's mess was five times so much as any of theirs. And they drank, and were merry with him. Public entertainments in the East, are not all conducted in the same way. At Aleppo, the several dishes are brought in one by one ; and after the company has eaten a little of each, they are removed ; but among the Arabs, the whole provisions are set on the table at once. In Per- sia, where the last custom is followed, the viands are dis- tributed by a domestic, who takes portions of different kinds out of the large dishes in wliich they are served up, and lays four or five different kinds of meat in one smaller dish; these are set, furnished after this manner, before the company ; one of these spaller dishes being placed before two persons only, or at most three. The same practice obtains at the royal table itself. It is not improba- ble that the ancient Egyptians treated their guests in a similar way ; and in the entertainment given by Joseph to his brethren, we may discover many points of resemblance. The Persians were placed in a row on one side of the room, without any person before them ; a distinct dish, with dif- ferent kinds of food, was set before every guest; circum- stances which entirely correspond with the arrangement of Joseph's entertainment. — Paxton. Ver. 34. And he took and sent messes unto them from before him : but Benjamin's mess was five times so much as any of theirs. And they drank, and were merry with him. The manner of eating among the ancients was not for all the company to eat out of one and the same dish, but for every one to have one or more dishes to himself. Th« whole of these dishes were set before the master of thw feast, and he distributed to every one his portion. As Jo- seph, however, is here said to have had a table to himself, we may suppose that he had a great variety of little dishes or plates set before him ; and as it was a custom for great men to honour those who were in their favour, by sending such dishes to them as were first served up to themselves, Jo- seph showed that token of respect to his brethren ; but tc express a particular value for Benjamin, he sent him five dishes to their one, which disproportion could not but be marvellous and astonishing to them, if what Herodotus tells us be true, that the distinction in this case, even to Egyp- tian kings themselves, in all public feasts and banquets, was no more than a double mess. — Stackhouse. Chap. 44. ver. 1. And he commanded the stew- ard of his house, saying, Fill the men's sacks with food, as much as they can carry, and put every man's money in his sack's mouth. There are two sorts of sacks taken notice of in the his- tory of Joseph, which ought not to be confounded ; one for the corn, the other for the baggage. There are no w^ag- ons almost through all Asia as far as to the Indies ; eveif thing is carried upon beasts of burden, in sacks oi wool, covered in the middle with leather, the better to majce re- sistance to water. Sacks of this sort are called lambellit; they enclose in them their things done up in large parcels. It is of this kind of sacks we are to understand -t'hat issaid here and all through this history, and not of their sacjiis in which they carry their corn. — Harmer. Ver. 18. Then Judah came near unto him, and said, O my lord, let thy servant, I pray thee, speak a word in my lord's ears, and let not thine anger burn against thy servant : for thou art even as Pharaoh. A company of people have always some one among them, who is known and acknowledged to be the chief speaker ; thus, should they fall into trouble, he will be the person to come forward and plead with the superior. He will say, " My lord, I am indeed a very ignorant person, and am not worthy to speak to vou : were I of high caste, perhaps 48 GENESIS. Chap. 44—46. my lord would hear me. May I say two or three words ?" (some of the party will then say, "Yes, yes, our lord will hear you.") He then proceeds, — " Ah, rny lord, your mercy is known to all; great is your wisdom; you are even as a king to us : let, then, your servants find favour in your sight." He then, like Judah, relates the whole affair, for- getting no circumstance which has a tendency to exculpate him and his companions ; and every thing which can touch the feelings of his judge will be gently brought before him. As he draws to a conclusion, his pathos increases, his com- panions put out their hands in a supplicating manner, ac- companied by other gesticulations; their tears begin to flow, and with one voice they cry, " Forgive us, this time, and we will never offend you more." — Roberts, Ver. 21. And thou saidst unto thy servant. Bring him down unto me, that I may set mine eyes upon him. Has a beloved son been long absent, does the father anx- iously desire to see him, he says, " Bring him, bring him, chat the course of my eyes may be upon him." " Ah, my eyes, do you again see my son 1 Oh, my eyes, is not this pleasure for youV — Robekts. Chap. 45. ver. 2. And he wept aloud: and the Egyptians and the house of Pharaoh heard. Hebrew, " gave forth his voice in weeping." In this way do they speak of a person who thus conducts himself: " How loudly did he give forth his voice and weep." " That child is for ever giving forth its voice." The vio- lence of their sorrow is very great, and their voice may be heard at a considerable distance. — Roberts. " This," says Chardin, " is exactly the genius of the peo- ple of Asia, especially of the women. Their sentiments of joy or of grief are properly transports; and their trans- ports are ungoverned, excessive, and truly outrageous. When any one returns from a long journey, or dies, his family burst into cries, that may be heard twenty doors off; and this is renewed at different times, and continues many days, according. to the vigour of the passion. Especially are these cries long in the case of death, and frightful, for *he mourning is right down despair, and an image of hell. I was lodged in. the year 1676, at Ispahan, near the Roval square ; the mistress of the next house to mine died at that time. The moment she expired, all the family, to the num- ber of twenty-five or thirty people, set up such a furious erv, that I w'as quite startled, and was above two hours before I could recover myself. These cries continue a long time, then cease all at once; they begin again as sud- denly, at daybreak, and in concert. It is this suddenness which is so terrifying, together with a greater shrillness and loudness than one could easily imagine. This enraged kind of mourning, if I may call it so, continued forty days ; not equally violent, but with diminution from day to day. The longest and most violent acts were when they washed the body, when they perfumed it, when they carried it out to be interred, at making the inventory, and when they di- vided the effects. You are not to suppose that those that were ready to split their throats with crying out, wept as much ; the greatest part of them did not shed a single tear through the whole tragedy." This is a very distinct de- scription of eastern mourning for the dead : they cry out too, it seems, on other occasions ; no wonder then the house of Pharaoh heard, when Joseph wept at making himself known to his brethren.— Harmer. Ver. 14. And he fell upon his brother Benjamin's neck, and wept ; and Benjamin wept upon his neck. 15. Moreover, he kissed all his brethren, and wept upon them ; and after that his brethren talked with him. When people meet, after long absence, they fall on each other's shoulder or neck, and kiss or smell the part. A husband, after long absence, kisses or smells the fore- head, the eyes, the right and left cheeks, and the bosom, of kis wife. — Roberts. Ver. 17. And Pharaoh said unto Joseph, Say unto thy brethren. This do ye ; lade your beasts. Nearly all the merchandise, which goes by land, is car- ried by beasts of burden ; and, no doubt, will continue to be so till regular roads are constructed. Hence may be seen hundreds of bullocks, or camels, carrying rice, salt, spices, and other wares, traversing the forests and deserts to dis- tant countries. Some of the buffaloes carry immense bur- dens, and though they only make little progress, yet they are patient and regular in their pace. Bells are tied pound the necks of some of the animals, the sound of which pro- duces a pleasing effect on the feelings of a traveller, who now knows that he is not far from some of his fellows. The sound of the bells also keeps the cattle together, and frightens off the wild beasts. — Roberts. Chap. 46. ver. 4. I will go down with thee into Egypt ; and I will also surely bring thee up again : and Joseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes. A father, at the point of death, is always very desirous that his wife, children, and grandchildren should be with him. Should there be one at a distance, he will be imme- diately sent for, and until he arrives the father will mourn and complain, " My son, will you not come 1 I cannot die without you." When he arrives, he will take the hands of his son, and kiss them, and place them on his eyes, his face, and mouth, and say, " Now I die." — Roberts. Ver. 6. And came inio Egypt, Jacob, and all his seed with him. In this way descendants are spoken of. Has a man been deceived by another, he will be asked, " How could you trust him 1 did you not know him to be bad {veethe) seed." " That fellow is of the seed of fiends." " The reason you see such good things in that youth is, that he is of good seed." " The old man and his seed have all left this village many years ago." — Roberts. Ver. 24. For every shepherd is an abomination unto the Egyptians. Cunpeus, with great plausibility, ascribes this detestation on the part of the Egyptians, to the ferocious dispositions and rebellious conduct of the shepherds who tended their flocks in the plains and marshes of lower Egypt, " These," says that writer, "were active and able men, but execrable to all the Egyptians, because they would not sufler them to lead their idle course of life in security. These men often excited great commotions, and sometimes created kings for themselves. It was on this account, that the Romans, in succeeding times, when they easily held the rest of Egypt in obedience, placed a strong garrison in all these parts. When you have taken the most exact survey of all circum- stances, you will find this was the reason that made the Egyptians, even from the first, so ill affected to shepherds ; because these sedentary men and handicrafts could not endure their fierce and active spirits. Pharaoh himself, when he had determined to abate and depress the growing numbers of the Israelites, spake to his subjects in this man- ner : * The Israelites are stronger than we ; let us deal wisely, that they increase not, lest, when war arises, they join themselves to our enemies, and take up arms against us.' But this view does not account for the use of the term which is properly rendered abomination, and which indicates, not a ferocious and turbulent character, which is properly an object of dread and hatred, but a mean and despicable person, that excites the scorn and contempt of his neighbours. It is readily admitted, that the detestation in which shepherds were held in Eg>'pt, could not arise from their employment in the breeding of cattle ; for the king himself, in the days of Joseph, had very numerous flocks and herds, in the management of which he did not think it unbecoming his dignity to take a lively interest. This is proved bv the command to his favourite minister ; ' If thou knowest any men of activity among them, then make them rulers over my cattle.' Nor were his numer- ous subjects less attentive to this branch of industry ; every one seems to have lived upon his paternal farm, part of which was converted into pasture. Hence, when money failed in the vears of famine, 'all the Egyptians came to Joseph and said, Give us bre.id ; for why should we die in Chap. 47—49. GENESIS. 49 thy presence '? for the money faileth. And Joseph said, Give your cattle, and I will give you bread for your cattle, if money fail." But if Pharaoh and all his subjects, were themselves engaged in the rearing of stock, a shepherd could not be to them an object of general abhorrence. Be- sides, it was not unlawful in Egypt to deprive an ox or a sheep of life, and feast upon the' flesh ; for, in the temples, these animals were offered in sacrifice every day ; and for what purpose did the Egyptians rear them on their farms, but to use them as food 1 The contempt in which this or- der of men were held, could not then be owing to the super- stition of the nation in general. It may even be inferred from the command of Pharaoh to Joseph, requiring him to appoint the most active of his brethren rulers over his cat- tle, that the ofi&ce of a shepherd was honourable among the Egyptians ; for it could not be his design to degrade the brethren of his favourite minister. This idea is confirmed by Diodorus, who asserts that husbandmen and shepherds were held in very great estimation in that country. But that writer states a fact, which furnishes the true solution of the difficulty — that in some parts of Egypt, shepherds were not suffered. The contempt of shepherds seems, therefore, to have been confined to some parts of the king- dom ; probably to ihe royal city, and the principal towns in Upper Egypt, where the luxury of a court, or the wealth and splendour of the inhabitants, taughtj them to look down with contempt and loathing upon those humble peasants. But the true reason seems to be stated by Herodotus, who informs us that those who worship in the temple of the The- ban Jupiter, or belong to the district of Thebes, the ancient capital of Egypt, abstained from sheep and sacrificed goats. But sheep and oxen were the animals which the shepherds usually killed for general use. It was natural, therefore, for that superstitious people to regard with abhorrence those who were in the daily practice of slaughtering the objects of their religious veneration. But this custom was con- fined to the district of Thebes ; for, according to the same writer, " in the temple of Mendes, and in the whole Men- desian district, goats were preserved and sheep sacrificed." Shepherds, therefore, might be abhorred in one part of Egypt and honoured in another. The sagacious prime minister of Egypt, desirous to remove his brethren from the fascinations of wealth and power, directed them to give such an account of themselves, that the counsellors of Pharaoh, from their dislike of the mean employment in which they had been educated, might grant their request, and suffer them to settle in Goshen, a land of shepherds, far removed from the dangerous blandishments of a court. — Paxton. Chap. 47. ver. 29. And the time drew nigh that Israel must die : and he called his son Joseph, and said unto him, If now I have found grace in thy sight, put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh, and deal kindly and truly with me ; bury me not, I pray thee, in Egypt. See on chap. 24. 2, 3. Chap. 49. ver. 3. Reuben, thou art my first-born, my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency of power. It is generally believed that the first-bom son is the strongest, and he is always placed over his brethren. To him the others must give great honour, and they must not sit in his presence without his permission, and then only behind him. When the younger visits the elder, he goes with great respect, and the conversation is soon closed. Should there be any thing of a particular nature, on which he desires the sentiments of his elder brother, he sends a friend to converse with him. The younger brother will not enter the door at the same time with the elder; he must al- ways follow. Should they be invited to a marriage, care will be taken that the oldest shall go in the first. The younger will never approach him with his wooden sandals on, he must take them off. He will not speak to the wife of the elder, except on some special occasion. When the father thinks his end is approaching, he calls his children, and, addressing himself to the elder, says, " My strength, |Dy glory, my all is in thee." From this may be gained an idea of the importance which was attached to the " birth- right." — Roberts. Ver. 8. Judth, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise ; thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies. The oriental conqueror oflen addressed his unfortunate captives in the most insulting language, of which the pro- phet Isaiah has left us a specimen : " But I will put it (the cup of Jehovah's fuify) into the hand of them that afflict thee ; which have said to thy soul, bow down that we may go over." And their actions were as harsh as their words were haughty; they made them bow down to the very ground, and put their feet upon their necks, and trampled them in the mire. This indignity the chosen people of God were obliged to suffer: " Thou hast laid thy body as the ground, and as the street to them that went over." Conquer- ors of a milder and more humane disposition put their hand upon the neck of their captives, as a mark of tneir superior- ity. This custom may be traced as high as the age in which Jacob flourished; for in his farewell blessing to Judah, he thus alludes to it: " Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise ; thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies." This benediction, which at once foretold the victorious career of that warlike tribe, and suggested the propriety of treating their prisoners with moderation and kindness, was fulfilled in the person of David, and ac- knowledged by him : " Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies, that I might destroy them that hate me." Traces of this custom may be discovered in the manners of other nations. Among the Franks it was usual to put the arm round the neck, as a mark of superiority on the part of him by whom it was done. When Chrodin, decli- ning the oflice of mayor of the palace, chose a young nobleman named Goga'n, to fill that place, he immediately took the arm of the young man, and put it round his own neck, as a mark of his dependance on him, and that he acknowledged him for his general and chief. — Paxton. Ver. 9. Judah is a lion's whelp ; from the prey, my son, thou art gone up : he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an aid lion : who shall rouse him up? The Hebrew words will be more accurately expressed by the following translation : — a young lion is Judah, From prey, my son, art thou become great ; He bends his feet under him and couches Like a lion and like a Uoness ; Who shall rouse him upl Judah is compared to a young lion, which becomes great by prey, and which, when grown up and satiated with booty, is found reposing with his feet bent under his breast. The lion does this when he has eaten sufiiciently ; he then does not attack passengers, but if any one would venture to rouse him out of wantonness, he would repent of his temerity. The meaning of the image is, that the tribe of Judah would at first be very warlike and valiant, but in the sequel, satia- ted by conquests and victories, would cease to attack its neighbours, yet had made itself so terrible that nobody would venture to attack it. Among the eastern nations, the lion was always the emblem of warlike valour and might. — BURDER, Ver. 11. Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine. One species of vine is not less distinguished by the luxuriance of its growth, than by the richness and delicacy of its fruit. This is the Sorek of the Hebrews, which the prophet Isaiah has chosen to represent the founders of his nation — men renowned for almost every virtue which can adorn the human character: "My well-beloved has a vineyard in a very fruitful hill, and he planted it with Sorek, or the choicest vine." It is to this valuable species that Jacob refers, in his prophetic benediction addressed to Judah ; and the manner in which he speaks of it is remark- able : " Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine." In some parts of Persia it was formerly the custom to turn their cattle into the vinc;3'ard$ 50 GENESIS. Chap. 49 after the vintage, to browse on the vines, some of which are so large, that a man can hardly compass their trunks in his arms. These facts clearly show, ^at agreeably to the prediction of Jacob, the ass might be slcurely bound to the vine, and without damaging the tree by browsing on its leaves and branches. The same custom appears, from the narratives of several travellers, to have generally pre- vailed in the Lesser Asia. Chandler observed, that in the vineyards around Smyrna, the leaves of the vines were decayed or stripped by the camels, or herds of goats, which are permitted to browse uport them after the vin- tage. When he left Smyrna on the thirtieth of September, the vineyards were already bare ; but when he arrived at Phygela, on the fifth or sixth of October, he found its terri- tory still green with vines; which is a proof, that the vineyards at Sm /"rna must have been stripped by the cattle, which delight to feed upon the foliage. This custom fur- nishes a satisfactory reason for a regulation in the laws of Moses, the meaning of which has been very imperfectly understood, which forbids a man to introduce his beast into the vineyard of his neighbour. It was destructive to the vineyard before the fruit was gathered ; and after the vintage, it was still a serious injury, because it deprived the owner of the fodder, which was most grateful to his flocks and herds, and perhaps absolutely requisite for their subsistence during the winter. These things considered, we discern in this enactment, the justice, wisdom, and kindness of the great legislator: and the same traits of excellence might no doubt be discovered in the most ob- scure and minute regulation, could we detect the reason on which it is founded. — Paxton. Ver. 14. Issachar is a strong ass, couching- down between two burdens: 15. And he saw that rest was good, and the land that it was pleasant; and bowed his shoulder to bear, and became a servant unto tribute. The ass is not more remarkable for his power to sustain, ".ban for his patience and tranquillity when oppressed by an unequal load. Like the camel, he quietly submits to -Vie heaviest burden ; he bears it peaceably, till he can pro- ceed no farther ; and when his strength fails him, instead of resisting or endeavouring to throw off the oppressive Aveight, he contentedly lies down, and rests himself under it, recruits his vigour with the provender that may be of- fered him, and then, at the call of his master, proceeds on his journey. To this trait in the character oi that useful animal, the dying patriarch evidently refers, when, under the afflatus of inspiration, he predicts the future lot and con- duct of Issachar and his descendants. " Issachar is a strong ass, couching down between two burdens. And he saw that rest was good, and the land that it was pleasant, and bowed his shoulder to bear, and became a servant unto trib- ute." This tribe, naturally dull and stupid, should, like '.he creature by which they were characterized, readily .submit to the vilest master and the meanest service. Al- .nough, like the ass, possessed of ability, if properly exert- ed and rightly directed, to shake off the inglorious yoke of r^ervitude, they would basely submit to the insults of the Phenicians on the one hand, and the Samaritans on the other. Issachar was a strong ass, " able," says a sprightly writer, " to refuse a load, as well as to bear it ; but like the passive drudge which symbolized him, he preferred inglorious ease to the resolute vindication of his liberty ; a burden of tribute, to the gains of a just and well-regulated freedom ; and a yoke of bondage, to the doubtful issues of war." — Paxton. " Couching down between two burdens." The original word rendered " burdens," we believe, after careful investi- gation, properly signifies the double partition forming the sides of a stall for cattle or asses, or the bars and timbers of which they were made. A similar structure was erect- ed about the dwellings of the Jews, in which their pots, kettles, and other kitchen utensils, were hung, and there- fore rendered by Gusset, in Ps. 68. 14, " pot-ranges." This expression, as applied to a region of country, would natu- rally be supposed to imply two very marked and conspicu- ous'limits, as for instance two ranges of mountains enclo- sing a valley, and by a very remarkable coincidence the iribe of Lsachar received for its lot, in the distribution of the land, the fertile and delightful vale of Esdraelon, lying between ranges of hills, in the peaceful and industrious oc- cupancy of which they might very justly be likened to an ass reposing between the sides of his stall. " Here, on this plain,^' says Dr. Clarke, " the most fertile part of all the land of Canaan, which, though a solitude, we found like one vast meadow covered with the richest pasture, the tribe of Issachar ' rejoiced in their tents.' " There is no authority whatever for rendering it "burdens," which seems to have been suggested solely by the words " couching between," as it was unnatural to suppose that if an ass couched betAveen any two objects, it would of course be between two bur- dens. But as the blessings of several of the other sons have respect to the geographical features of their destined in- heritance, it is natural to look for something of the same kind in that of Issachar, and viewed in this light the words yield a clear and striking sense, the appropriateness of which to the matter of fact is obvious to every eye. Chal. " Is- sachar rich in substance, and his possession shall be be- tween the bounds;" Syr. " Issachar, a gigantic man, lying down between the paths;" Targ. Jon. " He shall lie down between the limits of his brethren ;" Jerus. Targ. " and his boundary shall be situated between two limits." — " He saw that rest was good." Instead of interpreting this prediction with many commentators to the disparagement of Issachar, as though he were to be addicted to ignominious ease, we understand it in a sense directly the reverse, as intimating that he should have so high an esteem of the promised " rest" in another life, that he should give himself to unre- mitting labour in this; that he should be so intent upon " inheriting the earth" after the resurrection, the reversion of the saints, that he should willingly subject himself to toil, privation, and every species of endurance, with a view to secure the exceeding great reward. Thus his character would correspond with his name, the import of which is, " he shall bear or carry a reward." — Bush. Ver. 17. Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse-heels, so that his rider shall fall backward. The only allusion to this species of serpent, (the Cerastes, or horned snake,) in the sacred volume, occurs in the valedictory predictions of Jacob, where he describes the character and actions of Dan and his posterity : " Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder (ps'^Bir sephiphon) in the path, that biteth the horse's heels, so that his rider shall fall backward." It is indisputably clear, that the pa- triarch intended some kind of serpent ; for the circum- stances will not apply to a freebooter watching for his prey. It only remains to investigate the species to which it be- longs. The principal care of the Jewish writers, is to as- certain the etymology of the name, about which their sen- timents are much divided. The Arabian authors quoted by Bochart, inform us, that the Sephiphon is a most perni- cious reptile, and very dangerous to man. It is of a sandy colour, variegated with black and white spots. The par- ticulars in the character of Dan, however, agree better with the Cerastes, or horned snake, than with any other species of serpent. It lies in wait for passengers in the sand, or in the rut of the wheels on the highway. From its lurking-place, it treacherously bites the horse's heels, so that the rider falls backward, in consequence of the animal's hinder legs becoming almost immediately torpid by the dreadful activity of the poison. The Cerastes is equally formidable to man and the lower animals ; and the more dangerous, because it is not easy to distinguish him from the sand in which he lies ; and he never spares the helpless traveller who unwarily comes within his reach. " He moves," says Mr. Bruce, " with great rapidity, and in all directions, forward, backward, and sidewise. When he inclines to surprise any one who is too far from him, he creeps with his side towards the person, and his head avert- ed, till, judging his distance, he turns round, sj)rings upon him, and fastens upon the part next to him ; for it is no* true, what is said, that the Cerastes does not leap or spring I saw one of them at Cairo, crawl up the side of a box, ir. which there were many, and there lie still as if hiding himself, till one of the people who brought them to us, came near him, and though in a very disadvantngeous posture, sticking, as it were, perpendicular to the side of the box, he leaped near the distance of three feet, and fastened between Chap. 49. GENESIS. 51 the man's fore-finger and thumb, so as to bring the blood. The fellow showed no signs of either pain or fear : and we kept him ^ith us fall four hours, without applying any sort of remedy, or hi^ seeming inclined to do so. To make myself assured that the animal was in its perfect state, I made the man hold him by the neck, so as to force him to open his mouth, and lacerate the thigh of a pelican, a bird I had tamed, as big as a swan. The bird died in about thirteen minutes, though it was apparently affected in fifty seconds; and we cannot think it was a fair trial, because a very few minutes before, it had bit, and so discharged a part of its virus, and it was made to scratch the pelican by force, without any irritation or action of its own." These ser- pents have always been considered as extremely cunning, both in escaping^heir enemies and seizing their prey : they have even been called insidious ; a character which, frorh the preceding statement, they seem to deserve. The Orien- tals call him the Her in a-mbush ; for, in this manner, both the Seventy and Samaritan render the text in Genesis; and this appellation well agrees with his habits. Pliny says, that the Cerastes hides its whole body in the sand, leaving only its horns exposed, w^hich attract birds, who suppose them to be grains of barley, till they are undeceived, too late, by the darting of the serpent upon them. Ephraim, the Syrian, also mentions a kmd of serpents whose heads only are seen above the ground. Like the Cerastes, Dan was to excel in cunning and in artifice, to prevail against his enemies, rather by his policy in the cabinet than by his valour in the field. But all the Jewish expositors refer the words of Jacob to Samson, who belonged to that tribe, and was undoubtedly the most illustrious personage of whom they could boast. This remarkable man, Jehovah raised up to deliver his chosen people, not so much brhis valour, although his actions qlearly showed, that he was by no means deficient in personal courage, as by his artful and unexpected stratagems. This interpretation has been adopted by several Christian expositors; while it has been opposed by others as a needless refinement. It is unneces- sary, and perhaps improper, to restrict the prediction to Samson, when it can with equal propriety be applied to the whole tribe. Whether the words of Jacob, in this instance, were meant to express praise or blame, it may be diflicult to determine ; but, if the deceitful and dangerous character of the Cerastes, to which Dan is compared, be duly con- sidered, the latter is more probable. — Paxton. Ver. 22. Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well, whose branches run over the wall. To the northward and westward are several villages, interspersed with extensive orchards and vineyards, the latter of which are generally enclosed by high walls. The Persian vine-dressers do all in their power to make the vine run up the walls, and curl over on the other side, which they do by tying stones to the extremity of the ten- dril. The vine, particularly in Turkey and Greece, is fre- quently made to intwine on trellises, around a well, where, in the heat of the day, whole families collect themselves, and sit under the shade.— Morier. All this falls very naturally on an eastern ear. Joseph was the fruitful bough of Jacob, and being planted near a well, his leaf would not wither, and he would bring forth his fruit in his season. Great delight is taken in all kinds of creepers, which bear edible fruits, and the natives allow them to run over the walls and roofs of their houses. The term "branches" in the verse is in the margin rendered " daucrkters _;" and it is an interesting fact, {and one vMch will throw light on some other passages,) that the same term is used here to denote the same thing. " That man has only one Chede, i. e. branch, daughter." " The youngest Chede (branch) has got married this daj?' " Where are your branches V " They are all married." " What a young branch to be in this state !— how soon it has given fruit !" When a mother has had a large family, " That branch has borne plenty of fruit." A husband will say to his wife, who is steril, " Of what use is a branch which bears not fruit 1" The figure is much used in poetry. — Roberts. The people of Israel, and other oriental nations of those days, appear to have bestowed particular attention on the CTiitivation of the vine. The site of the vineyard was care- fully chosen m f.elds of a loose crumbling soil, on a rich plain, or on a sic ping hill rising with a gentle ascent ; or, where the acclivity was very steep, on terraces supported by masonry, and turned as much as possible from the setting sun. The plot was enclosed with a wall ; the stones and other encumbrances were removed, and the choicest plants were selected to form the plantation. Within the vineyard, low walls were sometimes raised for the purpose of supporting the vines ; a practice which seems to have been adopted before the days of Jacob ; for in the blessing of Joseph, he speaks of it in a manner which shows that it was quite familiar to the vine-dresser: "Joseph is a fruit- ful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well ; whose branches run over the wall." By this beautiful image then it appears, that while the dying patriarch justly appreciated and highly praised the admirable qualities of liis beloved son, he inti- mated to his family in the most delicate but significant manner, their obligation to Joseph for the protection and comfort they enjoyed under his government. — Paxton. Ver. 22. Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well, whose branches run over the wall: 23. The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him, and hated him. I have shown, in preceding observations, that vines in Judea sometimes grow against low stone walls ; but I do not apprehend the ingenious Mr. Barrington can be right, when he supposes, in a paper of his on the patriarchal customs and manners, that Joseph is compared to a vine growing against the wall, Gen. xlix. 22. As vines are sometimes planted against a low wall, they might possibly be planted against a low wall surrounding a well : though it IS difficult to guess, why a wall should be built round a well, in a vineyard, of such a height as to be proper for the support of a vine ; and if it were, why archers direct their arrows against it, when it would be so easy to gather the fruit by hand, without injury. But I suppose this is not an exact representation. In the first place, a vine is not mentioned; it is only a, fruitful tree, in general, to which Joseph is compared. Secondly, The being situated near water, is extremely conducive, in that dry and hot country, to the flourishing of vegetables in general ; and trees among the rest. " We came," says Maundrell, " to the fountain of Elisha. Close by the fountain grows a large tree, spreading into boughs over the water, and here in the shade we look a collation." A tree, we find, planted near plenty of water, grows there to a large size. Thirdly, the wild Arabs of those countries are great plunderers of fruit. Maillet assigns that as the reason why the fruit of the land of Egvpt, in these later times, is not better, namely, that they are wont to gather it before it is properly ripened, on account of the Arabs, who would otherwise rob them of it. Fourthly, It is very well known, that walls easily stop Arabs, who are continually on horseback in their roving about, and do not care to quit them, nor are used to climb walls. They had no better way then to get the fruit of those trees, whose luxuriant boughs ran over the walls of their enclosures, than by throwing their bludgeons at them, and gathering up the fruit that fell on the outside of the wall. To these things should be added. Fifthly, That the word translated arrotcs, means, not only those things that we are wont to call arrows, but such sticks as are throwii by the hand, as well as those missile weapons that are darted by means of a bow; for we find the word is made use of to express the staflf of a spear, 1 Sam. xvii. 7, and consequently any piece of wood long in proportion to its diameter, especially if used as a missile instrument. The lords of arrows nnn ^Sy^ baalee chitseem, for that is the Hebrew expression, conformable to an eastern mode of speech, which we translate archers, is a natural description of the wild Arabs, those lords of bludgeons, in committing their depredations on the eastern gardens and vineyards. But this manner of treating the vine would not be advan- tageous ; bunches of grapes are bv no means thus to be dislodged, and the fall would spoil the fruit. But there are other trees whose fruit might thus be gathered; among the rest, I suppose the pomegranate, whose fruit has so hard a shell, as neither to be injured by the fall, or destroyed by an accidental blow of the sticks^ they_ used for pelting the tree. The destroying a man is sometimes compared to the cutting down a tree :' " I knew not," said the Prophet Jere- 52 GENESIS, Chap. 50. miah, " that tiiey had devised devices against me, saying, Let us destroy the tree with the fruit thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered," Jer. xi. 19. But the envious brethren of Joseph did not imbrue their hands in his blood, they did not destroy liim as men destroy a tree when they cut it down, but they terribly distressed him ; they sold him for a slave into Egypt : he had flourished in the favour of his father and of his God, like a tree by a reservoir of water; but they for a time dishonoured him, as a tree is disgraced by the breaking its boughs, and knocking off its leaves, by the wild Arabs, who want to derive some advantage from battering it after this manner, when they cannot come at it to destroy it. — Harmer. Ver. 27. Benjamin shall raven as a wolf: in the mornings he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil. The wolf is weaker than the lion or the bear, and less courageous than the leopard; but he scarcely yields to them in cruelty and rapaciousness. So Benjamin, although not destitute of courage and address, nor disinclined to war, possessed neither the strength, nor the manly spirit of Judah, whose symbol was the lion's whelp ; but yet he was greedy of blood, and delighted in rapine ; and in the early periods of Jewish history, he distinguished himself by an active and restless spirit, which commonly, like the wolf among lambs and kids, spent itself in petty or inglorious v/arfare, although it sometimes blazed forth in deeds of heroic valour, and general utility. He had the honour of giving the second judge to the nation of Israel, who deliv- ered them from the oppressive yoke of Moab ; and the first king who sat on the tnrone of" that chosen people, whose valour saved them from the iron sceptre of Ammon, and more than once revenged the barbarities of the uncircum- cised Philistines upon their discomfited hosts. In the de- cline of the Jewish commonwealth, Esther and Mordecai, who were both of this tribe, successfully interposed with the King of Persia, for the deliverance of their brethren, and took their station in the first rank of public benefactors. But the tribe of Benjamin ravened like wolves, that are so ferocious as to de/our one another, when they desperately espoused the cause of Gibeah, and in the d.ishonourable and bloody feud, reduced their own tribe to the very brink of ruin, and inflicted a deep wound on the other members of the state. — Paxton. Chap. 50. ver. 10. And they came to the thresh- ing-floor of Atad, which is beyond Jordan ; and there they mourned with a great and very sore lamentation : and he made a mourning for his father seven days. See on chap. 45. 3. Ver. 26. So Joseph died, being a hundred and ten years old: and they embalmed him, and he was put in a coffin in Egypt. The people of the East do not in general put their dead in a coffin ; they simply fold up the corpse in a mat. When dying, the head is always placed towards the south, and in the grave also in the same direction. When a person is very ill, should another ask how he is, he will reply, " Ah ! his head is towards the south ;" meaning there is no hope. — Roberts. When Joseph died, he was not only embalmed, but put in a coffin. This was an honour appropriated to persons of distinction, coffins not being universally used in Egypt, Maillet, speaking of the Egyptian repositories of the dead, having given an account of several niches that are found there, says, " it must not be imagined that the bodies deposited in these gloomy apartments were all enclosed in chests, and placed in niches ; the greatest part were simply embalmed and swathed after that manner that every one hath some notion of; after which they laid them one by the side of another without any ceremony : some were even put into these tombs without any embalming at all, or such a slight one, that there remains nothing of them in the linen in which they were wrapped but the bones, and those half rotten." Antique cofl5ns of stone, and sycamore wood, are still to be seen in Egypt. It is said that some were formerly made of a kind of pasteboard, formed by folding and gluing cloth together a great number of times ; these were curiously plastered and painted with hieroglyphics.— Thevenot. 1 EXODUS. • Chap. 1. ver, 14. And they made their lives bit- j ter with hard bondage, in mortar, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field : all ' their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigour. Of a bad man it is said, in the East, " He makes the lives of his servants bitter." Also, " Ah! the fellow : the heart of his wife is made bitter," " My soul is bitter." " My heart is like the bitter tree." — Roberts. Ver. 16. And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools, if it be a son, then ye shall kill him ; but if it be a daughter, then she shall live. There have been great difficulties started in the nature and use of the instruments here rendered stools, (Heb. stones.) Ac- cording to the rendering of the established version, it would seem that they were designed for procuring a more easy delivery for women in labour. But besides that stone seats were obviously very unfit for such a purpose, the Hebrew word plainly signifies a vessel of stone for holding water, (Ex. vii. 19.) A far more probable interpretation, we think, is made out by referring the pronoun them, not to the moth- ers, but to the children. The sense of the passage would then be this : — " When ye see the new-born children, for the purpose of being washed, laid in the troughs or vessels of stone for holding water, ye shall destroy the boys." A passage from Thevenot seems to confirm this construction. " The kings of Persia are so afraid of being deprived of that power which they abuse, and are so apprehensive of being dethroned, that they destroy the children of their female relations, when they are brought to bed of boys, by putting them into an earthen trough, where they sufier them to starve ;" that is, probably, under pretence of preparing to wa,sh them, they let them pine away or destroy them in the water. — B. Ver. 19. And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women ; for they are lively, and are delivered ere the midwives come in unto them. Oriental women suflfer little from parturition ; for those of better condition are frequently on foot the day after de- livery, and out of all confinement on the third day. They seldom call midwives, and when they do, they are some- times delivered before they come to their assistance ; the poorer sort, while they are labouring or planting, go aside, deliver themselves, wash the child, lay it in a cloth, and return to work again. The same facility attended the He- brew women in Egypt; and the assertion of the midwives seems to have been literally true. — Paxton. Chap. 2. ver. 5. And the daughter of Pharaoh :;ame down to wash herself at the river ; and her maidens walked along by the river's side. All this is very natural. "Wherever there is a river, or a tank, which is known to be free from alligators, there fe- males go in companies to some retired place to bathe. There are so- many ceremonies, and so many causes for dejile- rnent, among the Hindoos, that the duty has often to be at- tended to. In the Scanda Purana, the beautiful daughter of Mougaly is described as going to the river with her maidens to bathe. — Roberts. Chap. 3. ver. 5. And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off th}?- shoes from off thy feet ; ifor the place whereon thou standest is holy ground. See on Gen. 14. 23. No heathen would presum-e to go on holy ground, or en- ter a temple, or any other sacred place, without first taking off" his sandals. Even native Christians, on entering a church or chapel, generally do the same thing. No res- pectable man would enter the house of another without having first taken oflf his sandals, which are generally left at the door, or taken inside by a servant. — Roberts. Chap. 7. ver. 1. And the Lord said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh : and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. A man who is afraid to go into the presence of a king, or a governor, or a great man, will seek an interview with the minister, or some principal character ; and should he be much alarmed, it will be said, " Fear not, friend ; I will make you as a god to the king." " What ! are you afraid, of the collector] fear not; you will be as a god to him." " Yes, yes, that upstart was once much afraid of the great ones ; but now he is like a god among them." — Roberts. Ver. 12. For they cast down every man his rod, and they became serpents: but Aaron's rod swallowed up their rods. The rods of the magicians were hardly travelling staves, but doubtless such as they bore by virtue of their office as priests and servants of God. The Roman augurs were, m the like manner, accustomed to carry a staff called li.- tures, which was crooked at the top, as described by Cice- ro {on Divination, b. i. chap. 17.) That these staves were a Roman invention, is improbable ; they were derived, like others of their sacred customs, from the religion of older nations. — Burder. Ver. 18. And the fish that is in the river shall die, and the river shall stink ; and the Egyp- tians shall loathe to drink of the water of the river. There are few wells in Egypt, but their waters are not drank, being unpleasant and unwholesome ; the water of the Nile is what they universally make use of in this coun- try, which is looked upon to be extraordinarily whole- some, and at the same time, extremely delicious. " The water of Egypt," says the Abbe Mascrier, " is so delicious, that one would not wish the heat should be less, nor to be delivered from the sensation of thirst. The Turks find it so exquisitely charming, that they excite themselves to drink of it by eating salt. It is a common saying among them, that if Mohammed had drank of it, he would have begged of God not to have died, that he might always have done it. They add, that whoever has once drank of it, he ought to drink of it a second time. This is what the peo- ple of the country told me, when they saw me return from ten years' absence. When the Egyptians undertake the pilgrimage of Mecca, or go out of their country on any other account, they speak of nothing but the pleasure they shall find at their return in drinking the Nile water. There is nothing to be compared to this satisfaction; it surpasses in their esteem that of seeing their relations again, and their families. Agreeably to this, all those that have tasted of this water allow that they never met with the like in any other place. In truth, when one drinks of it the first time, it seems to be some water prepared by art. It has something in it inexpressibly agreeable and pleasing to the taste ; and we ought to give it perhaps the same rank among waters, which champaigne has among wines. I must confess, however, it has, to my taste, too much sweet- ness. But its most valuable quality is, that it is infinitely salutary. Drink it in what quantities you will, it never ia 54 EXODUS. Chap. 8. theleast incommodes you. This is so true, that it is no un- common thing to see some persons drink three buckets of it in a day, without finding the least inconvenience. . . "When I give such encomiums to the water of Egypt, it is right to observe, that I speak only of that of the Nile, which indeed is the only water there which is drinkable. Well- water is detestable and unwholesome ; fountains are so rare, that they are a kind of prodigy in that country; and as for the rain-water, it would be in vain to attempt preserving that, jsince scarce any falls in Egypt." The embellishments of a Frenchman may be seen here, but the fact, however, in general is indubitable. A person that never before heard of this delicacy of the water of the Nile, and the large quantities that on that account, are drank of it, will, I am very sure, find an energy in those words of Moses to Pha- raoh, Exod. vii. 18, The Egyptian shall loathe to drink of the icater of the river ^ which he never observed before. They will loathe to drink of that water which they used to prefer to all the waters of the universe, loathe to drink of that which they had been wont eagerly to long for ; and will rather choose to drink of well-water, which is in their country so detestable. And as none of our commentators, that I know of, have observed this energy, my reader, I hope, will not be displeased that I have remarked it here. — Harmer. Ver. 19. And that there may be blood through- out all the land of Egypt, both in vessels of wood, and in vessels of stone. Perhaps these words do not signify, that the water that had been taken up into their vessels, was changed into blood. The water of the Nile is known to be very thick and muddy, and they purify it either by a paste made of almonds, or by filtrating it through certain pots of white earth, which is the preferable way, and therefore the pos- session of one of these pots is thought a great happiness. Now, may not the meaning of this passage be, that the wa- ter of the Nile should not only look red and nauseous, like blood in the river, but in their vessels too, when taken up in small quantities; and that no method whatever of puri- fying it should take place, but whether drank out of vessels of wood, or out of vessels of stone, by means of which they were wont to purge the Nile water, it should be the same, and should appear like blood 1 Some method must have .been used in very early days to clarify the water of the Nile ; the mere letting it stand to settle, hardly seems suffi- cient, especially if we consider the early elegance that ob- tained in Egypt. So simple an invention then as filtrating vessels may easily be supposed to be as ancient as the time of Moses ; and to them therefore it seems natural to sup- pose the threatening refers. — Harmer. The changing of the river into blood, in colour, I saw partially accomplished. For the first four or five days of the Nile's increase the waters are of a muddy red, owing to their being impregnated with a reddish coal in the upper country ; as this is washed away, the river becomes of a greenish yellow for four or five days. "When I first ob- served this, I perceived that the animalculse in the water were more numerous than at any other period ; even the Arabs Avould not drink the water without straining it through a rag : " And the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink of the water of the river." — Madden, Chap. 8. ver. 4. And the frogs shall come up, both on thee, and upon thy people, and upon all thy servants. This loathsome plague extended to every place, and to every class of men. The frogs came up and covered the land of Egypt; they entered into their houses, and into their bed-chambers ; they crawled upon their persons, upon their beds, and into their kitchen utensils. The whole country, their palaces, their temples, their persons — all was polluted and hateful. Nor was it in their power to wash away the nauseous filth with which they were tainted, for every stream and every lake was full of pollution. To a people who affected the most scrupulous purity in their persons, their habitations, and manner of living, nothing almost can be conceived more insufferable than this plague. The frog is, compared with many other reptiles, a harm- .^ss animal ; it neither injures by its bite nor by its poison ; but it must have excited on that occasion, a disgust which rendered life an almo-t insupportable burden. The eye was tormented with beholding the march of their impure legions, and the ear with hearing the harsh tones of their voices: the Egyptians could recline upon no bed where they were not compelled to admit their cold and filthy embrace ; thev tasted no food which was not infected by their touch ; and they smelled no perfume, but the foetid stench of their slime, or the putrid exhalations emitted from their dead carcasses. The insufl!erable annoyance of such insignificant creatures illustriously displayed the power of God, while it covered the haughty and unfeeling persecutors of his peo- ple with confusion, and filled them with utter dismay. How much the Egyptians endured from this visitation, is evident from the haste with which Pharaoh sent for Moses and Aaron, and begged the assistance of their prayers : " Entreat the Lord that he may take away the frogs from me and from my people; and 1 Avill let the people go that they may do sacrifice unto the Lord." Reduced to great extremity, and receiving no deliverance from the pretended miracles of his magicians, he had recourse to that God, concerliing whom he had so proudly demanded, " Who is Jehovah, that I should obey his voice to let Israel gol" Subdued and instructed by adversity, he implores his compassion, and acknowledges the glory of his name ; but, as the event proved, not with a sincere heart : " Then said Moses, Glory over me ;" an obscure phrase, which is ex- plained by the next clause, " when shall I entreat for thee 1" that is, according to some writers, although it belongs not to thee, Pharaoh, to prescribe to me the time of thy deliver- ance, which entirely depends on the will and pleasure of God alone ; yet I, who am a prophet, and the interpreter of his will, grant thee, in his name, the choosing of the time when this plague shall be removed. But this inter- pretation is more ingenious than solid. Moses intends ra- ther to suggest an antithesis between the perverse boasting of the proud monarch, and the pious glonation of the hum- bled penitent, who was now reduced to cry for mercy. Thus far, said Moses, thou hast trusted in thine own pow- er ; then, fascinated with the deceitful miracle of the ma- gicians, thou hast perversely exalted thyself against the God of heaven ; now rather glory that thou hast in me an intercessor with God, whose prayers for thy deliverance he will not refuse to hear : and in proof that he is the only true God, and that I bear his commission, fix thou the time of deliverance. " And he said. To-morrow, And he said. Be it according to thy word : that thou mayst know, that there is none like unto the Lord our God." To-morrow, said Pharaoh : but why not to-day 7 It was to be expected, that the vexed and humbled monarch would ask for instant relief. It is prob- able, the king had called Moses and Aaron in the evening, and that he durst not ask the promised deliverance on the same day, because he thought it was not to be obtained without inany prayers. Whatever might be the true reason of Pharaoh's procrastination, the renowned Calvin seems to have no ground for his opinion, that his only reason was, after obtaining his desire, to depart as formerly from his engagement to let the people go ; and that Moses, content with his promise, retired to intercede with Jehovah in his favour. That great man was persuaded, that the plague was immediately removed, not sufl^ered to continue till next day. It is better, however, to abide by the obvious mean- ing of the clear and precise terms used on that occasion, both by the king and the prophet: " and he said. To-mor- row. And he said. Be it according to thy word." Moses and Aaron, it is true, " went out from Pharaoh, and imme- diately cried unto the Lord, because of the frogs which he had brought against Pharaoh." But it is not said, the Lord immediately removed the plague ; but only, that he " did according to the word of Moses." Now, Moses had prom- ised relief next day, in the clearest terms, and we have every reason to suppose, that his intercession proceeded upon his promise ; therefore, when the Lord did according to the word of Moses, he removed the frogs on the next day. They were not, however, swept away, like the locusts which succeeded them, but destroyed, and left on the face of the ground. They were not annihilated, nor resolved into mud, nor marched back into the river, from whence they had come ; but left dead upon the ground, to prove the truth of the miracle, — that they had not died by the hands of men, but by the power of God ; that the great deliverance Chap. 9. EXODUS. 5.:> was not like the works of the magicians, a lying wonder, but a real interposition of almighty power, and an effect of divine goodness. The Egyptians were, therefore, reduced to the necessity of collecting them into heaps, which had the effect of more rapidly disengaging the putrid effluvia, and thus for a time, increasing ,jthe wretchedness of the country. Their destruction was probably followed by a pestilence, which cut off many of the people, in addition to those that died in consequence of the grievous vexations they endured from their loathsome adversaries ; for, in one of the songs of Ziou, it is said, " He sent frogs, which de- stroyed them ;" laid waste their lands, and infected them- selves wiih pestilential disorders. In another Psalm, the sweet singer of Israel brings the frogs which destroyed the Egyptians, from the land ; whereas, Moses avers, they were produced by the river : " Their land brought forth frogs in abundance, in the chambers of their kings;" but the differ- ence is only apparent, and may be easily reconciled ; for the Psalmist may be understood as referring, not to any kind of land, but to the miry soil on the banks, or the mud in the bottom of the river. But the truth is, he uses a term, which signifies a region or country, comprehending both land and water. His true meaning then is. Their land or country, of which the Nile is a part, brought forth frogs : lor the land of Egypt certainly produces whatever the Nile contains. Were it necessary to prove so clear a position, the words of Moses might be quoted, in which he reminds the people of Israel, that they came in the course of their journeyings to Jobath, a land of rivers ; and the sublime ascription of Habakkuk : " Thou didst cleave the earth with rivers." The sea itself, belongs as it were to the neighbouring countries ; for it is said, that Solomon con- structed a fleet " in the land of Edom;" that is, in the sea which washed the shores of Edom. It has been inquired, why David in the same passage says, the frogs penetrated into the chamber-s of their kings. The answer is easy : the plural is often used for the singu- lar in Hebrew : thus the Psalmist himself: " "We will go into his tabernacles ;" although there was but one taber- nacle where the people of Israel assembled for religious worship. The servants of Nebuchadnezzar accused the three children in these terms : " they do not worship thy gods," meaning only the golden image, which the king had set up in the plain of Dura. The language of David, there- fore, in the text under consideration, meant no more than the king's palace. Some interpreters propose another solu- tion : That the kingdom of Egypt was at that time divided into a number of small independent states, governed each by its own prince, and that all of them were equally sub- jected to the plague ; but although it must be granted that this country was in succeeding ages, divided into a number of small principalities, no evidence has been adduced in support of such a state of things in the time of Moses ; on the contrary, the whole tenor of his narrative leads to the opposite conclusion. Nor is it unreasonable to suppose, that the principal grandees of Egypt, many of whom were persons of great power and influence in the state, received from the royal Psalmist the title of kings ; it is certainly not more incongruous, than to give the title of princes to the merchants of Tyre ; or the title of kings to the princes of Assyria. The meaning of the j)assage then, is briefly this the potent monarch of Egypt, in the midst of his vas- sal ,>rinces, in the innermOvSt recesses of his palace, could find no means of defence against the ceaseless intrusion of the impure vermin which covered the face of his dominions, and equally infested the palaces of the rich, and the cottages of the poor ; the awful abode of the king, and the clay-built hovel of the mendicant. — Paxton. Ver. 9. And Moses said unto Pharaoh, Glory c^ver me : when shall I entreat for thee, and for thy servants, and for thy people, to destroy the frogs from thee and thy houses, that they may remain in the river only ? The margin has, for " glory," " honour," and for " over me," " against me." Pharaoh had besought Moses to pray that the Lord might take away the frogs, and Moses wish- ed the king to have the honour or glory (in preference to niraself) of appointing a time when he should thus pray to me Lord to take them awiy. This was not only compli- mentary to Pharaoh, but it would have a strong tendency to convince him that the Lord had heard the prayer of Mo- ses, because he himself had appointed the time. The Tamui translation* has this, " Let the honour be to you (or over me) to appoint a time when I shall pray." — Roberts, Ver. 16. And the Lord said unto Moses, Say unto Aaron, Stretch out thy rod, and smite the dust of the land, that it may become lice throug ■.• out all the land of Egypt. The learned have not been agreed in their opinion con- cerning the third of the plagues of Egypt: Exod. viii. 16, &c. Some of the ancients suppose that gTiats, or some an- imals resembling them, were meant ; whereas our transla- tors, and many of the moderns, understand the original word o-'jr ki7meem, as signifying lice. Bishop Patrick, m his commentary, supposes that Bochart has suflftciently proved, out of the text itself, that our version is right, since gnats are bred in fenny places, he might have said with truth, and with much greater energy of argument, in wa- ter, whereas the animals Moses here speaks of, were brought out of the dust of the earth. A passage I lately met with, in Vinisaur's account of the expedition of oiir King Richard the First into the Holy Lancf, may, perhaps, give a truer representation of this Egyptian plague, than those that suppose they were gnats, or those that suppose they were lice, that God used on that occasion, as the in- strument of that third correction. Speaking of the march- ing of that army of Croisaders, from Cayphas to where the ancient Caesarea stood, that writer informs us, that each night certain worms distressed them, commonly called tar- rentes, which crept upon the ground, and occasioned a very burning heat by most painful punctures. They hurt no- body in the day time, but when night came on they ex- tremely pestered them, being armed with stings, conveying a poison which quickly occasioned those that were wound- ed by them to swell, and was attended with the most acuto pains. — Harmer. Chap. 9. ver. 8. And the Lord said unto Moses and unto Aaron, Take to you handfuls of ashes of the furnace, and let Moses sprinkle it to- wards the heaven in the sight of Pharaoh. When the magicians pronounce an imprecation on ai. individual, a village, or a country, they take ashes of cow's dung, (or from a common fire,) and throw them in the air, saying to the objects of their displeasure, such a sickness, or such a curse, shall surely come upon you. — Roberts. Ver. 25. And the hail smote throughout all the land of Egypt all that was in the field, both man and beast ; and the hail smote every herb of the field, and brake every tree of the field. I do not apprehend that it is at all necessary to suppose, that all the servants, and all the cattle of the Egyptians, that were abroad at the time the hail fell, which Moses threatened, and which was attended with thunder and lightning, died ; it is sufficient to suppose they all felt the hailstones, and that several of them were killed. This was enough to justify the words of Moses, that it should be a " grievous hail, such as had not fallen before in Egypt from its foundation." For though it hails sometimes in Egypt as well as rains, as Dr. Pococke found it hailed at Fioume, when he was there in February; and thunders too, as Thevenot says it did one night in December, when he was at Cairo ; yet fatal effects are not wont to follow in that country, as appears from what Thevenot says of this thunder, which, he tells us, killed a man in the castle there, though it had never been heard before that thunder had killed anybody at Cairo. For divers people then to have been killed by the lightning and the hail, besides cattle, was an event that Moses might well say had never happened there before, from the time it began to be inhabited. I will * Which is made from the original ; and the genius of the language i3 every way more suited to the Hebrew, than ours. And nearly all the orientalisms in the marginal references of the English Bible are in* serted in the textoiitis Tamul translation. ft6 EXOD0S. Chaf. 10—11. » ©niy add, that Moses, by representing this as an extraordi- nary hail_ supposed that it did sometimes hail there, as it is found in fact to do, though not as in other countries : the not raining in Egypt, it is well known, is to be understood in the same manner. — Harmer. Chap. 10. ver. 11, Not so: go now ye that are men, and serve the Lord : for that ye did de- sire. And they were driven out from Pha- raoh's presence. Among natives of rank, when a person is very impor- tunate or troublesome, when he presses for something which the former are not willing to grant, he is told to begone. Should he still persist, the servants are called, and the order is given, " Drive that fellow out." He is then seized by the n£ck, or taken by the hamds, and dragged from the premises ; he all the time screaming and bawling as if they were taking his life. Thus to be driven out is the greatest indignity which can be offered, and nothing but the most violent rage will induce a superior to have recourse to it,— Roberts. Ver. 19. And the Lord turned a mighty strong west wind, which took away the locusts, and cast them into the Red Sea ; there remained not one locust in all the coasts of Egypt. It was not the purpose of God to complete every punish- ment at once, but to carry on these judgments in a series, and by degrees to cut off all hopes, and every resource upon which the Egyptians depended. By the hail and thunder and fire mingled with rain, both the flax and barley were entirely ruined, and their pastures must have been greatly injured. The wheat and rye were not yet in ear; and such was the fertility of the soil in Egypt, that a T-ery short time would have sufficed for the leaves of the trees, and the grass of the field, to have been recruited. To complete, therefore, these evils, it pleased God to send a host of locusts, to devour every 1-eaf and blade of grass, which had been left in the former devastation, and what- ever was beginning to vegetate. It is hard to conceive how v/ide the mischief extends, when a cloud of these insects comes upon a country. They devour to the very root and bark, so that it is a long time before vegetation can be renewed. How dreadful their inroads at all times were, may be known from a variety of authors, both ancient and modern. They describe them as being brought by one wind, and carried off by another. They swarm greatly in Asia and Africa. In respect to Europe, Theve- not tells us, that the region upon the Boristhenes, and particularly that inhabited by the Cossacks, is greatly infested with locusts, especially in a dry season. They come in vast clouds, which extend fifteen and sometimes eighteen miles, and are nine to twelve in breadth. The air, by their interposition, is rendered quite obscure, how- ever bright the day may have been before. In two hours they devour all the corn, where-.^er they settle, and often a famine ensues. At night, when they repose upon the earth, the ground is covered with them four inches deep, or more : and if a carriage goes over them, and they are mashed under foot, the smell of them is scarcely to be borne, especially when they are reduced to a state of putrefaction. They come from Circassia, Mingrelia, and Tartary, on which account the natives rejoice in a north or northeast wind, which carries them into the Black Sea, where they perish. The vast region of Asia, especially the southern part, is liable to their depredations. China is particularly infested with them; and the natives use various means to obviate the evil, which is generally too powerful to be evaded. But the most fearful account's are from Africa, where the heat of the climate, and the nature of the soil in many places, contribute to the production of these animals in astonishing numbers.— Burder. Ver. 21, And the Lord said unto Moses, Stretch out thy hand towards heaven, that there may be darkness over the land of Egypt, even dark- ness which may be felt. When the magicians deliver their predictions, they stretch forth the right hand towards heaven, to show that they have power, and that God favours them. The Tamul translation has this, " darkness which causeth to feel;" i. e. so dark that a man is obliged to feel for his way, and untii he shall have so felt, he cannot proceed. Thus the dark- ness was so great, that their eyes were not ol aiij use j they were obliged to grope for their way. — Roberts. [This is probably a correct view of the passage, as a darkness consisting of thick clammy fogs, of vapours and exhalations so condensed as to be perceived by the organs of touch, would have extinguished animal life in a few Moments.] — B. Ver, 28, And Pharaoh said unto him. Get thee from me, take heed to thyself, see my face no more : for in that day thou seest my face, thou shalt die. Has a servant, an agent, or an officer, deeply offended his superior, he will say to him, " Take care never to see my face again ; for on the day you do that, evil shall come up- on you." " Begone, and m future never look in this face" pointing to his own. — Roberts, Chap. 11. ver. 2, Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neigh- bour, and every woman of her neighbour, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold. Dr, Boothroyd, instead of borrow, translates "ask." Dr. A. Clarke says, " request, demand, require." The Israel- ites wished to go three days' journey into the wilderness, that they might hold a feast unto the Lord. When the Orientals go to their sacred festivals, they always put on their best jewels. Not to appear before the gods in such a way, they consider would be disgraceful to themselves and displeasing to the deities. A person, whose clothes or jewels are indifferent, will borrow of his richer neigh- bours ; and nothing is more common than to see poor peo- ple standing before the temples, or engaged in sacred cere- monies, well adorned with jewels. The almost pauper bride or bridegroom at a marriage may often be seen deck- ed with gems of the most costly kind, which have been borrowed for the occasion. It fully accords, therefore, with the idea of what is due at a sacred or social feast, lo be thus adorned in their best attire. Under these circum- stances, it would be perfectly easy to borrow of the Egyp- tians their jewels, as they themselves, in their festivals, would doubtless wear the same things. It is also recorded, the Lord gave them " favour in the sight of the Egj^ptians." It does not appear to have been fully known to the He- brews, that they were going finally to leave Eg}'pt: they might expect to return; and it is almost certairi that, if their oppressors had known they were not to return, they would not have lent them their jewels. The Lord, however, did say to Moses, in chap, iii, 11., that He would " bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt," and that they should worship Him upon that moun- tain ; but whether Moses fully understood Him is not cer- tain. But the Lord knew ! — certainly He did. And as a father, or a master, who saw his children, or slaves, de- prive each other of their rightful pay, (as the Egyptians did the Israelites,) had a right to give to the injured what they had been unjustly deprived of: so the Lord, in whose hands are all things, who daily takes from one, and gives to an- other; and who builds up, or destroys, the families of the earth ; would have an undoubted right to give to the He- brews that property of which the Egyptians had so unjustly and cruelly deprived them. — Roberts. Ver. 5, And all the first-born in the land of Egypt shall die, from the first-born of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the first-born of the maid-servant that is behind the mill ; and all the first-born of beasts. In the first ages, they parched or roasted their grain ; a practice which the people of Israel, as we learn from the scriptures, long continued ; afterward they pounded it in a mortar, to which Solomon thus alludes : " Though thou shouldst bray a fool in a mortar among wheat, with a pes^ Chap. 12. EXODUS. 57 tie, yet will not his foolishness depart from him." This was succeeded by mills, similar to the handmills formerly used in this country; of which there were two sorts: the first were large, and turned by the strength of horses or asses : the second were smaller, and wrought by men, commonly by slaves condemned to this hard labour, as a punishment for their crimes. Chardin remarks in his manuscript, that the persons employed are generally female slaves, who are least regarded, or are least fit for any thing else : for the work is extremely laborious, and esteemed the lowest em- ployment about the house. Most of their corn is ground by these little mills, although they sometimes make use of large mills, wrought by oxen or camels. Near Ispahan, and some of the other great cities of Persia, he saw water- mills ; but he did not meet with a single windmill in the East. Almost every family grinds their wheat and barley at home, having two portable millstones for that purpose; ' of which the uppermost is turned round by a small handle of wood or iron, that is placed in the rim. When this stone is large, or expedition is required, a second person is called' in to assist ; and as it is usual for the women only to be '( concerned in this employment, who seat themselves over ) against each other, with the millstone between them, we I may see the propriety of the expression in the declaration ; of Moses: " And all the first-born in the land of Egypt shall die, from the first-born of Pharaoh, that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the first-born of the maid-servant, that is behind the mill." The manner in which the hand- mills are worked, is well described by Dr. Clarke : " Scarce- ly had we reached the apartment prepared for our recep- i tion, when looking from the window, into the courtyard belonging to the house, we beheld two women grinding at ! the mill, in a manner most forcibly illustrating the saying 1 of our Saviour : ' Two women shall be grinding at the i mill, the one shall be taken and the other left.' They were I preparing flour to make our bread, as it is always cusiom- j ary in the country when strangers arrive. The two women, I seated upon the ground opposite to each other, held between them two round flat stones, such as are seen in Lapland, and such as in Scotland are called querns. In the centre ©f the upper stone was a cavity for pouring in the corn; ! and by the side of this, an upright wooden handle for mov- j ing the stone. As this operation began, one of the women opposite received it from her companion, who pushed it i towards her, who again sent it to her companion; thus || communicating a rotatory motion to the upper stone, their I left hands being all the while employed in supplying fresh I corn, as fast as the bran and flour escaped from the sides of the machine."-PAXTON. Chap. 12. ver. 11, And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand: and ye shall eat it in haste ; it is the Lord's passover. When people take a journey, they have always their I loins well girded, as they believe that they can walk much ' faster and" to a greater distance. Before the palankeen *>earers take up their load, they assist each other to make tight a part of the sali or robe round the loins. When men are about to enter into an arduous undertaking, bystanders sav, " Tie your loins loell up J' (Luke xii. 35. Eph. vi. 4. 1 Pet. i. 13.)— Roberts. They that travel on foot are obliged to fasten their gar- ments at a greater height from their feet than they are wont to do at other times. This is what some have under- stood to be meant by the girding their loins : not simply their having girdles about them, but the wearing their gar- ments at a greater height than usual. There are two ways of doing this. Sir J. Chardin remarks, after having inform- ed us that the dress of the eastern people is a long vest, leaching down the calf of the leg, more or less fitted to the b idy, and fastened upon the loins by a girdle, which goes three or four times round them. " This dress is fastened hi2;her up two ways: the one, which is not much used, is to draw up the vest above the girdle, just as the monks do when they travel on foot ; the other, which is the common way, is to tuck up the foreparts of their vest into the girdle, and so fasten them. All persons in the East that journey on foot always gather up their vest, by which they walk viiore commodiously, having the leg and knee unburdened did unembarrassed by the vest, which they are not when i 8 that hangs over them." And after Ibis manner he supposes the Israelites were prepared for their going out of Egypt, when they ate the first passover, Exod. xii. 11. He takes notice, in the same passage, of the singularity of their hav ing shoes en their feet at that repast. They in common, h'% observes, put otf their shoes when they eat, for which h«' assigns two reasons: the one, that as they do not use tables and chairs in the East, as in Europe, but cover their floors with carpets, they might not soil those beautiful pieces of furniture ; the other, because it would be troublesome to keep their shoes upon their feet, they sitting crosslegged on the floor, and having no hinder quarters to their shoes, which are made like slippers. He takes no notice in this note, of their having to eat this passover with a staff" in their hand ; but he elsewhere observes, that the eastern people very universally make use of a staflf when they journey on foot; and this passage plainly supposes it. — EIatimer. Ver. 34. And the people took their dough before it was leavened, their kneading-troughs being bound up in their clothes upon their shoulders. The dough, we are told, which the Israelites had prepared for baking, and on which it should seem they subsisted af- ter they left Egypt for a month, was carried away by them in their kneading-troughs on their shoulders, Exod. xii. 34. Now, an honest thoughtful countryman, who knows how cumbersome our kneading-troughs are, and how much less important they are than many other utensils, maybe ready to wonder at this, and find a difficulty in accounting for it. But this wonder perhaps may cease, when he comes to un- derstand, that the vessels which the Arabs of that country make use of, for kneading the unleavened cakes they pre-, pare for those that travel in this very desert, are only small wooden bowls ; and that they seem to use no other in their own tents for that purpose, or any other, these bowls being used by them for kneading their bread, and afterward serving up their provisions when cooked : for then it will appear, that nothing could be more convenient than kneading-troughs of this sort for the Israelites, in their journey. I am, however, a little doubtful, whetlier these were the things that Moses meant by that word which our version renders kneading-troughs ; since it seems to me, that the Israelites had made a provision of corn sufficient for their consumption for about a month, and that they were preparing to bake all this at once : now their own little wooden bowls, in which they were wont to knead the bread they wanted for a single day, could not contain all this dough, nor could they well carry a number of these things, borrowed of the Egyptians for the present occasion, with them. That they had furnished themselves with corn sufficient for a month, appears from their not wanting bread till they came into the wilderness of Sin ; that the eastern people commonly bake their bread daily, as they want it, appears from an observation I have already made, and from the history of the patriarch Abraham ; and that they were preparing to bake bread sufficient for this pur- pose at once, seems most probable, from the universal bus- tle they were in, and from the much greater conveniences for baking in Egypt than in the wilderness, w^hich are such, that though Dr. Shaw's attendant sometimes baked in the desert, he thought fit, notwithstanding, to carry bis- cuit with him, and Thevenot the same. They could not well carry such a quantity of dough in those wooden bowls, which they used for kneading their bread in com- mon. What is more. Dr. Pococke tells us, that the Arabs actually carry their dough in something else : for, after having' spoken of their copper dishes put one within an- other, and their wooden bowls, in which they make their bread, and which make up all the kitchen furniture of an Arab, even where he is settled ; he gives us a description of a round leather coverlet, which they lay on the ground, and serves them to eat off", which, he says, has rings round it, by which it is drawn together with a chain that has a hook to it to hang it by. This is drawn together, he says, and sometimes they carry in it their meal made into dough ; and in this manner they bring it full of bread, and, when the repast is over, carry it away at once, with all that is left. Whether this utensil is rather to be understood by the word ni-KK'n misharoth, translated hieading-t roughs, than the Arab wooden bowl, I leave my reader to determine. I would only remark, that there is nothing, in the other three 58 EXODUS. Chap. 13—15. places, in which the word occurs, to contradict this expla- nation. These places are Exod. viii. 3, Deut. xxviii. 5, 17, in the two last of which places it is translated store. It is more than a little astonishing, to find Grotius, in his com- ment on Exod. xii. 31), explaining that verse as signifying, that they baked no bread in their departing from Egypt, but stayed till they came to Succoih, because they had not time to stay till it was leavened in Egypt ; when it is cer- tain that they were so hurried out of Egypt, as to be desired not to stay to bake unleavened bread; nor can we imagine they would stay till leaven put into it at Succoth, had pro- duced its eifect''in their dough, since travellers now in that desert often eat imleaveaed bread, and the precepts of Mo- ses, relating to their commemoration of their going out of Egypt, suppose they ate unleavened bread for some time. Succoih, the first station then of the Israelites, which Dr. Shaw supposes was nothing more than some considerable encampment of Arabs, must have been a place where there was a considerable quantity of broom, or other fuel, which is not to be found in that desert everywhere.— Harmbr. Chap. 13. ver. 18. But God led the people about, . through the way of the wilderness of the Red Sea : and the children of Israel went up har- nessed out of the land of Egypt. The margin of our translation remarks, that the word rendered harnessed, in Exodus xiii. 18, signifies hj fives, hui when it adds, five in a rank, it seems to limit the sense of the term very unnecessarily, as it may as well signify five men in a company, or their cattle tied one to another in strings of five each. If there were 600,000 footmen, be- 'sides children, and a mixed multitude, together with cattle, the marching of five only abreast, supposing only one yard for each rank to move in, would make the whole length of this enormous file of people more than sixty-eight miles. If we should suppose two such columns, and place the chil- dren, mixed multitude, and cattle between them, the length then of this body of people would be above thirty-four miles. At the same time we cannot conceive any reason for such a narrow front, on the one hand, in such a wide desert, nor, on the other, why they are described as march- ing five abreast, if there were many such columns. It would seem in such a case, to be a circumstance that re- quired no particular notice. Pitts tells us, that in the march of the Mohammedan pilgrims from Egypt, through this very desert, they travel with their camels tied four in a parcel, one after the other, like so many teams. He says also that usually three or four of the pilgrims diet together. If we will allow that like circumstances naturally produce like eflfects, it will appear highly probable, that the meaning of the word used in the passage of Exodus is, that they went up out of Egypt with their cattle, in strings of five each ; or that Moses ordered that five men with their families should form each a little company, that should keep together, and assist each other, in this difficult march. In either of these senses we may understand the term, in all the other places in which it appears; whereas it is not natural to suppose they all went out of Egypt properly armed for war, and it is idle to say, as some have done, that they were girded about the loins, that is always supposed to be done by the eastern people when they journey. Not to say that the kindred word continually signifies five, and this word should in course signify that they were, somehow or other, formed into fives, companies of five men each, or companies that had e.B,c\y five beasts, which carried their provisions and Other necessaries, fastened to each other. — Harmer. Chap. 15. var. 20. And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand ; and all the women went out after her with tim- brels and nih. dances. Lady M, W. Montague, speaking of the eastern dances, says, "Their manner is certainly the same that Diana is said to have dance 1 on the banks of Eurotas. The great lady still leads the dance, and is followed by a troop of j-^oung girls, who indlate her steps, and if she sings, make iip the chorus. Th(i tunes are extremely gay and lively, yet with something ii them wonderfnllv soft. Their steps arc varied according to the pleasure of her that leads the dance, but always in exact time, and infinitely more agree- able than any of our dances." {Letters, vol, ii. p. 45.) This gives us a difierent apprehension of the meaning' of these words than we should otherwise form. " Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand, and all the women went out after her, with timbrels and dances." She led the dance, and they imitated her steps, which were not conducted by a set well-known form, but extemporaneous. Probably David did not dance alone before the Lord when the ark was removed, but led the dance in the same authoritative kind of way. (2 Sam. vi. 14, Judges xi, 34, 1 Sam, xviii, 6.) — Burcer. Ver. 25. And he cried unto the Lord ; and the Lord showed him a tree, which when he had cast into the waters, the waters were made sweet : there he made for them a statute and an ordinance, and there he proved them. This water, which was bitter or brackish, (Dr. Shaw says the latter,) was thus made sweet by the casting in of the tree. Some suppose it was a bitter wood, such as quassia, which corrected the water. Water is often brack- ish in the neighbourhood of salt-pans or the sea, and the natives correct it by throwing in it the wood called Perrao- Nelli, Phylanthus Emblica. Should the water be very bad, they line the well with planks cut out of this tree. In swampy grounds, or when tnere has not been rain for a long time, the water is often muddy, and very unwhole- some. But Providence has again been bountiful by giving to the people the Teatta Maram, Strychnos Potatorum, All who live in the neighbourhood of such water, or who have to travel where it is, always carry a supply of the nuts of this tree. They grind one or two of them on the side of an earthen vessel : the water is then poured in, and the impurities soon subside. — Roberts, " Ei-vah is a large village or town, thick planted with E aim-trees ; the Oasis Parva of the ancients, the last m- abited place to the west that is under the jurisdiction of Egypt ; it yields senna and coloquintida. The Arabs call* El-vah, a shriib or tree, not unlike our hawthorn, either in form or flower. It was of this wood, they say, that Moses' rod was made, when he sweetened the waters ol" Marah. With a rod of this wood too, they say, Kaled Ibn el Waalid, the great destroyer of Christians, sweetened these waters at El-vah, once bitter, and gave it the name from this miracle. A number of very fine springs burst from the earth at El-vah, which renders this small spot verdant and beautiful, though surrounded with dreary deserts on every quarter : it is situated like an island in the midst of the ocean." (Bruce.) — Our colonists, who first peopled some parts of America, corrected the qualities of the water they found there, by infusing in it branches of sassafras ; and it is understood that the first inducement of the Chinese to the general use of tea, was to correct the water of their rivers. That other water also stands in some need of cor- rection, and that such correction is applied to it, appears from the custom of Egypt, in respect to the water of the Nile. " The water of the Nile," says Niebuhr, " is always somewhat muddy; but by rubbing with bitter almonds, prepared in a particular manner, the earthen jars in which It is kept, this water is rendered clear, light, and salutary," — Burder. We travelled, says Burckhardt, over uneven, hilly ground, gravelly and flinty. At one hour and three quarters, we passed the well of Howara, around which a few date-trees grow. Niebuhr travelled the same route, but his guides probably did not lead him to this well, which Hes among hills about two hundred paces out of the road. The water of the well of Howara is so bitter, that men cr i,not drink it ; and even camels, if not very thirsty, refuse to taste it. This well Burckhardt justly supposes to be the Marah of the Israelites; and in this opinion Mr. Leake, Gesenius, and Rosenmiiller, concnr. From Ayoun Mousa to the well of Howara we had travelled fifteen hours and a quar- ter. Referring to this distance, it appears probable that this i, the desert of three days mentioned in the scriptures to have been crossed by the Israelites immodiaiely after their passing the Red Sea; and at the end of Avhich they arrived at Marah. In moving with a whole nation, the march may well be supposed to have occupied three daysj Chap, lb EXODUS. 59 and the fc.t'er well at Marah, which was sweetened by Mo- ses, corresponds exactly to that at Howara. This is the usual route to Mount Sinai, and was probably, therefore, li'.at which the Israelites took on their escape from Egypt, j)rovided it be admitted that they crossed the sea at Suez, a.s Niebuhr, with good reason, conjectures. There is no other road of three days' march in the way from Suez to- wards Sinai, nor is there any other well absolutely bitter on the whole of this coast. The complaint of the bitterness of the water by the children of Israel, who had been accus- tomed to the sweet water of the Nile, are such as may be daily heard from the Egyptian servants and peasants^^rho travel in Arabia. Accustomed from their youth to the ex- cellent water of the Nile, there is nothing which they so much regret in countries distant from Egypt; nor is there aiiv eastern people who feel so keenly the want of good v.aier, as the present natives of Egypt. With respect to the i;ieans employed by Moses to render the waters of the well su eet, I have frequently inquired among the Bedouins in d liferent parts of Arabia, whether they possessed any means I'f effecting such a change, by throwing wood into it, or by i\uy other process; but 1 never could learn that such an ii!i was known. At the end of three hours we reached Wady Gharendel, which extends to the northeast, and is almost a mile in breadth, and full of trees. The Arabs told me that it may be traced through the whole desert, and that it begins at no great distance from El Arysh, on the i Mediterranean ; but I had no means of ascertaining the truth of this statement. About half an hour from the place where we halted, in a southern direction, is a copious spfing, with a small rivulet, which renders the valley the J)rincipal station on this route. The water is disagreeable, and if kept for a night in the water skins, it turns bitter and spoils, as I have myself experienced, having passed this way three times. If, now, we admit Bir Howara to be the Marah of Exodus, (xv. 23,) then Wady Gharendel is prob- ably Elim, with its well and date-trees ; an opinion enter- tained by Niebuhr, who, however, did not see the bitter well of Howara. The non-existence, at present, of twelve wells at Gharendel, must not be considered as evidence against the just-stated conjecture ; for Niebuhr says, that his companions obtained water here by digging to a very small depth, and there was great plenty of it when I passed. Water, in fact, is readily found* by digging, in every fertile valley in Arabia, and wells are thus easily formed, which are filled up agam by the sands. The Wady Gharendel contains date-trees, tamarisks, acacias of different species, and the thorny shrub Gharkad, the Pegan-um retusum of Forskal, which is extremely com- Imon in this peninsula, and is also met with in the sands of the Delta on the coast of the Mediterranean. Its small 'red berry, of the size of a grain of a pomegranate, is very juicy ancl refreshing, much resembling a ripe gooseberry m taste, but not so sweet. The Arabs are very fond of it. The shrub Gharkad delights in a sandy soil, and reaches its maturity in the height of summer, when the ground is parched up, exciting an agreeable surprise in the traveller, at finding so juicy a berry produced in the driest soil and season. Might not the berry of this shrub have been used by Moses to sweeten the waters of Marah 1 [The Hebrew in Ex. XV. 25, reads : " And the Lord showed him a tree, and he cast into the waters, and they became sweet." The Aiabic translates, " and he cast of it into the waters," &c.] As this conjecture did not occur to me when I was on the spot, I did aot inquire of the Bedouins, whether they ever Sweetened the water with the juice of berries, which would pr iuably effect this change in the same manner as the juice Of pomegranate grains expressed into it. — Calmet. Chap. 16. ver. 13. And it came to pass, tliat at even the quails came up, and covered the camp ; and in the morning- the dew lay round about the host. Tt is evident from the history of Moses, that the demands of Israel were twice supplied with quails by the miraculous interposition of divine providence. The "first instance is recorded in the book of Exodus, and is described in these words ; *' I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel : speak unto them, saying. At even ye shall eat flesh, and in the morning ye shall be filled with bread ; and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God. And it came to pass, that at even the quails came up, and covered the camp." From these words it appears, that the quails were sent to supply the wants of the people, at the same time the manna began to be showered down from heaven, around their encampment in the desert of Sin ; and it is clear, from the beginning of the chapter, that this event took place soon after their departure from Egypt, upon the fifteenth day of the second month, before they came to mount Sinai. This miracle was repeated at Kibroth-hattaavah, a place three days' journey beyond the desert of Sinai ; but they struck their tents before Sinai, in the second year after their de- parture from Egypt, on the twentieth day of the second month; so that a whole year intervened between the first and second supply. In the first instance, the quails were scattered about the camp only for one day; but in the sec- ond, they came up from the sea for a whole month. They only covered the camp at their first appearance ; but when they came the second time, they lay round about it to the distance of a day's journey. No signs of divine wrath at- tended the first miracle; but the second was no sooner wrought, than the vengeance of their offended God over- took these incorrigible sinners : " While the flesh was yet between their teeth, ere it was chewed, the wrath of the Lord was kindled against the people ; and the Lord smote the people with a very great plague." Hence it is evident, that the sacred historian records two different events.; of which, the one was more stupendous than the other, and seemed to Moses so extraordinary, that on receiving the divine promise, he could not refrain from objecting : " The people, among whom I am, are six hundred thousand foot- men; and thou hast said, I will give them flesh, that they may eat a whole month. Shall the flocks and the herds be slain for them to sufllice them 1 Or shall all the fish of the sea be gathered together for them to suffice themi" Moses had seen the power of Jehovah successfully exerted in feeding his people with flesh for one day; but he could scarcely imagine, from whence supplies of the same kind could be drawn for a whole month. That eminent servant of Jehovah, astonished at the greatness of the promised favour, seemed to forget for a moment, that with God all things are possible. The quails were scattered around the camp of Israel, in the most astonishing numbers : " He rained flesh also upon them as dust, and feathered fowls like as the sand of the sea." The holy Psalmist had used the metaphorical word to rain, in relation to the manna, in a preceding verse, both to intimate its descent from heaven, and its prodigious abundance. And because a single metaphor is not sufli- cient to give us a just idea of the sudden and extraordinary supplies which descended on the tents of Israel, they are compared to the dust of the field, and to the sand of the sea, which cannot be numbered. To suggest at once the count- less myriads of these birds, and the ease with which they are caught, it is added : " He let it fall in the midst of their camp round about their habitations." The account of Moses is still more striking. " And there went forth a wind from the Lord, and brought quails from the sea, and let them fall by the camp, as it were a day's journey on this side, and as it were a day's journey on the other side, round about the camp, and as it were two cubits high upon the face of the earth." Hence, these birds covered the whole camp and the surrounding waste, to the distance of a day's journey on every side. The only ambiguity lies in the phrase, "a day's journey ;" whether it means the space over which an individual could travel in one day, in which case it would be much greater — or the whole army could traverse, which would be much less. If the journey of an individual is in- tended, it might be about thirty rniles; but if the sacred historian refers to the whole army, a third part of this space is as much as they could march in one day in the sandy desert, under a vertical sun. In the opinion of Bo- chart, this immense cloud of quails covered a space of at least forty miles diameter ; for a day's journey is at least twenty miles. Ludolf thinks, it ought to be reduced to six- teen miles ; and others, to half that number, because, Moses refers to the march of Israfel through the desert, encumber- ed with their women and children, their flocks and herds, and the baggage of the whole nation; which must have greatly retarded their movements, and rendered the short distance of eight miles more than sufficient for a journey of one day. It is equally doubtful, whether the distance mentioned by Moses, must be measured from the centre, or J^... 50 EXODUS. Chap. 16 from the extremities of the encampment; it is certain, however, that he intends to state the countless nmnbers of these birds which fell around the tents of Israel. Some interpreters have doubted, whether the next clause refer to the amazing multitude of these birds which strewed the desert, or to the facility with which they were caught ; the wind let them fall by the camp — " as it were two cubits high upon the face of the earth." The Seventy, and after them the Vulgate, render it, They flew, as it were two cu- bits high above the earth. Others imagine, the quails were piled one above another over all that space, to the height of two cubits; while others suppose, that the heaps which were scattered on the desert with vacant spaces between, for the convenience of those that went forth to collect them, rose to the height of two cubits. The second opinion seems entitled to the preference ; for the phrase " to rain," evi- dently refers to these birds after they had fallen to the ground, upon which they lay Numerous as the drops of rain from the dense cloud. Besides, the people could scarcely have gathered ten homers a piece, in two days, if they had not found the quails lying upon the ground ; for a homer is the largest measure among the Jews, and contains nearly six pints ; according to some Hebrew writers, the load of an ass, from whose name the term is supposed to be deriv- ed. — Paxton. V'er. 15. And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another, It is manna ; for they wist not what it was. And Moses said unto them, This is the bread which the Lord hath given you to eat. "We cannot mistake in this description the natural pro- duction which is called, in all the European languages, manna. Manna is the common name for the thick, clam- ray, and sweet juice, which in the southern countries oozes from certain trees and shrubs, partly by the rays of the sun, partly by the puncture of some kinds of insects, and partly by artificial means. The manna common in our druggists' shops, comes from Calabria and Sicily, where it oozes out of a kind of ash-tree, from the end of June to the end of July, when the bicada appears, an insect at first sight resembling the locust, but is distinguished from it by a thorn under the belly, with which it punctures this tree. The juice issuing from this wound, is in the night fluid, and looks like dew, but in the morning it begins to harden. But the European manna is not so good as the oriental, which is gathered in particular in Syria, Arabia, and Persia ; partly from the oriental oak, and partly from a shrub, which is called in Persia, Terengabin or Terendschabin. Rauwolf says, that the manna grains resemble coriander seeds, as mentioned in the Mosaic account ; and this is confirmed by several modern travellers. Gmelin remarks, that the manna is as white as snow, and consists of grains like coriander seeds. The peasants about Ispahan gather it at sunrise, holding a sieve under the branch, into which the grains fall when the branches are struck with a stick ; if the gathering it be put off" till after sunrise, no manna can be obtained, because it melts. — BuRDER. The Wady el Sheikh, the great valley of western Sinai, is in many parts thickly overgrown with the tamarisk or tarfa, {Hedysarun ALJiagi of Linn.) It is the only valley in 'he peninsula of Sinai where this tree grows, at present, in any great quantity; though small bushes of it are here and here met with in other parts. It is from the tarfa that the .nanna is obtained. This substance is called by the Be- douins mann, and accurately resembles the description of manna given in the scriptures. In the month of June, it drops from the thorns of the tamarisk upon the fallen twigs, ?eaves, and thorns which always cover the ground beneath that tree in the natural state ; the manna is collected before sunrise, when it is coagulated ; but it dissolves as soon as the sun shines upon it. The Arabs clean away the leaves, dirt, etc. which adhere to it, boil it, strain it through a coarse piece of cloth, and put it in leathern skins : in this way they preserve it till the following year, and use it as they (io ho- ney, to pouroverunleavened bread, orto dip theirbread into. I could not learn that they ever made it intocakes or loaves. The manna is found only in years when copious rains have fallen ; sometimes it is not produced at all. I saw none of it among the Arabs, but I obtained a small piece of the last year's produce, in the convent (of Mount Sinai,) where, having been kept in the cool shade and moderate tempera, ture of that place, it had become quite solid, and formed a small cake ; it became soft when kept some time in the hand ; if placed in the sun for five minutes, it dissolved ; but when restored to a cool place, it became solid again in a quarter of an hour. In the season at which the Arabs gather it, it never acquires that state of hardness which will allow of its being pounded, as the Israelites are said to have done, in Num. xi. 8. Its colour is a dirty yellow, and the piece which I saw was still mixed with bits of tamarisk leaves ; its taste is agreeable, somewhat aromatic, and as sweet as honey. If eaten in any considerable quantity, it is said to be slightly purgative. The quantity of manna collected at present, even in sea- sons when the most copious rains fall, is trifling, perhaps not amounting to more than five or six hundred pounds. It is entirely consumed among the Bedouins, who consider it the greatest dainty which their country affords. The har- vest is usually in June, and lasts for about six weeks. In Nubia, and in every part of Arabia, the tamarisk is one of the most common trees ; on the Euphrates, on the Astabo- ras, in all the valleys of the Hedjaz and the Bedja, it grows in great plenty. It is remarked by Niebuhr, that in Meso- potamia, manna is produced by several trees of the oak spe- cies; a similar fact was confirmed to me by the son of a Turkish lady, who had passed the greater part of his youth at Erzerum m Asia Minor; he told me that at Moush, a town three or four days distant from Erzerum, a substance is collected from the tree which produces the galls, exactly similar to the manna of the penmsula in taste and consist- ence, and that it is used by the inhabitants instead of honey. BURCKHARDT. The notion, however, that any species of vegetable gum is the manna of the scriptures, appears so totally irreconci- lable with the Mosaic narrative, that, notwithstanding the learned names which may be cited in support of the con- jecture, it cannot be safely admitted as any explanation of the miracle. It is expressly said, that the manna was rained from heaven ; that when the dew was exhaled, it appeared lying on the surface of the ground, — " a small, round thing, as small as the hoar-frost," — "like coriander seed, and its colour like a pearl ;" that it fell but six days m the week, and that a double quantity fell on the sixth day; that what was gathered on the first five days became offensive and bred worms if kept above one day, while that which was gathered on the sixth day kept sweet for two days ; that the people had never seen it before, which could not possibly be the case with either wild-honey or gum- arabic ; that it was a substance which admitted of being ground in a handmill or pounded in a mortar, of being made into cakes and baked, and that it tasted like wafers made with honey ; lastly, that it continued falling for the forty years that the Israelites abode in the wilderness, but ceased on their arriving at the borders of Canaan. To perpetuate the remembrance of the miracle, a pot of the manna was to be laid up by the side of the ark, which clearly indicates the extraordinary nature of the produc- tion. In no one respect does it correspond to the modern manna. The latter does not fall from heaven, it is not deposited with the dew, but exudes from the trees w^hen punctured, and is to be found only in the particular spots where those trees abound ; it coiild not, therefore, have supplied the Israelites with food in the more arid parts of the desert, where they most required it. The gums, more- over, flow only for about a month in the year ; they neither admit of being ground, pounded, or baked ; they do not melt in the son ; they do not breed worms ; and they are not peculiar to the Arabian wilderness. Others have supposed the manna to have been a fat and thick honey-dew, and that this was the wild-honey which John the Baptist lived upon, — a supposition worthy of being ranked with the monkish legend of St. John's bread, or the locust-tree, and equally showing an entire ignorance of the nature of the country. It requires the Israelites to have been constantly in the neighbourhood of trees, in the midst of a wilderne.'^s often bare of all vegetation. Whatever the manna was, it was clearly a substitute for bread, and it is expressly called meat, or food. The abundant supply, the periodical sus- pension of it, and the peculiarity attaching to the sixth day's supply, it must at all events be admitted, were ureter natural facts, and facts not less extraordinary than that the substance also should be of an unknown and peculiar de- , Chap. 17—19. EXODUS. 61 scription. The credibility of the sacred narrative cannot receive the slightest addition of evidence from any attempt to explain the miracle by natural causes. That narrative would lead any plain reader to expect that the manna should no longer be foimd to exist, having ceased to fall upwards of 3,000 years. As to the fact that the Arabs give that name to the juice of the tarfa, the value of their au- thority may be estimated by the pulpit of Moses and the footstep of Mohammed's camel. The cause of Revelation has less to fear from the assaults of open infidels, than from such ill-judged attempts of skeptical philosophers, to square the sacred narrative by their notions of probability. The giving of the manna was either a miracle or a fable. The proposed explanation makes it a mixture of both. It ad- mits the fact of a Divine interposition, yet insinuates that Moses gives an incorrect or embellished account of it. It requires us to believe, that the scripture history is at once true and a complete misrepresentation, and that the golden vase of manna was designed to perpetuate the simple fact, that the Israelites lived for forty years upon gum-arabic ! The miracle, as related by Moses, is surely more credible than the explanation. — Modern Traveller. Ver. 16. Gather of it every man according to his eating-; an omer for every man, (Heb. a head,) according to the number of your persons ; take ye every man for them which are in his tents. A man, when offering money to the people to induce the;m to do something for him, says, " To every head, I will give one fanam." In time of sickness or sorrow, it is said, "Ah ! to every head there is now trouble." " Alas ! there is nothing left for any head." *' Yes, yes, he is a good master: to every head he has given a cow." " What did you pay your coolies'?"—*' To every head one fanam." — Roberts. Chap. 17. ver. 1. And all the congregation of the children of Israel journeyed from the wil- derness of Sin, after their journeys, according to the commandment of the Lorb, and pitched in Rephidim : and there was no water for the people to drink. At twenty minutes' walk from the convent of El Erbayn, • a block of granite is shown as the rock out of which the water issued when struck by the rod of Moses. It is thus described by Burckhardt : "** It lies quite insulated by the side of the path, which is about ten feet higher than the lower bottom of the valley. The rock is about twelve feet in height, of an irregular shape, approaching to a cube. There are some apertures upon its surface, through which the water is said to have burst out; they are about twenty in number, and lie nearly in a straight line round the three Sides of the stone. They are for the most part ten or twelve inches long, two or three inches broad, and from one to two inches deep, but a few of them are as deep as four inches. Every observer must be convinced, on the slightest exami- nation, that most of these fissures are the work of art ; but three or four perhaps are natural, and these may have first drawn the attention of the monks to the stone, and have in- duced them to call it the rock of the miraculous supply of water. Besides the marks of art evident in the holes them- selves, the spaces between them have been chiselled, so as to make it appear as if the stone had been worn in those parts by the action of the water ; though it cannot be doubt- ed, that if water had flowed from the Assures, it must gen- erally have taken quite a diiferent direction. One travel- ler saw on this stone twelve openings, answering to the number of the tribes of Israel ; another describes the holes as a foot deep. They were probably told so by the monks, and believed what they heard, rather than what they saw. About 150 paces farther on in the valley, lies another piece of rock, upon which it seems that the work of deception was first begun, there being four or five apertures cut in it, similar to those on the other block, but in a less finished state. As it is somewhat smaller than the former, and lies in a less conspicuous part of the valley, removed from the ptiblic path, the monks thought proper, in process of time, to assign the miracle to the other. As the rock of Moses has been described by travellers of the fifteenth centuiy, the deception must have originated among the monks of an earlier period. As to the present inhabitants of the con- vent and of the peninsula, they must be acquitted of any fraud respecting it, for they conscientiously believe that it is the very rock from whence the water gushed forth. la this part of the peninsula, the Israelites could not have suf- fered from thirst. The upper Sinai is full of wells and springs, the greater part of which are perennial ; and on whichever side the pretended rock of Moses is approached, copious sources are found within an hour of it." The fact, that this part of the peninsula abounds with perennial springs, which is attested by every traveller, proves deci- dedly that this cannot be the vale of Rephidim. It is aston- ishing to find such travellers as Shaw and Pococke credu- lously adopting this imbecile legend. " Here," says the former, " wes^iZZsee that extraordinary antiquity, the rock of Meribah, which hath continued down to this day, without the least injury from time or accident. It is a block of granite marble, about six yards square, lying tottering as it were, and loose in the middle of the valley, and seems to have former- ly belonged to Mount Sinai, which hangs in a variety of pre- cipices all over this plain. The icaterstohich gtished out, and the stream which flowed, (Psalm Ixxviii. 20,) have hollowed, across one corner of this rock, a channel about two inches deep and twenty wide, appearing to be incrustated all over, like the inside of a teakettle that hath been long in use. Besides several mossy productions that are still preserved by the dew, we see all over this channel a great number of holes, some of them four or five inches deep, and one or two in diameter, the lively and demonstrative tokens of their having been formerly so many fountains. It likewise may be further observed, that art or chance could by no means be concerned in the contrivance, for every circum- stance points out to us a miracle, and, in the same manner with the rent in the rock of Mount Calvary, at Jerusalem, never fails to produce a religious surprise in all who see it." That this rock is as truly the Rock of Meribah, as the spot alluded to is Mount Calvary, may be freely admitted ; but the surprise which they are adapted to awaken in an intelligent observer, is at the credulity of travellers. " These supernatural mouths," says Sir F. Henniker, " appear to me common crevices in the rock : they are only two inches in depth, and their length is not confined to the water- course. That the incrustation is the effect of water, I have not the slightest doubt, for the rocks close at hand, where water is still dripping, are marked in the same manner : and if a fragment of the cliff" were to fall down, we .should scarcely distinguish between the two. I therefore doubt the identity of the stone, and also the locality ; for, in this place, the miracle would be that a mountain so lofty as Mount Sinai should be without water !" — Modern Trav- eller. Ver. 16. For he said, Because the Lord hath sworn that the Lord will have war v/ith Amalek from generation to generation. Literally, " Because the hand of the Lord is upon the throne." These words are susceptible of a very diflTerent meaning, which has not escaped the notice of some valua- ble commentators: "For he said. Because his hand hath been against the throne of the Lord, therefore, will he have war with Amalek from generation to generation." The prophet is there giving a reason of the perpetual war which Jehovah had just proclaimed against that devoted race ; their hand had been against the throne of the Lord, that is, they had attacked the people whom he had chosen, and among whom he had planted his throne ; disregarding, or probably treating with contempt, the miraculous signs of the divine presence which led the way, and warranted the operations of Israel ; they attempted to stop their progress, and defeat the promise of Heaven ; therefore they dared to lift their hand against the throne of God himself, and were for their presumption, doomed to the destruction which they intended for others. Hence, the custom of laying the hand upon the gospels, as an appeal to God, if not the contrivance of modern superstition, is derived from the practice of some obscure Gentile nation, and has no claim whatever to a more reputable origin. — Paxton. Chap. 19. ver. 1. In the third month, when the 62 EXODUS. Chap. 19. children of Israel were gone forth out of the land of Eg-ypt, the same day came they into the wilderness of Sinai. We were near twelve hours in passing the many wind- ings and difficult ways which lie betwixt the deserts of Sin and Sinai. The latter is a beautiful plain, more than a league in breadth, and nearly three in length, lying open towards the N.E., where we entered it, but is closed up to the southward by some of the lower eminences of Mount Sinai, in this direction, likewise, the higher parts of it make such encroachments on the plain, that they divide it into two, each of them capacious enough to receive the whole en- campment of the Israelites. That which lieth to the east- ward of the mount, may be the desert of Sinai, properly so called, where Moses smo the angel of the Lord in the burning bush, when he was guarding the flocks of Jethro. The con- vent of St. Catharine is built over the place of this divine appearance: it is near three hundred feet square, and more than forty in height, being partly built with stone, partly with mud only and -mortar mixed together. The more immediate place of the Shekinah is honoured with a little chapel, which this old fraternity of St. Basil hath in such esteem and veneration, that, in imitation of Moses, they put off" their shoes from off their feet, when they enter or approach it. This, with several other chapels, dedica- ted to particular saints, are included within the church, as ihey call it, of the Transfiguration, which is a large beau- tiful structure, covered with lead, and supported by two rows of marble columns. The floor is very elegantly laid out in a variety of devices in Mosaic work ; of the same workmanship, likewise, are both the floor and the walls of the presbyterium, upon the latter whereof is represented the figure of the Emperor Justinian, together with the his- tory of the transfiguration. On the partition, which sepa- rates the presbyterium from the body of the church, there is placed a small marble shrine, whereon are preserved the scull and one of the hands of St. Catharine. Mount Sinai hangs over this convent, being called by the Arabs, Jebbel Mousa, the mountain of Moses, and sometimes only, by way of eminence, El Tor, the mountain. St. Helena was at the expense of the stone staircase, that was formerly car- ried up entirely to the top of it ; but, at present, as most of these steps are either removed, washed out of their places, or defaced, the ascent up to it is very fatiguing, and entire- ly imposed on their votaries as a severe penance. How- ever, at certain distances, the fathers have erected, as so many breathing places, several little chapels, dedicated to one or omer of their samis. who are always invoked on these occasions ; and, after some small oblation, are en- gaged to lend their assistance. The summit of Mount Sinai is somewhat conical, and not very spacious, where the Mohammedans, as well as the Christians, have a small chapel for public worship. Here we were shown the place where Moses fasted forty days ; where he received the law ; where he hid himself from the face of God ; where his hand was supported by Aaron and Hur, at the battle with Amalek. After we had descended, with no small difficul- ty, down the western side of this mountain, we came into the other plain formed by it, which is Rephidim. — Shaw. The Arabs call Jebbel Musa, the mount of Moses, all that range of mountains at the exterior extremity of the valley of Paran ; and to that part of the range on which the con- vent of St. Catharine stands, they give the name of Tur Sina. This similarity of name, owing most probably to tradition, affords ground for presuming, that the hill which we had now reached was the Sinai of the Jews, on which Moses received the law. It is, indeed, not easy to compre- hend how such a multitude of people as the Jews, who ac- companied Moses out of Egypt, could encamp in those narrow gullies, amid frightful and precipitous rocks. But, perhaps, there are plains on the other side of the moun- tain, that we know not of. Two German miles and a half up the mountain stands the convent of St. Catharine. The body of this monastery is a building one hundred and twen- ty feet in length, and almost as many in breadth. Before it stands another small building, in which is the only gate of the convent, which remains always shut, except when the bishop is here. At other times, whatever is introduced within the convent, whether men or provisions, is drawn I'p to the roof, in a basket, with a cord and a pulley. The whole building is of hewn stone, which, in such a desert. must have cost prodigious expense and pains. Next day our scheichs brought me an Arab, whom they qualified with the title of scheich of Mount Sinai. Under the con- duct of this newly-created lord of Sinai, with our scheichs, I attempted to clamber to the summit of that mountain. It is so steep, that Moses cannot have ascended on the side which I viewed. The Greeks have cut a flight of steps up the rock, Pococke reckons three thousand of these steps to the top of the mountain, or, rather, bare-pointed rocK, Five hundred steps above the convent we found a charm- ing spring, which, by a little pains, might be improved into a very agreeable spot. A thousand steps higher, a chapel, dedicated to the Blessed Virgin; and five hundred above this, two other chapels, situated in a plain, which travellers enter by two small gates of mason work. Upon this plain are two trees, under which, at high festivals, the Arabs are regaled at the expense of the Greeks. My Mohammedan guides, imitating the practice which they had seen the pil- grims observe, kissed the images, and repeated their pray- ers in the chapels. They would accompany me no farther, but maintained this to be the highest accessible peak of the mountain ; whereas, according to Pococke, I had yet a thousand steps to ascend. I was, therefore, obliged to re- turn, and content myself with viewing the hill of St. Catha- rine at a distance. — Niebuhr. After reposing in the convent and its delightful garden, the first duty of a pilgrim is, to climb the summit of tlie Djebel Mousa, or mountain of Moses, the road to which be- gins to ascend immediately behind the walls of the convent. Regular steps (it is said, to the number of 15,000) have been cut all the way up ; but they are now either entirely de- stroyed, or so much damaged by the winter torrents, as* to be of very little use. They are ascribed to the munificence of the Empress Helena. " After ascending for about twen- ty-five minutes," says Burckhardt, " we breathed a short time under a large impending rock, close by which is a small well of water, as cold as ice. At the end of three quartej-s of an hour's steep ascent, we came to a small plain, the entrance to which from below is through a stone gate- way, which in former times was probably closed : a little beneath it, stands, amid the rocks, a small church dedica- ted to the Virgin. On the plain is a larger building of rude construction, which bears the name of the convent of St. Elias: it was lately inhabited, but is now abandoned, the monks repairing here only at certain times of the year to read mass. Pilgrims usually halt on this spot, where a tall cypress-tree grows by the side of a stone tank, which re- ceives the winter raiiis. On a large rock in the plain are < several Arabic inscriptions, engraved by pilgrims three or four hundred years ago ; I saw one also in the Syriac lan- guage. According to the Koran and Moslem traditions, it was in this part of the mountain, which is called Djebel Oreb, or Horeb, that Moses communicated with the Lord. From hence a still steeper ascent of half an hour, the steps of which are also in ruins, leads to the summit of Djebel Mousa, where stands the church which forms the principal object of the pilgrimage : it is built on the very peak of the mountain, the plane of which is at most sixty paces in circumference. The church, though strongly built with granite, is now greatly dilapidated by the unremitted at- tempts of the Arabs to destroy it ; the door, roof, and wal!i are greatly injured. Some ruins round the church indicate that a much larger and more solid building once stood here ; and the rock ap- pears to have been cut perpendicularly with great labour, to prevent any other approach to it than by the southern side The view from this summit must be very grand, but i thick fog prevented me from seeing even the nearest moun- tains. About thirty paces from the church, on a some what lower peak, stands a poor mosque, without any orn? ments, held in great veneration by the Moslems, and thi place of their pilgrimage. It is frequently visited by th^ Bedouins, who slaughter sheep in honour of Moses, anfl who make vows to him, and entreat his intercession ill heaven in their favour. There is a feast-day on which the' Bedouins come hither in a mass, and offer their sacrifices, I was told that formerly they never approached the place without being dressed iii the Ihram, or sacred mantle, with which the Moslems cover their naked bodies on visilini^ Mecca, and which then consisted only of a napkin tie^l round the middle ; but this custom has been abandoned for | the last forty years. Foreign Moslem pilgrims often repaiir '' i Chap. 19—21. EXODUS. 63 . to the spot ; and even Mohammed Ali Pasha, and his son ' Tousoun Pasha, gave notice that ihey intended to visit it, ! but they did not keep their promise. Close by the loolpath, in the ascent from St. Elias to this summit, and at a small distance from it, a place is shown in the rock, which some- what resembles the print of the forepart of the foot; it is staled to have been made by Mohammed's foot when he visited the mountain. We found the adjacent part of the rock sprinkled with blood, in consequence of an accident which happened a few days before to a Turkish lady of rank, who was on her way from Cairo to Mecca, with her son, and who had resided for some weeks in the convent, duiia? Avhich she had made the tour of the sacred places, barefooted, although she was old and decrepit. In altempt- i!!g to kiss the mark of Mohammed's foot, she fell, and woanded her head, but not so severely as to prevent her from pursuing her pilgrimage. Somewhat below the I mosque is a fine reservoir, cut very deep in the granite y i-ock, for the reception of rain-water. ' Mr. Fazakerley says, it is difficult to imagine a scene more desolate and terrific then that which is discovered fi om the summit of Sinai. A haze limited the prospect, land, except a glimpse of the sea in one direction, nothing fjwas within sight but snow, and huge peaks and crags of naked granite. Sir F. Henniker describes it as a " sea of desolation." " It would seem," he says, " as if Arabia Pe- liLva had once been an ocean of lava, and that while its waves were running literally mountains high, it was com- manded suddenly to stand still." He did not ascend the Djchel Katerin ; but the former traveller did, and speaks of it in the following terms : " The view from hence is of tlie same kind, only much more extensive than from the toj) of Sinai: it commands the two seas (gulfs) of Akaba ami Suez ; the island of Tiraan and the village of Tor were l^oiuted out to us: Sinai was far below us; clouds prevent- lmI our seeing the high ground near Suez: all the rest, wiierever the eye could reach, was a vast wilderness, and .1 confusion of granite mountains and valleys destitute of verdure." Burckhardt thus describes the country as seen from this fame summit: " From this elevated peak, a very extensive view opened before us, and the direction of the ui ill-rent surrounding chains of mountains could be dis- tinctly traced. The upper nucleus of the Sinai, composed r.Luost entirely of granite, forms a rocky wilderness of an i ' ri^gular circular shape, intersected by many narrow val- Icvs, and from thirty to forty miles in diameter. It con- tains the highest mountains of the peninsula, whose shag- C^v and pointed peaks, and steep and shattered sides, ren- der it, clearly distinguishable from all the rest of the coun- w V in view. It is upon this highest region of the peninsu- la, that the fertile valleys are found, which produce fruit- trees : they are principally to the west and southwest of the f-iinvenr, at three or four hours' distance. Water, too, is nj gadeesh is translated! in two other places, is less exceptionable, but not perfectly' expressive of the original idea. We put together, or heap up our corn, not fully ripe, in parcels which are called shocks, that it may more perfectly ripen after being cut, but the original word trni gadeesh, means a heap of corn, fully ripe, see Job v. 26; means, in a word, the heaps of the eastern threshing-floors, ready to be trodden out. — Harmer. Ver. 26. If thou at all take thy neighbour's rai- 1 ment to pledge, thou shalt deliver it unto him I by that the sun goeth down : 27. For that is ' his covering only ; it is his raiment for his skin : wherein shall he sleep? and it shall come to pass, w^hen he crieth unto me, that I will hear : ; for I am gracious. ? The clothes which the Orientals wear by day, serve them^ as bed-clothes for the night. Does a man wish to retire to3 rest, he needs not to trouble himself about the curtains, he| requires not the bed-steps, he does not examine whether| his bolsters or pillows are in order, he is not very particu-| lar about the adjustment of his sheets and counterpane; hei throws a mat on the floor, places his little travelling bag or' turban for a pillow, takes off his cloth, (which is general]/.: about nine yards long,) puts one end under him; then' covers his feet, and folds the rest round his body, leaving' the upper end to cover his face. Thus may be seen coolie*' in the morning, stretched side by side, having, during the night, defied all the stings of their foes, the moschetoes. — Roberts. The upper garment of the Israelites was a large square cloth which folded round the whole body, and served the poor as a bed-covering during the night. Less altera- tion than could have been expected has taken place in the d^'-ess of the eastern people. This garment was still found by Shaw in the eighteenth century, among the Be- douin Arabs in the north of Africa, under the Arabiajl name of Hyke, i. e. texture, covering. In fair weathet this cloth is therefore mostly worn on the shoulders, a» Chap. 23—24. EXODUS. Niebuhr observes in his Description of Arabia. " It will not, perhaps, be imagined," says he, " that the above-men- tioned little clothing constitutes the whole bedding of a common Arab. He spreads out his great girdle, and so he has a bed to lie down upon : with the cloth which he wears on his shoulders, he covers his whole body and face, and sleeps naked between these two cloths, quite happy and contented." — Rosenmuller. In all parts of Southern Africa, the skin cloak is the covering of males and females by day, and that in which they sleep by night : they have no other bed-clothes. The Hottentot cloak is composed of sheep skins, retaining the wool on the inside of it, in which he sleq)s comfortably under a bush or tree wherever he goes. Deprive him of that covering, and he would find himself most uncomfort- ably placed. It would be a cruel act. The nations farther in the interior, have cloaks made from hides of oxen or cows, which they have a method of rendering soft and pliable, and use exactly for the same purposes as the others, viz. for clothing and for sleeping in. The Israelites sleep- ing in the wilderness in this simple manner, would be always ready to remove when the trumpet intimated the moving of the pillar of fire ; like the dogs, when they shook themselves, they might be said to be dressed and ready to march. The God who gave such a humane, considerate law to the Israelites, might well be called a gracious God, —African Light. Chap. 23. ver. 4. If thou meet thine enemy's ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again. Among the Hindoos, malice often finds its victim in a dumb animal. If the wretch cannot revenge himself on the man, he will on his beast. The miscreant watches till the cattle go astray, or the owner shall be out of the way, when he pounces upon the innocent ox or cow, and cuts off the tail. Hence may be seen, in every village, cattle which thus proclaim the diabolical passions of man. — Roberts. Ver. 17. Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the Lord God. To those that may wonder how Jerusalem could receive such multitudes, as were obliged by the Jewish law to at- tend there three times a-year, and as we know did some- times actually appear in it, I would recite the account that Pitts gives of Mecca, the sacted city of the Mohammedans, and the number he found collected together there, for the celebration of their religious solemnities, in the close of the 17th century. This city, he tells us, he thought he might safely say, had not one thousand families in it of constant inhabitants, and the buildings very mean and ordinaiy. That four caravans arrive there every year, with great numbers of people in each, and the Mohammedans say, there meet not fewer than seventy thousand souls at these solemnities ; and that though he could not think the num- ber quite so large, yet that it is very great. How such numbers of people, with their beasts, could be lodged and entertained in such a little town as Mecca, is a question he thus answers. " As for house-room, the inhabitants do straiten themselves very much, in order at this time to make their market. As for such as come last, after the town is filled, they pitch their tents without the town, and there abide until they remove towards home. As for pro- vision, they all bring sufficient with them, except it be of flesh, which they may have at Mecca ; but all other provi- sions, as butter, honey, oil, olives, rice, biscuit, &c. they bring with them, as much as will last through the wilder- ness, forward and backward, as well as the time they stay at Mecca ; and so for their camels they bring store of prov- ender, &c. with them." The number of Jews that assem- bled at Jerusalem at their passover was much greater : but had not Jerusalem been a much larger city than Mecca is, as in truth it was, yet the present Mohammedan practice of abiding imder tents, and carrying their provisions and bedding with them, will easily explain how they might be accommodated. — Burder, Ver. 19. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk. The Jewish legislator three times forbids his people to 9 " seethe a kid in his mother's milk." The meaning of this law has been greatly disputed, although the terms in which it is couched, are sufficiently clear and precise. It is the opinion of some writers, that the prohibition refers to a kid in the womb of its mother, which in that state is nourished only with milk ; but the opinion of Clemens, that the people of Israel had been in the practice of eating the foetus of a goat, which this precept was intended to prohibit, is sup- ported by no proof. The disgusting custom of eating the foetus of a sow, is indeed mentioned by Plutarch ; but we have no proof that it was known to epicures in the times of Moses. Other expositors imagine, that the Jews were by this precept forbidden to takeaway the life of a kid, before it was eight days old, when, according to them, it may sub- sist without the aid of its mother's milk. This exposition is supposed to be confirmed by another precept : " When a bullock, or a sheep, or a goat is brought forth, then it shall be seven days under the dam ; and from the eighth day, and thenceforth, it shall be accepted for an offering made by fire unto the Lord." But si^ce the law, which prohibited the people of Israel to offer in sacrifice, " the young of the herd, or of the flock," before the eighth day, is immediately subjoined to the precept concerning the oblation of the first ripe fruits, and the first-born, in the twenty-second chapter of Exodus ; so, in the twenty-third and thirty-fourth chap- ters, the law which forbids to seethe a kid in his mother's milk, follows the same precept ; and by consequence, not only the sacred, but also the common use of the kid, is pro- hibited before the eighth day. Such is the opinion, and the reasoning by which it is supported ; but it must be evi- dent to every reader, that a kid is as much in his mother's milk all the time he is suckled, as during the first eight days ; nor can any reason be imagined, why he may not be said to be in his mother's milk on the seventh day from his birth, rather than on the eighth or the ninth. Others are of opinion, that, according to this precept, a sucking kid was at no time to be slain, either for sacred or common use. The she-goat suckles her young about three months ; and till this period, it was not to be subjected to the sacri- ficing knife. But it is very improbable, that the Jews were forbidden the use of a kid for so long a time ; for that which the law permits to be offered in sacrifice to God, may surely be eaten by his people. Nor was any species of food pro- hibited by the law, out for ceremonial impurity. But that cannot be reckoned legally unclean, which the law permits to be offered in sacrifice at the altar. He permitted a suck- ing kid or lamb, to be offered on the eighth day ; a sure proof they were not reckoned unclean, while they remained under the dam. The prophet Samuel offered a sucking lamb as a burnt-offering to the Lord on a day of public humiliation ; and God condescended to give them a strong proof of his acceptance, in utterly discomfiting their ene- mies, by a furious tempest of thunder and lightning. If, therefore, a sucking kid might be offered in sacrifice to God, it might be used as food by his people. Nor is their opinion more tenable, who say, that by this law the dam and her suckling were not to be slain at the same time. To cherish kind and humane feelings among the chosen seed, Jehovah forbade them to kill a cow, a sheep, or a goat, on the same day with their young ; but the precept under consideration cannot naturally bear such a meaning. Had this been the design of Moses, why did he not say in plain terms. Thou shalt not seethe a kid and his mother at the same time 1 He must, therefore, have meant what the words naturally suggest, that a kid is not to be seethed in the milk of his mother. The barbarous custom to which the lawgiver alludes, probably existed in some neighbour- ing countries, and particularly in Egypt, from whose iron yoke they had just been delivered ; either because the flesh dressed in this manner was more tender and juicy, than when roasted with fire, or boiled in water ; or, which is more probable, while at the feast of ingathering, they gave thanks to God for the mercies they had received, and ex- pressed their dependance upon him for future blessings, they were not to expect his favour by imitating the super- stitious rites of the heathens, among whom they had lived so long, who at the end of their harvest seethed a kid in his mother's milk, and sprinkled the broth in a magical way upon their gardens and fields, to render them more fruitful next season. — Paxton. Chap. 24. ver. 28. And I will send hornets be- 66 EXODUS. Chap. 24—25. fore thee, which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hiltite, from before thee. Another insect which Heaven has sometimes employed to avenge the quarrel of his covenant, is the hornet ; which is a larger species of wasp. The irascible temper and poi- sonmis sting of the wasp, are too well known to require de- scription ; they have been mentioned by the natural histo- rians, and celebrated by the poets of every age and coun- try. In three parallel places of scripture, the sacred wri- ter mentions the hornet which Jehovah sent before his people, to expel the Canaanites from their habitations : " And I will send hornets before thee, which shall drive out the Hivite, the Canaanite, and the Hittite from before thee." This promise was afterward renewed a short time before that people passed the Jordan : " Moreover, the Lord thy God will send the hornet among them, till they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed." Both these promises, we learn from Joshua, were punctu- ally fulfilled : " And I sent t^e hornet before you, which drave them out from Defore you, even the two kings of the Amorites, but not with thy sword, nor with thy bow." At what particular time during the wars of Joshua, the Lord, in fulfilment of his promise, sent the hornet against the in- habitants of Canaan, and what impression its attack made upon the enemies of Israel, we are nowhere informed in scripture. On this account, several writers of great emi- nence consider the words of Moses as a metaphor, denoting the terror of the Lord, or some remarkable disease which he commissioned to lay waste the country before the armies of Israel. But neither the words of Moses nor Joshua, be- tray the smallest indication of metaphor : and in a plain narration, we are never, without the most obvious neces- sity, to depart from the literal sense. The inspired histo- rian could not mean the terror of the Lord, as Augustine is inclined to suppose ; for he had mentioned this in the verse immediately preceding : " I will send my fear before thee, and will destroy all the people to whom thou shalt come, and I will make all thine enemies turn their backs unto thee." Upon which it is added, " And I will send hornets before thee." Nor could any particular disease be intended ; for no disease was ever called by this name. Junius gives a different version : I will send before thee fear or disease as a hornet ; but the comparative particle as, is not in the text, and must not be supplied by the ca- price of translators. The words of Joshua are express, without either metaphor or comparison : " I have sent the hornet before you." It is no valid objection to the literal sense, that the circumstances of time and place are not mentioned by the sacred writer, for this is by no means an unusual omission in the rapid narrative of an inspired his- torian. To mention but one example : the patriarch Ja- cob gave to his son Joseph a portion of land, which he took from the Amorite by force of arms ; but when or in what place this battle was fought, we are not informed. The hornet, it is probable, marched before the armies of Israel, till the five nations that had been doomed for their numer- ous and long-continued crimes to destruction, were sub- dued ; which rendered such a circumstantial detail unne- cessary and improper. But who can believe, say they, that the hornets of Canaan were so vexatious to the inhab- itants, that they were forced to abandon their dwellings, and seek for other habitations 1 The testimony of an in- spired writer ought to silence all such objections ; but, in reality, the same thing has not unfrequently happened in the liistory of the world. Both Athenoeus and Eustatheus in- tbrm us, that the people about Paeonia and Dardania were compelled by frogs to forsake their native country, and fix their abode in a distant region. If Pliny may be credited, the ancient city of Troy was forced to open her gates, after a war often years, not so much by the victorious arms of the Greeks, as by an innumerable host of mice, which compelled the Trojans to desert their houses, and retire to the neighbouring mountains ; and in Italy, whole nations were driven from their possession by the same destructive creature, which in immense mimbers ov^erran their fields, devoured every green thing, and, grubbing up the roots, converted some of the fairest regions of that country into an mhospitable waste. The Myusians, according to Pau- Fanias, were forced, by swarms of gnats, to desert their f'itv; and the Scythians beyond the Ister, are recorded to liave been expelled from their country by countless my- riads ( ; bees. But, since the wasp is more vexatious than the bee, its sting more severe, and its hostility more viru- lent — it is by no means incredible, that many of the Ca- naanites were fo.-ced, by so formidable an enemy, to re- move beyond the reach of their attack. — Paxton. Chap. 25. ver. 5. And rams' skins died red, and badgers' skins, and shittim-wood. To enter into the history of this animal is unnecessary, as it is mentioned in scripture only on account of its skin. This part of the animal seems to have been in great re- quest among the people of Israel, for it is mentioned among the valuable articles which they were permitted to offer for the tabernacle : " Rams' skins died red, and badgers' skins." These last formed the exterior covering of that splendid structure, and of all the sacred utensils, which the Levites were commanded to spread over them during their march. Of these also the shoes of the mystical bride were formed, when, according to the representation of the prophet, she was richly adorned for the marriage. Jehovah had chosen Israel to be his peculiar people, and had bestowed upon them innumerable favours, but they had become ungrate- ful and perfidious, like a woman who proves inconstant and unfaithful to her husband, who had raised her from the meanest condition, to the greatest affluence and splen- dour : " Thou becamest mine. Then I washed thee with water ; yes, I thoroughly washed away thy blood from thee, and I anointed thee with oil. I clothed thee also with broidered work, and shod thee with badgers' skin ; and I girded thee about with fine linen, and I covered thee with silk." In this passage, badgers' skin is mentioned as a very precious and splendid substance, such as might be made into shoes for ladies of the highest rank, and worn on their marriage day; while, in the book of Exodus, it is represented as very coarse and homely, fit only to be made a covering for the tabernacle, and its furniture, during the journeys of the tribes. These very different representa- tions cannot easily be reconciled, and involve the subject in doubt and uncertainty. And indeed the original word (tynn) tahash, which our translators render badgers' skins, is of very uncertain meaning. It is evident from scripture, that it was a kind of skin which, being capable of resisting rain, was manufactured by the people of Israel into cover- ings for the tabernacle and its furniture, and into shoes for persons of the highest rank in the state. But the inspir- ed writers furnish no details from which it can be inferred, to what animal it originally belonged ; it is even extremely doubtful, whether the word rendered badger, denotes an animal at all. The Seventy interpreters considered it merely as the name of a colour, and uniformly translate it hyacinth, or hyacinthine. In this opinion, they were fol- lowed by all the ancient translators of the scripture, with- out one exception ; and the same idea has been adopted by the learned Bochart, and other eminent moderns. The reasons on which their interpretation is founded, seem to be quite conclusive. In the first place, no evidence can be found that the badger ever existed in Palestine, Arabia, or Egypt. Dr. Shaw made particular inquiry, but could hear of no such animal in Barbary. Harmer was unable to discover in modern travellers, the smallest traces of the badger in Egypt, or in any of the adjacent countries ; Buf- fon represents it as unknown in that part of Asia. So little was the badger known to the ancients, that the Greeks had not a word in their language by which to express it ; and the Latin term which is supposed to denote this animal, is extremely doubtful. But if the badger is not a native of the East, if it is not to be found m those countries, from whence could the people of Israel in the wilderness, pro- cure its skin to cover the tabernacle 1 It is an animal of small size, and is nowhere found in great numbers ; and, by consequence, its skin could not, in remote times, more than at present, constitute an article of commerce in the ports of Egypt, and come at last into the possession of that people. The exterior covering of the tabernacle, and its bulky utensils, must have required a greater number of skins than could be procured even in the native country of the badger; and therefore, it must have been formed of leather, fabricated from the skin of some other animal, which not only existed, but also abounded in Egypt, and the adjacent countries. The coarseness of the leather, fabricated of badgers' skin, which in the East is reluctantly Chap. 26. EXODUS. 67 employed for the meanest purposes of life, forbids us to consider it as the material of which the elegant 1ft oes of an oriental lady are formed. When the prophet says in the name of the Lord, " I clothed thee also with broidered work, and shod thee with badgers' skin, and I girded thee about with fine linen, and I covered thee with silk," he certainly meant, that the shoes, corresponding to the other parts of the dress, were formed of costly materials. The Targum accoriingly translates the passage, " I put pre- cious shoes upon tny feet ;" but this could be said with no propriety of shoes made of badgers' skins. Nor can it be supposed, that the skin of an animal, which the law of Moses pronounces unclean, strictly enjoins the people of Israel not to touch, or if they did happen to touch it, not to worship at the tabernacle, till the ceremonial pollution which they accidentally contracted was removed according to the precept, — would be employed to cover that sacred struc- ture, and its consecrated utensils, and that the Levites should be obliged c ften to handle it in performing the du- ties of their office. The sacred implements of Jewish wor- ship, certainly were defended from the injuries of the wea- ther by the skins of clean beasts, which were easily pro- cured, and that in sufficient numbers, even in the wilder- ness. This idea, so conformable to the spotless purity re- quired in the ceremonial law, has been adopted and main- tained by all the earlier Jewish writers, whose authority in matters of this kind is entitled to great respect. Many disputes indeed have been agitated among them, in relation to the particular animal employed ; but none of them be- fore the time of Jarchi, who flourished about the middle of the eleventh century, supposed that it was the skin of the badger. These considerations leave no room for doubt in the mind of the writer, that the original term denotes neither the badger, nor any other animal, but merely a colour. What particular colour is meant, it may not be easy to ascertain ; but when it is considered, that the peo- ple of rank and fashion in the East, were accustomed to appear in purple shoes, it is extremely probable, that pur- ple was the colour intended by the sacred writer. The Chaldee Paraphrast accordingly, expounds the words of the Song, " How beautiful are thy feet with shoes," how beautiful are the feet of Israel, when they go up to appear three times before the Lord in purple sandals ! The Ro- man emperors, and the kings of Persia, reserved by a for- mal edict, shoes of a purple colour for their own use ; and it is said, red shoes were among the insignia of the an- cient kingdom of Bulgaria. Hence, Isaac Comnenus, the Roman emperor, deprived the patriarch of Constantinople of his dignity, because he presumed to put on shoes of a crimson colour, although these were formerly worn at Rome by persons of the senatorial order. — Paxton. Ver. 10. And they shall make an ark o/shittim- wood : two cubits and a half shall be the length thereof and a cubit and a half the breadth thereof, and a cubit and a half the height thereof. Concerning the shitta tree, mentioned by the prophet Isaiah with the cedar and the myrtle, different opinions are entertained by commentators. The name is derived from the Hebrew verb Shata, to decline or turn to and fro^ hav- ing for the plural Shittim. It is remarkable for being the wood of which the sacred vessels of the tabernacle were made. The Seventy interpreters generally render it by ' the term a. ness of its spines. The interpretation now given, seems to be confirmed by the following remark of Dr. Shaw ; " The acacia being by much the largest and the most com- mon tree of these deserts, we have some reason to conjec- ture, that the shittim-wood, of which the several utensils of the tabernacle were made, was the wood of the acacia. This tree abounds with flowers of a globular figure, and of an excellent smell ; which is another proof of its being the shitta tree of the scriptures, which, in the prophecies of Isaiah, is joined with the myrtle and other sweet-smelling plants." Besides, we have no reason to conclude, that the people of Israel possessed any species of wood for making the utensils of the tabernacle, but what they could procure in the desert; but the desert produces none' in the quantity required, except the acacia. In one place they found seven- ty-two palm-trees: but the sacred writer distinguishes them by their vulgar name ; therefore they could not be the same tree ; nor is the palm, which is a soft spongy wood, at ail fit for the purpose, — for the nature of the utensils, as the ark of the testimony and the mercy-seat, required wood ol a fibre the hardest, the most beautiful and durable which could be found, had it been in their power to make a choice ; and these are the very characters of the acacia. To these important qualities may be added, the fragrant odour emit- ted by this wood, which to Orientals who delight in rich perfumes, must have been a powerful recommendation. But if the acacia was perfectly suited to the purpose of Mo- ses, and if the desert produces no other, as Dr. Shaw de- clares, the shittim-wood mentioned in the scriptures must be the acacia of the natural historian. — Paxton. Chap. 26. ver. 1. Moreover, thou shalt make the tabernacle with ten curtains of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet : ivith cher- ubims of cunning work shalt thou make them. It seems that the tabernacle, as it was ordered in the plan given, might be called a tent or a house, because it had wooden walls or partitions like a house, and curtains and hangings like a lent ; but as it externally resembled a tent, and that a common oblong tent, such as those of the Arabs, for the most part, now are, and the wooden walls were without a roof, and properly only supports for the many curtains and hangings which spread over them, it is better and more properly called a tent. Even the ordinary tent*; of the wandering tribes of the East have at least two main divisions ; the innermost or hindmost is for the women ; and, among the Orientals, it is in this sense sacred, i. e. parted oflf, inaccessible. The first space is divided from the innermost only by a curtain, and is for the men ; what is found in the tents of the common people is found also, but far more rich and splendid, in the tents of the men of rank. The tent of an emir or prince has more conveniences ; the inrfermost space is only accessible to himself, or to those whom he especially honours : into the first space, or outer tent, others may come. The furniture is costly, the floor is covered with a rich carpet, and a stand, with the censer and coals, on which incense is strewed. Here we have the simple idea after which this royal tent, this abode of God, who was at the same time king of the Hebrew people, was made. It was not to be a house or a palace, but a tent, and that with all the magnificence which the skill of the He- brews in architecture could erect. The boards for the standing walls were covered with plates of gold; twenty boards, which served as pillars to the supporters, standing upright, joined together, each three feet broad and twenty high, made on each side the length, and eight the breadth, so that eight-and-forty such boards, twenty in the length on each side, and eight for the breadth of the back wall, (for the front side had only a curtain,) resting upon two silver sockets, formed the partition. This oblong quadrangle was separated into two parts or divisions ; the innermost, or the most holy ; and the front, or the holy. The innermost was properly the dwelling of the Lord, the front one was more for his service. The inner division was very considerable, sixty feet long, twenty feet broad, and twenty high ; and, as over this extensive frame-work several covers were spread, which hung down on three sides, (that is, all round except at the entrance,) this also gave the tent a greatei appearance, so that it was undoubtedly distinguished b} 68 EXODUS. Chap. 26—29. its size. In the coverings of the tents, the Orientals, who are fond of magnificence, regard both the stuff and the colour : this royal tent was to be distinguished in both par- ticulars. The curtain, which lay immediately under the beams, was the most beautiful and the most costly. On the finest linen stuff were embroidered cherubims of the most beautiful colours, dark blue, purple, and scarlet. Thus the tents of eastern princes, even in our days, are distin- guished by most beautiful colours. Olearius, accompany- ing the ambassadors of Holstein Gottorf, who were invited by the Persian monarch to a hunting party, found in an Ar- menian village many tents, ready for the reception of the company, which afforded a pleasing sight on account of their manifold colours. Over the under curtain a cover- ing of goats' hair was spread, which is the usual covering of the Arabian tents, commonly coarse, but here of the finest texture ; and, that these coverings might not be in- jured by the sand or dust, two others, made of skins, were laid over them. The portable temple of the Israelites had, indeed, in its whole arrangement, a resemblance with the temples of other nations of antiquity. As they had spacious forecourts, so had the tabernacle an oblong quadrangular forecourt, two hundred feet long, and one hundred broad, which was formed by the hangings or curtains which hung on pillars. The tabernacle itself was divided into two parts, the holy and the most holy ; in the latter was the ark of the covenant, with the symbols of the divine qualities, the cherubims; and no human being dared to enter this especially sanctified place, except the high-priest, once a year, (oii the feast of reconciliation.) Thus, also, in many Grecian temples, the back part was not to be entered by anybody. (Lackemacher's Antiq. Grsecor. Sacr.) This ]iart, where, in the heathen temples, the statue of the deity was placed, was generally towards the west, and the en- trance towards the east. (Spencer de Leg. Hebrgeor. Ritual.) In the same manner the entrance of the tabernacle was towards the east, and, consequently, the most holy place to the west. In the most holy, a solemn darkness reigned, as in most of the ancient temples. A richly-worked cur- tain divided the most holy from the holy, and thus, in the Egyptian temples, the back part, where the sacred animal to which the temple was dedicated, was kept, was divided from the front part by a curtain embroidered with gold. — ROSENMULLER. Ver. 36. And thou shalt make a hanging for the door of the tent, of blue, and purple, and scar- let, and fine twined linen, wrought w^ith needle- work. We passed Lahar, close to a small valley, where we found several snug encampments of the Eelauts, at one of which we stopped to examine the tent of the chief of the o/!>aA, or family. It was composed of a wooden frame of circu- lar laths, which were fixed on the ground, and then cover- ed over with large felts, that were fastened down by a cord, ornamented by tassels of various colours. A curtain, cu- riously worked by the w^dmen, with coarse needle-work of various colours, was suspended over the door. In the king of Persia's tents, magnificent perdahs, or hangings of nee- dle-work, are suspended, as well as on the doors of the great mosques in Turkey ; and these circumstances com- bined, will, perhaps, illustrate Exodus xxvi. 36. — Morier. Chap. 27. ver. 20. And thou shalt command the children of Israel, that they bring thee pure oil-olive beaten for the light, to cause the lamp to burn always. By the expression oil-olive, this oil is distinguished from other kinds. The addition beaten, indicates that it is that oil obtained from olives pounded in a mortar, and not pressed from olives in the oil-mill. The oil obtained from pounded olives is, according to Columella's observation, much purer and better tasted, does not emit much smoke, and has no offensive smell. — Burder, Chap. 28. ver. 33. And beneath, upon the hem of it, thou shalt make pomegranates of blue, and of purple, and o/ scarlet, round about the hem fnereof; and bells of gold between them round about. The bell seems to have been a sacred utensil of very ancient use in Asia. Golden bells formed a part of the orna- ments of the pontifical robe of the Jewish high-priest, with which he invested himself upon those grand and peculiar festivals, when he entered into the sanctuary. That robe was very magnificent, it was ordained to be of sky-blue, and the border of it, at the bottom, was adorned with pomegranates and gold bells intermixed equally, and at equal distances. The use and intent of these bells is evident from these words : " And it shall be upon Aaron to minister, and his sound shall be heard when he goeth in unto the holy place before the Lord, and when he cometh out, that he die not." The sound of the numerous bells that covered the hem ot his garment, gave notice to the assembled people that the most awful ceremony of their religion had commenced. When arrayed in this garb, he bore into the sanctuary the vessel of incense ; it was the signal to prostrate themselves before the Deity, and to commence those fervent ejacula- tions which were to ascend with the column of that incense to the throne of heaven. "One indispensable ceremony in the Indian Pooja is the ringing of a small bell by the officiating brahmin. The women of the idol, or dancing girls of the pagoda, have little golden bells fastened to their feet, the soft harmonious tinkling of which vibrates in unison with the exquisite melody of their voices." (Mau- rice's Indian Antiquities.) " The ancient kings of Persia, who, in fact, united in their own persons the regal and sacerdotal office, were accustomed to have the fringes of their robes adorned with pomegranates and golden bells. The Arabian courtesans, like the Indian women, have little golden bells fastened round their legs, neck, and elbows, to the scund of which they dance before the king. The Arabian princesses wear golden rings on their fingers, to which little bells are suspended, as well as in the flowing tresses of their hair, that their superior rank may be known, and they themselves, in passing, receive the homage due to their exalted station."-CALMET. Ver. 41. And thou shaU put them upon Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him ; and shalt anoint them, and consecrate them, and sanctify them, that they may minister unto me in the priest's office. The Hebrew has for "consecrate," "fill their hands." See also Judges xvii. 5, 12, and 1 Kings xiii. 33, and many other places where the word " consecrate" is in the margir. rendered ^'fill the hand'' Is it not a remarkable fact that the word Kai-Reppi, which signifies, in Tamul, to conse- crate a priest, also means io fill the hand ? When a layman meets a priest, he puts his hands together as an act of reverence, and the priest stretches out his right hand, as if full of something, and says, " Blessings."— Roberts. Chap. 29. ver. 22. Also thou shalt take of the ram the fat and the rump. Or the large tail of one species of the eastern sheep. Russell, {Hist, of Aleppo, p. 51,) afler observing that thev are in that country much more numerous than those with smaller tails, adds, " this tail is very broad and large, ter- minating in a small appendix that turns back upon it. It is of a substance between fat and marrow, and is not eaten separately, but mixed with the lean meat in many of their dishes, and also often used instead of butter. A common sheep of this sort, without the head, feet, skin, and entrails weighs about twelve or fourteen Aleppo rotoloes, of which the tail is usually three rotoloes or upwards ; but suc'.v as are of the largest breed, and have been fattened, will some- times weigh above thirty rotoloes, and the tail of these ten. These very large sheep, being about Aleppo kept up in yards, are in no danger of injuring their tails : but in some other places, where they feed in the fields, the shepherds are obliged to fix a piece of thin board to the under part of their tail, to prevent its being torn by bushes and thistles, as it is not covered underneath with thick wool like the Chap. 38. EXODUS. 69 upper part. Some have small wheels to facilitate the dragging of this board after them." A rotoloe of Aleppo is five pounds. With this agrees the account given by the Abbe Mariti, {Travels through Cyprus.) "The mutton is iuicy and tender. The tails of some of the sheep, which are remarkably fine, weigh upwards of fifty pounds." This ghows us the reason why, in the levitical sacrifices, the tail was always ordered to be consumed by fire. — Burder. Ver, 24. For I will cast out the nations before thee, and enlarge thy borders: neither shall any man desire thy land, when thou shalt go up to appear before the Lord thy God thrice in the year. I find in Exod. xxxiv. 24, a very remarkable promise of God, which could hardly have been fulfilled in the common course of providence, and without a miracle, unless the Israelites and other neighbours had in their wars observed a certain law of truce, quite strange to us, and which I only know from the customs of the Arabs. Moses com- mands all the males of Israel to leave their homes thrice a year, and celebrate a festival for a week at the place where the tabernacle should be erected; assuring them, withal, that during this period, no rtmn should desire their land; and that, therefore, however distant their abodes might be from the sanctuary, they might undertake this journey with perfect safety.' According to the present course of things in the world, this is quite incomprehensi- ble. Were all the males to leave certain parts of the country, and still more, the fortified cities, the greatest of all wonders would be, the enemy with whom the nation happened to be at war, refraining from seizing the oppor- tunity to occupy the fortresses, — to plunder and burn the open country,— and to forage the corn-fields. And it is most obvious, that the danger of all this will be still greater among nations who do not maintain settled peace with each other ; of which description were the marauding Arabs: or who carry on war rather by incursions than regular campaigns, and have no other object than to make booty in money, produce, women, and children. Shall we then venture so to expound the words of Moses, as if he had promised a periodical miracle from God, which should, for three weeks every year, convert all the enemies of the Israelites into statues 1 A promise so incredible, will, perhaps, not appear to be necessary, when, to illus- trate this point, we call in the aid of the customs of the Arabs, who are Abraham's descendants, and the immediate brethren of the Israelites. In all their wars, and even amid their family feuds, during the holy month, in which they solemnized the festival at Mecca, they had a truce. Mohammed's greatest transgression is, that he is said to have broken this truce. Yet, in the Koran, he has commanded his followers to keep it only when their adversaries keep it ; and he permits them to fight against the enemy during the holy month, only when he makes the first attack. Thus we see, in like manner, from 1 Kings xii. 27, that among the Israelites, during the high festivals, a suspension of arms .took place ; and the ten tribes who had revolted from the family of David, might, without hinderance, have kept the feast "at Jerusalem, and would have done so, had not Jeroboam, for political reasons, endeavoured to prevent them. The Judahites, therefore, did not put any obstacle in their way ; and they would the7i have been in as perfect security at Jerusalem, as, before Mohammed's time, every Arab during the holy month was at Mecca. It would ap- pear, then, that the nations related to the Israelites, paid equal respect to the worship of God, and made a truce during war, whenever the people celebrated a festival. But probably the Canaanites were, both in religion and manners, so difierent from the Israelites, that they did not observe any such truce ; for Moses expressly says on this occasion, that God would destroy the Canaanites; and then, no other people would conceive any desire to attack the land of Israel during the seasons of the festivals. Now such a law of nations once introduced, God might fulfil his promise in the common course of providence, and without the aid of a miracle. This sacred truce, which is, however, quite unsuitable to the more connected operations of modern warfare, was likewise probably the cause, wherefore the commandment respecting the Sabbath could be given without any particular limitation. For on that day, all labour was prohibited. Moses does not, indeed, expressly specify fighting, marching, intrenching ; but neither does he expressly except them. Now although, in a rational consideration "df the matter, the justice of these exceptions, in cases of necessity, is manifest ; this silence seems, nevertheless, to be a defect in the law ; and a nation who in this point had even the smallest scruple of con- science, would make but a poor figure in war. We see in fact, that after the Babylonish captivity, when, as St Paul says, (Heb. viii. 7—13,) the law began to be useless from its antiquity, the observance of the Sabbath became very prejudicial to the Jews in their wars with the Syrians and Romans. For the former on the Sabbath attacked them, and burnt thousands of them in a cave, without their making any resistance: and the latter, in their first siege of Jerusalem under Pompey, carried on the works of in- vestment undisturbed, and only guarded against attempt- ing to storm the city, because against a storm the Jews de- fended themselves even on the Sabbath. But since, before the captivity, we never find, that in their numerous wars, the Sabbath had been detrimental to the Jews, or that any of their enemies availed himself of the advantage it gave him ; the Israelites must either, from ancient and undoubt- ed usage, have known that the commandment concerning the Sabbath did not extend to the operations of war; or else, betwixt them and all the neighbouring nations there must on this day have been a sacred truce. Among the latter, this day, which the Israelites dedicated to the Creator of the heavens and the earth, was probably sacred to Saturn, to whom the Phoenicians paid the highest veneration; be- cause, before his being raised to divine honours, or num- bered among the stars, he is said to have been king of their country. According to the testimony of Diodorus Siculus, they accounted him the chief of the planets ; and the Ara- bians had, in like manner, dedicated to him their national temple, the Caaba at Mecca. — Michaelis. Chap. 38. ver. 8. And he made the laver o/ brass and the foot of it of brass, of the looking-glasses of the women assembling, which assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. The eastern mirrors were made o( polished steel, and for the most part convex. If they were thus made in the country of Elihu, the image made use of by him will appear very lively. " Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking-glass T' (Job xxxvii. 18.) Shaw informs us, that " in the Levant looking-glasses are a part of female dress. The Moorish women in Barbary are so fond of their ornaments, and particularly of their looking-glasses, which they hang upon their breasts, that they will not lay them aside, even when, after the drudgery of the day, they are obliged to go two or three miles with a pitcher, or a goat's skin, to fetch water." The Israelitish women used to carry their mirrors with them, even to their most solemn place of worship. The word mirror should be used in the passages here referred to, rather than those which are inserted in the present translation of the Bible. To speak of looking glasses made of steel, and glasses molten, is palpably absurd ; whereas the term mirror obviates every difficulty, and expresses the true meaning of the original. — Burder. LEVITICUS. CHAPTER II. Ver. 4. And if thou bring an oblation of a meat- offering baken in the oven, it shall be unleaven- ed cakes of fine flour mingled with oil, or un- leavened wafers anointed with oil. What attracted our attention most this stormy day, was the apparatus for warming us. It was the species of oven called tannoor, common throughout Armenia and also in Syria, but converted here for purposes of warmth into what is called a tandoor. A cylindrical hole is simk about three feet in the ground in some part of the room, with a flue en- tering it at the bottom to convey a current of air to the fire which heats it. For the emission of smoke no other pro- vision is made than the open sky-light in the terrace. When used for baking bread, the dough, being flattened to the thickness of common pasteboard, perhaps a foot and a half long by a foot broad, is stuck to its smooth sides by means of a cushion, upon which it is first spread. It indicates, by cleaving off", when it is done, and being then packed down in the family chest, it lasts at least a month in the winter, and ten days in the summer. Such is the only bread known in the villages of Armenia ; and even the cities of Erivan and Tebriz offer no other variety than a species perhaps only twice as thick, and so long that it might almost be sold by the yard. To bake it, the bottom of a large oven is covered with pebbles, (except one corner, where a fire is kept constantly burning,) and upon them when heated, the sheets of dough are spread. The convenience of such thin bread, where knives and forks are not used, and spoons are rare, is, that a piece of it doubled enables you to take hold of a mouthful of meat more delicately than with your bare fingers ; or, when properly folded, helps you to convey a spoonful safely to your mouth, to be eaten with the spoon itself. When needed for purposes of warmth, the tannoor is easily transformed into a tandoor. A round stone is laid upon the mouth of the oven, when well heated, to stop the draught ; a square frame, about a foot in height, is then placed above it; and a thick coverlet, spread over the whole, lies upon the ground around'it, to confine the warmth. Thjp family squat upon the floor, and warm themselves by extending their legs and hands into the heated air beneath it, while the frame holds, as occasion requires, their lamp or their food. Its economy is evidently great. So full of crevices are the houses, that an open fireplace must con- sume a great quantity of fuel, and then almost fail of warming even the air in its immediate vicinity. The tan- door heated once, or at the most twice in twenty-four hours, by a small quantity of fuel, keeps one spot continually warm for the relief of all numb fingers and frozen toes. The house, apparently the best in the village, was built throughout, floor, walls, and terrace, of mud. Fortunately, as its owner had two wives, it had two rooms. The one assigned us, being the principal family apartment, was of course filled with every species of dirt, vermin, and litter; and withal, as they were in the midst of the process of bak- ing, the insufferable smoke of the dried cow-dung which heated their tannoor, or cylindrical oven, detained us a long time before we could take possession. Persuaded at last by impatience that the bread must be done, I entered, and found our host and chief muleteer shaking their shirts in the oven, to dislodge the "crawling creatures" that in- habited them. Though new to us then, we afterward found reason to believe that this use of the tannoor is common, and for it alone we have known it to be heated. In such ovens was our bread baked, by being stuck upon their sides, *ind tnough we would fain have quieted our fastidiousness by imagining that they were purified by fire, the nature of trie fuel of which that was almost invariably made, left little room upon which to found such a conception. And as for the loathsome company of which our host and mule- teer had thus attempted to rid themselves, we found them too constantly affecting our senses to think of imagining them away; for the traveller can hardly journey a day here, or in any part of Turkey, without their annoying him, and his only relief is in a constant change of his linen. The apartment was finally cleared and swept, but the old man could give us neither carpet nor mat, and our own painted canvass and travelling carpets were all that cover- ed the ground on which we sat and slept. — Smith and DWIGHT. Mr. Jackson, in his Journey over land from India, gives an account of an eastern oven, equally instructive and amusing, as it confirms the statements of ancient travellers, and shows the surprising expertness of the Arabian women in baking their bread. " They have a small place built with clay, between two and three feet high, having a hole at the bottom for the convenience of drawing out the ashes, something similar to a lime-kiln." The oven, (which he thinks the most proper name for this place,) is usually about fifteen inches wide at top, and gradually widening to the bottom. It is heated with wood; and when suffi- ciently hot, and perfectly clear from the smoke, having nothing but clear embers at the bottom, which continue to reflect great heat, they prepare the dough in a large bowl, and mould the cakes to the desired size on a board, or stone, placed near the oven. After they have kneaded the cake to a proper consistence, they pat it a little, then toss it about with great dexterity in one hand, till it is as thin as they choose to make it. They then wet one side of it with water, at the same time wetting the hand and arm with which they put it into the oven. The side of the cake adheres fast tothe side of the oven, till it is sufficiently baked, when, if not paid proper attention to, it would fall down among the embers. If they were not exceedingly quick at this work, the heat of the oven would burn their arms ; but they perform it with such an amazing dexterity, that one woman will continue keeping three or four cakes in the oven at once, till she has done baking. This mode, he adds, requires not half the fuel that is consumed in.Eu- rope. — Paxton. CHAPTER VII. Ver. 9. And the meat-offering that is baken in the oven, and all that is dressed in the frying- pan, and in the pan, shall be the priest's that offereth it. Our translation of this passage, presents a confusioa more easily perceived than regulated by the general read- er : — " And all the meat-offering that is baken in the oven, and all that is dressed in the f ryingpan, and in the pan, shall be the priest's that offers it." It is evident that here are three terms used, implying three different manners of dressing food. — Do we understand theml The term, " meat-offering" is certainly unfortunate here, as it raises the idea of flesh-meat, without just reason, to say the least, especially as it stands connected with baking in the oven, nun. Passing this, the folloMang sentence, also, as it stands connected, expresses a meat-offering, dressed in a frying- pan, nttrniD ; and then we have another kind of meat-oflfer- ing, dressed in the pan, nana. Of what nature is this pan 1 To answer this question, we must dismiss the flesh-meat. Whether the following extract from Denon may contribute assistance on this subject, is submitted with great defer- ence. It is his explanation of his plate lxxxv. " The manner of making macaroni, in Egypt. — The manufactory, and the shop for selling it, are both at once in the street ; — an oven, over which a great plate of copper is heated ; the maker sheds on it a thin and liquid paste, which is strain- ed through the holes in a kind of cup which he passes uj r Chap. 7- LEVITICUS, 71 and down on the plate : after a few minutes, the threads of paste are hardened, dried, and baked, by a uniform de- gree of heat, maintained without intermission, by an equal quantity of branches of palm-tree, by which the oven is kept constantly heated. The same degree of heat is given in the same space of time to an equal quantity of macaroni; which is perpetually renewed on the plate, and sold direct- ly as it is made." — Taylor in Calmet. Ver. 12. If he offer it for a thanksgiving, then he shall offer with the sacrifice of thanksgiving unleavened cakes mingled with oil, and un- leavened wafers anointed with oil, and cakes mingled with oil, of fine flour, fried. With the exception of two rare cases, oil was order- ed to accompany every meal-offering, in order to its being therewith prepared, and baked into cakes. With this law, in so far as it is perhaps typical, and regards a holy ceremony, I have here nothing to do, because I consider it merely with respect to its political influence in the state ; and that, among a people brought out of Egypt into Pales- tine, and still always hankering after Egypt, was important. It imperceptibly attached them to their new country, and served to render even the idea of a future residence in Egypt, irksome ; while it also imperceptibly gave them an inclination to cultivate the olive-tree, for which nature seems to have pre-eminently adapted Palestine. In the greatest part of Egypt, according to Strabo, no olives were cultivated. It was only in the Heracleotic canton, that they came to such perfection as that oil could be made from them. In the gardens around Alexandria, (which, how- ever,, did not exist in the time of the ancient kings, that part of the country being an uncultivated waste till the reign of Alexander the Great,) there were olive-trees, but no oil was made. The consequence of this want of oil was, (as it still is,) that in Egypt they made use of butter, as we do, and also of honey, in their pastry : and even at this day, travellers, going from Egypt into Ara*bia, carry butter along with them ; although, indeed, it is not very tempting to the appetite, because, in consequence of the great heat, it generally melts in the jars by the way. In those parts of Arabia likewise, which the Israelites traversed, and in which they might, perhaps, have thought of settling as wan- dering herdsmen; scarcely any olives were produced. The oil of Palestine, on the other hand, was not only most abundant, but also peculiarly excellent ; and Hasselquist prefers it even to that of Provence. By this gift of na- ture, stony places and mountains, which would otherwise have been barren, became not only useful, but even more productive, than the best fields could be made. The only part of Palestine which Strabo, that much misquoted au- thor, describes as imfruitful, is that about Jerusalem; and it really is so, in regard to the production of grain : but still the Jews say, that an acre about Jerusalem was for- nierly of much more value that in any other part of Pales- tine. This I should not believe on their word, if any de- gD|e of improbability attached to it ; for Jewish accounts frrnn hearsay and oral tradition, have little weight with me. But as long as Palestine was properly cultivated, an acre near Jerusalem, from its produce in wine and oil, must naturally have been more profitable, than as a corn- field. We need only call to mind the Mount of Olives, which lay to the east of the city. An acre planted with olives or vines, however rocky and arid the soil may be, will very easily be made worth ten times as much as an acre of the richest corn-land. — The account given by Abul- feda, in his Description of Syria, confirms this statement ; for he says, that the country about Jerusalem is one of the hiost fertile in Palestine. Let us now represent to ourselves the effects of a law which enjoined, that the pastry of of- ferings should be baked with oil, (and, therefore, not with butter,) and that to every meal-offering so much oil should be added. The priests, who, among the Hebrews, were persons of distinction by birth, were accustomed to oil-pas- try; and as their entertainments were generally offering- feasts, the people thus became acquainted with it. Now, what people have once tasted as a luxury at a feast, and found savoury, or heard of as eaten by the great, they begin first to imitate sparingly, and then, if they can, more and more frequently in their daily meals. This was an infallible means to accustom the Israelite?, to oil-pastry, with which, whoever is once acquainted, will always pre- fer it to that made with butter. For if the oil is fresh and good, it tastes much better ; to which add, that as butter is very liable to spoil, it then communicates to pastry, and every other sort of meat, a disagreeable by-taste. — The worst faults in cookery arisf from bad butter. This is a general maxim with our German housewives, particularly in Southern Germany. The natural consequences, then, of the use of oil-pastry, as now mentioned, were, in the first place, that the olive-tree, which formed so principal a source of the riches of the new country of the Israelites, came to be more carefully cultivated, and thus its natural treasures properly improved ; and, in the next place, that the people at length lost their desire of returnmg back to Egypt. That in the time of Moses, they .often thought of Egypt with regret, and were even inclined to return to their ancient bondage, we know from his own accounts. Indeed, Xheiv penchant for this their ancient country was so strong and permanent, that he found it necessary to intro- duce into the fundamental and unalterable laws of ihe gov- ernment, as affecting the king, an express ordinance against all return to Egypt, Deut. xvii. 16. No sooner, however, would the Israelite become rightly acquainted with the chief of nature's gifts to his new country, and accustomed to the use of wine and oil, than his longing after a country, which produced neither, would totally cease. In fact, the object which the statutes, now considered, most probably had in view, was so completely attained, that, 1. Butter was entirely disused among the Israelites. In the whole Hebrew Bible, which contains so many other economical terms, we do not once find the word for butter ; for 7\H'0T\^ which in Job xx. 17. xxix. 6. Deut. xxxii. 14. Judg. V. 25. Isa. vii. 15, 16, 22, is commonly so translated, does not mean butter, but thick milk. It would therefore appear, that butter had been as rarely to be seen in Pales- tine, as it now is in Spain ; and that "the people had made use of nothing but oil in their cookery, as being more de- licious. The reason why the LXX. have improperly ren- dered it butler, was this ; that their Greek version was made by Egyptian Jews, who, from the want of oil in their new country, were accustomed to the use of butter only. 2. From the time of Joshua until the destruction of their government, the desire of returning to Egypt never once arose among the Israelites. It was only after Nebuchad- nezzar had destroyed Jerusalem, and when the remnant of the people no longer thought themselves secure against similar disasters within Palestine, that, contrary to the di- vine prohibition, the Jews took refuge in Egypt, Jer. xlii. xliv. ; and when the kingdom of the ten tribes' was destroy- ed, and Samaria conquered by the Assyrians, many of the Israelites, as we must infer from Hosea, in like manner withdrew thither. — Michaelis. Ver. 26. Moreover, ye shall eat no manner of blood, whether it be of fowl, or of beast, in any of your dwellings. With the prohibition of fat, we find in tioo passages (Lev. iii. 17, and vii. 26, 27,) another prohibition joined, that of eating blood; which, however, occurs also in f.vc other passages, (Lev. xvii. 10 — 14. xix. 26. Deut. xii. 16, 23, 24. XV. 23 ;) and was binding, not only on the Israelites themselves, but also on all foreigners living among them, under the penalty of death : Lev. xvii. 10. This unusuallv frequent recurrence of the prohibition, together with the punishment of extirpation from among the people, annexed to the transgression of it ; and the denunciation of God's JDeculiar vengeance against every man who should eat blood, is quite sufficient to show, that the legislator must have been more interested in this, than in the other prohi- bitions relative to unclean meats, and likewise that the Israelites had had peculiar temptations to transgress it. These we really should not have, were blood forbidden to us ; and one should think that the person who had not, from infancy, eaten blood, would rather have an antipathy at it. Bloodpuddings, it is true, (like goose and hare,) boiled black, we eat with great relish ; but I cannot recollect to have found any person pre-eminently fond of them, but in the single case of their being quite fresh ; and that would be the precise case, in which, to a person not previously accustomed to eat them, they would at first be most likely 72 LEVITICUS. Chap. 11. to cause sensations of abhorrence. Add to this, that blood- puddings of ox-blood are by no means so savoury, as ours made of swine's blood are; which cannot, however, be here in question. For they have something of a mealy taste ; which, mdeed, is very perceptible, when ox-blood is fraud- ulently mixed with swine's blood. The temptation, there- fore, which the Israelites had had to violate this law, must have proceeded from anothef cause, than from an appetite for blood ; and so much the more so, as the eating of blood would appear to have never been a custom of their ances- tors; for even the Arabs, who are descended from Abraham, do not eat blood ; and Mohammed (as we have seen,) has forbidden them to taste of idol-oflerings and blood of beasts strangled, torn, or dead, and of swine's flesh. But before I proceed to state the cause of this so remarkably rigid prohibition of blood, I must observe, that it only extended to the blood of quadrupeds and birds ; for the blood of fishes was, on the contrary, permitted to be eaten ; Lev. vii. 26, xvii. 13. This point is so clear, that even our modern Jews, who in most things overstretch the law of Moses, make no conscience of eating carp stewed in their own blood. I now come to notice the reason of this prohibition, which we find so urgently repeated. It is connected with one of the grand objects, which the Hebrew legislator always had in view, namely, the exclusion of all manner of idolatry from among his people. Eating of blood, or rather drinking it, was quite customary among the pagan nations of Asia, in their sacrifices to idols, and in the taking of oaths. This, indeed, was so much an Asiatic, and in a Particular manner, a Phoenician usage, that we find the Loman writers taking notice of it, as something outlandish at Rome, and peculiar to these nations; and as in the Roman persecutions, the Christians were compelled to burn incense, so were they, in the Persian, to eat blood. In the West the one, and in the East the other, was re- garded as expressive of conversion to heathenism; because both were idolatrous practices. It was for this very reason, that Moses now prohibited blood so rigidly, and under the pain of death, not only among the Israelites themselves, but among all foreigners that lived within their land ; and in order to render the prohibition the more sacred, and the more revered, by connecting with it a moral implication, God declared, (Lev. xvii. 11 — 14,) That the Israelites, on account of the sins which they daily committed, and tohich could never be fully expiated by offerings on the altar, owed to him all the blood of the beasts which they slaughtered, and were 7iot to eat of it, becaiose it was destined as an atonement for their sins. But for this very reason also, because it was an idolatrous usage among the neighbouring nations, were the Israelites in the greater danger of being led, by eating blood, into idolatry, from their great propensity to that universally-prevalent crime, and not from mere fondness for blood as a desirable article of food. In regard to many other heathenish customs, Moses acted quite otherwise, consecrating, instead of prohibiting them, by commanding that they should be kept up, under an altered signification, in honour of the true God ; but it is not to be wondered that he should not have done so with regard to the drink- ing of blood in sacrifices and oaths, but rather have forbidden the use of it altogether. The eating of blood is a matter of indifference in a moral view, and, if not carried to excess, in a medical view also. It will not make a man cruel and pitiless ; nor yet will it occasion disease and death. But drinking of blood is certainly not a becoming ceremony in religious worship. It is not a very refined custom, and if often repeated, it might probably habituate a people to cruelty, and make them unfeeling with regard to blood ; and certainly religion should not give, nor even have the appearance of giving, any such direction to the manners of a nation. Add to this, that it is actually dangerous to drink blood ; for if taken warm, and in large quantity, it may prove fatal; particularly ox-blood, which, by coagulating in the stomach, causes convulsions and sudden death, and was with this view given to criminals in Greece, as a poisoned draught. It is true, the blood of other animals may not always produce the same effects ; but still, if it is not in very small quantity, its effects will be hurtful. At any rate, the custom of "drinking blood in sacrifice, and in taking oaths, may, from imprudence, sometimes have the same effects which Valerius Maximus ascribes to it, in the case of Themistocles ; only that he purposely drank as much during a sacrifice, as was suffi- cient to kill him ; which others might also do from inad- vertence, or from superstitious zeal. This was sufficient reason to keep Moses irom making the drinking of blood a part of religious worship ; and this being the case, it was, as a heathen rite, on his principles, necessarily prohibited in the strictest terms. Nor need we, after this, be surprised to find the eating of blood forbidden, not only in the Acts of the Apostles, (chap. xv. 20 — 29,) but also among the Arabs, and in the Koran, and classed with the offerings made to idols : for it actually was a part of idolatrous worship very common in the East. — Michaelis. * CHAPTER XI. Ver. 2. Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, These are the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that are on the earth. Of the laws relative to clean and unclean beasts, which are recorded in Lev. xi. and Deut. xiv., the following may, perhaps, serve as an abstract, sufficient for a reader wliu) has not to observe them, but means only to contemplate them philosophically. In regard to quadrupeds, Moses reduces the previous cus- toms of the Israelites, together with the additional ordi- nances which he found it necessary to make, into a very simple and natural system. According to him. All beasts that have their feet completely cloven, above as well as below, and at the same time chew the cud, are clean. Those which have neither, or indeed want one of these distinguishing marks, are unclean. That in so early an age of the world, we should find a systematic division of quadrupeds so ex- cellent, as never yet, after all the improvements in natural history, to have become obsolete, but, on the contrary, to be still considered as useful by the greatest masters .of the science, cannot but be looked upon as truly wonderful. In the case of certain quadrupeds, however, a doubt may arise, whether they do fully divide the hoof, or ruminate. For example, whether the hare ruminates or not, is so un- decided, that if we put the question to any two sportsmen, we shall rarely receive the same answer. In such cases, to prevent difficulties, a legislator must authoritatively de- cide ; by which I do not mean, that he is to prescribe to naturalists what their belief should be, but only to deter- mine, for the sake of expounders or judges of the law, what animals are to be regarded as ruminating or parting the hoof. The camel ruminates, but whether it fully parts tlie hoof, is a question so undecided, that we do not, even in the Memoirs of the Academy of Paris, find a satisfactory answer to it on all points. The foot of the camel is actu- ally divided into two toes, and the division even below is complete, so that the animal might be accounted clean ; but then it does not extend the whole length of the foot, but only to the forepart ; for behind it is not parted, and we find, besides, under it, and connected with it, a ball on which the camel goes. Now, in this dubious state of cir- cumstances, Moses authoritatively declares, (Lev. xi. 4,) that the camel has not the hoof fully divided. It would ap- pear as if he had meant that this animal, heretofore ac- counted clean by the Ishmaelites, Midianites, and all Jhe rest of Abraham's Arabian descendants, should not be eaten by the Israelites; probably with a view to keep them, by this "means, the more separate from these nations, with whom their connexion, and their coincidence in manners, was otherwise so close; and perhaps too, to prevent them, from conceiving any desire to continue in Arabia, or to! devote themselves again to their favourite occupation of wandering herdsmen. For in Arabia, a people will always be in an uncomfortable situation, if they dare not eat the- flesh and drink the milk of the camel. With regard Xo fishes, Moses has in like manner made a very simple systematic distinction. All that have scales and fins are clean : all others unclean. Of birds, without founding on any systematic distriDU- tion, he merely specifies certain sorts as forbidden, thereby permitting allothers to be eaten; but what the prohibited Ijirds are, it is, from our ignorance of the language, in some instances impossible to ascertain ; and the Jews, who still consider the Mosaic law as obligatory, are here placed in the awkward predicament of not understanding a statute which they have to observe, and of expoimding it merely bv guess. ' Insects, serpents, worms, &c. are prohibited ; and Moses I Chap. 13. LEVITICUS. 73 IS especially careful to interdict the use of various sorts of lizards ; which, of course, must have been eaten in some parts of Egypt, or by the people in the adjacent countries ; but concerning which, I must admit, that I have not met with any account besides. There is, indeed, as we find from Hasselauist's Travels in Palestine, (under the cla,ss Amphibia, Ivii.) one species of lizard in that country, viz. the Gecko, which is poisonous ; so much so, that its poison Icills when it happens to be among meat. This is not the t;ase with the poison of serpents, which is only noxious in A wound, and may, as well as the animals themselves, which are edible, be safely taken into the stomach, if only the mouth be perfectly sound, and free from bloody spots. Tliis Lacerta Gecko must certainly not have been eaten by any of the neighbouring nations, and Moses had therefore no occasion to prohibit it. With regard, however, to those winged insects, which besides four walking legs, {Pedes saltatorii,) Moses makes an exception, and under the de- nomination of locusts, declares them clean in all their four stages of existence, and under as many different degrees of hardness. In Palestine, Arabia, and the adjoining coun- ix*es, locusts are one of the most common articles of food, ana the people would be very ill off if they durst not eat them. For when a swarm of them desolates the fields, they prove, in some measure, themselves an antidote to the famine which they occasion ; so much so, indeed, that poor people look forward with anxiety to the arrival of a swarm of locusts, as yielding them sustenance without any trouble. They are not only eaten fresh, immediately on their ap- pearance ; but the people collect them, and know a method of preserving them for a long time for food, after they have dried them in an oven. I'he law further prohibited the touching the carcass of any unclean beast, Lev. xi. 8, 24, 25, 27, 31. This, how- ever, does not mean that a carcass was, in a literal sense, never to be touched, (for then it must always have been in the way, and we shall see in the sequel that it was expressly ordered to be buried ;) but only, that the person who touch- ed it, was to be deemed unclean until the evening. To strangers who dwelt among the Israelites, unclean beasts were not forbidden: for certainly the legislator never thought of making his prohibition of certain meats a moral law, by which every man, of whatever nation, was to be bound to regulate his conduct. If his design in these sta- tutes was to separate the Israelites from other nations, it must have been his wish and intention to prohibit the for- mer from the use of those very meats which were eaten by the latter ; and had the people in any of the surrounding countries deemed all such meats unclean, Moses would probably have given a set of laws on this subject quite dif- ferent from those which he did give. When a commander gives his soldiers a cockade to distinguish them from other troops, he by no means wishes that everybojdy should in- discriminately wear it, but would rather have it taken from any foreigner who should mount it. The law relative to clean and unclean beasts was never, not even under the Old Testament, a precept of religion w^hich every individual, to whatever nation he belonged, was bound to observe for the sake of his eternal salvation ; it was only, if I may so term it, a cockade for the Israelites ; but still one that they could not omit wearing without committing a trespass of a divine commandment ; and indeed it was so firmly pinned upon them by their earliest education, that it must certainly have been difficult for them ever to lay it aside. — Michaelis. Ver. 33. And every earthen vessel whereinto any of them falleth, whatsoever is in it shall be un- clean ; and ye shall break it. This refers to any unclean or dead animal falling into or touching an earthen vessel. Most of the cooking uten- sils of the Hindoos are of earthen ware. Should an un- clean, or dead animal, or insect, touch or fall into tliem, they must be broken. Nay, should a person of low caste get a look at the cooking vessels of a Brahmin, or one of the Saiva sect, they will immediately be broken ; and no small portion of abuse be poured upon the offending indi- vidual. Should an unfortunate dog, in his prowlings, find his way into the kitchen, and begin to lick the vessels, wo be to him ! for he Avill not only have hard words, but hard blows ; and then follows the breaking of the vessels. On 10 this account, the Brahmins, and others, concea^ their earth en ware when not in use. — Roberts. Ver. 35. And every thing whereupon any part of their carcass falleth shall be unclean ; whether it he oven, or ranges for pots, they shall be broken down ; for they are unclean, and shall be unclean unto you. The scarcity of fuel in the East mduces the people to be very frugal in using it. Rauwolff gives the following ac- count of their management: " They make in their tents or houses a hole about a foot and a half deep, wherein they put their earthen pipkins or pots, with the meat in them, closed up, so that they are in the half above the middle. Three fourth parts thereof they lay about with stones, and the fourth part is left open, through which they fling in their dried dung, which burns immediately, and gives so great a heat that the pot groweth so hot as if it had stood in the middle of a lighted coal heap, so that they boil their meat with a little fire, quicker than we do ours with a great one on our hearths." As the Israelites must have had as much occasion to be sparing of their fuel as any people, and especially when journeying in the wilderness, Mr. Harmer considers this quotation as a more satisfactory commentary on this passage than any which has been giv- en. — BURDER. CHAPTER XIII. Ver. 3. And the priest shall look on the plague in the skin of the flesh : and when the hair in the plague is turned white, and the plague in sight he deeper than the skin of his flesh, it is a plague of leprosy : and the priest shall look on him, and pronounce him unclean. The leprosy, a contagious and dreadful disorder, which slowly consumes the human body, which is common, par- ticularly in Egypt and Syria, but is also met with in other hot countries, generally manifests itself first in the manner described in the text. Peysonnel, a French physician, who was sent by his government, in the year 1756, to the island of Gaudaloupe, to examine the leprosy which had appeared there, writes in his report of 3d February, 1757, (in Michaelis Mosaic Law, part iv. p. 224 :) " The commence- ment of the leprosy is imperceptible ; there appear only a few dark reddish spots on the skin of the whites; in the blacks they are of a coppery red. These spots are at first not attended with pain, or any other symptom, but they can- not be removed by any means. The disease increases im- perceptibly, and continues for some years to be more and more manifest. The spots become larger, and spread in- discriminately over the skin of the whole body : they are sometimes rather raised, though flat; when the disease increases, the upper part of the nose swells, the nostrils dis- tend, and the nose itself becomes soft. Swellings appear on the jaw-bones, the eyebrows are elevated, the ears grow thick, the ends of the fingers, as well as the feet and toes, swell, the nails grow scaly, the joints on the hands and feet separate and die off"; on the palms of the hands and the soles of the feet there are deep dry ulcers, which rapid- ly increase, and then vanish again. In short, when the disease reaches its last stage, the patient becomes horrible, and falls to pieces. All these circumstances come on very slowly, for many years are often required before they all occur ; the patient has no severe pain, but he feels a kind of numbness in his hands and feet. These persons are not hindered, during the time, in any of the functions of na- ture, they eat and drink as usual, and even when some of their fingers and toes die off", the loss of the member is the only consequence, for the wound heals of itself without at- tention or medicine. But when the poor people reach this last period of the disease, they are horribly disfigured and most worthy of pity. It has "been observed, that this dis- ease has other dreadful properties, such, in fact, that it is hereditary, and, therefore, some families are more afflicted with it than others ; secondly, that it is infectious, and that it is propagated by persons sleeping together, or even hav- ing long-continued intercourse ; thirdly, that it is incurable, or, at least, that no means to cure it have been discovered. 74 LEVITICUS. Chap. !?> A very well-grounded fear of being infected with this cruel disease, the difficulty of recognising the persons attacked with it, before the disorder has attained its height; the length of time that it remains secret, from the care of the patients to conceal it ; the uncertainty of the symptoms at the beginning, which should distinguish it from other dis- orders, excited extraordinary claims among all the inhabit- ants of this island. They were suspicious of each, because virtue and rank were no protection agai^J^st this cruel scourge. They called this disease the leprosy, and pre- sented to the commander and governor several petitions, in which they represented all the above circumstances ; the general food, the uneasiness caused in this newly-settled country; the inconveniences and the hatred which such in- culpations produced among them ; the laws which had been made against lepe.rs, and their exclusion from civil society. They demanded a general inspection of all those who were suspected of having this disease, in order that those who were found to be. infected might be removed into a particular hospital, or some separate place." All that these people required, and which was also granted them, we find to be prescribed in the laws relative to the leprosy, contained in the thirteenth chapter. — Rosenmuller. Ver. 38. If a man also or a woman have in the skin of their flesh bright spots, even white bright spots ; 39. Then the priest shall look : and, be- hold, if the bright spots in the skin of their flesh be darkish white; it is a freckled spot that groweth in the skin : he is clean. The Hebrew word here translated "freckled spot," is Bohak, and the Arabs still use the same word to denote a kind of leprosy, of which Niebuhr says, " Bohak is neither contagious nor dangerous. A black boy at Mocha, who was affected with this eruption, had here and there on his body white spots. "We were told that the use of sulphur had relieved this boy for a time, but had not entirely removed the disease." He adds, subsequently, from Fors- kaVs papers, the following particulars : " On the 15th of May, 1765, I myself first saw the eruption called bohak in a Jew at Mocha. The spots of this eruption are of unequal size ; thev do not shine, are imperceptibly higher than the skin, and do not change the colour of the hair. Their colour is a dirty white, or rather reddish. The rest of the skin of the patient I saw was darker than the inhabitants of the country usually were, but the spots were not so white as the skin of a European when it is not tanned by the sun. The spots of this eruption do not appear on the hands or near the navel, but on the neck and face, yet not that part of the face where the hair grows thick. They spread gradually. Sometimes they remain only two months, sometimes one or two years, and go away by degrees of themselves. This disorder is neither contagious nor he- reditary, and does not cause any bodily inconvenience." Hence it appears why a person affected with the bohak is declared in the above law not to be unclean, — Rosen- muller. Ver. 45. And the leper in whom the plague is, his clothes shall be rent, and his head bare, and ho, shall put a covering upon his upper lip, and shall cry, Unclean, unclean. Thf prophet Ezekiel, in reference to the death of his wife, was ordered not to " cry," neither to cover the lips ; (the margin has, " upper lip.") The prophet Micah (iii. 7) describes the confusion and sorrow" of those who had by their wickedness offended the Lord. " Then shall the seers be ashamed, and the diviners confounded : yea, they shall all cover their lips, for there is no answer of God." Margin again has, " upper lip." All these passages refer to the sorrow of those concerned. A person in deep distress puts his hand over his mouth, and hangs down his head, as if looking on the ground. When a man suddenly claps his hand on his mouth, it denotes great sorrow or surprise. To put the fingers in a line with the nose, conveys the idea of silence and submission. "Why is your hand on your mouth T'— "Not for joy." "But why'l" — "My son, my son, my wicked son ! He has gone with the evil ones to ihe distant country." " Ah, friend, why is your hand there %" — " Alas, the tigers got among my cattle last night, and great is the slaughter." " The king is angry with Raman — his hand is now on his mouth." " I may well put my hand on my mouth ; I have been taken by the neck, and driven from the presence of my lord. My requests have all been denied." Job xxi. 5. — Roberts. Ver. 47, The garment also that the plague of leprosy is in, whether it be a woollen garment, or a linen garment ; 48. Whether it be in the the warp, or woof, of linen, or of woollen, whether in a skin, or in any thing made of skin : 49. And if the plague be greenish or reddish in the garment, or in the skin, either in the warp, or in the woof, or in any thing of skin ; it 25 a plague of leprosy, and shall be showed unto the priest : 50. And the priest shall look upon the plague, and shut up it that hath the plague seven The two statutes of Moses relative to the leprosy of clothes and houses, may appear to us at first view very strange, because in Europe we have never heard of any such leprosy, and the name immediately suggests to us the idea of something akin to human leprosy. Learned men who write upon the Bible in their closets, sometimes know nothing but books ; being quite unacquainted with nature, and often with their own houses, in which, perhaps, the Mosaic leprosy may actually be ; and they are too much wrapped up in themselves to think of asking the unlearned about such things. Perhaps the leprosy in question does not, properlv speaking, fall to be treated under the present head, but under the statutes of police respecting buildings, manufactures, and clothes. Here, however, it will be looked for; and although it were not, I must nevertheless offer some general remarks on both the laws given by Mo- ses respecting it, which would lose their eflfect, were I to separate the one from the other. In the first place then, when we hear of the leprosy of clothes and houses, Ave must not be so simple as to imagine it the very same disease which is termed leprosy in man. Men, clothes, and stones, have not the same sort of diseases ; but the names of hu- man diseases are, by analogy, or as the grammarian terms it, by a figure of speech, applied to the diseases of other things. In Berne, for instance, they speak of the cancer of build- ings, but then that is not the distemper so called in the hu- man body. The cancer of buildings, is with equal proprie- ty a Swiss, as the leprosy of buildings is a Hebrew, expres- sion. The late Dr. Forskal wrote me from Egypt, that two sorts of diseases of certain trees proceeding from in- sects, are there termed leprosy ; but I do not print the words of his letter, because I am aware that a fuller account of this matter will be found in the Diary of his Travels, which is very soon to be published, and which I should not wish to anticipate. Hasselquist likewise, has, in p. 221 of his Travels in the Holy Land, spoken of a leprosy in the fig- trees. In the second place, although Moses gives laws relative to the leprosy in clothes and houses, we must not imagine, considering that he lets not fall a single word on the sub- ject, that any such leprosy could infect man. Of this Mo- ses is so far from being afraid, that we find him, on the contrary , when a house lies under the suspicion of leprosy, commanding all the articles of furniture to be removed out of it, previous to its inspection, that the priest may not be obliged to pronounce them unclean. If there adhered to the walls any poisonous matter that could pass to humanj beings, and infect strange injunction case of a house ir bring out everv article within it previous to its being exam-^ ined, that it might not be declared infected. What else would the consequence be, than the direct propagation of the infection 1 It would be the very same, though in a less degree, if the house-leprosv infected man. But Avill those who have alreadvanv knowledge of Moses as a legislator, suppose him capable of committing such an oversight ? The leprosy of clothes is described in Lev. xiii.47— 59, as consisting of green or reddish spots that remain in spite of washing, and still spread ; and by which the cloth becomes nice IIICIIJ UllCJCaU. il liH.lt, miin^iv-vx iv/ sonous matter that could pass to humanj t them with leprosy, this wouM be a veryi m indeed. Let us only conceive, in thM infected with the plague, orders given to' Chap. 14. LEVITICUS. 75 bald, or bare, sometimes on the one side, sometimes on the other. This Moses terms dropping or losing the hair ; that is, if we are to give the literal truth of the Hebrew text, in a passage which might have its diflicullies to a man of learning, if he knew nothing of the manufacture of woollen. These symptoms too, of leprosy, are said to be found sometimes only in ihe warp, and at other times only in the woof. To a per- son who has nothing to do with the manufactures of woollen, linen, or leather, but with books only, this must doubtless be obscure ; or, at most, he will be led to think of specks of rot- tenness, bul still without being rightly satisfied. I have not been able lo obtain complete information on this subject; b,;'L in regard to wool, and woollen stuffs, I have consulted t!i ' 'greatest manufacturer in the electorate of Hanover; and he informs me, that what he has read in my German Bible, ai t his passage, will be found to hold good, at any rate with n '^^ard to woollen articles ; and that it proceeds from what i^ ealled dead wool, that is, the wool of sheep that have died by disease, not by the knife; that such wool, if the disease has been but of short duration, is not altogether useless, but in a sheep that has been long diseased, becomes extremely bad, and loses the points; and that, according to the estab- lished usage of honest manufacturers, it is unfair to man- ufacture dead wool into any article worn by man ; because vermin are so apt to establish themselves in it, particular- ly when it is worn close to the body and warmed thereby. When I told him, that in the countries, with a view to which I questioned him, the people, for want of linen and from poverty, had always worn, and still wear, woollen stuffs next the skin, he stated it as his opinion that there the disagreeable effect just mentioned, must take place in a still higher degree than in countries where, according to our German fashion, which would there be a luxury, a linen shirt is worn between the woollen clothes and the body. He added, that dead wool was usually manufactur- ed into sacks and horse-cloths ; and he expressed his wish for a statute, in the style of Moses, which should discour- age the use of dead wool, or inflict a punishment on those who either sold it, or knowingly manufactured it into hu- man clothing. — I am likewise informed by Hamburghers, that in their neighbourhood, many frauds are committed with dead wool, from its being sold for good wool ; in con- sequence of which, the stuffs rrfade of it not only become very soon bare, but full first of little depressions, and then of holes. These accounts serve to render this law pretty intelligi- ble, as far as regards wool and woollen stuffs. We sec how the disease may appear sometimes only in the warp, and sometimes only in the woof, from good wool being used for the one, and diead wool for the other. Whether this dead wool will, in process of time, infect good wool, I do not know; but to bring into complete discredit and disuse, stuffs, which so soon become threadbare, and burst out in holes, and at the same time so readily shelter vermin, al- though they cannot proceed from the wool itself, but only find it a very suitable breeding-place, unquestionably be- comes the duty of legislative policy. How this end could be attained, without destroying stuffs thus manufactured contrary to law, our present system of police can scarcely conceive ; and in that early age of the world, when every thing was yet in its infancy, — when merchants were not so knowing as now, — and when among the petty independent tribes, there was no police established for manufactures, nor any boards of inspection, the trick of using dead wool was probably more frequent than at present ; while yet the cause of its effects was but imperfectly known ; and these effects in those climates must have been still worse than with us, particularly in Egypt, which breeds such abun- dance of vermin. The best remedy was, in the language of Moses, to destroy the leprous article : for that would soon make every one careful to manufacture nothing either for himself, or for sale, that might be pronounced leprous ; and people would soon observe where the fault lay, when they were losers, and found no sale for their goods, in conse- quence of former purchasers having suffered by them. The prohibition of dead wool, although the legislator be ever so fully satisfied that it is entirely to blame for the ef- fects in question, is not sufficient of itself; for it will still be privately manufactured and then denied, particularly where there is no board of survey. But where the stuff, in which leprous symptoms make their appearance, is destroy- ed in spite of the owner, every one will become attentive to guard against such a loss. Moses therefore enjoined, Jirst, that the place on which there were marks of leprosy that no washing could obliterate, should be torn out ; and then, if the leprosy still recurred a second time, that the whole piece should be burnt. With regard to leather and linen, I can say nothing with historical certainty : because I know no great wholesale manufacturer or merchant in either line, and I do not choose to trouble my reader with conjectures, because they may occur to himself, just as well as to me. Perhaps, however, my book may find some readers better acquainted with such persons than I can be here in Gottingen, and who may hereafter communicate with me on the subject ; for which purpose, I particularly request the attention of my readers in Holland, where I am inclined to think the best judges may be found. Now that the origin of the evil has been traced in wool, there will be no great difficulty in carrying on the investigation further. Only I must deprecate closet-accounts, and learned con- jectures. It is only from those who are acquainted with the manufacture or sale of linen, leather, and furriery, on a large scale, that I look for any useful information. — Mi- CHAELIS. CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 4. Then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed two birds alive and clean, and cedar-wood, and scarlet, and Interpreters have not been able to determine in what parts of scripture, the Hebrew term (-i>bs) tsippor, ought to be translated sparrow. Some suppose that Moses intends this bird in the law concerning the purification of the lep- rosy : " Then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed, two birds alive." One of these birds was to be killed over running water ; and the living bird, after certain ceremonies described in the law, was ordered to be let loose into the open field. The same ceremonies were commanded to be observed in cleansing the leprous house. Jerome and many succeeding interpreters, render the word a^-^^o^ used in the law, sparrows. But it is evident from an attentive perusal of the fourth verse, that it signi- fies birds in general. " Then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed, tv^o birds alive and clean." Now, if the sparrow was a clean bird, there could be no use in commanding a clean one to be taken, since every one of the species was ceremonially clean ; bui if it was unclean by law, then it could not be called clean. The term here must therefore signify birds in general, of which some were ceremonially clean, and some unclean ; which rendered the specification in the command, proper and necessary. From the terms of the law it appears, that any species of clean birds might be taken on such occasions, domestic or wild ; provided only they were clean, and the use of them conceaed by the laws of Moses to the people, — Paxton. Ver. 33. And the Lord spake unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying-, 34. When ye be come into the land of Canaan, which I give to you for a possession, and I put the plague of leprosy in a house of the land of your possession ; 35. And he that owneth the house shall come and tell the priest, saying, It seemeth to me there is as it were a plague in the house. The house-leprosy is said in Lev. xiv. 33 — 57, to consist of greenish or reddish dimples, which appear on the walls, and continually spread wider and wider ; and its nature would probably hare been understood long ago, but for the prevalence of the notion of its being a disease communica- ble to man, which notion arose from taking the word lepra-' sy in too literal a sense. The bare description of it given by Moses is so clear, that, I have known more than one example of children, who, shortly after reading it;, having had occasion to go into the cellar, where, with terror, they thought they had observed it on the walls, on their return, described it distinctly or figuratively to their parents, and were laughed at for their pains. Laughed at they certainly ought not to have been, but instructed. Their acu^e vision 76 LEVITICUS. Chap. 14. had shown them what many a learned man has in vain sought to find out. In short, what we usually term the Salt- petre, that appears on walls, has much the same symptoms as the Mosaic house-leprosy, and is at the same time attend- ed with such noxious eifects as require the attention of a well-regulated police. I expressed this idea first in my 12th Cluestion to the Arabian Travellers; but I did so very briefly, and as addressing men of sense and skill. I have not yet, however, received any answer, because Forskal, the person to whose province the question belonged, is dead, and his journal is not yet printed. The oftener, how- ever, I consider the matter, I am the more impressed with the probability of this idea.being the true one, and here is the place to expatiate more fully upon it. Our walls and houses are often attacked with something that corrodes and consumes them, and which we commonly denominate Saltpetre. Its appearances are nearly as Moses describes them, only that we seldom find the spots greenish or red- dish, although I think I have met with them of the latter colour. As, however, I cannot exactly recollect where, I must appeal to the testimony of Mr. Professor Bekmann, who, on my asking him, informed me that he had seen an instance of reddish ones at Lnibeck. With us, this disease of walls is most frequently found in cellars, but it also as- cends into the higher parts of buildings, particularly in the case of a privy being directly under the wall, or where any other sort of filth can affect it. In my native city, Halle, it is extremely common, because the soil of all the country around is full of what is called saltpetre; which is scraped off from the turf walls of the cottages, by people who make it their business to collect it. Properly speaking, it is not saltpetre, but it contains the acid from which saltpetre is prepared. Wherever any part of these walls, that is preg- nant with this substance, is suffered to remain, it always effloresces anew ; and such parts the collectors take care to leave, when they repair the cottages with new earth, that after a few years they may find a fresh crop on the walls. But I have never seen it to such a degree as at Eisleben, in the church in which Luther was baptized. In the year 1757, I observed, on the left side of the choir of that church, a gravestone, I think of marble, and dated in the present century, in which the inscription, though deeply cut, was in many places, by reason of numberless dimples, scarcely legible, while I read with perfect ease other two inscriptions, four times as old. On my asking the sexton the reason of this, he said, the saltpetre had come into the stone, and told me a great deal more about it, which I did not sufficiently attend to, because I had no idea of its ever being useful to me in explaining the Bible, In Bern, Mr. Apothecary Andrea heard the people complain of a disease that in an especial manner attacked sandstone, so as to make it exfoliate, and become as it were cancerous. They call it the Gall, and, in like manner, ascribe it to the saltpetre contained in the stone. The Society of Natural- ists at Dantzig some time ago proposed a prize question on the Causes of the Destructive Corrosion of Walls by Saltpetre, and on the Means, not onhj of preventing it in New Buildings, but of curing it in Old. It was answered, among others, by Mr. Pastor Luther, who obtained the prize : but his essay, although, as the best, it might merit that distinction, has nevertheless given but little satisfaction to those who are versed in the subject, and particularly to Mr. Professor Bekmann, as we see from the third volume of his Physical and (Economical Library, p. 574. It is not, properly speaking, saltpetre that is in these walls and buildings, but an acid of nitre, from which, by the ad- dition of a fixed alkali, we can make saltpetre. But the disease is likewise owing sometimes to other acids, to the acid of sea-salt, for instance, as Professor Bekmann informs me ; and, from other experiments, Mr. Andrea has found the component parts of the efflorescence, to approach very near to those of Epsom salt, that is, vitriolic acid and mag- nesia. — See Bekmann's Biblioth. above quoted, vol. iv. p. 250. The detrimental effects of this efflorescence in walls, or, if I may use the common name, of this saltpetre, are the following : — 1. The walls become mouldy, and that to such a degree, as, in consequence of the corrosion spreading farther and farther, at least to occasion their tumbling down. Perhaps, however, this, at least in most parts of Germany, is the most tolerable evil attending the disease ; for it is certain, that many houses affected with it last to a great age ; only that the plaster of them requires very frequent repairing, because the lime with which they are coated, blisters, as it is called, that is, detaches itself from the wall, swells, and then falls off. I myself lived in a house at Halle, that was more than a hundred years old, and may probably stand a hundred years longer ; in which, nevertheless, the saltpe- tre had on one side, at a period beyond all remembrance, penetrated as far as the second story. The walls, hoM^ever, were from three to four feet thick, and really of excellent stone ; for which, indeed, Halle is remarkable. In other places, this evil may no doubt be more serious ; and I very much suspect, that such may have been the case in the damp parts of Egypt, where the Israelites dwelt. When I figure to myself those marshes, which the Greeks called Bucolia, at the mouth of the Nile, and the great quantity of saltpetre, or at any rate, of salt akin thereto, which Egypt produces, I cannot help thinking, that the saltpetre in build- ings, must have been much more destructive there than with us. Only our travellers very seldom go into the mar- shy districts, but rather to Alexandria, Cairo, and along the Nile as far as Assouan, where the soil is quite different ; and, of course, we can expect from them no information relative to the matter. Even the way along the coast, from Damietta to Alexandria, of which Abulfeda gives such a beautiful description, is, as far as I recollect, described by no other traveller. As my work has had the good fortune to find numerous readers in Holland, of whom, perhaps, some have it in their power to obtain more particular in- formation concerning those parts, I have to request, that they will take some pains for that purpose, and have the goodness to communicate to me whatever accounts they may procure, that are authentic, and illustrative of the subject, 2. Many things that lie near walls affected with saltpetre, thereby suffer damage, and are spoiled. I have myself seen great piles of books nearly ruined from this cause, and it is the same with other articles that cannot bear dampness, and acids. The loss here may often be greater and more considerable, than by the slow decay of the building itself; for it shows itself very perceptibly in the course of a few years, by rendering such articles often perfectly useless. 3. If the saltpetre be strong in those apartments wherein people live, it is pernicious to health, particularly where they sleep close to the wall. Of this, I had long ago a general notion, at Halle, from observing that such apart- ments were not usually inhabited ; but Professor Bekmann has just informed me of a remarkable case of a person, who, by occupying a room infected by saltpetre, was seized with {Salzflusse) saline defiuctions, which the physicians ascribed to the apartment alone. This unfortunate patient, who could not procure himself any better abode, he had often visited in company with a physician, whose attend- ance he had procured for him. Those people among us, who are in good circumstances, or not quite poor, may avoid the effects of the saltpetre corrosion, which seldom ascends higher than the lowest story, by living in the sec- ond floor, which is not so apt to be affected by it, and using the ground-floor for kitchen, waiting-parlour, &c. &c. But in a country where there was but little knowledge of archi- tecture, and where they were obliged to be satisfied, in general, with houses of W one story, the pernicious effects of the house-leprosy could not be thus averted. The consideration of these circumstances will render the Mosaic ordinances on this subject easily intelligible. Their object was to check the evil in the very bud ; to extiroate it while it was yet extirpable, by making every one, from the loss to which it would subject him, careful, to prevent his house from becoming affected with leprosy, which he could easily be, where the houses had no damp stone cellars below ground; and thus also, to place not only himself in perfect security, but his neighbours also, who might ver; reasonably dread having their houses contaminated b the infection. For this purpose, Moses proceeded in th following manner : — 1. In the first place, he ordained that the owner of a house, when any suspicious spots or dimples appeared oH the walls, should be bound to give notice of it, in ordejj that the house might be inspected by a person of skill ; anfli that person, as in the case of human leprosv, was to be the priest, whose duty it was to apply himself to (he study of such things. Now this would serve to check the mischi^^ in its very origin, and to make every one attentive to ol I Chap. 16. LEVITICUS. 77 serve it. If we had any such regulations in oar newly- ! founded cities, it is probable that the saltpetre would never • acquire suc'h a footing as it does. The cause of its estab- lishment anywhere would soon be discovered and remov- ed, instead of its being, as it now is, in our cities, suffered to increase to such a degree as to vitiate the whole atmo- sphere. 2. On notice being given, the priest was to inspect the house, but the occupant had liberty to remove every thing previously out of it ; and that this might be done, the priest was empowered to order it ex officio; for whatever was found within a house declared unclean, became unclean along with it. Thus much is clear, that the legislator did not suppose that the furniture of an infected house could contaminate any other place, else would he not have al- lowed its removal, while the matter was doubtful ; but here PI >bably he yielded to the fears of the people, (as every Jet,nslator should do in such cases, instead of saying. There can be no infection here, and ye must believe so ; for the dread of infection, whether well founded or not, is an evil against which we are fain to be secure ; and if a legislator neglects to make us so, we will either take forcible measures to ef- fect security, or else take fright, and shut ourselves up :) or perhaps he only meant to compel the possessor of a house, to a more honest intimation of the very first suspi- cious symptoms of the evil. For if he gave no such inti- mation, and his house, on being broke into, either at the re- quest of a neighbour, or any other informer, interested in making a discovery, happened to be found unclean, its whole contents became unclean of course. 3. If, on the first inspection, the complaint did not ap- pear wholly without foundation, but suspicious spots or dimples were actually to be seen, the house was to continue shut up for eight days, and then to be inspected anew. If, in this interval, the evil did not spread, it was considered as having been a circumstance merely accidental, and the house was not polluted ; but if it had spread, it was not ac- counted a harmless accident, b'ut the real house-leprosv ; and the stones affected with it, were to be broken out of the wall, and carried to an unclean place without the citv ; and the walls of the whole house were scraped and plaster- ed anew. These are the very same things that must be done at this day, if we want to clear a house of the saltpe- ire-evil. The stone or spot which produces it, must be ab- solutely removed : and the scraping, and fresh plastering, is also necessary ; for it is in the very lime that the saltpe- tre, (or, to speak more properly, the acid of nitre,) estab- lishes itself most firmly. In our large buildings, indeed, it is not just necessary to new-plaster the whole house ; but the houses of the Hebrews were very small ; and even the temple of Solomon itself, built some centuries posterior to the time of Moses, notwithstanding all the fame of its mag- nificence, was by no means nearly so large as many a house in Gottingen ; although certainly we cannot boast of palaces, and have only good bourgeois houses. 4. If, after this, the leprosy broke out afresh, the whole house was to be pulled down, and the materials carried to an unclean place without the city. Moses, therefore, it would appear, never suffered a leprous house to stand. The injury which such houses might do to the health of the inhabitants, or to the articles they contained, was of more consequence in his estimation, than the buildings them- selves. Those to whom this appears strange, and who la- ment the fate of a house pulled down by legal authority, probably think of large and magnificent houses like ours, of many stories high, which cost a great deal of money, and in the second story of which, the people are generally se- cure from all danger of the saltpetre ; but I have already mentioned, that the houses of those days were low, and of very little value. 5. If, on the other hand, the house, being inspected a second time, was found clean, it was solemnly so declared, and an offering made on the occasion ; in order that every one might know for certain, that it was not infected, and the public be freed from all fears on that score. By this law many evils were actually prevented, — the spreading of the saltpetre-infection, and even its beginning ; for the people would guard against those impurities whence it arose, from its being so strictly inquired into ; — the dan- ger of their allowing their property or their health to suf- fer in an infected house, from mere carelessness ; — the dif- ficulty of making (among the Hebrews it would have been, their slaves, but among us it would be) our hired servants, or perhaps our children's preceptor, occupy an infected apartment that was for no other use, and sleep close to an unwholesome wall. With such a law, no man can have any just ground of dissatisfaction ; and we might at all events ask, why we have it not put in force in newly-built cities'? It is certainly very singular, that in this country, or, at any rate, in some places of it, we have a law, which is a most complete counterpart to it. No doubt our house- leprosy is not attended with the same evils as it was among the Hebrews, by reason of the change of circumstances, and because tne saltpetre, being necessary for the manu- facture of gunpowder, is otlen scraped off; and herein we have a strong example of the diversity occasioned in legis- lative policy, by difference of time and climate. We hav^e occasion for great quantities of saltpetre, in consequence of the invention of gunpowder ; and, as in some parts of Ger- many where the soil abounds with it, such as the circle of the Saal, in the dutchy of Magdeburg, the cottages of the peas- ants have, from time immemorial, had their walls built only of earth, in which, by reason of tbat want of cleanli- ness, in many respects, which prevails in country villages, the saltpetre establishes itself, and effloresces ; there is an ancient consuetudinary law, that the collectors of this sub- stance may scrape it off; which they can do without any damage whatever to the houses ; only they take care never to scrape it off to the very roots, nor dare the occupants of the l^ouses extirpate it altogether. The walls are so thick, and so often cleaned by this operation, that, for my part at least, I never heard that the health of the people was affect- ed by the saltpetre ; and in the houses themselves, though inhabited by very substantial tenants, there is not much to spoil. — At the same time, I should be glad to be more fully informed by any physician of that country, whether he had ever traced any pernicious effects to the cause in question 1 — MiCHAELIS. CHAPTER XVI. Ver. 10. But the goat on which the lot fell to be the scape-goat, shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scape-goat. When a person is sick he vows on his recovery to set a goat at liberty, in honour of his deity. Having selected a suitable one from his flocks, he makes a slit in the ear, or ties a yellow string round its neck, and lets it go whitherso- ever it pleases. Whoever sees the animal knows it to be a Nate-kadi, the vowed goat, and no person will molest it. Sometimes two goats are thus made sacred ; but one of them will be offered soon, and the other kept for a future sacrifice. But it is not merely in time of sickness that they have recourse to this practice : for does a man wish to procure a situation, he makes a similar vow. Has a per- son heard that there are treasures concealed in any place, he vows to Virava (should he find the prize) to set a goat at liberty, in honour of his name. When a person has committed what he considers a great sin, he does the same thing ; but in acidition to other ceremonies, he sprinkles the animal with water, puts his hands upon it, and prays to be forgiven. — Roberts. The Aswamedha Jug is an ancient Indian custom, in which a horse was brought and sacrificed, with some rites similar to those prescribed in the Mosaic law. " The horse so sacrificed is in place of the sacrificer, bears his sins with him into the wilderness, into which he is turned adrifl, (for, from this particular instance, it seems that the sacrificing knife was not always employed,) and becomes the expiatory victim of those sins." Mr. Halhed observes, that this ceremony reminds us of the scape-goat of the Israelites ; and indeed it is not the only one in which a particular coincidence between the Hindoo and Mosaic systems of theology may be traced. To this account may be subjoined a narrative in some measure similar from Mr. Bruce. " We found, that upon some dissension, the garrison and townsm-en had been fighting for several days, in which disorders the greatest part of the ammunition in the town had been expended, but it had since been agreed on by the old men of both parties, that nobody had been to blame on either side, but the whole wrong was the woik of a camel. A camel, therefore, was seized, and brought without the town, and there a number on both sides ha\ »ng 78 LEVITICUS. Chap. 17, 18 met, they upbraided the camel with every thing that had been either said or done. The fM,mel had killed men ; he had threatened to set the town on fire ; the camel had threatened to burn the aga's house and the castle ; he had cursed the grand seignior and the sheriff of Mecca, the sovereigns of the two parties ; and, the only thing the poor animal was interested in, he had threatened to destroy the wheat that was going to Mecca. After having spent great part of the afternoon in upbraiding the camel, whose mea- sure of iniquity, it seems, was near full, each man thrust him through with a lance, devoting him Mis maif^ibus et diris, by a kind of prayer, and with a thousand curses upon his head, after which every man retired, fully satisfied as to the wrongs he had received from the camel .'" — Burder. CHAPTER XVII. Ver. 7. And they shall no more offer their sacri- fices unto devils, after whom they have gone a-whoring-. This shall be a statute for ever unto them throughout their generations. The Hebrew word Seirim, here translated devils, (field devils,) properly signifies woolly, hairy, in general ; whence it is used as well for he-goats, as also for certain fabulous beings or sylvan gods, to whom, as to the satyrs, the popu- lar belief ascribed the form of goats. But, in the above passage, he-goats are probably meant, which were ob- jects of divine honour among the Egyptians, under 'the name of Mendes, as emblems of the fructifying power of nature, or of the frtictifying power of the sun. From this divinity, which the Greeks compared with their Pan, a province in Egypt had its name. Goats and he-goats, says Herodotus, are not slaughtered by the Egyptians whom we have mentioned, because they consider Pan as one of the oldest gods. But painters as well as statuaries represent this deity with the face and the legs of a goat, as the Greeks used to represent Pan. The Mandeseans pay divine honour to he-goats and she-goats ; but more to the former than to the latter. — Rosenmuller. CHAPTER XVIII. Ver. 6. None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, (Heb. remnant of flesh,) to uncover their nakedness. In his statutes relative to marriage, and sometimes, also, in other parts of his law, Moses expresses near relationship, either by the single word, -iNtr, (Sheer) pars, scil. carnis, or more fully by the two words, -^v:: -iNtt?, Sheer-basar, pars carnis, {part or remainder of flesh.) The meaning of these terms has been the subject of much controversy. Some would translate ihexo. flesh of flesh; others, remn/int of flesh. But those that say most of their etymology, are in general not so much oriental philologists, as divines and lawyers ; and yet we should rather like to have an illustration of any obscure etymological question, from those who unite with the knowledge of Hebrew, an acquaintance with its kin- dred eastern languages. There are some also, who would make this distinction between Sheer, and Sheer-basar, that the former means only persons immediately connected loith us, such as children, parents, grandchildren, grandparents, and husbands or wives ; and the latter, those who are related to us only mediately, but in the nearest degree, such as, our brothers and sisters, who are, properly speaking, our father'' s flesh. Others again think, that Sheer-basar means nothing but children and grandchildren. These conjectures, how- ever, are by no means consonant to the real usage of the language, in the Mosaic laws themselves ; for in Levit. XXV. 48, 49, Slieer-basar follows as the name of a more remote relation, after brother, paternal uncle, or paternal uncle's son; and in Num. xxvii. 8 — 11, it is commanded, that " if a man die without sons, his inheritance shall be given to his daughters ; if he have no daughters, it shall pass to his brothers, of whom, if he has none, then to his paternal uncles ; and if these are also wanting, it shall then be given unto his nearest Sheer in his family.''^ It is manifest that, in this passage. Sheer includes those relations that follow in succession to a father's brother. If the reader wishes to know what these words etymologically signify, I shall here just state to him my opinion, but with- out repeating tjie grounds on which it rests. Sheer means, 1. a, remtiant; 2. the remnant of a meal; 3. a piece of a/riy thing eatable, such as flesh ; 4. a piece of any thing in gen- eral. Hence we find it subsequently transferred to rela- tionship in the Arabic language ; in which, though with a slight orthographical variation, that nearest relation is call-ed Tair or Thsair, whom the Hebrews denominate Goel. In this way. Sheer, even by itself, would signify i relation. — Basar, commonly rendered flesh, is among th«. Hebrews equivalent to body ; and may thence have been applied to signify relationship. Thus, thou art my flesh, or body, (Gen. xxix. 14,) means, thou art my near kinsman. When both words are put together, Sheer-basar, they may be rendered literally, corporeal relation, or by a half Hu. brew phrase, kinsman after the flesh. In their derivation, there are no further mysteries concealed, nor any thing that can bring the point in question to a decision ; and what marriages Moses has permitted or commanded, we cannot ascertain from Sheer-basar, frequent and extensive as is its use in his marriage-laws : but must determine, from his own ordinances, in which he distinctly mentions what Sheer-basar, that is, what relations, are forbidden to marry. — Michaelis. Ver. 16. Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife : it is thy brother's naked- ness. 1 8. Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, be- sides the other in her life-time. With regard to the marriages mentioned in this chapter, there arises the question, whether Moses only prohibits the marriages which he expressly mentions, or others besides, not mentioned, where the degree of relationship is the same 1 This question, which is of so great importance in the mar- riage laws of Christian nations, and which, from our im- perfect knowledge of oriental customs, has been the sub- ject of so much controversy*properly regards the following marriages never mentioned by Moses, viz. 1. With a brother's daughter. 2. A\ ith a sister's daughter. 3. With a maternal uncle's widow. 4. With a brother's son's widow. 5. With a sister's son's widow. 6. With a deceased wife's sister. These marriages we may, perhaps, for brevity's sake, be allowed to denominate the six marriages, or the consequen- tial marriages. They are as near as those mentioned in the foregoing article, and prohibited. Moses never men- tions them in his marriage statutes ; yet the ground of his prohibitions is nearness of relationship. The question, therefore, is, Are these marriages to be, or not to be, con- sidered as prohibited, by just inference from the letter of his laws 'i In my opinion, they an not; and in proving this, I will most willingly concede to those of a contrary opinion, a multitude of objections against their consequences, as de- duced from the letter of the Mosaic statutes ; such, for in- stance, as this, that according to the pri7iciple of judicial her^ieneutics, prohibitions are not to be extended beyond thf letter of the lau) ; for I readily acknowledge that this rule, how valid soever in our law, is nevertheless not universal and not always safely applicable to veiy ancient laws, if we wish to ascertain the true meaning and opinion of the law- giver : Or this, again, that in these marriages there is no violation of Respectus parentela ; for I have already admit- ted that that principle, to which the Roman lawyers appeal, was not the foundation of the Mosaic prohibitions. I will go yet one step further in courtesy, and promise to appeal on no occasion whatever to the common opinion of the Jews, or to those examples of ancient Jewish usage, whereby the marriages here mentioned are permitted ; for all the Jewish expositors, and all the examples they can produce, are much too modern for me to found upon, where the question is concerning the true meaning of a law given some hun- dred, or rather thousand years before them. So much generosity on my part, many readers would, perhaps, not have anticipated ; but I owe nothing less to impartialitjj, and the love of truth. My reasons, then, for denying, arid protesting against the conclusions in question, ar^ iz iol-' lowing : — 1. Moses does not appear to have framed or given hi? I marriage laws with any view to our deducing, or acting Chap. 19, 20 LEVITICUS. 79 upon, conclusions which we might think fit to deduce from them : for if this was his view, he has made several repetitions in theui, that are really very useless. What reason had he, for example, after forbidding marriage with a father's sis- ter, to forbid it also with a mother's, if this second prohibi- tion was included in the first, and if he meant, without say- ing a word on the subject, to be understood as speaking, not of particular marriages, but of degrees ^ 3. Moses has giv^en his marriage laws in two different places of the Pentateuch, viz. in both the xviii. and xx. chapters of Leviticus ; but in the latter of these passages we find only the very same cases specitied, which had been specified in the former. Now, had they been meant mere- ly as examples of degrees of relationship, it would have been more rational to have varied them; and if it had been said, for instance, on the first occasion, Thou shall nol mar- rtj Ihyfalher^s sisler, to have introduced, on the second, the converse case, and said. Thou s/utll nol marry thy brother's daughter. This, however, is not done by Moses, who, in the second enactment, just specifies thefather^s sister^ as be- fore ; and seems, therefore, to have intended that he should be understood as having in his view no other marriages than those which he expressly names; unless we choose to interpret his laws in a manner foreign to his own meaning and d-esign. 3. If, in opposition to this, the advocates of the contrary opinion urge, that the six consequential marriages are just as near as those expressly prohibited ; my answer is, that though here they may seem to be in the right, there is yet, according to the customs of the Hebrews, so great a dis- tinction between these two classes of marriages, that any conclusion drawn from the one to the other, is entirely nu- gatory. For, (1.) In the Jirst place, among the oriental nations, the niece was regarded as a more distant relation than the aunt. The latter, whether fathers' or mothers' sister, her nephew might see unveiled, in other words, had much nearer access to her ; whereas the former, whether bro- thers' or sisters' daughter, could not be seen by her uncle without a veil. Now, this distinction refers to the very essence of 'le prohibitions ; for it is not the natural degree of relationship, but the right of familiar intercourse, that constitutes the danger of corruption. If, therefore, these laws were given for the purpose of preventing early de- bauchery under the hope of marriage, with an aunt, and with a niece, they are by no means on the same footing ; for to the former, by" the law of relationship, an Israelite had a degree of access, which in the case of the latter was not per- mitted. Both stood in the same degree of affinity accord- ing to the genealogical tree, but not so by the intimacy of intercourse permitted with them. (2.) In the second place, there was a difference equally great, or even greater, made between the paternal uncle's widow on the one hand, and the widow of the maternal uncle, or of the brother's or sister's son, on the other. For if by that ancient law, of which the Levirate-marriage may be a relic, the widow was regarded as part of the in- heritance, — I, in the event of my father being dead, receiv- ed his brother's widow by inheritance, but not my mother's brother's, because he belonged to a different family ; nor yet could I thus receive the widow of my brother or sister's son, because inlieritances do not usually ascend ; or, at any rate, an inheritance of this kind ; to make use of which, a man must necessarily not be old, ifthe person who has left it was young. In the case, therefore, of the prohibited marriages specified by Moses, there was by the ancient law an expec- tancy, and by the Levirate-law it become a duty, to marry the widow of a paternal uncle, who had died childless, and to raise up seed to him; but in the case of the marriages not prohibited by Moses, there could be no room for either. If, by reason of this distinction, there be, in regard to the brother's son's widow, as belonging to one familv, the least doubt remaining in the mind of the reader, I hope to re- move it likewise, into the bargain. V/ere I to receive her by inheritance, it must be presupposed that she would have first fallen naturally to my father, and only in consequence of his being no longer alive, have devolved upon me, one degree more distant. But any inheritance so abominable as that of a son's widow devolving to his father, we can scarcely figure to ourselves ; although Thamar, from re- sentment and despair, conceived the idea of her having suck a claim, and contrived by secret artifice to enforce it, Gen. xxxviii. Rather would she fall to her husband's bro- ther, and were he not alive, naturally devolve to his son. It is therefore manifest, that the father's brother could never have had that expectancy of his brother's son's widow, which might be attended with such pernicious consequen- ces as I have already remarked. 4. The strongest and most decisive argument against the conseqiiential system^ and the reckoning by degrees, is drawn from the case of marriage with a deceased wife's sister; The relationship- here is as near as that of a brother's widow ; and yet Moses prohibits the marriage of a bro- ther's widow, and permits that of a deceased wife's sister, or rather (which makes the proof still stronger,) he presup- poses it in his laws as permitted ; and consequent] v^ wished to be understood as forbidding only those marriages which he expressly specifies, and not others of the like proximity, thougn unnoticed. The reader who is not satisfied v. iih these remarks, may consult the 7th chapter of my Treatise on the Marriage Laws, where he will find many particu- lars more fully detailed. But here I cannot say move, without dwelling too long on one part of my subject. — Mi- CHAELIS. CHAPTER XIX. Ver. 9. And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the glean- ings of thy harvest. The right of the poor in Israel to glean after the reapers, was thus secured oy a positive law. It is the opinion of some writers, that although the poor were allowed the lib- erty of gleaning, the Israelitish proprietors were not oblig- ed to admit them immediately into the field, as soon as the reapers had cut down the corn, and bound it up in sheaves, but when it was carried off; they might choose also among the poor, whom they thought most deserving or most ne- cessitous. These opinions receive some countenance, from the request which Ruth presented to the servant of Boaz, to permit her to glean " among the sheaves ;" and from the charge of Boaz to his young men, " let her glean even among the sheaves ;" a mode of speaking which seems to insinuate, that though they could not legally hinder Paith from gleaning in the field., they had a right", if they chose to exercise it, to prohibit her from gleaning r.mong the sheaves, or immediately after the reapers. — Paxton. Ver. 28. Ye shall not rnake any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upoji you : I am the Lord. The heathen print marks on their bodies, (by puncturing the skin,) so as to represent birds, trees, and the gods they serve. Some also, especially the sacred females of the tem- ples, have representations on their arms of a highly offen- sive nature. All Hindoos have a black spot, or some other mark, on their foreheads. And the true followers of Siva rub holy ashes every morning on the knees, loins, navel, arms, shoulders, brow, and crown of the head. — Roberts. Ver. 29. Do not prostitute thy daughter, to cause her to be a whore ; lest the land fall to whore- dom, and the land become full of -wickedness. Parents, in consequence of a vow or some other circum- stance, often dedicate their daughters to the gods. They are sent to the temple, at the age of eight or ten years, to be initiated into the art of dancing before the deities, and of singing songs in honour of their exploits. From that pe- riod these dancing girls remain in some sacred building neai the temple ; and when they arrive at maturity, (the parents being made acquainted with the fact,) a feast is made, and the poor girl is given into the embraces of some influential man of the establishment. Practices of the most disgusting nature then take place, and the young victim becomes a prostitute for life. — Roberts. CHAPTER XX. Ver. 2. Ao-ain thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he he of the children of Is- 8C LEVITICUS. Chap. 20. rael, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech, he shall surely be put to death : the people of the land shall stone him with stones. One of the most common punishments in use among the Jews, was stoning, which appears to have been a most grievous and terrible infliction: "when the criminal ar- rived within four cubits of the place of execution, he was stripped naked, only leaving a covering before ; and his hands being bound, he was led up to the fatal spot, which was an emmence about twice the height of a man. The first executioners of the sentence, were the witnesses, who generally pulled off their clothes for that purpose : one of them threw him down with great violence upon his loins ; if he rolled upon his breast, he was turned upon his loins again : and if he died by the fall, the sentence of the law was executed ; but if not, the other witness took a great stone and dashed it on his breast as he lay upon his back ; and then, if he was not despatched, all the people that stood by, threw stones at him till he died."— Lewis. Ver. 25. Ye shall therefore put difference between clean beasts and unclean, and between unclean fowls and clean : and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean. The Mosaic ordinances respecting clean and unclean beasts, other authors refer to the head of Ecclesiastical Laws; but as they relate, not to any ceremonies of religious worship, but merely to matters of a secular nature, I choose rather to treat of them under the head of Police Law, as one would naturally do in the case of any other laws, that prohibited the use of certain meats. And first of all, I must illustrate the terms clean and unclean, as applied to beasts ; because we are apt to consider them as implying a division of animals with which we are entirely unacquaint- ed, and then to wonder that Moses, as an historian, in describing the circumstances of the deluge, w^hich took place many centuries before the era of his own laws, should mention clean and unclean beasts, and, by so doing, presuppose that there was such a distinction made at that early period. The fact however is, that we ourselves, and indeed almost all nations, make this very distinction, although we do not express it in these terms. Clean and unclean beasts is precisely tantamount to beasts usual and not usual for food. And how many animals are there not poisonous, but perfectly edible, which yet we do not eat, and at the flesh of which, many among us would feel a strong abhorrence, just because we have not been accus- tomed to it from infancy 1 What Moses did in regard to this matter, was, in the main, nothing more than converting ancient national cus- tom into positive law. The very same animals had, for the most part, previously been to the Israelites or their ancestors, clean or unclean, that is, usual or unusual for food ; and we find that even in Joseph's time, the Eg)'p- tians, who had different customs with regard to meats, and observed them, very rigidly, could not so much as eat at the same table with the Israelitish patriarchs. Gen. xliii. 32. These ancestorial usages Moses now prescribed as express laws; excluding, perhaps, some animals formerly made use of for food, and reducing the whole into what, upon the principles of physiology, was actually a very easy and nat- ural system ; concerning which, as I shall have to speak in the sequel, I only observe at present, that its limits were, perhaps, before trespassed, both on the side of prohibition and permission. As soon as we know what is the real meaning of clean and unclean beasts, many errors, some of them ludicrous, and from which, even men of great learn- ing have not been wholly exempt, instantly vanish. The word unclean, applied to animals, is no epithet of degrada- tion : of all animals, man was the most unclean, that is, human flesh was least of all things to be eaten ; and such is the case, in every nation not reckoned among cannibals. The lion and the horse are unclean beasts, but were to the Hebrews just as little the objects of contempt as they are to us. It is another mistake to imagine that the Jews durst not have any unclean animals in their houses, nor have any thing to do with them ; and hence has arisen our strange German proverb, Like a sow in a Jew^s house. But let us only recollect the instances of the ass and camel, the common beasts of burden among the Hebrews, in addition to which, in later times, we have the horse. All the three species w^ere unclean. Even the keeping of swine, as arti- cles of trade, was as little forbidden to the Jews as dealing in horses, which they carried on very commonly. The main design of Moses, in converting the ancient national customs of the Hebrews into immutable laws, might, no doubt, be, to keep them more perfectly separate from other nations. They were to continue a distinct people by themselves, to dwell altogether in Palestine, without spreading into other countries, or having too much intercourse with their inhabitants ; in order to prevent their being infected, either with that idolatry, which was then the sensus communis of all mankind, or with the vices of the neighbouring nations, among whom the Canaanites were particularly specified. The first of these objects, the pre- vention of idolatry, and the maintenance of the worship of one only God, was the fundamental maxim of the Mosaic legislation, and t^e second, namely, the preservation of his people from the contagion of various vices, previously un- common among them, such as bestiality, sodomy, incest, incestuous marriages, which are always destructive to the happiness of a country, divinations, human sacrifices, &c. &c. ; together with the maintaining among them their present morals, if but tolerably good, must be an object of great importance with every legislator, if a profligate race, such as Moses and the RouMn writers describe the Canaanites to have been, happen to live in their vicinity. And this Moses himself seems to point out as his object, in the xxth chapter of Leviticus, ver. 25, 26, and that too after warning the Israelites against imitating the Canaanites in the vices now mentioned: "Ye shall," says he, "distin- guish beasts clean and unclean, and birds clean and un- clean, from each other, and not defile yourselves by four-footed, flying, or creeping creatures, which I have separated as unclean ; ye shall be holy to me, for I Jeho- vah am holy, and have separated you from other peoples, to be mine own." The distinction of clean and unclean meats may be a very effectual means of separating one nation from another. Intimate friendships are, in most cases, formed at table ; and with the man, with whom I can neither eat or drink, let our intercourse in business be what it may, I shall sel- dom become so familiar, as with him whose guest I am, and he mine. If we have, besides, from education, an abhorrence of the food which others eat, this forms a new obstacle to closer intimacy. Now, all the neighbours of the Israelites did make use of meats, which were forbidden to them from their infancy. The Eg}^ptians differed most from them in this respect : for they had from immemorial ages, a still more rigorous system of national laws on this point, which restrained them even more strongly from intercourse with foreigners. Some of the animals which the Israelites ate, were among them not indeed unclear, but yet sacred, being so expressly consecrated to a deity, that they durst not be slaughtered ; because, according to the Egyptian doctrine of the transmigration of souls, a man could not but be afraid of devouring his OAvn forefathers, if he tasted the flesh of those beasts, in which the souls of the best of men usually resided. Even before the ancestors of the Israelites descended into Egj'pt, this had proceeded so far, that the Egyptians not only could not eat the same sort of food, but could not even so much as sit at the same table with Hebrews, Gen. xliii. 32 ; and these wandering herdsmen, who ate the flesh of goats, sheep, and oxen, which were all forbidden in one or other of the provinces of| Egypt, were so obnoxious to them, that they would noM allow them to live among them, but assigned "them a sepa-1 rate part of the country for a residence. Gen. xlvi. 33, 34. An Egyptian durst not so much as use a vessel, in which a foreigner ate his impure victuals ; still less durst he kiss a foreigner: although I will not venture to assert, that this last command was, in all cases, inviolably observed, where a tawny Egyptian found a fair Grecian alone, how impure soever her food rendered her. — We may therefore conjec- ture, that Moses here borrowed somewhat from the legis- lative policy of the Egyptians, and with a view to a mort Chap. 21—24. LEVITICUS. 51 complete and permanent separation of the two peoples, made that a law among the Israelites, which before was nothing else than a custom of their fathers. Besides this main object, there might,. no doiibt, in the case of certain animals, interfere dietetical considerations to influence Moses ; only we are not to seek for them in all the prohibitions relative to unclean beasts. In regard to that respecting swine's flesh, they are pretty obvious ; and every prudent legislator must endeavour either to divert by fair means a people in the circumstances and climate of the Israelites, from the use of that food, or else express- ly interdict it. For whoever is affected with any cutane- ous disease, were it but the common itch, if he wishes to be cured, must abstain from swine's flesh. It has likewise been long ago observed, that the use of this food produces a peculiar susceptibility of itchy disorders. Now, throughout the whole climate under which Palestine is situated, and for a certain extent both south and north, the leprosy is an endemic disease ; and with this disease, which is pre-emi- nently an Egyptian one, the Israelites left Egypt so terribly overrun, that Moses found it necessary to enact a variety of laws respecting it ; and that the contagion might l>e weakened, and the people tolerably guarded against its in- fluence, it became requisite to prohibit them from eating swine's flesh altogether. This prohibition, however, is suf- ficiently distinguished, from all others of the kind, in these two respects ; in the first place, the Arabs, who eat other sorts of food forbidden the Jews, yet hold swine's flesh to be imclean ; and, in conformity with their ideas, Mohammed forbade the use of it in the Koran : in the second place, every physician will interdict a person labouring under any cutaneous disease, from eating pork ; and it has been remarked of our Germany — a country otherwise in gener- al pretty clear of them, — that such diseases are in a pecu- liar manner to be met with in those places where a great deal of pork is eaten. Some have been inclined to discover moral reasons for the laws in question, and to ascribe to the eating of certain animals a specific influence on the moral temperament. Thus the camel is extremely revengeful ; and it has been pretended, that it is their eating camels' flesh so frequently, that makes the Arabs so prone to revenge. But of this there is too little proof Other nations in the south of Eu- rope, charged with the same national passion, and who either, as in the case with the Italians, have a pleasure in < revenge, even in secret revenge, or, like the Portuguese, are, by a strange point of honour, necessitated to the ex- ercise of implacable revenge, neither eat the flesh nor drink the milk of camels. Perhaps the vindictive propen- sity of the Arabs is rather an effect of climate, or of tneir point of honour in regard to blood-avengement, than of eating camels' flesh. At the same time, I do not entirely I deny the influence of food on the moral temperament ; but t I am by no means yet convinced, that the daily use of cer- tain kinds of animal food will ever so far alter it, as to give a legislator reason to prohibit them ; nor yet can I believe, that eating the flesh of any animal directly in- spires us with the passions of that animal, although it may operate upon us in other respects. — Michaelis. CHAPTER XXI. Ver. 18. For whatsoever man he he that hath a blemish, he shall not approach ; a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any- thing superfluous. Among the heathen, persons of the most respectable appearance were appointed to the priesthood ; and the emperor, both among the Greeks and Romans, was both king and priest. Considering the object of r^igious wor- I ship, it is not possible tliat too much circumspection can be maintained in every part of it. If great men deem it re- proachful to have things imperfect presented to them, it may most reasonably be supposed that such offerings would be rejected with anger by God. The general opinion was, that a priest who was defective in any member was to be avoided as ominous. At Elis, in Greece,, the judges chose the finest looking man to carry the sacred vessels of the deity : he that was next him in beauty and elegance led I the ox ; and the third m personal beauty carried the gar- I Unds, ribands, wine, and the other things used in sacrifice. i 11 Among most nations of antiquity, persons who had bodily defects were excluded from the priesthood. Among the Greeks " it was required, that whoever was admitted to this oflfice should be sound and perfect in all his members, it being thought a dishonour to the gods to be served by any one that was lame, maimed, or any other way imperfect ; and therefore at Athens, before their consecration, they were w^cAtij, i. e. perfect and entire, jieither having any de- fect, nor any thing superfluous." Potter. Seneca says, " that Metelius, who had the misfortune to become blind, when he saved the Palladium from the flames, on the burn- ing of the temple of Vesta, was obliged to lay down the priesthood :" and he adds, " Every priest whose body is not faultless, is to be avoided like a thing of bad omen." Sacerdos non integri corporis quasi mali ominis est vitandus est. M. Sergius, who lost his right hand in defence of his country, could not remain a priest for that reason. The bodily defects which disqualified a virgin from becoming a vestal are named by A. Gellius, Noct. Alt. i. chap. 12. ROSENMULLER. Even those of the seed of Aaron who had any personal defect, were not allowed to take a part in the offerings of the Lord. The priesthood among the Hindoos is hereditary, but a deformed person cannot perform a cere- mony in the temple ; he may, however, prepare the flowers, fruits, oils, and cakes, for the offerings, and also sprinkle the premises with holy water. The child of a priest being deformed at the birth will not be consecrated. A priest having lost an eye or a tooth, or being deficient in any member or organ, or who has not a wife, cannot per- form the ceremony called Teevasam, for the manes of de- parted friends. Neither will his incantations, or prayers, or magical ceremonies, have any effect. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXIII. Ver. 22. And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not make clean riddance of the corners of thy field when thou reapest, nei- ther shalt thou gather any gleaning of thy har- vest : thou shalt leave them unto the poor, and to the stranger: I am the Lord your God. Fields in the East, instead of hedges, have ridges. In the corners they cannot easily work with the plough, and there- fore prepare that part with a man-vetty, i. e. an earth-cutter, or large kind of hoe. The corn in these corners is seldom yery productive, as the ridge for some time conceals it from the sun and other sources of nourishment, and the rice also, in the vicinity, soon springing up, injures it by the shade. Under these circumstances, the people think but little of the corners, and were a person to be very particular, he would have the name of a stingy fellow. From this view, it appears probable, that the command was given, in order to induce the owner to leave the little which was produced in the corners for the poor. No farmer will allow any of his family to glean in the fields, the pittance left is always considered the property of-the poor. In car- rying the sheaves, all that falls is taken up by the gleaners. Roberts. CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 16. And he that blasphemeth the name ot the Lord, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him ; as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD, shall be put to death. Among most nations blasphemy is regarded as one ot the greatest crimes, and punished capitally. Whether in this they act rationally, and what force there is in the ob- jection, that blasphemy does not hurt God, I shall not here stop to inquire ; as, perhaps, some notice of these points will be taken in my proposed essay on the Intention ot Punishments; and, therefore, I proceed to observe, that in the Mosaic polity, whereby God became both King ana Lawgiver of the Israelites, and where, of course, blasphe- my was a crime against the state, we find it, in like man- ner, considered as a capital crime, and the punif^iment ot stoning annexed to it ; Lev. xxiv. 10 — 14. Nor was th« 82 LEVITICUS. Chap, 24. circumstance of the blasphemer being a foreigner, to make any difference in the punishment. Indeed, this was actually the case, on the occasion of the punishment of this crime being first settled. A man, whose father was an Egyptian, but his mother a woman of Israel, had, in a quarrel with an Israelite, blasphemed Jehovah, He was, after an inquiry into the mind of God, adjudged to be stoned ; and the edict published on this occasion, concludes with these words, " One uniform law shall you all have, foreigners as well as natives ; for I am Jehovah your God." Allowing that a foreigner does not believe in our God, although, indeed, with regard to the God of Israel this was not likely to hap- pen, because paganism was syncretistic, and did not deny the divinity of other gods ; and, besides, the Israelites be- lieved in the God who created the world, and whom we know, and acknowledge from reason, without revelation ; but allowing, I say, a foreigner to be an infidel, still he has no right to insult the people, under whose protection he lives, by blaspheming the object of their veneration, and whose name they hold supremely sacred. It is with hesitation, and not without danger, that I venture to adopt a Jewish explanation, which has been commonly ridiculed as a piece of mere superstition, in regard to this law, in Lev. xxiv. 16, which declares, that whoever shall utter the name Jehovah shall die ; the whole congregation shall stone him: foreigner as well as native shall die, if he utter the name Jehovah, Instead of utter, we may translate curse, for the Hebrew word Nakab (3p)) signifies both, and then we shall have the blasphemer spoken of a second time ; but to this translation there seems to be this objection, that the 16th verse would thus be no- thing but a needless repetition of the preceding one. Thus much is certain, that at a very ancient period, long be- fore the birth of Christ, the Jews understood the law be- fore us, as if it prohibited them from uttering the name Jehovah, which the true God had given himself as his nomen proprium, on any other than solemnly-sacred, or at any rate sacred, occasions ; and, of course, from ever naming him at all in common life. The Greek version ascribed to the persons called the Seventy Interpreters, and which was made at least 250 years before Christ, here ren- ders, " Whoever nameththe name of the Lord shall die;" and we see that, by this time, the Jews were accustomed, wherever they found the word Jehovah in the Bible, to pro- nounce, instead of it, the name Adonai, (>3in) or Lord : for, in place of Jehovah, (nin'') the Seventy always put, b Kvpiog. Philo, who lived in the time of Christ, explains the passage, connecting it with the preceding verse, in the following terms, " Strange gods are not to be blasphemed, lest men should be accustomed to think meanly of the Deity. But if any one, (I do not say blaspheme, for that is not here in question, but) even so much as utter unseasonably the name of the Lord of men and gods, he shall die." We may, therefore, approve of this explanation, or not, as we please ; but we must not look upon it as a piece of superstition originating with the Jews, who lived after the destruction of Jerusalem, and whose opinions, in regard to the Mosaic law, I do not, for the most part, so much as notice. This prohibition of uttering the name of God, whether it please us or not, does not, by any means, appear altogether im- probable ; for it is in conformity with the customs and legislative policy of the Egyptians, who had secret names for their gods, which it was lawful for the priests alone to f)ronounce ; no man being permitted to do so in common ife. And, in like manner, Rhadamanthus, who herein wished to imitate the Egyptians, would not, on occasions of taking oaths, allow the names of the gods to be mention- ed, but only those of the animals consecrated to them, such as dogs, rams, geese, &c. Nor would I be disposed to maintain, that no advantage could flow from such a prohibition. For in the first place, that name of the Deity, which was considered as his proper name, would be, at any rate, thereby guarded from profa- nations and misapplications, which sometimes leave behind them ludicrous and contemptuous impressions, that can never be effaced ; and, in an age when polytheism was so prevalent, this was a matter of much more importance than at present ; for then God was not, as with us in Germany, equivalent to a nom,en proprium, but every god, whether true or false, had his own peculiar name ; and hence we "find Mo'ies addressing the God who appeared to him, and who declared himseH" the " God of his fathers," and, of course, the creator of heaven and earth, and the only true God ; and asking him what answer he should return to the Israelites, if they wished to know what Was his name, Exod. iii. 13, In the second place, a name of the deity, which is never mentioned in common life, will have something extremely solemn in it, particularly where it is so significant, as was the word Jehovah. It will, of course, in worship, in prayer, and in the case of an oath, make so much the deeper im- pression ; and thut, with respect to the last of these, may serve to prevent perjury, or, at least, to make it but rare : for whatever is unknown and uncommon, affects the human heart with terror and with awe. In fact, I myself believed that this law ought to be understood in this way, when I was translating the book of Leviticus, about three years ago ; but since that time, the consideration of the great severity of the punishmept has raised a doubt in my mind on this point. Moses prohibits naming the name Jehovah ; but was that to be a capital crime 1 If so, where was there any gradation of punishments ; stoning being- thus the punishment of the blasphemer of God, and of the man also who but uttered his name 1 — But this doubt becomes still weightier, when we read both verses, namely, verses 15 and 16 of Lev. xxiv. together. And here I must acknow- ledge a mistake in my translation : for the words in ver. 15, " he shall bear his sin," I rendered periphrastically, " he shall atone for his crime," because I adhered to the com mon opinion, that they related to the stoning, which was adjudged as the punishment of the blasphemer. If, how- ever, I translate the passage quite literally thus, " Whoever blasphemeth his God, shall bear his sin. Whoever utters the name Jehovah, shall die; the whole congregation shall stone him ;" it looks as if the utterer of the name was to be punished differently from, and more severely than, the blasphemer; as, indeed, Philo has remarked, though with quite another view. But then, it is to be considered, fur- ther, that the crime is not so much as distinctly expressed unless we explain the 16th verse by, and, in some measure, include it in, the one before it. The verb Nakab may as well mean to write, as to utter ; and, therefore, even wri- ting the name Jehovah, might seem to have been prohibit- ed; and yet Moses has done that in every page of his wri- tings. Let it, however, be rendered utter ; was then all ut- terance of the name Jehovah forbidden 1 How then was it to be used, and for what purpose did God assume it 1 , This law, then, is surely to be understood with some limi- tation 1 But with what limitation 1 Was the priest alone to utter the name, as the Jews think 1 or durst laymen also utter it, if they only did so in a holy manner 1 Durst it be mentioned in an oath, or in prayer 1 Was it permitted in instructing children 1 or was only the inconsiderate use of it prohibited'? With regard to all this, we find nothing in this law, and yet it is the only one that treats on this sub- ject ; nor is it like other laws, illustrated by usage ; for the name Jehovah was new, and it was Moses who first dis- tinguished the God who sent him, by this philosophically sublime and expressive title. Here, then, we should have some crime, to whichthepunishmentof death was annexed, and yet it was not rightly understood what it was, nor wherein it consisted. These doubts have prompted me to connect the 16tt verse more closely with the 15th ; so that to vtt^r the nnm^ Jehovah, becomes equivalent to uttering it in blasphc' my ; and this explanation is the more probable, because in the story which gave occasion to the law, we find, ver. IL that the Egyptian had uttered the name, and blasphemed. The meaning then of the words, of which I shall first give a literal translation thus, — A man, a man, (that is, any man whatever, whether native or stranger,) who blasphemeth his God, shall bear his sin, find whoever uttereth the natne Jeho- vah shall die ; the whole congregation shall stone him — will be the following : " If any man blaspheme God, the God whom he deems his God, (th'e Israelite, the true, and the heathen , a false God,) it is a heinous sin. It is a sin even in the hea •' then, to blaspheme what, according to his own opinion, is3 god. Such a person shall not escape his judge; althoughf the magistrate has no right to interfere in the matter, bu!^ must leave it to the true or false God, that he may be his' own judge. It is, besides, uncertain whom the man may have meant, when he cursed God, and here the law as-^ sumes the milder supposition. But if any one, in blaspht ming, expressly mention the name Jehovah, so -that 1 Chap. 24. LEVITICUS. 83 uoubt can remain, whether he meant to blaspheme the true or a false God, lie shall be stoned to death." In this way the criminal law, with respect to blasphe- mers, woald undergo a very material alteration ; nor would it be ^very blaphemy, but only that which was distinguish- vA by a certain specific aggravation, that incurred capital inunshment ; all other cases being left to the judgment of God, because the blasphemer cannot be convicted of having blasphemed the true God, and because God is certainly •dble to avenge himself, if he think fit, without having oc- casion for our aid; Judg. vi. 30, 31. And this appears quite suitable to the spirit of those times, and is a great mit- iiraiion of the rigour of the law. In our times, a legislator \\ (jiild, perhaps, grant to the blasphemer the salvo of not bein<< in his right mind. — At any rate, blasphemy, inferred merely by deductions, or what is called blasphemous doc- trine, could not be punished by the law. In later times, the Jews were extremely prone to construe every thing that did not please them, at once into blasphemy; and their Zealots, as they were called, arrogated to themselves the right of punishing on the spot, and without the smallest judicial inquiry, any supposed blasphemy ; although per- naps they had stopped their ears against it, and were, there- fore, but bad judges of its real nature. Both the one and the other of these measures are repugnant to the Mosaic statute. Even the utterlr of aggravated blasphemy was not put to death on the spot, but taken into custody, until God could be consulted as lo his fate. We must not, there- fore, charge the Mosaic law with those illegal outrages, to which the zeal of the later Jews prompted them to resort. — jMichaelis. Ver. 19. And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour : as he hath done, so shall it be done unto him ; 20. Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again. In cases of corporal injuries done to free persons, (for the same rule did not extend to servants, they being less pro- tected members of the community,) that far severer law of retaliation operated, whose language is, " Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth ;" and upon that law I must here expatiate more fully, because it is so far removed from our laws, that il sometimes appears to us really barbarous, or, as others would say, unchristian. Barbarous, however, it was not ; for those very nations of antiquity whom we look upon as most civilized, viz. the Athenians and Romans, had this n law in the days of their freedom. But the singular cir- cumstance respecting it is, that it is, strictly speaking, only suited to a free people, and where the poorest citizen has equal rights with the greatest man that can injure him ; al- though, no doubt, it may subsist under an aristocracy and a monarchy also, as long as no infringement is made on liberty, and on the equality of the lowest with the highest, in point of rights. Where, however, the eye of a nobleman is of more value than that of a peasant, it would be a very Ereposterous and inconvenient law ; and where, for the enefit of the great, attempts might out of friendship be made to pervert justice, it is much more consonant to equity, in the case of such corporal injuries, to leave the determi- nation of the punishment to the decision of the judge. It would seem that Moses retained the law of retaliation, from a more ancient, and a very natural, law of usage. It will be well worth our while to hear what he himself says on the subject of a lav/, so strange to us, and yet so common among ancient free nations. His _^rsf statute respecting it, clearly presupposes retaliation as consuetudinary, and only applies it to the very special case of a pregnant woman be- ing pushed, by two men quarrelling w'ith each other, and therebv receiving an injury ; the man who pushed her, be- ing adjudged to pay " life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, brand for brand, wound for wound, bruise for bruise," Exod. xxi. 23 — 25. The second statute likewise occurs but incidentally; when, on occasion of blasphemy uttered by an Egyptian, it was or- damed that both Israelites and strangers should have one and the same criminal law ; and it is added, by way of ex- ample, " Whoever shall injure his neighbour in his person, shall receive even as he hath given : eye for eye, wound ' for wound, tooth for tooth; even as he hath injured another, so shall it be done to himself in return ;" Lev. xxiv. 19, 20. What Moses then says (incidentally, in fact, and presup- posing a more ancient law of usage) concerning the pun- ishment of retaliation, I understand under the two follow- ing limitations : — 1. When the injury is either deliberate, or at east in con- sequence of our fault ; (an instance of which last is that mentioned above, from Exod. xxi. 23, where a woman is hurt by two men fighting ; an act of outrage of which they ought not to have been guilty ;) but not where there is either no fault, or at any rate but an inadvertence ; as w^here one man pushes out another's eye undesignedly. This limitation every one will admit, who remembers thy* Moses was so far from meaning to punish unpremeditated homicide by the law of retaliation, that he established an asylum for the unfortunate manslayer, to secure him from the fury of the Goel. 2. The person who suflfered any personal injury, retained (for he is nowhere deprived of it) the natural right of ab- staining, if he chose, from all complaint, and even of re- tracting a complaint already made, and remitting the pun- ishment, if the other compounded with him for what we should call a pecuniary indemnity, or, to use the Hebrew expression, a ransom. Not to mention that this right is quite natural and obvious, and scarcely requires to be no- ticed in a penal statute, it maybe observed, that among the Israelites such pecuniary expiations had been previously common, even m the case of deliberate murder, as they still are among the Orientals, and that in this case alone did Moses find it necessary to prohibit the acceptance of any such compensation ; Numb. xxxv. 31. If it was ^Jus- tomary in cases of deliberate murder, we may conclude with certainty, that it would frequently be accepted for the loss of a tooth or an eye ; but as Moses did not prohibi.t this, we must suppose that the ancient usage still continued to prevail. ' But is not the punishment of retaliation extremely rude 1 Does it not savour strongly of ancient barbarism 1 and must not every legislator, who out of philanthropy wishes the nobleman to preserve his own eyes, though he may pre- viously havebeaten outthoseof theworthlesspeasant,natur- ally keep at as great a d istance here as possible from the brutal law of ancient times 1 And was not Moses then very much to blame, I will not say in giving such a law, for that can- not be laid to his charge, but in retaining it from ancient usage % Let us listen with candour, to what may be said both for and against this species of punishment. I. In favour of it, then, we may observe — 1. That it is the first punishment that will naturally oc- cur to every legislator when left to himself; nor can any one justly complain, that that should happen to himsell', which he has done to another: for he hasjcertainly cause to be thankful, that he does not suffer more : since not only self-revenge, as authorized by Xhe. jus nature, but also pun- ishments in civil society generally go much greater lengths, and retaliate for" evils that have been sufiered, perhaps tenfold. 2. That it has a more powerful effect than any other punishment in deterring from personal injuries ; and is, indeed, almost the only adequate means of attaining this end of punishment. Pecuniary punishments will not be very formidable to the man of opulence, particularly if they are regulated by the rank of the person injured ; nor will they, of course, ^o much to promote the security of the poor : nay, even though corporal punishments be legal, if they only rest with the discretion of the judge, (and here, that is a very alarming and despotically-sounding expres- sion.) not only is not the security of the poor man thereby promoted, because the judge's discretion is generally pretty favourable to the great, but his humiliation becomes, in fact, only the greater. Should the nobleman, for instance, put out the eye of a peasant, and the judge estimate the loss at 1000 rix-'dollars, which, though a sum pretty considerable in itself, can give the former but little concern ; but the peasant, on the other hand, who puts out a nobleman's eye, be dragged to the gallows in a cart, though quite ready to pay him the same sum, which indeed many a peasant, in some countries, could very easily raise; such an inequality in the Jaw would, to a man of spirit, who feels his bands, . and who is both able and willing to defend his country with them, prove rather intolerable. Under such a law, can the 84 LEVITICUS. Chap. 24 man in an humble station possibly have that security for sound limbs, that he must wish, and has a right to demand, from the community 1 When, on the contrary, the greatest and richest man in the land knows, that if he puts out the eye of a peasant, the latter has* a right to insist that Ms eye be put out in return, that a sentence to that eifect will actu- ally be pronounced, and the said punishment inflicted, with- out the least respect to his rank, or his noble eye being con- sidered as one whit better than the peasant's ; and that he lias no possible way of saving it, but by humbling himself before the other, as deeply as may be necessary to work upon his compassion, and make him relent, besides paying him as much money as he deems a satisfactory compensa- tions for his loss ; every one will be convinced (without my swearing to prove it) that the nobleman will bethink him- self, before he put out any one's eye. The argument is precisely the same in the case of othf r injuries, down to the loss of a tooth ; concerning which the ancient jus ta- lmas came at last to teach so differeut a doctrine. If here it be objected, (and no djubt the objection has weight,) that notwithstanding the 'exclusion of the jus ta- lionis, from our law, and its superior mildness in all re- spects, we scarcely ever see an instance of an eye put out in deliberate malice ; I be^ leave to observe in answer, that this is, in fact, to be ascribed in a great measure, to the superior mildness and refinement of our manners : but such manners are not found in all nations; they certainly were not found in the ancient nations that approached nearer to ihe state of nature; nor yet do we find them among the people of southern countries ; whose rage is more ma- licious, and loves to leave a lasting memorial behind it, in those on whom it is vented. By the gradually refined man- ners, therefore, of our more northerly regions, we can hardly expect that the ancient law of retaliation, should in southern nations have' been regulated. Add to this, that among us, since the introduction of luxury and more effemi- nate education, or in consequence of hereditary disease, the nobleman has very seldom sucli bodily strength as to be a match for a peasant ; and if it came to the driving Cut of teeth or eyes, would run the risk of losing two of eilner, before the latter lost one. There are, besides, to be taken into consideration several other fortunate circum- stances, which though not, properly speaking, connected with our law, -serve nevertheless to remedy its defects. For in- stance, most of the people of distinction among us are at the same time servants to the sovereign, and as such have both honour and revenues, and would sink into a sort of nothing- ness if they lost their posts ; but such are the humane ideas of many sovereigns, that they would no longer retain in their service the person who had put out a poor man's eye, unless circumstances appeared that were highly allevialive of the outrage, or that he made a satisfactory compensation for it. But the advantage which 7/;c thus derive from our manners is not to be met with in every democracy or aristoc- racy; for there, as posts are conferred either by laws, or by votes, of which no individual is ashamed, so neither are they taken away without legal authority. 3. That in the state of nature every man has a right to take revenge at his own hand for any deliberate personal injury, such as the loss of an eye, &c. is perhaps undenia- ble. In fact, by the law of nature such revenge might be carried still further : but if it be confined within the limits of strict retaliation, the law of nature at any rate (for of morality I do not now speak) can certainly have nothing to object against it. Now, in tne state of civil society, every man divests himself of the right in question; but then he justly expects, in return, that society will, after proper in- quiry, duly exercise revenge in his room. Morality may say , what it will to our revenge, (and certainly it does not abso- k tely condemn it,) but we are all naturally vindictive, and tJM tc such a degree, that when we are grossly injured we feel a most irksome sort of disquietude and feverish heat, until we have gratified our revenge. Now, when creatures, thus constituted, are the citizens of any government, can we imagine that they will ever give up the prerogative of re- venge, without looking for some equivalent in return '? If the state means to withhold that equivalent, and yet pro- hibit the exercise of revenge, it must begin by regenerating human nature: or, if it be said, that God and his grace can alone effect such a change, and that whoever lays open his heart to grace, will never desire revenge, I can only say, that we must then figure to ourselves a stale consisting of none but people all truly regenerated ; but such a state the world has never yet seen. 4. If the law of re^iZiafton, were abrogated, nothing could be more natural, if the lower classes had not, by long con- straint and oppression, become too much humbled, than for the poor man, who had received any personal injury, still to revenge it at his own hand, and more especially to lie in wait for his rich oppressor, at whom he could not come with open force, and put out his eye, with as little warning and ceremony as he had done" his. And what could in such a case be done ; were justice to be observed, and the poor man who only requited the injury he had re- ceived, to experience no severer punishment than he who set him the example 1 It might, no doubt, be said, that his conduct, in thus lying in wait, and in deliberately avenging his own quarrel, in contempt of a legal prohibition, aggra- vated his guilt in every respect; t)ut where the injured person, aware that the laws gave him no reparation, only didm instanti, what every man of spirit would very natu- rally do, andw'hat, if he did not go beyond blows, even our laws would excuse him for doing — if he only flew with all possible fury upon the person who had put out his eye, and tried to put out his in return ; we should not, perhaps, think him deserving of so severe a punishment for having thus requited like for like, as the person who had begun the quarrel. Now this immediate s^lf-revenge would, among a people who retained any feeling of their dignity, and their natural equality with even the most distinguished of their fellow-citizens, be the usual plan : and if no one at- tempts any such thing, we can scarcely impute it to the re- fined manners of the brawny peasantry, and even of the very lowest of the people, but rather to the melancholy cir- cuniistance, of their having become too tame, and having forgotten that they are not slaves, but, in point of rights, on a footing of equality with the rest of their countrymen. 5. Even our own laws admit the right of retaliation, and that too, in rather an equivocal case, and where an injury is not actually done, but only intended, and perhaps not even that. They allow us, in the case of having been ca- lumniated, to sue the person who has falsely and mali- ciously charged us with any crime, for the same penalty, which the crime itself incurs according to the laws. No doubt, judgment is rarely pronounced in terms of our com- plaint, and much here depends on the discretion of the judge ; but still it is clear, that the laws, in authorizing any such suit, presuppose the equity of the ji/s talionis. II. The chief arguments against the law in question may, perhaps, be found comprehended Under the following objections, which are usually urged against it. 1. There are many injuries, where it would be absurd to give the sufferer a right to retaliation :, in the cate of adultery, for instance, to permit the injured husband to sleep with the wife of the adulterer in return. In regard to this objection, however, some misconception seems to lie at bottom. It is not every description of injuries that we here speak of, but only of personal injuries : nor yet of any retaliation that the sufferer himself may choose to exact, such, for instance, as thrusting out another's eyes or teeth : but only of a punishment that depends upon, and is to be inflicted by the magistrate. "Were any person to deduce all sorts of punishments from the jus talionis, this objec- tion would hold : but it does not hold in the case of a legis- lator appointing the puriishment of retaliation for persona^ injuries. 2. In many cases it is difficult to requite just as much and no more, than has been suffered ; for instance, where a man has thrust out one of another man's teeth, he may in suffering retaliation, very easily lose tm-o teeth by on* stroke. In like manner, it would be diflScult to inllict i wound of exactly the same size and depth with that given and neither larger nor deeper. And what shall be done where a man, having but one eye, happens to thrust ou one of his neighbour's'? Shall he' lose his only eye by wai of retaliation 7 This would be to make him suffer a mucl more serious injury than he had caused : for now he wonlc be quite blind, whereas he had only made the other one eyed, like himself Here I will make much greater con cessions than the opponents of the law of retaliation ar* wont to demand. For had they known human nature, the;" would have stated in addition, and I. for my own part, read ily grant them, that punishment by retaliation is in almos every case, a much more sensible evil, than the origina di HAP. 24. LEVITICUS. 8$ injury: for every pain and every evil to which we look ibrward, is, by mere anticipation and fear, aggravated more than a hundred fold ; the pang of a moment is ex- tended to hours, days, weeks, &c. ; and when it actually takes placCj every individual part of the evil is felt in the utmost perfection, by both soul and body, in consequence i)f its being expected. The adversaries of the lex talio- nis were bad philosophers, when, with all their benevo- ence, this observation escaped them. — But after all, it ;p-ould, even in conjunction with what went before, form 10 objection to the law in question ; for this, in fact, is no- hing more than what commonly takes place in all pun- ishments, and in all the variety of revenge that we dread, jven in the state of nature. If I had, in that state, beat out .;he eye of one of my neighbours, I should ahvays be afraid :hat he, or his son, or his father, or his brother, or some Dther friend, or, perhaps some person hired for the purpose, might lie in wait for me, and beat out one of mine in re- turn; and, under this unnecessary fear, I should really and truly be much more unhappy, than the man whose eye I beat out; in my very dreams, I should, who knows how of- ten, lose an eye with pain and horror ; and although, when r awoke again, I found myself possessed of it, I should, at first, be uncertain, perhaps, whether it had been a dream or not ; and, stupified with fear, in the darkness of the night, I should be anxious to try whether it could see or not. Nay, not only should I be afraid of this, but well aware that revenge always studies to retaliate beyond what it suffers, I should anticipate a more serious injury than I had caused, the loss of an eye perhaps for a tooth, or even the loss of life itself, in short, every thing that is bad : and, under these continual apprehensions, I should be extremely miserable, even though the injured person might never ac- tually retaliate the injury. Should he ever get me into his hands, and repay me merely according to the jus talionis, this would be a fresh addition to my misery ; unless, in- deed, it might be said, that I ought to look upon it as good luck, because I should no longer have to live in perpetual leri'or. Now these are nothing inore than the terrors of conscience, that natural and awful avenger of all the crimes we commit, and, in the mythologies of the Greeks and Ro- mans, represented under the ijnage of the Furies ; and thus, for wise ends, hath nature constituted our minds, to prevent us from injuring one another. Even in the case of murder, it is precisely the same. Whoever, in the state of nature, has perpetrated that crime, will continually be in fear of the son or friend of the deceased, as his Goel; will, while awake, fancy a hundred times that he sees him, and tremble at the thoughts of him, how distant so- ever he may be; and will be as often disturbed when asleep, by seeing him in his dreams, and thinking that he feels him giving him the fatal stab. In a word, he will, jboth sleeping and waking, die a thousand deaths. If he think this unjust, and too severe, let him blame God and nature, for having annexed such variety of wretchedness to the commission of guilt ; and blame himself for being such a fool as to let such stuff come into his imagination. If, again, it is committed by a member of civil society, and if (which is the mildest punishment of all those now in use) it costs him his head, he certainly, in suffering even this retaliation, suffers much more than the person whom he murdered ; who had only a few minutes agony, which his rage, in self-defence, would scarcely let him feel; whereas he, in his prison, anticipates his death for weeks, and feels in imagination, which aggravates every evil, the sword of justice every moment on his neck ; and at last, when he is actually brought out to execution, is so much overwhelmed by the previous feelings of death, that there have been instances of malefactors, who, having a pardon given them on the scaffold, were already so near death, that they could not be saved even by blood-letting, but died. las thoroughly as if they had actually been beheaded. But thus to die of agony, is a much more terrible death than to die of mere wounds by the hand of a murderer. This pb- jection, therefore, amounts to nothing at all ; only there is another, which it is understood to imply, viz. that the inju- rious party is under no obligaliovv to suffer more evil than he has (lone ; and this was actually the reasoning of the phi- losopher Favorinus, whom A. Gellius intrt)duces as speak- ing on this subject, in his Nodes Atticre. But what igno- •rance doth such reasoning show of all the laws that have been introduced into all nations, and above all, that any man may, from his own feelings, know of the nature of re- venge, if he pay but ever so little attention to what passes within him. The injurious party has no right to demand that the retaliation to which he subjects himself, shall not exceed the injury ; for upon the same principle on which he did an injury to another, without any precedent or prov- ocation, may the sufferer, following his example, requite him, in terms of his own law, with ten times, or ten thou- sand times, as great an injury. The relations between no- thing and something, and between something and infmity, are alike : they both surpass all numeration. As to the morality of such a procedure, and whether God approves of evils being thus infinitely increased, I am not here con- cerned with deciding. The^resent question relates not to an evil infinitely augmented, but only of one requited with some addition. If, however, the injurious party have it requited him even in an infinite degree, he can have no- thing more to sav, than that as he had done, so had he suf- fered, wrong, feul putting this infinity entirely out of the question ; in all the circumstances wherein human be- ings can be placed together, proceeding from the rudest state of nature, and what is a relic of it, the consuetudinary law of duelling, through every stage of society, un^l we arrive at the best-regulated commonwealth, it holds as a fundamental principle, that the man who has caused evil to another, has no reason to complain if he should suffer a greater evil in return. In the state of nature, self-revenge goes certainly much beyond the offence, and would go infi- nite lengths, if not restrained at last by pity, or by con- tempt of its victim, or by the suggestions of magnanimity. In the old German proverb, which is strongly expressive of a national idea, it is said, (Auf eine Maulschelle gehort ein Dolch,) " Every blow has its dagger." The point of honour, in duelling, insists on revenge with the sword ; and the whip, with the pistol ; but where people's ideas are not so artificial, they find a satisfaction in, and plume them- selves on, having given for OTie blow, two or more in return. — In the state of civil society, the design of punishment is to deter from crimes; for which purpose, a bare requital in kind will not be sufficient, because the criminal may hope to escape detection, or to escape from justice, and of course his fear of punishment is by its uncertainty materially lessened ; and hence punishments are here much more severe, and by one example, many thousands are deterred from a repetition of the crime : so, that unless a man chooses to take the consequences, and to serve the public as an example in terrorem, he must abstain from injuring his neighbour. In the case of theft, restitution, with considera- ble additions, would not be accounted too severe, but on the contrary a very mild punishment for the crime ; and vet here more is given back than was taken away. — But 1 here stop short, because I mean to offer some general remarks on the relation of punishments to crimes, in the Essay which I have already mentioned my intention of adding as an Appendix to this work. This observation only shall I yet offer in the meantime. The objection ar- gues not only against the retaliation of personal injuries, now the suijject of dispute, but against all punishments whatever, which consist of any evil that is at all a matter of feeling, or which, by fear and anticipation, may become aggravations of such evils ; and many inferences flow from it, which to the objector himself must appear very strange, and would go at any rate to destroy all the security of hu- man life. Assassination, for instance, and child-murder, would on this principle be mere trifles, and by no means worthy of being punished with death. The assassin might say, " The person, whom I murdered, did not know what befell him. Jffe was no sooner stabbed than he fell; and he died, without knowing it, altogether unexpectedly, and in the midst of joy ; and if I must die on his account, let my death be equally easy and unexpected. I only beg that people may not take it into their heads to declare me an out- law, else shall. I at every step be accompanied with the dread of death, and, in imagination, die a hundred thou- sand times instead of once." — The child-murderer, again, might say all this, and thus much more : " The child whom I despatched, knew nothing of the worth and enjoyroent of life, and had been in a state of such obscure sensibilities, that his pain was next to nothing ;" thus insinuating, that whenever he himself should happen to come into the same state, that is, to return to his mother's womb and be born again, by a sort of Pythagorean Metempsychosis, he might 86 LEVITICUS. Chap. 24. then be punished for the crime in question ; but that, till then, justice required his punishment to be delayed, because to make him die at present, would be doing him very great injustice. 3. The law of retaliation is barbarous. I do not see why it should be considered as more barbarous than hanging or beheading ; and with the very same justice with w^hich this assertion is made, it may in like manner be asserted, that to demand payment of a debt is base and avaricious, or that every punishment which is less severe than that of like for like, is tit only for a state where the people are op- pressed and enslaved. The one assertion is just like the other, and neither of them proves any thing. The latter indeed would, in these times, manifest a stronger tone of sympathy, and perhaps more truth, than in former ages. 4. The sight of so many mutilated persons who, by the law of retaliation, had had an eye beat out, or a hand chop- Sed off, or a nose bitten away, &,c. &c., would be extremely isagreeable; and would notonlybeapunishment tothe cul- prits themselves, but to every person of the least degree of sensibility, and especially to the fair sex at the time of con- ception, when they are afraid of having their imaginations aftected by disgusting objects. This I readily grant; but I believe, at the same time, that where other circumstances, and the character of the people are the same, these are sights that will be much more rarely seen where the lex talionis is established, than where it is not. For everyone will then be the more careful to avoid wounding or maim- ing his neighbour, in a quarrel, or in a passion ; and cer- tainly nobody will attempt any such thing after deliberate premeditation, when he knows that he must himself lose the same member of his body, of which he deprives his neighbour. Besides, it is certain that the law of retaliation will be but seldom enforced, and be chiefly confined to threatenings, and measures m terrorem. The man who has beat out the eye or tooth of another, or cut oif his arm, will be at all possible pains to obtain his forgiveness, and a remis- sion of the legal punishment. He will humble himself be- fore him, and beg his pardon; not as we see sometimes done, with an air of proud contempt ; but even the man of highest rank will heartily do so before the meanest of his dependants ; will ever after honour him as his forgiver, and at the same time gladly make him any pecuniar)- re- compense in his power. In such a case, the sufferer of the injury will be compassionate and generous, or, if not sufficiently either the one or the other, at any rate he will have as much Ipve of money as, when the violence of his revenge has been a little mitigated by the humiliation and entreaties of his adversary, to^ accept the proffered peace-offering, and let self-interest settle the account be- tween them. Men are naturally vindictive ; but whenever we meet with humble apologies, and the injurious person throws himself on our mercy, we are in general sufficiently inclined to forget our wrongs ; so much so, indeed, that to some people it is nothing less than intolerable punishment to hear such apologies, and they forget the injuries they have suffered, merely when they know that their author regrets them. Even those whose sentiments are not so re- fined, will still, when their fury is abated, yield to the power of gold. It was thus that at Rome the lex talionis came gradually into perfect desuetude, and gave place to a pecuniary compefisation, depending on the discretion of the praetor ; and that, though there had been nothing else, was one bad consequence of the change; for to a free man, the discretion of a judge is a term that sounds very sus- piciously. 5. Sound morality cannot approve of that revenge, which nothing short of a repetition of the same injury will satisfy, and which insists on beating out the eye of another, if he has beaten out ours. This too I readily admit ; but then morality and civil law are not one and the same thing; and the latter, as long as it has to do with people who are not all paragons of perfect virtue, must tolerate many things on account of hardness of .heart, to avoid greater evils. Thus, for instance, as long as the greatest, or the greater part of the people are still prone to revenge, the law must give injured persons the means of obtaining sat- isfaction for their wrongs, else will the consequence be, that they will take revenge ai their own hands; and thus, instead of authoritative punishments, none other will be known than that of personal revenge, which is always dangerous, by being carried beyond due bounds, and often affects the innocent, and provokes to fresh acts of ven- geance. To this, however, we must add what has been already observed, that although those, who are in the least injured, will inexorably abide by the law of retaliation, they will still be satisfied with professions of repentance, with apologies, and with pecuniary compensations. The law does not peremptorily command an injured person tc avail himself of the right of retaliation, without any alter- native. It only fixes the punishment to which the author of an injury must submit, if he cannot compound matters with the injured party. It thus deters from outrages, be- cause every one must be afraid, lest the sufterer insist upon his right, and in the case of personal mutilation, compei the person who has caused it, to agree to such terms oJ compensation, as he would otherwise have refused to offer. 6. Christ, in his sermon on the mount, condemns that revenge which requires eye for eye, and tooth for tooth ; (Matt. V.38, 39;) and consequently the law of retaliation ir unchristian. This is, in fact, the same objection with the preceding, and therefore already answered. Christ does not ' find fault with the Mosaic statute of eye for eye, and tooth for tooth ; — fuT he has throughout his whole sermon nothing to do with Moses, and neither expounds nor controvert? his doctrines — he only condemns the bad morality of the Pharisees, which they thought fit to propound in his words. In the present instance, these expositors, confounded, as on many other occasions, civil law and morality together; and when the moral question was. How far may I be al- lowed to carry my resentment, and gratify my thirst for revenge'? they answered in the words which Moses ad- dressed, not tothe injured,\iX\i to the injuring party, or to the judge, and said, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. That Christ has no intention of controverting, or censuring the lawsol Moses, but merely the expositions of the Pharisees, is manifest, from comparing his own doctrine with that ol Moses. Moses addresses the magistrate, or the delinquent who has mutilated his neighbour, and says. Thou, delin^ quent, art bound to give eye for eye, tooth for tooth ; and thou, judge, to pro7iou7ice sentence to that effect. Christ, on the other hand, manifestly addresses the person injured, and forbids him to be vindictive ; Ye hate heard, that it is said, eye for eye, tooth for tooth ; but I command you not to requite evil ; but whoever strikes you on the right cheeky . offer to him also the left. How this last clause is to be un- . derstood ; whether it prohibits suing for revenge, and , whether one should actually hold up the left cheek to the , person who has slapped the right, it is not my business here to decide, because I am not explaining the sermon on the, mount. But as long as a people is not composed of citi- zens, whose temper and conduct are altogether in conform- ity to the doctrine of the sermon on the mount, civil laws, which do not, as Christ himself says, permit many things, on account of the hardness of the people's hearts, and which presuppose such an exalted pitch of perfect virtue, will be improper and unwise. I am far from meaning, by Avhat Ij have now said in defence of the lex talionis, to assert that it is the only proper punishment in the case of personal ^ injuries, or that it ought to be introduced into every state, in which it is not yet in use ; but only that where it already, operates, and especially in the Mosaic policy, it does not merit censure. Here also it ought to be considered, that the same style of law is not equally suitable to every state. To southern countries the law of retaliation appears to be better adapted, and, in some respects, more necessary, than to northern; because in southern countries, such as Italy, Portugal, Palestine, and Arabia, the desire of revenge is generally more violent, and of longer duration, than with us in the 50th degree of latitude, who sooner forgive and forget injuries, and are really magnanimous in our revenge. Where it is once established, as where Moses found it already in force, it is dangerous to attempt its abrogation, because the people accustomed to it might not be willing to give it up, and would, of course, enforce it themselves. But to introduce it among us would appear to be needless ; because we hear of or see so few in.stances of personal in- juries ; for though we have people among us who want an eye, there are none who owe the loss of it to deliberate rnalice, nor is it by any means a trait of our national char- acter, that we delight in inflicting permanent injuries on one another. A German is commonly too magnanimous to think of any such thing. Blows he will give, and show his superiority over his enemy ; but even the peasant in the ' Chap. 25. LEVITICUS. 87 utmost violence of rage, and though he hardly knows of any particular punishment for such an offence, will not, at any rate, willingly beat out his neighbour's eye, or think of giving him any such lasting mark of his revenge, as the inhabitant of a southern country, or that rare character among us, to whom, in lower Saxony, the epithet glupisch is applied, would exult in having left behind him. Ex- cept in cases of necessity, it is always a hazardous and doubtful experiment to alter laws, or to increase the se- verity of punishments ; and with regard to uncommon crimes, a legislator will always decline taking' any notice of them, or will, at any rate, make no new laws in relation to them, lest he should thus only make them known ; he will think it better to let them quietly rest under the an- cient national abhorrence, with which they are regarded. Thus as we are not accustomed to the law of retaliation, it would appear to us cruel, and no injured person would, for fear of the universal outcry it would raise against him, attempt commencing an action to enforce it : so that, as frequently happens in such cases, the increased severity of the punishment would prove nothing else than a sort of impunity to the person who had committed the crime. The more nearly that a people approaches to a state of nature, the more suitable to their circumstances is the law of re- taliation : in like manner, it agrees better with a democra- cy, than with any of the other forms of government : al- though, no doubt, to these it can accommodate itself, and did subsist in Rome under a strong mixture of aristocracy. The following distinction, likewise, which has not, per- hajps, been theoretically considered, is a very striking one. "Wiiere every citizen is a soldier, and defends his country with the strength of his arm, the law in question may an- swer well enough; but where there is one particular class of men, who follow the profession of arms, whether as hired soldiers, according to our present system, or, accord- ing to the feudal plan in the middle ages, as gentlemen, with land given them in fee instead of pay, there, at least, if crimes were very frequent, it could not be conveniently enforced without many exceptions. For if the soldier had an eye dug out, or his right arm, hand, or thumb, mutilated, he would not only be punished himself, but his country would also suffer, in his being rendered unfit for its defence. Here, therefore, there would require to be one law for the protectors, and another for the protected ; at least, unless soldiers could be had in more than sufficient numbers. Many dlher dangers of the same kind would attend an alteration of the law; which is, in every case, a very hazardous experiment. At the same time, I readily own, that in cases of personal injury, I have no great partiality for the pleasure of the judge, but would infinitely prefer the decision of laws, that should place the high and. the low on an equal footing, and estimate the tooth of a peasant at the same rate with that of a lord, particularly where the former must gnaw crusts, and the latter can have crumb if he chooses. — MicHAELis, CHAPTER XXV. Ver. 23. The land shall not be sold for ever ; for the land is mine ; for ye are strangers and so- journers with me. 24. And in all the land of your possession, ye shall grant a redemption for the land. 25. If thy brother be waxen poor, and hath sold away some of his possession, and if any of his kin come to redeem it, then shall he redeem that which his brother sold. 26. And if the man have none to redeem it, and himself '. be able to redeem it ; 27. Then let him count the years of the sale thereof, and restore the overplus unto the man to whom he sold it ; that he may return unto his possession. 28. But if he be not able to restore it to him, then that which is sold shall remain in the hand of him that hath bought it until the year of jubilee: and in the jubilee it shall go out, and he shall return unto his possession. Moses declared God, who honoured the Israelites by call- ing himself their king, the sole lord-proprietary of all the land of promjse, in which he was about to settle them by his most special providence; while the people were to be merely his tenants, and without any right to alienate their possessions in perpetuity, Lev. xxv. 23. It was, indeed, allowable for a proprietor to sell his land for a certain pe- riod ; but every fiftieth year, which Moses denominated the year of jubilee, it returned without any redemption to its ancient owner, or his heirs. Hence Moses very just- ly observes, that this was a sale, not of the land, but only ol its crops, between the period of sale and the year of jubi- lee. It was reasonable that the value of a field should be estimated higher or lower, according as it came to sale at a longer or shorter period preceding that year ; and Moses therefore admonished the Israelites, (Lev. xxv. 14 — 16,) against taking unjust advantage of the ignorant and simple in this particular on such occasions. This purchase of crops, however, must have been a very profitable specula- tion, because no man would lay out his money for such a length of time, and encounter all risks, (that of war not excepted,) as he was obliged to do, unless he purchased at a very cheap rate. It was not in his power to rid himselt of those risks, by abandoning the bargain, as a lessee may his lease, and re-demanding the money expended, because at the year of jubilee all debts became instantly extin- guished. He would, therefore, always take care to pur- chase on such terms, as, allowing for the very worst that could happen, might secure him from loss, and even yield him some profit — at least the interest of his money, prohib- ited as all usury was by the law. Hence, and as a con- sequence of the principle, that the lands were to feed those to whose families they belonged, there was established a law of redenrption, or right of re-purchase, which put it in the power of a seller, if before the return of tjie year orf jubilee nis circumstances permitted him, to btfir back thfi yet re- maining crops, after deducting the amotmt of those already reaped by the purchaser, at the same ptice for which they were originally sold : and of this right, even the nearest relation of the seller, or, as the Hebrews termed him, his Goel, might likewise avail himself, if he had the means. Lev. xxv. 24—28. The advantages of this law, if sacredly observed, would have been great. It served, in \\ve first place, to perpetuate that equality among the citizens, which Moses at first es- tablished, and which was suitable to the spirit of the democ- racy, by putting it out of the power of any flourishing citi- zen to become, by the acquisition of exorbitant wealth, and the accumulation of extensive landed property, too formidable to the state, or in other words, a little prince, whose influence could carry every thing before it,— In the second place, it rendered it impossible that any Israelite could be born to absolute poverty, for every one had his hereditary land ; and if that was sold, or he himself from poverty compelled to become a servant, at the coming of the year of jubilee he recovered his property. And hence, perhaps, Moses might have been able with some justice to say, what we read in most of the versions of Deut. xv. 4, There will not he a poor man among you. I doubt, how- ever, whether that be the true meaning of the original words. For in the 11th verse of this same chapter, he as- sures them that they should never he vnthout poor ; to pre- vent which, indeed, is impossible for any legislator, be- cause, in spite of every precaution that laws can take, some people win become poor, either by misfortunes or mis- conduct. But here, if a man happened to be reduced to poverty, before the expiry of fifty years, either he himself, or his descendants, had their circumstances repaired by the legal recovery of their landed property, which though in- deed small, then became perfectly free and unincumbered, — In the third place, it served to prevent the strength of the country from being impaired, by cutting off one, and per- haps the greatest cause of emigration, viz. poverty. No Israelite needed to leave his home on that ground. Here, to be sure, the extraordinary case of any public calamity that might make the lands lose their value, must be except- ed. But it was enough that in ordinary cases the law took away the chief inducement to emigration, by such a judi- cious provision as made it the interest of the people to re- main contented at home. — In the fourth place, as every man had his hereditary land, this law, by its manifest ten- dency to encourage marriage, rather served to promote the population of the country, than to impair it. — In the fifth. place, the land being divided into numerous small portions, S8 LEVITICUS. Chap. 26. each cultivated by the father of a family, acquainted with it from his infancy, and naturally attached to it as the in- alienable property of his family, could not fail in conse- quence of this law, to be better managed, and more produc- tive, than large estates in the hands of tenants and day- labourers could ever have been. — And, lastly, this institu- tion served to attach every Israelite to his country in the strongest manner, by suggesting to him that, if he had to fight in its defence, he would at the same time be defending his own property, which it was, moreover, out of his power to convert into money, wherewith he might betake himself to a more peaceful habitation elsewhere. — Michaelis. CHAPTER XXVI, Ver. 33. And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you ; and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste. By the concurring testimony of all travellers, Judea may now be called a field of ruins. Columns, the memorials of ancient magnificence, now covered with rubbish, and buried Under ruins, may be found in all Syria. From Mount Tabor is beheld an immensity of plains, interspersed with hamlets, fortresses, and heaps of ruins. The buildings on that mountain were destroyed and laid waste by the Sultan of Egypt in 1290, and the accumulated vestiges of succes- sive forts and ruins are now mingled in one common and ext(>nsive desolation. Of the celebrated cities Capernaum, Bethsaida, Gadara, Tarichea, and Chorazin, nothing re- mains but shapeless ruins. Some vestiges of Emmaus may still be seen. Cana is a very paltry village. The ruins of Tekoa present only the foundations of some considerable buildings. The city of Nain is now a hamlet. The ruins f.f the ancient Sapphura announce the previous existence of a large city, and its name is still preserved in the appel- lation of a miserable village called Sephoury. Loudd, the ancifnt Lydda and Diospolis, appears like a place lately ravaged by fire and sword, and is one continued heap of rubbish and ruins. Ramla, the ancient Arimathea, is in almost as ruinous a state. Nothing but rubbish is to be found within its boundaries. In the adjacent country there are found at every step dry wells, cisterns fallen in, and rast vaulted reservoirs, which prove that in ancient times mis town must have been upwards of a league and a half in circumference. Caesarea can no longer excite the envy of a conqueror, and has long been abandoned to silent deso- lation. The city of Tiberias is now almost abandoned, and its subsistence precarious; of the towns that bordered on Its lake there are no traces left. Zabulon, once the rival of Tyre and Sidon, is a heap of ruins. A few shapeless stones, unworthy the attention of the traveller, mark the site of the Saffre. The ruins of Jericho, covering no less than a square mile, are surrounded with complete desola- tion ; and there is not a tree of any description, either of palm or balsam, and scarcely any verdure or bushes to be seen about the site of this abandoned city. Bethel is not to be found. The ruins of Sarepta, and of several large cities in its vicinity, are now "mere rubbish, and are only dis- tinguishable as the sites of towns by heaps of dilapidated stones and fragments of columns." But at Djerash, (sup- posed to be the ruins of Gerasa,) are the magnificent re- mains of a splendid city. The form of streets, once lined with a double row of columns, and covered with pavement Still nearly entire, in which are the marks of the chariot- wheels, and on each side of which is an elevated pathway — two theatres and two grand temples, built of marble, and others of inferior note — ^baths — bridges — a cemetery with many sarcophagi, which surrounded the city — a triumphal arch— a large cistern— a picturesque tomb fronted with columns, and an aqueduct overgrown with wood — and up- wards of two hundred and thirty columns still standing amid deserted ruins, without a city to adorn— all combine in presenting to the view of the traveller, in the estimation of those who were successively eyewitnesses of them both, " a much finer mass of ruins" tha!n even that of the boasted Palmyra. But how marvellously are the predictions of their desolation verified, when in general nothing but ruin- ed ruins form the most distinguished remnants of the cities of Israel ; and when the multitude of its towns are aliuost all left, with many a vestige to testify of their number, but without a marl' to tell their name. — Keith. I Ver. 34. Then shall the land enjoy her sabbaths, as long as it lieth desolate, and ye be in your enemies' land ; even then shall the land rest, and enjoy her sabbaths. A single reference to the Mosaic law respecting the Sa]> batical year renders the full purport of this prediction pen fectly intelligible and obvious. " But in the seventh vear shall be a Sabbath of rest unto the land ; thou shalt neither sow thy field nor prune thy vineyard." And the land of Judea hath even thus enjoyed its Sabbaths so long as it hath lain desolate. In that country, where every spot was cultivated like a garden by its patrimonial possessor, where every little hill rejoiced in its abundance, where every steep acclivity was terraced by the labour of man, and where the very rocks were covered thick with mould, and rendered fertile ; even in that selfsame land, with a climate the same, and with a soil unchanged, save only bv neglect, a dire contrast is now, and has for a lengthened, period of time been displayed, by fields untilled and unsown, and by waste and desolated plains. Never since the expatriated descend- ants of Abraham were driven from its borders, has the land of Canaan been so " plenteous in goods," or so abundant in population, as once it was ; never, as it did for ages unto them, has it vindicated to any other people a right to its possession, or its own title of the land of promise — it has rested from century to century ; and while that marked, and stricken, and scattered race, who possess the recorded promise of the God of Israel, as their charter to its final and everlasting possession, still "ic in the land of their ene- mies, so long their land lieth desolate." There may thus al- most be said to be the semblance of a sympathetic feeling between this bereaved country and banished people, as il the land of Israel felt the miseries of its absent children^ awaited their return, and responded to the undying love they bear it by the refusal to yield to other possessors- the rich harvest of those fruits, with which, in the days of their allegiance to the Most High, it abundantly blessed them, And striking and peculiar, without the shadow of even a semblance upon earth, as is this accordance between the fate of Judea and of the Jews, it assimilates as closely, and; may we not add, as miraculously, to those predictions re- specting both, which Moses uttered and recorded ere the: tribes of Israel had ever set a foot in Canaan. The land shall be left of them, and shall enjoy her rest while she lieth desolMe without them. To the desolate state of Judea every traveller bears wit- ness. The prophetic malediction was addressed to the mountains and to the hills, to the rivers and to the valleys; and the beauty of them all has been blighted. Where the inhabitants once dwelt in peace, each under his own vine and under his own fig-tree, the tyranny of the Turks, and the perpetual incursions of the Arabs, the last of a long list of oppressors, have spread one wide field of almost un- mingled desolation. The plain of Esdraelon, naturally most fertile, its soil consisting of "fine rich black mould," level like a lake, except where Mount Ephraim rises in its centre, bounded by Mount Hermon, Carmel, and Mount Tabor, and so extensive as to cover about three hundred square miles, is a solitude " almost entirely deserted ; the country is a complete desert." Even the vale of Sharon is a waste. In the valley of Canaan, formerly a beautiful, delicious, and fertile valley, there is not a mark or vestige of cultivation. The country is continually overrun with rebel tribes ; the Arabs pasture their cattle upon the spon- taneous produce of the rich plains with which it abounds. Every ancient landmark is removed. Law there is none. Lives and property are alike unprotected. The valleys are untilled, the mountains have lost their verdure, the rivers flow through a desert and cheerless land. All the* beauty of Tabor that man could disfigure is defaced ; im- mense ruins on the top of it are now the only remains of a once magnificent city; and Carmel is the habitation of wild beasts. " The art of cultivation," says'Volney, " is in the most deplorable state, and the countryman must sow with the musket in his hand ; and no more is sown than is neces- sary for subsistence." " Everyday I found fields abandoned by the plough." In describing his journey through Galilee, Dr. Clarke remarks, that the earth was covered with sweh a variety of thistles, that a complete collection of them- would be a valuable acquisition to botany. Six new spCi-* Chap. 2—10. NUMBERS. 8* cies of that plant, so significant of wildness, were discovered by himself in a scanty selection. *' From Kane-Leban tcTi Beer, amid the ruins of cities, the country, as far as the eye of the traveller can reach, presents nothing to his view but naked rocks, mountains, and precipices, at the sight of which pilgrims are astonished, balked in their expectations, and almost startled in their faith." " From the centre of the neighbouring elevations (around Jerusalem) is seen a wild, rugged, and mountainous desert ; no herds depasturing on the summit, no forests clothing the acclivities, no waters flowing through the valleys ; but one rude scene of savage melancholy waste, in the midst of which the ancient glory of Judea bows her head in widowed desolation." It is needless to multiply quotations to prove the desolation of a country which the Turks have possessed, and which the Arabs have plundered for ages. Enough has been said to prove that the larid mourns and is laid waste, and has be- come as a desolate wilderness. — Keith. CHAPTER XXVII. Ver. 28. Notwithstanding, no devoted thing that a man shall devote unto the Lord, of all that he hath, both of man and beast, and of the field, of his possession, shall be sold or redeemed : every devoted thing is most holy unto the Lord. Whatever has been devoted to the gods can never be sold, redeemed, or applied to any other purpose. In every village there are chroniclers of strange events, of the visita- tions of the gods on men who did not act fairly and tru'.y with their devoted things. There is a story generally re- ceived of " a deranged man, who in a lucid interval made a vow that he would give his gold beads to the temple ot Siva, and he became quite well. After this he refused to perform his voW, and he died." " Another person, who was very ill of a fever, devoted a goat to the gods, and imme- diately became well ; but some time after he refused the gift, and his fever returned." When a child becomes sick, the parents forthwith inquire, " Have we given all the things we devoted to the gods'?" The medical man also (when the disease baffles his skill) inquires, " Have you given all the things you devoted to the gods T'— Roberts. NUMBERS CHAPTER II. Ver. 31. All they that were numbered in the camp of Dan, were a hundred thousand and fifty and seven thousand and six hundred : they > shall go hindmost with their standards. 34. And the children of Israel did according to all that . the Lord commanded Moses : so they pitched ■ -'J by their standards, and so they set forward, every one after their families; according to the house of their fathers. Mr. Harmer thinks the standards of the tribes were not fiags, but little iron machines carried on the top of a pole, in which fires were lighted to direct their march by night, and so contrived, as sufficiently to distinguish them from pne another. This is the kind of standard by which the Turkish caravans direct their march through the desert to JMecca, and seems to be very commonly used by travellers in the East. Dr. Pococke tells us, that the caravan with which he visited the river Jordan, set-out from thence in the evening soon after it was dark for Jerusalem, being lighted by chips of deal full of turpentine, burning in a round iron frame, fixed to the end of a pole, and arrived at the city a little before daybreak. But he states also, * t^at a short time before this, the pilgrims were called be- fore the governor of the caravan, by means of a white stand- ard that was displayed on an eminence near the camp, in order to enable him to ascertain his fees. In the Mecca caravans, they use nothing by day, but the same moveable >eacons in which they burn "those fires, which distinguish the different tribes in the night. From these circumstances, fiarmer concludes, that, " since travelling in the night must as general be most desirable to a great multitude in that des- jert, and since we may believe that a compassionate God for the most part directed Israel to mov^e in the night, the stand- Urds of the twelve tribes were moveable beacons, like those .of the Mecca pilgrims, rather than flags or any thing of that kind." At night the camp was illuminated by large yood fires ; and a bituminous substance secured in small Gages or beacons, formed of iron hoops, stuck upon poles, threw a brilliant light upon the surrounding objects. — Munroe's Summer Ramble in Syria. 12 CHAPTER V. Ver. 2. Every one that hath an issue, and wh^t soever is defiled by the dead. All who attend a funeral procession, or ceremony, be- come unclean, and before they return to their houses must wash their persons and their clothes. Neither those in the sacred office, nor of any other caste, can, under these cir- cumstances, attend to any religious ceremonies. They can* not marry, nor be present at any festivity, nor touch a sa- cred book. A person on hearing of the death of a son, or other relative, immediately becomes unclean. The Brah- mins are unclean twelve days ; those of the royal family, sixteen days ; the merchants, twenty-two ; and all other castes, thirty-two days. — Roberts. CHAPTER VL Ver. 26. The Lord Jift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace. " As I came along the road, I met Raman, and he lifted up his fa(U:, upon me; but I knew not the end;" which rneans, he looked pleasantly. Does a man complain of another who has ceased to look kindly upon him, he says, " Ah ! my friend, you no longer lift up your countenance upon me." — Roberts. CHAPTER X. Ver. 7. But when the congregation is to be gathered together, ye shall blow, but ye shall not sound an alarrn. The form of the republic established by Moses was demo- cratical. Its head admitted of change as to the name and nature of his office ; and we find that, at certain times, it could subsist without a general head. If, therefore, we would fully understand its constitution, we must begin, not from above, but with the lowest description of persons that had a share in the government. From various passages of the Pentateuch, we find that Moses, at making known- any laws, had to convene the whole congregation of Is- rael, (Snp or mj?;) and, in like manner, in the book of Joshua, we see, that when Diets were held, the whole con* 90 NUMBERS. Chap. 10. gregation were assembled. If on such occasions every in- dividual had had to give his vote, every thing would cer- tainly have been democratic in the highest degree ; but it is scarcely conceivable how, without very particular regu- lations made for the purpose, (which, however, we nowhere find,) order could have been preserved in an assembly of 600,000 men, their ,votes accurately numbered, and acts of violence prevented. If, however, we consider that, while Moses is said to have spoken to the whole congregation^ he could not possibly be heard by 600,000 people, (for what human voice could be sufficiently strong to be so %) all our fears and difhculiies will vanish ; for this circumstance alone must convince any one that Moses-coukl only have addressed himself to a certain number of persons deputed to represent the rest of the Israelites. Accordingly, m Numij. -. IG. we find mention made of such persons. In contradistinction to the common Israelites, they are there denominated Kerm Hiieda, (myn isi^p) that is, " those wont to be called to the convention." In the xvi. chapter of the same book, ver. 2, they are styled, Nes'ie Eda Kerue Aloed, (iy\a>KT>pmy i«>a';) that is, " chiefs of the community, that are called to the convention." I notice this passage par- ticularly, because it appears from it, that 250 persons of this description, who rose up against Moses, became to him objects of extreme terror ; which they could not have been, ifl their voices had not been, at the same time, the voices of their families and tribes. Still more explicit, and to the point, is the passage, Deut. xxix. 9, where Moses, in a speech to the whole people, says, " Ye stand this day all of you before the Lord your God, your heads, your tribes, (thatis, chiefs of tribes,) your elders, your scribes, all Israel, infants, wives, strangers that are in your camp, from the hewer of wood to the drawer of water." Now as Moses could not possibly speak loud enough to be heard by two millions and a half of people, (for to so many did the Israelites amount, women and children included,) it must be manifest that the first-named persons represented the people, to whom they again repeated the word of Moses. Winether these representatives were on every occasion obliged to collect and lee are the sense of their constituents, or whether, like the members of the English House of Commons, they acted in the plenitude of their oWn power for the general good, without taking instructions from their constituents, I find nowhere expressly determined ; but methinks, from a pe- rusal of the Bible, I can scarcely doubt that the latter was the case. "Who these representatives were, may in some measure be understood from Josh, xxiii. 2., and xxiv. 1. They would seem to have been of two sorts. To some, their office as judges gave a right to appear in the assembly ; and these were not necessarily of the same family in which they exercised that office. Others, again, had a seat and a voice in the Diet, as the heads of families. — Michaelis. Ver. 31. And he said. Leave us not, I pray thee ; forasmuch as thou knowest how we are to encamp in the wilderness, and thou mayest be to us instead of eyes. An aged father says to his son, who wishes to go to some other village, "My son, leave me not in my old age; you are now my eyes." " You are on the look-out for me, your eyes are sharp." It is said of a good servant, " he is eyes to his master." — Robert.s. When Moses begged of Hobab not to leave Israel, be- cause they were to encamp in the wilderness, and he might be to them instead of eyes. Numb. x. 31, he doubtless meant that he might be a guide to them in the difficult journeys they had to take in the wilderness: for so Job, when he wou.d express his readiness to bring forward on their journey those that were enfeebled with sickness, or hurt by accidents, and to guide them in their way that were blind or ignorant of it, says, " I was eyes to the blind, and feet was I to the lame," Job xxix. 1.5. Evervbody, accord- ingly, at all acquainted with the nature of such deserts as Israel had to pass through, must be sensible of the great importance of having some of the na'ives of that cormtry for guides: they know where water is to be found, and can lead to places proper, on that account, for encampments. Without their help, travelling would be much more diffi- cult in these deserts, and indeed often fatal. The import- ance of having these Arab guides appears, from such a number of passages in books of travels, that every ono whose reading has at all turned this way, must be apprized of them ; for which reason I shall cite none in particular. The application then of Moses to Hobab the Midianite, that is, to a principal Arab of the tribe of Midian, would have appeared perfectly just, had it not been for this thought, that the cloud of the Divine Presence went before Israel, and directed their marches ; of what consequence then could Hobab's journeying with them hel A man would take more upon himself than he ought to do, that should affi;-m the attendance of such a one as Hobab was of no use to Israel, in their removing from station to station : it is very possible, the guidance of the cloud might not be so minute as absolutely to render his offices of no value. But I will mention another thing, that will put the propriety of this request of Moses quite out of dispute. The sacred history expressly mentions several journeys undertaken by parties of the Israelites, while the main body laid still : so in Numb. xiii. we read of a party that was sent out to reconnoitre the land of Canaan ; in chap. XX. of the messengers sent from Kadesh unto the king of Edom ; in chap. xxxi. of an expedition against the idola- trous Midianites; of some little expeditions, in the close of chap. XXX.; and more journeys of the like kind, were with- out doubt undertaken, which are not particularly recounted. Now Moses, foreseeing something of this, might well beg the company o^ Hobab, not as a single Arab, but as a prince of one of their clans, that he might be able to apply to him from time to time, for some of his people, to be con- ductors to those he should have occasion to send out to different places, while the body of the people, and the cloud of the Lord, continued unmoved. Nor was their assistance only wanted in respect to water, when any party of them was sent out upon some expedi- tion ; but the whole congregation must have had frequent need of them, for directions where to find fuel. Manna continually, and sometimes water, were given them mirac- ulously ; their clothes also were exempted from decay while in the wilderness; but fuel was wanted to warm them some part of the year, at all times to bake and seethe the manna, according to Exod. xvi. 23, and was never ob- tained but in a natural way, that we know of: for this then they wanted assistance of such Arabs as were perfectly acquainted with that desert. So Thevenot, describing his travelling in this very desert, says, on the night of the 25th of January they rested in a place where was some broom, for that their guides never brought them to rest anywhere, willingly we are to suppose, but in places where they could find some fuel, not only to warm them, but to prepare their coffee and mafrouca. He complains also of their resting- place on the night of the 28th of January, on account of their not being able to find any wood there, not so much as to boil coffee. A like complaint he makes of the night between the eighth and ninth of February, Avhen not being able to get into Suez, he was obliged to lie without the gates till it was day, suffering a great deal of cold, because they had no wood to make a fire. Moses hoped Hobab would be instead of eyes to the Israelites, both with respect to the guiding their parties to wells and springs in the desert, and the giving the people in general notice where they might find fuel : for though they frequently make use in this desert of camels' dung for fuel, this could not, we imagine, wholly supply their wants ; and in fact, we find the Israelites sought about for other firing! — Harmer. Ignorance is a kind of blindness often no less fatal than , privation of sight; and partial, or deficient information, is little better than ignorance: so we find Moses saying to Hobab, "Leave' us not, I pray thee; forasmuch as thou knowest how we ought to encamp in the wilderness, and thou mayest be to us instead of eyes," Niimb. x. 31. The necessity and propriety of such a guide, Avill appear from considerations easily gathered from the following '.xtract; and the description of a person of this character will be interesting, though it cannot be equally interestipg to iw who travel on hedge-bounded turnpike roads, as to an indi- vidual about to take his passage across the great desert. If it be sa-d, in the case of Moses, the angel who conducted the camp might have appointed its stations without the as- sistance of Hobab; we answer, it might have been so; but. as it is now the nsral course of Providence to act by means,] even to accomplish the most certain events; and as nO mail who has neglected any mean, has now the smallest right '"^ Chap. U. NUMBERS. 91 expect an interposition of Providence on his tchalf, so we strongly query, whether it would not have been a failing, of presumption, in Moses, had he omitted this application tu Hobab; or indeed, any other, suggested by his good sense and understanding. " " A^ hybeer is a guide, from the Arabic word hubbar, to inform, "instruct, or direct, because they are used to do this oilice to the caravan travelling through the desert, in all its directions, whether to Egypt and back again, the coast of the Red Sea, or the countries of Sudan, and the western extremities of Africi. They are we??- of great considera- !ion, knowing perfectly the situation and properties of all kinds of water, to be met on the route, the distances of wells, whether occupied by enemies or not, and if so, the way to avoid them with the least inconvenience. It is also necessary to them to know the places occupied by the simoom, and the seasons of their blowing in those parts of the desert; likewise those occupied by moving sands. He ^^enerally belongs to some powerful tribe of Arabs inhabit- ing^ these deserts, whose protection he makes use of, to as- sisi his caravans, or protect them in time of danger; and handsome rewards are always in his power to distribute on .such occasions; but now that the Arabs in these deserts are everywhere without government, the trade between Abyssinia and Cairo given over, that between Sudan and the metropolis much diminished, the importance of that oliice o(hybeer, and its consideration, is fallen in proportion, and with these the safe conduct; and we shall see presently a caravan cut off by the treachery of the very hybeers that conducted them, the first instance of the kind that ever hap- pened." (Bruce.) — Taylor in Calmet. CHAPTER XI. ■ Ver. 5. We remember the fish which we did eat in Egypt freely; the cucumbers, and the mel- ons, amd the leeks, and the onions, and the garlic. _To an Englishman the loss of these articles would not ^ive much concern, and he is almost surprised at the Israel- >ites repining at their loss, as at the loss of great delicacies. The people of the East do not in general eat flesh, nor even fish, so that when they can procure it they consider it a delicacy. Cucumbers are eaten in abundance in hot wea- ther, and melons are most delicious and plentiful. I have never seen leeks in the East, and I am doubtful whether they are to be found ; but whether or not, there is much difference of opinion as to the translation of the word. P'Oyly and Mant have a quotation to this effect : — " Whe- ther the following word, rendered leeks, have that significa- tion, may be doubted. Some think it was the lotus, which is a water plant, a kind of water-lily, which the Egyptians used to eat during the heats of summer." In the Universal History, (vol. i. p. 486,) it is said, that those " Egyptians who dwelt in the marshes, fed oil several plants which an- nually grow, particularly the lotus, of which they made a sort of bread." . Of the Arabs also, (in the same work,) it is recorded—" They make a drink of the Egyptian lotus, which is very good for inward heat." The Tamul name of the lotus is the Tamari. The Materia Medica, under the article Nelumbium Speciosum, says this plant is the true lotus of the Egyptians, and the Nymphea Nilufer of Sir William Jones. Its beautiful and fragrant flower is sacred to Lechimy, the goddess of Maga Vishnoo. It has a bulbous root, and is highly esteemed as an article of food. As it grows in tanks, it can only be had in the hottest wea- ther, when the water is dried up; and, in this we see a most gracious provision in allowing it to be taken when most required. Its cooling qualities are celebrated all over India, and the Materia Medica says of it, " This is an ex- cellent root, and is also prescribed medicinally, as cooling and demulcent." The natives eat it boiled, or in curry, or make it into flour for gruels. I am, therefore, of opinion, that it was the lotus of Egypt respecting which the Israel- ites were murmuring. — Roberts. Whoever has tasted onions in Egypt must allow that none can be had bel'er in any part of the universe. Here they are sweet, in other countries they are nauseous and strong; here they are soft, whereas in "the north, and other parts, they are hard of digestion. Hence they cannot in any place be eaten with less prejudice and more satisfaction than in Egypt. They eat them roasted, cut into four pieces, with some bits of roasted meat, which the Turks in Egypt call kobab, and with this dish they are so delighted, that I have heard them wish they might enjoy it in paradise. They likewise make soup of them in Egypt, cutting the onions in small pieces ; this I think one of the best dishes I ever eat. By melons we are probably to understand the water-me- lon, which the Arabians call batech. It is cultivated on the banks of the Nile, in the rich clayey earth which subsides during the inundation. This serves the Egyptians for meat, drink, and physic. It is eaten in abundance during the season, even by the richer sort of people ; but the common people, on whom providence has bestowed nothing but pov- erty and patience, scarcely eat any thing but these, and ac- count this the best time of the year, as they are obliged to put up with worse fare at other seasons. This fruit like- wise serves them for drink, the juice refreshing these poor creatures, and they have less occasion for water than if they were to live on more substantial food in this burning climate. — Hasselquist. Among the different kinds of vegetables, which are ot importance to supply the want of life, or to render it more agreeable, he tells us, is the melo7is, which, without dispute, is there one of the most salutary and common among them. All the species that they have in Europe, and in the sea- ports of the Mediterranean, are to be found in Egypt. Be- sides them, there is one, whose substance is green and very delicious. It grows round like a bowl, and is commonly of an admirable taste. There are also water-melons, ex- tremely good. But above all the rest, at Cairo, and its neighbourhood, they boast of a species of melons, pointed at each end, and swelling out in the middle, which the peo- ple of the country call abdelarins. This is an Arabian word, which signifies the slave of sweetness. In fact, these melons are not to be eaten without sugar, as being insipid without it. Macrisi says, this last kind was formerly trans- ported hither, by a man whose name they bear. They give it to the sick, to whom they refuse all other kinds ol fruit. The rind is very beautifully wrought; its figure very singular ; as well as the manner of ripening it, which is by applying a red-hot iron to one of its extremities. The people of the country eat it green as well as ripe, and in the same manner as we eat apples. These melons, of a foreign extraction, continue two whole months, and grow nowhere else in Egypt. They say the •same species is found in Cyprus.— Maillet. Ver. 6. But now our soul is dried away ; there is nothing at all, besides this manna, before our eyes. In great hunger or thirst the people say, " Our soul is withered." '* More than this, sir, I cannot do ; my spirit is withered within me." " What ! when a man's soul is with- ered, is he not to complain V — Roberts. Ver. 8. And the people went about, and gathered it, and ground it in mills, or beat it in a mor- ■ tar, and baked it in pans, and made cakes of it : and the taste of it was as the taste of fresh oil. The eastern mill consists of two circular stones, about eighteen inches in diameter, and three inches th:' ;k. The top stone has a handle in it, and works round a pivot, which has a hole connected with it to admit the corn. The mor- tar also is much used to make rice flour. It is a block ot wood, about twenty inches high and ten inches in diameter, having a hole scooped out in the centre. The pestle is a stick of about four feet long, made of iron-wood, having an iron hoop fixed to the end. — Roberts. Ver. 16. And the Lord said unto Moses, Gather unto me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom thou knowest to be the elders of the peo- ple, and officers over them; and bring them unto the tabernacle of the congregation, that they may stand there with thee. Moses established in the wilderness another institution, which has been commonly held to be of a judicial nature; 94 NUMBERS. Chap. 12, 13. thousand cities ; and by the testimony of Josephus, seven hundred and fitty myriads of people, without including the inhabitants of Alexandria. From this statement it must be evident, that in order to supply the many thou- sands of Israel with quails for a whole month, no act of creation was necessary ; but only a strong breeze, to direct the flight of those innumerable flocks, which encumber the African continent, to the camp of Israel. We read that our Lord muliiplied the loaves and the fishes, when he fed the attending multitudes ; but no inspired writer insin- uates, that Jehovah created or multiplied the quails with which he sustained his people in the wilderness. He had only to transport them on the wings of the wind, from the vale of Egypt, and the shores of the Red Sea. It was in- deed a stupendous miracle, to collect such immense num- bers, to bring them into the desert precisely at the time which he had appointed, and to let them fall about the camp, that they might be gathered by his people ; but the provision itself existed already in the stores of common providence, and required only "to be conveyed to the spot where it was needed. — Paxton. CHAPTER XII. Ver. 14. And the Lord said unto Moses, If her father had but spit in her face, should she not be ashamed seven days ? Let her be shut out ifrom the camp seven days, and after that let her be received in again. Miriam had greatly offended God, and, therefore, she was to be as a daughter, whose father had spit jn her face. In Deuteronomy xxv. 9, the widow was to spit In the face, of her late husband's brother, if he refused to marry her. And Job (xxx. 10) in his great misery says of his ene- mies, "they spare not to spit in my "face;" and in ref- erence to our Saviour, they did " spit in his face." The most contemptuous, the most exasperating and degrading action, which one man can do to another, is to spit in his face. A person receiving this insult is at once worked up to the highest pitch of anger, and nothing but the rank or power of the individual will prevent him from seeking instant revenge. Indeed, such is the enormity attached to this offence, that it is seldom had recourse to, except in extreme cases. A master, whose slave has deeply offended him, will not beat him, (for that would defile him,) but he spits in his face. When his anger is at the greatest height, he will not even condescend to do that, but order a fellow-servant, or some one near, to spit in his face. Is a person too respectable for this indignity ; then the offended individual will spit upon the ground. Schoolmasters, also, when very angry with a scholar, do not, as in England, be- gin to beat him, but spit in his face, or order some one else to do it. To a person making use of offensive language, bystanders say, " Spit in his face." — Roberts. CHAPTER XIII. Ver. 23. And they came unto the brook of Esh- col, and cut down from thence a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bare it* between two upon a staff: and the^/ brought of the pome- granates, and of the figs. It appears that the cultivation of the vine was never abandoned in this country. The grapes, which are white, and pretty large, are, however, not much superior in size to those of Europe. This peculiarity seems to be confined to those in this neighbourhood, for at the distance of only six miles to the south, is the rivulet and valley called Escohol, celebrated in scripture for its fertility, and for Producing very large grapes. In other parts of Syria, also, have se(^n grapes of such an extraordinary size, that a bunch of them would be a sufficient burdenfor one man. It is not at all surprising, therefore, that when the spies, sent by Moses to reconnoitre the promised land, returned to give him an account of its fertility, it required two of them to carry a bunch qjgrapes, which they brought with them suspended from at^le placed upon their shoulders. (Mariti.) Many eyewitnesses assure us, that in Pales- tine the vines, and bunches of grapes, are almost of an in- credible size. Stephen Schultz relates, " At Beitdjin, a village near Ptolemais, we took our supper under a large vine, the stem of which was nearly a foot and a half in di- ameter, the height about thirty feet, and covered with its branches and shoots (for the shoots must be supported) a hut more than fifty feet long and broad. The bunches ol these grapes are so large that they weigh from ten to tw^elve pounds, and the grapes may be compared to our plums. Such a bunch is cut off and laid on a board, round which they seat themselves, and each helps himself to as many as he pleases." Forster, in his Hebrew Dictionary, (under the word Eshcol,) says, " that he knew at Nurnburg, a monk of the name of Acacius, whohad resided eight years in Palestine, and had also preached at Hebron, where he had seen bunches of grapes which were as much as twc men could conveniently carry." Christopher Neitzschutz, who travelled through Palestine in the year 1634, speaking of his excursions on the Jewish mountains, says, " These mountains are pretty high on the right, and most beautifully situated ; and I can say with truth, that I saM' and ate ol bunches of grapes which were each half an ell long, and the grapes two joints of a finger in length." Reland says, " that a merchant, who lived several years at Rama, as- sured him that he had there seen bunches of grapes which weighed ten pounds each." Vines and grapes ol an extra- ordinary size are found in other parts of the East. Strabo says, " that in the Margiana, a country southwest of the Caspian sea, now called Ghilan, there are vines which two men can scarcely span, the bunches of which are of extra- ordinary length." Olearius, in 1637, saw in this part vines, the stem of w^hich was as thick as a man's body. At Iran, he states, there is a kind of grapes called Enkuri ali deresi, which are of a brown red colour, and as large as Spanish plums. The carrying of a bunch of grapes be- tween two men was not merely for its weight, but that it might be brought uninjured, and without being crushed, into the Israelite camp. — Rosenmuller. The pomegranate, the mains punica of the Romans, the poa or pnia of the Greeks, and the Rimon of the Hebrews, is a kind of apple-tree, whose fruit is covered without, with a rind of a veddish colour, and which, opening lengthwise, shows red grains full of juice resembling wine, with little kernels. The Hebrew term Rimon, which expresses both the tree and the fruit, from Rama, to project, seems to have its name from the strong projection or reflection of light either from the fruit or from the starlike flower with six leaves, or rays, at the top of the apple. The Greek name port, which denotes the tree, and poioKos, the fruit, by which the Seventy render the word Rimon, aim perhaps at the same thing, being derived from pew to flow. We learn from Dr. Shaw, that August produces the first ripe pome- granates, some of which are three or four inches in diam- eter, and of a pound weight. The pomegranate, or malum punicum, as originally brought from Phoenicia, was for- merly numbered among the most delicious fruits which the earth produces. That from Arabia is large, full of juice, and highly flavoured. The juice especially, when express- ed from the seeds and interior film, by which the bitter flavour is avoided, is a delicate beverage : and one of those pomegranates will sometimes fill a small basin. The high estimation in which it was held by the people of Israel, may be inferred from its being one of the three kinds of fruit brought by the spies from Eshcol, to Moses and the congregation in the wilderness ; and from its being spec'- fied by that rebellious people as one of the greatest lu«urie<5 they enjoyed in Egv'pt, the want of which they felt so so- verely in the sandy desert. The pomegranate, classed by Moses with wheat and barley, vines and figs, oil olive and honey, was, in his account, one principal recommendation of the promised land. But no circumstance more clearly proves the value which the Orientals nut upon this fruit, than the choice which Solomon makes of it to represent certain graces of the church : " Thy temples are like a piece of pomegranate within thy locks ;" and in the thirteenth verse, the children of God are compared to an orchard of pome- granates with pleasant fruits. Three sorts of pomegranates are used in Syria, the sour, the sweet, and another of ar. intermediate taste, for the purpose of giving a grateful acid- ity to their sauces or liquids. A very refreshing draught, such as the Syrians use in hot weather, composed of wine mixed with the juice of the pomegranate, it would seem, the spouse proposed to make for her beloved : " I would cause thee to drink of spiced wine of the juice of my pomegrU' Chap. 13—18. NUMBERS, 95 ftate ;" a delicious and cooling beverage to the parched in- habitant of the equatorial regions ; or perhaps she means a species of wine made of pomegranate juice, which we learn from Chardin, is drank in considerable quantities in the East, and particularly in Persia. Which of these is really intended, it is not easy to determine. Liquors of this kind are still very common in the East. Sherbet, which is a syrup, chiefly that of lemons mixed with water, is used by persons of all ranks. "I think," says Mr. Harmer in a note, " it is highly prob- able, that in the time of remote antiquity, pomegranate juice was used in those countries where lemon juice is now used, with their meat, and in their drinks ; and, that it was not till afterward, that lemons came among them. I know not how else to account for the mention of pomegranates, in describing the fruitfulness of the Holy Land : they would not now, I think, occur in such descriptions ; the juice of lemons and oranges have at present almost superseded the use of that of pomegranates." But the opinion of this re- spectable writer, is opposed by no less an authority than Dr. Russel, who spent many years in Syria, and wrote the na- tural history of that country. According to that able his- torian, lemons have by no means superseded the pomegra- nate ; the latter is more easily preserved through the win- ter, and is often in cookery preferred to the lemon. In describing the fruitfulness of a country, the pomegranate would be mentioned ; and it is diligently cultivated even where lemons are plenty. What Chardin calls Roubnar, he would not understand to be wine ; Rab-al-nar is' the in- spissated juice of the pomegranate, or the juice of grapes preserved with sugar, — Paxton. Ver. 32. The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabit- ants thereof. Of a very unhealthy place it is said, " That evil country eats up all the people. " We cannot remain in these parts, the land^s eating us up." " I go to that place ! never ! it will eat me up." Of England it is said, in reference to her victories, " She has eaten up all countries." — Roberts. CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 9. Only rebel not ye against the Lord, neither fear ye the people of the land : for they are bread for us : their defence is departed from them, and the Lord w with us ; fear them not. Hebrew, " shadow." A poor man says of his rich friend, " He is my shadow ;" i. e. he is my defence. " My sha- dow is gone;" meaning, he has lost his defence. "Alas ! those poor people have lost their shadow." — Roberts. Literally, their shadow, a metaphor highly expressive of protection and support in the sultry eastern countries. The Arabs and Persians have the same word to denote the same thing: using these expressions, " May the shadow of thy prosperity be extended." " May the shadow of thy prosperity be spread over the heads of thy well-wishers." "May thy protection never be removed from my head; May God extend thy shadow eternally." At court, when mention is made of the sultan, the appella- tion of alem-peTiah, refuge of the world, is usually added to his title of padisha, or emperor. His loftiest title, and the most esteemed, because given to him by the kings of Per- sia, is zil-ullah, shadow of God. — Burder. CHAPTER XVII. Ver. 6. And Moses spake unto the children of Israel, arid every one of their princes gave him \ a rod apiece, for each prince one, according to their fathers' houses, even twelve rods : and the rod of Aaron was among their rods. 7. And Moses laid up the rods before the Lord in the tabernacle of witness. 8. And it came to pass, that on the morrow Moses virent into the taber- nacle of witness ; and. Heboid, the rod of Aaron, for the house of Levi, was budded, and brought forth buds, and bloomed blossoms, and yielded almonds. See on Jer. 1. 11, 12. CHAPTER XVIII. Ver. 16. And those that are to be redeemed, from a month old shalt thou redeem, according to thine estimation, for the money of five shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary, which is twenty gerahs. According to Leo of Modena, this was performed in the following manner. When the child is thirty days old, the father sends for one of the descendants of Aaron ; several persons being assembled on the occasion, the father brings a cup, containing several pieces of gold and silver coin. The priest then takes the child into his arms, and address- ing himself to the mother, says, " Is this thy son 1" Mo- ther. " Yes." Priest. " Hast thou never had another child, male or female, a mi.scarriage or untimely birth'?" Mo- ther. "No." Priest. "This being the case, this child, as first-born, belongs to me." Then turning to the father, he says, " If it be thy desire to have this child, thou must re- deem it." Father. " I present thee with this gold and sil- ver for this purpose." Priest. " Thou dost wish, therefore, to redeem the child 1" Father. " I do wish so to do." The priest then turning himself to the assembly, says, " Very well: this child, as first-born, is mine, as it is written in Bemidbar, Numb, xviii. 16, 7%ou shalt redeem the first-born of a month old for five shekels; but I shall content myself with this in exchange." He then takes two gold crowns, or thereabouts, and returns the child to his parents. — Burder. Ver. 19. All the heave-offerings of the holy things, which the children of Israel offer unto * theiliORD, have I given thee, and thy sons and thy daughters with thee, by a statute for ever : it is a covenant of salt for ever before the Lord unto thee, and to .thy seed with thee. Among other descriptions of a covenant, there is one which demands explanation. Numb, xviii. 19, " The oflTer- ings I have given to thee, and thy sons and thy daughters with thee, by a statute for ever; it is a covenant of salt, for ever, before the Lord." 2 Chr. xiii. 5, " Ought you not to know that the Lord God of Israel gave the kingdom over Israel to David, for ever, to him, and to his sons, by a covc- 7uint of salt ?" It is very properly, as we suppose, suggested, in answer to the inquiry, What means this covenant of salt 7 that salt preserves from decay and putrefaction; it maintains a firmness and durability. There is a kind of salt so hard, that it is used as money, and passes from hand to hand no more injured than a stone would be, says Mr. Bruce. Salt may therefore very properly be made an em- blem of perpetuity. But the covenant of salt seems to refer to an agreement made, in which salt was used as a token of confirmatif n. We shall give an instance from Baron du Tott. " He, (Moldovanji Pacha,) was desirous of an acquaintance with ■ me, and seeming to regret that his business would not per- mit him to stay long, he departed, promising in a short time to return. I had already attended him half way down the staircase, when stopping, and turning briskly to one of my domestics who followed me, ' Bring me directly,' said he, ' some bread and salt.'' I was not less surprised at this fancy, than at the haste which was made to obey him: What he requested was brought ; when, taking a little salt between his fingers, and putting it with a mysterious air on a bit of bread, he ate it with a devout gravity, assuring me that I might now rely on him. I soon procured an expla- nation of this significant ceremony; but this same man, when become vizier, was tempted to violate this oath thus _ taken in my favour. Yet if this solemn contract be not always religiously observed, it serves, at least, to moderate the spirit of vengeance so natural to the Turks." The Ba- ron adds in a note : " The Turks think it the blackest in- gratitude, to forget the man from whom we have received food : which is signified by the bread and salt in this cere- mony."— (Baron du Tott, part i. page 214.) The Baron alludes to this incident in part iii. page 36. Moldovanji Pacha, being ordered to obey the Baron, was not pleased at it. " I did not imagine I ought to put any great confi- dence in the mysterious covenant of the bread and salt, b]/ which this man had formerly vowed inviolable friendship tu 96 NUMBERS. Chap. 20. me." Yet he " dissembled his discontent," and " his pee- vishness only showed itself in his first letters to the Porte." It will now, we suppose, appear credible, that the phrase " a covenant of salt" alludes to some custom in ancient times; and without meaning to symbolize very deeply, we take the liberty of asking, whether the precept. Lev. ii. 13, " With all thine oiferings thou shalt ofier salt," may have any ref- erence to ideas of a similar nature 1 Did the custom of feasting at a covenant-making include the same 1 accord- ing to the sentiment of the Turks hinted at in the Baron's note. We ought to notice the readiness of the Baron's do- mestics, in proof that they, knowing the usages of their country, well understood what was aboui to take place. Also, that this covenant is nsuallij punctually observed, and where it is not punctually observed, yet it has a re- straining influence on the party who has made it ; and his non-observance of it disgraces him. We proceed to give a remarkable instance of the power of this covenant of salt over the mind : it seems to imply a something attributed to salt, which it is very difficult for us completely to explain, but which is not the less real on that account : " Jacoub ben Lairh, the founder of a dynasty of Persian princes called the Saftarides, rising, like many others of the ancestors of the princes of the East, from a very low state to royal power, being in his first setting out in the use of arms, no better than a freebooter or robber, is yet said to have maintained some regard to decency in his depredations, and never to. have entirely stripped those that he robbed, always leaving them something to soften their affliction. Among other exploits that are recorded of him, he is said to have broken into the palace of the prince of that country, and having collected a very large booty, which he was on the point of carrying away, he found his foot kicked something which made hmi stumble ; he imagined it might be something of value, and putting it to his mouth, the belter to distinguish what it was, his tongue soon informed him it was a himp of salt. Upon this, according to the morality, or rather superstition, of the country, where the people considered salt as a symbol and pledge of hosplMity, he was so touched, that he left all his booty, retiring without taking away any thing with him. The" next morning, the risk they had run of losing many valuable things being perceived, great was the surprise, and strict the inquiry, what could be the occasion of their being left. At length Jacoub was found to be the person concerned ; who having given an account, very sincerely, of the whole transaction to the prince, he gained his es- teem so effectually, that it might be said, with truth, that it was his regard for salt that laid the foundation of his after fortune. The prince employing him as a man of courage and genius in many enterprises, and finding him successful in all of them, he raised him, by little and little, to the chief posts among his troops; so that, at that prince's death, he found himself possessed of the command in chief, and had such interest in their affections, that they pre- ferred his interests to those of the children of the deceased prince, and he became absolute master of that province, from whence he afterward spread his conquests far and wide."— (D'Herbelot, Bibl. Orient, p. 466. Also, Harmer's Obs.) — Taylor in Calmet. CHAPTER XX. Ver. 19. And the children of Israel said unto him, We will go by the highway ; and if I and my cattle drink of thy water, then I will pay for it : I will only (without doing any thing else) go through on my feet. The scarcity of water, and the great labour and expense cf digging away so much earth, in order to reach it, ren- der a well extremely valuable. As the water is often sold at a very high price, a number of good wells yield to the proprietor a large revenue. Pitts was obliged to purchase water at sixpence a gallon; a fact which illustrates the force of the offer made by Moses to Edom ; " If I, and my cattle, drink of thy water, then will I pay for it." It is prop- erly mentioned as a very aggravating circumstance in the overthrow of Jerusalem, that the. ruthless conqueror forced the Jews to purchase with money, the water of their own wells and the wood of their own trees: "We have drunken our water for money; our wood is sold unto us." Even a cup of cold water cannot always be obtained in Syria, without paying a certain price. It is partly on this account our Lord promises, "Whosoever shall give to drink unto one of those little ones, a cup of cold water, in the name of a disciple, should in no wise lose his reward " — Paxton. How little do the people of England understand /eeZm^Zjf those passages of scripture which speak of want of water, oi paying for that necessary fluid, and of the strife for such a valuable article as a well ! So we read, " Abraham re- proved Abimelech, because of a well of water, which Abimelech's servants had violently taken away." Gen. xxi. 25. So, chap. xxvi. 20 : " The herdsmen of Gerar did strive with Isaac's herdsmen ; and he called the well Esekf contention." — To what extremities contention about a sup- ply of water may proceed, we learn from the following ex- tracts : — " Our course lay along shore, betwixt the main- land and a chain of little islands, with which, as likewise with rocks and shoals, the sea abounds in this part; and for that reason, it is the practice with all these vessels to anchor every evening : we generally brought up close to the shore, and the land-breeze springing up about midnight, w^afted to us the perfumes of Arabia, with which it was strongly impregnated, and very fragrant ; the latter part ot it carried us off in the morning, and continued till eight, when it generally fell calm for two or three hours, and after that the northerly wind set in, after obliging us to anchor under the lee of the land by noon ; it happened that one morning, when we had been driven by stress of weather into a small bay, called Birk Bay, the country around it being inhabited by the Budoes, [Bedow^eens] the Noquedah sent his people on shore to get water, for which it is always customary to pay." Tliis extract, especially illustrates the passage, Num. xx. 17, 19; — " We will not drink of the water of the wells : — if I, and my cattle, drink of thy water, then will I pay for it." — This is always expected ; and though Edom might in friendship have let his brother Israel drink gratis, had he recollected their consanguinity, yet Israel did not insist on such accommodation. How strange would it sound in England, if a person in travelling, should propose to pay for drinking water from the wells by the road-side ! Never- theless, still stronger is the expression. Lam. v. 4 ; " We have drank our own water for money ;" we bought it of our foreign rulers ; although we were the natural proprietors of the wells which furnished it. — Taylor in Calmet. Ver. 22. And the children of Israel, et'en the whole congregation, journeyed from Kadesh, and came unto mount Hor, 23. And the Lord spake unto Moses and Aaron in mount Hor, by the coast of the land of Edom, saying, 24. Aaron shall be gathered unto his people : for he shall not enter into the land which I have given unto the children of Israel, because ye rebelled against my word at the water of Meribah. 25. Take Aaron and Eleazar his son, and bring them up unto mount Hor : 26. And strip Aaron of his garments, and put them upon Eleazar his son ; and Aaron shall be gathered VMto his people, and shall die there. 27. And Moses did as the Lord commanded : and they went up into mount Hor in the sight of all the congregation. 28. And Mose* stripped Aaron of his garments, and put them upon Eleazar his son ; and Aaron died there in the top of the mount: and Moses and Eleazar came down from the mount. The evidence already adduced leaves unquestionable the possibility that excavations in rocks may continue unim- paired for many ages. That monuments so extremely an- cient as the days of Moses and Aaron should still bear their testimony to facts of other times, is too wonderful to be received without due circumspection. — If they were re- ferred to buildings, to structures erected by human power, they would be something more than dubious : but this ^. Chap. 21. NUMBERS. 97 hesitation does not apply to chambers cut in rocks, or on the sides of rocky mouniains : it' the identity of such places can be established, their antiquity need occasion no difficul- ty ; if the tomb of Aaron be not the tomb of any other per- son, it may be admitted to all the honours of the distant age to which it is ascribed. The rock and the mountain origi- nated with the world, and will endure to the end of time. At least, it is proper that what is said of the tomb of Aaron, ' should find its place in a work like the present. Our travellers left Petra, and taking a south-westerly direction, arrived at the foot of Mount Hor, by three o'clock in the afternoon. They climbed the rugged ascent, and found "a crippled Arab hermit, about eighty years of age, the one half of which time he had spent on the top of the mountain, living on the donations of the few Mohammedan pilgrims who resort thither, and the charity of the native shepherds, who supply him with water and milk. He con- ducted us into the small white building, crowned by a cupola, that contains the tomb of Aaron. The monument is of stone, about three feet high, and the venerable Arab, having lighted a lamp, led us down some steps to a chamber below, hewn out of the rock, but containing nothing ex- traordinary. Against the walls of the upper apartment, where stood the lomb, were suspended beads, bits of cloth and leather, votive offerings left by the devotees ; on one side, let into the wall, we were shown a dark looking stone, that was reputed to possess considerable virtues in the cure of diseases, and to have formerly served as a seat to the prophet." — Taylor in Calmet. CHAPTER XXI. Ver. 6. And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people : and much people of Israel died. The seraph, to a biblical student, is one of the most inter- esting creatures that has yet fallen under our notice. It bears the name of an order among the hosts of heaven, whom Isaiah beheld in vision, placed above the throne of Jehovah in the temple ; the brazen figure of this serpent, is supposed to be a type of our blessed Redeemer, who was for our salvation lifted up upon the cross, as the serpent was elevated in the camp of Israel, for the preservation of that people. It is the only species of serpent which the al- mighty Creator has provided with wings, by means of which, instead of creeping or leaping, it rises from the ground, and, leaning upon the extremity of its tail, moves wi|h great velocity. It is a native of Egypt, and the des- ert's of Arabia ; and receives its name from the Hebrew verb saraph, which signifies to burn, in allusion to the vio- lent inflammation which its poison produces, or rather its fiery colour, wbich the brazen serpent was intended to rep- resent. Bochart is of opinion, that the seraph is the same as the hydrus, or, as Cicero calls it, the serpent of the wa- ters. For, in the book of Isaiah, the land of Egypt is call- ed the region from whence come the viper and flying ser- aph, or burning serpent, ^lian says, they come from the deserts of Libya and Arabia, to inhabit the streams of the Nile ; and that they have the form of the hydrus. The existence of winged serpents is attested by many writers of modern times. A kind of snakes were discover- ed among the Pyrenees, from whose sides proceeded carti- lages in the form of wings ; and Scaliger mentions a peas- ant who killed a serpent of the same species which attack- ed him, and presented it to the king of France. Le Blanc, as quoted by Bochart, says, at the head of the lake Chia- may, are extensive wooj^s and vast marshes, which it is very dangerous to approach, because they are infested by very large serpents, which, raised from the ground on wings re- sembling those of bats, and leaning on the extremity of their tails, move with great rapidity. They exist, it is" re- ported, about these places in so great numbers, that they have almost laid waste the neighbouring province. And, in the same work, Le Blanc affirms that he has seen some of them of immense size, which, when hungry, rushed im- petuously on sheep and other tame animals. But the origi- nal term ri3i!;r! Moopheph, does not always signify flying with wings ; it often expresses vibration, swinging back- ward and forward, a tremulous motion, a fluttering; and this is precisely the motion of a serpent, when he springs from one tree to another. Niebuhr mentions a sort of ser- pents at Bassorah, which they call Heie thiare. " Thev 13 ' commonly keep upon the date trees ; and as it would be la- borious for them to come down from a very high tree, in order to ascend another, they twist themselves by the tail to a branch of the former, which making a spring by the motion they give it, throws them to the branches of the sec- ond. Hence it is, that the modern Arabs call them fly- ing serpents, Heie thiare. Admiral Anson also speaks of the flying serpents, that he met with at the island of Cluibo ; but, which were without wings." From this account it may be inferred, that the flying serpent mentioned in the prophet, was of that species of serpents which, from their swift darting motion, the Greeks c?i\\ Acontias, and the Ro- mans, Jacuius. The seraph is classed by the Hebrews, among those animals which emit an offensive odour ; which corresponds with the character given of the hydrus by the poet: '• graviter spirantibus hydris." This circum- stance is confirmed by ^lian, who states, that in Corcvra, the hydras turn upon their pursuers, and exhale from their lungs an air so noisome, that they are compelled to desist from the attack. It is an obvious objection to these- argu- ments, that the hydrse are produced, and reared in marshy places ; not in burning and thirsty deserts, where the peo- ple of Israel murmured because they could find no water. But, although that people might find no water to drink, it will not follow, that the desert contained no marshy place, or muddy pool, where the hydrse might lurk. Besides, it is well known, that when water fails, these serpents do not perish, but become chersydri, that is, seraphim or burners, ^lian says they live a long time in the parched wilder- ness, and lie in wait for all kinds of animals. These cher- sydri, it is extremely probable, were the serpents which bit the rebellious Israelites : and in this state they were more terrible instruments of divine vengeance ; for, exasperated by the want of water, and the intense heat of the season, they injected a deadlier poison, and occasioned to the mis- erable sufferer more agonizing torments. The time of the year when Jehovah sent these serpents among his people, proves that this is no vain conjecture. According to Ni- cander, the hydrae become chersydri, and beset the path of the traveller about the dog days. Now, Aaron died on the first day of the fifth month, that is, the month Abib, which corresponds with the nineteenth day of July. The Israelites mourned for him thirty days ; immediately after which, they fought a baUle with Arad, the Canaanite, and destroy- ed his country : then recommencing their journey, they murmured for want of water, and the serpents were sent. This, then, must have happened about the end of August; the season when the hydras become seraphim, and inflict the most cruel wounds. Nor is it a fact, that the frightful solitudes which Israel traversed, were totally destitute of water; for, in their fourth journey they came to the river Arnon ; in the fifth, to Beer, a well greatly celebrated in scripture; and soon after the death of Aaron, they arrived at a region watered by numerous streams. In these irrig- uous places, which were at no great distance from the camp of Israel, the hydrse might be produced, and sent to chastise the rebellious tribes. The words of Moses also seem to countenance the idea, that the hydrse employed on this occasion, were not generated on the spot, but sent Irom a distance: "And the Lord sent fiery serpents, or sera- phim, among the people." From these words it is natural to conclude, that they came from that "land of rivers," through which the congregation had lately passed. Nor will this be reckoned too long a journey, when it is recol- lected that they travelled from both the Libyan and Arafcian deSerts, to the streams of the Nile. They inflicted on this memorable occasion, an appropriate chastisement on the perverse tribes. That rebellious people had opened their mouth against the heavens; they had sharpened their tongues like serpents; and the poison of asps was under their lips : therefore they were made to suffer, by the burn- ing poison of a creature which they so nearly resembled. — Paxton. Ver. 18. The princes dig-ged the well, the nobles of the people digged it, by the direction of the lawgiver, with their staves. And from the wilderness they went to Mattanah. Michaelis observes on this passage, that Moses seems to have promised the Israelites that they would discover in this neighbourhood, and that by ordinary human industry ^8 NUMBERS. Chap. 22—24. and skill, a spring hitherto unknown ; and that this promise was fulfilled. The discovery of springs, which olten flow at a considerable depth below the surface of the earth, is of great importance to a country so poor in water as Arabia. Often a spot that is dry above'has even subterraneous lakes, to reach which it is necessary to dig to some depth. We have a remarkable instance in a part of Africa which Shaw describes at the end of the eighth chapter of his geographi- cal remarks on Algiers:—" The villages of Wadreag are supplied in a particular manner with water: they have, properly speaking, neither fountains nor rivulets ; but by digging wells to the depth of a hundred, and sometimes two hundred fathoms, they never want a plentiful stream. In order, therefore, to obtain it, they dig through different layers of sand and gravel till they come to a flaky stone, like slate, which is known to lie immediately above the bahar iaht el erd, or the sea below the ground, as they call the abyss. This is easily broken through, and the flux of wa- ter, which follows the stroke, rises generally so suddenly, and in such abundance, that the person let down for this purpose has sometimes, though raised up with the greatest dexterity, been overtaken and suffocated by it." In some parts of Arabia, as at Faranard in the valley of Dsch iron- del, water is found, according to Niebuhr, on digging only a foot and a half deep. — Rosenmuller. CHAPTER XXIL Ver. 4. And Moab said unto the elders of Midian, Now shall this company lick up all that are round about us, as the ox licketh up the grass of the field. A native gentleman, who has many people depending upon him, says, " Yes, they are all grazing upon me." " If I am not careful, they will soon graze up all I have." Of people who have got all they can out of one rich man, and who are seeking after another, " Yes, yes, they have done grazing there, and are now looking out for another place." " These bulls are grazing in every direction." — Roberts. Ver. 6. Come now therefore, I pray thee, curse me this people ; for they are too mighty for me: perad venture I shall prevail, that we may smite them, and that I may drive them out of the land : for I wot that he whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed. The Orientals, in their wars, have always their magi- cians with them to curse their enemies, and to mutter in- cantations for their destruction. Sometimes they secretly convey a potent charm among the opposing troops, to cause their destruction. In our late war with the Burmese, the generals had several magicians, who were much en- gaged in cursing our troops; but, as they did not succeed, a number of witches were brought for the same purpose. — Roberts. Ver. 21. And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ass, and went with the princes of Moab. We learn from Niebuhr, that in Egypt the asses are very handsome, and are used for riding by the greater part of the Mohammedans, and by the most distinguished women of that country. The same variety serves for the saddle m Persia and Arabia ; and must therefore have been com- mon in Palestine. They are descended from tamed ona- pers, which are taken young, and sold for a high price to the nobles of Persia, and the adjacent countries, for their studs. They cost seventy-five ducats; and Tavernier s^ays, that fine ones are sold in Persia dearer than horses, even to a hundred crowns each. He distinguishes them properly from the baser race of ordinary asses, which are employed in carrying loads. These saddle asses, the issue of onagers, are highly commended by all travellers into the Levant. Like" the wild ass, they are extremely swift ftnd rapid in their course ; of a slender form, and animated i'ait. They have vigorous faculties, and can discern ob- slacles readily ; at the sight of danger they emit a kind of cry ; they are obstinate to excess, when beaten behind^ or when they are put out of their way, or when attempts are made to control them against their will : they are also familiar and attached to their master. These particulars exactly correspond with several incidents in the history of Balaam's ass; from whence it may be inferred, that he rode one of the superior breed, and by consequence, was a person of considerable wealth and eminence in his own country. The high value which people of rank and fashion in the East set upon that noble race of asses, excludes them from the purchase of the commonalty, and restricts the possession of them to the great, or the affluent. This fact is confirmed by the manner in which the sacred writers express themselves on this subject. — Paxton. CHAPTER XXIII. Ver. 21. The Lord his God is with him, and the shout of a king is among them. When people pass along the road, if they hear a great noise of joy or triumph, they say, " This is like the shout of a king." " What a noise there was in your village last evening ! why, it was like the shout of a king." — Roberts. CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 6. As the valleys are they spread forth, as gardens by the river's side; as the trees of lign-aloes which the Lord hath planted, and as cedar-trees beside the waters. Gabriel Sionita, a learned Syrian Maronite, thus describes the cedars of Mount Lebanon, which he had examined on the spot. " The cedar-tree grows on the most elevated part of the mountain ; is taller than the pine, and so thick, that five men together could scarce fathom one. It shoots out its branches at ten or twelve feet from the ground; they are large, and distant from each other, and are perpetually green. The cedar distils a kind of gum, to which different effects are attributed. The wood of it is of a brown colour, very solid, and incorruptible if preserved from wet ; it bears a small apple, like that of the pine. De la Roque re- lates some curious particulars concerning this tree, which he learned from the Maronites of Mount Libanus : " The branches grow in parallel rows round the tree, but lessen gradually from the bottom to the top, shooting out parallel to the horizon, so that the tree is, in appearance, similar to a cone. As the snows, which fall in vast quantities on this mountain, must necessarily, by their weight on such a vast surface, break down these branches, nature, or rather the God of nature, has so ordered it, that at the approach of winter, and during the snowy season, the branches erect themselves, and cling close to the body of the tree, and thus Srevent any body of snow from lodging on them." Maun- rell, who visited Mount Libanus in 1697, gives the follow- ing description of the cedars still growing there : " These noble trees grow among the snow, near the highest part of Lebanon, and are remarkable, as well for their own age and largeness, as for those frequent allusions to them in the word of God. Some of them are very old, and of a prodigious bulk ; others younger, and of a smaller size. Of the former I could reckon only sixteen, but the latter are very numerous. I measured one of the largest, and found it twelve yards and six inches in girth, and yet sound ; and thirty-seven yards in the spread of its branches. At about five or six yards from the ground it was divided into five limbs, each of which was equal to a great tree." The aloe-tree here meant is the aloe which grows in the East Indies, to the height of eight or ten feet, and (not to be confounded with the aloe-plant originally from Amer- ica) its stem is the thickness of a thigh. At the top grow.s a tuft of jagged and thick leaves, which is broad at the bottom, but becomes gradually narrower towards the point, and is about four feet long; the blossom is red, intermingled with yellow, and double like cloves. From this blossom comes a red and white fruit, of the size of a pea. This tree has a very beautiful appearance, and the wood has ?o fine a smell, that it is used for perfume. The Indians con- sider this tree as sacred, and are used to fell it with various religious ceremonies. The Orientals consider this aloe as a tree of Paradise, on which account the Dutch call it the tree of Paradise. Therefore, Rabbi Solomon Jarctti Chap. 31 -^35. NUMBERS. 99 explains the Hebrew word as ' myrrh and sanderswood, which God planted in the garden of Eden." — Rosenmuller. CHAPTER XXXI. Ver. 50. We have therefore brought an oblation for the Lord, what every man hath gotten, of jewels of gold, chains, and bracelets, rings, ear-rings, and tablets, to make an atonement for our souls before the Lord. There is not a man in a thousand who does not wear an ear-ring or a finger-ring, for without such an ornament a J;person would be classed among the most unfortunate of jlnis race. Some time ago a large sacrifice was made for the purpose of removing the cholera morbus, when vast numbers came together with their oblations. The people seemed to take the greatest pleasure in presenting their ear- rinses, finger-rins:s, bracelets, and other ornaments, because they were dearer to them than money, and consequently were believed to be more efficacious in appeasing the gods. When people are sick, they vow to give a valuable jewel to their god on being restored. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXXII. Ver. 55. Then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell. People in the East, in consequence of their light clothing, of the exposed state of their feet, and the narrowness of the paths, have a great dread of thorns. Those who carry the alankeen, or who travel in groups, often cry aloud, MuUu, nllul A thorn, a thorn ! The sufferer soon throw^s him- If on the earth, and some one, famous for his skill, ex- tracts the thorn. Does a person see something of a distress- ing nature, he says, " That was a thorn in my eyes." A father says of his bad son, " He is to me as a thorn." " His vile expressions were like thorns in my body." A person going to live in an unhealthy place, or where there are quarrelsome people, is said to be going " to the thorny des- ert." — Roberts. CHAPTER XXXV. Ver. 19. The revenger of blood himself shall slay the murderer : when he meeteth him he shall slay him. fc The interest of the common safety has for ages estab- fehed a law among the Arabians, which decrees that the Tblood of every man who is slain must be avenged by that of his murderer. This vengeance is called tar, or retalia- tion, and the right of exacting it devolves on the nearest a-kin to the deceased. So nice are the Arabs on this point of honour, that if one neglects to seek his retaliation, he is disgraced for ever. He therefore watches every opportu- nity of revenge ; if his enemy perish from any other cause, •^till he is not satisfied, and his vengeance is directed against the nearest relation. These animosities are transmitted as an inheritance from father to children, and never cease but by the extinction of one of the families: unless they agree to sacrifice the criminal, or purchase the blood for a stated price in money or in fiocks. Without this satisfaction, there is neither peace, nor truce, nor alliance between them, nor sometimes even between whole tribes. There Is blood between us, say they, on every occasion ; and this ^-Ypression is an insurmountable barrier. — Volney. " Among the Bedouin Arabs," says D'Arvieux, " the re- venge of blood is implacable. If one man has killed an- other, the friendship between the two families and their descendants is dissolved. If an opportunity should occur to join in some common interest, or if one family propose a marriage to the other, they answer quite coolly, * You know that there is blood between us, we cannot accept your proposal, and must consider our honour.' They do not forgive each other till they have had their revenge, with which, however, they are not m haste, but wait for time and opportunity." This is confirmed by Niebuhr, Descrip- tion of Arabia. " The Arabs seldom wish to see the mur- derer put to death by the magistrates, or take his life them- selves, because they would deliver his family from a bad mernber, and, consequently, from a great burden. The family of the person murdered generally reserve to them- selves the right to declare war, as it were, against the murderer and his relations. But an honourable Arab must observe some equality of strength ; it would be con- sidered disgraceful if a strong person should attack one old or sick, or many, a single individual. They are, how- ever, permitted to kill even the most distinguished, and, as it were, the support of the family : for they require that he in particular, who is considered as the chief, and who acknowledges himself as such, should have a watchful eye on the conduct of all the members. The murderer is, however, arrested by the magistrates, and released again, after paying a certain sum, for instance, two hundred dol- lars. This is, probably, the reason why the law is not abolished. After this, every member of both families must live in constant fear of anywhere meeting his enemy, till at length one of the family of the murderer is killed. There have been instances that similar family feuds have lasted fifty years, or more, because they do not challenge each other to single combat, but fight only when opportu- nity offers. A man of consequence at Loheia, who used to visit us frequently, besides the usual Arabian weapon, that is, a broad and sharp-pointed knife, always carried a small lance, which he hardly ever put out of his hands, even in the company of his friends. As we were not ac- customed to see such a weapon in the hands of the other Arabs, and inquired about it, he complained that some years before he had had the misfortune to have one of his family killed. The injured family had then reserved to revenge themselves in single combat, of the murderer or his relations. One of his enemies, and the very one whom he principally feared, was also in this town. He once met him m our house also, armed with a lance. They might have terminated their quarrel immediately, but they did not speak one word to each other, and much less diit any combat ensue. Our friend assured us, that if he should meet his enemy in the open country, he must necessarily fight him ; but he owned at the same time,' that he strove to avoid this opportunity, and that he could not sleep in peace for fear of being surprised." After the bombardment of Mocha by the French, and when peace was already concluded, the captain of a French ship was stabbed before his own door, where he sat asleep, by an Arab soldier, one of whose relations had been killed by a bomb. — Rdsen- MULLER. I must now speak of a person quite unknown in our law, but very conspicuous in tne Hebrew law, and in regard to whom Moses has left us, I might almost say, an inimitable, but, at any rate, an unexampled proof of legislative wisdom. In German, we may call him by the name which Luther so happily employs, in his version of the Bible, Der Blut- rdcher, the blood-avenger ; and by this name we must here understand " the nearest relation of a person mur- dered, Avhose right and duty it was to seek after and kill the murderer with his own hand ; so much so, indeed, that the neglect thereof drew after it the greatest possible infa- my, and subjected the man who avenged not the death of his relation, to unceasing reproaches of cowardice or avarice." If, instead of this description, the reader pre- fers a short definition, it may be to this effect; "the nearest relation of a person murdered, whose right and duty it war? to avenge the kinsman's death with his own hand." Among the Hebrews, this person was called Sk), GoU, according, at least, to the pronunciation adopted from the pointed Bibles. The etymology of this word, like most forensic terms, is as yet unknown. Yet we cannot bu^ be curious to find out whence the Hebrews had derived the name, which they applied to a person so peculiar to their own law, and so totally unknown to ours. Unquestionably the verb bm, Gaal, means to bicy off, ransom, redeem ; but th is signification it has derived from the noun ; for original Iv it meant to pollute, or stain. If I might here mention a conjecture of my own, Goel of blood, (for that is the term at full length,) implies blood-stained ; and the nearest kin^^^ man of a murdered person was considered as stained wit'" his blood, until he had. as it were, washed away the sta*- - and revenged the death of his relation. The name, thej- fore, indicated a person who continued in a state of dl" honour, until he again rendered himself honourable, bj 100 NUMBERS. Chap. the exercise and accomplishment of revenge ; and in this very light do the Arabs regard the kinsman of a person murdered. It was no doubt afterward used in a more ex- tensive sense, to signify the nearest relation in general, and although there was no murder in the case ; just as in all languages, words are gradually extended far beyond their etymological meaning. Etymology may show the circum- stances from which they may have received their signifi- cation ; but it is by no means a definition suited to all their derivative meanings, else would it be prophetic. In Arabic, this personage is called Tair, or according to another pro- nunciation, Thsair. Were this Arabic word to be written Hebraically, it would be ^av, {Shaer) that is, the survivor. It appears, therefore, according to its derivation, to be equivalent to the surviving relation, who teas bound to avenge the death of a murdered person. The Latin word, Superstes, expresses this idea exactly. In Arabic writings, this word occurs ten times for once that we meet with Goel in He- brew ; for the Arabs, among whom the point of honour and heroic celebrity, consists entirely in the revenge of blood, have much more to say of their blood-avenger than the Hebrews ; among whom, Moses, by the wisdom of his laws, brought this character in a great measure into obliv- ion. The Syrians have no proper name for the blood- avenger, and are of course obliged to make use of a circumlocution, when he is mentioned in the Bible. Hence they must either not have been acquainted with the office itself, or have lost their knowledge of it at an early period, during their long subjection to the Greeks, after the time of Alexander the Great. If this character, with which the Hebrews and Arabs were so well acquainted, be unknown to us, this great dis- similarity is probably not to be ascribed to the effects of difference of climate, but rather to the great antiquity of these nations. Nations, how remote soever in their situa- tion, yet resemble each other while in their infancy, much in the same way as children in every country have certain resemblances in figure and manners, proceeding from their age, by which we can distinguish them from adults and old people ; and of this infancy of mankind, or, to speak more properly, of that state of nature, whence they soon pass into the state of civil society, the blood-avenger seems to me to be a relic. Let us figure to ourselves a people without magistrates, and where every father of a family is still his own master. In such a state, men's lives would of necessity be in the highest degree insecure, were there no such blood-avenger as we have above described. Ma- gistrate, or public judicial tribunal, to punish murder, there is none ; of course acts of murder might be daily perpe- trated, were there no reason to dread punishment of ano- ther description. For their own security, the people would be forced to constitute the avengement of blood an indis- pensable duty, and not only to consider a murderer as an outlaw, but actually to endeavour to put him to death, and whithersoever he might flee, never to cease pursuing him, until h^ became the victim of vengeance. As, however, every one would not choose to undertake the dangerous of- fice of thus avenging a murder, the nearest relations of the unfortunate sufi"erer would find it necessary to undertake it themselves. It would naturally be deemed a noble deed, and the neglect of it, of course, highly disgraceful, and just- ly productive of such infamy and reproach as blood alone could wash away. Nor would any one obstruct, but rather aid them, in the prosecution of their revenge, if he had a proper regard to his own security. Allowing, however, that the murderer's relations were to protect him against the blood-avenger, or to revenge his death by a fresh murder in their turn, this would still be a proof that they regarded such revenge as an honourable duty, and that they would liave looked upon the family of the murdered person as despicable cowards, if they had left his death unrevenged. And this is in fact the language of nature among nations who have not even the most remote connexion with the Hebrews and Arabs. I remember to have read somewhere in Labat's Voyages, that the Caraibs practise the same sort of revenge, and that it gives rise to family contests of long tluration, because the friends of the murderer take his pirt, and revenge his death on the relatives of the first vic- tim. We can scarcely conceive the human race in a more perfect state of nature than immediately after the deluge, when only Noah and bis three sons were on the face of the carih. Each of them was independent of the other ; the father was too old to be able to enforce obedience, had s.v.y of them been refractory ; and besides, a fether is not expect- ed to inflict capital nunishment on his sons or grandsons. Add to this, that Noah's sons and their families were not to continue all together, and to form one commonwealih, but to spread themselves in perfect independence over the whole earth. In order, therefore, to secure their lives, Gud himself gave this command, Gen. ix. 5, 6: " Man's blood shall not remain unrevenged ; but whoever killeth a moji, be it man or beast, shall in his turn be put to death by other men." If the reader wishes to know more of this passage, which has been generall)'' misunderstood, and held out as containing a precept still obligatory on magistrates, let hint consult my Covimentationes ad leges divinas dc peena Hovii- cidii, in Part I. of my Syntagma Commentationum. Here, the only difference from the law now under consideration is, that God imposes this duty, not upon the nearest relation, but on mankind in general, as bound to provide for their common security, and that he gives every individual a right to put a murderer to death, although we hav^e no connex- ion with the person murdered — a law which remained in force, until mankind introduced civil relations, made laA\ s, nominated magistrates, and thus established a better secu- rity to the lives as well as the property of individuals. — MiCHAELIS. Ver. 25. And the congregation shall deliver thei slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood, ! and the congregation shall restore him to thei city of his refuge, whither he was fled : and hei shall abide in it unto the death of the high-i priest, which was anointed with the holy oil. | Moses found the Goel already instituted, and speaks of; him in his laws as a character perfectly known, and there-' fore unnecessary to be described ; at the same time that lie, expresses his fear of his frequently shedding innocent blood. But long before he has occasion to mention him as: the avenger of murder, he introduces his name in his laws relating to land, as in Lev. xxv. 25, 2G, where he gives bini| the right of redeeming a mortgaged field ; and also in thei law relative to the restoration of any thing iniquitouslyj acquired. Num. v. 8. The only book that is possibly more! ancient than the Mosaic law, namely, the book of J()b,| compares God, who will re-demand our ashes from the earth, with the Goel, chap. xix. 25. From this term, thC; verb h*-n. For he says, God will, for the man who has unintentionally killed another, appoint a place to which he may flee, Exod. xxi. 12, 13. There must, of course, have been some one who pursued him, and who could only be stopped by the unhappy man reaching his asylum. At any rate, he need- ed not to flee from justice ; and it was quite enough if the magistrate acquitted him, after finding him innocent. The first passage in which Moses expressly speaks of the Goel, as the avenger of blood, is in the xxxvth chapter of Num- bers : but even there he certainly does not institute his office, but only appoints (and that too merely by-tbe-by, while he is fixing the inheritances of the Levites^ certain cities of refuge, to serve as asyla from the pursuit of the blood-avenger, (ver. 12,) for which there was no necessity, had there been no such person. In the second statute, Deut. xix. 6, he manifests great anxiety lest the Goel should pursue the innocent slayer in a rage, and overtake him, when the place of refuge" happened to be too far dis- tant. Now these are evidently the ordinances of a legislator not instituting an office before unknown, but merely guard- ing against the danger of the person who happened to hold it, being led by the violence of prejudice ct passion, to (^HAP. 35. NUMBERS 101 abuse its rights — that is, in the case in question, being hurried, by a false refinement of ideas on the score of honour, to shed the blood of an innocent man. I think I can discover one trace of the terrors which the GoH occa- sioned, as early as the history of the patriarchal families. When Rebecca learned that Esau was threatening to kill his brother Jacob, she endeavoured to send the latter out of the country, saying, " Why should I be bereft of you both in one day 1" Gen. xxvii. 45. She could not be afraid of the magistrate punishing the murder; for the patriarchs were subject to no superior in Palestine ; and Isaac was much too partial to Esau, for her to entertain any expecta- tion, that he would condemn him to death for it. It would, therefore, appear, that she dreaded lest he should fall by the hand of the blood-avenger, perhaps of some Ishmaelite. Now to this Goiil although Moses leaves his rights, of which indeed he would in vain have endeavoured to deprive him, considering that the desire of revenge forms a principal trait in the character of southern nations ; he nevertheless avails himself of the aid of certain particulars of those rights, in order to bring the prevalent ideas of honour un- der the inspection of the magistrate, without hurting their energy, and to give an opportunity of investigating the circumstances of the crime meant to be avenged, before its punishment should be authorized. We see that sacred places enjoyed the privileges of asyla : for Moses himself took it for granted, that the mur- derer would flee to the altar, and, therefore, he commanded that when the crime was deliberate and intentional, he should be torn even from the altar, and put to death, Exod. I xxi. 14. Among the Arabs we find that revenge likewise i ceased in sacred places, as for instance (long before Mo- ' hammed's time) m the country round about Mecca, par- ticularly during the holy month of concourse. In such places, therefore, honour did not bind the avenger to put a murderer to death.— Now Moses appointed, as places of refuge, six cities, to which ideas of sanctity were attached, because they were inhabited by the priests, Numb. xxxv. 9 — 35. Deut. xix. 1 — 10. To these every murderer might llee, and they were bound to protect him, until the circum- i stances of the case should be investigated; and, in order ;that the Goel might not lie in wait for him, or obstruct his {flight, it was enjoined, that the roads to these six cities ! should be kept in such a state, that the unfortunate man might meet with no impediment in his way, Deut. xix. 3. I do not by this understand, such a state of improvement as is necessary in our highways on account of carriages, but, 1. That the roads were not to make such circuits, as that the Goel could overtake the fugitive on foot, or catch 'jhim by lying in wait, before he reached an asylum; for, |in fact, the Hebrew word' (:i3) properly signifies to make ^{Straight ; 2. That guide-posts were to beset up, to prevent i'him from mistaking the right way; and, 3. That the bridges were not to be defective ;— in short, that nothing should retard his flight. If the Goel happened to find the fugitive before he reached an asylum, and put him to •death, in that case Moses yielded to the established preju- i idices respecting the point of honour. It was considered as «jdone in the ardour of becoming zeal, and subjected him to 'ino inquisition, Deut. xix. 6. If he reached a place of s refuge, he was immediately protected, and an inquiry was "then made, as to his right to protection and asylum; that ' is, whether he had caused his neighbour's death undesign- ! edly, or was a deliberate murderer. In the latter case he i- was judicially delivered to the Goel, who might put him to death in whatever way he chose, as we shall state at more length, under the head of capital punishments. Even , although he had fled to the altar itself, which enjoyed the ^ius asyli in the highest degree, it could not save him, if he K had committed real murder, Deut. xix. 14. If, however, the person was killed accidentally, and unintentionally, the ; author of his death continued in the place of refuge, and .; the fields belonging to it, which extended to the distance of V. 1,000 ells all around the walls of Levitical cities ; and he ( was there secure, in consequenc|Jr*f the sanctitv of the i place, without any reflection upon me honour of the Goel, ;; even in the opinion of the people. But further abroad he - durst not venture ; for if the Goel met with him without i; :the limits of the asylum, Moses paid no respect to the pop- > ;Ular point d'honneur ; he might kill him without subjecting i '^miself to any criminal accusation. The expression of 3 iMo es is, It is no blood, or blood-guilt, Numb. xxxv. 26, 27. This confinement to one place may, perhaps, be thought a hardship: but it was impossible 'in any other way to secure the safety of an innocent manslayer, without attacking the popular notions of honour ; that is, without making a law which would have been as little kept as are our laws against duelling. But by this exile in a strange city, Moses had it besides in view, to punish that impru- dence which had cost another man his life ; and we shall, in the sequel, meet with more instances of the severity of his laws against such imprudences. Allowing that it was an accident purely blameless, still its disagreeable conse- quences could not fail to make people more on their guard against similar misfortunes ; a matter to which, in many cases, our legislators, and our police-regulations, pay too little attention. For that very reason, Moses prohibited the fugitive from being permitted, by any payment of a fine, to return home to his own city before the appointed time, Numb. xxxv. 32. His exile in the city of refuge continued until the death of the high-priest. As soon as that event took place, the fugitive mJght leave his asylum, and return to his home in perfect security of his life, "under the protection of the laws. It is probable that this regula- tion was founded on some ancient principle of honour attached to the office of the Goel; of which, however, I have not been able to find any trace remaining. It would seem as if the death of the priest, or principal person in the nation, had been made the period beyond which the avengement of blood was not to extend, in the view of thus preventing the perpetual endurance of family enmities and outrages. We shall perhaps hereafter find an opportunity of giving a more particular illustration of this point. By these regulations, borrowed from those very notions of honour which influenced the Goel, Moses did not, it is true, effect the complete prevention of the shedding of inno- cent blood, (for so Moses terms it, in the case of the GoeVs killing the innocent manslayer in his flight ;) for civil laws cannot possibly prevent all moral evil ; nor yet was he able to protect the' man who had through mere inadvertence deprived another of his life, from all the vexatious conse- quences of such a misfortime : but thus much he certainly did effect, that the Goel could but very rarely kill an inno- cent man, and that a judicial inquiry always preceded the exercise of his revenge ; and that inquiry, even when it terminated in condemnation, drew after it no fresh blood- shed on the part of the murderer's family, because every one knew that no injustice was done him. Of course, ten murders did not now proceed from one, as was the case when the Goiil's procedure was altogether arbitrary, and subject to no restraint. It would appear that Moses had thus completely attained the object of his law. At least, in the history of the Israelitish nation, we find no examples of family enmities proceeding from the avengement of blood, oi of murders either openly or treacherously perpetrated from that national idea of honour ; and but one single instance of the abuse oi'Goelism, or rather where it was used merely for a pretext, and the transaction carried on in complete opposition to the acknowledged principles of honour. This instance we find in the history of David, in which the three following particulars relative to this subject deserve notice. 1. David, in his elegy on the death of Saul and Jonathan, seems, in one of his expressions, to allude to the avenge- ment of blood. The Arabs, in their poems, very commonly observe, that no dew falls on the place where a murder has been committed, until the blood has been avenged; and David thus exclaims. Ye mountains of Gilboa, on you fall neither deiv nor rain, 2. Sara. i. 21 ; which was as mucn as saying, the Philistines may look for my avengement of the death of Saul and Jonathan. This, however, is merely a poetical allusion ; for the law of Goelism did not extend to those slain in battle. 2. Joab assassinated Abner under the pretext of revenge for his having killed Asahel his brother in battle, 2 Sam. iii. 19 — 23. iii. 22 — 27. This, however, was a mere pre- text ; for Joab's only obje(?t was to get that man put out of the way, whom David had appointed to the chief command of the war. He afterward acted in the same manner to Amasa, who had killed no brother of his, but had been only guilty of the same crime of getting himself made general- issimo to Absalom, 2 Sam. xvii. 25. xx. 10. David, when he lay on his death-bed, made this remark on Joab's con- duct in these two instances, that blood shed in war was not, i02 NUMBERS Chap. 36. according to the Hebrew ideas of honour, to be avenged in peace ; and that he therefore regarded Joab as a wilful mur- derer : and he gave it in charge to Solomon his son to have nim punished as such, 1 Kings ii. 5, 6 3. When we take a connected view of the whole story related in 2 Sam. xiii. 37 to xiv. 20, we should almost sup- pose that David had for a time pursued his son Absalom, on account of his murdering his elder brother, not so much in discharge of his duty as a king, as in the capacity of Gotl, and that the idea of his honour, as such, had prevent- ed him from forgiving him. Absalom stayed out of tlie country with the king of Geshur, and yet David withdrew for a time in quest of him, chap. xiii. 39. This is proper- ly not the business of a magistrate, who is not required to punish a murderer who has fled from the country, but of a Goel. Allowing, however, that I were here in a mistake, thus much still is certain from chap. xiv. 10, 11, that there was yet a Gotl ; that to mothers he was an olaject of terror ; and that David, on some occasions, took upon him to prohibit him by an arbitrary decree from pursuing an actual mur- derer, when there were any particular circumstances in the case. So much concerning the rights of the Goel, as modified by the Mosaic statute. There is yet to be noticed one additional circumstance relative to it, entirely conform- able to oriental ideas of honour, and of great importance to the security of lives. Moses (Numb. xxxv. 31) positive- ly prohibits the receiving of a sum of money from a mur- derer in the way of compensation. By the ancient Arabian manners, too, we have seen that this was deemed disgrace- ful, tlere, therefore, Moses acted quite differently from Mohammed, and, as will be universally acknowledged, much more judiciously. — Michaelis. Ver. 31. Moreover, ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer, which is guihy of death ; but he shall be surely put to death. Moses absolutely forbids the acceptance of any compen- sation for the life of a murderer. Through the influence of money it appears that punishment was often evaded in .'jome countries, and probably till this time among the Jews. The Baron du Tott tells us, that in case of a duel, if one of the parties is killed, the other is tried for the offence, and if condemned, " the criminal is conducted to the place of punishment ; he who performs the office of execution- er takes on him likewise that of mediator, and negotiates till the last moment with the next of kin to the deceased, or his wife, who commonly follows, to be present at the execution. If the proposals are refused, the executioner performs the sentence ; if they are accepted, he reconducts the criminal to the tribunal to receive his pardon." — Bur- DER, CHAPTER XXXVI. V"er. 8. And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers. The assertion that no Israelite durst marry out of his tribe, and which we find repeated in a hundred books, is a silly fiction, directly confuted by the Mosaic writings* Even the high-priest himself was not obliged to confine him- .self to his own tribe ; nothing more being enjoined him, than to look out for an Israelitish bride. It was only in the single case of a daughter being the heiress of her father's land, that she was prohibited from marrying out of her tribe, in order that the inheritance might not pass to ano- ther tribe, Num. xxxvi. From that law, it clearly follows, that any Israelitess that had brothers, and of course was not an heiress, might marry whomsoever she pleased, and to me it is incomprehensible how this chapter should ever have been quoted as a proof of the assertion, that the Israel- ites durst not marry out of their tribes. A strange over- sight has been comniitted, in support of this erroneous opin- ion, which was devised for the purpose of proving (what scarcely required a proof) that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah ; for, say its advocates, " Had not Mary his true mo- ther been of the tribe of Judah, Joseph, a descendant of David's, could not have married her." Here, by the way, they might improve the proof, and make it still more sub- servient to their purpose, by adding that Mary must have been an heiress, and consequently, for that reason, durst not marry out of her tribe. But how surprising is it, that such incongruous blunders could possibly have been com- mitted 1 Luke expressly says, chap. i. 36, that Mary and Elizabeth were relations, and Elizabeth's husband was a priest. Hence her connexion with Mary is a most manifest proof, that Israelites of one tribe might marry into another, and that a priest, for instance, might marry a virgin of the house of Judah, or a descendant of Judah marry the daugh- ter of a Levite. It was even in the power of an Israelite ^o marry a wo- man born a heathen : although this also is denied by those who press upon Moses a law of their own. The statute in Deut. xxi. 10 — 14, already illustrated, puts this liberty be- yond a doubt : and he who disputes it, confounds two terms of very diflferent import and extent, heathen and Ca- Tiaanite. An Israelite might certainly marry a heathen woman, provided she no longer continued an idolatress;, which, however, she could not, as a captive and slave with- in Palestine, have been even previously suffered to be ; but all marriages with Canaanitish women was, by the statute Exod. xxxiv. 16, prohibited. In that statute, Moses had it particularly in view to prevent the Canaanites, who were both an idolatrous, and a very wicked race, from continu- ing to dwell in Palestine, and by intermarriages with Is- raelites, at last becoming one people with them : for he dreaded lest they should infect them with their vices and superstitions. Should I here be asked, " Wherein then did, Solomon sin, who, in 1 Kings, xi. 1,2, is certainly censured for marrying heathens?" my answer would be, (1.) that among the wives and concubines whom he took, there were Sidoni^ns, who belonged to the race of Canaanites, and these were expressly forbidden ; (2.) that, contrary to the positive prohibition of Moses, he kept a great seraglio ; (3.^ that he permitted hi.s wives to practise idolatry ; and, (4.) that he was himself led into it also : as we have only to read down to verse 8, to be convinced. I have only further to observe, what I remarked before, that the peo- ple of Israel must, in consequence of the toleration of po- lygamy, have been in a slate of continual decrease, had not marriages with foreigners, and particularly with the captive daughters of the neighbouring people, been per- mitted. — Michaelis. ..All DEUTERONOMY. CHAPTER I. Ver. 19. And when we departed from Horeb, we went through all that great and terrible wilder- ness, which ye saw by the way of the mountain of the Amorites, as the Lord our God com- manded us ; and we came to Kadesh-barnea. The divine blessing has not bestowed the same degree of fruitfulness on every part of Canaan. This fertile country is surrounded by deserts of immense extent, exhibiting a dreary waste of loose and barren sand, on which the skill and industry of man are able to make no impression. The only vegetable productions which occasionally meet the eye of the traveller in these frightful solitudes, are a coarse sickly grass, thinly sprinkled on the sand ; a plot of senna, or other saline or bitter herb, or an acacia bush ; even these but rarely present themselves to his notice, and afford him little satisfaction when they do, because they warn him that he is yet far distant from a place of abun- dance and repose. Moses, who knew these deserts well, calls them "great and terrible," "a desert land," "the waste howling wilderness." But the completest picture of the sandy desert is drawn by the pencil of Jeremiah, in which, with surprising force and brevity, he has exhibited every circumstance of terror, which the modern traveller details with so much pathos and minuteness; " Neither say they, Where is the Lord that brought us up out of the land of Egypt, that led us through the wilderness, through a laud of deserts and of pits, through a land of drought, and of the shadow of death, through a land that no man passed through, and where no man dwelt 1" — Paxton. Ver. 44. And the Amorites, which dwelt in that mountain, came out against you, and chased you, as bees do, and destroyed you in Seir, even unto Hormah. It is said of numerous armies, that they are like bees ; and of a multitude, who go to chastise a few, " Yes, they came upon us as bees." To a person who has proved "a man of numerous connexions, " Yes, you will have them as bees upon you." Of any thing which has come sud- denly, and in great numbers, " Alas, these things come as bees upon us." — Roberts. The bee is represented by the ahcients, as & vexatious, and even a formidable adversary ; and the experience of every person who turns his attention to the temper and habits of that valuable insect, attests the truth of their asser- tion. They were so troublesome in some districts of Crete, that, if we may believe Pliny, the inhabitants were actually compelled to forsake their habitations. And, according to ^lian, some places in Scythia, beyonxl the Ister, were for- merly inaccessible, on account of the numerous swarms of bees by which they were infested. The statements of these ancient writers is confirmed by Mr. Park, in the second volume of his Travels. Some of his associates imprudently attempted to rob a numerous hive, which they foimd in their way. The exasperated little animals rushed out to defend their property, and attacked the spoilers with so much fury, that they quickly compelled the whole com- pany, men, horses, and asses, to scamper off in all direc- tions. The horses were never recovered, and a number of the asses were so severely sttmg that they died next day: and so great was the loss our intrepid traveller sustained in the engagement, that he despondingly concluded his jouriiey was at an end. The allusion of Moses, therefore, to thiir fierce hostility, in the beginning of his last words to Israel, is both just and beautiful : " And the Amorites which dwelt in that mountain came out against you, and chased you as bees do, and destroyed you in Seir, even unto Hormah." The Amorites, it appears, were the most bitter adversaries to Israel, of all tha nations of Canaan; like bees that are easily irritated, that attack with great fury, and increasing numbers, the person that dares to molest their hive, and persecute him in his flight, to a con- siderable distance — the incensed Amorites had collected their hostile bands, and chased, with considerable slaughter, the chosen tribes from their territory. The Psalmist also complains, that his enemies compassed him about like bees ; fiercely attacking him on every side. The bee, when called to defend her hive, assails with fearless in- trepidity the largest and the most ferocious animal ; and the Psalmist found from experience, that neither the purity of his character, the splendour of his rank, nor the great- ness of his power, were sufficient to shield him from the covered machinations, or open assaults, of his cruel and numerous enemies. — Paxton. CHAPTER III. Ver. 11. For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants ; behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron : is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon ? nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man. This is a very curious account of a giant king: his bed- stead was made of iron, and we are able to ascertain its exact length, nine cubits, i. e. " after the cubit of a man." This alludes to the eastern mode of measuring from the tip of the middle finger to the elbow, which will be found to be in general eighteen inches. Thus his bedstead was thirteen feet six inches in length, and six feet in breadth. The hawkers of cloth very seldom carry with them a yard wand ; they simply measure from the eWow to the tip of the middle finger, counting two lengths of that for a yard. — Roberts. Ver. 25. I pray thee, let me go over, and see the good land that is beyond Jordan, that goodly mountain, and Lebanon. The beauties of Lebanon seem to have left a deeper impression in the mind of D'Arvieux. " After travelling six hours in pleasant valleys," says that writer, "and over mountains covered with different species of trees, we entered a small plain, on a fertile hill wholly covered with walnut-trees ana olives, in the middle of which is the vil- lage of Eden.— In spite of my weariness, I could not but incessantly admire this beautiful country. It is truly an epitome of the terrestrial paradise, of which it bears the name. Eden is rather a hamlet than a village. The houses are scattered, and separated from each other by gardens, which are enclosed by walls made of stones pileicl up without mortar. We quitted Eden about eight o'clock in the morning, and advanced to mountains so extremely high, that we seemed to be travelling in the middle regions- of the atmosphere. Here the sky was clear and seren«= above us, while we saw below us thick clouds dissolving in rain, and watering the plains. After three hours of la borious travelling, we arrived at the famous cedars abou* eleven o'clock. We counted twenty-three of them. The circumference of these trees is thirty-six feet. The bark of the cedar resembles that of the pine ; the leaves and cone also bear considerable resemblance. The stem Is upright, the wood is hard, and has the reputation of being incorruptible. The leaves are long, narrow, rough, very green, ranged in tufts along the branches ; they shoot in spring, and fall in the beginning of winter. Its flowers and fruit resemble those of the pine. From the full grown 104 DEUTERONOMY. Chap. 4—6. trees, a fluid trickles naturally, and without incision •, this is clear, transparent, whitish, and after a time dries and hardens: it is supposed to possess great virtues. — The place where these gi^t trees are stationed, is in a plain of nearly a league in circumference, on the summit of a mount which is environed on almost all sides by other mounts, so high that their summits are always covered with snow. This plain is level, the air is pure, the heav- ens always serene. On otie side of this plain is a fright- ful precipice, from whence flows a copious stream, which, descending into the valley, forms a considerable part of the Holy River, or Nahar Kadisha. The view along this valley is interesting; and the crevices of the rocks are filled with earth of so excellent a quality, that trees grow in them; and being continually refreshed with the vapours rising from the streams below, attain to considerable di- mensions. Nor is the sense of smelling less gratified than *hat of sight, by the fragrance diffiised from the odoriferous plants around." He afterward says, " the banks of the river appeared enchanted. This stream is principally formed by the source which issues below the cedars, but is contin- ually augmented by a prodigious number of rills and fountains, which fall from the mountain, gliding along the clefts of the rocks, and forming many charming natural cascades, which communicate cooling breezes, and banish the idea of being in a country subject to extreme heat. If to these enjoyments we add that of the nightingale's song, it must be g'ranted that these places are infinitely agree- able." The cedars which he visited, encircle the region of perpetual snow. Lebanon is in this part free from rocks, and only rises and falls with small easy uneven- nesses, but is perfectly barren and desolate. The ground, where not concealed by the snow, for several hours' riding appeared to be covered with a sort of white slate, thin and smooth. Yet these dreary summits are not without their use ; they serve as a conservatory for abundance of snow, which, thawing in the heat of summer, furnishes ample supplies of water to the rivers and fountains in the valleys below. In the snow, he saw the prints of the feet of sev- eral wild beasts, which are the sole proprietors of these upper parts of the mountain. Maundrell found only six- teen cedars of large growth, and a natural plantation of smaller ones, which were very numerous. One of the largest was twelve yards six inches in girth, and thirty- seven yards in the spread of its boughs. At six yards from the ground, it was divided into five limbs, each equal to a great tree. Dr. Richardson visited them in 1818, and found a small clump of large and tall and beautiful trees, which he pronounces the most picturesque productions of the vege- table world that he had ever seen. In this clump are two generations of trees; the oldest are large and massy, rear- ing their heads to an enormous height, and spreading their branches to a great extent. He measured one, not the largest in the clump, and found it thirty-two feet in cir- cumference. Seven of these trees appeared to be very old, the rest younger, though, for want of space, their branches are not so spreading. This statement sheds a clear and steady light on those passages of scripture which refer to Lebanon ; and enables us to reconcile with ease several apparent contradictions. So famous was this stupendous mountain in the days of Moses, that to be permitted to see it, was the object of his earnest desires and repeated prayers; and as the strongest expression of his admiration, he connects it in his addresses to the throne of his God, with Zion, the future seat of the divine glory. " I pray thee, let me go over and see the good land that is beyond Jordan ; that goodly mountain and Lebanon." — Paxton. CHAPTER IV. Ver. 20. But the Lord hath taken you, and brought you forth out of the iron furnace, even out of Egypt, to be unto him a people of in- heritance, as 7/e are this day. It has been observed by chymical writers, not only that iron melts slowly even in the most violent fire, but also that it ignites, or becomes red-hot, long before it fuses : and any one may observe the excessive brightness of iron when red, or rather 7chile hot. Since, therefore, it requires the strongest fire of all metals to fuse it, there is a peculiar propriety in the expression, a furnace for iron, or an iron furnace, for violent and sharp affiictions. — Burder. CHAPTER V. Ver. 14. But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy man-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thine ox, nor thine ass, nor any of thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates ; that thy man-servant and thy maid-servant may rest as well as thou. In order to render the situation of slaves more tolerable, Moses made the three following decrees for their benefit. 1. On the sabbath dav they were to be exempted from all manner of work. Of course every week they enjoyed one day of that rest which is so suitable to the nature of the human frame, and so requisite to the preservation of health and strength, Exod. xx. 10. Deut. v. 14, 15. In the laUcr of these passages it is expressly mentioned, that one design of the sabbath was to give a day of rest to slaves, and the Israelites are reminded of their own servitude in Egypt, when they longed in vain for days of repose. 2. The fruits growing spontaneously during the sab- batical year, and declared the property of none, were des- tined by Moses for the slaves and the indigent. 3. The Israelites were wont, at their high festivals, to make feasts of their tithes, firstlings, and sacrifices ;' indeed almost all the great entertainments were offering-feasts. To these, by the statutes of Deut. xii. 17, 18 and xvi. 11, the slaves were to be invited. Such occasions were there- fore a sort of saturnalia to them : and we cannot but extol the clemency and humanity of that law, which procured them twice or thrice a-year a few days' enjoyment of those luxuries, which they would doubtless relish the more, the poorer their ordinary food might be. It was a part of the good treatment due to domestic ani- mals, that they were to be allowed to share the enjoyment of the sabbatical rest. On the people's own account this was no doubt necessary; because in general beasts can perform no work without man's assistance : but still Moses expressly declares that his commandment respecting the sabbath had a direct reference to the rest and refreshment of beasts as well as of man. His words are, " On the seventh day thou shalt rest from thy labour; that thine ox and thine ass ma}r also rest, and thy servant and strangqr may be refreshed," Exod. xxiii. 12. xx. 10. Deut. v. 14. In fact, some such alternation of labour and rest seems necessary to the pres- ervation of beasts : for those that perform the same kind of work day after day, without any interruption, soon be- come stupid and useless. At least, we see this the case with horses : and the reader will not take it amiss, that a town-bred writer, having better access to observe the effects of labour on them, than on oxen, should prefer taking an example from the former. A horse that has to travel three German miles every day will not hold out long : but, with intervening days of rest, in the same time, he will be able to go over a much greater space without injury. He will, for example, in ten days travel thirty-five German miles, with three resting days, that is, at the rate of five miles each day of the other seven. This fact is so well known, that in riding schools, one or tAvo days of rest, besides Sun- day, are usually allowed to the horses, in order to preserve their spirit and acrfvity ; whereas the post-horses, which are constantly at work, soon become stiff and unserviceable. The case is probably the same with other beasts of burden, although they do not require so many intervals of rest as horses. And hence the good treatment of beasts enjoined in the Mosaic law, and the sabbatical rest ordained for their refreshment, was highly expedient, even in an eco- nomical point of view, and wisely suited to the circum- stances ot a people, whose cattle formed the principal part of their subsistence. — Michaelis. CHAPTER VL Ver. 7. And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children. If you inquire how a good schoolmaster teaches his pu- pils, the answer will be, very koormeyana, i. e. " sharply, makes sharp, they are full of points." A man of a keen Chap. 6—8. DEUTERONOMY. 105 and cultivated mind, is said to be full of points. " He is wt'U sharpened." — Roberts. Ver. 8. And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thy hand, and they shall be as frontlets be- tween thine eyes. I look upon the words in Deut. vi. 8, as not properly a law, but an admonition; because they merely occur in an harangue which Moses addressed to the people. The Orientals make great use of amulets ; — a subject on which I cannot here expatiate, but of which I generally treat un- der Art. 26, of my Hebrew Antiquities. These amulets C(jnsist sometimes of jewels and other ornaments, and some- times of certain sentences, or unintelligible lines, and Abra- cadabra, written on billets, or embroidered on pieces of linen. Some such things the Israelites, in those days, seem to have worn on their foreheads, and on their hands ; and the Mohammedans do so still. For how often do we find on their breasts a passage from the Koran, which is said to make them invulnerable, or rather actually does so ; for this I know for certain, that no Turk, wearing any such billet, was ever yet slain or M^ounded in battle, excepting ill the single case (which, indeed, they themselves except) ol' his death-hour being come, according to the decree of God. It would appear, that with regard to these embroi- dered phylacteries, the Israelites, in the days of Moses, did not entertain such superstitious ideas, (else would he prob- ably have forbidden them,) but only wore them as orna- ments, and for fashion's sake. As Moses, therefore, wished to exhort the Israelites to maintain the remembrance of his laws in every possible way, and, in a particular man- ner, to impress it on the hearts of their children, he sug- gested to them a variety of expedients for the purpose ; and this among others, that if they chose to wear any embroi- dered ornament on the hand or forehead, it should not con- sist of any thing useless, and still less of any superstitious nonsense, but rather of sentences out of the laws, which their children would thus be in the way of learning. If, however, the fashion changed, and embroidery was no more worn, the Israelites were no longer bound to wear embroidered linen, or billets inscribed with sentences from the Mosaic law; and that the Jews, during the time of prayer, still use them under the name of Thefdlin, pro- ceeds from a misconception of the statute in question. A further detail on this subject, with the proofs that the words of Moses in this passage are not to be understood as only f]2:urative, I cannot here give : but I give it, as I have said, in my Hebrew Antiquities. To most of the read- ers of the present work, who may be desirous of having a philosophical glance at the ancient laws of mankind, researches merely antiquarian would not afford much gratification. — Michaelis. Ver. 9. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates. The observation made in the beginning of the preceding article is equally applicable to the subject of the present one. The words of Moses in Deut. vi. 9, immediately fol- lowing those just illustrated, are in like manner to be under- stood, not as a positive injunction, but as an exhortation to inscribe his laws on the door-posts of their houses. In Syria and the adjacent countries, it is usual at this day to place inscriptions above the doors of the houses, not, as the vulgar among us do, in doggerel rhyme, but consisting of passages from the Koran, or from the best poets ; and some of them, that are quoted in books of travels, are truly elegant. This must now be a very ancient practice, as It existed in the time of Moses, For when he exhorts the Israelites to take every opportunity in inculcating his laws on their children, we find him suggesting to them this as one means of doing so ; " Write them on the doors of your touses, and on the gates of your cities." In these words we have not properly a statute ; for if the Israelite did not choose to have an inscription over his door, he had no oc- casion to make one; but they are merely introduced in an ex- t| hortatory discourse to the people, as furnishing an instance ' of the means which they might take, to impress the laws upon the minds of their posterity in their earliest years. Among us, where, by the aid of printing, books are so abundantly multiplied, and may be put into the hands of 14 every child, such measures would be quite superfluous; but if we would enter into the ideas of Moses, we must place ourselves in an age, when the book of the law could only come into the hands of a few opulent people. — Mi- chaelis. CHAPTER VII. Ver. 20. Moreover, the Lord thy God will send the hornet among them, until they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed. To the people of England this may appear a puerile way of punishing men, but they should recollect that the natives of the East wear scarcely any clothes, having, gen- erally speaking, only a piece of cloth round their loins. They are, therefore, much more exposed than we are to the sting of insects. The sting of the hornet and wasp of those regions is much more poisonous than in Europe, and the insect is larger in size. I have heard of several who died from having a single sting; and not many days ago, as a woman was going to the well " to draw water,"' a hor- net stung her in the cheek, and she died the next day. I have many times seen the hornet attack and kill the taran- tula. Under large verandahs the former may be seen fly- ing near the roof, searching in every direction for his foe, and never will he leave them, till he has accomplished his destruction. Sometimes they both fall from the roof to- gether, when the hornet may be seen thrusting his sting most furiously in the tarantula, and it is surprising to see with what dexterity the former eludes the bite of the latter. The people often curse each other by saying, Unsuttar- Aniverum-KuUive Kuttam, i. e. " May all around thee be stung by the hornet!" (meaning the person and his rela- tions.) The toddy drawers use this imprecation more than other people, because the hornet's nest is generally found in the top of the palmirah or cocoa-nut tree, whence they pro- cure tne toddy. When they ascend, iheir hands and feet being engaged, they cannot defend themselves against their x attacks. The god Siva is described as having destroyed many giants by hornets. — Roberts. CHAPTER VIII. Ver. 7. For the Lord thy Godbringeth thee into a good land; a land of brooks of water, of fountains, and depths that spring out of valleys and hills. The account which has been now given of the soil and productions of Canaan, will enable the reader to perceive with greater clearness, the force and justice of the prom- ise made by Moses to his nation, a little before he died : " The Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land; a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths, that spring out of valleys and hills ; a land of wheat and barley, and vines, and fig-trees, and pomegranates, a land of oil olive, and honey," If to the natural fertility of this highly-favoured country be added, the manner in which it was divided among the tribes of Israel, it will furnish an easy and satisfactory answer to the question which the infidel has often put : " How could so small a country as Canaan maintain so immense a popu- lation, as we find in the writings of the Old Testament '?" That rich and fertile region was divided into small inheri- tances, on which the respective proprietors lived and reared their families. Necessity, not less than a spirit of industry, required that no part of the surface capable of cultivation should be sufiered to lie waste. The husbandman carried his improvements up the sides of the steepest and most rugged mountains, to the very top ; he converted every patch of earth intoavineyard,oroliveplantation ; he covered the bare rocks with soil, and thus turned them into fruitful fields ; where the steep was too great to admit of an inclined plane, he cut away the face of the precipice, and built walls around the mountain to support the earth, and planted his terraces with the vine and the olive. These circles of excellent soil were seen rising gradually from the bottom to the top of the mountains, where the vine and the olive, shading the intermediate rocks with the liveliest verdure, and bend- ing under the load of their valuable produce, amply reward- ed the toils of the cultivator. The remains of 35;">i) Veiober, he 'made to pass through, by the mere transposition of the sec- ond radical into the place of the first. The following passages, however, are decisive of the reality of sacrifi- cing their children. 1. Ezek. xvi. 21, (where we find the first-mentioned ex- pression,) Thou hast slain my sons, and. given them, to cause them pass through to them. Here it is evident thai, to pass through, or to cause to pass through the fire, can be nothing else than burning, because the sons were previously slain. 2. The passages where the word (jpv) Saraf, to burn, is used ; and where no suspicion of any various reading can take place ; Deut. xii. 31. Jer. vii. 31. xix. 5. '3. Psalm cvi. 37, 38. " Their sons and daughters they sacrificed unto devils. They shed the innocent blood of iJieir children, and offered it to the gods of Canaan, and the land was profaned with blood." The punishment of those who offered human sacrifices was stoning;, and that, as I think, so summarily, that the bystanders, when any one was caught in such an act, had alright to stone him to death on the spot, without any judi- cial inquiry whatever. Whatever Israelite, says Moses, in Lev. XX. 2, or stranger dwelling among you, gives oiie of his children to Moloch, shall die ; his neighbours shall stone him, to d^ath. These are not the terms in which Moses usually speaks of the punishment of stoning judicially inflicted ; but, all the people shall stone him ; the hands of the witnesses' shall be the first upon him. Besides, what follows a little after, in verses 4 and 5, does not appear to me as indicative of any thing like a matter of judicial procedure ; If the neigh- hours shut their eyes, and will not'see him giving his children to Moloch, nor put him to dea.th, God himself loill be the aven- ger of his crime. I am therefore of opinion, that in regard to this most extraordinary and most unnatural crime, which, however, could not be perpetrated in perfect secre- cy, Moses meant to give an extraordinary injunction, and to let it be understood, that whenever a parent was about to sacrifice his child, the first person who observed him was to hasten to its help, and the people around were in- rtantly to meet, and to stone the unpatural monster to death. In fact, no crime so justly authorizes extrajudicial ven- geance, as this horrible cruelty perpetrated on a helpless child ; in the discovery of which we are always sure to have either the lifeless victim as a proof, or else the living testimony of a witness who is beyond all suspicion ; and where the mania of human sacriifices prevailed to such a pitch as among the Canaanites, and got so completely the netter of all the feelings of nature, it was necessary to ( ounteract its effects by a measure equally extraordinary mid summary. — Michaelis. Ver. 11. Or a charmer, or a consulter with fa- joaih'ar spijits, or a wizard, or a necromaricer. Sorcery is the fruitful source of numerous evils in the East. Charms and counter-charms call for the ingenuity, the property, the hopes, and fears of thousands. They are often used lo efi'eci ihe most diabolical purposes, and many a seduction is attributed to their supernatural power. The prophet Isaiah gives a description of the voice of a famil- iar spirit, and of its proceedmg like a whisper from the dust. " Thou shalt be brought down, and shalt speak out of the ground, and thy speech shall be low out of the dust, and thy voice shall be as of one that hath a familiar spirit, out of the ground, and thy speech shall whisper out of the dust." Isa. xxix. 4. The margin has, for whisper, " peep or chirp." Lev. xix. 31. 1 Sam. xxviii. 7. The deluded Hindoos, in great emergencies, have recourse to familiar spirits, for the purpose of knowing how they may avoid the evil which is expected, or has in part already come. In the distraction of their minds, they run to the " consulter with familiar spirits," make known their desperate case, and entreat him to lend his assistance. Those " wizards that peep and that mutter," and who seek " for the living to the dead," Isa. viii. 19, are generally frightful in their persons, and disgusting in their manners. See the aged impostor, with a staff in his hand: his person bent by years ; his wild, piercing, cat-like eye ; a scowling, search- ing look; a clotted beard ; a toothless mouth ; dishevelled hair ; a mumbling unearthly voice ; his more than half-na- ked body, covered with ashes; a wild unsteady gait, joined with the other insignia of his office; — give a fearful inliu- ence to his infernal profession. A man who is in distress, and who has resolved to consult with a familiar spirit, sends for two magicians: the one is called the Mavihera- vdthe, i. e. he who repeats the incantations; the other, the Anjanam-Pdrkeravan, i. e. he who looks, and who answers to the questions of the former. His hand is rubbed with the Anjanam, which is made of the burnt bones of the sloth, and the scull of a virgin ; and when the ceremonies have commenced, he looks steadily into his hand, and can never wink or take off his eyes till all shall be finished. On the ground are placed rice, cocoa-nuts, plantains, areca nuts, betel leaves, milk, camphire, and frankincense. The chief magician then, with a loud voice, begins to invoke the nine gods — Ammon, Pullidr, Scandan, Aiyenar, lyaner, Veerapatteran, Anjana, Anuman, Viraver. He then falls to the earth (as do all present) nine times, and begins to whisper and "mutter," while his face is in the "dust," and he who looks in the hand " peeps" and stares for the beings who have to appear. All then stand up, and the first wizard asks the second, " What do you see V He re- plies, " My hand is cracked, has opened, and I see on the groimd." "What else do you see?" — "All around me is light — come, Pulliar, come." " He comes ! he comes !" (His person, shape, and dress, are then described.) The other eight gods are now entreated to appear ; and as they approach, the second person says, "They come! they come !" and they are invited to be seated in the places pre- pared for them. The first magician then inquires of the assembled gods, what is the cause of the affliction, adversi- ty, or danger of the person, for whom the ceremonies have been instituted 1 He who " peeps" in the hand then re- plies, and mentions the name of the evil spirit, who has produced all the mischief The malignant troubler is summoned to appear, and to depart ; but should he refuse, he is bound, and carried off by the gods. Is it not probable that Saul, and the woman who had " a familiar spirit at Endor," were engage^ in a similar way 1 Saul was in great distress, for the Lord would' neither answer him " by dreams, nor by Urim, nor by prophets;" and being wound up to desperation, he determined to consult " with familiar spirits." He took " two men" with him, who were proba- bly qualified like the two used by the Hindoos. From the fear which the woman showed, it is probable her incanta- tions had not exactly answered her expectations, because . ytce" when she saw Samuel, pr vingthat she did not expect to see him, and that, therefore, " she cried with a loud voice" when she saw Samuel, prt> he was sent by some other power; Saul inquired, " What sawest thou 1" which agrees with the question proposed by the first magician to his assistant, as to what he saw through the crack of his hand in the earth. The witch then replied to Saul, " I saw gods ascending out of the earth," which naturally reminds u^> of the nine gods which are believed to ascend after the incantations of the wizard. Saul then asked, " What form is he of 1" and the witch said he was J Ghap. 19—21. DEUTERONOMY. 115 old, and covered with a mantle, which also finds a parallel in the description of " the shape and dress" given of Pulliar by the second magician. I am, therefore, of opinion, that God allowed Samuel to come to Saul, or sent him ; and that the witch was confounded and terrified at the result of her incantations. — Roberts. CHAPTER XIX. Ver. 14. Thou shalt not remove thy neighbour's land-mark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance, which thou shalt inherit in the land that the Lord thy God giveth thee to pos- sess it. When the sons of Israel had conquered the land of prom- ise, it was, by the divine command, surveyed and divi- ded by lot, first among the twelve tribes ; and then the por- tion of each tribe was laid out in separate inheritances, according to the number of the families composing the tribe ; and thus every man in the nation had his field, which he was directed to cultivate for the support of himself and his family. To prevent mistake and litigation, these fields were marked off by stones set up on the limits, which could not be removed without incurring the wrath of heav- en. The divine command, in relation to this matter, runs in these terms. " Thou shalt not remove thy neigh- bour's land-mark, which they of old time have set in thine inheritance, which thou shalt inherit in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee to possess." In Persia, land- jnarks are still used: in the journey from Arzroum to Amasia, Morier found the boundaries of each man's pos- session, here and there, marked by large stones. Land- marks were used in Greece long before the age of Homer ; for when Minerva fought with Mars, she seized with her powerful hand, a piece of rock, lying in the plain, black, rugged and large, which ancient men had placed to mark -he boundary of the field. — Paxton. CHAPTER XX. Ver. 19. When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by forcing an axe against them : for thou mayest eat of theni, and thou shalt not cut them do\vn, (for the tree of the field is man's life,) to employ them in the siege. Can it be a matter of surprise that the Orientals have a great aversion to cut down any tree which bears fruit, when it is known that they principally live on vegetable produc- tions 1 Ask a man to cut down a cocoa-nut or palmirah tree, and he will say, (except when in want, or to oblige a great person,) " What ! destroy that which gives me food? from which I have thatch for my house to defend me from the sun and the rain '? which gives me oil for my lamp, a ladle for my kitchen, and charcoal for my fire? from which I have sugar for my board, baskets for my fruits, a bucket for my well, a mat for my bed, a pouch for my betel leaf, leaves for my books, a fence for my yard, and a broom for my house'? Destroy such a tree 1 Go to some needy wretch who has pledged his last jewel, and who is anxious to eat his last meal." — Roberts. CHAPTER XXI. Ver. 6. And all the elders of that city, that are next unto the slain ma?i, shall wash their hands over tlie heifer that is beheaded in the valley. When a great man refuses to grant a favour to a friend or relation, the latter asks, " What ! are you going to wash your hands of me?" " Ah ! he has washed bis hands of all his relations ;" which means, he will not have any thing more to do with them ; he is entirely free, and will" not be accountable for them. Hence the Tamul proverb, Avon elldtilum kai kaluvi nitkerdn, i. e. " He has washed his hands of all."— Roberts. Ver. 12. Then thou shalt bring her home to thy house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; 13. And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thy house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month : and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. The margin has, instead of pare her nails, " or suffer 7C GROW ;" which is, I doubt not, the true meaning. This wo- man was a prisoner of war, and was about to become the wife of the man who had taken her captive. Having thus been taken from her native land, having had to leave her earliest and dearest connexions, and now to become the wife of a foreigner, and an enemy, she would naturally be overwhelmed with grief. To acquire a better view of hei state, let any woman consider herself in similar circum- stances. She accompanies her husband, or father, to the battle ; the enemy becomes victorious, and she is carried off by the hand of a ruthless stranger, and obliged to sub- mit to his desires. Poignant indeed would be the sorrow of her mind*. The poor captive was to " shave her head" in. token of her distress, which is a custom in all parts of the East at this day. A son on the death of his father, or a woman on the decease of her husband, has the head shaved in token of sorrow. To shave the head also, is a punish- ment inflicted on females for certain crimes. The fair captive, then, as a sign of her misery, was to shave her head, because her father or mother was among the slain, or in consequence of having become a prisoner of war. It showed her sorrow ; and was a token of her submission. (See also Job i. 20. See on 2 Chronicles xvi. 14. Isa. vii. 20, and xviii. 2.) But this poor woman was to suffer her nails to grow, as an additional emblem of her distress. That it does not mean she was to pare her nails, as the text has it, is established by the custom in the East, of al- lowing them to grow, when in sorrow. The marginal reading, therefore, would have been much better for the text. When people, either in the church or state, are per- forming penance, or are in captivity, or disgrace, or pris- on, or are devotees, they suffer their nails to grow ; and some may be seen; as were those of the monarch of Baby- lon, in his sorrow, " like birds' claws," literally folding round the ends of the fingers, or shooting through the backs of their hands. But when men fast, which is sometimes done for one or two years, or when husbands fast during their wives' first pregiiancy, they suffer their nails to grow ; also a'female, when in sorrow from other causes, does not "pare her nails" until she has performed the ceremony call- ed Antherette. — Roberts. There is a passage in Deuteronomy xxi. 12, about the sense of which our translators appear to have been extreme- ly uncertain : translating one- clause of the 12th verse, a^ul pare her nails, in the text ; and the margin giving the claust; a quite opposite sense, " suffer to grow." So that, according to them, the words signify, that the captived woman should be obliged, in the case referred to by Moses, to pare her nails, or, to suffer them to gr(hc, but they could not tell which of th6sei two contradictory things the Jewish legislator re- quired; the Jewish doctors are, in like manner, divided in their opinion on this subject. To me it seems very plain, that it was not a management of afl^iction and mourning that was enjoined; such an interpretation agrees not witli the putting off the raiment of her captivity ; but then I very much question whether the paring her nails takes in the whole of the intention of Moses. The precept of the law was, that she should make her nails: so the Hebrew words literally signify. Making her nails, signifies making her nails neat, beautifying them, making them pleasing to the sight, or scmething of that sort : dressing them is the word our translators have chosen, according to the margin. The 2 Sam. xix. 24, which the critics have cited on this occa- sion, plainly proves this : " Mephibosheth, the son of Saul, came down to meet the king, and had neither made his feet, nor made his beard, nor washed his clothes, from the day the kingdeparted, until the day he came again m peace." It is the same word with that in the text, and our translator «j have rendered it in one clause dressed, in the margin of Deut. xxi. dressed his feet: and in the other trimmed, nor trimmed his heard. Making the feet, seems here to mean washing the feet, paring their nails, perhaps anointing, or otherwise perfuming them, as he was a prince; see Luke vii. 46. As making his beard may mean combing, curling, 16 DEUTERONOMY. Chap. 22. perfuming it ; every thing, in a word, that those that were people of distinction, and in a state of joy, were wont to do. Making her ruiils, undoubtedly means paring them ; but it must mean too every thing else relating to them, that was wont to be done for the beautifying them, and rendering them beautiful. We have scarcely any notion of any thing else but paring them ; biit the modern eastern women have ; they stain them with the leaves of an odoriferous plant, which they call Al-henna, of a red, or, as others express it, a tawny saffron colour. But it may be thought, that is only a modern mode of adorning their nails : Hasselquist, how- ever, assures us, it was an ancient oriental practice. " The Al-henna," he tells us, " grows in India, and in Upper and Lower Egypt, flowering from May to August. The leaves are pulverized, and made into a paste with water: they bind this paste on the nails of their hands and feet, and keep it on all night. This gives them a deep yellow, which is greatly admired by the eastern nations. The colour lasts for three or four weeks, before there is occasion to re- new it. The custom is so ancient in Egypt, that I have seen the nails of mummies died in this manner. The pow- der is exported in large quantities yearly, and may be reckoned a valuable commodity." It appears by this to be a very ancient practice ; and since mummies were before the time of Moses, this custom of dying the nails might be as ancient too ; though we do not suppose the mummies Has- selquist saw, with their nails thus coloured, were so old as his time. If it was practised in Egypt before the law was given, we may believe the Israelites adopted it, since it appears to be a most universal custom now in the eastern coun- tries : Dr. Shaw observing that all the African ladies that can purchase it, make use ©f it, reckoning it a great beauty ; as we learn from Rauwolff, it appears also to the Asiatic females. I cannot but think it most probable then, that making the nails, signifies tinging as well as paring them. Paring alone, one would imagine too trifling a circum- stance to be intended here. No commentator, however, that I know of, has taken any notice of ornamenting the nails by colouring them. As for shaving the head, which is joined with making the nails, it was a rite o.f cleansing, as appears from Lev. xiv. 8, 9, and Num. vi. 9, and used by those v/ho, after having been in an afflicted and squalid state, appeared before persons to whom they desired to render themselves acceptable, and who were also wont to change their raiment on the same occasion. See Gen. xli. 14. — Harmer. Ver. 17. But he shall acknowledge Ihe son of the hated for the first-born, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he zsthe beginning of his strength; the right of the first-born is his. Next to the father, the first-born of a family possessed the greatest rights. There were not, however, in a family as many first-born as mothers ; in other words, fo be so called, It was not enough that a man should be the first Irait of the mother, or, as the Hebrews term it, Pheter Re- ckem, (om -itas) but that he should, at the same time, be the first son of bis father, who was called Becor, (-»^33) ai.d the hegimiing of his strength. The law of Deut. xxi. 15 — 17, places this beyond dAubt, and the familv history of Jacob confirms it. For though Jacob had four wives, and chil- dren by them all, yet he gave the birthright to one son only, 1 Chron. v. 1, 2. That right Reuben had forfeited by a great crime ; but if he had not done so, he would certainly have been considered as the only first-born, as he alone is indeed called so in the history, Gen. xlix. 3. If, instead of this, the first son of every mother had been denominated the first-born, it would have been impossible that, among a people consisting of 600,000 adult males, and where there mast have been at least 300,000 males above 20 years of age, there could be numbered no more than 22,000 first- born of a month old, and above it; because this would have required that every mother, one with another, had brought 40 (but because it is so incredible I will write the word at length, /or^y) children into the world. In my Dissertation, r>e Censihis Uebrdornm, to which I here refer the reader, I have illustrated this point at greater length. How the mat- ter was settled when a father had his first-born son by a widow, that had had children by her former marriage, 1 do not historically know ; but this'much is certain, that such son could not be called Pheter Bechem, the first-fruit of the mother ; and, therefore, could be none of the first-born who, by the Levitical law, (Exod. xiii. 12. Numb. iii. 40— 51,) were consecrated to the Lord ; but still he probably enjoyed the rights of a first-born in relation to his brothers. This, however, was a case that could rarely occur, because it appears that the Hebrews seldom married widows who had been mothers ; although I do find one example of such a marriage. Besides his double share of the inheritance, the first-born in patriarchal families had great privileges, and a sort of authority over his l^rethren ; just as at present an Arab emir is, for the most part, only the first-born oj the first-horn of his family, and, as such, rules a horde, com- posed merely of his kinsmen. This was also the case under the Mosaic polity, though with some limitation in point of authority ; and hence we find in the genealogies of the first book of Chronicles, the first-bom is often likewise termed the head (iPfs-^n) of the family ; and in chap. xxvi. 10, it is stated as a circumstance somewhat singular and unusual, that a father constituted one, who was not a first-born, the head. How much further these rights extended, I know not, excepting only in this particular, that the first-born was only the head of the lesser family. — Michaelis. Ver. 19. Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of the city, and unto the gate of his place. The gates of cities, in these days, and for many ages af- ter, were the places of judicature and common resort. Here the governors and elders of the city went to hear complaints, administer justice, make conveyances of titles and estates, and, in short, to transact all the public afiairs of the place. And from hence is that passage in the Psalmist, " They shall not be ashamed when they speak to their ene- mies in the gate." (Ps. cxxvii. 5.) It is probable that the room, or hall, where the magistrates sat, was over the gate, because Boaz is said to go up to the gate ; and the reason of having it built there, seems to have been for the con- venience of the inhabitants, who, being all husbandmen, and forced to pass and repass every morning and evening as they went and came from their labour, might be more easily called, as they went by, whenever they'were wanted to appear in any business.— Burder. Ver. 23. His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in anywise bury him that day. An Englishman is astonished in the East, to see how soon after death the corpse is buried. Hence a new-comer, on hearing of the death of a servant, or native officer, who died in the morning, and who is to be interred in the even- ing, is almost disposed to interfere with what is to him ap- parently a barbarous practice. When the cholera prevails, it is truly appalling to see a man in one hour in health, and the next carried to his long-home. The reason assigned for this haste is the heat of the climate. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXII. Ver. 4. Thou shalt not see thy brother's ass oi his ox fall down by the way, and hide thysel from them : thou shalt surely help him to li( them up again. Whoever saw a beast tottering or lying under the weighl? of his burden, was bound to help him ; and that with the same exertion and perseverance as the owner himself was doing, or would have done. Nor durst he (for this the, words of Moses seem to imply) desist, but irith the owner that is, until the owner himself left the beast, seeing hin past relief, Exod. xxiii. 5. Both these were incumbent di? ties even when the beast belonged to an enemy; and thi passages above referred to, expressly mention tlie ox an( ass of an enemy. This is reasonable ; for we expect tha even our enemy will be hurnane enough to foreget his en< mity, and give us his aid in a time of need, or, at any rate that he will not be so little as to extend his enmity to i beast quite innocent of our quarrel, and that lies in distre Chap. 22. DEUTERONOMY. 117 before his eyes. What we expect, we should do in our turn ; and if we will not listen to the suggestions of moral obligation, still we must see, that among a nation of hus- bandmen and herdsmen, it was a matter of great import- ance to preserve the lives of work-beasts. And upon the same principle, we might perhaps be enjoined to extinguish, if need were, a fire in our enemy's house, as if it were our own. How humane soever this law of Moses may appear, we must at the same time recollect, that it was not given to a people like ourselves, but to a people among whom every individual generally had cattle ; so that they could not but be iniliienced by the great duty of reciprocity, which among us, at least in towns, does not here hold, because but few have cattle. — Amon^ the Israelites, none almost could be so unac- c nstomed to their management, or to their relief in distress, as our town's-people are. This last circumstance is peculiarly deserving of notice. I grant that such a law would, in Ger- ]nany, be a very strange one, if accompanied with no limita- tion to certain classes of the community ; for he who is not from his infancy conversant withbeasts, seldom acquires the confidence or dexterity requisite for their aid when in dan- ger, without hurting himself He, perhaps, sits perfectly well (ai horseback, and can do all that belongs to a good rider, when mounted; but to help up with a horse fallen down uncier his load, or to stop one that has run off, would not be his forte. — Add to this, that among us, neither the ox, nor the ass, but the horse alone, is so honourable, that a gentleman could help up with him, without demeaning him- self, and being laughed at. But among a nation of farm- ers, who ploughed with oxen and asses, and where there were no hereditary noblesse, such a foolish idea, which a legislator must have attended to, could have no place. We shall find that Moses, throughout his laws, mani- fests even towards animals a spirit of justice and kind- ness, and inculcates the avoidance, not only of actual cruelty, but even of its appearance. A code of civil law does not, indeed, necessarily provide for the rights of ani- mals, because they are not citizens ; but still, the way in 'Which animals are treated, so strongly influences the man- ners and sentiments of a people even towards their fellow- creatures, (for he who habitually acts with cruelty and want of feeling to beasts, will soon become cruel and hard-heart- 'cd to men,) that a legislator will sometimes find it necessary ;to attend to it, to prevent his people from becoming savage. MiCHAELIS, Ver. 6. If a bird's-nest chance to be before thee in the way in any tree, or on the ground, whether they be young ones or eggs, and the dam sitting upon the young or upon the eggs, thou shalt not take the dam with the young, 7. But thou shalt in anywise let the dam go, , and take the young to thee ; that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest prolong thy days. It is the command of Moses, that if a person find a bird's-nest in the way, whether on a tree or on the ground, •though he may take the eggs, or the young, he shall not take the mother, but always allow her to escane. It is clear that he here speaks, not of those birds whicli nestle upon people's property; in other words, that he does not, for in- .'stance, prohibit an Israelite from totally destroying a spar- jrow's or a swallow's nest, that might happen to be trouble- jsome to him, or to extirpate to the utmost of his power the birds that infested his field or vineyard. He merely en- joins what one was to do on finding such nests on the v:mj, that is, loithout one's property : thus guarding against either the utter extinction, or too great diminution of any species of bird indigenous to the country. And this in some coun- jtries is still, with respect to partridges, an established rule ; which, without a special law, is observed by every real sportsman, and the breach of which subjects him to the re- proaches of his brethren. ]Nor would any further illustra- ^tion be necessary, if Moses spoke only of edible birds, and ^as if merely concerned for their preservation. But this is ,not the case. His expression is so general, that we must 'needs understand it of all birds whatever, even those that ;are most destructive, besides what are properly birds of |prey. And here many readers may think it strange, that i Moses should be represented as providing for the preser- vation of noxious birds; yet, in fact, nothing can be more conformable to legislative wisdom, especially on the intro- duction of colonies into a new country. To extirpate, or even to persecute, to too great an extent, any species of birds in such a country, from an idea, often too hastily en- tertained, of its being hostile to the interests of the inhabit- ants, is a measure of very doubtful policy. It ought, in general, to be considered as a part of Nature's bounty, be- stowed for some important purpose ; but what that is, we certainly discover too late, when it has been extirpated, and the evil consequences of that measure are begun to be felt. In this matter, the legislator should take a lesson from the naturalist. Linnagus, whom all will allow to be a perfect master in the science of natural history, has made the above remark in his Dissertation, entitled, Historia Naimralis cui Bono ? and gives two remarkable examples to confirm it : the one, in the case of the Little Crmo of Virginia, {Gracv^ la Quiscnla,) extirpated, at great expense, on account of its supposed destructive effects, and which the inhabitants would soon gladly have re-introduced at double expense; the other, in that of the Egyptian Vulture, orRacham, ( Vultur Percnopterus, Linn.) In the city of Cairo, every place is so full of dead carcasses, that the stench of them would not fail to produce putrid diseases; and where the caravans trav^el,. dead asses and camels are always lying. The liacham, which molests no living thing, consumes these carcasses, and clears the country of them ; and it even follows the track of the caravan to Mecca, for the same purpose : and so grate- ful are the people for theserviceit thusdoesthecountry,that devout and opulent Mohammedans are wont to establish foundations for its support, by providing for the expense of a certain number of beasts to be daily killed, and given every morning and evening to the immense flocks of Radiants that resort to the place where criminals are executed, and rid the city, as it would seem, of their carcasses in like man- ner. These eleemosjmary institutions, and the sacred re- gard shown to these birds by the Mohammedans, are like- wise testified by Dr. Shaw, in his Trave.'s. These exam- ples serve pretty strongly to show, that in respect, at least, to birds, we ought to place as much confidence in the wis- dom and kindness of Nature, as not rashly to extirpate any species which she has established in a country, as a great, and, perhaps, indispensable blessing. Limit its numbers we certainly may, if they incommode us ; but still so as that the race shall not become extinct. Of quadrupeds and insects I say nothing, because; with regard to them, we have not such experience to guide us. No inconvenience has arisen in England, nor even in th''- populous part of Ger- many between the Weser and the Oder, from the loss of the wolves ; although I cannot understand, but must leave it to naturalists to find out, how it should happen, that, in^ any country, beasts of prey can be extirpated with less in- convenience than birds ; wild cats, for instance, and to bring that parallel closer, than owls, both of which live upon mice 1 There are yet three peculiar circumstances to be noted, which would naturally make the Israelitish legislator singularly attentive to the preservation of birds. 1. He was conducting a colony of people into a coun- try with which they were unacquainted, and where they might very probably attempt to extirpate any species of bird that seemed troublesome, without adverting to its real importance ; just as the Virginian colonists did, in the case of their crow. 2. Palestine is situated in a climate producing poisonous snakes and scorpions, and between deserts and mountains, from which it would be inundated with those snakes, if the birds that lived on them were extirpated. 3. From the same deserts too, it would be overwhelmed with immense multitudes of locusts and mice, if it were des- titute of those birds, that resort thither to feed on them ; not to mention the formidable swarms of flies in the East, and particularly in Palestine, of which I have taken notice in my Dissertation on this law. — Michaelis. Ver. 8. When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thy house, if any man fall from thence. The roof is always flat, and often composed of branches of wood laid across rude beams, and to defend it from the injuries of the weather, to which it is peculiarly exposed 118 DEUTERONOMY Chap. 23. in the rainy season, it is covered with a stitmg plaster of terrace. It is surrounded by a wall breast high, which forms the partition with the contiguous houses, and pre- vents one from falling into the street on the one side, or into the court on the other. This answers to the battlements which Moses commanded the people of Israel to make for the roof of their houses, for the same reason. " When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battle- ment (npya) for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thy house, if any man fall from thence." Instead of the parapet wall, some terraces are guarded, like the galleries, with balustrades only, or latticed work. Of the same kind, probably, was the lattice or net, as the term (p22rff shebaca) seems to import, through which Ahaziah, the king of Samaria, fell down into the court. This incident proves the necessity of the law which Jehovah graciously dictated from Sinai, and furnishes a beautiful example of his naternal care and goodness ; for the terrace was a place where many offices of the family were performed, and bu- sine«:s of no little importance was occasionally transacted. Rahab concealed the spies on the roof, with the stalks of flux which she had laid in order to dry; the king of Israel, according to the custom of his country, rose from his bed, and walked upon the roof of his house, to enjoy the refresh- ing breezes of the evening; upon the top of the house, the prophet conversed with Saul, about the gracious designs of God, respecting him and his family; to the same place, Peter retired to offer up his devotions ; and in the feast of tabernacles, under the government of Nehemiah, booths were erected, as well upon the terraces of their houses, as in their courts, and in the streets of the city. In Judea, the inhabitants sleep upon the tops of their houses during the heats of summer, in arbours made of the branches of trees, or in tents of rushes. When Dr. Pococke was at Tiberias in Galilee, he was entertained by the sheik's steward, and with his company supped upon the lop of the house for coolness, according to their custom, and lodged there like- wise, in a sort of closet of about eight feet square, formed of wicker-work, plastered round towards the bottom, but v/ithout any door, each person having his cell. In like manner, the Persians take refuge during the day in sub- terraneous chambers, and pass the night on the flat roofs of their houses. — Paxton. We have repeated intimations in scripture, of a custom which would be extremely inconvenient in England ; — that of sleeping on the top Of the house, exposed to the open air, and sky: so we read, " Samuel came to call Saul about the spring of the day, not to — but on — the top of the house ; and communed with him on the house-top " So Solomon observes, " It is better to dwell in a corner on the house-top, than with a brawling Avoman in a wide street." The same idea may be noticed elsewhere. " It has ever t)een a custom with them, [the Arabs in the East,] equally connected with health and pleasure, to pass the nights in summer upon the house-tops, which for this very purpose are made flat, and divided from each other by walls. We found this wav of sleeping extremely agreeable ; as we thereby enjoyed the cool air, above the reach of gnats and vapours, without any other covering than the canopy of the heavens, which unavoidably presents itself in different pleasing forms, upon every interruption of rest, when si- lence and solitude strongly dispose the mind to contempla- tion." (Wood's Balbec, Introduction.) " I determined he should lodge in a kiosque, on the top of my house, where I Icept him till his exaltation to the patriarchate, which, after a long negotiation, my wife's brother obtained, for a pretty large sum of money, to be paid in new sequins." (Baron du Tott.) The propriety of the Mosaic precept (Deut. xxii. 8,) which orders a kind of balustrade, or parapet, to sur- round the roof, lest any man should fall from thence, is strongly enforced by this relation ; for, if we suppose a per- son to rise in the night, without being fully awake, he might easily kill himself by falling from the roof. Some- fhing of the kind appears in the history of Amaziah, 2 Kings i. 2. In several places scripture hints at grass gro jv ing on the house-tops, but which comes to nothing. The following quotation will show the nature of this : " In the morning the mastei of the house laid in a stock of earth; which was carried up, and spread evenly on the top v^r the house, which is flat. The whole roof is thus fo.mfd of mere earth, laid on, and rolled hard and flat. On t.bi- lop of every house is a large stone roller, for the purpose of hardening and flattening this layer of made soil, so that the rain may not penetrate : but upon this surface, as may be supposed, grass and weeds grow freely. It is to such grass that the Psalmist alludes, as useless' and bad." (Jowett's Christian Researches in Syria.) There is also mention of persons on the house-top hastily escaping from thence without entering the house to secure their properly — as if hastily awaked out of sleep, or, &c. by the clamours of an invading enemy.— Taylor in Calmet. Ver. 10. Thou shalt not plough with an ox and an ass together. Le Clerc and some others think that this text is to be ta- ken in a symbolical sense, and that intermarriages with pagans and unbelievers are forbidden by it, Maimonides and the Jewish rabbles are of opinion, that this prohibition was given in consequence of the ox being a clean, and the ass an unclean animal. But no other interpretation need be sought than that which arises from the humanity shown to animals in various parts of the Mosaic laws. The ass is lower than the ox, and when in a yoke together must bear the principal weight, and that in a very painful posi- tion of the neck ; his steps are unequal, and his strength is inferior, which must occasion an irregular draught, and great oppression to both. The ass is a stubborn, refractory, and, in these countries, a spirited creature ; the ox, on the contrary, is gentle, tractable, and patient : writers on agri- culture, therefore, have given the same precept as Moses ; and Calpurnius says generally, Ne pecora quidem jugo nisi paria succedant. — " Let no cattle be yoked together except they match." Cruel and unnatural'as this practice is, we may suppose it was not uncommon; for we find it alluded to in the Artlularia of Plautus, act i. s. 4. Old Euclio, addressing himself to Megadorus, says. Nunc si filiam locassem meam tibi, in mentem venit. Te bovem esse, et me esse asellum, ubi tecum conjunctus sim. " If I were to give my daughter to you, it occurs to me, that Avhen we had formed^ this alliance, I should be the ass, and you the ox." — BuRDERi In the sandy fields of Syria and Egypt, where deep ploughing, by draining off" the moisture necessary to vege- tation, would be hurtful, a single ass is occasioiially seen drawing the plough. The implement employed, is made to correspond with the strength of the animal ; it is so light, " that a man of moderate strength," says Dr. Russel, " may easily carry it with one hand ; a little cow, or at most two, and sometimes only an ass, is sufficient to draw it." But this is done only in very light soils ; where the ground is stiffer, and a deeper furrow required, two beasts are yoked together in one plough. In Syria, where the distinction between clean and unclean beasts did not exist, and where unnatural associations were disregarded, they very often joined an ox and an ass in the same yoke. But the law of Moses prohibited, by an express statute, such incongruous mixtures: " Thou shalt not plough with an ox and an ass together." The chosen people might employ them both iir tilling their ground ; but, in every instance, they were to be joined only with those of their own species. This pre- ■ cept embraced at once, the benefit of the tribes, and the comfort of their cattle. The benevolent legislator would not have animals of unequal strength, and of discordant habits and dispositions, forced into a union to which they are naturally averse, and where the labour could not be equally divided. But Jehovah, whose care extends to the happiness even of an ox or an ass, had certainly a higher, object in view. He meant, by this prohibition, to instruct his people to preserve, with solicitude, the unaffected sim- plicity of the patriarchal ages, in their manner of living ; to avoid unnatural associations among themselves, and un- due familiarity with the idolatrous nations around them, by contracting marriages with them, entering into alliances, or engaging in extensive mercantile transactions, still more, by joining in the impure rites of their worship. To this moral aspect of the law, the great apostle of the Gentiles evidently refers in his charge to the Corinthians: " Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers; for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness ? and what communion hath light with darkness," — Paxton, CHAPTER XXIII. Ver. 19. Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy Chap. 24. DEUTERONOMY. \\d. brother ; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury. 20. Unto a stranger thou may est lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury : that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thy hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it. See on Lev. 25. 26. Ver. 24. When thou comest into thy neighbour's vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes thy fill, at thine own pleasure ; but thou shah not put any in thy vessel. 25. When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thy hand; but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour's standing corn. If a man was passing along another's field, he was allow- ed to pluck ears of corn to eat, but forbidden to use the 1 sickle, Deut. xxiii. 25. This pretty much accords with :, what is common among ourselves ; for no owner of a field, ; unless he wishes to render himself ridiculous by his nig- gardliness, will hinder a passenger from plucking his ears of corn, and eating them. But the liberty of the stranger, by the Mosaic law, perhaps extended still further : for if the i)oor man had plucked up whole handfuls of ears, and I carried them off, I do not thence see how he could have been found punishable, or how it could have been prevent- ed. I do not take upon me absolutely to decide the point, because the law is very briefly expressed. I only remark, that this very law, which among us would be very unjust and pernicious, had quite another aspect among a people consisting entirely of husbandmen : for where every citi- 2en, or, in other words, every one belonging to the nation, has his own land, one will not be apt, from avarice, to tear up another's corn, because he must expect that his neigh- bour will retaliate in like manner upon his. It will, there- fore, most probably be only as he travels along, that he will eat a few ears for pleasure, and that may readily be allow- ed him. In the verse immediately preceding, (Deut. xxiii. 24,) Moses has an ordinance respecting vineyards, which may to us appear more singular, and to bear harder on their owners. The stranger that came into another's vineyard, was authorized to eat as many grapes as he pleased, only he might not carry any off in his basket, or other such ves- sel. To my illustration of this law, I must premise, that I am not a native of a wine country ; having been born at Halle, on the extreme verge of the wine district of Germa- ny, and where vineyards are so rare, that under such a law they could not possibly exist. In such a climate, every indi- vidual bunch of grapes is not indeed a rarity, (for that I can- not say of my native country,) but, at any rate, an article of sale, arid worth money. Perhaps, therefore, a native of a more southern region, where wine is produced in greater abundance, would be able to explain this part of the Mosaic law better, and would find it more agreeable to justice. But besides all that persons acquainted with wine countries could say, there is this additional circumstance here to be attended to, and which is quite inapplicable to all mir wine countries, viz. that every Israelite had his paternal land; and if he lived in a district where wine was grown, (which was the case in most parts of Palestine, the country being mountainous,) he probably had a vineyard of his own, as well as his neighbour. The right, therefore, to eat one's fill in another's vineyard, was, in most cases, merely a jm reciprocum : and thus I might with freedom satisfy my appetite, wherever I saw grapes before me ; single bunches being there no article of sale. This to travellers was a gratification always acceptable, and a piece of cour- tesy that cost the owners but little ; and to those who had no land, that is, to the poor, it was a sort of alms, or, at least, a comfort, that they could thus satisfy their appetite without being chargeable with theft, or injustice. If the owner of a vineyard found them too assiduous, or their visits too frequently repeated, there was nothing in the law that hindered him fr6m enclosing it, or turning them out. Only they could not be declared thieves, if they but plucked the grapes, and ate thftj) wjthin the vineyard. We shall frequently see, that the laws of Moses manifest a certain degree of indulgence and kmdnesstothe cravings of nature; which, far from wishing to lurture, they v/ould not even have exposed to any temptation, that might lead a man to theft. This is a point of great importance to the preserva- tion of the moral character of a people. Hunger, or ap- petite, often hurries a man of the most honourable princi- ples to devour grapes and other eatables that are not watched; if his conscience make this theft, the great boundary that distinguishes the man of honour from the thief, is in a manner overstepped, and if this happen often, he will at last become a thief in a higher sense, having lost all conscience and regard to character. It is, therefore, certainly better, if it can be done without any material in- jury to property, to allow him the liberty of eating a little of such things, in order to keep him a conscientious, hon- ourable man. Legislators sometimes attend but too little to moral niceties of this nature ; and yet it is possible there- by to corrupt a whole people, and rob them of their honesty. Moses, on the other hand, Avould give no sanction to the practice of free pasturage, although he gave his laws to a people sprung from wandering herdsmen, to whose cattle^ the whole country where they lived was a common ; and herein he is a most perfect antipode to our laws of indis- criminate pasturage, which prove so great a misfortune to Germany. Whoever drove his cattle into another's field or vineyard, and fed therein, was obliged to pay a grazing rent ; but whether for the whole year, or only for the pre- cise time of occupation, I am uncertain, Exod. xxii. How- ever favourable, therefore, he may have been to the poor, in authorizing them to pluck a few ears of corn, or to glean what was left in the fields, he by no means thought it just that, by any law of free pasturage, a man should be obstruct- ed in using his field as his own property solelv, and in turning it to the best account, even after harvest. Whoever has heard the complaints of economists against commons, which with us, without injustice to individuals, it is so diflicult to abolish, while yet they so eflfectually obstruct the full improvement of the fields, will perceive the importance and the wisdom of this law, the enforcing of which was P attended with no difl&culty after the conquest of a new country. — Michaelis, CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 10. When thou dost lend thy brother any thing, thou shalt not go into his house to fetch his pledge. 11. Thou shalt stand abroad, and the man to whom thou dost lend shall bring out the pledge abroad unto thee. 12. And if the man he poor, thou shalt not sleep with his pledge : 13. In any case thou shalt deliver him the pledge again when the sun goeth down, that he may sleep in his own raiment, and bless thee : and it shall be righteousness unto thee before the Lord thy God. Among the Israelites in the time of Moses, it must have been very common to lend on pledge — and that, according to the meaning of the word, in natural law, which allows the creditor, in the case of non-payment, to appropriate the pledge to his own behoof, without any authoritative inter- position of a magistrate, and to keep it just as rightfully as if it had been bought with the sum which has been lent for it, and which remains unpaid. But while pledges are un- der no judicial regulation, much extortion and villany may be practised, when the poor man who wishes to bor- row is in straits, and must of course submit to all the terms imposed by the opulent lender. This we know from daily experience: the persons who lend money extrajudicially. on pledge, being generally odious or contemptible usurers. Among a poor people, such as wq must suppose every people to be in their infancy, the evils of pledging are still more oppressive. The poor man often finds himself under a far greater necessity of borrowing, than we can easily imagine, because there is nothing to be earned; and the- husbandman, who has had a bad harvest, or his crop destroyed by hail, or locusts, must often borrow, not money, but bread, or else starve. In such cases, he will give in 120 DEUTERONOMY. Chap. 25. pledge, whatever the rich lender requires, however greatly it may be to his loss. Nor has he, like borrowers in our days, many articles which he can dispense with, and pledge ; such as superfluous apparel, numerous shirts, and changes of linen, household furniture, and various little luxuries, that are become fashionable among our poorest people ; but he must instantly surrender things of indispen- sable use and comfort, such as the clothes necessary to keep him warm, his implements of husbandry, his cattle, and (who could suppose it '?) his very children. Here the avaricious lender on pledge cannot but be most heartily detested, and incur the universal execration of the people. And hence, in the book of Job, whibh giv^s us some views of Arabian manners, such as they were a little before the departure of the Israelites from Egypt, when the picture of a villain is drawn, the author does not forget, as one trait of his character, to represent him as a lender upon fledge. Thus in chap. xxii. 6, xxiv. 7. He extorts fledges without having lent, (an act of extreme injusiice, which, however, may take place when the pledge is given, before the loan is paid down,) and makes his debtors go naked ; probably be- cause he has taken their most necessary clothes in pledge, and as unfeelingly as illegally detained them. — In chap, xxiv. 3. He takes the widow's ox for a fledge ; so that she cannot plough her land, to gain the needfuffor clearing off the debt; and the ox, thus pledged perhaps for a trifle, if it cannot be redeemed on the day of payment, becomes the certain property of the greedy creditor. But the poor widow thus loses ten times as much as he unjustly gains, unless he yet think fit to repair the injury done to her land ; for she can now no more cultivate it, and must be every day plunging deeper in debt and misery. — At ver. 9. He takes even the infant of the needy for a fledge, and, of course, if not duly redeemed, keeps it, for bond-service, however disproportioned to its value the loan may have been. Mo- ses by no means attempts to abolish the practice of extra- judicial pledging, or to make such regulations, as we have in our laws, whereby the pledge, under what agreement soever given, may be sold to the highest bidder, while of the price the creditor can only receive the real amount of his debt. These are inventions to be found only in the more elaborate laws of nations further advanced in opu- lence and refinement; and which, in the present situation of the Israelites, would have been impracticable and una- vailing. Indeed, among a people so poor, they must have proved detrimental, had it been possible to put them in practice: for no one would have been inclined to lend a trifle (and to a poor borrower even trifles are important) on pledge, under so many formalities, and when the way to arrive at payment, instead of being short and simple, was through the interference of a magistrate. In this way a needy person must always have found it diificult, if not impossible, to obtain a loan, particularly a small one: which, among a poor people, is just as great an evil, as can arise from fraudulent practices in pledging. It will not, therefore, be imputed to Moses as a fault, that his statutes contain not those legal refinements, which probably were not then invented, and which even yet may be said rather to be in record in our statute books, than to be in our prac- tice. They would have been dangerous to his people, and peculiarly oppressive to the poor. He let fledge remain m its proper sense, pledge ; and thus facilitated the obtain- ing of loans : satisfying himself with making laws against some of the chief abuses of pledging. — Michaelis. Ver. 13. In any case thou shalt deliver him the pledge again when the sun goeth down, that he may sleep in his own raiment, and bless thee : and it shall be righteousness unto thee before the Lord thy God. The Talmudists enumerate eighteen several garments, which belonged to the full dress of an ancient Jcav. A woollen shirt was worn next the skin, although some had shirts of linen in which they slept, because these were more cleanly and wholesome. But this part of their dress is to be distinguished from the caffetan or shirt, which the oridegroom and the bride sent to each other ; which they wore over their clothes at their solemn festivals ; and in which they were at last buried. Next to it was the coat, which reached to their feet, and was accounted a modest and honourable article of dress. This greatly aggravated the indignity which the king of Ammon offered to the am- bassadors of David, by cutting off their garments in the middle to their buttocks ; he insulted them b} spoiling the most esteemed part of their dress ; he exposed them tc shame, by uncovering their nakedness, as they seem to have worn no breeches under their upper garments. The tunic was the principal part of the Jewish dress ; it was made nearly in the form of our present shirt. A round hole was cut at top, merely to permit the head to pass through. Sometimes it had long sleeves, which reached down to the wrists; at other times short sleeves, which reached to the elbow ; some had very short sleeves, which reached only to the middle of the upper arm, and some had no sleeves at all. The tunic was nearly the same with the Roman stola ; and was, in general, girded round the waist, or under the breast, with the zona or girdle. Descending to the ground, and floating round the feet, it was, in the days of our Lord, a distinguishing badge of the prond Pharisee: " Beware of the scribes," said he, " who love to walk in long robes," in tunics at full length, and reaching to the ground. These coats were collared at the neck, and fringed at the bottom. Over the tunic they wore a blanket, which the Arabs call a hyke, and is the very same wiih the plaid of the Scotch Highlanders. These hykes are of dif- ferent sizes, and of different quality and fineness. They are commonly six yards long, and five or six feet broad ; serving the Kabyle and Arab for a complete dress in the day ; and " as they sleep in raiment," like the Israelites of old, it serves likewise for their bed and covering by night. It is a loose but troublesome garment, frequently discom- posed, and falling upon the ground ; so that the person who wears it, is every moment obliged to tuck it up, and fold il anew about his body. This shows the great use of a girdle whenever they are concerned in any active employment, and by consequence the force of the scripture injunction, alluding to that part of the dress, to have our loins girded, in order to set about it with any reasonable prospect of success. The method of wearing these garments, and the use they are put to at other times in serving as coverlets to * their beds, should induce us to take the finer sorts of them, at least such a&are worn by the ladies and persons of dis- tinction, to be the fsflus of" primitive times. Ruth's veil, which held six measures of barley, might be of a similar fashion, and have served, upon extraordinary occasions, for the same use ; as were also the clothes, or upper gar- ments, worn by the Israelites, in which they folded up their kneading troughs, as the Arabs and others do to this day, things of similar burden and encumbrance, in their hykes. It is very probable, likewise, that the loose folding garment, the toga of the Romans, was of this kind ; for il we may form our opinion from the drapery of their statues, this is no other than the dress of the Arabs, when they ap- pear in their hykes. — Paxton. CHAPTER XXV. Ver. 4. Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn. The custom of thrashing com by the trampling of bul- locks, still prevails in the East. The floor is made in the open air, of cows' dung and clay. In its centre a post is driven into the ground, and the corn is placed in order around it; and the bullocks, being fastened to the post, begin to move in the circle, enjoying themselves, as they work, by eating the corn. — Roberts. This statute, which has been seldom sufliciently under- stood, establishes, in the first place, certain rights, as belong- ing even to the beasts which man uses for the purpose of labour. We must not here think of our mode of thrashing, but on that used in the East, where the corn being laid o'n the thrashing-floor, is trodden out by oxen or asses, or by thrashing-wagons and thrashing-planks drawn over it by oxen. Here, then, Moses commands that no muzzle be put on the ox, but that he be allowed, as long as he is employed in thrashing, to eat both of the grain and straw. It appeans that an ancient consuetudinary usage which Moses adopted in his written law, had established this as nothins: more than equitable; for we find it still observed in places of the East, where the Mosaic law is not in force ; as, for in- stance, according to Dr. Russel's testimony, at Aleppo, among the Arabs that dwell in that neighbourhood ; anc Chap. 25, DEUTERONOMY. 121 likewise, even among the inhabitants of the coast of Mala- bar. Russell, in his Natural History of Aleppo, says, that there beef is pretty good at all seasons, but particularly ex- cellent in summer, because, to this day, the inhabitants sacredly adhere to the ancient custom of allowing the ox, while thrashing, to eat as much as he chooses. In the pe- riodical accounts of the INIalabar mission, we are told that they have a proverb to this effect, " What an ox thrashes, is his profit." The people of the most ancient ages, in gen- eral, gave the ox a high preference above other beasts, on account of his great and indispensable usefulness in agri- culture, and conferred upon him, as man's assistant, many privileges, insomuch that mythology speaks of a time when it was unlawful to kill him. T believe, however, that the statute before us does not extend to oxen only, but includes also other beasts employed by man in thrashing ; for Moses is wont to represent general principles, by particular and well-known examples. This point, however, is too incon- siderable to occupy more room in its illustration, else might I quote Isa. xxx. 24, in proof that the ass had the same right as the ox ; for as to the horse, he was not then used in hus- bandry. The origin of this benevolent law with regard to beasts, is seemingly deducible from certain moral feelings or sen- timents prevalent among the people of the early ages. They thought it hard that a person should be employed in the collection and preparation of edible and savoury things, and have them continually before his eyes, without being once permitted to taste them ; and there is in fact a degree of cruelty in placing a person in such a situation; for the sight of suchdamties is tormenting, and the desire to partake of them increases with the risk of the prohibition. If any of my readers has a heart so devoid of sensibility towards the feelings of his inferiors, that he can form no idea of any thing torturous in such circumstances, let him endeavour to recollect from the heathen mythology, the representations which the Greek and Roman poets gave of the torments of hell; such as tables spread with the most costly dainties, and placed before the eyes of the damned, without their be- ing permitted so much as to touch them; or again, the water in which thirsty Tantalus was immersed to his lips, and which fled from him whenever he bowed to taste it. Add to this, that by prohibitions of this nature, the moral char- acter of servants and day-labourers, to the certain injury of their master's interest, seldom fails to become corrupted ; for the provocation of appetite at the sight of forbidden grat- ification will, with the greater number, undoubtedly over- power all moral suggestions as to right and wrong. They will learn to help themselves without leave, that is, in other words, (for although not in civil, yet in moral law, it is theft,) they will learn to steal ; and if the attempt is frequent- ly repeated, the wall of partition between right and wrong, which was at first so formidable to conscience, is at length broken through : they soon learn to go greater and greater lengths, and thus in this school are bred arrant thieves. Our laws, it is true, pay no attention to such things ; but still, the voice of nature, if we will but listen to it, will teach us, that in evei'y country, servants imagine, that to steal eatables is no crime ; or, as the saying is in Upper Saxony, that " what goes into the mouth, brings no sin with it." Here they are certainly quite in the wrong : and among a people that had already a taste for foreign and expensive luxuries, such a benevolent law as that now under consid- eration, could not be introduced, without the complete de- struction of domestic economy ; although indeed, after all, cooks and butlers cannot well be prohibited from tasting the dishes and the wine of which they have the charge. But without dwelling on what our modern luxury renders necessary in this matter, I only say, that to the people of the East, in those times of ancient simplicity, it appeared very cruel to debar a slave or a hireling from tasting of the food which he had under his hand. When Job wishes to describe a perfect monster of insensibility and hardhearted- ness, he says, " The hungry carry his sheaves ; immured in workhouses they prepare his oil ; they tread his wine- presses, and yet they thirst." Job xxiv. 10, 11. I seldom appeal to Jewish testimonies, or, to speak more accurately, to the Talmud and Rabbins, because they are too recent for illustration of the Mosaic statutes ; but here I cannot altogether overlook the following Jewish doctrine, laid down in the BoM Mezia, fol. 83. " The workman may law- fully eat of what he works among ; in the vintage he may 16 eat of grapes ; when gathering figs, he may partake of them; and in harvest he may eat of the ears of corn. Of gourds and dates he may eat the value of a denarius ;" that is, of four groschen, or one fourth of a florin. The mention of this specific sum, which was, perhaps, rather too great an allowance, seems to have proceeded from the circumstance of the Jews reckoning a denarius the price of a day's la- bour, because it was introduced so lately before the destruc- tion of Jerusalem. I quote the passage, however, not for proof, but merely as a relic of ancient manners among the Jews. This kindness, then, the Hebrews and Arabs extended unto oxen, to which, by reason of their great utility in agri- culture, they conceived that they were bound to manliest a certain degree of gratitude. And therefore when Moses, in terms of this benevolent custom ordained, that the ox was not to be muzzled while thrashing, it would seem that it was not merely his intention to provide for the welfare of that animal, but to enjoin with the greater force and effect, that a similar right should be allowed to human labourers, whether hirelings or slaves. He specified the ox, as the lowest example, and what held good in reference to him, was to be considered as so much the more obligatory in reference to man. That he wished to be understood in this way, we have the less reason to doubt, from this con- sideration, that in the sequel we shall meet with other stat- utes, in which he carries his attention to the calls of hunger so far, as to allow the eating of fruits and grapes in other people's gardens and vineyards, without restraint. It would appear, therefore, that not only servants, but also day-la- bourers, might eat of the fruits they gathered, and drink of the must which they pressed. The wages of the latter seems to have been given them over and above their meat, and, in consideration of this privilege, to have been so much the less ; for with a labourer, who found his own victuals, and yet had the right of eating and drinking of whatever came under his hands, a master would have stood on a very disadvantageous footing. In fact, if they did not aflford food to day-labourers, it would be impossible to understand how the value of a servant could be compared with the hire of a labourer, Deut. xv. 18, and found double ; for that a master maintained his servants, is unquestionable. But it they likewise gave the labourer his victuals, the value of a servant, and the wages of a labourer, might be compared. — MiCHAELIS. Ver. 9. Then shall his brother's wife come onto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot, anSf spit in his face, and shall answer and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house. The last mark of disrespect, which is by no means con- fined to the East, is to spit in the face of another. Chardin observes, that spitting before any one, or spitting upon the ground in speaking of any one's actions, is, through the East, an expression of extreme detestation. It is, there- fore, prescribed by the law of Moses, as a mark of great disgrace to be fixed on the man who failed in his duty to the house of his brother. To such contemptuous treat- ment, it will be recollected, our blessed Redeemer sub- mitted in the hall of the high-priest, for the sake of his people. The practice has descended to modem times ; for m the year 1744, when a rebel prisoner was brought before Nadir Shah's general, the soldiers were ordered to spit in his face ; which proves that the savage conduct of the Jews corresponded with a custom which had been long establish- ed over all the East. — Paxton. Ver. 13. Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small. The prophet Micah also speaks of "the bag of deceitful weights." As in former times, so now, much of the busi- ness in the East is transacted by travelling merchants. Hence all kinds of spices, and other articles, are taken from one village to another by the Moors, Avho are in those regions, what the Jews are in "the West. The pedler comes to your door, and vociferates the names of his wares ; and, so soon as he catches your eye, begins to exhibit bis very m DEUTERONOMl^. Chap. 27. cheap, and valuable articles. Have you agreed as to the price, he then produces the bag of " divers weights," and after fumbling some time in it, he draws forth the weight by wliich he has to sell; but, should he have to purchase any thing of you, he will select a heavier weight. The man who is not cheated by this trader, and his " bag of divers weights," must be blessed with more keenness than most of his fellows.— Roberts, CHAPTER XXVIL Ver. 2. And it shall be, on the day when you shall pass over Jordan unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, that thou shalt set thee up great stones, and plaster them with plaster: 3. And thou shalt write upon them 7, all the words of this law, when thou art passed over, that thou mayest go in unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, a land that flovveth with milk and honey; as the Lord God of thy fathers hath promised thee. The book of the law, in order to render it the more sa- cred, was deposited beside the ark of the covenant, Deut. xxxi. 26; and we find the same procedure likewise ob- served afterward with regard to other laws, such as that which was made on the first establishment of regal author- ity, or, in other words, the compact between the king and the estates, 1 Sam. x. 26 ; but I cannot precisely determine whether that was kept in the holy of holies beside the ark, or only in the holy place. The guardians of the law, to whom" was intrusted the duty of making faithful transcripts of it, were the priests, Deut. xxvii. 19. But Moses did not account even this precaution suflicient for the due preser- vation of his law in its original purity ; for he commanded that it should besides be engraven on stones, and these stones kept on a mountain near Sichem, in order that a genuine exemplar of it might be transmitted even to the latest generations, Deut. xxvii. 1 — 8. In his ordinance for this purpose, there are one or two particulars that require illustration. He commanded that the stones should be coated with lime ; but this command would have been quite absurd had his meaning only been, that the laws should be cut through this coating ; for after this unnecessary trou- ble, they could by no means have been thus perpetuated with such certainty, nor have nearly so long resisted the effects of wind and weather, as if at once engraven in the stones themselves. K^nicott, in his Second Dissertation on the printed, Hebrew Text, p. 77, supposes that they might have been cut out in black marble, with the letters raised, and the hollow intervals between the black letters filled up with a body of white lime, to render them more distinct and conspicuous. But even this would not have been a good plan for eternizing them: because lime cannot long withstand the weather, and whenever it began to fall off in any particular place, the raised characters would, by a variety of accidents, to which writing deeply engraved is not liable, soon be injured, and become illegible. No one that wishes to write any thing in stone, that shall descend to the most remote periods of time, will ever think of giving a preference to characters thus in relief. And besides, Moses, if this was his meaning, has expressed himself very indistinctly ; for he says not a word of the colour of the stone, on which, however, the whole idea turns. I rather suppose, therefore, that Moses acted in thisniatter with the same view to future ages, as is related of Sostratus, the ar- chitect of the Pharos, who, while he cut the name of the then king of Egypt in the outer coat of lime, took care to engrave his own name secretly in the stone below, in order that it might come to light in after times, when the plaster with the king's name should have fallen off. In like man- ner, Moses, in my opinion, commanded that his laws should be cut in the stones themselves, and these coated with a thick crust of lime, that the engraving might continue for many ages secure from all the injuries of the weather and atmosphere, and then, when by the decay of its covering it should, after hundreds or thousands of years, first come to light, serve to show to the latest posterity whether they had suffered any chang:e. And was not the idea of thus pre- serving an inscription, not merely for hundreds, but for thousands of years, a conception evceedingly sublime 1 It is by no means impossible that these stones, if again di&- covered, might be found still to contain the whole engra- ving perfectly legible. Let us only figure to ourselves what must have happened to them amid the successive :levas- tations of the country in which they were erected. The lime would gradually become irregularly covered with moss' and earth ; and now, perhaps, the stones, by the soil increasing around and over them, many resemble a little mount; and were they accidentally disclosed to our view, and the lime cleared away, all that was inscribed on them 3500 years ago would at once become visible. Probably, however, ;his discovery, highly desirable though it would be both to literature and religion, being in the present state of things, and particularly of the Mosaic law, now so long abrogated, not indispensably necessary, it is reserved for some future age of the w-orld. What Moses commanded, merely out of legislative prudence, and for the sake of his laws, as laws, God, who sent him, may have destined to answer likewise another purpose ; and may choose to bring these stones to light at a time when the laws of Moses are no longer of any authority in any community whatever. Thus much is certain, that nowhere in the Bible, is any mention made of the discovery of these stones, nor indeed any further notice taken of them, than in Josh. viii. 30 — 35, where their erection is described ; so that we may hope they will yet be one day discovered. Moses' whole procedure in this matter, is precisely in the style of ancient nations, who generally took the precaution, now rendered unneces- sary by the invention of printing, to engrave their laws in stones; only that he studied, by a new contrivance, to give to his stony archives a higher degree of durability than was ever thought of by any other legislator. What was to be inscribed on the stones, whether the whole Pentateuch, or only the book of Deuteronomy, or but the blessings and curses pronounced in Deut. chap, xxvii, or merely the ten commandments alone, has been the subject of a controver- sy, for particulars concerning which, I again refer the reader to Kennicott's Second Dissertation. In my judg- ment, the expression, all the words of this law, implies, at least, that all the statutory part of the Mosaic books was to be engraved on the stones, which is far from being impos- sible, if we make but a distinction between the stones and the altar, which must, no doubt, have been too small for that purpose. It is well known that iij very ancient times, nations were wont to engrave their laws in stones ; and the Egyptians had recourse to stone pillars (o-rr/Auts) for perpetuating their discoveries in science, and the history of their country. All these circumstances considered, to- gether with this above all, that the Israelites had just come out of Egypt, where writing in stone was employed for so many further purposes, (although, indeed, hieroglyphic characters were used which Moses prohibited, because, when not understood, they might give a handle to idolatry,\ I do not see why the phrase, all tJie words of thislaw, should not be left in its full force, nor what should oblige us to limit it, with Dr. Kennicott, merely to the decalogue.— MiCHAELIS. Ver. 15. Cursed he the man that maketh any graven or molten image, an "abomination unto the Lord, the work of the hands of the crafts- man, and putteth it in a secret place. And all the people shall answer and say, Amen. The images of the Hindoos are generally made of cop- per or stone, but some are of silver or gold. It is not easy to find out the difference betwixt the gravenund molten im- age, except the firsi mean that which has been produced by the chisel from stone, and the second that which has been cast in a mould by the action of fire. These images, however, have all of them to be graven, or filed, before they are consecrated. — Roberts, Ver. 17. Cursed he he that remoyeth his neigh- bour's land-mark : and all the people shall say, Amen. Fields in the East have not fences or hedges, as in Eng- land, but a rid2:e, a stone, or a post; and, consequently, it is not very difficult to encroach on the property of another Should a man not be very careful, his neighbour will take Chap. 28, 29. DEUTERONOMY. 123 away a liltle every year, and keep pushing his ridge into the "other's ground. Disputes of the most serious nature ofien occur on this account, and call for the greatest dili- gence and activity of the authorities. An injured man re- peats to his aggressor the proverb, " The serpent shall bite iuiu who steps over the ridge," i. e. he who goes beyond. the landmark. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXVIII. Ver. 5. Blessed shall he thy basket and thy store. Ileb. " dough or I'neading- trough." Eastern farmers have large baskets made of Palmirah leaves, or other materials, foi the purpose of keeping their grain: they will contain 1 rom one hundred to one hundred and fifty parrahs. These buckets, then, were to be blessed ; they were not to be injur- ed by animals, nor robbed by man. But corn is also kept ill a store which is made of sticks and clay, in a circular I'orm. This little building is always elevated, to keep the H-rain from the damp, and is situated near to the house. When beggars have been relieved, they often say, " Ah ! may the place where you make ready your food ever be blessed." "May the rice-pot ever prosper." Thus, that which corresponds with the " kneading-trough" of the He- biews, has also its benediction. — Roberts. Hasselquist informs us, that baskets made of the leaves of the palm-tree are used by the people of the East on jour- neys, and in their houses. Harmer conjectures that such baskets are referred to in these words, and that the store >iit,mifies their leathern bags, in both which they used to carry things in travelling. — Burder. Ver. 13. And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail ; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath ; if that thou hearken unto the commandments of the Lord thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them. The prophet Isaiah, chap. ix. 14, says, " The Lord will cut off from Israel head and tail :" meaning, no doubt, those who were high,, and those who were low. It is amusing to hear men of rank in the East speak of their dependants as tails. Has a servant not obeyed his master, the former asks, " Who are you 1 are you the head or tail 1" Should a person begin to partake of food before those of high caste, it is asked, " What! is the tail to begin to wag be- fore the head V A husband, when angry with his wife, . inquires, " What are you 1 are you the head or the tail 1" , -Roberts. *" Ver. 24. The Lord shall make the rain of thy land powder and dust: from heaven shall it come down upon thee, until thou be destroyed. It may be of use to inquire a little into the nature and properties of such a kind of rain ; in which the following extracts may assist us. " Sometimes there [in India] the wind blows very high in those hot and dry seasons— rais- ing up into the air a very great height, thick clouds of dust and sand. . . .These dry showers most grievously annoy all those among whom they fall ; enough to smite them all with a present blindness ; filling their eyes, ears, nostrils ; and their mouths are not free, if they be not also well guarded : searching every place, as well within, as without, our tents or houses ; so that, there is not a little keyhole of any trunk, or cabinet, if it be not covered, but receives some of that dust into it; the dust forced to find a- lodging anywhere, everywhere, being so driven and forced as it is by the ex- treme violence of the wind." (Sir T. Roe's Embassy.) To the same purpose speaks Herbert. " And now the danger is past, let me tell you, most part of the last night we crossed over an inhospitable sandy desert, where here and there we beheld the ground covered with a loose and flying sand, which by the fury of the winter weather is accumulated in- to such heaps, as upon any great wind the track is lost ; and passengers (too ofc) overwhelmed and stifled; yea, camels, norses, mules, and other beasts, though strong, swift, and .steady in their going, are no' able to shift for themselves, but perish without recovery : those rolling sands, when agita- ted by the winds, move and remove more like sea than land, and render the way very dreadful to passengers. Indeed in Ihis place I thought that curse fulfilled, (Dent, xxviii. 24,) where the Lord, by Moses, threatens instead of rain to give showers of dust." These instances are in Persia: but such storms might ha known to the Israelites ; as, no doubt, they occur, also, on the sandy deserts of Arabia, east of Judea : and to this agrees Toumefort, who men- tions the same thing — " At Ghetsci there arose a lem];est of sand : in the same mangier as it happens sometimes i7i Arabia, and in Egypt, especially in the spring. It was raised by a very hot south wind, which drove so much sand, that one of the gates of the Caravansary was half stopped up with it ; and the way could not be found, being covered over, above a foot deep, the sand lying on all hands. This sand was extremely fine, and salt ; and was very troublesome to our eyes, even in the Caravansary, where all our baggage was covered over with it. The storm lasted from noon to sunset; and it was so very hot the night following, without, any wind, that one could hardly fetch breath, which in my opinion was partly occasioned by the reflection of the hot sand. Next day I felt a great pain in one eye, which made it smart, as if salt had been melted into it," &c. This may give us, a lively idea of the penetrating powers of the dust of the land of Egypt ; which (Exod. viii. 16) was converted into lice : — also, chap. ix. 8, of the effect of the ashes of the furnace, which Moses took, and sprinkled " up towards heaven, and it became a bile, breaking forth in blains upon man and beast." — Taylor in Calmet. Ver. 27. The Lord will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods, and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed. This is a complaint which is far more common, and more formidable in the East, than in England. Those who live on bad food, or reside in the vicinity of a swamp, are the most subject to it. See the poor object with a small piece of cloth round his loins, a staff* in his hand, his body " from the sole of his foot unto his crown" literally cover- ed with sores, an imploring piteous look, a weak tremu- lous voice, and bowing to the earth to excite your charity. — Roberts. Ver. 39. Thou shalt plant vineyards, and dress them, but shalt neither drink of the wine, nor gather the grapes; for the worms shall eat them. This threatening has often been fulfilled to the great disappointment and injury of the inhabitants of those coun- tries where wine is produced or consumed. An insect, called the vine weevil, which is a small beautiful beetle, is extremely hurtful to the vines. The caterpillar, which mines or cuts the leaves of the vine, has no feet ; and yet, by a singular expedient, can make a progressive motion in all positions, and even over the smoothest and most polished bodies. It advances its body out of its oval pod, (constructed of the two outer skins of a vine leaf,) forms a kind of hil- lock of silk, and, by means of a thread which attaches it to it, draws its pod or case to the hillock. It continually re- peats the same operation, and in this (laborious) manner advances pros:ressively. The traces of its progress are maiked by hillocks of silk at the distance of half a line from each other. Its food is the parenchyma or pith of the vine leaf, between the two epidermes, of which it eats out its oval habitation or pod. When it is taken out of its habita- tion, it never attempts to make a new one : it writhes about very much, but can make no progressive motion; and after having overspread the place in which it is with threads of silk, in an irregular manner, it dies at the end of twenty- four hours. — Burder. CHAPTER XXIX. Ver. 23. And that the whole land thereof is brim- stone, and salt, and burning. When a place is noted for being unhealthy, or the land very unfruitful, it is called a kenthaga poomy, a place or country of brimstone. Trincomalee, and some other pla- 124 DEUTERONOMY. Chap. 30—32. ces, have gained this appellation on account of the heat and sterility of the soils. — Roberts. The effect of salt, where it abounds, on vegetation, is de- scribed by burning. '* Thus Volney, speaking of the borders of the Asphaltic Lake, or Dead Sea, says, " the true cause of the absence of vegetables and animals, is the acrid salt- ness of its waters, which is infinitely greater than that of the sea. The land surrounding the lake being equally im- pregnated with that saltness, refuses to produce plants ; the air itself, which is by evaporation loaded with it, and which moreover receives vapours of sulphur and bitumen, cannot suit vegetation; whence the dead appearance which reigns around the lake." Hence the ancient custom of sowing an enemy's city, when taken, with salt, in token of perpetual desolation. Judges ix. 45. And thus in aftertimes, the city of Milan was burnt, razed, sown with salt, and plough- ed, by the exasperated emperor Frederick Barbarossa. — Border. f CHAPTER XXX. Ver. 14. But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, th^at thou mayest do it. "Z^ca a person pretend that he cannot understand an- other, that he must make additional inquiries, it will be said, "Do you not understand! In thy mouth are the words." Should a child at school be troublesome to the mas- ter, he will peevishly exclaim. In thy mouth are the words; meaning the inquiry was unnecessary, that the subject was well understood. — Roberts. Ver. 19. I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing : therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live. In solemn oaths, people point to the clouds, to the earth, to the grass, to the herbs, to the trees, as witnesses to the truth of what they have said. " O ye clouds above ! have I not said the truth 1 Ah ! well do you know it : speak to this, unbeliever." " Ah ! these trees can bear testimony to my veracity." When mariners are at sea, they appeal to it, or to Varuna the god. In storms, they say to the water, " O mother ! be calm." — Roberts. CHAPTER XXXII. * Ver. 2. My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distil as the dew; as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showers upon the grass. Oriental writers often speak of beautiful language as dropping upon the hearers. The Hebrew has for " proph- esy," in Micah ii. 6, " drop." The same word is used for drops of rain, for tears, or for the dew dropping from flowers. When a man has received consolation from an- other, he says, " His words were like rain upon the scorch- ed corn." Of a beautiful speaker, and an appropriate sub- ject, " Ah ! his speech is like the honey rain, upon the pan- dal bower of sugar." — Roberts. Ver. 5. Their spot is not the spot of his children. There may be here an allusion to the marks which the worshippers of particular idols had on different parts of their bodies, particularly on their foreheads. The differ- ent sects of idolaters in the East are distinguished by their sectarian marks, the stigma of their respective idols. These sectarian marks, particularly on the forehead, amount to nearly one hundred among the Hindoos, and es- pecially among the two sects, the worshippers of Siva and the worshippers of Vishnoo. In many cases these marks are renewed daily; for they account it irreligious to perform any sacred rite to their god without his mark on the forehead. The marks are generally horizontal and perpendicular lines, crescents, circles, leaves, eyes, (Sr.c. in red, black, white, and yellow. It is pleasing to see the Hindoos every morning perform their ablutions in the sa- cred lakes, and offer an innocent sacrifice under the solemn grove. After having gone through their religii^as cere- monies, they are sealed by the officiating Bramin with the mark either of Vishnoo or Siva, the followers of whom respectively form the two great sects among the Hindoos. The mark is impressed on the forehead with a composition of sandal-wood dust and oil, or the ashes of cow-dung and turmeric : this is a holy ceremony, which has been adopted in all ages by the eastern nations, however differing in re- ligious profession. — Forbes. Ver. 10. He found him in a desert land, and in the waste howling wilderness; he led him about, he instructed him, he kept him as the apple of his eye. Where the wild beasts are, is called the place of howl- ing. Thus relations, when their friends are on a journey, say, " Ah ! they are noAv in the place of howling." " My friend, go not through the howling desert." Precious things are spoken of as being the apple of the eye. Affec- tionate husbands say to their wives, " En Jean mulli," i. e. " apple of my eye." Of a beloved child, in relation to his parents, it is said, " He is the apple of their eye." — Rob- erts. Ver. 11. As an eagle stirreth up her nest, fiut- tereth over her young, spreadeth abroad her wings, taketh them, beareth them on her wings. It is pretended by some writers, that when the eaglets are somewhat grown, the mother kills the weakest or the most voracious of them ; but were the fact admitted, it is no satisfactory proof that she is without natural affection. It is well known that several animals of the mildest dispo- sitions forsake their young, when they find it impossible to provide for their subsistence. The parent eagles, says Buffon,not having sufficient for themselves, seek to reduce their family ; and as soon as the young ones are strong enough to fly and provide for themselves, they chase them from the nest, and never permit them to return. The ac- count of this celebrated naturalist so far agrees M"ith the statement of the sacred writer; according to whom, the eagle stirreth up her nest, that is, rouses her young from their sloth and inactivity, and provokes them to try their wings by fluttering about her nest. When she sees them indiffer- ent to her admonitions, or afraid to follow her example, " she spreadeth abroad her wings ; taketh them, and bear- eth them upon her wings." The remarkable circumstance of bearing them upon her wings, is alluded to in another part of scripture : " Ye have seen," said Jehovah to Israel, • " what I did unto Egypt, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself" Many passages in the writings of ancient authors countenance the idea, that the eagle actually takes up her timid young ones, and bears them on her wings till they venture to fly. jElian says, that when Tilgamus, a Babylonian boy, fell from the top of a tower, before he reached the ground, an eagle received and bore him up on her back. A similar story is recorded in the writings of Pausanias, who tells us, that an eagle flew under Aristimenes, who was cast by the Lacedemo- nians from the top of a tower, and carried him on her wings till he reached the ground in safety. These stories, although the mere creatures of imagination, show that the idea cf . the eagle bearing a considerable weight on her wings, was familiar to the ancients. It is not to be supposed, that she wafts her unfledged young through the void of heaven, or to distant places; the meaning probably is, that she aids with her wings their feeble and imperfect attempts to fly, till, imboldened by her example, and their own success, they fearlessly commit themselves to the air. So did Jeho- vah for his chosen people : when they w^re slumbering in Goshen, or groaning in despair of recovering their free- dom, he sent liis servant Moses to rouse them from their inglorious sloth, to assert their liberty, and to break their chains upon the heads of their oppressors. He carried them out of Egypt, and led them through the wilderness into their promised inheritance. He tanght them to know their strength : he instructed them in the art of war; he led them to battle, and by his almighty arm routed their enemies. — Paxton. Chap. 32—34. DEUTERONOMY. 125 Ver. 13. He made him ride on the high places of the earth, that he might eat the increase of the fields ; and he made him to suck honey out of the rock, and oil out of the flinty rock. This must mean the procuring of it from the olive-trees growing there. Maundrell, speaking of the ancient fertil- ity and cultivation of Judea, says, " the most rocky parts of all, which could not well be adjusted for the production of corn, might yet serve for the plantation of vines and olive-trees, which delight to extract, the one its fatness, the other its sprightly juice, chiefly out of such dry and flinty places."--- BuRDER. In Africa the bees deposits their honey on the trunks of trees and on rocks. Trees in some countries being scarce, the honey in most parts is found upon the front of rocks or cliffs, plastered on the outside, having a covering of wax to protect it from intruders. This outside coating, after a short exposure to the weather, assumes nearly the same colour as the rock, which, at a little distance, cannot easily be distinguished from the rock, so that a person making an incision with a knife, and putting his mouth to it to suck it, were a person a little way off" to notice some of the honey dropping from his chin, would believe that he saw a man sucking honey from a rock ; so that the scripture method of ex:pressing it is very beautiful. — African Light. Ver. 15. But Jeshu run waxed fat, and kicked: thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered with fat?iess ; then he forsook God which made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation. This does not appear to mean that Jeshurun had become fat in person, but fat or proud in spirit. Thus, of people who have risen from obscurity, and who conduct them- selves proudly, it is said, " They have become fat." To hear, " how fat that man is now," might lead a stranger to suppose it was meant so literally ; whereas the individual alluded to may be as meagre as one of Pharaoh's lean cattle. — Roberts. Ver. 25. Thy shoes shall be iron and brass. The Hebrew word here translated slioes, signifies bolts. The proper translation of this word is, thy bolts shall be iron and brass : that is, thy cities must be strong and secure against your enemies. To understand the force of these words, \ve must knoM' that in the East, and even in modern times, the locks and bolts of houses, and even of city gates, were of wood. " Their doors and houses," says Rauwolff", " are mostly closed with wooden bolts, which are hollow within; to open which they have wooden keys, which are a span long, and a thumb thick, and have on one side, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, &c. short nails or strong wires, so placed as to catch in others that fit into them, and thus move the bolt back- ward and forward." Thevenot observes, " all their locks and keys are made of wood; they have none of iron, not even those of the city gates, which are, therefore, also opened walhout keys." He describes the keys like Rau- wolff, and adds, that the door may be opened without the kej, by smearing the finger with clay. — Rosenmuller. CHAPTER XXXIII. Ver. 22. And of Dan he said, Dan is a lion's whelp ; he shall leap from Bashan. Although the lion fearlessly meets his antagonist in the open field, in this respect diflfering from leopards and some other beasts of prey, that never openly attack the fated vic- tim, yet this bold and noble animal often descends to strat- agem and ambuscade : " He couches in his den, and abides in the covert to lie in wait." He ws.tches thi- approach of his victim with cautious attention, carefully avoiding the least noise, lest he should give warning of his presence and designs. Such has the glowing pencil of David painted the insidious conduct of the murderer : " He lieth in wait secretly as a lion in his den : he lieth in wait to catch the poor — ^^he croucheth and humbleth himself, t^iaX the poor may fall by his strong ones." " Like as a lion t.iat is greedy of his prey, and as it were a young lien lurking in secret places." From his lurking-place, he commonly leaps upon the victim at one spring. So, in the farewell prediction of Moses, it is foretold, " Dan is a lion's whelp, he shall leap from Bashan." This fact is attested by all the ancient historians : Aristotle asserts, that when the Hon judges him- self within reach, he throws himself upon his prey; Pliny says, he leaps with a bound ; and Solinus, when he is in full pursuit, he springs forward upon thfe game. When he leaps on his prey, says Buffbn, he makes a spring of twelve or fifteen feet. In the same manner acted Dan-, proceeding, as it were, by a single bound, from the one extremity of Canaan to the other, he invaded the city of Laish, which, after its reduction, he called by his own name. — Paxton. Ver. 24. And of Asher he said. Let Asher be blessed with children ; let him be acceptable to his brethren, and let him dip his foot in oil. The juice of the grape, it is well known, is expressed in the East by treading, an operation which Dr. Chandler had an opportunity of seeing near Smyrna. Black grapes were spread on the ground in beds, and exposed to the sun to dry for raisins ; while in another part, the juice was ex- pressed for wine, a man with feet and legs bare, treading the fruit in a kind of cistern, with a hole or vent near the bottom, and a vessel beneath it to receive the liquor. When a few clusters of grapes are to be squeezed, it may be done commodiously enough by the hand ; in this Avay, Pharaoh's butler supposed he took the grapes and pressed them into his master's cup. This, it is true, was only a visionary scene, but we must suppose it was agreeable to the custom of the country. But when a large quantity of juice was required, the grapes were subjected in the wine-press to the feet of a treader. Oil of olives was expressed in the same way, before the invention of mills. The existence of this practice in Palestine, is ascertained by that threatening in the prophecies of Micah : " Thou shalt sow, but thou shalt not reap ; thou shalt tread the olives, but shalt not anoint thee with oil; and sweet Avine, but shalt not drink wine." But unequivocal traces of it may be discovered in ages long anterior to the days of that prophet ; for in the blessing of Asher, we find Moses praying: " Let Asher dip his foot in oil." Whether any preparation was used in those ancient times to facilitate the expression of the juice, we are not informed ; but it is certain thai mills are now used for pressing and grinding the olives which grow in the neighbourhood of Athens, and probably in other eastern countries. These mills are in the town, aiid not in the spot where the olives grow; and seem to be used in consequence of its being found, that the mere weight of the human body is insuflficient for the purpose of etfeclually extracting the oil. — Paxton. "^ CHAPTER XXXIV. Ver. 1. And Moses went up from the plains of Moab unto the mountain of Nebo, to the top of Pisgah, that is over against Jericho : and the Lord showed him all the land of Gilead, unto Dan. Mr. Buckingham, travelling through the mountains of Gilead, says, " We were now in a land of extraordinary richness, abounding with the most beautiful prospects, clothed with thick forests, varied with verdant slopes, and possessing extensive plains of a fine red soil, now covered with thistles as the best proof of its fertility, and yielding in nothing to the celebrated plains of Zabulon and Esdrae- lon, in Galilee and Samaria. We continued our way to the northeast, through a country, the beauty of which so surprised us, that we often asked each other, what were our sensations ; as if to ascertain the reality of what we saw, and persuade each other, by mutual confession of our de- light, that the picture before us was not an optical illusion. The landscape alone, which varied at every tuin, and gave us new beauties from very ditferent points of view, was, of itself, worth all the pains of an excursion to the eastward of Jordan to obtain a sight of; and the park-like scenes, that sometimes softened the romantic wildness of the general character as a whole, reminded us of similar spots in less neglected lands." JOSHUA. CHAPTER I. Ver. 1. Now, after the death of Moses, the ser- vant of the Lord, it came to pass, that the Lord spake unto Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' minister, saying, 2. Moses my servant is dead : ngw therefore arise, go over this Jordan, thou, and all this people, unto the land which I do give to them, even to the children of Israel. The conquest of Canaan, by the Israelites, having so oft- en been the subject of cavil among the enemies of revela- tion, and being adverted to in terms of approbation above, may properly be considered in this place. Their conduct in this affair is satisfactorily vindicated by Mr. Townsend, m his " Old Testament historically and chronologically ar- ranged," from which we transcribe the following pas- sages : — God, the great governor, who possesses all power over his creatures, and may justly punish those who vio- late his laws, in that manner which to his wisdom may seem most impressive and useful, commanded the Israel- ites to exterminate the Canaanites, as th^ just retribution for their crimes and idolatries. God might have destroyed them by famine, by earthquake, by pestilence : He might have drowned by a local deluge, or consumed them by fire from heaven ; instead of these, he commissioned the people of Israel to root them out by the sword. In so doing, the Almighty not only demonstrated to the whole world his hatred of the corruptions and pollutions of superstition, but he more particularly enforced on the Israelites the purity of his law, the certainly of their own punishment if they apostatized, and the freedom from temporal evil which they should consequently enjoy if they persevered in their allegiance to hhn, their sovereign. Lest this invasion of Canaan by the Israelites, however, should be drawn into precedent by other nations, for ambition or religious perse- cution ; they were assured by continued and powerful mira- cles, that their cause was just, that they should be successful, and that they were not subject at that period to the common laws of nations. The people of Israel was the sword of God, the great magistrate of earth, and they were no more to be condemned in thus acting in conformit}'' to the com- mands of God, than the executioner can be who fulfils the last sentence of the law. Before, then, other nations in- vade theterritory of their neighbours on the same supposed authority as the Israelites, the same commission from heaven must be given ; and that commission must be au- thenticated by miracles equally evident, perpetual, and wonderful. Many, however, have not been satisfied with this argument; and would discard the doctrine of the pecu- liar providence, which regulated by a visible theocracy the conduct of the chosen people : they would defend the invasion of Palestine on other grounds. They would judge of the transactions of that period, (regardless of the peculiar circumstances under which they took place,) by modern ideas, and the present law of nations. Some sup- pose that the conduct of the Israelites was solely defensi- ble, on the supposition that there had been a partition of the whole earth by the sons of Noah ; and that Canaan had been allotted to Shem : the sons of Shem, therefore, were jus- tified in claiming their ancient inheritance from the Ca- naanites, who were descended from Ham. Others have asserted that the Canaanites commenced the war by at- tacking the Israelites : an assertion that cannotbe defended from the history. While others have affirmed, without any well-gi' unded arguments, that the Israelites, as a wan- dering people, having no certain home, were justified in forcibly invading, and taking possession of an adjoining territory. Rut Michaelis is of opinion that the right of the Israelites originated in their being actually the proprietors of Canaan, of which they had been unjustly dispossessed by the intruding and hostile Canaanites. The laws of nations are always the same. If any na- tion, or tribe, or part of a tribe, take possession of an un- known, undiscovered, unoccupied, or uninhabited coun- try, the right of properly vests in them; they are its proprie- tors and owners. After the deluge, the world might be said to be in this state ; and Michaelis has endeavoured to prove, that the ancestors of Abraham were the original occupiers of the pasture land of Canaan. Canaan, there- fore, by the law of nations, as well as by the promises of God, was the lot of Abraham's inheritance, and the right- ful land of his descendants. The Canaanite and the Periz-' zite had only just established themselves in Canaan when Abraham removed from Haran to that country ; and were so weak and few in number, that they never interfered with the right of sovereignty assumed and exerted by Abraham. The Canaanites were merchants and adven- turers who had been originally settled near the borders of the Indian Ocean ; and who, having been dispossessed by the Cuthic Sidonians, had migrated westward, to form es- tablishments on the seacoasts of Palestine, and carry on commerce with the herdsmen who traversed it. They were for some time contented with their factories on the seacoasts, but they gradually obtained possession of the inland country. The Perizzites, too, were a warlike tribe, who now first made their appearance in Canaan ; they had originally inhabited the northeast of Babylonia. Wheth- er they had been dispossessed of their settlements ; whether they were seeking new establishments ; or for whatever purpose they were now in Palestine, they gave no inter- ruption to the progress of Abraham, although Abraham entered upon the Holy Land and continued his journey ings with a large retinue, and as a powerful prince. He took possession of Canaan as the territory of his ances- tors; not indeed as a fixed habitation, but as a pasture land adapted to his numerous flocks and herds. He traversed the whole country as a proprietor, without a competitor. He had the power of arming three hundred and eighteen of his own servants, born in his own house; and it is most probable that he had others who are not enumerated. He declared war as an independent prince of this country against five neighbouring princes; and formed an alliance with Abimelech, as an equal and as a sovereign. It is true, he purchased land of the Canaanitish family of Heth, but this was because the Hittites had gradually made a more fixed settlement in that part of the country; their intrusion had not been at first prevented by the ancestors of Abraham; and by this sufferance they made that dis- trict their peculiar property. As Abraham thus traversed and possessed Canaan, with undisputed authority, so too ■ did Isaac and Jacob in like manner. No one opposed their right: They exercised, as Abraham had done 'be- fore them, sovereign power; they never resigned that power; nor gave up toothers the property of that land, which now, by long prescription, as well as by the promise of God, had become. entirely their own. The ancestors, then, of the Israelites, Michaelis argues, were either the sole sovereigns, or the most powerful of those princes who possessed, in early ages, the Holy Land. By the famine which occurred in the days of Joseph, they were compelled to leave their own country, and take ref- uge in Egypt : yet they never lost sight of the sepulchre of their fathers. And though we do not read that acts of ownership were continued to maintain and perpetuate their right, we can have but little doubt, that something of the kind took place, for Jacob was taken from Egypt to be buried there; Joseph assured them that they should re-' turn; and the Egyptians, their oppressors, a kindred branch of the powerful tribes which had by this time en- tirely taken possession of Palestine, kept them in bond- Chap. 2, 3. JOSHUA. 127 age, and refused to let them go, lest they should claim the inheritance of their fathers. If this claim of the Israelites can be proved to be well founded, they would have been entitled, by the law of nations, forcibly to take possession of the Holy Land; and it will be interesting to observe how .he merciful providence of God afforded them the opportu- nity of successfully regaining their lawful inheritance, ancl at the same time accomplishing his own divine pur- poses, to the fulfilment of his prophecies, and to the hap- piness and security of his church. The Israelites may be considered as the servants and ministers of God, punish- ing the idolatry of the Canaanites, and instituting in its place, in the midst of an apostate world, the religion of the one true God. In every victory they obtained, they must have admired the faithfulness of that promise which had foretold their entire possession of this land; and they must have been persuaded, that if they served other gods, they would bring down upon themselves the punishments pre- dicted by Moses. — Vide Michaelis, Comment. twice, so as to put us in imminent danger of perishing with thirst." — Burder. Ver. 23. Now therefore ye are cursed ; and there shall none of you be freed from being bond- men, and hewers of wood, and drawers of wa- ter, for the house of my God. In the kingdom of Algiers, the women and children are charged with the care of their flocks and their herds, with providing food for the family, cutting fuel, fetching water, and when their domestic affairs allow them, with tending their silk worms. The daughters of the Turcomans in Palestine, are employed in the same mean and laborious offices. In Homer, Andromache fed the horses of her he- roic husband. It is probable, the cutting of wood was an- other female occupation. The verv great antiquity of these customs, is confirmed by the prophet Jeremiah, who com- plains that the children were sent to gather wood for idol- atrous purposes ; and in his Lamentations, he bewails the oppressions which his people suffered from their enemies, in these terms: " They took the young men to grind, and the children fell under the wood.'' Hence the servile con- dition to which the Gibeonites were reduced by Joshua, for imposing upon him and the princes of the congregation, ap- pears to have been much more severe than we are apt at first to suppose : " Now, therefore, ye are cursed, and there shall none of you be freed from being bondmen, and hew- ers of vood., and drawers of water, for the house of my God." 130 JOSHUA. Chap. 10. The bitterness of their doom did not consist in being sub- jected to a laborious service, for it was the usual employ- ment of women and children ; but in their being degraded from the characteristic employment of men, that of bearing arms, and condemned with their posterity for ever to the employment of females. — Paxton. CHAPTER X. Ver. 6. And the Lord said unto Joshua, Be not afraid because of them ; for to-morrow, about this time, will I deliver them up all slain be- fore Israel: thou shalt hough their horses, and burn their chariots with fire. With the enemy's horses, the Israelites had a different procedure from other booty. For their direction, indeed, on this point, they had no general and permanent law, pre- scribed them, but merely the order from God, issued by Joshua (x. 6) before the battle at the waters of Merom ; according to which order, they were naturally led to regu- late their conduct in aftertimes. In their wars before the reign of Sol(jmon, they made no use of horses, though some of their enemies did ; and this same cavalry of their enemies was wont to be very formidable, and sometimes gave them the superiority of the Israelites in the plains. At the same time, the event has often shown, that a brave, steady, close infantry, without the support of horse, will stand the shock of hostile cavalry without the smallest dis- order ; of which, although our cavalry is far more formi- dable by reason of their close charge, modern history fur- nishes examples. Indeed, on one occasion, besides more than 20,000 infantry, David took, I know not whether 1700, or 7000 cavalry, prisoners ; their retreat across the Eu- phrates having been probably cut off, or that they were compelled to surrender for want of subsistence. But when the Israelites did get a booty of horses, they did not know what use to make of them. Their husbandry was carried on in the ancient way, and to much more advantage, with oxen, which are not so expensive to maintain ; and to this their whole rural economy was directed. In war, they did not employ cavalry, and would have been bad horsemen ; and for travelling, they commonly made use of the ass, to which whoever is accustomed from his youth, will not wil- lingly venture to ride a mettled horse, particularly such a one as is employed in war. Horses, therefore, were to them quite a useless sort of plunder, unless they had sold them, which was not advisable, because their enemies, in a roundabout way, might have bought them again. It was far better policy for them to diminish as far as possible this race of animals, by means of which their enemies might, .on some occasions, obtain a manifest advantage over them; just as the Romans put the elephants of their enemies to death, because they had no desire to make use of this for- eign and dubious expedient to help them to victory, and yei saw that elephants might sometimes be dangerous to tiieir troops. In the first engagement which the Israelites had with an enemy whose cavalry and war-chariots made him formidable, God commanded them to hough or ham- string, that is, to cut the thigh-sinew of the horses which they took; and they did so, Josh. x. 6 — 9. From ignorance of military affairs, most expositors have understood this command as if it meant, not that the horses should be kill- ed, but merely lamed in the hmd-legs, and then let go : and into this mistake, by following Bochart, as he had Kimchi, I was led in the first edition of this work. — I have never been in war, and know just as little of the veterinary art ; nor have I ever seen a ham-strung horse. But a horse so treated, must, instead of running off, fall instantly back- ward, and writhe about miserably till he die, which gen- erally happens from loss of blood, by the stroke of the sabre cutting the artery of the thigh. This is still, as military people have since informed me, the plan adopted to make those horses that are taken, but cannot be easily brought away, unserviceable to the enemv again. They ham-string them, which can be done in an instant; and they generally die of the wound, by bleeding to death ; but though they should not, the wound never heals ; so that if even the en- emy recover them alive, he is forced to despatch them : and every compassionate friend of horses, who has ever seen one in that situation, will do so, in order to terminate his misery. There is, therefore, no foundation for Kimchi's opinion, that mere landing was enjoined, because it would be wrong to put an animal unnecessarily to death. For thus to lame a horse that would still live, in my opinion, would rather have been extreme cruelty; because, being then useless, nobody would be likely to give him any food, MiCHAELIS. Ver. 11. And it came to pass, as they fled from before Israel, and were in the going down to Belh-horon, that the Lord cast down great stones from heaven upon them unto Azekah, and they died: they were more which died with hailstones, than they whom the children of Israel slew with the sword. Some writers are of opinion that this was hail, larger and more violent than usual; others maintain that Joshua is to be understood literally, of a shower of stones. Such a circumstance, so far from being impossible, has several times occurred. The Romans, who looked upon showers of stones as very disastrous, have noticed many instances of them. Under the reign of Tullius Hostilius, when it was known to the people of Rome that a shower of stones had fallen on the mountain of Alba, at first it seemed in- credible. They sent out proper persons to inquire into this prodigy, and it was found that stones had fallen after the same manner as a storm of hail driven by the wind. Some time after the battle at Cannoe, there was seen upon the same mountain of Alba a shower of stones, which continued for two days together. In 1538, near a village in Italy called Tripergola, after some shocks of an earthquake, there was seen a shower of stones and dust, which darkened the air for two days, after which they observed that a mountain had risen up in the midst of the Lucrine Lake. — Burder. A similar phenomenon in modern times is thus described in Com. Porter's Letters from Constantinople and its En- virons, (vol. J. p. 44,) as having occurred in the summer of 1831 :— " We had got perhaps a mile and a ^alf on our way when a cloud rising in the west, gave indications of an ap- proaching rain. In a few minutes we discovered some- thing falling from the heavens with a heavy splash, and of a whitish appearance. I could not conceive what it was, but observing some gulls near, I supposed it to be them darting for fish ; but soon after discovered that they were large balls of ice falling. Immediately we heard a sound like rumbling thunder, or ten thousand carriages rolling furiously over the pavement. The whole Bosphorus was in a foam, as though heaven's artillery had been discharged upon us and our frail machine. Our faie seemed inevita- ble, our umbrellas were raised to protect us ; the lumps of ice stripped them into ribands. We fortunately had a bul- lock's hide in the boat, under which we crawled and saved ourselves from further injury. One man, of the three oarsmen, had his hand literally smashed ; another much injured in the shoulder ; Mr. H. received a severe blow in the leg; my right hand was somewhat disabled, and alf more or less injured. A smaller kaick accompanied, with my two servants. They were both disabled, and are now in bed with their wounds; the kaick was terribly bruised. It was the most awful and terrific scene that I ever wit- nessed, and God forbid that I should be ever exposed to such another. Balls of ice as large as my two fists, fell into the boat, and some of them came with such violence as certainly to have broken an arm or leg, had thev struck us in those parts. One of them struck the blade of an oar and split it. The scene lasted, may be, five minutes; but it was five minutes of the most awful feeling that I ever ex- perienced. When it passed over, we found the surround- ing hills covered with masses of ice, I cannot call it hail ; the trees stripped of their leaves and limbs, and every thing looking desolate. We proceeded on our course, however, and arrived at our destination, drenched and awe-struck. The ruin had not extended so far as Candalie, and it was difficult to make them comprehend the cause of the ner- vous and agitated condition in which we arrived ; the Reis Effendi asked me if I was ever so agitated when in action ? I answered no, for then I had something to excite me, and human means only to oppose. He asked the minister if he ever was so a ffected in a gale of wind at sea 7 He answered no, for then he could exercise his skill to disarm or render Chap. 10—17. JOSHUA. 19\ harmless the elements. He asked him why he siculd be afiected now 1 He replied, ' From the awful idea of being crushed to death by the hand of God with stones from heaven, when resistance would be vain, and where it would be impious to be brave.' He clasped his hands, raised his eyes to heaven, and exclaimed, ' God is great !' " Up to this hour, late in the afternoon, I have not reco- vered my composure ; my nerves are so affected as scarcely to be able to hold my pen, or communicate my ideas. The scene was awful beyond all description. I have witnessed repeated earthquakes ; the lightning has played, as it were, about my head ; the wind roared, and the waves have at one moment thrown me to the sky, and the next have sunk me into a deep abyss. I have been in action, and seen death and destruction around me in every shape of horror; but 1 never before had the feeling of awe which seized upon me on this occasion, and siill haunts, and I feel will ever haunt me. I returned to the beautiful village of Buyucdere. The sun was out in all its splendour ; at a distance all looked smiling and charming ; but a nearer approach dis- covered roofs covered with workmen repairing the bro- ken tiles; desolated vineyards, and shattered windows. My porter, the boldest of my family, who had ventured an instant from the door, had been knocked down by a hail- stone, and had they not dragged him in by the heels, would have been battered to death. Of a flock of geese in front of our house, six were killed, and the rest dreadfully man- gled. Two boatmen were killed in the upper part of the village, and I have heard of broken bones in abundance. Many of the thick brick tiles with which my roof is cover- ed, are smashed to atoms, and my house was inundated by the rain that succeeded this visitation. It is impossible to convey an idea of what it was. Imagine to yourself, how- ever, the heavens suddenly froze over, and as suddenly broken to pieces in irregular masses, of from half a pound to a pound weight, and precipitated to the earth. My own servants weighed several pieces of three quarters of a pound ; and many were found by others of upwards of a pound. There were many which fell around the boat in which I was, that appeared to me to be as large as the swell of the large sized water decanter. You may think this romance. I refer to the bearer of this letter, who was with me, and witnessed the scene, for the truth of every word it contains," — Letters from Constantinople. Ver. 12. Then spake Joshua to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. {See Engraving.) Ver. 21. And all the people returned to the camp to Joshua at Makkedah in peace : none moved his tongue against any of the children of Israel. When a person speaks of the fear to which his enemy is reduced, he says, "Ah! he dares not now to shake his tongue against me." " He hurt you ! the fellow will not shake his tongue against you." — Roberts. Ver. 24. And said unto the captains of the men of war which went with him, Come near, put your feet upon the necks of these kings. And they came "near, and put their feet upon the necks of them. See on 2 Sam. 44. 21. This in the East is a favourite way of triumphing over a fallen foe. In the history of the battles of the gods, or giants, particular mention is made of the closing scene, how the conquerors went and trampled on their enemies. When people are disputing, should one be a little fSressed, and the other begin to triumph, the former will say, " I will tread upon thy neck, and after that beat thee." A low- caste man insulting one who is high, is sure to hear some one say to the offended individual, " Put your feet on his neck." (See on Isa. xviii. 2, 7.)— Roberts. CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 12. Now therefore give me this mountain, whereof the Lord spake in that day ; for thou heardest in that day how the Anakims were there, and that the cities we7e great and fenced ; if so be the Lord will be with me, then I shall be able to drive them out, as the Lord said. The mountainous parts of the Holy Land are so far from being inhospitable, unfruitful, or the refuse of the land of Canaan, that in the division of this country, the mountain of Hebron was granted to Caleb as a particular favour ; " Now, therefore, give me this mountain of which the Lord spake in that day." In the time of Asa, the " hilt country of Judah" mustered five hundred and eighty thou- sand men of valour ; an argument beyond dispute, that the land was able to maintain them. Even in the present times, though cultivation and improvement are exceedingly neg- lected, while the plains and valleys, although as fruitful as ever, lie almost entirely desolate, every little hill is crowded with inhabitants. If this part of the Holy Land was com- posed, as some object, only of naked rocks and precipices, why is it better peopled than the plains of Esdraelon, Rama, Acre, or Zabulon, which are all of them extremely fertile and delightful 1 It cannot be urged that the inhabitants live with more safety on the hills and mountains, ihan on the plains, as there are neither walls nor fortifications to secure their villages and encampments ; and except in the range of Lebanon, and some other mountains, few or no places of difficult access ; so that both of them are equally exposed to the insults of an enemy. But the reason is ob- vious ; they find among these mountainous rocks and precipices, sufficient convenience for themselves, and much greater for their cattle. Here they have bread to the full, while their flocks and their herds browse upon richer herb- age, and both man and beast quench their thirst from springs of excellent water, which is but too much wanted, especially in the summer season, through all the plains of Syria. This fertility of Canaan is fully confirmed by writers of great reputation, whose impartiality cannot be justly suspected. Tacitus calls it a fruitful soil, uber solum ; and Justin affirms, that in this country the purity of the air, and the fertility of the soil, are equally admira- ble: Sed non minor loci ejus apricitatis quam ubertatis admiratio est. The justice of these brief accounts, Dr. Shaw, and almost every modern traveller, fully verifies. When he travelled in Syria and Phenicia, in December and January, the whole country, he remarks, looked ver- dant and cheerful ; and the woods particularly, which are chiefly planted with the gall-bearing oak, were every- where bestrewed with a variety of anemonies, ranuncu- lusses, colchicas, and mandrakes. Several pieces of ground near Tripoli were full of licorice ; and at the mouth of a famous grotto he saw an elegant species of the blue lily, the same with Morrison's lilium Persicum florens. In the beginning of March, the plains, particularly between Jaffa and Rama, were everywhere planted with a beautiful varietv of fritillaries, tulips of innumerable hues, and a profus'ion of the rarest and most beautiful flowers ; while the hills and the mountains were covered with yellow pollium, and some varieties of thyme, sage, and rosemary. — Paxton. CHAPTER XVII. Ver. 16. And all the Canaanites that dwell in the land of the valley have chariots of iron, loth they who are of Bethshean and her towns, and they who are of the valley of Jezreel. The warriors of primitive times were carried to the firld in chariots, drawn for the most part by two horses. The custom of riding and fighting upon horses, was not intro- duced into Greece, and the regions of Asia bordering on the Hellespont, till some time after the Trojan war: for Homer, whose authority in such cases is indisputable, alwavs conducts his heroes to battle in chariots, never on horseback. In what age the chariot was first used in battle, cannot now be ascertained ; but by the help of the sacred volume, we can trace the practice to a very remote an- tiquity, for the aboriginal inhabitants of Canaan aj)pear, 132 JOSHUA. Chap. 18—24. from the number of armed chariots which they possessed, when Joshua invaded their country, to have been trained to that mode of warfare long before. " And the children of Joseph said. The hill is not enough for us ; and all the Canaanites that dwell in the land of the valley have char- iots of iron, both they who are of Bethshean and her towns, and they who are of the valley of Jezreel." This by no means intimates, that the chariots were made of iron, but only that they were armed with it. Such chariots were by the ancients called currus falcati, and in Greek Spezwofvpai. They had a kind of scythes, of about two cubits long, fast- ened to long axle-trees on both wheels ; these being driven swiftly through a body of men, made great slaughter, mow- ing them down like grass or corn. The efficacious resist- ance which the Canaanites, from their chariots of iron, opposed to the arms of Israel, is emphatically remarked by the sacred historian : " And the Lord was with Judah, and they drave out the inhabitants of the mountain, but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron." The native princes of Canaan, /nlly aware of the great advantages to be derived from this rpecifcs of force, in combating the armies of Israel, which consisted, as has been already observed, entirely of infantry, continued to improve it with a care and diligence propor- tioned to its importance. In the time of the judges, not long after the death of Joshua, Jabin the king of Canaan, sent nine hundred chariots of iron into the field against the people of Israel : and in a succeeding war, between this people and their inveterate enemies the Philistines, the latter met them in the fiel^ with " thirty thousand chariots, and six thousand horseme'n, and people as the sand which is on the seashore for multitude." — Paxton. CHAPTER XVIII. Ver. 25. Gibeon, and Ramah, and Beeroth. The oriental geographers speak of Ramah as the metrop- olis of Palestine ; and ev^ery appearance of its ruins even laow confirms the opinion of its having been once a consid- erable city. Its situation, as lying immediately in the high road from Jaffa to Jerusalem, made it necessarily a place of great resort ; and from the fruitfulness of the country around it, it must have been equally important as a mili- larj' station or a depot for supplies, and as a magazine for the collection of such articles of commerce as were export- ed from the coast. In its present state, the town of Ramah is about the size of Jaffa, in the extent actually occupied. The dwellings of this last, however, are crowded together around the sides of a hill, while those of Ramah are scat- tered widely over the face of the level plain on which it stands. The style of building here is that of high square houses, with flattened domes covering them ; and some of the old terraced roofs are fenced around with raised walls, in which are seen pyramids of hollow earthenware pipes, as if to give air and light, without destroying the strength of the wall itself The inhabitants are estimated at little more than five thousand persons, of whom about one third are Christians of the Greek and Catholic communion, and the remaining two thirds Mohammedans, chiefly Arabs ; the men of power and the military being Turks, and no Jews residing there. The principal occupation of the people is husbandry, for which the surrounding country is highly favourable, and the staple commodities produced by them are corn, olives, oil, and cotton, with some soap and coarse cloth made in the town. There are still remains of some noble subterranean cisterns at Ramah, not inferior either in extent or execution to many of those at Alexan- dria : they were intended for the same purpose, namely, to serve in time of war as reservoirs of water." — Buckingham. CHAPTER XXIII. Ver. 7. But they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the Lord your God hath given you. "What!" says a wife to her angry husband, "am la thorn in your eyes 1" " Alas ! alas ! he has seen another ; I am now a thorn in his eyes." " Were I not a thorn in his eyes, his anger would not burn so long." " My old friend Tamban never looks at my house now, because it gives thorns to his eyes." — Roberts. CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 12. And I sent the hornet before you, which drave them out from before you, even the tw(» kings of the Amorites ; but not with thy sword, nor with thy bow. See on Ex. 24. 28. Ver. 32. And the bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, buried they in Shechem, in a parcel of ground which Jacob bought of the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, for a hundred pieces of sil ver : and it became the inheritance of the chil dren of Joseph. Joseph was not interred in Shechem, but, according to the ancient custom, in a field adjoinmg. Probably the other children of Jacob received the like honour, each tribe taking care to bury its ancestor, either at Machpelah, or elsewhere in the land of Canaan. Josephus asserts that it was so, upon the credit of an ancient tradition. St. Ste- phen confirms the relation. Acts vii. 16. Savages consider the tombs of their ancestors as titles to the possession of the lands which they inhabit. This country is ours, say they ; the bones of our fathers are here laid to rest. When they are forced to quit it, they dig them up with tears, and carry them off with every token of respect. About thirty miles below the falls of "St. Anthony, (saj^s Carver,) in North America, several bands of the Naudowessie Indians have a burying-place, where these people, though thev have no fixed residence, living in tents, and abiding but a few months on one spot, always contrive to deposite the bones of their dead. At the spriiig equinox these bands annually assemble here to hold a grand council with all the othei bands ; wherein they settle their operations for the ensuing year. At this time, in particular, they bring with them their dead, for interment, bound up in buffaloes' skins. If any of these people die in the cummer, at a distance from the burying-ground, and they find it impossible to remove the body before it would putrify, they bum the flesh from the bones, and preserving the latter, bur}' them in the I manner described. — Burder. JUDGES. CHAPTER I. Ver. 7. Threescore and ten kings, having their thumbs and their great toes cut off The Hebrew has this, " the thumbs of their hands and of their feet." The Hindoos call the thumb the reria-viril, the great finger of the hand, and the large toe is named the great finger of the foot. This punishment was exceeding- ly common in ancient times, and was inflicted principally on those who had committed some flagrant oflTence with their hands and their feet. Thus, those convicted of for- gery, or numerous thefts, had their thumbs cut off. The practice is abolished, but its memory will remain, as it is now one of the scarecrows of the nursery and domestic life : " If you steal any more, I will cut off your thumbs." " Let me find out the thief, and I will soon have his thumbs." — Roberts. CHAPTER III. Ver. 1 7. And he broug-ht the present unto Eglon king of Moab : and Eglon was a very fat man. 18. And when he had made an end to offer the present, he sent away the people that bare the present. See on Gen. 43. 45. There is often in the East a great deal of pomp and pa- rade in presenting their gifts. " Through ostentation," says Maillet, " they never fail to load upon four or five horses what might easily be carried by one. In like manner as to jewels, trinkets, and other things of value, they place in fifteen dishes, what a single plate would very well hold." Something of this pomp seems to be referred to in this pas- sage, where we read of making an end of offering the pres- ent, and of a number of people who conveyed it. This re- mark also illustrates 2 ICings viii. 9. So Hazael went to meet him, and took a present with him, even of every good thing of Damascus, forty camels^ burden. — Harmer. Ver. 19. But he himself turned again from the quarries that we^-e by Gilgal, and said, I have a secret errand unto thee, O king : who said. Keep silence. And all that stood by him went out from him. From a circumstance mentioned by Mr. Bruce, it ap- pears that Ehud acted in strict conformity to the customs of the time and place, so that neither the suspicion of the king nor his attendants should be excited by his conduct. It was usual for the attendants to retire when secret mes- sages were to be delivered. " I drank a dish of coffee, and told him, that I was a bearer of a confidential message from All Bey of Cairo, and wished to deliver it to him without witnesses, whenever he pleased. The room was accord- ingly cleared without delay, excepting his secretary, who was also going away, when t pulled him back by the clothes, saying, stay, if you please; we shall need you to write the answer." — Burder. Ver. 20. And Ehud came unto him ; and he was sitting in a summer-parlour, which he had for himself alone. Dr. Shaw tells us, their doors are large, and their cham- bers spacious; conveniences, as he observes, very well adapted to those hotter climates. But when Eglon is rep- resented as receiving Ehud and Death, in a parlour of cooling, as it is called, in the margin of Judges iii. 20, or rather in a chamber of cooling^ something more seems to be meant than merely its having a large door, or bemg spa- cious ; at least there are iiow other contrivances in the East, to give coolness to particular rooms, which are very com- mon ; and though the time in which Eglon lived, is ac- knowledged to be of very remote antiquity, yet we are to remember he was a prince, and in the palaces of such these contrivances without doubt began. The doctor is silent upon this point, but Russell has given us the following ac- count of one of their methods of cooling rooms. Their great houses at Aleppo ai'e composed of apartments on each of the sides of a square court, all of stone ; and consist of a ground door, which is generally arched, and an upper story, which is flat on the top, and either terraced with hard plaster, or paved stone ; above-stairs is a colonnade, if not round the whole court, at least fronting the West, off from which are their rooms and kiosques ; these latter are a sort of wooden divans, that project a little way from their other buildings, and hang over the street ; they are raised about a foot and a half higher than the floor of the room, to which they are quite open, and by having windows in front and on each side, there is a great draught of air, which makes them cool in the summer, the advantage chiefly intended by them. They have another way of cooling their rooms in Egypt. It is done by openings at the top, which let the fresh air into them. Egmont and Hey man, as well as Maillet, make mention of them, but the last-mentioned au- thor gives the most distinct account of these contrivances : they make, he tells us, their halls extremely large and lofty, with a dome at the top, which towards the North has several open windows ; these are so constructed as to throw the north wind down into these rooms, and by this means, though the country is excessively hot, they can make the coolness of these apartments such as, oftentimes, not to be borne without being wrapped in furs. Egmont and Hey- man speak of chambers cooled after this manner, as well as halls. Eglon's appears to have been a chamber, and what Shaw calls an olee, which gives a propriety to the mention that is made of Ehud's passing through the porch, which no interpreter before the doctor has, that I know of, remarked : but whether it was cooled by a kiosque, as they are called at Aleppo, or by an Egyptian dome, or by some contrivance distinct from both, is of no consequence to de- termine. That some contrivance to mitigate the extreme heat of that climate began early to obtain, in the palaces pi princes, is natural to believe ; that it began as early as the time of Eglon, this passage puts out of all doubt. It was the more necessary, as Eglon appears to have kept his court at Jericho, where the heat is so excessive, that it has proved fatal to some even in March. — Harmer. Ver. 25. And they tarried till they were ashamed ; and, behold, he opened not the doors of the parlour : therefore they took a key and open- ed them; and, behold, their lord was fallen down dead on the earth. The wooden locks commonly used in Egypt, " consist of a long hollow piece of wood, fixed in the door, so as to slide backward and forward, which enters a hole made for it in the doorpost, and is there fastened by small bolts of iron wire, which fall from above into little orifices made for them in the top of the lock. The key is a long piece of wood, having at the end small pieces of iron wire of diflferent lengths, irregularly fixed in, corresponding in number and direction with the bolts which fall into the lock ; these it litt> upon being introduced into the lock, which it then pulls back. The bolts of wire differ in number from three to fourteen or fifteen, and it is impossible to guess at the num- ber a lock contains', or at the direction in which they are placed." — Turner's Journal o^ a Ton: in the Levant. 134 JUDGES Chap. 4. Ver. 31, And after him was Shamgar the son of Anath, which slew of the Philistines six hun- dred men with an ox-goad: and he also de- livered Israel. Mr. Maundrell has an observation which at once ex- plains this transaction, and removes every difficulty from the passage. He says, " the countrypeople were now every- where at plough in the fields, in order to sow cotton. It was observable, that in ploughmg they used goads of an ex- traordinary size ; upon measuring of several, I found them about eight feet long, and at the bigger end six inches in circumference. They were armed at the lesser end with a sharp prickle for driving the oxen, at the other end with a small spade, or paddle of iron, strong and massy, for cleansing the plough from the clay that encumbers it in working. May we not from hence conjecture, that it was with such a goad as one of these, that Shamgar made that prodigious slaughfer related of him, Judges iii. 21. I am confident that whoever should see one of these mstruments, would judge it to be a weapon not less fit, perhaps fitter, than a sword for such an execution. Goads of this sort I saw always used hereabouts, and also in Syria ; and the reason is, because the same single person both drives the oxen, and also holds and manages the plough ; which makes it necessary to use such a goad as is above described, to avoid the encumbrance of two instruments." — Burdkr. CHAPTER IV. Ver. 6. And she sent and called Barak the son of Abinoam out of Kedesh-naphtali, and said unto him, Hath not the Lord God of Israel com- manded, saying, Go, and draw towards Mount Tabor, and take with thee ten thousand men of the children of Naphtali, and of the children of Zebulun ? Arriving at the top, we found ourselves on an oval plain, of about a quarter of a mile in its greatest length, covered with a bed of fertile soil on the west, having at its eastern end a mass of ruins, seemingly the vestiges of churches, grottoes, strong walls, and fortifications, all deci- dedly of some antiquity, and a few appearing to be the works of a very remote age. First were pointed out to us three grottoes, two beside each other, and not far from tAVo cisterns of excellent water; which grottoes are said to be the remains of the three tabernacles proposed to be erected by St. Peter, at the moment of the transfiguration, when Jesus, Elias, and Moses, were seen talking together. In one of these grottoes, which they call more particularly the Sanctuary, there is a square stone used as an altar ; and on the sixth of August in every year, the friars of the convent come from Nazareth, with tlieir banners and the host, to say mass here ; at which period they are accompanied -by all the Catholics of the neighbourhood, who pass the night in festivity, and light large bonfires, by a succession of which they have nearly iDared the southern side of the mountain of all the wood that once clothed it. Besides these grottoes, no particular history is assigned to any other of the remains, though among them there seem to have been many large religious buildings. The whole of these ap- pear to have been once enclosed with a strong wall, a large portion of which still remains entire on the north side, having its firm foundation on the solid rock. This ap- peared to me the most ancient part. Traditions here speak of a city built on the top, which sustained a five years' siege, drawing its supplies byskirmish from different parts of the fertile plains below, aiid being furnished with water from two excellent cisterns still above ; but as no fixed period is assigned to this event, it may probably relate to the siege of Vespasian. As there still remained the frag- ments of a wall on the southeast angle, somewhat higher than the rest, we ascended it over heaps of fallen buildings, and enjoyed from thence a prospect truly magnificent, want- ing only the verdure of spring to make it beautiful as well as grand. Placing my compass before me, we had on the northwest a view of the Mediterranean sea, whose blue sur- face filled up an open space left by a downward bend in the outline of the western hills : to west-northwest a smaller portion of its waters were seen : and on the west again the slender line of its distant horizon was just perceptible over a range of land near the seacoast. From west to south the plain of Esdraelon extended over a vast space, being bounded on the south by the range of hills, generally considered to be the Hermon, whose dews are poeti- cally celebrated. Psalm cxxxiii. 3, and having in the same direction, nearer the foot of Tabor, the springs of Ain-el-Sherrar, which send a perceptible stream through its centre, and form the brook Kishon of antiquity. Psalm Ixxxiii. 9. From southeast to the east is the plain of Gali- lee, being almost a continuation of Esdraelon, and, like it, appearing to be highly cultivated, being now ploughed for seed throughout. Benearth the range of this supposed Hermon is seated Endor, famed for the witch who raised the ghost of Samuel, to the terror of the affrighted Saul ; and Nain, equally celebrated as the place at which Jesus raised the only son of a widow from death to life, and restored him to his afflicted parent. The range which bounds the eastern view is thought to be the mountains of Gilboa, where the sam.e Saul, setting an example of self-destruction to his armour-bearer and his three sons, fell on his own sword, rather than fall wounded into the hands of the un- circumcised, by whom he was defeated. The sea of Tibe- rias, or the Lake of Gennesareth, famed as the scene of many miracles, is seen on the northeast, filling the hollow of a "deep valley, and contrasting its light blue waters with the dark brown shades of the barren hills by which it is hemmed around. Here, too, the steep is pointed out down which the herd of swine, who were possessed by the legion of devils, ran headlong into the sea. In the same direction, below, on the plain of Galilee, and about an hour's distance from the foot of Mount Tabor, there is a cluster of buildings, used as a bazar for cattle, frequented on Mondays only. Somewhat farther on is a rising ground, from which it is said that Christ delivered the long and excellent discourse, called the Sermon on the Mount ; and the whole view in this quarter is bounded by the high range of Gebel-el-Telj, or the Mountain of Snow, whose summit M'as at this mo- ment clothed with one white sheet, without a perceptible breach or dark spot in it. The city of Saphet, supposed to be the ancient Bethulia, a city said to be seen far and near, and thought to be alluded to in the apophthegm which. says, " a city set on a hill cannot be hid," is also pointed out in this direction : but though the day was clear, I could not distinguish it, its distance preventing its being defined, from hence without a glass. To the north were the stony hills over which we had journeyed hither, and these com- pleted this truly grand and interesting panoramic view.. — Buckingham. Van Egmont and Heyman give the following account of Tabor : — " This mountain, though somewhat rugged and' difficult, we ascended on horseback, making several cir- cuits round it, which took u*-- about three quarters of an hour. It is one of the highf'st in the whole country, being thirty stadia, or about four English miles, a circumference that rendered it more famous. And it is the most beauti- ful I ever saw, with regard to verdure, being everywhere decorated with small oak-trees, and the ground universally enamelled with a variety of plants and flowers, except oh the south side, where it is not so fully covered with verdure.. On this mountain are great numbers of red partridges, and some wild-boars ; and we were so fortunate as to see the Arabs hunting them. We left, but not without reluctance, this delightful place, and found at the bottom of it a mean village, called Deboura, or Tabour, a name said to be de- rived from the celebrated Deborah mentioned in Judges." Pococke notices this village, which stands on a rising, ground at the foot of Mount Tabor westward; and the learned traveller thinks, that it may be the same as the Da- berath, or Daberah, mentioned in the book of Joshua, as on the borders of Zebulun and Issachar. " Any one," he adds, " who examines the fourth chapter of Judges, may see that' this is probably the spot where Barak and Deborah met at Mount Tabor with their forces and went to pursue Sisera ; and on this account, it might have its name from that great proph'^tess, who then judged and governed Israel ; for Jo- sephus relates, that Deborah and Barak gathered the army together at this mountain." This point Josephus was not. required to prove, as the sacred history contains explicit in- formation on this head, to which the Jewish historian was incapable of adding a single particular. The name of the village seems, however, more probably to be derived from Chap. 4. JUDGES. 135 the mountain, than from the prophetess. Deborah, the name of the place where she dwelt, and to which the chil- dren of Israel came up to her for judgment, was between Ramah and Bethel in Mount Ephraim, and consequently much farther to the south. Whereas in Deboura, or Da- bour, we have the very Dabor or Thaboor of the scrip- tures, with only that slight corruption which the Hebrew names receive, as pronounced by the Arabs. The moun- tain itself they call Djebel Towr.— Modern Traveller. Ver. 10. And Barak called Zebulun and Naph- tali to Kedesh; and he went up with ten thou- sand men at his feet: and Deborah went up with him. The phrase " men at his feet," did not, I believe, refer to any particular class of soldiers, but applied to all, whether they foiight in chariots, on horses, or on foot. This form of speech is used in eastern books to show how many obey or serve under the general. It may be taken from the action of a slave being prostrate at the feet of his master, denoting submission or obedience. In this way devotees, when ad- dressing the gods, always speak of themselves as being at their feet. When the Orientals speak of his Majesty of Britain, they often allude to the millions who are at his feet. The governors, generals, or judges in the East, are said to have the people of such countries, or armies, or dis- tricts, at their feet. Nay, it is common for masters, and {)eople of small possessions, to speak of their domestics as )eing at their feet. It is therefore heard every day, for " I will send my servants," e-nrkdl-adiyila, " those at my feet." — Roberts, Ver. 18. And Jael went out to meet Sisera, and said unto him, Turn in, mv lord, turn in to me ; fear not. And when he had turned in unto her into the tent, she covered him with a mantle. The Arabs are not so scrupulous as the Turks about their women ; and though they have their harem, or yo- men's apartment, in the tent, they readily introduce their acquaintances into it, or those strangers whom they take under their special protection. Pococke's conductor, in his journey to Jerusalem, led him two or three miles to his tent, where he sat with his wife and others round a fire. The faithful Arab kept him there for greater security, the wife being always with him ; no stranger ever daring to come into the women's apartment unless introduced. We discover in this custom, the reason of Jael's invitation to Sisera, when he was defeated by Barak: " Turn in, my lord, turn in to me, fear not." She invited him to take ref- uge in her own division of the tent, into which no stran- ger might presume to enter ; and where he naturally sup- posed himself in perfect safety. — Paxton. There is an apparent treachery in the conduct of Jael to Sisera ; and it appears from the following account as if the inhabitants of that country were still actuated by the same principle of interested dissimulation. " It was about noon when we reached the small village of Deborah, where we alighted to refresh, not suspecting that the treachery for which it is traditionally infamous, both in holy and profane records, was still to be found here at so distant a period. We entered into this village, and, like the unfortunate Sis- era, demanded only a little water to drink, for with every thing else our scrip was well provided. It was furnished to us, as we desired, with provender for our beasts, and the offer of all that the village possessed. While the animals were feeding, I was desirous of ascending to the summit of Mount Tabor, for the enjoyment of the extensive view which it commands. Our guide from the convent offering to accompany me, we took with us a man from the village, who promised to facilitate our ascent by directing us to the easiest paths ; and taking our arms with us, while my servant and the muleteer remained below to take care of the beasts, we all three set out together ; by forced exer- tions we reached the summit in about half an hour. In our descent from Moimt Tabor we entered a grotto, in which there had formerly been a church, and had scarcely got within it, before we heard the rushing of persons before the outer part of the passage by which we had entered. On turning round to ascertain the cause of this noise, we ob- served five or six armed men, three of whom we recog- nised to be those who had made such oflers of their hospi- tality in the village of Deborah below. They called out to us in a loud voice, that if we attempted the slightest resistance we should be murdered, but that if we submit- ted to be quietly stripped, no violence should be offered to our persons. - There was no time for parley, though my companions at first cried for mercy, but as I rushed out with my musket cocked, and presented, they instantly fol- lowed me, and an unexpected discharge drove our assail- ants to seek shelter behind the masses of rock near the cave. A regular skirmish now commenced, in which we kept up a retreating fire, and often exposed ourselves to their shot, for the sake of getting to our mules at the foot of the hill. During a full hour of this kind of running fight, none of our party was hurt. From the first it seemed evident to us that we had been betrayed by our Deborah' guide, and our notion was at length confirmed by his going over to the assailing party, and using his arms against us. Fortunately, and justly too, this man was himself wounded by a ball from my musket, and when he fell shrieking, on the side of the hill, his companions hastened to his relief, while we profited by the alarm of the moment to continue our retreat, and rejoin our mules below. Here we drew off at a short distance from the village of Deborah, and, with arms in our hands, being exhausted and fatigued, refreshed ourselves beneath a tree ; but we had not yet remounted, when a large party, professing to be from the sheik of Deborah, a village consisting only of a few huts, came to sequester our beasts, for what they called the public service. We treated this with a proper degree of warmth, and threatened death to the first that shouW dare to lay hands on any thing belonging to us : so that the brave villagers kept aloof." — Buckingham. Ver. 19. And he said unto her, Give me, I pray thee, a little water to drink ; for I am thirsty. And she opened a bottle of milk, and gave him drink, and covered him. The method of making butter in the^East, illustrates the conduct of Jael, the wife of Heber, described in the book of Judges : " And Sisera said unto her. Give me, I pray thee, a little water to drink, for I am thirsty : and she open- ed a bottle of milk, and gave him drink, and covered him." In the song of Deborah, the statement is repeated : " He asked water, and she gave him milk, she brought forth butter in a lordly dish." The word (nNon hemah) which our translators rendered butter, properly signifies cream ; which is undoubtedly the meaning of it in this passage, for Sisera complained of thirst, and asked a little water to quench it, a purpose to which butter is but little adapted. Mr. Harmer indeed urges the same objection to cream, which, he contends, few people would think a very proper beverage for one that was extremely thirsty; and con- cludes, that it must have been buttermilk which Jael, who had just been churning, gave to Sisera. But the opimon of Dr. Russell is preferable, that the hemah of the scrip- tures, is probably the same as the haymak of the Arabs, which is not, as Harmer supposed, simple cream, but cream produced by simmering fresh sheeps^ milk for some hours over a slow fire. It could not be butter newly churn- ed, which Jael presented to Sisera, because the Arab but- ter is apt to be foul, and is commonly passed through a strainer before it is used ; and Russell declares, he never saw butter offered to a stranger, but always haymak: nor did he ever observe the Orientals drink buttermilk, but al- ways leban, which is coagulated sour milk, diluted with water. It was leban, therefore, which Pococke mistook lor buttermilk, with which the Arabs treated him in the Holy Land. A similar conclusion maybe drawn concerning the butter and milk which the wife of Heber presented to Sise- ra; they were forced cream or haymak, and leban, or coag- ulated sour milk diluted with water, which is a common and refreshing beverage in those sultry regions. — Paxton. Ver. 21. Then Jael Heber's wife took a nail oi the tent, and took a hammer in her hand, and went softly unto him, and smote the nail into his temples, and fastened it into the ground: (for he was fast asleep and weary:) so he died. 136 JUDGES. Chap. 5. Shaw, describing the tents of the Bedouin Arabs, says, " these tents are kept firm and steady, by bracing or stretch- ing down their eaves with cords tied down to hooked wood- en pins well pointed, which they drive into the ground with a mallet ; one of these pins answering to the nail, as the mallet does to the hammer, which Jael used in fastening to the ground the temples of Sisera." — Burder. CHAPTER V. Ver. 6. In the days of Shamgar the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were unoc- cupied, and the travellers walked through by- ways. There are roads in these countries, but it is very easy to turn out of them, and go to a place by winding about over the lands, when that is thought safer. Dr. Shaw takes no- tice of this circumstance in Barbary, where, he says, they found no hedges, or mounds, or enclosures, to retard or molest them. To this Deborah doubtless refers, though the doctor does not apply this circumstance to that passage, when she says, " In the days of Shamgar, the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were unoccupied, and the travellers walked through byways," or crooked ways, ac- cording to the margin. Judges v. 6. The account Bishop Pococke gives of the manner in which that Arab, under whose care he had put himself, conducted him to Jerusa- lem, illustrates this with great liveliness, which his lordship tells us was by night, and not by the highroad, but through the fields ; " and I observed," says he, " that he avoided as much as he could going near any village or encampment, and sometimes stood still, as I thought, to hearken." And just in that manner people were obliged to travel in Judea, in the days of Shamgar and Jael. — Harmer. Ver. 10, Speak, ye that ride on white asses, ye that sit in judgment, and walk by the way. The ancient Israelites preferred the young ass for the saddle. It is on thfs account, the sacred writers so fre- quently mention riding on young asses and on ass colts. They must have found them, from experience, like the young of all animals, more tractable, lively, and active, than their parents, and, by consequence, better adapted to this employment. Buffbn remarked particularly of the young ass, that it is a gay, nimble, and gentle animal, " and therefore, to be preferred for riding to the same ani- mal, when become lazy and stubborn through age." " In- deed the Hebrew name of the young ass, ~cy," from a root which signifies to rouse or excite, " is expressive of its character for sprightliness and activity." On public and solemn occasions, they adorned the asses which they rode, with rich and splendid trappings. " In this manner," says an excellent writer of Essays on Sacred Zoology, " the magistrates in the time of the Judges, appear to have rode in state. They proceeded to the gate of their city, where they sat to hear causes, in slow procession, mounted on asses superbly caparisoned with white cloth, which cover- ed the greater part of the animal's body. It is thus that we must interpret the words of Deborah : ' Speak, ye that ride on white asses,' on asses caparisoned with coverings made of white woollen cloth, 'ye that sit in judgment, and walk,' or march in state, ' by the way.' The colour is not that of the animal, but of his hiran or covering, for the ass is com- monly dun, and not white." No doubt can be entertained in relation to the existence of the custom alluded to in this quotation. It prevails among the Arabs to the present day ; but it appears rather unnatural, to ascribe the colour of a covering to the creature that wears it. "We do not call a man white or black, because he happens to be dressed in vest- ments of white or black cloth ; neither did the Hebrews. The expression naturally suggests the colour of the animal itself, not of its trappings; and the only point to be ascer- tained, is, whether the ass is found of a white colour. BufTon informs us, that the colour of the ass is not dun but flaxen, and the belly of a silvery white. In many instances the silvery white predominates ; for Cartw right, who trav- elled into the East, affirms that he beheld on the banks of the Euphrates, great droves of wild beasts, among which were many wild asses all white. Oppian describes the wild ass, as having a coat of silvery white ; and the one which professor Gmelin brought from Tartary, was of the same colour. White asses, according to Morier, come from Arabia ; their scarcity makes them valuable, and gives them consequence. The men of the law count it a dignity, and suited to their character, to ride on asses of this colour. As the Hebrews always appeared in white garments at their public festivals and on days of rejoicing, or when the courts of justice were held ; so, they naturally preferred white asses, because the colour suited the occasion, and because asses of this colour being more rare and costly, were more coveted by the great and wealthy. The same view is taken of this question by Lewis, who says, the asses in Judea " were commonly of a red colour ; and therefore white asses were highly valued, and used by per- sons of superior note and quality." In this passage, he clearly speaks of the colour of the animals themselves, not of their coverings. — Paxton. Ver. 11. They that are delivered from the noise of archers in the places of drawing water. Dr. Shaw mentions a beautiful rill in Barbary, which is received into a large basin, called shrub we krub, drink and away, there being great danger of meeting there with rogues and assassins. If such places are proper for the lurking of murderers in times of peace, they must be proper for the lying in ambush in times of war : a circum- stance that Deborah takes notice of in her song. Judges v. 11. But the writer who is placed first in that collection, which is entitled Gesta Dei per Francos, gives a more perfect comment still on that passage : for, speaking of the want of water, which the Croisade army so severely felt, at the siege of Jerusalem, he complains, that besides their being forced to use water that stunk, arwi barley bread, their people were in continual danger from the Saracens, who, lying hid near all the fountains, and places of water, everywhere destroyed numbers of them, and carried ofi* their cattle. To which may be added a story from William of Tyre, relating to Godfrey, Duke of Lorrain, afterward king of Jerusalem, whxj, stopping short of Antioch five or six miles, to which place he was returning, in order to take some refreshment in a pleasant grassy place near a fountain, was suddenly set upon by a number of horsemen of the enemy, who rushed out of a reedy fenny place near them, and attacked the duke and his people. — Harmer. Ver. 17. Gilead abode beyond Jordan : and Avhy did Dan remain in ships ? Asher continued on the seashore, and abode in his breaches. Though the coast of that part of Syria which is denomi- nated Palestine, is not remarkable for the number of its ports, yet besides Joppa, St. John d'Acre, Caipha under Mount Carmel, and a few others that might be named, there are some creeks, and small convenient places, where little vessels, and such are those that are used for fishing, may shelter themselves, and land what they take, though there are very few rivers on all that coast. To these places Deborah seems to refer, when she says, Asher continued on the seashore, and abode in his breaches, or creeks, as it is translated in the margin. — Harmer, Ver. 21. The river of Kishon swept them away, that ancient river, the river Kishon. O my soul, thou hast trodden down strength. The Kishon, whose furious current swept away the routed legions of Sisera, though mentioned in scripture as a river, is only a small stream, except when swelled by the rain or melting snow. " That ancient river" pursues his course down the middle of the plain of Esdraelon, and then passing close by the side of Mount Carmel, falls into the sea at a place named Caipha. When Maundrell crossed this stream, on his way to Jerusalem, its waters were low and inconsiderable ; but in passing along the side of the plain, he observed the tracts of many tributary rivulets fall- ing down into it from the mountains, by which it must be greatly swelled in the rainy season. It was undoubtedly at the season when the Kishon, replenished by the streams of Lebanon, becomes a deep and impetuous torrent, that the bands of Sisera perishea in its waters. The Kishon, like several other streams in Palestine, does not run with Chap. 6. a full current into the sea, except in the time of the rains, but percolates through the sands which interpose between it and the Mediterranean. It has been immortalized in the song of Deborah and Barak: " The kings came and fought; then fought the kings of Canaan in Tanach by the waters of Megiddo ; they took no gain of money. They fought from heaven; the stars in their courses fought against Sisera." The confederate kings took no gain for money ; they were volunteers in the war, stimulated only by hatred and revenge. But they strove in vain ; the hosts of heaven fought for Israel ; the stars in their courses, against the powerful bands of Jabin. By the malignant influences of the heavenly bodies, by the storms of hail, thunder, and rain, produced, it is probable, by the power, and directed by the sagacity of holy angels, the confident hopes of Sisera were blasted, and a mark of eternal infamy stamped upon his name. From heaven, says the Chaldee Paraphrast, from heaven, the place where the stars go forth, war was commenced against Sisera ; the God of heaven shot forth his arrows, and discomfited the hostile armies; and the river of Kishon, swelled over all its banks by the furious tempests, engaged also in the warfare, by the command of its sovereign Lord, and swept the fugitives awav. For this stroke of vengeance, the Kishon was ordained of old: and this is the reason the inspired bard applies to it the distinguishing epithet in the text : " The river of Kishon swept them away; that ancient river, the river Kishon. O my soul, thou hast trodden down strength."— Paxton. . Ver. 25. He asked water, and she gave him milk ; she brought forth butter in a lordly dish. Though the bowls and dishes of the vulgar Arabs are of wood, those of their emirs are, not unfrequently, of copper, tinned very neatly : La Roque takes notice of this circum- stance in more places than one. I have met with a like account, I think, in other travellers. May we not believe that the vessel which Jael made use of, to present butter- milk to Sisera, and which Deborah in her hymn calls a lordly dish, or a dish oi nobles, was of this sort"? Her hus- band certainly was an Arab emir; the working of metals much more ancient than her time, Gen. iv. 22; and the mere size of the vessel hardly could be the thing intended. La Roque, indeed, tells us, that the fruits that were brought in at the collation, that the grand emir of the Arabs, whom he visited, treated him with, were placed in a large painted basin of wood ; its being painted was, without doubt, a mark of honour set on this vessel of the grand emir, which distinguished it from the wooden bowls of the commonalty; but a painted wooden vessel would have been not so proper for buttermilk, as one of copper tinned, which therefore most probably was the sort Jael used. — Harmer. Speaking of the hospitable manner in which he was received at a house in Tronyen in Norway, Dr. Clarke says, " If but a bit of butter be called for in one of these houses, a mass is brought forth weighing six or eight pounds ; and so highly ornamented, being turned out of moulds, with the shape of cathedrals set off with Gothic spires, and various other devices, that, according to the language of our English farmers' wives, we should deem it almost a pity to cut it. Throughout this part of Norway, the family plate of butter seemed to be the state dish of the house : wherever we sat down to make a meal, this ofFer- T ing was first made, as in the tents of the primeval Arabs, ; when Jael, the wife of Heber the Kenite, brought forth butter in a lordly dish." — Burder. Ver. 30. Have they not sped ? have they not di- vided the prey ; to every man a damsel or two ; to Sisera a prey of divers colours, a prey of di- vers colours of needle-work, of divers colours of needle- work on both sides, meet ioi \h.Q necks of them that take the spoil 1 See on Is. 3. 18. CHAPTER VI. Ver. 19. And Gideon went in, and made ready a kid, and unleavened cakes of an ephah of flour : the flesh he put in a basket, and he put the 18 JUDGES. ISr broth in a pot, and brought it out unto him under the oak, and presented it. All roasted meat is a delicacy among the Arabs, and rarely eaten by them, according to La Roque ; sieit-cd meat also is, according to him, only to be met with among them at feasts, and great tables, such as those of princes, and consequently a delicacy also ; the common diet being only boiled meat, with rice pottage and piliaw. This is agree- able to Dr. Pococke's account of an elegant entertainment he met with at Baalbeck, where he tells us they had for, supper a roasted fowl, piliaw, stewed meat, with the soup, &c. ; and of a grand supper prepared for a great man of Egypt, where he was present, and which consisted, he tells us, of piliaw, a small sheep boiled whole, a lamb roasted in the same manner, roasted fowls, and many dishes of stewed meat in soup, &c. This soup, in which the stewed meat is brought to table, or something very much like it, was, we believe, the broth that Gideon presented to the angei, whom he took Tor a mere mortal messenger of God. Many a reader may have wondered why he should bring out his broth ; they may have been ready to think it would have been better to have kept that within, and have given it to the poor after the supposed prophet, whom he desired to honour, should be withdrawn, but these passages explain it : the broth, as our translators express it, was, I imagine, the stewed savoury meat he had prepared, with such sort of liquor as the eastern people at this day bring their stewed meat in, to the most elegant and honourable tables. What then is meant by the flesh put into the basket, Judg. vi. 19 1 " And Gideon went in, and made ready a kid, and unleavened cakes of an ephah of flour ; the flesh he put in a basket, and he put the broth in a pot, and brought it out to him under the oak, and presented it." The preceding^ quotations certainly do not decipher this perfectly ; but I have been inclmed to think, there is a passage in Dr. Shaw that entirely unravels this matter, and affords a perfect comment on this text. It is in his preface: "Besides a bowl of milk, and a basket of figs, raisins, or dates, which upon our arrival were presented to us, to stay our appetites, the master of the tent where we lodged, fetched us from his flock, according to the number of our company, a kid or a goat, a lamb or a sheep, half of which was immediately seethed by his wife, and served with cuscasoe ; the rest was made kabab, i. e. cut into pieces and roasted; which we reserved for our breakfast or dinner next day." May we not imagine that Gideon presenting some slight refresh- ment to the supposed prophet, according to the present Arab mode, desired him to stay till he could provide some- thing more substantial for him ; that he immediately killed a kid, seethed part of it, made kabab of another part of it, and when it was ready, brought the stewed meat in a pot, with unleavened cakes of bread which he had baked ; and kabab in a basket for his carrying away with him, and serving him for some after repast in his journey 1 Nothing can be more conformable to the present Arab customs, or a more easy explanation of the text ; nothing more conve- nient for thft carriage of the reserved meat than a light basket ; so Thevenot informs us he carried his ready dressed meat with him in a maund. What others may think of the passage I know not, but I never could, till I met with these remarks, account for his bringing the meat out to the angel in a basket. As for Gideon's leaving the supposed prophet under a tree, while he was busied in his house, instead of introducing him into some apartment of his habitation, and bringing the repast out to him there, we have seen some- thing of it under the last observation ; I would here add, that not only Arabs that live in tents, and their dependants, practise it still, but those also that live in houses, as did Gideon. Dr. Pococke frequently observed it among the Maronites, and was so struck with this conformity of theirs to ancient customs, that he could not forbear taking partic- ular notice of it : laymen of quality and ecclesiastics, the patriarchs and bishops, as well as poor obscure priests, thus treating their guests. — Harmer. Ver. 37. Behold, I will put a fleece of wool in the floor ; a7id if the dew be on the fleece only, and it be dry upon all the earth besides, then shall I know that thou wilt save Israel by my hand, I as thou hast said. 138 JUDGES. Chap. 7 In Palestine, as in Greece and Italy, the floor was for the most part in the open air. Thus the thrashing-floor of Gideon appears to have been an open uncovered space, upon which the dews of heaven fell without interruption, "I will put a fleece of wool in the floor, and if the dew be on the fleece only, and it be dry on all the earth besides, then shall I know that thou wilt save Israel by my hand as thou hast said," But a barn, or covered space, had b6en unfit for such an experiment. The thrashing-floor of Araunah the Jebusite, seems also to have been an open area, else it had not been a proper place for erecting an < altar, and offering sacrifice. In the prophecies of Hosea, the idolaters of Israel are compared to the chaff that is driven with the whirlwind out of the floor. Hence it was designed. y prepared in a place to which the wind had free access on all sides ; and from this exposed situation it de- rived its name in Hebrew. In Greece, the same kind of situation was chosen ; for Hesiod advises his farn^^r to thrash his corn in a place well exposed to the wind. From this statement, it appears that a thrashing-floor (rendered in our translation a void place) might .well be formed near the gale of Samaria, which was built on the summit of a hill; and afforded a very convenient place for the kings of Israel and Judah giving audience to the prophets. — Pax- ton. Ver. 38. And it was so : for he rose up early on the morrow, and thrust the fleece together, and wringed the dew out of the fleece, a bowl full of water. It may seem a httle improbable to us who inhabit these northern climates, where the dews are inconsiderable, how Gideon's fleece, in one night, should contract such a quan- tity, that when he came to wring it, a bowl full of water was produced. Irwin, in his voyage up the Red Sea, when on the Arabian shores, says, "difficult as we find it to keep ourselves cool in the daytime, it is no easy matter to defend our bodies from the damps of the night, when the wind is loaded with the heavest dews that ever fell ; we lie exposed to the whole weight of the dews, and the cloaks in which we wrap ourselves, are as wet in the morning as if they had been immersed in the sea." — Burder. Ver. 4. And the Lord said unto Gideon, The people are yet too many; bring them down unto the water, and I will try them for thee there ; and it shall be, that of whom I say unto thee, This shall go with thee, the same shall go with thee ; and of whomsoever I say unto thee, This shall not go with thee, the same shall not go. 5. So he brought down the peo- ple unto the water : and the Lord said unto Gideon, every one that lappeth of the water with his tongue, as a dog lappeth, him shall thou set by himself; likewise every one that boweth down upon his knees to drink. 6. And the number of them that lapped, putting their hand to their mouth, were three hundred men : but all the rest of the people bowed down upon their knees to drink water. The Arabs lap their milk and pottage, but not their water. On the contrary, D'Arvieux tells us, that after they have eaten, they rise from table, and go and drink large draughts out of a pitcher, or, for want of that, out of a leathern bottle, which they hand to one another round and round. Few of ' the Israelites, if they did in common sup their milk and pot- tage out of their hands, as the Arabs do, would have been disposed to lap water in the same manner, if they drank too as the Arabs now drink. Two considerations more will complete the illustration of this part of the history of Gideon. The one is. that the eastern people are not wont to drink standing. Busbequius, the imperial ambassador at Con- stantmople, in his celebrated letters concerning the eastern people, affirms this in a very particular manner ; the other, that the lapping with their hands is a very expe- ditious way of takmg in liquids. " They are not restrained in their choice," says Dr. Russell. " When they take water with the palms of their hands, they naturally places themselves on their hams to be nearer the water; but when they drink from a pitcher, or gourd, fresh filled, they do not sit down on purpose to drink, but drink standing, and very often put the sleeve of their shirt over the mouth of the vessel, by way of strainer, lest small leeches might have been taken up with the water. It is for the same reason they often prefer taking water with the palm of the hand, to the lapping it from the surface. D'Arvieux, in that accu- rate account^ of the Arabs of Mount Carmel, expressly takes notice of this, observing that this may be the reason why spoons are so universally neglected among the Arabs, as a man would eat upon very unequal terms with a spoon, among those that use the palms of their hands instead of them. Until I met with this passage of Busbequius, I could not tell what to make of that particular circumstance of the history of the Jewish judge, that all the rest of the people bowed down upon their knees to drink water. It appeared' to me rather the putting themselves into an attitude to lap water, than any thing else : as I supposed the words signi- fied that they kneeled down by the side of some water in order to drink. But the matter is now clear : three hun- dred men, immediately upon their coming to the water, drank of it in the quickest manner they could, in order to be ready without delay to follow Gideon; the rest took up water in pitchers, or leathern bottles, or some kind of vessel, and bending down so as to sit jointly upon their heels and knees, or with their knees placed upright before them, either of which might be called bowing their knees to drink, though the last is the posture Busbequius refers to, they handed these drinking vessels with ceremony and slowness from one to another, as they were wont to do in common, which occasioned their dismission. So two-and-twenty thousand of those that were faint-hearted were first sent away ; then all the rest, excepting three hundred men of peculiar alacrity and despatch, the most proper for the business for which they were designed, but visibly unequa. to the task of opposing the Midianites ; and without some miraculous interposition of God, absolutely unequal,"-— Harmer, A dbg lappeth by means of forming the end of his tongue into the shape of a shallow spoon, by which he laves or throws up the water into his mouth. The Hottentots have a curious custom, resembhng the dog and the three hun- dred chosen men of Gideon's army. On a journey, imme- diately on coming to water, they stoop, but no farther than what is sufficient to allow their right hand to reach the water, by which they throw it up so dexterously, that their hand seldom approaches nearer to their mouth than a foot ; yet I never observed any of the water to fall down upon their breasts. They perform it almost as quickly a* the dog, and satisfy their thirst in half the time taken by another man, I frequently attempted to imitate this practice, but never succeeded, always spilling the water on my clothes, or throwing it against some other part of the face, instead of the mouth, which greatly amused the Hottentot spectators, who then, perhaps for the first time, perceived that there was some art in it, — African Light. CHAPTER Vn. Ver. 12. And the Midianites, and the AmaleKites, and all the children of the East, lay along in the valley like grasshoppers for multitude ; and their camels were without number, as the sand by the seaside for multitude. This animal remembers an injury long, and seizes witn great keenness a proper opportunity of revenge. A camel's anger is, among the Arabians, a proverb for an irreconci- lable enmity. They estimate their riches by the number of their camels. They can sustain great labour and fatigue upon the poorest means of subsistence ; travelling four or five days without water, while half a gallon of beans and barley, or a few balls made of the flour, will sustain him f )r a whole day. Dr. Shaw says, that before drinking, they disturb the water with their feet, first of all thrusting their heads a great way above the nostrils into the water, and then, after the manner of pigeons, make several successive draughts. " Nature has furnished the camel with parts and qualities adapted to the office he is employed to discharge, Chap. 7—9. JUDGES. 139 The driest thistle and the barest thorn is all the food this useful quadruped requires; and even thise, to save time, he eats while advancing on his journey, without stopping, or occasioning a moment of delay. As it is his lot to cross immense deserts, where no water is found, and countries not even moistened with the dew of heaven, he is endued ■with the power, at one watering-place, to lay in a store, with which he supplies himself for thirty days to come. To contain this enormous quantity of fluid, nature has formed large cisterns within him, from which, once filled,: he draws at pleasure the quantity he wants, and pours it into his stomach, with the same effect as if he then drew it from a spring; and with this he travels patiently and vig- orously all day long ; carrying a prodigious load upon him, through countries infected with poisonous winds, and glow- ing with parching and never-cooling sands." (Bruce.)— BUHDER. Ver. 13. And when Gideon was come, behold, i there was a man that told a dream unto his fel- low, and said, Behold, I dreamed a dream, and, lo, a cake of barley-bread tumbled into the host of Midian, and came unto a tent, and smote it that it fell, and overturned it, that the tent lay- along. Barley-bread is in some regions of Persia commonly used by the lower orders. It must not however be omitted, that in making bread, barley was used before any other sort of corn ; for it is reported, says Artemidorus, that this was the first food which the gods imparted to mankind ; and it was, according to Pliny, the most ancient sort of pro- vision. But in more civilized ages, to use the words of the same author, barley-bread came to be the food of beasts only ; yet it was still used by the poorer sort, who were not able to furnish their tables with better provisions; and in the Roman camp, as Vegetius and Livy inform us, soldiers who had been guilty of any offence, were fed with barley, instead of bread corn. An example of this punishment is recorded in the history of the second Punic war. The cohorts that lost their standards, had an allowance of bar- ley assigned by Marcellus. And Augustus Cesar com- monly punished the cohorts which gave way to the enemy, by a decimation, and allowing them no provision but barley. So mean and contemptible, in the estimation of the numer- ous and well-appointed armies of Midian,. was Gideon, with his handful of undisciplined militia ; but guided by the wisdom, and supported by the power of the living God, he inflicted a deserved and exemplary punishment on these proud oppressors. The meagre barley-cake was put into the hand of Midian by the God of armies, as a punishment for disobedience of orders, not to make a full end of his j chosen people. " And when Gideon was come, behold, there was a man that told a dream unto his fellow, and said. Behold, I dreamed a dream, and lo, a cake of barley- bread tumbled into the host of Midian, and came unto a tent, and smote it that it fell, and overturned it, that the tent lay along. And his fellow answered and said. This is nothing else save the sword of Gideon, the son of Joash, a man of Israel ; for into his hand hath God delivered Midian, and all the host." — Paxton. Ver. 16. And he divided the three hundred men into three companies, and he put a trumpet in every man's hand, with empty pitchers, and lamps within the pitchers. Though it must, one would think, be much more con- venient to carry water in skins or leathern bottles, when water must be carried, and accordingly, such we find are generally made use of in the East in travelling; yet, what- ever the cause may be, they sometimes content themselves with earthen jars. Thus we find, in the beginning of Dr. Chandler's expeditions, in search of the antiquities of these countries, though he was equipped under the direction of a Jew of that countrv, of such eminence as to act as the Brit- ish consul at the JDardanelles, and was attended at first by him, yet the vessel in which their water was to be carried, was an earthen jar, which not only served them in the wherry in which they coasted some of the nearer parts of Asia Minor, but was carried upon the ass of a poor peasant, along with other luggage, when they made an excursion from the seaside up into the country, to visii the gieat luin at Troas. This may serve to remove our wonder thai Gideon should be able to collect three hundred water-jars from among ten thousand men, for we have no reason to suppose the method he was to make use of, to surprise the Midianites, was not suggested to him before he dismissed all the army to the three hundred. In an army of ten thousand Israelitish peasants, collected together on a sudden, there might be many goat-skin vessels for water, but many might have nothing better than earthen jars, and three hundred water-jars, collected from the whole army, were sufficient to answer the views of divine Providence. — Harmer. CHAPTER VIII. Ver. 7. And Gideon said, Therefore, when the Lord hath delivered Zebah and Zalmunna into my hand, then I will tear your flesh Avith the thorns of the wilderness, and with briers. Thus did Gideon threaten the inhabitants of Succoth ; and thus do masters, fathers, and schoolmasters, swear they will punish, those who have offended them. To see the force of the figure, it must be kept in mind that the people are almost in a state of nudity. To tear a man's naked body, therefore, with briers and thorns, would be no small punishment. See poor travellers sometimes, who, in consequence of a wild beast, or some other cause, have to rush into the thicket ; before they can get out again, in con-, sequence of thorns, they are literally covered Avith blood. There have been instances where a master, in his anger,, has taken the jagged edge of the palmirah branch, to tear the naked body of his slave, and nothing can be more common than to threaten it shall be done to those who have given offence. People also often menace each other with the repetition of the old punishment of tying the naked body in a bundle of thorns, and rolling it on the ground. — Roberts. This threat probably relates to a cruel method of torture used in those times for putting captives to death, by laying briers and thorns on their naked bodies, and then drawing- over them some heavy implements of husbandry. Drij- sius thinks, that pensons put to death in this manner were laid naked on thorns and briers, and then trampled on. — BURDER. Ver. 18. As ihoxxart, so wer eihey\ each one re- sembled the children of a king. Of a person who is beautiful or of a fair complexion, who is courageous and stately in his gait, it is said in the East, " He is like the son of a king." " He is as the so\\ of Mannaaihon (Cupid.") " He is the ^on of a god." — Roberts. CHAPTER IX. Ver. 8. The trees went forth on a time to anoinl a king over them ; and they said unto the olivv-^.- tree. Reign thou over us. The people of the East are exceedingly addicted to apo- logues, and use them to convey instruction or reproof, which with them could scarcely be done so well in any other way. Has a man been told a secret, he says, in re- peating it, for instance, " A tree told me this morning, that Kandan offered a large bribe to the Modeliar, lo get Mut- too turned out of his situation." Does a man of low caste wish to unite his son in marriage to the daughter of one who is high, the latter will say, " Have you heard that the pumpkin wants to be married to the plantain tree"?" Is a wife steril, " The cocoa-nut tree in Viraver's garden does not bear any fruit." Has a woman had children by im- proper intercourse, it is said of her husband's garden, " Ah, the palmirah-trees are now giving cocoa-nuts." Has a man given his daughter in marriage to another who uses her unkindly, he says, " I have planted the sugar- cane by the side of the margossa (bitter) tree." — Roberts. Ver. 27. And they went out into the fields, and gathered their vineyards, and trode the grafes^^ 140 JUDGES. Chap. 9— 11. and made merry, and went into the house of their god, and did eat and drink, and cursed Abimelech. In the East they still tread their grapes after the ancient manner. " August 20, 1765, the vintage (near Smyrna) was now begun, the juice (of the grapes) was expressed for wine ; a man, with his feet and legs bare, was treading the fruit in a kind of cistern, with a hole or vent near the bot- tom, and a vessel beneath to receive the liquor." (Chand- ler's Travels in Greece.) — Border. Ver. 33. Then may est thou do to them as thou shalt find occasion. The Hebrew has, " As thy hand shall find." (1 Sam. X. 7, margin.) In asking a favour, it is common to say, *' You must not deny me, sir ; but as your hand finds op- portunity, so you must assist me." — " Well, my friend, when I have the opportunity of the hand, I will assist you." " The man has assisted me according to the opportimity of his hand ; what can he do more V — Roberts, Ver. 36. And when Gaal saw the people, he said to Zebul, Behold, there come people down from the top of the mountains. And Zebul said unto him, Thou seest the shadow of the mount- ains as if they were men. Our translation of the book of Judges, from the Hebrew, represents Zebul as saying to Gaal, upon his being alarm- ed at seeing troops of men making to him. Thou seest the skadows of Uve mountains as if they were men; whereas, Josephus represents him as telling him, he mistook the shadow of the rocks for men. A commentator might be at a loss to account for this change, that had not read Doub- dan's representation of some part of the Holy Land, in which he tells us, that in those places there are many de- tached rocks scattered up and down, some growing out of the ground, and others are fragments, broken ofi' from rocky precipices, the shadow of which, it appears, Jose- pljus thought might be most naturally imagined to look like troops of men at a distance, rather than the shadow of the mountains. — Shaw. The dreariness of the far-stretching ruins was dismally increased by the shadowy hour of our approach; and be- ing again in the region of the Bactriani descents, our own flitting shades, as we passed between old mouldering walls and the moonlight, sometimes bore an alarming interpre- tation. Our mehmander was ready to embattle every frowning heap with a murderous legend. — Sir R, K. Por- TEE. CHAPTER X. Ver. 4. And he had thirty sons that rode on thirty ass-colts, and they had thirty cities, which are called Havoth-jair unto this day, which are in the land of Gilead. To ride upon an ass was, in the days of the Judges, a mark of distinction, to which it is probable the vulgar might not presume to aspire. This is evident from the brief notices which the inspired historian gives of the great- ness and richness of Jair, the Gileadite, one of these judges : " he had thirty sons that rode on thirty ass-colts; and they had thirty cities, which are called Havoth-jair unto this day. " Abdon the Pirathonite, another of these judges, '• had forty sons and thirty nephews, that rode on three- score and ten ass-colts. " It is reasonable to suppose, that the manners and customs of the chosen tribes underwent a change when the government became monarchical, and the fascinating pleasures of a court began to exert their usual influence; still, however, the ass kept his place in the service of the great, Mephibosheth, the grandson of Saul, rode on an ass ; as did Ahithophel, the prime minister of David, and the greatest statesman of that age. Even no late as the reign of Jehoram, the son of Ahab, the services of this animal were required by the wealthy Israelite : the Shunamite, a person of high rank, saddled her ass, and ifode to Carmel, the residence of Elisha, to announce the death of her son to the prophet, and to solicit his assist- ance. — Paxton, Ver. 8. And that year they vexed and oppressed the children of Israel eighteen years. The Hebrew has, " crushed." Of a severe master it is said, " He crushes his servants. " " Ah ! my lord, crush me not." "When will the king cease to crush his peo- y pie 7 " — Roberts, CHAPTER XI. Ver. 30. And Jephthah vowed a vow unto the Lord, and said. If thou shalt without fail de- liver the children of Ammon into my hands, 31. Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord's, and I will offer it up for a burnt-offering. One species of vow called Cherem, (for which, in Ger- man, we generally use the terms Bann, Verbannen, &c. ; but in a thing altogether foreign to us, I rather choose to abide by the Hebrew word,) was, from ancient usage, more sacred and irremissible than all others. Moses nowhere mentions what Cherem was, nor by what solemnities or expressions it was distinguished from other vows ; but pre- supposes all this as already well known. But from Lev. xxvii. 21, every one must see, that there was a difference between a Cherem and other vows ; for if a man had vow- ed his field, and omitted to redeem it, it devolved unto God in the same way as the field of Cherem, for ever, and be- yond the power of future redemption ; and in ver. 28, 29, it is expressly ordained, that a Cherem can never be re- deemed like other vows, but continues consecrated to God ; and if it be a man, that he shall be put to death. I have al- ready stated, that of the formalities which distinguished the Cherem from common vows, we know nothing ; nor does the etymology of the term at all aid our conjectures, for the radical word in Arabic means, to consecrate ; but every thing vowed or devoted, was consecrated. The species of Cherem with which we are best acquainted, was the previ- ous devotement to God of hostile cities, against which they intended to proceed with extreme severity ; and that wiih a view the more to inflame the minds of the people to war. In such cases, not only were all the inhabitants put to death, but also, according as the terms of the vow declared, no booty was made by any Israelite ; the beasts were slain ; what would not burn, as gold, silver, and other metals, was added to the treasure of the sanctuary ; and every thing else, with the whole city, burnt, and an imprecation pro- nounced upon any attempt that should ever be made to re- build it. Of this tJie history of Jericho (Josh. vi. 17—19, 21—24, and vii. 1, 12—26) furnishes the most remarkable example. In Moses' lifetime we find a similar vow against the king of Arad, Numb. xxi. 1 — 3. The meaning, how- ever, as we see from the first-mentioned example, was not, that houses might never again be built on the accursed spot; for to build a city, here means to fortify it. Joshua him- self seems to explain it thus ; for in his curse he makes use of this expression, " Cursed be he who rebuilds this city Jericho ; for his first-born son shall he found it, and for his latest, set up its gates." The beginning, therefore, of the building of a city, is to found it ; which can hardly be to lay the foundation stone of a single house, (for who, whether Hebrew or not, ever called that founding a city 1) but of the city walls; and its conclusion, isto set up its gates. The history still further confirms this, as the meaning of the term to build ; Jericho was so advantageously situated for all manner of trade, because near the usual passage a,cross the Jordan, that it could not long remain a place en- tirely desolate. In fact, as early as the time of the Judges, Jericho, or, as it was then called, the city of palms, ap-^ peared again as a town, subdued by the Moabites; (Judg.l iii. 13, compared with Deut. xxxiv. 3;) and in David's time, | we have unquestionable proof of ti e existence of a city of* the name of Jericho. See 2 Sam. x. 5. But notwithstand- ing all this, Joshua's imprecation was not yet trespassed; but, at least 100 years after David's death, Jericho was first rebuilt (that is, fortified) by Hiel the Bethelite ; and in lay- Chap. 12. JUDGES. 141 ing its foundation he lost his first-born son, and in setting up the gates, his youngest, 1 Kings xvi. 34. If an Israelitish city introduced the worship of strange gods, it was in like manner to be devoted, or consecrated to God, and to remain unrebuilt for ever ; Deul. xiii. 16 — 18. In these cases, therefore, consecrated, or devoted, is nearly equivaleu. to the Latin phrase, ejus caput Jovi sacrum esto, or sacer esto. The consecration of the transgressor to God made the remission of his punishment impossible. It is easy to perceive, that this master-piece of legislative policy- ought never to have its importance lessened by an injudi- cious application to common crimes, that do not affect the principles of the constitution : and therefore, so much the greater was the abuse which Saul made of the Cherem, when, in issuing an arbitrary inconsiderate order, he swore that whoever trespassed it should die ; this was, in fact, making the offender against his whim, a Cherem ; and ac- cordingly we see, that the people did not mind the oath of their king, but insisted on saving Jonathan, whom, because he had eaten a little honey, his father had devoted to death. 1 Sam. xiv. 24 — 45. But a still grosser abuse of the Che- rem, proceeding from imitation of foreign and heathenish practices, w^e shall probably find in the history of Jephthah, ' Judges, chap. xi. This brave barbarian, an illegitimate child, and without inheritance, who had from his youth i been a robber, and was now, from being the leader of ban- ditti, transformed into a general, had vowed, if he con- j quered the Ammonites, to make a burnt-offering to the \ Lord of whatever should first come out of his house to meet '< him, on his return. This vow was so absurd, and at the i same time so contrary to the Mosaic law, that it could not j possibly have been accepted of God, or obligatory. For, what if a dog, or an ass, had first met him"? Could he have offered it ? By the law of Moses no unclean beast could be brought to the altar ; nor yet even all clean ones ; but of quadrupeds, only oxen, sheep, and goats. Or, what if a man had first met him"? Human sacrifices Moses had most rigidly prohibited, and described as the abomination of the Canaanites ; of which we shall afterward say more, under criminal law ; but Jephthah, who had early been driven from his home, and had grown up to manhood among banditti in the land of Tob, might not know much of the laws of Moses, and probably was but a bad lawyer, and jqst as bad a theologian. The neighbouring nations used human sacrifices: the Canaanites, especially, are hy Moses and the other sacred writers often accused of this abominable idolatry, of which we find still more in the Greek and Latin authors ; and possibly, therefore, Jephthah, when he made the vow, may have thought of being met, not merely by a beast, but by a slave, whom,, of course, he would sacrifice, after the heathen fashion. His words are, " If thou givest the Ammonites into my hands, whatever first Cometh forth from my house to meet me on my happy return from the Ammonites, shall be the Lord's, and I will bring it to him as a burnt-offering." — Most unfortunately, his only daughter first came out to congratulate him : and I the ignorant barbarian, though extremely afl^ected at the ! sight, was yet so superstitious, and so unacquainted with the religion and laws of his country, as to suppose he could not recall his vow. His daughter too was heroic enough to fulfil it, on her part ; requesting only two months respite, for the romantic purpose of going with her com- panions into lonely dales, there to lament that she must die a virgin. Then, after two months' absence, this hap- less maid, who, either from ambition or superstition, was a willing victim to her father's inconsiderate vow, actually returned ; and Jephthah, it is said, did with her as he had vowed ; which cannot well mean any thing else, than that he put her to death, and burnt her body as a burnt-offering. The greater number of expositors, indeed, would fain ex- plain the passage differently, because they look upon Jeph- thah as a saint, who could not have done any thing so abom- inable. " Human sacrifices," say they, " are clearly con- trary to the law of Moses."— Very true. — But how many tilings have ignorance and superstition done in the world, thai expressly contradict the law of God ! Have we not, among Christians, seen persecutions and massacres on ac- , count of religion, with various other atrocities, and abom- inable proceedings, that are just as directly repugnant to the gospel, as any human sacrifice could be to the laws of ] Moses 1—" But would the high-priest have accepted such !j an offering, and brought it to the altar V'—l certainly be- lieve not ; but we find not a word spoken of the high-priest, but only of Jephthah. What if he had performed the sacri- fice himself? This would certainly have been a trans- gression of the Levitical law ; which enjoined that every offering should be made by the hand of the priest, and at the place where the tabernacle and altar stood. But that injunction had, on numberless occasions, been violated by the Israelites, and had, by the opposite usage, become al- most abrogated. Jephthah, who, from superstitious igno- rance, was, in the sacrifice of his daughter, after the Ca- naanitish fashion, about to perpetrate a most abominable act, forbidden not only by the law of his country, but also by the law of nature, might very well have been guilty of the lesser fault, now actually a very common one, of ma- king his offering in the country beyond Jordan, of which he was himself master. Amid all the doubts that we start concerning this clearly-related story, we do not consider who Jephthah was ; a fugitive from his country, who, in for- eign lands, had collected and headed a band of robbers; nor yet where he now ruled,-^beyond Jordan, in the land of Gilead. And a still more important circumstance men- tioned in the chapter (xii.) immediately following our sto- ry, has been most inadvertently overlooked. Immediately after his victory over the Ammonites, Jephthah went to war with the tribe of Ephraim : but the tabernacle was at Shi- loh, within the limits of that tribe ; and the .high-priest, therefore, could certainly have had no concern with an of- fering that Jephthah meant to make on account of his suc- cess, nor would it have been brought to the altar at Shiloh, but made in the land where Jephthah himself ruled. It is unaccountable, that not a single expositor should have at- tended to this war with the Ephraimites : but that the one half of them should be so simple as to deny, that Jephthah did offer up his daughter, because the high-priest would not have accepted the offering: and the other, in other respects more correct in their opinion, so obliging, as to obviate that objection, by presuming that the high-priest must have been deposed for making such an offering. — This, however, is a controversy into which I will not enter further, because it does not deserve it. That carelessness is too gross, which forgets the end of the eleventh chapter, at the beginning of the twelfth. — Michaelis. CHAPTER XII. Ver. 3. And when I saw that ye delivered me not, I put my life in my hancls, and passed over against the children of Ammon. The Ephraimites had found fault with Jephthah because he did not call them to war against the Ammonites, but he vindicated himself, and addressed them in the language of the verse, as a proof of his courage, and that he had been exposed to danger. The Hindoos use the same figure ; and the idea appears to be taken from a man carrying some- thing very precious in his hands, and that under circum- stances of great danger. When a son who has been long absent returns home, his father says, " My son has returned from the far country with his life in his hand;" which means, he has passed through many dangers. " Last night, as I went home through the place of evil spirits, I put my life in my hands." " The other day, in passing through the forest, I put my life in my hands, for the beasts were near to me in every direction." " Danger ! truly so ; I put my life in my bosom." " O that divine doctor! my son was at the point of death, but he brought his life in his hand." — Roberts, Ver. 14. And he had forty sons, and thirty nephews, that rode on threescore and ten ass- colts : and he judged Israel eight years. To an Englishman, this may appear almost incredible, but we have a great number of similar cases. A man oi property has as many wives as he thinks proper to support; and such is the state of morals, that he finds no difficulty in procuring them. I have known men who have had, in each of the neighbouring villages, a wife or concubine. Santherasega, Modeliar of Oodeputty, who has been dead about thirty vears, had two wives and six concubines, who bare to him thirty children. The old man is described as being of large stature, and as having indulged in strong ' 143 JUDGES. Chap. 13. 14. kinds of food. — A friend of mine in Manilla knew a man who was the father of forty children. — Lieutenant-colonel Johnson says (in his ' Travels through Persia) of the king, " The number of his cidldren I could not exactly ascertain: it is generally agreed that he has at least sixty boys and sixty girls living ; and many persons add, that there are an equal number deceased, so that their total number must kave been two hundred and forty. He has already given HI marriage twelve of his daughters ; and about twenty-five of the elder of his sons are governors of the principal prov- inces and cities of the empire. Preparations of fireworks, &c. were at this time making at the palace to celebrate the nuptials of one of his sons, which were to take place in about three weeks." — Roberts. CHAPTER XIII. Yer. 5. For, lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son ; and no razor shall come on his hea^ : for the child shall be a Nazarite unto God from the womb. Tbis command was given to the wife of Manoah, the fatLt 1- of Samson, who had previously been steril. Han- nah, the mother of Samuel, was also steril, " and she vowed a v-iw, and said, O Lord of hosts, if thou wilt indeed look on -ne affliction of thy handmaid, and remember me, and not forget thy handmaid, but will give unto thy hand- maid a man-child, then I will give him unto the Lord all the ays of his life, and there shall no razor come upon his head." (Numbers vi. 5. Acts xviii. 18.) All who are married in the East, have an intense desire for children. It is considered disgraceful, and a mark of the displeasure of the gods, to have a childless house. Under these cir- cumstances, husbands and wives perform expensive cere- monies ; and vow, that should the gods favour them with a son, " no razor shall come upon his head," (i. e. except- ing "the corners,") until he shall be ten or twelve years of age. In all schools, boys may be seen with elf-locks of ten jr twelve' years standing, giving a testimony to the solicitude, superstition, and affection of the parents, and a memorial of the favour of their deities. — Roberts. Ver. 1":^ So Manoah took a kid with a meat- ofTeriij?-, and offered it upon a rock unto the Lord: and the angel did wonderously ; and ManoaVt and his wife looked on. 20. For it came tc pass, when the flame went up towards heaven ^ua:, off the altar, that the ang-el of the Lord asceii':ied in the flame of the altar : and Manoah and his wife looked on it, and fell on their faces to the ground. The circumstances in the histories of Gideon and Manoah are well illustrated, by some things mentioned occasionally by Doubdan, in the account of his journey to the Holy- Land, for he speaks of many rocks which he found rising up out of the earth there, and some as parts of great rocks fallen down. Some of them are described in such a manner, as shows they resembled altar-tombs, or altars. Speaking of his return from a town called St. Samuel, to Jerusalem, by a way leading to the sepulchres of the judges of Israel, he tells us, (p. 98, 99,) that he found them in a great field planted with vines, in which were great rocks, which rose out of the earth ; among them, one, near the wayside, was so large, as to be hollowed out into several rooms, in whose sides were long and narrow holes cut out, proper for placing the dead in, even with the floor. When he was at Joppa, waiting to embark, upon his return, he describes himself and his companion as placing them- sei'.vs, after they had walked until they were tired, on the beach, viewing some Greek pilgrims, who were also wait- ing to take ship, and who amused themselves with dancing on the shore, as placing themselves in the shade of a great rock, newly fallen down from the moimtains, (p. 4.5.5.) Rocks appear in this countrv : some in their original situ- ation, rising out of the ground ; others are fragments, that have been detached from rockv eminences, and have fallen down on the ground below. Of this considerable number of rocks, some were flat, or nearly flat, on the top, so as conveniently to be used for altars. There are some such now found in that country. — Burder. CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 7. And he went down and talked with the woman ; and she pleased Samson well. 8. And after a time he returned to take her. Ten or twelve months commonly intervened between the ceremony of espousals, and the marriage ; during this interval, the espoused wife continued with her parents, that she might provide herself with nuptial ornaments suitable to her station. This custom serves to explain a circumstance in Samson's marriage, which is involved in some obscurity: " He went down," says the historian, " and talked with the woman, (whom he had se^n at Timnath,) and she pleased him well." These words seem to refer to the ceremony of espousals ; the following to the subsequent marriage, " And after a time he returned to take her."' Hence, a considerable time intervened between the espou- sals, and their actual union. — Paxton. V^er. 8. And, behold, there was a swarm of bees and honey in the carcass of the lion. The bee is a gregarious insect, living in a state of society, and subject to a regular government. From this circumstance, its Hebrew name mm, from a root which signifies to speak, to rule, to lead, is derived. It is an opinion commonly received among the ancients, that bees were propagated in two ways, either by those of their own species, or in the cavities of a dead carcass. Their opinion is beautifully stated by Virgil in these lines : "Hie vero subitum ac dictu mirablle monstrum Aspiciunt, liquefacta boum per viscera t.oto Stridere apes utero et ruptis effervere costis, Immensas que trahi nubes jamque arbore summa Confluere, et lentis uvam demittere ramis." *' But here they behold a sudden prodigy, and wondrous to relate, bees through all the belly, burn amid the putrid bowels of the cattle, pour forth with the fermenting juices from the burst sides, and in immense clouds roll .along, then swarm together on the top of a tree, and hang down in a cluster from the bending boughs." This opinion, however, is directly contradicted by another, which was held by some writers of the greatest reputation in ancient times. Aristotle taught, that the bee will not light upon a dead carcass, nor taste the flesh. Varro asserts, that she never sits down in an unclean place, or upon any thing which emits an unpleasant smell. They are never seen, like flies, feeding on blood or flesh ; while wasps and hornets all delight in such food, the bee never touches a dead body. So much they dislike an impure smell, that when one of them dies, the survivors immediately carry out the carcass from the hive, that they may not be aii- noyed by the effluvia. The discovery which Samson made, when he went down to Timnath, may seem to contradict the latter, and confirm the former opinion : " And after time, he returned to take her, and he turned aside to se the carcass of the lion ; and behold there was a swarm oi_ bees, and honey in the carcass of the lion." But it is not" said the swarm was generated there, but only that Samson found them in the carcass ; nor is it said that the lion had been recently killed, and that the carcass was in a state o£ putrefaction: the contrary seems to be intimated by the phrase after a time, literally, after days, one of the most common expressions in scripture for a year. Hence the lion was killed a whole year before this visit to Timnath, when he discovered the swaim in the carcass. But the flesh of the carcass, which Samson lefl in the open field at whole year, the prey of wild beasts and ravenous birds" must have been entirely consumed long before his return or so completely dried by the violent heat of the sun, tha' n thing but the skeleton, or exsiccated frame, remained. Within the bare, or withered enclosure of the bones, which had exhaled their last putrid effluvia, the swarm, in perfect consistency with their usual delicacy, might construct their cells and deposite their honey. This conjecture is con- firmed by the testimony of Herodotus, who declares thai bees have swarmed in dry bones. — Paxton. i I Chap. 15. JUDGES. 143 Ver. 12. And Samson said unto them, I will now put forth a riddle unto you : if ye can certainly declare it me within the seven days of the feast, and find it out, then I will give you thirty shefets and thirty change of garments. It is customary for the Turks and Moors, according to Dr. Shaw, to wear shins of linen, or cotton, or gauze, under their tunics ; but the Arabs wear nothing but wool- len. This is frequently the case also with the Arabs of Palestine, it seems, though D'Arvieux gives a contrary ac- count of the Arabs of the camp of the grand emir whom he visited ; for Egmont and Heyman assure us, that they saw several Arabian inhabitants of Jaffa going along al- most naked, the greatest part of them without so much as a shirt or a pair of breeches, though some wore a kind of a mantle; as for the children there, they ran about almost as naked as they were born, though they had all little chains about their legs as an ornament, and some of silver. — Har- JVIER. Many of the Arabian inhabitants of Palestine and Bar- bary wear no shirts, but go almost entirely naked, or with only a cloth cast about their bodies, or a kind of mantle. It is not improbable, that the poorer inhabitants of Judea were clothed in much the same manner as the Arabs of those countries in modern times, having no shirts, but only a sort of mantle to cover their naked bodies. If this be just, it greatly illustrates the promise of Samson to give his companions thirty sheets, or, as it is more properly rendered in the margin of our Bibles, thirty shirts, if they could dis- cover the meaning of his riddle. It cannot easily be im- agined they were what we call sheets, for Samson might have slain thirty Philistines near Askelon, and not have found one sheet ; or if he slew them who were carrying their beds with them on their travels, as they often do in present times, the slaughter of fifteen had been sufficient, for in the East, as in other countries, every bed is provided with two sheets; but he slew just thirty, in order to obtain thirty sediuim, or shirts. If this meaning of the term be admitted, the deed of Samson must have been very provo- king to the Philistines ; for since only people of more easy circumstances wore shirts, they were not thirty of the com- mon people that he slew, but thirty persons of figure and consequence. The same word is used by the prophet Isaiah, in his description of the splendid and costly dress in which people of rank and fashion then delighted, ren- dered in our translation fine linen ; which seems to place it beyond a doubt that they were persons of rank that fell tby the hand of Samson on that occasion. But it is by no means improbable, that these sheets were the hykes or blankets already described, which are worn by persons of all ranks in Asia. (See on Deut. 24. 13.) Pococke, who gives a description of this vestment, and of the way in which it is wrapped about the body, which does not materially differ from the account of it in a preceding section, particularly observed, that the young people, and the poorer -ort about Faiume, had nothing on whatever, but this blanket; hence it is probable, that the young man was clothed in this manner who followed our Saviour when he was taken, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body. " When the young man," who came to apprehend Jesiis, " laid hold of" him, " he left the linen cloth, and fled ^rom them naked:" but this language by no means re- f 'quires us to suppose that he was absolutely naked, but only that he chose rather to quit his hyke or plaid, than run the risk of being made a prisoner, although by doing so he , became unduly exposed. This view is confirmed by the observations formerly made on the hyke and tunic; and by the state of the weather, which was" so cold, that the ser- vants of the high-priest were compelled to kindle a fire in ! the midst of the hall to warm themselves. It is very im- probable, that he would go into the garden on such a night so thinly clothed; and we have no reason to think he was so poor, that this linen cloth was the only article of clothing j in his possession. But Mr. Harmer, and other expositors, I considering that the apostles were generally poor men, and I that the poor in those countries had often no other covering tthan this blanket, rather suppose, that the terrified disciple \ lied away in a state of absolute nudity. But if it was the I apostle John, where was he furnished with clothes to 1 appear almost immediatelv after in the high-priest's hall 7 This difficulty Mr. Harmer endeavours to remove by sup- posing, that from the garden he might go to his usual place of residence in the city, and clothe himself anew before he went to the palace. — Paxton. Ver. 15. And it came to pass on the seventh day, that they said to Samson's wife. Entice thy husband, that he may declare unto us the rid- dle, lest we burn thee and thy father's house with fire : have ye called us to take that we have ? is it not so ? The marriage feast was of old, frequently protracted to the length of seven days ; for so long Samson entertained his friends at Timnath.' To this festival, Laban is thought by many divines to refer, in his answer to Jacob's com- plaint, that he had imposed Leah upon him instead of Rachel; "Fulfil the week of the marriage, and we will give thee this also." This feast was callea the nuptial joy, with which no other was to be intermixed; all labour ceased while it continued, and no sign of mourning or sor- row was permitted to appear. It may be only further observed, tnat even in modern times, none but very poor people give a daughter in marriage without a female slave for a handmaid, as hired servants are scarcely known in the oriental regions. Hence Laban, who was a man of considerable property in Mesopotamia, "gave unto his daughter Leah, Zilpah his maid, for a handmaid;" and " to Rachel his da^jghter, Bilhah his handmaid, to be her maid." In Greece also, the marriage solemnity lasted several days. On the third day, the bride presented her bridegroom with a robe ; gifts were likewise made to the bride and bridegroom, by the bride's father and friends ; these consisted of golden vessels, beds, couches, plates, ami all sorts of necessaries for housekeeping, which were car- ried in great state to the house by women, preceded by a person carrying a basket, in the manner usual at proces- sions, before whom went a boy in white vestments, with a torch in his hand. It was also customary for the bride- groom and his friends to give presents to the bride, after which, the bridegroom had leave to converse freely with her, and she was permitted to appear in public without her veil. The money, says Dr. Russell, which the bridegrooms of Aleppo pay for their brides, is laid out in furniture for a chamoer, in clothes, jewels, or ornaments of gold, for the bride, whose father makes some addition, according to his circumstances : which things are sent with great pomp to the bridegroom's house three days before the wedding. — Paxton. Ver. 16. And he said unto her, Behold, I have not told it my father nor my mother, and shall ItelHnhee? In all parts of the world, I believe, people are pretty much aliKe as to their capability of keeping secrets. The Hindoos, however, improperly reflect upon the female sex in their proverb, " To a woman tell not a secret." . That secret must be great indeed which will prevent a son or daughter from telling it to the father or mother. The greatest proof of confidence is to say, " I have told you what I have not revealed to my father." In proof of the great affection one has for another, it is said, "He has told things to him that he would not have related to his parents." "My friend, do tell me the secret." — "Tell youl yes, when I have told my parents." — Roberts, CHAPTER XV. Ver. 4. And Samson went and caught three hun- dred foxes, and took firebrands, and turned tail to tail, and put a firebrand in the midst be- tween two tails. The book of Judges contains a singular anecdote, of the mischief which Samson did by means of this animal to the property of his enemies. He " went and caught three hun- dred foxes, and took firebrands, and turned tail to fail, and put a firebrand in the midst, between two tails ; and when he had set the brands on fire, he let them go into the stand- ing corn of the Philistines, and burnt up both tte shocks, 144 JUDGES. Chap. 16. and also the standing corn, with the vineyards and olives." On reading this curious statement, the infidel asks with an air of triumph, How could Samson procure so many foxes m so short a time 1 To this question it may be answered, the concurring testimony of travellers clearly proves, that the land of promise abounded with foxes. The same fact is suggested by the prediction of David, that his enemies .should become the prey of foxes ; and by the invitation of Solomon already quoted from the Song. Some districts and cities in that country, take their name from the fox ; a sure proof of their numbers in those parts : " Thus, the land of Shual, mentioned in the first book of Samuel, sig- nifies the land of the fox ;" and Hazarshual, the name of a city, belonging to the tribe of Judah, or Simeon, means the fox's habitation. Besides, the term foxes, in the opinion of Bochart, embraces the thoes, a species of wolf, which very much resemble the fox, and are extremely numerous in Judea, particularly about Cesarea. Bellonius asserts, that they may be seen in troops of two or three hundred, prowling about in quest of their prey ; and Morizon, who travelled in Palestine, says, that foxes swarm in that coun- try, and that very great numbers of them lurk in hedges and in ruinous buildings. To find so many of these ani- mals, therefore, could be no great difficulty io a person ac- customed to the chase, as this renowned Israelite may be reasonably supposed to have been. Nor is it said, that Samson caught all these foxes in one, or even in two days ; a whole week, or even a month, might be spent in the cap- ture, for any thing that appears to the contrary. Add to this, that,' although Samson himself m%ht be a most expert hunter, we have no reason to think he caught all these ani- mals alone. So eminent a personage as the chief magis- trate of Israel might employ as many people as he pleased, in accomplishing his purpose. When, for example, it is said, that Solomon built the temple at Jerusalem, no man supposes, that he executed the work with his own hands ; he only caused the work to be done : and, in the same man- ner, Samson may be said to do what he only commanded to be done, or assisted in doing. Nor can it be reasonably denied, that the God who made the world, and by his spe- cial providence, watched over the prosperity of his ancient people, and intended, at this time, to deliver them from their enemies, could easily dispose matters, so as to facili- tate or secure the capture of as many foxes, as the design of Samson required. In this singular stratagem, he is thought, by some writers, to have had two things in view ; at once, to deliver his country from those noxious animals, and to do the greatest possible mischief to his enemies. No kind of animals could be more suited to his purpose, espe- cially when coupled together in this manner ; for they run long and swiftly, not in a direct line, but with many wind- ings, so that, while they dragged in opposite directions, they .spread the fire over all the fields of the Philistines with the greater rapidity and success, and were at the same time prevented from getting into the woods, or holes in the rocks, where the firebrands had been extinguished, and the stratagem rendered ineffectual. — Paxton. Ver. 18. And he was sore athirst, and called on the Lord, Thou hast given this great deliver- ance into the hand of thy servant : and now shall I die for thirst, and fall into the hand of the uncircumcised ? 19. But God clave a hol- low place that was in the jaw, and there came water thereout ; and when he had drunk his spirit came again, and he revived : wherefore he called the name thereof Bn-hakkore, which is in Lehi unto this day. The impression ordinarily received from this passage by the English reader, viz. that a fountain was opened in the jaw-bone, the instrument of Samson's victory, is proba- bly erroneous. From a preceding verse in this chapter it appears that the Philistines had gone up, and pitched in Judah, and spread themselves in Lehi. But as it happens Jjchi is the original word for jaw, or jaw-bone, and our translators, following some of the ancient versions, have confounded the name of the place with that of the object from which it was derived. There is no good reason to suppose that the hollow place was cloven in the jaw itself, for what can be understood by God's cleaving a cavity which was already in the bone 1 For if he clave a cavity previously existing, would not the water naturally run through it and empty itself upon the ground 1 But let the word Lehi stand untranslated, and all is plain. ^ A certain cavity in the earth, in the place called Lehi, ^^'^s miracu- lously cloven and opened, and a refreshing fountain of wa- ter gushed forth, which continued thenceforth to flow down to the time when the history was written. This was call- ed, in memory of the circumstance which gave rise to it, " En-hakkore,"i. e. the well or fountain of him that cried. — B. All that this passage affirms is, that in the place where Samson then was, and which, from this transaction, he called Lehi, or the Jaw-bone, there was a hollow place which God clave, from whence a fountain flowed, which relieved Samson when ready to perish, and which continued to yield a considerable supply of water, at the time this sa- cred book was written, and possibly may flow to this day. Doubdan, in one single day, when he visited the countr}"- about Jerusalem, met with two such places. On Easter Monday, the first of April, 1652, he set out, he informs us, with about twenty in company, to visit the neighbourhood of Jerusalem. They went the same road the two disciples are supposed to have taken, when our Lord joined them, when he made their hearts burn within them. A convent was afterward built in the place where our Lord is ima- gined to have met them. Only some pieces of the walls of freestone are now remaining, with some walls and half- broken arches, and heaps of rubbish, together with a great cistern full of water, derived partly from rain, and partly from the springs in the mountain there, particularly from a most beautiful and transparent fountain, a little above it, which breaks out at the farther end of the grotto, naturally hollowed out in the hard rock, and which is overhung with small trees, where they made a considerable stop to refresh themselves. The water of this spring running by a channel into the cistern, and afterward turning a mill which was just by the cistern, and belonged to the monas- tery, and from thence flowed, as it still does, into the tor- rent-bed of that valley, from whence David collected the five smooth stones, of which one proved fatal to Goliath. Here we see a hollow place, a grotto, in which the God of nature had divided the rock for the passage of the water of a beautiful spring. It was a grotto in Lehi, in which God, on this occasion, made the water to gush out, and run in a stream into the adjoining coimtry, where the exhaust- ed warrior stood. — Burdjer. CHAPTER XVI. Ver. 6. And Delilah said to Samson, Tell me, I pray thee, wherein thy great strength lieth, and wherewith thou mightest be bound to afflict thee. 7. And Samson said unto her, If they bind me with seven green withes that were never dried, then shall I be weak, and be as another man. That is, any kind of pliant, tough wood, twisted in the form of a cord or rope. Such are used in many countries^ formed out of osiers, hazle, &c. In Ireland, very long and strong ropes are made of the fibres of bog- wood, or th^ larger roots o/ the fir, which is often dug up in the bogs or mosses of that country. In some places, they take the skia of the horse, cut it lengthwise from the hide, into thongs about two inches broad ; and after having laid them in salt for some time, take them out for use. This is frequently done in the country parts of Ireland; and is chiefly use for agricultural purposes, particularly for drawing th« plough and the harrow, instead of iron chains. — Buhder. Ver. 7. And Samson said unto her, If they bind me with seven green withes that were never dried, then shall I be weak, and be as another man. j People in England would be much surprised to see what powerful ropes are made from the withes of shrubs or trees. While they are in a green state, they are stronger than ^ any other ropes that are made in the country. Wild ele- phants, or bufl^aloes just caught, generally have their legs bound with green withes. — Roberts. alt i j 1 Ghap. 19. JUDGES, 145 Ver, 19, And she made him sleep upon her knees. It is very amusing to see a full-grown son, or a husband, asleep on his mother's or wife's knees. The plan is as follows: the female sits cross-legged on the carpet or mat, and the man having laid himself down, puts his head in her lap, and she gently taps, strokes, sings, and sooths him to sleep. — Roberts. Ver. 21. But the Philistines took him, and put out his eyes, and brought him down to Gaza, and bound him with fetters of brass ; and he did grind in the prison-house. With the Greeks and Asiatics, the way of putting out the eyes, or blinding, was not by pulling or cutting out the eyes, as sc^e have imagined ; but by drawing, or holding a red-hot iron before them. This method is still in use in Asia. According to Chardin, however, the pupils of the eyes' were pierced and destroyed on such occasions. But Thevenot says, that " the eyes in these barbarous acts are taken out whole, with the point of a dagger, and carried to the king in a basin." He adds, that, " as the king sends whom he pleases to do that cruel oifice, some princes are so butchered by unskilful hands, that it costs them their lives." In Persia it is no unusual practice for the king to punish a rebellious city or province by exacting so many pounds of eyes ; and his executioners accordingly go and scoop out from every one they meet, till they have the weight required. — Burder. The custom of daily grinding their corn for the family, shows the propriety of the law : " No man shall take the nether or the upper millstone to pledge, for he taketh a man's life to pledge ;" because if he take either the upper or the nether millstone, he deprives him of his daily pro- vision, which cannot be prepared without them, and, by cc nsequence, exposes him and all his house to utter destruc- tion. That complete and perpetual desolation which, by the just allotment of heaven, is ere long to overtake the mystical Babylon, is clearly signified by the same precept : " The sound of the millstone shall be heard no more at all in thee." The means of subsistence being entirely destroyed, no human creature shall ever occupy the ruined habitations more. In the book of Judges, the sacred historian alludes, with characteristic accuracy, to several circumstances im- plied in that custom, where he describes the fall of Abim- elech. A woman of Thebez, driven to desperation by his furious attack on the tower, started up from the mill at which she Avas grinding, seized the upper millstone, (nann'^s) and rushing to the top of the gate, cast it on his head, and fractured his skull. This was the feat of a woman, for the mill is worked only by females : it is not a piece of a millstone, but the rider, the distinguishing name of the upper millstone, which literally rides upon the other, and is a piece or division of the mill : it was a stone of " two feet broad," and therefore fully sufficient, when thrown from such a height, to produce the effect mentioned in the narrative. It displays also the vindictive contempt which suggested the punishment of Samson, the captive ruler of Israel. The Philistines, with barbarous contumely, com- pelled him to perform the meanest service of a female slave ; they sent him to grind in the prison, but not for himself alone ; this, although extremely mortifying to the hero, had been more tolerable ; they made him grinder for the prison, 1 while the vilest malefactor was permitted to look on and join in the cruel mockery of his tormentors. Samson, the ruler and avenger of Israel, labours, as Isaiah foretold the virgin daughter of Babylon should labour : " Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babvlon ; there is no throne, (no seat for thee,) O daughter of the Chal- deans . . . Take the millstones and grind meal," but not with the wonted song : " Sit thou silent, and get thee into darkness,"»there to conceal thy vexation and disgrace. — Paxton. Ver. 25. And it came to pass, when their hearts were merry, that they said, Call for Sanxson, that he may make us sport. I " By this time all the kaavy in that house was exhausted, the drinkers therefore removed to another, and Staus, the ' 19 prisoner, was told to follow ; his legs were then tied together, and he was told to jump, while they laughed and shouted, See, our meat is jumping. He asked if this was the place where he was to die. No, his master replied ; but these things were always done with foreign slaves. Having seen him dance, they now ordered him to sing; he sung a hymn; they bade him interpret it, and he said it was, in praise of God. They then reviled his God ; their blasphe- mies shocked him, and he admired in his heart the won- derful indulgence and long-suffering of God towards them." (Southdey's Brazil.) Don Gabriel de Cardenas gives an account nearly similiar of the treatment of prisoners by the Iroquois Indians. He describes the sufferings of ather Bresano, a Spanish priest, who had the misfortune to be captured by them. As soon as he arrived at the place of assembly, they inflicted many wounds, and treated him in the most cruel manner ; as soon as the warriors appeared, he was commanded to sing like the other prisoners ; he was also commanded to dance : in vain he excused himself on the plea of inability. Forced into the middle of the circle by these barbarians, he was by one ordered to sing, by another to dance ; if he persisted in keeping silence, he was cruelly beaten, and when he attempted to comply with their requests, his treatment was nearly the same. For upward of a month during their revels, he endured the most exquisite sufferings, which were to have been termi- nated by his being burnt to death, had not one of the chiefs mitigated his s'^ntence, and delivered him to an old woman in place of her grandson, who had been killed some yeais before. — Burder. Ver. 27. Now the house was full of men and women ; and all the lords of the Philistines were there : and there were upon the roof about three thousand men and women, that beheld while Samson made sport. The method of building in the East, may assist us in ac- counting for the particular structure of the temple or house of Dagon, and the great number of people that were buried in its ruins, by pulling down the two principal pillars upon which it rested. About three thousand persons crowded the roof, to behold while the captive champion of Israel made sport to his triumphant and unfeeling enemies. Sam- son, therefore, must have been in a court or area beneath'; and consequently, the temple will be of the same kmd with the ancient reitevri, or sacred enclosures, which were only surrounded, either in part or on all sides, with some plain or cloistered buildings. Several palaces and dou-wanas, as the halls of justice are called in these countries, are built in this fashion, in whose courts, wrestlers exhibit for the amusement of the people, on their public festivals and re- joicings ; while the roofs of these cloisters are crowded with spectators, that behold their feats of strength and agility. When Dr. Shaw was at Algiers, he frequently saw the inhabitants diverted in this manner, upon the root of the dey's palace ; which, like many more of the same quality and denomination, has an advanced cloister over against the gate of the palace, made in the form of a large pent-house, supported only by one or two contiguous pillars in the front, or else in the centre. In such open structures as these, the great officers of state distribute justice, and transact the public affairs of their provinces. Here, like- wise, they have their public entertainments, as the lords ol the PhiHstines had in the temple of their god. Supposing, therefore, that in the house of Dagon, was a cloistered building of this kind, the pulling down of the front or centre pillars which supported it, would alone be attended with the catastrophe which happened to the Philistines. — Pax- ton. CHAPTER XIX. Ver. 8. And he arose early in the morning on the fifth day to depart ; and the damsel's father said. Comfort thy heart, I pray thee. And they tarried until afternoon, and they did eat both ot them. "Until aflernoon." Hebrew, "till the day declined." In this way also do the people of the East speak, when the sun has passed the meridian; " I shall not go till the sur 146 JUDGES. Chap. 19. decline ;" " I must not go till the declining time." — Rob- erts. Ver. 27. And her lord rose up in the morning, and opened the doors of the house, and went out to go his way ; and, behold, the woman his concubine was fallen down at the door of the house, and her hands were upon the threshold. 28. And he said unto her. Up, and let us be going: but none answered. Then the man took her up upon an ass, and the man rose up, and gat him unto his place. 29. And when he was come into his house, he took a knife, and laid hold on his concubine, and divided her, together w'vOd her bones, into twelve pieces, and sent her into all the coasts of Israel. 30. And it was so, that all that saw it said. There was no such deed done nor seen, from the day that the children of Israel came up out of the land of Egypt unto this day : consider of it, take ad- vice, and speak your minds. The interpreters say little or nothing of the real views of the Levite, in thus cutting to pieces the body of his con- cubine, and sending a part to each tribe of Israel. They only say that the Levite was induced to this seeming out- rage, merely " to excite a general indignation against the authors of so black a crime ; that he committed no sin in thus maltreating a dead body, though it was his own con- cubine's ; as being so far from having any intention to offer it the least indignity, that he only considered the reparation of the ignominy with which his concubine had been treated : and that, after all, the success fully' justified his action and conduct." It is certain that the Levite's motives were good and regular: he intended to unite the whole nation in vengeance of a crime in which it was interested, and which covered it with infamy; but it was not, as some have thought, the horror of the spectacle Which the Levite held forth to the view of everybody, which produced this effect, and constrained their minds; that is, it was not the sight of these human limbs, thus cut and torn to pieces, which made the Jews conspire, and obliged them to take a striking ven- geance of so black a crime. The bare relation of an outrage so enormous, was suffi- cient to put the whole nation to the necessity of exacting punishment for an infamy of this nature : natural equity spoke for the Levite ; the most sacred rights were violated to the utmost ; never was adultery more glaringly commit- ted, or more insolently countenanced : it had involved a whole tribe ; a general and universal punishment, therefore, was indispensably necessary ; the text of scripture is ex- press in a hundred places ; and the Israelites could not be ignorant. But they might be checked by the extent of the punishment ; by the great number, the credit, the forces and powerof the offenders; by the natural commiseration which is felt for those who are of the same blood ; in a word, by an aversion to destroy a city, and to involve it utterly in the vengeance due to it. To oblige the nation to hear none of these reasons, the Levite sought and seized a method which might bind it, and by no means allow it to avoid his pursuits; which, in short, might put them to the indispen- sable necessity of espousing his and his concubine's* inter- ests, or to speak more properly, of taking up the cause of both. The only part, then, which he had to take, was to cut in pieces either the body of his wife, as he did, or else that of an ox, or other like ani&al, which had been either devoted, or offered in sacrifice, and to send a part of it to each tribe. In consequence of this, every tribe entered into a covenant and indissoluble engagement with them, to see justice done him, for the injury he had received. This is what the interpreters of scripture seem not to have known, and which it is necessary to explain. The ancients had several ways of uniting themselves together by the strictest ties, and these ties lasted for as long as the parties had stipu- lated. Among these, there were two principal ; both ad- mirably well described in the sacred books. The first is Jhat sacrifice of Abraham, the circumstances of which are mentioned, Gen. xv. 9, &c. The second is as follows : — A bullock was oflTered in sacrifice, or devoted: it was cut in pieces and distributed; all who had apiece of this sacrificed or devoted bullock, were from thenceforward connected, and were to concur in the carrying on the afiair which had given place to the sacrifice. But this sacrifice or devoting, and this division, was variously practised, which also pro- duced engagements somewhat different. If he who was at the expense of the sacrifice or devoting, were a public per- son, in a high office — a king, for instance, a prince, or judge — that is to say, a chief magistrate, or had the principal authority in a city, or state ; he sent, of his own accord, a piece of the victim or animal devoted, to all who were sub- ject to him ; and by this act they were obliged to enter intc his views, to obey'him, and to execute his orders without examination, or pretending difficulty or incapacity. If, on the contrary, the sacrifice were offered by a private person, those only who voluntarily took a piece of the sacrificed or devoted portions, entered into a strict engagement^o espouse the interest of him who sacrificed or devoted, and to em- ploy therein their fortunes and their persons. Connexions of this kind derived their force from the deities in honour of whom the sacrifice was offered, or the devotion made : from the true God, when the devotion was made by the Jews ; from idols, when the sacrifice was offered by the gentiles. The devotion was adopted by the Jews, and th'? sacrifice by the pagans. This diflference betwixt them, pro- duced a second : the Jews were content to invoke and take to witness the Lord ; whereas the pagans never failed to place in the midst of them, upon an altar of green turf, the deities who presided over their covenant ; and these kind of deities were called common, because in fact they were the common deities of all who are thus united, and receiv- ed in common the honours which they thought proper to pay them. These facts place the Levite's intents in their full light. His cutting in pieces the body of his concubine, was an anathema, a devoting which he made to the Lord ; and his sending a part of the pieces to each tribe, clearly signi- fied that he considered all the tribes as subject to the same anathema. God authorized these kinds of consecrations. The scripture is full of examples, which represent some- times persons, sometimes whole nations, whon* he had him- self smitten with a curse. He would have no sacrifices, however, of human victims ; but he approved of devotions to death : and yet, to consider both in certain points of view, they amounted nearly to the same thing. Again, devotion to death was a much stronger obligation than the promise of a sacrifice. A sacrifice vowed might be dispensed with, and redeemed ; whereas, so soon as the anathema was pro- nounced, the party was for ever bound, and there was no room for redemption. Lev. xxvii. 28, 29. It is certain that the Levite had a right to devote his wife to death, while she lived ; much more reasonably, then, might he devote her body when dead. It is so much the more probable that he really did so, as there was no other method of devotion and anathema that could induce the whole nation to be bound to declare itself in his favour. This anathema, as has been already remarked, extended not only to the body of his wife, but also to the twelve tribes, whom he involved in it, in case they took not effectual means to avenge both the indignity which the Benjamites of Gibeah would have offered him, and the horrible outrages which they had committed upon his concubine. What confirms this opin- ion, is, that m fact the twelve tribes assembled subscribed to this devotion. First, by taking up arms, as they did. Secondly, by swearing before the ark, not to return to their tents or "into their houses, till they had punished the offend- ers. Judges XX. 8, 9. Thirdly, by putting to the sword all that remained in the city of Gibeah, both man and beast, and burning all the cities and iovpas of Benjamin, Judges XX. 48. Fourthly, by swearing with an imprecation, not to give their daughters in marriage to the children of Ben- jamin, and by cursing him who should do so, ch. xxi. 1 — 18. Fifthly, and lastly, by engaging themselves by a terrible oath, to kill every Israelite who should not lake arms against the Benjamites, ib. ver. 5. These are all of them marks of anathema and devoting; and it would be to shut one's eyes to the light, not to discern in them the most express anathemas and devotions. Some,'^ perhaps, will object, that a private individual, as was this Levite, could not, of his own authority, subject to the anath- ema his whole nation. It is true, this Levite could devote Chap. 1—2. RUTH. 147 to death only his wives, his children, and his slaves, and submit to the anathema only his fields, vineyards, houses, household stuff, and, in short, his goods and what belonged to him. His authority extended no further. Only a judge of the Israelites, or their king, or perhaps the high-priest, could do this. So that the Levite had no intention to devote his whole nation, as he devoted the body of his concubine. He included his authority within its natural bounds ; he contented himself with declaring, by the sending the flesh and limbs of his concubine, that the whole nation was sub- ject to the anathema: this anathema was pronounced by God himself, and clearly declared in the law ; if just meas- ures were not taken to punish in a body the infamous crimes of the Benjamites, these crimes no way yielded to those of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, so sol- emnly anathematized. A like fate, therefore, was to await them. God had expressly forbidden adultery, and had placed it in the number of those crimes, of which the simple fact rendered the offenders accursed. They were not only to be put to death, (Lev. xx. 10 ; Deut. xxii. 22, &c.,) but also to perish from among God's people, Lev. 19 ; that is, they were to be cut off from the synagogue ; they could no longer pretend to the promises of the covenant, or the prerogatives of true and faithful Israelites ; in a word, they were to be excommunicated and anathematized. The nation, there- fore, could not leave unpunished the crimes of the inhabit- ants of Gibeah, without charging themselves with the crime, and whatever was attached to it. The Levite, bv announcing the crime, by declaring the obligation which there lay to punish, and by placing in full view the anathe- ma which they incurred who should refuse to league, to contribute to the effectual punishment, did nothing more than he might do ; nothing inconsistent with his condition, his rank, his quality, his dignity : he was even obliged to do so by his function of Levite : he explained the text of the law, 2 Esdras viii. 9. There was, properly speaking, no other method than that which he took, to specify the greatness of the crime of the inhabitants of Gibeah ; and he confined himself to that. The whole nation mstantly understood it as a universal anathema, without being in- formed of the nature of the crime which had incurred it. Thus, it is remarkable, that all the tribes expressly assem- bled at Mizpeh, to know of the Levite what was the mat- ter. He answered, " That the Benjamites of Gibeah had threatened to kill him, unless he consented to their in- famous passion ; that, moreover, they had injured his con- cubine with so mad and incredible a brutality, that, in short, she had died of it." Judg. xx. 3 — 5. tlpon this, every one was convinced of the reality of the anathema, and they not only all obliged themselves by oath not to re- turn to their houses, without chastising the inhabitants of Gibeah, in a manner suitable to the extent and blackness of their crime, ver. 10 ; but also to treat, in like manner, all those of the nation who should not march with the army of- the Lord against the Benjamites of Gibeah, ch. xxi. 5 ; which was, in fact, executed with regard to the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead, who were all put to the sword, without regard to sex or age, ver. 10. Thus is tlje anathe- ma sufficiently made out. — Critica Biblica. CHAPTER XXL Ver. 19. Then they said, Behold, there is a feast of the Lord in Shiloh yearly, in a place which is on the north side of Beth-el, on the east side of the highway that goeth up from Beth-el to Shechem, and on the south of Lebonah, " On the east side." The Hebrew has, " towards the sun- rising." Does a person ask the way to a place which lies towards the east, he will be told to go to the rising place, to the rising sky. If to the west, walk for the departed place, the gone down place. -rRoBERTa, RUTH. CHAPTER L Ver. 11. Are there any more sons in my womb? , Sc said Naomi to the widows of her sons who were fol- lowing her. When a mother has lost her son, should his widow only come occasionally to see her, the mother will be displeased, and affect^to be greatly surprised when she does come. " Do I again see you !" " Is it possible !" " Are there any more sons in my womb 1" But the mother-in-law also uses this form of expression when she does not wish to see the widow. — Roberts. Ver. 17. Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried : the Lord do so to me, and more also, if aught but death part thee and me. Tbe dreadful practice of widows burning themselves on the funeral pile with the dead bodies of their husbands, has made the declaration of the text familiar to the native mind. Hence a wife, when her husband is sick, should he be in danger, will say, " Ah ! if he die, I also will die ; I will go with him ; yes, my body, thou also shalt be a corpse." A slave, also, to a good master, makes use of the same language. Husbands sometimes boast of the affection of their wives, and compare them to the eastern stork, which if it lose its mate in the night is said immediately to shriek and die. — Roberts. CHAPTER II. Ver. 2. And Ruth the Moabitess said unto Naomi, Let me now go to the field, and glean ears of corn after him in whose sight I shall find grace. And she said unto her, Go, my daughter. The word glean comes from the French glaner, to gather ears or grains of corn. This was formerly a general cus- tom in England and Ireland : the poor went into the fields, and collected the straggling ears of corn after the reapers; and it was long supposed that this was their right, and that the law recognised it : but although it has been an old custom, it is now settled by a solemn judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, that a right to glean in the har- vest-field cannot be claimed by any person at common law. Any person may permit or prevent it in his own grounds. By certain acts of Henry VIII., gleaning and leasing are so restricted, as to be, in fact, prohibited in that part of the united kingdom. — Burder. Ver. 4. And, behold, Boaz came from Bethlehem, and said unto the reapers, The Lord be with you. And they answered him, The Lord bless thee. He went into the field to see how his workmen per- formed their service, and to encourage them by his w RUTH. Chap. 2. presence. Though he was both rich and great, he did not think it beneath him to go into his field, and personally inspect his servants. Thus Homer represents a king among his reapers, with his sceptre in his hand, and dis- covering great cheerfulness on the occasion. iaai\evs 6' sv rotcn viwTrr) JlKrjTtTpov ex"^^ eS'TIKSi ct' oyfiov yv^ocrvvos Krjp. Iliad, xviii. ver. 556, 557. Amid them, staff in hand, the master stood Enjoying mute the order of the field, WhQe, shaded by an oak, apart, his train. Prepared the banquet. ( Cowper.) — Burder. The reapers go to the field very early in the morning, and return home betimes in the afternoon. They carry provisions along with them, and leathern bottles, or dried bottle-gourds, filled with water. They are followed by their own children, or by others, who glean with much success; for a great quantity of corn is scattered in the reaping, and in their manner of carrying it. The greater part of these circumstances, are discernible in the manners of the ancient Israelites. Ruth had not proposed to Naomi, her mother-in-law, to go to the field, and glean after the reapers ; nor had the servant of Boaz, to whom she applied for leave, so readily granted her request, if gleaning had not been a common practice in that country. When Boaz inquired who she was, his overseer, after informing him, observes, that she came out to the field in the morning ; and that the reapers left the field early in the afternoon, as Dr. Russel states, is evident from this circumstance, that Ruth had time to beat out her gleanings before evening. They carried water and provisions with them ; for Boaz invited her to come and drink of the water which the voung men had drawn ; and at meal-time, to eat of the bread, and dip her morsel in the vinegar. And so great was the simplicity of manners in that part of the world, and in those times, that Boaz himself, although a prince of high rank in Judah, sat down to dinner, in the field, with his reapers, and helped Ruth with his own hand. Nor ought we to pass over in silence, the mutual salutation of Boaz and his reapers, when he came- to the field, as it strongly marks the state of religious feeling in IsraeUat the time, and furnishes another proof of the artless, the happy, and unsuspecting simplicity, which characterized the man- ners of that highly favoured people. " And, behold, Boaz came from Bethlehem, and said unto the reapers. The Lord be with you. And they answered him. The Lord bless thee." Such a mode of salutation continued among that people till the coming of Christ ; for the angel saluted Mary in language of similar import: "Hail, highly fa- voured, the Lord is with thee ; blessed art thou among Avomgn." It appears from the beautiful story of Ruth, that in Palestine, the women lent their assistance in cutting down and gathering in the harvest ; for Boaz commands her to keep fast by his maidens : — the women in Syria shared also in the labours of the harvest; for Dr. Russel informs us, they sang the Ziraleet, or song of thanks, when the passing stranger accepted their present of a handful of corn, and made a suitable return. — Paxton. Ver. 14. And Boaz said unto her, At meal-time come thou hither, and eat of the bread, and dip thy morsel in the vinegar. When Boaz is represented as having provided vinegar for his reapers, into which they might dip their bread, and kindly invited Ruth to share with them in the repast, we are not to understand it of simple vinegar, but vinegar mingled with a small portion of oil, if modern manage- ments in the Levant be allowed to be the most natural comment on those of antiquity. For even the Algerines indulge their miserable captives with a small portion of oil to the vinegar they allow them with their bread, according to the account Pitt gives of the treatment he and his com- panions received from them, of which he complains with some asperity. What the quality of the bread was, that the reapers of Boaz had, may be uncertain, but there is all imaginable reason to suppose the vinegar into which they dipped it, was made more grateful by the addition of oil. — Harmer. Ver. 14. And she sat beside the reapers: and he reached her parched corn, and she did eat, and was sufficed, and left. " To-day we crossed the valley of Elassar, and bathed in the hot-baths of Solomon, situated on the southern side, nearly at the bottom, near some corn-fields, where one of our Arabs plucked some green ears of corn, parched them for us, by putting them in the fire, and then, when roasted, rubbed out the grain in his hands." (Macmichel.) " After a ride of two hours from the valley of Zebulon," says Korte, "we came to a place where the disciples of the Lord are said to have plucked and eaten ears of corn on the sabbath day. The wheat in this country is not difler- ent from ours, only the grains are as hard as a stone from the heat, and therefore not so good to eat as with us. But in Egypt, in the Holy Land, and in all Syria, there grows a kind of beans, or peas, which are superior to our peas ; the stalk grows almost like the lentil: in the pod, which is very thick, and mostly hangs in bunches, there is general- ly only one grain. This kind is eaten green in the coun- try, and also in the towns, whither they are brought in bunches: when they are too old, they are roasted over coals, and so eaten, when they taste better. This is doubt- less the parched corn mentioned in the book of Ruth, and several other places." — Rosenmuller. They have other ways of preparing their corn for food, besides making it into bread. Burgle is very commonly used among the Christians of Aleppo ; which is wheat boil- ed, then bruised in a mill so as to separate it from the husk, after which it is dried, and laid up for use. The drying of burgle, though mentioned by some writers as a modern operation, seems to throw light on a remarkable passage in the history of David ; the concealment of his two spies in a well whose mouth was covered with corn. The custom of exposing corn in this way, must have been very common in Judea, else it had rather excited suspicion in the minds of the pursuers, than diverted their attention from the spot where the spies were concealed. That the well's mouth was covered on that occasion with burgle or boiled wheat, is exceedingly probable ; for Dr. Russel observes, that in preparing it after it has been softened in warm wa- ter, it is commonly laid out in the courtyard to dry. It could not be flour or meal; for they grindit only in small quantities, and as they want it, and never are known to ex- pose it in this way. Bishop Patrick supposes it was corn newly thrashed out, she pretended to dry; but if this was practised at all, of which we have no evidence, it was by no means common, and therefore calculated rather to be- tray, than to conceal the spies. Besides, the same word is used to signify corn beaten in a mortar with a pestle, not on the barn-floor with a thrashing instrument;" now burgle is actually pounded in this manner. It was therefore bur- gle or boiled wheat, which D'Arvieux expressly says is dried in the sun ; adding that they prepare a whole year's provision of it at once. Wheat and barley were prepared in the same way by the ancient Romans; which renders it very probable that the custom was universal among the civilized nations of antiquity. -This is the reason that nei- ther the exposure of the corn, nor the large quantity, pro- duced the least suspicion; every circumstance accorded with the public usage of the country, and by consequence, the preparation of this species of food is as ancient as the days of David. Sawick is a different preparation, and consists of corn parched in the ear ; it is made, as well of barley and rice, as of wheat. It is never called, in the in- spired volume, parched flour or meal, but always parched corn ; and consequently, seems to remain after the roasting, and to be eaten in the state of corn. In confirmation of this idea, we may quote a fact stated by Hasselquist, that in journeying from Acre to Sidon, he saw a shepherd eating his dinner, consisting of half-ripe ears of wheat roasted, which he ate, says the traveller, with as good an appetite as a Turk does his pillaw. The same kind of food, ho says, is much used in Egypt by the poor ; they roast the ears of Turkish wheat or millet ; but it is in his account far inferior to bread. Dr. Shaw is of a diflferent opinion ; he supposes the kali, or parched corn of the scriptures,' which he translates parched pulse, means parched cicers. But we frequently read in scripture of dried or parched; corn ; and the word used in those passages is most natural- ly to be understood of corn, and not of pulse. Besides, Rauwolf asserts that cicers are used in the East only as a Chap. 3, 4. RUTH. i^ part of the dessert after their meals. But it cannot be rea- sonably supposed, that Boaz would entertain his reapers with things of this kind; or that those fruits which in mod- ern times are used only in desserts, formed the principal part of a reaper's meal, in the field of so wealthy a propri- etor. This, however, the opinion of Dr. Shaw requires to be supposed ; for it is said in the inspired record, " He reached Ruth parched corn, and she did eat, and was suf- ficed, and left.'^ — Paxton. CHAPTER III. Ver. 2. And now is not Boaz of our kindred, with whose maidens thou wast ? Behold, he winnoweth barley to-night in the thrashing- floor. In these regions much of the agricultural labour is per- formed in the night. The sun is so hot, and so pernicious, that the farmers endeavour, as much as possible, to avoid its power. Hence numbers plough and irrigate their fields and gardens long after the sun has gone down, or be- fore it rises in the morning. The wind is also generally stronger in the night, which might induce Boaz to prefer that season. From the next two verses we learn that he took his supper there, and slept among the barley. Corn in the East is not kept in stacks, but after being reaped, is, in a few days, thrashed on the spot. The thrashing-floor is a circle of about forty feet in diameter, and consists generally of clay, and cowdung, without wall or fence. Under these circumstances, it is necessary for some of the people to sleep near the corn, till all shall have been thrashed and taken home. — Roberts. Ver. 7. And when Boaz had eaten and drunk, and' his heart was merry, he went to lie down at the end of a heap of corn : and she came softly, and uncovered his feet, and laid her down. Margin to the fourth verse, " lift up the clothes that are on his feet." All inferiors, all servants, sleep at the feet of their master. It is no uncommon thing for those who have a great favour to procure, to go to the house of the rich, and sleep with the head at his door, or in the verandah. Thus, when he arises in the morning, he finds the suppliant at his door. Should a master wish to dismiss his servants, they often say, " My lord, turn us not away ; how many years have we slept at your feetT' — Roberts, Ver. 9. And he said, Who art thou? And she answered, I am Ruth thy handmaid: spread therefore thy skirt over thy handmaid ; for thou art a near kinsman. The prophet Ezekiel, in describing the Jewish church as an exposed infant, mentions the care of God in bringing her up with great tenderness, and then, at the proper time, marrying her; which is expressed in the same way as the request of Ruth : " I spread my skirt over thee" " and thou becamest mine." Dr. A. Clarke says, "Even to the present day, when a Jew marries a woman, he throws the skirt or end of his talith over her, to signify that he has taken her under his protection." I have been delighted, at the marriage ceremonies of the Hindoos, to see among them the same interesting custom. The bride is seated on a throne, surrounded by matrons, having on her veil, her gayest robes, and most valuable jewels. After the thali has been tied round her neck, the bridegroom approaches her with a silken skirt, (purchased by himself,) and folds it round her several times over the rest of her clothes. A common way of saying he has married her, is, " he has given her the koori," has spread the skirt over her. There are, however, those who throw a long robe over the shoul- ders of the bride, instead of putting on the skirt. An angry husband sometimes says to his wife, " Give me back my skirt," meaning, he wishes to have the marriage compact dissolved. So the mother-in-laAV, should the daughter not treat her respectfully, says, " My son gave this woman the koori, skirt, and has made her respectable, but she neglects me." The request of Ruth, therefore, amounted to nothing 'n^ore than that Boaz should marry her. — Roberts. CHAPTER IV. Ver. 1. Then went Boaz up to the gate, and sat him down there : and, behold, the kinsman of whom Boaz spake came by ; unto whom he said. Ho, such a one ! turn aside, sit down here. And he turned aside, and sat down. The word gate is often used in 'scripture, to denote the place of public assemblies where justice is administered. — This definition of the word gate, in its first sense, agrees exactly with the usages of the Hindoos. People, therefore, who understand it literally, as meaning always a gate fixed in the walls of the city, do not comprehend its meaning. At the entrance of every town or village, there is a public building, called a rest-house, where travellers remain, and where people assemble to hear the news, or talk over the affairs of the place. There mav be seen many a Boaz asking for the advice of his relations and friends, and many an Abraham as he sat " at the gate of his city," bar- gaining " for the field," and " the cave of Machpelah," in which to bury his beloved Sarah.— Roberts. Ver. 2. And he took ten men of the elders of the city, and said. Sit ye down here. And they sat down. Among the Hebrews, and, before them, among the Ca- naanites, the purchase of any thing of consequence was concluded, and the price paia, publicly, at the gate of the city, as the place of judgment, before all that went out and in. Gen. xxiii. Ruth iv. — As those who wanted amuse- ment, and to pass away the time, were wont to sit in the gates, purchases there made could always be testified by numerous witnesses. Their care to have them so attested, might, perhaps, be a relic of the custom of the times pre- ceding the invention of the art of writing; (which, by the way, took place probably not very long before the days of Abraham ;) and it did not even after that period cease to be useful, because among the Hebrews writing not being very common, the memory of witnesses had often to supply the place of a document of purchase. At the same time, it would seem that such documents were not altogether unu- sual. For the xxiii. chapter of Genesis is in its style 'so different from that of Moses on other occasions, and has so much of the appearance of the record of a solemn jurid- ical procedure, that it almost seems to be a deed of pur- chase. From Ruth iv. 7, we learn another singular usage on occasions of purchase, cession, and exchange, viz. that the transference of alienable property had, in earlier times, been confirmed by the proprietor plucking off his shoe, and handing it over to the new owner. We see at the same time, that in the age of David this usage had become anti- quated; for the writer introduces it as an unknown custom of former times, in the days of David's great-grandfather. I have not been able to find any further trace of it in the East; nor yet has the Danish travelling mission to Arabia, as Captain Niebuhr himself informs me. Bynseus, in his book, De Calceis Hebrceornm^ treats of it at great length; but, excepting the mere conjectures of modern literati, he gives no account of the origin of this strange symbol of the transfer of property. In the time of Moses it was so famil- iar, that barefooted was a term of reproach, and probably signified a man that had sold every thing, a spendthrift, and a bankrupt ; and we see from Deut. xxv. 9, 10, that Moses allowed it to be applied to the person who would not marry his brother's widow. Could it have been an Egyptian custom, as we do not find it again in the East 1 The Egyp- tians, when they adored the Deity, had no shoes on ; and of this the Pythagoreans gave the following explanation : " The philosopher, who came naked from his mother's womb, should appear naked before his Creator ; for God hears those alone who are not burdened with any thing extrinsic. " — Among the Egyptians too, barefooted was equivalent to naked, and naked synonymous with having no property, but one's self. This same custom of pulling off the shoe, and that at the gate before all who went out and in, was also usual in important cases of the exchange or resignation of propertv; as for instance, (to take the exam- ple just quoted from Ruth iv. 7, 9,) when the nearest kins- man abandoned his right of redemption to a distant rela- tion ; and we may, perhaps, thence conclude, that a simi- 150 RUTH. Chap. 4. lar form took place in cases of great donations, when not made on a sick-bed, but by persons in health. — Michaelis. Ver. 7. Now this was the manntr in former time in Israel, concerning redeeming, and concern- ing changing, for to confirm all things ; a man plucked off his shoe, and gave it to his neigh- bour; and ih\s* was a testimony in Israel. 8. Therefore the kinsman said unto Boaz, Buy it for thee. So he drew off his shoe. See on Matt. 22. 24. The simple object, therefore, in taking off the shoe, was to confirm the bargain: it was the testimony or memorial of the compact. In Deuteronomy it is mentioned that the brother of a deceased husband shall marry the widow, but should he refuse, then the widow is to " go up to the gate unto the elderfj and say, My husband's brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel ; he will not perform the duty of my husband's brother." Then the elders were to call the man, and if he persisted in his re- fusal, the woman was to come forward " and loose his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face ; was to answer and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house. " From that time the man was dis- graced, and whenever his person or establishment was .spoken of, it was contemptuously called " the house of him that hath his shoe loosed. " To be spit at in the face is the most degrading ceremony a man can submit to. This was done by the widow to her husband's brother, and she CONFIRMED his iguomiuy by taking off his shoe. But this taking off the shoe (as we shall hereafter see) may also allude to the death of her husband, whose shoes were taken off and of no further use to him. And as she said, when she had taken off the shoe from her husband's brother's foot "thus shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house," may mean, he also shall soon follow his brother, and have his shoes taken off his Icei '1 death. When Ramar had to go to reside in the desefu for fourteen years, his brother Parathan was very unwilling for him to go; and tried, in every possible way, to dissuade him from his purpose. But Ramar persisted in his resolution, having fuUy made up his mind to take his departure. When the brother, seeing that his entreaties were in vain, said, " Since you are determined to go, promise me iaithfully to return." Then Ramar, having made the {)romise, gave his shoes to Parathan as a confirmation of lis vow. Does a priest, a father, or a respectable friend, resolve to go on a pilgrimage to some distant country ; some one will perhaps say, "Ah ! he will never return, he intends to remain in those holy places. " Should he deny it, then they say, " Give us your shoes as a witness of your promise," and having done so, never will he break it. An affectionate widow never parts with her late husband's shoes: they are placed near her when she sleeps, she kisses and puts her head upon them, and nearly every time after bathing, she goes to took at them. These, therefore, are the " testimony," the melancholy confirmation of her husband's death. — Roberts. Ver. 10 Moreover, Ruth the Moabitess, the wife of Mahlon, have I purchased to be my wife, to raise up the name of the dead upon his in- heritance, that the name of the dead be not cut off from among his brethren, and from the gate of his place : ye are witnesses this day. I now proceed to the explanation of a singular law, which I must however preface, with entreating, in behalf of the lawgiver, that it may not be considered as an inven- tion of his own; as it was in fact several centuries older than his laws, and as he very much limited and mitigated its operation. The law I mean, is what has been termed the Levirate law : in obedience to which, when a man died without issue, his brother was obliged to marry the widow he left, and that with this express view, that the first son produced from the marriage should be ascribed, not to the natu al father, but to his deceased brother, and become his heir. This has been denominated Levi rate-marriage, from the word Ijevir, which though it appears not in the ancient classic authors, but only in the Vulgate and the Pandects, is nevertheless really an old Latin word, and is explained by Festus to signify a husband's brother. The Hebrews had in like manner an ancient law term, which we meet not with elsewhere, {py^ Jaba/ii,) of the very same import ; Avhence come nn2-> {Jebemet,) a brother's u-ife, and nni {Jeb- bem,) to marry such a person. The ChalJlee, Syriac, and Samaritan versions of the Bible do indeed retain this word, but it is not otherwise at all current in these languages, nor can we find in them the least trace of an etymology for it, and in the Arabic tongue it is altogether unknown. This is often the case with respect to the Hebrew law terms. The Hebrew language alone has them, and with- out all etj-mology, while in the kindred languages, they are ei.her not to be found at all, or m quite a diflerent sense. How that happens I am ignorant, with this exception, that I frequently remark, in like manner, among ourselves, an- cient law terms, whose etymology is obscure, because old words have been retained in law, while the language has in other respects undergone alterations. The law which obliged a man to marry the widow of his childless brother, was much more ancient than the time of Moses ; having been in use in Palestine among the Canaanites, and the ancestors of the Israelites, at least more than 250 years previous to the date of his law, and indeed with such rig- our, as left a person no possible means of evading it, how- ever irksome and odious compliance with it might appear to him. The law, however, was unquestionably attended with great inconveniences : for a man cannot but think it the most unpleasant of all necessities, if he must marry a woman whom he has not chosen himself Must, in mat- ters of love and marriage, is a fearful word, and almost quite enough to put love to flight, even where beauty ex- cites it. We see, likewise, that the brother, in some in- stances, had no inclination for any such marriage, (Gen. xxxviii. Ruth iv.) and stumbled at this, that the first son produced from it could not belong to him. Whether a second son might follow, and continue in life, was very uncertain ; and among a people who so highly prized gene- alogical immortality of name, it was a great hardship for a man to be obliged to procure it for a person already dead, and to run the risk, meanwhile, of losing it himself. Nor was this law very much in favour of the morals of the other sex ; for not to speak of Tamar, who, in reference to it, conceived herself justified in having recourse to a most infamous action, I will here only observe, that what Ruth did, (chap. iii. 6—9,) in order to obtain, for a husband, the person whom she accounted as the nearest kinsman of her deceased husband, is, to say the least, by no means conform- able to that modesty and delicacy which we look for in the other sex. A wise and good legislator could scarcely have been inclined to patronise any such law. But then it is not advisable directly to attack an inveterate point of honour ; because in such a case, for the most part, noihing is gain- ed ; and in the present instance, as the point of honour placed immortality of name entirely in a man's leaving de- scendants behind him, it was so favourable to the increase of population, that it merited some degree of forbearance and tenderness. Moses, therefore, left the Israelites still in possession of their established right, but at the same time he studied as much as possible to guard against its rigour and evil effects, by limiting and moderating its operation in various respects. In the y?r5< place, he expressly prohibited the marriage of a brother's widow, if there were children of his own alive. Before this time, brothers were probably in the practice of considering a brother's widow as. part of the inheritance, and of appropriating her to themselves, if unable to buy a wife, as the Mongols do; so that this was a very necessary prohibition. For a successor precsumptivus in thoro, whom a wife can regard as her future husband, is rather a dan- gerous neighbour for her present one's honour; and if she happen to conceive any predilection for the younger bro- ther, her husband, particularly in a southern climate, will hardly be secure from the risk of poison. In the second place, he allowed, and indeed enjoined, the brother to marry the widow of his childless brother but if he was not disposed to do so, he did not absolutely compel him, but left him an easy means of riddance ; for he had only to declare in court, that he had no inclination to marry her, and then he was at liberty. This, it is true, Chap. 4. RUTH. 151 jjubjected hnn to a punishment which at first appears suf- ftcienily severe: Uie flighted widow had a right to revile* him in courc as much as she pleased ; and from his pulling off his shoe, and delivering it to the widow, he received the appellation of Ba-esok, which any body might apply to himwii-hout beiUj^ Jiaole to a prosecution. A little consid- eration, however, will show that this punishment was not so severe in reality as in appearance. For if Baresole is once undersiood, accbrding to the usage of the language, to mean nothing more than a man who has given a woTimn Ike rejusal, it is no longer fell as a term of great reproach, and any one will rather endure it, than have his own re- fusal talked of To be once in his lifetime solemnly abused in a public court by a woman, is at any rate much easier to be borne, than the same treatment from a man, or extra- judicially ; and if, besides, the cause is known, and that the court allows her this liberty, in order to give free vent to her passion, because the man will not marry her according 10 her wish; the more violent the emotions of her rage are, the more flattering to him must they prove ; and he will go out of court with more pride than if she had excused him from marrying her, with much coolness, or without any emotion at all. — I have often heard vain fops mention in company, how many women in o^Aer places would glad- ly have married them, and were greatly enraged that thev would not take them. On persons of this description, such a judicial punishment would indeed have been very justly bestowed. But it is at worst more flattering than even the very politest language with which a lady begs leave to de- cline an offer of marriage, or but distantly yields to it. A legislator, in ordaining a punishment of this nature, could hardly have had it in view to insist very particularly on the observance of a statute, that but ratified an old custom by way of a compliment. If it had been a point in which he was interestei, he would have ordained a very different punishment. 3. The person whose duty it was to marry a childless widow, was the brother of her deceased husband, in the strict sense of the word, as the story in Gen. xxxviii. clear- ly shows. I would not have thought it necessary to make 'his remark, had not the contrary opinion been maintained m a Dissertation delivered here at Gottingen, in which it is asserted, that the word brother^ in Deut. xxv. 5 — 10, is to be taken in a general sense, and means a relation^ exclu- ding the real brother. The law, however, only extended to a brother living in the same city or country, not to one re- siding at a greater distance. Nor did it affect a brother having already a wife of his own. At least, if it had its origin in this, that by reason of the dearness of young wo- • The Hebrew expression in Deut. xxv. 9, >>3B3 npT>i has been by some so understood, as if the widow had a right to spit in his face. And no doubt it may signify as much ; but then that act in a pubhc court is so indecent, that if any other interpretation is admissible, this one ouglit not to be adopted. Now there are two others : 1. She shall spit before his face. The Arabs, at this day, when they wish to affront any one, spit, and cry J^' ; even people of rank do so, just as the common peo- Sle do with us. This account we find even in lexicons ; but I know it esides, from the information furnished both by Solomon Negri, a na- tive Arab, and by travellers. 2. p-\> may also mean to revile ; proper- ly Bilem evomere, which signification is famihar in Arabia ; only that, according to the usual rule, the Hebrew Jod must be changed into Van, and the word written Varak. men, often only one brother could marry, and the others also wished to do the same, it could only affect such as were unmarried ; and in the two instances that occur in Gen. xxxviii. and Ruth iv. we find the brother-in-law, whose duty it was to marry, apprehensive of its proving hurtful to himself and his inheritance, which could hardly have been the case, if he had previously had another wife, or (but that was at least expensive) could have taken one of his own choice. When there was no brother alive, or when he declined the duty, the Levirate-Jaw, as we see from the book of Ruth, extended to the next nearest rela- tion of the deceased husband, as for instance, to his pater- nal uncle, or nephew ; so that at last, even pretty remote kinsmen, in default of nearer ones, might be obliged to un- dertake it. Boaz does not appear to have been very nearly related to Ruth, as he did not so much as know who site was, when he fell in love with her, while she gleaned in his fields. Nor did she know that he was any relation to her, until apprized of it by her mother-in-law. Among the Jews of these days, Levirate-marriages have entirely ceased ; so much so, that in the marriage contracts of the very poorest people among them, it is generally stipulated, that the bridegroom's brothers abandon all those rights to the bride, to which they could lay claim by Deut, xxv, — Mi- ch aelis, Ver. 11. And all the people ihsit were in the gate, and the elders, said, We are witnesses. The Lord make the woman that is come into thy house like Rachel and like Leah, which two did build the house of Israel; and do thou worthily in Ephratah, and be famous in Beth- lehem. The marriage ceremony was commonly performed in a garden, or in the open air ; the bride was placed under a canopy, supported by four youths, and adorned with jewels according to the rank of the married persons ; all the com- pany crying out with joyful acclamations, Blessed be he that Cometh. It was anciently the custom, at the conclu- sion of the ceremony, for the father and mother, and kin- dred of the woman, to pray for a blessing upon the parties. Bethuel and Laban, and the other members of their family, pronounced a solemn benediction upon Rebecca before her departure : " And they blessed Rebecca, and said unto her, thou art our sister, be thou the mother of thousands of mil- lions ; and let thy seed possess the gate of those that hate them." And in times long posterior to the age of Isaac, when Ruth the Moabitess was espoused to Boaz, " All the people that were in the gate, and the elders, said, we are witnesses. The Lord make the woman that is come into thine house like Rachel and like Leah, which two did build the house of Israel ; and do thou worthily in Ephratah, and be famous in Bethlehem." After the benedictions, the bride is conducted, with great pomp, to the house of her husband ; this is usually done in the evening ; and as the procession moved along, money, sweetmeats, flowers, and other articles, were thrown among the populace, which they caught in cloths made for such occasions, stretched in a particular manner upon frames. — Paxton. THE FIRST BOOK OF SAMUEL. CHAPTER I. Ver. 1. Now there was a certain man of Rama- thaim-zophim, of mount Ephraim, and his name was Elkanah, the son of Jeroham, the son of Elihu, the son of Tohn, the son of Zuph, an Ephrathite: 2. And he had two wives; the name of the one was Hannah, and the name of the other Peninnah. How much soever some may have denied it, nothing is more certain, than that by the civil laws of Moses a man was allowed to have more wives than one. No doubt, all the proofs of this fact, which it is usual to adduce, are not valid ; and to the maintainers of the opposite opin- ion, it may be an easy matter to controvert such as are weak or inaccurate ; but the following arguments appear to me to place the matter beyond all doubt. 1. It is certain that before the time of Moses, polygamy was in use among the ancestors of the Israelites, and that even Abraham and Jacob lived in it. It is also certain, that it continued in use after the time of Moses. I will not interrupt the text with a multitude of examples ; but there are two of such weight as to merit particular notice. — One of them we find in 1 Chron. vii. 4, where not only the five fathers, named in the preceding verse, but also their de- scendants, forming a tribe of 36,000 men, had lived in polyg- amy, which also shows, by the way, that it must have been more common in some families than in others. — The other occurs in 2 Chron. xxv. 3, where we see the high-priest himself, who was of course the authentic expounder of the Mosaic statutes, taking for Joash, who clave to him as a son, two wives, which shows that he had not at any rate looked upon bigamy as prohibited by the law of Deut. xvii. 17. As then, Moses, adhering to established, usage, no- where prohibited a man's taking a second or a third wife, along with the first, it is clear that, as a civil right, it con- tinued allowable ; for what has hitherto been customary, and permitted, remains so, in a civil sense, as long as no Eositive law is enacted against it. Therefore, the objection ere made, that Moses nowhere authorizes polygamy, by an express statute, amounts to nothing ; more especially when it is considered, that, as we shall immediately see under Nos. 2, 3, 4, it is implied in three several texts, that he ac- tually did authorize it. But although he had not done so, his silent acquiescence in, and non-prohibition of, the prac- tice previously held lawful, is quite enough to sanction our opinion of his having left it still allowable as a civil right. And, 2. This proof becomes still stronger, when we remark how very common polygamy must have been at the very time when Moses lived and gave his laws. For, when Moses caused the Israelites to be numbered, he found 603,550 males above 20 years of age. Now, according to political calculations, the proportion of those under 20, to those above it, is in general reckoned as 12 to 20, or, at any rate, as 12 to 15 ; but admitting, in the present case, that it was but as 10 to 20, to the above number of adult males, we should thus have still to add a half more, or 301,775, for those under 20, besides 22,000 Levites that were reck- oned separately ; so that the whole number of males must have amounted to at least 927,325. Now among all this people, we find from Numb. iii. 43, that there were no more than 22,273 first-born males, of a month old and upward ; that is, only one first-born among 42 : so that, had the Is- raelites lived in monogamy, it would follow that every marriage had on an average given birth to 42 children, which, however, is hardly possible to be conceived ; whereas if every Israelite had four or more wives, it was very pos- sible that of every father on an average that number might have sprung, and, of course, of 42 Israelites, there would be but one first-born. At the same time, this being the case, polygamy must certainly have gone great lengths, and been very universally practised among them ; and if it was so, and Moses forbade it by no law, it is obvious that it con- tinued allowable as a civil right. If in this deduction there appear any thing dubious or obscure, I must refer the reader to my Dissertation, De Censibus HebrcBorum, in paragraphs 4, 5, and 6 of which, I have considered this argument at greater length. 3. The law of Deut. xxi. 15 — 17, already explained, presupposes the case of a man having two wives, one of whom he peculiarly loves, while the other, whom he hates, is the mother of his first-born. Now this is the very case which occurs in Genesis, in the history of Jacob, and his wives Leah and Rachel ; and this law ordains, that in such a case the husband was not to bestow the right of primo- geniture upon the son of the favourite wife, but to acknow- ledge as his first-born the son that actually was so. 4. The law of Exod. xxi. 9, 10, in like manner already explained, expressly permits the father, who had given his son a slave for a wife, to give him, some years after, a second wife, of freer birth ; and prescribes how the first was then to be treated. The son was bound to pay her matrimonial duty as often as she could have claimed it before his second marriage ; and, therefore, if he did so, the marriage still subsisted. If he refused, the marriage immediately ceased, and the woman received her liberty. When Moses, in Lev. xviii. 18, prohibits a man from mar- rying the sister of his wife, to vex her while she lives, it manifestly supposes the liberty of taking another wife besides the first, and during her lifetime, provided only it was not her sister. But because the sense of this passage has been much disputed, and others, in opposition to the plain words of Moses, consider it as a general prohibition of polygamy ; as I cannot with propriety expatiate fully on their explanation here, I must refer the reader to my Dis- sertation already quoted. On the Mosaic Statutes prohibitory of Marriages betwixt Near Relations. It does not appear, however, that Moses permitted po- lygamy willingly, or as a matter of indifference in either a moral or a political view, but, as Christ expresses it, merely on account of the hardness of the people's hearts. In other words, he did not approve it, but found it advisable to toler- ate it, as a point of civil expediency. His first book, which is entirely historical, includes many particulars that are by no means calculated to recommend polygamy. According to him, God, even at the very time when the rapid popula- tion of the earth was his great object, gave to the first man but one wife, although it is evident that with /oiir wives, he could have procreated more children than with one ; and when, in consequence of the flood, the earth was to be re- duced anew to its original state in this respect, and God resolved to preserve alive only Noah and his three sons, we still find that each of them had but one wife with him. Now had God approved of polygamy, he would have com- manded each of JVoah's sons to marry as many wives as possible, and take them with him into the ark. From these two historical facts, the natural proportion between the sexes, which, where population is numerous, cannot be discovered without much trouble, becomes at once obvious ; and this very proportion, considering that we actually find much about the same number of men as of women fit for the mar- ried state, is the strongest possible argument against polyg- amy ; the lawfulness or unlawfulness of which, as Mon- tesquieu very justly observes, resolves itself, properly speaking, into a question of arithmetic. Moses did not permit eunuchs to be made among the Israelites. Indeed he went so far as to prohibit even the castration of cattle, Lev. xxii. 24; and besides this, a eunuch that came from another country to reside among the Israelites, was by a special Chap 1. 1 SAMUEL. 153 statute excluded from ever .becoming one of the people of God, that is, was incapable of enjoying the privileges and rights of an Israelite, both sacred and civil, Deut. xxiii, 2. This was an ordinance highly unfavourable to polygamy. We commonly find polygamy and eunuchism going to- gether; and in those countries in which the former pre-- vails, such as Turkey, Persia, and China, there are thou- sands, and even millions of eunuchs. Where so many of the males that are born, can never become husbands and obtain wives, it is nothing less than merciful to place them beyond the temptation of longing for a wife ; and, in early infancy, before ihey know what has befallen them, to assign them that intermediate state, in which, without properly belonging to either sex, they are to live, and earn their bread. Besides, where polygamy is carried to great lengths, there is in the nature of the case an imperious necessity for rigilant watchers of their chastity. In a word, without (uni^chs, a great seraglio cannot be guarded; and of course, a law prohibiting castration imperceptibly counter- acts polygamy. This is also an observation of M. de Fre- mont val. It would appear, that in the course of time, polygamy had very much decreased among the Israelites, and become rather uncommon. Solomon, in Prov. xxxi. 10 — 31, in his description of that wife whom he accounted a blessing to her husband, represents her entirely as a mater-familias, that is, the mistress and ruler of the whole household ; which a wife in the state of polvgamy can never be, being destined solely for her husband s bed, and having no per- mission to concern herself at all about domestic economy. It would therefore seem, that although Solomon himself lived in boundless polygamy, his subjects were contented with one wife. Besides, had polygamy continued as com- mon as in the days of Moses, the price of wives would have advanced in proportion to the increased value of other commodities ; but we find that in the time of the prophet Hosea, a wife was still the same as the medium rate in the time of Moses ; for that was about 30 shekels ; and Hosea (iii. 2) bought Ms for 15 shekels, -and 15 ephahs of barley. Every thing else had risen in price, (as I have shown m my Dissertation, De pretiis rerum apud Hebmos, in the 3d Part of the Commentaria of the Gottingen Society of Sci- ences,) except wives ; and consequently, polygamy, which makes them scarce and dear, must have been much dimin- ished, or have ceased almost altogether among the Israel- ites. That it ceased entirely after the return of the Jews from the Babylonish captivity, is, indeed, certain ; but with that fact we have here nothing to do, as it was neither an article nor an effect of the Mosaic law, but proceeded from Qther accidental causes. But how came it to pass that Moses, who certainly did jnot approve of polgyamy, and counteracted its increase by Various impediments, did not rather at once prohibit it al- together 1 This is indeed an important question, and has not hitherto received a satisfactory answer. Many of IVJontesquieu's readers will perhaps think, that nothing can be easier than lo answer it fully in the following .terms : " The lawfulness or unlawfulness of polygamy depends ^entirely on the proportion of females born to that of males, or is, as Montesquieu very properly terms it, a problem of arithmetic. Now in Asia there are many more females than males, and consequently, polygamy should be there permitted for the very same reason for which it is prohib- ited in Europe. Where the numbers of both sexes are equal, there both nature and arithmetic prescribe monoga- ifliy ; but where the procedure of nature is different, and ■^everal girls are born for one boy, there she allows, or, I .should rather say, there she authorizes polygamy." Here, however, and in what he says of Asia, Montesquieu is un- doubtedly mistaken. For without very clear proofs, and without having accurate enumerations, and birth-lists, of all the Asiatic nations, who will believe either him or any other traveller, asserting that, in regard to the proportion of the sexes born, the procedure of nature in Asia, partic- ularly in Turkey, Persia, China, and Japan, is altogether different from what we find it in Europe % It cannot be supposed that the circumstance of these countries lying j more to tfie east than our European regions, can have any i effect in this respect ; for the difference of climate depends I not on the easterly or westerly, but on the southerly or ' northerly position of a country ; in other words, not on the degree of longitude, but of latitude. Now, Minorca lies 20 under the 39th degree of latitude, and of course, some de- grees more to the south than Constantinople, and the coun- tries between the Black and Caspian Seas, whence the Turks and Persians purchase young women for their se- raglios, but in the very same latitude with a great part of Turkey, Persia, China, and Japan ; and yet this Island, according to Armstrong's account, in letter 15th, of his his- tory of it, had, in the year 1742, exclusive of the English garrison, 15,000 male inhabitants, and but only 12,000 fe- male. Now, how can we believe, after this, that under the very same climate, but farther eastward, nature should, on the contrary, produce more persons of the other sex than of ours, merely because there it is noon, when the sun but begins to rise on Minorca"? The English colonies in America have, part of them at least, a still more southerly position ; but even there, no other proportion of births, in the two sexes, has been remarkea, than what is found in England itself. The whole mistake, into which even the venerable Montesquieu himself has been betrayed, proceeds from this, that in some of the great capitals of Asia, there are a great many more women than men, owing to the residence of monarchs and people of fortune, who keep great seraglios, for which girls are purchased in other places, and brought to the metropolis. It does not, however, thence follow, that in Asia there are more females borft than males, but only that the former being more numerous in the rich cities, are in the provinces, whence they are bought, less so, in the very same proportion. Mr. Porter, the British ambassador at Constantinople, makes this re- mark in the Philosophical Transactions, vol. xlix. art. 21st ; so that it is not matter of speculation, but of experi- ence. But the conclusion drawn from the oriental cap- itals, to the state of whole countries, in regard to the pro- portion of the sexes, is much in the same style a^'ould be that of the traveller, who on seeing a German army of 100,000 troops, and remarking that there was scarcely one woman with it to ten men, should go home and assert that he had discovered, that in Germany there were ten times as many males born as females. I am therefore of opinion, that with regard to the polygamy allowed among the Is- raelites, we can say nothing else than what Christ has said on the subject of divorce. Moses tolerated it on account of their hardness of heart, and because it would have been found a difficult matter to deprive them of a custom al- ready so firmly established. The Egyptian monarchs en- deavoured to prevent the multiplication of the Israelites, and for this purpose, went so far as to order all their male children, as soon as born, to be thrown into the Nile; and yet Moses found polygamy among them, which, of course, could not have been prohibited by the Egyptian govern- ment. A people, whose children a tyrant drowned to hin- der their mcrease, while yet he dared not to check their polygamy, must have clung very closely to that privilege, and not have been likely to surrender it without rebelling. Whether the climate may have, in any degree, contribu- ted to produce this hardness of heart, I will neither confi- dently affirm nor deny, so long as we are destitute of what I would call a geographical history of polygamy and mo- nogamy, which a person might survey at a short glance ; for thus much is certain, that in the most northerly regions of Siberia and Tartary, there are nations that live in po- lygamy ; and in the very warmest climates, on the contra- ry, we find Christians, and even nations, satisfied with mo- nogamy. If the former is more prevalent towards the south, we must bear in mind, that in regard to laws, though much depends on climate, yet every thing does not, but still more on accidental circumstances ; and that ancient usage, or religion, may have a very powerful influence on the na- ture of the law. But should even the climate actually cause a difference in the point in question, and make it more difficult to put a stop to polygamy, by law, among southern than northern nations, because they are naturally more addicted to it ; still the cause thereof would not be referable to any inequality in the proportion of the sexes, but to the earlier puberty of southern nations, and the ear- lier violence of libidinous propensities therewith connect- ed. The natural consequence of these early and strong feelings of love, are early marriages ; the wife, in such a case, can hardly be more than two years younger, and the appropriated concubine is perhaps even older than the boy that becomes her husband: and when he has reached his 25*h or 30th, and still more, his 37th year, which Aristotle 154 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 1. fixed as the fittest time for a man to marry, his wife, or concubine, particularly if she has borne many children, has by that time become too old for him, and then he either meditates a divorce, or taking a younger wife in addition to the former. This last is indeed the least of the two evils for the unfortunate first wife ; and the legislator who wishes that she, particularly if a slave, that can have no will of her own, may experience the least possible hard- ship or injustice, will in this view tolerate polygamy. In- deed if he were to prohibit it, it is probable the people w^ould not submit to the privation without some disturb- ance. — If what I have now said, merely by way of conjec- ture, be correct, the consideration of climate might have had some influence with Moses in his toleration of polyga- my, as a civil right; for Palestine is certainly to be num- bered among southern climates, although indeed the Israel- ites, at the time when Moses may be said to have taken them under his protection, had. been accustomed to a country somewhat farther south, and much warmer. There is yet another circumstance to be taken into the account, which made polygamy in Palestine more tolerable in a political light, than among us, where it would soon depopulate ?. country, because we have not, as was then the case, any opportunity of purchasing, or of carrying off as captiv^es, the young women of other natijns. The laws of war, in those days, gave the victors a right to make slaves of young women, and these they might employ for the purposes of polygamy, without thereby depriving any Is- raelite of a wife borri to him among his own people. No doubt this was a very severe war law, and detrimental to the general interests of mankind : but it w^as once estab- lished, and although the Israelites had not acted up to it, their neighbours would not therefore have lost any oppor- tunity of doing so, which the fortune of war put into their power. It must also be considered thai the Israelites lived in the vicinity of a poor people, whose daughters they could purchase: for nature has been so unkind to Arabia, that most of its inhabitants must always be in a state of indi- gence, with the exception of any particular family or city that may happen to be enriched by trade, or by singular good-fortune in rearing sheep. Mr. Wood in his Essay on the original genius of Homer, has given a very faithful description of the natural poverty of Arabia, which, after all the improvements it can receive from fortune and art, uniformly sinks back to its original state; and Mr. Nie- buhr has orally given me an account of the poverty of the Arabs, which far exceeded even what I should have expected. Although the Mosaic laws do not prohibit more than one wife, still they did not thereby authorize polygamy in the whole extent of the word, and that a man might have as many wives as he pleased. This is not perhaps altogether the consequence of those statutes, which enjoined the hus- band to perform the conjugal rites with every wife within stated periods ; for Moses, (as we have already seen,) most expressly prohibited even the future king/rom having many loives. (Deut. xvii. 17:) and of course, that could not but be forbidden to the people at large. But if more than one wife was allowed, and many forbidden, the question comes to be, what is meant by many *? And to that ques- tion I can only give what may be called a probable answer, and to this effect: that by many seems to be meant more than four, that number being permitted, but not more. This is the doctrine of the Talmud and the Rabbins, of which the reader will find a more detailed account in Selden de TJxore Hebraica. To their testimony and opinion I would indeed pay but little respect, in most points relating to the original Mosaic jurisprudence : but here they seem for once to be in the right. For Mohammed, who generally follows the ancient Arabian usages, in the fourth chapter of the Koran, also fixes four as the number of wives to be allowed, and commands that it be not exceeded : and be- fore the time of Moses, there would seem to have likewise been an ancient usage, in the patriarchal families, which limited polygamy to this same number, and which may also have continued among the Jews and Arabs. "We have reason to presume that this was the case from a pas- sage in Gen. chap. xxxi. 50. Jacob had four wives, Leah, Rachel, and their two maids. Laban, his father-in-law, was so little an enemy to polygamy, that instead of one of his daughters, whom Jacob wished to have, he contrived by a piece of artifice, and contrary to Jacob's inclination, to force them both upon him. But notwithstanding this, we find him in this passage requiring Jacob to take an oath that he would not take any more wives. He seems to hav<» thought with the poet, Est modus in rebus, sunt certi denique fines : nnd this modus was, in his opinion, what Jacob already hadj/oiir wives. Now as Moses does not explain what he calls many, he must, from such established custom, have presupposed it perfectly known. — Michaelis. Marriage is evidently meant by scripture and reason, to be the union of one man with one woman. When God said, " It is not good that the man should be alone ;" he promised him the help only of a single mate: " I will make him a help-meet for him." This gracious promise he soon performed in the formation of one woman ; a clear intimation of his will that only one man and one woman should be joined in wedlock. This design Adam recog- nised, and acknowledged in express terms : and his decla- ration was certainly meant as a rule for his descendants in every succeeding age : " Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh." These quotations, whict are all couched in terms of the singular number, are inc nsistent with the doctrine of polygamy. The original appointment was confirmed by our Lord in these words : " Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning, made them male and female ; and said, for this cause, shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his m- ife ; and they twain shall be one flesh 1 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh." The apostle is not less de- cisive in his direction to the churches: "Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife ; and let every woman have her own husband." But though the law is so decisive, it cannot be doubted that polygamy was introduced soon after the creation; Lamech, one of the descendants of Cain, and only the sixth person from Adam, married two wives ; he was probably the first who ventured, in this respect, to transgress the law of his Maker. This unwarrantable practice, derived from the antedilu- vian world, seems to have become very common soon after the flood ; for it is mentioned as nothing remarkable that Sarah, when she despaired of having childre;i, took her handmaid Hagar, and gave her to Abraham her husband, by whom she had a son. Both Esau and Jacob had a number of wives ; and that is undoubtedly one of the practices which Moses suffered to remain among his people, because of the hardness of their hearts, prohibiting only the high-priest to have more than one wife. Every transgression of the divine law is attended by its corresponding punishment. Polygamy has proved in all ages, and in all countries where it has been suffered, a teeming source of evil. The jealousy and bitter conten- tions in the family of Abraham, and of his grandson Jacob, which proceeded from that cause, are well known ; and still more deplorable were the dissensions which convulsed the house, and shook the throne of David. Such mischiefs are the natural and necessary effects of the practice ; for polygamy divides the affections of the husband, and by consequence, generates incurable jealousies and conten- tions among the unhappy victims of his licentious desires. To prevent his abode from becoming the scene of unceas- ing confusion and uproar, he is compelled to govern it, as the oriental polygamist still does, with despotic authority, which at once extinguishes all the rational and most endearing comforts of the conjugal state. The husbantj is a stem and unfeeling despot; his harem, a group of trembling slaves. The children espouse, with an ardour unknown to those who are placed in other circumstances, the cause of their own mother, and look upon the children of the other wives as strangers or enemies. They regard their common father with indifference or terror; while they cling to their own mother with the fondest aflfection, as the only parent in whom they feel any interest, or from whom they expect any suitable return of attention and kindness. This state of feeling and attachment, is attested by every writer on the manners of the East ; and accounts for a way of speaking so common in the scriptures : ** It is my brother, and the son of my mother." " They were my brethren," said Gideon, "the sons of my mother; as the Lord liveth, if ye had saved them alive, I would not slay you." It greatly aggravated the aflliction of David, that Chap. 2. 1 SAMUEL. 155 he had become an alien to his mother's children ; the en- mity of his brethren, the children of hi? father's other wives, or his more distant relatives, gave him less con- cern ; " I am become a stranger to my brethren, and an alien to my mother's children." The same allusion occurs in the complaint of the spouse: "Look not upon me, be- cause I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me : my mother's children were angry with me ; they made me the keeper of the vineyards." The children of one wife, scarcely looked upon the children of the other wives as their brothers and sisters at all ; and they scarcely felt more regard for their father. An Oriental, in consequence of this unnatural practice, takes little notice of an insult oflered to his father ; but expresses the utmost indignation when a word is spoken to the disadvantage of his mother. To defame or to curse her, is the last insult which his enemy can offer ; and one which he seldom or never for- gives. " Strike," cried an incensed African to his antagonist, " but do not curse my mother." — Paxton. Ver. 2. And he had two wives ; the name of the one was Hannah, and the name of the other Peninnah. The names the eastern people give to women and slaves, appear to us to be oftentimes not a little odd ; something of the same kind may, however, be remarked in the scrip- tures, though they are there more frequently of the devout kind. The author of the History of AH Bey mentions a female, whose name, Laal, signified ruby. One of the wives of Elkanah, the father of the prophet Samuel, seems to have been named in the same way, for such was the mean- ing of the word Peninnah. The plural word peninim signifies rubies, or precious stones that are red. Lam. iv. 7. If both these ladies were called by names that in their respective languages signified a ruby, probably both one and the other were so denominated, either from the florid- ness of their complexion, or the contrary to a ruby teint : for it may be understood either way. — Burder. Ver. 11. And she vowed a vow, and said, O Lord of hosts, if thou wilt indeed look on the affliction of thy handmaid, and remember me, and not forget thy handmaid, but wilt give unto thy handmaid a man-child, then I will give him unto the Lord all the days of his life, and there shall no razor come upon his head. Among these vows of abstinence, may be classed those c. " IS'azaritism, although they have also something in com- n on with the first species, and are, as it were, a mixture of both kinds. A Nazarite, during the continuance of his vow, durst drink no wine nor strong drink ; nor eat of the fruit of the vine, either grapes or raisins ; nor come near any dead body ; or otherwise wittingly defile himself. He was also obliged to let his hair grow. At the termination of the period of his- vow, he had to make certain offerings prescribed by Moses, and what other offerings he had vowed besides ; as also to cut off his hair, and burn it on the altar, and then first drink wine again at the offering- feast. These ordinances, however, rather belong to the ceremonial law, than to the Mosaical jurisprudence, of which I here treat. It is only necessary to attend to this further circumstance, that vows of Nazaritism were not an original institution of Moses, but of more ancient, and probably of Egyptian, origin ; and that, in his laws, he only gives certain injunctions concerning them, partly to estab- lish the ceremonies and laws of such vows, and partly to prevent people from making them to, or letting their hair grow in honour of, any other than the true God. What typical views he may have had in the ceremonies he pre- scribed, it forms no part of my present subject, in which I nverely consider the Mosaic laws on the principles of juris- prudence, but rather belongs to theology, to ascertain. But that before the Mosaic law was given there had been Naza- rites among the Israelites, is manifest from the following circumstance: The ordinance of Moses concerning the Nazarites, which stands in chap. vi. of Numbers, was given in the second year after the departure from Egypt ; but in an earlier law concerning the sabbatical year, which was made in the Jirst year, Moses adopts a figurative ex- pression from Nazaritism, calling the vines, which in that year were not to be pruned, Nazarites, Lev. xxv. 5. The thing itself must, therefore, have been already in use, and that for a long period ; because such figurative expressions, particularly in agriculture, gardening, and rural economy, do not succeed to the proper signification even of the most familiar and best-known terms, till after a lapse of many years. The vow of Nazaritism was not necessarily, nor usually, of perpetual endurance; and hence Moses ordain- ed what offerings should be made at its termination or dis- continuance. In latter times, it is true, we have, in the case of Samson, an example of a person devoted by his parents to be a Nazarite for life ; but even here, Nazaritism was not understood in its whole extent, as prescribed in the Mosaic law; for Samson plainly deviated from it, when he attacked and defeated the Philistines, from whose dead bodies a strict Nazarite must have fled, to avoid defilement. Of such perpetual Nazaritism, however, Moses does not at all treat in his laws; and, of course, does not say whether, like other vows, it could have been redeemed, had it proved a hardship to a son to abstain from wine all his life. Ac- cording to the analogy of the other laws of Moses on this subject, it should have been redeemable. — Michaelis. It frequently happens after the birth of a son, that if the parent be in distress, or the child sick, or that there be any other cause of grief, the mother makes a vow, that no razor shall come upon the child's head for a certain portion of time, and sometimes for all his life. 1 Sam. i. II. If the child recovers, and the cause of grief be removed, and if the vow be but for a time, so that the mother's vow be ful- filled, then she shaves his head at the end of the time pre- scribed, makes a small entertainment, collects money and other things from her relations and fAends, which are sent as Tiezers (offerings) to the mosque at Kerbelah, and are there consecrated. Numbers vi. — Morier. Ver. 12. And it came to pass, as she continued praying before the Lord, that Eli marked her mouth. Hannah, the wife of Elkanah, was steril, but she had an intense desire to be the mother of a " man-child," and she went to the " temple of the Lord" to vow, if he would give her one, that she would " give him unto the Lord all the days of his life — there shall no razor come upon his head." How often do we witness a similar scene. See the afflicted wife prostrate in the dust before the temple of her god : she earnestly entreats the deity to give unto her a "male child,'* " Ah ! then will my husband love me~then will my neigh- bours cease to reproach me — Ah ! my god, a male child, a male child— he shall be called by thy name— and sacred shall be his hair." — Roberts. CHAPTER II. Ver. 1. And Hannah prayed, and said, My heart rejoiceth in the Lord ; my horn is exalted in the Lord. In this and many other parts of scripture, mention is made of the exaltation of the horn. Colonel Light thus describes the dress of the Druses. " The females of both Maronixs and Druses appear in a coarse blue jacket and petticoat, without stockings, their hair platted, hanging down in long tails behind. On their heads they wore a tin or silver coni- cal tube about twelve inches lorig, and perhaps t-wace the size of a common post-horn ; over which was thrown a white piece of linen, that completely enveloped their body, and gives a most singular and ghost-like appearance. Upon Mount Lebanon the wife of the emir sometimes made hex appearance in the costume of the country, adorned with a golden horn on her head, enriched with" precious stones, instead of the ordinary one of the other women of the coun- try." — Burder. "One of the most extraordinary parts of the attire of the female Druses is a silver horn, sometimes studded with jewels, worn on their heads in various positions, distin- gruishing their different conditions. A married womaij has it affixed on the right side of the head, a widow on i^* left, and a virgin is pointed out by its being placed on tbi very crown; over this silver projection the long veil t 156 1 SAMUEL. ChAjP. 4 thrown, with which they so completely conceal their faces, as rarely to leave more than one eye visible."— Macmichel. This woman, who was a Christian, wore on her head a hollow silver horn, rearing itself upward obliquely from her forehead, being four or five inches in diameter at the root, and pointed at its extreme. — Buckingham. About two years ago, some of our Indian ships brought over a number of Sepoys, who did duty as marines on the voyage ; these were newly clothed in England, and pre- sented to the king. Perhaps there were but few, possibly not one, who, having the opportunity of seeing these soldiers, made the same observations as the writer of this article, respecting the helmets worn on their heads. These helmets appeared to be made of stout leather, or other strong sub- stance ; they were oval and nearly flat, like the trencher caps worn at our universities : in the centre rose a head- piece, or crown, ornamented with feathers, &c. and on the front, directly over the forehead, was a. steel Horn, rising as it were from a short stem, and then assuming the form of one of our extinguishers, used to extinguish the light of a ::andle. It appeared, also, that the comparison of such a military horn to the horn of a reem, (the unicorn of our translators,) the rhinoceros, was extremely applicable : for having seen the great rhinoceros at the menagerie at Versailles, we rec- ollected the resemblance perfectly. Whether we should be justified in referring this part of dress to the military only, may be questioned ; because Hannah, for instance, .says, " My horn is exalted." I Sam. ii. 1. But women, oc- casionally, might adopt, as parts of dress, ornaments not altogether unlike this horn, even if this form of speech were not derived originally from the soldiers' dress, and trans- ferred to a notorious disposition of mind ; or to other in- stances. This also diminishes the apparent strangeness of Zedekiah's conduct, 1 Kings xxii. 11, who made himself HORNS of iron, and said, " Thus saith the Lord, With these" military insignia, " shalt thou push the Syrians until thou hast consumed them." We are apt to conceive of these horns, as projecting, like bulls' horns, on each side of Zede- kiah's head. How different from the real fact ! Zedekiah, though he pretended to be a prophet, did not wish to be thought mad, to which imputation such an appearance would have subjected him : whereas, he only acted the hero, — the hero returning in military triumph : it was little more than a flourish with a spontoon. In corroboration of this idea, let us hear Mr. Bruce, who first elucidated this subject by actual observation : — " One thing remarkable in this cavalcade, which I ob- served, was the headdress of the governors of provinces. A large broad fillet was bound upon their forehead, and tied behind their head. In the middle of this was a horn, or conical piece of silver, gilt, about four inches long, much in the shape of our common candle extinguishers. This is called kern {\'^\>) or horn, and is only worn in reviews, or parades after victory. This I apprehend, like all other of their usages, is taken from the Hebrews, and the several allusions made in scripture to it, arises from this practice : — ' I said to the wicked. Lift not up the horn,' — ' Lift not up your horn on high ; speak not with a stiff neck.' — ' The horn of the righteous shall be exalted with honour.' "—Tay- lor in Calmet. Ver. 5. They that were full have hired out them- selves for bread. A man of high caste, or one who was once in affluence, will almost as soon die as work for food; and, generally speaking, such is the pity felt for those people, that there are alvi'ays some who will give a trifle to supply their wants. It is a phrase indicative of great misery to say, " The once rich man is now hiring himself out for conjee," (gruel.) — Roberts. Ver. 8. He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and Hfteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them in- herit the throne of glory. In preparing their victuals, the Orientals are, from the extreme scarcity of wood in many countries, reduced to use cowdung for fuel. At Aleppo, the inhabitants use wood and charcoal in their rooms, but heat their bath? with cowdung, the parings of fruit, and other things of a similar kind, which they employ people to gather lor that purpose. In Egypt, according to Pitts, the scarcity oi wood is so great, "that at Cairo they commonly heat iheir ovens with horse or cow dung, or dirt of the streets ; what \ wood they have, being brought from the shores of the Black Sea, and sold by weight. Chardin attests the same fact : " The eastern people always used cowdung for ba- king, boiling a pot, and dressing all kinds of victuals that are easily cooked, especially in countries that have but little wood ;" and Dr. Russel remarks, in a note, that " the Arabs carefully collect the dung of the sheep and camel, as well as that of the cow; and that the dung, offals, and other matters used in the bagnios, after having been new gather- ed in the streets, are carried out of the city, and laid in great heaps to dry, where they become very offensive. They are intolerably disagreeable, while drying, in the town adjoining to the bagnios ; and are so at all times when it rains, though they be stacked, pressed hard together, and thatched at top." These statements exhibit, in a very strong light, the extreme misery of the Jews, who escaped from the devouring sword of Nebuchadnezzar : " They that fed delicately, are desolate in the streets ; they that were brought up in scarlet, embrace dunghills." To embrace dunghills, is a species of wretchedness, perhaps unknown to us in the history of modern warfare ; but it presents a dreadful and appalling image, when the circumstances to which it alludes are recollected. What can be imagined more distressing to those who lived delicately, than to wan- der without food in the streets^ What more disgusting and terrible to those who had been clothed in rich and splen- did garments, than to be forced by the destruction of their palaces, to seek shelter among stacks of dung, the filth and stench of which it is almost impossible to endure. The dunghill, it appears from holy writ, is one of the common retreats of the mendicant, which imparts an exquisite force and beauty to a passage in the song of Hannah : " He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifleth the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory." The change in the cir- cumstances of that excellent woman, she reckoned as great, (and it was to her not less unexpected,) as the elevation of a poor despised beggar, from a nauseous and polluting dunghill, rendered ten times more foetid by the intense heat of an oriental sun, to one of the highest and most splendid stations on earth. — Paxton. Ver. 24. Nay, my sons ; for yt is no good report that I hear: ye make the Lord's people to transgress. This affectionate form of speech may be heard in the mouth of every father. Thus, it is not common to mention the name, but my eldest, my youngest son, (or some other epithet to designate the one he wants.) " My sons, listen to the voice of your father." In passing through a village, a man or woman maybe heard in every corner bawling out, " Maganea," i. e. O son, or " Magalea," O daughter, " come hither ; I want you." — Roberts. Ver. 31. Behold, the days come that I will cut off thine arm, and the arm of thy father's house, that there shall not be an old man in thy house. People, in cursing each other, say, " In thy family may there never be an old man," meaning, may all die in youth. " Alas! alas ! there has not been an old man in that family for many generations." — Roberts. CHAPTER IV. Ver. 12. And there ran a man of Benjamin out of the army, and came to Shiloh the same day, with his clothes rent, and with earth upon his head. He indulged his grief to a violent degree, beating his breast, and, among his other exclamations, frequently mnde use of one, very illustrative of that ancient act of grie* Chap. 4 — 7. 1 SAMUEL. 157 heaping ashes on the /lead. He said, Ahi cheh hak be ser-e- mun amed, What earth has come on my head 1 repeating this with a constant intermixture of Ah, wahi, which he would continue to repeat for above fifty limes, in a whining piteous voice, lowering its tone till it became scarcely audi- ble, and then continuing it solo voce, until he broke out again into a new exclamation. — Morier. Ver. 13. And when he came, lo, Eli sat upon a seat by the wayside watching: for his heart trembled for the ark of God. And when the man came into the city, and told it, all the city cried out. Sitting on a cushion is, with the Orientels, an expression of honour, and the preparing a seat for a person of distinc- tion seems to mean, laying things of this kind on a place where such a one is to sit. " It is the custom of Asia,^' Sir J. Chardin informs us, " for persons in common not to go into the shops of that country, which are mostly small, but there are wooden seats, on the outside, where people sit down, and if it happens to be a man of quality, they lay a cushion there." He also informs us, " that people of qual- ity cause carpets and cushions to be carried everywhere, that they like, in order to repose themselves upon them more agreeably." When Job speaks of his preparing his seat, ch. xxix. 7, it is extremely natural to understand him of his sending his servants, to lay a cushion and a car- pet on one of the public seats there, or something of that sort, as Sir John supposes ; but I do not imagine a seat in the street, means a seat by a shop. Job is speaking evi- dently of his sitting there as a ruler among his people. Eli's seat by the wayside, was a seat adorned, we may believe, after the same manner. He did not sit in a man- ner unbecoming so dignified a personage. — Harmer. CHAPTER VI. Ver. 4. Then said they, What shall he the tres- pass-offering which we shall return to him ? They answered, Five golden emerods, and five golden mice, according to the number of the lords of the Philistines : for one plague was on you all, and on your lords. 5. Wherefore ye shall make images of your emerods, and images of your mice that mar the land ; and ye shall give glory unto the God of Israel : peradven- ture he will lighten his hand from off you, and from off your gods, and from off your land. This animal (the mouse) is so very diminutive, that the Jewish naturalist places it among the reptiles, refusing it the honour of appearing among the quadrupeds. But, small and apparently insignificant as it is, in the oriental regions it often produces greater calamities than are expe- rienced from all the beasts of prey with which they are in- fested. Formidable by its activity, its voraciousness, and its countless numbers, it lays waste the fields of Palestine and Syria, devours their harvests, and spreads famine and wretchedness among the helpless inhabitants. The extent and severity ofthe distress in which its ravages frequently in- volve the people of those countries, are sufliciently attested by the offering of five golden mice, from the lords of the Philistines, to appease the wrath of God, and a vert the plague under which they had so greatly suffered. The account of this transaction is recorded in the first book of Samuel, and runs in these terms : " Then said they, what shall be the trespass-offering which we shall return to him 1 They an- swered, Five golden emerods, and five golden mice, accord- ing to the number of the lords of the Philistines : for one plague was on you all, and on your lords. Wherefore ye shall make images of your emerods, and of your mice that martheland; and ye shall give gloryuntothe God of Israel: perad venture he will lighten his hand from off you, and from off your gods, and from off your land." These words un- doubtedly intimate, that Palestine was very often visited by this scourge, and that the sufferings of its inhabitants were very severe, Thedevastationsof thislittle destructive crea- ture were so frequent, so extensive, and followed by con- sequences so dreadful, that even the unenlightened Philis- tines considered them as an immediate judgment from God himself. But this terrible scourge was not peculiar to Pal- estine: Strabo mentions that so vast a multitude of mice sometimes invaded Spain, as to produce a destructive pesti- lence ; and in Cantabria, the Romans, by setting a price on a certain measure of these animals, escaped With diffi- culty from the same calamity. In other parts of Italy, the number of field-mice was so" great, that some ofthe inhab- itants were forced to leave the country. In Thrace, the frogs and mice sometimes united their hordes, and com- pelled the inhabitants to seek new settlements. In modern times, instances of the same calamity are not wanting. About the beginning of the twelfth century, innumerable swarms of locusts and mice, during four successive years, so completely ravaged that country, as to produce almost a total failure of the necessaries of life. So great and general was the distress of the people, that a kind of peni- tential council was held at Naplouse, in the year 1120, for the reformation of manners, and to invoke the mercy of the Almighty, who had been provoked by their sins to in- flict upon them such terrible judgments. — Paxton. Ver. 5. Wherefore ye shall make images of your emerods, and images of your mice that mar the land ; and ye shall give glory unto the God of Israel. This command was given by the heathen priests and di- viners to the Philistines, who were smitten with emerods, and whose land was nearly destroyed by the mice. It is a remarkable fact, that when the Hindoos ar^ afllicted in any particular member, (or in the person generally,) they make an image to represent the afflicted part, and send it to the temple of Kanda Swamy, the Scandan of Bengal, in order to get relieved from their trouble. The temple of Kattara- gam (sacred ■ to Scandan) is famous, in all parts of the East, for the cures which have been performed by the deity there. Hence may be seen pilgrims at its shrine, suffering under every kind of disease, "who have walked, or have been carried, from an immense distance. The images presented are generally made of silver, and I have seven of them in my possession, which are offerings in the famous temple already mentioned. The first represents a boy with a very large belly, which has probably been pre- sented by the parents for'their child labouring undei that (very common) complaint. The second is that of an in- fant, probably sent by a mother who had a sick infant, or who, being herself in a state of pregnancy, had some fears respecting the future. The third is, I suppose, intended to represent an old man, who may have made a vow in his sickness, that he would present an image of silver to the temple, should he recover. — Roberts. {See Engraving.^ CHAPTER VII. Ver. 5, And Samuel said, Gather all Israel to Mizpeh, and I will pray for you unto the Lord. Aware ofthe dangers and calamities of war, ancient Is- rael were accustomed to perform very solemn devotions before they took the field: and it would seem, they had certain places particularly appropriated to this purpose. Samuel convened the people to Mizpeh, in order to pre- pare, by a solemn address to the throne of Jehovah, for the war which they meditated against the Philistines. " And Samuel said. Gather all Israel to Mizpeh, and I will pray for you unto the Lord." At other times, they asked coun- sel of God by the Urim and Thummim, or by a prophet of the Lord. Such a custom was common in Eg\'pt, when Pococke visited that country. Near Cairo, says that trav- eller, beyond the mosque of Sheik Duisse, and in the neigh- bourhood of a burial-place ofthe sons of some pashas, on a hill, is a solid building of stone about three feet wide, built with ten steps, being at the top about three feet square, on which the sheik mounts to pray on an extraordinary oc- casion, as when all the people go out at the beginning of a war; and also when the Nile does not rise as they expect it should ; and such a place, they have without ail the towns of Turkey. — Paxton. Ver. 6. And they gathered together to Mizpeh, and drew water, and poured it out before the 158' 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 7— -9. Lord, and fasted on that da5^ and said there, We have sinned against the Lord. Samuel had been reproving the people for their sins, and exhorting them to repent, and come to Mizpeh to fast and pray, and confess their sins. They complied with his di- rections, and in confirmation of the solemn vows, they poured out water before the Lord, to show that their words and promises had gone forth, and were " as water spilt on the ground, which cannot be gathered up again." To pour water on the ground is a very ancient way of taking a solemri, oath in the East. When the god Vishnoo, in the disguise of a dwarf, requested the giant Maha-Ville (Bali) to grant him one step of his kingdom, the favour was con- ceded, and CONFIRMED by Maha-Ville pouring out water before the dwarf. But in that ancient work, "the Scanda Purcina, where the account is given of the marriage of the god Siva with Parvati, it is said of the father, " He placed the hand of the goddess Parvati, genitress of the world, in the hand of Parama Easuran, (Siva,) and, pouring out the WATER, said, ' I give her with a joyful heart.' " This, there- fore, was also done in confirmation of the compact. The children of Israel,, in their misery, came before the Lord : they wept, they fasted, and prayed, and made their solemn vows ; and, in confirmation of their promises, they "poured out water before the Lord ! " — Roberts, CHAPTER VIII. Ver. 6. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto the Lord. Hebrew, " was evil in the eyes of Samuel." When any thing gives displeasure to another, it is said to be evil in his eyes. " This thing is evil in his sight." " Alas ! my lord, I am evil in your sight !" — Roberts. CHAPTER IX. Ver. 7. Then said Saul to his servant, but, behold, if we go, what shall we bring the man ? for the bread is spent in our vessels, and there is not a present to bring to the man of God : what ^ have we? In no quarter of the world, is the difference of ranks in society maintained with more scrupulous exactness than in Asia. The intercourse among the various classes of mankind, which originate in the unequal distributions of creating wisdom, or providential arrangement, is regulated by laws,, which, like those of the Medes and Persians, suf- fer almost no change from the lapse of time, or the fluc- tuation of human affairs. To these laws, which have ex- tended their influence far beyond the limits of the East, the sacred writers make frequent allusions. No mark of es- teem is more common through all the oriental regions, none more imperiously required by the rules of good breed- ing, than a present. WheA Mr. Maundrell and his party waited upon Ostan, the basha of Tripoli, he was obliged to send his present before him to secure a favourable re- ception. It is even reckoned uncivil in that country, to make a visit without an offering in the hand. The no- bility, and officers of government, expect it as a kind of trib- ute due to their character and authority ; and look upon themselves as affronted, and even defrauded, when this compliment is omitted. So common is the custom, that in familiar intercourse among persons of inferior station, they seldom neglect to bring a flower, an orange, a few dates or .•A±.snes, or some such token of respect, to the person whom they visit. In Egypt the custom is equally prevalent : the visits of that people, which are very frequent in the course of the year, are always preceded by presents of various kinds, according to their station and property. So essential to human and civil intercourse are presents considered in the East, that, says Mr. Bruce, " whether it be dates or diamonds, they are so much a part of their manners, that without them an inferior will never be at peace in his own .nind, or think that he has a hold of his superior for his favour or protection." Sir John Chardin affirms, that "the custom of making presents to the great, was universal in the East ; and that every thing is received even by the great lords of the country, fruit, pullets, a lamb. Every one gives what is most at hand, and has a relation to his profession ; and those who have no particular profession, give money. As it is accounted an honour to receive presents of this sort, they receive them in public ; and even choose to do it when they have most company." " Throughout the East," says Du Tott, '■ gifts are always the mark of honour." This custom is, perhaps, one of the most ancient in the world. Solomon evidently alludes to it in that proverb: " A man's gift maketh room for him, and bringeth him before great men." We recognise it in the reply of Saul to his servant, when he proposed to consult the prophet Samuel about the object of their journey: " If we go, what shall we bring the man of God 1 for the bread is spent in our vessels, and there is not a present to bring to the man of God. What have we V Saul was inclined at first to offer the seer, who was at the same time the chief magis- trate in Israel, a piece of bread, till he recollected it was all spent, and then agreed to present him with " the fourth part of a shekel of silver," in value about a sixpence. It could not then be their design, by offering such a trifle, to purchase his services, but merely to show him that custom- ary mark of respect to which he was entitled. Nor were the prophets of the Lord a set of mercenary pretenders to the knowledge of future events, who sold their services to the anxious mquirer for a large reward. Had they refused to accept of such presents, they would have been guilty of transgressing an established rule of good manners, and of insulting the persons by whom they were offered. When Elisha refused, with an oath, to accept of the present which Naaman the Syrian urged him to receive, it was not be- cause he thought it either unlawful or improper to receive a gift, for he did not hesitate to accept of presents from his owti people ; nor was the prophet regardless of an estab- lished custom, which offended no precept of the divine law, or disposed to wound, without necessity, the feelings of the Syrian grandee ; but because he would not put it in the power of Naaman to say he had enriched the prophet of Jehovah ; and by this act of self-denial, it is probable he was desirous of recommending the character and service of the true God to that illustrious stranger. — Paxton. Such as are prejudiced against the sacred history, and unacquainted with eastern customs, may be ready, from the donations to the prophets, to imagine they were a mer- cenary set of people, and rudely to rank them with cunning men and fortunetellers, who will not from principles of benevolence reveal those secrets, or foretel those future events, of the knowledge of which they are supposed to be ■ possessed ; but demand of the anxious inquirer a large re- ward. This, however, will make impressions on none but those who know not the oriental usages, which Maundrell long since applied, with such clearness and force, to one of the most exceptionable passages of the Old Testament,, that he has sufficiently satisfied the mind upon this point. As he has expressly applied it to a passage of scripture, it would not have been agreeable to my design to have men- tioned this circumstance, had I not had some additional remarks to make upon this head, which possibly may not be ungrateful to the curious reader, and which therefore 1 shall here set down. I suppose my reader acquainted with Maundrell ; but it will be proper, Yor the sake of perspicu- ity, first to recite at full length that passage in him I refer t ■). " Thursday, March 11. This day we all dined at Con- sul Hastings's house ; and al\er dinner went to wait upon Ostan, the basha of Tripoli, having first sent our present, as the manner is among the Turks, to procure a propitious reception. It is counted uncivil to visit in this country withc^ut an ofl^ering in hand. All great men expect it as a kind of tribute due to their character and authority; and look upon themselves as affronted, and indeed defrauded, when this compliment is omitted. Even in familiar visits, among inferior people, you shall seldom have them come without bringing a flower, or an orange, or some other such token of their respect to the person visited : the Turks in this point keeping up the ancient oriental customs hinted 1 Sam. ix. 7. If we go, says Saul, what shall we bring th€ man of GodI there is not a present, &c. which words are questionless to be understood in conformity to this eastern custom, as relating to a token of respect, arid not a price of divination." Maundrell does not tell us what the present was which they made Ostan. It will be more entirely satisfying to Chap. 9. 1 SAMUEL. 159 the mind to observe, that in the East they not only univer- sally send before them a present, or carry one with them, especially when they visit superiors, either civil or ecclesi- astical ; but that this present is frequently a piece of money, and that of no very great value. So Dr. Pococke tells us, that he presented an Arab sheik of an illustrious descent, on whom he waited, and who attended him to the ancient Hierapolis, with a piece of money, which he was told he expecLed ; and that in Egypt an aga being dissatisfied with the present he made him, he sent for the doctor's servant, and told him, that he ought to have given him a piece of cloth, and, if he had none, two sequins, worth about a guinea, must be brought to him, otherwise he should see him no more, with which demand he complied. In one case a j)iece of money was expected, in the other two sequins de- manded. A trifling present of money to a person of dis- tinction among us would be an affront ; it is not however, it seems, in the East. Agreeably to these accounts of Pococke, we are told in the travels of Egmont and Heyman, that the well of Joseph in the castle of Cairo is not to be seen without leave from the commandant ; which having obtained, they, in return, presented him with a sequin. These instances are curious exemplifications of Mr. Maun- drell's account of the nature of some of the eastern presents, and ought by no means to be omitted in collections of the kind 1 am now making. How much happier was the cul- tivation of Mr. Maundrell's genius than of St. Jerome's ! Though this father lived so many years in the East, and might have advantageously applied the remains of their ancient customs to the elucidation of scripture, to which, if he was a stranger, he must have been an egregiously negligent observer ; yet we find him, in his comment on Micah iii. 11, roundly declaring, that by a prophet's re- ceiving money, his prophesying became divination. And when he afterward mentions this case of Saul's application to Samuel, as what he fojresaw might be objected to him, he endeavours to avoid 'the difficulty, by saying, We do not find that Samuel accepted it, or that they even ventured to offer it ; or if it must be supposed that he received it, that it was rather to be considered as money presented to the taber- nacle, than the reward of prophesying. How embarrassed was the saint by a circumstance capable of the most clear explanation ! Fond of allegorizing, he neglected the surest methods of interpretation, for which he had peculiar ad- vantages ; how different are the rewards of divination, which were to be earned, from the unconditional presents that were made to persons of figure upon being introduced into their presence ! Before I quit this observation, I can- not forbear remarking, that there are other things present- ed in the East, besides money, which appear to us extremely low and mean, unworthy the quality of those that ofi'er them, or of those to whom they are presented ; and conse- quently that we must be extremely unqualified to judge of these oriental compliments. In what light might a Euro- pean wit place the present of a governor of an Egyptian village, who sent to a British consul fifty eggs as a mark of respect, and that in a country wherethey are so cheap as to be sold at the rate of ten for a penny ? — Harmer. A present always precedes the man who is to ask a fa- vour. Those who come on a complimentary visit, or to ask a favour, always present a lime, or a nosegay, with a graceful bow, to propitiate their benefactor. — Roberts. Ver. 13. Now the Lord had told Samuel in his The priests have a remarkable custom of whispering something in the ear of those who are to be initiated. When a boy has reached the age of eight, he is eligible to have the IJhatheasum whispered in his right ear. The I communication is generally made in the Grandam lan- ! guage, which, of course, is not understood: they do, how- I ever, sometimes speak in familiar speech ; but it will never I be repeated, for the priest assures him, should he do this, j his head will split in two. This ceremony is believed to j have the power of a charm, and to possess talismanic in- I fluence. It is sometimes very expensive, but the benefits are believed to be so great as to warrant the expense. — Roberts. Ver. 23. And Samuel said unto the cook, Bring- the portion which I gave thee, of which I said unto thee, S^. t it by ih^e. 24. And the cook took up the sJi0!J;dr". and that which was upon it, and set it be:bro Saul. And Samuel said, Behold that which is left ! set it before thee, and eat : for unto this time hath it been kept for thee, since I said, 1 have invited the people. So Saul did eat with Samuel that day. The shoulder of a lamb well roasted, and covered with butter and milk, is another d? \cacy, which the oriental greatly value. This explains the reason why Samuel or- dered it to oe set before his future sovereign, as well as what that was which was upon it, the butter and milk of which the sacred historian takes so particular notice. — This was by no means a contemptible dish for a royal enter- tainment, as some have alleged; but on the contrary, one of the most delicious which could be set before the future anointed of Jehovah. It appears from the accounts of travellers, that lamb is, in those parts of the world, ex- tremely delicate. One, says Chardin, must have eaten of it in several places of Persia, Media, and Mesopotamia, and of their kids, to form a conception of the moisture, taste, delicacy, and fat of this animal; and as the eastern people are no friends of game, nor of fish, nor fowls, their most delicate food is the lamb and the kid. It is therefore not without reason, the sacred writers often speak of the lamb and the kid, as the most agreeable food in those countries ; and that the holy Psalmist celebrates the bless- ings of salva'ion, and particularly the spiritual comforts of the heaven-born soul, under the figure of " marrow and fatness." — Paxton. Ver, 25. And when they were come down from the high place into the city, Samuel communed with Saul upon the top of the house. 26. And they arose early : and it came to pass, about the spring of the day, that Samuel called Saul to the top of the house, saying, Up, that I may send thee away. And Saul arose, and they went out both of them, he and Samuel, abroad. Egmont and He5rman tell us, that at Caipha, at the foot of Mount Carmel, " the houses are small and flat-roofed, where, during the summer, the inhabitants sleep in arbours made of the boughs of trees." They mention also tents of rushes on the flat roofs of the houses at Tiberias, which are doubtless for the same purpose, though they do not say so. Dr. Pococke in like manner tells us, "that when he was at Tiberias in Galilee, he was entertained by the sheik's steward, the sheik himself having much company with him, but sending him provisions from his own kitch- en, and that they supped on the top of the house for cool- ness, according to their custom, and lodged there likewise, in a sort of closet, about eight feet square, of a wicker-work, plastered round towards the bottom, but without any door, each person having his cell." In Galilee then we find they lodged a stranger, whom they treated with respect, on the top of the house, and even caused him to sup there. Thi"^ was the latter end of May. This writer is more distinct than the others on this point, and I have recited his ac- count at large, because it may perhaps lead to the true ex- planation of 1 Sam. ix. 25, 26, which verses tell us, that after they descended from the high place, Samuel con- versed with Saul (ijn Vj? til haggag) on the house-top; and that at the spring of the day Samuel called Saul to the housetop ; or, as it may be equally well translated, on the housetop; that is, Samuel conversed with him for coolness on the housetop in the evening, and in the mornirg called Saul, who had lodged there all night, and was not got up, saying. Up., that 1 may send thee away. The Septuagini seem to have understood it very much in this light, for they thus translate the passage, And. they spread a bed for Saul on the housetop^ and he slept ; which shov/s how suitable this explanation is to those that are acquainted with eastern customs. As it is represented in our translation, Samuel called Saul to the housetop in the morning; but no account can be easily given for this ; it does not appear to have been for secrecy, for he did not anoint then, but after he had lefll Samuel's house, for which transaction the prophet ex- 160 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 10—14; pressly required secrecy, " As they were going down to the end of the city, Samuel said to Saul, bid the servant pass on before us, and he passed on, but stand thou still awhile, that I may show thee the word of God." This sleeping on the terraces of their houses is only in summer- time. By this then we may determine, in the general, that this secret inauguration of Saul»was in that part of the year. Dr. Shaw has cited this passage concerning Samuel and Saul, when mentioning the various uses to which the peo- ple of the East put the flat roofs of their houses, though without explaining it; but he has not mentioned, among the other scriptures, that relating to Nebuchadnezzar, who is described by the prophet as Avalking on the roof of his palace, and taking a view of Babylon, when he fell, upon surveying that mighty city, into that haughty soliloquy which brought after it a dreadful humiliation. This is rhe more to be regretted, because though many have, all have not considered the passage in this light. Our own translation in particular has not, but renders the words, " He walked in the palace of the kingdom of Babylon," Dan. iv. 29, and has thrown the other reading ''upon the palace," into the margin, as less preferable. But to those that are acquaint- ed with eastern customs, who recollect the passage, which Dr. Shaw, it seems, did not, there cannot be any doubt how it is to be understood. "Sur la terrasse," says Sir J. Chardin, in his MS. note on this place, " pour le plaisir de la vue, pour de la considerer la ville, et pour prendre la frais, et c'est ce que prouve, le verset suivant." That is, he walked upon the terrace, for the pleasure of the pros- pect, to take a view of the city, and to enjoy the fresh air, which the following verse proves. Nothing can be more natural than this interpretation. — Harmer. CHAPTER X. Ver. 5, When thou art come hither to the city, thou shalt meet a company of prophets coming- down from the high place, with a psaltery, and a tabret, and a pipe, and a harp before them ; and they shall prophesy. The prophets in the ordinary modes of prophesying, were accustomed to compose their hymns to some musical instrument ; and there could be but little difficulty in adapt- ing their effusions to a measure which required, probably, no great restrictions in a language so free and uncontrolled as the Hebrew. The Jews conceived that music calmed the passions, and prepared the mind for the reception of the prophetic influence. It is probable, that the prophets on these occasions did not usually perform themselves on the musical instruments, but rather accompanied the strains of the minstrel with their voice. — (Lowth.) It has been the practice of all nations to adapt their religious worship to music, which the fabulous accounts of antiquity derived from heaven, — Burder. Yer. 27. But the children of Belial said, How shall this man save us? And they despised him, and brought him no presents : but he held his peace. See on Ps. 76. 11. CHAPTER XL Ver. 2. Then Nahash the Ammonite came up, and encamped against Jabesh-gilead : and all the men of Jabesh said unto Nahash, Make a covenant with us, and we will serve thee. 2. And Nahash the Ammonite answered them, On this condition will I make a covenant with you, that I may thrust out all your right eyes. This cruel practice was very common, formerly, in the East, and even yet prevails in some places. Mr. Hanway gives several instances of it. " Mohammed Khan, (not long after I left Persia,) his eyes were cut out." Page 224. " The close of this hideous scene of punishment, was an order to cut out the eyes of this unhappy man : the soldiers were dragging him to this execution, while he begged. With bitter cries, that he might rather suffer death." 'Page 203. " Sadoc Aga had his beard cut off, his face was rubbed with dirt, and his eyes were cut out." Page 204. " As we approached Astrabad, we met several armed horsemen, carrying home the peasants whose eyes had been put out, the blood yet running down their faces.* Page 201. Chardin relates an instance of a king of Imi- retta, who lived in this condition. Page 160. — Burder. Ver. 4. Then came the messengers to Gibeah of Saul, and told the tidings in the ears of the people : and all the people lifted up their voices, and wept. See on Jer, 6. 1. CHAPTER XII. Ver. 16. Now therefore stand and see this great thing which the Lord will do before your eyes. 17. /5 i^ not wheat-harvest to-day ? I will call unto the Lord, and he shall send thunder and rain ; that ye may perceive and see that your wickedness is great, which ye have done in the sight of the Lord, in asking you a king. Though the summer in Syria is commonly dry, the heavens are sometimes overcast, and a smart thunder- shower suddenly rushes down to refresh the parched soil. One of these fell at Aleppo in the night between the first and second of July, 1743 ; but it was regarded as a yery uncommon occurrence at that season. It is probably still more extraordinary at Jerusalem; for Jerome, who lived long in Palestine, denies, in his commentary on Amos, that he had ever seen rain in those provinces, and espe- cially in Judea, in the end of June, or in the month of July. It may, however, occasionally tall, though Jerome had never seen it, as it did at Aleppo, while Dr. Russel resided in that city. But such an occurrence by no means inval- idates the proof which ihe prophet Samuel gave of his divine mission, when he called for thunder and rain from heaven in the time of wheat-harvest ; since a very rare and unusual event immediately happening without any preceding appearance of it, upon the prediction of a person professing himself to be a prophet of the Lord, and giving it as an attestation of his sustaining that character, is a suf- ficient proof that his affirmation is true, although a similar event has sometimes happened without any such declared interposition of God, and therefore universally understood to be casual and without design. Nor should it be forgotten, that this thunderstorm in the laook of Samuel, seems to have happened in the daytime, while the people of Israel were celebrating the accession of Saul to the throne; a circum- stance which, from its singularity, added considerable energy to this event, and, perhaps, was to them a sufficient proof of the miraculous interference of Jehovah. Dr. Russel informs us, that the rains in those countries usually fall in the night, as did those extraordinary thunderstorms already mentioned, which happened in the month of July — Paxton. CHAPTER XIII. Ver. 18. And another company turned the way to Beth-horon : and another company turned t.o the way of the border that looketh to the valley of Zeboim, towards the wilderness. See on Jer. 12. 9. CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 25. And all ^Aey o/ the land came to a wood; and there was honey upon the ground. See on Ps. 81. 16. Ver, 26. And when the people were come into the wood, behold, the honey dropped. Bees, in the East, are not, as in England, kept in hives : they are all in a wild state. The forests literally flow with honey; large combs may be seen hanging on the trees as you pass along, full of honey. Hence this article is cheap and plentiful, and is much lised by the Vedahs to preserve Chap. 15—17. 1 SAMUEL. IGl the flesh of animals they catch in the chase. The ancient poets take great pleasure in speaking of the value of milk and honey.— Roberts, CHAPTER XV. '-ti-fm^ev. 9. But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the failings, and the lambs. The margin has, instead of " fatlings," of the " second sort" This curious way of designating the quality of animals finds an exact parallel among the Hindoos. They do not usually compare, as we do, by good, better, best; but first, second, or third sort. An animal of the finest pro- portions is said to be of the first sort ; the next, of the second ; and the last, the third. All the productions of art and nature are compared, as to their value, in the same way. They tell us there are three kinds of fruit they pre- fer to all others : first, gold ; second, precious stones ; and third, land. — Roberts. Ver. 33. And Samuel said, As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women. And Samuel hewed Agag in pieces before the Lord in Gilgal. See on Ezra 4. 14. Criminals were sometimes hewed in pieces, and their mangled bodies given as a prey to ravenous beasts. This punishment seems to have been extremely common in Abyssinia, when Mr. Bruce was there, and was probably handed down from the founders of that kingdom: " Coming across the market-place," says the traveller, " I had seen Za Mariam, the Ras's doorkeeper, with three men bound, one of whom he fell a-hacking to pieces in my presence ; and upon seeing me running across the place, stopping my nose, he called me to stay till he should despatch the other two, for he wanted to speak with me, as if he had been engaged about ordinary business ; that the soldiers, in consideration of his haste, immediately fell upon the other two, whose cries were still remaining in my ears ; that the hyenas at night would scarcely let me pass in the streets, when I returned from the palace; and the dogs fled into my house, to eat pieces of human carcasses at their leisure." This account elucidates the mode of execution adopted by the prophet Samuel, in relation to Agag, the king of Amalek : " And Samuel said, (-upnd) As (or, in the same identical mode) thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women. And Samuel hewed Agag in pieces before the Lord in Gilgal." This was not a sudden and passionate act of vengeance, but a deliberate act of retributive justice. That savage chieftain had hewed many prisoners to death; and therefore, by the command of Jehovah, the judge of all the earth, he is visited with the same punishment which he had cruelly used towards others. — Paxton. In Light's Travels, we are informed, that " Djezzar had reason to suspect fraud in the conduct of some of the ofticers of the seraglio : and, as he could not discover the offenders, he had between fifty and sixty of them seized, stripped naked, and laid on the ground : and to each was placed a couple of janizaries, who were ordered to hew them in pieces with their swords." — Burder. CHAPTER XVII. Ver. 6. And he had greaves of brass upon his legs, and a target of brass between his shoulders. These were necessary to defend the legs and feet from the iron stakes placed in the way by the enemy, to gall and wound their opponents. They were a part of ancient military harness, and the a-rtifices made use of by contend- ing parties rendered the precaution important,— Burder. Ver. 7. And the staff of his spear was like a weaver's beam ; and his spear's head loeighed six hundred shekels of iron ; and one bearing a shield went before him. The oriental warrior had a person who went before him 21 in the hour of danger, whose office it was to bear the great massy buckler, behind which he avoided the missile weapons of his enemy. Goliath had his armour-bearer carrying a shield before him, when he came up to defy the armies of Israel. When David went first to court, he was made armour-bearer to Saul ; and Jonathan had a young man who bore his armour before him in the day of battle. Besides the large and ponderous buckler, the gigantic Philistine had another ol smaller size called cidoti^ which we render target in one part of our version, and shield in another. It might either be held in the hand when the warrior had occasion to use it, or, at other times, be con- veniently hung about his neck, and turned behind ; and, therefore, the historian observes he had " a target of brass between his shoulders," — Paxton, Ver. 1 8. And carry these ten cheeses unto the captain of their thousand, and look how thy brethren fare. The art of coagulating milk, and converting it into cheese, was known among the Syrian shepherds, from the remotest times. Instead of runnet, they turn the milk, especially in the summer season, with sour buttermilk, the flowers of the great-headed thistle, or wild artichoke ; and, putting the curds afterward into small baskets made with rushes, or with the dwarf palm, they bind them up close, and press them. These cheeses are rarely above two or three pounds weight ; and in shape and size, resemble our penny loaves. Oriental cheeses are sometimes of so very soft a consistence, after they are pressed, and even when they are set upon the table, that they bear a very near re- semblance to curds, or to coagulated milk, which forms a very considerable part of eastern diet. But the ten cheeses which David carried to the camp of Saul, seem to have been fully formed, pressed, and sutficiently dried, to admit of their being removed from one place to another, without the frames in which they were made. — Paxton, The sons of Jesse \^ere serving in the army of Saul ; and as he probably had not heard from them for some time, he sent their brother David to take a present to the captain, to induce him to be kind to his sons ; also to bring a pledge, or token, from his sons themselves, to assure him that they were well. A person in a distant country sends to those who are interested in his welfare a ring, a lock of hair, or a piece of his nail. This is his " pledge" of health and prosperity. A man who has returned from a far coun- try, in calling upon an old friend (should he not be at home) will leave a handkerchief as a token, to testify that he had called. — Roberts. The Vulgatg illustrates this passage by translating the Hebrew words, decem formellas casei, ten little baskets of cheese, or, ten cheeses made in such baskets. To this day, in Barbary, " after turning the milk with the flowers of the_ great-headed thistle, or wild artichoke, they put the curds into small baskets, made with rushes or with the dwarf palm, and bind them up close and press them." (Shaw.) "Another offeted me milk in baskets; a circumstance that astonished me. What, exclaimed I, milk in baskets! These baskets, he continues, are very pretty, and fabricated with reeds so closely interwoven, that they will hold water, and were afterwards of much service to me for that use," (Vaillant.) " In the evening they sent us in return some baskets of milk. These baskets were made from a species of cyperus, a strong reedy grass that grew in the springs of Zaure Veld. The workmanship was exceedingly clever and neat, and the texture so close that they were capable of containing the thinnest fluid." (Barrow.) " The girls also twist cotton yam for fringes, and prepare canes, reeds, and palmetto leaves, as the boys also do, for basket making: but the making up the baskets is the men's work, who first die the materials of several curious lively colours, and then mix and weave them very prettily. They weave little bas- kets like cups also very neat, with the twigs wrought so very fine and close, as to hold any liquor without anymore to do, having no lacker or varnish: and they as ordinarily drink out of these woven cups, as out of their calabashes, which they paint very curiously. They make baskets ol several sizes for carrying their clothes, or other uses, with great variety of work; and so firm, that you may crush them, or throw them about how you will, almost with little or no damage to them." — Burder. 162 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 17. Ver. 20. And David rose up early in the morn- ing, and left the sheep with a keeper, and took, and went, as Jesse had commanded him : and he came to the trench as the host was going forth to the fight, and shouted for the battle. After the introduction of trumpets into Greece, her ar- mies generally began the attack at the sound of this war- like instrument ; but the Lacedemonians were particularly remarkable for beginning their engagements with the soft tones of the flute, which were intended to render the com- batants cool and sedate, and enable them to march with a firm and majestic step against their enemies. In the armies of Israel, the courage of the soldiers was roused and sus- tained by a concert of various instruments; in which were distinguished the martial sounds of the silver trumpet, and the gentler notes of the harp and the psaltery. In the be- ginning of their onset, they gave a general shout to en- courage and animate one another, and strike terror into their enemies. This circumstance is distinctly stated in the first book of Samuel : " And David rose up early in the morning, and left the sheep with a keeper, and took, and went, as Jesse had commanded him ; and he came to the trench, as the host was going forth to the fight, and shouted for the battle. For Israel and the Philistines had put the battle in array, army against army." This custom seems to have been used by almost every nation under heaven ; and is mentioned by all writers, who treat of martial affairs. Homer compares the confused noise of two armies in the heat of battle, to the deafening roar of torrents rushing With impetuous force from the mountains into subjacent valleys. In the wars which the Hebrews prosecuted in Canaan, and in the surrounding countries, the generals fought at the head of their armies, performing at once the part of a private soldier, and the various duties of a resolute cap- tain. In the heroic ages, the Grecian generals exposed their persons in the same way. Homer, in all his battles, places the principal officers in the front, and calls them Tpi)naj(^ai and rpi^iioi^ because they fought before their ar- mies. Thus when he led up the Trojans, the godlike Paris fought at their head ; and when Achilles sends out his sol- diers to defend the Grecian ships, having allotted to the rest of his officers their several posts, he places Patroclus and Automedon, as chief commanders, before the front. — Pax- -ON. Ver. 23. And as he talked with them, behold, there came up the champion (the Philistine of Gath, Goliath by name) out of jjfie armies of the Philistines, and spake according to the same words : and David heard them. 24. And all the men of Israel, when they saw the man, fled from him, and were sore afraid. The ancient Hebrews, like the nations around them, were wholly unacquainted with the refinements of modern warfare. From the age of Abraham, the renowned fa- ther of their tribes, they had little other business to employ their leisure hours, but feeding their flocks and herds, or tilling a few acres of land in the districts which they visited, except in Egypt, where their severe bondage was still more unfavourable to the cultivation of military habits. In such circumstances, the defence of their flocks and herds from the violence of roving hordes, which occasionallv scoured the country in quest of spoil, generally produced the only wars in which they engaged. The rapid history of the patriarchs records a sufficient number of incidents, to show, that how rude and unpolished soever they may be deemed, they were by no means deficient in personal courage ; and in the expedition of Abraham against the confederate kings, we can discern the rudimentsof that military conduct, which has ^o often siiice his time filled the world with admiration or dismay. It will be readilv admitted, that when the chosen people went up out of Egypt, where they had been long and cruelly oppressed, and in consequence of their miseries had contracted the abject and cowardly disposi- tions of the slave, they were quite incapable of warlike enterprises; but when their ^inds recovered that vigour and elevation which the fr'-.edom and hardships of the wil- derness inspired, they discovered on many trying occasions, a boldness and resolution which were never surpassed by any of their antagonists. Till the reign of David, the ar- mies of Israel were no better than a raw and undisciplined militia ; and the simplicity of their behaviour sufficiently # appears from the story of Goliath, who defied all the \p,r-* riors that fought under the banners of Saul ; and with a haughty look, and a few arrogant words, struck them with so great a terror that they fled before him. But the troops of the surrounding kingdoms were neither more courage- ous nor more skilful in the use of arms, which is evident from the history of David's captains, the first of whom en- gaged, single handed, three hundred men, and slew them at one time. And this is not the only instance of such daring and successful valour ; he was one of three warriors who defended a plot of barley, after the people had fled, eigainst the whole force of the Philistines, whom they routed with prodigious slaughter, after a desperate conflict. Nor is the sacred historian justly chargeable with transgressing the rules of probability in such relations, which, however strange and incredible they may appear to us, exactly ac- cord with the manners of the times in which he wrote. Homer often introduces Achilles, Hector, and other heroes engaging, and, by the valour of their own arm, putting to flight whole squadrons of their enemies. Such feats are by no means uncommon in the history of the rude and unpolished nations, who, in the revolution of a few ages, became not less celebrated for their steady and dis- ciplined heroism in the field, than for the sagacity of their measures in the cabinet. Under the banners of David, a prince of a truly heroic mind, the tribes of Israel often put to flight vast numbers of their enemies^ and became a terror to all the circumjacent kingdoms. — Paxton. Ver. 34. And David said unto Saul, Thy servant kept his father's sheep, and there came a lion and a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock. Although the lion is the terror of the forest, and has been known to scatter destruction over the fairest regions of the East ; yet he is often compelled to yield to the superior prowess or address of man. When Samson, the champion of Israel, went down to Timnath, a city belonging to the tribe of Dan, situated in the valley of Sorek, so renowned for the excellence of its vines, a young lion roared against him ; " and the spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him, and he rent him as he would have rent a kid, and he had nothing in his hand." In this > instance, the lion was only giving the usual signal for the attack which he meditated, and consequently his kindling passions had not reached their highest excitement; but it appears from the authentic page of history, that the prey is sometimes rescued from his devouring jaws, when his fury is excited to the highest degree of intensity. To this circumstance, the prophet Amos refers, in that part of his prophecy where he de- scribes the extreme difficulty with which a few of the meaner and poorer inhabitants of Samaria, should escape from the power of their enemies: " Thus saith the Lord, as the shepherd taketh out of the mouth of the lion, two legs or a piece of an ear, so shall the children of Israel be taken out that dwell in Samaria." The daring intrepidity, the admirable presence of mind, and great strength of Da- vid, when he tended his father's flocks in the wilderness, were subjected to a severe trial, by the attack of a lion, which he thus relates to Saul : " Thy servant kept his fa- ther's sheep; and there came a lion and a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock; and I went out after him, and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth ; and when he rose against me, I caught him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him : thy servant slew both the lion and the bear." In these words, the youthful shepherd indisputably details the particulars of two exploits performed on different occa- sions ; for the lion and the bear never hunt in company. Like the greater part of other wild beasts, they prowl alone, rejecting the society of even one of their own species. " It is not therefore to be supposed, they will associate on such occasions with other animals. A careless reader might imagine that David encountered them both at the same time, and Castalio has been so inconsiderate as to make the text speak this language; for he translates it, There came a lion, una cum, together or in company with a bear. But are We to suppose, that these two animals, contrary tw Chap. 17. I SAMUEL. 163 their nature, entered into partnership on this occasion, and that to seize upon one poor lamb, and divide it between theml Or if no miracle was wrought in the case, but the victory was achieved by the natural strength and reso- ld liition of David, aided by the good providence of God, how many hands must we suppose him to have had, in order at once to seize two such animals, to smite them both, and to rescue the lamb" from their jaws 1 How was it possible for a single youth, for at that time he was not more than twenty years of age, to encounter with success two of the strongest and fiercest beasts that range the forest 1 Or if David vanquished these terrible depredators, not by his own courage and address, but by the miraculous assistance of heaven, still the difficulty is not removed ; for he could have no warrant from such a victory to encounter Goliath. It became him to enter the lists with the giant, depending upon the ordinary assistance of God, and the usual vigour of his own arm, not upon a miracle, which God had not promised. To avoid these inconveniences, it is necessary to admit, that David mentions two different rencounters, one with a lion, and another with a bear; in both which he succeeded in rescuing the prey from the devourer. This hypothesis has the advantage of being perfectly consistent with the text; for the particle rendered and, is often dis- junctive, and ought to be translated or. Thus, in the law of the passover, it is commanded, " Ye shall take it out from the sheep or from the goats ;" and in the precept for securing reverence to parents, " He that smiteth his father or his mother, shall surely be put to death ;" " and he that curseth his father or his mother, shall surely be put to death;" in all which, the connecting particle is the same. But by the law of Moses, only one lamb, or one kid, was to be taken for each household, not two; and if a person smote, or cursed one of his parents, he was guilty of death ; in these cases, therefore, the particle is properly rendered or ; and by consequence, may be so rendered in the text under consideration. The words of David would then run thus: There came a lion or a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock. This version is also required by the verb, which, instead of being in the plural, as the conjunctive particle demands, is in the singular number, which clear- ly indicates a disjunctive sense. This is confirmed by the next verse, in which David speaks of them in the singular number : " And I went out after him, and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth ; and when he rose against me, I caught him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him." If these two animals had been in company, he could with no propriety have spoken of them in tnis man- ner. The meaning therefore is, there came a lion on one occasion, and on another a bear, and took each a lamb out of the flock ; and he went out against each of them and res- cued the lamb from his mouth. Thus, by the favour of Providence, did the future shepherd of Israel, on two dif- ferent occasions, slay both the lion and the bear. Nor ought this to be reckoned an achievement beyond the power of a single combatant ; for an ancient poet only ad- mits it to be extremely dangerous, and almost beyond the powers of man, to deliver the prey from the mouth of a hungry lion, but does not venture to pronounce it imprac- ticable : — "Esurienti leoni ex ore exculpere praedam." Nor is any mistake imputable to David, when he speaks of seizing a bear by the beard ; for the original term sometimes denotes the chin ; as in this precept of the ceremonial law : " If a man or woman have a plague upon the head or beard; then the priest shall see the plague." He, therefore, seized the l.on by his beard, and the bear, that was not favoured with this "ornament, by the chin ; which entirely removes the difficulty. — Paxton. Ver. 38. And Saul armed David with his ar- mour, and he put a helmet of brass upon his head ; also he armed him with a coat of mail. A principal piece of defensive armour entitled to our no- tice, is the nelmet, which protected the head. This has been used from the remotest ages by almost every nation of a martial spirit. The champion of the Philistines had a helmet of brass upon his head, as had also the king of Is- rael, who commanded the armies of the living God. This martial cap was also worn by the Persians and Ethiopians in the day of battle. The Grecian helmets were very often made of the skins of beasts ; but the helmet of the Jewish warrior seems to have been uniformly made of brass or iron ; and to this sort of casque only, the sacred writer seems to refer. In allusion to this piece of defensive ar- mour, Paul directs the believer to put on for a helmet the hope of salvation, which secures the head in every con- test, till through him that loved him, he gain a complete victory over all his enemies. That well-grounded hope of eternal life, which is attended with ineffable satisfaction, and never disappoints the soul, like a helmet of brass shall guard it against fear and danger, enable it patiently to en- dure every hardship, and fortify it against the most furious and threatening attacks of Satan and all his confederates. Such adversaries, this solid hope is not less calculated to strike with dismay, than was the helmet of an ancient war- rior in the day of battle his mortal foes, by its dazzling brightness, its horrific devices of Gorgons and Chimeras, and its nodding plumes which overlooked the dreadful cone. — Paxton. Ver. 43. And the Philistine said unto David, Am, I a dog, that thou comest to me with staves ? And the Philistine cursed David by his gods. Men of high caste will not strike those who are of low caste with the hand, because the touch would defile them : they therefore beat'them with a stick or some other weapon. Hence to offer to strike any person with a stick is very provoking, and the person so struck will ask, " Am I a dog 1" When a man wishes to make another angry, he pretends to be looking for a stick, which will produce a similar question and feeling. Sometimes, however, they only repeat the proverb, " Take up a stick, and the dog will run off. As did the Philistines, so do these people curse each other by their gods. The imprecations are generally of such a kind as it would be improper to repeat. The ex- tremes of filthiness, of sin and hell, are put under contribu- tion, to furnish epithets and allusions for their execrations. — Roberts. Ver. 44. And the Philistine said to David, Come to me, and I will give thy flesh unto the fowls of the air, and to the beasts of the field. The rhodomontade of Goliath is still the favourite way of terrifying an enemy. " Begone, or I will give thy flesh to the jackals." " The crows shall soon have thy carcass." "Yes, the teeth of the dogs shall soon have hold of thee." " The eagles are ready."— Roberts. Ver. 51. Therefore David ran, and stood upon the Philistine, and took his sword, and drew it out of the sheath thereof, and slew him, and cut off his head therewith. And when the Philis- tines saw their champion was dead, they fled. The ancient Grecians frequently committed their cause to the issue of a single combat, and decided their quarrels by two or more champions on each side ; and their kings and great commanders were so eager in the pursuit of glory, and so tender of the lives of their subjects, that they frequently sent challenges to their rivals, to end the quar- rel by a single encounter, that by the death of one of them, the effusion of more blood might be prevented. Ancient history contains many remarkable instances of such com- bats; Xanthus, king of BcEotia, challenged the king of Attica, to terminate the dangerous war in which their states were engaged in this way, and lost his life >n the contest; and Pittacus, the famous Mitylenian, hilled Phryno the Athenian general, in a single combat. This custom was not unknown in Palestine and other tastern countries, for the champion of the Philistines challenged the armies of Israel, to give him a man to fight with him ; and when he fell by the valour of David, his countrymen, struck with dismay, immediately deserted their standards, and endeavoured to save themselves by flight' The chal- lenge given on those occasions, was generally couched in the most insolent language, and delivered with a very con- temptuous air. Thus, Homer makes one chief address another in these terms : " Bold as thou art, too prodigal of 164 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 18. ife, approach and enter the dark gates of death," But his is a tame spiritless defiance, compared with the proud ind insulting terms which Goliath addressed to his young and inexperienced antagonist: " Come to me, and I will give thy flesh to the fowls of the air and the beasts of the field;" or the bold and manly, but devout reply of the youthful warrior : " Thou comest to me with a sword, and w'th a spear, and with a shield, but I come to thee in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied. This day will the Lord deliver thee into my hand, and I will smite thee, and take thy head from thee, and I will give the carcasses of the hosts of the Philistines this day unto the fowls of the air, and to the wild beasts of the earth; that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel." The Philistines no sooner saw their champion fallen, and his head severed from his body, than, seized with a panic fear, they fled, and the armies of Israel pursued with loud acclamations. Another instance of panic which struck the army of the Philistines, a short time before, when Jonathan and his armour-bearer fell upon their garrison and put them to flight, is described in these terms : " And there was trembling in the host, in the field, and among all the people; the garrison and the spoilers, they a/so trembled ; and the earth quaked ; so it was a very great trembling." In the Hebrew, it is a trem- ^Ung of God ; that is, a fear which God sent upon them, and consequently which the strongest mind could not reason down, nor the firmest heart resist. This fear, the Greeks and other heathen nations called a panic ; because Pan, one of their gods, was believed to be the author of it. Bacchus, in his Indian expedition, led his army into some defiles, where he was surrounded by his enemies, and re- duced to the last extremity. By the advice of Pan, his lieutenant-general, he made his army give a sudden shout, which struck the enemy with so great astonishment and terror, that they fled with the utmost precipitation. Hence, it was ever afterward called a panic, and supposed to come directly from heaven. It is thus expressed by Pindar : " When men are struck with divine terrors, even the chil- dren of the gods betake themselves to flight." The flight of the Syrians, in the reign of Jehoram, king of Israel, was produced by a panic, which so completely unmanned them, that, says the sacred historian, " all the way was full of garments and vessels, which the Syrians had cast away in their haste." The flight of Saladin's army, which was defeated by Baldwin IV. near Gaza, in the lime of the crusades, was marked with similar circum- stances of consternation and terror. To flee with greater expedition, they threw away their arms and clothes, their coats of mail, their greaves, and other pieces of armour, and abandoned their bagg^age, and fled from their pursuers, almost in a state of complete nudity. — Paxton. Ver. 55. And when Saul saw David go forth against the Philistine, he said unto Abner, the captain of the host, Abner, whose son is this youth ? And Abner said, As thy soul liveth, O king, I cannot tell. It is a favourite way of addressing a person by saying, " You are the son of such a person," or, " Is he not the son of such a man V How Saul could have forgotten David, is im.possible to account for. "When a person has to ask a number of questions, though he know well the name, of the individual he has to address, he often begins by asking, *' Whose son are you 1" Many people never go by their proper name : they are known by the son of such a person, as Nellindderin Maggan, i. e. the son of Nellindder. — Rob- erts. Ver. 57. And as David returned from the slaugh- ter of the Philistine, Abner took him, and brought him before Saul, with the head of the Philistine in his hand. On some occasions the victor cut off the head of his ene- my, and carried it in triumph on the point of a spear, and presented it, if a person of inferior rank, to his prince or the commander-in-chief. Barbarossa, the dey of Algiers, returned in triumph from the conquest of the kingdom of Cucco, with the head of the king, who had lost his life in the contest, carried before him on a lance. Mr. Harmer thinks it probable that the Philistines cut off" the head of Saul, whom they found among the slain, on Gilboa, to car- ry it in triumph on the point of a spear to their principal city, according to the custom of those times ; and that Da- vid, in a preceding war, severed the head of Goliath from his body, for the purpose of presenting it to Saul, in the same manner, on the point of a lance. The words of the inspired historian do not determine the mode in which it was presented ; we must therefore endeavour to form oup opinion from the general custom of the East. The words of the record are : " And as David returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, Abner took him and brought him before Saul, with the head of the Philistine in his hand." It is scarcely to be supposed that the youthful war- rior was introduced with the sword in the one hand, and the head of his enemy in the other, like one of our execu- tioners holding up the head of a traitor ; it is more reason- able to imagine, says Mr. Harmer, that he appeared in a more graceful and warlike attitude, bearing on the point of a lance the head of his adversary. But it must be con fessed that the other idea, after all that respectable writer has said, is more naturally suggested by the words of the inspired historian. It is a common practice in Turkey to cut ofif the heads of enemies slain in battle, and lay them in heaps before the residence of their emperor, or his princi- pal oflScers. In Persia Mr. Hanway saw a pyramid of human heads at the entrance of Astrabad. They were . the heads of Persians who had rebelled against their sov- ereign. This barbarous custom may be traced up to a very remote antiquity ; and it was probably not seldom re- duced to practice in the various governments of Asia. When Jehu conspired against Ahab, he commanded the heads of his master's children, seventy in number, to be cut ofif, and brought in baskets to Jezreel, and " laid in two heaps at the entering in of the gate until the morning." The renowned Xenophon says, in his Anabasis, that the same custom was practised by the Chalybes ; and Herod- otus makes the same remark in relation to the Scythians. — Paxton. CHAPTER XVIII. Ver. 4. And Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments, even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle. See on Est. 6. 7, 8. An ancient mode of ratifying an engagement, was by presenting the party with some article of their own dress; and if they were warriors, by exchanging their arms. The greatest honour which a king of Persia can bestow upon a subject, is to cause himself to be disrobed, and his habit given to the favoured individual. The cus- tom was probably derived from the Jews ; for when Jona- than made his covenant with David, " he stripped himself of the robe that was upon him, and gave it to David, and his garments ; even to his sword, and to his bow, and to his girdle." — In a similar way, Julus, and the other Trojan chiefs, confirmed their solenin engagements to Nisus and Euryalus : " Thus weeping over him, he speaks ; at the same time divests his shoulders of his gilded sword — On Nisus Mnestheus bestows the skin and spoil of a grim shaggy lion ; trusty Alethes exchanges with him his hel- met." This instance proves, that among the ancients, to part with one's girdle was a token of the greatest confi- dence and aflfection ; in some cases it was considered as an act of adoption. The savage tribes of North America, that are certainly of Asiatic origin, ratify their covenants and leagues in the same way ; in token of perfect recon- ciliation, they present a belt of wampum. — Paxton. Ver. 6. And it came to pass, as they came, when David Avas returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, that the women came out of all the cities of Israel, singing and dancing, to meet king Saul, with tabrets, with joy, and with in- struments of music. Has a long absent son returned, is a person coming who has performed some great exploit, are tne bride and bride* Chap. 19. 1 SAMUEL. 161 groom with their attendants expected ; then, those in the house go forth with tabrets and pipes to meet them, and greet them, and conduct them on the way. When a great man is expected, the people of the village always send the tabrets and pipes to meet him. It is amusing to see with what earnestness and vehemence they blow their instru- ments, or beat their tom-toms, and stamp along the load. — Roberts. The dancing and playing on instruments of music, be- fore persons of distinction, when they pass near the dwell- ing-places of such as are engaged in country business, still continue in the East. When the Baron de Tott was sent by the French government, to inspect the factories of that na- tion in the Levant, having proceeded from Egypt to the maritime cities of Syria, he went from them to Aleppo, and returnmg from thence to Alexandretta, in order to visit Cyprus, and some other places of which he has given an account in his memoirs, he tells us, that between Aleppo and Alexandretta, he saw, on a sudden, the troop the gov- ernor of Aleppo had sent with him, to escort him, turn back and ride towards him. " The commander of the de- tachment then showed me the tents of the Turcomen, pitched on the banks of the lake, near which we were to pass. It was no easy task to keep my company in good spirits, within sight of six or seven thousand Asiatics, whose peaceable intentions were at least doubtful." "I took care to cover my escort with my small troop of Euro- peans ; and we continued to march on, in this order, which nad no very hostile appearance, when we perceived a mo- tion in the enemy's camp, from which several of the Tur- comen advanced to meet us, and I soon had the musicians of the different hordes, playing and dancing before me all thef^ime we were passing by the side of their camp." The translation does not determine, whether these musicians were of the male or female sex; but I doubt not but that it would appear, on consulting the original French, that they were women that played and danced before M. de Tott, the French inspector, while passing along' the side of that large encampment. We cannot after this wonder at the account of the sacred historian, that when Saul and David were returning from the slaughter of Goliath, the great hero of the Philistines, the ii-omen came out of all the cities of Israel, singing and dancing to meet King Saul, with tabrets, with joy, and with instruments of music. That is, as I ap- prehend, the women of the several villages of Israel near which he passed, in returning to his settled abode, univer- sally paid him the honour of singing and playing before him for some considerable way, while he passed along in the road near to them. All Israel were engaged in rural em- ployments, as Veil as these Turcomen. De Tott ascribes the honours paid him by these Asiatics to the hope of a re- ward : " I took leave of them, by presenting them with that reward, the hope of which had brought them to attend us, and with which they were very civil to go away contented." I would remark, that the eastern princes sometimes cause money to be scattered in processions on joyful occasions, according to this very writer ; however, the satisfaction that succeeded great terror, upon the death of Goliath, was enough to engage the Israelitish women universally to ppy this honour to their own king, and an heroic youth of their own nation, who had been the instrument of effecting such a great salvation for their country, without any lucrative considerations whatever.— Harmer. When leaving the city of Lattakoo, to visit the king of the Matslaroos, on the confines of the great southern Za- hara desert, a party of men was returning from a distant exped ition, afler an absence of several months. The news of their approach had reached the town, and the women were hastening to meet them. On joining the party, they marched at their head, clapping their hands, and singing with all their might, till they arrived at their homes in the town. On witnessing this scene, my mind was carried back three thousand years, to the very occurrence recorded in the above passage. The occasion, no doubt, was a joy- ful one to the females, some of whom had their husbands, and others their fathers and brothers, in the expedition, for whose safety they were interested, and had been anxiously concerned. The same must have been the case with re- spect to the Israelitish women, while Saul's army were re- turning victorious from the Philistine war. — African Light. Ver. 25. And Saul said. Thus shall ye say to Da- vid, The kingf desireth not any dowry, but a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines. In the remote ages of antiquity, women were literally purchased by their husbands; and the presents made to their parents or other relations were called their dowry. The practice still continues in the country of Shechem ; for when a young Arab wishes to marry, he must purchase his wife; and for this reason, fathers, among the Arabs, are never more happy than when they have many daugh- ters. They are reckoned the principal riches of a touse. An Arabian suiter will offer fifty sheep, six camels, cr * dozen of cows ; if he be not rich enough to make such of- fers, he proposes to give a mare or a colt; considering in the offer, the merit of the young woman, the rank of her family, and his own circumstances. In the primitive times of Greece, a well-educated lady was valued at four oxen. When they are agreed on both sides, the contract is drawn up by him that acts as cadi or judge among these Arabs. In some parts of the East, a measure of corn is formally mentioned in contracts for their concubines, or temporary wives, besides the sum of money which is stipu- lated by way of dowry. This custom is probably as an- cient as concubinage, with which it is connected ; and if so, it will perhaps account for the prophet Hosea's purchasing a wife of this kind, for fifteen pieces of silver, and for a homer of barley, and a half homer of barley. When the intended husband was not able to give a dowry, he offered an equivalent. The patriarch Jacob, who came to Laban with only his staff, offered lo serve him seven years for Rachel ; a proposal which Laban accepted. This custom has descended to modern times; for in Cabul, the young men who are unable to advance the required dowry, " live with their future father-in-law and earn their bride by their services, without ever seeing the object of their \Vishes." Saul, instead of a dowry, required David to bring him a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, under the pretence of avenging himself of his enemies. This custom has pre- vailed in latter times ; for in some countries they give their daughters in marriage to the valiant men, or those whoN should bring them so many heads of the people with whom they happen to be at war. It is recorded of a nation in Caramania, that no man among them was permitted to marry, till he had first brought the head of an enemy to the king. Aristotle admits, that the ancient Grecians were ac- customed to buy their wives ; but they no sooner began to lay aside their barbarous manners, than this disgusting practice ceased, and the custom of giving portions to their sons-in-law, was substituted in its place. The Romans also, in the first ages of their history, purchased their wives ; but afterward, they required the wife to bring a portion to the husband, that he might be able to bear the charges of the matrimonial state more easily. — Paxton. CHAPTER XIX. Ver. 12. So Michal let David down through a window; and he went, and fled; and escaped. 13. And Michal took an image, and laid it m the bed, and put a pillow of goats' hair for his bolster, and covered iMvith a cloth. 14. And when Saul sent messengers to take David, she said, He is sick. 15. And Saul sent the mes- sengers again to see David, saying, Bring him up to me in the bed, that I may s.ay him 16. And when the messengers were come in behold, there was an image in the bed, with a pillow of goats' hair for his bolster. 17. And Saul said unto Michal, Why hast thou deceived me so, and sent away mine enemy, that he is escaped ? And. Michal answered Saul, He said unto me, Let me go ; why should I kill thee ? An accident led me into a train of thought, relating to that piece of furniture the Romans called a canopeum, and 166 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 20,21, which is said to denote a canopy or pavilion made of net- work, which hung about beds, and was designed to keep away gnats, which are someiimes insupportably trouble- some to the more delicate. I recollected that it is at this time used in the East ; and that if it may be supposed to have obtained so early there as the time of King Saul, it may very happily illustrate the above passage of scripture, of which our commentators have given a very unsatisfac- tory account. I should suppose a canopeum, or guard against gnats, is what is meant by the word translated a pillow of goals' hair, f cannot conceive what deception could arise from the pillow's being stutfed with goats' nair, or for making a truss of goats' hair serve for a pillow. This last must have been, on the contrary, very disagreeable to a sick man ; especially one who, having married a princess, must be supposed to have been in possession of agreeable ac- commodations of life, such at least as were used at that time, und in that country. A piece of fine net-work to guard L.o from gnats, and other troublesome insects, that might ■irtfnib the repose of a sick man, was extremely natural, if tiiC use of them was as early as the days of Saul. It is in one place translated a thick cloth, in another, a sieve ; now a cloth of a nature fit to use for a sieve, is just such a thing as I am supposing, a fine net-work or gauze like cloth. Here it is translated a pillow, but for no other reason, but because it appeared to be something relating to the head ; but a canopeum relates to the head as well as a pillow, laeing a canopy Suspended over the whole bed, or at least so far as to surround the head, and such upper part of the body as might be uncovered. Modern canopies of this nature may be of other materials : they may be of silk or thread, but goats' hair was in great use in those earlier ages, and may be imagined to have been put to this use in those times, as our modern sieves still continue frequently to be made of the hair of animals. After this preparatory remark, I would produce a proof, that this kind of defence against gnats is used in the East. '• Among the hurtful animals that Egypt produces," says Maillet,'" those that we call gnats ought not to be forgotten. If their size prevents all apprehensions of dangerous acci- dents from them, their multitudes make them insupportable. The Nile water, which remains in the canals and the lakes, into which it makes its way every year, produces such a prodigious quantity of these insects, that the air is often darkened by them. The nighttime is that in which people are most exposed to receive punctures from them ; and it is with a view to guard themselves from them, that they sleep so much here on the tops of their houses, which are flat-roofed. These terraces are paved with square flat stones, very thin ; and as in this country, they have no ap- prehensions from rain or fogs, they are wont to place their beds on these roofs every night, in order to enjoy their re- pose more undisturbedly and coolly, than they could any- where else. Gnats seldom rise so high in the air. The agitation of the air at that height is too much for them ; they cannot bear it. However, for greater precaution, persons of any thing of rank never fail to have a tent set up in these terraces, in the midst of which is suspended a pavilion of fine linen, or of gauze, which falls down to the ground, and encloses the mattress. Under the shelter of this pavilion, ^hichrthe people of the country call na- 'Mousie, from the word namous, which in their language signifies Jly, or gnat, people are secured against these in- sects, not only on the terraces, but everywhere else. If they were to make use of them in Europe, I do not doubt but that people that sleep in the daytime, and above all the sick, would find the advantage of them ; for it must be acknowledged, that in summer-time those small insects, which introduce themselves into all places, are insupporta- ble to people that would take their repose, and much more so to those that are ill." No curious carved statue, which indeed one can hardly imagine was to be found in the house of David, was necessary; any thing formed in a tolerable resemblance of the body of a man was sufficient for this deception, covered over with the coverlet belonging to the mattress on which it was laid, and where the bead should have been placed, being covered all over with a pavijion of goats' hair, through which the eye could not penetrate. A second visit, with a more exact scrutiny, .iiscovered the artifice. There is another passage in which the word occurs, and in the same sense. It is in the account the historian gives us of the real cause of the death of Benhadad, the king of Syria, 2 Kings viii. 15 ; " And it came to pass on the mor- row, that he took a thick cloth, and dipped it in water, and spread it over his face, so that he died : and Hazael reigned in his stead." If Hazael stifled him, why all this parade % the drawing the pillow from under his head, and clapping it over his mouth, would have been sufficient. Why the procuring a thick cloth, according to our translators '] why the dipping it in water 1 It is the same word (I'-ns kebeer) with that in Samuel, and, it is reasonable therefore to sup- pose, means the same thing, a gnat pavilion. The dipping it in water may well be supposed to be under the pretence of coolness and refreshment. So Pitts tells us, that the people of Mecca " do usually sleep on the tops of the houses for the air, or in the streets before their doors. Some lay the small bedding they have on a thin mat on the ground ; others have a slight frame, made much like drink-stalls, ou which we place barrels, standing on four legs, corded with palm cordage, on which they put their bedding. Before they bring out their bedding, they sweep the streets, and water them. As for my own part, I usually lay open with- out any bed-covering, on the top of the house ; only I took a linen cloth, dipped in the water, and after I had v/rung it, covered myself with it in the night : and when I awoke, if I should find it dry, then I would wet it again -, and thus I did two or three times in a night." In like manner, Niebuhr tells us, in his description of Arabia, that " as ii is excessively hot, in the summer-time, on the eastern shore of the Persian gulf, and they do not find that the dew there is unwholesome, they sleep commonly in the open air." He goes on, "in the island of Charedsj, I never enjoyed my repose better than when the dew moistei^i my bed in the night." Hazael then had a fair pretence to oflfer to moisten the gnat pavilion, if Benhadad did not himself desire it, on the account of his extreme heat, which might prove the occasion of his death, while the dis- temper itself was not mortal. Whether the moisture of that piece of furniture proved at that time destructive from the nature of the disease, or whether Hazael stifled him with it, we are not told by the historian, and therefore cannot pretend absolutely to determine. Conjecture is not likely to be very favourable to Hazael. — Harmer. CHAPTER XX. Ver. 30. Then Saul's anger was kindled against Jonathan, and he said unto him, Thou son ot the perverse rebellious woman, do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother's nakedness. In the East, when they are angry with a person, they abuse and vilify his parents. Saul thought of nothing bu, venting his anger against Jonathan, nor had any design to reproach his wife personally ; the mention of her was only a vehicle by which, according to oriental modes, he was to convey his resentment against Jonathan into the minds of those about him. — Harmer. CHAPTER XXI. Ver. 9. And the priest said, The sw.ord of Goliath the Philistine, whom thou slewest in the valley of Elah, behold, it is here, wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod : if thou wilt take that, take it ; for there is no other save that here. And David said. There is none like that ; give it me. To the jewels of silver and gold, which the Hebrew soldier was accustomed to bring as a free-will 6flering into the treasury of his God, must be added the armour ot some illustrious foe, which, in gratitude for his preserva- tion, he suspended in the sanctuary. The sword of Go- liath was wrapped up in a cloth, and deposited behind the ephod ; and in a succeeding war, the Philistines proving victorious, took their revenge by depositing the armour of Saul in the temple of Ashtaroth. The custom of dedica- ting to the gods the spoils of a conquered enemy, and placing them in their temples as trophies of victory and testimonies of gratitude, is verv ancient, and universally received in Asia and Greece. Hector promises to dedicate his enemy's Chap. 22, 23. 1 SAMUEL. 167 armour in the temple of Apollo, if he would grant him the victory : " But if I shall prove victorious, and Apollo vouchsafe me the glory to strip off his armour, and carry it to sacred Trov, then will I suspend it in the temple of the far-darting Apollo." Virgil alludes to this custom in his description of the temple, where Latinus gives audi- ence to the ambassadors of -£neas : " Multaque prseterea sacris in postibus arma," &c. JSn. lib. vii. 1. 183. " Besides, on the sacred doorposts, many arms, captive chariots, and crooked cimeters are suspended, helmets, crested plumes, and massy bars of gates, and darts, and shields, and beaks torn from ships." Nor was it the cus- tom only to dedicate to heaven the weapons taken from an enemy; when the soldier retired from the tumults of war to the bosom of his family, he frequently hung up his own arms in the temple, as a grateful acknowledgment of the protection he had received, and the victories he had won. In this custom, the Greeks and Romans imitated the Asiatic nations, and particularly the Hebrews ; for when David resigned the command of his armies to his generals, he laid up his arms in the tabernacle, where they continued for several ages ; and there is reason to believe his conduct in this respect, was followed by many of his companions in arms. When Joash, one of his descendants, was crowned, Jehoiada the high-priest, imder whose care he had been educated, delivered to the captains of hundreds, spears, and bucklers, and shields, that had been King David's, which were in the house of God. — P.4Xton. CHAPTER XXII. Ver. 6. When Saul heard that David was dis- covered, and the men that were with him, (now Saul abode in Gibeah under a tree in Ramah, having his spear in his hand, and all his ser- vants were standing about him.) Though mean people in travelling might make use of trees for shelter from the heat, we may perhaps think it almost incredible that kings should not imagine that either proper houses would be marked out for their reception ; or if that could not be convenientlv done in some of their routes, that at least they would have tents carried along with them, as persons of more than ordinary rank and condition are supposed by Dr. Shaw now to do. For these reasons we may possibly have been extremely surprised at that passage concerning Saul, 1 Sam. xxii. 6, Now Swul aiode in Gibeah, under a tree in Ramah, or, according to the margin, under a grove in a high place, having his spear in his hand, and all his servants were standing about him. Yet strange as this may appear to us, it is natural enough according to the present customs of the East, where we know the solemnity and awfulness of superiority is kept up as high as ever. Thus when Dr. Pococke was travelling in the company of the governor of Faiume, who was treated with great respect as he passed along, they passed one night, he tells us, in a grove of palm-trees. The governor might, no doubt, had he pleased, have lodged in some village; but he rather chose a place which we think very odd for a person of figure. The position of Saul, Which was on a high place according to the margin, reminds me of another passage of this author, where he gi-'-es us an account of the going out of the Caya, or lieu- tenant of the governor of Meloui, on a sort of Arab expe- dition, towards a place where there was an ancient temple, attended by many people with kettledrums and other music : the doctor visited that temple, and upon his return from it went to the caya, he says, "whose carpets and cushions were laid on a height, on which he sat with the standard by him, which is carried before him when he goes out in this manner, I sat down with him, and coffee was brought; the sadar himself, came after as incognito." Saul seems, by the description given, as well as by the fol- lowing part of the history, to have been pursuing after David, and stopping, to have placed himself, according to the present oriental mode, in the posture of chief Whether the spear in his hand, or at his hand, as it might be trans- lated according to Noldius, and as appears by the use of that prefix in Ezek, x. 15, was the same thing to Saul's I, people that the standard was to those of the caya, I know 1 not; if it was, there is a third thing in this text illustrated by the dot. tor's accounts, the stopping under a tree or grove; the stopping on a high place; and the sacred historian's remark, that he had his spear by him. It is certain, that when a long pike is carried before a company of Arabs, it is a mark that an Arab sheik, or prince, is there, which Eike is carried before him ; and when he alights, and the orses are fastened, the pike is fixed, as appears by a story in Norden. — Harmer. Ver. 18. And the king said to Doeg, Turn thou, and fall upon the priests. And Doeg the Edomite turned, and he fell upon the priests, and slew on that day fourscore and five persons that did wear a linen ephod. In ancient times, persons of the highest rank and station were employed to execute the sentence of the law. The) had not then, as we have at present, public executioners ; but the prince laid his commands on any of his courtiers whom he chose, and probably selected the person for whom he had the greatest favour. Gideon commanded Jether, his eldest son, to execute his sentence on the kings of Midian : the king of Israel ordered the footmen who stood around him, and were probably a chosen body of soldiers for the defence of his person, to put to death the priests of the Lord ; and when they refused, Doeg, an Edomite, one of his principal officers. Long after the days of Saul, the reigning monarch commanded Beniah, the chief captain of his armies, to perform that duty. Sometimes the chief magistrate executed the sentence of the law with his own hands; for when Jether shrunk from the duty which his father required, Gideon, at that time the supreme magis- trate in Israel, did not hesitate to do it himself In these times such a command would be reckoned equally barba- rous and unbecoming; but the ideas which were entertained in those primitive ages of honour and propriety, were in many respects extremely different from ours. In Homer, the exasperated Ulysses commanded his son Telemachu'' to put to death the suiters of Penelope, which was imme- diately done. The custom of employing persons of high rank to execute the sentence of the law, is still retained in the principality of Senaar, where the public executioner is one of the principal nobility ; and, by virtue of his office, resides in the royal palace. — Paxton, CHAPTER XXin. Ver. 16. And Jonathan Saul's son arose, and went to David into the wood, and strengthened his hand in God. A passage in the Travels of Pietro della Valle, which bears a strong resemblance to this part of David's history, considerably illustrates it Speaking of his passing through a forest or wood in Mazanderan, a province of Persia, into which they entered on the 11th of February, and com- plaining of the moisture and heaviness of the roads there, he tells us, " We did at length master them, but with so much, difficulty that we could not get forward above two leagues that day, and night overtook us before we got through the forest. We endeavoured to find some place of retreat in different parts, to which the barking of dogs, or noise made by other animals, seemed to guide us. But at last, finding no inhabited place near us, we passed the night in the same forest, among the trees, under which we made a kind of intrenchment with our baggage, in a place where we found many leaves that had fallen from the trees. These served us for a carpet and for bedding both, without any other tent than the branches of the great trees there, through which the moonshine reached us, and made a kind of pavilion of cloth of silver. There was no want of wood for the making a great fire, any more than of pro- visions for supper, which we sent for from the nearest village in the forest, seated by the highway-side, where, after some contest with the people, of a savage and sus- picious temper, who were ready to come to blows with my messengers, without knowing any reason why they should; they, after coming to a right understanding with us, be- came very civil, would have lodged us, and made us presents : but on our refusal on account of the distance of the way, the chief person of the town, with other principal inhabitants, came of their own accord to our camp, laden 168 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 23—25: with good meat, and other provisions, and spent the night with us with great gayety. They even brought us a coun- try musician, who regaled us during supper, and all night ,ong, with certain forest songs, in the language of the country, that is, of Mazanderan, where a coarse kind of Persian is spoken, sung to the sound of a miserable violin, which was sufficiently tiresome." — Harmes. Ver. 19. Then came up the Ziphites to Saul to Gibeah, saying, Doth not David hide himself with us in strongholds in the wood, in the hill of Hachilah, which is on the south of Jeshimon? The margin has, for south, "on the right hand." " The Hebrews express the east, west, north, and south, by words which signify before, behind, left, and right, according to the situation of a man with his face turned towards the south." In the same way do the Hindoos speak on this subject, the north is shown by the left, the south by the right hand, the face being considered to be towards the east. When the situation of any thing is spoken of, it is always mentioned in connexion with the cardinal points. Often, when people wish to give intelligence respecting any thing, they begin by asking a question which conveys the inform- ation required. Thus the situation of poor David was described by asking a question. " Have not the elephants been ravaging the fields of Tamban last night T' is a question asked when such a circumstance has taken place. — Roberts. Ver. 29. And David went up from thence, and dwelt in strongholds at En-gedi. The village of Engedi, situated in the neighbourhood of Jericho, derives its name from the Hebrew word (r*;) Ain, a fountain, and ("ni) a kid. It is suggested by the situation among lofty rocks, which, overhanging the valleys, seem to threaten the traveller with immediate destruction. A fountain of pure water rises near the summit, which the inhabitants call Engedi, the fountain of the goat, because it is hardly accessible to any other creature. — Paxton. CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 8. And when Saul looked behind him, Da- vid stooped with his face to the earth, and bowed himself " Some time after this, the ambassador had his public audience, when we saw the king in great splendour : he was decked in all his jewels, with his crown on his head, his bazubends or armlets on his arms, seated on his throne. We approached him, bowing after our own manner ; but the Persians bowed as David did to Saul, who stooped with his face to the earth, and bowed himself. 1 Sam. xxiv. 8. That is, not touching the earth with the face, but bowing with their bodies at right angles, the hands placed on the knees, and the legs somewhat asunder. It is only on remarkable occasions that the prostration of the Rouee Zemeen, the face to the earth, is made, which must be the falling upon the face to the earth, and worshipping as Joshua did." — Morier. Ver. 12. The Lord judge between me and thee, and the Lord avenge me of thee : but my hand shall not be upon thee. The attitudes and expression of respect, which the rules of good-breeding require from the Oriental, are far more diversified and servile than ours ; yet he uses a freedom with his equals, and even with persons of superior condi- tion, which we are uniformly taught to regard as im- proper. It is reckoned among us a sure mark of vulgarity, in any person to mention his own name before that of his equal ; and an instance of great arrogance to name himself before hi? superior ; but in the East, it is quite customary for the speaker to name himself first. This was also the habitual practice in Israel, and quite consistent with their notions of good-breeding : for David, who had been long at the court of Saul, and could be no stranger to the rules of ffood manners, addressed his sovereiern in these words: " The Lord judge between me and thee ;" and this at a time too, when he treated that prince with great reverence; for " he stooped with his face to the earth, and bowed himself immediately before. In the same manner, Ephron the Hittite replied to the patriarch Abraham, who was at least his equal, more probably his superior : " My lord, hearken unto me ; the land is worth four hundred shekels of silver ; what is that between me and thee T* Hence David was guilty of no rudeness to Saul, in naming hiriiself first ; his conduct was quite agreeable to the modern ceremonial of eastern courts, at least to that of Persia, which seems to have been established soon after the flood. — Paxton. Ver. 14. After whom is the king of Israel come out ? after whom dost thou pursue ? after a dead dog, after a flea ? It is highly contemptible and provoking to compare a man to a dead dog. Has a servant offended his master; he will say, " Stand there and be like a dead dog to me." Does a creditor press much for his money ; the debtor will say, " Bring your bond, and then he is a dead dog to me." " I care as much for that fellow as for a dead dog." " I w^ll tell you what that fellow is worth ; a dead dog !" — RoBERf s. Ver. 16. And it came to pass, when David had made an end of speaking these words unto Saul, that Saul said, Is this thy voice, my son David 1 And Saul lifted up his voice and wept. When a man in great sorrow is spoken of, it is said, " Ah, how he did lift up his voice and weep !" '* Alas, how great is their trouble, they are all lifting up the voice." — Roberts. ' ' CHAPTER XXV. Ver. 1. And Samuel died; and all the Israelites were gathered together, and lamented him, and buried him in his house at Ramah. And Da- vid arose, and went down to the wilderness of Paran. / While walking out one evening, a few fields' distance from Deir el Kaner, with Hanna Doomani, the son of my host, to see a detached garden belonging to his father, he pointed out to me, near it, a small solid stone building, apparently a house ; very solemnly adding, " Kahbar beify," the sepulchre of our family. It had neither door nor window. He then directed my attention to a considerable number of similar buildings, at a distance ; which to the eye are exactly like houses, but which are in fact family mansions for the dead. Perhaps this custom may have been of great antiquity; and may serve to explain some scripture phrases. The prophet Samuel was buried in his house at Ramah : it could hardly have been his dwell- inghouse, compare 1 Kings ii. 34, Job xxx. 23. Possibly also the passages in Prov. ii. 18, 19, and vii. 27, and ix. 18, describing the house of a wanton woman, may have drawn their imagery from this custom. — Jowett. Ver. 5. Go to Nabal, and greet him in my name. Job xxix. 8. The aged arose and stood up. Acts xxviii. 10. Who also honoured me with many honours. In the Old and New Testaments we have some striking examples of what may be termed good-breeding. Look at the patriarchs and others in their renunciation of self, their anxiety to please, to show respect to the aged, and learned, the dignified, or those of the sacerdotal character ; listen to their affecting eulogies and their touching appeals, and then say, have we not in them some of the most pleasing instances of gentility and good-breeding 1 On their great anniversary festivals, the Hindoos always send to " greet" each other. Has a son or daughter got married ; has a " male child" been bom ; has prosperity attended the mer- chant in his pursuits ; does a traveller pass through a town or village where some of his friends or acquaintances re- side: then, those concerned send greeting expressive of their joy, and best wishes for future prosperity. See them on receiving company. A servant, or friend, stands at tht Chap. 25. 1 SAMUEL. 169 gate to watch for the approach of the guests, and to give notice to the master of the house. When they appi ">ach the premises the host goes out to meet them, and bow. and expresses his joy at seeing them ; he then puts his arm over their shoulders, or takes them by the hand, and conducts them into the house. When they retire also, he always accompanies them to the gate, and expresses the great joy he has had in their company. Before people take their food they always wash their hands, feet, and mouth ; and when they sit down, they take their places according to rank and seniority. Should any man presume to sit down " in the highest" place when he has not a title to it, he will be sure (as in the parable) to hear the master say to him, in respect to "a more honourable man,"-" Give this man place ;" and then, " with shame," he will be compelled " to take the lowest" place. In supplying the guests, the chief person present is always served the first, and generally by the hands of the host himself They are also particular as to the order of serving up their viands and condiments ; to set on the table certain articles first would be there con- sidered as much out of place as it is in England to set on the dessert before the more substantial dishes. Epicures at home would smile, and pout the lip, at the vegetable feast of a Saiva man. His first course consists of pulse, green gram, rice, trnd ghee, or butter ; the second, of numerous curries, and -ickles made of half-ripe fruits, vegetables, and spices : tlid third, an acid kind of broth ; the fourth, curds, honey, and rice ; the fifth, a rich supply of mellow fruits. From this humble repast the guests arise with more pleasure and at less expense of health, than the luxurious Englishman does from his half-medicated meal, to which science is now the footman, and a few French terms its fashionable vocabulary. When the visiters have taken what they require, the principal person arises from his seat, and all present follow nis example. — Roberts. Ver. 10. And Nabal answered David's servants, and said, Who is David ? and who is the son of Jesse % There be many servants now-a-days that break away every man from his master. When a man has gained some ascendency over others, or when he assumes authority which is offensive to some one present, it will be inquired, by way of contempt, as Nabal did respecting David, " Who is he'? and whose son is he 1"— Roberts. Ver. 16, They were a wall unto us, both by nig-ht and day, all the while we were with them keeping the sheep. This was said of David and his men, who had been kind unto the servants of Nabal, and had probably been a defence to them while they had been in the wilderness tending their sheep. And the same figure is also used among us, in ref- erence to those who have been a defence to others. " Ah ! my friend ; you have been a mathil, i. e. a wall, unto me." " Alas ! my wall is fallen," means, th» friend is dead, or be- come weak. " What care I for that jackal 1 I have a good wall before me." — Roberts. "V er. 23. And when Abigail saw David, she hasted, and lighted off the ass, and fell before David on her face, and bowed herself to the ground. A rider was expected to dismount, when he met a person of more elevated rank. Under the influence of this ancient i custom, the Egyptians dismount from their asses, when i they approach the tombs of their departed saints; and both : Christians and Jews are obliged to submit to the same Qer- emony. Christians in that country must also dismoiint wh..n they happen to meet with officers of the army. In Palestine, the Jews, who are not permitted to ride on horse- back, are compelled to dismount from their asses and pass by a Mohammedan on foot. This explains the reason that Achsah, the daughter of Caleb, and Abigail the wife of ' Nabal, alighted from their asses ; it was a mark of respect which the former owed to her father, and the latter to Da- vid, a person of high rank and growing renown. It was tindoubtedly for the same reason, that Rebecca alighted from the camel on which she rode, when the servant in- 23 formed her, that the stranger whom she descried at a dis- tance in the field, was his master ; and that Naaman, the Syrian grandee, alighted from his chariot, at the approach of Gehazi, the servant of Elisha. — Paxton. Ver. 29. Yet a man is risen to pursue thee, and to seek thy soul : but the soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of life with the Lord thy God ; and the souls of thine enemies, them shall he sling out, as out of the middle of a sling. Any thing which is important or valuable is called a kattu, i. e. " a bundle, a pack, a bale." A young man who is enamoured of a female, is said to be " bound up in the kattu, bundle, of love." Of a just judge the people say, " He is bound up in the bundle of justice." When a man is very strict in reference to his caste, " he is bound up in the bun- dle of high caste." When a pesson is spoken to respecting the vanities or impurities oi his system, he often replies, " Talk not to me, I am bound up in the bundle of my reli- gion." " Why do those people act so 1— Because they are bound up in the bundle of desire." David, therefore, was to be bound up in the bundle of life— nothing was to harm him. — Roberts. Ver. 35. So David received of her hand thai which she had brought him, and said unto her, Go up in peace to thy house : see, I have heark- ened to thy voice, and have accepted thy person. Does a person ask a favour of his superior ; it will not be, in general, said in reply, " I grant your request ;" or, ** You shall have your desire :" but, Nan un muggatli parf- tain, " I have seen thy face." Has a man greatly offended another, and does he plead for mercy ; the person to whom offence has been given will say, " I have seen thy face ;" which means, that he is pardoned. Should a friend in- quire, "Well, what punisnment do you intend to inflict on that fellow 7" he will reply, " I have seen his face." In ap- plying fcr help, should there be a denial, the applicant will ask, " In whose face shall I now look T' When a man has nearly lost all hope, he says, " For the sake of the face of God grant me my request." — Roberts. Ver. 36. And Abigail came to Nabal ; and, be- hold, he held a feast in his house, like the feast of a king : and Nabal's heart was merry within him, for he was very drunken : wherefore she told him nothing, less or more, until the morn- ing light. Sheep-shearing is an operation to which allusion is more frequently made in the sacred volume. The wool in very remote times was not shorn with an iron instrument, but plucked off" with the hand. From the concurrent testi- mony of several writers, the time when it is performed in Palestine, falls in the month of March. If this be ad- mitted, it fixes the time of the year when Jacob departed from Laban on his return to his father's house, for he left him at the time he went to shear his sheep. In like man- ner, the sheep of Nabal were shorn in the spring; for among the presents which Abigail made to David, five measures of parched corn are mentioned. But we Iriow, from other passages of scripture, that they were accus- tomed to use parched com when it was full grown, but not ripe ; for the people of Israel were commanded in the law not to eat parched corn nor green ears, until the self- same day they had made an offering to the Lord. This time seems to have been spent by the eastern swains, in more than usual hilarity. And it may be inferred from several hints in the scriptures, that the wealthier proprietors invited their friends and dependants to sumptuous entertain- ments. Nabal, on that joyous occasion, which the servants of David called a good, or festive day, although a churlish and niggardly man, "held a feast in his house, like the feast of a king;" and on a similar occasion, Absalom treat- ed his friends and relations in the same magnificent style .'he modern Arabs are more frugal and parsimonious; m 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 26. yet their hearts, so little accustomed to expand wii i joyous leelings, acknowledge the powerful influence of increasing wealth, and dispose them to indulge in greater jollity than usual. On these occasions, they perhaps kill a lamb, or a goat, and treat their relations and friends ; and at once to testify their respect for their guests, and add to the luxury of the feast, crown the festive board with new chee!>e and milk, dates and honey. — Paxton. Ver. 41. And she arose, and bowed herself on her face to the earth, and said, Behold, let thy handmaid be a servant to wash the feet of the servants of my lord. # The necessity for washing the feet in the East has been attributed to their wearing sandals ; but it is very requisite, according to Sir John Chardin, let the covering of the feet be of what kind it will. " Those that travel in the hot countries of the East," he tells us, " such as Arabia is, be- gin, at their arriving at the end of their journey, with pull- ing off the coverings of their feet. The sweat and the dust, which penetrate all sorts of coverings for the feet, produce a filth there, which excites a very troublesome itching. And though the eastern people are extremely careful to preserve the body neat, it is more for refreshment than cleanliness, that they wash their feet at the close of their journey." According to DArvieux, the little yellow morocco boots, worn by the Arabs, which are made very light, so as that they may walk in them afoot, and even run in them, are yet so tight as not to be penetrated by water ; but none of the eastern coverings for the foot, it seems, can guard against the dust ; consequently this custom of washing the feet is not to be merely ascribed to their use of sandals ; a circumstance that has not, I think, been attended to, and which therefore claims our notice.— Harmer, CHAPTER XXVI. Ver. 5, And David rose, and came to the place where Saul had pitched ; and David beheld the place where Saul lay, and Abner the son of Ner, the captain of his host : and Saul lay in the trench, and the people pitched round about him. The encampments of Israel in Canaan seem to have been opened and unguarded on all sides. When David rec- onnoitred the camp of Saul, the king " lay in the trench, and all the people pitched round about him." The Hebrew term magal never signifies a ditch and rampart, as our translators seem to have understood it, biit achariolor wag- on way, or highway, or the rut of a wheel in the ground. Nor is it to be understood of a ring of carriages, as the mar- ginal reading seems to suppose, and as Buxtorf interprets the word; for it is not probable that Saul would encumber his army with baggage in so rapid a pursuit, nor that so mountainous a country was practicable for wagons. It seems then simply to mean, the circle these troops formed, in the midst of which, as being the place of honour, Saul reposed. An Arab camp is always circular, when the dis- positions of the ground will permit, the chieftain being in the middle, and the troops at a respectable distance around him. Their lances are fixed near them in the ground, all the day long, ready for action. This was precisely the form and arrangement of Saul's camp, as described by the sacred historian. As it is a universal custom in the East to make the great meal at night, and consequently to fall into a deep sleep immediately after it, a handful of resolute men might easily .beat up a camp of many thousands. This circumstance undoubtedly facilitated the decisive victory which Gideon obtained over the combined forces of Midian. — Paxton. Ver. 11. The Lord forbid that I should stretch forth my hand against the Lord's anointed; but I pray thee, take thou now the spear that is at his bolster, and the cruse of water, and let us go. Thus did Saul sleep, with his head on the bolster, and a vessel of water by his side ; and in this way do all east- ern travellers sleep at this day. The bolster is round, about eight inches in diameter, and twenty in length. In travel- ling, it is carried roiled up in the mat on which the OAvner sleeps. In a hot climate, a draught of water is very re- freshing in the night ; hence a vessel filled with water is always near where a person sleeps. — Roberts. Ver. 13. Then David went over to the other side, and stood on the top of a hill afar off, a great space being between them : 1 4. And David cried to the people, and to Abner the son of Ner, saying, Answerest thou not, Abner? Theui; Abner answered and said. Who art thou that. criest to the king 1 The establishment of a colony of Jews in Abyssinia, is an event sufficiently vouched for by history ; and among other things, it has had the etFect of preserving in that country many usages of the Jews of Judea, traces of which we find in the historical books of scripture. The remote situation of this country, with our very imperfect knowl- edge of it, has rendered what evidence i,t furnishes obscure, and consequently feeble : nevertheless we find, occasionally, instances of such close conformity with scripture inci- dents, that their resemblance strikes even the least obser- vant. This has been stated in strong terms by Mr. Salt, one of our latest travellers into Abyssinia ; and has been lourd not less remarkable by Mr. Pearce, who resided there reveral years. It will be elucidated by the following extracts, which scarcely admit of additional remarks. " While the army er.iained encamped on this spot, Mr. Pearce went out on an excurs.ion with Badjerund Tesfos and Shalaka Lafsgee, and others ci ;ne Ras's people, for the purpose of carrymg oif some cattle which were known to be secreted in the neighbourhood. In this object the Earty succeeded, getting possession of more than three undred oxen ; but this was effected with very considera- ble loss, owing to a stratagem put in practice by Guebra Guro, and about fourteen of his best marksmen, who had placed themselves in a recumbent position on the over- hanging brow of a rock, which was completely inaccessi- ble, whence they picked oflT every man that approached within musketshot. At one lime Mr. Pearce was so near to this dangerous position, that he could understand every word said by Guebra Guro to his companions; and he distinctly heard him ordering his men not to shoot at either him (Mr. Pearce) or Ayto Tesfos, calling out to them at the same time with a strange sort of savage politeness, to keep out of the range of his matchlocks, as he was anxious that no harm should personally happen to them ; address- ing them very kindly by the appellation of friends. Oa Mr. Pearce's relating this incident to me, I was instantly struck with its similarity to some of the stories recorded in the Old Testament, particularly that of David, ' standing on the top of a hill afar off", and crying to the people ana to Abner, at the mouth of the cave, Answerest thou not, Abner % and now see where the king's spear is, and the cruse of water at his bolster.' The reader conversant in scripture cannot fail, I conceive, to mark, in the course of this narrative, the general resemblance existing through- out, between the manners of this people and those of the Jews previously to the reign of Solomon ; at which pe- riod the connexions entered into by the latter with for- eign princes, and the luxuries consequently introducei" seem in a great measure to have altered the Jewish cha acter. For my own part, I confess, that I was so mucj struck with the similarity between the two nations, durin] my stay in Abyssinia, that I could not help fancying r litnes that I was dwelling among the Israelites, and that had fallen back some thousand years upon a period whe the king himself was a shepherd, and the princes of th land went out, riding on mules, with spears and slings, " combat against the Philistines. It will be scarcelv nee ^ sary for me to observe, that the feelings of the Abyssin- ians towards the Galla partake of the same inveterate spirit of animosity which appears to have influenced the Israel ites with regard to their hostile neighbours." Taylor ' Calmet. Chap. 27. 1 S^AMUEL. ^7 Ver. 19. If the Lord have stirred thee up against me, let him accept an offering. The Hebrew has, for accept, " smell." Valuable gifts are said to have a pleasant smell. A man, also, of great property, " has an agreeable smell." " Why are you taking this siiiall present to the great man 1 it has not a good smell." " Alas ! I have been with my gifts to the Modeliar, but he will not smell of them;" .which means, he will not accept them. — Roberts. Ver. 20. Now therefore, let not my blood fall to the earth before the face of the Lord : for the king of Israel is come out to seek a flea, as when one doth hunt a partridge in the mount- ains. Thus did David compare himself to a flea, to show his insignificance before the king. When a man of rank de- votes his lime and talents to the acquirement of any thing which is not of much value, it is asked, " Why does he trouble himself so much about a flea 1" In asking a favour, should it be denied, it will be said, " Ah ! my lord, this is as a flea to you." " Our head man gave me this ring the other day, but now he wishes to have it again ; what is this 1 it is but a flea." When poor relations are troublesome, the rich say, "As the flea bites the long-haired dog, so are you always biting me." Should an opulent man be redu- ced to poverty his friends forsake him, and the people say, *' Yes, the same day the dog dies the fleas leave him." — Roberts. We find only two allusions to the partridge in the holy scriptures. The first occurs in the history of David, where he expostulates with Saul concerning his unjust and foolish pursuit : " The king of Israel is come out to seek a flea, as when one doth hunt a partridge on the mountains." The other in the prophecies of Jeremiah : " As the partridge sit- leth on eggs, and hatcheth them not ; so he that getteth riches, and not by right, shall leave them in the midst of his days, and at his end shall be a fool." The Hebrew name for the partridge is (m-^^p) kore, from the verb kara to cry, a name suggested by the narsh note of that bird. Bochart indeed denies that kore signifies the partridge ; he thinks the woodcock is intended, because the kore of which David speaks in the first quotation, is a mountain bird. But that excellent writer did not recollect that a species of partridge actually inhabits the mountains, and by consequence his argument is of no force. Nor is the opinion of others more tenable, that the kore hatches the eggs of a stranger, because Jeremiah observes, " she sitteth on eggs and hatcheth them not ;" for the passage only means, that the partridge often fails in her attempts to bring forth her young. To such disappointments she is greatly exposed from the position of her nest in the ground, where her eggs are often spoiled by wet, or crushed by the foot. The manner in which the Arabs hunt the partridge and other birds, affords an excel- liMit comment on the complaint of David to his cruel and rmrelenting sovereign; for observing that they become languid and fatigued after they have been hastily put up two or three times, they immediately run in upon them and knock them down with their bludgeons. It was precisely in this manner that Saul hunted David ; he came suddenly upon him, and from time to time drove him from his hiding- places, hoping at last to make him weary of life, and find an opportunity of effecting his destruction. When the prophet says the partridge sitteth on eggs, and hatcheth them not, the male seems to be understood ; because both the verbs are masculine, and the verb yalad in the mascu- Kne gender cannot signify to lay eggs. The red partridges of Prance, says Buffbn, appear to differ from the red par- tridges of Egypt; because the Egyptian priests chose for the emblem of a well-regulated family, two partridges, the one male, the other female, sitting or brooding together. And by the text in Jeremiah, it seems that in Judea the male jjartridge sat as well as the female. But while the V[ incubation of other birds, which are by no means so atten- tive, is generally crowned with success, the hopes of the partridges are frequently disappointed by circumstances already noticed, which she can neither see nor prevent.— Paxton. CHAPTER XXVII. Ver. 2. And David said to Achish, Surely thou shalt know what thy servant can do. And Achish said to David, Therefore will I make thee keeper of my head for ever. The head is always spoken of as the principal part of the body, and when a man places great confidence in another, he say;s, " I will make him the keeper of my life or head." An injured man expostulating with another, to whom he has been kind, asks, " Why is this % have I not been the keeper of your life." A good brother is called, " the life- keeping brother." But any thing valuable also is spoken of as being on the head. — Roberts. Ver. 10. And Achish said, Whither have ye made a road to-day ? And David said, Against the south of Judah, and against the south of the Jerahmeelites, and against the south of the Kenites. After the expedition was over, David returns to Achish, and upon being asked where he had made his incursion, David answers : Against the south of Judah, and against the south of the Jerahmeelites, and against the south of the Kenites. Mr. Bayle, not with extreme good manners, calls this A LIE. But, with his leave, the answer was literally true, but ambiguous; for all those people dwelt on the south of Judah, &c. Achish, through self-partiality, under- stood the answer to mean, that the incursion was made on the southern borders of Judah, the Jerahmeelites and Kenites themselves, though David asserted no such thing. David therefore was not guilty of any falsity ; and if he was in any thing to blame, it was for giving an ambiguous answer to a question to which he was not obliged to give any direct reply. Mr. Bayle says, " This conduct was very unjusti- fiable, in that he deceived a king to whom he had oW.iga- tions." But David's answer was not such as necessarily to impose on Achish, and therefore it may be as truly said^ that Achish put a deceit upon himself, as that David de- ceived him. I allow he intended to conceal from Achish who the people were that he invaded, and this he did, not by a lie, but by an answer true in fact. The precise deter- mined truth was, that he had made an incursion on the south of Judah and the Kenites. The Amalekites dwelt on the south of Judah, and the Kenites lived intermingled with them, till they removed by Saul's order, when he was sent to destroy the Amalekites, and probably returned to their former dwellings, after that expedition was over. It is certain at least, that they were much in the same situa- tion as before; viz. on the south of Judah, and at no great distance from the country of the Amalekites ; and therefore Achish might as reasonably have understood David's an- swer to mean, that he invaded the Amalekites and neigh- bouring hordes, who dwelt beyond the south parts of Judah, as that he invaded the southern parts of the very country of Judah. For the original words will equally bear this double version : against the country south of Judah, &c. and, against the south country of Judah. If Achish took David in a wrong sense, I do not see that David, in his cir- cumstances, was obliged to undeceive him. For as he had done Achish no injury in the expedition against the Amalekites, &c. so neither did he, in permitting him qui- etly to impose on himself. Whereas, had he convinced Achish of his mistake, he would have endangered his own life, and the destruction of all his people. The greatest and best casuists have allowed, that ambiguous answers are not always criminal, but sometimes justifiable, and par- ticularly in the critical situation in which David now was. Thus Grotius.: " When any word, or sentence, admits of more significations than one, whether from common use, or the custom of art, or by any intelligible figure ; and if the sense of one's own mind agrees to any one of these inter- pretations, it is no lie, though we should have reason to think, that he who hears us should take it in the other. Such a manner of speaking should not be used rashly ; but it may be justified by antecedent causes ; as when it is for the instruction of him who is committed to our care, of when it is to avoid an imjust interrogation ; i. e. as Grono-- vius erolains it, such an interrogation, which, if we gav« 171^. 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 28. a simple plain answer to, would hazard our own safety, or that of other innocent persons." Of this sentiment were Socrates, Plato, Xenophon, Cicero, the Stoics, Aristotle, Cluintilian, and others mentioned by Grotius ; and it may oe reasonably expected, that those who condemn David for his ambiguous answers to Achish, should fairly prove, that they are ia their nature, and therefore always, crimi- nal ; or in what circumstances they are so ; or that there is somewhat in thisanswer of David that peculiarly renders it so. Mr. Bayle thinks he savs something very considera- ble, when he says, " that he deceived ,a king to whom he had obligations ; others charge him with ingratitude, be- cause he deceived his patron and benefactor." This woald be an objection of some weight, if it could be proved that he deceived him to his real injury or that of his country. But this, as hath been shown, cannot be proved. A man may lawfully conceal his sentiments, on some occasions, even from a real friend and benefactor, who asks him questions, which, if clearly answered, may be prejudicial to his in- terest. Bat he had obligations to Achish, who was his patron and benefactor. What were these great obligations, and in what respects was Achish a benefactor to David *? Why, he allowed him, and his followers, a safe retreat into his country from the persecutions of Saul, for about sixteen months; first, at Gath his capital, and soon after, upon David's request, at Ziglag. But with what view did Achish allow him this retreat 1 Not with the noble gener- ous view of giving refuge to a brave man, ungratefully persecuted, and driven into exile by the unrelenting mal- ice of an arbitrary prince ; but merely from political mer- cenary considerations ; to detach so great a general, and so brave a body of soldiers, from the interest of their coun- try, and to prevent their joining with the Hebrew army in the defence of it, against that invasion which the Philistines were now meditating, and to engage him in actual hostili- ties with his own nation, that he might make him and them perpetual and irreconcilable enemies to each other. This appears from what Achish said, either to himself, or ■ some of the Philistine princes, upon the invasion of the Geshurites, «&c. He hath made his people Israel utterly to abhor him, therefore he shall be my servant for ever. Both Achish and David seem to have acted merely upon political principles in this affair, and their obligations to each other to be pretty equal. David fled for protection to Achish, but with no design to assist him agamst the He- brews. Achish received Da-vid, not out of any love and friendship to him, but to serve himself, by engaging David and his forces against the Hebrews, and thereby to put him under a necessity of continuing in his service for ever. They both appear to act with great confidence in each other, without either letting the other into their secret and real views ; and therefore as Achish was under no obliga- tion to David for his retiring to Gath, David was really under as little to Achish for the reception he gave him ; for as David would not have put himself under his pro- tection, but to serve his own purposes ; so neither would Achish have received him, had he not had his own views of advantage in doing it. David's deceiving Achish there- fore received no aggravation from any ingratitude in David towards him ; but the shelter Achish gave him was upon the mean, dishonourable, perfidious principle, of making David a detestable traitor to his king and country. — Chand- ler, CHAPTER XXVni. Ver. 1 . And it came to pass in those days, that the Philistines gathered their armies together for warfare, to fight with Israel. And Achish said unto David, Know thou assuredly, that thou shalt go out with me to battle, thou and thy men. 2. And David said to Achish, Surely thou shalt know what thy servant can do. And Achish said to David, Therefore will I make thee keeper of my head for ever. Soon after these transactions, while David yet remained jnthe territories of the Philistines, they formed their army to invade the Hebrews, when Achish said to David : fciow thou assuredly, that thou and thy men shall go with me to the camp ; his troops being now increased by a party from the tribe of Manasseh. David answered him : There- fore thou shalt know what thy servant witl do ; i. e. as some interpret the words : Achish met with a cheerful compliance from David ; and Mr. Bayle aiiirms, that it was not owing to David, that he did not fight under the standard of this Philistine prince, against the Israelites, in the unhappy war wherein Saul perished; or, as he further says, that when the Philistines had assembled their forces, David and hisbrave ad venturers joined the army of Achich, and would have fought like lions against their brethren, if the suspicious Philistines had not forced Achish to dis- miss them. I am extremely glad, however, that the prin- ces of the Philistines, who may reasonably be supposed to know as much of David's dispositions and views as any modern writers can do, were of a quite different opinion from Mr. Bayle and his followers ; who instead of believ- ing with Achish and Mr. Bayle, that David would have been so very fierce against his own people, made no doubt but he would have fought like a lion, or a tiger, against Achish and the Philistines. And indeed David's answer to Achish implies nothing like a cheerful compliance with him, to engage with his forces against his own people. Achish did not directly ask this, and therefore David had no occasion to make the promise. The demand was only that he would go to the camp. And the answer was, that he would there make Achish witness to his conduct. But this was so far from promising that he would employ his men, as Achish promised himself, as that it seems rather to imply a kind of denial ; and would appear, I believe, very unsatisfactory to most persons in like circumstances : " You shall see what I will do. I make no promise, but I will go with you to the camp, where you yourself will be judge of my conduct." An evidently cold and evasive answer. Thus far there appears to be nothing blameablein David's conduct, and it is worthy of observation, that David's going to the camp was not his own forward officious proposal to Achish, but the order of Achish to him, which he was not then in circumstances to dispute, and which, in his situation, he was forced to obey ; and therefore it is not true, that David voluntarily oflfered his assistance against Saul and the He- brews, to the Philistine army. If he was in any thing to blame, it was for throwing himself in the power of the Philistines. But he thought that this was the only method left him for the preservation of his life from the power and malice of Saul, who was therefore in reality responsible for David's conduct in this instance, and the real cause of that embar- rassment, in which he now unhappily found himself. His situation was undoubtedly very delicate and difficult, and it hath been thought impossible for him to have performed an honourable part, let him have acteflhow he would ; and that in his circumstances, he would not have deserved a much better character, had he betrayed his benefactor for the sake of his country, than he would, had he betrayed his country for the sake of his benefactor. But it hath been shown, that David owed Achish little thanks for the refuge he gave him, and that his debt of gratitude on this account was too small, to prevent him from exerting himself in his country's service, whenever he had an opportunity. But supposing his obligations to Achish were real, yet surely the affection and duty he owed his country were infinitely superior to any demands of friendship and gratitude thai Achish could have upon him. I will therefore suppose that David was reduced to the necessity of acting contrary to the gratitude he owed Achish, or the natural affisction and duty he owed his country. And can there be a mo- ment's doubt, whether private affection should not g-ive place to public 1 Or, whether one particular acciden- tal obligation to the avowed enemy of a man's country, and that greatly lessened by political views of interest in him who conferred it, should not yield to innumerable obliga- tions, arising out of nature, constant and immutable, and which to counteract would argue the most detestable base- ness, perfidy, and iniquity 1 Had David therefore been reduced to the hard nccessitv of fighting against Achish, or his country, though the alternative would have been gra- ting to a gienerous mind ; yet his preferring his duty, which he owed to his country, to his personal obligations to Achish, was right in itself, would have been truly heroic, and deserved immortal applause and commendation. Such was the virtue of the ancient Romans, that they would Chap. 28. 1 SAMUEL. 173 have sacrificed the love of father, son, brother, the nearest relations by blood and affinity, the obligations of friend- ship, and even life itself, to their affection to their country. And would they have scrupled, or thought it dishonour- able, to have sacrificed some personal obligations to an avowed enemy of it, when such sacrifice was necessary to it.s preservation and safety 7 But it is possible, that if David had continued with the Pliilistine.army, he might not have been reduced to the necessity of employing his arras against either his country, or the Philistines. May we not suppose, that before the engagement, David might have proposed terms of peace, in order to prevent if? Might he not have told Achish, that notwithstanding his personal obligations to him, he li;;d none to the Philistines in general, and therefore could not stand still, and see his countrymen destroyed by the Philistine forces 1 That unless they would give over the expedition, he should think himself obliged to join the army of Saul, and do his utmost to prevent their destruction 1 And would not this have been acting like a man of honour, a lover of his country, and been consistent with any grati- tude that he owed to Achish for his protection 1 This, I think, I may safely affirm, that it is in all views of policy impossible that, as Mr. Bayle asserts, he could have fought under the standard of the Philistine princes against the Israelites. For as he had in immediate view the throne of Israel, had he fought in the Philistine army against his own nation, it must have irritated all the tribes of Israel against him, and according as Achish wished, made all his people abhor him for ever ; whereby he would have cut off every possible prospect of succeeding to the crown. But David was too pruaent a man to take such a step, and if Achish endeavoured, by forcing him into his camp, to ensnare and ruin him with his own nation ; as he well knew the intention of Achish, he had a right to guard against it, to counteract policy by policy, and though obliged to give an answer, to give him such a one, as .should leave himself at liberty to act as prudence and duty should direct him. And finally, had he turned his arms against the Philistines, he might have shoMTi his gratitude to Achish, without injuring his country, by affording him protection in his turn, and securing his person, and the lives of many of his people, had the Israelites been victo- rious in the engagement. However, Achish had such an opinion of his interest in David's friendship, that he took his answer in good part, and concluding that he was entirely gained over to his interest, and the more effectually to se- cure and encourage him, promises him: " I will make you keeper of my head for ever:" you shall be always near me, and have the charge of my person. David made no reply, but kept himself entirely upon the reserve, without idisclosing the real sentiments of his mind. He followed Achish with his forces, who marched into the territories of the Hebrews, and encamped at Shunem, in the tribe of Naphtali ; while Saul, with his army, pitched their tents on the famous mountains of Gilboa. — Chandler. Ver. 7. Then said Saul unto his servants, Seek me a woman that hath a familiar spirit, that I may go to her, and inquire of her. And his servants said to him, Behold, there is a woman that hath a familiar spirit at En-dor. 8. And Saul disguised himself, and put on other rai- ment, and he went, and two men with him, and they came to the woman by night ; and he said, 1 pray thee, divine unto me by the familiar spirit, and bring me him up whom I shall name unto thee. 9. And the woman said unto him, i Behold, thou knowest what Saul hath done, how he hath cut off those that have familiar spirits, and the wizaras, out of the land : where- fore then layest thou a snare for my life, to cause me to die? 10. And Saul sware to her by the Lord, saying, As the Lord liveth, there shall no punishment happen to thee for this thing. 1 1 . Then said the woman, Whom.shall I bring up unto thee ? And he said, Bring me up Samuel. 12. And when the woman saw Samuel, she cried with a loud voice : and the woman spake to Saul, saying, Why hast thou deceived me? for thou art Saul. 13. And the king said unto her, Be not afraid: for what sawest thou ? And the woman said unto Saul, I saw gods ascending out of the earth. How long the profession of necromancy, or the art of i raising up the dead, in order to pry into future events, or ! to be informed of the fate of the living, has obtained in the j world, we have no indications from hiVtory. We perceive I no footsteps of it in the ages before the flood, apd yet it is ' strange that a people, abandoned to all kind of wickedness in a manner, could keep themselves clear of this ; but our account of these times is very short. The first express mention that we meet with of magicians and sorcerers is almost in the beginning of the book of Exodus, where Moses is soliciting the deliverance of the children of Israel out of Egypt ; and therefore Egypt, which affected to be the mother of most occult sciences, is supposed to have been the inventress of this. From Egypt it spread itself into the neighbouring countries, and soon infected all the East ; for, as it imderiook to gratify man's inquisitiveness and super- stitious curiosity, it could not long want abetters. From Egypt, it is certain that the Israelites brought along with them no small inclination to these detestable practices, and were but too much addicted to them, notwithstanding all the care that the state had taken to suppress them, and the provision which God had made, by establishing a method of consulting him, to prevent their hankering after them. The injunction of the law is very express : — " When thou art come into the land which the Loru thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you any that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer ; for all that do these things are an abomination to the Lord." And there- fore their punishment was this : — " A man or a woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones, their blood shall be upon them." Nor was it only the practisers of such vile arts, but those likewise that resorted to them upon any oc- casion, that were liable to the same punishment; for " the soul that turneth after such as have familiar spirits, and after wizards, to go a-whoring after them, I will even set my face against that soul, and will cut him off from among his people, saith the Lord." Such was the severity of the Jewish laws against those who either practised or encour- aged any manner of magical arts ; and it must be said in Saul's commendation, that he had put the laM's in execu- tion against such vile people ; he had destroyed and drove away those that had familiar 'spirits, and the wizards out of the land ; and yet, (observe the weakness as well as wickedness of the man !) when himself fell into distress, and had abundant reason to believe that God had forsaken him, he flees to one of these creatures for relief, and re- quests of her to raise up his old friend Samuel, as expecting, very probably, some advice from him : but, whether this was really done or not, or, if done, in what manner it was effected, are points that have so much exercised the heads and pens, both of ancient and modern, both of Jewish and Christian writers, that little or nothing new can be said upon them ; and therefore all that I shall endeavour to do, will be, to reduce their several sentiments into as narrow a ' compass, and to state them in as fair a light, as I can, by inquiring into these three particulars: — 1. Whether there was a real apparition. 3. What this apparition (if real) was ; and, 3. By what means, and for what purposes, it was effected. 1. It cannot be denied, indeed, but that those who explode the reality of the apparition, and make it to be all nothing but a cheat and juggle of the sorceress, have found out some arguments that, at first sight, make a tolerable ap- pearance. They tell us that the sacred history never once makes mention of Saul's seeing Samuel with his own eyes It informs us, indeed, that Saul knew him by the descrip- tion M^hich the woman gave, and that he held, for some considerable time, a conversation with him ; but since it is nowhere said that he really saw him, " why might not the tU 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 28, woman couiterfeit a voice, say they, and pretend it was Samuel's 1 Wiien Saul asked her to raise him up Samuel, i. e. to disturb the ghost of so great a prophet, she might think he was no common man ; and when he swore unto her by the Lord, that he would defend her from all danger, he gave her intimation enough that he was the king. The crafty woman therefore having picked up the knowledge of this, might retire into her closet, and there, having her familiar, i. e. some cunning artful man, to make proper responses, in a different voice, might easily impose upon one who was distracted with anxious thoughts, and had already shown suflicient credulity, in thinking there was any efficacy in magical operations to evocate the dead. The controversy betAveen Saul and David every one knew ; nor was it now become a secret, that the crown was to de- volve upon the latter ; and therefore that part of the dis- course, which passed between Saul and Samuel, any man of a common genius might have hit off, without much diffi- culty. Endor was not so far distant from Gilboa or Shunem, but that the condition of the two armies might easily be known, and that the Philistines were superior both in courage and numbers ; and therefore his respondent, with- out all peradventure, might prognosticate Saul's defeat ; and though there was some hazard in the last conjecture, viz. that he and his sons would die in battle ; yet there was this advantage on the side of the guess, that they were all men of known and experienced valour, who would rather sacrifice their lives than turn their backs upon their ene- mies." Upon the whole, therefore, the maintainers of this system conclude, that as there is no reason, so there was no necessity, for any miraculous interposition in this affair, since this is no more than what any common gipsy, with another in confederacy to assist her, might do to any credulous person who came to consult her. They who undertake to oppose this opinion lay it down for a good rule, in the interpretation of scripture, that we should, as far as we can, adhere to the primary sense of the words, and never have recourse to any foreign or sin- gular explications, but where the literal is inconsistent, either with the dictates of right reason, or the analogy of faith. Let any indifferent person then, say they, take into his hand the account of Saul's consulting this sorceress, and upon the first reading it he must confess, that the notion which it conve5''s to his mind, is that of a real apparition ; and since the passages that both precede and follow it, are confessedly to be taken in their most obvious meaning, why should a strange and forced construction be put upon this 1 Apparitions indeed are not very common things ; but both Sacred and profane history inform us, that they are realities, as the examples of Moses and Elias, conversing with our •Saviour on the mount, and the several bodies of saints, which slept, coming out of their graves after his resurrec- tion, and appearing unto many, do abundantly testify. It is owned, indeed, that according to the series of the nar- ration, Saul did not see the spectre (be it what it will) so soon as the woman did, because, probably, the woman's body, or some other object, might interpose between him ana the first appearance; or perhaps, because the vehicle which Samuel assumed upon this occasion, was not as yet con- densed enough to be visible to Saul, though it was to the woman: but, that he did actually see him is manifest, because, when he perceived (which word in the original signifies seeing so as to be assured of our object) that it was Samuel, he stooped with his face to the ground, and bowed himself, which a man is not apt to do to bare ideas or im- aginations. Persons of this woman's character, who are under the displeasure of the government, generally affect obscurity, live privately, and are Httle acquainted with affairs of state ; but suppose her to have been ever so great a politician, and ever so intimate with what had passed between Saul and Samuel heretofore, ever so well assured that God had rejected him, and elected David in his stead ; yet how could she come to the knowledge of this, viz., that the battle should be fought the next day, the Israelites be routed, Saul and his sons slain, and their spoils fall into the ene- my's hands ; since each of these events (even in the present situation of Saul's affairs) were highly casual and uncer- tain 1 For mis:ht not this prince lose a battle without losing his lifel Or if he himself fell in the action, why must his three sons be all cut off in the same day 1 Whatever de- monstrations of innate bravery he had given in times past, after such severe menaces as he now received from the ap- parition, prudence, one would think, would have put him upon providing for his safety, either by chicaning with the enemy, or retiring from the field of battle, without going to expose himself, his sons, and his whole army, to certain and inevitable death. These are things which nd human penetration could reach, and which only he whb is the ab- solute and Almighty ruler of all causes and events, could either foresee or predict. But the truth is, those menacing predictions, how proper soever for a messenger* sent from God to utter, were highly imprudent either in this witch's, or her accomplice's, mouth: for since they knew nothing of futurity, and were, at the best, but put to conjecture, it is much more reasonable to believe, that at such a juncture as this, they would have bethought themselves of flattering the king, and giving him comfort, and promising success, and not of thundering out such comminations against him as might probably incense him, but could do them no good. They could not but know that the temper of most kings is, to hate to hear shocking truths, and to receive with the ut- most despite those that bring them ill news : and there- fore it is natural to suppose, that had these threatening re- plies been of the woman's or her confederate's forming, they would have given them quite another turn, and not ran the hazard of disobliging the king to no J)urpose, by laying an additional load of trouble upon him. The truth is, the woman, by her courteous entertainment of Saul, seems to be a person of no bad nature; and therefore, if she had an accomplice, who understood to make the most of his profession, his business, at this time, must have been to sooth and cajole the king, which would have both put money in his pocket, and saved the credit of his predictions. For, had he foretold him of success and victory, and a happy issue out of all his troubles, he and the woman had been sure of reputation, as well as further rewards, in case it had happened to prove so ; and if it had not (since no one was privy to their communion) the falsehood of the predic- tion upon Saul's defeat and death, must, in course, have been buried with him. From these reasons then we may infer, that the woman, in this transaction, did not impose upon Saul, since he had a plain sight of the apparition ; what the apparition fore- told him, was above human penetration ; and (upon the supposition of a juggle) the witch and her confederate would have certainly acted clean contrary to what they did. And so the next, 2, Inquiry meets us, namely, What this apparition wasi Some of the ancient doctors, both of the Jewish and Chris- tian church, have made an evil angel the subject of this apparition, in pure regard to the honour of God. " God, say they, had sufficiently declared his hatred against nec- romancy, and all kinds of witchcraft, in the severe laws which he enacted against them ; but it is certainly denying himself, and cancelling his own work, to seem in the least to countenance or abet them, as he necessarily must do, if, upon the evocation of an old hag, any messenger is permit' ted to go from him. Far be it from us therefore to have such conceptions of God. He is holy, and just, and uni- form in all his ways ; and therefore this coming at a call, and doing the witch's drudgery, must only appertain to some infernal spirit, who might possibly find his account in it at last. It was one of this wicked crew, that either assumed a phantom, or a real body, appeared in a mantle like Samuel, spake articulately, and held this conversation with Saul ; which, considering his knowledge and foresight of things, he was well enough qualified to do, notwithstand- ing the sundry predictions relating to future contingencies, which are contained in it." How far the honour of God is concerned in this transaction, will more properly fall under our next inquiry: in the mean time, I cannot but observe, that whatever incongruity may be supposed in the real appearance of Samuel, it is not near so much, as to find one of the apostate spirits of hell expressing so much zeal for the service of the God of heaven, and upbraidin" Saul with those very crimes which he himself tempt him to commit ; as to find this wicked and impure spirj making use of the name of God (that sacred and treme dous name, whose very pronunciation was enough to mal him quake and shiver") no less than six times, in this inter- course with Saul, without any manner of uneasiness or hesitation ; as to find this angel of darkness and father of lies, prying into the womb of futurity, anc determining th Ghap. 28. 1 SAMUEL. 175 most casual events positively and precisely. We do not indeed deny but that the devil's knowledge is vastly supe- • rior to that of the most accomplished human understand- ing; that his natural penetration, joined with his long experience, is such, that the greatest philosophers, the subtlest critics, and the most refined politicians, are mere novices in comparison of him ; yet what genius, (however exacted and improved,) without a divine revelation, could (as we said before) be able to foretel things that were lodged in God's own breast, viz. the precise time of the two armies engaging, the success and consequence of the victory, and the very names of the persons that were to fall in battle. This is what the apparition plainly revealed to Saul: and yet this, we dare maintain, is more than any finite understanding, by its own mere capacity, could ever have been able to find out. But (without this multi- tude of arguments) if we are to take the scripture in its plain and literal sense, read we over the story of Saul and the witch of Endor ever so often, we shall not so much as once find the devil mentioned in it. And therefore it is somewhat wonderful that he should be brought upon the stage by many learned men, merely to solve a difficulty which, upon examination, appears to be none at all. But now on the other hand, it appears that through the whole narration, Samuel is the only thing that is mentioned. It is Samuel whom Saul desires to be called up ; Samuel, who appeared to the woman ; Samuel, whom the woman describes ; Samuel, whom Saul perceives and bows him- self to, with whom he converses so long, and, because of whose words, he was afterward so sore afraid. The scripture indeed speaks sometimes according to the ap- pearance of things, and may call that by the name of Sam- uel, which was only the semblance or phantom of him : but that this cannot be the sense of the matter here, we have the testimony of the wise son of Sirach, (an excellent interpreter of canonical scriptures,) who tells us expressly, that Samuel, after his death, prophesied and showed the king his end ; pursuant to what we read in the version of the Septuagint, viz. that Saul asked counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, and Samuel answered him. So that, upon the whole, we may be alloAved to conclude, that it was the real soul of Samuel, clothed in some visible form, which, at this time, appeared to the king of Israel : but by what means, or for what purposes, it appeared, is the other question we are now to determine. 3. Several of the fathers of the Christian church were of opinion, that the devil had a certain limited power over the souls of the saints, before Jesus Christ descended into hell, and rescued them from the tyranny of that prince of darkness. St. Austin, in particular, thinks that there is no absurdity in saying, that the devil was as able to call up Samuel's soul, as he was to present himself among the sons of God, or set our Saviour on one of the pinnacles of the temple ; and a learned Jewish doctor supposes that devils have such a power over human souls, for the space of a year after their departure, as to make them assume what bodies they nlease; and thereupon he concludes, (but very erroneously,) that it was not a year from the time of Samuel's death to his appearance. But these are such wild and extravagant fancies as deserve no serious confu- tation. It is absurd to say that the souls of saints (such as we are now speaking of) were ever in hell, and more absurd to say, that if they are in heaven it is in the power of any magical, nay, of anv diabolical incantation, to call them "down from thence. Great, \f ithout all doubt, is the power of apostate angels ; but miserable, we may say, would the state of the blessed be, if the other had any license to disturb their happiness, when, and as long as they pleased: "For God forbid," says Tertullian, "that we should believe the soul of any holy man, much less of a prophet, should be so far under his disposal, as to be brought up at pleasure by the power of the devil." Since the devil then has no power to disturb the happiness of souls depart- ed, this apparition of Samuel could not proceed from any magical enchantments of the sorceress, but must have been effected by the sole power and appointment of God, who is the sovereign Lord, both of the living and of the dead : and, accordingly, we may observe from the surprise which the woman discovered upon Samuel's sudden appearing, that the power of her magic was not concerned therein, but : that it was the effect of some superior hand. The scripture i 'dates the matter thus : " When the woman saw Samuel, she cried with a loud voice, lard the woman spake unto Saul, ! laying. Why hast thou deceived me, for thou art Saul 1 And the king said anto her. Be not afraid, what sawest thoul And the woman said unto Saul, 1 saw gods ascending out of the earth." Now it is plain from this nar- ration, that the woman saw something she was not accus- tomed to see. Her necromancy had ordinary power over demons only, or such wretched spirits as were submitted to the devil's tyranny; but, on this occasion, she saw an object so august, so terrible, so majestic, so contrary indeed to any thing she had ever raised before, and that coming upon her before she had begun her enchantments, that she could not forbear being frightened, and crying out with a loud voice, as being fully satisfied that the apparition came from God. " But since the scripture assures us, that God had wholly withdrawn himself from Saul, and would answer him, neither by prophets nor by dreams; how can we imagine that he should, all on a sudden, become so kind as to send Samuel to him, or that Samuel should be in any disposition to come, when it was impossible for him to do any good by his coming 1" Now there seems to be some analogy between God's dealing with Saul in this particular, and his former treatment of the prophet Ba- laam. Balaam was for disobeying the orders which God had given him to bless the Israelites ; and was searching into magical secrets for what he could not obtain of God, viz. a power to change into curses the blessings which God pronounced by his mouth. In this case there was but small likelihood that God would continue to communicate himself to a person so unworthy of any extraordinary rev- elation ; and yet he did it : but then, it was with a design to reveal to him those very miseries from which his mer- cenary mind was so desirous to rescue the Midianites. The application is easy: and it further suggests this reason why God appointed Samuel at this time to appear unto Saul, viz. that through him he might give him a meeting, where he least of all expected one; and might show him that the fate which his own disobedience had brought upon him was determined ; that there was no re- versing the decrees of heaven, no procuring aid against the Almighty's power, no fleeing (though it were to hell) from his presence, no hiding himself in darkness from his inspection ; with whom darkness is no darkness at all, but the night is as clear as the day, and the darkness and light are both alike. That the soiils of men departed have a capacity, and, no doubt, an inclination to be employed in the service of men alive, as having the same nature and affections, and being more sensible of our infirmities than any pure and abstracted spirits are, can hardly be contest- ed ; that in their absent state, they are imbodied with aerial, or ethereal vehicles, which they can condense or rarify at pleasure, and so appear, or not appear to human sight, is what some of the greatest men, botn of the heathen and Christian religion, have maintained; and that frequent apparitions of this kind have happened since the world began, cannot be denied by any one that is conversant in its history : if therefore the wisdom of God (for reasons already assigned) thought proper to despatch a messenger to Saul upon this occasion, there may be some account given why the soul of Samuel (upon the supposition it was left to its option) should rather be desirous to be sent upon that errand. For, whatever may be said in diminution of Saul's religious character, it is certain that he was a brave prince and commander ; had lived in strict intimacy with Samuel ; professed a great esteem for him in all things ; and was by Samuel not a little lamented, when he had fallen from his obedience to God. Upon these considera- tions we may imagine, that the soul of Samuel might have such a kindness for him as to be ready to appear lo him in the depth of his distress, in order to settle his mind, by telling him the upshot of the whole matter, viz. that he should lose the battle, and he and his sons be slain ; that so he might give a specimen (as the Jews love to speak in commendation of him) of the bravest valour that was ever achieved by any commander ; fight boldly when he was sure to die ; and sell his life at as dear a price as possible ; that so, in his death, he might be commemorated with honour, and deserve the threnodia which his son-in-law- made on him ; " The beauty of Israel is slain upon tht. high places ; how are the mighty fallen ! From the blood of the slain, from ^he fat of the mighty, the bow of Jona- 176 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 29. than turned not back, and the sword of Saul turned not empty. How are the mighty fallen in the midst of the battle !"— Stackhouse. Ver. 14. And he said unto her, What form is he of? And she said, An old man cometh up ; and he is covered with a mantle. And Saul perceived that it was Samuel, and he stooped with his face to the ground, and bo wed. himself. In»augury it seems to have been usual to represent those who were to be consulted, and whose oracular declarations were to be received, as covered with a mantle, or some garment. This certainly gave an appearance of mystery to such transactions. Thus it appears the Roman acted, according to what Plutarch says in his Life of Numa. " Taking with him the priests and augurs, he went up to the capitol, which the Romans at that time called the Tar- peian Rock. There the chief of the augurs covered the head of Numa, and turned his face towards the south." It appears from Livy that the augur covered his own head, not that of Numa. The augur always wrapped up his head, in a gown peculiar to his office, when he made his observations. — Burder, Ver. 20. Then Saul fell straightway all along on the earth, and was sore afraid, because of the words of Samuel : and there was no strength in him ; for he had eaten no bread all the day, nor all the night. When people are under the influence of great sorrow or fear, they always do the same thing, and roll themselves along, making bitter lamentations. And when men have escaped great danger, they roll themselves on the earth to the distance of a quarter of a mile, after the car of the tem- ple, in performance of their vow. — Roberts. Ver. 23. But he refused, and said, I will not eat. But his servants, together with the woman, compelled him ; and he hearkened unto their voice ; so he arose from the earth, and sat upon the bed. Saul, no doubt, on account of his sorrow and fear, refused to eat, as do others under similar circumstances at this day. But when people are angry also they decline taking their food. Should the wife not bring the dinner to her lord! at the proper time, or should it not be properly prepared, he declares he will not partake of it, and that he has made up his mind to die of hunger. She entreats him by the love she bears for him, she touches his feet with her hands, and strokes his chin, but no ! he has made up his mind ; die he will. " She shall have no more trouble." The afflicted woman then runs to call the mother or sisters of her inex- orable lord, who has determined to commit suicide by star- vation. They all come round him, but his eyes are fixed on the ground, and there are the viands just as left by his weeping wife. Then commence their tender entreaties, backed by the eloquence of tears ; the mother, the sisters, the wife, all beseech him to take a little, and then the matron, from whose hand he has often been fed before, Euts a little into his mouth, and it is merely to please them e begins to eat. — Roberts. Ver. 24. And the woman had a fat calf in the house ; and she hasted, and killed it, and took • flour and kneaded it, and did bake unleavened bread thereof: 25. And she brought it before Saul, and before his servants ; and they did eat. Then they rose up, and went away that night. This calf was killed, dressed, cooked, and eaten in as short a time as possible ; which might be called for from the necessity of the guest. But it is evident from other pas- sages that it was a custom to kill, cook, and eat an animal in a very short time. The heat of the climate certainly prevents flesh from being kept many hours, but there is no need to put the animal on the fire while its flesh is still warm. The people affect to be disgusted with us for keep- ing fowls six or eight hours before they are cooked, and say we are fond of eating chettareyche, i. e. dead flesh: There are some Englishmen who become so accustomed to these things, that they have the chicken grilled, and on their table, which a quarter of an hour before was playing in their yard. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXIX. Ver. 1. Now the Philistines gathered together all their armies to Aphek : and the Israelites pitched by a fountain which is in Jezreel. The Archbishop of Tyre tells us, (^Gesta dei,) that the Christian kings of Jerusalem used to assemble their forces at a fountain between Nazareth and Sepphoris, which was greatly celebrated on that accoimt. This being looked upon to be nearly the centre of their kingdom, they could from thence, consequently, march most commodiously to any place where their presence was wanted. He mentions also another fountain near a town called Little Gerinum, which, he says, was the ancient Jezreel ; near this Saladin pitched his camp, for the benefit of its waters, while Bald- win, king of Jerusalem, had, as usual, assembled his army at the first-mentioned place. » Of the fountain Ain-el-Scanderoni, Buckingham re- marks, " This is a modern work ; the charitable gift, per- haps, of some pious Mussulman, being well built, with a cistern beneath an arch, whence issue two streams, and over which is an Arabic inscription of several lines. It has, besides, a square platform, walled in, for prayers, shelter, or refreshment, and a flight of steps ascending to it, with a dome of a sepulchre, now partly buried by the falling in of adjacent ruins." — Burder. Ver. 2. And the lords of the Philistines passed on by hundreds and by thousands ; but David and his men passed on in the rearward with Achish. 3. Then said the princes of the Phi- listines, What do these Hebrews here ? And . Achish said unto the princes of the Philistines, Is not this David, the servant of Saul the king of Israel, which hath been with me these days, or these years, and I have found no fault in him since he fell unto me unto this day? The situation of Saul's mind, after this 'adventure, must have been very anxious and distressed, as he received no directions from Samuel how to behave in, or extricate himself out of, the difficulties in which he found himself involved. Nor were David's circumstances much easier, who had been pressed into the Philistine camp and service by Achish, whereby he was reduced to the greatest straits, and scarce knew how to behave himself, consistently with the confidence which that prince placed in him, the duty he owed to his own country, and his own interest and views, as an expectant of the crown and kingdom of Is- rael But happily for David, providence extricated him from th'is embarrassment ; for as the troops of the Philis- tines were passing in review before their principal officers, David also with his corps marched in the rear, under the command of Achish J^ing of Gath. This gave great un- easiness to the Philistine princes, who immediately expos- tulated with Achish, and said. What business havethese Hebrews in our army'? Achish answered: Is not this the gallant David, formerly the servant and officer of Saul the king of Israel ; who, to save himself from the persecution and cruelty of his ungrateful master, hath put himself un- der my protection, and of whose fidelity and attachment to my person and service, I have had long experience 1 For though he hath been with me now a considerable time, I have not had the least reason to suspect his integrity, or find fault with his conduct. But this was far from remov- ing the jealousy of the Philistine officers, who, highly dis- pleased with Achish for what they judged his ill-placed confidence in David, said in great anger to him: Com- mand this man immediately to retire from the army, and to go back to Ziklag, the place thou hast appointed for his residence. We will not suffer him to go with us to the battle, lest in the engagement he should turn his forces Chap. 30. 1 SAMUEL. 17 against us. Poi wh|t more effectual method can he take to.reconcile him^^elf to his former master, than by lending his assistance to defeat and destroy our army 1 Is not this that very David whose praises were publicly celebrated in songs and dances 1 And in honour of whom the Israelitish women cried out in triumph : Saul hath slam his thousands, and David his ten thousands. Such a man is too danger- ous to trust in our present critical situation. Achish find- ing the princes peremptorily fixed in their resolution not to permit David and his forces to go with them to the en- gagement, immediately sent for him, and said, " By the life of Jehovah, I acknowledge thy integrity in the whole of thy conduct towards me, and there is nothing that I more en- tirely approve, or more sincerely wish, than thy continu- ance in the army, and joining with us in the engagement, for I have nothing to reproach thee with, from the time thou didst first put thyself under my protection, to the present day. But the lords of the Philistines have not that opink)n of thy attachment to our interest and cause that I have, so that i am forced to dismiss thee from thy attendance. You must therefore return peaceably, and are allowed by them to do it in safety, to the town I have given you, because your longer continuance with us is disagreeable to them, and may be attended with very dangerous consequences." David, with seeming displeasure replied, " What have I done to incur their displeasure, or what hast thou found in thy servant, ever since 1 have been with thee, to forfeit thy confidence and favour'? Etowever, since it is their pleas- ure, I must submit, and will not, in obedience to their order, fight against the enemies of my lord the king." Achish told him, that " he was so far from entertaining any sus- picion of him, that he esteemed him for his integrity and worth, and regarded him as an angel, or messenger "from God, immediately sent to his assistance ; but that as the princes of the Philistines had resolved that lie should not go with them to the battle, he could not but order him to march away by daybreak with his master's servants to the place he had appointed for him and his followers." David accordingly returned with his troops into the territories of the Philistines, while their army penetrated farther into the dominions of Saul, and encamped at Jezreel. It appears from the answer given by David to Achish, as I have rendered the words, that David was not in the least displeased at his being dismissed, but gladly took Achish at his word, and laid hold of the first opportunity of disengaging himself from the service in which that prince expected his assistance. However, if we take David's answer in that sense, which is given it in our ver- sion : " What -have I done that I may not go fight against the enemies of my lord the king V it will appear to be a very prudent one, and such as became the circum- stances in which he then found himself, by which he promised nothing, and laid himself under no manner of engagement. It was a general, ambiguous, and cautious one ; in which he neither denies what the Philistines sus- pected, that he would fall off to Saul in the battle, nor makes the least mention of his readiness to fight with the Philist\'nes against Saul and the Hebrew army. He only asks, why he should be refused to fight againsl^the enemies of the king 1 If he had some obligations to him, to the Philistines he had none. Against the enemies of Achish he wou!d have fought, where he could have done it with honour; where he could not, as a man of honour, he must have refused it. Against the enemies of the Philistines, neither his inclination, or duty, or interest, would have permitted him to fight ; and the Philistines themselves did aot think his personal obligations to Achish a sufficient security for his assisting them ; and even Achish himself c^ems to have been at last in some doubt, whether or not he rould depend on him, when he says to him: "Rise up e'ctr?,y in the morning, Avith thy master's servants that are coiris with thee ;" hereby more than intimating, that he could, not but consider Saul as David's king and master, and all David's forces as servants to Saul; and actually urging this as a reason for their immediate departure from him. Had David made such a speech to Achish, previous to his dismission, or to the Philistine princes to prevent their dismissing him, it would have looked as though he had been uneasy at his not being suffered to assist them in th^ engagement. But as they had determined he should not go with them to battle, and Achish had peremptorily ordered him to march off; David, who could not but be 23 highly pleased that he was now wholly extricated from the difticulties he was involved in, artfully chose to ex- press himself to Achish in such terms, which, though they implied a real truth, yet might lead Achish to put a further meaning on them than David intended, in order to give Achish the highest opinion of his zeal for his service; by a general assurance, that he was always ready to assist him against his enemies, though he was now dismissed by the lords of the Philistines in a very reproachful and dis- honourable manner. I would further observe, that if there is any thing wrong in David's ambiguous reply to Achish, we should make the proper allowances for the circum- stances of the times, when morality was not carried to that noble height, as it is by the clearer light of the gospel revel ition. It appears from many instances in the Old Testament, that the greatest men did not think these am- biguous evasive answers, in any degree, or, as I appre- hend, at all criminal; especially ^en the preservation of life depended- on it. Let it therefore be allowed, with all my heart, that David, in his equivocal answers, did what, according to our present sentiments of morality, in this very enlightened and conscientious age, was not so perfectly agreeable to the stricter rules of it; he Aight still be an excellent man for the times he lived in; when such equivocations were generally allowed of, almost univer- sally practised, and by no means thought inconsistent with true religion and virtue, but rather in many cases neces- sary and commendable. — Chandler. CHAPTER XXX. Ver. 8. And David inquired at the Lord, saying. Shall I pursue after this troop? shall I over- take them ? And he answered him, Pursue : for thou shalt surely overtake ihem, and with- out fail recover all. The chosen people of Jehovah, not less eager than others to know the issue of their military expeditions, or if heaven regarded their undertakings with a favourable eye, had frequent recourse to the holy oracle ; they consulted the prophet of the Lord ; they offered sacrifices, and consulted with the high-driest who bore the Urim and Thummim in his breastplate, by means of which he discovered the will of the Deity; or, presenting himself at the altar of incense, received the desired response by an audible voice from the most holy place. The son of Jesse, in a time of great dis- tress and perplexity, consulted the oracle by means of an ephod, a part of sacerdotal vestments : " And David said to Abiathar the priest, Abimelech's son, I pray thee, bring me hither the ephod; and Abiathar brought hither the ephod to David. And David inquired at the Lord, saying. Shall I pursue after this troop 1 shall I overtake them 1 And he answered him, Pursue ; for thou shalt surely overtake them, and without fail recover all." Here was no bright- ening of arrows, after the custom of superstitious heathens; no consulting with images, nor inspecting of intestines, from which nothing but vague conjecture can result ; but a devout and humble application to the throne of the true God ; and the answer was in every respect worthy of his charac- ter; it was clear and precise, at once authorizing the pur- suit, and promising complete success; or forbidding them, in plain terms, to prosecute their designs. — Paxton. Ver. 11. And they found an Egyptian in the field, and brouofht him to David, and gave him bread, and he did eat: and they made him drink wa- ter; 12. And they gave him a piece of a cake of figs, and two clusters of raisins : and when he had eaten, his spirit came again to him ; for he had eaten no bread, nor drunk any water, three days and three nights. Thevenot says, " At about five o'clock in the morning, when passing by the side of a bush, we heard a voice that called to us, and being come to the place, we found a poor languishing Arab, who told us, that he had not eaten a bit for five days: we gave him some victuals and drink, with a provision of bread for two days more." This was on the journey from Suez to Tor. — Burder. 178 1 SAMUEL. Chap. 80. Ver. 16. And when he had brought him ciown, behold, they were spread abroad upon all the earth, eating and drinking, and dancing, be- cause of all the great spoil that they had taken out of the land of the Philistines, and out of the land of Judah. This is said of the Amalekites, after they had spoiled Ziklag. Parkhurst says, under in on the above, also on 1 Kings xii. 32, " It plainly denotes dancing round in cir- cles ;" and he believes the word " is applied to the celebra- tion of religious feasts, whether in honour of the true God, or of idols," and he cites several passages in support of his opinion. When the heathen worship their demon gods, they dance in circles round the sacrifices, throw themselves into the most violent contortions; the arms, head, and legs, appear as if they were In convulsions. They throw them- selves suddenly on the ground, then jump up, and again join in the circular dance. — Roberts. Ver. 17. And David smote them from the twilight even* unto the evening of the next day ; and there escaped not a man of them, save four hun- dred young men which rode upon camels, and fled. There were two reasons, exclusive of all religious con- siderations, that fully justified David in this attack upon the Amalekites. He now resided among the Philistines, in whose country these Amalekites had made great depreda- lions, while the Philistines themselves were engaged in war with the Hebrews, and incapable of defending their own frontiers. He was their ally, obliged to act in their favour, and behaved like a soldier of honour in avenging the in- juries that had been done them. This insult of David therefore upon the Amalekites was not unprovoked, if we consider his connexion with the Philistines ; much less, if we add to this, the loss he himself and his men sustained. For surely the burning of the city where he dwelt, the lead- ing captive into slavery his own wives, and the wives and children of above six hundred persons, and the making a booty of all their substance, must have been the highest provocation to men, that had any feeling of natural affec- tion. David and his soldiers thought it so ; and if it be lawful to put to death incendiaries, women and children stealers, thieves, robbers, and vagabonds ; David's execu- ting this vengeance on the Amalekites for their treachery in making this invasion, and committing these unprovoked violences, while neither the Philistines nor Hebrews could defend their territories, was a deserved and necessary se- verity. — Chandler. Ver. 21. And they went forth to meet David, and to meet the people that were with him ; and when David came near to the people, he saluted them. This was a usual mode of honouring persons of dignity. "Before any person of rank enters a city, it is usual for him to be received by a deputation. If his rank is very considerable, the Peeshwaz is sent to a great distance. A thousand men were sent to meet the prince, halfwav be- tween Ispahan and Sheeraz, a hundred miles." (Wa- nng's Tour to Sheeraz.) " At this place (Jerusalem) two Turkish officers, mounted on beautiful horses, sumptuous- ly caparisoned, came to inform us, th it the governor, hav- ing intelligence of our approach, had sent them to escort us into town." (Clarke's Travels.) — Burder. " Saluted them." Hebrew, " asked them how they did." It is in the East, as in England, a Qommon mode of saluta- tion to inquire after the health. They do not, however, , answer in the same unhesitating way. When a man has perfectly recovered from a fit of sickness, he will not say, •' I am quite well," because he would think that like boasV ing, and be afraid of a relapse; he would, therefore, say, " I am a little better— not quite so ill as I was :" sometimes, when the question is asked, he will reply, "Can you not ^ee for yourself? what answer can I givel" To say you look well, or have become stout, is very annoying. A short time after my arrival in Ceylon, a very stout Brai":Q paid me a visit, and on my saying he looked remarkably well, he fell mto a great rage and left the room. I ept- plained to him afterward that I did not mean any offence, and he said it was very unfortunate to be addressed in such language. — Roberts. Ver. 24. For who will hearken unto you in this matter ? but as his part is that goeth down to the battle, so shall his part be that tarrieth by the stuff: they shall part alike. In Greece, " the whole booty was brought to the general, who had the first choice, divided the remainder among those who had signalized themselves, according to their rank and merits, and allotted to the rest equal portions ; thus in the Trojan war, when the captive ladies were to be chosen, Agamemnon, in the first place, took Astynome, the -daughter of Chryses ; next Achilles had Hippodamia, daughter to Brises ; then Ajax chose Tecmessa, and so of the rest; Achilles therefore complains of Agamemnon, that he had always the best part of the booty, while him- self, who sustained the burden of the war, was content with a small piltapce." From the time of David, the Hebrew warriors, as well those who went to the field, as those who guarded the baggage, shared alike; the law is couched in these terms : " As his part is that goeth down to the bat- lie, so shall his part be that tarrieth by the stuff." But a more satisfactory account of the mode in which the spoils of vanquished nations were divided among the Hebrews, is recorded in the book of Numbers. The whole booty taken from the Midianites, was brought before Moses, an'd Eliezer the priest, and the princes of the tribes ; they, by the divine command, divided it into two parts, between the army and the congregation ; of the army's half they took " one soul of five hundred, both of the persons, and of the beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep, and gave it unto Eliezer the priest, for a heave-offering of the Lord ;" and of the congregation's half they took " one portion of fifty, of the persons, of the beeves, of the asses, and of the flocks, of all manner of beasts, and gave them unto the Levites." This law probably continued in force till the captivity ; and according to its provisions, were the spoils of succeeding wars distributed ; for the regulation which David establish- ed, referred only to this question, whether the soldiers, who' from weakness were obliged to remain with the baggage, should have an equal share of the booty, with their brethren in arms who had been engaged. Before the spoils were distributed, the Greeks considered themselves obliged to dedicate a part of them to the gods, to whose assistance they reckoned themselves indebted for them all. This custom, also, they borrowed from the Orientals ; for the Hebrews, in dividing the spoils of Midian, separated a portion for the service of the tabernacle ; and the practice, so reasonable in itself, being imitated by the surroundmg nations, at last found its way into Greece and other countries of Europe. But besides the public offerings of the nation, the soldiers oflen of their own accord, consecrated a partof their spoils to *he God of battles: they had several methods of doing this. ; at cne time they collected them into a heap, and consumed them with fire ; at another, they suspended their offerings in the temples. Pausanias, the Spartan, is re- ported to have consecrated out of the Persian spoils, a tripod to Delphian Apollo, and a statue of brass, seven cubits long, to Olympian Jupiter. The origin of these customs is easily discernible in the manners of the Hebrews. After the rich and various spoils of Midian were divided, the officers of the army, penetrated with gratitude that they had not lost a man in the contest, " presented an oblation to the Lord, jewe]s of gold, chains, and bracelets, rings, ear-rings, and tablets, to make atonement," as they piously expressed it, " for their souls before the Lord." But the city of Jericho and all its inhabitants, except Rahab and her family, were devoted to utter destruction, as an offering to the justice and holiness of God, whom they had incensed by their crimes ; " And the city," said Joshua, " shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the Lord; only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are wath her in the house, because she hid the messengers that Avere sent. . . . But all the silver and gold, and vessels of brass and iron, are consecrated unto the Lord; they shall come into the treasury of the Lord. . . . And they burnt the city with fire, and all that was therein ; only the silver, and the gold, Jhap. 31. 1 SAMUEL. 179 and the vessels of brass and of iron, they put in the treas- ury of the house of the Lord." When the demands of reli- gion were satisfied, the Grecian soldiers commonly reserved articles of extraordinary value which they had obtained, as a present to their a^eneral or commander of their party. To this mark of respect, Deborah perhaps alludes in the words which she puts mto the mouth of Sisera's mother and her attendants : " Have they not sped 1 have they not divided the prey ; to every man a damsel or two ; to Sisera, a prey of divers colours, a prey of divers colours of needle-work, of divers colours of needle-work on both sides, meet for the necks of them that take the spoil." " It has been," says Malcom, " the invariable usage of all Asiatic conquerors, from the monarch who subdues kingdoms, to the chief that seizes a village, to claim some fair females as the reward df his conquest." — Paxton. CHAPTER XXXI. Ver. 8. And it came to pass on the morrow, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen in Mount Gilboa. 9. And they cut off his head, and stripped off his armour, and sent into the land of the Philistines round about, to pub- lish it in the house of their idols, and among the people. It was the practice of ancient warriors to strip the dead bodies of their enemies on the field of battle, after the vic- t'ory was secured, and the pursuit had ceased ; and not sat- isfied with this, they often treated them in the most brutal manner, basely revenging the injuries which they had re- ceived from them while living, by disfiguring their remains, and exposing them to scorn anci ignominy. When the Philistines came to strip the dead that fell in the battle on the mountains of Gilboah, they found Saul and his three sons among the slain. But instead of respecting his rank and valour, they " cut off his head, and stripped off his ar- mour, which they put in the house of Ashtaroth ; and they fastened his body, and the bodies of his sons, to the wall of Beth-shan." Capital oflfenceswere sometimes punished by throwing the criminal upon hooks, which were fixed in the wall below, where they frequently hung in the most ex-, quisite tortures, thirty or forty hours before they expired. It is probable that the bodies of Saul and his sons were fixed to such hooks as were placed there for the execution of the vilest malefactors ; but whatever be in this, it was certainly meant as one of the greatest indignities which they could offer to the remains of an enemy whom they both feared and detested. The ancient Greeks treated the dead bodies of their ene- mies in a manner equally indecent and inhuman. They mangled, dismembered, dragged them about the field of battle, and suffered them to lie unburied for a long time, and even to become the prey of savage beasts and raven- ous fowls. No instance of this kind is more remarkable than that of the brave, the generous, but unfortunate Hector, whose dead body suffered every mdignity which the infuriate rage of Achilles, or the ferocious brutality of his myrmidons, could invent. Nay, the whole army joined in the brutish and barbarous insult ; which shows that it was their constant practice, and regarded as quite consist- ent with virtue and honour. Tydeus is not treated with more respect in Statius; and in Virgil, the body of Mezen- tius is cruelly lacerated, for though he only received two wounds Ironi .^neas, we find his breastp'/ate afterward pierced through in twelve places. These instances, to which many others might be added, prove that it was the common practice of ancient warriors. In the heroic ages too, the conquerors compelled their enemies to pay a large sum of money for permission to bury their dead. Hector's body was redeemed from Achilles ; and that of Achilles was redeemed from the Trojans for the same price he had received for Hector. And Virgil introduces Nisus dis- suading his friend Euryalus from accompanying him into danger, lest, if he were slain, there should be no person to recover by fight, or redeem his body. These statements prove, that it was a common practice in the primitive ages, to redeem the dead body of a warrior ; and if this was neg- lected or refused, it was frequently suffered to remain un- buried. But, in succeeding times, it was considered as the greatest impiety, as the indubitable mark of a savage or ungenerous temper, to deny the rites of burial to an enemy. The more civilized Grecians reckoned it a sacred duty to bury the slain, a debt which they owed to nature ; and they seldom or never neglected it, or refused their permission to pay it, except on extraordinary and unusual provocations. It was a very aggravating circumstance in the desolations of Jerusalem, so feelingly described by the pen of Asaph, that the dead bodies of her inhabitants remained unburied , and the terms in which he mentions it, prove that the He- brews had the same acute feelings, relative to this subject, as the most refined nations of antiquity : " O God, the heathen are come into thine inheritance ; thy holy temple have they defiled ; they have laid Jerusalem on heaps. The, dead bodies of thy servants have they given to be meat unto the fowls of the heaven, the flesh of thy saints unto the beasts of the earth. Their blood have they shed like water round about Jerusalem ; and there was none to bury them." — Paxton. Ver. 10. And they put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth; and they fastened his body to the wall of Beth-shan. Three Bakhtiarees had been condemned to death by the Erince for robbery ; one was beheaded, and the second lown up ; the third weis cut in half, and the two parts of his body hung on two of the most frequented gates of the city as a warning to other thieves. The horrid spectacle was displayed for three days. It illustrates, in some de- gree, an ancient custom exemplified in the case of Saul, 1 Sam. 31. 10, whose body was fastened to the wall of Beth- shan by the Philistines. Shekch-kerden is the technical name for this punishment, which consists in cutting the body in two lengthwise, with a sword, beginning between the legs, and terminating in the side of the neck above the shoulder, — Morier. Ver. 12. All the valiant men arose, and went all night, and took the body of Saul, and the bodies of his sons, from the wall of Beth-shan, and came to Jabesh, and burnt them there. The Chaldeeand other versions render the words, " and they burnt or kindled a light or lamp over them there, as they are accustomed to burn over kings." Upon which a rabbi observes, that this has reference to a custom, deliver- ed down from their ancestors, of burning the beds and other utensils of the dead upon their graves, or to the burning of spices over them. See Jer. xxxiv. 5. — Burdee. THE SECOND BOOK OF SAMUEL. CHAPTER I. Ver. 2. It came even to pass on the third day, that, behold, a man came out of the camp from Saul, with his clothes rent, and earth upon his head : and so it was, when he came to David, that he fell on the earth, and did obeisance. In several passages of scripture mention is made of dust strewed on the head, as a token of mourning, or earth, or ropes carried on the head, as a token of submission. The following instance is remarkably analogous to these acts of humiliation : " He then descended the mountain, carrying, as is the custom of the country, for vanquished rebels, a stone upon his head, as confessing himself guilty of a capi- tal crime." (Bruce.) — Burder. Ver. 10. And I took the crown that ^'^5 upon his head, and the bracelet that was on his arm,* and have brought them hither unto my lord. A bracelet is commonly worn by the oriental princes, as a badge of power and authority. When the calif Cayem Bemrillah granted the investiture of certain dominions to an eastern prince, he sent him letters patent, a crown, a chain, and bracelets. This was probably the reason that the Amalekite brought the bracelet which he found on Saul's arm, along with his crown, to David, It was a royal ornament, and belonged to the regalia of the kingdom. The bracelet, it must be acknowledged, was worn both by men and women of difTerenl ranks ; but the original word, in the second book of Samuel, occurs only in tM'o other places, and is quite different from the term, which is em- ployed to express the more common ornament known by that name. And besides, this ornament was worn by kings and princes in a different manner from their subjects. It was fastened above the elbow ; and was commonly of great value. The people of Israel found the bracelet among the spoils of Midiajij when they destroyed that nation in the time of Moses ; but it will be remembered, that they killed at the same time five of their kings. The prophet Isaiah, indeed mentions the kind of bracelet, which Mr. Harmer considers as the peculiar badge of kings, in his description of. the wardrobe of a Jewish lady, which proves, that in the age when he flourished, it was not the exclusive decoration of regal personages, but had been assumed, and was often worn by persons of inferior rank ; but it is by no means improbable, that the extravagance of the female sex in his time, which seems to have arisen to an unprecedented height, might have confounded, in some measure, the dis- tinctions of rank, by inducing the nobility of Judah to af- fect the state and ornamenrs of their princes. Persons of distinction in various countries of the East, wore chains of silver and gold ; and not satisfied with this, ostentatiously displayed their wealth and rank, by suspending chains of the same precious metals about the necks of their camels. Silver chains, according to Pococke, hung from the bridles of the seven military agas in Egypt, to the breastplates of their horses. The camels of the kings of Midian, whom Gideon discomfited, were, agreeably to this custom, adorn- ed with chains of gold. — Paxton, Margin, " My coat of mail, or my embroidered coat." The marginal reading here probably conveys the true meaning of the Hebrew. Saul, for his personal security, most likely wore a close coat, made of rings, or oilets, in the nature of a coat of mail. Montfaucon {Supplement, vol. iii. p. 397) thus represents a combat between a person on horseback and another on foot. " The horseman, repre- sented on an Etruscan vase, of Cardinal Gualtieri's, is armed in such a sinsrular manner, that I thought it neces- sary to give the figure here. This horseman is mounted on a naked horse, with only a bridle, though the horse seems to have something on his neck, which passes between his two ears, but it is impossible to distinguish what it is. The armour also of this horseman is as extraordinary as that of the Sarmatian horsemen on Trajan's pillar. His military habit is very close, and fitted to his body, and cov- ers him even to his wrist, and below his ancles, so that ?iis feet remain naked, which is very extraordinary. For, I think, both in the ancient and modern cavalry, the feet were a principal part which they guarded: excepting only the Moorish horse, who have for their whole dress only a short tunic, which reaches to the middle of the thigh : and the Numidians, who ride quite naked, upon a naked horse, ex- cept a short cloak which they have, fastened to their neck, and hanging loose behind them, in warm weather, and ■which they wrap about themselves in cold weather. Our Etruscan horseman here hath his feet naked, but he hath his head well covered, with a cap folded about it, and large^ slips of stuff hanging down from it. He m ears a collar of round stones. The close-bodied coat he wears is wrought all over with zigzags, and large points, down to the girdle, which is broad, and tied round the middle of his body ; the same flourishing is continued lower down his habit, quite to his ankle, and' all over his arms, to his wrist." Something similar to this might be the military dress of Saul. — Burder. Ver. 15. And David called one of the young men, and said, Go near, and fall upon him. And he smote him that he died. Others were condemned to be slain with the sword, which was by decapitation, executed in the manner used in mod- ern times. Such was the punishment which David inflict- ed on the Amalekite, for putting Saul to death. It seems also to be the usual punishment in Abyssinia, for taking away the life of a king: for Socinios, an Abj^ssinian mon- arch, being informed that one Mahardin, a Moor, had been the first to break through that respect due to a king, bv wounding Za Denghel, his predecessor, at the baitle of Bartcho, he ordered him to be brought at noonday before the gate of his palace, and his head to be then struck off with an axe, as a just atonement for violated majesty. The punishment of strangling, as described by the Jewish wri- ters, resembled the Turkish punishment of the bowstring, rather than the present mode of executing by the gibbet. The offender Avas placed up to the loins in dung, and a nap- kin was twisted about his neck, and drawn hard by the wit- nesses, till he was dead. Those who had committed great and notorious offences, and who deserved to be made pub- lic examples, were hanged upon a tree after they had actu- ally suffered the death to which they were condemned; which shows, that this punishment was not the same with the Roman crucifixion, in which the malefactors were nailed to the gibbet, and left to expire by slow and excru- ciating torments. The Hebrew custom was no more than hanging up their bodies after they were dead, and expo- sing them for some time to open shame. For this purpose, a piece of timber was fixed in the ground, out of which came a beam, to which the hands of the sufferer were tied, so that his body hung in the posture of a person on the cross. When the sun set, the body was taken down ; for the law says, " He that is hanged on a tree, is accursed of God ;" not that the criminal was accursed because he was hanged, but he was hanged because he was accUrsed.— Paxton. Ver. 12. And they mourned and wept, and fasted until even for Saul, and for Jonathan his son Chap. 1. 2 SAMUEL. 181 and for the people of the Lord, and for the house of Israel ; because they were fallen by the sword. Thus did David, and those that were with him, weep and fast until the evening, because the " mighty were fall- en," and because "the weapons of war" had perished. When a father or mother " falls on the ground," the children have stated periods when they weep and fast in memory of their dead. On the day of the full moon, those who have lost their mothers fast until the sun come to the meridian, and in the evening they take milk and fruit. For a father, the sons fast on the new moon in the same way as for the mother. — Roberts. ■ Ver. 18. (Also he bade them teach the children ofJudah the use of the bow: behold, it is writ- ten in the book of Jasher.) These words have been generally understood of Jona- than teaching the children of Judah the use of the bow. But a better interpretation of the passage, probably is, that the bow is the name of the lamentation which David ut- tered over Jonathan ; and that it is so denominated, because he met his death from the bow. The following extract, describing a funeral procession of women, to commemorate the death of a merchant, named Mahomet, at Cosire, where he was murdered by two Arabs, who attacked him with swords, will illustrate this representation. Speaking of the murder of Mahomet, Mr. Irwin, ( Travels, p. 254,) says, " The tragedy which was lately acted near Cosire, gave birth to a mournful procession of females, which passed through the different streets of Gmnah, and uttered dismal cries for the death of Mahomet, In the centre was a female of his family, who carried a naked sword in her hand, to intimate the weapon by which the deceased fell. At sundry places the procession stopped, and danced round the sword to the music of timbrels and tabours. They paused a long time before our house, and some of the women made threatening signs to one of our servants, which agrees with the caution we received to keep within doors. It would bft dangerous enough to face this frantic company, whose constant clamour and extravagant gestures gave them all the appearance of the female bacchanals of Thrace, recorded of old." From this custom of carrying in the fu- neral procession the weapon by which the deceased met death, it seems likely that the lamentations of David over Jonathan might have been called Tke Bmo, and sung by the men of Judah in funeral procession. — Border. Ver. 21. Ye mountains of Gilboa, let there be no dew, neither let there be rain upon you, nor fields of offerings : for there the shield of the mighty i| vilely cast away. The want of rain in the East is partly compensated by the copious dews which fall in the night, to restore and re- fresh the face of nature. The sacred writers were too much alive to the beauties of nature, too keen and accurate observers of the works and operations of their God, not to avail themselves of this part of the divine arrangements to give us a visible and lively conception of the purity and in- fluence of his blessing. In the sublime benediction which the dying patriarch pronounced on the future inheritance of Jo- seph, the dew occupies a prominent place, clearly indicating its incalculable value in the mind of an Oriental : " And of Joseph he said, blessed of the Lord be his land, for the pre- cious things of heaven, for the dew, and for the deep that coucheth beneath." When the holy Psalmist many ages afterward poured out the sorrows of his heart over the fall- en house of Saul, he deprived the spot where the king and nis sons fell, of the dew, the rain, and the fields of offerings, as the greatest curse which his lacerated feelings could de- vise : " Ye mountains of Gilboa, let there be no dew, nei- ther let there be rain upon you, nor fields of offerings ; for vhere the shield of the mighty is vilely cast awav." So silent. Irresistible, and swift, is the descent of the dew on every field and on every blade of grass, that Hushai, David's "riend, selects it as the most appropriate phenomenon in nature to symbolize the sudden onset of an enemy ; "We will light upon him as the dew falleth on the ground." When the chosen peopk- were scattered among the rivers of Babylon, they resembled a %ld burnt up by the scorch- ing sun ; but the favour and ble^sing of heaven are prom- ised to restore them to the high estate from which they had fallen. " For thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead." Although they were dried and withered as the grass, yet he promises to' revive, refresh, and strengthen them by the power of his spirit and the riches of his grace. The dewdrops of the morning are not more pure and insinuating, more lovely and ornament- al, when they descend on the tender grass, than the doc- trines of inspiration in the heart and conduct of a genuine Christian. This idea is beautifully expressed by Moses in his dying song ; " My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distil as the dew, as the small rain upon the lender herb, and as the showers upon the grass." The mu- tual regard which ought to animate the people of God is compared to the dew which moistens the hill of Hermon and clothes it with verdure. The drops of dew are countless and brilliant, glittering over all the field, cheering the heart of the husbandman, and stimulating his exertions ; not less abundant, illustrious, and encouraging, were the first con- verts to the Christian faith, after the ascension of Christ. That splendid manifestation of almighty grace was cele- brated many ages before in the songs of Zion : " Thy peo- ple shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the rnorning : thou hast the dew of thy youth." But it too frequently happens that the glory of the church, as well as the attainments of her chil- dren, suffers a mournful decline, anjl passes rapidly away: and what emblem more appropriate can be chosen to indi- cate such a change than the sudden evaporation of the dcM^s, by the kindling rays of a vertical sun 1 " O Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee 1 O Judah, w^hat shall I do unto thee 1 for your goodness is as a morning cloud, and as the early dew "it goeth away." The shield was morehighly valued by the ancients than all their other armour. It was their delight to adorn it with all kinds of figures, of birds and beasts, especially those of generous natures, as eagles and lions : they embla- zoned upon its capacious circle the effigies of their gods, the forms of celestial bodies, and all the works of nature. They preserved it with the most jealous care ; and to lose it in the day of battle was accounted one of the greatei-t calamities that could befall them, worse than defeat, or even than death itself; so great was their passion for what i«- termed military glory, and the estimation in which it wa.' held, that they had a profound regard for all sorts of arms the instruments by which they attained it ; and to leave then in the hands of their enemies, to give them for a pledge, o dispose of them in a dishonourable way, was an indelibl- disgrace both in Greece and at 'Rome, for which they coul i hardly ever atone. But these sentiments were, not confined to Greece and Rome ; among no people were they carried higher than among the Jews. To cast away the shield in the day of battle, they counted a national disgrace, and a fit subject for public mourning.. This affecting circum- stance was not omitted in the beautiful elegy which David, a brave and experienced soldier, composed on the death of Saul and the loss of his army : " The shield of the mighty was vilely cast away." On that fatal day, when Saul and the flower of Israel perished on the mountains of Gilboa, many of the Jewish soldiers who had behaved with great bravery in former battles, forgetful of their own reputation and their country's honour, threw away their shields, and fled from the field. The sweet singer of Israel adverts tp that dishonourable conduct, with admirable and touching pathos: " Ye mountains of Gilboa, let there be no dew, neither let there be rain upon you, nor fields of offerings ; for there the shield of the mighty is vilely cast away, the shield of Saui, as though he had not been anointed with oil." The apos- tle has availed himself of this general feeling in his epist'e to the Hebrews, to encourage them in the profession of the gospel, and in a courageous, firm, and constant adherence to the truth : " Cast not away therefore your confidence." Abide without wavering in the profession of the faith, and in the firm belief of the truth ; and aim at the full as- surance of the grace of faith, which, as a spiritual shield, should be sought with unwearied diligence, and retained with jealous care. — Paxton. Ver. 23. Saul and Jonathan icere lovely and •82 2 SAMUEL. Chap 2 pleasant in their lives, and in their death they were not divided : they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions. The military exercises of the Hebrews resembled those of other nations around them. Swiftness of foot was high- ly valued, as it gave the warrior a great advantage over liis slower and more unwieldy antagonist. It is accord- ingly mentioned to the honour of Asahei, one of David's captains, that he was swifter of foot than a wild roe ; and the sweet singer of Israel, in his poetical lamentation over vhose two great captains, Saul and Jonathan, takes partic- ular notice of this warlike quality: " They were sv/iiter than eagles, stronger than lions." Nor were the ancient Greeks less attentive to a qualification which the state of the military art in those days rendered so valuable. The footraces in the Olympic games were instituted by warlike ^^^'eftains, for the very purpose of inuring their subjects to i.ie fatigues of war, and particularly of increasmg their speed, which was regarded as an excellent qualification m a warrior, both because it served for a sudden attack and a nimble retreat. Homer, fully aware of its value in an- cient warfare, says, that swiftness of foot is one of the most excellent endowments with which a man can be favoured. To invigorate the frame, on the strength and firmness of which the victory almost entirely depended in primitive limes, the Hebrew captains are said to have exercised their soldiers in lifting great weights. After the defeat of Saul, which seems to have been chiefly eflfected by the skill and valour of the enemy's archers, David commanded his offi- cers to instruct their troops in the use of the boAv, which, though employed by the Hebrew warriors from the earliest times, appears to have been rather neglected till that terri- ble catastrophe taught them the necessity of forming a body of skilful archers, which might enable them to meet their '"nemies in the field on equal terms. The Hebrew youth were also taught to hurl the javelin, to handle the spear, zmd to use the sling, in which many of them greatly ex- celled. — Paxton. Ver. 26. I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan : very pleasant hast thou been unto me : thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women. Than the love of women ; or, as the word is frequently rendered, wives. This figure hath been censured, as not well chosen, and insinuations dropped highly to the dis- honour of the two noble friends. But the expression gives no countenance to it. It fippears to me, that there was somewhat in the conduct of Michal, David's wife, in too hastily consenting to be married to Phalti, that gave occa- sion to this comparison. It is certain from her behaviour to him, at the bringing the ark to Jerusalem, that she had not that high esteem and affection for him, that she ought to have had, as she took this opportunity so bitterly to reproach him. It is certain also, that her marriage to Phalti must have been preceded by a divorce from David; otherwise her second marriage would have been real adul- tery : and her consenting to. a divorce, though by her father's order, showed great want of affection and fidelity to David. On this supposition, no comparison could be better chosen, nor more tenderly and delicately expressed. The brother's love to him, as a friend, was more generous and constant than the sister's, though a wife. The com- pliment to Jonathan was very high, and just; and the concealing the sister's name, was truly polite. He who can read this excellent composure without admiration and pleasure, must be totally destitute of all true taste. The lamentation over the slain heroes of Israel, in the beginning, and several times repeated; the manner in which he expresses his anguish, at the thought of the defeats being published in the cities of the Philistines, and the triumphs of the daughters of the uncircumcised upon account of it; his passionately wishing that neither dews nor rains might ever fall on the mountains of Gilboa, and the fields surrounding them, in which the slaughter of the Israelites happened; his recounting the past victories of Saul and Jonathan, who never drew a bow, or brandished a sword, but it proved fatal to their enemies, to heighten the glory of their character, and set forth in a more lively manner the sad reverse of their condition ; his comparing them, the one to an eagle for swiftness, the other to a lion for strength and valour ; the honourable mention of their mutual affection while they lived, and dying bravely to- gether in the field of battle; the exclamation to the daugh- ters of Israel to mourn over Saul, and the reasons he gives for it; his celebrating the mutual lender friendship between himself and Jonathan : in a word, this elegy, in every part of it, both in sentiment and expression, hath all the charms with which the spirit of poetry can adcrn it ; shoM^s the richness of David's genius, and will be a monument to his praise throughout all generations. — Chandler. CHAPTER 11. V Ver. 4. And the men of Judah came, and there they anointed David king over the house of Judah. And they told David, saying, That the men of Jabesh-gilead were they thai buried Saul. 5. And David sent messengers unto the men of Jabesh-gilead, and said unto them, Blessed be ye of the Lord, that ye have show- ed this kindness unto your lord, even unto . Saul, and have buried him. 6. And now the Lord show kindness and truth unto you : and I also will requite you this kindness, because ye have done this thing. 7. Therefore now let your hands be strengthened, and be ye val- , iant : for your master Saul is dead, and also the house of Judah have anointed me king over them. 8. But Abner the son of Ner, captain of Saul's host, took Ishbosheth the son of Saul, and brought him over to Mahanaim : 9. And he made him king over Gilead, and over the Ashurites, and over Jezreel, and over Ephraim, and over Benjamin, and over all Israel. 1 0. Ish- bosheth, Saul's son, icas forty years old when he began to reign over Israel, and reigned two years. But the house of Judah followed Da- vid. 11. And the time that David was king in Hebron, over the house of Judah, was seven years and six months. David was now thirty years old ; had in many instances shown his courage, fortitude, moderation, and patience ; had been inured by a long persecution, and series of dis- appointments and distresses, to submission to God, and trust in his power and goodness ; and had experienced the care of the Almighty, in the protection afFqrded him, under the innumerable dangers to which the jealousy and enmity of Saul had exposed him. As he had under all his difli- culties strengthened himself in God, left his fate to the divine disposal, and was determined never to hasten his accession to the throne by any acts of treason and violence ; God now began to reward his singular virtue, and from a fugitive and exile he was made king over the most power- ful of all the tribes, by their unsolicited and voluntary con- sent ; as an earnest of what God had in further reserve for him, — the kingdom over all his people. From hence it appears, how unreasonably it hath been alleged, that David had no pretension to the sovereignty, either by right of in- heritance, which was claimed by Ishbosheth, a remaining son of Saul, nor by popular election, but by the clandestine appointment of an old Levite, which inspired him with hopes, of which by arms and intrigues he obtained the fruition. Mr. Bayle also censures the conduct of David in the measures he took to secure himself the crown. For he informs us, that David had gained the principal men of the tribe of Judah by presents ; and that had not Abner prevented it, there is no doubt but he would have become king over all Israel, by the same method, viz. by gaining the principal persons by presents. It is acknoAvledged that David had no pretension to the sovereignty by right of in- heritance ; and in this respect Saul had no more right than David; nor Isl.nosheth than either of them; the hereditary 1 ight, if any such there was, being vested in Mephiboshetl^ I Chap. 2. 2 SAMUEL. 18S Saul's grandson, b}' his eldest son Jonathan. And, thus, I doubt not, MephiDosheth himself thought ; at least Saul's family certainly did. For when David asked Ziba where Mephibosheth was, Ziba answered : " He abideth at Jeru- salem ; for he said, to-day shall the house of Israel restore me the kingdom of ray father." Whether this charge was true or false, it is evident that Mephibosheth, or his family, thought the right of succession to the kingdom of Israel belonged to him, as it most unquestionably did, if the suc- cession had been made hereditary in Saul's family. Be- sides, if Saul himself, as some affirm, had only the show of a popular election, he had no real" popular election at all, and therefore no right to the crown, and therefore Ishbo- sheth could derive no right from him to succeed him. Ish- bosheth further doth not appear to have had, either the show or reality of a popular election ; no, nor the clandestine appointment of the old Levite, which both Saul and David had. He was the mere creature of Abner, the captain of Saul's host ; who, ambitious of retaining the power in his own hand, took Ishbosheth, and, by military force, made him king over Israel ; without, as far as appears, the choice or consent of the eleven tribes, and in direct opposition to he choice and consent of the tribe of Judah, the most con- siderable and powerful of all, and the inclination of the whole body of the people. Ishbosheth therefore was a usurper in every respect, in prejudice of the right heir ; and David, and "every man in Israel, had a natural right to oppose him, and prevent his establishment in the kingdom. Mr. Bayle says, that David did not pretend that Ishbosheth reigned by usurpation ; for he allowed him to be a righteous man, and therefore a lawful king. But this reasoning will not hold good, if Mr. Bayle's own account of David be true. He allows David to have been one of the greatest men in the world, commends him for his conspicuous piety, and extols him as a son of holiness in the chi^rch. And yet he tells us, that David acted like an infidel, and most ambitious prince ; and that his policy and prudence were such, as he can never persuade himself to think that the strict laws of equity, and the severe morals of a good ser- vant of God can possibly approve ; and that his actions were not those of a samt. I therefore say, that according to Mr. Bayle, a person may have a general character for a saint and a righteous man, and yet, in some particular actions, may act contrary to the character of both ; and that therefore it doth not follow, that because David allowed Ishbosheth to be a righteous man, therefore he allowed him to be a lawful ' king. Ishbosheth was undoubtedly a righteous man, with respect to his murderers, whom he had never injured ; ana probably in his private character he might be a man of virtue. But at the same time David could not but know, that he reigned in every view by usurpation, and that con- sequently he was in this respect a very unrighteous man. The right of David to the crown was indisputable, and the highest by which any man could claim it. When Saul was made king, the crown was not made hereditary in his family, and the same power that made him king, be that what it will, declared, that his kingdom should not stand, or be perpetuated in his family, but be transferred to his neighbour. Upon the death of Saul therefore, the throne oecame vacant, and the people were at full liberty, under the direction of God, to choose whom they pleased. The tribe of Judah unanimously chose David" for their king, and it is highly probable, that the M^hole body of the nation would have fallen in with him, had they not been prevented by the influence of Abner. This Abner himself more than intimates, when in order to bring over the eleven tribes to David, he puts them in remembrance, saying : " Ye fought for David in tinges past to be king over you," viz. even in Saul's time, who was abhorred and detested by many of '.he principal men for his tyranny. Nay, we are expressly mformed, that the princes, and captains of hundreds and thousands, and great parties from the Benjamites, Gib- eonites, Gadites, the tribe of Judah and Manasseh revolted \0 him, even before the battle in which Saul was slain, day by day, till it was a great host, like the host of God. These were voluntary in the offer of the crown to David, and no jtind of bribes or force employed by him to bring them to submission. The whole nation was in motion, and nothing prevented their unanimously declaring for him, but the opposition of Abner in favour of Ishbosheth. . But did not David gain in particular the tribe of Judah Jfr bribes or presents 1 Mr. Bayle affirms he did : The whole tribe of Judah, of which he had gained the principu men by presents, acknowledged him for king. The histor~ only says, that he once made presents to such of the elders of Judah, as were his friends, consisting of part of the spoil he took from the Amalekites, after the recovery of the prej" they had taken from Ziklag ; and probably that very part which the Amalekites had taken from Judah, the south o which they had just invaded. But if these elders of Judah were his friends, before he sent them this present, then he did not gain them by sending them these presents, and their making him king was not because he made them a pres- ent, but from the greatness of their affection for him before. When Mr. Bayle adds, there is no doubt, had not Abner prevented it, but he would have been king of all Israel, by the same method of presents ; I think there is great reason to doubt of it ; for David doth not appear to have been in circumstances to give .such presents ; nor did they seem to desire or want them, being led by their own inclinations and sense of interest and duty at last to submit to him. David was certainly a man of a generous disposition, and liberal in his favours ; and this temper I never so much as suspected to be criminal, unworthy a great and good prince, or a real saint ; and if by a prudent liberality he could se- cure his own rights, I think he acted much more like a saint, than if he had recovered them by force, without ever first attempting to do it by the gentler methods of liberality and goodness. The true reason of the tribe of Judah's falling in with him, and the readiness of the other tribes to acknowledge him as king, was his excellent character as a brave and generous soldier, under whom they them- selves had formerly served ; and especially his designation by God to the royal dignity, having been anointed king by Samuel, according to the express order of God. It was this latter consideration, that led him to ask the divine direc- tion upon Saul's death, what measures he should take to secure his succession. The very question : " Shall I go up to any of the cities of Judah 1 would have been highly indecent, had he not had the divine promise and assistance to depend on. His claim, by virtue of Samuel's unction, was his only claim, was universally known to the people oi Israel, and the avowed reason why they at last advanced him to the throne. It was known to Jonathan his friend. Saul himself was no stranger to it. I know, says he, that thou shalt be surely king, and that the kingdom of Israel shall be established in thy hand. It was known even to private persons. Nabal's wife confesses this appointment of God. Abner terrified Ishbosheth by putting him in mind of it. " So do God to Abner, and more also, except, as the Lord hath sworn to David, even so I do to him, to translate the kingdom from the house of Saul, and to set up the throne of David over Israel." He declares the same in his message to the elders of Israel. The Lord hath spoken of David, saying, " By the hand of my servant David I will save my people Israel out of the hands of the Philistines, and out of the hand of all their enemies." And when they came to make him king, this was the grand inducement to it. " In time past, when Saul was king over us, thou wast he that leddest out and broughtest in Israel, and the Lord said to thee: Thou shalt feed my people Israel, and thou shalt be captain over Israel ; and they anointed David king over Israel, according to the word of the Lord by Samuel." So that this was the foundation of his claim, was univer- sally known, and justified his pretensions to, and contest for, the crown after the death of Saul. To this contest David was forced, by Ishbosheth's usur- pation, supported by the authority arid influence of Abner, a near relation of Saul, and who had been his general. Ii lasted above seven years, and Mr. Bayle is extremely dis- pleased with poor David, and censures him very severely on this account. He says, " That as Abner preserved by his fidelity eleven whole tribes for Ishbosheth, the same thing happened as would have happened between two infidel and most ambitious princes. David and Ishbosheth made inces- sant war on one another, to try which of the two could get the other's share, in order to enjoy the whole kingdom with- out division." But the real question, by which David's con- duct is to be determined, is : Did the free election of the tribe of Judah, neither bought by bribes, nor forced by power, give David a right to be king over it ; and did his appointment by God to succeed Saul, and rule over all Israel, give him a just claim to enjoy the whole kingdom, without division 1 I think in both cases he had an indisputable right, and consequent 1 84 2 SAMUEL. Chap. ly he might, consistently even with the character of a saint, defend and maintain his right. Ishbosheth therefore, by keeping David out of part of the kingdom, and endeavour- ing by arms to dispossess him of the whole, might well enough deserve Mr. Bayle's character of an infidel and ambitious prince ; and David, endeavouring only to secure what he had, and to recover what he was unjustly kept out of, may still pass for a very good believer, and doth not seem to have had any more ambition in him, than what was honourable and virtuous. If wars are in their nature ■Liilawful, David's character as a saint will greatly suffer by his carrying on the war with Ishbosheth. ' But it wars are in any case lawful, it must be when waged for supporting those just and important rights, which cannot be secured without them. Such were certainly the rights of David, and therefore his maintaining the war against Ishbosheth, was both his interest and duty, and doth not in the least di- minish the glory of this son of holiness in the church. The promise of God to David, that he should |ge king of Israel, was not a promise to make him so by extraordinary and miraculous methods, but in the use of all prudential and proper ones ; and if he actually employed arms when ne- cessary to vindicate his just claims, and prudence and pol- icy to turn every event to his advantage, it only shows that he was born for empire, worthy of a kingdom, and a man after God's own heart ; or fit for the purposes for 'vhich God raised him to the throne. And though these methods should have been, to all appearance, like those which wicked men, or infidel and most ambitious princes, make use of to obtain their ends, they may for all that be very just and honourable. For infidel and wicked princes may sometimes pursue lawful ends, and be forced to main- tain their rights by policy and arms. And therefore unless the means which David used were base and criminal, or employed for wicked and unjustifiable purposes, they may be allowed to be, to external appearance, the same with what wicked, ambitious, infidel princes use, and yet be agreeable to the rules of justice and honour. — Chandler. Ver. 5. And David sent messengers unto the men of Jabesh-g-ilead, and said unto them, Blessed he ye of the Lord, that ye have showed this kindness unto your lord, even unto Saul, and have buried him. The bodies of Saul and his sons were burnt by the men of Jabesh-gilead. Two of the thirty-two charities of the Hindoos are, to burn the bodies of those whose relations cannot do it, and to pay for the beating of the tom-toms to the place of burning. It is therefore considered a work of great merit to perform the funeral rites for a respectable stranger, or for those whose relations are not able to meet the expenses. Hence may be seen the funerals of those who have lived in poverty, or who have seen better days, conducted with great pomp, because the reward is great to him who advances the money, and because he receives great praise from the people.— Roberts. Ver. 9. And Joab said to Amasa, Art thou in health, my brother ? And Joab took Amasa by the beard with the right hand to kiss him. Dr. Shaw takes no notice of their taking hold of the beard in order to kiss, but Thevenot does, saying, that among the Turks it is a great affront to take one by the beard „ unless it be to kiss him, in which case they often do it. Whether he means by kissing him, kissing his beard, or no* I do not know; but Joab's taking Amasa by the be{ Tf s iiss htm, 2 Sam. xx. 9, seems to be designed to express his taking his beard to kiss it ; at least this is agreeable to the customs of those that now live in that country ; for D' Ar vieux, describing the assembling together of several of the petty Arab princes at an entertainment, tells us, that " All the "emirs came just together a little time after, accompanied by their friends and attendants, and after the usual civilities, caresses, kissings of the beard, and of the hand, which every one gave and received ac- cording to his hand and dignity, they sat down upon mats." He elsewhere speaks of the women's kissing their husbands' beards, and children those of their fathers, and friends reciprocally saluting one another in this manner ; but the doing it by their emirs more exactly answers this history- of Joab and Amasa, and in this stooping posture he could much better see to direct the blow, than if he had only hel^ his beard, and raised himself to kiss his face. — Harmbr. Ver. 18. And there were three sons of Zeruiali there, Joab, and Abishai, and Asahel ; an^ Asahel was as light of foot as a wild roe. The name of the antelope in the Hebrew scripture, '^3 >3s {tsehif) and in the version of the Seventy Aop^caj, {dorcas. In our version, the original term is translated roe and roe buck; but Dr. Shaw, and others, have proved by severa. conclusive arguments, that it is not the roe, but the ante- lope, which the sacred writers intend. The former is extremely rare in the oriental regions, while the latter is common in every part of the Levant. But is it to be sup- posed, that the sacred writers would borrow their figures from creatures which are either not known at all in Pales- tine and the surrounding countries, or but rarely seen , while they had not even a name for an animal, which, in large herds of several thousands, fed in their fields, and around their dwellings 1 Such a supposition would con- tradict some of the strongest laws which regulate the operations of the human mind, and is therefore quiie inadmissible. It is equally absurd to suppose that tbe Jewish legislator, when he regulated by fixed laws the food of his people, would mention a creature which tlicy probably had never sf^en, of which perhaps they had not even heard, which was not to be found in the deserts ovei which they had to travel, nor in the country they were to possess ; while he omitted one of daily occurrence, which • was found everywhere, in the wilderness and in the culti- vated field, on the mountains and in the plains ; whose flesh was greatly esteemed, and, by consequence, could not fail to become an important article of subsistence. These considerations are of themselves sufiicient to establish the superior claims of the antelope to a place in the sacred volume. The arguments which have been drawn from the etymological meaning of the Hebrew terms n3s and "«3s, and the authority of the Septuagint, although of infe- , rior importance, are not destitute of weight. The first of these names suggests the idea of a very gregarious animal ; but this is not the character of the roes, for, instead of a.s.so- ciating in herds, they live in separate families; while the antelopes are commonly found in very large herds, some- times to the number of two or three thousand together. * The second term, '>dx, primarily signifies beauty ; and when put for the concrete, as in this instance, by a very common figure of speech in Hebrew, has the force of a superlative, and signifies a thing or animal of uncommon beauty. Thus the land of Canaan is, in the prophet, styled ■'Sxn pN, the land of beauty; or, as it is rendered by oiir translators, the glory of all lands. The tscbi, therefore, is an animal that excels in beauty ; which exactly corresponds with all the accounts that natural historians have given us of the ante- lope. Both the roe and the antelope, it must be admitted, are, in the general opinion of mankind; very beautiful animals; but the preference is commonly given to the latter. Buffon says, the figure of the small antelopes is elegant, and their members are finely proportioned to their size ; and make prodigious bounds. The Septuagint uni- formly translate the terms, n3s and ""^x, by r^o^^-af ; and tlie correctness of their translation is attested by Luke, for he mentions " a certain disciple" who resided " at Joppa, named Tabitha, which, by interpretation, is called Dorca.«:." The name Tabitha is formed by a slight alteration from the Chaldee noun n-'^i: ( Tabia,) and this from the Hebrew term ^yi (tsebi.) The Hebrew term signifies, as has been already observed, a creature of surpassing beauty ; Dorcas, its divinely attested equivalent, limiting somewhat the general signification, denotes a creature remarkable foi the fineness of its eves; and from this last circumstance, it is conjectured that Tabitha received her name. But while the eyes of the roe have attracted no -particular attention, so far as the writer has observed, the antelope has been celebrated for the fineness of its eyes in all the countries of the East. Their beauty, according to Dr. Shaw, is pro- verbial there to this day ; and it is still the greatest com- pliment which, in these countries, can be paid to a fine Avoman, to sav, " You have the eyes of an antelope." From Bochart, and" other authors, we learn that it was equal}}' • Chap. 3. 2 SAMUEL. 185 celebrated by the ancients for the acuteness of its vision ; its eyes, they pretend, never become bleared ; it sees in the dark ; it sleeps with both eyes open, or, as others will have it, with one eye open and another shut. These circum- stances appear to be much more applicable to the antelope, which is a quadruped well known, than to the roe, which is either not known at all, or very rare, in those parts of the world. The natives of Syria make a distinction be- tween the antelopes of the mountain, and those of the plain. Dr. Russel, who gives us this information, says, "the former is the most beautifully formed, its back and sides are of a dark brown colour, and it bounds with surprising agility ; the latter is of a much lighter colour, its limbs are not so cleanly turned, and it is neither so strong, nor so active ; both, however, are so fleet, that the greyhounds, though reckoned excellent, cannot, without the aid of the falcon, come up with them, except in soft deep ground." This is probably the reason, that the sacred writers fre- quently mention the " antelope upon the mountains," and not siinply the antelope, when they allude to surpassing beauty of form, or amazing rapidity of motion. The swiftness of this beautiful creature, has been celebrated by writers of every age, in terms of high admiration. Its exquisite symmetry, its active form, and the delicate turn of its limbs, clearly show, that it is intended by its Maker to hold a distinguished place among the fleetest animals that scour the desert. Sir John Malcom says, it may be termed the fleetest of quadrupeds. It seems rather to vanish, than to run from the pursuer, and when closely pressed, bounds with so great agility, that it hardly seems to touch the ground in its career. Oppian calls it the swiftest species of goat; and according to ^Elian, it equals the whirlwind in speed. He outruns the antelope, said the Arabians, when they wished to pay the highest compliment to the youthful warrior. To this trait in its character, the sacred writers often allude. The surprising agility which Asahel, the brother of Jdab, displayed in his pursuit of Abner, drew this eulogium from the sacred historian : " And Asahel was light of foot, as one of the antelopes that are in the field." Another allusion to the amazing speed of that animal, occurs in the description of the warlike qualifications which distinguished a troop of Gadites in the service of David : " They were men of might, men of war, fit for the battle, that could handle shield and buckler, whose faces were like the faces of lions, and were as swift as' the roes (the antelopes) upon the mountains." — Paxton. Ver. 28. So Joab blew a trumpet, and all the peo- ple stood still, and pursued after Israel no more, neither fought they any more. See on 2 Sam. 18. 16. CHAPTER III. Ver. 12. And Abner sent messengers to David on his behalf, saying, Whose is the land ? saying I also, Make thy league with me, and, behold, my hand shall be with thee, to bring about all Israel unto thee. Though Abner, with the eleven tribes, asserted Ishbo- sheth's cause for several years, yet he saw that his interest greatly declined, and that he should not long be able to support him, as his forces were worsted in every rencoun- ter; while David prospered in all his affairs, his party li was continually increasing, and every thing seemed to con- j spire to crown his wishes, and soon put him in possession of the kingdom over all Israel. This was the opportunity that Abner had waited for, to bring about that revolution in favour of David, which he had continually in his view, and was determmed to effect, upon the first occasion that : presented itself. He soon found one, that he immediately closed with. Saul had a concubine, whose name was Ris- pah, and Ishbosheth, having found out that Abner had been too intimate with her, took an oppo'tunity to reproach him on that affair, and with an air of displeasure said to him : i Why hast thou gone in unto my father's concubine 1 Ab- ■ ner, enragsd to be thus called to an account, said to Ish- i bosheth with indignation: " What, am I to be used in so 1 contemptuous and disagreeable a manner, as tho'iffh I * (iamru,) rendered, they said, in this sentence is very properly future ; as Hebrew verbs in that tense are known to be frequentative, or to express the con- tinuance of doin^ anything; and therefore that tense is with great propriety used here to express the frequent repetition of the insolent speech used by the blind and the lame upon the walls j^f the fortress. It only remains here to make an observation or two on the reward proposed by David, and the person who obtained it. The text of Chron- icles tells us, " David said. Whosoever smiteth the Jebu- sites first, shall be chief and captain, or head and prince." We are to recollect, that Joab the son of Zeruiah (David's sister) had been general of his army, during the civil war, I between the men of Judah under David, and the Israelites commanded by Abner, in favour of Ishbosheth the son of Saul: but that the Israelites, having now submitted to 'David, he was king over the whole twelve tribes. David, we know, frequently endeavoured to remove Joab from his command of the army, on account of his haughtiness, and for several murders ; but complained, that this son of Zeruiah was too hard for him. One of these attempts of David seems to have been made at the time Israel came iii to David, by the persuasion of Abner ; when it is probable the condition on Abner's side was to have been made David's captain-general: and perhaps Joab suspected so much, and therefore murdered him. The next attempt seems to have been made at the taking this strong citadel of the Jebusites. For David proposes the reward absolute- ly to every officer of his army, "Whosoever smiteth the Jfbusiies first ;" i. e. whosoever will ascend first, put him- self at the head of a detachment, and march up through the subterraneous passage into the citadel, shall be head and captain. This proposal, we may observe, was general; and yet, how much soever David might wish Joab safely removed, it is reasonable to think that he made Joab the first offer. And, we find, that however dangerous and dreadful this enterprise appeared, yet Joab hsd prudence enough to undertake it, and courage enough to execute it : and Joab went up first, or at the head of a party, and was accordingly declared head, or chief captain, or (in the modern style) captain-general of the united armies of Israel and Judah. It is not unlikely that the men of Israel ex- pected, that though Abrfer their general had been basely murdered by Joab, yei David's chief captain should be chosen from among them; or at least that they should have a chance for that iirst post of honour, as well as the men of Judah. And if they had declared any expectation of this kind, David seems to have taken the wisest step for de- termining so important a point — by declaring, that neither relation, nor fortune, nor friendship should recommend upon the occasion ; but, as the bratest man and the best soldier ought to be commander-in-chief, so this honour should be the reward of the greatest merit; that there was nowa fair opportimity pfsignalizingthemselves inthe taking this important fortress; and therefore his resolution was— that Whosoever v-ould head a detachment up this subterra- neous passage, and should first make himself master of the citadel, by that passage, or by scaling the walls, or by any other method, should be head and captain, i. e. captain- general. It is remarkable, that the text in Samuel is very incomplete in this place: David's proposal to the army is just begun, and a circumstance or two mentioned ; but "the reward proposed, and the person rewarded, are totaJv omitted. We may presume the text coiild not have been thus imperfect originally, since no ellipsis can supply Avhat is here wanting; and therefore the words in the coinciding chapter in Chronicles, which regularly fill up this omis- sion, were doubtless at first also in Samuel, and are there- fore to be restored : the necessity of thus restoring the words not found in the present copies of Samuel is ap- parent. And the English version of these texts in Samuel is — " And they spoke unto David, saying. Thou shalt liot come hither ; for the blind and the lame shall keep thee ofl^, by saying, David shall not come hither. But David took the strong hold of Sion, which is the city of David. And Da- vid said on that day. Whosoever (first) smileth the Jebusites,^ and by the subterraneous passage reacheth the blind and tho" lame, which are hated of David's soul, (because the blind and the lame continued to say. He shall not come into this house) — shall be head and captain. So Joab the son of Zeruiah went up first, and was head — or captain-general."' The English version, then, of these texts in Chronicles is — " And the inhabitants of Jebus said to David, Thou shalt not come hither. But David took the strong hold of Sion, which is the city of David. And David said, Whosoever first smiteth the Jebusites, shall be head and captain. So Joab the son of Zeruiah went up first, and was chief cap- tain." (Kennicott.) — Critica Biblica. Ver. 9. So David dwelt in the fort, and called it, The city of David : and David built round about, from Milo and inward. The old city founded by the Jebusites before Abraham arrived in Canaan, is styled by some writers the city ot Melchizedek, not because he was the founder, but because it was the seat of his government. This ancient city was so strongly fortified both by nature and art, that the people of Israel could not drive oiit the Jebusites, its original inhabit- 192 2 SAMUEL. Chap, 5. ants, but were reduced to live with them at Jerusalem, The armies of Israel indeed seized the city ; but the Jebu- sites kept possession of the strong fort which defended the town, till the reign of David, who took it by storm, and changed its name to the city of David, to signify the im- portance of the conquest, and to perpetuate the memory of the event. Having chosen Jerusalem for the place of his residence and the capital of his kingdom, he adorned the fortress with a royal pahice for his own accommodation, and a variety of other buildings; which, from the continual additions made to them in succeeding reigns, increased to the size of a considerable city, and covered nearly the whole of mount Sion. The largeness of the city of David may be inferred from the expression of the sacred histo- rian ; "David built round about from Millo and inward." This passage, and particularly the word Millo, has greatly exercised the genius and divided the sentiments of com- mentators; and is therefore entitled to more particular notice. Thai Millo was situated in the city of David, the inspired historian expressly asserts : and by consequence, it must either have been upon mount Sion or in its immedi- ate vicinity. It is worthy of notice, that the inspired writer of David's history could not allude to Millo itself, which was not then in existence, but to the place where it after- ward stood ; for Millo was not built till the succeeding reign. It seems to have been a public building, where the king and his princes met in council about affairs of state ; for in the passage already quoted from the first book of Kings, it is connected with the house of the Lord and the royal palace. The words of the historian are ; " And this is the reason of the levy (or tax) which king Solomon raised ; for to build the house of the Lord and his own house, and Millo, and the wall of Jerusalem, and Hazor, and Megiddo, and Gezer." But every ground of hesitation is removed by the sacred writer of the second book of Kings, who calls it expressly " the house of Millo." That it was a public building, in one of whose apartments the council of state met to deliberate upon public affairs, is rendered extremely probable by one of the kings of Judah losing his life there by the hands of his princes ; for we are told, that " the servants of king Joash arose and made a conspiracy, and slew him in the house of Millo," whither he had prob- ably come to consult with his princes and other principal persons upon some affairs of state. This interpretation is greatly strengthened by a passage in the book of Judges, which informs us, that " all the men of Shechem gathered together, and all the house of Millo, and went and made Abimelech king." The city of Shechem then had also its house of Millo, and a great number of persons connected with it, whom the sacred writer distinguishes from the men of the city. Now since both were concerned in making Abimelech king, it is natural to conclude, that the men of the city were the inferior inhabitants, and the house of Millo tlie governors of the place : both of whom on this occasion met in the senate-house, to set the crown upon the head of their favourite. The house of Millo upon mount Sion, appears to have been a place of great strength, and essentially connected ;vith the defence of Jerusalem ; fof when Hezekiah dis- covered that Sennacherib meditated the reduction of his capital, " he strengthened himself, and built up all the Avail that was broken, and raised it up to the towers, and another wall without, and repaired Millo in the city of David, and made darts and shields in abundance." From the intimate connexion between the repairing of Millo and the making of darts and other implements of war, it has been conjec- tured by some writers, that one part of that public building was occupied as an armory; in which there is nothing improbable. It is necessary, however, before leaving this part of the subject, to state another opinion that has been advanced concerning Millo, by several men of genius and learning. They suppose that Solomon filled up a deep val- ley or hollow, that separated the hill of Sion and the site of the ancient city from mount Moriah, upon whose sum- mit he built the temple of Jehovah, and made a plain level road from the one to the other. The execution of this stu- pendous work, they contend, may be inferred from the root of the word Millo, which signifies "to fill up;" and from a passage in 2d Chronicles, where it is said, the king made terraces to the hou'^e of the Lord, and to the king's palace. The word which is here rendered terraces, may be translated as in the margin, stays or supports. But nei- ther of these senses amounts to a sufficient proof, that the teri'aces were made by filling up the hollow between mount Sion and mount Moriah. That Solomon planned and ex- ecuted a noble and magnificent way from the royal palace on mount Sion, to the temple on mount Moriah, which excited the admiration of all that saw it, is attested in plain terms by the sacred writer; "And when the queen ot Sheba had seen all Solomon's wisdom, and the house which he had built, . . , and his ascent by which he went up unto the house of the Lord, there was no more spirit in her." This passage also proves, that although the declivity on each side was easy, the road was not perfectly level, for Solomon went up an ascent to the house of the Lord. The same circumstance is mentioned in another book, where the sa- cred writer speaks of " the causey of the going up." And we read, that Joash was slain in the house of Millo, which goes down to Silla. The term Silla, is thought by some learned commentators, to have the same meaning as Mes- silah, which signifies a causey or cast up way ; and conse- quently, that between the two mounts Sion and Moriah, were two declivities, one towards the temple or moxmt Moriah, the other towards the palace or mount Sion. The last is supposed to be the descent of Silla, near which stood the house of Millo. From this statement it is clear, that the house of Millo stood on the east side of mount Sion, at the upper end of the causey which goes down to Silla, and the royal palace on the opposite side. When, therefore, the sa- cred historian says, David built round about from Millo and inward, or as the original word may be rendered, " to the house," he seems to intimate, that I)avid built round about from the place where Millo was afterward erected by Solomon, or where more probably the senate-house, or Millo of the Jebusites, had stood, which was pulled down to make room for the more sumptuous edifice of Solomon, to his own house ; so that David built from one part of mount Sion, quite round to the opposite point. Hence, the resi- dence of David, even in the reign of that renowned mon- arch, began to assume the size and splendour of a city, and to be justly entitled to the appellation which it receives from the sacred historian. — Paxton, Ver. 19. And David inquired of the Lord, say- ing-, Shall I go up to the Philistines ? wilt thou deliver them into my hand? And the Lord said unto David, Go up ; for I will doubtless deliver the Philistines into thy hand. I cannot here help observing, in honour of the Hebrew oracle, that its answers were such, as became the character of the true God, who hath all events at his disposal, and cannot be mistaken as to those which he expressly fore- tels. Let any one compare it with the heathen oracles, and he will be forced to acknowledge, that they were shuffling, ambiguous, and vague ; and the answers they gave of so uncertain a nature, so equivocal and deceitful, as that they might be interpreted in two direct contrary senses, might be equally true of two contrary events, and evidently demonstrated, that they who gave them out kncAv no more of those events on which they were consulted, than they who inquired about them, who were often deceived in the application of them to their own destruction. Thus Croe- sus was foretold by Apollo, that if he made war with the Persians, he should overturn a great empire ; which Croesus interpreting in his own favour, made war upon Cyrus, and thereby put an end to his own empire ; after which, he severely reproached Apollo for deceiving him. And j thus Pyrrh'us, king of Epirus, who is said, upon the credit \ of an ambiguous oracle of the same Apollo, to have en- gaged in war with the Romans, was entirely defeated by them, and forced at last to retire with great disgrace and loss into his OAvn dominions. Whereas, the answers of the Hebrew oracle had one plain obvious certain meaning, that needed no interpretation, that no one could possibly mistake the meaning of, and that was never found, in one single instance, to deceive or disappoint those who de- pended on, and directed themselves by the order of it. Do this, or, Do not this, was the peremptory form, in which they, who consulted it, were answered ; which, in the judgment of Cicero, was the manner in which the rrscles of Gcv'> ought to be delivered.— Chandler. Ghap. 6. 2 SAMUEL. 193 CHAPTER VI. Ver. 2. And David arose, and went with all the people that were with him from Baale of Ju- dah, to bring up from thence the ark of God, whose name is called by the name of The Lord of Hosts, that dwelleth between the cherubims. David being now at rest, in peace at home, and free from rfll foreign wars, applied himself to make some necessary regulations in religion, and a proper provision for the more stated performance of the solemnities of divine worship. The ark, which was the emblem of the divine presence, where God dwelt between the cherubim, v/as now at Kir- jath-jearim, in the house of Abinidab on the hill ; where it was placed, when the Philistines had sent it back, after they had taken it in the battle, in which Hophni and Phin- eas, the sons of Eli, perished, and great part of the Hebrew army were cut off. The time of its continuance here was about forty-six years, except when, on some particular oc- casions, it was removed, as once in Saul's time, when he fought his first battle against the Philistines. As David had now fixed his own residence at Jerusalem, and intend- ed it for the capital of his whole kingdom, he was resolved to do every thing in his power, that could contribute to the splendour, dignity, and safety of it. His first care was to secure it the presence and protection of the God of Is- rael ; and accordingly, he provided a proper habitation and residence for his ark, and pitched for it a tent, where it might continually remain throughout all future ages. The ark was a small chest, made of shittim-wood, two cubits and a half, or a yard and a half and one inch long, a cubit and a half, or two feet nine inches broad, and overlaid within and without, with pure gold. On the top of the ark was placed a seat, or cover, called mDn, O^acrrr^piov, the mer- cy-seat, as we render the word, or, the propitiatory cover, be- cause the blood of the propitiatory sacrifice was sprinkled on, and before it. In this ark were placed the two tables of stone, on which the ten commandments were engraven, called the testimony ; because God testified and declared, these ten commandments were essential and unalterable laws of his kingdom. On this account* the ark is called, The ark of the testimony. In the order to make it, God . says : " Let them make me a sanctuary, that I may dwell among them." Here, God tells Moses : " I will meet with thee, and I will commune, with thee, from above the mercy- seat, from between the two cherubims, of all things, which I will give thee in commandment, unto the children of Is- rael; and I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy-seat." Hence the ark was considered as the house, the sanctuary, and temple of God, where he resided; and God is described as dwelling between, or rather above the cherubim ; not because the Hebrews were so stupid as to imagine any per- sonal residence of God in the ark, or that he could be con- fined to any particular place, whom they well knew the heaven, even the heaven of heavens, could not contain ; much less any house that could be erected for him by hu- man hands; but because the cloud and glory, which ap- peared there, were the visible emblems of his gracious presence with them, and of his peculiar inspection and care ov«r them ; or, as Joshua tells them, whereby they should know, that the living God was among them, even the Lord of the whole earth ; viz. to protect and prosper them. That the majesty of this ark or portable temple of God, might be preserved inviolable, God ordered a tabernacle to be prepared for its reception, and a veil to be placed before the ark, to separate the holy place, where the ark was fix- ed, from the other part of the tabernacle, where Aaron and his sons were to minister continually before God. Besides this, there was a spacious court prepared round about the tabernacle and the altar, where the congregation were al- lowed to enter, and present their offerings at the door of the tabernacle, before the Lord. At the door of the tabernacle of the congregation the daily burnt-offering was to be of- ■ fared, where God promised to meet with the children of Is- S rael, to sanctify it by his glor}"-, and to dwell among the fl children of Israel, and be their God, i. e. their almighty guardian, and protector. Here also were to be brought all their various kinds of sacrifices, in reference to which the charge was so strict, as that God commanded, that whoever didnot bring hissacrifice to the door of the tabernacle, there to offer it to the Lord, should be cut off from his people : the most effectual provision this, that could possibly be made against idolatry, as it struck at the root of all idol worship ; and which, had they observed the command, must have prevented the introduction of any other god, in opposition to Jehovah, the true God, who dwelt in the ark, and on whose altar their sacrifices must have been offered by his priests, who resided in the tabernacle. Hither also, as lo the temple of God, the religious Hebrews loved to resort, not only to present their sacrifices, but to join in the cele- bration of the divine praises, and the singing those sacred songs, that were composed in honour of the true God, to offer up their supplications to him, and to make and pay their vows before him ; and their appearance at the taber- nacle for these purposes, where the ark of tTie presence re- sided, was styled, appearing before God, coming before his presence, frequenting his courts, abiding in his house, and the like ; because they saw there his power and glory, or the glorious manifestartion of his power and majesty, which were frequently given, as the immediate token of God's ac- cepting their sacrifices, thanksgivings, and prayers. From these observations it appears, that this ark of God was of the highest importance in the Hebrew republic, as it was a standing memorial for Jehovah, the one true God, the God of Israel, the centre of all the public solemnities of religion, the place where the whole nation was to pay their homage and adoration to him, where he appeared propitious and favourable to his people, where they were to inquire of him, and wait for his direction ; and that the presence of it was essentially necessary, wherever the public solemni- ties of worship were to be performed ; and that Jerusalem could never have been fixed on for these sacred services, nor the visible emblems of the divine Majesty and pres- ence, in the cloud and glory, have ever been expected in it, unlessthis ark had been translated to, and settled there, as the place of its future and fixed residence. These were some of the considerations that induced David to remove it into the new city that he had built, but there were others also that the very law of Moses suggested to him. God had by him commanded the Hebrews, that " unto the place which the Lord their God had chosen out of all the tribes, to put his name there, even unto his habitation should they seek, and thither they should come, and thither should they bring their burnt ofierings, their sacrifices, their tithes and heave offerings, their vows, their free-will offerings, and the firstlings of their herds and flocks, and that there they should eat before the Lord their God, and rejoice in all that they put their hand to, they and their household, wherein the Lord their God had blessed them." He further prom- ised them, that after they had passed over Jordan, and dwelt in the land, which" he had given them to inherit ; then, " there should be a place, which the Lord their God would choose, to dwell tkere, and that there they should bring their burnt-offerings, and all their choice vows, and that there they should rejoice before the Lord their God, they, and their sons, and their daughters, and their men- servants, and their maid-servants, and the Levite that was with them in their gates, and do all that he commanded them;" and that here, and nowhere else, they should eat the passover, and appear three times in it every year, before the Lord their God ; at the feast of unleavened bread, the feasts of weeks, and the feast of tabernacles ; and that here they were to apply for determining their principal causes and. controversies": in a word, that this very place, which the Lord should ehoose, should be the capital of the whole kingdom, the principal seat of all their public solemnities, and the perpetual residence of the supreme courts of justice and equity. During all the preceding periods of the Hebrew republic, no such place had been chosen and appointed by God ; the ark itself had no settled and fixed habitation, but removed from place to place, as convenience or necessity required ; and the several judges and supreme officers, that presided over and judged the people, had their particular cities, where they resided, and administered justice to those who applied to them. In this unsettled state of the republic, many and great inconveniences must have necessarily arisen, and the most significant and important solemnities of the national religion were absolutely incapable of being performed, according to the prescription of the law of God by Moses. 194 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 6. The honour of making the necessary settlement in these things, and perfecting the civil polity, and the ceremonial of the Hebrew worship, was reserved for David; who when he had retaken Jerusalem from the Jebusites, had considered the strength and convenience of its situation, had enlarged it with new buildings, adorned it with pal- aces, erected a magnificent one for himself, had well forti- fied it wath walls and bulwarks, and chosen it for his own residence; was in hope that this was the place God had now chosen to dwell in, and immediately formed the great design of translating the ark of God into it, and providing a suitable habitation for its future rest; that this emblem of God's immediate presence might be perpetually near him, where he himseli might constantly worship in the courts of his tabernacle, where all the solemn sacrifices might be statedly oifered, and the aflfairs in general of the whole kingdom, relating to religion and justice, for the future, be transacted with regularity, order, and dignity. In pursu- ance of this great design, he first gathered together all the chosen men of Israel, thirty thousand men, consisting of the captains of thousands, and hundreds, and all the princes ; and said to them, thus assembled at Jerusalem : " II it seem good unto you, and it be approved of by the Lord our God, let us send abroad unto our brethren everywhere, that are left in all the land of Israel, and with them to the priests and Levites which are in their cities and suburbs, that they may gather themselves together unto us, and let us bring up to us the ark of God ; at which we but seldom inquired in the days of Saul." To this proposal the congregation unanimously agreed. David accordingly sent messengers to Israel, throughout all his dominions, from Sichor, or the Egyptian Nile, the most southern boundary of his king- dom, to the entrance of Hemath. northward, near the rise of Jordan. When the assembly were met, David led them to Baalah, which is Kirjath-jearim, and which belonged to t.he tribe of Judah ; and from thence they conveyed the ark of God, " where his name was invocated, even the name Jehovah Zebaoth, or Lord of hosts, who sits upon the cher- ubim, that were over the ark." They had prepared a new ferriage, drawn by oxen, for the conveyance of it, which Jzzah and Ahio the sons of Abinidab drove to Abinidab's hoitse ; and then placing the ark upon it, they attended on it ; Ahio marching before the ark, and Uzzah on one side of it. When the procession began, David, with all the house 6f Israel, gave the highest demonstrations of satisfac- tion and pleasure, playing before the Lord on all manner of instruments, made of fir-wood, even on harps, and on psalteries, and on timbrels, and on cornets, and on cymbals. But the joy of David and his people on this solemn occa- sion was soon interrupted. For when the procession was advanced as far as Nachon's thrashing-floor, the oxen stumbled, and thereby shook the ark ; on which Uzzah, fearing probably it might be thrown off the carriage, very rashly laid hold of the ark of God with his hand, in order to support it ; not considering, that as he was but a Levite, he was forbidden to touch it under penalty of death, and that, as it was the dwelling of God, and immediately under his protection, he could and would have preserved it from falling, without Uzzah's officious care to prevent it. For this violation of the law, Uzzah was immediately struck by the hand of God, and fell down dead by the ark. God smote him, as the text says, for his error, or as we have it in the margin, for his rashness ; and as this is the first instance that we have of the violation of this prohibi- tion of' the Levites, from touching any thing sacred under the penalty of death, the punishment of it shows that the prohibition was really divine, and th^t as the penalty of death was incurred, it was justly inflicted, as an example to others, and to preserve a due reverence for the divine institutions. Besides, God had particularly appointed the manner in which the ark should be removed from place to place; not upon a carriage drawn by oxen, but by order- ing that the sons of Kohath should carry it on their shoul- ders, by the staves, that were put into the rings, on the vides of the ark; and their neglecting to do it on this sol- emn occasiot and consulting their ease more than their duty, by placing it -^n a carriage drawn by oxen, was an offence of no small aggravation, as it was on innovation con- trary to the express order of the law. This David himself afterward acknowledges, and assigns it as the reason of the punishment inflicted upon Uzzah, and as he himself and the whole house of Israel were present at this solem- nity, and it was impossible that the nature and cause of Uzzah's death could have been concealed. The history expressly says, that God smote him for his rashness, in lay- ing hold of what he ought not to have touched; or for his error in thinking God was not able to protect and secure it ; and David affirms, that the Lord had made a breach upon Uzzah, and in commemoration of it calk-cI the name of the place, Perez-uzzah, i. e. the breach of Uzzan ; a plain evidence, that he knew his death to be extraordinary, and inflicted by the immediate hand of God ; this is further evi- dent from the terror David was in upon account of this ex- traordinary accident, and his desisting for this reason from the resolution he had formed of introducing the ark into Jerusalem. David " was afraid of the Lord that day, and said : How shall the ark of the Lord come to me '?" I am at a loss what method to take to bring the ark, with safety to myself and people, into Jerti-salem. Every circumstance in this transaction shows that Uzzah's death was a divine punishment, and had he died by any other hand, it must have been known to many that were present, as he died in open day light, and in the view of thousands who attended in this solemn procession. Should it be said, that if the Lord would have saved the ark, because he could ; it may be also urged, that he would have brought it to any place where he intended it to be, be- cause he could have done it, and that therefore David was impertinently officious in removing it himself: the answer is; that as God had forbidden the ark to be touched, on any occasion, by the Levites, under penaky of death, it was an assurance, that in all its movements he would take it under his especial protection, and that as he was able to secure it against every hazard, without human assistance, so he certainly would do it. But God never promised to remove it himself from place to place, but expressly gave that service in charge to the Levites; and therefore it doth not follow, that because he himself could, therefore he would remove it, because he expressly ordered it to be done by others. But Uzzah's intention was certainly good, and therefore the alleged crime certainly pardonable ; the seeming exigency precluding all reflection. But this seem- ing exigency was no real one, and his acting without reflection, an aggravation of his fault; especially as he committed this offence, in consequence of a former. Uz- zah knew, or might have known, that the ark was never to be moved in any carriage, btit on the shoulders of the Levites; and had it been thus removed, the accident would not have happened to the ark, and his rashness in touching, and the punishment he suffered for it, would have been both prevented. His good intention therefore here coirid be of no avail. It was no excuse for his ignorance, if he was really ignorant, because he might, and ought to have known better ; nor for his presumption, and such it must have been, if he could not plead ignorance for his error, because this was in its nature a high aggravation of his fault. And light as l^is offence may seem, yet when it is considered in all its consequences, and what an encourage- ment it might have given for the introduction of other innovations, contrary to the institutions of the law of Moses, had this offence been passed by with impunity : it was no wonder that God should manifest his displeasure against it, by punishing with death, what he bad forbidden under the penalty of it ; thereby to prevent aLL future attempts to make anv changes in that constitution which he had established. But "supposing that the ark had been overturned for want of this careful prevention, might not Uzzah, with greater plausibility, have been smote for his omission, than he was for his commission 1" That is, might not God have more plausibly punished Uzzah for omitting what he had strictly forbidden him to do under pain of death, and what therefore it could never be his duty to do; than for committing what it was unlawful by God's own command for him to commit, and which he had made the commission of a capital crime 1 What some critics may think of this, I know not; I cannot for my life conceive, how Uzzah could have been more plausibly, or reasonably punished for omitting what it was his duty to omit, than for committing what he was obliged never to commit. The very contrary seems to me to be true, because he who doth not commit an illegal action can never deserve punishment on that account; whereas he, who actually doth such an illegal action, becomes thereby guilty, and liable to th« punishment denounced against it. Chap. 6. 2 SAMUEL. 195 During the march, David, in order to render it more solemnly religious, sacrificed, at proper intervals, oxen and fallings; and though the ark, with its proper furniture, must have been of a considerable weight, and the service of the Levites, in carrying it such a length of way on their shoulders, as from Obed-Edom's house to mount Sion, could not but be very difficult; yet the history observes, that God helped the Levites, by enabling them to bring it *o its appointed place, and preserving them from every unhappy accident, till they had safely deposited it; in grateful acknowledgment of which they presented an of- fering unto God of seven bullocks and seven rams. As the procession was accompanied with vocal as well as im- strumental music, David had prepared a proper psalm or ode (Ps. 68) to be sung by the chanters, the several parts of which M^ere suited to the several divisions of the march, and the whole of it adapted to so sacred and joyful a solemnity ; as will appear by a careful perusal and examination of it. I hope my reader will not be displeased, if I give him a short and easy paraphrase of this excellent composure. Mlien the Ark was taken up on the shoulders of the Levites. Ver. 1. Arise, O God of Israel, and in thy just displeasure execute thy vengeance upon the enemies of thy people, and let all who hate them be put to flight, and never prevail against them. 2. Drive them before thee, and scatter them, as smoke is dispersed by the violence of the wind, and let all their power and strength die away and dissolve, as wax melts away before the fire. 3. But let thy righteous people be glad, exult in the pres- ence and under the protection of thee their God, and in the triumph of their joy cry out : 4. " Sing psalms of thanksgiyings to God. Celebrate his name and glory with songs of Praise. Prepare ye his way, and let all opposition cease before him, who rode through the deserts, and guided his people with the cloud by day, and the flame of fire by night. His name is Jah, the tre- mendous being. And O exult with joy before him. 5. " He is the orphan's father, who will protect and pro- vide for him. He is the judge and avenger of the widow, will vindicate her cause, and redress her injuries, even that God, who is present with us in his holy sanctuary. G. " He it IS who increases the solitary and desolate into numerous families, and restores to liberty, and blesses with an abundance, those who are bound in chains, but makes those who are his refractory implacable enemies, dwell as in a dry and desert land, by destroying their families and fortunes, and utterly blasting their prosperity." When the Procession began. 7. How favourably didst thou appear, O God, for thy f)eople in ancient times ! How powerful was that protec- tion, which thou didst graciously afford them ! when thou didst march before them at their coming out of Egypt, and guidedst them through the wilderness ! 8. The earth shook, the very heavens dissolved at thy presence, even Sinai itself seemed to melt, the smoke of it ascending as the smoke of a furnace, when thou the God of Israel didst in thine awful majesty descend upon it, 9. Thou, O God, didst rain down, in the most liberal manner, during their passage through the desert, bread and flesh as from heaven, and didst thereby refresh, satisfy, and confirm thine inheritance, fatigued with their marches, £«nd in the utmost distress tor want of food. 10. Such was the abundance provided for them, that they dwelt in the midst of the manna and quails, in heaps sur- rounding them on everv side. Thy poor and distressed people were thus liberally supplied by thy wonderful and never-failing goodness. 11. And not only were they thus miraculously fed by thy benevolent hand, but made to triumph over all their ene- mies, who molested and opposed them. For thou gavest forth the order to attack. Thou didst assure them of success, leddest them forth against their adversaries, and their victories were celebrated by large numbers of matrons and virgins, who shouted aloud, and sang these joyful tidings : 19. " The kings of armies fled away. They fled away utterly discomfited, and they who abode with their families in their tents, received their shares in the spoils of their conquered enemies. 13. " Though when you were slaves to the Egyptians, employed in the servile drudger}-- of attending their pots ana bricks, you appeared in the most sordid and reproach- ful habits, and took up your dwellings in the most Avretched and miserable huts; yet now you are enriched with the gold and silver. of your conquered enemies, possessed of their tents, and arraved with garments shining and beauti- ful, you resemble the dove's feathers, in which the gold and silver colours mixed with each other, give a very pleasing and lovely appearance." 14. When the Lord thus scattered and overcame kings for the sake of his inheritance, how were thy people re- freshed ! How great was the joy thou gavest them in Salmon, where they obtained, beheld, and celebrated the victory ! When the Procession came in view of Mount Sion. 15. Is Bashan, that high hill Bashan, with its rough and craggy eminences, is this the hill of God, which he hath chosen for his residence, and where his sanctuary shall abide hereafter for ever 1 16. Why look ye, O ye craggy hills, with an envious impatience 1 See, there is the hill, which God hath cho- sen and desired to dwell in. Assuredly the Lord will inherit it for ever. 17. The angels and chariots of God, who attend this solemnity, and encompass the ark of his presence, are not only, as at the giving of his law, ten thousand, but twice ten thousand, and thousands of thousands. God is in the midst of them, as formerly on thee, O Sinai, and will constantly reside in his sanctuary on mount Sion, and as the guardian of it, by his almighty power continue to defend it. When the Ark ascended Sion, and was deposited in David^s Taberna,cle. 18. Thus hast thou now, O God, ascended the heights of Sion's hill, and taken possession of it, as thy future favour- ite dwelling, after having subdued our adversaries, and delivered our captive brethren from the power of their enslavers. Thou hast received gifts from men, even from our inveterate enemies, by enriching us with their spoil, subjecting them as tributaries to my crown, and enabling me by them to provide a habitation for our God, and in this joyful manner to attend thine entrance into it. 19. O blessed be Jehovah. From day to day he supports his people, and like a father bears them up, and protects them from all destructive evils. 20. He is that God to whom we owe all our past salva- tions, and from whom alone we can expect all we may hereafter need. For under his direction are all the outgo- ings of death, so that he is able to preserve his people from the approaches of it, when their inveterate enemies medi- tate and resolve their destruction. 21. But vain and impotent shall be their power and malice. God will avenge himself on their devoted heads, and their strength and craft shall not be able to protect them from his indignation, if they continue wickedly to disturb me in the possession of that kingdom, to which l;e hath advanced me. 22. 23. For this end, he raised me to the throne, and assured me that I should deliver his people from the Phi- listines, and from the hand of all their enemies. Let them therefore begin their hostilities when they please, God will appear for me, as he did in former times for our fore- fathers, and my victories over them shall be as signal anr! complete, as that over Pharaoh and his army, who were destroyed in the sea, through which he safely led his peo- ple; or as over Og the king of Bashan, the slaughter of whose army was so great, as that our victorious troops were forced to trample over their slaughtered and bloodv bodies, and even our very dogs licked up their blood, and feasted on the carnage. While tie sacrifices were offering, which concluded the whole solemnity, they closed the anthem with the following xerses. 24. Thy people have now, O God, seen thy marches, the triumphant marches of my God and king, present in his holy sanctuary, into the tabernacle prepared for it, amid the" loudest acclamations of the whole assembly. 25. The procession was led by a chosen band of singers, the players on instruments came behind them, and in the midst of them a virgin train, who accompanied their tim- brels with the harmony of their voices, and sung : 196 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 6. 26. " O celebrate the praises of God in this united con- gregation of our tribes. Celebrate the praises of Jehovah, all you who are descended from Israel, your great and fruitful progenitor." 27. Even Benjamin himself was present, who, though the smallest of our tribes, had so far tne pre-eminence over the rest, as to give the first king and ruler to the people ; even he was present, and rejoiced to see the honour done to Jerusalem, and the crown established on my head. Here the princes of Judah attended, with the supreme council of that powerful tribe ; with the princes of Zebu- Ion, and those of Naphtali; who from their distant borders joined the procession; all unanimously consenting that Jerusalem should become the seat of worship, and capital of my Icingdom. 28. It is thy God, O Israel, who hath thus advanced thee, as a nation, to thy present state of dignity and power. Strengthen, O God, the foundation of our happiness, and by thy favour render it perpetual. 29. As the ark of thy presence is now fixed in Jerusalem, protect it by thy power, and let the kings of the earth bring their gifts, present their offerings, and pay their adoration at thy altar. 30. O rebuke and break the power of the Egyptian croc- odile, his princes and nobles, who pay homage to their bulls, and all his people, who stupidly worship their calves, and dance in honour of them to the tinkling sounds of instruments and bells. Trample under foot their silver- plated idols, and utterly disperse the people who delight in war, 31. Let the princes of Egypt come and worship at thy sanctuary, and the far-distant Ethiopia accustom herself to lift up her hands in adoration of thy majesty. 32. O may all the kingdoms of the earth celebrate, in sacred songs, the majesty of our God. Let all sing the praises of our Jehovah. 33. He is the omnipresent God, the proprietor and Lord of the heaven of heavens, which he spread ottt of old. He makes the clouds his chariot when he rides through the heavens, and storms and tempests, thunders and lightnings, the instruments of his vengeance against his enemies. When he sends forth his voice in the mighty thunder, how awful and astonishing that voice ! 34. Ascribe to him that almighty strength which belongs to him. Though his empire is universal, his kingdom is peculiarly exaked over Israel, by whom alone he is ac- knowledged as the true God, and who manifests the great- ness of his power in the clouds of heaven, 35. O God, the God of Israel, how terrible is thy majesty, when thou comest forth from thy heavenly and earthly sanctuaries, for the destruction of thine enemies, and the defence of thy people. It is he who inspires them with strength and courage, and renders them a mighty and powerful nation. Eternal blessing and praise be ascribed unto our God, I think the division I have made of this psalm, into its several parts, is natural and easy, which the subject mat- ter of it points out, and which renders the whole of it a regular, well-connected, and elegant composure. With- out this, or some such method, it appears to me broken, and its parts independent on each other ; the expressions will be many of them unintelligible, and the occasion and propriety of them scarcely discernible. The very learned Michaelis acknowledges the difficulties attending this psalm, and I suspect my own strength, when I attempt to do what lie thought above his much greater abilities, I have how- ever done my best, and submit the whole to the candour of niy readers. I shall now conclude by making a few observations on the whole anthem. And I would first lake notice of the great and glorious subject of this hymn. It is the God of the Hebrews, and designed to celebrate his praises, on ac- count of the perfections of his nature, and the operations of his providence. And with what dignity is he described! How high and worthy the character given him, in every respect suitable to his infinite majesty, and the moral rectitude and purity of his nature ! How grand are the descriptions of him as the omnipresent God, inhabiting his smictuariesbolh in heaven and earth ! as the orisrinal self-ex- isting being, which his name Jehovah signifies; the tre- jwendous being, worthy of all adoration and reverence, in- •isded in the name of Jah! as the almighty God, encom- passed with thousands and ten thousands of angels, and innumerable chariots, that stand ready prepared in the armory of heaven ! that rides through the heavens in his majesty, whose voice is in the thunder, Avho makes the clouds and vapours of heaven subservient to his pleasure, and at whose presence the earth, the heavens dissolve, and the highest hills seem to melt away like wax ! Descriptions the most sublime in their nature, and that tend to strike the mind with a holy reverence and awe. And as to his moral character, and providential government of the world, he is represented as the righteous God, the hater and punish- er of incorrigible wickedness, the father of the fatherless, the judge of the widow, that blesses men with numerous families, that breaks the prisoner's chains, and restores him to his liberty; the God and guardian of his people, the great disposer of victory, and giver of national prosperity ; the supreme author of every kind of salvation, and ay having death under his absolute command, and directing the outgoings of it by his sovereign will. This was the God of the ancient Hebrews. This is the God whom Da- vid worshipped, and whom all wise and good men must acknowledge and adore. Nor is there one circumstance or expression in this noble composure, derogatory to the majesty and honour of the supreme being, or that can con- vey a single sentiment to lessen our esteem and venera- tion for him. Let any one compare, with this psalm of Da- vid, the ancient hymns of the most celebrated poets on their deities, how infinitely short will they fall of the grandeur and sublimity which appear in every part of it. Strip the hymn of Callimachus on Jove of the poetry and language, and the sentiments of it will appear generally puerile and absurd, and it could not be read without the utmost con- tempt. Jove with him, that aicv ava^, asi ueyni, (^iraffrroAoj ovpaviSrjai, that perpetual king, ever great, and lawgiver to the celestial deities, as he calls him, was born, he can't tell where, whether in Mount Ida, or Arcadia, washed on his birth in a river of water, to cleanse him from the de- filements he brought into the world with him, had his navel string fall from him, sucked the dugs of a goaf, and ate sweet honey, and so at last he grew up to be the supreme God. No despicable ballad can contain more execrable stuff than this, and some other like circumstarces that he relates of him ; circumstances that render utterly incredible what he says of him, as never dying, giving laws to the gods, obtaining heaven by his power and strength, gov- erning kings and princes, and the inspector of their actions, the giver of riches and prosperity, wisdom and virtue, strength and power. That a mortal-born baby should grow up to become the one supreme and immortal God, or an infant nursed in Crete should rise to be the king of heaven, or one who gloried in his adulteries, should be constituted lawgiver to the celestial deities, oi he whose character was stained with the vilest impurities, should be the giver of virtue; are absurdities, that one would think it was impossible for any one to digest. How free are the hymns of David from all such absurd, dishon- ourable, and impious descriptions of God ! Every senti- ment he conveys of him is excellent and grand, worthy s being of infinite perfection, and the supreme Lord anc governor of the universe. It would be easy to enlarge or this subject. We may further take notice of the propriet) of these historical incidents, that the Psalmist takes notice of in this sacred composure, and how the whole of it ij calculated to promote the true spirit of piety and rationa devotion. The ark, that was now translating to its fixec seat in Jerusalem, was the same ark that accompanied th( Hebrews in the wilderness, where God was in a peculiai manner present, where Moses consulted God, where h*; received answers from him, and whence he received hi. directions; and who gave him manifest tokens of his spe- cial protection and favour, in the miraculous works he performed for them. Hence David puts them in mind oi God's going before them in the wilderness, of the terroi of his majesty on monnt Sinai, of the manna and quail? he rained down on them as from heaven, of the viciorief he gave them over their enemies, and his enriching them with the spoils of their conquered forces and countries ; tc excite in them a relierious hope and trust, that God would protect Jerusalem, which was to be the future residence oj the ark of his presence, and bless the whole nation with prosperity, if they continued firm in their allegiance to and worship "of him. On this account the hymn is calculated Chap. 6. 2 SAMUEL. 197 to celebrate his praises for these ancient wonders of his power and goodness wrought in their favour, as well as for that present state of national grandeur and prosperity to which he had advanced them under David's government; and, on the other hand, to excite their fear of his dis- pleasure, if they went on in their trespasses, and proved a corrupt and wicked people. Well might this grand assem- bly be glad and rejoice before their God, sing praises to his name, ascribe all power and dominion to him, whose excel- lency, whose majesty and government, were peculiarly over Israel on earth, and who rules in heaven, and manifests his power in the clouds thereof. I would just add, that the several ascriptions of glory to God, and the frequent ex- hortations to bless him, with which the psalm abounds, give an agreeable relief to the mind, are added with great propriety, and render the whole composure more pleasing and solemn. It was customary, as has been observed, among the gentiles, to celebrate the supposed advent of their gods, at particular times, and to particular places, •with the greatest demonstrations of joy ; but David had much nobler reasons for introducing the' ark into the tab- ernacle he had prepared for it at Jerusalem, with all the pomp and splendour, and public festivity and joy, that could possibly be shown on the occasion. The whole procession was in'honour of, and a national instance of homage paid to the true God. By the ark's being fixed at Jerusalem, that God, who honoured the ark with the tokens of his pres- ence, made Jerusalem his perpetual habitation, became the immediate guardian and protector of the new-built city, and thereby peculiarly concerned for its prosperity and peace. This is represented as the language of God himself " The Lord hath chosen Sion. He hath desired it for his habitation. This is my rest for ever. Here will I dwell, for I have desired it. I will abundantly bless her provis- ions. Her saints shall shout aloud for joy." — Chandler. Ver. 3. And they set the ark of God upon a new cart, and brought it out of the house of Abina- dab that was in Gibeah : and Uzzah and Ahio, the sons of Abinadab, drave the new cart. ! The history of conveyance by means of vehicles, carried or drawn, is a subject too extensive to be treated of fully here. There can be no doubt, that after man had accus- tomed cattle to submit to the control of a rider, and to sup- port the incumbent weight of a person, or persons, whether the animal were ox, camel, or horse, that the next step was to load such a creature, properly trained, with a litter, or portable conveyance ; balanced, perhaps, on each side. This might be long before the mechanism of the wheel was employed, as it is still practised among pastoral people. Nevertheless, we find that wheel-carriages are of great an- tiquity ; for we read of wagons so early as Gen. xlv. 19, . and military carriages, perhaps, for chiefs and officers, first of all, in Exodus xiv. 25: " The Lord took off" the chariot wheels of the Egyptians :" and as these were the fighting strength of Egypt, this agrees with those ancient writers, who report that Egypt was not, in its early state, intersect- ed by canals, as in later ages; after the formation of which, wheel-carriages were laid aside, and little used, if at all. The first mention of chariots, we believe, occurs Genesis xli. 43 : " Pharaoh caused Joseph to ride {recab) in the second chariot {marecabetK) that belonged to him." This, most likely, was a chariot of state, not an ordinary or travelling, but a handsome equipage, iDecoming the rep- resentative of the monarch's person and power. We find, as already hinted. Gen. xlv. 19, that Egypt had another kind of wheel-carriage, better adapted to the conveyance of burdens ; " Take out of the land of Egypt (ni^jp ogeluth) wagons, wheel-carriages, for conveyance of your little ones and your women :" these were family vehicles, for the use of ihe feeble; including, if need be, Jacob himself : accord- ingly, we read (verse 27) of the wagons which Joseph had : sent to carr , him, (Jacob,) and which perhaps the aged pa- triarch knew by their construction to be Egypt-built; for, so soon as he sees them, he believes the reports from that country, though he had doubted of them before when de- ' livered to him by his sons. This kind of chariot deserves attention, as we find it afterward employed on various oc- casions in scripture, among which are the following: first, it was intended by the princes of Israel for carrying parts of the sacred utensils; Numb. vii. 3: " They brought their offering — six covered wagons {ogeluth) and twelve oxen ;" — (two oxen to each wagon.) Here these wagons are ex- pressly said to be covered ; and it should appear that they were so generally; beyond question those sent by Joseph for the women of Jacob's family were so ; among other pur- poses, for that of seclusion. Perhaps this is a radical idea in their name; as gal signifies circle^ these wagons might be covered by circular headings, spread on hoops, like those of our own wagons ; what we call a tilt. Consider- able importance attaches to this heading, or tilt, in the his- tory of the curiosity of the men of Belhshemesh, 1 Sam. vi. 7, where we read that the Philistines advised to make a new covered wagon, or cart (ogeleh;) — and the ark of the Lord was put into it — and, no doubt, was carefully cover- ed over — concealed — secluded by those who sent it; — it came to Bethshemesh ; and the men of that town who were reaping in the fields, perceiving the cart coming, went and examined what it contained : " and they saw the very (hn) ark, and were joyful in seeing it." Those who first exam- ined it, instead of carefully covering it up again, as a sa- cred utensil, suffered it to lie open to common inspection, which they encouraged, in order to triumph in the votive offerings ft had acquired, and to gratify profane curiosity; the Lord, therefore, punished the people, (verse 19,) "be- cause they had inspected— ;/ne^Z iido (2) the ark." This affords a clear view of the transgression of these Israelites, who had treated the ark with less reverence than the Phi- listines themselves ; for those heathen conquerors had at least behaved to Jehovah with no less respect than they did to their own deities; and being accustomed to carry them in covered wagons, for privacy, they maintained the same privacy as a mark of honour to the Gfod of Israel. The Le- vites seemed to have been equally culpable with the com- mon people ; they ought to have conformed to the law, and not to have suffered their triumph on this victorious occasion to beguile them into a transgression so contrary to the very first principles of the theocracy. That this word ogcleh describes a covered wagon, we learn from a third instance, that of Uzzah, 2 Sam. vi. 3, for we can- not suppose, that David could so far forget the dignity of the ark of the covenant, as to suffer it to be exposed, in a public procession, to the eyes of all Israel; especially after the punishment of the people of Belhshemesh. " They carried the ark of God, on a new ogelch — covered cart" — and Uzzah put forth [his hand, or some catching in- strument] to the ark of God, and laid hold of it, to stop its advancing any farther, but the oxen harnessed to the car*, going on, they drcAV the cart away from the ark, and the whole weight of the ark falling out of the cart unex- pectedly, on Uzzah, crushed him to death — "and he died on the spot, with the ark of God" upon him. And David called the place "the breach of Uzzah" — that is, where Uzzah was broken — crushed to death. See now the pro- portionate severity of the punishments attending profs- nation of the ark. 1. The Philistines suffered by diseases, from which they were relieved after their oblations. 2. The Bethshemites also sufl^ered, but not fatally, by dis- eases of a different nature, which, after a time, passed off. These were inadvertences. But, 3. Uzzah, who ought to have been fully instructed and correctly obedient, who con- ducted the procession, who was himself a Levite — this man was punished fatally for his remissness — his inattention lo the law; which expressly directed that the ark should be carried on the shoulders of the priests, the Kohathites, Numb. iv. 4, 19,20, distinct from those things carried in ogeluth — covered wagons, chap. vii. 9. That this kind of wagon was used for carrving considerable weights and even cumbersome goods, (and therefore was fairly analo- gous to our Own wagons — tilted wagons,) we gather from the expression of the Psalmist, xlvi. 9 : — He maketh wars to cease to the end of the earth , The bow he breaketh ; and cutteth asunder the spear ; The chariots (ogeluth) he burneth in the fire. The writer is mentioning the instruments of war — the bow — the spear; then, he says, the wagons (plural) which used to return home loaded with plunder, these share the fate of th"ir companions, the bow and the spear; and are burned h- .he fire, the very idea of the classical allegory, peace burning the implements of war, introduced here with the happiest effect: not the general's marecabelh ; but the plundering wagons. This is still more expressive, if these wagons carried captives ; which we know they did in other 198 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 6. tastances, women and children. "The captive-carrying wagon is burnt." There can be no stronger description of the effect of peace ; and it closes the period with peculiar emphasis. — Taylor in Calmet. Ver. 6. And when they came to Nachon's thrash- ing-floor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it ; for the oxen shook it. 7. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah, and God smote him there for his error ; and there he died by the ark of God. Happy were it for us, if we could account for the opera- tions of God, with the same facility that we can for the aciions of his saints ; but his counsels are a great deep, and hi.- judgments (just though they be) are sometimes obscure, and past finding out. For what shall we say to the fate of Uzzah 1 or what tolerable cause can we assign for his sud- den and untimely end'? It was now near seventy years since „.i . Israelites had carried the ark from place toplace, and i>^ long a disuse had made them forget the manner of doing ir. In conformity to what they had heard of the Philis- tines, they put it into a new cart, or wagon, but this was against the express direction of the law, which ordered it to be borne upon men's shoulders. It is commonly sup- posed that Uzzah was a Levite, though there is no proof of It from scripture ; but supposing he was, he had no right to attend upon the ark ; that province, by the same law, was restramed to those Levites only who were of the house of Kohath : nay, put the case he had been a Kohathite by birth, yet he had violated another command, which prohib- ited even these Levites, (though they carried it by staves upon their shoulders,) upon pain of death, to touch it with .heir hands : so that here was a threefold transgression .of the divine will in this method of proceeding. The ark, fas some say,) by Uzzah's direction, was placed in a cart ; Uzzah, without any proper designation, adventures to at- tend it ; when he thought it in danger of falling, offi- ciously he put forth his hand, and laid hold on it, (all vio- lating of th ' divine commands !) and this (as is supposed) not so much oui of reverence to the sacred symbol of God's presence, as out of diffidence of his providence, as unable to preserve it from overturning. The truth is, this ark had so long continued in obscurity, that the people, in a manner, had almost lost all sense of a divine power residing m it, and therefore approached it with irreverence. This is implied in David's exhortation to Zadock and Abiathar, after this misfortune upon Uzzah. " Ye are the chief of tlie fathers of the Levites, sanctify yourselves therefore, both ye and your brethren, that you may bring up the ark of the Lord God of Israel, unto the place that I have pre- ] "ed for it ; for, because ye did it not at the firsts the Lord our God made a breach upon us, for that we sought him not after the due order." What wonder then, if God, being minded to testify his immediate presence with the ark, to retrieve the ancient honour of that sacred vessel, and to curb all licentious profanations of it for the future, should single out one that was the most culpable of many, one who, in three instances, was then violating his commands, to be a monument of his displeasure against either a wilful ignorance or a rude contempt of his precepts, be they ever so seemingly small ; that by such an example of terr' ^ he might inspire both priests and people with a sacred dread of his majesty, and a profound veneration for his mysteries. — Stackhouse. Ver. 13. And it was so, that when they that bare the ark of the Lord had gone six paces, he sacrificed oxen and fatlings. From these words, some would infer, that David, having measured the ground between Obed-edom's house, and the place he had built for the reception of the ark, had altars raised, at the distance of every six paces, whereon he caused sacriQces to be offered as the ark passed by. But it is easy to imagine what a world of confusion this would create in the procession, and therefore the more rational construction i<, that after those who carried the ark had advanced six paces, without any such token of divine wrath as Uzzah had undergone, then did they offer a sacrifice to God, which might consist of several living creatures, all sacrificed and offered up at once. But even supposing that, at set distan- ces, there were sacrifices all along the way that they went ; yet we are to know that it was no unusual thing for hea- thens to confer on their gods, nay, even upon their empe- rors, the same honours that we find David here bestowing upon the ark of the God of Israel. For in this manner (as Suetonius tells us) was Otho received— Cum per omne iter, dextra finistraque, oppidatim victimse csderentur : and the like he relates of Caligula — Ut a miseno movit, inter altaria, et victimas, ardentesque ta^das, dencissimo ac laetissimo obviorum agmine incessit.-^STACKHousE. Ver. 14. And David danced before the Lord with all his might ; and David ivas girded with a linen ephod. In the oriental dances, in which the women engage by themselves, the lady of highest rank in the company takes the lead; and is followed by her companions, who imitate her steps, and if she sings, make up the chorus. The tunes are extremely gay and lively, yet with something in them wonderfully soft. The steps are varied according to the pleasure of her who leads the dance, but always in exact time. This statement may enable us to form a correct idea of the dance, which the women of Israel performed under the direction of Miriam, on the banks of the Red Sea. The prophetess, we are told, " took a timbrel in her hand, and all the women went out after her, with timbrels and dan- ces." She led the dance, while they imitated her steps, which were not conducted according to a set, well-known form, as in this country, but extemporaneous. The conjec- ture of Mr. Harmer is extremely probable, that David did not dance alone before the Lord, when he brought up the ark, but as being the highest in rank, and more skilful than any of the people, he led the religious dance of the males. — JPaxton. Ver. 16. And as the ark of the Lord came into the city of David, Michal, Saul's daughter, look- ed through a window, and saw King David leaping and dancing before the Lord ; and she despised him in her heart. 17. And they brought in the ark of the Lord, and set it in his place, in the midst of the tabernacle that David had pitched for it : and David offered burnt-offerings and peace-offerings before the Lord. 18. And as soon as David had made an end of offering burnt-offerings and peace- offerings, he blessed the people in the name of the Lord of hosts. 19. And he dealt among all the people, eve7i among the whole multitude* of Israel, as well to the women as men, to every one a cake of bread, and a good piece of flesh, and a flagon of wine. So all the people de- parted every one to his house. 20. Then Da- vid returned to bless his household. And Mi- chal, the daughter of Saul, came out to meet David, and said, How glorious was the king of Israel to-day, who uncovered himself to-day in the eyes of the handmaids of his servants, as one of the vain fellows shamelessly uncovereth himself! When this public transaction of removing the ark was happily concluded, the pious prince retired to his palace, to bless his own family and household, and share with them the public joy. But an unexpected accident interrupted the plea.sure he promised himself, and could not but greatly affect him, as it arose from one, from whom he had no reason to expect the contemptuous treatment that she gave him. As the ark of the Lord was just entered into the city of David, or mount Sion, Michal, Saul's daughter, looked through a window of the palace to behold the procession, saw David dancing with great spirit and earnestness, and viewed him with contempt; or, as the text says, she de- spised him in her heart ; and when, after the solemnity. Chap. 6. 2 SAMUEL. 199 David was returned to his habitation, she came out to meet him, and, with indignation and a sneer, said to him, " How glorious was the king of Israel to-day, who openly showed himself to-day to the eyes of the handmaids of his servants, as one of the vain persons openly shows himself I" David's answer to her was severe, but just. " Have I descended be- neath the dignity of my character, as king of Israel, by diviesting myself of my royal robes, appearing publicly among my people, and, like them, dancing and playing be- fore the ark 1 It was before the Lord, who chose me be- lore thy father, and before all his house, to appoint me ruler over the people of the Lord. Therefore will I play on my iiarp before the Lord; and if this be to make myself cheap and contemptible, I will be more so than this ; and how high soever be my condition as king, 1 will always be humble in the judgment I form of myself; and as for those maid-servants of whom thou speakest, I shall be honoured among them ; the very meanest of the people wiil respect me the more for my popularity, when they see me condescend to share in their sacred mirth, and express it in the same manner, by which they testify their own joy in the public solemnities." In this he acted as a wise and politic, as well as a religious prince; for in ancient times dancing itself was in use, as a religious ceremony, and in testimony of gratitude and joy, in public solemnities. Thus Miriam, the prophetess, took a timbrel in her hand, and all the womf-n vi^ent out after her with timbrels and with dances, to celebrate their deliverance from Pharaoh, his de- struction in the Red Sea, and their own safe passage through the waters of it. So also Jephthah's daughter met her father with timbrels and dances, to congratulate his victory over the Ammonites, and God's having taken vengeance for him of those enemies. Thus at the yearly feast of the Lord at Shiloh, the virgins of the place came out to dance in dances. It was used also frequently among the gentiles, by the greatest personages in honour of the gods, and re- commended by the greatest philosophers, as a thing highly decent and becoming in itself. But though David acted from a truly religious zeal, yet De had been very severely censured for his habit and be- haviour on this occasion ; being dressed, as it hath been represented, in a linen ephod, and " dancing before the Lord, in such a frantic indecent manner, that he exposed his nakedness to the bystanders." Mr. Bayle in the first part of his remarks, expresses himself in a more cautious and temperate manner, and (|pth not pass his judgment, whether David discovered his nakedness or not ; but says, that "if he did discover it, his action might.be deemed ill, morally speaking ; but if he did no more than make himself contemptible by his postures, and by not keeping up the majesty of his character, it was but ari imprudence at most, and not a crime." He adds, that " it ought to be considered, on what occasion it was that he danced. It was when the ark was carried to Jerusalem, and conse- quently the excess of his joy and of his leaping, testified his attachment and sensibility for sacred things." I shall just remark here, that if David did really discover his naked- ness on this occasion, yet if it was merely accidental, and without any design, it could not be deemed ill, morally speaking, by any good judge of morality. I apprehend also that Mr. Bayle doth not know enough of David's man- ner of dancing, and the postures he made use of, to be sure that he rendered himself deservedly ridiculous by the use of them ; because persons may dance in a very brisk and lively manner, without any postures that shall deserve contempt, and because there is no word in the original, that is made use of to express David's behaviour in this pro- cession, that either implies, or will justify such a supposi- tion. The case which Mr. Bayle mentions from Ferrand of St. Francis of Assisi, is so perfectly different from that of David, as that it should not have been related by him in the article of David, at least without some mark of disap- probation. St. Francis voluntarily stripped himself stark naked, in the presence of many persons, met together to be witness to his absolute renunciation of his paternal inher- i'ance. This was the downright madness of enthusiasm. David, on the contrary, divested himself only of his royal dress, and put on such a habit, as effectually preserved him from everv thing of indecency and absurdity in his appearance. For he was clothed in a double garment; a lobe of fine linen, with a linen ephod. These two gar- ments are expressly distinguished in the account of the vest- ments tf the high-priesis : "Thou shaU take garments and put upon Aaron, (and as we well render it,) ihe ephod, and the robe of the ephod." And again : " Thet-e are the gar- ments, which they shall make, the breastplate, and the ephod, and the robe." The fabric of them was different ; the ephod being made of gold, blue, purpk, and scarlet; but the robe formed all of blue. The shape of them was also different ; the ephod teaching only to the knees, but the robe flowing down so as to cover the feet; called there- fore by the LXX. vo^r)(m^ and the Vulgate version, stola. The robe also had no division in it throughout, but was made whole and round, with an opening in the middle of it, on the top, so that it was impossible that any part of the body could be seen through it ; or that David, in dancing, could expose to view, what decency required him to con- ceal ; especially as the ephod was, on this occasion, thrown over it, and certainly tied with a girdle, as the priest's ephod always was. With these linen garments David clothed himself on this solemnity, both out of reverence for God, and for conveniency ; because they were cooler, and less cumbersome than his royal habit, and would not occasion that large perspiration, which the exercise of dancing would otherwise have produced. And however improper such a long flowing robe, girt round with a girdle, may be thought for a man dancing with all his might, yet it is certain that David did dance in such a one, and there is no reason to think it could be anywise inconvenient to him. For, though the robe was close, i. e. had no opening from the breast to the feet, and was girt round with the ephod, yet it was large and wide, and flowing at the lower end ; and hanging down in various folds, gave room suffi- cient for the full exercise of the feet in dancing. And of this every one will have full conviction, who frequents any of our polite assemblies, in which he will see many fair ones dance, like the king of Israel, with all their might, without any great inconvenience from the flowing habits, which so greatly adorn them. It may be further observed, that this robe was worn by kings, their children, priests, Levites, and prophets, when they appeared on very solemn occasions, which also cov- ered over their other garments. Thus Samuel is repre- sented as covered with a robe or mantle, as we render it. All the Leviies, that bare the ark, and the singers, aid Chenaniah, the master of the carriage, or of those wno carried the ark, appeared in it on this very occasion. Kings' daughters were clothed in the same habit. The princes of the sea wore them. And even God himself is repre- sented, clad with zeal, as with a robe. As David therefore dressed himself on this occasion, with a long flowing linen robe, instead of the robe of stale, proper to him as king of Israel, which was made of different, and much richer ma- terials ; he was scornfully insulted by Saul's daughter, not for exposing his nakedness to the spectators, which he no more did, nor could do, than all the rest of the attendants, who wore the same habit, but for uncovering himself in the eyes of the handmaids of his servants, i. e. appearing openly before the meanest of the people, in a dress, wholly unworthy, as she thought, the character and majesty of the king of Israel. Nor was this all ; for it appears, by part of David's answer to Michal, that she was particularly offend- ed with his playing publicly on the harp; and, probably, she mimicked and ridiculed him, by the attitude in v/hich she put herself on this occasion. For, in answer to her reproach, David says to her, " It was before the. Lord that I uncovered myself .... therefore I will play before the Lord," i. e. look on it with what contempt you please, yet as I openly played on my harp in the presence, and in honour of God, I glory in it, and will continue to do it, when any fair opportunity presents itself. His particularly mention- ing joto?/mif 6e/(9r^ the Lord, plainly shows, that there was somewhat, in the nature and "manner of her reproach, that gave occasion to it. Besides, it should be remarked, that the eastern princes, out of affectation, and to strike the people with greater rev- erence, seldom appeared in public, and whenever they did, not without great pomp and solemnity ; as is the cus- tom among them to this day. Michal therefore unquestion- ably thought, that David made himself too cheap, by thus discovering himself to public view, without anv royal pomp, or marks of distinction, and familiarly mixing himself with the attendants on this solemnity, as though he had 200 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 7. been one of them, and not the king of Israel. And the meaning of Michal's words in this view will be : JJow glo- rious was the king of Israel to-day, who uncovered, i. e. stripped himself of his majesty, and all the ensigns of his royal dignity, and openly exposed himself to the most public view of the meanest of the people, as a vain thoughtless person, who, without a proper habit, or regard to character, expo- ses himself to public ridicule and scorn ! Mr. Bayle seems to be pretty much of Michal's opinion, when he says, " It would be thought very strange, in any part of Europe, if, on a day of procession of the holy sac- rament, the kings should dance in the streets with nothing but a small girdle on their bodies." It may be so, but the observation is nothing to the purpose, because David did not dance in the streets in this manner, as he insinuates. Besides, Mr. Bayle could not but know, that customs vary, and that the same customs may be thought very venerable and ridiculous, in different nations, and at different times. However solemn and sacred the procession of the sacra- ment might have seemed here, two or three centuries ago, and may at this day appear in popish countries, it would now seem a most contemptible and absurd farce in this na- tion. We should look with indignation and scorn, to see a crowned head holding the stirrup or bridle of a triple- mitred monk's horse, or humbly bending to kiss his toe ; or emperors and princes carrying wax candles in their hands, in company of a set of shorn baldpated priests, or devoutly praying befoi;e a dead log of wood, or going in pilgrimage to consecrated statues, and kiss thresholds, and venerate the relics of dead bodies; and yet, despicable as these practices are in themselves, they have been used, and some of them continue in other nations to be used to this day ; and have been, and are now, so far from being thought strange or ridiculous, as that they were, and are still es- teemed very high and laudable instances of piety and de- votion. If we examine the words themselves, by which Michal reproached David, they can never be fairly so interpreted, as to mean that indecency, which some writers would be glad to find in them ; and as to David's answer, it is utterly inconsistent with such a meaning. David said to Michal, " It was before the Lord." What was before the Lord 1 What, his discovering his nakedness 1 The very consid- eration of his being before the Lord would have prevented it, as he knew that such an indecency, in the solemnities of divine worship, was highly offensive to God, and prohibit- ed under penalty of death. Again he says, " Therefore will I play before the Lord," i. e. play upon my harp; which must refer to her reproaching him, as appearing like a common harper ; for it would be no answer to her, had she reproached him for that scandalous appearance, which some would make him guilty of. Further he adds : "And I will be more vile than this, and will be base in my own sight." I will not scruple to submit to lower services than this, in honour of God ; and notwithstanding my regal dig- nity, will not think myself above any humiliations, how great soever they may be, that may testify my gratitude and submission to him ; — expressions these which evidently show, that what she called David's uncovering himself, was what he had designedly done, and not an accidental involuntary thing, without design, and contrary to his in- tention. And had he designedly exposed his nakedness, or even without design, how could he have made himself more vile, or rendered himself more worthy of censure and reproach 1 Upon the whole, that David danced so, as to discover What he ought to have concealed, is an invidious surmise, that no man of learning or candour will affirm, and which has nothing in the grammatical sense of the ex- pressions made use of to support it, and is in its nature im- possible, from the make and form of the garments he was clothed with, I shall only add, that when the scripture says, " There- fore INIichal, Saul's daughter, had no child to the day of her death," it doth not seem to be remarked, as though it was a punishment on her for this contempt of David, unless he voluntarily lefc her bed, for so heinous and undeserved an insult; but as a reproach on herself for her barrenness, she having never had any children by David ; barrenness being accounted as reproachful and dishonourable a circum- stance, as could befall a married woman. So that she had little reason to reproach her husband, when she was liable lo a much greater reproach herself.— Chandler. Ver. 19. And he dealt among all the people, even among the whole multitude of Israel, as well to the women as men, to every one a cake of bread, and a good piece of flesh, and a flagon of wine. So all the people departed every one to his house. The entertainer at a feast, occasionally dismissed his guests with costly presents. Lysimachus of Babylon hav- ing entertained Hemerus the tyrant of the Babylonians and Seleucians, with three hundred other guests, gave every man a silver cup, of four pounds weight. When Alexander made his marriage feast at Susa in Persia, he paid the debts of all his soldiers out of his own exchequer, and pre- - sented every one of his guests, who were not fewer than nine thousand, with golden cups. The master of the house among the Romans, used also to give the guests certain presents at their departure, or to send them after they were gone, to their respective habitations. It is probable that this custom, like many others which prevailed in Greece and Rome, was derived from the nations of Asia ; for the sacred writers allide repeatedly to a similar custom, which closed the religious festivals or public entertainments among the chosen people of God, When David brought up the ark from the house of Obed-edom, into the place which he had prepared for it, he offered burnt-offerings and peace-offerings before the Lord. And as soon as the solemnity was finished, " he dealt among all the people, even among the whole multitude of Israel, as well to the women as men, to every one a cake of bread, and a flag- on of wine." — Paxton. Dr. Chandler and his associates, received presents from the Greeks of Athens, consisting of perfumed flowers, pomegranates, oranges, and lemons, pastry, and other arti- cles. The presents made by David were no doubt very different. Leavened and unleavened bread, the flesh whicifi remained from the peace-offerings, and some of the wine then presented. (Josephus.) The rabbins suppose that the word we translate, a good piece of flesh, signifies th-j sixth part of an animal. Without, hoM'ever, admitting the propriety of this assertion, it may lead to the true explana- tion of 'the word. Maillet affirms, that a sheep, with a proper quantity of rice, which answers the purpose of bread very frequently in the East, will furnish a good repast for sixty people. If now the ^leople of the JeAvish army were divided into tens, as it seems they were, who might mess together, and lodge under one and the same teni, as it is highly probable, from every tenth man's being appointed to fetch or prepare provision for their fellow-soldiers, accord- ing to what we read, Judges xx. 10, then the sixth part of a sheep would be sufficient for the men at one repast, and be sufficient for one mess or tent of soldiers ; and from this particular case it may come to signify, in general, a suffi- cient portion for each person, which, indeed, seems to be the meaning of our translators, when they render the word a good piece of flesh — enough for an ample repast. The other part of this royal and sacred donation was a flagon of wine, perhaps a gourd full of wine is meant. The shells of gourds are used to this day in the eastern parts of the world for holding quantities of wine for present spending, and particularly in sacred festivals. So when Dr. Richard Chandler was about leaving Athens, he tells us, he supped at the customhouse, where "the archon provided a gourd of choice wine, and one of the crew excelled en the lyre." And describing a panegyris, or general sacred assembly of the Greeks in the Lesser Asia, he informs us, " that the church was only stones piled up for walls, without a roo'", and stuck on this solemnity with wax-candles lighted, acil small tapers, and that after fulfilling their religious duties, it is the custom of the Greeks lo indulge in festivity; at which time he found the multitude sitting under half-tents, with a store of melons and grapes, besides lambs and sheep to be killed, wine in gourds and skins, and other necessary provision." What the size of the gourds that ancientl> grew in that country was, or what that of those that are now found there, may not be quite certain. But a gourd full of wine, for each person, was abundantly sufficient for a joy that required attention to temperance.-^HAHMER. CHAPTER VII. Ver. 18. Then went King David in, and sat bo- Chap. 8. 2 SAMUEL. 201 fore the Lord, and he said, Who am I, O Lord God 1 and what is my house, that thou hast brought me hitherto? Pococke has given the figure of a person half sitting and half kneeling, that is, kneeling so as to rest the most mus- cular part of his body on his heels. This, he observes, is the manner in which inferior persons sit at this day before great men, and is considered as a very humble posture. In this manner, probably, David sat before the Lord, when he went into the sanctuary, to bless him lor his promise respecting his family. — Harmer. CHAPTER VIII. Ver. 2 And he smote Moab, and measured them with a line, casting them down to the ground ; even with two lines measured he to put to death, and Avith one full line to keep alive: and so the Moabites became David's servants, and brought gifts. See on 2 Sam. 12.31. David had scarce ended his wars with the Philistines, but he was engaged in another with the Moabites, of which the scripture history gives, as I understand it, the following account. " He also smote Moab, and he measured them by a line," i. e. in one tract of the coiintry,to throw them down level with the ground. Then he measured out two tracts, one to put to death, and one full tract to preserve alive; and Moab became David's servants, bringing him gifts. When he had beat the Moabites, he ordered a general survey to be made of the whole country ; in one part or tract of which he levelled Moab with the ground, i. e. razed so many of their towns and fortresses, as he thought neces- sary to secure his conquest. He then proceeded to ani- madvert on the inhabitants, measuring out two tracts, or parts of the country, one line or tract for death, and the lUiness 01 a ane, a very large tract of the courtry, to keep alive, i. e. to cut off the inhabitants of the one, those who had been most active in the war against him, and to pre- serve the far larger part of them alive ; and thus made the whole nation tributary to his crown. Who was the ag- gressor in these two last actions, the scripture history doth not determine. Some authors s^em inclined to give David the credit of it, though without any shadow of proof I apprehend the contrary may be collected from what the Psalmist says: "That Edom, Moab, Ammon, Amalek, the Syrians under Hadadezer, and other nations, had consult- ed together with one consent to cut off Israel from being a nation; and that the name of Israel might be no more in remembrance. This seems plainly to refer to the history of the wars with these very nations, related in Samuel. Against such a cruel confederac/ as this, David had a right to defend himself, and to take such a vengeance on his enemies, as was necessary to his own and his people's fu- ture safety. If this powerful league, to extirpate the Is- raelites, was a justifiable compact, because Israel was a common enemy, who ravaged ad libitum, not from the common misunderstanding of states, but from an insatiable appetite for blood and murder, as some writers choose to represent them ; it will certainly follow, that there may be occasions that will justify this severe execution, in the utter excision of nations ; and that if the Moabites, Amal- ekites, Philistines, and other nations, were common ene- mies to the Hebrews, and ravaged them, ad libitum, from an insatiable appetite for blood and murder, David had a right to extirpate them, whenever he could, without de- serving the charge of barbarity, and a blood-thirsty spirit. This was certainly the character of many of the enemies of the Hebrew nation, but can never be applicable to the Hebrews themselves. It is allowed, that they were to maintain a perpetual hostility with, and extirpate, if they could, the seven nations, because God had proscribed them, and their own prosperity, and almost being, d*epend- ed on it. But as to the Edomites, Moabites, and Ammon- ites, they were expressly forbid to meddle with them, and invade any of their territories, by beginning hostilities against them. And from the whole history of the Hebrew nation, from their first settJement in Canaan, to .heir de- striiction bv Nebuchadnezzar, there is scarce one instance to be produced, of their invading the neighbouring nations, without being first attacked by them, or of their plundering them any further than as their victories over them, gained in their own defence, gave them a right to it, by the com- mon usages and laws of war. During the period preceding the regal government, we read of nothing almost but their grievous oppressions by the Moabites, Ammonites, Amal- ekites, Midianites, Philistines, and other neighbouring nations, who forced them into dens, mountains, and strong- holds, deprived them of all manner of arms for their defence, and destroyed the increase of their lands, so that there was no sustenance for Israel, neither sh^ep, nor ox, nor ass. But we have not a single intimation of the Hebrews invading, plundering, and destroying them. And indeed it was not possible that as a nation they could, during this long period, make any considerable invasions upon the neighbouring states. For they had no kings, no settled government, no generals and captains to lead them, nor standing armies to protect ihem ; God, in a very ex- traordinary manner, and at particular seasons, being pleased to raise them up proper persons, to give them some temporary relief from those who enslaved and despoiled them; which made them at last resolve to have a king, who might be always ready to protect and defend them. They were in themselves an easy quiet people, never inured to war, employed in husbandry, and raising of cattle; and so far from being a common enemy to all the nations round them, as that they took every method to cul- tivate their friendship, taking their daughters to be their wives, and giving their daughters to their sons, forsaking their own God, and following after the gods of eA^ery neighbouring nation. And yet they were almost perpetu- ally under oppression, and their too great fondness to be on good terms with their oppressors, was the very reason why God sold them into their enemies' hands, and suffered them so often to groan, by turns, under the yoke of every petty state, that had a mind to enslave them. And as for David, he had hitherto been engaged in no wars against any of his neighbours, except two defensive ones against the Philistines; who, upon his first accession to the throne of Israel, invaded his dominions, with an intention to de-^ prive him of his kingdom, or render him and his people wholly dependant on their power. If therefore the Moab- ites joined in the confederacy with the Ammonites, Edom- ites, Philistines, and others, to extirpate the Hebrew nation, David treated themwith comparative lenity and moderation, if he cut off even two thirds of them, whom he found inarms against him ; and especially, if he put to the sword but one half of them, who intended his utter destruction, and the entire extirpation of his people. And as this is certain, that the Amalekites, Philistines, Moabites, and other nations, were perpetual and inveterate enemies to the Hebrews, and invaded them whenever they were able, the Hebrews had a right to make reprisals, to attack them on every occasion that offered, and to treat them with that severity, that was necessary to their own peace and safety for the future. I may add, what Bishop Patrick and others ob- serve, that the Jewish writers affirm, that David exercised this severity on the Moabites, because they had slain his parents and brethren, whom he committed to the custody of the king of Moab, during his exile. But I lay no great stress on this tradition, as it is wholly unsupported by the scripture history ; and because David's treatment of them is sufl5ciently justified by the ancient law of nations ; as to which my reader will be abundantly satisfied by consulting Grotius. — Chandler. The war laws of the Israelites are detailed by Moses in the twentieth chapter of Deuteronomy. I shaU at present only take notice of those particulars that relate to the course they were to pursue towards foreign nations, and postpone those that regard levies, the division of phmder, &c. until I come to treat of private law. Of a declaration of war, before proceeding to hostilities, Moses says nothing; and, therefore, seems not to have deemed it so indispensably necessary as the Romans did. The disputes concerning its necessity are so well known, that I shall not trouble my readers w^ith anv remarks upon them. At present, we do not consider this solemnity as at all essential to the lawfulness of a w^ar, but commence hostilities without any previous announcerhent of our intention, whenever we conceive that the injuries offered us require them. Moses appears (Numb, xxxi.) to have done the same; and to have 202 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 8. auacked the iVidianites, without giving them tine to arm ; and hence ( v^er. 49) he did not lose a single man, which would otherwise have been incomprehensible. The word K2:«, so o 'ten repeated in that chapter, and probably wrong pointed by the Jews, signifies in Arabic, an inroad, or attack by surprise. On the other hand, it was the injunc- tion of Moses, that a hostile city should be summoned before an attack, and if it surrendered without fighting, that its inhabitants should have their lives granted, upon the condition of becoming tributaries. If, however, a city should make resistance, then all the men m it were to be put to the*sword ; and the women and children to become captives to the Israelites. The former of these particulars, viz. massacring all the men, stamps their war law wiih a much greater degree of severity than is manifested in ours; for although we must take into the account, that among ancient nations all the males who could bear aims actually did so when it was necessary, and that there was no such distinccion between soldier and citizen as among us ; yet even in the case of a city being taken by storm, we are wont to give quarter ; and no Frenchmaia will have any anxiety to be rernmded that bois-le-d'uc forms a solitary ex- neption to this practice. Still, however, it is not conirary to the law of nature, if we get the upper hand, to kill our enemy, who either himself bears arms m order to kill us, or hires others in his room for that purpose. The Israel- ites could not regulate their conduct by our more merciful law of nationfi, which is, by several thousand years, of later date ; but they acted precisely as their vanquished foes would have done, had they been lucky enough to have been the conquerors; and they therefore merit the praise of magnanimity, if, to lessen the evils of war, we see them refraining in the smallest degree from insisting on requital of like for like to the utmost. The enemies with whom the Israelites had to do, were wont not mere'y to put the vanquished to death, but at the same time to exercise great cruelties upon them. The Bible is full of relations to this purport. Sometimes infants and sucklings were massacred, and their bodies collected into heaps; for which we find in Hebrew a particular term, v^t; some- times pregnant women were ripped up, 2 Kings viii. 12. Amos i. 13 ; sometimes people were laid upon thorns, and put to death with thrashing wains, Judg. viii. 7 — 16. Amos ]. 3. Sometimes even royal princes were burnt alive, 2 Kings iii. 27. I will not relate all the cruelties of those nations with whom the Israelites had to carry on war, and might, according to the law of nature, have repaid like for like. The law of nations, according to which the Israelites had to act, was made by those nations themselves ; for this law is founded on the manners of nations, and on the permission which we have to treat others as they treat us. If we do not choose to confine our attention to the de- tails given in scripture, we may resort to profane history, ■where w^e shall find the Romans (who behaved to their enemies much more harshly than we do) complaining of the barbarous conduct of the Carthaginians towards their prisoners ; and these Carthaginians^ were the direct de- scendants of those Canaanites, and had an Asiatic law of nations. We need not, therefore, now wonder that David (2 Sam. viii. 2) should have made the vanquished Moab- iies lie down together on the ground, and with a measuring- line have; marked off two thirds of them for death, and spared the remaining third, after being thus subjected to the fear of sharing the fate of their brethren. He acted here with more clemency than the Moj^ic law prescribed, by which he would have been justified in putting them all to death. For as to the assertion of some writers, that the severe law of Moses on this point did not extend beyond the Canaanites, it is contrary to the clearest evidence ; for Moses expressly says, (Deut. xx. 15, 16, compared with 13,) " Thus shalt thou do unto those cities which are far from thee, and not of the cities of these nations; but of those na- tions whose land Jehovah giveth thee, thou shalt let nothing that breatheth live." David acted with much greater se- verity (2 Sam. xii. 31) to the inhabitants of Rabbah, the Aramonitish capital. He put them all to death together, and that with most painful and exquisite tortures ; which, however, were not unusual in other countries of the East'. But we must consider how very different this war was from other wars. The Ammonites had not only resisted to the last extremity, (which alone by the Mosaic law was sufficient to justify the victors in putting them to death,) but they had, moreover, by their gross contempt of the am- bassadors whom David had sent with the best intentions, been guilty of a most outrageous breach of the law of nations, and manifested their implacable haired against the Israelites. They shaved half their beards, (an insult which, according lo the account of D Arvieux, the Arabs of the present day reckon as great an evil as death itself,) and then they cut off the lower half of their garments, and in this ignominious plight sent them back into their own- country. Nor was this so much the particular act of the Ammcnilish king, as of his principal subjects, who had incited him to it, (2 Sam. x. 3,) which so much the more clearly demonstrated their universal enmity against the Israelites ; and a violation of the law of nations so very unusual justly provoked them to take severer revenge, than they were wont to exercise in common wars. If we admit the maxim, that the law both of nature and nations allows me to treat my enemies as they, if victorious, would have treated me, the story in 1 Sam. xi. 2 furnishes a strong vindication o: David's conduct. These same Am- monites had, in the beginning of his predecessor's reign, been so extremely cruel as to grant to the Israelitish city, Jabesh, which they had invested, and which was inclined to surrender without resistance, no other terms of capilu- lation than that, by way of insult to the Israeliies in general, all its inhabitants should submit to have their right eyes put out. Now to an enemy of this description, and who at last seized their ambafeadors, whose persons the laws both of nations and nature hold sacred, could any punishment in use in the East, have been too crueU — We find, hov.evcr, that the character of the Ammonites was the same in every age. The prophet Amos (i. 13) speaks of them as ripping up the bellies of women with child, not in the fury of a storm, but deliberately, in order to lessen the number of the Israelites, and thus to enlarge th^ir -wn borders. If these acts of David, then, appear to js, I will not say severe, (for who will deny thatl or who that lives in our days would not wish to have acted diflferently in his place ?) but unjust, it is owing, either to our confounding the modern with the ancient law of nations, or with the law of nature itself; and thus judging of them by quite a diflTerent rule from that Avhich we are wont to apply to similar actions, which we know from our youth. I may at any rate put this question, " Has a magistrate a right to proceed more severely against a band of robbers than one nation against another, that has behaved with as much hostility and cru- elty as robbers can do ?" — If it is answered, " Yes, for the robbers are subjects ;" — then would robbers, particularly if natives of foreign lands, in order to escape painful deaths, have only to declare, that they wish to be considered not as subjects, but as enemies; since they do not generally desire the protection of the magistrate, but have their abode in the forests. But on such banditti we inflict, not merely capital punishment, but that punishment aggra- vated by torture; as, for instance, breaking on the wheel. Now, if this is not unjust, and if a robber, even though a foreigner, cannot with effect urge against it the plea of wishing to be treated as an enemy; certainly David's pro- cedure towards the Ammonites, who had in fact been more cruel to the Israelites than most modern banditti are wont to be, should not be condemned as absolutely unjust; although, no doubt, it would have been much more laud- able if he had displayed greater clemency and magnanimity. Further; as we in our childish years read the Roman au- thors, Avho think and write with great partiality for their countrymen, we are commonly impressed with very fa- vourable ideas of the moderation and equity of the Roman people in war. But these ideas are by no means just ; for the Romans, except when their own interest required the contrary, were a severe people ; and with so much the worse reason, that their wars, in which they manifested such inexorable severity, were for the most part unjust. This people, of whose war laws we are apt to think so highly, for a long time, even to the days of Caesar, ma.ssa- cred their prisoners in cold blood, whenever they survived the disgrace of the triumph ; and they very frequently put to death the magistrates and citizens of conquered cities, after making them undergo a flagellation, which, perhaps, in point of physical pain, was not different from the pun- ishments inflicted by David on the Ammonites, haccra.re corporavirgis is the phrase in which it is described by Livy, who remarks, that by reason of these inexorable ie reriliixs, Chap. 8 2 SAMUEL. mz fot which VI e know nothing in oar wars,) some cities de- j fended themselves to the last extremity, rather than submit. Thus acted the Romans towards those nations that certainly • were not Ammonites in cruelty, or in the malice of their I injuries. And if, nevertheless, not contented with keeping silence on the subject, we re-echo the Latin writers in iheir phrases of Roman justice and mercy, why should David be called an oppressor and a barbarian, because to the very ,scum of cruel and inhuman enemies, who from universal national haired had so grossly and unjustly violated the .sacred rights of ambassadors, he acted with rigour, and put them to painful deaths'? There seems here to be an unfairness in our way of judging, which David does not deserve, merely because he is an Oriental, and because on other occasions the Bible speaks so much in his praise. This severity has, nevertheless, always been a stigma on the character of David, with those who do not attend to the arbitrary and variable nature of the law of nations, and judge of it according to the very humane war laws of modern times. Hence some friends of religion have been at pains to represent his conduct in a more humane point of view than it is described in the Bible itself. The late Professor Dantz of Jena, published a Dissertation, De mitigata Davidis in Ammonitax Crudelitate, which expe- rienced the highest approbation both in and out of Germany, because people could not imagine a war law so extremely different from modern manners, as that which the common interpretation of 2 Sam. xii. 31 implies. Of that passage he gives this explanation ; that David merely condemned his Ammonitish captives to severe bodily labours; to hew- ing and sawing of wood ; to burning of bricks, and work- ing in iron mines. But how much soever this exposition may be approved, it has but little foundation: it does great violence to the Hebrew words, of which, as this is not the place to complain philologicajly, I must be satisfied with observing, that it takes them in a very unusual, and till then unknown, acceptation ; and for this no other reason is assigned, than that David had previously repented of his sins of adultery and murder; and being in a state of grace, could not be supposed capable of .such cruelties. But a proof like this, taken from the king's being in a state of regeneration, is quite indecisive. We must previously solve the question, whether, considering the times in Avhich he lived, and the character of the enemy, who had given such proofs, to what atrocities their malignant dispositions towards the Israelites would have carried them, had they been the victors, the punishment he inflicted on them was too severe ? or else from the piety of a king, I might in like manner demonstrate, in opposition to facts, that such and such malefactors were not broken on the wheel, but that they must only have gone to the wheel, in order to draw water. But allowing even that David carried sev^er- ity of punishment too far, it is entirely to be ascribed to the rude manners of his age : as in the case of still more blameless characters, even of Abraham himself, we find that the customs of their times betrayed them into sins of ignorance, although some of their contemporaries ques- tioned the lawfulness of the acts which involved those sins. It is further to be remarked, that towards the most crue' foes of the Israelites, and who had besides done himself an injury altogether unparalleled, David would have been acting with more mildness than the Mosaic law authorized, even towards any common enemy, if he had only condemn- ed the Ammonites to servile labours. And besides this, those labours which Dantz alleges, are, some of them at least, not at all suited to the circumstances of either the country or the people. Firewood, for instance, is so scarce in Palestine, that a whole people certainly could not have been converted into hewers and sawyers of wood. For the sanctuary and the altar, the Gibeonites had it already in charge to provide wood; while the common people throughout the country principally made use of straw, or dried dung, for fuel. When Solomon, many years after, made the timber required for the temple to be felled, it was bvthe heads of the remnant of the Canaanites ; and there- fore the Ammonites were not employed in it. — In Pales- tine, again, mines of different sorts were wrought. Now, of all mines, none are more wholesome to work in than those of iron ; because that metal is very friendly to the human constitution, is actuallv mixed wuth our blood, (as experiments made with blood clearly show.) is often .used in medicine, and is almost never hurtful to us, ex- cept when forged into edgetools and weapons. Hence it has been observed, that in iron-works and lorges, we gen- erally find the healthiest and longest-lived penple. Othef sorts of mines, on the contrary, by reason of the lead and arsenic which they contain, are very often unwholesome, and even fatal to life. Can it then be believed that David would have condemned a people that he wanted lo punish, to labour in iron-works, wherein they were sure to enjoy a long life of health and activity, while, perhaps, his own native subjects had to labour in unw^holesome mines Ibr the » more precious metals'? A king who had ixjines in his dominions, and wished to use them for the purjoses of punishment, would probably have heard what sorts of ihem were favourable, and what hostile to health, and not have gone so preposterously to work. The applause bestowed on this dissertation of Dantz, from the humanity it dis- played, was probably what moved the late Wahner to write a dissertation of a similar tendency, which was published at Gottingen in the year 1738, under the following title, David Moabitarum Victor crudeliuvmumero eximikir . But it could not obtain equal approbation, because in the con- duct of David towards the Moabites, 2 Sam. viii.2, there is less appearance of cruelty; inasmuch as he merely enfor- ced the war law as prescribed by Moses, and indeed far less rigorously. Wahner gives three different and new explanations of the passage, according to which none of the vanquished Moabites were put to death; but they are all somewhat forced : and there was no necessity, by a dif- ferent translation of the text, to free David from the charge of cruelty; for in putting bul two thirds of them to death, he acted unquestionably with one third more clemency than the Mosaic law required. — The war which Saul car- ried on against the Amalekites, and in which to the utmost of his power he extirpated the whole people, sparing only their king, is yet blamed, not on account of its rigour, but for the conqueror's clemency to the king, 1 Sam. xv. But I wall not by any. means adduce this for an example; but merely appeal to the precepts of Moses, the rigour of which David so much relaxed, in the cases of the Moabites. — MiCHAELlS. Ver. 13. And David gat him a name when he returned from smiting of the Syrians in the Valley of Salt, being eighteen thousand men. These great successes over the Syrians and Edomites greatly heightened the reputation and character of David; or, as the historian observes, he got himself a name when he returned from smiting the Syrians, and Edomites, in the Valley of Salt. He was regarded and celebrated by all the neighbouring princes and states, as a brave command- er, and glorious prince and conqueror. To get a name, in the eastern style, doth not mean to be called by this or the other particular name, which is a ridiculous interpre- tation of the words, but to be spoken of with admiration and praise, as an excellent prince, and a fortunate victo- rious soldier. Thus it is joined with praise, •' I will make you a name, and & praise among all people." It is said of God himself, upon account of the signs and wonders he wrought in Egypt. " Thou hast made thee a name at this day;" which our version in another place renders: " Thou hast gotten thee renown at this day." Thus David got himself a name, i. e. ^s God tells him by Nathan the prophet: " I was with thee wheresoever thou wentest, and [J have cut off all thine enemies out of thy sighi, and have made thee a great name, like unto the name of the great men that are in the earth," i. e. made thee to be esCeemed and reverenced in all countries round about, as a mighty prince and successful warrior ; a name that he must have had even from the. Syrians, and all -his enemies whom he subdued by his conduct and valour. There is som« difficulty in this short history of the con- quest nf the Edomites. In rhe book of Chronicles, it is said, that Abishai, the son of Zeruiah, smote Edom in the Valley of Salt, eighteen thousand men. 1 Chron. xviii. 12 In the 60th Psalm, Title, that when Joab returned, he smote of Edom, in the Valley of Salt, twelve thousand men. In the book of Samuel, 2 Sam. viii. 13, that David got himself a name, when he returned from smiring the Syrians, in the Valley of Salt. Pan of this difficulty is easily obviated, as the" rout and slaughter of the Edomitish army, in which they lost six thousand of their men, was mi 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 8—10. begun by David and Abishai. And as, after Joab's joining the army, twelve thousand more of tiic Edomites were cut off, the slaughter of those twelve thousand is ascribed to Joab, which, with six thousand cut off under David and Abishai, before Joab came up with his reinforcement, make up the number eighteen thousand; the whole eighteen thousand bein^ ascribed to David, as they were cut off by his army, that fought under him; and to Abishai, who was chief commander under him in this action ; so that what -was done by the one, was done by the other also. But there is also another difficulty, how to reconcile the two different accounts ; the one, that David smote the Syrians, the other, that he smote the Edomites, in the Valley of Salt. The altering the pointing of the words, as we have them in Samuel, and the repeating a single word, airo koivov, from the first part of the account, will entirely remove this difficulty ; and I render the passage thus: David, got himself a nanie, when he returned from smiting the Syrians, in the Valley of Salt, bv smiting eighteen thousand men. Or, he got himself a name in the Valley of Salt, by smiting eighteen thousand men, after he returned from srniting the Syrians. And without this repetition of the word hod smiting, or nan^ by smiting, the construction and sense is quite imperfect. Le Clerc, F. Houbigant, and others, add this supplement, and this alone renders all the other emendations of the learned Father quite unnecessary. The version of the Vulg. Latin conftrms the interpretation, which thus renders the place : I^ecit sibi quoque David nomen cum, reverteretur capta Syria, in valle Salinarum, ccejis decern et octo millibus. " David also got him a name when he returned from the capture of Syria, having slain eighteen thousand men." — Chandler. Ver. 16. And Jehoshaphat, the son of Ahilud, was recorder. That is, as is generally believed,- remembrancer or writer of chronicles, an employment of no mean estima- tion in the eastern world, where it was customary with kings to keep daily registers of all the transactions of their reign : and a trust, which, whoever discharged to purpose, must be let into the true springi and secrets of action, and consequently must be received into the utmost confidence. — Border. Ver. 18. And Benaiah, the son of Jehoiada, was over both the Cherethites and the Pelethites : and David's sons were chief rulers. These guards are called in the text, the Cherethites and the Pelethites, but what they were is variously conjectured. That they were soldiers is evident from their being men- tioned as present at the proclamation of King Solomon against Adonijah, which could not evidently have been done without some armed force to protect the persons that proclaimed him: and that they were not common soldiers, but the constant guards of David's person, is manifest from the title of EM/zaro^tJAax-Ej, keepers of the body, which Josephus gives them. Some are of opinion that they were men of gigantic stature; but we find no ground for that, though they were doubtless proper and robust men, (as we speak,) and of known fidelity to their prince, 2 Sam. XV. 18, and xx. 7. Others again think that they were Philistines ; but it is hardly supposable, that David would have any of these hated, uncircumcised people to be his bodyguard ; neither can we believe that Israelitish soldiers would have took it patiently to see foreigners of that nation fiut in such places of honour and trust. It is much more ikely, then, tbat they were some select men of the tribe of Judah, which had their names from the families they sprung from, one of which is mentioned, 1 Sam. xxx. 14, and the other, 1 Chron. ii. 33, unless we will come into the notion of others, who, as they find that there were men of this denomination among the Philistines, think that these guards of David's, which were originally of his own tribe, had these exotic names given them from some notable exploit or signal victory gained over the Philistines of this name, as (in 1 Sam. xxx. 14) we have express mention of one action against them. — Stackhouse. CHAPTER IX. Ver. 11. Then said Ziba unto the king, Accord- ing to all that my lord the king hath command- ed his servant, so shall thy servant do. As for Mephibosheth, said the king, he shall eat at my table, as one of the king's sons. See on 2 Kings 9. 11. CHAPTER X. Ver. 4. Wherefore Hanun took David's servants, and shaved off the one half of their beards, and cut off their garments in the middle, even to their buttocks, and sent them away. This was one of the greatest indignities that the malice of man could invent in those countries, where all people thought their hair so great an ornament, that some would have rather submitted to die, than part with it. What a foul disgrace and heavy punishment this was accounted in ancient times, we may learn from Nicholaus Damascenus, as mentioned by Stobaeus, (Tit. 42.) who says, that among the Indians the king commanded the greatest offenders to be shaven, as the heaviest punishment that he could inflict upon them ; and, to the like purpose, Plutarch (in Egesil) tells us, that, whenever a soldier, among the Lacedemo- nians, was convicted of cowardice, he was obliged to go with one part of his upper lip shaved, and the other not. Nay, even at this day, no greater indignity can be offered to a man of Persia, than to cause his beard to be shaved ; and therefore, Tavernier, in his travels, relates the story, that when the Sophi caused an ambassador of Aurengzeb's to be used in this manner, telling him that he was not wor- thy to wear a beard, the emperor (even in the manner as David here did) most highly resented the affront that was done to him in the person of his ambassador. And, as shaving David's ambassadors was deservedly accounted a grievous affront, so the cutting off half the beard (which made them look still more ridiculous) was a great addition to it, where beards were held in great veneration; and where long habits down to the heels were worn, especially by persons of distinction, without any breeches or drawers, the cutting their garments, even to the middle, thereby to expose their nakedness, was such a brutal and shameless insult, as would badly become a man of David's martial spirit, and just sentiments of honour, to have tamely passed by. — Stackhouse. The customs of nations in respect to this part of the hu- man countenance, have differed, and still do differ, so wide- ly, that it is not easy, among us, who treat the beard as an encumbrance, to coiiceive properly of the importance which is attached to it in the East. The Levitical laws have noticed the beard, but the terms in which most of them are expressed, are somewhat obscure; i. e. they are obscure to us, by the very reason of their being familiar to the persons to whom they were addressed. Perhaps the following quota- tions may contribute to throw a light, at least upon some of ^ them : " The first care of an Ottoman prince, when he comes to the throne, is, to let his beard gro^o, to which Sultan Mus- tapha added, the dying of it black, in order that it might be more apparent on the day of his first appearance, when he was to gird on the sabre ; a ceremony by which he takes possession of the throne, and answering the corona- tion among us." (Baron du Tott.) So, De la Motraye tells us, " that the new Sultan's beard had not been per- mitted to grow, but only since he had been proclaimed emperor : and was very short, it being customary to shave the Ottoman princes, as a mark of their subjection to the reigning emperor," " In the year 1764, Kerim Khan sent to demand payment of the tribute due for his possessions in Kermesir : but, Mir Mahenna maltreated the officer who was sent on the errand, and caused his beard to be cut of. Kerim Khan then sent a strong army against him, which conquered Bender Risk, and all the territories of Mir Ma- henna." (Niebuhr.) This will remind the reader of the in- sult offered to the ambassadors of David, by Hanun, (2 Sam. X.) which insult, however, seems to have had a peculiarity m it— of shaving one half of the beard ; i. e. the beard on one side of the face. On this subject, we iran'^late from Niebuhr (French edit.) the following remarks: "The Orientals have divers manners of letting the beard grow; the .Tews, in Turkey, Arabia, and Persia, preserve iheir beard from their youth; and it differs from that of the Christians and Mohammedans, in that they do not shave it Chap. 10. 2 SAMUEL. 205 either at the aers, or the temples. The Arabs keep their whiskers very short ; some cut them off entirely; but they never shave off the beard. In the mountains of Yemen, where strangers are seldom seen, it is a disgrace to appear shaven ; they supposed our European servant, who had only whiskers, had committed some crime, for which we had punished him, by cutting off his beard. On the contrary, the Turks have commonly long whiskers ; the beard among them is a mark of honour. The slaves and certain domes- tics of the great lords, are forced to cut it off, and dare not keep any part of it, but whiskers ; the Persians have long whiskers, and clip their beard short with scissors, which has an unpleasant appearance to strangers. The Kurdes shave the beard, but leave the whiskers, and a band of hair on the cheeks." " The true Arabs have black beards, yet some old men die their white beards red ; but this is thought to be to hide their age ; and is rather blamed than praised. The Persians blacken their beards much more ; and, probably, do so to extreme old age, in order to pass for younger than they really are. The Tuiks do the same in some cases. [How differently Solomon thought ! Prov. XX. 29, ' The glory of young men is their strength, and the beauty of old men is the gray head.'] — When the younger Turks, after having been shaven, let their beards grow, they recite afatha, [or kind of prayer,] which is considered as a vow never to cut it off; and when any one cuts off his beard, he maybe very severely punished, (at Basra, at least, to 300 blows with a stick.) He would also be the laughing-stock of those of his faith. A Mohammedan, at Basra, having shaved his beard when drunk, fled secretly to India, not daring to return, for fear of public scorn, and judicial punishment." " Although the Hebrews took great care of their beards, to fashion them when they were not in mourning, and on the contrary, did not trim them when they were in mourn- ing, yet I do not observe that their regard for them amount- ed to any veneration for their beard. On the contrary, the Arabians have so much respect for their beards, that they look on them as sacred ornaments given by God, to distin- guish them from women. They never shave them : no- thing can be more infamous thaii for a man to be shaved ; they make the preservation of their beards a capital point of religion, Tsecause Mohammed never cut off his : it is likewise a mark of authority and liberty among them, as well as among the Turks; "the Persians, who clip them, and shave above the jaw, are reputed heretics. The razor is never drawn over the grand seignior's face : they who serve in the seraglio, have their beard shaved, as a sign of servitude : they do not suffer it to grow till the sultan has set them at liberty, which is bestowed as a reward upon them, and is always accompanied with some emploA'menl. Unmarried young men may cut their beards ; but" when married, especially if parents, they forbear doing so, to yhow that they are become wiser, have renounced the van- ides of youth," and think now of superior things. When they comb their beards, they hold a handkerchief on their knees, and gather carefully the hairs that fall : and when they have got together a proper quantity, they fold them up in paper, and carry them to the place" where they bury the dead. Among them it is more infamous for any one to have his beard cut off, than among us to be publicly whipped, or branded with a hot iron. Many men in that country would prefer death to such a punishment. The wives kiss their husbands' beards, and children their fa- thers', when they come to salute them : the men kiss one another's beards reciprocally, when they salute in the streets, or come from a journey. — They say, that the beard is the perfection of the human face, which would be more disfis-nred by having this cut off, than by losing the nose. ".They admire and envy those, who have fine beards : ' Pray do but see,' they cry, ' that beard ; the very sight of it would persuade any one, that he, to whom it belongs, is an honest man-.' If anybody with a fine beard is guilty of an unbecoming action, 'What a disadvantage is this,' they say, ' to such a beard ! How much such a beard is to be pitied!' If thev would correct anv one's mistakes, they will tell him, ' For shame of your beard ! Does not the confusion that follows light on your beard 1' If they en- treat any one, or use oaths in affirming or denying any thing, they say, ' I conjure you by your heard, — by the life of your beard, — to grant me this,' — or, 'by your beard, -his is, or is not, so.' They say further, in the way of ac- knowledgment, ' May God preserve your blessed beard ! May God pour out his blessings on your bea^d'' And, in comparisons, ' This is more valuable than one's beard.' " MoBurs des Arabes, par M. D'Arvieux, chap. vii. These accounts may contribute to illustrate several passages oi scripture. The dishonour done by David to his beard, of letting his spittle fall on it, (1 Sam. xxi, 13,) seems at once to have convinced Achish of his being distempered : q. d. " No man in good health, of body and mind, would thus defile what we esteem so honourable as his beard." If the beard be thus venerated, we perceive the import of Mephibosheth's neglect, in his not trimming it, 2 Sam. xix. 24. We con- ceive, also, that after the information given us, as above, that men kiss one another's beards, when they salute in the streets, or when one of them is lately covie from a jovrney ; we may discover traces of deeper dissimulation in the be- haviour of Joab to Amasa (2 Sam. xx. 9) than we have heretofore noticed : " And Joab held in his right hand the beard of Amasa, that he might give it a Jdss." — No wonder then, that while this act of friendship, of gratulation after long absence, occupied Amasa's attention, he did not per- ceive the sword that was in Jonb's left hand. The action of Joab was, indeed, a high compliment, but neither sus- picious nor unusual; and to this compliment Amasa pay- mg attention, and, no doubt, returning it with answerable politeness, he could little expect the fatal event that Joab's perfidy produced. Was the behaviour of Judas to Jesus something like this behaviour of Joab to Amasa'? — a wor- thy example worthily imitated ! — With this idea in our minds, let us hear the Evangelists relate the story ; Matt, xxvi. 49, " And coming directly to Jesus, he said. Hail [joy to thee] Rabbi ! and kissed him :" so says Mark xiv. 45. But Luke seems to imply, that Judas observed a more respectful manner, in his salutation. Jesus, according to Matthew, before he received the kiss from Judas, had time to say, " Friend [in what manner] unto what purpose art thou come 1" And while Judas was kissing him — suppose his beard — Jesus might easily, and very aptly express him- self, as Luke relates, " Ah ! Judas, betrayest thou the Son of Man by a kiss 7" The cutting off the beard is mention- ed (Isaiah xv. 2) as a token- of mourning; and as such it appears to be very expressive, Jer. xli. 5 : " Fourscore men came from Samaria, having their beards shaven, and their clothes rent." — See, also, chap, xlviii. 37. Is not this cus- tom somewhat illustrated by the idea which the Arabs at- tached to the shaven servant of Niebuhr, i. e. as a kind ot pimishment suffered for guilt, expressed or implied?.— Taylor in Calmet. While the Orientals had their emblems of honour, and tokens of regard, they had also peculiar customs expressive of contempt or dislike ; of which the first I shall mention is cutting off the beard. Even to talk disrespectfully of a Persian's beard, is the greatest insult that can be offered to him, and an attempt to touch it would probably be followed by the instant death of the offender. Cutting" off the beard is reckoned so great a mark of infamy among the Arabs, that many of them would prefer death to such a dishonour. ' They set the highest value upon this appurtenance of the male ; for when they would express their value for a thing, they say it is worth rnore than his beard ; they even beg for the sake of it, " By your beard, by the life of your beard, do." — Paxton. When Peter the Great attempted to civilize the Russians, and introduced the manners and fashions of the more re- fined parts of Europe, nothing met with more opposition than the cutting off their beards, and many of those who were obliged to comply with this command, testified such great veneration for their beards, as to order them to be buried with them. Irwin also, in his voyage up the Red Sea, says, that at signing a treaty of peace with the vizier of Yambo, they swore by their beards, the most solemn oath they can take. D'Arvieux gives a remarkable instance of an Arab, who, having received a wound in his jaw, chose to hazard his life rather than to suffer his surgeon to take off his beard. — Burder. This shows, according to the oriental mode of thinking, the magnitude of the affront which Hanan offered to the ambassadors of David, when he took them and shaved ofl the one half of their beards. It was still, in times compar- atively modern, the greatest indignity that can be offered in Persia. Shah Abbas, king of that country, enraged that the emperor of Hindostan had inadvertently addressed nimby 206 2 SAMUEL. Chap. U. a title far inferior to that of the great Shah-in-Shah, or king of kings, ordered the beards of the ambassadors to be shaved off, and sent them home to their master. This ignominious treatment discovers also the propriety and force of the type of hair in the prophecies of Ezekiel ; where the inhabitants af Jerusalem are compared to the hair of his head and beard, to intimate that they had been as dear to God as the beard was to the Jews ; yet for their wickedness they should be cut off and destroyed. — Paxton. Ver. 5. When they told it unto David, he sent to meet them, because the men were greatly- ashamed : and the king said, Tarry at Jericho until your beards be grown, and then return. It is customary to shave the Ottoman princes, as a mark of their subjection to the reigning emperor. In the moun- tains of Yemen, where strangers are seldom seen, it is a disgrace to appear shaven. The beard is a mark of au- thority and liberty among the Mohammedans, as well as among the Turks: the Persians, who clip the beard, and shave above the jaw, are reputed heretics. They who serve in the seraglio, have thej^r beards shaven as a sign of servitude : they do not suffer it to grow till the sultan has set them at liberty. Among the Arabians it is more infa- mous for any one to have his beard cut off, than among us to be publicly whipped, or branded with a hot iron. Many in that country would prefer death to such a punish- nient.— (Niebuhr.) At length Ibrahim Bey suffered Ali, his page, to let his beard grow, that is to say, gave him his freedom ; for, among the Turks, to want mustaches and a beard is thought only fit for slaves and women ; and hence arises the unfavourable impression they receive on the first sig:ht of a European. (Volney.) — Burder. Ver. 9. When Joab saw that the front of the battle was against him before and behind, he chose of all the choice men of Israel, and put them in array against the Syrians: 10. And the rest of the people he delivered into the hand of Abishai his brother, that he might put them in array against the children of Ammon. Immediately before the signal was given, and sometimes in the heat of battle, the general of a Grecian army made an oration to his troops, in which he briefly slated the motives that ought to animate their bosoms; and exhorted them to exert their utmost force and vigour against the enemy. The success which sometimes attended these harangues was wonderful; the soldiers, animated with fresh life and courage, returned to the charge, retrieved in an instant their affairs, which were in a declining and almost desperate condition, and repulsed those very ene- mies by whom they had been often defeated. Several in- stances of this might be quoted from Roman and Grecian history, but few are more remarkable than that of Tyrtceus, the lame Athenian poet, to whom the command of the Spal"tan army was given in one of the Messenian wars. The Spartans had at that time suffered great losses in many encounters ; and all their stratagems proved ineffectual, so that they began to despair almost of success, when the poet, by his lectures on honour and courage, delivered in moving verse to the army, ravished them to such a degree with the thoughts of dying for their country, that, rushing on with a furious transport to meet their enemies, they gave them an entire overthrow, and by one decisive battle brought the war to a happy conclusion. Such military harangue.s, especiallv in very trying circumstances, are perfectly nat- ural, and may be found perhaps in the records of "every nation. The history of Joab, the commander-in-chief of David's armies, furnishes a striking instance: "When Joab saw that the front of the battle was against him, before and behind, he chose of all the choice men of Israel, and put them in array against the Syrians; and the rest of the peopl" he delivered into the hand of Abishai his brother, that he mia;ht put them marrav against the children of Am- mon. And he said. If the Svriansbe too strong for me, then thou sha.lt help me; but if the children of Ammon be too s'ron? for thee, then I will come and help thee. Be of jTood cour^sc, and let us play the men for our people, and for the cities of our God; and the Lord do that which seemeth good in his sight." In a succeedmg age, the king of Judah addressed his troops, before they marched against the confederate armies of Moab and Ammon, in terms be- coming the chief magistrate of a holy nation, and calcula- ted to make a deep impression on their minds : " And as they went forth, Jehoshaphat stood and said. Hear me, O Judah, and ye inhabitants of Jerusalem: Believe in the Lord your God, so shall ye be established; believe his prophets, so shall ye prosper." To express his own con- fidence in the protection of Jehovah, and to inspire his army with the same sentiments, after consulting with the people, he "appointed singers unto the Lord, and that should praise the beauty of holiness, as they went out be- fore the army, and to say. Praise the Lord, for his mercy endureth for ever." This pious conduct obtained the ap- probation of the living and true God, who rewarded the cheerful reliance of his people with a complete victory over their enemies, unattended by loss or danger to them ; for " when they began to praise, the Lord turned every man's sword against his fellow," in the camp of the confed- erates, till not one escaped. Animated with joy and grati- tude for so great a deliverance, the pious king returned to Jerusalem at the head of his troops, preceded by a numer- ous band of music, celebrating the praises of the God of battles. A custom not unlike this, and perhaps derived from some imperfect tradition of it, long prevailed in the states of Greece. Before they joined battle, they sung a hymn to the god of war, called naiav en^arripiog -, and when victory declared in their favour, they sung another to Apollo, termed iraiav eiriviKios. — Paxton. CHAPTER XI. Ver. 1. And it came to pass, after the year was expired, at the time when kings go forth td battle, that David sent Joab, and his servants with him, and all Israel. The most usual time of commencing military operations was at the return of spring ; the hardships of a wintei campaign were then unknown. In the beginning of spring, says Josephus, David sent forth his commander-in-chief Joab, to make war with the Ammonites. In another part of his works, he says, that as soon as spring was begun, Adad levied and led forth his army agamst the Hebre\\s. Antiochus also prepared to invade Judea at the first ap- pearance of spring; and Vespasian, earnest to put an end to the war in Judea, marched with his whole army to Anti- palris, at the commencement of the same season. The sacred historian seems to suppose, that there was one par- ticular time of the year to which the operations of war were commonly limited : " And it came to pass, after the year was expired, at the time kings go forth to battle, that David sent Joab and his servants and all' Israel, and they destroyed the children of Ammon and besieged Kabbah." The kings and armies of the East, says Chardin, do not march but when there is grass, and when they can en- camp, which time is April. But in modern times, this rule is disregarded, and the history of the crusades records expeditions and battles in every month of the year. — Pax- ton. Ver. 2. And it came to pass in an evening-tide, that David arose from off his bed, and walked upon the roof of the king's house : and from the roof he saw a woman washing herself: and the woman was very beautiful to look upon. The place of greatest attraction to an oriental taste cer- tainly was the summer bath. It seemed to comprise every thing of seclusion, elegance, and that luxurious enjoyment which has too often been the chief occupation of some Asiatic princes. This bath, saloon, or court, is circular, with avast basin in its centre, of pure white marble, of the same shape, and about sixty or seventy feet in diameter. This is filled with the clearest water, sparkling in the sun, for its only canopy is the vault of heaven ; but rose-trees, with other pendent shrubs, bearing flowers, cluster near it: and at limes their waving branches throw a beautifully quivering shade over the excessive brightness of the water. Round the sides of the court are two ranges, one above the other, of little chambers, looking towards the bath, and fur- Chap. 11. 2 SAMUEL. 207 nished with every refinement of the harem. These are for the accommociation of the ladies who accompany the shah during his occasional sojourns at the Negauristan. They undress or repose in these before or after the delight of bathing: for so fond are they of this luxury, they remain in the water for hours; and sometimes, when the heat is very relaxing, come out more dead than alive. But in this deliglitful recess, the waters flow through the basin by a constant spring; thus renewing the body's vigour by their bracing coolness: and enchantingly refreshing the air, which the stin's influence, and the thousand flowers breath- ing around, might otherwise render oppressive with their incense. The royal master of this Hortus Adonidis, fre- quently takes his noonday repose in one of the upper chambers which encircle the saloons of the bath: and, if he be inclined, he has only to turn his eyes to the scene below, to see the loveliest objects of his tenderness, sporting like Naiads amidst the crystal streams, and glowing with all the bloom and brilliancy which belongs to Asiatic youth. In such a bath court it is probable that Bathshebawas seen by the enamoured king of Israel. As he was walking at evening-tide on the roof of his palace, he might undesign- edly have strolled far enough to overlook the androon of his women, where the beautiful wife of Uriah, visiting the royal wives, might have joined them, as was often the cus- tom in those countries, in the delights of the bath. — Sir R. K. Porter. The following history is, in some points, an accurate counterpart to that of David. " Nour Jehan signifies the light of the world; she was also called Nour Mahl, or the light of the seraglio : she was wife to one Sher Afkan Khan, of a Turcoman family, who came from Persia to Hindostan in very indifferent" circumstances. As she was exquisitely beautiful, of great wit, and an elegant poetess, Jehangnire, the sultan, was resolved to take her to himself He sent her husband, who was esteemed the bravest man in his service, with some troops, to command in Bengal, and afterward sent another with a greater force to cut him off". When he was killed, Nour Jehan was soon pre- vailed upon to become an empress. The coin struck in Jehanguire's reign, with the signs of the zodiac, were not, as is usually thought in Europe, done by his empress's or- der ; nor did she reign one day, as the common opinion is, but she ruled the person who reigned for above twelve years." (Fraser.)— Burder. Ver. 4. And David sent messengers and took her : and she came in unto him, and he lay with her ; (for she was purified from her Uri- el eanness ;) and she returned unto her house. The kings of Israel appear to have taken their wives with very great ease. This is quite con,sistent with the ac- count given in general of the manner in which eastern princes form matrimonial alliances. "The king, in his marriage, uses no other ceremony than this : he sends an azagi to the house where the lady lives, where the officer announces to her, it is the king's pleasure that she should remove instantly to the palace. She then dresses herself in the best manner, and immediately obeys. Thencefor- ward he assigns her an apartment in the palace, and gives her a house elsewhere in any part she chooses. Then when he makes her Ueghe, it seems to be the nearest re- semblance to marriage; for whether in the court or the camp, he orders one of the judges to pronounce in his pres- eiKte, that he, the king, has chosen his handmaid, naming her, for his queen : upon which the crown is put on her head, but she is not anointed."— Burder. Ver. 25. Then David said unto the messenger, Thus shalt thou say unto Joab, Let not this thing displease thee, for the sword devoureth one as well as another: make thy battle more strong against the city, and overthrow it ; and encourage thou him. It has been asserted, of the portion of scripture before us, 4iat it tells a tale of little else besides cruelties and crimes, ' many of them perpetrated by David himself; and it has been triumphantly demanded how a man stained with so I many vices, can, without impiety, be styled a " man after God's own heart." We will endeavour to meet the objec- tion, because under it is comprehended all that the infidel is justified in urging against the credibility of the narrative. The peculiar term, of which a use so unworthy is made, was applied, it will be recollected, to David, while that per- sonage yet lived the life of a private man, and kept his fa- ther's sheep. It was employed, moreover, by God himself, as distinguishing the future from the present king of Israel, not in their individual characters, as members of the great family of mankind, but as the chief rulers of God's chosen people. To understand its real import, therefore, all that seems necessary is, to ascertain the particular duties of the kings of Israel ; and no man who is aware that these mon- archs filled, in the strictest sense of the phrase, the station of Jehovah's vicegerents, can for a moment be at a loss in effecting that discovery. The kings of Israel were placed upon the throne, for the purpose of administering the Di- vme law, as that had been given through Moses. In an es- pecial degree, it was their duty to preserve the people pure from the guilt of idolatry ; idolatry being, among the He- brews, a crime equivalent to high-treason among us;^ while, on all occasions, whether of foreign war or domes- tic arrangements, they were bound to act in strict obedi- ence to the will of God, as that might be from time to time revealed to them. Whether this should be done by Urim, by the voice of a prophet, or some palpable and immediate vision, the king of Israel was equally bound to obey ; and as long as he did obey, literally, fully, and cheerfully, he was, in his public capacity, a man after God's own heart. An ordinary attentive perusal of the preceding pages will show, that David, as compared with Saul, (and it is only % with reference to such comparison, that the phrase under review ought to be regarded,) was strictly worthy of the honourable title bestowed upon him. Whatever his private vices might be, in all public matters his obedience to God's laws was complete ; indeed, he never speaks of himself in any other language than as the servant or minister of Je- hovah. No individual among all that reigned in Jerusalem ever exhibited greater zeal against idolatry ; of the Mosaic code he was, in his official capacity, uniformly observant ; and to every command of God, bywhomsoever conveyed, he paid strict attention. Such was by no means the case with Saul, as his assumption of the priestly office, and his, conduct towards the Amalekites, demonstrate ; and it was simply to distinguish him from his predecessor, as one on whose steady devotion to Divine wishes reliance could be placed, that God spoke of him to Samuel, in the terms so frequently misinterpreted. If it be further urged that Da- vid's moral conduct was far from being perfect ; that his treatment of Joab, after the mUrder of Abner, w^as weak ; his behaviour to the captive Ammonites barbarous; Im conduct in the case of Uriah, the Hittite, infamous ; and his general treatment of his children without excuse; wc have no wish, as we profess not to have the power, absolute- ly to deny the assertions. His receiving: Joab into favour, while his hands were red with the blood of Abner, m.ay be pronounced as an act of weakness; yet it was such ari act as any other person, in his circumstances, would h»vebeen apt to perform. Joab was a distinguished soldier, highly esteemed by the troops, and possessed of great influence in the nation; it would have been the height of imprudence, had David, situated as he was, made such a man his ene- my; but that he wholly disapproved of the treacherous deed which Joab had done, he took every conceivable means to demonstrate. He conferred a species of public funeral upon the murdered man, and attended it in person, as chief mourner. The treatment of the captive Ammonites w^as doubtless exceedingly cruel ; yet its cruelty may admit of some extenuation, provided we take one or tM'o matters, as they deserve to be taken, into consideration. In the first place, the age was a barbarous one, and from the in- fluence of the times in which he lived, it would be folly to expect that David could be free. In the next place,' the tortures inflicted upon the Ammonites are not to oe under- stood as heaped indiscriminately upon the whole body of the people. The magistrates and principal men were alone ".put under saws and harrows of iron, and made to pass through the brick-kiln." And these suffered a fate so hor- rible, only in retaliation for similar excesses committed by their order upon certain Hebrew prisoners. Besides, the gross and unprovoked indignities heaped upon David's am- 208 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 11. bassadors might well inflame his fury to the highest pitch ; since then, even more conspicuously than now, the per- sons of envoys were considered sacred, especially in the East. Without, therefore, attempting to excuse such ac- tions, as no enlightened person would now. under any prov- ocation, perpetrate, we must nevertheless repeat, that Da- vid's treatment of the Ammonites was not absolutely devoid of extenuating circumstances ; an assertion which cannot, we feel, be hazarded in reference to that monarch's beha- viour towards Uriah the Hittite. Perhaps there is not recorded in any volume & series of crimes more gross or inexcusable than those of which we are now bound to take notice. Adultery and murder are terms too mild for them, inasmuch as the particular acts of adultery and murder implied other otfences scarcely less heinous than them- selves. The woman abused by David was the wife of a proselyte from a heathen nation, whom it was to the inter- est arid honour of the true religion for the chosen head of God's nation to treat with marked delicacy. He was, more- over, a brave and faithful soldier; so brave and zealous in his master's service, that even when summoned by the king himself to the capital, he refused to indulge in its lux- uries, while his comrades were exposed to the hardships of war. This man David would have vitally wronged, by introducing into his family a child of which the king him- self Avas the father ; and failing in the accomplishment of a design so iniquitous, he coolly devised his death. Again, that the deed might be done without bringing disgrace upon himself, he ordered his general to place this gallant soldier in a post of danger, and, deserting him there, to leave him to his fate ; and when all had befallen as he wished, his observation was, that " the sword devoured one as well as another." These several occurrences, summed up, as they were, by the abrupt and shameless marriage of Bathsheba, combine to complete a concatenation of crimes, of which it is impossible to speak or think without horror ; yet is there nothing connected with them, in the slightest degree, mischievous to the credibility or consistency of scripture. It cannot, with any truth, be asserted, that God either was, or is represented to have been, a party to these black deeds. So far is this .from being the case, that we find a prophet sent expressly to the sinful monarch, to point out to nim the enormity of his offences, and to assure him of a punish- ment, ">grievous in proportion to the degree of defilement which he had contracted. But as David's crimes had been committed in his private capacity, so his punishment was made to affect his private fortunes. His own children be- came the instruments of God's anger, and heavier domestic calamities than fell upon him, no man, perhaps has ever endured. His only daughter (and, as such, doubtless his favourite child) is ravished by her brother Amnon ; the ravisher is murdered by his brother Absalom ; Absalom revolts against his father, drives him from his capital, and is finally slain in battle fighting against him. If there be not in this enough to vindicate the honour of God, we know not where marks of Divine displeasure are to be looked for ; and as to the credibility of the scriptural narrative, that appears to be strengthened, rather than weakened, by the detail of David's fall. No fictitious writer would have represented one whom he had already designated as *' a man after God's own heart," and whom he evidently de- sires his readers to regard with peculiar reverence, as a murderer and adulterer. It is the province of a narrator of facts alone to speak of men as they were, by exposing the vices and follies even of his principal heroes ; nor is the history without its effect as a great moral warning. It teaches the important lesson, that the commission of one crime seldom, if ever, fails to lead to the commission of others; while it furnishes a memorable example of the clemency which forbids any sinner to despair, or regard himself as beyond the pale of mercy. Of David's conduct towards his children, it seems to us little better than a waste of time to set up either an explanation or a defence. Ex- travagantly partial to them he doubtless was; so partial as to pass over in their behaviour crimes which, we can hard- ly believe, would have been passed by, had others besides the members of his own family committed them. It is indeed true, that the law of Moses, by which alone David pro- fessed to be guided, is not very explicit as to the punish- ment which ougfht to have been awarded to Amnon ; but the truth we suspect to be, as Josephus has given it, that David abstained from bringing him to a public trial after his outrage to Tamar, because the feelings of the father prevailed over those of the magistrate. In like manner, his pardoning Absalom's crime, in defiance of the law, which expressly enjoins blood to be shed for blood, without redemption, is open to a similar charge; yet even here, there is more to be urged in the king's defence, than the mere operation of natural affection. Absalom took shelter at a foreign court immediately on the perpetration of the murder ; it might not be in David's power to force his sur- render, and hence the only alternative was, to leave him in exile, among heathen, at the rfiranifest hazard of the cor- ruption of his religious principles, or to permit his return to Jerusalem, and ultimately to receive him into favour. With respect, again, to his subsequent indulgence of that prince — an indulgence to which, in some degree, his insur- rection deserves to be traced back — we see in it only one more proof of that amiable weakness which characterized all the monarch's dealings towards his family, his fondness for every member of which unquestionably led him into errors, if not of the heart, at all events of the head. Such errors, however, leave but trivial blots upon the general reputation of any man. They proceed from a good princi- ple, even when carried to weakness, and will be sought for in vain among the utterly heartless, profligate, or selfish ; and as David is not represented in scripture as either a perfect saint or a perfect hero, we see no reason why his strength of mind, more than his moral character, should be vindicated from all the charges which may be brought against it. — Gleig. Ver. 25. Then David said unto the messenger, Thus shalt thou say unto Joab, Let not this thing displease thee, for the sword devoureth one as well as another : make thy battle more strong against the city, and overthrow it ; and encourage thou him. 26. And w^hen the wife of Uriah heard that Uriah her husband was dead, she mourned for her husband. 27. And when the mourning was passed, David sent and fetched her to his house, and she became his Avife, and bare him a son. But the thing that David had done displeased the Lord. This is the account of David's fall, as related in scrip- ture; a fall attended with numerpus circumstances of heinous aggravation, an^ the attempt to vindicate his con- duct, in any of the principal parts of this transaction, would be injurious to the laws of truth and virtue. But if there are any circumstances of alleviation, that can be fairly alleged, justice and candour require that they should be mentioned ; as well as to own and admit others, that heighten his fault, and render him inexcusable. And I think there cannot be a greater pleasure, than what arises to a good mind, from being able, in some measure, to apologize for actions, in some particulars of them, which upon the whole are bad, and extenuate that guilt, where it can be fairly done, which, as far as real, ought neither to be concealed nor defended. There are some crimes pecu- liarly aggravated by previous deliberate steps that men take to commit them; when they lay schemes'to gratify bad passions, and accomplish purposes they know to be injurious and dishonourable. David, in the beginning of this transaction, seems to be entirely free from every charge of this kind. He did not so much as know who she was, much less that she was a married woman, when he first casually saw her; and the passion he conceived for her, might, for any thing he then knew, be lawful, and such as he might, without any oflfence, allow himself in the gratifi- cation of And this would have been the case, under the dispensation in which he lived, had she been a single person. David therefore, though very imprudently, and I think in some degree criminally, did not deliberate upon an affair, which he saw no immediate reason to prohibit him from pursuing; and thereby heightened that inclina- tion, which he ought to have checked, as a good man, till . he was sure he had a right to indulge it. By not doing this, it became too strong for his management; and Avhen he had been informed who she was, yet fired with tho imagination, that the beautiful object he beheld had raised Chaa 11. 2 SAMUEL. 209 in his mind, all other considerations at last gave way, and he immediately resolved to gratify his desires, at the ex- pense of his conscience, honour, and duty. He instantly sends for Bathsheba, she immediately complied with him, and the whole affair seems to have been completed the very evening it was begun. Every one must see, that as David had but little time for deliberation, it was not very likely, that in the small interval, between the rise of his passion, and the gratifying it, one in his circumstances should be cool enough to use that deliberation, which was necessary to bring him to himself, and restrain him from the crime he was hurried on to commit ; and that therefore his sin, thus far, had not that aggravation which it would have had, if there had been more time and leisure for him to reflect, and had he pursued his criminal inclinations, after having seriously and calmly weighed the nature and consequences of what he was about to do, and used, as too many others in like cases have done, fraud, perfidy, and force, to gratify them. To say there was no time for any deliberation, may be saying too much ; for there is scarce any sin so suddenly committed, but there are some mo- ments for reflection ; but, in some circumstances, men may be so hurried away by a sudden gust of passion, as that they may be wholly incapacitated by it, rightly to improve those moments. David had no time to prevent the first rise of his passion. It was as instantaneous as the sight, and he might not think himself obliged to suppress it, till after he knew Bathsheba was Uriah's wife ; so that all the interval he could have for reflection was only that between his knowing who she was, and his actually possessing her; an interval too entirely engrossed by imagination and de- sire, to leave room suflicient for the exercise of reason, or the influence of any good principles to restrain him. If David and Bathsheba had been casually together, a more sudden and violent gust of passion could not have hurried him away, without allowing him some time for delibera- tion, than what the altitude, in which he first saw her, would have naturally excited, and did actually excite ; which swept away all consideration and reflection before it, and drove him down a precipice, that wellnigh proved his absolute destruction. I cannot help adding, that Bath- sheba herself seems to have too easily yielded to the king's inclination, and thereby rendered it almost impossible for him to suppress it. For the history informs us, that David " sent messengers, and he received her, and she came in unto him, and he lay with her." Her compliance seems voluntary, unforced, immediate. But she went, met his passion, indulged it, without, as appears, any reluctance, without remonstrating against David's attempt upon her honour ; and thereby prevented those reflections, that her denial and resistance might have occasioned in him, and that might have made him sensibleof the enormity of the crime, and preserved him from the commission of it. And how great soever this sin was, David is not the only instance of men's being unhappily betrayed in an evil hour, by the power of a sudden and unexpected temptation. Too many instances may be produced, even of habitually good and virtuous persons being drawn aside, in some unguard- ed moment, and by the force of an unthought-of strong temptation, into the commission of those sins, which, in other circumstances, they would have trembled at, and ab- horred the very mention and thought of. The first crime thus committed, and the dreaded conse- quences of it appearing, the unhappy prince found himself involved in difficulties, out of which he knew not how to extricate himself. Conscious guilt, concern for his own character, regard for the honoiir of the fair partner of his crime, and even fear of his own, and her life ; the punishment of their adultery being death ; all united, to put him on form- ing some contrivances how to conceal and prevent the scan- dal of it from becoming public. Hence, all the little tricks and shifts he made use of to entice the injured husband to his wife's bed, and father the fruit of their adultery upon him. Who can help pitying a great, and I will venture to affirm, a hitherto virtuous prince, reduced to these wretched expedients, to prevent that public infamy, which he now ipprehended to be near him, and dreaded the falling under 1 But even these failed him. What must he do 1 Where can a man stop, when once he is entangled in the toils of vice, and hath presumptuously ventured into the paths of guilt 1 Bathsheba must be pres^ved at any rate. His own honour was at stake to prevent her destruction, and he saw but one 27 way to secure that end, wMch he thought himself obliged, at any hazard, to obtain. If Uriah lived, she must inevita- bly die. Uriah could have demanded the punishment, and seems to have been a soldier of that roughness of temper, and firmness of resolution, as that he would have prose- cuted his vengeance against her to the utmost. The law was express and peremptory. Which of the two must be the victim 1 Cruel dilemma ! It is at last determined thai the husband should be sacrificed, to save the wife, whom David's passion had made a criminal; and had he forsaken her in this dreadful situation, and left her to her punish- ment, he would not only have pronounced sentence of death against himself, but been censured, I am persuaded, by al- most every man, as a monster of perfidy, baseness, and ingratitude. But how was Uriah to be got rid of 1 Poison, assassination, or a false charge of treason, or seme secret way of destruction, were methods which the eastern princes were well acquainted with. David was above them all, and had a kind of generosity in his very crimes. The man he was to destroy was a brave soldier, and he causes him to fall in the bed of honour, gloriously fighting against the enemies of his king and country ; and if dying in the field of battle, by the sword of an enemy, and in a glorious action, be a more eligible and honourable death, than the being despatched by the stab of a stiletto, the tortures of poison, or as a criminal on a false accusation of treason ; the causing an innocent person to die in the former manner, though this hath its great aggravation, yet is not so base and villanous an action, as destroying him by any one of the latter methods; and had David had recourse to any of them to get rid of a worthy man, whom he had criminally reduced himself to an almost absolute necessity of de- spatching, the crime would have been of a more horrid die, and justly excited a higher indignation and abhorrence. And though I am far from mentioning these particulars to excuse David's conduct, or palliate his aggravated offences; yet the circumstances I have mentioned excite my compassion, carry in the nature of the thing some alleviation of his crimes, and should ever be remembered 10 soften the pen that is employed in describing them. Having thus, by accumulated guilt, taken off the man that he dreaded should live, David, after Bathsheba had gone through the usual time of mourning, took her to his palace, and made her his wife, to screen her from a prose- cution of adultery, to secure her against the penalty of death, and in some measure to repair the injury he had done her, by his criminal commerce with her, during her former husband's life ; which, as a plurality of wives was not forbidden by that constitution and polity he lived under, was the least compensation that he could make, and which he was obliged in honour and justice to make her. One would have thought, that after such a complication of ag- gravated crimes, David, upon a review of his conduct, should have been struck with remorse, voluntarily con- fessed his sins to God, and humbly entreated from him the mercy and forgiveness he so much needed. But nothing of this appears from the history. He rather seems, on the contrary, to have been insensible and callous, and to have enjoyed his new-acquired pleasures, without any uneasi- ness at the dreadful expense by which he purchased them. The siege of Rabbah went on successfully, he saw no appearing proofs of the divine displeasure that threatened him, the affairs of government employed much of his time and thoughts, he esteemed himself happy in the preserva- tion of Bathsheba, and at full liberty to gratify the ardent passion he had conceived for her; and probably might persuade himself, that as Uriah was a Hittite, the taking away his wife and life greatly lessened the elggravation of his sin ; or, that as king of Israel, he was above the laws, and that however criminal such actions might have been in others, yet that the royal prerogative and power mighf render them lawful in him, or at least so extenuate the evil of them, as that they would pass unobserved by God, who had solemnly promised him the establishment of the throne and kingdom m his person and family. But by whatever means he made himself easy, the his- tory informs us, that " the thing which David had done displeased the Lord," who resolved to show his abhor- rence of the crime, to execute on him a vengeance pro- portionable to the heinousness and guilt of it, and hereby to rouse his conscience, and bring him to those acknowl- edgments of his sin, as might prepare him for, and render 210 2 SAMUEL. Chap 11. him capable of that forgiveness, which, how much soever he needed it, he was greatly unworthy of. He was pleased to employ Nathan th^ prophet on this solemn occasion ; who, by an artfully composed fable, brought the king to pronounce his own condemnation, even without suspecting or intending it. Bathsheba had just been delivered of a son, the fruit of her adulterous commerce with David, and who was, in the strictness of the letter, conceived by his mother in sin, and shapen in iniquity, David appears to have been fond of the child, and, in the midst of his joy on this account, Nathan demands an audience, and ad- dresses him with the following complaint. There were two men, who lived in the same city, one of whom was rich, and the other poqr. The rich man had flocks and herds in great abundance ; but the poor man had not any thing, save only one little ewe-lamb, which he had brought, and nourished, so that it grew up together with him, and with his children. It did eat of his morsel, and drank of his cup, and lay in his bosom, and was to him as a daugh- ter. And there came a certain traveller to the rich man, and he begrudged to take of his own flock and his own herd, to entertain his guest, but took the poor man's lamb, and provided for the traveller that came to him. David was extremely incensed against the man, and said to Nathan : "As the Lord lives, the man who has done this is worthy of death, and he shall restore the lamb fourfold, inasmuch as he hath done this thing, and because he had no com- passion." " Then Nathan said to David : Thou art the man. Thus saith the Lord God of Israel : I have anointed thee to be king over Israel, and delivered thee from the hand of Saul. I gave thee also thy master's house, and the wives of thy master into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Is- rael and of Judah ; and if this be but a small matter, I have also added to thee this and the other thing, which thou well knowest. Why then hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord, to do this wickedness in his sight 1 Thou hast smote Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast slain him by the sword of the children of Ammon. Now therefore the sword shall never depart from thy house, because thou hast despised me, and hast taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be thy wife. Thus saith the Lord : Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and will take thy Avives before thine eyes, and will give them to thy neigh- bour, and he shall lie with thy wives before the sun. Though thou hast done this secretly, yet I will do what I have now said, before all Israel, and before the sun." This dreadful sentence roused the conscience of David, and from the fullest conviction of the heinousness of his of- fence, he immediately made this acknowledgment to Na- than: "I have sinned against the Lord." Upon this in- genuous confession, Nathan immediately replies: " The Lord also hath put away thy sin. Thou shalt not die. However, since by this deed thou hast caused the enemies ■A' the Lord contemptuously to reject him, the son also that is born unto thee shall surely die." When Nathan had thus boldly and faithfully executed his commission, he left the king, and the lecture which he read him was worthy the dignity of a prophet's character and station, and such as became the majesty of him to whom it was given. It was grave, strong, affecting, insinuating, nnd polite. The parable, in which he conveyed to him his message from God, is dressed up with all the circum- stances of art, tenderness, and delicacy, to move compas- sion, and, at the same time, to force from him that dread- ful sentence : " As the Lord liveth, the man that hath done this thing shall surely die, because he did this thing, and because he had no compassion ;" thus drawing from him the sentence of his own condemnation, even before he perceived it. But how home, howbold was the application, when Na- than said to the king : " Thou art the man .... Where- fore hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord to ('o evil in his sight'? Thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife." How dreadful also was the sentence pronounced against him by the order (if God ! Such as showed the height of his abhorrence ff the crime, and his displeasure and indignation against him that committed it. But how did the unhappy offender receive this bold and severe remonstrance 1 Why, no r.ooner was the application made, but he falls under con- vi-'ior., acknowledges his offence against God, and owns himself worthy of death ; and the psalms he penned on this occasion show the deep sense he had of the guilt hp had contracted, and will be a memorial of the sincerity of his repentance throughout all generations. But was not Da- vid's repentance all affectation and hypocrisy, and did he not bear the reproof, and humble himself, because he took care not to disagree with his best friends; or, in other words, to keep fair with the priests and Levitesl But it the priests and Levites were such kind of men, as some have represented them ; ready to support David in all his measures of iniquity, and when he projected any scheme, were never wanting in their assistance to him ; why should any one of them give him any trouble in this affair '? In what had he disobliged them, by killing a Hittite, and debauching his wife 1 Or why should they disagree with" him about a transaction that no way related to them 1 I should rather think, they should have eudeavoured to have made him compound with them for a round sum of money, or a good number of sheep and oxen for sacrifices, that they might have feasted themselves on the price of his for- giveness; especially, as we have been told, that this same prophet, " Nathan, was a great lover of this sort of food, and very angry when he was excluded from good cheer." But indeed the insinuation itself is wholly groundless ; and let any man read through the reproof that Nathan gave him, and the direct charge of murder and adultery that he urged to his face, and, I think, he cannot but be convinced, that David's acknowledgment, " I have sinned against the Lord," could proceed from nothingbut a real and deep sense of the greatness of his crime, and that he deserved to be cut of! by the hand of God for that aggravated transgression. What further effectually refutes this suggestion is, that his bear- ing with the reproof, and humbling himself under it, did not at all reconcile Nathan to him, who left him with a threat- ening dreadful in its nature, enough to make his ears tingle, and his heart tremble within him The only favourable thing Nathan said to him was : " Thou shalt not die ;" but, at the same time, tells him, that the murder he had been guilty of should be revenged by the sword's never departing from his house, and his adultery retaliated in the most exemplary and public manner, upon his own wives ; threatenings that were made him, before he owned his fault, and submitted himself; and therefore his submission could be with no view of reconciling himself to Nathan, because that prophet had already peremptorily pronounced his punishment, which David's after confession did not in the least mitigate or alter ; for the punishment threatened was inflicted to the full ; and the particular nature and circumstances of it were such, and the events on which it depended were so distant and various, as that no human wisdom and sagacity could foresee them, or secure their futurity ; and there- fore Nathan, who pronounced his doom, must have been im- mediately inspired by God, who foresaw and permitted the means, by which his threatenings should be punctually executed, and thus brought upon David all the evils that his prophet had foretold should certainly befall him. The nature of his repentance my reader will be the better enabled to judge of, if he carefully reads over the 51st psalm, which he certainly penned on this occasion.— Chandler. No one can read this psalm, but must see all the charac- ters of true repentance in the person who wrote it, and the marks of the deepest sorrow and humiliation for the sins of which he had been gaiilty. The heart appears in every line, and the bitter anguish of a wounded conscience discovers itself by the most natural and affecting symp- toms. How earnestly does he plead for mercy, and there- by acknowledge his own unworthiness ! How ingenuous are the confessions he makes of his offences, and ho^"' heavy was the load of that guilt that oppressed him ! Tne smart of it pierced through his very bones and marrow, and the torture he felt was as though they had been broken, and utterly crushed to pieces. He owns his sins were of too deep a die for sacrifices to expiate the guilt of, and thai he had nothing but a broken heart and contrite spirit to of- fer to that God, whom he had so grievously offended. How earnest are his prayers, that God would create in him a clean heart, and renew a right spirit within him ! How doth he dread the being deserted of God ! How earnestly deprecate the being deprived of his favour, the joy of his salvation, and the aids and comforts of his holy spirit ! L«t but this psalm be read without pifcjudice, an^ with a view only to collect the real sentiments expressed in it, and the Chap. 12. 2 SAMUEL. 211 dispusitioa of heart that appears throughout the whole of It ; and no man of candour, I am confident, will ever suspect that it was the dictate of hypocrisy, or could be ptjnned from any other motive, but a strong conviction of the heinousness of his offence, and the earnest desire of God's forgiveness, and being restrained from the commis- sion of the like transgressions for the future. And those who run not upon David's character, on account of his con- duct in the matter of Uriah, though they cannot too hearti- ly detest the sin, and must severely censure the offender ; yet surely may find some room in their hearts for compas- sion towards him, when they consider how he was surpri- sed into the first crime, and how the fear and dread of a discovery, and his concern for the life of the woman he had seduced, led him on, step by step, to further degrees of deceit and wickedness, till he completed his guilt by the destruction of a great and worthy man; especially when they see him prostrate before God, confessing his sin, and supplicating forgiveness; and even exempted by God himself from the punishment of death he had incurred, upon his ingenuously confessing, " I have sinned against the Lord ;" an evident proof that his repentance was sincere, as it secured him immediately forgiveness from God, whom he had offended. I shall conclude this article by the remarks which Mr. Bavle makes on it. " His amour with the wife of Uriah, and the orders he gave to destroy her husband, are two most enormous crimes. But he was so grieved for them, and expiated them by so admirable a repentance, that this is not the passage in his life, wherein he contributes the least to the mstruction and edification of the faithful. We therein learn the frailty of the saints, and it is a precept of vigilance. We therein learn in what manner we ought to lament lor our sins, and it is an excellent model." Let me add, that the wisdom and equity of the law of Moses evi- dently appears, in that it appointed no sacrifices to atone for such crimes, the pardoning of which would have been inconsistent with the peace and safety of civil society; such as those which David laments in this psalm, murder and adultery. Here the punishment prescribed by the law was death, and David had no other way of escaping it, but by the undeserved mercy of God. This God was pleased to extend to him, to show how acceptable the sinner's un- feigned repentance will be, whatever be the nature and ag- gravations of his offences; and if we learn from hence, what the scripture calls "the deceitfulness of sin," to be cautious of the first beginnings of it, and not to indulge those sensual appetites, which, when given way to, draw men insensibly into crimes, they would have once trembled at the thoughts of committing; we shall make the best and wisest improve- ment of this melancholy part of David's history, and be real gainers by his sins and sorrows. — Chandler, CHAPTER XII. Ver. 11. Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun. 12. For thou didst i^ secretly ; but I will do this thing before all Israel, and before the sun. The words, I will raise up, I will take, I will do, do not I denote any positive actions of God, as if he prompted wick- ed men to do the same things wherewith he threatens Da- vid, insomuch that, without such prompting, they would not have done them, but by it were necessitated to do them ; such a construction as this is injurious to the divine attri- butes, and makes God the author of evil: but the true meaning is, that God, at that time, saw the perverse dispo- I sition of one of his sons, and the crafty wiliness of one of 1 his counsellors, which, without his restraining them, would ! not fail to create David no small uneasiness ; and therefore, 1 because David had violated his law, and, to gratify his lust, had committed both adultery and murder, God would not : interpose, but suffered the tempers of these two wicked per- ' sons to follow their own course, and have their natural swing; whereupon the one, being ambitious of a crown, en- deavours to depose .his father, and the other, willing to make the breach irreparable, advised the most detested thing he could think of. This indeed was the very thing that God had foretold, but, without any imputation upon his attributes, we may say, that God can so dispose and guide a train of circumstances, that the wickedness of any action shall happen in this manner, rather than another, though he do not infuse into any man the will to do wick- edly. So that from such scripture phrases as these, we may not infer, that God either does, or can do evil, but only that he permits that evil to be done, which he foreknew would be done, but might have prevented, had he pleased ; or, in other terms, that he suffers men, naturally wicked, to follow the bent of their tempers, without any interposi- tion of his providence to restrain them, — Stackhouse. Ver. 16. David therefore besought God for the child ; and David fasted, and went in and lay all night upon the earth. 17. And the elders of his house arose, and went to him, to raise him up from the earth: but he would not, neither did he eat bread with them: 1 8. And it came to pass on the seventh day, that the child died. And the servants of David feared to tell him that the child was dead ; for they said, Behold, while the child was yet alive, we spake unto him, and he would not hearken unto our voice ; how will he then vex himself, if we tell him that the child is dead? 19. But when David saw that his servants whispered, David perceived that the child was dead : there- fore David said unto his servants, Is the child dead 1 And they said. He is dead. 20. Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the Lord, and worship- ped : then he came to his own house ; and, when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat. The account Sir John Chardin gives us of eastern mourning, in order to illustrate Ecclesiasticus xxxviii. 17, is as follows. " The practice of the East is to leave a rela- tion of the deceased person to weep and mourn, till, on the third or fourth day at farthest, the relations and friends go to see him, cause him to eat, lead him to a bath, and cause him to put on new vestments, he having before thrown him- self on the ground," &c. The surprise of David's servants then, who had seen his bitter anguish while the child was sick, arose apparently from this, that, when he found it was dead, he that so deeply lamented, arose of himself from the earth, without staying for his friends coming about him, and that presently; immediately bathed and anointed him- self, instead of appearing as a mourner; and, afler worship- ping God with solemnity, returned to his wonted repasts without any interposition of others ; which as now, so per- haps anciently, was made use of in the East. The extrem- ity of his sorrows for the child's illness, and his not observ- ing the common forms of grief afterward, was what sur- prised his servants. Every eye must see the genera ground of astonishment ; but this passage of Chardin gives great distinctness to our apprehensions of it.— Harmer. Ver. 20. Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the Lord and worshipped: then he came to his own house ; and, when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat. 21. Then said his servants unto him, What thing is this that thou hast done? thou didst fast and weep for the child while it was alive ; but when the child was dead, thou didst rise and eat bread. The oriental mourner was distinguished bjrthe slovenli- ness of his dress. He suffered the hair of his head, if not 212 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 12. cut or plucked off in the excess of his grief, to hang dishev- elled upon the shoulders; he neither trimmed his beard, nor washed his feet, even in the hottest weather ; he did not wash his shirt, nor any of the linen he wore. During the whole time of mourning, he refused to change his clothes. In this state of total negligence, it appears that David mourned for his infant son ; for after he learned from his attendants that the child was dead, the inspired historian observes, " Then David arose from the earth, and washed and anointed himself, and changed his apparel." — Paxton. Ver. 29. And David gathered all the people together, and went to Rabbah, and fought against it, and took it. 30. And he took their king's crown from off his head, (the weight whereof was a talent of gold with the precious stones,) and it was set on David's head : and he brought forth the spoil of the city in great abundance. 31. Ajid he brought forth the people that were therein, and put them under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brick-kiln : and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon. So David and all the people return- ed unto Jerusalem. Josephus tells us, that the men were put to death by ex- quisite torments. And this hath been the sentiment of many learned commentators. Supposing this interpreta- tion of the passage to be true, I cannot help observing, with Mr. Le Clerc, on the place, that if the punishments inflicted on this people were as severe as they are represented to be, they might be inflicted by way of reprisal. That learned commentator thinks that they were such as the Ammonites themselves used, and that when they were conquered by David, he used them in the same manner as they had treat- ed their Hebrew prisoners. It is very certain that the Ammonites used them with great severity. Nahash, the father probably of this Hanun, in the wantonness of his cruelty, would not admit the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead, under Saul's reign, to surrender themselves prisoners to him, but upon condition of their every one's consenting to have their right eye thrust out, that he might lay it as a reproach upon all Israel ; to which, consistently enough, Josephus adds, that he treated his Hebrew captives with great barbarity, by putting out their right eye, to prevent their being further serviceable in defence of their country ; because as the left eye was hid by the shield, they were rendered by the loss of the other incapable of all military duty. Besides, the Ammonites frequently used the He- brews with excessive cruelty, and are represented by the prophet, as ripping up their women with child, that they might enlarge their border, i. e. prevent the Hebrews from having any posterity ever after, to inhabit the cities that had been taken from them. Casaubon also, in his notes upon Suetonius's life of Caligula, who cruelly used to saw men asunder, produces other examples of the same atrocious punishment, and thinks it was common among the eastern people. And if these severities were now exercised upon the Ammonites in retaliation for former cruelties of the like nature, they certainly had no right to complain ; and it will greatly lessen the horror that may be conceived upon account of them, and, in some measure, justify David in using them. Retaliations of this kind have been prac- tised by the most civilized nations. Thus the Romans re- venged the death of the brave Regulus, by giving up the Carthaginian captives at Rome into the power of Marcia, the wife of Regulus, who caused them to be shut up, two and two, in great chests stuck with nails, there to suffer the same torments which her husband had endured at Carthage. If to this we add, that this execution, if made at all, which however is not so very certain as some are willing to be- lieve, it was made in revenge for an infamous outrage on majesty, the violation of the law of nations, the bringing two powerful armies to invade his dominions, the great number of his subjects that must have been lost in these two battles, while the injuries were fresh in his mind, the persons who offered them present to his view, the whole nation engaged in an unrighteous war in vindication of the insult, and some severe animadversion was in justice due to the authors and abetters of such repeated acts of violence a^d injustice. The character of an ambassador was held sacred and inviolable among all nations, and any injuries offered to them were thought deserving the most exempla- ry punishments. The Roman history affords us many re- markable instances of this nature. When the Tarentines had affironted the Roman ambassador, Posthumius, one ot them, whose robe a drunken Tarentine, in the wantonness of insolence, had defiled by urinating against it, said to the citizens, " It is not a little blood that must wash and purify this garment." And when the Romans were informed ot this outrage, they immediately declared war against ihem, took their ships from them, dismantled the city, first made them tributaries, and at last massacred great numbers ot the inhabitants, and sold thirty thousand, who escaped the carnage, for slaves to the best bidder. In like manner, when the Roman deputies were treated with insolent lan- guage only by the Achaians, though they offered no in- jury to their persons, yet the Romans revenged it by the total destruction of Corinth, putting all the men to the sword, selling the women and children for slaves, and burning the whole city to the ground. Let me add here also, that the greatest generals, who have been remarkable for their humanity and mildness of disposition^- have sometimes thought themselves obliged to use, in terrorem, great severity towards their prisoners. Fa- bius Maximus, desirous of softening and tamirg the fierce and turbulent dispositions of the people of Celtiberia, now Arragon, ■wfas forced to do violence to his nature, and act with an apparent cruelty, by cutting off the hands of all those M'ho had fled from the Roman garrisons to the enemy ; that, by being thus maimed, they might terrify others from revolting. So also Lucullus used the Thra- cians, destroying many of his prisoners, some by the sword, others by fire, and as to others, cutting off their hands, which the barbarians themselves looked on as an instance of great inhumanity, as hereby they were forced to outlive their very punishnients. Many more instances of the like nature maybe easily produced ; and let David's conduct, as a general, be considered with the same candour and equity, as we would consider that of a Roman or Grecian com- mander, and those executions, which he may have been supposed to have ordered on particular occasions and of- fenders, and that appear to have the character of great se- verity and cruelty, will be found capable of such an apolo- gy, as will greatly lessen the blame that hath been so liber- ally thrown on them, and no more be considered as indi- cations of a disposition naturally inhuman and barbarous. I think the punishment of crucifixion is one of the most horrid and shocking that can be inflicted, in which the hands and feet are pierced through, and the whole body is upon the stretch and rack, and the person crucified dies a lingering and exquisitely painful death ; a punishment this, equally cruel and inhuman, with David's supposed saws, and harrows, and brick-kilns. Now supposing that David, instead of those instruments of death, had crucified the Am- monites by thousands before the gates of Rabbah ; or sup- posing, that when he took the city, he had condemned all above seventeen years old to mines, or distributed them by thousands and ten thousands, into the provinces of his king- dom, to be leisurely, and in cool blood, thrown to the beasts, or forced to murder each other on theatres, for the enter- tainment of his blood-thirsty people ; would not Mr. Bayle and his followers have cried out : Bella, horrida bella ! and censured David's conduct herein as unworthy a saint, and a man after God's own heart. And yet this was what the gentle, the benevolent Titus, did to "the Jews, whom the Romans, by their cruelty and oppressions, forced to take up arms against them ; and who may be truly said to have fought for their liberties, of which they had been unjustly deprived. Yet, during the siege, he ordered them to be scourged and crucified before the walls of Jerusalem, by hundreds at a time, and in such large numbers, as that they wanted room to place the crosses, and crosses for the bodies of those they condemned to crucifixion. And not only this, which perhaps may be thought to admit of some apology, as done in the heat and fury of the siege, but when the siege was over, and all instances of cruelly should have ceased, he murdered them wantonly, and in "cool blood, for Chap. 12. 2 SAMUEL. 213 the diversion of the provinces. "When he was at Cesarea, he threw great numbers of them to the beasts, and made others of them cut each other's throats. He celebrated his brother's birthday by destroying above two thousand five hundred of them by the same methods, and with the ad- ditional cruelty of burning many of ihem alive ; and on his father's birthday he acted with the same barbarity to- wards a large number of his captives at Berytus. The whole of them amounted to 97,000 ; and yet, would one think it, Titus thought he was a man after God's own heart, or that he executed the divine pleasure and vengeance on the Jews; for when he viewed the city after his conquest, he publicly said : " We have carried on the war agreeable to God's will, or under his favour. It is God who pulled down the Jews from their fortresses, which were uncon- querable by human arms and engines." But we need' not these examples to justify David's con- duct; for the more carefully I consider the scripture ac- count of his treatment of the Ammonites, I am the more fully convinced that he did not execute these severities upon them, and that the sacred history, fairly interpreted, will warrant no such charge ; and I will now venture thus to render the original words, " He brought forth the inhab- itants of it, and put them to the saw, to iron-mines, and to iron-axes, and transported them to the brick-kilns," or ra- ther, to the brick frame and bed, to make and carry bricks. He reduced them to slavery, and put them to the most ser- vile employments of sawing, making iron harrows, or rather working in the mines, to the hewing of stones, and making and carrying of bricks. To these drudgeries, some to one, and some to another, he condemned them, or by these means brought them into entire subjection, and put it out of their power to give him any further disturbance. This interpretation is so far from being forced, as that it is entirely agreeable to the proper sense and meaning of the original words, and fully vindicates David from that inhu- manity, by which some have characterized the man after God's own heart. The bella, horrida bella, all here vanish in an instant. This account may also be confirmed by the parallel place in Chronicles, where the historian tells us, that David brought them forth, and, as I would render the words, divided or separated them to the saw, to the mines and axes; agreeable to what is said in Samuel, that he re- moved them from their former habitations to work in these servile employments. Or they may be rendered : " He made them to cut with the saw, the harr-ow, and the axe," i. c. condemned them to these slavish employments. Or final- ly, some interpreters give this version : " He ruled over them by the saw, the mine," &c. kept them in a state of subjec- tion, by putting them to these hard labours. It is'a further confirmation of the foregoing representa- tion, what the historian adds : " Thus did David unto all the cities of the children of Ammon." What did he do 1 What ! put them to death throughout all their cities, by those ex- quisite methods of cruelty? The thing is impossible, for then he would have totally extirpated them, and we should never have heard of them again, as a nation, in his- tory. And yet it is certain, that within a very few years after the taking of Raboah, this very city existed, and was inhabited, and had a tributary king or viceroy ; even Shobi, the son of Nahash, and therefore probably the brother of Hanun, who offered this violence to David's ambassadors. For while David was at Mahanaim,on the other side Jordan, waiting the event of Absalom's rebellion, this Shobi, among other of David's friends, brought him very large supplies of all sorts of necessaries, beds, basins, earthen vessels, wheat, barley, flower, parched corn, beans, lentile, parched pulse, honey, butter, sheep, and cheese, for himself and peo- ple; for they said, the people are hungry and weary, and thirsty in the wilderness. So that the city and country were both inhabited, and the lands cultivated, abounding with plenty of all necessaries ; and therefore there could be no general massacre, or very large destruction of the inhabitants, bv David. Nor is it at all probable, that had David made those cruel executions among the. Ammonites, which some ascribe to him, he would have found so much friendship from them in his distresses, while the barbar- ' ities he exercised on them were fresh in their memories; but rather, that they would have wished his destruction, and at least have waited the fortune of the war, that threat- ' encd David with entire ruin, and not have supplied him, , for fear of their incurring the displeasure of Absalom, who aimed at his life, that he might usurp his throne, and would not have failed, had he been victorious, to have exe- cuted a severe revenge on them, for the assistance they gave him ; especially as they might have urged a very plausible plea for their not assisting him ; the scarcity of the inhab- itants by the late executions, had that been really the case, and the impoverishment of their lands, for want of hands to cultivate them, and by the ravages committed on them, by David's army. Besides, we read of these Ammonites, and the inhab- itants of Seir, and the Moabites, all united, and bringing a very formidable army to invade the dominions of Jehosha- phat. And though this was many years after their being subdued by David, yet it is not to be wondered at, that we hear little of them during this interval, as they were kept in strict subjection, and curbed with garrisons by the succes- sors of David ; just as the Edomites, during the same pe- riod, who, together with the Moabites, endeavoured to shake off the yoke of the Hebrew kings, but were reduced by them to their former subjection. Now it is altogether in- credible, that if David had thus utterly extirpated the in- habitants of these countries, as some represent his conduct, they could, in one hundred and forty years afterward, under Jehoshaphat, have brought such a multitude of men against him, as forced him to acknowledge, in his prayer to God, that " he had no might against that great company that came against him, and that he knew not what to do ;" ev^en when he had above a million of men, mighty men of valour, ready prepared for the war. When therefore the history says," thus did David to all the cities of the chil- dren of Ammon," the meaning can only be, that he con- demned to slavery, not the v/hole nation, but such of the people, in their several towns and cities, as he had done to the inhabitants of Rabbah, who had been the advisers of the outrage, or principally concerned in that unrighteous- war, which they carried on against him in vindication of it. The rest lie permitted to dwell in their towns, and cultivate their possessions, and appointed over them Shobi, the brother of Hanun, king, as a tributary to his crown ; and I doubt not in graceful remembrance of the kindness he formerly received from Nahash, Shobi's father, which was also the real reason of the congratulatory message he sent to Hanun his eldest son, upon his accession to the throne. I would further observe, that as David certainly had a great deal of generosity and goodness in his natural temper, the sacred writers, who have, with great freedom and im- partiality, mentioned his faults, and who have transmitted to us this account of his treatment of the Ammonites, have passed no censure on him for having exceeded the bounds of humanity and justice, in the punishment he inflicted on them : and from hence we may, I apprehend, justly con- clude, either that it was not so severe, as it hath been gen- erally thought, or that there were some peculiar reasons wlfich demanded it, and which, if we were particularly acquainted with them, would, in a great measure, alleviate the appearing rigour of it; or that the law of nations, and the jus belli, then subsisting, admitted such kinds of execu- tions upon very extraordinary occasions; though I think there are scarce any that can fully justify them. But if the account which I have given of this affair be, as I think it is, the true one, the Ammonites were treated just as they deserved, and according to what was practised by the most civilized nations, and all exclamations against the man after God's own heart, will be unreasonable and unjust. Mr. Bayle, among others, grievously complains on this article, " Can this method," says he, " of making war be denied to be blameworthy 1 tiave not the Turks and Tartars a little more humanity'? If a vast number of pamphlets daily complain of the military executions of our own time, which are really cruel, and highly to be blamed, though m.ild in comparison of David's ; what would not the authors of those pamphlets say at this day, had they such usage to censure, as the saws, "the harrows, and brick-kilns, of David'?" It is a pity this learned and candid criti* should form his notion of the cruelly of some military ex- ecutions by a set of pamphleteers, a' sort of authors not al- ways of the best information and credit. But what if these same pamphlet writers, should complain of the cruelty of certain military executions, that had no foundation in fact, but only in their misinterpretation of some accounts of them, which they did not understand, or could not translate rightly from the language in w^hich they were written 1 8U 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 13. Jr «'hat if some person, assuming the character of a critic, should take upon trust his account, from these very respecta- ble pamphlet writers, of the cruelty of some military execu- tions, and censure the authors of them, as worse than Turks and Tartars, without ever searching himself the original re- laters of them, to know whether the account of the pamphlet- eers were genuine or not ; what censure would he not de- serve from the impartial woild, for propagating such false and groundless stories 1 I am confident Mr. Bayle never critically examined, in the original language, the account of these military executions by David, for if he had, he would certainly have found reason, at least to have sus- pended his judgment, if not entirely to have altered it. I should be in no pain for David's character, if I could as well defend him, in what the truth of history obliges me now to relate, as I think he may be justified in the treat- ment of the Ammonites. — Chandler. Ver. 31. And he brought forth the people that u-ere therein, and put them under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brick-kiln : and thus did he unto all the cities of the chil- dren of Ammon. It seems to have been the practice of eastern kmgs, to command their captives, taken in war, especially those that had, by the atrociousness of their crimes, or the stoutness of their resistance, greatly provoked Iheir indignation, to lie down on the ground, and then put to death a certain part of them, which they measured with a line, or deter- mined by lot. This custom was not perhaps commonly practised by the people of God, in their wars with the nations around them; one instance, however, is recorded in the life of David, who inflicted this punishment on the Moabites: " And he smote Moab, and measured them with a Ime, casting them down to the ground ; even with two lines measured he to put to death, and with one full line to keep alive ; and so the Moabites became David's servants, and brought gifts." The same warlike prince inflicted a still more terrible punishment on the inhabitants of Rabbah, the capital city of Ammon, whose ill-advised king had violated the law of nations, in oflfering one of the greatest possible indignities to his ambassadors : '* He brought out the people that were therein, and put them under ftaws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brick-kiln ; and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon." Some of them he sawed asunder; others he tore in pieces with harrows armed with great iron teeth ; or lacerated their bodies with sharp sickles or sharp stones ; or rather, he dragged them through the place where bricks were made, and grated their flesh upon the ragged sherds. This dreadful punish- ment was meant to operate upon the fears of other princes, and prevent them from violating the right of nations in the persons of their ambassadors. These were usually persons of great worth or eminent station, who, by their quality and deportment, i^iight command respect and attention from their very enemies. Ambassadors were accordingly held sacred among all people, even when at war; and what in- juries and affronts soever had been committed, heaven and earth were thought to be concerned to prosecute the injuries done to them, with the utmost vengeance. So deep is this impression engraved on the human n'i.nd, that the Lacedemonians, who had inhumanly murdered the Persian ambassadors, firmly believed their gods would accept none of their oblations and sacrifices, which were all found pol- luted with direful omens, till two noblemen of Sparta were sent as an expiatory sacrifice to Xerxes, to atone for the death of his ambassadors by their own. That emperor, indeed, gave them leave to return in safety, without any other ignominy than what they suffered by a severe reflec- tion on the Spartan nation, whose barbarous cruelty he pro- fessed he would not imitate, though he had been so greatly provoked. The divine vengeance, however, suffered them not to go unpunished, but inflicted what those men had as- sumed to themselves, on their sons, who being sent on an embassy into Asia, were betrayed into the hands of the Athenians, who put them to death: which Herodotus, who relates the story, considered as a just revenge from heaven, for the cruelty of the Lacedemonians. The char- acter of ambassadors has been invested with such inviolable sanctity, by the mutual hopes and fears of nations; for if persons of that character might be treated injuriously, the friendly relations between different states could not be maintained ; and all hopes of peace and reconciliation among enemies, must be banished for ever out of the world. But these considerations, although they might jus- tify David in demanding satisfaction, and inflicting condign punishment on the king of Rabbah, cannot be reckoned a sufficient excuse for such severities. They may therefore be considered as a proof, that he was then in the state of his impenitence, in consequence of his illicit connexion with Bathsheba, when the mild, and gentle, and humane spirit of the gospel in his bosom, had suffered a mournful decline, and he was become cruel and furious, as well as lustful and incontinent. The captives taken by Amaziah, in his war with Edom, were also treated with uncommon severity, for " he took ten thousand of thera alive, and brought them to the top of a rock, and cast them down, so that they were all broken in pieces." — Paxton. CHAPTER XIII. Ver. 6. So Amnon lay down, and made himself sick. The Asiatics are certainly the most expert creatures I have seen in feigning themselves sick. Thus, those who wish to get off work, or any duty, complain they have a pain here, and another there : they affect to pant for breath, roll their eyes, as if in agony; and, should you touch them, they shriek out, as if you were killing them. The sepoys, and those who are servants in the government offices, give great trouble to their superiors by ever and anon complain- ing they are sick; and it requires great discernment to find out whether they are so, or are merely affecting it. Their general object is either to attend a marriage, or some religious festival. — Roberts. Ver. 8. So Tamar went to her brother Amnon's house, and he was laid down. And she took flour, and kneaded it, and made cakes in his sight, and did bake the cakes. In the most considerable houses of Persia, they kin^c their fires, not under a chimney, as is usual with us in fire- places, but in a kind of oven, called tinnor, about two palms from the ground, formed of a vase of burnt clay, in which they place burning coals, charcoal, or other com- bustible matter. The -smoke from the coals is conveyed by means of a pipe from the oven under ground ; and by means of another, communicating with the grated bottom of the fire, it is supplied with air. Here they cook their meat, and can bake their cakes on a flat sheet of iron laid over the tinnor, in little more than an instant of time. When the oven is not thus used, they place a plank over it in the shape of a small table, which they cover entirely, spreading over it a large cloth which extends on all sides to the ground, over a part of the floor of the chamber. By this contrivance, the heat being prevented from diffusing itself all at once, it is communicated insensibly, and so pleasantly throughout the whole apartment, that it cannot be better compared than to the effect of a stove. Persons at their meals, or in conversation, and some even sleeping, lie on the carpets round this table, supporting themselves against the walls of the apartment on cushions kept for the purpose, which likewise serve for seats in this country, the tinnor being so placed as to be equally distant from the sides of the room. Thus circumstanced, those to whom the cold is not unpleasant, put their legs tinder the cloth : others, who feel it more sensibly, their hands and the rest of their body. By bringing their extremities thus towards the central fire, they receive thence a mild and renetraing warmth, which diffuses itself agreeably over their whole body, without any injury to the head. — Burder. Let it not appear strange that a king's daughter in the reign of David, was employed in this menial service ; for Dr. Russel says, the eastern ladies ot^en prepare cakes and other things in their own apartments ; and some few par- ticular dishes are cooked by themselves, but not in theif apartments ; on such occasions they go to some room near the kitchen. The eastern bread ii made in small, thin, Chap. 14. 2 SAMUEL. 215 moist cakes : it must be eaten new, and is unfit for use when kept longer than a day. Both Russel and Rauwolf, however, mention several kinds of bread and cakes ; some which aie done with yolks of eggs ; some which are mixed Aviih coriander and other seeds; and some which are strewed with them ; and Pitts describes a kind of biscuits, which the Mohammedan pilgrims carrj' from Egypt to Mecca, and back again, perfectly fresh and good. The holy scriptures accord with the narratives of modern trav- ellers, in representing the oriental loaves as very small, three of them being required for the repast of a single person : " Which of you shall have a friend, and shall go unto him at midnight, and say unto him, Friend, lend me ihreti loaves : for a friend of mine in his journey is come to me, and I have nothing to set before him V It appears also from the history of Abraham, and particularly from his entertaining the three angels, that they were generally eaten new, and baked as they were needed. Sometimes, however, they were made to keep several days ; for the shew-bread might be eaten after it had stood a week before the Lord. The pretence of the Gibeonites, that their bread had become mouldy from the length of the road, although it was taken fresh from the oven when they left home, proves, that bread for a journey was made to keep a con- siderable time. In every one of those minute circumstances, the sacred volume perfectly corresponds with the statements of modern travellers. — Paxton, Ver. 17. Then he called his servant that minister- ed unto him. Eastern masters do not keep their Servants at the distance usual in England. The affairs of the family, the news of the day, and the little incidents of life, are mutually dis- cussed", as by equals. The difference between them, in reference to property, is sometimes not great ; the master has, perhaps, his small family estate, or some business which produces a little profit, and the servant is content with his rice, and a scanty cloth for his loins. No native who can afford it is without his servant, and many who can scarcely procure food for themselves, talk very largely about their domestics. See my lord seated in his verandah, chewing his beetel, and cogitating his plans: hear him at every interval say to his attendant, " What think you of thati" " Shall I succeed 1" " You must assist me ; I know you have great sense : let this prosper, and you shall have rings for your ears, and a turban for your head. Good : Eour water on me." They go to the well, and the servant ales about a hogshead of water on his master's head. They go to the house, and then the command is, " Rub my joints and limbs." " Ah! bring my rice and curry." That finished, " Bring water to wash my mouth ; pour it on my hands: a shroot and fire bring; fetch my sandals, my turban, umbrella, and beetel-box. Let us depart." Then may be seen the master stepping out with a lordly air, and the domestic at his heels, giving advice, or listening to his master's tales. — Roberts. Ver. 19. And Tamar put ashes on her head, and rent her garment of divers colours that was on her, and laid her hand on her head, and went on crying". See on Mat. 11. 21. Ver. 21. And when King- David heard of all these things, he was very wroth. Mr. Bayle, who takes every occasion to depreciate the character of David, says that " his indulgence to his children exceeded all reasonable bounds, and that had he punished, I as the crime deserved, the infamous action of his son Amnon, he would not have had the shame and uneasiness, to see another person revenge the injury done to Tamar." I suppose he means, that he should have punished Amnon with death. But Amnon was David's eldest son, and heir : apparent to his throne and kingdom, and he might not think : it prudent, or that it would have been well taken by the na- tion, if he had put him to death without consulting them. And this would have been exposing, in the most public ' manner, the disgrace of his own family, which he thought it was best to conceal, as far as he was able. That David did not punish Amnon in some very exemplary manner, is more than Mr. Bayle could be sure of. There are some circumstances that make it very probable he did. The history assures us, that when David heard of the affair, he was very wroth. And it is very natural to suppose he made Amnon feel the effects of it. He seems to have put him under arrest and confinement, and allovved him to go no- where without his express leave. For when Absalom in- vited the king and all his servants to go to his sheepshear- ing feast, and the king denied him, he particularly pressed him to let Amnon go with him ; which shows, that, though all the other sons of David easily obtained leave to attend Absalom, yet that Amnon was under greater restraint than all the rest, otherwise there would have been no need for him particularly to have pressed David to grant Amnon leave to accompany him, or reason why David should wiih difficulty and reluctance grant it. This was two full years after Amnon 's affair with Tamar. So long a confinement as this to a king's eldest son, was itself a very severe pun- ishment, and probably attended with several circumstances, that rendered it peculiarly grievous. It is not however consistent with candour to accuse men of faults, which there is no real proof of, and especially when there are some intimations, that they never committed them ; or to aggravate them beyond the real demerit. One cannot help observing here, how David's adultery with Bathsheba was punished by his son's incest with his sister Tamar ; and as he now saw the threatenings of God by Nathan beginning to take place, he had too much reason to fear they should be all 01 them executed to the full. It was a circumstance also that must greatly affect him, that he had been, though unwillingly, a sort of accessary to Amnon 's crime, by yield- ing so readily to Amnon's desire, of having his sister sent to him ; the very proposal he made of her dressing and re- ceiving his food from her, seeming enough to create some suspicion in David, that he had some design upon Tamar, which he ought to have been peculiarly carenil to guard against. But probably Amnon had never offended him, nor given any occasion to suspect him capable of so heinous a crime, as he was now meditating, and therefore David more easily consented, that his sister should have the liberty of attending him, — Chandler. Ver. 39. And the soul of King- David long-ed to go forth unto Absalom : for he was comforted concerning Amnon, seeing he was dead. The Hebrew has, for Imiged, "was consumed." A person labouring under an intense desire for the possession of an object, says, " My soul is consumed for it," meaning that his spirit is wasting away by the intensity of his wishes. " My life is burning away through fear." *' My spirit is consuming for his safety."— Roberts, CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 2. And Joab sent to Tekoah, and fel\.hed thence a wise woman, and said unto her, I pray thee, feign thyself to be a mourner, and put on now mourning app^irel, and anoint not thyself with oil, but be as a woman that had a long time mourned for the dead. It is a curious fact, that the Hindoos do not put on what is called mourning at the death of their friends. The relations take off their ear-rings and other ornaments, and neglect the dressing of their hair. A woman, on the death of her husband, takes off the thali (equivalent to the mar- riage ring) fiom her neck ; and formerly she used to shave her head; but in all other respects she dresses as before. Those who are sick, as they suppose, under the influence of Saturn, generally wear something black, or have marks of that colour on their clothes, as they believe the indispo- sition is in this way removed. — Roberts. Ointments were in great esteem and constant use among the ancients, as the means of cleanliness, and to give a grateful odour to their bodies, as these ointments were mixed up with the richest perfumes. At their festivals, especially among the rich and prosperous, they used them for the refreshment of their guests, and to render the enter- tainment more acceptable and delightful. But as great affliction and distress naturally create negligence of person 216 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 14. and dress, they forbore anointing themselves at such sea- sons, as inconsistent with the condition of mourners. — Chandler. Ver. 7. And so they shall quench my coal which is left, and shall not leave to my husband neither name nor remainder upon the earth. So said the woman of Tekoah, who went with a fictitious story to David, in order to induce him to recall Absalom. She affected to be a widow, and said that one of her sons had killed the other, and that now the family demanded his life as an atonement for that of his brother ; and she said, that if they succeeded they would auENCH her coal. But the life is sometimes called the light, as in chap. xxi. 17, which in the margin is translated " candle, or lamp." Both the comparisons include the idea of fire. Formerly, and even now, it is not uncommon for travellers to have to purchase their fire before they can cook their victuals. Hence it is common, when neighbours ask for a light in the morning, to be answered, by way of pleasantry, " You want fire — well, where is your money ?' Children in Ceylon are not called coals, but sparks. It is said of a man who has a large family, " He has plenty of porrekal, i. e. sparks." Those who are favoured with fme children, are said to have large sparks. Of those whose children are all dead, " Alas ! their sparks are all quenched." To a person who is injuring an only child, it is said, " Ah ! leave him alone, he is the only spark." — Roberts. Ver. 17. Then thy handmaid said, The word of my lord the king shall now be comfortable : for as an angel of God, so is my lord the king, to discern good and bad ; therefore the Lord thy God will be with thee. Thus did the woman of Tekoah compliment David, and thus did Mephibosheth address him, when he had been slandered by Ziba. Great men are often compared to the messengers (the true meaning of angel) of the gods. Thus men of great wisdom or eloquence are said to be like the angels of the gods. " Ah ! my lord, you know all things : you are one of the angels of the gods." Sometimes the person will not address you in a direct way, but speak as ' to a third person, loud enough for you to hear. "Ah! what wisdom he has ; there is nothing concealed from him. Whence has he had his wisdom % from the gods — Yes, yes, all things are known to him." Then turning to you, they look humbly in your face, and say, " My lord, there are only two for me : God is the first ; but you are the second." — Roberts. The compliments which they addressed to their princes, and the manner in which they spoke of them, were not less hyperbolical. The address of the wise woman of Te- koah to David, furnishes a memorable example of the ex- travagant adulation in which they indulged, and which seems to have been received with entire satisfaction by one of the wisest and holiest of men: "As an angel of God, so is my lord the king, to discern good and bad;" and again, " My lord is wise according to the wisdom of an angel of God, to know all things that are in the earth." Equally hyperbolical was the reply of a Persian grandee to Chardin, who objected to the price which the king had set upon a pretty rich trinket : " Knew that the kings of Persia have a general and full knowledge of matters, as sure as it is extensive ; and that equally in the greatest and in the smallest things, there is nothing more just and sure than what they pronounce." This incident admirably shows the strong prepossession of these Asiatics in favour of their kings, or rather of their own slavery; and gives some plausibility to the remark of Mr. Harmer, that theje may be more of real persuasion in such addresses than we are ready to apprehend. In the estimation of the Persian L-ourlier, the knowledge of his prince was like that of an angel of God. If the ancient Egyptians supposed their princes were possessed of equal knowledge and sagacity, which is not improbable, the compliment of Judah to his brother Joseph was a very high one, and, at the same time, couched in the most artful terms: "Thou art even as Pharaoh;" knowing, and wise, and equitable as he. But it cannot be inferred, with any degree of certainty, from these customs, that either the Persian grandee, or the brother of Joseph, really believed such compliments were due. The former, most probably, thought it incum- bent upon him to support the dignity of his master, espe- cially in the presence of many of his nobles, or expressed himself in such extravagant terms, merely in compliance with the etiquette of the court ; and as for Judah, it was his desire to sooth with good words and fair speeches the second ruler in Egypt, whose resentment he knew it was death to incur; and no compliment could be supposed more acceptable to an Egyptian grandee, than the one which he paid to his unknown brother. The same remark • applies, with little variation, to the woman of Tekoah; her design was to sooth the mind of her sovereign, to mitigate, and, if possibly, td extinguish his just resentuTent of the atrocious murder which Absalom had committed, and procure the restoration of the fratricide to his country, and the presence of his father. — Paxton. Ver. 24. And the king said. Let him turn to his own house, and let him not see my face. So Absalom returned to his own house, and saw not the king's face. Few things are more oflfensive in the East than to re- fuse to show yourself to those who come to see you. Send your servant to say you are engaged, or that the individual may go, and he will be distressed, or enraged, and not hesitate to express his feelings. Should there, however, be any reason to hope, he will wait for hours at your door, nay, he will come day after day, till he shall have seen your face. They have an opinion, that if they once gain admission into your presence, a great point is attained, and so it is ; for, what with their eloquence, and teats, and abject submissions, they seldom fail to make an impres- sion. Even low people, who have no particular business, often call upon you that they may be able to say that they have seen vour face. When a person says he has not seen the face of the great man, it means, Ihathe has not gained his suit. See the high caste native passing along the road ;< an humble suppliant is there to attract his attention : and let him turn his face another way, and it is a dagger through the poor man's soul. — Roberts. Ver. 26. And when he polled his head, (for it wns at every year's end that he polled it ; because the hair was heavy on him, therefore he polled it:) he weighed the hair of his head at two hundred shekels after the king's weight. See on 1 Pet. 3. 3. The eastern ladies are remarkable for the length, and the great number of the tresses of their hair : the men there, on the contrary, wear very little hair on their heads now, but they do not seem always to have done so. That the eastern women now are remarkable fbr the quantity of the hair of their heads, and their pride in adorning it, ap- pears from the quotation from Dr. Shaw under a preceding observation. Lady Mary Wortley Montague abundantly confirms it : their " hair hangs at fulllength behind," she tells us, " divided into tresses, braided with pearl or riband, which is also in great quantity. I never saw in my life so many fine heads of hair. In one lady^ I have counted a hundred and ten of these tresses, all natural ; but it must be owned that every kind of beauty is more common here than with us." The men there, on the contrary, shave all the hair off" their heads, excepting one lock ; and those that wear their hair are thought eifeminate. I have met with both these particulars in Sir J. Chardin. As to the last, he says in his note on 1 Cor. xi. 14, that what the Apostle mentions there is the custom of the East : the raep are shaved, the women nourish their hair with great fond- ness, which they lengthen by tresses and tufts of silk, down to the heels. The young men who wear their hair, in the East, are looked upon as effeminate and infamous. It appears from this passage of the Corinthians, that in the days of St. Paul, the women wore their hair long, the men short, and that the Apostle thought this a natural dis- tinction. It does not however appear it was always thought so, or, at least, that the wearing longhair by the men was thought infamous, since it was esteemed a beauty in Absa- Chap. 15. 2 SAMUEL. 217 lom, 2 Sam. xiv. 26. That passage is curiouS; and requires some consideration, as being attended with some diliicul- ties; and, lam afraid, somewhat improperly explained. The weight of the hair, which seems to be enormously- great, is the first thing that occurs to the mind. Two hun- dred shekels, at two hundred and ninety grains each, make forty-three thousand and eight hundred grains. This is rather more than one hundred ounces avoirdupois, for four himdred and thirty-seven grains and a half are equal to yuch an ounce. It is a very good English head of hair, I am told, that weighs five ounces; if Absalom's then weighed one hundred ounces, it was very extraordinary. Some veryjearned men, I think, have believed a royal shekel was but half the w^eight of the sacred shekel ; be it so ; yet fifty ounces, ten times the weight of a good British head of hair, seems to be too great an allowance. To suppose, as some have done, that adventitious matters, united with the hair, are to be taken in to make up the weight, seems to me not a little idle : what proof would this have been of his possessing an extraordinary fine head of hair, since it would be possible to attach to the hair of a man half bald, substances that should weigh one hundred ounces '? Commentators then should by no means talk of the oil, the fragrant substances, the gold dust, with which they suppose the hair might be powdered, as making up this weight ; they might as well have added ornaments of gold, ribands, or what answered them, artificial tresses of hair, and all the matters that are now in different methods fastened to the hair : but would not this have been ridicu- lous '? It is more reasonable to say, the present reading may be faulty, as in other cases there have frequently been mistakes in numbers; or that we were not sure what num- ber of grains two hundred shekels, after the king's weight, was equal to ; than to attempt to remove the difficulty by such an incompetent method, it was an uncommonly fine head of hair, of very unusual weight, which is all that we know with certainty about it. The shaving off all this hair, for so the original word signifies, is a second thing that seems very strange. It was this thought, I should imagine, that led our translators to" render the word by the English term polled, or cut short : for it seems very unaccountable, that a prince who prided himself so much in the quantity of his hair, should annually shave it off" quite close ; and for what purpose 1 would not the shortening of it have relieved him from its excessive weight 1 not to say, that the hair of one year's growth can, in the common course of things, be of no great length, or weigh very much. The word elsewhere signifies to shave off all the hair ; is opposed to polling, or trimming the hair a little by shortening it; and was necessary in order to gain the knowledge of the true weight of the hair. Mourners shaved themselves. Job i. 20 ; and those that had been in a state of bitterness when they presented themselves before kings, as appears from what is related of Joseph, Gen. xli. 14; if then "from the end of days," which is the origi- nal expression, may be understood to mean at the end of the time of his returning to his own house, and not seeing i the king's face, instead of at the end of the year, then the , shaving himself may be thought to express one single i action, and to describe, in part, the manner in which he presented himself before the king. This would make the prophetic account very natural. Butthenthe word 133 kaied, translated heavy, must be understood in another sense, a sense in which it is»ometimes used, if we have no regard to the Masoretic points, namely, as signifying in glory, or honour, or something of that sort. And so the general meaning of the passage will be^ "And when he shaved his head, and it was in the end of the days, of the days of his disgrace, that is, at the time in which he was to shave, . because it was a glory upon him, and he shaved himself and weighed the hair of his head, two hundred shekels iafter the king's weight." But does not St. Paul suppose, that nature teaches us, that if a man have long hair, it is shame unto him, 1 Cor. xi. 14 1 He certainly does ; Ab- salom's hair however is evidently spoken of in the book of •Samuel, as what was thought to be part of his beauty, 2 Sam. xiv. 25 : whether it was that they had different notions 3n this point in the age of David ; or that they thought it "ather effeminate, but however a beauty. — Harmer. CHAPTER XV. Ver. 13. And there came a messenger to David, saying, The hearts of the men of Israel are after Absalom. 14. And David said unto all his ser vants that werewith him at Jerusalem, Arise, and let us flee ; for we shall not else escape from Absalom : make speed to depart, lest he over- take us suddenly, and bring evil upon us, and smite the city with the edge of the sword. One cannot help being surprised, at first view, how so excellent a prince as David was, who had exalted the king- dom of Israel to so high a degree of glory and power, who had subdued and rendered tributary all the neighbouring nations, which had so often oppressed them, who had made the best and wisest regulations for the honourable perform- ance of the solemnities of their public worship, who, in the whole course of his reign, had administered justice and judgment to all his people, and who certainly deserved to be loved and esteemed by all ranks and degrees of them, for the happiness they enjoyed under his government ; I say, one cannot help wondering at the sudden revolution that was brought about in favour of an ungrateful and per- fidious son, who was well known to have stained his hands with the blood of his elder brother. But there were many things that concurred to bring it about. By the death of Amnon he became heir-apparent to the crown, and being suspicious that the king his father might exclude him from the succession, upon the account of his character and crimes, he resolved to stick at no measures to obtain his ambitious views, and put it out of his father's power to set him aside. To accomplish thiSj being the handsomest man in Israel, he showed himself everywhere in public, to captivate with his person all that beheld him. He then set up a princely equipage to attract their admiration of his splendour and magnificence. He treated all that approached him with great condescension and affability ; and as any were ap- proaching the city from the other tribes of Israel, to have their causes heard before the king, he, in the most friendly manner, inquired of them, of what tribe they were, and hoped their cause was good ; but reproached his father with remissness of government, and neglect of his people ; telling them, that how just soever their cause was, they could have no audience, and that there was no man depu- ted of the king to hear them ; wishing, for their sakes, that he was con.stituted a judge in the land, that every man, who had any suit or cause, might come to him, and have imme- diate justice done him; and thus persuaded them to return home, without making any application for a hearing, dis- contented with the king's government, and highly pleased with Absalom's condescension and goodness; greatly dis- posed to spread disaffection and sedition in the places to which they respectively belonged. And in order to secure the popularity he courted, whoever approached him to pay their respects to him, as the king's son, he familiarly took by the hand and embraced him. By these means he w^on the af- fections of great numbers among all the tribes ; who, though probably at first they had no design of deposing the king, and advancing Absalom in his room, wished to see hijin intrust- ed with the principal administration of affairs under his father, and were willing to enter into any measures wdth him to obtain it, and to prevent his exclusion from the throne after his father. Besides this, he sent emissaries throughout all the tribes to strengthen his interest, and to secure a good body of men to join him, whenever his affairs required their assistance. Absalom did not at first open his intentions of dethroning his father, but wished onl5ito be a judge in the land ; fol- low :ing herein the crafty counsel of Ahithophel, who was David's chief counsellor, and treated by him as his intimate friend, and who having been admitted to his secrets, proba- bly informed Absalom of his father's design to exclude him from the succession, in favour of one of his younger breth- ren ; advising him, what steps he should take in order to prevent it. His appearance to countenance the rebellion allured many to become partners in it, as he was esteemed the ablest politician in the kingdom. What added further strength to it was, Amasa, David's own nephew, joined the conspiracy, and putting himself at the head of the rebel army, who, by his relation to the king, was a man of great consequence, and an able soldier, and who therefore would be thought by many incapable of entering into a conspiracy against his uncle to dethrone him, without some very great 218 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 15. and justifiable causes. It may be added, that Absalom's carrymg otf with him two hundred of the principal citizens of Jerusalem, and retaining them with his followers at lEebron, where the standard of the rebellion was first set up, added to the credit of the cause, and drew in many to abet and support it, who could not know but they engaged voluntarily in Absalom's party, and were not drawn in to espouse his interest by subtlety and force. Nor must it be forgot here, that the providence of God permitted the con- spiracy to go on without discovery, and to arise to that height, as to drive David from his throne, and thus bring on him the punishments he had threatened him with by Nathan the prophet, for his sin in the matter of Bathsheba and Uriah. All these circumstances together considered, It is no wonder that Absalom should draw together a num- ber of men sufficient to oppose and oppress his father, who suspected nothing of the conspiracy formed against him, and who appears to have had no part of his army with him, but some of his officers and ordinary guards, and which therefore made him take the resolution of retiring from Jerusalem, to prevent his being surprised by a superior force, that he knew himself unable to lesist. But then it should be considered, that this sudden insurrection was not the effect of a genera! or national disaffection to his person and government. This is evident from many hints in the sa- cred history. The best part of the inhabitants of Jerusalem were firmly attached to him, and followed him in his retreat from the capital, and all the country through which he went, showed their affection to him by loud acclamations. The Cherethites and Pelethites, the Gittites, and the ablest of his officers, continued steadfast in their attachment to him, and followed his fortune. The tribes on the other side Jordan gladly received him, and the richest persons of that coun- try supplied him and his forces with all necessary provi- sions, and he soon collected among them an army suffi- cient to check the rebels, and at one blow to crush the lebellion. And this was no sooner known, than the tribes in general were all in motion to show their loyalty to the king, and restore him to his throne and government. The truth is, that David was surprised unawares and unprovi- ded, by a wicked and impious faction, who had, by their emissaries, drawn together a large body of men, wherever they could pick them up, among all the tribes ; gaining over, probably, some well-minded persons, by lies, and slan- derous reports of the king's government, and such others, as, in all nations, are always ready to enter into any measures of wickedness and violence, in hopes of making their advantage by the public confusion and calamity, by those methods which are constantly practised by profligate conspirators, in order to gratify their pride, ambition, and revenge, though at the expense of the religion, liberties, and prosperity of their country. And it is therefore no won- der, that this rebellion, which was evidently contrary to the general sense and inclination of the people, was so suddenly suppressed, and David's restoration to his throne and gov- ernment was immediately resolved on by the unanimous consent of all the tribes of Israel ; whereby God was gra- ciously pleased to put an end to his troubles, bringing him in safety ifo his capital and palace, and preserving his life, till he happily settled the succession on Solomon his son, the wisest of princes, and the most prosperous raona,rch in the world.— Chandler. Ver. 30. And David went up by the ascent of mount Olivet, and wept as he went up, and had his head covered, and he went barefoot. Thus did David conduct himself in his sorrow, when Absalom had rebelled against him. But the Hindoos do not cover the head ; they take a part of their robe and cover the face. In going to a funeral, the turban is gener- ally taken off, and a part of the garment is held over the face. Nor is this merely common at funerals, for on all occasions of deep sorrow they observe the same thing. At such times, also, they always go " barefoot." — Roberts. This was an indication of great distress : for in ancient times the shoes of great and wealthy persons were made of very rich materials, and ornamented with jewels, gold, and pilver. When any great cniamity befell them, either pub- lic or private, they not only stripped thenaselves of tnese ornaments, but of their very shoes, and walked barefoot. In this manner, prisoners taken in war w-ere forced to walk, both for punishment and disgrace. — Burder. Ver. 32. And it came to pass, that when David was come to the top of the mount, where he worshipped God, behold, Hushai the Archite came to meet him with his coat rent, and earth upon his head: 33. Unto whom David said. If thou passest on with me, then thou shalt be a burden unto me : 34. But if thou return to the city, and say unto Absalom, I will be thy servant, O king; as I have been thy father's servant hitherto, so toill 1 now also he thy ser- vant : then mayest thou for me defeat the coun- sel of Ahithophel. Mr. Bayle calls this " the most treacherous piece of villa- ny that can be imagined." But he might have spared the reflection, for he could easily have produced instances of much greater villany than this, practised for the most crim- inal and execrable purposes. Hushai's treachery w^as to prevent the effects of the most detestable treachery, and an instance of loyalty and fidelity to his king and country. His villany was the dictate of public spirit and patriotism, and to counteract the plots of a most desperate and bloody villain, who advised the murder of a father, and incest with his wdves, in support of an unnatural, ambiiious, and desperate son. How far these policies of princes and great men, are reconcileable with the rules of those rigid casuists of which Mr. Bayle speaks, I pretend not to determine. This I know, that without these and the like stratagems, government cannot be frequently supported, and that the most nefarious attempts te destroy all that is valuable to mankind can never be defeated; and that they have been practised by the best and wisest of princes, who have been so far from being blamed on account of them, as that they have been recorded as the proofs of their wisdom, and re- • gard to the honour and interest of their country. And this Mr. Bayle himself confesses, when he says, that "strata^ gems of this nature are undoubtedly very laudable, if we judge of things according to human prudence, and the pol- itics of sovereigns." If David therefore acted in this af- fair, according to the rules of human prudence, and the constant policy of sovereigns, why should he be censured n;iore than other great and excellent princes, who have act- ed like him 1 Especially as he had none of those rigid casuists about him, who judged this conduct unworthy a saint, and an honest man. Supposing this conduct not quite reconcileable with the rules of rigid casuistry, yet, if David was not acquainted with them, he might possibly be a saint and an honest man, if he did not regard them. If Hushai had stabbed Absalom to the heart, under pretence of friend- ship, as Brutus did Caesar, must not those who defend Bru- tus, defend Hushai tool But is it a more base and crimi- nal part, by pretences of friendship, to betray a tyrant's, a usurper's, a parricide's counsels, than, in like circumstances, to assassinate himl I leave David's censurers fairly to state this important point of casuistiy : Whether it be in it- self absolutely unlawful to make use of stratagems, i. e. arts of deception, in the management of wars between princes and states: If not, in what instances they are law- ful, and reconcileable with the rigid yles of morality and virtue. "When these points are settled, we shall be the bel- ter able to determine concerning the morality and honesty of David and his friend Hushai in the instance before us; and, till this is done, Mr. Basic's charges will appear to be uncandid and groundless. I have only to add, that David's character, as a man after God's own heart, in the scripture sense of it, by no means implies, that, as a prince, he should always act according to the rules of morality laid down by rigid casuists; or, that he should not, in the management of his wars, and defeating unnatural rebellions, act with the U5ual policy of wise and good princes, and make use of proper stratagems, when necessary to the defence of his countrv, and the safety of his person. In Cicero's consulate, the conspiracy of Catiline broke rut, and it was fully discovered by that great consul's vigi- lance, prudence, and policy. Ambassadors from the AUo- broges, the ancient lahabitants of Savoy and Piedmont^ were then at Ronx » solicit the senate for the removal ot , Chap. 16, 2 SAMUEL. aio their grievances. Umbrenius, one of he conspirators, at- tempted to bring ov^er these ambaisado s, to engage in the scheme that had been concerted for the destruction of Rome. In order to this he opened to them the nature of the conspiracy, named the principal persons concerned in it, and promised them every thing they desired, if they would engage their nation to join with them in support of it. The ambassadors, upon considering the affair, discov- ered the whole conspiracy to Fabius Sanga, as they had bjiin informed of it by Umbrenius. Sanga immediately acquaints the consul with it, and introduced the ambassa- dors themselves to him. What doth he do 1 Why, like a very wicked and ungodly man, as the s-crupulous and righteous Mr. Bayle to be sure thought him, bid them car- ry on the pretence, warmly favouring the conspiracy, go to as many of the conspirators as they could, make them fair promises, and use all their endeavours fully to discover them. The ambassadors, as Cicero ordered, met them, and demanded from the chief of them an oath, to be signed wiih their own hand, that their countrymen might be more easily induced, to give them that assistance which they de- sired of them. They all but one, without suspicion of any design, signed the oath. The ambass9,dors discovered all to Cicero, who immediately seized the principal conspira- tors, and greatly rejoiced, that as the conspiracy was dis- covered, the city was delivered from the danger that im- mediately threatened it. The senate thought that Cicero had acted a noble patriotic part, for they immediately de- creed, that public thanks should be given to him in the most solemn manner, by whose virtue, counsel, and provi- dence, the republic was delivered from the extremest dan- gers; and that a public thanksgiving should be rendered to the gods, in Cicero's name, for. his having delivered the city from being laid in ashes, the citizens from a massacre, and Italy from a war. Now did Cicero act in this affair as a patriot and an honest man 1 Or did he, by this policy, damn himself, and damn the ambassadors'? by causing ihem to feign, that they embraced the party of those men, they designed effectually to destroy 1 What censure would he not have undergone, had he suffered the conspiracy to lake place, and his country to be ruined, by refusing to make use of that policy which was necessary to discover and defeat the conspiracy 1 Cf two evils, it is an old max- im, a man must choose the least, when he is under the ne- cessity of submitting to one. Thus were David and Cicero circumstanced. They both chose the patriotic part; and, as Cicero is justly celebrated as the Father and Saviour of his country, from the ruin that was intended, David w^ill deserve the like commendation, for defeating, by like meas- ures, the projects of impious conspirators, and delivering the nation from the destruction that threatened them, — Chandler. CHAPTER XVI. Ver. 1 . And when David was a little past the top of the hill, behold, Ziba the servant of Mephi- ■: bosheth met him, with a couple of asses sad- • died, and upon them two hundred loaves of bread, and a hundred bunches of raisins, and a hundred of summer fruits, and a bottle of wine. • See on 2 Kings 4. 8. Ziba met David, according to the sacred historian, 2 Sam. ' xvi. 1, with a couple of asses, and upon them two hundred ; loaves of bread, a hundred bunches of raisins, a hundred ; of summer fruits, and a bottle of wine. These summer \ fruits the Septuagint supposes were dates, but the more common opinion is that they were figs, which it seems was ■ that also of the Chaldee paraphrast. Grotius, however, ; supposes the original word signifies the fruits of trees in ; general. I cannot adopt any of these opinions. If the ; notes of distinction are not numerous enough, or sufficiently ; clear, to determine with precision what the fruit was, I ' believe thev are sufficient to satisfv us that these authors ; were mistaken. We may gather three things relating to them: that ihty were of some considerable size, since their • quantity was estimated by tale; that they came before the ■ bean season was ended, for after this we find that the inhab- ■ vtants of the country beyond Jordan sent to David, along I with other provisions, quantities of beans, 2 Sam. xviii. 28, I they being things, according to Dr. Shaw, that, after they are boiled and stewed with oil and garlic, constitute the principal food, in the spring, of persons of all distinctions; and they were thought by Ziba a suitable refreshment to those that were travelling in a wilderness, where it was to be supposed they would be thirsty as well as hungry. Nothing then could be more unhappy, or more strongly mark out the inattention of the translators of the Septuagint for it cannot be imagined they were ignorant of these maC ters, than the rendering this word, in this place, dates, which are neither produced in summer, nor suited to allay the heat of that season : Dr. Pococke observing that they are not ripe till November ; and that they are esteemed of a hot nature. Providence seeming to have designed them, as they are warm food, to comfort the stomach, he thinks, during the cold season, in a country where it has not given wine, for he is there speaking concerning Egypt. Wher then I find that watermelons grow spontaneously in thes<, hot countries, are made use of by the Arabs of the Holy Land in summer instead of water, to quench their thirst, and are purchased as of the greatest use to travellers in thirsty deserts ; and that cucumbers are very much used still in that country to mitigate the heat : I am very much inclined to believe these summer fruits were not the pro- duce of trees, but of this class of herbs, which creep along the ground, and produce fruits of a coolmg moisture, and very large in proportion to the size of the plant. They could scarcely however be watermelons, I imagine, because they do not begin to gather them before June ; but cucum- bers, which come in May, and were actually eaten in Gali- lee the latter end of that month by Dr. Pococke, he having stopped at an Arab tent, where they prepared him eggs and sour milk, he tells us, cutting into it raw cucumbers as a cooling diet in that season, which he found very hot ■. cucumbers continued at Aleppo to the end of July, and are brought again to market in September and October, and consequently are contemporaries with grapes and olives, according to Jer. xl. 10—12, as well as with beans and lentils. Dr. Russel also tells us fhat the squash comes in towards the end of September, and continues all the year; but that the orange-shaped pumpion is more common in the summer months. Of one or other of these kinds of fruit, I should think the writer of 2 Sam. designed to be under- stood : they are all more or less of considerable size ; they are contemporary with beans; and fit for them that have to travel through a dry wilderness, in the latter part of the spring, when the weather grows hot, as Pococke found it, about which time, from the circumstance of the beans and the lentils, it is plain that David fled from Absalom. If this be allowed, it will appear that they were called summer fruits, from their being eaten to allay the summer heals ; not frona their being dried in the summer, as Vatablus strangely imagines; nor from their being produced only that time of the year; for this passage shows that they were come to maturity before beans went out, and conse- quently before summer. — Harmer. Ver. 3. And the kinof said. And where is thj master's son ? And Ziba said unto the king behold he abideth at Jerusalem: for he said, to-day shall the house of Israel restore me the kingdom of my father. 4. Then said the king to Ziba, Behold, thine are all that pertained unto Mephibosheth. And Ziba said, I humbly beseech thee that I may find grace in thy sight, my lord, O king. Not the least material exception that objectors make to David's conduct, in this period of time, is his making i grant of Mephibosheth's estate to a perfidious servant without ever giving the master a fair hearing. But, how could David have leisure to send for Mephibosheth from mount Olivet to Jerusalem, and inquire into the merits of the cause depending between him and his servant, when he was in so great a hurry, and under flight from the arms of his rebel son'? Or how could he suppose that Ziba could have dared to have told him so notorious a lie, when it might in a short time be disproved 1 Every circumstance, in short, on Ziba's side, looked well, but none on his mas- ter's. To his master, David had been extremely kind, m restoring him to the forfeited estate of his grandfather Saul,. 220 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 16 and in allowing him to eat at his own table, as one of the .king's sons; and now, at the general rendezvous of his friends, David might well have expected that the person to whom he had extended so many favours, should not have been so negligent of his duty, as to absent himself, unless it had been upon some extraordinary business ; and therefore, when Ziba acquaints him with the occasion of his absence, though it was a mere fiction, yet with David it might find a readier credence, because, at this time, he had reason to mistrust everybody ; and seeing his own family discon- certed and broken, might think the crown liable to fall to any new claimant that could pretend to the same right of succession that Mephibosheth might. On the contrary, every thing appeared bright and plausible on Ziba's side. He, though but a servant, came to join the king, and in- stead of adhering to his master's pretended schemes of advancement, had expressed his duty to his rightful sov- ereign, in bringing him a considerable present, enough to engage his good opinion. The story that he told of his master likewise, though utterly false, was cunningly con- trived, and fitly accommodated to the nature of the times ; so that, in this situation of affairs, as wise a man as David might have been induced to believe the whole to be true, and upon the presumption of its being so, might have pro- ceeded to pass a judgment of forfeiture (as in most eastern countries every crime against the state was always attend- ed with such a forfeiture) upon Mephibosheth 's estate, and to consign the possession of it to another. All that David can therefore be blamed for, in this whole transaction, is an error in judgment, even when he was imposed upon by the plausible tale of a sycophant, and had no opportunity of coming at the truth ; but upon his return to Jerusalem, when Mephibosheth appears before him, and pleads his own cause, we find this the decision of it, — " Why speakest thou any more of thy matters 1 I have said, thou and Ziba divide the land :" which words must not be understood as if he appointed at the time an equal division of the estate between Mephibosheth and his servant, (for where would the justice of such a sentence be 1) but rather, that he re- voked the order he had given to Ziba, upon the supposed forfeiture of his master, and put things now upon the same establishment they were at first. " I have said," i.e. " My first grant shall stand, when I decreed that Mephibosheth should be lord of the whole estate, and Ziba his steward to manage it for him." Thus, though we are not obliged to vindicate David in every passage of his life, and think some of the crying sins he was guilty of utterly inexcusa- ble, yet (if we except these) we cannot but think that, although he was a very tender and indulgent parent, yet he was no encourager of vice in his own family, or tame con- niver at it in others, had he not been restrained, by reasons of state, sometimes from punishing it ; that he was true to his promises, just in his distributions, and prudent, though not crafty, in his military transactions ; *' of a singular presence of mind, (as Josephus speaks of him,) to make the best of what was before him, and of as sharp a foresight for improving of all advantages, and obviating all difficul- ties, that were like to happen ;" tender to all persons in distress, kind to his friends, forgiving to his enemies, and, when at any time he was forced to use severity, was only in retaliation of what other people had done to him. — Stackhouse. Ver. 13. And as David and his men went by the way, Shimei went along- on the hill's side over ag-ainst him, and cursed as he went, and threw stones at him, and cast dust. Who, in the East, has not oflen witnessed a similar scene 1 Listen to the maledictions : they are of such a nature that evil spirits only could have suggested them. Look at the enraged miscreant : he dares not come near for fear of punishment, but he stands at a distance, vociferates his imprecaiions, violently throws about his hands ; then stoops to the ground, and takes up handfuls of dust, throws it in the air* and exclaims, " Soon shalt thou be as that — thy mouth shall soon be full of it — look, look, thou cursed one, as this dust, so shalt thou be." — Roberts. In the East, the ris^ht of calling an offender to account is claimed either by the person who receives the injury, or bis nearest relation; and the same person, with the per- mission or connivance of his people, sustains at once the character of party, judge, and executioner. In such a state of things, we are not to be surprised if the exercise of justice be often precipitate and tumuhuary. The act of the Philistines, inhuming the spouse of Samson and her father with fire, was entirely of this character ; not the result of a regular sentence, but the summary vengeance of an incensed multitude. In the law of Moses, the right of the private avenger was distinctly recognised ; but to prevent the dreadful effects of sudden and personal ven- geance, cities of refuge were appointed at convenient dis- tances through the land of promise, to which the manslayer might flee for safety, till he coul,d be brought to a regular trial, before a court of justice. In almost every part of Asia, those who demand justice against a criminal throw dust upon him, signifying that he deserves to lose his life, and be cast into the grave ; and that this is the true inter- pretation of the action, is evident from an imprecation in common use among the Turks and Persians, Be covered with earth; Earth be upon thy head. We have two re- markable instances of casting dust recorded in scripture ; the first is that of Shimei, who gave vent to his secret hos- tility to David, when he fled before his rebellious son, by throwing stones at him, and casting dust. It was an an- cient custom, in those warm and arid countries, to lay the dust before a person of distinction, and particularly before kings and princes, by sprinkling the ground with water. To throw dust into the air while a person was passing, was therefore an act of great disrespect ; to do so before a sovereign prince, an indecent outrage. But it is clear from the explanation of the custom, that Shimei meant more than disrespect and outrage to an afliicted king, whose subject he was ; he intended to signify by that action, that David was unfit to live, and that the time was at last arrived to offer him a sacrifice to the ambition and ven- geance of the house of Saul.— Paxton. Ver. 20. Then said Absalom to Ahithophel, Give counsel among you what we shall do. 21. And Ahithophel said unto Absalom, Go in unto thy father's concubines, which he hath left to keep the house ; and all Israel shall hear that thou art abhorred of thy father. The wives of the conquered king were always the prop- erty of the conqueror : and, in possessing these, he ap- peared to possess the right to the kingdom. Herodolus^ b. , iii, cap. 68. informs us, that Smerdis having seized on the- Persian throne, after the death of Cambyses, espoused all the wives of his predecessor. The choosing or confirming of a new king in Guinea, seldom continues long in dispute ; for the eldest son no sooner hears of the king's death, than he immediately makes his interest among his friends, to take possession of the late king's court and wives : and succeeding happily ir these particulars, he need not doubt the remainder, for th( commonalty will not easily consent that af;er that he shslj be driven from the throne : this seems somewhat like Atw salom's design on his father David. To accomplish this design, the younger brother's party are always carefu' enough that he is near at hand, in order to take possessioi| of the court. (Bosman's Guinea.) The name of Quiteva is common to the sovereign lord of the country bordering on the river Sofala in Ethiopia. He maintains a numbei of wives, the chief of whom are his near relations, ant are denominated his queens ; the residue are regardec merely as concubines. As soon as the Q,uiteva ceases U live, a successor is chosen, capable of governing with wis dom and prudence ; and, indeed, should he be deficient h this respect, it would be enough that a majority of tb| king's concubines should join in his favour, as on thes< the possession of the throne depends. He therefore re pairs to the royal palace, where he meets Avith some of th( concubines of the late king, and with their consent b€ seats himself on the throne prepared for him in the mid.st of a large hall ; when seated here, a curtain is drawn he- fore him and his wives: hence he issues orders for hi? proclamation through the streets ; this is the signal for the people to flock to render him homage and swear obedience, a ceremony which is performed amid great rejoicings.— BURDER. Chap. 17. 2 SAMUEL. 221 From the polygamy of the Israelitish monarcns, there •\Tose a singular law, which I can only illustrate by exam- plea from the Bible, without finding any thing similar in profane history; which, however, only makes these exam- ples the clearer. It consisted in this, that the successor to the crown inherited the seraglio of his predecessor ; and it was considered as a step to the throne, even to marry the mistresses of the deceased monarch. In this way, David succeeded to the concubines of Saul, although he was his father-in-law, 2 Sam. xii. 8. And after he had fled from Absalom, Ahithophel, who is described as a man of the greatest abilities, as well as the greatest wicked- ness, counselled this rebellious son to lie publicly with his father's ten concubines, to annihilate, in hesitating minds, all hope of a reconciliation between them ; 2 Sam. xvi. 21 — 23. Now incest is such an abominable crime, and so expressly contrary to the Mosaic law, that such proceedings must have been followed by the most direful consequences, if these concubines had not" been considered, not as David's, but as the king's ; and as belonging to the state, not to the individual ; so that sleeping with them formed part of the ceremony of taking possession of the throne. — After David's death, Bathsheba, the mother of his successor, Solomon, was entreated by his brother Adonijah, to obtain the royal permission to marry Abishag, the Shunamite. But Solo- mon so fully saw through his brother's designs, and what effect the acceding to his request would have among the people, that he answered his mother, " Rather ask the kingdom for him too," and immediately caused him to be put to death, 1 Kings ii. 13 — 25. Of the origin of this strange law I can find no traces in the great kingdoms of the East ; and yet most certainly these kings of Israel, as yet but novices in royalty, must have derived it, not from Is- raelitish, but foreign usage. It could scarcely have arisen in an hereditary kingdom, in which such incestuous proce- dure would have become too notorious and disgusting. Most probably it first arose among the beggarly elective monarchies in the neighbourhood, where it was found too expensive to provide every new king with a new seraglio; perhaps in the kingdom of Edom, whose needy practices ihe Israelites were wont at first to adopt. After Solomon's time, I find no further traces of it. — Michaelis. CHAPTER XVII. Ver. 8. For, said Hushai, thou knowest thy fa- ther and his men, that they be mighty men, and they be chafed in their minds, as a bear robbed of her whelps in the field : and thy father is a man of war, and will not lodge with the people. The Hindoos are as much afraid of bears as any other animal in the forest ; hence, when the letter-carriers and j others have to travel through districts infested by them, they i are always armed with a crooked knife, in the shape of a I sickle: thus, when the bear is preparing to give them a hug, i one cut from the instrument will send it off. When the fe- i male is robbed of her whelps, she is said to be more fierce I than any other animal : hence, many sayings refer to her : rage, and are applied to the fury of violent men. " I will ; tear thee to pieces as a bear which has cubbed." " Begone, ! or I will jump upon thee as a bear." When a termagant : goes with her children to scold, it is said, "There goes the ' she-bear and her whelps." — Roberts. 1 The furious passions of the female bear never mount so ; high, nor burn so fiercely, as when she is deprived of her i youn;?. When she returns to her den, and misses the ob- * ject of her love and care, she becomes almost frantic with ' rac:e. Disregarding every consideration of danger to her- self, she attacks with great ferocity every animal that comes in her way; and in the bitterness of her heart will dare to : attack eveji a band of armed men. The Russians of Kamt- ; schatka never venture to fire on a young bear when the ; mother is near : for if the cub drop, she becomes enraged 1 to a degree little short of madness, and if she gets sight of ' the enemy, will only quit her revenge with her life. (Cook's Vdyages.) A more desperate attempt can scarcely be per- ! formed than to carry off her young in her absence. Her ' scent enables her to track the plunderer; and unless he '. has reached some place of safety before the infuriated ani- mal overtake him, his only safety is in dropping one of the cubs, and continuing to flee ; for the mother, attentive to its safety, carries it home to her den before she renews the pursuit. — BURDER. Ver. 12. So shall we come upon him in some place where he shall be found, and we will light upon him as the dew falleth on the ground. This is very beautiful and expressive. The dew in Palestine, as in, several other climates, falls fast and sudden, and is therefore no unapt emblem of an active, expeditious soldiery. It was, perhaps, for this reason that the Romans called their light-armed forces Rorarii. The dew falls upon every spot of the earth ; not a blade of grass escapes it. A numerous army resembles it in this respect. It is able to search everywhere. — Burder. Ver. 13. Moreover, if he be gotten into a city, then shall all Israel bring ropes to that city, and we will draw it into the river, until there be not one small stone found there. On advancing, the chopdars or heralds proclaimed the titles of this princely cow-keeper, Futty Sihng, in the usual hyperbolical style. One of the most insignificant looking men I ever saw, then became the destroyer of nations, the leveller of mountains, the exhauster of the ocearw After commanding every inferior mortal to make way for this exalted prince, the heralds called aloud to the animal cre- ation, Retire, ye serpents; fly, ye locusts; approach not, guanas, lizards, and reptiles, while your lord and master condescends to set his foot on the earth ! Arrogant as this language may appear, it is less so than the oriental pageant- ry in general. The sacred writings afford many instances of such hyperbole. None more so than Hushai's speech to Absalom. — Forbes. Ver. 17. Now Jonathan and Ahimaaz stayed by En-rogel : (for they might not be seen to come into the city :) and a wench went and told them : and they went and told King David. ■ In the East, the washing of foul linen is performed by women by the sides of rivers and fountains. Dr. Chandler {Travels in Asia Minor, p. 21) says, that "the women re- sort to the fountains by the houses, each with a two-han- dled earthen jar on her back, or thrown over her shoulder, for water. They assemble at one without the village or town, if no river be near, to wash their linen, which is af- terward spread on the ground or bushes to dry." May not this circumstance, says Mr. Harmer, serve to confirm the conjecture, that the young woman that was sent to En-rogel, went out of the city with a bundle of linen, as if she were going to wash if? Nothing was more natural, or better calculated to elude jealousy. — Burder. Ver. 19. And the woman took and spread a covering over the well's mouth, and spread ground corn thereon ; and the thing was not known. This was done to conceal Jonathan and Ahimaaz, who had gone down the well to escape from the servants of Ab- salom. Wells in the East have their mouths level with the ground, hence, nothing is more easy than to put a mat or covering over the opening to conceal them from the sight. Who has not seen corn or flour spread on mats in the sun to dry 1 The woman affected to have this object in view when she spread a covering over the well: her " ground corn" was spread thereon to dry in the sun. The men were in the well, and when Absalom's servants came, and inquired, " Where is Ahimaaz and Jonathan ;" she said, " They be gone over the brook of water." In the Kandian war great numbers were required to follow the army as bearers, cooks, and messengers, and such was the aversion of the people to the duty, that government was obliged to use force to compel them to go. And it was no uncommon thing, when the officers were seen to approach a cottage, for the husband or sons to be concealed as were Ahimaaz and Jon athan . — R oberts. 2fe2 2 SAMUEL. Chap, la Ver. 28. Brought beds, and basins, and earthen vessels, and wheat, and barley, and flour, and parched corn, and beans, and lentiles, and parch- ed 'pulse. Parched corn is a kind of food still retained in the East, as Hasselquist informs us : " On the road from Acre to Seide, we saw a herdsman eating his dinner, consisting of half-ripe ears of wheat, which he roasted and ate with as good an appetite as a Turk does his pillau. In Egypt such food is much eaten by the poor, being the ears of maize or Turkish wheat, and of their durra, which is a kind of millet. When this food was first invented, art was in a simple state ; yet the custom is still continued in some nations, where the inhabitants have not even at this time learned to pamper nature." The flour of parched barley is the chief provision which the Moors of West Barbary make for travelling. It is indeed much used as a part of their diet at home. " What is most used by travellers is zumeet, tumeet, or flour of parched barley for limereece. They are ail three made of parched barley-flour, which they carry in a leath- ern satchel. Zumeet is the flower mixed with honey, but- ter, and spice ; tumeet is the same flour done up with origan oil ; and limereece is only mixed with water, and so drank. This quenches thirst much better than water alone, satiates a hungry appetite, cools and refreshes tired and weary spirits, overcoming those ill effects- which a hot sun ancl fatiguing journey might occasion." (Jones.) Mr. Harmer proposes this extract as an illustration of the passage now cited. — BuRDER. Ver. 29. And honey, and butter, and sheep, and cheese of kine, for David, and for the people. This, perhaps, was flesh of kine, or beef, prepared in such a manner as we call potted, by beating and bruising. The eastern people in modern times prepare potted flesh for food on a march or journey. Thus Busbequius, speak- ing of the Turkish soldiers going on an expedition into Persia, says, " Some of them filled a leathern bag with beef dried, and reduced to a kind of meal, which they use with great advantage, as afibrding a strong nourishment." And Dr. Shaw mentions potted flesh as part of the provisions carried with him in his journey through the Arabian des- erts. — BURDER. CHAPTER XVIII. Ver. 8. For the battle was there scattered over the face of all the country : and the wood de- voured more people that day than the sword devoured. The land of promise cannot boast, like many other coun- tries, of extensive woods ; but considerable thickets of trees and of reeds sometimes arise to diversify and adorn the scene. Between the Lake Samochonites and the sea of Tiberias, the river Jordan is almost concealed by shady trees from the view of the traveller. When the waters of the Jordan are low, the Lake Samochonites is only a marsh, for the most part dry and overgrown with shrubs and reeds. The lake of Tiberias is bordered with reeds; while the banks of the river on both sides, are shaded with planes, alders, poplars, tamarisks, and reeds of different kinds. In these thickets, among other ferocious animals, the wild boar seeks a covert from the burning rays of the sim. Large herds of them are sometimes to be seen on the banks of the river, near the sea of Tiberias, lying among the reeds, or feeding under the trees. Such moist and shady places are in all countries the favourite haunts of these fierce and dan- gerous animals. Those marshy coverts are styled woods in the sacred scriptures ; for the "wild boar of the wood is the name which that creature receives from the royal Psalmist : " The boar out of the wood doth waste it; "and the wild oeast of the field doth devour it." The wood of Ephraim, where the battle was fought between the forces of Ab- salom and the servants of David, was probably a place of the same kind ; for the sacred historian observes, that the wood devoured more people that day, than the sword devoured. Some have supposed the meaning of this pas- sfige to be, that the soldiers of Absalom were destroyed by the wild beasts of the wood ; but it can scarcely be supposed, thai in the reign of David, when the land of promise was crowded with inhabitants, the wild beasts could be so nu- merous in one of the woods as to cause such a destruction. But if their numbers had been so great, we know that, un- less they had been detained contrary to their natural dis- positions by the miraculous interposition of Heaven, for the purpose of executing his righteous vengeance on the followers of Absalom, tetimidated by the approach of two hostile armies, and still more by the tumult of the battle, they must have sought their safety in flight, rather than have stayed to devour the discomfited party. Besides, we do not hear that one of David's men perished by the wood : were they miraculously preserved ; or, were the wild beasts able to distinguish between the routed army and the victors, and politic enough to side with the strongest % We are not without an express revelation, or at least without necessity, to suppose a miraculous interposition. The scene of the expeditions which the Turks undertook against Faccar- dine, the famous emir, in the fifteenth century, was chiefly in the woods of mount Lebanon, which all travellers agree furnish a retreat to numerous wild beasts, yet the historian says not one word of either Turk or Maronite being injured by them, in his whole narrative. Absalom himself was the only person who properly perished by the wood; being caught by the hair of his head, of which he had been so vain, in the branches of a large oak, where Joab found him, and thrust him through with a dart. But, supposing the wood of Ephraim to have been a morass covered with trees and bushes, like the haunts of the wild boar near the banks of Jordan, the difficulty is easily removed. It is certain that such a place has more than once proved fatal to con- tending armies, partly by suffocating those who in the hurry of flight inadvertently venture over places incapable of supporting them, and partly by retarding them till their pursuers come up and cut them to pieces. In this manner a greater number of men than fell in the heat of battle may be destroyed. The archbishop of Tyre informs us, that one of the Christian kings of Jerusalem lost some of his troops in a marshy vale of this country, from their igno- rance of the paths which lead through it, although he had no enemy to molest his march. The number of those who died was small ; but in what numbers would they have perished, may we suppose, had they been forced to flee, like the men of Absalom, before a victorious and exasper- ated enemy % Lewis II., king of Hungary, lost his life in a bog in his own kingdom, in the sixteenth century: and according to Zozimus, Decius the Roman emperor perish- ed in a fen, with his whole army. It may, therefore, be justly concluded, that Absalom's army perished neither by the trees of the wood, like their guilty leader, nor by the wild beasts which occupied its recesses ; but by the deceit- ful quagmires with which it abounded. — Paxton. Ver. 11. And Joab said unto the man that told him, And, behold, thou sawest him ; and why didst thou not smite him there to the ground ? and I would have given thee ten shekels of sil- ver, and a girdlfe. Among us, here in Europe, the distinction between hon- orary and pecuniary rewards is so great, that we often- times can hardly think of jumbling them together as an ac- knowledgment of public services; and the same person that would receive the first with emotions of great pleasure, would think himself affronted by one of a pecuniary kind ; but it is otherwise in the East, and it was so anciently. De Tott did many great services to the Turkish empire, in the time of their late war with Russia, and the Turks were disposed to acknowledge them by marks of honour. " His highness," said the first minister, speaking of the grand seignior, " has ordered me to bestow on you this ;5ublic ma^rk of his esteem," and, at the same time, made a sign io the master of the ceremonies to invest me with the pelisse; while the hasnadar presented me with a purse of 200 se- quins. The lively French officer was hurt by the. offer of the sequins. " I directly turned towards those who had ac companied me, and showing them my pelisse, I have re , ceived, said I, with gratitude, this proof of the grand seii:-' nior's favour; do you return thanks to the vizier for this purse, it is his gifl. This expedient, which I preferred to a discussion of our different customs, was a sufficient Chap. 18. *i SAMUEL. 223 lesson to the vizier, at the same time that it disengaged me from the embarrassment of oriental politeness." He then in a note adds, " This Turkish custom of giving money oc- casioned the greatest mortification to M. De Bonneval, that a man, like him, could receive. The ambassador extraor- dinary, from the emperor, who in the Austrian army had been in an inferior station to the refugee, dined, as is cus- tomary, with the vizier. The Porte had chosen Kiathana, for the place of this entertainment. M. De Bonneval had orders to repair thither with the corps of bombardiers, of which he was commander. When the exercise was over, he was sent for by the vizier, who gave him a handful of .sequins, which his situation obliged him to accept, with submission." Just thus we find Joab would have rewarded an Israelitish soldier of his army, in the days of King Da- vid, who saw Absalom hanging in a tree : " Why didst thou not smite him there to the ground, and I would have given the«! ten shekels of silver, and a girdle V 2 Sam. xviii. 11. The girdle would have been an honorary reward, like De Tott's ermined vest; the ten shekels, or half crowns, would have been a pecuniary recompense, like the 200 sequins De Tott disdained to receive. I may add, that a furred robe, in general, is no distinguishing badge of dignity, for it may be worn by wealthy people in private life, who can bear the ex[)ense ; so that there is no ground to suppose Joab's giving a girdle to the soldier would have been conferring some military honour, somewhat like knighting him, as, if I remember right, some have imagined : it would have been simply a valuable present, and enabling him in after- time to appear with such a girdle as the rich wore, instead of the girdle of a peasant, but united with the consciousness and the reputation of its being acquired by doing some public service, and not the mere effect of being descended from a wealthy family. The apparatus which some of the eastern people make use of to gird themselves with is very mean. The common Arabs, according to De la Roque, use a girt adorned with leather ; and their women make use of a cord, or strip of cloth : but some of the A^ab girdles are very rich, according to this writer. The girdle Joab proposed t^ give was doubtless designed by him to be understood to be one of such value, as to be answerable to the supposed importance of the service he wished the man had performed, as well as his own dignity. So Symon Simeonis, an Irish traveller to the Holy Land, in the year 13'2-2, tells us, " That the Saracens of Egypt rarely, if ever, girded themselves with any thing but a towel, on which they kneeled to say their prayers, except their people of figure, who wore girdles like those of ladies, very broad, all of silk, and. superbly adorned with gold and silver, in which they extremely pride themselves." I cannot well finish this article without remarking, from what the French baron says concerning himself, what strong disagreeable impressions of an erroneous kind may be made upon the mind of a European at the offering some of the Asiatic presents, which are not only not affronting in their views, but designed to do those honour to whom they are pre- sented, since De Tott could not get the better of it, though he perfectly knew the innocency of the intention, and had resided long enough, one would have thought, in the country, to have destroyed the impression. — Harmer. To loose the girdle and give it to another, was among the Orientals, a token of great confidence and affection. Thus to ratify the covenant which Jonathan made with David, and to express his cordial regard for his friend, among other things he gave him his girdle. A girdle curi- ously and richly wrought was, among the ancient Hebrews, a mark of honour, and sometimes bestowed as a reward of merit ; for this was the recompense which Joab declared he meant to bestow on the man who put Absalom to death : " Whv didst thou not smite him there to the ground, and I would have given thee ten shekels of silver, and a girdle." The reward was certainly meant to correspond with the importance of the service which he expected him to per- form, and the dignity of his own station as commander-in- chief: we may therefore suppose it was not a common one of leather, or plain worsted, but of costly materials and richly adorned ; for people of rank and fashion in the East wear very broad girdles, all of silk, and superbly orna- mented with gold and silver, and precious stones, of which they are extremely proud, regarding them as the tokens of their superior station, and the proof of their riches. — Paxton. Ver. 17. And they took Absalom, and cast him into a great pit in the wood, and laid a very great heap of stones upon him : and all Israel fled every one to his tent. To mark the spot where the chiefs were buried, and to remain at the same time as a memorial of the battle in which they fell, their surviving friends raised over them a heap of stones. This practice may be traced to the primi- tive ages of the world ; for when Absalom was defeated and slain, " they cast him into a great pit in the wood, and laid a very great heap of stones upon him." This monu- mental heap was not intended to indicate that Absalom deserved to be stoned as a rebellious son, but merely to mark, according to a very common and a very ancient custom, the grave of that ambitious and unnatural prince. It was usual in the East, indeed, to distinguish any remark- able place or event by a heap of stones. All the Moham- medans that go in pilgrimage to mount Sinai, visit a rock, on which the form of a camel's foot is imprinted, which they foolishly suppose to be the animal that Mohammed rode ; and, therefore, in honour of their prophet, they bring ev^ery one a stone, till, by continual accumulation, a large heap has risen near the place, Jacob, and his family too, raised a heap of stones in commemoration of the covenant so hap- pily concluded between him and Laban, on mount Gilead. That " heap of witness" informed every passenger that it was raised in memory of some interesting event; and every relation that brought a stone to the heap, made himself a witness to the agreement, as well as recommended it to the attention of others. The surviving warriors, too, might bring every man his stone, in token of their respect for the deceased, to raise a monumental heap over the body of the hero who had led them to battle and to victory, which should arrest the notice of the passing traveller, and bear witness to future times of their attachment and regret. — Paxton. Ver. 18. Now Absalom in his lifetime had taken and reared up for himself a pillar, which is in the king's dale : for he said, I have no son to keep my name in remembrance : and he called the pillar after his own name : and it is called Unto this day Absalom's Place. On the east, we came to the reputed tomb of Absalom, resembling nearly, in the size, form, and the decoration of its square base, that of Zacharias, before described ; except that it is sculptured with the metopes and triglyphs of the Doric order. This is surmounted by a sharp conical dome, of the form used in our modern parasols, having large mouldings, resembling ropes running round its base, and on the summit something like an imitation of flame. The dome is of masonry, and on the eastern side there is a square aperture in it. It is probable that this monument really occupies the place of that mentioned to have been set up by him whose name it bears. 2 Sam. xviii. 18. Jo- sephus, in relating the same circumstance, calls the pillar a marble one ; he fixes its distance at two furlongs from Jerusalem, and says it was named Absalom's Hand.— Buckingham. Ver. 24. And David sat between the two gates : and the watchman went up to the roof over the gate unto the wall, and lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold a man running alone. The watchman, in a time of danger, seems to have take^ his station in a tower, which was built over the gate of the city. We may form a tolerably distinct idea of the ancient towers in Palestine, from the description which the sacred historian gives us of one, in the entrance of Mahanaim : " And David sat between the two gates, and the watchman went up to the roof over the gate unto the wall, and lifted up his eyes and looked, and behold a man running alone. The watchman cried and told the king; and the king said. If he is alone, there is tidings in his mouth. And the watchman saw another man running ; and the watchman called unto the porter, and said, Behold, another man run- 224 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 19. ning alone ; and the kine: said, He also bringeth tidings." When the tidings were announced, the historian observes, " the king was much moved, and went up to the chamber over the gate and wept." It is afterward added, " Then the king arose and sat in the gate ; and they told unto all the people saying, Behold th ? king doth sit in the gate ; and all the people came before the king, for Israel had fled every man to his tent." From this description it appears, that the tower in the entrance of Mahanaim, had two pair of gates, at some distance from each other; in a small room, which was often found bv the side of these fortified gates, the door of which opened into the passage between them, sat the king, waiting, in fearful suspense, the issue of the contest, for it cannot be supposed he sat in the pas- sage itself, which had been at once unbecoming his dignity, and incommodious to the passengers entering or leaving the city. "We find a watchman stationed on the top of this tower, to which he Avent up by a staircase from the passage, which, like the roof of their dwellinghouses, was flat, for the purpose of descrying at a distance those that were ap- proaching the place, or repelling the attacks of an enemy. The observations made by the watchman were not com- municated by him immediately to the king, but by the intervention of a warder at the outer gate of the tower ; and it appears, that a private staircase led from the lower room in which the king was sitting, to the upper room over the gateway; for by that communication he retired to give full vent to his sorrow. The only circumstance involved in any doubt, is in what part of this building he sat, (for it is evident he continued in some part of the gate,) when he returned his thanks to the array for their exer- tions in his favo-ur ; or in the language of the historian, " spake to the hearts of his servants," and received their congratulations. It is somewhat uncertain whether he gave audience to his people in the upper room, where he lamented in strains so afiecting, the death of Absalom, or in the little chamber between the two gates, where he waited the arrival of the messengers, or in some other part of the building. The ancient custom of sitting in the gate on solemn occasions, rather favours the opinion, that Da- vid went down from the apartment above the gate, to the chamber in the side of the passage. This custom, which may be traced to the remotest antiquity, is still observed in the East; for when Pococke returned from viewing the town of ancient Byblus, the sheik and the elders were sitting in the gate of the city, after the manner of their ancestors. — Paxton. Ver. 25. And the watchman cried, and told the king. And the king said, If he be alone, there is tidings in his mouth. And he came apace, and drew near. This was said by David when the watchman told him that there was a man running alone. He proved to be Ahimaaz, who had escaped from the well, and had run to tell David, " All is well." Is a man se^ to run fast, it is said, "Ah! there is news in his mouth." "Why have you come so fast T'— " In my mouth there is news." To a man in trouble it is often said, " Fear not, a man will soon come with tidings in his mouth." — Roberts. Ver. 32. And the king said unto Cushi, Is the young man Absalom safe? And Cushi an- swered, The enemies of my lord the king, and all that rise against thee to do thee hurt, be as that young man is. This was a delicate way of telling David that the rebel Absalom was dead, A person, in communicating, by letter, intelligence of the death of a friend, does not always say, in so many plain terms, " He is dead ;" but, " Would that all our enemies were now as our friend Muttoo." " Ah ! were they all as he, we should have peace in our village." A son, in writing to an uncle concerning the death of his ftuher, says, "Ah! the children of "your brother are now given unto the Lord." " Would that our enemies were now as our father ; they will now rejoice over us." — Roberts. CHAPTER XIX. Ver. 13. And say ye to Amasa, Art thou not of my bone, and of my flesh 1 God do so to me, and more also, if thou be not captain of the host before me continually in the room of Joab. 14. And he bowed the heart of all the men of Judah, even as the heart of one man ; so that they sent this word unto the king. Return thou, and all thy servants. Mr. Le Clerc and others object, that David's resolution to remove Joab from the chief command of the army, was but an unthankful return for the victory which that officer had just gained him, and for his attachment to his interest all along, and therefore David's conduct in tl.is instance was imprudent and unaccountable. What Joab's share in obtaining this victory was, the history doth not say, Abishai and Ittai, who each commanded a third part of the forces, might, as for anything that appears, as much contribute to the victory over the rebels, as Joab. But be that as it will, the imprudence of David's conduct is effect- ually disproved by the event ; and that it was not unac- countable is certain, because of the evident prudence of it; especially if it be true, and I think it certainly is true, that Joab had now lost the favour of his master, of which the murder of Abner, the killing cf Absalom, in direct con- tradiction to David's order, and lastly, his want of sympa- thy, and his indelicacy in the present instance, were the undoubted causes. And surely it could be nothing unac- countable, nor argue any great ingratitude, to turn out an imperious general, even after he had helped to gain a vic- tory, who had stained his laurels by the treasonable murder of the king's own son, in defiance of his most express com- mand, and then instantly threatened him with a fresh rebel- lion, if he did not openly appear to justify and approve his crimes : crimes, that a successful battle few will think to be a sufficient atonement for, or a just reason to exempt him from disgrace, and the punishment he deserved. The ancient Roman discipline was much more severe and rig- orous than this, and a victory obtained, if contrary to the general's orders, was punished with death. When T. Manlius, the son of Manlius the consul, upon a challenge of Metius, one of the generals of the Latins, with whom the Romans were then at war, had engaged him in single combat, slain him, taken his spoils, and presented them in triumph to his father, the consul immediately ordered him to be beheaded in sight of the whole army, because it was an express breach of his orders; telling his son, " If thou hast any thing of my blood in thee, thou thyself wilt not, I think, refuse to restore, by thy punishment, that mili- tary discipline, which hath been impaired by thy offence." In like manner, when Papirius, the Roman dictator, had commanded Fabius, the master of his horse, not to engage the enemy during his absence, Fabius being informed that the army'of the Samnites were in a state of great disorder, attacked them with his forces, entirely routed them. ?nd slew twenty thousand of them on the field of battle. The dictator, upon his return to the army, in a council of officers, ordered him to be beheaded, because in breach of the rules of war, and the ancient discipline, he had dared, contrary to his orders, to engage with the enemy. He was however at last saved by the intercession of the Roman people. David's removirig Joab from his command was a much less punishment for much more aggravated crimes. As to the promise to Amasa, of constituting him general in Joab's room, the prudence of this may be also easily vindicated. For Amasa stood in the same degree of con- sanguinity to David as Joab did, and the offer to him ot making him captain-general must, as it has been well ob- served, have been influenced by the personal qualities of the man, the importance of gaining him over, he being a person of great power and authority, and a resentment against Joab for the murder of Abner and Absalom. Be- sides, I doubt not but that David thought he should now he able to break Joab's power, and bring him to an ac- count for his repeated assassinations and treasons, as well as fix Amasa for ever in his interest, by placing so high a degree of confidence in him, as to give him the com- mand of all the forces in bis kingdom. This hath been frequently the method by which great men have endeav- Chap. 19. 2 SAMUEL. 225 o'lred to gain over their enemies, .and it argues a real gen- erosity of soul, of which little minds are utterly incapable, to u'in an adversary to his duty, by such unexpected instan- ces of confidence and friendship. When Cinna, the grand- son of Pompey, and other great men, conspired against Augustus, he not only pardoned them, but nominated Cinna consul for the ensuing year ; and Caesar not only spared Brutus, after he had appeared in arms against him, but took him into favour as his intimate friend, and intrusted him with the government of Gaul, — Chandler. Ver. 24. And Mephibosheth the son of Saul came down to meet the king, and had neither dressed his feet, nor trimmed his beard, nor washed his clothes, from the day the king departed until the day he came again in peace. They almost universally die them black, by an operation not very pleasant, and necessary to be repeated generally once a fortnight. It is always performed in the hot bath, where the hair being well saturated, takes the colour better. A thick paste of khenna is first made, which is largely plastered over the beard, and which, after remaining an hour, is all completely washed off, and leaves the hair of a very strong orange colour, bordering upon thatof brickdust. After this, as thick a paste is made of the leaf of the indigo, which previously has been pounded to a fine powder, and of this also a deep layer is put upon the beard ; but this second process, to be taken well, requires full two hours. During all this operation the patient lies quietly flat upon his back; while the die (more particularly the indigo, which is a great astringent) contracts the features of his face in a very mournful manner, and causes all the lower parts of the visage to smart and burn. When the indigo IS at last washed off, the beard is of a very dark bottle-green_, and becomes a jet black only when it has met the air for twenty-four hours. Some, indeed, are content with the khenna or orange colour ; others, more fastidious, prefer a beard quite blue. The people of Bokhara are famous for their blue beards. — Morier. Ver. 24. And Mephibosheth the son of Saul came down to meet the king, and had neither dressed his feet, nor trimmed his beard, nor washed his clothes, from the day the king de- parted until the day he came again in peace. 25. And it came to pass, when he was come to Jerusalem to meet the king, that the king said unto him, Wherefore wentest not thou with me, Mephibosheth? 26. And he an- swered, My lord, O king, my servant deceived me: for thyservant said, I will saddle me an ass, that I may ride thereon, and go to the king ; because thy servant is lame. 27. And he hath slandered thy servant unto my lord the king ; but my lord the king is as an angel of God : do therefore what is good in thine eyes. 28. For all of my father's house were but dead men before my lord the king : yet didst thou set thy servant among them that did eat at thine own table. What right therefore have I yet to cry any more unto the king? 29. And the king said unto him. Why speakest thou any more of thy matters ? I have said, Thou and Ziba divide the land. 30. And- Mephibosheth said unto the king, Yea, let him take all, foras- much as my lord the king is come again in peace unto his own house. This conduct of David to Mephibosheth is objected against, as. a very ungenerous and unjust action ; in that, when Ziba's accusation against Mephibosheth was found to be false, instead of equitably punishing the asperser of innocence, and reinstating Mephibosheth in his former favour, he restored him but half the forfeiture for his sup- 29 posed guilt, leaving the villain Ziba in the quiet possession' of the other half, as the reward of his treachery. Suppo- sing this account true, that Mephibosheth had but half his patrimony restored to him, there might be reasons of state, reasons of great prudence and equity, that might induce David, at that time, to give this check "to the house of Saul ; especially if David had any suspicion that Mephibosheth had really behaved ill, and as Shimei, one of Saul's family, had used him with peculiar marks of indignity, and dis- covered that they wanted only the opportunity to revenge themselves on him, and place one of Saul's house upon the throne of Israel. But I think there is great reason to ques- tion, whether the behaviour of Mephibosheth was so inno- cent as hath been asserted, during the progress of the re- bellion. The late ingenious and learned Mr. Hallet and others, think he was guilty -and deserved punishment ; and after having reviewed his apology to David for not accom- panying him in his flight from Jerusalem, with the utmost impartiality and care, that apology doth not seem to me sufficient wholly to exculpate him. " For what is the apolo- gy he makes 1 Why, only this ; that he said, " he would saddle him an ass, and go on it to the king, because he was lame, and could not go on foot." Why then, what hinder- ed him from saddling his ass, and riding afler his royal patron and benefactor 1 Surely there were more asses than one to be had at Jerusalem, and he had servants enough of his own to have saddled one, had he been disposed to go after David. For when that prince was restored, he found means to wait on him, without Ziba's assistance; and I suppose, the same means might have been found, if he had pleased, to have attended David when he fled, as well as to go to meet him when he returned. He pretends indeed that Ziba deceived him; but he doth not say how, nor offer any proof of it ; nor could he deceive him about the get- ting him an ass, because he could have got one, whether Ziba would procure him one or not. So that his justifica- tion was as lame as his feet, and, as far as I can judge, is but a poor shuffling vindication of his innocence. He seems to me to have been very well pleased to stay at Jerusalem, and wait the issue of the rebellion, as not knowing, but that du- ring theconftision of affairs, some fortunate circumstances might arise, by which, as heir to Saul's house, he might be advanced tothe throneinthe roomboth of David and his re- bellious son; The only circumstance that can be alleged in his favour is, that he did not take the usual care of himself, as to his cleanliness and dress, but appeared in the squalid habit of a mourner. But this might be merely political, and would equally serve to excite compassion to himselt among the peoplej.lo see Saul's heir reduced to this forlorn condition ; ana to provide some excuse for himself to Da- vid, should his affairs at last take a favourable turn, and to urge as an argument and proof of his affection and concern for him, during the continuance of his troubles. This was a well-known custom among the Romans, and other na- tions, for those who were accused of any crimes, to clothe themselves with a black garment, to let their beards and hair grow, and to appear in a negligent, dirty manner, in order to raise the public pity in their behalf. And not only thus, but the friends and pa'trons of such unhappy persons, appeared publicly in the same manner, as those whose cause they espoused. Thus Cicero tells us, that the whole senate, and all good men, did it to express their grief on his account, and the better to obtain his recall from banish- ment. Yea, this very art hath been made use of by a de- throned prince to obtain the recovery of his crown and kingdom. Thus Ptolemy Philometor, king of Egypt, being driven out of his kingdom by his brother Physcon, came attended only by a few servants to Rome, squalore obsihis, covered over with filth, to implore the assistance of the senate. And in this wretched condition he presented him- self before them. They advised him, that deporitis fordi- bus, laying aside his wretched habit, lie should petition for an audience. So that this affectation of Mephibosheth, oi appearing at Jerusalem with these external marks of grief, was really no proof of his affection to David, but might be with an artful intention to serve himself. Ziba's charge against him was direct and positive, and the only answer is, that Ziba had slandered him. So that here are two positive assertions contrary to one another. Ziba's charge had probability to support it; because it is natural to sup- pose, that Mephibosheth might think that he had, as heir to Saul, some claim to the crown, and would be glad of 226 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 20 any occasion to recover it, that he might not be beholden to David's generosity, and live by courtesy at his table ; and that he might mention it to Ziba, as he also was one of Saul's house and family. Mephibosheth's answer to the charge had nothing satisfactory in it, because he could never want an ass, or a servant to have conveyed him, had he desired or resolved to make use of them. Besides, as Ziba's carrying provisions to David plainly showed Ziba's belief and nope of David's restoration, he must know that if he had charged Mephibosheth falsely, the falsehood must have been discovered when David was resettled on the throne ; and that being convicted of calumniating his mas- ter, he would, in all probability, have been so far from hav- ing Mephibosheth's whole estate confirmed to him, as that he would have lost his maintenance out of it for himself and family. And indeed David himself seems to me not to have been thoroughly satisfied with Mephibosheth's apol- ogy, by the answer he makes him : " "Why speakest thou any more about thy matters ?" Let me hear no more of thy affairs. I will neither regard Ziba's charge, nor your vin- dication ; an answer that evidently carries an air of cold- ness, indifference, and displeasure, and of one who did not choose to make any strict inquiry into Mephibosheth's con- duct, but to admit his excuse, though in itself insuflicient and unsatisfactory; and he therefore only adds : Thoiiand Zibadivide the land. If this be the true state ofthecase, asit appears to me to be, David's annulling the grant to Ziba, so far as to reinstate Mephibosheth in the possession of even half the land, was a noble instance of David's generosity, and of the grateful remembrance he retained of Jonathan's af- fection and friendship for him. But I must question the truth of the account, tl^jit David restored to Mephibosheth but half of the estate. Ziba had been an old servant in Saul's family, who had fifteen sons, and twenty servants. To him David had said : " I have given thy master's son all that pertaineth to Saul, and to all his house. Thou therefore and thy sons and thy servants shall till the land for him, and bring in the fruits, that thy master's son may have food to eat, viz. for his household and family. As foV Mephibosheth himself, he shall always eat at my table, as one of the king's sons." Ziba therefore was to take care of the estate, to account for the profits of it to Mephibosheth, and to be himself and his whole family maintamed out of the annual produce, for his care in cultivating it. This was a proper division of it between Mephibosheth, as lord of the estate, and Ziba as the farmer and manager of it. What now is the determination of David, upon his restora- tion to the throne 1 Mephibosheth had been entirely ousted upon Ziba's complaint ; but after he had made his apology, David said to him : " I have said. Thou and Ziba divide the land." But where and when did David ever say, " I give each of you a moiety of the estate V He first gave the whole in property to Mephibosheth, and afterward to Ziba ; but never divided it, share and share alike, between them. And yet, " I have said. Thou and Ziba divide the land," must refer to some former division of the estate by David's order. But no such determination or order is to be found, but in that original one, in which the estate was divided between Mephibosheth in property, and Ziba as husbandman, for his own and family's maintenance. So that this last determination of David was so far from taking away one half of the estate from Mephibosheth, that it was in reality confirming the original grant, and restoring him to the possession of the whole, upon the same terms on which that possession was originally granted him. So that if David was too hasty in giving away Mephibosheth's estate to Ziba, he was, upon better recollection, as hasty in restoring it to him ; and it ought to be acknowledged as a proof of his inviolable regard to his oath to Jonathan, since he had reason for just suspicion, that his son had been wauling in that affection and fidelity which he owed him, as his generous protector and benefactor. And though by his confirming the original grant, he left Ziba and his fam- ily a maintenance out of the estate, it was not as the reward of his treachery, of which there is no proof, but out of re- spect even to Saul, of whose house Ziba was, and as a recom- pense for his faithful adherence to him in his distresses, and that seasonable and noble supply with which he furnished him and his followers, when he was forced to abandon his rapital, bv the unnatural rebellion of his son Absalom. Hereby David did more than full justice to Mephibosheth, and ^t the samt time rewarded Ziba by continuing him on the estate, upon the former conditions of possessing it. Mr Bayle has a long article on this affair, m which he takes it for granted, that David restored Mephibosheth but one half of the estate, and says, " that some interpreters main- tain, that Ziba's accusation was not unjust ; or, at least, that it was founded on so many probabilities, that it might be credited without passing a wrong judgment ;" but there are but few, says he, of that opinion ; and he affirms, "that David found him a false accuser." But Mr. Bayle offers not a single proof for these assertions, and he who relates the different opinions of others concerning any fact, and de- clares on the unfavourable side of it, without giving his rea- sons for it, doth not act like a candid critic, but with the spirit of partiality and party. I must therefore leave these particulars to the judgment of the more candid and impartial reader, when he hath duly considered what hath been said above in order to obviate them ; agreeing at the same time with him, that if Mephibosheth was unjustly treated, Da- vid's holiness could never make that sentence just, though Pope Gregory hath insisted upon it ; and that to conclude the sentence was just, merely because David passed it, though it was unjust in itself, is to establish a very dangei- ous principle. — Chandler. Ver. 29. And the king said unto him, Why speakest thou any more of thy matters? I have said, Thou and Ziba divide the land. This form of speech is exceedingly common when a man wishes to confirm any thing, or when he wants to give weight to a promise. To show that all will be fulfilled, he says, Ndn-chanrnain-nea, " Oh ! I have said it." — Roberts. CHAPTER XX. Ver. 1. And there happened to be there a man of Belial, whose name was Sheba, the son of Bichri, a Benjamite ; and he blew a trumpet, and said. We have no part in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse : every man to his tents, O Israel. When slaves are liberated from their owners, they say, " We have no pangu, i. e. part, in them, nor they in us," It is also very common to mention the name of the person, and that of his father ; and this sometimes implies disgrace, especially when the family has arisen from obscurity, and therefore to allude to its origin is to insult the descendant>-. 1 — Roberts. | Ver. 1. And there happened to be there a man of Belial, whose name was Sheba, the son of Bichri, a Benjamite ; and he blew a trumpet, and said, We have no part in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse : every man to his tents, O Israel. 2. So every man of Israel went up from after David, and followed Sheba the son of Bichri: but the men of Judah clave unto their king, from Jordan e\'en to Je- rusalem. The blame of this new rebellion hath been charged on David, and he censured for thus inadvertently plunging himself into fresh troubles, by suffering himself to be con- ducted home by a deputation from the tribe of Judah. The learned authors of the Universal History, have made a like observation on this part of David's conduct, and say, that " the partiality, which he showed to his own tribe, in inviting it to come foremost to receive him, raised such a jealousy in the other ten, as ended at length in a new revolt." But where doth the history justify this reflection, that he was partial to his own tribe, in inviting it to come foremost to receive him 1 The truth is, that he did not invite them at all to come and receive him, fill he had been in- formed by expresses from all the other tribes, that the> were universally in motion to restore him, and his message to them only was: " Why are ye the last to bring back the king 1" Not, why are ye not the foremost 1 And though the other tribes complained to that of Judah, " Why did Chap. 20. 2 SAMUEL 227 ye despise us, that our advice should be first had in bring- ing back our king V Yet the tribe of Judah was so far from coming to meet the king, out of any regard to, or contempt of, their brethren, that the very zeal and move- ments of those tribes, in David's favour, was the principal motives urged by him, to bring back the tribe of Judah to their duly, and their great inducement to return to iheir allegiance to him. This was paying a real deference to their judgment, and what they ought to have been pleased with, and highly applauded. It is true, that the tribes all concurred in their resolutions to restore him, and were taking the proper methods to effect it, yet that David continued at Mahanaim, till the deputies from Judah came to him there, with an invitation irom the whole tribe to repair to Jerusalem, and to assure him, that they would receive him in a body at Gilgai, and prepare every thing necessary for his passage over Jordan. Nor could he indeed set out for Jerusalem, till he had received certain information, that the men of Judah, and Amasa, who was in possession of it, would quietly permit him to return to it, without endan- gering his own person, or hazarding the peace of the nation, should he attempt to reduce the city by force. But when he knew the city would open her gates to him, it is no wonder he should resolve immediately to begin his march to it, as he had now nothing to fear from that quarter, and imagined, that as all the tribes had declared for him, the sooner he acted agreeably to their desires, they would be the better pleased, and without the formality of any particu- lar invitations, receive him with open arms, wherever he should meet them. The pretence, that the men of Judah had stolen him away, was unreasonable and unjust. For while he was at Mahanaim, the tribes on that side Jordan all declared for him, and accompanied him to the passage of that river, ana went over with him to join the rest of their brethren, who were come down to meet him ; so that when they were all united at the passage of the river, there were actually present, by large deputations, the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and five others, who waited on him in his march to Gilgai. The truth of the case seems to be, that the deputations from the more distant tribes, not being able to get farther than Gilgai, before the king's arrival there, envied the other tribes, and particularly that of Judah, which had the principal share in providing every thing necessary for the King's passage over Jordan, and laid hold of the first op- portunity to express their resentment against them. This was heightened by the imprudent haughty answer, which the men of Judah made to their expostulation, that they had a peculiar right in the king, as he was near akin to them, because he was of their own tribe ; and seeming to insinuate, that they came voluntarily, but that the other tribes came with an expectation of being provided for at the king's expense, and hoping some donative from him, as the reward of their submission to him. This, I think, is plainly implied, when they told them : " Have we eaten at all at the king's cost 7 Or hath he given us any gift*?" Words which seem to carry a tacit insinuation, that other tribes expected both. This reflection, and the claim of a particular interest in the king, disgusted all the other tribes in general, and disposed them to enter into violent meas- ures to revenge themselves. David, upon the whole, seems to me to be nowise blameable on account of Sheba's revolt, but that it was occasioned by misunderstandings between the tribes themselves, which it was not at that time in his power to prevent. — Chandler. ^ Ver. 3. And David came to his house at Jerusa- iem; and the king- took the ten women his concubines, whom he had left to keep the house, and put them in ward, and fed them, but went not in unto them : so they were shut up ^ unto the day of their death, living in widow- ' hood. In China, when an emperor dies, all his women are removed to an edifice called the Palace of Chastity, situa- ted within the walls of the palace, in which they are shut up for the remainder of their lives. — Burder, Ver 9. And Joab said to Amasa, Art thou in health, my brother? And Joab took Amasa by the beard with the right hand to kiss him. D'Arvieux was present at an Arabian entertainment, to which came all the emirs, a little while after his arrival, accompanied by their friends and attendants : and after the usual civilities, caresses, kissings of the beard, and of th-e hand, which every one gave and received according to his rank and dignity, sat down upon mats. It was in this way, perhaps, that Joab pretended to testify his respect for Amasa, his rival in the favour of the king; he took him by the beard to kiss him, or agreeably to the custom of these emirs, or Arabian chieftains, to kiss the beard itself; and in this stooping posture he could much better see to direct the blow, than if he had only held his beard, and raised him- self to kiss his face; while Amasa, charmed by this high compliment, which was neither suspicious nor unusual, and undoubtedly returning it with corresponding politeness, paid no attention to the sword in the hand of his murderer. it is extremely probable that Judas betrayed his Lord in the same way, by kissing his beard. The evangelists Matthew and Mark say, that he came directly to Jesus, and said, Hail, Master, and kissed him ; but Luke seems to hint, that Judas saluted him with more respect. Jesus, according to Matthew, had time to say, before he received the kiss from Judas, " Friend, wherefore art thou come 1" and while Judas was kissing his beard, Jesus might express himself with great ease and propriety, as Luke relates, "Judas, be- trayest thou the Son of man with a kiss V — Paxton. Ver. 18. Then she spake, saying, They were wont to speak in old time, saying, They shall surely ask counsel at Abel : and so they ended the matter. Intimating, that the city of Abel was very famous, in ancient times, for giving advice, and determining contro- versies. But of this there is no intimation except in this place, and the sense seems very forced and unnatural. I think R. S. Jarchi's exposition leads to the true interpre- tation, which our learned Bishop Patrick seems also to ap- prove ; who observes, that the word nsts^n^ refers, not to old time, but the beginning of the siege. As if she had said, When the people saw thee lay siege to the city, they said, surely they will ask us, if we will have peace, and then we shall soon come to an agreement, and make an end ; put- ting Joab in mind of the rule in the law, Deut. xx. 10, which commands them to ofl!er peace to the cities of other nations, when they came to besiege them, and therefore much more to a city of their own, as Abel was. This agrees well with what follows, that they were a peaceable people, and faithful to their prince, and therefore would not have refused to yield to him upon summons. — Chand- ler. Ver. 23. Now Joab was over all the host of Is- rael : and Benaiah the son of Jehoiada was over the Cherethites and over the Pelethites. This hath occasioned a very severe reflection on David's honour and justice, and he is reproached because Joab was continued in the command, and not a single syllable of any notice taken by David of the murder of Amasa, whom he himself had appointed general ; as though Da- vid had acquiesced in the murder, and confirmed Joab in the command of the army, as the reward of it. But that David greatly resented this murder of Amasa, is evident from his last advice to Solomon, in which he nobly recom- mends, and gives it in charge to him, to do justice on that bloody assassin for the murders of Abner and Amasa. David was not now able himself to do it, and Joab was too powerful a subject to be brought to any account. We have seen that he had insolence enough, after Absalom's death, to threaten the king with a new revolt, if he did not do what he ordered him; and after the assassination of Amasa, he usurped, in defiance of his master's appointment, the com- mand of all the forces. They seem to have had an affec- tion for him as a brave and successful general ; he had just now restored the quiet of the land, by entirely queMing the insurrection under Sheba,and returned to Jerusalem, with- out fear of the king, and in defiance of justice, as general- 228 2 SAMUEL Chap. 2t. issimo of the army ; and continued to assume this rank, not by David's order and inclination, but by his mere - acquiescence in a measure that was contrary to his will, but which he was not able to set aside. It should be ob- served to David's honour, that when the rebellion under Absalom, and the insurrection by Sheba, were entirely sup- pressed, we read of no bloody executions for treason and rebellion. David resolved that no one should be put to death on that account. He was all mercy and forgive- ness. The cursing Shimei was reprieved. The suspected Mephibosheth was restored, and the rebel general constitu- ted captain of the forces of the kingdom. Had he been the Nero or the Turk he hath been figured out by Mr. Bayle and others, this occasion would have abundantly enabled him to gratify his revenge, and satiate himself with blood. Should it be said, that David's clemency was owing to his thinking it hazardous to make examples of any of them ; and his not being able to do it, because the revolt was general; or, to his policy, considering the pre- cariousness of his situation ; the answer is obvious, that neither of these suppositions hath any probability to sup- port it. TliCre could be no possible hazard in executing Shimei, and such others as had been the principal incen- diaries and promoters of the rebellion. This was now totally suppressed, his victorious army at his devotion, and his general ready to support him, and obey him even in the most sanguinary measures, as appears from his conduct in the affair of Uriah ; so that there could be no hazard in his making proper examples of just indignation and ven- geance. David knew this, and said to Abishai : " Do I not know that I am this day king over Israel 1 restored to my power and authority as king 1 and I will execute it at my pleasure." And in truth he could have none to control him m his present situation. The assertion that the revolt was general, is not true in fact, as hath been elsewhere proved. As to David's policy, that it induced him to resolve that no one should be put to death on account of the rebellion, I acknowledge that there might be somewhat in this; but then it could not arise from the precariousness of his situa- tion, of which there is no appearance or proof; for he was restored by the almost unanimous consent of his people; but from the noble policy, which never influences tyrants, but is inspired by benevolence and humanity, that sup- presses the vindictive spirit, and chooses the obedience which arises from affection and esteem, rather than that which flows from fear, and is enforced by severity. Charges of acting from criminal and unworthy motives, without facts to support them, deserve no regaVd from persons of integrity and honour. I shall only further observe, that from Nathan's threatening David, to the suppression of the rebellion under Sheba, by which the punishment, as far as it related personally to David, was accomplished, were, by the marginal chronology of our Bible, thirteen years ; which shows how groundless the observation is that hath been made, as to this melancholy part of David's history, viz. that it would not be easy to select any period of any history more bloody, or abounding in wickedness of more various dies, than that which has been now mentioned. Instances succeed so quick, that the relation of one is scarce conclu- ded, but fresh ones obtrude upon 'our notice. Supposing this observation true, how do the vices of other men, or the misfortunes of his own family, affect David, as a man after God's own heart 1 Or is he the first good man who hath been unhappy in some of his children 1 Or whose affection towards them hath been much more tender and passionate than they deserved '{ Insulting great and good men, and holding them up to public view, as objects of horror and detestation, from those crimes of their family which gave them the greatest anxiety, is what virtue abhors, and is shocking even to humanity. David had in all seventeen sons. Two of them were profligates, and perished by their crimes. As to the rest , they appear to be worthy men, and were employed by David in the principal departments of the administration ; a circumstance that shows he took ^reat care of their education, and that, upon the whole, he was very far from being unhappy in his family. The crimes committed by the two eldest, were Amnon's affair with his half-sister Tamar; Absalom's murder of Amnon for the injury done his sister; hi] impious rebellion against nis lather; and his public incest with his wives, to which Ahifhophel advised and promoted him. These were the wickednesses of various dies complained of, to which may be added, the murder of Absalom by Joab, contrary to the king's express order. These instances, as related in the history, succeed so quick, as that the account of one is scarce concluded, but fresh ones obtrude upon our notice. But then the relation of these things is much quicker than the succession of years in which they happened, and many events intervened between the commission of the one and the other. Between Amnon's rape, and his murder by Absalom, were more than two years. From Absalom s banishment, to his being restored to the king's presence, were more than five years, and from this to his rebellion and death, three or four ; in all eleven or tM-elve years. But are there no instances in history to be found of more numerous crimes, and as various dies, committed within a much shorter period of time 1 Will not our own history furnish us with such an instance 1 — From the year 1483 to 1485, i. e. in less than three years, one man, Richard duke of Gloucester, usurped the crown, actually murdered the king and his brother, both of them his nephews; poisoned his own queen, to make way for an incestuous marriage with his niece, imbrued his hands in the blood of many of the English nobility, was the author of a civil war in the kingdom, and was himself slain in an engagement with the duke of Richmond, afterward Henry VII. I refer the reader for another instance of implicated wickedness, still of a more terrible nature, in Xerxes the Persian emperor, related at large by Dr. Prideaux in his Connexion, v. i. p. 348, &c. and it would be easy to mention several others, both in the Roman and eastern histories, to show the rash- ness of this observation on which I have been remarking^. —Chandler. CHAPTER XXI. Ver. 1. Then there was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year ; and David inquired of the Lord. And the Lord answer- ed, It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, be- cause he slew the Gibeonites. 2. And the king called the Gibeonites, and said unto them ; (now the Gibeonites were not of the children of Is- rael, but of the remnant of the Amorites : and the children of Israel had sworn unto theri ; and Saul sought to slay them in his zeal to tUt children of Israel and Judah ;) 3. Wherefors David said unto the Gibeonites, What shall I do for you ; and wherewith shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord? 4. And the Gibeonites said unto him, We will have no silver nor gold of Saul, nor of his house ; neither for us shalt thou kill any man in Israel. And he said, What you shall say, that will I do for you. We now enter upon a part of David's history and conduct, that hath been thought exceptionable by many persons of good sense and sober minds; and which others have repre- sented as a masterpiece of wickedness, and for which they ,have censured him as the most accomplished hypocrite, and a perjured and profligate villain. It will therefore be necessary more particularly to consider it, I confess, for my own "part, that I think it one of the most unexception- able parts of his behaviour as a king, and an illustrious proof of the generosity of his temper, the regard he paid to his oath to Saul, and the friendship he owed to the memory and family of Jonathan. That the reader may the better |udge of this, I shall give the history just as it i§ recorded in the Old Testament writings. The inhabitants of Gibeon, a large royal city, which, after the division of the country, was yielded to the tribe of Benjamin, were Amorites by birth and nation; and when the Hebrews, under Joshua, invaded the land of Canaan, the Gibeonites hearing what Joshua had done to Jericho and Ai, and fearing for their own safety, fraudulently persuaded the Hebrews to enter into a league with them ; which was solemnly ratified by a public oath, so that they had the national faith for the security of their lives and properties ; for which reason the Chap. 21. SAMUEL. 229 children of Israel, ".nen they came to tnej! cijes, and un- derstood the fraud, aiurmured against the princes, because they had. made a league with them. The princes, to appease them, said to them : " We have sworn unto them by the Lord God of Israel, therefore we may not touch them. We will even let them live, lest wrath be upon us, because of the oath which we sware to them;" and they were accordingly spared, but condemned to servitude, and made hewers of wood, and drawers of water, for the con- gregation, and for the altar of the Lord perpetually, in the place which he should choose ; i. e. wherever the tab- ernacle or ark should reside. But Saul, in his zeal to the children of Israel and Judah, to ingratiate himself with them, under the specious pretence of public spirit, to enrich his servants and soldiers, and to appear warm and active for the public interest, "sought to slay them, and to destroy them from remaining in any of the coasts of Israel," and actually put many of them to death, employing those of his own house or family in the execution. This was a noto- rious violation of the public faith, laid the nation under the guilt of perjury and murder, and subjected them to the dis- pleasure of God, who is the righteous avenger of these national crimes, but seems to have been regarded as an affair of no consequence, or rather acquiesced in as a use- ful and public-spirited measure. God, however, was pleased to make inquisition for the blood which had been thus un- righteously shed, and sent a famine upon the land, which lasted three years, in the third of which, David, moved by 50 extraordinary a calamity, inquired of the Lord the cause of it, and was answered by the oracle, that it was for Saul, and his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeonites. In consequence of this, David sent for son>e of the principal persons who had escaped the massacre, and said to them : ' What shall I do for you, and wherewithal shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord "?" What satismction do you require for the injuries that have been done you, that you may be induced to pray for the prosperity of my people 1 The Gibeonites answered him : " We will have no silver or gold of Saul, nor of his house ; neither for us shalt thou kill any man in Israel." The king then bid them ask what they would have, and promised that he would do it for them. They replied : ' The man that consumed us, and that devised against us, that we should be destroyed from remaining in any of the soasts of Israel ; let seven of his sons be delivered unto us, and we will hang them up unto the Lord in Gibeah of Saul, who was chosen of the Lord." The king immediately replied : " I will give them ;" and in consequence of it, sparing Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, and all the male line of Saul, who had any claim to, or were capable of contending with him for the crown, and disturbing him in the possession of it ; he delivered to them the two bastard sons of Rizpah, Saul's concubine, and the five sons of Micah, his youngest daughter, by Adriel, the son of Bar- zillai, the Meholathite, not one of whom was capable of succeeding Saul, especially while any of the male line, and particularly those by the eldest son, were alive. Now, at this very time, Mephibosheth, Jonathan's eldest son, dwelt m David's family at Jerusalem ; and though lame in his feet, yet he was sound enough to be the father of a son, named Micah, who had a numerous posterity, the descend- ants of whom continued down through many generations. In this account the reader will observe, that what gave rise to this execution in the family of Saul, was a three years' famine. The famine is not denied, . The cause of it, some think, was the preceding intestine commotions. But this is highly improbable ; for there is no intimation or proba- bility, that the civil war continued so long as twelve months, as it was determined by a single battle, and as that battle was certainly fought not long after the rebellion broke out. For David continued in the plain of the wil- derness, where he first retreated, and which was not far distant from Jerusalem, till he was informed what meas- ures Absalom was determined to follow. These were fixed on soon after that rebel's entrance into Jerusalem, and as soon as the affair would admit, put in execution. Nay, so soon was the plan of operations fixed, that Hushai, David's friend, who continued with Absalom at Jerusalem, sent an express to David to acquaint him, that he had defeated the counsel of Ahithophel, but withal to advise him, not to lodge a single night more in the plains, but instantly to pass ovei Jordan, lest he and all his people should be swal- lowed up by a stictig detachment from the rebel army. David immediately hastened to and passed the river, and could have but a few weeks or months to draw together his troops ; for Absalom was soon after him, attacked his father, and his death put an end to the unnatural rebellion. Besides, the country in general must have been free from any great commotions; for, as David retreated beyond Jordan, collected his forces, and fought the rebels in the territories of the tribes on that side the river, the principal commotions must have happened there, and could not much . affect the ten tribes, and occasion a three years' famine throughout that whole country. The natural cause of that famine was the want of the usual rains, and the violent heat and drought of the seasons during that period ; for it is observed ot Rizpah, that as soon as her tw^o sons were put to death, she spread herself a tent upon the rock where they were hung up from the beginning of harvest until water dropped on them out of heaven, i. e. till the rain came, which had been so long withheld, and it thereby appeared that the displeasure of God towards the nation was fully appeased. But though David could account for the natural cause of the famine, yet its long continuance was so unusual and extraordinary an event, as that he thought himself obliged to inquire of the Lord for the reasons of it, that he might prevent, if he could, the further continuance of it, by averting the dis- pleasure of God, of which the famine seemed to be the im- mediate eflfect. Upon his inquiring, he was answered, that it was upon the account of " Saul, and his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeoniles;" after which the historian immediately informs us, that " Saul sought to slay them in his zeal to the children of Israel and Judah ;" and the Gibeonites themselves complained to David, that Saul was the ma4i that " consumed them, and devised against them, that they should be destroyed from remaining in any of the coasts of Israel." And indeed the murder of these poor people was an action suitable to Saul's sanguinary temper ; and if he was bloody enough to put to the sword, without any provocation, a whole city of his own subjects, what should hinder him from endeavouring to exterminate these Amorites out of the land, if he could hereby oblige his own people, by enriching them with their fields and vineyard^', and thereby better establish himself and his family in the kingdom. Samuel indeed is not anywhere said to have charged Saul with any such slaughter. Probably that prophet was dead before this carnage of the Gibgonites hap- pened, and therefore it was no wonder he never charged Saul with it. He lived long enough after Samuel's death to perpetrate this crime, when it would not be in Samuel's power to reproach him with it. If Samuel was alive, it is absolutely certain that he never visited Saul, and so could not reproach him for his barbarity. But to question the fact is to denv the history, which as peremptorily fastens it on Saul, as it does any other fact whatsoever. The deed itself was a perfidious and bloody one ; the destruction of many of the Gibeonites, and a determined purpose wholly to extirpate the remainder of them out of the country, in violation of the public oath and faith that had been given them for their security, without any provocation or for- feiture of life on their part. He cut them off" in cold blood, defenceless and unarmed, though they were serviceable to the nation, and many of them appropriated to the service of God and of his tabernacle, merely for secular and political views, and that he might serve himself, by gratifying some of the tribes among whom they lived, and who wanted to pos- sess themselves of their cities and lands. It is probable his death prevented the full execution of this barbarous pur- pose, which therefore seems to have been begun but a very little while before it, in order to support his declining inte- rest, and ingratiate himself with the children of Israel and Judah ; with Judah particularly, of which tribe David was, and in whose territories some of the Gibeonitish towns were, to whom he thought the expulsion of that people might be agreeable, and so might be a means of retaining that powerful tribe in his interest. The crime therefore Vas enormous in itself, and aggravated with the most heinous circumstances ; and which all civilized nations, almost in all ages, have looked upon with horror, and as highly deserving the divine displeasure and vengeance. Antiphon, one of the principal orators of Greece, pleading for the bringing a murderer to justice, against whom the evidence was not so full as was desired, but the circum- ^32 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 21. bloody house 1 In the beginning of David's reign, his own unsettled condition for seven years and more, when Saul's family disputed the crown with him, and could none of them have been brought to justice by him ; the many neces- sary wars he was afterward engaged in, and perhaps not thinking himself obliged to take notice of Saul's conduct during his reign, or his very tenderness for the family of his predecessor and father-in-law, might all concur to pre- vent any public inquisition into this cruel transaction, or calling any of the offenders to an account for it in the com- mon course of justice. And God permitted things to take their natural course, and not to manifest his displeasure on this account, till it could be done in such a manner, as should make his justice, as the God and king of Israel, more con- spicuous, and the execution of his vengeance more obser- vable and awful, and as should, at the same time, most effectually prevent all future attempts to injure or extirpate that unhappy people. Particular events may for a long while be delayed, and the very delay of them may, in concurrence with the opera- tions of providence, be one means at last of bringing them to pass with greater observation, and more convincing evidence of the interposition of God in bringing them about, as is frequently the case in long-concealed murders. God therefore, in a time of profound peace, when David's gov- ernment was settled, and there was nothing to interrupt the course of justice, punishes the people with a three years' famine, to let them feel his displeasure, to render them solicitous to know the cause of it, and take the proper methods to appease it. So that though no train of inter- vening and unavoidable circumstances can impede the operations of providence, or prevent what God is deter- mined to bring to pass, yet such circumstances may, for a very considerable while, impede the operations of human justice ; nevertheless, how long soever that justice may be delayed, it will certainly at last take place, when God judges it the proper season to execute it, and when such execution shall most effectually demonstrate his inspection, and tend to secure the purposes of his moral providence and government over mankind. It is, I think, more than obscurely intimated, in those words of David to the Gibeonites, " What shall I do for ycu, and wherewithal shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord V that they had loudly exclaimed against the violation of the public faith, and the perfidy and cruelty of Saul and his family, who had destroyed them ; and demanded that some satisfaction should be made them, and had invocated the vengeance of God against their murderers. To demand satisfaction they had a right, as the vindices sanguinis, the avengers of blood, or the near relations of those whom Saul had cut off; and it is probable that they took occasion, from the continuance of the famine for three years, to renew their complaints for the injuries they had suffered, and to desire that justice might be done them. This must greatly embarrass David, as Saul and his sons were killed in battle, and no satisfac- tion possibly could be obtained from them ; and therefore, in order to "know the real cause of the famine, and whe- ther any, or what satisfaction was to be made to the Gibeon- ites, he determined to inquire of the oracle, and govern himself by the directions of it. The answer he received was, that the famine was sent for Saul, for his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeonites. It is true, that the oracular response did not in words dic- tate any act of expiation that was to be made to the Gibeon- ites, but only mentioned the cause of the famine. And the reason is plain, because when it was known that the famine was sent for the slaughter of these poor people by Saul and his bloody house, it was as well known they were to have some justice done them on that bloody family, for the outrages that had been committed on them ; for David knew that, in the ordinary course of justice, the shedding of blood was only to be atoned for by the shedding of his or their blood on whom the murder was chargeable. So that the oracle did really dictate, though not in words, the necessity of an expiation, by pointing out the crime for which the famine was sent. And thus David understood it. when sending for the Gibeonites, he said to them : " What shall I do for you 1 Wherewith shall I make the atone- ment 1" i. e. the atonement for the blood of your people, that hath been unrighteously shed. The Gibeonites replied: " We will have no silver or gold of Saul, neither for us shalt thou kill any man in Israel." No compensation could be made under the law, for wilful murder, by silver and gold: and indeed nothing could have argued a meaner and more sordid disposition in these people, than a demand of money, in satisfaction for the massacre committed on them ; and though the nation might have been, and certainly was. in some respect criminal, for permitting Saul to cut them off, yet, as Saul was the contriver of the mischief, and his fam- ily the immediate agents who destroyed them, they did not desire that any one person in Israel should be put to death on their account, which was an argument of their great moderation and regard to justice. David then bid them name the satisfaction they demanded, and promised that he would give it them, acting herein in obedience to the pro- phet's direction, who, as Josephus rightly observes, ordered him to grant the Gibeonites whatsoever satisfaction they should demand of him. We have something of a like his- tory in Herodotus, who tells us, that after the Pelasgi had murdered their Athenian wives, and the children had by them, they found that their lands became barren, their wives unfruitful, and their flocks failed of their usual in- crease. On this account they sent to the oracle at Delphos, to know by what means they might obtain deliverance from these calamities. The oracle ordered them to give the Athenians whatsoever satisfaction they should demand of them. The Athenians demanded, that they should deliver up their country to them, in the best condition they could. This the Pelasgi promised upon a certain condition, which they thought impossible. However, they were forced in virtue of this promise, many years after, to surrender it to Miltiades, some of them making no resistance to his forces, and those who did, were besieged and taken prisoners. — Chandler. Ver. 5. And they answered the king, The man that consumed us, and that devised against us that we should be destroyed from remaining in any of the coasts of Israel, 6. Let seven men of his sons be delivered unto us, and we will hang them up unto the Lord in Gibeah of Saul, whom the Lord did choose. And the king said, I will give them. It appears by this, that the demand of these seven per- sons, to be put to death, was by order of God, and the sac- rifice that he appointed to be made to the public justice, tc expiate the murders committed by Saul, for they were to be hung up to the Lord ; i. e. in obedience to his will, and to appease his displeasure, because wilful murders are highly offensive to God, and are properly to be expiated by the death of those who have committed them ; in which sense every offender who is guilty of capital offences, ex- piates his guilt by suffering the penalty of death, and there- by becomes a sacrifice to justice, human and divine. It de- serves also to be remarked, that the Gibeonites did not in- tend to exterminate the family of Saul, in revenge for his intention to destroy them out of the coasts of Israel, but only demanded seven of his sons, and left the choice of these seven to David himself, hereby putting it out of their power to sacrifice the male line of Saul to their revenge, and giv- ing David a glorious opportunity to show how religiously he remembered his covenant with his friend Jonathan, and that no policy of state should ever induce him to the viola- tion of it. It appears from hence, that David could not in- stigate the Gibeonites to make this request, that seven of Saul's sons might be delivered to them, that they might kill them, to prevent its being said that he killed them for their sakes, and that the Gibeonites might hereby take the bl^me of their destruction upon themselves, and screen David from being charged with that murder which he himsel/ had contrived, and by them perpetrated. For if the Gibeon- ites had acted with a determined purpose to cut off Saul's family, they would have named their men, and made sure work by a demand of Mephibosheth and his family. Or if David had the same view, he would have prompted the Gibeonites to have asked the delivery of the same persons ; or, when the choice was left to himself, would readily have seized the opportunity of giving up those that he appre- hended it was most for his interest to get rid of Indeed nothing can be a more improbable absurd supposition than Chap. 21. 2 SAMUEL. 233 this of David's instigating the Gibeonites to demand seven of Saul's family to be delivered up to death, as an expia- tion for his having destroyed many of them. Whether there was, or was not, such a massacre of them by Saul, must be universally known to the people of Israel. For :5uch an execution could not have been committed in a corner. If there was not, how could the Gibeonites de- mand satisfaction ] For what could they demand it 1 Or how demand it from the house of Saul, if they, and all the Deople of Israel knew, that Saul and his house had never aujured them^ Or, how could David instigate them to ask satisfaction for a massacre, that he and all his people knew had never been committed on them 1 No man of common sense would openly pretend a reason for an act of cruelty and injustice, which had not the shadow of a reason in it, and which every one must know the absolute falsehood of; and it must have been much less exceptionable to all Da- vid's subjects, had he put Saul's family to death by an act of power, and openly avowed, that he did it to secure him- self and his own family on the throne, than to cut them off by such a barefaced paltry contrivance, which every one must see through, ana which could not diminish the guilt and horror of the fact, but only serve to heighten his own impudence and wickedness, and expose him for his perfi- dy, subornation, and cruelty, to the greater abhorrence of all his people. And indeed it is acknowledged that a more barefaced deceit was never exhibited ; such indeed as could only have been attempted among the poor bigoted Jews. But I would observe, that as this transaction was carried on in an open public manner ; as it was occasioned by a three years' famine ; as the oracular response declared the famine was sent because that Saul and his bloody house had consumed the Gibeonites ; as they demanded Saul's sons for an expiation ; and David delivered them up for an atonement ; stupid as the Jews were, it was too barefaced a deceit to pass even on them ; for if there had been no massacre of the Gibeonites at all, nor a famine of three years' continuance, the oracle would have been convicted of an immediate lie, and could never have persuaded the people into the belief of facts, which they themselves were absolutely certain never existed. If David was so vile as to attempt this deceit, and the Jews so stupid as to be deluded by it, what must the Gibeonites be, who acted in this tragedy by David's instigation, charged Saul with consu- ming and destroying them, and demanded seven of hLs sons as victims'? For what '? Why, for nothing; for destroy- ing and consuming them, when, in reality, they knew that he did not destroy and consume them, and all the nation knew that this charge against Saul was an imposture and a lie, and the demand of his sons for an expiation was the highest villany and impiety. There is, I believe, no man living who can really believe, that either David or the Gib- eonites could be thus designedly, shamelessly, and without inducement wicked, since the Gibeonites were to have neither gold nor silver for the part they acted, and since David might have cut off Saul's family, had it been in his heart to have done it, and assigned reasons for it, that would have carried some appearance of necessity and just- ice. If Saul was in reality guilty of the murder of these Gibeonites, it became the providence of God, who was su- preme king and judge in Israel, to make inquisition for the blood that was shed, and manifest his displeasure against ><;uch a notorious violation of the public faith and honour. Thu,s also will David be fully vindicated from the charge .of instigating the request of the Gibeonites, and they from the iniquitous imputation of concerting with him so extremely childish, but -yvicked a scheme, of cutting off Saul's posterity. It hath been suggested to the dishonour of David, that m consequence of this request of the Gibeonites, which he himself m.ust have instigated, David, not withheld by any motives of gratitude towards the posterity of his unhappy- father-in-law, in direct violation of his oath to Saul at the cave of Engedi, granted it ; sparing only Mephibosheth, who luckily was so unfortunate as to be a cripple, and so much dependant on David, that he had no room for appre- hension from him. He therefore reserved Mephibosneth, in memory of another oath between him and his father, Jonathan ; for he was under obligations by two oaths, and forgot one, and remembered the other. But this charge is contrary to the most express account of the history, and David's conduct in this affair was worthy a man of probity 30 and honour, and consistent with the strictest regard to his oaths both to Saul and Jonathan. That in granting the re- quest to the Gibeonites, he directly violated his oath to Saul at the cave of Engedi ; or cut oflTthe remainder of Saul's family, in defiance of the solemn oath by which he engaged to spare that 'mhappy race, needs no other refutation than the oath itself. Saul asked David to swear by the Lord, " that thou wilt not cut off my seed after me, that thou Avilt not destroy my name out of my father's house." David gave him his oath accordingly. I will not urge here, that had Saul's family committed crimes worthy of death, David's oath would have been no reason against punishing them according to their deserts ; and such punishment, if de- served, had been no breach of his oath. But I shall only observe, that if David did not cut off his seed after him, so as to destroy his name out of his father's house, he did not violate his oath to Saul. Now David did not cut off one single person of Saul's family, whose death had the least tendency to destroy his name out of his father's house. The seed is always reckoned by the males, and not the females of a family, and the name in a father's house could only be preserved by the male descendants. But David gave up only the son's of Saul's concubine, who were not the legal seed of Saul, and those of his eldest daughter, Avho could only keep up Adriel's name, and not Saul's ; and hereby conscientiously observed, without the least violation, his oath to Saul, or need of any mental reservation to help him out. To this it is objected, that if the seed is always reckoned by the males, and not the females, then Jesus Christ could not be the son of David, because he did not descend from David, by the male line, but from the female. But it should be observed, that the son by a daughter is as really the son of the grandfather, as a son in the male succession, and that the only difference is, that the succession in a family is kept by the sons, and not by the females, who by marriage enter into other families, and therefore cannot keep up the names of the families from whence they sprang. Jesus Christ therefore was the son of David, though only so by the mother's side ; and as he was not to keep up David's line according to the flesh, it was expressly predicted of him, by a double prophecy, that he should be of the female line. The one, that he should be the seed of the woman ; the other, that his mother should be a virgin ; so that he could not have been that son of David who was to be the Messiah, and to sit on his throne for ever and ever, had he been Da- vid's son by an earthly father. The same spirit of prophe- cy that declared he should be David's son, as expressly de- clared that he should be so by the mother ; an exception that makes no alteration in the general rule of family successions, which were constantly among the Jews, and almost every nation in the world, in the male line, and not in the female. Nor is it true that he spared only Mephi- bosheth, and that he reserved only one cripple, from whom he could have no apprehensions, and who being the son of Jonathan, gave him the opportunity of making a merit of his gratitude. The history expressly contradicts this as- sertion, for Mephibosheth had a son, whom he called Mi- cah, who was now old enough to have children, and had four sons, from whom descended a numerous posterity. See his line in the following table : — Saul, Jonalh&n, Mephibosheth, or Merib-baaJ, Micah, pitho^, MeJech,Tare», Ab^z, Jehoadah, Alemeth, Zimri, Apmaveth, Moza, Binea, Kapha, Eleasah, Azel, t Azrikam Bocheru, Ishmael, Sheariah, Obadiah, Ilanau. Eshck, Ulam, Jeush, Eliphelet, 150 sons and grandsons. 234 2 SAMUEL. Chap. 21. faithless David, thus to leave Saul only one poor crip- ple ! and who, not withheld by any moti ves of gratitude, and m direct violation of his oath to Saul, did thus wickedly cut off all his seed after him, and wholly destroy his name, out of his father's house ! It appears from what hath been said also, that when it is insinuated that David spared Me- phibosheth, oaly because as a cripple, and dependant on David, he had no room for apprehension from him, it is mere suggestion, and inconsistent with the plainest appear- ance to the contrary. For as this could not be the reason for his saving Mephibosheth's son Micah, and his family, it is not likely he acted from it in sparing Mephibosheth himself, but from a more worthy motive towards both, out )f regard to his oath, and the grateful remembrance he .-ilill preserved of his former obligations to, and friendship Avilh Jonathan, Mephibosheth's father. This the scripture asserts; that the king spared Mephibosheth, the son of Saul, because of the Lord's oath that was between them, between David and Jonathan the son of Saul. 1 have one remark more to make on this part of the his- tory, which turns out to David's immortal honour. It is observed, that some certain contemplations, which are put into David's head, calling to his remembrance, that some of Saul's family were yet living, be cdljcluded it expedient to cut them off, lest they should hereafter prove thorns in his side ; and then whenever David projected any scheme, a religious pretence, and the assistance of the priests, were never wanting. But for this charge there is not any found- ation. For Saul's bastard children, and the children by his daughter, could never be thorns in David's side, any more than other people, or the other branches of Saul's family, because incapable of the crown ; especially, while there continued a lineal descent in the male line from Saul himself David therefore could not be guilty of all this villany and folly with which he hath been charged, for the sake of cutting off Saul's family, lest they should be thorns in his side, because he cut off none but those who could be no thorns in his side, and suffered all those to live, who alone were capable of proving thorns in his side ; and therefore David projected no such scheme as this of cutting off Saul's family ; yea, his conduct in this affair was di- rectly the reverse of what he must have done had he pro- jected any such scheme ; and therefore I must conclude, tliat as no such scheme was ever projected, there was, and could be, no occasion for a religious pretence, or tlie assist- ance of the priests, to sanctify and accomplish it. There have been, I acknowledge, commotions excited in states by illegitimate children, and by descendants in the female line. But I know of no instance, in ancient or modern history, of any prince, who remembering that some of his predie- cessor's family, who might dispute with him his crouTi by their descent, were living, and concluding it expedient to cut them'off, lest they should hereafter prove thorns in his side, should, to answer this end, cut off only the bastard children, and those of the daughters, and leave the son and grandson of his predecessor alive to propagate their de- scendants, and in them claimants to his crown, and thorns in his side, to all generations. Suspicious and jealous ty- rants love to make surer work ; but David, under a neces- sity of delivering up some of his predecessor's family to justice, generously preserved the claimants to his crown alive, and delivered up those only from whom he could have nothing to fear, as having no kind of legal right to the government and kingdom. Illustrious prince ! Be thy name and memory ever re- vered, thy generosity ever spoken of with praise ; who, when forced by providence to give up to justice some of the guilty family of thy persecutor and sworn enemy, didst from the greatness of thy mind, thy prevailing humanity, thy regard to thy oath to one who sought thy life, and thy pleasing remembrance of thy once loved friend; refuse to ciit off the seed of him that persecuted thee, and to destroy his name out of his father's house, but didst nourish his seed in thy bosom, maintain it in thy family, suffer it to increase and prosper, and spread itself out into numerous branches, even when policy might have dictated other measures, and a wicked craft would certainly have pursued them. Fresh be thy ^aurels to the latest posterity, and thine unexampled generosity ever be remembered with the veneration aud es- 1 teem, which it claims from all the benevolent and virtuous part of mankind. It should be further mentioned, on this ocp-asion, to David's honour, that though he was necessitated to deliver up some of Saul's family to justice, to give satis- faction to the injured Gibeonites, yet that he took the first opportunity to pay the last tokens of respect that could be to Saul and his imhappy family. For as soon as ever it- appeared, that the natural cause of the famine was over, by the return of the rains, David ordered the bones of Saul and Jonathan to be fetched from the men of Jabesh-gilead, who had recovered them from the Philistines, and took them, together with the bones of those that had been hanged up, and buried them honourably in the sepulchre of Kish, Saul's father ; whereby he showed, that he had no inveter- ate enmity to Saul's family, but was pleased with the op- portunity of showing respect to his name and memory. This whole account concludes with this observation of the , historian : " They performed all that the king commanded, and after that God was entreated for the land." God ap- proved his generosity to the family and remains of his enemy, and as the reward of it, sent prosperity to him and his people. — Chandler. Ver. 10. And Rizpah the daughter of Aiah took sackcloth, and spread it for her upon the rock, from the beginning of harvest until water drop- ped upon them out of heaven, and sufiered neither the birds of the air to rest on them by- day, nor the beasts of the field by night. Speaking of a great precipice near Bylan, Mr. Parsons says*" three loaded camels fell down the precipice, and were killed on the spot, in my remembrance ; and what is very remarkable, in less than thirty hours after their loads were taken off, there was not left a piece of flesh, but all was devoured by the vultures in the dav, and the beasts oi prey, mostly jackals, in the night."— Burder. By a passage of La Roque, it appears, that if the usual rains have failed in the spring, it is of great benefit to have a copious shower, though very late: for he tells us, that when he arrived at Sidon, in the end of June, it had not rained there for many months, and that the earth was so extremely dry, that the cotton plants,' and the mulberry- trees, which make the principal riches of that country, were in a sad condition, and all other thjngs suffered in proportion, so that a famine was feared, which is generally followed with a pestilence. He then tells us, that all the sects of religion which lived there had, in their various ways, put up public prayers for rain, and that at length on the very day that the Mohammedans made a solemn pro- cession out of the city, in the way of supplicating for mer- cy, all on a sudden the air thickened, and all the marks ol an approaching storm appeared, and the rain descended in such abundance, that all those that attended the procession got back to the city with considerable difiiculty, and in dis- order. He adds, "that the rain continued all that day, and part of the night, which perfected the revival of the plants, and the saving of the productions of the earth. La Roque is evidently embarrassed with this fall of the rain just at the time the Mohammedans were presenting ~ their supplications, when neither the solemn prayers of the Greek bishop, nor those of the Latin monks, nor even the exposing of the Host for many days, had been thus hon- oured : " At last," said he, " Heaven," which bestows its fa- vours, when and how it pleases, and who causes it to rain on the unjust and the infidel, permitted so great an abun- dance of rain to fall," (fee. But there certainly was no ocr casion for any such disquietude ; there was no dispute which religion was most excellent involved in this transaction, nor does any thing more appear in it than this, that God, the universal parent, having at length been sought to by all, showered down his mercies upon all. But the intention of these papers leads me to remarks of a different kind. This author does not tell us when this rain fell, which is to be regretted, and the more so, as he is often exact in less im- portant matters. However, it could not be before the end of June, N. S. for he did not arrive at Sidon imtil then; and it could not be so late as the usual time of the descent of the autumnal rains, for the cotton is ripe in September, un- til the middle of which month those rains seldom fall, often later, and this rain is supposed to have been of great service to the growing cotton ; consequently, these general prayers for rain could not refertoautumnal showers, but a late spring rain, which probably happened soon after his arrival, or Chap. 22. 2 SAMUEL. 23# about the time that Dr. Russel tells us those severe Ihun- dershowers fell at Aleppo, which I have before taken no- tice of, that is, about the beginning of July, O. S. And though the harvest must have been over at Sidon by the time this gentleman arrived there, and they had, therefore, nothing then to hope or to fear for as to that, yet as the people of those countries depend so much on garden stuff, the in,spissated juice of grapes, figs, olives, &c. they might be apprehensive of a scarcity as to these too, which they might hope to prevent by this late rain. For the like rea- son, such a rain must have been extremely acceptable in the days of David. And it must have been more so, if it <*ame a good deal earlier, though we must believe it to have jeen after all expectations of it in the common way were over ; and such a one, I suppose, was granted. Dr. Dela- ny indeed, in his life of David, tells us, that the Rabbins suppose the descendants of Saul hanged from March, from the first days of the barley-harvest, to the following Octo- ber, and he seems to approve their sentiments. Dr. Shaw mentions this affair only cursorily ; however, he appears to have imagined that they hanged until the rainy season came in course. But surely we may much better suppose it was such a rain as La Roque speaks of, or one rather earlier. The ground Delany goes upon is a supposition, that the bodies that were hanged up before the Lord, hung until the flesh was wasted from the bones, which he thinks is affirmed in the 13th verse of that chapter; but, I must confess, no such thing appears to be affirmed there; the bodies of Saul and his sons, it is certain, hanged but a very little while on the wall of Beihshan before the men of Ja- besh-gilead removed them, which yet are called bones ;— " They took their bones and buried them," 1 Sam. xxxi. 13 ; the seven sons of Saul then might hang a very little time in the days of King David. And if it should be imagined that the flesh of Saul was consumed by fire, verse 12, and so the word bones came to be used in the account of their interment, can any reason be assigned why we should not suppose these bodies were treated afler the same manner 1 But it appears that the word bo7ies frequently means the same thing with corpse, which circumstance also totally in- validates this way of reasoning : so the embalmed body of Joseph is called his bones, Gen. 1. 25, 26, and Exod. xiii."l9 ; so the lying prophet terms his body, just become breathless, his bones: " when I am dead, then bury me in the sepul- chre wherein the man of God is buried, lay my bones be- side his bones," 1 Kings xiii. 31. So Josephus tells us that Simon removed the bones of his brother Jonathan the high- priest, who was slain by Tryphon when he was departing out of that country, though Simon seems to have removed the body as soon as might be afler Tryphon's retirement. Such a late spring rain would have been attended, as the rain at Sidon was, with many advantages ; and coming af- ter all hope of common rain was over, and presently fol- lowing the death of these persons on the other hand, would be a much more merciful management of Providence, and a much nobler proof that the execution was the appoint- ment of God, and not a political stratagem of David, than the passing of six months over without any rain at all, and then its falling only in the common track of things. This explanation also throws light on the closing part of this story, " And after that God was entreated for the land." Dr. Delany seems to suppose that the performing these funeral rites was requisite to the appeasing God: but could that be the meaning of the clause 1 Were the ignominy of a death the law of Moses pronounced accursed, and the honour of a royal funeral, both necessary mediums of appeasing the Almighty 1 Is it not a much easier interpretation of this clause, The rain that dropped on these bodies was a great mercy to the country, and the return of the rains in due quantities afterward, in their season, proved that God had been entreated for the land '?— Harmer. Ver. 12. And David went and took the bones of Saul, and the bones of Jonathan his son, from the men of Jabesh-g-ilead, which had stolen them from the streets of Beth-shan, where the Ptiilistines had hano-ed them, when the Phi- listines had slain Saul in Gilboa. ^"Beth-shan." Calmet says on this, "House, or temple w the tooth, or of ivory ; from (no) beth, a Muse, and (jv) shen, a tooth. This title means, no doubt, simply the tem- ple of the tooth, but we have no reason to conclude that a TOOTH only was worshipped in any temple in Canaan ; it must have been the symbol of some deity." Calmet then proceeds to show that this may have been the god Gjniesa of the East, who is represented w^h an elephant's head, and supposes the tusks are alluded to by the tooth. I am not aware, however, of any such distinction being maae in that deity, and think it unlikely that his tusk would give the name to a temple. Is it not a curious fact, that the tooth of Buddha is the most sacred and precious relic, in the opinion of the inhabitants of Siam, of the Burm?n em- pire, and of Ceylon? That tooth is kept in the temple of Kandy, the capital of Ceylon. Buddhism is the religion of China, and of those countries alluded to, and it was for- merly the religion of multitudes in India. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXII. Ver. 6. The sorrows of hell compassed me about; the snares of death prevented me. This is an allusion to the ancient manner of hunting, which is still practised in some countries, and was perform- ed by surrounding a considerable tract of ground by a circle of nets, and afterward contracting the circle by de- grees, till they had forced all the beasts of that quarter to- gether into a narrow compass, and then it v/as that the slaughter began. This manner of hunting was n.scd in Ita- ly of old, as well as all over the eastern parts of the -world, and it was from this custom that the poets som.etimes repre- sented death as surrounding persons with her necs, ana as encompassing them on every side.— Burder. Ver. 35. He teacheth my hands to war ; so that a bow of steel is broken by mine arms. The bow is the first weapon mentioned in the holy scrip- tures, and seems to have been quite familiar to the imme- diate descendants of Abraham. " Take," said Isaac, "thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and take me some venison. Here indeed the reference is to hunting; but we learn from the remark of Jacob to his favourite son, that the weapon which was found so useful in his art, was soon turned against our species ; and it still continues to maintain its place in some countries, among the instruments of human destruction. We learn from Homer, that the Grecian bow was at first made of horn, and tipped with gold. But th^ material oi which it was fabricated, seems for the most part to have been wood, which the workman frequently adorned with gold and silver. One of these ornamented weapons pro- cured for Apollo, a celebrated Cretan, the significant name of ApyvpoTo^og, the bearer of the silver-studded bow. But the Asiatic warrior often used a bow of steel or brass, which, on account of its great stiffness, he bent with his foot. Those that were made of horn or wood probably required to be bent in the same way ; for the Hebrew always speaks of treading his bow, when he makes ready for the battle : and to tread and bend the bow are in all the writings of the Old Testament convertible phrases. The bow of steel is distinctly mentioned by the Hebrew bard : " He teaches my hand to war, so that a bow of steel is broken by mine arms." This was a proof of great strength, and of uncom- mon success in "war, which he ascribes with equal piety and gratitude to the infinite power and goodness of Jehovah. To bend the bow, was frequently proposed as a trial of strength. Afler Ulysses had bent his bow, which all the suiters of Penelope had tried in vain, he boasted to his son Telemachus of the deed, because it was an undenia- ble proof that he had not lost his ancient vigour, in which he was accustomed to glory. Herodotus relates, that when Cambyses sent his spies into the territories of Ethiopia, the king of that country, -well understanding the design of their visit, thus addressed them ; When the Persians can easily draw bows of this largeness, then let them invade the Ethiopians. He then unstrung the bow, and gave it to them to carry to their master. The Persians themselves, according to Xenophon, carried bows three cubits m length. If these were made of steel or brass, which are both men- tioned* in the sacred volume, and of a thickness propor- tioned to their length, they must have been very dangerous weapons even in close fight; and as such they are repre- sented by the prophet Isaiah; " Their bows also shall aasU 236 2 SAMUEL. Chaf. 22-^U, the young men in pieces; and they shall have no pity on ihe fruit of the womb ; their eyes shall not spare children." In time of peace, or when not engaged with the enemy, the oriental warriors carried their bow in a case, sometimes of cloth, but more commonly of leather, hung to their girdles. When It was taken from the case, it was said, in the lan- guage of Habakkuk, to'be " made quite naked." — Paxton. Ver. 41. Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies, that I might destroy them that hate me. The neck is often used for the whole body, and in threat- enings, it is the part mentioned. A proprietor of slaves is said to have their necks. To a person going among wicked or cruel people it is said, " Go not there, your puddara, i. e. neck, or nape, will be given to them," " De- pend upon it, government will have it out of the necks of those smugglers." " Have you paid Chinnan the money V " No, nor will I pay him." "Whyl" "Because he has had it out of my neck." When two men have been fight- ing, the conqueror may be seen to seize the vanquished by the neck, and thrust him to the ground. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXIII. Ver. 16. And the three mighty men brake through the host of .the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Beth-lehem, that was by the gate, and took it, and brought it to David : never- theless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto the Lord. There is an account very similiar to this in Arrian's Life of Alexander. Tunc poculo pleno, sicut oblatum est Feddito : non solus, inquit bibere sustineo, nee tam exi- guum devidere omnibus possum. " When his army was greatly oppressed with heat and thirst, a soldier brought him a cup of water ; he ordered it to be carried back, say- ing, I cannot bear to drink alone, while so many are in want: and this cup is too small to be divided among the whole. Give it to the children for whom you brought it," — BURDER. CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 1. And again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah. Here arises the question, If Moses presupposed the law- fulness of this measure, and did actually twice number the people, wherein consisted David's sin when he did the same 1 Yet the Bible says that he actually did sin in this matter, and was punished for it by God, with a pestilence, which lessened the sum of the people numbered, by 70,000. The history of this event is given in 2 Sam. xxiv. and 1 Chron. xxi. ; and these passages I must beg the reader to peruse, if he wishes to understand what follows. The common opinion is, that David offended God by his pride, and his desire to gratify it, by knowing over how many subjects he was king. This is, perhaps, the worst expla- nation that can be given of the unlawfulness of his order. Were God to punish by pestilence every ambitious motion in the hearts of kings, and every sin they commit in thought, pestilences would never cease. It must, besides, appear yery strange indeed, how such a man as Joab should have expressed so great an abhorrence at a sin that consisted merely in pride of heart, and have so earnestly dissuaded David from it. Yet he thus remonstrates with him, say- ing, " May God multiply the people a hundred-fold, that the king may see it ; but wherefore will the king urge this measure'?" Or, as we read in Chronicles, "May God piultiply the people a hundred-fold! They are entirely devoted to the king's service. But whyseeketh the king to do this 1 and why should guilt be brought upon Israel ?" Notwithstanding this remonstrance, however, the king, we are told by both historians, repeated his commai^d with fo much rigour, that Joab found it necessary to carry it into execution. Now Joab was not, on other occasions, a man pf narrow conscience. He had already deliberately plan- ned, and, in cold blood, perpetrated, two murders, merely to rid himself of rivals. And when David gave him the hint to place Uriah in the post of danger, he was by no means squeamish, but immediately planned and com- menced an attack, in which, besides Uriah, a great num- ber of his bravest soldiers were slain. His conscience, therefore, could not be incommoded by a mandate relative to a matter in itself lawful, and where the sin, in whatever it consisted, lay altogether hid in the king's ambitious heart. If we think so, we must look upon him m the light of a court-chaplain, and a semi-pietist ; and he certainly was neither. What he hesitated, therefore, about doing, must have appeared in his own eyes, something more serious than bare murder. Josephus, however, has hit upon an idea, which may, by some, be thought to account some- what more probably, than the opinion now mentioned, for the guilt which David is said to have incurred on this oc- casion. " David," says he, " made the people be numbered, without exacting for the sanctuary, the half-shekel of poll- tax enjoined by the Mosaic law." But this idea loses all its weight, if I am right in my opinion, that Moses enjoined the exaction of the half-shekel, not upon every occasion of a census, but merely on the first; and even allowing me to be wrong in this, and the common exposition of the statute, in the time of Josephus, to be the more correct one, still the notion of Josephus is certainly inadmissible here. For neither in Samuel nor Chronicles do we find the least men- tion of the half-shekel ; nor does David forbid the payment of it, but only orders the people to be numbered ; so that every conscientious person had it in his power to pay it of himself, and the hign-priest to demand it in virtue of his office. At any rate, David's census appears, in this re- spect, altogether as blameless as Moses^ second one, in the account of which (Numb, xxvi.) not a word is said con- cerning the poll-tax. Nor do Joab and the other generals here represent to the king, that he ought to order the pay- ment of the half-shekel, but only intreat him to desist from the census itself. And finally, David, who had amassed so many millions of shekels, (1 Chron. xxix.) and, to the man- ifest prejudice of his own family, destined so much for building a temple, must actually have been in the delirium of a hot fever, if, contrary to all his other views, he had not had a desire to grant for the future erection of that edifice, projected by himself, the half-shekel payable on the census, which was a mere trifle compared to his own donations, and came not out of his own purse. But as far as I can understand the story, David caused the people to be numbered, neither out of that prudent solicitude which wiM always actuate a good king, nor yet out of mere curiosity, but that by means of such a census they might be enrolled for permajient military service, and to form a standing army ; the many successful wars he had already carried on, having filled his mind with the spirit of conquest. We find at least, that the enumeration was ordered to be carried on, not as had before been usual, by the priests, but by Joab and the other generals ; and the very term here used, Safar, (■\£r) nuraeravii, scripsit, in- cludes also in itself the idea of numbering for military service, and is, without any addition, equivalent to our German military term, enrolliren, to enrol, or muster. This, indeed, is so much the case, that Hassofer, (iccn) the scribe, is that general who keeps the muster-rolls, and marks those called on to serve. In like manner, the of- ficers are termed (cniso) scribes. David's sin, therefore, or rather (not to speak so theologically, but more in the language of politics) his injustice and tyranny towards a people who had subjected themselves to him on very dif- ferent terms, and with the reservation of many liberties consisted in this. Hitherto, the ancient and natural rule of nations, Quot cives, tot milites, had certainly been so far valid, as that, in cases of necessity, every citizen was obliged to bear arms in defence of the state. Such emer- gences, however, occurred but very rarely; and at other times every Israelite was not obliged to become a soldier, and in peace, for instance, or even during a war not very urgent, subject himself to military discipline. David had made a regulation, that, exclusive of his lifeguards, calleii in the Bible, Creti and Pleti, 24,000 men should be»on duty every month by turns ; so that there were always 288.000 trained to arms" within the year; which was certainly suf- ficient for the defence of the coimtry, and for commanding respect fronv the neijjhbouring nations, especially consid- Chap. 24. 2 SAMUEL. 2374 ering the state of the times, and the advantages in point of situation, which David's dominions enjoyed. It would ap- pear, however, that he did not think this enough. Agitated, m all probability, by the desire of conquest, he aspired at the establishment of a military government, such as was that of Rome in after-times, and at subjecting, with that view, the whole people to martial regulations; that so every man might be duly enrolled to serve under such and such generals and officers, and be obliged to perform military duty at stated periods, in order to acquire the use of arms. Whether such a measure, if not absolutely necessary to the preservation of the state, be a hardship on the people, every man may judge from his own feelings, or even from the most recent history of certain nations. For even in a country where the government is purely monarchical, and the people extremely martial, and the frontiers of which, from the uncompactness of its territories, are not, like those of the Israelitish empire, surrounded and secured by moun- . tains or deserts, the enrolment of every individual for mil- itary service, introduced 40 years ago, has been of late spontaneously abolished by a very warlike sovereign, be- cause he found that it was too oppressive, and furnished a pretext for a multitude of extortions. Now if this was Da- vid's object, it is easy to conceive, that Joab, although in Srivate life a very bad character, and twice guilty of mur- er, might yet have as much patriotism, or rather political sagacity, as to deprecate, in the most energetic terms, the execution of a royal mandate, the effect of which would have been to bring a free people under the worst military despotism. Very bad consequences were to be apprehend- ed, if the subjects should not prove sufficiently patient to submit to such an innovation. The army, however, devo- ted as it was to David, and approved as was its valour in mnny campaigns, may, perhaps, have effected their patient submission ; and, in fact, the expression, (2 Sam. xxiv. 5,) And they, viz. Joab, and the other generals to whom the task was committed, encamped rear Aroer, appears to insin- uate, that this enumeration, or rather this enrolment of the people, required the support of a military force. What David intended, Uzziah, his successor, in the eighth generation, may perhaps have accomplished. The martial measures of that prince ( 2 Chron. xxvi. 11 — 14^ are not commended; the prophet Isaiah (chap. ii. 5 — 8) seems rather to describe them in the language of censure; It is to be observed, however, that the enrolment of the whole people by David, and by Uzziah, is by no means one and the same thing. The former ruled over a powerful nation, wherein there were nearly a million and a half of people able to bear. arms, and which had a compact and secure frontier, from the Euphrates to the Mediterranean : so that, for the safety of the state, no such oppressive meas- ure was requisite. But Uzziah had under him only two tribes, consisting proKnbly of about 300,000 men, and his territories were not rounded, nor the frontiers distinct and strong. Here, therefore, that measure might be necessary for self-defence, or, at any rate, admit of a sufficient apolo- gy, which, in David's time, was quite needless, and if strictly enforced, must have proved absolutely tyrannical. MiCHAELIS. From several passages in the Old Testament, compared with each other, it appears that this census, or numbering of the people, was a sacred action ; as the money was to be applied to the service of the temple. It was not like that in other nations, to know the strength of the government ; for God was their king in a peculiar manner, and promised to protect them from all their enemies, and to multiply them as the stars of the sky, while they obeyed his laws. — Da- vid's crime, therefore, seems to have lain in converting a sacred action to a civil purpose. He was culpable both in the thing itself, and in the manner of doing it. For where- as by the rule given to Moses, in the passages referred to above, they were to number the males from twenty years old and upward; David gave orders, that all should be numbered, who were fit for war, though under that age. This must haA^e been highly criminal in David, now in his old age, after so many instances of the Divine favour ex- pressed towards him. And as to the people, their offence seems to have consisted in their compliance with that order. He was culpable in giving the order, and they in obeying it. And therefore Joab, who was sensible of this, and unwil- ling to execute the command, asks David, " Why he would be the cause of trespass in Israel ?" For by that means, he reduced them to the difficulty of disobeying God, or him- self, as their prince. It was" doubtless "their duty to have obeyed God; but we find, as it generally happens in such cases, that the majority, at least, chose to obey the king. However, it appears that Joab was weary of the office, and did not go through it. Probably he might find many of the people uneasy, and averse to submit to the order. Besides, it was expressly enjoined, that when the people were to be numbered from twenty years old and upward, the Levites should be excepted, as being appointed for the service of the tabernacle. And as they were not called out to war, so they had no share in the land of Canaan allotted to them, when it was conquered by the other tribes; who were therefore ordered to give them a number of cities, each tribe out of their portion, which was accordingly done. And Josephus assigns that reason for it, when he says : — " Moses, because the tribe of Levi were exempted from war and expeditions, being devoted to the service of God, lest being needy and destitute of the necessaries of life, they should neglect the care of their sacred function ; ordered the Hebrews, that when by the will of God they possessed the land of Canaan, they'sho\ild give to the Levites forty- eight large and handsome cities, with two thousand cubits of land round the walls." But David seems to have order- ed them likewise to be mustered, with a military view; which, perhaps, was an aggravation. For, it is said, that when Joab, by his command, numbered the people, " they were eleven himdred thousand men that drew sword." And it is added: **But Levi and Benjamin counted he not among them, for the king's word was abominable to Joab." So that it looks as if his orders were to count them with the rest. Indeed, we find them once armed upon an extraordi- nary occasion, which was to guard the temple at the coro- nation of Joash, king of Judah. For, at that time, they were ordered " to encompass the king round about, every man with his weapons in his hand." But that was in the temple, where the rest of the people were not permitted to enter. And besides their religious function, they were sometimes employed in other civil otfices. So David, when he was making preparations for building the temple, ap- pointed six thousand of them for officers and judges. Gro- tius, indeed, observes, with regard to this fact of David, that he declared the people innocent : which he seems to have concluded from what David says, 1 Chron. xxi. 17. But it does not appear, from what has been said above, that they were altogether blameless, though not equally crimi- nal with himself. And in such a case, the equity of a na- tional punishment is acknowledged both by Philo and Josephus, in the passages cited from them by Grotius.— ChITICA BiBLlCA. i| These wars being thtts happily ended, David enjoyed for some time a settled- peace and prosperity, without any foreign invasions to call him into the field, or domestic troubles to interrupt him in the affairs of government ; but being at length persuaded and prevailed on to number the people, he became the cause of trespass to Israel, and brought on them the severe punishment of a pestilence. The author of the books of Samuel, in relating this affair, says : " That the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel," and he moved David against them to say, "Go, number Israel and Judah." The author of the Chronicles differently expresses it. '* And Satan stood up against Is- rael, and provoked David to number Israel ;" and this is objected against as an absurd thing, that David should be said to be moved both by God and Satan to number the people. But I apprehend this difficulty may be easily re- moved, by observing, that these two places are capable of a more favourable turn, so as to render them perfectly recon- cileable with each other, according to the genius of the language, and the common forms of expression in it. The text in Samuel may be thus rendered: "And again the anger of the Lord was' kindled against Israel ; for he moved David," or " David was moved against them to say. Go, number Israel and Judah ;" active verbs in the third person, being frequently to be rendered as impersonals, and not to be referred to the nouns immediately foregoing; and thus the text will be fully reconcileable with that in Chronicles, which says, that " Satan moved him to number the people." Or, it may reasonably be supposed, as the original words we render, " He moved David against them," are the same in Samuel and the Chronicles, that the wo"d Satan hath 2 SAMUEL. Chaf. 22— £4. the young men in pieces; and they shall have no pity on ihe fruit of the womb ; their eyes shall not spare children." In time of peace, or when not engaged with the enemy, the oriental warriors carried their bow in a case, sometimes of cloth, but more commonly of leather, hung to their girdles. When It was taken from the case, it was said, in the lan- guage of Habakkuk, to'^be " made quite naked." — Paxton. Ver. 41. Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies, that I might destroy them that hate me. The neck is often used for the whole body, and in threat- enings, it is the part mentioned. A proprietor of slaves is said to have their necks. To a person going among wicked or cruel people it is said, " Go not there, your friiddara, i. e. neck, or nape, will be given to them." " De- pend upon it, government will have it out of the necks of those smugglers." " Have you paid Chinnan the money V " No, nor will I pay him." " Why V " Because he has had it out of my neck." When two men have been fight- ing, the conqueror may be seen to seize the vanquished by the neck, and thrust him to the ground. — Roberts. CHAPTER XXIII. Ver. 1 6. And the three mighty men brake through the host of .the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Beth-lehem, that was by the gate, and took it, and brought it to David : never- theless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto the Lord. There is an account very similiar to this in Arrian's Life of Alexander. Tunc poculo pleno, sicut oblatum est wadito : non solus, inquit bibere sustineo, nee tam exi- guum devidere omnibus possum. " When his army was freatly oppressed with heat and thirst, a soldier brought im a cup of water ; he ordered it to be carried back, say- ing, I cannot bear to drink alone, while so many are in want: and this cup is too small to be divided among the whole. Give it to the children for whom you brought it," — BURDER. CHAPTER XXIV. Ver. 1. And again the anger of the Lord was kindle'd against Israel, and he moved Uavid against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah, Here arises the question. If Moses presupposed the law- fulness of this measure, and did actually twice number the people, wherein consisted David's sin when he did the same ^ Yet the Bible says that he actually did sin in this matter, and was punished for it by God, with a pestilence, which lessened the sum of the people numbered, by 70,000. The history of this event is given in 2 Sam. xxiv. and I Chron. xxi. ; and these passages I must beg the reader to peruse, if he wishes to understand what follows. The v, a true shepherd of the peo- ple, devoting himself and family as a sacrifice to God for the salvation of his subjects. Besides, in this case, the people were themselves very culpable ; for the command was absolute : " When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel, then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul." And therefore, as they knew or might have known, that, upon being numbered, they were to pay the prescribed ransom, which yet they neglected or refused to do ; as partners in the offence, they justly shared in the penalty inflicted. It is allowed, that the tax was not at this time demanded by David ; and this was his sin, in setting aside a positive command of God, to gratify his own vanity and pride. The demanding this tax by his own authority might have created a national dis- turbance, and therefore should have prevented him from numbering his people. But they submitted to be numbered, and they were therefore bound to pay the tax, whether Da- I vid demanded it of them or not, for the law did not exempt j them from the payment, if he who numbered them did I not demand it. They were to pay it as a ransom for their j lives, and to exempt themselves from the plague ; and were therefore punished with a plague for their neglect and dis- obedience. David indeed takes the guilt upon himself, and declares his people innocent of it : " As for these sheep, what have they done 1" And it is true, that the order to number the people was David's, of which his people were wholly innocent. But they should have remonstrated against the thing, or voluntarily paid the capitation tax required of them ; and as they did neither, David was, as Joab foretold him, a cause of "trespass to Israel, and they could not plead innocence, as a reason for their exemption from punishment. And even supposing they were entirely free from all blame in this affair, were they so far entirely free from all other transgressions, as that it was injustice in God to visit them by a pestilence 1 If not, God did them ( no injustice by sending that pestilence ; and therefore not j by sending it at that time, and as an immediate punishment of David's sin. God, by virtue of his supreme authority over mankind, may resume life whenever he pleases. If there be no sin, the resumption of life will be no punish- ment; if there be, the resumption of it Avill not be unjust, though the immediate reason of that resumption may be for the punishment of another ; especially, as all such in- stances have a real tendency to promote the public good, and to preserve alive, in the minds both of princes and people, that reverence for Deity, without which neither public nor private virtue can subsist, nor the prosperity of kingdoms ever be secured and established upon solid and lasting foundations. Upon this solemn humiliation of David, and intercession with God for his people, the prophet Gad was sent to him the same day, with an order that he should rear up an altar unto the Lord, in the thrashing-floor of Araunah the Jebusite, the hill where Solomon's temple was afterward built. Da- vid accordingly purchased the ground, built an altar unto the Lord, offered burnt-offerings and peace-offerings, where- by the Lord was entreated for the land, and the plague, which had raged from Dan to Beersheba, was staye(tfrom Israel, the city of Jerusalem being mercifully spared, and exempted from this dreadful calamily. After this, David, encouraged by the gracious token God had given him of his acceptance at this thrashing-floor of Araunah, by the fire from heaven that consumed his burnt-offering, continued to offer upon the altar he had erected in this place ; and publicly declared, " This is the house of the Lord God, this is the altar of the burnt-offering for Israel ;" hereby conse- crating this place for the erection of the temple, and to be the seat and centre of the public worship for all the tribes of Israel. On the whole, if they who object, credit the history of the Old Testament in this part of it, and think it true, that one of these three plagues was offered to David, as the punishment of his offence; that he chose the pesti- lence, that it came accordingly, and was removed upon David's intercession ; they are as much concerned to ac- count for the difficulties of the affair, as I or any other person can be. If they do not believe this part of the histo- ry, as the sacred writings represent it, let them give us the account of it as it stands in their own imagination; and tell us, whether there was any plague at all, how, and why it came, and how it went and disappeared so all of a sudden. In their account, whatever it be, David will stand certainly clear of every imputation ; and, according to the scripture narration, he will be an offender, but only against the stat- ute law of the kingdom, as usurping an "authority and dis- pensing power that did not belong to him, but not against any law of God, of original, intrinsic, and immutable obli- gation, as far as we can judge by the short and imperfect account that is left us of this transaction ; and so may still be the *' man after God's own heart," — Chandler. Ver. 1 8. And Gad came that day to David, and said unto him, Go up, rear an altar unto the Lord in the thrashing-floor of Araunah the Jebusite. Thrashing-floors, among the ancient Jews, were only, a?! they are to this day in the East, round level plots of ground in the open air, where the corn was trodden out by oxen, the Libyc(B arece of Horace, ode i. 1. 10. Thus Gideon's floor {Judges vi. 37) appears to have been in the open air ; as was likewise that of Araunah the Jebusite ; else it would not have been a proper place for erecting an altar and of- fering sacrifice. In Hosea xiii. 3, we read oithe chajfaohich is driven by the whirhcind Irom the floor. This circum- stance of the thrashing-floor's being exposed to the agita- tion of the wind, seems to be the principa,l reason of its Hebrew name; which maybe further illustrated by the direction which Hesiod gives his husbandman, to thraah his corn in a place well exposed to the wind. From the above account it appears that a thranhivg-floor (rendered in our textual translation a void place) might well be near the entrance of the gate of Samaria, and that it might afford no improper place for the kings of Israel and Judah to hear the prophets in. — Burder, CHAPTER XXV. Ver. 23. And when David inquired of the Lord he said, Thou shalt not go up ; hut fetch a com- 240 1 KINGS. Chap. 1. pass behind them, and come upon them over ag-ainst the mulberry-trees. 24. And let it be, when thou.hearest the sound of a going in the tops of the mulberry-trees, that then thou shalt bestir thyself: for then shall the Lord go out before thee, to smite the host of the Philistines. It is doubtful whether the mulberry-tree is once men- tioned in the scriptures. If Hasselquist may be credited, it scarcely ever grows in Judea, very little in Galilee, bat abounds "in Syria and mount Lebanon. Our translators have rendered the original term Baca, by mulberry, in two difierent passages : " And when David inquired of the Lord, he said, Thou shalt not go up, but fetch a compass behind them, and come upon them over against the mulberry-trees (Becaim ;) and let it be, when thou hearest the sound of a going in the tops of the mulberry-trees, that then thou shalt bestir thyself." And the words. Who passing through the valley of Baca, make it a pool ; the rain also filleth the pools", — are in the margin, Who passing through the valley of mulberry-trees. The Seventy, in Chronicles, render it pear-trees ; in which they are followed by Aquila and the Vulgate. Some think Baca, in the eighty-fourth Psalm, is the name of a rivulet, which burst out of the earth, at the foot of a mountain, with a plaintive murmur, from which it derived its name. But it is more probable, that Baca is the name of some shrub or tree. Those who translate it •the mulberry-tree, to illustrate the passage in the psalm, pretend it grows best in the dry ground ; but this seems to be unfounded. • Marinus imagines, that Baca signifies the mulberry-tree, because the fruit of the mulberry exudes a juice resembling tears. Parkhurst rather thinks that Baca means a kind of large shrub, which the Arabs likewise call Baca, and which probably was so named from its dis- tilling an odoriferous gum. For Baca with an aleph, seems to be related to Baca with a Kay, which signifies to ooze, to distil in small quantities, to weep or shed tears. This idea perfectly corresponds with the description which Celsius has given of this valley. It is not, according to him, a place abounding with fountains and pools of water, but rugged and embarrassed with bushes and stones, which could not be passed through without labour and suffering ; a striking emblem of that vale of thorns and tears, through which all believers must pass to the heavenly Jerusalem. The great uncertainty among interpreters concerning the real meaning of the term Becaim, has induced Mr. Har- mer to hazard a conjecture, that the tree meant in this pas- sage is the weeping-willow. But this plant is not found in a dry sandy vale, where the thirsty traveller is compelled to dig for water, and to form cisterns in the earth, to re- ceive the rain of heaven. In such a situation, we expect to find the pungent aromatic shrub distilling its fragrant gum ; not the weeping-willow, the favourite situation of which is the watery plain, or the margin of the brook. — Paxton. THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS. CHAPTER I. Ver. 2. Wherefore his servants said unto him, Let there be sought for my lord the king a young virgin ; and let her stand before the king, and let her cherish him, and let her lie in thy bosom, that my lord the king may get heat. This is by no means so uncommon a thing as people in England suppose. Men of seventy years of age and up- wards often take a young virgin for the same purpose as David did, and no other. It is believed to be exceedingly healUiful for an aged person thus to sleep. " In the hot seas'n, he is kept cool, and in the cold season, warm, by sleeping with a young person ; his withered body derives nourishment from the other." Thus, decrepit men may be seen having a young female in the house, (to whom, gener- ally, they are hot married,) and to whom they bequeath a considerable portion of their property. — Roberts. Ver. 9. And Adonijah slew sheep, and oxen, and fat cattle, by the stone of Zoheleth, which is by En-rogel, and called all his brethren the king's sons, and all the men of Judah the king's servants. The oriental banquet, in consequence of the intense heat, is often spread upon the verdant turf, beneath the shade of a tree, where the streaming rivulet supplies the company with wholesome water, and excites a gentle breeze to cool their burning temples. The vine and the fig, it appears from the faithful page of inspiration, are preferred on such joyous occasions: "In that dav, saith the Lord of Hosts, shall ye call every man his neighbour under the vine and under the fig-tree." To fotmtains, or rivers, says Dr. Chandler, the Turks and the Greeks frequently repair for refreshment, especially the latter on their festivals, when whole families are seen sitting on the grass, and enjoying their early or evening repast, beneath the trees by the side of a rill. And we are assured by the same author, that in such grateful retreats they often give public entertain- ments. He visited an assembly of Greeks, who, after cele- brating a religious festival, were sitting under half tents, with store of melons and grapes, besides lambs and sheep to be killed, wine in gourds and skins, and other necessary provisions. Such appears to have been the feast which Adonijah gave his friends at En-rogel. It was held near a well or fountain of water, and there " he slew sheep, and oxen, and fat cattle, and invited his brethren" and the prin- cipal people of the kingdom. En-rogel was not chosen for secrecy, for it was in the vicinity of the royal city, but for the beauty of the surrounding scenery. It was not a mag- nificent cold collation ; the animals on which they feasted were, on the contrary, killed and dressed on the spot for this princely repast, "in Hindostan feasts are " given in the open halls and gardens, where a variety of strangers are admitted, and much familiarity is allowed. This easily accounts for a circumstance in the history of Christ, which is attended with considerable difficulty; the penitent Mary coming into the apartment and anointing his feet with the ointment, and wiping them with the hair of her head. This familiarity is not only common, but far from being deemed either disrespectful or displeasing." More effect- ually to screen the company from the burning sunbeams, a large canopy was spread upon lofty pillars, and attached by cords of various colours : " Some of these awnings," says Forbes, " belonging to the Indian emperors, were very costlv, and distinguished bv various names. That which belonged to the emperor Akber was of such magnitude as to contain ten thousand persons; and the erecting of it em- ployed one thousand men for a week, with the help of ma- chines; one of these awnings, without any ornaments, cost ten thousand rupees." Similar to these were the splendid Chap. 2. 1 KINGS 241 hangings under which Ahasuerus the king of Persia enter- tained his court. They "were -^hiie, green, and Ijlue, fastened with cords of fine linen and purple, to silver rings and pillars of marble." — Paxton. Siloam was a fountain under the walls of Jerusalem, east, between the city and the brook Kedron; it is sup- posed to be the same as the fountain En-rogel, or the Fuller's fountain. " The spring issues from a rock, and runs in a silent stream, according to the testimony of Jere- miah. It has a kind of ebb and flood, sometimes discharg- ing its current like the fountain of Vaucluse; at others, retaining and scarcely suiFering it to run at all. The pool, or rather the two pools of the same name, are quite close to the spring. They are still used for washing linen as formerly. The water of the spring is brackish, and has a very disagreeable taste ; people still bathe their eyes with it, in memory of the miracle performed on the man born blind." (Chateaubriand.)— BuRDER. Ver. 14. Behold, while thou yet talkest there with the king, I also will come in after thee, and confirm thy words. The Hebrew has for confirm, " fill up." " I wish you to go and inform Tamban, that I will gladly go into court and ^ZZ up all his words." " My friend, do not believe that man's words." — " Not believe them ! why, his words have been filled up by many people." " Well, you say you saw Muttoo turn his cattle last night into vour rice-fields, what proof have you 1" — " None, my lord, I was alone, and, therefore, have no one to fill up my words." " As Venase was coming through the cinnamon gardens, that notorious robber Kalloway met him, took from him his ear-rings, finger-rings, and five gold mohurs ; but, before he got oflT, several people came upj who knew him well, so that there "ill be plenty of witnesses to fill up his words," — Roberts. Vex. 16. And Bath-sheba bowed, and did obei- sance unto the king. And the king said, AVhat wouldest thou 1 "When a husband goes on a journey, or when he returns, his wife, on seeing him, puts her hands together, and pre- sents them to him as an act of obeisance. When she has an important request to make, she does the same thing ; and it is surprising to see the weakness of him who pretends to be the stronger vessel, for, under such circumstances, she will gain almost any thing she wants. Hence, the force of their popular proverb, " The woman who regularly makes obeisance to her husband, can make it rain whenever she g leases." When Bathsheba made her obeisance to the ing, he asked, " What wouldest thou ?' but, the Hebrew has this, " What to thee V This accords with the idiom of the Tamul language. Thus it will be asked of a person who stands with his hands presented to a great man, uvimak-enna, " To thee what 1" If speaking of a third person, avanuk-enna, " To him whatl" or, literally, " Him to what V — Roberts. CHAPTER II. Ver. 5. Moreover, thou "knowest also what Joab the son of Zeruiah did to me, and what he did to the two captains of the hosts of Israel, unto Abner the son of Ner, and unto Amasa the son of Jether, whom he slew, and shed the blood of war in peace, and put the blood of war upon his girdle that was about his loins, arid in his shoes that were on his feet. 6. Do therefore according to thy wisdom, and let not his hoar head go down to the grave in peace. David having settled this great affair of Solomon's suc- cession to his throne, but a little before his death sends for him, and gave him a particular charge, in reference to two state criminals, Joab and Shimei. That to Joab in these words : " Thou knowest also what Joab the son of Zeruiah did to me, and what he did to the two captains of the host of Israel, unto Abner the son of Ner, and unto Amasa the son of Jether, whom he slew, and shed the blood of war in peace, and put the blood of war upon his girdle that was 31 upon his loins, and in his shoes that were upon his feet ;" i. e. treacherously, and under pretence of peace and friend- ship, besprinkled his girdle and wet his shoes with the blood of these two generals, as though he had slain them in baule. "But do thou according to thy wisdom, and let not his hoar head go down to the grave in peace." Here are three murders David mentions to Solomon as the ground of this charge, not to let him die a natural death. The one inti- mated, " thou knowest what he did to me," viz. when he cruelly stabbed Absalom, contrary to my immediate orders ; the two others expressly mentioned, those of Abner and Amasa ; on these accounts he advises him to put him to death ; and I allow David's dying advice, or rather order, in this instance, to be peremptory and absolute ; and, if I understand any thing of justice and equity, it was an order worthy of a good king, and fit to be given in the last moments of his life. The reader will remember, that the facts are these. Upon Abner's reconciliation with David, and bringing over the people to his interest, Joab out of revenge for his brother Asahel's death, whom Abner, forced to it by Asahel's rashness, had unwillingly slain, and probably envying him the glory of settling David on the throne of Israel, and afraid of his being placed at the head of the Hebrew army, as the reward of so signal a service, under the pretence of a friendly salutation, m the most base and cowardly manner, stabbed him unexpectedly to the heart. David highly resented this murder, followed Abner's corpse to the grave", and to show what part he would have acted immediately, had it been in his power, says : "I am this day weak, though anointed king; and these men, the sons of Zeruiah, are too hard for me. The Lord .shall reward the doer of evil according to his wickedness." AfieT the rebellion under Absalom was ended, David thought this a proper opportunity to show his displeasure to Joab ; and as he imagined it would be an acceptable thing to the people of Israel, who were now zealous to restore the king to his throne, he ordered it to be signified to Amasa, who had been their general in the rebellion, tliat he would constitute him captain-general of his armies in the room of Joab, and actually appointed him, as such, to assemble the forces of Judah, and suppress the new insur- rection under Sheba. As Amasa was returning with his troops, Joab meets him, and with a compliment and a kiss, thrust his sword through his body, and laid him at a single blow dead at his feet; and immediately usurped the com- mand of the army, quelled the insurrection, and returned to Jerusalem. And now, reader, let me appeal to thy conscience. Were not these two execrable murders deserving of punishment 1 Was the cowardly base assassin worthy to live '? If he was too powerful a subject for David to bring to justice, did not David do well, and act like a righteous prince, to give it in charge to his successor, to punish, as soon as ever he had power, such a villain, according to his desert '? Mr. Bayle's judgment is, that David well knew that Joab deserved death, and that the suffering the assassinations, with which that man's hands were polluted, to go unpunished, was a flagrant injury done to the laws and to justice. With what truth then can it be said, that David delivered two murders in charge to his son Solomon ; one of them to be executed on his old faithful general, Joab 1 Was it charging Solomon to murder a man, to order him to put to death a criminal, for having basely committed two most execrable murders 1 Or is the doing justice on murderers and assassins commit- ting murder'? Or is the representation just, that this order, viz. to murder Joab, was afterward fulfilled in the basest manner, by the administrator to this pious testament 1 Judge, reader, and be thyself a witness to the manner of Joab's execution, which is thus stigmatized with the epithet of basest. Solomon, in obedience to his father's directions, gives orders to Benaiah to put Joab to death in these words : " Fall on him, that thou mayest take away the innocent blood which Joab shed, from me, and from the house of my father ; and the Lord shall return his blood upon his own head, who fell upon two men, more righteous and better than himself, and slew them with the sword, my father David knowing nothing thereof." Solomon "vas now king, firmly fixed on the throne, and had it in hi? power to execute justice on the greatest offenders ; and rem ^nbering, I doubt not, how Saul's house was punished f r the in- nocent blood of the Gibeonites which he spilt, hcT iswilling to secure himself and family from a like vengf nee. He 242 1 KINGS. Crap. 2 would have been in some measure chargeable with Joab's guilt, had he refused to punish it when it was in his power; and especially, as he had it in charge from his father to execute the vengeance on him that his crime deserved. But where shall we here fix the character of basest 1 What, on Solomon's command to take away the guilt of innocent blood from himself and his father's house; or on his ordering the execution of the man that shed it, the man that slew two men, more righteous and better than himself; or on God's returning his own blood upon his head ; or, on his ordering Joab to be slain at the horns of the altar, and not permitting even the altar of God himself to be an asy- lum for murderers ; or, on his appointing Benaiah, the captain of his host, to execute justice on this treacherous assassin 1 This was the manner in which Solomon per- formed his father's orders, in an open public manner, appealing to God for the reasons of his conduct, and by a hand too honourable for the wretch that fell by it. And is this, what it hath been termed, putting a man to death in the basest manner 1 Is not this condemning, as a piece of vil- lany, a most exemplary instance of royal justice, and exhibited in such a manner as showed a regard to religion, conscience, honour, and the prosperity of his government and people 1 But in order to show David's ingratitude to Joab in ordering Solomon fo punish him for the murder of Abner, it hath been urged that it appears, that Joab, uniting his revenge with the dead, acted basely for David's service. Supposing it. Doth it follow, that David's ordering the execution of a base and treacherous assassin was baseness and ingratitude, because the assassination was intended for his service 7 I do not understand this morality, I should rather raise a panegyric upon a prince, who should order a treacherous assassin to execution, notwithstanding the pre- tence of the assassin's intending to serve him by the villany ; than on one, who should protect a villain from the punishment of treachery and murder, because he in- tended to serve, or actually served him by these notorious crimes. But the supposition itself, that Joab murdered Abner for David's service is without any foundation, and contradicted by the whole history of that affair. For this asserts once and again, that .Toab murdered Abner in re- venge for his brother Asahel's death. And as to his ex- postulating with David on the imprudence of trusting Abner, saying. He came to deceive thee, and to know thy going out, and thy coming in. and all that thou dost; David had all the reason in the world to look on this change against Abner as a mere calumny. For Abner, before ever he had waited on David, had brought the elders of Israel to a resolution to accept of David for their king, and he came to inform him of this transaction. Abner went also to speak in the ears of David all that seemed good to Israel, and that seemed good to the whole house of Benjamin ; i. e. all that had been agreed on between Abner and the tribes in reference to David. So that Joab's charge of treachery against Abner was contrary to the strongest evi- dence of his integrity, and only a pretence to colour over that murder of him which he intended. Joab knew very well the intention of Abner's interview with David ; for he was informed that he had been with the king, and that he had sent him away in peace ; and he expostulated with the king for thus dismissing him, that he came only to deceive him. And therefore his murdering Abner could be with no mtention to serve David, but to execute his own re- vel ge and serve himself; for no transaction could have been at that time more directly contrary to David's interest, rs the tribes would naturally resent so cruel a breach of faith, as the treacherous assassination of their own general and ambassador to David, sent by them to fix the terms on which they would receive him for their king; and it was a thousand to one, that, in their fury, they had not broke off all treaty with him, and with their united forces opposed his accession to the throne of Israel. What prevented this was, David's so solemnly and publicly clearing himself of having any hand in the murder, and showing, to the fullest satisfaction of the people, that it was wholly the contrivance of Joab, and perpetrated by him without his privity and consent. Had Abner lived to have fini?hed this great revolution in favour of David, and actually settled him on the throne of Israel, Abner onsrht in iustice to have continued in the command of the army. This Joab cotild not be ignorant of, and therefore, uniting his revenge with his ambition, he assassinated Abner, to -free himself from a rival in power and his prince's favour, and secure himself in the chief command. He acted just the same infamous part after- ward, when he assassinated Amasa, because David had promised him to make him general of the army in Joab's room; and this strengthens the probability, or rather renders it certain, that he murdered Abner, not only out of revenge for his brother's death, but also from the same cause of jealousy, envy, and ambition. And indeed Josephus will not so much as allow, that even the revenging Asahel's death was any thing more than a pretence for Joab's mur- dering Abner, but says, that the true cause was, his being afraid of losing the generalship, the favour of his master, and being succeeded by Abner in both. It is further objected, that Joab was really ill used in the affair of Amasa. But to me it appears, that he was used no otherwise than he deserved. It is true he gained the victory over the rebels ; but the merit of this victory he destroyed by a base and infamous murder, contrary to the express command of his sovereign. For David charged Joab and Abishai, and all his officers, before the engage- ment : Deal gently, for my sake, with the young man, even with Absalom. Had Joab cut him off in the heat of the battle, he would have had somewhat to have alleged in his defence. But nothing could argue greater insolence and contempt of the king's order than Joab's conduct on this occasion. For when one of the army informed him he saw Absalom hanging by the hair in a tree, Joab re- plies : " Why didst thou not smite him there to the ground, and I would have given thee ten shekels of silver and a girdle V The soldier answered him with a noble spirit of loyalty: " Though I should receive a thousand shekels of silver, I would not put forth my hand against the king's son : for, in our hearing, the king charged thee, and Abi- shai, and Ittai, saying. Beware, that none touch the young man Absalom ; otherwise I should have wrought falsehood against my own life, and thou thyself would have set thyself against me." But what doth the loyal Joab do after this warning 1 He said : I may not tarry thus with thee. Tell me no more of the king's orders. I have something else to do; and immediately he took three darts in his hand, and thrust them through the body of Absalom, while he was hanging alive in the midst of the oak. Could there be a greater insult offered to the king than this"? Or^ a more treasonable violation of his orders'? Or, a more deliberate and aggravated murder committed? Would any prince have endured this 1 Or, ought he to have par- doned even a victorious general, after such an audacious cruel instance of disobedience 1 But not content with this, he carries his insolence to the king further, and keeps no measures of decency with him. For, upon David's mourn ing over his rebel son, Joab imperiously reproaches him " Thou hast showed this day the faces of all thy servants which this day have saved thy life, and the lives ofth} sons, and daughters, and wives ; in that thou lovest thinf enemies, and hatest thy friends. For thou hast declared this day, that thou regardest neither princes nor servants ; for this day I perceive, that if Absalom had lived, and all we had died this day, then it had pleased thee well ;" and then, to complete his audacious insolence, threatens with an oath to dethrone him, if he did not do as he ordered him, "Now therefore arise, go forth, and speak comfort- ably to thy servants ; for I swear by the Lord, if thou go not forth, there shall not tarry one with thee this night ; I will cause the whole army to revolt from thee before morning; and that will be worse unto thee than all the evil that befell thee from thy youth until now," I will appeal to all men, that know what duty or decency means, whether Joab, after such a behaviour to his sovereign, was fit to be continued general of the forces: and, whatever might be his merits in other respects, whether any prince, who consulted his own honour and safety, would not take the first opportu- nity to humble and break him? The opportunity came. Amasa, the general of the rebel army, brought Jerusalem and Judah back to their allegiance, and, according to Da- vid's promise, was constituted captain-general in the room of Joab. In defiance of this appointment, Joab, to get rid of hisrival,likeacowardand poltron, under pretence of peace, and a friendly salutation, ripped open Amasa's belly, and shed out his bowels upon the ground. But it is said, to exten- uate Joab's guilt, that he confined his resentment to his rival. Chap. 2. 1 KINGS. 243 What then'? Is a cowardly murder to be pardoned, be- cause committed on a rival 1 Do not the laws of God and man call for an exemplary punishment of such an atro-. cious ofi'ender ? Are not such treacherous cruelties, though practised towards a rival, offences of a public nature, a Dreach of that allegiance which men owe to their princes, and a capital violation of the sacred laws of government 1 David, it is plain, thought so ; and though Joab was too powerful a subject for him to call to an immediate account, yet to show that he had never forgiven it, he orders Solo- mon, agreeable to all the rules of honour and justice, to punish him' as he deserved for his numerous treasons and murders. But we are told that " it will avail nothing to plead the private faults of the man. We are now to con- sider him as relative to David in his public capacity, as his old faithful general, who powerfully assisted him on all occasions, and who adhered to him in all his extremi- ties; in which light ^we must loathe the master, who died meditating black ingratitude against so faithful, so useful a servant." I would ask : If David had had power, and had ordered the execution of Joab, immediately upon the assassination of Abner, or of Amasa, whether his master David ought to have been loathed on that account, because Joab had been an old faithful servant 1 If it should be said, that he ought to have been loathed for it, the doctrine advanced is this : that whatever person hath been an old faithful servant, or general, to any prince, and powerfully assisted him upon all occasions ; aftd murders, presuming on his own power, and past services, through malice, re- venge, or ambition, by a secret stab, and under the pre- tence of friendship, one or two of the principal officers of the kingdom; the prince, whom he serves, becomes an object of loathing and abhorrence, and is guilty of black ingratitude, if he resolves on his death, and actually exe- cutes him, as such a base and treacherous assassination deserves. No man, I believe, will coolly assert this. If it is said, that David ought not to have been loathed, but commended, if he had then ordered his execution; I think it cannot be true, that because Joab had been an old faith- ful general, &c., we ought to loathe David for ingratitude, for meditating Joab's punishment while he lived, and ex- pressly ordering it just before his death; for whatever it was just for him to do, it was just for him to order to be done; inasmuch as he really did himself what Solomon did by his order ; and because an act, that is just to-day, can- not become unjust merely by being deferred till to-morrow, or the most convenient opportunity of performing it. But it is said, that it will avail nothing to plead the private faults of Joab. What, were the murder of Abner, who had just brought over the eleven tribes to submit to David, and the assassination of Amasa, appointed general of the national forces, at the head of his troops, private faults'? High treason, murder, and felony, private faults! What then can be public ones, and what faults can be aggravated with any more heinous circumstances than these 1 But it avails nothing, it seems, to plead these private faults, in vindication of David's ordering him to be put to death by his successor ; because we are to consider him as relative to David in his public capacity. Very right: David in his public capacity was king of Israel, and Joab in his public capacity stood related to him as his general, and assisted him, and adhered to him in all extremities. David therefore, in his public capacity, was obliged, by the laws of God and man, to punish "assassinations and murders; and Joab, in his public capacity, as general, was an assassin and murderer; and therefore David, in his public capacity, as king, was obliged to punish Joab with death, in his public capacity, as general, assassin, and murderer. If Joab had been his faithful general, and frequently assisted David in his extremities, private obli- gations are in their nature inferior, and ought to give v/ay to public ones; and the yielding up such an offender to public justice, when personal obfigations might have been pleaded by the prince in his favour, was a nobler sacrifice in its nature, and renders David's merits, as a prince, the more illustrious, and himself more worthy the character of the man after God's own heart. And this Mr. Bayle thinks David ought to have done sooner, and says, that notwithstanding Joab deserved death, yet that he kept his place; he was brave, he served the king his master faith- fully, and to good purpose, and dangerous discontents might be apprehended if he attempted to punish him. These were the political reasons which made the law give place to utility. But when David had no further use for that general, he gave orders that he should be put to death. So that Mr. Bayle blames David, not for ordering Joab to be put to death at last, but for deferring to do it so long, through reasons of policy, and ordering it only when those rea.sons of policy subsisted no longer. I would here just observe, that what Mr. Bayle calls political reasons were really reasons of necessity. For Joab was too powerful a sub- ject to bring to justice. He attempted it twice, by turning him out from being general. But he restored himself to his command by murder and treason, in spite of David, who seized the very first opportunity, after Joab's power was broken, of ordering his execution. It should be added also on this head, that whatever Joab's past services were to David, and however faithful . he had formerly been to him, yet he had now been engaged in a treasonable conspiracy against him, to set aside the intended succession to the crown, and had actually pro- claimed Adonijah king of Israel during his father's life ; altogether without, and even contrary to his consent. And it is allowed, that David had on this account justifiable cause for chagrin. And it is certain, that Joab's treason, in endeavouring to depose the good old king, and advance an ambitious youth into his throne, was just reason for chagrin. And. therefore as Joab added rebellion to mur- der, David did justly, in his last moments, to order his execution by his son and successor, and he would neither have been a wise or a righteous prince, had he forgotten or refused to do it. When it is said, that Joab had not appeardS against him in actual hostility, and that his defec- tion may admit of being interpreted into a patronisation of that particular plan for the succession, rather than into a re- bellion against David, it is in part not true in fact. To pro- claim any person king, in opposition to the reigning king, is an overt act of rebellion, ana therefore of real hostility. This Joab did, and had not the design been seasonably prevented, by the loyalty and prudence of Nathan, further hostilities must have been immediately committed; David , himself at least confined, and Solomon, his intended successor, actually put to death. The plan of the succession, con- certed by Joab, in favour of Adonijah, was, in every view of it, a treasonable one. It was a plan formed without the consent of the nation, M'ithout the knowledge of David, and the appointment of God. David had, a considerable while before this, solemnly sworn to Bathsheba, that Solo- mon her son should reign after him, and sit upon his throne in his stead; and tells all the nobles and oflicers of his kingdom, that as the Lord God of Israel had chosen him, among the sons of his father, to be king over all Israel, so, of all his sons, God had chosen Solomon to sit upon the throne of the kingdom of the Lord over all Israel. To patronise therefore any other plan of succession, and ac- tually to take measures to execute that plan, was breaking oilt into open rebellion ; and the favourers, abetters, pa- trons, and aiders, in such a plan, were traitors to their king and country, and in all nations would have been punished as such ; and should it be pleaded in excuse of such per- sons, that their defection to patronise such a plan of suc- cession, was not a rebellion, it would be treated with the contempt it deserved ; and as a defection from a prince is a revolt from him, and a revolt a rebellion, they would probably be told, that they should have the choice of t)eing hanged for a defection, or rebellion, just as they pleased. I shall only take notice further, on this head, that David, in his lamentation for Abner, had declared the Lord to be* the rewarder of evil-doers; by this expression referring the punishment of Joab to the Lord. And the inference that hath been made from hence is, that David having en- joyed the benefit of Joab's services through his life, Jie having been his right hand all along, gratitude, after sxich an attachment, ought to have influenced David to have left him to the justice cf God, and not have bequeathed him death, as a legacy for his long friendship. But David did not bequeath him death for his friendship, but for his re- peated treasons and murders; which no just principle of gratitude will ever shelter; since no services, public or private, can be a compensation for these impious violations of the laws of God and man, and ought not to hinder the progress of justice in the execution of such notorious of- fenders; and were kings and princes to act according ti this notion of gratitude, the peace, order, and safety of 244 1 KINGS. Chap. 2. society, could not possibly be maintained. Besides, as Da- vid declared the Lord to be the reAvarder of evil-doers, so he really left it to the providence of God to reward Joab, by not punishing him himself, but by waiting for the prop- er opportunity to give him his reward, when it could be done consistently with his OM^n safety, and the peace of his kingdom. Joab's defection or rebellion in favour of Adoni- jah, and Solomon's establishment on the throne, furnished this opportunity, and the providence of God, by these means, brought on the punishment he had long deserved. Let Solomon explain his father's meaning in the very or- der he gives for Joab's execution. The king said to Be- naiah : " Fall upon him .... that thou mayest take away the innocent blood which Joab shed, from me and the house of my father, and the Lord shall return his blood upon his own head, who fell upon two men more righteous and bet- ter than himself, and slew them with the sword.' David therefore left Joab to the justice of God, and God execu- ted justice on him by Solomon's order; and the hand of providence was very remarkable in this transaction; in that, had Joab's treason, in patronising Adonijah's usurpa- tion, succeeded, Joab would have escaped with impunity ; for Adonijah, no doubt, out of gratitude to Joab, would have forgiven him his murders, for the sake of his servi- ces. David's meaning, therefore, in declaring that the Lord would reward the evil-doers, could be no other than that in which Solomon understood it : That though Joab was too powerful for him, at that time, to punish, yet that God would not suffer him finally to escape ; but that, sooner or later, in the course of his providence, he would bring the punishment on him which he so richly deserved. And this Joab experienced, since the very measures he took in the close of David's reign, to secure himself from it, fixed his doom, and proved his destruction. David's conduct therefore, in this instance, is no proof that his repentance for his sins was not sincere, nor any argument that he had not forgiven his enemies, as far as he ought to do it, and did not die in charity with all mankind, as far as that charity; ought to be extended. If a prince's charity influ- ences him, living or dying, to pardon repeated offences, in- consistent with the public safety and peace, such as assas- ^^inations and treasons, it is folly and weakness, and not virtuous charity ; it is cruelty to his people, instead of real generosity and goodness. David had not this charity, and it heightens his character that he had not. His last charge to Solomon shows his inviolable regard to justice, by posi- tively ordering the execution of a murderer, who was too powerful for himself to punish ; and the order was execu- ted by Solomon, in a manner worthy a wise, a just, and a great prince; or, worthy the son of such a father. — Chand- Ver. 7. But show kindness unto the sons of Bar- zillai the Gileadite, and let them be of those that eat at thy table : for so they came to me when I fled because of Absalom thy brother. At public entertainments in the courts of eastern kings, many of tlieir nobles have a right to a seat, others are ad- mitted occasionally by special favour. In this sense Chardin understands the dying charge of David to his successor, to show kindness to the sons of Barzillai the Gileadite, and to let them be of those that should eat at his table. He means not that they should eat at his tableat every meal, or on every day, but only on days of public festivity. In the same light, he views the conduct of the king of Babylon to the captive monarch of Judah : " Evil-Merodach spake kindly to Jehoiakim, and set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him in Babylon ; and changed liis prison-garments, and he did eat bread continually be- fore him all the days of his life." He received a daily allowance from the king suitable to his high station, and the value which Evil-Merodach had for him; besides this, he had a seat at all the public entertainments of the court. The eastern custom explains the reason that David was not expected at Saul's table, till the day of tbe new moon; he did not sit at the king's table every day, but according to established usage, he had a right, and was expected to be present in his allotted seat on the day of a public and solemn festival. In the same manner, though Mephibo- sheth was to sit at David's table on all public occasions, yet he wanted the produce of his lands for food at other times. It was therefore very proper to mention ihe cir- cumstances to Ziba, that he might understand it would be necessary for him to bring the produce of the lands to Jerusalem, and in sufficient quaniiiy to support Mephibo- sheth in a style suitable to the dignity of one who had a right, by the royal' grant, to appear at court, and sit at the king's table on public occasions: "Thou, therefore, and thy sons, and thy servants, shall till the land for him; and thou shalt bring in the fruits, that thy master's son may have food to eat; but Mephibosheth thy master's son shall eat bread always at my table." — Paxton. Ver. 8. And, behold, thou hast with thee Shimei the son of Gera, a Benjamite of Bahurim, which cursed me with a grievous curse in the day when I went to Mahanaim : but he came down to meet me at Jordan, ancf I sware to him by the Lord, saying, I will not put thee to death with the sword. 9. Now therefore hold him not guiltless; for thou art a wise man, and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him ; but his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood. After the charge to Solomon, to execute the due punish- ment on Joab, for his numerous and aggravated crimes, David gives him another, relative to Shimei the Ben- * jamite, who, as hath been already observed, when the king was in his flight from Jerusalem, to prevent his falling into Absalom's hands, met him, railed at, and cursed David in his journey; and as he went on, had the further insolence to pelt him with stones, and dust him with dust, crying out to the king, " Come out, come out, thou bloody man, and thou man of Belial. The Lord hath returned upon thee all the blood of the house of Saul, in whose stead thou hast reigned ; and the Lord hath delivered the kingdom into the hand of Absalom thy son ; and behold thou art taken in thy mischief, because thou art a bloody man." This, as Mr. Bayle say^s, is a small specimen of the abuses to which David was exposed among the friends of Saul ; they accused him of being a man of blood, and looked on the rebellion of Absalom as a just punishment for the mis- chiefs which they said David had done to Saul and his whole family. But surely an abuse and insult of a more atrocious and insolent nature was never offered to a prince; an insult the viler, as it had no foundation in reality or truth to support it. He twice styles him a bloody man; and tells him, that because he had reigned in the stead of Saul, the Lord had returned on him all the blood of the house of Saul. The reader will observe, that this transac- tion was before the affair of the Gibeonites; and therefore this circumstance could not enter into Shimei's thoughts, nor be any reason for his charging David with being a bloody man, and having the blood of Saul's house re- turned on him. Now, in what other respects could David be guilty of the blood of Saul's house 1 Saul's three eldest sons were slain with him in a battle with the Philistines, in which David was not present. The only remaining son that Saul had was Ishbosheth, whom Abner made king in Saul's room, in opposition to David, who was raised to the throne by the house of Judah. Ishbosheth w^as' killed by two of his captains, whom David put to death for that trea- son and murder ; and Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, the only remaining one, was restored to his patrimony, and, in all things, treated as one of David's own sons; and Saul's line by him, the eldest branch, continued down through many generations. The charge therefore that David was a bloody man, because the blood of the house of Saul was upon him, was a scandal and a lie, and uttered in the madness of the passion and malice of a man, who, being of Saul's house and family, was enraged to see that family rejected from the throne, "and David advanced to i{ in their stead. Mr. Bayle himself acknowledges, that the friends of Saul carried things too far in these reproaches against David. And vet, as though he had made too large a concession in his favour, he doth, in a manner, retract it, by adding: "It is true, that, by the testimony of God him<=elf, David was a man of blood, for which reason God would not peimit hun Ckap. 2. 1 KINGS. 245 to build the temple." But, by Mr. Bayle's good leave, David was not a man of blood, by any testimooy of God himself; nor doth either of the places he cites in proof of it, prove any such thing. The expression which Shimei made use of to revile David was, hdn o>m »-n. Thou art a via/ii of blood; an expression always used, I think, in a bad sense, to denote a cruel bloody man. But God never gave this character to David. What God said of him was that he had been a man of wars, n^iw n-'mi and hast shed blood ; or, as it is elsewhere expressed : Thou hast shed much blood, and hast made great wars. Now the shedding of blood im- plies nothing criminal, except it be shed o;n sine causa, without reason or cause ; innocent blood, as our version ren- ders ; and this very expression is used, in the same verse, in the criminal and in the good sense, to denote murder, and the justly putting the murderer to death. "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed." If then David's wars were just and necessary, the blood he shed in them was n<5t his crime; and it is evident, that when David told his son, and afterward all the princes and officers of his kicgdom, that the reason why God would not permit him to build his house, was because he had shed much blood in his wars ; he did not mention it to them as a reproach, or any crime imputed to him by God. Indeed this could not be the case, because, immediately after God had assigned this reason why he would not per- mit him to do it, yet, without in the least blaming him, he graciously gave him a proof of his peculiar favour, by assuring him, that his son should build his house, should long enjoy prosperity and peace, and that the throne of his kingdom over Israel should be established for ever. Mr. Bayle urges it as a further reason of David's being a bloody man, or else he introduces it for no purpose at all, that, to appease the Gibeonites, he delivered up to them two sons, and five grandsons of Saul, who were all seven hanged. Had Mr. Bayle told, as he ought to have d(me, the reason of David's delivering them up, it would have been no proof of hisdelia:htinginblood. He did it not by choice, but by ne- ces'^ity, and a divine order. As therefore God never charged David with being a man of blood, this charge, as thrown on him by Shimei, was false and injurious; and the observa- tion, that " here an opportunity may be taken to introduce a circumstance, which is so far material, as it serves to show, that the sanctity of David was not quite so univer- sally assented to, as may be imagined, while he was living, and his actions not only fresh in memory, but more per- fectly known, than was prudent to transmit to these dis- tant ages," is quite groundless and injudicious. For how doth the being reviled and cursed by one interested and disappointed person, and charged with crimes for which there is no foundation, but manv strong concurring circum- stances to show the falsehood of the charge; how doth this, I say, serve to prove, that David's sanctity was not so uni- versally assented to, as may be imagined 1 It is no proof that Shimei himself believed the truth of his own reproaches; nothing being more common than for men, in the extrava- gance and fury of passion, to vent many things, which they well know they have not any foundation for affirming: much less doth it serve to show that David deserved these reproaches ; and, least of all, that others believed them just, and had as bad an opinion of him, as Shimei who reviled him. If this be argument, then I will, to the fullest conviction, demonstrate, that David's sanctity was, while he lived, thought as great as any body imagines. For, in the first place, Jonathan tells Saul : " He hath not sinned against thee, his works have been to thee ward very good." In the next place, Saul, his professed enemy, acknowl- edges David's innocence, and that he was a more righteous man than himself, and that in persecuting him, "he had played the fool, and erred exceedinglv." Nay, Shimei nimself, upon whose railing against David this notable observation I am remarking upon is grounded, retracts all he had said, owns himself a slanderer and a liar, and begs pardon for his abusive impudence. " Let not my lord im- pute iniquity unto me, nor remember what his servant did perversely;' for thy servant doth know that I have sinned." From hence I argue: If Shimei's reproaching David shows his sanctity was not quite so universally assented to, as may be imagined, while he was living, therefore, a fortiori, Jonathan's, and Saul's, and Shimei's testimonv, to David's innocence and righteousness, serves to show, that the sanc- tity of David was really as universally assented to, as hath been imagined, while he was living, and all his actions fresh in memory. I must beg leave also to add, that as Shimei owned himself to be a lying, slanderous, miquitous varlet, and that the charge of David's being "a man of blood, and guilty of the blood of Saul's house," was an in- iquitous, perverse calumny ; that charge destroys its own credit and truth ; and instead of serving to show that Da- vid's sanctity was not quite so universally assented to, as may be imagined, while he was yet living, rather serves to show that it was. For, as there are several unquestionable evidences to his integrity and virtue, of persons that knew him well, and were his contemporaries ; as friends and enemies have given their united testimony in his favour, and there is but one evidence to the contrary, and that a lying one, upon record, who retracted his own charge pub- licly, and begged pardon for the falsehood of it; the sanctity of David's character in the opinion of the public, while he lived, stands unimpeached ; and Shimei's infamous cal- umny against him, refuted and falsified by himself, can never, with justice, be pressed into the service against David to defame his reputation. As to the suspicion here thrown in, that David's " actions, when fresh in memory, and perfectly known, were worse than have been repre- sented, or was prudent to transmit to these distant ages ;" surely this must have been a very unreasonable one, if the actions that have been transmitted to these ages are such, as justify the charges brought against David, and the splen- did character given him, of usurper, ungrateful, perfidious, perjured, whose conscience was his slave and his drudge, a tyrant, a Nero ; in a word, a monster and a devil. Can he be painted in worse colours than these 1 Or do the enemies of David suspect the representations they have made of the actions recorded, as injurious and false, and want further materials to bespatter one of the greatest and best of princes 1 But they needed no further memoirs to assist them. For, in spite of Shimei, and though he had retracted all his curses and calumnies, yet the world is told, after reciting Shimei's blasphemies: " This is pathetic, and truly characteristic of the tyrant," to whom the speech was addressed. But David's real character was quite the reverse of a tyrant. He never oppressed his subjects; but when he reigned over Israel, executed justice arid judg- ment among all his people; and, perhaps, there never was a prince of greater humanity and clemency, or that gave more shining and disinterested proofs of it, than Davtd, though he hath been characterized as the vilest of men, and the worst of tyrants. Shimei himself was one illustrious proof of this. For when David's officers would have effectually silenced his reproaches, by puUing the brawler to death, as he reolly deserved, what saith this Nero of the Hebrews 1 See, reader, the lineaments of his blood-thirsty disposition, in his reply to Abishai : " Let him curse, f^or if the Lord hath said unto him, curse David, who shall then say, wherefore hast thou done so ? Behold, my son, which came forth of my bowels, seeketh my life. How much more now may this Benjamite do it % Let him alone, and let him curse, if the Lord hath bidden him. It may be that the Lord will look on my affliction, and that the Lord will requite me good for his cursing this day." In this grievous calamity, David could not but see the hand of God, it was now falling heavy on him for his great sin in the affair of Uriah, and therefore ascribes the curses of Shimei to his immediate permission, and, in some measure, even to his appointment; as he was now reduced to that low condition, through the effect of his displeasure, as that this wretch dared to pour out these undeserved calumnies against him. This shows the moderation and great command of his tem- per, who w^ould deny himself the vengeance due to such an outrageous insult on his pei-son and character. Oh ! how perfect a picture doth this exhibit to us of a Nero, and who can help discerning and admiring the happy resemblance ! But it was not, it seems, piety, or humanity and goodn'^ss of heart in David, but policy and prudence, that prompted him to preserve Shimei's life. For so we are told : " Some of his retinue were at the point of silencing this brawler with the ultima ratio regum; but David prevented it ; wise- ly considering mis was not a season for proceeding to ex- tremities." "Why, what was there in the season to prevent David from punishing a treasonable reviler and brawler as he deserved *? What would David's cause and interest have suffered by permitting a single person to be put to 246 1 KINGS. Chap. 2, death, for a crime that made him worthy of it 1 There is but one possible inconveniency that would have attended it, and that is, there would have been wanting one noble in- st.mce of his generous disposition, and the government of his passions ; which is now recorded, to do honour to his memory, and heighten the glory of his truly illustrious character. But supposing that this was not a season for proceeding to extremities, yet when David recovered his throne, and had Shimei fully in his power, this surely was a season %r David's coming to any just extremities that he pleased, and he did not want very powerful advisers to make use of them ; for Abishai said to him : " Shall not Shimei be put to death for this, because he hath cursed the Lord's anointed V And is there any one man in the World, that would not have applauded David's justice, in ordering to execution a wretch that had cursed and pelted him with stones in his adversity "? It is true, Shimei owned his fault, and, as it is expressed, reflecting on David's vindictive tem- per, came to make his submission, and petition forgiveness. This persuasion, one would think, would certainly have kept Shimei from ever coming near him, and forced him to seek safety by flight. I should rather have imagined, that, reflecting on David's merciful and forgiving temper, and the experience he had lately of it, in David's not per- mitting his officers to cut him off, when he was actually cursing and stoning him, he made his submission, and pe- titioned for mercy. If David had been the vindictive Nero, which he hath been represented to be, Shimei's owning his fault would not have been his security, and he would have paid dearly for the scurrility of his abusive tongue ; espe- cially as he was one of Saul's family, whom, it is said, lest they should hereafter prove thorns in his side, he conclu- ded' it expedient to cut off". But notwithstanding this expe- diency, David accepted his acknowledgments, and told him with an oath : Thou shalt not die. But what shall we think, it is said, when we see this Nero of the Hebrews die in a manner uniform and consist- ent with the whole course of his life 1 What will be our reflections, when we find him, with his last accents, deliv- ering two murders in charge to his son Solomon? One against Jpab, the other against Shimei, which we are now t^ consider. The charge that David gave to Solomon con- cerning him runs thus : " And behold thou hast with thee Shimei, the son of Gera, a Benjamite of Bahurim, which cursed me with a grievous curse, in the day when I went to Mahanaim ; but I swore to him by the Lord, saying, I will not put thee to death with the sword. Now therefore hold him not guiltless, for thou art a wise man, and know- est what thou oughtest to do unto him ; but his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood." This is the ground of the accusation brought against David ; that when he lay on his death-bed, where all mankind resign their re- sentments and animosities, his latest breath was employed in dictating this posthumous murder to his son Solomon. My reader will not forget who Shimei was; of the house and family of Saul ; that he was a person of great power and influence in the tribe of Benjamin, of whom he had a thousand in his train, when he made his submission to Da- vid upon his restoration ; and that the manner in which he accosted David, when fleeing from Jerusalem, discovered the inward rancour of his heart, and his readiness to join in any measures to distress and disturb his government, and cause the crown to revert to the house of Saul. There- fore David puts Solomon in mind, that Shimei cursed him vnth a grievous curse, in the day that he went down to Ma- hanaim; that he was an implacable enemy to his person and family, one who was not to be trusted, and would not fail to show his hatred upon any proper occasion. It ap- pears further by the expression: "Behold thou hast with thee Shimei;" that he was now in Jerusalem; and that therefore David thought this a proper opportunity of confi- ning him, that he might not spread disaffection to Solo- mon's government, among those of his own tribe, or of any of the other tribes of Israel ; a precaution the more neces- sary in the infancy of Solomon's reign, and as some of his brethren were inclined to dispute with him the succession to the crown ; and therefore David said : " ^ut now do not thou hold him guiltless;" i. e. though I forgave him, and swore to him that he should not die, do not thou let him go off, do not leave him at ^liberty, nor treat him as an inno- cent man, that is reconciled to my family, and thy succes- sion in the throne of Israel. He is Shimei still, and wants nothing but a fair opportunity to declare it. He is now with thee. Hold him fast, keep him continually under thine eye to prevent his doing any mischief; and if thou findest him guilty of any malpractices, his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with blood ; cut him off as an old offender, and dangerous enemy, to secure thy own peace, and the safety of thy government. Further, David's telling Solomon that he sware to Shi- mei by the Lord, that he would not put him to death for his outrage and treason, is a demonstrative proof, that he did not advise Solomon to put him to death for the crime that he himself had solemnly forgiven him. For can any one imagine, that David should tell Solomon, that he had sworn by the Lord not to put Shimei to death, and, in the same breath, order him, in defiance of the oath, to be put to death by Solomon % Common decency and prudence would have made him conceal the circumstance of the oath, un- less he intended to brand himself publicly for the grossest perfidy and perjury; or, what is the real truth, to prevent Solomon from putting Shimei to death, in resentment for a crime for which he had solemnly sworn he would never execute him; and therefore it may be allowed Mr. Bayle, that strictly speaking, a man, who promises his enemy his life, doth "not acquit himself of that promise, when he or- ders him to be put to death by his will. But this doth not affect David's integrity, who either never promised him ab- solutely his life, or never gave any positive orders b}^ his will to execute him. I add therefore, that the words them- selves, when rightly rendered, imply no such order. The common rendering of them is: His hoar head bring thou doion to the grave with blood. But it is a better interpreta- tion, and supported by parallel passages, if we render them, Bring down his gray hairs to the grave for blood, or for be- ing guilty of it. Shimei was a man in blood, intentionally of murdering the king, and who actually attempted it by stoning him ; and, on that account, deserved to be put to death. Now, though David could not order Solomon to put him to death for this attempt, because he had forgiven him, yet he might justly urge it, as a reason why Solomon should keep a constant strict guard over him, in order to prevent him from any seditious practices, or put him to death, if he found him guilty of any. The authors of the critical remarks give another turn Xo the words, which may be justified also by many other places of like nature. They would have the middle words put into a parenthesis, and the negative particle A L repeated in the last clause from the first; thus: " Now therefore do not hold him guiltless (for thou art a wise man, and knowest what thou oughtest to do for him,) biit do not bring down his hoary head with blood." I would propose a liitle alteration in the reading of the prefix tJffw. '" Do not hold him guiltless, (for thou art a wise man,) nor bring down his hoary head Avith blood." According to this translation, David's direction to Solomon will be: That he should not put Shimei to death for having cursed him, because he had forgiven him upon oath ; but, at the same time, should not hold him guiltless; leaving it to Solomon's wisdom to inflict a proper punishment on him, provided it was not a capital one. If David had intended that Solomon should immediately put him to death, there would be no sense nor reason in what David adds: " Thou art a wise man, and knowest what thou oughtest to do to him ;" which is evidently the same thing as saying: I give thee no particular directions about him, only observe him. Thou art a wise man, and knowest how to manage him, and to thy prudence and care I entirely leave him. This is the natural proper meaning of the expression, which cannot be construed into any other sense, without doing violence to the words. Now, to what purpose was it to tell Solomon, that he knew how to behave to Shimei, if David's command was immediately to cut him off, and Solomon un- derstood him in this sense T* The thing is absurd in its na- ture, and there can be no meaning in a charge of this kind, viz. giving any man an absolute order to put another to death for a crime, and, in the same breath, leaving him en- tirely to the management of his own wisdom and prudence, to put him to death or not. If he gave a positive order for his death, he did not leave him to Solomon's wisdom ; and if he left him to Solomon's wisdom, as he certainly did, he did not give him any positive order for his death. It is certain that Solomon did not understand his father in this sense, of putting Shimei to death for his treason at Mahanaim; but only that he should have a watchful eyei Chap. 2. 1 KINGS. 247 over him, and prevent him from all seditious practices for the future. For what doth Solomon do after his father's deaths What, instantly put Shimei to death'? No, but as a wise man, who knew what he ought to do to him, orders him to build a house for himself at Jerusalem ; where he confines him. that he might be perpetually under his inspec- tion, and bound him by an oath never to go further out of it than to the brook Kidron ; telling him, that whenever he passed it, he should surely die. This is further evident from the different manner in which Solomon treated Joab and Shimei. Joab he immediately, on his accession, put to death, because David could be understood in no other sensj, in the charge he gave concerning him, but absolutely to cut him off; for he gives no intimation that he had par- doned him, or that he left it to his son's prudence to do with him as he should think proper ; but says peremptorily, after recounting the two murders he had committed : Do thou according to thy wisdom. Do justice on him, and thereby show thyself a wise man, and let not his hoar head go down to the' grave in peace. Now if the charge had been the same in reference to Shimei as it was to Joab, what should have prevented Solomon from immediately executing Shimei as well as Joab '? Solomon had much less to apprehend from executing Shimei, than Joab. Joab had an interest in the army, and had David's sons, and the high-priest of his party, which Shimei could not have, as he was a powerful man of the house of Saul : a circum- stance this, however, enough to incline a jealous prince to get rid of him if he fairly could do it. And if Solomon had David's positive order to do it, the regard to his father's command, and the rules of policy, would have engaged him to have immediately executed him. But this Solomon, in his wisdom, knew lie could not do ; for David told him that he had pardoned Shimei to prevent his execution, be- cause his offence was personal, and David had a right to forgive it. But he had never pardoned Joab, nor in justice could do it ; because he was guilty of death, for repeated murders, by the laws of God and man. Solomon therefore acted wisely and justly in putting Joab to death, and show- ed his prudence in reference to Shimei, by sparing him ; but honourably confining him, that he might have the prop- er security for his future good behaviour. But to this it is objected, that the executing Joab, and sparing Shimei, was owing to a different cause from what I have now assigned. For Joab, by joining the party of Adonijah, had furnished the pretence for putting him to death, which Shimei doth not appear to have done. Joab therefore was assa.ssinated, and Shimei watched. But this contradicts the history; for David, in his order to put Joab to death, mentions not one word about his being of Adonijah's party, but orders him to be cut off expressly for the treacherous assassination of Abner and Amasa. And when Solomon ordered his execution, not a word of Adonijah ; but take away the innocent blood which Joab shed from me, and from the house of my father. So that, as the cause of Joab's execution was not his being of Adonijah's party, so the cause of Shimei's being spared, cannot be said to be, because he was not of Adonijah's party. The true reason of their treatment, was the different nature of their crimes, and the difference of the order relating to them. And as Joab was put to death for repeated murders, by the express order of the king, it is with great injustice that his death is censured as an assas,sination ; especially as he was exe- cuted in the same manner as state criminals at that time generally were. Besides, if, as hath been asserted, David had, without any condition, and by a positive injunction, ordered Shimei to be put to death, then his joining, or not joining Adonijah, had been a circumstance of no weight; for, whether the one, or the other, Solomon ought not to have ordered him to be watched, but instantly to have put him to death, as he did Joab. And if, because he was not of Adonijah's party, Solomon spared him, and ordered him only to be watched, then Solomon did not think his father's order to be an order to cut him off, but only to have a watchful eye over him. For David knew Shimei's circumstances as well as Solo- mon, and Solomon's condxict to Shimei is an abundant ex- plication of the nature of his father's command, and how he Jiimself understood it. This is the sentiment of F. Houbi- ' pant, who doth not so much as give a single intimation that Shimei was watched, and not put to death, because he wa^ not of Adonijah's party ; but absolutely denies that David gave any order at all to Solomon to put him to death for the crimes which he had pardoned him, but only to watch his conduct, till he should render himself guilty by some fresh transgression. And when upon breaking his oath, he was sent for by Solomon, the king reproached him for his perjury, for acting contrary to the condition of life, which he himself acknowledged to be just and equitable, and for the wickedness that his heart was privy to in his conduct to his father David; the mercy that had been shown him, in the pardon of that offence, aggra\%ing his fresh crime in violating his oath, and in transgressing ihe king's command ; a crime that showed he was of a restless spirit, and incapable of being restrained within due bounds by the most solemn oaths, or any sense of interest, gratitude, or duty, whatsoever. Solomon adds : " The Lord shall return thy wickedness on thine own head, and King Solo- mon shall be blessed : and the throne of David shall be established before the Lord for ever ;" plainly intimating, that Solomon now cut him off, as an act of prudence and justice, because he knew him to be a turbulent implacable enemy to his person and government, and saw it necessary for establishing the throne of David before the Lord. I would further add, that Shimei himself, sensible of Solomon's great kindness to him, approves the sentence pronounced on him, and therefore the charge that David gave him, promising him upon oath obedience to the con- dition, on which his life was afterward to depend. " The sentence is good. As my Lord the king hath said, so will thy servant do." It doth not appear that Solomon mention- ed one word about Shimei's cursing David, when he or- dered him to confine himself to Jerusalem, and that there- fore this was not the immediate reason why he confined him, but as his father had forewarned him, because he thought it would be a dangerous thing to' suffer a person of Shimei's family, tribe, interest, and known rancour to his crown and government, to be entirely at liberty. And, upon this supposition, Shimei could not but own the justice of the sentence, and Solomon's lenity in pronouncing it. But if Shimei had any apprehension that David had vio- lated his oath of safety to nim by the charge he gave Solo- mon concerning him, or that Solomon had broken it, by making his life depend on a new condition, which his fa- ther had never obliged him. to come under; why did he not plead David's oath and promise, and that had no con- dition annexed to it, when he appeared before Solomon ; that the annexing a new condition to it was actually re- versing it, and therefore a breach of oath in David, if he directed it, or in Solomon, if it was his order only, and not David's'? And though David, being dead, Shimei could not reproach him to his face, yet he might have reproached him, and Solomon himself to his own face, for this breach of oath, if there had been any. But Shimei urges nothing of all this in favour of himself, and instead of reproaching David or Solomon, acknowledges the king's moderation, and says: The sentence is good. It is most just and mer- ciful. As my lord the king hath said, so will thy servant do. Shimei therefore knew, either that he had an absolute pardon from David, or that he had forfeited that pardon, or that, whatever was the purport of David's oath to him, no injustice had been done him, cither by David's charge to Solomon, or by Solomon's executing it. The adver- saries of David may choose which they please. David's honour, and Solomon's justice, will be "abundantly vindi- cated. Let me beg the candid reader's attention to another re- mark: That though it hath been positively affirmed, that David guarantied Shimei's pardon with a solemn oath, yet this is by no means certain from the history. For let it be observed, that after Shimei's confession of his fault, Abi- shai said to David: " Shall not Shimei be put to death, be- cause he cursed the Lord's anointed '?" Meaning, be put to death instantly, as appears by David's answer: "Shall there be any man put to death this day in I yachvmr, rendered bubalus by the Vulgate, probably denotes the bufalo ; and though the " flesh of a buffalo does npt seem so well tasted as beef, being harder and more coarse, yet in our times per- Chap. 4. 1 KINGS. 251 sons of distinction, as well as the common people, and even the European merchants, eat a good deal of ii in countries where that animal abounds." (Niebuhr.) — Greknfield. The flesh of the antelope is very grateful to the taste of an Oriental. It is, in the estimation of Arabian writer.'?, the most delicious and wholesome of all venison. They pronounce its juices better than these of any other wild animal, and more adapted to the human constitution. The sentiments of these venerable ancients, are confirmed by the testimony of several intelligent modern authors. Dr. Shaw says, '' it is in great esteem in the East for food, hav- ing a sweet musky taste, which is highly agreeable to their palates ;" and according to Dr. Russel, " the antelope veni- son, during the winter, or sporting season, is well fla- voured, but very lean, and in the spring is fat, and of a flavour which might vie with English venison." These statements account for its being daily served up on the sumptuous table of Solomon and other eastern, princes. Besides, the antelope has all the marks which distinguished clean animals under the law ; it both divides the hoof and chews the cud. An Israelite, therefore, might lawfully eat of its flesh, although he was not permitted to offer it in sacrifice. This creature belonged to the class of clean leasts, which the people of Israel, as well during their wanderings in the desert, as after their settlement in the and of promise, were permitted to kill wherever they could find them, and use for the subsistence of their families, although, at the time, they might be ceremonially unclean. But the ox, the sheep, and the goat, which some writers distinguished by the name of clean cattle, might both be lawfully eaten and offered in sacrifice ; yet while the cho- sen people sojourned in the wilderness, they were forbid- den to kill any of these animals, although intended merely for private use, except at the door of the tabernacle; and if ceremonially unclean, even to eat of their flesh. This regulation occasioned little inconvenience to the tribes in the desert, where they lived in one vast encampment, in the midst of which the sacred tent was pitched ; but after their settlement in Canaan, their circumstances required either an alteration in the law, or that the greater part of the nation should abstain altogether from the use of flesh. The permission was accordingly enlarged; while they were still restricted to shed the blood of cattle intended for sacrifice, only before the national altar, they were permitted, when too far from the tabernacle, to kill those which they de- signed merely for common food, in any of their cities, or in their houses ; even the ceremonial regulation was abol- ished, and in private clean and unclean fared alike. This permission, which is couched in very express terms, is repeated in the course of a few verses, lest the suspicious mind of an Israelite might suppose that Jehovah envied his people the enjoyment of what he had given them ; and " in both instances it is illustrated by an example which must, from the use of it, have been familiar to the Israel- ites:" " The unclean and the clean may eat thereof, as of the (antelope,) and of the hart." — Paxton. The great number of beasts required daily in Solomon's kitchen, will by no means be found incredible, when we compare it with the accounts of the daily consumption of oriental courts in modern times, and the prodigious num- ber of servants of an Asiatic prince. Thus Tavernier, in his description of the seraglio, says, that five hundred sheep and lambs were daily required for the persons belonging to the court of the sultan. — Rosenmuller. Ver. 25. And Judah and Israel dwelt safely, every man under his vine and under his fig- tree, from Dan even to Beer-sheba, all the days of Solomon. Plantations of trees about houses are found very useful in hot countries, to give them an agreeable coolness. The ancient Israelites seem to have made use of the same means, and probably planted fruit trees rather than other kinds, to produce that effect. " It is their manner in many places," says Sir Thomas Row's chaplain, speaking of the country of " the Great Mogul, "to plant about, and among their buildings, trees which grow high and broad, the shadow whereof keeps their houses by far more cool : this I observed in a special manner when we were ready to en- ter Amadavarj for it appeared to us, as if we had been en- tering a wood rather than a city," The expression in the Old Testament, of people dwelling under their vines and their Jig-irees, seems strongly to intimate, that this method anciently obtained much in Judea ; and that vines and fig- trees were what were commonly used in that country. Nor was this management at all to be wondered at ; as the an- cient patriarchs found it very agreeable to pitch their tents under the shade of some thick tree, their children might naturally be disposed to plant them about their houses. And as it was requisite for them to raise as many eatables as they could, in so very populous a country as that was, it is no wonder they planted fig-trees, whose shade was thickened by* vines, about their houses, under which they might sit in the open air, and yet in the cool. This writer mentions another circumstance, in which there is an evident simi- larity between the ancient Jews and these more eastern people : " But for their houses in their aldeas, or villages, which stand very thick in that country, they are generally very poor and base. All those country dwellings are set up close together; for I never observed any house there to stand single, and alone." The account the Baron De Tott gives of the Egyptian villages, shows they are shaded in much the same manner. " Wherever the inundation can reach, their habitations are erected on little hills, raised for that purpose, which serve for the common foundation of all the houses which stand together, and which are contrived to take up as little room as possible, that they may save all the ground they can for cultivation. This precaution is necessary, to prevent the water's washing away the walls, which are only of mud. The villages are always surrounded by an infinite num- ber of pointed turrets, meant to invite thither the pigeons, in order to collect the dung. Every village has, likewise, a small wood of palm-trees near it, the property of which is common : these supply the inhabitants with dates for their consumption, and leaves for fabrication of baskets, mats, and other things of that kind. Little causeways, raised, in like manner, above the inundation, preserve a commu- nication during the time it lasts." Palm-trees, according to this, are planted universally about the Egyptian villages; had they been as generally about the Jewish towns, Jeri- cho would hardly have been called the city of palm-trees, by way of distinction from the rest. It appears to have been, in Judea, rather a peculiarity. But the Jewish towns and houses might be wont to be surrounded by other trees, proper for their use, which probably were vines and fig- trees, which furnished two great articles of food for their consumption, and the cuttings of their vines must have been useful to them for fuel. That plantations of some sort of trees were common about the Jewish towns, may be de- duced even from the term -^D^ kopher, used in their lan- guage for a /illage, which is derived from a root that sig- nifies to coit.r or hide. — Harmer. Immediately on entering, I was ushered into the court- yard of the Aga, whom I found smoking under a vine, surrounded by horses, servants, and dogs, among which I distinguished an English pointer. — Turner, Ver. 28. Barley also and straw for the horses and dromedaries brought they unto the place where the officers were, every man according to his charge. Besides provisions for themselves, the Orientals are obliged to carry food for the beasts on which they ride, or carry their goods. That food is of different kinds. They make little or no hay in these countries, and are therefore very careful of their straw, which they cut into small bits, by an instrument which at the same time thrashes out the corn; this chopped straw, with barley, beans, and balls made of bean and barley-meal, or of the pounded kernels of dates, are what they are wont to feed them with. The officers of Solomon are accordingly said to have brought, every man in his month, barley and straw for the horses and dromedaries, I Kings iv. 28. Not straw to litter them with, there is reason to think, for it is not now used in those countries for that purpose ; but chopped straw for them tc eat alone with their barley. The litter they use for them is their own dung, dried in the sun, and bruised between their hands, which they heap up again in the morning, sprinkling it in the summer with fresh water to keep it 252 1 KINGS. Chap. 5, from corrupting. In sonr.e other places we read of proven- der and straw, not barley and straw : because it may be, other things were used for their food anciently, as well as now, besides barley and chopped straw. V^Sn beleel, one of the words translated provender. Is. xxx. 24, implies some- thing of mixture, and the participle of the verb Irom which it is derived is used for the mingling of flour with oil; so the verb in Judges xix. 21, may be as well translated, " he mingled (food) for the asses," oivan'? s^-^t veyabal lechamo- reem, as, he gave them provender, signifying that he mixed some chopped straw and barley together for the asses. And thus also barley and chopped straw, as it lies just after reap- ing unseparated in the field, might naturally be expressed by the Hebrew word we translate provender, which signi- fies barley and straw that had been mingled together, and accordingly seems to be so, Job xxiv. 6, " They reap every one his corn in the field" — " Hebrew, mingled corn, or dredge," says the margin. What ideas are usually affixed to secondary translation, I do not know ; but Job apparent- ly alludes to the provender, or heap of chopped straw and corn lying mingled together in the field, after having pass- ed under the thrashing instrument, to which he compares the spoils that were taken from ihe passengers, so early as his time, by those that lived somewhat after the present manner of the wild Arabs, Avhich spoils are to them what the harvest and vintage were to others. To this agrees that other passage of Job where this word occurs, ch. vi. 5, " Will the ox low, in complaint, over his provender V or fodder, as it is translated in our version ; when he has not only straw enough, but mixed with barley. The accurate Vitringa, in his commentary, has taken no- tice of that word's implying something of mixture which is translated provender in Is. xxx. 24, but for want of more nicely attending to eastern customs, though he has done it more than most commentators, he has been very unhappy in explaining the cause of it; for he supposes it signifies a mixture of siraw, hay, and bran. I have nowhere observ- ed in books of travels, that they give their labouring beasts bran in the East, and hay is not made there ; the mixture that is meant, if we are to explain it by the present eastern usages, is chopped straw and barley. But the additional word there translated clean, and in the margin leavened, which, Vitringa observes, is the proper meaning of the word, may be supposed to make the passage difficult. The Sepiuagint seem to have thought the words signified nothing more than straw mingled with winnowed barley : and if the word translated provender, though originally intended to ex- press mixture, might afterward come to signify uncompound- ed food, as Vitringa supposes, the passage is easily decipher- ed; for though the word translated clean does commonly signify leavened^ or made sour, yet not always; signifying sometimes mere mixing, as in Is. Ixiii. 1, where it is used for staining a garment with blood, and so it may signify here, as the Septuagint seem to have understood the pas- sage, chopped straw, leavened or mixed with barley. But there is no necessity of supposing the word translated prov- ender is used in a sense different from its common and an- cient meaning, and signifying uncompounded meat for cat- tle ; that single word may be understood to mean chopped straw mingled with barley, fiince we find that barley, when given to beasts of labour, is sometimes mingled, or, to ex- press it poetically, leavened, with a few beans, to which therefore the prophet might refer. The wild Arabs, who are extremely nice in managing their horses, give them no food but very clean barley. The Israelites were not so scrupulous, as appears from the passage I cited relating to the provision made for Solomon's horses, but they may nevertheless think the cleanness of the provender a very great recommendation of it, and seem to have done so, since Isaiah, in the above-mentioned passage, speaks of leavened provender winnowed with the shovel and with the fan. It is not the more important to them, as a good deal of earth, sand, and gravel, are wont, notwithstanding all their precautions, to be taken up with the grain, in their way of thrashing. But though the Israelites were not so scrupulous as the Arabs, giving their beasts of burden straw as well as barley, yet it must have been much more commodious for them in their journeying to have carried barley alone, or balls of bean, or barley-meal, rather than a quantity of chopped straw, with a little other provender of a better kind; and accordingly we find no mention made by Dr. Shaw, of any chopped straw being carried with them to Mount Sinai, but only barley, with a few beans in- termixed, or the flour of one or other of them, or both, made into balls with a little water. The Levile's mention- ing therefore his having straw, along with other proven- der, rather conveys the idea of his being a person in mean circumstances, who was not able to feed his asses with pure barley, or those other sorts of provender that eastern trav- ellers are wont to carry with them. — Harmer. In the East, horses are still fed with barley. Hasselquist observes, that in the plain of Jericho, the Arabians had sown barley for their horses. They are very careful of their straw, which they cut into small bits, by an instru- ment which at the same time thrashes out the corn : this chopped straw, with barley, beans, and balls made of bean and barley-meal, or of the pounded kernels of dates, are what they usually feed their beasts with. — Maillet. CHAPTER V. Ver. 6. Now therefore command thou that they hew me cedar-trees out of Lebanon ; and my servants shall be with thy servants : and unto thee will I give hire for thy servants according to all that thou shalt appoint : for thou knowest that there is not among us any that can skill to hew timber like unto the Sidonians. The Hebrew word tin aroz, whence the Chaldee and Syriac nt-^s arzo, and the Arabic and Ethiopic t-nn arz, and Spanish alerze, unquestionably denotes the cedar; it is thus rendered by the Septuagint and other Greek versions Kdp'i?, and by the Vulgate cedras; and the inhabitants of motmt Lebanon still call it arz. The cedar is a large and noble evergreen tree, and according to Tournefort makes a dis- tinct genus of plants, but it is comprehended by Linnaeus among the junipers. — Greenfield. The cedar grows, it is true, on the mountains of Amanus and Taurus, in Asia Minor, but it does not there attain the height and strength it acquires on mount Lebanon, on which account the cedars of Lebanon have been renowned from the most ancient times. But the cedar woods, which for- merly covered a part of this mountain, have long ago vanished. Only on the northeast side is a small wood, consisting of an inconsiderable number of small thick cedars, and eight or nine hundred younger ones. The old- est and largest cedars are distinguished from the younger ones chiefly by this, that the laUer grow up straight, and their boughs branch out horizontally from the stem, but hang down a little ; and in these two particulars, and in general in their whole form, entirely resemble our Euro- pean pines and firs ; whereas the old cedars have a short and very thick trunk, which divides not far from the root, into three, four, or five large arms, which grow straight up, and are very thick ; some of them grow together for about ten feet. " These trees," says Rauwolf, " which remain green during the whole year, have large trunks, which maybe some fathoms thick, and as high as our firs; but as they have larger arms, according to which the stem bends, this takes away so much of their perpendicular height. The branches spread out pretty far in such a beautiful equality, that they look as if they had been clippeo above, and made even with particular care. It may easilj be perceived before you get very near them, that there is f great difference between these and other resinous tree Otherwise they nearly resemble larch-trees, especially in the leaves, which are small, narrow, and shoot out as close together." The latest accounts of the cedars of Lebanon are giveh by Mr. John Henry Mayer, who visited this part in the summer of the year 18113. " I counted," says he, " nine principal cedar-trees, which were distinguished from all the others by their thickness and age, but not by their height, for younger ones exceed them in this respect. I measured the circumference of the trunk of one of the largest with a cord, about fouT feet from the ground, and found it ten French ells and a half A single branch was thirty steps in length to the end, when it divided into small twigs. The trunk of five of the largest consists of three or four division^, each of which equals in circumference the stem of our largest oaks. The cedar itself, probably, belongs to the class of trees with acerose leaves, but is neither a pine, nor CiiAP. 5—7. 1 KINGS, 253 a fir, nor a larch, though the young cedars are like the lat- ter. The broken twigs almost resemble the elder, and the smell puts one in mind of the arbor vitge. The greatest beauty of these trees consists in their stiff, strong, and far- spreading boughs ; and, what no other kind of tree has, the briitjeness of the wood, even of the smallest and tenderest twigs, which broke like glass, particularly the old ones. The whole wood, probably, does not contain above eight or nine hundred trees, large and small included. The young and middle-aged ones bore fruit of the size of an egg, which were bright green, with brown rings and spots, and stood upright on the small twigs. This peculiarity of the fruit of the cedar also distinguishes it from other trees of the same genus: in other respects, it has an affinity and resem- blance to them, as well by its resinous quality as its form." Hardly any kind of wood unites so many good qualities for building as the cedar : its wood not only pleases the eye by its reddish stripes, and exhales an agreeable smell, but it is hard, and without knots, and is never eaten by worms, and lasts so long, that some persons consider it as imperishable. Hence it was used for rafters and boards, either to cover the houses or floors: it was also employed in building the principal wall ; and combined with stones, so that, for in- stance, after three layers of stones, there followed one of cedar-wood. 1 Kings vi. 36. vii. 12. Ezra vi. 3, 4. Some- times, too, each division of the wall was built alternately with cedar-wood and stones, so that first a course of wood, and then a ccurse of stones, extended from one division to the other, and so each division nearly resembled a chess- board. The temple at Jerusalem, as well as the palace of Solomon, was built of cedar; and in the latter there was such a quantity of this wood, that it was called, 1 Kings vii. 3. X. 10, The house of the forest of Lebanon. (Rosen- muUer.)— BuRDER. Ver. 9. My servants shall bring them down from Lebanon unto the sea ; and I will convey them by sea in floats unto the place that thou shalt appoint me, and will cause them to be dis- charg-ed there, and thou shalt receive them: and thou shalt accomplish my desire in giving food for my household. Bishop Patrick supposes, " that they conveyed the pieces of timber from the high parts of the mountains to the river Adonis, or to the plain of Biblos." " By floats is probably meant that the pieces of timber were bound together, and so drawn through the rivers and the sea." In exactly the same way, timber is conveyed in all parts of the East. The trees are cut down before the rainy season, all the branches are lopped off, and the trunks are squared on the spot. Notches are then made in the logs, and they are tied together by ropes made of green withes gathered in the forests. If, however, the waters of the rainy season should not reach the spot where they are hewn down, they are dragged singly to the place where it is known that in the wet monsoon they will float. Thus, in passing through re- mote forests in the dry season, the inexperienced traveller, in seeing numerous trees felled in every direction, and then again, in another place, a large collection bound together like a raft, which is also fastened to trees that are still standing, (to prevent it from being lost when the floods come,) is at a loss to know how it can be got to the river, or to the sea ; for he sees no track or path except that which is made by the wild beast: he knows no vehicle can ap- proach the place, and is convinced that men cannot carry It. But let him go thither when the rains have fallen, and he will see in one place men in a little canoe winding through the forest, in another directing a float with some men on it moving gently along ; and in the river he sees large rafts sweeping down the stream, with the dexterous Steersmen making for some neighbouring town,, or the more distant ocean ; and then may be seen in the harbour immense collections of the finest timber, which have been brought thither " by sea in floats." Sometimes the rains come on earlier than expected ; or the logs may not have been fastened to trees still standing ; hence, when the floods come, they naturally move towards the river; and then may be seen noble trees whirling and tumbling along till they reach the sea, and are thus lost to man. — Roberts. Two methods of conveying wood in floats appear to have been practised. The first by pushing single trunks of trees into the water, and suffering them to be carried along by the stream. This was commonly adopted as it regarded firewood. The other was ranging a number of planks close to each other in regular order, binding them together, and steering them down the current. This was probably the most ancient practice. The earliest ships or boats were nothing else than rafts, or a collection of deals and planks bound together. By the Greeks they were called Schedai, and by the Latins, Rates. The ancients ventured out to sea with them on piratical expeditions, as well as to carry on commerce : and after the invention of ships, they were still retained for the transportation of soldiers, and of heavy burdens. Pliny, lib. vi. cap. 56. Strabo, lib. xvi. Schefl^er, De Militia Navali Veterum, lib. i. cap. 3. Pitisci, Lexicon Antiquital. Rom. art. Rates. Solomon entered into a con- tract with Hiram, king of Tyre, by which the latter was to cause cedars for the use of the temple to be cut down on the western side of mount Lebanon, above Tripoli, and to be floated to Jaffa. At present no streams run from Lebanon to Jerusalem ; and the Jordan, the only river in Palestine that could bear floats, is at a great distance from the cedar- forest. The wood, therefore, must have been brought along the coast by sea to Jaffa. — Burder. CHAPTER VI. Ver. 7. And the house, when it was in building, was built of stone made ready before it was brought thither: so that there was neither hammer, nor ax, nor any tool of iron, heard in the house while it was in building. This passage is illustrated by what D'Arvieux remarks of Alexandria in Eg>'pt. " The city gates, which ai^ still standing, have a magnificent appeai-ance, and are so high and broad, that we may infer from them the ancient great- ness and splendour of the place. They properly consist only of four square stones ; one of which serves as the threshold, two are raised on the sides, and the fourth laid across and resting upon them. I need not say that they are of great antiquity ; for it is well known, that for many centuries past such immense stones have not been used in building. It is a matter of surprise how the ancients could raise such heavy masses from the stone quarries, remove them, and set them up. Some are of opinion that these stones were cast, and, probably, only consisted of a heap of small stones, which were united by" the fiiiest cement ; that at the place where they were wanted, wooden models or moulds were made, in which the cement and stones were mixed together, and when this mass became dry and suf- ficiently firm, the mould was taken off by degrees, and the stones then polished." — Rosenmuller. Ver. 1 8. And the cedar of the house within was carved with knobs and open flowers. The people of the East are exceedingly profuse in their carved work. See a temple ; it is almost from its founda- tion to its summit a complete mass of sculpture and carved work. Look at their sacred car in which their gods are drawn out in procession, and you are astonished at the labour, taste, and execution displayed by the workmen in carved work : nay, the roof and doors of private dwellings are all indebted to the chisel of the " cunning worlnnan." The pillars that support the verandas, their chests, theii couches, (as were those of Solomon,) the handles of differ- ent instruments, their ploughs, their vessels, (however rude in other respects,) must be adorned by the skill of the carver. — Roberts. CHAPTER VII. ^ Ver. 7. Then he made a porch for the throne where he might judge, even the porch of judg- ment : and it teas covered with cedar from one side of the floor to the other. It deserves remark, that the eastern floors and ceilings are JTist the reverse of ours. Their ceilings are of wood ; ours of plaster or stucco-work; their floors are of plaster or of painted tiles, ours of wood. This effectually detects a 254 1 KINGS. Chap. 7—10. mistake of Kimchi and R. Solomon, who, according to Buxtorf, supposed the floor of the porch of judgment which Solomon built was all of cedar ; whereas the sacred writer, 1 Kings vii. 7, undoubtedly meant its covering a-top, its ceiling, was of cedar. Indeed here in the West, where these Jewish Rabbis lived, such places are usually built after the eastern mode, which makes their mistake so much the more strange. Westminster Hall is, I think, paved with stone and ceiled with wood ; and such without doubt was the ceiling and the pavement of the porch for judgment which Solomon built, and which was erected in a much hotter climate. — H.4rmer. Ver. 10. And the foundation was o/ costly stones, even great stones, stones of ten cubits, and stones of eight cubits. In the ruins of Balbec, stones of great magnitude are found. " But what is still more astonishing, is, the enor- mous stones which compose the sloping wall. To the west the second layer is formed of stones which are from twenty- eight to thirty-five feet long, by about nine in height. Over this layer, at the northwest angle, there are three stones, which alone occupy a space of one hundred and seventy- five feet and one half: viz. the first, fi'ty-eight feet seven inches; the second, fifty-eight feet eleven; and the third, exactly fifty-eight feet ; and each of these are twelve feet thick. These stones are of a white granite, with large i^hining flakes, like gypse. There is a quarry of this kind of stone under the whole city, and in the adjoining mount- ains, which is open in several places : and, among others, on the right, as we approach the city, there is still lying there a stone, hewn on three sides, which is sixty-nine feet two inches long, tAvelve feet ten inches broad, and thirteen feet three in thickness." (Volney.) " The city of Jerusalem is utterly unlike any other place I have ever seen. Its situation upon an immense rock, surrounded by valleys that seem cut out by the chisel ; the contrast exhibited between the extremest degree of barren- ness and the extremest degree of fertility, which border upon each other here almost every yard, without one shade of mitigated character on either side; the structure of the walls, many of the stones in which are fifteen or sixteen leet long, by four high and four deep, the very size men- tioned of the hewn stones of Solomon, 1 Kings vii. 10; the houses, where almost every one is a fortress, and the streets, where almost every one is a covered way, altogether formed an appearance totally dissimilar from that of any other town I have met with either in Europe or Asia." (Carlyle.)— BuRDER. CHAPTER VIII. . Ver. 31. If any man trespass against his neigh- bour, and an oath be laid upon him to cause him to swear, and the oath come before thine altar in this house. Bishop Patrick alleges, that it was the custom of all na- tions to touch the altar when they made a solemn oath, calling God to witness the truth of what they said, and to punis>h them if they did not speak the truth : and he sup- poses, that Solomon alludes to this practice, in his prayer at the dedication of the temple : " If any man trespass against his neighbour, and an oath be laid upon him, to cause him to swear, and the oath come before thine altar in this house." But the royal suppliant says not one word about touching the altar ; but clearly refers to the general practice of standing before it, for his words literally are : And the oath come (in^ro ^jsV) before the face of thiiie al- tar. In imitation of God's ancient people, many of the sur- rounding nations, among whom Livy and other celebrated writers of antiquity mention the Athenians, the Cartha- ginians, and the Romans, were accustomed to stand before the altar when they made oath ; but it does not appear they laid their hand upon it, and by consequence, no argument from the sacred text, nor even from the customs of these nations, can be drawn for the superstitious practice of lay- ing the hand upon the gospels and kissing them, instead of the solemn form authorized by God himself, of lifting up the right hand to heaven.— Paxton. Ver. 44. If thy people go out to battle against their enemy, whithersoever thou shalt send them, and shalt pray unto the Lord towards the city which thou hast chosen, and towards the house that I have built for thy name. " By a decree passed in the eighteenth year of the Em- peror Adrian, the Jews were forbidden not only to enter into the city of Jerusalem, (then called CElia,) but even to turn their looks towards it ; which most probably had a ref- erence to this custom of turning their faces towards the Holy City at their prayers. I observed that Mecca, the country of their prophet, and from which, according to their idea, salvation was dispensed to them, is situated towards the south, and for this reason they pray with their faces turned towards that quarter." (Mariti.) " The Mexicans prayed generally upon their knees, with their faces turned toM^ards the east, and, therefore, made their sanctuaries with the door to the west." (Cullen's Mexico.) In a description of the people of the Ganow hills, we find the same custom prevalent. " Their mode of swearing is very solemn : the oath is taken upon a stone, which they first salute, then, with their hands joined and uplifted, their eyes steadfastly fixed to the hills, they call on Mahadeva in the most solemn manner, telling him to witness what they declare, and that he knows whether they speak true or' false. They then again touch the stone, with all the appearance of the utmost fear, and bow their heads to it, calling again upon Maha- deva. They also, during their relation, look steadfastly to the hills, and keep their right hand upon the stone. When the first person swore before me, the awe and reverence with which the man swore forcibly struck me : my Moher- rir could hardly write, so much was he affected by the so- lemnity. I understand their general belief to be, that their god resides in the hills ; and though this belief may seem in- consistent with an awful idea of the divinity, these people appeared to stand in the utmost awe of their deity, from the fear of his punishing them for any misconduct in their fre- quent excursions to the hills." (Asiatic Researches.) " An hour before sunrise, the coffeegee having prepared our coffee, retired into a corner of the room, and having, with- out the least reserve, performed the necessary ablutions, spread his garment on the ground, and began his prayers: he turned himself to the east, and though several persons entered and left the apartment during his devotions, he seemed quite absorbed, and rose, and knelt, and prostrated himself with as much appearance of piety as if he had been praying in the holy temple of Mecca itself." (Macmichel.) BuRDER. Ver. 66. On the eighth day he sent the people away: and they blessed the king, and went unto their tents joyful and glad of heart, for all the goodness that the Lord had done for Da- vid his servant, and for Israel his people. The Hebrew has, for blessed, " thanked." The Tamul translation has, for blessed, "praised." So in Joshua xxii. 33, also in 2 Sam.xxii.47, and in all other passages where the word occurs, (when used in reference to God,) it is rendered, " praise," or " praised." The word bless, among the Hindoos, is, I think, not used, as in English, to praise, to glorify, but to confer happiness, to convey a bene- dictio^i, or to shoiv good-will. Si. Paul says, " Without all contradiction, the less is blessed of the greater ;" and this I believe, joined with greatness, is the only idea the Orientals attach to those who bless others. Hence he who blesses another, must be a superior, either in years, rank, or sanctity. The heathen never bless their gods. — Roberts. CHAPTER X. Ver. 1. And when the queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon concerning the name of the Lord, she came to prove him with hard questions. The Septuagint has, for hard questions, annynam, enig- mas, riddles. The Hindoos (especially their females^ take great delight in riddles, apologues, and fables. By this method they convey pleasure, instruction, or reproof. See Chap. 10. 1 KINGS. 255 them in their marriage feasts, or in their " evenings at home ;" how pleasantly thej^ pass their time, in thus puzzling each other, and calling forth the talents of the young. — Roberts. Ver. 4. And when the queen of Sheba had seen all Solomon's wisdom, and the house that he had built, 5. And the meat of his table, and the sitting of his servants, and the attendance of his ministers, and their apparel, and his cup-bearers, and his ascent by which he went up unto the house of the Lord ; there was no more spirit in her. By these words we may understand that this ascent was consecrated to the use of Solomon alone. Thus we are told by Sir George Staunton, in his account of the first presenta- tion of the British embassy, that, " on his entrance into the tent, the emperor of China mounted immediately the throne by the front steps, consecrated to his use alone." He also informs us, that " one highway was reserved for the use of the emperar alone ; this was rendered perfectly level, dry, and smooth : cisterns were contrived on the sides of the imperial road, to hold water for sprinkling it occasionally, in order to keep down the dust : parallel to the emperor s, was another road, not quite so broad, nor swept continually with so much care, but perfectly commodious and safe : this was intended for the attendants of his imperial majesty : and upon this the British embassy was allowed to pass. All other travellers were excluded from these two privileged roads, and obliged to make out a path wherever they were able." — BuRDER. Ver. 8. Happy are thy men, happy are these thy servants, which stand continually before thee, and that hear thy wisdom. " When the king" (of Persia) " is seated in public, his sons, ministers, and courtiers, stand erect, with their hands crossed, and in the exact place of their rank. They watch the looks of the sovereign, and a glance is a mandate. If he speak to them, you hear a voice reply, and see their lips move, but not a motion nor gesture betrays that there is an- imation in any other part of their frame." "When he places himself at the windows of his palace, his domestics take their station in the court before it, hard by the fountain which plays in the middle, to watch the looks of their lord. f\. principal part of the regal state in Persia consists in the number of the men who stand before the monarch ; and we learn from the address of the queen of Sheba to Solomon, that he was not indifferent to this part of eastern splendour. It is reckoned an act of great humility in the king of Persia, or even in a person of high rank, to walk on foot, this being a part of the service exacted from servants. When a prince or great man goes abroad, he is mounted on a horse, and always attended by a multitude of servants on foot, one bearing his pipe, another his shoes, another his cloak, a fourth his saddle-cloth, and so on, the number increasing with the dignity of the master. These statements impart great force to the remark of the wise man : " I have seen servants upon horses, and princes walking as servants upon the earth." — Paxtok. Ver, 16. And King Solomon made two hundred targets of beaten gold ; six hundred shekels of gold went to one target. The word m-itsinnah, used for those martial ensigns of royal dignity, which were carried before King Solomon, and which our version renders tars^ets, 1 Kings x. 16, was supposed by the Septuagintto signify spears or lances : and , as the word is to be understood to signify some sharp- -pointed weapon, it may be more natural to understand it of , tL lance, than of a defensive piece of armour with a short sharp-pointed umbo in the middle, considering that shields , of gold were also carried before this prince, at solemn seasons. One can hardly find a disposition to admit, that two sorts of things so much alike as targets and shields, should be meant here; and if such similar defensive ■ pieces of armour were hardly meant, the translation of the Septuagint is as^atural as any, to say nothing of the au- thority of so and(jpit a version, in which, so far as appears by Lambert Bos, all the copies, which frequently disagree in other matters, concur. But whatever we may think of this way of translating the original word, we can hardly suppose such martial ensigns of honour were unknown in the time when this translation was made. It is certain they now appear in the Levant. Thus Windus, in his descrip- tion of a pompous cavalcade of the emperor of Morocco, tells us, that after several parties of people were passed, " came Muley Mahomet Lariba, one of the emperor's sons ; he is alcaid of the stables, or master of the horse : there attended him a guard of horse and foot, at the head of w^hich he rode with a lance in his hand, the place where the blade joins to the wood covered with gold." Soon after which came the emperor himself. The account of this lance seems to give a clear illustra- tion, of what the Septuagint referred to in their translation of this passage ; if not of the original of the Hebrew his- torian. A comparatively modern prince of Persia seems to have emulated this piece of grandeur of Solomon, and to have even surpassed it, though by means of a different kind of weapon from either of those I have been mentioning. According to d'Herbelot, he had two troops of horsemen, consisting of a thousand each ; one troop carrying maces of gold, each of which weighed one thousand drachms, or thousand crowns of gold ; the second, maces of silver of the same weight. These two brigades served him for his ordi- nary guard, and upon extraordinary ceremonies each of these horsemen carried his mace upon his shoulder. One tenth part of the number would have been extremely majes- tic. — Harmer. Ver. 18. Moreover, the king made a great throne of ivory, and overlaid it with the best gold. The throne of Solomon is described as having been ex- tremely magnificent, (1 Kings x. 18,) having twelve licos; but on what part of it these ornamental animals were placed is not easy to determine, as we have no accurate idea of its form and construction. We shall therefore now merely extract a description of the mogul's throne, which we finH had divers steps also, and, on the top of its ascent, four lions; wherein it seems to bear a partial resemblance to Solomon's stately seat of majesty. " And further, they told me, that he (the mogul) hath at Agra a most glorious throne within his palace, ascended by divers steps, "which are covered with plates of silver; upon the top of which ascent stand four lions, upon pedestals of curious coloured marble; which lions are all made of massy silver, some part of them gilded with gold, and beset with precious stones. Those lions support a canopy of fine gold, under which the mogul sits when he appears in his greatest state and glory." — (Sir Thomas Roe's Voyage.) Thrones were of different kinds; sometimes they resem- bled a stool, sometimes a chair, sometimes a sofa, and sometimes they were as large as a bed. One of the thrones of Tippoo Saib was the back of a very large royal tiger, made of gold, studded with precious stones ; and that part of his back which was employed as a seat, was covered with fine chintses, &c. by way of cushions. — Taylor in Calmet, Ver. 20. And twelve lions stood there on the one side, and on the other, upon the six steps : there was not the like made in any kingdom. In after ages we read of thrones very glorious and ma- jestic. AthanaBUs saj'^s, that the throne of the Parthian kings was of gold, encompassed with four golden pillars, beset with precious stones. The Persian kings sat in judg- ment under a golden vine, (and other trees of gold,) the bunches of whose grapes were made of several sorts of precious stones. To this article mav be very properly an- nexed the following account of the famous peacock thront of the Great Mogul. " The Great Mogul has seven thrones, some set all over with diamonds; others with rubies, eme- ralds, and pearls. But the largest throne is erected in the hall of the first court of the palace; it is, in form, like one of our field-beds, six feet long and four broad. I counted about a hundred and eight pale rubies in collets about that throne, the least whereof weighed a hundred carats ; but there are some that weigh two hruidred. Emeralds I 256 1 KINGS. Chap. 10. counted about a hundred and forty, that weighed some threescore, some thirty carats. The u^i|yBrpart of the can- opy is entirely embroidered with pearls^d diamonds, with a fringe of pearls round the edge. Upon the top of the canopy, which is made like an arch with four panes, stands a peacock, with his tail spread, consisting entirely of sap- phires, and other proper colaured stones : the body is of beaten gold, enchased with numerous jewels; and a great ruby adorns his breast, to which hangs a pearl that weighs fifcy carats. On each side of the peacock stand two nose- gays, as high as the bird, consisting of various sorts of flowers, all of beaten gold enamelled. When the king seats himself upon the throne, there is a transparent jew^el, - with a diamond appendant, of eighty or ninety carats weight, encompassecf with rubies and emeralds, so sus- pended that it is always in his eye. The twelve pillars also that uphold the canopy are set round with rows of fair pearl, and of an excellent water, that weigh from six to ten carats a piece. At the distance of four feet, upon each side of the throne, are placed two umbrellas, the handles of which are about eight feet high, covered with diamonds ; the umbrellas themselves being of crimson velvet, em- broidered and fringed wdth pearl. This is the famous throne which Timur began, and Shah Johan finished, and is really reported to have cost a hundred and sixty millions and five hundred thousand livres of our money." (Taver- nier.) — Burder, Ver. 21. And all King Solomon's drinking ves- sels were of gold, and all the vessels of the house of the forest of Lebanon were o/pure gold ; none were of silver : it Avas nothing accounted of in the days of Solomon. The magnificence of Solomon, particularly with respect to his drinking vessels, has not been exceeded by modern eastern princes. They were all of gold, and it should .seem of the purest gold, 1 Kings x. 2L The gold plate of the kings of Persia has been extremely celebrated, and is mentioned in Sir J. Chardin's note on this passage of the sacred historian : he observes, that the plate of the king of Persia is of gold, and that very fine, exceeding the standard of ducats, and equal to those of Venice, which are of the purest gold. The vessels of gold, we are told in Olearius, were made by the order of Shah Abbas, esteemed the most glorious of the princes of the Sefi royal family, who died lG-29. It seems that he caused seven thousand two hundred marks of gold to be melted upon this occasion ; that his successors made use of it whenever they feasted strangers; and that it consisted chiefly of dishes, pots, flagons, and other vessels for drinking. A French mark is eight of their ounces, and is but four grains lighter than an English ounce troy. Abbas then melted on this occasion near thirty- six thousand English troy ounces of the purest gold, or al- most forty-one three-fourths Jewish talents. Astonishing magnificence of Persia ! Nor have we reason to think that of Solomon was inferior. We may believe, sure, his royal drinking vessels were of equal weight, w^hen the two him- dred targets Solomon made, I Kings x. IG, weighed but little less than the drinking vessels of Shah Abbas. Sir J. Chardin's way of comparing the glory of Solomon, with that of a most illustrious monarch of Persia of late ages, is perhaps one of the most eflficacious methods of impres- sing the mind with an apprehension of the magnificence of this ancient Israelitish king, and, at the same time, appears to be perfectly just. — Harmer. . Ver. 22. For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish with the navy of Hiram : once in three years came the navy of Tharshish, bring- ing gold and silver, ivory, and apes, and pea- cocks. This beautiful bird, which is now familiarly known to perhaps every nation of Europe, does not seem to have found his way into Palestine before the reign of Solomon. That rich and powerful monarch, added to his unexam- pled wisdom, a taste for natural history; and every three years his fleets returned laden with the most curious and valuable products of distant regions. The elegant shape, the majestic mien, and the splendid plumageof the peacock, rendered him a present not unbefitting the greatest king the world had ever seen ; and the servants of Solomon, stimulated probably not more by a sense of duty, than by ' the inclination to gratify their amiable sovereign, were for- ward to place it under his eye. " For the king had at sea a navy of Tharshish, with the na\7 of Hiram : once in three years came the navy of Tharshish, bringing gold and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks." The Hebrew name oi this bird is (□■'on) thochijivi, which the Greek interpreters, not understanding, left without explanation ; but the Chal- dee, the Syriac, and other translators, render it the peacock. The origin of the Hebrew name is unknown ; and accord- ingly various are the conjectures in which the learned have indulged their imaginations, or critical acumen. Bocbart imagines it is an exotic term ; and changing the Hebrew (niiiin) ihochiji'in hy 'n\Y ersion into (ovmr) cnthijim, he tra- ces it to aCushite root, intended to denote the native coun- try of the peacock. Nor is it uncommon for an animal to de- rive its proper name from the place of its original residence. The pheasant is indebted for her name to the Phasis, a river of Colchus, on the banks of which she first drew the attention of the postdiluvian tribes ; and African and Nu- midian birds are so called from Africa or Numidia, the country where they were hatched, and where they com- monly fixed their abode. On the same principle, the pea- cock himself is everywhere called by the ancients the bird of Media or Persia, in which the land of Gush, or Cuth, was situate, because he came originally from that region. Aristophanes calls the peacock the bird of Persia ; Suidas, the bird of Media ; and Clemens Psedagogus, the bird of India. Diodorus observes, that Babylonia produces a very great number of peacocks marked with colours of every kind. In the opinion of Bochart, India is the true native country of that bird ; but it is frequently mentioned as a native of Persia and Media, because it was first imported from India into these countries, from whence it passed into Judea, Egypt, and Greece, and gradually found its w^ay into the other parts of the globe. Hence the peacocks, which were imported in the 'fleet of Solomon, probably came from Persia; for in that long voyage of three years, in w^hich they visited Taprobane, it is by no means probable they would always pursue a direct couYse ; but along the vari- ous windings of the coast, search for any thing that suited their purpose. It is even probable that they sailed up the Persian gulf, and touched at the renowned isles of the Pha-nicians, Tyrus or Tylus, and Aradiis, at no great dis- tance from Persia. The elegance of the peacock's form, and the brilliancy of his plumage, seem to be the principal reasons which indu- ced the mariners of Solomon to bring him into Palestine, and that the sacred historian so distinctly mentions the circumstance. Nature, according to the remark of Var- ro, has certainly assigned the pahn of beauty to the pea- cock ; but since the introduction of the ape into Palestine, an animal neither distinguished by the elegance of his form, nor the brilliancy of his colour, is mentioned at the same time, the historian might intend to direct the reader's attention, as well to the riches and splendour of Solo- mon, as to his taste for rare and curious articles of natural history. In the Lesser Asia, and in Greece, the peacock was long held in high estimation, and frequently purchased by the great and the wealthy, at a very great price. We learn from Plutarch, that in the age of Pericles, a person at Athens made a great fortune by rearing these birds, and showing them to the public, at a certain price, every new moon ; and to this exhibition, the curious Greeks crowded from the remotest parts of the country. The keeper of these birds, the same author informs us, sold a male and female for a thousand drachms, about thirty-six pounds of our money. Peacocks were very rare in Greece, even in the time of Alexander, who, by the testimony of ./Elian, was struck with astonishment at the sight of these birds on the banks of the Indus ; and from admiration of their beauty, commanded every person that killed one of them, to be severely punished. At Rome, as the same historian relates, when Hortensius first killed one for supper, he was brought to trial, and condemned to pay a fine. Their eggs, according to Varro, w ere sold in his time at five denarii, or more than three shillings a piece ; and the birds ihem- selv-es commonly at about two pounds of our money. The same writer aflirms, that M. A ufidius Luzco derived an Chap. 10—12. I KINGS. 257 vearly revenue of more than sixty thousand pieces of silver, which amounts to four hundred and sixty-eight pounds fifteen shillings sterling, from the sale of peacocks; for al- though their flesh is not better tasted than that of a domestic fowl, they were sold at a much greater price on account of the richness and brilliancy of their plumes. These state- ments prove, that the peacock was deemed, in remote ages, a present not unworthy of a king. — Paxton. The last word D'^on tmkkiyeem, of those paragraphs which ■describe the imports of Solomon's navy from Tharshish, is dubious : some of the learned have thought it means parrots, the greatest number, peacocks. What led some of the curi- ous to imagine parrots were meant, I do not well know ; but there is a passage in Hasselquist, which strongly in- clines me to adopt their sentiment; describing the com- merce of the people of Ethiopia, he says, the Abyssinians make a journey every year to Cairo, to sell the products of their country, slaves, gold, elephants, drugs, monkeys, parrots, &c. As Solomon's navy is said to have brought gold and silver, elephants' teeth, and apes, and peacocks, and this by the way of the Red Sea, 1 Kings ix. 26, which washes the east of Abyssinia, one would imagine, as many of the other particulars tally with each other, that instead of peacocks^ the true translation of the last word is parrots. Religion indeed is not at all concerned in this uncertainty ; but it is a matter of curiosity, and as such may, with great propriety, be taken notice of in these papers. — Harmer. Ver. 28. And Solomon had horses brought out of Egypt, and linen yarn : the king's merchants received the linen yarn at a price. Horses were conducted to foreign markets in strings ; a circumstance " favourable to those interpreters, who would refer the whole passage, 1 Kings x. 28, and 2 Chron. i. 16, to /lorses, instead of linen yarn, which seems rather to break the connexion of the verses." Some are therefore inclined to read, " And Solomon had horses brought out of Egypt, even strings of horses, (literally, draioings out— prolonga- tions:) the king's merchants received the strings, i.e. of horses, in commutation, exchange, or barter. And a chariot, or set of chariot horses, {i. e. four,) came up from Egypt for six hundred shekels of silver, and a single horse for one hundred and fifty." — And these he sold again, at a great profit, to the neighbouring kings. As the whole con- text seems rather applicable to horses than to linen yarn, so this idea, while it strictly maintains the import of the words, preserves the unity of the passage. The Egyptian horses were held in great estimation in Syria .and the neighbouring countries. The breed seems to have been introduced into Egypt at a very remote period ; for the cavalry of Pharaoh was numerous and completely trained to war, when the people of Israel were delivered from his yoke : " But the Egyptians pursued after them, all the horses and chariots of Pharaoh, and his horsemen, and his army, and overtook them encamping by the sea." The dreadful overthrow which Pharaoh received at the Red Sea, did not prevent his successors from again directing their attention to the rearing of horses for the purpose of war : for the numerous and splendid studs of Solomon were chiefly formed of Egyptian horses ; and in the fifth year of his son Rehoboam, Shishak, king of Egypt, invaded Canaan "with twelve hundred chariots, and threescore thousand horsemen." In times long posterior, the prophet Jeremiah addressed the forces of Pharaoh Neco, which the king of Babylon routed near the Euphrates, in these words : " Harness the horses ; and get up, ye horsemen, and stand forth with your helmets. — Come up, ye horses ; and rage, ye chariots ; and let the mighty men come forth." From these passages, it may be certainly inferred, that the strength of the Egyptian armies chiefly consisted in cavalry and chari- ots of war. The Egyptian warrior adorned the neck of his charger with small bells, which were of great use when he had to engage with enemies mounted on camels, the noise of which these animals cannot endure. In allusion to this custom, which was probably adopted by Solomon, who delighted so much in pomp and show, it is promised, "upon the bells of the horses shall be written, Holiness to the Lord." The Egyptian horses appear to have been much stronger than the Syrian breed, and by consequence, much more useful in the field. On this account, the prophet Isaiah tells the people of Israel, that " the Egyptians were men, and not God, and their horses were flesh, and not spirit." The high estimation in which the Egyptian horses were held, and the eagerness with which the surrounding nations purchased them at exorbitant prices, might be one reason for enacting the law which forbade the chosen people to multiply horses, that they might not idly waste their substance, and especially, that they might not return again into Egypt, the scene of their grievous oppression, even for the purposes of commerce. — Paxton. CHAPTER XI. Ver. 36. And unto his son will I give one tribe, that David my servant may have a light ahvays before me in Jerusalem, the city which I have chosen me to put my name there. The houses in the East were, from the remotest antiquity, lighted with lamps ; and hence it is so common in scrip- ture to call everything which enlightens the body or mind, which guides or refreshes, by the name of a lanip. These lamps were sustained by a large candlestick set upon the ground. The houses of Egypt, in modern times, are never without lights ; they burn lamps all the night long, and in every occupied apartment. So requisite to the comfort of a family is this custom reckoned, or so imperious is the power which it exercises, that the poorest people would rather retrench part of their food than neglect it. If this custom prevailed in Eg>'pt and the adjacent regions of Arabia and Palestine in former times, it will impart a beauty and force to some passages of scripture, which have been little observed. Thus, in the language of Jeremiah, to extinguish the light in an apartment is a convertible Jhrase for total destruction ; and if it was the practice in udea,asin modem Egypt, which can scarcely be doubted, to keep a lamp continually burning in an occupied apart- ment, nothing can more properly and emphatically repre- sent the total destruction of a city, than the extinction of the lights. " 1 will take from them the light of a candle; and this whole land shall be a desolation and an astonish- ment." Job describes the destruction of a family among the Arabs, and the desolation of their dwellings, in the very language of the prophet : " How oft is the candle of the wicked put out, and how oft cometh their destruction upon them!" Bildad expresses the same idea, in the following beautiful passage : " Yea, the light of the wicked shall be put out, and the spark of his fire shall not shine." " The light shall be dark in his tabernacle, and his candle shall be put out with him." A burning lamp is, on the other hand, the chosen symbol of prosperity, a beautiful instance of which occurs in the complaint of Job: "Oh that I were as in months past, as in the days when God preserved me, when his candle shined upon my head, and when by his light I walked through darkness." When the ten tribes were taken from Rehoboam, and given to his rival, Jeho- vah promised to reserve one tribe, and assigns this reason , "that David my servant may have a light always before me in Jerusalem."— Paxton. CHAPTER XII. Ver. 11. And now whereas my father did lade you with a heavy yoke, I will add to your yoke : my father hath chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions. It is not easy to know which to admire most, the folly or the tyranny of Rehoboam, who in the very commencement of his reign, threatened to lay aside the whips with which his father had chastised the people of Israel, and rule them with scorpions ; it was adding insult to cruelty. Nor is the injurious treatment much alleviated, although the idea of some interpreters were admitted, that the scorpion was the name of a kind of whip in use among the Jews, armed with points like the tail of that animal. The sting of the scorpion occasioned an excruciating pain, although death did not ensue. This is attested by John, in the book of Revelation : "And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months; and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion, when he striketh a man." And so intolerable is the agony, that it is added, " In those days shall men seek death, and shall 253 1 KINGS Chap. 13. not find it j and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them." If the Jews used a whip which they called a scor- pion, it must have been because it occasioned a similar tor- ment. If these things are properly considered, we shall cease to wonder at the instantaneous revolt of the ten tribes ; for it is not easy to conceive an address more cal- culated to rouse and exasperate the bitter passions of a high- spirited people, than the puerile and wicked speech of Rehoboam.— Paxton. CHAPTER XIII. Ver. 2. And he cried against the altar in the word of the Lord, and said, O altar, altar, thus saith the Lord, Behold, a child shall be born unto the house of David, Josiah by name ; and upon thee shall he offer the priests of the high places that burn incense upon thee, and men's bones shall be burnt upon thee. These words were uttered in consequence of the profana- tion of the altar, and the wickedness of those concerned. Has a man brought or purchased a kid for sacrifice to his deity, and should it have been stolen, he goes to his god to tell his story, and then says, " O Swamy ! may the bones and the body of him who stole the kid intended for you, be offered up to you as a sacrifice." Whoever walks upon ihe place where men's bones have been burnt, becomes im- pure. — Roberts. Ver. 6. And the king answered and said unto the man of God, Entreat now the face of the Lord thy God, and pray for me, that my hand may be restored me again. And the man of God besought the Lord, and the king's hand was restored him again, and became as it was before. This is said in reference to the hand of Jeroboam, which had become stiff in consequence of the violence he had offered to the prophet. The face of the Lord was to be entreated. Has a man injured another, he says, " Ah ! my lord, forgive me for the sake of the face of your son." Or, does he wish another to intercede for him, he says, " Ah ! go, and beseech his face for me." A man, whose name was Veatha-Veydthar, was once asked by some prophet, " Who is the greatest god, Siva or Vishnoo '?" The man then stretched forth his hand towards a temple of Vishnoo, and said, " He is the greatest." Immediately his arm became stiff and withered. The prophet, seeing this, then prayed to Siva, and his hand was restored. — Roberts, Ver. 31. And it came to pass, after he had buried him, that he spake to his sons, saying, When I am dead, then bury me in the sepulchre wherein the man of God is buried ; lay my bones beside his bones. His object in making this request, was no doubt a selfish one; he believed the deceased was a good man, and felt a hope, that if his body were to rest near him it would be protected from insult, and that with him he would share the blessings of the resurrection. Wherever the body or the bones of Hindoo or Mohammedan saints are buried, there will others also wish to be interred. Often, when men think themselves near death, they say, " Take care that you bury me near ' .e holy man. Ah ! remember you are to put me near to * -e sacred place." The idea seems to be, that the spot beiT < thus sanctified, neither devils nor evil spirits can injure them. Numbers are carried to a great distance to be thus interred. — Roberts, Not far from this is another large mausoleum, built by Shah Suleiman, over the remains of a mussulman doctor of the name of Mollah Hossein, who was a native of Con- sori, a large town of Irak Ajem, three days' journey from Ispahan. Around these and such like monuments are, in general, to be seen collections of minor tombs ; for it is a received opinion, that those who are buried in the vicinity of a holy personage will meet with his support at the day of resurrection. — Morier. Ver. 32. For the saymg which he cried by the word of the Lord against the altar in Bethel, and against all the houses of the high places which are in the cities of Samaria, shal surely come to pass. Leaving Nablous, the road lies along the narrow vale, and, in about three quarters of an hour, conducts the trav- eller to a copious spring of good water, called Beersheba. This, Dr. Richardson says, is the broadest and best culti- vated part of the valley ; he saw the natives busily engaged (May) in reaping a scanty crop of barley. Maundrell notices a village on the left of the road (going northward) called Barseba, deriving its name, no doubt, from this well ; and, half an hour farther, another village, which he calls Sherack. After leaving Beersheba, Dr. Richardson's ac- count makes the road ascend. " In about a quarter of an hour," he says, " we reached the top of the hill ; and as we wound our way down the other side, had an excellent view of the delightfully situated Sebaste. In a few minutes we passed a ruined aqueduct of Roman architecture, and pitched our tents at the bottom of the hill, nearly opposite to its unworthy successor, a poor village of the same name ; having travelled this day about nine hours." This makes the distance from Khan Leban about twenty-seven miles, but allowing for deviations from the direct track, twenty- four miles, and sixteen hours, or forty-eight miles from Jerusalem. Josephus, however, makes it but one day's journey from the capital. It is six miles beyond Napolose; and if the distance of the latter place is correctly given by our authorities, it cannot exceed forty miles. Sebaste is the name which Herod gave to the ancient Samaria, the impe- rial city of the ten tribes, in honour of Augustus (Sebastos) Cesar, when he rebuilt and fortified it, converting the greater part of it into a citadel, and erecting here a ncble temple. "The situation," says Dr. Richardson, "is ex- tremely beautiful, and strong by nature ; more so. I think, than Jerusalem. It stands on a fine, large, insulated hill, compassed all around by a broad deep valley, and when fortified, as it^ is stated to have been by Herod, one would have imagined that, in the ancient system of warfare, nothing but famine could have reduced such a place. The valley is surrounded by four hills, one on each side, which are cultivated in terraces up to the top, sown with grain, and planted with fig and olive trees, as is also the valley. The hill of Samaria likewise rises in terraces to a height equal to any of the adjoining mountains. The present vil- lage is small and poor, and, after passing the valley, the ascent to it is very steep. Viewed from the station of oui tents, it is extremely interesting, both from its natural situ- ation, and from the picturesque remains of a ruined convent of good Gothic architecture. " Having passed the village, towards the middle of the first terrace, there is a number of columns still standing. I counted twelve in one row, besides several that stood apart, the brotherless remains of other rows. The situation. is extremely delightful, and my guide informed me, that they belonged to the serai, or palace. On the next terrace there are no remains of solid building, but heaps of stone, and lime, and rubbish, mixed with soil, in great profusion. Ascending to the third or highest terrace, the traces of former buildings Avere not so numerous, but we enjoyed a delightful view of the surrounding country. The eye passed over the deep valley that encompasses the hill of Sebaste, and rested on the mountains beyond, that retreated as they rose with a gentle slope, and met the view in every direc- tion, like a book laid out for perusal on a reading-desk. This -^'as the seat of the capital of the short-lived and wicked kingdom of Israel ; and on the face of these mount- ains the eye surveys the scene of many bloody conflicts and many memorable events. Here those holy meft oi God, Elijah and Elisha, spoke their tremendous warnirgs in the ears of their incorrigible rulers, and wrought their miracles in the sight of all the people. From this lofiy eminence we descended to the south side of the hill, where we saw the remains of a stately colonnade, that stretches along this beautiful exposure from west to east. Sixty columns are still standing in one row. The shafts are plain, and fragments of Ionic volutes, that lie scattered about, tes- tify the order to which they belonged. These are probably the relics of some of the magnificent structures with whick Chap. 14. 1 KINGS. 259 Herod the Great adorned Samaria. None of the walls remain." Mr. Buckingham mentions a current tradition, that the avenue of columns formed a part of Herod's palace. According to his account there were eighty-three of these columns erect in 1816, besides others prostrate; all without capitals. Josephus states, that, about the middle of the city, Herod built " a sacred place, of a furlong and a half in circuit, and adorned it with all sorts of decorations ; and therein erected a temple, illustrious for both its largeness and beauty," It is probable that these columns belonged to it. On the eastern side of the same summit are the remains, Mr. Buckmgham states, of another building, " of which eight large and eight small columns are still standing, with many o hers fallen near them. These also are without capitals, and are of a smaller size, and of an inferior stone to the others." " In the walls of the humble dwellings forming the modern village, portions of sculptured blocks of stone are perceived, and even fragments of granite pil- lars have been worked into the masonry." The Gothic convent refi'rred to by Dr. Richardson, is the ruined cathe- dral, attributed, like every thing else of the kind in Pales- tine, to the Empress Helena. It stands east and west, and is about one hundred feet in length, by fifty in breadth. — Modern Traveller. > CHAPTER XIV. Ver. 3. And take with thee ten loaves, and crack- nels, and a cruise of honey, and go to him : he shall tell thee what shall become of the child. When they consulted a prophet, the eastern modes re- quired a present ; and they might think it was right rather to present him with eatables than other things, because it frequently happened that they were detained some time, waiting the answer of God, dtring which hospitality would require the prophet to ask them to take some repast with him. And as the prophet would naturally treat them with some regard to their quality, they doubtless did then, as the Egyptians do now, proportion their presents to their avowed rank and number of attendants. " This custom," (of making presents,) says Maillet, " is principally observed in the fre- quent visits which they make one another through the course of the year, which are always preceded by presents of fowls, sheep, rice, coffee, and other provisions of different kinds. These visits, which relations and friends make regularly to each other, were in use among the ancient Egyptians ; and though they are often made without going out of the same city, yet they never fail of lasting three or four days, and sometimes eight. They carry all their family with them, if they have any ; and the custom is, as I have just observed, to send presents beforehand, proportionable to their rank, and the number of their attendants." In other cases, the presents that anciently were, and of late have been made to personages eminent for study and piety, were large sums of money or vestments. Sums of money are presented also to others, by princes and great personages. Sir John Chardin observes, in his MS., on occasion of Joseph's being said to have given Benjamin three hundred pieces of silver. Gen. xlv. 22, that the kings of Asia almost always make presents of this kind to ambassadors, and other strangers of consid- eration who have brought them presents. So the Calif Mahadi, according to D'Herbelot, gave an Arab that had entertained him in the desert, a vest and a purse of silver: as to vestments, D'Herbelot tells us, that Bokhteri, an illus- trious poet of Cufah, in the ninth century, had so many presents made him in the course of his life, that at his death he was found possessed of a hundred complete suits of clothes, two hundred shirts, and five hundred turbans. D'Arvieux tells us, that when he waited on an Arab emir, his mother and sister, to gratify whose curiosity that visit was made, sent him, early in the morning after his H arrival in their camp, a present of pastry, honey, fresh butter, with a basin of sweetmeats of Damascus. Sir John Chardin tells us, in his Travels, of an officer whose busi- ness it was to register the presents that were made to his master or mistress ; and I have since found the same prac- tice obtains at the Ottoman court: for Egmont and Heyman, speaking of the presents made there on the account of the circumcision of the grand seignior's children, tell us that all these donations with the time when, and on what occasion given, were carefully registered in a book for that purpose. When Dr. Perry travelled in Egypt, ahd visited the trmple at Luxor, he says, " We were entertained by the calif here with great marks of civility and favour ; he sent us, in return of our presents, several sheep, a good quantity of eggs, bardacks," &c. These bardacks he had described a little before, in speaking of a town called Keene: " Its chief manufactory," he there tells us, " is in bardacks, to cocl and refresh their water in, by means of which it drinks very cool and pleasant in the hottest seasons of the year. They make an inconceivable quantity of these, which they distribute to Cairo, and all other parts of Egypt. They send them down in great floats, consisting of many thou- sands, lashed together in such a manner as to bear the weight of several people upon them. We purchased a good many of them for the fancy, at so inconsiderable a Erice as twenty pence a hundred; and are really surprised ow they could make them for it." — Burder. The presents made to the ancient prophets were not always of the same kind and value; an inhabitant of Baal- shalisha "brought the man of God bread of the first-fruits, twenty loaves of barley, and full ears of corn in the husk." The king of Israel sent a present by his wife to the prophet Ahijah, of ten loaves, and cracknels, and a cruise of honey; which, it appears from other statements, was not deemed unworthy of an eastern king. Some commentators are of opinion, that it was a present fit only for a peasant to make, and was designedly of so small value, to conceal the rank of the messenger. But this idea by no means corresponds with the custom of the East ; for D'Arvieux informs us, that when he waited on an Arabian emir, his mother and sister sent him a present of pastry, honey, fresh butter, with a basin of sweetmeats, which differs very little from the present of Jeroboam. It was certainly the wish of the king, that his wife should not be recognised by the aged. pro|)het ; but the present she carried, though not intended to discover her, was, in the estimation of the Orientals, not unbecoming her rank and condition. — Paxton. Travellers agree that the eastern bread is made in small, thin moist cakes, must be eaten new, and is good for nothing when kept longer than a day. This, however, admits of exceptions. Dr. Russel of late, and Rauw^olf formerly, assure us, that they have several sorts of bread and cakes. Some, Rauwolf tells us, done with yelk of eggs, some mix- ed with several sorts of seeds, as of sesamum, Romish co- riander, and wild garden saffron, which are also strewed upon it : and he elsewhere supposes that they prepare bis- cuits for travelling. Russel also mentions this strewing of seeds on their cakes, and says they have a variety vf rusks and biscuits. To these authors let me add Pitts, who tells us, the biscuits they carry with them from Egypt will last them to Mecca and back again. So the scripture supposes their loaves of bread were very small, three of them being requisite for the entertainment of a single per- son, Luke xi. 5 ; that they were generally eaten new, and baked as they wanted them, as appears from the case of Abraham ; that sometimes, however, they were made so as to keep several days; so the shew-bread was fit food after having stood before the Lord a week. And that bread for travellers was wont to be made to keep some time, ap- pears from the pretences of the Gibeonites, Josh. ix. 12 ; and the preparations Joseph made for Jacob's journey into Egypt, Gen. xlv. 23. In like manner, too, they seem to have had then a variety of eatables of this kind, as the Alep- pines now have. In particular, some made like those on which seeds are strewed, as we may collect from that part of the present of Jeroboam's wife to the prophet Ahijah, which our translators have rendered cracknels, 1 Kings xiv. iii. Buxtorf indeed supposes the original word onpj nak- kadeem, signifies biscuits, called by this name either because they were formed into little buttons like some of our ginger- bread, or because they were pricked full of holes after a par- ticularmanner. The last of these two conjectures, I imagine, was embraced by our translators of this passage, for cracJ/- neh, as they are all over England of the same form, are full of holes, being formed into a kind of flourish of lattice- work. I have seen some of the unleavened bread of our English Jews, made in like manner, in a net-work form. Nevertheless, I think it more natural to undierstand the word of biscuits spotted with seeds ; for it is used elsewhere to signify works of gold spotted with studs of silver; and, as it should seem, bread spotted with mould. Josh. ix. 5 — 12 ; how much more natural then is it to understand the word < 260 1 KINGS. Chap. 15. of cakes spotted with seeds, which are so common, that not only Rauwolf and Russel speak of them at Aleppo, but Han way tells us, too, that the cakes of bread that were pre- sented to him at the house of a Persian of distinction, were in like manner sprinkled with the seeds of poppies and other things, than of cracknels, on account of their being full of holes. It is used for things that are spotted we know, never in any other place for a thing full of holes. Our translators then do not appear to have been very happy in the choice of the word cracknels here. — Harmer. Ver. 6. And it was so, when Ahijah heard the sound of her feet, as she came in at the door, that he said. Come in, thou wife of Jeroboam ; why feignest thou thyself to be another ? for 1 a?n §ent to thee with heavy tidings. This woman disguised herself in order to deceive the prophet, and therefore he addressed her by name, to show that she was known to him. Married women are general- ly spoken to as the wife of such a person. Supposing a married female to be in a crowd, and a man on the outside wishes to speak to her, he will say, " Come hither, wife of Chinne Tamby ;" literally, Chinne Tamby's wife, hither come. " O ! Muttoo's wife, where are you V Should a Eerson have to speak to a female who is walking before im, he will not call her by name, but address her, " Such a one's wife, I wish to speak to you."— Roberts. Ver. 10. Therefore, behold, I will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam, and will cut off from Jeroboam him that pisseth against the wall, and him that is shut up, and left in Israel, and will take away the remnant of the house of Jeroboam, as a man taketh away dung, till it be all gone. Sometimes, when a successful prince has endeavoured to extirpate the preceding royal family, some of them have escaped the slaughter, and secured themselves in a fortress or place of secrecy, while others have sought an asylum in foreign countries, from whence they have occasioned great anxiety to the usurper. The word shut up, strictly speak- ing, refers to the first of these cases ; as in the preservation of Joash from Athaliah in a private apartment of the tem- ple. Such appears also to have been the case in more mod- ern times. '• Though more than thirty years had elapsed since the death of the Sultan Achmet, father of the new emperor, he had not, in that interval, acquired any great information or improvement. Shut up during this long in- terval in the apartment assigned him, with some eunuchs to wait on him, the equality of his age with that of the prin- ces who had a right to precede him, allowed him but little hope of reigning in his turn ; and he had, besides, well- grounded reasons for a more serious uneasiness." (Baron De Tott.) But when David was in danger, he kept himself close in Ziklag, but not so as to prevent him from making frequent excursions. In latter times, in the East, persons of royal descent have been left, when the rest of a family have been cut off, if no danger was apprehended from them, on account of some mental or bodily disqualification. Blind- ness saved the life of Mohammed Khodabendeh, a Persian prince of the sixteenth century, when his brother Ismael put all the rest of his brethren to death. —Harmer. We find divine anger threatening to " cut off from Jero- boam him who is shut up and left in Israel," 1 Kings xiv. 10. In chap. xxi. 21, the same threat is made against Ahab; vide also 2 Kings ix. 8. This shutting up of the royal family appears sufliciently strange to us ; and the rather as we perceive that the sons of David the king enjoyed liberty sufficient, and more than sufficient. The following extracts will throw some light on this subject: " In one of them we find the royal family dwelling together on a 'mountain, which, though a place of confinement, yet had some ex- tent. In the other, we find them in a palace, which only in name differed from a prison. The crown being heredi- tary in one family, but elective in the person, and polyg- amy being permitted, must have multiplied these heirs very much, and produced "onstant disputes; so that it was found necessary to provide a remedy for the anarchy and ef- fusion of royal blood, which was otherwise inevitably to follow. The remedy was a humane and gentle one; they were confined in a good climate upon a high mountain, and maintained there at the public expense. They are there taught to read and write, but nothing else; 750 cloths for wrapping round them ; 3000 ounces of gold, which is 30,000 dollars, or crowns, are allowed by the state for their main- tenance. These princes are hardly used, and, in troublous times, often put to death upon the smallest misinformation. While I was at Abyssinia, their revenue M^as so grossly misapplied, that some of them were said to have died witK hunger and of cold, by the avarice and hard-heartedness of Michael neglecting to furnish them necessaries. Nor had the king, as far as I could discern, that fellow-feeling one would have expected from a prince rescued from that very situation himself Perhaps this was owing to his fear of Ras Michael. " However that be, and however distressing the situation of those princes, we cannot but be satisfied with it, when we look to the neighbouring kingdom of Sennaar or Nubia. There no mountain is trusted with the confinement of their princes, but as soon as the father dies, the throats of all the collaterals, and all their descendants that can be laidhold of, are cut; and this is the case with all the black states in the desert west of Sennaar, Dar Four, Sele, and Bagirma." (Bruce.) We see now how Athaliah might destroy, not merely an individual, but all the seed royal, (2 Kings 'xi. 1,) because, if she found access to the palace to accomplish the slaughter of any one, she might easily cut off the whole. This also renders credible the slaughter of Ahab's sons, seventy young persons at one time. They were kept shut up, it seems, in Samaria, where their keepers became their destro)rers. How far the same confinement might take place in the instance of the sons of Gideon, (Judges ix. 2, 5,) we cannot determine ; but it should appear, that at least they were kept in one place of abode, whether that place were the mansion or the tower of their father. — Taylor in Calmet. CHAPTER XV. Ver. 2. Three years reigned he in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Maachah, the daughter of Abishalom. ^ It has been conjectured by Mr. Baruh, that the phrase, *' and his mother's name was," &c. when expressed on a king's accession to the throne, at the beginning of his his- tory, does not always refer to his natural mother, but that it is a title of honour and dignity, enjoyed by one of the royal family, denoting her to be the first in rank. This idea appears we'll founded from the following extracts: "The Oloo Kani is not govei'ness of the Crimea. This title, the literal translation of which is, great queen, simply denotes a dignity in the harem, which the khan usually confers on one of his sisters; or if he has none, on one of his davigh- ters, or relations. To this dignity are attached the revenues arising from several villages, and other rights." (Baron De Tott.) " On this occasion the king crowned his moth- er Malacotawit, conferring upon her the dignity and title of iteghe, i. e. as king's mother, regent and governess of the king when under age." (Bruce's Travels.)— Burder. Ver. 18. And King Asa sent them to Ben-hadad, the son of Tabrimon, the son of Hezion, king of Syria, that dwelt at Damascus, saying, 19. There is a league between me and thee, and between my father and thy father : behold, I have sent unto thee a present of silver and gold ; come and break thy league with Baasha, king of Israel, that he may depart from me. I will not push my remarks on the presents of the East any further here, excepting the making this single obser- vation more, that the sending presents to princes to induce them to help the distressed, has been practised in these countries in late times, as well as in the days of Asa, of whom we read, that he " took all the silver and the gold that were left in the treasures of the house of the Lord, and the treasures of the king's house, and delivered them into the hand of his servants: and king Asa sent them to Benha- Chap. 16. 17. 1 KINGS, 261' dad the son of Tabrimon, the son of Hezion, king of Syria, that dwelt at Damascus, saying, There is a league between me and thee, and between my father and thy father: behold, I have sent unto thee a present of silver and gold; come and break thy league with Baasha, king of Israel, that he may depart from me." To us it appears strange, that a present should be thought capable of inducing one prince to break with another, and engage himself in war ; but as it was anciently thought sufficient, so we find in the Gesta Dei per Francos, that an eastern nobleman, that had the custody of a castle called Hasarth, quarrelling with his master, the prince of Aleppo, and finding himself obliged to seek for foreign aid, sent presents to Godfrey of Bouillon, to induce him to assist him. What they were we are not told: but gold and silver, the things Asa sent Benhadad, were frequently sent in those times to the crusade princes, and might probably be sent on this occasion to'Godfrey. — Harmer. CHAPTER XVI. Ver. 34. In his days did Hiel the Bethelite build Jericho : he laid the foundation thereof in Abi- ram his first-born, and set up the gates thereof in his youngest so7i Segub, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake by Joshua the son of Nun. See on Judges 11. 30, 31. CHAPTER XVII. Ver. 1.. And Elijah the Tishbite, who was of the inhabitants of Gilead, said unto Ahab, As the Lord God of Israel liveth, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, but according to my word. The latter rain falls in the middle or towards the end of April, from which, if there be three months to the harvest, j as the prophet asserts, it ftiust fall in the middle or towards the end of July. But at present in Syria, barley-harvest commences about the beginning of May, and that, as well as the wheat-harvest, is finished by the twentieth of the same month. In Judea the harvest is still more early. The rain, therefore, which God threatens to withhold from his people, must have commonly fallen in the first part of Feb- 1 ruary. That a quantity of snow descends at Jerusalem at this time, which is of great importance to the succeeding ,; harvest, by making the fountains to overflow a little afler- |; ward, is confirmed by the authority of Dr. Shaw. It is no ^! real objection to this view, that the prophet threatens to ; withhold the rain; for the great difference of temperature , Id Palestine, may be the cause that it snows in the mount- ainous districts, while it rains in other parts of the sailie country. By the moderate quantity of rain or snow which falls in the month of February, the reservoirs of water on which the cities of Palestine chiefly depend, are filled, and the prospect of a fruitful and plentiful year is opened. Of i so great importance to the subsistence and comfort of that people are these rains, that upon their descent, they make siiiiilar rejoicings with the Egyptians upon the cutting of the Nile. The prophet evidently refers to both these cir- cu instances; to the succeeding harvest, in these words: " the piece or field upon which it rained not, withered ;" to the state of the cisterns in these : " so two or three cities wandered into one city to drink water, but they were not satisfied." Hence, Mr, Harmer, who treats Jerome on this occasion with undue severity, is wrong in supposing that the inspired writer refers to the single circumstance of fill- '. ing their cisterns with water. He refers to both, and this i Jerome distinctly notices : " God suspended the rain," says that father, " not only to punish them with want of bread, but also wiih thirst ; for in those countries in which they then resided, excepting a few fountains, they had only cistern- ' water ; so that if the divine anger suspended the rains, there was more danger of perishing by thirst than by famine." Terome certainly committed a mistake when he referred the words of Amos to the latter rain ; but he understood as certainlv the true extent of the threatening. The former and the latter rains were, in the days of Eli- jah, suspended for t.iree years and six months. But when the prophet said to 'Ahab, " As the Lord God of Israel liv- eth, betbre whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years,, but according to my word ;" he could not mean, there shall be no rain at all for three years ; for long before their termination, the whole population of Israel must have miserably perished. It is not uncommon among the Ori- entals, to express a great deficiency by an absolute nega- tive. Thus Philo affirms, that in Egypt they have no win- ter ; by which, according to his own explanation, he meant no hail, no thunder, no violent storms of wind, which con- stitute an eastern winter. Pliny in like manner affirms there are no rains, no thunders, no earthquakes in that country ; while Maillet, who quotes him, asserts that he had seen it rain there several times, and that there were two earthquakes in Egypt during his residence. His idea therefore, is very plausible, that Pliny meant only to state the rare occurrence of these phenomena ; that it seldom feels the power of the earthquake, and when it does, sutTers but little damage; that it very seldom rains or thtmders, al- though on the seacoast the rains and thunders are often very violent ; but it does not rain there as in other parts ot the world. This account of the rain of Egypt is confirmed by the testimony of two English travellers. When Pitts was at Cairo, the rain descended in torrents, and the streets having no kennels to carry off' the water, it reached above the ankles, and in some places much higher. In Upper Egypt it rained and hailed almost a whole morning, when Dr. Pococke was there in the month of February ; and the following night it also rained very hard. These authentic statements unfold thej.rue meaning of the prophet's asser- tion, " that Egypt has no rain ;" he must be understood in the same qualified sense as Pliny and other writers. In the same manner, the words of Elijah to Ahab must be in- terpreted; they only mean, that the dew and the rain should not fall in the usual and necessary quantities. Such a suspension of rain and dew was sufficient to answer the corrective purposes of God, while an absolute drought of three years' continuance, must have converted the whole country into an uninhabitable Avaste. But such a destruc- tion is not intimated in the scriptures ; and, we may con- clude from the inspired narrative, did not take place. ' That guilty people were certainly reduced in the righteous judgments of God to great straits ; but still they were able to subsist until his fierce anger passed away, and mercy re- turned to bless their afflicted habitations. — Paxton. Ver. 4. And it shall be, that thou shalt drink of the brook ; and I have commanded the ravens to feed thee there. It is a singular circumstance, that the raven, an unclean bird, and one too of very gross and impure dispositions, was chosen by Jehovah to provide for his servant Elijah, when he concealed himself, by the divine command, from the fury of Ahab. So improbable is the story in the eat of reason, that morose and voracious ravens should be- come caterers for the prophet, that some interpreters have maintained that the origmal word denotes merchants or Arabians, or the inhabitants of the city Arbo : according to this interpretation,,the promise would run, " I have com- manded the Arabs, or Ihe Orebim, to nourish thee." But it is easy to show that these opinions have no foundation in scripttire and reason. The prophet Ezekiel indeed de- scribes the merchants of Tyre by the phrase (l^'^yn oiy) arbi mearobeha, " thy merchants who transact thy busi- ness;" but the word ore^m, (o'^^'^y) by itself, never sig- nifies merchants. Nor had God said in general, I have commanded the merchants, but I have commanded the merchants of this or that place, to nourish thee. The situa- tion of the place in which the miracle happened, refutes the other opinions ; for in the neighbourhood of Jordan, where Elijah concealed himself, were no Arabs, no Orebim, and no city which bore the name of Arbo. Besides, the Arabs are not called in Hebrew (Di3->y) orebim, but (c^ij.) arbim, and the inhabitants of Arbo, if any city of that name existed, according to the genius of the Hebrew lan- guage, must have been called (a-iisiy) arabojim, not orebim. Add to this, Elijah was commanded to hide himself there; but how could he hide himself, if the inhabitants of the city or encampment knew of his retreat, as they must have done, if his daily subsistence depended upon their bounty. The place of his retreat must have been discovered in a 262 1 KINGS. Chap. 17. very short time to Ahab, who sought him with g eat in- dusti y in every direction. The solemn declaration c f Oba- diah to the prophet, when he went by the divine command to show himself to the king, proves how impossible it was Tor him to remain concealed in the inhabited part of the country : " As the Lord thy God liveth, there is no nation or kingdom whither my lord hath not sent to seek thee ; and when they said. He is not there, he took an oath of the kingdom and' nation, that they found thee not." Hence these /uj^reim were not merchants, nor human beings of any station or employment, but true ravens; and so the term has been rendered by the whole Christian church, and by many Jewish writers, particularly by their celebrated historian, Josephus. These voracious and impure animals received a com- mandment from their Maker to provide for his prophet by the brook Cherith, near its confluence with the Jordan. The record is couched in these terms : " Get thee hence and turn thee eastward, and hide thyself by the brook Cherith, that is before Jordan: and it shall be that thou shalt drink of the brook; and I have commanded the ra- vens to feed thee there." In the history of providence, such commands are by no means uncommon : the locust, the serpent, and the fishes of the sea, have all in their turn received the charge to do the will of iheir Almighty Crea- tor. Thus he promised to Solomon at the dedication of the temple: " It I command the locusts to devour the land — if my people, which are called by my name, shall hum- ble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wickedness ; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." The marine serpent that lurks in the deepest caverns of the ocean, in like manner hears his voice, and submits to his authority ; for Jehovah directed the prophet to address his guilty coun- trymen in these memorable terms : " Though they be hid from my sight in the bottom of the sea, thence will I com- mand the serpent, and he shall bite them." Nor was the great fish which he prepared to swallow up the refractory prophet, less prompt in its obedience : " And the Lord spaiT! unto the fish, and it vomited out Jonah upon the dry lajid '' His providence extends its powerful influence even to Jianimate objects : " I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their hosts have I commanded." And David, in the Spirit, complained of his ancestors, that " they believed not in God, and trusted not in his salvation : though he had commanded the clouds from above, and opened the doors of heaven." Even the furious billows of the sea dare not pass the line which his finger has traced, without his permission : " I made the cloud the garment thereof, and thick darkness a swaddling band for it, and brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors, and said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no farther; and here shall thy proud waves be stayed." The inanimate and irrational parts of creation, properly speaking, cannot receive and execute the commands of the Almighty ; they are only passive instruments employed by him in his provi- dential dispensations, to produce certain efl^ects. To com- mand the ravens then, is to make use of them in providing for the necessities of his servant; to impart for a time an instinctive care to supply him with Ibod, to which they were by nature entire strangers, and which they ceased to feel when the end was accomplished. A command to sus- tain the destitute seer, after the brook of which he drank was dried up, was addressed in a very diflferent manner to the widow of Zarephath. It was couchecj in words ad- dressed to her understanding and heart, while the secret power of Jehovah inclined her to yield a prompt and efli- cacious obedience. On this occasion, a number of ravens were employed, because the service of one was not sufli- cient to supply the prophet with daily food. But the cir- cumstance entirely accords with the native instincts of that bird ; for the ravens go in quest of their prey in troops, and share in common the spoils of the chase. iFollowing, therefore, the instincts of their nature, which received for a time a peculiar direction, by the miraculous interposition of Jehovah,, a number of ravens associated together, in order to supply the wants of Elijah, whom his country had abandoned to the rage of an impious and cruel monarch : " And they brought him bread and flesh in the morning, and bread and flesh in the evening, and he drank of the brook." The Septuagint, in many copies, read the pas- sage, " They brought bread in the morning, and flesh in the evening;" but the common reading is entitled to the preference. It gives a striking display of divine goodness, that when the whole resources of Israel were exhausted by a long and severe famine, the prophet of the Lord was miraculously and abundantly supplied with nutritious food twice every day. The ravens brought it in the evening and in the morning, which were the stated hours of repast among the Jews and other oriental nations. The Hebrew writers eagerly inquire where the ravens foimd the provisions to supply tlie wants of Elijah; and, as may be supposed, very different are the opinions they advance; but on this question, which is of little impor- tance, no certainty can be obtained. The scriptures are silent on the subject, and we have no other means of inform- ation. It was enough for the prophet, that his winged providers regularly supplied his necessities; and it is suf- ficient to excite our admiration of the power and goodness of God, and our confidence in his providential care, with- out attempting to discover what the divine wisdom has seen meet to conceal. On another occasion, an angel was sent from heaven to supply the exhausted prophet with bread and water in the desert; which, in the eye of rea- son, may seem to be a more becoming messenger|of the King of glory, than a raven. But " the ways of Gcd are not as our ways, nor his thoughts as our thoughts ;" he did not think it beneath his dignity at this lime, to employ the ravens in the same office ; and he per)iaps intended lo teach us, that all creatures are equally subject to his authority, and fit for his purpose. When he gives the commandment, a raven is as successful in his service, according to the range of its faculties, as an angel; and we must not pre- sume to refuse or slight his aid, how mean soever the agent he condescends to employ. The Jewish legislator pla 'ed the raven in the list of unclean birds, whicli imparted pol- lution to every thing they touched ; but the same God who gave the law, had a right to repeal or suspend it; and that he did suspend it for atime in favourof his persecuted ser- vant, cannot be reasonably denied. Nor was this a singu- lar instance of divine clemency ; for the observance of ceremonial institutions often yielded to urgent necessity. The Jews were forbidden to touch a dead carcass ; but Sam- sow was allowed, for a special purpose, to eat of the honey which he found in the dead lion. The priests only we/e permitted by the law to eat the shew-bread; yet David and his men were justified by our Lord himself in using the consecrated loaves, when no other could be procured. Many are the reasons assigned by different writers, for the employment of ravens on this occasion ; but they are j so trifling, or so fanciful, that it is unnecessary to state j them; the true reason perhaps was to convince the deject- 1 ed prophet, that although his nation had forsaken him, the God whom he served continued to watch over him with unceasing care ; and that he would employ the most un- promising means, and counteract the most powerful in- stincts, rather than suffer him to want the necessaries of life. And when he saw those voracious birds, the cra- vings of whose appetite are seldom entirely satisfied, part, of their own accord, with their favourite provision, morn- ing and evening, for many days, and bring it themselves to the place of his retreat ; he could not mistake or disre- gard the secret influence under which, they acted. The brook Cherith, on whose border the miracle was wrought, is supposed to be the same as the river Kana, mentioned in the sixteenth and seventeenth chapters of Joshua, which watered the confines of Ephraim and Benjamin. This brook derived its name Kana, from the reeds, which, in great abundance, clothed its banks; among which the prophet found a secure retreat from the persecution of his enemies. Its other name, Cherith, may be traced to the verb Charah, which the Greek interpreters render to feed, because on its margin the prophet was fed by the ravenr.. Were this conjecture true, the name must have been given by anticipation ; for which no satisfactory reason can be assigned. It is more natural to suppose, that, as the verb commonly signifies to dig, aix sometimes to rush on with violence, thename Cherith alludes to the violent rapidity of the stream at certain seasons of the year, or to the deep pits which, like many other torrents in those regions, it excavates in its furious course. The particular situation of this brook is more distinctly marked by the sacred his- torian, who says, it " is before Jordan." This phrase seems to mean, that it flowed into the Jordan ; ana from Chap. 18. 1 KINGS. 263 the second clause of the verse we may infer, that its course lay on the west side of the river, because it is said by God to Elijah, "Get thee hence, and turn thee eastward, and hide thyself by the brook Cherith, that is before Jordan :" for Elijah must have been on the west side of Jordan, when he va.s commanded to go eastward to a stream that flowed j-c the Jordan on that side. — Paxton. Some suppose ravens to be a mistranslation, and that the promise referied to a people who were to feed the prophet. The following quotation from the Scanda Purana does not negative the opinion, but it shows, in a remote period, that birds were supposed on some special occasions to depart from their usual habiis. In the relation of the events of great antiquity among the heathen, much of fable must be ex- pected, but there is often a glimmering ray of light in the obscurity, pointing to circumstances which assist the mind in its attainment of truth. In the town of Kanche (Con- jeveram) it is said, " Of the birds, there is a sathaka bird which lakes food to the gods, a swan which gives precious stones, a parrot which repeats science, and a cock which crows not in lime of trouble." — Roberts. Ver. 12. And she said, As the Lord thy God liveth, I have not a cake, but a handful of meal in a barrel, and a little oil in a cruise : and, behold, I am gathering two sticks, that 1 may go in and dress it for me and my son, that we may eat it, and die. So said the widow of Zarephath to the prophet Elijah, How often ^o we see females, just before the time of boil- ing their rice, strolling about in search of a few sticks to make it ready. All their fires are made of wood, (or dried cows' dung,) and in a country where there is so much jun- gle, and so little rain, they seldom trouble themselves before the moment they require it. But the widow said that she was gathering two sticks; and it is not a little singular to find that the Hindoos often use the same number when it refers to many things. " Well, Venasi, what are you look- ing for 1"—" I am looking for two sticks to prepare my rice," " Child, go fetch me irendu-taddi, two sticks, to make ready my curry." " Alas! I cannot find two sticks to make the water hot." " My lord, I only ask for two mouthfuls of rice." " Ah! sir, if you will allow me to re- )eat two words in your ear, I shall be satisfied." " Good, lave you any thing more to say V " No, sir," " Then I have not two words for that," (meaning, he does not object.) Any person who has been in the East, will recognise, in these quotations, a figure of speech he has heard a thou- sand times. — Roberts. The corn which they reserve for daily use, they keep in long earthen jars ; because, when kept in sacks or barrels, it is liable to be eaten by worms. This is confirmed by Norden, who tells us, that when he was travelling in Upper Egypt, one of the natives opened a great jar, in order to show him how they preserved their corn there. In some regions of the East Indies, the paddy, or rice in the husk, is also preserved in large earthen jars, that are kept in the house; or in small cylindrical stores, which the potters make of clay ; the mouth is covered with an inverted pot ; and the paddy is drawn out of a hole at the bottom, as it is wanted. It seems to have been in one of these earthen jars that the woman of Zarephath kept her corn, of which she had only enough left, when the prophet Elijah applied to her for a morsel of bread, to make a handful of meal. In our translation, the original term (^^) chad is rendered barrel ; but a barrel, properly speaking, it could not be, because a vessel of that sort is never used for holding corn in those regions. Neither could it be a chest, although this is often used in the East for preserving corn ; because the Hebrew term is quite different. In the second book of Kings it is stated, that " Jehoiada the priest took (p-^N aron) a chest, and bored a hole in the lid of it, and set it beside the altar." The same word is employed by Moses, to de- note a coffin; but most generally, to "signify the chest, or iirk of the testimony, on which the cherubim stood, in the holy of holies. This term, among the Hebrews, therefore, properly signifieci a chest made of wood ; never a vessel for holding water. But (la) chad they commonly used to sig- •iify a jar or pitcher for holding water; which was made a earth, neve^ 0*" wood. It is the same word in the origi- nal, which the sacred historian employs, to denote the vessels in which Gideon's army concealed their torches, and which they broke wiih a clashing terrific noise, when they blew with their trumpets. Both these circumstances suppose ihey were vessels of earth, which are employed in the East for the double purpose of preserving corn and holding water. The {-c) chad was also the vessel with which Rebecca went out to fetch water from the v/ell; which, in our translation, is rendered pitcher. But the Orientals never carried a barrel to the fountain, nor drew M-ater with a wooden vessel. Hence, the barrel in which the woman of Zarephath kept her corn, was in reality an earthen jar. The four barrels of water, then, which Eli- jah commanded his attendants to pour on the sacrifice, should have been translated four jars or pitchers; for the original word is the same in all these instances, — Paxton, CHAPTER XVIII. Ver. 5, And Ahab said unto Obadiah, Go into the land, unto all fountains of water, and unto all brooks : peradventure we may find grass to save the horses and mules alive, that we lose not all the beasts. 6. So they divided the land between them, to pass throughout it : Ahab went one way by himself, and Obadiah went another way by himself See on Est. 8, 10. Brooks were generally the most likely places to find grass in a time of drought, though far from being places where they might be certain of succeeding ; for in such seasons, herbaceous animals generally stop near fountains of water, and feed m the vicinity, till all the grass be consumed. Thus travellers are often greatly disappointed, who natu- rally expect to find grass where they find water ; but on reaching the spot they find that the game has consumed every blade oi grass. However, as the cattle could not graze long where there was no water, it was the wisest method Ahab could pursue. The circumstance shows the simplicity of ancient manners, that a king and one of his principal governors should go at the head of such ex- peditions. It is the same in Africa at this present time ; for no king there, nor any of his principal chiefs, would think they were at all lessening their dignity by engaging in an expedition either in search of water or grass. Indeed, it would be viewed by the people as one of the most im- portant affairs in which their rulers could be engaged, and, did they succeed, few things would be likely to render them more popular. — African Light. It appears there had not been rain for three years and six months, which must have had a fatal efl^ect on vegetation. What would England (situated in a temperate climate) be under such circumsianceg ? In droughts in the East, which have lasted from six to ten months, how often have we seen men, like Obadiah, going along in marshy places, or by the sides of tanks, in search of grass for their cattle 1 See the poor fellow with a basket, made of the leaves of the pal- mirah, on his back, a little instrument (which works like a Dutch hoe) in his hand ; he strolls from fountain to brook, and no sooner does he see a green patch of verdure, than he runs with eagerness to the spot ! Perhaps he meets an- other in search of the same thing, when each declares he had the first view. They set to work, snarling at each other, and dealing out all kinds of abuse, till they have cleared the place of every green blade. Wherever there is a stream or an artificial watercofcrse, there the eye is refreshed with delightful verdure; but look a few yards from the place, and you see the withered herbage, appa- rently gone beyond recovery, but which, in a few hours, would start into fresh life, if visited by showers. The ef- fect of rain is like enchantment on the scene, and the Eng- lish stranger is often reminded of the green fields of his own native land. — Roberts, Ver. 9. And he said, What have I sinned, that thou wouldest deliver thy servant into the hand of Ahab, to slay me? Obadiah asked this question of Elijah, when the prophet wished him to go and tell Ahab, his bitter enemv, " Behold, Elijah is here." Thus, a person requested to do any thing 264 1 KINGS. Chap. 18. which implies danger or difliculty, asks, Enna-polldppo- sey-thaTie? " What evil or sin have I done 1" The ques- tion is also asked, when a man is visited with afiiiction, " What evil has he done T' — Rf berts. Ver. 10. As the Lord thy God liveth, there is no nation or kingdom whither my lord hath not sent to seek thee : and when they said, He is not there, he took an oath of the kingdom and nation, that they found thee not. People in England would be astonished and appalled at the frequency and nature of the oaths of the heathen. A man's assertion or affirmation, in common conversation, is seldom believed. Thus, men may be heard in the streets, in the fields, or bazaars, and children in the schools or the play-grounds, say, " Swear you will do this ; now take an oath you have not done it." Then they swear by the temple, or its lamp, by their parents, or children, and ap- peal to their deities for a confirmation of the assertion. — Roberts. Ver. 19. Now therefore send, and gather to me all Israel unto Mount Carmel, and the prophets of Baal four hundred and fifty, and the prophets of the groves four hundred, which eat at Jeze- bel's table. We are not, I apprehend, to suppose that these eight htmdred and fifty prophets, or even the four hundred of the groves, ate at the royal table, where Jezebel herself took her refection ; for though 1 am sensible it is not unusual in the East for servants to eat at the same table where their masters have eaten, after their masters have done ; and that several hundreds eat in the palaces of the eastern prin- ces ; yet it could never be thought necessary by Jezebel to have four hundred chaplains in waiting at once at court. I should think the words mean, that these four hundred prophets of the groves fed daily at a common table, in or near the temple of that idol which they served, and which was provided for at the expense of Jezebel, living there in a kind of collegiate way, as the prophets of Jehovah appear to have done. Their business was, I suppose, to sing the praises of the idols they worshipped ; and to watch from time to time in their temples, under the pretence of receiv- ing oracular answers to the inquiries of those that came to consult them ; and, it may be, to teach the worshippers in ■what form of words to address the deity they served. — Harmer. Ver. 27. And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said. Cry aloud ; for he is a god: either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked. In the hottest part of the day the Orientals retire to rest on their bed, till the cool of the evening summons them again to active life. " The heathens," says Mr. Blunt, " assigned all the properties and habits of man to their gods, and among the number, that of reposing at midday. Hence was it unlawful to enter the temples at that hour, lest their slumbers should be disturbed. The goatherd ventured not to play upon his pipe at noon, for fear of awakening Pan. Hence, too, the peculiar force of the de- rision with which Elijah addressed the priests of Baal: * And it came to p^s at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said. Cry aloud ; for he is a god peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.' Accordingly we read that these priests did not despair of rousing their god, and indu- cing him to declare himself, ' till the time of evening sacri- fice.' At that hour the period allowed for repose had ter- minated: and when he still continued deaf to their cries, then, and not till then, their cause became altogether hope- less." — Paxton. The margin has, for " talking," " meditatelh," and for "pursuing," ^^ hath a pursuit.^' This keen and ingenious sarcasm relates, I doubt not, to their god, as having been accustomed sometimes to sleep, to talk, to go on a journey, or to join in the pursuit. That the Baal-peor of Assyria, Bi>d the Siva-lingam of India, are the same, is certain. And is it not interesting to know that those things which are attributed to Baal are also attributed to Siva 1 " Either he is talking." The margin has, for " talking," meditatelh. Dr. A. Clarke says, " Perhaps the word should be inter- preted as in the margin, he meditateth, he is in a profound revery, he is making some godlike projects, he is consider- ing how he may keep up his credit in the nation." Siva was once absorbed in a profound meditation : to him the time appeared only as a moment, but to the world as ages, j Universal nature, for want of his attention, was about to expire. Women had ceased to bear, and all things weie out of course. The god-s and men became alarmed, and their enemies began to oppress them. All were afraid to disturb him in his meditations, till Cama, the god of love, I agreed to stand before him: when Siva, being aroused j from his revery, sent fire from his frontal eye, which de- i stroyed the intruder. " "Or he is pursuing." The Hebrew has this. " hath a pur- suit :" on which Dr. A. Clarke says, " he may be taking his pleasure in hunting." Siva is described as taking great pleasure in the chase ; and in the month of Septem- ber, his image and that of Parvati, his wife, are taken from ' the temple, put into a kead-agam, or car, and carried on men's shoulders to enjoy the pleasures of the chase! " Or he is in a journey." Siva is represented as taking longjourneys, and sometimes for very discreditable purposes, " Peradventure he sleepeth." Siva often did this, espe- cially when he took the form of a cooly ; for, after he had performed his task, he fell asleep under the tree called the Konda Maram. Thus the prophet mentioned four things, in some of which their god was engaged, and consequent- ly, could not attend to their requests. But it was manifestly improper, if he were thus occupied, for them to disturb him : yet Elijah said, " Cry aloud," let him hear you j he is no doubt a god. When a holy person before the temple, or in any sacred place, is meditating, not one will presume to disturb him : how, then, could they interrupt their deity % When en- gaged in pleasure, whether of the chase or any other amusement, no one dares to interfere with the great man ; and yet Baal was to be called from his pleasures. It is improper to interrupt those that are on a journey. They have an object in view, and that must first be accomplish- ed. No one will disturb a person when he is asleep— to them it seems to be almost a sin to awake a man from his slumbers. Where is your master 1 " Nittari," asleep ; and then you may walk off till another day. Yet, improper as it was to interfere with Baal in his engagements, the sarcastic prophet said, " Cry aloud." " And they cried aloud, and cut themselves with knives." Here, also, the devotees may be seen cutting themselves with knives till the blood stream from their bodies, or suspended with hooks in their flesh from a pole, or with their tongue cut out, or practising other cruelties on themselves, for the ex- piation of their sins, or the glory of their gods.— Roberts. Ver. 28. And they cried aloud, and cut them- selves, after their manner, with knives and lan- cets, till the blood gushed out upon them. If we look into antiquity, we shall find that nothing was more common in the religious rites of several nations, than this barbarous custom. To this purpose we may observe, that (as Plutarch de Superstitione tells us) the priests of Bel- lona, when they sacrificed to that goddess, besmeared the victim with their own blood. The Persian magi used to appease tempests, and allay the winds, by making incisions in their flesh. They who carried about the Syrian god- dess, cut and slashed themselves with knives, till the blood gushed out. This practice remains in many places at the present time, and frequent instances of it may be met with m modern voyages and travels. — Burder. There has been no little supposition and conjecture, for what reason the priests of Baal " cut themselves, after their manner, with knives, and with lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them." 1 Kins:s xviii. 28. This seems, by the story, to have been after Elijah had mocked them, (or, at least, while he was "mocking them,) and had worked up their fervour and passions to the utmost height. Mr. Harmer has touched lightly on this, but has not set it in so clear a view as it seems to be capable of, nor has he given very cogent instances. It may be taken as an instance ol Chap. 18. 1 KINGS. 265 earnest entreaty, of conjuration, by the most powerful marks of affection : q. d. " Dost thou not see, O Baal ! with what passion we adore thee 1 — how we give thee most decisive tokens of our affection 1 We shrink at no pain, we decline no disfigurement, to demonstrate our love for thee ; and yet thou answerest not ! By every token of our regard, answer us ! By the freely flowing blood we shed for thee, answer us !" &c. They certainly demonstrated their attachment to Baal ; but Baal did not testify his reciprocal attachment to them, in proof of his divinity, which was the article in debate between them and Elijah. Observe, how readily these still bleeding cuttings would identify the priests of Baal at the subsequent slaughter; and how they tended to justify that slaughter ; being contrary to the law that ought to have governed the Hebrew nation, as we shall see pres- ently. As the demonstration of love, by cuttings made in the flesh, still maintains itself in the East, a few instances may be at least amusing to European lovers, without fear of its becoming fashioiiable among us. " But the most ridiculous and senseless method of expressing their affec- tion, is their singing certain amorous and whining songs, composed on purpose for such mad occasions ; between every line whereof they cut and slash their naked arms with daggers : each endeavouring, in their emulative mad- ness, to exceed the other by the depth and number of the wounds he gives himself [A lively picture this, of the singing, leaping, and self-slashing priests of Baal !] Some Turks, I have observed, when old, and past the follies which possessed their youth, show their arms, all gashed and scarred from wrist to elbow ; and express a great con- cern, but greater wonder, at their past simplicity." The " oddness of the style invited me to render some of the above named song^into English : Could I, dear ray of heavenly light, Who now behind a cloud dost shine, Obtain the blessing of thy sight, And taste thy influence all divine; . 'Thus would I shed my warm heart's blood, As now I gash my veiny arm : Wouldst thou, but like the sun, think good To draw it upward by some charm.' Another runs thus: ' O, lovely charmer, pity me ! See how my blood does from me fly ! Yet were I sure to conquer thee. Witness it, Heaven ! I'd gladly die.' " (Aaron Hill's Travels.) This account is confirmed by De la Motraye, who gives a print of such a subject. Lest the reader should think that thi* love, and its tokens, are homages to the all-subduing and distracting power of beauty only, we add Pitts' ac- count of the same procedure : " It is common for men there to fall in love with boys, as it is here in England to be in love with women ; and I have seen many, when they have been drunk, give themselves deep gashes on their arms, with a knife, saying, ' It is for the love I bear to such a boy!' and I assure you, I have seen several, who have had their arms full of great cuts, as tokens of their love," &c. (Pitts' Ac- count of Mohammedism.) This custom of cutting them- selves is taken, in other places of scripture, as a mark of affection : so Jer. xlviii. 37, " Every head shall be bald, every beard clipped, and upon all hands, cuttings ; and upon the loins, sackcloth :" as tokens of excessive grief for the absence of those thus regarded. So, chap. xvi. ver. 6, " Both the great and the small shall die in the land : they sh^U not be buried, neither shall men lament for them, nor cut themselves," in proof of their affection, and expression of their loss ; " nor make themselves bald for them," by tearing their hair, &c. as a token of grief So, chap. xli. 5, " There came from Samaria fourscore men, having their beards shaven, and their clothes rent, and having cut themselves, with offerings to the house of the Lord." So, chap, xlvii. 5, " Baldness is come upon Gaza : Ashkelon is cut off, with the residue of her valleys ; how long wilt thou cut thyself 7'^ rather, perhaps, how deep, or to what length wilt thou cut thyself 7 All these places include the idea of painful absence of the party beloved. Cuttings for the dead had the same radical idea of privation. The law says. Lev. xix. 28, and Deut. xiv. 1, "Ye are the children of the Lord your God ; ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes, for the dead;" i. e. I restrain such excessive tokens of grief ; sorrow not as those without hope, if for a dead friend ; but if for a dead idol, as Calmet always takes it, then it prohibits the idolatrous custom, of which it also manifests the antiquity. Mr. Harmer has anticipated us, in referring " the wounds in the hands" of the examined prophet, Zech. xiii. 6, to this custom ; — the prophet denies that he gave himself these wounds in token of his affection to an idol ; but admits that he had received them in token of affection to a person. It is usual to refer the expression of the apostle. Gal. vi. 17, " I bear in my body the marks {stigmata) of the Lord Jesus," to those imprinted on soldiers by their command- ers; or to those imprinted on slaves by their masters ; but would there be any degradation of the apostle, if we re- ferred them to tokens of affection towards Jesus 1 q. d. " Let no man take upon him to [molest, fatigue,] trouble me by questioning my pretensions to the apostleship, or to the character of a true lover of Jesus Christ, as some among you Galatians have done ; for I think my losses, my suffer- ings, my scars, received in the fulfilment of my duty to him, are tokens sufficiently visible to every man whc considers them of my regard to him, for whose sake I have borne, and still bear them: I shall therefore write no more in vin- dication of my character, in that respect, however it may be impugned,' — Taylor in Calmet. Ver. 33. And he put the wood in order, and cut the bullock in pieces, and laid him on the wood, and said, Fill four barrels with water, and pour it on the burnt-sacrifice, and on the wood. See on 1 Kings 17. 12. Ver. 41. And Elijah said unto Ahab, Get thee up, eat and drink; for there is a sound of abundance of rain. It is as common in the East to say there is the sound of rain, as it is in England to say there is an appearance of rain. Sometimes this refers to thunder, as the precursor; and at other times to a blowing noise in the clouds, which indicates rain is at hand. In the vicinity of a hill or tall trees, the sound is the loudest; and it is worthy of notice, that Elijah was in the neighbourhood of Mount Carmel.- ROBERTS. Ver. It up to the And Elijah went up to the top of Carmel ; and he cast himself down upon the earth, and put his face between his knees. David's posture, mentioned 1 Chron. xvii. 16, in all probability was not unlike that of Elijah, which was one of most earnest supplication. I remember being present in the supreme court at Matura, when the prisoners were brought up to receive their sentences ; and when a Cinga- lese woman, on hearing her son's condemnation to suffer death, rushed through the crowd, and presenting herself before the bench, in the very posture ascribed to Elijah, en- treated, in the most heart-rending raimner, that his life might be spared. — Callaway. Who, in the East, has not seen the natives thus sitting on the earth, with their faces between their knees 1 Those engaged in deep meditation, in a long train of reasoning, when revolving the past, or anticipating the future, when in great sorrow or fatigue, as coolies after a journey, may be seen seated on the ground with the face between the knees, " This morning, as I passed the garden of Chinnan, I saw him on the ground with his face between his knees ; I won- der what plans he was forming : it must have been some- thing very important to cause him thus to meditate."" " Kandan is sick or in trouble, for he has got his face be- tween his knees." " The man threatens to trouble you." — " He trouble me ! I shall never put my face between my knees on his account." " Alas ! poor woman, she must have a cruel husband, for she has always her face between her knees." Elijah went " to the top of Carmel," to medi- tate on the past and the future: there he was, after the display of God's majesty in the fire from heaven, in the destruction of the priests, and in the certain anticipation of rain, with " his face between his kneesP — Roberts. The devout posture of some people of the Levant greatly resembles that of Elijah. Just before the descent of the rain, " he cast himself down upon the earth, and put his face 266 1 KINGS Chap. 19. between his knees." Chardin relates that the dervises, es- pecially those of the Indies, put themselves into this posture, in order to meditate, and also to repose themselves. They tie their knees against their belly with their girdle, and lay their heads on the top of them, and this, according to them, is the best posture for recollection. — Harmer. Ver. 44. And it came to pass at the seventh time, that he said, Behold, there ariseth a little cloud out of the sea, like a man's hand, And he said, Go up, say unto Ahab, Prepare thy chariot, and get thee down, that the rain stop thee not. That is, says Bp. Patrick, Elijah saw such abundance of rain coming as would cause floods, and render the way impassable, if Ahab did not make haste home : and accord- ingly, in a very short space of time that little cloud spread itself; and with a great thickness covered the face of the sky. ' When Elijah's servant reported to his master, that he saw a little cloud arising out of the sea like a man's hand, he commanded him to go up and say unto Ahab, prepare thy chariot, and get thee down, that the rain stop thee not. This circumstance was justly considered as the sure indi- cation of an approaching shower, for it came to pass, in the mean while, tha,t the heaven was black with clouds and wind, and there vms a great rain. Mr. Bruce has an observation, which greatly corroborates this relation. He says, " there are three remarkable appearances attending the inundation of the Nile: every morning, in Abyssinia, is clear, and the sun shines ; about nine, a small cloud, not above four feet broad, appears in the east, whirling violently round as if upon an axis; but arrived near the zenith, it first abates its motion, then loses its form, and extends itself greatly, and seems to call up vapours from all opposite quarters. These clouds having attained nearly the same height, rush against each other with great violence, and put me always in mind of Elijah's foretelling rain on mount Carmel. The air, impelled before the heaviest mass, or swifi^t mover, makes an impression of its own form in the collection of clouds opposite, and the moment it has taken possession of the space made to receive it, the most violent thunder pos- sible instantly follows, with rain ; and after some hours the sky again clears." — Burder, Ver. 45. And it came to pass in the mean while, that the heaven was black with clouds and wind, and 'there was a great rain. And Ahab rode out, and went to Jezreel. See on 2 Kings 3. 16, 17. Ver. 46. And the hand of the Lord was on Eli- jah : and he girded up his loins, and ran before Ahab to the entrance of Jezreel. See the man wh« has to run a race, or take a journey; he girds up his loins with a long robe or shawl. Elijah, therefore, thus prepared himself to run before the chariot of the king. Great persons have always men running BEroRE them, with an ensign of office in their hands. Elijah probably did this in consequence of the wonderful events that had taken place : fire having come from heaven, Baal's priests having been destroyed, the rain having de- scended, and the proud kmg his enemy having been recon- ciled, he ran before, as the priest of the Lord, to show from whom the blessings had come. — Roberts. ' Hanway tells us, that Nadir Shah, when he removed his camp, was preceded by his running footmen, and these by his chanters, who were nine hundred in number, and fre- quently chanted moral sentences, and encomiums on the Shah, occasionally proclaiming his victories also. The like practice obtained among the inhabitants of Mount Libanus, in the time of Pope Clement VIII. for Dandini, the pope's nuncio to the Maronites, says, " We were always accompanied with the better sort of people, wno walked on foot before our mules, and out of the respect they bore to the pope, and in honour to us, they would sing certain songs, and spiritual airs, which they usually sung as they marched before the patriarch, and other persons of quality." It was not confined, according to this account, to mean persons ; but persons of figure went before him in procession Avith songs. We are willing to suppose, that Elijah's running before Ahab's chariot to the gates of Jezreel, was not unworthy his prophetic character ; but as the idea of the mob's running before a royal coach will present itself to some minds, when they read this passage, so commentators are not very happy in explaining this piece of the history of Elijah. Bishop Patrick supposes he ran before Ahab like one of his foot- men, in which he showed his readiness to do the king all imaginable honour, and that he was far from being his enemy : would it however have become Beckei, the Arch- bishop of Canterbury, to have run before the horse of Henry II. to show he was not his enemy *? or even Friar Peito before Henry VIII. to do him all imaginable honour"? But if Ahab had chanters running before him, like Nadir Shah, it does not appear at all contrary to the rules of deco- rum, for one brought up to celebrate the divine praises, to put himself at the head of them, to direct them, in singing praise to him that was then giving them rain, and to inter- mingle due encemiums on the prince that had permitted ihe extermination of the priests of Baal ; or if he had none such, yet if it had been practised in those times, and was thought graceful and becoming a prince, nothing forbade Elijah's doing it alone : and perhaps what is said concerning the singers of the contemporary king of Judah, 2 Chron, XX. 21, 23, may enable us to guess, whether or not it was a practice totally unknown at that time. The expression of the divine historian, that the hand of the Lord was upon him, perfectly agrees to this thought, for it appears, from 2 Kings iii. 15, that it signifies enabling a prophet to prophesy: and consequently we are rather to understand these wo'rds, of God's stirring him up to the composing, and singing, of some proper hymns on this occasion, than the mere enabling him to run with greater swiftness than his age would otherwise have permitted him to do, in which sense alone, I think, commenta.tors have understood that clause. — Harmer. CHAPTER XIX. Ver. 4. But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper-tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O Lord, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers. The juniper is mentioned more than once in our transla- tion of the scriptures; but the opinions of learned men are much divided, concerning the shrub or tree to which the inspired writers allude. The gadha or gadhat, a species of tree very like the tamarisk, which grows in the sandy deserts, resemblej, in more than one instance, the juniper in our translation. It flourishes in the burning wild; its wood is extremely proper to burn into charcoal, which has the property of long retaining fire; on which account, it is carried into the cities and sold for fuel. The camel is very fond of its leaves, although they frequently affect him with pains in his bowels ; and under its shade, the wolf so com- monly lurks, that it has become a proverb among the Arabs, '* The wolf is near the gadha." But from these cir- cumstances it cannot be determined with certainty, whether the gadha of the roving Arab be the same with the juniper. The Hebrew word for the plant to which we give the name of juniper, is rothem, from the verb ratham, to bind or tie, on account of the toughness or tenacity of its twigs. In Parkhurst, it is the genista, or Spanish broom, which emi- nently possesses the character of tenacity. So great 15 their flexibility, that the Italians still weave them into bas- kets. The genista, it must be granted, affords but a poor shelter to the weary traveller from the intense heat of an oriental sky; while the prophet Elijah, exhausted with a long and precipitate flight, found a refreshing shade under the spreading branches of the rothem. But the remark ap- plies with equal, if not greater force, to the juniper, which in this country never rises above the stature of an humble shrub. The words of the inspired writer are by no means inconsistent with this circumstance : " But Elijah went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper-tree.— And as he lay and slept under the jimiper-tree, behold, then an angel touched him and said unto him. Arise and eat." The passage seems to import Chap i9. 1 KINGS, 267 that the prophet, unable to proceed, embraced the shelter of a genista, which, according to Bellonius, grows in the des- ert, for want of a better; as the prophet Jonah was glad to screen himself from the oppressive heat of the sun imder the frail covert of a gourd. But in reality, the genista, in the oriental regions, interposed with considerable eflect be- tween the parched wanderer and the scorching sunbeam. The roots of the rothem, or juniper, as we translate the term, were used in the days of Job for food, by the poorest of the people : " For want and famine they were solitary : fleeing into the wilderness, in former time desolate and wasie. Who cut up mallows by the bushes, and juniper- roots, (ve shoresh rethamim,) for their meat." But this circumstance determines nothing ; for neither the roots of juniper, nor of genista, nor of any other tree in those des- erts, can afford a salutary nourishment to the human body : nor can any modern instance be found, of the roots of juni- per or genista being used for food. Job only says that it was done in times of extreme wantj when the famished poor were frequently compelled to prolong their miserable existence by the use of the most improper ^bstances. It is certain that the shoots, the leaves, the bark, and the roots of other shrubs and trees, have been eaten among many na- tions, in times of scarcity and famine. Thus, for instance, Herodotus informs us, that when the routed army of Xerx- es v/as fleeing from Greece, such of them as could not meet with better provision, were compelled by hunger to eat the bark and leaves, which they stripped off*^all kinds of trees. The hungry Laplander devours the tops and bark of the pine ; and even in Sweden, the poor in many places are obliged to grind the bark of birch-trees to mix with their corn, to make bread in unfavourable seasons. The royal Psalmist mentions the coals of the rethamim as af- fording the fiercest fire of any combustible matter that he found in the desert, and therefore the fittest punishment for a deceitful tongue; "What shall be given unto thee, or v/hat shall be done to thee, thou false tongue 1 Sharp ar- rows of the mighty, with coals of juniper :" the wrath of God, like a keen and barbed arrow from the bow of the mighty, shall pierce the strongest armour, and strike deep into the hardest heart, and like the fierce and protracted flame of the juniper, shall torment the liar with unutterable anguish. Now, if it be the property of juniper long to re- tain the fire, or to emit a vehement flame, it is not less the characteristic of genista: for according to Geierus, as quo- ted by Parkhurst, the Spanish genista, or rethama, lignis aliis vehementms scintillet, ardeat, ac strideat, sparkles, burns, and crackles more vehemently than any other wood. The people of Israel in their journeys through the wilder- ness, came to a place called Rithma, probably from the great quantity of rethamim growing there. In'traversing the same inhospitable wilds, Thevenot and his fellow-trav- ellers were compelled to gather broom for warming them- selves and boiling their coffee. This greatly corroborates the opinion of Parkhurst, that the rothem of the Old Tes- tament is not properly the juniper, but Spanish broom ; but although his opinion is extremely probable, our imperfect acquaintance with the natural history of those remote coun- tries, renders it impossible to reach a satisfactory conclu- i sion. The shade of rothem, (whether it be translated the juni- 1 per, or the genista,) is supposed by some writers of great ■ eminence to be noxious. This circumstance isonentioned ; only for the purpose of vindicating the prophet Elijah, from the imputation of wishing to put an end to his existence, when he fled for his life into the wilderness. He went on that occasion a day's journey into the wilderness of Beer- sheba ; and sitting dowm under a juniper-tree, fatigued with his journey, and oppressed with grief, he fell asleep, : after having requested God that he might die. Grotius imagines, that the prophet rested under the shade of the juniper, because he was now become careless of his !, health ; and he cites a passage from Virgil, as a proof that i ,'iie shadow of this tree is noxious. 1 " Solet esse gravis cantantibus umbra ; ' Juniperi gravis umbra ; nocent et frugibus umbrae " Eel. x. I. 7.5. But his conclusion will not follow ; because Virgil evident- ; ly means, that the shades of evening are hurtful ; not the ^hade of the juniper, except by night, when the shade of , every tree is thought by natural historians to be injurious ' to health. If the shade of the juniper were noxious, it would be noxious to every one, and not merely to singers: And how could it be hurtful to the fruits ? They do not grow under it, and are there ore not exposed to its deleteri- ous influence. It is easy to see how the shades of evening are hurtful to the fruits ; but how the shade of the juniper ^ould be noxious to them, is quite inconceivable. The poet, indeed, expressly mentions the danger of reposing under the shade of that tree ; but the true reason seems to be this: the juniper being an evergreen, and its leaves growing very close, extends in the evening a more damp and chilly shade, than perhaps any other tree in that part of Italy. So little afraid were the Orientals of its noxious qualities, that some of their most magnificent cities were imbosomed in a grove of juniper-trees. This is an incon- testible proof that they did not find their effluvia deadly, nor even injurious to health. Another commentator of considerable celebrity, supposes, on the contrary, that Elijah reposed himself under the ju- niper-tree, for the more eflfectual preservation of his health ; the shade of it being, according to him, a protection from serpents ; and alleges, that it was the custom of the people in that part of the world, to guard themselves by such pre- cautions against the bite of these venomous reptiles. But this opinion seems to be no less visionary than the allega- tion of Grotius. Travellers often recline beneath the shade of a spreading tree ; but in all their narratives, the reason assigned by Peter Martyr is never once mentioned. Ac- cording to Dioscorides, the glowing embers of juniper wood, not the'shade of the living tree, possessed the power of driving away those unwelcome visitants. The most ob- vious reason is in this, as in most instances, the best : Elijah flying into the wilderness from the rage of Jezebel, became oppressed with the burning heat of the day, and the length of the road, and cast himself down under the shade of the first shrub that he found. Or, if it was in his power to make a choice, he preferred the juniper for the thickness of its covert, without any apprehension of its possessing either a deleterious quality, or the power of defending him from the bite of the serpent; he chose it merely for its shade, where, under the watchful and efficacious protection of Jehovah, his own God, and the God of his people, he sunk into quiet repose. To suppose that he repaired to the shade of the juniper with the view of ruining his health, and shortening his days, is quite inconsistent with every trait in the character, and every action in the life of that holy man. So far from harbouring the horrible idea of suicide, although certainly tired of life, he prayed to his God to remove him from the disgusting scene of idolatry and oppression, into his immediate presence; a sure proof he neither expected nor desired that favour from the nox- ious exhalations of the juniper. To this may be added, that the question is not yet decided, whether it was a juniper, or what particular species of tree it really was, under whose friendly covert the weary and afflicted prophet sought re- pose. — Paxton. Ver. 18. Yet I have left me seven thousand in Israel, all the knees which have not bowed unto Baal, and every mouth which hath not kissed him. Things which have been sent to the temples to be pre- sented to idols, are, when returned, kissed by the people. Should a priest give areca-nuts, beetel leaves, or cakes, which have been presented to the gods, the person receiving them kisses them. When a devotee has touched the feet of a priest, he kisses his hands. — Roberts. Ver. 19. So he departed thence, and found Elisha the son of Shaphat, who was ploughing with twelve yoke of oxen before him, and he with the twelfth: and Elijah passed by him, and cast his mantle upon him. The natives use the ox for the plough and all other agri- cultural purposes. It is no disgrace for a great man to fol- low the plough ; and, generally speaking, the master is the first to commence the operations of the season. The first day is always settled by a soothsayer, or a book of fate. " Elijah passed by him, and cast his mantle upon him." By this act Elisha was invested with the sacred office ; but it is probable there would be other ceremonies, and a more 268 1 KINGS. Chap. 20. pointed address, and extended conversation than that re- corded in the verse. When a Bramin is invested with the sacred office, both in the first, second, and third initia- tions, he is always covered with a yellow mantle, and in stich a way as to prevent him from seeing any object. The sacred string also is put over his right shoulder, (and worn like a soldier's belt,) which indicates his office. Elisha said, " Let me, I pray thee, kiss my father and my mother, and then I will follow thee." And Elijah " said unto him. Go back again ; for what have I done to thee 1" The an- swer of Elijah is certainly not very easy to be understood. The Hebrew has, instead of '• go back again," " go, return ;" this makes good sense, especially when the conjunction is added, " go, and return." The Tamul version has it also in that way. The same translation has, instead of " for what have I done to thee 7" " what I have done to thee THINK ;" literally, " I to thee what have done, think," I have called thee according to the Divine command; now thou askest to take leave of thy father and mother: take care thou art not led aside from thy calling ; " go, and re- turn," THINK on what I have done to thee. — Roberts. Among the Persians, the principal khalifas or teachers consider the sacred mantle as the symbol of their spiritual power. Though the khirka or mantle was in general only transferred to a beloved pupil, at the death of his master, .some superior saints were deemed possessed of a power, even while living, to invest others with the sacred and mysterious garment. *' When the khalifa or teacher of the soofFees dies, he bequeaths his patched garment, which is all his worldly wealth, to the disciple whom he esteems the most worthy to become his successor, and the moment the latter puts on the holy mantle, he is vested with the power of his predecessor." (Malcolm.) — Burder. Ver. 26. Therefore their inhabitants were of small powder, they were dismayed and confounded ; they were as the grass of the field, and as the green herb, as the grass on the house-tops and as corn blasted before it be grown up. " The sam wind, as described to me by an old inhabitant of the Dashtistan, commits great ravages in this district, particularly at Dashtiarjan, hurtful to vegetation. Ii blows at night, from about midnight to sunrise, comes in a hot blast, and is afterward succeeded by a cold one. About six years ago there was a sam during the summer months, which so totally burnt up all the corn, then near its maturity, that no animal would eat a blade of it, or touch any of its grain. The image of corn blasted before it be grown up, was most probably taken from the circumstance now men- tioned." (Morier.) Sir R. K. Porter however says, that the samiel, though hostile to human life, is so far from being prejudicial to the vegetable creation, that a contin- uance of it tends to ripen the fruits. These accounts may be reconciled by observing, that the former relates to the corn, and the latter to fruit, and that it may refer to its gradual approach rather than its sudden attack. If any unfortunate traveller, too far from shelter, meets the blast, he falls immediately, and in a few minutes his flesh be- comes almost black, while both it and his bones at once arrive at so extreme a state