SOLDIERS KING PHILIP S WAR A CRITICAL ACCOUNT OF THAT WAR A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE INDIAN WARS OF NEW ENGLAND FROM 1620-1677 OFFICIAL LISTS OF THE SOLDIERS OF MASSACHUSETTS COLONY SERVING IN PHILIP S WAR, AND SKETCHES OF THE PRINCIPAL OFFICERS, COPIES OF ANCIENT DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS RELATING TO THE WAR LISTS OF THE NARRAGANSET GRANTEES OF THE UNITED COLONIES MASSACHUSETTS, PLYMOUTH, AND CONNECTICUT WITH AN APPENDIX BY GEORGE MADISON BODGE, A.B. \ i MEMBER OF THE NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC-GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY, AND CHAPLAIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF COLONIAL WARS LEOMINSTER, MASS. PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR 1896 Copyright, 1896 GEORGE MADISON BODGE THIS BOOK WAS PRINTED BY THE ROCKWELL AND CHURCHILL PRESS BOSTON ******* M DCCC XCVI 5 TO MR. JOHN WARD DEAN, AT WHOSE SUGGESTION THIS WORK WAS AT FIRST UNDERTAKEN, AND TO WHOSE KINDLY ADVICE AND HELPFUL INTEREST IS LARGELY DUE ITS MEASURE OF SUCCESS, $i0 (ttofume IS AFFECTIONATELY INSCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. THE principal purpose of the author, in preparing this volume, has been the presentation of a concise and accurate account of the events of the Indian wars in New England, with lists of offi cers, soldiers, military committees, scouts, and others engaged therein, as full and correct as possible. Material has been drawn from all available sources, viz. : The official records of the three colonies, Massachusetts, Plymouth, and Connecticut; Rhode Island, as a non-combatant community, not being counted into the league. In addition r to these sources, the Colonial Ar chives have been diligently searched for unpublished documents, as well as the Registry, Probate, and Court Records, and documents of the several counties. I have consulted all known published histories and accounts of the early times : Bradford, the Mortons, Prince, and Winthrop ; with diaries and " personal accounts," like those published by Capt. John Mason, Capt. John Under bill, Lieut. Lion Gardener, P. Vincent, and others, together with later historians, Hubbard, the Mathers, father and son, and later yet, and of less authority, those like Benjamin Church. Then again Town and Church Records, family bibles, and local traditions have all been noted, and brought to give evidence. The basis, however, of the main body of the work, the services of the soldiers in Philip s War, is drawn from the ancient account- books of Mr. John Hull, Treasurer-at-war of Massachusetts Colony, from 1675-1678. A word of explanation concerning these precious old books may be in order here. In former times the books and papers kept by public officers were retained by them, at the close of their official terms, as their private property. It is not known just how these books were handed down, but the Journal, the most important, was discovered in the possession of Dr. John Gilbert, of Boston, PREFACE. by Mr. Isaac Child, and at his suggestion, kindly transferred to the New England Historic Genealogical Society, about fifty years ago. Two Ledgers, belonging to the same set of accounts, were acquired by the same society later, and have since been pre served in their safe, with many other precious documents. The old Journal was in a dilapidated condition when found by Mr. Child, and the society employed him to repair and index the volume, which he did with great patience and skill. Many parts of the book are now almost illegible, and few except experts can reconstruct the names ; while other parts are as plain as on the day of writing. This Journal contains accounts of debt and credit with everybody who had any dealing with the Colony of Massachusetts in relation to the war of 1675-78. The pages of the Journal, after the first and up to the fourteenth, are missing, but the first Ledger, fortunately, covers these pages so that it is possible to restore them entire. The first accounts show the names of those who furnished money, means, and material for the war. Then follow the individual accounts of the officers, soldiers, and others of every class, who served the Colony in this war, under the general account, " Military Service." These credits show that every soldier, on presenting himself to the pay master, must produce a certificate of service, or "debenture," signed by his commanding officer. Mr. Hull s system of book keeping was a quaint sort of " double-entry," or " mixed-method." It was very exhaustive, giving to every species of transaction a separate ledger account, as well as to every individual mentioned in the Journal. Some of these accounts are very curious and suggestive, for instance : " Bisket," " Liquors," " Ammunission," "Wast-Coats and Drawers," "Tobaco & Pipes," "Wounded Men," "Contingencies," "Woolves," "Quakers," "Captives," " Distressed-Dutchmen," " Scalpes," " Perquisites," " Queries." Many pages are lost from the last part of this book, while the time covered by the part left is much the most important of the war. The Journal accounts extend from June 25, 1675, to Sep tember 23, 1676. The first Ledger, beginning with the above Journal, contains now two-hundred and twenty double pages, on which is posted about half the matter in the Journal accounts. Both these books must have been originally much larger than at present. There is a later mixed Journal-Ledger, covering the years 1677 and 1678, in part, and indicating a closing-up of the PREFACE. Vll war accounts. Further explanation is given on page 446 of this volume. In searching these books for the name of one who served in the Indian war, the present writer discovered the importance of the accounts in the matter of the Indian war of 1675. Every soldier who served in that war is credited with military service, and the name of the officer under whom or the garrison at which he served is given in the credit. The date at which payment is made is given in the " Cash " account, but the time and place of service is not designated, nor is the residence or any further information about the soldier given. Some of the soldiers served at different times and under different officers. The best method therefore of arranging the men in companies was found to be that of following the names of the officers as they occur in the credits. The names were thus gathered from the Journal, and placed in companies with their officers. Then the fortunes of each com pany were followed as carefully as possible throughout the sev eral campaigns of the war. But it was found that a great amount of unpublished material is still preserved in our State Archives, County and Town Records, and elsewhere ; and this, in the light of the great number of names identified in these credits as soldiers, becomes available and interesting as history. Additional material has been gathered and incorporated here from all sources, whenever it would add to the sum of knowledge concerning the war. The officers and soldiers, many of them, served in several, some in all, the different campaigns ; and thus, in following their fortunes, it was necessary to go over the same events many times, so as to marshal the various companies in order in the military operations. It will be seen that by this method of arrangement a great amount of important material has been massed together con veniently for the study of history, while the story of the war has not been followed by consecutive events, but according to the experience of individual officers and companies. This incon venience has been obviated by the preparation of the Introductory Chapter, which presents the course of events in consecutive order. The first edition of the work was published in 1892, and soon exhausted. By numerous applications for the book, and by the viii PREFACE. advice of many who knew the value of the work, I decided to issue a second edition, though this involved the expense of reprinting the volume entire. Contemplating at first only the reissue of the former work, I expected that two months would be sufficient time to complete the matter. I soon saw, however, the opportunity to immensely increase the value of the book by including, in the Introductory Chapter, an account of the Indian wars of New England from the beginning. The time and labor involved in this addition are not seen in the result, but my readers will be saved much time and perplexity by the matter here gathered. In revising and recasting the former work, I corrected all proof by original documents, and was delighted to find that very few corrections were needed. Having in mind the new demand for critical accuracy imposed by the growing interest in American genealogy and biography, and especially in the patriotic societies, like the " Society of Colonial Wars," I have spared no pains to make my book absolute!} 7 " correct. I have tested the lists of names, the dates, and other matter, from Hull s accounts, and am confident that they are entirely accurate. I have realized the importance of absolute accuracy here, since any one who can trace descent from one of these who are credited with military service, has an indisputable claim to membership in the above- named society. Much new material has been added in the body of the work, besides the new chapters at the end. The footnotes from the former edition have been mostly embodied in the text. The lists of the Narraganset Grantees have been collected by me after a diligent research extending over many years. The old Proprietors Records are widely scattered, and several are in private hands, but, with one exception, my lists are copied directly from the original, and that list, " Narraganset No. 1," was copied and published by such a careful hand, and is so fully confirmed by Hull s credits, that I consider it of the highest authority. These lists form an entirely new department, while logically following the previous story of the great war of 1675-7. There is no doubt that Plymouth and Connecticut Colonies had treasurers accounts, like these of Massachusetts, and it is an irreparable loss to history that none are found preserved. In order to remedy this defect in a slight degree I have tried to PREFACE. IX gather items relating to the wars in those colonies from every available source. The " Voluntown lists " of Connecticut, and those of Numbers 4 and 7 of Massachusetts, relating to Plymouth Colony, will be found important additions. Into the Appendix, as well as the " list of later credits," I have tried to crowd all items bearing directly upon the Indian wars of New England, in order to make my volume complete in itself. I have given the lists of governors and deputy-governors of the three colonies from 1620 to 1687. The " triple alliance " for war with the Indians shut out the Rhode Island Colony, " on doctrinal grounds," so that she won no glory in the war save that which crowns the " Good Samaritan." The Indexes have been prepared with utmost care for the convenience and help of the readers, but no extended analysis of the relations of names has been attempted. Cross-references have been made in cases where the relation might not be readily noted. My new volume has grown to nearly one hundred pages beyond the first promise to my subscribers, with an added expense of several hundred dollars and a delay of some six months. I am consoled by the thought that my present loss is to be a permanent gain to my readers. In the course of my labors I have received encouragement and kindly assistance from many, some of whose names are mentioned in connection with special favors : To Mr. John Ward Dean and Mr. W. P. Greenlaw, of the New England Historic Genealogical Society ; Dr. Samuel A. Green, Mr. Charles J. Hoadly, Mr. J. C. J. Brown, Hon. George Sheldon, Mr. H. E. Waite, Mr. Walter K. Watkins, Capt. Philip Reade, Mr. Seymour Morris, Mr. Rowland Pell, and many others, I wish here to renew the assurance of my appreciation of their courtesy and kindness. To the members of my own family, too, for their continued patient help, my word of appreciation may properly be spoken here ; and especially along these pages I shall always find familiar traces of the faith ful " vanished hand " of my beloved daughter, May Alice Bodge, whose loving earthly service closed just before this volume was completed. And to the advance subscribers, who have responded with such ready interest to my prospectus, I wish to say that my own satisfaction with the volume will be measured largely by the satisfaction and help which they receive from it. PREFACE. One other element of satisfaction will enter into my enjoyment of the completed work : I have been able, in the course of it, to settle some disputed questions by the discovery of new testi mony, to assign to their proper places of honor some of the old- time leaders, and to do some measure of tardy justice to many a brave and true but long-forgotten name, by summoning again, from their two centuries of oblivion, these dusky battalions of the "First American Army," and marshalling them, "roster, rank, and file," upon the permanent page of American history. GEORGE M. BODGE. LEOMINSTER, MASS., August 10, 1896. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. PAGE GIVING A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE INDIAN WARS IN NEW ENGLAND, 1620-1677 1 CHAPTER I. BEGINNING OF HOSTILITIES, CAPT. HENCHMAN S COMPANY, 45 CHAPTER II. CAPT. SAMUEL MOSELY AND HIS COMPANY .... 59 CHAPTER III. CAVALRY COMPANIES, OR "TROOPS," OF CAPT. PRENTICE, LIEUT. OAKES, AND CAPT. NICHOLAS PAIGE . . 79 CHAPTER IV. MAJOR THOMAS SAVAGE, HIS FORCES AND OPERATIONS . 87 CHAPTER V. CAPTS. THOMAS WHEELER AND EDWARD HUTCHINSON, AT BROOKFIELD ". . 102 CHAPTER VI. MAJOR SIMON WILLARD, HIS MILITARY OPERATIONS AND MEN . . ... . . . . . .119 CHAPTER VII. CAPTS. RICHARD BEERS, THOMAS LATHROP, AND THEIR COMPANIES . . 127 CHAPTER VIII. MAJOR SAMUEL APPLETON, HIS OPERATIONS AND MEN . 142 Xll CONTENTS. CHAPTER IX. PAGE CAPT. ISAAC JOHNSON AND HIS COMPANY . , . . 159 CHAPTER X. CAPT. JOSEPH GARDINER AND HIS COMPANY . . . 164 CHAPTER XL CAPT. NATHANIEL DAVENPORT AND HIS COMPANY . . 168 CHAPTER XII. CAPT. JAMES OLIVER AND HIS COMPANY .... 173 CHAPTER XIII. NARRAGANSET CAMPAIGN ; THE " SWAMP FORT " BATTLE, 179 CHAPTER XIV. CLOSE OF THE NARRAGANSET CAMPAIGN ; THE " HUNGRY MARCH " 199 CHAPTER XV. CAPT. BROCKLEBANK S COMPANY; MARLBOROUGH GARRISON, 206 CHAPTER XVI. CAPT. SAMUEL WADSWORTH ; THE SUDBURY FIGHT . . 218 CHAPTER XVII. CAPT. WILLIAM TURNER; THE FALLS FIGHT . ... 232 CHAPTER XVIII. CAPTS. JONATHAN POOLE, THOMAS BRATTLE, AND COM PANIES . . . . . . . . . 258 CHAPTER XIX. CAPT. JOSEPH SILL AND HIS COMPANY .... 266 CHAPTER XX. VARIOUS OFFICERS AND COMPANIES ..... 276 CHAPTER XXI. MAJOR RICHARD WALDERNE S OPERATIONS AND MEN . 293 CHAPTER XXII. CAPT. WILLIAM HATHORNE AND HIS MEN . 318 CONTENTS. Xiii CHAPTER XXIII. PAGE CAPT. JOSHUA SCOTTOW AND HIS BLACK POINT GARRISON, 325 CHAPTER XXIV. CAPTS. BENJAMIN SWETT AND MICHAEL PEIRSE . . 342 CHAPTER XXV. LANCASTER AND OTHER GARRISONS ; " ASSIGNMENT OP WAGES " 351 CHAPTER XXVI. PHILIP, CANONCHET, AND OTHER HOSTILE INDIANS . . 377 CHAPTER XXVII. THE " CHRISTIAN INDIANS " OF NEW ENGLAND . . . 389 CHAPTER XXVIII. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIPS, ADDITIONAL CREDITS, ETC. . 406 APPENDIX. ADDITIONAL MATTER RELATING TO THE THREE COLONIES : PLYMOUTH COLONY ........ 455 Governors, 1620-1692. Capt. Myles Standish. List of Cap tains and Lieutenants of Militia. Organization of Militia, etc. Active Military Service in 1637 and 1645. Military Supplies, 1645. Additional Items concerning Philip s War, in Plymouth Colony. CONNECTICUT COLONY . . . . . . . 464 Governors and Lieutenant-Governors, 1639-1689. Military Affairs in Connecticut Colony. Lists of Soldiers. First Con necticut Cavalry. Military Officers previous to and during Philip s War. Windsor Troopers, 1676. Roster of Officers of Connecticut Militia. MASSACHUSETTS COLONY 469 Governors and Deputy-Governors. Earliest Military Affairs. Captains Underbill and Patrick. Arms and Ammunition. Official Roster of Militia, 1630-1637. Ancient Manual of Arms. Major- Generals of Massachusetts, 1644-1686. Organization of the Colonial Mil;tia, some Years previous to and during Philip s War. Capt. Mosely s " Volunteers." Sale of Indian Captives by Massa chusetts Colony. LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS 481 INDEX OF NAMES ......... 487 INDEX OF PLACES 500 INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER. CONTAINING A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE INDIAN WARS OF NEW ENGLAND FROM 1620 TO 1677. first event in the Indian wars of New England, as related A to its settlement by our forefathers, occurred on the 8th of ^ December, 1620, while a company of the Pilgrims were coasting along the shores towards Plymouth Bay, in their shal lop. The story is briefly, but graphically, told by Nathaniel Morton, for many years clerk of the Colony, and the author of what he called " New England s Memorial." After relating their experiences in Cape Cod Harbor, during the month of November, he says : " On the 6th of December they concluded to send out their shallop again on a third discovery. The names of those who went upon this discovery were " Mr. John Carver, Mr. William Bradford, Mr. Edward Wins- low, Capt. Miles Standish, Mr. John Howland, Mr. Richard Warren, Mr. Stephen Hopkins, Mr. Edward Tilly, Mr. John Tilly, Mr. Clark, Mr. Coppin, John Allerton, Thomas English, and Edward Doten, with the master gunner of the ship, and three of the common seamen. These set sail on Wednesday, the sixth day of December, 1620, intending to circulate the deep bay of Cape Cod, the weather being very cold, so as the spray of the sea lighting on the coats they were as if they had been glazed ; not withstanding, that night they got down into the bottom of the bay, and as they drew near the shore, they saw some ten or twelve Indians, and landed about a league off them (but with some difficulty, by reason of the shoals in that place) where they tarried that night. Next morning they divided their company to coast along, some on shore and some in the boat, where they saw the Indians had been the day before, cutting up a fish like a grampus ; and so they ranged up and down all that day, but found no people, nor any place they liked, as fit for their settle ment; and that night, they on shore met their boat at a certain creek where they made them a barricado of boughs and logs, for their lodging that night, and, being weary, betook themselves to rest. 1 _ THE PILGRIMS WARS. " The next morning about five o clock (seeking guidance and protection from God by prayer,) and refreshing themselves in way of preparation, to persist on their intended expedition, some of them carried their arms down to the boat, having laid them up in their coats from the moisture of the weather ; but others said they would not carry theirs until they went themselves. But presently, all on a sudden, about the dawning of the day, they heard a great and strange cry, and one of their company being on board, came hastily in and cried, Indians ! Indians ! and withal, their arrows came flying amongst them ; on which all their men ran with speed to recover their arms ; as by God s good providence they did. In the meantime some of those that were ready, discharged two muskets at them, and two more stood ready at the entrance of their rendezvous, but were com manded not to shoot until they could take full aim at them ; and the other two charged again with all speed, for there were only four that had arms there, and defended the barricado which was first assaulted. The cry of the Indians was dreadful, especially when they saw the men run out of their rendezvous towards the shallop, to recover their arms, the Indians wheeling about upon them ; but some running out with coats of mail and cuttle-axes in their hands, they soon recovered their arms, and discharged amongst them, and stayed their violence. Notwithstanding there was a lusty man, and no less valiant, stood behind a tree within half a musket shot, and let his arrows fly amongst them ; he was seen to shoot three arrows, which were all avoided, and stood three shot of musket, until one taking full aim at him, made the bark or splinters of the tree fly about his ears, after which he gave an extraordinary shriek, and away they went all of them ; and so leaving some to keep the shallop, they followed them about a quarter of a mile, that they might conceive that they were not afraid of them, or any way discouraged. " Thus it pleased God to vanquish their enemies, and to give them deliverance, and by his special providence so to dispose, that not any of them was either hurt or hit though their arrows came close by them ; and sundry of their coats, which hung up in the barricado, were shot through and through. For which salvation and deliverance they rendered solemn thanksgiving unto the Lord." ,/ This was the first battle with the Indians, and the scene of it was called by them at that time " First Encounter." This spot is in the present town of Eastham. They picked up eigh teen of the Indian arrows and sent them home to England by " Master Jones." Some of the arrows were headed with brass, some with hart s horn, and some with eagle s claws. It was late at night, and in a heavy storm, that they with much difficulty made what is now Plymouth Harbor, and lay-to under the lee of the Island, which they named " Clark s Island," THE PILGRIMS AND MASSASOIT. 3 because Mr. Clark of their company was the first to step ashore next morning. Here they remained the next day, and here, on the next, kept the memorable Sabbath. The following Monday they explored Plymouth Bay and re solved on this locality for their settlement, and so returned to their ship at Provincetown Harbor. The Landing of the Pilgrims was made on Dec. 21, 1620, at the place known to the Indians as Patuxit, now Plymouth. During the terrible scenes of the following Winter, the Indians, from time to time, showed themselves at a long distance watch ing their movements, but not troubling. In March, however, the famous Samoset came boldly into their midst and addressed them in broken English. He made them understand that he was from the Eastern part of the coast, and had known certain English fishermen, from whom he had learned the language. He was very friendly and helpful to the Pilgrims ever afterwards, in many ways. He told them of another Indian, Squanto or Tis- quanto, of the tribes near this place, who had been in England, and could speak English better than himself. Kindly entertained by the English, he came to them again shortly afterwards, bring ing some other Indians with him, and announced a visit to be made in a few days by the great Sachem, Massasoit, who came five days later, with the above-mentioned Squanto, and the chief of his friends arid attendants. Massasoit was Sachem of what ^/ had been a large and powerful people, but now greatly weakened by the fearful devastations of a plague, which had swept away a large part of his tribes along the coast, a few years only before the English landed at Plymouth. His residence, at this time, was at Sowams, or Sowamset (now a part of Barrington, R.I.). His dominion extended over the Massachusetts tribes as far as the Charles River, and it is supposed that the Pawtucket was the boundary between his people, known as the Wampanoags, and the Narragansets. The Cape Indians gave him allegiance, and all that part of Rhode Island east of Narraganset Bay. One residence of his was at Mount Hope, not far from the present city of Fall River, which became afterwards the permanent resi dence of his son Philip, or Metacom. On the occasion of Massa- soit s visit, a treaty of peace was arranged between him and the English. This treaty was for help against other tribes and out-Lx / side enemies : a league, indeed, for natural protection. It was the first treaty ever made in New England, and was the most important. The Wampanoags, in their present weakened condi tion, feared the power of the strong and warlike Narragansets, so that this league of defence was as necessary to them as to the English ; and to the small band of Pilgrims it meant nothing less than their salvation, since it threw their frontier fifty miles away instead of one, and united their interests with a great tribe, who were made strong by this league itself. After this treaty, 4 THE PILGRIMS WARS. Squanto remained at Plymouth as the interpreter and counsellor of the English. The treaty was faithfully kept by Massasoit while he lived. The dominion properly belonging to the Wam- /anoags was known as Pokanoket. The next trouble had with the Indians, after this treaty, was caused by an Indian chief named Corbitant, who lived near Nemasket, now Middleborough. Squanto had been joined at Plymouth by another friendly and influential Indian named Hobomak, and the two were sent out as agents of the English, among the tribes, to manage their trade in fur and other com modities. Corbitant provoked a quarrel, and attempted to stab Hobomak, who escaped to Plymouth and reported the assault, and his fears that Squanto had been slain. Immediately Capt. Miles Standish and fourteen men inarched to the Indian town and beset the wigwam of Corbitant, but found him gone. But they found Squanto had not been killed. In the attack upon Corbitant s wigwam, two or three of the natives were unin tentionally wounded, and these were brought to Plymouth, and kindly cared for by the English. After this, several of the sur- ounding chiefs came in and declared their friendship, and Corbitant himself, through Massasoit, sought to make peace with them. In September of this year (1621) a shallop was fitted out with ten men, and Squanto as guide and interpreter, and explored Massachusetts Bay along the shores of Dorchester, Boston, and the peninsula between the Mystic and the Charles Rivers. They were welcomed to this vicinity by Obbatinewat, the Sagamore of Shawmut. He accompanied them across the Charles River, and they tried to find the Squaw-Sachem of the remnants of the Massachusetts tribes, widow of the great Sachem, Nanepashemet, but were unsuccessful. During November, 1621, a messenger came from the Narra- gansets, bearing a challenge to war, as Squanto explained it, a snake-skin filled with arrows. For answer, Gov. Bradford filled the snake-skin with powder and bullets and sent it back to the Sachem, Canonicus, with the word that he was ready for either war or peace. Then the Pilgrims fortified their houses with palisades and set a guard at night, and arranged their fighting force in order for defence. During the Summer of 1622 they built a timber fort, " strong and comely, with flat roof and battlements ; " upon this, ordnance was mounted, and a watch kept. The fort also served as a place of worship. The " unruly " company, which came in Robert Cushman s ship, in 1621, and had lived upon the hospitality of the Pilgrims through the Winter and Spring, reducing their Colony to the verge of a famine, went away in August, to form a new plantation at a place since called Weymouth, under the grant to Mr. Thomas Weston. These colonists proved to be an indolent and wayward set, abused the confidence of the Indians, and finally caused a CAPT. STANDISH AT WEYMOUTU. 5 threatened outbreak, which rumor having come to the ears of the Governor, by a message from Massasoit, by Hobomak, Capt. Miles Standish, with a company of eight men, with Hobomak as guide, for he would not excite the suspicions of the Indians with a larger company, marched to Wessaguscus r ( Wey mouth), whence a certain Phineas Prat had fled, half famished, and disclosed a pitiful story of the destitution of Mr. Weston s colony. Capt. Standish found these men in great suffering, but not suspecting any plot of the Indians. Hobomak had discovered that the gen eral assault upon the settlers was to be begun here upon the weakened and helpless men of Wessaguscus, and then this should be the signal for a general attack of all the tribes in the league, no less than seven distinct tribes being in the plot. Soon after the arrival of the Captain and his men, an Indian came into the settlement as if for trade, and soon went away without molestation ; but the Captain suspected that he knew the purpose of their coming. Soon after, Peksuot, a chief of bold spirit, came in and told Hobomak that he understood that Capt. Standish had come to kill him and the rest of the Indians there, and dared him to begin. Then Wittuwamet and other Indians, in increasing numbers, began to come amongst them, growing more and more insulting, flourishing their knives and boasting of their strength. Finally, after bearing with their insults a long time, the Captain and his men managed to get Peksuot and Wittuwamet into a room together, with a few others, and then made a sudden attack upon them, disarmed and killed them, Peksuot being slain with his own knife, in the hands of the Captain, and Wittuwamet by the others. They then gave orders to Weston s men to kill the Indians with them, of whom they killed two. Then the Captain and his men began a general hunt for all Indians about, intending to make a sweep of all; but the Indians, getting news of the intention, fled. Winslow and Standish have been blamed for this sanguinary performance, but it was probably a question of killing or being killed, with them. The English believed that for their own safety they must try- to strike terror to the tribes, so they set the head of Wittuwamet upon the battlements of their block-house. The terror inspired by the English guns was so great, that many of the Indians fled into the swamps and woods, and many perished from cold and hunger, in their wanderings. However harsh these measures may appear to us now, we have to remember the precarious situation in which the Pilgrims were placed, a small hamlet on the shore of a vast unknown wilder ness, with countless hosts of savages swarming about, and only restrained by a wholesome fear of the English firearms and the sturdy courage of Standish and his "men-at-arms." The Pil grims themselves had hitherto treated all Indians who came in 6 THE PEQUOD WAR. a friendly manner, with kindness and justice. The roystering sailors, who had spent a Winter in the Colony, and the unruly elements of Weston s men, had cajoled, cheated, quarrelled with, and abused the Indians who came to trade, and those Indians, who were jealous of Hobomak and Squanto and Massasoit, took these occasions to organize a revolt, by which there was good evidence to show that they meant the total destruction of the V English settlements. Wary and prompt action was a necessity at that time. The event proved the strategic wisdom of the action, however unchristian it seems; for such dread of the English, and respect for their prowess, was inspired, that for many years there were no notable revolts of the neighboring /Indians. K The Pequod Indians caused the next trouble for the Colonies, and at one time seemed so formidable as to threaten their de struction. The Massachusetts Colony had been founded in 1630, and other flourishing plantations had been established at Salem and in the vicinity of Boston. The Dutch had settled at Manhattan, and made some attempts on the lower Connecticut River. In a few years Massachusetts had grown to be recog- ^/nized as the leading Colony. In 1634 the Pequod Indians first began to be troublesome. They were a strong and warlike tribe, who had come down the Connecticut River, years before, and seized upon the best lands at its lower parts. They had, with great cruelty, driven out the original tribes, and planted their principal town on the river, " twelve miles to the Eastward of the Connecticut River," which from them took the name of the "Pequod River." They had committed depredations upon the Dutch, and were at war with the great Narraganset nation. The Sachems of the Pequods were Tatobam, and afterwards Sassacus ; and of the Narragansets, Canonicus and Miantonomo. / The first overt act against the English was the killing of Capt. John Stone, whose vessel was coasting near the mouth of the Connecticut River, in 1634. Capt. Stone was formerly of the West Indies, but was known, rather unfavorably, both at Plym outh and Boston. He had committed some outrage against the Dutch, and was accused of piracy. He started on a trading voyage from Boston to the Eastward as far as York, where he took on Capt. John Norton as an associate in trade, or as pas senger, and sailed towards Virginia; but went into the Con necticut, and there, upon some trouble with the Pequods, was overcome and slain with all his crew. The Pequods, soon afterwards, sent messengers to the Massa? chusetts Colony to engage in a treaty of peace and friendship. When the above crime was laid to their charge, they claimed that it was done in self-defence. The magistrates demanded that those who had part in the murder should be surrendered, but were not very strenuous in pressing the claim, as the Indians told OLDHAM KILLED AT BLOCK ISLAND. T them that only two of those who had part in the act were left. The Indians made presents of "much wampum and beaver." The treaty was concluded, and it was promised that the English t^ would send a ship to trade with them, and would negotiate a treaty for them with the Narragansets, which they much desired, but were too proud to propose, but were willing the English should offer their foes a part of the wampum and beaver which they brought. The Pequods had, at first, and up to about 1633-4, held the Narragansets in subjection, but the latter were now at war and asserting their independence. The Pequods had, some time before, cut off a party of Indians who were on their way to trade with the Dutch, at their trading-house upon the Connecticut River, and in retaliation the Dutch had captured their old Sachem, Tatobam, and a small party of Indians with him, whom they killed. Tatobam was killed after Capt. Stone s death, and was succeeded by Sassacus. The promised vessel was sent out to the Pequods to trade. There is reason to think that ^/ this vessel was in charge of Mr. John Oldham, a man who had formerly caused trouble at Plymouth, being concerned in the revolt of Rev. John Lyford, and afterwards exiled from that Colony, and located at Watertown. He was of turbulent temper, but good ability. From some cause he did not succeed in making any advantageous trade with the Pequods, but secured a load of corn from the Indians nearer home, and excited the jealousy of certain of the Narragansets, so that when, next year, he was cruising about with but two Indians and two English lads in his crew, and ran in at Block Island to trade, a large body of the Island Indians came on board and killed him. They overpowered his crew and took his vessel, which they were robbing, when dis covered by John Gallop, of Boston Harbor, a skipper and pilot, who with his vessel, coasting along, discovered Oldham s vessel near the shore, and hailed, but received no answer, and then observed that the craft was in possession of the Indians, who were trying to get her under sail. Gallop, perceiving that they had stolen Oldham s vessel, immediately sailed up towards them, though having only his two boys and a servant for a crew, and but two guns and two pistols, with buckshot for bullets. Sail ing close alongside, he opened fire and drove the Indians below deck ; and making fast, went on board and discovered the body of Oldham, wrapped in fishing-nets. There are two different stories of this affair by contemporary writers ; one is that told by Gov. John Winthrop, and the other by Rev. Thomas Cobbet, of Ipswich, who had it directly from John Gallop, Jr., who was with his father in the affair ; and afterwards, as Captain of a Connecticut company, on Dec. 19, 1675, was killed at the freat Swamp Fight with the Narragansets. Capt. Gallop illed, or drove overboard, most of the Indians, captured four, one of whom he killed, and carried one away. By stress of 8 THE PEQUOD WAR. weather he was obliged to cut adrift the craft, which he stripped of her rigging, leaving the other two Indians in the hold alive. He sailed to Saybrook Fort, just built, at the mouth of the Con necticut, and there delivered his prisoner. The two Narragan- sets, who had been with Oldham, had already escaped and reported to Canonicus, who was Sachem of the Block Island Indians, and he dispatched these two with the prisoner, and a letter of explanation, written by Roger Williams, of Providence, his friend, to Gov. Winthrop, of Massachusetts, saying that he had already sent Miantonomo, with a strong force, to punish the Block Islanders, and bring the murderers to justice. The Massa chusetts magistrates demanded of Canonicus the restoration of the goods taken from Oldham, the return of the two lads taken with him, and vengeance upon the murderers. They suspected one of the messengers, who had been with Mr. Oldham, but respect ing the rights of a messenger, sent him back safely. It was found, by those who came with the boys from Miantonomo, that seven of the Indians who had been killed by Capt. Gallop were chiefs, and that the others, except the prisoner sent to them, had escaped to the Pequods, who now sheltered them. An embassy, consisting of Lieut. Edward Gibbons and John Higginson, of Boston, with the Sachem of Massachusetts, Cut- shamakin, was sent to treat directly with Canonicus, about John Oldham s murder. They reported favorably of the honesty and kindness of the old Sachem, on their return, but the magistrates determined to send out an expedition, and themselves wreak vengeance upon the people of Block Island. This expedition was raised from Massachusetts, by order of the new governor, Henry Vane. The Colonial records do not contain the account of its raising and outfit. But Gov. Winthrop tells the story. The force to be raised was ninety men, to be divided into four companies, under command of Capt. John Underbill, Nathaniel Turner, Ensign William Jennison, and Ensign Richard Daven port, and over all John Endecott, Esq., was appointed gen eral, to command the expedition. This force sailed in " three pinnaces " and " two shallops." They took two Indians as guides. They had commission to land at Block Island, and put all the men they could find to death, but to spare the women and chil dren and bring them away captive, and take possession of the Island, and thence go to the Pequods and require satisfaction of them, and demand the surrender of the murderers of Capt. Stone and other English victims, and a thousand fathom of wampum, for damages, with some of their children as hostages, and if they should refuse, to take these things by force. All who went in this expedition were volunteers. They executed their commis sion in part. Setting sail on Aug. 24, 1636, they arrived at Block Island on the 31st, where they landed with much difficulty, find ing about forty Indians on the shore waiting to receive them, EXPEDITION AGAINST THE PEQUODS. 9 with their bows and arrows, which were harmless, our men having corselets. Two only were wounded, one in the neck and another in the foot. As soon as the English made a landing, the Indians all fled. The Island is described as about ten miles long, four broad, " full of small hills and all overgrown with brushwood of oak." They could only march single file, and it was impossible to get at the savages. They found two large plantations, some three miles apart, and about sixty wigwams, some well-built and large. There were about two hundred acres of corn, some gathered in heaps, some left standing. They spent two days in a vain search for the inhabitants, and then burnt their wigwams and all their " matts," destroyed what corn they could, spoiled seven canoes, and killed one Indian, as was afterwards reported. Then they sailed to the Connecticut, and being reinforced at Saybrook Fort with Lieut. Gardener, with twenty men and two shallops, they sailed to Pequod Harbor, where an Indian came, in a canoe, to ask " who they were, and what they wanted." The General told him that they came from the Governor of Massachusetts to speak with their Sachems. He said that their Sachem, Sassacus, had gone to Long Island, and was told to go and summon the other Sachems. Then the English landed upon a rough and rocky shore, and soon the mes senger returned, and great numbers of the savages began to gather about them until there seemed to be some three hundred, and still the Sachems did not appear. At last, after several hours, the General saw that they were but dallying, and announced his demands, and said if they were not complied with at once, he would fight them, and bade them begone and take care of them selves, for he had come now to fight. But he would not allow any shot to be fired until they had time to withdraw from the par ley. Then our forces followed them, but they did not make any stand ; only they would turn and shoot their arrows from behind rocks and trees, but did no harm, while some of the English killed two of theirs. So the English marched up to their town, and burnt all their wigwams and matts ; but the corn was still standing in the field, and could not be readily destroyed. Returning at night to their vessels, on the next day they went ashore on the west side of the river, and having destroyed some wigwams and canoes, but finding no Indians, sailed away home ward. They arrived at Boston in September, without the loss of a single man in the whole expedition. Cutshamakin, a chief of the Massachusetts tribe, early residing in that part of Dorchester which became Milton, went in this expedition as an interpreter; and while scouting with the English, waylaid, killed, and scalped a Pequod. He carried the scalp to Canonicus, who sent it about to his chiefs, thus signifying his approval of the deed and his loyalty to the English. To the Pequods this meant a declaration of war, and threw them at once into active hostilities against the 10 THE TEQUOD WAR. English and their allies. Not more than a dozen of their men had been killed in the raid into their country, which they under stood to be a search for " Block Island fugitives ; " but this exploit of Cutshamakin s meant war. This whole expedition cost Mas sachusetts only two hundred pounds, as the officers and soldiers served without pay. The Pequods now tried to make peace with the Narragansets, but in vain. They sought to break up the new English settle ments, now being established on the Connecticut by settlers from Plymouth and Massachusetts, at Windsor, Wethersfield, and Hartford, and had shown their hostility to the garrison at Say- brook ; and now, when the Massachusetts troops retired, these new towns and the garrison were left in a very critical situation; and Lieut. Gardener complained of the affair to the Colonies. When the English had reembarked at Pequod Harbor, two of his soldiers had, somehow, been left behind, and were severely wounded. The Saybrook garrison were in a state of siege for many months ; and whenever they ventured from the fort, were followed by the savages, with intent to lure them into ambush. The only safety of the English, here, lay in their possession of firearms, which struck terror to their enemies, and even with these the Saybrook men came near being cut off on several oc casions. The authorities at Plymouth did not approve of the action of Massachusetts, and wrote them, stating that they had not accomplished any advantage by this expedition, but rather stirred up strife to no good end ; which letter was answered by Massachusetts justifying their course. Lieut. Gardener wrote a full and straightforward account of this expedition, which was published. One young man, of Saybrook, Samuel Butterfield, was captured at a short distance above the fort, and the place was long known as Butterfield s Meadow. Another small party, a few days later, was beset by a great company, and two were cut off. John Tilly, master of a ship, a very strong man, was capt ured and tortured to death by the savages. In April, 1637, the Indians waylaid some of the people of Wethersfield, near the fort, as they were going to the fields, and killed six men and three women, and at the same time made captive two girls. Some of their victims were killed with tortures, which roused the Colonies to plans of retaliation, as well as measures for their safety. The two girls were redeemed and returned by the Dutch, through Lieut. Gardener. April 10, 1637, Capt. Underbill with a company of twenty men was sent to strengthen the garrison at Saybrook Fort, then in command of Lieut. Lion Gardener. This was done at the charge of the " gentlemen of Saybrook," and for the protection of their plantations, by a vote of the Massachusetts Colony. Nego tiations were begun between Massachusetts and Plymouth about joining in war against the Pequods, while plantations upon the MASON MARCHES AGAINST THE PEQTJODS. 11 Connecticut were constantly increasing, by additions from Bos ton and surrounding towns. Capt. John Mason, who in 1632, as a lieutenant, had been sent to the Eastward in search of the noted pirate, Dixy Bull, was made captain of the militia, in No vember, of the same year; removed to Windsor, Conn., with Mr. Warham, in 1635, and there became the captain of their military company, and the hero of the "Pequod War." The three Colonies, having agreed to unite in a war against the Pequods, and having engaged the Narragansets and other minor tribes to serve with them, took measures to carry out their plans. Massachusetts agreed to raise one hundred and sixty men, under the command of Capt. Daniel Patrick, of Watertown, and Capt. William Trask, of Salem ; while Capt. Israel Stoughton, of Dor chester, was chosen commander-in-chief of the expedition, and Rev. John Wilson, pastor of the church in Boston, went as chap lain. Plymouth agreed to send fifty men, under Lieut. William Holmes, as commander, and Rev. Thomas Prince, as chaplain and counsellor. Thirty of these men were to be sent for land service, and as many others as should be required to manage the barques. The list of names, and further particulars about the preparations, will be found in the Appendix. It may be said here that before these were ready, the war was nearly finished, so they were not sent. The towns on the Connecticut River, Windsor, Hartford, and Wethersfield, being most concerned in this war, were most for ward in its prosecution. May 1, 1637, the General Court at Hartford voted "an offensive war against the Pequods." On May 10, 1637, ninety men had been raised in these three towns, forty-two from Hartford, thirty from Windsor, and eighteen from Wethersfield, equipped for war, and under the command of Capt. John Mason, of Windsor, and Lieut. Robert Seely (Sealy), of Wethersfield, embarked on board " one Pink, one Pinnace, and one Shallop," with the Sachem Uncas and seventy of his Mohegan Indians along as allies. The water of the river being low, the vessels often ran aground, which made the progress so slow that the Indians grew impatient and asked to be set ashore to go on foot to Saybrook Fort, which was done. When the Indians reported at the fort, Lieut. Gardener distrusted their hon esty, and demanded some proof of their good faith. So Uncas sent out a war-party, who found six of the Pequods, four of whom they killed, one escaped, and another they brought captive to the fort, where he was put to death. This victim s name was Kiswas. On Wednesday Capt. Mason with the Con necticut force arrived at the fort, and on Friday set sail for Nar- raganset. At Saybrook Fort Lieut. Gardener had reinforced their company with Lieut. Underbill and twenty of his best men, with such supplies as they needed, and sent Mr. Thomas Pell with them as surgeon. Twenty of the least serviceable of 12 THE PEQUOD WAR. Capt. Mason s men were sent back to the plantations to strengthen them. The Mohegans sailed with them. They ar rived at Narraganset on Saturday evening and there " kept the Sabbath." They lay wind-bound off shore until Tuesday even ing, when they landed and marched about five miles inland to the residence of the Narraganset Sachem, Canonicus, to whom Capt. Mason apologized for marching into his country with an armed force without giving him previous notice. He requested permission of the Sachem to pass with his troops through his dominions, and declared his purpose of making war on the Pequods, on account of the outrages against the English. Canon icus received them kindly, but warned them that the Pequods were strong and crafty warriors, many hundred in number, and now securely entrenched in two great forts. Having gained the permission desired, they marched, on Wednesday morning, to a place called Niantick, on the Pequod frontier, where the Narragansets had a fort. The Indians here appearing somewhat inhospitable, Capt. Mason placed guards about their fort, so that they might not be able to carry news of his design to the enemy. Here they passed the night. In the meantime a mes senger had come from Capt. Patrick, who was at Providence, with a company of forty men from Massachusetts, a part of the force to be sent from that Colony upon the present expedition. He requested Capt. Mason to wait for him to join his force, but did not tell when he would come. Capt. Mason and his officers in council decided that secrecy and haste were more valuable than the additional numbers, and so determined to push forward with their present force. In the morning there came a party of the Narragansets from Mianto- nomo, nephew and associate Sachem of Canonicus, who offered to join and assist in their design. Then the Indians in the fort came out and engaged with them for the same end. About eight o clock on Tuesday morning, with seventy-seven English and a company of near five hundred Indians, they inarched twelve miles to a ford of the Pawcatuck River, where they halted for a rest. Here many of the Narragansets turned back. The heat being extreme, another halt was made about three miles farther on, and a council was called to decide the method of attack. Uncas, and the renegade Pequod " Wequash," their guide, were consulted; who told them of two strong forts of the Pequods, several miles apart, and they decided, at first, to attack both at the same time ; but finding the farthest so distant, and the troops so weary with the heat and the long march, that they could hardly reach it before midnight, they were forced to choose the nearest. This was a disappointment, as they heard that Sassa- cus, the chief Sachem of the Pequods, was at the distant fort. Marching silently towards the nearest fort, they halted, about one hour after dark, in a small valley and there made their camp. CAPTURE OF THE PEQUOD FORT. 13 Posting their guards around the camp, and at some distance in front, they rested upon their arms until dawn. Their outposts reported that they could hear the Pequods, in their fort, shout ing and rejoicing after their manner, till past midnight ; the cause being the supposed flight of the English, whose vessels they had seen, sailing to the Eastward. At break of day the soldiers were mustered quickly and silently for the battle, the Indians keeping far in the rear. After marching about two miles, and not yet seeing signs of the fort, Capt. Mason called Uncas and Wequash to him, and they pointed out the fort at the top of a high hill close at hand. He told them to ask the Indians not to fly and leave them until they had seen whether Englishmen would fight. Then forming their line of battle, they marched in two divisions, Capt. Mason intending with the first to gain the entrance at the North-east, and Capt. Underhill that at the South side. Capt. Mason s company approached within one rod of the palisade, before any alarm was sounded from the fort. Then, as he relates, they " heard a dog bark, and an Indian crying Owanux ! Owanux ! which is, Englishmen ! English men ! " And now I will quote from Capt. Mason s own words : We called up our Forces with all expedition, gave Fire through the Pallizado upon them ; the Indians being in a dead, indeed in their last Sleep. Then we wheeling off fell upon the main Entrance, which was blocked up with Bushes about Breast high, over which the Captain passed, intending to make good the Entrance, encouraging the rest to follow. Lieutenant Seeley endeavoured to enter ; but being somewhat cumbred stepped back and pulled out the Bushes and so entered, and with him about sixteen Men. We had formerly concluded to destroy them by the Sword and save the Plunder. Whereupon Captain Mason seeing no Indians entred a Wigwam ; where he was beset with many Indians, waiting all opportunities to lay Hands on him, but could not prevail. At length William Heydon espying the Breach in the Wigwam, supposing some English might be there, entred ; but in his Entrance fell over a dead Indian ; but speedily recovering himself, the Indians some fled, others crept under their Beds : The Captain going out of the Wigwam saw many Indians in the Lane or Street ; he making towards them, they fled, were pursued to the End of the Lane, where they were met by Edward Pattison, Thomas Barber, with some others ; where seven of them were Slain, as they said. The Captain facing about, Marched at slow Pace up the Lane he came down, perceiving himself very much out of Breath ; and coming to the other End near the Place he first entred, saw two Soldiers stand ing close to the Pallizado with their Swords pointed to the Ground : The Captain told them that We should never kill them after that manner : The Captain also said, We must Burn them ; and immediately stepping into the Wigwam where he had been before, brought out a Firebrand, and putting it into the Matts with which they were covered, set the Wigwams on Fire. Lieutenant Thomas Bull and Nicholas Omsted 14 THE PEQUOD WAR. beholding, came up ; and when it was thoroughly kindled, the Indians ran about as most dreadfully Amazed. And indeed such a dreadful Terror did the Almighty let fall upon their Spirits, that they would fly from us and run into the very Flames, where many of them perished. And when the Fort was thoroughly Fired, Command was given, that all should fall off and surround the Fort ; which was readily attended by all ; only one Arthur Smith being so wounded that he could not move out of the Place, who was happily espied by Lieutenant Bull, and by him rescued. The Fire was kindled on the North East Side to windward ; which did swiftly overrun the Fort, to the extream Amazement of the Enemy, and great Rejoycing of our selves. Some of them climbing to the Top of the Pallizado ; others of them running into the very Flames ; many of them gathering to windward, lay pelting at us with their Arrows ; and we repayed them with our small Shot : Others of the Stoutest issued forth, as we did guess, to the Number of Forty, who perished by the Sword. What I have formerly said, is according to my own Knowledge, there being sufficient living Testimony to every Particular. But in reference to Captain Underbill and his Parties acting in this Assault, I can only intimate as we were informed by some of them selves immediately after the Fight, Thus, They Marching up to the Entrance on the South West Side, there made some Pause ; a valiant, resolute Gentleman, one Mr. Hedge, stepping towards the Gate, say ing, If we may not Enter, wherefore came we here ; and immediately endeavoured to Enter ; but was opposed by a sturdy Indian which did impede his Entrance ; but the Indian being slain by himself and Ser geant Davis, Mr. Hedge Entred the Fort with some others ; but the Fort being on Fire, the Smoak and Flames were so violent that they were constrained to desert the Fort. Capt. Underbill also wrote a full account of the battle, which differs but little from that of Capt. Mason. He says that they found the South entrance stopped up with " arms of trees." It seems that the Indians had made a rude " abattis " with the tops of trees turned outward, the trunks buried with rocks and earth. This made a very effectual barrier to an attack from without, when defended from within. Capt. Underhill advanced to these and tried to pull them away, and then com manded his men to lay hold of them, which they did, and removed them and entered the fort, without his command. Among those first entering was " one Master Hedge," who was attacked by a powerful savage, and was shot through both arms. Capt. Mason speaks of this young man as having performed a very brave act, and a contemporary writer, in London, gives account of the battle, in which he rather slurs Capt. Underhill, and makes this Hedge the leader of the attack at the South entrance. Capt. Underhill resented this story bitterly, and denied that he asked the question " Shall we enter ? " as this last writer reported. He says that with his soldiers he entered the BURNING OF THE PEQUOD FORT. 15 fort, and with Capt. Mason entered the wigwam, and received a wound from an arrow, in his left hip, though having on "a sufficient buff coat." He describes the fight as very desperate and brave on the part of the Indians. " Most courageously these Pequeats behaved themselves," he says. And he declares that their bows and arrows were by no means to be despised, as they used them there. " But seeing the fort was too hot for us," he says, " we devised a way by which we might save ourselves, and prejudice them." Capt. Mason set fire to the wigwams with a firebrand, and he " with a train of powder," the two columns of fire meeting in the centre of the fort. The fire was so hot that it burnt the bowstrings of the Indians and left them defence less. If any escaped the English, they fell into the hands of the Mohegans or Narragansets, to be cut down without mercy. He says, " Many courageous fellows fought most desperately through the palisadoes, while scorched and burnt by the flames ; mercy did they deserve for their valor, could we have had opportunity to bestow it." " It may be demanded, Should not Christians have more mercy and compassion ? But I would refer you to David s war. Sometimes the Scripture declareth women and children must perish with their parents. We had sufficient light from the word of God for our proceedings." The number of the Pequods slain in this terrible fight has been variously estimated. Capt. Mason thought six or seven hundred. The Mohegans reported that there were four hundred killed. Only seven escaped and seven taken captive. The whole dreadful deed was completed in one hour from the beginning of the attack. Only two of the English were killed and about twenty wounded. But after the fight, though victorious, the English found themselves in trying conditions ; they were severely oppressed with the heat, and thirsty, with no supply of water and with scant supply of food. They were told that Sassacus, with a large force of Pequods, was hastening from the other fort, arid the Narragansets were in great trepidation to be gone. They were uncertain about what time their vessels would appear, or where. Just as the Pequods began to appear, and, maddened by the awful calamity which had befallen their people, to attack them with fury, they saw their vessels coming toward them with a fair wind. The rear-guard, under Capt. Underbill, met the enemy s attack so warmly, that they became more wary, and, manoeuvring to outflank the English, came upon the Mohegans and Narragansets, driving them to the shelter of the English muskets. They kept up a fierce fight until within two miles of the vessels in Pequod River, then withdrew. Arriving at the shore, Capt. Mason and his little army, well- nigh spent with their marching and fighting, were refreshed with supplies from their vessels. Here they found Capt. Patrick, with 16 THE PEQUOD WAR. his company of forty men, who had joined our vessels with his own, a little before. He was evidently offended that he was not waited for at Narraganset, and chagrined at the great success of Capt. Mason. From Pequod Harbor the Narragansets were sent home by sea, while Capt. Mason, with the few able-bodied men of his company, marched overland to Saybrook Fort, with Capt. Patrick and his company along. Capt. Underbill and his men, and the wounded, went by water. At the fort all were enter tained by Lieut. Gardener. Thence they returned to their homes on the Connecticut, where they were received with great rejoicing. Capt. Underbill, with his company of twenty men, whose term at Saybrook had expired, sailed homeward to Massachusetts, and on the voyage met the company of one hundred men, under Capt. Israel Stoughton, sailing out to fight the Pequods. Capt. Patrick awaited this force at Saybrook. The Indian fort which was destroyed was at a place called " Mistick," on a hill in the present town of Groton, Conn., known since as " Pequot Hill." The battle was fought on Friday, May 26, 163T. It is said that the evening before the battle, a hundred and fifty warriors from the other fort had come to this, in order to start in force upon the war-path the next day ; either to follow the English troops toward Narraganset, or to fall upon their set tlements on the Connecticut River. By this chance these had been included in the general massacre. Capt. Mason relates that after leaving their pursuit of the English near Pequod Harbor, the Pequods returned in a body to the fort in which Sassacus re mained, where many of them began to upbraid him as the cause of all their troubles, and demanded the destruction of himself and his family. Wiser counsels prevailed, however, and they resolved to leave their country, now encompassed by merciless, and, they con ceived, resistless, enemies. Burning their villages and everything that could not be taken along with them, they retreated with their main body to the Westward across the Connecticut River, where they killed three Englishmen, after a stubborn fight, and hung their bodies upon trees on the shore. The main body under the Sachem, Sassacus, moved slowly along the shore of the Sound, depending largely upon shell-fish for food. Another division of the tribe, probably following the other Sachem, Mononotto, pushed farther into the country. Mohegan and Narraganset scouts, at a safe distance, kept track of them. About one month after the battle, Capt. Stoughton, with several vessels and one hundred and twenty men from Massachu setts Colony, arrived at Pequod Harbor. Here they were joined by Capt. Patrick s company. While here, the Mohegans told them of a large party of fugitives gathered at a place some twelve miles up the river. The English marched up in force, surrounded STOUGHTON S FORCES ARRIVE. 17 these, and captured them without an attempt at resistance. The number taken was about one hundred and four. Twenty-four of these were men ; and twenty-two of these were taken on board the vessel of the skipper, John Gallop, and " executed " just out side the harbor. Two were spared on condition of guiding the English to the hiding-place of Sassacus. Proving unable or unwilling to perform this service, they too, it is said, were put to death. Of the eighty women and children, thirty-three were allotted to their Indian allies, and the rest were sent home to Boston, to be sold as slaves. In a written report of his progress, made to Gov. Winthrop, Capt. Stoughton says : By this Pinnace you shall receive forty-eight or fifty women and children, unless there stay any here to be helpful, etc., concerning which there is one, that is the fairest and largest that I saw amongst them, to whom I have given a coat to cloatheher. It is my desire to have her for a servant, if it may stand with your good liking, otherwise not. There is a little squaw that steward Culacut desireth, to whom he hath given a coate. Lieut. Davenport desireth one, to wit, a small one. He de sireth her if it will stand with your good liking. Sosomon, the Indian, desireth, a young little squaw, which I know not. In closing his report Capt. Stoughton says : At the present Mr. Haynes, Mr. Ludlow, Capt. Mason, and thirty men are with us in Pequot River ; and we shall next week join in seeing what we can do against Sassacus, and another great sagamore, Monowattuck. Here is yet good work to be done and how dear it will cost is unknown. Sassacus is resolved to sell his life, and so the other with his company as dear as they can. Capt. Mason writes that the Connecticut towns sent him in command of forty men to cooperate with Capt. Stoughton, in the further pursuit of the Pequods. From Pequod Harbor the Eng lish forces moved along the Sound, landing from time to time. At " Quinnipiack " (New Haven) they saw a great smoke at some distance in the woods, and lauded, thinking that they had discovered the enemy ; but their Indian scouts soon found that it was only some friendly Indians burning brush. A Mohegan, called Jack Eatow, going ashore, captured two Pequods, and brought them on board. There is a story that Uncas, on the way thither, captured a small party of the enemy, one of whom, a sachem, he beheaded, and lodged his head in a tree, where it hung for years. This was upon a high bluff on the shore, a few miles below Guilford, which has been known since as "Sachem s Head." Moving westward, one of their Pequod spies proved faithful to them, and faithless to his people. In token of his treachery, they named this traitor " Luz " with grim humor ; and he guided them to a 18 THE PEQUOD WAR. great company of the Indians, at a place called " Unquowa," now within the town of Fairfield, Conn. A large party of the fugitive Pequods had imposed themselves by force upon the local tribe, and were now with them at their village, which was situated close to a great swamp. This swamp is described as about one mile in circumference, and divided, by a narrow strip of solid land, into two unequal parts. When the advance-guard of the English approached, all the Indians with one accord fled in dismay into the dense recesses of the swamp. Sergt. Palmer, with a squad of the advance-guard, hastened around by the smaller division of the swamp, to cut off escape by that side. Lieut. Richard Davenport, of Salem, Capt. Trask s company, with a few men rushed into the bushes, thinking to push through to the wigwams which were on the other side, sud denly found themselves sinking in the miry ground, entangled in the dense underbrush, and fiercely attacked by the savages. Lieut. Davenport, Sergts. John Wedgewood and Thomas Sher man and others, were severely wounded, and only with the great est difficulty rescued from their perilous plight by the bravery of Sergts. Edward Riggs, of Roxbury, and Thomas Jeffrey, of Dor chester. The main body of the troops then advancing, the whole swamp was surrounded. The line surrounding the swamp was, according to Capt. Mason, a very long one, being formed at a wide distance from the edge of the bushes ; but was soon lessened by cutting through the narrow strip, thus shortening the "leaguer," and shutting the Indians into the smaller swamp. The brief skirmish at the beginning admonished the English that they were now facing a brave and desperate foe, no longer entirely at their mercy. There was a rumor also, brought back by the two captive girls to Wethersfield, that the Pequods had some sixteen muskets, which they might craftily discharge upon their assailants unexpectedly. So they decided to hold a parley with the foe. Thomas Stanton was sent to speak with them, readily understanding their language, and offering to go upon this service. He soon returned with about two hundred old men, women, and children, including the local tribe. Then the war riors sent the challenge from the swamp, that they would fight it out with the English to the end. And Stanton, going once more to them, to urge terms of their surrender, was met with a fierce volley of arrows so as scarcely to escape with his life. Then the guards were set, and close watch kept all night with frequent shooting on both sides. In the deepest darkness, about an hour before the dawn, the savages massed their numbers, and, after some desperate fighting, broke through Capt. Patrick s lines, and escaped. Capt. Mason speaks of Capts. Trask and Patrick, and also Sergt. Stares, as having taken part in this fight, besides those CLOSK OF THE PEQUOD WAR. 19 above named. On searching the swamp, they found but few slain. One hundred and eighty women and children were divided between Massachusetts and Connecticut to be used as servants. Two women and fifteen boys were sent to Bermuda, by Mr. William Peirce, to be sold as slaves, but were carried by mistake to u Providence Isle." Among the women taken was the wife of the Sachem Mononotto, with her two children, whose demeanor and behavior were such as to win the respect of even the most violent Indian-haters. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I would suggest that Mononotto was in command of the Indians in the swamp at Fairfield, and led the party, estimated by Capt. Mason at seventy, which escaped. Sassacus and a party of his warriors escaped to the Mohawks, but were set upon and killed by them, and their scalps were brought to the authorities at Con necticut, from whom pieces were taken to Boston, by Mr. Pinchon and Mr. Ludlow, who went hither to consult about the disposal of the conquered remnants of the fallen tribe. They reported the Pequods entirely dispersed and subdued, so as to be easily managed by the people of Connecticut with the aid of the Mohe- gans and Narragansets. Capt. Stoughton remained in the Pequod country till near the last of August, and continued to send his reports of proceedings, by which we see that they were scouting, and destroying the enemy s crops and keeping the wretched fugitives from returning to their former homes. Soon after August 20th they sailed for home, landing at Block Island on the way, and burning and destroying the poor homes and grow ing crops of the helpless Indians with useless cruelty. Then they sailed homeward from their rather inglorious campaign, and arrived in Boston on August 26. This, in brief, is the story of the "Pequod War," gathered from all available authorities known. JTo the comparatively weak colonies of that day it threatened destruction. The prompt and daring, though sanguinary work, of Capt. Mason and his men, with the superiority of their arms, together with the hos tility of the other tribes for the Pequods, enabled them to strike the crushing blow, which, practically, finished the war. The result of this war was that the Indians of New England were so dismayed at the resistless force of the English soldiers, that for nearly forty years there was no further formidable outbreak, though they knew that they were wronged, cheated, and oppressed in many ways by the colonists. Some time after the war was over, the actual number of the Pequods still surviving was found to be about two hundred. In 1638, a treaty was concluded between the Colonies, Narragansets, and Mohegans, by which the surviving Pequods were equally distributed between the two larger tribes, forced to adopt their names, and drop their own forever. ) The Feouod lands became the property of Connecticut Colony. 20 THE PEQUOD WAB. These were hard conditions for a proud arid warlike race to sub mit to. Especially hard was the case of those who were obliged to submit to the rule of Uncas, whom they regarded as the real cause of their downfall. They were a constant source of disturb ance between the two ruling tribes. At one time a party of them withdrew from Uncas, and joining with a few Niantics, returned to their old home and settled. Capt. Mason was sent out, and with the aid of Uncas and his hundred Mohegans, and forty of his own men, he despoiled them of their corn, newly harvested, and drove them from their wigwams, which were burned. The Pequods, about equally distributed between the Mohegans and Narragansets, were a constant source of jealousy and trouble. Canonicus and Miantonomo, as well as their ally, Ninigret, the Niantic Sachem, distrusted Uncas as the pliant tool of the English, and a constant spy upon themselves, reporting all their acts sus piciously and falsely. At last, in 1643, upon some special provo cation from Uncas, Miantonomo resolved to punish his enemy. He led a large company of his warriors secretly into the Mohegan country; but the crafty Uncas was on his guard, having his spies set as usual upon every move of the Narragansets. Selecting an advantageous place, with his accustomed cunning, he concealed a large number of his warriors behind rocks and bushes, and then showed himself with a few, and signalled for Miantonomo to meet him for a parley between the lines, pretending to propose a per sonal duel to settle the trouble. When he had lured his enemy into the desired place, he gave his men the signal, by falling flat upon the ground, and they at once leaped out from their coverts and shot a furious volley of arrows at Miantonomo and rushed forward to surround him. He, hoAvever, having on an English corselet, was not harmed by their arrows, and turning fled towards his own lines. His warriors did not withstand the furious charge of the Mohegans, and in the flight he became separated from them, and, cumbered by the heavy corselet, was overtaken and overpowered by his foes. Uncas would have administered punishment straightway, prob ably, had not a swift messenger come to him from Mr. Samuel Gorton, of Warwick, threatening dire vengeance from the English should he harm the captive Sachem in the least. While it is probable that Mr. Gorton s threat saved the Narraganset Sachem from immediate death, his friendship was harmful to the captive s interests with the colonial authorities, who looked upon Gorton as a heretic and outlaw. Uncas turned his captive over to the custody of the court officers at Hartford, to await the session of the United Commissioners in September, he being in the mean time committed to prison. Then this " Star Chamber " of the Puritans took up the case, and by the most infamous decree which blots the pages of New England histor} T , condemned the brave Sachem of the noblest of the native tribes to a cruel and shameful ENGLISH PROTECT UXCAS. 21 death. Nothing can excuse the heartless prejudice and cold blooded injustice of the decision. He had been the faithful ally of the English from the beginning. He had not truckled to them, like the crafty and treacherous Uncas, but his course had been always honorable and self-respecting. By the Court s decree Miantonomo was given over, with cold brutality, to his mortal enemy to be executed according to his will. And so he was led back into the Mohegan limits, and near the scene of his capture, was killed with a blow of the tomahawk, in the hands of a brother of Uncas. The place of his execution is in the eastern part of the present town of Norwich, Connecticut. The Narragansets never sought to retaliate upon the English for this act of injustice. They under stood Uncas to be the author of their chief s overthrow, and bided their time to mete out vengeance to him. There was always, however, a feeling that the Narragansets had not forgotten nor forgiven the death of their chief, and this suspicion was diligently encouraged by the Mohegans. After the death of Miantonomo, his young brother, Pessacus, succeeded him, and Ninigret, his kinsman, and chief of the Niantics, became an influential leader among the Narragansets ; and many of the Pequods assigned to them had joined his tribe and added much to its warlike qualities. While Miantonomo was in prison at Hartford, the Narragansets had been encouraged by Uncas that he would liberate him upon the payment of certain sums of wampum. These sums had been gladly raised and paid to the crafty Uncas, who, in the end, repu diated the agreement, in which course he was afterwards supported by the English, as in all other matters. In the spring of 1644, Ninigret, having secured a number of guns and drilled some of his men in their use, fell upon a large company of Mohegans and slew a number, wounded many more, and so frightened Uncas that he was obliged to call on his English friends to protect him. He was shut up in his fort for a long time, fearing capture or death from his foes. The English, nothing loath to find a pretext for war against the Narragansets at any time, immediately began to raise an armament to vindicate the cause of their favorite. But Ninigret and Pessacus, the chief Sachems, now, of the Nar ragansets, appeared by their deputies at Hartford, and arranged to cease hostilities until after planting next year. They promptly renewed the war next year, or at least some slight acts were so construed by Uncas in his report to the Colonies. Again the Colonies advanced to his assistance, and promised to put forty soldiers in the field at once for the defence of Uncas. These were sent at once under the command of Lieut. Humphrey Atherton and Sergt. John Davis. The commission of Atherton was simply to protect Uncas in his fort, against his enemies. This company was sent from Boston, and companies from Hartford and New Haven were to join them in the Mohegan country. These were only the advance of a much larger force which the Commissioners 22 THE PEQUOD WAK. decided to raise. Great preparations were made, and officers com missioned for an invasion in force of the Narraganset country. Major Edward Gibbons, of Charlestown, was appointed Com mander-in-chief, John Leverett, Captain of the Massachusetts company ; Francis Loyal, Surgeon, and a levy of men was ordered and companies were organizing and drilling in Boston, when a delegation of Narraganset chiefs appeared before the Court to explain matters and assert their friendship for the English, but declaring their hostility to Uncas. Another partial treaty was concluded by the Indians agreeing to pay a large indemnity for the expenses of the preparation for war. After the partial treaty of 1645, Pessacus withheld the Nar- ragansets for several years, though Ninigret was constantly on the alert to find cause and opportunity to strike the hated Mohegans. Uncas, on his part, was constant in his complaints and rumors of his enemy s evil designs. The smaller Colonies, Connecticut and New Haven, were urgent in demanding the action of the United Commissioners against the Niantics, and this, of course, involved the other Narragansets. The payment of wampum to settle the expense of the preparations of the Colonies against the Niantics in 1645, to which Ninigret had agreed, was held over him as a constant demand, severe, if not actually dishonest. Some of the Pequods had escaped from servitude and taken refuge with him, as a kinsman. The Long Island Indians, too, made complaints of certain depredations against them ; and at last, in 1653, the Com missioners decided to declare war, and evidently meant to crush the whole Narraganset people and reduce them to servitude as they had the Pequods formerly. The Commissioners of Massa chusetts were in the minority, and were overborne by those of the other three Colonies, who were strenuous for war. The Gen eral Court of Massachusetts supported their own Commissioners in their decision that there was not a sufficient cause, as yet, for war. As this Colony, on account of wealth and population, was to furnish two-thirds of all means and men, her decision for the time prevailed. Next year, however, September, 1654, the Massa chusetts Commissioners so far retracted as to join in sending for Ninigret to attend them at Hartford and answer the complaints against him. He refused to attend and declared his war against the Long Island Indians to be just, as they had killed a Sachem s son and sixty of his men. He demanded that the English " let him alone." It was, thereupon, voted to send a force of twenty troopers and forty-foot soldiers to enforce the Commissioners demands. It was also voted to levy two hundred and seventy foot and forty horsemen out of the several colonies to prosecute the war. Major Simon Willard, of Groton, was appointed to the chief command of this force. The Massachusetts troops mustered at Dedham October 9th and marched to Providence, and thence along the westerly shore of Narraganset Bay to the Niantic TROUBLE WITH NINIGRET. 23 country. The officers of the Troopers were Capt. Wm. Davis, of Boston ; Lieut. Peter Oliver and Cornet John Stedman, while Richard Waite was Commissary. The following officers were appointed over such companies as were " to go out if neede should require : " 1st. James Oliver, captain ; Roger Clap, lieutenant ; John Hull, ensign; and 2d, Sam l Appleton, captain; Rich. Sprague, lieutenant ; Benjamin Sweet, ensign. Sergt. John Barrell was commissary to the Foot Companies. The New Haven and Connecticut contingent of forty men did not reach them until the 16th, when Ninigret had had ample time to retreat into his fastnesses, whence he could not be dislodged. It seems by Major Willard s letter from " Paucatuck 19* of 8 th Mo., 1654," that he was hampered by his lack of commission, as it was taken for granted that Ninigret would be found at his usual place ; he lacked information as to the charges against the Sachem, the Connecticut men by Thomas Stanton being depended upon to furnish details, who was unable. The Major, however, acting with prudence and candor through friendly Pequods, suc ceeded in getting Ninigret to surrender all the Pequod subjects who would leave him, and to permit them to set up an inde pendent tribal estate under the direction of the Commissioners. Additional details of this affair, and the men engaged, will be given in the Appendix. Major Willard secured a fairly satisfac tory covenant with Ninigret, and also an advantageous arrange ment with the subject Pequods, and returned to Boston and dis banded his forces on October 24th, being upon the service sixteen days. The Pequods were settled in separate communities, and rulers appointed of their own, under the Colonial authorities. Cusha- washett, alias Harmon Garrett, was appointed over the villages at Paquatucke and Weguapeuge, and Robin, alias Casasinamon, at Nemeacke and Naweacke. Later these were settled, the first in Stonington, and the latter in what is now the town of Led- yard. In 1850 the Ledyard settlement still retained 989 acres of land, and twenty-eight persons of the greatly degenerated Pequod stock ; in the Stonington, 240 acres and fifteen persons. THE WAR WITH PHILIP OF MOUNT HOPE. The next Indian war of New England, which claims attention, is that of 1675-77, known as " King Philip s War ; " so called from the name of the recognized leader of that war, whose Indian name was Metacom or Pometacom, or Metacomet, but whom the English called Philip. He was the second son of Massasoit, who at the settlement of the English at Plymouth and Boston seems to have been chief sachem of all the various tribes and fragments of tribes living between the Charles River and Narraganset Bay, and including that part of Rhode Island east of the Bay, and also the Cape Cod tribes. The rule of Massasoit was probably rather indefinite both as to limits of territory and extent of authority over the subordinate chiefs. While Massasoit seems to have been the acknowledged head of the tribes within the limits above named, the league between the chiefs of the tribes was evidently very loose, and held mostly for convenience in defence, and perhaps for the settlement of difficulties between individual tribes. The territory of this Sachem was bounded upon the west by the Nipmucks and Narra- gansets. But a very great proportion of this had been sold by the Sachems before the opening of the war. Massasoit had sev eral children, three of whom are known to us by name : Wam- sutta and Metacom, who came to Plymouth about 1656, and at their own request received English names from the Governor, who " christened " them " Alexander " and " Philip." A sister of these was the wife of Tuspaquin, chief of the Namaskets ; she was called by the English " Amie." Mention is made of another son and also a daughter, but I have not proper authority for their names. Alexander married a Sachem s daughter, or widow, of the Pocasset tribe, and after his death, soon following Massasoit s, 1661 or 62, she returned to her own people, and ruled there with influence and ability until the war ; when her second husband, Petananuet, Petonowowett, or " Peter Nunnuit " (as he is some times called), took sides with the English, she, possibly reluc tantly, joined the fortunes of Philip, who had married her sister Wootonekanuske, and had great influence with her. Massasoit had always maintained a cordial and firm friendship with the English ; and it would seem that Alexander also was somewhat of his father s nature and disposition. The moment, however, which saw Philip raised to the place of power, gave sig nal of a far different course of conduct on the part of the Wam- panoag Sachem. The limits of his father s olden territory had been greatly reduced before he came to power. The English had SOME CAUSES OF PHILIP S WAR. 25 purchased and otherwise absorbed a large proportion of their lands. Philip kept on selling and surrendering, till at last, as early as 1670-1, he began to feel the pressure of civilization upon their hunting and fishing grounds as well as cornfields. The Court at Plymouth itself had interfered and forbidden the trans fer of certain parts of the Wampanoag territories, and thus doubtless saved the Indians in various tribes a home. Pokano- ket, the hereditary home, was thus saved to Philip s people ; and here he lived at the time of the opening of the war. This place was called by the English " Mount Hope," and it is now embraced in the town of Bristol, R.I. It will not be necessary to discuss the causes leading up to the war. It is enough to say here, that the English had assumed the government of the country, and followed their course of settle ment with small regard to the rights of the natives. In some of the plantations, the settlers purchased their lands of the Indians, as a matter of precaution ; partly that they might have that show of title in case any other claim should be set up in opposition to theirs, and partly to conciliate the savages, whose hostility they feared, and whose friendship was profitable in the way of trade, in furs and other products of the hunt. The Indians were always at disadvantage with the English, in all the arts of civilized life. The English paid no heed to Indian laws or customs or tradi tions ; and ruthlessly imposed their own laws, customs, and re ligious ideas, with no apparent thought of their intolerance and injustice. They made treaties with the savages in the same terms which they would have used had they been dealing with a civilized nation. They made out deeds, in language which only the learned framers themselves could understand. In brief, the Pilgrims and Puritans mostly looked upon the Indians as heathen, whose " inheritance " God meant to give to his people, as of old he had dealt with Israel and their heathen. There were some, how ever, who, with Rev. John Eliot, believed that the Indians had immortal souls, and that they were given to God s people to edu cate and save. But there was nothing which the rulers of the Indians resented more persistently, nor complained of more fre quently, than the attempts of the Christians to convert their people. Indirectly one of these converted Indians was the im mediate cause of the opening of hostilities. There wero many grievances of which the Indians complained ; but they had not the foresight to see the inevitable result of the constantly increas ing power of the English, in their acquisition of land, and multi plying of settlements. It was only when they felt the pressure of actual privation or persecution, that they began to think of opposition or revenge. Their chiefs had been summoned fre quently before the English courts to answer for some breach of law by their subjects ; several times the English had demanded that whole tribes should give up their arms because of the fault 26 KING PHILIP S WAR. of one or a few. The Indians lived mostly by hunting and fish ing, and at the time of the war used fire-arms almost wholly. They had learned their use and bought the arms of the English, nearly always at exorbitant prices. They were expert in the use of their guns, and held them as the most precious of their possessions. The order to give these over to the English, with their stock of ammunition, was regarded by them as robbery, as indeed in most cases it was, as they seldom regained their arms when once given up. We can now see that from their standpoint there were grievances enough to drive them to rebellion. But our forefathers seem to have been unable to see any but their own side. But now to the story. John Sassamon (Mr. Hubbard says Sausaman) was the son of a Wampanoag Indian who, with his wife and family, lived in Dor chester. They had been taught by Mr. Eliot, and professed the Christian faith. The son John was the pupil of Mr. Eliot from his early youth, and was made a teacher among the Christian Indians at Natick. Mr. Hubbard says that " upon some misde meanor " there, he went to the Wampanoags, where he became the secretary and interpreter of the chief, to whom he was a most valuable assistant and trusted adviser. He was soon prevailed upon by Mr. Eliot to return to Natick, where he became a preacher, while still preserving friendly relations with Philip and his tribe. In 1672-3 he was at Namasket as preacher among the Indians, whose chief was Tuspaquin, whose daughter Sassa mon had married. While here he discovered that a plot was in process, extending among many tribes, to exterminate or drive away the English settlers from the country. This plot Sassamon disclosed to the authorities at Plymouth, and afterwards the story was told to the Massachusetts authorities ; and Philip was summoned to answer to the charge. At the examination, where nothing positive could be proved against Philip, he found by the evidence that Sassamon had betrayed him, and he immediately condemned him to death in his council. The sentence was car ried out January 29, 1674-5, while Sassamon was fishing through the ice upon Assawomset Pond. His executioners were brought to punishment, and it was discovered that the deed was done by Philip s order. The trial was in March, 1675, and the principal actor, Tobias, and his accomplice, Mattashunannamoo, were exe cuted as murderers, June 8, 1675 ; while Tobias s son, who was present but took no part in the crime, was reprieved for one month and then shot. After the execution of the two in June, Philip threw off all disguise as to his plan, and pushed his preparations as diligently as possible. The plan had been to com plete preparations and include all the tribes in New England, so that a simultaneous assault could be made upon all the settle ments at once. This plan was spoiled, and probably the settle ments saved from destruction, by the impatience of the leader s TROOPS MARCH TO MOUNT HOPE. 27 vengeance. While Philip s preparations went forward, the authorities thought best not to make any immediate military demonstration further than the placing of a guard by the various settlements to prevent a surprise. They thought Philip would soon tire of holding his men in arms and training, so that they could get him in their power. But his company increased, and the younger warriors began to demand some open act of hostility. At last they began not only to insult the English settlers in the nearest settlements, by their words of insolence and threats, but to shoot their cattle and plunder their houses. The Indians in creased greatly in numbers, from the neighboring tribes, many "strange Indians" appearing among them, and most of their women and children being sent away to the Narraganset country. At Swansy they appeared in considerable numbers, and used all their ways of provocation to induce some act of resistance from the settlers ; and at last, upon June 24th, one man was so en raged at the shooting of his cattle and the attempt to rifle his house, that he shot at an Indian, wounding him. Upon this the Indians began open and indiscriminate hostility, and on that day eight or nine of the English at Swansy were killed and others wounded. Two men were sent for a surgeon, but were waylaid and slain, their bodies left upon the road. Messengers sent from the English authorities to treat with Philip and prevent an out break, came upon the bodies of the men slain in the highway, and speedily turned back. The Colonies awoke to the fact that an Indian war was upon them, but supposed that a few companies sent down to Swansy would at once overawe the savages and reduce them to submission. A speedy muster was made, both at Plymouth and Boston, and on the afternoon of June 26th, five companies were mustering or on the march from the two colonies. The details of the account of the war will be found in the body of the following chapters. Here only a brief outline of current events can be given. The first company of infantry from Boston was made up from the regular military companies of the town. A company of cavalry, or "troopers," was gathered from the regular organization in three counties. A third company, of " volunteers," was raised about the town and vicinity, from all sorts of adventurers, seafaring men and strangers, with a number of prisoners who had been convicted of piracy and condemned to death, but were now released to engage in fighting the In dians. Capt. Daniel Henchman commanded the first company, Capt. Thomas Prentice the troopers, and Capt. Samuel Mosely the "volunteers." These three companies marched out of Boston on the 26th and 27th and arrived at Swansy on the 28th, having formed a junction with the Plymouth forces under Major James Cudworth and Capt. Fuller, these having been in the field several days already. The forces quartered about the house of Rev. John Miles, the minister at Swansy, whose 28 KING PHILIP S WAR. place was nearest the bridge leading over the river into Philip s dominions. Some of the troopers that evening rode across the bridge and had a slight skirmish with the enemy. On the 29th, Major Thomas Savage arrived with another company of foot with Capt. Nicholas Paige s troop. Major Savage took command of the Massachusetts forces ; while, according to the custom in the United Colonies, the senior officer of the colony in which the forces were engaged at the time became commander-in-chief. The present seat of war being in Plymouth Colony, Major Cud- worth was thus the commander of the whole army. On June 80th, the troopers, supported by Mosely s company, charged across the bridge for a mile into the woods, driving the enemy before them into swamps, with a loss of five or six, Ensign Perez Savage being severely wounded on the English side. This charge so frightened the Indians that they fled, in the night, out of their peninsula of Mount Hope, across the channel to Pocas- set, now Tiverton, R.L, so that on the next day when the whole force marched over into Mount Hope, and marched back and forth sweeping the country with their lines, they found no enemy. The forces were engaged several days in scouting the neighboring country in search of the Indians, not yet knowing that the main body were in Pocasset. Then orders came from Boston for Major Savage s forces to march into Narraganset, to enforce a treaty with that powerful tribe, and prevent their junction with Philip. The}^ found the country apparently deserted, few except the very aged being left in any of the villages. Neither Canonchet nor any of his leading Sachems could be found. The officers, however, spent several days completing a very ceremonious treaty with some of the old men whom they were able to bring together. Canonchet after wards treated the whole matter with scorn as being a farce. In the meantime the Ptymouth forces passed over to Pocasset and found a body of Indians, and had a skirmish with them. Capt. Fuller was in command, and Benjamin Church conducted a part of the force, which became engaged with a much larger force, and after hard fighting were drawn off with difficulty by the tact and courage of Mr. Church, after inflicting serious injury upon the enemy, and suffering little loss themselves. After this the Indians retired into the swamps about Pocasset, and were held at bay until the return of the Massachusetts forces ; when all marched together for concerted action against their enemies. On July 18th the combined forces arrived at the Pocasset swamp, and made a resolute attack upon the enemy concealed in the thick underbrush, from whence at the first volley they killed five and wounded seven of our men. After this volley the enemy retreated deeper into the swamp, where it was impossible, night coming on, to follow them. The commanders in council PHILIP RETREATS TO POCASSET SWAMP. 29 concluded that they had the enemy now enclosed securely within the swamp, whence it was impossible to escape, if a suitable guard were left to watch. Major Savage and the Massachusetts men returned to Boston, except Capt. Henchman s company of one hundred men, who, with the Plymouth forces, remained at Pocasset. Capt. Henchman began to build a fort there, which might serve as a stronghold for the English and might guard the entrance to the great swamp. The English were deceived by the apparent easy conquest of both the Wampanoags and Narragansets, and believed they had overawed them and set their hostility at rest, and now might take their own time in crushing Philip and thus finishing the war. Plymouth Colony had been engaged from the first in seeking to conciliate the tribes, in their bounds, which were related to Philip. Through the efforts of Mr. Benjamin Church, a resident of Seconet, who was acquainted on pleasant terms with nearly all the tribes in the colony, negotiations were held with Awa- shonks the squaw-sachem of the Seconet Indians, and Weetamoo the squaw-sachem or " queen " of the Pocasset tribe. Awashonks and most of her people passed over into the Narraganset country at the opening of active hostilities, and thus avoided joining Philip ; but Weetamoo and her people were swept along with him in his retreat towards the Nipmuck country. Plymouth companies were abroad, too, scouting the country in the effort to protect their settlements, exposed, like Dartmouth, Middle- boro , etc. They also established a garrison at Mount Hope after Philip retreated to Pocasset, to prevent his return. The entrance of Philip into the Pocasset swamps compelled the cooperation of the hesitating Weetamoo, and afforded him a safe hiding-place to recruit and prepare for his flight northward. In the meantime the Massachusetts authorities had begun negotiations with the various Western tribes. Seven of the principal towns had been visited and treaties made with each. On July 16th Ephraim Curtis returned to Boston and reported the Quabaugs gathered at a great island in a swamp beyond Brookfield, and showing a defiant and hostile spirit. The Council immediately sent Capt. Edward Hutchinson, escorted by Capt. Thomas Wheeler and his mounted company, with Curtis as guide, to find the Indians and bring them to terms. The company, accompanied by some friendly Naticks, arrived at Brookfield on August 1st, and immediately sent Curtis with the guides to arrange for a meeting next day. The Quabaugs, whose leader was the famous Muttaump, agreed to come next day to a plain some three miles from Brookfield to meet the English. The next morning, the company, with three of the chief men of Brookfield, rode out to the appointed place, but found no Indians. Urged by the Brooktield men, but against the earnest 30 KING PHILIP S WAR. remonstrance of the Naticks, they rode forward towards the place where Curtis met them the day before. But coming to a narrow defile between a high rocky hill and an impenetrable swamp, and riding single file, they found themselves caught in a great ambuscade of the Indians, who let them pass along until they were able to surround them, and then rose altogether and fired into their column at close range. They killed eight men outright and wounded five, including Capts. Htitchinson and Wheeler, the former mortally. The English were forced to retreat, fighting, up the hill ; and, under the skilful conduct of their Indian guides, were able to make a safe retreat to Brook- field, where they gathered the people and fortified a house just before the Indians came sweeping furiously down upon the village. Here they defended themselves against great numbers for several days, till Major Willard and Capt. Parker came with a company and reinforced the garrison, when the enemy retired. At Pocasset, Capt. Henchman continued building his fort, and Philip was making ready for his flight. The English seem not to have contemplated the possibility of a general war, nor to have at all appreciated the gravity of the present situation in the col onies. Philip with all his fighting-men and the greater part of his own and Weetamoo s people, escaped across the river and passed through the open plain in Rehoboth, where they were dis covered by some of the settlers. A scouting party from Taunton made the discovery that it was Philip s Indians who were thus escaping. The situation of affairs may be briefly stated. Capt. Henchman was guarding the swamp wherein Philip and his people were supposed to be securely trapped. Major Cudworth and Capt. Fuller were at Dartmouth with a company of one hun dred and twelve men. Lieut. Nathaniel Thomas, of Marshfield, was at the Mount Hope garrison with twenty men. At Rehoboth a company of Mohegan Indians under Oneko, under convoy of Corporal Thomas Swift, arrived from Boston on the 30th on their way to Capt. Henchman at Pocasset. Upon the alarm, Rev. Mr. Newman, of Rehoboth, began to organize a company of volunteers for the pursuit of the Indians. Lieut. Thomas, with a small de tachment, happened to come to Rohoboth on the 30th, and hear ing of the escape, hastened back to carry the news to Capt. Henchman, and urge his cooperation. Lieut. Thomas then, on the 31st, took eleven men of his Mount Hope garrison, and being joined by Lieut. James Brown, of Swansy, with twelve men, marched in the pursuit. The Rehoboth men, with some volun teers from Providence and Taunton, led by the Mohegans, had started earlier upon the trail of the enemy. Lieut. Thomas and his party overtook the others at sunset, and after a brief council- of-war, sent out their scouts, Indian and English, to discover the movements of the fugitives. Having found that they had en camped for the night, and apparently not suspecting pursuit, the PHILIP ESCAPES TO THE STIPMUCKS. 31 English left their horses with a guard, and, with the Mohegans in the van, marched silently forward to a field, at a place called " Nipsachick " (said to be within the present town of Burrillville, R.I.). The night being very dark, they were forced to wait for light. At dawn they made their attack upon what proved to be Weetamoo s camp. The Indians were taken by surprise and fled, leaving everything behind them. But the Mohegans and English rushing forward found themselves confronted with Philip s fight ing-men entrenched behind trees and rocks ready for battle. Adopting the tactics of the enemy, the English and their allies engaged them fiercely until 9 o clock, when still fighting desper ately, but with powder nearly spent, the hostiles sullenly retired, leaving many of their dead upon the field. Some twenty-three of the enemy were killed, it is said, including a prominent chief, Woonashum, called by the English, Nimrod. Of the English, two were killed and one wounded. Near the close of the fight, Rev. Mr. Newman and a party came up, bringing supplies. Capt. Henchman arrived after the fight, having sailed to Providence and marched up thence, with sixty- eight soldiers and sixteen friendly Indians. He immediately took command, but concluded not to push the pursuit until next day. The Rehoboth. and Providence men returned home, to bring up supplies for the further pursuit. They hastened back next day with all speed, but found to their great disappointment that Capt. Henchman had not moved until that same day, giving the enemy a full day s start ; and Lieut. Thomas and his party overtook him on the evening of August 3d, at a place called by them in the report, " Wapososhequash." The enemy were beyond pursuit, a part (Weetamoo s people, except the fighting-men) having turned off into the Narraganset country, while Philip and the rest passed into the great forests beyond Quabaug. The Mohegans went to their own country on August 4th, accompanied by Lieut. Brown and a small party, to Norwich, to secure provisions and news of the enemy. After awaiting the return of this party three days, Capt. Henchman, on August 7th, marched back to Mendon, meet ing Capt. Mosely with a company of dragoons coming up from Providence with supplies. Next day Capt. Henchman went up to Boston, and the Rehoboth men returned home. Capt. Mosely was left in command at Mendon. Capt. Henchman was relieved of command in the field and was sent to bring off his men re maining at Pocasset. Mendon had been attacked July 14th, by a party of Nipmucks, led by Matoonas, and six or more of the settlers were killed while at work in their fields. When the Indians returned from their siege of Brookfield, they met Philip and his people in the woods and told him of their exploit. He was greatly pleased, and gave some of the chiefs presents of wampum, and promised them fresh supplies of ammu nition and arms. The Brookfield affair had the effect of bringing 32 KING PHILIP S WAR. in the faltering tribes, and Philip s coming confirmed the plan to clear the Connecticut Valley of English settlers. Massachusetts Colony raised several companies to protect the frontiers. Capt. Mosely with his own and Capt. Henchman s men marched from Mendon, and Capts. Thomas Lathrop of Essex County with a fine company, and Richard Beers of Watertown with another, marched to Brookfield, where their forces were joined by Capt. Watts of Connecticut with two companies of English and Indians. Major Willard took command of this force, and broke it into several parties in order to better protect the several settlements. These companies were engaged in scouting the frontiers and guarding supplies sent up to the various garrisons. The Springfield Indians, hitherto pretending friendship, fled and joined the hostiles on the night of August 24 ; and the English, pursuing, had a sharp fight with them at a swamp near Mt. Wequomps, losing nine of their own men. The English troops were concentrated at Iladley under the general command of Major Pynchon. On September 1st the Indians attacked Deerfield, burning most of the houses and killing one of the garrison soldiers, and withdrew. On the 2d they fell upon Northfield, where many of the people were abroad at work in the fields, and the women and children at the houses in the town. The assault was from all quarters at once, and many were killed in the fields and as they escaped from their houses to the garrison. The Indians burned most of their houses and drove away their cattle. On the 3d, Capt. Beers, with thirty mounted men and an ox-team, was sent to bring off the garrison of Northfield, not knowing of this attack. This force on the next day was ambushed at Saw-Mill Brook, near North- field, and Capt. Beers and some twenty of his men were killed. Next day Major Treat with a hundred men marched up to North- field, finding and burying the dead of Capt. Beers company, and then bringing off the garrison. It was now decided to strengthen the garrisons and act upon the defensive. Upon September 18th Capt. Lathrop with his company was sent to convoy teams bring ing loads of grain from Deerfield to Hadley. A strong ambuscade was made at a place known since as " Bloody Brook," and there the Indians encompassed and massacred nearly the whole company, some eighty, including the teamsters. Only eight or ten escaped. The number killed was between sixtj and seventy. Capt. Mosely came hastily from Deerfield upon hearing the shots, and engaged the great company of several hundreds of Indians, charging in amongst them with intrepid fury which drove them headlong before him into the woods and swamps ; but, finding them gather ing in immense numbers and seeking to surround him, he threw out his lines to prevent being flanked, and began a cautious retreat ; when Major Treat coming upon the field, the Indians, seeing the reinforcements, fled. These terrible reverses threw a gloomy, superstitious fear over THE NARRAGAXSET CAMPAIGN. 33 the Colonies. The English troops, hitherto despising the Indians in war, now seemed helpless before them. On September 26th the Indians assaulted Springfield, west of the river, burning the houses and barns. On October 5th the enemy made some dem onstrations at Hadley; the soldiers were drawn from Spring field to strengthen the garrison ; the Indians fell upon the latter village and destroyed it, before the companies could return to save it. After this blow, Major Pynchon begged the Court to appoint a commander of the forces on the river in his place, and Major Samuel Appleton was appointed, and by advice of the Council garrisoned the various towns not abandoned, and then withdrew the other troops to Boston. The Connecticut troops helped to garrison Northampton and Westfield, and the Indians withdrew to their winter camps. Philip had long since gone into winter quarters above Albany. But now the Colonies determined to strike the Narragausets in their own country before they should be able to join the hostiles. A great muster was made in three colonies, and an army of one thousand men was raised and equipped, half of which was sent from Massachusetts. The Narragansets were entrenched in a very strong position in a great swamp in what is now South Kingston, R.I. It was claimed that great numbers of Wampan- oags and other hostiles were among them finding refuge, and they were defiant and threatening. The English forces under com mand of Gen. Winslow, of Plymouth, gathered at Wickford, and on December 19th, 1675, marched some twenty miles through intense cold and a heavy snow-storm, to the swamp ; the waters had been frozen by the severe cold, and this fact made it possible for the English to reach the rude fortifications. Without waiting for any organized attack, the Massachusetts troops, being at the front in the march, rushed forward across the ice in an impetuous charge, and into the entrance, where the Indians had constructed rude flankers, and placed a strong block-house in front, so that the first to enter were met with a terrible enfilading fire from front and flanks, and were forced back for a time ; but others coming on pressed into the breach, and, though suffering severe losses, at last stormed all the fortifications, drove the enemy from every line of entrenchments within the fort, and out into the woods and swamps beyond. They set fire to the wigwams and store-houses of the savages, in which were burned many of the aged, women, and children. Then taking their wounded, the English took up their march back through the deep snow to Wickford, where they arrived the next morning. The details of this fight, as well as the subsequent movements of this campaign, are given at length in the chapters of which this chapter is the compendium, and are briefly passed here. The Narragansets kept well out of the way of the English army, and made many pretences of negotiating peace; but at last, about 34 KING PHILIP S WAR. January 26th, having made several raids into the settlements, and captured numbers of cattle and horses, Canonchet with his strong rear-guard took up his line of retreat for the north, and two days afterwards the army, some twelve hundred strong, marched in pursuit. The Mohegans and Pequots, among the Connecticut forces, led the pursuit, and had several sharp skirmishes with the enemy, always retreating northward. This running fight was kept up for several days, until provisions having failed and no base of supplies possible, the General abandoned the pursuit and marched his troops to Marlborough and thence to Boston. The men suffered severely in this march, from hunger, and it was known for several generations as the " hungry march." The Connecticut forces separated from the others on February 3d, and the main body of the army arrived in Boston on the 8th and were dismissed. A company under Capt. Wadsworth was left at Marlborough to guard the frontiers and neighboring towns. Canonchet and his great and warlike Narraganset tribe, maddened by what they believed their wrongs, and thirsting for vengeance, were now joined with Philip and the other hostile tribes, and all within an easy day s call, except Philip and his band, who still remained in their retreat beyond Albany. The time was critical for the settlements ; prompt action was necessary on the part of the Indian leaders, to keep their young men in courage and training. Upon February 10th the Indians in great force fell upon Lancaster, and nearly destroyed the town. They killed or took captive fifty of the people. Among the captives was Mrs. Rowlandson, wife of the minister. One garrison-house was saved by the arrival of Capt. Wadsworth and his company from Marlborough. On February 21st a strong body of the enemy surprised Medfield, although a large force of soldiers was then in the town. There were no guards set, nor other precautions taken. The soldiers were scattered about in the houses, and the Indians placed ambuscades in front of each house, and shot them down as they rushed out upon the alarm. The enemy were frightened away by the firing of a cannon, and crossed the river, burning the bridge behind them. Another army was now raised and sent to the Connecticut River towns, to protect them, and try to bring the enemy to battle. There were said to be two great fortified camps : one near the u Wachusett Hill," and the other at Menameset, beyond Brook- field. The army was under command of Major Thomas Savage, and consisted of three foot companies and a troop of horse from Massachusetts. Connecticut sent several companies of English and friendly Indians. A number of Christian Indians from the Naticks went with Major Savage. The army marched to Mena meset, March 2d-4th, to find the enemy gone. They pursued them to Miller s River, across which they escaped. It was thought that this great body of the enemy would now fall upon WAR IN THE RIVER TOWNS, WEST. 35 the western towns, so that the army marched thither, abandoning the design upon " Wachusett Hill " encampment. Major Savage disposed his forces to guard the towns. On March 14th an attack was made upon Northampton, but was repulsed with severe loss to the enemy. On the 24th they appeared at Hatfield, but finding it well garrisoned made no attack, though driving off some horses and cattle. The Indians began to prepare for plant ing fields along the river ; and Canonchet with a body of his men went back to their country to bring up seed-corn, of which large quantities were there stored. It is probable that a large company went towards Plymouth Colony, a small party of whom destroyed the house and family of Mr. Clarke at Plymouth village. March 17th they burned Warwick. Plymouth Colony sent out a com pany of fifty men under Capt. Michael Peirse, of Marshfield, to protect its frontiers. A party of twenty friendly Indians under " Capt. Amos " was joined with Capt. Peirse. This company marched to Seekonk, and there had a sharp skirmish with the Indians on the evening of March 25th. Next day, supposing they had beaten the Indians, they pursued them and were drawn into an ambush and surrounded, near Patuxit River, with great numbers, so that they were obliged to fight to the death. The whole company, including the officers, were killed, together with eight out of the twenty Indians. The enemy, too, lost very heavily. March 28th and 29th the Indians burned seventy houses and thirty barns at Providence. In the meantime, in Massachusetts the enemy were not idle. Lurking parties hovered about Groton, plundering the vacated houses, and driving away any stray cattle within safe reach. On March 13th they fell upon the town in force. The people were gathered in five garrison-houses. One of the garrison-houses was captured, but the people mostly escaped to another. The other garrison-houses were stoutly defended. The Indians burned the unfortified houses and withdrew. On March 26th, the fatal day of Capt. Peirse s destruction, they burned sixteen houses and thirteen barns at Marlborough. Capt. Brocklebank, then in command at Marlborough, sent out a party in pursuit, who overtook and surprised the enemy at night sleeping about their fires, fired into their midst and put them to flight. On the same day, at Longmeadow, a party going to Springfield to church was ambushed by a small company of Indians, and several were captured and killed. Finding the campaign to have failed in its main object, the Council ordered Major Savage to withdraw his troops, leaving Capt. Wm. Turner, with a hundred and fifty men, to garrison the towns. April 7th the army marched homeward. But now the Connecticut authorities, fearing a return of the Narragansets to their vicinity, in numbers such as overwhelmed Capt. Peirse, mustered a mixed company of English and Indians, 36 KIXG PHILIP S WAR. and sent them into the Narraganset country under command of Capts. Denison and A very. These, guided by a captive whom they had taken, surprised and captured Canonchet not far from the Patuxit river, where he was encamped with a few of his men, while the great body were scattered, scouting and foraging. He was soon after executed by Oneko, by the judgment of the English authorities. The death of Canonchet was really the death-blow of the war, for he was the real leader of all active operations at this time. Philip was still the chief instigator, however, and now more than before, became, for the time, the controlling mind of a larger number than ever before. There were dissensions, however, and many of the chiefs began to mur mur and some to threaten against him as the cause of all their troubles. Some of the river tribes began to show signs of weakening, and proposed negotiations with the English. Philip withdrew to the stronghold near Wachuset with such as adhered to him, and with Quinnapin, and such of the Narragansets as followed him. The Indians were still active, and watched every chance to strike a blow. They came to Marlborough on April 18th and burned the abandoned houses of the settlers. Capt. Brocklebank commanded the garrison there and refused to be drawn out into the ambuscades, which, before the burning, the Indians had set. On April 20th they crept down and encom passed the town of Sudbury. On that day Capt. Wadsworth marched up from Boston with a company of fifty men, passed through Sudbury, and doubtless the lines of the enemy, without any knowledge of their vicinity. He forced his march to the garrison at Marlborough, where they arrived about midnight on the 20th, and without delay, leaving their recruits, took those relieved to come home, including Capt. Brocklebank, and came back towards Sudbury. The great numbers of Indians had en compassed the town, and in the morning of the 21st began to burn outlying houses, to draw out the inhabitants from the garri son. They soon made a furious and persistent attack on Haines garrison from morning till mid-day, but were beaten off, until rumors of reinforcements from various quarters caused them to withdraw to meet these. Edward Cowell and eighteen troopers coming to the relief of Sudbury were attacked, but escaped with only four killed ; they turned back, suspecting the ambush laid for them. Capt. Wadsworth soon after arrived by another road, and meeting with an outpost of the enemy, rushed forward to engage them, and, as usual, they soon found themselves sur rounded by great numbers, and were forced to a position on a hill, where most of the company fell fighting, including Capts. Wadsworth, Brocklebank, and Lieut. Sharpe. Some sixteen of the company managed to escape to a mill, and there defended themselves until relieved. A company from Watertown arrived soon after Captain Wadsworth, and crossing the river, made a WAR IN THE RIVER TOWNS, WEST. 37 brave attempt to get to the hill to join him in his desperate fight, but were nearly surrounded themselves and forced to retire. Capt. Hunting with a company of Christian Indians and a squad of troopers arrived from Chaiiestown late in the afternoon, in time to rescue the men at the mill. After this fight, in which they struck such a terrible blow, and so close to Boston, too, they seem to have retired to their several camps, and soon to have gathered to their great fishing-places in order to take the run of fish. Capt. Turner was still in command of the garrisons at the west. From captives who had escaped, and scouts here and there, came rumors of a great company of Indians fishing at the " Upper Falls " of the Connecticut. Capt. Turner and his officers were anxious to strike a blow against the enemy, and Connecticut authorities were applied to, and promised speedy reinforcements. On May 12th the Indians made a raid into Deerfield meadows and stampeded some seventy head of cattle belonging to the English. Roused by this fresh outrage, the people urged retaliation, and Capt. Turner and his officers deter mined to attack the Indians at their great fishing-place at once. On May 18th the whole company of soldiers and volunteers, about one hundred and fifty, mustered at Hatfield, and marched out at evening towards the " Falls." They eluded the outposts of the enemy, and at daylight arrived undiscovered at the camp of the Indians at the fishing-place. The savages were asleep in their wigwams, and the English rushed down upon them and shot them by scores, pointing their muskets in through the wig wam doors. No resistance was possible, and those who escaped the first fire fled in terror to the river, pursued by the soldiers, and were cut down or driven into the water without mercy; many were drowned attempting to cross the river. But it was soon found that there were several other great bodies of the Indians, above and below the Falls on both sides of the river, and these began to swarm towards the fight. Capt. Turner now prudently began a retreat, having struck his blow. As the soldiers retired the enemy gathered in great numbers upon rear and flanks, seeking to force the English into narrow defiles Capt. Holyoke commanded the rear-guard, and checked the enemy by stout fighting, but for which, it is likely, the whole command would have been lost. Capt. Turner led the advance, and while crossing Green River was shot down by Indians lying in wait. Capt. Holyoke then led the company back to Hatfield, fighting nearly the whole way. There the killed and missing numbered forty-five. A few came in afterwards, reducing the number of the lost to about forty. It is estimated that some two hundred Indians must have been destroyed. The blow struck by Capt. Turner greatly intimidated the enemy, though the retreat was so disastrous to the English. The tribes became divided and demoralized. They seem to have 38 KING PHILIP S WAR. broken up into small wandering parties. Philip, with large num bers of his adherents, went down towards Plymouth. Massachu setts sent troops to the western frontiers again, and also to aid Plymouth. The operations in the field were mostly the pursuit of non-combatants, the aged, and women and children. Large numbers of the Wampanoags and Narragansets had now returned with Philip to their own country. Small parties from time to time plundered and killed as opportunity offered. The colonists were roused to new activity at the evident weakening of the Indians. Aid was sent to Plymouth, under Capts. Brattle and Mosely ; and Capt. Henchman did good service in the parts about Brookfield. Major Talcott, with a mixed force of English and Indians, about five hundred in all, came up the river and marched into Hadley about the llth of June, and was quartered there on the 12th, when the Western Indians, some seven hundred strong, made their last great assault in force in these parts. The town was quite strongly garrisoned besides this reinforcement, of which probably the enemy knew nothing. - The attack was alto gether unexpected and was furious and determined, but the repulse was decided and sanguinary. Major Talcott then led his force down into the Narraganset country, where, about the 2d of July, he encountered a great body of Indians, and driving them into the woods and swamps slew great numbers, and took many captives. The plight of the savages was pitiful ; without ammunition, without leadership, without countiy or hope of any sort, they found no mercy now at the hands of their olden foes, the Mohegans and Pequods, nor yet the English. The remaining operations of the war in these parts were simply the hunting down of almost defenceless enemies. The colonial authorities issued a proclamation, calling all those Indians who had been engaged in the war to come in and surrender, submitting themselves to the judgment of the English courts. Many parties sought to take advantage of this, but were captured upon their approach by scouting parties, and treated as captives. Some of those who had been prominent in the war and could not hope for mercy, escaped to the eastward and put themselves under the protection of Wannalancet and his Pennacooks, who had remained neutral. Some fled farther to the east, and there incited war. The constant success which the Connecticut troops had always had after their use of the Mohegans and Pequods, was a plain rebuke to the Massachusetts colonists for the numerous disasters from which the Christian Indians might have saved them, if they had trusted and employed them. As soon as Capt. Hunting and his Indian company were put in the field, this appeared. The Indians in small parties skulking in woods and swamps might have eluded English soldiers for years, but as soon as other Indians were employed, escape was impossible. At the close of July, many of Philip s followers had been DEATH OF PHILIP, AUGUST 12, 1676. 39 taken, and his wife and several of his chief men were captives or had been killed. With a small band of his followers he was hiding in the swamps at Mount Hope and Pocasset. English scouting parties were active in all parts of the colonies hunting down the trembling and unresisting fugitives, and especially Philip. Benjamin Church was among the most active in hunting and bringing in the Indians, and when one of Philip s men came to betray his chief, he found Mr. Church at Major Sanford s in Rhode Island, with his scouting party of English and Indians a short distance away. Upon the news of Philip s hiding-place and the offer of the Indian to lead thither, Mr. Church gathered as many as he could enlist in addition to his party, and, under the lead of the Indian deserter (who acted, it is said, from motives of revenge for his brother s death, by Philip s hand, because he advised him to make peace with the English), the party marched with great secrecy to Mount Hope. Mr. Church arranged his attack with skill, and came upon Philip s party unguarded and asleep, and Philip springing up and attempting to escape to the swamp near by, was confronted with two of Mr. Church s guards, an Englishman and an Indian. The English man s gun missed fire, but the Indian, named " Alderman," imme diately fired and shot the great chief through the breast, so that he fell forward into the water of the swamp, upon his face, dead. Philip was killed August 12th, 1676. Weetamoo s party, the sad remnant of her tribe, had been captured on the 7th, and she, trying to escape across a river, was drowned, and, her body being found, her head was cut off and paraded in the public streets. After Philip s death, his chief counsellor, Annawon, led the rest of the party out of the swamp and escaped. With his party he soon after surrendered to Mr. Church. The death of Philip was practically the close of the war, though hostilities continued for some time after, and at the eastward for a year or more longer. At Dover, Major Richard Walderne had held command of the military interests and operations in those parts. He was a trusted friend of Wannalancet and the neighboring Indians. Under the proclamation the old chief and his people came in without fear, as they had taken no part whatever in the war. There were many Indians with them, however, it was suspected, who had been among the hostiles, and now wished to come in with the Pennacooks and secure the advantages of their influence in giving themselves up. They began to come in at Dover about the first of September, and when, on the 6th, the companies, sent to the eastward under Capt. Hathorn, arrived at Dover, there were some four hundred there, including the Pennacooks. In some way the immediate surrender of all these was received, probably by Major Walderne s great influence with them. They were then disarmed, and as the Massachusetts officers insisted upon treating them all as prisoners of war, Major Walderne was 40 KING PHILIP S WAR. obliged to send all, save Wannalancet and his " relations," down to Boston to be tried there by the Court. The number sent was about two hundred. Some of the Southern Indians, having lost all except their own lives, passed to the Eastern tribes and were active in exciting to hostility. The local Indians had been hostile the previous year, committing depredations from the Kennebec to Portsmouth. In the summer of 1676, it is thought that many who had been among the Indians in the war, came to these tribes and caused much of the trouble which ensued. The day before Philip s death the Indians fell upon the settlers at Falmouth, and killed or carried away some thirty-four persons and burned their houses. Further eastward also the settlements were attacked. It was upon these occasions that Capt. Hathorn s force was sent to these parts. They marched on from Dover on September 8th, as far as Falmouth, Capt. Hunting s Indians scouting the woods. This expedition was not of much avail, as the Indians easily eluded the troops, being only war parties without the encumbrance of women and children. In November, 1676, a company was sent up into the mountain regions of New Hampshire to break up a winter encampment of the Ammoscoggin and Pigwacket Indians, who had been active in the hostile movements at the eastward settlements during the summer and fall, and were now said to be gathering into winter quarters in a great fort, near " Ossapy Lake." After a severe march, the fort was discovered, but no signs of Indians, and after scouting in small parties some twelve miles beyond this fort, they burned the same, and marched back to Berwick, having been gone nine days. In the meantime the Peuobscot sagamore, Mugg, or, as he was afterwards called, " Mogg Hegone " (and in Whittier s poem Mogg Megone), came to the English in behalf of Madockawando, the sachem of Penobscot, to treat for peace, and the return of the English captives. A treaty was concluded at Boston, November 6th, 1676, by which Mugg agreed to return all the captives and goods taken from the English, and offered to remain with the English until the same was done. Two vessels were fitted out, and sailed to Penobscot, where they arrived the first week in December, and found the great chief, Madockawando, who received and treated them kindly. He delivered to them two captives, who were then with him, and Mugg was allowed to go up into the country, to try to bring down some others, who were said to be at another camp. He did not return; and the vessels, after a few days waiting, sailed to Pemaquid, where they received some more English captives, and returned home. Among the captives received at Pemaquid was Thomas Cobbet, son of Rev. Thomas, of Ipswich. He had been among the savages for several months, and his interesting story of his captivity gave much and correct informa- WAR AT THE EASTWARD. 41 tion in regard to the strength, habits, temper, and intentions of the Indians and their other captives. Soon after that, another captive, Francis Card, escaped and brought later news, and one item of great importance was that Mugg had returned to the Indians on the Kennebec, who were the real leaders in the war in those parts. He said that Mugg boasted greatly of the trick he had played upon the English, and threatened great things to be done against them in the spring. He gave a minute description of the country, the con dition of the Indians, and the easiest approaches to their places of encampment. He said that the numbers of the Indians were not so large as reported, their war-party, in full force, being not over a hundred men. The captives with them were well, and not abused, except they were made to work for their captors. Stirred up and encouraged by this report, the Council at Boston raised a force of two hundred men, of whom sixty were Natick Indians, and sent them away by water, to the eastward, the first week in February ; Major Waldron, of Dover, being Commander-in-chief of the expedition. The forces were at Blackpoint on February 17th, and sailed eastward along the shore, landing in Maquoit Bay, where Capt. Frost with his company had a skirmish with a body of the savages, without much loss on either side, and fol lowed next day with an attempt at a treaty. Thence they sailed around to the Kennebec, and landing at Arrowsick Island, left a part of their force there, to build a fort and establish a garrison. Major Waldron, with a part of the company under Capt. Frost, went to Pemaquid and ransomed some captives there ; but, dis covering a plot to destroy himself and a small party who went on shore to treat with the Indians, he called his soldiers ashore, and attacking the enemy furiously, drove them to their canoes which they had near by, killing some, among whom was the sagamore Mattahando, leader in this affair. Sailing back to Arrowsick, Major Waldron gathered his forces together, leaving a small garrison at Kennebec, and went home to Boston, where they arrived safely, without the loss of a man, on March llth, 1677. In April following an attempt was made by the Massachusetts authorities to enlist the Mohawk Indians against the hostile savages upon the North and Eastern borders. Major Pynchon, of Springfield, with Mr. James Richards of Hartford, and twelve men as a guard, made a journey to the Mohawk country to arrange for their cooperation. This action was taken with the advice of Gov. Andros, of New York, and some of the Indians did really come into the borders of New Hampshire and Maine ; but the distance was so great from their country that little was achieved except by the terror inspired among the Eastern tribes, by the rumor of their coming. 42 KING PHILIP S WAR. This measure was questioned by many as to its lawfulness, in employing heathen to light the battles of the Lord ; but the Gen eral Court fell back upon the scriptural precedent of Abraham employing the Amorites, and so justified its somewhat ques tionable proceeding. The Indians on the Kennebec were not deterred from hostilities, which were renewed by the killing of nine of the garrison left the year before, at that place. So the Massachusetts Court at once called upon the other colonies to assist them in raising a new force to send into those parts. Up to the present time, Massachusetts had borne the whole expense of the Eastern wars, but now call them to raise their proportional part of one hundred English, and two hundred Indian soldiers, to rendezvous at Blackpoint. But in the meantime Massachusetts had acted with promptness in sending Capt. Hunting to bring the remaining garrison at Kennebec, and strengthening the gar risons at Wells with a company under Capt. Benjamin Swett, and at Blackpoint with another company under Lieut. Tippin. In May, the Eastern tribes, elated by their success in driving the English out of their country, gathered all their forces against the above garrisons. The Indian leaders in this campaign were Symon, a renegade Christian Indian, and Mugg, above mentioned, both wary and skilful, and well acquainted with the country around, and with the English people and their habits. The Indian forces under these leaders at this time were well-tried men from the Penobscot, Kennebec, and Ammoscoggin tribes of the Tarratines, ranking as fighters next to the Pequods and Mohawks. They were well equipped and supplied, probably by the French in Canada. It does not appear that either of the other colonies sent men to assist in this campaign, and the force that was raised by Massa chusetts was too small, and the English part of it/ was mostly of young and untried men and boys who had seen no service except in garrisons. They seem also to have entirely underrated the numbers and temper of the enemy. On the 13th of May, the Blackpoint garrison had beaten off a large body of the Indians after a fierce assault of three days, on the last of which Lieut. Tippin had shot and killed the leader, Mugg ; when the Indians had gone away towards Wells and York, as told above. On July 28th, Capt. Swett, with forty young English recruits, and a com pany of thirty-six Natick Indians, landed at Blackpoint garrison- house, the Indians being under the command of Lieut. James Richardson. Next morning the enemy with quite a large party appeared not far from the fort, when Capt. Swett drew out his whole force, with a number from the garrison, and pursued them with headlong haste about two miles, when, at the edge of a hill, with a dark swamp on each side, they found themselves am bushed, after the old fashion at Brookfield, Deerfield, Sudbury, etc., whose lessons, after two centuries, the American soldiers AVAR AT THE EASTWARD. 43 have not fully learned. Half the English were shot down at the first volley, and the raw young lads were completely panic- stricken, and unable to make any defence. The Captain with a few tried men rallied and attempted to bring off their wounded and make good a retreat to the fort. The odds were too heavy against him, and having received many wounds, he was at last surrounded and overpowered by the foe, and fell not far from the garrison, still fighting. Lieut. Richardson fell near the first onset. Forty of the Eng lish and twelve of the Natick Indians were killed at the time. It is not known how many the enemy lost ; but they made no further attempt upon the garrison and soon retired. The next hostile move of these Indians was in a new direction. They cap tured no less than thirteen fishing-vessels with their crews and loads along the Eastern shores. In August of this year (1677), Gov. Andros, of New York, sent a ship with a force of men to Pemaquid, which, when the Indians understood, they soon, for some reason, came to proper terms of peace, returned the English captives and the captured vessels into the hands of the New York soldiers, by whom they were soon returned home. Yet another act in this long tragedy was to come. The scene changes to Hatfield, where, September 19th, the people of that village were engaged in raising a house, having no thought of any Indian hostility in the colony. Suddenly they were set upon by a party of River Indians, forty or fifty in number, who had crept about them so secretly that they were unarmed and utterly help less. Some were shot down from the frame of the building. Twelve were killed outright, and some twenty more were made captive and carried to Canada. The story of the captivity and redemption of these last, by the two brave Hatfield men, Ben jamin Wait and Stephen Jennings, is one of the most heroic and interesting of the whole war. The Indians killed one man and captured three more at Deerfield that same day. This was the last act of any considerable importance in the war known as " King Philip s War," the particulars of which are to be related in the following chapters. THE BEGINNING OF HOSTILITIES IN KING PHILIP S WAR. I. CAPTAIN DANIEL HENCHMAN S COMPANY. AT the opening of the war, the colonial militia was quite efficiently organized. Each county had its regiment of " trained soldiers." The regiments of Suffolk and Middlesex counties consisted of fifteen companies of Foot and one of Cavalry each. The Essex regiment was of thirteen Foot and one Cavalry ; the other counties smaller. There were seventy-three" organized companies in the Massachusetts Colony, besides an independent cavalry company called the " Three County Troop," made up in Suffolk, Middlesex and Essex. The highest military officer of the colony was Major General Daniel Denison, of Ipswich. The highest regimental officer at this time was Major, or Sergeant Major. These local companies were not sent on active service out of their towns, but men were impressed from the number and placed under officers appointed for special service by the Council. Each company of Foot had a Captain, Lieutenant, Ensign, Clerk, Sergeants, Corporals, and a Drummer. Cavalry had Cornett instead of Ensign and a Trumpeter and Quartermaster. The\ regular number of privates in foot companies was seventy, in ) the cavalry fifty. On special service it was more. The pay of soldiers was 6s. per week, and 5s. was paid for their " dyet." There is no way of determining the rate of pay from Hull s Journal, as all payments are "on acct" and do not specify time of service. Plymouth Colony paid the private soldiers 2s. per day, Drummers 2s. 6d., Sergeant 3s., Ensign 4s., " Lieftenant " 5s., Captain 6s. A "Chyrurgion" or doctor was attached to each expedition. A chaplain also generally served with each expedi tion. The price paid for horses was 18d. per week. Prices of Clothing, "Wastcoats," 6s., Drawers 5s. 6d., "Stockins" 2s., Shirts 6s., Shoes 4s. On the Mount Hope expedition the soldiers used the Old Matchlock musket, the " Regulation " weapon of that time ; but it was afterwards discarded as not so serviceable as the Flintlock A 7? 46 KING PHILIP S WAR. or " Snaphance." There were no bayonets in use, but each com pany at first had a number of Pikemen, soon found to be useless in an Indian fight. The " Matchlock " was an exceedingly cumbrous affair, and was too long and heavy to fire at arm s length, so that each soldier was obliged to carry a " rest " (a crotched staff pointed at the foot with iron, and attached to his wrist by a string). No. 7 of the orders in musket drill, " Elton s Tactics," was, " Put the string of your rest about your left wrist." The Indians always used the Flintlock, and used slugs, or heavy shot instead of bullets. The other equipments of a foot soldier were a " Snapsack," six feet of match or fuse, a Bandoleer, which was a leathern belt passing over the right shoulder and under the left arm and containing a dozen or more round boxes each hold ing one charge of powder ; a bag of bullets and a horn of prim ing-powder was also attached to this belt. These matters will be more fully treated in the Appendix. BEGINNING OF HOSTILITIES. A brief survey of the state of affairs in Boston on June 24th, 1675, when news of the attack of the Indians on Swansea, and Plymouth Colony s appeal for aid, arrived, may be in place here, especially as in Massachusetts Records there is nothing relating to the matter from the adjournment of the Court on May 12 until it was called together on July 19th. It is to be regretted that the records are lost, as we know many important meetings were held in this time. I insert the following fragments, pre served in Mass. Archives, vol. b 7, as testimony of the energy which the Court displayed in answering the appeal of the sister colony. The following is a portion of a letter from the General Court of Massachusetts Colony to Plymouth Colony, in answer to her appeal for assistance: June 24. 1675. Hon rd S r According to what I writ you yesterday we are now con vened in Council to Consider of your desire of a supply .of some men from hence and we have resolved to rayse one hundred foot and 50 horse that shall be speedily upon their march towards Swansey .... and for the furtherance and better management &c we have commis- sionated our faithful friend Major Thomas Savage &c. [June 24, 1675.] Att a meeting of the General Court on the 24. June 1675. Ordered that the Secretary issue out a warrant to the Con stable of Boston to Impress forthwith five Able and Special horses for the service of the country, and that Capt Savage and Capt Oliver have charge of them, and their men each of them one. Capt Richard is voted to goe forth in this Expedition (who shame fully refused the Employment). 1 This parenthesis is added by another hand. This captain was John Richard, of the 6th Company, and as he was afterwards a trusted officer in the colony, probably the Court did not agree with the remark of the anonymous writer. BEGINNING OF HOSTILITIES. 47 Capt Daniel Henchman was chosen and voted to goe forth as Capt of 100 men for the service of this Colony on y e designe to go to Plym outh CoF. Capt Thomas Prentice is appointed to be Capt of the Horse. To the Militia of the town of Boston, Cha. Camb. Watertown, Roxbury, Dorchester, Dedham, Brantrey, Weymouth, Hingham, Maulden You are hereby required in his Majesty s name to take notice that the Gov r & Council have ordered 100 able souldjers forth with impressed out of the severall Towns according to the proportions hereunder written for the aid and assistance of our confederate Plym outh in the designe afoote ag 8t the Indians, and accordingly you are to warne af sd proportions to be ready at an hours warning from Capt Daniel Henchman who is appointed Captain and Commander of the Foote Company that each souldjer shal have his armes compleat and Snapsack ready to march and not faile to be at the randevous. To the Committee of The Council is adjourned till tomorrow at 8 of the clock at Rox bury. E. R. Sec y. (i.e. Edward Rawson, Secretary.) The special commission of Capt. Henchman for this service is also in the Archives, vol. 67. To D. H. Capt. with the Consent of the Councill for the Colony of Mass, in New England. Whereas you are apoynted Capt of a foote Company to Serve in this Expedition for the assistance of our neighbors of Plimouth against the insolences and outrages of the natives, these are to wil and require you to take charge of the said Company of foote, mounted as dragoons, & you are to command and instruct your inferior officers and souldjers according to military rules for the service and saftey of the Country, and you to attend such orders from tyme to tyme as you shal receyve from your superior Commanders or the Council of this Colony. Past 25 June 1675 E. R. Secy Signed by y e Gov nr Daniel Henchman appears in Boston as early as March, 1666, when he was employed at a salary of .40 per annum " to assist Mr Woodmancy in the Grammar Schoole and teach the childere to wright ; " was on a committee with Capts. Gookin, Prentice and Beers, to lay out "the new Plantation at Quansigamond Ponds" (now Worcester), and settle its affairs, in 1667. He was thereafter the chief manager in that settlement, and received the largest number of acres in the first division. He was admitted freeman in 1672 ; was appointed captain of 5th Boston Company, Colonial Militia, May 12, 1675, and commissioned for the special expedition, as above noted. He is seen to have been one of the most trusted officers of the Court. 48 KING PHILIP S WAR. Capt. Daniel Henchman m. (probably in England) Sarah, dau. of Hezekiah Woodward, Gentleman, of Uxbridge, Middlesex, England, who, in his will of the 22 : Feb y 1674, gives " to the five children of my daughter, Sarah Henchman deceased, by Daniel Henchman of Boston in New England," the sum of "twenty pounds apiece, to be paid at their respective ages of twenty-one years." Then he gives all his lands and tenements in Ireland, to the said Daniel Henchman, in trust for the said children. Their five children whose names are known to us were Richard, Hezekiah, Nathaniel, Susanna b. 7 : June : 1667, and William, b. 28 : July : 1669, and died sometime before March 29 : 1673. Sarah, the wife, died ; and Capt. Henchman married, 26 : April, 1162, Mary, dau. of William Poole of Dorchester, by whom he had William (2), b. 29; March, 1673; Jane, b. 25: May : 1674 ; Daniel, b. 16 : June, 1677 ; and Mary, b. 1 : June, 1682. He died at Worcester, 15 : Oct. 1685. His Widow Mary, and his sons Richard and Hezekiah administered upon his estate, which by inventory of 29: Apr. 1686, was rated 1381 : 13 : 09. The surname appears in various forms, as Hinchman, Hincksman, Hinksman, etc. Two of his descendants, through his son Nathaniel, have graduated at Harvard. CAPT. HENCHMAN MARCHES FROM BOSTON TO MOUNT HOPE. Pursuant to his commission, Capt. Henchman marshalled his company, and, on the afternoon of June 26 : 1675, marched out from Boston in company with the " troop of horse," under the com mand of Capt. Thomas Prentice, of Cambridge. At Dedham they halted for an hour, during an eclipse of the moon, which occurred on that evening. Then they marched on as far as " Woodcock s Garrison " (Attleboro ), where they arrived in the morning, and waited until the afternoon, when Capt. Mosely with his company of " Volunteers " overtook them, and the three com panies then marched on together to Swansey. They arrived at the house of Rev. John Miles, the minister of Swansey, where they quartered for the night. This was on June 28. On the 29th, Major Thomas Savage, commander-in-chief of the Massa chusetts forces, arrived with his company and the Troop* of Capt. Nicholas Paige. Capt. Plenchman s men were engaged in the movements through Mount Hope, and scouting about the country until July 4th, when they marched back to headquarters at Swansey. At a council of war, July 5th, in consequence of orders received from Boston by hand of Capt. Hutchinson, it was determined to march all the Massachusetts forces into the Narraganset country. Accordingly the next ten days were spent in the march thither, and the treaty with the Sachems. During this time the Plymouth forces under Major James Cudworth, Capt. Matthew Fuller, and Benjamin Church were pursuing Philip into Pocasset ; and Mr. Church " hasted over and borrowed HENCHMAN AT MOUNT HOPE. 49 three files of Henchman s men and his lieutenant," to assist in the enterprise. On July 15th, all the Massachusetts forces marched to Rehoboth, on the 16th to Mattapoisett, on the 17th to Taunton, and on the 18th to Pocasset Swamp, where they immediately attacked the Indians, and five English were killed and seven wounded. Owing to the darkness the forces withdrew. It was decided to withdraw all the Massachusetts troops except Capt. Henchman s company, which remained with the Plymouth forces at Pocasset. Maj. Savage, Capts. Paige and Mosely marched back to Boston, and Capt. Prentice with his troop scouted towards Mendon. It was determined to build a fort at Pocasset and " starve Philip out." But near the end of July Philip escaped by water, either wading at low tide, or " wafting " on rafts, and passed into the Nipmuck country, abandoning about one hundred of their women and children in the swamp. Capt. Henchman appears not to have known of Philip s escape until news was brought him from the mainland on July 29th, 30th, etc. Letters to him from Rev. Noah Newman and Peter Hunt, of Rehoboth, were enclosed by him in one of his own to the Governor (which I have copied here), and are preserved in the Mass. Archives, vol. 67. In itself it is the best explana tion of this time at hand. Fort Leverett was at Pocasset, built by Capt. Henchman s company and named for the governor. Letter of Capt. Daniel Henchman to the Governor. Hon a Sr. Fort Leverett, July 31, 1675. Since my last (of the 28 th ) the Generall the 29 th day landed here one hundred men, his designe to releeve Dartmouth being as reported in some distress ; Past nine of the clock last night Lt Thomas brought me the two first enclosed letters from Rehoboth and Mr James Brown with him to press my going thither, which with what strength I could was yeelded to, (I having just finished the South East flanker of the fort so farr as to be a good defence for my men) drew my company together by a false alarm in the night, some being at a distance get ting stockadoes ; and provided for our March before day taking six files with me and the 17 Indians (all now left) and leaving five files behind to be going on with the work, and the Brigandine ; About 11 of the clock a second post came to acquaint me with the third enclosed letter. Mr Brown and the L* being gon to endeavour the giving of notice to the Gen 11 to Warwick and the Narragansett Indians to head Philip, At break I shipped my men in a sloope for Seaconk and while under sail Mr Almie brought word that one Dan. Stanton of the Island at his returne yesterday from Dartmouth affirmes that severall parties of Indians with their armes to the number of about 80 surrendered themselves to that garrison for mercie, who have secured them in an Island by them. After my Company was landed within two miles of Seacouk before all were on shore an other letter came to me from L Thomas A.dvising to land at Providence being 50 KING PHILIP S WAR. nearer to the enemy, I strait remanded my men on bord, gave each one 3 biscakes, a fish and a few raisons with ammunission which may last two or three days, I make bould to encloss to coppies of the letters sent least anything in my whurry might be omitted ; The Lord preserve and spirite you still for this his worke ; my humble service to all those worthies with you ; I would gladly know of y r Hon rs welfare ; and begg the prayers of all to God to qualifie me for my present imploy ; being the unfittest of many yet pardon my con fused lines being begun at my Quarters and patched vp in several places Hon rd S r Y r Hon rs Humble Servant D. HENCHMAN. The above letter was written evidently on the passage to Sea- konk and Providence. He landed at Providence next morning, and marched twenty miles in pursuit of the Indians before he came up with the Plymouth forces and the Mohegans, who had been sent to him from Boston, but had been met by the Rehoboth men and persuaded to join them in the pursuit of Philip ; these had come up with Philip s rear, and had a sharp fight before Capt. Henchman arrived. The Mohegans were now passed to his com mand, and the troops being wearied with the long march bivou acked till morning, and the Plymouth forces returned to Rehoboth, leaving to Capt. Henchman the further pursuit of Philip, which was renewed next morning. With his six files (consisting of sixty-eight men), the fifty Mohegans and the seventeen Naticks, Capt. Henchman marched into the Nip- muck country as far as the "second fort," to a place called Wapososhequish, August 3, but without finding Philip ; and hav ing continued the pursuit until provisions were exhausted and all were tired out to no purpose, the Mohegans returned to their home, and Capt. Henchman marched his force to Mendon, meeting Capt. Mosely with sixty dragoons on the way with supplies. August 8, Capt. Henchman went down to Boston to get orders from the Governor and Council, and left most if not all his men at Mendon. (August 16, a part of them were in charge of Capt. Mosely, twelve of whom were detailed to Chelms- ford garrison by him.) Capt. Henchman received his instruc tions for future proceedings in a letter from Gen. Daniel Denison, commander-in-chief of Massachusetts Forces, given August 9th, 1675. This letter commanded him in brief to return to his men left at Pocasset, to fetch them and the " provisions and ammuni- sion " off. He was to advertise the Plymouth commander of this design, arid if said commander wished him to remain there, to await further orders from the Council ; otherwise to turn over the fort to the care of the Plymouth forces, and march his men to Boston and disband them until again called out by the Coun cil. In his march to Pocasset he was given authority to press horses and guides, or require them of the various constables of HENCHMAN RETURNS TO BOSTON. 51 the towns passed, and on his return likewise. On his return he was to draw off the Massachusetts " souldjers " at Woodcock s garrison, and also at Mr. Hudson s house, unless he should deem it unsafe, Hudson being of our colony whom we are to take care of." Plymouth Colony preferred to take charge of the fort, and Capt. Henchman brought his soldiers home to Boston as com manded. " It will be understood that the Soldiers of Plymouth Colony played an important part in this campaign, reaching the seat of war before those of Massachusetts ; arid the account of this will be given in separate chapters, after Massachusetts is finished. The letters of Rev. Noah Newman, Lieut. Nathaniel Thomas, Peter Hunt, and Mr. James Brown s part are all of interest and importance." The following list, gathered from John Hull s Account-book, from date to date, and here arranged together, doubtless shows the Company which served under Capt. Henchman, in this campaign. As to the spelling of the names, I have not departed in the least from the original. It must be remembered that the names were entered in the Journal from " Debentures " made by the clerks of companies, and the names at the first were entered on the company rolls as each man was understood to pronounce his own name, and unless the clerk was acquainted with the name, he spelled it by the easiest method ; hence many strange varia tions appear. The Ledger account often has two forms for the same name. The list of Soldiers credited with Military Service under Capt. Daniel Henchman. Thomas Burges. John Hills. John Lewis. John Angel Benjamin Negus John Chapman. Robert Smith. William Manly. Thomas Irons. Samuel Perkins. Hugh Taylor. David Jones, lames Whippo. Theophilus Thornton Nathaniel Osborne. Samuel Davis. Henry Kerby. Ephraim Hall. August 20, 167.3. 02 06 02 Richard Gibson. 02 07 00 00 06 00 Thomas Williams. 02 07 00 01 14 03 01 15 02 Joseph Ford. Samuel Walles. 00 06 10 01 06 06 01 15 02 02 02 00 02 02 00 William Bently. Peter Edgerton. John Bull. 02 07 00 01 15 00 00 16 02 02 08 00 Richard Brooks. 02 00 00 02 07 00 John Barrett. 01 10 00 02 07 00 02 07 00 02 07 00 Joseph Fiske. Joseph Tucker. Israel Smith. 01 10 00 02 05 00 00 12 00 02 07 00 Samuel Ireson. 01 10 00 02 07 00 02 07 00 August James Dichetto. 21 1675 00 15 00 02 07 00 02 07 00 Jacob Gully. Isaac Ratt. 01 14 06 02 04 06 01 07 00 Samuel Veze (als . Very) 02 07 00 PHILIP S WAR. 07 00 07 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 Samuel Daniel. 02 John Kemble. 02 John Russell. 02 Simon Groveling. 02 John Thorn. 02 Charles Damport. 01 Benjamin Bishop. 02 John Throp. 02 Solomon Watts. 02 Philip Coker. 02 John Jeffries. 02 Robert Wills. 02 07 00 Isaac Morris. 02 07 00 Nicholas Weymouth. 02 07 00 Nathaniel Jewell. 02 07 00 Samuel Mirick. 01 04 00 William Parham. 02 08 00 Thomas Roberts. 02 04 06 August 27 th or Ledger date 23 d John Hubbard. 02 07 00 JohnTebb. 02 07 00 Henry Timberlake. Ser^ 02 00 00 ThomasHitchboruZ/rwm r 01 11 00 John Taylor, Sergt. 02 Thomas Bishop. 00 Peter Bennett, Marshall. 01 Simeon Messenger. 01 John Polly. 01 John Essery. 02 Henry Harwood. Sergt. 03 Samuel Barber. 00 Phillip Jessop. 01 Charles Blincott. Sergt. 02 Isaac Amsdeu. 02 Henry Prentice. 02 John Streeter. 02 Abraham Hathaway. 02 James Johnson. Sergt 03 03 Isaac How. 01 11 Thomas Parker. 01 04 00 Joseph Peirce. 01 04 00 John Gates. 02 00 00 William Hopkins. 01 10 00 Ralph Hall, Clark 03 10 00 Thomas Wi<rfzl\,Ensigne 03 02 04 00 11 01 18 16 04 04 07 01 16 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 06 14 00 07 00 07 00 07 00 07 00 00 08 Richard Bennet. 02 Jobn Scopelin. 00 September 3 d 1675 Josiah Arnold. 01 W m Smallidge. 01. John Bucknam. 01 Enoch Greeuleaf , Lieut. 04 Samuel Johnson. 03 William Drew. 02 William Hardin. 01 John Cray. 01 Nathaniel Fiske. 01 John Miller. 00 John King. 01 James Ogleby. 00 Rowland Soley. 01 Thomas Region. 01 Thomas Hiucher. 01 Joseph Smith 01 Thomas Aliston 02 George Burkback 01 Daniel Magenis. 01 Henry Eliott. 01 Thomas Okerby 01 John Hastings 01 Edward Weeden 01 John Wiseman 03 Sept 14 th Joseph Priest. 01 Nathaniel King. 02 John Pemberton. 01 Osbel Morrison. 02 John Cross 01 Perez Savage. Ensigne 02 Roger Procer. 01 Robert Orchard. Sergt 02 September 21, 1675 David Church. 01 Samuel Johnson, Butcher 01 Thomas Traine. Ebenezer Owen. Matthew Stone. Nathaniel Kean. Benjamin Tower Jonathan Dunning. 00 00 00 01 00 01 07 00 07 00 15 02 19 04 19 04 10 00 07 00 07 00 04 06 19 04 13 06 06 00 11 00 07 08 19 04 19 04 04 00 19 04 07 00 19 04 19 04 04 10 19 04 04 10 19 04 03 06 05 08 02 10 01 00 19 00 06 06 08 00 04 10 01 00 17 08 05 08 10 04 05 00 07 00 04 10 10 04 17 06 FURTHER SERVICE OF CAPT. HENCHMAN. There was intensely bitter feeling about this time in Boston as to the way captive Indians should be treated. The interces sion of the venerable John Eliot and the strenuous advocacy of Capt. Gookin in their behalf, had created great animosity not HENCHMAN S FURTHER SERVICE. 53 only against themselves but all who advised moderate measures. Capt. Henchman seems to have been of the moderate party, and was therefore somewhat unpopular with most of the soldiers, and doubtless his apparent lack of success in the pursuit of Philip at Rehoboth added to this feeling with the people. But the court sustained and trusted him, and immediately reappointed him to service over one hundred men who met at Roxbury meeting house, but refused to march forth under his command, and demanded Capt. Oliver. The council compromised the matter and sent them Capt. Lake, but they are not credited with any service under him. Capt. Henchman seems to have been em ployed in August and September in regulating affairs in some of the outlying towns, and these men perhaps sei ved as his patrol or guard. Oct 5 1675 Richard Wood. 00 10 04 Ephraim Wilier, Corp 1 02 05 00 Thomas May. 01 19 04 Michael Bearstow. 00 10 04 Thomas Webb. 01 19 04 Edward Dickinson. 02 07 00 Jacob Bullard. 01 18 06 Samuel Whitney. 01 18 06 John Shattock 01 02 00 Daniel Keniday. 01 17 08 September 27th we find him at Chelmsford garrison in com mand, as we see by the following letter of that date. Capt. Henchman s Letter to the Governor. Chelmsford Sept 27, 75. [This was Monday.! Hon d S r In pursuance of my instructions ; I and my Lieut, met at Major Wil- lard s the last day of the week, with the Captaines of the severall townes directed to ; as well for the drawing of the Souldiers, as to ad vise with them ; for the first they promise they shall be sent to chelms- ford at an hours warning and so will be ready here by that time I have provission for them ; and that of absolute necessity for them will be powder shott biscake cheese and raisons, large and warme Wast-coats and drawers tobaco, some hatchets and a Chirurgion ; for the later the Major and rest of the officers will advise to no other motion than about this and other towns ; but I understanding the intent of the Ho d Coun cil to be that I should march to Pennycooke although not named in my instructions ; I think it need full to acquaint your Hon there with, and desire your express there unto. I have not farther at present but to subscribe S r your Hon" humble Servant (Mass. Archives, vol. 67, 269.) D. HENCHMAN. Major Willard was of Lancaster, but his house was in Groton, at what is now Ayer Junction; and the date was Saturday, September 25th. November 1st Capt. Henchman marched out of Boston towards Hassanameset (Graf ton) with a small body of men (20), and arrived at Medfield at 3 P.M. on the same day. The next morn ing he writes the Governor from that place. 54 KING PHILIP S WAR. Medfield Nov. 2 d 1675 Ho nd S r My orders directing me to the several places and times that my souldiers were to be ready at, Speded my march accordingly; and reached this place yesterday by three of the clock afternoon ; and had with me only 20 men that marched from Boston with me Since divers are come up, and all that at present I am like to have by nine of the clock last night. Several hear as well as myself have great thoughts how it fareth with Mendam, having not heard since they sent to Boston, I am hasting to march this morning but hoped if the men s refreshments had not given check to have been gon by moon rising, I cannot see by acct taken before I draw out that my number will amount to above 75, some sending short of what ordered and 37 discharged by order, I have not any officer but a Sergeant from Roxbury ; some men and the armes of others not fit for service, notwithstanding the strikt orders giveu by the Major. Our greatest danger (as I judged) if the enemy designs upon us this day, will be at a pass six miles from hence; the which I hope we shall look unto the Lord in the use of means to avoid ; some being to returne home this morning I thought it meet to give this acct. Begging your prayers for us I desire that all our supplications may be accepted for the Country and the interest of our Lord Jesus Christ therein ; and rest Hon d S r Your humble Servant I). HENCHMAN. [This is in a P. S.] When the Lord shall have brought us safe to Meiidam I shall attend the Major s orders there and wait for the recruits intended me. As will be seen by the above letter, the captain expected recruits to be ready and meet him at certain towns on the way, and was disappointed in receiving none, and also with the unfit- ness of those that came up afterwards, and in answer to this letter, the Court, on November 3d, ordered the " Major of Suffolk to send out of his regiment eighteen able men armed and furnished with ammunition and provision for ten days under the conduct of a fitt person to make Lieftenaiit," to recruit Capt. Henchman s company and search out the enemy at Hassanameset. The lieutenant chosen was probably Philip Curtis, of Roxbury, who was killed before he received his formal commission, I pre sume, as no order for his commission is found. Capt. Henchman marches to Mendon, arrives on the 2d at 4 P.M., and writes immediately that they " arrived all safe and found the t-owne in like condition," and " pressed four horses for Scouts to send to Hassanemeset." He found the inhabitants " drawn into two houses," and " in a pestered condition," and holds frequent meetings with them in order to prevail upon them to remain at Mendon contented. This and frequent scouting and reports took up his time until the arrival of the men from Boston. It seems also from this letter that he had not yet heard from Capt. Sill, as it was proposed, and was preparing to send his AT HASSAXAMESET. 55 soldiers home to Boston ; was intending that morning sending all his troopers, eight in number and three files of men ; but he gets orders from the Council by messengers from Capt. Sill. In order to meet Capt. Sill, fourteen miles away, he is forced to change a file of men with the garrison on account of their destitution of "clothes and shoes/ On the 9th, with his lieutenant and twenty-two mounted men, he rides to Hassanameset, and has a fight there, of which he writes the details on the 10th. In his letter he relates that his lieutenant, Philip Curtis, is killed, and Thomas Andrews also (one of the Mendon garrison) ; and mentions that his corporal, Abiell Lamb, outran himself in the attack, and that all his own and the lieutenant s men ran away from him in the fight except (one of his " old souldiers," as he thinks) Jonathan Dunning. The following list embraces those wlio served under Capt. Henchman from November 2d, and were credited November 30, as will be seen by the credits. The service was brief. Amongst these were eight troopers, which may explain in part the differ ence in credits. November Edward Barton. Isaac Heath. Henry Kirby. Jeremiah Wise. Benjamin Negus. John Leech. James White. John Good. Joseph Baternan. Edward E/veret. Richard Francis. John Kemble. Experience Orris. Samuel Ryall. Joseph Gridley. William Bodkin. William Hooper. John Tuckermau. John Canu. 30 th 00 01 1675 01 05 08 00 16 02 00 17 02 01 00 06 17 02 19 04 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 07 02 02 00 00 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 10 04 01 05 06 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 01 00 00 William Price. William Davenport. Thomas Smith. Joseph Bugby. Samuel Gardner. Simon Rogers Abiel Lamb. Richard Woods. Degory Sargent. Josiah Mann. John Malony. Francis Siddall. Hugh Price. James Harrington. Benjamin Gamlin. Isaac Morris. Josiah Holland. Joseph Wilson. Samuel Ruggles. Philip Curtis, Lieut. 00 14 06 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 11 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 19 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 01 19 04 01 19 04 00 17 02 00 17 02 01 00 00 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 17 02 00 17 03 On November the 12th the Council ordered Major Willard to send forthwith twelve troopers to Capt. Henchman. Many of the soldiers were now withdrawn and placed in garri son, and all available were pressed and mustered for the Narra- ganset campaign. Capt. Henchman s men were many returned home with him. Among the soldiers impressed in Boston for the Narragansett campaign, Dec. 3d, 1675, were the following from Capt. Hench man s local company : James Whipple, Samuel Jenkins, Walter 56 KING PHILIP S WAK. December 20 th 1675 Joshua Silverwood. 01 18 06 John Sherman. 01 18 06 John Corbin. 00 16 02 Henry Tite. Simon Yates. 01 16 02 00 10 00 Thomas Birch. 00 06 10 John Pierpont. John Necks. 00 16 02 01 14 02 John Griggs. Thomas Lawrence. 00 11 02 00 07 06 Joshua Atherton. 00 07 06 William Briggs. Nicholas Gray. Isaac Hubbard. 00 06 10 00 16 02 00 16 02 James Draper. January 25 1675. (N William Goswell. 00 16 02 .S. 1676.) 00 16 02 Cohone, James White, Thomas Jones, Thomas Stains, John Dereing, Robert Emory, Ralph Powel for Mr. James Lloyd, Francis Cooke for Mr. William Larrison. (Mass. Archives, vol. 68, 86.) Onesiphorus Tilston. 00 06 10 Thomas Jones. 00 16 02 Samuel Burnall. 00 16 02 John Spurr. 00 16 10 Lawrence White. 00 16 02 Thomas Cheyuey. 00 16 02 Thomas Bridentine. 00 16 02 Robert Woodward. 01 02 03 February 29, 1675-6 Joseph Bodman. 00 08 09 William Lyon. 00 10 04 John Parker. 00 16 02 March 24, 1676 William Elliot. 00 16 02 Joseph Clark. 00 09 04 April 24, 1676 Hugh Clark. 00 07 00 Thomas North. 01 13 04 Among the soldiers in the above lists were probably the twelve troopers sent out by order of the Council on November 12, 1675, and those who did not return to Boston until the later dates. It was the custom, I find, to punish the men by fines, and some times their pay would be withheld for several months, until on petition to the Council it would be paid, if the officer who com plained of their misconduct would recommend leniency and sign their " debenture " or bill for service rendered. On the minutes of the Council, of which a few fragments are preserved in the Mass. Archives, I find several instances of this kind ; one in the case of Magnus White, whose name occurs later, and one in a quaint letter from one Jonathan Adderton (Atherton), which declares that Capt. Henchman wrongfully accused him of " profa nation of y e Sabbath," when his only offence was the cutting up of an old hat and putting the pieces in his shoes to relieve his galled foot, &c. Many of the above will be recognized as of Roxbury and Dorchester. On December 12, the Commissioners of the United Colonies voted to strengthen the garrisons with such of the soldiers as were able and willing to remain for that service during the winter, and to dismiss others to their homes. Jan. 11. " It was ordered by the Council that the Garrison Souldjers at Chelmsford, Billerica, Groaten, Lancaster, Marl- borough, and Sudbury, under Major Willard, be discharged forthwith, and sent home ; " and at the same time it was voted to AT WASHAKOM PONDS. 57 pay them "two months pay on their returne." This may have been done at the request of the people in the above-named towns, because we know that in many cases these garrison soldiers be came very obnoxious to the citizens, as will be seen when we come to the lists at the garrisons, hereafter. I presume this ser vice of withdrawal and settlement of soldiers was under the special charge of Capt. Henchman, who then, I think, retired from active service until the 27th of the next April. In the latter part of May, 1676, the forces under Capt. Hench man were called together again. These had been impressed by order of the Council, April 27, and released to do their planting until such time as wanted. They were mustered at Concord, at this time, an important military post, whence he writes on June 2d, that " Tom Doublet went away soon after Mr. Clark, and with him Jon a . Prescott, Daniel Champney & Josiah White, carrying the pay for Goodman Moss, and 3 gallons of Rum." They marched out towards Brookfield to join the Connecticut forces on the 27th, but on information received from this same Tom Doublet (an Indian), turned aside and had a fight with the Indians at Washakom Ponds ; and this affair detained them so that they did not reach Hadley until the 14th, when they joined the Connecticut forces in the campaign on the Connecticut River. Capt. Henchman marched down towards Boston from Hadley the last of June, and his letter, written on the way, describes the homeward march. Capt. Henchman s Letter of June 30th, 1676. Our scouts brought intelligence that all the Indians were in a con tinual motion, some toward Narhaganset, others towards Watchuset. shifting gradually, and taking up each others quarters, and lay not above a night in a place. They brought in two Squaws, a Boy and a Girl, giving account of five slain. Yesterday, they brought in an old Fellow, Brother to a Sachem, six Squaws and Children, having killed five men, and wounded others, if not killed them, as they supposed by the Blood found in the Way, and a Hat shot through. These and the other inform, that Philip and the Narhagansets were gone several Days before to their own Places. Philip s purpose being to do what Mischief he could to the English. By advice I drew a commanded party under the conduct of Capt. Sill. viz. Sixteen files of English, all my Troop, and the Indians, excepting one File, being all we could make provision for ; for what with the falling short of the Bread promised us, and a great deal of what we had proving mouldy, the Rest of the Forces had but one Bisket a Man, to bring them to this Place. This Party were ordered towards Watchuset. and so to Nashaway and Washnkom Ponds, where we have notice Indians were and so to return to this Place. Where by your Honour s Letter that came to me Yesterday Morning, I understood that Provision was ordered for us ; and which we found to our great Relief last Night, coming hither, Weary and Hungry. The commanded Party we left at Quonsigumon, where they intended to stay a while for the last Scouts we sent out : eleven 58 KING PHILIP S WAR. Prisoners we had in all ; two of the oldest, by Counsel we put to Death, the other Nine the Commissary is ordered to convey to Boston, with Baggage, Horses and some of their Attendants for the Service. DANIEL HENCHMAN. On June 24 there seems to have been a general settlement with all soldiers for service up to this summer campaign. Some were paid in cash by the treasurer, but mostly they were paid in part by the towns where they lived. The following lists probably contain most of the names of those who marched out and served in this campaign, with Capt. Henchman : June 24, 1676. Magnus White. 01 Joseph Lyon. 04 July 24, 1676. John Chub. " 02 Daniel Hawes. 01 Hugh Taylor. 05 Joseph Procter. 00 John Moore. 01 Thomas Wheeler. 00 Richard Scott. Cornett 08 George Stedman. 01 Jonathan Atherton. 04 Jacob Hill. 04 James Cheevers. 02 John Oyne. 02 William Keene. 04 James Franklin. 04 Joseph Richeson. 03 Justinian Holding. 02 Denis Sihy. 02 Thomas North. 04 Thomas Robinson. 05 Robert Ernes. 05 Richard Browne. 03 Francis Woolfe. 01 Joseph Garfield. 01 Jonn Floyd, Lieut. 12 Jonathan Sprague. 04 Benjamin Muzzye. 02 Thomas Adams 04 Francis Cooke. 2 items 04 John Stone. 01 Patrick Morren. 06 09 00 11 08 00 00 06 06 00 00 17 00 14 00 08 04 17 00 16 08 00 00 17 00 11 00 11 00 18 06 18 06 01 08 11 00 18 09 02 10 12 00 01 05 03 04 15 08 10 00 17 02 01 05 11 05 17 00 04 02 10 10 08 06 William Healy. 02 11 06 SimonGroves(als.G-row)03 12 10 John Polly. 01 11 08 John Kendall. 00 17 00 Ephraim Regimant. 03 17 11 Benjamin Rice. 03 17 11 September 23 d 1676. Joshuah Sawyer. 03 07 00 James Sawyer. 03 01 05 Jacob Willar. 12 05 08 John Winter. 01 02 10 John Tolman. 00 07 00 James Cutler. 01 04 03 Nathaniel Adams. 01 02 06 James White. 00 15 08 Joseph Browne. 01 10 00 John Browne. 03 05 08 Samuel Edmons. 02 11 05 John Greenland. 02 02 08 John Pinder. 05 00 00 John Redman. 02 14 00 Abraham Wilkinson. 01 10 10 James Bayly. 02 11 03 Daniel Ruff. 04 17 00 John Gibson. 03 11 00 Richard Wood. 02 17 00 Josiah White. 02 04 03 John Adams. 03 15 06 Joseph Bucknam. 00 14 03 John Stedman. 03 17 02 James Miller. 05 02 06 Jonathan Hill. 02 11 05 James Patterson. 02 11 05 Thomas How. 02 11 05 Richard Scott. 00 08 06 The Indians who served our side were not regularly credited, and so, with few exceptions, their " debentures " are not found. Their names and service will form a separate article. Pocasset Swamp, where Fort Leverett was built, lies in the present town of Tiverton, R.I. II. CAPT. SAMUEL MOSELY AND HIS COMPANY. MANY will be interested to know something in the beginning, of the remarkable character whose name stands at the head of this company. The family name was Maudesley, of Lancashire, England. In the fall of 1635 Henry Maudesley came from England to Massa chusetts in the ship Hopewell, Capt. Babb, master. Henry Maudesley was granted "about a quarter-acre of land " in Dorchester " neere Goodman Munninge s," but lived at Brain- tree, and had children born there Mary, Sept. 29, 1638, and Samuel, June 14, 1641. He had 12 acres of land at Mt. Wollas- ton granted him "for three heads," February 24, 1639-40, was of Artillery Co. 1643, and freeman in 1646. In 1652 he lived in Boston, and had the lot on the corner of the present Union and Hanover Streets. The name Maudesley appears in some of the earliest records as Modsley, Mosley, Mozley, Mosseley ; finally settling down to * Mosely. Samuel s signature, in every case known to me, is Mosley, while Addington, Rawson, and other colonial officials give it Mosely. I have adopted this last form. Samuel Mosely married Ann Addington (born March 10, 1647, daughter of the first Isaac and sister of the Hon. Isaac). They were married previous to May 30, 1665, for on that date Samuel Mosely and his wife Ann sign a deed to John Conney, conveying a piece of land in " Windmill Field," which land Ann inherited from her father, who had died in 1653. Samuel is designated cooper, Conney also was a cooper ; and I judge from an old receipt for a bill of cooperage, signed by Conney and Mosely together, that they were in company in that business in 1673. In 1668 he was one of the commissioners sent by the Court to treat with the sachems of the Narragansets, in company with Richard Wayt and Capt. Wright, and in the record is called " Captain." The author of " The Present State of New England," etc., says : " This Capt. Mosely hath been an old Privateer at Jamaica, an excellent soldier, and an undaunted spirit, one whose memory will be honorable in New England for his many eminent services 60 KING PHILIP S WAR. he hath done the Public/ This may have been the authority upon which Mr. Savage bases his statement that Mosely " visited Jamaica in the way of trade, and the adventurous spirit was excited and schooled, perhaps by Sir Henry Morgan and his associate Buccaneers ; the result of which was his bringing home to Boston two prizes taken from some unmentioned enemy." From these hints and various other circumstances I am satisfied that he was in command of some ship previous to 1668. I notice that Isaac Addington, father of Mosely s wife, was commander of the ship "Ann and Joane " in 1652. I have found, after a long search, the following old account of Treasurer Russell s estate, presented by James Russell, Executor, October 20, 1676. The Country is Debtor to the huire of y e Katch Salsbury, Samuel Mosely Commd r from March 16, 1673 to Aprill 27, 1674 at 24 pr moneth . 33 12s. Pd for wages to the Salsbury s M r & 47 men . 76 01 Pd Capt Mosely for disbursem 8 on the Salsbury . 23 10 Pd Capt Mosely for Water bucketts for y e Katch Swallow 00 19 These two " Katches," with the ship " Anthony," were fitted out and sent forth by the colony to protect our commerce, and in this time were engaged in cruising about Nantucket and vicinity. He must have had notable experience from the facts of the affair of the " two prizes," mentioned above, which from various materials collected from the court files and archives, I am now able to explain. This matter was fully set forth in an excellent article published by the late C. W. Tuttle, Esq. For several years previous to 1675, Boston merchants had been greatly troubled by " Dutch Pirates," as they were called. The mer chants had several times petitioned the Court for a " commission of Order and Reprisal," which that cautious body had steadily refused. Several times the merchants had armed their vessels and taken the matter of " Reprisal" into their own hands, as in the matter of the Dutch ship " Expectation ; " and upon complaint made by the Dutch authorities, these merchants were called to account by the Boston Court. At last, in December, 1674, several small English vessels were captured at the Eastward by the Dutch, joined with some English renegades from the Massa chusetts Colony. The place of the capture was " near Mt. Desart Islles." One of these vessels belonged to John Freake of Boston, the others to Waldron of Dover and Shapley of Kittery. Upon the report of these depredations and the petition of the mer chants, a Commission of Reprisal was granted by the Court, February 15, 1674-5, an expedition was immediately fitted out, and by the request of the merchants Capt. Samuel Mosely was put in command. Sailing out, his ship fell in with a French THE DUTCH PIKATES. 61 vessel which he impressed into his service, and soon met the Dutchmen. They had three vessels, the " Edward & Thomas," principal ship, of which the commander of the pirates, Peter Roderigo, was captain. The second was called, in the appraisal, the " Penobscot Shallopp that Roads went out in," and was com manded by Cornelius Anderson. The third was the vessel captured from Mr. Freake, " The Shallopp called Philipp," and now in charge of Peter Grant and its proper skipper, George Manning, who had been wounded in its capture, and was about to be turned adrift in his boat by the pirates, when in considera tion of his promise of good behavior he was reinstated and allowed to sail his own craft in convoy of the others under Dutch colors ; and now, when Capt. Mosely came to the attack, Manning at once turns his arms upon his captors and assists in their capture ; and in their defence before the Court the pirates complain bitterly of the usage of Capt. Mosely in fighting them under the three colors, English, French and Dutch all at once, and the treachery of Maiming. The pirates were captured, and were brought into Boston April 2, 1675, Mr. Freake s vessel restored to him, and the others confiscated by the Court for expenses, etc. The pirates were imprisoned to await trial in May, 1675. The prisoners were Peter Roderigo, commander ; Cornelius Anderson, consort; John Rhodes, Thomas Mitchell, Randall Judson, Edward Yourings, Richard Fowler, Peter Grant, John Williams, John Thomas (Tomas or Tombs). A few words more will explain who these men were. In October, 1674, Capt. Jurian Aronson (Arnouson), com mander of the Dutch Privateer " Flying-Post-Horse,of Currassow," returning from the destruction of two French forts and settle ments at the Eastward, viz., " Penabskop " (Penobscott) and St. John, came to Boston and asked of the Governor permission to enter the harbor to " repaire," etc. When he sailed away he left a part of his crew, viz. : " Peter Rodrigo, Flanderkin : Corne lius Anderson, Dutchman," three Englishmen who had belonged at Boston, John Rhoades, Randall Judson, Peter Grant ; Richard Fowler, who belonged at Muscongus; and a "Cornishman" named John Williams, who had been taken prisoner by the Dutch and carried to " Currisaw," and came hither with Capt. Arnouson. Rhodes, " principal," Fowler, Grant and Judson, hired Thomas Mitchell of Maiden, and a vessel of which he was part owner, for a " trading voyage to the Eastward ; " and also another, the Shallop. It would seem that the vessels went in at Casco, and the crew captured some sheep at " Mountjoys Island " (now Peak s), belonging to Mr. Mountjoy. (Fowler testified that Mitchell approved this action, but he denied it, though con fessing that he " ate of the mutton." Rodrigo commanded the " Edward and Thomas," and Anderson the " Penobscott Shallopp." Rodrigo had some sort of commis- 62 KING PHILIP S WAR. sion from Arnouson (which one of them testified was " written at the * Beare and had three seals on it "). Anderson had a copy of this without seals. Mitchell testified that he opposed their acts of piracy. Edward Youring testified that he went out with Mitchell and had no part in piracy, and both these were discharged under bonds for appearance. John Toinas was a boatswain who had come to Boston formerly in the ship " William and Jane," and was with Anderson, and was accused of shooting a Frenchman, but denied, though admitting that he "shot at him." Tomas and Williams were taken in Anderson s vessel. Manning s crew con sisted of James De Beck (who was a principal witness against the pirates, and tells a pitiful story of their abuse), a Frenchman and a boy. Roderigo (often written Odrigoe), as will appear hereafter, served a long time under Capt. Scottow at Black Point and at the eastward. Anderson was the famous " Cornelius the Dutch man." Great excitement prevailed in the colony during this trial. The Dutchmen made an able defence, producing their commission under William, Prince of Orange (but which was found to be from their former skipper Arnouson), and alleging the infringe ment of the law of nations by our vessels in trading with the French at the eastward, with whom the Dutch were at war. There is evidence in the trial, as in the subsequent action of the Court, of much popular sympathy for the Dutch prisoners, while the most bitter hostility was expressed against the English renegades. Five were convicted of piracy and condemned to death ; but under the stress of the opening war execution was deferred. Anderson was acquitted. Upon his petition, Rodrigo was soon pardoned and released, and served faithfully against the Indians. Fowler was pardoned in October. The sentence of the others, Rhodes, Grant and Judson, after several months im prisonment, was commuted to banishment out of the country on condition of giving security for prison charges and transportation. / It will be easy to see that Capt. Mosely, the hero of the suc- ** cessful enterprise, would naturally become at once the most notable man in the colony, and when in the midst of his success the Indian war broke out, he would be looked to at once as a popular leader. But he held no military office, and not even his success and popularity, and close family relation to Gov. Lev- erett, could prevail to break the strict rule of official succession in the colonial militia ; so that the only course left him was, per haps, that which suited him best, the organization of an indepen- \/ dent company of Volunteers. " Within three hours," says the old historian, "there were enlisted 110 volunteers." Among these were many of his old "privateers," i.e. those who had served with him in his expedition, and several of the released pirates. CAPT. MOSELY S VOLUNTEERS. 63 From a close comparison of these following lists with the Bos ton tax-lists for 1674, and from other sources, I find that many of his soldiers were apprentices or servants, and probably many boys not yet enrolled in the militia, and therefore not subject to impressment. Several of the names would seem to indicate a sprinkling of Frenchmen, and a contemporary writer relates that the ten or twelve privateers had several dogs with them which rendered valuable service in "finding out the enemy in their swamps." By reason of the loss of the first thirteen pages of the Journal, the names previous to August 21 have to be gathered from the Ledger, and therefore I had to make a close study of many of the names, but have no doubt of any set down below, with the possible exception of Eph" 1 Regeman and Moses Knap, and with these I deem the evidence sufficient to justify me in putting them in under Mosely. It will be noticed that only seventy-five men are credited below for services in this campaign. There is no doubt that more went with him, and we can readily see that many of the transient adventurers, especially if sailors, would be gone before the Court got ready to pay them off regularly. On August 4th Capt. Mosely was paid .50 by the Court " for his souldiers," and November 20th 50 more ; while up to December 10 he had only accounted to the treasurer by receipts from his men for .27, but in the meantime had made no charge for his own military service, and I judge that he may have paid off many who followed him in this brief service at Mount Hope, as their occasion demanded or his convenience suited, without any formal " Debenter " or bill. Thus Cornelius Anderson is not mentioned at all, and doubtless many others were settled with by Capt. Mosely, and no account rendered. There is no indication that he misappropriated the colony s funds, but was probably free-handed with his soldiers and careless in his accounts, and when Capt. Gookin and others complained of his high-handed cruelty towards the Indians, there was no hint of any indirection in regard to his conduct in money matters. I doubt that he had one hundred and ten men, as stated in the " Old Indian Chronicle," but think there may have been many more than are here set down. From some indications I am led to think that many of his men did not return with him to Boston, but joined the Plymouth forces and remained in the service there. Names of those who were credited with military Service under Capt Mosely in June & July 1675 at M* Hope. August 9. 1675 s. d. Robert Webb. 01 07 06 John Bordecot. 01 07 06 William Perry. 01 07 06 s. d. Robert Miles. 01 07 06 Thomas Austin. 01 07 06 Moses Knap. 02 00 00 64 KING PHILIPS WAK. s. d. s. d. 01 07 06 01 07 06 01 07 06 September 3 d . Joshua Winslow, Lieut. Cusbe Ebitt. 03 06 06 01 01 00 Edward Reade. 01 07 06 01 03 00 Thomas Woodmott. 01 07 06 01 07 06 01 07 06 01 07 06 01 02 06 01 07 06 01 02 06 Roger Kenicott. 01 12 00 September 14 th Roger Jones. 01 07 06 Rowland Soley. 01 04 00 William Smallidg. 01 04 00 John Pemberton. 01 01 00 01 01 06 Robert Kenicott. 02 05 00 01 01 06 Josiah Hilman. 04 08 08 John Tombs. 03 06 00 02 07 00 John Steevens. 03 00 00 02 04 06 John Size. 01 12 00 01 07 06 01 19 06 02 02 00 01 07 06 September 21 st Depon Frenchman. George Burbeck William Brookes 01 00 06 01 00 06 02 05 00 01 07 06 William Smith 02 15 06 01 07 06 William Pasmore. 01 07 04 01 07 06 01 07 06 September 28 th . John Cross. 01 04 00 01 07 06 01 16 00 George Cray. Sept 30 th Jacob Bullard. 01 01 06 02 03 09 01 08 00 Oct 19 th 02 04 06 00 18 06 Timothy Horton John Cross. 02 00 00 01 10 00 00 18 00 00 10 06 Rich d Barnam, Corp 1 05 12 00 October 26 th 1675 02 07 00 Richard Eyres Robert Woodward 01 04 00 01 00 00 02 04 06 Derrnan Morris. 02 17 04 01 11 00 Robert Dawes 04 18 06 00 12 00 Isaac Sheffeild. 03 03 04 01 07 06 Daniel Matthewes. 02 00 00 01 07 06 John Baker 02 14 00 01 07 06 Samuel Browne 04 18 06 01 07 06 Samuel Messey 01 07 06 John Wilson. Robert Street. Thomas Tidy. August 14 William Pollard. Joseph Pollard. John Hands. William Harvey. Samuel Gold. Joseph Souther. Alexander Forbs. William Green. Joseph Plaisted. August 20 th Ephraim Regiman. John Coke. Jonathan Nichols. Richard Nevill. Benjamin Phillips. John Brandon. Joseph Sexton. Timothy Horton. James Lendall. Samuel Lane. August 21. Plandian Decro. Jacob Allin, Ensigne. Thomas James, Seryt. Aaron Stephens. John Holman. Samuel Peacock. John Drury. Thomas Gross. August 27 th Robert Foster. William Dean. Manoah Bodman. Francis Burges. William Jones. Thomas Clark. Phillip Sandy. In old Boston Tax-lists, 1674, the names Austin, Hands, Horton, Decro and Woodmott appear as Alliston, Hams, Hort- man, Splandy decro, Woodnet. A petition of John Stevens (Archives, vol. 67) states that he was " shot in the arm " in this service. In the Archives, vol. 68, page 198, there is a petition from Samuel Holman saying that his servant Edward Sampson went out to Mt. Hope under Captain Mosely, and complains that MOSELY MARCHES TO MOUNT HOPE. 65 "instruments of chirurgery of his have been prest for the use of Moseley s chirurgeori, and afterwards a whole box of the same for Doctor Wells when he went to Narragansett, which are now delivered to Dr. Gerrish." Then himself prest to go out under Capt. Wadsworth, had to send his said servant, costing him X14, and then his servant was put under Capt. Turner. I find that several of the names are credited with service under other captains. Thus, John Cross has credit under Henchman, September 14, George Burkback (Burbeck, Berbeck), September 3 and October 19, under Lieut. Brattle. William Brooks under Prentice, August 27. Several are credited as " guards," and may have been in service as scouts and guides, and so credited under the captains with whom each service was ren dered. With these exceptions I think the above, together with some others whose names are now lost, undoubtedly made up the motley company of " Volunteers " with which Capt. Mosely marched out of Boston, probably early in the morning of June 27th, and overtook the troops of Henchman and Prentice, wait ing for them at " Woodcock s," in the afternoon ; and then all marched on and arrived at Swanzy, and quartered at Mr. Miles s Garrison-House close to the bridge leading to Mount Hope. Gen. Cudworth of the Plymouth forces was commander-in-chief. The reports of the events immediately following their arrival are somewhat conflicting. Some account of the general movement of the troops has been given in the former chapter. If any one , reads only the " Old Indian Chronicle " aforesaid, it will seem as " v if Capt. Mosely was the only officer engaged, and that his men did all the fighting ; but the accounts therein were the first un digested rumors that came back from the army, and are not con firmed by Hubbard, or Church, or Mather. The action of the troopers on the afternoon of the 28th belongs to the next chapter, on Capt. Prentice. The repulse they received greatly elated the Indians, who appeared next morning shouting their defiant chal lenge to ours to come across the bridge and fight them. Taking the several accounts, the following is probably near the truth : Capt. Mosely with his volunteers charged across the bridge and pursued the Indians to the woods. The regular troops followed and formed in line to sweep the neck by marching with both wings of the line extended. This, Church says, was so clumsily performed that the two wings encountered and fired upon each other, and Perez Savage, Capt. Henchman s ensign, was wounded. Philip fled before our troops, and with his people escaped across the Mattapoisett River to Pocasset. The volunteers took a prom inent part in the scouting movements of the next few days, then marched, July 5th, with the Massachusetts forces, to the Narra- finsett country, and returned back with them on July 15th to ehoboth, and when on the 18th it was decided to withdraw all the Massachusetts troops except Capt. Henchman s, they 66 KING PHILIP S WAR. returned to Boston and were disbanded, probably about July 20th. No further credits appear under Capt. Mosely until December 10, yet during all the time from his return from Mt. Hope he had been in almost constant service, which it may be well for us to follow, as it is probable that most of his men credited on that date had served with him to the time. On August 7, with 60 dragoons he met Capt. Henchman s tired troops marching towards Mendon, having been sent to them with supplies. (Capt. Thomas s letter in Mather s Brief History says, " We met Capt. Mosely marching from Providence up after us.") When Capt. Henchman went next day to Boston for orders, Mosely was left in command at Mendon, and most of Henchman s men were left with him. Within a few days he was ordered to march to Quaboag (Brookfield), where he continued awhile scouting, etc. In a note endorsing a bill of William Locke, chirurgeon of the Massachusetts forces in the Mount Hope campaign, Mosely says that after Capt. Henchman went to Boston, " he took s d Locke into his company, and from Mendon marched to Malbury and thence to Quaboag." Capt. Lathrop being senior officer, with drew Locke to his forces ; and I find a Court Order (vol. 67, Archives) to Dr. William Hawkins, August 17, 1675, "to join Mosely at Malbrow." On August 16th he wrote a letter to the Governor, which explains his movements, situation, etc. ffrom Nashowah Allies Lankestor 16 th August 1675. Honored Sir Yesterday I spayred Capt. Beeres 26 our men to march with him to Sprinkefeild & it was with Major Willard ordder and I have also Accordinge to my orders from Major General Denison Sentt to Dunstable fort to Inlearge there gard 18 men & to Groatton 12 men & to Chelmsford 12 men out of those y* ware under Capt Hinksmans & of those y 1 Caime with me : Also last nightt about Seaven A clocke we martched into Nashowah wheare we are Att present butt shall as soon as the Constable haith prest us a dozen Horses proseed for Groatton & so to Chensford : according to the order Major Willard gave me yesterday Att Quoah-bawge ; The day before I came from Quoahbaugh I martched I(n) company with Capt Beeres & Capt Laytrop to the Swap where they left mee & tooke theire martch to Sprinkfilld and a soone as they ware gon I tooke my martch Into the woods about 8 mills beyond the Swftpe where Capt Huttcheinson and the rest ware y 4 ware wounded & killed & so returned to follow the enemy as above saide ; also we did find A prsell of wigwoms beyond the Swaimp about 20 which we burnt &c. our Maj r having a Seartayne Intelligence of a considerable party of Indians y l have gathered too- gather a littell above Chensford which I hope wee shalbe up with this night or toMorrough at furthest & if it pleese God I come up with them God assisting me I will cloosely ingadge with them & God spearing my MENDON TO "BLOODY BKOOK." 67 life I shall as opportunity gives leave Acquaint your hofmor of my Actions; I have with me butt 60 men at present; so desiring your prosperity & y l it may please God to preserve your Honour in good health and humbly beseach your prayers to God for my Good Suckses in this my undertaking with My Humbell Searvis &c in all deuttyfull- ness I subscribe myself your Respective kinsman & Humble Searvantt SAMUELL MOSLEY my Cosson Leverett ppresents his Deuty to yo r Honour & my Antt. Between Aug. 9th and 16th he had inarched from Mendon to Brookfield, where he distributed his men as above. On the 17th he probably marched towards Chelmsford as proposed, but on the 22d some of the Nipmuck Indians fell upon Lancaster and killed seven or nine inhabitants, and the next day the people sent for Capt. Mosely and told him of their suspicions of the Hassanemesit Indians (friendly or Praying Indians) then living under super vision in a sort of fort at Marlborough. Capt. Mosely hastily marched to the fort and seized eleven (or according to Major Gookin s account fifteen) of the Indians, " pinioned " them and bound them neck to neck and sent them down to Boston for trial. Of the fifteen only eleven were accused ; all were finally found s innocent & acquitted, and Capt. Mosely s proceeding severely " criticised by the Court and his superior officers. Maj r Gookin believed that the people instigated suspicions " in order to secure the land of the Indians." After sending these prisoners down on August 30th, Capt. Mosely marched up the Merrimac as far as Pennacook (Concord, N.H.) to the home of the peaceful Wannalancet, where he was prepared to repeat the late trans action ; but the Pennacooks had quietly withdrawn and eluded him. He burnt their village and stores of food, and marched back. Capt. Mosely s course was not approved, and the Court immediately sent messengers to win back the friendship of Wannalancet. The next we hear of Capt. Mosely is on September 14, when he marched into Hadley with sixty Bay soldiers, and thence to Deerfield, where he was quartered and scouting on the 18th, when hearing the guns of the attack on Capt. Lathrop at Bloody Brook, he hurried with seventy men to join the fight, and though too late to prevent the terrible disaster, he and his men attacked the great body and " charged them through and through" several times, chasing them seven miles or more. Lieutenants Savage and Pickering especially distinguished themselves for their daring. Finally, after long and severe fighting, but strangely enough, with a loss of only two killed and eight or nine wounded, they were being forced slowly back ward by great numbers, when Major Treat with a force of Connecticut troops and Indians came up and joined them, and before these united forces Philip retreated in haste. 68 KING PHILIP S WAR. In regard to the killed and wounded I have the names. John Gates, and Peter Barren. The will of the latter shows that he was the servant of Elias Hendly of Marblehead, and was pressed to go against the Indians. Will was probated Nov. 26, 1675. A petition of Richard Russ, in the Mass. Archives, declares, " I was just out in the Country s Service under Capt. Mosely, when Capt n Lawtrop was slayne, and in that fight received a shott in y e bottom of my belly, the bullet carryin in with it y e ring of mv Bandoleer." The English retired to Deerfield for the night, and next morning returned to the battlefield and buried their dead. It was thought best to abandon the garrison at Deerfield, and so all removed to Hatfield, and Capt. Mosely was garrisoning that town on October 5th, when he writes the Governor. Major Pynchon, with Capts. Appleton and Sill, were on the opposite side of the river at Hadley. This letter is in another hand, but dictated and signed by Mosely. Hadfield y e 5. of 8 ber 1675 Honoured Sir. Your kind letter I have received bearing date y e 30 th of y c last months for which I render you many thanks and takes it very kindly, I confes, y l I have written some things to that purpose as Concerning the hange- ing of those Indians of Malbery, I desire to be Excuse if my tongue or pen has out run my witt being in a passion and seeing what mischief had beene done by the Indians which I have beene eye witness to, would make a wiser person than I am, willing to have revenge of aney of them, but notwithstanding what I have written there as to that purpose it is fare from my heart to Doe, for I am willing to undertake aney commands Imposed upon me to serve the country as farr as my life, wee discover severall Indians about all these tounes, which causes Allarm, and wee have mett ne er of theire myne body as yett Butt wee Doe Dayly Expect them wee never sended aney skoutes but weould mett them onely last night they could not discover them although they have been about Hadly mill which is the other side of a great River Contrary to my quartes, Springfield Indians is thought of Certain to bee ready att any times when the enemy comes to appose y e toune to fall upon the English along with Enemye, my service pray presented to your Lady and not forgetting yourselfe and all the familye wishing you and all of them much prosperity, health & happiness being all att present from S r your Most Humble & Ready Servant and loving Cousin SAMUEL MOSLEY. [P. S.] Last night we received some news from Springfield which gives us an acct. y Phillip with 500 men Laid in Springfield forte & resolved to fall upon the toune this day, and to prevent his desigue Major Pinchou is gone with Capt Apleton and Capt Sill, with a company of 190 Soulders, two Quiniticate compaueys leaft att Hadly to gard that toune I and my company heare wheare I doe expect them every houre and att nightt as well as in day for they have faired upon y e Sentinell at night. MOSELY S HATFIELD LETTER. 69 The blow fell as threatened, and Major Pynchon and troops came only to find the town in flames, and the Indians fled. Major Pynchon, stricken sorely by this heavy loss of his beloved town, begged earnestly to be relieved from the chief command, and the Court reluctantly and very tenderly granted his request, appointing Capt. Appleton major in his stead. The In dians retired to Coasset, about fifty miles above Hadley, and on the 12th Major A. marched from Springfield and quartered his troops at that place. The next few days we spent in scouting and searching out the enemy, and on the 16th Capt. Mosely writes the following letter to the Governor. The postscript is written in his hand on the margin of the letter. It seems to us too horrible to be conceived of as the act of Christians. The cap tive was the squaw taken at Springfield. Nothing further is known of the affair. Some special act of outrage or treachery on her part may have drawn upon her this fearful sentence. Hatfield, 16 th October 1675 I have skarse aney strang news to acquaint y r Honn r withall at pres ent yesterday wee thought to go in pursuit of y e Enemies at Hadly side of the river and as wee marched out from Hadly Some Theinge better than a mile, the Skoutes y was send from this towne Did Speye some Indians and thereupon we came this side of the river and did march out last night y e whole body or strenght of men that we have heare ; but at Last we took it to Consideration that it was very Dangerous to leave the townes impteye without any Souldiers. This day being a very blusterous and very high winds, I have sent out some skoutes and they discover some Indians, some three miles off. And last night I have send of my men 4 to Deerfield and some two miles from the towne wheare thare was some railes ye enemy have weaged them up and made them very fast. I know not whether it be to trapann the skoutes or else to faight there if we go in pursueth of them ; but I intend to bourn all their rails up, please God to grant me life and health. Wee are told by an Indian that was taken at Springfeeld y they in tended to set upon these 3 townes in one Day. The body of them y* waites this exploite to do is about 600 Indians, as wee are informed by the aforesaid Indian ; and farther wee are informed that they are making a fort some 60 miles from this Place up in the woods, Pray sir be pleased to present my humble service to your lady and all the rest of the family. I make no question but the enemys will make an tempt within a short space of Time upon those Tounes, having nothing else skarse worth your reading I remaine Sir y r most Humble & Ready Servant, whilst [?] SAMUEL MOSLEY. " This aforesaid Indian was ordered to be torn in peeces by Doggs and she was soe dealt with all." 70 KING PHILIP S WAR. On the 19th, the Indians in great force fell upon the town, but were soon " beaten off without doing much harm." Just before the fight seven of Mosely s men and three others were sent out to scout, and seven of the number were cut off and killed. The Indians made no further general attack after this repulse, and withdrew to winter quarters. Capt. Mosely s forces, however, still remained in the western towns with other troops, under Major Appleton, until as late as November 20th ; for, on the 16th, the Court authorized a letter to Appleton directing the withdrawal of the main force, and urging especially the dismissal of the troops of Capt. Mosely. The United Colonies were now in full preparation for the grand movement against the Narragan- sets ; and the " Privateers " with their dashing leaders were needed. The western and outlying towns were garrisoned as securely as might be, and all available " veterans " hurried in to swell the army of the three colonies to 1000 men, for this special service to Narraganset. Much of great interest in the organiza tion of this army must be passed over here. The quota of Massachusetts was to be 527 men, Plymouth 158, and Connecticut 325. Rhode Island was not " counted in," for reasons best known to our dear old Puritan fathers. Josiah Wins- low, Esq., Governor of Plymouth Colony, was made Commander- in-chief of the army, and under him Major Samuel Appleton commanded the Massachusetts forces, consisting of six compa nies, viz. : Maj. Appleton s own, Capt. Mosely s, Capt. Joseph Gardner s, Capt. Nathaniel Davenport s, Capt. James Oliver s, and a troop under Capt. Thomas Prentice. Major Robert Treat commanded the Connecticut forces, five companies under Capts. Siely, Gallop, Mason, Wats ; and Major William Bradford two Plymouth companies, his own and Capt. John Gorham s. The Massachusetts forces mustered on Dedliam Plain, where, on Dec. 9, Gen. Winslow assumed command. There were then " 465 fighting men," besides Capt. Prentice s troop. It seems, from the Journal, that no settlement had been made with Mosely s and Appleton s troops for the campaign in the west, and on December 10th, twenty-seven pages of the book are entirely devoted to their accounts, and few, if any, other items are given under that date save such as relate to them. The captains had paid out small sums at different times, and the towns of " Hadly," " Malbrow," " Mendarn," "Lining" (Lynn), and many constables, merchants and others, are credited by cash, clothing, etc., to these troops ; and on that date Treasurer Hull pays them the balance of their accounts. Among the few precious lists of names preserved in the Massachusetts Archives is the " Muster Roll of Capt. Mosely s company, taken at Dedham the 9 of Xber, 1675." I have arranged this list and the credits of December 10-20 and Jan uary, alphabetically, and tested them carefully otherwise, and find that the greater part of his company were his " veterans." The following account may be of interest. MOSELY S COMPANY AT DEDHAM PLAIN. 71 The town of Dunstable, per Constable Jona. Tyng, brings in a bill of about 100 for billeting Mosely s men, ammunition, etc. Billeting 18 men from 13th August to 10th Sept. 1675 . 16 16 00 " 29 " " llth Sept. " 17th January 1675-6 47 18 00 25 may 1676 . 14 July " . " 6 " " 18 Jau y " 3 " " 3 may 25 Ibs Powder and 250 bullets, &c 2 horses 3 days to Pennacook . 25 03 00 08 08 00 01 15 00 00 01 06 An Auditing Committee questioned the bill, but he was paid on account, October 11, 1676. (Archives, vol. 68.) Credited with Military Service under Capt Mosely. December 10 th 1675 John Rice. 04 16 00 William Blake. 1 04 16 00 Jonathan Freeman. 04 16 00 Samuel Guild. 04 16 00 John Buckman. 04 19 02 Richard Brine. 04 19 02 John Cooper. 04 19 04 Thomas Bull. 04 19 04 John Roberts. 04 19 04 Edward Weston. 05 16 00 Perez Savage, Lieut. 12 00 00 John Ireson. 04 16 00 John Brandon. 02 14 00 John Fuller, Corp 1 . 05 12 00 Benjamin Dyer. 04 19 04 James Johnson, Sergt. 04 11 00 Zachariah Crisp. 04 00 00 Peter Lane 04 19 04 John Turner. 04 16 00 Richard Rust. 04 16 00 John Leech. 04 19 04 Jonathan Nichols. 03 10 02 John Plympton. 04 16 00 Tho 8 Region. 04 12 06 John Cross. 02 02 00 Thomas Green. 04 19 04 Thomas Harris. 05 02 00 James Dickenden. 04 04 00 Richard Scott. 06 10 00 William Bateman. 01 07 06 Richard Adams. 04 16 00 Thomas Warren. John Ramsey. John Stebins. Jonathan Wales. Timothy Wales. Jeremiah Stokes. Joseph Twichell. Samuel \ r eale. Andrew Johnson. Mathew Thomas. Francis Siddall. John Dunbar. Edward Weeden. Samuel Kemble. Timothy Hortman. John Corser. Daniel Magenis, Corpl. James Updike, Serg t . Daniel Matthews. Mathias Smith. John Williston. John Sherman. William Phillips. James Frankling. Bartholomew Flegge. Benjamin Allen. John Cantelberry. Hugh Collohue* " Jacob Willar Valentine Harris. James Mathews. 06 11 02 04 19 04 02 10 06 04 19 04 04 19 04 02 14 00 04 19 04 04 19 04 04 19 04 05 02 00 04 19 04 04 16 00 04 19 04 04 19 00 02 16 04 04 19 02 05 10 00 04 09 04 07 09 00 04 16 00 04 16 00 04 13 60 04 19 02 05 04 06 04 19 04 02 08 00 04 16 00 04 19 04 13 11 00 02 14 00 01 18 06 1 Variations not noted above are, Blacke ( W m Blake, jr. for whose release his father, W m Sen , petitions the Court) , Brien, Wesson, Ayrson (for Ireson) , Dayer, Leane, Russ, Leigh, Plimton, Dichetto, Stebence, Weals, Stokes, Cousier, McKennyes, Willingston, Canter- berry, and other minor changes. 1 August, 1676. George Nowell petitions for the release of his servant " Hugh Gallo way that went as a Volunteer under Mosely neere the beginning of ye warre, and is now in y garrison at Hatfield under Capt. Swe ane." 72 KING PHILIP S WAR. Daniel Johnson Trumpeter 09 12 00 Dennis Sihy. Dec. 20th Thomas Bull. John Mayo. 04 17 00 Richard Randall. Thomas Okleby 04 10 00 Richard Brian. John Casey 01 15 06 John Day. John Langbury 01 10 00 Edward Weston. Richard Jinkes 07 04 00 Richard Gibson. Joshua Silver-wood 04 12 06 Thomas Welch. John Morse Commissary 02 15 06 John Ramsey. 1675-6 Jan y 25. Thomas Furbush. Benjamin Norden 04 16 00 John Rosse. Jonathan Gay. 02 03 08 William Philips. George Manning. 01 00 06 John Rice. Joseph Porter. 01 00 06 James Chadwick. Josias Hillman. 01 00 06 Edward Weeden. Thomas Jones. 01 14 02 June 24 th Edward Read. 00 10 04 Thomas Forbes. Robert Parris. 01 10 00 John Pemerton. John Langbury. 01 10 00 John Leech. February 29, 1675-6 William Maderill. Daniel Canada. 02 14 00 Peter Leane. James Franklin. 02 14 00 William Smallage. Jonathan Wales. 02 14 00 Richard Gibson. George Grimes. 02 14 00 Thomas Ockerby. John Provender. 02 14 00 Jonathan Wales. John Leech. 02 14 00 Richard Randall. Hugh Gollihu (Collohue) 02 14 00 Joseph Wakefield. William Bateman. 04 01 00 William Blake jr. Joshuah Silverwood. 03 00 00 John Essery. John Bucknum. 02 14 00 Thomas Warren Edward Weston. 03 03 00 Philip Keane. Benjamin Dyer. 02 14 00 Edward Weason. March 24 th 1675-6 Joseph Douse. Daniel Mathews. 01 16 00 Stephen Fielder. Samuel Colebourne. 02 14 00 Joseph Pratt. John Stebbins. 03 00 00 Thomas Bishop. John Brandon. 03 00 00 Joseph Deers. Jonathan Freeman. 02 14 00 Richard Addams. John Williston. 02 14 00 James Couch. Daniel Matthews. 02 05 00 John Ramsey. James Johnson. 05 10 00 Thomas Webb. Richard Gibson. 03 17 00 Daniel Clow. John Farmer. 08 12 03 John Wilkins. John Canterbery. 03 03 00 Matthew Thomas. John Cooper. 02 14 00 Samuel Leman. James Updike. 02 14 00 Richard Cowell. April 24 th 1676 Daniel East. John Munge. 02 14 00 Thomas Hitchborn. John Shepard. 03 12 00 Samuel Fosdike. Thomas Davis. 02 14 00 John Hawkins. Sam 1 Guile. 04 01 00 David Landon James Mollard. 01 17 06 Seabread Taylor. 1676 07 03 06 02 02 01 02 04 02 00 02 02 0,2 04 02 02 03 02 02 02 08 02 02 02 02 02 02 04 02 02 03 02 02 02 00 02 05 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 09 03 00 15 04 14 00 14 00 11 00 14 00 08 02 14 00 18 00 14 00 14 00 14 00 04 00 14 00 12 00 03 00 14 00 14 10 14 10 15 06 14 10 14 10 14 10 02 00 14 10 14 00 10 10 14 10 02 00 02 00 14 10 14 10 14 00 18 06 02 00 08 00 14 10 14 10 02 00 08 00 14 10 14 10 14 10 02 00 14 10 14 10 14 00 14 00 14 10 02 00 MOSELY AT NARRAGANSET. 73 John Long. 02 14 10 Peter Bennett, Lieut. 06 15 00 John Wensteed. 02 14 00 Edmund Chamberlain. 00 12 00 Jacob Cole. 03 00 00 Edward Walker. 02 14 00 Joseph Low. 04 10 10 Joseph Graves. Roger Brown. Thomas Bull. Joseph Douse. James Smith. Dennis Sihy. 01 04 00 02 14 00 03 03 00 02 14 00 05 08 00 04 00 00 It will be remembered that the credits for service were given at the close of such service, or at regular monthly or bi-monthly settlements. It often happened that the men would be separated from their officers, at garrisons on special duties, and so waiting the official signature the bill would be delayed sometimes for a year. Many who were in the Narraganset campaign were not paid off till the general settlement, June 24th, 1676. And though many of the credits represent later service, yet I judge the oft- repeated amount, X02 14 00, represents the "Fort" campaign. This will hold in nearly every case, though not all. Thomas May was in that campaign and received no credit until Septem ber 23, 1676. The credits in other companies confirm this theory. The forces under Gen. Winslow marched on the afternoon of December 9th to Woodcock s Garrison, and December 10th to Seaconk. From thence Capt. Mosely and his men sailed with Mr. Richard Smith across the bay, and then marched to his Garrison-House at Wickford in Narraganset, arriving in the even ing, having taken a party of thirty-six Indians on the way. Mr. Church relates that he went across to Wickford with Mr. Smith, but omits any mention of Capt. Mosely and his company, and their capture of 36 Indians in the march to Wickford, but tells of 18 that himself took with the " Eldridges and some other brisk hands." Church never omits to tell of his own exploits at full length. Mosely was the most popular officer of the army, and un doubtedly excited Church s anger and perhaps jealousy by ignoring and opposing him. Mosely, the successful captain at the head of a strong company of veterans, would not readily accept commands from one without title or company, whose best service hitherto had been only in scouting and skirmishing with small irregular parties. Church writes his own adventures. Mosely s can never be known fully, but what we have shows him to be brave, popu lar with both the army and at home, and wonderfully successful. Gen. Winslow with the other forces ferried over to Providence, and marched through " Pomham s " territory, in hopes to capture that sachem, to the rendezvous at Smith s Garrison, on the even ing of Dec. 12th. Mosely had captured one Peter, an Indian who betrayed Philip, and became invaluable to the army as a faithful guide, actuated probably by desire of revenge. On December 14th the General marched out with his forces to explore the 74 KING PHILIP S WAR. surrounding country, and Sergt. (John) Bennet, with thirty men of Capt. Oliver s company, went out scouting, and killed two Indians and captured eight more. On the 15th occurred a skirmish at a certain stone-wall, where twenty or thirty Indians discharged their guns at Capt. Mosely at once without effect. On the same evening the Garrison-House of Jireh (Jerry) Bull at Petasquamscot was destroyed, and seven teen persons killed, of which news was brought next day by Capt. Prentice s troop, and on the 17th the Connecticut forces, three hundred English and one hundred and fifty Mohegans, arrived at the same place, and on the 18th the whole force of Massachusetts and Plymouth met them there about 5 P.M. Bull s Garrison had been intended for the general rendezvous, and its loss was severely felt, as the army was forced to spend the entire night without shelter. At 5 A.M. the next morning, December 19th, they took up the march towards the Fort. The story of the march, and the great battle at the " Swamp fort," is to be told in full in a subsequent chapter and so is omitted here. The following list of " Wounded and Slayne " in Capt. Mosely s company, is in the Archives, vol. 68 : I John Farmer, Boston Richard Barnam, " Jerre Stockes, " W m Bourle, Charlestown (probably Burt) Edmund Chamberlain, Maulden Richard Updick, Narragansett 9 Wounded / Lieut. Perez Savage Boston men are on 6 Jan ry, at Rhode Island with 5 Souldg to attend the wounded men there John Brandon John Sherman, Watertown. James Updick, Boston. James Chadwick, Maiden. John Fuller, Dedham. John Shepheard, Charlestown. Rich d Addams of Sudbury. Jacob Coole, Charlestown. Samuel Fosdick. Thomas Weales. James Dighenton. (Dichetto) J> To attend Joseph Low. Joshua Silverwood. Daniel Weld, chirurgeon, is credited 10 ; is probably the Dr. Wells referred to in petition of Holman above. He was " Chir urgeon General," and was of Salem. There is a credit to George Thomas, Dec. 10, for " Chyrurgion Instruments for Dr. Weld and Dr. Knott" (Richard Knott of Marblehead). These were with the wounded probably, and also Dr. Philip Read, of Lynn, and Dr. William Hawkins, Boston. MOSELY AT NARRAGANSET. 75 Mr. Hubbard states the number of Mosely s men killed to be nine, wounded ten. Whole number of English killed, above eighty, and one hundred and fifty wounded that recovered. He puts the number of Indians killed at one thousand warriors, and many of the aged and women and children. The troops returned to Smith s Garrison that night, and cared for their wounded ; and Church relates that Mr. Andrew Belcher arrived that evening at Wickford with a vessel laden with supplies, without which there must have been great suffering. In a bill presented by Capt. Benjamin Gillain, dated Jan. 19, 1675, is the item, " To charges on men to cut out Andrew Belcher s Sloop to goe to Narragansett, 14s." The troops remained mostly inactive during the ensuing month, seeking to bring the Indians to terms of a permanent peace. There was some scouting and frequent captures, but no general action. Jan. 10, new forces were sent down from Boston, and the army was recruited to 1600 men, and on Jan. 27th began to move in pursuit of the Indians, who had now -renewed their depredations. At last, in the early part of February, having pursued them around as far as Marl borough and Brookfield, they were forced to leave the pursuit for want of provisions and rest, and marched into Boston. On the 5th of February the Major was ordered to dismiss his soldiers to their several homes to await further summons. On February 15th, Capt. Mosely was ordered to march with his company to Sudbury, and there to abide till further orders. These credits cover various services from Dec. 10, 1675. July 24th 1676 Henry Swaine. 02 13 00 Richard Bennett. 08 08 00 Samuel Clark. James Couch. John Hands. 03 03 04 00 19 03 00 15 00 Gilbert Endecott. 05 08 09 John Dunbarr. 02 12 02 John Day. Sam 1 Colborne. 02 14 09 02 14 10 Benjamin Lathrop. John Salter. 02 08 00 01 14 02 Samuel Guild. 04 02 00 Ezekiel Hamblin. 00 12 10 Gilbert Forsith. Perez Savage, Lieut. Samuel Measie. John Oates. 04 02 00 07 16 00 02 13 00 03 12 00 Roger Prosser. Andrew Johnson. Jonathan Sprague. John Pitcher. 00 19 03 02 14 10 00 18 10 00 12 10 William Wainright. Jeffrey Jeffers. Richard Silvester. Armstrong Homer. John Mousall. 02 14 10 02 09 06 00 18 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 John Harrison. John Auger. David Langdon. John Sibly. Francis Earle. 00 12 10 00 12 10 00 12 11 00 12 00 00 10 02 August 24. Roger Prosser. Peter Mellardy. John Gilbert. 1676 02 02 00 00 10 02 00 12 10 Nathaniel Badcock. John Goff. Joseph Wakefield. Perez Savage. 00 10 02 00 15 00 00 12 10 01 12 02 Joseph Saxton. Jacob Allin. 00 12 10 01 05 08 John Minds. Israel Howeu (Howell) 00 18 10 00 10 02 76 KING PHILIP S WAR. Joseph Butler. 00 10 02 Mark Round. 02 14 10 September 23 d , 1676. John Prescott. .00 10 02 John Mudg. 02 14 10 James Marshall. 00 12 10 Samuel Davis. 00 15 00 William Bassly. 01 16 10 Thomas May. 02 14 00 Archibell Forrest. 02 14 10 John Gilbert, Senior. 00 12 10 James Wamsly 02 14 00 From Sudbury he soon after marched to Marlboro , where he /seems to have remained several weeks, taking a large part in the negotiations concerning the redemption of captives, regulating (?) the affairs of the friendly Indians, etc. It is evident that he was always impatient of commands from his superior officers. The " seniority " rule of precedence was strictly adhered to in the colonial army, and in active service we find him constantly either disregarding or avoiding it. It is evident, even from Church s own account, that at the Fort fight, Gen. Winslow was only nominally in command ; for when by Church s advice he had resolved to hold the fort and remain, " a certain Captain" threatened to shoot his horse under him if he attempted to enter with his troops, and " in a great heat " declared that Church had " lied " to him about the situation, and then a certain Doctor " brusled up " and supported the said captain. There is little doubt that this captain was Mosely. The exploits of Mr. Church in this campaign seem not to have been known to any of the early historians except himself. It is plain that the Massa chusetts officers, especially Mosely, at the head of his veterans, popular, and flushed with the fresh victory in which Church had no part, would regard his interference as that of an insolent up start. This popularity with the army, and the violent party of ^/Indian-haters, together with his eminent success in the field, and probably his near relationship to the Governor s family, supported him in many notorious acts of insubordination and insolence \J towards his superiors, and even the Council. The hanging of Indians, referred to in his letter, was probably his " tying up " of the two Indian captives and extorting their evidence against the J eleven seized at Marlboro . The affair of Job Kattenanit, a tried and faithful " praying " Indian, whom, for his faithful service, Gen. Denison, by the advice of Major Savage, had given liberty to seek J out his family held as captives by Philip s allies, shows Mosely s influence; for he came to the General s head-quarters and de nounced both officers, and raised such a storm of indignation that i/ they were obliged to send forthwith to bring Job back. And although members of the Council were very indignant at his in solent conduct, he was not even reprimanded, either for this act, v or his high-handed proceeding at Concord ; where he entered the congregation on the Sabbath, and harangued the people against the peaceful Nashobah Indians, whom the Council had placed in the charge of Mr. Hoare; and then seized the Indians, allowing LAST SERVICES OF CAPT. MOSELY. 77 his soldiers to plunder all their possessions in spite of Mr. Hoare s remonstrances, and marched them down to Boston, whence the Court was constrained to send them to Deer Island, where with many other friendly Indians they were subjected to fearful priva tions. A full account of all these transactions may be found in the History of the Praying Indians by that upright and noble man, Gen. Daniel Gookin ; a summary of which will be given in a subsequent chapter. Capt. Mosely marched with Major Savage from Marlborough to Quaboag, March 1, 1676. They were there joined by the Con necticut troops, and all moved on towards Northampton, and he was engaged in the succeeding campaign in the west. On May 5th he received an independent commission, and the wages of his soldiers were to be raised by popular subscription, and besides they were to have all the profits accruing from the plunder or sale of captives, and if these resources failed, the Court was to make up the balance ; arid this irregular way of settling may be the reason that no larger credits appear in the later months. In June, Mosely and his men were sent in company with Capt. Brattle and his troop to assist the people of Plymouth Colony, and were still there after July 22d ; and they there took part in the capture of one hundred and fifty captives, and prob ably soon after returned to Boston. The faithful services of the friendly Indians in the later campaigns had caused a reaction of popular feeling towards them. The fame of Church, who suc ceeded in destroying Philip at Mount Hope, August 12th, some what eclipsed that of Capt. Mosely, and we hear no more of his military service thereafter, if he performed any. On August 24th, at a great sale of Indian captives, he is charged with " 1 boy and girle 6 ; & 13 squawes & papooses 20c " ; and this is the last notice I find of him throwing light upon his subsequent career. The date and circumstances of Capt. Mosely s death are not, as yet, definitely known. Savage says he died January, 1680. The " Inventory of the Estate of Cap tn Sam 1 Mosely deceased," was taken Jan. 26, 1679 (N. S. 1680), and may have been Mr. Savage s authority. In Judge Sewall s Interleaved Almanac Diary, this item appears : " 1677, Oct. 20, 7, Capt. S. Mosely." But we are left in doubt as to its meaning. His final account is found in Hull s 3d Ledger, under date of July, 1678, and credits him with military service, 67 05 06, which I presume was in full for his whole service. Sometime after, September 1678, XI credit is given "per Isaac Addington," to balance Mosely s account with the government. He died intestate. The careful inventory, rendered by Sewall, of the worldly possessions as produced by Ann Mosely the widow, who was admitted ad ministratrix January 30, 1679-80, makes no mention of any arms or clothing except an old musket and sword in the " Garret." 78 KING PHILIP S WAR. This circumstance, with some others, and a lack of any official reference to his death, would seem to indicate that it happened away from home. Ann Mosely, thrown upon her own resources for maintenance, was granted a license by the town authorities, in 1681 and 1682, "To sell wine and stronge liquors out of dores." That she prospered is proved by the deed of trust to her brothers, Isaac Addington and Penn Townsend, 1684, in favor of her daughters, "her only living children," just before she married Nehemiah Pierce, " set-work-cooper." He died in 1691, leaving her again a widow. The son Samuel died young, doubtless. The daughter Rebecca married January 22, 1694, James Townsend; and Mary mar ried William Webster, November 25, 1696. Rebecca married again in 1708, Jonathan Williams, who in 1733 appears as the Narraganset claimant in the "right of his wife s Father Capt Maudesley." Capt. Mosely s descendants were quite numerous in the second and third generation, through Rebecca s children by Townsend and Williams. Her daughter, Rebecca Williams, married Thaddeus Mason, and their daughter, Rebecca Mason, married, in 1767, William Harris, and their oldest son was Rev. Thaddeus Mason Harris, D.D., b. July 7, 1768; grad. H. C., 1787, who was for forty-three years the Pastor of the First Church in Dorchester, and died April 3, 1842. ni. CAPT. THOMAS PRENTICE AND HIS TROOP, WITH TROOPS OF LIEUT. OAKES AND CAPT. PAIGE. IT may be in order here to recall attention to the very efficient organization of the colonial militia, noted in Chapter I. We have seen that Capt. Henchman s foot company was made up of quotas of men from all the surrounding towns ; Capt. Mosely s was of hastily collected volunteers, and we now come to the third branch of the service, the " Troopers," in some respects the most important. It seems to have been a matter of solicitude in the colony for many years to increase the number of horses, and as early as 1648 laws were passed encouraging the formation of cavalry companies. Those who would enlist as troopers in local companies and keep horses, were allowed five shillings per year, and their head and horse-tax abated. It naturally followed that the most thrifty and well-to-do in the colony would become troopers, and the men of greatest ability and influence would be made their officers. At the beginning of the war there were five regular cavalry companies or " troops " in the colony. The Suffolk County Troop was commanded by Capt. William Davis, who died October, 1676, and was succeeded by Lieut. Thomas Brattle. The Middlesex Troop was commanded by Capt. Thomas Prentice. Essex County had two troops, one raised in Salem and Lynn, of which George Corwin was captain; and another, raised in Ipswich, Newbury and Rowley, of which John Appleton was captain. In Hampshire and Norfolk the horsemen were attached to the various companies in the regiment, eight or ten to each company of foot. Besides these regulars, there was an independent company raised at large in the counties of Suffolk, Middlesex and Essex, called the " Three County Troop." Edward Hutchinson had command of this up to October, 1674, but then resigned, and the court had not found a suitable successor who was willing to accept the appointment, and Lieut. William Haisy was in command in June, 1675. Out of these "troops" quotas were drawn to make up the company required for special service, and officers were chosen at the option of the court. In this first campaign the troopers were mostly from the towns immediately around Boston; and, in addition to these, were a few Indians 80 KING PHILIP S WAR. from Natick and Punckapoag. The Captain and Lieutenant were from Cambridge, and the Cornet from Woburn. The commander, Capt. Thomas Prentice, was born in England about 1620. He came with wife Grace, and daughter Grace to Cambridge, and settled on the south side of the river ; freeman 1652. He was a very active and influential man, and a trusted officer both in civil and military service. He died July 7, 1709, aged 89 years. Capt. Prentice was appointed captain of the special Troop, June 24, 1675, and sent out with Capt. Henchman, as has been related. On arriving at Swansey, at Miles s garrison, the Indians began firing from the bushes across the river at our guards, and twelve of the troopers volunteered to go over the bridge and drive them off. These were commanded by Quartermaster Joseph Belcher and Corporal John Gill. Mr. Church went along with them, and also a stranger, and William Hammond acted as pilot. As they advanced across the bridge the Indians fired upon them and wounded Mr. Belcher in the knee, killed his horse, and shot Gill in the breast, but his buff coat and several thicknesses of paper saved him from injury. They killed the pilot outright, and the troopers were forced to retreat, bringing off Hammond and his horse. On the renewal of the attack by the Indians next morning, the troop, supported by Mosely s volunteers, charged across the bridge and drove the Indians from the "Neck" and across to Pocasset. June 30th was spent by the army traversing Mount Hope neck, and at evening Capt. Prentice with his troop rode to Rehoboth and quartered over night. On the morning of July 1st he divided the troop, sending one division back under command of Lieut. Edward Oakes. It is not certain whether both divisions rode back by the same route, but it would seem thus from the result. The captain s division came upon the Indians burning a house, but could not get at them on account of several fences which had to be torn down, giving the Indians time to retreat to a swamp. Lieut. Oakes s force, however, dis covered them from a more advantageous quarter, and chasing them over a plain killed two of Philip s chief men, but in the fight lost one of their own men, John Druse of Roxbury, mortally wounded. The next few days Capt. Prentice and his troop spent in searching the swamps, and then went with the army to Narra- ganset, as has been related heretofore. Capt. Prentice s name stands second of the signers to the treaty with the Indians, July 15, 1675. After the return to Swansey and the news that Philip was shut up in Pocasset Swamp, when the main body of Massachusetts troops were sent away to Boston, Capt. Prentice and his troop were ordered to scout towards Mendon, where the Indians had lately made an assault upon the people, killing several. The troopers met Capt. Johnson s company at Mendon, as will appear from the following minutes of the Council : CAPT. PRENTICE IN THE MT. HOPE CAMPAIGN. 81 (Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 22G.) July 26 th 1675 Council Mett. The Council on perusing of y e letter of Capt Prentice & capt Johnson, Dated July 23 d 1675, judged it meet to order that Capt Prentice & his Troopers be presently called home & y l Capt. Johnson with his Souldiers be also sent to Returne leaving ... of his foot Souldiers the Scouts(?) to remayne as a Guard to Mendon and . of his foote at "Wrentham as their Guard Referring it to the sayd Captaine to consult with the Sarjant or other chiefe Officers of each Towne how many to leave at each Towne with their Armes ? Remayne till further order. The letter referred to is now lost from the files. The following are the soldiers who served in the first, or Mt. Hope campaign, under Capt. Prentice : August 27 th 1675 John Needham. Jonathan Fairbank. Samuel Pollard. Fathergon Diiiely. William Brooks. William Agur. Jabes Jackson. Francis Wayman. Samuel Gulliver. Thomas Woolson. John Livermore. John Gibson. William Read. Benjamin Moore. William Brown. Joseph Parmiter. Joseph Curtice. Daniel Dean. Thomas Goble. Ebenezer Prout. James Miller. Robert Evans. 1 John Baxter. Solomon Phips, Corp r Benjamin Scott. Christopher Grant. Nathaniel Howard. Stephen Pain. Henry Summers. Jonathan Bunker. James Lowden. John Fowle. John Gill, Corp 1 . Joseph Belcher, Qar tr M 1 02 1 In the Cash Account the name is Eames. 5 02 00 00 Nehemiah Hayden. 01 07 00 James Whitehead. 02 00 00 01 18 06 01 18 06 02 03 00 John Wayman, Cornet 04 17 00 September 3 d 1675 John Bisco. 02 08 06 02 03 00 02 08 06 Oliver Willington. 02 08 06 John Mason. 02 03 00 02 08 06 William Bond. 02 00 00 02 01 06 02 03 00 02 08 06 Thomas Boylston. 02 17 06 September 16 th James Indian. 02 04 08 02 08 06 Thomas Indian. 02 04 08 01 01 06 02 03 00 02 03 00 02 03 00 September 21 st Matthew Bridge, QfJfrOS 13 00 Anthony Cooke. 01 00 00 John Druse. 00 11 06 02 04 03 02 03 00 Edward Oakes, Lieut. 05 00 00 Thomas Oliver. 01 01 06 02 08 06 John Clark. 02 03 00 02 08 06 Thomas Hunter. 01 11 04 02 08 06 Felix Indian. 01 00 06 02 08 06 02 08 06 02 08 06 Benjamin Ahaton. 00 10 00 Harry Indian. 01 00 06 John Adams. 01 00 00 02 18 04 Jeremie Indian. 01 00 06 02 02 06 01 00 00 01 13 00 Zachary Phillips. 02 10 00 Joseph Allin. 04 00 00 Jonathan Orris. 01 18 06 02 08 06 David Thomas. 01 10 00 02 18 04 Caleb Carter. 01 12 00 02 03 00 Abraham Skinner. 01 08 06 02 08 06 November 30 th 1675 01 13 00 Nathaniel Richards. 02 03 00 02 11 00 02 01 00 Samuel Payson. 02 03 00 82 KING PHILIP S WAK. Dec. 3d, 1675, Capt. Prentice was appointed to command a troop of horse in the Narraganset campaign, joined the army at Ded- ham plain, and marched with it, as related heretofore, to Wick- ford, whence on the 16th he rode with his troop to Petasquamscot, and brought back the news of the destruction of Bull s garrison. On the 19th took part in the battle at the fort. In the Massachusetts Archives, vol. 68, page 104, I find that John Wyman, of his troop, was killed, and Nathan Richardson and Nathan Belins (Billings) of Woburn, and Samuel Stone of Cambridge, were wounded. After this battle Capt. Prentice was active in the subsequent scouting raids into the adjoining country. On December 27 he rode into Pomham s country (now Warwick, R.I.) and destroyed many wigwams of an Indian village, but found no Indians. On January 21 he was again scouting, and met with a party of Indians, of whom two were captured and nine killed. On the 27th the army started in pursuit of the enemy, and after several days marching returned to Boston, and the Massachusetts men were dismissed, for the time, to their homes. The following is the list of credits for this campaign. Appended is a list of the same, as returned from the various local companies for this service, copied from Mass. Archives, vol. 68, showing the localities from which they came. February 29, 1675-6 Joseph Peniman. 04 Joseph Weeden. 04 Samuel Weeden. 04 Henry Kenney. 01 John Spaford. 04 Joseph Moore. 04 Thomas Brown. 04 James Burnam. 04 Nathaniel Ballard. 04 Thomas Putman. 04 Edmond Potter. 04 Daniel Champnes. 06 William Delaway. 04 John Adams. 04 Joseph Plummer. 04 Charles Blinko. 04 William Miriam. 04 John Edmonds. 04 Thomas Johnson. 04 John Welcott. 04 March 24 th 1675-6 Richard Mather. 04 Nathaniel Billinge. 04 John Andrews. 04 Joseph Marshall. 04 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 12 00 10 00 10 00 00 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 William Kent. 04 10 00 John Windham. 04 10 00 Jacob Nash. 04 10 00 John Eames. 04 10 00 James Lowden. 04 10 00 Samuel Pay son. 04 10 00 William Shattock. 04 10 00 John Bush. 04 10 00 Thomas Goble. 05 08 00 John Pason. 04 10 00 Joseph Wright. 04 10 00 June 24 th 1676. John Willington. 02 08 06 John Guppy. 01 10 00 Samuel Chapman. 04 10 00 Joseph Grout. 04 10 00 Daniel Thurston. 04 10 00 William Dodg. 04 16 00 JohnAcy. 04 02 00 Joseph Parmiter. 04 10 00 Henry Ellitt. 04 10 00 John Wyman, Lieut. 11 05 00 Thomas Prentice, Capt. 18 00 00 William Mingo. 04 10 00 John Stern. 04 10 00 Joseph Hutchinson. 05 08 00 CAPT. PRENTICE IN THE NARRAGANSET CAMPAIGN. 83 John Richards. 04 10 00 Thomas Geery. 04 10 00 Francis Wayman. 04 10 00 John Barrett. 04 10 00 Nath. Richardson. 04 10 00 Hugh Taylor. 04 10 00 Caleb Grant. 04 10 00 Thomas Peirce. 04 10 00 Thomas Hodgman 04 10 00 Benjamin Davis. 04 10 00 JohnAcy. 05 08 00 Stephen Cooke. 02 05 08 Isaac Brookes. 06 15 00 Increas Wing. 04 10 00 Henry Summers. 02 18 03 John Kendall. 04 10 00 Samuel Stone. 04 10 00 Samuel Whiting. 04 10 00 Nathaniel Cann. 04 10 00 John Wyman. 00 15 08 List ofCapt. Prentice s Troopers. (Mass. Arch., vol. 68, p. 73.) On the back of this list is written, " Capt. Prentise s 73 Troopers." Troopers belonging to Capt. Appleton s Troope. James Burnum, John Andrews, Edmond Potter, Samuel Chapman, John Asee (Acy), 1 John Spaford, Daniel Thurston, Joseph Plumer, John Woollcock, Thomas Johnson. 10. Troopers belonging to Capt. Curwin. Steeven Hascull (Hasket), Charles Blincko (for Jon* Corwins) v Thomas Howard (for Benj. Browne), William Dodge (Jr,) Thomas Putman Juniour, John Richards, Nathaniel Ballard junr, John Ed monds, William Merriam, Thomas Flint (Sen r ). Troopers belonging to Capt. Hutchinson. Mr. Eliakim Hutchason, Benjamin Muzzey, Sam 1 Weeden, Joseph Weeden, John Guppie (Goopy), Daniel Greenland, John Barret, Thomas Hodgman, Benj a Daveis, John Gooll (Gould), Joseph Mar shall, Thomas Geery (Grary), Thomas Hart, Isack Brooks, Joseph Right (Wright), John Kiudall, Nath 1 Richardson, Thomas Pearce, Increas Wing, Nath 1 Cann. Troopers belonging to Captin Davis. William Kent, John Ruggles, Sampson Chester, William Towers, [John Miner erased], Henry Eliot, John Person (Pason), Richard Mather Juniour, Martin Sanders, Crosby of Braintree (Joseph), Joseph Penniman, Samuel Haidne (Haiden), Ebenezer Haidne (Haiden), John Riplee, Samuel Whitney. 14. Troopers belonging to Middlesex. Mr. John Long, Mr. Joseph Line, James Lowdne (Lowden), Thomas Browne, John Adams, Samuel Stone Juniour, Daniel Champ- ney, John Earns, William Shattock, John Stearns, Caleb Grant, Joseph Groute, Joseph Moore, Joseph Parmiter, David Stone, Nathaniel Billing, Thomas Goble Juniour, Ebenezer Proute, John Wyman Juniour, Francis Wyman Juniour. 19. " 73 besides Peter Woodward & Joseph Proute." 1 The names in brackets are added from another list on page 100 of the same volume. 84 KING PHILIP S WAR. In an anonymous contemporary account published in England July, 1676, it is related that Capt. Prentice with six troopers went to the rescue of a portion of Capt. Wadsworth s ill-fated company at Sudbury, and these three names may be of those troopers. Aug 24 1676 Samuel Church. 00 11 05 John Cuttiu. 00 18 06 Samuel -Goff. 01 00 00 Capt. Prentice had charge of the impressment and equipment of Middlesex men in the winter and spring of 1675-6, as shown by various orders of the court to furnish troopers, guards and scouts. He had much to do later in settling the affairs of the friendly Indians, by whom he was greatly respected. After the death of Philip, the Nipnet sachem John, accepting the court s amnesty, came in with some of his men, and were kept in Capt. Prentice s charge at his house. A credit of <6 " for fetching y e Natick Indians " refers to his conducting their removal in 1676, to Deer Island. July, 1689, Capt. Prentice, with Mr. Noah Wiswall, was sent to arrange matters with the uneasy Puncka- poags and Naticks. When Sir Edmund Andros, on July 2, escaped from prison in Boston and fled to Rhode Island, Capt. Prentice was ordered to ride down with his troop and receive him after he was arrested by the people at Rhode Island. This order he obeys, and writes the Court from Bristol, July 8th, an account of his reception of the prisoner, and his purpose to return by way of Dorchester to the Castle, to avoid disturbance. (Mass. Archives, vol. 107, page 256.) In the Archives, vol. 106, page 436, is a certificate from Capt. Prentice that he was billeted with his troop on the journey to and return from Rhode Island, two nights at Woodcock s tavern. On the death of Major Gookin, the various tribes of " Praying " Indians petitioned the court in 1691 to appoint Capt. Prentice superintendent of their affairs in the beloved Gookin s place. LIEUT. EDWARD OAKES AND HIS TROOPERS. Edward Oakes came from England before 1640 ; freeman at Cambridge, May 18, 1642 ; brought from England wife Jane and sons Urian and Edward ; had baptized at Cambridge Mary and Thomas ; was selectman twenty-six years, from 1643 to 1678 ; deputy to General Court from Cambridge fifteen years, between 1659 and 1681, and from Concord 1683, 4 and 6 ; Lieutenant of Capt. Prentice s troop, June, 1675, and served in the summer campaign at Mount Hope, of which account is given above. The service for which the following credits are given was probably rendered in the winter of 1675-6. From the letter of Rev. John Wilson, of Medfield, February 14, 1675-6 (Archives, vol. 68, page 134), it appears that Lieut. Oakes was at Lancaster after its CAPT. PAIGE AT MT. HOPE. 85 destruction February 10th, and was afterwards scouting between Marlborough and Medfield, and at the attack on February 21, was quartered there with his troopers. Simon Crosby puts in a small bill for billeting his troop at Billerica, but date of service does not appear. He died at Concord, October 13, 1689, aged, probably, 85 years. Credits under Lieut. Edward Oakes. 1676 March 24 th 1675-6 James Miller. 01 12 John Gibson. 01 12 Solomon Phips, QatrMr. 02 09 Thomas Creswell (Croswell) 01 12 April 24 th John Hastings. Luke Perkins. Stephen Cooledg. Samuel Whiting. June 24 th Thomas Peirce. Thomas Edmons. William Reade. Jonathan Bunker. Stephen Paine. Thomas Henshaw. Stephen Richardson Christopher Grant. Thomas Strait. 1676 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 19 1<J 19 19 19 19 19 12 12 11 12 12 08 10 10 04 10 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 10 10 04 10 10 00 00 00 09 06 08 06 John Seers. 01 Timothy Simmes. 01 Matthew Griffin. 00 19 John Teed. 02 16 W m Auger (Agur,Alger) 01 12 10 Timothy Hawkins. 01 John Mousall. 01 Capt Oakes. July 24 th 12 10 12 10 1676 Jacob Hill. 00 19 08 Samuel Hayward. 01 10 00 Henry Spring. 01 12 10 Thomas Mitchenson. 00 19 08 Joseph Cooke. 04 02 00 Thomas Frost. 01 00 06 Edward Oakes. 06 11 00 August 24 th 1676. John Streeter. 00 19 08 James. Prentice. 00 18 00 Sept 23 d , 1676 John Green. 01 12 10 John Fowle. 01 19 04 CAPT. NICHOLAS PAIGE AND HIS TROOP. Capt. Nicholas Paige came from Plymouth, England. He was in Boston as early as 1665. In 1675, June 27th, was appointed captain of a troop to accompany Maj. Thomas Savage in the ex pedition to Mt. Hope ; took part in the movements there ; accom panied the army to Narraganset and back, and then returned to Boston with Major Savage and disbanded his men, and there is no farther account of any service in this war. Capt. Paige was active in business, and in civil affairs later on ; was of the Artillery Company, 1693 ; later its commander and a colonel. He died in 1717. He left no children, 1 and in the joint will of Nicholas and wife Anna, made in 1703, after many small legacies, gave the bulk of property, including the farm at Rum- ney-Marsh, where they lived, to their kinswoman Martha Hobbs, also made her executrix and gave her some good advice about marrying into a godly family. (She married Capt. Nathaniel Oliver, 1709, and had children, Paige and Martha.) Should she i See N. E. Hist, and Gen. Register, Vol. 23, p. 267. 86 KING PHILIP S WAR. fail of issue, the property goes to his cousin William Paige, of London, England. His wife Anna was a granddaughter of Capt. Robert Keayne and a niece of Gov. Joseph Dudley. Her first husband was Edward Lane. The following are the credits for his men in this campaign : August 23 d 1675 John Ballard. 02 00 00 John Breid. 02 00 00 Samuel Moore. 02 02 00 Sept. 3 d Samuel Giddings. 02 00 00 Joseph Proctor. 02 00 00 Nathaniel Engersell. 02 00 00 William Osborn. 02 00 00 Lawrence Hart. 02 00 00 Joseph Needham. 02 00 00 Nicholas Paige, Capt. 08 00 00 Francis Coard. 02 00 00 Enoch Lawrence. 02 00 00 Benjamin Wilkins. 02 00 00 Thomas Noyce, Cornef. 04 00 00 James Ford. 02 00 00 Ezekiel Mighill. 02 00 00 Thomas Tharly. 02 00 00 John Picard. Daniel Wycom. William Reeves. Nicholas Manning. John Whipple, Lieut. Francis Young. Ephraim Fellows. James Hoult. Joseph Safford. Thomas Newman. Uzall Wardall. Daniel Wilkins. Samuel Sillesbie. William Due. William Curtis. Daniel Welcom. Thomas Albey. Mark Hescall. 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 08 00 05 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 02 00 00 Thomas Noyce, of Newbury, was chosen, 1683, Capt. of the second Newbury company. John Whipple, appointed Cornet of Ipswich Troop in 1663, and then said to be "son of Elder Whiple." He was captain of a special Troop, Feb. 1675-6. IV. MAJOR THOMAS SAVAGE AND THE FORCES UNDER HIM. MAJOR THOMAS SAVAGE was born in Taunton, Somer set Co., England, son of William Savage. Came in the " Planter " to Boston, April, 1635, aged 27. Admitted freeman in May following ; was an original member of the Artillery Com pany, and was chosen its captain in 1651, and several times afterwards. He married Faith, daughter of William and Ann Hutchinson, in 1637, and for sharing the views of Ann and her brother-in-law, Rev. John Wheelwright, he was disarmed by the Court, and joined with Coddington and others in the purchase of Rhode Island, whither he removed in 1638, but returned the same year. By his wife Faith he had seven children between 1638 and 1652. Faith died February 20, 1652, and the following September he married Mary Symmes, daughter of Rev. Zechariah, of Charlestown, by whom he had eleven more children. He was almost constantly in public office, and was especially prominent in all the military affairs of the town from 1651 onward. He was captain of 2d Boston militia company from 1652 to his death in 1682. It is the purpose, in this chapter, to give as fully as possible the operations under Major Savage, and facts connected with this Mt. Hope campaign, and the names of men serving with him not previously mentioned, so that our account of the campaign may be considered complete. Some details of the opening prepara tions are here given, as being rather connected with the move ments of the general force than separate companies. It will be remembered that the first actual attack of Philip was upon those people of Swansey who lived nearest to him. An account of this attack was sent to the Massachusetts Council by Gov. Josiah Winslow of Marshfield. His letter is in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 202, dated June 21st, and says the attack was made on the day before, and asks the Massachusetts Colony for aid only in protecting them from the alliance of Philip with the Narraganset and Nipmuck l Indians, which tribes are within 1 The term Nipmuck or Nipnet, is used here and elsewhere often, as if including the Quabaugs, Nashaways, Wabbaquassets, Pocomptucks, and others. 88 KING PHILIP S WAR. the jurisdiction of Massachusetts ; says that if Plymouth can have " fair play " with their own Indians he trusts they can take care of themselves. On the same paper is a copy of the answer of the Council, assuring him of immediate assistance, and that they will send messengers with all speed to both Narragansets and Nip- mucks. This answer is dated June 21, "at 5 o clock." On the same day an order was passed in the Council to Capt. Edward Hutchinson, Seth Perry and William Towers, giving commission and instruction for taking a warning message to the Narragansets, and to leave a letter for Roger Williams at Provi dence. This message is in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 201, in a paper directed to " Moosucke [Mootucke], Ninigret & Squa Sachem, of the Narraganset & Nyantic Indians." A paper con taining the agreements of the Nipmuck chiefs is in vol. 30, page 169, of the Mass. Archives. Upon June 24th came news of the general outbreak, and further appeal from Plymouth. The Council hastily despatched two messengers to Philip, who, arriv ing at Swansey, discovered the two men who were slain that day lying in the road, and thus warned of the futility of their peace ful mission, they returned to Boston without speaking with Philip. I find by a letter from the Council to Gov. Winthrop of Connecticut, that these two messengers were Capt. Savage and Mr. Brattle. This letter is of great importance in several respects in the light it throws upon those few busy days. It is in the Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 209, and is the original draft, containing many erasures and corrections. It is judged to be in the hand writing of Thomas Danforth, who was then First Commissioner of the United Colonies. It is endorsed by Edw. Rawson, as follows : " Rough draft of Council s letter to Connecticot Gov r . Ent. June 28, 1675." The figure 8 in the date is somewhat obscure, but the reference in the letter to the Fast appointed for " to-morrow " (which fast we know to have been on the 29th) proves the date of writing to have been on the 28th. Extract of the Massachusetts Council s letter of June 28, 1675, to the governor of Connecticut : and dayly wee heare of the Increase of trouble the Gov r of y l Colony [Plymouth] hath frequently solicited us for Ayde w h as soone as wee could possibly Raise wee have sent to y cm . It s certified from Plymouth and Swansey that both the Narragansets and Monhe- gins have sent ayd to Phillip. We sent messengers to the Narragan sets & Nipmucks to warn & caution them not to Assist Phillip or if any were Gon to command their returne, our messengers are returned from both those places, the Nipmucks speake faire and say that they are faithful to the English and will not Assist Phillip, the Narragansets say they will not medle but there is more reason to suspect the latter and wee believe Uncas is not unconcerned in this matter, all our intelli- COUNCIL S LETTERS TO CONNECTICUT. 89 gence gives us ground to believe that the poore people in those parts are in a very distressed condition in many respects, their houses burned, their people kild & wounded they not able to make any Attempt upon the Indians wanting both victuall ammunition and arms w ch hath occasioned us to send greatt forces for their reliefe, we have sent above three hundred foot and about eighty horse besides several carts laden with munition and with goods and provisions and armes, moreover we are sending two vessels with provision and munition to supply y e forces, y e vessells to serve as there shall be cause, We sent Capt. Savage and Mr. Brattle 4 days since to speake with Philip who are returned but could not obtaine speech with him, The Council have appointed a fast to-morrow to seek God in this matter and a blessing upon our forces, How far his tribes may spread is with the Lord our God to order, There is reason to concieve y if Phillip be not soone [suppressed?] he and his confederates may skulke into the woods and greatly anoy the English & y l the confederacy of the Indians is larger than yet we see. Maj. Gen" Denison was chosen for to goe General of these forces, but he being taken ill Capt. Savage is sent Commander- in-chief, Capt Prentis commanding y e horse, Capt. Henchman and Capt Mosley, Capts of y e foot, Our eyes are unto y e Lord for his presence w th y em , & hope you will not be wanting in y r prares and watchfulness over the Indians, and particularly we request you to use y r utmost authority to restrain the Monhegins & Pequods. E. R. Sec y. By inquiry I found that this letter, dated June 28th, is pre served in the Connecticut Archives, and also two others which are not in our own. By the kind offices of Mr. Charles J. Hoadly, State Librarian of Connecticut, I have been furnished complete copies of both. One is of July 5th and the other July 10th. Extracts of these letters are given below, from Conn. Arch., War Docs., Vol. I. Doc. 5 : Boston July 5 th 1675 Hon d Gent n By our former dat. the 3 d of this instant wee gave you a briefe account of the late outbreaking of the Indians in the Plimouth Colony at Swanzie and p to adjac 4 and since y wee received the enclosed declaring the deplorable condition of those at Taunton in the same Colony wee have at their request accomodated them with ammunition and men, ie. ab 4 80 troopers furnished with carbines & small musketts ab 1 100 dragoones & ab 4 100 foote soldjers so that with their attendance for waggons &c. y e whole may be neere 400 men also two vessells well fitted with men provisions & ammunition we have sent ab 1 the Cape to accomodate all their necessityes so far as wee could judge necessary, &c. The remainder of the letter discusses the affairs of the United Colonies relating to the arming and management of the Indians not yet engaged with Philip, and is signed by Edward Rawson, Sec y, on behalf of the Court, and is superscribed, These to the Right Worshipf 11 John Winthrop Esq r Gov e n r of his 90 KING PHILIP S WAR. Maj tys Colony at Connecticot p r sent, To be communicated to the Coun cil there. Extract of the letter of July 10 th 1675. Conn. Arch., Wai- Docs., Vol. I. Doc. 7 : . . . Capt Hutchinson w" 1 ab 100. of our forces went from o r headquarters upon Tuesday last to y e Narrogansets to demand an ace 4 of their actings wee expect hourely intelligence w they have done there which will be a great guide to us in our further motions. . . . Yesterday came six men sent from Uncas to assure his friendship & offer his service ag l Phillip or other enemyes of y e English with a 1 re from Mr. Fitch to whome wee have returned o r answer declaring to Uncas y if he will send hostages to y e English for the assurance of his faithfulness wee shall accept his offer &c. &c. Signed EDWARD RAWSON, Sec y By order of the Council. In Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 207, is the Court s instruction to Thomas Savage as major of the Massachusetts forces in this expedition under Major Gen. Denison as commander-in-chief of the colony, closing thus : " And in case the Lord should disenable y r General so as to take him of the service you shall take charge and command of all according to the commission given unto him," etc. Major Savage had been commissioned for this expedition on or before June 24th, and the Court had then voted to raise one hun dred horse and fifty foot. These constituted the companies of Henchman and Prentice, and together with Capt. Mosely s men, made up the number to two hundred and sixty men, besides officers and teamsters, etc., which force, estimated in round num bers at three hundred, marched out of Boston on June 26th. As to the exact time of Major Savage s marching, or the force with him, the accounts are somewhat vague and conflicting. I give briefly the various references bearing upon this point ; and first, it is certain that Capt. Paige s troop numbered, according to the treasurer s credits, thirty-six men including officers. The state ment in the above letter claims over three hundred and eighty men to have been sent, up to June 28th. In Mather s " Indian War," strangely enough, no mention is made of Major Savage in relation to this first campaign. And Mr. Hubbard, the most reliable of all, relates in reference to this particular, that Major Savage came up " with other supplies " on the evening of June 29th. On the next day they moved forward into Mount Hope neck, " with a troop of horse in each wing; " encamping that night (June 30th) " in the open field " in a heavy rain. Next day (July 1st) they marched back to Swansey. That night Capt. Prentice s troop rode to Seekonk, and Major Savage appears to have remained at Swansey, July 2d, awaiting MAJOR SAVAGE S STAFF, SUPPLIES, ETC. 91 their return. On July 3d Henchman and Prentice searched the swamps between Swansey and Rehoboth, and Capt. Mosely " and Capt. Paige with his dragoons attending on Major Savage," marched back into Mount Hope. Mr. Church s account is ex tremely vague in reference to this campaign, especially in regard to the Massachusetts forces, making no mention of Maj. Savage by name. After a diligent search among published accounts and unpublished sources of information, I am unable to find any fur ther reference giving light upon this point, except that the Journal has no credits under Major Savage for this campaign, save the following, viz. : Sept 3 d 1675 Thomas Savage for service as Major and other charges, 22 00 00 Sept. 28th. John Paine. 02 00 00 John Williams. 01 04 00 Theophilus Frary, Commissary. 03 04 00 .... Toten, Chirurgeon. 16 00 00 Jacob Eliott, Commissary. 00 15 00 Feby 29 th 1675-6 Peter Geniiings. 01 10 00 William Locke was the regular surgeon who went out with the army on June 26th (Mass. Archives, vol. 69, pages 58 and 60). This " Toten " was Dr. John Touton, a Huguenot, who at this time lived at Rehoboth, and his service may be inferred in part by the following order in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 221 : Order to Mr. John Toton to take " Peter Sympkins, Robert Smith and Isaac Ratt, to attend " him and " go for the reliefe of the wounded " . . . " and in case of their refusal you are reqired by the Constables to send them forthwith to Capt. Hud son who is required to send them to Boston." Dated July 22, 1675. Mr. Joseph Dudley also went out with Major Savage, and received on Sept. 14th credit of 08 11 04, for salary as chaplain. In regard to the two vessels, I find in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 211, the following papers : Committee imployed for this present Expedition against the Indians, ordered to send the following provisions aboard the Sloope Swanne, whereof Samuel Woodbery is master to be sent for the supply of our forces, Viz 2000 weight of Bisket, 40 barrells of pease in casks, 10 Barrells of Pork, 10 Kintalls of drye fish, 1 hogshead of Rumme, six jarrs of oyle, 4 barrells Raisins, 1 Barrell of sugar, 1 hogshead of salt, f cask of wine. Moreover you are to load aboard the Brigaudine called the [Joseph] whereof Edward Winslow is Master the like quantity of provisions as above expressed abating two barrells of Raisings & with two barrels of powder one in each vessell. . . You are also to take bills of lading of these goods and to bee 92 KING PHILIP S WAR. delivered to the Commissaries of the Army Theopholus Frary and John Moss or either of them. Dated in Boston 28 June 1675 By the Council E. R. Sec y. And on page 211, same date : Instructions to Edward Winslow, Master of the Joseph. You are hereby ordered forthwith as wind and weather will permit with your vessell to sail to Swansey or as near thereunto as you may and there deliver to Left Theophilus Frary and John Morse, Commis saries for this Colony and the forces (now) under the conduct of Major Thomas Savage all such provisions Armes &c now on board you for the use of the army. Signed JOHN LEVERET, Gov r . It will be seen by this supply, that Massachuseetts then, as always since, showed a generous appreciation of the appetites of her soldiers. To the uninitiated the above bill of fare may not seem particularly inviting ; but to any one who has been a soldier and knows the meaning of " pea-porridge-hot," the item " 40 bar rels of pease" will carry its own convictions. "Bisket, stripped fish and raisins," as marching rations, compare favorably, accord ing to my experience, with the " hard-tack " and " salt-horse " furnished us by the U.S. Commissaries in 1861-5. I cannot testify to the "Rumme," as I belonged to a Maine regiment; but many times I have sat down by the camp-fire to a dipper of "pea- porridge-hot " and a sop of bread, as to a royal feast. In the line of the above information is this curious old paper in vol. 68, page 135. A " Committee s estimate of what Provi sions &c will serve 500 souldiers one month." " Biskett 15 m , Porke 20 barrills, Beefe 30 barrills (or some think only Pork and send salt), Bacon 10wt. Cheese 10 : Stockins & Shooes 200 p r each, Shirts & Draws 100 of each, Wastcoats 50, Walletts 100, 300 small baggs for each man to carry nokake, 300 bush oates, 100 bush barley, 50 bush Indian corne parched and beaten to nokake, 6 bar. powder, 12 cwt shott, Flints 20 ct ." It appears from the letter above of July 5th, that these two vessels had sailed before that date. From Hull s Journal, pages 10 and 11, which I have restored from the Ledger, the following credits are obtained : August 20, 1675 Maritime Disbursements Dr to Viz. Samuel Woodbury. 1 Robert Breck. Joshua Matson. 03 00 01 01 05 00 01 10 00 Nath 1 Phillips. 01 10 00 Henry Rock als. Cock 01 10 00 William Cantrell. 01 10 00 1 In Vol. II. Colonial History of New York, Holland Documents, I find by report of a council held at Fort William Hendrick, May 26, 1674, that " Capt. Cornells Ewoutse arrived here this day with his Snow the Zehont, reports having captured three small New England prizes." One of these was the Sloop Swan, of which Samuel Woodbury was master, who appeared and declared that he lived at Swansey and was part owner of the Sloop, and that John Dixy s widow of Swan- Bey owned the other part, and that he was captured " near Prudence Island." The vessel and cargo were confiscated by the New York Colony, but on June 29 following were released. NAVAL CONTINGENT. 93 Nathaniel Gallop. 02 00 00 Thomas Alson. 01 10 00 William Hascall. 01 10 00 Samuel Cross. 02 16 00 John Kennedye Als. Cannede. 02 09 00 John Ball. 02 09 00 William Aldridg. William Christian. Nathaniel. Huett. Redeemed. Scott. Simon Daniel. Thomas Norton. John Mane. Edward Perkins. 03 10 00 02 09 00 02 09 00 02 09 00 02 09 00 02 09 00 02 02 00 03 19 00 The first nine in the above list I presume to have been the master and crew of the " Sloope Swanne ; " the rest were probably on the " Brigandine " Joseph. Edward Winslow was master we know, and Samuel Winslow was of the crew of this vessel, as I find by this order of the Council, July 24th (Archives, vol. 67, page 226) : " Ordered that Edward & Samuel Winslow, now on board the Brigandine be released to come home." By the letter of Capt. Henchman, published heretofore, it appears that he left this vessel at Pocasset on July 31st, when he went in pursuit of Philip, leaving five files of his men at Fort Leverett. And I infer that the vessel had left that place before August 9, when he was ordered by Gen. Denison to return and draw off the men, since he was to leave there such provisions and ammunition as " for want of carriage " he could not bring with him. In regard to other matters referred to in the above letters, it will be seen that the statement, in the letter of July 5th, of forces sent, is simply a restatement of that in the former letter, and not, as might appear at first, additional forces sent to Taun- ton. No such additional forces and no other vessels were sent at that time. Capt. Edward Hutchinson was despatched to the forces at Mount Hope on July 3d, and paid 5.00. 00 on that day by the Court s order. There went with him, as appears by the Journal credits, the following men : Edward Hutchinson jun r 00 12 00 John Bennet. 00 19 00 Sam 1 Williams. 00 10 00 Hugh Clark. 00 10 00 John Pason. 00 10 00 John Minott. Nathaniel Holmes. John Ruggles. Dec r James Barrett 00 00 00 10 00 10 00 12 00 20. 1675 00 12 00 The explanation of the passage in the letter of July 10th, relating that Capt. Hutchinson with about one hundred men went from our headquarters to the Narragansets, etc., is probably this : In their orders to Major Savage by Hutchinson, the Court doubtless left the details of the embassy to the discretion of the officers at Mount Hope, and they determined to march in full force. Hubbard relates that Capt. Mosely crossed over by water to attend Capt. Hutchinson in his despatch, the others going around. It is likely that Capt. Hutchinson sent back some of 94 KING PHILIP S WAR. his own men with the message of his departure, and from this the Court made their report to Connecticut Colony. The negotiations with the Mohegans, of whom Uncas was chief sachem, are of peculiar interest, but must be deferred to a separate chapter, with only brief allusion here. On the return of the six Indians referred to in the letter, Ephraim Curtis was sent to conduct them, taking along three Natick Indians, who volunteered to accompany him. They went by way of Marlbo- rough, where, at the Indian fort, they were warned of the danger of the journey by the friendly Indians gathered there, and Curtis heard of the plundering of his own house at " Quansigamug " (Worcester) and was shown some of the plunder which the marauders, the Nipmucks, had brought thither, and thereupon the Naticks declined to go on unless more men were added to their force. Upon his application to the constables of Marlbo- rough, two men with horses and arms were pressed for this ser vice. These were John and James Barnard, who receive credit in the Journal under date of Sept. 14th, 1675. With this party he conducted the Mohegans safely home, and on his return sought out the Quabang sachems and had a romantic interview with them. A full account of this journey may be found in his long and interesting letter, of July 16th, to the Court, preserved in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 215. The result of the negotia tions with Uncas was that he sent two of his sons to Boston as hostages, and his eldest son and successor, Oneko, with fifty men, to assist the English against Philip. These were sent to Plymouth Colony under the conduct of " Quartermaster Swift and a ply of horse," as Major Gookin relates. Their subsequent proceedings, joining with the Rehoboth men in the pursuit and battle with Philip, their brief service with Capt. Henchman and return home, have been related in a former article. The Mohe gans got as wages the plunder they seized from Philip. Swift and his " ply of horse " were credited as follows, Sept. 16th, 1675: Joseph Crosbey. 00 07 06 Thomas Smith. 00 07 06 Thomas Blighe. 00 07 06 Samuel Blighe. 00 07 06 Sept 28 th 1675 William Harris. 00 07 06 Asaph Elliott. 00 07 06 James Barrett. 00 07 06 March 25th 1675-6 Moses Pain. 00 07 06 Thomas Swift was the son of Thomas the Emigrant, from Yorkshire, Eng., who settled in that part of Dorchester which is now Milton. Married Elizabeth Vose, daughter of Robert, 9th Thomas Swift, Corporal. Martin Sanders. 00 13 06 00 07 06 Samuel Hayden. Ebenezer Hayden. 00 07 06 00 07 06 Benjamin Badcocke. Samuel Whiting. Nathaniel Bullard. 00 07 06 00 07 06 00 07 06 William Hawkins. 00 07 06 Thomas Toleman. 00 07 06 Joseph Penneman. 00 07 06 ESTIMATE OF FORCES EMPLOYED. 95 Dec. 1657, and had Thomas, Elizabeth, William, John, and Samuel. He died 31st Jan., 1718. The other company of Indians that went out in this campaign was enlisted by Major Gookin from the various friendly tribes about Boston, agreeably to an order of the Court of July 2d, and to the number of fifty-two marched out of Boston on July 6th, under the conduct of Capt. Isaac Johnson, who delivered them to Major Savage at Mt. Hope, and then " returned back." Seventeen of these were with Capt. Henchman when he crossed from Pocasset to Providence, July 31st, in pursuit of Philip. Others were credited, as we have seen, under Capt. Prentice, the rest returned to their homes " after 25 days," according to Major Gookin. The popular prejudice against these Praying Indians seems to have extended to our early historians, who, except Gookin, seldom mention them or their service ; and since they were not generally credited on the treasurer s book, it is extremely difficult to give a correct account of them. According to the testimony of Major Savage, Capts. Henchman and Pren tice, " most of them acquitted themselves courageously and faithfully," and we know that the Mohegans, in company with the Rehoboth men, did the most effective fighting of the whole campaign. We have noted the various elements that made up this expe dition under Major Savage, and now, counting the regular forces that went out at first under Henchman, Prentice and Mosely as 250 men, and under Paige 35, we have but 285 men, 95 less than the number stated in the letter of June 28th. This seems a large number to allow as guards and attendants, but I think that some twenty-five or thirty men besides Paige s troop went out with Major Savage and joined the companies already there. It will be remembered that 121 men were credited under Capt. Henchman, nearly all of whom, after a diligent comparison of their credits and subsequent service, I conclude must have joined him as early as July 1st. And this reckoning still leaves a large margin for attendants and guards. The round number of " about 400 " in the letter of July 5th may have included the men of Capt. John son, who conducted the 52 " Gookin " Indians, but not, I think, the Indians themselves. It is barely possible that the crews of the two vessels were counted, making about twenty men addi tional. The reference to " dragoons " is explained by the fact that Capt. Henchman s company was furnished with horses. The " Guards and Carriage " account does not show an amount of expense corresponding to the large number apparently em ployed for that service, the total amount for the several cam paigns up to January 25, 1675-6, being but X16.10.00. Some of the guards in his first expedition were charged directly to Plymouth Colony, those evidently who guarded the carts sent with ammunition, etc., to supply their wants. The following 96 KING PHILIP S WAR. were thus charged at ,00. 03s. OOd. apiece for guarding their ammunition : Richard Smith, Thomas Lawrence, James Hoxly, James Montt, Ebenezer Hill. And these are all that I can find credited as guards for this expe dition, so that I must leave the discrepancy between the numbers that plainly appear from the Journal credits and other various sources, and the statement of the letter of June 28th, to be filled in by the number of officers, doctors, quartermasters and their attendants, and also allow for some who returned home sick or disabled, or else deserted and received no credit on the books, though reckoned in the statement of the Court. This campaign closed, as concerned Major Savage, when he returned to Boston about July 20th. Major Savage appears not to have been actively engaged in the war after this campaign until the following February, but in the mean time as an enterprising merchant, a town commissioner, captain of an important company of Boston militia, with charge of its training and the impressment of quotas for active service, the latter a difficult and trying matter, we can see that he was not idle. The situation of affairs in the colonies at the beginning of February, 1675-6, was somewhat as follows : The summer and autumn campaigns in the west had not made any material gain for the English except in experience ; the Narraganset campaign had resulted in driving that tribe and the Mount Hope Indians to the north and west ; their women, children and old people, that survived the Fort fight, were scattered about amongst the various tribes nearest them ; Philip and his fighting men were thus left free to range up and down, overawing the smaller tribes, inciting the stronger to hostility against the colonies ; his agents and friends were active in all the tribes ; himself with a body of his men had retired as far as the woods above Albany, where they were supplied with abundance of arms and ammunition by the Dutch ; as a wanderer and outlaw he had nothing further to lose and everything to gain by the war ; the young men of the tribes looked upon him as a great leader, and were eager to follow him ; large bodies of Indians were drawn together in various places ; most of the Nipmucks, with some Narragansets, were encamped at Wenimesset (now New Braintree) ; many others from different tribes had gathered about Mount Wachuset ; another large encampment was at Squakeag (Northfield) and beyond, whither many of the tribes about Springfield and Hadley had withdrawn. And all these made common cause with Philip, and were in an attitude of warfare. Thus Philip, at bay, and with nearly the whole force of the New England tribes in active sympathy with him, was far more dangerous than at Mount Hope. The Eng lish, on the other hand, were weary of the war which they had carried on for seven months, at immense expense of means and men, without apparent gain. The people in the frontier towns STATE OF AFFAIRS, MIDWINTER, 1675-6. 97 were mostly withdrawn into garrisons, their homes broken up, farms laid waste, and they living in constant dread of the lurk ing enemy. /Military skill and bravery could avail but little against the tactics of a skulking foe, who came when and where least expected, nearly always striking those least prepared, apply ing the torch, shooting from the safe covert of the woods, and, before effective resistance could be offered, vanishing again to the forests. The Indians were intimately acquainted with the habits and plans of the colonists and knew just when to strike and where, while the English knew nothing of their movements except from the friendly Indians, whom they mostly distrusted. The English had many of these friendly Indians acting as spies and scouts, who circulated quite freely among Philip s allies, and brought intelligence of their plans ; but their reports were often received with distrust, and the Council was slow to act upon them, and in many cases their neglect was followed by disaster. One of these spies, James Quannapohit, alias Rumney- marsh, after visiting the Nipmucks at Wenimesset, near Brook- field, brought word to Boston on January 24th, of the intended attack upon Lancaster and other towns, but too little heed was paid to his warning, and so these places were one by one attacked, and several destroyed. Such was the posture of affairs in February, 1675-6, when Philip was preparing to strike an effectual blow against the colonies. On February 6th, the army returning from the Nar- raganset country to Boston, was disbanded. On the 8th the Commissioners of the United Colonies voted to raise another army of six hundred men for a campaign in the west. No quota was required from Plymouth. On the 10th Lancaster was attacked by the Nipmucks. On the 15th Mosely and his com pany were ordered to Sudbury, and about that time Capt. Oakes with his troop was scouting from Lancaster to Medfield, and was at the latter place when it was assaulted on the 21st. On that day the Council voted to raise one hundred foot and seventy-two troopers to fill the Massachusetts quota of the proposed arnry. Major Savage was captain of this foot company, but when he was commissioned as commander of the Massachusetts troops ori the 25th, his lieutenant, Benjamin Gillam, succeeded to that com pany s command. Capt. John Whipple was appointed to com mand the troopers, and Capt. William Turner marched out with another company of foot. John Curtice and six friendly Indians from the Island were to serve as guides. The Massachusetts forces were ordered to march immediately to Brookfield, to join the Connecticut men under Major Treat, and Major General Denison was appointed commander-in-chief of the combined forces, and ordered to Marl- borough to direct the movements of the army. The Massachusetts forces joined those of Connecticut under 98 KING PHILIP S WAR. Major Treat on the 2d or 3d of March at Brookfield, and advanced to attack the Indians at Wenimesset, but the enemy, having intelligence of the design, fled before our troops arrived. Our dragoons, it is said, followed a part of these as far as Paquayag (Athol), where they crossed the river and escaped towards Northfield. Mrs. Rowlandson was with them a captive, in this retreat, and gives an account of the affair. They arrived at Northfield on March the 7th, went up the river and crossed to the west bank, where on the 9th they joined Philip and a large body of Indians encamped there. By this pursuit, and against the earnest advice of the Natick scouts, our army was diverted from the intention of attacking the Indians gathered near Mount Wachuset, and instead marched into Hadley on March 8th. Their coming, however, seems to have been opportune, as the evident design of the large force of Indians gathered near was upon the towns on the river. On the 9th they attacked West- field with a small force, and on the 14th assaulted Northampton in full force, but were repulsed, Major Treat and the Connecticut forces having entered the town the evening before, and Capt. Turner s company being already stationed there. The further details of this expedition must be deferred to the future accounts of garrisons and the several captains and their companies. In a letter of March 28th Major Savage gives the Council some account of his movements, of the attack upon the people at Long- meadow, of the withdrawal of the Connecticut forces, of the gathering of large numbers of Indians about Deerfield and North- field, and the danger threatening those towns. This letter is in the Mass. Archives, vol. 68, page 189. The following letter of the Council to Major Savage shows something of the closing movements of this campaign, and is copied in full from the original in Mass. Archives, vol. 68, page 191. It is dated 1st April, 76. Maj r Savage, Wee receved your letters by the post dated 28 th of march and perceve both by yo rs and Mr. Newel s letters that Coneticut forces are drawne of & that by reason of the numerousnes of the enimy (according to yo r information) you are not in a capacity to pursue y m , also you mtimate y e feai-es of the people of these townes y in case you bee drawne of w th y or forces y l they wilbe in danger to be destroyed by the enimy allso wee understand that the townes are unwilling to attend our advise to draw into a narrow compass whereby wee conceved they would have been able to deffend themselves better, but Northampton desires more soldiers to be added to y er former number, they offer to mayn- tayne all soldiers both for wages and victuall the result of the Council touching this matter is y l wee are willing for present that you leave soldiers to assist those townes not exceeding 150 men choosing such as are fittest for that service and as neare as you can All single men Leaving Capt. Turner in Capt Poole place ; with the Rest of the Army we exp slv comand you to draiv homeward & endeav r in y r returne to visit COUNCIL S LETTER TO MAJOR SAVAGE. 99 y" enimy about Backquake & bee careful not to bee Deseved by y er lap wing stratagems: by drawing you of from if nest to follow some men; Butt if Maj r Treat and the Conetecut forces should returne & y 1 it be advisable to march after y c enimy to Dearfeld &c. wee leave you to y or liberty to act as you shall judge Best; but if y c *and you are thereby Conetect men returue not or after a returne draw Incapacitated to fur- . i i ther ace" by reason of of again,* then o r exp esse order is to bee upon y or flight U of"y9 enimy or march homewards & in y or returne to endevor to visit the enimy as in o r past was exp rssed ; If you should not meet with the enimy then we order you to retreat to Marlborow and wait their for further orders** .... **from them sent in another letter \y ee nave } at j e sen t Capt. GraVS of CharleS- to hire as news by order & both r signed i* April 76. town with about 50 men and oO horses laden B R by C ord* w ^ n provisions & Ammunition to Qua- bauge ordering him to take y e charge of y Garrison for p r sent and to returne y e horses & men w th S rt Ingram, so y 1 wee wilbe sufficiently recruited w th ammunition at y e fort at Qua- bauge, touching that Rebuke of God upon Cap 1 Whiple and y e poore people at Springfield it is matter of great shame and humbling to us. The inteligence by the woonded woman of what y e enimy said to her ; wee have reason to aprehend much of it is false & y they have not such numbers at Dearefield neither are the Narragansetts or Nipmucks there ; o r Reasons are because at this p r sent time & before y or letter were dated a great Boddy of Indians and wee conceive they are Nar ragansetts have done great mischeif at Secuucke and Providence neare Secuucke upon last Lorday Capt Peirce with about 100 English & indians Ingaged with a great body of them about 5 miles from Secunke neare Mr Blackston the consequent of w ch fight was y 4 Peirce was slaine and 51 English more with him & 11 Indians y 1 Assisted him their escaped of y e whole company not above 7 or 8 English & y e rest the enimy tooke all y r arms and two horse loads with provisions ; there was a great body of indians as y e escaped report & environed y m Round Capt. Peirce with a smaler p ty had a skirmish with about 50 of them y e day before and did y m mischeif e & came of without loss w th [sic]. On the same Lord day another party of indiaus assalted Malborow in y e time of afternone execise they burnt 13 deserted houses & 11 barns at y time & 3 men were wounded. The towne of Lancaster is wholly deserted Groton can abide no longer y" untill carts bee sent to bring y m w ch will bee next weeke, Chelmsford wee feare will bee soone nessecated to do y e like & what Meadfeld and other f renters towns may shortly bee put upon y e Lord know, these things considered you may see the Nessecity of having o r Army nearer to us this day wee had intelligence of y e enimies assaulting and burning Providence and Rehobath : They earnestly sent for succor but we have y m not we have now about 700 men out in those westward parts at Marlboroh and o r other fronters and wee are at a plunge where to raise more & kepe the heart in any competent safty. Thus committing you to God desiring his presence with & protection over you wee Remaine Wee have sent out a single Indian from ye Island to carry A letter to y e enimy aboute redemption of Captives, hee [is] ordered to carry a flag of truce if hee come into your Army let him bee returned in safty. 100 KING PHILIP S WAR. The following are the credits given under Major Savage, whose company in this campaign, from February, 1675-6, to May, was under the immediate command of Lieut. Gillam : April 24 th 1676 Thomas Simkins. 01 10 00 Phillip Bullis. 00 18 00 Theophilus Thornton. 02 02 00 "William Pasmore. 00 18 00 Thomas Savage jr. 04 02 04 James Hughes. 00 18 00 Joseph Bodman. 01 12 06 June 24 th 1676. Thomas Williams. 02 02 00 Joseph Pollard. 02 01 00 Thomas Bridges. 02 02 00 Jonathan Fairbanks. 03 07 00 Thomas Savage, Major. 28 00 00 Maurice Truelove. 01 16 00 John Williams. 02 02 00 Richard Keates. 02 02 00 James Chevers. 02 02 00 Phillip Bullis. 01 09 00 Daniel Landou , 02 02 00 Zibeon Letherland. 02 02 00 Richard Beffer. 01 16 00 Joseph Shaw. 02 02 00 Joshuah Hughes. 03 03 00 Joseph Gannett. 02 02 00 Francis Shepheard. 02 08 00 Thomas Clark. 01 12 06 Thomas Dure. 02 02 00 Samuel Douse. 02 02 00 William Pollard. 02 02 00 Zekery Fowle. 02 10 00 John Marsh. 02 02 00 James Boone. 02 02 00 Robert Smith. 02 02 00 John Mulbery. 03 07 00 John Wiswall. 04 11 00 Gilbert Cole. 02 04 00 James Lowdeu. 03 07 00 David Rainsford. 02 06 00 John Sage. 01 13 04 Joseph Andrews. 02 02 00 Thomas Chapman. 01 19 04 Richard Scott. 03 07 00 July 24 th 1676 Henry Phillips. 02 02 00 Samuel Rigbey. 03 14 00 Richard Woody. 02 09 06 Richard Woods. 02 01 00 Benjamin Gillam, Lieut. 05 15 00 Joseph Pecke. 02 13 00 Samuel Rust. 02 02 00 Benjamin Badcock. 03 07 00 John Hand. 01 16 10 John Alger. 01 03 04 Samuel Meares. 02 09 00 William Gerrish. 06 11 00 John Hull. 09 06 00 George Abbott. 02 02 00 James Hughes. 02 02 00 Christopher Cole. 01 16 00 Nathaniel Richards. 03 07 00 Charles Blinco 01 16 00 Henry Cooke. 01 18 06 John Mansell. 01 17 08 John Goff. 02 02 00 Thomas Wright. 02 02 00 Thomas Read. 01 13 04 John Sargent. 01 17 08 Moses Pain. 02 11 04 August 24 th 1676 Benjamin Burges. 02 12 02 John Wells, jr. (Weld) 01 16 00 John Chapman. 02 02 00 Jonathan Barker. 02 02 00 Samuel Bill. 02 02 00 James Brayley. 03 03 00 Edmund Gage. 02 02 00 William Stratton. 02 02 00 Ezekiel Levitt. 02 01 00 Thomas Howard. 03 10 00 Manasses Beck. 02 09 00 Thomas Emes,als.Eames.01 08 04 John Figg. 02 01 00 Joseph Knight. 02 02 00 Benjamin Thurston. 03 03 00 Sept. 23 d Joseph Newell. 01 18 06 Henry Willis. 01 16 10 Richard Rogers. 06 17 00 John Ruggles. 02 07 00 Simon Rogers. 02 00 02 Richard Suowden. 01 16 00 In accordance with his instructions Major Savage withdrew CLOSE OF WESTERN CAMPAIGN. 1C1 his troops about April 7th, leaving one hundred and fifty-one men with Capt. Turner to garrison the towns, and with four companies under Capts. Mosely and Whipple, and Lieutenants Gillam and Edward Drinker, marched homeward. On arriving at Brookfield a council of war was held to consider the later orders from the Council, advising an attack upon the Indians at Mt. Wachuset, but it was decided not advisable. (The officers had learned by experience the futility of pursuing the enemy with an army.) The expedition of Major Savage thus closed. The troops were either returned to Boston or engaged in other service, and there appear no further credits under his name. Accounts of Capts. Whipple and Turner are to be given here after, also of other officers mentioned in the letters. In Mass. Archives, vol. 68, page 203, there is an order of the Council to Gen. Denison to inspect the army returned under Major Savage, and discharging those unfitted for service to dispose of the rest as he shall judge best. The order was dated April 10, 1676. It seems that Mr. Samuel Nowell, chaplain, was a member of the council-of-war, and voted to march to Wachuset, but the officers Mosely, Whipple, Gillam and Drinker voted against it on the ground of insufficient supplies and sickness among the troops. See Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p, 235, V. CAPT. THOMAS WHEELER AND HIS MEN; WITH CAPT. EDWARD HUTCHINSON AT BROOKFIELD. HHHE genealogy of the Wheelers of Concord is a difficult JL problem, from the fact that as early as 1640-1 no less than seven heads of families of that name were in town, viz., George, Joseph and Obadiah among the first settlers. Ephraim, Thomas and Timothy settled in 1639, and a second Thomas who appears in 1640-1. All published accounts are defective, but the long and careful research of Mr. George Tolman, of Con cord, has done much to clear up the mystery. By a diligent comparison of Mr. Tolman s papers, kindly loaned me, with all I am able to glean from other sources, I derive the following account. Thomas Wheeler, first mentioned, removed to Fairfield, Con necticut, in 1644; his son Thomas settled on the farm he left in Concord, and married a wife Sarah before 1649. Mr. Savage erroneously identifies this latter with the Captain. But of Capt. Thomas, we know that he was the brother of Timothy, who mentions in his will, probated Sept. 7th, 1687, "Joseph, Ephraim and Deliverance my brother Thomas his sons." He married Ruth, daughter of William Wood, and from the record of deaths in Concord we find some account of their children. Alice died March 17, 1641 ; Nathaniel died January 9, 1676-7 ; Thomas died Jan. 17, 1676-7; Ephraim February 9, 1689. Joseph and Deliverance, mentioned in Timothy s will, were probably the sole survivors of the parents. It is possible that James Wheeler, who married Sarah Randall in 1682 and settled in Stow, was a son of Capt. Thomas and Ruth. " Capt. Thomas Wheeler, hus band of Ruth, died Dec. 10, 1676." Ruth the widow adminis tered upon his estate next year. Their son Joseph, in 1677, administered upon the estates of his brothers Thomas and Nathaniel. The estate of Thomas consisted of " a horse, pistols, cutlash and gun," and was prized at 6 12s. This was the Cap tain s son who saved his father s life at the fight in Brookfield. The son Joseph married Mary Powers and settled in Stow, Mass. Deliverance married Mary Davis, and also settled in Stow. Capt. Thomas was admitted freeman in 1642, was sergeant of the foot company of Concord in 1662, was appointed, at its organization in 1669, captain of the horse company, made up of troopers from several adjoining towns. He was in command of "CAPT. WHEELER S NARRATIVE." 103 this company in July, 1675, when it was called into the service of which some account is to be given. Of this the main facts are gathered from the very interesting " narrative " which he published in 1675, within a few months after the service was rendered. The title of this pamphlet has been transcribed by the kindness of A. C. Goodell, Jr., Esq., from a copy of the original edition belonging to the Essex Institute, which copy is bound up with the Rev. Peter Bulkeley s Sermon, and was per haps published with it. It is as follows : A True Narrative Of the Lord s Providences in various dispensations towards Captain Edward Hulchinson of Boston and my self, and those that went with us into the Nipmuck Country, and also to Q^labaug, alias Brookfield. The said Captain Hutchinson having a Commission from the Honoured Council of this Colony to Treat with several Sachems in those parts, in order to thepublick peace and my self being also ordered by the said Council to accompany him with part of my Troop for Security from any danger that might be from the Indians : and to Assist him in the Transaction of matters committed to him. Of this valuable publication contemporary historians availed themselves. Mr. Hubbard evidently used it freely and followed it fully in his account. Major Gookin refers to and quotes from it in his " History of the Praying Indians." But Rev. Nathan Fiske, pastor of the Third Church in Brookfield, who preached a centennial historical sermon in 1775 (which was published in 1776), seems not to have known of it, but follows Gov. Hutchin- son s history, who himself evidently had never seen it, at least does not notice it. And Rev. Joseph I. Foot delivered a His torical Discourse on Thanksgiving Day, November 7, 1828 (pub lished first in the same year), which discourse (says the Editor of the enlarged edition of 1843) was compiled by the author "after much inquiry and laborious research," and yet Mr. Foot seems to have been entirely ignorant of the existence of the " nar rative," and makes no mention of Capt. Wheeler, leaving the natural inference that he could hardly have read either Hub- bard s, Mather s or Gookin s History. The edition of 1843 con tains " Wheeler s narrative " in full ; and by the Editor s statement and a letter from Lemuel Shattuck, of Concord, it seems that Mr. Foot became aware of the existence of the pam phlet but did not receive it from Mr. Shattuck, who possessed two copies, until July, 1829, some time after his discourse was published, and even then Mr. Shattuck appears not to have known that the N. H. Historical Society had published the " Narrative " in their Collections two years before, with valuable annotations. In the edition of 1843, however, the Editor plainly used the publication of the N. H. Society, word for word title, introduction, notes and all, without addition or omission, though omitting to make acknowledgment of the same. On July 104 KING PHILIP S WAR. 4th, 1860, in his oration at the Bi-Centenmal Anniversary of the Settlement of Brookfield, Rev. Lyman Whiting gives a complete and eloquent account of the fight and subsequent defence of the garrison by Wheeler s troopers. And later Mr. H. E. Waite has made valuable investigations and has kindly furnished assistance, advice and material to the present writer, while the late Rev. J. H. Temple has made exhaustive researches, going over the whole ground and making a complete and detailed history of the whole affair in his " History of North Brookfield ; " publishing this account by Capt. Wheeler in full. It may be in order here to recall the situation of affairs and some of the circumstances that led up to this expedition to Brookfield. Having been twice warned of the designs of Philip, and his efforts to stir up the various chiefs of the Nipmucks, by Waban, the ruler of the Christian Indians at Natick, the Council at last began to realize that something ought to be done. And so, on June 13, 1675, an embassy was sent to the Quabaugs and the Nipmuck tribes to discover their intentions. The messengers visited the various Indian towns of Paka- choog, Maanexit, Wabaquasset, Quantisset, Chabonokongkomun, Manchaug and Hassanamesit, and received satisfactory promises from all the rulers of these towns that they would remain faith ful to the interests of the English. From the Quabaugs they received the following document, still preserved in the Archives. The Ruler of Quabage being examined by us where his men were : he said they were at home. Then we asked him whether there were none of them gone to help King Philip to fight against the English of Plymouth ; he said No ; and neither would he help him : for he has been false to him already, and, therefore, I will not help him : but I will still continue our subjection unto the English of the Massachusetts Colony ; neither will I suffer any of my men to go and help him ; and in con firmation of the same I do set my hand, 25 : 4 : 75. Conkcascogau, alias Conkganasco. The sachems who signed these agreements, for all were of the same purport, meant doubtless, to keep them. They were not aware that war had already begun at Mount Hope. And when Philip with his war-party came amongst them, they were at first inclined to stand aloof. But the war fever soon spread among the young braves, and Philip s agents went about sowing the seeds of disaffection, and making promises of great things to be done by the general uprising of all the tribes. Philip made presents of wampum to several of these chiefs ; and by the middle of July, four at least of them were in the great general war camp at Meminimisset, where Ephraim Curtis found them, on his first visit. This Ephraim Curtis was an important personage in the negotiations at this time and in the subsequent events. REVOLT OF THE STIPMUCKS. 105 He was the son of Henry, of Sudbury, about thirty-three years old at this time, a notable scout and hunter, well versed in Indian ways, and intimately acquainted with many of these tribes. He was also a trader, and had a house at Quansigarnug (Worcester). He gives a detailed and interesting account of this visit, to the Council. This account was published in full, in the " History of North Brookfield," by Rev. J. H. Temple. By this account it appears that Curtis was employed by the Council to go into the Indian country about Quabaug, and find out all he could about their present condition and probable designs. Three Christian Indians, from Natick, volunteered to go with him, and when he arrived at Marlboro , the constable there fur nished him with two men, mounted and equipped, and there also another Indian volunteered with him. At Marlboro he heard that his house at Quansigamug had been plundered, and that Mattoonas, the Nipmuck chief, with a large war-party, and some of Philip s men, was raiding the country to the southward. Holding their course through Brookfield, they came after several days to a place where the great body of the Indians were gathered. He says " These Indians have newly begun to settle themselves upon an Island containing about four acres of ground, being compassed around with a broad mirey swamp on the one side, and a muddy river with meadow on both sides of it on the other side, but only one place that a horse could possibly pass, and there with a great deal of difficulty by reason of the mire and dirt." The savages were in an ugly temper, and it was with much trouble that he finally prevailed upon them to listen to his mes sage, the Indians in his company pleading earnestly for him. At last he gained speech with the Sachems and found them to be Muttaump, Konkganasco, Willymachen, Upchattuck, Keehood, and Noncatonsoo. Of these Muttaump, the Sachem of Quabaug, was leader. Curtis judged that there were about two hundred warriors at the place. His conference with these Indians was on July 14th, and on that same day Mattoonas had attacked Mendon, and killed five men at work in the fields. This report of Curtis was made to the Council on July 16th, and greatly disturbed them, so that Curtis was at once despatched back to the Indians, with a message and with letters to Major Pynchon at Springfield. He returned from this second trip on July 24th, and reported that he was well received by the Indians who were at the same place, and that they had promised to send Keehood and another of the Sachems to Boston within four or five days to speak with the Governor. The Council, however, did not wait for this time to elapse, but determined to send a larger force to confer with the Indians, so as to enforce their demands if necessary. But they entirely misjudged the strength arid temper of the savages, and were deluded by their supposed knowledge that Philip was securely shut up in the swamp at Pocasset. 106 KING PHILIP S WAR. At a meeting of the Council on July 26th, Capt. Thomas Wheeler, of Concord, was summoned to appear at Boston next day at ten o clock, with twenty of his troop, to receive further orders. Capt. Edward Hutchinson was also called into service again, and on the 26th the following commission was issued to him. (Mass. Arch., vol. 67, p. 228). Boston 27. July 1675 The Council beeing informed y 1 the narraganset indians are come downe with about one hundred Armed men into the Nipmuck country, Do order you Capt Edward Hutcheson, to take with you Capt Thomas Wheler & his party of horse with Ephraim Curtis for a guide & a suffi cient interpreter, & forthwith to repaire into those parts & ther Laubour to get a right understanding of the motions of the Narraganset Indians & of y e indians of Nipmuck : and for that end to demand of the leaders of y e narragauset Indians an acc ot of y e grouns of y er marching in y country & require to understand the orders of their Sachems, And also to demand an Account of the Nipmuck Indians why they have not sent downe their Sagamore according to their promise unto o r messenger Ephraim Curtis, And further let y m know y wee are informed that there are some among them y have actually joyned with our enemies in the murder & spoyle made upon the English by Philip, And that Matoones & his Complices who have Robed & Murdered our people about Mendon are now among y" 1 And y 4 wee require them to deliver up to you or forthwith bring in to us those our enemies, otherwise wee must Looke at them to bee no friends to us, but ayders and abettors [st c] and unto all these things you shall require y er expr sse answer ; & as soon as you have dispatched the affayre, you are to returne home & give us an acct, so desiring the Lords pr r sence with you & in prose cution of this affayre if you should meet with any Indians that stand in opposition to you or declare y m selves to bee yo r enemies then you are ordered to ingage with them if you see reson for it & endeav r to reduce y m by force of Arms. " Capt. Edward Hutchinson was the eldest son of William and Ann, and came to this country from England with his uncle Edward Hutchinson, probably in September, 1633, a year before his parents came. His family were much interested in the civili zation of the Indians, and were widely known amongst them. Capt. Edward owned a large farm in the Nipmuck country, and had employed several of the sachems in tilling it. He was popular with the Indians, experienced in military matters, trusted by the colony, and had several times been sent to treat with different tribes, and was but lately returned from the treaty with the Narragansets." Such was the situation when, as we learn from Capt. Wheeler s narrative above mentioned, he, with about twenty of his troop, reported to the Council as commanded, and with Capt. Hutchin son marched, on July 28th, from Cambridge to Sudbury, and thence the next three days into the Nipmuck Country, They EXTRACT FROM WHEELER S STORY. 107 marched to within two miles of New Norwich, and finding all the Indians had fled from their towns, and meeting with but a few stragglers here and there, who fled from them, they marched back to Brookfield, arriving there Sunday, August 1st, and hear ing of Indians in great force about ten miles away, they sent out four men to treat with them. One of these was Ephraim Curtis (as I find by his testimony in the trial of the Wabaquassa Indian, Poquahow, for being engaged in the assault upon Capt. Hutchin- son and the rest), two I think were Brookfield men, and the fourth was probably one of the Indian guides. They met the Indians about eight miles from Brookfield in a swamp, and after the young warriors had blustered and threatened a long time, their sachems agreed to meet Capt. Hutchinson and his party next day at 8 o clock at a plain three miles from Brookfield. Capt. Hutchinson, accompanied by the troopers, scouts and three of the " chief men " of Brookfield went to the place appointed ; but no Indians appeared. Whereupon the officers suspected treachery, and were earnestly warned by the Indian guides not to go on; but the Brookfield men were so confident of the good faith of the Nipmucks, and urged so hard, that at last they prevailed, and the party marched on. As Capt. Wheeler relates the story : " The said Capt. Hutchinson, who was principally entrusted with the matter of Treaty with them, was thereby encouraged to proceed and march forward towards a swamp where the Indians then were. When we came near the said swamp, the way was so very bad that we could march only in a single file, there being a very rocky hill on the right hand, and a thick swamp on the left, in which there were many of those cruel blood-thirsty heathen, who there waylaid us, waiting an opportunity to cut us off ; there being also much brush on the side of the said hill, where they lay in ambush to surprise us. When we had marched there about sixty or seventy rods, the said perfidious Indians sent out their shot upon us as a shower of hail, they being (as was supposed) about two hundred men or more. We seeing ourselves so beset, and not having room to fight, endeavored to fly for the safety of our lives. In which flight we were in no small danger to be all cut off, there being a very miry swamp, into which we could not enter with our horses to go forwards, and there being no safety the way we came, because many of their company, who lay behind the bushes, and had let us pass by them quietly ; when others had shot, they came out and stopt our way back, so that we were forced as we could to get up the steep and rocky hill ; but the greater our danger was, the greater was God s mercy in the preservation of so many of us from sudden destruction. Myself being gone up part of the hill without any hurt, and perceiving some of my men to be fallen by the enemies shot, I wheeled about upon the Indians not calling on my men 108 KING PHILIP S WAR. who were left to accompany me, which they in all probability would have done had they known of my return upon the enemy. They fired violently from the swamp, and from behind the bushes on the hillside and wounded me sorely, and shot my horse under me, so that he faultering and falling, I was forced to leave him, divers of the Indians being then but a few rods distant from me. My son Thomas Wheeler flying with the rest of the company missed me amongst them, and fearing that I was either slain or much endangered, returned towards the swamp again, though he had then received a dangerous wound in the reins, where he saw me in the danger aforesaid. Whereupon he endeavoured to rescue me showing himself therein a loving and dutiful son, he adventuring himself into great peril of his life to help me in that distress, there being many of the enemies about me, my son set me on his own horse and so escaped awhile on foot himself, until he caught a horse whose rider was slain, on which he mounted, and so through God s great mercy we both escaped. But in this attempt at my deliverance he received another dangerous wound by their shot in his left arm. There were then slain to our great grief eight men, viz. : Zechariah Phillips, of Boston, Timothy Farlow, of Billericay, Edward Colborn, of Chelmsford, Samuel Smedly, of Concord, Sydrach Hapgood, of Sudbury, Serjeant Eyres, Serjeant Prichard, and Corporal Coy, the inhabitants of Brookfield, aforesaid. . . . There were also five persons wounded, viz. : Captain Hutchinson, myself and my son Thomas, as aforesaid ; Corporal French, who having killed an Indian, was (as he was taking up his gun) shot, and part of his thumb taken off, and also dangerously wounded through the body near the shoulder ; the fifth was John Waldoe, of Chelmsford, who was not so dangerously wounded as the rest. They also then killed five of our horses, and wounded some more, which soon died after they came to Brookfield." Thus far Capt. Wheeler s account is quoted directly. He then tells of their retreat back to the town, " as fast as the bad ness of the way and the weakness of our wounded would permit, we being then ten miles from it." There is little doubt that in this retreat the surviving members of the company were saved by the sagacity and fidelity of the two Indian guides, Sampson and Joseph Robin, sons of old Robin Petuhanit, a faithful Christian Indian. These two led them around by a way they knew, but unknown to any of the English, all the Brookfield men being killed. The popular prejudice against the Christian Indians is here illustrated, in the fact, that Capt. Wheeler was fully aware of the good service of these guides, and yet here gives them no credit for this nor for the urgent warning against entering the swamp. He afterwards gave them a certificate, testifying to this service. These two were afterwards so unjustly used by some of SIEGE OF BROOKFIELD. 109 the people that they were driven to join the fortunes of the hos tile Indians, to save their lives./ Sampson was killed by some English scouts near Wachuset, and Joseph was captured and sold into slavery in the West Indies. George Memecho was the third Indian guide with Capts. Wheeler and Hutchinson at Brookfield, and he was captured and kept prisoner for some time but finally returned and gave intelligent information of the condition of affairs among the hostile Indians. From Capt. Wheeler s further narration and from other authentic sources, we learn that after a circuitous and difficult march of ten miles the company came into Brookfield town, spreading the alarm among the inhabitants. There they at once seized and hastily fortified one of the larg est and strongest houses, said to have been the Inn of Sergt. John Ayres, just slain in the fight. The alarm spread through the town, and the inhabitants im mediately left their own houses and fled to the house held by the troopers ; in their fear, bringing very little with them, either of food or clothing. Capt. Wheeler, finding himself, by reason of his wound, unable to conduct the defence of the garrison, appointed to that office Simon Davis, of Concord, James Richard son and John Fiske, of Chelmsford. Within two hours after they returned to the town, the Captains sent out Ephraim Curtis, and Henry Young of Concord, to carry news of the disaster to the Council at Boston, but in this time the Indians had crept warily about the town, and were found by the messengers pillaging the outlying houses. Finding the way encompassed and the whole force of the enemy closing in upon them, the messengers returned to warn the garrison. Immediately the Indians came swarming upon them with fierce volleys and loud shoutings, " sending in their shots amongst us like hail through the walls." But one man, Henry Young, above mentioned, was killed, and that in the evening while looking out from the garret window ; and a son of William Pritchard (slain at the fight in the morning), who had ventured out of the garrison to fetch some things from his father s house still standing near by, was killed just as he was leaving the house to return, and his head was cut off and tossed about in view of the English, and then set upon a pole against the door of his father s house. All night they besieged the house fiercely, till about three o clock in the morning August 3d, when they collected hay and other combustibles, and attempted to set the house on fire at the corner. Under cover of their comrades muskets, a party promptly rushed out in the face of the enemies bullets, and put it out. Only two of these were wounded. At this time, at Capt. Wheeler s request, Ephraim Curtis made an attempt to get away through the lines to carry a message, but failed ; but near morning he tried again and succeeded by creep ing a long distance on his hands and knees to elude the Indians, and after a day and night, fainting with hunger and fatigue. 110 KING PHILIP S WAR. reached Marlborough on August 4th. But the news of the destruction of Brookfield had preceded him, carried by some people who were travelling towards Connecticut, and coming to Brookfield and seeing the burning houses and the killing of some cattle, turned back and spread the alarm at Marlborough, and a post was immediately sent after Major Willard who was to march that day from Lancaster to Groton. The messengers overtook him already upon the march, and upon receipt of the message he promptly turned his force of forty-six soldiers and five Indians under Capt. James Parker of Groton, towards Brookfield. In the mean time the Indians kept up their furious assault upon the garrison, trying by every art to fire the house through all the day and night, August 3d, which the English succeeded in pre venting, without injury, except to one Thomas Wilson, who was wounded while venturing into the yard outside to draw water. On August 4th, the enemy having received large reinforcements, proceeded to fortify the meeting-house near by, and also the barn belonging to the besieged house, to protect themselves from the watchful aim of the English muskets. They filled a cart " with flax, hay and candlewood, and set up planks fastened to the cart against our shot." This they designed to wheel against the house, under cover for the night. And later, they invented a machine-of-war, of a style unheard of before or since in war fare. It was a sort of trundling wheel-barrow fourteen rods long, a pole thrust through the heads of a barrel for a front wheel, and for a body long poles spliced together at the ends and laid upon short cross-poles, and lashed to the fore axle and truckle wheels placed under at intervals. They constructed two of these centi pede-like carriages and loaded the fronts with quantities of com bustibles, such as hay, flax and " candle wood." These were scarcely completed, however, when a heavy shower fell and wet down their combustibles, so that they would not readily burn, and in the mean time Major Willard and his force arrived, and so intent were the Indians about the machines, that his company, coming about an hour after dark, gained the yard of the gar risoned house before the enemy perceived them. There was a large body of Indians posted about two miles away, on the road by which the Major s company had come, and another party of over one hundred in a house nearer the garrison. The outpost had let the company pass unharmed, depending upon those nearer to strike the blow ; and these latter depending upon the others for an alarm, which either was not given, or else, in the excitement of building the machines, they did not hear, both missed the opportunity of attack. As soon as they saw their mistake they attacked the Major s party with fury, but without much avail, and all were soon safely within the house. The Indians seeing their devices defeated and the garrison reinforced, set fire to the barn and meeting-house, and in the early morning of August 5th, withdrew. SIEGE OF BROOKFIELD. Ill Such is Capt. Wheeler s account, in brief, of the famous encounter at the Quabaug Swamp, and the subsequent defence of Brookfield. And I have followed his account thus fully and at some length, because most of the published accounts that I have seen have either conflicted with his or have been otherwise misleading. As to the locality where the above surprise, and almost massacre, took place, there has been much interesting discussion within the last ten years. Two places seem to answer very closely the conditions of the account of Capt. Wheeler and the others, whose testimony has been used in the matter. One of these places is situated in the north-westerly part of New Brain- tree, where was an ancient Indian town called Meminimisset, afterwards Wenimisset. Dr. L. R. Paige, D.D., of Cambridge, advocates this location, and by an able and convincing array of facts and arguments, in the " New England Historical and Gene alogical Register " of October, 1884, leads to the conclusion that the scene of the tragic affair was just east of Wenimisset Meadows, near what is now known as Brookside Farm." The other location mentioned, is the ravine near the New Braintree and Brookfield line, some two and a half miles from Wickabaug Pond. This location is advocated by the Rev. J. H. Temple, late of Framingham, author of the History of North Brookfield, above mentioned. In his volume he brings forward equally strong and convincing proofs and arguments in favor of his location. Both these gentlemen are eminent authorities in antiquarian research ; both are equally earnest in their convictions ; both reason from the same evidences in general, viz. " Wheeler s Narrative," the testimony of the various reports of Ephraim Curtis, Mrs. Row- landson, the Indian guide, George Memicho, and others, but each interprets these witnesses as proving his own theory. I am free to say that reading the arguments of both again and again, I am unable to decide which is the most probable site of the encounter. But fortunately there has been new light shed upon the affair from an unexpected quarter. In 1893, an ancient map of a tract of country, covering this very territory, was brought to light from the unpublished manuscript treasures of the Massachusetts His torical Society, by Dr. Samuel A. Green, and published in fac simile in the " Proceedings " of the Society for that year. This map is entitled " A New Plan of Several Towns in the County of Worcester," and bears date of March 30, 1785. It was the work of General Rufus Putnam, at that time of Rutland, but formerly of New Braintree, a distinguished surveyor, a skil ful and painstaking artist, as this plan proves. The feature about this map of special interest to us here is the fact that it locates " Meminimisset," and the swamp to the east, and here is found the inscription, " Hutchinson & Troop Ambushed between Swamp & Hill." 112 KING PHILIP S WAR. This evidence would seem to confirm definitely the conclusions of Dr. Paige, and settle the location positively at Memininiisset, (Wenimisset). It certainly shows that in 1785, that spot was known as the scene of the struggle. By the courtesy of the Mass. Historical Society I am able to present this ancient plan in part to my readers. The Nipmuck tribes were alone concerned in this attack upon Brookfield; the Quabaugs, Wabbaquassets and Nashaways, being the chief. Philip left Pocasset Swamp July 31st, and with a small number of his warriors arrived at " Quabaug Old Fort " on Thursday, August 5th. By a letter from Major John Pynchon, of Springfield, to Gov. Winthrop of Connecticut, we learn that Philip was settled with his band on August 7th, not far from Meminimisset ; and that Philip s brother was there, and Mattaloos (Mattoonas) also with some two hundred men. George Memicho, the Indian captive taken at Brookfield, relates that Philip brought about forty men with him, and "many more women and chil dren." About thirty of his men had guns, the rest bows and arrows. On their return from Brookfield, the victorious Nip- mucks told Philip of their exploit, and he gave three of the Sagamores, Apequinash, Quanansit and Mattaump, about a peck of unstrung wampum apiece. Philip told the Indians that when he came from Pocasset he had about two hundred and fifty men in his company, besides women and children, including Weetamoo and her company ; but now they had gone by themselves, and some were killed. He also said that if Capt. Henchman had pursued him closely, he must have been taken with his whole company. After this Philip and his company seem to have dis appeared from this vicinity. But the affair at Brookfield had stirred up the Pocumptucks and other River Indians so that they were ripe for the scenes which ensued along those river towns, in which Philip apparently had small part. On August 7th fresh forces arrived from Boston, and all remained at the garrison till the 10th day, when Capts. Hutchin- son and Wheeier, with all of their company that were able to travel, came away and arrived at Marlborough on August 14th. Capt. Hutchinson died there of his wounds on the 19th, and was buried the next day. Capt. Wheeler and the remnants of his company remained there until the 21st, when they returned home to Concord. Of those who were engaged in this affair, the following re ceived credit for military service under Capt. Thomas Wheeler : Sept. 15, 1675. Samson Robin. 00 13 08 Joseph Robin. 00 13 08 Sept. 28 th Benjamin Graves. 02 16 04 Simon Davis. 03 08 16 John Buttrick. 03 01 06 Oct. 19 th George Howard. 01 08 06 John Hartwell. 01 11 06 WHEELER S FURTHER SERVICE. 113 John French, Corp. 07 04 00 JohnKittery(Kitteridg).03 08 06 George Farly. 00 14 00 James Paddisou. 01 14 08 John Bates. 01 14 03 Simon Howard. 01 10 00 Samuel Smedly. 00 14 00 Sidrach Hopgood. 00 10 00 November 30 th John Waldoe. 04 00 00 John Fisk. 01 14 09 Jan y 25, 1675-6. James Richardson. 02 02 00 Besides these credited above, there are several mentioned in the " Narrative " and elsewhere, who doubtless belonged to Cap tain Wheeler s troop Zechariah Phillips, Timothy Farlow and Edward Coleburn, killed at the ambuscade, and Henry Young killed at the garrison. These with young Thomas Wheeler, make up the number to twenty-one, besides the guides. In Rev. John Russell s list of men killed in Hampshire County, I find the name of James Hovey, killed at Brookfield, August 2. There is no other authority for the statement. The name occurs after that of Capt. Hutchinson, and it may be that he, like Capt. H., died of injuries received at the fight or garrison. Ephraim Cur tis was credited as directly in the service of the Council, <2 for his service. It will be noticed that neither Capt. Wheeler nor his son receive credit in the treasurer s account, but it is seen by two items in the Court Records first, October 13th, 1675, in answer to his petition setting forth his necessities, that he receives ten pounds, and again in October, 1676, for his own and his son s service, he is credited full wages for both from the time they left their own homes till they returned to them again, which was 28 in addition to the X10 granted him the year before, which in the Treasurer s Ledger, is put under the head of " Contingencies," and is in part remuneration for his losses and recognition of his eminent services. The twenty-eight pounds must have included subsequent service. He remained at home for some time, and probably in that time wrote out his " Narrative." Together with others of his troop, he celebrated the 21st of October, 1675, as a day of thanksgiving for their safe return from Brookfield. Before February 29th, as is evident from the credits following, he had been out again in service. What or where that service was I have not been able to find from any published reference. There was, however, much quiet, though efficient, service per formed in those times, that the chronicler passed over in giving account of the more stirring events ; and such service is often only revealed by these dim old pages of Hull s Journal, or the brief business or official letters preserved in our precious Archives. Such data may be helpful here. And first, the similarity of the amounts of credit would indicate that nearly all in this list were on the same service, and it would follow that the service was rendered before February 29th, 1676. The reference to " Groton Garrison " in the credit of a part of the men, seems to point to Groton and the neighboring towns as the place of service. And 114 KING PHILIP S WAR. again the letter to the Court from Groton, dated February 6th, 1675-6, and signed by James Parker, Thomas Wheeler and Henry Woodhouse (Woodis), respectfully suggests that the mainten ance of a scout of " forty men, troopers and dragoons," to scout between Groton, Lancaster and Marlboro , is unnecessary, the garrison at Lancaster being sufficient for such purpose. More over, that such method, considering the distance, renders the force unavailable in case of sudden surprise, and that such towns as Billerica and Chelmsford are weakened by the withdrawal of their troopers for this service, and that now in view of the sud den disappearance of the Weymesit Indians, the troopers from those towns " demand a release," etc. I find that many of those in the list were from Billerica and Chelmsford. The letter shows this scouting service to have been going on, and I think it is safe to conclude that most of these thirty-seven men were engaged in it under Capt. Wheeler and Lieut. Woodhouse. Feb y29 th 1675-6. Simon Davis (two credits ) 1 Nath. Hill. Jonathan Hill. Joseph Foster. John Waldo. Francis Dudly. Samuel Fletcher Sen r Samuel Fletcher Jun r Eleazer Brown. Cyprian Stevens. Benjamin Graves. John Bates. ^Stephen Goble. March 24 th Simon Willard. Thomas Tarball. Joseph Blood. June 24 th 1676 Henry Woodis, Lieut. Joses Buckman. Of the operations of the troops about Brookfield after the retreat of the Indians, some explanation will be given in the accounts of the various captains and their companies. In esti mating the number of inhabitants who were in the house and took part in the defence, we may consider the following data. The whole troop, including Capt. Wheeler and son, numbered twenty-two; Capt. Hutchinson, Ephraim Curtis and three Indians made it twenty-seven. At the fight five were killed and five wounded, one Indian guide captured, Henry Young killed 1 Under Wheeler at Groton garrison. ted under Capt. Wheeler : -6. David Batchelor. 01 12 10 )01 11 10 Simon Crosbe. 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 Daniel Maginnis. John Kitteridg. James Pattison. 00 06 00 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 Jonathan Hide. 01 12 10 01 12 10 Samuel Davis. 01 02 10 .01 04 05 John Brown. 01 12 10 .01 12 10 01 19 04 00 14 03 00 19 04 Joseph Hay ward. John Hay ward. Stephen Hosmer. John Gould. 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 Phinias Sprague. Henry Green. Joseph Winn. Sept. 23 d 1676. Abraham Jaque. Joseph Fitch. Samuel Dunton. 01 19 04 01 12 10 01 12 10 00 11 00 01 09 00 01 09 00 04 02 02 Jonathan Prescott. 00 14 03 01 12 10 BROOKFIELD ABANDONED. 115 at the house, and Curtis sent to Maryborough, leaving fourteen, presumably, fit for duty. There were some sixteen families gathered in the house, including fifty women and children. On August 3d Capt. Wheeler reports that only twenty-six, counting the men of the town and his soldiers, were capable of service. Hence we may infer that twelve of the inhabitants were actively engaged in the defence. Recurring now to the list of petitioners of October, 1673, published by Mr. Waite (New England Hist, and Genealogical Register, vol. xxxv. 336), and counting out Ayres, Pritchard, and Coy, killed, and Wilson wounded, we shall not be far out of the way in concluding that the others were joined with the troopers in making up the twenty-six, allowing for some changes by accessions to and removals from town between 1673 and 75. The reported numbers of four or five hundred Indians present, and eighty killed, will bear liberal reduction, though the English carbines were bravely effective. The following fragment may be of interest here as showing the presence of the celebrated pirate here just after the assault was over. It is taken from the Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 7. Boston, October y e 13, 1675. To the honored Governor & Councell of the Massathusets Colony in New England. These are to signyfie that Cornellius [s/c] Consort the Dutchman was uppon the Contryes Servis Att quabauge and by the Councle of Warre there was sent out Capt. of the for lorne And Afterward marched to Grotton & Chemsfort According to my best Advice continued in the Countryes Servis six weekes Cornellius being Reddy to depart the Country & myself being here att boston the Major Willard being Absent I granted this ticket. THOMAS WHELLER, Capt. This was the famous Cornelius Anderson. In the great trial of the pirates he was constantly referred to as Cornelius Consort, i. e. Consort of Capt. Roderigo, the chief of the pirates. The name " Consort " thus became his familiar cognomen among the people and soldiers with whom he was very popular. I cannot tell on what occasion he led the "forlorne," but it was after Capt. Mosely came, Aug. llth or 12th, and before the 15th when he left. The Council of War was held after Capt. Wheeler had gone, but now, Oct. 13th, being in Boston, Major Willard absent at Groton, Mosely at Hatfield, Lathrop and Beers both slain, it devolved upon him to " grant the ticket." BROOKFIELD AFTEK THE ATTACK. Capt. Wheeler relates that soon after his own return from Brookfield, " the inhabitants of the town also, men, women, and children, removed safely with what they had left, to several 116 KING PHILIP S WAR. places, either where they had lived before their planting or settling down there, or where they had relations to receive and entertain them," and " the Honored Major Willard stayed several weeks after our coming away." A small garrison was undoubtedly maintained at the fortified house some time after the withdrawal of the inhabitants, prob ably up to the 12th of October, and it is likely that widow Susannah Ayres remained during that time, as is indicated by her petition and account presented the Court in October, 1677, which charges supples to soldiers under Ephraim Curtis, Major Willard and Capt. Poole ; but some time before November 16th the place was vacant, for the Council on that date instructs Capt. Appleton in his march homeward from Connecticut River, if he comes by way of Quaboag, to drive down some of the cattle and swine which they have heard have gathered about the house, as a relief to the " poore people that are concerned therein." There is much material preserved in the Mass. Archives bearing upon this point of the withdrawal of the garrison from Brookfield, in numerous letters and orders of the Council to various officers, all giving evidence of the complete desertion of the town about Oct. 12th. See especially, correspondence with Capt., -Apple ton and Lieut. John Ruddock, etc. ; also petition of John Ayres s sons, Mass. Arch. vol. 10. The town was doubtless wholly vacated before the middle of October, and remained so, except for the frequent passage of the troops to and from the west, up to the last of February following. On the 21st of that month the Council ordered " Carpenters tooles for six men, nayles of all sorts with hooks and hinges for doors and locks and of such sort as the chief carpenter shall appoint, to build a quarter at Quabaog ; " and on the 25th the committee was ordered to procure either John Brewer of Sud- bury, or John Coolidge of Watertown to go up with the army and build a house or houses for lodging and shelter of provisions, etc. A small garrison was established there under Serg t William Ingraham, who writes the Council on March 21st for relief, " men few and discouraged, need ammunition," etc. In answer the Council sent up Capt. Nathaniel Graves of Charlestown with men and horses laden with supplies, as will be seen by the fol lowing order from Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 173 : Att a Council held at Boston, 22. March 1675-6 It is ordered that Capt. Nathaniel Graves of Charlestown shall be the Comander of the Garrison at Brookfield & all Inferiour officers arid Souldjers are requested to be obedjent to him : As the said Capt. Graves is ordered to take ye Comand of twenty troopers and thirty horses & fiveteen men besides w th the Carriage horses to be Loaden w th provision & Ammunition to be conveyed to the Garrison at Brookfield and after the carriages are Lodged there he then send backe the Troopers & Carriage horses, dismissing them to BROOKFIELD REGARRISONED. 117 theire several homes, And that W m Ingram now Comander of the Garrison at Brookfield is dismissed after Capt Graves comes there who is to returne with the Troopers & Carriages. It is further ordered that Major Savage order ten Souldiers more to strengthen the Garrison at Brookfield as soon as he Can Conveniently. And the said Capt. Graves is ordered with all Convenient dispatch to march up to Brook- field w th the sayd Carriages : dated in Boston as above. pr. EDW D RAWSON, Secret y. "Warrants issued forth to the Constables. To Charlestowne for Carriage horses, 4 and 2 men besides a horse for Capt Graves. " Cambridge, Car. nor. 4 and 2 men "Watertown, " " 6 " 3 " " Sudbury, " " 6 " 3 " "Wooburne " " 6 " 3 " To Roxbury , Car. hor. 4 and 2 men 30 15 To Capt. Prentice for 7 Troopers. To the Constable of Marlborough for 6 Troopers. To Capt. Davis for 6 Troopers. The following letter is of interest both for the matter in hand and to show that garrison life in idleness is much the same in every age. From Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 237. Honoured Governer & Sir we are all In Indifferent helth we dayly are goeing forth but cannot see any Indians : our provissions dus spend apace And if you Intend to Continue y 8 place we must have more prouissions y l wee have may Last about 8 or 10 days : for my owne partt I Can be Content w th Less y n many of y r men heare : I have eatten but Littell of your pro vissions : I expect A release by y e next y l Cum up : for I am not fit for y 9 Employ being out of my way & know there are many men more fit than I for y 8 Busines I do not Apprehend any danger to Ly heare for I Beleave the Indians will nott Cum to our Garreson all my feare is of our men y* go Abroad & are not so Carefull as they shud be we have had no damage yet y 1 makes us Secure if you doe Continue y e men heare they will wantt showes & Shurtts And Linin drawers and Tobacco & A glace to Keap watch w th all our discontent Arises from y now afore it was want of meate now we have enough heare are many would not care if they did stay there time out. they ow there masters here is noething to doe but up to play And down to sleepe if y c Country Can Afoard to maynteyn them so : I am Content rather to bare my partt of y e Charge then to play heare where I Can do no good w ht showes and other things we had was sent to hadly & I have a Resayte for them from y c Commissarys w ch I hoap w 11 discharge mee w ch is all y offers att present from Sir, your Seruant In what I am abell & understand. 28 th Aparell 1676 NATHANIEL GRAVES. On May 5th Serg t Ephraim Savage was chosen to go up to re lieve Capt. Graves with new supplies, and to send home those that were sick or greatly needed at home, and to take command 118 KING PHILIP S WAR. of the garrison, thirty of the men at least to remain. Serg t Savage was excused from the service on account of sickness, and Thomas Walker, " the brickmaker," was chosen in his stead. It would seem, however, that his health improved, for he went with a lieutenant s commission and wages, and the credit below shows him to have served, and not Walker. Of the subsequent history of the garrison there is no definite account, but frequent refer ences to it as a base of supplies, etc., show it to have been main tained for some time. The following names are credited with military service at the garrison at Brookfield and "Quabaug." June 24, 1676. John Ray man. James Kelling. Ezekiel Levitt. John Norton. John Mansell. July 24, 1676. Joseph Hide. Isaac Perkins. Nicholas Rawlins. George Norton. Benjamin Dunnage. John Artsell. Thomas Scott. Thomas Cooper. Thomas Philips. Joseph Garfell. Benjamin Pickerin. John Glide. Benjamin Bucknall. Ephraim Savage, Lt. Christopher Cole. Charles Blinco. John Mansell. 01 00 00 05 01 00 01 04 00 01 09 00 01 18 00 01 00 06 01 01 04 00 07 00 00 06 04 01 08 03 01 08 00 01 04 00 05 00 00 05 03 06 00 17 00 04 10 00 05 08 00 04 15 00 04 07 09 03 02 06 03 13 00 01 10 00 Nathaniel Partridg. 05 08 00 John Sargent. 03 02 06 Charles Duckworth. 03 15 00 John Cromwell. 03 15 03 John Norton. 01 12 06 William Bodkin. 04 12 06 John Jeffery. 04 19 04 Joseph Swady. 04 12 06 Ebenezer Engellsbee. 04 12 06 Henry Pellington. 05 07 00 John Algar. 03 02 06 Thomas Stacie. 01 12 06 Sylvester Haies. 04 10 00 John Simple. 03 02 06 August 24 th 1676 John Cromwell. 02 09 06 Charles Duckworth. 02 09 06 Edward Blaucher. 05 10 00 David Crouch. 02 06 02 David Jones. 07 06 06 Philip Sandy. 05 08 00 Thomas Phillips. 00 18 00 John Cutler. 05 09 08 There is no reliable evidence that the town of Brookfield was resettled before 1686 or 7. Many families were there before 1693, and a garrison house had been built, when, on July 27th of that year, a band of twenty-six Canadian Indians attacked the town and killed and captured several of its inhabitants. VI. MAJOR SIMON WILLARD AND HIS MEN. OF all the names that stand upon the pages of New England history, none are more honored than that of Major Simon Willard. His biography has been written in the " Willard Memoir," and therefore only a brief outline will be necessary here. He was born at Horsmonden, County of Kent, England, baptized April 7, 1605. He was the son of Richard and his second wife Margery. Simon married in England Mary Sharpe, of Horsmonden, who bore him before leaving England (probably) three children, and six in New England. He married for a second wife Elizabeth Dunster, who died six months after her marriage ; and a third wife, Mary Dunster, who bore him eight children, between the years 1649 and 1669. Simon Willard ar rived in Boston in May, 1634, and settled soon after at Cam bridge. He was an enterprising merchant, and dealt extensively in furs with the various Indian tribes, and was the " chief e in strument in settling the towne " of Concord, whither he removed at its first settlement in 1635-6, and remained for many years a principal inhabitant of that town. On the organization of the town he was chosen to the office of clerk, which he held by annual election for nineteen years. It is said upon respectable authority that he had held the rank of captain before leaving England, and in Johnson s " Wonder Working Providences " he is referred to as "Captain Simon Willard being a Kentish Soldier." In 1637 he was commissioned as the Lieutenant-Commandant of the first military company in Concord. At the first election, December, 1636, he was chosen the town s representative to the General Court, and was reflected and served constantly in that office till 1654, except three years. In that year he was reflected, but was called to other more pressing duties ; and afterwards to his death was Assistant of the Colony. In 1641 he was appointed super intendent of the company formed in the colony for promoting trade in furs with the Indians, and held thereafter many other positions of trust, either by the election of freemen or the appoint ment of: the Court, too many to admit of separate mention here. In 1646 he was chosen Captain of the military company which, as Sergeant and Lieutenant, he had commanded from its organiza- 120 KING PHILIP S WAK. / tion. For many years he was a celebrated surveyor, and in 1652 was appointed on the commission sent to establish the northern bound of Massachusetts, at the head of Merrimac River, and the letters S W upon the famous Bound-Rock (discovered many years ago near Lake Winnepesaukee) were doubtless his initials, cut at that time. In 1653 he was chosen Serjeant-Major, the highest military officer of Middlesex County. In October, 1654, Major Willard was appointed commander-in- chief of the military expedition against Ninigret, Sachem of the Nyanticks, as told heretofore, in the Introductory Chapter, p. 22. In the settlement of the town of Lancaster Major Willard had been of great service to the inhabitants, and their appreciation was shown when, in 1658, the selectmen wrote him an earnest invitation to come and settle among them, offering a generous share in their lands as inducement. This invitation he accepted, sold his large estate in Concord, and removed to Lancaster, prob ably in 1659, and thence to a large farm he had acquired in Groton, about 1671, at a place called Nonacoicus. At the opening of " Philip s War," Major Willard, as chief military officer of Middlesex County, was in a station of great responsibility, and was very active in the organization of the colonial forces. His first actual participation in that war was in the defence of Brookfield, the particulars of which have been noted. We must admire this grand old man of seventy, mount ing to the saddle at the call of the Court, and riding forth at the head of a frontier force for the protection of their towns. On August 4th he marched out from Lancaster with Capt. Parker and his company of forty-six men, "to look after some Indians to the westward of Lancaster and Groton," having five friendly Indians along as scouts, and, receiving the message of the dis tressed garrison at Brookfield, promptly hastened thither to their relief, which he accomplished, as we have seen in a former chapter. , Upon the alarm of the disaster at Brookfield, a considerable force soon gathered there from various quarters. Two companies were sent up by the Council at Boston, under Captains Thomas Lathrop of Beverly and Richard Beers of Watertown, and arrived at Brookfield on the 7th. Capt. Mosely, also, who was at Mendon with sixty dragoons, marched with that force, and most of Capt. Henchman s company, and arrived at Brookfield probably about August. From Springfield came a Connecticut company of forty dragoons under Capt. Thomas Watts, of Hart ford, with twenty-seven dragoons and ten Springfield Indians under Lieut. Thomas Cooper, of Springfield. These forces for several weeks scouted the surrounding country under Major Willard; the details of which service belong properly to the accounts of the several Captains. In addition to these were forty " River Indians " from the vicinity of Hartford, arid thirty of Uncas s Indians under his son Joshua, who scouted with the SOLDIERS CREDITED UNDER MAJOR WILLARD. 121 other forces. The Nipmucks could not be found, and it was afterward learned from the Indian guide, George Memecho, cap tured by the Nipmucks in Wheeler s fight, that on their retreat from Brookfield on August 5th, Philip, with about forty warriors and many more women and children, had met them in a swamp six miles beyond the battle ground, and by presents to their Sachems and otherwise had engaged them further in his interest ; and all, probably, hastened away towards Northfield and joined the Pocomptucks, and thence began to threaten the plantations on the Connecticut River. After several days diligent search ing, on August 16th, Captain Lathrop s and Beers s companies, the latter reinforced by twenty-six men from Capt. Mosely, together with most of the Connecticut, Springfield and Indian forces, inarched towards Hadley and the neighboring towns, while Mosely went towards Lancaster and Chelmsford. Major Willard remained for several weeks at the garrison. Mr. Hub- bard and Capt. Wheeler make this statement, and further relate that he soon after went up to Hadley on the service of the county. I think the visit to Hadley was after August 24th, as on that date I find a letter from Secretary Rawson to him, en closing one to Major Pynchon, and advising him to ride up to Springfield and visit Major Pynchon " for the encouragement of him and his people." The writer of the "Willard Memoir" states that he was in command of the forces about Hadley for some time in the absence of Major Pynchon, but I have been unable to find any confirmation of this, unless it may be the inference drawn from Hubbard, who states that when Major Willard " returned back to his own place to order the affairs of his own regiment, much needing his Presence," he left "the Forces about Hadley under the Command of the Major of that Regiment." The letter above contained directions about the disposal of his forces, etc., which would naturally take several weeks to accomplish, and although the precise date of Major Willard s return from Brookfield is not given, some inference may be drawn from circumstances noted further on. Following is the list of those credited with service under Major Willard, from August 7th to January 25th, 1675: August 7 th , 1675 Richard Keatts. 01 02 00 Sept 17 Thomas Hincher. 04 00 00 Sept 21 st Jonathan Prescott. 00 14 00 John Divall. 00 11 00 Sept 28 th James Parker, Capt. James Knap, Serg*. James Fisk. 01 02 00 03 00 00 00 16 09 Matthias Farnsworth. John Tarball. Lot Johnson. Onesiphorus Stanley. Josiah Parker. Samuel Davis. James Nutting. October 5 th Paul Fletcher. Edward Foster. John Barrett. 00 12 02 03 06 00 02 04 06 02 04 06 11 11 00 00 00 00 00 11 00 02 02 02 10 00 10 00 10 00 122 KIKG PHILIP S WAR. Gershom Procter. 02 10 00 Ephraim Hildred. 02 07 00 Jonathan Chrisp. 01 04 06 John Heale. 04 15 06 John Hawes. 04 00 00 James Smedly. 04 00 00 Thomas Tally. 04 00 00 Josiah Wheeler. 02 17 00 October 19 th 1675 Thomas Rogers. 02 07 04 John Shead. 02 02 04 Benjamin Simmons. 03 06 08 Simon Willard, Major. 30 00 00 Humphrey Jones alias Johnson. 01 18 06 Josiah White. 00 12 00 Daniel Gaines. 00 12 00 Ephraim Sawyer. 00 12 00 Daniel Adams. 00 08 00 Thomas Beamon. 00 08 00 Simon Willard. 1 03 00 00 Samuel Cleaveland. 03 06 04 John Batemau. 03 15 00 John Jefts (or Jeffers). 02 03 04 Anthony Hancock. 01 01 06 Nov. 20 th . John Brookes. 02 04 06 Simon Willard, Major. 10 00 00 John Bateman. 03 00 00 Paul Fletcher. 02 01 00 John Coddington. 03 00 00 John Gleason. 02 03 00 Daniel Liucolne. 01 05 08 William Wade. 02 03 00 William Kerby. 00 12 00 Consider Atherton. 00 15 00 Nov. 30 th John Brookes. 00 11 04 Edward Wright. 00 10 00 Abraham Cousens. 01 05 02 Dec. 20 JohnSevery. 00 10 02 January 25. 1675-6 Philip Read, Doctor. 09 07 04 John Smith. 02 06 04 The foregoing list of credits I presume to embrace the company of Capt. Parker, who marched with Major Willard to the relief of Brookfield on August 4th. I judge that Capt. Parker, with some sixteen or more of these men, returned to Groton before August 16th, as on that date Capt. Mosely had sent twelve men to Groton to help secure the town ; and Capt. Parker writes the Council on August 25th about their affairs, asking for arms and ammuni tion, as they are expecting an attack upon the town. Those that went back with him were very likely Groton men, and it is prob able are representedby the smaller credits. Capt. Parker acknowl edges the receipt of twenty men from Capt. Mosely and Major Willard, and these were, doubtless, in addition to the number of his own men that returned with him. The rest of his company remained with Major Willard, as may be shown by their larger credits. From a paper which was presented to the Court after Major Willard s death, in statement of his unpaid services and expenses for the government, it appears that From the 20 th of September (1675) till the 18 th of April (1676), the Major was employed about the country business, Settling of Garrisons in towns, and settling of Indians at Concord and Chelmsford, and other business, etc. The paper is given in full in the " Willard Memoir," and shows 1 The Major s son. His horse was killed at Brookfield, for which the Court allowed 3 in October, 1676. MAJOR WILLARD STRENGTHENS MIDDLESEX TOWNS. 123 that this was a time of constant anxiety and activity in those towns, and that the Major s house at Nonacoicus (in the town of Groton, now within the town of Ayer) was a place of frequent rendezvous for the troops passing hither and thither, and of en tertainment to those who come to the Major on the country s business. On September 8th the Council issued an order to Cornet Thomas Brattle and Lieut. Thomas Henchman to march to Chelmsford with fifty men, collected, thirty from Norfolk and twenty from Middlesex Counties, and distribute them in the gar risons in the frontier towns of Groton, Lancaster and Dunstable. This order was probably in answer to Capt. Parker s appeal of August 25th. The men were to be left under the command of the chief officers in each town ; and as Major Willard is not referred to at all, it would seem probable that he had not yet returned from Brookfield ; but some time before September 20th he was at home ; and when Capt. Henchman was sent, about that date, to organize an expedition to Pennacook with orders to with draw eighty men from the several garrisons before mentioned, he was instructed to meet Major Willard at his home, and consult with him and the chief officers of the several garrisons as to the expedition. This meeting took place on September 25th, and on the same day Major Willard, together with officers Adams, Parker and Kidder, addressed a remonstrance to the Council against the withdrawal of so many of their soldiers. Capt. Henchman re ports the same meeting in his letter of Sept. 27th. The Council, for various reasons, concurred with the Major, and the expedi tion was abandoned. For the succeeding months Major Willard was busily engaged in ordering the defences of the Middlesex frontier towns and settling the various bodies of friendly Indians. Garrisons were maintained at Lancaster, Chelmsford, Groton and Dunstable, and the entire available force of the county was kept in a "posture of war." During the time that the army of the colony was absent at Narraganset, there is evidence from frequent letters, petitions, etc., from these frontier towns, that the people felt comparatively secure ; but when Canonchet, after the Narraganset fight, fleeing with his surviving warriors, came into the vicinity, their fears were newly aroused, especially when, about February 6th, the army abandoned the pursuit, leaving the Indians in the woods about Brookfield, and, returning to Boston, were disbanded. The Council, not insensible to the danger which thus threatened these towns, immediately issued orders to Major Willard to raise a large force of dragoons to scout in front of the towns of Groton, Lancaster, etc., to Marlborough. This plan met with immediate remonstrance from the towns, and appeals were at once made to the Council against the measure, as it withdrew many from the garrisons to a great distance for days together, leaving them 124 KING PHILIP S WAR. exposed to sudden incursions from the prowling and watchful enemy. At this time Major Willard was so busy ordering the defences of the towns that he was unable to take his seat in the Council, and sent them a letter of explanation. This letter is not found in the archives, but the answer of the Council is as follows, giv ing some idea of the contents : Sir. The Council received your letter and are sorry for your excuse for not coming to the Council by reason of the State of Lancas ter, which we desire you to endeavor to the utmost of your power to relieve and succour. We are useing our best endeavours to prepare more forces to send to distress the enemy. You shall hear more from us speedily, and in the interim we desire you to be in readiness if you should have a full command over the forces to be sent forth from the Colony. E R Secy 11 Feb. 1675. The Council s letter was written the day after the attack upon Lancaster, of which evidently they had not heard. Major Willard was probably at this time at Groton or Chelmsford, where an attack was daily expected, doing all in his power with the small force at his command to protect these towns from surprisal. After the attack upon Lancaster, a large party of the Indians swept down towards Plymouth Colony, taking Medfield on the way, February 21st, and for the time distracting attention from the main body, which, as soon became evident, were still in the vicinity of "Wachusett Hills." On February 19th Major Willard and Capt. Parker, in behalf of the people of Groton, sent an earnest appeal to the Council for help and advice. On the 21st the Major was present at the sitting of the Court at Boston, and remained during the session. He was at Cambridge on March 4th, and certainly did not return to Groton till after March 7th, as on that day he was at the Court of Assistants. It was probably by his endeavors that a levy was ordered to be made on Norfolk and Essex Counties (forty-eight from Essex and forty from Norfolk). These forces were hastily collected, and under the stress of the news of the attack upon Groton were placed under the command of Capt. Joseph Cook, of Cambridge, and ordered to report to Major Willard at Groton at once. This action was taken by Major Gookin and Thomas Danforth, two members of the Council living at Cambridge, and was approved by the Council at their next meeting, March 16th. On March 9th the Indians again appeared at Groton, doing some mischief, and again on the 13th in full force, and destroyed all the houses in town except the garrison houses, and one even of these, from which, however, the people had escaped. I think that Major Willard marched up from Watertown with Capt. Cook s force on the 12th or 13th, and arrived at Groton on the 14th, as the Indians retired on that day, apparently aware of the INDIANS ASSAULT GROTON. 125 approaching force. The people got safely within their garrisons before the attack, and but one man, probably John Nutting, was killed. The town was abandoned within a few days, and the inhabitants removed to the towns nearer the coast. Major Wil- lard, with his family, removed to Charlestown. It is likely that he had removed his family some time before the destruction of his house, on the 13th, as that stood in an exposed position, and his son Samuel Willard, the minister of Groton, had another of the garrisoned houses. The Indians were greatly elated at their success at Groton, and threatened to attack and destroy all the towns, including even Boston, and Major Willard s orders were, after relieving Groton, to scout back and forth to protect the neighboring towns, espe cially Chelmsford and Marlborough. The business of the removal of the people of Groton was committed to Capt. Joseph Sill, of Cambridge, who went up with troops and some sixty carts for that purpose. This design was successfully carried out, although the force guarding the long line of carts was so small, and an ambush was laid and an attack made upon the advance from a very advantageous position. Two of the " vaunt Carriers " were mortally wounded, but the English were promptly drawn up for battle, and after a few shots the enemy retired before their well- aimed volleys. In the mean time Major Willard, and his Essex and Norfolk men, were not idle, as will be seen by the following account, prepared by him, of his movements from March 21st to the 29th. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 186. A short narrative of what I have attended unto by the Councill of late, since I went to relieve Groatton. The 21:1: 75-76, I went to Concord, and divided the troope committed unto me from Essex & Norfolke into three pts one to garde the carte, pressed from Sudbury, one pt for y c carte pressed from concord, both to Lancaster, one pt for y e carte that went from Charlestowne & Wattertowne that went vol- intiers or wear hiered when I had sent them to their severall places I came downe being the 22 : 1 : 75-6 : & went to concord the 25 : 1 : 75, when I came there & inquired how it was with Lancaster the answer was they weare in distresse, I p r sently sent 40 horse thither to fetch awaye corne, and I went that night to Chellmsfoord to sc how it was with them, they complayned, Billerikye Bridge, stood in great need of beinge fortified, I ordered that to be don, allso they told me, that the Indians made two great rafte of board & rayles, that they had gott, that laye at the other syd of the river, I ordered 20 souldiers to go over & take them, & towe them downe the River, or p r serve them as they se cause, the 27 of this instant I went from Chellmsford to con cord agayne when I came there, the troopers that I sent to Lancaster last had brought away all the people there, but had left about 80 bushells of wheat & Indian corne, yesterday I sent : 40 : horses or more to fetch it away, & came down from concord, this day I ex pect they will be at concord, Some of the troope I relesed when this last worke was don, the other I left order to scout abroad uutill they heare from nie agayne, I thought it not meet to relese men, when we 126 KING PHILIP S WAK. stand in need of men, my desire is to know what I shall do herin in, concord & chelmsford look every day to be fired, and wold have more men but know not how to keepe them, nor paye them, your humble servant. .SIMON WILLAKD 29:1:76. The troops that went up from Norfolk and Essex were credited under their special officers, and will there appear. The following are those who receive credit under Major Willard, and are those probably who were employed in scouting with him in the early part of the winter. CREDITED UNDER MAJOR WILLARD. February 29 th Thomas Wheeler 02 16 08 June 24 th Edward Young. 01 04 00 July 24 th John Bush 01 04 00 Isaac Fellows. 01 05 06 Samuel Ingolls. 01 10 10 Samuel Bishop. 01 10 00 August 24 th William Green. 00 08 06 Phinias Sprague 00 07 00 John Green 00 07 00 John Dexter. Samuel Green. Joseph Wilson. John Lind. Thomas Newell. John Sprague. Thomas Munge. Peter Towne. Thomas Wheeler, jr. William Price, jr. September 23 d Francis Whitmore. Daniel Gowen. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 01 07 00 07 00 07 00 07 00 07 00 07 00 07 00 07 06 00 00 07 04 10 00 17 04 On March 29th Major Willard was in his seat at the Court of Assistants, and his family was then living at Charlestown. He was also at the session of the County Court at Cambridge at its session beginning April 4th. On the llth he was reflected as Assistant, having the highest number of votes cast for any magis trate except the governor and deputy governor. He was con stantly engaged in his public duties until April 18th, when he retired to his home and was struck down it is thought by an "epidemical cold" which was then raging, and on April 24th " died in his bed in peace, though God had honoured him with several signal victories over our enemies in war," says a con temporary historian. No man was ever more fully or more de servedly honored in life and death than Major Willard. His funeral at Charlestown on April 27th was an occasion of great pomp for that time, six military companies parading under com mand of Capt. Henchman ; and his death created profound sorrow far and wide. There are numerous references to his death and funeral in the literature, records and MS. journals of that day. His family was reimbursed for his great expense and services, in 1677 ; and again in 1681 a grant of land of one thousand acres was set aside for his six youngest children when they should come of age. He left a numerous posterity, many of whom have held honor able positions in succeeding generations. His widow married Deacon Joseph Noyes of Sudbury, July 14, 1680, and died in that town, December, 1715. VII. CAPT. RICHARD BEERS, CAPT. THOMAS LATHROP, AND THEIR COMPANIES. RICHARD BEERS was admitted freeman at Watertown, March 9, 1637, was granted a license to "keep an ordinary" in Watertown in 1654, and continued that business during his life. He was representative to the General Court thirteen years, and selectman of Watertown thirty-one years, holding both offices at the time of his marching to Brookfield, August 6th, 1675. Before leaving home on that day he made a nuncupatory will, proved Oct. 5, 1675. He left a widow Elizabeth, and their chil dren were Sarah, 1st, died before Oct. 10, 1639 ; Sarah, 2d (born probably about 1641) ; Mar}% born March 10, 1643 ; Eliezur administered jointly with Capt. Richard s widow Elizabeth upon his estate in 1682, married, April 21, 1690, widow Susanna (Har rington) Cutting, and died without issue, Dec. 5, 1701 ; Judith, born March 26, 1646 ; Jabez, born August 4, 1651 ; Elnathan, married about 1681 Sarah Tainter ; Elizabeth ; Richard, born Oct. 22, 1659 ; and Abigail, born April, 1662. From Hull s Journal I find that Eliezur served under Capt. Cutler in 1676. Elnathan was sergeant in his father s company in the west, and afterwards served under Capt. Sill. Capt. Beers s age was probably about 63. A little light may be thrown upon the history of Capt. Beers by the following petition in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, page 163 : To the Governour, etc., etc. Humble Petition of Rich d Beeres of Watertown. Whereas your petitioner hath bin an Inhabitant of this jurisdiction ever since the first beginning thereof & according to his weake abillities served the same not only in times of peace But allsoe w th his person in pequod warr in two severall designes when the Lord delivered them into our hands as allsoe uppon his returne such a weaknesse fell uppon his boddy that for Eaight years Space lie was disinabled to labor for his ffamyly Spending a (grat) ? part of that little hee had uppon Phesitions & having hitherto had not any land of the Country & of the Towne but one Acre and a halfe besides that he hath purchased, Humbly desires this Honoured Court to Grant him Such a parcell of land (where he 128 KING PHILIP S WAR. can find it in this wilderness) as shall seem meet to this Honoured Courte, and the rather Seeing he hath many children to share in the Same which shall further ingage him for the future. As in duty hee is bound to Serve & Honor Y r in the Lord. October 24, 1665. It will be noted that in the first campaign to Mount Hope the troops were drawn almost wholly from the vicinity of Boston, Suf folk and Middlesex counties. In the latter part of July a levy had been made in Essex, and when on August 4th or 5th the news of the disaster at Brookfield came to the Council, the company from Salem and vicinity was summoned and sent up to the relief of the distressed garrison, under the command of Capt. Lathrop, and another company from Watertown under Capt. Beers. Accord ing to Capt. Wheeler, these troops arrived at Brookfield on Satur day afternoon, August 7th, and it is probable that the troops sent up from Hartford and Springfield arrived later, perhaps the same evening. It is possible that it was on Monday, 9th, or Tuesday, that the troops in force marched out to " Meminimisset, where Capt. Hutchinson and Capt. Wheeler were assaulted," and having found no signs of Indians in the vicinity, the company from Spring field left the others and marched northward and around to Springfield again, while the rest returned to Brookfield. The English were sorely puzzled as to the whereabouts of the Indians, and continued scouting for several days in the vicinity of Brook- field, probably as far as Hadley, knowing that Philip had now joined the Nipmucks, and fearing that the main body of the Indians were at no great distance. Gardiner s bill, given below, indicates Lathrop s presence at Hadley, August 12, but within two days he was again at Brookfield. There, being recruited by the large force that came up with Capt. Mosely from Mendon, an advance in force was resolved upon, and on Aug. 15th, Capts. Lathrop and Beers with their companies marched by way of Meminimisset to Springfield. Capt. Mosely with his troops accompanied them as far as the swamp, the scene of Wheeler s fight, where he sep arated from them and marched away towards Chelmsford and Lancaster, leaving twenty-six of his men to recruit the company of Capt. Beers. The troops under Capts. Lathrop and Beers, joined at Springfield by the forces under Capt. Watts, together with the Connecticut Indians, spent several days exploring the country up along Swift River and the Connecticut, without find ing the Indians, and on Aug. 22d, as we learn from Major Pyn- chon s letter to the Connecticut Council, the Massachusetts troops had returned to Brookfield again, and Capt. Watts with his forces was at Hadley. On August 23d Lathrop and Beers had again joined Watts at Hadley, and at a council of war held on that day it was resolved to disarm the Hadley Indians who had gathered at their fort on LATHEOP AND BEERS AT WEQUAMPS. 129 the west side of the river, about half-way between Hatfield and Northampton. Preparations were. made for carrying out this design on the 24th. Messengers were despatched to Northamp ton to secure the cooperation of the force there, which was to move as near to the Indian fort as possible, unperceived, while Capts. Lathrop and Beers crossed the river to Hatfield, to approach the fort from that side. In the meantime peaceful demands had been made upon the Indians to deliver up their arms, and one of their sachems had come before the council to present their objections ; and it is probable that many of their old men and others of their tribe were in favor of submission, but were overruled, and before the English had completed their prep arations it was found that the Indians had all escaped, having killed one old sachem, who, it is said, opposed the flight and refused to join it. The Indians fled on the night of the 24th, and on the morning of the 25th, Capts. Lathrop and Beers, with one hundred men, pursued them, coining upon them unexpectedly " at a place called Sugar-Loaf Hill," "about ten miles above Hatfield," according to Mr. Hubbard ; " at a swamp beyond Hatfield," says Mr. Russell of Hadley, writing soon after. " The place is now unknown," says the late eminent historian of Hadley, Mr. Judd ; while Messrs. Temple and Sheldon, the careful historians of Northfield, locate the scene " in a swamp just south of Mt. Wequamps, in the present town of Whately." Here an engagement ensued, which is most reliably described perhaps by the following extract from a letter written by Rev. Solomon Stoddard of Northampton, on Sept. 15th, 1675, to Rev. Increase Mather of Boston : They (the English) intended to parley with the Indians, but on a sudden the Indians let fly about forty guns at them, and were soon answered with a volley from our men ; about forty ran down into the swamp after them, poured in shot among them, made them throw down much of their baggage, and after a while our men, after the Indian manner, got behind trees and watched their opportunities to make shots at them. The fight continued about three hours ; we lost six men upon the ground, though one was shot in the back by our own men ; a seventh died of his wound coming home, and two died the next night, nine in all, of nine several towns, every one of these towns lost a man. Of the Indians, as we hear since by a squaw that was taken, and by three children that came to our town from them the day after, there were slain twenty-six. . . . From Mr. Russell s " List of the men slain in the County of Hampshire," Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 33, from another list in vol. 67, p. 254, and from various other sources, it is judged that the following is a correct account of the killed at this fight of August 25th: 130 KIXG PHILIP S WAR. Samuel Mason of Northampton. James Levins of Roxbury? Azariah Dickinson of Hadley. Richard Fellows of Hatfield. *John Plumer of Newbury. *Mark Pitman of Marblehead. * Joseph Person of Lynn. *Matthew Scales of Rowley. William Cluffe of Charlestown. Edward Jackson of Cambridge (perhaps). [* Were of Capt. Lathrop s company.] After this skirmish the Indians made good their escape and probably joined the Pocomtuck tribe then living near Deerfield river. The English marched back to Hatfield, and thence crossed to "Hadley, where other troops from Connecticut and from the East were gathering, expecting a general attack from the main body of the Indians, now believed to be concentrated at Paquoag (Athol). Nothing, however, was done by the Indians until Sept. 1st, when the Pocomtucks, now joined by the Nor- wottucks (or Hadley Indians), fell upon Deerfield, where but a small garrison was stationed, burned most of the houses, and killed one of the garrison, James Eggleston, of Windsor, Conn., of Capt. Watts s Company. In Mr. Russell s list the name of Nathaniel Cornberry is given also as slain at Deerfield, but it was probably later, perhaps on the 12th, when Mr. Stoddard relates another assault upon some of the people going to meeting, of whom one was taken alive by the Indians. Hadley was at this time the headquarters of the English, and probably Capts. Lathrop and Beers, with their companies, were there on September 1st. It is certain that they were there on the 2d, and were organizing a force to bring off the garrison at Northfield. But on that day (Thursday, Sept. 2d), while this expedition was in preparation, and the Northfield people and the garrison soldiers were abroad in the fields at work, a large body of Indians suddenly fell upon that town, killed many of the people as they fled from their homes and fields towards the garrison, burned all their exposed houses and destroyed cattle and crops. There were sixteen families in the town. The English killed at this time, according to Russell s list, were eight : Sergt. Samuel Write. (Wright) Jonathan Jeans. (Janes) Ebenezer Parsons. Benjamin Dinwick. (Dunwich) Ebenezer Jeans. (Janes) Nathaniel Curtis. Thomas Scott. John Peck. In the history of Northfield (by Temple and Sheldon) is additional information. Sergt. Wright, aged 45, the Janeses, sons of Elder William Janes, aged respectively 16 and 14, were all of Northfield ; Parsons, aged 20, and Curtis, were of North ampton ; Peck was of Hadley ; Scott, Ipswich ? and Dunwich, residence unknown, perhaps identical with Benjamin Dunnage, CAPT. BEEK S COMPANY AMBUSHED. 131 credited at Brookfield. But one Indian was known to have been killed. Hadley was thirty miles from Northfield, and, unaware of this assault, Capt. Beers, on the next morning, Friday, Sept. 3d, set forthwith thirty-six mounted men and one ox team, on his march to bring off the garrison and people. The march was slow and toilsome, and darkness came upon them when still three or four miles from Northfield, and they were obliged to encamp for the night. It is supposed that the camping was near the small stream called " Four-mile brook." Early on the morning of Saturday the 4th, Capt. Beers with most of his force started on foot, and leaving the horses at the camp with a small guard, and taking the team with stores and ammunition, advanced towards the town, still ignorant of the previous day s assault, and, it seems, entirely unsuspicious of an enemy in the vicinity. The best au thority for the scene and circumstances of the engagement is probably the history of Northfield above mentioned, which I fol low. " He appears to have kept up on the high plain till he came in sight of the little brook, now known as Saw-mill brook. The ravine was now covered with a rank growth of grass and ferns, and the leaves were thick on the young trees." It was at this place that the Indians had placed their ambuscade. He advanced across the brook by the accustomed fording place, and just at the passage, and when his company was most exposed, was furiously attacked in front and flank, and all were thrown into great con fusion, but soon rallied and fought bravely for their lives, but were forced back by superior numbers some three-quarters of a mile to a narrow ravine on the south of a hill now known as " Beers s Hill." Here a stand was made, and here the little band fought about their leader, with the courage of desperation, till their ammunition was exhausted and the captain with nearly every man had fallen ; only a few escaped, joined the guard left behind with the horses, and made their way back to Hadley, thir teen in all. An undoubted tradition points out the grave of Capt. Beers in the ravine where he fell. Hoyt, in his history, published in 1824, says that the bones of the slain were still occasionally found protruding from the sandy knoll where the battle began. Mr. Hubbard relates that twenty men were killed with their leader. Mr. Russell, in his list, says sixteen, and gives the names of eleven. His list is as follows : At Squakheage y e 4 of Sept 16 men were Slayn. Capt. Kick d Beers. John Chenary. Ephraim Child. Benjamin Crackbone. Robert Pepper. Joseph Dickinson. William Markham. George Lycuss. John Gatchell. James Miller. John Wilson. 132 KING PHILIP S WAR. Another list in the Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 254, adds several names and varies the spelling of several, thus : List of Capt. Beeres and those slayn soldiers, 1675. Capt. Beers. John Genery. John Getchell. Benjamin Crackbon. Ephra Child. George Lickens. John Willson. Thomas Cornish. Robert Pepper. Jeremiah Morrell. Elisha Woodward. William Marcum. ) Hadley Joseph Dickerson. ) men. James Mullard. James Egleston. killed with Capt. Beeres. 8 killed at Squakheage with Capt. Beeres of whom there is no acco . It will be noticed that James Egleston, who was killed at Deer- field, is set down here. Robert Pepper of Roxbury was not killed, but taken captive and returned home afterwards. Besides the thirteen that escaped to Hadley that same night, three more came in next day. It is said that several others counted as killed were taken prisoners and afterwards tortured to death. One, whose name is unknown, was reserved for torture, but was freed by a friendly Natick Indian and made his escape. John Parke, son of Thomas of Cambridge Village, was wounded in the fight " in the elbow joint and the bone broken," etc. His petition says it was "in the fight in which Capt. Beers was killed." He re mained at Hadley till Major Appleton s march home, Nov. 24. (See Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 198.) Probably the Indians engaged in the assault were less than one hundred and fifty in number, composed of the Squakeags, and parties of Nashaways, and Quaboags, led by Monoco, alias " One-eyed John," and Saga more Sam. The number of Indians slain was said to be twenty- five, which is probably too large an estimate. On the next day, Sept. 5th, Major Treat, who had come from Hartford to Hadley on the 3d with a company of Connecticut men, one hundred strong, marched up to Northfield. At night (Sunday, 5th) he camped, probably near the camp of Beers, and on the 6th went forward to the scene of the battle, finding a ghastly sight, for many of the heads of the slain had been cut off and set upon poles by the wayside. Pausing only long enough to perform hasty funeral rites, he passed on to the garrison and found all safe. Hurriedly collecting the people and all their effects possible, but obliged to leave the cattle, he marched for Hadley the same evening. Mr. Stoddard, in his letter, says " they left the bodies unburied," which probably has reference to the eight killed at Northfield in the attack on the 2d. Small bodies of the enemy were still lurking in the vicinity of the village, and a party of the English that ventured into the fields were attacked ; they were probably engaged in burying the dead, and Major Treat CREDITS UNDER CAPT. BEERS. 133 was slightly wounded in the thigh. It is said that many of the cattle followed in the retreat of the English, and afterwards came into Hadley. The following are the names in Hull s Journal : Credited with Military Service under Capt: Richard Beeres. October, 5 1675. John Shattuck, Sergt. 02 07 06 Edward Jackson. 00 18 00 Ephraim Beares. 00 12 10 November 9 th 1675. Joseph Sill, Leiut. 08 Nathaniel Bright. 03 11 08 06 06 Elnathan Beeres, Sergt. 05 02 09 Nathaniel Sanger. 04 02 06 Samuel Prentis. 01 04 00 November 20 th 1675. Jacob Hurd. 03 14 06 Richard Beeres, Capt. 06 08 06 Joseph Fuller. 03 07 08 John Parkes. 03 07 08 Benjamin Crackbone. 02 18 00 William Russell. 04 16 00 George Licas. 01 05 08 December 20 th 1675. Richard Wood. 04 16 00 John Cooke. 02 14 00 John Harrington. 04 16 00 Nathaniel Peirce. 03 05 02 GustinJohn. 05 04 06 January 25 th 1675-6. John Wilson. 01 05 08 John Bowditch. 01 16 00 Ephraim Child. 01 05 08 Benjamin Taynter. 04 16 00 February 29 th 1675-6. Thomas Hastings. 02 05 00 Nathaniel King. 00 12 00 The probable reason that so few are credited under Capt. Beers is the fact of his brief command, and also that the twenty-six men delivered to him at Brookfield by Capt. Mosely would prob ably be returned to Mosely and be credited under him; and I am inclined to think that those who survived and continued in the service would look to Capt. Joseph Sill, Beers s lieutenant, to sign their vouchers, and would receive credit under him or the officer that appeared afterwards in command. Shattuck escaped only to be drowned shortly after, crossing Charlestown Ferry. John Harrington of Watertown was badly wounded, but escaped and lived to old age. CAPT. THOMAS LATHROP AND HIS MEN. Thomas Lathrop, or Lothrop, emigrated from England to Salem. He was admitted freeman in 1634, and settled on the " Bass River " side of the town, where he received a grant of land near Mackerel Cove in 1636. He was lieutenant of the Salem Train-Band in 1644 under Capt. Hathorn, and succeeded him as captain of the Artillery Company in 1645. Mr. Felt relates that he was a captain under Major Sedgwick in the expe dition of 1654-5 against Acadia, when St. Johns and Port Royal were reduced. He was an active and influential citizen, repre sented Salem in the General Court in 1647, 53 and 64, and when Beverly was set off in 1668 was chosen first selectman of the new town, and thereafter, till his death, remained a leading actor in all its affairs, civil, ecclesiastical and military. He married 134 KING PHILIP S WAR. Bethia, daughter of Daniel Rea and sister of Joshua, who after his death and before June, 1680, married Joseph Grafton, of Salem, and again for her third husband, June 26, 1683, Dea. William Goodhue, of Ipswich. She died Dec. 6, 1686. Capt. Lathrop left no children, and his sister Ellen, who came with him from England, and became the second wife of Ezekiel Cheever, with her children, inherited his estate. The age of Capt. Lathrop is put at 65 years by Mr. Stone in his history of Beverly. In the Mass. Archives, vol. xlv, p. Ill, there is a petition of Capt. Lathrop, showing that he was in the expeditions against the Pequods in 1636-7. This petition has the signature " Thomas Lawthrop," and is dated 8 : 3mo. 62 ; and while I have some doubt whether here the writing is his own, there can be no doubt of his signature in vol. Ixvii, p. 50, where it appears in a faltering hand as " Tho : Lawthropp." In August, 1675, when the news of the disaster at Brookfield came to the Council, Capt. Lathrop was placed in command of the company raised in Essex County, with some men from Boston and vicinity, and marched up to Brookfield, where he joined the forces of Capt. Beers. Their companies acted mostly together thereafter up to the time of the latter s march from Hadley on September 3d. Elated by recent successes, the Indians pressed more closely about those western towns, watching warily that no opportunity might pass to strike a safe and telling blow. Their leaders constantly outgeneralled our officers, and in every engagement took care to have the odds, in numbers, position, and method of attack, on their side ; and while we are horrified at their atroci ties, we can but admire their adroitness and persistence. In the meantime additional forces of the English were gathering at Hadley and vicinity, and all were under the general direction of Major John Pynchon, of Springfield, commander-in-chief in the county of Hampshire. On the return of Major Treat from Northfield with the garrison and people of that place, a council of war was held, at which it was decided to strengthen the various garrisons and hold the army for the present on the defen sive. The Commissioners of the United Colonies had agreed to raise an army of five hundred men for this campaign on the Con necticut River. Besides the forces of Lathrop and Beers, Capt. Appleton had arrived from the East early in September, and Capt. Mosely with a company of sixty on Tuesday, Sept. 14th, at evening, and probably on the 15th crossed the river and marched up to Deerfield. There, on the Sunday before, the Indians had made an assault on twenty-two men passing from one garrison to another to meeting ; none of ours were killed, but one was taken alive and probably afterwards killed, and Mr. Judd suggests that this was Nathaniel Cornberry, noted by Mr. Russell as among MASSACRE AT " BLOODY BROOK." 135 the slain. The Indians then burned two houses, secured several horse-loads of beef and pork, killed many horses, and with their plunder betook themselves to a hill in Deerfield meadow. On the reception of this news at Northampton, the officers there raised a body of volunteers, who with others from Hadley and a part of Capt. Lathrop s company, marched up on Monday, 13th, to Deerfield garrison, and on the next day went out with the soldiers of the garrison to attack the Indians at the hill, but they were all fled. Major Treat, on Sept. 9th, had returned to Hart ford, leaving a part of his force distributed in the various towns in garrison. On the 15th or 16th he came to Northampton with additional Connecticut troops, and Capt. John Mason, of Nor wich, came there soon after with a body of Mohegan and Pequod Indians. I think it probable that the remainder of Capt. Lathrop s company, except the sick and wounded, passed over with Capt. Mosely. Such was the position of affairs on Sept. 18th. At Deerfield a large quantity of corn had been gathered from the fields and loaded upon carts, teams and drivers provided, and Capt. Lathrop with his company were appointed as a guard to Hadley, where it was to be stored. The English evidently had no thought that any considerable force of the enemy were in the vicinity, and Capt. Mosely and his company remained behind and were scout ing in search of them through the woods about. But a large body had crossed the river secretly, and, undiscovered, were watching every motion of the English ; and now with their usual tactics they placed a large ambuscade in a place which offered unusual advantage, across the line of march. This place was some five miles from the place of starting, at what is now South Deerfield village, where a small stream, then known as " Muddy Brook " (but ever since as " Bloody Brook "), crossed the road. The English seem to have taken no precaution whatever against surprise, and many of the soldiers, it is said, had placed their arms upon the carts to be carried, and were gathering wild grapes by the roadside. We can never know with certainty much of the details of the battle, or rather massacre, that ensued. The survivors on this occasion were few, and doubtless if questioned could give but incoherent and exaggerated accounts. Moreover, contemporary historians seem to have been indifferent to particulars, and to have inclined rather to moralizing upon general events, and succeeding historians have mainly repeated the stories of the first, and it is only within the last few decades that our devoted historical societies, with their increasing facilities, have made the methods of intelligent criticism possible. Gen. Epaphras Hoyt, of Deer- field, wrote a history of the Indian wars more than fifty years ago, which seems to be the first effort at analysis. In that work are many important questions raised and valuable suggestions 136 KING PHILIP S WAR. presented. In regard to this affair he suggests that the main part of the troops had passed over the brook and were waiting the slow movements of the lumbering teams over the rough roads. The Indians crept stealthily about and encompassed the whole company and fell upon them with sudden and terrible fury, so that many were shot down or disabled at the first volley, includ ing probably Capt. Lathrop. Doubtless a brave resistance was made, but with little avail. The coming of Capt. Mosely upon the scene after the disaster, his subsequent fight and opportune reinforcement by Major Treat, have been previously related. It may be noted that here again Major Treat and the Connecti cut soldiers opportunely, and as at Northfield, brought rescue, it is likely, from destruction. Connecticut was wise in trusting and employing the friendly Indians, who never allowed their troops to be ambushed ; while the prejudice of Massachusetts brought upon their companies the dreadful massacres and unavail ing pursuits which excite our wonder and shame even to-day. As to the number of the English killed in this encounter, early accounts vary. In the postscript to a letter from the Massachu setts Council to Richard Smith, of Narraganset, dated Sept. 22, 1675, and still preserved in the Archives, vol. 67, p. 262, the statement is made that " above forty of Capt. Lathrop s men with himself were slain ; " and then it is further stated that Capt. Mosely lost eleven men in the subsequent fight, which together with many lost that were with the teams made up sixty-four in all, who were buried the next day. Mr. Mather relates that above threescore were slain. Mr. Hubbard reckons eighty as the number in the company of the English, including, doubtless, the teamsters, and says that not above seven or eight escaped. In Rev. Mr. Russell s list, noticed above, the number of slain is put at seventy-one. This last is probably nearly correct, as Mr. Hull s credits, now for the first time published, after a lapse of more than two hundred years, go far to prove. The list pertain ing to " Bloody Brook " is given below entire. It has been copied from the original with the utmost care, and proved and tested letter by letter till I feel sure of its accuracy. This list was first copied by Mr. Coffin some fifteen years before he published his " Newbury," and is the most nearly correct of any list that has been published hitherto that I know of ; but a comparison of his text with the original will show many mistakes. The follow ing is the list : At Muddy-Brook bridge y e 18 Sept. 71 men slane. Capt. Thomas Laythrop Caleb Kemball George Ropes Sergt. Thomas Smith Thomas Hobs Joseph Kinge Samuel Stevens Robert Home8 Thomas Alexander John Hobs Edward Traske ffraricis ffriende Daniel Button Richard Lambert Abel Osyer John Harriman Josiah Dodge John Litleale THE SLAIN AT " BLOODY BROOK." 137 Thomas Bayley Peter Woodberry Samuel Hudson Ezekiel Sawier Joseph Bolch Adam Clarke Jacob Kilborne Samuel Whitteridge Ephraim ffarah Thomas Manninge William Buy Robert Wilson Jacob Waynwritt Serg* Samuel Stevens Steven Welman Benjamin Roper Samuel Crumpton Benjamin ffarnell John Bennett John Plum Solomon Alley Thomas Mentor Thomas Buckley John Merrit The forty-two above were evidently soldiers of Capt. Lathrop, and the following were set down by Mr. Russell as including the teamsters : Robert Hinsdall Joshua Carter William Smeade Samuel Hinsdall John Barnard Zebadiah Williams Barnabas Hinsdall James Tufts Eliakim Marshall John Hinsdall Jonathan Plimpton James Mudge Joseph Gillett Philip Barsham George Cole John Allin Thomas Weller The Hinsdalls were the father and three sons. Most of the others were Deerfield men. George Cole is credited under Capt. L., and was probably of his company, perhaps of Lynn. The following men are set down as of Deerfield, and credited by Hull in the " Beefe " account : Richard Weller, William Pixly, Daniel Weld, James Tufts, William Smeade, Joseph Gillett, Experience Hinsdall, John Stebbin, John Hawkes. Nathaniel Sutlive is credited for cattle. Others credited for cattle, billeting, etc., at the same time, June 24, 1676, but of course for the year before : Sarah Field, Ephraim Hinsdall, Solomon Stoddard, Thomas Mek- ins, Barnabas Hinsdall, Joshuah Carter, John Plimpton, Thomas Hastings, Samson Frary, Quentin Stockwell, John Allen, Moses Crafts, Samuel Hinsdall, Peter and Jonathan Plimpton. Thomas Weller was probably son of Richard, and Barnard was of Hadley, son of Francis. Barsham and Williams were of Deerfield, Mar shall and Mudge were probably of Lathrop s company. Marshall, sometime of Stratford, Conn., now perhaps of Boston, and Mudge, of Maiden, son of Thomas and Sarah. From sundry petitions preserved in the Archives, and from casual references here and there, we find a few additional names. Joseph Prince, of Salem, was pressed under Capt. Lathrop and went as far as Quaboag, but was there given leave to go home to his dying father, and did not return to the army. Mrs. Ruth Bates had two sons, Clement and Solomon, who went out with Lathrop and survived the fight, if they were in it, and spent the winter in the garrison at Westfield ; Clement was killed there in the spring, and the mother petitions in April, 1676, for the release of Solomon. John Smith s petition, Archives, vol. 69, p. 23, shows that two servants of his had been pressed, and one of 138 KING PHILIP S WAR. them having been out some three months, was killed with Capt. Lathrop ; his name is not given, but the other, Mungo Craford, having been out near ten months, was left through the winter as a garrison soldier at Hadley or near, and is still there. Smith petitions for his release or pay for his service. Smith was of Boston, and Craford returned and settled there ; Mrs. Bates was the widow of Clement of Hingham. In a note in the Appendix to Edward Everett s Bloody Brook oration, Rev. Joseph B. Felt gives the above list, and adds the place of residence of many. The following in Hull s Journal are Credited under Capt. Thomas Lathrop. October 19, 1675 John Palmer, CorpL 04 11 00 Nov r 9, 1675 John Langbury. 02 08 00 Edmond Bridges. 01 00 00 Joseph Einons. 01 17 00 Samuel Rust. 02 08 00 John Plum. 01 17 08 November 30 th 1675 Richard Lambard. 01 18 06 Samuel Stevens. 02 13 10 Robert Holmes. 02 08 00 Joseph Balch. 01 18 06 Thomas Lathrop, Capt. 09 13 00 Peter Woodbury. 01 18 06 Paul Thorndike. 03 04 04 John Plummer. 00 18 00 Edward Trask. 02 03 00 Thomas Buckly. 01 17 08 Dec. 20 th 1675 Samuel Steevens. 01 17 08 Samuel Chapman. 00 18 10 Thomas Kemball. 00 12 00 Caleb Kemball. 01 16 00 Thomas Hobbs. 01 16 00 Jan y 25, 1675-6. William Dew. (Due) 01 18 06 Josiah Dodge. 01 18 06 John Harriman. 01 18 06 Matthew Scales. 00 18 00 Joseph Pearson. 00 18 00 Jacob Kilborn. 01 18 06 Thomas Baily. 01 18 06 Ezekiel Sawyer. 01 18 06 Blaze Vinton. 01 05 08 Andrew Stickney. George Ropps. Benjamin Roper. Ephraim Farrar. Solomon Ally. Benjamin Furnell. John Merrett. February 29 th Edmoud Moore. Eleazer Keyser. Thomas Manning. Thomas Rose. Stephen Warman. John Littlehall. John Andrews. Samuel Crumpton. Jacob Wainwright, June 24 th Thomas Mentor. Zekeriah Davis. Thomas Rose. Thomas Smith. George Cole. Timothy Bray. John Denison. July 24 th John Bullock. Joseph King. August 24 th Mark Pitman. Thomas Bayly. Abel Ozzier. John Bennett. Moses Pengry. 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 1675-6 03 00 02 03 01 01 01 01 02 1676 01 07 04 01 03 01 00 1676 15 01 1676 01 01 01 01 01 16 00 17 08 17 08 16 00 16 00 16 00 17 08 12 00 12 00 10 06 00 00 17 08 17 08 01 09 18 06 14 06 18 06 04 00 04 00 18 06 11 06 05 08 16 02 08 00 16 00 16 10 16 10 16 00 17 08 19 04 John Bullock was " crippled " in the war, and his large credit may be due to that. He was of Salem, and was afterwards favored WOUNDED OF LATHKOP S COMPANY. 139 by the Court and granted a license to keep a " victualling shop," January 9, 1680. In addition to the above names and facts, we glean the follow ing from various sources. From Coffin s History of Newbury we learn that on August 5th, 1675, were impressed at Newbury, Steven Greenleaf Caleb Richardson Daniel Button Thomas Smith Daniel Rolf Johu Wheeler John Toppan John Hobbs Henry Bodwell and fourteen days provision supplied them by the town. John Toppan at Bloody Brook was wounded in the shoulder, but con cealed himself in the bed of a brook nearly dry by pulling grass and weeds over his body, and thus escaped, though several times the Indians stepped over him. A similar story is told of a soldier who escaped at Beers s fight. Henry Bodwell had his left arm broken, but being of great strength and courage seized his gun in his right hand and swinging it about his head charged furiously through the Indians and got away. Greenleaf, Toppan, Richardson, Wheeler and Bodwell were credited Dec. 10th, under Major Appleton, with such large amounts that I think the service must have included time under Capt. Lathrop. Rolf was credited at Marlborough garrison. Thos. Vary (Very), under Capt. L., was wounded. See his petition, Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 260. In Felt s Ipswich it is stated that Thomas Scott (killed at Northfield) had been of Ipswich, as also Thomas Manning, Jacob Wainwright, Caleb Kimball, Samuel Whittridge. Robert Dutch, of whom Mr. Hub- bard relates the wonderful recovery from apparent death, was also of: Ipswich. Mention is made also of James Bennet slain, and John Fisher wounded. The following bill of Jacob Gardiner, from Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 44, contains further names and suggestions. An Amount of worke Done for Souldiers under y e Commands of Capt : Latherup by Jacob Gardner & by y e order John Coalman Comesary & Daniel White Counstable of Hattfield 12 th of August 75 Tho: Hobbes. a paire of shewes . . . . . 0. 6. Sam: Hudson ; A paire of Sbewes & Leather . . 0. 9. 2 Tho: Bayleff ffor mending shewes . . . . 0. 1. 2 Josiah Bridges Scabert . . . . . . 0. 1. 3 Robert Leach a Scabert and mending His Shewes . 0. 2. 9 Tho: Tenne a pouch & Belt and Mending His Shewes . 0. 1. 3 Thomas Peckes a pouch 0. 1. Capt. Latherup 3 belts . -."-" . . . . 0. 3. Daniel Ring a pouch & belt . . . . . 0. 1. 6 Abiell Sadler a pouch & belt ... . 0. 2. ff ranees Young a pouch & belt . . . . 0. 1. 9 Gershoin Browne a pouch & belt . . . 0. 1. 9 140 KING PHILIP S WAR. JohnTapin; a pouch and belt 0. 1. 9 Steven Butler a pouch & belt . . . . . 0. 1. 9 John Presson a pouch & belt . . . . . 0. 1. 9 John Dauis a pouch & belt . . . . . 0. 1. 9 Samuel Hibbert a pouch & belt 0. 1. 9 Tho: Hayson a pouch & belt 0. 1. 9 Tho: Hobbs a pouch & belt 0. 1.9 Walter Hickson a powder bage & belt . . . 0. 2. 9 John Boynton for mending Shewes . . . . 0. 2. John Wicher a belt 0. 1. 3 Tho: Hayson a belt ... 0. 1. 3 TheTotall 2. 12. 1 To the Honnoured Comety This is to Certifie you that these goods have been delivered to y e persons above written by y e order of : I think it may be fairly inferred from the above bill that nearly all, if not all, those mentioned were in Capt. Lathrop s company. Fourteen of these were credited afterwards under Major Appleton, and will there appear with names a little differently spelled ; for instance, Whicher, Hazen, Toppan, Tenney, etc. Hobbs and Bay- ley are in Russell s death-list, Hickson was credited under Capt. Poole. Presson served under Gardner at Narraganset, and next year under Capt. Turner. Hudson and Peckes appear in a later Ledger, proving that they were not among the unknown slain. Gen. Hoyt, before mentioned, writing in 1824, relates that, " The place where this tragic affair happened is near the centre of the village of Muddy-Brook, and about thirty rods southerly of the meeting-house in that place. The stage road passes over the ground and crosses the brook on a small bridge, precisely where Lathrop passed. A rude monument was erected near the place of attack sometime after the catastrophy. It stood in what is now the front yard of the house of Stephen Whitney, Esq., on the east side of the public way, but is now gone to decay, and two plain stone flags, lying near the front of the house, are its only remains. Several gentlemen have it in contemplation to repair the old or erect a new monument, near the same spot, with ap propriate inscription." The " stone slab " spoken of below may have been placed by the gentlemen referred to. See N. E. H. G. Reg., vol. xxvi, p. 435. On September 30, 1835, the Anniversary of Lathrop s defeat was celebrated at Deerfield, and a monument was afterwards erected there, bearing this inscription : Erected August, 1838. On this ground Capt. Thomas Lathrop and eighty men under his command including eighteen teamsters from Deerfield, conveying stores from that town to Hadley, were ambushed by about 700 Indians, and the Captain and seventy-six men slain Sept. 18th, 1675. SCENE OF THE MASSACRE. 141 Some twenty rods south of this monument the grave of the slain is marked by a stone slab bearing the simple inscription, " Grave of Capt. Lathrop and men slain by the Indians, 1675." On the occasion of the celebration in 1835, Edward Everett delivered the oration, and Miss Harriet Martineau was present, and afterwards wrote a sharp criticism of it. Both address and criticism were fine as literary productions, but equally faulty as history. I am indebted to the Hon. George Sheldon, of Deerfield, for many valuable suggestions in preparing the above chapter. YIII. MAJOR SAMUEL APPLETON AND THE FORCES UNDER HIM. A FULL account of the Appleton family has been published in the " Appleton Memorial " and various other works, and renders a brief sketch sufficient for our purpose here. Samuel Appleton, the ancestor of nearly all of the name in this country, and the first to appear here, was descended from the ancient family of Appulton of Waldingfield, Suffolk, England. He was the son of Thomas, and was born at Little Waldingfield in 1586 ; married Judith Everard, by whom he had six children born in England. John, born 1622; Samuel, born 1624; Sarah, born 1629 ; Mary, Judith and Martha. With his family he came to New England in 1635 and settled at Ipswich, where he was ad mitted freeman, May 25, 1636. He was chosen deputy to the General Court, May 17th, 1637, and was prominent in the affairs of his town thereafter, and died at Rowley in June, 1670. The eldest son John became an influential man in the colony. Was successively lieutenant, captain and major, and deputy to the General Court for fifteen years between 1656 and 1678, and was honorably prominent in opposition to the Andros government. He married Priscilla Glover, by whom he had a large family, and died in 1699. Of the daughters above mentioned, Sarah married Rev. Samuel Phillips, of Rowley, 1651. Judith married Samuel Rogers, son of Rev. Nathaniel, of Ipswich. Martha married Richard Jacob, of Ipswich. Major Samuel Appleton, second son of Samuel first, and the subject of this article, was born as noted above, at Waldingfield, and came with his father to Ipswich at the age of eleven years. His first wife was Hannah Paine, of Ipswich, by whom he had Hannah, Judith and Samuel. By his second wife, Mary Oliver (at marriage, Dec. 8, 1656, aged sixteen), he had John, Major Isaac, Oliver and Joanna. He was chosen deputy to the General Court in 1668, under the title Lieut. ; also in 1669 to 1671, in company with his brother Capt. John, and again by himself in 1673 and 1675. I have not been able to find the exact date on which Capt. Appleton marched from the Bay up towards Hadley, but infer APPLETON MARCHES TO HADLEY. 143 that it was about the first of September, and Mr. Hubbard relates that when Major Treat (on Sept. 6th) marched down from the rescue of Northfield, bringing the garrison, he met Capt. Apple- ton going up, who strongly urged him to turn back and pursue the Indians ; but the Major overruled his wishes, and all marched back to the headquarters at Hadley. The course of events from this time to September 18th has been previously related. In the assignment of troops for the defence of the various towns, Capt. Appleton seems to have remained at Hadley, and to have been in close relation with Major Pynchon in the conduct of affairs. His Lieutenant, John Pickering, and doubtless a part of his com pany, were with Capt. Mosely in the fight succeeding Lathrop s defeat, and when a few days after it was decided to abandon Deerfield, and the garrison and inhabitants were removed to Hat- field, Capt. Mosely was stationed there with his force, Major Treat and his men quartered at Northampton and Northfield, and Capt. Appleton remained at Hadley busily employed in reorgan izing the Massachusetts forces, caring for the wounded, and pre paring for the next attack of the enemy. Although Capt. Appleton had been in this service several weeks, his commission as " Capt. of a company of 100 men " was not issued by the Council until September 24th. (He already held the rank of Captain of the local company in Ipswich ; this was a special commission for active service.) By the heavy losses under Capts. Lathrop and Beers, the Massachusetts forces were greatly reduced, and the survivors of their companies were much demoralized by the loss of the captains, and gloom and discour agement prevailed throughout the colony. It was therefore with great difficulty that the Council filled the quota of three hundred assigned by the commissioners. Secretary Rawson wrote to Major Pynchon, September 30th, " The slaughter in your parts has much damped many spirits for the war. Some men escape away from the press, and others hide away after they are impressed." It will be seen by the following orders that the Council was using every endeavor to push forward troops to repair their losses. Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 265. The Council do order & appoint Capt. John Wayte to conduct the 120 men appointed to rendevooze at Marlborough the 28 th day of this instant September & to deliver them unto the order of Maio r John Pin- cheon Commander in Cheefe in the County of Hampshire & it is fur ther ordered y l in case Capt. Samuel Appleton should be com away from those parts then the said Capt. Wait is ordered to take the con duct and chardge of a Company of 100 men under Maio r John Pincheon but in case Capt Apleton do abide there then Capt. Wait is forthwith to returne Backe unles Maio r Pincheon see cause to detyne him upon y e service of the country past. E. R. S. 24 Sept. 1675 144 KING PHILIP S WAR. On the same paper is the following : It is ordered that there be a comission issued forth to Capt. Sam uel Appletou to Command a foot Company of 100 men In the service of y e country. But in case hee should be com away from those parts then that Capt. Waite is to have (a) like comission. past 24 Sept. 1675 By y e Council E R S Ordered y l y e Commissary Ju Morse deliver Mr Thomas Welden snaphant musket. The Indians were gathered in great numbers on the west side of the river. Small parties were constantly lurking near the frontier towns, Hatfield, Northampton, and as far as Springfield, where, on September 26th, they burned the farm-house and barns of Major Pynchon on the west side of the river. Major Pynchon says, in a letter to the Council, Sept. 30th : "We are endeavouring to discover the enemy and daily send out scouts, but little is effected. Our English are somewhat awk and fear ful in scouting and spying, though we do the best we can. We have no Indian friends here to help us. We find the Indians have their scouts out. Two days ago two Englishmen at Northampton being gone out in the morning to cut wood, and but a short distance from the house, were both shot down dead, having two bullets apiece shot into each of their breasts. The Indians cut off their scalps, took their arms and were off in a trice. According to Russell s list of killed, these men were Praisever Turner and Uzacaby Shakspeer. Up to this time the Springfield Indians had been friendly and remained quietly in their large fort on the east side of the river towards Longmeadow. Some uneasiness had been felt of late in regard to them, and Major Pynchon had consulted the commissioners about disarming them. The Connecticut Council advised against the measure, and rec ommended rather to receive hostages from them, to be sent to Hartford for security. This plan was adopted and the hostages sent; but the Indians, excited by the successes of the hostiles, and probably urged by secret agents of Philip, resolved to join the war against the English. They managed the escape of their hostages, and waited the opportunity to strike their blow. On Monday, Oct. 4th, a large body of the enemy had been reported some five or six miles from Hadley, and immediately all the soldiers were withdrawn from Springfield to Hadley, and were preparing to go out against the Indians the next morning ; but during the night a messenger arrived from Hartford or Windsor, reporting that Toto, a friendly Windsor Indian, had disclosed a plot of the Springfield Indians to destroy that town next day, and that five hundred of Philip s Indians were in the Springfield fort, ready to fall upon the town. Thereupon, early on the DEFENCE OF THE RIVER TOWNS. 145 morning of Tuesday, October 5th, Major Pynchon, with Capts. Apple ton and Sill, and a force of one hundred and ninety men, marched for Springfield, arriving there to find the town in flames and the Indians just fled. Major Treat had also received news of the intended attack, and hastened from Westfield with his com pany, arriving on the west side of the river some hours before the Massachusetts forces came, but was unable to cross, though five Springfield men escaped through the enemy s lines, hotly pur sued, and carried over a boat in which a party attempted to cross, but the Indians gathered upon the east shore and fired upon them so fiercely that the attempt was abandoned until Major Pynchon came. The Indians burned some thirty dwelling-houses and twenty-five barns with their contents, Major Pynchon s mills, and several of his houses and barns, occupied by tenants. Fif teen houses in the "town-plat," and some sixty more in the out skirts and on the west side were left unharmed. The people had taken refuge in the garrison-houses, which were not attacked. Two men and women were killed, viz., Lieut. Thomas Cooper, who before the assault rode out towards the fort to treat with the Indians, having two or three men with him, and was shot by an enemy concealed in the bushes a short distance from the town, but managed to ride to the nearest garrison-house, where he died. His companion, Thomas Miller, was killed on the spot. During the assault, Pentecost, wife of John Matthews, was killed, and Nathaniel Browne and Edmund Pringridays were mortally wounded. The above account is the substance of letters written by Major Pynchon and Rev. John Russell, October 5th and 6th. The number of Indians engaged has probably been much over-esti mated. The Springfield squaw captured at the time reported the whole number at two hundred and seventy. Mr. Russell said the Springfield people thought there were not " above 100 Indians, of whom their own were the chief." Rev. Pelatiah Glover, the minister of Springfield, lost his house, goods and pro visions, together with a valuable library which he had lately removed to his house from the garrison-house where it had been stored for some time. On October 8th Major Pynchon writes to the Council an official account of the situation, telling of the great discourage ment of the people and their sad state ; the loss of their mills makes a scarcity of bread, and the many houseless families throng the houses that remain. The Major advises to garrison all the towns, and abandon the useless and hazardous method of hunting the Indians in their swamps and thickets. The com missioners were opposed to this course, especially those of Con necticut, who insisted that the purpose of the army in the field was to pursue and destroy the enemy instead of simply protect ing the towns. In this letter of the 8th, Major Pynchon says 146 KING PHILIP S WAR. they are scouting to find which way the Indians have gone, and also that on that day Major Treat is summoned away to Connecti cut by the news of a large body of the enemy near Wethersfield. He then earnestly reiterates his unfitness for the chief command, and declares that he must devolve the authority upon Capt. Appleton, with the permission of the Council, unless Major Treat return, when he will await their orders. The Council had, however, already granted his former request, and on Oct. 4th had appointed Capt. Appleton to the chief command in his place. His commission, together with letters and orders to Major Pynchon, were sent up by Lieut. Phinehas Uphain and his com pany of recruits, and did not reach them until October 12th, when he immediately took command. The commission is as follows : Capt. Appleton. The Councill have seriously considered the earnest desires of major Pynchon & the great affliction upon him & his family, & have at last consented to his request to dismiss him from the cheefe command over the Army in those parts, and have thought meet upon mature thoughts to comitt the cheefe comand unto yourself e, being pers waded that God hath endeowed you with a spirit and ability to mannage that affayre ; and for the Better inabling you to yo r imploy, we have sent the Councills order Inclosed to major Pynchon to bee given you ; and wee reffer you to the Instructions given him for yo r direction, ordering you from time to time to give us advise of all occurences, & if you need any further orders & instructions, they shall be given you as y e matter shall require. So comitting you to the Lord, desireing his presence with you and bless ing upon you, wee remaine : Your friends and Servants Boston 4 th of October Capt. Samuel Appleton, Commander in cheefe at the head quarters at Hadley. The letter of October 4th, from the Massachusetts Council to Major Pynchon, in which the orders above referred to were in closed, is in the Massachusetts Archives, vol. 67, p. 280, as follows : Mass. Council to Major Pynchon Honoured S r Your letter dat Sept. 29. wee received and although wee could have desired your continuance in that trust committed to you as coiSander over o r forces in y r p ts , yet considering your great importunity y e reasons alledged wee cann but greatly simpathize with you in y e present dispen sation of Divine Providence towards your f arnily in your absence and have ordered Capt. Apelton to take the charge as Comander in Cheife over the united forces whiles in o r Colony, and uppou a removall of the seat of Warr the Comanders to take place according to (the) appoynt- ment of y e Commissioners. We have considered (that) you will not be wanting to afford the best advice & assistance you may, although dismist from y e perticular charge. It is the Lord s holy will yet to LETTERS FROM THE COUNCIL. 147 keep his poore people at a p r adventnre and y f in this case wherein our all is concerned and there is none to tell us how long, yet is it o r duty to wayte on him who hideth his face from the house of Israel, and to say w th y Ch: I will brave y 6 indignation of God untill he pie (ad) e our case, &c. Commending you & yours, & y low estate of his people to y e shepardly Care of him who hath made it one p 4 of his great name, Mighty to Save ; wee take leave and rernayne, Y or assured ffreinds, E R S Past y e Council. Boston 4 th of Sept. (should be Oct.) 1675 S r Wee have ordered L l Upham to lead up to you 30 men and do fur ther order that L l Scill be dismissed home to his family, and his sould- jers to make up some of y c companies as y c chiefe Coniander shall order & y e above named L l Upham to be L 4 under Capt Wayte. These for Major John Pynchon. S r It is desired when the companies with you are filled up, such as are fitted to be dismist be sent back with Lef Sill & Corporal Poole & to send downe what horses you canii, and as may be conveniently spayred. On assuming command on October 12th, Capt. Appleton writes a long letter, expressing his sense of the honor conferred and the great responsibility imposed by the appointment, and declaring that he is led to accept by the urgency of the occasion and his regard for the earnest wishes of Major Pynchon ; and while dep recating his own incapacity, promises to do his best until they may find some abler officer for the position. He agrees with Major Pynchon in regard to present methods, and asks that the commissioners revise that part of their instructions which strictly prohibits fixing soldiers in garrisons. He adds his account of the condition of Springfield, and asks the Council to support him in the step he has taken in stationing Capt. Sill and his company there for the town s security. He complains of the prolonged absence of Major Treat and his company at Hartford. He sa} r s that " There being now come in sixty men under Capt. Poole and Lieft. Upham, and we needing commanders, especially part of our men being now at Springfield, & we not daring to send all thither, we have retained Capt. Poole to comand these sixty men untill further orders be given." October 17th he writes an account of their movements up to that date : On Tuesday Octo: 12. we left Springfield & came y 1 night to Hadley neer 30 mile. On y e 13 th & 14 th we used all diligence to make discovery of y e enemy by Scouts, but by reason of y e distance of the way from hence to Squakeage & y e timorous nesse of y e Scouts it turned to little account ; thereupon I found it very difficult to know what to doe. Major Treat was gone from us, and when like to return we knew not. Our orders were to leave 110 men in garrison, but keepe all for a field 148 KING PHILIP S WAR. armye, w ch was to expose the Towns tomanefest hazzard. To sitt still and do nothinge is to tire o r s [ourselves] and spoyle o r souldiers, and to ruin y e country by y e insupportable burden and charge. All things layed together, I thought it best to goe forth after the enemy w" 1 o r p r sent forces. This once resolved, I sent forth warrants, on y e 14 th in stant, early in the morning to Capt. Mosely & Capt.* (as he is called) Seely at Hatfeild and Northampton, to repair fourthw" 1 to y e head quarters, y l we might be ready for service, etc. Capt. Mosely came promptly, but Seely tardily and then with out his company, pleading his want of commission from Connecti cut authorities, but finally agreeing to return and bring his men. Before he started from Northampton, however, he received orders from Major Treat not to leave that town, and sends that word to Capt. Appleton. The Captain much exercised by this seem ing insubordination, posts away letters of complaint to the Con necticut Council, and urges the return of Major Treat, whom he highly commends as " a worthy Gentleman and discreete and incouraging Comander." After this he drew out his own men and marched towards Northfield, but before proceeding two miles intelligence came that the Indians were discovered in great num bers on the west side of the river. Thereupon he crossed to Hatfield with the purpose of marching to Deerfield. Night came on as they left Hatfield, and after marching some miles his officers urged the exposed condition of the towns left without garrisons and the uncertainty of the enemy s movements, and the night prom ising to be tempestuous, he yielded his purpose and returned, against his inclination, to headquarters. On the evening of the 16th an urgent request for reinforcement comes from Northampton, which is threatened, and later, word from Capt. Mosely that the Ind ians are discovered within a mile of Hatfield ; and so at midnight he crosses the river to Hatfield, leaving only about twenty men to guard Hadley and their wounded men. In a postscript to this letter, added on the afternoon of the 17th, he says that after " a tedious night and morning s march " they had not succeeded in finding the enemy. It is supposed that Philip had an active part in the planning of the various operations of this time, though there is no evidence that he was personally present at any of the attacks. Several letters in this time passed between Capt. Appleton and the Council of Connecticut, which are full of interest as showing the varying aspects of affairs at the time. Connecticut urges that their own towns are threatened, and further that Plymouth Colony has not sent its quota, and that there is no certain movement on foot that demands the presence of their troops at Hadley, etc. These letters are preserved in the Mass. Archives, vols. 67 and 68. and have been published in the " Appleton Memorial." and certain of them elsewhere. It is unfortunate that no letters of Capt. Appleton relating to APPLETON AT HADLEY AND HATFIELD. 149 the attack upon Hatfield on October 19th are preserved. There can be no doubt that he wrote an official account of it ; but the Massachusetts Council had not received the news on October 23d, for on that day they wrote Capt. Appleton in answer to his of the 17th, and make no reference to any attack. The next letter to him from the Council, so far as known, is dated November 1st, and refers to one from him of the 29th October, which would seem to have been mainly taken up with a relation of the insub ordination of the Connecticut officers. Doubtless several letters passed that are lost. The letters from a merchant of Boston to his friend in London, published in Drake s " Old Indian Chron icle," give information of the beginning of the attack. The Ind ians built large fires north of Hatfield, and then lay in ambush by the way leading thither. Ten horsemen were sent out as scouts about noon, of whom nine were shot down or captured by the Indians in ambush, and one escaped back to Hatfield, and im mediately the enemy came with fury about the town. But, says Mr. Hubbard According to the Good Providence of Almighty God, Major Treat was newly returned to North-Hampton, Capt. Mosely and Capt. Poole were then garrisoning the said Hatfield, and Capt. Appleton for the like end quartering at Hadley, when on a sudden 7 or 800 of the enemy came upon the town in all quarters, having first taken or killed two or three of the scouts belonging to the town and seven more belonging to Capt. Mosely s company, but they were so well enter tained on all hands where they attempted to break in upon the town that they found it too hot for them, Major Appleton with great courage defending one end of the town, and Capt. Mosely as stoutly main taining the middle, and Capt. Poole the other end ; that they were by the resolution of the English instantly beaten off without doing much harm. Capt. Appleton s serjeant was mortally wounded just by his side, another bullet passing through his own hair, by that whisper tell ing him that death was very near but doing him no other harm. Night came on, and in the darkness it was impossible to tell the losses of the enemy ; numbers were seen to fall, some ran through a small river, others cast away their guns, and as usual they carried away their dead. Of the English slain at Hatfield, Mr. Russell s list has the names of ten, viz. : Freegrace Norton (Appleton s sergeant), of Ipswich, mortally wounded, and died at Hadley soon after ; and of the scouts, Thomas Meekins, Jr., of Hatfield ; Nathaniel Collins, his servant, Richard Stone, Samuel Clarke of Mosely s company, John Pocock of Captain Poole s, Thomas Warner, Abram Quiddington, perhaps of Boston, William Olverton (possibly Overton^), John Petts. Three of these are said to have been taken alive, of whom two were redeemed by some gentlemen at Albany, and arrived at New York the next February ; one of these belonged in Boston. The third man was barbarously killed by the Indians. The Indians 150 KING PHILIP S WAR. evinced a stubborn determination to destroy these river towns, and a few days after the attack upon Hatfield prepared to asault Northampton ; Major Treat s opportune arrival foiled them again. They waylaid every road between the towns. On the 27th a party with Major Pynchon were thus ambushed, and John Dumbleton and John and William Brooks were killed. About this time also a Mr. Granger was wounded. In their letter of November 1st the Massachusetts Council assure Capt. Appleton of speedy action in regard to his affairs at the seat of war. They sustain him in his authority and position towards Connecticut troops, and advise him that in case Major Treat again withdraws, to improve his own troops as best he may, and await their further advice. They rebuke him for assuming to appoint Cornet Poole captain without their authority, and instruct him that it is his place to recommend any officer for pro motion to the Council to receive his commission at their behest. On November 10th Capt. Appleton had not received any further advices from the Council and writes them for orders, and gives ex planation of his action in regard to appointing Poole, that he acted from necessity, and as is evident very wisely. He then details his motions since October 29th, when two men and a boy at Northamp ton were attacked. (These were Joseph Baker, Joseph Baker, Jr., and Thomas Salmon, and Mr. Russell puts with them John Rob erts, a wounded soldier, who died there soon after.) On the 30th, at night, upon an alarm from Hatfield, Capt. Appleton was called out of his bed and pushed his troops across the river, where he re mained over the next day, Sunday. On Monday he marched ten or twelve miles out through the " Chestnutt Mountains," scouting, without avail. Tuesday he consulted with Major Treat, and agreed to march on Wednesday night with their whole force towards Deerfield, which they did without finding the enemy, and returned late at night. On the 5th an alarm at Northampton, and another fruitless search. Upon a request of Major Treat on the 6th for permission to withdraw his soldiers from Westfield to seek the enemy down the river, a council-of-war was appointed for Monday the 8th, at which meeting Capt. Appleton took the ground that he had no authority from the commissioners to grant them leave to withdraw. Major Treat took a very frank and manly position, by no means hostile to Capt. Appleton. The trouble seems to have been the unwillingness of the Connecticut soldiers to remain in garrison at Westfield. The report of the council-of-war is sub mitted to the Massachusetts Council for the orders of the commis sioners. He says they are at loss to find out the present location or intention of the enemy, but fear they may be upon them in force at any moment. He suggests that if the army be drawn off for the winter and the towns garrisoned, Connecticut troops might more conveniently be placed and supplied at Westfield and Northampton, and the other three towns garrisoned with Massa- OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ? 151 chusetts men. He reports a council-at-war, at which David Bennet, chirurgion, was expelled from the arrny for " quarrel some and rebellious Carriage," and submits the action for ratifi cation to the Council. He sends down as posts, Serg. James Johnson, Serg. John Throp, and Nathaniel Warner of Hadley, and with them Capt. Poole, to whom he refers them for a more detailed account of matters. While awaiting the long delayed instructions of the Council, Capt. Appleton stood in a very difficult position, the Connecticut officers and soldiers in great impatience and almost open mutiny at being kept in garrison ; and the people, crowded into the gar rison-houses in fear that Philip s whole force might at any hour fall upon them, were threatening to abandon their towns. The Council of Connecticut, too, were apparently interfering with his command of their troops. On the other hand were the authority and orders of the United Commissioners, to which he adhered with inflexible energy. On November 12th he issued a proclama tion (Archives, vol. 68, p. 54) to the inhabitants and soldiers of all those towns under his charge, forbidding any one to with draw from his appointed place without special permission "given under his hand ; " giving his reasons for the step, and asserting the authority of the commissioners. The Connecticut people were very loud in their complaints against this measure, but he rigidly held to it, daily expecting the further directions promised by the Council of Massachusetts, till finally despairing of such relief he reluctantly yielded to the importunities of Connecticut, and on November 19th dismissed Major Treat and his forces at Westfield to march downward to the Connecticut towns, accom panying the order of permission with an urgent request to the Council there that Westfield and Springfield may be regarrisoned by their forces. On the same day he writes to Governor Leverett, complaining of the long neglect of the Council at home, and say ing that it has kept him in constant and tedious expectation until obliged to yield to Connecticut s demands, and now necessity forces him to dispose of his forces as best he may. He complains of the condition of the horses ; many will soon be unfit for ser vice, and if put upon " dry meate " (i.e. hay), the cattle of the people must perish during the winter, as hay is very scarce. They have no certain intelligence of the enemy, but have received word from Owenequo, son of Uncas, that Philip boasts himself to be a thousand strong. He speaks of his proclamation and its results, and encloses a copy of the same and his correspondence with Connecticut Council also, and urges the Governor to send him further directions speedily. He then proceeds to garrison the several towns with the forces at his disposal, the details of which will be given in a special chapter. The following orders of dis posal are dated November 19 and 20, and are preserved in full in the Mass. Archives, vol. 58, pp. 65 and 66. 152 KING PHILIP S WAR. Twenty-nine soldiers taken out of the companies of Capts. Mosely and Poole and Lieut. Upham are left at Westfield in charge of Sergt. Lamb, and all under the command of Capt. Aaron Cooke. John Roote is appointed commissary of this garrison, and orders are drawn upon James Richards, of Hartford, or Mr. Blackleach, for whatever of clothing is necessary. Thirty-nine men from Capt. Sill s company are left at Springfield with Lieut. Niles, all to be under command of Major Pynchon. Twenty-six men are left with Sergt. at Northampton, to be under com mand of Lieut. Clark; and thirty men under command of Capt. Poole are stationed at Hadley. Thirty-six are left at Hatfield with Sergt. Graves, under command of Lieut. Allice. Capt. Appleton appointed a council-of-war for the ordering of military matters in the towns, consisting of the commissioned offi cers of the various garrisons, together with Dea. Peter Tilton, of Hadley, and Sergt. Isaac Graves, of Hatfield, and Capt. Poole was made president. These arrangements seem to have been made in anticipation of the order of withdrawal of the army, which was authorized by the Council on November 16th. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 58. Their letter had not reached him on November 19th. This letter gives a long account of the operations of Capts. Hench man and Syll now in theNipmuck country. Then " touching the disposal of the Army," the direction is left at his discretion, and as to the wounded men, those fit for garrison duty are to be left as part of the garrison soldiery and the rest to be comfortably provided for. The special instructions seem to have been in accordance with the Major s own suggestions in his last letter to the Council. On the march home it is suggested that he come by way of " Wabquisit " (now in Woodstock, Conn.), and, if convenient, to form a junction with Henchman and Syll and "distress the enemy" gathered near there. This little plan, so easy to conceive in the Council Chamber, for excellent reasons was never realized. Capt. Appleton, with his forces, marched homeward probably about November 24th. Very little is known of the march home ward. This campaign cost the colony very dearly in men and means, but had saved from destruction five of the seven western towns. For the first time since the war began, a competent com mander is at the head of the Massachusetts troops. Upon the organization of the army for the expedition against the Narraganset Fort, Major Appleton was appointed to the com mand of the Massachusetts forces. A partial account of that expedition and its results has been given in a previous chapter relating to Capt. Mosely. On December 9th the Massachusetts force, consisting of six companies of foot under Capts. Mosely, Gardiner, Davenport, Oliver and Johnson, and a troop of horse under Capt. Prentice, mustered on Dedham Plain under com mand of Major Appleton, who himself led the first company. They were joined by the Plymouth forces, two companies under APPLETON S COMMAND AT NARRAGANSET. 153 Major William Bradford and Capt. John Gorharn. The quota of Plymouth Colony was one hundred and fifty-eight men. That of Massachusetts five hundred and twenty-seven. In the Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 91, I find this fragment rela tive to Major Appleton s division : The full complement of the Massachusetts is 527, 13 under the im pressed men, so that if there should want 13 troopers and be but 62 troopers besides their officers there would be but 465 foote & if less than 62 troopers they must be suplyed with so many foote soldjers. These seem to be fragments of memoranda, the latter list being on the back of the paper. This refers to the number in the six companies, and gives an excess of 99 over the estimated quota of 465 foot. I doubt that this excess includes Capt. Prentice s troopers as might at first appear, his company not being set down ; but his lists and credits published hereinbefore give few if any of the names included in Appleton s, Mosely s or Johnson s lists, which were taken at Dedham, December 9th, and contain exactly the numbers above. It is probable that the excess con sisted of volunteers, the regular quota being impressed men. In this expedition Capt. Mosely took Capt. Hubbard s place, and then his company was not made up wholly of volunteers. Troopers Boston 15 foote Major Appleton 136 Prentice 20 Capt. Johnson 75 Hasey 20 Capt. Ollivers 83 Corwine 10 Capt. Davenport 75 Appleton 1 Capt. Gardiner 95 Capt. Mosely 92 75 465 540 556 465 099 Mr. Hubbard says that the force from the latter colony mus tered there four hundred and sixty-five " fighting men besides a Troop of Horse " under Capt. Prentice. Gov. Josiah Winslow, of Plymouth, was commander-in-chief of the army in this expe dition, and with this force marched to Woodcock s Garrison (Attleboro ), that day, thence to Seaconck, where they arrived on the night of the llth, arid on the 12th passed over Patuxet River, and by way of Providence arrived at Wickford, at Smith s Garrison, at night. After several days spent in scouting and skirmishing, as previously related, on the 18th they all marched out to Pettisquamscott and met the Connecticut forces, consist ing of five companies, three hundred and twenty-five men, under Major Treat, and the whole army were forced to bivouac in the open air in a driving snow-storm during the night, Bull s Garrison- house at that place having been burned by the Indians but a few days before. At daybreak next morning they took up their 154 KING PHILIP S WAR. march over the rough country through the deepening snow, each man carrying his own arms, rations, etc. In this march the Massa chusetts division led ; Plymouth held the centre and Connecticut the rear. This army, the largest and best organized that had ever been in the field in the American colonies, arrived about 1 o clock, P.M., at the borders of the great swamp where the Indians had gathered in great numbers and had built a strong fortification and now awaited the attack. The full account of the battle must be completed in several chapters, wherein the names of those in the remaining companies of Major Appleton s division are given. The conduct of the Major and his men here, as elsewhere, was creditable. In May, 1676, the Court voted to repay the losses of divers persons who were " damnified " by the burning of Major Appleton s tent at Narraganset. December 10. 1675. Thomas Davis John Ford Israel Thorn Thomas Waite Francis Young, Corp 1 Ezekiel Woodward Samuel Rust Sylvester Hayes Stephen Gullifer Thomas Hastings Roger Vicar Stephen Butler Robert Sibly William Knowlton Thomas Brown Thomas Ferman Isaac Ilsley Samuel Brabrook Arthur Neale John Boyntou Israel Henerick Robert Simson Samuel Very Philip Matoone Philemon Dean Gershom Browne Andrew Heding Robert Downes Robert Pease Thomas Tenny Thomas Hazen William Webb Solomon Watts Nathaniel Masters under Capt. Samuel Appleton. 75. 04 18 06 03 10 00 03 18 00 03 18 00 Isaac Ellery Daniel Ringe, Corp 1 John Pengilly, Corp 1 Stephen Greenleaf Richard Hancock 04 11 00 05 17 00 John Whicher, Serg* William Williams 04 00 00 05 03 00 02 10 06 02 14 00 02 10 06 Joseph Blancher George Stedman Thomas Sparke John Raymond Samuel Foster 03 18 00 02 10 06 Henry Cooke Samuel Hebard 04 16 10 John Davis 02 10 06 Samuel lerson 04 16 10 02 10 06 02 10 06 Joseph Eaton James Brearly Abial Sadler 02 10 06 04 16 10 03 18 00 William Wainwright Benjamin Webster John Warner 03 18 00 03 18 00 02 10 06 Ephraim Cutter Thomas Abbey John Dennis 05 17 00 03 18 00 02 10 06 03 18 00 Josiah Bridg Roger Markes Timothy Breed Thomas Chase 03 18 00 John Parker 03 18 00 John Wheeler 03 18 00 John Conant 02 10 06 Edmond Sheffeild 02 10 06 John Robins 04 16 10 Anthony Williams 02 04 02 19 08 16 03 05 03 02 10 06 11 03 03 03 03 02 00 00 10 18 00 17 00 18 00 14 10 02 10 06 18 00 18 00 18 00 03 18 00 03 18 00 03 18 00 18 00 10 06 04 16 00 03 18 00 03 18 00 04 16 10 02 10 06 03 04 06 03 18 00 04 18 06 07 16 00 02 10 06 18 00 18 00 10 00 09 12 00 04 16 10 04 16 00 03 18 00 03 18 00 03 03 01 CREDITED UNDER MAJOR APPLETON. 155 John Gainidg Elias Tatingham Eleazer Flagg Samuel Pepar Seth Story Nathaniel Wood Joseph Mansfield Benjamin Chadwell John Pikering, D John Newell Richard Sutton, Corp 1 John Rily Michael DeReeke Jeremiah Swaine, L l Benjamin Langdon Richard Bryar William Stanly Joseph Richardson Henry Bedwell John Tappin Caleb Richardson Edward Ardway Thomas Parlor Daniel Hawes Robert Dutch Samuel Ingolls Jonathan Copp William Bateman Stephen Greenleaf January 25, 1675-6 William Hawkins, Dr. John Warner Ralph Powell Jonathan Copp March 24, 1675-6 Thomas Kylam Samuel Peirce Edward Ardway John Thomas Samuel Foster John Harvy Edmund Brown Samuel Tiler Lewis Zacharius Philemon Dane William Hodgkin John Perkins Thomas Palmer Joseph Bigsby Robert Downes John Layton John Stickney 04 16 10 Thomas Hazon 02 14 00 03 18 00 Simon Gawin 02 02 00 02 10 06 Ephraim Cutter 02 14 00 02 10 06 William Brown 02 14 00 04 16 00 Thomas Waite 02 14 00 02 10 06 William Russell 02 14 00 03 18 00 William Sawyer 02 15 08 02 10 06 April 24, 1676 04 05 10 Francis Young 04 05 02 03 05 18 12 00 00 Samuel Browne ) Gershom Browne } 02 14 00 02 10 06 Solomon Watts 02 02 00 04 16 10 Stephen Gullipher 03 03 00 09 15 00 Mauasseh Kempthorne 03 08 06 02 10 06 Thomas Abby 05 02 00 03 18 00 June 24 th , 1676 03 16 02 John Thorp 08 18 00 03 18 00 Joseph Eaton 02 14 00 04 16 10 John Mors. Commisary 07 10 00 04 16 10 John Dodge 01 10 00 04 16 10 Edward Neland 02 00 00 04 16 10 Edward Marston 01 04 00 03 18 00 Ambros Dawes 03 06 06 02 10 06 Jonathan Emery 02 14 00 04 16 10 Jonathan Copp 04 19 06 03 18 00 Thomas Davis 02 14 00 02 10 06 Simon Adams 02 14 00 04 16 00 William Kuowlton 02 16 06 00 16 00 Thomas Rogers 02 15 08 >-6 Jonathan Emery 01 00 00 04 08 06 Christopher Keniston 04 10 00 01 16 00 Thomas Dow 02 14 00 01 12 06 Eleazer Flagg 02 14 00 01 04 00 John Davis 02 14 00 -6 George Stedman 02 14 00 02 15 06 Thomas French 02 15 08 02 15 08 James Butterick 02 14 00 02 15 08 Seth Story 03 06 00 02 15 08 Eliah Tottingham 01 15 02 02 14 00 John Pengilly 04 04 09 03 00 00 Henry Poore 02 15 08 03 05 08 John Raymant 02 16 06 03 07 08 Isaac Ashby 02 16 06 02 15 08 James Spike 00 18 00 05 11 04 Samuel Poore 02 16 06 02 15 08 John Cutler Ghirurgion 10 00 00 03 05 00 Robert Simsou 04 04 00 02 14 00 Robert Leech 03 18 00 02 14 00 John Lovell 02 15 08 02 15 08 Abiell Sadler 02 15 08 02 14 00 Philip Matoou 02 15 08 02 14 00 Thomas Sparkes 02 14 00 156 KING PHILIP S WAR. Jacob Wilier, Chirurgionlb 00 00 Samuel Apple ton, Jf a/or 30 00 00 July 24 th 1676 Richard Godfrey 04 16 00 Morgon Jones 02 14 00 Joshuah Boynton 02 14 00 Nicholas Rawlins 02 15 08 02 14 00 06 15 00 02 08 10 02 14 00 02 15 08 Zacheus Newmarch Richard Way Benjamin Newman Abraham Fitch Samuel Perkins Richard Prior David Bennett John Lovitt Israel Blake Abraham Drake Morris Hobbs Francis Gennings John Sleeper Israel Clifford Micael Towsely William Samborn Thomas Roby John Browne 02 15 08 13 00 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 4 men Slayne Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 104. A List of Major Sam 1 Apletons Souldjers y l were slayne & wounded The 19 th Decemb 75 at the Indian s fort at Narraganset Samuell Taylor of Ipswich Isaac Illery of Glocester Daniel Rolfe of Newbery Samuel Taylor of Rowley l Leift. Jerrimyah Swayne of Redding Roger Markes of Andiver Isaac Ilsley of Newbery W m Standley of Newbery Dani. Somersby of Newbery Jonathan Emery of Newbery Jn Dennison of Ipswich Jn Harvey of Newbery George Timson of Ipswich Tho: Dowe of Ipswich Symon Gowen of Rowley Benj. Webster of Salem Ellja Thathan of Oborne Tho: Abey of Wenham Benj. Langdon of Boston Solomon Watts of Roxbury Jn Warner of Charlestowne Samuell Boutericke of Cambridge eighteen men wounded who are at Road Island except y e Left. & Roger Marks January 6 75 The following paper, preserved in the Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 97, is the roll of Major Appleton s company in the Narraganset campaign. Jeremiah Swain of Reading was Lieutenant. Serg t Ezek Woodward Serg t John Whicher Steven Buttler Samuell Verry Steven Gullever Daniell Hall 1 In the list of killed appear two Samuel Taylors. In the credits is found Samuel Tiler. In a list of men impressed at Rowley, Nov. 29, 1675, 1 find Samuel Tiller. Among the wounded, Timson undoubtedly meant Stimpson, and " lllja Thathan of Oborne," was what the clerk made out of Elijah Tattingham of Woburn. The name appears elsewhere as Totenham and Totman. The other changes are simple. OTHER LISTS OF APPLETON 5 S MEN. 157 Serg t ffrancis Young Serg t Daniel Ringe Corp John Pengillie Corp James Brarly Clarke Phillemon Dean Trump r John Wheeler Trump Josiah Bridges Thomas Wayte Thomas Sparkes Abiell Saddler Gershom Browne Israel Henricks Thomas Tennie Thomas Hazon Robert Downes Richard Briar Joseph Richardson Thomas Chase William Williams Thomas Abbey John Rayment Robert Leach Samuell Hebbert Anthonie Williams William Waynright Samuell Foster Henry Cooke 1 Robert Simson Israel Thorue Samuell lerson John Newhalle Timothie Breed Samuel Pipin Phillip Mattoone Nath Wood Robert Sibbly Will. Webb Joseph Eaton Roger Vicar Arthur Neale Isaac Ellirie Ben Chadwell John Davis Samuel Brabrooke Isack Ilsley Roger Markes Ben Leingdou John Reylie Solomon Watts Eliezer Flagg John Warner Thomas Firman Will Knowlton Nath Masters Michale Derrick Thomas Davis Calleb Richardson John Boyentou Seth Story Ben Webbster Edward Ardaway Samuel Ruste Silvester Haz Will Russel Sam. Peirce Sam. Buttrick Ephraim Cutter George Stedman Edmund Sheffeild Roger Joans, 75 Those yt are wanting John Ford John Davis Thomas Parlor Robert Peas The men yt are now listed Mosses Pengrie John Denison John Perkins Abraham Kuowlton Thomas ffossey * Lewis Zachriah John Lovwell Sam. Peirce George Stimson Thomas Dow Thomas ffrensh Sam. Hunt John Thomas Abraham Fitts Richard Bedford Thomas Killam Isack Cummins Richard Partsmore Samuel Perkins Peter Emmous Nath Emerson Symond Adams Zacheus Newmarsh John Hobkins John Sticknie Joseph Jewett Joshua Boyenton John Leyton John Jackson Will Brown Caleb Jackson Sam. Tyler Thomas Palmor Joseph Bigsby Simond Gowiii Daniell Somersby Christopher Bartlet Edmond Browne Jonathan Emerie Christopher Kenniston Christopher Cole John Straton John Harvey George Maier Nicolaz Rollings Thomas Roggers Cornelius Davis Jonathan Clarke Will m Sayward William Warrin John Shepard John Guylie Morsain Joanes 1 Are scratched out in the MS. ffossey appears elsewhere as Fausee, Pipin as Pepar, Guylie as Guild. Some twenty-five on this list do not appear in Hull s credits under Major Appleton, but I have found nearly all mentioned elsewhere. 158 KING PHILIP S WAK. Richard Priar Samuell Love well 61 new men Ben Newman Steven Swet 75 old souldjers Will Hodskins Izrah Roff 136 Sam Taylor Sam. Poore Amos Goddin Henry Poore Soon after the battle of Narraganset Major Appleton retired from his protracted and arduous service in the field. On the 19th of October, 1676, the Court appointed him to command an expedition to Pascataqua ; but he probably declined, as the order was rescinded on October 23d. He was reflected deputy in 1676, and subsequently, except 1678, until 1681, when he was chosen Assistant, and remained in that office till the coming in of the Andros government in 1686. He was proscribed by Sir Edmund s officer, Randolph, as one of the " factious." He was arrested on the general complaint of being " evil disposed and seditious," October 19th, 1687, and refusing to submit and give bonds for his good behavior, was committed to Boston jail, where he was kept many months till his age and increasing infirmities forced a reluctant submission, and he was set at liberty, March 7, 1688. In the new charter of William and Mary, in 1691, he was made one of the Council. He died May 15, 1696, leaving an honored name which his posterity have continued in honor to the present day. " Of all the military commanders of this war I must consider Major Appleton the ablest ; and the tide of warfare in the western towns turned towards safe and successful methods from the time of his appointment to the command. I should place Major Treat, of Connecticut, next to him, and perhaps in the same position he would have been equal." IX. CAPT. ISAAC JOHNSON AND HIS MEN. ISAAC JOHNSON was the son of John, of Roxbury. He was born in England and came to Massachusetts with his father s family, probably in the company with Gov. Winthrop. He was admitted freeman March 4, 1635. He was of the Artillery Company in 1645, and was its captain in 1667. He was ensign of the " Rocksberry " military company previous to 1653, and on June 13th of that year was elected cap tain. He was representative 1671. He married Elizabeth Porter, of Roxbury, January 20, 1637, and had Elizabeth, born Dec. 24, 1637 ; John, bom Nov. 3, 1639, died 1661 ; Mary, born 24 April, 1642 ; Isaac, baptized 7 Jan y, 1644 ; Joseph, baptized 9 Nov., 1645, died soon ; Nathaniel, born 1 May, 1647. The daughter Elizabeth married Henry Bowen, who became lieutenant of his company and was in the Swamp Fight. The Bowens, with many other Roxbury people, removed sometime after 1686 to the township of New Roxbury, granted them by Massachusetts Colony, but was afterwards found to be within the Connecticut bounds and was renamed Woodstock. The eldest son Isaac married Mary Harris and removed to Middle- town, Conn. Isaac s son Joseph inherited his grandfather s Narraganset claim, being then of Woodstock. The captain s daughter Mary married, in 1663, William Bartholomew, and re moved to Branford, Conn. The youngest son, Nathl. Johnson, married Mary Smith in 1667, and sometime after 1683 removed, probably to Marlborough. Through these four surviving children Capt. Johnson s descendants were quite numerous. His widow died 13 Aug., 1683. On the 6th of July, 1675, while the forces under Major Savage were at Mount Hope, Capt. Johnson was sent with a small escort to conduct the fifty-two friendly Indians, raised by Major Gookin, to the army. From the fragment of a letter from Capt. Johnson to the Court, dated at Boston, July 10, 1675, we learn that a company of these Indians was sent back from Mount Hope with him, and that some trouble occurred with one of the oldest, called Tom, at Woodcock s Garrison, where they were resting on the march. This is the letter as it remains. I am not sure that this is not the whole of the letter or statement: 160 KING PHILIP S WAR. Upon the 4 th day of this week being at Woodcockes house and the Inglish and the Indians geting some refreshment and fixing their arms there was one from the oldest of them indians that was sent backe with us from the Army and withdrew himselfe from our Company under the pretence of geting a helve for his hachet but staying long we sent out 6 men to see if they could find him in their search they found his hachet and a new knife : of his and returned without him we being de sirous if it might be to find what had becom of him sent againe 6 men the} could not yet find him, we went to super (that is we seaven Inglish) before it was quite darke and while we were at super the said Tom did make aproach towards the other indians and was deserned by them and som of them called to him (sum say it was one or more of the indian Sentinells called to him) and bid him stand but he would not but fled away upon the which there being sum stire or commosion amongst the indiaus we rose from super and went out they telling us what was the caus of the tumult amongst them ; there was an indian seen as before and now was run away telling of us which way he went I bad them follow and see if they could each him and Woodcock sent out his doggs also they did soone take him and one of the Indians laying hold of him this indiau did strike him on the side of the necke with a hatchet which he had borrowed to get a helve for his owne ; but the indian that was strooke by sum iudians preventing the force of the blow the hurt was small which otherwise might have beene mortall for any thing we know ; we Inglish making all the hast to them we could did rescue the man that is that torn out of the rest of the indians hands as wee did apprehend caus lest he should have beene pulled in peeces or killed by them ; we had him in to Woodcocks hous ; I asked him the reson of his doing after that maner as he did doing as though he intended mischeefe where as he had promised the govenor of the bay he would doe faithful service against phillip and his men ; he answered he was counseled to doe as he did by Samson and another long Island iudian they two indians were called and I asking of them if they did give Tom counsell to doe us hurt or to make trouble amongst us Samson first spake deniug to have given Tom any such counsell ; then the long Island indiau spook denieiug any such thing : upon which said Tom laid two peeces of mony in my hand and told me they each of them gave him one of them peeces to hire hime to do what he did : they bothe denied the giving of him any mony ; woodcoke being by desired he might se the mouy I gave it him ; he says Tom had that mony of him he having soe much lickors of him as cam to 3 d he changed a shilling for the said Tom & gave him a 6 d & a 3 d and that was the 6 d & 3 d which Tom did not denie. I told Tom he pretending soe as he had done to the gover nor as before and marching with us now part of two dayes and serve us thus he did acknowledg he had rebelld & deserved to dye only de sired he might die a quick . . . death by which I doe supose his meaning was that he might not be delivered into the hands of the Indians boston 18 th July 1675 youer honuor 9 Servant ISAAC Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 219. JOHNSON Here we see the prejudice against the Indian blinding the JOHNSON AT NARRAGANSET. 161 captain to the real culprit, Woodcock, whose "lickors" had made the poor savage "crazy drunk." On July 15th, on the news of the attack upon Mendon, Capt. Johnson was sent out with a company to relieve that town, and was joined there by Capt. Prentice and his troop about July 21st. The two captains address letters to the Court July 23d, explain ing the situation of affairs at Mendon ; these letters are lost, but notice of them occurs (Mass. Arch. vol. 67, p. 226) in a Court Order of July 26th, commanding the return of both companies, except a guard to be left at Mendon by Capt. Johnson. Upon the mustering of forces for the Narraganset campaign, Capt. Johnson was placed in command of a company made up of men from Roxbury, Dorchester, Milton, Braintree, Weymouth, Hingham and Hull, seventy-five all told. Eight more were im pressed, but did not appear. The company took part in the memorable march and attack on the fort, as before related, and the brave captain was among the first to fall while gallantly lead ing his men across the fallen tree-trunks at the entrance to the fort. Credited under Capt. Isaac Johnson. August 27 1675 Benjamin Wilson 00 12 00 John Gates 00 12 00 John Barnes 00 12 00 William Gemmison (alias Jamison) 00 12 00 Thomas Hunt 00 12 00 Experience Orris 01 12 00 Richard Cowell 00 12 00 Isaac Johnson Capt. 05 17 03 James Couch 00 12 00 David Landon 00 11 02 John Rugles 00 12 00 Sept. 3 d Ephraim Child 00 12 00 George Walden 00 12 00 Nath Toy 00 12 00 02 00 00 00 Sept. 14 th John Whaley Thomas Wadduck Nov. 30 th John Ireson William Jaques Jan y 25 th 1675-6 Nathaniel Beale 00 February 29 John Langley 01 William Hasey 02 Samuel Lincolne Joshua Lazell March 24 th 1675 Joseph Richards 02 Allin Dugland 00 Thomas Thaxter 02 John Burrell 02 09 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 17 00 00 14 04 01 02 14 16 11 16 14 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 Under Capt Johnson and Capt Jacob March 24 th 1675 Francis Gardnett Ephraim Lane James Read William Mellowes John Whitmarsh John Read James Humphreys John Lovell Isaac Cole 5 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 03 00 00 02 14 00 Isaac Prince 02 14 00 George Vicary 02 09 00 John Bosworth 02 14 00 Christopher Wheaton 02 08 00 Joseph Benson 02 16 00 Isaac Morris 02 14 00 April 24, 1676 John Fenner 00 15 04 William Davenport 02 14 00 162 KING PHILIP S WAR. Under Capt Johnson, June 24 th John Scott Benjamin Bates Samuel Gardner Joseph Goard Nathaniel Wilson Samuel Basse Joseph Tucker Ebenezer Owen William Savell Francis Nash Thomas Copelane Martin Sakins Jonathan Pitcher James Atkins Isaac Johnson Capt. William Lincolne John Watson John Langley 02 14 00 05 02 00 02 16 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 04 01 00 02 14 00 03 12 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 00 12 00 02 14 10 05 11 00 02 09 00 01 16 00 04 00 00 Hezekiah King Henry Bowen Lieut. Ebenezer Hill July 24 John Plum Zachariah Gurny Charles Cahan Onesiphorus Stanly John Spurr August 24 Henry Bartlett Hopestill Humphries Thomas Grant John Watson Sept 23 d John Bull Thomas Davenport 02 19 00 06 03 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 14 00 14 00 02 02 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 00 18 00 00 18 00 00 10 02 The following list of Capt. Johnson s company, made at Ded- ham December 10th, 1675, is preserved in Massachusetts Archives, vol. 67, p. 293. Roxbury, Henry Bowen John Watson W m Lincolne Abiel Lamb John Scot Onesiphorus Stanly Isaack Morrice W m Danforth Joseph Goad Sam 11 Gardiner Nath: Wilson John Hubbard Tho: Baker wanting Thorn: Cheney John Corbin John Newel Dorchester Hen y Mare his man Hopestill Humphrey John Spurre Ebenezer Hill Nicholas Weymouth John Plummer Charles Cahan List of Capt Johnson s Tho: Grant Tho: Davenport Robert Stanton wanting Henry Withington George Minot Isaac Ryall Milton John Fennow Obadiah Wheaten Joseph Tucker Benj. Crane Braintry Ebenezer Owen Sam. Basse W m Sable Tho: Holbrook Rich Thayer Martin Saunders Francis Nash Increase Niles Henry Bartlet Tho: Copeland James Atkins Jonathan Pitcher Company Weymouth Hezek: King Jonas Humphrey Joseph Richards Allin Dugland John Whitmarsh Peeter Gurnay Edward Kingman John Read James Read John Lovet Will Mellis John Hollis John Burril Hinghom Benj. Bates John Jacob John Langley Edward Wilder Tho: Thaxter Ebenezer Lane Sam: Lincolne Ephraim Lane Joshua Lazel John Bull W" Hearsey THE WOUNDED AND SLAIN. 163 Francis Gardiner Nath Beales Nath Nichols Humphrey Johnson wanting W m Woodcock Hull George Vicar John Bosworth Joseph Benson W m Chamberlin Christo: Wheaton Isaack Prince Isaack Cole Henry Chamberlain 75 appeared 8 appeared not The following is preserved in the Mass. Archives, vol. 68, page 104: The names of those soldiers y l Johnson s Comp a December 1675 Capt Isa: Johnson of Roxbury Jonathan Pitcher, Bran ; (Brain- tree) Tho: Davenport Dr (Dorchester) Allin Dugland of Weymouth, 4 slain Jos Watson of Roxbury W m Linckorn of Roxbury were slayne & wounded of Capt John Spur of Dorchester Benj. Crane of Milton Jn Langley of Hingham Jn faxton of Hingham Isaack King of Weymouth Left. Phineas Upham of Maiden wounded eight, and were at Road Island Jan. 6 th 1675-6 Upon the death of Capt. Johnson and the mortal wound of Lieut. Upham, the command of that company devolved upon Ensign, afterwards Lieut., Henry Bowen. After the battle, it would appear that Capt. John Jacob of Hingham was appointed to the command of the company, as many of the credits show his vouchers in the account. X. CAPT. JOSEPH GARDINER AND HIS MEN. TOSEPH GARDINER (or Gardner) was the son of Thomas and *J Margaret Gardner of Salem. He married, before August, 1656, Anne Downing, daughter of Emanuel Downing and niece of the first Gov. Winthrop. He was a man of energy and ability, and held many positions of honor and importance in Salem. In May, 1672, he was appointed by the General Court of Massachusetts lieutenant of the foot company under Capt. William Price of Salem. On May 12, 1675, the militia of Salem was divided into two companies by order of the Court, and by the same order the elec tion of Joseph Gardiner as captain of the First Company in Salem was confirmed. When the expedition against Narraganset was organized, Capt. Gardiner was appointed, November 3, 1675, to command the company raised at Salem and the adjoining towns, and mustered his men, ninety-five strong, at Dedham Plain De cember 10th, and marched with the army towards the rendezvous at Wickford. During the march several skirmishes took place, and Mr. Hubbard relates that some of Stone-wall-John s crew "met with some of Capt. Gardiner s men that were stragling about their own business contrary to order, and slew his Sergeant with one or two more." In " Capt. Oliver s Narrative " it is re lated that on this occasion the Indians " killed two Salem men within a mile of our quarters and wounded a third so that he is dead." The names of these are given in the list below. The fall of Capt. Gardner is thus related in Church s " Entertaining- History:" Mr. Church spying Capt. Gardner of Salem amidst the Wigwams in the East end of the Fort, made towards him ; but on a sudden while they were looking each other in the face, Capt. Gardner settled down, Mr. Church stepped to him, and seeing the blood run down his cheek lifted up his cap and calling him by name, he looked up in his face but spake not a word, being mortally Shot through the head. After the death of Capt. Gardiner, the command of his com pany fell upon his lieutenant, William Hathorn, under whom CAPT. GARDINER S COMPANY. 165 the men served during the campaign, until disbanded in Febru ary. It is thus that the men were credited sometimes under Gar diner, sometimes Hathorn, occasionally both ; the latter s name, signed to the voucher or " debenter " which each soldier presented to the paymaster, doubtless confused the clerk and caused this appearance of double command. Capt. Hathorn s subsequent career at the eastward will be given in its proper place. Capt. Gardiner s widow, then aged about thirty-four, married June 6, 1676, Gov. Simon Bradstreet, whose age was about seventy-three. She died April 19, 1713, aged 79. Leaving no children, Capt. Gardiner s Narraganset claim fell to the oldest male heir of his eldest brother Thomas. This heir was Habakkuk Gardiner, son of the Captain s nephew Thomas, who in the list of claimants claims in the " right of his uncle, Capt. Joseph Gardiner." Capt. Joseph Gardiner and his men. February 29 th 1675 & 6 "William Hathorne, Capt. 1 1 Samuel Gray Peter Gary Jeremiah Neall Peter Cole Joseph Price Samuel Tarbox Sam. Beadle Benjamin Hooper Rice Husband Marke Stacy William Hollis John Clark Thomas Weyinouth William Hutchins Christopher Read William Bassett Samuel Graves John Farrington William Driver Andrew Townsend Jonathan Looke Charles Knight John Prince Andrew Sargeant Edward Haradine John Trask Joseph Houlton Isaac Welman William Pritchett John Maston Benjamin Chadwell Stephen Greenleaf & 6 Amos Gurdon 02 14 10 s. d, Peter Emons 02 14 10 11 09 08 William Webb 02 14 00 03 06 07 Robert Sibly 02 14 00 02 14 00 Andrew Ringe 05 08 00 04 18 00 Benjamin Langdon 03 00 00 02 14 00 James Briarly 04 01 00 01 13 00 Benjamin Webster 02 14 00 03 09 03 Freegrace Norton 03 12 00 04 01 00 Israel Thome 02 14 00 02 14 00 Ezekiel Woodward 02 04 00 02 14 00 John Wheeler 05 08 00 02 14 00 William Wainwright 02 14 00 02 18 00 John Boutell 00 18 00 01 14 00 Jonathan Clark 02 14 00 02 14 00 William Williams 02 14 00 02 07 00 Samuel Rust 04 01 00 02 14 00 Benjamin Sweet, Lieut. 03 00 00 05 04 04 Henry Dow 01 16 00 02 14 00 Silvester Hayes 03 03 00 02 02 00 Thomas Tenney 02 14 00 02 14 00 Joseph Jewett 02 14 00 02 14 00 John Boynton 02 14 00 02 14 00 Peter Coomes 03 08 00 03 03 00 Jonathan Copp 01 04 00 03 15 08 John Mann 02 04 00 02 19 02 March 24 th 1675-6 02 19 02 John Vowden 02 14 00 02 17 08 Lawrence Majore 02 14 00 02 14 00 Thomas Flynt 02 16 00 02 14 00 Thomas Greene 02 14 00 02 14 00 John Read 02 14 00 02 14 00 Adam Gold 02 14 00 02 14 00 Zacheus Perkins 02 14 00 01 10 00 William Pabody 02 14 00 166 KING PHILIP S WAR. Joseph Gardiner, Capt. 05 03 00 Amos Gourdin 01 04 00 James Fry 02 14 00 Daniel Johnson 03 10 00 Leonard Toser 02 14 00 Jeremiah Neale, Lieut. 03 00 00 April 24 th 1676 August 24 th 1676 Thomas Keuny 02 14 00 Edward Counter 02 14 00 John Stacy 02 14 00 Ebenezer Barker 02 02 00 June 24 th 1676. Thomas Rpssell 02 14 00 Francis Jefford 02 14 00 Joseph Jeffords 01 09 00 Samuel Phelpes 02 14 00 Thomas Vely 02 05 00 John Presson 02 14 00 Eleazer Linsey 01 16 00 Joseph Abbott 02 14 00 Thomas Bell 04 05 08 Samuel Pickworth 00 11 06 Sept 23 d 1676 Abraham Snitchell 01 01 00 Mark Bachelor 00 14 00 Michael Towsley 02 15 08 Robert Cocks 02 02 00 Thomas Kemball 02 14 00 Moses Morgaine 02 14 00 Thomas Blashfield 02 14 00 William Allen 02 14 00 Credited under Capt. Hathorne. Edward Whittington 02 14 00 Samuel Story 04 05 08 John Parker 02 14 00 Peter Ashamaway 04 05 08 Philip Butler 02 14 00 Jacob Knight 01 10 00 James Wall 04 10 10 William Wainwright 04 16 06 John Ballard 02 14 00 Samuel Moulton 01 04 00 July 24, 1676 James Creeke 04 04 00 William Hathorne, Capt . 07 03 09 James Cox 04 05 00 A list of y e names of Capt. Gardiner s Souldiers for this p sent Expedition Salem. Serjeant Jeremiah Neall Serjeant William bassett Ser Samuel bradell Corp. Samuell Pikworth Chaiis Knight John boden William holess Marck Stace Samuell Gray Larance Magery John Polott Philip butteler Benimen Lemon Edward Counter Lenard Tossier William Hind Joseph Price Th Flint Pelter Prescote Isack Read Tho. Bufflngtog John Stacey Henery Rich Tho. Greene James Wall Joseph Holton jun r Tho. Reny Joseph Dees wounded Abraham Switchell Samuell ffrail not apearing ffrances Jefford Clem. Rumeall Adam Gold Samuell Tarbox Marblehead. Petter Coll Henry Codner Auguster fferker David Shapligh Petter Gary Robertt Cooks Edward Severy Ephraim Jones Lenerd Belinger Philip Brock Thomas Weymouth ) These men Thomas Weymouth > wanting of Thomas Russell ) their Comp y CAPT. GARDINER S COMPANY. 167 Topsfield. William Peabody Zacheus Curtis Zacheus Perkins Robertt Andrews Isek burton Andover. Nathan Stevens James Fry Eben barker John Parker Joseph Abett John balard John Lovejoy Edward Whittingtou Samuell Philips John P r ston Gloster. John Prince Andrew Serjant Joseph Somes Vinesont Davis Moses duday Beverly. Christopher Brown John Trask Thomas Blashfield Lott Cunant Christopher Read William fferyman Moses Morgine John Clark William Allen William bath Richard Hussband Lyn. Nicholas Huchin John Linsey Robert driver Daniell Huchin John Davis Samuell Graves Andrew townsend Thomas baker Johnathan Looke Iseck Welman Isaack Hartt John Farington Samul Rods Mark Bacheler Richard Hutten Thomas Kemball Philip Welsh John Hunkens Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 93. 4 men Slayne more A Lyst of Capt Joseph Gardiner Company y were wounded and Slayne of his Company, some y e 16 Dec r & Other 19 th dec 75 Joseph Rice of Salem 1 a ^ , TVI f o i f wch. 3 were slayne .... Samuel Pikeworth of Salem > , -, ,. J -n/rri T> * KM f -HIT- C abroad from y e garrison M r ke Batchiler of Wenham ) J Capt Joseph Gardiner of Salem Abra. Switchell of Marblehead Joseph Soames of Cape Anne Robert Andrews of Topsfield Charles Knight of Salem Nicholas Huchins of Lynn Thomas flint of Salem Jn Harrington of Lynne Robert Cocks of Marblehead Eben Baker (Barker) of Andiver Edw d Mardin of Cape Ann Joseph Read of Beverly Joseph Abett of Andiver Joseph Holeton of Salem Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 104. 10 men wounded XL CAPT. NATHANIEL DAVENPORT AND HIS MEN. CAPT. NATHANIEL DAVENPORT was born in Salem, Mass., and was the son of Richard Davenport and his wife Elizabeth Hathorn. Richard came to Salem with Endicott in 1628, from Weymouth in Dorsetshire, was admitted freeman September 3, 1634, was ensign in the local militia same year, and in 1637 served as lieutenant in the Pequod expedition, where he was wounded. He was representative in 1637, and joined the Artillery Company in 1639. Removed to Boston in 1642 and was appointed captain of the Castle, which post he filled for many years, and was there killed by lightning on July 15, 1665. His children were Nathaniel ; Truecross, born 1634-5 ; Experi ence, baptized August 27, 1637 ; John, baptized September 19, 1641, at Salem ; and at Boston he had Samuel, baptized June 28, 1656 ; Sarah, September 30, 1649 ; Elizabeth, September 13, 1652; William, born May 11, 1656. The widow died June 28, 1678. Nathaniel spent his boyhood and youth at Salem and at the Castle. He was evidently a man of enterprise and ability, and for some time was concerned with several Boston men in an ex tensive business between Boston and New York. He married Elizabeth Thacher, daughter of Thomas. From his early surroundings at the Castle he naturally ac quired experience of military matters, and his business pursuits gave him wide acquaintance with the affairs of the colonies in their commercial relations. In the difficulties with the Dutch at New York he was evidently a trusted agent of Massachusetts, his residence for some time in New York giving him great advantage. In volume II. " New York Colonial History " are found letters passing between Edward Rawson, Secretary of Massachusetts, and N. Bayard, Secretary of " New Netherlands," showing that in 1673 Mr. Nathaniel Davenport and Mr. Arthur Mason were sent by the Massachusetts Colony to demand the restoration of some vessels which had been seized by the N. N. government, and they threatened reprisal, etc., if the vessels were not given up. In a later letter of Bayard to Rawson in DAVENPORT AT NABBAGANSET. 169 regard to this demand, he refers to Mr. Davenport as a " spy." His experience and prominence would thus seem to mark him as a leader in the war, but it is evident that his residence abroad had precluded his holding military office in the colony, where the choice was made by the people of each town, and was made a matter of confirmation by the Court. Capt. Davenport had returned to Boston in 1673, and at the time of the fitting out of the Narraganset Expedition in December, 1675, was serving on the jury at the Court of Assistants, whence he was summoned to take command of the 5th Company in the Massachusetts Regi ment. This company was made up chiefly of men from Cam bridge and Watertown, to most of whom Captain Davenport was a stranger ; but it is said that he, on the occasion of " taking pos session of his company, made a very civil speech to them, and also gave them free Liberty to choose their own Serjeants them selves, which pleased them very well, and accordingly did so." The company joined the rest of the forces at Dedham plain, and marched to Narraganset with the army. In " Oliver s Narra tive," one item concerning Capt. Davenport appears, mentioned with characteristic brevity. " Dec. 17 th That Day we sold Capt. Davenport forty-seven Indians young and old, for Eighty Pounds in money." I have found nothing to solve the doubt as to whether it was the enterprise of the merchant or the humanity of the man that prompted the purchase. I find no mention of such sale on the treasurer s books. On December 19th, at the great Fort fight, Mr. Hubbard relates that " Capt. Mosely and Capt. Davenport led the van." The death of Capt. Davenport is thus related in the " Old Indian Chronicle" above mentioned, p. 181: Before our men came up to take possession of the Fort, the Indians had shot three Bullets through Capt. Davenport, whereupon he bled ex- treamly, and immediately called for his Lieutenant, Mr. Edward Ting, and committed the charge of the Company to him, and desired him to take care of his Gun, and deliver it according to Order and immediately died in his Place. . . . And it is very probable the Indians might think Capt Davenport was the General because he had a very good Buff Suit on at that Time and therefore might shoot at him. Capt. Davenport left no children, and his nephew, Addington Davenport, inherited his Narraganset claim. Lieutenant Edward Ting (or Tyng) commanded the company during the rest of this campaign, and many of the credits are given under him as Captain. He was the son of Capt. Edward Tyng of Boston, and was born March 26th, 1649. He removed to Falmouth in 1680, and soon after married Elizabeth, daughter of Thaddeus Clark and great-granddaughter of George Cleeves. He was in command of Fort Loyal 1680 and 1681 ; was a counsellor and magistrate for Maine under President Danforth, and in 1686 170 KING PHILIP S WAR. was appointed by the King one of the council of his brother-in- law Joseph Dudley, and afterward under Andros, who made him lieutenant-colonel and placed him in command in the province of Sagadahoc in 1688 and 1689, and after the reduction of Nova Scotia was appointed governor of Annapolis, but on his way to that place his vessel was captured by the French, and he was taken to France, where he died. He was a man of great energy and ability, and was a large land-owner in Maine ; but as he favored and served the Andros party, became very unpopular with the people. Credited under Capt. Nath 1 Davenport & Capt. Ting, February 29 th 1675-6 Nathaniel Sanger 02 14 00 Timothy Rice 02 14 00 Thomas Hall 02 14 00 James Smith 02 14 00 John Cutler 02 14 00 Jacob Bullard 02 14 00 Caleb Simons 02 02 00 Matthew Gibbs 02 14 00 William Peirce 02 14 00 June 24 th 1676 John Baldwin 00 10 03 Joshuah Woods 02 14 00 Nathaniel Damport Capt.05 07 00 Daniel Woodward 02 14 00 Theoder Atkins 00 15 00 James Haughton 00 19 08 Edward Ting Capt. 11 13 06 Abraham Temple 02 02 00 Gershom Cutler (Cutter) 02 14 00 David Batchelor 01 18 06 Thomas [Nicho]ls 02 14 00 Ambros Mackfassett 02 14 00 Stephen Farr 02 14 00 Jonathan Remington 10 18 08 Samuel Lamson 03 07 00 Peter Bateman 02 08 00 John Shelden 04 13 00 Samuel Dvmon 02 14 00 Moses Whitny 02 14 00 John Taylor 02 14 00 Jonathan Smith 02 14 00 John Wood 02 14 00 Joseph Smith 02 14 00 Zachariah Snow 02 02 00 Daniel Wan-in 03 03 00 Isaac Emsden " als Alms- Isaac Lerned 01 15 02 den " 03 06 06 Thomas Parker 00 18 00 William Gleson 02 14 00 John Polly 02 14 00 Samuel How 02 12 02 William Roberts 02 14 00 Thomas Brown 02 02 00 John Baker 00 10 03 John Salter 02 14 00 Joshua Bigalo 02 14 00 Jacob Amsden 02 14 00 March 24 th 1675-6 Jeremiah Toy 02 14 00 Joseph Buss 03 03 00 George Hay ward 00 12 00 John Wheeler 02 14 00 Dennis Hedly 02 14 00 Nathaniel Healy 02 02 00 July 24 th 1676 George Herington 02 14 00 Joseph Wheeler 02 09 00 William Wade 02 14 00 John Baker 05 05 00 Thomas Rutter 02 14 00 John Parker 02 14 00 John Haws 00 18 00 James Mathewes 01 09 00 Samuel Swan 03 00 00 August 24 th 1676 John Drury D 04 05 10 John Priest 03 10 00 William Price 02 14 00 Nicholas Lunn 02 12 00 April 24th 1676 Jonathan Lawrence 02 14 00 John White 02 14 00 CAPT. DAVENPORT S SOLDIERS. 171 The following is preserved in the Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 104: 4 men Slayne 11 men wounded The List of those y* were slayne & wounded of Cap Nath 1 Daven port Capt. Nath: Davenport Sarg Theod r Atkinson 1 George Howard of Concord Jn Hagar of Watertown 1 Sam. Swayn of Cambridge Sam. Read of Cambridge Sam. Stocker of Meadford Nath Healy of Watertowne Isaac Learned of Watertowne Tho. Browne of Concord Abra: Temple of Concord David Batchelor of Redding Caleb Symon 8 of Ooburne John Backer of Wooborne Zachary Snow of Wooborn The following lists of men impressed in several towns where Capt. Davenport s company was raised will serve to identify many of the names. Of course, many of those impressed were either excused for disability or escaped from the service in some other manner. See Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 100, and for separate lists, pp. 67-100. The returns were dated from Nov. 25 to Dec. 3, 1675. From Cambridge. Corp 11 Jonathan Remington James Hubbart Edward Win ship juni or Isaack Emsden Nathaniel Patten William Glesson John Withe Jacob Emsden Jonathan Laurenc John Emsden John Salter Samuel Swan Daniel Woodward Samuel Read Gershom Cutter 15 From Watertown. Daniell Warrin, S r John Bigulah, S r Nathaniell Hely Joseph Tayntor J r John Whettney S r George Herrington James Cutting. William Hagar Jr John Parkhurst Michaell Flegg Jacob Bullard Isaack Learned Joseph Waight George Dill Jonathan Smith Willyam Price Jr Nathaniell Sangar Moses Whettny Enoch Sawtell John Bright John Hastings John Bacon John Chadwick John Wiudam Ben Douse Nath Barsham John Barnard 1 la the credits these appear as Hay ward and Swan. 172 KING PHILIP S WAR. Ephraim Gearffield Joseph Smith 29 From W oburri. John Carter William Johnson James Convars John Cutler William Peirce John Baker Zachariah Snow John Polly John Preist John Berbeane John Shilden Thomas Hale John Bolen Caleb Simons Peter Bateman Jerimiah Hood 16 From Sudbury. William Wade. Samuell Bush John White Jun r Tho. Rutter Peter Hopes Jr James Smith Dennis Hedley Matthew Gibbs Ju r Daniel Herrington 9 From Cambridge Village. Samuell Hides Jr Peter Henchet Joshua Woods Jonathan Bush 4 From Reading. Samuel Lamson David Bachelder James Carr Samuel Daman Seabred Taylor Thomas Nichols William Robards Nicholas Lunn 8 From Meadford. James Stokes Jeremiah Toy 2 From Concord. Joseph Busse Abraham Temple Samuel How John Wood Joseph Wheeler Thomas Browne John Wheeler Timothy Rice George Hayward Stephen Farre John Taylor 11 Capt. Davenport s company numbered seventy-five men. Sub stitutes often appear instead of those impressed. Fifty-seven in the above list, and three besides among the wounded and killed, are thus accounted for. Some of the rest received credit in a later Ledger. XII. CAPT. JAMES OLIVER AND HIS MEN. JAMES OLIVER was the son of Thomas and Ann, who came from England in the ship " William and Francis " (by another account the Lion) 9 March, 1632, with their family of six sons and two daughters. Bristol, Somersetshire, is said to have been the old home of the family. They settled in Boston, where the father became ruling elder and of wide influence in the affairs of the new town. He died June 1, 1658, aged ninety years, according to John Hull s Diary, leaving sons who held places of honor and trust in the colony, and whose posterity, in successive generations to the present, have held the name honorably. James was admitted freeman 12 October, 1640. Was of the Artillery Company, and chosen Ensign 1651, Lieutenant 1653, Captain 1656 and again 1666. Was chosen selectman of the town in 1653 and served several years ; was also an inspector of the port and a merchant of eminence. He was of the First Mili tary Company of Boston, and was elected Captain probably in 1673. He was appointed to command a Boston company in the Narraganset campaign. His appointment was dated November 17, 1675, and men to fill this company were impressed from the several town companies, including his own, as is seen by the second list below. Taking command of his company, he joined the army at Dedham Plain and took part in the subsequent movements of the campaign, being one of the few fortunate officers who passed through the great Swamp Fight unscathed, and remained in command of his company until the return and dismissal at Boston February 5th, 1675-6. While the army was at Narraganset, at the Garrison House of Mr. Richard Smith (their rendezvous after the great fight, now embraced in the town of Wickford, R.I.), Capt. Oliver wrote the following account 1 of the campaign, the original of which 1 The letter, as here given, is taken from the foot-notes of Gov. Hutchinson s History of Massa chusetts, vol. i. p. 300, of first and second editions, and 272 of the third edition. Mr. Hutchinson said there was no signature, and attributes it to Major Bradford, but a simple comparison with Hubbard s Munt shows the author to have been Capt. Oliver, and this conclusion is rendered certain by M?; Drake (" Book of the Indians," p. 219, foot-note), who had seen the original, signed James Oliver, and found this, which appears in Mr. Hutchinson s notes "correct in the main particulars," when compared with the original. He thought Mr. Hutchinson used a copy without signature, as must have been the case; and I would suggest that copy was made by Mr. Hubbard for his own use in compiling his history, and was found among his papers which Mr. Hutchinsou used extensively in his work. It is to be regretted that Mr. Drake did not speak more definitely about the original, or better still, publish It in some one of his many works. Mr. Drake refers to it as " Capt. Oliver s Narrative." Is the original now in existence? 174 KING PHILIP S WAR. I have failed to find trace of, after diligent search and in quiry. The letter, as published by Gov. Hutchinson, is as follows : Narraganset 26 th 11 th month 1675 After a tedious march in a bitter cold night that followed Dec. 1 2 th , we hoped our pilot would have led us to Pomham by break of day, but so it came to pass we were misled and so missed a good opportunity. Dec. 13 th , we came to Mr. Smith s, and that day took 35 prisoners. Dec. 14 th , our General went out with horse and foot, I with my com pany was left to keep garrison. I sent out 30 of my men to scout abroad, who killed two Indians and brought in 4 prisoners, one of which was beheaded. Our Army came home at night, killed 7 and brought in 9 more, young and old. Dec. 15 th , came in John, a rogue, with pretence of peace, and was dismissed with this errand, that we might speak with Sachems. That evening, he not being gone a quarter of an hour, his company that lay hid behind a hill killed two Salem men within a mile of our quarters, and wounded a third that he is dead. And at a house three miles off where I had 10 men, they killed 2 of them. Instantly, Capt Mosely, myself and Capt Gardner were sent to letch in Major Appleton s company that kept 3 miles and an half off, and coming, they lay behind a stone wall and fired on us in sight of the garrison. We killed the captain that killed one of the Salem men, and had his cap on. That night they burned Jerry Bull s house, and killed 17. Dec. 16 th came that news. Dec. 17 th came news that Con necticut forces were at Petaquamscot, and had killed 4 Indians and took 6 prisoners. That day we sold Capt. Davenport 47 Indians, young and old for 801. in money. Dec. 18 th we marched to Petaquamscot with all our forces, only a garrison left ; that night was very stormy ; we lay, one thousand, in the open field that long night. In the morning, Dec. 19 th , Lord s day, at 5 o clock we marched. Between 12 and 1 we came up with the enemy, and had a sore fight three hours. We lost, that are now dead, about 68, and had 150 wounded, many of which are recovered. That long snowy cold night we had about 18 miles to our quarters, with about 210 dead and wounded. We left 8 dead in the fort. We had but 12 dead when we came from the swamp, besides the 8 we left. Many died by the way, and as soon as they were brought in, so that Dec. 20 th we buried in a grave 34, next day 4, next day 2, and none since here. Eight died at Rhode Island, 1 at Petaquam scot, 2 lost in the woods and killed, Dec. 20, as we heard since ; some say two more died. By the best intelligence, we killed 300 fighting men ; prisoners we took, say 350, and above 300 women and children. We burnt above 500 houses, left but 9, burnt all their corn, that was in baskets, great store. One signal mercy that night, not to be for gotten, viz. that when we drew off, with so many dead and wounded, they did not pursue us, which the young men would have done, but the sachems would not consent; they had but 10 pounds of powder left. Our General, with about 40, lost our way, and wandered till 7 o clock in the morning, before we came to our quarters. We thought we were within 2 miles of the enemy again, but God kept us ; to him be the glory. We have killed now and then 1 since, and burnt 200 wigwams CAPT. OLIVER S LETTER. 175 more ; we killed 9 last Tuesday. We fetch in their corn daily and that undoes them. This is, as nearly as I can, a true relation. I read the narrative to my officers in my tent, who all assent to the truth of it. Monhegins and Pequods proved very false, fired into the air, and sent word before they came they would so, but got much plunder, guns and kettles. A great part of what is written was attested by Joshua Teffe, who married an Indian woman, a Wampanoag. He shot 20 times at us in the swamp, was taken at Providence Jan y 14, brought to us the 16 th , executed the 18 th . A sad wretch, he never heard a sermon but once these 14 years. His father, going to recall him lost his head and lies unburied. This letter shows something of the well-known sympathy of Capt. Oliver with the popular party which at that time so bitterly opposed all concessions towards the Indians, and denounced even their most trusted magistrates and ministers, like Major Gookin and Rev. John Eliot, who sought to protect the friendly or " Christian " Indians from persecution. On one occasion many of these had been seized and imprisoned (by Capt. Mosely, as has been related) at Boston, awaiting trial. On Sept. 10th, at 9 o clock at night, a mob collected, and presuming upon Capt. Oliver s sympathy, went to his house and proposed that he should lead them and take one of the Indians out of the prison and hang him; but the Captain, boiling with rage at this insult to him self, "cudgelled them stoutly" with his cane from his house. Capt. Oliver married, between 1641 and 1655, Mary, widow of John Frend and daughter of Thomas Dexter, who died before he did, and left no issue to him ; at his death in 1682, two of his nephews, John and Nathaniel Oliver, administered upon his estate, and his nephew, Daniel Oliver, Esq., inherited his Narraganset claim. In a petition to the Court, May 19, 1680, he states that he has served town and country many years, at home and abroad, and hath spent therein the prime of his strength and estate, and later much of what was left to him was consumed by fire, and now being aged and infirm in body, prays to be dismissed from further service as captain of the town company, and also that the Court, in view of his decay, grant to him " the Island whereon the Indian Wianenset lately dwelt lying neer Dunstable," etc. In answer to this the Deputies passed a vote : " Considering the petitioner s present Incapacity of getting a livelyhud by Reson of his Lameness," etc., and " y he dweling with his kinsman Nathaniel Barns, Doe for the Relife of y petitioner, give and grant unto s d Barns, his heires and Assignes forever, a small Island of upland Containing about twenty acres (more or less) w ch lyeth in Merimak River near to Mr Jonathan Tings farme, w ch Island hath been Commonly Caled & knowne by y name of Tinker s Island," etc. Mass Archives, vol. 45, p. 174. See also vol. 70, p. 47. 176 KING PHILIP S WAR. The magistrates did not concur in the grant while consenting to the dismissal, but appointed a committee, Capt. Samuel Adams of Chelmsford and Lieut. William Johnson of Woburn, to see if the Island was included in any former grant. I have not found their report, but Barnes was granted, " Oct. 1681 two hundred acres of land where it is to be found not prejudiciall to any new plantation." See Colonial Records, vol. v, pp. 278-9 and 331. The following are in Hull s Journal : Credited under Capt. James Oliver : February 29 th 1675 Richard Baruam 00 12 04 Ezekiel Gilman 03 03 00 Joseph Bemish 02 14 00 Alexander Boyle 03 00 00 John Harwood 00 18 00 Richard Cowell 03 03 00 Aaron Steevens 02 15 06 Daniel East 03 03 00 Thomas Stanes 02 14 00 Thomas Hunt 02 14 00 April 24, 1676. David Landon 02 14 00 William Backaway 02 14 00 James Couch 02 14 00 James Harrington 02 14 00 John Cann 02 14 00 William Dinsdell 02 14 00 Samuel Measy 02 14 00 Gamaliel Rogers 02 14 00 Richard Read 02 19 00 James Harris 02 10 06 Jeffery Jefferies 02 14 00 Henry Critchett 04 10 10 Patrick Moroone 02 14 00 Roger Brown 02 14 00 Thomas Warren 02 14 00 William Madrill 02 14 00 William Baker 02 14 00 Mark Round 02 14 00 Rowland Boulter 02 14 00 John Crooke 02 14 00 John Kendall 02 14 00 June 24, 1676. Josiah Belcher 02 14 00 Daniel Clough 02 14 00 Robert Emans 02 14 00 John Verin 02 14 00 Alexander McKenney 02 14 00 Ephraim Turner Lieut. 07 01 06 Samuel Jenkins 00 18 00 Benjamin Pickering \ 02 14 00 Thomas Hansett 03 00 00 Henry Kerby 02 14 00 John Casey 03 00 00 Gilbert Foresight 02 14 00 John King 03 03 00 James Knott 02 14 00 James Lindall 03 03 00 Joseph Barber 02 14 00 Samuel Lane 02 14 00 John Wilkins 02 14 00 March 24 th 1675-6 July 24 th 1676 Thomas Bingly 04 01 00 William Kemball 02 14 00 Thomas Brown 00 06 10 Roger Prosser 02 14 00 Thomas Burch 02 14 00 August 24 , 1676 Richard Drue 03 13 Richard House 02 14 00 Joseph Knight 04 01 00 Sept. 23 d 1676 Alexander Forbs 00 12 00 Ralph Powell 02 14 00 Henry Timber-lake 03 12 00 Archabald Forrest 02 14 00 The following list, which contains the names of those impressed out of the various Boston companies for this service, under Cap tain Oliver, will be found different in several respects from the credit list above. In the credits but sixty-one names appear, while among the slain and wounded are four more, making, with CAPT. OLIVER S SOLDIERS. 177 the Captain, sixty-six. In the second list there are seventy-nine in all and thirty-one not credited in Hull. Many of these latter are doubtless boys and substitutes, as appears in the list of slain and wounded, where so many are "Servants" (i.e.) apprentices probably. There are fourteen names in Hull s list not found in the second. In the official muster at Dedham Plain Capt. Oliver s company numbers eighty-three. The discrepancy would doubt less be explained had we the later journal of Mr. Hull s accounts. The Boston companies are designated by the names of their captains, and the numbers accompanying each denote the number of men from each. A List of the Souldiers und r Command of Capt. James Olliver. Imprimis Capt. Ollivers, 17 Capt. James Olliver Lieut. Turner Tho. Bingley Serg Benuitt Serg Ingram Serg 1 Timberleys Serg Meares Charles Lidgett James Butler James Coutch Mr Symon Lynds W m Midleton Rich: Crispe Will: Douglis Natt: Ellkin Rich: Burford James Lendall Major Savidge, 7 Will" 1 Elliott Jn Brigs Jo: Knight Sam 11 Laine Patraick Moraine Gilbert fforesyth Jn Kendall Major Clark, 12 Will: Blackwell Splande Decroe Mass. Archives, Tho: Burch Henry Timberley Henry Kerbee Joseph Wakfeild Will" 1 Kemble Will" 1 Backua Rich: Travis Peter Ingsbee Will: Drue Jn Allen Cap 1 Hudson, 9 Gamaliell Rodgers Tho: Brown Dan 11 East Roger Procer Jn ffeilder James Thomas David Landon Will" 1 Dinsdell Jn Wilkins Cpt. Richards, 10 Ezekiell Gillman Jn Cann Dan 11 Cluff Eliezar Gilbert Hugh Prize Will: Madareell Henry Crittchitt Marke Rounds Jo n Bevis vol. 68, p. 95. Will" 1 Dolliver C. Hinchman, 6 James Whippo Sam" Jenkins Tho: Staiues Jn Verin Rob Emins Ralph Powell Cp l Clark, 8 Rowland Bowlter Tho. Hunt Jefery Jeffers Aron Stevens Houell Davis James Harrington Rich: Drue Rich: Cowell Cp f Hull, 10 James Harris Allexander Bogell W m Baker Archibell fforest Josiah Bellcher Dan" Harris Henry Lizonby J n Hudson Jn" Case Jn Cleares 178 KING PHILIP S WAR. A List of y e Slayne & wounded in Capt Olliver s. 19 th of December, 1675 Thomas Broune for Paul Bat of Boston Alexander fforbes Splende Decree Serv 1 to Dani, ^ 5 men Slayne. James Thomas Hen: Hall, for Mr Ligett, lost Sarg 1 Peter Bennet Sarg Timberley James Lendall 7 men W m Kemble Serv 1 to Jn Cleere wounded and Ezekiel Oilman are at Marke Rounds Serv 1 to Hen: Kemble Road Hand. Alexander Bogell John Casey Servant to Tho: Gardiner, Muddy River. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, pp. 103-4 Besides these, many more were disabled from active service, from the cold and exposure. EPHRAIM TURNER, Capt. Oliver s lieutenant in this ex pedition, was the son of Robert Turner, who came to Boston, September 4, 1633, in the ship Griffin, with Rev. John Cotton. Robert is styled "Vintner" in the deed of April 1, 1652, from Richard Fairbanks, conveying the estate upon which, he rebuilt or enlarged the house where he established the famous hostlery known as the " Blue Anchor Tavern " for more than fifty years. The " Boston Daily Globe," April 2, 1885, whose building now occupies the site of the ancient hostlery, published a very interest ing account, by William R. Bagnell, of the successive buildings and residents that have occupied the premises. Among the occupants was Gen. Henry Knox. Of this Robert, the vintner and innholder, and his wife Penelope, Ephraim, the eldest son, was born December 13, 1639; of the Artillery Company 1663, freeman 1666, Ensign in Capt. Oliver s company at home from 1675 to 1680, when he was relieved of the office at his request. He married Sarah Phillips, daughter of Major William, of Charles- town, Boston and Saco, and through her came into possession of large tracts of land in what is now Saridford, Alfred and Water- boro . The children of Ephraim and Sarah, born in Boston, were Derlow, born Dec. 3, 1663 ; Robert, born June 17, 1665 ; Sarah, born March 24, 1666-7 ; Abigail, born June 8, 1669 ; Ephraim, born Nov. 23, 1670 ; Elizabeth, born August 19, 1672 ; Deliver ance, born August 1, 1673. Mr. T. Larkin Turner, of North Weymouth, who has thoroughly investigated the various branches of the Turner family, and has kindly assisted in the above sketch, informs me that he has found nothing relative to Ephraim Turner subsequent to 1680-1, and thinks he must have removed from town. XIII. THE NARRAGANSET CAMPAIGN TO THE CLOSE OF THE "SWAMP FORT" BATTLE. PREPARATIONS AND MARCH AGAINST THE NARRAGANSETS. AFTER their somewhat disastrous campaign of the autumn of 1675 in the western parts of the colony of Massachusetts, the United Colonies, upon information that the hostile Indians with Philip were retiring towards the south and to winter quarters amongst the Narragansets, determined to carry the war against this powerful tribe, who for some time had shown them selves actively hostile. The veteran troops were recalled and reorganized; small towns in various parts of the colonies were garrisoned, and an army of one thousand men was equipped for a winter campaign. General Josiah Winslow, Governor of Plymouth Colony, was appointed commander-in-chief of this Army ; Major Samuel Appleton to command the Massachusetts Regiment, Major William Bradford that of Plymouth, and Major Robert Treat that of Connecticut. War was formally declared against the Narragansets on November 2d, 1675, in the meeting of the Commissioners of the United Colonies held at Boston. General Winslow, upon his appointment to the command of the army in this expedition, went to Boston for consultation with Gov. Leverett and the Council. Thence on Thursday, December the 9th, he rode to Dedham, having Benjamin Church as aid, and probably the gentlemen who constituted the Massachusetts part of his staff or " guard," consisting of the ministers, among whom was Mr. Joseph Dudley, and the surgeons, of whom the chief was Daniel Weld, of Salem. I presume other general officers and aids went along with him, of whom we find no mention. Com missary John Morse was probably of this number. The General assumed command of the Massachusetts forces drawn up on Dedham Plain, and formally delivered to him by Major General Denison of Massachusetts, on Thursday, December 9th. This force consisted of six companies of foot, numbering four hundred and sixty-five, besides Captain Prentice s troop of seventy-five. The full quota of Massachusetts was five hundred and twenty-seven soldiers, but there were doubtless many others along as servants 180 KING PHILIP S WAK. to the officers, scouts, and teamsters. To the soldiers a proclama tion was made at this time, on the part of the Massachusetts Council, " that if they played the man, took the Fort, & Drove the Enemy out of the Narragansett Country, which was their great Seat, that they should have a gratuity in land besides their wages." On the same afternoon they marched twenty-seven miles to Woodcock s Garrison, now Attleboro . In the evening of Friday, December 10th, they arrived at Seekonk, where vessels with supplies were in waiting. And here also Major Richard Smith was waiting their arrival with his vessel, and took on board Capt. Mosely and his company, to sail direct to his garrison- house at Wickford. Some others, it is likely, went with them to arrange for quartering the troops, and Benjamin Church was sent to make ready for the General s coming. The rest of the forces " ferried over the water to Providence," and probably formed a junction with the main part of the Plymouth regiment at Providence, on Saturday, December llth. From Mr. Dudley s letter of the 15th, it will be seen that an account had been sent the Council of their movements to the time of arriving at Pau- tuxet. This letter is now lost from the files. In the evening of Sunday, December 12th, the whole body advanced " from Mr. Carpenter s," crossed the Pautuxet River and marched a long way into " Pomham s Country," now Warwick, R.I. ; but from the unskilfulness of their Warwick scouts (probably Eng lishmen, for if they had been Indians their failure would have been deemed treachery), their purpose of capturing Pomham and his people was defeated, and after a whole night spent in weary marching about, they arrived at Mr. Smith s garrison- house at Wickford on the 13th, and found their vessels from Seekonk already arrived. Capt. Mosely s company that day captured thirty-six Indians, including Indian Peter, who proved afterwards such an indispensable guide. There were many doubtless at Smith s garrison, employed by him and gathered thither for security. Church speaks of finding " the Eldridges and some other brisk hands," and going out and taking eighteen Indians, and finding the General arrived on his return to the garrison next morning before sunrise. This would seem from his story to have been on the morning of the 12th ; but the other accounts and his own reference to the General s arrival settle the day as the 13th and the time as before daybreak. This exploit of Mr. Church seems to have been unknown to Messrs. Dudley, Oliver and other contemporary writers. On Monday, 13th, no movement was made, but on the 14th the Gen eral moved his whole force, except Capt. Oliver s company, which kept garrison, out through the country to the westward, and burned the town of the Sachem " Ahmus," of whom I can find no mention except this of Mr. Dudley s, and the " Quarters " of Quaiapen, Magnus, or Matantuck, as her Indian name was under- THE ARMY AT NARKAGANSET. 181 stood by the English, " Old Queen " or " Sunke Squaw," as she was called by them. She was the widow of Mriksah, or Makanno, son of Canonicus. Her dominions were in the present towns of South and North Kingston and Exeter, and near the line between the latter, upon a high rocky hill, is still to be found the remains of an old Indian fort, known from earliest times as the " Queen s Fort," and probably near the place where her deserted " Quarters " were raided. The army that day destroyed one hundred and fifty wigwams, killed seven and captured nine Indians. In the mean time Capt. Oliver had sent out " five files," i.e. thirty of his men, under Sergeant (Peter) Bennet, who, scouting abroad, killed two Indians, a man and woman, and captured four more. Mr. Dudley, writing on the next day, Wednesday, December 15th, states that up to that time they had captured or killed, in all, fifty persons, and their prisoners in hand were forty. Capt. Oliver s account makes the number fifty-seven " young and old." Adding Mr. Church s eighteen, and we swell the number to seventy-five. From a careful survey of the matter in all its relations, I am inclined to think that Church was acting in conjunction with, and under the command of Capt. Mosely, to whom the official re turns accredit the capture of the whole body, eighteen of whom Church claims to have been his own captives. Wednesday, December 15th, the army seems to have been held in parley most of the day by the pretended negotiations of " Stone-wall," or " Stone-layer," John, an Indian who had lived much with the English, and had learned the trade of stone-mason, but was now hostile, and very serviceable to the Indians in many ways. Whether he was treacherous or not, the Indians were gathering and skulking about the English quarters while he was negotiating, and when he was safely away they began to pick off our men wherever they found opportunity, and later lay in ambush behind a stone wall and fired upon several companies of the English sent out to bring in Major Appleton s company, quartered some miles away. They were quickly repulsed with the loss of one of their leaders, and seem to have gone towards the general rendezvous at the great fort, and on the way they assaulted and burned the garrison of Jireh, or " Jerry " Bull at Pettisquamscot (Tower Hill, S. Kingston, R.IO, killing fifteen of those at the garrison, two only escaping. Thursday, December 16th, Capt. Prentice with his troop rode out, probably following the trail to Pettisquamscot, where he found the garrison-house in ruins. This is said to have been a very strong stone house, easily defended by a small number, and its destruction, of which there is no detailed account, must have been accomplished by either surprise or treachery. The news had a very depressing effect upon the army, who had hoped that the Connecticut forces had already arrived there. Friday, December 17th, came the news of the arrival of the 182 KING PHILIP S WAR. Connecticut regiment at Pettisquamscot. Our army seems to have been disposing of the captives and preparing for the march. Forty-seven of the captives were sold to Capt. Davenport on this day, Saturday, Dec. 18th. The General, leaving a small garrison at Wickford, pushed his army forward to Pettisquamscot, and about 5 P.M. joined the Connecticut troops consisting of about three hundred English and one hundred and fifty Mohegan Indians. In a severe snow-storm, the whole force, about one thousand men, encamped in the open field through that bitter cold night. Sunday, Dec. 19th, before daybreak (Capt. Oliver says, " at five o clock "), the whole force inarched away towards the enemy s great rendezvous. The following, gleaned from all available sources, may be of interest at this point : EOSTER OF THE OFFICERS OF THE ARMY OF THE UNITED COLONIES, AS ORGANIZED FOR THE NARRAGANSET CAMPAIGN, AND MUSTERED AT PETTISQUAMSCOT, DECEMBER 19, 1675. General Josiah "Winslow, Governor of Plymouth Colony, Commander-in-chief. General Staff. Daniel Weld, of Salem, Chief Surgeon. Joseph Dudley, of Boston, Chaplain. Benjamin Church, of Little Compton, R.I., Aid. MASSACHUSETTS REGIMENT. Samuel Appleton, of Ipswich, Major and Captain of First Company. Regimental Staff. Richard Knott, of Marblehead, Surgeon. Samuel Nowell, of Boston, Chaplain. John Morse, of Ipswich, Commissary. Officers of the Line. First Company : Jeremiah Swain, Lieutenant. Ezekiel "Woodward, Sergeant (Acting Ensign). Second Company : Samuel Mosely, Captain. Perez Savage, Lieutenant. Third Company : James Oliver, Captain. Ephraim Turner, Lieutenant. Peter Bennett, Sergeant (Acting Ensign) . KOSTER OF ARMY AT NARRAGANSET. 183 Fourth Company : Isaac Johnson, Captain. Phineas Upham, Lieutenant. Henry Bowen, Ensign. Fifth Company : Nathaniel Davenport, Captain. Edward Tyng, Lieutenant. John Drury, Ensign. Sixth Company : Joseph Gardiner, Captain. "William Hathorne, Lieutenant. Benjamin Sweet, Ensign (promoted Lieutenant). Jeremiah Neal, Sergeant (promoted Ensign) . Cavalry Company ( " Troop " ) : Thomas Prentice, Captain. John Wyman, Cornet (promoted Lieutenant). PLYMOUTH REGIMENT. William Bradford, of Marshfield, Major and Captain of First Company. Regimental Staff. Mathew Fuller, of Barnstable, Surgeon. Thomas Huckins, of Barnstable, Commissary. Officers of the Line. First Company : Robert Barker, of Duxbury, Lieutenant. Second Company : John Gorham, of Barnstable, Captain. Jonathan Sparrow, of Eastham, Lieutenant. William Wetherell, Sergeant. CONNECTICUT REGIMENT. Robert Treat, of Milford, Major. Regimental Staff. Gershom Bulkely, Surgeon. Rev. Nicholas Noyes, Chaplain. Stephen Barrett, Commissary. Officers of the Line. First Company : John Gallop, of Stonington, Captain. Second Company : Samuel Marshall, of Windsor, Captain. Third Company : Nathaniel Seely, of Stratford, Captain. Fourth Company : Thomas Watts, of Hartford, Captain. Fifth Company : John Mason, of Norwich, Captain. To the First and Fifth Connecticut Companies were attached Indian Scouting Companies, numbering seventy-five to each. AFTER THE BATTLE. The following officers were sent out from Massachusetts, with recruits, to reorganize their Regiment, and fill the vacancies caused by 184 KING PHILIP S WAR. the losses at the " Fort Fight." I do not attempt to assign the special commands. Surgeons : Dr. Jacob Willard, of Newton. Dr. John Cutler, of Hingham. Dr. John Clark, of Boston. Captains : Samuel Wadsworth. Joseph Sill. Samuel Brocklebank. Thomas Brattle. Jonathan Remington (promoted) . John Jacob. Nicholas Manning. Lieutenants : Stephen Greenleaf (promoted) . Daniel Ring (promoted) . Several of the above officers were in the "Fort Fight" as subor dinate officers, and afterwards promoted. FROM CONNECTICUT. There were several new companies and the following officers sent : Rev. James Fitch, of Say brook. Rev. John "Wise, of Branford. Capt. John Standley, ^i Lieut. Joseph Wadsworth, I Hartfofd CQ ^ Lieut. Samuel Martin, Senr., Zachary Sanford, Serg 1 ., Capt. John Beard, ) XT TT /-, , T ,, } New Haven Company. Lieut. Moses Mansfield, j J Capt. John Sillick, 1 -r, . ,, , -, /-, c,,,,, } Fan-field Company. Lieut. Stephen Barrett, j Of the forces of Massachusetts, the quota was 527 ; the number actually impressed was 540, including troopers, 75. The returns made at Dedham Plain give 465 foot, troopers, 73. The Connecti cut quota was 315, and there were also two companies of Indians, 150. Plymouth s quota was 158. The scene of the battle is well identified. It is situated in West Kingston, R.I., and belongs to the estate of the late Hon. J. G. Clark, whose residence was about one mile north-easterly from the old battlefield. Many relics of the battle are in posses sion of Mr. Clarke s family. Saving the changes incident upon the clearing and cultivation of contiguous land, the place could be easily identified as the battlefield, even if its location were not put beyond question by traditions and also by relics found from time to time upon the place. It is now, as then, an " island of four or five acres," surrounded by swampy land, overflowed except in the dryest part of the year. The island was cleared and plowed about 1775, and at that time many bullets were found deeply THE SWAMP FORT BATTLE. 185 bedded in the large trees ; quantities of charred corn were plowed up in different places, and it is said that Dutch spoons and Indian arrow-heads, etc., have been found here at different times. The accompanying map is a section slightly reduced of the large map of Rhode Island, made from surveys under the direction of H. F. Walling, Esq., and published by him in 1862. It takes in the line of march from Pettisquamscot (Tower-Hill) to the Fort. There is no " scale of miles " upon the large map, but by a careful comparison of known distances it appears that it is about seven miles in a bee line, nearly west, from Tower-Hill to the battlefield ; by way of McSparran Hill in direct courses, about ten miles. The army, following the higher land, with frequent halts and probably much uncertain wandering and careful scout ing, consumed the time from five o clock in the morning to about one o clock P.M. ; and it is likely that in this roundabout march they made about fifteen or sixteen miles, the distance reported. In the retreat, the army probably followed back upon their morning track as far as McSparran Hill, and thence to Wickford to their quarters at Mr. Richard Smith s garrison-house, arriving there about two o clock in the morning, after a march of about eighteen miles, as was reported at the time. Mr. Smith, called Captain and Major by contemporary writers, was a person of wide influence in this part of the country, and held in high esteem in all the colonies. He was the son of Richard Smith, Senior, who came from " Gloster Shire," in England, and in 1641 bought a large tract of [land, including the present town of Wickford, and there built the first English house in Narraganset, and set up a trading station and offered free entertainment to all travellers. THE BATTLE AT THE GREAT SWAMP FORT. About one o clock, P.M., the army came upon the enemy at the edge of the swamp, in the midst of which the Indian fortress was built, the Massachusetts regiment leading in the march, Plymouth next, and Connecticut bringing up the rear. Of the Massachusetts troops Capts. Mosely and Davenport led the van and came first upon the Indians, and immediately opened fire upon them, thus at the beginning gaining the important advantage of the first fire, which the Indians had almost always gained and made so deadly by deliberate volleys from ambush, as they doubtless purposed now. The Indians returned the fire with an ineffectual volley, and then fled into the swamp closely pursued by the foremost companies, who did not wait for the word of command, or stand much upon the " order of their going," until they reached the fortifications within which the Indians hastily betook themselves. This fort was situated upon an island of some five or six acres in the midst of a cedar swamp, which was impassable except to the Indians by their accustomed paths, and now made passable only by the severe cold of the previous day and night. It is probable that the Indians 186 KING PHILIP S WAR. depended chiefly upon the swamp to protect them, though their defences are described as having been of considerable strength. A portion of the high ground had been enclosed, and from a careful comparison of the most reliable accounts, it seems that the forti fications were well planned, probably by the Englishman Joshua Teffe, or lift, as Mr. Dudley calls him. Mr. Hubbard says : " The Fort was raised upon a Kind of Island of five or six acres of rising Land in the midst of a swamp ; the sides of it were made of Palisadoes set upright, the which was compassed about with a Hedg of almost a rod Thickness." A contemporary writer (whose account was published at the time in London, and is reprinted in Mr. Drake s publication called the " Old Indian Chronicle " ) says : " In the midst of the Swamp was a Piece of firm Land, of about three or four Acres, whereon the Indians had built a kind of Fort, being palisadoed round, and within that a clay Wall, as also felled down abundance of Trees to lay quite round the said Fort, but they had not quite finished the said Work." It is evident from these, the only detailed accounts, and from some casual references, that the works were rude and incomplete, but would have been almost impregnable to our troops had not the swamp been frozen. At the corners and exposed portions, rude block-houses and flankers had been built, from which a raking fire could be poured upon any attacking force. Either by chance, or the skill of Peter, their Indian guide, the English seem to have come upon a point of the fort where the Indians did not expect them. Mr. Church, in relating the circumstances of Capt. Gardiner s death, says that he was shot from that side " next the upland where the English entered the swamp." The place where he fell was at the "east end of the fort." The tradition that the English approached the swamp by the rising land in front of the " Judge Marchant " house, thus seems confirmed. This " upland " lies about north of the battlefield. Our van pursued those of the enemy who first met them so closely that they were led straight to the entrance used by the Indians themselves, perhaps by their design then to attract atten tion from an exposed part of their works a short distance away. The passage left by the Indians for their own use, as before men tioned, was by a long tree over a " place of water," across which but one might pass at a time, " and which was so waylaid that they would have been cut off that had ventured." Mr. Hubbard counts among the fortunate circumstances of that day that the troops did not attempt to carry this point, and that they discovered the only assailable point a little farther on. This was at a corner of the fort where was a large unfinished gap, where neither palisades nor the abattis, or " hedge," had been placed, but only a long tree had been laid across about five feet from the ground, to fill the gap, and might be easily passed ; only that the block-house right opposite this gap and the flankers at the sides were finished, FORT TAKEN AND BURNED. 187 from which a galling fire might sweep and enfilade the passage. Mr. Hubbard s account is very clear about this, yet several writers have sadly confused matters and described the first as the point of assault. The companies of Capts. Davenport and Johnson came first 1 to this place, and those officers at once charged through the gap and over the log at the head of their companies, but Johnson fell dead at the log, and Davenport a little within the fort, and their men were met with so fierce a fire that they were forced to retire again and fall upon their faces to avoid the fury of the musketry till it should somewhat abate. Mosely and Gardiner, pressing to their assistance, met a similar reception, losing heavily, till they too fell back with the others, until Major Appleton coming up with his own and Capt. Oliver s men, massed his entire force as a storming column, and it is said that the shout of one of the com manders that the Indians were running, so inspired the soldiers that they made an impetuous assault, carried the entrance amain, beat the enemy from one of his flankers at the left, which afforded them a temporary shelter from the Indians still holding the block house opposite the entrance. In the mean time, the General, holding the Plymouth forces in reserve, pushed forward the Con necticut troops, who not being aware of the extent of the danger from the block-house, suffered fearfully at their first entrance, but charged forward gallantly, though some of their brave officers and many of their comrades lay dead behind them, and unknown numbers and dangers before. The forces now joining, beat the enemy step by step, and with the fierce fighting, out of their block-houses and various fortifications. Many of the Indians, driven from their works, fled outside, some doubtless to the wig wams inside, of which there were said to be upward of five hun dred, many of them large and rendered bullet-proof by large quantities of grain in tubs and bags, placed along the sides. In these many of their old people and their women and children had gathered for safety, and behind and within these as defences the Indians still kept up a skulking fight, picking off our men. After three hours hard fighting, with many of the officers and men wounded or dead, a treacherous enemy of unknown numbers and resources lurking in the surrounding forests, and the night coming on, word comes to fire the wigwams, and the battle be comes a fearful holocaust, great numbers of those who had taken refuge therein being burned. The fight had now raged for nearly three hours, with dreadful carnage in proportion to the numbers engaged. It is not certain at just what point the Plymouth forces were pushed forward, but most likely after the works were carried, and the foremost, ex hausted, retired for a time, bearing their dead and wounded to the rear ; but we are assured that all took part in the engagement, 1 John Raymond (Rayment) claimed to have been the first soldier to enter the fort. 188 KING PHILIP S WAR. coming on in turn as needed. It is doubtful if the cavalry crossed the swamp, but were rather held in reserve and as scouts to cover the rear and prevent surprises from any outside parties. When now the fortress and all its contents were burning, and destruction assured, our soldiers hastily gathered their wounded and as many as possible of their dead, and formed their shattered column for the long and weary march back to Wickford. Reliable details of this battle are few, and only gleaned from casual references here and there, and thus many, who have sought to write upon the matter, have quoted in full the story of Ben jamin Church, who relates his own experience, and draws out his personal reminiscences with all an old man s fondness for his deeds of " long ago." The very small part he took in this battle is evident even from his own story, and from the utter silence of other writers, especially Mr. Hubbard, who knew Church and commends him highly for his exploits in the Mount Hope cam paign. No one can doubt the ability or courage of Mr. Church, but his part in this battle was simply that when the fort was carried and the fighting nearly over, he went, with some thirty others, into and through the fort and out into the swamp upon the trail of the retreating foe, discovered, ambushed and scattered a skulking party of them returning to the attack, chased a few of them into the fort amongst the huts, and was himself severely wounded by them thus brought to bay. I wish here to record my protest against the unjust, often weak, and always inconsiderate, criticism bestowed upon our leaders in this campaign, and especially in this battle, for their lack of foresight in abandoning the shelter and provisions of the fort, their sacrifice of the lives of our wounded men through their removal and the dangers and fatigues of the long march, and their inhumanity in burning the helpless and innocent in their huts and wigwams. It is well to remember at the start that many of the wisest, ablest and bravest men of the three colonies were the leaders in this affair. A noble commander, wise and brave ; reverend ministers, by no means backward with their opinions ; the most prominent and skilful surgeons the country afforded; veteran majors and captains of Massachusetts and Connecticut, with their veteran soldiers fresh from the severe experiences in the western campaign, inured to danger and experienced in Indian wiles and deceits : against all these we have recorded only the remonstrance of Mr. Church, who up to that time, at least, had experience in Indian warfare only as a scout, and the only record we have of any protest by him was made many years after the affair. And again, from the standpoint of their conditions as nearly as we can now judge, it seems that their hasty retreat was wise. They were some sixteen miles from their base of supplies (it is doubtful if they had noted the Indian supplies until the burning began). There was no way of reaching their MARCH BACK TO WICKFORD. 189 provisions and ammunition at Wickford except by detaching a portion of their force now reduced greatly by death, wounds and exposure. The numbers of Indians that had escaped, and were still in the woods close at hand, were unknown, but supposed to be several thousand, with report of a thousand in reserve about a mile distant. These were now scattered and demoralized, but in a few hours might rally and fall upon the fort, put our troops, in their weakened condition, upon the defensive, and make their retreat from the swamp extremely difficult if not utterly impos sible, encumbered as they would be by the wounded, whose swollen and stiffened wounds in a few hours would render removal doubly painful and dangerous. Added to this was the chance of an attack upon the garrison at Wickford, and the dread of the midnight ambuscade, which every hour s delay made more likely and would render more dangerous. Thus it seems to me that from the standpoint of military strategy, the immediate retreat to Wickford was best. As to humanity, we must remem ber the harsh times in which they were living, the contempt in which the Indians were held first, as heathen, against whom war was righteous ; second, as idle and treacherous vagabonds, with no rights which honest industry was bound to respect; third, as deadly enemies lying in wait to plunder, burn and destroy. Moreover, the very life of the colonies was threatened by this war ; many thriving hamlets were already in ashes ; hundreds of families were broken up and scattered up and down, with loss of all ; fathers, husbands and brothers slain or in cap tivity, farms and homes laid waste, whole communities huddled in wretched block-houses, while the "reign of terror" swept about them. Brookfield, "Beers s Plain," and "Bloody-Brook," with their outrage and carnage, were fresh in mind, and, a few days before, the destruction and massacre at Pettisquamscot ; while even here at their feet were their dead and dying comrades and beloved officers. Is it strange that they were cruel, when now for the first time they came face to face with the authors of all their troubles in a fair fight? By any candid student of history I believe this must be classed as one of the most glorious victories ever achieved in our history, and considering conditions, as displaying heroism, both in stubborn patience and dashing intrepidity, never excelled in American warfare. Of the details of the march to Wickford very little is known ; through a bitter cold winter s night, in a blinding snow-storm, carrying two hundred and ten of their wounded and dead, these soldiers, who had marched from dawn till high noon, had engaged in a desperate life-and-death struggle from noon till sunset, now plodded sturdily back to their quarters of the day before, through deepening snows and over unbroken roads. 1 By the letters below, it will be seen that the General and staff, with their escort, got 1 There is a tradition (mentioned in a note in Hon. Elisha R. Potter, Jr. a " Early History of Narragansett ") that the English feared an ambuscade in force on the line of march by which they had come, and so marched by way of SIcSparran Hill on their return. 190 KING PHILIP S WAR. separated from the main column, lost their way and wandered about till 7 o clock next morning, while the main body reached their quarters at 2 o clock. DEAD AND WOUNDED. The names of those officers and soldiers of Massachusetts killed and wounded in this battle have been given heretofore in the sketches of the companies to which they belonged. By Capt. Oliver s letter, written a little more than a month afterwards from the seat of war, and considered official, we learn that up to that time the dead numbered about sixty-eight, and the wounded one hundred and fifty, in the whole army. Eight of the dead were left in the fort, and twelve more were dead when they started back to Wickford. Twenty-two died on the march, and before the next day, Monday, Dec. 20th, when they buried thirty-four in one grave, and six more within two days, eight died at Rhode Island, and three others, making in all but fifty- nine, if we reckon the twelve carried from the fort as a part of the thirty-four buried Dec. 20th; otherwise, seventy-one. But the first estimate of sixty-eight is satisfied if we add the twenty killed at the fort to those buried at Wickford and Rhode Island, and conclude that the twelve taken from the fort were buried somewhere on the march. Niriigret, sachem of the Nianticks, sent to General Winslow word that his people had buried the dead of the English left at the Fort, and that the number was twenty-four, and he asked for a charge of powder for each. This information was given in a letter from Major Bradford to Rev. Mr. Cotton of Plymouth. Of the losses of Massachusetts we are not left in doubt, since there is still preserved in our archives a full and official return, which Mr. Hubbard gives substantially, adding to the wounded probably those whose wounds were slight and not reported at the time, and with some modifications of the list of dead, though with the same total. The official list of those killed and wounded in the battle, including three of Capt. Gardiner s men killed previous to the battle, is dated January 6, 1675, and entitled, A list of Major Sam 1 Apleton souldjers y were slayne & wounded the 19 th Decemb. 75, at the Indians fort at Narraganset. Killed. Wounded. Major Appleton, 4 18 Capt, Mosely, 6 9 Capt. Oliver, 5 8 In the Company of Capt. Davenport, 4 11 Capt. Johnson, 4 8 Capt. Gardiner, 7 10 Capt. Prentice, 1 3 [Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 104.] 31 67 LOSSES IN THE BATTLE. 191 Of the officers, Capts. Davenport, Johnson and Gardiner were killed, and Lieutenants Upham, Savage, Swain, and Ting were wounded. Of the Connecticut troops, seventy-one were killed and wounded according to Hubbard ; and according to the eminent historian of Connecticut, Dr. Benjamin Trumbull, seventy. Capt. Gallop, 10 Mr. Hubbard s Account. Capt. Marshall, 14 Of New Haven Company, 20 Capt. Seely, 20 Of Capt. Siely his Company, 20 Capt. Mason, 9 Of Capt. Watt his Company, 17 Capt. Watts, 17 70 Of Capt. Marshall his Company, 1471 Major Treat, by tradition, is said to have been the last man to have left the fort, commanding the rear guard of the army ; and of his captains, Gallop, Marshall and Seely were killed, and Capt. Mason mortally wounded. Of the Plymouth forces, Major Bradford, commander, and Benjamin Church of the General s staff were severely wounded, and of the soldiers the killed and wounded in both companies were twenty, by best accounts. The grave of the forty buried at Wickford was marked by a tree called the " grave appletree," which was blown down in the gale of September, 1815. The wounded were sent in vessels to Rhode Island, and well cared for. Of the losses of the enemy there can be no reliable account. Capt. Oliver says, " By the best intelligence we killed 300 fight ing men, and took say 350 and above 300 women and children." Mr. Dudley, two days after the fight, reckons about two hundred ; Capt. Mosely counted sixty-four in one corner of the fort ; and Capt. Gorham made an estimate of at least one hundred and fifty. The desperate strait of the Indians is shown by their leaving the dead in their flight. Indian prisoners afterward reported seven hundred killed. The conduct of the Mohegan and Pequod allies is represented by Capt. Oliver as false, they firing in the air, but securing much plunder. I have found no other notice of their part in the battle. CORRESPONDENCE. The following letters, written by Joseph Dudley, who was with Gen. Winslow as one of his staff or " Guard," and also served as chaplain to the army, are perhaps the most reliable official reports of the campaign that remain. The letter of the fifteenth is still preserved, as noted below. That of the twenty-first was pub lished by Governor Hutchinson in his " History of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay," London edition (1765), page 302. I have not been able to find the original of this last. The letter of the Council to Gen. Winslow, in answer to Dudley s first, is pre- 192 KING PHILIP S WAR. served, as below noted, and in two copies the first a rough draft, the second a carefully written copy in Secretary Rawson s own hand. Letter of Joseph Dudley. May it please your Honn r Mr Smiths 15, 10, 75 I am commanded by the Generall to give your Honn r account of our proceeding since our last fr m Pautuxet in the Sabath evening we advanced the whole body from Mr Carpenters with Intent to surprise Pomham & his Party at about 10 or 12 Miles Distance having infor mation by our Warwick Scouts of his seat but the darkness of y e Night Difficulty of our passage & unskilf ulness of Pilots we passed the whole Night & found ourselves at such Distance yet from y m y we Diverted & Marched to Mr. Smiths, found our Sloops from Seaconk arrived since which by y e help of Indian Peter by whom your Honnor had the Information formerly of v 6 Number & resolution of y e Naragansets, we have burned two of their Towns viz : Ahmus who is this summer come down amongst them & y 6 old Queens quarters consisting of about 150 Many of them large wigwams & seized & slayn 50 Persons in all our prisoners being about 40 Concerning whom the generall prayes your advice concerning their transportation or Disposall all which was per formed without any loss save a slight wound by an Arrow in Lieut. Wayman s face, the whole body of them we find removed into then- great swamp at Canonicus his quarters where we hope with the addition of Connecticut, when arrived we hope to Coop them up, this day we Intend the removall or spoyle of y r Corn & hope to Morrow a March toward them, our soldiers being very chearful are forward notwithstand ing great Difficulty by weather & otherwise, abovs d Peter whom we have found very faithfull will Make us believe y y r are 3000 fighting Men though Many unarmed Many well fitted with lances we hope by cutting off their forage to force them to a fayr battle In y e Mean time I have only to present the Generalls humble service to your [sic] & to beg your Intense prayers for this so great Concern and remayn your Honnors Humble Servant Jos: DUDLEY. Goodale nor Moor arrived we fear want of shot. My humble service to Madam Leveret Brother and Sister Hubbard & Dudley. Amongst our Prison" & Slayn we find 10 or 12 Wampanoags. [Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 101.] Answer of the Council to Gen. Winslow. S r y r Intelligences and Advices subjected by Mr. Dudley the 15 & 16 Ins wee received this Morning being the 18 th at eight of the clock. Wee desire to blesse God y hee hath smiled upon you in y r first Attempts & hath delivered some of o r enemys into yo r hands & also to Acknowledge Gods favou r in the supporting y e hearts of yo r souldiers in such a severe season & keeping up their spirits w th courage and that you have received no more losse of men : But yet also according to God s wonted manner CORRESPONDENCE AFTER THE BATTLE. 193 of dealing hee hath mixed the Cup w th some bitternes ; in the losse susteyned in yo r soldiers especially Mr Bulls, house & y e people y re also y the forces of Conecticut are not joyiied w th you nor the vessell w th supplys of Ammunition & provision then arrived ; Wee hope by this time both the vessell may be arrived & the Conecticut men conjoined w th you but least that should faile wee have sent a cart w tli Ammunition ; and an order from Gou nr Winthrop for their forces to March speedily ; Concerning the disposall of y e Indian prisoners ; Our Advice is if any present to buy them, they may be sould there & delivered by your Orders or if that cannot bee then to secure them at the Island or els-where at yo r best discretion ; Wee have no more to add at present but our hearty prayers unto the Lord of Hoasts to appear w th & for you & all w th you, in all yo r enterprises, for the Lord & his people and cover all yo r heads in the day of Battle, So w th our particular respects & love to y r self & all y e Command" & Ministers ; wee remajne Yo r respective friends & servants Boston 18: December 1675 EDWARD RAWSON Secret 7 in the name at one of the clock. & by y e order of the Council. [Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 102.] Second Letter of Joseph Dudley. 1 Mr Smith s, 21, 10, 1675 (Dec. 21, 1675). May it please your honour, The coming in of Connecticut force to Petaquamscot, and surprisal of six and slaughter of 5 on Friday night, Saturday we marched towards Petaquamscot, though in the snow, and in conjunction about midnight or later, we advanced ; Capt. Mosely led the van, after him Massachu- sets, and Plimouth and Connecticut in the rear; a tedious march in the snow, without intermission, brought us about two of the clock after noon, to the entrance of the swamp, by the help of Indian Peter, who dealt faithfully with us ; our men, with great courage, entered the swamp about twenty rods ; within the cedar swamp we found some hundreds of wigwams, forted in with a breastwork and flankered, and many small blockhouses up and down, round about; they entertained us with a fierce fight, and many thousand shot, for about an hour, when our men valiantly scaled the fort, beat them thence, and from the blockhouses. In which action we lost Capt. Johnson, Capt Danforth, and Capt Gar diner, and their lieutenants disabled, Capt. Marshall also slain ; Capt. Seely, Capt. Mason, disabled, and many other of our officers, insomuch that, by a fresh assault and recruit of powder from their store, the Indians fell on again, recarried and beat us out of, the fort, but by the great resolution and courage of the General and Major, we reinforced, and very hardly entered the fort again, and fired the wigwams, with many living and dead persons in them, great piles of meat and heaps of corn, the ground not admitting burial of their store, were consumed ; the number of their dead, we generally suppose the enemy lost at least two hundred men ; Capt. Mosely counted in one corner of the fort sixty four men ; Capt. Goram reckoned 150 at least ; But, O ! Sir, mine heart bleeds to give your honor an account of our lost men, but especially our resolute Captains, as by account inclosed, and yet not so many, 1 This letter is copied from the note in Ilutchiuson n History of Massachusetts, vol. i. page 273. 194 KING PHILIP S WAR. but we admire there remained any to return, a captive woman, well known to Mr Smith, informing that there were three thousand five hun dred men engaging us and about a mile distant a thousand in reserve, to whom if God had so pleased, we had been but a morsel, after so much disablement : she informeth, that one of their sagamores was slain and their powder spent, causing their retreat, and that they are in a distressed condition for food and houses, that one Joshua Tift, an Englishman, is their encourager and conductor. Philip was seen by one, credibly informing us, under a strong guard. After our wounds were dressed, we drew up for a march, not able to abide the field in the storm, and weary, about two of the clock, obtained our quarters, with our dead and wounded, only the General, Ministers, and some other persons of the guard, going to head a small swamp, lost our way, and returned again to the evening s quarters, a wonder we were not a prey to them, and, after at least thirty miles marching up and down, in the morning recovered our quarters, and had it not been for the arrival of Goodale next morning, the whole camp had perished ; The whole army, especially Connecticut, is much disabled and unwilling to march, with tedious storms, and no lodgings, and frozen and swollen limbs, Major Treat importunate to return at least to Stonington ; Our dead and wounded are about two hundred, disabled as many ; the want of officers, the consideration whereof the General commends to your honor, forbids any action at present, and we fear whether Connecticut will comply, at last, to any action. We are en deavoring, by good keeping and billetting our men at several quarters, and, if possible removal of our wounded to Rhode-Island, to recover the spirit of our soldiers, and shall be diligent to find and understand the removals on other action of the enemy, if God please to give us advantage against them. As we compleat the account of our dead, now in doing, the Council is of the mind, without recruit of men we shall not be able to engage the main body. I give your honour hearty thanks I am Sir, your honor s for your kind lines, of which humble servant, I am not worthy JOSEPH DUDLEY. Since the writing of these lines, the General and Council have jointly concluded to abide on the place, notwithstanding the desire of Con necticut, only entreat that a supply of 200 may be sent us, with supply of commanders ; and, whereas we are forced to garrison our quarters with at least one hundred, three hundred men, upon joint account of the colonies, will serve, and no less, to effect the design. This is by order of the council. Blunderbusses, and hand grenadoes, and armour, if it may, and at least two armourers to mend arms. COMMISSARY DEPARTMENT. The following accounts are inserted in this place as showing somewhat the method and material of the commissary de partment at that time. The accounts, as will be noticed, relate largely to the early part of the war, and the Mount Hope campaign under General Cudworth. The preliminary accounts SUPPLIES TO PLYMOUTH. 195 having been squared by Mr. Southward (Southworth), all the rest were gathered in the general settlement in January, 1675-6. In Hull s Journal. 27 August 1675 Plymouth Colony Dr. to Cash for severalls as followeth. To Phillip Curtis for five men to guard powder and shott 00, 17, 00 To the Guard for expence at Roxbury 00, 08, 06 } 02, 05, 09 for i bb 1 of biskett 00, 05, 09 for l lb of powder besides what they brought 00, 01, 90 Expense of s d Guard at Dedham 00, 13, 00 September 14 th 1675 Richard Smith for guarding Ammunition 00, 03, 00 John Lawrence ditto. 00, 03, 00 James Hosly ditto. 00, 03, 00 James Montt ditto. 00, 03, 00 Ebenezer Hill ditto. 00, 03, 00 00, 15, 00 November 23 d . Cr. By Received of Mr. Southward for disbursements ....... 03, 00, 09 January 25 th 1675 Plimouth Colony Dr. to Sundry acc ts as hear stated in p per p cells, for severlls dd . by sundry persons for the use of s Colony at divers times from the 29 th June last to this inoneth inclusive as per the acc ts , receipts, & orders relating thereunto filed as p No. 1269 & 1270 285, 14, 10 2, 3, 0, Armes for a muskett to Gen 1 Cudworth , Liqors for Rum to viz. Mr. James Brown 9 Gall Their forces at Naragansett 12 gall Apparel for severalls viz. .... To Nathaniel Gunny 1 pr shoes . . 0, Ditto Benjamin Peirce . . . 0, _, To CaptCornelius,Wastcoat, Shoes & Stokins 0, 14, To Josiah Joslin, shoes and stockins . 0, 7, To Gen 1 Cudworth 6 pr.shoes and 13 p.stockinsS, Delivered by the Commissioners to their forces at Narragansett viz. 26 shirts at 6 Wastcoats 9 pr drawers 1 pr breeches 2 lined coats 10 pr shoes ) 5 pr stockins ) 6 y ds of canvas for neckcloaths shott pouch and calicoe 180 y ds sale cloth at y e . 00, 18, 00 fj J 05, 05, 00 32, 11, 00 7, 16, 2, 14, 1, 4,0 0, 18, 3, 0, 4, 15, 1, 0,0 6, 15, 28, 2, (32, 11, 0) 196 KING PHILIP S WAR. Ammunition Id viz 103, 08, 10 To the officers a bagg with 35 lb9 powder 2, 14, Ditto to Benjamin Church with 18 lbs and 50 bullets 2, 13, 6 To the Gen 11 1 cask bullets qr l lb or better 2, 16, To Mr. James Brown 5 bbl powder at 7 lb pr bbl. 38, 10, Ditto 9 cask & 1 chest bullets qr. ll lb 25, 13, 4 More dd . by the Commissaries 480 flints 0, 10, 124 bullets 2, 12, 8 half barren s of powder of the Mattachusetts ~) detained by the Governor of Rhoad Island > 28, 0, for 4 barrells lent to Plimouth _) (103,08,10) Tobacco, for 15 lb to Nathaniel Gunny . . . . 0, 07, 06 Tooles, dd to the officers viz 3 spades 0, 10, 2 Mattucks 1, 14, }- 02, 08, 00 4 Axes 1, 04, Biskett dd viz. To the Officers 150 cakes 0, 14, To Mr. James Brown 9 hhds. 31, 10, [> 44, 04, 00 To Gen a11 Cudworth 3 hhds. 12, 00, ) Grocery for 26 lb Raisons solis to ditto Brown . . .01, 06, 00 Fish for 1 hhd. ditto 04, 00, 00 Porke ditto for 5 bb 1 at 4 Ib pr bb 1 . . 20, 00, 00 ) q 2 bb 1 ditt ... 8, 00, 00 j 2y UU Miscellanies, for severalls viz ..... 24, 19, 06 To Beniamin Church 1 hh d biscake ) , <n i VU l f Hi I", 00 2 bb 1 porke j 2 bsh. pease & 1 sack } A1 no An ^/\lh A 1 I U 1- S UZ \)\) 20 lb tobacoe } To Capt. Goram l hhd biskett & pease ^ wanting 200 cakes nQ 1 n A /. -, ] h fOo, 17, 06 lb raisons sons 4 large peeces of porke To Gen a11 Cudworth 1 kittle . .01, 10, 00 To ditto Church 1 jarr oyle ~) 2 galls wine [-01, 03, 00 10 lb raisons solis ) To L Tanner l bbl pease 1 (4 ?) bbl biscake [-04,00,00 | bbl porke ) To John Cobleigh for ditt. Ch(urch) ? I 1 ic nn l bbl salt } lj ib U< At Narragansett 2 qire p(aper) 0, 01, 00 (24, 19, 06) Billetings, for quartering 12 souldiers at M r Miles hous ") Alsoe Gen a11 Cudworth s and Capt Bradfords Companies i i n 00 00 the 17 th 18 th & 19 th dayes of July with bread, pease, | pork tobaco and liq" Pease viz To dit. Browne 3 hhd with Cask 9,00,00) 1ft , r nn To dit. Cudworth hhd 1, 15, 00 j Cask for 9 hhd to ditto Browne . . . . . 2,01,00 " DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY." 197 Maritim disbursements viz . . . . for the f rait of 4 hhd bisket and 2 bbl of tobaco 1 j 00 at guess j Ditto to p l of the hire of Vessells 10, 00, 00 Salt dd . viz To Ditto Browne I"" 1 qr. 12 bsh & Cash 2, 00, 00 ) By Ditto Commissaries l bsh 0, 06, 00 ) Thomas Terry for l firkins of sope l bsh meale, 10 wooden boules and 1 cann (285, 14, 10) 11, 00, 00 02, 06, 00 02, 05, 00 June 24 th 1676. Plymouth Colony Cr By Viz . Ammunission for powder & ball returned as p No 3185 Biskett dit. **, ww, w j Graine for pease dit. 03, 00, 00 J By Disbursements for Ballance as p bond 11535 fo 544 215, 16, 06 [44, 18, 00 1 22, 00, 00 f 69, 18, 04 The account is thus carried to a later Ledger, which is lost. MARITIME DEPARTMENT. The following may show somewhat of the " naval " power of that day, and the methods and means of transporting supplies. 1675 Maritime Disbursements Dr. Nov 20 To Peter Treby for frait of the Sloope Primrose 09, 06, 00 Dec 10 To Israel Nichols for wood for Goodall s Vessel 00, 05, 00 " " To Stephen Hascott for damrnage of the Sloope Swan 03, 10, 00 Feby 29 To Anthony Low for frait . . . .05, 00, 00 1676 June 24 " Richard Goodall for frait . . . .22, 00 ? 00 Nehemiah Goodall for Sen ice . . . 05, 10 00 Pilgrim Simpkin " ... 02, 08 00 James Twisdell . . . 02, 08? 00 Richard Earle . . . 02, 08, 00 Ezekiel Gardner . . .02, 02, 00 William Woodbery . . . 05, 10, 00 Anthony Haywood . . .04, 00, 00 Thomas Moore . . . 10, 00, 00 " John Baker ... 02, 08, 00 Andrew Belcher, of Cambridge, a prominent merchant, with vessels operating between Boston and Connecticut ports, was active in these affairs, but his accounts doubtless fall into a later Ledger. In the State Archives, in some Bills of Benjamin Gillam against the colony, I find the item, Jan y 10, 1675 : To charges on men to cut out Andrew Belcher s Sloop to go to Nar- ragansett, 14s. 198 KING PHILIP S WAR. Mr. Church speaks of the arrival of Andrew Belcher as oppor tune in saving the army ; Mr. Dudley says Goodale. Mr. Hub- bard s reference to the vessels "frozen in at Cape Cod," causing distress, was, I think, to a later time. After the return of the army to Mr. Smith s Garrison, the burial of the dead and removal of their wounded to Rhode Island, they spent several weeks parleying with the enemy, watch ing and recruiting. Major Treat withdrew with his Connecticut forces, against the wishes, it appears, of the General and the other officers, and was later called to account for insubordination. Additional troops were sent down from Boston, and Massachu setts and Plymouth held the field for a month longer ; but their operations and the closing part of this winter campaign, and the new forces engaged, must fall into the next chapter. Massachusetts afterwards redeemed the promise made to the soldiers at Dedham Plain, and granted to eight hundred and forty claimants, including those of Plymouth, the seven Nar- raganset townships. Connecticut to her volunteers in the Narra- ganset wars granted the township of Voluntown. XIV. CLOSE OF THE NARRAGANSET CAMPAIGN; THE " HUNGRY MARCH." AFTER the battle at the Narraganset Fort, several weeks of partial inactivity ensued, while both the English and the Indians were seeking to recover somewhat from the severe blow each had received. The forces of Massachusetts and Ply mouth remained at Smith s garrison at Narraganset, while Major Treat with the Connecticut regiment returned to Stonington about December 28th. In the treasurer s account with Connecticut colony there is a charge " For billiting 40 wounded men 7 days," and as there is no other occasion on which so many were wounded, it is fair to assume that the Connecticut forces did not retire before the 28th. On January 14 th the Council of Connecticut issued orders to Mr. John Brackett of Wallingford, and Serg*. William Ward, "to go to New London, to care for the wounded there, while Mr. Buckley goeth forth with the army." So it would seem that many of their wounded had been carried as far as New London. From various sources, the accounts of the most reliable histo rians of the time, from contemporary letters and notices, we are able to glean some few items indicating the situation of affairs at the seat of war. The Indians were greatly demoralized and evidently very solic itous as to the immediate future action of our army, as they sent in a delegation to the General on Thursday, December 23d, four days after the fight, ostensibly to negotiate in regard to peace, but in reality, doubtless, to ascertain the strength and intentions of the English. Some of the Indians had returned to their fort upon the retreat of the troops, and it is likely were able to rescue a part of their provisions from the flames, but the main body was gathered into a swamp some three miles distant, while those who had joined the Narragansets from neighboring tribes returned home. Mr. Dudley wrote that Philip was seen by one of ours with a strong body guard during or after the battle. If so he must have made a rapid march between that and January 6th, 200 KING PHILIP S WAR. upon which date Governor Andros, of the New York Colony, writes to the Connecticut Governor : This is to acquaint you that late last night I had intelligence that Philip & 4 oroOO North Indians fighting men, were come within 40 or 50 miles of Albany northerly, where they talk of continuing this winter ; that Phi: is sick, and one Sahamoshuha the Comander in chief. Where upon I have despatched orders theither. I have found no reliable proof that Philip or his Wampanoag warriors, as a body, had any part in the Narraganset fight, while there is some direct testimony that they did not. Indian captives refer the command of the Indians to other chiefs, and a contem porary writer in the series of letters published in London under the title, " Present State of New England, with respect to the Indian War," says positively, " King Philip hath not yet been at Narraganset, as we feared, but is retired with his Men near Albany where he hath kept his Winter Quarters." This place is since known as Scattacook, and is situated in Rensselaer County, about twenty miles north of Albany. The great snow-storm that began at the time of the battle and lasted for several days rendered any movement of the infantry impossible, even if they had been in condition ; and then suddenly there came a great mid-winter thaw, which further prevented their motion. Capt. Prentice s troop kept scouting and watching to guard against surprise, and to gather in whatever was possible of their enemy s supplies of corn, of which they obtained quantities, but the provisioning of this large body of men had to be done chiefly by vessels sent from Boston, and by some, at this time, gathering corn along the port towns of Connecticut, as we learn from their archives and from other sources. On the 27th of December Capt. Prentice with his troop made a march into Pomham s country (now Warwick) and destroyed near a hundred wigwams. December 28th, a squaw captured at the fort was sent to the Indians with an offer of peace, if they would agree to the terms of the former treaty, and such other conditions as the English might impose, and give up all " Philip s Indians." The squaw did not return, but on December 30th a message came from the sachems proffering their thanks for the offer, but com plained that the English made war upon them without notice. This Indian owned, as did the squaw, that the Indians lost three hundred of their best fighting men. January 4th, two prisoners were taken, of whom one, being a Wampanoag, was put to death. January 5th, the Indians sent in a captive child, three or four years of age, belonging at Warwick. On the 7th, messengers came from them laying the blame upon Canonchet, who when he had visited Boston and made his treaty with the English, had returned and deceived his people as to the terms ; but all these overtures RECRUITING AFTER THE BATTLE. 201 were evidently practised to gain time and take the attention of the English from the real movements of the Indians while they were making ready for their flight to the north-west. On the 8th these were sent back with positive instructions as to terms of peace. On the same day Ninigret, sachem of the Niantics, sent in decla ration and evidence of the reality of his friendship and of the dire straits to which the hostile Indians were reduced. In the meantime the Commissioners of the United Colonies were making every exertion to put a fresh army into the field. As early as December 25th it had been voted to raise one thousand men to recruit the army in the field, and the first of these were sent out about Jan. 6th 1 under Capt. Samuel Brocklebank of Rowley (I think). The weather was extremely cold, and they suffered severely on the march, part of the way through a fierce snow storm " that bit some of them by the heels with the frost," accord ing to Mr. Hubbard. The writer of " The Present State of New England," the letters above mentioned, says that eleven of the men were " frozen to death, and many others were sick and dis heartened." January 10th, these recruits arrived at headquarters and were joyfully received. An order of the Council of Massachusetts, given January 14th, directs Major Gookin " to order the Eastern Souldiers with Horse and Foot, as soon as they come to Cambridge, to march to the army and to put them under such conduct as he sees right, until they get to Narraganset to Major Appleton, sending away with them the Armorer that is there already." On Jan. 17th the Council ordered the Committee of the Army to " forthwith fur nish James Foord of Ipswich, a Souldjer under Capt. Brockle bank, now going up under Lieut. Swett to Narraganset, with one pr. of good shoos and on good Coate and place it to his accoV Ephraim Sawyer and Walter Davis, also, " now going forth to y e Narraganset," were furnished with apparel. These referred to in the above orders were a second body of recruits that were sent by the Massachusetts Council ; the Commissioners having voted, on January 6th, that the colonies should have recruits at head quarters at Smith s Garrison on or before January 20th. January 12th, a proposition came from the sachems for a cessa tion of hostilities for a month, which so stirred General Winslow s indignation and convinced him of their treachery, that he deter mined on a forward move at once, but still he felt his force to be too weak in the absence of the promised troops of Connecticut. He fears the foe is escaping, and sends frequent messages to the Commissioners and to Major Treat and the Connecticut Council, to hurry up their preparations. The Connecticut Colony meanwhile was making every 1 Capt. Brocklebank and the main part of his company probably entered the service January 1st, but did not march to the seat of war until other recruits were ready. January 18th, Capt. Daniel Fisher, of Dedham, has an order from the Council to send all " Horse and foote " that come into Dedham under Lieut. Benja. Swett, " away to yc Enemy ; " and the order shows Dedham to be the common rendezvous of the four counties. 202 KING PHILIP S WAR. endeavor, the while however being somewhat impatient of the urgency of the General, feeling that their own borders were threat ened by the Indians quite as much as the other colonies. Their archives afford ample proof of the thorough and energetic man ner of their preparation. Major Treat s reorganized army ren dezvoused at New London. From all the settlements recruits and arms and supplies were gathered as speedily as possible, and yet it was not until the 26th of January that their troops started for the field. The following extract relating to the occasion is from a " Letter of Major Palmer of New London to the Governor and Council of Connecticut." New London y e 26th Janua : 1675-6 I having this opportunity by Mr. Plom. could not omitt acquainting you of Maj r Treat s departure this day, with all his forces, who is accompanied with Mr Fitch, Mr Buckley & Mr. Wise. They expected to reach Badcock s this night and so get to Mr. Smith s tomorrow : For Major Treate hath had two late ord rs from the Generall one rece d on Lord s day, the other this morning, to hasten his coming; the Indyans being seated 8 or 10 miles northwest of Providence, and about 25 miles from Mr. Smith s. The information was gayned by two Indyans taken by a party of Capt Prentis troope, which killed nyne more one escaped there being 12 in that party. The Barke with the Provitions went out last night and hath had a fayre wind to carry her in today. They have added tenu barrels of meate to the twenty you ordered from Milford : weich doth afflict our people more than the trouble of quartering both well and wounded men, which have so impoverished them that sundry will much suffer, without y e speedy supply of corne for their releife. . . In the margin of this letter is added the item, Unkas has gone forth in person. It will be seen by the letter that the march from headquarters was begun on the 26th of January. James Babcock s place was in what is now Westerly, R.I. By good marching they could have reached Smith s Garrison and joined the main army on the evening of the 27th ; and thus January 28th must be the earliest date at which we can place the general forward movement of the whole army. The Council orders and references and letters in the Connecticut Colonial Records serve to confirm the account of Mr. Hubbard, although derived from independent sources, and as they give very few items besides, it seems evident that we have all of importance that happened. On January 23d Major Treat wrote to the Connecticut Council, quoting a letter from General Winslow, which he says he has lost, but which contained nothing of importance except to hasten their coming and " grateing on our disorderly retreat," and the good news of the taking of Joshua Tift by Capt. Fenner, of Providence. From some Indian JOSHUA TIFT S TESTIMONY. 203 prisoners which the Connecticut scouts had taken, it was found that the Narragansets were lying in small parties along the way leading into the Nipmuck country, and with scouting parties so posted that our army could not surprise their main body. From a letter of Roger Williams to Governor Leverett, dated Providence, 14 January, 1675, and published in the " Winthrop Papers," vol. 36, p. 307, Coll. Mass. Hist. Society, we learn much about this Joshua Tift, different from the accounts of contempo rary historians. Mr. Williams was called upon to take down the examination of Joshua Tift, and afterwards reports the answers to the Governor. Being questioned by Capt. Fenner, who had captured him, Tift answered that he had been with the Narragansets about twenty-seven days; that he was captured by Canonchet and his property destroyed, but his life saved on condition that he would become the slave of Canonchet ; he accepted the con ditions, and was taken to their fort and there compelled to work for the Indians. He testifies that the Mohegans and Pequots with our troops made terms with the Narragansets at the beginning, and shot over their heads. After the English entered the fort, Canonchet and other sachems fled and halted beside a spruce swamp after crossing a plain. When night came the word was brought to the chiefs of the English retreat, and they sent back to the fort to ascertain their losses, and found ninety-seven dead and forty-eight wounded, and five or six bodies of the English. He said that the Narragansets powder was mostly gone, but that Philip had sent word that he will furnish them enough from the French, who have sent Philip a present, "a brass gun and bandaliers sutable." The sachems are now about ten miles northwest from Mr. Smith s ; speaks of the squaw that was sent by the English, but that the sachems believed that the proposals of the English were merely a trap to catch them. Ca- nonicus was for peace, and would not consent to lie to the English ; but his nephew, the young sachem Canonchet (or Nariunteno) was fierce for war, and the young warriors were with him, so that it was impossible to curb them. He speaks of Quaquackis as Canonchet s chief captain, " a midling thick-set man of a very stout fierce countenance." " He saith that Philip is about Quawpaug, amongst a great many rocks by a Swampeside ; that the Nahi- gonsiks have bene these 3 days on their march & flight to Philip, that he knows not what number Philip hath with him, & that this day the last and rear of the company departed, that they heard that the Gen: was pursueing after them, & therefore several parties, to the number of 400 were ordered to lie in ambuscadoes, that several parties were left behind to get and drive cattell." He also testified that Ninigret s men fought the English in the fort, and that some of the Mohegans have joined the Narra gansets. 204 KING PHILIP S WAR. At last, the army, being in readiness, began the pursuit of the Indians towards the Nipmuck country, in the somewhat famous march known to the succeeding generations as the " Long March," or the " Hungry March," but of the details of which we have very meagre accounts. Mr. Hubbard relates that on January 21st Capt. Prentice sur prised a party of the Indians, killed nine and captured two, and within two or three days, the weather changing, our forces were very anxious to take the field, hearing, as they did, that the Indians were in full flight. " But so many difficulties were cast in the way that they could not be ready in time to prevent the mischief the Indians did at Warwick. For, January 27, they despoiled Mr. Carpenter of two hundred sheep, fifty head of neat cattle and fifteen horses, drove them all away safely and escaped before our forces set out." They wounded two of Mr. Car penter s people, and one of theirs was slain. They also drove away cattle from a Mr. Harris, and killed a negro servant of his. Mr. Church was at Rhode Island, wounded, and his son made the mistake, in publishing his story, of making his stay there three months instead of three weeks. When he was partly recovered from his wound, he went over to take leave of General Winslow, but was induced by him to go with the army, then about to march in pursuit of the enemy. He relates a battle at an " Indian town of many wigwams," which was surrounded by an " icy swamp," and when the English succeeded in passing over this, " after much firing," the enemy made good their retreat. It is evident that the Mohegans did most of the effective fighting here ; and very little execution was done besides in the pursuit, except that by Capt. Fenner s party from Providence. It seems to have been the popular idea that the army of the united colonies, after the junction of the Connecticut troops, numbered about sixteen hundred, horse and foot. I have not been able to find any definite official statement, but as nearly as can be determined from available data, Massachusetts sent out about three hundred fresh troops in January ; Connecticut, includ ing her veterans and Indian allies, about five hundred ; and Plymouth probably about one huridred. With allowance for the dead, wounded and disabled of Massachusetts and Plymouth, about two hundred ; sixty left in garrison at Wickford, and there would be, at a rough estimate, fourteen hundred serviceable men at Narraganset on January 28. It will be noticed that Tift s evidence is that Philip is " about Quawpaug amongst a great many rocks by a Swampeside," and this may be taken as the supposed objective point or rendezvous of the Indians. The rear guard of the Indians were, at the date of his trial, or when he was captured, prowling about the settle ments at Patuxit and Providence for an opportunity to drive off cattle, which purpose they succeeded in carrying out, some days " THE HUNGRY MARCH." 205 later, when the witness, who in this matter at least had given true testimony, had been " hung and quartered." The route of the main body of the Indians was in a northwest direction towards Quaboag, probably though the Wabbequasset country (now Wood stock) to the old Quaboag fort. Capt. Henchman, in the Mount Hope campaign, August, 1675, had marched into the Nipmuck country as far as the "second fort," at a place called" Waposo- shequish " (probably Wabbaquasset), and then turned aside and marched to Mendon. In a direct line Woodstock is about forty miles from Wickford ; by the regular trail it was doubtless much farther. In midwinter, with their scant knowledge of the country, with swollen streams to cross, an alert foe forever van ishing into the great wilderness, and eluding attack or luring to ambuscade, with provisions which the long waiting for Connecti cut had served to reduce, their march was a hazardous undertak ing, and probably was inspired by the hope of striking a final blow against their enemies, already reduced to great straits for pro visions, arms and ammunition. They found " more than sixty horses heads " at one place, probably at the late rendezvous of the Indians, " 25 miles north of Mr. Smith s and 10 miles north of Providence." Finding his provisions growing short, and his men worn with their long march and severe exposure, and seeing no prospect of bringing the enemy to a battle, General Winslow determined to abandon the pursuit, when the Indians betook themselves to the wilderness beyond Quaboag. I think the march commenced from Wickford on January 28, and it was probably on February 2d or 3d that the skirmish took place. It seems that the Connecticut and Indian forces were dismissed as early as February 3d, as they arrived home on the 5th, while the cavalry of Massachusetts and Plymouth reached Boston on the same day, the infantry remaining over at Marlborough, but a part of them marching down to Bos ton the next day. They were reduced to such straits that they killed and ate many of their horses, and the march was thence called by the people " the Hungry March." XV. CAPT. SAMUEL BROCKLEBANK S COMPANY AND MARLBOROUGH GARRISON. SAMUEL BROCKLEBANK, of Rowley, is said to have been born in England about 1630, and to have come to this country with his mother Jane, a widow, and his brother John. Samuel Brocklebank and his wife Hannah had children Samuel, born 1653 ; Francis, born 1655 ; Hannah, Mary, Elizabeth, Sarah, and Joseph who was born in 1674. He was appointed deacon of the first church in Rowley in 1665. Elected captain of the Foot Company of Rowley in 1673. Was active in recruit ing for the Narraganset campaign, and after the fort fight, on the second call for recruits, went out with a company about Jan uary 1st, as I judge from his credits, and those corresponding credits of his men, which according to my best estimates were for five weeks, up to February 5th, when they returned to Boston, and reckoned from the time they left Rowley. These are only infer ences, however, drawn from the Journal and various casual ref erences, and I have yet found no direct statement as to the officers and men who went out to Narraganset at the second call, and I have not found any mention of Capt. Brocklebank or other officers whom I shall credit with such service. After the return to Boston, Capt. Brocklebank, with his company, within one week was called to Marlborough, where he was placed in command of the garrisons and military operations, and remained until April 21st, when he marched to Sudbury, with Capt. Wadsworth and his company, where they were ambushed by the Indians, and both captains, with most of their men, were slain. The account of this battle is in the Capt. Wadsworth chapter, as he was in command. After the death of Capt. Brocklebank, his widow married Richard Dole, of Newbury. His descendants of the name are quite numerous by his son Samuel and Elizabeth Platts his wife ; by his daughters Mary and Sarah, who married William and Henry, sons of Richard Dole ; and by his daughter Hannah, who married John Stickney. Soldiers credited under Capt. Samuel Brocklebank : February 29 th 1675-6 Samuel Mower 01 08 04 Joseph Parker 01 10 00 Rowland Ravensbee 01 07 04 John Abbott 01 10 00 OAPT. BROCKLEBANK/S COMPANY. 207 March 24 th 1675-6 Thomas Stamford 01 John Wilson 01 Philip Butler 02 John Linsy 01 John Humkins 02 SamuelBrocklebankCapt.07 John Hobson 01 John Woodin 01 Benjamin Peirson 01 Daniel Tenny 01 John Jackson 01 John Wood 01 April 24 th 1676 James Ford 01 John Giddings 03 Peter Jennings 01 John Pollard 01 June 24, 1676 Richard Potter 02 Peter Jennings 04 John Lovejoy 01 Jonathan Emery 03 Josiah Clark 06 Henry Cooke 00 Samuel Ireson 04 Simon Adams 04 Moses Bennett 03 John Burrell 03 Thomas Brown 04 John Wood 03 Francis Gefford 03 Nath. Pease 05 Samuel Hills 02 10 00 10 00 01 00 10 00 02 00 10 00 10 00 16 00 10 08 10 00 10 00 10 00 15 00 00 00 15 00 10 10 02 00 16 00 10 00 12 00 06 00 10 00 04 00 11 08 18 10 06 00 03 00 19 08 18 00 08 00 16 00 Simon Groe 03 09 04 Nicholas Richardson 03 09 04 Robert Rand 01 10 00 Richard Haven 01 10 00 James Day 01 17 08 Daniel Hutchins 03 10 00 SamuelBrocklebankCapt.14 11 00 July 24 th 1676 John Brown 02 08 00 Nathaniel Stephens 02 09 06 Zechariah Ayres 01 10 00 Richard Bryan 08 11 00 Thomas Kemball 02 08 00 Philip Kertland 01 12 06 John Stanwood 01 02 00 Philip Stanwood 03 08 06 Robert Pease 03 12 00 Thomas Baker 05 09 06 Benjamin Jones 01 16 00 Joseph Fellows 01 17 00 John Lynd 05 09 06 Joshuah Boynton 05 10 04 August 24 th 1676. Jonathan Fantom 05 10 12 Peter Chever 03 04 00 Samuel Perkins 03 18 00 Richard Jacob 14 15 10 Sept 23 d 1676 Richard Prince 02 11 04 Samuel Peirce 00 18 00 James Chafe 01 12 06 Edward Sewery 02 02 00 Michael Derick 10 00 00 Capt. Brocklebank wrote from Marlborough to Gen. Denison, March 27, 1676, asking that he and his company may be relieved to go home, giving his reason that they had been in the country s service " since the first of January at Narraganset, and within one week after their returne were sent out again, having neither time nor money (save a fortnight s pay upon the march) to recruite themselves." THE GARRISON AT MARLBOROUGH. Okkokonimesit was what Major Daniel Gookin called, and Ognonikongquamesit was the name by which Mr. Eliot knew, the " Praying Indian Village," situated within the limits of what became the town of Marlborough. The first English settlers went from the parent plantation of Sudbury. The Court s grant to the Indians through Mr. Eliot, in 1654, being prior to that 208 KINO PHILIP S WAK. made to the English, the latter found to their disappointment that this Indian reserve, right in the midst of their own grant, must be respected by them if they wished to retain their own rights ; for it is to the credit of the Massachusetts Council, that its mem bers were, almost without exception, in favor of upright and humane dealing with the friendly Indians. These Indians above, were a branch of the Wamesit tribe, it is said, and had submitted to the Massachusetts Colony as early as 1643, and had received assurance of its protection of their rights. In 1674 this Indian town contained ten families, and about fifty souls. They were self-supporting, peaceable, and were becoming industrious and thrifty, but were evidently regarded with contempt and distrust by many of the neighboring English, who grudged them the posses sion of their grant of six thousand acres, including some of the best land in the township. The Indian name of the locality was something like Whipsup- penick, but this became corrupted with the English settlers to " Whipsufferage." The town was incorporated as Marlborough in 1660. The first actual English settler was John Howe, who settled in 1657- 8 ; and at the division of land, in 1660, there were thirty-eight who were then, or soon after, residents. Rev. Wm. Brimsmead was settled as their minister, and the new plantation flourished fairly until the breaking out of Philip s War. At this time, being a frontier town, it was exposed to attacks from all directions, and being situated upon the road to Connecticut, it had been regarded by the General Court as a point of military advantage, and a fort had been built, and a small garrison was kept there. Upon the outbreak of Philip s War, the retreat of Philip and his followers to the Nipmucks, and the consequent disturbance of the neighboring tribes, the people of Marlborough, under the lead of their minister, met early in Octo ber, and adopted measures of defence in addition to that afforded by the garrison which was under the command of Lieut. John Ruddock, of whose conduct of their military affairs, his towns men, it seems, were jealous ; and the people, as was the case gener ally, were averse to the presence of the soldiers in their houses. After hostilities began, the Praying Indians, who had lived so long beside the settlers, became objects of suspicion and, in many instances, of unreasoning persecutions, in spite of the constant remonstrances of their friends, Rev. John Eliot, Major Gookin and the magistrates and leading men generally. Philip used all his powers of persuasion and intimidation to draw these Praying or Christian Indians to his side ; but in spite of his arts, and the bitter popular prejudices of the English, and although forced to suffer great injustice and hardships, they were nearly all faithful to their engagements with the Colonists. The " new praying villages," which under Mr. Eliot s efforts were established, FRIENDLY INDIANS PERSECUTED. 209 in the way of missionary stations, in the vicinity of several neigh boring tribes, were broken up by the " rumors of war," and the real converts came with their families into the older villages under the protection of the Colony. The Indian village at Marlborough was increased to about forty men, besides women and children, and under the direction of the English, they built a fort of considerable strength for themselves, and were furnished with ammunition and some with arms by the government, and others had suitable arms of their own. There is no doubt that these Indians were well disposed and faithful with very few excep tions, and might have been of very great help in all the subsequent movements of the war, if the headstrong prejudices of the people had not frightened and antagonized them in manifold ways. The hostile Indians sought to fix the stigma of their own depre dations, often committed for that very purpose, upon the Christian Indians ; and the attack upon Lancaster, Aug. 22, 1675, in which seven persons were killed, was attributed to them by " Indian David," who was tied up to a tree and forced to implicate somebody, himself having fallen under suspicion of shooting the Irish shep herd boy at Marlborough just before this. Those whom David particularly accused were the Hassanemesit Indians, now gathered into the Indian fort at Marlborough ; and the popular clamor was so loud against them that Lieut. John Ruddock, in command of the garrison at Marlborough, demanded the arms and ammunition of the whole body of Indians to be given up. This demand was quietly acceded to, although there was no evidence against the Indians, and the act was entirely without the sanction of the Court ; but the prejudices of the people were so strong, and their clamors so persistent, that Capt. Mosely, then in the vicinity with his company of sixty men, was appealed to, and nothing loth, under cover of his authority, gave the Indian fort up to the plunder and abuse of his soldiery. Fifteen of the Indians were arrested and sent down to Boston, tied neck to neck like galley- slaves, and the integrity of the Council was sorely taxed to keep the rage of the populace from executing these poor creatures without trial ; but the law did prevail, and after a long trial and imprisonment at Boston of the eleven(out of the fifteen) who were accused, all were fully acquitted except their first accuser, David, who was condemned for the suspicion as to the shepherd boy, and also for his false accusations, and also the Indian Joseph Spoonant, tried by another jury ; these two were condemned to be sold out of the country as slaves. This persecution seems to have broken up the Indian settlement at Marlborough. In the meantime the garrison at Marlborough became a ren dezvous for the troops going and coming to and from the western towns, and while it was occupied by soldiers the people felt some degree of security in their homes ; but when the com panies were drawn off they felt the danger of their exposed con- 210 KING PHILIP S WAR. dition, and after the disasters of Captains Beers and Lothrop, and the experiences of Springfield, Deerfield, etc., they resolved upon measures for better security. Upon October 1st they were called together, and took action as shown in the following paper preserved in the Massachusetts Archives, vol. 67, p. 277. Maryborough the : 1 : of October : 1675. At a meeting of the inhabetants in order to take care for the safty of our town these following proposals were Agreed upon And volen- taryly chosen unto that in case of asalt these places heare After men tioned should be defended by the persons that are expressed by name that is in William Kerly s hous. of the town soulders : 2 : or soulders allowed to the town John How senior John ffay Thomas Marten Thomas How Joseph "Wait Thomas King John Wetherbe John Mainard John Brigham In Serjant Woods his hous of the town Souldeers-2 6 of the New- tons, or solders Allowed to the town John Woods Junior Isack How James Woods John Bellows Isack Woods Samuel Bellows At Joseph Rices Samuel Stow John Barret Samuel Rice In John Johnson s hous : 9 : and of the town Souldears 3 : In Deacon Wards hous of the town soulders-3 or soulders allowed the towne his own family 3 Abraham How Gershom Yearns William Taylor Samuel Ward In Abraham Williams his house of the town soulders-3 or soulders allowed the towne Richard Barnes John Rediat Junior John Rideat Senior Samuel Brigham John Rooks In Thomas Rices hous of the town soulders 2 or soulders allowed to the town John Brown John Bowser Peter Rice Increas Ward Thomas Rice Junior And three men of Peter Bents To the Lef tenant him self and the magazeen : 13 : of the soulders that weare allowed to the town to John Johnson : 3 : to Deacon Ward 3 to Serjant Woods ) . to Abraham Williams 3 And William Kerly ) to Thomas Rice 3 All these men to be maintained in their respective percels by the fam- ilyes In the several fortifications where they are placed. Also that the ammunition of the town hould be proportioned to the soulders of the town in these fortifications ; this Above written is that which Acted and Assented unto by the persons whos names are sub scribed. Mr Brensmead Thomas Rice Josias How Deacon Ward John Johnson John Mainard LIEUT. RUDDUCK S LETTERS. 211 Thomas King Samuel Rice John Rediat Solomon Johnson John Bellows John ffay Abraham How Nathaniel Johnson Moses Newton John How senior John Woods Junior Richard Barnes John Woods senior Joseph Newton James Taylor Richard Newton Thomas Barnes William Kerly Abraham Williams This Above writen was the Act of the town Agreeing with the Act of the Comettee of melecti as Attest William Kerly clarke That this action was somewhat in opposition to the wishes of the military officer of the garrison, Lieut. John Rudduck, is proved by his letter below, from the Archives, vol. 68, p. 4 : Letter of Lieut. John Rudduck to the Council. For the honored Councell Honored Sirs. After my humble Duty p r esented these are to in- forme the honored Councill that Capt. Pool have sent to me four times for things spesefied in the note inclosed which I had none of but bread and liquors w ch he have had but the other things I have none of and now the Rum is all gon he have had several gallons of Rum all Redy and the souldirs and posts passinge to and agen and the army have had the Rest alsoe our men at the garison want shoos and stockins and shurts very much they complaine to me dayly to goe home and suply themselves but I dare not let them goe becaus sum have gon on that acount and Com not againe namly John Boudage of Roxbury and John Orres a smeth of Boston and on Samuell Castin is Run away I sent to M r Davison to aquaint athority with it but I heare noe more of it heare is but littell of anythinge Left in the Magaseen and if it please the hono r d Councell to give me order to remove what is left to my hous it would be less trouble to me and if anything be sent I may have it heare at my own hous I have set the garison soulders to fortify about my hous now they have fortified the Magaseen all Ready by my order and soe I intend to imply them for the defense of the Town I humbly pray this honored Councell to send a suply for the soulders heare and at quoboag or derection how they shall be suplyed. Capt. Wayt commanded me to returne James Cheavers for absenting himself after he had prest him whom I have sent to make his own defence. Your humble servant, Marlborough Octob : y e 1 st , 1675. JOHN RUDDUCK Sum of the gareson souldirs Informed me when I was geting to scale my letter that the Constable had been this morning and warned the soul ders to com to me for theire vectls for the Town would diet them no longer I desire derection in this case and allsoe that he had warned them that did quarter them to quarter them no more JOHN RUDDUCK. I am of Nesessity constrained to provid victles for them till I heare from the Councell how they will order it. Capt. Poolers requisition, enclosed in the above letter. To the Comisary at Malbery Sur we want drawers and wastcots and I am forsed to let men goe home to fetch clothing becas they want and 212 KING PHILIP S WAR. have no supply Sur I pray send sum soft tobacow and bred by thos persons I pray send me the runlit of lickours for the army will drene us doutles not els but rest yours date 30 : 7 th : 75 JONATHAN POOLE Capt. Another letter from him is in Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 279: Second Letter of Lieut. John Rudduck to the Council. For the honoured Governor & Council. Honored Sir After my humble Duty p r sented these are to signify to this honored Councel that upon hearinge the Councell was Informed the Constable had f orbed the men that were quarteered in the town and sent them to me for quarter sum cam to me this morninge and threatened me if the men were taken away I should Answer it and many threateninge words and many were gathered together about it I understand great Complaints are like to be made against me to the Couucell but I hope the honoured Councell will have Charity for me till I can com to Answer for myself : in Regard to the charge of the town and of the Country. I cannot with convenience come down the charge of the mageseen beinge committed to me troubles me very much they are offended that I bringe the souldiers to meetinge with me and say 1 must have soe many men to gard me it well known to many that it have bene my practise ever since I have had a family I use to have them to meetiuge with me I thiuke it my duty having a garison of Souldiers to have them to meet ing with mee allsoe I sect sum of them the on half to gard the Town in the forenoon and the other in the Afternoon and them that do not ward I have to meeting with me : when we met together to apoynt houses to be ffortified I would have had houses apoynted and men apoynted to these houses but the Insign would not yeald to that but would have the town caled together to see what houses they were will- inge to goe to and to fortify soe the designe was that my house should not be ffortified nor have any gard if danger be they themselves will have the Inhabitants to gard theire houses but if I have any I must have of the soulders and be at Charges to maintaine them myself I have propounded to them that the Inhabitants be equally devided to the houses that are to be garded and the garison soulders divided like wise but they would not yeld to that soe unless the honoured Councell be plesed to determiu this thinge it will not be determined sum have manedged theire maters soe that I have Leetle or noe comand of the Inhabitants of the town the sum of all is there are that cannot swolow that pill that I should have so much trust aud pour commeted to me soe I desire to leve myself with God and this honored Councell The pore leve themselves with God Your humble Seruaut Marlborough this 4 Octo 1675 JOHN RDDDUCK. When the army returned from the Narraganset campaign, and most of the troops were discharged at Boston, Feb. 5, 1675-6, we learn from Gen. Gookin s " History of the Christian Indians " that Capt. Wadsworth with his company was left at Marlborough " to strengthen that frontier." He remained there until early in March, when the newly levied army was gathered there under the GEN. DENISON AND CAPT. BROCKLEBANK. 213 command of Major Thomas Savage, and was organized under the immediate personal inspection of Maj. Gen. Daniel Denison. It was at this time that Capt. Mosely s haughty and unrebuked insubordination, backed up by the lawless, Indian-hating element of the army, occurred, and gave the commanders so much diffi culty ; for when Job Kattenanit, a friendly Indian, whose fidelity had been proved by successful and faithful report of the condition of the hostile Indians, to whom he with James Quannapohit had been sent as a spy, and, in order to keep faith with the English, had left his wife and children in the hands of the hostiles and returned to our army, bringing information which, if it had been heeded, would have saved great destruction and suffering, when this man had been given a permit to go and bring in his family, who were to meet him on a certain day, Capt. Mosely raised such a hue and cry that the commanders were obliged to submit, and sent after him at once. The course of events in the town, including the attack, is shown in the following letters : Capt. BrocJclebank s Letter to the Council. Much Honnored sirs. Malborough 28 of : 1 : 1676 After the duty I owe unto your Honnor this may let you understand that the assault the enemy made upon the towne of Malborough upon sabbath day did much dammage as the inhabbitants say, to the burning of 16 dwelling houses besides about 13 barnes and seemingly did indeaver to draw out the men out of the garisons but we not knowing ther numbers and our charge of the Countries ammunition and provis- sion durst not goe out then on Sabbath day night there came about 20 men from Sudbury and we out of the severall garrison drew out about twenty more and in the night they went out to see if they could discover the enemy and give theme some checke in ther proceeding who found them laid by ther fires and fired on them and they run away at present but the number being few and not knowing the number of the enemie but aprehending by ther noyse and fireing at them they indeavored to compass them in the returne home without any losse of any man or wound from the enemie only one of my men by the breaking of his gun his hand is sorely shattered which for want of helpe here I have sent to Charlestowne or elsewhere in the bay where your honnors may thinke best for his helpe : we have great cause to acknowledge the goodnesse of God toward us for his gracious preservation of us the enemye is gone at the p r sent as we aprehend by the scouts that went out yesterday the which we may expect eare long will fall on us with greater strength and rage by reason of the breakfast that they had on Monday morning the scouts found only one indian dead thus in briefe your honnors will under stand how it is with us : from him who is your honnors servant SAMUELL BROCKLEBANKE Capt Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 180. 214 KING PHILIP S WAR. General Daniel Denison s Letter, S r . Yesterday I received a letter from Capt. Brocklebanck at Marl- borough signifying his desire of being dismissed with his company the reasons he alleadges are 1. their necessities & wants having beene in the countryes service ever since the first of January at Narriganset & within one weeke after their return were sent out againe having neither time nor money (save a fortnights paye upon their march) to recruite themselves 2. he saith they doe little where they are: & he under stands they are called off by the Council. I shall make bould to request the like favor in the behalf e of those (at least) some of those troopers & dragoons of Essex that went out last, intended for Hadley but by reason of the disaster at Groton diverted to Concord &c. to beate of & prosecute the enemy in those parts and I directed orders to Major Willard, that with those he first tooke up w th him & then sent, together with the garrisons at Marlborough Lancaster & Chelmsford (if need more) in all above 200 men he might not only defend the townes but might prosecute the enemy there, being within 2 dayes march, but I heare of no such attempt nor indeed of any considerable improvement of them that hath beene, or is like to be. I am therefore sollicitous for many of them that out of a respect to myself went willingly, hoping of a speedy returne to their families and occasions some of them more than ordinary great and urgent I intreate therefore they may be p r sently considered & eased to attend the seed time &c. and if there be necessity that others may be sent in their roomes, who may with far less detriment be spared. The stockade from Watertowne to Wamesit, might better be from Watertowne to Sudbury river 9 miles taking in more country, & that river being as good a stop as the stockade the greatest objection is Merrimack river though broad yet I understand is fordable in 20 places betweene Wamesit & Haveril, & cannot be safe without guards w ch must be kept upon it, for hast I Jumble many things, w ch be pleased to pardon The Lord Look in mercy upon his poore distressed people upon your selves in particular so prayes your humble Servant Ips March 27: 1676 DANIEL DENISON. The inclosed are certificates of delinquents on the last press in Norfolk & of the troopers that should have gone with Capt. Whipple to Hadley Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 179. First Letter of the Council to Lieut. Jacob. Left Jacob. The Council having lately receaved Information of Gods further frowne upon us in taking and depriving the Country both of y r Captaine and Capt Wadsworth w" 1 severall others by permitting the enemy to destroy them yesterday so y l y r Capt. Brocklebauke s chardge is devolved on y r self The Councel judge meet to leave the souldiers under his charge to yo r care and chardge, and doe order you to take the care and chardge of the sayd Company that you be vigilant & diligent in that place & as seasonably and speedily as you cann to give Information to y e Councel of the state, numbers & condition of LIEUT. JACOB AT MARLBOKOUGH. 215 y r souldiers in that Garrison under y r command desiring God s Grace & blessing to be w th you. Remayne yo r loving freinds EDW. RAWSON, Secretary. Boston 22 Aprill 1676 by Order of the Council Postscript, you are alike ordered to take care & command of the place (ie) Marlborrow to preserve it what in you lyes. EDW. RAWSON, Secretary Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 222. like order Lieut. Richard Jacob s First Letter. from Malbary y e 22 April 1676. Hono r d Sirs This morning aboute Sun two hours high y e Enimie Alarmed us by firing & Shooting towards y e Lowermost Garason Next Sudbury, which made us feare y l Garason to be in Danger which shoot ing we afterward understood was y e Enimie killing off Cattle. Some after they gave a shout & Came in sight upon y c Indian hill great Numbers of them & one as their accustomed maner is after a fight, began to signifie to us how many were slaine. They Cohoop d seventy- four times, which we hoped was only to affright us seing we have had no intelegence of any such thing, yet we have Reason to feare the worst Considering Theire Numbers which we aprehended to be five hundred at y e least others Thinke a thousand y e most of y em hasted toward y e Northwest side of y e towne firing y e Remainder of y e Garason houses & others y l were deserted as they went : they have been hunt ing in al quarters of y e towne to kill & take what Cattle were without Comand of y e four Garasons That yet Remain. Severall of y e further most houses of this town next Sudbury have bin fired now toward Night which gives Reason to Thinke that y e Enimie is not yet De parted from us : Thus I thought it my Duty to give a briefe account of y e present proceedings of y e Euimie : to your Honuours Leaving itt with your wisdoms Consideration. Beging pardon for This my Boulduess I Remaine your Honoures Humble Servant RICHARD JACOB. Attached to the above letter is Secretary Rawson s Copy of an Order of the Council, as follows : Lef tenant Jacob, yesterday upon the Councils having the sad intel egence of y or Capt. & Capt. Wadsworth death ordered your taking the charge of the souldgers at Malborough since w ch I received your of 22 Apr. giving intelegence of the enemyes infesting y or quarters & apearance in a boddy of at least 500 & these wasting by fyers what they can come at so driving cattle, yesterday was ordered eighty troopers to advance to observe the motions of the enemy y or twoe souldgers returne w th a p ty of horse to Sudbery & so with these to you I desyer your vigilance & care for the preserving your men & what is under your charge & you shal have ffurther orders so soone as the Councell meete, desyring Gods presence with and assistance of you, 23, 2, 76. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 223. 216 KING PHILIP S WAR. Lieutenant Richard Jacob s Second Letter. Maryborough 24. Aprill 1676. Honoured Sirs, Having now Received Information of God s ffurther frowns on y e Country In Suffering two Such worthy Captaines to fall before y e Enimie whome we might have hop to have bin Instruments of more good in these troublous times : But In this God s will is Done. Receiving an Order from your Honours wherein your Honours are pleased to Devolve y c charge and betrustment of our late Capt. Brockle- banke upon me, for which I am sensible of my Inefficiency & Incapacity, yet Since tis your Honours pleasure, to Require me to Certifie your Honours of y e state of y e soldeirs & of y e place. That I shall Readyly, here is Remaining of our Company about fourty-six, Several whereofe are young soldiers left here by Capt Wadsworth being unable to march. The Towne is wholy consumed Excepting four Garasons that were man d when the Enimie was last with us, all y e cattle without Reach of The garasons are Lost : one of y e Garason Houses which was Judg d to be most fitt by our Captaine : who your Honours did apoynt to order according to his Discretion for a stated garason now burnt by Reason off y e Inhabitants not attending thereunto Every one being Carful to Secure his private Interest, here is only Remaining These two houses where the Magazine Lyes That are in a Capacity to assist each other. y c other two Lying att a greater Distance with other Inconveniences. May it please your Honours further to Order of y e state of our Com pany being Generally such as live upon Husbandry & seed time being now far spent which may be prejudiciall to ourselves & others if y e season so slipt. But I shall leave that to your Honours Consideration only begging pardon for my bouldnes I Rest your Honours Servant to my utmost ability RICHARD JACOB Postscript : Some of y e principle of y e Towns men In the behalf e of y c Rest y l are yet Remaining which are but few Would Desire your Hon ours to Consider their present Condition being altogether incapable for Remaining without assistance both with Carts & a Guard They are destitute of Carts Their Teames being at Sudburie & not Daring to Returne. Removing of theire goods if your Honours see meete to Grant it or otherwise willing to refer their loss to your Honours further Consideration. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 227. Most of the inhabitants deserted their farms after the destruc tion of the town on March 26, 1676, and with the exception of a few families who remained for a time in the garrisoned houses, the families came to the towns nearer Boston, and returned only after the war was over. The garrison was maintained until the close of the war, and was an important rendezvous for the forces. Soldiers Credited with Military Service at the Garrison at Marlborough September 21 st 1675 Darby Morris 01 13 04 John Dunster 02 00 00 William Turner 01 19 04 Thomas Owen 04 13 04 Joseph Barber 02 14 00 LIEUT. JACOB AT MARLBOROUGH. 217 October 19 th 1675 James Cheevers 02 14 00 Thomas Turner 02 12 00 William Blackwell 03 02 06 Henry Gibbs Richard Roberts 03 07 00 04 04 00 November 20 1675 Timothy Laskin William Ferman 04 13 04 02 08 00 Samuel French 03 00 00 Richard Young Daniel Roff 03 12 00 03 02 00 Jacob Adams 04 13 04 Jonathan Jackson 04 13 04 Daniel Weight 04 13 04 John Figg 01 10 00 John Broughton 02 12 02 January 25 th 1675-6 John Baker 03 08 06 Richard Young Henry Gibbs John Nash 03 06 00 02 19-00 00 18 00 Jonathan Jackson 01 05 08 Obadiah Searle 06 08 00 Daniel Davison, Commissary, 05 14 00 Jonathan Orris 03 12 00 Richard Roberts 02 16 06 William Turner 04 16 00 February 29, 1675-6 Robert Rownden 07 04 00 Thomas Owen 02 18 02 William Farman 03 17 00 Gustin John 01 19 04 March 24 th 1675-6 Richard Young 00 13 00 April 24 th 1676 Thomas Hopkins 00 09 00 Benjamin Parmater 02 03 08 June 24 th 1676 Daniel Weight 02 09 08 Thomas Dennis 01 05 06 July 24 th 1676 Timothy Laskin 02 09 08 John Burges 03 00 10 September 23 d 1676 Morgan Jones 08 02 00 Joseph Davis 06 00 00 XVI. CAPT. SAMUEL WADSWORTH AND THE SUDBURY FIGHT, THE last chapter closed the account of affairs at the garrison at Marlborough during and immediately after the fight at Sudbury, with the letters of Lieut. Richard Jacob, upon whom the command of the garrison devolved after Captain Brocklebank s death. And it is well to bear in mind that, be tween the time of the requests of Gen. Denison and Capt. Brockle- bank, that the garrison might be relieved to go home, etc., and these letters of Lieut. Jacob, the new army under Major Savage had marched out from Marlborough to the Connecticut River, driving the main body of the hostile Indians beyond that river, as was supposed, but, as was found afterwards, leaving a great number gathered near Mount Wachuset. After operating till about March 28th in defence of the western towns, he was ordered to leave one hundred and fifty men under command of Capt. Turner, and return home as far as Marlborough, and await further orders. By an order of the Council, passed April 10, 1676, Major-Gen. Denison was to meet and dispose the returning troops at Marlborough. In the meantime the Indians, closely watching the movements of our forces, and alert to strike at every exposed point, on Sun day, March 26th, attacked Marlborough, as we see by Capt. Brocklebank s letter, and burned a large part of the town. The garrisons were unable, or feared, to attack them in force ; but that night, Lieut. Jacob of Captain Brocklebank s company, with twenty of his men and twenty volunteers, coming up from Sudbury, followed and surprised the Indians sleeping by their fires, and killed some of them, though it is not known how many. Mr. Hubbard says they wounded thirty, fourteen of whom died the same day or soon after, and popular rumor, as usual, exag gerated the number, and in this case made it seventy. It is nec essary now to go back and bring the personal account of Capt. Wadsworth up even with the general matters related above. Capt. Samuel Wadsworth was the son of Christopher, who came from England in the ship Lion, it is said ; was settled in Duxbury in 1632 with wife Grace (Cole), and had four children, CAPT. WADSWORTH S FAMILY. 219 who, in their mother s will, 1688, are named in order, viz., Joseph, Samuel, Mary and John, and the last was born 1638. Capt. Samuel moved to Milton about 1656 and selected a large tract of land in the centre of that town, and settled there with his wife Abigail, daughter of James Lindall, of Duxbury. Their children, born between 1659 and 1674, were Ebenezer, Chris topher, Timothy, Joseph, Benjamin, Abigail, and John, whose descendants have honored the name in their generations. Of these, Ebenezer and Christopher settled in Milton, where the latter died in 1687, aged about 24 years. Benjamin, born 1670, graduated, Harvard College, 1690 ; ordained minister of First Church in Boston, September 8, 1696 ; elected president of Harvard College in 1725, and died 1737. John Wadsworth, youngest son of Capt. Samuel, was born in 1674 ; became a prominent citizen of Milton ; had a family of twelve children, of whom his second son, Benjamin, built a house now standing in Milton. Capt. E. D. Wadsworth, a lineal de scendant, now lives on a part of the original estate of Capt. Samuel. Agreeably to the order of the Commissioners of the United Colonies to raise one thousand men to continue the war against the Indians, passed at Boston, December 25th, Massachusetts, on the 28th, issued orders for impressing three hundred men forth with; Essex 105, Middlesex 83, Suffolk 112; the time and place of rendezvous being January 5th, at Dedham. Of the recruits that were sent out at this time, Capt. Samuel Wadsworth, the subject of the present chapter, commanded one company. There is no published reference to such service, and only the casual mention in Gen. Gookin s account of the " Pray ing Indians," and by the writer of the pamphlet " News from New England," to the effect that, when the army returned to Marl- borough, and the rest of the forces were dismissed, " Capt. Wadsworth with his company was left at Marlborough." The garrisons from all the frontier towns, save such as the inhabitants furnished, had been withdrawn by an order of the Council, January 14th. There is no mention of Capt. Wads- worth until the return to Marlborough, and therefore our account of him and his company must begin there ; they, having taken part in the " Hungry March " from Narraganset, were now left to bear the brunt of any attack the Indians nu ght make upon the frontiers. On February 6th the Council issued an order to Major Appleton, then at Marlborough with the returned army, to dismiss the soldiers to their several homes, " as soone as the Sabbath is past. But it will be remembered that Gen. Winslow, now in command of the army, and under the pressure of the lack of provisions, would scarcely wait for this order, and probably marched to Bos ton on February 5th, with at least a large proportion of his army. 220 KING PHILIP S WAR. Rev. Increase Mather, living in Boston at the time, and deeply interested in all these affairs, writes in his history : " Feb. 5th, the Army returned to Boston not having obtained the end of their going forth ; " while the anonymous contemporary writer of the pamphlet above mentioned, states that " Major Gen. Wins- low only with his Troops (marched) to Boston, leaving the Foot at Malbury and South-bury, who came home on Munday follow ing and were all dismist to their several Habitations except Capt. Wads worth, who was left at Malbury in pursuit of the Enemy of whom he destroyed about 70 Old Men Women and Children, who wanted strength to follow the fugitive Army." l Hull s treasury accounts agree with this date of the disbanding of the army, so that Capt. Wadsworth s operations on the frontiers, with his head quarters at Marlborough, began doubtless on the same day. On February 10th a large body of Indians fell upon Lancaster and burned near half the town, consisting of about fifty families, but succeeded in capturing only one of the garrison houses, of which there were several. The one captured was that of Rev. Joseph Rowlandson, who was himself absent at the time in Boston, seeking assistance from the Council for the threatened town. The house was sufficiently garrisoned, but the enemy succeeded in setting fire to the rear portion, and forced all within to surrender or die, as the house was quickly burned to the ground. Forty-two persons were thus made prisoners, most of whom were women and children. As soon as the news of this attack upon Lancaster reached Marlborough, Capt. Wads worth mustered a company of about forty men of his garrison and hastened to the rescue of the remaining part of the town. On one side the Indians had cut off the approach of assistance, as they supposed, by tearing off the planks from the bridge ; but the English readily repaired this and passed over, and by a secret way were led into the town, where they succeeded in driving off the enemy. During the rest of this month Capt. Wads worth and his men were employed scouting along the frontier, with headquarters chiefly at Marlborough, I think, where Capt. Brocklebank was in command, whose company, dismissed on February 5th, had been called again into service upon the news of the assault upon Lan caster. An order of the Council, dated February llth, appoints Capt. Samuel Wadsworth ; Robert Badcocke, Sergeant ; and " those that are at present selectmen " a council of militia for 1 This -writer is unreliable in his account of the war, and in attributing this last exploit to Capt. Wadsworth undoubtedly confuses things in mixing the rescue of Lancaster by him with the mid night surprise of Indians March 27th, by Lieut. Jacob. But while his direct statements are to be received with caution, his casual references are valuable as hints of existing facts which others do not mention, and many of which, confirmed by evidence gleaned from the Archives, throw light upon things which have hitherto been entirely unknown in history ; for instance, this reference to Capt. Wadsworth, together with Major Gookin s mention, is the only hint, in published accounts, that connects him with the Narraganset campaign, and in these references there is only inferential evidence, and in regard to Capt. Brocklebank there is absolutely no reference until the present investigations based upon Treasurer Hull s accounts; but following up the clues, there is plenty of evidence in the Archives of, these officers and others having had part in this campaign, that have never been mentioned in connection with it. CAPT. WADSWORTH AND SOLDIERS. 221 Milton ; and this would seem to indicate the design of the Coun cil to keep Capt. Wadsworth upon the home frontiers, as will further appear. When, on the first of March, the newly levied army was being organized at Marlborough for operations in the west, Capt. Wads- worth was there with his company, and was sent out by the Gen eral to recall Job Kattenanit upon the occasion detailed in the last chapter. In making up the army the General made a selection of the best soldiers out of all at his disposal, and among other changes, trans ferred a part of Capt. Wadsworth s company to Capt. William Turner, who led out a company in this expedition to the west. A letter from William Torrey to the Council, dated March 7th, expresses gratitude for the assistance rendered by the Council in defence of the towns of Milton, Braintree, Weymouth and Hing- ham, and says that the Major General has " ordered the remaynder of Capt. Wadsworth and Capt. Jacobs forces to be a guard to our townes," etc. ; and that Capt. Wadsworth and his men shall be a guard to Milton, Braintree, etc. The credits in Hull s account indicate the discharge of the remainder of the company about the 7th or 8th of March, and thereafter they were employed as home-guards, and supported by their respective towns, and there is no further mention of service by Capt. Wadsworth during the next month, the operations in the western towns engrossing all the energies of the colonies and all the attention of the people. The soldiers are credited with service up to this time, and thus properly the names and credits are given in this place. Credited under Capt. Samuel Wadsworth. February 29, 1675-6. Henry Pellirigton 00 12 00 Robert Miller 01 01 04 John Rowlston 01 01 04 Stephen Fielder 01 01 04 March 24 th 1675-6. John Starr 02 08 00 Nathaniel Jewett 02 02 02 John Hunt 04 02 03 James Hadlock 03 04 00 Thomas Vos, Lieut 07 10 00 Ebenezer Williams 02 11 00 Richard Evans 02 14 10 William Scant 02 14 10 John Horsington 02 14 10 John Trescott 00 18 10 Timothy Wales 02 04 06 William Deaue 03 12 00 Mortho Hurley 02 07 02 James Stuart 03 Thomas Woods 02 April 24 th 1676. James Dalvine 02 Jacob Leonard 02 Robert Braine 02 Samuel Wadsworth, Cop* 15 James Ford 02 Peter Roberts 01 Robert Corbett 02 Henry Ledebetter 02 Robert Parker 02 Timothy Tilston 02 John Sharp 03 June 24 th 1676. George Ripley 02 Robert Munson 03 Robert Judd 01 John Hands 02 15 09 10 06 07 02 09 08 14 00 00 00 15 08 18 06 06 02 11 00 14 10 05 00 15 00 06 02 06 00 11 06 07 00 222 KING PHILIP S WAR. John Adis Ephraim Pond Jonathan Gray Abraham Hathaway Richard Evans John Redman James Badcock Thomas Beetle Thomas Mory Thomas Laurence John Baker Thomas "Williams John Poole Joseph Bosworth Robert Milton Isaac Lobdell William Hooper William Lyon 02 08 00 02 08 00 02 08 00 02 08 00 01 14 02 02 14 10 03 03 00 02 04 10 02 08 00 03 13 08 03 18 08 02 08 10 02 09 08 02 15 08 02 15 08 02 15 08 03 13 08 01 10 00 James Badcock 00 09 00 John Thare 02 14 10 July 24 th 1676. Paul Gilford 02 09 06 Joshuah Lane 05 14 00 John Alger 02 08 00 Jeremiah Hood 02 08 00 Robert Mutson 02 08 00 Samuel Gill 02 09 06 August 24 th 1676. John Angell 03 12 00 Jonathan Dunning 08 19 00 Edward Mortmore 02 08 00 Samuel Nicholson 01 07 04 Edward Samson 02 08 00 Sept. 23 d 1676. John Tuckerman 00 12 00 THE SUDBURY FIGHT. Upon the disbanding of the army under Gen. Winslow, as noted in the first of this chapter, the Indians began to gather in towards the frontier towns in large numbers, evidently elated at the apparent inability and supposed discouragement of the English. Upon April 18th they came upon Marlborough again, and burned the houses they had left in the former attack. They hovered about the town for two days, evidently seeking to draw out the soldiers from the garrisons and away into an ambush, according to their usual mode of warfare. They did not dare to engage the garrisons, however, or to come within range of the guns, but having invested the town with small parties set in ambush to guard the roads and prevent messengers or relief passing to and fro, they began to creep slowly in about Sudbury upon Thursday, April 20th. In the meantime, according to the best evidence of the best accounts from contemporary sources, Capt. Wadsworth, with a company of some fifty or more men, marched out of Boston towards Marlborough upon the same day, expecting to make up the company to one hundred with the quotas of the Middlesex towns, but did not have over seventy probably on his arrival at Marlborough, which it was the design that he should relieve with the company of one hundred men impressed l for the purpose, of whom not more than seventy appeared, and these, many of them, mere boys. They marched through Sudbury in the evening of the 20th, and without any sign of attack from the great body of Indians lying about the town and its approaches, arrived in Marl- 1 All kinds of pretexts were used to avoid the drafts at this time. For instance, an impressment of men in the militia company of Capt. Clarke of Boston, on the 18th and 19th, for this service, resulted as follows : Aaron Stephens, Philip Cain, James Burges, Thomas Wate, John Pittam and Robert Miller, hid away and could not be found except the two last, who declared they would rather " be hanged, drawne and quartered thangoe;" and only one, Thomas Smith, obeyed. Attest the Officers, Francis Hudson, Jacob Ferniside. THE FIGHT AT SUDBURY. 223 borough near midnight, where, learning that the enemy had gone towards Sudbury, Capt. Wadsworth, after a brief stop and slight reorganization of his company, leaving some of the boys that were unable to march, at the garrison, and doubtless taking some fitter men in their places, and being joined by Capt. Brocklebank, who apparently started for Boston, being relieved of his charge at the garrison by the coming of Capt. Wadsworth, with this company he marched hastily back towards Sudbury. While this company were thus marching to and from Marlbor- ough, the enemy were gathering more closely about Sudbury, as the following account, contained in the petition of the inhabitants who suffered loss in the attack, shows. The paper has been buried in the old court files for more than two hundred years, and was discovered by the writer opportunely for insertion in this chapter. This paper gives much new material in regard to the fight, and incontrovertible contemporary testimony that the fight occurred on the 21st of April. To y e Hon ble Governou r Dept Govern 1 Magistrates and Deputies of y e Gen 11 Court assembled at Boston y e 11 th October 1676 The hum ble Petition of y e poore distressed Inhabitants of Sudbury Humbly Sheweth. That Whereas yo r impoverished Petition" of Sud bury have received intelligence of a large contribution sent out of Ireland by some pious & well affected p sons for y e releife of their brethren in New England distressed by y e hostile intrusion of y e Indian Enemy, and that upon this divers distressed townes have presented a list of theire losses sustained by fireing and plundering of their Estates. Let it not seeme presumption in yo r poore petitioners to p r sent a list of what damages we sustained by y e Enemyes attempts hopeing that o r lott will be to be considered among our brethren of the tribe of Joseph being encouraged by an act of our Hon blc Gen 11 Court that those who have sustained considerable damage should make address to this p r sent Session. And is there not a reason for our releife ? Not only by reason of Our great losses but alsoe for Our Service ptormed in repelling y e Enemy ! Let y e Most High have y e high praise due unto him ; but let not y e unworthy Instruments be forgotten. "Was there with us any towne so beset since y e warre began, with twelve or fourteen hundred fighting men various Sagamores from all Parts with their men of Armes & they resolved by our ruin to revenge y 6 releife which Our Sudbury volunteers afforded to distressed Marlborough in slaying many of y e Enemy and repelling y 6 rest. The strength of our towne upon y 6 Ene my s Approaching it consisted of Eighty fighting men. True many houses were fortified & Garrison d, & tymously after y e Enemy s inva sion, and fireing some Volunteers from Watertowne, & Concord & deserving Capt : Wadsworth with his force came to Our releife, which speedy & noble service is not to be forgotten. The Enemy well know ing our Grounds, passes, avenues, and Scituations had neare sur rounded Our towne in y c Morning early (wee not knowing of it) till discovered by fireing severall disserted houses : the Enemy with greate force & fury assaulted Deacon Haines House well fortified yet badly 224 KING PHILIP S WAR. scituated, as advantageous to y e Enemys approach & dangerous to y e Repellant, yet (by y e help of God) y e garrison not onely defended y e place from betweene five or six of y e clock in y* Morning till about One in y e Afternoon but forced y e Enemy with Considerable slaughter to draw-off. Many Observables worthy of Record hapned in this assault, Viz That noe man or woman seemed to be possessed with feare ; Our Gar rison men kept not within their garrisons, but issued forth to fight y e Enemy in theire sculking approaches : Wee had but two of our townes- men slaine, & y l by indiscretion, none wounded ; The Enemy was by few beaten out of houses which they had entered and were plun dering ; And by a few hands were forced to a running flight which way they would ; The spoyle taken by them on y e East side of y e river was in greate p te recovered. Furthermore p mitte yo r humble Petition" to present a second Motion, And let it be acceptable in y e eyes of this our Grand Court Vizt. That whereas by an Act of Our late Gen 11 Court Tax rates are leavied upon Our towne amounting to 200 (as appeareth p r Warrant from Our Treasurer, which said sum was leavied by Our Invoice taken in y e yeare before Our greate damage susteyned. It is y e humble & earnest request of yo r Petition" to commiserate Our Condition in granting to us some abatement of y e said sum, for y e ensueing considerations, Viz ffirst Our towne to pay full for their Rates then taken, which in greate p te they have now lost by the Enemys invasion may seeme not to savour of pitty no not of equity. Secondly if y e Service p formed at Sudbury (by y e help of y e Almighty) whereby y e Enemy lost some say 100, some 105, some 120, and by that service much damage prevented from hap ning to other places whereby y e Country in generall was advantaged, reason requires some favorable consideration to yo r Ser vants of Sudbury. For if it be considered what it hath cost Our Country in sending out some forces some of which p tie8 have not returned with y e certaine newes of such a number slaine as with us, is it not reasonable that this service soe beneficiall should not be con sidered with some reward which may most easily be effected by issue- ing forth an Act of your grace in a sutable abatem 4 of y e said Sum leavied, with y e conferring of a Barril of Powder & sutable shott in regaurd that yo r Petitioners have spent not onely theire owne stock of either, but much of y e Towne stock. To which humble and Equitable Motions if Our hon ble Court shall benignely condescend, You will deeply oblidge yo r humble petitioners not onely to pray for y e p r sence of y e Lord to be with yo u in all yo r arduous affaires with the blessing of The Almighty upon all yo r Undertakings but shall for Ever remaine Yo r humble servants Edm: Browne Benjamin Crane John Blanford Edm: Goodnow Zacriah Maynord John Allen John Groutt Joseph Moore Henry Curtis John Haines John Parminter John Brewer Josiah Haynes Joseph Parmenter James Ross Thomas Veal Peter Noyes Richard Burk Peter King Jonathan Stanhope John Smith John Loker Sen r Edward Wright Thomas Brewes ? ACCOUNT OF SUDBURY S LOSSES. 225 Joseph Noyes John Goodenow Mathew Gibs Thomas Wedge Jabez Browne John Grout jun r Joseph Graves Tho: Walker Samuell How Henry Loker In Ans r to the Petion for Abatement in their last Ten Country Rates by reason of their losses in Estates by the Common Enemy ; Wee uppon examination finde y in their last Assm* their estates falls short 4 1 . 9 s . in then: single County Rate, doe therefore judge meet, s d Towne of Sudbury be Allowed 44, 10, out of their whole sum to them pr Rates & Referring to their request for a Barrell of Powder &c wee refer it to y e Courts determination. WILLIAM PARKER? HUGH MASON JOHN WATTE The deputyes approve of the ret. of this Committee in answer to this p te O r Hono rd Magis" 8 Consenting thereto WILLIAM TORREY, Cleric 25 October 1676 Consented to by y e Magis* Eow d RAWSON, Sect y. An Accompt of Losse sustained by several Inhabitants of y e towne of Sudbury by y e Indian Enemy y 6 21 9t Aprill 1676. Mary Bacon formerly y e Relict of Ensigne Noyes 140 00 00 Thomas Plympton 130 00 00 Deacon John Haines 130 00 00 Serj: Josiah Haines Capt: James Pendleton John Goodenow 190 00 00 060 00 00 150 00 00 William Moores 180 00 00 Edward Wright Elias Keyes John Smith 100 00 00 060 00 00 080 00 00 Samuell How 140 00 00 Mr Pelham 050 00 00 Mr Thomas Steevens 015 00 00 Corporall Henry Rice John Allen 180 00 00 060 00 00 James Rosse 070 00 00 John Grout Jun r 060 00 00 Thomas Rice Widd. Whale Henry Curtice John Brewer Jacob Moores Henry Loker Joseph ffreeman Joseph Graves Peter King Widd. Habgood Benjamin Crane Thomas Wedge John Blanford Thomas Brewes Richard Burt Thomas Reade 100 00 00 024 00 00 200 00 00 120 00 00 050 00 00 100 00 00 080 00 00 060 00 00 040 00 00 020 00 00 020 00 00 015 00 00 010 00 00 010 00 00 010 00 00 003 00 00 Totall Sum 2707 00 00 Besides y e uncovering of many houses & Barnes & some hundreds of Acres of land which lay unimproved for feare of y e Enemy to our greate loss and Damage. (Endorsed) Sudbury s Accompt of Losses (and also) Sudbury s Losses 76 This paper, never before published, gives a new phase of the fight. (Mass. Arch., vol. 30, p. 205.) The deposition of Edward Cowell Aged About years This deponautt upon oath testifieth that I being upon the Counteries 226 KING PHILIP S WAB. Searvis in Aprill last and haveing under my Conduct Eighteen men ; Upon our Returning from Mallberough to Boston ; and About three Milles From Sudbeury Wee ware surprised with divers Hundred of In dians ; Wheere of this Indian Tom was one ( ) by a grombling signe or Noyse thatt hee Mayde ; as in My Judgement was the Cause of our being ffiored upon ; at which tyme f ower of my Company was killed and one Wounded ; beside fflve horses ware disenabled they Being Shott upon Capt. Wadsworths Ingadgine with the Indian I wentt Backe and Beuryed the fower men which were killed whereof (Lt. ?) Thomas Haw- [le]y, and Hopkinsies son both of Roxbeury ; [Edmund Rice 1 ] Good man [Baker s?] son and Robert Wayle[s] of Dorchister. Sworn to before the Council 19 June 1676. EDWARD RAWSON, Secretary. OTHER CORRESPONDENCE, ETC., ABOUT THE SUDBURY FIGHT. Letter of the Massachusetts Council to the Governor of Plymouth. Hon d S r Since o r last to you It pleaseth the holy God to give still further successe to the Enemye in this Colony by killing two men the one in Hiugham, & the other in Weymouth aboute the same tyme At Marlborough also upon Tuesday and Wednesday last they burned the remainder of the Houses, so that now but three are standing that we know of but two or three garrisons ; This day we have intelligence in the general that Sudbury was this morning assaulted and many houses burnt down, particulars and the more full certainty of things is not yet come to hand whilest we are consulting what to doe, earnestly we are moved to settle some of o r faithful Indians at Meadfield or Puuqua- poag, & others at Woodcocks & we desire that yo r Colony would send such a number of yo r Indians as may be convenient to be joyned in the same service whose work shall be constantly to scout abroad between Seaconck and Meadfield & Dedham w ch is thought to be a very probable way Either to prevent the enemies coming in upon yo r Colony and ours that way, or at least to give speedy notice of their motions and dissapoynt theire mischievous designes. This motion pro ceeds from some of the cheef of our Indians William Ahaton & Capt. John who are very willing to be imployed and much persuaded, that there may be good therein. o r present thoughts are to indeavor and incourage this matter with all speed and in order hereto we have sent our Corporall Swift the bearer hereof to yo r selfe from whome you may understand things more fully & by him acquaint us with yo r view of the matter and further advise for the better perfecting of the designe & that we may also know whether you can furnish out any sufficient number of Indians from yo r parts & how soone. O r General Court of Elections is to sit upon Wednesday come seven- night, & then full order may be taken. Commending you to the God of Councell & Protection we remain E. R. S : past & signed 21 Ap r 76 Directed to the Hon ble Josia Winslow Gov r of his maj sty Colony at New Plymouth. (Mass. Arch., Vol. 68, p. 220.) 1 The name Edmund Rice is in the margin. He was probably one of those of Sudbury killed, and his name was inserted by some one in the margin of Cowell s note. Only the letter a in Baker is present. The paper is badly torn. CONCERNING SUDBURY FIGHT. 227 Petition of Daniel Warren and Joseph Peirce. To Inform the Honoured Counsel of the Service don at Sudbury by severall of the Inhabatance of Watertown as our honoured Captain Mason hath Allready informed a part thereof in the petion : but we who wear thear can rnoer largely inform this honoured Councel : that as it is said in the petion that we drove two hundred Indians- over the River ; wee followed the enimie over the river and joyned with som others and went to see if wee could relieve Captain Wadsworth upon the hill and thear we had a fight with the Indians but they beinge soe many of them and we stayed soe long that we wear allmost incornpassed by them which cased us to retreat to Captain Goodanous Garrison ; and their we stayed it being ner night till it was dark and then we went to Mr Noices Mill to see if we could find any that were escaped to that place all though they wear uoe persons dwelling there ; but thear we found : 13: or :14: of Captain Wadsworths men who wear escaped some of them wounded and brought them to Sudbury towne ; On the next day in the morning soe soon as it was light we went to looke for Concord men who wear slain in the River middow and thear we went in the colld water up to the knees where we found five and we brought them in Conus to the Bridge fut and buried them thear ; and then we joyned ourselves to Captain Hunton with as many others as we could procuer and went over the River to look for Captain Wads- worth and Captain Brattlebank and the soldiers that wear slain ; and we gathered them up and Buried them ; and then it was agreed that we should goe up to Nobscot to bring the Carts from thence into Sudbury- Towne and soe returned Horn againe ; to what is above written we whos uams are subscribed can testifi: dated the :6: of march :78: DANIEL WARRIN JOSEP PEIRCE Our request is to the much Honoured Counsel that they would be pleased to consider us in reference to our Request; their being 2 troops of hors appointed to bury the dead as we wear informed whos charg was spared and we as yet not allowed for what we did ; Your most Humb lc Servants to Command to the utmost of our poor S for our selves and in the behalf of the rest DANIEL WARRIN Mass. Arch., vol. 68, p. 224. JOSEP PEIRCE Of other contemporary accounts of the fight and its conse quences there are several from eminently reliable authorities. Treasurer John Hull wrote a letter on April 29, 1676, concern ing the sad state of affairs in the colony, giving details of suc cessive casualties, and says : " On y e 21 st valiant Captains Wads- worth and Brocklebank w th about 50 valiant souldiers were slain by y c Indians." The letters of the " Anonymous writer," published in London, which have been several times referred to above, give a very con cise account, as follows : " April 20 th Capt. Wadsworth of Dor chester, being designed with an 100 men to repair to Marlborough to strengthen the garrison, and remove the goods &c. there ; did 228 KING PHILIP S WAR. accordingly this evening march with about 70 men from Sudbury, the rest of his men not appearing. Tke Enemy who were about 1000 strong lay near his Passage, but kept themselves undiscov ered and permitted him to passe them in the night but in the morning assaulted and burned most of the Houses in Sudbury (save those that were ingarrisoned)." The writer goes on to tell that twelve volunteers from Concord came down to lend assist ance, and eleven of the number were slain, and that Capt. Wads- worth, with his tired troops that had marched all the day and night before, marched promptly back from Maryborough, being joined by Capt. Brocklebank and a few of the garrison soldiers, making a company of not more than eighty men miserably tired for want of rest and sleep. This company was drawn into am bush and encompassed by many hundred Indians, our authori ties say a thousand or more, fought them from a hill for four hours with the loss of only five men, till the Indians set fire to the woods at the windward of them, and thus forced them from their strong position, and in their retreat waylaid and destroyed all but a few of the men, who escaped to a mill, where they defended themselves till night, when rescued by Capt. Prentice s troopers, who themselves had just been rescued by Capt. Cowell and his dragoons. Rev. Increase Mather, of Boston, who published a history of this Indian war at about the same time with Mr. Hubbard, writes " April 20th, a day of humiliation was observed at Boston. The next day sad tidings came to us. For the enemy set upon Sudbury and burnt a great part of the town; and whereas Capt. Wads worth and his Lieutenant Sharp, also Capt. Brocklebank (a godly and choice spirited man) was killed at the time." Major Daniel Gookin, the commanding officer of Middlesex forces and superintendent of the " Praying Indians " in the colony, writes : Upon April 21, about midday tidings came by many messengers that a great body of the enemy not less as was judged than fifteen hundred . . . had assaulted a town called Sudbury that morn ing. . . . Indeed (thro God s favor) some small assistance had already been sent from Watertown by Capt. Hugh Mason, which was the next town to Sudbury. These with some of the inhabitants joined and with some others that came in to their help, there was vigorous resistance made and a check given to the enemy. . . . But these particulars were not known when the tidings came to Charlestown. Major Gookin gives a very full account in his history of the " Praying Indians," his object being to vindicate the Indians from the charges of treachery and inefficiency made against them by popular clamor. His account was necessarily accurate, and it agrees closely with the records. From him, and also from the Archives, we learn that a company of Indians was being organ- CONCERNING SUDBUBY FIGHT. 229 ized at this time, and the letters of the Council show that the design of this company was to fortify the fishing places upon the Merrimac, in conjunction with a company of English, and under command of Capt. Samuel Hunting, of Charlestown. This Indian company, it seems, was at Charlestown when the news of the attack upon Sudbury came, and without waiting for particulars, Major Gookin immediately despatched " a ply of horse " from Capt. Prentice s troop under Corporal Phipps, and forty Indians under Capt. Hunting, which force arrived at Sudbury that even ing, the troopers in time to rescue the remnants of Capt. Wads- worth s company from the mill, where they had taken refuge and had defended themselves against the enemy. All the above accounts are of contemporaries, and all agree in the main particulars and confirm each other in the matter of the date. Rev. Mr. Hubbard, of Ipswich, whose history of this war is most complete, and, in the main, the most reliable, agrees mostly with the others, but seems to have known less of this fight than usual, and less of the details than the others, and in the matter of the date was unquestionably wrong. From all the above authorities, the true account in brief, seems to be, that the English had no suspicion of the great numbers of the Indians that were gathering about Marlboro ugh and Sudbury, or of the vicinity of any until early in the morning of the 21st, when several deserted houses were burnt with the evident pur pose of drawing out the garrisons into an ambuscade. Then Deacon Haines s garrison-house was attacked with fury by large numbers, but was successfully defended from six o clock in the morning until one o clock, P.M., when the assault was abandoned. Twelve volunteers coming from Concord upon the alarm, to aid the garrison, were lured into the river meadow, and all slain save one. Mr. Edward Cowell, with a body of eighteen mounted men, coming from Brookfield by way of Marlborough, and by a different way from that taken by Capt. Wadsworth, became sharply engaged with an outlying party of the enemy, and lost four men killed, one wounded, and had five of his horses disabled. While the attack upon Cowell s party was still going on, Cap tain Wadsworth and his company came upon the scene, and seeing a small party of Indians, rushed forward with the usual impetuous haste, arid were caught in the usual ambuscade, for when within about a mile of Sudbury they were induced to pur sue a body of not more than one hundred, and soon found them selves drawn away about one mile into the woods, where on a sudden they were encompassed by more than five hundred, and forced to a retreating fight towards a hill where they made a brave stand for a while (one authority says four hours), and did heavy execution upon the enemy, until (Mr. Hubbard says) the night coming on and some of the company beginning to scatter 230 KING PHILIP S WAR. from the rest, their fellows were forced to follow them, and thus being encompassed in the chase by numbers, the Captains and most of the company were slain. The anonymous writer above referred to, says the Indians set fire to the woods and thus forced the disastrous retreat. Thirteen only out of the company escaped to " Noyes s mill," and there held the enemy in check. In the meantime Cowell withdrew his party from their danger ous situation, went back and buried their dead comrades, and then rode around into the town by another way in time to rescue Capt. Prentice s troopers, and afterwards, with others in com pany, the men at the mill. It was probably about noon when Capt. Wadsworth became actively engaged with the Indians, and thus withdrew their attention from both Cowell and Haines s garrison. The Watertown company arrived at about the same time, followed the Indians over the river, and made a brave fight to get to the hill, where Capt. Wadsworth was engaged in his des perate struggle, but such fearful odds were against them that they were forced to fall back to Goodnow s garrison, " it being ner night." After dark they went to the " mill," probably with the troopers and Cowell s men, and brought off the soldiers there. The troopers sent from Charlestown, with the Indian company under Capt. Hunting, must have arrived quite late in the after noon. These are the main facts, in brief, of the Sudbury fight. The next day the Watertown company, with Capt. Hunting s Indians, buried the dead. The site of the battle-field, where Capt. Wadsworth so long held the Indians at bay, is upon what is now called " Green Hill." Here, in 1730, fifty-four years after the battle, Rev. Benjamin Wadsworth, fifth son of Capt. Samuel, and at that time president of Harvard College, erected a monument to the memory of his father, and those that fell with him. It is to be regretted that President Wadsworth accepted the erroneous date given by Mr. Hubbard, which has been perpetuated upon the new monument erected in 1852. It is a regret that we are unable to know positively the numbers of English engaged. The number with Capt. Wadsworth upon the " Hill " was probably near fifty. The most definite statement 1 The investigations of Mr. Drake first exposed the error which Mr. Hubbard made in his his- tory (see NEW ENG. HIST. AND GENEALOGICAL REGISTER, vol. vii. p. 221). Gov. George S. Boutwell, who delivered the historical discourse at the dedication of the new monument, Nov. 23, 1852, and at that time assigned the date April 18, replied in 1806 (see REGISTER, vol. xx. p. 135) to Mr. Drake s article, and contended that the date given in his discourse was the true one. The Historic Genealogical Society then took the matter in hand, and appointed a committee, Gen. A. B. Underwood and Frederic Kidder, who made a thorough and exhaustive report at the society s meeting, October, 1866, which was published in the REGISTER, vol. xx. p. 341, proving beyond ques tion that the date April 21st is the true date of the fight. Contemporary Official Records, the highest evidence of all, testify in every case to this date, while the evidence for the 18th is only found in Mr. Hubbard s history and in several books of remarkable events, kept by some promi nent men of the colony, who, it is evident, not unfrequently made their entries some time after the occurrence of the events, and who, in this case, probably adopted the date from Hubbard. John Hull, for instance, whose letter-extract above, written within a few days, gives the date the 21st, in his diary of notable events puts it down as on the 18th. Major Daniel Gookin, Rev. Increase Mather, the writer of the "Present State of New England," and other authorities, agree with the Official Records in giving the 21st. Subsequent historians, until Mr. Drake, simply quote Hubbard s date. It is a great satisfaction to the present writer to add the new testimony of the petition of the inhabitants of Sudbury. SOME OF THOSE SLAIN AT SUDBURY. 231 is that of Major Gookin, who puts the number of those slain, besides the two Captains, as " about thirty-two private soldiers." Cowell had eighteen, and the Concord men were twelve. The Watertown company was not probably over forty, while the garrisons of Sudbury amounted to but eighty. Thus about two hundred men were actively engaged with, and holding in play, probably more than a thousand Indians one whole day, and finally defeated their intention of capturing the town, sending them away with fearful loss. Unfortunately we are not as yet able to find any list of the names of those killed on that day, and Mr. Hull s accounts do not show any credits referable to that service ; only here and there are we able to glean from probate and town and church records, a few names of those killed. From the Roxbury Records we find that Samuel Gardner, son of Peter Thomas Baker John Roberts Nathaniel Sever Thomas Hawley S r William Cleaves Joseph Pepper John Sharpe Thomas Hopkins Lieut Samuel Gardner were all slain att Sudbury under command of Capt. Sam 11 Wads- worth upon 21 Aprill 1676. Of the Concord men killed in the meadow near " Haynes s Garrison," but five bodies were recovered, and but seven names of the killed are preserved in the records : James Hosmer Samuel Potter John Barnes Daniel Corny Joseph Buttrick Josiah Wheeler William Heywood Three of Cowell s men, that were killed, are in the Roxbury list above. The fourth was Robert Wayles, of Dorchester. The Suffolk Probate Records give an additional name, Eliazer Hawes, of Dorchester. These, with Capts. Wadsworth and Brocklebank, make in all but twenty-one. XVII. CAPT. WILLIAM TURNER AND HIS MEN, AND THE "FALLS FIGHT." WILLIAM TURNER came from Dartmouth in South Devon shire to Dorchester, Massachusetts; admitted to the church in 1642 ; freeman May 10th, 1643. Is in list of owners of certain pasture lands there in 1646. Was chosen bailiff of the town in 1661 ; signed a petition of the inhabitants of Dor chester in 1664. He probably moved to Boston in the latter part of 1664, as he was one of the original members of the First Baptist Church gathered in Boston May 28th, 1665. The earlier members of this church, with Capt. Turner, were, Thomas Gould, elder and preacher, Thomas Osborne and his wife Mary, Edward Drinker, John George, Robert Lambert, Richard Goodall and Mary his wife, Mary Newell, John Farnham, Isaac Hull, Jacob Barney, John Russell, Jr., John Johnson, George Farlow, Seth Sweetsir, Benjamin Sweetsir and his wife. During the next few years the pressure of religious intolerance began to be exercised against the Baptists, and the General Court took action against the leaders, as " turbulent Anabaptists," disfranchised such as were freemen, and expelled Gould, Turner and Farnham from the colony, on pain of imprisonment, charging that they had " combined themselves with others in a pretended church estate, without the knowledge or approbation of the authority here established, to the great grief and offence of the godly orthodox," etc. The men, failing to leave the colony, were duly imprisoned. A petition for release, from these three, to the Court, dated Oct. 14, 1668, states that it is the twelfth week of their imprisonment. Popular feeling, the majority of the deputies, and influential friends of the colonies in England, favored the Baptists, but the magistrates were inflexible, and when a great number of influential citizens signed a popular petition in their behalf, the Council summoned many to appear and answer for " contempt of authority," in signing the petition. I think the prisoners were liberated during the winter, probably on condition of " good behavior." Capt. Turner was imprisoned again, evidently under the old sentence, and it is likely for breaking the conditions of his release. Several complaints were ANABAPTIST PERSECUTION. 233 brought up against him, the chief of which seems to have been, in this last case, that he would not present his child at church for baptism. The following letter gives some idea of the man and his condition : Letter of William Turner to the General Court. To the honored General Court now sitting at boston the humble address of Will: Turner now prisoner at boston humbly sheweth That whereas it hath pleased some of the honored maistrates to issue out A warrant for the apprehending of my body and Committing mee to prison, and there to remayne according to A sentence of A general Court the 29 th of April 1668 your poore prisoner doth therefore humbly beseech you to consider that by vertue of that sentence I have already suffered Above thirty weekes imprisonment and that A whole winter season which was a greate prejudice to my health and distraction to my poore family & which I hope this honored [Court] will consider with the weaknes of my body and the extremity of lying in prison in A cold winter whitch may be to the utter ruine of my headles family : And withal to consider my readines to serve this Country to the utter most of my ability in all civil things : The maine difference being only in faith and order of which God only can satisfie A poore soul : Thus hoping this honored Court will take it unto their serious Consideration and extend their mercy as becomes the servants of Christ I shal leave both my state and condition and honored Court to the wise disposing of the Almighty, remaining yours to serve you in all faithfulness to my power. WILL : TURNER. boston prison this 27 of 8 th mo: 1670 Mass. Archives, vol. x. p. 228. The deputies submitted this to the magistrates, who were unyielding. It is not known whether any action resulted from this letter, but at a Court held at Boston, March 2d, 1669, a petition was presented from Gould and Turner, then in prison, for release, and they were allowed " three days " to visit their families, and then to be returned to prison. Soon after this many and very earnest letters were received from prominent orthodox ministers in Eng land, deprecating these rigorous measures of the magistrates, as against the scriptures and directly prejudicial to the interests of the church in America, and to dissenting churches everywhere. The prisoners were probably released some time in the summer of 1669, and soon after Mr. Gould took up his residence perma nently at " Noddle s Island," and there the Baptists thereafter held their meetings. On November 30th, 1670, Mr. Edward Drinker, in a letter to Mr. Clarke and his church at Newport, says : " At this present our dear brother William Turner, prisoner for the Lord s cause in Boston has some good experience ; both he and brother Gould were to be taken up but only brother Turner is yet taken and has been about a month in prison." 234 KING PHILIP S WAK. Gould was not yet taken because the magistrates waited to take him in Boston, "and he came not over." He speaks bitterly of Gov. Bellingham and the magistrates, but in terms of grati tude of Messrs. Oxenbridge and Allen of the First Church in Boston, for their earnest endeavors to help the Baptists in their troubles, and says that all the deputies voted to release the pris oners, but that the magistrates " carry all before them." He says in the closing part of his letter, " Brother Turner s family is very weakly and himself too. I fear he will not trouble them long ; only this is our comfort, we hear if he dies in prison, they say they will bury him," etc. The reply to this letter was addressed " Unto the Church of Jesus Christ, meeting on Noddle s Island in New England." In December, 1671, Benjamin Sweetser, of Charlestown, writes to Newport that " brother Turner has been near to death but through mercy is revived, and so is our pastor Gould." The letter indicates that they are now at liberty, but that the persecution is being stirred up again, etc. Upon the death of Gov. Bellingham, December 7, 1672, active hostilities ceased, and the election of John Leverett as governor in May, 1673, secured them from public persecution so long as he remained in office. This digression may be justified by Capt. Turner s connection with it, and by its evidence of the relations of magistrates, deputies and people in the times just preceding the Indian war. Capt. Turner was a tailor by trade, and he plied that vocation in Boston during these years, 1664- 75. Mr. Backus, in the first volume of his history of the Baptists, page 335, has a note, of which he says : " The copy of Mr. Rus sell s Narrative that I am favored with came out of his (i.e. Mr. Callender s) family, and in it is a manuscript note in the margin, against Mr. Russell s account of Mr. Turner, which says : " In the beginning of the war, William Turner gathered a company of volunteers, but was denied a commission and discouraged, because the chief of the company were Anabaptists. Afterwards, when the war grew more general and destructive, and the country in very great dis tress, having divers towns burnt, and many men slain, then he was desired to accept a commission. He complained it was too late, his men on whom he could confide being scattered ; however, was moved to accept. I have found no official record or notice of the organization of Capt. Turner s company, but below are his own official lists, the first taken at Medfield on February 22d (the next day after the partial destruction of that town), and he reports this list of the company, " as they came out of Boston," showing February 21st as the most probable date of his marching. It is evident that his men were not all volunteers, as many were "cleared" upon their CAPT. TURNER AT NORTHAMPTON. 235 arrival at Marlborough, and some were on the list of " impressed " men. From Medfield his company marched to Marlborough, whither all the English troops were now ordered for the organization of the army about to take the field. The lists of the company are below and explain themselves, and also show that the army marched from Marlborough, February 29th, to Quabaog (Brook- field), and thence, on March 4th. The movements of the army under Major Savage are related above. Capt. Turner received at Marlborough, from the companies of Capts. Wadsworth and Reynolds, thirty-five men, giving him about eighty in his com pany. March 4th, Capt. Turner marched from Quabaog with a company of seventy men, as he left ten men at that garrison on that day. It will be remembered that on the retreat of the Narragansets in January, many of them were scattered among the Nipmucks in various places, and two large bodies of these, mingled with local tribes, were gathered, one at Meminimisset (the chief town and stronghold of the Nipmucks) and another near "Wachuset Hill." At Quabaog the army was reinforced by the Connecticut companies under Major Treat, and, after several days spent in vain search for the Indians, at last struck the trail of a large body of the enemy, but too late to prevent their escape beyond the Paquayag River, to which our cavalry pursued them. Thus the army was led to pass by undisturbed, and leave behind it a great body of the enemy at Wachuset. This was contrary to their purpose and against the urgent advice of their friendly Indian scouts, but it seemed best to their commanders (after they had been led so far from Quabaog, and with such large numbers of the Indians driven before them, who might form a junction with the western Indians and fall upon the valley plantations at once) to march forward to the towns upon the River, where they arrived on March 8th. Major Savage found that there were indications of large numbers of Indians in the vicinity, and immediately dis posed his forces for the defence of the several towns. Capt. Turner was sent across the river to Northampton for the defence of that town. The inhabitants had placed " palisadoes " about their village " for their better security," and two companies of Connecticut men under Major Treat joined Capt. Turner s com pany probably on the 13th, as the Indians were amazed to find the town full of English soldiers, when, early in the morning of March 14th, they made a vigorous and combined assault. Gathering about the town in the darkness undiscovered, and breaking through the palisades in three places, they crept in and close about the houses ; and there seem to have been no guards or night-watch, and the first intimation of the enemies presence was their furious attack upon several houses. They succeeded in setting fire to ten before the sleeping garrison could be roused ; 236 KING PHILIP S WAR. but when the Indians realized their situation, and found them selves confronted with three strong companies instead of a defenceless hamlet, they turned and rushed headlong to the breaches they had made in the palisades, panic-stricken to find themselves in a trap, and in their frantic crowding to get out were confronted with the troops, and many were shot down by ours, at the gaps, inside. Eleven of their dead were left. Five of the English known to have been killed were Robert Bartlett, Thomas Holton, and Mary Earle of Northampton, James McRenell (or Macranell) and Increas Whetstone of Capt. Turner s company. The following extract from a letter of Rev. John Russell, of Hadley, is of interest here. It is dated at Hadley, March 16th, 1675-6: Although the Lord hath granted us an intervall of quiet this winter yet since y e coming on of y* Spring the warr here is renewed with more strength and violence here than in any other part while we remaine for as we had intellegence by the captain who is returned (commonly called " Speckled Tom "), Philip intended with his whole power to come upon these Towns and taking them to make his planting place a fort this year at Deerfield so on y e 14 th instant the enemy to the number of a 1000 d as judged made a sudden and violent iruption upon Northampton brake through their works in three places & had in reason taken the whole Town had not Providence so ordered it y l Maj r Treate was come in with his men within y e night y e same evening yet they burned five houses and five barns, one within the fortification, slew five persons wounded five. There are s d to be found about a dozen of the enemy slain. Here allso above Deerfield a few miles is the great place of their fishing w ch must be expected to afford them their provisions for the yere, So that the swarme of them being here and like to continue here we must look to f eele their utmost rage except the Lord be pleased to breake their power. My desire is we may be willing to do or suffer live or dy ; remaine in or be driven out from o r habitations as the Lord o r God would have us and as may be Conducible to y e glory of his name and y e publike weale of his people, etc. etc. The Indians, meeting this unexpected repulse at Northampton, hastened away for an assault upon Hatfield, but finding it also defended by Capt. Mosely and his men, they hastily withdrew and again attempted to surprise Northampton, hoping, it is likely, that the vigilance of the English was relaxed, or a part of the troops were drawn off, but finding a ready reception awaiting, they retired completely foiled of what was expected to be an easy prey. With the exception of an attack upon Westfield a short time after, the killing of Moses Cook and Clement Bates, and the assault of a small party upon the people of Longmeadow going to Springfield to attend church, there was no further demonstration in force while the army remained. In the mean time these dis asters and their extreme want of food began to cause disaffection MARY TURNER S PETITION. 237 among the local tribes who had no immediate quarrel against the English, and to this was added the discouraging fact of the capt ure and death of Canonchet, chief of the Narragansets, and the real leader, now, of the confederated tribes. The English took advantage of this discouragement and opened negotiations look ing to a peace, while a price was offered for the head of Philip, who promptly retired out of harm s way. Capt. Turner and his company were engaged at Northampton and the neighboring towns in guarding and fortifying against the expected attack of the great body of Indians gathered in the vicinity, our troops as well as those of Connecticut being under the general command of Major Savage, for an account of whose operations and the condition of affairs at this time, see Chap. IV. of this volume, a very interesting letter of the Council to Mr. Savage, dated April 1st. In accordance with these instructions Major Savage marched home with most of the soldiers that came with him, leaving Capt. Turner in charge of the defence of these towns in Captain Poole s place, and leaving him one hundred and fifty-one men in regular service. These were mostly single men, and very largely boys and servants, or apprentices. These troops were designed for the defence of the towns, and were for garrison duty only. Hadley was made headquarters, and a garrison of fifty-one men was detailed there. Forty-five were stationed at Hatfield, nine were sent to Springfield, and forty-six at Northampton. The following petition and letter explain themselves : Petition of Mrs. Mary Turner. To the Honoured Gouvernour and Councill Now Assembled in Boston. The Humble petition of Mary Turner wife to W m Turner now in the Service of the Country Under Comand of your Honours, Humbly Sheweth, That whereas your poor petitioners husband Voluntarily & frely offered him selfe unto & now Is In your Service far from home together with his sou & servants leaving onely one servant with me which God by his Providence hath bereaved me off soe that I Am at present wholy Almost left destitute of maintenance for myselfe which calls uppon me to crave of your honours Consideration of my present Condition And order the payment to me of the whole or whatt part your honours think fitt of wages due for the time my husband son & servants have bene In the Service of the Country which shall further Ingage your poor petitioner to pray for As In duty Am Bound : the future peace & prosperity of your honours & All the people of God In this poor Country. MARY TURNER. In Ans r to the petion, It is ordered that the Committee of the Army forthwith order the petitioner be payd Seven pounds on y e Account exprest therein. Dated at Boston the 24 th of Aprill 1676 By y e Council Eow 1 RAWSON, Sec ty . Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 225. 238 KING PHILIP S WAR. Letter of Capt. William Turner. Honored Sirs. Since the army marcht hence under the Command of major general Savage and left mee here by order from your honours : I have not had any thing worth sending downe A post : And now having an opportu nity I thought meete to acquaint your honours that the souldiers here are in greate distresse for want of clothing both Linen and Woollen : So I desired the Commissaries here to send down to quabouge to see if there any supplies : So they brought from thence A few Shirts Stock ings Shoes and drawers : but not an eighth of what wee want : So that I shall beseech your honours to take some speedy Course for a supply to be sent to the Commissaries here for thei[r] [rele]eafe: here will want much as the enclosed note will show you : , forasmuch as it hath pleased your honours to commit the care of [these] townes to my charge : So I shall beseech your honours that my [wi] f e may have my wages due to mee for .to supply the wants of my family : for whome I am bound by the lawes of god and nature to make provision : And I should be glad if there might be some fitter person found for this imployment : for I much doubt my weaknes of body and my often infirmities will hardly Sufer mee to doe my duty as I ought in this imployment : And it would grieve me to be negligent in anything that might be for the good of this yeare country in this day of their dis tress : Therefore shal leave it to your honours Consideration : whether some other man may not be fitter to be imployed in this place by reason of rny weaknes of body : I have here sent you those Lists of my Company as they came from boston and afterwards from marlbo- rough as they Continued to the seventh instant : also an account from the Commissary of northamton to that day : I have also sent A List of those Left the 7 th instant under my Command in these 3 townes : most of them having beene here long before my time : Thus hoping your honours will Consider so as to send some speedy supply for the soul diers here and also order something for the supply of my family in my absence : I shall beg the Lord to be your Counsellour and guide in this time of distracktion and sore trouble : And remaine yours to serve your honours to the uttmost of my power wherein I may. WILL: TURNER. I beseech your honours deliver these lists to whome they may con- cerne : And command the souldiers to make hast backe to their quar ters : Your honours since y e close of this there is come in a young man taken from Springfield at the beginning of last month who informes that the enemy is drawing up all their forces towards these townes : and their head quarters to be at (Deere) field alias pegunkugg. Dated 25 April, 1676. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 228. Following are the lists referred to in the letter. The first shows the organization of his company until April 7th; the second list shows the disposal of his force for the defence of the towns up to April 25th. CAPT. TURNER S LISTS. 239 A List of Capt. William Turner s men as they came from Boston and taken at Medfield 1675-6. William Turner, Capt. Edward Drinker, Lieut. William Parsons, j Ezekiel Gilman, j Phellip Squire, Thomas Elliot, Thomas Barnard, James Knott, Jonathan Orris James Verin Matthias Smith W m Turner jr. Thomas Chard Samuel Gallop Ephraim Roper Henry Dawson Barthol. Whittwell Jo n Sawdy Samuel Davies Samuel Judkins Richard Cheevers Mark Wood Richard Knight Josiah Man Robert Miller Joseph Preist Elias Tyffe Jo n Cunneball Peaceful Clarke Robert Seares Richard Staines Henery Kerby Sam 11 Rawlins Joseph Gallop Edward Wright Samuel Brisantine Jo n Roberts Phellip Jessop Isaiah Toy Hoo: Steward Thomas Skinner, Clerk Roger Jones James Burges John Newton, cleared by the Councill at Medfield. Nathan Addams, sick at Medfield. Robert Briant, wounded at Dedham. A List of them Cleared at Marlborough. Henry Timberleggs, Jo n Carthew Samuell Holmes Ensigne Thomas Bendy James Parker William Wade Jo n Smith ffearnott Shaw Clement Hamblinge Joseph Dindy Will" 1 Robbins Jacob Hanson Amos .... James Travis Jo" Brackenbery Henerie Wright Jo n Jay Nathaniel Badcock This is a true List of such as came out of Boston w th me as witnesse my hand ffeb. the 22 d 1675-6. WILL: TURNER. Another list follows upon the same paper and is headed, " A List of men as they came from Marlborough ffeb: 29, 75-6." This list is identical with the one above except that Edward Crick (Creek) is Ensign in place of Henry Timberleggs (Tim- berlake) cleared as above. In the same paper also the following : Rec d these men whose names follow, from Captaine Wadsworth & fro . Capt. Reynolds. Phillip Mattoone, for whome I tooke in exchange John Thropp at Hampton. Jo n Newman made Corporall 17 March 75-6. 240 KING PHILIP S WAK. John Sympole Solomon Lowd Jo n Broughton Jo n Chappie William Bosway Jo n Rolestone Henery Beresford John Glide William Jemmison James Burnell Josiah Lane Edward Samson Jo n Walker James Hewes John Avis Joseph Lamson Jonath: Dunninge Joseph Griffin Joseph Bickner William Jaques Henery Smith William Clow William Manley Sam 11 Phesy (Vesey) William Twing George Ripley Joseph Bateman Joseph Lyon Phill: Sandy James Machrenell kild Richard Francis Diggory Sargent at Hampton March 14 th William Hartford These were left at Quabaug the 4 th of March 1675-6. Henery Pellington Tho: Brisantou Thomas Chapman David Crouter Thomas Stacy Augustine John John Gromwell Charles Duckworth James Callen Richard Sutton The Rest continued under my Command till y e 7 th of Aprill att which time 4 were left in Hadly by order of y e Councell and part of the Companie marched under the conduct off Lieut. Drinker with Maj. Savage, some by order staying with me. WILL: TURNER. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 158. A Liste off Souldjers und r the Command off Capt. Will m Turner ffro. the 7 th of Aprill 1676 Hadley Souldjers : Jo" Chamberlin William Torner Capt. William Turner Jo Luddon Serg John Throppe John Presson Souldjers sent to the Serg John Newman Jo n Bill Mill. Corp 1 Joseph Hartshorne Will" 1 Chubb Robert Scares Corp 1 Robert Sympson Moses Morgan Sam 11 Rawlins W m Armes Roger Jones John Sawdy John Strowbridge Jo n Wiseman Jonathan Dunninge Sam 11 Sybly Phillip Jessop Samuell Davies Thomas Jones Joseph Griffin John ffisher Robert Coates Josiah Man Thomas Cobbett David Hartshorne Thomas Chard Thomas Sympkins Benj. Poole John Sheapheard Richard Lever John Uppum Ephraim Roper Simon G rover Nicholas Duerell Hampton Souldjers Stephen Grover Phellep Cattlin Serg 1 Esaiah Toy John Pratt Joseph Chamblin Corp 11 John Wilde Thomas Briant Richard Snodin John Smith Triall Newbury Joseph Smith John Babson Josuah Phillips Joseph Bodman John Whiterage Benjamin Chamblin JohnChapple,Z)mraraer John Ashdowne John Rolestone William Hunt John Cooke John Longbury Samu 11 Tyly John Hix John ffoster James Barrell John Salter John Wattson William Hartforde Jeremiah Cloather FIGHT AT " TURNER S FALLS." 241 John Chaplin John Belcher John Stukely John Boyde John Walker John Roberts Martin Smith Abraham Shaw Thomas Roberts Richard Hudson Samuel Ransford Joseph fifowler Solomon Lowde William Jaques Jacob Burton William Smith Nicholas Mason Phellip Mattoon Samuel Soutch Thomas Lyon Robert Price Thomas Poore Peter Bushrodd Samuel Phesy William Willis Thomas Harris George Bewly William Howard Phellip Lewes Will" 1 Hopkins Mass. Archives, Ephraim Beeres John Arnold Richard Bever Simon Williams John ffiske, left wounded Daniel Clow by Capt. Lathroppe Edward Bishoppe Henry Raynor Hattfielde Souldjers Samuell Neale Serg Robert Bardwell Jeffery Jeffers Corp 11 Samuell Laiue Hugh Price Benjamin Barrett Hugh G-oliko Anthony Baker Jo n Largin Richard Staines Nicholas Gray Jo n Allen Richard Smith William Elliott Jo n Wilkins John Jones Thomas Staines Gilbert fforsith Benjamin Lathroppe Robert Dawes Archebold fforest Jabesh Duncan John Hughes William Batt Wallter Hixon Jabesh Musgrove Matthew Groves Anthony Ravenscraft James Molt Vol Hugh Pike Daniel Stearlin John Verin Jonathan Nichols James Verin John Downinge Joseph Moring , 68, p. 212. Sent to Springfield Serg Roger Prosser Ely Crow Will m Briggs Jeremiah Norcrosse Will m Mitchell Timothy ffroglie Onesephorus Stanly William Crane Henery Willis Richard ffrancis, Clerk. The last list shows the organization of Capt. Turner s force until THE "FALLS FIGHT," MAY 19, 1676. The disposal of Capt. Turner s forces, from April 7th up to the 25th, is indicated in the above letter. In the closing clause it will be noticed that he speaks of the news which a young man brings in just before he sends the letter away. This was prob ably John Gilbert, who with Edward Stebbins had been taken captive at Springfield about a month before and carried up the river by the Indians, where Mrs. Rowlandson, in her narrative, speaks of meeting him. Capt. Turner makes note of his infor mation to the effect that the Indians are gathering in great numbers about these towns. Mr. Hubbard, on the other hand, speaks of two " English lads," who give information of the unguarded state of the Indians, referring doubtless to Gilbert and Stebbins above mentioned, but confusing with theirs the testimony of another captive named Thomas Reed, who escaped and came in some weeks later. Some idea of the state of feeling 242 KING PHILIP S WAR. among the English inhabitants and soldiers may be gained from this letter of some of the chief actors at the front. Letter of Rev. John Russell, Capt. Turner and others to the General Court: Hadly Ap r 29, 1676 Right Worp f 11 This morning we received from Hartford these inclosed w ch we were desired to post away; and have accordingly effected with all speed. Its matter of thankfulnesse and incouragement to hear that the Lord is in any place going forth w th o r armies ; and delivering o r enemies into o r hands. We hope if o r sins hinder not it is a pledge of future & greater m rcy . It is strange to see how much spirit (more than formerly) appears in our men to be out against the enemy. A great part of the inhabitants here would our committees of militia but permitt ; would be going forth : They are daily moving for it and would fain have liberty to be going forth this night. The enemy is now come so near us, that we count we might go forth in the evening, and come upon them in the darkness of the same night. We understand from Hartford some inclination to allow some volunteers to come from them up hither, should that be I doubt not but many of o would joyne w th them. It is the generall voyce of the people here y* now is the time to distresse the enemy ; and that could we drive them from their fishing and keep out though but lesser parties against them famine would subdue them. All intelligence give us cause to hope that the Mohawks do still retain their old friendship for us and enmity against our enemies. Some proofe of it they have of late in those they slew higher up this River. Two of whom as the Indian messengers relate were of o r known Indians ; and one a Quabaog Indian. And further proof its thought they would soon give ; were the obstructions (y 1 some English have or may putt in their way) removed and the remembrance of the ancient amity and good terms between them and these colonies renewed by some letters & if it might be by some English messengers. We would not tho. out so good an end as love and zeale for the weal publique, that we should be transported beyond o r line. We crave pardon for o r reaching so farr, and with many prayers do desire to beseech the father of mercies and God of all counsell to direct you in the right way; & so praying we remaine S r Your Worships most Humble & devoted Serv ts JOHN RUSSELL JOHN LYMAN WILL: TURNER ISACK GRAVES DAVID WILTON JOHN KING SAMUEL SMITH DANIEL WARNER From a diligent study of all available authorities, from all accessible sources, supplemented by many new hints and evi dences afforded by documents preserved in the State Archives and elsewhere, I think the following is a fairly accurate account CONDITION OF THE INDIANS, MAY, 1676. 243 of the campaign of Capt. Turner in May, 1676, closing with the Falls Fight on the 18th. After the withdrawal of the army under Major Savage, the Indians seem to have relaxed much of their vigilance, watching mainly for opportunities for plunder wherever the English became careless and exposed themselves or cattle to the chance of capt ure. In the mean time the situation of the Indians was becom ing desperate. The Narragansets with their allies and many of the Wampanoags had been forced in an almost destitute condi tion upon the Nipmuck and Pocomtuck tribes for support. These unwonted numbers soon exhausted the never abundant resources of the local tribes, and when Philip s promises of a speedy victory over all the river towns with plunder of their goods were not realized, when the great chieftain Canonchet was taken and slain, and having met the repulses at Northampton and Hatfield, they were reduced almost to starvation, these river and northern Indians began to realize the folly of their too ready alliance with Philip, and put themselves into communication with the authorities at Connecticut, either with a view to real peace, or for the purpose of gaining time by a pretence of peace ful negotiations ; at any rate the English entered into the nego tiations with great zeal, and sought to turn the home tribes against Philip and the Narragansets. A price was set upon Philip s head, whereupon that chieftain betook himself with his faithful followers to safer solitudes up the river ; and now, pend ing these negotiations, the Indians gathered to the fishing places upon the river in large numbers, hoping here to supply their wants and secure a stock of provisions till they could accomplish the destruction of the towns and secure the corn and cattle of the English. Knowing that the garrisons were small, and feeling secure from attack both by numbers and distance, they grew careless in sending scouts or placing guards. They had no sus picion of the growing resolution of the English to take the offen sive, nor any information of their preparations. A large body of the Indians were gathered near the " Upper Falls " of the Con necticut, divided into several parties, one of which was located on the high ground on the right bank at the head of the Fall, another on the opposite bank, and a third at what is known now as " Smead s Island," about a mile below, and all were intent upon their fishing. Hearing, however, that the English had turned some of their cattle out into Hatfield meadows, a detach ment was sent out upon May 12th, and succeeded in " stamped ing " about seventy head of these cattle, and driving them safely into the woods. This fresh outrage was carried out with impu nity, and so enraged the English that they urged to be led out against their enemies at once, and when Reed, above mentioned, came in on May 15th, and disclosed the carelessness of the Indians, it was resolved to wait no longer, but to gather the 244 KING PHILIP S WAR. forces and strike a blow, and on that day Rev. John Russell writes a letter to the Council at Connecticut, informing them of their situation and giving general news. He speaks of their " visitation " by the epidemic distemper or malignant cold which had prevailed at Connecticut (and of which Mr. Mather wrote that he could not hear of a family in New England that wholly escaped) ; of the peaceful election at Boston on May 3d, and the return of Mrs. Rowlandsoh from captivity on that day, and letters from Philip, the " Old Queen " and other sachems, proposing terms of peace. He gives the news from Europe, the sufferings of non-conformists, and of a great naval battle between the French and Dutch. Only an extract is here given, being the closing part which relates to the Indian war. The letter is dated Hadley, May 15th. The postscript is by the military officers. . This morning about sunrise came into Hatfield one Thomas Reede a soldier who was taken captive when Deacon Good man was slain. He relates that they are now planting atDeerfield and have been so these three or four days or more, saith further that they dwell at the Falls on both sides the river, are a considerable number, yet most of them old men and women. He cannot judge that there are on both sides of the river above 60 or 70 fighting-men. They are secure and scornful, boasting of great things they have done and will do. There is Thomas Eames his daughter and child hardly used ; one or two belonging to Medfield and I think two children belonging to Lancaster. The night before last they came down to Hatfield upper meadow, and have driven away many horses and cattle to the number of fourscore and upwards as they judge. Many of these this man saw in Deerfield meadow, and found the bars put up to keep them in. This being the state of things, we think the Lord calls us to make some trial what may be done against them suddenly without further delay ; and therefore the concurring resolution of men here seems to be to go out against them tomorrow night, so as to be with them, the Lord assisting, before break of day. We need guidance and help from heaven. We humbly beg your prayers, advice and help if it may be. And therewith committing you to the guidance and blessing of the most High, Remain Your Worship s in all humble service. JOHN RUSSELL. Although this man speaks of their number as he judgeth yet they may be many more, for we perceive their number varies, and they are going and coming, so that there is no trust to his guess. WILLIAM TURNER, JOHN LYMAN, ISAAC GRAVES. Preparations had been completed for several days, and the men, gathered from the inhabitants and soldiers of the several towns and garrisons, were appointed to meet at Hatfield at the summons of the commander. Day after day passed, while they waited impatiently the company which Connecticut authorities had THE MARCH AGAINST THE INDIANS. 245 ordered to march to their assistance. These, delayed in turn by the failure of the Sachems to appear at a promised meeting, and fearing to make any hostile movement while English captives were held by the Indians, did not move, and so on May 18th Capt. Turner gathered all his available force at Hatfield, numbering up wards of one hundred and fifty rank and file. Of the garrison soldiers I think only volunteers were taken in this expedition, as it would not be safe to weaken the garrison by withdrawing a large number of the men away from the defence of the towns, which was their proper service. A comparison of the lists below will show that a very small number of eastern soldiers are among the claimants, though the list of killed has many names not rep resented there. A very large part of Capt. Turner s original com pany had marched home to Boston on April 7th, leaving him with a company of single men, boys and servants, selected from Major Savage s forces, for garrison duty. Of this expedition the offi cers were William Turner, Captain ; Samuel Holyoke, Lieut. ; Isaiah Toy (or Tay) and John Lyman, Ensigns ; Rev. Hope Ath- erton, Chaplain ; John Dickinson and Joseph Kellogg, Sergeants ; Experience Hinsdell and Benjamin Wait were guides. This company of volunteers, thus officered, and more than one half inhabitants of the several river towns, mounted upon their own horses, and armed as each might be able, or from the gar risons, took up the line of march in the evening of May 18th, from Hatfield towards the Falls, twenty miles away, through the woods. Taking their way northward through Hatfield meadows and on by the road where both Lathrop and Beers had met dis aster and death, past the ruins of Deerfield, they crossed the river at the northerly part of the meadow (a late high authority says "at the mouth of Sheldon s brook"), and thus eluded the Indian outpost stationed at a place "now called Cheapside," to guard the usual place of crossing. These Indians, it is said, over heard the crossing of the troops and turned out with torches, and examined the usual ford, but finding no traces there and hearing no further disturbance, concluded that the noise was made by moose, crossing, and so went back to their sleep. A heavy thunder shower during the night greatly aided the secrecy of the march, while it drove the Indians to their wigwams and pre vented any suspicion of an attack. This danger safely passed, the troops rode forward through Greenfield meadow, and, crossing Green river " at the mouth of Ash-swamp brook to the eastward, skirting the great swamp " (says Mr. Sheldon), they at length, about daybreak, reached the high land just south of Mount Adams, where the men dismounted, and leaving the horses under a small guard, pushed on through Fall river and up a steep hill, and halted and silently awaited daylight upon the slope (now on the farm of Mr. Stoughton, it is said), above the sleeping Indian camp. Here all was wrapped in profound sleep. It is said a 246 KING PHILIP S WAR. great feast had been celebrated the night before by the Indians, at which they had gorged themselves with fresh salmon from the river, and beef and new milk from the Hatfield cattle. Not a guard had been set, and no precaution had been made, so secure were they and unsuspicious of an English raid. And now with advancing daylight the sturdy settlers gather silently down and about their unconscious foes, to whom the first warning of danger was the crashing of a hundred muskets, dealing death in at their wigwam doors. Many were killed at the first fire, and scarcely a show of resistance was made. The savages who escaped the first fire were terrified at the thought that their old enemy was upon them, and fled towards the river, yelling " Mohawks ! Mohawks ! " and wildly threw themselves into the canoes along the banks, but many of these, overcrowding the canoes, were thrown into the river and carried over the falls to certain death ; others were shot in attempting to reach the other side ; others were chased to the shelving rocks along the banks and there shot down. It is said that Capt. Holyoke there despatched five with his own hand. Very few of the Indians escaped, and their loss was computed by contemporary writers at three hundred. One only of the English was killed, and he by mistake, by one of his comrades, and an other was wounded in this attack. The soldiers burned all the wigwams and their contents, captured the tools of the Indian blacksmiths who had set up two forges for mending arms, and threw " two great Piggs of lead (intended for making bullets) into the river." But while this was being accomplished, the several larger bodies of Indians upon the river above and below rallied, and from various quarters gathered in and about the English. A small party as decoys showed themselves crossing the river above, and succeeded in drawing a portion of our force away from the main body only to meet a large force and to re gain the command with difficulty. Capt. Turner, enfeebled as he was by his disease, collected and drew off his troops towards the horses, where the guards were about this time attacked by the enemy, who hastily withdrew at the coming of the main body. Mounting their horses, the English began the march for Hatfield. The Indians in increasing numbers gathered upon flank and rear. Capt. Turner led the van, though so weak from long sickness as scarcely able to manage his horse. The intrepid Capt. Holyoke commanded the rear guard, but in effect conducted the retreat. The Indians advanced upon the left and rear, and several sharp skirmishes ensued while they tried to separate the rear guard from the main. Once Capt. Holyoke s horse was shot down, and he narrowly escaped capture by the Indians, who rushed forward to seize him, by shooting down the foremost with his pistols, till his men came to his aid. On the left of the line of march, nearly all the way to Green river, was a swamp in which the Indians found safe cover. A rumor was started (by an escaped captive, SLAIN AT THE " FALLS FIGHT." 247 it is said) that Philip with a thousand warriors was at hand, and a panic ensued. The guides differed as to the course, and some following one and some another, disorder prevailed, and the com mand was broken up. Two parties leaving the main body were cut off and lost. Capt. Turner pushed forward with the advance as far as Green river, and was shot by the Indians while crossing the stream, near the mouth of the brook upon which afterwards stood " Nash s " Mill. His body was found near the place by a scouting party a short time afterwards. The whole command now devolved upon Capt. Holyoke, who led his shattered force, fighting every rod of the way, to the south side of Deerfield meadow to the place known as the " Bars." That the retreat did not end in a general massacre is doubtless due to the skill and bravery of Capt. Holyoke in keeping the main body together, and in protecting flank and rear while push ing forward to avoid the chance of ambuscades. As it was, they found, on arriving at Hatfield, that some forty-five or more of their men were missing. Rev. Mr. Russell s letter of May 22d gives some account of the losses, and says that six of the missing have come in, reducing the number of the lost to thirty-eight or thirty-nine. Of the Indian losses he gives the report of Sergt. Bardwell that he counted upwards of one hundred in and about the wigwams and along the river banks, and the testimony of William Drew and others that they counted some " six-score and ten." " Hence we cannot but judge that there were above 200 of them slain." Of the slain of our soldiers the following list is taken from the best available authorities. The battle and the leader are perpetu ated in the name " Turner s Falls," applied to the scene of the fight. Capt. William Turner, Boston. Serg John Dickinson, Hatfield. William Allis, " John Coif ax, " Samuel Gillet, " Experience Hiusdell, Hadley. John Church, " Samuel Crow, " Thomas Elgar, " Isaac Harrison, " John Taylor, Hadley. Edward Hodgman, Springfield. George Hewes, " Joseph Pike, " James Bennet, Northampton. John Miller, " John Walker, " Jabez Duncan, Worcester. John Ashdowne, Weymouth. The residence of the last thirteen Nathaniel Sutliff, Deerfield. John Hadlock, Roxbury. Samuel Veze, Braintree. Josiah Mann, Boston. John Whitteridge, Salem. George Buckley. Jacob Burton. John Foster. Joseph Fowler. Peter Germ. John Langbury. Thomas Lyoii. Samuel Rainsford. Thomas Roberts. George Ruggles. John Symms. John Watson. William Howard. not known. 248 KING PHILIP S WAR. The two servants mentioned in the following petition were doubtless apprentices whose service was needed by widow Turner about the Captain s business, now left to her management. Buckman (or Bucknam) may have been of Charlestown, son of William. His name appears in a later ledger of John Hull, and John Sawdy was probably son of John of Boston. To the Honourable Gouvener And Councill Now Assembled In Boston. The Humble petition of Mary Turner Humbly showeth that whereas your poor petitioner hath lost her husband in the Services of the Country Ingaging Against the Barbarious & Cruell Heathen the Enemy thereof And having now still two servants named John Sawdy And Samuell Buckman who went out with him in the Country s service att haclley my widowhood estate & Condition for want of Convenient supply of maintenances makes me Bold to supli- cate your honours for An order for theire Releas & discharge from the place to which att present they do belong & that your honours will so far Consider my Condition as to order me pay for whatt Is In your honours Judgment my Just : & Consider me In Respect of the Loss of my Husband as your honours shall see mette which shall further Ingage your poor petitioner to pray for your hon" & this Countries peace & prosperity. [Endorsed] Mrs. Turners petition, 26 June 1676. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 21. April 24 th 1676 John Cunneball June 24 th 1676 John Coniball John Broughton Samuel Judkins Isaiah Toy William Parsons ) Joseph Gallop } William Jameson James Knott Matthias Smith William Clough Edward Wright Joseph Lamson Joseph Bicknell William Turner Joseph Priest Henry Dason Thomas Barnard Philip Squire Ephraim Roper Joseph Bateman der Capt. William Turner : Edward Drinker 05 11 06 01 04 00 Samuel Holmes 00 08 06 Samuel Davis 01 17 08 02 04 06 Richard Cheever 03 12 10 02 10 06 Robert Seares 03 06 00 02 04 06 02 04 06 William Turner, Capt. Ezekiel Gilman 07 00 00 03 08 00 05 11 00 02 10 06 Hoo Steward Robert Bryan Elias Stiff 02 04 06 02 04 06 02 04 06 02 12 00 02 02 10 Henry Beresford Jonathan Orris 02 10 06 02 04 06 02 08 10 Edward Creek ~\ 02 14 00 01 16 00 Henry Finch > John Avis ) 10 02 00 01 16 00 03 18 00 Henry Kerby Thomas Elliott 02 04 06 02 12 00 02 04 06 02 04 06 Henry Wright Bartholomew Whitwell 00 06 00 02 04 06 02 12 00 Thomas Skinner 03 04 09 01 08 00 04 10 10 Richard Knight Percivall Clark 02 04 06 02 04 06 01 16 10 Mark Wood 02 04 06 SOLDIERS IN THE " FALLS FIGHT." 249 July 24 1676. Thomas Brissenden 04 16 00 John Newman 05 03 09 John Simple 02 04 06 August 24 th 1676. William Turner, Capt. 06 06 06 Samuel Gallop 02 03 08 Philip Jessop 03 13 08 William Turner 05 08 06 John Sherly 05 14 00 Edward Samson 01 17 08 Josiah Mann 03 13 08 John Smith 00 10 02 Sept. 23 d 1676. Thomas Bond 00 06 00 Thomas Lyon 10 04 00 Roger Jones 08 08 00 The credits above mostly represent those soldiers who served under Capt. Turner from February 20th until April 7th, and the sum X02 04s. 06d. covers the time until their arrival home, about seven weeks and five days from their marching away. After April 7th, those of his soldiers who remained in the West received credit at the several garrisons at which they were located, and their names will appear in that connection ; and this is the reason that so few who were in the "Falls Fight" are credited as serving under Capt. Turner. After his death the officers of the garrison signed their vouchers. The following list is the most important of all these that are preserved pertaining to the soldiers of Capt. Turner, as it con tains the names of all the soldiers of whom the committee could find any trace. The grant was made of a township of land, as near as might be to the scene of the " Falls Fight," to all officers and soldiers who were engaged therein. This alphabetical list was evidently kept in the hands of the committee, and new names are added in different hands through several years. A few fragmentary papers are preserved in the archives in connec tion with this list, that show the methods of proving and identi fying claims. A certificate from John Bradshaw, still alive in February, 1735, declares that himself, Mr. Isaiah Tay, late of Boston, deceased, who was a lieutenant under Capt. Turner, and Nathaniel Pierce, of Woburn, were in the fight. John Dunkin, of Worcester, certifies, April 1st, 1735, that his uncle Jabez Dunkin was killed in the fight, and applies as his proper heir. John Chase, of Newbury, certifies that he was in the expedition with Capt. Turner, and helped to bury him, and that Samuel Coleby, late of Almsbury, deceased, was with him. Some other papers of like tenor are preserved, and several frag ments of evidence from town and church records, showing that the committee demanded proofs before granting the claims. The residences of the soldiers were given according to the best knowl edge of the committee, very often at loss for any information after the lapse of sixty years. Many of the soldiers, after the war, had removed to interior towns, and their descendants to dif ferent States, and sometimes the present residence of the claimant would be given as the supposed home of the soldier ancestor. Very many of the soldiers from the East were single men, boys 250 KING PHILIP S WAK. and apprentices, and when these were killed their names were soon lost, unless some record was made. At Northampton a record of the death of thirteen of the soldiers, who had been in garrison there, together with that of Capt. Turner, is found upon the town books under date of May 19, 1676, with the comment, "all slain by Indians." The committee finding this record, and not knowing otherwise, assigned Northampton, or " North," as their residence. It will be seen that one hundred and thirty-five names appear, while up to 1741 only ninety-nine claimants had been admitted. This may be explained by the fact that so many of those engaged in the affair were strangers in the colony, or mere boys, who left no legal claimants in this country. In other cases it would be difficult to prove relationship such as would entitle to a claim, especially when the soldier ancestor had removed to a distant part of the country. A List of y e Soldiers y 4 were in y e Fall Fight under Capt. W m Turner, approved off by y e Committee of y e Gen. Court. (Dated June, 1736.) Allexander, Nath 11 , N. Hamp 1 . Alvard, Thorn 9 , Hadfield. Atherton, Hope, Hatfield. Ashdown, John. Arms, William, Hadley. Baker, Timothy, North Hampt. Bedortha, Sam 11 , Springfield. Bennett, James, South Hampt. Barber, John, Springfield. Burnap, John. Bradshaw, John, Medford. Burnitt, John, Windham. Bushrod, Peter, Northampton. Boultwood, Sam 11 , Hadley. Bardwell, Robt , Hatfield. Ball, Sam 11 , Springfield. Burton, Jacob, North. Beers, Richard, of Watertown, eld est son of Elnathan Beers. Belding, Sam 11 . Clap, Preserved, Northampton. Fowler, Joseph, North. Flanders, John. Foot, Nath 11 , Hatfield. Gleason, Isaac, Spring. Grover, Simon, Boston. Gerrin, 1 Peter, North. Griffin, Joseph, Roxbury. Hitchcock, John, Springfield. Hitchcock, Luke, Springfield. Hadlock, John. Ho it, David, Hadley. Hawks, John, Hadley. Hawks, Eleaz r , Hadley. Howard, William, North. Harrison, Isaac, Hadley. Hughs, George, Spring. Hinsdell, Experience, Hadley. Hodgman, Edward, Spring. Hunt, Sam 11 , Billerica. Harwood, James. Ingram, John, Hadley. Jones, Sam 1 . Jones, Robertt. Jilett, Sam 11 , Hatfield. James, Abell, North. King, John, North. Keett, Franc. Northamton. Kellogg, Joseph, Hadley. Lee, John, Westfield. Lyman, John, North. Leeds, Joseph, Dorchester. Leonard, Josiah, Spring. Langbury, John, North. Lyon, Thomas, North. Miller, John, North. Merry, Cornelius, North. Morgan, Isaac, Springfield. Morgan, Jonathan, Spring. Miller, Thomas, Spring. 1 In the Northampton records Peter Jerrin. In Hull s accounts two persons appear in different places, Peter Jennings and Peter Gennings. This may be one of the two. LIST OF TURNER S MEN. 251 Mun, James, Alive : Colchester. Mun, John, Deerfield. Monteague, Peter, Hadley. Mattoon, Phillip, Hadley. Man, Josiah. Nims, Godfrey, North. Newbury, Tryall, Boston. Old, Robert, Spring. Chapin, Japhett, Springfield. Crow, Sam 11 , Hadley. Crowfott, Joseph, Springfield. Clark, William, Northampton. Church, John, Hadley. Coleman, Noah, Hadley. Chamberlain, Benja., Hadley. Chamberlain, Joseph. Colfax, John, Hatfield. Cunuaball, John, Boston. Chase, John, Almsbury. Coleby, John, Almsbury. Dickenson, John, Hadley. Drew, W m , Hadley. Dickenson, Nehemiah, Hadley. Dunkin, Jabez, Worcester. Edwards, Benj a , North. Elgar, Thomas, Hadley. Fuller, Joseph, Newtown. Feild, Samuel, Hatfield. Forster, John, North. Pumroy, Medad, North. Price, Robert, North. Pike, Joseph, Spring. Pumroy, Caleb, North. Preston, John, Hadley. Pratt, John, Maiden. Pressey, John, Almsbury. Pearse, Nath 1 , Woburn. Rogers, Henery, Spring. Endorsement of the committee : By y e best Acco" we can come at y c foregoing is a true list of y e Sol diers y* were in y e falls fight w th y e Indians under Capt. Turner & for ought appears to us at present y er Descendants according to y e acts of y e General Court are to be admitted to share in y c Grant of y e town ship above Deerfield granted them. The following list of claimants was admitted June 23d, 1736, and the name of John Scott, of Elbows, was added, doubtless before the report was accepted, and the figures also were changed. Thos. Wells, of Deerfield, was then appointed agent for the pro 1 This name is in the margin, and was added after the list waa made out. Roberts, Thomas, North. Ransford, Sam 11 , North. Ruggles, George, North. Read, Thomas, Westford. Roper, Ephr 11 . Siky, Nath 11 . Suttleife, Nath 11 , Hadley. Stebins, Sam 11 , Springfield. Stebins, Benoni, North. Stebins, Thomas, Springfield. Smeade, W m , Northampton. Smith, John, Hadley. Stephenson, James, Springf. Seldin, Joseph, Hadley. Scott, W m , Hatfield. Salter, John, Charlestown. Simonds, John. (Smith, Rich*.) 1 Turner, Capt. W m , now Swan y. Tay, Isaiah, IA, Boston. Thomas, Benj a , Spring. Taylor, John. Taylor, Jonathan, Spriug d . Tyley, Sam 11 . Veazy, Sam 11 , Brantrey. Wright, James, North. Webb, John, North. Webb, Richard, North. Waite, Benjamin, Hatfield. Witteridge, John, North. Walker, John, North. Webber, Eleaz r . Wattson, John. Wells, Thomas, Hadley. White, Henry, Hadley. Warriner, Joseph, Hadley. Wells, Jonathan, Hadley. Worthington, W m . 252 KING PHILIP S WAR. prietors. Lots were drawn to the claimants according to the above list, and the settlement progressed. A previous grant to Mr. Fairweather of five hundred acres, together with much moun tainous and waste land, reduced the original grant of six miles square to a tract of far less value, so that in 1741, when new claimants began to appear, the proprietors petitioned for and obtained another tract lying contiguous, a " gore " not yet covered by any previous grant. Two new claimants, Samuel Coleby, eldest son of Samuel Coleby, of Almsbury, and Tryall Newbury, of Maiden, were admitted to first choice of lots on the new tract, by act of the Court August 1, 1741. Perhaps later claimants were admitted. The grant embraced the present town of Ber- nardston (at first called " Falltown " ), Colraine, Leyden, etc. The names of descendants stand first in the list. A list of Soldiers and Descndts of such as are Deceased that were in the fight called the falls fight above Dearfield who are intituled to the township granted by the Generall Court, as follows : Joseph Atherton, Deerfield, only son of Hope Atherton. Nath 1 Allexander, Northampton, Nath Alexander. Thomas Alward, Middleton, eldest son of Thorn: Alvard. John Arms, Dearfield, son William Arms. John Baker, Northampton, son of Timothy Baker. Samuel Bedortha, Springfield, son of Sam: Bedortha. John Field, Dearfield, Dsc nd James Bennett. John Barbur, Springfield, son John Barbur. John Bradshaw, Medford, John Bradshaw. Isaac Burnap, Windham, son John Burnap. Sam 1 Clesson, Northampton, Desc 1 Peter Bushrod. Sam 1 Boltwood, Hadley, son Sam: Boltwood. Sam 1 Bardwell, Dearf d , son Rob Bardwell. John Hitchcock, Springfield, Descend. Samll: Ball. Stephen Beldin, No th ampton, son Stephen Beldin. Richard Beers, Watertown, son Elnathan Beers. Samuell Beldin, Hatf d , Sam 11 Beldin. Preserved Clap, N th ampton, son Preserved Clap. Thomas Chapin, Springfield, son Japheth Chapin. Samuell Crow, Hadley, son Samuell Crow. Joseph Crowfoot, Wethersfield, Descend Joseph Crowfoot. William Clark, Lebanon, son William Clark. Noah Cook, Hadley, Descend 1 Noah Coleman. Benj a Chamberlain, Colchester, Benj a Chamberlain. Nath 11 Chamberlain, Descend 4 Joseph Chamberlain. Sam 11 Cunniball, Boston, son John Cunniball. John Chase, Newbury, John Chase. William Dickeson, Hadley, son Nehemiah Dickeson. Samuell Jellet, Hatfield, Descen 1 John Dickeson. Benj a Edwards, N. Hampton, son Benj a Edwards. Joseph Fuller, Newtown, Joseph Fuller. Sam u Feild, Dearfeild, son Sam 11 Feild. GRANTEES AND DESCENDANTS. 253 Nath 11 Foot, Colchester, son Nath: Foot. John Flanders, Kingston, son John Flanders. Isaac G-leeson, endfield, son Isaac Gleasou. Richard Church, Hadley, Desc Isaac Harrison. Simon Grover, Maiden, son of Simon Grover. Samuell Griffen, Roxbury, son Joseph Griffen. John Hitchcock, Spriugf d , son John Hitchcock. Luke Hitchcock, Springf d , son Luke Hitchcock. Jonathan Hoit, Dearf d , son David Hoit. Jonathan Scott, Waterbury, Descend John Hawks. Eleaser Hawks, Dearf d , son Eleaser Hawks. James Harwood, Concord, son James Harwood. John Doud, Middleton, Descend 4 Experience Hinsdell. Samuell Hunt, Tewsbury, Samuell Hunt. William James, Lebanon, son Abell James. John ingram, Hadley, son John ingram. Sam 11 Jellet, Hatfield, son Sam 11 Jellett. William Jones, Almsbury, sou Robert Jones. Medad King, N hampton, son John King. Francis Keet, N hampton, son Francis Keet. Martin Kellog, Suffleld, son Joseph Kellog. John Lee, Westfield, sou John Lee. John Lyman, N hampton, son John Lyman. Joseph Leeds, Dorchester, son Joseph Leeds. Josiah Leonard, Springf d , son Josiah Leonard. John Merry, Long Island, son Cornelius Merry. Stephen Noble, formerly of eudfield, Des nt Isaac Morgan. Jonathan Morgan, Springf d , son Jonathan Morgan. Thomas Miller, Springf d , son Thomas Miller. James Mun, Colchester, James Mun. Benj a Mun, Dearfield, son John Mun. John Mattoon, Wallingford, son Phillip Mattoon. John Nims, Dearf d , son Godfrey Nims. Ebenezer Pumroy, N hamptou, son Medad Pumroy. Sam 11 Pumroy, N. H., son Caleb Pumroy. Samuell Price, Glassenbury, son Robert Price. Sam 11 Preston, Hadley, Des 1 John Preston. Thomas Pratt, Maiden, son John Pratt. John Pressey, Alrnsbury, son John Pressey. Henry Rogers, Spriugf d , son Henry Rogers. John Reed, Westford, son Thomas Reed. Nath 11 Sikes, Springf d , son Nath 11 Sikes. Nath 11 Sutliff, Durham, son Nath: Sutliff, Sam 11 Stebbins, Springf d , son of Samuel Stebbins. Luke Noble, Westfield, Des of Thomas Stebbins. Ebenezer Smeed, Dearfield, son of William Smeed. Joseph Smith, Hatfield, son of John Smith. James Stephenson, Springf d , son of James Stephenson. Thomas Selden, Haddam, son of Joseph Selden. Josiah Scott, Hatfield, son of William Scott. John Salter, Charlestown, son of John Salter. William Turner, Swansey, Grandson of Capt. Turner. 254 KING PHILIP S WAR. Benjamen Thomas, Stafford, son of Benjamen Thomas. Joseph Winchall, jr. Suffleld, Descend 1 Jonathan Taller. Samuell Tyley, Boston, son of Samuell Tyley. Preserved Wright, N. H. son of James Wright. Cornelius Webb, Springf d , son of John Webb. Jonathan Webb, Stamford, son of Richard Webb. John Wait, Hatfield, son of Benjamen Wait. Eleaser Webber, Westfield, son of Eleaser Webber. Thomas Wells, Dearfield, son of Thomas Wells. Ebenezer Wariner, Endfield, son of Joseph Warmer. Jonathan Wells, Dearfield, Jonathan Wells. William Worthington, Colchester, son of Nicho Worthington. John Scott, elbows, Grandson John Scott. 1 The Committee appointed to inlist the officers and Souldiers 96 in in the fight called the falls fight under the Command of number Capt. William Turner then Slain and the Descend" of such as 97 in are Deceased and that are intituled to the grant of this great all and generall Court made them of a towneship, have attended many times that service & returne the list above & afore said which contains the persons names claiming & from whome and which the Committee have accordingly allowed all which is Submitted. W M DUDLEY Boston June 1736. EZE. LEWIS JOHN STODDARD In Council June 23, 1736 JOSEPH DWIGHT Read and ordered that this Report be accepted. JOHN WAINWRIGHT. Sent down for concurrence. SIMON FROST, Dep y Secretary. Archives, vol. 114, p. 610. Quite a number of the soldiers, as will be noticed, were alive, and presented their claims in their own persons ; for instance, Nathaniel Alexander, John Bradshaw, Samuel Beldin, John Chase, Joseph Fuller, Samuel Hunt, James Mun, Jonathan Wells, and very likely many others. CAPT. WILLIAM TURNER S FAMILY. Notwithstanding the notable career of Capt. Turner, all the results of efforts to trace his posterity so far amount to a few accidental clues and inferences, and the following attempt to arrange these is little more than a summary of probabilities. William Turner was of Dorchester from 1642-1664, but no record of marriage or birth of children is yet found. On Boston Town Records, under date of July 31st, 1665, " Sargt Will: Turner was ordered to p vide for himselfe and family in some other place, having carried it ofencively here." He was again admonished August 28th, and, not complying, was, on Sept. 25th, ordered to be presented to the next county court. Of his further perse- CAPT. TURNER S FAMILY. 255 cution, account is given above. On Boston Town Records is found, " Prudence, dau. of William and Frances Turner born October 12th 1665." In Suffolk Registry of Deeds, vol. x. p. 318, William Turner and Mary his wife, relict and executrix to the Will of John Pratt, her former husband, dec d ( Vide His torical and Genealogical Register, vol. vii. p. 36), convey to Jacob Hewins a dwelling-house and three-and-a-half acres of land, etc. This lot was bounded on the south very nearly by what is now Howard Avenue, and lay not very far to the west from the corner of what are now Dudley Street and Howard Avenue in Ward 20. The deed was made April 1st, 1671, and shows that the wife Frances was dead and the second wife Mary, widow of John Pratt, had been married. Their home was doubtless in Boston after 1665. No record is found of the death of this second wife, but in his will above mentioned, dated February 16th, 1675-6, he mentions Mary his wife, formerly wife of Key Alsop. Now Key Alsop died April 30th, 1672, and she married Capt. Turner prob ably in 1673-4 as his third wife. Frances, the first, was probably the mother of all his children, but of the place and date of their births no record is found save of Prudence, above men tioned, and William, of his company, who is identified as his son, by reference to him in the petition of Mary Turner above given. His will, however, proves that he had sons and daughters living iu 1676, and it would seem that the son William was under twenty-one years, as his mother-in-law petitions for his wages as appears above. Thomas and William Turner were serving in the garrison at Marlborough in the summer and fall of 1675, and in the trouble which Lieut. John Ruddock had with the Marlborough townspeople, Thomas was first on the list of soldiers, who gave evidence in favor of the Lieutenant, and then disappears from view, but reappears in 1678 at Bridgewater, where, with Joseph Howard, he is appointed surveyor. In 1680 he is at Scituate, where he settles and has children, of whom the second son, William, born Jan. 13th, 1683-4, furnishes the clue which con nects this family with Capt. William of the Falls Fight ; for this William, son of Thomas, was the same who in 1736 drew Capt. Turner s right in the grant above mentioned, and is styled his " grandson ; " he died in Newport, R.L, " Oct. 4th, 1759, in the 77th year of his age," and the correspondence of birth, grant and death, affords the clue. Dr. T. Larkin Turner, of Boston, has worked out this theory, and following it up I find many other points. From Bristol County Registry I find that in 1710 Josiah Turner, of Swansey, sold to his "brother Thomas Turner, of Scituate, shipwright," a farm in Swansey. Both were inhabitants of Swansey in 1711. The Province law enacted that the eldest male heir of a soldier-grantee should have the choice of taking the grant and paying off the other heirs their proportional part of X10, which was the established valuation of a share. 256 KING PHILIP S WAR. The various clues and inferences above seem to point to the following as a fair approximation to the family of Capt. WILLIAM TURNER and wife FRANCES. PATIENCE, 2 bapt. in Dorchester, Nov. 10, 1644. THOMAS, 2 soldier at Marlborough, 1675 ; at Bridgewater, Scituate and Swansey, a shipwright, 1678-1715; at latter date he purchased land in Free town of Constant Church. WILLIAM, 2 the soldier in the army with his father as noted above, settled in Boston. JOSHUA, 2 joined 1st Baptist Church in Boston, 1669. JosiAH, 2 of Swansey, in 1706, with wife Hannah and children. ELIZABETH, 2 joined Bap tist Church 1676; perhaps m. Alexander Duiikan, July 6, 1698, " married by Mr. Miles." PRUDENCE 2 b. in Boston, Oct. 12, 1665. JOSEPH, 2 who (perhaps) married Sarah Wyman, dau. of Thomas, a " Tailor," 1704. Second Generation. Line of THOMAS, 2 of Scituate, etc. THOMAS, 3 b. Sept. 18, 1682. Probably settled in Rochester, Mass., and had family there ; perhaps died before 1736, or waived his right or sold it to William his brother, of Swansey. WILLIAM, 3 m. Patience Hale, of Swansey, in 1711. Settled in Swansey, and was quite a large land-owner and a ship-builder. He succeeded to the Indian- War claim of his grandfather, as above- said. He was one of the non-resident proprietors who agreed to pay 23 each to carry forward the settlement of the Township. He was of Swansey as late as 1748, but later removed to New port, R.I., where he died Oct. 4, 1759, in his 77th year. His chil dren, born in Swansey, were: William, b. April 27, 1713, became a physician in New Jersey ; and his other children, born between 1714 and 1734, were : Lillis, Nathaniel, Patience, Caleb, and Hale. ii. REBECCA. 3 iv. JOSHUA. 3 v. CALEB. 3 vi. DAVID. 3 vii. JOSEPH. 3 viii. BENJAMIN. 3 The descendants of these six are scattered through various parts of New England; and Dr. T. L. Turner, of Boston, has in preparation a genealogy of this whole branch of the Turner family, and has furnished much of the material above, for my use in this article. Second Generation. Line of WILLIAM. Z WILLIAM 2 Turner, son of Capt. William, a soldier at Marlborough Gar rison in the summer and fall of 1675, in the Army with his father from February 21, 1675-6, until the Captain s death, but was not in the " Falls Fight." He served sometime after that, as the accounts of service indicate. Married before 1679, and settled in Boston. Is in a list of handy-craftsmen later. In 1691 was among those who returned from the West Indies, bringing an account of the great earthquake there; 1695, chosen constable in Boston; 1698, tythiugmau; 1699, clerk of the market; 1701, licensed to sell wine, etc. ; 1708, his wife Hannah is licensed to sell wine. His first wife was Ruth, by whom he had Joshua, b. Sept. 28, 1679, and again Joshua, b. Aug. 20, 1687. He married CAPT. TURNER S FAMILY. 257 Hannah Jacklin, Aug. 28, 1689, and had Mercy, b. Feb. 19, 1691 ; Hannah, b. Feb. 25, 1693; William, b. Dec. 12, 1699. Mary, b. March 29, 1696, and Mary, b. Feb. 28, 1697, are assigned to parents " William and Mary," but probably is a mistake and should be William and Hannah. JOSIAH 2 Turner, son of Capt. William, settled in Swansey with wife Hannah, and had there John, 3 b. Nov. 11, 1706; Nathaniel, 3 b. March 19, 1709-10. Thanks are due to Dr. T. Larkin Turner and Messrs. W. B. Trask, J. W. D. Hall, H. O. Wood, and G. H. Tilton, for help ful assistance in the above account of Capt. Turner s family, the results of which do not at all represent the amount of work done. XVIII. CAPT. JONATHAN POOLE, CAPT. THOMAS BRATTLE, AND THEIR COMPANIES. JONATHAN POOLE, of Reading, was the son of John and Margaret, and was born (probably at Cambridge) in 1634. His father was one of the first settlers of Reading, a large land-owner, and doubtless was the wealthiest of the settlers. The family homestead was on the present site of the " Wakefield Rattan Works," and to this and other large tracts of land Jona than succeeded upon the death of his father in 1667. His wife s name was Judith, and their children, born in Read ing, were Sarah, born 1656, married, 1673, Thomas Bancroft ; Judith, born 1658 ; Mary, born 1660, died 1661 ; Mary, 2d, born 1662, married, 1682, James Nichols; John, born 1665 ; Jonathan, born 1667, married Bridget Fitch, 1691-2 ; Thomas, born 1673 ; William, bom 1677 ; Elizabeth, born 1678. Capt. Poole died in 1678 ; aged 44 years. His widow, Judith, married, 1681, Capt. Wm. Hasey, and third, Lieut. Robt. Gould, of Hull, and died, in Hull, 1704. In October, 1671, he was appointed Quartermaster, and in May, 1674, Cornet of the " Three County Troop," and still held that office when the war broke out in 1675. In the summer he was in service under Lieut Hasey, serving as Cornet, and will appear in Hasey s list. In the campaign under Major Appleton, in the fall of 1675, we find him in important positions. Sept. 30th he was in command of the garrison at Quabaog. He proba bly marched his troops, about October 10th, to Hadley, whence he was assigned by Major Appleton to the defence of Hatfield. On October 19th, when that town was attacked, Capt. Poole was in command of a company, and gallantly and successfully de fended the north side of the town, account of which is given above. In this defence, John Pocock, of Capt. Poole s company, was killed. When Major Appleton had the command of this army of the west suddenly thrust upon him by the Council, he ap pointed Cornet Poole to a captaincy, and sent word to the Coun cil of his action, but the Council in reply rebuked this assumption of authority on his part, instructing him that it is his place to recommend a deserving officer, but the Council s place to pro- CAPT. POOLE S SOLDIERS. 259 mote. Upon the necessity to consult the Council more fully than by letters, he sends Capt. Poole personally in charge of his messengers, who evidently made so good an impression upon the worthy magistrates that they recognized the wisdom of Major Appleton, and upon his withdrawal of the main army for the campaign at Narraganset, Captain Poole was placed in command of the garrison forces in the Connecticut towns, and remained at his post until, at the earnest solicitation of his friends and family, he was relieved by the appointment of Capt. Turner, April 7th, 1676. Of his service during the winter some idea may be gained from the following extract from a letter of Rev. John Russell to the Council : Capt. Poole who hath been last here for y c governm of y e souldiers & as president of y c Council of warr here doth earnestly intreate for a liberty to repaire to his own very much suffering family at least for a while, We may not be so selvish as to be unsensible to kindnesse to us in his stay here or losse to him thereby so as to hinder y e promoting of any rationall request consisting w th o r publike safety : We are thankfull for what blessing God hath made him to us ; desirous to retaine him while not to much to his p r judice. He signifies to us y there is now here in the army a man of y c same Town viz. Redding by Name Mr. John Brown whom he judgeth very fitt to oversee the souldiers, etc., etc. Hadley March 16 th 1675-6. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 163. October 19 th 1675 Benjamin Hurd Thomas Lasel November 20 th 1675 Simon Burr Joseph Hartshorne Jacob Hurd William Arnold James Pike Phineas Upham, Lieut. Abraham Staples Samuel Read December 20 th 1675 Benjamin Chamberlain Walter Hickson John Pemberton January 25 th 1675 John Pocock Joshuah Fuller Joseph Chamberlaine February 29, 1675 George Eborne March 24, 1675. John Laine edit 0(1 under Capt. Poole. 15 Richard Silvester or> 00 00 01 10 00 John Arnold 02 14 00 02 02 00 John Jones or. 18 00 675 April 24 th 1676 01 08 02 Anthony Ravinscroft " Sam 03 17 00 Alliu " 01 06 00 01 01 00 John Dunster 07 06 06 04 10 00 June 24 th 1676 04 16 10 Richard Silvester o;i 03 00 06 19 04 Thomas Bishop 0!) 00 00 00 10 00 Benjamin Norden or, 00 00 01 00 00 John Wild 09 05 08 675 John Knight 11 02 08 03 18 08 John Hall 11 09 00 04 10 00 George Ebern 01 04 00 04 Oo 00 Edward Bishop 07 03 02 75 Jonathan Poole, Capt. Of> 00 00 01 02 04 Joseph Hartshorn Of> 06 08 03 06 00 Samuel Neal 08 00 00 01 04 00 John French 10 15 00 75 Increas Whetston 07 03 02 01 04 00 Thomas Burges 07 19 02 William Chubb 07 18 or. 09 00 00 Jonathan Poole, Capt. 44 05 O-i 260 KING PHILIP S WAR. William Rayment 04 02 07 Thomas Eaton 02 14 10 Thomas Sparks 03 08 06 Samuel Gatchell 02 14 10 Zechariah Herrick 03 08 07 Isaac Foster 04 05 08 John Clark 03 08 06 Benony Mactonell 00 10 02 William Elliot 02 01 00 James Carr 02 18 01 Benjamin Collins 03 10 00 John Dunton 05 09 08 Uzall Wardall 03 08 07 John Dethsidy 04 05 08 July 24 th 1676 Joseph Norman 02 15 08 Thomas Cooke 09 18 00 Francis Cooke 01 01 03 Joshuah Boynton 02 07 00 John Prescott 00 12 00 William Bond 01 00 00 Nehemiah Tottingham 00 10 02 Daniel Smith 01 05 06 Joseph Peirce 00 17 00 August 24 th William Duty 00 15 08 Robert Simpson 03 12 00 Joshuah Sawyer 01 00 00 Samuel Nicholson 01 04 00 Jonathan Poole 13 14 00 Thomas Smith 01 13 04 Humphrey Willard als. John Pengilly 04 07 03 Millard 00 10 02 Joseph Jacobs 02 14 10 Benjamin Merifield 00 10 02 George Crosse 02 14 00 Thomas Hoppin 00 09 04 Elisha Fuller 02 14 10 Joseph Hartshorn 02 16 00 John Randall 00 19 08 Timothy Hewitt 08 19 08 James Miller 00 18 06 Israel Howing 00 10 02 Samuel Graves 02 01 03 William Pashly 00 18 00 John Hascall 02 14 00 Josiah White 05 18 09 John Day 04 10 00 William Deane 01 01 09 William Day 00 10 02 John Parker 00 10 02 Joseph Burrell 01 04 00 Henry Duen 01 00 06 John Smith 01 10 10 Nathaniel Bray 02 14 00 John Fitch 03 00 10 Richard Wood 00 17 00 John Ellitt 03 06 03 James Chute 01 10 10 Jonathan Moss 01 10 10 Thomas Woolson 00 08 06 Moses Chadwell 01 08 00 Sebius Jackson 01 11 05 Samuel Fisk 01 04 00 Thomas Browne 00 04 03 Samuel Stainwood 04 10 00 Henry Spring 00 07 00 John Long 00 17 00 Joseph Sherman 01 07 00 Jacob Pudenter 01 04 00 John Stone 01 11 00 James Atkeson 00 11 00 John Graves 05 06 04 Richard Hall 07 19 04 Stephen Pain 00 08 06 John Elsmore 01 02 06 Josiah Jones 00 15 08 Caleb Ray 00 10 04 Robert Mann 01 18 06 Thomas Vely 01 10 10 John Sterns 00 08 06 William Stacey 00 12 00 John Oyne 00 15 06 September 23 d 1676 Nathaniel Robins 00 12 10 John Flanders 02 14 10 Thomas Chamberlaine 03 18 10 Henry Bragg 04 05 08 Worke done ffor y 6 Soulders byy e order of Capt: Poole & Commesary Coaleman of Hattfeild December y e 10 th 1675 by Jacob Gardener William Arnall Imprimis. 1 paire of Shewes & } o- 17- 00 Vamping a paire of bootes } John Watson 2 paire of Shewes . . . ~. 0: 16: 00 Anthouey Ravenscraft 1 pair of Bootes . . . 1: 00: 00 CAPT. BRATTLE S FAMILY. 261 John Downing 1 paire of Shewes . . . . 0: 08: 00 Javish Musgrove 1 paire of Shewes . . . ,-. 0: 08: 00 Hue Pike 1 paire of Shewes 0: 06: 00 Robert Symson 2 paire of Shewes . . . . 0: 16: 00 Epheram Rigman 1 paire of Shewes . . . . 0: 08: 00 John Arnall 1 paire of Shewes & Stockins . . 0: 14: 00 Thomas Burges 1 paire of Shewes . . . . 0: 08: 00 William Briggs 1 paire of Shewes . . . . 0: 05: 00 Jeremy Clothier 1 paire of Bootes . . . . 1: 00: 00 Richard Silvester 1 pair of Shewes . . . . 0: 08: 00 John Hall 1 paire of Shewes 0: 08: 00 Mosses Knapp 1 paire of Shewes .... 0: 08: 00 Richard Smith 1 paire of Shewes .... 0: 08: 00 Robert Coates 1 paire of Shewes .... 0: 08: 00 Joseph Harts home 1 paire of Shewes . . . 0: 08: 00 Tho: Brian 1 paire of Shewes and pouch ... 0: 09: 00 Will: Chub 1 paire of Shewes 0: 08: 00 John Hues 1 paire of Shewes ..... 0: 08: 00 Benjamine Barret 1 paire of Shewes .... 0: 08: 00 These is to Sertiffie y e Honoured Commetty ; that these two bills was delivered by y e order of Capt. Poole & my Self ffor y e use of the soul- ders and Rec d by the solgers, by me John Coaleman comisarey of Hatfield. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 83. CAPT. THOMAS BRATTLE AND HIS MEN. Thomas Brattle was born about 1624. Was a merchant of good standing in Boston in 1656 ; was of the Artillery Company in 1675. He was an enterprising land-purchaser, and bought large tracts on the Kennebec and the Merrimac, the latter of the Indians. He owned valuable iron works at Concord, and was deputy from that town from 1678-1681 ; also from Lancaster, 1671- 2. Was one of the founders of the Old South Church, and in 1671 one of the commissioners sent to treat with Philip at Taunton ; and in nearly all the relations of public life he appears as one of the most active and influential men of the colony. He married, probably in 1656, Elizabeth Tyng, daughter of Capt. William and Elizabeth (Coytemore) Tyng, whose tragic death, Nov. 9th, 1682, is recorded in Judge SewalPs Diary. Their children, born in Boston, were Thomas, born Sept. 5, 1657, died same day; Thomas, born June 20, 1658 ; Elizabeth, born Nov. 30th, 1660 ; William, born Nov. 22, 1662 ; Katharine, born Sept. 26, 1664 ; Bethiah, born Aug. 13, 1666 ; Mary, born Aug. 10, 1668 ; Edward, born Dec. 18, 1670. Thomas Brattle was appointed Cornet of the Suffolk troop, May 30th, 1670 ; Lieutenant, Oct. 13, 1675 ; Captain, May 5, 1676. When the war broke out, Capt. Brattle was an immediate and important friend of the colony. He loaned the colony two hundred pounds, and in the first few months of 262 KINO PHILIP S WAR. the war he is personally credited with cash, supplies and service to the amount of fifteen hundred pounds upon the treasurer s accounts. Sept. 8, 1675, the Council orders Cornet Thomas Brattle, with a party of horsemen under his command, to take fifty soldiers who are appointed to meet him at Leftenant Thomas Hench man s, in Groton, and distribute them according to his discretion in the towns of Dunstable, Groton and Lancaster ; and to arrange with the inhabitants for the support and aid of their garrisons ; also to settle affairs, so far as possible, with the friendly Indians at Wamesit, Nashoba and Marlborough, to induce the chief Wannalancet to return and live quietly at Wamesit, giving his son as a hostage into the hands of the English, etc. The issue of this affair will appear in the account of the Pennacooks. Capt. Brattle was engaged in the organization and supply of the several expeditions west and south. He was personally with the forces at Narraganset, in the reorganization of the army after the Swamp Fight. On May 15th, 1676, in the expedition to Hassanamesit under Capt. Henchman, Capt. Brattle, with a party of horse, fell upon the Indians between Mendon and Hassanamesit and killed about twenty, of whom four were squaws. The enemy dispersed into the swamps, and the main body escaped. On May 24th, Capt. Brattle " with a troope of horse," about fifty, went in pursuit of the Indians "that had newly done spoyle at Seaconcke." With a small party of foot, he arrived at the Falls of "Pocatuck River," being on the Seaconck side. The Indians appeared on the opposite side in force. Leaving the foot behind, Capt. Brattle led the troopers up the river, where they crossed with great difficulty, and soon came down upon the Indians and put them to a disastrous flight, capturing large store of their fish and other supplies, killing several. One of the English was killed, and Cornet Elliot was wounded in the hand. The dead soldier was carried to Seaconck and buried. An Indian boy was captured who testified that these Indians were three or four hundred, and belonged to "Nep- sachuit." See Col. Records, vol. v. p. 96, the full letter of the General Court. June 30th, 1676, Capt. Brattle is sent on an expedition towards Mount Hope with instructions as follows : Instructions for Capt. Thomas Brattle. You are to take twenty of your Troope with such officers as you shall see meete, together with an officer & ten Troop of Left. Hassey s Troope and with them to march with all expedition to Ded- ham where are ordered to be an officer with eighteen foote souldiers mounted from Dorchester, sixe from Roxbury and twenty from Dedham with an officer. All appointed to be at Dedhaui the Rende- CAPT. SEATTLE S INSTRUCTIONS. 263 vous this day at fewer of the clock this afternoone, whom you are to take under your Conduct and the officers and souldiers are Required to obey you as theire Commander for this Service of the Country. You are to march with your Troopers & Dragoons to be at John Wood cocks by midnight where you shall meete with an Indian Pylot and two files of musketeers which Pylot hath engaged to bring you upon Phillip and his Company who are not above thirty men as he saith & not ten miles from Woodcocks ; be sure to secure your Pylot to prevent falsehood and escape. You are to endeavour with your utmost diligence to Come up with the enemy and Coming up with him, or any other of them, you are to subdue kill and destroy, in your marches take heed of Ambushments and see you keepe your souldiers in Comand and that they moove with as much sylence as may be, that you be not prevented. In case the ennimy should be past to Mount Hope and that you Can meete with Plymouth forces you are to Joyne with them. If upon Intelligence you may probably Come up with ennemy to fight subdue & destroy them. ffor that you are victualled onely for sixe days, you are to order that your march out may be proportionably thereto for your Returne unless by the longer stay you shall see you have very probable ad vantage against the enemy & you may have Recruite of proper officers from our Confederates or cann give timely notice to us to send you supply. In case you meete not with a Pylot at Woodcoks you are to send to Mr. Newman at Rehoboth and lett him know of your being there, and wayting to endeavour to surprise Phillip ; And In case that faile, if upon Intelligence you have opportunity to fall upon any other of the enuemy you are to attend that ; Upon all occasions & opportunity you are to Advise us of your motions and of Gods dealings with you ; for your so doing these are your order and warrant. Given at Boston the thirtieth day of June 1676. By the Gouvemour & Council of the Massachusetts. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, pp. 24, 25. J. L. G. In this expedition Capt. Mosely was joined, as related by Mr. Hubbard. The plan was carried out, but when they arrived at the swamp they found the wily chief and his body guard " newly gone." They, however, joined with the Plymouth forces under command of Major Bradford, and succeeded, before their return home in the latter part of July, in securing the Plymouth and southern towns, and in killing or capturing one hundred and fifty of the enemy. Capt. Thomas Brattle died April 5th, 1683. He left, it is said, the largest estate l in New England at that time. His son *In the old Court files, Book 8, is preserved the following, which may be of interest as describ ing Capt. Brattle s Keunebec grant : " Thomas Brattle in behalf of himself & other the Heirs of Capt. Thomas Brattle, Mr. Antipas Boyes, Mr. Edward Tyng & John Winslow claims a certain Tract of Land in America in or between & extending from the utmost Bounds of Cobbeseconte which adjoineth to the River of Kennebeck towards the Western Ocean, and a Place called the Falls at Nequamkeek & a Place of fifteen English Miles on both Sides the River called Keiinebeck River & all the said River that lyeth within the said limits & bounds Eastward, Westward, Northward & Southward as per Deed from the Govern mt of Plimouth Colony dated 27 Octo r 1661 & Orderly recorded. " A true copy Examined pr THO" CLAKKE Dep^ Sec ty." 264 KING PHILIP S WAR. Thomas administered upon the estate. This son Thomas gradu ated at Harvard, 1676, and was eminent for his scholarship, especially in mathematics. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London, which was a mark of great distinction to an American. He was celebrated for his opulence, talents and benevolence ; was treasurer of Harvard College from 1693 to his death, May 18, 1713. He was never married. William Brattle, second son of Capt. Thomas, graduated at Harvard College in 17&Q, and received degree of B.D. in 1692, and in 1696 was ordained pastor of the church in Cambridge. He was a celebrated scholar and preacher, being especially liberal for his time. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Nathaniel Hayman, of Charles- town, Nov. 3, 1697, and by her had two sons, of whom William, the eldest, inherited his grandfather s Narraganset claim. Soldiers Credited under Capt. Thomas Brattle. October 19, 1675 George Berbeck Dec. 20 th John Paison Caleb Graunt Samuel Thacher Thomas Brattle, Lieut. John Bennet John Willington Solomon Phips Samuel Williams Samuel Minott William Kent Samuel Payson March 24 th 1676 John Needham John Bennitt August 24 1676 Ebenezer Williams Joshuah Henshaw William Kent John Newell Richard Scott John Pinder James Chevers James Francklin John Oynes John Barrett Justinian Holden Joseph Birch Thomas Leonard Moses Paine John Waiard als. Ware Obediah Wood 5 00 10 00 Hugh Taylor Jonathan Atherton 00 15 08 01 10 00 Ebenezer Heiden 01 11 05 00 10 00 John Bennett 02 02 09 00 10 00 Richard Francis 01 00 00 00 10 00 01 05 00 Denis Syhy Moses Paine 02 17 09 01 08 07 00 10 00 John Smith 00 12 09 00 10 00 Richard Hall 01 18 10 00 10 00 Paltiel Grover 01 12 10 00 10 00 Thomas Adams 00 15 08 00 10 00 Francis Cooke 01 00 00 00 10 00 Samuel Williams 01 17 06 00 17 00 John Wells 02 17 00 6 John Needham 01 12 10 00 14 02 01 14 02 John Long Elisha Foster 01 05 06 01 04 08 Samuel Maxfield 01 04 08 01 12 10 Evan Jones 01 04 08 01 07 06 02 11 00 Wm. Harsey als. Hasye John Needham 01 12 10 00 07 00 00 19 08 David Freeman 01 03 06 02 02 00 00 15 08 Benjamin Mills John Pason 01 03 06 00 10 00 00 18 09 Samuel Church 01 07 00 00 15 08 John Stearnes 01 07 00 00 15 08 Josiah Jones 01 02 00 01 12 10 00 15 08 IncreasTwingals.WinneOl 12 10 Patrick Morrene 01 00 00 01 12 10 00 15 08 01 11 05 Timothy Dwight Henry Spring John Kendall 00 15 04 01 07 00 01 12 10 01 14 03 00 15 08 Ephraim Regimant Thomas Holman 01 00 00 02 02 10 CAPT. BRATTLE S COMPANY. 265 Timothy Dwight Joshuah Lambe 00 08 08 02 02 10 Francis Coard 01 00 00 Thomas Robinson 00 18 08 September 23 d Thomas Browne 1676 01 02 10 Samuel Gary John Winter 00 19 08 01 02 10 James Bird 00 12 09 Timothy Hawkins Daniel Smith 01 00 00 01 02 10 John Tolman 02 01 05 Edward Couch 01 04 06 John Turtle 01 12 10 Samuel Stone 01 02 10 Thomas Peirce 01 12 10 Zechariah Fowle 00 08 06 John Blackman 00 10 02 James White 01 02 08 Samuel Parker 01 03 06 James Pemerton 00 14 03 Daniel Greenland 01 12 10 Anthony Howard 01 08 06 Daniel Champney 01 02 10 Joseph Sherman 01 07 00 William Bond 01 02 10 James Baker 01 04 06 Daniel Ruff 01 04 00 William Ager 01 05 08 John Allice 01 02 02 Richard Wood 01 17 00 Joshuah Sayer 01 14 03 Thomas Pemberton 03 05 08 John Mason 01 12 10 Nathaniel Rowleston 01 02 10 James Miller 01 00 00 Charles Davenport 00 13 00 Jonathan Gilbert 02 00 00 Samuel Sumner 00 19 08 XIX. CAPT. JOSEPH SILL AND HIS MEN. TOSEPH SILL (or as it is variously spelled, Syll, Scill and tl Scyll) was the son of John and his wife Joanna, of Cam bridge, 1637-8, and was born there about 1639. He married, December 5, 1660, Jemima, daughter of Andrew and Elizabeth (Danf orth) Belcher, of Cambridge, and had children Andrew, born February 5, 1665-6, died June 12, 1666 ; Joseph, bpt. 11 Mar. 1666, d. young ; Jemima, born September 21, 1667, who married, December 21, 1687, John Hall, of Medford, and inherited for him her father s Narraganset claim ; Elizabeth, born September 12, married, November 12, 1685, Samuel Green, Jr. ; Andrew and Thomas, of whose births no record is found. Mr. Savage says that he removed to Lyme, Conn., at the close of Philip s war, and there married, February 12, 1678, his second wife, Sarah Marvin, widow of Reynold, and daughter of George Clark, by whom he had Joseph, born January 6, 1679 ; Zachariah, born January 1, 1682 ; perhaps others. Capt. Sill was called into military life early in the war, and served almost continually, in important times and places, till its close. When Capt. Richard Beers marched with his company up to relieve the garrison at Brookfield, Aug. 5th, 1675, Sill was his lieutenant, and shared the fortunes of the company in that cam paign ; was probably in the fight at " Sugar-Loaf Hill " on August 25th ; but was probably left at Hadley in command of the rest of the company when Capt. Beers, and his twenty-six men, marched to the relief of Northfield on September 3d, and were ambushed and nearly all slain on the 4th, on what is since known as " Beers s Plain." After that disaster he remained in command of the remnant of the company for the rest of the cam paign, and up to October 5th, when he is mentioned in Capt. Mosely s letter as having gone with Captain Appleton and a com pany of one hundred and ninety men to protect Springfield. On October 4th a letter from the Council to Major Pynchon directs that " Lieut. Scill be dismissed home to his family," and his soldiers to make up some of the other companies as the Major thinks best. In a letter from Capt. Appleton at Hadley, October 17th, Capt. CAPT. SILL S INSTRUCTIONS. 267 Sill is mentioned as being still in command of a company of sixty men ; but he had evidently returned home before November 1st, as upon the 2d he was called out again and given commission with the following instructions ; Orders and Instructions for Capt. Joseph Syll. By virtue of An order pr. Council impowring mee to give you Instruc tions &c. 1] You are to Take charge of the soldiers raised from Charlestown, Wattertown & Cambridge ; which are about sixty men ; & being fitted & furnished with Arms, Ammunition & provision for a weeke ; you are to march away; forthwith to Naticke & there take such trusty indian guides with you (as Corporall watson hath p r pared for that purpose) & then march away w th all conv nt speed to Hassanamesitt (an indian plantation neare nipmuck River) from whence you are to send intelli gence unto Captain Daniel Henchman who with his company is marched to Mendon ; informing him y you are ordered to joyne with him to pursue the enimy, whom we heare is come down to a place called Packachooge about 7 miles from Hassanamesit Norwest, & hath killed and surprised some of o r neighbour Indians that were gathering corne there ; and as wee have ground to feare hath lately Attacked marlborow. 2] Being joyned with Capt. Henchman you are to be under his order and joyntly to seeke out for the enimy at y e said place or any other place where you can understand hee is ; and if you meet the enimy you are to use your best skill & force to surprise, sease kill and destroy the enimy ; and to receive and release any of our friends either English or Indians y are taken or injured by him ; 3] You are to be very careful to send forth scouts ; before you to discou r the enunies quarters & if it may bee to com upon him in the night. 4] You are carefully so to march y r men in the woods so y* if it be possible to avoide or shuune or well serch before you com to neare all thick places as swamps or thicketts wher the enimy uses with subtility to lurk in Ambushments. 5] You are in all yo r Attempts & enterprises to have yo r harts lifted up to God in Ch* Jesus ; who is the Lord of hosts & God of armies that hee will give his p r sence with you & assistance unto you & yo r Company in all yo r undertakings not trusting or relying upon the Ai me of flesh but upon the Lord alone from whose greatness Blessing & p r sence all good comes. 6] And you are carefully so to demeane yo r selfe in yo r conv r sation y l you may give yo r soldiers a good example in piety & vertue & so govern the soldiers under yo r command y l yo r campe may bee holynes to y c Lord & to this end you have y e military laws printed and pub lished, which are for yo r rule & direction in that matter. 7] If you finde a considerable quantity of corue at Packachooge if yu can save it wee give it you and yo r soldiers together w th Capt. Henchman and his soldiers for plunder. So desiring the ever living Lord God to accompany you & yo r com pany with his gratious conduct and presence, And that he will for Chts sake approve in all the mounts of difficulty ; & cover all yo r heads 268 KING PHILIP S WAR. in the day of Battle & deliver; the blood-thirsty & cruel enimy of God & his people into yo r hands, & make you executioners of his just Indignation upon them and returne you victorious unto us We comitt you & yo r company unto God & remaine Yo r very Loving freind DANIEL GOOKIN, Sen . 1 November the 2 d 1675. These orders & Instructions past by the Councill November 2, 1675. E. R. S. [Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 40.] The account of this expedition has been given in part in connection with Capt. Henchman s company, but many addi tional particulars, and, indeed, the most reliable account attain able now is given in Gen. Daniel Gookin s account of the "Praying Indians." It would seem by his account that the chief cause of this expedition of Henchman and Sill was the capture by the hostile Indians of three of the villages of the "Praying "or "Christian" Indians, viz.: Magunkog (Hopkin- ton), Hassanamesit (Graf ton) and Chobonokonomum (Dudley). Capt. Sill was at Hassanamesit on November 6th, having with him as guides six of the Natick " Praying Indians," of whom the .principal were James Quannapohit and Eleazer Pegin. These two, with about a dozen of the company, went out to scout, and discovered seven hostile Indians leading away a white boy captive. The hostiles fled, but were so closely pursued by the Natick scouts that they were forced to abandon the boy, who was taken by our Indians and brought back to Capt. Sill. This boy s name was Christopher Muchin, a servant or apprentice of Peter Bent, a miller at Marlborough ; and he told the Captain that he was seized the day before at Bent s mill, and that Bent s son, a lad of about nine years, was taken at the same time, scalped and left for dead who, however, recovered. After this Capt. Sill s company joined with Capt. Henchman s, and under the latter s command all marched to a place called Packa- chooge (southerly part of Worcester), and there encamped for one night in two large wigwams recently left by the Indians. In this place, as well as in others on the way, quantities of corn were discovered, and much of it burned, but no Indians were found except by the small scouting parties led by the Naticks. The companies marched back to Hassanamesit and there sepa rated before November 10th, and Capt. Sill marched with his company to Marlborough and Sudbury, where he was located on November 16th, but marched to Springfield immediately, and on the 20th, in the disposal of the troops by Major Appleton into the garrisons for the winter, thirty-nine of his men were left at Springfield under command of Lieut. Niles. Capt. Sill was thereafter employed in guarding the supplies and conducting 1 Thus signed, and then scratched out and the Council s authority substituted by the Secretary, as shown on next page. AT GROTON AND VICINITY. 269 affairs, under Major Willard s orders, at the various garrisons as there was need, and was with the army at Narraganset after the Swamp Fight. He was sent with a company of dragoons, with some sixty carts, to bring off the inhabitants of Groton. The line of carts was said to be over two miles long, and the convoy of some fifty men very inadequate when stretched out to that length. This line was ambushed and attacked, but either the Indians were too few in number, or the long line of carts, with their guard, was too formidable or awkward to handle, so that having killed two of the advance guard at their first fire, and the guards not being thrown into confusion by the attack, but quickly rallying under their captain and preparing for defence, the Indians, after a few desultory shots from their safe covert, retired. The following paper will show something of the kind of service in which Capt. Sill was engaged during this time. At a Councill held at Boston the 21 st of 1 : Month, 1675-6 It is ordered that Capt. Syll give forth his orders to the several Constables of Charlestowne, Cambridge, Watterton, Sudbury & Marl boro forthwith to send in to him the horses & men y* were under his command formerly for the carriage of Ammunition and provision from Northbrow to Brookfield (or in default y r of to impresse so many) & Maj r Willard is ordered forthwith to appoynt said Cupt. Syll : twenty troopers & Dragoones of Essex & Norfolke men to guard the said to the place appointed ; and after the delivery of the said provisions & Ammunition at the Garrison there the said Syll is ordered to returne home and dismiss the said Horses & men & Returne the troopers & dragooues to Maj r Willard & attend his further orders. It is further ordered y l Capt. Syll cause the Coopers at Cambridge & Charlestowne to make so many 4 gallon runletts to put powder in as may suffice to carry 200 lb powder from Marlborow to Brookfeild for the Country service. Past E. R. S. It is ordered by the Council, That the Commissary of Marlborow deliver to Capt. Syll such Ammunition and Provisions as his horses and Company cau carry to Brookfield & after y e delivery of y e same to him, the said Commissary is to returne home, comittmg what is remaining of the magazine at Maryborough unto Decon William Ward s care. E. R. S. [Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 170.] Mr. Hubbard, in his History, says : After this April 17. Capt. Sill being appointed to keep Garrison at Groton, some Indians coming to hunt for Swine, three Indians drew near the Garrison-house supposing it to have been deserted; two of them were slain by one single shot made by the Captain s own Hands, and the third by another Shot made from the Garrison. 270 KING PHILIP S WAR. On April 27th six companies were raised, three of foot under Capts. Sill, Cutler and Holbrook, the horse under Capts. Brattle, Prentice and Henchman, and sent to repress certain " Insolen- cies " of the enemy, and to range the woods towards Hassana- mesit. There, guided by the Natick scouts, our horsemen fell upon quite a large party of the enemy and captured or killed sixteen, account of which has heretofore been given in the chapter devoted to Capt. Henchman. These forces were released on May 10th, owing to the trouble some distempers resulting from an " epidemical cold " at that time prevalent throughout the country ; but the release was only till such time as the troops had generally recovered and were needed. The occasion came, and on May 30th the same forces were called out again and marched to Brookfield, where they were to meet the forces of Connecticut ; but they came upon a body of Indians, " fishing in Weshacom Ponds towards Lancaster," of whom they killed seven, and captured twenty-nine, the latter mostly women and children. This affair occurred on May 7th, and necessitated delay and a return to Marl borough for supplies, so that when they arrived at Brookfield the Connecticut forces had marched to Hadley, where ours joined them on the 14th, two days after that place had been attacked by a large body of the enemy, who, busily watching the advance of our forces from Marlborough, seemed to have missed the Connecticut companies coming into the town, and were surprised at their presence, and fled precipitately when a shot from a small cannon struck an out lying house which some of them were plundering. The Con necticut soldiers pursued them for some miles up the river, and killed several, but could not overtake or flank them. The Massa chusetts troops arrived on May 14th, and the united forces, with the Mohegans, amounted to about one thousand men. Major Talcott, with the Connecticut troops, on the 16th, marched up on the west side of the river, and Capt. Henchman with those of Massachusetts on the east side. A heavy rain-storm prevailed during several days, drenching them, and spoiling most of their ammunition and provision. They returned to Hadley on the 18th, and Major Talcott two days later marched homeward with his force, while Capt. Henchman with his troops remained several days diligently searching for the enemy ; but not finding them, and fearing they were gathering towards the eastern towns, he marched homeward about June 24th. Capt. Henchman s letter (ante, page 57) gives an account of the experiences on this march home. Capt. Sill was selected to command a force con sisting of about one hundred foot, a troop of horse and the com pany of friendly Natick Indians, and to scout from Quonsigamon pond towards Wachuset and thence to " Nashaway and the Weshakem Ponds," and join the main force, awaiting probably at Brookfield or Marlborough. The result of this scouting expedi- CAPT. SILL AT THE EASTWARD. 271 tion under Capt. Sill is not found recorded. The enemy were now scattered towards Plymouth Colony and into the eastern parts, about Dover, Wells, and as far as Casco Bay. The main part of the troops in this campaign was dismissed early in July, but about the first of September we find Capt. Sill again in command of a company and marching to the eastward to protect the frontier settlements now threatened by the many hostile Indians who had taken refuge with the tribes in those parts. At Dover, on September 6th, his company, together with that of Capt. Hathorne, found four hundred Indians who were gathered at Dover at Major Waldron s, with whom the neighbor ing tribes had made peace. The Captains Hathorne and Sill were commissioned to seize and kill all Indians who had been con cerned in the war, and there were many of these mixed in with the peaceful tribes and had come hither under their protection and pledge. The Captains urged their commission, and Major Waldron urged his duty and pledge of hospitality ; but find ing them determined he compromised the matter by planning a stratagem by which some two hundred of the hostile Indians were made prisoners, while Wannalancet and his Pennacooks, Ossipees and Pequakets were allowed to depart unharmed. The account of this transaction will properly fall under the chapter concerning Major Waldron. Two days after this affair these companies, together with some of Major Waldron s and Capt. Frost s men, marched on to the eastward as far probably as Falmouth, but, finding no enemy and all the settlements deserted or destroyed, they returned to Piscataqua, and were in these parts on October 3d, as men tioned in a letter of Gen. Denison to the Council. Capts. Sill, Hunting and Frost are said to be there under com mand of Capt. Hathorne. It was there, about this time, that some insubordination or other objectionable conduct occurred, which occasioned the following action of the Court on October 17th, 1676 : Whereas Capt. Joseph Scyll hath therefore binn imployed in the countrys service, as commander of a company, & that information is given that of late he hath carried himself offencively in that place, this Court doth thefore order, that the said Scyll be forthwith dischardged from that imploy, & some other meet person appointed in his room. [Colony Records, vol. vi. p. 126.] I find no explanation of this in any other place, and no subse quent action by the Court concerning Capt. Sill, save that indicated in the answer to the petition below, which appears also in Colony Records, vol. v. p. 506. Mr. Hubbard s account indi cates that Capt. Sill still held his command, and went with Capt. Hathorne on the march in November, 1676, to Ossipee and 272 KING PHILIP S WAR. Pequaket. Sometime before November 7, 1681, Capt. Sill removed to Lyme, Conn., where he was living at that date. He died at Lyme, August 6, 1696. His son Thomas was a ship master, lived in Boston in 1699, and was probably the Capt. Sill who died there in May, 1709. Credited under Capt. Joseph Syll. November 30 th 1675 Benjamin Dowse Joshua Begalow John Bond James Kellon Samuel Cutler George Dell 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 00 04 04 04 03 Jonathan Smith Isaac Larned Paul Wilson Nathaniel Hely John Chadwick Gershom Swan Nath 1 Sanger Samuel Peirce Samuel Butterick Roger Jones Joseph Syll December 20 th 1675 Daniel Warrin 00 Joseph Waite 00 William Sheaf 01 Nathaniel Frothingham 00 William Bodman 00 Peter Frothingham 00 Amos Marrett 00 Zachariah Brigden 00 Samuel Cooke 00 William Brown 00 John Bicknell 00 Thomas Moussell 01 Timothy Cutler 00 James Smith 00 Elnathan Beeres 00 Nathaniel Bersham 00 John Oyne 00 Thomas Hamond 00 John Barnard 00 William Richardson 00 Thomas Rand 00 Joseph Dana 00 Thomas White 01 January 25 th 1675-6 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 00 14 16 16 16 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 02 06 06 06 00 06 00 00 00 06 09 10 04 14 06 03 08 17 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 04 02 02 14 14 14 14 14 17 14 14 00 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 03 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 04 09 Andrew Stimson 00 14 06 Samuel Gibson 00 William Barret, Lt. 01 John Craig 00 John Hastings 00 Jason Russell 00 John Squire 00 Samuel Buck 00 Samuel Robins 00 Abraham Spencer 01 Solomon Prentis 00 John Simpull 00 John Melven 00 John Crumwell 00 John Bradshaw 01 James Holland 00 Benjamin Rice 00 William Crouch 01 Thomas Foster 01 Josuah Eaton 00 February 29 th 1675-6 Joseph Syll, Capt. 07 Thomas Hovey 02 Benjamin Russell 01 Robert Burdall 01 John Foskett 00 Obadiah Searl 01 March 24 th 1675-6 Zachariah Sawtell 02 John Barrett 01 Abraham Cosens 01 James Wheeler 01 John Gleeson 01 April 24 th 1676 Daniel Magennis 02 Thomas Adams 01 Thomas Talley 01 William Pashly 01 Thomas Polly 00 Samuel Cleavelaud 02 William Vines 01 Daniel Hudson 02 Richard Taylor 00 Jonathan Crisp 01 Thomas Whitney 03 17 00 03 08 16 02 17 00 14 06 14 06 14 06 14 06 19 00 09 06 14 06 14 06 14 06 05 08 09 04 12 00 19 04 04 05 14 06 10 00 00 00 10 00 10 00 18 00 10 00 05 04 10 00 08 02 08 02 08 02 08 00 08 02 06 06 12 06 15 04 04 06 09 02 02 00 14 10 13 00 11 00 CREDITS UNDER CAPT. SILL. 273 Philip Jones 03 01 00 July 24 th 1676 June 24 th 1676 Joseph Clark 11 05 03 George Adams 01 08 02 Moses Whitney 03 05 00 Samuel Lampson 02 19 06 John Goodwin 02 18 00 Thomas Adams 01 08 02 Samuel Damman 00 17 00 Joseph Peirce 01 06 00 John Fisk 03 12 00 James Bernard 03 05 00 Hopewell Davis 01 09 00 Francis Shepheard 01 05 08 Nathaniel Kettle 00 18 00 Ephraim Bemish 03 05 00 Jonathan Gary 01 05 00 Josiah Hobbs 03 06 00 Thomas Mitchinson 02 13 00 Josiah Clarson 02 07 10 Richard Woods 01 06 06 Joseph Simons 02 07 10 Henry Salter 01 10 10 Sebread Taylor 02 07 00 August 24 th 1676 Henry Harris 02 06 02 John Chapman 02 08 10 Jonathan Laurence 01 14 06 Jonathan Barker 01 06 06 Joseph Lambson 01 05 08 Jonathan Remmington 09 08 08 Zachariah Brigden 02 08 00 William Stephens 03 13 08 Joseph Bickner 01 05 08 Ambros Mackfassett 02 18 00 Jacob Amsdeii 03 00 00 John Tarball 03 13 10 Paul Wilson 01 02 02 Mathew Griffin 04 08 09 William Twing 01 05 08 Thomas Hall 01 10 00 John Chapman 03 19 06 Edward Smith 03 13 00 John Figg 01 05 08 Samuel Scripture 02 04 06 William GUI 03 03 00 Ambros Mackfassett 00 04 02 Simon Rogers 01 05 08 William Tarball 02 04 06 Joseph Smith 01 09 00 Joseph Harris 01 10 00 Theophilus Thornton 01 05 08 John Salter 00 16 02 Nicholas Bullis 01 05 08 Thomas Whitney 00 04 02 Joseph Baternan 01 05 08 Thomas Chadwick 01 10 10 Ambros Mackfassett 00 14 06 Samuel Lord 01 15 10 Moses Wheat 01 10 10 Cornelius Church 03 13 00 Jeremiah Mosse 03 10 00 John Walker 01 10 10 Samuel Lewis 01 10 00 Theophilus Philips 03 12 06 John Barnard 05 15 10 Jacob Waters 00 07 08 Humphrey Miller 02 07 02 Thomas Parker 04 19 09 Thomas Region 01 16 00 Ephraim Philips 02 04 06 Timothy Cutler 01 09 00 Thomas Farmer 02 04 06 Richard Griffin . 01 07 04 John Barbeene 02 15 00 Zechariah Brigdeu 01 09 02 Jonathan Whitney 03 13 08 Joseph Needham 04 01 00 John Eliott 02 07 00 Samuel Taylor 03 06 00 Joseph Symons 01 18 06 Samuel Parry 01 09 02 Jonathan Smith 02 04 06 James Barnard 04 01 00 Ellis Barron 03 18 00 John Gale 01 08 02 John Cutler 01 11 08 Simon Stone 03 11 00 Samuel Perry 01 18 06 John Clary 02 08 00 Benony Macktonnell 03 06 00 Joseph Blanchard 01 08 02 Benjamin Symons 03 00 00 Isaac Emsden 03 12 00 Samuel Gallup 01 06 06 Jonathan Kettle 02 03 08 Jonathan Parker 01 09 00 Samuel Bickuer 01 15 02 Zechariah Cuttin 02 14 10 Hopewell Davis 01 16 00 Henry Prentice 03 10 00 John Mirick 02 03 08 John Streeter 03 06 09 274 KING PHILIP S WAR. Jonathan Parker 01 01 04 Nathaniel Greene 02 04 06 John Weld jn r Benjamin Burges Zechariah Padlefoot 01 06 06 01 06 06 01 06 06 James Atkesson 00 07 08 John Sanders 02 19 00 Joseph Lowe Zacharius Brigden John Bateman 02 09 08 01 00 06 02 07 00 Joseph Waight Thomas Frost 00 15 04 00 14 06 William Ball 00 04 02 Caleb Ray als. Rey William Butter 00 06 10 02 19 02 Zechariah Hicks 01 00 06 Peter Edgerton Joseph Mayo September 23 d John Dunton 03 03 00 02 09 00 1676 01 02 02 Nehemiah Tatingham Thomas Chamberlain 03 05 00 01 09 02 Stephen Francis Justinian Houlding Joseph Holland 01 18 03 00 16 03 02 08 10 John Barnard Humphrey Millard Benjamin Merifield George Dill John Mudg James Miller John S alter Daniel Woodward Hopewell Davis Isaac Laurence James Wallis John Robey Alexander Steward John Parker John Knight Abraham Whitaker Mathew Clark Nicholas Browne John Hartshorn Joseph Syll, Capt. Jacob Bullard Philip Gleson Daniel Maginis Thomas Dawby 00 18 00 03 01 08 00 11 00 01 16 10 03 12 10 00 04 02 00 09 04 00 15 04 02 08 00 14 00 14 06 16 00 02 00 01 00 04 02 00 14 06 02 14 00 02 15 08 02 15 08 02 15 08 02 15 08 06 00 00 02 04 06 00 17 00 04 13 00 00 14 10 The names of those who served under Capt. Sill after Septem ber 23d, 1676, were credited in a later Journal, now lost. The following interesting document explains itself : To the honored Generall Court assembled at Boston the Petition of Joseph Sill, humbly sheweth That your petitioner accounts it a great priviledge that from his child hood he hath bin trained up, and hath spent so many of his dayes under your government, and cannot without singular content and com placency call to minde, that he hath bin honoured to be called forth under your commission, to appear in the field against your enemies, in pursuance of which he did according to his mean ability serve you faithfully, and for length of time and number of expeditions, may (without ostentation be it spoken) compare with most if not any who were listed in your service ; and accounts noe part of his dayes, next to those which have bin improved in the immediate service of God, so well spent as those which have bin imployed in the service of his country and the government, remaining still devoted, in all that he hath and is, unto your service, without any selfish aimes. Yet being well assured that your noble and generous inclinations are not inferior, to his who accounted that day lost in which some or other were not benefited by him, nor to his, who was displeased with such as asked no kindness from him, he must confess that he hath some ambition that it may be manifested that he is not forgotten amongst those that have PETITION OF CAPT. SILL IN 1685. 275 tasted of your beneficence, and humbly craves of the honoured court that you would please to grant to him a small number of acres of that land which hath bin recovered from the enimy, that so a little part of what he hath seen with his eyes and trod with his feet, in your service, may be committed into his hands, and that so he may the more com fortably share in the blessings of these peaceful days wherein men may beat theyr swords into plow shares, and your petitioner shall pray, &c. JOSEPH SILL. The magis trs judg meet to grant the petitioner two hundred acres of Land where he can find it free ; their brethren the Deputys hereto consenting. EDWARD RAWSON, Sec y. The deputyes consent not upon the consideration that this Court hath already granted a plantation of eight miles square in the nepmug coun- trey for the Accommodating such as were souldiers in the Late Warr with whom the petitioner may have his liberty to come in for a settle ment if hee thinke good. RICHARD SPRAGUE, pr order. November y e 19th 1685. [Mass. Archives, vol. 70, p. 148.] XX. VARIOUS OFFICERS AND COMPANIES. LIEUT. WILLIAM HASEY AND HIS COMPANY. WILLIAM HASEY, Boston, as early as 1652, lived at " Pull* ing Point ; " afterwards a large land-owner at Rurnney- Marsh; Artillery Company, 1652; freeman (Hazzey), 1665. By wife Sarah had Esther, born about 1650, married Lieut. Henry Green of Maiden, January 11, 1671, and died Feb ruary 26, 1747 ; William, born Sept. 15, 1652 ; Asa, born Janu ary 1, 1655; Joseph, May 29, 1657; Susanna, May 30, 1660; Martha, baptized April 24, 1665. Lieut. Hasey married, second, May 16, 1681, Mrs. Judith, widow of Capt. Jonathan Poole. He died at Reading, May 30, 1689, aged about 70 years. Cornet William Hasey (or Haisy), May 27, 1674, was ap pointed Lieutenant of the " Three County Troop," of which Edward Hutchinson was Captain and Jonathan Poole was made at same time Cornet; in Philip s war commanded a company in the summer of 1675. I find no connection between this family and William Hearsy of Hingham. William, the son, married Judith, and had William, born De cember 21, 1679 ; Jacob, born August 26, 1684 ; Judith, Abi gail, Martha ; Nathaniel, March 13, 1693 ; and died June 7th, 1695, aged 43, leaving widow Judith, who died November 17, 1718, aged 68 years. Credited under Lieut. William Hasey. Phineas Sprague 00 18 06 October 5 th 1675 Benjamin Barrett 00 18 00 James Barrett 00 18 06 Samuel Weeden 00 18 06 Daniel Greenland 00 18 06 Edward Tuttle 00 18 06 Joseph Weeden 00 08 06 Thomas Wheeler 01 02 03 Thomas Wilson 00 18 06 John Greenland 00 13 00 Thomas Brinkuoll 00 18 06 John Green 00 18 06 William Green, Corpr. 00 15 06 John Green, Corpr. 01 02 03 John Brown, Corpr. 01 02 03 John Eaton 00 18 06 Henry Greene 00 18 06 Samuel Richarson 00 18 06 Thomas Peirce 00 18 06 John Gould 00 18 06 Joseph Wright 00 18 06 John Batchelor 00 18 06 John Kendall 00 18 06 Thomas Hodgman 00 18 06 Josias Brown 00 18 06 CAPT. MANNING AND HIS MEN. 277 Joseph Wing 00 18 06 August 24 th 1676 Increas Wing 00 18 06 Thomas Wheeler 00 17 00 John Brown 00 18 06 John Barrett 00 14 03 Richard Middleton 00 18 06 Increas Wing 00 14 03 Joseph Richardson 00 18 06 John Richeson 00 17 00 William Hasey, Lieut. 02 06 06 Thomas Hodgman 00 14 00 Jonathan Poole, Cornt. 01 17 02 William Greene 00 17 00 Isaac Brookes 00 18 06 Phineas Sprague 00 17 00 July 24 th 1676 Joseph Winn 00 14 03 Nathaniel Richesson 00 14 03 Thomas Brintnall 00 14 03 Samuel Richeson 00 05 09 William Hasey, Lieut. 01 15 09 Stephen Richeson 00 04 03 John Kendall 00 07 00 Isaac Brooks 00 01 06 September 23 d 1676 John Eaton 00 14 03 John Waite 00 14 00 Thomas Peirce 00 14 03 John Greene 00 14 00 Thomas Gery 00 14 03 CAPT. NICHOLAS MANNING, OF IPSWICH, AND HIS MEN. Capt. Nicholas Manning was the son of Richard Manning, of Dartmouth, co. Devon, England, and Anstiss (Galley), and was born there June 23d, 1644. He came to Salem (perhaps as mariner) and married Elizabeth, widow of Robert Gray, June 23d, 1663, and had children Thomas, Nicholas, Margaret, John, born between 1664 and 1668, and all died young. His mother Anstiss, then a widow, came to Salem in 1679, with six children, of whom Thomas, born February 11, 1664 (the young est brother of Nicholas), was the ancestor (gr. grandfather) of Elizabeth Clarke Manning, mother of Nathaniel Hawthorne, the eminent author. Nicholas served in the Mount Hope campaign, June, 1675, in Capt. Paige s Troop, was also in command of a company that marched out to Narraganset to recruit the army after the Great Swamp Fight. His nephew Samuel inherited his Narraganset claim. He was an adherent of the Andros government, and under that was appointed to a judgeship on the Kennebec River, and upon Andros s overthrow he was arrested and imprisoned as one of his followers. Credited under Capt. February 29 th 1675-6 Richard Scott 04 10 00 JohnBallard 01 16 00 AnthonyNeedham,Zrt e?^.10 10 00 Stephen Henrick 01 10 00 Thomas Raymond 01 10 00 Richard George 04 10 00 March 24 th 1675 Abiel Lamb 04 10 00 John Pickard 01 10 00 Nicholas Manning. Samuel Smith 01 Ezekiel Mihill 01 Daniel Gobeley 01 Beckett 01 April 24 th 1676 Samuel Varnam 02 John Rugles 05 June 24 th 1676 John Wheeler 01 Resolved White 02 10 00 10 00 10 00 10 00 00 00 16 00 10 00 10 00 278 KING PHILIP S WAR. John Chapman Edward Colcord Richard Norman Thomas Fuller Ebenezer Prout John Spauldin William Rayment Christopher Palmer Jonathan Moore John Lewis Samuel Johnson Nathaniel Kirkland Joseph Collins Samuel Hartwell 01 01 04 10 00 02 00 00 10 00 10 00 04 10 00 02 00 00 01 16 00 01 08 07 01 12 10 01 16 00 01 10 00 01 16 00 01 10 00 01 10 00 Robert Kinsman 01 10 00 Nicholas Manning, Capt.lS 00 00 Jonathan Fairbanks 04 10 00 Alwin Breed 01 10 00 Caleb Kemball 01 10 00 Elihu Wardall 01 10 00 July 24 th 1676 James Kidd 01 14 00 Henry Farrar 02 10 00 August 24 th 1676 Benjamin White 04 10 00 Palmer 02 08 00 Joseph Smith 02 00 00 CAPT. JONATHAN REMINGTON AND HIS MEN. Jonathan Remington was the son of John of Newbury, 1637, and was born February 12, 1639; settled in Cambridge and married Martha Belcher, daughter of Andrew, July 13th, 1664, and had Martha, born February 18, 1666-7, died April 23, 1669 ; Jonathan, born March 17, 1668-9, died April 16, 1669 ; Martha, born October 28, 1674, married Capt. Nicholas Bowes of Boston, January 19, 1718-19 ; Jonathan, born September 25, 1677 ; Sam uel, born July 11, 1679, died June 3d, 1680 ; Anna, born January 30, 1680-81, married John Hill, June 24th, 1708; John and Mary, who died 1689 and 1690 ; Elizabeth, had a share in the estate ; Sarah, born May 10, 1688, married John Biscoe of Water- town, February 1, 1710-11. Was prominent in public and especially in military affairs, and from 1682 till his death kept the original " Blue Anchor Tavern," Cambridge. He held the position of corporal in the local military company at Cambridge, and was in command of a company during the winter and spring of 1675-6. He was active in the later Indian war, in 1689 at Groton, and in 1691 at Wells and in the eastward parts. He died April 21, 1700, leaving his widow Martha, who died July 16, 1711, and through his son Jonathan left a notable and numer ous posterity. He served with the Cambridge men under Capt. Davenport in the Narraganset campaign, and was in the Swamp fight. In the winter following he was active in the command and supply of some of the garrisons in the interior towns, and was ordered, March 11, 1675-6, to leave " the garrison " and march his soldiers home. His son Jonathan inherited his Narra ganset claim. Credited under Captain Jonathan Remington April 24 th 1676 John King 03 15 00 Aaron Jaques 03 06 00 Joseph G-ridley 03 17 00 William Bishop Peter Hanchett William Haywood Caleb Jackson 03 06 00 04 10 10 04 10 10 04 10 00 CAPT. REYNOLDS MEN. 279 Tobiah Redman William Brown Robert Wills John Burrows Jeremiah Hood Francis Cooke William Smith John Parrum 02 07 02 01 16 00 04 17 06 02 07 02 04 10 10 04 09 10 02 07 02 03 06 00 Richard Higinbottom 03 Richard Sawtell 03 Thomas Thorp 03 June 24 th 1676 John Hollis 04 Samuel Williams \ and his man j 06 00 06 00 06 00 10 10 05 01 00 LIEUT. NATHANIEL REYNOLDS AND HIS MEN. Nathaniel Reynolds, born in England, was the son of Robert and Mary, of Boston as early as 1632. He married Sarah Dwight of Dedham, November 30, 1657. She died July 8, 1663, and he married Priscilla Brackett, of Boston, before February 21, 1666. Children of Sarah, first wife, Sarah, born July 26, 1659, married John Fosdick ; Mary, born November 20, 1660, died aged 2 years, 2 months ; Nathaniel, born March 3, 1662-3. By second wife John, born August 4, 1668, died 1757, aged 88 years ; Peter, born January 26, 1670 ; Philip, born September 15, 1672, died young; Joseph, born January 9, 1677, died January 16, 1759, aged 82 years 7 days ; Hannah, born January 15, 1682, married Samuel Royall; Mary, born 1684? married Nathaniel Woodbury ; Benjamin, born May 10, 1686 (in Bristol) ; Ruth, born Dec. 9, 1688, married Josiah Gary. He was of the Artillery Company 1658, and admitted freeman 1665. He was in command of the garrison at Chelmsford in the fall and winter of 1675-6, and on February 25th the inhabitants petition the Court that he be allowed to remain, with his soldiers, for their protection. He removed to Bristol, R.I., after the war, and was prominent in the organization and development of that town. Credited under Lieut. Nath 1 Reynolds. April 24 th 1676 Thomas Wiborn 00 18 00 June 24 th 1676 Michael Bastow 00 18 00 Humphrey Miller 02 18 00 John Sergeant 00 12 00 Zibeon Leatherland 00 12 00 Digory Sergeant 02 10 06 Joseph Saxton 00 12 00 Azbin Morris 00 12 00 James Mecranell 01 04 00 Joseph Lamson 00 12 00 Thomas Stacy David Couch Joseph Bicknell Joseph Bateman William Twing James Burrell Robert Mason Ephraini Mosse July 24 th 1676 Samuel Peacock 00 August 24 th 1676 Nath l Reynolds, Lieut. 04 03 03 00 00 02 02 00 01 15 04 15 04 12 00 12 00 08 00 03 08 12 04 04 00 14 00 05 00 280 KING PHILIP S WAR. CAPT. JOHN HOLBROOKE, OF WEYMOUTH, AND HIS MEN. Capt. John Holbrooke was the son of Thomas, and the follow ing list from the N. ENGLAND HIST. AND GEN. REGISTER, Vol. xxv. p. 14, serves to fix the date of the family s arrival at Wey- mouth, Mass. Waymouth [England] y e 20 th of March 1635 [-6] Bound for New England [No] 66 Thomas Holbrooke of Broadway aged 34: yeare 67 Jane Holbrooke his wife aged 34 Yeare 68 John Holbrooke his sonne aged 11 yeare 69 Thomas Holbrooke his sonne aged 10 yeare 70 Anne Holbrooke his daughf aged 5 yeare 71 Elizabeth Holbrooke his daughf aged 1 yeare. All the data we have concerning Capt. John show the above age to have been some six years less than that given upon his gravestone, and to have been incompatible with many points in his history. He married Elizabeth Stream, who died June 25th, 1688, aged 64 years ; and second, widow Mary Loring, who sur vived him. His children were John, married Abigail Pierce, daughter of Capt. Michael ; a daughter, married Simon Whit- marsh; Abiezer ; Hannah, married Ephraim Pierce, son of Capt. Michael ; Grace, married Joseph Nash of Boston ; Samuel ; Lois and Eunice, twins ; Eunice, married Benjamin Ludden ; Ex perience, married Joseph Edson ; Ichabod, married Sarah Turner. Capt. Holbrooke was a very enterprising man of business, and his real estate operations were quite extensive for his day. He was also prominent in military affairs, was Lieutenant of the local company, and, August 8th, 1664, was chosen to go upon some service as Lieutenant in the company of Capt. Hudson, but his wife and family being sick at the time, Ensign John Thurston, of Hingham, was appointed in his stead. In the time of Philip s war he was in command of the local company, and in the spring of 1676 was appointed to command one of the com panies raised and sent out to suppress the " Insolencies " of the Indians and to "range the woods towards Hassanamesit." The following papers pertain to that service. Capt. Holbrooke died November 23, 1699, leaving a large estate to his numerous heirs. Concord y e 29 th of Aprill 1676 Hon rd Sirs, According to orders I have obtained here to Concord & this Day have mustered my Company, And have here send the list of those that not appear according to order likewise the names of them y l are here now of my Companey, which are but very Small which is a great Dis couragement to me, therefore my humble request is that I may have my Company made up accordinge to my order of 80 men or else y I CAPT. HOLBROOKE S MEN. 281 may be Dismissed which I have mention to yo r Honno alreadye Iff I should not have a full Company. Some nessarys, I want for the Company I have neither Drume nor Collors, which I Desire that If you thinke it fitt to send me Either houe-boye or a Drumpiter which is very requisitt, having nothing Else att present & remaine Your Honn or8 Most humble Servant JOHN HOLBROOK. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 239. The following paper is doubtless the list referred to : These are to Certifie y e Hon d Major Generall Denison or whome it may Conserne Being ordered to take 82 men under my Command to gether with 28 horses & 14 men to tend them, viz. being order by Major Clarke 39 men from Boston 4 horses 2 men 9 men from Roxbury 4 horses 2 men 9 men from Dorchester 4 horses 2 men 6 men from Dedham 4 horses 2 men 7 men from Brantry 4 horses 2 men 6 men from Weymouth 4 horses 2 men 6 men from Hingham 4 horses 2 men Defects from Boston for non-appearance Jn Pemerton, Jn Porter & Richard Knight From Dorchester non-appearance, Consider Atherton, Henry Wedarton [Withington] , Ebezar Clape. From Waymouth, Zachary Gorney. From Hingham, Jn Feres & Arthur Sherman. p me JOHN HOLBROOKE Cap n Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 12. Credited under Capt. John Holbrooke. June 24 th 1676 Daniel Adams 01 Samuel Adams 01 Denis Sihy 02 August 24 th 1676 Samuel Davis Joseph Lyon Moses Knapp Roger Prosser Paul Gilford Daniel Adams Joseph Walters John Scott John Plum John Harker John Randall Samuel Wales James Sinkler 02 01 03 00 02 04 04 00 01 03 01 01 03 16 00 04 00 10 00 00 00 11 08 10 00 13 08 19 00 12 01 10 00 14 06 10 00 12 00 11 08 12 06 02 06 Jeremiah Conah Benjamin Molton Benjamin Bates James Atkins Samuel Blake Thomas William Isaac How Samuel Spencer Caleb Rey John Whitney John Ellenworth Sept 23 d 1676 Joseph Tucker Thomas Hoppen James Hadlock Thomas Bull John Craft Benjamin Merifield 03 02 06 03 02 06 05 15 10 01 15 00 03 10 08 01 10 00 01 01 04 01 01 04 01 14 02 00 18 00 01 11 08 03 05 00 01 12 06 02 08 00 04 07 06 02 14 10 03 01 08 282 KING PHILIP S WAR. Joshuah Child 01 10 00 Richard Puffer 02 01 00 John Parker 03 01 08 Benjamin Phillips 01 10 10 William Deane 01 15 08 Daniel Harris 01 11 08 William Field 03 00 00 Thomas Betell 04 02 00 John Holbrooke, Capt. 16 01 03 CAPT. JOHN WHIPPLE, OF IPSWICH, AND HIS MEN. The Whipple family in this country undoubtedly descended from Matthew Whipple of Booking, co. Essex, England, a clothier. Will of December 19th, 1616, probated January 28th, 1618, mentions son Matthew, son John, daughters Jane, Eliza beth, Mary, Anne, Johane, Amye ; " my sister, wife of Richard Rathbone ; Hercules Stephens, grandchildren Hercules and Margaret Arthur and Henry and Anne Coldham." The two brothers Matthew and John, who were settled at Ipswich some time before 1638, were probably the sons men tioned above. They settled at the " Hamlet," now the town of Hamilton. John was a deacon or ruling elder of the First Church. He was freeman 1640, and representative for eight years between that and 1653. By first wife he had children Mary, JOHN, Susanna, Sarah, and probably others. Capt. John, son of "Elder" John, as above, born in Essex, England, about 1626, married, first, Martha Reyner, daughter of Humphrey, who died February 24, 1679 ; married, second, Eliza beth Paine, June 28th, 1680. By first wife had children John, born July 15, 1657 ; Matthew, born 1658 ; Joseph, born June 8, 1666 ; Susan, Sarah and Anna. He was appointed Cornet of the Ipswich troop before 1675, and Captain in 1683 in place of Capt. John Appleton. He was Lieutenant in Capt. Paige s Troop at Mount Hope, June, 1675, and was appointed Captain of a troop raised for service under Major Savage in March, 1676 ; was with the army in the unsuccessful manoeuvring of that campaign. In the letter of the Council to Mayor Savage, dated April 1st, 1676, is found the passage, "Touching that Rebuke of God upon Cap* Whiple and y c poore people at Springfield it is a matter of great shame and humbling to us." This was in answer to one from Major Savage of March 28th, dated at Hadley, in which he says that they have had advice from Spring field that eight Indians assaulted sixteen or eighteen men, besides women and children, as they were going to meeting from a place called Long Meadow, " and killed a man and a maid, wounded two men, and carried away captive two women and two children." One of the men killed was John Keep. Mrs. Sarah Keep, his wife, was one of those captured with her child, and died soon from her wounds. Major Savage says, further, that being apprised of that affair and the way the Indians went, he sent out sixteen men in pursuit, who came up with the Indians, who, as soon as they found the English in close pursuit, killed CAPT. JOHN WHIPPLE, OF IPSWICH, AND HIS MEN. 283 the two children, and striking the women with their hatchets upon the head, left them for dead and fled. The horsemen brought back the four bodies, the women being yet alive ; one recovered ; and this disaster was a severe reproach to the guard, who in a popular rhyme of the day are remembered thus : " Seven Indians, and one without a gun, Caused Capt. Nixon and forty men to run." I am inclined to think that by the Council, Capt. Whipple, as commander of the troop, and perhaps at that time with them, was held responsible for the disaster. I know nothing of Capt. " Nixon." Credited under Capt. John Whipple of Ipswich. June 24 th 1676 John Dodge 03 08 06 Marke Hascall 03 08 06 William Smith 03 07 00 Richard Child 03 08 06 Thomas Leaver 03 08 06 Samuel Smith 03 08 06 Daniel Wycome, Qr.Mr.Q5 02 09 Joseph Cask 03 08 06 John Rayment 03 00 00 Thadeus Berry 03 08 06 Moses Cleaveland 03 08 06 John Sawin 03 08 06 John Stone 03 08 06 Samuel Stearnes 03 08 06 John Wait 03 10 00 Samuel Cooper 02 01 00 James Tenney 02 01 00 Samuel Ladd 04 02 00 Christopher Palmer 04 02 04 Samuel Chapman 03 July 24 th 1676 Joseph Taylor 03 James Hobbs 03 Timothy Bread 03 William Dellow 03 Henry Kenny 03 James Lowden 00 Joseph Eaton 03 August 24 th 1676 Thomas Brintnall 03 Thomas Hodgman 00 John Whipple, Capt. 13 Edward Neland 03 Samuel G-iddings 09 Thomas Andrews 03 Ephraim Fellows 03 07 02 08 06 10 00 08 06 08 06 08 06 10 00 08 06 08 06 17 00 14 03 08 06 16 05 06 08 19 00 September 23 d 1676 John Browne 04 02 00 CAPT. JOHN JACOB, OF HINGHAM, AND HIS MEN. Capt. John Jacob was the son of Nicholas, who came from Old Hingham, England, to Hingham, Mass., in 1633, with wife Mary and children John and Elizabeth ; and there had Josiah, Joseph, born May 10, 1646, and four daughters. Nicholas was representa tive in 1648 and 1649, and died June 5th, 1657. Capt. John, born in England, married Margery Eames, Octo ber 20, 1653, and had children John, born October 20, 1654, who, April 19, 1676, was killed by the Indians near his father s house, in what is now South Hingham ; Mary, born March 21, 1656; Sarah, born Sept. 29, 1657; Benjamin, April 2, 1659. First wife died April 7, 1659, and he married, second, October 3, 1661, Mary Russell, daughter of George, and had Jael, born September 7, 1662 ; David, born June 20, 1664 ; Elizabeth, born April 11, 1666; Peter, born February 12, 1668; Hannah, born 284 KING PHILIP S WAR. December 26, 1669 ; Samuel, born November 30, 1671 ; Deborah, born May 15, 1674, died soon ; Deborah, 2d, born August 8, 1677 ; John, 2d, born July 31, 1679; Lydia, born April 18, 1681; Abigail, born Nov. 13, 1683. His will, probated Dec. 31, 1693, names his twelve living children, four sons and eight daughters. He was very active and influential. His house was fortified as a garrison by order of the General Court, Feb. 25, 1676. He was in command of a foot-company of about eighty men at Medfield, when, on Feb. 21, 1676-7, the town was attacked by a large body of Indians and partially destroyed. There were, besides this company of Capt. Jacob, a detachment of twenty troopers under command of Lieut. Edward Oakes, and the " train-band " of the town, about one hundred in number. These were quartered about the town in the various houses, and there were no scouts about the town to keep watch and ward, and the enemy crept in and about the houses, and just before daylight, at a given signal, fired the detached houses, near which they had placed ambuscades, and when the people and the soldiers quartered there, rushed out, they were shot down. The main guard, stationed near the meeting-house, had a cannon which they fired several times, which alarmed the inhabitants and prob ably frightened the enemy, who fled across the river towards Sherburne, burning the bridge behind them, thus cutting off the slow and clumsy pursuit of the scattered troops. The fullest account of this affair is given by Major Daniel Gookin in his " History of the Christian Indians." He says the Indians burnt about forty houses, near half the town, and killed and wounded about twenty people. Among the killed was Lieut. Henry Adams, the military officer of the town. After the lieutenant s death, his widow Elizabeth had been taken to the house of the minister, the Rev. Mr. Wilson, near the meeting-house, and here a very sad and strange accident occurred ; for Mrs. Adams, who had retired to the chamber, and was lying upon a bed just over the room below, in which Capt. Jacob and some of the officers and guards were gathered, was killed by the accidental discharge of a gun in the hand of Capt. Jacob, just as he was passing out of the house to his quarters, and having his gun "half-bent," i.e. at half-cock, the muzzle pointing upward, the bullet piercing through " the floor and mat through and through the body of the lieutenant s widow." He was with Capt. Johnson in the Narra- ganset campaign, and, on the Captain s death, was appointed to the command of the company. 1 He was afterwards engaged during the winter, with Capt. Wadsworth, in guarding the fron tiers from Milton to the Plymouth Colony bounds, Weymouth, Hingham and Hull being assigned in particular to Capt. Jacob. John, 2d, inherited his Narraganset claim. 1 It is probable that in the " Fort Fight " Lieut. Henry Bowen, if present, took the command after the Captain fell, as was proper, but Capt. Jacob was appointed to fill the place afterward, as were other senior officers, in the other companies. CREDITS UNDER CAPT. JOHN JACOB, OF HINGHAM. 285 Credited under Capt. John Jacob, of Hiiigham. 1 March 24 th 1675-6 Nathaniel Beales 01 09 06 April 24 th 1675 William Williams 00 05 00 James Taylor 01 04 00 June 24 th 1676 Thomas Davis 00 09 05 William Field 00 12 00 Benjamin Bignall 00 09 02 John Battle 00 12 00 Jeremiah Fisher 00 12 00 Benjamin Wight 00 12 00 Ephraim Wilson 00 12 00 John Thurston 00 12 00 Nathaniel Farringtou 00 12 00 Edward Segwell 00 12 00 John Gray 00 12 00 John Cuckow 00 04 02 John Herring 00 05 00 John Richardson 03 07 08 Alexander Mecanny 04 16 00 John Nowell 00 09 02 Humphrey Richards 00 12 00 John Sibly 02 17 04 July 24 th 1676 John Taylor 00 16 09 Ebenezer Inglesby 00 10 02 William Bodkin 00 10 02 August 24 th 1676 Elisha Foster 00 10 02 Anthony Hancock 00 10 02 Edward Blaucher 00 10 02 John Howen 00 10 03 John Plumb 00 10 02 Samuel Paule 00 15 02 David Fawkner 00 10 02 John Wells, Jr. 00 10 02 Henry Bowen 00 15 00 John Jacobs 09 17 00 William Paine 00 10 02 Thomas Hoppin 02 18 02 Gilbert Endicott 00 10 02 Joseph Swady 00 10 02 September 23 d 1676 Isaac Jones 00 10 02 CAPT. JOHN CUTLER AND HIS MEN. Capt. John Cutler was the son of Robert (of Charlestown in 1637, freeman 1638) and Rebecca his wife. John was probably born in England about 1628. He married, first, Anna Wood- mansey, daughter of Robert and Anna. She died August 20, 1683, in her 57th year, and he married, second, Mehitable Hilton, October 29, 1684. She died September 29, 1711, having survived the captain, who died September 12th, 1694, in his 66th year. His children, all by his first wife, were John ; Timothy ; Sarah, born October 20, 1655, married Eleazer Phillips, 1695-6 ; Samuel, born March 6, 1658 ; Hannah, married Daniel Willard, 1683 ; Robert, born November 15, 1663, died in Barbadoes August 30, 1683 ; Rebecca, born November 5, 1666, married Josiah Bennett ; Mary, born November 20, 1669, died 1703. Capt. Cutler was engaged during the war, on various occasions, in conducting supply trains to the garrisons, and at the time of Capf. Wadsworth s destruction at Sudbury, April 21, 1676, nar rowly escaped being cut off with his company returning from Marlborough. He was in command of a company under Capt. Henchman the next month at Hassanamesit. 1 See also credits of March and April, 1676, under Capt. Johnson. 286 KING PHILIP S WAK. Credited under Capt. John Cutler. June 24 1676 Thomas Micheson 01 04 10 Zachariah Feres 00 09 04 Henry Philips 01 04 00 William Green 00 12 00 Thomas White 00 14 00 John Wilson 00 14 00 William Browne 00 15 04 Joseph Pratt 00 15 04 Christopher Goodwin 00 16 02 Daniel Edmunds 02 06 08 Zeckeriah Johnson 00 18 10 John Watson 00 14 00 Isaac Johnson 00 05 02 Josiah Wood 01 07 04 Joseph Frost 00 10 00 John Dows 00 14 00 Samuel Hayward 00 09 04 William Whiting 01 07 04 John Martin 00 09 04 Samuel Blancher 00 12 10 Robert Carter 00 09 04 Timothy Philips 01 14 10 James Nichols 00 08 06 Giles Fifield 00 04 00 John Winslade 00 09 04 John Fosdicke 00 12 10 William Laroby 00 09 04 Samuel Peirce 00 09 04 Jonathan Stimpson 00 02 06 Samuel Cutler 01 04 10 George Woodward 00 07 08 Joshuah als. Josiah Ben Thomas Whitney 00 02 06 jamin 00 12 00 William Goddard 00 09 04 Daniel Baldwin 00 03 04 Samuel Prentice 00 09 04 John Cutler, Leiut. 03 15 00 Joshuah Edmands 00 06 10 Nathaniel Rand 01 03 04 August 24 th 1676 Matthew Griffin 00 15 04 Edward Smith 00 06 10 Samuel Frothingham 00 16 02 John Lee 00 02 06 Nathaniel Douse 01 07 04 Edward Goff 01 13 04 Thomas Rand 01 04 10 Hugh Taylor 00 18 00 George Polly 00 09 04 Isaac Beech 00 09 04 Edward Wilson 00 09 00 David Mead 00 09 04 Josiah Smith 00 12 10 John Dowgin 00 09 04 James Smith 00 18 08 John Whitney 00 02 06 John Smith 00 03 04 Nathaniel Fisk 00 02 06 William Clough 00 14 00 Ephraim Phillips 00 09 04 Nathaniel Frothingham 00 02 06 William Rider 00 10 02 John Call (2 credits) 00 19 00 Daniel Willard 00 14 06 Munning Sawin 00 12 00 Christopher Muschin 00 09 04 Eleazer Beares 00 12 00 Samuel Cooper 00 12 00 Joseph Parker 00 08 00 William Price 00 09 04 John Barrett 00 06 06 September 23 d 1676 July 24 1676 Aaron Cleaveland 00 02 06 John Begello 00 09 00 Thomas Hammond 00 10 02 Isaac Fowl 00 12 00 John Kemball 00 02 06 John Dickson 01 01 04 John Stedman 00 03 09 Robert Robin 00 09 04 David Alexander 00 10 02 Stephen Coolidg 00 02 06 Alexander Wait 00 09 04 John Edes 00 09 08 John Melvin 00 10 02 Phillip Russell 02 06 00 Thomas Fiske 00 10 02 Daniel Warren 00 09 08 Samuel Peirce 00 12 00 John Jones 00 09 04 John Brookes 00 15 06 Nathaniel Kittle 00 11 00 John Walker 00 09 04 Samuel Gibson 00 03 04 Jonathan Smith 00 09 04 FEOM LIEUT. UPHAM TO THE COUNCIL. 287 UEUT. PHINEAS TJPHAM AND HIS COMMAND. Lieut. Phineas Upham was the son of John Upham, who, about the year 1635, settled in Weymouth, having wife Elizabeth and several children. Phineas was born in 1635 or 1636. About 1648 his father removed to Maiden, and there the son grew up ; and there he married, April 14, 1658, Ruth Wood ; and they had children : Phineas, Nathaniel, Ruth, John, Elizabeth and prob ably Richard and Thomas. Lieut. Upham was a man of more than ordinary ability and influence, as the records, and references to his public services in places of trust, prove. At the breaking out of the war he held the rank of Lieutenant in the local com pany. He was in command of men, and in service during the latter part of the summer; and in September, 1675, led a company of thirty-eight men out to Mendon to meet Capt. John Gorham of Plymouth Colony, and the account of their service on that occasion is explained in the following letters : Letter of Lt. Phineas Upham to the Governer and Council. From Mendum, y e 1 st : Octob r : 1675. Honer d Gou r ne r & Counsill. These are to certify your worships that Cap 1 . Gorum with myselfe & our Souldiers of both Company 8 are in good health at pres" through mercy ; And to give your honer an account of our seaverell marches ; first we Came to Mendum one the 25 th day of the weeke at nightt being the 24 th day of September and one the 25 th day we marched from Mendum unto Hassanemisett hoping there to have had an Indian for our guide ; butt the Indians were all gone from thence ; and were thereby dis- apoynted of our expecttation & one the next day we marched unto Packachoug where we found a f eild of good corn and well fenced : which we did think convenient not to destroy : Concluding that for ought we Knew Sum of the neeriest of our Inhabitance would be will ing to save itt ; butt we could not finde any Indians neither the signe of any being there of late and we marched from thence unto Manchoag and Chobanamagungamung where we found sum cornfeilds and sum wigwams, which Corn and wigwams we burnt and destroyed butt (we did not) finde any of our enimies which was a greate discouragement to us, having taken soe much paynes to finde them ; then we Returned and marched to an Indian Plantation called Shockebogue where we Could not finde any Indians butt found a Considerable quantity of Good Corne which we did not destroy butt Reserved itt at the Request of Sum of Mendum who thinke to fetch itt home for there use ; and from thence we Came to Mendum one the 30 th of Sept br : now seeing in all our marches we finde noe Indians verily thinke thatt thay are drawne together into greate bodyes far Remote from those partes : If your honers please to send us one any further Service I hope we shall nott be unwilling butt forwarde to doe our uttermost Indeavours with all desiring that you would be pleased to add unto our number 288 KING PHILIP S WAR. seeing that besides the Garrison men which must be left heere in garrison we have butt 30 men besides my Selfe, Capt. Gorum being now in his march to Mounthope and If we goe further we desir thatt we may have a Surgeon and some other thatt may be acquainted with the woodes where you Sende us the want of w ch hath beene a dis couragement to our men : And as for the town of Mendum I am desired to Commend the desolate condition of y m unto you r honers : Severall of there Inhabitance being removed from them : and those in garrison being butt poore helps in divers respects and in number but 12 men, with theire armes very defecttive. The plantation is very Remotte & therefore soe much the more stands in neede of helpe ; itt is very Likely to be a prosperous place if itt please God to putt an Ishue to thes troubles and therefore it is the more pitty to have itt deserted by there people : who think it must be If they have nott sum assistance they hope : 20 : men well fitted with this one Returned might be sufishent If your honers se Gauss ; and further they desired to acquainte your honers that y e Indians of Hassanamisett which your honers apoynted to set down with them have desertted there one town and come nott to that at Mendum And soe nott havening any more to troublee your honers with I Rest your Hon" To Command PHINEHAS UPHAM, Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 275. Liftenantt. Letter of Capt John Gorum to Gfov 01 " & Councill. Mendum Octob : th : 1 : 1675. Much Hon rd my servis with all due Respeckts humbly presented to yourselfe and the rest of the Counsill hoping of your helths I have made bold to troble you with these few lines to give your honnors an account of our progress in your Jurisdiction : According unto your honers order and detirminatiou I arived at Mendum with fifty men and the next day Lef tennant Upham arived with thirty-eight men and the day following wee joyned our forces together and marched in pesuite to ffind our Ennimy ; but God hath bin pleased to denigh us any op- pertunity tharein ; though with much Labor and travill we have indeav- ored to find them out which Left. Upham hath given you a more particular acount : our Solders being much worne out having bin in the ffeeld this foretene weeks and little hoops of finding the Enimy, we are this day Returning towards our Genrall : but as for my one part I shall be Redy to sarve God and the Country in this just warr soe long as I have life and helth. Not Else to troble you I Rest yours to Sarve in what I am able. Mass. Archives, vol. 67. JOHN GORUM. From Mendon Lieut. Upham marched his company to Brook- field, towards Springfield, where he was ordered by the Court to report to Capt. Wayte, who was expected to command a com pany in the service under Major John Pynchon, and that arrange ment failing, he was assigned to the command of Capt, Jonathan FATALLY WOUNDED. 289 Poole, with whom he joined forces and marched to Hadley be fore October 12th. He was formally placed under command of Capt. Poole in the organization of the army under Major Apple- ton, arid served thus, in the stirring events of the weeks following. November 20th, he was credited as Lieutenant under Capt. Poole, X06. 19. 04. He returned home when the army withdrew from the west ; but joined the forces at Narraganset, probably after the muster at Dedham, December 10th. He was assigned to Capt. Johnson s company, and after that gallant officer s fall, was himself fatally wounded, at the head of the company, inside the fort. He was among the wounded at Rhode Island, January 6, 1675-6. He died at Boston, October, 1676, and October 12, 1676, the court issued the following order: Order of the General Court. October 12, 1676. In answer to the peticon of Ruth Upham, wid- dow & relict of the late Left. Phineas Upham, the Court Judgeth it meet to order, that the bills of charges to chirurgeous, doct & diet, mentioned in sajd peticon, be p d by the Treasurer of the country ; and in consideration of the long and good service hir husband did for the country, & the greate losse the widdow susteynes in his death, being left with seven small children, & not able to carry on their affaires for the support of hirself & family, doe further order the Treasurer to pay unto the sajd widdow tenn pounds in or as money. Items, Treasurer to pay, s d Mr. Chickering bill 2 14 08 Edward Ellis, Chir 2 10 00 Mr. Addington 1 03 05 Dr. Cooke 1 05 00 Mrs. Peirc for diet 4 18 00 To y e Widdow 10 00 00 Secretary Allowance 40 00 00 Col. Records, Vol. V. p. 122. Credited under Lieut. Upham. December 20 th 1675 Robert Skelton 01 01 04 Robert Bardall 02 02 00 John Shaw 00 10 02 June 24 th 1676 John Hall 01 00 00 August 24 th 1676 Thomas Hoppin 00 07 08 I have found that the men who served under him were mostly paid aff under the vouchers of Capt Poole ; and after the fight at Narraganset he was never again able to take command. CAPT. SAMUEL HUNTING. He was the son of John Hunting of Dedham, and was born July 22, 1640. He settled first at Chelmsford and later at Charlestown. Married Hannah Hackburne of Roxbury Dec. 24, 1662. They had ten children born at Charlestown between 1662 290 KING PHILIP S WAK. and 1687, of whom all but three died in childhood. Those who lived were Samuel, born July 15, 1666, married, and settled in Charlestown and had a family ; Mercy, baptized March 13, 1681-2, married Benjamin Frothingham, 1704 ; Hannah, baptized Dec. 3, 1682, married Samuel Frothingham, 1704. Captain Hunting was killed by the accidental discharge of his gun August 19, 1701, aged sixty years. We have seen that there was in the Massachusetts Colony great opposition to the employment of friendly Indians in the war, while Connecticut, constantly making use of them, had been spared the terrible losses which had befallen the others. At last, grown wise by bitter experience, the Massachusetts Council determined to stem the tide of popular opposition, and equip and send forth a company of Christian Indians, to try if the devastations of the enemy along the frontiers could be checked. In pursuance of this order, April 21, 1676, Capt. Samuel Hunting and Lieut. James Richardson drew up and fur nished their company of forty Indians at Charlestown. They were ordered first to march up the Merrimac to near Chelms- ford, and there to build a fort and settle a garrison at the great falls, which was a famous fishing-place ; they were to scout and guard, etc. ; but before they marched, and about mid-day, came the news of the attack of the great body of Indians upon Sud- bury. Captain Hunting with his company marched away to Sudbury and rendered service, as has been related in the chapter relating to the Sudbury fight. The service here rendered did much to abate the hostility against the Christian Indians, and they were thenceforward in constant service in all the expeditions while the war lasted, and Captain Hunting s company was soon made up to eighty men, who were furnished with arms sent over from England. From the time that Captain Hunting s company took the field, the enemy lost heart, evidently fearing them more than the whole armies of English, which they could easily elude, or ambush or mislead. In the summer of 1676 this company took captive or killed about four hundred of the enemy, and did nearly all the effective work against the enemy in the closing operations of the war. The services of Captain Hunting and his company at the eastward and elsewhere have been incidentally related. Credited under Capt. Hunting. Samuel Hunting, Capt. 21 00 00 James Richeson, Lieut. 10 10 00 Nathaniel Dunklin 05 05 00 Sept. 23, 1676 Benjamin Collins 01 08 06 John Devericks 01 08 06 William Browne Andrew Robinson Thomas Frost Jacob Farar Thomas Peach 01 02 03 02 02 08 06 08 00 00 In general, accounts were not kept with the Indians. CAPT. GEORGE CORWIN. 291 LIEUT. EDWARD CREEKE. Lieut. Creeke was of Boston, of the Artillery Co., 1674. Served with Capt. Turner in the west, and led home the remnant of his company after that officer s death. In October, 1676, he was in command of a force of thirty-four men at a garrison in Wells. No credit is found for these, but one of the soldiers in the western campaign secured his credit under Lieut. Creeke, viz. : August 24, 1676 John Gilbert 05 09 08 CAPT. GEORGE CORWIN, OR CTJRWEN. Capt. Corwin came from England with wife Elizabeth (White, widow of John), and settled at Salem in 1638. Their children were : Abigail, b. Aug. 1, 1637 ; John, b. July 25, 1638 ; Jonathan, b. Nov. 14, 1640; Abigail 2d, b. Nov. 30, 1643; Hannah, bapt. Jan. 4, 1646; and Elizabeth, July 2, 1648. This wife Elizabeth died July 15, 1668, and he married, 2d, July 22, 1669, Mrs. Elizabeth Brooks, widow of Robert, of Plymouth, and daughter of Gov. Edward Winslow, and by her had : Penelope, b. Aug. 7, 1670 ; Susannah, b. Oct. 10, 1672 ; George, b. 1674. Capt. Corwin was a deputy from Salem many times, was a man of ability and influence, and was very popular. He was chosen to the command of the troop raised at Salem and Lynn, and was commissioned October 8, 1662. In Philip s war, the only active service which I have found referred to him appears in the Colonial Records, Vol. V. p. 90. At the session of the Court May 5, 1676, Capt. Corwin was presented for the " evil example of his demeanor and carriage " towards Capt. Henchman, under whose command he was serving, with his troop, in the spring of 1677. He was reduced from his command with a severe reprimand, and fined one hundred pounds. The following September he was, upon the petition of his troopers, reinstated in his command ; and in 1679-80 the court remitted his fine. He died in Salem, January 3, 1684-5. Credited under Capt. George Corwin. July 24, 1676 John Dodge 00 10 00 William Dodge 00 10 00 Zechariah Henrick 00 10 00 Sept. 23, 1676. Benjamin Collins 00 11 05 John Putnam 01 08 07 Henry Kenney 00 11 05 Geo. Corwin, Capt. 02 05 00 Capt. EZEKIEL GILMAN of Boston, 1675, served under Capt. Oliver as Sergt. in the Narraganset campaign ; was wounded at the fight; was at Rhode Island January 6th, 1675-6. He was 292 KING PHILIP S WAR. out again under Capt. Turner in the spring, serving as Sergt. In the Settlement he is styled " Capt." Credits under Capt. Giiman. June 24, 1676 Amos Singleterry 00 05 00 Nathaniel Lad 00 05 00 George Brown 00 13 00 John Johnson 00 02 06 Robert Swami 00 11 10 Daniel Lad, Jr. 06 05 00 Capt. Aaron Cooke, of Hadley, was left in command of some of the men taken out of Mosely s, Poole s and Upham s com panies, at Westfield, November, 1675. He married, May 30, 1661, Sarah Westwood, and had a large family. A man of in fluence; Capt. of the militia for thirty-five years. Died in 1716. Credited under Capt. Aaron Cooke. August 24, 1676 John Stedman 01 17 00 John Parneer 01 00 06 Sept. 23, 1676 Thomas Hart 01 02 02 Edward Co well, of Boston, was employed in the war in various ways ; was in command of a small body of horsemen on the day of the Sudbury fight, as we have seen. He furnished supplies of various kinds to the Colony in the war ; but one credit is given under him, viz. : August 24, 1676 John Scant 00 16 00 Some miscellaneous credits follow : August 24, 1676 Benjamin Switzer, under Lieut. (John) Floyd 00 04 02 Ephraim Fowlsham Capt. (Benj.) Gillam 00 19 08 The two following were credited without officer or place assigned : March 24, 1675-6 Elias Peckworth 04 02 00 I Thomas North 02 12 00 XXI. MAJOR RICHARD WALDERNE AND HIS MEN. THE Walderne * family, to which the subject of this chapter, Richard Wald.erne, belonged, is of ancient lineage, as seen in the Pedigree, found by H. G. Soraerby in England, and published by him in the New England Historical and Genealogi cal Register, vol. viii. p. 78. This shows descent from Edward Walderne and Joan his wife, of Alcester, in Warwickshire, through George Walderne and Joan Shallarde, married July 8, 1576, who had William, baptized July 25, 1577, married Catherine Raven at Alcester, November 26, 1600, and had nine sons and two daughters. The seventh son was Richard, baptized January 6, 1615. This Richard f Walderne came to America, it is said, in 1635, " to See the Country. He stayed about two Years and returned to England and there Marryed a Gentlewoman of a very good family (whose parents were very unwilling She Should come away) her names are not remembered nor of w l place." The matter above quoted is from the fragment of a letter from James Jeffrey to Councillor Richard 3 Waldron, the Major s grandson. Major Walderne came to America with his young wife about 1637. After her death he married Anne Scammon, sister of Richard. His children were Paul, 2 who died in Algiers about 1669 (probably on board one of his father s vessels). Timothy, 2 who died while a student in Harvard College. Richard, 2 born 1650. Anna, 2 married Rev. Joseph Gerrish. Elnathan, 2 born July 6, 1659, in Boston, died Dec. 10, 1659. Esther, 2 born Dec. 1, 1660, in Boston ; married (1) Henry Elkins, (2) Abraham Lee, June 21, 1686, (3) Richard Jose, and (4) . She died in the Isle of Jersey. Mary, 2 born Sept. 14, 1663, in Boston, died young. Eleazer, 2 born May 1, 1665. Elizabeth, 2 born Oct. * I have thought beet, in this present chapter, to adopt the spelling of the Major s own signature, which agrees with his English ancestors and was used by his contemporaries. His son Richard changed it in his own signature, and wrote of his father as Waldron, and all historians since have referred to the family by that name. f Rev. A. H. Quint, D.D., the eminent antiquarian, has furnished an account of the Waldron (Walderne) family in America, and that account is here followed. See N. E. Hist, and Gen. Register, vol. ix. p. 55, and Historical Memoranda in " Dover Enquirer," NOB. 104 to 111, April 19 to June 7, 1853; and NOB. 175 to 178, Aug. 6 to Aug. 22, 1857. 294 KING PHILIP S WAR. 8, 1666 ; married John Gerrish, of Dover. Maria, 2 born July 17, 1668 ; died about the age of fourteen. Richard, 2 the son of Major Walderne, changed the surname to Waldron, and the family has since been known as Waldron. He married (1) Hannah Cutt, Feb. 16, 1681, who died Feb. 14, 1682, at the birth of her first child ; (2) Eleanor Vaughan, who died September, 1727. He died Nov. 3, 1730. His children (by his first wife) were Richard, 3 born 1682, who died aged about eleven months ; Richard 3 (2d), born Feb. 21, 1693-4 ; Margaret, 3 born Nov. 16,1695; William, 3 born 1697; Annie, 3 born 1699; Abigail, 3 born 1702; Eleanor, 3 born 1704. It is supposed that Major Walderne was a man of some property when he came to this country, as he purchased a large tract of land at Cocheco (Dover, N.H.), where he settled about 1640, erected saw-mills, established his business, and made his home. He was a man of remarkable enterprise and ability, and by wise investment and diligent use of his opportunities acquired a large property for his time. He established a truck-house for the ac commodation of the Indians and his own gain at Pennacook, in 1668 ; and it was there that an Englishman, Thomas Dickinson, was killed by an Indian who was drunk, and whom the Indians immediately punished with death. An investigation ensued, and Major Walderne was accused of selling or furnishing liquors at his truck-house, which made the Indian drunk, contrary to the laws and the special terms of the treaty. The papers in this case are preserved in the Mass. Archives, vol. 30, pp. 154-161. The liquors were said to be sold by the hand of Paul Walderne, son of the Major, and Peter Coffin. During the investigation, the Major was suspended from his office by his brother magistrates, but upon his own oath as to his entire innocence of complicity, either direct or indirect, in the affair, and upon the evidence, he was acquitted as well as his son, and was restored to his office and power, while Peter Coffin was convicted and fined fifty pounds. He was much in public life, and exerted a wide influence in various ways. He was representative to the General Court for thirteen years, and was Speaker of the House for seven years ; was appointed to be a magistrate for the North Circuit of old Norfolk County, consisting of Portsmouth and Dover, and also of the County of York. Major Walderne seems to have been in full sympathy with the strictest Puritans of Massachusetts Colony, and a sturdy champion of colonial rights and ecclesiastical authority, if we regard his severe treatment of the Quakers within his jurisdiction, as zeal for the church. His wide influence among the people is seen to have been due to general popularity, by his large vote at elections in the times when people dared to put their will, and meant to put their conscience, into their votes. In his extensive trade with the Indians and in constant communication with them, he seemed to MAJOR WALDERNE S COMMISSION. 295 have kept their confidence, and to have had very little trouble with them in the thirty-five years that he had lived near them. There had been provocations doubtless on the part of the English as well as the Indians, and the Major, in common with other magistrates, was obstinate and stupidly severe in the administra tion of English law upon a wild, heathen people, who had no more idea of its meaning than of Sanskrit. The Indians knew the meaning of gratitude as well as vengeance ; they could bide their time and dissemble submission, but they did not forget. Dover was a frontier town, and, several years before the war, houses had been fortified and a stockade set up about the meet ing-house to prevent a surprise. Large numbers of Indians were coming and going among the settlers, were received and enter tained in their houses, were well acquainted with the habits and peculiarities of their home-life and ways of business and worship, and it is probable that there was no other place in the Colony where the relations of settlers and Indians were more free and kindly than in this settlement at Dover. At the same time, here as elsewhere, the English regarded the Indians with ill-concealed contempt as inferior beings, and not really worth conciliating in permanent friendship, but to be tolerated till such time as they could be conveniently driven away. It is probable that in military matters, as in all others, the direction had been in the hands of Major Walderne. The first record I have found relating to this is the following commission from the General Court, Oct. 7, 1674 : Capt. Richard Walderne having had the command of the militia in Yorkshire, by authority from this Court, for the last two yeares past, & hath this summer draune forth the regiment of foote & troope of horse there, exercised them in military discipline, this Court doth heereby appoint him, the said Richard Walderne, to be the sarjant majo r of the forces in Yorkshire, and doe order, that he have commission as other majo r s have for authorizing him to that service. Col. Rec., vol. v. p. 22. When the alarm of the attack upon Swansea reached the people, measures were at once taken to secure these frontier towns, and the colonial authorities took steps to assist the more exposed and weaker settlements. The following letter will show the Council alert also to secure active cooperation of forces all along the lines : ffor Maj r Rich d Waldern. Having Acquainted the Council what I advised you the fifteenth Inst. I am commanded by them to order you forthwith w th 50 or 60 souldiers under your owne or Mr. Plaisteds or some other sufficient conduct you march to Pennicooke supposed to be y 6 great Randevous of y e enemy, where you may expect to meet Capt. Mosely, who is ordered thither and hath sufficient commission, to pursue kill & destroy 296 KING PHILIP S WAR. them w ch also you must attend as y r work unless such as shall willingly deliver up their armes & themselves or sufficient hostages to secure their peaceable behaviour you had need to take along with you a Chi- rurgeon & make all possible expedition. A great part of our forces are at present at Hadley. DANIEL DENISON, Maj r Gen 1 . Boston, August 17, 1675. By order of y e Council. Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 241. An account of the expedition referred to in the letter, has been given in a former chapter relating to Capt. Mosely. The Penna- cooks and their allied families took no part in the war, but they did not, and perhaps could not, prevent the hostile or " strange " Indians from passing from tribe to tribe ; and occasionally small war parties, going back and forth from the East to the West, found entertainment in these tribes, but were not joined by them in their hostile movements, though some of their young men may have been enticed to join the hostiles on occasions. In the beginning, the Indians, bent mostly upon plunder, seem to have broken up into small parties, which could easily find out and strike exposed points here and there, and, when necessary for some large enterprise, could swiftly concentrate their forces at any given time and place. The first depredations of these Indians upon these Northeastern frontiers, began in September, 1675, at Oyster River (now Dur ham, N.H.) ; they burnt two houses of " the Cheslies," killed two men in a canoe upon the river, captured an old Irishman and a 3 7 oung man, both of whom escaped in a few weeks by the help of a friendly Indian. Three Indians, viz., John Sampson, Crom- wel and John Linde, waylaid Goodman Robinson and his son, of Exeter, on their way to Hampton, and killed the father, the young man escaping to Hampton. These same Indians captured Charles Randlet, of Exeter, who soon after escaped. The house of Richard Tozer at Salmon Falls, wherein were fifteen women and children, was attacked by two Indians, " Andrew " and " Hope-Hood," but was valiantly defended by a young woman, who held fast the door till all the others escaped, and till it was hewn in pieces by the Indians, who then entering, struck her down, leaving her for dead, while they followed the others to the next house, which, being better fortified, the Indians did not attack. Two children were captured who were of this company, and could not keep up with the others ; one of three years was killed, the other of seven was carried into captivity, but afterwards was returned. The brave girl who defended the house revived after the Indians left her, and escaped to her friends and was restored to perfect health ; and it is to be regretted that Mr. Hubbard, who relates this, did not record the name of the heroine, as he doubtless could have easily done. WAR AT THE EASTWARD. 297 Small parties prowled in the woods in every direction, burning and shooting. Six more houses were burned at Oyster River, and William Roberts and his son-in-law were killed. Under these provocations the English were goaded almost to despera tion, and yet, if they drew out in force to pursue, the Indians easily escaped to the woods and could not be overtaken. Several parties of volunteers went out from the garrisons in pursuit, but without avail, except that one party discovered five Indians, three gathering corn in a field, while two were building a fire to roast it. Two of the English crept up to these latter, and sud denly rushing to close quarters killed them both, knocking them on the head with the butts of their muskets. The rest escaped. Capt. John Wincoll, who lived at Berwick, seems to have been in active service under Major Walderne, and was absent upon some service when his house and barn, with several of his neighbors buildings, were burned by the Indians. It is possible that he was with Major Walderne at the Eastward when this took place. The following letter takes us further to the Eastward, and gives a glimpse of what was going on there, while towns upon the Connecticut were battling for life with the allies of Philip. Douer 25 th September 1675 Much Hon rd My Absence from home (being this Week at Eastw rd ) hath Ocation d yo r hearing nothing from mee Soe long but being Just now returned this evening thought it my Duty w th all expedition to giue Ace" of the state of y c Place Since I sent away Cap Dauis w th about 50 men at y c enemies ffirst Assault of those places (haueing ffurther Information of their killing & Burning) According to yo r direction raised a p ty of Souldiers out of Douer and Portsmo th & w 01 an Addition of Some from Kittery I did my selfe Aduance eastw d for y e ffurther Succour of those places but before I came Soe ffarr as Sawco Capt Dauis being gone to Falm th where the first damage was done by the enemy I had Aduice of y e enemies Marching Westward ffalling upon Scarbrough & Sawco killing and burning on Saturday and Sabbath day last at Scarbrough they killed an old man and Woman & burnt their house & at M r Fox- wells two young men were killed being att y c barn about y r Cattle The enemy y n Aduanced tow d9 Sawco riuer w ch is nott aboue 4 miles distant from y Part of Scarbrough & there fell to burning of houses y e People before haueing Intelligence ffrom an Indian called Scossaway of y e time w n they Would come deserted their houses most of y m repairing to Maj r Pendletons but M r Bonighten & some other ffamilies to Maj r Phillips on Saturday Morning y e Indians rifled and burnt Seuerall houses ou y e north Side y e riuer & among w ch M r Bonightens was one he being the night before fled to Maj r Phillips while said houses were burning a pty of y m Judged about 36 Ind 08 came ouer y e riuer in english canooes & w n come Ashore cutt holes in y m and turned y" 1 Adrift but all this time finding noe men they went to Maj r Phillips Saw mill & 1" Set it goeing then on fire & burnt it & afterwards did y e like to his corn mill it being Judged to be their design thereby to draw y m out of y e house, 298 KING PHILIP S WAK. and soe to Surprise both y m & itt but Maj r Phillips being fforwarned of their coming made Some Small defense about his house haueing w th him of his own ffamilies & neighbors to y e number of 15 men besides women & Children in all about 50 the bushes being thick within shott of his house could not att ffirst See an Ind n but one of y e men Per- ceiueing a Stirring Among y e ffearnes Maj r Phillips looked out of his Chamber Window y l Way and ffrom y nce was Imediately shott att and slightly Wounded in y e should 1 " (2 more were alsoe Wounded Afterwar d y* being all the harm done there) Afterw ds y e Shott came thick w ch was Accordingly Answered ffrom within Butt noe Indians as yet apeared but onely Creeping deckt with ffearns and boughs till some time after they gott a p r of old truck wheels and ffitted y m up w th boards and Slabs ffor a barricadoe to Safe guard y e Driuers thereby Endeavouring to burn y e house haueing prepared combustible matter as birch rinds pitchwood Turpentine and powd r ffor y l end but they in y e house pceiueing their Intention Plyed their shott against itt and ffound Afterw d8 their shott went through A little before they Came at y e house there was a little wett ground into w ch y e Wheels Sunk and y obstructed their driueing it fforw d they Endeauouring to gett it out of y e dirt again by turning a little on one Side thereby layeing y m selues open to y m in y e house w ch oportunity they improued & made y m quitt their work and ffly but Continued fireing at y e house all night till Sabbath day morning about 9 a clock and then they saw y e Indians at a distance March away they Judged between 20 & 30 & some of y m w th 2 guns but before they went they set fire on a little out house & in itt burnt seuerall hogs Since w** Maj r Phillips is remoued down to Winter harbour to Maj r Pendletons where I found him After this y e Same or another Party of Indians went to Scarbrough to a Place called Dunstan where L Alger being abroad w th 6 men more well arm d being about their Ocations mett 14 Ind ns compleat in Armes in 2 ranks He retreating a little towar d8 his house y e Ind n " Aduanced and ffollowed whereupon he faced y m y e 1 st rank of y e Ind n " fired & orderly fell in y e rear of y e others Lt Alger w th his 6 men fired & Primed they Struck some of y m whereupon they Imediately ffled they being at a Considerable Distance none of y m Rec d any harm but notw th standing all this neither my Selfe nor Cap Dauis nor any pty I sent out tho I had y" in those pts 120 souldiers could euer see an Ind an Therefore Considering y e Weaknesse I left our pts in nearer homew d by takeing soe many thence & the little hopes wee had of meeting w tu y e enemy who As soon as euer they dis- couered a pty of Souldiers in one place fled to another & by Reason of y e Vast Inconueniences Attending a March in y 1 Country ocationed by many riuers Marshes &c. I thought it most prudente to Contract y e people into as small a Compasse as may be in those towns & there make some fortifications to defend y m selves haueing left about 60 Souldiers in garrison at Sawco Scarbrough and Falm th ffor y e defence of those places & ffor their help in gathering their corn & Secureing their prouitions bringing y e Remaining forces back w th mee to their seuerall towns again haueing likewise ordered Wells York & Kittery to garrison y m selues for y r own defence y e Distractions of those places by Reason of psons being fforced to fforsake y r Plantations & leaue their Corn & Cattle to y e enemy doth portend Ineuitable want &c to ensue unlesse god by his extraordinary prouidence doe preuent their case PENXACOOKS AND PEQUAKETS. 299 being Considered beg yo r Thoughts & direction aboutt it w ch w n Rec d shall be readily Attended by Hon rd s r yo r Humble Seru" RICHARD WALDERNE Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 26-7. The above letter of Major Walderne sufficiently explains the situation of affairs at the Eastward. The entire population with drew into their fortified houses, which were garrisoned as well as possible with the inhabitants of the towns, Major Walderne hold ing a small reserve force at Portsmouth and Dover to assist whenever one settlement was more threatened than another. The great tribes which confronted the Eastward settlements and had the controlling influence in -the war in these parts were the Ammoscoggins, who lived upon what is now called the Andros- coggin River ; the Pequakets, whose chief rendezvous was at the head waters of the Saco in the present town of Fryeburg ; the Ossipees, near the lake of that name ; the Pennacooks, who held a large tract of country in the vicinity of Concord, N.H. These larger tribes had gathered the remnants of several once powerful tribes which had held the lands along the coast from Kennebec to the Piscataqua, but which had been almost annihilated by the inter nal wars which raged after the overthrow of the great " Bashaba," who had lived on the Penobscot, and had held all these eastern tribes in subjection. In the struggle for supremacy which suc ceeded, a great part of the fighting men in all the tribes were destroyed. This was at its height when Sir Richard Hawkins visited the coast in 1615. A great plague followed this war, which nearly depopulated the whole region along the shores before the Pilgrims came to Plymouth in 1620. The Ammos coggins and Pequakets were hostile to the English, and it was their depredations, assisted by the restless tribes on the Kennebec and beyond, that so troubled this eastern frontier in the war of 1675-7. The Pennacooks had always been peaceful towards the English since the first settlement. Passaconoway was their chief at the earliest mention we have of them, and was still alive and active for the welfare of his tribe in 1663, though at great age, for it was probably about this time that Major Gookin saw him (as he writes in 1677) " alive at Pawtucket when he was about a hun dred and twenty years old." He seems to have been a chief of remarkable ability and wisdom, and had some sort of dominion over many tribes, and there is some evidence that he bore the sway of a " Bashaba," or Great Sagamore. He was reputed by the Indians to be a great " Powow " and to possess supernatural powers, and was held to be a " sorcerer " by the English, and doubtless had some arts of the juggler by which he gained this renown. He had several sons and daughters, one of whom married Win- 300 KING PHILIP S nepurkitt, sachem of Saugus, whom the English called George Rumneymarsh, upon the story of whose marriage, found in Mor ton s " New Canaan," the poet Whittier based the legend of his poem, "The Bridal of Pennacook." There is evidence that another of his daughters married "Numphow," ruler of the Wamesits and father of " Sam 11 Numphow." A petition to the General Court, October 10, 1665, shows the names of those who petitioned several years before for permission " to redeeme our pore brother and cuntryman" "out of prison and bondage, whose Name is Nanamocomuck the eldest son of Passaconewa." He is said to have gone to the Ammoscoggins soon after, and it is probable that he died there. The celebrated Kankamagus was, it is supposed, his son, and was sachem of the Pennacooks after Wannalancet retired ; he will be mentioned later on. The English called him John Hogkins. It is said that near the close of his life Passaconaway called his people together and gave them his farewell charge, recount ing his own early struggles against the English, which had proved in vain, and, showing the steady increase of the white people everywhere in spite of all opposition, he urged upon them their only safe policy, peaceful submission to and friendship with the English. Upon Wannalancet s succession to his father s title and station, he kept faith with the English as his father had done and advised, and notwithstanding the many wrongs and provocations received by his people, and the urgent appeals of hostile tribes, he remained true, and was held in high esteem by the authorities of the colony. It is probable, however, that most of the power of his father over other tribes fell away from him, for he seems to have had little influence with the Ammoscoggins or Pequakets when war was once begun. When he saw that it was to become a general war, and foresaw that, remaining in the vicinity of the English settlements, his people could hardly fail to be drawn into some active participa tion in it, either for or against the English, he prudently with drew to safe retreats whenever the hostile forces approached his country ; and he displayed not only prudence, but, in the case when Capt. Mosely marched to Pennacook and burnt his village and destroyed the property and stored food of his people, great patience and power ; for he restrained his warriors, who pressed him earnestly for permission to ambush and cut off Mosely s company, which they were in capacity, both of numbers and opportunity, to do. To the friendly intercourse which Dover kept up with Wan nalancet was due, probably in some measure, its immunity from repeated assults. The Wamesits, living at what is now Lowell, formerly Chelmsford, were under the supervision of Lieut. Rich ardson of that town, and were a quiet, reputable " praying SQUANDO OF SACO. 301 village " under the immediate rule of " Numphow," who, as has been intimated, was probably the brother-in-law of Wannalancet. These Indians suffered a great outrage at the hands of some English Indian-haters, who upon the burning of a barn of Lieut. Richardson at Chelmsford by some skulking hostile Indians, im mediately and without authority assaulted these helpless Wame- sits, wounding five women and children, and killing outright a lad, wounding his mother, daughter of Sagamore John and widow of another sagamore, " Tohatoonee," a tried friend of the English. Numphow, with his praying village, fled to Pennacook to Wanna lancet, and wrote to Lieut. Henchman, commanding at Chelmsford garrison, a letter explaining their flight. It was by such outrages as these that those Indians who inclined to peace were alienated, and those already inclined to war embittered, and many of the young men of the Wamesits undoubtedly joined the hostile Indians, and passed to the East ward to swell the ranks and increase the efficiency of those bands of Ammoscoggins and Pequakets, who, with the "strange Indians " from the Nipmucks and western tribes, were carrying destruction to the Eastward settlements. The Indians were said to be led in general by " Squando," sagamore of Saco, formerly a great friend of the English, but, outraged by the treatment of his wife and child by some English sailors, became filled with vengeful hatred towards all the English. These sailors, it is said, seeking to test the common report that Indian children could swim naturally, like the young of beasts, maliciously upset the canoe containing the woman and child; the child sank in the river, but the mother diving to the bottom saved it, which, how ever, soon after dying, its death was imputed to this treatment. Squando was said to be a great powow or wizard, and was probably the most influential chief from the Penobscot to the Piscataqua. It was not Philip s, but his own war that he was fighting against these eastern settlements. Major Walderne s letter and Gen. Denison s appeals seem to have moved the United Commissioners to the following action : Boston Octob: 1 st 1675 The Commissioners understanding that the Inhabitants of Pasca- taque, and so Eastward, are under great Distress, by Reason of the Rage of the Common Enemy, Doe commend it to the honourable Gov ernor and Councill of the Mattachusets, that some present Releife may be sent unto them according to the present Exigent ; the charges whereof shall be allowed in the general Account of the Colouyes. THOMAS DANFORTH, Presid . In the name and by the order of the Commissioners. As the people gathered more and more into the garrisons, the Indians gathered into larger bodies, with the evident design to reduce these garrisons one by one, while they warily watched to 302 KING PHILIP S WAR. cut off all stragglers who attempted to pass from one to another. October 7th was observed as a day of public humiliation, and on that day three men were killed near Newichewannock, and soon after a garrison was assaulted and an old man named Beard was killed just outside the house, and other houses were burnt. On October 16th a large body of Indians, said to be a hundred, gathered towards the settlement of Salmon Falls, and surprising Richard Tozer at his house half a mile from the garrison, killed him and captured his son. Lieut. Roger Plaisted, who was in command at the garrison, hearing the guns of this attack, imme diately sent seven men to find out the cause, when they were ambushed, and two or three were killed, and the others barely escaped back to their garrison. Lieut. Plaisted at once despatched a messenger with the following letter to Major Walderne, which Mr. Hubbard, believing it to have been " the last Time that ever that good and useful Man set Pen to Paper," inserted in his history, and probably obtained the letter for that purpose from Major Walderne. Salmon Falls October 16, 1675. Mr. Richard Waldern and Lieut. Coffin, These are to inform you, that just now the Indians are engaging us with at least one hundred Men, and have slain four of our men already, Richard Tozer, James Barney, Isaack Bottes, and Tozer s son and burnt Benoni Hodsden s House ; Sir, if ever you have any love for us, and the Country, now shew yourself with Men to help us, or else we are all in great Danger to be slain, unless our God wonderfully appear for our Deliverance. They that cannot fight, let them pray ; Nought else, but I rest, Yours to serve you Signed by ROGER PLAISTED, GEOKGE BROUGHTON. Major Walderne was in no condition now to weaken his own garrisons, and had not the valor of Lieut. Plaisted outrun his discretion, his garrison as well as himself and family would have been safe in their defence ; but venturing out with an ox-team guarded by twenty men, to bring in their dead for burial, they fell into an ambush after they had recovered the body of Tozer, and had returned to the swamp near the garrison where the others lay dead. It was the old story, a total surprise, a brave but vain defence, a sullen retreat, and Lieut. Plaisted with his sons, bravely covering the retreat, was surrounded and overwhelmed, but with proud defiance choosing death rather than capture, was at last overpowered by numbers and slain. His eldest son was also killed in this retreat, and another younger son wounded so that he died within a few weeks. The desperate fighting of the Plais- teds probably cost the Indians quite dearly, as they did not appear the next day when Capt. Charles Frost came up from his garri son at Sturgeon Creek (now Eliot, Me.) and buried the dead. Within a few weeks, however, they returned and began depreda- OPERATIONS IN YORK COUNTY. 303 tions in the same places, and ventured as far as Sturgeon Creek, where Capt. Frost had relaxed his vigilance and was working on his farm near his house, in which it is probable his boys were set to watch. The Indians crept up and fired a volley at him before he was aware of their presence ; but he escaped unharmed to his own house, where he began to issue orders in a loud voice as though he had a large company of soldiers, which so frightened the Indians that they passed on and left him unmolested, though his entire force was but three boys, possibly his sons. The Indians then passed down on the Kittery side of the river, killed one man and burnt his house, " just over against Portsmouth ; " but when a small cannon was fired thence and the shot fell not far from them, they were so frightened thereat that they fled, leaving much of their plunder. They were pursued by the English at this time and tracked far into the woods by means of a light snow, but finally escaped into a swamp. This latter service was prob ably under the direction of Major Walderne, although we have no record of its details. For some time after this they continued to harass the settlements, but near the end of November, when it is said that they had killed or captured one hundred and fifty people from the Kennebec to the Piscataqua, they withdrew to their winter quarters, mostly at Ossipee and Pequaket. Gen. Denison designed, and had given orders to the officers in those parts to draw out all available men in their command to pursue the enemy to their homes and there attack and destroy them. This design fell through on account of the early and severe set ting in of winter and the lack of proper snow-shoes in sufficient numbers. But the fierceness of the season, and the unusual num bers huddled together, with the probable neglect to secure their usual supply of food from harvests, hunting and fishing, so pinched them by famine, that they were forced to attempt a reconciliation, and came to Major Walderne and expressed sorrow for all the evil that had been done, and with him concluded a treaty 1 of peace, early in January, which remained unbroken until August, 1676. Before June, 1676, the southern Indians, scattered and pursued from their tribes and homes, and fearing extermination, had hidden themselves amongst these Eastern Indians, and hoped to escape thus the vengeance of the English. In the mean time the Eastern tribes themselves, through the mediation of Wannalancet and Major Walderne, were trying in various ways to atone for past crimes. June 3, 1676, Wannalancet came in with several others of his sachems and brought some English captives, and also the Indians who had been engaged in the killing of Thomas Kembal of Bradford, a month before, and the capture of his family. This Indian was called " Symon " in the petition of Kembal s widow for redress, August 1, 1676. Two others were taken and delivered up at this time, " Andrew " who was implicated 1 See Council Minutes. Maes. Archives, vol. 68, p. 122. 304 KING PHILIP S WAR. with Symon, and Peter, engaged in another crime ; these were delivered by Wannalancet and his chiefs, and the captives, among them Kembal s family, were offered as a token of their repentance and as an atonement for their crime. But our magistrates, a little doubtful that the price was sufficient, threw these three Indians into prison at Dover for the time, from which they soon escaped, and going to the Eastward joined the Kennebec and Ammoscoggins in the renewed hostilities later on. The following is the treaty of July 3d, 1676 : Pascataqua River, Cochecho 3: July [1676]- At a meeting of y e Committee appointed by y e Hono rd Gen 1 Court for to treat y e Indians of the Eastern Parts in order for y e procuring an Hon ble Peace with them, Wee w th y e mutuall consent of y e Sagamores Underwritten in behalfe of themselves & the Men Indians belonging to them being about 300 in Number, have agreed as followeth : l ly That hence forwards none of y e said Indians shall offer any Violence to y e persons of any English, nor doe any Damage to theyr Estates in any kind whatsoever. And if any Indian or Indians shall offend herein they shall bring or cause to bee brought y e offender to some English authority, there to be prosecuted by y e English Lawes according to y e Nature of y e Offence. 2 ly That none of said Indians shall entertain at any Time any of our Enemies, but shall give psent notice to y e Comittee when any come among them, Ingaging to goe forth w th y e English against them (if desired) in order to y e seizing of them. And if any of s d Indians shall themselves at any time bring such o r Enemies unto us, they shall for their Reward have 3, for each they shall so bring in. 3 Iy The Indians performing on theyr part, as is before expressed, wee y e Committee doe ingage in y e behalfe of y e English not to offer any Violence to any of their persons or estates, and if any injury be offered to said Indians by any English, they complaini ng to Authority, y e offender shall be prosecuted by English Lawes according to y e nature of y e offence. In witnes to each & all y e pmises we have mutually shaken hands and subscribed o r Names. The mark -j- WANNALANSET l Sagam r ( Richard Walderu The mark -f- SAMPSON ABOQUACEMOKA Committee < Nic: Shapleigh The mark -(- Mr. W M Sagamore ( Tho: Daniel The mark SQUANDO, Sagamore The mark -f- DONY The mark -f- SEROGUMBA SAM LL NUMPHOW The mark -{- WAROCKOMEE Mass. Arch., vol. 30, p. 206. It is not known how much influence the captive Indians, who 1 Each of these made his own mark before his name, which waa written by a clerk. The orig inal paper is preserved in Mass. Archives, vol. 30. Of the Indians here signing, except Wanna- lanset and Squando, not much is known. Sampson is supposed to have been from the East as far as Kennebec. Mr. W m Sagamore was probably a teacher of the " Praying Indians." Dony was of the Ammoscoggins ; Seroguniba perhaps of the Ossipees, and Warockomee of the Pequakets, though the assignment of these two last is scarcely more than a guess. Sam 11 Numphow was a ruler of the Watnesits, a Christian Indian. THE " CONTRIVEMENT " AT DOVER. 305 escaped from Dover, exercised on the Kennebec Indians in the renewal of hostilities, but it is certain that " Simon " was at the head of those who struck the first blow at Casco (now Portland, Me.), in which attack the Brackets and others to the number of thirty-four were killed or captured. And this party immediately after joined those who had surprised Arrowsick and the settle ments adjoining ; and subsequent events showed that both parties were acting in conjunction. These hostilities were renewed August llth, 1676, a little more than a month after the treaty at Cocheco, which had included all the tribes as far as the Kennebec. None of the tribes whose representatives signed that treaty were implicated in these attacks upon Casco and Arrowsick, and therefore considered themselves upon a peace footing ; so that, when at the beginning of Septem ber some four hundred of these, the men of the tribes, came in to Major Walderne s at Dover, under the leadership of Wannalancet, it was, perhaps, to prove themselves not engaged in the hostilities at the eastward, since they were present now with the Penna- cooks and the others who had kept the peace since the winter before. It was known, however, to the General Court that many of the Indians of the south and west who had been engaged with Philip formerly had now found a retreat with these peaceful tribes. It is not probable that Wannalancet and his chiefs under stood the treaty to impose upon them the duty of investigating the previous career of those Indians who might wish to join them selves to his tribe, nor to have considered themselves responsible for hostile acts done at Narraganset or on the Connecticut River. But the authorities determined upon the immediate suppression of these Eastern Indians, and sent Capts. Sill and Hathorne, as related in a previous chapter, with two companies and full com mission to " kill and destroy " all hostile Indians wherever found. These companies, as above related, came to Dover in September, and there found the great gathering of Indians at Major Wal derne s house. I have not found anywhere any attempt at an explanation of the presence of so many Indians at Dover, other than that which has been intimated above. It was known to all the Indians that the English had made overtures to the Mohawks to make war upon the Eastern and other hostile Indians. The Mohawks were regarded by all the Indians of the New England colonies with a dread which was almost insane ; there seems to have been no thought of resistance to these dreaded foes. Many tribes and remnants of tribes began to sue for terms of peace ; and a general proclamation was issued about this time in answer : That treacherous Persons who began the War and those that have been barbourously bloody must not expect to have their lives spared ; but others that have been drawn into the War, and acting only as Souldiers, submitting to be without Arms, and to live quietly and peaceably for the Future, shall have their Lives spared. 306 KING PHILIP S WAR. A contemporary writer of a pamphlet (written in Boston and published in London, 1676), who signs himself " R. H. " (perhaps Richard Hutchinson), and gives a " True Account of the most con siderable occurrences " in the war, from May 5th to August 4th, 1676, publishes the above decree of the Council, and evidently confounds the treaty of July 3d with the affair of September 7th ; as he says, that " upon the 10th day of July there were about 300 Indians at the Eastward, that surrendered themselves to the Eng lish and their sachems with them." He mentions Wannalancet and Squando, and says the dread of the Mohawks drove them in. He says nothing of a "sham-fight," or of a capture. Mr. Hub- bard is silent as to the "sham-fight; " but says that the Indians, " hoping to shrowd themselves under the Wings of some honester Indians about Quechecho, under Pretence of a Declaration sent out by the Governour and Council of the Massachusetts in July last ; " and in this mention relates that our forces under Capts. Hathorne and Sill, with the help of Major Walderne and Capt. Frost, and others residing in those parts " being then in Readi ness," separated the vile and wicked from the rest and sent them down to the Governour at Boston. And in the other mention, in the account of the war with these Eastern Indians, he says that these officers mentioned above mutually agree to seize upon all those Indians that were gathered " about Major Waldern s Dwelling in Quechecho," and that " the contrivement suc ceeded." Lacking proof contrary, it would seem that the Indians were gathered, through the influence of Major Walderne and Wanna lancet, to accept the terms of the General Court s proclamation of amnesty. The forcible capture of four hundred Indians even by the stratagem of a sham-fight seems highly improbable ; and it is far likelier that the surrender was full and entirely peaceful, while the separation of the bad from the good was made after all were quietly surrounded by the English, possibly under the pre tence of a " training." Mr. Belknap, the eminent historian of New Hampshire, many years minister at Dover, gives some detail of the sham-fight, and says that Major Walderne planned tin s method to secure the " bad " Indians without bloodshed. The Indians were set on one side the field and the English on the other, and after considerable manoeuvring, the Indians were in duced to fire the first volley, after which the four companies of Walderne, Sill, Hathorne, Frost, and probably Capt. Hunting s company of friendly Indians, surrounded and disarmed them. Whatever the method, it is certain that the Indians captured on September 6th, to the number of some two hundred, were sent down to Boston in vessels. September 10th a letter was sent by Major Walderne, Nicholas Shapleigh and Thomas Daniel, containing some explanations in regard to the prisoners and the charges against certain of them. The following is the letter: THE CAPTIVE INDIANS. 307 Dover, 10 th Septemb r 1676 Much Hon d The Ind ns being now on board & Comeing towards you Wee y have been Soe far Improv d about y m Thought it Convenient to Inform how ffar they have kept the Pease made with us & who of those are Concerned therein viz 1 Penicooks Wouolausets Waymesits & Piscataq Ind us there being not any belonging further Eastw d come in nor any other of those belonging to y e South Side of Mirimack ever Included in our Pease ; those of y m y had made y e Pease comeing in to Comply w 01 y the others to get Shelter under y m but y 1 they should be all treated alike as here they were wee humbly Conceived no Reason wee not being able to Charge those that had made y e Pease w tu any breach of Articles Save only y 1 of entertaining our Southern Enemies but by y meanes wee came to Surprise Soe many of y m There are Several of Piscataq Ind ns here who before y e Pease had been very Active Against us but since have lived quietly & Attended Order but yo r Pleasures being to have all sent down to determine their Case at Boston, hath been Attended keeping here about 10 young men of y m to Serve in y e Army with their families & Some old men and theirs with Wonolansets Relations. Yesterday came in 2 Squawes informing y 1 one eyed Jn & Jethro were designing y e Surprizing of Canonicus & bringing in desire- ing Some of our old Men to come to Advise with him about it. I forthwith sent out there to further y e design. Wee have information from Jewels Island y the former newes is not Soe bad being not above 10 in all killed and wounded being unexpectedly surprised If y r be Any obstruction in y e ffurther Prosecution of y e enemy now by y e Army, our People will quickly desert their Country, Shall Add no more at P r sent but Remain in much Hon r Yo r Humble Serv nts RICHARD WALDERN NIC: SHAPLEIGH Mass. Archives, vol. 30, p. 218. THO: DANIEL This letter shows that orders had come from the Council for all the Indians taken to be sent to Boston. There is no doubt that very many of those sent down considered themselves, and were considered by the above committee, as having accepted and fulfilled the terms of peace agreed upon in the treaty with Major Walderne the winter before. The Pennacooks and the Wamesits were the only tribes mentioned as included in the treaty, south of the Merrimac. It is evident that some of the " Praying " Indians were sent down also, as we find Mr. Eliot and Major Gookin at once advocating their cause and the claims of those who had accepted the terms of the treaty and supposed it covered and condoned past offences. A good view of the condition of affairs at this Eastern part, where the war was now being waged, is gained from this letter from the chief citizens of " Northfolk and Yorkshire " Counties. 308 KING PHILIP S WAR. Portsm : 19: 8 br : 1676 Much Hon rd Being upon occasion of y e Alarms lately rec d fro y e Enemy mett togeth r at Portsm thought meet to give yo r Hon rs our sense of Matt in y 8 p of y e Country in y e best Mann r y upon y e place in y e p r sent Hurry we are able to get. How things are now at Wells & York wee know not, but p r sume yo r selves will be informed ere y 8 comes to yo r hand p ye Post sent fro: y e Comand r in cheefe w ch (as wee understand) went thro, y 9 Towne y 8 Morning. Only thus m 011 we have learnt y y e Enemy is Numerous & about those p t3 , having carried all clear before him so far as Wells. That hee is pceeding towards us & so on toward yo r Selves y e Enemy intimates & y 6 thing itself speaks. What is meet to be now don is w th yo r selves to say rather than for us to suggest, how ever being so deeply and nextly concerned humbly crave leave to offer to Consider whether y e securing of what is left bee not o r next Work rather than -y e Attempting to regain what is lost unless there were strength enough to doe both. It seemes little available to endeavor ought in y e More Eastern places y are already conquered unless there bee several Garrisons made & kept with provision & Amunition & what may be suitable for a Recruit upon all Occasions, w ch to do (at least y s Winter) cannot say y y e profit will make amends for y e charge. Sure wee are y o r selves (y 1 is y e County of Northfolk with Dover & Portsm ) are so far from being capeable of Spareing any fforces for y 1 Expedi tion y 1 we find o r selves so thinned and weakened by those y are out already y there is nothing but y e singular Providence of God hath pre vented our being utterly run down. The Enemy observes o r motions & knows o r strength (weaknes rather) bett y n wee are willing hee should & pbably had been with us ere this had not y e Highest Power overruled him. And that Haver-hill, Extt r , &c. are in like P r dicam w th Dover, &c. seems apparent, & hence as uucapeable of spareing Men. In true [sic] there is an Army out in Yorkshire w ch will doubtle 8 doe what may be done, yet there is room enough for y e Enemy to slipp by them unobserved & if so what a Condition we are in is evident. Our own men are not enough to maintain o r own places if any Assault be made & yet many of o" are now on the other side of the Pascataq r River. Wee expect an Onsett in one place or other every day, & can expect no Reliefe fro those that are so far fro home. If it should bee thought meet y 1 all y e Men y are come to us & other parts of y s Juris diction from y e deserted & conquered Eastern Country should be ordered to y e Places y are left on theyr own side of y e River, y so o" may be recalled to theyr severall towns, it might possibly bee not una vailable to ye Ends ; Especially if w th all some Indians might be ordered to these parts to bee upon a perpetuall scout fro place to place. We design not a lessening or discotiragm of y c Army who rather need strengthening & Incouragm , for we verily think y if by y c Good Hand of Providence y e Army had not been there all y e Parts on y e other side of y e River had been possest by the Enemy & perhaps o r selves too ere y s Time. But what we aim at is that o r selves also may be put into Capacity to defend o r selves. Wee are apt to fear we have been too bold with your Honors, but wee are sure our Intentions are good, & o r Condition very bud except y e Lord of Hosts appear for us speedily, & wee would be found in y e Use of Meanes, commending o r case to him REPORT FROM THE EASTWARD TOWNS. 309 y is able to protect us and direct yo r selves in order thereunto, & remain M ch Hon d Yo r Humble Serv* ROB T PIKE, RICHARD WALDERNE, RICHARD MARTYN, JOHN CDTT, W M VAUGHAN, THO: DANIEL. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 71. A reference in Major Gookin s history of the "Praying Indians " proves the intimation in the following letter that a sec ond company of Indians was sent down, including those who came in after the army had passed to the Eastward, and also that Major Walderne himself went to Boston to assist in the " dis posal," and sold some of them ; and probably Wannalancet and his men, and the Wamesits, went with the Major, by the require ment of the General Court. Major Gookin complains that some of his most trusted praying Indians, and especially Sam Num- phow, with difficulty cleared themselves from the accusations of English who had been captives and swore against them, when, he says, it is not easy to identify Indians under even the most favor able conditions. Cochecha, 2. 9 b8r 1676 Maj r Gookin, Hon rd Sr. I rec d yo of 25 th 8 ber concerning Some Ind ns w ch you Say it is Alledged I promised life & liberty to ; time pmits mee not at p r sent to inlarge but for Answer in Short yo u may Please to know I Promised neither Peter Jethro nor any other of y comp a life or liberty it not being in my Power to doe it ; all y I promised was to Peter Jethro viz that if he would use his Endeavo r & be Instrumental ffor y e bring ing in one eyed Jn &c. I would acquaint y e Gov r n r w th w service he had done & Improve my Interest in his behalfe this I Acquainted y e Hon rd Council w th if it had been their Pleasures to have Saved more of y m it would not have troubled mee, as to y e Squaw 1 you Mention belonging to one of Capt. Hunting s Souldiers, there was Such a one left of y c first Great Cornp* of Ind n8 l Bt [sent] down w ch Capt. Hunting desired might Stay here til himselfe & her husband Came back from Eastw d w ch I consented to & how she came among y comp a I know not I requiring none to goe ,y n to Boston but those that came in after y c Armies departure neither Knew I a word of it at Boston w n I disposed of y m soe twas her own fanlt in not Acquainting mee with it but if Said Squaw be not sent of I shall be freely willing to reimburse those Gen 4 w they gave mee for her y she may be sett at liberty being wholy ino- cent as to w 1 I me charged w" 1 1 intend ere long to be at Boston w n I doubt not but shall give you full satisfaction thereabout. I am S r yo r Humble Serv" RICHARD WALDERN. Mass. Archives, vol. 30, p. 226. 1 The Indian woman referred to in Major Walderne sjletter was Mary Nemasit, wife of John, who had been in the army with the English under Capt. Hunting during the summer, and now comes armed with a letter from Major Gookin and demands his wife and child, who were in Boston Prison, and had been bought by Messrs. Tho: Deane and James Whetcomb. Nov. 23d, 1676, the Council gives order to the prison-keeper to deliver the woman and child to her husband. See Mass. Archives, vol. 30, p. 228. 310 KING PHILIP S WAPv. There is no doubt that the general voice of the colony highly applauded the action of Major Walderne, and gave him the credit of the capture, while Major Gookin questioned the method sharply. The following list of credits is all that appears in Hull s Treas ury accounts ; and these men were those who served under him personally, the others being credited under their respective captains, and those after August 24th placed in a later journal now lost. Credited under Major Walderue. January 25 1675 Lawrence Clinton 02 15 08 Joseph Pillsbery 01 12 06 Richard Jones 02 02 00 James Ford 02 15 00 Thomas Baker 02 02 00 William Delamore 02 02 00 John Smith 02 02 90 February 29, Thomas Rowlinson 1675 02 02 00 Edward Fuller 02 02 00 March 24 th 1675-6 Joseph Fowler Henry Ducker Jeremiah Neale 03 12 00 03 12 00 01 13 09 Daniel Tenney 01 19 04 April 24 th 1676 Richard Freind 01 12 06 John Line 03 06 00 June 24 th 1676 Samuel Stanwood 02 02 00 Mark Hascall 02 14 00 Nathaniel Bray George Cross 02 02 00 02 02 00 August 24 th 1676 Edmund Henfield 01 12 00 THE WINTER EXPEDITION OF MAJOR WALDERNE TO THE EASTWARD. In following the career of Major Walderne, it will be necessary to pass over a detailed account of affairs at the Eastward, in which, however, he bore no small part, being magistrate as well as military commander of this quarter of the colony. All the Eastern settlements were broken up, and the people who were neither killed nor made captive fled to the Westward towns for safety. Desolation lay over all, from Pemaquid as far as Wells. Capt. Hathorne s forces availed but little except to keep the Indians from any general gathering and organized attack. Small parties of the enemy were scattered along the frontiers, ready to fall upon any exposed settlement. The alarms, attacks and use less pursuits were many ; till at last, about the middle of October, the celebrated " Mog," or " Mugg," came in to Major Walderne and announced himself as empowered to negotiate peace with the English on behalf of " Madockawando and Cheberrina, Sachems of Penobscot." Mog came to Boston under safe conduct from the governor, and between Nov. 6th and 13th a treaty was con cluded between the colony and the Eastward Indians, not includ ing the " Ammoscoggins " and " Pequakets." During this time Capt. Hathorne, upon information received of Mog, marched his troops up to Ossipee, expecting to find there a large body of MAJOR WALDERNE VISITS MADOCKAWANDO. 311 Indians and English captives, but found nothing but the empty fort, which they burnt, and returned to Berwick on November 9th. Upon the issue of the treaty the Council sent vessels to the Penobscot with Mog, held as voluntary hostage, to act as agent and interpreter. Madockawando was found and confirmed the treaty made with Mog, and delivered the few prisoners which he held. Mog himself was permitted to go up into the woods to another plantation to persuade other Indians to join in the treaty, and to bring in some captives which they held ; but not returning, they supposed he was either killed or detained as prisoner by the Indians, as he told them when he left them might be the result. They waited more than a week, and then came home, arriving at Boston December 25th, 1676. Nothing more was heard of the captives at the Eastward or of Mog until January 5th, when one Francis Card, a captive, escaped, and made his way to Blackpoint and thence to Boston, where he made an interesting statement of the condition of things at the Eastward ; told the story of his escape, stated the location and strength of the enemy, putting their entire fighting force at not above one hundred and fifty fighting men ; he described the country and explained the best places to land a force, and urged that an expedition be sent at once before they removed higher up the river. The details of all the matters referred to above are to be given in another chapter. The statement made by Card, and especially his im plication of Mog as a " Rogue " who came back among the Indians, and laughed at the English and their " kinde Entertain ment," and saying he had found a way to burn Boston, seems to have renewed the determination of the Council to send an expe dition immediately to attempt the recovery of their forts and the captive English. Other things also moved them, such as the dis covery that the Narraganset Indians were abroad in these East ward parts, three being captured by Major Walderne s Indians in the woods near Dover ; and when several of the chief men about Portsmouth, etc., came to Boston advising the expedition, it was determined, and Major Walderne was made commander-in- chief. The expedition consisted of two companies of sixty men from Boston and Salem ; the first, sixty Natick Indians under Capt. Samuel Hunting ; the second, sixty men under Lieut. Thomas Fiske of Wenham, whose commission for this service is preserved in the Massachusetts Archives, vol. 69, p. 106, and is dated Feb ruary 5th, 1676. These sailed from Salem the first week in Feb ruary, directly to Blackpoint, where Major Walderne met them with the forces raised by him and Capt. Frost in their parts. The Council gave Major Walderne instruction and commission as follows : 312 KING PHILIP S WAR. Instructions for Major Rich. Walderne. You shal repaire to Blacke point w th the 60 souldiers under capt. frost that you are authorized by y e Council to raise in Dover Ports mouth & yorkshire by y e 8 of feb r where you are to take under your command the other forces from Boston & Salem under the command of Capt. Hunting & Leiftenant Fiske & other sea officers, from whence w th all expedition w th the advice of your commanders you shall advance towards the enemy at Kinnebeck or elsewhere, & according to the pro posed designe, endeavour w th all silence & secresy to surprize them in their quarters wherein if it please God to succeed you, you shall do your utmost endeavour to save and secure the English prisoners. If you fail in this designe you shall assay by alle means in your power to disturb & destroy the enemy unless you have such overtures from them as may give some competent assurance that an honorable and safe peace may be concluded with them wherein you must avoyd all trifling & delayes & w" 1 all possible speed make despatch of the affaire not trusting them without first delivery of all the Captives & vessels in their hands. If you should in conclusion find it necessary to leave a garrison in Kinnebeck, wee must leave it to your discretion. You shall use utmost expedition as winds & other advantages will permit lest y e season be lost and charges seem without profitt. Praying God to be with you E. R. S. 24 Janu ry 1676 Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 101. The commission of Major Walderne : J. L. G. W" 1 the Consent of the Council. To Major Richard Walden. whereas you are apoynted Cor-in-chief of the forces Now to be raised ag the enemy the pagans in the East for the assaulting them at Kinnebeck, we have ordered the rendevous of the S d forces at Black point the 8 r feb next doe hereby order & authorize you to take under your command and conduct the S d forces w ch you are to require to obey & attend your orders & Commands as their Commander-in-chief e & you to leade conduct & order the S d forces for the best service of the country against the Common enemy whom you are to endeavour to surprize kill & destroy by all means in your power & al Com d", Officers & soulders under you are required to yeild obedience to endeavour to recover the English prisoners from out of their possession, you are also to govern the forces under your Command according to the laws enacted by the Gener a11 C to attend to all such orders & com mands as you shall receive from time to time from the general Court Councill or other Superior authority. Given in Boston 29 jan, 1676. Past E. R. S. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 101. A journal account of this expedition was kept by Major Wal derne, which Mr. Hubbard published in his History, from the original copy. Only an abstract can find place here. ON THE KENNEBEC. 313 On February 17th Major Walderne, with his whole command, sailed from Blackpoint for " Portland." l On the east side of Cape Elizabeth one of their scouts, John Pain (former keeper of the Major s Pennacook truck-house, probably), appeared and re ported the way clear of ice and Indians. They sailed across to " Mary Point " (Mare-point), arriving late at night. On the 18th the scouts found a birch canoe and the tracks of three Indians at " Muckquet " (Maquoit). Just as the companies were drawn up for the march, five canoes of Indians landed on an island opposite (probably Birch Island) and signalled for a parley ; John Pain was sent, and they promised to bring the captives in the morning. Pain returned to the Indians, and " Simon," one of their leaders, came as a hostage in his place, who being questioned by the Major, declared that " Blind Will " stirred up late trouble ; that they desired peace ; that Squando was over at the island and would return the captives to Major Walderne. Squando was summoned, and replied that he would meet the Major if he would come half way alone in a canoe. Major Walderne refused, and the Indian promised to come in the morning. On the 19th they appeared in fourteen canoes. They landed upon a point where there was a house which was set on fire, and their scouts seemed to challenge our men to fight, upon which our troops marched against them as secretly as possible, when they fled, but Capt. Frost came upon their main body and had a sharp skirmish, kill ing and wounding several without any loss to his own. But anxious for the captives, the Major immediately hung out a flag of truce, which was immediately answered with one by them. John Pain and " Simon " therefore met and had an explanation half way between the lines. The house was fired accidentally, and their scouts did not mean to challenge ours, but hailed them according to their custom ; said the captives were a great way off and had not yet arrived, but promised them next day. On the 20th they were weather-bound. On the 21st they sailed for Arrowsick. On the 22d they sailed up the river till stopped by the ice, and then landed their forces about twelve miles from Abbigadassit Fort, at which they arrived after a six-hours march, and found the fort empty. On the 23d, at a council-of-war, it was decided that Major Walderne should sail with some part of his forces for the Penobscot, while the rest should remain and build a garrison. On the 24th the Major located a site opposite the lower end of Arrowsick Island, " at John Baker s house." Sun day, February 25th, they rested at this place. On the 26th Major Walderne with sixty men in two vessels sailed for Penobscot River. On the way two Indians signalled them from a canoe off " Gyobscot Point," and John Pain and Walt. Gendal were sent to speak with them, and were told that many Indians and some English captives were at Pemaquid. The whole force immediately 1 Falmouth, this probably the first mention as " Portland." 314 KING PHILIP S WAR. set sail and came to that place about four o clock that same day, and were immediately hailed by Indians from " Mr. Gardner s Fort." John Pain was sent ashore to them and found the chief sagamore Mattahando with other sachems and " sundry sorts of Indians." The chief wished to speak with Capt. Davis, and was very desirous of peace, promising to deliver the captives then at Penobscot next morning. Capt. Davis with John Pain went ashore and stayed, while three sagamores went aboard to talk with Major Walderne, who soon after went ashore with six men unarmed, and was promised that the captives should be delivered next morning. On the 27th, after a long negotiation and a ran som of twelve skins to each captive, they delivered William Chad- burne, John Whinnick (Winnock) and John Wormwood, these being all they would own that they had, or that it could be proved that they had. Some of the old sagamores seemed to be sincere, and declared that they were against the war, but could not rule their young men. Our officers, however, had little confidence in them, and in council decided to get all the captives and then to try to surprise their whole company. In pursuance of this design the Major with five others went ashore bearing a part of the ransom and carefully providing against surprise. While looking about to discover if the Indians were as wisely provided against Christian treachery as they against heathen treachery, he found a lance-head partly concealed under a board, seizing which he immediately advanced upon the Indians, charging them with treachery, swung his cap above his head as a signal to his men to come ashore, as was agreed, while those who were with the Major immediately rallied about to defend him from the Indians who advanced to seize him, and also to secure the goods which he had brought ashore. Some squaws seized a bundle of muskets that were hidden close by, and fled with them. Capt. Frost and Lieut. Nutter captured Megunnaway, " a notorious rogue," and carried him on board their vessel. As soon as the English got on shore they pursued the Indians to their canoes so closely that they were able to kill seven before they reached their boats, and as many more probably afterwards. Four were taken prisoners, of whom one was the sister of Madockawando. The old chief Mattahando was among the killed. Not more than twenty-five warriors were present in this engagement. The English secured a large amount of plunder, about a thousand pounds of dried beef with the rest. Megunnaway was next day executed by shooting, it being de clared by witnesses that he was concerned in the killing of Thomas Bracket at Falmouth. On February 28th they sailed back to Kennebec, where Lieut. Fiske with a party of forty men secured some forty bushels of wheat, several cannon, some anchors, and a great quantity of boards from Arrowsick, a part of which they loaded upon their vessels. They killed two Indians upon Arrow- sick Island, where they discovered the body of the lamented AFTER THE WAR. 315 Capt. Lake, which was wonderfully preserved. This was brought home to Boston, where they arrived March llth, 1676-7. This expedition was the closing active military service of Major Walderne, although he still retained his office as Major, and was constantly concerned as such, and held his place as magistrate and leading citizen during his life. In the spring of 1678 this war with the Indians closed. Major Walderne, however, became involved in the strife of the factions that claimed the government of New Hampshire, and his life thus continued in turbulence, even to its tragic close, the manner of which requires here some notice, even though many years had passed after Philip s War. For about eleven years there had been peace with the Indians. The Pennacooks had long ago returned, and Kankamagus above mentioned had by his energy and wisdom restored them to some thing of their former prosperity. But this chief was somewhat impatient under the constant unjust encroachments and wrongs of the English, and their constant threats that they would bring the Mohawks upon them, and at last, involved in some new occasion of complaint, he fled to his relatives among the Andros- coggins some time in the year 1686, where, finding some others with like wrongs and resentments, he became a nucleus of dis content. There were many also scattered among the Eastern tribes who had been captured at Dover in 1676 and sold into slavery, and had made their way back to find their tribes scat tered, their families broken up and lost. To many of these nothing was left but hate and vengeance upon the English, and especially against the one man whom they believed responsible for the transaction ; the man was Major Walderne. Other causes were doubtless at work at the Eastward by the designs of the French and the Jesuit missionaries in the zeal for their religion ; but the resentment seems to have centred upon Cocheco and Major Walderne. In June, 1689, the people began to be aware of large numbers of strange Indians among those who came in to trade, and many did not seem to come for that purpose, but were ob served carefully scrutinizing the defences and approaches. The people became alarmed, and one after another many came and urged Major Walderne to take some precautions of defence. He, however, would not hearken, laughed at their fears, and told them to " go and plant their pumpkins," and he would tell them when the Indians should attack them. There were many old friends of the Major and of the English of Dover among the neighboring Indians, and some of these tried to warn them of their danger. A squaw came through the town, and here and there significantly recited the words which have been handed down in the rhyme, " O Major Waldron, you great sagamore, What will you do, Indians at your door." Capt. Thomas Henchman of Chelmsford also was apprized of 316 KING PHILIP S WAR. the plot against Dover, and sent down a letter of warning to the Council at Boston, as follows : Hon d Sir This day 2 Indians came from Pennacook, viz. Job Maramasquand and Peter Muckamug, who report y l damage will undoubtedly be done within a few days at Piscataqua, and y l Major Waldrons, in particular, is threatened ; and Intimates fears y mischief quickly will be done at Dunstable. The Indians can give a more particular account to your honor. They say iff damage be done, the blame shall not be on them, having given a faithful account of what they hear ; and are upon that report moved to leave y r habitation and corn at Pennacook. S r , I was verry loth to trouble you and to expose myself to the Censure and de rision of some of the confident people, that ware pleased to make sport of what I sent down by Capt. Tom. I am constrained from a sense of my duty and from love of my countrymen to give the acct. as above. So with my humble service to your Honor, and prayers for the safety of an Indangered people, I am, S r , your humble servant THO: HIKCHMAN. June 22 [1689] Mass. Archives, vol. 107, p. 139. This letter was received by Mr. Danforth, and on the 27th laid before Gov. Bradstreet and the Council, and a messenger was sent to Dover the same day with this warning to Major Wal- derne : Boston: 27. : June: 1689 Honor d Sir The Governor and Councill haveing this day received a Letter from Major Henchman of Chelmsford, that some Indians are come unto them, who report that there is a gathering of some Indians in or about Penecooke with designe of mischiefe to the English, amongst the said Indians is one Hawkins [Hogkins or Kankamagus] is said to be a principle designer, and that they have a particular designe against yourselfe and Mr. Peter Coffin which the Councill thought it necessary presently to dispatch Advice thereof to give you notice that you take care of yo r own Safeguard, they intending endeavour to to betray you on a pretention of Trade. Please forthwith to Signify import hereof to Mr. Coffin and others as you shall think necessary, and Advise of what Information you may receive at any time of the Indians motions. By Order in Councill, ISA: ADDINGTON, Sec y. For Major Rich d Walden and Mr. Peter Coffin or either of them at Cocheca with all possible [haste] Mass. Archives, vol. 107, p. 144. The messengers made all possible speed for Dover, but were detained at the Ferry at Newbury, and did not arrive until June 28th, the day after the blow had fallen. On the evening of the 27th two squaws applied at each of the garrison houses for per mission to sleep inside, as was often done, and two were admitted into each of the garrisons, Walderne s, Heard s and Otis s, and DEATH OF MAJOR WALDERNE. 317 were shown how to unfasten the gates if they wished to go away during the night. There was a report of a great number of Indians coming to trade next day, and the sachem Wesandowit, who had taken supper at the Major s, asked him pointedly, " Brother Waldron, what would you do if the strange Indians should come ? " "I could assemble a hundred men by lifting up my finger," replied the Major, in careless indifference. And thus all retired to rest ; no watch was placed and no precautions taken. After midnight the gates were opened by the squaws. The Indians waiting outside rushed in and took possession without any alarm and rushed into the Major s rooms. Aroused from sleep, the old man sprang up, seized his sword, and despite his eighty years, drove them before him through several rooms, but turning to secure other arms, they sprang upon him from behind and struck him down with a hatchet ; they bound him into his arm-chair and placed him upon a long table ; they mocked him, and asked, " Who shall judge Indians now ? " They compelled the family of the Major to prepare them supper, after which they drew their knives, and slashed the helpless old man across the breast, saying " I cross out my account." They then cut off his ears and nose and forced them into his mouth, till at last, when fainting with the loss of blood he was about to fall, one of them held his sword beneath him, upon which falling he expired. The following letter was written by his son, who was then at Portsmouth, as is seen : Portsm : 28 th : June 1689 ab* 8 a clock morning Just now came ashore here From Cocheca Jn Ham & his wife who went hence last night home wo d (they living w th in a mile of Maj r Waldron) & ab break of the day goeing up the river in a cannoo they heard guns fired but notw th standing proceeded to Land at Maj r Waldrons landing place by w ch time it began to be light & then they Saw ab 1 twenty Ind n " near Mr. Coffins Garrison Shooting & Shouting as many more about Richard Otis s & Tlio: Pains but Saw their way clear to Maj r Waldrons where they Intended Imediately to secure themselves but comeing to the gate & calling & knocking could receive noe answer yet saw a light in one of y e Chambers & one of y m say (looking through a crack of the gate) that he saw Sundry Ind ns w th in y e Garrison w ch sup pose had murther d Maj r Waldron & his Familie & thereupon they betook y m selves to make an escape w ch they did & mett w th one of Otis sons who alsoe escaped from his Fathers garrison Informing y his Father and y rest of the Family were killed. Quickly after [they] set sundry houses afire this is all the Ace" wee have at p r seut w ch being given in a Surprize may admitt of some alteration but Doubtlesse the most of those Families at or ab Cochecha are destroyed. The above Ace" was related to mee. RICHARD WALDRON, jun r . Mass. Archives, Hutchinsou Papers, vol. 3, p. 376. Thus tragically closed the eventful life of Major Richard Wal- derne, in the opinion of many the most notable of the early settlers of New Hampshire. XXII . CAPTAIN WILLIAM HATHORNE. WILLIAM HATHORNE, the father of Captain William Hathorne, was the son of William and Sara, of Binfield, Berkshire Co., England, born about 1607, and came to this country with Winthrop, in the Arbella, in 1630, and settled first at Dorchester, where he was a land holder, and appears prominently in affairs in the earliest days of the settlement, and until 1636, when he removed to Salem. He was admitted free man in 1634, and was chosen deputy in 1635 and 1637, and from Salem many times afterwards ; and when, in 1644, the " House of Deputies " elected a Speaker for the first time, he was elected, and served in that position for several years afterwards. He was elected Assistant in 1662, which office he retained until 1679, and the history of the times in which he lived shows him to have been one of the most able, energetic, and widely influential men in New England, in his day. He was mentioned as present at the great " training " at Boston, 1639 ; was commissioned Captain of the company at Salem, May 1, 1646, and Major before 1656. See also " Wonder-working Providence," p. 109. While he was evidently narrow and bigoted in his religious theories, and arbi trary and intolerant in the administration of affairs, both of church and state, he was the zealous and fearless advocate of the personal rights of freemen as against royal emissaries and agents. The investigations of our Mr. Waters, in the English Archives, have revealed the Hathorne ancestry in England as given above, and from additional data gathered by him and others, we have room for the following brief statement, tracing the descent of the distinguished Nathaniel Hawthorne of our own day from this eminent ancestor. William 2 Hathorne brought with him to this country his wife Anne, by whom he had children : i. A daughter. 2 ii. Sarah,- b. March 11, 1634-5; m. Joseph Coker, of Newbury. iii. Eleazer, 2 b. Aug. 1, 1637 ; m. Abigail, dau. of George Curwen. iv. Nathaniel, 2 b. Aug. 11, 1639. v. JOHN, 2 b. Aug. 5, 1641 ; m. RUTH GARDNER, dau. of George. THE HATHOKNE FAMILY. 319 vi. Anna, 2 b. Dec. 12, 1643; m. Joseph Porter. vii. WILLIAM, 2 b. April 1, 1645; m. Sarah . viii. Elizabeth, 2 b. 1649 ; m. Israel Porter. Major William Hatliorne died in 1681, in his 74th year. Will probated June 28, 1681 ; mentions son William lately deceased, and Sarah the widow of the same, and her heirs ; appoints wife Anne sole executrix. JOHN 2 Hathorne, distinguished both in civil and military af fairs, serving as Captain in the war with the Eastern Indians, the Colonel of a regiment, and in the expedition of 1696 chief commander ; admitted freeman 1677 ; Deputy, 1683 ; Assistant, 1684-1711 (except in Andres s brief rule), and is remembered unhappily as the most intolerant and cruel of the judges in the witchcraft delusion. He had, by his wife Ruth (Gardner) : i. John. 3 ii. Nathaniel. 3 iii. Ebenezer. 3 iv. JOSEPH, 3 bapt. June, 1691 ; m. Sarah, dau. of William Bowditch. v. Ruth. 3 vi. Benjamin. 3 JOSEPH 3 and Sarah (Bowditch) had children: 1. William. 4 2. Joseph. 4 3. John. 4 4. Sarah. 4 5. Ebeuezer. 4 6. DANIEL. 4 7. Ruth. 4 DANIEL, 4 m. Rachel Phelps, and had children: 1. Daniel, 5 died soon. 2. Sarah. 5 3. Eunice. 5 4. Daniel, 5 2d. 5. Judith. 5 6. NATHANIEL, 5 b. May 19, 1775; he was a sea captain and died in Surinam in 1808 ; married Elizabeth Clark Man ning and had two children: 1. Elizabeth Manning, b. Mar. 7, 1802. 2. NATHANIEL," b. July 4, 1804 ; m. Sophia Peabody, at Salem, July, 1842, and died at Plymouth, N. H., May 19, 1864. He changed the old surname to Haw thorne, and by his genius placed it in the front rank of the world s great authors. The apology for this digression is the eminence of this Nathaniel Hawthorne. Other descendants of Major William, 1 through other lines of descent than John and William, Jr., are scattered over the whole country, and bear both forms of the surname, Capt. WILLIAM 2 HATHORNE, son of Major William, and the subject of this sketch, has, in all published accounts known to me, been very strangely overlooked by being identified as one with his father. My attention was first called to the error of that sup position by the mention of his " father " in his letter from Casco, Sept. 22, 1676. I found that he was engaged at the Eastward from September 6th up to November 10th, and that his father, Major William, Assistant, was present in his place in the General Court at Boston most of that time ; that administration upon the estate of Capt. William was granted to his widow Sarah, February 4, 1678-9, Daniel Gookin and William Hathorne (Major) being the Magistrates, Major William died 1681, and in his will men- 320 KING PHILIP S WAR. tions having given his son William land at Groton which he confirms to his widow Sarah and her heirs. In the expedition of December, 1675, against the Narragansets, as has been previously noted, Capt. Hathorne was appointed lieu tenant of the company under Capt. Joseph Gardiner, and when that brave officer fell, at the great " Fort Fight," he succeeded to the command of the company, which he held during the remainder of that campaign, and, as we have seen in that chapter, most of that company were paid off as having served under him. In August, 1676, Capt. Hathorne was again called into service (as has been noted in several previous chapters), to take com mand of the forces sent to the Eastward. After the surrender of the great body of Indians at Cochecho was accomplished in September, Capt. Hathorne immediately pushed forward with his forces towards the East. He had a force of four companies besides his own, numbering, probably, in all, nearly four hundred men ; his own and Capt. Sill s men numbered one hundred and thirty, and, together with Capt. Hunting s company of forty Indians, made up the Massachusetts quota, to which Major Walderne was expected to add about as many more of his own men and recruits in Yorkshire, these last two companies to be under Capt. Charles Frost of Kittery, and the whole force under Capt. Hathorne as Major. This " army " marched from Berwick to Wells on Sept. 8th, where they prob ably were delayed for a day or two, organizing for the march and deliberating as to the marching to Ossipee, where it was rumored that a large force of Indians with their women and children were gathered in an old fort which some traders had built them as against the Mohawks, and where were a good many English captives taken just before from the plantations, from Kennebec to Casco. This expedition was the plan of General Denison, but discretionary power had been given Capt. Hathorne, and as rumors of large bodies of Indians still threatened the people that remained shut up in their garrisons in some of the seaside towns, who would perhaps fall upon these nearer places if they should withdraw, it was finally decided to go to the relief of the threat ened towns. They accordingly marched from Wells to Winter Harbor, and thence by water passed to Blackpoint, and thence to Casco, where they arrived on the 19th, and on the 22d the Cap tain sends the following letter : CASCHO 22 d Sept. 1676. Hon d Sir Att 9 a clock at night. I have not had anything to writte nor anythinge woorth Informa tion, wee came Into these parts y e 19 th Instant when we catched an Indian ; Sagamore of Peggwakick (and took y e gun of another) who informed us that Kennebec Indians were to come Into these parts that night or the next day he told us that y e Indians In these parts are not above 30 or 40 fighting men & that these keep upp at Orsybee or Peg- gwackick, which is :60: myles from us, he saith he knows of no CAPT. HATHORNE AT CASCO BAY. 321 French men among them as y e Inhabitants Informed us, wee found him in many lyes, & so ordered him to be put to death, & y e Cochecho Indians to be his executioners ; which was redily done by them, this day, going over a River wee were Ambuscaded, but soon gott over and putt them to flight, killed dead In y e Place but one Named Jn Sampson, who was well acquainted with Maj. Waldens Indians, they say he was a Captaine, but such are all y e Eunemyes they kill (he was double Armed which wee took) wee find itt very difficult to come neire them there is soe many Rivers & soe much broken land, that they soon Escape by canoes ; y e country being full of them, I would Intreat your Hon rs to Order something Concerning y e State of affaires here, Many Inhabitants of y e place being come to take off, these Come and kill there Cattle only they want some helpe from us, I know not whether it may be for y e Interest of y e Country for all to stay ; & If wee goe into y e Country to Peggwackick we can leave none, I desire your Hon" Advise and commands concerning this Also, Wee have had noe bread these three dayes I suppose y e reason is y e contrary Winds, because I have sent to Mr. Martin twice ; have had one returne but noe bread, wee can do well without unless we goe up into y e country while our people are in health as they are generally praysed be y e Lord for itt, I Humbly Request your Honour to Remmember my duty to my father & Love to Rest of Friends, If you have an opportunity & soe I Rest your Hon" Humble Servant WILLIAM HATHORNE. The Indian that was taken told us that there be 20 English Captives at Peggwackick 2 of them men, & that Capt. Lake was killed, they say that Kennebeck Indians kill all. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 61. I have found no reference to the place which Capt. Hathorne s troops occupied during their stay at Falmouth, but as it appears that the Neck had been deserted, and the outlying residents driven away and their homes destroyed, it seems probable that those who had fled to Blackpoint and vicinity for safety, mostly returned with the troops to Munjoy s Garrison, and among these were probably George Felt and those others who, on Sept. 23d, ventured in boats upon " Munjoy s Island " (to secure some sheep left there in their flight), and were all cut off by the Indians who were concealed there, lying in wait. Felt and his companions made a desperate resistance, having fled to the ruins of an old " Stone House," but were overpowered and destroyed. This was in plain sight of our forces, who lacking boats sufficient, were entirely unable to prevent the sad issue of this attempt, against which Capt. Hathorne had earnestly protested, there being no sufficient vessel to carry over an adequate guard, and a large body of the enemy known to be in the vicinity. Our Indian scouts were out after the enemy constantly, and captured those referred to in the letter, and evidently did nearly all the really effective work, for which, however, but little credit was given them by the English, except suspicion of carelessness or treachery and 322 KING PHILIP S WAR. cowardice ; and yet Capt. Hathorne s next letter protests against the withdrawal of these same Indians. It was very hard for the English to learn that their unwieldy troops and clumsy methods were no match for the quick-moving and wary enemy, who fled before the advance of the troops, and then dodging around them, struck a blow in the rear. Two days after the tragedy at Mun- joy s Island, another party struck a sudden blow at Wells, and anon at Cape Neddick, which occasioned the immediate return of the forces to that place, as will appear by the following letter : WELLS: 2: 8: 1676 Hon rd Senat" Att 9 clock morning I received your Ord r of y e 16 th of Sept r on y e 25 th of y e same. In Answare to w ch , I have sent Capt. Hunting from here to Maj r Walden; y e occation of our Returne was y e sad news of y e Enimy, burning Cape nettick & destroying y e people to y e number of 6 or 7 persons besids those of this towne which are : 3 : two of them y e 24 th y e other :27 th : of the month ; In our Returne wee mett with divers things of concern ment w ch I Ingadged to Aquaint your Hon rs with ; Imp 9 , att black- point, the people there are in great distraction and disorder ; I know not of former Neglects but now they are a people uugoverned, & Attend little to y e Government there established soe that y e most of y e towne desert y e place, though we told them of a law they were Ignorant of w ch we think we doe perfectly remember of 20 Ib penalty for any that desert y e frontiers, w ch we thinke is most Rationall, y e Inhabittants there having little to doe ; we are ready to thinke they might better be Imployed there than many of ours, who have famillys att home and a considerable charge, to be brief e Capt. Josliu & Capt. Scottow desire an Expresse from your Hon" they having had noe knowledge of y e law. 2 dly Major Pembleton att Winter Harbour w th Whome I would have left some men ; as Also w th Mr. Warrin they made these objections ; The Maj rs were these : That he could not subsist long, & he had as good remove while he had something as to stay while all was spent, Therefore unlesse Country sends a supply or Maintaine y e Garrison there ; he cannot hold out, Mr. Warrin is otherwise minded but I can not Enlarge, supposing Maj r Clarke can Inform your Hon", Since our Comming Heither we have consulted y e Millitia, who Informe us that the mind of this towne In Gen 11 is to leave the place, & though y e Hon rd Court or Councell have formerly given an Ord r concerning them ; In paticul r yett yy now begg that itt might be renewed & that your Hon would Ord r as to these Numb" of Garrison Souldiers, Soe to maintain- ance, they being poore yet many of them willing According to Abillity, The next thing I shall trouble your Hoii" w th is y e disatisfaction that is among 8 our selves, about y e drawing y e Indians off, & Maj r Waldens libberty to Command off Capt. Frost, w ch he pretends to have, the w ch are two thirds and more of y 6 Army, Capt. Sells Company & myne being not above .9. or .10. fyles now who are judged here not more then is necessary to Garrison this towne & York, we would be bold to speak our minds further, & Crave that your Hon" may not be offended at us, or Receive from others false Information, The Indians thus drawne off by themselves as long as they have only Ind n Speritts, will CLOSING SERVICE OF CAPT. HATHORNE. 323 doe little or noe service for y c Country who In tyme of Ingadgment ever took y e English for there bullwark, & will not Charge to Any pur pose until y c Emmy ffly, I think some of us have had tyme to be Aquainted w th there manners As to my selfe I would Humbly Request your Hon to call me home ; though I have An Earnest desire to doe god & y e Country service, yett there is a Straing Antypathy in me Against lying in Garrison, Here is many of our Company sick of violent distemp one of myne is dead & two others I much feare, The Lord derect your Hon" & give us your servants prudence to Act by your Ord rs According to his good will and pleasure. I remaine Your Hon" Humble Servant WILLIAM HATHORNE. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 65. After the return to Wells there was delay and uncertainty about preparations for the march to Ossipee, until the news of the capture of Black point and the threatened approach of the vic torious Indians put the troops upon the guard of the towns near at hand. Capt. Hathorne and his forces remained in these parts in service until November 1st, when in company with Capt. Sill he set forth upon the long delayed march to Ossipee, where they arrived after a very hard march of four days, finding never an Indian on the way or at the Great Fort. The Captain sent a party of his men up some twenty miles farther, but without result, and having burnt the fort, the companies returned to Ber wick, where they arrived on November 9th. In the meantime, the treaty with Sachem Mugg had been concluded, and the troops under Capt. Hathorne were soon dismissed. It will be remembered that the latest credits contained in Hull s accounts are September 23, 1676, so that the men serving under the Captain in this expedition had credit in a later Journal, which is now lost. For earlier credits see ante, p. 166. The following petition explains itself : To the Hon d Generall Court now Assembled in Boston ; 1679 ; The humble peticon of Sarah Hathorne widdow to Capt. William Hathorne deceased Humbly Showeth That your peticoners late husband, being employed in the Countreyes service against the Indians, was not satisfyed the arrears due to him for his said service ; the bill not being delivered to the Treasurer in time, through the negligence of the constable; which caused the Treasurer to refuse payment ; and your peticoners husband, being deceased, hath left your peticoner in a meane condition, as to her outward estate, being indebted to severall persons and not in a capacitye to make payment, without receiving her late husbands arrears from the country. The p r misses considered your peticoner humbly craves, this hon d 324 KING PHILIP S WAR. Court would be pleased to order speedy payment of the arrears due to her late husband, in such proportion as yo r hon" in wisdom shall judge convenient. And yo r peticoner (as in duty bound) shall pray for you r Hono" prosperity. SARAH HATHOBNE. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 237. This was granted. See also Coll. Records, Vol. V., p. 282. XXIII. CAPT. JOSHUA SCOTTOW AND HIS MEN. JOSHUA SCOTTOW came to Boston with his mother Thoma- sine, who joined the church September 21, 1634. He with his brother Thomas joined the church May 19, 1639. He married Lydia , and had Joshua, b. Sept. 30, 1641, and died soon ; Joshua, b. Aug. 12, 1643 ; Lydia, bapt. June 29, 1645 ; Elizabeth, b. July 29, 1647 ; Rebecca, b. October 10, 1652 ; Mary, b. May 11, 1656 ; Thomas, June 30, 1659, grad. H. C. 1677. Capt. Scottow was of the Artillery Company in 1645, Ensign in 1656, and Captain afterwards. Elizabeth Scottow m. Thomas, son of Major Thomas Savage, and had a large family. Rebecca m. Benjamin Blackman, April 1, 1675, and Mary m. Samuel Checkley. Capt. Scottow was a very energetic man, an enterprising and eminently prosperous merchant. He was largely engaged in foreign commercial transactions, and from 1654-7 was the con fidential agent of La Tour in his business with our colony. In 1660 Mr. Scottow bought of Abraham Jocelyn, of Black- point, two hundred acres of land, including the hill since known as " Scottoway s Hill ; " and in 1666 he purchased of Henry Jocelyii the " Cammock Patent," which at the granting to Thomas Cammock in 1631 consisted of fifteen hundred acres of land lying between the Blackpoint and Spurwink rivers. Cam- mock left his entire estate to his friend Henry Jocelyn, with the care of his widow during her life. Jocelyn married the widow Margaret, and some twenty years afterwards conveyed the property as above, together with seven hundred and fifty acres outside the Patent, remaining upon it, however, as agent for Mr. Scottow. Capt. Scottow removed to Blackpoint settlement about 1670, and engaged with great energy in improving his property there, and in his fishing and commercial transactions. The first mention I have found connecting Capt. Scottow with the Indian war is in the Colonial Records, vol. V., p. 57, at the session of the Court convened October 13, 1675, as follows : Upon the sad intelligence from Saco & the great danger of all those parts, it is ordered, that there be 50 soldiers immediately from Boston and Charls Toune sent away in some vessel or vessells for the releife 326 KING PHILIP S WAR. of those parts, and that they be under the command of Leiftenn Scot- toway, and that Major Clarke take care that this order be effected as to the dispatch of the men, & furnishing ammunition and prouission for the voyage. The "sad intelligence" was connected with the attack upon Saco, the details of which are in Major Walderne s letter of Sep tember 25, 1675, given heretofore ; Robert Nichols and his wife were killed just before this by the Indians who had made an unsuccessful assault upon Major Phillips s garrison at Saco. But previous to these occurrences, Capt. Scottow had fortified and provisioned his house and gathered into it as many of the people as would come. His garrison was the Jocelyn House on the " Neck," distant from the farms of many of the inhabitants, who reluctantly abandoned their homes, cattle and crops to the ruin which was daily threatened. It seems evident that Capt. Scottow, with the small number of undisciplined men under his command, mostly inhabitants, and those employed by him, was in no capacity to send out a relief party to other parts of the town ; and when the Indians attacked some of these still remain ing on their farms, it was plainly imprudent to risk any small party such only as he could have sent, to the almost certain ambushment and destruction, to which the burning, and firing of guns seemed to invite them. His enemies sometime afterwards sought to injure him by bringing charges of neglect to help his neighbors, among other charges preferred against him. The Alger brothers, Andrew and Arthur, had a large estate at that part of Scarborough known as Dunstan, and so named by them for their old English home, and they had there a fortified house, but upon the opening of hostilities evidently withdrew their families into Sheldon s garrison at Blackpoint. When Major Walderne had returned home he left sixty of his soldiers to gar rison the different settlements, Saco, Falmouth and Scarborough, and these were distributed according to the need, at Scottow s, Sheldon s and Foxwell s garrison-houses. Capt. John Wincoll was posted at Foxwell s with a company of soldiers, and in Octo ber was assisting the settlers to harvest their corn. One of Capt. Wincoll s soldiers, Peter Witham, was detailed to help the Algers get their grain, and said that a few days after, as they with some of their relations were getting their goods from their houses, they were attacked by the Indians, when Andrew w r as killed and Arthur mortally wounded ; and the said Witham, fifty-three years afterwards, being then seventy-two years old, testified that he helped to bury both the Algers. Mr. Hubbard gives the date of the attack upon the Algers October 9th, 1675. The events of the war in Scarborough immediately following the above, are shown in the following letter from Capt. Scottow : CAPT. SCOTTOW AT BLACKPOINT. 327 Honoured S r . After all due submission to y r self w" 1 the Honoured Councill, these are to declare y e state of y e affaires at p r sent, since y sent by Jo: Short o r men being sent up y e riv r to secure those barnes of corne left w ch accordingly they applyed y m selves to doe and to repaire o r water-mill (being o r onely relief for grinding) they met w th no opposition nor could have sight for 3 daies of above one Indian upon the 3 d of this curr they having finished one mans corne & upon landing of it in canoes 19 of o r p r tie being there were assaulted and surrounded by at least 60 or 80 Indians & had bin all cut of had not S rt Tippet come in with his p r tie to their timous relief who was on y e other side river to help wheat &c. out of another barne whereupon the enimy retreated into the bushes it being a foggy day could not soe well discerne w ex ecution they did upon y m disinabling one Indian soe as to leave his speare behind him, much firing on both sides, one of us wounded one drowned by hasting into a cano, next day a country souldier of his own accord went downe y e marsh & hollowed & an Indian came up to him being of Piscataquay & his acquaintance they plied and smok a pipe of tobacco together y c Indian having laid down his gun & he seemingly did y e same, a small riv r p r ting y m . (y e larger narrative C. Winkall & myself have sent to Maj r Walden to be conveyed unto y c Maj r Gen 11 I refer y r Honours unto) y e sub stance of y e discourse was they willingly would have peace, & kept 2 women two casco children, foure men prisoners to dd lr up if it might be &c. if not let time and place be appointed & they would fight y e english & as it was misreported to C. Winkoll & myself they would stay 48 hours for an answer but it seeme it was y e next day the Indian put his signall next day but none having an order to treat him, o r men there fore secure the wheat threshed out & a shallop being there to fetch it of they sent none to discourse him, upon w ch they y e enemy as they had done y e day before & y during the parlee fired stacks of hay and some houses ; o r men y afternoon being pinched for want of bread and of victualls, could not be prevailed with by their officers to continue in y e f arme house which they had fortified until further order w ch was designed a retreating place upon fighting y m though a small rev r pted y m & y c Indians rendezvouze, in order to fighting y m I had visited y e next gar rison and drawn of w I durst to assist o r soldiers up y e riv r , but towards y e evening understanding o r mens resolves, sent y m up bread &c. with an express charge not to desert y c place w th out further order, but it could not come to y m soe as to hinder their moving downe w chl was upon the 5 th day curr 1 in the night next morning we designed y e sending y ra all up as soone as y e tide would p mit, & had ordered all to y end but upon y e sight of theire enemies burning of y 1 house w ch they had fortified & of my barne of corne which was left unburnt there w th ad vice of Cap ne Winkoll & the rest of y e officers, we altered o r designe & this day purpose w th all o r strength to fetch in the inhabitants corne left in their deserted houses, the enemy firing all before y m in w ch doing an opportunity of fighting y m may also psent w ch o r souldiers long for but we want fixed armes divers of these sent, not servicable & two or three disenabled in o r last ingagement, please to dispatch o r supply of flints &c. sent for in my last to Maj r Clark we are in distress for want of y m , especially bread not having but two dayes bread left at a cake a 328 KING PHILIP S WAR. day w th y e allowance I reduced o r souldiers unto at first coming, w ch bread is borrowed from fishermen and myself we have no grinding nearer than Piscataquay, not else but begging prayers and y 4 y e deluge of sin w ch I grieve is among o r souldiers as well as inhabitants may be stopped by reason whereof this overflowing scourge pursueth us (this place being now y e seat & center of y e Eastward war) Casco & Kenebec being all quiet & peace as by yesterdies intelligence I understand, I humbly subscribe myself ffrom y e Head quarters at Blackpoiut y r> & y e Countries at 3 : o :clock in y c morning this 6 th most humble serv* 9 br 1675 JOSH: SCOTTOW. (Postscript.) May it please you to take notice that instead of the 50 designed here are but 38 sent div ree of y m insufficient for service & some soe mutinous that we cant with safety inflict y e punishment they deserve, for the pursueing of my comition here is need of 100 men completely armed and bread sent, for flesh I hope we have enough. Mass. Archives, vol. 68, pp. 44-5. The following letter is evidently in answer to the above from Capt. Scottow : COUNCIL S LETTER TO CAPT. SCOTTOW. Capt. Scottow. We received yo 1 lett er & saw another sent by you to Maj r Walderne ; we gceive y e Indians do sometimes allarum you and obstruct y e getting in of provisions & corne if such another overture as that Indian made y l met y c soldier in y e marsh for a treaty of peace to deliver y e english prisoners should be made againe wee advise order & som of you there to treat w th y m & see what termes you can come to & Apoint a cessation of armes untill their offers may be considered by us & endeavour to procure y e delivery of prisoners & wee will deliver as many of theirs y are at Boston, peace is better if it can be obtained upon good termes & som pledges or hostages given ; for security ; as for a supply of more men we cannot comply w th you therein ; wee have so many places to strengthen y 1 wee cannot doe alle ; wee are sure you have as great a proportion as most places of y e like concernement, we here you want neither corne, flesh nor fish & so long you be in straits & though yo r mills ly at a distance yet a samp morter or two will make a supply to pvent any great sufferings as for sending of Bisket we dare not give y e p sedent, for all other places garrisoned by the country soldiers are p vided for with victualls by y e people they secure ; it is enough for y e Country to pay wages & find ammunition ; our armies y* are in motion require more y n the Country is well able to beare especilly yo r easterne parts are concerned to ease the publicke purse what they may because they know of nothing y* was ever put into it from thense. Therefore wee desire you to make the best Improvement you can w 01 the strength you have fo r your owne deffense & offense of the enimy until God send beter times ; wee have inclosed the printed laws to restrayne mutinous soldiers let y m be read to y e soldiers. And notice taken of y m y 1 transgresse ; & if you find yourself too weeke to deale w th them let y c ringleaders bee sent to prison w th evidense of y e fact ; CAPT. SCOTTOW S JOURNAL. 329 wee have not more at psent but desire the Lords psence blessing & protection to be w to & over you alle remaine your loving friends postscript if you find our soldiers any Burden or inconvenience to you you are Authorized hereby to dismise y m or any of y m either thither or to Maj r Walderne Past this letter by the councill the 15 th of Endorsed " Councills letter to Capt. Scottow 16: 9 mo. 1675." Mass. Archives, vol. 68, p. 59. Details of the service from October 25, 1675, to May 1676, are given in the following Journal which is preserved in manuscript in the Library of the Massachusetts Historical Society. The manuscript is evidently a copy, made probably in 1676, when his use of the troops was called in question. This shows that much of the damage done in Scarborough was effected either before he had men or means to prevent it, and afterwards in spite of his best endeavors. These extracts contain the substance of the journal. EXTRACTS FROM A MANUSCRIPT JOURNAL OF CAPT. SCOTTOW. Narrative of a Journall of the diverse marches & improvement of Boston souldiers sent to Black Point. 1676. 1 (8) 25. Siev r . Serg landed 15 men. I disposed 6 of y m to ffoxwell s garrison at Bluepoint, 6 to Shelden s garrison, and retayned 3 of y m , received a l tre from Major Pendleton and answered it. 26 and 27, no disturbance. I went and viewed the fortifications at the several garrisons, and discharged Mr. ffoxwell from his charge at Bluepoint, being a quarreling, discontented p son . 29, Tho: Michel] arrived with 23 soldiers who landed two houres before day. 30, sent y e 6 scouts up y e river to discover y e enemy and view a house w ch y e enemy ordinarily possessed, returned seeing 3 Indians. 31, that night two hours before day sent up 60 men under the con duct of Capt. Winkall who landed before day to save w l corne they could of our Inhabit 8 & fight y e enemy if found, they having appeared not long before at ffoxwell s Garrison and shot a scout as appe th pr C. Winkolls l trg No. 2. Answered Maj. Pendleton s l tre No. 3. (9) 1 ,"dispatched a shallop to Boston w th l tcri to Hon: Gou r and coun cil for flints, bread &c. 2, .... In the afternoon about 29 inhabitants were set upon by 70 or 80 Indians and had almost surrounded y m had they not been timously relieved by Serg 4 Tipping who came to their relief, beat y m into y* swampes and gagned an Indian Speare. 3, Serg* Tipping sent down for recruit of powder &c. w eh I sent up by y e two carpenters and others who were come down I sent up 28 Ibs of powder in a box and 90 Ibs shot &c. that day there fell out a parlee betweene a country soldier & an Indian 1 This date is plainly a mistake made at the time of copying, in the summer of 1676. The Jour nal iteelf was kept in 1675. 330 KING PHILIP S WAR. Cap ne Winkoll came down y night, we gave advice of the whole to Maj. Walden and y 4 we intended to fight y e Indians. 4, they fell firing barnes of neer houses, haystacks and all before y m . Y e souldiers having got about 100 bush : wheat and other graiue, and a shallop sent to bring it downe they could not be prevailed upon w th all by their Serg (as I was informed) to continue any longer being pinched for want of bread by an unworthy planter, though they wanted no flesh. 5, As soon as I heard of their intention I sent up of all the biskit I had with tobacco and rum for their incouragem , and an expresse charge to fight y e enemy as appe nh by the witues of John Libby, Boudeu and Howell No. 1 and the order delivered ffoxwell to carry up ; but no Cano could be got though I used my utmost indeav r , they came down about 10 o clock in the night 6, o r men went up headed by Cap" 6 Winkoll to secure what corne of o r inhabitants was left in the N. East side in the deserted houses, and of barnes, hoping to meet y e enemy in y e march, w ch accordingly fell out, dividing themselves into 2 parties one of them was first ingaged by a party of Indians, not above 12 shewing themselves, and the other by about 16, they were engaged also and had 2 skulking skirmishes, beat y m into y e swampes. One of the Boston souldiers was mortally wounded in y e breast. O r men retreated carrying off their wounded man November 7, Being Lord s day, the enemy, early in the morning burnt those houses and barnes our Cap" 6 saved the day before they burnt also 8 or 9 deserted houses belonging to Jo : Libby and children. As soon as these fires were discovered all the souldiers and Inhabitants hasted to next garrison which was little above musket shot of them : the tyde being up and spryng tyde the bridge was overflowed which obstructed their passage witness Willet and Tydy &c. As soon as they could pass being headed by Cap ne Wiukoll and Topping they scour the round of the towne on the N. East supposing y e enemy was gone that way to fire those houses they being only left unburnt, they met with no Indians in the march the whole day ; met Lieut. Ingersoll and 12 Casco men who came to joyn with our men to search out and fight the Indians that night there fell a small flight of snow. 8, We staid in our quarter till midnight got 2 shallops. 9, Landed 70 men 3 hours before day at Blue Point to find out y e enemy, they had a tedious march the whole day through swampes marshes and creeks sometimes to the knees, others to the waist in snow and salt-water saw some Indian tracts but could find no Indians ; Lieut. Ingersoll and all his men returned discouraged home. 10, Our men returned to their quarters. 1 1 , A mysty wet day, no handling arms nor marching. 12, Much wind at N. West, no gitting over rivers, y e canos ony other side imployed to git in Cummins corne of Sacho to Bluepoint. 13, Cap ne Wiukoll, Sg l Tipping and our company got over y e river and marched to find Indians and drive cattell; the enemy fired two deserted houses at Sacho while o r men were on this side and bro home between 20 and 30 head of Sacho cattell. 14, Sabbath day no disturbance bury d Sam: Ryall wounded a week before. 15, no mocion. 16, marched to drive in cattell, were THE GARRISON AT BLACKPOINT. 331 disappointed by a Quaker who drove them into the woods from us. 17, Indians came from across y e water. 18, Cap ne Winkoll and the country souldiers w ch was attending drove cattell for Cummins and Rogers inhabitants of Sacho. 19, drove cattell for Macshawin, inhab itant of Sachc. 20, I received orders from Maj r Walden to fit out Lieut. Ingersol to Maj r Pendleton w ch I wrote to him I was upon doing. 21, No disturbance being Sabbath day. 22, Serg Topping and o r men went to Dunsten to drive in cattell. 23, Lieut. Ingersoll came to y e head quarters with 12 men and w th orders from o r Major to make them up to 60 or 70. 24, I made up his number to 60 men, supplying them with 8 biskit cake a man of mine own store . . . . L Ingersoll went up in the night to Bluepoint, landed before day with 2 shallopes, marched up the country to the head of Sacho Falls. 25-27, Continued out one night, returned to y e headquarters and he dismissed our souldiers ; L l Ingersoll returning to Casco ; sent me a l tre , to send him up 45 souldiers &c. towards his towne of Casco it being alarumed in his absence by one house burning and a man wounded. L Ingersoll came himself to our headquarters to demand the p rty .... he was satisfied with 20 men, and I made up Maj. Pendletons relief 20 w ch were dispatched with all speed great wind at N. West. 28, Mr. Neales house burnt at Casco. 30, Serg and his comp y returned from Casco. (10) 5, Tho: Michell arrived from Boston with a license to myself to come to Boston, and order to send y e Boston souldiers home if care was not taken to provide for y m . The rest of the Journal gives account of his arrangement to leave home for Boston, taking one half the Boston soldiers with him, and disposing the remainder, numbering nineteen, at various fortified houses where needed : seven at William Sheldon s ; six at Mr. Foxwell s ; four at Scottow s, being " the Serg , Steward, drum and a cooke to provide for them when they should all draw up to their head-quarters." Capt. Scottow sailed with the soldiers, from Blackpoint, on January 8th, and arrived in Boston on the llth. He returned to his charge at Blackpoint April 9th, 1676, and a treaty being in progress by Major Walderne, with the Indians, he arranged with his soldiers to go into his woods and cut " palisado pines," for fortifying his garrison house. There can be no doubt that Capt. Scottow was of great help in promoting the interests and assuring the safety of the people at Blackpoint ; and yet he experienced the most bitter hostility and opposition from many of the inhabitants, among whom were some of the most reliable and respectable. Richard Foxwell was doubtless jealous of the large interest and influence which his extensive property gave him, as well as his loyal adhesion to the Massachusetts Court. In common with many others of the early settlers, Foxwell looked upon Scottow as a new comer, who with his Boston ideas and manners came to usurp the rightful position 332 KING PHILIP S WAR. of those who had held the settlement from the beginning; and it is probable that jealousy and envy largely induced the bitter hostility and the very serious charges that were preferred against Capt. Scottow. No further trouble with the Indians seems to have disturbed Blackpoint until August, 1676. Capt. Scottow busied himself settling his accounts and strengthening his garrison ; but upon presenting his accounts for settlement by the court, he found that several of his enemies had presented complaints against his management, and a remonstrance against the payment of his accounts, as follows : PETITION AGAINST CAPT. SCOTTOW. Wee whose names wee have underwritten, doe declare thai we were never in y e least privie to y e sending for y e souldiers which came from Boston to Blackpoint, neither during y e time of their stay did we in any sort receive advantage by them ; but y l they were maintained upon y e acct. of Mr. Scottow : for all the while his fishermen were thereby capa citated to keep at sea for the whole season ; and much worke was done by them which was greatlie turned to his profit ; as removing of a great barn, paving before his house and cutting of Palisado stuff for a pre tended fortification where there is no occasion nor need. And many more such courtesies Mr. Scottow (got) by the soldiers. And that other men should pay for his work, done under pretence of defending y e country, wee hope in behalf of the rest of y e sufferers in these sad times, you will please to take it into your serious consideration, and heape no more upon us than wee are able to beare, but where the benefit has been received, there order y e charge to be levied. Richard Foxwell, Giles Barge, Rol: Allanson, Joseph Oliver, William Sheldon, John Cocke, John Tinney. Upon the above representations, several of the prominent men of York County carried the matter to the General Court ; among these Major Pendleton, Mr. Munjoy and Mr. Foxwell were the chief complainants, and their complaints were submitted, by the auditors of York County, to the General Court August 9th, 1676 (see Colonial Records, Vol. V. p. 102). The auditing committee were Nicholas Shapleigh, Edward Rishworth, Samuel Wheel wright. The complaints were : 1st, That Mr. Scottow got the soldiers from Boston upon his own responsibility. 2nd, That he refused to use or have others use the soldiers to pre serve the lives and estates of others. 3d, That he used the soldiers mostly for his own particular security and advantage ; attending and strengthening his garrison, paving his yard, moving his barn, " cleaving" his wood, &c. CAPT. SCOTTOW ACCUSED. 333 A note of Mr. Drake s in his edition (1865) of Mr. Hubbard s history, cites original papers, then in his possession, as testimony against Capt. Scottow. The deposition of Michael Edgecombe, aged about 25 years, declares that he was at Blackpoint when the " nine Winter-harbour men were fighting the Indians upon the Sands opposite said Place, and saw sundrie men come to Mr. Scot- tow importuning that he would send some Ayde over to those poore distressed men," etc., and that Capt. Scottow, though seeing the English were far outnumbered by the Indians, and must be over come soon without releif, yet would not suffer a man to go to help them ; and one John Lux came and reproached the Captain and offered to take men in his shallop across the river and land them "on shoare in Little River," near where the men were fighting, and where all were found slain next day. This was sworn to before Brian Pendleton, July 20th, 1676. Lux declared that nothing would move Capt. Scottow, although he could see the men being overpowered by greatly outnumbering savages. Mr. Foxwell also deposed against Capt. Scottow s inhumanity in the affair of the burning of Dunstan, etc. Walter Gendall, who served as Sergeant under Capt. Scottow, and had charge of a body of soldiers at Spurwink in 1675, made a similar deposition. The Court referred this case to the October session, and then gave judgment, that, This Court, having heard the complaint of M r . Rishworth exhibbeted against Captaine Scottow, &c. . . . uppon a full hearing of both par ties, see no reason for the aforesaid complaint, and doe judge that the said Capt. Scottow ( for aught do thappeare) hath faithfully dischardged his trust, and is therefore acquitted from the chardge endeavo r d to be put on him, but that the same be borne by the county and that Mr. Rushworth do pay Capt. Scottow his costs and damage. The Court granted and determined the costs to be nine pounds, thirteen shillings & eight pence. In the evidence favorable to this decision, the following paper, found in the old files of Suffolk County Court, was probably offered : PETITION OF INHABITANTS OF SCARBOROUGH. The humble Petition of the Inhabitants of Scarborough. Whereas Mr. Scottow of Boston Stood by us in all our streights and distresses during the late Warr with the Indians and not only encouraged us with his presence from April until January last, but alsoe releived us with a barrell of powder and all sorts of ammunition as it cost him in Boston near to twenty pounds for which he is not yet paid, yea, then when as there was no town Stock nor a pound of powder in the Town that we know of without which supply we and our familyes must either have been destroyed or our town deserted as Casco and Saco were, we being then for divers months the seat of war and having more houses than one of the Townes and above double the other burnt and consumed : 334 KING PHILIP S WAR. and to keep us together since he hath this Spring helped us more with nere two hundred bushells of Indian and other Grain without which some of us could neither have planted nor sowne, some had ben pincht and others might have starved, in all things to our weak understanding he hath carryed it faithfully and carefully to the publicke interest, he being now unjustly and as far as we can deserne maliciously perse cuted by some especially one Mr. Foxwell a man noted for contention and whereas there be diverse oaths taken against s d Scottow some of them to the knowledge of some of us false, and others covered with fraude and fallacy we being much troubled that for his good he should receive a bill humbly crave that he may have all right and due encour agement and vindication, and your petitioners shall further humblie pray for your honors peace and prosperity. Henry Jocelyn Richard X Willing Thomas X Wasgate Ambrose Bouden Francis X White John X Makenny John X Libby, senior, John X Ficket Edward X Hounsell Sam X Oakman Richard X Bassen Richard X Barret John X Libby jun r Richard Moore Christopher X Picket Anthony Row Peter X Hinxen Thomas Cleverly Thomas X Bigford Henry X Elkins John X Vicars John Howell Henry X Brookins Dunken X Teshmond William X Champlin William X Burrage John X Simson ADDITIONAL FAVOURABLE TESTIMONY. These are to testifie before whom it may concern, that M r . Scottow of Boston, being w th us when y e men were killed upon Sacho Sands at the first heering of the guns fired there w th consent of M r . Josselin gave y e Alarum all over garrison to y e whole town, drew up such of us on our armes as were at home, dispatcht our Corporall to call in such as were abroad, as also the said Scottow was very Angry with Mack- shawine for saying that Captaine Wincoll and his Company were all cut off, telling him though some might be killed and the rest ffled yett it might be to gain y e advantage of ground as it proved, as also at the same time Scottow seartcht the armes and ammunition of us which were drawne up exchanging y e armes which were insufficient for his owne fflxed armes, and that hee supplied every man of all those that were sent forth, and wanted, both with powder, buletts, swan shott, biskett, and a dram of y e bottle out of his owne store, there not being at the same time one pound of powder in y e town, that wee know of but what they rec ved from Scottow & that the said Scottow, upon the first alarum enquire whether some of us might not bee sent in a shallop or in Canows to goe to y e releif of those men, it was answered that they could not be sent with safety neither for the men nor for their armes because of the gulf of y e sea, the wind blowing ffresh upon the shore. The said Scottow with the consent of Mr. Henery Josselin, did with as much possible speed as they could, dispatch away about twenty men over our fferry to march by land to the relief of that pty under y e charge of Serjeant Olliver, yea so many men did they send away that some of us complained against them saying they did not doe well to send out so many of their husbands and children, supposeing that if they should have been cutt off wee had not strength left at the garrison CAPT. SCOTTOW VINDICATED. 335 sufficient to defend o ur selves if assaulted, Yea, wee doe farther testifie that the said Scottow Acted therein to the utmost of his power soe that when some of the company manifested a backwardness to the relief above in vexation hee through his Kane upon the ground saying he would through up his Commission and never meddle more with it, and alsoe that wee could not answer to god, men, nor our owne consciences unless wee used the utmost of our endeavour to relieve those men, in testimony of the truth of what is above written we have hereunto signed and shall to the substance of the whole depose if called thereunto by lawfull Authority. Blackpoint, July y e 15 th 1676. The pmises above written, I John X Libby Sen r Rich. Willing attest to be truth given under Tomas X Bigford Andrew Browne my hand this 18 July 1676 Anthony row ffrancis X White HENRY JOCELYN. Thomas Cleverly Peter X Hinxen Hen: X Elkins Henry X Nookins Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 28. During August of 1676, Capt. Scottow was evidently at Boston, leaving the conduct of affairs to Jocelyn and Tippen with Walter Gendal as a third on the " committee of the militia." Sergeant Tippen, who appears to have been a very efficient officer, being called away also, the others found themselves unable to control the inhabitants who were acting as garrison soldiers, and they wrote this letter to Capt. Scottow : Capt. Joshua Scottow. We underwritten being of y e committee with Serjeant Tippen, and both of you now being absent, shall desire you to acquaint y e Governor & Councill of y e averseness of the generality of y e Inhabitants to obey Military orders ; y l they would be pleased to direct some especial order to such in this town as may bring y e Inhabitants to y e obedience of y e Military Laws of the Government y* we may be in some capacity to defend ourselves against y e common enemy ; and we shall remain, Y r friends to serve you Black Point, Aug. 9 th , 1676. HENRY JOCELYN, WALTER GENDALL. The Blackpoint garrison was recognized by the Indians as the strongest fortification in the Eastern Towns, and it had therefore escaped any assault in the general destruction which fell upon Casco and the Kennebec towns. In the letter of Capt. Hathorne in the last chapter, we find some account of the discontent of the people at Blackpoint and their determination to abandon the garrison and betake themselves to the safer towns to the West. The letter indicates also that Capt. Scottow was there when Capt. Hathorne visited the place, but evidently withdrew soon after ; as upon October 12th the Indians appeared at the garri son, a hundred strong, with the chief " Mugg " (or Mog Hegon, Whittier s Mog Megone) at their head ; they found the inhabi tants all within the fort and Mr. Jocelyn in command. The 336 KING PHILIP S WAR. Indians did not attack, knowing that even a small number could hold it against any assault they could make. Mugg was well acquainted with all the affairs of the English, and immediately sought a parley with Mr. Jocelyn, which lasted a long time. In the meantime all the inhabitants had taken the opportunity to get out of the house and to their boats and away to the West ward towns, Wells, Portsmouth, etc. How they could have thus effected their escape in the presence of so large a body of the enemy must be explained by the advantageous position of the garrison, and the overconfidence of the Indians. Mr. Jocelyn and his family were taken with the house and its contents, which was at once surrendered, when Mr. Jocelyn found only his own family left within. Mugg was highly elated with this great and easy success, and Jocelyn was treated kindly, and with his family soon restored to their friends. It is said that he afterwards removed to Plymouth, where he spent the rest of his days. Black- point garrison was not destroyed, perhaps because Mugg, in the flush of his success, believed the English would soon be driven from the country, and this would serve the Indians as a stronghold. The following paper, the original of which is preserved among the papers of the late Mr. Lemuel Shattuck, gives the list of those who were at Blackpoint just before the surrender : A list of y* names of y e Inhabitants at Blackpoint Garison Octo: 12 th 1676. Daniell Moore John Tenney in y Garison. Henry Brookin Nathaniell Willett Charles Browne Edward Hounsell Hampton and Sals- bery Soldiers ffrancis Sholet inyhuttew* Anthony Roe 8 onb y u t?oyt Thomas Bickford iDgtoit. Robert Tydey Richard Moore James Lybbey John Lybbey Samuell Lybbey Anthony Lybbey George Taylor James Ogleby Dunken Chessom William Sheildin John Vickers R^ Basson Living mu fr e .*y * Ro rt Eliott ffrancis White Richard Honywell John Howell Ralphe Heison Matthew Heyson Joseph Oliver Christopher Edgecome John Edgecome Micael Edgecome Robert Edgecome Living three Henry Elldns John Ashden Johne Warrick Goodman Luscome Tymothy Collins Andrew Browne, Senior Andrew Browne John Browne Joseph Browne William Burrage Ambrose Bouden, Con stable Tho: Gumming BLACKPOINT REGARRISONED. 337 John Herman Samuell Okeman, Senior Samuell Okeman ffrancis Shealett John Elson Edward Hounalow Peter Hmcson James Qglebey Symond Hincson RiCdWilUn Daniell Moore John Symson Tho: Cleauerly John Cocke A list of y names of those y ware prest by Vertue of Capt. Harthornes order to be for y service of y Oarison of y Inhabitants afforesaid. John Cocke Dunken Chesson Richard Burrough "William Burraare R rd Burrough It is probable that the surrender of the fort at Blackpoint was a great surprise to Capt. Scottow, as it was considered by all absolutely secure, and was at the time well supplied and amply garrisoned ; doubtless the cause of the desertion was the long- suppressed discontent of the people, and their panic at the approach of the large body of Indians which their fears magnified to an army. Capt. Scottow did not rest content with his defeat, however, as we see by the following item at the session of the General Court, October 25, 1676, some twelve days after the disaster. Whereas Joshua Scottow is now sending forth a smale vessell or two w th company for the discovery of the state of the fort at Black Point, and transport of what may be there recoverable either of his or any of the inhabitants, it is ordered, that the said vessells and persons by him sent shall be & hereby are exempted from impresse upon any of the country 8 imploy ; and Bartholomew Tipping being commended as a fitt person to take the charge of such as are to land, in case he shall judge the place tenable, he shallbe & hereby is impowerad to impresse the company now sent, and any other of the inhabitants, or any other persons which maybe there found, to looke after plunder or their owne estates, and to defend & keepe the place from the enemy untill further order ; and the said Scottow hath liberty to impresse some inhabitants of Black Point who lye latent, he, the said Scottow, carrying it on at his oune charge. Sometime in November, Mugg having surrendered himself and the Indians having withdrawn, Capt. Scottow regained his fort, and Sergt. Bartholomew Tippen and soldiers, and many of the inhabitants, remained there, and more returned in the Spring. While our eastern towns from Portsmouth to Saco were kept in constant fear by frequent attacks by skulking bands, Blackpoint was not troubled until May 13th, 1677, when a great body of the enemy appeared before the garrison, and at once made a resolute onset upon it, apparently feeling assured of victory. But they had now to deal with a different man than before ; Sergt. Barthol- 338 KING PHILIP S WAR. omew Tippen was now in command, and conducted a gallant de fence during three days, in which time but three of his soldiers were killed ; on the 16th the Sergeant himself made a fine shot, by which one of the leaders (supposed, at the time, to be " Simon, " but afterwards found to be the celebrated " Mugg ") fell, by which loss of their chief they were so disheartened that they withdrew, part towards the Kennebec, the rest toward Piscataqua and York, where they did some injury, of which and their next attack upon Blackpoint, the next chapter, taking up the opera tions of Capt. Benjamin Swett, will give some account. Credited under Capt. Scottow. January 25 1675-6 Samuel Ryall 01 01 04 Daniel Lancton, Corp l 04 04 00 Eben Ingolsby 03 12 00 George Gregory 03 12 00 Moses Richardson 03 12 00 John Newman 03 12 00 Henry Berrisford 03 12 00 Roger Jones 03 12 00 Charles Duckworth 03 12 00 Andrew Cload 03 12 00 Owen Jones 03 12 00 Thomas Hobson 03 12 00 William Howard 03 12 00 John Slead 03 12 00 Benjamin Wardall 03 12 00 Thomas Skellito 03 12 00 Thomas Hawes 03 12 00 John Newton 03 12 00 Samuel Walker 03 12 00 Alexander Johnson 03 12 00 February 19, 1675-6 Bartholomew Tippin 03 12 00 Thomas Barber 02 08 00 Nathaniel Willett 02 08 00 Edward Milton 02 08 00 Robert Tydye 02 08 00 Ebenezer Winter 02 08 00 Peter Odrigoe 02 08 00 Samuel Johnson 02 08 00 John Baker 02 08 00 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Timothy Cunnell John Lowell Ezekiel Hamlin Peter Mallandy Thomas Maddis James Ogleby James Barber Richard Huneywell William Darby Samuel Baker March 24 th 1675-6 Samuel Johnson 02 April 24, 1676 Thomas Barber 03 Peter Malardino 03 June 24, 1676 John Baker 04 Bartholomew Tippin 09 Thomas Barber 02 Peter Odrego 01 Francis Sholett 06 Timothy Conhill 06 Nathaniel Willet 06 Edward Milton 02 James Barber 06 Peter Odrego 05 James Ogleby 06 Thomas Maddis 06 William Darby 06 Robert Tidy 06 Ebenezer Winter 06 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 08 00 14 00 18 00 09 04 16 00 09 00 02 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 08 00 00 12 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 There were doubtless many names credited during the autumn and winter of 1676-7, but the accounts covering that period are now lost. It will be noted, however, that many of the same names appear in this following list from a later book that are in the former. The accounts between these dates are lost. CAPT. SCOTTOW S SOLDIERS. 339 July 24, 1677. Edward Cowle Sam. Libby John Starts August 1 st 1677 Henry Libby September John Gibson Will: Burridg Nath 1 Willet John Robin John Starts James Ogleby Richard Barrett Christopher Edgecomb Robert Edgecomb Sam 1 Jordan John Markany John Churchill Michael Edgecomb Thos: Cummings Thos: Irons Anthony Libby October. John Courser Lewis Price Andrew Brown John Brown John Augur John Lewis Thos: Rogers John Bezoon November. Edward Hounsel December. Job Tooky Joseph Hide January 1677-8 David Middleton Andrew Johnson February 1677-8 William Milles Henery Libby March 1677-8 Thos: Bull Sam 1 Jordan Richard Honywell Nathaniell Willitt John Browne Stephen Wolfe Ambross Bowden Michael Edgecomb John Tinuey Rich d Honywell Will: Smith In October, 1677, upon the petition of Capt. Scottow and others of his townsmen, all the arms and ammunition then in the fort at Blackpoint were granted them for their proper defence, the same or like amount to be returned upon the order of the Court, and the inhabitants, while engaged in the defence of the garrison, were freed from all country rates. After the close of the war Capt. Scottow returned and engaged in the development of his estate, and in building up the interests of the settlement. In 1679 he was chosen an Associate for York County. In 1681 the inhabitants at Blackpoint accepted his offer to give the town a hundred acres of land " upon the Plains between Moors Brook and the South East end of the Great Pond," as a site for the building of a fortification for the defence of the town. The land about this fort was to be laid out in lots con venient for the most compact settlement of the people, all of whom were to build upon these and pay to Capt. Scottow one shilling yearly for ever as being their " demesne Lord." The people took hold with a will, and all working together soon erected a very large and strong fortification. Here the people lived, apparently in harmony, until 1686, when for some reason they declared their agreement with Capt. Scottow " null and void," but at the same time were ready enough to use the protection of his garrison in times of danger ; and their opposition to him, on this as well as former occasions, is strange from our standpoint, and must probably remain unaccounted for, except for the reasons above noted, and perhaps arbitrary and eccentric manners, of which some intimations may be gathered from the petitions of his friends noted above, as well as from his writings. The people never forgot the old charge of his being the indirect cause of the 340 KING PHILIP S WAR. death of the Nicholses in 1675 ; and in 1681 he was accused of the murder of one Nathan Bedford, who was shown at the inquest to have been drowned, and the charge was probably due to the hostility of his enemies. He still held his leading position at Blackpoint until the evacuation in May, 1690, when he retired to Boston where he probably spent the rest of his days. He died January 20th, 1698, aged 83 years. His gravestone was found, October, 1850, in the tower of " The Old South Church," by workmen making repairs upon the wall under the north dial, some fifty feet from the ground. How it came there is not, I be lieve, yet explained. Another stone, that of William Middleton, died 1699, was found at the same time and place. Mr. Sewall, in his Journal, Jan. 21 st and 22 d , 1697-8, writes : It seems Capt Scottow died last night. Thus the New England men drop away." Jan. 22 ; " Capt Joshua Scottow is buried in the old burying place : Bearers Maj or Gen 1 Winthrop, Mr. Cook, Col. Hutchinson, Sewall, Sergeant, Walley : Extream Cold. No Minister at Capt. Scottow s Funeral nor wife nor daughter." Capt. Scottow was the author of two very curious tracts, one in 1691, entitled, " Old Men s Tears for their own Declensions mixed with Fears of their and posterities further falling off from New England s Primitive Constitution. Published by some of Bos ton s Old Planters and some others. " Another tract, published in 1694, has a title similar in character, but too long for insertion here except the first part, " A Narrative of the Planting of the Massachusetts Colony Anno 1628," etc. Besides these tracts there are many intimations of eccentricity in the character of Mr. Scottow. See " Memoir of Joshua Scottow," by Hon. Hamilton A. Hill, A.M. Also Sibley s " Harvard Graduates." The accounts of Capt. Scottow for disbursements during the war were still unsettled in 1685, when the amount claimed was over two hundred pounds ; the Court that year voted him a grant of five hundred acres of land in the " Province of Mayne in any free place ; " and in 1686, some delay and trouble about this former grant having arisen, he was granted five hundred acres in addition in same place and under the same conditions. Capt. Scottow left numerous descendants, by his daughters ; in his will, probated March 3d, 1698, he mentions sixteen grand children. Thomas Scottow, only surviving son of the Captain, after graduating at Harvard in 1677, seems to have associated himself with his father ; he was Recorder of York County in 1686, and signs as Deputy Register, after that until 1688. In his father s will he is bequeathed a double portion, which, if he dies without issue, shall go to his sister Elizabeth Savage. In Mr. Waters s " Genealogical Gleanings," Part I., page 210, is found Thomas Scottow s will, which declares him to be " of Boston, THOMAS SCOTTOW. 341 Chirurgeon, now bound forth to sea in the Ship Gerrard of Lon don, Capt. William Dennis, commander, 14 November 1698," proved 4 September, 1699. Gives his sister, Elizabeth Savage, of New England, all his real and personal estate in New Eng land. To his " loving friend Margaret Softley of the Parish of St. Paul, Shadwell, in the County of Middlesex, widow," all his goods and chattels and estate in the said ship, and all wages that may be due him for service on the said ship at the time of his death, in satisfaction of what he shall owe her, at his death. He appoints her executrix. XXIV. CAPT. BENJAMIN SWETT AND HIS MEN, AND CAPT. MICHAEL PEIRSE OF PLYMOUTH COLONY. JOHN ! SWETT, admitted freeman of Massachusetts Colony May 18, 1642, was one of the ninety-one freeholders who were declared to be the proprietors of all commons, waste lands and rivers undisposed of in the town of Newbury. CAPT. BENJAMIN 2 SWETT, son of John, 1 was born in England about 1626 ; came to Newbury with his father ; married there, November, 1647, Hester, daughter of Peter Weare. They settled first in Newbury, and from 1655 to 1662, in company with his brother-in-law, Nathaniel Weare, he carried on the farm of Mr. John Woodbridge of Newbury. His children, born in New bury, were Hester, 3 7 June, 1648, m. Abin Greene, 1668 ; Sarah, 3 7 November, 1650, m. Morris Hobbs, 1678 ; Mary, 3 7 January, 1652, died soon ; Mary, 3 2 May, 1654 ; Benjamin, 3 5 August, 1656 ; Joseph, 3 21 January, 1659 ; Moses, 3 16 September, 1661. And in Hampton, whither he removed about 1663, were born, Hannah, 3 16 May, 1664 ; Elizabeth, 3 2 July, 1667 ; John, 3 17 May, 1670 ; Stephen, 3 13 September, 1672 ; and perhaps another. Capt. Swett was active and energetic. He was early chosen to fill places of trust in town and county. But he was inclined to military exercises, and was chosen Ensign of the military com pany in Newbury as early as 1651. After removing to Hampton, he became prominent and influ ential in both civil and military affairs in Old Norfolk County ; and in the well preserved and finely written document (Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 57) presented to the General Court, May 31, 1671, remonstrating against the Court s appointment of Robert Pike, as Sergeant-Major of Norfolk County, instead of leaving the choice to the people, we doubtless see Capt. Swett s elegant handwriting ; and he seems to be the recognized leader among the prominent men of the various towns of Norfolk. In 1675 he held the rank of Lieutenant, and is mentioned thus by Mr. Hubbard, as marching up with a small company into the woods to recover the body of Goodman Robinson of Exeter, killed by the Indians. And the first official notice I have found is the order of Council, January 17, 1675-6, mentioned hereto- CAPT. SWETT S COMMISSION. 343 fore, showing that he was in charge of recruits then being sent out to Narraganset. February 1, 1675-6, the Council by special order granted him three pounds for the time he had been in the service ; this was probably for his services in recruiting. Feb ruary 29, 1675-6, he was credited under Capt. Gardiner with X3. OOs. OOd. on the treasurer s book, possibly the same item. More than half the men credited under him assigned their credits to the town of Haverhill, and I find were nearly all in habitants of that town. The service for which these credits are given was probably rendered in the spring of 1676, upon the frontier towns of Essex County. Captain Swett was then en gaged at home, and was in command of the military at Hampton and vicinity until the next year, when he was called into the public service at the Eastward, which the following Order and Commission of the Council will explain : Ordered that Leiftenant Benjamin Swett have a Commission for a Captains place & that he be the Conduct & chiefe of Commanders of the English & Indian forces now raysed & to Goe forth on the Service of the Country ag l the Eastern Indian Ennemy as also to order and dispose of the masters & marines & vessels now Going to said service for the better management of that affayre. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 132. CAPT. SWETT S COMMISSION. Capt. Swett, You are ordered with the forces now raysed & by your Commission put under your Command to repayr to Blackpoynt & there use all possible diligence by searching & otherwise to understand the state & motions of the enemy & with your force to assayle & annoy them as much as in you lyeth. If y e Headquarters of the Enemy by advice of Major Clark & those upon the place be possible to be assaulted you are ordered to mai ch thither with all your force ; if any other small quarter of the enemy lye near & your force be in any Measure Capable in a short time to visit and fall upon them you are accordingly with all y e force Indians & English to make your march thither & assalt them ; if otherwise no service against the enemy offer advising with Major Clark to whom the Councill doth refer you for advice, you shall with your whole force march down towards Pascataq, on the Backside of winter Harbor, Wels, york &c, if possible to dis cover the lurking places of y e enemy & fall upon them after which you shall supply, out of your company y c places of y old garrison soldiers which went out under C. Swayne or other dismissing them home & lodge y c remayners in most convenient and necessary places for the Countryes Service & in such Companyes that upon prime exigent or order you may call y m again forth on further excursion or expedition keeping good correspondence giving account to ye Governor & Council of all occurrences. Dated at Charlestown y 6 22 d of June, 1677 pr. Council. E. R. S ty . To be released, Sam". Clark, Isaak How, W m . Hopkins, W ra . Stanley, Moses Whitney. 344 KING PHILIP S WAR. This final service of Capt. Swett is best told by Mr. Hubbard, the historian of the war, who, after telling of the late depreda tions which had been made at York, Wells and Hampton, where Edward Colcord, Jr., and three others (probably Abraham Per kins, Jr., Benjamin Hillard and Caleb Towle) were killed, con tinues : The Indians thus making daily Inroads upon these weak, unfenced places, the Governor and Council resolved to raise new Forces, and having had good Experience of the Faithfulness and Valor of the Christian Indians about Natick, armed two hundred of them and sent them together with forty English, to prosecute the Quarrel against those Eastward Indians to the full; but not judging aright of the Number of the Enemy, they much underdid then* Business, for besides that the Number they sent of the English was a great deal too small, those that were chosen this Bout to take their Turns in the Service Abroad, were many of them young, raw, and unexperienced Soldiers, who were not able to look Danger, much less Death, in the Face, in cool Blood, by which means it came to pass that the Enterprise suc ceeded so ill ; for Captain Swett with Lieutenant Richardson, that was sent with him to command the friendly Indians, coming to Black Point, June 28th, he began to try the Valor and Courage of his Company before he had disciplined them, or had any Experience of their Ability to fight. The very next morning after he had landed his men, under standing by his Scouts that many of the Enemies were up and down upon the Place, he made too much Haste to fall upon them, and not mistrusting their Number, while he was marching up the Edge of an Hill with one Party, and his Lieutenant with another, the Indians, that had hid themselves in the Swamp on each Side of the Hill, suddenly fired upon the English on both Sides, which not a little discouraged his young and undisciplined Company, so as they could not, or did not keep their Ranks, but while some were ready to run and shift for them selves, the Captain strived to keep them together, to bring off the dead and wounded men, so long that he brought himself and all the Company in Danger of an utter Overthrow, which soon after took place ; for the poor unskilful Soldiers, being scattered, were shifting for themselves, while a few resolute Men of Courage bore the Brunt of the Service till they were in a Manner all knocked down. The Lieutenant was killed soon after the first Onset ; the Captain having received near twenty Wounds, yet still held out defending and encourag ing his Men, till he was surrounded with more of his enemies than he was able to grapple with, and so was at the last barbarously murdered by them within a little of the Garrison-house. There were slain at this Time somewhat above forty of the English, and twelve of the friendly Indians that assisted, very few escaping but were either killed right out or dangerously wounded. It is to be regretted that the names of very few of all who fell in this disastrous encounter have been preserved. Besides Capt. Swett and Lieut. Richardson, the records of Andover give the names of four who went from that town who were killed, John CAPT. SWETT AT BLACKPOINT. 345 Parker, James Parker, John Phelps and Daniel Blanchard; and I have not been able to find any further names elsewhere. Mr. G. A. Churchill, in his researches, has found that Benjamin Rock- wood was of this company, and still living in 1742. The journal of the treasurer covering this period is lost. It seems from all available references that about ninety English and Indians, under Capt. Swett and Lieut. James Richardson, were engaged in the fight at Blackpoint; but the number of Indians given by Mr. Hubbard as in the expedition is not confirmed by other evidence. In Major Daniel Gookin s " History of the Christian Indians," he says : In Jane, 1677, another expedition into the Eastern parts, among whom were about 36 of our Christian Indians, who were in a fight near Black point ; the English lost about forty men whereof were eight of our friendly Indians, the greatest loss our [Christian] Indians sus tained all the war. This seems to imply that the eight Indians are a part of the forty that were slain, and also that but thirty-six Indians were in the command. The instructions given in making up the force of his Lieutenant also give additional light. Order of the Council, June 15th, 1677. It is reffered to Major Gookin forthwith to Suply Leift. Richardson & his p ty at Chelmsford with provision Ammunition & app 1 necessary & to order him to scout & range y e woods between Merrimack & Pas- catawq River & endeavour to kill and sease y e Lurking enemy in those parts for w ch the Major is ordered to encourage y m w 01 a reward of twenty shillings for every scalpe & forty shillings for every prisoner or y c prisoner. And also to make up in number 25 men, & to order y m after some time spent there, to m r ch to Blackpoint garison & Their to bee at y e ordering of Liftenant Tipping until further order from the Council the time of Randevous at Blackpoint is to bee the 26 of this Instant June if possible. Past. EDWD RAWSON, Secretary. Mass. Archives, vol. 69, p. 129. If these instructions were carried out, Lieut. Richardson and his Indians from Chelmsford marched overland to Blackpoint, and evidently arrived there before the hostile Indians had come from the Kermebec and Androscoggin. The vessels were a day behind the appointed time in arriving. In making up his force for scouting the woods from Blackpoint to Saco, and in the vicinity, Capt. Swett had no thought of the large numbers of the enemy that were actually near them ; so that when he had drawn out his English to the number of forty, and his Lieu tenant s force of thirty-six, and some of the Blackpoint men of Sergt. Tippen s command joined, he mustered in all a com- 346 KING PHILIP S WAR. pany of ninety. It is said that a large decoy body of the enemy showed themselves and succeeded in drawing both the commands into an ambush contrived with their usual cunning, and blindly walked into, in the usual manner of the English from the first ; and the story of " Bloody-Brook," " Beers Plain," " Brookfield " and "Sudbury," is again repeated, and the simple old Indian de vice of decoy and ambush again overwhelms our forces and sends dismay through all the colonies. But the Indians never risked a battle on any other chance ; and if their device had not succeeded here, would doubtless have disappeared, and the report would have been that our forces "could not come up with them." As it was, the Indians made no further attempt at that time, and probably suffered severely in the running fight, of which no details have been handed down. The Indians withdrew at the time, but in July following began the depredations upon the fishermen along the Eastern coast, and by midsummer had captured no less than thirteen vessels from Salem alone. They soon abandoned this enterprise, however, as they could not manage any craft that could not be worked with paddles. About this time, Governor Andros, of New York, interfered, and sent a vessel with a force to Pemaquid and vicinity and effected a cessation of hostilities. LIEUT. JAMES RICHARDSON was first of Woburn, but in 1659 removed to Chelmsford, and there married, November 28, 1660, Bridget Henchman, daughter of Thomas, and by her had eight children or more. He was with Capt. Wheeler in the defence of Brookfield, and with Simon Davis, of Concord, and John Fiske, was appointed by the Captain, who was disabled by his wounds, to manage the defence. He was afterwards active in the war; removed to Charlestown, May 1, 1676, and served as Lieutenant with Capt. Samuel Hunting in his mixed English and Indian company in the summer and fall of that year at Pawtucket Falls (now Lowell), where they built a fortification and maintained a garrison, of which Lieut. Richardson was left in charge as well as of the Christian Indians at Chelmsford. He was well acquainted with Indian ways, and had great influence with them. Credited under Lieut. Benjamin Swett. June 24 th , 1676. Thomas Hartshorn 00 12 00 Samuel Hutckins 02 04 06 Nathaniel Hazeltine 01 00 06 Samuel Aires 00 08 06 John Keizer 00 08 06 John Clement 00 08 06 Philip Esman 00 15 04 Benjamin Singleterry 00 15 04 Thomas Durston 00 17 10 Thomas Eastman 01 04 00 Thomas Allin 01 17 06 Henry Kemball 01 09 04 Benjamin Greely 01 00 06 Jonathan Henrick 00 15 04 John Corly 00 15 04 John Roby 00 08 06 Thomas Kingsby 02 04 04 Robert Swan 01 04 00 John Hazletine 01 04 00 Samuel Watts 00 13 06 Joseph Bond 00 13 06 CAPT. MICHAEL PEIRSE, OF SCITUATE. 347 James Smith 05 08 00 Denis Sihy 04 01 00 John Cann 02 14 00 Benjamin Allin 02 00 10 JohnWinslow 02 14 10 Benjamin Dyer 02 14 00 John Coarser 02 14 00 John Hicks 01 00 06 John Plimpton 02 14 00 John Ross 02 14 00 William Burt 00 09 04 John Norton 02 07 00 Rich. Hawkins 02 14 10 John Veales 02 01 00 William Philips 02 14 00 James Franklin 02 14 00 Thomas Davis 02 14 00 Samuel Davis 03 03 00 James Wamsly 02 14 00 Frances Burges 02 14 00 It will be noticed that the above credits are given a year before this final service, for which I have not as yet found any credit anywhere recorded. CAPT. MICHAEL PEIRSE AND HIS COMPANY, OF PLYMOUTH COLONY. Michael Peirse, or Peirce, was of Hingham from 1646 to 1663, but removed to Scituate soon after. His children, named in his will of 1675, just before going to the war, were Persis, Benjamin, John, Ephraim, Elizabeth, Deborah, Ann, Abia and Ruth. His first wife died in 1662, and he married a second wife, Ann, at Scituate. Hon. Henry B. Peirce, late Secretary of State of Mas sachusetts, is a lineal descendant of Capt. Michael Peirse. Michael Peirse was appointed ensign of a company raised in Plymouth Colony to go against the Dutch, in December, 1673, and captain of the company raised in the spring of 1675-6 as hereinafter told. It may be said here that as this was a Plymouth Colony Company, the lists of credits of the Treasurer, which are nearly complete for Massachusetts Colony, are not found as yet in Plymouth or Connecticut, so that we have to depend upon chance lists found here and there, and the lists of " Narraganset Grantees," published in full for the first time in this volume - We have learned above of the general situation of affairs in Mas sachusetts Colony, in March, 1676. The intention of the Indians was evidently to distract the at tention of the English by striking heavy blows in distant parts of the colonies. Connecticut was protected by the presence of the Mohegins and Pequods, whom the hostile Indians dreaded far more than the English, as they were their equals in woodcraft and Indian tactics. After the attack upon Medfield, the attack ing party advanced into Plymouth Colony, and probably formed a junction with another body, doubtless with the purpose of con centrating a great force upon some of the larger towns, while smaller bodies kept making demonstrations here and there upon some smaller places. On February 25th, they assaulted Wey- mouth, and burned seven or eight houses and barns. On March 12th they pushed even into Plymouth town, and destroyed 348 KING PHILIP S WAB. Clark s Garrison House, about two miles from Plymouth village, with eleven persons within it, plundered the provisions, a quan tity of ammunition, and quite a sum of money, without a single man lost or wounded. Another party suddenly assaulted War wick on March 16th or 17th, and destroyed nearly all the houses, though the people escaped. Nearly all the detached houses in the Narraganset country were attacked and destroyed within a few weeks, and many of the large towns were threatened. Plymouth Colony, on February 8, 1675-6, had ordered a com pany of men to be impressed from the southern towns of the colony, and on the 29th the Council ordered " that the Souldiers now under Presse, from the Southern Towns, be at Plymouth on Wednesday the 8th of this Instant (March) in order unto a further March, and with them 20 or 30 of the Southern Indians, whoe together with the other whoe are under Presse to goe forth under the Command of Captain Michael Peirse and Lieftenant Samuell Fuller." The force probably got ready sometime in the middle of March. " Capt. Amos," a Wampanoag Indian who refused to follow with Philip and joined the friendly Indians, was in command of the Cape Indians in Capt. Peirse s company, and also acted as guide to the whole force. The command marched to Seekonk, where they arrived March 25th, and that day had a skirmish with a party of Indians in the vicinity, whom they pursued until night and supposed they had seriously dam aged. Retiring to the Garrison House at Seekonk that night, early on the next day, Sunday, March 26th, the forces, increased by several from Seekonk as guides, started again in pursuit of the enemy ; and soon came across a few Indians who showed themselves in the distance and seemed to be trying to get away, but to be impeded by lameness. The English as usual were lured to rush forward, and in spite of former experiences and the warnings of the Indian allies, they soon found themselves in an ambuscade. Though not taken entirely by surprise by the old trick, which he believed his company was strong enough to fight through, Capt. Peirse was entirely deceived by the numbers of the Indians. He was a brave officer, and supposing he had a large body, perhaps twice his own number, at bay, he fearlessly attacked them even at great disadvantage. The Indians did not discover their full numbers until they had drawn the English across a small river, to some distance, when the attempt was evidently made to surround him. This forced him back upon the bank of the river, where he found himself attacked in the rear by a large party sent to cut him off. There is no doubt that Capt. Peirse was out-generalled, as well as vastly out numbered, and, like the brave man that he was, he fought it out till he fell, with his brave men around him. Before leaving the garrison in the morning Capt. Peirse had sent a messenger to Capt. Edmunds of Providence, asking him to cooperate in an CAPT. PEIRSE S COMPANY DESTROYED. 349 attack upon a large body of Indians then at Pawtucket Falls ; the messenger, however, did not deliver his message until after the morning service (it being Sunday), when Capt. Edmunds indignantly berated him, declaring that it was then too late, as it proved. It is doubtful if a company from Providence could have saved Capt. Peirse and his men after they crossed the river, as with their great numbers the Indians were able to beset every approach to the battle-field, and choose their ground. It is doubtful if during the war the English had come face to face in the open field with so large and so well-organized a force of the Indians. Canonchet doubtless directed the operations in this campaign in person, and was assisted by the ablest chiefs and the best warriors, picked from all the tribes. It was a signal victory for the Indians, and it confirmed Canonchet as the mili tary leader before all others. Great stores of corn had been opened up and sent northward, with the plunder from the assaulted towns ; heavy blows had been struck against the towns ; the non-combatants, the infirm and helpless were safe in the vast forests stretching from beyond Quabaog to Canada, and were guarded by a strong reserve. He with his stout chiefs and their bands of loyal warriors were therefore free to carry the war into all parts of the colonies ; the great expedition under Major Savage against Menameset, etc., had been completely frustrated, and now this brilliant victory, as they counted it, had carried terror and dismay to the southern towns. Canonchet may well have dreamed of reconquering his native dominions, and doubtless believed that he could now reestablish his people there. Fearless by nature, and feeling secure from invasion, he was waiting, at his headquarters not far from Pawtucket, with but few guards, having out large scouting parties scouring the country ; and a very large part of his force had doubtless gone to the northward, with forage, plunder, and the dead and wounded from the battle with Capt. Peirse, of whom the number was probably more than one hundred. The loss on the part of the English was fifty- two of the English and eleven of the friendly Indians. From the letter of Rev. Noah Newman, of Rehoboth, written the day after the battle, we get the names of those killed of Capt. Peirse s company. From Scituate, 15 Slain. Capt. Pierce, Samuel Russell, Benjamin Chittenden, John Lothrope, Gershom Dodson, Samuel Pratt, Thomas Savery, Joseph Wade, William Wilcome, Jeremiah Barstow, John Ensign, Joseph Cowen, Joseph Perry, John Rowse, ? Marshfield, 9 Slain. Thomas Little, John Earns, Joseph White, John Burrows, Joseph Phillips, Samuel Bump, John Low, More ? John Brance. 350 KING PHILIP S WAR. Duxbury, 4 Slain. John Sprague, Benjamin Soal, Thomas Hunt, Joshua Fobes. Sandwich, 5 Slain. Benjamin Nye, Daniel Bessey, Caleb Blake, John Gibbs, Stephen Wing. Barnstable, 6 Slain. Lieut. Fuller, John Lewis, Eleazer Clapp, Samuel Linnet, Samuel Childs, Samuel Bereman. Yarmouth, 5 Slain. John Mathews, John Gage, William Gage, Henry Gage, Henry Gold. Eastham, 3 Slain. Joseph Nessefield, John Walker, John M . [Rehoboth?], 2 Slain. John Fitz, Jr., John Miller, Jr. The paper is much worn and mutilated, so that the names of several are lost. It is said that Miller and Fitz were of Reho both, and probably others. Seven or eight names are needed, in addition, to make up the fifty-five. In a chart of the descendants of John Read of Rehoboth, pub lished by Orin Read of Providence in 1859, it is stated that John Read s second son, John Read, Jr., was one of the Rehoboth sol diers killed in this fight. XXV. BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THE DESTRUCTION OF LAN CASTER, AND NAMES CREDITED WITH MILITARY SERVICE AT THE VARIOUS OTHER GARRISONS. OF the many garrisons occupied by the English during the war, the importance varied according to the movements of the army. Marlborough, for instance, was, during the most of the war, a rendezvous and general headquarters, and thus it was necessary to devote an entire chapter to that, and the operations thereabout. Mendon, Brookfield, Hadley, Northamp ton and several others later, like Scarborough and Wells, became prominent by their position as frontiers, or as supply and recruit ing stations. It will be understood that these items of credit occur in the Treasurer s book mixed with other credits under the various officers, etc., and not consecutively, as presented here. These garrisons are arranged alphabetically by names of places, for the convenience of the reader ; and for the same reason, two lists already given in previous chapters are reprinted here. The Lancaster garrison is an exception to the above rule, as it seems to demand a, fuller notice. The Nashaway Indians were the native inhabitants of the country bordering upon the Nashua river. The name of the sachem of this tribe, at the first settlement by the English, was Nashacowam, alias Nashoonan, alias Sholan. The bounds of his dominion are not exactly defined. His death is recorded in 1654. The first settlement by the English was begun with the estab lishment of a trucking-house, in 1643, by Henry Symonds and Thomas King. In 1675 it was one of the most prosperous of the inland plantations. Up to the opening of Philip s war, there had never been any serious trouble with the Nashaway Indians. In common with other tribes they were stirred up by the agents of Philip, and during the fall and winter of 1675 and 76 were doubtless actively engaged with the hostiles. Shoshanim, whom the English called " Sam Sachem," was sagamore of the tribe at this time. The story of the attacks upon Lancaster has been told elsewhere, except the first, which occurred on Sunday, August 20, 1675. This was five days after Capt. Mosely had marched his company into the town. This attack was a sudden raid of a 352 KING PHILIP S WAR. large party of Indians, led by a Nipmuck chief named Monoco, or "One-eyed John." The point of attack was the house of a Scotch settler, Mordecai Macloud, at the North end of the town, near what is now the North Cemetery. Seven persons were killed at this time, viz., Mordecai Macloud and his wife Lydia, a daughter Hannah, aged four years, and an infant child ; also George Bennet, who left a widow and five small children ; Jacob Farrar, Jr., who left a widow and four children ; and two men, Joseph Wheeler and William Flagg, probably detailed as guards to the house. After this bloody affair, the people were gathered into garrison-houses, and strong guards placed about for a time. Several friendly Indians, in the employ of the Council at Boston, went among the hostile Indians about Brookfield and Wachuset as spies, and one of these, James Quanapohit, January 24, 1675- 6, brought home to the Council a full and detailed report of the plan of the hostiles for the destruction of Lancaster, and even the day appointed. But the authorities paid little heed to his story. The Lancaster people, however, became alarmed, and appealed to the Council for assistance, which was being tardily attended to when the blow fell, just as predicted by James, and told by Job Kattenanit, another Christian Indian spy, who suc ceeded in escaping from the hostiles at Meminimisset, and, travelling upon snow-shoes eighty miles, came to Major Gookin s house, on January 9th, in a nearly famished condition, and re ported that a party of four hundred Indians were already on the way to destroy Lancaster. Major Gookin immediately arose upon this alarm, and consulting with Mr. Danforth, a member of the council, messengers were at once despatched to Marlborough, Concord and Lancaster, to fortify the town with all speed. The messenger reached Marlborough at daybreak, and Capt. Wads- worth marched away with a company of forty men. Before they arrived at Lancaster, the enemy had burned the bridge, by the regular road ; but the guides conducted them by another way so that they were able to escape the ambush laid for them by the enemy, and hastily repairing a partially burned bridge, they suc ceeded in driving off a party already attacking the garrison- house of Mr. Cyprian Stevens, and in saving that, and a part of the town from destruction, as heretofore mentioned. Another garrison-house, that of Rev. Joseph Rowlandson, the minister, was assaulted and burned, and of all the thirty-seven persons with in it, only one escaped death or captivity ; some authorities at the time gave the number as forty-two, but the most reliable says thirty-seven. Rev. Mr. Rowlandson was at Boston, trying to secure a force sufficient to protect the town from the threatened attack. From Mr. H. S. Nourse s " Early Records of Lancaster " I take the following list, which is probably the most complete and cor rect now obtainable : CAPTIVES AND SLAIN AT LANCASTER. 353 A List of those killed and made captive at the Rowlandson garrison- house in Lancaster, Feb y 10, 1675-6. KILLED IN THE ASSAULT. Ensign John Divoll, Josiah Divoll, John s son, aged 7. Daniel Gains. Abraham Joslin, aged 26. John MacLoud. Thomas Rowlandson, aged 19. John Kettle, aged 36. John Kettle jr. Joseph Kettle, son of John, aged 10. Mrs. Elizabeth Kerley, wife of Lieut. Henry. William Kerley, son of Lieut. Henry, aged 17. Joseph Kerley, son of Lieut. Henry, aged 7. Mrs. Priscilla Roper, wife of Ephriam. Priscilla, child of Ephriam, aged 3. CARRIED AWAY CAPTIVE. Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, wife of the minister, ransomed. Mary Rowlandson, daughter of the minister, aged 10, ransomed. Sarah Rowlandson, " " " " " 6, wounded & died Feb. 18. Joseph Rowlandson, son " " " " 13, ransomed. Mrs. Hannah Divoll, wife of Ensign John, ransomed. John Divoll, son of Ensign John, aged 12, died in captivity? William Divoll, son of " " " 4, ransomed. Hannah Divoll, daughter of" " " 9, died in captivity? Mrs. Ann Joslin, wife of Abraham, killed in captivity. Beatrice Joslin, dau. " " " " " Joseph Joslin, brother of " aged 18. Henry Kerley, son of Lieut. Henry, aged 18. Hannah Kerley, dau. " u " " 13. Mary Kerley, " " " " " 10. Martha Kerley, " " " " " 4. A Kerley child, " " " name and age unknown. Mrs. Elizabeth Kettle, wife of John, ransomed. Sarah Kettle, daughter " " aged 14, escaped. Jonathan Kettle, son " " aged 5. A Kettle child, a daughter " " Ephraim Roper escaped during the assault. OTHERS KILLED OR TAKEN OUTSIDE THE GARRISON, IN THE SOUTH PART OF THE TOWN. John Ball, Elizabeth his wife, and their infant child. Jonas Fairbank, and Joshua his son, aged 15. Henry Farrar, Ephraim Sawyer, aged 26, and Richard Wheeler. A man mentioned by Mrs. Rowlandson, but no name given. TAKEN CAPTIVE. Two of the family of John Ball, names unknown. Mrs. Rowlandson says that " of thirty-seven persons who were 354 KING PHILIP S WAK. in this one house, none escaped either present death or a bitter captivity, save only one." This one was Ephraim Roper, above- mentioned. Mrs. Rowlandson must be considered the very highest au thority, as she was a part of the story, which she afterwards published, and which affords almost the only reliable information we have of the condition, plans and movements of the hostile Indians, during that dreadful winter of 1675-6. Her story is simply, yet graphically, told, and we learn many things about the habits and customs of the Indians, their ways of subsisting, treatment of captives, manners, dress, diversions, etc., which is nowhere else given. Rev. Mr. Rowlandson sought the aid of the Council in his efforts to redeem the captives, many of whom were his own kindred. At first it was impossible to find any one of the friendly Indians willing to venture as messengers among the hostiles, mainly because they had been so cruelly and shamefully abused by the English and were now confined at Deer Island^ where they could not be accused or placed under suspicion. At last, however, one Tom Dublet, or Nepanet, consented to go, and was fitted and instructed by Major Gookin, and upon April 3d started from Cambridge, and returned with the answer of the Sachems on April 12th. The correspondence between the Council and the Sachems is still preserved, in part, though the original letters are lost. The messenger brought back word from Sam Sachem, Kutquen and Quanohit, Samuel Uskatuhgun and Gun- rashit, Sagamores, and owners of the captives, that all the cap tives taken at Lancaster were well except the youngest of Mr. Rowlandson, who was dead. At last, after many negotiations by the faithful Nepanet, Mr. John Hoar, of Concord, who, more than any man in the colony, had the confidence of the Indians, accompanied by Nepanet, and another friendly Indian, " Peter Conway," and bearing the ransom, twenty pounds in money and goods, raised by several gentlemen for the redemption of Mrs. Rowlandson, met the Sachems near Wachusett Hill, and on May 2d received and conducted that lady to Lancaster, and the next day to Boston. The other captives were redeemed at various times and places afterwards. The place where Mr. Hoar met the Sachems is well identified, being marked by a large rock called " Redemption Rock," a noble landmark near the ancient Indian trail, between Lancaster and Mount Wachusett, and in the present town of Princeton, on the easterly side of a beautiful valley, across which, in the dis tance, towers Mount Wachusett. The locality is known as " Everettville," from the name of an ancient family who have lived here for generations. In 1880, Hon. Geo. F. Hoar, of Worcester, a lineal descendant of the chief actor in this transac tion, for the English, purchased the land containing this site, and " REDEMPTION ROCK." 355 set it apart for memorial purposes, and caused the following inscription to be placed upon the face of the rock : UPON THIS ROCK MAY 2c 1676 WAS MADE THE AGREEMENT FOR THE RANSOM OF MRS. MARY ROWLANDSON OF LANCASTER BETWEEN THE INDIANS AND JOHN HOAR OF CONCORD. KING PHILIP WAS WITH THE INDIANS BUT REFUSED HIS CONSENT. The writer visited this rock and copied this inscription, May 13, 1896, in company with Mr. Edward G. Davis of Leominster, who secured several fine photographs of the rock and sur roundings. The inhabitants of Lancaster fled from their town after its destruction, and were scattered among their friends in various towns nearer to Boston, but within a few years many had returned and begun the resettlement. CREDITED AT LANCASTER GARRISON. October 19, 1675. Peter Jennings 00 18 00 Joseph French 01 03 03 Walter Davis 00 18 00 John Nash 01 04 00 George Wiatt 01 04 00 Edward Young 01 04 00 Thomas Wemnon Richard Grotis Thomas Whitney Henry Elliott Joseph Birch November 30, 1675. Michael Berstow 01 16 00 Stephen Parker 01 14 02 Palsgrave Wellington 01 16 00 Henry Salter 01 16 00 John Beare Munnings Sawyer George Wyatt December 20, 1675. Thomas Wenmon 01 16 00 Walter Davis 01 16 00 Peter Jennings Thomas Whitney January 25, 1675-6. John Roberts 03 01 08 Stephen Fish 03 00 00 Nathaniel Hadlock 03 01 08 John Fitch 03 01 08 John Stanwood 03 01 08 Zacharia Eyres 03 01 08 Stephen Parker 03 01 08 Francis Nichols Thomas Woods Walter Davis Henry Salter Munning Sawen Palsgrave Willington Michael Bairstow February 29, 1675-6. Francis Nichols 00 18 00 Thomas Marble 01 18 06 Edward Young John Nash 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 10 00 03 00 00 00 06 00 01 16 00 01 16 00 01 04 00 03 07 08 00 12 00 01 10 00 00 18 00 01 03 02 01 08 02 15 02 15 02 01 01 00 19 08 01 18 06 01 18 06 356 KING PHILIP S WAR. April 24, 1676. William Pashle 04 16 00 June 24, 1676. Henry Sparkes 01 16 10 AT THE GARRISON AT BILLERICA. November 30, 1675. John Boyd James Poply Thomas Welch 03 00 00 03 00 00 02 14 00 Joseph Dowse William Chapman David Jones 02 14 00 03 06 00 03 00 00 December 20, 1675. John Gale 03 01 08 James Smith 00 07 08 John Essery Joseph Dowse Joseph Low James Poply John Boyde James Barnard 03 06 00 00 07 08 03 01 08 00 06 00 00 06 00 03 01 08 Daniel Baldwin John Fisk Richard Satell Stephen Coolidg Nathaniel Liverrnore 03 00 00 03 06 00 03 12 00 03 06 00 02 14 00 January 25, 1675-6. Humphry Millard Daniel Baldwin 03 18 00 01 19 04 Stephen Coolidg 02 01 00 Francis Wainwright Howell Davis Richard Sautill Francis Nichols William Chapman Francis Bond Francis Wainwright John Lowell April 24, 1676. 01 04 00 June 24, 1676. 02 11 04 July 24, 1676. 00 19 08 04 16 00 01 10 00 John Fisk Edward Bishop Ephraim Jones August 24, 1676. 06 11 00 | George Wyatt September 23, 1676. 06 12 00 "AT BLACKPOTNT." July 24, 1676. 06 02 06 I Ezekiell Hamlin 01 06 06 00 16 00 05 14 00 05 14 00 06 00 00 GARRISONS AT BROOKFIELD AND CHELMSFORD. 357 Edward Milton August 24, 1676. 03 05 02 AT THE GARRISON AT BROOKFIELD, OR February 29, 1675-6. QUABAUG. John Weld John Rayman James Kelling Ezekiel Levitt Joseph Hide Isaac Perkins George Norton Nicholas Rawlins Benjamin Dunnage John Artsell Benjamin Dunnage Thomas Scott Thomas Cooper Thomas Philips Joseph Garfell Benjamin Pickerin Charles Duckworth John Cromwell John Norton William Bodkin John Cromwell Charles Duckworth Edward Blancher David Crouch 00 08 06 June 24, 1676. 01 00 00 John Norton 05 01 00 John Mansell 01 04 00 July 24, 1676. 01 00 06 01 01 04 00 06 04 00 07 00 00 04 03 01 08 00 John Jeffery Joseph Swady Ebenezer Engellsbee Henry Pellington John Algar Thomas Stacie 01 04 00 Silvester Haies 01 04 00 05 00 00 John Simple John Glide 05 03 06 00 17 00 04 10 00 03 15 00 Benjamin Bucknall Ephraime Savage Lt. Christopher Cole Charles Blinco 03 15 03 John Mansell 01 12 06 04 12 06 Nathaniel Partridge John Sargent August 24, 1676. 02 09 09 David Jones 02 09 06 05 10 00 02 06 02 Philip Sandy Thomas Phillips John Cutler 01 09 00 01 18 00 04 19 04 04 12 06 04 12 06 05 07 00 03 02 06 01 12 06 04 10 00 03 02 06 05 08 00 04 15 00 04 07 09 03 02 06 03 13 01 10 00 00 05 08 00 03 02 06 07 06 06 05 08 00 00 18 00 05 09 08 AT THE GARRISON AT CHELMSFORD. November 20, 1675. Moses Cleaveland 02 12 08 I Samuel Parris 02 12 08 November 30, 1675. Zachariah Shedd John Ellis Richard Nevers Joseph Samson Thomas Sawin Thomas Train 03 00 00 04 10 00 03 00 00 04 10 00 03 00 00 03 00 00 Joseph Simons John Roby John George Hopewell Davis William Fisher Henry Harris 03 00 00 01 04 00 04 16 00 04 16 00 04 16 00 04 16 00 358 KING PHILIP S WAR. Francis Nichols Hezekiah Pilsbury Joseph Estman John Martin Benjamin Allin Amos Singlater Nathaniel Ladd John Bear John Darling George Wyatt Samuel Parry Robert Shelston Walter Davis Thomas Wenmore Benjamin Lernett Moses Cleaveland John Welch Thomas Henchman Joseph Parker Sen r Daniel Woodward Josiah Clarson Henry Harris Samuel Cleveland John Clark Henry Sparkes John Mirecke John Solinden William Fisher Arthure Crouch John George Thomas Traine Samuel French John Elliot Nicholas Lunn John Mirick John Barbene Joseph Simons December 02 11 04 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 20, 1675. Thomas Estman Richard Beach William Foster Henry Hams Joseph Lamson Hopewell Davis January 00 09 04 00 09 04 00 09 04 01 00 06 02 09 08 00 09 04 00 09 04 04 16 00 02 08 10 25, 1675-6. John Eliot Joseph Simons John Salendine Arthure Crouch William Ballard Moses Cleaveland Richard Nevers John George Thomas Train February 29, 1675-6. 00 07 08 | Ephraim Matsou March 24, 1675-6. 01 04 00 03 08 06 00 06 00 00 06 00 00 12 00 00 10 00 01 17 08 01 15 02 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 08 00 00 06 00 02 08 00 02 04 06 02 08 00 01 04 00 01 10 00 00 12 00 Joseph Parker Juu r . 00 12 00 June 24, 1676. 03 08 06 Robert Parker 00 10 00 03 16 02 03 12 10 03 07 08 03 12 00 03 12 00 03 13 08 Nathaniel Graves, Capt. Timothy Day George Stedman John Polly George Parson 12 01 00 04 16 00 02 12 02 02 18 00 01 16 00 July 24, 1676. 06 12 00 John Priest 05 02 00 06 12 00 06 12 00 George Sowder Samuel Damrnan 04 03 00 03 10 00 06 12 00 Suball Stearnes 03 05 00 06 12 00 Samuel Heberd 04 00 06 03 08 06 03 18 00 George Person Alexander Alhort 04 00 06 02 10 06 August 24, 1676. 03 10 00 06 00 00 06 13 08 03 18 00 Henry Harris Samuel Perry John Polly John Barbene 03 00 10 03 18 00 00 18 10 05 04 06 GARRISONS AT DTJNSTABLE AND GROTON. 359 John Priest William Peirce September 23, 1676. 02 08 00 07 12 06 John Bateman 07 11 00 David Falkner Sen r . Andrew Lewis "AT DEDHAM. July 24, 1676. 04 09 06 | David Falkner Jun r September 23, 1675. 02 14 00 03 03 06 AT THE GARRISON AT DUNSTABLE. December 20, 1675. Richard Hawkins John Gary Thomas Webb Anthony Baker John Carv Samuel Selsby John Gary John Maloone Robert Parris John Maloone Robert Parris Abraham Parker Samuel Read John Bush Samuell Bull Thomas Chamberlain Jeremiah Morse Thomas Bancroft 03 06 00 03 06 00 05 02 00 James Matthews John Maloone Richard Hawkins January 25, 1675-6. 06 15 04 February 29, 1675-6. 03 03 04 June 24, 1676. 01 04 00 05 12 02 08 15 08 Jonathan Crisp James Mathews Thomas Webb August 24, 1676. 04 10 10 | Abraham Parker September 23, 1676. 03 18 00 James Car 04 12 06 John Barnard 04 12 06 Ephraim Sawyer AT THE GARRISON AT GROTON. November 9, 1675. 01 16 00 03 07 08 02 04 06 John Largin Timothy Forgley Samuel Whitney November 30, 1675. 02 09 08 02 02 00 00 10 00 John Wood Josiah Wheeler Hugh Taylor 04 13 04 04 08 04 02 00 00 02 07 00 03 18 00 05 10 00 04 10 10 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 04 06 02 02 00 00 04 04 01 13 04 02 12 02 03 01 08 360 KING PHILIP S WAR. Jacob Dane 03 00 00 John Dammon 03 01 08 David Church Shuball Sternes Thomas Wood 04 10 00 03 00 00 03 01 08 Daniel Starling Jonathan Sprague Thomas Dunnell 03 03 04 03 00 00 03 00 00 William Gill 03 07 08 Jacob Winslow 03 06 00 John Hawes 01 10 00 Pelatiah Smith 03 00 00 Onesiphorus Stanly 03 05 02 Thomas Micheson 03 05 02 December 20, 1675. John Codington Jonathan Parker 01 15 02 03 08 00 Daniel Canada Nathaniel Domton 04 10 00 03 00 00 Ephraim Bemish Timothy Frogly John Tedd 03 08 04 01 16 00 03 06 00 Sebread Taylor Thomas Frost Samuel Allin 03 00 00 03 12 00 03 09 04 Samuel Hagar Israel Hill 03 06 00 02 06 02 William Doule William Halford 03 00 00 03 18 00 January 25, 1675-6. Benjamin Simons Lot Johnson Samuel Bull Samuel Cleaveland 02 08 00 03 00 00 02 02 00 02 08 00 Simon Stone Samuel Hager Ephraim Bemis Subaell Stearnes 03 18 00 00 18 00 00 12 00 01 10 00 Daniel Canada 00 18 00 Thomas Frost 00 07 08 Jacob Dane Jeremiah Moss 00 18 00 00 06 00 Timothy Frogly David Church 00 07 08 01 06 06 February 29, 1675-6. "UNDER CAPT. WHEELER AND AT GROTON GARRISON Nath Hill 01 12 10 Samuel Fletcher Jun r 01 12 10 Jonathan Hill 01 12 10 Eleazer Brown 01 19 04 Joseph Foster John Waldo Francis Dudly Samuel Fletcher Sen r 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 12 10 01 04 05 Cyprian Stevens Benjamin Graves John Bates Stephen Goble 00 14 03 01 19 04 01 12 10 01 12 10 April 24, 1676. Thomas Foster Eleazer Ball 03 00 00 Jonath Crisp 00 06 00 Daniel Adams 02 10 06 00 06 10 June 24, 1676. Zachary Crisp Mathias Smith 02 15 08 01 06 06 John Hands Morris Truelove 01 06 06 01 06 06 Nathaniel Green William Clough John Goff James Chever Edmund Gage William Bordman 01 12 06 01 06 06 01 11 00 01 11 00 01 06 06 01 02 03 Joseph Pollard Moses Wheat Humphry Millard Thomas Region Timothy Cutler Richard Griffeth 01 11 00 02 08 00 00 06 10 02 14 00 02 08 08 01 16 10 Benjamin Graves 00 10 00 HADLEY AND MAKLBOROUGH GARRISONS. 361 July 24, 1676. Richard Pasmore John Bush John Potter Symon Willard 01 04 00 00 19 03 AT THE GARRISON AT HADLEY. June 24, 1676. Benjamin Chamberlain 06 12 00 July 24, 1676. Jacob Hewens Thomas North Benjamin Poole Robert Coates Nicholas Dourell Thomas Bryant Richard Snowden John Strabridg Joseph Griffin Robert Bardell James Moult Thomas Pore John Whitteridge Stephen Grover Moses Morgan John Prat James Verin William Batt Robert Dawes Edward Bishop Darby Morris John Dunster William Turner 08 12 02 09 00 00 13 04 00 Joseph Smith Philip Kertland Thomas Chard 12 03 04 03 17 00 05 17 00 05 11 00 14 08 00 John Upham John Chamberlain 12 06 00 13 06 00 August 24, 1676 07 05 04 10 16 00 Ephraim Regiman John Hadlock 07 09 02 11 04 00 09 18 00 Thomas Staines 04 01 04 09 14 06 08 02 00 John Largin 04 00 00 September 23, 1676. 13 10 00 Jeremiah Clothar 12 06 00 10 16 00 02 00 00 07 16 00 Benjamin Lathropp Hugh Pike John Tucker 03 18 00 14 11 00 06 00 00 16 07 00 John Fisher 08 06 00 11 07 00 William Chub 06 04 00 13 16 00 11 08 00 Joseph Hovey Moses Dudee 00 08 06 04 04 00 14 07 00 05 13 00 Henry White Thomas Jones 14 14 00 14 12 00 16 16 00 John Bill 11 15 00 08 08 00 Archebell Forest 05 18 00 AT HATFIELD. July 24, 1676. 03 00 00 September 23, 1676. 08 18 00 06 17 00 Jabez Musgrove Richard Smith 14 12 00 14 15 00 AT THE GARRISON OF MARLBROW. September 21, 1675. 01 13 04 Thomas Owen 04 13 04 02 00 00 01 19 04 Joseph Barber 02 14 00 362 KING PHILIP S WAR. October 19, 1675. James Cheevers Thomas Turner William Blockwell Timothy Laskin William Ferman Samuel French Richard Young David Roff John Baker Richard Young Henry Gibbs John Nash Jonathan Jackson Obadiah Searle Robert Rowuden Thomas Owen Richard Young Thomas Hopkins Daniel Wriht Timothy Laskin Morgan Jones 02 14 00 02 12 02 Henry Gibbs Richard Roberts 03 07 00 04 04 00 03 02 06 November 30, 1675. 04 13 04 Jacob Adams 04 13 04 02 08 00 Jonathan Jackson 04 13 04 03 00 00 03 12 00 03 02 00 Daniel Wright John Figg John Broughton 04 13 04 01 10 00 02 12 02 January 25, 1675-6. 03 08 06 Daniel Davison 03 06 00 " Cornmiss." 05 06 00 02 19 00 Jonathan Orris 03 12 00 00 18 00 Richard Roberts 02 16 06 01 05 08 William Turner 04 16 00 06 08 00 February 29, 1675-6. 07 04 00 William Farman 03 17 00 02 18 02 Gustin John 01 19 04 AT March 24, 1675-6. 00 13 00 April 24, 1676. 00 09 00 | Benjamin Parmater June 24, 1676. 02 09 08 | Thomas Dennis July 24, 1676. 02 09 08 | John Burges September 23, 1676. 08 02 00 | Joseph Davis THE GARRISON AT MEDFIELD. April 24, 1676. Thomas Davis Humphrey Richards Clement Maxfield James Parker Thomas Davis Vincent Shuttleworth 02 02 00 01 16 00 John Ho well June 24, 1676. 00 18 00 02 08 00 01 15 00 02 11 04 Thomas Sherman Elisha Hollaway Charles Cohon Thomas Jones 02 03 08 01 05 06 03 00 10 06 00 00 02 02 00 02 11 04 05 04 06 03 18 10 03 04 02 MEDFIELD AND MENDON GARRISONS. 363 July 24, 1676. James Harrington Charles Cahan James Parker Moses Hubbard 02 01 01 00 04 00 10 00 Edward Goose John Belcher Darby Morris Samuel Smith August 24, 1676. Samuel Procter Alexander Mackenny 01 08 00 02 02 00 Anthony Hancock Samuel Smith September 23, 1676. Daniel Meginny Thomas Sherrard 00 18 00 00 12 00 John Richardson Israel Hill Edward Goose 01 16 10 James Marshall Darby Morris James Harrington 01 17 08 02 12 02 Vincent Shuttleworth AT THE GARRISON AT MENDAM (MENDON). September 14, 1675. John Harrison, Serg 1 Henry Tite 02 06 06 01 10 10 David Landon Thomas Hansett October 19, 1675. Jonathan Dunning John Tuckerman Samuel Moore Joseph Griffin John Gosse 01 00 06 02 12 03 03 02 06 02 04 06 00 11 00 Thomas Pinly Henry Pettington (Pellington) John Starr Edward Barton December 20, 1675. William Bosway Jonathan Dunning John Roulstone 04 14 02 04 04 00 04 04 00 John Andrews John Sawen Simon Stone William Jaques Richard House Richard Godfrey Jonathan Torry Thomas Beedle 04 16 00 05 06 10 02 02 10 01 14 02 02 02 10 John Stearnes John Willington Samuel Goff John Gepson Samuel Thacher John Weld Thomas Hanchat 01 10 00 01 13 04 Stephen Cooke Thomas Browne Israel Leavitt Brian Morphy Joseph Griffin Gilbert Foresight 02 08 00 02 08 00 04 07 00 04 01 00 James Waumesly John Long Thomas Crassell John Ellis January 25, 1675-6. Thomas Andrews 04 04 00 John Low Henry Pellington Thomas Jones 04 04 00 00 13 04 Theophilus Gushing William Cole Thomas Brideltine 00 18 00 02 16 06 00 10 02 03 03 00 03 06 00 06 13 08 01 17 08 04 04 00 02 14 10 02 05 04 02 01 00 00 18 00 01 03 00 00 11 00 01 12 06 00 11 00 05 02 06 04 11 06 00 10 00 00 10 00 00 10 00 00 10 00 00 12 00 00 10 00 00 10 00 00 10 00 00 10 00 01 07 04 10 00 00 00 10 00 05 06 03 02 02 10 02 02 10 01 16 00 364 KING PHILIP S WAR. February 29, 1675-6. William Cole 01 10 00 | John Tuckerman June 24, 1676. John Rowlstone 01 10 00 | Benjamin Dyer AT THE GARRISON AT NORTHAMPTON. September 23, 1676. Samuel Souch Philip Matoon William Halford 14 11 00 08 02 00 10 16 00 John Rowlston Samuel Tiley John Roberts 00 06 00 00 12 00 John Paison James Pemerton John Clark Samuel Trescott Joseph Adams John Basse Joseph Long John Spurr Joseph Holmes Thomas Swift Robert Braine Thomas Holman John Winchester Stephen Gulliver Samuel Wadsworth John Riply Martin Sanders John Thare Thomas Drake Jacob Nash Joseph Penniman Isaac Griffin Moses Pain Samuel Pain David Walsbery Isaac Umpphre als Humphrey Hopestill Clapp John Wells AT PUNCKAPAUGE. March 24, 1675-6. 00 13 00 April 24, 1676. 00 09 03 00 09 03 Benjamin Badcock Robert Parker 00 09 00 00 09 00 George Witty Samuel Maxfield 00 09 00 Clement Maxfield 00 09 00 Samuel Gulliver 00 09 00 Jeremiah Hall 00 09 00 John Daniel 00 15 00 00 09 00 00 13 00 00 09 03 Henry Roberts Samuel Clap George Lyon Samuel Picher 00 09 00 Thomas Lawrence 01 16 00 Jonathan Picher June 24, 1676. 00 13 00 00 13 00 Joseph Crosby Samuel Hall 00 09 00 00 13 00 Christopher Webb John Mills 00 13 00 John Belcher 00 13 00 Ebenezer Williams 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 Thomas Modsly John Ripley Martin Sanders August 24, 1676. 00 09 00 John Minott 00 09 00 Ephraim Newton Israel Meade 00 09 00 John Herse 00 09 03 Roger Bulling 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 13 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 12 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 13 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 13 00 00 06 04 00 09 00 00 09 00 04 10 00 04 10 00 00 13 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 13 00 00 13 00 SPRINGFIELD GARRISON. 365 Edward Brinkford als Linsford 00 06 04 Thomas Berd 00 07 06 Hopestill Humphry Joshuah Hinsher Robert Willts September 23, 1676. James White 00 13 00 Joseph Tucker 00 09 00 Charles Davenport Thomas Davinport 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 AT THE GARRISON AT 8PRINGFIELD. February 29, 1675-6. John Lowden 01 10 00 March 24, 1675-6. 01 04 00 Jonathan Tainter Samuel Irons John Pitcher Joseph Holmes Josiah Rockwood Joseph Willingtou John Pinchon Maj r William Pilsbery John White John Bradshaw Samuel Jewell Daniel G-alusha Jeremiah Norcross Nathaniel Lyon Thomas Elliott Isaac Cakebread Thomas Friend June 24, 1676. 09 01 16 10 15 00 10 07 04 John Cragge George Seddon Isaac Gleson 10 16 00 13 17 00 Joseph Pike John Smith 21 14 03 Gershom Swan 10 07 00 John Lowden 11 18 00 July 24, 1676. 10 14 04 13 05 00 Matthew Abdee August 24, 1676. 14 05 00 12 03 00 Roger Prosser September 23, 1676. 13 16 00 i Benjamin Knowlton 16 16 00 16 16 00 08 08 00 Thomas Bond John Mirick 08 13 00 11 09 08 17 04 09 10 01 04 09 01 06 11 06 00 12 09 00 12 02 00 03 02 06 16 12 00 13 10 00 14 12 00 AT THE GARRISON AT WESTFIELD. John Langworthy Samuel Alcock, Doct r . Solomon Bates Abraham Kingston Joseph Chamberlain July 24, 1676. 13 01 00 04 05 00 Joseph Dudly, Chap 1 . 17 02 08 August 24, 1676. 12 06 00 12 06 00 14 08 00 John Lamb Nathaniel Osborn 12 13 09 16 05 08 366 KING PHILIP S WAR. September 23, 1676. AT George Manning James Hadlock William Rogers Thomas Norton Daniel East Jonathan Freeman Daniel Wight William Arnold Daniel Hawes Samuel Colbron Nathaniel Weare Ellis Barren Richard Benner 13 05 08 02 07 00 13 02 00 13 18 00 Robert Hastings Thomas Watts William Peacock Fearnot King THE GARRISON AT WOODCOCK S. August 23, 1675. 00 11 02 September 3, 1675. 00 10 04 September 14, 1675. 00 10 04 00 12 08 00 10 04 Samuel Guild John Fuller June 24, 1676. 00 10 02 July 24, 1676. 00 19 04 | Henry Chamberlain August 24, 1676. 00 16 02 September 23, 1676. 00 10 00 06 09 00 07 10 00 14 14 00 15 16 00 00 10 04 00 10 04 03 18 00 Thomas Mudg Simon Grover James Kidder AT THE GARRISON AT WADING RIVER. September 14, 1675. 02 10 06 02 10 06 John Leroby Benjamin Bridgham AT WAMESICK. January 25, 1675. 00 12 00 02 10 06 00 18 00 John Starr John Mason John Allin Thomas Phinly John Goff GARRISON AT WRENTHAM. November 20, 1675. 04 16 00 05 06 03 05 06 03 04 16 00 04 16 00 John Hammon Thomas Wadduck John Ellis Edward Gross 05 06 03 04 19 04 05 06 03 01 11 08 ASSIGNMENT OF WAGES. 367 January 25, 1675-6. Anthony Hancock John Ellis John Mason John Parker Isaac Heath John Starr John Hammon Clement Hamlin John Bacon John Allin Robert Ware Mark Baker 01 18 06 02 02 00 01 16 10 Thomas Hoppin Israel Hill John Hammon February 29, 1675-6. 02 08 00 April 24, 1676. 00 07 08 | John Ellice June 24, 1676. 02 01 00 02 08 00 04 04 00 David Faukner John Parker July 24, 1676. 00 12 00 September 23, 1676. 05 02 00 04 16 10 00 12 00 Peter Buckly, of the Traine 02 14 00 02 01 00 02 02 00 02 19 00 01 04 00 02 07 00 00 18 00 ASSIGNMENT OF WAGES. The following lists show the custom of the times. The towns assumed the payment of the wages of their own soldiers, to their families left at home, the families thus receiving sure and im mediate aid, and the towns being credited to that amount upon their colonial " rates," or taxes. It was doubtless a means of great help to the families, and of saving to the towns, as it secured at once the support of the families without public charge, and at the same time the prompt payment of taxes. The value of these lists to the historical and genealogical student will appear in the evidence they afford as to each man s residence at that time. The proof might not be positive in every case, yet in general it may be concluded that where a man assigns his wages to a town, it is because he considers that his place of residence. August 24, 1676. s. d. Braintree-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp u Viz. 42 17 06 Edward Bishop p d him as per Assignment 06 09 02 Richard Evens " 01 14 02 George Witty 00 09 00 Joseph Adams John Bass Jonathan Pitcher John Belcher 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 10 02 368 KING PHILIP S WAR. Samuel Irons 01 09 01 James Atkins 01 03 06 Robert Parker 03 09 10 James Franklin 03 18 06 John Lamb 10 18 10 Caleb Raye Samuel Spencer Martin Sanders 00 16 04 01 01 04 00 06 10 Abraham Kingston 09 03 09 s. d. Dorchester-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp 8 Viz. 37 00 05 James Haughton p d as per Assignment 00 19 08 Samuel Maxfield 00 09 00 Clement Maxfield 01 07 00 John Pason Samuel Triscot Timothy Tilston Jonathan Atherton 05 03 00 00 09 00 02 05 00 02 15 00 Benjamin Allin 01 16 10 Jeremiah Hall 00 09 00 Samuel Blake Thomas North 02 05 00 09 00 04 Henry Leadbetter 02 11 00 Samuel Rigby 03 06 08 John Spurr " 01 18 00 John Smith John Minot 00 12 09 00 13 00 s. d. Dedham-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp t8 Viz. 70 07 02 Timothy Dwite p d him as per Assignment 17 00 00 Samuel Guile 06 08 04 Daniel Wight 02 09 08 David Falkner 03 17 06 David Falkner Jr. 02 15 06 Jeremiah Fisher Benjamin Wight Ephraim Wilson John Thurston Nathaniel Farington Edward Sewell 00 12 00 00 12 00 00 12 00 00 12 00 00 12 00 00 12 00 John Day 01 13 06 John Day 02 14 09 John Bacon 00 12 00 Ephraim Pond 02 08 00 Daniel Hawes 01 06 06 John Groce John Coockow James Hening Peter Woodward Richard Bennett 00 12 00 00 04 02 00 05 00 00 17 02 03 11 00 Jonathan Gay 02 08 00 Samuel Colborn 02 04 09 John Ware John Aldis 01 14 03 02 08 00 Thomas Bishop 07 06 09 Nathaniel Weare 00 19 04 Benjamin Mills David Freeman 01 03 06 01 03 06 John Batle 00 12 00 Ditto. Hingham-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp" Viz. 56 18 02 Paul Gilford pd. him as per Assignment 01 03 10 John Chamberlaine 10 09 11 John Dunbarr Paul Gilford Richard Francis 02 03 11 02 19 00 01 00 00 Samuel Gill 02 09 06 John Cutler 15 00 00 Benjamin Bates John Jacob 05 15 02 07 17 00 Thomas Thaxter 02 16 00 John Bull 02 12 06 Samuel Nicholson 02 11 04 August 24, 1676. Hull-To wne Cr. by Sundry accp ts Viz. 12 13 09 James Chever pd. him as per Assignment 00 18 09 Henry Chamberlaine 03 18 00 James Chever 02 05 00 John Angell John Jacob pr. Nath 1 Boswortb. 03 12 00 02 00 00 ASSIGNMENT OF WAGES. 369 Ditto. Milton-Towne Cr. by Sundry George Lyon pd. him by Assignment 00 09 00 John Redman 00 18 00 Samuel Wadsworth per Abigail 16 15 06 Henry Roberts 00 09 00 John Jourdan 00 07 00 Walter Mory 00 07 00 Richard Silvester 04 12 08 Benjamin Badcock 03 09 06 Samuel Gullifer 00 13 00 Accp t3 Viz. ! John Daniel John Pitcher John Fenno Richard Silvester John Pitcher Thomas Voss Samuel Pitcher Thomas Holman Ephraim Newton Thomas Swift Benjamin Badcock 47 11 09 00 09 00 00 12 10 00 15 04 00 18 00 03 17 07 07 10 00 00 09 00 02 18 10 00 09 00 01 02 06 00 09 00 August 24, 1676. Medfield-Towne Cr. by Sundry Accp 9 viz. John Plimpton pd. as per Assignment 02 14 John Hammon 02 08 00 00 14 Josiah Rockwood Vincent Shuttleworth Edward Grose 04 06 03 14 02 11 02 16 Ditto. Roxbury-Towne Cr. by Sundry William Davenport pd. as per Assignment 02 10 00 Samuel Williams 05 01 00 Joseph Smith 09 13 02 Isaac Johnson per his widow 01 05 00 John Curtis 02 08 01 Onesiphorus Stanly 01 11 03 Jonathan Fairbanks 03 01 00 John Clark 00 09 03 Hugh Clark 01 05 00 Joseph Lyon 01 06 05 John Whitney 00 18 00 Accp 18 Viz. John Scott John Weld Henry Bowen Samuel Williams John Weld John Watson Richard Hall John Newell John Pason John Weld Joshuah Lamb Andrew Levins Robert Seaver 51 17 01 August 24, 1676. Weighmouth-Towne Cr. by Sundry Accp t9 viz. 52 Benjamin Poole pd. as per Assignment 09 18 00 Thomas Bay ley 01 16 10 John Pinchon Esq r pr. Samuel White 12 10 01 Joshua Philips John Record John Pinchon Esq r Richard Adams Ditto. Bradford-Towne Cr. by Sundry Accp 8 viz. John Griffin pd. him as per William Smith assignment 00 19 03 04 08 04 06 00 10 09 10 16 08 00 15 00 01 17 06 03 06 06 00 18 00 05 10 06 00 17 08 00 10 00 01 11 00 02 02 10 01 10 00 01 02 06 01 10 09 19 05 04 00 00 10 00 00 03 17 06 01 03 03 02 00 370 KING PHILIP S WAB. Ditto. Beverly-Towne Cr. By Sundry Accp ts viz. 31 01 06 John Dodge pd. as per Assignment 01 10 00 William Dodge 01 00 00 Joseph Eaton 05 18 06 Jonathan Mosse 01 05 10 John Rayment John Hull John Clark Samuel Hebert Mark Hascall 03 11 00 04 14 02 03 08 00 04 00 06 05 13 06 Ditto. Glocester-Town Cr. By Sundry Accp ts viz. 17 05 10 Benjamin Jones pd. as per Assignment 01 04 00 John Fitch 02 15 10 John Stanwood 01 02 00 Philip Stanwood Samuel Stanwood John Day John Hascall 03 08 06 02 11 06 03 15 00 02 09 00 August 24, 1676. Hampton- To wne Cr. By Sundry Accp 8 viz. 50 14 03 Edward Colcord pd. as per Assignment 02 00 00 Joseph Cask 03 08 06 Benjamin Molton 03 01 02 Ephraim Matson 01 03 00 John Lovitt 00 14 00 "William Sanborn Thomas Roby John Browne Palmer Joseph Smith James Hobbs 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 04 00 01 08 06 01 17 06 03 05 00 Israel Blake 01 00 00 John Palmer 04 19 04 Abraham Drake 00 13 08 Ebenezer Perkins 01 15 00 Moms Hobbs 01 04 00 John Browne 06 12 05 Francis Jennings 00 19 06 John Sleeper 00 18 00 Isrel Clifford 00 00 00 Micael Towsly 00 17 00 Benjamin Sweett Samuel Colcord Michael Towsly Thomas Browne 05 01 00 01 01 04 01 15 00 03 08 04 Ditto. Ipswich-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp ts viz. 67 15 09 John Chub pd. as per Assignment 06 04 06 Alexander Alhor 02 10 06 Joseph Proctor John Browne John Potter 00 17 00 02 08 00 01 04 00 Samuel Bishop 01 10 00 Joseph Fellows 01 15 00 Isaac Fellows 01 05 06 Richard Pasmore Jonathan Wade Thomas Smith 02 12 05 06 00 10 01 13 04 Simon Grow 02 07 05 Thomas Dennis 01 05 06 Joseph Marshall 04 00 00 Samuel Ingols 01 10 10 Amos Gourdine 01 00 00 Edward Neland 02 00 00 John Line John Pengilly Joseph Jacob Isaac Perkins 04 02 06 03 18 03 02 09 10 00 15 04 Josiah Clark 02 16 06 Simon Adams 06 03 00 Thomas Philips Jacob Wainwright 04 11 06 02 14 00 ASSIGNMENT OF WAGES. 371 August 24, 1676. Linn-Towne Cr. By Sundry Accp 8 viz. 59 19 11 Samuel Ireson pd. as per Isaac Lewis 03 02 00 Assignment 03 03 03 Thomas Barker 04 16 09 John Linsly 00 18 00 Robert Coates 07 08 00 Philip Cartland 04 17 08 William Bellow 03 03 06 John Man 02 08 00 Joseph Burrell 01 04 00 John Burrell 03 06 00 Samuel Fisk 00 16 06 John Moore 01 10 00 Elisha Fuller 02 02 04 Thadeus Berry 03 03 06 Thomas Leonard 00 15 08 Thomas Browne 03 11 00 Moses Chadwell 01 01 00 Isaac Wellman 02 05 00 Daniel Johnson 03 04 00 Samuel Graves 01 13 00 Timothy Bread . 03 03 06 Eliazer Linsey 01 16 00 James Robinson 00 11 03 August 24, 1676. Marblehead-Towne Cr. By Sundry Accp ts viz. 25 10 10 Gregory Sowder pd as per George Cross 01 16 08 Assignment 04 03 00 Walter Emmett 02 10 00 Ephraim Jones 05 14 00 Augustine Ferker 01 04 00 Rowland Ravensbee 01 07 04 John Farmer 01 00 06 Enoch Lawrence 03 00 00 Mark Pitman 01 16 10 Thomas Russell 01 14 00 Thomas Stanford 01 04 06 Ditto. Newbury-Towne Cr. By Sundry Accp 9 viz. 21 05 02 Jonathan Emery pd as per JohnWilcott 04 10 00 Assignment 05 09 00 Richard Browne 03 03 04 Edmond Browne 03 01 08 Edward Ordway 01 09 02 Henry Sparkes 03 12 00 Ditto. Rowly-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp ts viz. 27 02 10 John Wood pd. as per Samuel Cooper 01 16 00 Assignment 03 15 08 Thomas Lever 03 03 06 Samuel Smith 03 03 06 Robert Eames 04 17 05 Samuel Wicomb 04 17 09 Joshuah Boynton 05 09 00 August 24, 1676. Salem-Towne Cr. By Sundry accep 8 viz. 151 19 04 Thomas Fuller pd. as per William Woodbury p r Assignment 01 10 00 John Higinson 05 10 00 John Dodge 03 13 06- John Bullock 14 03 00 Edward Bishop 00 16 00 Symon Broadstreet Esq r 04 10 00 William Wainwright 02 09 10 Nathaniel Pease 04 06 00 William Pilsbury 03 17 06 William Hathorn 07 05 09 Henry Kenny 03 03 06 Jeremiah Neale 03 00 00 Joseph Deares 01 15 00 John Richards p r . Bar- Abraham Snitchell 00 11 06 tholmew Gidney 28 17 00 372 KING PHILIP S WAK. George Wyat Thomas Robinson p r Jonathan Curwin 05 14 00 05 06 00 Peter Jennings Samuel Pickworth Richard Norman Edward Counter John Smith 02 01 00 01 10 10 Joseph King Robert Pease Jacob Pudenter 01 04 00 Francis Nichols Thomas Howard 03 02 00 Francis Bond Joseph Jeffords Nicholas Deurell 01 09 00 07 18 00 William Stacie Abel Oazier Francis Jefford 05 16 09 Thomas Bell Henry Cooke 02 03 00 Thomas Veasie 04 02 00 00 11 06 01 10 00 16 00 16 06 01 03 04 16 06 11 John Wild Ditto. Topsfield-Towne Cr. By pd. as per Assignment 06 15 06 August 24, 1676. Wenham-Towe Cr. By pd. as per Assignment Thomas Kemball 02 07 03 00 00 00 12 00 01 16 00 01 16 04 02 18 10 Ditto. Haverell-Towne Cr. By Sundry Accp" viz. 24 16 08 Samuel Huchins pd. Assignment Nathaniel Haseltine as per 00 15 06 01 00 06 Thomas Hartshorn Richard Allin Robert Swan 00 12 00 01 17 06 00 11 10 Samuel Aires John Keisar John Clements 00 08 06 00 08 06 00 08 06 Henry Kemball Benjamin Grealy Jonathan Henrick 01 06 10 01 00 06 00 15 04 Amos Singletons Nathaniel Lad Daniel Lad 00 05 00 00 05 00 00 05 00 John Corly John Roby Samuel Ladd 00 15 04 00 08 06 03 17 00 George Brown John Johnson 00 13 00 00 02 06 Thomas Kinsbury Robert Swan 01 12 04 01 04 00 Philip Esman Benjamin Singleterry Thomas Durstou Thomas Eastman 00 15 04 00 15 04 00 17 10 01 04 00 John Haseltine Samuel Watts Joseph Bond 01 04 00 00 13 06 00 13 06 Ditto. Andover-Towne Cr. By Sundry Accp 3 viz. 25 19 00 John Love joy pd. as Assignment Stephen Johnson Samuel Phelpes John Preson per 01 10 00 01 02 06 02 14 00 02 10 00 Roger Mark John Matson Joseph Parker Nathaniel Stephens Ebenezer Barker 02 09 00 02 14 00 01 10 00 02 09 06 02 02 00 Zechariah Ayres Joseph Abbott 01 10 00 02 14 00 James Fry 02 14 00 ASSIGNMENT OF WAGES. 373 August 24, 1676. . By Sundry accp ts viz. 05 06 04 r John Saunders 02 14 00 00 12 10 Thomas Farmer 01 19 00 Ditto. >. By Sundry accp ts viz. 113 04 01 r David Mead 00 09 04 01 00 06 01 14 06 00 06 00 John Dowgin Justinian Holding Isaac Beech 00 09 04 00 07 06 00 09 04 00 09 04 William Rider 00 10 02 01 12 10 John Streeter 03 17 05 02 06 00 Samuel Goff 01 00 00 01 02 03 Edward Goff 01 13 04 01 01 04 Daniel Woodward 02 05 00 01 12 06 John Stedman 01 17 00 05 16 01 01 08 04 Joseph Cooke Peter Towne 04 02 00 00 07 06 00 09 06 00 09 04 02 06 09 John Cragg Ephraim Philips Robert Robins 04 17 00 01 15 06 00 09 04 00 15 08 Samuel Gibson 00 03 04 02 10 04 06 11 04 Joseph Pratt Nathaniel Green 00 15 04 01 08 06 04 06 04 Isaac Gleson 06 18 10 01 02 06 Jacob Hill 05 12 00 03 08 06 00 14 00 Justinian Houlding Edward Mitchensonn 01 15 06 03 15 00 01 16 08 Samuel Green 01 17 06 02 07 05 Abraham How 02 10 00 02 13 02 Samuel Green 03 15 00 02 17 00 05 17 08 Daniel Gookin Esq r 03 07 06 Nathaniel Hill pd. as per Assignment Cambridge-Towne Cr. By Thomas Frost pd. as per Assignment Jonathan Lawrence Crackbone Samuel Prentice John Gibson Philip Russell William Bordman John Dickson Nathaniel Green Mathew Abdee Thomas Earns Thomas Frost John Jones Christopher Muskins Justinian Houldin John Salter John Bradshaw Joseph Holmes Zechariah Paddlefoot Daniel Woodward John Watson James Chevers William Hely Ambros Mackfassett Samuel Cooper Jonathan Remington August 24, 1676. Chelmsford-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp ts viz. 05 05 06 Joseph Hide pd. as per Assignment 01 00 06 Jacob Wilier per Jerath- mell Bowers 02 15 00 John Barrett 01 10 00 Ditto. Concord-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp" viz. 45 John Wheeler pd. as per Assignment 01 07 06 Joseph Wheeler 02 09 00 Abraham Temple 02 02 00 Thomas Wheeler Jun r . 04 00 00 Daniel Gobely 01 10 00 Benjamin Graves 00 10 00 James Sawyer 00 04 04 Nathaniel Billing William Kean John Hadlock Joseph Chamberlain 08 Stephen Goble 01 Benjamin Chamberlain 06 John Lakin 00 Richard Blood 00 06 04 04 10 00 04 14 06 06 12 03 06 12 00 00 15 00 12 00 11 10 374 KING PHILIP S WAR. Ditto. Charles-Towne Cr. By Sundry Cornelius Church pd. as per Assignment Benjamin Switzer John Upham Charles Duckworth 02 15 09 00 04 02 10 03 05 02 09 06 John Prescott Sen . 05 00 00 John Mirecke 03 09 08 Giles Fifield 00 16 10 Daniel Baldwin 00 03 04 John Newman 04 07 02 Zechariah Brigden John Walker 00 15 06 01 06 10 Hugh Taylor Joseph Lowe Samuel Lord 04 05 06 01 06 11 01 14 10 Nathan Dunklin 03 09 10 John Rosse 01 14 00 James Miller 01 12 10 John Mirick 06 00 00 David Crouch 01 05 00 Solomon Phips Jonathan Gary Hopewell Davis Edward Smith 02 09 04 01 01 00 01 09 00 00 14 06 Richard Scott 02 02 00 Obadiah "Wood 00 15 08 William Vines per Jacob Greene 01 09 02 Thomas White 00 14 00 David Crouch 03 10 08 Samuel Blaincher 00 08 10 Joseph Douss Samuel Cutler 02 09 06 00 16 10 James Kelling Josiah Wood 04 09 06 01 03 04 John Cromwell 02 18 00 Thomas Rand 01 04 10 Thomas Henchman 06 15 10 Henry Harris Nathaniel Douse 02 01 02 01 07 04 Richard Scott 03 10 06 Francis Earle 00 10 02 Samuel Dalton 01 00 07 John Mousall 00 02 04 David Jones 05 15 06 James Lowden 00 10 00 Thomas How 01 00 00 John Barrett 02 07 01 Thomas Davis 02 05 00 accp 8 viz. 308 Zechariah Jones Thomas Wheeler James Richardson John Spaulden Zechariah Fowle Josiah Hobbs John Sellenden John Eliot Thomas Croswell John Eliot William Chapman Isaac Fowl Jonathan Johnson Richard Scott John Shepheard Howell Davis Daniel Smith John Tarball William Ward, Deacon Edward Smith Samuel Hunting Benjamin Lathrop William Stephens Samuel Jewell Joseph Harris Henry Salter James Miller Henry Harris John Long Matthew Griffin Samuel Scripture Lawrence Hammond William Rawsou Samuel Jewell Hugh Taylor John Cromwell John Essery Nathaniel Graves Joseph Pike John Edes Joseph Royal Arthur Clouch Edward Wilson Ephraim Roper Silvester Haies Zechariah Johnson Isaac Johnson Samuel Hunting John Simple 15 06 00 05 01 03 10 02 02 03 06 01 01 01 12 18 12 04 04 10 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 10 01 13 06 01 10 00 00 08 00 02 05 04 04 00 00 03 12 00 02 06 04 03 00 06 03 04 10 03 10 06 14 01 08 15 16 10 04 10 06 00 10 02 06 04 04 09 01 15 06 05 00 00 02 06 00 00 13 08 09 06 02 06 09 12 01 00 01 11 00 00 06 08 00 10 02 06 12 00 00 09 00 04 07 06 04 10 00 14 10 05 02 00 00 18 00 04 01 02 02 03 01 01 00 03 02 07 01 01 02 00 00 00 08 08 00 04 00 00 03 04 ASSIGNMENT OF WAGES. 375 Henry Berisford 01 15 07 Samuel Champine 00 11 06 John George 06 12 00 William Fisher 06 12 00 Joshuah Edmunds 00 06 10 John Goodwin 02 13 00 James Smith 05 17 08 Josiah Smith 00 08 10 John Douss Joseph Lambson Thomas Stacy Joseph Lambson William Whiting Joseph Lampson Zecheriah Brigdon James Richardson 00 10 00 01 05 08 03 15 04 00 16 03 01 03 04 00 12 00 02 03 00 06 02 06 John Eliot 03 18 00 Jacob Amsden 03 00 00 Henry Harris Daniel Edmonds 03 12 10 02 06 08 William Clough 00 14 00 John Smith 00 03 04 Joseph Pike 02 07 05 August 24, 1676. Medford-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp 8 viz. 04 02 05 Evan Jones pd. as per Assignment 01 04 08 James Parker 02 17 09 August 24, 1676. Maulden-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp t8 viz. 49 11 03 John Winslow pd. as per Assignment 02 09 10 John Pemberton per Deborah 02 12 00 John Ross 02 09 00 William Greene Phineas Sprague Ellis Barren Jonathan Sprague Ellis Barron 00 17 00 00 17 00 00 16 02 04 02 04 02 02 04 Samuel Hay ward 01 19 04 John Martine 00 09 04 Robert Carter 00 09 04 William Green Phineas Sprague John Green 00 08 06 00 07 00 00 07 00 James Nichols 00 08 06 John Dexter 00 07 00 James Winslade 00 09 04 Samuel Green 00 07 00 William Laraby 00 09 04 John Wait 03 05 00 Joseph Wilson John Lind 00 07 00 00 07 00 Jonathan Sprague 00 18 10 Triall Nubury 09 05 05 Bernard Pearch 01 04 00 John Floyde 10 15 08 Thomas Newell John Sprague Thomas Mudge 00 07 00 00 07 00 00 07 00 Ditto. Redding-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp 8 viz. 12 17 10 Daniel Galushapd. as per Assignment 04 17 06 Jonathan Parker 02 10 04 Thomas Hodgmau Samuel Damman 01 08 00 04 02 00 Ditto. Water-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp ts viz. 146 10 00 Abraham Williams pd. as per Assignment 03 05 06 Richard Sawtell 00 19 08 George Woodward Thomas Whitney William Goddard 00 07 08 00 02 06 00 09 04 Enos Lawrence 00 08 09 Jonathan Stimpson 00 02 06 Joseph Willington Samuel Whitney 04 18 03 00 19 08 376 KING PHILIP S WAR. Zecheriah Cutting John Sawin Joseph Peirce Theophilus Philips John Prescott Moses Whitney Isaac Leonard Joseph Bemish John Sterns Jonathan Smith William Bond Josiah Jones Joseph Wait Samuel Sterns John Parke John Fisk John Eames John Bigello Daniel Peirce Richard Child Joseph Garfell John Cutting Daniel Warrin Ephraim Bemish Joseph Smith John Stone Thomas Train Samuel Church 02 09 10 03 03 06 01 06 00 02 18 06 10 00 00 02 16 00 01 15 02 02 10 00 01 07 00 01 10 00 01 00 00 01 02 00 00 15 04 02 03 06 02 14 00 04 13 06 04 05 00 00 09 00 02 12 06 03 03 06 02 07 00 00 18 06 00 09 08 03 05 00 01 00 00 03 03 06 06 12 00 01 18 05 Michel Bastow Thomas Whitney John Willington John Oynes Henry Spring Jonathan Whitney William Shattucke Samuel Thacher Jeremiah Norcrass Daniel Smith William Price John Stone Thomas Chadwick Samuel Perry William Bull William Price Jun r Samuel Perry Munning Sawin Eliazer Beeres John Coolidge Seubael Sternes John Hastings Stephen Coolidge John Oyne Thomas Swann John Bright Daniel Gookin Esq r . Samuel Wood 01 01 02 16 06 00 04 02 02 08 06 00 15 08 02 19 10 03 08 02 04 10 00 01 04 03 09 05 08 01 05 06 02 13 00 10 10 10 10 03 18 00 00 04 02 01 07 03 01 05 06 00 12 00 00 12 00 02 10 00 03 01 00 00 19 08 01 02 02 02 00 00 01 08 10 04 10 00 02 11 02J 00 13 01} August 24, 1676. Wooborn-Towne Cr. By Sundry accp ts viz. John Barbene pd as Assignment John Malloone per 03 19 02 08 02 08 John Baker 03 00 00 Robert Simson 03 12 00 Joseph Simons John Cutler 04 17 00 04 15 02 Benjamin Simons Joseph Winne John Priest 02 12 00 00 14 00 03 05 00 John Kendall 02 16 10 John Polly John Bateman 01 06 00 02 02 00 John Polly Joseph Waters Abraham Parker 00 18 10 02 13 09 04 10 10 Isaac Brookes 01 01 06 Joseph Wright John Baker 04 10 00 05 15 03 John Barben 05 94 06 Josiah Clarson 02 07 10 107 12 08 Joseph Simons 02 07 Josiah Clarson 03 11 William Butler 02 19 Increase Wiun 01 12 Benony Macktonell 02 09 Thomas Parker 03 1 1 Joseph Richardson 03 01 Thomas Hall 01 06 Thomas Pierce 00 14 John Richardson 00 17 Increase Wing 00 14 Richard Francis per Timothy Burkes 02 00 Nathaniel Richardson 00 14 Samuel Richardson 00 10 John Priest 05 02 Moses Cleaveland 03 03 Samuel Cleavland 03 07 John Wilson 00 14 William Green 00 12 10 02 02 10 06 03 08 00 03 00 03 00 03 00 00 06 08 00 00 XXVI. PHILIP, CANONCHET AND THEIR INDIANS. A BRIEF statement, from the side of the Indians, of their movements and plans so far as can be judged by the evi dence we have, may help us to a better knowledge of the war, than any of the histories afford. All know that Metacom, or Pometacom, second son of the great chief Massasoit, whom the English named Philip, and who is known in history as King Philip, was the recognized instigator and leader in the great Indian war which has always been designated by his name. Massasoit s eldest son Wamsutta, called by the English Alexan der, succeeded to the dignity and possessions of his father in 1661, but lived only about a year in the enjoyment of his inheri tance. His wife was Weetamoo (her name best known), who seems to have been not only an hereditary princess, but a very able and energetic woman. She was called the "- Squaw Sachem of Pocasset," and derived that title either from her father or an earlier husband. She claimed to own all the country around Pocasset in her own right, and also the disposal and rule of her tribe. Weetamoo was a personage of importance and influence in the war, as, after the death of Wamsutta, she returned to her people, and retained her title and power amongst them ; and it would appear that just before the breaking out of the war, she had some three hundred fighting men under her authority. There is good evidence that Queen Weetamoo and Petonowowett, whom the queen married after the death of Wamsutta, were both opposed to the war, but could not control the young war riors who were attracted to Philip s war-dances, and were there inflamed with the war-passion of the chief. Weetamoo was the sister of Wootonekanuske, it is said, and as she was doubly sister-in-law of Philip, it is not strange that she followed the inclination of her warriors, and yielded to the craft and power of Philip, thus greatly strengthening his hands. Petonowowett would not join Philip, but withdrew to the English side and fol lowed their fortunes throughout the struggle. Weetamoo further assisted the cause of Philip by renouncing her recreant husband, and marrying Quinnapin, a Narraganset chief, a near relative of Canonchet, and second in command at the great " fort-fight." 378 KING PHILIP S WAR. He was prominent in the attack upon Lancaster, becoming the master of Mrs. Rowlandson by purchasing her from her captor. There are many proofs of the ability of Philip as a diplomat, in planning and preparing for the war. He succeeded his brother as the chief Sachem of the Wampanoags, about 1662. Judged by all that can be gleaned from history, Philip seems to us, not the terrible monster which our first historians painted him, but a leader of consummate skill, in bringing together the unwieldy and most unwilling forces, and pushing forward other bands of other tribes to bear the brunt and dangers which his own plotting had brought upon them. He was doubtless hurried into open hostilities by the ill-advised action of his young warriors, long before even his own tribe were prepared for the consequences of such rash action. Thousands of acres of corn were hastily abandoned by his people in their precipitate flight. The Wam panoags, with all related and dependent bands, were overwhelmed by the unexpected forces sent against them, and were only saved from utter destruction, partly by the slow motion of the English troops under Capt. Henchman, but mainly by the adroit and secret management of Philip in " wafting " his whole active force over the water, leaving only one hundred of their women and children, and escaping into the Nipmuck country. All the fear ful consequences which hung upon the issue of that escape, are known to us now, and it is clear that if the colonies had at all appreciated the gravity of the situation, the whole war might have been prevejnted, by holding Philip, by the retention of a few hundred men for a few days more at Rehoboth, or near by, with their Mohegan scouts. As it was, Philip succeeded in eluding his pursuers, disposing his non-fighting people in various tribes, and, while holding a sufficient body-guard with himself, to inspire re spect and insure a hearing, he had some of his ablest men visiting the more distant tribes, and everywhere persuading, bribing and threatening the chiefs into cooperation ; so that before the end of September, he had practically all the Nipmucks, with the tribes of Massachusetts from the Merrimac to the Connecticut, pledged and already active in his service. But the impression from all known testimony is, that loyalty to Philip was inspired by fear, rather than love or admiration. There is no proof known to me of any act of personal daring on his part, and I have not found any real evidence that he was personally engaged in any of the battles of the whole war, or that he led, in person, any attack, or raid, or ambuscade. The rumors of that day, and the statements of later historians, that he was present at certain fights, are not verified by evidence ; and while there is little doubt that he directed and planned many of the most bloody and destructive attacks upon the settlements, he seems always to have kept at a safe distance from personal danger. The successes of the Indians at Brookfield, Northfield and THE HOSTILE INDIANS. 379 Deerfield, were won by the Nipmuck chiefs, who were by no means ready to accept Philip as a general, while they received him as an ally. In December, 1675, Philip retired beyond the Connecticut, and before the first of January was encamped some forty miles above Albany. It is probable that he was there negotiating with the Mohawks, by his agents, for their cooperation in the spring, and it is believed that he had assurance from the French, of ammu nition and arms, together with a body of Canadian Indians to reinforce him. But there were many things which might well discourage the chief at this time, notwithstanding all these promises of help, and the fact that the most of the tribes were committed to the war. Canonchet, and his Narragansets, had not yet committed them selves, nor seemed inclined to do so, which was very depressing, not only to the leaders, but to those other chiefs and tribes who in one way or another had committed themselves to his cause. And again there was disaffection among the tribes and the chiefs who had been involved in the war by Philip s arts. But soon a new and tremendous impulse was given to the Indian side, when the scouts and advanced parties of the Narragansets began to come among the tribes in their hasty retreat, bringing news of their defeat and the disastrous destruction of their great fortress. At first they were not believed, and were not received by the Nip- mucks and their allies, because they had been looked upon as pledged by the English to remain neutral ; and, as the denunci ation of the great leader and his tribe for their indifference, had been rife in all the great war councils of the adherents of Philip, so now these advance parties of their retreat were not believed, and when they came to the camp at Meminimisset, they were re pulsed, and their messenger shot at, being accused of treachery and of being friends of the English, although they brought Eng lish scalps and heads in proof of their story. But when larger parties came, bringing more proofs of the same kind, and furnished confirmation from various sources, there was great rejoicing by the Indians that they had been thus struck down by the English, whom they had been so slow to fight. Their rejoicing was equally great, because of the immense acquisition of the strong tribe and valiant chief, the prestige of whose name and numbers turned all faltering and hesitation into willing and eager adherence. And as they had been last to break into hos tility against the settlers, so their causes of hatred and desire for revenge were deeper. At the beginning of " Philip s War," the Sachem of the Narra gansets was Canonchet, son of Miantoninioh, whose tragic story has been told in the first chapter. He was an able, prudent and brave chief, who, though subjected to the tyranny of the colonies, and followed by the constant enmity and falsehood of old Uiicas, 380 KING PHILIP S WAR. had been able to maintain peace with the English and their allies, and to lead his people to prosperity and power ; so that in 1675, he was by far the most powerful chief in New England, his fighting force being reckoned by some authorities, as high as four thousand warriors. This estimate is probably double his actual force. It is said that he had encouraged Philip in the design to make a general revolution against the colonies, and had promised to be ready in 1676 to enter such war with his whole available force. When, however, Philip s men precipitated hostilities by the murder of Sausamon, first, and then by open and active preparation, when justice was dealt to the murderers, Canonchet restrained his people, and would not join Philip, but on the other hand would not assist in fighting him. When the troops had driven Philip and his people out from Mount Hope, and held them, as they thought, securely, in the Pocasset swamps, command came from Boston to march the army into the Narraganset country and demand a treaty at the point of the sword. That action seems to us now, as strategy, the height of stupidity ; in spirit, the extreme of intolerance ; and in result, entirely disastrous. The only pretext for the invasion, was the rumor that the Narra- gansets were harboring some of the women and children of those who were in arms. They did not find Canonchet, or any of his Sachems, but only a few old men, whom they forced to act in behalf of the tribe. With these irresponsible persons, they for mally enacted a treaty, remarkable only for its intolerance, and utter disregard of the rights of the Indians. Canonchet seems to have ignored this treaty entirely, and probably looked upon it as one more instance of the crafty influence of Uncas, who had hastened forward to assist the English at his earliest opportunity. And yet the Narraganset chief held aloof from Philip s active operations, evidently strengthening his own people with arms, ammunition and provisions, besides training his warriors and forti fying his country in several parts, as if determined to withstand any attack which might be made upon him. Canonchet, thus standing aloof from participation in the war, and fearing nothing from the English, who were constantly exer cised against him by the wily arts of the Mohegans, was summoned to Boston, where he appeared before the Council and bore himself with manly dignity, but was constrained by his situation and by the threats of the Council, to sign a treaty binding him to fight against the hostile Indians, and to seize and deliver up all those Indians who had taken part in the war, and were now fled to his territories for shelter. This demand, so impossible for him to fulfil, he was induced to promise, under the pressure of present danger, knowing well that a refusal to accede to their demands would be taken as confirmation of the charges against him, and would result in his detention and perhaps death. He had no idea THE HOSTILE INDIANS. 381 of the sacredness of his promise in this treaty, and his experience with the English in former treaties, had not tended to give him exalted ideas of treaty promises. He was allowed to depart, hav ing received the present of a coat, gaudily laced. We do not know how much effort he made to carry out his promise ; we do know that he gathered his own people into the great fortress in the swamps, where, in December, he was overwhelmed by the Colonial army ; in which battle great numbers of his people were destroyed. The story of that fearful battle and its result to the English, and from their side, has been told. We know but little from the Indian side, and that only by accidental testimony. The English troops recruited at Wickford until the last of January, when, having been reinforced with fresh troops, they began the " Long March " through the Nipmuck Country, around to Marlborough, and then to Boston. Canon chet and his Narragansets had profited by the time of the army s inactivity ; they returned to their ruined forts and buried their dead, cared for their wounded, and quietly sent their women and children with their sick and wounded out of harm s way. Then with a strong band of his fighting men as a rear-guard, Canonchet hung about the army, and closely observed all its motions, keeping out his scouts in every direction, with a line of posts and temporary camps along the whole line of the great " trail," even to the vicinity of Quabaog, where he soon established rela tions of alliance with the hostile tribes gathered at headquarters at Meminimisset. But just upon the eve of the advance of the troops, the Narragansets made a swift descent upon Warwick, where they burnt the buildings and corn and hay of Mr. Car penter, as we have seen. It is probable that the Indian leaders were somewhat disconcerted by the advance of the army, both as to time and direction. The attack upon Mr. Carpenter was partly, perhaps, to turn the attention of the English in that direction. They succeeded in eluding the English, however, and were re ceived into the great gathering of the tribes at their chief head quarters beyond Quabaog, as told above. There is evidence that old Canonicus, uncle of Canonchet, and many of the older chiefs of the Narragansets and their subject tribes, like Ninigret, chief of the Niantics, tried hard to restrain the warriors from open war. But the proud spirit of the younger Canonchet could not bow to the terrible blow they had received, and while the old chiefs were allowed to negotiate with the English about a treaty, Canonchet and the younger men, with Quinnapin as an able second, were training and preparing for war. After the junction was made with the Northern tribes, Philip having been apprised of it, and having promised plenty of ammunition from the French, the Narragansets were added as a part of the great hostile force of Indians gathered in the western parts. Canonchet 382 KING PHILIP S WAR. became the real leader of the great unorganized army of the Indians. His warriors far outnumbered the other tribes, besides being better trained and equipped, despite the severe losses they had met at the great fort. There is little doubt that the confederated tribes determined to drive the English out from the Connecticut valley, and to hold it. After locating his people in safe retreats, Canonchet, with a large party of his warriors, returned towards his own country, in order to recover some of the large quantities of corn secreted there, and especially for seed-corn to plant the English fields, from which they had driven the owners. A large raiding party from the various tribes came southward also. It is prob able that the two companies were not far from each other, when Capt. Peirse arrived at Rehoboth, and they probably united in his destruction, as related above. After the battle with Capt. Peirse (March 26, 1676) the Ind ians made a furious attack upon Rehoboth upon the 28th day, burning some forty houses and nearly as many barns. Upon the 29th they appeared at Providence, and though the aged Roger Williams, the life-long friend of the southern tribes, went forth to meet them, unarmed, and leaning upon his staff, he was met by their old men, and warned by them that it would not be safe, even for him, to venture amongst them ; and they said also, that there were many " stranger Indians " mixed with their tribes. He was thus forced to retire to the garrison-house with the rest of the inhabitants, while the Indians advanced and burned some thirty houses of the town. Robert Beers was slain, it is said, at this time. The Indians seem, after that, to have broken up into small prowling bands, which scouted upon the borders of the out lying towns, making an assault here and there, as opportunity seemed to offer, April 9th at Billerica ; April 19th at Andover, where they killed Joseph Abbot and captured his younger brother Timothy, burned the house of Mr. Faulkner and wounded Roger Marks; while another band, the same day, burned the deserted houses at Marlborough ; and still another party appeared at Hingham and Weymouth, where they killed two men, one at each place. On April 20th they renewed the attack upon Hingham, where they burned the houses of Israel Hobart, Anthony Sprague, Joseph Jones and Nathaniel Chubbuck. On April 21st the main body of the Indians in Massachusetts swept in around Sudbury, of which attack detailed account has been given heretofore. Account has been given also of other attacks and operations in the Northern parts. In the meantime the Connecticut people were bestirring them selves, and had quietly enlisted some eighty of the friendly Indians of the Mohegans and Pequods, and a band of the Niantics, whose Sachem, Ninigret, although a Narraganset, had remained THE HOSTILE INDIANS. 383 neutral, in appearance, at least. Forty-seven English soldiers were joined with these, under command of Capt. George Denison of Stonington, and Capt. James Avery of New London, Connect icut. The Niantics were led by the chief Catapazat ; the Pe- quods by Casassinamon ; the Mohegans by Oneco, son of Uncas. This force, apparently unknown to the scouts of Canonchet, approached Pawtucket, and captured one of his guards in the vicinity, with two women, one of whom confessed that Canonchet was near at hand with but a small guard. With this news, con firmed by their scouts soon afterwards, the force pushed on and soon came in sight of the wigwam of the Sachem whom they sought. When the quick ear of the chief caught the sound of an approaching body of men, he sent two of his attendants to the top of a hill near by to ascertain the cause, and these not return ing, but fleeing for their lives, two more were sent, one of whom returned with the word that the enemy was close upon him. He seized his gun and sought to escape, but in his flight he came near a party of the scouts, who gave chase so closely that he was unable to elude them, and finally was forced to cross a small stream, where, entering hastily, his foot slipped on a small stone and he fell, wetting his gun, which was thus rendered useless, and he was left defenceless ; and at the mishap, he confessed afterwards, " his heart turned within him, and he became as a rotten stick, void of strength." Monopoide, a Pequod Indian, was nearest him, and overtook him within thirty rods of the river, and captured him without any attempt at resistance. The pur suit was thus strenuous, because the chief had been obliged in his flight to cast off his blanket, and then his lace-coat, which he had of late received from the English, and then his belt of wam pum, and was thus recognized. But though helpless and captive, he was still the proud and un- conquered chief ; and when young Robert Stanton, an interpreter, and among the first of the English to come up, began to question him, he turned away haughtily, saying, " You much child, no understand matters of war; let your brother or your chief come, him I will answer." Even Mr. Hubbard was struck by his noble bearing and heroism, and in his " Postscript," written after the first part of his history was printed, compares him to one of the old Romans, Attilius Regulus, since he would not accept of his own life upon compliance with the English. The condition seems to have been that he would send one of his Counsellors commanding his people to yield to the English, and thus save his life. His resolution was not to be shaken by any threats or bribes ; and when he was told of his sentence of death, he replied that he " liked it well, that he should die before his heart was soft, or he had spoken anything unworthy of himself." He was taken to Stonington and there shot by Oneco, son of Uncas, his life-long enemy, and two Sachems of the Pequods, of equal rank. 384 KING PHILIP S WAR. There is no nobler figure in all the annals of the American Indians, than Canonchet, son of Miantonimoh, Sachem of the Narragansets. As he had become the real head and life of the Indians at war, so his capture was the death-blow to their hopes. Had Canonchet lived to carry out the plans already entered upon, it is probable that the result of the campaign of the spring and summer, would have been far different. As it was, the great body of Indians still for some time held together, congregated upon the Connecticut about and above the " Falls," where Capt. Turner and his company found them and attacked them, on May 18th and 19th, 1676, as has already been related. Of all the hostile tribes in this war, historians have assumed that Philip was the leader ; and there is little doubt that he was the manager as well as the instigator of the war. But there were many powerful chiefs now engaged, and they were coming to realize that the destruction and plundering of a few villages of the settlers, here and there, resulted in provoking their ven geance, and in forcing the Indians themselves to withdraw from their old homes, into swamps and mountains and remote places. There was disaffection among the chiefs, as they found the situation of their tribes growing more and more precarious, and felt the same pressure, which had already driven the Wampauoags, Narragansets and many of the Nipmucks, from their homes, back upon the territory of the Northern tribes, where they were now apparently preparing to settle for the present, and were already utilizing the fishing-places, hunting-grounds and cornfields. The war party, however, was greatly in the majority, being composed of those who were actuated by desire for revenge, having lost all ; those young and impetuous, who believed that it was possible to destroy the English, utterly, in the way of gaining glory in war, according to their ambition ; and those who saw no other way left than to fight the war through for their lives. Philip was enabled to maintain some show of control over these chiefs, as it was he who had negotiated with each tribe, and managed in securing for them supplies of ammunition and arms ; while he was also the authority to whom the French were promising supplies and men, for the reduction of the plantations in the coming summer. No one of those now left, dared to lead a revolt against Philip, and his personal adherents were in every camp and close to every chief, so that plots against him were sure to bring immediate vengeance upon the plotters. The Narragansets, after the death of Canonchet, were drawn more under the authority of Philip, as several of the most notable warriors among the Narraganset chiefs, had been his adherents from the start. Pomham, or Pumham, whose territory lay next to Philip s do mains, was a Narraganset chief of that part of Narraganset, called Shawomet, embracing what is now Warwick. He was considered THE HOSTILE INDIANS. 385 by the English the ablest soldier of the Narragansets, in his day. Although an old man, he was active in all the operations of Philip s war. His sons, also, were brave leaders. He was killed, desperately righting for his life, in Dedham woods, July 25, 1676, by a party of English and friendly Indians, under Capt. Samuel Hunting. At the same time his son was captured, whom Mr. Hubbard describes as "a very likely Youth, and one whose Countenance would have bespoke Favour for him, had he not belonged to so bloody and barbarous an Indian as his Father was." The party of Indians consisted of some thirty-five, all of whom are said to have been "his relations and subjects." Quinnapin, a near relative of Canonicus, early espoused the cause of Philip ; he married Weetamoo, as explained above ; was said to have been Canonchet s Lieutenant in the " Fort Fight," and a leader in the attack upon Lancaster in February, 1675-6. He purchased Mrs. Rowlandson from the Indians who captured her, and from her account we learn something of his character, habits and family. He had two wives beside Weetamoo. When the league of the tribes in the West was broken up, Quinnapin remained with Philip, and returned with him to the southern parts. In August, 1676, he was captured, and upon the 24th of that month was tried at Newport, R.I., by a Court-Martial, held by the Governor and Assistants, and, with other captives, was condemned to death ; on the 25th he was shot. Pessacus or Mossup, a Narraganset, a nephew of Canonicus, and a very influential counsellor of Canonchet, remained with a part of the tribe in the northern parts, and was finally killed, beyond the Pascataqua river in 1677, by the Mohawks, it is said. There were other notable chiefs of the Narragansets who took part in the war, Poto~k, Quaqualh, " Stone- Wall-John," and others, but the first three were the principal. Of the Wampanoags, Philip s chief men were, Tuspaquin, Sachem of Assowomset, who married Amie, as she was called by the English, sister of Philip and daughter of Massasoit. Tuspa- quin was called also " The Black Sachem," and he was at the head of the large party of Indians who, in the Spring of 1676, hung about the towns of Plymouth Colony and made successful raids against Scituate, Bridgewater and Plymouth. He was one of the last to hold out after Philip s death ; and when the wan dering bands were reduced to a few handfuls here and there, he was induced to come in and surrender by the promise of Mr. Church, and by the capture of his family, who were well treated and taken to Plymouth. Mr. Church promised him that his life and the lives of his family should be spared ; but when he came in and surrendered, Mr. Church was not at Plymouth, and Tus- paquin was immediately tried and executed. Annawon. This old chief appears to have been the most inti mate and trusted counsellor of Philip. He was close to his 386 KING PHILIP S WAR. chief at the time of his death, and led the band safely out of the swamp. He was captured soon after, with the remnants of the Wampanoags, at a place within the present limits of Rehoboth, and surrendered under promise of " good quarter." He gave up the treasure, and " royalties " of Philip, which he had in charge, to Mr. Church. He was executed at Plymouth, at the same time with Tuspaquin. Totoson, son of the celebrated chief " Sam Barrow," was another of the " great captains " of Philip who survived him awhile, only to be destroyed by Mr. Church, and his mixed com pany of English and Indians. Of other chiefs, who were important actors in the war, were the various sachems of the local tribes, some of whom have received mention in the course of this history. In the time of Philip s war, the interior tribes of Massachusetts were known under the gen eral term of Nipmucks, or Nipnets, while it is probable that the Indians themselves understood that name to include the tribe which lived in the territory included in Worcester county, south of Worcester city, and probably beyond the State line, and upon the ponds, in the present towns of " Dudley, Webster, Douglas, Sutton, Oxford, Auburn, &c." The name Nipnet, means " fresh water," and is supposed to have distinguished these tribes from the " Coast Indians." The tribes, living along the Connecticut and its branches, were called " River Indians," and included the Agawams, Waranokes, Nonotucks, Pacomptucks and Squakheags. The Quabaug Indians lived in the territory about the old town of Brookfield. The Nashaways had their chief village at Lancas ter, and included the large villages at " Washakum Ponds," and about " Mount Wachusett." Of these tribes the most prominent leaders in the war were, Mattoonus, a Nipnet ; Monoco and " Sagamore-Sam," of the Nash aways ; Mawtamp of Quabaug, and Pakashokag, called " John of Pakachoog." Upon Philip s realizing the growing disaffection of the River Indians, and becoming aware also of their negotiations with the English, to betray him, he left the Connecticut, with his own tribe, and such of the Narragansets as still followed with him, and came to the parts about Wachusett, where his force was increased by many of the Quabaugs and Nashaways, under Sagamore Sam and Mawtamp. But this force was by no means manageable, for any length of time, and only when being organized for active service. Dissensions and jealousies began to arise, while the English were preparing for vigorous measures of pursuit ; and about the first of June, 1676, Philip, with his Wampanoags and Narragansets, went away towards their old home. Philip and his tribe went to Poka- noket, or Mount Hope ; while the Narragansets passed into their own country. The English became aware of his presence in his old place, early THE HOSTILE INDIANS. 387 in July, and thereafter he was constantly pursued by parties sent out from Boston and Plymouth, but he could not be found. The Narragansets, in the meantime, were being pursued and captured and destroyed by the Connecticut forces, with their Mohegan and Pequod allies. The principal exploit of these forces was the massacre of the people of the " Old Queen," Magnus (known also as the " Sunk Squaw," and also as " Quiapen " ), on July 2d. Within a few days more than two hundred of the enemy came in and surrendered to the Plymouth authorities ; and between that and the close of July, there was a constant series of captures and surrenders of the Indians, so that Philip was left almost alone ; even his wife and young son having been captured by the Eng lish, mostly the mixed company under Mr. Church. About the 7th of August, a small company went out from Taunton, and capt ured a party of the Indians of Weetamo, who, herself, trying to escape across the river upon a small raft, was drowned ; and her body being found a few days after, her head was severed, and being placed upon a pole, was paraded in the street at Taunton. Philip, at last, being hunted down by the English and Indians on every side, retired, with a few of his staunchest friends, to his old retreat in a swamp at Mount Hope. Mr. Church was then in command of a scouting company of English and Indians from Plymouth, and having passed over from Pocasset, where he left most of his company, to Rhode Island, to Major Sanford s, he there heard from the Major and Capt. Golding, of Philip s con dition, as reported by a deserter, whose brother Philip had killed, for advising surrender. This Indian offered to pilot the English to Philip s hiding-place. Major Sanford and Capt. Golding both offered to go with his company to assist in Philip s capture. They were soon back at "Trip s Ferry," with the rest of his company under Capt. John Williams of Scituate. Having arrived at the swamp, piloted by the deserter, Mr. Church requested Capt. Golding to lead the skirmishing party, led by the pilot, into the swamp, to " beat up the quarters " of Philip. This the Captain accepted, and drew out his allotted men. Church instructed him to creep forward as silently as possible, in order to encompass and surprise the Indians, but when discovered to shout and make all possible noise, as the orders to the various ambuscades were to fire upon all, who came towards them silently. Mr. Church then placed the rest of the men, with most of the Indians under Capt. Williams, so as to encompass all ways of escape from the swamp, placing an Englishman and an Indian together. Hardly had these arrangements been completed when a musket-shot, followed by a whole volley, rang through the swamp, and then the general onset began. The Indians were taken completely by surprise, and Philip, springing hastily from his sleep, under the rude open wigwam, seized his powder-horn and gun, and started from the hillside, where he had made his 388 KING PHILIP S WAR. camp, for the deeper security of the swamp. But in his flight, he came face to face with two of Mr. Church s men, and, the Englishman s musket missing fire, the Indian immediately shot the great chieftain through the breast, so that he fell forward upon his face, with his gun beneath him, in the water of the swamp. The Indian who killed Philip was named Alderman, and is said to have been the same who betrayed his hiding-place. When this Indian ran to Mr. Church with the news of his achievement, he was told to keep it secret until after the rest of the enemy had been beaten out of the swamp, or captured or killed. Their retreat and escape from the English was ably con ducted by old Annawon, Philip s chief Sachem. When all the company had gathered about the place, where Philip s party had bivouacked, Mr. Church told them the great news of Philip s death, and presently ordered some of the Indians to drag him out of the swamp, to the solid land. There he was chopped in quarters and beheaded, and left unburied; his head and one hand were given to Alderman as a reward, and in Mr. Church s account it is said that he got " many a penny " by showing the hand. Such was the end of Philip of Mount Hope, one of the most remarkable characters in all American history, whose biography has never yet been adequately written, and who, although by no means a hero, or a character to be admired, was, without doubt, a wise and skilful leader, and more dreaded by the colonists than any other man, before or after him. His death was heard of with universal rejoicing, in the colo nies, and was considered as the practical close of the war. XXVII. CHRISTIAN INDIANS OF NEW ENGLAND. IN this history, reference has constantly been made to the Christian or Friendly Indians, and in some cases, comments have been made as to their relation to the war, their per sonal services, etc. It seems fitting that some more general and definite reference should be made to their services, and their rela tion to the Colony, as well as to their place in public opinion. In preceding chapters, many incidents concerning the Chris tian Indians have been related in connection with the operations of the English soldiers, while the same matters, somewhat more at length, are here related again. It will be readily understood, that these repetitions are made for the sake of preserving the continuity of the story, in this chapter devoted to these Indians. In order to a clear understanding, it may be well to refer / briefly to the origin of the movement, which resulted in " chris- K tianizing " a part of the Indians in the New England Colonies. The experiment was inaugurated by the zealous efforts of Rev. John Eliot, who came to New England in the ship "Lyon, William Peirce Master," which arrived in Boston, November 3, 1631. He was born in Nasing, Essex, England, in 1604, " of godly parents." He was a fellow of Jesus College, Cambridge, where he received his B.A. degree, in 1622. Upon his arrival in Boston, Mr. Eliot was engaged to officiate in the church in the absence of Mr. Wilson, the pastor, then in England; and next year, his friends, to whom he was partly engaged before leaving England, having arrived and settled at Roxbury, he was called to their new church, and there ordained as their teacher, in 1632. His affianced wife arrived in the summer of that year, and they were married in October. Mr. Eliot soon evinced deep interest in the welfare of the Indians, and studied their language and habits, and especially their habits of thought in the direction of religion. 1 He went much amongst them, and, in order to a closer study of their language, hired one of good intelligence and spirit, to live at his house and 1 A very interesting little book has just now (May, 1896) been written by Mr. William Wallace Tooker, giving the biography of a Long Island Indian named Cheekunoe or Cockenoe, and pre senting a claim, with strong circumstantial evidence, that he was identical with the young Pequot captive of whom Mr. Eliot speaks, as living at Mr. Richard Calicott s in Dorchester, and who was the first to teach Mr. Eliot the Indian language, and his first interpreter. 390 KING PHILIP S WAK. assist in his studies. This Indian was Job Nesutan, and he was Mr. Eliot s chief assistant, but was killed at the beginning of Philip s War, while serving with the English against Philip, though he was then eighty-six years old. Mr. Eliot was eminent for his learning, especially in Hebrew, but was more eminent for his deep piety and self-consecration to his chosen work. He was particularly impressed with the great oppor tunity presented by the Indian tribes, for the spread of the /gospel of Christ. He marked with great concern the general indifference of the English to this opportunity for Christian work, but doubled his own endeavors to achieve the great purpose. There is no more glorious achievement in our annals, both for its heroic spirit and its vast labor, than his mastering of the Indian language and his translation of the Bible into the Indian tongue. In the meantime, the Indians in the neighbor hood of the settlements, had lived mostly at peace with the English, who had bought their lands, peltry, and labor, and paid in " truck," cheap clothes, fire-arms, " fire-water," etc. ; for the ,most part carrying on with them a system of deception and /extortion which we, in our reverence .for the Puritans and * Pilgrims, can hardly realize as possible. But we remember the confidence of their religious purpose, and their strong faith that God meant this country for them, and to " give the lands of the heathen for their inheritance ; " and they looked upon the Indians, as the Jews upon the Gentiles of old, as necessary ^/impediments to their onward course, to be used for their own advantage, when possible, or to be pushed aside at will. But all did not hold this opinion; and there were many among the leaders, in all the colonies, who from the first, regarded the rights of the Indians, and sought to help them; and many believed that they should be treated with justice under the laws, their rights maintained, and their spiritual welfare secured by the efforts of the Courts and the Churches. Many letters had been written by the settlers, to their friends in England, about the Indians arid their habits, and also of the remarkable success of the French Jesuits in converting them to / their religion; all which had the effect of stirring up a strong sentiment in England towards the evangelization of the Indians in New England, by the settlers. But greatest of all influences tending to this purpose, were the letters and tracts of Mr. Eliot. Several of the tracts are still preserved, and No. 1 was reprinted in 1865, for Joseph Sabin, New York. This " Tract I." was first printed in 1643, with the following title : New England s First Fruits in respect Conversion of Some First of the -I Conviction of divers \- of the Indians. Preparation of Sundry THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 391 The remainder of the title referred to the " Colledge at Cam bridge," etc. Later, three other tracts appeared, viz. : TRACT II. 1 The Day breaking if not the Sun rising of the Gospel with the Indians in New England. London, 1647. TRACT III. The clear sunshine of the Gospel breaking forth upon the Indians of New England. Thomas Shepard, London, 1648. TRACT IV. The glorious progress of the Gospel amongst the Indians of New England. Edward Winslow, London, 1649. There were eleven tracts in all, the last issued in 1671. In 1646, the General Court of Massachusetts passed an Act for >x" the Propagation of the Gospel amongst the Indians, and recom mending elders of the churches to take measures for carrying this into effect. In England, great interest was shown in the work, and Mr. Eliot received pecuniary assistance for establishing schools among the natives. Oliver Cromwell and other high dignitaries were greatly interested, and July 27, 1649, an Ordinance was passed by the " Long Parliament," forming " A Corporation for the Promoting and Propagating the Gospel of Jesus Christ in New , England." Nearly <12,000 in money was collected and in vested by this corporation, for the purposes set forth ; and Com missioners, and a Treasurer were appointed in New England to receive and expend the income, chiefly in Massachusetts, near Boston, but a portion in somewhat distant parts, and in New York. Upon the Restoration of Charles II. in 1660, this corpora tion was annulled, but by the extreme exertions of Hon. Robert Boyle, the company was reestablished with a royal charter, and j^-" kept up its work. The work was chiefly done by itinerant teachers, preachers and missionaries, and was kept up in various stations until the Revolution, after which, by the charter, it had to be transferred to the Provinces. 2 On October 28th, 1646, Mr. Eliot, by appointment, met a small congregation of Indians at Nonantum, now within the city of Newton, and preached to them in their own tongue. The meet ing was held in the wigwam of one named Waban, who was converted afterwards and became ruler of the " Praying Village " at Natick. Mr. Eliot labored thereafter unceasingly in behalf of the Indians, and chiefly through his wisdom, fidelity and devotion, the Christian Indian communities attained the size and efficiency, Reprinted in Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. xxiv. 1-23. 2 Interesting details concerning .this society will be found in the NEW ENGLAND HISTOBICAL 392 KING PHILIP S WAR, with which they were found at the beginning of Philip s war, their relations to which, we started mainly to consider. / From Major-General Gookin s " History of the Christian Ind ians " we learn nearly all that is known of their numbers, progress, conditions, sufferings and services during Philip s war. In the beginning he says : The Christian Indians in New England have their dwellings in sundry jurisdictions of the English Colonies, and that at a considerable dis tance from each other ; more particularly, 1st. Upon the Islands of Nantucket and Martha s Vineyard, in which two islands there inhabit many hundreds of them that visibly profess the Gospel. These Indians have felt very little of this war comparatively; for the English that dwell upon those Islands have held a good correspondence with these Indians all the time of the war, as they did before the war began, etc. Gen. Gookin says these " Island Indians " were accustomed to come up into the colonies to work in the summer for the settlers, and thus to supply themselves with clothing and other things which were very scarce upon the islands. When the war broke out these were all sent back to their homes with great loss, " be cause the English were so jealous, and filled with animosity against all Indians without exception." These, therefore, had no part in the war. 2nd. Another considerable number of Christian Indians live within the jurisdiction of New Plymouth, called the Cape Indians. He speaks of the assistance which these rendered the English in the war, but says that the English in the Plymouth colony were slow to employ them, being suspicious of them, as they were related to the Wampanoags, but there was no evidence of bad faith on their part in any instance. These, like the Island Indians, were outside active participation, except those who served with the English. He mentions next, the small number of those belonging to the Mohegans, and living at New Warwick, Connecticut, who had been taught by Rev. James Fitch, pastor of the church at Nor wich. There were about forty of these Indians who had become Christians in profession, through the efforts of Mr. Fitch ; while Uncas their chief, and his son Oneko, were bitterly opposed to the teaching and preaching among the Mohegans. But all were on friendly terms with the colonies, and served very gladly when ever the service would lead them against the Narragansets, their ancient implacable enemies. In their character as " Christian " Indians, they did not, therefore, attain much prominence. The chief body of the Christian Indians were lastly, those within the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Colony, " who were THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 393 taught and instructed in the Christian faith, by that indefatigable servant of God and minister of Christ, Mr. John Eliot ; " who, Gen. Gookin declares (in 1676-7), has labored among all the praying Indians in New England, more or less for thirty years. Of the Massachusetts Christian Indians he speaks in full, these having been under his special superintendence, and having been more concerned in the war, than any or all the rest. There were seven villages of these Christian Indians, all to the south of the Merrimac River, viz. : Wamesit, included in old Chelmsford, but now the city of Lowell. Nashobah, within the present town of Littleton. Okkokonimesit, or Marlborough. Hassannamesit, or Grafton. Makunkokoag, now Hopkinton. Natick, which has preserved its name to the present. Punkapog or Pakomit, which is now partly in Canton, Mass. These were the " Old Praying " villages, so-called, in distinc tion from some half dozen villages among the Nipmucks, called the " New Praying Towns," which latter, however, were just beginning, and soon fell off from the English, when their tribes joined in the war. A few of these only, came to Marlborough and joined the Christian Indians there, and remained until forced away by their tribes in hostility. These " Praying towns " were so located that they might have formed a line of defence, for the greater part of the Massachusetts towns upon the frontier; and it was proposed and urged by those who knew most about these Chris tian Indians that the forts, which in most cases they had built for themselves, under the direction of the English, should now be garrisoned by them, with English officers arid about one third of the garrison English soldiers ; and that these should be improved in scouting and guarding the frontiers. There is little doubt that this course would have saved most of the destruction and bloodshed, which took place in Massachusetts during the war ; but there was a furious popular prejudice against all Indians, and the majority of the population had no confidence in any attempt to employ Indians in military move ments. The Mohegans and Pequods, under Uncas, were in alliance with the English, and were bound to them by their hostility to the Narragansets, and though not Christian Indians, serve to illustrate the wisdom of the plan proposed in Massachusetts by Gen. Gookin. For the hostile Indians never dared to invade the Connecticut Colony to any notable extent, and burned only one small (and already deserted) village, during the whole war. In the beginning of the war, in the campaign at Mount Hope, we have seen that the Mohegans, with a few of the Christian 394 KING PHILIP S WAR. Indians from Natick, did all the execution which was wrought upon Philip in his retreat. A Christian Indian, John Sassamon, whom Gen. Gookin calls the x first Martyr of the Christian Indians," and whose story is told in the first chapter, ante page 25, was, we have seen, mur dered for his discovery of Philip s plans to the English. He was killed by Philip s order, and his murderers were afterwards arrested and executed by the English. It was this conviction and execu tion of the murderers of Sassamon, undoubtedly, which precipitated the war at least a year before Philip had planned its beginning. In the meantime, several of the Christian Indians had expressed their belief, that a plan was on foot for the general destruction of the English in the colonies ; and among these was Waban, a Nip- muck, at whose tent, amongst that people, Mr. Eliot had first preached to them in their own tongue. Waban himself, having been the first of his tribe to be converted, became afterwards the principal ruler of the Christian Indians at Natick. In April, 1675, Waban came to Gen. Gookin and warned him of Philip s intention, shortly to attack the English ; and again in May, he came and urged the same, and said that "just as soon as the trees were leaved out," the Indians would fall upon the towns. Very little attention was paid to these reports by the Governor and Council at Boston, and within a month the despatch came from Plymouth that the war had begun, account of which has been given. When the forces first marched out to Mount Hope, June 24th, 1675, Capt. Prentice took with him as guides three Christian Indians, viz., James Quanapohit ; Thomas Quanapohit, alias " Rumney marsh," his brother ; and Zachary Abram, all of whom, in that campaign, acquitted themselves bravely and well, despite the bitter hostility of many of the officers and soldiers, and their threats and open insults. If our soldiers had not been blinded by the popular clamor against all Indians, they would have seen in their experience with these scouts, and in the success of Uncas and his Indians a few days later, the utter uselessness of the noisy and clumsy infantry tactics of the English, in Indian war fare, whenever it was a march of invasion or pursuit. The enemy were always apprised of the coming of the troops for miles ahead. V The Connecticut officers and soldiers were readier to learn of their Indian allies, and were thus saved from many disasters, and secured many substantial victories. It is related, that in one of their marches into the enemy s country, one of the English soldiers wore squeaking shoes, and the Indian leader insisted upon his changing them for his own moccasins, while he carried the shoes, slung at his back, and himself went barefoot. Another of the sol diers wore a pair of leather breeches which being dry made a rust ling noise, which the Indian objected to, and refused to proceed, until the breeches were either removed or soaked in water, to prevent the rustling. The chief element of success in Indian THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 395 warfare was the secrecy and silence of their movements. We can appreciate, therefore, the immense advantage the early and general use of the friendly Indians, would have brought to the forces of the colony. It is probable that nearly all the fearful disasters which came to our troops, and the many defeats and disappointments which came to their plans, might have been prevented, but for that stupid prejudice and dis trust which shut out, and contemptuously ignored, the willing services of the Christian Indians. The Governor and Council, and most of the men in authority, and many of the chief officers like Gen. Denison, Major Willard, Major Savage, Capts. Prentice and Henchman, favored the use of friendly Indians ; indeed the Governor, July 2, 1675, gave orders to Gen, Gookin to raise a company of the Christian Indians, for service at Mount Hope. In pursuance of this, one-third of the able-bodied men in all the villages were mustered, and amounted to a company of fifty-two. This company was conducted to Mount Hope by Capt. Johnson and a small escort, and there delivered to the commander of the forces. All served twenty-five days, when one-half their number were dismissed, the rest remaining until the close of the campaign, as seen under the chapter devoted to Capt. Henchman s opera tions. All acquitted themselves satisfactorily to their officers. Some of them proved their sincerity in the barbarous way of that day ; for it is told that John Hunter, Thomas Quanapohit, and Felix, brought home to Gov. Leverett four of the scalps of ene mies slain by their hands in this campaign ; and Job Nesutan, the principal assistant of Mr. Eliot in his translation of the Bible, was killed. There can be little doubt that if in the pursuit of Philip into the Nipmuck country, the counsel of the Natick Indians had been heeded by Capt. Henchman, Philip and most of his company would have been destroyed, the Mohegans having on the previous day sorely pressed them and driven them into swamps. In the negotiations attempted by Capt. Hutchinson with Quabaug Indians, three of the Christian Indians were sent as guides and interpreters, viz. : George Memecho, and the brothers Joseph and Sampson, sons of old Robin Petuhanit, deceased. These all strongly advised against the advance, and warned the English, but were in the fight with Capt. Wheeler s men. George was captured and afterwards escaped, bringing back an intelligent account of the situation of the hostile tribes ; and it is probable that the entire force under Capt. Wheeler would have been destroyed but for the fidelity and skill of Joseph and Sampson, in conducting the retreat and avoiding the ambush set by the enemy. But, although this was known and vouched for by the officers, the popular feeling was so bitter, that these two were threatened and insulted by the soldiers, so that in utter discourage ment they fell away to the enemy at Hassanamesit, and Sampson was slain in fight by some friendly Indian scouts at Wachusett ; 396 KING PHILIP S WAR. while Joseph, having been captured, was sold into slavery at Jamaica, by some Boston merchants, but afterwards, by Mr. Eliot s importunity, was brought back again, though never re leased. Finally, Aug. 30, 1675, the Governor and Council, yielding to popular prejudice, against their own better judgment, decreed the disbandment of all Christian Indian companies in service ; and that they be restrained from all usual commerce with the English, and confined to their five villages ; and no one of them to travel more than one mile from the centre of such village except in the company of English, or on service. The five villages designated were Natick, Punquapog, Nashobah, Wamesit, and Hassanamesit. All Christian Indians were to repair to these villages. If any shall be found breaking these rules, the English are at liberty to shoot them down as enemies, or arrest them. It was recommended by the Court that several of the English should reside in each village, and this was earnestly desired by the Indians themselves, for their own protection ; but few could be found who were willing to withstand popular prejudice, as all who expressed sympathy or confidence towards these Indians were at once denounced as fools or traitors. Maj. Gen. Gookin, and even the saintly Eliot, were loaded with reproaches and threats, and insulted in the streets, because of their advocacy of the rights of the Christian Indians. John Watson, senior, and Henry Prentiss, of Cambridge, were with the Naticks for twelve weeks and gave certificate of their orderly, discreet and religious conduct. Although Watson had gone among them bitterly opposed to them, and sharing the common opinion against them, he was entirely converted by his experience, and declared it, though incurring much popular indignation by that course. Chief among the officers who led the hostile fury was Capt. Mosely in Boston, whose acts of persecution are set down in the chapter heretofore devoted to him, among which the breaking up of the village at Marlborough, and the imprisonment of the help less and harmless Indians, was perhaps the most open outrage sustained by any ; and it is to the credit of the magistrates that i/ they did not yield to the tremendous pressure of the people s rage, which by every device possible kept these poor creatures on trial for their lives, and imprisoned through many weeks. Early in October, the fever rose to its height, and the Court was impor tuned with many petitions to remove all the Christian Indians to one place, and put them under military guard. In spite of all proof and testimony, and all the favor of the Court, and the best conscience of the community, together with the advocacy of Gen. Gookin, Mr. Eliot, Corporal Thomas Swift, inspector at Punquapog, John Watson above mentioned, Mr. John Hoar of Concord, and others, the popular frenzy prevailed, and there is no doubt that, in several cases, fires were set and damage was THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 397 done, by inhabitants living near the " Praying Villages," who hated these Indians and desired their removal ; or often by hostile Indians who were skulking about in the neighborhood, and knew they had more to fear from the scouts of these Christian Indians than from all the troops of the English. October 18th, a party of the hostile Indians set fire to a haystack of Lieut. Richardson at Chelmsford, and managed so that the deed should appear to be done by the Wamesit Praying Indians, that so the English should remove them from their village, or so persecute them as to drive them to the enemy. This crime was afterward confessed by Nathaniel, a hostile Indian, who was taken at Dover by the strategy of Major Waldron, and executed at Boston. Although Lieut. Richardson declared that the " Praying Indians " were his warm friends, and would never injure him, their best friend in those parts, all availed nothing, the vulgar clamor prevailed, and the Court next day, passed an order for the troopers to bring down the Wamesits, and also the Punkapogs, upon some like occasion of complaint. This order of the Council was carried out by a strong guard of troopers and infantry. The whole number of the Wamesits, in their village, was one hundred and forty-five, of whom only thirty-three were able-bodied men. The original order was for all to be brought down ; but after the village had been broken up and all had been started on the way, it occurred to the Council that there were no sufficient accommodations for so large a body of people, especially Indians, and they prudently ordered all, save the able-bodied, back to their village. The thirty-three men were brought down to Charlestown, and lodged in the town- house, under guard, for a few days, and then all except a few, against whom some suspicions existed, were returned to their homes. The Punkapogs were brought as far as Dorchester, but after an interview with their ruler, William Ahaton, the Council sent all the tribe, save a few "suspects," home. About the first of October a great clamor was raised against the Naticks, accusing them of burning an old empty building in Dedham. It was a false device of their enemies to ruin them ; but in spite of all the better influence of the magistrates and ministers, the design practically succeeded. The popular fury so raged that the authorities and the friends of these Indians believed that it would be best to get them down to Deer Island. This was accom plished, and although Capt. Prentice, their good friend, conducted them down, and did all he could to protect them, their neighbors, the English, as soon as they had left their homes, immediately fell upon their villages and robbed them of everything which they had left behind ; and they had been obliged to leave their homes at an hour s notice. Their guns, hunting-gear, ammunition, stores, etc., all which was their own private property, were plundered by their English neighbors and never returned to 398 KING PHILIP S WAR. them. Rev. Mr. Eliot, Major Gookin and others of their friends, met them at the " Falls of the Charles River " and they were taken down to Deer Island in boats, with such of their poor belongings as they were able to bring along. Some two hundred in all were landed upon the bleak island, with scant clothing and food, and no shelter save such as they might construct. They suffered incredibly in many ways, being obliged to subsist largely upon clams, and such fish as might be taken from the shore. In November, the Hassanamesit Praying Village was attacked by the hostile Indians, and about fifty men and one hundred and fifty women and children captured. They had been disarmed by the English, and so abused and threatened by their English neighbors that many went willingly, as they were persuaded that the English were mostly hostile to them, and meant to destroy them. James Speen and Job Kattenanit escaped and brought the news to the English. Their ruler " Capt. Tom," alias " Wuttasacomponom," had been a tried and trusted friend of the English, but had been so insulted and threatened by some of them that he yielded to the enemy, and many others followed with him. The pastor of their church, Joseph Tuckapawillin, and his aged father Naoas, went unwillingly and sorrowfully. By this stroke the cause of christianizing the Indians met with a very severe check, there being three villages, viz., Hassanamesit, Magunkog and Chobonokonomum, broken up. Properly armed and garrisoned with a few English, along with the Indians, these villages would have been a strong defence in the war. It was upon this disaster that Capts. Henchman and Syll came to Hassanamesit, and the record of their expedition shows that all the success they had was achieved by the five Natick scouts, of whom three were Thomas and James Quanapohit and Eleazar Pegin, who were highly commended for their services, their courage and fidelity, by their officers. But the hate and prejudice was so bitter among the soldiers, that Capt. Syll was forced to send three of the Indians back home. For lack of these, Lieut. Philip Curtis lost his life uselessly, his company being left with out any scouts. James and Thomas Quanapohit remained in Capt. Syll s company. When Job Kattenanit escaped from Hassanamesit he left his three children with the hostile Indians, and was granted a pass to go into the woods to try to recover them ; but meeting with some of Capt. Henchman s soldiers, he was seized and stripped of most of his clothing and his arms, and then by the Captain, to still the rage of the soldiers and populace, he was sent down to Boston, and there thrown into prison, no note being taken of his pass from Major Gookin. He suffered here from the foulness of the prison and the crowded situation, and the insults and perse cutions to which they were subjected. In the meantime the Wamesits were meeting with another THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 399 disaster, in the burning of a barn of hay, by some hostile Indian or Englishman, for the purpose of casting reproach upon them. Lieut. Thomas Henchman, and Lieut. James Richardson, whose barn was burnt, were friends of these Indians and in charge of them, and believed them innocent ; but some of the English at Chelmsford secretly organized a party who went to the wigwams and shot down five women, seriously wounding them and killing a boy outright. The assault was unqualified, brutal murder. The lad was a son of a Sagamore, and grandson of a worthy old Sachem, Tahatawarre. The mother, who was among the danger ously wounded, was the daughter of that staunch friend of the English, "Sagamore John." This horrible outrage greatly exercised the Council; and the murderers, two fellows named Largin and Robins, who were shown to be the ones who had fired their guns, loaded with shot, into the crowd, were arrested. But notwithstanding the efforts of the magistrates and ministers, with all the best men of the colony, no jury could be found to convict them ; and after an extended imprisonment they were set free. _ By this act the rest of the Indians were so disheartened and frightened that they all forsook their villages and went away towards Pennacook to join Wannalancet. Sam Numphow and John Lyne, their rulers, sent back a written answer, by the mes sengers of the Council (sent to induce them to return, and prom ising protection), that they had confidence in the Council s good will, but feared the people, and so were going away " to the French." This last was the sharpest point of reproach, as it compared the success of the Catholics with the notable failure of the Protestants to convert the Indians. But being in straitened circumstances, and earnestly reassured by the Council, they were induced to return after a few weeks ; and Lieut. Thomas Henchman was placed in charge as their guardian, and Major Willard, Mr. Eliot and Major Gookin went up and visited them. Symon Betokom, one of their teachers, told Mr. Eliot that while in the woods they held their worship three Sabbaths, in their rude way. He said, " The first Sabbath I read and taught the people from Psalm 35 ; the second, from Psalm 46 ; and the third, from Psalm 118 ; " a pathetic picture, showing somewhat the opportunity which the prejudice and greed of the Puritan masses lost to the cause of Protestant Christianity. Sometime after the Naticks were taken to Deer Island, the Punkapogs were also brought down, making the number there, all told, five hundred. Although the magis trates, and their faithful friends Eliot and Gookin, did all in their power to help them, these poor souls suffered terribly from cold and hunger during the winter. After the great fight at Narraganset, it was greatly desired to learn the position and movements of the Indians to the westward, towards the Connecticut River. Major Gookin was requested to enlist two of the Indians at Deer Island to go as spies amongst 400 KING PHILIP S WAK. the enemies. He selected Job Kattenanit and James Quanapo- hit. These two were sent away into the woods and got among the Indians at Brookfield about January 3d, and by a plausible story of escape from Deer Island and of their sufferings there and their wish to release their friends from that place, were received, and remained for a month amongst the enemies, and the story of their sojourn contains nearly all that is known of the events dur ing that important time, when the Narragansets were coming northward and all the tribes were gathering for the struggle of the coming Spring. Upon January 24th James returned, fearing mischief from Philip, who had sent for Mautamp to bring James up to him. James escaped with the assistance of Job, who wished to remain until able to bring off his children. James came into the house of Isaac Williams, at the Falls of the Charles River, and came with him, the next day, to Major Gookin, and to the Council, to whom he made report of his sojourn, and the position and numbers, disposition and purpose of the Indians, allied with Philip. His report was communicated to Connecticut Colony and is preserved in their archives. James told of the plan of the Indians to assault the frontier towns, beginning with Lancaster, in about three weeks time. Job Kattenanit escaped and came in on February 9th, confirming James s account and reporting the war-party already marching upon Lancaster. Acting upon his report, messengers were despatched to Marlborough, Concord and Lancaster, and Capt. Wadsworth with forty men marched from Marlborough, in time to find the bridge burned, as James had said the Indians planned, but escaping the ambush laid by the regular road, the English were guided around by another bridge and were able to beat the enemy off from the garrison-house owned by Mr. Cyprian Stevens, and thus to secure the town from entire destruction. If the warning of James had been heeded, the destruction of the Rowlandson garrison-house, and the death and captivity of its occupants, might easily have been averted. But for all the hardships and fidelity of these two, the vulgar prej udice was so great that the Governor and Council were again forced to yield, and these faithful men returning from their service were sent down again to Deer Island, to share the priva tions of their brethren. And not only against these, but against their friends, Eliot, Gookin and Danforth, the blind fury raged, and the lives of these true men were attempted in a cowardly manner on several occasions. In February, the Wamesits, fearing the hostile Indians on the one hand, and their English neighbors on the other, petitioned to be removed to some safer place within the Colony. The Court promised, but neglected to take care of them, and the great body of them fled to Pennacook, to Wanna- lancet, being forced to leave behind for the time some half a dozen of their aged and blind, whom they considered safe, being helpless and harmless, After they were gone, these poor creatures THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 401 were found and brutally murdered (being burned to death, as appeared, within their wigwam) by two brutes of the English, against whom nothing direct could be proved, but who were quite well known by the public, as they rather enjoyed such notoriety than feared it among their fellows. In this retreat of the Wamesits, Sam Numphow, their ruler, and Mystic George, died from exposure and famine. Upon the partial destruction of Medfield, February 21st, as James and Job had foretold in their account of the enemies programme, the / popular shame and spleen raged not against the stupidity and * inefficiency of the two companies of soldiers mostly asleep in the houses of the town, without outposts or scouts, but against the inoffensive Indians at Deer Island; and a plot was laid by a large number of the most violent and dissolute of the lower classes gathered in and about Boston. The plot was to go over to Deer Island from " Pulling Point " in large boats, and fall upon the defenceless Indians with indiscriminate slaughter. The horrible plot was discovered, and a few of the ringleaders summoned before the Court, which frustrated the cowardly design. The Nashobah Christian Indians were at Concord in charge of Mr. John Hoare, and were quiet, peaceful and industrious. The popular discontent could not bide their peace, and the more hostile took advantage of the presence of Capt. Mosely, and enlisted his interference with them. He, with his rough soldiers, came into the church on the Sabbath, and after the services, spoke to the congregation in his haughty and insolent way, declaring his intention to break up the Indian village and carry all the "heathen " down to Boston. He carried out his threat the next day without any authority, and against the remonstrance of that honorable Christian gentleman, Mr John Hoare, who held com mission from the Court for their care. He broke into their great house, which belonged to Mr. Hoare, plundered the poor helpless creatures of all they had, insulted and abused Mr. Hoare, and sent the Indians, to the number of fifty-eight, of whom twelve only were able-bodied men, down/ to Boston under a guard of some twenty of his rough and brutal soldiers ; and sent down an insolent letter to the Council in account of his action. This high-handed breach of authority on the part of a mere captain stirred the indignation of the whole Court, but though they ^ denounced his act in the assembly freely, so great was his i popularity among the lower classes that it was not deemed expe dient to reprimand him, or interfere with his command. The Indians were sent down to their countrymen at the Island, robbed and abused ; and the captain went on his way unrebuked. But the Corporation in London came to the aid of the friends of the Christian Indians, and their support greatly encouraged the better sentiment of the colony ; for they not only sent sup plies and money for the Indians, but letters came inquiring into / V/r 402 KING PHILIP S WAK. the treatment of the Christian Indians. When the popular cry was raised that the Indians at Deer Island should be transported out of the country or destroyed, the General Court presented a bold front, and by public proclamation declared these Christian Indians to be the allies and friends of the English by the olden treaty of 1643, made with their fathers, and never to this day broken by them or their children. This firmness did much to enlighten and allay popular prejudice. When Major Savage took command of the army to march to the West in March, 1675-6, he made one condition, that he should have a number of the Indians at Deer Island for guides. In pursuance of this arrangement, Major Gookin procured for him James Quanapohit, Job Kattenanit, James Speen, Andrew Pitimee, and William Ahaton. All these were men of tried courage and fidelity, and were greatly elated that they would now have a chance under Major Savage to prove their truth and worth. But when the troops were at Marlborough, Job was per mitted to go forward towards Hassanamesit to meet his children in the place appointed by them, when he escaped; and it was hoped that those of his tribe who had come lately from the enemy could give later information ; but when Capt. Mosely knew of this he made a great tumult, and so stirred up the violent spirits among the soldiers that a revolt was threatened, and it became necessary to send away after Job to bring him back, and Capts. Wadsworth and Syll rode after him with all speed with James Quanapohit as guide; but Job returned to the forces without meeting his friends, though they had been at the place appointed. These poor wanderers were taken, coming to the English camps, by some of Capt. Benj. Gibs s men shortly afterwards, and brought into camp with great ado as being a grand prize, but Major Savage found them to be Job s friends and received them civilly and sent them back to Marlborough, where they had to stop a night, and there they were beset by a mob of frantic English women, and so threatened and abused that four of them escaped in the night. It will be remembered that many soldiers, and especially rhose of Capt. Mosely s " volunteer " company, were of the most eckless and disreputable class in the colony, and many of them used the occasion of public service as a cloak for any sort of crime. They robbed the defenceless Indians, and to hide their rime raised a storm of fear against them by their falsehoods. At the same time they stirred up all the worst passions of the people, and through these sought to intimidate the Indians to escape, or provoke them to some act of resistance which would prevent their demanding back their stolen property. On this occa sion at Marlborough, the soldiers had stripped the poor creatures of everything, and had even robbed the faithful Indian minister of the pewter communion cup given him by Mr. Eliot. The four THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 403 who had made their escape were Joseph Tuckapawillin s wife, who left an infant behind, in her panic ; their son, a lad of twelve years, following with his mother; also another woman, a widow, who had cared for Job s children in their captivity, and her daughter. All these fugitives were brought in by Tom Dublet a week later, when he went into the woods to negotiate with the enemy for the return of prisoners. The lad died in the woods from hunger and exposure. These were sent down to Deer Island, where their companions had already been sent. Capt. Nicholas Paige entertained these poor Indians at his house in Boston, as they passed through the town on their way to the Island. He was a firm friend to the Christian Indians and a very independent man. Job afterwards married the woman who had so faithfully cared for his children in their captivity. The six Indians who went as guides to the army acted their part with courage and fidelity, and were commended by Major Savage ; while Mr. No well, the chaplain of the army in this expedition, wrote of them : I look at it as a great rebuke of God that we should miss our enemy as we did when we were at Menumesse. If we had barkened to those six Indians whom we took from Deer Island, we might have prevented that error. They have behaved themselves like sober honest men since they abode with us, which hath made me look after them more carefully. The whole testimony of the better-minded tends to show that the chief cause of the great disappointment and disaster of this expedition was the fanatical prejudice and violent insubordination of Mosely and his adherents ; and there is little doubt that if a company of the Indians at Deer Island had been raised (as Capt. Henchman, who was in charge of them, had often proposed, as he had found them ready and willing to serve), the campaign would have been far different in its event. The six Indians were so insulted and abused by their enemies in the army, who taunted them with having been the cause of the defeat, etc., that they returned to the Island utterly discour aged ; so that when a messenger was needed to go out to the enemy to treat for the return of Mrs. Rowlandson, not one could be found for a long time, until finally Tom Dublet, mentioned above, consented, and upon April 3d, 1676, went into the woods and returned on the 12th, bringing a letter of agreement from the enemy. We have read, in chapter XX. above, that the " Council de cided to raise and equip a company from these Christian Indians, placing them in command, of Capt. Hunting, to the number of forty." But when this number of able-bodied men were drawn forth from the Christian Indians, there were left upon Long Island, 404 KING PHILIP S WAR. whither they were now removed, some four hundred old men, women and children. After great suffering, and many efforts of their friends, these poor souls were brought up to Cambridge by the authority of the Court, and through the influence of the " Right Honorable Corporation " in London, which furnished the means through Major Gookin. Mr. Thomas Oliver, a good friend of these Indians, offered a commodious place upon his farm, not far from the Charles River, where they might find convenience of fishing, fuel and planting; and near by there was his large garrison-house to which they might easily retreat in any time of , / danger. The Punkapog Indians upon their removal from the Islands were settled at " Brush Hill " in Milton, under the care of Quarter-master Thomas Swift. The Indians at Mr. Oliver s remained through the Summer, but broke up into smaller com- / panics after harvest for greater convenience, settling at Nonan- V turn, Punkapog, Cowate (the fall of Charles River), Natick, Medfield, Concord, and Namkeake (near Chelmsford). According to the official report of Major Daniel Gookin, pre sented to the Council, November 10, 1676, the Punkapog Indians, " residing about Milton, Dorchester and Brantree," were mostly employed among the English to cut cord-wood, etc. Their num ber was one hundred and seventy-five thirty-five men and one hundred and forty women and children. The Naticks were divided into four companies. The first lived at Medfield, with James Rumneymarsh and his kindred, and num bered twenty-five, including five men. The second company were \J near Natick garrison-house, under the inspection of Andrew Dewin and his sons, who desired to live near them ; their number was about fifty ten men and forty others. The third company, with Waban, lived near the falls of the Charles River, near the house of Joseph Miller and not far from the home of Capt. Prentice, their number about sixty, of whom twelve were men. The fourth company dwelt at Nonantum Hill, near Lieut. Trowbridge and John Coones. A portion of this company were living at Muddy River, near John White s ; and separate families near the houses of Mr. Thomas Oliver, Mr. Sparhawk, and Daniel Champney, and were employed by these gentlemen to cut wood and build stone walls, while the women were taught and then employed as spin ners. This fourtli company numbered about fifteen men and sixty women and children, in all seventy-five. The Naticks, numbering thus some two hundred and ten, in cluded the most of those who had not been scattered, by flight, to the hostile Indians, by being sold into service to individual families of the English, or by death, who had formerly belonged in the villages of Hassanamesit, Magunkog, Maryborough, and Wamesit. At the time the report was made, nearly all the able-bodied men of the Naticks were with Capt. Hunting at the Eastward. THE CHRISTIAN INDIANS. 405 The Nashobah or Concord Indians lived at Concord, and were under the direction of the military officers and Selectmen of the town ; their number about fifty. The Pennacooks, and those who adhered to Wannalancet, lived at Dunstable, under the direction of Mr. Jonathan Tyng, and in his absence the care devolved upon Robert Parris. The number of these last was about sixty. A small company dwelt at Ipswich, under the town authorities, their number was about twenty-five. Besides these there were separate families, living with the English, as servants. Mention is made of the families of a Mr. Gates of Watertown, Justinian Holden, Corporal Humand (Hammond?), and Wilson at Shaw- shin ; and these numbered about forty souls. Major Gookin estimated the whole number of Christian Indians / at this time to be five hundred and ninety-seven, of whom one ^ hundred and seventeen were men. Subsequently the scattered and ever dwindling companies were / gathered at Natick, where an Indian church had been established, and an Indian town was regularly incorporated. The town was first laid out in 1651, and was governed by Indian officers under a committee chosen by the General Court. The descendants of Waban, the principal ruler at Natick at the first establishment, continued to be the chief officers of the town for two generations. The town remained nominally an Indian town until 1762, when it passed into the government of the English. The last of the Natick Indians died before the close of 1826. XXVIII. THE NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIPS, GRANTEES AND CLAIMANTS. IT will be remembered that when, on December 10th, 1675, the forces of Massachusetts Colony were mustered on Dedham Plain, to march against the Narraganset fort, a proclamation was made to the soldiers, in the name of the Governor, that, " if they played the man, took the fort, and drove the enemy out of the Narraganset country, which is their great seat, they should have a gratuity of land, besides their wages." We find that after they had so valiantly performed the service, and the war was long past, the soldiers were not forgetful of their claim, nor the colony unmindful of its obligations. On June 4th, 1685, the following petition was presented to the General Court, then in session at Boston. The body of the petition, which was for the grant of land which had been prom ised, is not given here, but only the names contained upon the document: Petition of those who were soldiers in Lynn, in the Nipmugg Country, and at the Narragausett Fort. Wm. Basset, Timothy Brade, Robert Drivar, Phillip Kertland, Jno. Davis, Robert Pottar, Sr. John Edmunds, John Hawcks, Widdow Hathorn, Jeremiah Swaine, Samuell Lambson, Wm. Raymond, LYNN. John Lynzey, Andrew Townsend, Samuel Mowers, Samuel Graves, Daniel Goff, Nathl. Ballard, Daniel Johnson, Joseph Mansfield, Samuel Tarbox, READING. James Pike Junr. Samuell Damon, BEVERLY. John Raymond jr. Wm. Dodds jr. Samuel Johnson, Jno. Farrington, Jonathan Look, John Richards, Joseph Brade, Joseph Collins, Henry Rhoades, James Nicolls, William Robbins, John Dodds jr. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIPS. 407 SALEM VILLAGE. Joseph Herrick, Thomas Raymond, HINGHAM. Samuel Linckhorne jr. Joshua Lazell, John Langor, John Bull, Mass. Archives, vol. 112, p. 398. To this petition the Court made the following answer : In ans r to the petition of W m Basset, Jn Lynsey, Robert Porter, Sen r , & twenty-two more inhabitants of Lyn, Jeremiah Swayne, Sam 11 Damon, Sam Lambson, W m Robbins, James Pyke Jun., James Nicholls of Reading, W m Raymond & 5 more of Beverly, & Samuel Lyncolne & three more, of Hingham, as on y c peticon on file, the Court Judgeth it meet to grant the peticoners a tract of Land, in the Nipmug country, of eight miles square, for their encouragement & others that were serviceable to the country in the late Indian warr, to a competent number, who shall see meet to joyue themselves to them in order to the making of a plantation or township, provided it be laid out so as not to interfere with any former grants, & that an orthodox minister, on their settlement of thirty families, be settled within the space of fower yeares next coming. Mass. Colonial Records, vol. V. p. 487. There seems to have been little further action in regard to the settlement of this grant, and few of those entitled to land ever settled. The place was remote from the Massachusetts settlements, and the conditions demanded actual settlers in such numbers and with such limitations, as to prevent, rather than en courage, settlement. In the following years there were many interests nearer home ; and it was not until nearly forty years had elapsed, that the interest in this old matter was revived. The colony of Massachusetts had then absorbed that of Plymouth, and together these constituted the " Province of Massachusetts Bay." July 1, 1727, a petition of Samuel Chandler and Jacob Wright was presented to the General Court of the Province, in behalf of themselves and a great number of other persons, recalling the action of the General Court of the Colony, in 1685, " which grant was not pursued to effect," and now " for as much as the Petition ers were either personally present at the Fort and Fight at Narra- ganset, or descendants from those that were, or in the strictest alliance with them ; " " therefore, praying that a Grant may be made them of such vacant Lands as may serve the Petitioners for Settlement, under such Restrictions & Limitations as this Court shall Judge fit." In the House of Representatives, in answer, it was resolved, " that Major Thomas Tileston, Capt. John Alden, Mr. Edward 408 KING PHILIP S WAR. Shove, Mr. Samuel Healey, of Newton, and Mr. Samuel Chandler of Concord, be a Committee, fully authorized & impowered to sur vey and lay out the Contents of eight Miles square in some of the unappropriated lands of this Province, and that the said lands be granted and disposed of to the Persons (whether officers or sol diers) belonging to this Province, who were in the service of their Country in the said Narragauset War, or to their legal Rep resentatives, as a Reward for their publick Services, and is in full satisfaction for the Grant formerly made them by the Great and General Court." It was also voted that the Committee " give public notice in the News Letter or otherwise, six months, at least, before their meeting, when and where they intend to meet, so that every Officer and soldier, who served in the said War or the lawful Representatives of such as served and since deceased, may have an opportunity to enlist their Names with the said Committee," etc. When the Committee have completed the lists, the Grantees are to meet " as soon as may be and select a committee to regulate the affairs of the Propriety." The Grantees are to be obliged " to settle sixty families thereon, with a learned Orthodox Minister within the space of seven years." Failing to fulfil these conditions the grantees forfeit all their rights under this grant. When the enlisting had proceeded some time, it was found that the number of claimants was much larger than at first sup posed, so that the committee was instructed to lay out " two Tracts of lands for Townships of the contents of six miles square," etc. The same conditions were imposed as in the first order. The next year, May 29th, 1728, an order was passed that public notices be posted in every town in the province, as well as given in the News Letter. The following is the notice posted in the towns : These may certify to whom it may concern. That the General Assembly of this Province, at their Session begun and held the 29th. of May 1728, passed a Resolve for granting two Tracts for Townships of the contents of Six Miles square each, to the persons, whether Officers or soldiers, belonging to this Province, who were in the service of their country in the Narraganset War ; And all such Officers and Soldiers now surviving, and the legal representatives of those that are deceased, are desired to give or send into the Secreta ries office Lists of their Names and Descents, to be laid before the General Court at their next Fall Session. J. WILLARD, Seer. Mass. Archives, vol. 72, p. 367. The committee appointed by the General Court, viz. : John Chandler, jr., Edward Shove, and John Hobson, assisted by Mr. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIPS. 409 Jonas Houghton, surveyor ; with John Bennett, Joseph Wheelock, John Goss, and Stephen Mighill, chainmen, all sworn by Mr. Justice Wilder, laid out and presented a plan of the two Town ships. The first was laid out " adjoining the towns of Rutland and Lunenburgh additional grants, and elsewhere adjoining the Province Land," and containing about 23,286 acres. This was Narraganset No. 2, or Wachuset; incorporated as Westminster, April 26, 1770. The second township was laid out on the south side of Souhegan River, the east boundary being about four or five miles from the Merrimac River, westward, containing 24,457, which is 1,417 acres more than the contents of six miles square, but which the committee think ought to be allowed to make up for ponds, etc. This township became Narraganset No. 3, or " Souhegan West," and was under Massachusetts Government until 1741, when, by the adjustment of the line between Massachusetts and New Hampshire, it was found to fall within the limits of the latter province. It became the town of Amherst, N.H. April 11, 1729. A committee was appointed by the Court to examine and decide upon the lists of grantees or claimants ; and reported the following December 20th. And the Court then accepted the report, and ordered "that the said Claimers or Grantees meet at Boston, if the small Pox be not there ; If it be, then at Cambridge, on the first Wednesday of June next ensuing." The small-pox was in Boston at the time set. It was found that the lists were growing larger, but that the claimants were so widely scattered, that much confusion would result without further time and more accurate investigation. The time of meeting was extended to the "next Fall Session." At that session of the Court, December 30, 1730, a petition was presented by Thomas Tileston and others as a committee on behalf of the grantees and claimants, showing that the lists of the grantees was now so large, that the land already granted would give to each, such small portion, that there would be no object in settling the lots; and praying that the grant be enlarged, and a longer time allowed in which to investigate and adjust claims. In answer to this petition, the House of Representatives voted to grant an extension of time, and to grant " to each one hun dred and twenty claimants, a township of the contents of six miles square," under the above mentioned limitations and con ditions. The Council did not concur with this vote, nor in a similar vote passed in the House upon a petition, the following February, but insisted that the lands already granted in the two townships, was sufficient. The matter continued thus in disagreement between the two branches, until January 19, 1731, when the House sent up to the 410 KING PHILIP S WAK. Council a very outspoken, earnest and eloquent message, in behalf of the grantees, which, even at its full length, deserves a place here. A Message, from the House of Representatives of the General Court of the Province of Massachusetts Bay, advocating a liberal answer to the petition of the Narraganset Soldiers and their descendants. In the House of Representatives Ordered, that the following message be sent up to the Honorable Board. Viz. Whereas, There have been several Endeavours, to accommodate the Narrhaganset Soldiers and their Descendants with a sutable quantity of Land for then Settlement as an acknowledgment & Reward of their great Service to this Country which have hitherto failed of the desired Success ; This House have thought it might tend to promote a good understanding & Harmony in this Court to lay before the Honorable Board, Wherefore it is resolved that the Representatives have come into the Grant of a tract of Six miles square to Each number of One hundred & Twenty persons which they have made this Session in answer to the Petition of Thomas Tilestone & others a Committee in behalf of themselves & the rest of the Soldiers & their Descendants, who were in the Narraganset War. And one great Reason is that there was a Proclamation made to the Army in the name of the Government (as living Evidences very fully testify) when they were mustered on Dedham Plain where they began their March, that if they played the man, took the Fort & Drove the Enemy out of the Narraganset Country, which was their great Seat, that they should have a gratuity in Land besides their Wages ; and it is well known, & our Sitting to hear this petition is an Evidence that this was done ; and as the Conditions have been performed, certainly the promise in all Equity & Justice ought to be fulfilled ; and if We Consider the Difficulties these brave men went through in Storming the Fort in the Depth of Winter, & the pinching wants they afterwards underwent in pursuing the Indians that escaped through a hideous Wilderness famously known throughout New England to this day by the Name of the hungry March ; and if we further Consider that until this brave though small army thus played the Man, the whole Country was filled with Distress & fear, & We trembled in this Capital Boston itself & that to the Goodness of God to this army We owe our Fathers & our own Safety & Estates, We cannot but think that those Instru ments of Our Deliverance & Safety ought to be not only justly but also gratefully & generously rewarded & even with much more than they prayed for, If we measure what they receive from us, by what we enjoy and have received from them. We need not mention to the Honorable Board the Wisdom Justice and Generosity of Our Mother Country & of the ancient Romans, on such Occasions, Triumph, Orations, Hereditary Honors & privileges all the Riches, Lands & Spoils of War and conquered Countrys have not been thought to great for those to whom they have not owed more if so much as We do to those our Deliverers : & We ought further to observe what greatly adds to their merit that they were not Vaga bonds & Beggars & Outcasts, of which Armies are sometimes con siderably made up, who run the Hasards of War to Avoid the Danger AMERICAN PATRIOTISM IN 1731. 411 of Starving : so far from this that these were some of the best of Our men, the Fathers & Sons of some of the greatest & best of Our families and could have no other View but to Serve the Country & whom God was pleased accordingly in every remarkable manner to Honour & Succeed. Of these things the Honorable the General Court of the Late Colony of the Massachusetts in those days was not insen sible & accordingly gave to the Soldiers being upward of Five Hundred, about Two Thirds of the Army that went from the Massachusetts, & the late Colony of Plimouth a Tract of about forty thousand acres in the Nipmug Country, this or the value of it these Soldiers would be contented with & take in their Brethren of Plimouth too, tho that should take away two thirds of what was granted them & would after that have more in value than what they now ask for in all, for every one own that 40000 acres in the Heart of the Country as the Nipmug Country is, is of more Value than five times that quantity remote in the Borders & in Danger if there should be a french War, as is and would be the Case with all the unappropriated Lands of the province, which they now ask for. It is hoped that the neglect of these petitioners so long or the pro vinces having disposed of the Nipmug Country to others and so defeated their ancient Grants will not be thought to wear out any more than it rewards their merit. The Grant seems to be made in acknowledgment both of their promise & of their fulfilling the Condition and being well entitled to it, & there is great Reason to fear that publick Guilt would ly upon the Country if we should neglect and continue in the Breach of the promise after it has been made & omitted for above fifty years. As to the late Grant of two Townships to Seven or Eight hundred of these Soldiers ; It is so far below the Value of the Land they Con quered, & the Price the province had for it when it was sold, & the money divided to Colonies that carried on the War: It is such a Pittance of what they obtain for us, so exceedingly beneath what the province has defeated them of which was granted to about Two thirds of them in the Nipmug Country, that it is rather mocking and deriding them to offer it. Beyond what has been offered it should be Considered to Grant the present, and give such a quantity of Land as may be worth Settling, & upon Conditions of bringing forward Townships, is much more agreeable to Charter & for the Public Good than to Give away Tracts of Land & suffer & even tempt men to let them ly waste & unimproved, for in the way that has been proposed & in which some Progress has been made, the Lands will be divided into such scraps that they will not be worth receiving. Mass. Court Records, January 19th, 1731. This message accompanied the renewed petition of Thomas Tileston and others, for the soldiers, upon which action had already been taken by the House, and it was now sent up again to the Council for concurrence, and there finally received favorable action June 9, 1732. Definite action was taken, and it was voted by both branches that every hundred and twenty of those grantees enrolled whose claims have been allowed shall have a 412 KING PHILIP S WAR. township of six miles square under the conditions formerly stated. The work of gathering the lists of names, and adjusting the claims was no light task, as appears from the references in the Court Records. There was much confusion in the minds of the peo ple as to the proper method of application, and many of the heirs made application in their own names while the soldier was still alive. Finally, April 26, 1733, a list of eight hundred and forty gran tees was presented and accepted, and it was voted to grant the seven townships necessary to satisfy the demands of this number of grantees. The grantees were divided into " Proprieties " or companies, according to their present residences, if alive, or their heirs, law fully claiming. The eldest male heir had the first right, and after him the eldest female heir. The grantees were ordered to meet as they should be classified, and choose committees to regulate each Township. On February 11, 1733-4, plans were presented by the Com mittee of the General Court of two Townships, lying between the Saco and Pesumpscot Rivers, contiguous to each other ; each of the contents of six miles square, with allowances for ponds and previous grants to Hill and Tyng. The township next to the Saco was assigned to the " Ipswich Society," so called, which was made up of the grantee residents of Ipswich, Newbury, Rowley, Haver- hill, Salisbury, Amesbury, Methuen, Hampton, Greenland, and Berwick. In June, 1732, at a meeting in Boston, they had chosen Philemon Dane and John Gains of Ipswich, and Col. Joseph Gerrish of Newbury, as a committee to regulate the business of this township, which became No. 1. The following list is alphabetically arranged (initials only) from the lists in the Proprietor s Record Book, as published in the excellent volume of Capt. Win. F. Goodwin, entitled " Nar- raganset Township, No. 1." Different committees had different methods of keeping their records, and since the original list, returned by the Committee to the General Court, was partially lost, the greater part of it, in deed, it has been necessary to gather the lists mostly from the old Township Record-Books. In this Record-Book of No. 1, there are two lists, but the grantees are identical in both, while the two lists represent the first and second divisions of lots, the claimant being different, in some cases, in the two. In such cases I have arranged both claimants, and sometimes three, under the one grantee. Where any relationship is mentioned, I have car ried the fact into the space after claimant s name. I have indicated the fact that a new name occurs in the second list, by the mark (2). NARRAGANSET NO. 1. 413 GRANTEES AND CLAIMANTS OF NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 1, NOW THE TOWN OF BUXTON, ME. 1 Soldier Grantees. Claimants. AIT T>- i, ^ Samuel Allin. Allm, Richard Joseph Titcomb (2). Jon a . Fellows. Andrews, John Eben Hidden (2). Adams, Simon Capt. John Fowl (2). Daniel Adams. ( Nicholas Cheany. Asa (Acy) , John -j Joseph Hale. ^ Moses Hale. Appleton, Sam 1 ., Major . . . Isaac Appleton, jr. AIT -nr-iT f Benjamin Merrill. Allm, William { Elisha Allin (2). Brocklebanck, Sam 1 ., Capt. . . Stephen Mighill. r f John Hobson. Brown, Thomas SAUI c- t,/->\ (Abraham Somerby (2). Brown, John ("of Haverhill"), Rev d . Jedediah Jewett. Brown, Joseph John Fowle, jr. Brown, William Richard Dole. Boynton, John Israel Read. r> /-i u ( James Chute. Brown, Gershom < ^ ,,. , ( George Thirlo. Brown, John John Brown, son. Brown, Edmund Enoch Titcomb. f Aaron Potter (2). Baker John I John Baker, grandson. Burnom, James Thomas Burnom, son. Brier, Richard Bodwell, Henry Boynton, Joshua W m . Boyuton, son. Bartlet, Christopher .... j Christopher son ( Joseph Peasley (2). f Nath 1 . Clark Clark, Jonathan -] Caleb Moody, jr. (2) . ( Edmund Greenleaf (2) . Chase, Moses Sam 1 . Chase, son. Cross, George William Cross, son. Curriour, Richard j Timothy Curriour, son. ( Daniel Currier (2). Cogswell, Edward ..... Emerson Cogswell. Colcut, Edward ? r\u ,v u T u /o\ ( Obadiah Johnson (2) . 1 This list is confirmed by an original list, found among the papers of Rev. Paul Coffin. 414 KING PHILIP S WAR. Soldier Grantees. Claimants. T^ , T>~V, f Solomon Lakeman. Down, Robert { ^ , T , ^ ,_. ( Capt. John Fowle (2). Dane, Philemon Philemon Dane, son. Durell Moses I Natn Durell son - ( Capt. John Greenleaf, jr. Davis, Zechariah John Bartlet, jr. r^ r ( Ephraim Dow, son. Dow, Ihomas < *,*.,, . /0 . ( Nathan Simons (2). Denison, John John Denison, son. Davis, John Jonathan Davis, son. Elsley. William ...... Capt. W m . Elsley. Elsley (Ilsley), Isaac .... Capt. W m . Elsley, son. Easmon, Thomas ..... f Jonathan Easmon son. ( Nathan Simons (2) . Emerson, Nath 1 ...... | Stephen Emerson son. ( John Thurston (2). Emery, Jonathan ..... j Jf n Emery, son ( Stephen Emery (2). -c^ -D , \ Gershom Frazer. Emons, Peter ...... { a . , ... ( Stephen Smith. Fuller, James ...... James Fuller, son. Fellows, Isaac ...... Jonathan Fellows, son. Fellows, Joseph ..... Joseph Fellows, son. George, James j Francis George ( James George (2). Greenleaf, Stephen, Capt. . . Capt. John Greenleaf, jr. Gody (Goddin), Amos . . . Stephen Emerson. rt- , -,- ^ -T , f Solomon Giddins, son. Giddms, John ...... < T , , , ,, ( John Fowl (2). rL.-TTi. ( Gershom Fraizer. Gallaway, Hugh ..... | Moses Titcomb (2) . Herin, John ....... Jon a . Fellows. Harvey, John ...... John Harvey, son. Hobson, John ...... John Hobson, son. Hutchinson, Sam 1 ...... Sam 1 . Mugrige. Hadley, Sam 1 . ...... . ( Joseph Bailey (2). mn c^^i f John Corser. Hill, oanr ........ ^AVU \j /\ ( Abraham Adams (2). Ingals, Sam 1 ....... Samuel Ingals, grandson. fW m . Foster. Jackson, John ...... -j John Foster (2) . (Asa Foster (2). Jackson, Caleb ...... Joshua Jackson, son. Jacobs, Richard ...... Philip Fowler. Jewett, Joseph ...... Mr. Jon a . Jewett, son. NARRAGANSET NO. 1. 415 Soldier Grantees. Claimants. Kimbal, Henry James Godfrey. Kimbal, Caleb Samuel Hovey. Kinsmon, Robert Joseph Kinsmon, son. j Joseph Coffin. Keene, Nath 1 . ...... ( Francis Pickard. I Mr. Aquila Jewett. ,^ T , , < Francis Pickard. Kneeland, Sam 1 (John Pemberton (2). -ir n. rm ( Moses Mitchel. Knowlton, W j Israel Read (2). Kingsbury, Thomas .... Deacon Joseph Kingsbury. ,^ . , rv, : . , ( Ebenezer Smith. Kenmstone, Christopher . . . j Ezekie l Mig hill (2). Laighton, John John Laighton, son. Low, Thomas Jon a . Low. Little, Moses Col. Joseph Gerish. Lad, Daniel Nathan Simons. Lovel, John Alexander Lovel. f Joseph Gerish, Esq. Musgro,Jabez | Daniel Hale (2) . Moors, Jon% Lieut Sam 1 . Walker. Mitchell, John j Mary Mitchell, dau. ( Ambros Berrey (2). f John Martin, son. Martin, John J. Joseph Bailey (2) . ( Timothy Davis (2) . TVT f John Brown. Newman, Benjamin .... { Mr . Daniel Ha le (2) . Newmarch, Zaccheus .... John, son. f Stephen Emery 3d . Poore, Sam 1 -< Richard Dole. ( Joseph Peasley (2). Parson, Benjamin Bartholomew Pearson. Plummer, Joseph John Plummer, gr. grandson. Poore, Henry Samuel Poore, son. Pickard, John Jon a . Pickard, grandson. Palmer, Thomas Timothy Palmer, son. Parse (Peirce), Sam 1 \ fP hrai A m *. | Isaac Appleton (2). Potter, Edmund Nath 1 . Potter. Ring, Daniel, Capt Capt. Tho s . Standford. Richardson, Caleb Thomas Gellins (Jillings). Rogers Thomas I Thomas Bartlet, Jr. * * | Thomas Rogers (2). ( Benj a . Rollins. Rollins, Nicholas ..... -j Ebenezer Watson. (John Brooks (2). Richardson, Nicholas .... Isaac Appleton. 416 KING PHILIP S WAR. Soldier Grantees. Claimants. f Mr. Joseph Parker. Ruff, Daniel j Capt. John Fowl (2). ( John Hobson. Rose, Joseph { Capt. Samuel Walker (2). Rolf, Daniel Israel Read. ( Nath 1 . Clark. Sumersby, Daniel { Mr. Nathaniel Dummer (2). Sheapard, Solomon .... Solomon Sheapard, son. ( Richard Stimson, sou. Stimson, George { George Stimson. f Sam 1 . Herimon. Spofford,John { Rich- 1 . Thurston. Sawyer, William Mr. Francis Sawyer, son. f Joseph Pike. Smith, Thomas { Daniel Woodman (2). Sadler, Abiel John Sadler. ( Rich d . Swan, son. Swan, Robert { Obadiah Johnson (2) . ( Seth Storer, son. Storer, Seth { Zechariah Storer (2) . Swan, Rich d Crisp Bradbury. ( John Brown. Sparks, Thomas -] John Gains. ( Joseph Woodman (2) . f Sam 1 . Stickney, son. Stickney, John j Moses Prime (2) . f Timothy Sheapard, grandson. Sheapard, John j Benjamin Moody (2). Tenny, Daniel Daniel Tenney, son. ( Capt. Thos. Walinford. Tarbot, Nicholas { Rev. James Pike. ( Sam 1 . Tenney. Tenney, Thomas { Thomas Gage (2). ( Daniel Thurston, son. Thurston, Daniel { John Thurston, grandson (2). f John Gains. Taylor, Sam 1 . i Nathaniel Cross (2). Verey, Sam 1 Benjamin Pearson (2) . Verey, Benjamin Deacon Sam 1 . Moody. Verey, Jonathan Benjamin Pearson. Williams, John Nathan Simonds. Woodin, John John Hobson. Woodward, Ezekiel .... John Fowle. Wait, Thomas Thos. Bartlet, jr. ( Beniamin Woodman. Young, Francis | Joseph Woodman (2). NARRAGANSET NO. 2. 417 NARRAGANSET NO. 2, NOW WESTMINSTER, MASS. At a meeting of the several committees of the seven com panies, held, October 17, 1733, at the house of Mr. Luke Verdey, in Boston, before the drawing of lots, for choice of townships, it was voted that whatever company should happen to draw the Township No. 2, at Wachuset, should lay out and assign to his Excellency, Jonathan Belcher, Esqr., five hundred acres of land in said town for his honored father s right. No. 2 was evidently considered the most desirable of the town ships, as it was nearest to Boston and had already been somewhat improved, being one of the two assigned in 1728. Hence the concession above. The township was drawn by Mr. James Lowden and Company, representing the grantees from the towns of Cambridge, Charlestown, Watertown, Weston, Sudbury, New ton, Medford, Maiden and Reading. The committee for this company was John Cutting, of Water- town, James Lowden, of Charlestown, and Joseph Bowman, of Watertown. In the original records of this company the names are arranged in the lists under different towns. I have varied the original arrangement a little, in order to save repeti tions, and so as to put the " Soldier Grantee s " name first. For instance, instead of " Downing Champney for his father Sam 11 ," I have placed the grantee first, the claimant second, and the relationship last. The following is the list: A LIST OF THE GRANTEES OF THE NARRAGANSET TOWN SHIP NO. 2. CAMBRIDGE. Soldier Grantees. Claimants. William Russell, alive. Gershom Cutter, alive. Joseph Beames Joseph Beames, son. Capt. (Jona) Remington . . . Jonathan, son. Saml. Champney Downing Champney, son. Thomas Bathrick Jonathan, son. John Barrel Peter Hay, Bro.-in-law. William Gleason William, son. John Smith Heirs. Saml. Smith Saml. Smith, nephew. Joseph Smith Heirs. Nathaniel Smith Heirs. Thomas Brown Heirs. Simon Gates Jonathan, son. John Willington Thomas, nephew. Thomas Brattle Wm. Brattle, gr. son. James Cheaver Daniel Cheaver, nephew. 418 KING PHILIP S WAB. CHARLESTOWN. Soldier Grantees. Claimants. James Lowden, alive. Samuel Read, alive. Henry Burners alive. John Fosket Robert, son. Isaac Lewis Thomas Skinner, nephew. Samuel Fosket Samuel, son. Saml. Newell Saml. Long, nephew. Joseph Dowse Margery, daughter. Benjamin Lathrop Nathl. Goodwin, nephew. James Smith s heir Jonathan Call. Joseph Pratt Heirs. Samuel Lemmon Heirs. William Burt Heirs. Jacob Cole Heirs. John Mousley (Mousall) . . . Heirs. Humphrey Miller Heirs. John Hawkins Heirs. John Trumbul Heirs. Alexander Philips Heirs. George Mudge . . . . . . Heirs. John Shepherd Heirs. Thomas Welch Heirs. George Grind Heirs. Joseph Lind Heirs. Timothy Cuttler Heirs. (Jonathan) Kittle James, son. Thomas Genner (Jeiiner) . . Heirs. Matthew Griffin John, heir. John Breed Ebenezer, son. Hopestill Davis Zechariah, nephew. Jonathan Sprague John, son. Edward Johnson Elezer, son. John Senter John, son. WATERTOWN. Thomas Sawen John, son. Ephraim Cutler, alive. James Cutting Jonas, son. John Barnard, alive. Joshua Biglow, alive. William Shattuck, alive. Joseph Grout Joseph, son. Jonathan Smith Zechariah, son. John Hager Samuel, nephew. George Herrington Heirs. John Herrington, alive. Dr. (Palgrave) Wellington . . Heirs. Zachariah Cutting, alive. John Bright John, nephew. NARBAGANSET NO. 2. 419 Soldier Grantees. Claimants. William Parmeter George, son. Jacob Bullard Joseph Ball, nephew. Timothy Rice Tho. Herrington, son-in-law. John Sherman John, nephew. James Barnard Joseph Bowman, niece s husband. Joseph Smith Joseph, son. Elnathan Beirs Richard, son. Michael Flag Heirs. John Barnard Joseph Bowman, son-in-law. John Cutting John, son. Joseph Preist Joseph, son. Benjamin Wellington .... Heirs. WESTON. Caleb Grant Ebenezer Boynton, son-in-law. Thomas Cory Thomas, son. Daniel Warren, alive. James Pike Onesiphorus, son. Jeremiah Norcross Nathaniel Norcross. SUDBURY. Matthew Gibbs, alive. Thomas Taylor Richard, son. Sebred Taylor Thomas, son. John Mars ton, alive. John Parkhurst John, son. Dennis Hedley, alive. John Adams, alive. Joseph Parmeter Benjamin, brother. Thomas Rutter Joseph, son. Joseph Graves Ebenezer, son. Joseph More John, son. , > NEWTON. Seborn Jackson Edward, son. Nathaniel Haly, alive. Richard Beach Isaac, brother. Stephen Cook, alive. John Park John, son. Jacob Willard Jonathan, son. Capt. Thomas Prentice, Heirs. MEDFORD. Capt. (Joseph) Scill .... John Hall, son-in-law. John Whitmore John, son. Thomas Willis William, son. 420 KING PHILIP S WAR. MALDEN. Soldier Grantees. Claimants. John Mudge, alive. Phineas Upham Sam l Kneeland, " asine." Abraham Skinner Abraham, son. James Cheak Heirs. John Winslow John, son. John Bacheler Wm. Willis, " for the heirs." REDING. Jonathan Parker Nathl., nephew. Edmon Brown Richard, nephew. Thomas Nichols, alive. Major (Jeremiah) Swain . . . Heirs. Isaac Welman Heirs. Benjamin Davis Heirs. Samuel Lamson Samuel, son. Thomas Hodgman Heirs. Phinehas Upham Richard, son. William Jones Samuel Chandler. The original list from which I copied the above is signed by " Andrew Darby, Proprietor s Clark." The Company held their first meeting in Cambridge, December 20, 1633, and increased the committee to five persons by the addition of Ebenezer Breed and Samuel Trumbull, to those already named. There are, in the above list, 118 names. Phineas Upham appears twice. I think John Barnard, then alive, was the son of John, for whom Capt. Bowman drew in the right of his wife. Much more matter of interest may be found in the excellent " History of Westminster," by Rev. Wm. S. Heywood. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 3, AMHERST, N.H. The second of the two townships granted in 1728 became No. 3, " Souhegan West," in the later division ; and was drawn to the grantees represented in the towns of Salem, Lynn, Marble- head, Gloucester, Andover, Topsfield, Beverly, Wenham, Box- ford, Bradford, Scarborough, York, Falmouth, Chatham. The committee chosen to manage the propriety were : Richard Mower, of Lynn ; John Trask, Salem ; and Ebenezer Rayment. This township was incorporated as Amherst, N.H., and origi nally embraced parts of the present towns of Merrimack, Mt. Vernon, and Milford, N.H. An excellent history of this town, by D. F. Secomb, was published in 1883. NARRAGANSET NO. 3. 421 LIST OF GRANTEES, HEIRS, AND LATER PROPRIETORS OF NARRAGANSET NO. 3, SOUHEGAN WEST; NOW AMHERST, N.H. Soldier Grantee. Edward Harradaway, John Elwell . . . Thomas Babson . . Joseph Soams Thomas Putnam,. Joseph Hutchinson . Andrew Gold . . SALEM. Claimant. Heirs. John, son . John, brother . Nathaniel, nephew. Thomas, son. Robert, son. Ezekiel Marsh, son- in-law. By whom drawn. John Stevens. Joseph Williams. Thomas Fuller . . John Ross .... Samuel Verry . Joseph Holton William, son. Jonathan Marsh, son- in-law .... Jonathan, son By Jonathan Marsh s order. John Felton. Ebenezer Fowl. Thomas Flynt . . Samuel Pickworth John, son .... George Deland. Benjamin Ives. William Curtice . William Trask . . Thomas Bell . . William, son . John, son .... William Curtice. John Trask. Samuel Bell. Jonathan Lambert Ephraim In^alls. William Osborn . John Bullock . Jeremiah Neal John Gloyd . Capt. (Joseph) Gard ner William, son . . . John, son. Jeremiah, son . John, son .... Habakkuk, nephew . William Osborn. Jeremiah Neal. John Trask. Belongs to Joshua Hicks. John Abbott . Alive Ephraim Ingalls. Thomas Kenney . Heirs Daniel Kenney Edward Hollice Heirs Benjamin Ives Richard Prince John Tarble . . . Joseph, nephew . Richard Prince. Cornelius Tarbel. Joseph Herrick . . Joseph, son. William Hinds . . David Shaply . John Walcot . Joseph Majory . . Dr. (Richard) Knott, Stephen Sweat John Gatchell MARBLEHEAD. Alive. Richard, son . Jonathan, son Joseph, son Thomas Martin. Joseph, brother . Jeremiah, nephew Sold to Obid Abot. Jacob Symonds Jabez Crocker. Joseph Majory. Joseph Sweat. Jeremiah Gatchell. for 422 KING PHILIP S WAR. Soldier Grantee. Henry Collins . . John Newhall . Thomas Baker William Bassett . Samuel Johnson . Joseph Collins John Burrill . . Robert Potter . . John Lindsey . Aquilla Ramsdell Robert Driver Ephraim Farrow . John Ballard . . John Mower . Samuel Graves Samuel Edmonds . John Farrington . John Davis LYNN. Claimant. Alive Alive Rand Joseph Farr . John Lewis . . Samuel Tarbox . Johnson . Joseph Barrell Timothy Breed Andrew Townsend Richard Haven Alive William Bassett, gr. son. Richard Johnson, son, William, son . Ebenezer, brother . Benjamin, son Joseph Farr, son-in- law Benjamin, son . . Ruth Driver, daugh ter Samuel Newhall, nephew .... John, son .... Richard, son . Samuel, son . John, son. Michael Bo wden, son- in-law .... Robert Rand, son. Joseph Farr, son Edmund, gr. son Heirs Jonathan Johnson . Ebenezer Barrell, gr. son . . Timothy, son Heirs Joseph, son. By -whom drawn. By Henry Collins order. By Jacob Newhall, now Henr. Adams. By Thomas Baker. Richard Johnson. William (Dec. 11, 1739). Ebenezer Burrill, Esq. Benjamin Potter. By said Farr s order. Due to proprietors 2- 10-0, besides the vote for 6s., towards the Meeting house. Capt. Potter. Benjamin Newhall. John Ballard. Richard Mower. Samuel Graves. John Jenks. Michael Bowden. By his order. By Edmund Lewis. Thomas Tarbox. By Jonathan Johnson. By same (E. Marsh- field) . Same, Timothy Breed. Nathaniel Evins. Henry Row Samuel Ingersoll . Edward Harringdon John Day . . . Isaac Ellery . Samuel Tyler . James Fry . . . Nathaniel Ballard GLOUCESTER. Jacob Row, son Alive Josiah Ingersoll. Alive Joseph Harringdon. Alive Joshua Hicks. Samuel Stevens. ANDOVER. Ebenezer, son Alive . . William, son . James Parker. Joseph Parker. Same, William Ballard. NARRAGANSET NO. 3. 423 Soldier Grantee. Claimant. By whom drawn. John Presson . . . Alive. John Ballard . . . John, son .... Sherebiah Ballard. Ebenezer Barker . . Alive Edward Phelps. Andrew Peters . . Andrew, son . . . Andrew Peters. John Parker . . . Alive John Parker. Samuel Phelps . . Alive John Phelps. TOPSFIELD. Zaccheus Perkins . . Alive By T. Perkins. Nathaniel Wood . . Alive John Wilds. Abraham Fitts . . Heirs Abraham Fitts. Thomas Davis . . Heirs (Bought at vendue, by Capt. Stephen Peabody.) Elihu Wardwell . . Heirs. John Huchins . . . Heirs Nathan Armes. Josiah Clark . . . Heirs John Wilds. James Ford . . . Heirs Deacon Fellows. Samuel Perkins . . Heirs Elezer Porter. Joseph Wells . . . Heirs. Jonathan Wild . . Heirs John Wild. Robert Brown . . . Samuel Kneeland. BEVERLY. Thomas Rayment . Alive. Ralph Elinwood . . (Alive) (By himself.) Henry Bayley . . . Alive. Christopher Reid . . Alive. Lott Conant . . . Alive Joshua Conant. Thomas Blachfield . Thomas, son . . . Robert Hale. John Elinwood . . Andrew Dodge . . Now Thomas Clark s, July 17, 1739. Joseph Morgan . . Joseph, son . . . Daniel Herrick. William Dodge . . Heirs. John Dodge . . . Heirs Jona. and John Dodge. Jonathan Byels . . Alive. William Rayment . Heirs Ebenezer Rayment. Elias Picket . . . Joseph, son. Samuel Harris . . Heirs Ebenezer Elingwood. Thomas Abbet Richard Hutton Joseph Bachelor Joseph Perkins WENHAM. Thomas, son. Elizabeth Fowler, daughter . . . By Capt. Kembal. John Bacheler, nephew. William Rogers and Jo seph Perkins. 424 KING PHILIP S WAR. Soldier Grantee. William Peabody Francis Jefferys . Robert Andrews . Joseph Bixbe . . BOXFORD. Claimant. Stephen, son. James Curtice. John, son . John, son . By whom drawn. Stephen Peabody. Thomas Andrews. By same, John Bixbe. John Boynton BRADFORD. Ichabod, son . By John Bixbe. Sold Hobbs for 60. at vendue, October 18 : 1743. SCARBOROUGH. . Alive Thomas Stocker, junr. READING. John Bowtel . . . John, son . . . Nicholas Lum (Lunn) , Thomas Bancroft. Samuel Lampson. Andrew Sargent YORK. Dennison, son Capt. Joshua Hicks. Joseph Hatch . Philip Dexter . FALMOUTH. Alive. Alive. CHATHAM. Robert Nicholson . Robert, son. Nicholas Manning Timothy Lufkin . SALEM. Samuel Manning, nephew . Thomas, son . By said S. M. Samuel Manning. A Committee for Adjusting Claims, gives the Rights drawn to and entered in the name of Robert Hucherson to Joseph Hucherson. John Dodges Heirs belongs to Jonathan Dodge. Thomas Blachfield s " " Henry Blachfield. Jonathan Wilds " " John Wild. 1 It may be of interest to note here that it was in u search after this John Harmon, a maternal ancestor, that the writer of this volume discovered the Treasury Books of John Hall, the con tents of which became the basis of the " Soldiers in King Philip s War." NARRAGANSET NO. 4. 425 NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 4, NOW GREENWICH, MASS. The last " plat," or plan of the townships to be laid out and presented to the Court for confirmation, was No. 4. This was located at Amoskeag Falls, and embraced what is now Goffstown, N.H. With allowances for poor land, ponds, and fifty acres for a fishing-place, at the Falls, it contained 26,160 acres. Mr. Edward Shove, Mr. Josiah Keith, and Col. John Chandler were chosen a committee to manage the affairs of this township. December 16, 1735, a petition of John Foster and Edward Shove, in behalf of the grantees of No. 4, declares that, upon viewing the grant in order to lay out their lots, " they found it so poor and barren, as to be altogether uncapable of making settle ments ; and therefore pray that they may have liberty to quit it and take up the Said Grant in some other province land." This petition was granted, and the petitioners were ordered to locate another tract in some unoccupied section, and return a plot of the same to the Court within twelve months. The report of location and survey was made December 5, 1737, Nathaniel Kellogg being the surveyor, who reported the plot to contain 23,040 acres, exclusive of 600 acres previously laid out to one Colman. This grant, thus located and surveyed, was con firmed by the Court January 13, 1738. Next year the committee return again, petitioning for 3,500 acres more (to make up for ponds, and a tract belonging to Mr. Starr), which land lies on their North line, between Hatfield and a place called Huntstown. June 17, 1740, this propriety was granted an extension of two years to their time of settlement. Again, June 12, 1753, Samuel Robinson, of Hardwick, for " himself and the rest of the proprie tors of Narraganset No. 4, Lying part at a place called Quabbin, and part west of and adjoining Hatfield," etc., petitioned the Court to reestablish and confirm the grant of the 3,500 acres, made in 1740, as the Acts of the Court, including this grant, were destroyed when the Court-house was burned, (December 9, 1747). The old Proprietors Record-Book in the town clerk s office at Greenwich is in a fair state of preservation, but the writing, in this list of grantees, is very hard to decipher. I spent some hours over it with the assistance of the gentlemanly town clerk, Mr. H. B. Hodgkin, and I think the following is as accurate as it can now be made. The names and places noted with a star (*) are in doubt. 426 KING PHILIP S WAR. NARRAOANSET NO. 4, NOW GREENWICH, MASS. NORTHAMPTON. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Daniel Alexander John, brother. Samuel Judd Samuel, brother. HADLEY. Thomas Hovey, alive. SUFFIELD. John Pengally, alive. Samuel Lain Samuel, son. ENFIELD. William Ramsdell, alive. DEERFIELD. Elch d . Childs Sam 1 , and Timothy, sons. WORCESTER. Bartholomew Flagg .... Benjamin, brother. WOODSTOCK. James Hudson Sarah Mercy, daughter. Nathaniel Sanger, alive. Joseph Lyon Joseph, son. Capt. Isaac Johnson .... Joseph, grandson. Joseph Carpenter . . . . . Eliphalet, son. Henry Boweu Henry, grandson. OXFORD. Joseph Chamberlain .... Joseph, son. Abiell Lamb Abiell, son. BROOKFIELD. Edward Walker, alive. MANSFIELD. John Dunham Isaac, son. Benjamin Hall, alive. Shuball Dimmock, alive. NORWICH. Thomas Hazen, alive. Daniel Wicomb Daniel, son. Israeli Hendrick Israeli, son. David Hartshorn, alive. John Hartshorn, alive. NARRAGANSET NO. 4. 427 POMFRET. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Samuel Taylor, alive. Jeremiah Sabin Jeremiah, nephew. Fenwick Sawyer Fenwick, son. John Corbin Nath 1 . Sessions, son-in-law. WINDHAM. Jeremiah Ripley Joshua, son. Ephraim Beamass, alive. BRISTOL. John Bozorth John, son. TAUNTON. John Spurr, alive. John Thresher, alive. Malachi Holloway, alive. William Hopkins, alive. John Maccomber Thomas, son. Ebenezer Owen John Woodward, son-in-law. 1 Joseph White Joseph, son. Samuel Mirick Samuel, son. Jacob Hathaway Heirs. James Bell Heirs. SWANZY. John Wheeton, alive. Thomas Buffington, alive. John Brown John, son. REHOBOTH. Jonathan Willmarth, alive. Sampson Mason, alive. Joseph Baker John, son. John Hull Edward, son. John Ridaway James, son. Josiah Perry Josiah, son. John Ide Timothy, brother. Thomas Kindrick Heirs. Joseph Daggett John, son. John Martin John, son. LITTLE COMPTON. Benjamin Church Thomas, son. 1 Ebenezer Owen had a son who has left a son called Thomas Owen who claims, and to whom the right belongs. 428 KING PHILIP S WAR. DIGHTON. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Theophilus Mitchell .... Edw d . Shove, son-in-law. Abraham Hathaway .... Abraham, son. Benjamin Crane Heirs. ATTLEBOROUGH. Jonathan Freeman Jonathan, son. John Fitch Joseph Brown, heir. NORTON. Sam 1 . Skillings Mehitable Tucker, daughter. William Wetherell John, son. Thomas Barnam John, son. FREETOWN. Joshua Tisdale Samuel, son. Moses Cleveland John, son. HARRINGTON. Benjamin Allen Joseph, son. Richard Allen Joseph, nephew. John Reed John, son. BRIDGEWATER. 1 Richard Burnham Abigail Hubbard, daughter. Samuel Pecher Samuel, son. Daniell Hudson, alive. Richard Jennings, alive. Isaac Leonard Isaac, son. Joseph Richards Benjamin Richards. John Howard Edward, son. James Gary . . .... James, son. Elisha Hayward Thomas 3 d , nephew. Jonathan Washburn .... Benjamin, son. Joseph Bailey Eben r . Hill, nephew. Solomon Cheever (Checker) . . Josiah Edson. Ebenezer Hill Ebenezer, son. John Handmore John, son. KILLINGLY. David Church, alive. Isaac Morriss Samuel, brother. LEABANON. Benjamin Woodworth. 1 Bridgewater names confirmed by the partial list of Grantees in Mass. Archives, vol. 114, pp. 103-11C. NARRAGANSET NO. 4. 429 MIDDLEBOROUGH. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Daniell Ramsdell Thomas, son. Isaac Peirce, alive. *Ellexander Reynolds (Rynge) , ( ?) alive. MIDDLETON. Ebenezer Prout, alive. PLIMPTON. John Barret, alive. John Briant, alive. George Sampson, alive. Caleb Cook Heirs. KINGSTON. William Bradford John, son. ROCHESTER. Nehemiah Bessey Robert, son. Moses Barlow, alive. Isaac Holmes Ebenezer, son. PEMBROOK. Elisha Busbee (Besbedge) . . Elisha, son. Nathaniel Nicolls, alive. Hopestill Busby (Besbedge) . . Elisha, nephew. MARSHFIELD. * Walter Noice (Voice), alive. Jonathan Crocker, alive. Joseph Ross, alive. Josiah Winslow Isaac, son. James Snow * ? Winslow. ASHFIELD. Andrew Watkins Andrew, son. William Preist William, son. COLCHESTER. Benjamin Chamberlain, alive. HADDAM. James Ray, alive. Thomas Lewis, alive. HEBRON. Richard Man, alive. 430 KING PHILIP S WAR. WRENTHAM. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Thomas Man Thomas, son. John Day John, son. BELLINGHAM. Thomas Brick Thomas, son. HORSENECK. Thomas Bullen Thomas, son. WALPOLE. Samuel Foster John, son. William Robins William, son. NORTH KINGSTON. James Updike, alive. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 5, SOUHEGAN EAST, NOW BEDFORD, PART OF MERRIMAC, AND PART OF MAN CHESTER, N.H. This township was drawn to the grantees, or their claimants, then (1733), residing in the several towns of Boston, Roxbury, Dorchester, Milton, Braintree, Weymouth, Hingham, Dedham, Stoughton, Brookline, Needham, Hull, Medfield, Scituate, New port, New London and Providence. The grantees met, and chose for their committee, Col. Thomas Tileston, Mr. Jonathan Williams and Capt. Joseph Ruggles. A different mode of management and settlement was proposed by this company, and allowed by the General Court. They proposed to settle sixty families, and the other sixty grantees, or those who became proprietors, to pay five pounds on their rights, into the general propriety. Those who drew odd-numbered lots were to pay five pounds, and those who drew even numbers were to settle families. All were to bear a proportional part in meeting the conditions of the settle ment of the township. From a report made to the General Court, March 25th, 1751 (Mass. Archives, vol. 115, p. 844), it is seen that the rights throughout the township were then all drawn and surveyed, and the names of the proprietors of the settled and unsettled lots given. Sixty families were then settled in town, but no minister, and no meeting-house built. One hun dred and twenty acres had been voted to Deacon Jonathan Williams for his services as proprietor s treasurer, and one hun dred and twenty more to Capt. Joseph Blanchard if he erect a NARBAGANSET NO. 5. 431 good saw-mill and corn-mill. There had been "much discour agement from the late Indian wars ;" and seventeen gentlemen of New Hampshire, calling themselves " Lord Proprietors " of the said Province, claim to own the land, but have granted them their rights as laid out, on condition that seventeen rights be reserved for themselves. LIST OF GRANTEES AND CLAIMANTS OF NARRAGANSET NO. 5, NOW BEDFORD, ETC. BOSTON. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Andrew Belcher, Esq His Excellency Jona. Belcher, son. Dr. John Clark Heirs, by William Clark. Richard Way Heirs. William Dinsdell William, son. (Thomas?) Warren . ... Sarah Warren, wife. Henry Swain Benjamin, son. Isaac Prince Heirs. Dr. John Cutler Heirs. Benjamin Williams Heirs. Nicholas Allin Daniel, son. Henry Timberlake Heirs. Jeremiah Fay Heirs. Thomas Weymouth Heirs. John Arnold Heirs. Samuel Polard Sam 1 . Kneeland, gr. son. Samuel Bicknerd Benjamin, son. Jacob Grig Heirs. Joseph Gridley John, son. John Nelson, alive. Perez Savage Heirs. James Lendal Heirs. Thomas Plimbly Heirs. John Mors John Gridley, gr. son. (John?) Ruggles John Ruggles, son. John Triscot Samuel Kneeland. Daniel Matthews Rebecca Hannan, daughter. Benjamin Dyer Benjamin, son. Edward Ting Edward, son. John Leach John, son. Henry Chamberlain John, son. David Landon Benjamin, son. Joshua Lain John, son. Edward Wedan Rebecca Foster, daughter. Joshua Hewes Sarah Perkins. Ambros Dawes Thomas, son. Zachariah Gurney, alive. Capt. (Nath 1 .) Davenport . . Addington Davenport, nephew. Thomas Hunt, alive. 1 Probably Thomas, of Boston, M. Sarah Fitch. See Moseley 8 Co. 432 KING PHILIP S WAR. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Capt. (Sam 1 .) Wadsworth . . Joseph, Esq., son. Peter Bennet Owen Harris, son-in-law. Gamaliel Rogers Simon, son. John Tuckerman, alive. Richard Bill Richard, son. William Hacy William, gr. son. John Richards John, son. Capt. (Sam 1 .) Maudesley . . . Jonathan Williams, son-in-law. William Manley, alive. John Means, alive. Caleb Moor Ephraim, son. Capt. James Oliver Daniel, nephew. John Hands Hugh Calder, son-in-law. Pilgrim Simpkins Thomas and John, sons. John Goodwin Nathaniel, son. Thomas Beedle Thomas, son. George Ripley Moses Ayers, son.(?) Thomas Moors John, son. Thomas Barnard Thomas, son. ROXBURY. Joseph Goad John Wilson, son-in-law. Joseph Dudley, Esqr Paul, son. Paul Wilson Henry, son. John Watson Caleb Stedman, nephew. William Lyon Samuel, son. Thomas Hawley Edward Dorr, son-in-law. John Payson John, son. John Scot Joseph, son. Thomas Bishop Zachariah Chandler, son-in-law. Thomas Weld Edmond, son. John Baker, alive. Thomas Morey John, son. Thomas Hencher Zechariah Smith, niece s husband. Samuel Williams, alive. Thomas Baker John, brother. DORCHESTER. Timothy Tileston Thomas, son. Hopestill Humphrey, alive. Thomas Davenport Heirs. Ebenezer Williams, alive. Henry Ledbetter Heirs. Samuel Jones Ebenezer, son. William Davenport Richard, nephew. MILTON. John Miller Samuel, brother. Thomas Vose Heirs. NARRAGANSET NO. 5. 433 BRAINTREE. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. Samuel Bass, alive. Samuel Bingley Sam 1 . Whitt, son-in-law. Thomas Coplin Thomas, son. Thomas Holbrook, alive. Thomas Bingley Heirs. WEYMOUTH. John Hollis Samuel, son. William Sewell Nicholas Phillips, son-in-law. John Burrill, alive. John Whitmarsh Gideon Terrel. HINGHAM. Joseph Thorn, alive. Thomas Thaxter Samuel, brother. John Jacobs John, son. Francis Gurnet Samuel, son. Samuel Gill, alive. John Langley John, son. Samuel Lincoln Samuel, son. Ephraim Lain Ephraim, son. Nathaniel Beal Heirs. Benjamin Bates Heirs. Cornelius Canterbury .... Heirs. (George) Vickrey Israel, son. John Arnold Heirs. DEDHAM. Samuel Gill, alive. Samuel Colburn Ephraim Colburn. Jonathan Gay Jeremiah, son. William Dean Heirs. (" W m . Dean died at Leb anon.") STOUGHTON. Peter Talbot George, son. BROOKLYN. Benjamin White Heirs. Samuel Gardner Joseph, brother. NEEDHAM. John Rice, alive. HULL. Joseph Benson Joseph, son. John Bull Thomas Vickars. 434 KING PHILIP S WAR. MEDFIELD. Soldier Grantee. Claimant. John Plympton John, son. SCTTUATE. Samuel Hatch, alive. Richard Proute John, son. Israel Hobart, alive. William Hawkins Benjamin Turner. Joseph Brigs Heirs. NEWPORT. Jethro Jeffreys Heirs. NEW LONDON. Samuel Knight Mad m . Livingstone, niece. PROVIDENCE. David Evans David, son. John Jacts (Jaques), alive. A true copy, Attest SAM". KNEELAND. Cle : to the grantees. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 6, NOW TEMPLETON, MASS. This township was confirmed by the General Court February 12th, 1733, to one hundred and twenty grantees, or their represent atives, then residing in the towns of Concord, Groton, Marlboro , Chelmsford, Billerica, Lancaster, Lexington, Stow, Framingham, Littleton, Sherborn, Stoneham, Southboro , Woburn. The com mittee chosen to manage the affairs of this township were Mr. Samuel Chandler of Concord, Mr. Jacob Wright of Woburn, and Capt. Benjamin Prescott of Groton. This committee seems to have managed so well as not to have troubled the General Court further, except in 1736, when it was found that their grant fell about one thousand acres short of the amount granted, partly by rectifying the line of Narraganset No. 2. In answer to this the Court granted a tract of four hundred acres on the northerly side, from the Province lands. The list of names for this town ship is the least satisfactory of all. After a search extending, at various times, over many years, I have not been able to find any list of grantees, and after long study and research present this list of original claimants with such additional facts and hints as I can glean from various sources. From the old Proprietors NARRAGANSET NO. 6. 435 Record-Book, in Templeton, I copied the earliest list of those who drew lots on June 24th, 1735. No residence is mentioned in connection with the names, and only in a few instances is any reference made to the grantees. From the partial list in the State Archives I gather the grantees living in Concord and Billerica. Those items which follow the star, (*) are references to this volume. It is to be plainly understood that these are only hints, and by no means identifications of grantees. Many of the company of Captain Davenport were from the towns represented in this grant. These references may help the student in over coming some of the defects of this list. LIST OF PROPRIETORS OF NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 6. June 24 1735. Those that drawed their lots in the Narraganset Township No. 6. No. of Lot. Claimant. 49. Samuel Chandler 52. Samuel Chandler 19. Benjamin Temple 88. Zechariah Symmes. 9 and 96. Simon Davis. 39. Jonathan Buttrick 8. Ephraim Brown . 104. Elnathan Jones . 14. Samuel Miles. 26. Johu Wood. 17. Jonathan Whitcom. 80. Joseph Buckley . 18. George Farrar (Farrow 38. Deacon Sam 1 . Stone 118. Daniel Adams . , 82. David Whitney. 111. Daniel Billing . 94. E. - Joseph Wheat . . 117. Abraham Taylor. 7. Samuel Hartwell 120. David Wheeler . , 79. Thomas Ball. 84. Moses Whitney . 69. Ebenezer Wheeler . 62. Henry Baldwin . . 94. W. Eleazer Flagg . . 77. Nathaniel Kendall . 35. Zechariah Flagg . , 96. W. Samuel Wilson . . 30. John Wyman . . Grantees and references. For his father Joseph Buss [sic] . Assine to John Taley. In the right of his father Abraham. For heirs of Samuel Buttrick. For his father Thomas Brown. Assine to Jonathan Looker. 95. W. Eben Parker . For his father Peter Buckley. ) Heir to Samuel How. *Capt. Prentice s Co. For his father-in-law, Daniel Dean. For his father Nathaniel. For Moses Wheat. For his father Samuel. Assine to Samuel Greeland. *Capt. Davenport s Co. For his father John. *Capt. Davenport s Co. (John). For his father Eleazer. *Capt. Oliver s Co. (John) . *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Michael). *Capt. Johnson s Co. (Nath 1 .). *Capt. Prentice s Co. (son of John, killed at Narraganset). *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Thomas and John). 436 KING PHILIP S WAR. No. of Lot. Claimant. 103. 112. 85. Jacob Wright Grantees and references. John Guttler .... *Capt. Davenport s Co. Sam 1 .Hincher(Henshaw)*Lieut. Oakes Co. (Thomas). 23. Nathan Brooks . 28. Joshua Richardson 100. David Roberts . 113. Ed ward Win. . 89. Jonathan Wyman 42. 116. 121. 123. 68. 74. 15. 29. 3. 25. 32. 63. 86. 54. 34. 95. E. 33. 37 67. 101 70. 114. 53. 10. 73. 98. 75. 87. 122. 109. 108. 11. 41. 110. 6. 50. 66. 44. 48. 13. 4. Eleazer Bateman James Simonds . . Benjamin Wyman . . Elisha Tattingham . . Jonas Houghton. Benjamin Shedd . Simon Stone. William Shattuck . Jonathan Farnsworth . John Wheeler . Joseph Wood. Thomas Tarble. Samuel Hunt, .alive. Jonathan Lawrence Zechariah Lawrence. John Muzzey. Col. Benjamin Prescott Daniel Woodward . Gershom Flagg . . . Joseph Fasset William Wheeler. Dr. John Longley. Benjamin Whitney. Thomas Amsden Thomas Amsden . . Daniel White . . Thomas Hapgood . . Daniel Gates .... Henry Bartlett . . Nathaniel Trask John Earns Henry Earns. James Pattison . . . Moses Burdue. Thomas Baldwin . . "For Earns," *Capt. Prentice s Co. (John Earns) . " For Snow," *Capt. Davenport, (Zach. Snow). *Capt. Prentice s Co. (Nath 1 ). *Capt. Davenport s Co. (William). *Capt. Brattle s Co. (Increase Winne) . *Capt. Prentice s Co. (Lieut. John) son. *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Peter). *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Caleb). *Capt. Prentice s Co. (Francis) son? *Major Appletou s Co. (Elias) . For his father John, alive. *Capt. Prentice s Co. *Maj. Willard s Co. (Matthias of Groton) . For his brother Joseph. *Capt. Davenport s Co. *Capt. Mosely s Co. (John Pres cott) . *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Daniel) . Probably of Woburn. Probably son of Patrick of Biller- ica. For Isaac. For Jacob. *Capt. Davenport s Co. (John), For Waight. For Wheeler. *Capt. Johnson s Co. (Henry) . *Capt. Gardiner s Co. (John). *Capt. Prentice s Co. (John) . For his father James. *Capt. Davenport s Co. (John). NARRAGANSET NO. 437 No. of Lot. Claimant. 106. John Needham . 47. Jonathan Simonds . 119. John Pro vinder . 24. Samuel Sheldon . . 91. Josiah Hobbs 99. Capt. James Jones 60. Capt. Jonathan Bowers. 43. John Adams . 12. Capt. Benjamin Thom son 58. Benjamin Gery . 115. EbenezerFisk . 55. John Whitcomb, Esq. 51. Thankful Reed . . . 90. Caleb Sawyer . . . 1. Hezekiah Hapgood. 78. Robert Cummings. 40. Samuel Warren . 2. Benjamin Atherton. 20. John Priest . . . . 97. Edward Phelps . . . 45. Jacob Houghton. 61. Benjamin Smith . 96. Joseph Wheelock. 65. John Tyler . . . . 56. Timothy Spalding. 2 1 . Ephraim Temple . 16. Timothy Townsend 57. John Swan .... 27. Joseph Hosly. 31. Edward Wilson . . . 5. 93. John Overing, p]sq. 22. Robert Robbins . . . 105. Isaac Larned 59. John Cummings. 102. John Barrett .... 46. First Ministry, 92, Min istry, 36 School Lot. Grantees and references. For his father John. *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Caleb). Drawn by Benj a . Muzzey, *Capt. Mosely s Co. For his father John. *Capt. Syll s Co. *Major Appleton s Co. (Morgan Jones) . *Capt. Prentice s Co. (John) . For his father Joseph. *Capt. Prentice s Co. (Thomas). For James Houghton. By Nehemiah Abbot. Probably for brother Ephraim. *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Daniel). *Capt. Davenport s Co. (John). *Capt. Gardiner s Co. (Samuel). *Capt. Davenport s Co. (James, Joseph, Jon a .). For Jacob Wright, *Capt. Pren tice s Co. (Joseph) . For Paddleford, *Capt. Syll s Co. (Zechariah) . *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Samuel). *Capt. Bocklebank s Co. (John). For John Bush & John Wood. *Major Appleton s Co. (John). *Capt. Davenport s Co. (Isaac). *Capt. Prentice s Co. Additional names from the partial list in the Mass. Archives, vol. 114, pp. 103-110. A part of the names of Concord men I have incorporated in the references above. The towns of Biller- ica and Concord only, of the " No. 6 Towns," appear in this fragmentary list. I add the names not already given above. 438 KING PHILIP S WAK. CONCORD. Claimant. Grantee. Samuel Chandler Assign to John G-riggs. Samuel Chandler, Jr Assign to John Kene. Jonathan Whitney, alive. Jane Cane For her father John Cane. William Clark Heir to John Taylor. James Russel For his grandfather Benjamin. BILLERICA. John Stern Heirs * Capt. Prentice s Co. p. 82. Nathaniel Rogers, alive. Samuel Hunt, alive. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP NO. 7, NOW GORHAM, ME. This township was assigned by lot, at the memorable meeting at Luke Verdey s, October 17, 1733, to grantees resident in the towns of Barnstable, Yarmouth, Eastham, Sandwich, Plymouth, Tisbury, Abington, Duxbury, and " one of Scituate." The com mittee chosen to manage the affairs of this township were Col. Shubael Gorham, Mr. Timothy White, and Mr. Robert Standford. The township was located to the eastward of No. 1, and adjoining Falmouth and Presumpscot River. The list below is copied directly from the old Proprietors Record Book. There are two lists, almost identical, with the exception that one contains the residences and number of lots drawn to each name ; the other contains a few additional facts serving to identify some of the claimants. The lists purport to be lists of grantees, but for a long time I have questioned this, and feared it was simply the claimants or proprietors, and find still some perplexing questions. For instance, " Mary Douener " or (Dovenour). How could she be a grantee? But, on the other hand, all the tests from other sources, which I have been able to apply, support the theory that these were the names of the " sol dier grantees." The "partial list," in the Archives, often referred to above, contains the names of the grantees resident in Yarmouth, and simply gives the names of the soldier-grantees, followed by the word " Heirs ; " and in every case these names agree with the list I copy here. I have included here the additional facts from the second list ; for instance, " Thomas Standish, for his uncle, Henry Clark," which may be of help to students of genealogy. The starred items are the additions from the second list. NARRAGANSET NO. 7. A list of the Narragansitt Grantees for the Township, No. 7 ton, June 6, 1733. BARNSTABLE. Mary Douener . Jacob Hinkley . John Cannon George Lewis . . . John Hathway . . . Joseph Higgin . . . Samuel Bryant . . . Richard Ellingham . . Samuel Childs . . . Samuel Barnam . . Sam u Linnell . . . D r Math w . Fuller . . Samuel Fuller . . . Tho 9 . Fuller .... Increase Clap Joseph Taylor . . . John Doncan . . Bartho w . Hamblin . . Eleaz r . Hamblin Tho 8 . Huckins . . . John Phinney Joseph Bearse Sam 11 Hinkley Sam 11 Allyn .... Sam 11 Davis .... John Lewis heirs Caleb Lumbert . Joseph Gorham . Josiah Davis Eben r Goodspeed Eben r Clap .... Lot Conant .... Jedediah Lumbert . Samuel Cops . . Joseph Blish . . John Howland . . John Clarke .... *Shubal Gorham, Jr., ) for his father John } Joseph Crocker John Goodspeed . . YARMOUTH. *Samuel Barker ) for his father Samuel } Richard Tayler . . . "William Gray ) for his father William ) 38 122 22 14 40 86 54 21 118 13 89 69 20 25 16 72 15 88 42 141 87 81 80 70 98 1 19 64 23 85 100 33 47 97 27 111 115 63 114 112 74 120 71 William Chase . Capt. Jn. Gorham Tho 8 . Baxter . . John Thatcher . John Hallitt . . John Matthews . Tho 8 . Thornton . Edward Gray Sam 11 . Hall . . James Maker Ja 8 . Claghorn Joseph Hall . . Lammy Hedge . Nathaniel Hall . Joseph Welden . Samuel Thomas . Jon. Smith Samuel Jones John Taylor . Tho 8 . Felton . . John Gage . . William Follen . William Gage Annanias Wing . John Crowell . John Chase . Henry Gold . . Richard Lake Jabez Gorham . Henry Gage . Yelverton Crowell John Pugsley Daniel Baker . . Jon a . White . . Sam u . Baker . . W m . Baker EASTHAM. *Timothy Cole for his father Timothy *Jeremiah Smith for his father Jeremiah *Jon ft . Grew for his father-in-law, Daniel Cole. * Joseph & Sam 11 . Doan for their father Samuel Berry 439 Bos- 113 96 84 31 93 55 3 4 5 6 7 119 83 8 30 34 17 9 18 10 52 12 49 110 75 108 60 102 109 50 62 106 107 78 79 43 41 91 59 36 440 KING PHILIP S WAR. Tho 8 . Paine .... Jedediah Higgins Eliakim Higgins . . . Joseph Downings Benj. Downings . . . John Freeman Jon a . Sparrow . . . John Knowles Samuel Atkins . John Doan .... Tho 8 . Mulford . . . Daniel Doan .... Jn. Walker .... Jn. Nyrick .... Nath 11 . Williams . . . Josiah Cook .... Joseph Harding . *George Brown 1 for his father George } SANDWICH. *Jon a . Morrey for his wife s brother Foster *Sam 1 . Toby for his uncle Sam 11 . Knott *Nath 1 . Wing ) for his father Nath 1 j Sam 11 . Gibbs Jn. Lewis ) for his brother Benj . j 94 65 11 104 103 34 92 73 67 51 90 29 53 82 58 76 39 44 68 48 45 37 56 Jas. Atkins ... Jehosophat Eldridge PLIMOUTH. W". Ring Peter Tinkham 1 for his father Peter j *Tho 8 . Savery for his father Samuel TISBURY. Jon a . Lumbert .... ABBINGTON. William Harrage DUXBURY. Robert Barker .... * Robert Sandfort ) for his father Robert j Tho 8 . Bonney .... Stephen Sampson . . . *Tho 8 . Hunt for his uncle Thomas Hunt *Tho 8 . Standish for his uncle Henry Clark SCITUATE. *Timothy White 1 for his father Timothy j 61 35 46 28 26 117 66 101 95 32 97 77 105 116 There were many disagreements among the claimants, and some of the evidence furnished here and there in fragments of depositions relating to the evidence, found in the Archives, is of great interest. A memorial of Shubael Goreham to the Gen eral Court, presented April 17, 1741, states that several mistakes have been made in the list of No. 7, and petitions for authority to rectify such mistakes. He says that " Richard Taylor " and " Richard Taylor s heirs " appear ; whereas, the latter item should have been " John Taylor s heirs." And again, two entries appear in the list William Gray is entered " for his father William ; " and then "William Gray s heirs." Now, there were not two William Grays, but there was an Edward Gray. And another entered Joseph Crocker, where it should have been Josiah Crocker, etc., and so it is moved that the mistakes be rectified and that John Taylor, Edward Gray, and Josiah Crocker be placed in the list. But in November, 1742, another turn is given to the Crocker story by the following interesting deposition, which I give in full: VOLUNTOWN, CONNECTICUT. 441 Ebenezer Goodspeed of Barnstable, being in the eighty-seventh year of his age, testifieth and saith that he being a soldier in the Narragan- sett wars so-called, under Capt. Thomas Howes, and he well remembers that Mr. Joseph Crocker, Dec d . of said Barnstable was one of said Howe s soldiers, and I think it was the year of the Philip s war so- called begun, and I also remember said Crocker was out that year Sam 1 Linnell was out in Pearces Fight, so called and he and the said Sam 1 Linnell was the only English man of Barnstable that returned home from that fight, and he showed me his hat where it was shot through after his return from said Pearces Fight, and further I gave Col. Goreham, Joseph Crocker s name to return to the General Court some time ago, and I never heard or understood that Josiah Crocker of Barnstable was ever out in the said wars, and he was my neighbor and I should have known, if he had been out. EBENEZER GOODSPEED. Eben r Goodspeed made oath etc. Nov. 13, 1742. Jonathan Crocker testifieth to the same above as to Joseph Crocker and Sam 1 Linnel, and also as to Josiah Crocker, Dec. 4, 1742. (York Registry of Deeds, v. 23, p. 105.) It will be noted that Joseph Crocker s name stands in the list, as well as Gray s and Taylor s, but in the old partial list, in the Archives, the correction is made, and opposite " William Gray s," is written " Edward," while opposite " Richard Taylour s," is written the name " John." In the above lists I have made the corrections in regard to Taylour and Gray. NARRAGANSET TOWNSHIP GRANTED TO CONNECTICUT VOLUNTEERS IN THE NARRAGANSET WAR, NOW VOLUNTOWN, CONNECTICUT. Connecticut rewarded her Narraganset soldiers many years before the final action of Massachusetts Colony. In October, 1696, Lieut. Thomas Leffingwell of Norwich, and Sergt. John Frink of Stonington, moved the Court of Connecticut, " that they, with the rest of the English volunteers in the former wars, might have a plantation granted unto them." The Court, in answer, then granted them a tract six miles square, to be taken up out of some of the conquered land, where it might be had without prejudice to any former grant. A com mittee of the grantees made choice of a tract. October 14, 1697, Capt. Samuel Mason, Mr. John Gallop and Lieut. James Avery were appointed a committee to view the said tract. Upon the report of the above committee, the Court, in October, 1700, confirmed their former grant to a committee of seven, viz. : Lieut. Thomas Leffingwell, Lieut. Richard Bushnell, Isaac 442 KING PHILIP S WAR. Wheeler, Caleb Fobes, Samuel Bliss, Joseph Morgan and Manasseh Miner, and the rest of the volunteers in the Narraganset War. At a meeting of the volunteers, July 1, 1701, Capt. Richard Bushnell was chosen clerk, to make a list of the names of those who were volunteers in the Narraganset wars. Lieut. Thomas Leffingwell, Lieut. James Avery, Sergt. John Fririk, Richard Bushnell, and Deacon Caleb Fobes, were chosen a committee to receive and decide the correctness of the claims presented. On the next day the volunteers voted to grant to Capt. Samuel Mason an equal share with the others. From the old Proprietors Record Book at Voluntown I have se cured two lists of the grantees or " Volunteers." The first list was made in the order of the enrolment of the names, and was copied for Hon. Richard A. Wheeler, of Stonington, in 1860, by Elisha Potter, then Town Clerk of Voluntown, and published by him some years ago, in the Narragansett Historical Register. The other list is that of the " Cedar Swamp Lots," so called. This list was copied for me by the Town Clerk, Mr. Charles E. Maine, of Voluntown, and I am assured that it is correct. I have compared these lists, and while there are some few discrepancies in the spelling, and some names in each list not in the other, the lists are otherwise identical. For the convenience of readers I have arranged the second list here according to the numbers drawn for Cedar Swamp Lots. Mr. Wheeler s list marks the names of those deceased. The restrictions of the Connecticut grant to " Eng lish " volunteers shut out the Indians, who formed a large con tingent of their forces, and also the white men, who were pressed into the service. In Massachusetts, thirty years later, all who had any hand in the Narraganset campaign, both from Massa chusetts and Plymouth, whether volunteers or " impressed," were made grantees. Connecticut s volunteers, in 1701, were found to be about one hundred and eighty. ENROLLMENT LIST. A list of the Names of the English Volunteers in the late Narragan set War, as folio we th : 1 Major Edward Palmes. 2 Capt George Denison. 3 Lieut. Thomas Leffingwell. 4 Major "Wait Winthrop. 5 Rev. Mr. James Fitch. 6 Sargt. John Frink. 7 Capt. James Avery. 8 James Avery. 9 John Avery. 10 Thomas Avery. 11 Joshua Baker. 12 John Wickwier. 13 Ephraim Colver. 14 William Potts. 15 Edward Colver. 16 Samuel Yeouians. 17 John Lewis. 18 John Fish. 19 Samuel Fish. 20 William Williams. 21 George Denison. 22 William Denison. VOLUNTOWN, CONNECTICUT. 443 23 Nathaniel Beebe. 24 Henry Stephens. 25 Edmond Fanning. 26 Thomas Fanning. 27 John Bennett (dec d). 28 William Bennett. 29 Thomas Rose. 30 Philip Bill (dec d). 31 Philip Bill. 32 Deny Springer. 33 Ezekiel Mayn. 34 William Wheeller. 35 Thomas Wooster. 36 Gershom Palmer. 37 Jonathan Armstrong. 38 Samuel Stanton. 39 Robert Stanton. 40 Daniel Stanton. 41 James Morgan. 42 John Keene. 43 John Latham. 44 John Waterhouse. 45 Joseph Morgan. 46 Nathaniel Park. 47 William Douglace. 48 Manasseth Miner. 49 James Willit. 50 Rev. James Noyes. 51 Capt. John Stanton. 52 Joseph Stanton. 53 Aaron Stark (dec d). 54 John Stark (dec d) . 55 James York (dec d). 56 Thomas Bell (dec d) . 57 Lieut. Thomas Miner. 58 Richard Bushnell. 59 Samuel Lathrop. 60 Solomon Tracy. 61 John Willey (dec d). 62 Samuel Tubbs (dec d) . 63 Robert Park. 64 Peter Spiser (dec d) . 65 Jonathan Rudd. 66 Richard Cook (dec d). 67 Thomas Park (dec d). 68 Henry Elliott (dec d) . 69 Thomas Bliss (dec d) . 70 Isaac Wheeler. 71 Peter Cross. 72 Jonathan Gennings. 73 Caleb Fobes. 74 John Gallop. 75 Adam Gallop. 76 William Gallop. 77 Nathaniel Cheesebro. 78 Ephraim Miner. 79 Joseph Miner. 80 Samuel Miner (dec d) . 81 John Ashcraft (dec d). 82 Joshua Holmes (dec d). 83 Capt. Ebenezer Johnson. 84 Joseph Wheeler. 85 Sergt. Moses Johnson. 86 Daniel Tracy. 87 Edmond Fanning. 88 William Roberts. 89 John Denison. 90 Mathew Griswold. 91 Richard Lord. 92 Stephen Dewolf. 93 Richard Smith. 94 John Smith. 95 Francis Smith. 96 Moses Huntly. 97 Henry Bennett. 98 Henry Peterson. 99 Samuel Stephens. 100 Henry Hall. 101 William Champlin. 102 Capt. Pembleton. 103 Daniel Crumb. 104 Nicholas Cottrell. 105 John Pameter. 106 Samuel Roger. 107 John Hull. 108 Daniel Kelsie. 109 John Miutor. 110 John Stephens. 111 Ebenezer French. 112 John Griswold. 113 Nehemiah Smith. 114 John Wheeler. 115 Nathaniel Haiden (dec d), 116 Joseph Hull (dec d). 117 Samuel Sheather (dec d). 118 John Charles (dec d). 119 Samuel Frisbie (dec d). 120 John Plant (dec d) . 121 Samuel Fox. 122 Jacob Joy. 123 Clement Minor. 124 William Pendall. 125 Daniel Stubbins. 126 John Hough. 444 KING PHILIP S WAR. 127 Samuel Roberts. 128 Joshua Abell. 129 Thomas Rood. 130 William Knights. 131 Mathew Jones. 132 Thomas Williams. 133 Joseph Waterhouse. 134 Richard Dart. 135 Samuel Hough. 136 William Hough. 137 Abel More. 138 Jeremiah Blake. 139 John Plumb. 140 Thomas Hungerford. 141 John Packer. 142 Samuel Packer. 143 Nathaniel Holt. 144 Robert Lord. 145 John Woller. 146 Richard Smith. 147 Edward Dewolf. 148 Aaron Huntly. 149 James Murffey. 150 Robert Holmes. 151 Daniel Comstock. 152 George Chappell. 153 Thurston Reinerd. 154 Hugh Rowland. 155 John Lathrop. 156 James Welch. 157 Daniel Clark. 158 Edward Shipman. 159 Joseph Ingarum. 160 Joseph Colver. 161 William Billings. 162 John Shaw. 163 Stephen Richeson. 164 165 166 Roger Orris. 167 James Danielson. 168 169 Ebenezer Billings. 170 Jonathan Burtch. 171 William Johnson. 172 Samuel Richarson. 173 Thomas Brand. 174 William Champlin. 175 John Babcock. 176 Edward Larkin. 177 Daniel Shaw. 178 Thomas Renols. 179 William Lees. 180 Rev. Moses Noise. 181 John Larabe. 182 Joseph Northrop. 183 Robert Old. 184 Nathan Gillet. 185 John Somes. TOWN CLERK S OFFICE, VOLUNTOWN, December 23, 1860. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a correct extract from the Records of Voluntown, except some of the spelling. Attest ELISHA POTTER, Town Clerk. LIST OF VOLUNTEERS WHO DREW " CEDAR SWAMP" LOTS. 1 Edward DeWolf. 2 Ephraim Culver. 3 John Ashcroft. 4 Caleb Fobes. 5 Robert Stanton. 6 Samuel Frisbee. 7 John Gallup. 8 William Potts. 9 Ebenezer Billings. 10 Richard Bushnell. 11 Philip Bill. 12 Sargt. JohnFrink. 13 Capt. Pendleton. 14 Peter Cross. 15 Joshua Abell. 16 John Parker. 17 Clement Miner. 18 James Welch. 19 Manassah Miner. 20 21 Daniel Stanton. 22 Thomas Wooster. VOLUNTOWN, CONNECTICUT. 445 23 Richard Lord. 24 Samuel Miner. 25 Gersham Palmer. 26 Samuel Rogers. 27 Henry Hall. 28 Thomas Rood. 29 Joshua Baker. 30 George Denison. 31 Richard Cook. 32 Rev. Moses Noyes. 33 Edmond Fanning. 34 John Waller. 35 Jonathan Jennings. 36 John Stark. 37 Joseph Hull. 38 Edmond Fanning. 39 Robert Old. 40 Benaiah Bushnel. 41 Samuel Lathrop. 42 Joseph Wheeler. 43 John Shaw. 44 John Kinne. 45 Samuel Roberts. 46 Nicholas Cotteral. 47 Ezekiel Maine. 48 Edward Colver. 49 John Lathrop. 50 Aaron Huntley. 51 Samuel Richards. 52 John Hough. 53 John Fanning. 54 Samuel Stephens. 55 Samuel Parker. 56 William Knight. 57 William Potts. 58 John Palmetor. 59 John Plant. 60 Rev. James Fitch. 61 John Griswold. 62 Capt. Geo. Denison. 63 64 Thomas Williams. 65 Robert Holmes. 66 John Minton. 67 Samuel Fox. 68 Maj. Wait Winthrop. 69 Nathaniel Holt. 70 Mathew Jones. 71 Jacob Joy. 72 Aaron Stark. 73 John Lewis. 74 Thomas Ross. 75 John Stephens. 76 John Avery. 77 Samuel Shother. 78 Samuel Yeomans. 79 Ephraim Miner. 80 George Chappie. 81 Daniel Tracy. 82 William Roberts. 83 Solomon Tracy. 84 Thomas Bliss. 85 Samuel Tubs. 86 Nathaniel Cheesebro. 87 Richard Smith. 88 ( Capt. Ebenezer Johnson. ( Sargt. Moses Johnson. 89 Thomas Reynolds. 90 Rev. James Noyes. 91 Thomas Park. 92 Matthew Griswold. 93 Francis Smith. 94 Henry Paterson. 95 Nathan Gillit. 96 John Wickwire. 97 Joseph Ingraham. 98 Jeremiah Blage (Black). 99 Nehemiah Smith. 100 Robert Park. 101 Daniel Clark. 102 Richard Smith, Sen. 103 Henry Elliot. 104 John Waterhouse. 105 Roger Orris. 106 William Billings. 107 Daniel Kelsey. 108 Peter Spicer. 109 John Latham. 110 Jonathan Armstrong. 111 Daniel Crumb. 112 113 William Bennett. 114 William Douglass. 115 William Wheeler. 116 Demsy Springer. 117 Henry Stephens. 118 Nathaniel Haiden. 119 Moses Huntley. 120 Philip Bill. 121 James Danielson. 122 Richard Dart. 123 Ebenezer French. 124 William Lee (Lees). 125 Daniel Shaw. 446 KING PHILIP S WAR. 126 Joshua Holmes. 127 John Wheeler. 128 Samuel Stanton. 129 James Murphy. 130 Joseph Morgan. 131 132 William Williams. 133 134 135 Stephen Dewolf. 136 Joseph Northrop. 137 Hugh Rowland. 138 Daniel Comstock. 139 Thomas Fanning. 140 Joseph Stanton. 141 Jonathan Rudd. 142 JohnWilley. 143 William Gallup. 144 Robert Lord. 145 Lieut. Thomas Lefflngwell. 146 Maj. Edward Palmer. 147 Edward Shipman. 148 Isaac Wheeler. 149 John Charles. 150 Abel Moir. 151 William Johnson. 152 John Plumb. 153 John Hull. 154 Thomas A very. 155 Edward Larkin. 156 Nathaniel Park. 157 Thurston Rainard. 158 Capt. James Avery. 159 John Fish. 160 Samuel Fish. 161 Adam Gallup. 162 John Lummis. 163 Thomas Hungerford. 164 Daniel Stubbins. 165 Lieut. Thomas Miner 166 Nathaniel Beebe. 167 Capt. John Stantou. 168 James Morgan. 169 James York. 170 Joseph Miner. 171 William Denison. 172 Stephen Richardson. 173 John Denison. 174 Joseph Culver. 175 Samuel Hough. 176 Moses Bennett. 177 John Smith. 178 James Avery. 179 Joseph Waterhouse. 180 James Willet. 181 John Bennett. 182 Thomas Bill. The names in Mr. Wheeler s List, not found in the Cedar Swamp List : William Hough. Jonathan Burtch. John Somes. John Babcock. Thomas Brand. John Larabe. These last names were enrolled after the Cedar Swamp lots were drawn, and probably were assigned to the blank numbers. LATER CREDITS FOR MILITARY SERVICE. 447 LATER CREDITS FOR MILITARY SERVICE. FBOM JOHN HULL S LEDGER. The following names are gleaned from later Ledger Accounts of Treasurer John Hull. It will be seen that the credits of the Journal, heretofore given, close with the date September 23, 1676. The war continued for some time longer, and many whose names are already given did not there receive credit for their later service in the Journal accounts. Now the old Ledger helps out in these accounts, but also shows the new men engaged in the service ; and I here add only the new names in general. This fortunate "overlapping" of the Ledger accounts occurs in the following way: In posting his Journal accounts, at first, Mr. Hull divided the Ledger pages for four accounts on each page. When he had filled the Ledger through the first time, he turned back, and used the spaces unused or unlikely to be used ; and on most pages this gave four or five new accounts. It was in the last of these new accounts (and I judge that the process was repeated twice) that the items below are found. Of course the names are not assigned to any particular officer or service, but in many cases certain towns are mentioned through whose officers the soldiers received payment. This mention does not prove residence, but may serve in some cases to identify the names when taken with other facts. The list shows the names of those who served in the later months of 1676, and probably some who had not received credit for earlier services. The arrangement under towns, etc., is of course, my own. AMESBURY. December 24, 1676. John Weed 01 04 00 ANDOVER. February 24, 1676-7. John Osgood 01 04 00 BEVERLY. November 24, 1676. Lott Conant 01 13 04 William Ferryman 02 14 00 January 24, 1676-7. Ralph Ellinwood OJ 10 00 BILLERICA. November 24, 1676. Thomas Richardson 01 01 04 February 24, 1676-7. William Chamberlain 01 01 04 BRAINTREE. October 24, 1676. Michael Smith Solomon Veysey Thomas Bass Thomas Holbrook George Bagley 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 06 04 02 08 00 05 04 06 448 KING PHILIP S WAR. CAMBRIDGE. CHELMSFORD. November 24, 1676. November 24, 1676. John Spring 01 00 06 James Harwood 04 11 00 Jonathan Dunster 01 01 05 Daniel Sterling 02 07 00 January 24, 1676. AllinMego 02 03 06 Cornelius Waldoe 00 19 00 Joseph Hildrick 01 01 04 December 24. Joseph Beach 00 17 00 CONCORD. Ephraim Frost 00 12 00 November 24, 1676. John Adams 00 04 00 James Steabridg 00 07 00 William Jones 02 02 00 Ebenezer Wiswell 00 04 06 John Ward 00 03 03 December 24, 1676. Abraham Jackson 00 03 03 Samuel Cowdry 01 04 00 Noale Wiswell 00 03 03 (Irron 00 OS OS January 24, 1676-7. William Willis 00 03 03 Thomas Hydes 02 14 00 Humphry Barrett 07 12 10 William Hartwell 01 05 02 Joseph Bush 02 10 08 DEDHAM. January 24, 1676-7. Jacob Amsden 01 01 04 November 24, 1676. Daniel Stone 01 01 04 Andrew Dewen 00 15 00 John Coleborne 00 15 00 February 24, 1676-7. James Heering 00 15 00 John Amsden 02 02 10 Jeremiah Fuller 01 01 04 John Coller 03 09 00 Samuel Fuller 00 04 04 John Fairbank 00 04 04 Thomas Herring 00 04 04 James Macanab 00 04 04 CHARLESTOWN. William Mekeynis 00 04 04 Samuel Sheers 00 04 04 November 24, 1676. Thomas Aldridg 00 04 04 Stephen Brown 04 10 00 Samuel Rice 01 11 08 James Miller 03 09 08 Thomas Bather wick 01 01 00 January 24, 1676-7. Lawrence Waters 05 16 06 Joseph Skelteane 00 15 04 James Lowden 00 10 00 DORCHESTER. January 24, 1676-7. October 24, 1676. John Codman 00 05 00 John Simson 00 02 06 JohnEllett 06 18 06 Moses Parker 02 07 00 Ebenezer Clapp 00 09 00 James Tucker 00 09 00 Benjamin Leeds 01 02 06 Timothy Brookes 06 04 04 Samuel Boswell 07 06 00 December 24, 1676. Elnathan Dunklin 03 13 06 Elhanan Lyon 00 10 02 February 24, 1676-7. Sftmiifil Carfp.r 00 Ofi 1 January 24, 1676-7. Philir* "naTn/-vJl AO 1 A AA LATER CREDITS FOR MILITARY SERVICE. 449 EXETER. February 24, 1676-7. October 24, 1676. Joseph Merry 02 14 00 Philip Cartey 01 04 00 John Bean 09 04 00 Nehemiah Hobbs 00 12 00 Jacob Brown 01 04 00 Nicholas Norriss 00 12 10 Samuel Fogg 01 04 00 Jonathan Robinson 00 03 04 Jonathan Thwing 00 09 04 Nathaniel Right 00 05 00 James Marston 01 10 00 Nathaniel Boulter 01 10 00 William Marston 01 14 06 Eliezer Elkins 00 11 00 Henry Moulton 02 14 04 Robert Wadly 00 07 00 Christian Dolhof 00 03 04 John Huckins 02 10 06 John Brown 03 13 13 John Young 00 08 06 Kinsley Hall 00 08 06 HINGHAM. Mathew Mitchell 00 06 10 December 24, 1676-7. James Perkins 01 07 04 William Woodcock 00 13 00 Moses Levett 01 06 06 BilyDudly 01 00 06 Robert Smart 00 06 03 John Wedgewood 00 03 04 January 24, 1676-7. Simon Gross 01 12 06 John Foalsam 00 03 04 John Oilman, Jr. 00 12 09 IPSWICH. William Houldrige 00 02 06 November 24, 1676. Daniel Gilman 01 09 00 John Edwards 01 10 06 Henry Magoon 00 01 08 Josiah Briggs 01 16 00 Samuel Foulsam 00 01 08 Jonathan Lummas 01 10 00 William Moor 01 12 06 Henry Sparkes 00 05 00 December 24, 1676. Thomas Rawlins 00 03 04 Samuel Levett 00 06 10 John Barber 00 14 06 John Gilman 05 15 06 Moses Gilman 01 01 04 Peter Folsam 00 18 10 Richard Lewis 10 11 06 Thomas Bray 04 04 00 William Quarles 01 00 00 Jeremiah Jewett 01 05 08 Samuel Hunt 08 04 00 David Robertson 00 01 08 George Stimson 03 18 00 January 24, 1676-7. Jacob Wheeler 15 00 00 William Story 02 10 00 John Gilbert 03 17 10 GLOUCESTER. Abraham Knowlton 02 14 00 Andrew Peters 02 14 00 December 24, 1676. Christopher Bolls 01 05 08 Joseph Clark 04 04 00 Nathaniel Emerson 02 14 00 Nathaniel Larnpson 00 18 00 January 24, 1676-7. Thomas Jaques 01 12 10 Vincent Davis 02 14 00 Andrew Burley 01 05 08 HAMPTON. February 24, 1676-7. December 24, 1676. John Lambert 02 11 00 John Pingry 01 04 00 John Philbrick 02 14 00 Aaron Pingry 03 06 06 John Huggin 02 14 00 Nathaniel Lord 03 06 06 John Bray 00 18 10 Job Bishop 02 03 06 450 KING PHILIP S WAR. LYNN. November 24, 1676. Aquilla Ramsdell 01 10 00 December 24, 1676. John Edmonds Samuel Johnson Nathaniel Cartland Thomas Farrar John Witt 00 11 05 00 11 05 00 13 08 00 11 05 00 17 00 January 24, 1676-7. George Bagwell 01 10 00 February 24, 1676-7. Daniel Gott 02 01 00 William Barber 02 08 00 John Haven 03 07 06 Robert Potter 02 01 00 MALDEN. January 24, 1676-7. Thomas May 02 02 00 February 24, 1676-7. Thomas Dickerman 01 01 04 Edward Despaw 02 04 06 MARBLEHEAD. November 24, 1676. Griffin Harris 02 16 00 Thomas Beaues 04 04 00 December 24, 1676. Edward Creeke 11 09 00 February 24, 1676-7. Richard Pearse 03 08 00 John Cleves 05 09 06 MARLBOROUGH. December 24, 1676. James Vales 01 11 00 MEDFIELD. December 24, 1676. Nathaniel Allen 00 11 08 MED FORD. November 24, 1676. James Stoakes 02 14 00 February 24, 1676-7. Thomas Philybrown 01 01 04 MILTON. October 24, 1676. Blaze Sleth 00 04 00 William Dennison 00 09 00 February 24, 1676-7. Daniel Dike 07 00 06 NEWBCRY. November 24, 1676. Samuel Lowell 03 00 00 George Moyer 02 14 00 Moses Little 01 10 10 John Mitchell 01 10 10 Thomas Silver 01 10 10 Joshua Richardson 01 00 00 Timothy Noyce 01 04 00 Peter Uter 01 04 00 Jeremiah Davis 01 04 00 Joseph Little 01 18 00 Joseph Poore 01 04 00 Robert Cham 04 04 00 Henry Lucus 04 04 00 December 24, 1676. John Wheeler 04 04 00 February 24, 1676-7. Matthew LaGreve 08 07 00 QUABAUG. February 24, 1676-7. Thomas Carter 03 18 00 READING. November 24, 1676. James Nickards 04 00 January 24, 1676-7. John Dix 01 02 02 LATER CREDITS FOR MILITARY SERVICE. 451 ROWLEY. October 24, 1676. Zechariah Curtis 00 06 00 February 24, 1676-7. Thomas Lambert 01 05 06 ROXBURY. November 24, 1676. James Leavens 00 12 00 December 24, 1676. Abraham Newell 00 00 06 January 24, 1676-7. Samuel Peirson 02 14 03 RUMNEYMARSH. January 24, 1676-7. Paul Grover 00 14 03 SALEM. December 24, Samuel Sibly Lawrence Dennis John Beckett Isaac Williams Jonathan Prince Benjamin Home Jacob Burton Peter Hamon Thomas Alexander Samuel Ingerson 1676. 14 05 00 01 02 00 00 11 05 00 11 05 02 14 00 01 18 06 10 02 02 02 00 00 01 16 00 02 14 00 January 24, 1676-7. Peter Rogers 01 10 10 February 24, 1676-7. Josiah Brown 01 03 00 Jonathan Very 05 02 00 Nathaniel Putman 02 00 00 James Waitstill 02 03 00 SALISBURY. December 24, 1676. John Diggerson 01 15 06 SUDBURY. December 24, 1676. Jonathan Griffin 01 16 06 Joseph Russell 00 04 00 December 24, 1676. Henry Rice 01 15 00 January 24, 1676-7. Marke Perkins 00 17 00 TOPSFIELD. January 24, 1676-7. James Stanlee 01 11 08 Joseph Estey 01 11 08 February 24, 1676-7. Isaac Easty 03 07 06 WATERTOWN. November 24, 1676. Joseph Grant 01 01 00 December 24, 1676. Benony Lamed 03 13 06 James Cutting 02 14 00 January 24, 1676-7. William Lamed 00 05 00 Joseph Child 03 09 00 Thomas Sawin 01 07 04 February 24, 1676-7. Thomas Underwood 01 10 00 Obadiah Sautell 00 12 00 WENHAM. February 24, 1676-7. Richard Button 00 06 00 Richard Kemball 00 14 00 WEYMOUTH. January 24, 1676-7. William Mills 03 12 10 Edward Skinner 03 08 00 452 KING PHILIP S WAR. WOBDRN. John Avis 01 13 04 November 24, 1676. Robert Butcher Fear-Not Shaw 00 14 00 00 10 02 Joseph Right 00 14 03 David Roberts 01 10 00 January 24, 1676. December 24, 1676. Richard Stains 05 14 00 George Wilkinson 02 14 00 John Stuckley 02 06 02 Ralph King 00 17 02 February 24, 1676-7. Thomas Clark, Jr. 00 07 00 7 James Simons 03 09 00 William Killcup Daniel Travis 00 02 06 01 10 00 Samuel Andrews 03 08 00 TOWNS NOT MENTIONED. Thomas Wadduck 03 08 00 October 24, 1676. George Munjoy 03 00 00 Samuel Harrington 00 15 10 John Chappell 02 05 00 John Whitmarsh 02 14 00 Nathaniel Clapp 00 09 00 Nehemiah Clapp 00 09 00 Humphrey 00 09 00 John Kenney 00 09 00 Eleazer Hawes 00 09 00 Bernard Capen 00 09 00 Jonathan Blackman 00 09 00 Samuel Sheffield 00 09 00 William Sables 00 09 00 William Sheffield 00 09 00 John Blake 00 09 00 Benjamin Smith 03 00 00 David Hartshorn 08 05 00 Henry Raynor 15 00 00 John Tebb 02 07 00 Philip Mosarvy 01 10 00 Thomas Lock 04 03 00 Solomon Loud 08 02 00 John Hudson 02 14 00 Oliver Missatt 00 09 04 David Middleton 03 05 00 Solomon Woodis 04 12 06 Walter Cohone 01 14 02 Thomas Clark 06 00 00 George Welch Thomas Mitchell John Drake John Luce Aaron Beard William Lee Hozea Mallett John Jent John Torry Joseph Read John Atkins Edward Cowles Mathew Williams Peter Indian Samuel Holman Thomas Cloies John Bucke Cromwell Indian Michel Read Brattles Man Silvanus Davis Edward Brooks Josiah Baker Samuel Woodee Thomas Rucke William Downes Joseph Hasee 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 02 14 00 03 08 00 03 08 00 03 02 00 03 08 00 00 10 02 02 14 00 02 14 00 01 11 00 01 01 04 02 14 00 01 05 00 03 08 00 00 12 10 02 14 00 05 09 06 01 09 00 06 04 00 00 04 02 00 04 02 00 04 02 00 04 02 00 04 02 00 04 02 Samuel Winch 01 10 00 February 24, 1676-7. December 24, 1676. Thomas Groce 02 09 00 Mongo Craford 10 07 00 Abraham Quiddington 02 03 08 William Crane 11 01 00 William Nicholson 02 08 10 JohnWindoome 01 10 10 Nicholas Lash 00 04 02 John Woolly 01 13 04 John Davis 04 01 00 Richard Priest 18 00 00 Richard Willin 03 05 00 William Griggs 01 04 00 James Sawyer 00 08 06 LATER CREDITS FOR MILITARY SERVICE. 453 There was a later Ledger, mentioned before, into which Mr. Hull carried the closing accounts of the war. These accounts, however, have little except names and wages, with very few additional facts. We remember that while these accounts of Mr. Hull are, by far, the most complete of any existing roll of early colonial soldiers, they give little besides the facts of ser vices and wages. In the dingy old documents contained in the Mass. Archives, are many petitions, and other references, which speak of almost incredible hardships, of manly fortitude and devotion, which lift many a name here, out of the dull lists of " Military Service," and up into the ranks of heroes and patriots. Many such references appear in the foregoing pages, like that of Widow Mary Turner after Capt. Turner s death; that of Lieut. John Wyrnan and others. Many others whose names are not here, appear in the old documents referred to ; like that of Benjamin Rockwood (Rocket), who, in a later Ledger, has credit for Military Service, in 1677. In Mass. Archives, vol. 72, pp. 622- 624, several original documents are found showing that he was a soldier in Philip s war, was in service at the Westward, and then was sent, under Capt. Swett, to the Eastward; and at Blackpoynt, was twice severely wounded, and was confined in Salem Hospital for " a quarter of a year." A memorial of his townsmen testifies to the facts, and other evidence shows that he had " two bullets in his thigh." Much more is found about this last case, which, being typical of the times and men, doubt less had many parallels, if we knew all. APPENDIX. PLYMOUTH COLONY. GOVERNORS, 1620-1692. JOHN CARVER, November, 1620, to April, 1621. WILLIAM BRADFORD, 1621-1633, 1635-1637, 1639-1644, 1645-1657 EDWARD WINSLOW, 1633, 1636, 1644. THOMAS PRENCE, 1634, 1638, 1657-1673. JOSIAH WINSLOW, 1673-1680. THOMAS HINKLEY, 1681-1692. (Except the Andros administration.) CAPT. MYLES STANDISH was the first military officer of New England, and, as long as he lived, the chief military leader of Plymouth colony. Came in the "Mayflower" to Plymouth with wife Rose, who died January 29, following the landing. By his second wife, Barbara, he had the five children mentioned in his will of March 7, 1656. Four sons, Alexander, Myles, Josiah, and Charles survived him, his daughter Lora already deceased. Through these sons a numerous posterity followed. He was one of the chief of the Pilgrims, and besides being always commander-in-chief of the military, was treasurer for twelve years, and assistant for some eighteen years. He died Oct. 3, 1656, and is buried in Duxbury, according to the request in his will. Upon the hill which formed a part of his Duxbury estate, known as " The Captain s Hill," stands the noble " Standish Monument," of granite, surmounted by a fine statue of Capt. Standish. He was regularly chosen as captain, Febru ary, 1621, though he was understood to be captain from the compact, Nov. 11, 1620. Other prominent officers of the militia of Plymouth colony, from 1620 to 1678, with year of appointment : CAPTAINS. Thomas Willett, Plymouth, 1648 Thomas Southworth, Plym outh, 1659 James Cudworth, Scituate, 1652 Nath 1 Thomas, Marshfield, 1644 Josiah Winslow, Marshfield, 1655 William Poole, Taunton, 1638 William Hedge, Yarmouth, 1659 Thomas Howes, Yarmouth, 1674 Matthew Fuller, Barnstable, 1668 456 KING PHILIP S WAR. LIEUTENANTS. William Holmes, Plymouth, 1635 John Vassell, Scituate, 1652 James Torrey, Scituate, 1655 Peregrine White, Marshfield, 1655 Ephraim Morton, Plymouth, 1664 Samuel Nash, Duxbury, 1645 Josias Standish, Bridgewater,1660 George Macy, Taunton, 1665 Peter Hunt, Rehoboth, 1654 Isaac Bucke, Scituate, 1670 John Smith, Dartmouth, 1674 William Palmer, Yarmouth, 1643 Samuel Ryder, Yarmouth, 1653 John Marchant, Yarmouth, 1670 John Blackmore, Sandwich, 1638 William Newland, Sandwich, 1647 John Ellis, Sandwich, 1653 Joseph Rogers, Eastham, 1647 Thomas Dimmock, Barn- stable, 1643 Thomas Hay ward, jr. , Bridge- water, 1664 James Wyatt, Taunton, 1651. In the year 1643 an official canvass of every town in Plymouth Colony was made, to find the men, between the ages of sixteen and sixty years, who were able to bear arms. These lists are preserved in the Plymouth Records, but I have not thought best to insert them here, as the men were not properly soldiers. In 1643, a more compact and responsible military organization was established in the three towns, Plymouth, Duxbury, and Marshfield. While a careful canvass of the colony was made that year, and account taken of every man "able to bear arms," this company was made up of chosen men, and was independent. None were received unless they were freemen, honest, and of good repute, and by the election of the members of the company. Training exercises were begun and ended with prayer. Strict order was enjoined, and any infringement of rules was punished with dismission from the company. Each man, upon election, must provide himself with a musket or sword, rest, bandoleers, etc. Only one third of whole company were allowed to carry pikes. The following rules were in force : "All who are elected chief officers in this military company shall be so titled and forever afterwards so reputed, except he obtain a higher place. That every man enlisted in this company shall pay sixpence a quarter for the use of the company. That when any one of this company dies, the company shall come together with their armes, upon warning, and interr his corps as a soldier, and ac cording to his place and quality. All must take the oath of fidelity before admission to the company. All postures of pike and muskett, motions rankes and files, &c., messengers, skirmishes, sieges, bat teries, watches, sentinells, &c., must be always performed according to true military discipline." The officers appointed over this company were, Capt. Myles Standish, Lieut. Nath 1 Thomas, Nath 1 . Souther, Clark, Matthew Fuller, ) Samuel Nash, j The entire militia of Plymouth Colony, in 1658, was organized into a regiment, of which Josiah Winslow, of Marshfield, was APPENDIX. 457 chosen Major-Commandant, and he held that office until his election as governor of the colony, in 1673, when Mr. William Bradford was chosen to that place. A cavalry company was organized in the colony in 1659, with William Bradford, of Plymouth, Captain, John Freeman, of Eastham, Lieutenant, and Robert Stetson, of Scituate, Cornet; but for neglecting the re quirements of the Court in procuring carbines, was disbanded by a general order June 1, 1675. ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE. Upon active military operations, officers and men were selected from the various towns by military committees for the special service. The first actual Indian war, after the earlier skirmishes, was the war with the Pequods, the story of which has been told above. The following document shows the action taken by the Court of Plymouth : At the General Court held in Plymouth June 7, 1637, It was enacted that the colony send forth a company to aid Mas sachusetts and Connecticut in their war against the Pequod Indians, in revenge of the innocent blood of the English which the Pequods have shed. Thirty persons shall be sent for land service, and as many others as shall be sufficient to manage the barque. Leiftenant William Holmes is elected as leader of the company. Mr. Thomas Prence is elected to go with the company and to be for the " Counsell of War." Names of the soldiers who volunteered to go upon the service, but were not called into active service. Thomas Clarke, Francis Billington, Richard Church, Henry Willis, George Soule, Peregrine White, Samuell Jenney, Caleb Hopkins, Constance Southerne, Samuell Nash, John Barnes, Robert Mendall, Mr. Nathaniell Thomas, and his Henry Sampson, man, Thomas Redding, Mr. Goarton, Love Brewster, John Cooke (if his family can be Joseph Robinson, his man, provided) , Edward Holman, Mr. Stephen Hopkins, William Paddy, John Heyward, John Hearker, Thomas Williams, Richard Clough, Nicholas Presland, Henry Ewell, Thomas Pope, Joseph Biddle, Philip Delanoy, William Tubbs, George Kennerick, Thomas Halloway, John Irish, John Jenkins, Jacob Cooke, Giles Hopkins, John Philips, Thomas Goarton. 458 KING PHILIP S WAR. And those who will go if they be prest. Mr. Thomas Hill, Thomas Boardman, James Coale. THE EXPEDITION AGAINST THE NARRAGANSETS IN 1645. The proportion and names of the souldiers in each Town sent forth in the late Expedition against the Narrohigansets and their Confeder ates. The first Company, viz., sixteen, went forth Aug. 15, 1645. Plymouth, six men, 17 days, 5:02:00. John Tompson, Richard Foster, John Bundy, Nicholas Hodges, John Shawe, Samuell Cutbert. Duxborough, six men, 17 days, 5:02:00. Serj 1 . Samuell Nash, William Brewster, William Clark, John Washborne, Nathaniell Chaundler, Edward Hall. Marshfield, four men, 17 days, 3:08:00. Luke Lillye, Twyford West, William Hale, Roger Cooke. The second Company went forth 23 d . August, 1645. Plymouth, two men, 13 days, 1:06:00. John Jenkins, John Harman. Sandwich, jive men, 13 days, 3:05:00. Thomas Burges, Thomas Greenfield, Laurence Willis, Thomas Johnson, Rob te Allen. Scittuate, eight men, 13 days, 5:04:00. John Turner, George Russell, Jeremiah Burrowes, Hercules Hill, Edward Saunders, Nathaneill Moate, John Robinson, Richard Toute. BarnstaUe, four men, 14 days, 2:16:00. John Foxwell, John Russell, Jonathan Hatch, Francis Crocker. Yarmouth, five men, 14 days, 3:10:00, drumer extra, 0:5:00. William Northcoate, William Twyning, Teague Jonaes, Henry Wheildon, William Chase, drummer. Both companies returned Tuesday, Sept. 2, 1645, and were disbanded the following day. APPENDIX. 459 Each soldier on going forth was supplied with 1 Ib. of powder, and 3 Ibs. of bullets, and 1 Ib. of tobacco. Taunton, Rehoboth, alias Seacunck, were not required to furnish men, as they were frontier towns and "billetted" the "souldiers" while out. The items charged in the accounts of this expedition are of interest as showing the kind of supplies used and the prices. It : for a line to Mr. Hanbury 00 :02 :00. It : Dussen knives given to messengers 00 :02s :06d. " For Casting of Shott, 5s. It: Drumheads, 7s. " Spent of the Money and beads the Captain had, 02 :05 :05. " Work done by Gorame, 00:04:00. It: James Coles bill 14 :02 :00. " A horsehire 11 days 00 :11 :00 " 25 Ibs of powder taken at the barke by the Captain to bring the men home again 02:10:00. " 75 Ibs of biskett the Capt. had at the barke to "vittaile his men homewards " for which is allowed one hundred weight 00:16s:00d. " Allowed towards the carriage of provisions to Seacunck, which came by sea out of the Bay 02 :00 :00. Tobacco allowed 00 :27s :04d. The sum total was 66 :03 :03. The provisions were carried in canvas bags. While the organization of the militia was efficiently kept up in Plymouth Colony from 1643 onward, and large preparations were made in 1653 and 1654 for war with the Dutch at Man hattan, no actual hostilities occurred until June, 1675. In 1653 a " Council of War " was appointed to take charge of all preparations for the expedition against the Dutch. This council consisted of Mr. William Bradford, President, Mr. Thomas Prence, Mr. John Alden, Mr. Timothy Hatherly, Capt. Myles Standish, Capt. Thomas Willett, Capt. James Cud worth, Mr. John Browne and Lieut. Thomas Southworth. These appointed an expedition to be sent out to join the other colonies, consisting of sixty men from Plymouth, with Capt. Myles Standish as Commander, Matthew Fuller as Lieutenant, and Hezekiah Hoare as Ensign. Two barks were also to be impressed for the expedition, viz. : " The barque which George Watson sayleth, with himself as master, and John Green and John Smith of same barque." The expedition was still in preparation, June 20, 1654, when a full commission was granted to Capt. Standish to prosecute the war. Peace was settled between the two nations before the colonies became actively engaged. The account of Philip s War in the preceding pages neces sarily followed the fortunes of the officers and companies of Massachusetts, as the Treasurer s credits to these were the 460 KING PHILIP S WAR. basis of my work. No such lists have been found pertaining to Plymouth or Connecticut Colonies, and the particulars of the services of the soldiers of these colonies have not had contemporary chroniclers, like Hubbard, Mather, and the authors of the "Letters to London," so often quoted in this volume. In Philip s War, Plymouth Colony took the initiative, and had men in the field several days before the arrival of the Massa chusetts companies at Swansey. In the Records of the United Commissioners, vol. II. p. 362, is a letter from Josiah Winslow and Thomas Hinckley, recount ing the events, in the Plymouth Jurisdiction, leading up to the outbreak of the war, the first overt act being the rifling of the house of Job Winslow at Swansey, on June 18th or 19th, 1675. On the next day, Sunday, June 20th, the Indians burned several houses at Swansey while the people were at church, upon the alarm of which, and a threatened general assault, Plymouth Colony sent a force of soldiers to protect the town. On the 24th of June Thomas Layton (Mr. Hubbard says Layton Archer) was killed at Fallriver, and on the 25th, several at Swansey. The Plymouth forces, hastily collected, rendezvoused at Taunton, June 21st, under command of Major Bradford, and next day marched, under Capt. James Cudworth, to Swansey, where they were garrisoned at the houses of Mr. John Brown and Rev. John Miles. There the Massachusetts forces soon joined them, and, the war being in the Plymouth Jurisdiction, Capt. Cudworth became Commander-in-Chief, with the title of Major. Mr. Hubbard relates that a company of seventeen men from Bridgewater were the first to arrive at Swansey, and were im mediately ordered to Matapoiset to strengthen Bourne s garrison, wherein were seventy persons, of whom but sixteen were men. At this time there were many " strange Indians " mixed in with Philip s own, and these were reckless tramps and adventurers, mostly. One of the requests of the Plymouth authorities was that these should be sent away by Philip. Philip himself had many good friends among the people living near him, with whom he had had dealings, and found them kind and honest. He is said to have given strict orders not to disturb them or their fami lies. Among these were Mr. John Brown, Capt. Thomas Willett, and Mr. James Leonard of Taunton ; and when James Brown, son of the above, was sent to Philip to persuade peace, while many of his warriors urged that he be retained as captive, or be put to death, Philip sent him home safely guarded. The house of Capt. Willett seems to have been undisturbed, and when, a year later, his son Hezekiah Willett was killed by some strange Indians, it was without the knowledge of Philip or the Wampanoags. Jethro, a negro slave of Capt. Willett s, was taken at the same APPENDIX. 461 time as a captive, but escaped afterwards, in good time to warn the English of a raid planned by the Indians. His story was that the Indians, who killed his young master and made him captive, carried the head of Willett to Philip, who, with his people, was greatly grieved, and, taking the head, mourned over it, and showed it great honor, as for a good friend, combing the hair and orna menting it with beads of wampum. Mr. Hubbard relates that the first persons killed in the war were the six men who ventured from Bourne s garrison with carts to take some corn from a barn, " one Jones " being the only name I have found of those slain. The people at this place were soon after taken over to Rhode Island. In June, 1675, Taunton was attacked by a prowling band of the savages, and the houses of James Walker and John Tisdell were burned, and Tisdell was killed. At the same time two soldiers from Eastham, serving there, were killed ; their names were John Knowles and Samuel Atkins. In May, 1676, in that part of Taunton which became Raynham, six men were killed while at work in the field planting, viz., Henry Andrews, James Bell, Sergt. James Phillips, and in another part of the town Edward Bobit, or Babbitt ; while two youths were taken captive. At Eel River, near Plymouth, March 12, 1675-6, the house of William Clark was assaulted by a small party of Indians led by Tatoson, and Mrs. Clark and an infant, with eight other per sons from other families, were killed. At the trial of divers In dians captured by Major Bradford, were several who had a hand with Tatoson, from whose confessions the names of all were learned. Although these Indians, most of them, surrendered under the proclamation of the Governor, those who had had any part in the war were mostly sold into servitude out of the country, often with their wives and children, while those who had killed any of the English were at once put to death. Among those who surrendered was one called " John Num," who was accused of having part in the Clark murders, and also confessed that he was with the company which killed Jacob Mitchell and his wife, and John Pope, at Dartmouth. Of the whole number of the per petrators of the Clark s House outrage, eleven in all, the names were proved and stand upon record. Those captured, tried, and beheaded were the said " John Num," " Woodcocke," " Quana- pawhan ; " while Keweenam was proved an accessory and also executed. Tatoson was hunted down, but died in the woods, uncaptured. The " Entertaining History " of Philip s War, written by Ben jamin Church, of Little Compton, Rhode Island, gives many in teresting details, in his own personal experience, and casual references and items, which would otherwise be lost. Being joined with the Plymouth forces his stories relate mostly to their operations, or those in which he, personally, played the 462 KING PHILIP S WAR. leading part. The invasion of Pocasset by Capt. Mathew Fuller and himself, with thirty-six men, his fight, with his small party, at Punketees Neck with several hundred savages, until rescued by Captain Roger Golding s vessel, is a story of intense interest ; and by his graphic descriptions of events, and oftentimes garru lous narration of personal adventures, he has preserved the very details concerning men and things, which the historians have missed. Many have taken him as a historian of the war, and neglected the real authorities, like Hubbard, Mather, and Gookin. His narrative is simply a compilation of an old man s remin iscences, written out some forty years after their actual occur rence, and we can readily understand that the long years and the frequent relation of his experiences would tend to make his memory fertile in graphic details and personal achievements which contemporaries knew nothing about. Capt. Nathaniel Thomas wrote a letter from Mounthope gar rison on August 10th, with details of the course of events upon Philip s escape, July 29th, and does not mention Mr. Church. The story, nearly as Capt. Thomas tells it, is followed in the introductory chapter. He mentions that "thirty Stonington men " joined in the pursuit at Rehoboth, and says that in the fight with Philip s and Weetamoo s warriors at " Nipsachick," the Mohegans " stripped " the enemies whom they had slain, and " skinned their heads." The captive whom they wounded and took told them that Philip, Tokomona (brother of Awa- shonks), and the " Black Sachem," were with the enemy ; that Awashouks had gone over among the Narragansets at the beginning of the war; that Nimrod was slain in the fight. Capt. Thomas relates that Sergt. John Parker and William Porey were wounded, also, in this skirmish, while twenty-three of the enemy were killed. He severely criticises Capt. Hench man for neglecting to pursue Philip immediately, as they would have done had not Henchman come up and taken command. October 4th, 1675, the Plymouth Court reflected Major James Cudworth as General, or Commander-in-Chief, of the forces of that colony in active service, Sergeant Robert Barker to be Lieutenant of his particular company, Captain John Gorum to be Captain of the other company, and Ensign Jonathan Spar row to be his Lieutenant. Lieut. John Brown is appointed to be Capt. of the guard at Mounthope, with a new company of twenty-five men to be impressed in the various towns, and the guard now there to be released. Capt. Mathew Fuller was appointed to be surgeon-general of all the forces of the colony. The address of the Plymouth Court to the "Gentleman Souldiers," of the Colony, upon the mustering of the United Colonies forces in December, 1675, for the Narraganset campaign, is at once a gracious summons to duty and a fervent appeal to loyalty, with promises that the wages of all the soldiers shall be secured, and APPENDIX. 463 their wants and interests provided for, and that volunteers shall be regarded with special favor. Govr. Josias Winslow was, as we know, appointed Commander- in-Chief over the whole expedition, while Major Bradford was superior officer of the Plymouth forces and Capt. John Gorum captain of the second company. From the " History of Rehoboth," by Leonard Bliss, we gather the following list of the names of those soldiers belonging to Rehoboth who served in the Narraganset campaign : John Fitch, Jonathan Wilmarth, Jasiel Perry, Thomas Kendrick, Jonathan Sabin, John Carpenter, John Redeway, John Martin, John Miller, jun., John Ide, Joseph Doggett. Sampson Mason, jun. Under Major Bradford. Preserved Abell, Samuel Perry, Stephen Paine, jun., Samuel Miller, Silas Allin, Samuel Palmer, James Redeway, Enoch Hunt, Samuel Walker, Nicholas Ide, Noah Mason, Samuel Sabin, Thomas Read, Israel Read, George Robinson, Nathaniel Wilmarth. The above list is confirmed by comparison with Narraganset No. 4, above, except some variations in the spelling, as readily seen. Gen. E. W. Pierce, in his valuable historical researches, has found two other names, both ancestors of his, who were Narraganset soldiers, viz., Isaac Peirce and William Hoskins. These are both found in the list of No. 4, Peirce at Middle- borough and Hoskins, given as Hopkins, of Taunton, both alive, 1734. In March, 1675-6, we find Plymouth Colony promptly trying to redeem her promises to the soldiers who were in the expedi tion, by the granting of several tracts of land to the value of one thousand pounds ; said tracts being located at Showamett, Assonett Neck, Assowamsett, and Agawam and Sepecan, while one thousand pounds was assessed upon the towns of the colony for the present help of those whose condition calls for immediate help instead of payment in lands. There is a tradition that one of the first men slain by the Indians, at Swansey, June 24th, 1675, was Joseph Lewis, a resi dent of that town, who was buried there on that day. There is a story that, on the same day with Peirse s fight nine men became detached from a company, or, possibly, were hastening to the relief of Capt. Peirse, when they were ambushed by a great body of Indians, and all slain and left unburied at a place known as "Camp Swamp," and, sometimes, from this disaster, as "Nine Men s Misery." On the records of Rehoboth are the names of four men who were slain on March 26th, 1676. Two of these 464 KING PHILIP S WAR. were John Fitch (Fitz), jr., and John Miller, jr. The other two were Benj. Buckland and John Reed, jr. These last were not mentioned in the letter of Rev. Noah Newman, above noted, as being in Capt. Peirse s company. It may be that these were of the nine slain at " Camp Swamp," and that the account of the latter disaster had not reached him when, March 27th, he wrote his letter. In the spring of 1676 there was an effort made by the Council of War in Plymouth Colony to raise a force of three hundred men for the defence of their towns, then threatened by the wandering tribes, straggling, in parties, back towards their former homes. This attempt failed, but in June, following, a force of one hundred and fifty English and fifty Indians was put into the field under Major Bradford, and did active service in protecting the south ern towns and capturing the wandering parties of savages, being joined, in July, by Capt. Mosely s company and Capt. Brattle s " Troop." The story of Philip s capture, and the closing events of the war, have been told. The list of those soldiers who had part in the Narraganset Fort Fight are found in the roll of Township No. 7. We find that some of the Plymouth soldiers preferred to be paid in land, according to the oner of the Court. Those of Scituate made application, and their names are preserved and are as follows : Lieut. Isaac Bucke, Zachariah Daman, John Daman, Richard Prowtey, Corp. John Bucke, Jonathan Jackson, Thomas Clarke, William Hatch, Walther Bridges, Joseph Garrett, Richard Dwelley, Benjamin Woodworth. (The last named, "per" Charles Stockbridge.) CONNECTICUT COLONY. GOVERNORS AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNORS, 1639-1689. JOHN HAYNES First Chosen. . . . 1639 Last Chosen, 1653 , Served. 8 yrs. . . . 1640 1654 7 vrs. GEORGE WILLYS .... 1642 1 vr THOMAS WELLES . . . 1655 1658 A j 1 * 2 vrs. JOHN W^EBSTER . . . . . . . . 1656 1 vr . . . 1657 1676 J 4< 18 vrs. . . . 1676 1683 7 vrs. . . . 1683 1687 4 vrs. PSiR EDMUND ANDROSS! . 1687 1689 2 vrs. APPENDIX. 465 DEPUTY OR LIEUTENANT GOVERNORS. First Chosen. Last Chosen. Served. ROGER LUDLOW 1639 1648 3 yrs. JOHN HAYNES 1640 1652 5 yrs. GEORGE WTLLYS 1641 1 yr. EDWARD HOPKINS 1643 1653 6 yrs. THOMAS WELLES 1654 1659 4 yrs. JOHN WEBSTER 1656 1 yr. JOHN WINTHROP 1658 1 yr. JOHN MASON 1660 1669 9 yrs. WILLIAM LEETE 1669 1676 7 yrs. ROBERT TREAT 1676 1808 17 yrs. MILITARY AFFAIRS IN CONNECTICUT COLONY. CAPT. JOHN MASON was the first, and, during his life, the chief military officer of Connecticut. He was trained as a sol dier in the Netherlands, under Sir Thomas Fairfax. He was born in England in 1600, and came to Dorchester as early as 1632, at which time he is first mentioned on the records as in command of an expedition for the capture of the pirate, Bull. He is called Lieutenant, his rank under Fairfax, doubtless. He removed, in 1635, to Windsor, Connecticut, with Mr. Warham s company, and after that was identified with all the leading events in the history of the Connecticut towns. He was the commander, and the hero, in the Pequod war, as we have noted above. From 1637-1641, he was representative to the General Court, Assistant from 1641-1659, then Deputy Governor to 1669. He was appointed Major of the militia of Connecticut Colony, holding that office until his death, Jan. 30, 1672, in his 72d year. He removed from Windsor to Saybrook, 1647, and from thence to Norwich upon its settlement in 1659. His first wife died at Windsor. He married second wife Peck, at Windsor, July, 1639, and had, perhaps, Isabel, certainly Priscilla, b. October, 1641 ; Samuel, July, 1644 ; John, August, 1646 ; Rachel, October, 1648 ; Amy, June, 1650 ; Daniel, April, 1652 ; Elizabeth, August, 1654. Isabel, m. June 17, 1658, John Bissell, of Windsor ; Priscilla, m. Oct. 8, 1664, Rev. James Fitch ; Elizabeth, m. May 8, 1671, Thomas Norton ; Rachel, m. June 12, 1678, Charles Hill. John was the captain of the Nor wich Company, at the Narraganset Fort Fight, and was there so severely wounded that he died next year. Samuel settled at Stonington, and, in 1673, was Lieutenant of the militia there, and, in 1683, Assistant. Capt. Mason left a numerous posterity through sons and daughters. Hon. Jeremiah Mason, the eminent jurist of Massachusetts, was doubly descended from the Major, through Daniel, the son, and Priscilla (Mason) Fitch, the daughter. 466 KING PHILIP S WAR. The following is a list of names of those soldiers of Windsor who were in the Pequod Fort Fight in 1637 : Cap 4 . John Mason, John Dyer, Serg . Benedict Alvord, James Eggleston, Thomas Barber, Nath 1 . Gillet, Thomas Buckland, Thomas Gridley, George Chappel, Thomas Stiles. Serg*. Tho 8 . Stares, Richard Osborn, Tho 8 . Parsons, William Thrall, A Mr. Hedge and Sergt. Nicholas Palmer are also mentioned, and Edward Pattison, of Saybrook. The following soldiers of Hartford received grants of land for services in the Pequod war. Their names are preserved in the ancient Town Record of Hartford : John Branson, William Blumfield, Thomas Bull, Thomas Bunce, Thomas Barnes, Peter Blachford, Benjamin Burr, John Clarke, Thomas Root, Rev. Samuel Stone, John Warner, Nicholas Clarke, Capt. John Cullick, Serg . Philip Davis, Nicholas Disborough, William Heyden, Thomas Hales, Samuel Hales, John Hills, Thomas Hollybut, Thomas Spencer, George Steele. John Halloway, Jonathan Ince, Benjamin Munn, Nicholas Olmstead, Richard Olmstead, John Purchas, William Pratt, William Philips, Thomas Stanton, Samuel Whitehead, The above list is copied from " Hartford in the Olden Time," by " Scaeva." The author adds the names of Thomas Munson, Stephen Hart, Zachary Field, and William Cornwell as probable names to be added to the list. FIRST CONNECTICUT CAVALRY. In 1658, Major John Mason, Commander-in-Chief of the mil itary forces of Connecticut Colony, organized a troop of horse of thirty-seven members : Capt. Richard Lord, of Hartford. Lieut. Daniel Clark, of Windsor. Cornet John Allyn, Hartford. ( Nicholas Olmstead, of Hartford. Corporals -j Richard Treat, of Wethersfield. (^ Samuel Marshall, of Windsor. Quartermaster Thomas Welles, of Hartford. APPENDIX. 467 Of Hartford. Of Windsor. David Milton, Saml. Wyllis, Thomas Allyn, Simon Wolcott, Jacob Mygatt, John Bissell, Thomas Strong, Jonathan Gilbert, George Phelps, John Moses, John Stedman, Stephen Terry, John Porter, James Steele, William Hayden, Of Wethersfield. Daniel Pratt, John Hosford, John Latimer, Andrew Warner, John Williams, John Belden, William Edwards, Nath 1 . Loomis, John Chester, Richard Fellows, Thomas Loomis, Anthony Wright, Robert Reeve, Aaron Cooke, John Palmer. In 1672, this troop contained sixty members. The successive Captains of this troop were : Richard Lord commissioned 1658, Hartford. Daniel Clarke commissioned 1664, Windsor. Samuel Talcott commissioned 1681, Wethersfield. James Richards, Lieut., 1664. The office of Sergeant-Major was created in 1672, and Major John Talcott was the first to hold that office and title in Con necticut. But Major Edward Palmes seems to have succeeded to the authority of Major John Mason, by vote of June 2d, 1672. In 1673, the year after Major Mason s death, the Court appointed a Major and second officer over the militia of each county, viz. : for Hartford, Major Talcott, and Capt. Benj. Newbery, 2d ; New Haven, Major John Nash, and Capt. Treat, 2d; for Fairfield County, Major Nathan Gold, and Capt. Wm. Curtice, 2d; New London, Major John Winthrop, and Lieut. James Avery, 2d. In each county the company of the shire town was considered the first company, and under the immediate command of the Major. The Colonial Records show that the several counties raised cav alry companies or " troops," just before Philip s War. Of the New London troop, Benjamin Brewster was the Lieutenant, and Daniel Mason (son of Major John) was Quartermaster. They were commissioned in October, 1673. August 14th, 1673, with the prospect of a war with the Dutch, the Court ordered that the respective Troops in the colony, with " 500 Dragoones, be prepared and fitted for service forthwith." In case of sending a force out of the country, the following offi cers were appointed : HARTFORD County, Benj. Newbery, Capt. ; Nich. Olmstead, Lieut.; John Wadsworth, Ensign. NEW LON DON, James Avery, Capt. ; Thos. Tracy, Lieut. ; John Deuison, Ensign. NEW HAVEN, Robert Treat, Capt. ; Thos. Munson, Lieut. ; Saml. Newton, Ensign. FAIRFIELD, Mr. Thos. Fitch, Capt. ; Jehu Burr, Lieut. ; Matthew Sherwood, Ensign. The following November Major Talcott was appointed Commander-in-chief of all the forces ; Major Robert Treat, second in command ; Thos. 468 KING PHILIP S WAR. Bull superseded Capt. Newbury; Wm. Curtice was appointed instead of Mr. Fitch ; Capt. Nash succeeded Major Treat ; and Thos. Trowbridge was made Commissary. In 1675, the Captain of the New Haven Company was Wil liam Roswell, and the Lieutenant, Thomas Trowbridge. In the militia, the quota of a full company was sixty-four men, and en titled the company to a captain. Thirty-two members gave right to a lieutenant, and twenty-four to sergeant. A similar rule, perhaps, applied to a troop, with different numbers. WINDSOR TROOPERS (1676). In an old " Book of Rates," at Windsor, is found the follow ing list of troopers : Capt. John Bissell. John Horsford. Capt. Saml. Marshall. John Bissell jr. Anthony Hoskins. John Moses. Nathl. Bissell. Daniel Hayden. Thomas Moore. Capt. Daniel Clark. Joseph Loomis. Mr. John Porter. Edward Chapman. Nathl. Loomis. Mr. Henry Sanders. Thomas Strong. John Terry. Mr. Henry Wolcott. The militia officers in Connecticut, just previous to Philip s War, were as follows, so far as records show : FARMINGTON. William Lewis, Capt.; John Standly, Lieut., 1674. GUILFORD. George Bartlet, Lieut. ; Sam 1 . Kitchel, Ensign, 1665 ; John Graves, Ensign, 1667. HARTFOKD. John Allyn, Capt. ; Thomas Watts, Lieut. ; Nathl. Standley, Ensign, 1673-5. MILFORD. Robert Treat, Capt. ; William Fowler, Lieut., 1665-6. NEW HAVEN. John Nash, Capt.; Thomas Munson, Lieut., 1665; and John Miles, Ensign, 1673. Nath 1 . Merriman, Sam 1 . Whitehead, Roger Allyn, and James Bishop, Serg ts . LYME. William Waller, Lieut., 1671. NORWICH. Francis Griswold, Lieut.; Thos. Tracy, Ensign, 1665; John Mason, Lieut. ; Thomas Lefflngwell, Ensign, 1672. NORWALK. John Olmsted, Ensign, 1674. NEW LONDON. Waitstill Winthrop, Capt. ; James Avery, Lieut. ; Gabriel Harris, Ensign, 1665. RYE. Joseph Horton, Lieut., 1666. SAYBROOK. Rob 1 . Chapman, Capt., 1675 ; Wm. Pratt, Lieut. ; William Waller, Ensign, 1661. STAMFORD. Jona. Sellick, Capt., 1675. STONINGTON. Thomas Minor, Capt., 1665; Samuel Mason, Lieut., 1672. STRATFORD. William Curtis, Capt. ; Joseph Judson, Lieut. ; Stephen Barrett, Ensign, 1672. WALLINGFORD. Nathaniel Merriam, Lieut., 1672; Sam 1 Munson, Ensign, 1675. WETHERSFIELD. Samuel Wells, Capt., 1670; John Chester, Lieut., 1672; William Goodrich, Ensign, 1665. APPENDIX. 469 MASSACHUSETTS COLONY. GOVERNORS AND DEPUTY GOVERNORS. JOHN ENDICOTT, 1629, 1644, 1649, 1655-1665. JOHN WINTHROP, 1630-1634, 1637-1640, 1642-1644, 1646-1649. THOMAS DUDLEY, 1634, 1640, 1645, 1650. JOHN HAYNES, 1635. HENRY VANE, 1636. RICHARD BELLINGHAM, 1641, 1654, 1665-1672. JOHN LEVERETT (acting), 1672. JOHN LEVERETT, 1673-1679. SIMON BRADSTREET, 1679-1686. DEPUTY GOVERNORS. THOMAS DUDLEY, 1629- 34, 37- 40, 46- 50, 51- 53. ROGER LUDLOW, 1634. RICHARD BELLINGHAM, 1635, 40, 53, 55- 65. JOHN WINTHROP, 1636, 44- 46. JOHN ENDICOTT, 1641- 44, 50, 54. FRANCIS WILLOUGHBY, 1665- 71. JOHN LEVERETT, 1671 - 73. SAMUEL SYMONDS, 1673-78. SIMON BRADSTREET, 1678-1686. EARLIEST MILITARY AFFAIRS. Two soldiers came to America, in the company with Win- throp, who were employed to instruct the men of the new colony in military tactics, and direct any warlike operations which might become necessary in defence of their settlement. The first was John Underbill, who had been an officer in the army in the Neth erlands, and had seen service in Ireland and at Cadiz. We have had some notice of him in the account of the Pequod war, in which he bore an honorable part. He joined the church in Bos ton soon after his arrival, and, until after the Pequod war, was in authority and good standing in the colony. Was chosen deputy in 1634. He was evidently impatient of civil and ecclesiastical authority, and did not easily endure command. He became an adherent of Mrs. Hutchinson, and for taking sides with Mr. Wheelwright, was disfranchised, with many other notables. Governor Winthrop devotes much space to the details of Captain Underbill s trial by both court and church. He is shown to have been not only unsound in doctrine and disobedient to the authority of the magistrates, but dissolute in character. He evidently was a handsome and somewhat dashing officer, making much of his soldierly appearance and abilities. He was popular, too, and of winning address, for when he was banished from Massachusetts and went to join Wheelwright at Exeter he was 470 KING PHILIP S WAR. chosen governor by the people at Dover in place of Burdet. After a turbulent rule of some two years he was removed from his office, and returned to Boston, and having made humble confession in church and court, obtained pardon for past offence, and soon after removed to the Dutch settlements on Hudson River, where the governor gave him command of a company against their Indian enemies. After the decisive battle at Stricklands Plain, which settled the Dutch supremacy over the Indians, Captain Underhill settled at Flushing, L.I. He was afterwards in public service, and received a large grant of land from the Indians, which has remained down to a late day in the possession of his descendants. Through his sons John and Nathaniel (perhaps others), he has had many and honorable descendants of his name, and through his daughters, of other names, equally respectable. In his will, of Sept. 16, 1671, he calls himself of Killingworth, Oyster Bay. His story of the Pequod war is valuable. Of the other soldier, Daniel Patrick, who came over with the Winthrop fleet, Governor Winthrop writes : " He was entertained by us out of Holland, where he was a common soldier of the Prince s guard, to exercise our men. We made him a captain and maintained him. Afterwards he was admitted to the church at Watertown and made a freeman. But he grew very proud and vicious, for though he had a wife of his own, a good Dutch woman, and comely, yet he despised her and followed after other women." It seems that he was haughty and insolent in manner, dissolute in character, and when threatened with the process of law fled to the Dutch at Manhattan, He served in the Pequod war, though with small credit, and seems to have been mixed up with some conflict between the Dutch and Indians in 1643, in which he had dealt treacherously with a company of the Dutch and had to flee. He came, it is said, to the house of his old comrade, Underhill, then living near Stamford, Conn. The Dutch pur sued him there, and when their leader, in a personal interview, was grossly insulted by Patrick, he shot him through the head. Some intimation of the warlike preparations made by the Massachusetts company, before embarking, may be seen by the following item, preserved in the records : 26 : February, 1628. Necessaries conceaved meete for our intended voiadge for Newe Eng land to bee prepared forewith. For our 5 peeces of ordnance, long seuce bowght and paid ffor, John Humphry is intreated & doth promise forewith to cause to bee de- lyvered to Samuel Sharpe, who is to take care having fytt cariadges made for them. Armes for 100 men : 3 drums, to ech 2 pere of hedds ; 2 ensignes ; 2 partizans, for capten & lieftenant ; 3 halberts, for 3 sarjants ; 80 bastard musketts, w th snap- hances, four ffoote in the barrill, without rests ; 6 long ffowlinge peeces wth muskett boare, 6 ffoote longe, ; 4 longe ffowlinge peeces, wth APPENDIX. 471 bastard muskett boare, 5 ffoote longe; 10 ffull musketts, 4 ffoote bar- rill, wth matchcocks and rests ; 90 bandeleeres, for the musketts, ech wth a bullett bag ; 10 home fflaskes, for the longe fowling peeces, to hould a Ib. a peece ; & 100 swoordes, and belts ; 60 corsletts, & 60 pikes; 12 bblls powder, 8 barrills for the forte, 4 for small shott ; shott 1 Ib. to a bandeleere ; 8 peeces of land ordnance for the forte, whereof 5 alreddy prouided ; nameley : 2 demie culverings, 30 C. weight a peece, 3 sackers, ech weinge 25 C. wt ; to prouide ; 1 whole culvering, as longe as may bee, 2 small peeces iron drakes ; For great shott, a ffitt proporcion to the ordnance ; A sayne, being a nett to fish with. For the first years after the settlement of the towns of the Massachusetts Colony, the military operations were confined to keeping "guards and watches," and the organization of the militia was incomplete. Casual mention, here and there in the Colonial Records, show that many of the towns had officers with the titles of Captain, etc., but of whose election no record is found. For instance we find, July 26, 1631 : Mr. Francis Aleworth is chosen Lief tenant with Capt. Southcoate. We find no record of his choice to that office. It was Richard Southcoate of Dorchester. At the first Captains Underhill and Patrick were in command of the military in all the towns, with weekly training-days in charge of sergeants under their direction. Sept. 28, 1630, a tax of 50 was levied upon the towns, from Watertown to Weymouth, to support these officers. In 1631, Capt. Underhill held, each month, two general trainings of his company at Boston and Roxbury, and of those at " Charlton, Misticke and the newe-towne " at another date. A better organ ization of the militia was effected in 1636, and a better idea may be given by arranging names according to that appointment, though some of the officers were chosen earlier. Three regi ments were organized, one for each County, Suffolk, Middlesex and Essex. OFFICIAL ROSTER OF MASSACHUSETTS MILITIA. FIRST REGIMENT. Col. John Winthrop, Sr., 1636. Lieut. Col. Thomas Dudley, Sr., 1636. Companies. BOSTON. Capt. John Underhill, 1630; Lieut. Richard Morris, 1633; Lieut. Edward Gibbons, Ensign Robert Harding, 1636. ROXBURY. Lieut. Richard Morris, 1634, and at the Castle. DORCHESTER. Capt. Israel Stoughton, Lieut. Nathaniel Duncan, Ensign John Holman, 1636-7. 472 KING PHILIP S WAR. In the other towns, Hingham, Weymouth, etc., officers were not at this time chosen. SECOND REGIMENT. Col. John Haynes, Cambridge. Lieut. Col. Roger Harlakenden, 1636. CHARLESTOWN. Capt. Robert Sedgwick, 1636-7. NEWTOWNE. Capt. George Cooke, Lieut. William Spencer, Ensign Samuel Shepard, 1636. WATERTOWNE. Capt. William Jennison, 1636-7. CONCORD. Lieut. Simon Willard, 1636-7. DEDHAM. No officers mentioned. THIRD REGIMENT. Col. John Endecot, of Salem. Lieut. Col. John Winthrop, Jr., 1636. SAUGUS. Capt. Nathl. Turner, 1634; Lieut. Daniel Howe, Ensign Richard Walker, 1636-7. SALEM. Capt. Wm. Traske, Lieut. Richard Davenport, Ensign Thomas Reade, 1636-7. IPSWICH. Capt. Daniel Denison, 1636-7 ; John Whittingham, Lieut. ; Thomas Howlett, Ensign. NEWBURY. Capt. John Spencer, 1636-7; Lieut. Edward Woodman, May, 1637. In 1638 " The Military Company of the Massachusetts " was organized, and granted special encouragement by the Court. Robert Keayne was chosen Captain. This was the first indepen dent military company in Boston, and became an element of great influence. From the first it has been made up of picked men. It was a training school and authority in military art ; and membership in its ranks became a badge of honorable military service. This company became the celebrated " Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company," the oldest and most notable military organization now existing in America. A complete history of this company has been lately prepared with great care by Rev. Oliver A. Roberts. In the year 1644 the title " Colonel " was dropped, and " Major " became the title of the chief regimental officers. Serjeant Major General was the title of the chief military officer in the colony. Thomas Dudley, Esq., was the first chosen to that office, May 29, 1644. The officer was chosen from the assistants, and was a member of the General Court. In June, 1645, the choice of Majors of Regiments was left to the popular votes of each Regi ment. The title Major General soon took the place of the former, Serjeant being dropped. APPENDIX. 473 MAJOR GENERALS OF MASSACHUSETTS. Thomas Dudley, 1644- 45. John Endecott, 1645- 49. Edward Gibbons, 1649-52, and 1654- 55. Robert Sedgwick, 1652- 53. Daniel Denison, 1653- 54, 1655- 61, 1662- 63, and 1674-1681. Humphrey Atherton, 1661- 62. John Leverett, 1663-1673. Daniel Gookin, 1681-1686. The Colonial records are somewhat meagre and uncertain in relation to the organization of the local military companies through many years. About the time of the opening of Philip s War, there were regi ments, or parts of regiments, in each of the six counties. A roster of the officers of these regiments, as far as can be learned from the records, may be of inferest : Capt. 1st. James Oliver. 2d. Thomas Savage. 3d. Thomas Clarke. 4th. William Hudson. 5th. Daniel Henchman 6th. John Richards. 7th. Thomas Clarke, jr 8th. John Hull. Isaac Johnson. Hopestill Foster. Richard Brackett. Daniel Fisher. SUFFOLK REGIMENT. Major, Thomas Clarke. BOSTON COMPANIES. Lieut. Elisha Hutchinson. Benjamin Gillam. Thomas Lake. Nathaniel Reynolds. . Hugh Drury. Matthew Barnard. . Enoch Greenleaf . Theophilus Frary. ROXBURY. Samuel Ruggles. DORCHESTER. John Capen. BRAINTREE. Edmund Quincy. DEDHAM. William A very. Ensign. Ephraim Turner. Daniel Turell. Richard Woody. John Wing. Anthony Checkley. Penn Townsend. Benjamin Thirston. John Boles (?). Richard Hall. Robert Twelves. Nathaniel Stearns. MEDFIELD. George Barber, Capt. ; Henry Adams, Lieut. WEYMOUTH. John Holbrook, Lieut. HINGHAM. Joshua Hubbard, Lieut. SUFFOLK TROOP. William Davis, Captain. Jacob Elliot, Cornet. Thomas Brattle, Lieutenant. Timothy Dwight, Corporal. Thomas Swift, Quartermaster. 474 KING PHILIP S WAR. MIDDLESEX REGIMENT. Major Daniel Gookin. CAMBRIDGE. Capt. Lieut. Ensign. Daniel Gookin. James Trowbridge. Joseph Cooke ( ?) . CHARLESTOWN. Lawrence Hammond. Joshua Tidd. John Cutler. CONCORD. Simon Willard. Timothy Wheeler. William Busse. GROTON. James Parker. William Lakin. Nathaniel Lawrence. WOBURN. John Carter. William Johnson. James Converse. CHELMSFORD. Thomas Hinchman, Lieut. ; William Fletcher, Ensign. BILLERICA. Jonathan Danforth, Lieut. ; James Kidder, Ensign. MALDEN. John Wayte, Capt. LANCASTER. Henry Kerly, Lieut. READING. Jonathan Poole, Capt.; John Damon, Lieut. SUDBLTRY. Edmund Goodnow, Capt. ; Josiah Haynes, Lieut. WATERTOWN. Hugh Mason, Capt. ; Richard Beers, Lieut. MIDDLESEX TROOP. Thomas Prentice, Capt. John Wyman, Cornet. Edward Oakes, Lieut. Matthew Bridge, Quartermaster. ESSEX REGIMENT. Major Daniel Denisou. IPSWICH. Capt. Lieut. Ensign. Daniel Denisou. Samuel Appleton. Thomas Burnham. SALEM. 1st. Joseph Gardiner. John Price. John Higginson. 2d. John Corwin. Richard Leach. John Pickering. NEWBDRY. William Gerrish. John Pike. Benjamin Swett. ROWLEY. Samuel Brocklebank. Philip Nelson. John Johnson. APPENDIX. 475 MARBLEHEAD. Francis Johnson, Lieut. ; Richard Norman, Ensign. ANDOVER. Dudley Bradstreet, Capt. LYNN. John Fuller, Ensign. BEVERLY. Thomas Lathrop, Capt. FIRST ESSEX TROOP, SALEM AND LYNN. George Corwin, Capt. Thomas Putnam, Lieut. Walter Price, Cornet. SECOND ESSEX TROOP, IPSWICH AND NEWBERY. John Appleton, Capt. John Whipple, Cornet. An independent Cavalry Company called the " Three County Troop," raised at large in Suffolk, Middlesex, and Essex, was organized 1658/9. Edward Hutchinson, Capt., 1659, John Tuttle, Lieut., William Haisy, Cornet, 1665. HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT. Major, John Pynchon. SPRINGFIELD. Capt. Lieut. Ensign. Elizur Holyoke. Thomas Cooper. Benjamin Cooley. NORTHAMPTON. William Clarke, Lieut. ; David Wilton, Ensign. HADLEY. Samuel Smith, Lieut. ; and, in 1678, were commissioned, Aaron Cooke, Capt. ; Philip Smith, Lieut. ; and Joseph Kellog, Ensign. WESTFIELD. Samuel Loomis, Ensign. HATFIELD. Daniel Warner, Ensign. HAMPSHIRE TROOP. John Pynchon, Capt. William Allis, Lieut. Joseph Whiting, Cornet. George Colton, Quartermaster. (OLD) NORFOLK REGIMENT. Major, Robert Pike. PORTSMOUTH. Capt. Lieut. Ensign. Thomas Daniel. Walter Neale. Samuel Keys. HAVERHILL. Nathaniel Saltonstall. George Brown. James Pecker. GREAT ISLAND. Richard Cutts. Elias Stileman. Joachim Harvey. 476 KING PHILIP S WAR. HAMPTON. John Sanborn, Ensign. SALISBURY. Thomas Bradbury, Captain. NORFOLK TROOP. Robert Pike, Capt. William Vaughan, Lieut. YORK REGIMENT. Sergeant Major, Richard Walderne. Major, Brian Pendleton. KITTERY. Capt. Lieut. Ensign. Charles Frost. Roger Plaisted. John Gattinsley. SCARBOROUGH. Joshua Scottow. Andrew Alger. Richard Hunnewell, 1681. YORK. Job Alcocke, Lieut. ; Arthur Bragdon, Ensign. SACO. William Phillips, Capt. NEWICHEWANNOCK. John Wincoll, Capt. WELLS. John Littlefield, Lieut. ; Francis Littlefield, jr., Ensign. FALMOUTH (CASCO) . George Ingersol, Lieut. DEVONSHIRE MILITIA. Lieut. Thomas Gardiner, of Pemaquid, Commanding. SAGADAHOC. Thomas Humphreys, Sergt. ; James Middleton, Corp. DAMERILL COVE & HIPPOCRAS. John Bessell, Sergt. MONHEGIN. John Dolling, Sergt. CAPE NAWAGGEN. Robert Gamon, Sergt. The militia of the towns not mentioned in the above lists, were placed under local sergeants, as training-officers, and are not found upon the records of the Colony, from which I have gathered this roster, page by page, as did another gleaner from the same field, some twenty years ago, Gen. E. W. Peirce, of Freetown, Mass. I can testify to the fidelity of his labors. I find that the results of my own, made independently, agree generally with his. I have not attempted to record all the officers appointed in the colonies, but only such as were serving near the time of the two great wars. CAPT. MOSELY S VOLUNTEERS. The following list may be of interest, as showing the discrep ancy in spelling, when compared with the lists in chapter second of this volume. APPENDIX. 477 A List of Captain Samuell Mosselys Company taken at Dedham the 9th. Day of Xber 1675 : Samuel Mossely, Capt. Lieut. Peris Sauige Daniel Mathews ) c ^ James Johnson j * Dennis Siky, Clerke Edward Wesson Jno. Fuller Richard Barnam Samuel Fosdick Corporalls James Smith John Farmer Richard Brien Frauncis Earle Jno. Canterbery Samuel Kemble James Updeicke Richard Adams Jno. Bouckman Joseph Touchwill Thomas Region Jno. Yeates Jonathan Nicholls Jonathan Weals Peter Leane John Ramsye Edward Weaden Andrew Johnson Jno. Crosse Tymothye Arnane Benjemin Dayer Jno. Ayrson Jno. Dunbare Samuel Guild Samuel Veile Jonathan Freeman Jno. Plimpton William Blacke Jno. Willingstone Jno. Turner Tymothy Weals Bolthomy Flag Richard Gibson Thomas Warren William Blacke, Anthony Backer Jno. Rise Frauncis Siddall Jno. Sherman Jno. Cooper Jno. Leigh James Franklin William Phillips Mathew Thomas James Morgan Hugh Collohane Jeremias Stockes James Digenton Joshua Silverwood Thomas Bull William Beateman 1 Daniel McKennys and 1 Jno. Aruell Thomas Hackerbery Benjeman Allen Frauncis Bourgis Nicholas Greene William Good Jno. Cook Jno. Brandon Jno. Cousier Richard Hopkins Jno. Stebence From Maiden Thomas May James Chadwicke Jno. Winsleed Jno. Mudge Edmond Chamberline Jno. Rosse Jno. Puinder 2 James Wealsh Charlestowne men Hen: Swaine Thomas Dauis Samuell Leman William Burt Jno. Monsall Joseph Dawse Nathaniell Keane George Grimes Edward Walker Joseph Low Jno. Essery Jno. Shepard Jacob Cole Dauid Jones 3 Benj. Latrope jr. 3 Thos. Weals jr. 3 Jno. Trumball jr. Dedham Saml. Colborne John Day Robt. Weare Abra. Hartway Henry Ellitroop (Mass. Archives, vol. 67, p. 293.) THE ANCIENT MANUAL OF ARMS. I have not found any authority showing the manual of arms or military tactics in use at the time of the Pequod War ; but perhaps in that quaint old library of Myles Standish, in his vol ume of " Banff s Artillery," or that " parcell of old bookes of 1 both ran away with their arms 1 not apeare 9 not appears 478 KING PHILIP S WAR. divers subjects in quarto," mentioned in his inventory (1655), might have been found the manual from which were drawn the "regulations " of the early New England militia. From an old English treatise, quoted in " Grose s Antiquities," I find the following extracts : There-fore the souldier must accustom himself to bear a peece or a pike. If he bear a peece, he must first learn to hold the same : to accommodate his match between his two foremost fingers and his thumb, and to plant the great end on his breast with a gallant souldier-like grace ; and being ignorant, to the intent he may be more encouraged, let him acquaint himself first with the firing of the touch-powder in his panne, and so by degrees both to shoote of, to bow and bear up his body, and so consequently to attaine to the levell and practise of an assured and serviceable shot ; readily charge and with comely couch discharge, making choise at the same instant of his marke, with a quick and vigilant eye ; his flaske and touch-box must keep his powder, his purse and mouth his bullets. In skirmish, his left hand must hold his match and peece and the right-hand use the office of charging and discharging ... let him ever first load his peece with powder out of his flaske, then with her bullet, and last with annuring and touch- powder, foreseeing ever that the panne be cleare, the cover close, the touchhole wide, or else well-pro ined, etc. From the same work above quoted, in tables illustrated with quaint pictures, I find the following manual : 1. March with your rest in your hand. 2. March, with your Musket carry your rest. 3. Unshoulder your Musket. 4. Poise your Musket. 5. Join your rest to your Musket. 6. Take forth your Match. 7. Blow off your Coal. 8. Cock your Match. 9. Try your Match. 10. Guard blow and open your pan. 11. Present. 12. Give fire. 13. Dismount your Musket. 14. Uncock your Match. 15. Return your match. 16. Clear your pan. 17. Prime your pan. 18. Shut your pan. 19. Cast of your loose powder. 20. Blow of your loose powder. 21. Cast about your Musket. 22. Trail your rest. 23. Open your charge. 24. Charge your Musket. 25. Draw forth your scour ing stick. 26. Shorten your scouring stick. 27. Put in your Bullet & Ram home. 28. Withdraw your scouring stick. 29. Shorten your scouring stick. 30. Return your scouring stick. 31. Recover your Musket. 32. Poise your Musket and recover your rest. 33. Rest your Musket. 34. Draw out your Match. 35. Blow your Match. 36. Cock your Match. 37. Try your Match. 38. Guard your pan. 39. Present. 40. Give fire. 41. Come up to your Musket. 42. Return your Match. 43. Take up your rest. 44. Blow off your loose powder and cast about your Musket. 45. Trail your rest & open your charge. 46. Bring up your Musket. 47. Poise your Musket & recover your Rest. 48. Shoulder your Musket. Halberds and pikes had their proper manuals in this work, but were of little use in Indian warfare, and we hear nothing of them APPENDIX. 479 in active service. The above manual, if ever in use in the col onies, was superseded, some time before Philip s War, by Elton s " Compleat Body of the Art Military." Elton s formula differs slightly in language from the preceding, and has eight more commands, which relate to the putting on and taking off of accoutrements. Troopers were armed with a sword, and either two pistols or a carbine, to each man. After pikemen were discarded in active service, the soldiers were furnished with long knives, with handles to fit into the muzzles of their muskets, for close-quarter fighting ; and these were replaced by bayonets, named from the place of their first manufacture, Bayonne, in France ; these were at the first fitted into the muzzles of the guns. The regulation musket had a barrel four feet in length. In 1673 the Court ordered from England " five hundred new Snaphances or fire-lock Musketts, for the country s use." At the same time they ordered from Bilboa sixty cannon, or " great gunns," of the dimensions viz. : " twelve whole culverin, twelve demy culverin cutts, sixteen sakers, and twenty or thirty shott, proportionable for each gun." The cannon were mostly for coast defence, being useless in Indian warfare. CAPTIVES. The following accounts show the harsh custom of the times, and reveal a source of Colonial revenue not open to our country since that day. ACCOUNT OP CAPTIVES SOLD BY MASS. COLONY. August 24th, 1676. John Hull s Journal page 398. Captives Cr. By Sundry Acc p 8 Viz. . e. d. . e. d. Isaac Waldron for a Boy 3 00 00 Ephraim Savage for 2 girles . . . . . . 04 10 00 Samuel Shrimp ton, 4 Squawes, 3 girls, 2 infants . . . 30 00 00 ) 1 old man, 3 squawes & 2 for one returned by ( /n 1 o nn order 09 00 00 ( 4 1 man . ... 02 12 00 ) Samuel Lynd for 1 maid . . . . . . . 03 10 00 Thomas Smith, 1 girl and 2 men . . . . . . 09 10 00 10 Squawes, 8 papooses, & 1 man . . . 25 00 00 f , _ M nn 2 Lads, Viz. Pomham & Matoonas . . 07 00 00 > 1 Woman, 4 little children . . . . 05 1 2 00 480 KING PHILIP S WAR. Samuel Symons, Esq. For 1 Boy and Girl . . . 05 00 00 George Perkes 06 00 00 John Mors For 1 Girle . 02 00 00") For 2 Girles . 07 00 00 f- 12 00 00 For 1 Boy . 03 00 00 ) John Mann, for 1 Girle .... . 03 00 00 Thomas Davis, for 1 Boy . 03 00 00 Daniel Henchman, for 1 squawe & infant . . 02 10 00 Samuel Mosely, 1 Boy & Girle 13 Squawes & papooses wounded 1 sick . 06 00 00 ) . 20 00 00 ( 2b Timothy Batt, for 1 squawe . 02 15 00 Rawlings, 1 squawe 03 00 00 September 23, 1676. Thomas Smith for 41 (captives) . 82 00 00 Isaac Waldron for 1 .... . 02 00 00 Richard Middlecott for 6 . 10 00 00 James Meares "2 . 03 10 00 Samuel Apleton "3 . 04 00 00 John Buttolph " 1 . 01 15 00 William Gilbert " 1 . 02 00 00 George Sphere "1 . 02 00 00 "William Needham "1 . 00 05 00 Thomas Grant "5 . 08 01 00 David Waterhous "1 . - . . 02 00 00 James Whitcomb "13 . 14 15 00 John Turner "1 . 02 00 00 Ann Shepcutt "1 . 01 15 00 Richard Wharton "8 . 08 00 00 Rawlins "3 . 04 10 00 John Wait "4 . 04 10 00 Josiah Flynt "2 . . 03 15 00 Samuel Leach "2 .. . 02 00 00 Jarvis Ballard "2 . . . 02 00 00 James Meares "2 . . 02 08 00 John Mason "1 . 02 00 00 Benjamin Gibbs "8 . . 05 00 00 ADVANCE SUBSCRIBERS TO THIS VOLUME. [The names in this List are not indexed.] No. Name. Address. 1. JOHN WARD DEAN Boston, Mass. 2. NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY Boston, Mass. 3. CAPT. NATHAN APPLETON Boston, Mass. 4. CALEB DAVIS BRADLEE, D.D Brookline, Mass. 5. ROWLAND PELL, Secretary New York Society Colonial Wars New York City. 6. HON. J. P. BAXTER Portland, Me. 7. COL. IVERS PHILLIPS Boulder, Col. 8. HON. GARDINER G. HUBBARD .... Washington, D.C. 9. FREDERICK G. SWAN New York City. 10. GEORGE N. REYNOLDS Lancaster, Penn. 11. G. W. R. SCOTT, D.D Leominster, Mass. 12. G. A. CHURCHILL Boston, Mass. 13. ALBERT A. FOLSOM Brookline, Mass. 14. CHARLES M. GREEN, M.D Boston, Mass. 15. WILLIAM PRESCOTT GREENLAW .... Boston, Mass. 16. G. P. WINSHIP Providence, R.I. 17. HARRY YOUNG Brookline, Mass. 18. EDWARD S. HAYDEN Waterbury, Conn. 19. ELLERY B. CRANE Worcester, Mass. 20. WILLIAM S. HILLS New York City. 21. FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY Worcester, Mass. 22. HARVARD COLLEGE LIBRARY .... Cambridge, Mass. 23. YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY New Haven, Conn. 24. BOWDOIN COLLEGE LIBRARY .... Brunswick, Me. 25. C. W. GALLOUPE Boston, Mass. 26. WILLIAM B. TRASK Dorchester, Mass. 27. REV. GEORGE LEWIS South Berwick, Me. 28. THE BUFFALO LIBRARY Buffalo, N.Y. 29. ISAAC J. GREENWOOD New York City. 30. ED. E. AYER Chicago, 111. 31. FREDERICK L. GAY Brooklme, Mass. 32. EBEN PUTNAM . . . . _, . . . . Salem, Mass. 33. E. A. CUSHING. . . ." Milton, Mass. 34. WILLIAM HOLDEN Leominster, Mass. 35. W. WATTS SHERMAN New York City. 36. DR. M. ORDWAY DALY Dorchester, Mass. 482 KING PHILIP S WAR. No. Name. Address. 37. CHARLES SAMUEL WARD, Secretary Con necticut Society Colonial Wars . . . Bridgeport, Conn. 38. JOHN J. MAY Boston, Mass. 39. MEMORIAL LIBRARY Westbrook, Me. 40. SEYMOUR MORRIS, Secretary Illinois So ciety Colonial Wars Chicago, HI. 41. WALTER K. WATKINS, Secretary Massa chusetts Society Colonial Wars . . Boston, Mass. 42. MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ... St. Paul, Minn. 43. DR. FRANCIS E. ABBOT, Governor Mas sachusetts Society Colonial Wars . . Cambridge, Mass. 44. GEORGE T. TILDEN Milton, Mass. 45. T. LARKIN TURNER North Weymouth, Mass. 46. S. ARTHUR BENT Boston, Mass. 47. JOHN APPLETON WILSON Baltimore, Md. 48. NEW HAVEN COLONY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, New Haven, Conn. 49. ESSEX INSTITUTE LIBRARY Salem, Mass. 50. HENRY PRATT UPHAM St. Paul, Minn. 51. BOSTON ATHEN.EUM Boston, Mass. 52. FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY Watertown, Mass. 53. A. HOWARD CLARK, Smithsonian Insti tution Washington, D.C. 54. LONG ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY . . Brooklyn, N.Y. 55. A. H. QUINT, D.D Boston, Mass. 56. JOHN E. HUDSON Boston, Mass. 57. J. GRANVILLE LEACH Philadelphia, Pa. 58. GEORGE NORBURY MCKENZIE .... Baltimore, Md. 59. HENRY S. BOWRON Sing Sing, N.Y. 60. C. S. OLMSTED Chicago, 111. 61. E. E. SALISBURY New Haven, Conn. 62. H. STOCKBRIDGE, JR Baltimore, Md. 63. JEROME C. HOSMER Boston, Mass. 64. DANIEL C. DAGGETT Moline, 111. 65. FREDERICK W. BAILEY New Haven, Conn. 66. ORIN P. ALLEN Palmer, Mass. 67. E. I. GARFIELD Boston, Mass. 68. HENRY F. COE ......... Boston, Mass. 69. HENRY W. CUNNINGHAM Boston, Mass. 70. FRANK A. ALLEN Boston, Mass. 71. A. W. CURTIS Spencer, Mass. 72. EDWIN H. BUGBEE Putnam, Conn. 73. GEORGE F. T. BROOKS Chelsea, Mass. 74. GEORGE I. CARNEY Lowell, Mass. 75. JAMES HARLOW DALY, D.D.S. . . . Dorchester, Mass. 76. JAMES STURGIS BRYANT Hartford, Conn. 77. S. LORING KEITH Bridge water, Mass. 78. CHARLES P. BRITTON New York City. 79. CEPHAS BRAINERD New York City. 80. HORACE A. FOOTE New York City. 81. FREDERIC PERCIVAL ALLEN Rochester, N.Y. ADVANCE SUBSCRIBERS. 483 No. Name. Address. 82. PERCY BRYANT Buffalo, N.Y. 83. S. VICTOR CONSTANT New York City. 84. JAMES A. BENEDICT New York City. 85. JAMES F. SAVAGE Lowell, Mass. 86. WILLIAM GILBERT DAVIES New York City. 87. REV. HENRY F. JENKS Canton, Mass. 88. EDWARD U. GREENE Brooklyn, N. Y. 89. E. C. CONVERSE New York City. 90. MYRON S. DUDLEY Nantucket, Mass. 91. WILLIAM F. DRAPER Washington, D.C. 92. J. O. WETHERBEE Boston, Mass. 93. WILSON L. BALDWIN Stamford, Conn. 94. JAMES H. TOWNSEND New York City. 95. FREDERIC E. HYDE New York City. 96. E. FELLOWES JENKINS New York City. 97. REV. FREDERIC S. SILL Cohoes, N.Y. 98. R. L. BRACKETT New York City. 99. P. GILBERT THEBAUD New York City. 100. LYMAN RHODES New York City. 101. GEN. JAMES L. VARNUM New York City. 102. HENRY STANTON New York City. 103. WARHAM WHITNEY Rochester, N.Y. 104. CHARLES R. WILSON Buffalo, N.Y. 105. EDWARD G. MINER, JR Rochester, N.Y. 106. PIERREPONT EDWARDS Elizabeth, N. J. 107. DRAKE WHITNEY Niagara Falls, N.Y. 108. OTIS E. WELD Boston, Mass. 109. PERCY PARKER Lowell, Mass. 110. ARTHUR L. D WIGHT Pueblo, Col. 111. LEWIS HALL Chautauqua, N.Y. 112. EDWIN WATSON POND Walton, N.Y. 113. WILLIAM M. WHITNEY Albany, N.Y. 114. JAMES REYNOLD Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 115. ROBERT BOWNE SUCKLEY Rhinecliff, N.Y. 116. H. S. ROBBINS New York City. 117. HENRY K. AVERILL, JR Plattsburg, N.Y. 118. WILLIAM SQUIER HILL Bingharnton, N.Y. 119. HENRY COLVIN BREWSTER Washington, D.C. 120. GEORGE HALE NUTTING Boston, Mass. 121. DOUGLAS MERRITT Rhinebeck, N.Y. 122. HORACE W. TINKHAM Fall River, Mass. 123. LEWIS COLEMAN HALL New York City. 124. ALBERT Ross PARSONS ( Garden City, ( Long Island, N.Y. 125. DANIEL SANDERSON LAMSON .... Weston, Mass. 126. ELISHA S. SHAW j North Chelmsford, ( Mass. 127. CLEMENT S. HOUGHTON Boston, Mass. 128. WILLARD NYE, JR New Bedford, Mass. 129. H. G. STORY Brooklyn, N.Y. 130. FREDERICK C. MOSELEY Boston, Mass. 484 KING PHILIP S WAR. No. Name. Address. 131. FREDERICK M. STEARNS Boston, Mass. 132. ARCHIBALD ROGERS Hyde Park, N.Y. 133. Louis A. WOODBURY, M.D Groveland, Mass. 134. WILLIAM C. SWAIN Milwaukee, Wis. 135. GEORGE SAMUEL MARSH Chicago, HI. 136. JOHN S. BRAYTON Fall River, Mass 137. CAPT. GEORGE LEROY BROWN, U.S. Army, Kuoxville, Tenn. 138. LIEUT. ALFRED B. JACKSON, U.S. Army, Fort Robinson, Neb. 139. BROOKLINE PUBLIC LIBRARY .... Brookline, Mass. 140. MELVILLE M. BIGELOW Boston, Mass. 141. ROBERT THAXTER SWAN Dorchester, Mass. 142. THOMAS DOANE Charlestown, Mass. 143. DAVID BANKS, JR., Deputy Secretary New York Society Colonial Wars . New York City. 144. NATHAN H. DANIELS Boston, Mass. 145. A. C. ADAMS Boston, Mass. 146. J. F. D. GARFIELD Fitchburg, Mass. 147. WINCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY .... Winchester, Mass. 148. CHARLES LINCOLN PARKER Maiden, Mass. 149. LEVI L. WILLCUTT Boston, Mass. 150. H. A. STEARNS Pawtucket, R.I. 151. R. G. F. CANDAGE Brookline, Mass. 152. WALTER H. BRADISH Springfield, 111. 153. CAPT. C. S. ROBERTS, 17th U.S. Inf. . Columbus, O. 154. T. D. SALE Portland, Me. 155. WILLIAM H. WINSHIP Boston, Mass. 156. GEORGE W. FREEMAN Portland, Ore. 157. MAJOR E. S. HORTON . . ... Attleboro , Mass. 158. SCOTT JORDAN Chicago, 111. 159. ALBERT EUGENE SNOW Chicago, 111. 160. H. K. FLINT Milwaukee, Wis. 161. A. G. BULLOCK Worcester, Mass. 162. NEWELL B. WOODWORTH Syracuse, N.Y. 163. WELLINGTON POOL Wenham, Mass. 164. BYRON WESTON Dal ton, Mass. 165. JACOB W. MANNING Reading, Mass. 166-175. GEORGE E. LITTLEFIELD .... Boston, Mass. 176. HIRAM HOLBROOK ROSE Chicago, 111. 177. WALTER F. BROOKS Worcester, Mass. 178. MRS. MARTHA L. WEYMAN .... Fitchburg, Mass. 179. WILLIAM WALCOTT STRONG .... Kenosha, Wis. 180. WALTER CHANNING WYMAN .... Chicago, 111. 181. MINNISINK VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, Port Jervis, N.Y 182. G. P. PUTNAM S SONS New York City. 183. CLARE J. BODGE Leominster, Mass. 184. MARGARET W. BODGE Leominster, Mass. 185. J. TYLER STEVENS Lowell, Mass. 186. FRANK BASSETT TOBEY Chicago, 111. 187. HORATIO NELSON SPENCER St. Louis, Mo. 188. SELDEN P. SPENCER, Secretary Missouri Society Colonial Wars St. Louis, Mo. ADVANCE SUBSCRIBERS. 485 No. Name. Address. 189. THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OP PENNSYL VANIA Philadelphia, Penn. 190. LEONARD THOMPSON Woburn, Mass. 191. CONNECTICUT HISTORICAL SOCIETY . . . Hartford, Conn. 192. ALFRED J. CARR Baltimore, Md. 193. HENRY DEERING Deering, Me. 194. FRANCIS H. LEE Salem, Mass. 195. WOBURN PUBLIC LIBRARY Woburn, Mass. 196. A. J. C. SOWDEN Boston, Mass. 197. FITCHBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY Fitchburg, Mass. 198. TAUNTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Taunton, Mass. 199. THE MILLICENT LIBRARY Fairhaven, Mass. 200. H. H. HUNNEWELL Boston, Mass. 201. E. O. JAMESON Boston, Mass. 202. FRANCIS H. RICE { 203. NEWBURYPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY . . . Newburyport, Mass. 204. GEORGE MAY ELWOOD Rochester, N.Y. 205. MAJ. CHARLES H. WHIPPLE, U.S.A., Secretary Society Colonial Wars . . St. Paul, Minn. 206. SAMUEL B. WILLIAMS Rochester, N.Y. 207. G. S. GREENE, JR New York City. 208. W. J. MCKELVEY, Rochester Free Acad emy Library Rochester, N.Y. 209. MRS. JONATHAN R. BULLOCK .... Bristol, R.I. 210. ENOCH STAFFORD JOHNSON Lynn, Mass. 211. JOHN EDWARD HEATON New Haven, Conn. 212. MILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Milton, Mass. 213. JOHN EDWARD HEATON New Haven, Conn. 214. FREDERICK L. MERRICK Chicago, 111. 215. THOMAS LINCOLN CASEY Washington, D.C. 216. GEORGE B. KNAPP Boston, Mass. 217. EDWIN D. WADSWORTH Milton, Mass. 218. OLD COLONY HISTORICAL SOCIETY . . . Tauntou, Mass. 219. WENDELL P. GARRISON New York City. 220. IRA L. SANDERSON Sturgis, S. Dakota. 221. EVANSTON FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY . . . Evanston, 111. 222. W. TRACY EUSTIS Boston, Mass. 223. EDWIN C. JAMES New York City. 224. MRS. CHARLES E. INCHES Boston, Mass. 225. J. WILSON POUCHER Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 226. GEORGE RIPLEY Boston, Mass. 227. MRS. MOSES HALLETT Denver, Col. 228. CHARLES SUMNER PARSONS Boston, Mass. 229. DAVID H. BROWN j West Medford, ( Mass. 230. GEN. GEORGE A. FORD New Haven, Conn. 231. GEORGE HARLAN LEWIS New York City. 232. WILLIAM JACKSON Boston, Mass. 233. LIEUT. JAMES T. ANDERSON, U.S. Army . Columbus, O. 234. HORACE E. WARE Boston, Mass. 486 KING PHILIP S WAR. No. Name. Address. 235. Lucius B. WING Newark, Ohio. 236. JNO. MARSHALL BROWN Portland, Me. 237. DAVID B. FLINT Boston, Mass. 238. CHARLES W. PARKER Boston, Mass. 239. DOUGLAS NORVAL GREENE Syracuse, N.Y. 240. J. ADAMS BARTLETT Chelmsford, Mass. 241. AZEL AMES, M.D Chelsea, Mass. 242. WILLIAM L. KINGMAN Yonkers, N.Y. 243. HENRY A. OSBORN Chicago, 111. 244. JAMES N. ARNOLD Providence, R.I. 245. ALEXANDER B. CRANE New York City. 246. MRS. EMMELINE JOSLIN COLONY . . . Keene, N.H. 247. CHARLES A. DUCHARME Detroit, Mich. 248. JAMES A. JACKSON Dansville, N.Y. 249. LEICESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY Leicester, Mass. 250. MARIA ELIZABETH BARDWELL .... Springfield, Mass. 251. ELLIS B. USHER LaCrosse, Wis. 252. D. S. KELLOGG Plattsburg, N.Y. 253. ANDOVER MEMORIAL HALL LIBRARY . . Audover, Mass. 254. ERNEST R. BORDWELL Penn Yan, N.Y. 255. JEREMIAH RICHARDS New York City. 256. IDA BIGELOW PETERSON Waltham, Mass. 257. EDWARD E. SILL New Haven, Conn. 258. CHARLES S. RICHARDS New York City. 259. GILBERT RAY HAWES New York City. 260. MRS. VIRGINIUS NEWTON Richmond, Va. 261. CHARLES L. WOODWARD New York City. 262. WILLIAM STIGER RICHARDS New York City. 263. D. F. APPLETON Ipswich, Mass. 264. IPSWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY .... Ipswich, Mass. 265. LIBRARY OF WAR DEPARTMENT .... Washington, D.C. 266. SIMON DAVIS Boston, Mass. 267. JAMES PRENDERGAST FREE LIBRARY . . Jamestown, N.Y. 268. WILLIAM MESERVE JORDAN Boston, Mass. 269. F. APTHORP FOSTER Cambridge, Mass. 270. NEWBURGH FREE LIBRARY Newburgh, N.Y. 271. SOCIETY OF COLONIAL WARS .... Denver, Col. 272. CHARLES T. WITT East Boston. 273. JAMES M. DALY, D.D.S Dorchester, Mass. 274. FRANK ALLEN HUTCHINSON Lowell, Mass. 275. ALFRED S. MANSON Boston, Mass. 276. OLIVER B. STEBBINS Boston, Mass. 277. CHARLES F. HALL Boston, Mass. 278. GEORGE ERNEST BOWMAN Boston, Mass. 279. F. W. WHITCHER Boston, Mass. 280. DAVID B. FLETCHER Dorchester, Mass. 281. J. T. HOFFMASTER Galveston, Texas. 282. C. A. DORR, M.D So. Hingham, Mass. 283. EDWARD R. MILLER, M.D. . ... Leominster, Mass. 284. HENRY R. BROWN, M.D Leominster, Mass. 285. SAMUEL T. DOLE, ESQ So. Windham, Me. 286. ISAAC BASSETT CHOATE. A.B Boston, Mass. INDEX OF NAMES. [No extended analysis of the relations of names has been attempted in this Index. The dash, connecting two numbers, indicates that all pages, between the two, also contain the name.] A. Abbey, 154-157. Abbot, 100, 166, 167, 206, 372, 382, 421, 423, 437. Abde e, 365, 373. Abell, 444, 463. Abett (Abbot). Aboquacemoka, 304. Abram, 394. Acy, 82, 83, 413. Adams. 58, 71, 72, 74, r-a3, l A-123, 155, 157, 176, 207, 217, 239, 264,272, 273,281,284, 360, 362, 364, 367, 369, 370, 413, 414, 419, 422, 435, 437, 448, 473, 477. Adderton (Atherton) . Addington, 59, 60, 77, 78, 289, 316. Adis, 222. Ager (Alger). Ahaton.81,226,397,402. Ahmus, 180, 192. Albey, 86. Alcock, 365, 476. Alden, 407, 459. "Alderman," 39, 388. Aldis, 368. Aldrig, 93, 448. Aleworth, 471. Alexander, 24, 136, 250, 252, 254, 286, 377, 426, 451. Alger, ) 75, 81, 85, 100, Algar, i 118, 222, 265, 298, 326, 339, 357, 476. Alhort, 358, 370. Aliston, 52, 64. Allanson, 332. Allen, ) 64, 71, 75, 81, Allin, | 137, 166, 167, 177, 224, 225, 234, 241, 259,346,347,358,360, 366-368, 372, 413, 428, 431,439,450,458,463, 466-468, 477. Allerton, 1. Alley, 137, 138. Allice, ) 152, 247, 265, Allis, \ 475. Almie, 49. Alson, 93. Alsop, 255. Alvord (Alvard). Amie, 24. "Amos," 35, 348. Amsden, 52, 170, 171, 272,273,375,436,448. Anderson, 61-63, 115. Andrew, 296, 303. Andrews, 55, 82, 83, 100, 138, 167, 283, 363, 413, 424, 452, 461. Andros, 41, 43, 84, 158, 170, 200, 277, 319, 346, 455, 464. Angel, 51, 222, 368. Annawon, 39, 385, 388. Apequinash, 112. Appleton, j 23, 33, 68- Appelton, j 70, 79, 83, 116, 132, 134, 139, 140, 142-158, 174, 179, 181, 182,187,190,201,219, 258, 259, 266, 268, 282, 289, 413, 415, 436, 437, 474, 475, 480. Archer, 460. Ardway, 155, 157. Armes, 240, 250, 252, 423. Armstrong, 443, 445. Arnane, 477. Arnell, ) 52, 241, 259, Arnold, i 260, 261, 366, 431, 433, 477. Arnold (Arnell). Arnouson, ) C1 ,, Aronson, f 61 62 Artsell, 118, 357. Aruell (Arnell). Asee (Acy). Ashamaway, 166. Ashby, 155. Aehcraft,443, 444. Ashden, 336. Ashdowne, 240, 247, 250. Atherton, 21, 56, 58, 122, 245, 250, 252, 264, 281,368,437, 473. Atkeson, 260, 274. Atkins, 162, 170, 281, 368, 440, 452, 461. Atkinson, 171. Auger (Alger). Augustine, 133, 362. Austin, 63. Avery, 36, 383, 441, 442, 445, 446, 467, 468, 473. Avis, 240, 248, 452. Awashonks, 29, 462. Ayres, 109, 115, 116, 207, 346, 372, 432. Ayreson (Ireson). B. Babb, 59. Babbitt, 461. Babcock, ) 75, 94, 100, Badcock, i 202, 220, 222, 239, 364, 369, 444, 446. Babson, 240, 421. Bachelder, 114, 166, 167, 170-172, 276, 420, 423. Bacheler (Bachelder). Backaway, 176, 177. Backua (Backaway). Backus, 234. Bacon, 171, 225, 367, 368. Bagley, 447. Bagnell, 178. Bagwell, 450. Bailey, ) 58, 137, 138, Bayly, j 140,369,414, 415, 423, 428. Baker, | 64, 150, 162, Backer, ( 167, 170-172, 176,177, 197, 207,217, 222, 226, 231, 241, 250, 252, 265, 310, 313, 338, 359, 362, 367, 376, 413, 422, 427, 432, 439, 442, 445, 452, 477. Balch, 137, 138. Baldwin, 170, 286, 356, 374, 435, 436. Ball, 93, 250, 252, 274, 353, 360, 419, 435. Ballard, 82, 83, 86, 166, 167, 277, 358, 406, 422, 423, 480. Bancroft, 258, 359, 424. Barbeane, 172, 273, 358, 376. Barber, 13, 52, 176, 216, 250, 252, 338, 361, 450, 466, 473. Bardell, ) 241,247,250, Bardwell, |252,289,361. Barge, 332. Barker, 100, 166, 167, 183, 273, 289, 371, 372, 423, 439, 440, 462. Barlow, 429. Barnam, 64, 74, 83, 176, 428, 439, 477. Barnard, 94, 137, 171, 239, 248, 272-274, 356, 359, 418-420,432,473. Barnes, 161, 175, 176, 210, 211, 231, 457, 466. Barney, 232, 302. Barrell, 23, 240, 417, 422. Barrett, 51, 83, 93, 94, 121, 183, 184, 210, 241, 261, 264, 272, 276, 277, 286, 334, 339, 373, 374, 429, 437, 448, 468. Barren, 68, 273, 366, 375. Barrow, 386. Barsham, 137, 171. Barstow, 53, 279, 349, 355, 376. Bartholomew, 159. Bartlett, 157, 162, 236, 413, 414, 416, 468. Barton, 55, 363. Bashaba, 299. Basse, 162, 364, 367, 433, 447. Bassen, 334, 336. Bassett, 165, 166, 406, 407, 422. Bassly, 76. Batchelor (Bachelder). Bateman, 55, 71,72,122, 155, 170, 172, 240, 248, 273, 274, 279, 359, 376, 436, 477. Bates, 113, 114, 137, 138, 162, 236, 281, 360, 365, 368, 433. Bath, 167. Bathrick, 417, 448. Batt, 178, 241, 361, 480. Battle, 285, 368. Baxter, 81, 439. Bayard, 168. Bayleff, 139. Beach, ) 286, 358, 373, Beech, \ 419, 448. Beadle, 165, 222, 282, 363, 432. Beale, 161, 163, 285, 433. Beames (Bemish). Beamon, 122. Bean, 449. Beanes, 450. Bear, 355, 358. Beard, 184, 302, 452. Bearse, 439. Bearstow (Barstow). Beck, 100. Beckett, 277, 451. Bedford, 157, 340. Bedortha, 250, 252. Bedwell, 155. Beebe, 443, 446. Beers, 32, 47, 66, 115, 120, 121, 127-134, 139, 143, 210, 241, 245, 250, 252,266,272,286,376, 382, 419, 450, 474. Beetle (Beadle). Beffer, 100. Begalow,)170,171,272, Bigalo, | 286, 376, Bigelow, ) 418. Belcher, 75, 80, 81, 176, 177, 197, 198, 241, 266, 278,363,364, 367,417, 431. Belden (Belding). Belding, 250, 252, 254, 467, 468. Belinger, 166. Belins (Billings). Belknap, 306. Bell, 166, 372, 421, 427, 443, 461. 488 KING PHILIP S WAR. Bellingham,234,469. Bellows, 210, 211. Bemish, 176, 273, 360, 376,417,427. Bendy, 239. Benjamin, 2S6. Benner, 366. Bennett, 52, 73-75, 93, 137-139, 151, 156, 177, 178,181,182,207,247, 250, 252, 264, 285, 352, 368,409,432,443, 445, 446. Benson, 161, 163, 433. Bent, 210, 268. Bently, 51. Berbeane (Barbeane). Berbeck (Burbeck). Berd, 365. Bereman, 350. Beresford, 1 240, 248, Berrisford, j 338, 375. Bernard, 273. Berry, 283, 371, 415, 439, 451. Bersham, 272. Berstow (Barstow). Besbedge, 429. Bessell (Blssell). Bessey, 350, 429. Betell (Beetle). Betokom, 399. Bever, 241. Bevis, 177. Bewly, 241. Bezoon, 339. Bickford, 334, 335, 336. Bicknell, 248, 272, 279. Bickner, 240, 273, 431. Biddle, 457. Bigelow (Begalow). Bigford (Bickford). Bignall, 285. Bigsby, 155, 157, 424. Bigulah (Begalow). Bill, 100, 240, 361, 432, 443, 445, 446. Billings, 82, 83, 373, 435, 444, 445. Billington, 457. Bingly, 176, 177, 433. Birch, 56, 176, 177, 264, 355, 444, 446. Bird, 265. Bisco, 81, 278. Bishop, 52, 72, 126, 241, 259, 278,356,361,367, 368, 370, 371, 432, 449, 468. Bissell, 465, 467,468,476. Bixbe (Bigaby). Blachford, 466. Blacke, 71, 445, 477. Blackleach, 152. Blackman , 265, 325, 452. Blackmore, 456. " Black Sachem," 462. Blackston, 99. Blackwell.177,217,362. Blake, 71, 72, 156, 281, 350, 368, 370, 444,452. Blanchard, j 118, 154, Blanchcr, \ 2T3, 285, 286, 345, 357, 374, 430. Blanford, 224, 225. Blashaeld,166,167,423, 424. Blighe, 94. Blinco, 52, 82, 83, 100, 118, 357. Blincott (Blinco). Blish, 439. Bliss, 441, 443, 445, 463. Blockwell (Blackwell). Blood, 114, 373. Breck, 92. Bullie, 100, 273. Blumfleld, 466. Breed, j 86, 154, 157, Bullock, 138, 371, 421. Bobit (Babbitt). Breid, j 278, 283, 371, Bump, 349. Boden, 166, 339, 422. 406, 418, 420, 422. Bunce, 466. Bodkin, 55, 118, 285, Brensmead ( Brims- Bundy, 458. 357. mead). Bunker, 81, 85. Bodman, 56, 64, 100, 240, Brewer, 116, 224, 225. Burbeck, 52, 64, 65, 272, 373. Brewes, 224, 225. 264. Bodwell, 139, 413. Brewster, 457, 458, 467. Burch (Birch). Bogell, 177, 178. Brian, 71, 72, 477. Burdall, 272. Bolch (Balch). Briar, 155, 157, 413. Burdet, 470. Bolen, 172. Briarly, ) 154 , 57 16 - Burdue, 436. Boles (Bolls). Brearly, I 104 107 lt>0 Burford, 177. Bolls, 449, 473. Brick, 430. Burges, 51, 64, 100, 217, Boltwood, 250, 252. Bridge, 81,154,474. 222, 239, 259, 261, 274, Bond, 81, 249, 260, 265, Bridges, 100, 138, 139, 347, 362, 458, 477. 272, 346, 356, 365, 372, 157, 464. Burk, 224, 376. 376. Bridgham, 366. Burkback (Burbeck). Bonighten, 297. Brigden, 272, 273, 274, Burley, 449. Bonney, 440. 374, 375. Burnall, j , fi 040 Boone, 100. Briggs, 56, 177,241, 261, Burnell, [ 56> 240- Bordecot, 63. 434, 449. Burnam, 82, 83, 413, Bordman, 360, 458. Brigham, 210. 428, 474. Bosell, 414. Bright, 133, 171, 376, Burnap, 250, 252. Bosway, 240, 363. 418. Burnitt, 250. Boswell, 448. Brimsmead, 208, 210. Burr, 259, 466, 467. Bosworth, 161, 163, 222, Brine (Brian). Burrage, 334, 336, 337, 368, 427. Brinkford, 365. 339. Bottes, 302. Brinknoll (Brintnall). Burrell, 161, 162, 207, Boudage (Bowditch). Brintnall, 276, 277, 283. 260, 279, 371, 422, 433. Boudeu, 330, 334, 336. Brisantine (Brissen- Burridge (Burrage). Boulter, 176, 177, 449. den). Burroughs, ) 279, 337, Bourle, 74. Brissenden, J 56, 239, Burrows, i 349, 458. Bourne, 460, 461. Bridentine, ) 240,249, Burt, 74, 225, 347, 418, Boutell, 165, 424. 363. 477. Boutwell, 230. Brock, 166. Burton, 167, 241, 247, Bowden (Boden). Brocklebank, 35, 36, 250, 451. Bowditch, 133,211,319. 184, 201, 206, 207, 213, Busbee (Besbedge). Bowen, 159, 162, 163, 214, 216, 218, 220, 223, Bush, 82, 126, 172, 359, 183, 284, 285, 369, 426. 227, 228, 231, 413, 437, 361, 437, 448. Bowers, 373, 437. 474. Bushnell, 441-445. Bowes, 278. Brookin, 334, 336. Bushrodd, 241, 250, Bowman, 417, 419, 420. Brooks, 51, 64, 65, 81, 252. Bowser, 210. 83, 122, 150, 215, 277, Buss, 170, 172, 435, 474. i Boyd, 241, 356. 286, 290, 291, 376, 415, Butcher, 452. Boyes, 263. 436, 448, 452. Butler, 76, 140, 154, Boyle, 176, 391. Broughton, 217, 240, 156,166,177,207,376. Boylston, 81. 248, 302, 362. Butter, 274. Boynton, 140, 154, 156, Brown, 30, 31, 49, 51, Butterfield, 10. 157, 165, 207, 260, 297, 58, 64, 73, 81-83, 114, Buttolph, 480. 371, 413. 419, 424. 139, 145, 154-157, 167, Button, 136, 139. Bozorth (Bosworth). 170-172, 176-178, 195- Buttrick, 112, 155-157, Brabrook, 154, 157. 197, 207, 210, 224, 225, 231, 272, 435. Brackenbury, 239. 259, 260, 265, 272, 274, Byels, 423. Brackett, 199, 279, 314, 276, 277, 279, 283, 286, 473. 290, 292, 335, 336, 339, C. Bradbury, 416, 476. 360, 363, 370-372, 413, Cahan, 162, 362, 363. Bradell, 166. 415-417, 420, 423, 427, Cain, 222, 438. Bradford, 1, 4, 70, 153, 428, 435, 440, 448, 449, Cakebread, 365. 173, 179, 183, 190, 191, 451,459, 460,462,475. Oalder, 432. 196, 263,429,455,457, Branson, 466. Call, 286, 418. 459, 460, 461, 463, 464. Bryan, 207, 248, 261. Callen, 240. Bradshaw, 249, 250, 252, Bryant, 239, 240, 361, Callender, 234. 254, 272, 365, 373. 429, 439. Galley, 277. Bradstreet, ) 165, 316, Buck, 272, 452, 456, Callicott, 389. Broadstreet, J 371,469, 464. Cammock, 325. 475. Buckland, 464, 466. Canada, 1 53, 72, 93, Bragdon, 476. Buckley, 137, 138, 199, Cannede, \ 360. Bragg, 260. 202, 247, 367, 435. Cann, 55, 83, 176, 177, Braine, 221, 364. Bucknall, 118, 357. 347. Brance, 349. Bucknam, > 52, 58, 71, Canonchet, 28, 34-36, Brand, 444, 446. Buckman, \ 72, 114, 112, 123, 200, 203, 237, Brandon, 64, 71, 72, 74, 248, 477. 243, 349, 377, 379-384. 477. Buffingtog, 166, 427. Canonicus, 4,6,8,9,12, Brattle, 38, 65, 77, 79, Bugby, 55. 20, 181, 192, 203, 307, 88, 89, 123, 184, 261- Bulkeley, 103, 183. 381, 385. 264, 270, 417, 436, 464, Bull, 11, 13, 14, 51, 71- Cantelbury, 71, 72, 433, 473. 74, 82, 153, 162, 174, 477. Brattlebank (Brockle- 181, 193, 281, 339, 359, Canterberry (Cantel- bank). 360, 368, 376,407,433, berry). Bray, 138, 260, 310, 449. 465, 466, 468, 477. Cantrell, 92. Brayley, 100. Bullard, 53, 64, 82, 94, Capen, 452, 473. Bread (Breed). 170, 171, 274, 419. Card, 41, 311. Brearly (Briarly). Bulling, 364, 430. Carmon, 439. INDEX OF NAMES. 489 Carpenter, 180, 192, 376, 385-388, 427, 428, Colton,475. 204, 381, 426, 463. 457, 461, 462. Colver, 442, 444-446. Carr, 172, 260, 359. Churchill, 339, 345. Comstock, 444, 446. Carter, 81,137,172,286, Chute, 260, 413. Corny, 231. 375, 448, 450, 474. Claghorn,439. Conah, 281. Cartey, 449. Clap, 23, 250, 252, 281, Conant, ) 154, 167, 423, Carthew, 239. 350, 364, 439, 448, 452, Cunant, j 439, 447. Cartland, 371, 450. Clark, ) 1-3, 35, 56, 57, Conhill (Cunnell). Carver, 1, 455. Clarke, \ 64, 75, 81, Conkcascogau, ) -., Gary, 165, 166, 273, 279, 93, 100, 137, 149, 152, Conkganosco, \ 359, 374, 428. 157, 165, 167, 169, 177, Conney, 59. Casasinamon, 23, 383. 184, 207, 222, 233, 239, Convars, 172, 474. Case, / 79 T7fti7Q 248, 251, 252, 260, 263, Converse (Convars). Casey, | 72> 176 ~ 178 - 266, 273, 274, 281, 322, "Conway," 354. Cask, 283, 370. 326, 327, 343, 348, 358, Coockow (Cuckow). Castin, 211. 364, 369, 370, 413, 416, Cook, j 56, 58, 64, 81, Catapazat, 383. 423, 431, 438-440, 444, Coke, i 83, 85, 100, Cattlin, 240. 445, 449, 452, 457, 458, 124, 133, 152, 154, 157, Chadburne, 314. 461, 464, 466-468, 473, 207, 236, 240, 252, 260, Chadwell, 155, 157, 165, 475, 477. 264,272,279,289,292, 260, 371. Clarson,273, 358, 376. 340, 363, 372, 373, 419, Chadwick, 72, 74, 171, Clary, 273. 429, 440, 443, 445, 457, 272, 273, 376, 477. Cleares, 1 m m 458,467,472, 474,475, Chafe, 207. Cleere, j 177 > 178 477. Cham, 450. Cleaveland, 122, 272, Cooka (Cocks). Chamberlaine, 73, 74, 163,240, 251,252,259, 283, 286, 357, 358, 360, 376, 428. Cooley, 475. Coolidge, 85, 116, 286, 260,274,359, 361,365, Cleaves, ; , fiq , d * n 356, 376. 366, 368, 426, 429, 431, Cleeves, j 169> 231 450> Coomes, 165. 447, 477. Clement, 346, 372. Coones, 404. Charapine, 375. Clesson, 252. Cooper, 71, 72, 78, 118, Champlin, 334, 443, 444. Cleverly, 334, 335, 337. 120, 145, 283, 286, 357, Champnes, (Champ- Clifford, 156, 370. 371, 373, 475, 477. ney). Clinton, 310. Coplane, j 162 . Champney, 57, 83, 265, Cload, 338. Copeland, 1 10J > * M - 404, 417. Cloather, 240. Copp, 155, 165, 439. Chandler, 407, 408, 420, Cloies, 452. Coppin, 1. 425, 432, 434, 435, 438, Clothier, 261, 361, Corbett, 221, 240. 458. Clouch, 374. Corbin, 56, 162, 427. Chapin, 251, 252. Clough, 130, 176, 177, Corbitant, 4. Chaplin, 241. 248, 286, 360, 375, 457. Corly, 346, 372. Chapman, 51, 82, 83,100, Clow, 72, 240, 241. Cornberry, 130, 134. 138, 240, 273, 278, 283, Cluff (Clough). Cornelius, 195. 356, 368, 374, 468. Coalman, 139, 251, 252, Cornish, 132. Chappie, 240, 444, 445, 260, 261, 425. Cornwell, 466. 452, 466. Coard, 86, 265. Corser, 71,339,347,414, Chard, 239, 240, 361. Coarser (Corser). 477. Charles, 443, 446. Coates, 240, 261, 361, Corwin, 79, 83,153,291, Charles II., 391. 371. 318, 372, 474, 475. Chase, 154, 157, 249, Cobbet, 7, 40, 240. Cory, 419. 251, 252, 254, 413, 439, Cobleigh, 196. Cotton, 178, 190. 458. Cock, 92, 166, 332, 337. Cottrell, 443, 445. Cheberrina, 310. CockB, 166, 167. Couch, 72, 75, 161, 176, Checkley, 325, 473. Coddington, 87, 122, 177, 265, 279. Cheek, 420. 360. Counter, 166, 372. Cheekanoe, 389. Codman, 448. Cousens, 122, 272. Cheesebro, 443, 445. Codner, 166. Cousier (Corser). Cheevers, ( 58, 100, 134, Coffin, 136,139,294,302, Cowdrey, 448. Chevers, | 207, 211, 316, 317, 413, 415. Cowell, (36, 72, 161, 217, 239, 248, 264, 360, Cogswell, 413. Cowle, ( 176,177,225, 362, 368, 373, 417, 428. Cohon (Cahan). 226, 228-231, 292, 339, Chenary, 131, 132. Cohone, 56, 452. 452. Cheney, ) 56 162 ,, Coker, 52, 318. Cowen, 349. Cheyney, \ 5b 1( "> 41d Colbourne, | 72, 75, 108, Coy, 108, 115. Chesly, 296. Coleburn, j 113, 368, Coytmore, 261. Chessom, 336, 337. 433, 448, 477. Crackbone, 131-133,373. Chester, 83, 467, 468. Colbron, 366. Craford, 138, 452. Chickering, 289. Colcord, 278, 344, 370. Crafts, > ,. 2S , Child, 131-133, 161, 282, Colcut, 413. Craft, J 137 > 281 - 283, 376, 451. Cole, ) 73, 74, 100, 118, Craece ) Childs, 350, 426, 439. Coole, J 137, 138, 157, CrailY } 272 365 373 - Chittenden, 349. 161, 165, 166, 218, 357, Craig (Cragge). Chrisp, 71,122, 177,272, 363, 364, 418, 439, 458, Crane, 162, 163, 224, 359, 360. 459, 477. 225, 241, 428, 452. Christian, 93. Coleby, 249, 251, 252. Crassell (Croswell). Chub, 58, 240, 259, 261, Coleman (Coalman). Cray, 52, 64. 361, 370. Coldham, 282. Creeke, 166, 239, 248, Chubbuck, 382. Colfax, 247, 251. 291, 450. Church, 28, 29, 39, 48, Coll (Cole). Crescey, 414. 52, 65, 73, 75-77, 80, Coller, 448. Creswell (Croswell). 84, 91, 164, 179, 180- Collins, 149, 260, 278, Crispe (Chrispe). 182, 186, 188, 191, 196, 290, 291, 336, 406, 422. Critchett, 176, 177. 198, 204, 247, 251, 253, Collohane (Galloway). Crocker, 421, 429, 439- 256, 264, 273, 360, 374, Collohue (Galloway). 441, 458. Cromwel, \ 118, 240, Crumwell, \ 272, 296, 357, 374, 391. Crooke, 176. Crosby, 83, 85, 94, 114, 364. Cross , 52, 64, 65, 71, 93, 260, 310, 371, 413, 416, 443, 444, 477. Croswell, 85, 374. Crouch, 118, 272, 357, 358, 374. Crouter, 240. Crow, 247, 251, 252. Crowell, 439. Crowfoot, 251, 252. Crumb, 443, 445. Crumpton,137, 138. Cuckow, 285, 368. Cudworth, 27, 28, 30, 48, 65, 194, 195, 196, 455, 459, 460, 462. Culacut, 17. Cullick.466. Gulliver (Gulliver). Cummings, 157, 330, 331, 336, 339, 437. Cummins, 157. Cunant (Conant). Cunnaball, > 239, 248, Cunneball, i 251, 252. Cunnell, 338. Currier, 413. Curtis, 29, 30, 54, 55, 81, 86, 94, 97, 104- 107, 109, 111, 113-116, 130, 167, 195, 224, 225, 369, 398, 421, 424, 451, 467, 468. Curwin (Corwin). Cushawashett, 23. Gushing, 363. Cushman, 4. Cuthbert, 458. Cutler, 58, 118, 127, 155, 170, 172,184,270, 272, 273, 285, 286, 357, 360, 368, 374, 376, 418, 431, 436, 474. Cutshamakin, 8, 9, 10. Outts (294,309,475. OUllo, ) Cutter, 154, 155, 157, 171, 417. Cuttin, 84, 127,171,273, 376, 417-419, 451. D. Daggett, 427, 463. Dalton, 374. Dalvine, 221. Daman, ) 172, 273, Dammon, ] 358, 360, 375, 406, 407, 464, 474. Damport (Davenport). Dana, 272. Dane, 155, 360, 412, 414. Dauforth, 88, 124, 162, 169, 193, 266, 301, 316, 352, 400, 474. Daniel, 52, 93, 304, 306, 307, 309, 364, 369, 475. Danielson, 444, 445. Darby, 338, 420. Darling, 358. Dart, 444, 445. Davenport, 8, 17, 18, 52, 55, 70, 152, 153, 161- 163, 168-172, 174, 182, 183, 185, 187. 190, 191, 265, 278, 365, 369, 431, 432, 435-437, 472. Dason, 248. David, 209. 490 KING PHILIP S WAK. Davidson, 211, 217, 362. Davis, > 14, 21, 23, 51, Daveis, j 72, 76, 79, 83, 102, 109, 112, 114, 117, 121, 138, 140, 154, 155,157, 167,177,201, 217, 239, 240, 248, 273, 274, 281, 285, 297, 298, 314, 346, 347, 355-358, 362, 374, 406, 414, 415, 418, 420, 422, 423, 435, 439, 449, 450, 452, 466, 473, 477, 480. Dawby, 274. Dawes, 64, 155, 241, 361, 431, 477. Dawson, 239. Day, 72, 75, 207, 260, 358, 368, 370, 422, 430, 477. Dayer (Dyer). Dean, 64, 81, 154, 157, 221, 260, 282, 309, 433, 435. Deares, 72, 371. DeBeck, 62. Decro, 64, 177, 178. Deers (Deares). Dees, 166. Delamore, 310. Deland, 421. Delanoy, 457. Delaway, 82. Dell, 272. Dellow, 283, 371. Demorell, 448. Dennis, 154, 217, 341, 362, 370, 451. Dennison, j 36, 45, 50, Denison, \ 66,76,89, 90, 93, 97, 101, 138, 156, 157, 179, 207, 213, 214, 218, 271, 281, 296, 301, 303, 320, 383, 395, 424,442, 443,445,446, 450, 467, 472-474. Dereing, 56. Derrick, ) 155, 157, DeReeke, \ 207. Despaw, 450. Dethsidg, 260. Deverick, 290. Dew (Due). Dewin, 404, 448. Dewolf , 443, 444, 446. Dexter.126,175,375,424. Dichetto, 51,71, 74,477. Dickenden (Dichetto). Dickerman, 450. Dickerson (Dickinson). Diekeson, 252, 286, 373. Dickinson, 53, 130, 131, 132,245, 247,251,252, 294, 451. Digenton (Dichetto). Digerson (Dickinson). Dike, 450. Dill, 171, 274. Dimmock, 426, 456. Dindy, 239. Dinely, 81. Dinsdell, 176, 177, 431. Dinwick, 130. Disborough, 466. Divall, 121, 353. Dix, 450. Dixy, 92. Doan, 439, 440. Dodds, 406. Dodge, 82, 83, 136, 138, 155, 283, 291, 370, 371, 423, 424. Dodson, 349. Doggett (Daggett). Dole, 206, 360, 413, 415. Dolhof, 449. Dolling, 476. Dolliver, 177. Domton, 360. Dony, 304. Dorr, 432. Doten, 1. Doublet, 57, 354, 403. Doud, 253. Douener (Dovener). Douglace (Douglis). Douglis, 177,443,445. Dourell, 361, 372, 414. Douse, { 72, 73, 100, Dowse,? 171,272,286, 356, 374, 375, 418. Dovener, 438, 439. Dow, 155-157, 165, 414. Dowgin, 286, 373. Downing, 164,241,261, 440. Downes, 154, 155, 157, 414, 452. Drake, 149, 156, 173, 186, 230, 333, 364, 370, 452. Draper, 56. Drew, ) 52, 176, 177, Drue, 1 247, 251. Drinker, 101, 232, 233, 239, 240, 248. Driver, 165,167,406,422. Drury, 64,170,183,473. Druse, 80, 81. Dublet (Doublet). Ducker, 310. Duckworth, 118, 240, 338, 357, 374. Dudley, 86, 91,114, 170, 179-182, 186, 191-194, 198, 199, 254, 360, 365, 432, 449, 469, 471-473. Due, 86, 137, 138. Duen, 260. Duerell, 240. Dugland, 161, 162, 163. Dumbleton, 150. Dummer, 416. Dunbar, 71,75,368,477. Duncan, ) 241, 247, 249, Dunkin, j 251, 256, 439, 471. Dunham, 426. Dunklins, 290, 374, 448. Dunnage, 118, 130, 357. Dunnell, 360. Dunning, 52, 55, 222, 240, 363. Dunster, 119, 216, 259, 361, 447. Dunton, 114, 260, 274. Dunwich (Dunnage). Dure, 100. Durston, 346, 371. Dutch, 139, 155. Duty, 260. Duy (Due). Dwelley, 464. Dwight, 254, 264, 265, 279, 368, 473. Dyer, 71, 72, 347, 364, 431, 466, 477. Dymon, 170. E. Eames, j 58, 81, 82, 83, Ernes, j 100,244,283, 349, 371, 373, 376, 436. Earle, 75, 197, 236, 374, 477. East, 72, 176, 177, 366. Eastman, 346, 358, 372, 414. Eaton, 154, 155, 157, 260, 272, 276, 277, 283, 370. Eatow, 17. Ebitt, 64. Eborne, 259. Edes, 286, 374. Edgecombe, 333, 336, 339. Edgerton, 51, 274. Edmands, i 58, 82, 83, Edmonds, J 85, 286, Edmunds, ) 348, 349, 375,406,422,450. Edson, 280, 428. Edwards, 251, 252, 449, 467. Eggleston, 130, 132, 466. Eldridge, 73, 180, 440. Elgar, 247, 251. Eliot, | 25, 52, 56, 82, Ellitt, i 83, 91, 94, 175, 177, 207, 208, 239, 241, 248, 260, 262, 273, 307,336, 355, 358,365, 374,376,1389-391, 393- 396, 398-400, 402, 443, 445, 448, 473. Elkin, 177, 293, 334- 336, 448. Ellenwood, 423,447. Ellenworth, 281. Ellery, 154, 156, 157, 422. Ellingham, 439. Ellis, 289, 357, 363, 366, 367, 456. Ellitroop, 477. Ellitt (Eliot). Elsley, 414. Eisruore, 260. Elson, 337. Elton, 46, 479. Elwell, 421, 457. Emerson, 157, 414, 449. Emery, t 56, 155, 156, Emory, \ 157, 207, 371, 414, 415. Emmett,371. Eraons, 138, 157, 165, 176, 177, 414. Emsden (Amsden). Endecott, ) 8, 75, 168, Endicot, J 285,469,472, 473. Engersell (Ingersoll). English, 1. Engollsbee, 118, 285, 338, 357. Ensign, 349. Essery, 52, 72, 356, 374, 477. Estey, 451. Estman (Eastman). Evans, 81,221,222,367, 422, 434. Everard, 142. Everett, 55, 138, 141. Ewoutse, 92. Eyres, 64, 108, 355. F. Fairbanks, 81, 100, 118, 178, 278, 353, 369, 448. Fairfax, 465. Fairweather, 252. Falkner, 285, 359, 367, 368, 382. Fanning, 443, 445, 446 Fantom, 207. Farah (Farrar). Farlow, 108, 113, 232. Farly, 113. Farmer, 72, 74,273,373, 477. Farnell (Furnell). Farnham, 232. Farnsworth, 121, 436. Farr, 170, 172, 422. Farrar, 137, 138, 278, 290, 352, 353, 435, 450. Farrington, 165, 167, 285, 368, 406, 422. Farrow, 422. Fassett, 436. Fausee, 157. Fawkner (Falkner) . Faxton, 163. Fay, 210, 211, 431. Felix, 81, 395. Fellows, 85, 126, 130, 207, 283, 370, 413, 414, 423, 467. Felt, 133, 138, 139, 321. Felton, 421, 439. Fenner, j 161, 162, 202, Fenno, \ 203,204,369. Feres, 281, 286. Ferker, 166, 371. Fertnan, 154, 217, 362. Ferniside, 222. Ferryman, 167, 447. Ficket, 334. Field, 137,251,252,282, 285, 466. Fielder, 72,177,221. Fifield, 286, 374. Figg, 100, 217, 273, 362. Finch, 248. Firman, 157. Fish, 355, 442, 446. Fisher, 139, 201, 240, 285, 357, 358, 361, 368, 375, 473. Fiske, 51, 52, 103, 109, 113, 121, 241, 260, 273, 286, 311, 312, 314, 346, 356, 371, 376, 437. Fitch, 90, 114, 156, 184, 202, 258, 260, 355, 370, 392, 428, 431, 442, 445, 463-465, 467, 468. Fitts, 157, 415, 423. Fitz, 350. Flagg, | 71, 155, 157, Flegge, i 171,352,419, 426, 435, 436, 477. Flanders, 250, 253, 260. Fletcher, 114, 121, 122, 360, 474. Flint, ( 83, 165, 166, 167, Flynt, i 421, 480. Floyd, 58, 292, 375. Foalsom, t ,, q Folsom, I 449 Fobes (Forbs). Fogg, 449. Follen, 439. Foot, 103, 250, 253. Forbs, 64, 72, 176, 178, 350, 441-444. Ford, 51, 86, 154, 157, 201, 207, 221, 310, 423. Foresight (Forsith). Forest, 76, 176, 177, 241, 361. Forgley (Frogly). Forsith, 75, 176, 177, 241, 363. Fosdick, (72, 74, 279, Fosdike, J 286, 477. Foskett, 272, 418. Fossey (Faussee). INDEX OF NAMES. 491 Foster, ) 64, 114, 121, Gattlnsley, 476. Gorham, 70, 153, 183, Hagar, 171, 360, 418. Forster, ] 154, 155, Gawen, 155. 191, 193, 196, 287, 288, Haiden (Hayden) . 157, 240, 247, 251, 260, Gay, 72, 368, 433. 438-441, 459, 462, 463. Haies (Hayes). 264, 272, 285, 358, 360, Geartield (Garfield). Gorney, 281. Haines, 17, 36, 223-225, 414, 425, 430, 431, 440, Gefford (Jefford). Gorton, 20. 229-231,464,465,469, 458, 473. Gellins, 415. Gorum (Gorham). 472, 474. Fowle, 81, 85, 100, 265, Gemmison (Jameson). Gosse, 363, 409. Hale, 172, 256, 413, 415, 286, 374, 413, 414, 416, Gendal, 313, 333, 335. Goswell, 56. 423,458 466. 421. Genery (Chenery). Gott, 450. Hales, 466. Fowler, 61, 62, 241, 247, Gennings (Jennings). Gould, 83, 114, 232-234, Halford, 360, 364. 250,310,414,423,468. George, 232, 277, 357, 258, 276. Hall, 51, 52, 156, 170, Fowlsham, 292. 358, 375, 401, 414. Gourdin, 158, 165, 166, 178, 257, 259-261, 264, Fox, 443, 445. Gepson, 363. 414. 266, 273, 289, 364, 368, Foxwell, 297, 326, 329- Gerrin, 247, 250. Gowen, 126, 156, 157. 369, 376, 419, 426, 439, 334, 458. Gerrish, 65, 100, 293, Grafton, 134. 443, 445, 448, 458, 473. Frail, 166. 294, 412, 415, 474. Granger, 150. Hallitt, 439. Francis, 55, 240, 241, Gery, ( 83, 265, 277, Grant, 61, 62, 81, 83, 85, Halloway (Holloway). 264, 274, 368. Geery, j 437. 162, 264, 419, 451, 480. Ham, 317. Franklin, 58, 71, 72, 264, Getchell (Gatchell). Grary (Gery) Hamblin, > 75, 239, 338, 347, 368, 477. Gibbons, 8,22,471,473. Graves, 73, 99, 112, 114, Hamlin, \ 356, 367, Frary, 91, 92, 137, 473. Gibbs, 170, 172, 217, 225, 116, 117, 152, 165, 167, 439. Frazer, 414. 350, 362, 402, 419, 440, 225, 242, 244, 260, 358, Hammon, 366, 367, 369, Freake, 60, 61. 480. 360, 371, 373, 406, 419, 451. Freeman, 71, 72, 225, Gibson, 51, 58, 72, 81, 422, 468. Hammond, 80,272, 286, 264, 366, 368, 428, 440, 85, 272, 286, 339, 373, Gray, 56, 165, 166, 222, 374, 405, 474. 457, 477. 477. 241, 277, 285, 439, 440, Hams (Hands). French, 108, 113, 155, Giddings, 86, 207, 283, 441. Hanbury, 459. 157,217,259,355,358, 414. Greeland (Greenland). Hanchat, 172, 278, 363. 362, 443, 445. Gidney, 371. Greely, 346, 372. Hancock, 122, 154, 285, Frenchman, 64. Gilbert, 75, 76, 177,241, Green, 64, 71, 85, 111, 363, 367. Friend, 136, 175, 310, 265, 291, 449, 467, 480. 114, 126, 165, 166, 266, Handmore, 428. 365. Gilford, 222, 281, 368. 274, 276, 277, 286, 342, Hands, 64, 75, 100, 221, Frink, 441, 442, 444. Gill, 80, 81, 222, 273, 360, 373-376, 448, 459, 360, 432. Frisbie, 443, 444. 360, 368, 433. 477. Hannan, 431. Frogly, 241, 359, 360. Gillam, 75, 97, 100, 101, Greenfield, 458. Hansett, ) 17R ,00 Frost, 41, 85, 254, 271, 197, 292, 473. Greenland, 58, 83, 265, Hanshett, \ 176 363 274, 286, 290, 302, 303, Gillett, 1 137, 247, 250, 276, 435. Hanson, 239. 306, 311, 313, 314, 320, Jellet, i 252,253,444, Greenleaf, 52, 139, 154, Hapgood, 108, 113, 225, 322, 360, 373, 447, 476. 445, 466. 155, 165, 184, 413, 414, 436, 437. Frothingham, 272, 286, Oilman, 176-178, 239, 473. Haradine, 165. 290. 248, 291, 292, 449. Gregory, 338. Hardin, 52, 440, 471. Fry, 166, 167, 372, 422. Gleason, 122, 170, 171, Grew, 439. Barker, 281, 457. Fuller, 27, 28,30,48, 71, 250, 252, 253, 272, 274, Gridley, 55,278,431,466. Harlakenden, 472. 74, 133, 183, 251, 252, 365, 373, 417. Griffeth, 360. Harmon, 337, 424, 458. 254, 259, 260, 278, 310, Glide, 118, 240, 357. Griffin, 85, 240, 250, Harradaway, 421. 347, 348, 350, 366, 371, Glover, 142, 145. 253, 273, 286, 360, 361, Harrage, 440. 414, 421, 439, 448, 455, Gloyd, 421. 363, 364, 369, 374, 418, Harriman, 136, 138, 416. 456, 459, 462, 475, 477. Goad, ) 1fi n inn 451. Harrington, 55, 127, Furbush, 72. Goard, j 162 > 432 Griggs, 56, 431, 438, 452. 133, 167, 176, 177, 363, Furnell, 137, 138. Goarton, 457. Grimes, 72, 477. 422, 452. Gobely, ( 81-83,114,277, Grind, 418. Harris, 71, 78, 94, 159, Goble, \ 360, 373. Griswold, 443, 445, 468. 176,177,204,241,273, G. Goddard, 286, 375. Gromwell (Cromwell). 282, 357, 358, 374, 375, Gage, 100, 350, 360, 416, Goddin (Gourdin). Gross, 64, 366, 368, 369, 423, 432, 450, 468. 439. Godfrey, 156, 363, 415. 449, 452, 478. Harrison, 75, 247, 250, Gaines, 122, 353, 412, Goff, 75, 84, 100, 286, Grotis, 355. 253, 363. 416. 360, 363, 366, 373, 406. Grout, 82, 83, 224, 225, Hart, 83, 85, 167, 292, Gale, 273, 356. Gold, 64, 165, 166, 350, 418. 466. Gallop, 7, 8, 17, 70, 93, 421, 439, 467. Groveling, 52. Hartford, 240. 183, 191, 239, 248, 249, Golding, 387, 462. Grover, 240, 250, 253, Hartshorne, 240, 259, 273,441,443,444,446. Gollihu (Galloway). 264, 361, 366, 451. 260, 261, 274, 346, 372, Galloway, 71, 72, 241, Good, 55, 477. Groves, 58, 241. 426, 452. 414, 477. Goodale, 192, 194, 197, Grow, 207, 370. Hartway, 477. Galusha, 365, 375. 198, 232. Guild, I 71, 72, 75, 157, Hartwell, 112, 278, 435, Gamidg, 155. Goodell, 103. Guile, \ 366, 368, 477. 448. Gamlin, 55. Goodhue, 134. Gullifer, ) 81, 154-156, Harvey, 64, 155, 156, Gamon, 476. Goodman, 244. Gullever, \ 364, 369. 157, 414, 475. Gannett, 100. Goodnow, 224, 225,227, Gully, 51. Harwood, 52, 176, 250, Gardener, 9-11, 16, 314. 230, 474. Gunny, 195, 196. 253, 448. Gardiner, ) 55, 70, 128, Goodrich, 468. Gunrashit, 354. Hascall, 83, 86, 93, 260, Gardner, \ 139, 140, Goodspeed, 439, 441. Guppy, 82, 83. 283, 310, 370. 152, 153, 162-167, 174, Goodwin, 273, 286, 375, Gurdon (Gourdin). Hascott, ( fi o 1QT 178, 183, 186, 187, 190, 412, 418, 432. Gurnet, 433. Basket, \ 8<}> la 191,193,197,231,260, Gookin, 47, 52, 63, 67, Gurney, 162, 431. Basey, ( 79, 153, 161, 318-320, 343, 421, 433, 77, 84, 94, 95, 103, 124, Gustin (Augustine). Basic, | 258, 262, 264, 436, 437, 474, 476. 159, 175, 201, 207, 208, Guylie (Guild). 276, 277, 432, 452, 475. Gardnett, 161. 212, 219, 220, 228-231, Hastings, 52, 85, 133, Garfield, ) 58, 118, 172, 268, 284, 299, 307, 309, H. 137, 154, 171, 272, 366, Garfell, j 357,376. 310, 319, 345, 352, 354, Hackburn, 289. 376. Garrett, 23, 464. 373, 376, 392-396, 398- Hackerberry ^Ock- Hatch, 424, 434, 45S, Gary (Gery). 400, 402, 404, 405, 462, erby). 464. Gatchell, 131, 132, 260, 473, 474. Hadley, 414. Hathaway, 52, 222, 427, 421. Gool (Gould). Hadlock, 221, 247, 250, 428, 439. Gates, 161, 405, 417, 436. Goose, 363. 281, 355, 361, 366, 373. Hatherly, 459. 492 KING PHILIP S WAR. Hathorne, ) 39, 40, Hickson, 140, 241, 259. Horsington, 221. Hurley, 221. Hawthorne, ) 133, 164- Hidden, 413. Hortman, 71. Husband, 165, 167. 166. 168, 183, 271, 277, Hide, 114, 118, 339, 357, Horton, 64, 468. Hutchins, 165, 207, 346, 305, 306, 310, 318-324, 373. Hosford, 467, 468. 372, 423. 335,337, 371,406. Hides, 172, 448. Hoskins, 463, 468. Hutchinson, 29, 30, 48, Haughton, 170, 368. Higgins, 439, 440. Hosley, 195, 437. 66, 79, 82, 83, 87, 88, Haven, 207, 422, 450. Higginson, 8, 371, 474. Hosmer, 114, 231. 90, 93, 103, 106-109, Hawes, 58, 122, 155, Higinbottom, 279. Hough, 444-446. 111-114, 123, 173, 174, 170, 231, 338, 360, Hildred, 122. Houghton, 409, 436, 191, 193, 276,306, 340, 366, 368, 452. Hildrick, 448. 437, 438. 395, 414, 421, 424, 469, Hawkes, 137, 250, 253, Hill, 58, 85,96,114,162, Houldrige, 449. 473, 475. 406. 195, 207, 278, 340, 360, Hoult, 86, 444, 445. Hutten, 167, 423, 451. Hawkins, 1 66, 72, 74, 363, 367, 373, 412, 414, Houlton (Holton). Hogkins, > 85,94,155, 428, 458, 465. Hounsell, 3o4, 336, 339. 265, 299, 300,316,347, Hillard, 344. Hounslow, 337. . 359, 418, 434. Hills, 51, 466. House, 176, 363. Ide, 427, 463. Hawley, 226, 231, 432. Hay, 417. Hilman, 64, 72. Hilton, 285. Hovey, 113, 272, 361, 415, 426. Illery (Ellery). Ilsley, 154, 156, 157. Hayden, 81, 83, 94, 264, 443, 445, 466-468. Hincher, 52, 121, 365, 432. How, 52, 58, 170, 172, 208, 210, 211, 225, 281, Ince, 466. Indian, 71, 81, 452. Hayes, 118, 152, 154, 155, 157, 165, 357, 374. Hinchman ( Hench man). 343, 373, 374, 435, 472. Howard, 81, 83, 100, Ingarum (Ingraham). Ingersoll, 86, 330, 331, Hay man, 264. Hind, 166, 421. 112, 113, 171, 241, 247, 422, 451, 476. Haynes (Haines). Hinkley, 439, 455, 460. 250, 255, 265, 338, 372, Ingolls, 126, 155, 370, /M,i ,101 Hayson, 140, 154, 157, 336, 426. Hinksman ( Hench man). 428. Howell, 7, 75, 285, 330, 414, -i-l . Ingollsby (En go lls- Hayward, 85, 114, 170- 172, 286, 375, 428, Hinsdall, 137, 245, 247, 250, 253. 334, 336, 362. Ho wen (Howell). bee). Ingraham, ) 99,116,117, 456, 457. Hinxen, 334, 335, 337. Howes, 441, 455. Ingram, j 177, 250, Haywood, 197, 278. Hazeltine, 346, 372. Hitchborn, 52, 72. Hitchcock, 250, 252, 253. Howing, 260, 285. Howland.l, 439. 253, 444, 445. Ingsbee, 177. Hazen (Hayson). Heale, 122. Hix (Hicks). Hoadly, 89. Hewlett, 472. Hoxly, 96. Ireson, 51, 71, 154, 157, 161, 207, 371, 477. Healy, ( 58, 170, 171, Hely, J 272, 373, 408, Hoar, 76, 77, 354, 355, 396, 401, 459. Hoyt, 131, 135, 140, 250, 253. Irish, 457. Irons, 51, 339, 365, 368. 419. Hobart, 382, 434. Hubbard, 26, 52, 56, 65, Ives, 421. Heard, 316. Hobbs, 85,136,138-140, 75, 90, 93, 103, 121, Hearsey, 162, 276. 156, 273, 283, 342, 370, 129, 131, 136, 139, 143, J. Heath, 55, 367. 374, 424, 437, 449. 149, 153, 162, 164, 169, Jacklin, 257. Hebbert (Heberd). Hobkins, 157. 171, 173, 186-188, 190- Jackson, 81, 130, 133, Heberd, 140, 154, 157, Hobomak, 4, 5, 6. 192,198, 201, 202,204, 157, 164, 207, 217, 260, 358, 370. Hobson, 207, 338, 408, 218, 227-230, 241, 263, 278, 362, 414, 419, 448, Hedding, 154. 413, 414, 416. 269, 271, 296, 302, 306, 464. Hedge, 14,439,455,466. Hodges, 458. 312, 326, 333, 342, 344, Jacob, ) 142, 161-163, Hedley, 170, 172, 419. Hodgkin, 155, 158, 425. 345, 363, 383, 385, 428, Jacobs, \ 184, 207, 214- Hegon (Megone). Hodgman, 83, 247, 250, 460-462, 473. 216, 218, 220, 221, 260, Heiden (Hayden). 276, 277, 283, 375, 420. Huchin, 167. 283-285, 368, 370, 414, Heison, 336. Hodaden, 302. Huckins, 167, 183, 439, 433. Hencher (Hincher). Holbrook, 162, 270, 280, 449. James, 64, 71, 250, 253. Henchet (Hanchat). 281,282,433,447,473. Hudson, 51, 91, 137, Jameson, 161, 240, 248. Henchman, 27-32, 38, Holden, 58, 264, 274, 139,140,177,222,241, Jaque, 114, 240. 45, 47-58, 65, 66, 79, Holding, i 373, 405. 272, 280, 426, 428, 452, Jaques, 161, 240, 241, 80, 89-91, 93-95, 112, Holess (Hollis). 473. 278, 363, 434, 449. 120, 123, 126, 152, Holland, 55, 272, 274. Hughes, 100, 240, 241, Jay, 239. 177, 205, 262, 267, Hollis, 162, 165, 166, 279, 247, 250, 261, 431. Jeans (Janes), 130. 268, 270, 285, 291, 421, 433. Huggin, 449. Jeffers, 75, 122, 177, 241. 301, 315, 316, 346, Holloway, 362, 427,457, Hull, 23, 45, 51, 70,77, 92, Jefford, 166, 207, 372. 358, 374, 378, 395, 466. 100, 113, 127, 133, 136, Jeffries, ( 18, 52, 118, 398, 399, 403, 462, Hollybut, 466. 138, 157, 173, 176, 177, Jeffery, 1 176,293,357, 473, 474, 480. Holman, 64, 74, 264, 364, 195, 220, 221, 230-232, 424, 434. Hendly, 68. 369, 452, 457, 471. 248, 250, 310, 323, 370, Jefts, 122. Henfield, 310. Holmes, 11, 93, 136, 138, 424, 427, 443, 445-447, Jellet(Gillett). Hening, 368. 239, 248, 364, 365, 373, 453, 473, 479. Jemmison (Jameson). Henrick, 92, 154, 157, 429, 443-446, 451, 456, Humkins (Hunkins). Jenkins, 55, 176, 177, 277, 291, 346, 372, 457. Humphreys, 161, 162, 457, 458. 426. Holt (Hoult). 364, 365,432, 452,470, Jenks, 422. Henshaw, 85, 264, 436. Holton, ) 165-167, 236, 476. Jenner, 418. Herimon (Harriman). Houlton, } 421. Hungerford, 444, 446. Jenney, 457. Herman (Harmon). Holyoke, 37, 245-247, Hunkens, 167, 207. Jennings, 43, 91, 156, Herring, 285, 414, 448. 475. Hunnewell (Honey 207, 250, 355, 370, 372, Herrington, 170-172, Homes (Holmes). well). 428, 443, 445. 418, 419. Honeywell, 336, 338, Hunt, 49, 51, 157, 161, Jennison, 8, 472. Herrick, 260, 407, 421, 339, 476. 176, 177, 221, 240, 250, Jent, 452. 423. Hood, 172, 222, 279. 253, 254, 350, 431, 436, " Jeremie" (Indian). Herse, 364. Hooper, 55, 165, 222. 438, 440, 449, 456, 463. Jerrin (Gerrin). Hesey (Hasey). " Hope-Hood," 296. Hunter, 81, 395. Jessop, 52, 239, 240, 249. Hewes (Hughes) Hopes, 172. Hunting, 37, 38, 40, 42, Jethro, 307, 309, 460. Hewins, 255, 361. Hopgood.(Hapgood). 229, 230, 271, 289, 290, Jewell, 52, 365, 374. Hewit, 93, 260. Hopkins, 1,52,217,226, 306, 309, 311, 312, 320, Jewett, 157, 165, 221, Heydon, 13. 231, 241, 343, 362, 427, 322, 346, 374, 385, 403, 413, 414, 415, 449. Ueywood, 231, 420. 457, 463-465, 477. 404. Jinks, 72. Hibbert (Heberd). Hoppin, 260, 281, 285, Huntly, 443, 444, 445. Jocelyn, ) 195, 322, 325, Hicks, 240, 274, 347, 289, 367. Hunton, 227. Joslin, { 326,334,335, 421, 422, 424. Homer, 75. Hurd, 133, 259. 336,353. INDEX OF NAMES. 493 John, 84, 133, 174, 217, Rillcup, 452. Latimer, 467. 226,240,307,362,386. Kindrick, 427. LaTour, 325. Johnson, 52, 71, 72, 75, King, 52, 133, 136, 138, Laurence, ) 56, 86, 96, 80-83, 95, 119, 121, 162, 163, 176, 210, 211, Lawrence, j 170, 171, 122, 151-153, 159-163, 224, 225, 242, 250, 253, 195, 222, 273, 274, 364, 166, 172, 176, 183, 187, 278,351, 366,372,452. 371, 373, 375, 436, 474. 190,191,193, 210, 211, Kingman, 162. Layton, 155, 157, 415, 232, 278, 284-286, 289, Kingsby (Kinsbury). 460. 292, 338, 339, 360, 369, Kingston, 365, 368. Lazell, 161, 162, 407. 371, 372, 374, 395, 406, Kinne (Keene). Leach (Leech). 413, 416, 418, 422, 426, Kinsbury, 346,372,415. Leane (Lane). 435,436,443-445, 446, Kinsman, 278, 415. Learned, ) 170, 171, 272, 450, 458, 473-475, 477. Kirkland, 278. Lerned, j 358. John ( " Stonewall " ), Kiswas, 11. Leatherland, 100, 279. 181, 385. Kitchell, 468. Leaver (Lever). Jones, ( 2, 51, 56, 64, Kitteridg, 113, 114. Leavitt, 363. Joanes, \ 72, 118, 122, Kittery (Kitteridge). Ledebetter, 221, 368, 156, 157, 166, 207, 217, Kittle, I 273, 286, 353, 432. 239, 240, 241, 249, 250, Kettle, i 418. Lee, 250, 253, 286, 293, 253, 259, 260, 264, 272, Knap, 63, 121, 261, 281. 452. 273, 285, 286, 310, 338, Kneeland (Neland). Leech, 55, 71, 72, 139, 356, 357, 361-363, 370, Knight, 100, 165-167, 155, 157, 431, 474, 480. 371, 373-376, 382, 420, 176,177,239,248,259, Leeds, 250, 253, 448. 432, 435, 437, 439, 444, 274,281,434,444,445. Leese, 444, 445. 445, 448, 458, 461, 477. Knott, 74, 176, 182, 239, Leete, 464, 465. Jordan, 339, 369, 370. 248, 421, 440. Lefflngwell, 441, 442, Jose, 293. Knowles, 440, 461. 446, 468. " Joshua," 120. Knowlton , 154, 155, 157, Leigh, 71, 477. Joy, 443, 445. 365, 415, 449. Lemon, 1 72, 166, 418, Judd, 129, 134, 221, 426. Knox, 178. Leman, \ 477. Judkins, 239, 248. Konkga nasco (Conk- Lendall, J 64, 176-178, Judson, 61, 62, 468. ganasco). Lindall, ( 219, 431. Kutquen, 354. Leonard, 221, 250, 253, K. Kylam (Killam). 264,371,376, 428,460. Kankamagus, 300, 315 , Lernett (Learned). 316. L. Lever, 240, 283, 371. Kattenanlt, 76, 213, 221, Ladd, 283, 292,358, 372, Leverett, 22, 49, 62, 66, 352, 398, 400, 402. 415. 92, 151, 179, 192, 202, Keates, ) lnft Lagreve, 450, 234, 395, 469, 473. Keatts ( Lake, 53, 315, 321, 439, Levins, 130, 369, 451. Keayne, 86, 472. 473. Levitt, 100, 118,357,449. Keehood, 105. Lakeman, 414. Lewes (Lewis). Keene, ) 52, 58, 72, 373, Lakin, 373, 474. Lewis, 51, 241,254, 273, Kean, i 415,438,443, Lamb, 55, 152, 162, 265, 278, 339, 350,359, 371, 445, 477. 277, 365, 368, 369, 426, 418, 422, 429, 439, 440, Keep, 282. 466. 442, 445, 449, 463, 468. Keett, 250, 253. Lambard (Lambert) . Libby, 330, 334-336, 339. Keith, 425. Lambert, 13, 136, 138, Lickens, 131, 132, 133. Keizer, 346, 372. 232, 421, 449, 451. Lidgett, 177, 178. Kelling, 118, 357, 374. Lamson, ( 170, 172, Lillye, 458. Kellog, 245, 250, 253, Lampson, j 240, 248, Linckhorn (Lincoln). 425, 475. 273, 279, 358, 375, 406, Lincoln, 122, 161, 162, Kellon, 272. 407, 420, 424, 449. 163, 407, 433. Kelsie, 443, 445. Lancton, 338. Lind (Lynd). Kemble, j 52, 55, 71, Landon, 72, 100, 161, Lindall (Lendall). Kemball, i 136, 138, 176, 177, 363, 431. Line (Lind). 139, 166, 167, 176-178, Lane, 64, 71, 72,86,161, Linnell, 439, 441. 207, 278, 286, 303, 304, 162, 176, 177, 222, 240, Linnet, 350. 346, 372, 415, 423, 451, 241, 259, 426, 431, 433, Linsey, 166, 167, 207, 477. 477. 371, 406, 407, 422. Kempthorne, 155. Kendall, 58, 83, 176, 177, Langbury, 71, 72, 138, 240, 247, 250. Linsford (Brinkford). Linsley, 371. 264, 276, 277, 376, 435. Langdon, 75, 155, 156, Little, 349, 415, 450. Keniday (Canada). 157, 165. Littleale, ) , ,30 Keniston, ) 155, 157, Langley, 161-163, 433, Littlehall, ( ldB> 1>S8< Kenniston, \ 415. 436. Littlefield,476. Kennedy (Canada). Langor, 407. Livermore, 81, 356. Kennicott, 64. Langworthy, 365. Livingstone, 434. Kenny, 82, 166, 283, 291, Larabe, 444, 446. Lizonby, 177. 371, 421, 452. Largin, 241,359,361,399. Lloyd, 56. Kenrick, 457, 463. Larkin, 444, 446. Lobdell, 222. Kent, 82, 83, 264. Lamed, 272, 437, 451. Locke, 66, 91, 452. Kerby, / 51, 55, 122, 176, Laroby, j 9 oa o fifi 07- Loker, 224, 225. Kirby, i 177,239,248. Leroby, \ ^ 8 ">"""i" a Long, 73, 83, 260, 264, Kerly.210,211,353,474. Larrison, 56. 363, 364, 374, 418. Kertland, 207, 361, 406. Lasel, 259. Longberry (Langbury) . Kettle (Kittle). Lash, 452. Looke, 165, 167, 406. Keweenam, 461. Laskin, 217, 362. Looker, 435. Keyes, 225, 475. Latham, 443, 445. Loomis, 446, 449, 467, Keyser, 138. Lathrop, ) 32, 66-68, 75, 468,475. Kidd, 278. Lothrop, \ 115,120,121, Lord, 273, 374, 443-146, Kidder,123, 230, 366,474. 127-130, 133-141, 143, 449, 466, 467. Kilborne, 137, 138. 210,241,245,349,361, Loring, 280. Killam, 155, 157. 374, 418, 443-445, 475, Lothrop (Lathrop). Kimball (Kemball). 476. Lovejoy, 167, 207, 372. Lovell, 1 155, 157,158, Lovewell, ( 161, 415. Lovett, 156, 162, 370. Low, I 73, 74, 197, 274, Lowe, i 349, 356, 363, 374, 415, 477. Lowd, 240, 241, 452. Lowden, 81-83, 100, 283, 365,374,417,418,448. Lowell, 338, 356, 450. Loyal, 22. Lucas, 450. Luce, 452. Ludden, 240, 280. Ludlow, 17, 19, 465, 469. Lufkin, 424. Lumbert, 439, 440. Lummis (Loomis). Lunn, 170, 172, 358, 424. Luscome, 336. Lux, 333. Luz, 17. Lycuss (Lickens). Lyford, 7. Lyrnan, 242, 244, 250, 253. Lynd, 83, 126, 177, 207, 296, 310, 375, 399, 418, 479. Lyon, 56, 58, 222, 240, 241, 247, 249, 250, 281, 364, 365, 369, 426, 432, 448. M. Macanab, 448. Maccomber, 427. Macloud, 352, 353. Macranell, 236, 240, 279. Mackfassett, 170, 273, 373 Macshawin, 331, 334. Mactonell, 260, 273, 376. Macy, 456. Maddis, 338. Maderill, 72, 176, 177. Madockawando, 40,310, 311, 314. Magenis, 52, 71, 114, 176, 272, 274, 363, 448, 477. Magery (Majore). Magoon, 449. Magnus (Quaiapen). Maier, 157. Mainard, 210. Maine, 442,443, 445. Majore, 165, 166, 421. Makanno (Mriksah). Makenny, 285, 334, 339, 363. Maker, 439. Malardino, 75, 338. Mallett, 452. Malony, I ,, , o 7fi Malloone, r 5 359 3 6 McKenny (Makenny). McKennyes (Magenis). McSparran, 185. Mane, 93. Manly, 51, 240, 432. Mann, 55, 165, 239, 240, 247, 249, 251, 260, 371, 429, 430, 452, 480. Manning, 61, 62, 72, 86, 137-139, 184, 277, 278, 319, 366, 424. Mansell, 100, 118, 357. Mansfield, 155, 184, 406. Maramasquand, 316. Marble, 355. Marchant, 186, 456. Mardon, 167. Mare, 162. 494 KING PHILIP S WAR. Markes, 154, 156, 157, Middleton.177,277,339, 236, 263, 266, 292, 295, Newmarch, 156, 157, 372, 382. 340, 452, 476. 296, 300, 350, 351, 364, 415. Markham, 131, 132. Mighill, 86, 277, 409, 396, 401-403,431,432, Newton, 210, 211,239, Marrett, 272. 413, 415. 436, 437, 464, 477, 480. 338, 364, 369, 467. Marsh, 100, 421. Miles, 27, 48, 63, 65, 80, Moses, 467, 468. Nichols, 64, 71, 163, Marshall, 76, 82, 83, 196, 256, 435, 460, 468. Moss, 57, 92, 260, 273, 170, 172, 197, 241, 258, 137, 183, 191, 193, 363, Millard,274, 356, 360. 279, 360, 370. 286, 326, 340, 355, 356, 370, 466, 468. Miller, 52, 53, 58,81,85, Mossup, 385. 358,368,372,375,406. Marston, 155, 419, 449. 131, 145, 221, 222, 239, Moulton, 166, 281, 370, 407,420,424,429,477, Martin, 184, 210, 286, 247, 250, 253, 260, 265, 449. Nicholson, 222, 260, 309, 321,358, 375,415, 273, 274, 279, 350, 374, Mountjoy (Munjoy) . 424, 452. 421, 427, 463. 404, 418, 432, 448, 463, Mousall, 75, 85, 272, Nickards, 450. Martineau, 141. 464. 374, 418, 477. Nilea, 152, 162, 268. Marvin, 266. Mills, 264, 339, 364, 368, Moussell (Mousall). Nimrod, 31, 462. Mason, 11-20, 70, 78, 451. Mower, 206, 406, 420, Nims, 251, 253. 81, 130, 135, 168, 183, Milton, 222, 338, 357, 422. Ninigret, ) 20-23, 88, 191, 193, 225, 227, 228, 467. Moyer, 446, 450. Ninicraft, ) 120, 190, 241, 265, 279, 366, 367, Minds, 75. Mriksah, 181. 201, 203, 381, 382. 427, 441, 442, 465-168, Miner, 83, 442-446, 468. Muchin, 268. Nixon, 283. 474, 480. Mingo, 82. Muckamug, 316. Noble, 253. Massaeoit, 3-6, 24, 377, Minott, 93, 162, 264, 364, Mudg, 72, 76, 137, 274, Noncatonsoo, 105. 385. 368. 366, 375, 418, 420, 477. Nookins, 335. Masters, 154, 157. Minton (Mintor). "Mugg" (Mog). Norcross, 241, 365, 376, Maston, 165. Mintor, 443, 445. Mugrige, 414. 419. Matantuck (Quaiapen). Mather, 65, 66, 82, 83, Miriam, 82. Mirick, 52,273,358,365, Mulbery, 100. Mulford, 440. Norden, 72, 259. Norman, 260, 278, 372, 90, 103, 129, 136, 220, 374, 427, 440. Mullard (Mollard). 475. 228, 230. 244, 460, 462. Missatt, 452. Mun, 251, 253, 254, 466. Norris, 449. Matoon, 154, 155, 157, Mitchell, 61, 62, 241, 329, Munge, 72, 126. North, 56, 58, 292, 361, 239, 241, 251, 253, 364. 331, 415, 428, 449, 450, Munjoy, 61, 321, 332, 368. Matson, 92, 358, 370, 452, 461. 452. Northcoate, 458. 372. Mitchenson, 85, 273, Munninge, 59. Northrop, 444, 446. Mattahando, 41, 314. 286, 360, 373. Munson, 221, 466-468. Norton, 6, 93, 118, 149, Mattaloos (Mattoonas) . Moate, 458. Murphy, 363, 444, 446. 165, 347, 357, 366, 465. Mattashunannamoo, 26. Modsley, 364. Muschin (Muskins). Nourse, 352. Matthews, 64, 71, 72, Mog (Mugg), 40,41,42, Musgrove, 241, 261,361, Nowell, 71, 98, 101, 182, 145, 170, 350, 359, 431, 310, 311, 323, 335-338. 415. 285, 403. 439, 477. "Mogg Megone" Muskins, 286, 373. Noyes, 85, 86, 126, 183, Mattoonas, 31, 105, 106, (Mog). Mutson, 222. 224, 225, 227, 230, 429, 112, 386, 479. Mollard, 72, 132. Muttaump (Mautamp). 443, 444, 445, 450. Maudesley (Mosely). Molt, 241, 361. Muzzey, 58, 83, 436, Num, 461. Mautampe, ( 29, 105, Molton (Moulton). 437. Numphow, 300, 301, Muttaump, j 112, 386, Monoco, 132, 352, 386. Mygatt, 467. 304, 309, 399, 401. 400. Mononotto, 16, 19. Nutter, 314. Maxfield, 264, 362, 364, Monopoide, 383. V. Nutting, 121, 125. 368. Monowattuck, 17. Nanamocomuck, 300. Nye, 350. May, 53, 73,76,450,477. Monsall (Mousall). Nanepashemet, 4. Nyrick (Mirick.) Mayn (Maine). Monteague, 251. Nanunteno (Canon- Maynord, 224. Montt, 96, 195. chet). 0. Mayo, 72, 274. Moody, 413, 416. Naoas, 398. Oakes, 79,80,81,84,85, Mead, 286, 364, 373. Moore, 58, 81, 82, 83, 86, Nash, 82, 162, 217, 247, 97, 284, 436, 474. Means, 432. 138, 192, 197, 224, 225, 280, 355, 362, 364, 456- Oakman, 334, 337. Meares, 100, 177, 480. 278, 334, 336, 337, 339, 458, 467, 468. Gates, 52, 68, 75. Measie, 75, 176. 363, 371, 415, 419, 432, Naghacowam ) (Sho- Oazier, | ,,, ,o 8 o 72 Mecanny (Makenny). 444, 449, 468. Nashoonan \ Ian). Osyer, ( 1M > ld <* * Meekins, 137, 149. Moosucke, ) sa Nathaniel, 397. Obbatinewat, 4. Meginny (Magenis). Mootucke, | 88 Neale, 154, 157, 165, Odrigo (Rodrigo). Mego, 448. Moraine, 58,176,177,264. 166, 183, 241, 259, 310, Ogleby, 52, 336-339. Megone (Hegone). Morell, 132, 413. 331, 371, 421, 475. Okerby, ) 52 72 4n Megunnaway, 314. Morgan, 60, 166, 167, Necks, 56. Okleby, 1 "* 2 > 477> Mellardy (Malardino). 240, 250, 253, 361, 423, Needham, 81, 86, 264, Old, 251, 444, 445. Mellis (Mellows). 441, 443, 446, 477. 273, 277, 437, 480. Oldham,7, 8. Mellows, 161, 162. Moring, 241. Negus, 51, 55. "Old Queen " (Quaia Melvin, 272, 286. Morren (Moraine). Neland, 155, 283, 370, pen). Memecho, 109, 111, 112, Morrill (Morell). 415, 420, 423, 431, Oliver, 23, 46, 53, 70, 74, 121, 395. Morris, 52, 55, 64, 161, 434. , 81, 85, 142, 152, 153, Mendall, 457. 162, 216, 279, 361, 363, Nelson, 309. f J I 164, 169, 173-178, 180- Menter, 137, 138. 428, 471. Nemasit, 431, 474. 182, 187, 190, 191, 291, Merriam, 83. Morrison, 52. Nepanet, 354. 332, 334, 336, 404, 432, Merrifleld, 260,274, 281. Morrone (Moraine). Nessefteld, 350. 435, 473. Merritnan, 468. Morse, 72, 92, 144, 155, Nesutan, 390, 395. Olmsted, j , 466 _4 6 o Merrit, 1 ,07 -100 179, 182, 359, 431, 480. Nevell, 64. Omsted, J13, 466-4b8. Merrett, } 137> 138 Mortmore, 222. Nevers, 357, 358. Olverton, 149. Merry, 250, 253, 449. Morton, 1, 300, 456. Newbury, 240, 251, 252, Oneko,30, 36, 94, 383, Meservey, 452. Mory, 222, 369, 432, 440. 361, 375, 467, 468. 392. Messenger, 52. Mosarvy (Meservey). Newell, 100, 126, 155, Orchard, 52. Messey, 64. Mosely, 27, 28, 31, 32, 38, 162, 232, 264, 369, 375, Ordway, 371. Melacom(Pometacom) , 48, 49, 50, 59-71, 73- 418, 422, 451. Orris, 55, 81, 161, 211, (Philip). 80, 89-91, 93, 95, 97, Newhall, 157. 217, 239, 248, 362, 444, Miantonomo, 6, 8, 12, 101, 115, 120, 121, 122, Newland, 456. 445. 20, 21, 379, 384. 128, 133-136, 143, 148, Newman, 30, 31, 49, Osborne, 51, 86, 232, Micheson ( Mitchen- 149, 152, 153, 109, 174, 51, 86, 156, 158, 239, 365, 421, 466. son). 175, 180-182,185, 187, 240, 249, 338, 349, 374, Osgood, 447. Middlecott, 480. 190, 191, 193, 209, 213, | 415, 464. Osyer (Oazier). INDEX OF NAMES. 495 Otis, 316. Peek-worth, 292. Pickering, 67, 118, 143, Preston, 140, 166, 167, Overing, 437. Pegin, 268, 398. 155, 176, 357, 474. 240, 251, 253, 372, 423. Overton (Olverton). Peirce, ) 19, 35, 52, 78, Picket, 334, 423. Price, 55, 126, 164-166, Owen, 52, 162, 216, 217, Peirse, { 83, 85, 99, Pickworth, 166, 167, 372, 170, 171, 177, 241, 251, 361, 362, 427. Pearce, ) 133, 155,157, 421. 253, 286, 339, 376, 474, Owenequo, 151. 170, 172, 195, 207, 227, Pierpont, 56. 475. Oxenbridse, 234. 249, 251, 260, 265, 272, Pike, 241, 247, 251, 259, Prichard, 108, 109, 115, Oyne, 58, 260, 264, 272, 273, 276, 277, 280, 286- 261, 309, 342, 361, 365, 165. 376. 289, 342, 347-349, 359, 374, 375, 406, 407, 416, Priest, 52, 170, 172, 239, Ozzier (Oazier). 376, 382, 389, 415, 429, 419, 474-476. 248, 358, 359, 376, 419, 441,450,463,464,476. Pilsbery, 310, 358, 365, 429, 437, 452. P. Peksuot, 5. 371. Prime, 416. Packer, 444. Pelham, 225. Pinchon, 1 12,18,19,32, Prince, 11,137,161, 163, Paddy, 457. Pell, 11. Pynchon, ( 33, 41, 68, 165, 167, 207, 421, 431, Padlefoot, 274, 373, 437. Pellington, 118, 221, 69, 105, 112, 121, 128, 451, 455, 457, 459. Paige, 28, 48, 49, 79, 85, 240, 357, 363. 134, 143-147, 150, 152, Pringridays, 145. 86,90,91,95,111,112, Pemberton, 52, 64, 72, 266, 288, 365, 369, 475. Prior, 156, 158. 277, 282, 403. 259, 265, 281, 364, 375, Finder, 58, 264. Pritchett (Prichard). Pain, ) 81, 85, 91, 94, 415. Pingry, 449. Prize (Price). Paine, 1 100, 142, 260, Pembleton(Pendleton). Pinly (Plinly). Procer, 52, 75, 176, 177, 264,285,313,314,317, Pemerton ( Pemberto n ) . Pipin, 157. 241, 281, 365. 364, 440, 463. Pendall, 444. Pitcher, 75, 162, 163, Proctor, 58, 86, 122, 363, Pakashokag, 386. Pendleton, 225, 297, 364, 3d5, 367, 369. 370. Palmer, 18, 138, 155, 298, 322, 329, 331-333, Pitman, 130, 138, 371. Prosser (Procer). 157, 202, 278, 283, 370, 443, 444, 476. Pittam, 222. Prout, 81, 83, 278, 429. 371,415, 443,446,456, Pengilly, 154, 155, 157, Pittimee, 402. Proute, 434, 464. 463, 466, 467. 260, 370, 426. Pixly, 137. Provender, 72, 437, 477. Palmes, 442, 446, 467. Pengry, 138, 157. Plaisted, 64, 295,302,476. Pudenter, 260, 372. Parham, 52. Penniman, 82, 83, 94, Plant, 445. Puffer, 282. Parke, 1 132, 133, 376, 364. Platts, 206. Pugsley, 439. Parks, j 419, 443, 445, Pepar (Pepper). Plimpton, 71, 137, 225, Puinder (Provender). 446. Pepper, 131, 132, 155, 347, 369, 434, 477. Purnroy, 251, 253. Parker, 30, 52, 56, 110, 231. Plinly, 363, 366, 431. Purchase, 466. 114, 120-124, 154, 166, Perkes, 480. Plom, 202. Putman, 1 82, 83, 111, 167, 170, 206, 221, 225, Perkins, 51, 85/93, 118, Plum, 137, 138, 162, 281, Putnam, j 291,421,451, 239, 260, 265, 273, 274, 155-157, 165, 167, 207, 285, 444, 446. 475. 281, 282, 286, 345, 355, 344, 357, 370, 423, 431, Plummer, 82, 83, 130, Pynchon (Pinchon). 358-360, 362-364, 367, 449, 451. 138, 162, 415. 368, 375, 376, 416, 420, Perry, 63, 88, 273, 349, Pocock, 149, 258, 259. Q. 422,423,435,444,445, 358, 376, 427, 463. Pollard, 64, 81,100,207, Quaddington, 452. 448, 462, 474. Person, 83, 130, 358. 360, 431. Quaiapen, 180,181, 192, Parkhurst, 171, 419. Pessacus, 21, 22, 385. Polly, 52, 58, 170, 172, 244, 387. Parlor, 155, 157. Petananuit, 24, 377. 272, 286, 358, 376. Quanapawhan, 461. Parmater (Parmenter) . Peter, 73, 180, 186, 192, Polott, 166. Quanansit(Canonchet) . Parmenter, j 81, 82, 83, 193, 304. Pomham, 73, 82, 174, Quannapohit, 97, 213, Parmiter, j 217, 224, Peter-Nunnuit (Peta 180, 192, 200, 384, 479. 268, 352, 394, 395, 398, 362, 419, 443, 445. nanuit). Pond, 222, 368. 400, 402. Farmer (Palmer). Peters, 423, 449. Poole, 48, 98, 116, 140, Quanohit, 354. Parneer, 292. Peterson, 443, 445. 147, 149-153, 211, 212, Quaquackis, 203. Parris, 72, 357-359, 405. Petonowowett (Petana 222, 237, 240, 258-261, Quaqualh, 385. Parrum, 279. nuit). 276, 277, 289, 292, 361, Quarles, 449. Parry, 273, 358. Petts , 149. 369, 455, 474. Quiddington, 149, 452. Parsons, 130, 239, 248, Petuhanit, 108, 395. Poore, 155, 158, 241, 361, Quincy, 473. 358, 415, 466. Phelps, 166, 319, 345, 415, 450. Quinnapin, 36, 377, 381, Partridg, 118, 357. 372, 423, 437, 467. Pope, 457, 461. 385. Partsmore, 157. Phesy (Veze). Poply, 356. Quint, 293. Pashly, 260, 272, 356. Philbrick, 449. Poquahow, 107. Pasmore, 64, 100, 361, Philip, 3, 24-31, 34, 36, Porey, 462, R. 370. 38-40, 48-50, 53, 57, Porter, 72, 159, 281, 319, Rainsford, 100, 241, Passaconaway,299, 300. 65, 67, 68, 73, 76. 80, 407, 423, 467, 468. 247, 251. Patrick, 11, 12, 15, 16, 83, 87-90, 93-98, 104- Potok, 385. Ramsdell, 422, 426, 429, 18, 470, 471. 106, 112, 121, 128, 144, Potter, 82, 83, 189, 207, 450. Pa ten, 171. 148, 151, 194, 199, 200, 231, 361, 370, 406, 413, Ramsey, 71, 72, 477. Patterson, 13, 58, 113, 203, 204, 208, 236, 237, 415, 422, 442, 444, 450. Rand, 207,272, 286,374, 114, 436, 445, 466. 243, 244, 247, 261, 263, Potts, 442, 444, 445. 422. Pattison / , p 266, 276, 280, 285, 291, Powell, 56, 155,il76, 177. Randall, 72, 102,260,281. Paddison 1 (itterson.) 297, 301, 305, 348, 351, Powers, 102. Randlett, 296. Paule, 285. 355, 377-381, 384, 388, Pratt, 5, 72, 240, 251, Randolph, 158. Pay-son, (81, 82,93, 264, 390, 394, 395, 400, 453, 253, 255, 286, 349, 361, Ransford (Rainsford). Pason, i 364,368,432. 460-462,464. 373, 418, 466, 467, 468. Rathbone, 282. Peabody, (165,167,319, Phillips, 64, 71, 72, 81, Prentice, (27,47-49,52, Ratt, 51, 91. Pabody, j 423, 424. 92, 100, 108, 113, 118, Premise, j 65, 70,74,79, Raven, 293. Peach, 290. 142, 167, 240, 273, 282, 80-85, 89-91, 95, 117, Ravensbee, 206, 371. Peacock, 64, 279, 3(56. 286,297,298,326,347, 133, 152, 153, 161, 179, Bavenscraft, 241, 259, Pearch, 375. 349, 357, 361, 369, 370, 181, 183, 190, 200,202, 260. Pearson, ) 138, 207, 415, 373, 376, 418, 433, 457, 204, 228-230, 270, 272, Rawlins, 118, 156, 157, Peirson, $ 416, 451. 461, 466, 476, 477. 273, 286, 373, 394-397, 239, 240, 357, 415, 449, Pease, 154, 157, 207, Philvbrown, 450. 404,419, 435-438,474. 478, 480. 371, 372. Phinly (Plinly). Prescott, 57, 76, 114, Rawson, 47, 59, 88-90, Peasley, 413, 415. Phinney, 439. 121, 166, 260, 374, 376, 117, 121, 143, 168, 192, Teener, 428. Phip*, 81, 85, 229, 264, 434, 436. 193,215,225,226,237, Pecke, 100, 130, 139, 374. Pressey, 251, 253. 275, 345, 374. 140, 465. Pickard, ( aR 977 ,,, Pressland, 457. Ray, (134,260,274,281, Pecker, 475. Picard, j 90 .-" .* 10 - Pressou (Preston). Rea, i 368, 429. 496 KING PHILIP S WAR. Rayman (Rayment). Rayment, ) 118, 154, Raymond, { 155, 157, 187, 260, 277, 278, 283, 357, 370,406,407, 420, 423. Ray nor, 241, 452. Rea (Ray). Read, ( 64, 72, 74, 81, Reed, ) 85, 100, 122, 161, 162, 165-167, 171, 176, 225, 241, 243, 244, 251, 253, 259, 350, 359, 413, 415,416,418,423, 428, 437, 452, 463, 464, 472. Records, 361, 369. Redding, 457. Redman, 58, 222, 279, 369. Reeves, 86, 467. Regimant, ( 58, 63, 64, Regeman, j 264, 361. Region, 52, 71, 273, 360, 477. Regulus, 383. Reinerd, 444, 446. Remington, 170, 171, 184, 273, 278, 373, 417. Reny, 166. Reylie, 157. Reyner, 282. Reynolds, 235, 239, 279, 429, 444, 445,473. Rhoades, / 61, 62, 167, Roades, { 406. Rice, 58, 71, 72, 167, 170, 172, 210, 211, 225, 226, 272, 419, 433, 448, 451, 477. Rich, 166. Richard, 46. Richards, 41, 81, 83, 100, 152, 161, 162, 177, 362, 371, 406, 428, 432, 445, 467, 473. Richardson, ( 42,43, 58, Richeson, i 82, 83, 85, 109, 113, 139, 155, 157, 207, 272, 276, 277, 285, 290, 300, 301, 338, 344-346, 363, 374-376, 397, 399, 415, 436, 444, 446, 447, 450. Ridaway, 427, 463. Rideat, 210, 211. Rider, 286, 373, 456. Rigby, 100, 368. Riggs, 18. Rigman, 261. Rily, 155. Ringe, ( 139, 154, 157, Ring, j 165, 184, 415, 440. Riply, 83, 221, 240, 364, 427, 432. Rishworth, 332, 333. Roberts, 52,71,150,170, 172, 217, 221, 231, 239, 241,247, 251,297,355, 362,364,369,436,443- 445, 451, 472. Robertson, 449. Robin, 23, 108, 112, 286, 339 Robins, 154, 239, 260, 272, 373, 399, 406, 407, 430, 437. Robinson, 58, 264, 265, 290, 296, 342, 371, 372, 425, 449, 457, 458, 463. Roby, 156, 274, 346, 357, 370, 372. Rocket (Rockwood). Sam (Sagamore Sam). Sexton (Saxton). Rockwood, 345, 365, 369, 453. Samborn, ( 1t . R OT n \ie. Sanborn, | 156,370,476. Shakspeer, 144. Shallarde, 293. Roderigo, 61, 62, 115, Samoset, 3. Shapley, (60,166,304, 338. Sampson, ( 64, 109, 160, Shapleigh, \ 306, 307, Rods (Rhoades). Samson, j 222, 240, 332, 421. Roff, ( 58, 158, 217, 265, 249, 296, 304, 321, 357, Sharpe, 36, 119, 221, Ruff, 1 362, 416. 429, 440, 457. 228, 231, 470. Rogers, 55, 100, 122, Sanders, ( 83, 94, 162, Shattock, 53, 82, 83, 142, 155, 157, 176,177, Saunders, j 274, 364. 103, 133, 336, 376, 418, 251, 253, 273, 331, 339, 368, 373, 458, 468. 436. 366, 415, 423, 432, 438, Sandy, 64, 118, 240,357. Shaw, 100,239,241,289, 443, 445, 451, 456. Sanford, 39, 184, 387, 444, 445, 452. 458. Rolestone, ( 221, 240, 440. Shead, 122, 357, 436. Rowlstone, j 265, 363, Sanger, 133, 170, 171, Sheafe, 272. 364. 272, 426. Shealett, 337. Rolf, 139, 156, 416. Sargent, 55, 100, 118, Sheather, 443, 445. Rollings, 415. 165, 167, 240, 279, 340, Shedd (Shead). Rollins (Rawlins). 357, 424. Sheers, 448. Rood, 444. Sassacus, 6, 7, 9, 12, 15- Sheffield, 64, 154, 157, Rooks, 210. 17, 19. 452. Roote, 152, 466. Roper, 137, 138. 239, 240, Sassamon, 1 26 380 394 Sausaman, j i "> tjo " Sheldon, 129, 130, 141, 170, 172, 245, 326, 329, 248, 251,353, 354, 374. Satell(Sawtell). 331, 332, 336, 437. Ropes, > ,gg ,,g Savage, 28, 29, 34, 35, Shelston, 358. Ropps, ) 46, 48, 49, 52, 60, 65, Shepcutt, 480. Rose, 138, 416. 67, 71, 74-77, 85, 87- Shepheard, ( 72,74,100, Ross, 72, 224, 225, 347, 93,95-98,100-102,117, Shepard, j 157, 240, 374, 375,421,429,445, 118,159,177,182,191, 273, 374, 391, 416, 418, 477. 213,218,235, 237,240, 472, 477. Ros well, 468. 243, 245, 266, 282, 325, Sherly, 249. Round, 76, 176-178. 340, 341, 349, 357, 395, Sherman, 18, 56, 71, 74, Row, 334, 335, 336, 422. 402, 403, 431, 473, 477, 260, 265, 281, 362, 419, Rowland, 444, 446. 479. 477. Rowlandson, 34, 98, 111, Savell, 162. Sherrard, 363. 220,241,244,310,352- Savery, 349, 440. Sherwood, 467. 355, 378, 385, 400, 403. Sawdy, 239, 240, 248. Shipman, 444, 446. Rowlston (Rolestone). Sawin, 283, 286, 355, Sholan, 351. Rownden, 217,362. 357,363,376,418,451. Sholet, 336, 338. Rowse, 349. Sawtell, ( 171, 272, 279, Short, 327. Royal, 279, 374. Satell, \ 356,375,451. Shoshanim, 351, 354. Rucke, 452. Sawyer, j 58, 122, 137, Shother (Sheather). Rudd, 443,446. Sayer, j 138,155,201, Shove, 408, 425, 428. Ruddock, ( 116,208, 209, 260, 265,353,355,359, Shrimpton, 479. Rudduck, i 211,212, 255. 373,416,427, 437, 452. Shuttleworth, 362, 363, Ruff (Roff). Saxton,64, 75,279. 369. Ruggles, 55, 83, 93, 100, Sayward, 157. Sibly, (75, 154, 157, 161,247, 251,277, 430, " Scaeva," 466. Sybly, | 165, 240, 285, 431, 473. Scales, 130, 138. 340, 451. Rumeall, 166. Scammon, 293. Siddall, 55, 71, 477. Rumneymarsh, 97, 300, Scant, 221, 292. Siever (Sever). 394, 404. Scill (Sill). Sihy, j 58, 72, 73, 264, Russ, 68, 71. Scopelin, 52. Syhy, j 281, 347. Russell, 52,60,113,129- Scossoway, 297, 326. Sikes, 253. 131, 133, 134, 136, 137, Scott, 58,71, 81,93,100, Siky, 251, 477. 140, 144, 145, 149, 150, 118, 130, 139, 162, 251, Sill, (54,55,57,68,125, 155, 157, 166, 232, 234, 253, 254, 264, 277, 281, Syll, i 127, 133, 145, 236, 242, 244, 247, 259, 357, 369, 374, 432. 147, 152, 184, 266-275, 272, 283, 286, 349, 371, Scottow, 62, 322, 325- 305,306,320,322,323, 373,417,438,451,458. 329, 331-335, 337-340, 398, 402, 419, 437. Rust, 71, 100, 138, 154, 476. Sillesbie, ( Rfi ,, 157, 165. Scripture, 273, 374. Selsby, j 86) 359 Rutter, 170, 172, 419. Searle, 217, 272, 362. Sillick, 184, 468. Ryall, 55, 162, 330, 338. bears, ( Q- OQ OAO 9is Silver, 450. Seers, i 80 ^ 39 240 248 - Silverwood, 56, 72, 74, S. Seaver (Sever). 477. Sabin, 390, 427, 463. Secomb, 420. Silvester, 75, 259, 261, Sable, 162, 452. Seddon, 365. 369. Sadler, 139, 154, 155, Sedgwick, 133, 472, 473. Simkins, (91,100,197, 157, 416. Safford, 86. Seely (Sealy), 11, 13, 70, 148, 183, 191, 193. Sympkins, ( 240, 432. Simmes, i 85, 87, 247, Sagamore John, 301, Segwell, 285. Symmes, j 435. 304, 399. Selden,251, 253. Simmons, 122. Sagamore Sam, 132, Selenden (Salendine). " Simon," ( 42,171,303, 354, 386. Selsby (Sillesbe). " Symon," \ 304, 305, Sage, 100. Senter, 418. 313, 338. Sahamoshuha, 200. Serjant (Sargent). Simons, ) 170,172,251, Sakins, 162. Serogumba, 304. Simonds, } 273, 351, Salendine, 358, 374. Sessions, 427. Symons, ) 357, 358, Salmon, 150. Sever, ( ,., n o fiQ 360, 376, 414-416, 421, Salter, 75, 170, 171, 240, Seaver, i 231 329 369 436, 437, 452, 469, 480. 251, 253, 273, 274, 355, Severy, 122, 166. Simple, (118,240,249, 373, 374. Sewall, 261, 340,368,433. Sympole, \ 272, 357, Saltonstall, 475. Sewery, 207. 374. INDEX OF NAMES. 497 Simson, ) 154, 155,157, Simpson, j 240, 260, 261, 334, 337, 376, 448. Singlater, (292, 346, Singleterry, i 358, 372. Singleterry (Singlater) . Singletons, 372. Sinkler, 281. Size, 64. Skellito, 338. Skelteane (Skelton). Skelton, 289, 448. Skillings, 428. Skinner, 81, 239, 248, 418, 420, 451. Slead, 338. Sleeper, 156, 370. Sleth, 450. Smallidge, > 52 -, 79 Smallage, \ Z > M > 7 ^ Smart, 449. Smeade, I 137, 243, 251, Smeed, < 253. Smedly, 108, 113, 122. Smith, 14, 51,52, 55,64, 71, 73, 75, 91, 94, 96, 100, 122, 136-139, 153, 159, 170-174, 180, 185, 192-195, 198, 201-203, 205, 222, 224, 225, 239- 241, 248,249,251,253, 260, 261, 264, 265, 272, 273, 277-279, 283, 286, 310, 339, 347, 360, 361, 363, 365, 368, 371, 372, 374-376, 414-419, 432, 437, 439, 443-447, 452, 456, 459, 475, 477, 480. Snitchell, 166, 371. Snow, 170, 171, 172, 429, 436. Snowden, I , nn 9 , n ,,-, Snowdin, ( 10 . 240 > 361 - Soal, 350. Somes (Soames). Soames, ) 167, 421, 444, Somes, i 446. Softley, 341. Solenden (Salendine). Soley, 52, 64. Somerby, 156, 157, 293, 413, 416. Somersby (Somerby). Sosomon, 17. Soule, 457. Soutch, 241, 364. Southcoate, 471. Souther, 64, 456, 457. Southerne (Souther). Southward (South- worth). Southworth, 195, 455, 459. Sowder, 358, 371. Spaford, 82, 83. Sparhawk, 404. Sparke, j 154, 155, 157, Sparks, ( 260,356,358, 371, 416, 449. Sparrow, 183, 440, 462. Spaulding,278,374,437. Speen, 398, 402. Spencer, 272, 281, 368, 468, 472. Sphere, 480. Spike, 155. Spiser, 443, 445. Spofford, 416. Spoonant, 209. Sprague, 23, 58, 75, 114, 126,275,276, 277,350, 360, 375, 382, 418. Spring, 85, 260, 264, 376, 448. Springer, 443, 445. Spurr, 56, 162, 163, 364, 368, 427. Squatido, 301, 304, 306, 313. Squanto, 3, 4, 6. Squaw Sachem, 4, 88, 377. Squire, 239, 248, 272. Stacie, ( 11 J , 165, 166, Stacy, \ 240, 260, 279, 357, 372, 375. Stains, 56, 176, 177, 239, 241, 361, 452. Stain wood (Stanwood). Stamford, i 207,371,415, Stanford, \ 438. Standish, 1, 4, 5, 438, 440, 455, 456, 459, 477. Stanhope, 224. Stanley, 121, 155, 156, 162, 184, 241, 343, 360, 369, 451, 463. Stanton.lS, 23, 49, 162, 383, 443, 444, 446, 466. Stanwood, 207, 260, 310, 355, 370. Staples, 259. Stares, 18, 466. Stark, 443, 445. Starling, 241, 360, 448. Starr, 221, 363, 366, 367, 425. Starts, 339. Stearlin (Starling). Stebins, j 71, 72, 137, Stebbins, ( 241, 251, 253, 477. Stedman, 23, 58, 154, 155, 157, 286,292,358, 373, 432, 467. Steele, 466, 467. Stephens, ( 64, 114, 136- Stevens, \ 138, 167, 176, 177,207,222,225, 273, 282, 352, 360, 372, 374, 400, 421, 422, 443, 445. Stephenson, 251, 253. Sterns, ( 82, 83, 260, Stearns, i 264, 283, 358, 360, 363, 376, 438, 473. Stetson, 457. Steward, 239, 248, 274, 331. Stickney, 138, 155, 157, 206, 416. Stiff, 248. Stileman, 475. Stiles, 466. Stimaon, 156, 157, 272, 286, 375, 416, 449. Stockbridge, 464. Stocker, 171, 424. Stockes.71, 74, 172,450, 477. Stock well, 137. Stoddard, 129, 130, 132, 137, 254. Stokes (Stockes). Stone, 6-8, 52, 58, 82, 83, 134, 149, 260, 265, 273, 283, 360,363, 376, 435, 436, 448, 466. Storer, 416. Story, 155, 157,166,449. Stoughton, 11, 16, 17, 19, 245, 471. Stow, 210. Strabridg, 240, 361,447. Strait, 85. Straton, 100, 157. Stream, 280. Street, 64. Streeter, 52, 85, 273, T^aye r.i 162 222 364 373. Tharly, 86. Strong, 467, 468. Thathan (Tatingham). Stro wbridge (8 1 r a Thaxter, 161, 162, 368, bridg). 433. Stuart, 221. Thaycr (Thare). Stubbing, 443, 446. Thirlo, 413. Stuckley (Stukely). Thomas, ( 30, 31,49, 51, Stukely, 241, 452. Tomas, ( 61, 62, 66, Summers, 81, 83, 418. 71, 72, 74, 81, 155, 157, Sumner, 265. 177, 178,251,254,439, " Sunke Squaw "(Quai- 455-457,462,477. apen). Sutliff,137,247,251,253. Thomson, 437, 458. Thorn, 52, 154,157,165, Sutlive (Sutliff). 433. Sutton, 155, 240. Thorndike, 138. Swady, 118, 285, 357. Thornton, 51, 100, 273, Swaine, ) 71, 75, 155, 439. Sweane, \ 156, 171, Thorp, 52, 155, 279. 182, 191,343,406,407, Thrall, 466. 420, 431, 477. Thresher, 427. Swan, 170,171,272,292, Throp, ; 52, 151, 239, 346, 365, 372, 376, 416, Throope, { 240. 437. Thurston, 82, 83, 100, Sweet (Swett). 280, 285, 368, 414, 416, Sweetsir, 232, 234, 292, 473. 374. Thwing, 449. Swett, 23, 42, 158, 165, Tidd, 474. 183, 201, 338, 342-346, Tidy, )64, 330, 336, 370, 421, 453, 474. Tydey, \ 338. Swift, 30, 94, 226, 364, Tift (Teffe). 369, 396, 404, 473. Tiler, 1 155-157, 422, Switchell, 166, 167. Symma (Simmes). Tyler, ( 437. Tilly, 1,10. Symonds (Simons). Tilston, 56, 221, 368, Sympole (Simple). 407, 409-411, 430, 432. Tilton,152, 257. T. Tily (Tyley). Tahatawarre, 399. Timberlake, 52, 176- Tailer (Taylor). 178, 239, 431. Tainter, ) 127, 133,171, Timberleys (Timber. Tayntor, \ 365. lake). Talbot, 433. Timson (Stimson). Talcott, 38, 270, 467. Ting(Tyng). Tally, 122, 272, 435. Tinkham, 440. Tanner, 196. Tinney (Tenney). Tappin, 139, 140, 155, Tippen, / 42, 329-331, 330. Tipping, ) 335, 337, Tarball, 114, 121, 273, 338, 345. 374, 421, 436. Tippet, 327. Tarbot, 416. Tisdale, 428, 461. Tarbox, 165, 166, 406, Tisquanto (Squanto). 422. Titcomb, 413,414. Tatingham, 155, 156, Tite, 56, 363 260, 274, 436. Tobias, 26. Tatobam, 6, 7. Toby, 440. Tatoson, 461. Tohatoonee, 301. Tay, > 161, 170, 172, 239, Tokomona, 462. Toy, | 240, 245, 248, Tolman, 58, 94, 102, 249, 251, 361. 265. Taylor, j 51, 52, 58, 72, " Tom," 159, 160, 226, Tailor, \ 83, 156, 158, 236, 316, 398. 170, 172, 210, 211, 247, Tombs, 64. 251,254,264,272,273, Tooker, 389. 283, 285, 286, 336, 359, Tooky, 339. 360, 374, 416, 419, 427, Toppan (Tappin). 435, 438^41. Topping (Tippen). Tebb , 52, 452. Torrey, 221, 225, 363, Teed, j ,, 8 - , fifl 452, 456. Tedd, I 5 85 360 Teffe, 175,186, 194,202, ?ozer;! 166 296 302 - 203, 239. Tossier (Toser). Temple, 104, 105, 111, Toten, 91. 129, 130, 170-172, 373, Totenham ) (Tating 435, 437. Totman j ham) . Tenney, 139, 140, 154, Toto, 144. 157, 165, 207, 283, 310, Totoson, 386. 332, 336, 339, 416. Touchwill (Twichell). Terrel, 433. Toute, 458. Terry, 197, 467, 468. Teshmond, 334. Tower, 52. Towers, 83, 88. Thacher, 168, 264, 363, Towle, 344. 376, 439. Towne, 126, 373. 498 KING PHILIP S WAR. Townsend, 78, 165, 167, Veasie (Veze). 406, 422, 437, 473. Veile, 477. Towsely, 156, 166, 370. Verdey, 417, 438. Toy (Tay). Verin, 176, 177, 239, Tracy, 443, 445, 467, 468. 241, 361. Traine.52,357,358,376. Very, ) 51, 139, 154, Trask, 11, 18, 136, 138, Verry, j 156, 416, 421, 165, 167, 257, 420, 421, 451. 436, 472. Veze, >51, 240, 241, Travis, 177, 239, 452. Vesey, 247, 251, 372, Treat, 32, 67, 70, 97-99, 447. 132, 134-136, 143, 145- Vicar, ) 154, 157, 161, 151, 153, 158, 179, 183, Vicary, } 163, 334, 433. 191, 194, 198, 199,201, Vickers, 336, 433. 202, 235, 236, 464-468. Vines, 272, 374. Treby, 197. Vinton, 138. Trescott, 221, 364, 368, Vose, 94, 221, 369, 432. 431. Vowden, 165. Trowbridge, 404, 468, 474. Truelove, 100, 360. W. Trumbull, 191, 418, Waban, 104, 391, 394, 420, 477. 405. Tubbs, 443, 445, 457. Wadduck, 161, 366, Tuckapawillin, 398, 452. 403. Wade, 122, 170, 172, 239, Tucker, 51, 162, 281, 349, 370. 361, 365, 428, 448. Wadly, 449. Tuckerman, 55, 222, Wadsworth, 34, 36, 65, 363, 364, 432. 84, 184, 206, 212, 214- Tufts, 137. 216,218-223, 226-231, Turell, 473. 235,239 284,285,352, Turner, 8, 35,37,65,71, 364, 369, 400, 402, 432, 97, 98, 101, 140, 144, 467. 176-178, 182, 216-218, Waiard (Ware). 221, 232-251, 253-257, Wainwright, > 75, 137- 259, 280, 291,292,361, Waynwritt, J 139, 154, 362, 384, 434, 453, 458, 157, 165, 166, 254, 356, 472, 473, 477, 480. 370, 371. Turtle, 265. Waite, ) 23, 43, 59, Tuspaquin, 24, 26, 385, Waight, [ 104, 115, 143, 386. Wayt, ) 144, 147, 154, Tuttle, 60, 276, 475. 155, 157, 171, 210, 211, Twelves, 473. 225, 245,251,254,272, Twichell, 71, 477. 274, 277, 283, 286, 288, Twing, 240, 264, 273, 375, 376, 416, 436, 474, 279, 405, 458. 480. Twisdell, 197. Waitstill, 451. Twvning, 458. Wakefleld, 72, 75, 177. Tyffe (Teffe). Walcott, 421, 467, 468. Tyley, 240 251, 254, Walden (Walderne). 364. Walderne, / 39, 41, 60, Tyng, (71,169,170,175, Waldron, i 161, 270, Ting, i 183, 191, 261, 293-295, 297, 299, 301- 263, 405, 412, 431. 307, 309-317, 320-322, 326-331, 397, 476, 480. U. Waldo, 108, 113, 114, Umphree (Humphrey) . 360, 448. Uncas, 11-13, 17, 20-22, Wales, 71, 72, 74, 221, 88, 90, 94, 120, 151, 226, 232, 281, 477. 379, 380, 383, 392-394. Walker, 73, 118, 225, Underbill, 8, 10, 11, 13- 240, 241, 247,251,273, 16, 469-471. 286, 338, 350, 374, 415, Underwood, 230, 451. 416, 426, 440, 461, 463, Upchattuck, 105. 472, 477. Updick (Updike). Wall, 166. Updike, 71, 72, 74, 430, Waller, 444, 445, 468. 477. Walles, 51. Upham, ) 146, 147, 152, Walley, 340. Uppum, i 163, 183, 191, Walling, 185. 240, 259, 287-289, 292, Wallingford, 416. 361, 374, 420. Wallis, 274. Uskatuhgun, 354. Walsbery, 364. Uter, 450. Walters, 281. Wamsley, 76, 347. 363. V. Wamsutta, 24, 377. Vales, 450. Wanualaucet, J 38, 40, Vane, 8, 469. Wannal.tnset, j 67, 262, Varnam, 277. 270,300,301,303-307, Vary (Very). 309, 399, 400, 405. Vassell, 456. Ward, 199, 210, 269, Vaughan, 294, 309, 476. 374, 448. Veale (Vely), 71, 166, Wavdall, 86, 260, 278, 224, 260, 346, 347. 338, 423. Ward well (Wardall). Ware, ( 264, 342, 366- Weare, \ 368, 477. Warham, 11, 465. Warman, 138. Warner, 149, 151, 154- 157,242,466,467,475. Warockomee, 304. Warren, 1, 71, 72, 157, 170, 171-176, 227, 272, 286, 322, 376, 419, 431, 437, 477. Warrick, 336. Warriner, 251, 254. Wasgate, 334. Washburn, 428, 458. Waterhouse, 443-446, 480. Waters, 273, 318. 340, 376, 448. Watkins, 429. Watson, 162, 163, 240, 247, 251, 260,286,369, 373, 396, 415, 432, 459. Watts, 32, 52, 70, 120, 128, 130, 154-157, 183, 191, 222, 346, 366, 372, 468. Way, 156, 431. Wayman (Wyman). Weals (Wales). Webb, 53, 63, 72, 154, 157, 165, 251, 254, 359, 364. Webber, 251, 254. Webster, 78, 154, 156, 157, 165, 464, 465. Wedarton (Withing- ton). Wedge, 225. Wedgewood, 18, 449. Weed, 447. Weedeu, 52, 71, 72, 82, 83, 276, 431, 477. Weetamoo, 29-31, 39, 112, 377, 385, 387, 462. Weight (Wight). Welch, / 71, 72,167, 356, Welsh, i 358, 418, 444, 452, 477. Welcom, 86, 349. Welcott, 82, 83. Weld, 74, 137, 179, 182, 274, 357,363,369,432. Welden, 144, 439. Weller, 137. Wellington (Willing- ton). Wellman, 137, 165, 167, 371, 420. Wells, 65, 74, 100, 251, 254, 264, 285, 364, 423, 464-466, 468. Wenmon, ; . r q , R Wenmore, ( 355) 358 Wensteed, 73. Wequash, 12, 13. Wesandowit, 317. Wesson (Weston). West, 458. Weston, 4-6, 71, 72, 477. West wood, 292. Wetherbe, 210. Wetherell, 183, 428. Weymouth, 52, 162, 165, 166, 431. Whale, 225. Whaley, 161. Wharton, 480. Wheat, 273, 360, 435. Wheaton, 161-163, 427. Wheeler, 29, 30, 58, 102- 104, 106-109, 111-115, 121,122,126,128,139, 154, 157, 165, 170, 172, 231, 272, 276,277,346, 352 353, 359, 360, 373, 374, 395, 435, 436, 441- 443, 445, 446, 449, 450, 474. Wheelock, 409, 437. Wheelwright, 87, 332, 469. Wheildon, 458. Whetcomb (Whit- comb). Whetstone, 236, 259. Whicher, I , ln ,,, ,-- Wiener, ! 140 154 > l06 Whipple, 55, 86, 97, 99, 101, 214, 282, 283, 475. Whippo, 51, 177. Whitaker, 274. Whitcomb, 309, 435, 437, 480. White, 55-58, 122, 139, 170, 172, 251,260,265, 272, 277, 278, 286, 291, 334-336, 349, 361, 365, 369, 374, 404, 427, 433, 436, 438-440, 456, 457. Whitehead, 81,466, 468. Whitiug, 83, 85, 94,104, 286, 375, 475. Whitmarsh, 161, 162, 280, 433, 452. Whitmore, 126, 419. Whitney, 53, 83, 140, 170, 171, 272,273,281, 286, 343, 355, 359, 369, 375, 376, 435, 436, 438. Whitt (White). Whitteridge, 137, 139, 240, 247, 251, 361. Whittier, 40, 300, 335. Whittingham, 472. Whittington, 166, 167. Whitwell, 239, 248. Wianenset, 175. Wiborn, 279. Wiener (Whicher). Wickwier,442, 445. Wicomb, ) 86, 283, 371, Wycome, \ 426. Wigfall, 52. Wight, 217, 285,366,368. Wilcott, 371. Wilde, 240, 259, 372, 423, 424. Wilder, 162, 409. Wilkins, 72, 86, 176,177, 241. Wilkinson, 58, 451. " Will," 313. Willard, 22, 23, 30, 32, 53, 55, 56, 66, 110, 114- 116, 119-126, 184, 214, 260, 269, 285, 286, 361, 395, 399, 408, 419, 436, 472, 474. Wilier, 53, 58, 71, 156, 373. Willet, 330, 336, 338,339, 443, 446, 455, 459-461. Willey, 443, 446. William, 281. Wm. Sagamore," 304 Williams, 8, 51, 61, 78, 88, 91, 93, 100, 137, 154, 157, 165, 203, 210, 211, 221, 222, 241, 264, 279, 285, 364, 369, 375, 382, 387, 400, 416, 421, 430-432, 440, 442, 444- 446, 451, 452, 457, 467. Willing, 334, 335, 337, 452. INDEX OF NAMES. 499 Willington, 81, 82, 264, 355, 363, 365, 417-419, 477. Willis, 100, 241, 419, 420, 448, 457, 458, 464, 465, 467. Williston, 71, 72. Willmarth, 427, 463. Willoughby, 469. "Wills, 52, 279, 365. Willymachen, 105. Willts (Wills). Wilson, 11, 55, 64, 84, 110, 115, 126, 131-133, 137, 161, 162,207, 272, 273, 276, 284-286, 368, 374-376, 389, 405, 432, 435, 437. Wilton, 242, 475. Winch, 452. Winchall, 254, 331,334. Winchester, 364. Wincoll, (297,326,327, Winkoll, \ 329, 330, 331, 334, 476. Windam (Windham). Windham, 82, 171, 452. Windoome (Wind- ham). Wing, 83, 114, 277, 350, 376, 436, 439, 440, 473. Winn (Wing). Winnepurkitt, 300. Winnock, 314. Winahip, 171. Winslade, 286. 375, 477. Winslow.1,5,33,64,70, 73, 76, 87, 91-93, 153, 179, 182, 190-192, 201, 202, 204, 205, 219, 220, 222, 226, 263, 291, 347, 360, 375, 391, 420,429, 455, 456, 460, 463. Winter, 58, 265, 338. Winthrop, 7, 8, 17, 88, 89, 112, 159, 164, 193, 203, 318, 340, 442, 445, 464, 465, 467-472. Wise, 55, 184, 202. Wiseman, 52, 240. Wiswall, 84, 100, 448. Witham, 326. Withe, 171. Withington, 162, 281. Witt, 450. Wittuwamet, 5. Witty, 364, 367. Wolfe, 58, 339. Wood, 53, 58, 102, 133, 155, 157,170, 172, 207, 210, 211, 239, 248, 257, 260, 264, 265, 286, 287, 359, 360, 371, 374, 376, 423, 435-437. Woodbridge, 342. Woodbury, j 91,92,137, Woodbery, \ 138, 197, 279, 371. Woodcock, 48, 51, 65,83, 84, 153, 159, 160, 161, 163, 180, 226, 263, 449, 461. Woodhouse, 114, 452. Woodin, 207, 416. Woodis (Woodhouse). Woodman, 416, 472. Woodmaucy, 47, 285. Woodmott, / R , Woodnet, \ ** Woods, 55, 100, 170, 172, 210, 211, 221, 273, 355. Woodward, 48, 56, 64, 83, 132, 154, 156, 165, 170, 171, 182, 2 /4,286, 358, 368, 373, 375, 416, 427, 436. Woodworth, 428, 464. Woody, 100, 452, 473. Woolcock (Welcott). Woolly, 452. Woolson, 81, 260. Woonashum, 31. Wooater, 443, 444. Wootonekanuske, 24, 377. Wormwood, 314. Worthington, 251, 254. Wright, I 59, 82, 83, 100, Write, ( 122,130,224, 225, 239, 248, 251, 254, 276, 362, 376, 407, 434, 436, 437, 448, 452, 467. Wuttasacom p o n u m , 398. Wyatt, 355, 356, 358, 372, 456. Wyman, ( 81-83, 183, Wiman, ( 192, 256, 435, 436, 453, 474. Y. Yates, 56, 477. Yeames, 210. Yeomans, 442, 445. York, 446. Young, 86, 109, 118, 114, 126, 139, 154, 155, 157, 217, 355, 3(32, 416, 449. Youring, 61, 62. Z. Zachariah, 157. Zacharius, 155. INDEX OF PLACES. A. Abbigadassit Fort, 313. Abbington, 438, 440. Acadia, 133. Agawam, 463. Albany, 33, 34, 96, 149, 200, 379. Alfred, 178. Algiers, 293. Amesbury, 249, 251- 253, 412, 447. Amherst, 409, 420, 421. Ammoscoggin,40, 299, 345. Amoskeag Falls, 425. Andover, 156, 167, 344, 372. 382, 420, 422, 447, 475. Annapolis, 170. Arrowsiok,41,305, 313, 314. Ashfleld, 429. Assawomset Pond, 26, 385, 463. Assonett Neck, 463. Athol, 98, 130. Attleboro , 48, 153,428. Auburn, 386. Ayer, 53, 123. B. Backquake (Paquoig), 99. Barbadoes, 285. Barnstable, 350, 438, 439,441,455,456,458. Barrington, 3, 428. Bass River, 133. Bayonne, 479. Bedford, 430, 431. Beer s Hill, 131. Beer s Plain, 189, 266, 346. Bellingham, 430. Bermuda, 19. Bernardston, 252. Berwick, 297, 311, 320, 323, 412. Beverly, 120, 133, 134, 167, 370, 406, 407, 420, 423, 447, 475. Bilboa, 479. Billerica, 56, 85, 108, 114, 250, 356, 373, 382, 434-438, 447, 474. " Billerikye Bridge," 125. Birch Island, 313. Black Point, 41, 42, 62, 311-313, 320-323, 325, 326, 328,329, 331-333, 335-339, 345, 356, 453. Block Island, 7, 8, 10, 19. " Bloody Brook," 32, 67, 135, 136, 139, 189, 346 Blue Point, 329-331. Boston, 4, 6, 9, 11, 21- 24, 27, 29, 33, 34, 37, 40, 41, 47, 48, 50-52, 54, 55, 58-66, 74, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 87-92, 94-97, 101, 103, 105, 106,108,109, 115,117, 123-125, 128, 129,134, 138, 146, 147, 149, 153, 156, 158-160, 169, 173, 175, 193, 197, 198, 200, 205, 206,209,211, 212, 215, 216, 219, 220, 223, 226, 228, 232-234, 237, 239, 244, 245, 247-251, 254-256, 261, 263, 269, 272, 274, 278-281, 289, 291-293, 296, 301, 306, 307, 309-312, 315, 316, 318, 319, 323, 325, 328- 335,340,352,355,370, 380, 381, 387, 389, 391, 394, 396-398,401,403, 405, 409, 410, 417, 430, 431,439,469-472. Boxford, 420, 424. Bradford, 303, 369, 420, 424. Braintree, 47, 161-163, 221,247,251,281,367, 404, 430, 433, 447, 473. Brant ord, 159. Bridge-water, 255, 256, 385,428,456, 460. Bristol, 25, 84,173,279, 427. Brookfleld, 29-31, 34, 38, 42, 57, 66, 67, 75, 97, 98, 101-107, 109- 123, 127, 128, 131, 133, 134, 189, 229, 235, 266, 2C9, 270, 288, 346, 351, 352, 357, 378, 386, 400, 426. Brookline, 430, 433, 472. Bull s Garrison, 74,153. Burrillville, 37. Butterfield s Meadow, 10. Buxton, 413. C. Cadiz, 469. Cambridge, 47, 80, 84, 106, 117, 124-126, 130, 132, 156, 169, m, 172, 197, 201,258,264,266, 267,269, 278,373,391, 396, 409, 417, 420, 447, 472, 474. " Camp Swamp," 463. Canonicus, 192. Canton, 393. Cape Ann, 167. Cape Cod, 1, 198. Cape Elizabeth, 313. Cape Neddick, 322. Cape Newaggen, 476. Casco, 61, 271, 305, 319, 320,327,328, 330,331, 333, 335, 476. Chabonokong k o m u n (Dudley). Charles River, 3, 4, 24, 398, 400, 404. Charlestown, 22, 37, 47, 74, 87, 99, 116, 117, 125, 130, 132, 156, 213, 228-230, 234, 248, 251, 264,267,269,285,289, 290, 325, 346, 374, 397, 417, 418, 448, 472, 474. Charlton (Charles- town). Chatham, 420, 424. Chelmsford, 53, 56, 66, 67, 99, 108, 114, 115, 121-126, 128, 214, 279, 289,290,300, 301,315, 316, 345,346, 357,373, 393, 397, 399, 404, 434, 448, 474. Chestnut Mountains, 150. Clark s Island, 2. Coasset, 69. Cobbesconte, 263. Cocheco (Dover). Colchester, 251-254, 429. Colraine, 252. Concord, 57, 67, 76, 84, 85, 102, 103, 105, 108, 109, 119, 120, 122, 125, 171, 214, 223, 227-229, 231,253,261,280,299, 346, 352, 354, 355, 373, 396,400,401, 404,405, 434, 435, 437, 438, 448, 472, 474. Connecticut River,6-ll, 16, 37, 57, 121, 128, 134,218,243,305,378, 386, 399. Cura$oa, 61. D. Damerill Cove, 476. Dartmouth, 29, 30, 49, 232, 277, 456, 461. Dedham, 22, 47, 48, 70, 74, 82, 152, 153, 162, 164, 169, 173, 195, 198, 201, 219, 226, 239, 262, 279, 281, 289, 359, 368, 385, 397, 406, 410, 430, 433, 448, 472, 473,477. Deerfield, 32, 37, 42, 43, 67-69, 98, 99, 130, 132, 134, 135, 137, 140, 141, 143, 148, 150, 210, 236, 238, 244, 245, 247, 251- 254, 379, 426. Deer Island, 77,84,354, 397-403. Desert (Mount), 60. Dighton, 428. Dorchester, 4, 9, 11, 18, 26, 47, 48, 56, 09, 78, 84, 94, 161-163, 227, 231, 232, 250, 253, 254, 256, 262, 281,318, 368, 389, 397, 404, 430, 432, 448, 465, 471, 473. Douglas, 386. Dover, 39-41, 271, 293- 295, 297, 299,300, 304- 309, 311, 312, 315-317, 320, 321,397,470. Dudley, 104, 268, 287, 386, 398. Dunstable, 175, 262, 316. 359, 405. Dunstan, 298, 326, 331, 333. Durham, 253, 296. Duxbury, 183, 218, 219, 350, 438, 440, 455, 456, 458. Eastham, 2, 350, 438, 439, 456, 457, 461. Elbows, 251, 254. Eliot, 302. Enfield, 253, 254, 426. Exeter, 181, 296, 308, 342, 448, 469. F. Fairfield, 18, 19, 102, 467. Fall River, 3, 460. "Falltown," 252. Falmouth, 40, 169, 271, 297, 298, 313, 314, 321, 326,420,424.438,476. Farmington, 468. " First Encounter," 2. Flushing, 470. Fort Leverett, 93. Fort Loyal, 169. Four Mile Brook, 131. Framingham, 111, 434. Freetown, 256, 428,476. Fryeburg, 299. G. Glastonbury, 253. Gloucester, 156, 167, 370, 420, 422, 449. Goffstown, 425. Gorham, 438. Grafton, 262, 266, 268, 270, 280, 285, 287, 393, 395,396,398,402,404. Great Island, 475. Greenfield, 245. Green Hill, 230. Greenland, 412. Green River, 37, 245- 247. Greenwich, 425, 426. INDEX OF PLACES. 501 Groton, 16, 22, 35, 53, 66, 99 110, 113-115, 122-125, 214, 262, 269, 278, 320, 359, 360, 434, 474. Guilford, 17, 468. Gyobscot Point, 313. H- Haddam, 253, 429. Hadley, 32, 33, 57, 67- 70,96,98,121,128-132, 134, 135, 137, 138, 140, 142-144, 146, 148, 149, 151, 152, 214, 236,237, 240, 242, 244, 247, 250, 251-253, 258, 259, 266, 270, 282, 289, 292, 296, 351, 361, 426, 475. Hamilton, 282. Hampton, 239, 240,296, 336, 342-344, 370, 412, 449, 476. Hard wick, 425. Hartford, 10, 11, 20-22, 41, 120, 128, 132, 135, 144, 147, 152, 242, 252, 466-468. Hassanamesit (Graf- ton). Hatfield, 35, 37, 43, 68, 69, 71, 115, 129, 130, 139, 143, 144, 148-150, 152,236, 237,241, 243- 247, 250-254, 258, 260, 261, 361, 425, 475. Haverhill, 214, 308, 343, 372,412,413,475. Hebron, 429. Hingham, 47, 138, 161- 163, 221, 226, 276, 280, 281, 283-285, 347, 368, 382, 407, 433, 449, 472, 473. Hiugham (South), 283, 430. Hippocras, 476. Hopkinton, 268, 393, 398, 404. Horseneck, 430. Horsmonden, 119. Hudson River, 470. Hull, 161,163, 258,284, 368, 430, 433. Huntstown, 425. I. Indian Hill, 215. Ipswich, 7, 45, 79, 86, 130, 134, 139, 142, 143, 149, 156, 201, 214, 229, 282,283,370,405,412, 449, 472, 474, 475. J. Jamaica, 59, 396. Jewels Island, 307. K. Kennebec, 40-42, 261, 263, 277, 299, 303-305 312, 320, 328, 335, 338, 345. Killingly, 428. Killingworth, 470. Kingston, 253, 429. Kingston (North), 181 Kingston (South), 33 181, 430. Kingston (West), 184. Kittery, 298, 303, 320 476. L. Lancaster, 34, 53, 56, 66, 67, 84, 97, 99, 110, 114, 120, 121, 123-125, 128, 209,214,220,244,261, 262, 270, 351-355, 378, 385,386, 400,434,474. ebanon, 253, 428, 433. eominster, 355. exington, 434. ieyden, 252. ittle Compton, 182, 427, 461. .ittlo-IJfver, 333. l,ittleton, 393, 396, 434. Condon, 341. ,ong Island, 9, 160, 253, 403, 470. Jongmeadow, 35, 99, 144, 236, 282. Lowell, 300, 346, 393. lUnenberg, 409. Lyme, 266, 272, 468. Lynn, 70, 74, 79, 130, 167,291,371,406,420, 422, 449, 475. M. Maanexit, 104. tfackerel Cove, 133. Siagunkog (Hopkin ton). Maiden, 47, 61, 74, 163, 251-253,276,287, 375, 417, 420, 449, 474, 477. Manchaug, 104. Manchester, 430. Manhattan, 6, 459, 470. Mansfield, 426. Maquoit Bay, 41,313. Marblehead, 68, 74, 130, 166, 167,371,420,421, 450, 475. Marlborough, 34-36, 66-70, 75-77, 85, 94, 97, 99, 105, 110, 114, 115, 117, 123, 125, 139, 143, 159, 205-216, 218- 223, 226-229, 234, 238, 239,254,256,262,268- 270, 285, 351, 352, 361, 381, 382, 393, 396, 400, 402, 404, 434, 450. Marshfield, 30, 35, 87, 349, 429, 455, 456, 458. Marshfield (East), 422. Martha s Vineyard,392. Massachusetts Bay, 4. Mattapoisett, 49, 65, 460. McSparran Hill, 185, 189. Medfield, 34, 53, 54, 84, 85, 97, 99, 124, 226, 234, 235, 239, 244, 284, 347, 362, 369, 401. 404, 430, 434, 450, 473. Medford, 171, 172, 250, 252, 266,375,417,419, 450. Menameset, ) 34,104 Meminimisset, \ 111 112, 128, 235, 349, 352 379, 381, 403. Mendon, 31, 32, 49, 50 54, 55, 66, 67, 70, " 81, 105, 106, 120, 128 161, 205, 262, 267, 287 288, 351, 363. Merrimac, 430. Merrimac Kiver, 120 214, 229, 261, 290, 307 345, 378, 393, 409, 420 Methuen, 412. New Haven, 21, 22,191, Middleborough, 4, 29, 467, 468. 56, 429. tfewichewannock, 302, Middletown, 159, 252, 476. 253, 429. tfew London, 199, 202, Milford, 183, 202, 420, 383,430,434,467,468. 468. ^ew Netherlands, 168. Miller s River, 34. New Plymouth, 226, Milton, 9, 94, 161-163, 392. 219,221,284, 369,404, Newport, 233, 234, 255, 430, 432, 450. 256, 385, 430, 434. "Mistick," 16,471. New Roxbury, 159. ilonhegan, 476. Newton, 184, 251,252, Mount Hope, 3, 25, 28- 391, 408, 417,419,472. 30, 39, 45, 48, 63-66, New Warwick, 392. 77, 80, 84, 85, 87, 90, Now York, 41, 43, 149, 91,93, 95,96, 104,128, 168, 200, 346, 390, 391. 159,188, 194, 205,262, tfiantick, 31. 263, 277, 282, 288, 380, Nipsachick, 31, 462. 386-388, 393-395, 462. Nobscot," 227. ilount Vernon, 420. Noddle s Island, 233, Mt. Adams, 245. 234. " Muddy-Brook," 135, Nonacoicus, 120, 123. 136, 140. Nonantum, 391, 404. Huddy River, 404. Northampton, 33, 35, Munjoy s Island, 61, 98, 129, 130, 135, 143, 321, 322. 144,148-150, 152,235- tfuscongus, 61. 238, 243, 247, 250-253, Cystic River, 4. 350, 364, 426, 475. Northboro, 269. N. Northfield, 32, 96, 98, Namkeake, 404. 121, 129-132, 134-136, Nantucket, 60, 392. 139,143, 148,266, 378. Narraganset, 11, 12,16, Norwalk, 468. 27, 28, 57, 65, 70, 73- Norwich, 21, 31, 107, 75, 85, 123, 136, 140, 392, 426, 441, 465, 468. 152, 154, 156, 158, 159, 161,164,165,173,185, 0. 189, 190, 195, 196, 199, Dborne (Woburn). 200,201,204,206,207, Ognonikongqua- ) 004 219,259, 262,264,269, mesit, 277,289,291,305,343, Okkokonimesit, ) *** 384,399,407,409,421, Ossipee, 40, 271, 299, 425. 303, 310, 320, 323. Narraganset Bay, 3, 22, Oxford, 386, 426. 24. Oyster Bay, 470, Narraganset, No. 1 Oyster River, 296, 297. (Buxton, Me.), 412, 413-416. P. Narraganset, No. 2 Pakachoog, 104, 267, (Westminster, Mass.), 268, 287, 386. 409, 417-420. Paquatucke, 23. Narraganset, No. 3 Paquayag, 98, 130, 235. (Amherst,N.H.),409, Patuxit, 3, 192, 204. 420-424. Patuxit River, 35, 36, Narraganset, No. 4 153. (Greenwich, Mass.), Pawcatuck River, 12, 425-430, 463. 23, 262. Narraganset, No. 5 Pawtucket, 3, 299, 346, (Bedford, etc., N.H.), 349, 383. 430-434. Pegunkugg (Deer- Narraganset, No. 6 field). (Templeton, Mass.), Peggwakick, 320, 321 435-438. Pemaquid, 40, 41, 43, Narraganset, No. 7 310, 313, 476. (Gorham.Me.), 438- Pembroke, 429. 441, 464. Pennacook, 53, 67, 71, Nashaway, ) 57, 66,262, 123, 2U4, 295, 300, 301, Nashua, ( 270. 313, 316, 399, 400. Nashoba (Littleton). Penobscot, 40, 299, 301, Natick, 26, 80, 104, 105, 310, 311, 313,314. 267, 268, 270, 311,344, Pequaket, 272, 303. 391, 393, 394,396,398 Pequod Harbor, 9, 10, 404, 405. 16, 17. Needhara, 430, 433. Pequod River, 6, 15, 17. Nemasket, 4, 26. Pequot Hill, 16. Nemeacke, ) no Pesurapscot River, 412, Naweacke, ( 438. Nequamkeek, 263. Petasquamscot, ( 74, 82, New Braintree, 96, 111 "Tower Hill," \ 153, Newbury, 79, 86, 130 185, 189, 193. 136, 139, 156, 206, 249 Piscataqua, 158, 271, 278,316,318,342,371 299, 303, 304, 308, 316, 412, 450, 472, 475. 327, 328, 338, 345, 385. 502 KING PHILIP S WAR. Plimpton, 429. Plymouth, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 24-27, 35, 38, 77, 87-89, 97, 104, 152- 154, 187,190,191,193, 195-199, 204, 205, 226, 291,299, 319,336,3*7, 348,386,387,394,407, 411,438,440,442,455- 459, 461. Plymouth Bay, 1-3, 85. Pocasset, 28-31, 39, 48- 50, 58, 65, 80, 93, 95, 105,112,377,380,387, 462. Pokanoket, 4, 25, 386. Pore fret, 427. Portland, 313. Port Royal, 133. Portsmouth, 40, 294, 297, 299,303,308,311, 312, 317, 336, 337, 475. Princeton, 354. Providence, 12, 22, 30, 31, 35, 49, 50, 73, 88, 99, 153, 202-205, 236, 348-350, 382, 434. " Providence Isle," 19, 95, 430. Provincetown Harbor, 3. Pulling Point, 276, 401. Punckapog, 80, 226, 364,393,396, 404. Punketecs Neck, 462. Q- Quabaug, 31, 66, 77, 99, 104, 105, 111,116,118, 137,205,211,235,240, 258,349,357,381,450. Quabbin, 425. "Quansigamond Poud," 47, 57, 94, 104, 270. Quantisset, 104. Quawpaug, 203, 204. Queen s Fort, 181. Quiunipiack (New Haven) . R. Raynham, 461. Reading, 156, 171, 172, 258,259, 276,375,406, 407,417,420,424,450, 474. " Redemption Rock," 354. Rehoboth, 30, 49, 60, 53, 65, 80, 91, 94, 95, 99, 263, 349, 350, 378, 382, 386,427,456,459, 462, 463. Rhode Island, 3, 24, 74, 84, 87, 163, 185, 190, 191, 194, 196, 198, 204, 289, 291, 461. Rochester, 256, 429. Rowley, 79, 130, 142, 156, 201, 206, 371,412, 450, 474. Roxbury, IS, 47, 53, 54, 56, 80, 117, 130, 159, 161-163, 195,211,226, 231, 247, 250,253,262, 281,289,369,389,430, 432, 450, 471, 473. Rumney Marsh, 85, 276, 450. Rutland, 111, 409. Rye, 468. Sachem s Head, 17. Saco, 178, 297-299, 301, 325, 326, 330, 331, 333, 334, 337, 345, 412, 476. Sagadahoc, 170,200,476. Salem, 6, 18, 74,79,128, 133, 134, 137, 138, 164, 166-168, 247, 277, 291, 311, 312, 318, 319, 346, 371,407,420,421,424, 451,453,472,475. Salisbury, 336, 412,451, 476. Salmon Falls, 296, 302. Sandwich, 350, 438, 440, 456, 458. Sauford, 178. Saugus, 472. " Saw-Mill Brook," 32, 131. Saybrook, 10, 184, 465, 466, 468. Saybrook Fort, 8,9,11, 16. Scarboro, 297, 298, 326, 329,333,351,420,424, 476. Scattercook, 200. Scituate, 255, 256, 347, 349, 385,387,430,434, 438, 440, 455-458, 464. Scottoway s Hill, 325. Seconet, 29. Seekonk, I 35, 49, 50, Secuucke, \ 73,90,99, 153, 192, 226, 262, 348, 459. Sepecan, 463. Shawmut, 4. Shawomet, 384, 463. Shawshin, 405. Smead s Island, 243. Sherborn, 434. Smith s Garrison, 73, 75,153,199,201. Souhegan (East), 430. Souhegan River, 409, 420, 421. Southboro, 220, 434. Southampton, 250. Sowamset, ) Sowams, j Springfield, 32, 33, 35, 41, 66, 68, 69, 99, 112, 120, 121, 128,134,144, 145, 148, 151, 152, 210, 236-238, 243,247,250- 254, 266, 268, 282, 288, 365, 475. Squakheage, ) 96, 131, Squakeag, \ 132,147. Spurwink River, 325, 333. Stafford, 254. Waterboro, 178. Stamford, 254, 468, 470. Waterbury, 253. St. John, 61, 133. Watertown, 7, 11, 32, Stoneham, 434. 36, 47, 74, 117, 120, Stonington, 23, 194, 199, 124, 127, 128, 132, 169, 383, 441, 442,462,465, 171,214, 223,227,228, 468. 230,231, 250,252,267, Stoughton, 430, 433. 269, 278, 375,405,417, Stow, 102, 434. 418,451,470,472,474. Stratford, 183, 468. Webster, 386. Strickland s Plain, 470. Wells, 42, 271, 278, 291, Sturgeon Creek, 302, 298, 308, 310, 320, 322, 303. 323, 336,343,344,351, Sudbury, 36, 42, 56, 74- 476. 76, 84, 97, 106, 108, Wenham, 156, 167, 311, 116, 117, 125, 126, 172, 372, 420, 423, 451. 206, 207,213-216,218, Wenimesset, j QA _ Qa 222-231, 268, 269, 285, Wenameset, j yfr 290, 292, 346, 382, 417, Wequapeuge, 23. 419,451,474. Wequomps (Mt.), 32, Suffleld, 253, 254, 426. 129. Sugar-Loaf Hill, 129, Wessaguscus (Wey- 266. mouth). Surinam, 319. Westerly, 202. Button, 386. Westfield, 98, 137, 145, Swamp-Fort, 74. 150-152, 236, 250, 253, Swansey, 27, 30, 46, 48, 254, 292, 475. 65, 80, 87-92, 251, 253, Westford, 251, 253. 255-257, 295, 427, 460, Westminster, 409, 417, 463. 420. Swift River, 128. Weston, 417,419. Wethersfield.10,11,13, T. 146, 252, 466-468. Taunton, 30, 49, 87, 89, Weymouth, 4, 5, 47, 93, 261, 387,455, 456, 161-163, 168, 221 , 226, 459-461, 463. 247, 280, 281, 284, 287, Templeton, 434, 435. 347, 369, 382, 430, 433, Tewsbury, 253. 451, 471-473. Tinker s Island, 175. Weymouth (North), Tisbury,438. 178. Tlverton, 28, 58. Whately, 129. Topsfield, 167, 372, 420, Whipsuppenick, 208. 423, 451. Wickabaug Pond, 111. Tripp s Ferry, 387. Wickford, 33, 73, 75, Turner s Falls, 247. 82, 153, 164, 173, 185, 188-191, 204, 205, 381. U. Windham, 250, 252, " Unqnowa," 18. 427. Uxbtidge, 48. Windsor, 10, 11, 130, 144, 465-468. V. Winnepesaukee, 120. Voluntown, 198, 441, Winter Harbor, 320, 442, 444. 322, 333, 343. Woburn, 80, 82, 117, W. 156, 171, 172, 249, 251, Wabaquasset, 104, 152, 346, 376, 434, 436, 451, 205. 474. " Wachusett Hill," 34- Wollaston, 59. 36,57,96,98,101,109, " Woodcock s Garri 124,218,235,270,325, son," 48, 51, 65, 73, 354,386, 395,409,417. 153, 159, 160, 226, 263, Wading River, 366. 366. Wakefield, 258. Woodstock, 159, 205, Waldingfteld, 142. 426. Walliugford, 199, 253, Worcester, 47, 48, 104, 468. 247,249,251, 268,354, Walpole, 430. 386, 426. Wamesit, 214, 262, 393, Wrentham, 81,366, 430. 396, 404. Wapososhequash, 31, Y. 50. Yarmouth, 350, 438, Warwick, 20, 35, 82, 439, 455, 456. 192, 200, 204, 348, 381, York, 294, 298, 308, 384. 322, 338, 343, 344, 420, Washakom, 57,270,386. 424, 476. RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY Bldg. 400, Richmond Field Station University of California Richmond, CA 94804-4698 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 2-month loans may be renewed by calling (510) 642-6753 1-year loans may be recharged by bringing books to NRLF Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due date DUE AS STAMPED BELOW N 2 6 1996 IAY ;; CIRCULATION DEP pi 2 6 7nm SEP Z 1 2001 20,000 (4/94) BERKELEY LIBRARIES