Trouhlou. Times. ^mi i-f '*J A % n^ ^^ Troublous Times; OR, Leaves from the Note-Book of the Rev. Mr. John Hicks, an ejefted Nonconformift Minifter, 1670 — ^71. ^ TRANSCRIBED BY JANE BOWRTNG CRANCH, With an IntroduSIion by the REV. CHARLES STANFORD Cnn.— " Tf you will go with us. you must go airainst wind and tide ; you must also own religion in his rags, as well as when in his silver slippers ; and stand by him, too, when bound in irons, as well as when he walketh the streets with applause "—i'iiyrim'g Prugrnas, I'urt I. yackfon^ JValforrl^ &^ Hoddei\ 18, ST. PAUL'S CHURCHYARD. MDCCCLXII. «i. UKWIN, GUESnAM 8TEAM PKESS BUCKLERSBURT, E.C. Introdudlion. &^ H I S is a story of old Puritan life. The scene Is the little town of Kingsbridge, situated in the extreme south of Devon. Just after the A61 of Uniformity had become the law of the land, this place was the abode of several ejedled ministers — " men of whom the world was not worthy." Mr. Tooker occupied a small farm at Norden, nearly a third of a mile distant, Mr. Burdwood rented land about four miles out in the country, at Batson, a village noted for its orchards. In the town itself, dwelt Mr. John Hicks, Mr. Jellinger, and Mr. Quicke, some- time vicar of the parish. Here, also, the learned Mr. George Hughes ended his days. The church is adorned by " a fair marble monument," which one of his rich friends eredled to his memory, and which bears a Latin inscription, from the pen of his son- in-law, Mr. John Howe, VI INTRODUCTION. From family traditions, as well as from standard biographies, the lady to whom we are indebted for these chapters, has colle6ted many interesting notices of our Kingsbridge worthies, and woven the various threads of information thus obtained into a graceful but unpretending narrative. Though in the form of fidion, every leading incident is a well-authenti- cated fadt. Even the imaginary conversations convey the real sentiments, and are alive with the very spirit of the fathers who are thus represented. This we know from their writings. Perhaps we may at first be inclined to think that the style for which Mr. Hicks is made answerable, had become somewhat out of date by the time when his " Notes" are assumed to have been written ; but this thought is checked when we remember that a certain antique simplicity of speech, and many quaint fashions of address, lingered in the remote country towns long after they had dropped out of use in the rest of the world. The chief personage in the company to which v/e are introduced is Mr. John Hicks. In 1662, while measures were under discussion in high places, with a view to the firmer establishment of the national religion, he waited, with much concern, for the result. He was then a young clergyman, a true Puritan as to his faith, but holding what would now be called moderate opinions on ecclesiastical questions; and professing himself willing to continue INTRODUCTION. vii his ministry in the Church of England, if a few sHght alterations were made in its forms, and if he should only be required to submit to its ancient terms of subscription. It was, therefore, a bitter disappointment to find, on the publication of the Bartholomew A<5t, that it was designed to operate as a highly penal measure ; that the Prayer Book had only been altered in order to make it impossible for the Puritans to accept it ; and that, still further, every Anglican clergyman was required to declare his unfeigned assent and consent to all and every thing the book contained, on pain of exclusion from his office. One day, when in conversation with an old University friend, who was trying to persuade him to conform, " I do believe," said he, " that these conditions are only designed and contrived on purpose to prevent our public preaching, and to keep us out of the Church." To which his friend replied, with much simplicity, " I judge that it is so, for a bishop in Ireland, whose name I have forgotten, told me the very same." His final thoughts on the subjed are thus expressed in his own language : — " The terms of the particular law made in 1662, were not only new, but so strid and severe, that I could never have satisfadtion in my own conscience, after all endeavours used for a compliance therewith, and a conformity thereto. . . . The giving assent b 2 VIU INTRO DUCT ION. and consent has been too hard and difficult for me to comply with." He therefore gave up his benefice, and came with his wife and children to Kings- bridge. We should like to know more of that young wife. She was " Mistress Howe" when he first met with her, and perhaps some future research may show that she was related to a certain friend and neighbour of his — the writer of " The Living Temple." All we know of her is, that she shared her husband's convictions, and helped him cheerfully to bear his cross. How he and his family fared for the next nine years will be seen in these pages. The account breaks off abruptly, when it reaches the year 167 1, just as Mr. Hicks seems about to enter upon a new series of adventures. Up to this point, the fadls of his life are faithfully reported, and so interesting are they, that every reader will wish to learn the particulars of his subsequent career. If, as the transcriber relates, and as local tradition seems to indicate, he entertained at this time the idea of emigration to New England, some circumstance, now unknown, occurring at the last moment, must have hindered him from carrying his plan into effedl, for we find him almost immediately afterwards taking part in public transactions. In 1672 he was deputed, by a large number of gentlemen and others in the west of England, to present, in their name, an address of thanks to the King, for the indulgence which he had just granted to the Non- INTRODUCTION. IX conformists. A few months later, a vote of the Commons set aside this indulgence as an illegal exercise of the prerogative, and troubles for con- science' sake were renewed with more than their former severity. In consequence of this change, Mr. Hicks left Kingsbridge, and became the minister of a congregation at Portsmouth. While he was there, Calamy informs us that a visit was paid to the town by the King ; that the governor, principal officers, and many of the inhabitants, went to Portsdown to meet him ; and that Mr. Hicks, who was one of the company, was honoured by the King's especial notice. It does not appear, how- ever, that this momentary flash of light from the royal countenance had any effedl in dispersing the gloom of his lot, for we learn that, shortly after, persecution again compelled him to leave his home. What was his next dwelling-place is now uncertain, but his last is ascertained from an old indictment, in which he is described as " John Hicks, clerk, of Keynsham, near Bristol." He seems to have suffered even more than his companions from the trials of the times. For this he sometimes had reason to blame himself. It has often been remarked that every strong element in character is in danger of filling more than its due place, and of becoming error by excess. It was thus with him. He was generous, frank, and daring to a fault ; apt to feel quickly, speak plainly. INTRODUCTION. and aft with headlong haste. On one occasion, when a warrant was out against him from the Kingsbridge justices for preaching without sandlion of law, and two messengers, speaking vain-glorious and uncivil things, came to take him in charge, he did, to their great surprise, lift his cane, and after a few words of exhortation touching the right govern- ment of the tongue, proceeded to chastise them both full soundly. At their particular request, he then granted them his pardon, and departed, leaving each dignitary to find his way home, as best he might; there to tell, if it so pleased him, that he had that very night been " robbed, murdered, and likewise put in fears of his life." A mild and charitable version of this affair will be found in the "Note-book" — just the kind of account that we should expedt from the good man himself; but it is mentioned now, partly as an illustration of his high spirit, and partly because we suspeft that this adventure with the constables caused much of the vexation that troubled him for the rest of his days. In their sacred persons, both Church and State had been grievously insulted. It was a grave offence thus to defy the executive power of the law, and though the offender at once hastened up to London, made a full confession to his Majesty, and obtained his gracious absolution, the deed was never forgiven or forgotten by his ill- wishers in the country. They soon set afloat the most extravagant stories to his disadvantage. He INTRODUCTION. XI was a conspirator ; he was a fifth-monarchy man ; he was a Baptist ; he had assisted Colonel Blood to steal the regalia from the Tower ; he, with the colonel and two other desperadoes, had rescued an officer, named Mason, from eight soldiers who were conveying him from London to take his trial at the York assizes, for a share in the great northern plot ; he had shot a poor traveller who was journeying for protecflion with that valorous guard ; he had been concerned with Lord Russell and others in treason- able praftices. Of course, all these reports were the wildest fabrications, but the one well-known instance of his reckless adtion seemed to give them a colour of probability. They answered their intended effedl — -they furnished the magistrates with a pretext for giving him every possible annoyance, and his persecution from place to place was doubtless owing in a large measure to the prejudice they created against him. Henceforth, he was a mark for malice, and ^' the archers wounded him sorely." Even his old friends became shy in their carriage towards him ; many a discreet Nonconformist, who was trying by strokes of cautious and skilful expediency to steer his own way through " troublous times," watched him with much apprehension, and many a meek recluse besides, felt safest out of his company. At length, hurried on by the impulses of his ardent nature, in 1685 he became a volunteer in Xll INTRODUCTION. the army of the Duke of Monmouth, who was then making his desperate attempt to grasp the Crown. Strange as it may seem, however, Mr. Hicks never lost the loyal spirit which is rightly ascribed to him in these pages. This rash engage- ment was consistent with the most romantic theories respecting the fidelity due from a subjed: to his prince. To the very last he held it to be *' unlawful, under any pretence whatever, to take up arms against the rightful sovereign ;" but, un- happily, he was deceived into the belief that the Duke of Monmouth was his " rightful sovereign." Convinced that he was the legitimate heir to King Charles, kept out of his rights by a vile conspiracy, he judged that if he had not followed the Duke's standard, he " would not have been clear from the sin of rebellion." "This," he assures us, "along with a vigorous and vehement zeal for the Pro- testant religion," alone prompted him to take the course upon which he decided. Zeal for the Protestant religion was the grand motive to the rising in the West. This rising has been called "the Dissenting Rebellion," but it should rather be regarded as the last struggle and outburst of the old historical Puritanism. The special opinions of Nonconformists as to Church or State had nothing to do with it. Dissenters formed the majority of Monmouth's adherents, but only because they were in pre-eminence the true Puritans, INTRODUCTION. Xlll and therefore the true Protestants of the day. To all appearance, Popery was about to ruin Eng- land for ever, and these men rose, resolved, if possible, to avert the dread calamity. They were mistaken in their line of adlion, mistaken in their choice of a leader, still more mistaken in striving to win a spiritual victory by carnal force. But they were not mistaken in their estimate of the evil they meant to resist, or of the good they meant to fight for. The sin of their enterprise consisted in the use of wrong means to accomplish right ends ; but they had no suspicion that the means they used were wrong. Multitudes were led astray by the very passion and enthusiasm of their concern for the interests of truth and righteous- ness. It was a high-souled infatuation, and we may almost say " the light that led astray was light from heaven." On the 6th of July, as the result of the adlion at Sedgemoor, the cause was lost. Sorrowful words were written in some of the old Dissenting church-books, in memory of brethren who had perished on that day. One such document, which is still preserved, concludes in this language : — " Thus these mighty men who had potency with God, and jeopardized their lives in the high places of the field for the cause of Christ, fell in the midst of battle." Two days after the battle, Monmouth was tracked to his last sad hiding-place XIV INTRODUCTION. amongst the fern. Every day multitudes of fugitives were found and reserved for a dreadful fate. Mr. Hicks escaped, and contrived to remain in concealment for about three weeks. At the end of this time, having reached Warminster, he despatched a person on a journey of twenty-six miles, to the house of Lady L'IsIe, to ask her if she would grant an asylum to him and Mr. Richard Nelthorpe, an attorney, who was his companion. According to the messenger, her reply was, " She did not know but that she might." After consideration, she desired them to come on Tuesday night, the 30th of July. In this way she had sheltered many a royalist soldier in the Civil Wars, and many a hunted minister since. Mr. Hicks could not be aware that she was now incurring any greater risk than on former occasions. He had not yet been convided of any political offence ; his name was not in any proclama- tion. She doubtless knew the nature of his danger, although, from wise forethoup;ht, in case of any future questioning, both she and the messenger had avoided any dired allusion to it. At the hour appointed, therefore, he and Nelthorpe, " booted and spurred," arrived at her gates. To prevent any possibility of mistake, Mr. Hicks at once told her all the circumstances in explicit language. It was now out of her power to say, in the event of any legal inquiry, that she had not been told who her INTRODUCTION. XV guests were. It might now prove a dangerous thing to give them shelter, and, as the best thing that could be done, she sent her bailiff to a magis- trate with information of their arrival, contriving facilities for their escape in the interval. For the last two days, however, treachery had been at work. Colonel Penruddock had been made acquainted with the whole of the original plan of flight. He could easily have taken both vidims on their way, but he afterwards told Lady L'Isle that he only waited until she, too, was in his power. Her late husband had been one of Crom- well's lords. In defence of his own government, Cromwell had been a terrible scourge to the Colonel's family ; hence he felt fierce hatred towards any person who had in any way been associated with that hated name. A few hours after the two fugitives had been watched into the house, they were taken by Penruddock's soldiers, and their benefadress was arrested at the same time. At the close of August, the lady was brought to Winches- ter, to answer for the capital crime of harbouring traitors. " The imaginary trial of Faithful," says a famous essayist, " before a jury composed of the personified Vices, was just and merciful compared with the real trial of Alice L'Isle before that tribunal where all the Vices sat in the person of Jefferies." She was infirm with extreme age, she had passed her life in deeds of piety and kindness, XVI INTRODUCTION. even the prejudiced Tory gentry all held her in high esteem, and her poor neighbours regarded her with an enthusiasm of admiring love ; but the laughing, shouting, cursing Judge was so bent on her destruction, that he strained the law to effedt it, and on the second day of the trial gave directions that Alice L'Isle should be burned alive that very afternoon. The sentence was afterwards commuted from burning to beheading, and the execution was put off five days. All this time Mr. Hicks was a prisoner at Salisbury, " grievously afflided," as he says, by the fate of his generous friend. He was brought to Dorchester for trial, and on the fourth of Septem- ber was sentenced to die. Some of his friends rode up to Whitehall, and sought an interview with the King to pray for a mitigation of the sentence. They found, on their arrival, that the adverse party, probably expecting that this step would be taken, had already been eagerly at work there to inflame the feeling that existed against him. It had been said, that he was the very person who had urged Monmouth to take the title of King, although it was known that he had not even seen the Duke, until some days after that proclamation had been made. It had been said, that he had been seen at a certain time riding about in the western counties, to enlist volunteers for the rebel army, although it was known that he was at that very INTRODUCTION. XVII time in a distant part of the kingdom. Un- happily, the King was in the mood for believing all that could be said to the prisoner's disadvantage. Still there was hope. Something might yet be done for their friend by the influence of his younger brother. Dr. George Hicks, the Dean of Wor- cester. To understand the value attached to this gentleman's good word, we must here introduce a short account of him. Since the opening of Charles the Second's reign, the time when he left the University, he had been the stout advocate of all popular dodrines. He was a high Churchman, and a sound Royalist. "The King," said he, " hath his authority inherently, not from his electors, but from God, even as Christ is head of His church." In one of his later pamphlets, he laboured to prove that if King James should " be pleased to massacre all his troops, as Maximian had massacred the Theban legion, it would be their duty to pile their arms, and meekly to receive the crown of martyrdom." It is but fair to say, that these appear to have been his genuine con- vi6lions, and it is pleasing to add, that he had hitherto suffered no inconvenience through holding them. Conscience had only allured him into paths of peace, and virtue had met with its full reward. First he went to Scotland as a chaplain to the Duke ofLauderdale, patron of orthodoxy, and prince of pro- ficients in the art of using the chain, the rack, and XVlll INTRODUCTION. the thumbscrew, for the advancement of religion. Next, he was distinguished by receiving pubhc praise from Archbishop Sharpe. The University of St. Andrews, and afterwards that of Oxford, created him Dodor of Divinity, the honour being accom- panied in each instance by acknowledgments of the remarkable services he had rendered to the Church of England. He was appointed Chaplain in Ordinary to his Majesty, became Vicar of All Hallows, Barking, and was at last rewarded by promotion to a Deanery. If any effedlual inter- cessor could have been found for the hapless prisoner, this was the man. No other person had a chance of success. Sad to say, bigotry had petrified natural affection ; and when he was implored to speak for his brother, he replied, " I will never speak for a fanatic,"* The prisoner's fate was sealed. * Dr. George Hicks was well versed in primitive Christian litera- ture, and was, besides, the best Teutonic scholar of his day. His fame now rests on this basis, but in his lifetime he was chiefly renowned for the energy and controversial skill with which he defended the doftrines of "divine right and passive obedience." Whatever considerations might have first influenced him in the adoption of these tenets, he became a thorough believer in them. The best proof of this appeared in his refusal to take the oath of allegiance to William and Mary, for which refusal he was deprived of all his ecclesiastical honours. Most of the cler^-y who had taken the place of the ejeded ministers, and the great majority of the rest, held the same opinions as a most sacred part of their religion. From their loud and devout advocacy of them, it might have been expefted that considerably more than " two tliou'