<>^ /- ^^ •30 \' S^# LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Received %JihCi0.^i88c:'' Accessions No. -^y^^^ Slielf No. os- •30 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/christothermasteOOhardrich CHRIST AND OTHER MASTERS: AN HISTORICAL INQUIRY INTO SOME OF THE CHIEF PARALLELISMS AND CONTRASTS BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY KELIGIOTJS SYSTEMS OF THE ANCIENT WOKLD, CHARLES HARDWICK, M.A. LATE ARCHDEACON OP ELY, AND CHRISTIAN ADVOCATE IN THE UNIVERSITY OP CAMBRIDGE. FOUKTH EDITION, EDITE&vBY J^RANCIS PROCTE^jj VICAR OP 'WITTON, NORFOLK; FORMERLY FELLOW OP ST Catharine's college, Cambridge. " Are not Abana and Pharpar, rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? May I not wash in them and be clean? So he turned, and went away in a rage."— 2 Kings v. 12. Honaon : MACMILLAN AND CO. 1882. [All Rights reserved,] C •I have laid it down as an invariable maxim constantly to follow historical tradition, and to hold' fast by that clue, even when many things, in the testimony and declarations of tradition, appear strange and ahnost inexpHcable, or at least enigmatical; for so soon as in the investigation of ancient history we let slip that thread of Ai-iadne, we can find no outlet from the labyrinth of fanciful theories, and the chaos of clashing opinions.'— F. von Schlegel, Phil of Hist p. 8i, Lond. 1847. ^y^^y CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY C. J. CLl^Ff^ZIT^raE UNIVERSITY PRESS. PREFATORY MEMOIR TO SECOND EDITION. The present work contains tlie four Essays published by the late Archdeacon Hardwick in the years in which he held the office of * Christian Advocate ' in the University of Cambridge. It is simply a reprint of the first edition, with the introduction of a few notes from the author's manuscript. The central point, around which his whole argument is constructed, is the exhibition of the real position and relation of Christianity in the presence of the other religions, which have had, and still have, the allegiance of so great a part of mankind. It was his intention, in a concluding volume, to discuss these religions as one great whole, and to determine the place of the present argument among our Christian defences and evidences ; and to analyse more minutely the causes which rendered heathen systems so ineffective, and which led in so many instances to their rapid deterioration. He felt, however, that this was too much to undertake in one year. His publication therefore for the fifth and concluding year of his office as the last * Christian Advocate * was intended to be a discussion of the genuineness of the Second Epistle of St. Petei', which had formed the subject of a Latin Thesis composed for his B.D. degree; and a few pages of this treatise were in type, when it, and the conclusion of the present elaborate work, and whatever else was occupying his ever-active mind, was cut short by a death regretted not only by a circle of private friends, but by all admirers of a sound and reasonable churchmanship. * 6 2 vi Prefatory Memoir, To those who were acquainted with the Author in the University, his character of patient labour must be well known. To reckon simply the years, from 1845, when he was elected to a Fellowship, to the year of his death, 1859, and to com- pare this period with the number of books written and edited in the interval, will satisfy any one that there could have been but few idle days. But a more intimate acquaintance with his early life causes the greater wonder at the learning which produced these works. A slip of paper written during his undergraduateship, gives the particulars of his previous educational course, which would be hardly credited, if the story rested upon accounts picked up from hearsay evidence. Charles Hard wick was born September 22, 1821, at Slingsby, in the North Riding of Yorkshire. He received the first rudiments of English, writing and arithmetic, under Mr. Chapman, the schoolmaster in his native village, who survived his pupil by a few weeks. He was taught also the Latin Grammar by the Rev. Wm. Walker, at that time the Curate, and who afterwards held the Rectory of Slingsby. At the age of twelve, in 1833, he was sent to a school at Malton, kept by Mr. P. Corcoran, a Socinian minister, who is described as being a clever man. Here he began Greek : he did not, however, remain long under his teaching, but was sent to the Grammar School at Sheffield, where some relatives resided. Here again he only remained for one year : weak health compelled his removal home, and kept him there for six or eight months — studying : entering upon a course of self-education : preparing to obtain learning in the only way that seemed open to him, by assisting in teaching others. At the age of fifteen he was taken by Mr. Irving, on the recommendation of his friend Mr. Walker, as pupil and assistant in the Thornton Grammar School near Pickering ; and he was there for eighteen months. In the summer of 1838, while not yet seventeen, he removed to the academy at Malton, where he was assistant classical Tutor under Mr. Marshall. Here he remained for eighteen months. While in this situation, he delivered two lectures at the Prefatory Memoir, vii Mechanics' Institute ; and some of liis youthfal essays in Poetiy were published in the Poet's Corner of the York Courant. A longer specimen of his talents in this department, in the shape of a sacred drama, was sent to Lord Carlisle through Mr. Walker, his lordship's chaplain; and this brought the youth a sovereign, and a word of encouragement. He continued to write poetry — sonnets and longer pieces — in his next situ- ation; when he was engaged as assistant by the Kev. H. Barlow, who took pupils at Shirland Rectory, in Derbyshire. Here he enjoyed a salary of £40 a-year. But it does not appear that he was there for a full year — at all events not more than a year. He brought home a half-year's stipend, which enabled him to pay his Caution money. In July 1840, he was entered for a sizarship at St. John's, but was unsuccessful at the examination in October. He then entered as a pensioner at Catharine Hall, and obtained a small scholarship after the College examination in the Easter Term in 1841. The remainder of his undergraduate course is soon told. The hardworking youth was chiefly maintained by his scholarship, with helps that are obtainable in the University, and for which so steady a student could be safely recommended by Professor Corrie, the tutor of the College. He had also an exhibition (Lady Lumley's) of XI 5 for three years, from the Thornton Grammar School. This fact intimates that he was at that school as a scholar; or if he united the positions of teacher and scholar, he was sufficiently recognised in the latter capacity to be considered a member of the school. In the examination at the end of his second year (1842) he was Prizeman in Divinity, 1st in classics, and 2nd hi Mathematics. At the B.A. examination, in January 1844, he stood first Senior Optime. Self-maintenance and self-improvement were still the rules of his working life. By the assistance of Professor Corrie, he soon became tutor in the family of Sir Joseph Badcliffe, then residing at Brussels. Here he used the opportunities open viii Prefatory Memoir. to him, and made himself master of French and German. He was unsuccessful in an examination for a Yorkshire Fellowship in the October Term of 1844: but nothing daunted, he con- tinued his work with his pupils, and improved himself so far that he was elected in 1845. He was now free to choose his own line of reading. His Fellowship giving him a title for orders, he was ordained Deacon in 1846, and Priest in 1847, in which year he proceeded to his M.A. degree. In September, 1846, he received the thanks of the parishioners of All Saints, Cambridge, for duty done during the absence of the Vicar, the Kev. George Maddison. During this year, 1846, he was engaged, for the University Press, upon the new edition of Sir Koger Twysden's Historical Vindication of the Church of England in point of Schism, as it stands separated from the Roman, and was reformed V^ Elizabeth; and found the additional matter introduced into this edition, in Twysden's autograph, in an interleaved copy in the Library of the British Museum. As a Supplement to this work, he was induced to edit Arch- deacon Fullwood's lloma Euit, or the Pillars of Rome broken : Cambridge, 1847. He also completed, for the University Press, the edition of the Saxon and Northumbrian versions of St. Matthew's Gospel (1848), commenced by the late Mr. John M. Kemble. His next work was an edition, for the Percy Society, of A Poem on the Times of Edward II. (1849), followed by an Anglo-Saxon Passion of St. George (1850) ; undertaken while engaged on the Catalogue of MSS. in the Cambridge University Library, of which Mr. Hardwick was appointed to be editor in chief, and to which he contributed the descriptions of the volumes of Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-lSTorman, and Early English literature. In 1849, also, he read before the Cambridge Anti- quarian Society, An Historical Enquiry touching St. CatJiarine of Alexandria; which ^as printed with the addition of a Semi- Saxon Legend, and Glossary. (Cambridge, 1849.) In 1850, he assisted in preparing an edition of the Book Prefatory Memoir, ix of Homilies for the University Press, under the supervision of Professor Corrie, who fairly * thanks his friend and former pupil for verifying a large proportion of the quotations from Scripture and ecclesiastical writers, and for his valuable aid in correcting the press and supplying an index.' In December of this year he preached a course of sermons at Great St. Mary's, on the Connection of the Old and New Testaments. In March of the year 1851, he was appointed by the Bishop of London (C. J. Blomfield) to be the Cambridge preacher at the Chapel Eoyal, Whitehall. He had at this time just com- pleted his History of the Articles of Religion, An American edition of this work, of course without the author's sanction, was printed at Philadelphia in 1852. In March 1853, at the conclusion of his Preachership at Whitehall, he became Professor of Divinity in Queen's College, Birmingham, an office, however, which he held only for a few months. Church History was occupying his attention. He printed a selection from his Whitehall sermons, under the title oi Twenty Sermons for Town Congregations; and also the History of the Christian Church during the Middle Ages, In 1855 he was appointed Lecturer in Divinity in King's College, Cambridge; and Christian Advocate, which office caused the composition of the 1st part of the present work. In 1856 he was elected a member of the Council of the Senate, and re-elected in 1858. Earlj^ in 1856 he published the 2nd volume of his History of the Christian Church, embracing the Reformation Period ; and before the end of the year Part II. of this work. The Ilird Part was written in 1857 : and the lYth Part in 1858; in which year he also edited Thomas of Elmham's His- toria Monasterii S, Augustini Cantuariensis in the Series, com- menced in 1857, of "The Chronicles and Memorials of Great Britain and Ireland during the Middle Ages." In 1859, he carried through the press a second edition of the History of the Articles, much of the work being rewritten. Mr. Hardwick had just been appointed by the Bishop (T. X Prefatory Memoir. Turton) to the Archdeaconry of Ely, when his work on earth was cut short. He died by a fall in the Pyrenees, August 1 9, 1859, and was buried in the Protestant Cemetery at Luchon. No notice is taken in this survey of articles contributed to He views, or smaller papers read before the Antiquarian Society. Apart also from the works edited by Mr. Hardwick, which involved an amount of labour which a conscientious editor only can appreciate, the original works — the History of the Articles — the two volumes of Church History — and the four Parts of Christ and other Masters — have made him a name among the writers of the English Church, which will not soon be forgotten. Francis Procter. AUTHOR'S PREFACE. Many of the subjects I am here attempting to discuss have, in one shape or other, occupied the thoughts of previous writers, both at home and on the continent. To some of their productions, as the references annexed will testify, the present work has been indebted for valu- able suggestions: and even where I am not conscious of appropriating the materials, or adopting the results of others, it can hardly be expected that my observations are always original, or my researches independent. The only recent treatise which professes to grapple with exactly the same class of difficulties, is a volume published in 1848 by Mr F. D. Maurice, with the title The Religions of the World, and their relations to Christianity. Like other writings of that gifted author, it has naturally at- tracted a large circle of admirers, offering as it does some very choice reflections on the spirit that pervaded the religious systems of antiquity, Muhammedanism included. Still it seems to me, at least, that Mr. Maurice's treatment of the subject would have proved far more successful, had his method been more rigorously historical. He rather helps us to philosophize on what may possibly have been the attributes of those religions, as viewed by the more elevated minds of heathendom, than to determine the precise complexion of the popular belief, xii Preface, and its true relation to the doctrines of the Gospel. I feel, moreover, that the growth and permanence of such systems are always traceable quite as much to their accordance with the lower and depraved tastes of humanity, as to supernatural influences exerted on their constitution by the ever-present Logos, or to fragments of primeval truth they are supposed to have retained. The work itself will shew the animus with which objections have been met and answered. I hope that no assailant of Revealed Religion, with whom it is my duty to contend, will ever find his arguments misrepre- sented : and if in any case I manifest what seems to him a needless warmth of feeling, my apology must be the strong conviction which I entertain as to the sacredness of Christianity, and the exceeding blindness of those persons, who, having once embraced it, turn away from all its central doctrines with irreverence, coldness, or con- tempt. *A politic man,' observes Lord Bacon \ 'may write from his brain, without touch and sense of his*heart, as in a speculation that appertaineth not unto him ; but a feeling Christian will express in his words a character of zeal or love. The latter of which, as I could wish rather embraced, being more proper for these times, yet is the former warranted also by great examples.' One word of comment on the startling verdict of the Royal Commissioners^ with reference to the office which it is my privilege to fill. ' Objections,' they remark, 'have justly been made both to the name and to the office of Christian Advocate : for if the Christian religion requires defence, such defence should be a spontaneous act, not a hired service.* This criticism, I would submit, is no less adverse 1 Of Church Controversies^ Works, iii. 135, Lond. 1765. ^ Report of the Commissioners for the University of Cambridge^ p. 69. Preface. xiii to all kinds of religious endowments. Every one who enters into holy orders does so with the understanding that he has been called to preach, expound, and advocate, a definite system of belief; and every one who afterwards accepts ecclesiastical preferment, is converted by that step into a ' hired ' defender of his principles. In what respect foundations like those of Hulse, Boyle, and Bampton, are peculiarly obnoxious to the charge of fostering a sordid spirit in the persons who have been entrusted with the functions they prescribe, it is not easy to de- termine. But while urging this, I would by no means be understood to argue, that such endowments have been uniformly applied in the best manner possible. CONTENTS. PART I. INTRODUCTION. CHAPTER I. PAGE On the Eeligious Tendencies of the Present Age ... 3 CHAPTER II. On the Unity of the Human Race 34 Section i. ' Scriptural Proof . . . . . . . 38 2. Psychological Proof 40 3. Physiological Proof . . . . . . 44 4. Philological Proof 48 CHAPTER m. On the Characteristics of Religion under the Old Testament 57 Section i . The Law 62 2. The Promise 87 Appendix. The Absolute Religion iji xvi Contents. PART 11. RELIGIONS OF INDIA, CHAPTER I. PAGE Yarieties of Religious Thought among the Hindus . . 117 Section i. Vedaism . . . , 121 2. Brdhmanism 135 3. Schools of Philosophy i including Buddhism . 146 CHAPTER n. Apparent Correspondencies between Hinduism and Revealed Religion 175 Section i. Hindu monotheism 183 2. Hindu trinities J or triads 191 3. Hindu avat^ras or incarnations^ especially that of Krishna .... .... 196 CHAPTER HI. Real Correspondencies between Hinduism and Revealed Re- ligion 207 Section i. The primitive state of Man .... 209 2. The Fall of Man 213 3. The Hindu version of the Deluge . . . 219 4. The Hindu rite of Sacrifice 225 5. The Hindu hope of restoration . . . . 229 CHAPTER IV. Contrasts in the general development of Hinduism and Re- vealed Religion . . 232 Appendix I. The non- Aryan Tribes of Hindustan . . . 257 Appendix II. Coincidences between Lamaism and Medicsval Chris- tianity 263 Contents. xvii PART 111. RELIGIONS OF CHINA, AMERICA, AND OCEANICA. PAGE Introduction . . » . . 269 CHAPTER I. Religions op China 272 Section i. Confucianism 278 2. Tao-isniy or School of the Fixed Way . . . 307 3. Fo -ism 1 01 Chinese Buddhism , . . . 321 CHAPTER II. Religions of Ameeica 347 Section i. The wild Tribes of America .... 354 2. The demi-civilised Tribes, especially the Mexican 361 CHAPTER III. Religions op Oceanica 383 Section i. The Papuan Family 390 2. The Malay -Polynesian Family . . , . 394 PART IV. RELIGIONS OF EGYPT AND MEDO-PERSIA, CHAPTER I. Characteristics op Egyptian Heathenism 417 ^ CHAPTER II. Alleged Affinities between the Hebrew and Egyptian Sys- tems ............ 480 Section i. Bitual Resemblances 4^6 Circumcision 49^ Cherubim 493 Holy and most Holy Places . . . -497 XJrim and Thummim 49^ The Red Heifer 501 The Scape-Goat 5°^ 2. Doctrinal Contrasts 505 xviii Contents. CHAPTER III. PAGK Characteristics of Medo-Peesian Heathenism . . . .518 CHAPTEK lY. Alleged Affinities of the Medo-Peksian Ceeed to Hebraism AND Christianity . 544 Section i. The Fall of Man 552 2. Doctrine of the Evil One .... 554 3. Doctrine of Holy Angels ..... 558 4. Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Body . 563 5. Doctrine of a Benefactor and Mediator . . 566 Appendix I. Alleged Connexion between Coptic and Hehreiv . 574 Appendix II. Religions of the harharous Trihes of Africa . . 579 Index 584 PART I. INTRODUCTION. " J I INTRODUCTION". CHAPTER L On the Religious Tendencies of the Present Age. ^ \vairiiJi.ireL t^julcls cttI ivOecas (wsX^yei) TroLTjrds Kal cro^ovs Kal (pCkoaocpovs. — Origen, contra Celsum, Lib. vii. p. 359 (ed. Spencer). Periodic agitations in the moral world. Examples of these agitations: (i) Sixth century before Christ. (2) Fifteenth and sixteenth centuries after Christ. The present aspect of political affairs. The mental activity of the age. In lohat respects peculiar. Different effects of this activity on religious inquiries. First variety of modern thought. Second variety of modern thought. Its parallel in the Primitive Church. Third variety of modern thought. Examination of its prin- ciples. Hoio modified by the Idealistic philosophy. Universality of its sympathies. How affected toioards Christianity. The tendency retrogressive: leading men to Pantheism. 31 ain features of Pantheism. Antiquity of this class of objections. The Clementines. The first race of spiritualists. Celsus and his cavils. Neo-Platonism. Manichceism. Persistency of like objections. The spiritualists of the Reformation pe- riod. Lord Herbert. English and French Deists. Different modes of resisting these attacks. Plan and purpose of the present work. There is no more striking aspect in the history of religion than the correspondencies which it from time to time exhibits in remote and disconnected quarters of the world. The scholar who investigates the laws of thought in almost any period, not confining his inquiries to a single people or one group of cognate tribes, is sure to be impressed with a belief that mighty and mysterious agencies do verily exist in the recesses of our spiritual nature, and that He who regulates their action so as to produce phenomena which men are equally unable to create or to interpret, is not human but Divine. Conjunctures of this kind vrill often furnish the historian witli his res ting-points, or epochs. After traversing, it may 1—2 4 Christ and other Masters. [part I. be, centuries of stagnant uniformity, where all things promised to continue as they were, his thoughts are suddenly aroused by indications of a tempest, and the growth of some gigantic revolution. A new spirit, whence it came he cannot tell, begins to work at many different points below the surface of society, projecting a new order of ideas, stimulating sluggish faculties, and calling into active exercise another cycle of emotions. Many a problem which the former age abandoned as insipid, or intractable, begins to be discussed with fresh alacrity. The nature of God himself. His attributes, and His relation to the visible world ; the origin, and future destiny of man, — are all regarded as it seems through other media : and these changes, propagated simultaneously, in countries where no outward currents of communication are detected, and in countries linked together by the ties of blood, of language, and of commerce, constitute a different phase of civilisation,- if they do not actually commence an era in the fortunes of the human race. Some faint analogy may be perceived in the occasional convulsions of the physical world ; for instance, in great earth- quakes, such as that of 1755. The shock that buried Lisbon never ceased to vibrate till it reached the wilds of Scotland, and the vineyards of Madeira. It was felt among the islands of the Grecian Archijoelago ; it changed the level of the solitary lakes that sleep beneath the shadows of the Noric Alps. On turning to the annals of mankind we ascertain that few, if any, centuries have been more pregnant with events of universal moment than the sixth before the Christian era. While the members of the Hebrew commonwealth, honoured with the special custody of Holy Writ, were drooping in the grasp of Babylonic despotism, their sanctuary profaned, their liturgy suspended, and Jerusalem a heap of stones; — while they, alone in that desert of the nations, were conversing face to face with God, and learning more and more the perfect unity and spirituality of His essence, what a change was wrought meanwhile in other regions of the earth ! In Greece, for instance, we behold a young and ardent people rising day by day to eminence in arts, in letters, and in arms. The founders of Hellenic speculation had but recently commenced their struggles for the disenthralment of the human spirit. Colonies like that which had been planted at Marseilles were widening the horizon of men's- thoughts, and drawing Western Europe into union with the East ; while swarms of Orphic brotherhoods, the fresh creations either of Thrace, of Egypt, CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age, 5 or of Phrygia, were diftusing in all quarters the keen thirst they felt for reconciliation with the God of heaven, and an objective revelation of His will. In China a successful move- ment issued in the rehabilitating of the ancient state-religion. Almost every village of Persia was the theatre of changes more decisive and profound. A consciousness of some incurable antagonism among the elements of our moral being had there prompted Zoroaster to construct his theory of two rival prin- ciples. And, last of all, the birth of Gotama Buddha in ' the world of men ' was made a pretext for dethroning the religious system of his forefathers, — replacing the mythology of the Brahman by the cold and blank negations, which, in spite of all their dreariness, are still exerting a disastrous witcher;jr on the teeming millions of the East. Or glance we at a later stage of universal history, the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries after Christ; and we shall find a second cluster of these wonderful analogies. The day- star of religious liberty was rising in the north of Europe. As the multitude woke up from the protracted slumber of the Middle Ages, dreams that once bewildered them were fading from the mind. The old traditions, social, civil, and ecclesias- tical, were shaken to their roots, and lost their hold in every quarter. God was meanwhile felt to be peculiarly near to us, the living God, the moral Buler of the Universe, the righteous Lord not only of the Church collective, and of Christian commonwealths, but also of the human family at large, and every human conscience. It was mainly by the force of this conviction that the Saxon friar was impelled to lift his voice with such tremendous emphasis against the schoolmen and the Iloman pontiffs, and enabled to attract so vast an audience from all parts of western Christendom. Yet, strange to say, the mighty movement which he headed found some parallels in still more distant regions. 4- new incarnation of the Lama of Thibet effected permanent changes in one branch of Buddhism; while Baba Nanuk of Lahore, the Luther of the Panjab, felt himself constrained to reassert the absolute unity of God, and on the basis of that doctrine laboured to promote the fusion of the Brahman and the Muslim in one religious confraternity. Now persons are not wanting who affirm that agitations of our day betoken the approach, if not the actual presence, of some corresponding crisis in the history of man. I do not here allude to the momentous war, in which our statesmen have embarked, — a war, that after slaying thousands of our fellow-Christians, and disorganizing the political machinery of 6 Christ and other Masters. [part I. Europe, threatens to extend itself indefinitely among the Asiatic nations, and involve them also in the struggle. Sub- jects of this kind might fairly, it is true, engage the notice of a Christian advocate, who, conscious that the world is God's, and that His arm is ever visible in guiding or confounding human projects, had been urged to combat what is termed the 'positive' philosophy of Comte and other sociologists: for nothing could have more discredited their baseless theories, than the combinations we have recently been called to witness and the perils that beset the future course of western civili- sation. But such is not my purpose now. I rather wish to ask what are the spiritual characteristics of the age in which we live, and whether any of the fermentations in the moral and intellectual world have given birth to tendencies pecu- liarly detrimental to the interests of Christian truth. That our own lot has been really cast within a period of extraordinary mental vigour and activity it is impossible to deny. The closer study of the human constitution, physical and psychological; the victories achieved by modern sciences inspiring an idea that every difficulty in nature may ere long be mastered by the progress of invention ; the astonishing facilities of intercourse among ourselves and other members of the family of nations ; the establishment of truer canons both in verbal and historic criticism ; profound researches into the structure and affinities of language ; the more coj)ious inductions of ethnology, elucidating the condition of the ancient world, and helping us to track the pre-historic wanderings of influential tribes ; a broader, and, in many cases, juster view of heathen- dom, the character of its divinities and its relation to the Church of God ; a quick j^erception of the vastness of the i*ational creation, and the higher value we have learned to place on individual souls, — these all have, in a greater or less degree, assisted in the modification of established theories, in opening new veins of thought, and in exciting yearnings that were scarcely ever felt by earlier ages of the world. And, as we might have easily foreseen, the great enlargement of our sphere of knowledge, and our deeper sympathies with everything that bears the impress of humanity, have been combined in certain quarters with a feverish love of speculation, and an irrepressible desire of change. First principles are now more freely called in question, sifted with a bold and microscopic criticism, and not unfrequently rejected with an utter disregard of ancient prepossessions, maxims and authorities. Here also it appears that the portentous agitation is not limited to Christian countries, CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 7 nor to those of tliem who as distinguished for their intellectual prowess have been commonly esteemed the champions of the right of free inquiry. It has even roused the Jew himself from his supineness^: it has taught him to interpret and defend his sacred books as he had never done before. Of course, the epoch is not absolutely singular : there have been many like it, where the human mind was similarly quickened, and gave similar indications of the fevers that possessed it. Still the present generation has peculiar character- istics,^ and is often penetrated by a spirit of its own. I do not say that gifted individuals now reflect more deeply on particular questions, or have grown more clearly conscious of the diffi- culties by which those questions are encompassed. Who, for instance, ever looked the hardest problems of humanity more fully in the face than Origen or St. Augustine, Anselm or Aqui- nas? Who, so long as we continue in the present stage of our existence, will approximate more closely to the right solution of them than such men as Bacon, Butler, Pascal, and Leibnitz ? But granting this, it must be also granted, first, that there has been of late a marvellous increase in the area of the field of speculation; and, secondly, that the number of speculative minds is multiplied almost indefinitely. What hosts of ques- tions that had once been canvassed only in the narrow circle of divines and schoolmen and philosophers, are now dispersed among the mass of the community, and agitated far and near ! The ever-teeming press exposes them to universal criticism ; and thus attempts are making to resolve — to handle, weigh, and measure, one might say — the mysteries of God and man, of life, of death, and of eternity, alike in the saloons of opulence, the crowded halls of science, and the workshop • of the rudest artisan. On every side we recognise the same determination to know more about the real ground of men's convictions, an impatience of restraint, a fearless self-assertion, and a fixed resolve to push whatever principle they may embrace to its remotest consequence, with small regard to other inferences no less legitimate, by which the former should in reason have been traversed and controlled. i> 1. If our thoughts are concentrated on the single province ^ * Judaism, roused from her velopment of the Religious Idea, lethargy by the mighty upheavings p. 3, Lond. 1855. This able work, of the age, has at length arisen and written by a Jew, who speaks of steps forth out of her long obscurity the Old Testament almost in the into the broad smilight of general style of Maurer and De Wette, ia consciousness.' PMlippsohn, De- itself a sign of the times. 8 Christ and other Masters. [part i. of religion, we shall see, as might have been anticipated, that the spirit of the age has there left very deep impressions of its power. One class, indeed, of educated Englishmen have never drifted far from the positions of the previous generation. They continue to look down unmoved on all the tossings of their neighbours. Nor can theirs be termed the silence of misgiving or the self-possession of indifference ; it is rather the tranquillity, of deep and living faith. For in their ranks are many of the brightest luminaries both of scholarship and science \ — minds of a gigantic stature ; minds, moreover, that are gifted with the finest critical acumen, and that never hesitate to exercise it in determining religious questions, such as in their judgment man may fairly hope to master. Subject to this limitation they are advocates of progi*ess ; and accordingly we hear them welcome every species of research that may contribute to the stores of sacred knowledge. They are foremost in acquiring and com- paring languages, in tracing the descent of nations, and in dis- interring such materials as are calculated to supply the blanks that we deplore in Jewish or in Christian history. On men like these, however, the effect of modern progress and discovery is to strengthen their belief in the announcements of the Bible. Whichever way they turn, its truthfulness is more completely vindicated, and their hold upon its mysteries proportionally confirmed^. They are most conscious, it is true, that in the kingdoms both of grace and nature, in the volume of God's works and in the volume of His word, a thousand dijfficulties remain which they are utterly unable to decipher; depths of thought they never hope to fathom, discords which they cannot harmonize, and elevations which they cannot climb. Such problems as the origin and growth of evil, that profound enigma into which so many others are eventually resolved; 1 One of the highest types of this knowledge are animated by his re- school was the late Eegius Pro- verential spirit, fessor of Hebrew at Cambridge, — *Nescire velle, quae Magister Op- the lamented Dr. Mill, who, in the timus vastness of his erudition, in the Docere non vult, erudita inscitia grasp and clearness of his reason- est.' ing faculties, in his scientific attain- ^ t Magis magisque mihi confir- ments, and his unswerving ortho- mabatur omnes versutarum calum- doxy, was more than a match for niarum nodos, quos illi deceptores the apostles of modern scepticism nostri adversus divines Libros in- and unbelief. See his Christian nectebant, posse dissolvi.' S. Au- Advocate's Fahlications^ passim. gust. (7o7z/ess.,lib.vi. c.3. 'Titubabit Few scholars ever knew so much, autem fides, si divinarum Scriptu- and fewer still when they have rarumvacillatauctoritas.' DeDoctr. reached the utmost verge of human Christ. ^ lib. i. c. xxxvii. CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 9 such principles of the Divine ceconomy as that of sacrifice or mediation, though they recognise its perfect fitness, and embrace it on their knees, — are felt to be immeasurably above their present comprehension ; yet so numerous and convergent are the testimonies which commend the doctrines of the Gospel to their inmost heart \ that all the arrows of the Tempter fall innocuous, blunted by the shield of faith. A man of this kind knows in what he has believed ; and though he still sees darkly, communing with adumbrations of the truth, and not with truth itself, he waits in patience till that veil which separates the present from the future has been finally withdrawn, till Christianity has been divested of the earthly symbols under which it is presented to his faith, and he beholds it as it is. What happens in the physical world as the reward of patient observation, will, he is persuaded, happen also in the moral world. The seeming incongruities will form at last a concordis- sima dissonantia, and the riddles that now test and try us, will be then converted into proofs of harmony and vehicles of love. 2. But there is a powerful class of minds in England as in other parts of Europe, who are differently affected in their estimate of sacred topics by the fluctuations of the present day. The widening of their field of vision and the light that has been thrown on many of their favourite studies, so far from adding vigour to the principle of faith, has rather tended to disturb their intellectual balance, and induced a state of feeling which approaches, here and there at least, to very serious misbelief. The causes more immediately at work in the production of the change will doubtless vary with the tone and texture of the individual mind; but all whom I include in this division are alike dissatisfied with what they style ^ the popular religion,' or the views of Christianity now current in different branches of the Church. Devoted in some cases to the study of the mechanism of nature, these persons form the habit of regarding the Almighty rather as a God of law and order, ^a great Mechanician,' who has, once for all, impressed upon his works the tendencies which they are bound to follow, than as ever ^ After dwelling on the import- casions ou des motifs qui Font fait ance of criteria by which to separate naltre : elle va au delk de I'entende- the true religion from the false, ment, et s'empare de la volonte et Leibnitz (Th6odicee, (Euvres, ii. 42, du coeur, pour nous faire agir avec Paris, 1842) does not fear to add: chaleur et avec plaisir, comme la loi ' Cependant la foi divine elle-meme, de Dieu le commande, sans qu'on ait quand elle est allumee dans I'ame, plus besoin de penser aux raisons, ni est quelque chose de plus qu'une des'arreterauxdifficult^s deraison- opinion, et ne depend pas des oc- nementquel'espritpeut envisager.* 10 Christ and other Masters. [part I. present ■with the sacred family and as ever active in the government of all things. Hence a disposition to reduce the supernatural elements of Christianity within the smallest possible compass, and in many cases to escape from the con- sideration of barely physical miracles, without, however, any conscious wish to call in question the abstract possibility of a miraculous intervention. The nature, method, limits, and effects of prophecy, and generally of that mysterious influence exercised upon the mind and spirit of the sacred writers which is termed their inspiration, have on similar grounds provoked the criticism of this school of theologians. In their eyes the evidence of Christianity, the single ground on which it ever must depend, is the inherent fitness of its central doctrines to appease their moral and emotional wants. But this position, where exclu- sively asserted, has involved them in the maintenance of others less consistent with the ^ popular theology.' They contend for the importance, not to say necessity, of discriminating between the form of a religion and its essence; or, in other words, require us to abstract the kernel of the truth from what is merely husk and shell, and so determine what portions of the Holy Scriptures are divine, and really entitled to the designa- tion ' Word of God.' Their chief criterion in conducting such a process they derive from what are called * the pure instincts ' of our spiritual nature, which it is affirmed enable us to call in question and correct some representations of the sacred v/riters, more especially of the Old Testament; the letter of which is held to be deficient in moral dignity, and even said to violate in some respects the perfect law of conscience. ' How inscru- table also,' it is whispered, ^ are the views there furnished of the character of God Himself! How stern the aspects under which He is presented in His dealings with the world at large ! How awful and repulsive the idea that beings gifted with such scanty opportunities of knowledge should have power to make them- selves incorrigible in the present life, and so consign themselves to hopeless misery in the next ! How terribly mysterious the arrangement in virtue of which an inconsiderable fraction of the human family has ever been elected from the guilty mass ; while others are abandoned to their own devices, or have only faint and flickering lights to guide them in their searchings after God.' Allusions to these topics have exposed their authors to the charge of striving to disparage the supremacy of Christianity, by placing it in the same line with philosophical systems of the heathen world, and recognising also in such systems a prophetic office and a genuine revelation. It is not CHAP. I.] Eeligious Tendencies of the present Age. 11 my purpose to determine liow far the charge has been substan- tiated. I notice it in order to bring out more clearly the supposed connexion of these modes of thought with others that will be discussed hereafter. But candour, in the meantime, urges me to add that wild as may have been the intellectual aberrations of the former class, they are not consciously opposed to Christianity itself. Their reverence for the Person of our blessed Lord is warm and constant; their devotion to His service is indisputable. We understand them, in so far at least as their opinions are connected with the present subject, by reverting to the mental struggles of the early Church at Alexandria. As soon as ever Christian truth had come in contact with the speculative yearnings that prevailed in heathendom, its own adherents were divided into schools of thought considerably diverging from each other. One of these predominated in the West, the second in the East, especially in what was then a kind of philosophical exchange for all the various theorizers of the age, — the schools of Alexandria. Origen and others whom he represented, after weighing and con- trasting the claims of Christianity with those of the prevailing heathen systems, occupied a somewhat new position \ They had listened to the pleas of Gnosticism ; they saw it ramifying in all quarters and assuming everywhere the most grotesque expression; yet instead of treating it as an utter falsification of Christianity, they sympathised with it so far as to allow that real mental wants had given birth to many of its theories. They strove accordingly to satisfy the cravings of the pseudo- Gnosis by the substitution of a Gnosis properly so-called. They granted that the faith of ordinary Christians (ttlo-tls) was in many points a popular adaptation rather than a sci- 1 Mr. E. W. Mackay {Rise and liecontinues(p. r94)/oftheso-called Progress of Cfiristianity, -p. ig^)\fill philosophy seems to have been an not, however, concede the name of enlarged and more liberal compre- philosophy to the Alexandrian spe- hension of former systems ; the ad- culations, because 'a philosophy tied mission, against dogged ignorance, to dogmatic authority is a manifest of the general claims of heathen self-contradiction.' His meaning wisdom as well as Jewish, as part of probably is that philosophy in his a universal revelation ; and on the peculiar acceptation of the term can- other hand the assertion, against the not coexist with an objective reve- onesidedness of heretical Gnosis, lation ; and yet the phenomena of of the plain doctrines of Christian- nature which are the subject of all ity.' A more exact account of the natural philosophy are as truly such principles and tendencies of this a revelation as the Holy Scriptures school is furnished by Guerike, De professtobe. * The chief distinction,' Schola quce AlexandricB Jhruit, etc. 12 Christ and other Masters. [part I, entific expression of the truth; and that beneath the ter- minology of the Church there lay a richer vein of doctrines which philosophers, and they alone, could thoroughly appre- ciate. Such thoughts would necessarily colour all the stream of Alexandrine theology, and especially the views of Clement, Origen, and their disciples, with regard to the position of the heathen world. No absolute boundary was drawn between the Christian Church and it; philosophy standing in the same relation to the one as did the law of Moses to the other, and serving as a kind of pedagogue to bring men unto Christ \ They raised the Gospel, it is true, indefinitely above all previous systems, and regarded it as supei'^eding and completing them; but a profound anxiety to place it on a broader basis and in more intelligible connexion with ancient history as well as with the literary and artistic culture of mankind at large, impelled them to approximate as closely as the nature of the case allowed to the position of the pseudo- Gnostics. On the other hand, the Latin fathers, and especially theii* sternest type, Tertullian ^, as uniformly laboured to repel those foreign elements which Gnosticism would fain have mingled and in- corporated with the primitive belief. The barrier which they raised between the old and new convictions was impassable. The pagan world to them was anti- Christian in its very core ; ^ See, for instance, the remark- tions of the truth as taught by able passage in Clemens Alexand. Plato were derived directly from Stromata, lib. i. c. 5 (p. 331, ed. the Hebrew scriptures: Gieseler, Potter), and others in Mr Trench's EccL Hist. 1. 163, n. 5, Edinb. 1846. Hulsean Lectures (1846), p. 157, ^ Inldi^ Be Anima, G.2^,hQQQX\Q note. It should, however, be re- Plato ' omnium h^reticorum con- membered that the eulogies of the dimentarius ; ' but a more complete Greek Fathers were generally limit- specimen of his modes of thought ed to Platonism, a system which is furnished in the De Prcescriptione had doubtless acted here and there Hcereticonim, c. 7 and c. 8: ' Quid as a positive preparation for the ergo Athenis et Hierosolymis ? Quid Gospel. Many Platonists were num- academise et ecciesias? Quid haere- bered among the early converts, ticis et Christianis? Nostra in- and some appear to have retained stitutio de portion Salomonis est : their scholastic mantle, esteeming qui et ipse tradiderat, Dominum in what they had embraced the true simplicitate cordis esse quaerendum. philosophy: see Justin's DmZo^. c. Viderint qui Stoicum et Platonicum 3, c. 8, and Eusebius iv. 26, § 4. et dialecticum Christianismum pro- Their main positions were (i) that tulerunt. Nobis curiositate opus the Logos {daapKos or cnrepfxarLKos) non est post Christum Jesum, nee had constantly communicated to inquisitione post Evangelium. Cum men the seeds of Divine truth, so credimus, nihil desideramus ultra that the doctrines of Plato were in credere:' cf. Adv. Hermogenerriy c. many cases not essentially different viii. and Hippolytus, Philosoph. v. from those of Christ: (2) that por- 6, Oxon. 185 1. CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 13 and even if it could be proved that correspondencies to any rites or dogmas of the Church were manifest in heathen systems, Tertullian and his school evaded the objections drawn from such phenomena, by urging that the whole of Gentilism was only a distorted copy of primordial truth, or else was actually derived from a perusal of the Old Testament Scrip- tures \ The traces left by both these parties on the current literature of the Church it is superfluous to point out. 3. But then, as now, there was a third variety of sentiment with reference to the claims of Christianity and its relation to the heathen world. I cannot tell how far the members of this third school draw their tenets from the writings of the Alexandrines, or have been affected by the speculations of their modern representatives. The path was very short and slippery from the standing-ground of orthodox Gnosticism to that of Marcion or Carpocrates. Nor can it be disputed that a like transition has been simplified in recent times by treatises of Christian philosophers, who themselves are checked in their descent to scepticism and disbelief. If men like Coleridge have indulged in vehement and indiscriminate charges of * bibliolatry,' intending by that phrase all deference to the letter of our sacred books as absolutely true ; if they have openly repudiated what they term the popular theology as destitute of Christian life and spirit, and have even represented some of its foremost doctrines as no better than a species of * devil-worship,' — one need hardly marvel if a second generation of reformers claim the right of drawing bolder inferences from such ideas, and resolve to free themselves entirely from the ^ Thus he asks in his Apolog. c. cimt.' He explains the affinity by XLVii: 'Unde hasc, oro vos, philo- urging that Plato borrowed from sophis aut poetis tana consimilia? the Hebrews, In his Confessiones, nonnisi de nostris sacramentis : si lib. vii. c. 20, he also alludes to the de nostris sacramentis, ut de prio- preparatory effect produced on his ribus, ergo fideliora sunt nostra own mind by the writings of the magisque credenda, quorum ivia- Platonists, but is careful to point gines quoque fidem inveniunt.' out the insufficiency of everything The Latin Fathers in the age of St. short of the Holy Scriptures to Augustine had considerably modi- teach the way to heaven. His cau- fied their tone in treating of these tious language is explained when subjects. Thus in the De Civitate we remember that he had to d^al Dei, lib. viii. c. 11, we read : * Mi- with Christian Platonists, ' Qui di- rantur autem quidam nobis in cere ausi sunt omnes Domini nostri Christi gratia sociati, cum audiunt Jesu Christi sententias, quas mirari vel legunt Platonem de Deo ista et praedicare coguntur, de Platonis sensisse, quae multum congruere libris eu-mdidicisse :' cf.De Doctrina veritati nostrse religionis agnos- Christiana^ lib. ii. c. 28. 14< Christ and other Masters. [part l irksome fetters of tradition. If it be again contended, that all branches of the human family possess the same kind of inspirations, owing to the universal presence of the Word of God within them ; if the Holy Ghost be rather sent to waken up a slumbering consciousness of Christianity already planted in the soul than to infuse the elements of supernatural life, and bring the fallen spirit back to fellowship with Christ, a door is opened for the broad and specious theory, that the Gospel is at best a higher stage of natural religion, or, it may be, one of numerous forms, in which the spiritual instincts of humanity have found an utterance for themselves. With this remark on what appears to be at least a possible affinity between the second and third varieties of modem thought, I pass to an examination of the principles enunciated in the latter school. And first, it is observable that when a similar class of questions were discussed some years ago, the dress which they assumed was very different. What is known as the * sensational' philosophy was then in the as- cendant, or was not so commonly abandoned as it now is ; and the fashion, therefore, was to ransack all the chambers and the tombs of history in quest of some objective bases for explaining the resemblances between the heathen systems and that founded by our blessed Lord. It was usual to suppose that certain general truths had been communicated in the infancy of the human race, by means of 'a primeval preternatural revelation V and that Christianity may therefore have preserved at least some fragments of such revelation, like the other extant creeds. They all, it was contended, were ultimately reducible to the same level ; yet as none of them was altogether earthly in its origin, or merely a projection from the spiritual consciousness of man, the hope was entertained that in proportion to the growth of criticism, the aboriginal form of true religion might be rescued from accretions under which it lay concealed. During the last twenty years, however, there has been a mighty change in the character of the established philosophy, and that change has gradually influenced the complexion of ^ Such, for example, was the looked for in the source of all reve- solution adopted by the Unitarian lations, in that with which all reve- author, Mr. Belsham ; but Mr. W. lations must be identified to be J Fox, originally of the same sect genuine, — the moral . constitution {Religious Ideas, p. 66, Lond. 1849), of human nature, the human mind corrects his predecessor. * That and heart.' early revelation, ' he urges, * is better CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 15 assaults on Christianity itself. A species of idealism is now the favourite system. The invisible world is recognised as one province of creation ; a belief in what is spiiitual and supersensuous has returned. Men's thoughts have been di- rected inward, so that speculators are impelled to search amid the silent depths of their own being, for the oracle that is to satisfy their cravings and to disentangle their perplexities. The j)rimitive idea of God, it is maintained, by a spontaneous process of self-evolution leads directly upward to the purest and noblest conceptions of His nature, prompts the various ^races' of mankind to fashion their theologies in harmony with the instincts of the human spirit, and thus determines the religious character of every age and people. While the former generation struggled by the aid of criticism to weaken and destroy the credibility of Holy Scripture, or evacuated and etherialised the special doctrines of Christianity where these could not be utterly expunged, the new school commonly admit that some such doctrines were announced by Christ or His immediate successors, but profess to treat them as so many natural products of the ordinary human mind, as self- devised expedients for appeasing a peculiar class of human wants and aspirations, or as forms assumed by the ideas of God in one peculiar stage of their development. Religions generally, and the Gospel as one member of the class, are therefore mere expressions of the fundamental beliefs inherent in our spiritual nature. These writers commonly refuse to be indebted for their guidance to a sacred book or any kind of outward revelation ^ We no longer hear of Christ importing into Palestine the precious lore which had been gathered from the lips or volumes of the Eastern sages. We have not to answer the objection that His doctrines and precepts may be traced to this or that enlightened Hebrew, or were simply modern adaptations of maxims and traditions which had long been current in some Jewish sect. Objections of this kind have broken down, or balanced and destroyed each other. Of course the ^ In this respect the system of extreme indulgence to idolaters, the Mormons, which in other fea- Yet in sifting all other creeds, which tnres is not unlike the Absolute it professes to have done (Gunni- Eeligion, occupies a very different son, The Mormons , pp. 60, 61, Phi- place. It allows that revelations ladelphia, 1852), it makes use of of God's will have been made to all what is held to be the genuine the world, so that there is no people book-revelation, and does not ap- who have not some portions of the peal to mere instincts of human- truth among them. It even shews ity. 16 Clirist and other Masters. [part I. general resemblance of Christ's teaching to the teaching of His predecessors is affirmed, but such resemblance is attributed by spiritualists to the unaided operation of the religious sentiment in man, awakened and directed by peculiar circumstances. Nor can these be termed the speculations of a band of ignorant or dreamy mystics. They are entertained by men of learning ; who profess moreover a peculiar interest in the progress of civilisation, and who labour to advance what they believe to be the disenthralment of the human spirit. They affirm that something higher, deeper, heavenlier, is reserved for us; that growth must be expected and promoted not only in our apprehension of religious truth, but in the orb of truth itself; that their peculiar mission is to hasten this result by shewing man his real dignity and destiny, by sounding all the depths of human consciousness, and calling to their aid the newest facts of history and the last discoveries of science. They do not, indeed, contemn the worthies of antiquity. The statues of Confucius, Moses, and Pythagoras ; of Socrates, and Zoroaster ; of Buddha, Christ, and Apollonius ; of Mani and Muhammad, are all elevated side by side in the Walhalla of spiritualism. These all in different measures are applauded as the saints, the prophets, the apostles of their age ; yet, notwith- standing the enormous latitude of his belief, the spiritualist is not content with any of the forms in which religion has hitherto appeared on earth. However well adapted to peculiar countries or to transitory phases of the human mind, they are unequal to the wants and capacities of the present century. He would not himself have worshipped either with his ' swarthy Indian who bowed down to wood and stone,'- or with his ^ grim-faced Calmuck,' or his ' Grecian peasant,' or his ' savage,' whose hands were ^ smeared all over with human sacrifice ;' but rather aims, by analysing the principles of heathenism and cultivating a deeper sympathy with what is termed the * great pagan world,* to organise a new system which he calls the Absolute Keligion, the Religion of humanity, the Religion of the Future. From it all special dogmas are to be eliminated; sentiments vwhich every one may clothe according to his fancy, are to occupy the place of facts ; the light of a spontaneous Gospel is to supersede the clumsy artifi.ce of teaching by the aid of a historical revela- tion. Thus, while the promoters of this scheme afl^ect the greatest reverence for the wisdom and the so-called * inspiration' of the past, they aim to soar indefinitely above it. Nearly all the doctrines of ancient systems are abandoned or ex]3lained CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 17 awaj\ as things which really have no stronger claim upon us than the cycle of luxuriant mythes that captivated Greek ima- ginations in the pre-historic period. The Christ and Christi- anity of the Bible are thus virtually denied: ^superior intellects' are bidden to advance still higher, to cast off as worthless or ill-fitting the old garments of the Church, to join the standard of the Absolute Religion, and so march forward to Hhe pro- mised land.' Mr. Theodore Parker, one of their chief oracles, shall tell us what it is that we are summoned to believe ; or rather (for his system cannot boast of its constructiveness) what points they are that we are urged to throw away. After dwelling on the article of his faith — belief in what is called an ' Infinite God' — he thus proceeds, with painful flippancy of manner far too common in the schools of ^spiritualism:' *0f course I do not believe in a devil, eternal torment, nor in a particle of absolute evil in God's world or in God. I do not believe that there ever was a miracle, or ever will be ; everywhere I find law, — the constant mode of operation of the Infinite God. I do not beUeve in the miraculous inspiration of the Old Testament or the New Testament. I do not believe that the Old Testament was God's first word, nor the New Testament his last. The Scriptures are no finality to me. Inspiration is a perpetual fact. Prophets and Apostles did not mono- polize the Father: He inspires men to-day as much as heretofore. In nature, also, God speaks for ever. . . .1 do not believe in the miraculous origin of the Hebrew Church, or the Buddhist Church, or the Christian Church; nor the miraculous character of Jesus. I take not the Bible for my master, nor yet the Church ; nor even Jesus of Nazareth for my master I try all things by the human faculties But at the same time, I reverence the Christian Church for the great good it has done to mankind; I reverence the Mahometan Church for the good it has done, — a far less good^.' Such is one example of the creed commended as a substitute ] , for Christianity. W e are to hold the doctrine of one Infinite ' God, and then are left at liberty to disbelieve whatever else we ! please. Nor is the process of negations even here exhausted. The principles of spiritualism have carried many of their! owners, by a course of fearless logic, into a denial of the Personal God Himself ; and more who join the movement, who [ inscribe the name of freedom on their banners and talk loudly of the progress and perfectibility of man, are drifting in the \ very same direction, — to that vortex in which faith and morals 1 'Eeligion,' says Mr. F. "W. New- 2 Theism, 'Atheism, and the Po- man, 'was created by the inward pular Theology, -pji. 26^, 264. Other instincts of the soul : it had after- extracts, serving to elucidate the wards to be pruned and chastened principles of this School, are adde(^ by the sceptical understanding.' in Appendix I. Phases of Faith, p. 232. H. 2 18 Christ and other Masters. [part I. I also will be finally engulfed. For all the tendencies of this belief, whatever its apostles may affirm, are absolutely retro- gressive; it is carrying men afresh to paganism^ In spite of all its claims to a superior illumination, it leaves its votary \ with no intelligible object of worship but himself : it does not .solve one mystery of his being; nay, it cannot even guarantee > the immortality of his soul. Mr. Parker, it is true, with small regard to the coherence of his principles, contends for the idea of God, which he has boiTOwed from the Bible, as different in kind from what is called the Universe, as self-subsisting and unchangeable ^* He also, it . must be acknowledged, is impressed with the reality and universality of the * religious sentiment,' which he deems Hhe strongest and deepest element in human nature;' and some other writers of his school are doubtless under the influence of like convictions. Still it is indisputable that for the last twenty years or more the monstrous form of Pantheism has threatened to devour a host of minor infidelities. The young Hegelians of Germany^ are pantheists to a man; fnd even the eclectic philosophy of M. Cousin'* is not easily vindicated from the chars^e of fosterinor the same, delusion. ^ Philippsohn, the Jewish writer above cited, has some striking ob- servations on this tendency of mo- dern thought, tracing it into its inevitable effects on morals as well as theology. One section of the anti-Talmudic Jews appears to be influenced by it. 'The Human Idea,' he concludes, p. 253, ' ever produces its own resolution into its various successive phases ; each of these phases abrogates that which it followed, till it reaches its ulti- mate stage, the virtual disavowal of its own system. Such was its course in the religions of anti- quity ; in the philosophemes of the Greeks ; in the later philosophemes of Des Cartes and Spinosa as in that of Hegelism. It is a circle that ever, terminates in itself, the serpent that holds its own tail in its mouth.'' The Pantheism of many Jewish speculators in the Middle Ages has been noticed by Van Mildert, Boyle Lectures, 1. 258 sq. 2 Theism, Atheism, and the Po- pular Theology y pp. 105 sq. ^ One of Neander's latest warn- ings referred to the gigantic pro- gress of this evil: 'Die eigentliche und alles verschlingende Gefahr wahrhaft liegt in dem sich nahern- den entscheidenden Kampfe fiir das ivahre Dasein des Christen^ thums selhst, des Sittengesetzes, des Glaubens an einen personlichen Gott; ein Kampf, gegen welchen ganz unbedeutend erscheinen miis- sen alle Streitigkeiten zwischeu verschiedenen christlichen Gemein- schaf ten, und wogegen zuriicktreten miissen die untergeordneten Gegen- satze zwischen Katholicismus und Protestantismus.' Deutsche Zeit- schrlft, for May, 1850, p. 163. •* See Morell's Hist, of Phil. 11. 512, 513, Maret's Essai sur le Pantheisjne dans Ics Societes Mo- dernes, 3me ed., Paris, 1845, — a work of great ability, but now and then one-sided, especially when it tries to shew that orthodox 'Pro- testantism' may be convicted of Pantheistic tendencies. The learn- ed author ought to have reflected CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 19 I shall not here dwell upon the ravings of * material ' pantheists, a minor class of speculators who rejoice to think with Comte that the religious sentiment in man is always necessarily weakened in proportion to his intellectual development, and who accordingly have joined the clamour for some 'ISTouveau Grand-Etre;' that is, for no God at all. But disregarding such, we find that even the more 'spiritual' section of the pantheists adopt the same ideas respecting Christianity as those already censured. The universe is in their system deified, or transubstantiated into God, its laws and processes are all identified with Him ; humanity at large becomes a necessary manifestation of the Absolute. He is the ocean, we the waves. The various forms of human thought are all therefore equally inevitable and equally legitimate; evil is itself phenomenal, and nothing more, — the point of depar- ture to a second moral state, which men distinguish by the name of good; while error is no more than uncompleted truth, or truth at some inferior stage of its development. Religions, in like manner, being based on what is termed Hhe spontaneity of the human reason,' or the natural inspirations flowing from the breasts of seers and sages who resign themselves entirely to the guidance of the light within them, are equally fatuitous, and vary with the age and people in the midst of which they flourish. They can never hope to rise above the spiritual level of their authors ; yet they all are to be viewed as true, because the genuine products of humanity, and adapted to the ends they are intended to subserve^ that Eomanism is far more open hrew Monarchy, p. 26, 2nd ed.) is to the charge of denying ♦ une v^rite compelled to admit that in early absolue et immuable' and of advo- times 'the pure monotheistic faiths* eating ' la notion d'une v^rit^ pro- could not have been preserved ex- gressive et mobile' (p. 24). Thus a cept by what he calls 'intolerance,* Romanist writer in the Bevuf. des i. e. want of sympathy with error. Deux Mondes, 1854, Tome viii. p. Heathenism in our own age is still 1097, contends: 'Le catholique pre- most lenient in its estimate of 'col- nant le dogme tel que le temps Va lateral polytheistic systems.' M, fait est, en un sens, bien plus pres Hue's Travels furnish several in- de la grande philosophic que le pro- stances of this, and the following testant, qui cherche k revenir sans extract shews that the BrjChmans cesse h, une pretendue formule are actuated by the same spirit: primitive du Christianisme.' 'Although stedfast in his faith, ^ This plea for universal 'tole- the Hindoo is not fanatical: he ration' has, doubtless, commended never seeks to make proselytes, the philosophical Pantheism of the If the Creator of the world, he says, day to one class of English minds: had given the preference to a cer- yet even Mr. F. W. Newman {He- tain religion, this alone would have I 20 Christ aiid other Masters. [part I. It will be shewn hereafter how the same denial of the Personality of God pervaded nearly all the heathen systems of the ancient world, and everywhere produced the same results in ethics and theology. At present I shall only draw attention to the periodical recurrence of a similar spirit in the times posterior to the promulgation of Christianity. This course will serve a twofold purpose : it will render us familiar with the parentage of the objections which are levelled at the Gospel by our modern adversaries; it will indicate hovr deep is the vitality of truth, how constant its resistance, and. how sure its final triumph. I For if adversaries, starting up on every side, and armed with every species of objection, sought in vain to strangle Christianity at its birth ; if they were baffled when the fashion was to scoff it down as the religion ' of weavers, shoemakers, and slaves;' if they retired before it till the symbol of the / cross surmounting the conquered dragon was impressed on the imperial coinage, and till heathenism itself became Hlie faith of peasants ' (paganismus) ; if they won no credit even as supported by the zeal, the learning, and the power of Julian ; if they furbish the old weapons only to be once again repulsed, when Julian's taunting ^^I'ophecy has been for cen- turies confuted by experience, when those very nations which he deemed impervious to the Gospel rank among its foremost champions, and send forth the missionary in whose hands it is trans]:)l anted fresh at the antipodes, we may assuredly discover in this growth the evidence of supernatural life, the auguries of better things to come. When Christianity was first announced in the great theatres of Oriental speculation it was forced at once into collision with those very systems out of which its modern enemies would fain extract it ; and the struggle that ensued elicited in every case an opposition similar to that which it encounters now from persons who are studying to malign it or betray it with a kiss. Among the first assailants of the Pentateuch^, we find a writer who disparaged the idea of all objective reve* prevailed upon the earth ; but as therefore beholds with satisfaction there are many religions, this proves the various ways in which He is the approbation of them by the worshipped.' Bjornstjerna, Theo- Most High. Men of an enlightened gony of the Hindoos, p. 67, Lond. understanding, says the Brahman, 1844. well know that the Supreme has ^ Cf. Neander, Ch. Hist., i. 490, imparted to each nation the doc- and Schliemann, Die Clementine Ji, trine most suitable for it, and He pp. 193 — 199, Hamburg, 1844. CHAP. I.] Eeligioiis Tendencies of the present Age, 21 lation^, sucli as Christians entertained from the beginning. In the room of this it was proposed to substitute the inward revelation of the heart. An early race of Gnostics in like manner drew their inspirations altogether from within. Their composite system, borrowed partly from the Gospel, partly from the ancient creeds of Asia, was designed for the ^ superior intellects ' of the day, whom intuition (so they urged) exalted far above the sphere of faith, and liberated from the bondage of original Christianity. Hence they gloried in the name of * spiritualists^,' and called Hhe man of the Church' by a contemptuous title, intimating that he was still in subjection to the grosser elements of his nature. For a time the flattering speculations of this school obtained extensive currency; it put out branches in all quarters; it attracted multitudes of proselytes; and yet we search in vain for any of those noble fruits brought forth by Christianity. The system of the early Gnostic would not work; and therefore it lias been extinct for centuries, unless perchance some trace of it is still discernible among the Druses of Mount Lebanon, whose doctrines here and there remind one of the creed of Basilides'"^. Again, it was by weapons such as those which had been wielded in the school of ^ spiritualism,' though weapons of a coarser edge, that Celsus undertook to stem the progress of the early Church. ^ He,' says ISTeander*, ' is the original represen- tative of a class of intellects which, in the various attacks on Christianity, has over and over again presented itself to our j notice : wit and acumen, without earnestness of purpose or I depth of research ; a worldly understanding that looks at things i merely on the surface, and delights in hunting up difficulties and contradictions.' Celsus was, moreover, an avowed spiri- tualist. He taunts the Christian as belonging to an abject and ^ See the Clementine Homilies, Montanists in like manner boasted ed. Dressel, xviii. 6: ^ATroKaXvxpb that they were 7r;/ei;/AaTiicot as being eoTt TO h irda-ais Kapdiats dudpibirtav in possession of the last develop- aTTopprjtus Keifievop K€Ka\vfifjLivov,dp€v ments of truth; while ordinary (pojvrjs rri avTov [sc. vlov] ^ouX^ diro- Christians were only ypvxLKol: Giese- KaKvirrofxevav. ler, i. 148, and of. Stieren's note on 2 See Irenseus Contra Hceres. Irenasus, Lib. iii. c. xi. § 9. Lib. III. c. XV. § 2. The following 3 other remnants of the early passage is significant: 'Plurimi Gnostics may possibly be disco- autem et contemtores facti, quasi verable among the *Yezidis,* or jam perfecti, sine reverentia et in * Devil-worshippers* of Armenia: contemtu viventes, semetipsos spi- see Von Haxthausen's Transcau- ritales vocant, et se nosse jam casia, p. 263, Lond. 1854. dicunt eum, qui sit intra Pleroma ^ Ch. Hist. i. 227. ipsorum, refi'igerii locum.' The 22 Christ and other Masters. [part I. a sense-bound race\ insists upon the duty of tui-ning from all outward things to gain a deej)er intuition of God through the perceptions of the mind, and more especially denounces the idea of all particular revelations to a single people, on the ground that they induce contracted and unworthy notions of the Supreme Being. Yet this champion of a purer creed than Christianity, this propagator of more lofty thoughts, which he affected to support by what he terms the ^ inspirations ' of the heathen writers, does not scruple to decry ' the jealous mono- theism of the Christians V apologising even for the worship of the * daemons/ or divine agencies in nature. He treats the history of Christ Himself in a profane spirit, sneers at Christian humility as a debased and stupid misconception of the Platonic sentiment, has no idea of sin except that it is either necessary or unreal, and is therefore at a loss to understand the meaning of redemption^. But the supernatural character of the Christian faith was meanwhile threatened by a more insidious adversary. On the confines of the Church appeared a number of inquiring spirits who were anxious to escape from the prevailing nature- worship, and sustain, if possible, the tottering cause of hea- thenism by giving to it a more spiritual constitution; and from them originated the idea of fusing Christianity with their eclectic system. Affecting to guide mankind into a knowledge of the Absolute, it took the name of JSTeo-Platonism ; and as the founder of it was acquainted with the Gospel, which he once indeed professed*, some precious elements of Christian truth were blended with the empty legends and philosophisings out of which it was compounded. Christ, however, was admitted there as only one of many creatures who had taken rank with the immortals. Pythagoras was to stand on nearly the same level, being honoured by the ^ AetXdj/ KoX Lko(T(hiiaTOv yhos. TLavos kv XpLariavoLS 0LvaTpa(f>eU rois Origen, cont, Gelsum, Lib. vii. p. yovevcnv, ore tov (ppoveXu Kal ttjs 357, ed. Spencer. ^iXoaocpias 7J\paT0, ei)^i>s irpos riju - See the confession of one of his /caret v6/xovs iroXireiav [xere^dXeToi more recent admirers, Mr. Mackay, in Eusebius, Hist. Eccl. vi. 19. lUse and Progress of Christianity, Here, however, as in most other/" p. 159. cases where a search after the Ab-' 3 Of. Neander, as above, pp. 231 solute was undertaken indepen-, sq. dently of revelation, it issued in' * It is curious to notice how Pantheism ; since the Absolute and Porphyry himself, a Neo-Platonist the Personal, the Finite and the opponent of the Gospel, speaks of Infinite, are only reconciled in ; Ammonius Saccas becoming 'a Christ: cf. Maret, as before, pp. thinker:' 'AfjLfidbnos fxev yap Xpia- 145 sq. CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age, 23 Neo-Platonist prafessors as an incarnation of the Deity, who was ' sent to bring down the light of happiness and philosophy for the salvation of the human race \' Some of them asserted also that the genuine teaching of our Lord Himself had har- monised with theirs, but was corrupted by His followers^. Yet they all evinced the heathen bias of their system by repudiating the monotheism of Christianity, by consenting to adapt their doctrines to the grossest forms of popular super- stition, and by teaching that all nations had their own peculiar ' daemons,' whom it was the duty of the masses to propitiate and adore. So plausible were many of the arguments alleged in aid of this religious syncretism that emperors for a while embraced it ; and had Christianity assented to the compromise, the rage of persecution might have ceased. We read that in the private oratory of Severus, Abraham was now associated with Orpheus, and Apollonius of Tyana with our blessed Lord Himself^; and Hadrian, captivated by a similar class of speculations, was anxious at one period to enthrone the Founder of Christianity among the gods of the metropolis, desisting only after he had calculated the profound and sweeping changes which this measure would have certainly produced*. And now the Christian, whose uncompromising temper had survived the calumnies and scoffs, the torture and the flame, of Western heathenism, was called to meet another class of adver- saries, — one that brought to the encounter not only the familiar ^ Such was the language of lam- Christum, Abraham et Orpheum, blichus, one of his biographers: et hujusmodi caeteros habebat, acj Mackay, p. i6i. majorum effigies, rem divinam fa- 2 'Ita enim volunt et ipsum ciebat.' Lampridius, in Fif. ^ever. credi, nescio quid aliud scripsisse, Alex. c. 29. quod diligunt, nihilque sensisse * Ibid. c. 43. Speaking of the contra deos suos, sed eos potius early Christian centuries Mr. Max magico ritu coluisse ; et discipulos Miiller remarks (Bunsen's Univ. ejus non solum de illo fuisse men- Hist. i. 119) : 'It was a period of titos, dicendo ilium Deum, per religious and metaphysical deli- quem facta sint omnia, cum aliud rium, when everything became nihil quam homo f iter it, quamvis everything, when Maya and So- excellentissimae sapientise; verum phia, Mitra and Christ, Viraf and etiam de diis eorum non hoc do- Isaiah, Belus, Zarvan, and Kronos cuisse, quod ab illo didicissent. ' were mixed up in one lumbled S. Augustin. de Consensu Evange- system of inane speculation, from listanim, Lib. i. § 52, ed. Bened. which at last the East was de- ^ ' Matutinis horis in larario suo livered by the positive doctrines in quo et divos principes, sed op- of Mohammed, the West by the times, electos, et animas sanctiores, pure Christianity of the Teutonic in quels et ApoUonium, et, quantum nations. ' scriptor suorum temporum dicit, 24* Christ and other Masters, [part I. mythes of pagan Greece and Rome, but tortuous subtleties and buge abstractions, which had long engaged the pensive and ascetic spirits of the East. The pure and lofty Theism of the Church already, it is true, had vanquished many forms of Eastern speculation, when the earliest race of Gnostics had been driven from the field of controversy. Still another and more formidable series of attacks, all aiming to confound the Gospel with the old religions of Asia, date their rise from the appear- ance of the Persian Mani, who flourished at the opening of the ; fourth century. His main position^ is, that on comparing the systems of Zoroaster and Buddha with that of Jesus Christ, the same divine ingredients are observable in all, though under various shades and modifications. Hence it was proposed to bring about a reconciliation of the three systems, or rather to incorporate the older creeds with what had been more recently revealed in Christianity. Mani was himself to be the organ of God (the 'Paraclete') for carrying on this fresh development, and one of his chief duties was to purify the intellects of men in order that they might be rescued from all servile bondage to the past, and more particularly from what was held to be a special artifice of the evil principle, the Old Testament oeconomy. To promote this separation he affirmed that inspirations granted to himself enabled him to point out what was merely human, transitory, or accommodated to the prejudices of the Jewish people, in the records of the New Testament; his dictum being pressed on all as absolutely infallible, because it was affirmed that he in his own person represented the last progress in the knowledge of religious truth. But Mani, though he struggled hard and was supported by a train of energetic followers, could not shake the constancy of the more earnest Christians. They perceived that his religion was erected on a fundamental mis- conception, and was utterly antagonistic to their own. He started with ideas of God and His relation to the world, which if not absolutely pantheistic bordered very closely upon pan- theism, and must result in it eventually. His Ahriman they felt was not the Satan of the Bible. But they saw still more distinctly that if his principles were true, they would produce an utter severance of the Old and New Testaments. These they had been taught to recognise as equally divine, as so indissolubly bound together and so mutually interpenetrating that to rob them of the first would be to tear the second into shreds and tatters. 1 Cf. Neander, Clu Hist. ii. 157 sq. CHAP. I.] Eeligioiis Tendencies of the present Age. 25 We occasionally encounter the descendants of such mis- believers even during the inertness of the Mediaeval period. As many tenets of the Neo-Platonist were re-adopted in the ninth century by John Scotus Erigena^ so the errors of the Manichsean^ found a simultaneous echo in the pulpits of Pauli- cians, Cathari, and Albigenses. Other instances might be col- lected from the annals of the following period ; but as soon as the study of the pagan poets and philosophers revived, the general tendency of thought was somewhat different. Oriental speculations were less known, and writers like Boccaccio^ prove their heathenish turn of mind, by using heathen phraseology to designate the highest mysteries of Holy Writ, and otherwise promoting the amalgamation of the two religions. Prayers are offered in the most offensive spirit to Jupiter, to Juno, and to Venus. The incarnation of Hhe son of Jupiter' is mentioned; he is said to have visited the earth, that he might forward its redemption. Other scholars^ of this stamp pro- ceed yet further; they place our blessed Lord in juxtaposition with Socrates and Plato, identify the Persons of the Holy Trinity with heathen deities, and under the patronage of the Medici at Florence threaten to obliterate the characteristic doctrines of the Gospel, or confound them with the theories of Greek philosophy^. With the Reformation of the sixteenth century, levelling as it did so many of the ancient boundaries of human thought, and breaking off so many time-worn fetters, came a signal for the reappearance of free-thinkers still more cognate with misguided zealots of the present day. Servetus and the rest of 1 See a recent article in the ^ This may be seen especially in North British Review, No. xlv. pp. the Filocolo (al. Filocojio), where, 12 1, sq. The writer shews, how- as Sismondi (Liter, of Southern ever, that Scotus 'never lost his Europe, i. 300) has remarked, Boc- faith entirely either in the person- caccio * seems determined to con- ahty of God or in the supernatural found the two religions, and to teaching of the Bible.' prove that they are in fact the same 2 The following extract from a worship, under different names.' Formula lieceptionis Manichceorum ^ Koscoe's Life of Leo X., .u. belonging to the period, shews that 87, 88. Hence the frightful growth Buddha, Mdni, Zoroaster, Christ of infidelity at Eome itself imme- and the Sun, were then treated diately before the Eeformation : see, as different manifestations of the for instance, Erasmus, Epist. Hb. same power: ^AvaOefxari^io robs rhv xxvi. ep. 34, ed. Le Clerc. Tiapdbav Kol BouSai/ koL tov 'Kpiarou ^ Cf. the determinations of the KalTbv'M.auLxouoif,KaiT6v7}\i.ov,(:vaKcd Council of Lateran, Labbe, xiv. rbv avrov elvai Xiyovras. Tollius, 188. Itiner. Italic. -p. 134. Traject. 1696. 26 Christ and other Masters, [part I. the ^Illuminati' were, in fact, precursors of the English spiri- tualists ^ Thej all opposed themselves to the idea of an objective revelation, often substituting for the Holy Scriptures the distempered products of their own imaginations, and claiming the infallible guidance of the Holy Spirit, whom, in cases where the plea was more convenient, they represented as superior in authority even to the Lord Himself. Their utter subjectivity involved them also in the absolute denial of the cardinal doctrines promulgated by the Church, impelled them to devise eccentric institutions, and assert that 'every man shall be saved by the law or sect which he professeth^.' It was not, however, till the following century that men of learning and intelligence were seriously possessed by the desire of founding what is called an Absolute Keligion. Lord Herbert of Cherbury was the first in England who approxi- mated closely to the ground of Mr. Parker. Grievously perplexed by the phenomena of heathenism, he entered on the task of sifting the peculiarities of all religions. Out of the residuum he attempted to compile a creed ^, consisting of five simple articles, which all the world, he ventured to predict, would recognise as true, and deem sufiicient as a term of com- munion and a warrant of salvation. Many of his followers in that century and the next proceeded to far greater lengths*. In Tindal, Collins, Blount, ^ See the eyidence collected in pro veris indubitatisque habere de- Mr. Riddle's Bampton Lectures bent.' De Relrqione Gentilium, p. (1852), pp. 394 sq. The error there 2, Amstel. 1663. This treatise, noted of CasteUio, who 'separated together with its companion De Scripture from the Spirit,' has been Veritate pubUshed as early as 1624, very common both before and since has been examined at length by the Reformation. Thus Milton Leland, in his useful View of the hinted (Prose TForA;s, IV. 449, Bohn's Principal Deistical Writers (xviith ed.) that 'the Spirit which is given andxviiith cent.), 5th ed. 1798. See us is a more certain guide than also on the general question of Scripture, whom, therefore, it is mod^ern Deism, the sketch given our duty to follow.' by Van Mildert in his Boyle Lee- 2 Art. XVIII. of the xxxix. The tures (1802— 1805), Lect. ix. — Lect. Scottish Confession of 1560 speaks xii. inhkemanner, 'of those that affirm, ^ In speaking of Tindal, whose that men quhilk live according to Christianity as old as the Creation equitie and justice, shall be saved, first appeared in 1730, Leland what religioun soever they have pro- remarks (i. 127): 'Others have fessed,' in Knox's Works, 11. 108, attacked particular parts of the ed. Laing. Christian scheme, or of its proofs. ^ After announcing his own five But this writer has endeavoured articles, he adds : ' quos non nostri to subvert the very foundations of tantum sed universi Orbis coetus it, by shewing that there neither is CHAP. I.] Eeligious Tendencies of the present Age. 27 Chubb, "Woolston, and Bolingbroke at home ; and in Dupui?, Yoltaire, and D'Alembert on the continent, we find a class of writers who resolved at every hazard, and with confidence^ proportioned to their daring, to destroy the credibility of Holy Writ, to ponr contempt on all external revelations, and conduct us back if possible to heathenism, or Hhe religion of nature'.' But in vain ; the truth of God was still victorious. Notwith- standing the depressed condition of theology, and notwithstand- ing the corrupted spirit and materialistic temper of the age, the flood of intellectual licence was again rolled back. The ark still rode in conscious majesty upon the bosom of the surging nor can be any external revelation at all, distinct from what he calls the internal revelation of the laio of nature in the hearts of all mankind,'' &c. Tindal was a veritable fore- runner of the spiritualists. 'He sometimes speaks as if he thought the deists were infallibly guided, in making use of the reason God hath given, to distinguish religion from superstition, so that they are sure not to run into any errors of moment' (p. 128). Other persons who were in favour of an external revelation he called 'Demonists.' ^ Thus, when Dupuis published his Origine de tous les Cultes, the volume on Christianity started with the boast, 'qui doit faire une revo- lution dans le monde religieux et dans le culte de plusieurs grandes nations' (ed. Auguis, v. i). He tells us immediately after, 'Christ serapournous ce qu'ont ^te Hercule, Osiris, Adonis, Bacchus. H par- tagera en commun avec eux le culte que tous les peuples de tous les pays et de tous les siecles ont rendu a la Nature universelle et a ses agens principaux.' ^ ' The present unbelievers,' writes Waterland ( * Wisdom of the Ancients,' Works, v. 4), 'are setting up what they call natural religion to rival supernatural: hu- man reason in the heart of man, in opposition to Divine reason laid down in the Word of God; or to say all in short. Pagan darkness in opposition to Scripture light.' The kind of worship which these heralds of the Absolute Religion would fain establish in the room of what they found among the Christians of their times, may be gathered from An Apology for pro- fessing the Religion of Nature in the Eighteenth Century of the Chris- tian JEra (Twelve Letters address- ed to Bishop Watson), 1789. The author then adds A Liturgy on the Principles of Theism 'in which philosophers might join without insulting their understandings or corrupting their hearts.' The 'First Service' commences thus: 'Powerful Ruler of the Universe! whatever Thou art — whether Nature necessarily existing; or the ani- mating spirit of mortals, — we adore Thee, who by impenetrable methods conductest all things to Thy pur- poses.'. . . . The 'First Service' ends: — • 'Despotic government has not produced a tyrant; human nature has not generated a monster, so cruel, so revengeful, so wicked as the odious phantom to which superstition is devoted ! ' In the 'Second Service' (p. 195), the pantheism is avowed. ' How shall we speak of Nature, or of Nature's God! Everything tends to convince us, we should not, for we cannot seek the Deity out of Nature. Everything to us is impossible which is not produced by its laws.' 28 Christ and other Masters. [part I. waters ; wliile many rival systems, fabricated in compliance with ' the instincts of humanity/ and directed by * the light of nature,' perished in the storm they had provoked. It is remark- able that not a few of the objections ventilated at this period by the English ^Deists' found their way across the channel, and in Germany communicated a fresh impulse to the National- istic movement ^ They are now returning home, etherialised indeed, and moulded into more fantastic shapes, although substantially the same objections as before. England once the master has become the ardent, apt, and credulous disciple ; and when numbers of our brethren on the continent are just emerging from the fogs of scepticism and welcoming the earliest dawn of better days, it seems as though the English were re- solved to venture out again into the same dreary regions, — only to be taught again the utter fruitlessness of all endeavours to resolve the arduous problems of humanity without the aid of Holy Writ. Impelled by the necessity of coping with these wild and retrogressive tendencies, the Christian advocate has never shrunk from the encounter, and has seldom found his labours altogether unsuccessful. He may not indeed be always guided by a sound discretion ; he may fail to understand the nature of the malady in certain cases, and in others may suggest an antidote that does not work its cure ; but still his consciousness of the profound importance of the issue has been ever visible. He feels that to reduce our blessed Lord into the category of human seers is practically to dethrone Him. Christianity will tolerate no riyal. They who wish to raise a tabernacle for some other master, be it even for the greatest worthies of the old (Economy, — a Moses or Elias, — must be warned that Christ, and Christ alone, is to be worshipped : they must hear Him. The Eastern Church, as we have seen, appeared at first to use Iqss emphasis in their assertion of this truth than the con- temporary Latin writers ; or rather by evincing a disposition to multiply the points of contact between Christianity and other systems, and so recognising a prophetic element in G-etitilism, they gave a handle to the laxer party who had little or no reverence even for the character of Christ. But all such tenderness for the religions of the heathen world was everywhere forgotten in the Middle Ages^. They who issued ^ Tholuck has drawn attention ^ 'vVhen Bede was pressed with to this fact in his Glaubwurdigkeit the objection that many heathen der evangel. Gescli. : cf. also Mr. philosophers had evinced a large iUddle's Bampton Lectures, p. 397. amount of moral sensibility, he CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 29 forth to plant the cross among the northern and eastern nations, had to deal with men who were not absolutely hostile to the Saviour, but who recognised in Him no more than a pre- eminently gracious Being to be added to the number of their dark divinities^ or else esteemed the Gospel only one manifesta- tion of the Absolute akin to their own religions^ : and hence the ardent missionary, full of zeal, though sometimes wanting in intelligence, was tempted to commence his exhortations by decrying all their gods as evil spirits, and exaggerating the guilt of their departed ancestors. A milder tone, however, grew more common at the period of the Reformation. Many rose to advocate the salvability of the nobler class of heathen, gloried to have found sublimer thoughts in their philosophers, or more tender precepts in their poets, and even went so far as to maintain, that some of them had access to the highest truths, and were instructed by the Word of God unwritten. A most zealous Swiss reformer^ on the one side and a learned bibliothe- carius^ of the Koman pontiff on the other, represented this new answered that none who were ig- norant of Christ, the virtue of God and the wisdom of God, could have either true virtue or true wisdom. Yet he adds: 'In quan- tum vero vel gustum aliquem sa- pientiee cujuslibet vel virtutis ima- ginem habebant, totum hoc desuper acceperunt; non solum munere primse conditionis, verum etiam quotidiana ejus gratia, qui crea- turam suam nee se deserentem deaerens, dona sua, prout ipse judicaverit hominibus et magna magnis et parva largitur parvis.' Expositio in Cant. Canticorum; 0pp. IX. 197, ed. Giles. ^ See an example in Neander, V. 397. 2 See the striking testimony of a Franciscan missionary in Eay- nald. Annal. Eccl. ad an. 1326, §31- •* Walter (Gualther) was under the necessity of defending Zwingli on account of the freedom with which he had praised the heathen poets and philosophers, which ex- posed him to the charge of rank- ing idolaters and Epicureans with the Christian saints. The apolo- gist then proceeds: *Cum vero illud [i.e. Verbum Dei] non vacuum redire, nee fructu suo carere dicat Bominus, nemo opinor negabit plures ex gentibus quoque ad sa- lutem pervenisse, si nimirum eos Dei verbo vel externa vel interna aliquo modo instructos fuisse de- monstraverimus,' &c. Pref . to Zwin- gli's Works, ed. 1545, sign, e, 4. Cf. Browne, On the Articles^ 11. 75. Erasmus and others used similar language : Hey, Lectures, 11. 360. 4 The De Perenni Fhilosophia of Augustinus Steuchus Eugubi- nus, titular bishop of Kisamos, was published at Basle in 1542. His principles may be gathered from Lib. X. c. 23: * Claret igitur post multa secula missam diuinitus Theologiam, nihil aliud fuisse quam priscorum seculorum caligantis iam et obscura), quam animis hominum impresserat Deus, et uoce sua in creatione, post in secuto tempore per nuncios tradiderat, scientiie reuelationem. Neque enim fieri potest, quod postea ccelitus est apertum, quodque perfecte decla- raturus uenit e co^lo in terras Deus, ante aduentum eius alia ratione 30 Christ and other Masters, [part I. phase of thought. The latter even did not hesitate to urge that the philosophy of the ancients was a kind of * tacit Christianity,' and that the promulgation of the Gospel only took away the inmost veil and brought us into full communi- cation with the source of supernatural truth. Since then the records of the ancient world have been repeatedly examined in order to obtain fresh light for the determination of these questions. Theophilus Gale endeavoured to establish \ Hhat the proud sophists of Greece, esteemed the eye of the world for wisdom,' were 'fain to come and light their candles at the sacred fire, which was lodged in the Jewish Church.' While Cudworth, * anxious to satisfy those amongst us who boggle so much at the Trinity, and look upon it as the choke-pear of Christianity^,' employed his deep and ponderous einidition in maintaining that a similar doctrine was known among the Platonists ; this being, in fact, one only out of many con- sequences that resulted from the co-existence of a true philo- sophy external to the sphere of revelation. But with Cudworth, it should be remembered, such a view in no wise tended to discredit the Old Testament, or to excite the faintest prejudice against it. In the present day the same investigation is actively proceeding ; and now that every corner of the heathen world has been explored, a somewhat different explanation of celebre fuisse quam eadem ipsa i Court of the Gentiles ^ 'Adver- quod diuinitus esset traditum.' In tisements to the Reader.' 1548 appeared the ITzsior /a de (Ziis ^Intellectual System^ Pref. p. gentilibus of Greg. Sylv. Gyraldus ; xUii., cf. 11. 428 sq. But in making in allusion to which Eckermann, out as good a case as possible for Religionsgeschichteund Mythologies the heathen, whose polytheism he I. 12 (Halle, 1848), remarks: 'Schon appears to have considered as little seit dem Anfange des sechszehn- more than a monotheism in dis- ten Jahrhunderts hatte man he- guise, this great writer confounded sonders in Italien angefangen, die the religion of ancient nations with Theologie und die Mythologie des the theological opinions of the heidnischen Alterthums in man- leading poets and philosophers: nigfaltige nahere Beziehung zu see Mosheim's note, in Vol. 11. p. setzen. Man fing an zwischen 251. Coleridge was nearer to the den Mythen des Heidenthums und truth, when he wrote as follows: den Sagen des Alten Testaments 'Across the night of Paganism, Vergleichungen anzustellen, und philosophy flitted on, like the griindete namentlich die Ansicht, lantern-fly of the Tropics, a light dass Bammtliche polytheistische to itself, and an ornament, but Religionem nur als Abartungen alas ! no more than an ornament aus, Oder AbfaUe von dem He- of the surrounding darkness. Chris- braischenMonotheismusanzusehen tianity reversed the order.' Aids seien, und war emsig bemiiht, to Rejlection, i. 146, Pickering's dieselbe auf gelehrte Weise zu be- ed. giiinden.' CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. 81 the correspondencies between the Gentile and Christian systems has been generally adopted, at least by all those writers who preserve the ancient reverence for the Bible. There is now no general wish among the orthodox to trace such parallelisms exclusively to the diffusion of the Hebrew Scriptures ^ There is even less occasion to suspect that any critical pressure will be used for bringing the philosophy of heathenism into more perfect unison with the distinctive doctrines of the Church. Yet on the other hand the features of resemblance, few and dim and fragmentary though they be, are welcomed as so many testimonies to the truth of revelation — as * unconscious pro- })hecies of heathendom,' or else as portions of that spiritual heritage which men and tribes bore with them from the cradle of the human race. A living writer^ has observed, that ' the noblest and most effectual way of defending Christianity is not to condemn everything which preceded it, — to turn all the virtues of distinguished heathens into splendid vices, — but rather to make them testify in its favour.' Such is also my conviction; and with kindred feelings I now purpose to reopen the investigation of those leading facts and the analysis of those ideas of heathenism which the opponents of Christianity have been accustomed to adduce as parallel to what is found in the sacred volume, and as, there- fore, placing Gentile systems on a level with the Church of God. Such points of correspondency, where they in truth exist, I hold to be explainable without in any way diminishing the lustre of the Gospel or detracting in the least degree from ^ The evidence that can be urged regie des moeurs la plus severe, in favour of this view has been Je suis loin de penser, toutefois, recently collected in Mr. Tomkins's que dans la morale reside toute Hulsean Prize Essay (1849). I'essence de la religion; je sais au ^ SchafI, Ch. Hist. i. 168. It contraire que les plus nobles ames, is gratifying to remark that Creu- et les peuples les plus memorables zer in his elaborate Symbolik, des temps anciens et modernes, though he manifests no very de- ont demand^ a cette derniere des cided prepossessions in favour of lumieres plus hautes sur le mystere Christianity, is not influenced by de notre existence et sur nos futures any fanatical dislike of it, and that destinees. Entretoutes les religions the French scholar (M. Guigniaut) connues, le christianisme me parait who translated and enlarged the avoir le mieux satisf ait a ce double work of Creuzer is of the same besoin del'homme: mais, soit dans mind. For example, he echoes sa doctrine, soit dans les formes de the following sentiment: 'Pour son culte, il avait et6 et avait dft moi,' dit M. Creuzer, *la meilleure etre prepare par les religions ante- religion est celle qui conserve avec rieures.' Religions de VAntiquite, la plus grande purete le caractere *Avertiseement,' p. 7. moral et prescrit aux peuples la 32 Christ and other Masters, [part I. the supremacy wHcli it enjoys in the affections of the Chris- tian world. The order I propose to follow in discussing the religious systems where minute comparison has been thought desirable^, is this :— The Religions that arose and still prevail in Hindustan and some adjoining countries. The Religions of Mexico, of China, and the Southern Seas, Both these groups appear to have always been entirely external to the sphere of Hebrew influence. The Religions of Ancient Egypt and Persia. These, it is alleged, have both at different periods actually modified the development of thought among the Hebrews; the first, during their long residence in Egypt; the second, during the Babylonish captivity. The Religions of Ancient Greece and Rome. With these the planters of Christianity were brought into immediate contact at the very opening of their work, and over these they won a triumph in the first ^ve centuries of the present era. The Religions of the Saxon, Scandinavian, and Slavonic tribes. Among these tribes the principles of heathenism appear to have been strongest; and some of them in fact were not con- verted to Christianity for a thousand years after its promul- gation. But before proceeding to determine the characteristics of these several groups^, on each of which I purpose to bestow a ^ If it be asked why Muham- p. 105). The plan proposed by madanism is not included in the one reviewer is to take the three- series, my reply is, that I consider fold division of the human race, it a dehased form of revealed re- the Semitic, the Aryan, and the ligion, — a Christian, or more pro- Turanian, and assuming that the perly, a Jewish heresy. Paret, in spheres of language and religion the Studien und Kritlken, 1855, are generally conterminous to ar- -ztes Heft, p. 295, calls it *eine range all the religions of which we niedere-Abart Oder, wenn man will, have any authentic information Abklatsch der Offensbarungs-reli- under these three different heads, gion.' 'There is the Semitic family with 2 Objections have been urged its spiritual monotheism, the Aryan against this arrangement on the family with its worship of nature, gi-ound that it does not recognise and the Chinese and Turanian races *the great watersheds of thought with their vague belief in a Divine and language vrhich divide the Being, neither spiritual nor natural, principal families of the human but hovering in its ghostly unreality race' {Col. Ch. Chr. March, 1858, between heaven and earth, filling CHAP. I.] Religious Tendencies of the present Age. S3 separate investigation, it is necessary to my argument that certain other points should be established. These will be com- prised in two preliminary chapters. One of them has reference to the question touching the unity of the human race — a question intimately bound up with my present subject. For if it be in any measure probable that all varieties of men originated in a single pair, I shall be pro tanto justified in urging this important fact, as one medium of accounting for traditions which were afterwards diffused through all the human family. The second point concerns what may be called the charac- teristic features of the Old Testament religion, and its vital coherence with the system founded in and by our blessed Lord. For if this close connexion be established, I am able to pointy out the ancient germ and nucleus of which Christianity be- came the true development; and if the principles pervading both the stages of Kevealed Religion be fundamentally the same, a standard will have been erected in the ancient world whereby to estimate the real character and tendencies of those contemporary religions, which, as we shall see hereafter, sprang up wild in different soils of paganism. the human heart -with fear and superstition, but unable to inspire its votaries with the joy and con- fidence of the Aryan suppliant, or the awe and reverence of the Sem- itic worshipper. ' But this criticism, even if the counter- thecJiy could be established, seems to emanate from a miscon- ception of the work on which I am now occupied. I am not writing a history of all religions, but am comparing the chief religions of heathendom with Christianity or Eevealed Eeligion. That is my centre. CHAPTER 11. On the Unity of the Human Race. 'Quanquam in hoc ipso non mediocriter peccent quod non hominis causa dicunt, sed hominum. Unius enim singularis appellatio totum comprehendit humanum genus. Sed hoc ideo, quia ignorant unum hominem a Deo esse formatum, putantque homines in omnibus terris et agris, tanquam fungos, esse generates.' Lactantius, Divin. Instit. lib. VII. c. 4. Impugners of the unity of the human race. Mitigation of these assaults. Reasons of the change. Objections. Ansivers. Mental and moral prO' perties common to man. Universal response to the appeals of Christi' anity. Objections answered. Explanation of physiological varieties. Objection i. Answer. Objection 11. Answer. Classification of human languages. Are these three groups reducible to one? Philology has not answered the question. Its bearing on the truthfulness of the Bible. Gradual formation of heathen theologies. Their infinite variety. Truth and unity in the Church. The object of this chapter is to indicate, as briefly as may be, the general nature of the evidence producible in favour of the oneness of the human species, or the derivation of the various tribes of man from one common stock^ I cannot hope to enter far into the details of so vast a question; nor indeed will it be necessary. For the main conditions of the argument are satisfied, if I can prove that modern sciences, so far from damaging in this respect the credibility of the sacred record, are all tending to establish and confirm it. In other words, I shall be content with shewing that researches of the present ^ Any comparative view of the creatures vrith the same Divine rehgions of the world would be Being who is over all. Hence the valueless, indeed philosophically questions of the unity of the human impossible, unless we may regard race and the unity of God, as vin- them as all concerned with one dicated in the Old Testament, are subject-matter ; contemplate them preliminary to our mata invesiiga- as phenomena of the spiritual re- tion. lations of the same class of rational CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race. 85 age conspire to warrant a belief in the original unity of men, and therefore serve to justify the expectation, that traditions current in the various tribes and peoples of antiquity had very much in common, having emanated from the same primordial source. During the last century, when scepticism of every kind was rampant, and when France was in particular embarking on her infidel crusade against all noble theories of man, of God, and of the universe, the fashion was to scoff at this idea of con- sanguinity among the different nations of the globe. Language was regarded as a mere conventional apparatus gradually devised by the untutored savage: * positive religions' were decried as engines of a crafty priesthood, or as 'heresies' of what was called Hhe religion of nature:' while man himself had been reduced to little more than one of the varieties of animal life. The same degrading notions led the French Encyclopedists to deny not only the objectivity of human nature, but the common origin of men. It will be found that all intelligent belief in the unity of the human race is naturally associated with belief in God's own unity and paternity, with real con- sciousness of sin, with ardent longings for redemption, and particularly with a recognition of the fact, that Christ and the apostles planted a religious system which provides for men of every age and climate, and is capable of indefinite expansion. These truths the unbelievers of the last century assailed with blasphemous vituperation : and, therefore, we are not surprised to hear them advocating the hypothesis of independent human species. According to Yoltaire, none but a blind man can doubt, that the whites, negroes, Albinos, Hottentots, Laplanders, Chinese and Americans, are entirely distinct races. Since that time, however, there has been a vast reaction in the mind of European scholars. It is true, assailants are not wanting who repeat among ourselves the oft-exploded cavils of the French Encyclopedists. The most cultivated nations are still said to have been formed in the very lowest grade of savage life, and to have struggled year by year into their present stage of moral, social, and religious elevation; passing from the grossest Fetishism to a refined and flexible Polytheism, and so upwards, till they were at last enabled, by some means or other, to evolve the true idea of God\ But even where these principles of ^ So think M. Comte, Mr. F. W. p. 65), that in the very oldest re- Newman, and many others, re- cords, *we often find symptoms of gardlesR of the fact, conceded even a more distinct conception of Di- l»y jVIr. W. J. Fox (Religious Ideas^ vine grandeur and infinity than 3~-2 Christ and other Masters. [part 1. development are entertained, their authors do not speak so positively as the sceptics of the former age, against the oneness of the human family^; while others who refuse on different grounds to acquiesce in the scriptural account of man's origin, have, notwithstanding, been constrained by philosophical reasons to postpone their judgment on the subject^. Modern science has in fact materially contributed, in this case also, to revive the lustre and to vindicate the truth of revelation. She has wrested from the grasp of unbelief a number of its choicest weapons, and has wielded them against itself with irresistible effect. In the first place, Cuvier^, by a series of historical and geological researches, proved that man has not been very long an occupant of the earth; that none of the existing varieties can trace their origin beyond the point at which the Bible seems to place the introduction of the human species; and, therefore, that the modern theory of * creative laws,' acting by * myriads of ages,' is adverse to the facts of history and the prevailed in later ages.' Alex, von Humboldt {Cosmos, ii. 113) seems to shrink from expressing any posi- tive opinion either way; and yet instances of tribes relapsing into a savage and ahnost brutal state are not unfrequent; e.g. the Bush- men of Southern Africa. ^ Thus Mr. Theodore Parker {Discourse, &c., p. 75) acknowledges *the identity of the human race/ which refers, however, to ideas and sentiments common to mankind, without implying, in his opinion, the doctrine of a common origin. He also admits that the view in favour of several originating pairs is equally without any direct his- torical proof. It is afterwards added : 'No one can determine what was the primitive state of the human race, or when, or where, or how mankind, at the command of God, came into existence. Here our conclusions can be only negative,' (p. 76) : i.e. after we have rejected the evidence of the Bible and ex- tinguished the traditions of the ancient world, we find ourselves in utter darkness. ^ Niebuhr, for example {Led. on Ancient History, 1. 6, Lond. 1852), evades the consideration of the main problem in the following passage : 'Whether all nations were originally of different origin and belonged to different races, or whe- ther their original identity were changed in form and language by a series of miracles, these are ques- tions which do not belong to an- cient history; and we must leave to others to discuss them. With- out a direct and minute revelation from God, we cannot arrive at any certain results on these points, and in reference to them the Book of Genesis cannot be considered as a revelation.' William von Hum- boldt seems to have hesitated in like manner to the very close of his life (see Chev. Bunsen's Out- lines of the Philosophy of Universal History, i. 59, 60, Lond. 1854); but his illustrious brother, the author of Cosmos, obviously in- clines to the hypothesis of unity: see I. 351, Sabine's edition. 3 Essay on the Theory of the Earth, ed. Jameson, §§ 30 sq. CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race. 87 phenomena of science. Mr Lyell' rendered similar service to the cause of Christian truth, when he demolished the analogous theory of Lamarck, which represented man as one of the numerous links in a graduated chain of beings, successively developed into higher stages; his bodily organism being a modification of the ape, and his mental prerogatives no more than the expanded form of faculties which he enjoys in common with the brute creation. But what has tended most of all perhaps to silence the objections of the antichristian * philoso- phers,' are the strange affinities which have been brought to light by the investigations of comparative philology. When India fell into the hands of Britain, and a class of enterprising scholars, headed by Sir William Jones, began to work the precious mines of history which that conquest opened to the western world, it was established that the 'Aryan' race be- yond the Indus spoke a language fundamentally akin to that of Germany and England. Other languages, in which affinity had hitherto been unsuspected, were also found to range them- selves within the same group; an Aryan, or Indo-European, family was constituted; and as the new principles of classifica- tion were extended into wider regions, it grew obvious that all known varieties of human language, once a dreary chaos, were reducible into a small number of harmonious groups; while in these groups themselves, some evidence was thought to be detected of a radical connexion, such as leads to the belief that all are only modifications of an older and more general type. Meanwhile a different process had been leading to the same result. Comparative physiology was moving hand in hand with comparative philology. The skill and industry of Blumenbach"^ in that department, served to shew that in respect of their physical structure and the laws of their animal ceconomy, the varieties of the human race are in like manner all reducible to a very few groups; and Prichard^, by a happy combination of these sciences, was able to push forward the great problem, and, as some imagined, went so far as to establish the original oneness of the human family. ^ Principles of Geology, iii. 4 sq. Getting. 1775: but his examination 6th ed. : cf . Prof. Sedgwick's Dis- and comparison of skulls proceeded course on the Studies of the Uni- until 1828. versity of Cambridge^ Pref. pp. ^ See his Researches into the xviii. sq. 5th ed. Physical History of Mankind, 3rd 2 His great work is entitled Be ed. Generis Humani varietate nativa. 88 Christ and other Masters. [part I. Several lines of proof must, therefore, be regarded as con- verging to the point in question: — (1) the Scriptural, (2) the Psychological, (3) the Physiological, (4) the Philological. 1. Scriptural Proof. I should have judged it quite superfluous to insist upon this head in dealing with avowed assailants of dogmatic Chris- tianity; but there is reason to believe that several persons who revere the Bible as in some degree a supernatural record, strenuously deny the derivation of the human family from one single pair. Thus, when Professor Agassiz^ is reminded of St. Paul's assertion, that ' God hath made of one blood ^ all nations of men, for to dwell on all the face of the earth' (Acts xvii. 26), his answer is, that this * figurative expression applies to the higher unity of mankind, and not to their supposed genital connexion by natural descent.' He also argues that the Book of Genesis, to which allusion is here made by the apostle, ' must be considered as relating chiefly to the history of the white i-ace, w^ith special reference to the history of the Jews.' Now both these statements seem to me most arbitrary and evasive. (1) Until it has been shewn that such expressions as ' made of blood ' are used to signify any species of relation or descent, save that of natural generation^, we are scarcely justi- fied in seeking for a figurative import. St. Paul there told the men of Athens, among whom polytheism had grown into a sort of passion, that God was really one, the single Lord, the abso- lute Creator of the universe. He next proceeded to announce the great correlative truth, that God has left an image of His own oneness in the oneness of humanity; and that this fact was certified by the production of the human species from one common stock^. All nations were declared to be His offspring; 1 See his contribution to the i. 13. Neither, as St. Paul in- Christian Examiner (American), structs us elsewhere, could it be July, 1850, pp. 135 — 137. This predicated of all men indiscrimin- periodical is an organ of the Boston ately ; for according to him the Unitarians. unconverted Gentiles (Eph. iv. 17, ^ A second reading, adopted by 18) are still * alienated from the Lachmann, omits at/xaTos altoge- life of God through the ignorance ther. that is in them.' ^ The only 'higher unity' con- * See Neander's excellent para- necting men together, is the spi- phrase {Planting y i. 192, Lond. ritual nature they derive in com- 1851). * In the polytheistic stand- mon by regeneration from Christ, ing-point,' he adds (note), 'a know- the New Head of humanity : but ledge of the unity of human nature this birth is most expressly said is wanting, because it is closely to be 'not of blood' {al/xdTcjv)^ John connected with a knowledge of the CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race, 89 since they all were sons of Adam, * which was the son of God ' (Luke iii. 3B). (2) The second argument is equally unfounded, inconsistent with the general tenour of the sacred narrative, the statements of particular texts, and all the varied prophecies of redemption. Who in reading the Book of Genesis, without a theory in his eye, is likely to suspect that he is tracing out the origin and early fortunes of one section of the human race? Our first mother was herself called Eve, because (the sacred penman has been careful to inform us) ' she was the mother of all living ' (Gen. iii. 20) : and whenever it was subsequently foretold how the disasters that had overwhelmed her progeny should termi- nate on the appearance of some Great Deliverer, every nation from the rising of the sua to the going down thereof, all tribes, wherever scattered and however brutalised, are said to be the objects whom He comes to bless and rescue, to exalt and re- unite. And with this view the writings of the New Testament entirely correspond. Adam is there represented as a * caput gentis,' whose descendants constitute the self-same race that has been reconstructed in the second Adam\ * As by the disobedience of the one (rov kvo^), the many (ot ttoWoX) were made sinners, so by the obedience of the one shall the many be made righteous' (Rom. v. 19). ^As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive' (1 Cor. xv. 22). In Him unity of God : ' and when it is the representative of human nature remembered how the Athenians in its natural and fallen state.' boasted that they were avroxOove^, But such interpretation of St. Paul's the drift of St. Paul's observation language seems to me unjustifiable, is still more obvious. Cf. on the Adam is affirmed to be the origin of whole of this wonderful speech death to all men, just as strictly as Baumgarten, Acts of the Apostles^ our blessed Lord ig the origin of II. 157 sq. Edinb. 1854. life (i Cor xv. 21, 22); and unless ^ When Mr. F. W. Newman calls it be contended that in St. Paul's in question the oneness of the teaching Christ is only the re'pre* human family, and asks what in sentative of redeemed humanity, that case 'becomes of St. Paul's and not the actual bringer-in of parallel between the first and second the redemption, Adam must be Adam, and the doctrine of headship also far more than a representative ; and atonement founded on it;' a seo Eom. v. 19, where the paral- writer in the Quarterly Review (No. lelism is most remarkable. I ought cxc. p. 474, note) attempts to meet to add, however, that the Quart- the difficulty by replying that, *even erly Bevieicer does not admit the if mankind had not descended from truth of Mr. Newman's hypothesis, a single pair, the truths laid down He holds that scientific research by St. Paul in the passage referred has established ' the extreme proba- to would be untouched; for when bility' of a single origin for all the he speaks of all men as dead in human family. Adam, he is speaking of Adam as 40 Christ and other Masters. [part I. the course of degradation that commenced with Adam, and was tending to dissever man from man, and one community from another, is arrested and reversed. Humanity has found a second Head, a nobler Kepresentative : it is generically bom again in Christ; and, therefore, all the individual members of the species, Jew or Greek, barbarian, Scythian, bond or free, are made susceptible of Christian influences. ' Go ye,' was the charge of Him, who is the ^ Second Man,' * the Lord from Heaven,' (Mark xvi. 15,) * Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature {irddrj ry Kxto-ct);' 'for we know,' writes the Apostle (Rom. viii. 22), Hhat the whole creation [Trdcra tj ktiuls) groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.' 2. Psychological Proof. This argument depends entirely on the fact that, notAvith- standing every minor variation in feeling or capacity, in taste or temperament, by which we are enabled to distinguish one people from another, there are certain moral, spiritual, and mental elements, inherent in humanity itself, and underlying all the national types and local characteristics. At first indeed, when our attention is directed to the subject, a picture meets us not of unity but of diversity. We everywhere encounter groups of human beings, each l^etraying some T)eculiar tend- encies, with manners as dissimilar as their physical con- formation; with intellectual habits, indicating all degrees of power and culture; with sentiments, in one case, harsh and barbarous, in a second, gentle, tender, and refined : — a class of variations warranting, as we might judge, the supposition that each separate group is radically independent, and ha,s always formed an independent species. But more thoughtful obser- vation leads us to abandon this hypothesis as crude and super- ficial. It enables us to see that Yerj many of these wide diversities exist at present, and have long existed in the same country, being multiplied in homogeneous populations, or at least in populations where the race of men has been com- paratively unafiected by foreign admixtures. Some diversity, therefore, is not utterly incompatible with unity of origin ; and thus we are admonished to carry our analysis still deeper, in the hope of separating what is merely special in the mind of man or accidental in the phases of society, from broader and more fundamental characteristics. To the latter class we shall most reasonably assign whatever has been held in common by the various families of nations, be their state of culture JfK CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race. \\ .41 what it may; tliose great specific properties of mankinaj the aspirations, faculties, and sentiments, which have in every period been distinguishing the human from the brute creation. Men are like each other, and unlike the rest of animated nature, not only as endowed with similar feelings and affections, or impelled by similar appetencies and aversions, but as speak- ing, reasoning, and reflecting creatures. Wheresoever man is, there we find these marks of his superior dignity. No depths of barbarism have yet been able to obliterate them, however much their brilliance may at times be clouded, or their sphere of action circumscribed. Or look at man as a progressive being, when he differs toto ccelo from the lower animals. The progress has indeed been slow in certain cases where the soil was un- congenial, or the civilising agents inefficient ; but experience teaches us that some advance is uniformly possible; that in the breasts of all men there are latent and mysterious faculties; that all are capable of passing gradually into the higher stages of existence, and readily adapting themselves to novel circum- stances and conditions. If we grant that in so far as our domestic instincts are concerned, a parallel is found among the other orders of creation, it is no less obvious, that wherever such exist in man, their character is uniform, their operation is identical : while in that loftier province of his being, where he is immediately connected with the ^God of the spirits of all flesh,' the traces of a common nature are peculiarly discei-nible. It is a fact that all varieties of men exhibit the same kind of spiritual perceptions, much as these may vary both in sensi- bility and clearness : all are actuated by sentiments of awe and deference to superior genii, blunted though these be, alike in savage and in civilised communities : all are able to appreciate high and noble deeds, and are susceptible of generous impulses : while all are gifted with the faculty of rising out of their subjection to the influence of the senses, and believe in some hereafter. Even where the human type is lowest, where it reaches the extreme of degradation, bordering almost on brutality, as, for example, in the natives of Australia^ the philanthropist is, notwithstanding, cheered by frequent glimpses of the same distinctive nature, and enabled to detect at least the groundwork of a desecrated temple. And if this general correspondency of mind and heart is tending to establish that all members of the human species constitute but one great family, much more is such connexion vindicated by presentiments which all of them alike evince in favour of the Christian faith. Wherever it has penetrated, the 42 Christ and other Masters. [part i. Good Shepherd's voice is heard, and wakes an echo in the consciences of men ; and what in every case attracts them to His fold, is also that which makes them truly conscious of the universal brotherhood subsisting in all nations. With the sole exception of Muhammadanism, — a heresy that drew its dogmas and its very life-blood from Revealed Eeligion, — we shall find that all the systems of the ancient world were limited in their design and local in their range. They were the images of separate nationalities; they issued from within; they repre- sented special modes of thought and harmonised with states of feeling and imagination that prevailed in certain districts : but with Christianity the case was altogether different. It came fresh from God: it rested on a series of objective revelations: it was active and diffusive as the light, and all-embracing as the firmament of heaven : it dealt with man as man, and never faltered in its claim to be regarded as a veritable Svorld- religion.' Obstacles it doubtless met with in appealing to the various tribes and nations whom it struggled to convert; yet few if any of these obstacles can fairly be ascribed to idiosyncrasies arising from diversity of race. The Hebrews, among whom the Gospel was indigenous, became ere long its most implacable opponents; and at present, when it is accepted by the bulk of the Germanic nations, other members of the Indo-European family have manifested no peculiar warmth in their appreciation of its ofier. It knows, in truth, of no distinctions in the pedigree of human souls, because it is the one religion, the religion of mankind. Accordingly it reaps in every soil a harvest of conversions. Heralds of the doctrine of the cross had scarcely issued from their lowly birthplace in Judaea, when they found a welcome in the neighbouring states, and even in the capitals of pagan Greece and Rome. They taught both intellectual and imperial masters of the age to bow before the simple majesty of evangelic truth. They civilised the rude but manly nations of the north. They penetrated far into the plains of Central Asia. They discoursed as freely and effect- ively in tents of wandering tribes, as in the schools and temples of the land of Egypt. And though century after century expired, the Gospel shewed no symptom of decay or imbecility; it was adapted, as at first, to the necessities of every climate, to the temperament of every ^race,' and all the varied phases of society. Nor at the present day are we without examples of this universal fitness. The families of Western Africa, including CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race. 48 that which some have deemed a separate and originally lower type of man, are daily proved to be convertible, are folded in the Christian Church, and are invested with the Christian character. The warlike tribe of the Zulus in Southern Africa, the crouching Dyaks on the coasts of Borneo, multitudes of South-sea islanders, who form together an assemblage of the greatest physical variations, are all yielding to the same appeals ; while in New Zealand, where but thirty years ago the natives were ferocious cannibals, the scourge of neighbouring islands, and the terror of the British seaman who was driven to their shores, we now behold a population almost as generally Christian as our own. The chiefs and people vie together in their zeal for the advancement of religion, and exhibit all that catalogue of virtues which distinguish the regenerate nature, 'love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meek- ness, temperance.' But in urging facts like these to prove the radiation of the human family from one common j^oint, we meet with some objections: (1) It is said, for instance, that identity of disposition may exist without implying an identity of origin^ Thus in the large group of cats, including the leopard, tiger, lion, and other species, the same general temperament and habits are every- where observable, and yet it is alleged such animals were originally made to constitute distinct varieties. To this it is sulHcient to reply, that man, as we may gather from the faculties of speech and reason, from his moral susceptibilities, his spiritual nature, and his vast capacity of progress, must be treated as a being sui generis; or, at least, that where differences like these exist we are not justified in reasoning so completely to his case from that of the inferior animals. It is not of course denied that with regard to what are called the animal appetencies and aversions of his nature, and even to one class of sensuous habits, such analogy may be adduced with justice, and pursued into its consequences. But in doing this, we must not overlook the fact that all varieties of men are far more intimately related than the class of animals in question. The various species of the feline genus either intermingle very seldom, or evince a strong repugnance to such union. If hybrids be occasionally produced, and if they threaten by their pro- pagation to commence an intermediate or degenerate race of animals, the wayward tendency is soon arrested by their absolute ^ This argument is also urged by Professor Agassiz, as above, p. ii8. 44 Christ and oilier Masters. [part i. sterility ; and tlius tlie species do not lose their original characteristics. On the other hand, such intermixtures are both possible and permanent among the different families of man. The ^ races ' which are thought to be peculiarly distinct from each other (the ^ Caucasian ' and the negro), are most ordinary examples of this law ; alliances between them issuing in a fruitful progeny, and, what is specially worthy of remark, the nobler type ere long predominating and absorbing the degraded ^ (2) It has also been contended that even were we at liberty to assume that the genus homo has only one species, i. e. to assume that no specific variety exists among the different tribes of man, this fact would never justify us in determining the derivation of all mankind from one single pair; for * similar causes,' it is urged, ' operating on two or more points of the globe under similar circumstances would necessarily produce similar results^.' But surely it is far more philosophical to prefer the simpler of two hypotheses, w^here it will adequately explain the various phenomena of any given question ; in other w^ords, it is unworthy of a thoughtful mind to advocate the notion of ' similar causes ' and ' similar circumstances,' when the facts before us do not call for such plurality. The spread of population and the present variations in the human species can be perfectly interpreted without this multiplying of pro- ductive centres. ^ ]!^othing short of necessity,' to quote a modern writer^, whom we shall not readily convict of super- stitious deference to the letter of the Old Testament, ^ should induce us to seek for an autochthony in different parts of the globe, which v/ould break the ties of blood-relationship that bind all men together ; and so far are we from being able to point out any necessity in this case, that all the attainable evidence clearly points in the opposite direction.' 3. The Physiological Proof, The axiom I have just advanced respecting the preference always due to simple hypotheses, will equally apply to this ^ Chev. Bunsen, Phil, of Uni- pediments are removed.' versal History, ii. io8, where the '-^ This argument, which has be- writer adds : * ISlature always tends come very current, is so stated in towards perfection, and the image Mr. BlackwelPs edition of Mallet's of God, hidden under deviations Northern Antiquities, p. 25. from the perfect type, returns, jure ^ Dr. Donaldson, New CratyluSy ^ostlimi7iii, as soon as outward im- 2nd ed. p. 100. CHAP, il] Unity of the 'human Race. 45 division of the argument The chief authorities for conducting it are Blumenbach and Prichard, whose laborious researches into tho physical history of man will ever be esteemed ^ among the richest contributions to the study of our present subject. They have shewn that animals acknowledged to form one species will, under the adventitious influences of domestication, climate, and the like, divide into a number of subordinate varieties; and thus establish a presumption that at least in respect of all the functions of his animal oeconomy, man will undergo a similar modification. They have shewn that dis« tinctions in the families of men are not so strongly marked, so uniform or permanent as exist in any given tribe of animals. They have shewn that all diversities insensibly pass into each other by graduated shades of difference, and, what is still more remarkable, that hardly any specimen can be adduced in which the actual transition is not capable of historical proof. Ex- amples have been multiplied to shew that with regard to human skeletons and crania in particular, the conformation is substan- tially the same in all types of man ; while deviations from the nobler types all range themselves within comparatively narrow limits, and present so many intermediate forms as to render the transition very gradual from one case to another. Similar results have flowed from investigations into the varieties of human colour and the texture of the human hair, which had been formerly regarded as the most abiding characteristics of a race, and are at present vaunted by the friends of slavery and the adversaries of Kevealed Religion. Colour is now proved to vary in a great degree with the peculiarities of climate ; while ^ woolly' hair is only one extreme gradation in a large scale of varieties, and is no longer to be treated as the necessary concomitant of a black skin and negro features^. These statements, however, have not been suffered to pass on without a challenge. Prichard's work is far from popular in some districts of America ; and two zealous writers^ bent as ^ See, for instance, Dr. Wise- depth and candour:' as above, 1.48. man's Lectures on the Connexion Some additional facts have been between Science and Revealed Re- more recently collected in Smyth's ligion, Lect. iii, iv. Lond. 1836, Vnity of the Human Races, New and Carpenter's Principles of Hu- York, 1 850. man Physiology, pp. 55 sq. Lond. ^ Cosmos, i. 352. 1846. 'Up to the present mo- ^ Both these gentlemen have ment,' adds the Chevalier Bunsen, long distinguished themselves by in speaking also of Prichard's great the emphasis with which they speak work, 'there exists no book which and write on this subject (see treats that question with equal Smyth, p. no), but their chief 46 Christ and other Masters. [part i. it would seem on proving at all hazards that the negro type of man is radically distinct from others, have been labouring hard for years to undermine the truth of man's original unity by various artifices. While the great majority of thoughtful Germans are at length persuaded that ' the unity of the human Si)ecies is a fact established as firmly as the unity of any other animal speciesV that conclusion is repudiated in the strongest terms by Messrs. Nott and Gliddon. (1) One of their objections which they urge in common with Agassiz is, that the analogy between the human and other animated species, requires us to assign to the varieties of men as well as to the different animals an origin according with their present geographical distribution. But to this it may be answered, that even if we should allow that different species of animals were all created each within some zoological district of its own — a point which those who make the statement cannot prove^ — it would by no means follow of necessity that men were also first of all located in the regions which they now inhabit. This argument again is guilty of neglecting all the higher properties of man : it deals with him as nothing more than a variety of animal life. Besides, the facts of history are themselves irreconcilable with the supposed analogy. The tribes of men are found to emigrate, and, after some few generations, flourish equally in very difierent climates. For example, the aborigines of the Ameri- can continent itself, comprising tribes of very different grades of civilisation, from the Esquimaux of the polar regions to the Aztecs of Mexico, are now acknowledged, even by the opponents of our theory, to be strictly homogeneous, i.e. scions of one parent stock. Of course, it is conceivable that adaptations do exist and have existed always in the human organisation, fitting this or that variety of man for some peculiar province. It is work has not been long before the cent * facts ' supplied as they main- public. Its title is: ^Ethnological tain by geology and palaeontology. Researches, based upon the Ancient especially the discovery of human Monuments, Painting, Sculptures, fossils in the peninsula of Florida, and Crania of Kaces, and upon These they urge are fatal to re- their Natural, Geographical, Phi- ceived ideas respecting the date losophical, and Biblical History, of man's creation. But neither of &c....by J. G. Nott, M.D., and the latter topics falls within the George E. Gliddon, &c. Philadel- scope of the present chapter. See phia, 1854.' A large portion of it an examination of the authors' is devoted to attacks on what is statements in the ^rziis/iQitar^^rZ?/, called the Mosaic chronology. The No. xliii. pp. i sq. authors aiso dwell upon some re- ^ In Bunsen, as above, i. 352. CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Piace. 47 also possible that like beneficent arrangements were already in process of formation and development anterior to the date of the earliest emigrations. Such marks of fitness every true philosopher is always ready to examine and appreciate ; but he nevertheless demurs to the assumption that the human species had no power of self-accommodation to diversities of climate, and no buoyancy enabling men to rise almost indefinitely beyond the limits of their primitive condition. (2) It is alleged against one of Prichard's main positions, that the principal types of the human species have not been varia,ble, but that, on the contrary, as far as records will enable us to go, the broader characteristics of man's physical organisa- tion have been absolutely fixed and inelastic. A favourite illustration of this argument is borrowed from Egyptian excavations, where monuments are said to prove that in the very earliest dawn of history the great distinctions that exist between the negro and the white man are quite as strongly marked as at the present day\ Unfortunately, so long as the enigmas of Egyptian chronology remain unsolved, we have no hope of ascertaining the precise dates of the inscriptions here referred to. Some are placed as early as the older Pharaohs, and one is cited as belonging to a most remote antiquity^. If we are justified in drawing any inference from these remains^, ^ See Morton's Crania Egypt- old Egyptians. One was fxeXav- iaca, p. 66; Smyth, Unity of the XP^^, another /AeXi'x/^ws. In Smith's Human Races, p. 40. Diet, of Gr. and Bom. Geogr., art. 2 The authority for this state- ^Egyptus (p. 38), it is contended ment is a communication made to that, notwithstanding the dark hue Mr. Gliddon by Lepsius, in whose of the Egyptians, they *were not opinion negroes are mentioned at a negro race, — a supposition con- Sakkara by the name of Kesh, on tradicted alike by osteology, and monuments of the sixth dynasty, by monumental paintings, where B.C. 3000: see Hamilton, The Pen- negroes often appear, but always tateuch and its Assailants, ip. I'j']^ either as tributaries or captives and 'postscript,' p. 338: Edinb. The Egyptians may be said to be 1852. intermediate between the Syro- ^ Hamilton, as above, p. 315, Arabian and Ethiopic type; and note ; cf . Prichard, 11. 346 sq. ; as at this day the Copt is at once Wiseman, i. 153 sq. See Pri- recognised in Syria by his dark hue, chard, III. 227 sq. : from the evi- the duskier complexion — brown, dence cited it must be concluded with a tinge of red — of the ancient that ' the subjects of the Pharaohs Egyptians may be ascribed solely had something in their physical to their climate, and to those mo- character approximating to that difying causes which, in the course of the negro' (p. 230). Still con- of generations, affect both the os- siderable diversity existed, as to teology and the physiology of long- figure and complexion, among the settled races.' 'Im Grossen und 48 Christ and other Masters. [part I. it is in favour of the clear distinctness of the negro and the old Egyptian families at a very early period. Yet no evidence whatever is furnished by this fact against the doctrine of their common origin. How soon the various types of man had been developed, whether variations did not actually exist to some degree among the sons of Noah\ is a question wrapt, and likely to continue wrapt, in utter mystery. Science freely grants that she has no ability to solve it^; and the Christian therefore may repose in his belief that men are really one species, till the scriptural narrative has been discredited by arguments more cogent and conclusive than the advocates of slavery have as yet extracted from Egyptian hieroglyphics. 4. The Philological Proof. By following out his principles of classification, Blumenbach concluded that the human species is divisible into three primary and two secondary varieties (Ca,ucasian, Mongolian, American, Ethiopian, and Malay). Prichard distributed them afresh into seven classes (Iranian, Turanian, American, Hottentots, Ne- groes, Papuas, and Alfourous) ; while others have since raised the number as high as eleven, conceiving that there is no middle ground between this classification and the reduction of them all to one. But as the question was more fully canvassed, thoughtful writers found it quite impossible, even from a physiological point of view, * to recognise in the groups thus formed any true typical distinction, any general and consistent Ganzen,' says Knobel (pp. 277, -278), probable that any original difference 'gehorten die Aegypter zur dunkel- of type in the family of Noah would farbigen Abtheilung der Erdbevolk- be very rapidly developed : for, as erung. ' Yet he continues, ' Diese An- Dr. Carpenter observes {Principles gaben machen jedoch die Aegypter of Human Physiology ^ p. 53, Lond. noch nicht zu rabenschwarzen 1846), 'there would be a greater und wollhaarigen Negern.' tendency to the perpetuation of ^ This supposition may perhaps these varieties, in other words, to receive encouragement from the the origination of distinct races, fact that two at least of the sons during the earlier ages of the history of Noah bear names expressing a of the race, than at the present distinctive colour. Thus Ham, oi time, when in fact, by the increasing which the root is found alike in admixture of races which have long the Semitic (QDn) ^^d the Coptic been isolated, there is a tendency (chame), signifies 'hot,' 'sunburnt,' to the fusion of all these varieties, * black,' Jajphet (HS^ from HDJ) in and to a return to a common type.' like manner signifies 'beauty/ re- ^ See the language of the great ferring more especially to fairness anatomist, Johannes Miiller, m of complexion: cf. Knobel, Die Humboldt's (7osmo.s-,i. 352, 353; and Volkertafel der Genesis, Giessen, cf. Mr. Parker's admission, above, 1850, pp. -239, 22, 13. It is further P- 3^) ^- ^' CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race. 49 natural principled' They all were felt to be conventional, vague, and artificial ; tending thus in no small measure to enforce the supposition that all human forms were only modi- fications of a single species. And the same results are flowing from the generalisations of philology. The two inquiries should indeed be kept as independent as possible, because we are not warranted in affirming that the classification of language will ever strictly coincide with the classification of physiology. The variations in the structure of the human frame may not have taken place concurrently with the confusion and disruption of human language ; and, therefore, we are unable to predict that all who carried with them kindred elements of speech would be distinguished by the same varieties of physical organisation. Still the labours of philology, by disentangling the perplexities in which the subject is involved, all point us to a few grand sources, out of which the various languages of man may have originally welled. According to Bopp's arrangement^, which he based on purely philological considerations, the division ought to be tripartite : (1) Languages with monosyllabic roots, but inca- pable of composition, and therefore without grammar or organisation ; (2) Languages with monosyllabic roots which are susceptible of composition, and in which the grammar and organisation depend entirely on this; (3) Languages which consist of dissyllabic verbal roots, and require three consonants in the vehicles of their fundamental signification. The second and third of these classes are known to scholars as the Aryan, or Indo-European, and the Aramaic, or Semitic. From the circumstance that persons speaking these languages have always occupied a high position in the history of mankind, our know- ledge of them is considerable, and nearly all their properties are fully analysed in works of modern scholars. Such, however, cannot be affirmed of members of the group which Bopp arranges first in his classification. That group is meant to comprehend all other languages of man, — those, namely, in Europe, Asia, and Africa, which are not included in the second and third groups, together with the various abo- riginal dialects of America. As a first approximation to more systematic treatment, Mr. Max Miiller^ has proposed to form a ^ CosmoSf I. 353. specting the Non-Irdinian andNon- 2 See Comparative Grammar^ i. Semitic Languages of Asia or Eu- 102, 103; Lond. 1856. rope,' in Bunsen, as above, i. 263 •^ See his able report on the — 486. *Last results of the Besearches re- H. 4 50 Christ and other Masters. [part I* separate class, which he entitles the Turanian, making it to comprehend all European, Asiatic, and Polynesian languages, that do not harmonise either with the Aryan or Semitic type. Of this Turanian group the principal branches are Tungusic, Mongolic, Turkic, and Finnic in the north, Taic, Malai'c, Bho- tiya, and Tamilic in the south; it being confessed, however, that they cannot offer such distinctive traits of family-likeness, as we find among the members of the other groups. They are rather like so many ^ radii diverging from a common centre,' than 'children of a common parent^' But supposing such affinities to be established, supposing that we are not under the necessity of admitting different independent beginnings in structure and lexicography for the elements of the Turanian, as we certainly are not for those of the Semitic and Aryan branches, what is to be said of the sporadic languages in Africa and America, which have not hitherto been definitely placed in any of these groups ? Are they spontaneous products of the several regions where they flourish ? or are they really connected with the languages of Europe and Asia, though the links of union be now losf? The latter supposition is not only more probable on ethnological and traditional grounds, but has received distinct corroboration from researches of the present day^ The native languages of North- America, it is stated, are not only uniform in their grammatical type, as had been long acknowledged, but exhibit many clear analogies to the Turanian forms of Northern Asia; thus according with a supposition, which is rendered probable on other grounds, that the elements of American population were all transported from that quarter. Many interesting results have also been obtained from recent investigations into the languages of Africa^, the general tendency of which suggests 1 Mr. Max Muller's *Last Re- in this work), enable me to say, suits of the Researches, &c.,' as that the Asiatic origin of all these before, i. 478. tribes is as fully proved as the ^ The Government of the United unity of family among themselves : ' States are now printing, under the as before, 11. 112. editorship of Mr. Schoolcraft, a ^ Bunsen, 11. 115 sq. The same series of volumes containing His- writer draws attention (p. 114) to torical and Statistical Information the fact established by William respecting the History, Condition, von Humboldt that most of the and Prospects of the Indian Tribes. Polynesian languages are connected According to the report of the Che- with the Malay, i. e. are capable of valier Bunsen *the Hnguistic data being classed with the Turanian before us, combined with the tra- group. But whether the remark ditions and customs, and particu- can be extended to the Papua lan- larly with the system of pictorial guages spoken in Australia, New or mnemonic writing (first revealed Guinea, &c., is not yet ascertained. CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race, 51 the grouping of them with Semitic and Turanian idioms, and connects the spread of population over that continent, partly with the northern states that border on Abyssinia, and partly with the southern tribes in which the Kafir dialects prevail. The arduous question now remaining for philologers is this • to ascertain if, when the individual languages have been ar- ranged in groups, the groups themselves be also capable of reduction under one primordial group ; or rather to establish, if not the absolute confluence of all languages to one common source, at least the possibility of their original divergence from one common center. Those of which we are best able to affirm the nature and affinities all indicate the table-land of Upper Asia^ as the birthplace of the civilisation they were instru- mental in communicating to other districts. Starting therefore from this point we may perhaps divine the general course of man's migrations into Europe and Asia, and the nature of the process by which tribes were gradually separated from each other in the various provinces of the earth. The earliest emigrants may have proceeded eastward into China, since the language of that country is least of all organic in its structure and the least developed of Turanian tongues. But as like impulses were constantly at work, new colonies would be con- tinually projected till a layer of population had been actually expanded over many parts of Europe and Asia^. It is also 1 I would here draw attention work Die Volkertafel der Genesis, to the confidence with which Sir cited above, for although he favours William Jones pronounces on this what is called the document-hy- Fubject. After expressing his be- pothesis, professing to ascribe the lief in the more than human origin loth chapter of Genesis to the of the Mosaic narrative, he adds: older (or 'Elohistic') hand, he is *It is no longer probable only, but no less persuaded of its vast im- it is absolutely certain, that the portance in all questions of ethno- whole race of man proceeded from graphy. 'Die Stammvater' (he Iran, as from a centre, whence they writes, p. 9) ' sind mythische Per- migrated at first in three great sonen, wahrend die von ihnen colonies; and that those three abgeleiteten Volker geschichtlich branches grew from a common sind.' stock which had been miraculously '^ Eawlinson, Early Hist, of Ba* preserved in a general convulsion by Ionia (Journal of the Koyal As. andinundation of this globe:' WorkSj Soc. xv. 232), has recently made I. 137, Lond. 1799. Cf. A. Fr, the following suggestions with re- Gfrorer, Urgeschichte des mensch- spect to the course of the Scythic lichen Geschlechts, Schaffhausen, (Hamitio or Turanian) races: — 1 855> ^*ho also recognises the truth- * Leaving it, therefore, still a matter fulness of the Hebrew narrative of speculation whether the pre- respecting the dispersion of the historic period may be m,ore cor- human family. The same may rectly estimated at two thousand be afiirmed of Knobel's learned or four thousand years ; I will only 4—2 o2 Christ and other AI asters. [i»art t. easy to conjecture how tlie isolation of each tribe, and other disuniting agencies, promoted the rapid growth of different dialects, and how the progress of confusion would be expedited by the introduction of secondary formations, tending to obscure the old affinities and hide the verbal roots which all may have imported from the mother-country. But many of the early settlers appear to have been subsequently overflowed, pushed forward, or exterminated by fresh waves of population, issuing from the districts where the Aryan and Semitic idioms had been planted ; since the former of these grew predominant in the north of India, and in nearly all the European continent, while the latter flourished far and wide in western Asia, and diffused itself, as some conjecture, under certain modifications, into Egypt and the north of Africa. Such, I say, was probably the course and order of these primitive migrations ; yet, even had we evidence to justify us in pronouncing definitely on the subject, it would never by itself explain the vast varieties of human speech. Three families of man, or rather three original groups, in which the several members of each group possessed the means of ijitercommunication in the same mother-tongue, may have been either simultaneously, or in succession, parted from each other, and propelled across the continents and islands of the globe ; but how these groups themselves originated is a more recondite question. In truth, as physiology, though it establish the identity of the human species, can of itself deter- mine nothing as to the precise condition and the actual birth- 2^1 ace of the aborigines, so are the oracles of philology all silent touching what occurred before the founding of the primitive types of human speech. The question, therefore, in so far as these two sciences extend, is left enveloped in uncertainty. remark, that it must have been ritania, Sicily, and Iberia; from during this interval that nation- the other, to the southern coasts alities were first estabhshed ; and of Greece and Italy. They further, that the aboriginal Scyths or Ham- probably, occupied the whole area ites appear to have been the prin- of modern Persia, and thence pro- cipal movers in the great work of ceeding to the north by Chalcis and social organisation. They would the Caucasus, they penetrated to seem, indeed, simultaneously or the extreme northern point of the progressively to have passed in one European and Asiatic continents.* direction by southern Persia into He adds that 'independently of all India; in another, through south- reference to the Scriptural record, ern Arabia to Ethiopia, Egj^pt, and we should still be able to fix on the Nmnidia. They must have spread plains of Shinar, as the focus from themselves at the same time over which the various lines had ra- Syria and Asia Minor, sending out diated.' colonies from one coimtry to Mau- CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race, 53 Among our English scholars, for example, there are many, who although persuaded that the principles Avhich led to the forma- tion of Indo-European and Semitic families are incontrovertible, despair of bridging over the great gulf that lies between them, so as to establish their correspondence either in organisation, in grammatical structure, or in vocabulary; and when it is further urged that both these families may be scientifically connected with the more sporadic forms of language which we call 'Tura- nian,' such philologers declaim against the gross injustice of the torture, and deny that the generic unity of man is demonstrable by this process. Others, on the contrary, are no less confident that the identification will be ultimately established. As the science of philology advances, they predict that more and more traces of family-likeness will be generally recognised; that radicals, which, under various changes and disguises, have survived in all these different groups of language ever since the first migrations, will be more and more readily detected ; and that, while it is most unphilosophical to derive any one of these groups from the other, they will all at last be proved to have been emanations from some great primordial tongue, the leading elements of which were either broken in the lapse of time, or buried in some vast catastrophe. Now, whatever be the issue of those learned labours, and whatever be the fate of these dissuasives on the one hand, or these confident predictions on the other, they give rise to a reflection of the utmost value to all Christians. The veracity of Holy Scripture, far from being weakened by them, is con- siderably enhanced. The book of Genesis aflford-cd by anticipa- tion the best medium for explaining such linguistic phenomena. It tells us that there was in early times a great divulsion in the elements of human language, that whereas the whole earth was formerly 'of one lip' (Gen. xi. 1), the unity of speech was broken on the plain of Shinar, and the human family dispersed from thence 'upon the face of all the earth.' And as the sacred narrative does not specify the nature nor degree of this ' confusion,' it is equally reconcil cable with either of the current theories of philology : it will hold its ground unshaken, whether we are led eventually to the hypothesis that the primitive language is entirely lost, or whether portions of the tangled threads survive in various languages, thus serving to connect us with the earliest fathers of mankind. What then is the general inference to be gathered from this chapter in elucidation of our main inquiry 1 We may sum it 54 Chmst and other Masters. [part i. up as follows : — Man is a religious being. The ideas of God, of sacrifice, of prayer, have been inwoven with his spiritual constitution, and have, therefore, always struggled for expres- sion in his personal and social life. Approach him where you will, in England, in the tropics, or at the antipodes, and he exhibits this unfailing proof of his humanity, especially in all the sober moments, when he communes most profoundly with himself, in trouble, sorrow and perplexity, in solitude, in sick- ness, or when verging close upon the grave. Exactly, therefore, in proportion as we have established the unity of his origin, we have established also a presumption that the various families of man inherited from age to age a stock of sacred knowledge, and conveyed it with them in their wanderings from the cradle of the human race. But it is obvious that in beings ever liable to fall, and ever prone to substitute their speculations for the holy will of God, this great substratum of religion might in course of time be overgrown and buried ; just as primitive forms of speech would disappear beneath a crop of secondary formations. The effect of individual character, of isolation, of climate, the phenomena of nature, and a host of adventitious agencies, would soon be visible in the altered aspects of traditions ; while a correspond- ing modification of the forms of social life would gradually affect the tone and sensibility of the human spirit. Where the tribe, or people, sank in moral culture, the idea of God would also be enfeebled and debased^ The worshipper whose heart was shrinking from the presence of the High and Holy One, would speedily betake himself to more congenial objects. He would look no higher than the earth, and finding, as he grew more selfish and irreverent, that some powers of nature with which he stood connected were antagonistic to him, and opposed the gratification of his wishes, he would chiefly strive to over- come them, or would struggle to disarm theii* vengeance, by re- ^ The following confession of 'hoch?,ieny^e^Qn^ausgegangensind; A. W. von Schlegel is the more dass die magische Gewalt der Natur remarkable, because its author was iiber die Einbildungskraft des da- entirely influenced by the force of maligen Menschengeschlechts erst historical truth, and not by theo- spater die Vielgotterei hervorrief, logical prepossessions. Here at und endlich in dem Volksglauben length he was of one accord with die geistigen EeligionsbegrifEe ganz his distinguished brother. 'Jemehr verdunkelte, wahrend die Weisen ich in der alten Weltgeschichte allein im HeiUgthume das uralte forsche, um so mehr iiberzeuge ich Geheimniss bewahrten.' Vorrede mich, dass die gesitteten Volker to the German translation of Pri- Yon einer reinern Verehrung des ch&id^s Egyptian Mythology, "p.xyi. CHAP. II.] Unity of the human Race, 53 sorting to a multitude of exorcisms and other like devices. All his worship would eventually be nature-worship ; all his prayers would take the abject form of deprecation. Or in different regions, where external nature was more joyous and propitious, and where man himself, by the development of his reflective and imaginative faculties, had gained a higher measure of intelligence ; the creed of paganism would also be considerably idealised, it would become more sentimental and poetic. Ite mythes would be far loftier in conception, and would all be cast in gentler moulds. The pagan worshipper might still, indeed, address his homage to the good or evil energies of nature, but no longer to a formless power or an impersonal divineness : he would fashion for himself a group of new divinities, to whom he could attribute human shapes and human properties ; and thus the highest effort of this class of heathen was to bring about the deification of humanity. But as in every case the drapery of imagination with which they clothed their gods was the spontaneous product of their own locality, the cycle of religious mythes would be indefinitely enlarged. Each town and village would give birth to fresh divinities, until at length it grew almost impossible in any part of heathendom to recognise the purer doctrine of the earliest ages, to distinguish even broken echoes of the first traditions, or to disentangle the few elements of primitive truth from an interminable mass of aftergrowths, which had corrupted and concealed it. So hopeless seemed the task of restoration, so remote from men's perceptions the idea of one all-ruling, all- embracing God, that, in the fourth century of the present era, when Julian and his pagan followers laboured to disparage Christianity, on the ground that it was far too modern and ex- clusive, they were driven to avow that a plurality of religions is inevitable, nay, is actually demanded by the diverse forms of human thought, and by the multiplicity of * human races^' And the same convictions still prevail, as we have seen, in England and elsewhere among the heralds of the Absolute Religion. Yet, in spite of every wayward tendency of human nature, ^ Cf. Neander, Ch. Hist, iii. 135 \d^ac ovre a\Xw$ ttju yyjv v(f) hbs sq. After some general remarks i/jLTrXTjffdiipai irda-av .... Uavraxov on the question of man's origin, 5^ ddpdws, vevffdvrwv dewf, ovirep Julian himself proceeds as follows : rpbirov 6 eZs, ovru d^ Kal ol irXeiovs *FjVTavda dk apK^crei toctovtov eirreiv^ TrporfkBov avOpwiroiy rots yepedp- (is i^ €pbs fxkv Kal jULids ovctlv, oore X^'^ dcois dtroKXrjpbjd^VTcs, Toifs vbjxovs eUbs iirl roaovrov irapiik- Ojpp, ed, Spanheim, i, 292. 56 Christ and other Masters. [part i. disuniting men from God, and substituting for the steadier light of old traditions, the capricious glimmerings of their own imagi- nation ; there was ever on the earth one ark of refuge, and one beacon planted on a hill. The Church of God, the keeper and the witness of the true religion, rested on a sure and stable basis, so that while the heathen were abandoned to themselves to test the systems of their own devising, and were ^ given over to a reprobate mind ;' its inmates had continual access to the oracles of God, — the children of Israel had light in their dwell- ings. There, in what is verily the moral center of the worlds midway between the principal seats of ancient civilisation, God exemplified upon a single people^ the restoring and exalting process, under which humanity at large, when ready for the great experiment, should be cured of all its guilty wanderings and infatuations, and made one again in Christ. ^ a. Theodioretf De Providentiaf rd edvt], rd ttjv avrrjv ^x^^"*"^ Orat. X.: Opj^. iv. 454, Paris, 1642 : (pvcnp, els ttju ttjs eva-e^eias Koivwviav OuTOJ St' hos edvovs tov 'laparjX iravTU €/cdX?t. CHAPTER HI. On the Characteristics of Religion under the Old Testament Ov^k ydp did ^lovdaiovs [ibvovs 6 vofxos tjv, ovbk dc avrovs fidvovs ol TrpocprJTai cirefXTTOPTO, dXkd vpos 'lovdaiovs jxev eTri/JLirovTo, /cat irapd 'lovdaiwv idicoKovro' irdaris de rrjs oIkov/jl€V7)$ T}(rav StdaffKaXiov lepov ryjs irepl Qeov yvucrecoSi Kal rijs /card ypvxv^ TroXtretas. S. Athanasius, contra Gentes, cap. xii. (p. 57, ed. Benedict.). The non-finality of Hehraism. Progressive character of the old ceconomy. Importance of just ideas respecting God. The Hebrew doctrine of God : its peculiar sublimity. How illustrated by the Exodus: and in the Book of Psalms. This doctrine essentially moral. Example drawn from Solomon's prayer. Contrast between the Hebrew and the Phmni- cian theology. Phoenician divinities. Hebrew doctrine of man. Cha- racter of sin. The malignity of sin especially asserted. Effects of this training. Objections to the ritual branches of the Law. Peculiar tem- perament and position of the Hebrews. Symbolic mode of teaching. Distinction between types and symbols. General principles inculcated by the sacrificial system. Example. Different classes of transgressions. Operation and effects of the Levitical offerings. Suggestive features of the sanctuary. Belation of the Law to the Gospel. The Protevan- gelium. The call of Abraham. Indefinite form of the early Promise, Objections to the received views of prophecy. Germinant accomplish- ments of prophecy . State of feeling on these subjects among the Jews. Admissions of modern sceptics. The scriptural account of prophecy : its reality and objectivity. Assailants of this view. Hebrew prophecy as based on history ^ and intertwined with it. Particular instances. Pro- phecy in the age of David. The Messiah was to be a King : of super- human dignity ; and also a Priest. Doctrine of a suffering Messiah. Prophecy in the age of the Captivity, The new Kingdom. The new Covenant, Having now in some measure cleared a way to our investiga- tion, first, by pointing out the special tendencies of modern disbelief, and secondly, by undermining one of tbe more plausible positions which its advocates have sought to occupy, I shall proceed to ascertain the leading traits by which Revealed Religion was distinguishable in all the earlier stages of its progress. For since Christianity professes to reach backward 58 . Christ and other Masters, [part t. into periods long anterior to the human lifetime of its Founder; since it claims to be most vitally connected with the Old- Testament ceconomy, and since the roots from which it sprang are there ; we see not only the importance, but necessity, of ana- lysing the ideas embodied in the Hebrew institutions, of reverting to the solemn ordinances of the Law, and studying the oracular voices of the Prophets. We shall thus be able to compare the aspects of religious thought and feeling as displayed in members of the sacred commonwealth with contemporary systems of the heathen world. If Hebraism resemble these in such a manner as to justify the inference that it was derived from any or from all of them, then Christianity, in turn, professing to have grown directly out of it, is ultimately resolvable into heathen elements. Or, if again the principles alike of Heathenism and Hebraism be nothing more than natural projections of religious instincts, mere expedients of the human understanding to escape from what is felt to be a burden and a paradox, then Christianity may also be subjective in its origin, — a fresh development of that which, having issued from the human breast in ruder times, was afterwards re- modelled in accordance with the riper judgments of humanity in the Augustan period. Now the two great principles of Hebraism, the poles, one might affirm, on which the system absolutely turned, were (1) the Law, and (2) the Promise ; that designed to keep alive the elementary idea of God, and superintend the education of the human spirit during the comparative infancy of the race ; while this was occupied in opening out a brighter and more blissful future, where the limits of the Church of God would be indefinitely widened, and the happiness of all its members inexpressibly enhanced. For that Hebraism was never meant to be an ultimate stage in the unfolding of the true religion, is apparent from confessions and arrangements of its own sacred books. They frequently proclaim its non-finality^ The prophets, keeping ^ If no other text existed, Jerem. institute: *When God, who is xxxi. 3 1 sq. as compared with Heb. highly to be extolled, gave the Law, viii. would be sufficient to establish He knew that this form of education this position. On the attempts of was sufficient for a certain period, Jewish writers to evade the force which His wisdom had fixed, that of it, see Schottgen's Horce He- it was sufficient to prepare those hraiccBf i. 969, Dresdae, 1733. Yet who received it, and inchne their one at least of the later Babbis minds to receive the second form, (Albo) distinctly recognises the although God has revealed this to temporary character of the Mosaic no man ; but when the time shall CHAP. III.] On the Characteristics of Religion, &c, 59 pace with the spiritual development of the nation, cany on men's thoughts beyond a merely ritual service, and lay gr^atsr stress on the obedience of the heart; and in the age of the Captivity, when the observance of the Law was made to some degree impossible, ^ a new covenant' is placed in actual contrat t with the old, and dignity assigned to it which is denied to the preceding. Yet the kernel of that ancient system, — the pro- found relations it exhibited between Jehovah and His people, the principles that underlay its sacrifices and that breathed through all its symbols, — was imperishable. The Law was not to sink without the prospect of some glorious sublimation ; it did not expire without transfusing its own life into the heart of a successor. Christianity is the legitimate offspring of the elder dispensation, because, according even fco De Wette, the Old Testament ^ is a great prophecy, a great type of Him who was to come and has come^ ; ' because the Law in all its breadth and depth is tributary to the Gospel, and because the Saviour came not to destroy, but to transfigure and complete. This thought, however, of substantial identity between the old and new ceconomies, has frequently been misconceived, or overstated, in the popular teaching of divines. Persuaded that the Church of God was not without her * Acts and Monuments before Christ incarnate V zealous above all things to maintain the unity and fixity of truth, and to announce those glorious principles that give coherence to the history of redemption, they have seemed to speak of the Old Testament as though it were an absolute and perfect revelation, and have therefore laboured to evolve from it the special doctrines of the GospeF. come, God will reveal that second period when there was a strong form to men : ' quoted in Tholuck, tendency to Judaize, and reduce On the Ep. to the Hebrews, i. 294. the Gospel into a kind of 'New ^ See Bahr, Symbolik des Mo- Law.' Thus we find a writer of saischen Cultus, i. 16, note, Held- the 12th centurj expressing him- elberg, 1837. *Das Christenthum,' self as follows: 'Primus gradus est writes Wuttke [Gesch. des Heiden- cognitionis fidei quo nihil minus thums, I. 18, Breslau, 1852), *im unquam fides habere potuit: credere weltgeschichtlichen Sinne beginnt videlicet Deum esse et eum Salva- nicht erst mit dem Auftreten Jesu torem et Kemuneratorem expectare. Christi, sondern Christus ist der Usee cognitio fidei simpHcibus ante Mittelpunkt des Ghn.8tenth.um.3,nnd incarnationem Verbi ad salutem mit ihm bricht die schon lange vor- sufficere potuit, videlicet ut et Beimi handene Knospe zur vollen Bliithe crederent et Salvatorem expec- auf .' tarent : quamvis ej usdem salvationis 2 The title of Bp. Montague's suae modum et tempus non cog- work, published in 1642. noscerent. Duo enim in homine ^ The true distinction was, how- tantum sunt, natura et culpa : et ever, clearly seen even during the Creator ad naturam refertur, Sa.1- 60 Christ and other Masters, [part I. They consult it with the eyes of Christians rather than of He- brews, and neglecting to shade off the full illumination which our Lord and the apostles turned upon it, feel themselves at liberty to urge that what is now made clear to us, must have been also luminous from the beginning. And a like forgetfulness to vary the point of view from which we contemplate the records of the Elder Church, has often issued in a disregard of those great laws of sequence and progression that characterise its general history. God, who in the Son spake once and absolutely, had communi- cated only parcels of the truth" (TroXv/xepoj?), and these at various seasons, by the ministry of the prophets (Heb. i. 1). His communications then, as ever, were adapted to the exigencies of the age, and were proportioned to the receptivity of the people. For in the training of the sacred corporation, as in that of individuals under discipline, there was a gradual exercise and evolution of the spiritual powers of man, — a growth from the half-consciousness of childhood to the larger views, the deeper reasonings, the accumulated wisdom of maturity; and, therefore, it is easy to observe how, corresponding with this growth in the capacity of the subject, the illumination granted from on high had also passed through different stages in a measurable pro- gress. Clearer insight into some of the great mysteries of the Cross was only the reward of patient waiting, or the fruit of vator ad culpam. Sub lege autem creator credebatur, et ab eo salus scripta crevit cognitio, quando jam et redemptio expectabatur ; per de persona Redemptoris manifeste quern vero et quomodo eadem salus agi coepit, et Salvator per legem implenda et perficienda foret, ex- promitti, et post promissionem ceptis paucis quibus hoc scire sin- expectari. Sub gratia autem adhuc gulariter in munere datum erat, amplius excrevit cognitio, cum ipse a caeteris etiam fidelibus non cog* jam Salvator, non ut prius a multis noscebatur. Sub lege autem per- putabatur solum homo, sed et Deus sona Redemptoris mittenda prse- verus manifestatus est. Et ipse dicebatur, et ventura expectabatur. redemptionis modus non in terrenae Qu£e autem ipsa persona haec foret culmine potestatis, sed in morte homo an angelus, an Deus, nondum probatus est constare Salvatoris.' manifestabatur. Soli hoc cognove^ H. de S. Victore, Erudit. Theolog, runt, qui per Spiritum singulariter ex Miscellan. Lib. i. Tit. xviii. 0pp. ad hoc illuminati fuerunt. Sub III. 73. Mogunt. 161 7. gi-atia autem manifeste omnibus, The same writer (De 5'acrammifs, jam et praedicatur et creditur, et Lib. I. pars x. c. vi. ) discusses the modus redemptionis et qualitas question, * an secundum mutationes personas Redemptoris.' And simi- temporum mutata sit fides' {0pp. lar principles were inculcated on III. 412 sq.), and concludes in the the English nuns at the beginning following passage: — 'Crevit itaque of the next century: *Nime^ god per tempora fides in omnibus, ut ^eme, mine leoue sustren, uor hwi major esset, sed mutata non est, me ouh Him to luuien. Erest, ase ut aha esset. Ante legem, Deus a mon ]?et wowe^ — ase a King CHAP. III.] On the Characteristics of Religion, etc. 61 tedious and (as many deem) circuitous probation^ ; while of other truths that constitute the household words of Christianitj, the prophet and the saint alike were ignorant ; they were left to * inquire and search diligently' (1 Pet. i. 10), until the Peda- gogue was superseded by the heavenly Teacher^, and Hhe fulness of the times' had come. With this conviction clearly present to the mind, I now purpose to examine the character of the Law, and some of the peculiar functions it was destined to perform in the continuous training of the Hebrews; not of course excluding from our survey what is termed the patriarchal dispensation, since in all its leading characteristics (those of prayer and sacrifice, for instance) it is one with the Mosaic system. )?et luuede one lefdi of feorrene londe, and sende hire His soudes- men biforen, j^et weren J^e patri- arkes and )7e prophetes of )?e Olde Testament, mid lettres isealed. A last He com Him suluen, and brouhte ]?et gospel ase lettres io- pened, and wrot mid His owune blode saluz to His leofmon.' An- cren Biwle (ed. Camden Soc. 1853), p. 388. 1 The objection based upon the length of interval that elapsed be- tween the fall of man and his re- demption, is as old as Celsus and Porphyry. Leo the Great repels it in the following passage, radiant with the light of true philosophy : *Cessent igitur illorum querelae, qui impio murmur e divinis dispen- sationibus obloquentes, de Domi- nicae nativitatis tarditate causan- tur, tanquam praeteritis tempori- bus non sit impensum, quod in ultima mundi astate est gestum. Yerbi incarnatio hsec contulit fa- cienda (?), quae facta (?) et sacra- mentum salutis humanae in nulla unquam antiquitate cessavit. Quod praedicaverunt apostoli, hoc annun- ciaverunt prophetae; nee sero est impletum, quod semper est credi- turn. Sapientia vero et benignitas Dei hoc saliitiferi operis mora capa- ciores nos suce vocationis effecit; ut quod multis signis, multis vocibus, multisque mysteriis per tot fuerat secula prEenunciatum, in his diebus Evangelii non esset ambiguum ; et nativitas, quae omnia miracula, om- nemque intelligenti* erat excessura mensuram, tanto constantiorem in nobis gigneret fidem, quanto prae- dicatio ejus et antiquior praecessisset et crebrior. Non itaque novo con- silio Deus rebus humanis, nee sera miseratione consuluit; sed a con- stitutione unam eandemque om- nibus causam salutis instituit. Gratia autem Dei, qua semper est universitas justificata sanctorum, aucta est Christo nascente non coRpta.^ Sermo in. de Nativitate: Ojjp. p. 16, col. I, B, Paris, 1639. 2 Gal. iii. 24. This metaphor of St. Paul is most expressive, pointing out the true relation of the Law to the Gospel, and vin- dicating its claim to be regarded as an agent (though but elemen- tary and subordinate) in the moral education of the Church. St. Chrysostom [in loc.) expands the same idea with great clearness: — '0 de Traidayuyos ovk ivavriovrai T(^ 5i5acr/caX6j, dXXa koI (rufMirpdrTei^ Trd(T7)s KCLKias aTraXXarrwi' rbv viov^ Kal fxerd Trdarjs crxoXijs rd fxad^/JLara Trapd Tov didacTKdXov Se'xeo-^at irapa- (JKevd^oiV dXX* 6Tav h ?^et yevrjTatf d^>i,d, when the ark had come in triumph to the new metropolis and when the cycle of the Hebrew liturgy was celebrated in its fulness. Such a man would find that he was planted in the midst of a minute and solemn ritual, its centre in the holy tabernacle, or rather in the ark of the covenant, where God, who ^rideth upon the heaven of heavens* (Ps. Ixviii. 33), ha^ condescended to approach His fallen creatures, and dispense His gifts of grace. The tabernacle itself was curtained from the outer world, and subdivided into three compartments, each with its appro- priate office in the worship of Jehovah. The forecourt was a gathering-point for all the congregation of the Israelites : the holy place was destined for a special order ^, for the mem- ^ The distinction does not, how- dotal casfe among the Hebrews. The ever, prove the existence of a sacer- idea of caste is inseparably connect- 80 Christ and other Masters, [part I. bers of the sacerdotal family, whom God, in carrying out His purpose, had brought nigh unto Himself: while only one of these, and he upon a single day of the year, was authorized to pass beyond a veil suspended at the extremity of the holy place, that he might offer incense near the mercy-seat, or cover- ing of the ark of witness, and so minister in the holiest of all. But other circumstances urged the Hebrew layman in the same direction, and constrained him to reflect on the pro- visions of the Law. He was most deeply interested in the multifarious acts of worship ever celebrated in the mother-city of Judsea. Like his countrymen in general he was circumcised : he stood in a peculiar nearness, or in covenant-relations to the God of Abraham ; and in virtue of this connexion prayed to God as to his own God, and was able to participate in what is found to be an all-pervading element of Hebrew worship, the rite of sacrifice. He felt, moreover, that the system under which he lived was such as to accuse, convict, and punish him when he deflected from the course of action it prescribed. Of these delinquencies one section were the open violations of the Moral Law which contravened the letter of the Decalogue; the rest were all transgressions of inferior branches of the legal system, partly moral, partly positive or ceremonial. Now the former class embracing all varieties of heinous sin the worshipper knew would subject him to excommunication or else to death itself. The Law was able to prescribe no remedy for them : it claimed Hhe blood not of a vicarious victim, but of the transgressor \' He was, therefore, either separated, where the sin was public and notorious, from all intercourse with other Hebrews, and was driven to confess with shame and bitter self-reproaches, 'Thou desirest not sacrifice, else would I give it ;' or was sen- tenced to die 'without mercy,' an example of the just severity of God, a warning to his neighbours. Hope there might be ed with that of different origins words, that as contrasted with Gen- (e.^r. the Br^hmans, and they alone, tile nations, every Hebrew would are said to have issued from the know God in His revealed charac- head of Brdhma). Besides, it was ter and stand to Him in a relation- announced in early times to all the ship peculiarly near. And that the Israelites without exception, (Ex. Israelites felt themselves thus *con- xix. 5, 6) that if they were true to secrated as a whole people,' so as God's covenant, they would be a to become 'priests and prophets special people and a 'kingdom of for all mankind, 'is stated by Philo, priests ' (cf. i Pet. ii. 9, where Chris- De Abrahamo, 0pp. 11. 15. ed. Man- tians are also entitled y^pos e/cXe/c- gey; De Mose,. Ibid. 11. 104. Tov, ^aatXeiov Ispdrev/na) : in other ^ Davison, On Sacrifice, p. 80. CHAP. III.] On the Characteristics of Religion^ &c. 81 for such culprits, even at this dark extremity, but the source from which it sprang was not distinctly indicated by the ordinances of the Law. It was, however, diflferent with a second class ^ of crimes, where the offence was either purely ceremonial, or, if moral, one in which the turpitude was not so glaring nor so utterly devoid of palliating circumstances. For all these the Law of Moses had provided means of expiation. An Israelite, for instance, has been sworn as witness, but is guilty of con- cealing portions of the truth (Levit. v. 4 — 6). He can preserve his standing in the sacred commonwealth only by the aid of * trespass-offerings^' — a lamb or kid of the goats which must be offered in his name in strict compliance with the regulations of. the Law. He therefore travels to mount Zion, to the holy tabernacle of God. He brings his offering to the altar : his hand is pressed upon the head of the devoted animal, which he is taught will be accepted as the means of rescuing the ^^. ^ Offences for which an atone- ment was provided may be classed as follows: i. Bodily impurity. •2. Ceremonial omissions and trans- gressions. 3. Sins of ignorance and inadvertency, or offences un- wittingly committed {ayvorjiiaTd). 4. Certain specified cases of moral transgression, knowingly commit- ted, in favour of which exceptions from the general severity of the Law appear to have been recog- nised. Davison, Ibid. p. 78. Still it is quite possible that the pardon of grosser acts of immorality and even of most deadly sins may have been symbolised, and in so far as related to men's outward position in the theocracy, may have been really effected, on the great day of atonement: for the confession of the high priest then extended to *all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgres- sions in all their sins,' i. e. to sins of every kind. Maimonides (as quoted by Magee, i. 351), declares that 'the scapegoat made atone- ment for all the transgressions of the Law, both the lighter and the more heavy transgressions,' pro- vided the sinner was himself truly H. penitent: but this theory of the Jewish schoolman rests upon a total misconception of the Levitical sacrifices. None of these 'could make him that did the service per- fect, Si^ pertaining to the consciences^ (Heb. ix. 9, 10; X. i, 11): they were in respect of it impotent and insufficient : they were symbols only of the genuine purification that was to be effected by other agencies, and therefore did not reach beyond ♦the time of reformation.' 2 The words D^^^ ( = irXwfiiXeia, sacrificium pro delictis), and Hi^^n ( = afxapTia, irepl rrjs d/jLaprias, sacri- ficium pro peccatis) are so inter- changed in this passage (Lev. v. I — 13), that it is well-nigh impos- sible to say whether allusion is really made to the 'trespass-offer- ing,' or 'the sin-offering:' see Wi- ner, Realicorterhuch, 11. 431 sq. 3rd ed. I have adopted that view which seems more probable on the whole, making the trespass-offerings refer to an offence in which the individual only is concerned, and the trans- gression known exclusively to him- self. 82 Christ and other Masters. [part I.- offender from the outward penalty of his misdeed. The blood, or vehicle of life, is taken by the priest who sprinkles part of it upon the altar, and pours the rest upon the ground. The flesh is then abandoned to the ministers of the sanctuary, and in cases such as that we are considering, is consumed by them within the precincts of the tabernacle : while the offerer is at liberty to turn his footsteps homeward, reinstated in his old position as a member of the sacred family, and so far at peace with God whose laws he had infringed. Now this was only one of multitudinous rites that exercised the faith and tested the obedience of the Hebrew, that con- strained him to reflect on the surpassing majesty and purity of God, that deepened in his heart the sentiments of fear and reverence, and that kept alive the consciousness of moral evil. The operation of his sacrifice was plainly two-fold \ It produced^ a real change in him with reference to the outward laws and j^rivileges of the theocracy under which he lived : it symbolised and represented, though it did not actually imj)art, those better gifts of grace, affecting his relations to the Searcher of the human spirit, and promoting the purification of the conscience. I will here revert a moment to the case before adduced, and indicate the probable emotions and reflections which the rite of sacrifice was calculated to excite in ordinary Hebrews of the age of David, when they worshipped in a pious spirit, such as that which animates the Book of Psalms. The one locality at' Avhich their offering must be made in order to secure acceptance would itself contribute to impress the doctrine of God's unity". How sacred also and how awful was that place ! How radiant to the eye of such a worshipper with glorious and profound associations ! ^ It is here that Thou, O God, the Unapproach- able, hast condescended to draw nigh and bless the waiting multitude. Dreadful art Thou, O Lord, out of Thy sanctuaries, the God of Israel; He gives might and strength unto His ^ Cf. above, p. 8i, n. i, and timae pro pecoato in Veteri Foedere Mr. Thomson's Bampton Lectures peccata expiarint; nimirum Deum (1853), p. 65. Grotius already in- movendo, ut poenam carnalem re- sisted strongly on the same dis- mitteret, idque per satisfactionem tinction : * Lex vetus dupHciter quandam etc.'' Defensio Fidei Ca- spectatur; aiit carnaliter, aut spi- thol. de Satisfactione Christi, c. x. ritualiter. Carnaliter, qua instrii- 0pp. Theolog. iii. 331, 333. mentum fuit iroXirelas, reipuhlicce ^ Els vaos epos Geou" cplXov yb-p Judaicae. Spiritualiter, qua aKlav ael Travrl to ofxoiov. kolvos airdvTojv, 6ix€ Twv fxeWovTOJV, uiiihram Jiahe- kolvov Qeov airdvrwv. Joseph, con- hat futurorum...'Ex\\i^ qyxfj^ (irAmin^ tra Apion. lib. 11. § 23: 0pp. 11. perspicuum jam est, quomodo vie- 485, ed. Havercamp. CHAP. III.] On the Characteristics of Religion, oZo<7?/ of Scrip- abasement, self-renunciation, realis- ture, I. 58, 59) has embodied nearly ing faith, childlike dependence and the same idea in the following pas- adoring gratitude. So that the sage : ' In the immediate ends to be preparatory and the ultimate dis- accomplished, and the apparatus pensations, considered in their gene- provided for accomplishing them, ral character and design, disclosed the two dispensations are as far substantially the same views of God, asunder as heaven is from the earth: and in doing so awoke the same but in both alike, we see a pure and feelings in the hearts of His wor- holy God, enshrined in the recesses shippers : but the former only as the of a glorious sanctuary, unapproach- shadow of the latter, a resemblance able by guilty and polluted flesh, but not the substance, a representa- but through a medium of powerful tion in outward, earthly, and perish- intercession and cleansing efficacy, able materials, and with respect to — ^yet to those who so approach, the concerns of flesh and time, of most merciful and gracious, full of the spiritual ideas and principles loving-kindness, and plenteous in which the dispensation of the redemption: while in every act of Gospel embodies in things not sincere approach on their part, there made with hands and with re- is necessarily brought into exercise spect to objects truly heavenly and the same feehngs of contrition and divine.' 86 Christ and other Masters. [part i. might not be prematurely manifested, and so dazzle tiie imperfect vision of the subject (2 Cor. iii. 13); in the second, when the fulness of the time had come, the light of the knowledge of the glory of God is ready to shine forth into the heart of every child of Adam from the face of Jesus Christ (2 Cor. iv. 6). And thus the Law is found to have been neither silenced, abrogated, nor subverted by the coming of the Son of God. Its real character is vindicated ; it is shewn to be a lower form of one and the same religion. It has passed into the Gospel. Its dim and shadowy outlines are filled up by the effusion of the Holy Spirit ; its graphic and mnemonic symbols are converted into quickening and sustaining sacraments ; its bloody sacri- fices pointing ever to the spotless Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the world, have been exchanged^ for prayers and hymns, and eucharistic offerings, where the worshipper presents himself, his soul and body, a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is our reasonable service (Rom. xii. 1). Faint and transitory ^preludes' of the Incarnation, granted in the time of Hebraism, were just enough to indicate that God was placable, and might hereafter biing Himself into more intimate relations with the human family. But in the Gospel heaven and earth are reconciled and re-united. God has been * manifest in the flesh,' assuming all our nature, body, soul and spirit, into perfect and indissoluble union with di^dnity. The fulness of time arrived, and * God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, made under the Law, to redeem them that were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption of sons' (Gal. iv. 4, 5). The Christian, therefore, is not left to raise himself by means of a symbolic ritual to the full perception of these blessed facts, and a belief in these transcendent mysteries : before our eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth crucified amongst us (Gal. iii. 1). In his character of the burnt-offering. He was immolated to replace mankind in their original subjection to the Godhead: as the peace-offering, He completed our imperfect vows and our defective praises : as the sin-offering. He bore in His sinless body to the tree the concen- trated weight of penal suffering that was due to man's iniquities. He blotted out the handwriting that was against us, nailing it ^ OvKovv Kal Ovofiev /cat 6u/j.iujul€V' vpoaKo/d^ovres' rork hh (r0as auroiJs roTk ixkv TTjv ixvrjixriv tov ixeydXov oKia KaOiepovvres avT<^, Kal ti$ yG BtJ/JLaros, Kara, rd irpbs avroD irapaBo- 'Apxiepei avrov A.6ytt), aury (ribfxaTt B^vra pLVCTTripLa eTTLreXovvTes, Kal r-qv Kal ^vxv duaKeifievoL. Eusebius, virkp aujTrjpias tj/jlcou evx^-piffriav bC Demonst. Evangel. Lib. i. c. x. (p. evcc^u)v v/bLvojp re Kal ei^xu;;/ r^ 0e^ 40, Paris, 1628). i CHAP, III.] On the Characteristics of Beligion, <^c, 87 to the cross. He died the just for the unjust that He might bring us back to God. He passed in triumph from the earth, or outer-court of the eternal sanctuary, and entered not 'into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true ] but into heaven itself, there to appear in the presence of God for us' (Heb. ix. 24). § 2. The Promise, The possibility of this reconcilement between God and His offending creatures was already liinted, as we saw, in shadowy and symbolic ordinances of the legal system. But there was another and a more explicit way in which the future exaltation of mankind was intimated to the members of the Hebrew Church. As early as the time of Abraham, the evangelic ' Promise' had obtained a definite expression ; the Gospel had been 'preached before' (Gal. iii. 8). I shall not reopen old discussions touching the amount of liope derivable from the sentence passed on him who tempted our first parents. Many Christians have discovered there a kind of * Protevangelium, ' or 'grand charter of God's mercy after the falPj' others, the incipient germ which every future promise only served to ripen and developed; and St. Paul appears himself to countenance these expositions when the victory of Christ is represented as the bruising of Satan's power beneath the feet of Christians (E,om. xvi. 20). It may nevertheless be granted that the language used in Genesis might originally produce in man no very definite ideas either of the Person, or the nature of his future Champion. All that our first parents gathered from it may have been the vast but vague assurance that their forfeited possession, with its peace and harmony and innocence, was not lost for ever, but would be restored on the ^ Bp. Sherlock, On Prophecy^ Mr. J. J. S. Perowne, ind ed. p. 24. Disc. III. p. 78. It is however satisfactory to add, 2 Fairbaim, TypoL of Scripture, that all Hebrew scholars with whom I. 193. This is not the place to I have had an opportunity of con- take in hand a critical refutation of versing on the' subject, strongly the views propounded in the recent reprobate the exposition there ad- work of Dr. Donaldson with refer- vanced. They hold that it is phi- ence to the correct interpretation lologically desperate, and could of Gen. iii. 15. As one of the never have possessed itself of such assailants of those views most truly a mind as Dr. Donaldson's, had urges, the translation of *what is he not found it useful in the vindi- usually considered as the first cation of his favourite theory, touch- Messianic promise ' is * so gross that ing the non-existence of all moral it will not bear rendering into agents other than the human: cf. English.' Remarks on Dr. Donald- above, p. 72, note. son's Book, entitled 'Jashar,' by 88 Christ and other Masters. [part I. discomfiture of him whose instigations led to their expulsion. In that case the how and when would be reserved for some ulterior promise. It is however certain that a root and starting-point of such explicit revelations has been found in Abraham, the friend of God, the father of the faithful ; and after his progeny was elected as the special vehicle of true religion, and its guardian in a world fast lapsing from the worship and the fear of God, or growing vain in their imaginations (Kom. i. 21), fuller beams of light were thrown continually upon the future history of liis race, and on the hopes and prospects of mankind in general. * From this time began that line of the divine oracles, which, first being preserved in his family, and afterwards secured in record, has never been broken nor lost, but having successively embraced the Law, the Prophets, and the Gospel, is now completed, to remain the lasting and imperishable monument of Revealed Truth in the world \ ' Accordingly we ascertain that Avhile the better and more thoughtful class of heathen were compelled to seek relief in their embarrassments by dreaming of some golden age that might eventually come round afresh, and reinstate them in some lost inheritance ; the Hebrew always J)roved himself a man of the future. The genius of his religion was pre-eminently hopeful. He was ever in the attitude of expectation^, ever reaching forward to an age of glory, of enlargement, of deliverance, when his race would be super- latively blessed, and prove itself the bearer of unuttered blessings to all tribes and families of man. I grant that in its earlier form the prophecy to which these hopes were clinging with so much of ardour and tenacity was comparatively dim, indefinite and enigmatical ; nor could it, under Hebraism, assume the spiritual aspect which the promises of God possess wlien contemplated by ourselves from Christian points of view. Yet on the other hand we should remember that such characteristics harmonise with the prevailing methods, tone and spirit of the old ceconomy. The symbolical and typical versions of the legal system have their parallel in what may be esteemed the Hebrew and the Christian versions of the ^ Davison, Discourses on Fro- to testify wonders more august to phecy, p. 97, 4th ed. come. From Moses to Malachi, 2 'Expectation then,' says the these Hebrew Scriptures are, as it lamented Archer Butler, *is the in- were, one long-drawn sigh of sor- ward spirit of the Old Testament, rowful hope.' Sermons, ist series, as Fulfilment of the New. Won- p. 212, 3rd ed. derful itself, its function clearly is CHAP. III.] On the Characteristics of Religion, &c. 89 Promise. Thus, the very first conceptions of man's rescue from the consequences of the fall may have been only rude approxi- mations to the great reality. They may have reached no further than the thought of some divine interposition which should mitigate the ills of life, and make the earth a more congenial habitation. Again, although the wording of the curse ^ denounced on men's seducer (Gen. iii. 15), would have doubtless made it evident that God was on their side, and not on hi-s ; the question whether a destructive blow then threatened was to be inflicted by the human species generally, by some peculiar race of Eve's descendants, or a single champion of that race, was for the present left unanswered. Nor am I contending that when Abraham received the promise, *In thee (or, in thy seed) shall all the nations of the earth be blessed,' the language was entirely free from corresponding ambiguity^. The patriarch himself would pro- ^ The word ^jj (properly * the act of sowing,' hence 'seed' and 'pro- geny ' in general) would not of itself convey the idea of an individual, but rather of a plurality of descen- dants: cf. Rom. xvi. 20, and be- low, note 2. Accordingly Kurtz [Gesch. des Alien Bundes, i. 62, 63), although recognising the prophetic character of the verse, takes the expression 'seed of the woman,' as equivalent to all the human race. 'Das ganze Menschengeschlecht (der Weibessame) soil den Kampf mit dem Urheber der Siinde kamp- fen, und soil ihn kraf t des gottlichen Willens siegreich kampfen.' 2 Gen. xii. 2, 3; Gal. iii. 8. On a future occasion (Gen. xxii. 18) the phrase ' in thee ' is explained ' in thy seed' ('^y."lt?), and in this expanded form the promise was republished, (i) in the case of Isaac (Gen. xxvi. 4), and (2) in that of Jacob (Gen. xxviii. 14). But the difficulty of applying the expression VIJ to an individual is apparent even at this last stage of the promise : for in the earlier member of the same verse (v. 14) it is prophesied that the seed of Jacob (^O) ^^^1^ ^® ^s nume- rous 'as the dust of the earth:' cf. xxii. 17, 18. On the other hand it has been argued from St. Paul's distinction between 'seed' and 'seeds' (Gal. iii. 16), and his ex- position of the 'one seed' as pro- phetic of the Messiah, that the patriarchs may have been taught by such expressions as occur in Gen. xxii. 18, to expect an individual Saviour. I do not think it unlikely that they had by some course or other arrived at this conclusion: the language of our Lord Himself implies as much, when He says, 'Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day ; and he saw it, and was glad ' (John viii. 56). Still it is next to certain that St. Paul, in the passage above quoted, did not mean to rest this inference on the Hebrew equivalent of 'seed.' His meaning rather is, that the promise was not given to all the (nr^pfJLaTa (posterities, or descendants) of Abraham, but only to the single line of Isaac, that, viz. of which 'Christ' (the K€ 25, which is peculiarly perplex- and only when it becomes His ac- ingtoMr. Newman (P/iases,p. 193). tual possession can the prophecy He fails to perceive that the whole respecting Him, as the New Testa- of the prophet's description is ideal, ment David, reach its destined ac- though the re-appearance of ' David' complishment.' on the earth is sufficient to intimate 2 (jf^ pj.. Mill's Christ. Adv. Puhl. this, and that a barely 'literal' ful- (1844), pp. 411 sq., who justly ob- filment is not to be expected. ' The serves in treating of a similar case prophecy,' as Mr. Fairbairn remarks, (p. 408): 'There are other matters {Ezekiel, p. 363) 'is a detailed pic- necessary to the right understanding ture of coming good, drawn, as such of sacred prophecies beside the apicture must have been, under the bare rules (which no sane man formoftheoldcovenant-relations.... despises) of grammatical interpre- The whole earth is as much Christ's tation.' rightful heritage as the territory 94? Christ and other Masters. [parti. verily the promised Seed ; because He is the Head and Antitype of God's collective First-born; and because He only realised in all their fulness the exalted characteristics which Israel as a nation was commissioned to exhibit and diffuse. And that Hebrews were themselves alive to such ulterior and more perfect realisations of the elder covenant, and fre- quently discerned the fitness of this virovoia in the language and general structure of the prophecies, we are enabled to establish fully from their extant literature \ They welcomed every voice that issued from the desert with the faintest whispers of Messiah. His birth, His life, His kingdom, widely as they often erred in estima,ting the nature, colouring and effect of these, were constantly suggested to their thoughts; and therefore when St. Matthew, writing for the special benefit of Jews, alluded to examples where predictions were fulfilled in that higher sense, or when St. Paul, endeavouring to reclaim the Judaizers of Galatia, declared that the arrangements of the Abrahamic family with reference to the child of promise were so ordered as to intimate that such a child must be extra- ordinary and begotten from above, they neither of them ran the risk of serious misconception, nor were open to the charge of sheltering their ai-guments beneath a fanciful exegesis. I grant that earnest minds have varied in their power of tracing and appreciating the great ideas that connect these deeper meanings of the Bible with the naked and more primary sense. I grant that in the present day the general tendency of thought is adverse to such methods of interpretation^, and that writers who pride themselves on the superiority of their critical acumen are never more successful, in the judgment of the undiscriminating and the superficial, than in their attempts to underrate the mj'steries of Holy Scripture. But the course of my argument is not affected by this circumstance. I am ^ See Schottgen, Korce Hehraicce^ evangelische Geschichte in den he- passim: and Mill, as above, p. 418. deutendsten Momenten der mosai- 2 It should, however, be stated schen parallel geht. Im Judenthum that the age is not without examples lag, wie im Keime Blatter und of a healthier tendency. Thus the Friichte, das Christenthum. Frei- reaction in De Wette's mind im- lich bedurfte es der gottlichen Sonne pelled him to make the following um hervorzubrechen.' And Um- acknowledgment in addition to breit has very recently {Studien und \vhat has been already cited (p. 59) : Kritiken, 1855, 3tes Heft, pp. 573 'Kein durchaus leeres Spiel war sq.) abandoned the un-Messianic die typologische Vergleichung des interpretation of Is. vii. 14, which A. T. mit dem N. T. Auch ist es he had formerly endeavoured to schwerlich blosser Zufall, dass die establish. CHAP. III.] On the Characteristics of Religion, dx. 95 endeavouring to ascertain what were the leading features of the Old-Testament religion, as interpreted by persons occupying the position of the Hebrews; and with reference to the topic now before us, it remains indisputable that either owing to the character of their sacred books, or to some other agency, they were emphatically men of hope. In spite of every storm that darkened the immediate future of the Church, they looked with yearning conlidence to what they called ' the times of restitution and refreshing,' of peace, forgiveness, and redemption. They took refuge in this 'world to comeV — an age when temporal evils v/ould be all corrected or exhausted, when mercy and truth would meet together, and righteousness and peace would kiss each other, when Zion under the benignant rule of Christ would shew herself the mother -city of a world -embracing system, and ' all nations flow ' to her for solace and for light. And it is most observable that, however modern sceptics may account for the origin and intensity of this conviction^ its existence at the birth of Christ is now commonly admitted. The recognition of His claims by many of His fellow-countrymen in Palestine and other regions, is attributed to the fact that He was generally expected. And this fact indeed is absolutely necessary to the establishment of the Straussian hypothesis on the composition of the sacred Gospels. The national mind, it is discovered, must have been occupied completely with expectations of some great Deliverer, or ideal portraits such as those ascribed to Jesus of Nazareth by His followers, could not possibly have been conceived. And with this view accords the language of Mr. Mack ay, a main pillar of the Absolute Religion. ' The fund of Hebrew hope,' he writes^, 'was as ^ Schottgen, II. 23 sq. : cf. 7?^.