IC-NRLF S3 SDfl o >- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Accession No. Class No. HERBERT W. GATES, LIBRARIAN. HARRIET J. KIRK, ASSISTANT LlBRARI Mr.J.C.Rowell, University Dear Sir;- I hav please accept my I mail you to Year Book, which plete lists of o up to date. CMICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, MAttttOND LIBRARY. -IJ WARREN AVF.NUE, - - CHICAGO. Nov. 19, 1897 arian. tllfornit. st received the Library Bulletins 3-7-8 for which rty thanks on behalf of the Seminary. y the Quarterly Sketch of the Seminary, and our last a sort of continuation to the former, as it gives coin- ers, students etc., from the founding of the institutior Yours very truly, Librarian. V T 4 T % ^rtajmtt QUARTER CENTENNIAL HISTORICAL SKETCH PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. CHICAGO JAMESON & MORSE, BOCK AND JOB PRINTERS. 1879. CONTENTS. I. PLANS FOR THEOLOGICAL STUDY IN WESTERN COLLEGES, II. BEGINNINGS, - 7 III. ORGANIZATION, 12 IV. ACTION OF GENERAL ASSOCIATIONS, 17 V. STRUGGLES OF PREPARATION, - 20 VI. OPENING OF THE SEMINARY, 24 VII. LOCATION, 26 VIII. BUILDINGS, 29 IX. LIBRARY, 31 X. TRIENNIAL CONVENTIONS, XI. PROPOSED UNION WITH OBERLIN, :u XII. TREASURERS, AGENTS, AND GENERAL FUNDS, 3t; XIII. ENDOWMENTS, 40 XIV. OUT OF THE FIRE, 45 XV. FACULTY AND STUDENTS, XVI. CONCLUSION, : > QUARTER CENTENNIAL FUND, 53 CHARTER OF THE SEMINARY, " 1 - 1 Al.IMNI OF THE SEMINARY, 'l STATEMENT. By the "Great Fire" in Chicago, October, 1871, there were lost the Records of the Board of Directors of the Chicago Theological Seminary, also the Records of their Executive Committee, the official Reports of the Treas- urer and Agent, as well as many other important docu- ments. In consequence only a meager History of the Seminary did the Committee, appointed for that purpose, count themselves able to make. They have, however, been gratefully surprised to find how much reliable history they still could gather. This required minute search in private diaries and letters, in written memoranda, published periodicals and the fortun- ately preserved duplicates of Reports made by Mr. Kedzie during his Agency, and involved also extensive corres- pondence. Often long search and much correspondence has been necessary to settle a date or fact, which could be recorded in a single line. The Committee have spared no pains to make this History accurate. For all important dates and facts they found some printed document, written memo- randum, or personal testimony, on which they could rely. Thus they have been able to gather the important facts concerning the organization and work of the Seminary thus far, which, else, were likely to perish with this gen- eration. A review of those early times awakens conflicting emotions in the minds of those participating therein. The Directors, undertaking a work in which they never before had been engaged, saw, afterward, wherein errors of judgment were committed, for which they found some excuse in their right intent and lack of experience. To bring the Seminary to its present stage of progress, has cost much care and labor on the part of the Directors and Professors gladly again to be endured for completing a work so well begun. Upon our Chicago Theological Seminary, this sacred, and, we trust, yet to become ancient seat of learning, we invoke what it has hitherto enjoyed, the cooperation of the churches and the favor of Him, their Divine Head, that thus it may grow to full maturity of strength, and come to ripe, abundant and perpetual fruitage. A. S. KEJDZIE, ( 'Jmirnuni <>f ( Committee. CHICAGO, ILL., June, 1879. I. PLANS FOR THEOLOGICAL STUDY IN WESTERN COLLEGES. The establishment of colleges in the Northwest was in the interest both of education and religion. Their founders looked forward to educating a Christian ministry, as an important function of those colleges. Facilities for theological education were provided in the plan of some of them. Soon after Beloit College began its work, the question of providing theological education came before its Trus- tees in consequence of actual application for such instruc- tion. To meet this want, early in 1852 the Pastor elect of the First Congregational Church in Beloit was elected Professor of Theology in the college. This, it was thought, would be the beginning of a Theological De- partment in which Congregationalists and Presbyterians could unite, and where students in theology would come with advantage under the influence and instruction of a pastor. The call to both offices was declined. No fur- ther attempt has been made to open a Theological De- partment in Beloit College. The large number of young men whom this college has helped train for the ministry, shows that it is fulfilling a noble design in its own proper sphere as a college. When the attempt was made to found Illinois Col- lege there was in a large part of Illinois a violent preju- dice against church and clergy so violent that for two 6 years the Legislature refused a charter for the college. One cause for this hostility was a wide and wild excite- ment caused throughout the West by Hon. E. M. John- son's Eeport in Congress against the Anti- Sunday Mails Petition, charging the petitioners with the design of uniting church and state, and of establishing a religious despotism. Men, whose memories run not back to that time, have little idea of the violence and bitterness of that excitement. Only when, later, four religious denomina- tions united in application for charters, were any granted. The charter of Illinois College, when first granted, forbade theological education: afterward this prohibition was repealed. A legacy was received by the college toward founding a Professorship of Theology. The Trustees, though not making any formal relinquishment of the design, have not, as yet, taken any steps to open a Theo- logical Department. It was in the original design of Knox College to have a Theological Department, and a fund was set apart for that purpose. Afterward the plan was abandoned, and the fund, according to provision before made, was devoted to the college proper. When founding a Theological Seminary in Michigan was first discussed, one of the projects under considera- tion was to have the Seminary located on the campus of the State University, by permission of the Eegents, that the theological students might avail themselves of certain courses of instruction in the University, thereby enlarging the rsi ge of study, and affording helps to those pursuing a special course of studies. Iowa College had no place in its plan for a Theo- logical Department : yet the education of ministers was central in the aim of its founders, so far as it could be helped by a thorough course of collegiate study. The history of the college and its work of helping men into the ministry show how well the founders of the college planned and wrought. The same may be said of Carlton, Wheaton, Olivet, Ripon and other colleges, which have come into promin- ence since Chicago Theological Seminary was founded. Their most precious fruit is the young men they educate for the ministry. But in respect to those colleges which had theologi- cal education in their plans, it was seen that to lay their foundations, involved struggles so many, that, though none of them came to founding a Theological Department, their success as colleges was ample reward and honor for the heroic faith of their founders. Besides, another and better design seems to have been in the purpose of God, as disclosed by His providences, the establishment of one Theological Seminary, uniting all the Congregational churches in the Northwest. II. BEGINNINGS. Plans for theological education not having come to maturity in the colleges, from the year 1850 to 1860 there was a general move among evangelical denominations in the Northwest for theological education. This led to the establishment of theological seminaries.* The discussion * The " Garrett Biblical Institute " of the Methodists was opened in Sept., 1856; the "Chicago Theological Seminary" of the CongregationaJists in Oct., 1858; the "Presbyterian Theological Seminary of the Northwest" in Oct., 1859, it having been transferred from New Albany, Ind. -and the " Baptist Union Theological Seminary " in Oct., 1867, though theological instruction had been given during the two previous years under the auspiees of the Baptist Theological Union. 8 incident thereto led many men of broad views and catholic spirit to favor the union of Presbyterians and Congrega- tionalists in one theological seminary. This was resisted by men of more intense denominational affinities. The resistance came principally from the Presbyterians, who had the advantages of early occupation and greater strength. The Congregationalists, pressed with a sense of responsibility to do their share of the work of evangeli- zation in the Northwest, continued to grope their way for the path, which at length they found. The design of founding a Theological Seminary in the Northwest came, about the same time, to different Con- gregationalists, though far removed from each other. This may show it all the more clearly to have been "what the spirit saith to the churches." Previous to 1853 the need of a larger supply of min- isters for the smaller churches in Michigan, and of men more adequately trained for pastoral work, occupied the attention of thoughtful men in that State. To meet this want the plan of theological education, indicated below, was designed by Rev. L. Smith Hobart, then pastor at Ann Arbor, and by him submitted to the General Associa- tion of Michigan, in May, 1853. This plan was given into the hands of a committee of the Association, Messrs. H. D. Kitchel, A. S. Kedzie and D. Mussey, who reported it to that body for favorable consideration. After discus- sion it was referred to a committee, Revs. L. Smith Hobart, E. N. Bartlett and J. Patchin, for report at the next annual meeting. The chairman of this committee sent a copy of the Plan to the Congregational Herald, which was published in its issue of June 18th, 1853. It awakened interest among the ministers of the Northwest, many of whom, 9 during that year, came to feel that efforts should soon be made to found a Theological Seminary in this large and important section of our country. When first designed the plan was to have a Theological Seminary in Michi- gan and chiefly for that State. But further study and a correspondence which revealed the broader plan enter- tained by the brethren in Illinois to have one Seminary for the Northwest led to a ready acquiescence therein. At the next meeting of the General Association of Michigan, at Detroit, May, 1854, this committee made report, calling attention to the fact that the Plan pro- posed sought to combine the advantages of two methods of theological education, study with pastors and instruc- tion in a seminary. The Plan embraced the following particulars: The establishment of a Theological Sem- inary at some eligible point in the Northwest : its course of study to be divided, each year, into two terms, a Lec- ture Term of six months under the instruction of the Faculty, and a Reading Term of six months, to be pur- sued with pastors of churches : The degree of Bachelor of Divinity to be conferred on those completing the full course of study: Each State interested in the Seminary to endow a Professorship : The control of the Institution to be in a Board of Trustees elected by the General Asso- ciation of such States : Contributions to be taken up annually in the churches for the Library. After full discussion the General Association adopted the report of the Committee, highly approving its Plan of a Theological Seminary, and authorized the Secretary to confer with other Ecclesiastical Bodies in the Northwest to secure their approval and cooperation. Accordingly, the Secretary, Rev. L. S. Hobart, com- municated with ministers in the Northwest on the subject. 10 He also furnished a copy of the report to Kev. H. L. Hammond, delegate to the General Association of Iowa, which was laid before that body at Davenport, June, 1854,' and received its hearty approval. Meantime, the roots which have given growth to Chicago Theological Seminary, were germinating else- where. It was an encouragement to the founders of the Seminary that its roots spread so far. In March, 1854, Rev. Stephen Peet, of Batavia, Ills., and Rev. G. S. F. Savage, of St. Charles, Ills., after con- ferring with each other, sent letters to several brethren in Wisconsin and Illinois, calling a meeting to consider the project of founding a Theological Seminary for the North- west. This meeting was held two weeks later in Chicago, Philo Carpenter, Esq., being Moderator, and Rev. G. S. F. Savage, Scribe. The result of discussion was a unani- mous conviction that the project was important and feasible. An adjourned meeting was held a few weeks later, in which Iowa was represented, and the movement in Michigan reported. As a result of deliberations at this adjourned meeting and at the State Associations following, a larger meeting was called. It met in Chicago June 12th, 1854, with Rev. Asa Turner, Jr., of Iowa, for Moderator, and Rev. G. S. F. Savage, Scribe. Most of the Northwestern States were represented. Discussion in this meeting revealed the fact, that its members, often without conference, had been deeply interested in founding a Theological Seminary in the Northwest. This meeting voted that the time had fully come for this work, and elected a committee of twenty-one, from Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri and Minnesota*, to mature the Plan of the Seminary ; to invite proposals for a central site ; to make 11 other preliminary arrangements and submit the same to a general convention of Congregationalists in the North- west, to meet in Chicago upon call of said committee. This committee of twenty-one met in Chicago, July 12th, 1854. After a full comparison of views and dis- cussion of measures, it was voted to call a convention of those interested in founding a Theological Seminary, to meet at Chicago in the following September. Meanwhile, in timely utterances, the project was held before the churches by Rev. J. C. Holbrook, in the Congregational Herald, of which he was editor. In faith 'that the churches would approve the enter- prise and in anticipation of future organization, friends of the project, as early as June, 1854, secured the services of Rev. S. Peet as Financial Agent, holding themselves responsible to him for an annual salary of $1,200 and traveling expenses. The Seminary was conceived in many hearts, longed for in many prayers. It was demanded by increasing des- titutions and by multiplication of churches, as the wave of population rolled westward and spread into hitherto uninhabited wastes. A movement to found the Seminary, once begun, called out the deep interest felt on the sub- ject in minds widely separated, not stirred by mutual talk, but because they had talked much with God about the moral influence and destiny of these Northwestern States. That there was to be a Theological Seminary in the Northwest, was a foregone conclusion. Christian homes, churches and colleges prepared the way for it. These Christian forces, for full development and free work, needed to become productive of a ministry. Their full- orbed life could not else be reached. The elements of a Christian civilization were at work over these broad 12 States, and all the agencies of such a civilization were to be brought forth and put to use. Besides, here were gathering mighty forces : some of them hostile to Christ's sovereignty over these common- wealths and their teeming populations. In the coming conflicts no agencies of the Gospel could be spared, least of all the Savior's ascension gift, the Gospel ministry. III. ORGANIZATION. The Convention called by the before named Committee of twenty-one, met at Chicago Sept. 26th, 1854, in the Plymouth Church, and was attended by delegates from the churches in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Wis- consin and Missouri. The first question in this Conven- tion was whether the time had come for our churches to found a Theological Seminary. Both " No" and "Yes" were given in answer. The judgment of other churches, expressed by movements for this end, already begun, had its influence. It was felt by many that our churches could not be what their times and surroundings require, unless productive of a ministry. It was no objection to the project that there were ministers out of employ; for not salaries unused, but work undone, was the matter to be looked after. Some held that our 380 churches in the Northwest were hardly an adequate constituency for a Theological Seminary. The faith of others, however, saw a large increase of this number in the near future. 13 Under this expectation, the Convention ratified the action of preliminary meetings and elected a Board of Directors the charter members of the Board, distributed among the States as follows : - MICHIGAN. Rev. L. Smith Hobart, Rev. Harvey D. Kitchel, Rev. Adam S. Kedzie, Judge Solomon L. Withey, and Joseph E. Beebe, Esq. ILLINOIS. Rev. Stephen Peet, Rev. William Carter, Rev. Flavel Bascom, Rev. George W. Perkins, Rev. John C. Holbrook, Rev. Nathaniel H. Eggleston, Rev. George S. F. Savage, Philo Carpenter, Esq., and Joseph Johnston, Esq. IOWA. Rev. Alden B. Robbins, Rev. Jesse Gurnsey, and John G. Foote, Esq. WISCONSIN. Rev. Charles W. Camp, Rev. Hiram Foote, Rev. John J. Miter, and Horace Hobart, Esq. MINNESOTA. Rev. Richard Hall. INDIANA. Rev. M. Augustas Jewett. MISSOURI. Rev. Truman M. Post. The first Board of Visitors were Rev. Asa Turner, Jr., of Iowa; Rev. N. C. Clark, Rev. R. M. Pearson and A. Comstock, Esq., of Illinois; Rev. H. N. Brinsmade and Rev. S. M. Eaton, of Wisconsin; and Rev. D. M. Bardwell, of Indiana. The Board of Directors were organized Sept. 27, 1854, by electing Rev. S. Peet, President; Rev. N. H. Eggleston, Scribe; Philo Carpenter, Esq., Treasurer; Rev. S. Peet, Rev. J. C. Holbrook, Rev. G. W. Perkins, Philo Carpenter, Esq., and Joseph Johnston, Esq., Exec- utive Committee; which Committee were instructed to procure a Charter. Rev. L. S. Hobart, Rev. A. S. Ked- zie and Rev. H. D. Kitchel were elected a Committee to draft a Constitution, which work providentially fell to the 14 second member of the Committee, he having frequent consultations with the others. In this Convention and in the early meetings of the Board of Directors to the Seminary its characteristic features were given. Of these none were deemed of greater importance than the control, under which the Seminary should be. A close and self-perpetuating cor- poration was advocated by some and opposed by more. The original plan of having the Board of Control elected by the General Associations was advocated, and then op- posed on the ground that such Associations were human institutions, which probably would continue, but might not. The churches, on the other hand, were held to be of divine institution; and that the Seminary would be best cared for, most successfully nurtured, as well as most effectually guarded against error, if put under the watch and control of the churches. This view after full discus- sion prevailed with unanimity ; and the election of Direc- tors and Visitors was, by the Convention, and by the con- sequent provisions of the Constitution, put into the hands of the churches interested, meeting for this purpose in Triennial Convention. The Convention held that for sufficient reasons they could make the Seminary different from any other. Some felt that there should be a more practical way of training men for their work, as found in the legal and medical pro- fessions; and that ministers should not, as so often, by continuous scholastic study, be educated out of acquain- tance and sympathy with the conditions, in which they were to work. This view was advocated by Kev. L. S. Hobart and Eev. S. Peet. To teach it was original; nor to them alone. With more or less distinctness the same convictions stirred in the minds of many Western Min- 15 isters, started by a desire to reach the people, for which they felt their scholastic habits had somewhat unfitted them. This led to the adoption of what has been called the " Heading Term," found afterwards to be a misnomer. The original design contemplated a course of reading to be pursued by each student under the instruction of some pastor. But a more important end was to be served by initiating the student into the practical work of his calling under the guidance of an experienced pastor, engaging with him in pastoral visitation and in other forms of min- isterial work. But the Lord seems to call many to the ministry, who are not rich in this world's goods. This fact and lack of adequate scholarship-funds have led to a practical modification of this Beading Term, in which, however, some of its most valuable features are still retained. Students take charge of vacant churches and get much valuable training by these experimental ministrations. A modification of the original plan may be demanded by the necessities of the case, and it still be retained as a char- acteristic and valuable feature of the Seminary. In this Convention some urged a Special Course of study by which men, too old to go through college, or for other reasons unable to do so, yet nevertheless having had advantages of study, and having withal a heart de- voted to the work, and natural gifts therefor, might be educated for the % ministry. This course was advocated by Rev. J. C. Holbrook, suggested, perhaps, by his own successful experience, as the course of other Christian denominations had suggested to many minds. The Con- vention authorized this department of the Seminary's work; and the usefulness of the men, who have thereby 16 been educated for the ministry, has amply justified the wisdom of the Convention. In its essential features this course of study has been adopted by other theological seminaries. For a full discussion of the subject reference is made to a Report thereon to the Triennial Convention of 1879. An enlargement in the curriculum of theological study was advocated in the Convention. Though favor- ably received, no action was taken. Subsequently the matter came up in the early meetings of the Board of Directors. They held that the ministers needed in the West, while panoplied in Biblical Doctrine, must be able to meet those who rejected every appeal to the Bible ; and that the students sent forth from this Seminary must be fitted for a more varied campaign, than they would be qualified for under the old routine of theological study. And this view still has a strong hold among the Directors. It has led at different times to the introduction of Special Lectures, as need and ability warranted an example fol- lowed, also, by other Seminaries. A final subject considered in the Convention was co- operation with the New School Presbyterians of the Northwest in founding a Union Theological Seminary. When these Presbyterians in 1850 and later had in hand the plan of founding at Galena, Chicago or elsewhere, a Theological Seminary for the Northwest, they declined an overture for making it a Union Seminary in which Congregationalists and Presbyterians would have equal rights, powers and privileges. This overture was declined, doubtless for what seemed to them good reasons. Such copartnership might subsequently have stood in the way of a union of the two General Assemblies. 17 Long wonted to cooperate with Presbyterians in Home and Foreign Missions, as also in other benevolent enter- prises, Congregationalists still kept alive the amiable spirit of the disowned " Plan of Union." In consequence, after much discussion, the Convention instructed the Board of Directors to entertain favorably any propos- ition for denominational union in the work of training men for the ministry. The Directors even went further, took the initiative and privately proposed such coopera- ation with the New School Presbyterians, which, however, was unofficially declined. Union in the work of theolog- ical education will doubtless come as a fruit of a broader charity and a more perfect union among evangelical churches. IV. ACTION OF GENERAL ASSOCIATIONS. Though the Board of Directors were upborne by the enthusiasm of the Convention electing them, yet they felt solicitous for votes of confidence, which the churches might give in the calm deliberation of their State Asso- ciations. It would be repetitious to place all their "Bes- olutions " upon record. Representative illustrations are here given, pertaining to the Seminary as a projected de- sign, and then as an actual organization. This chapter might be enlarged by recording the favorable action of these Associations from year to year according to the various conditions of the Seminary's want and work. In May, 1854, the General Association of Michigan, anticipating the founding of a Theological Seminary and 18 having the plan of it already before them, " RESOLVED That we adopt the report of the committee, highly ap- proving the Plan of a Theological Seminary which is proposed therein, and that we authorize the Secretary to confer with other Ecclesiastical Bodies in the Northwest for the purpose of securing its approval by them, and the adoption of such measures as may be necessary for the accomplishment of the end in view." The date of this action and the fact, that it was taken upon the report of a committee appointed the year before, show how early the churches in Michigan gave attention to this matter. In the autumn of the same year the General Con- vention of Presbyterian and Congregational churches in Wisconsin on this subject took action, which shows how reluctant some were to abandon the idea of a Union Sem- inary. Their action was as follows : "Whereas, the subject of establishing Theological Seminaries in the Northwest has for some time past been under consideration by individuals and ecclesiastical bodies, and preliminary steps have been taken toward establishing two ,such Institutions in Chicago ; And Whereas such movements are of great importance to the interests of religion among us : " RESOLVED That it is the opinion of this Conven- tion that immediate and efficient measures should be taken to furnish in the Northwest theological instruction suited to the wants of Christian young men desirous to enter the ministry. " RESOLVED That in view of the numbers and con- dition of the Theological Institutions at the East, the churches at the West cannot at present reasonably depend on the munificence of their Eastern Brethern, but should 19 rely mainly on their own resources for the means to pro- vide theological instruction for our young men. " RESOLVED That in the opinion of this Convention one Theological Institution is all that will be needful for many years to come in the Northwest for Congregation- alists and New School Presbyterians ; and that to under- take a distinctive Congregational or Presbyterian Semin- ary in the Northwest would be unwise and injurious to the best interests of Christ's Kingdom in this region. " RESOLVED That we hereby declare our sincere desire for a union of the two denominations in providing Theological instruction, and that we are ready to pledge our hearty co-operation in such an enterprise." Subsequently President Chapin of Beloit college wrote: "The course of events rendered such a joint enterprise impracticable, and the Convention in due time came heartily to the recommendation and support of the Chicago Theological Seminary, and has contributed freely to its establishment and operations." From the minutes of the General Association of Iowa for 1854, the following extract is made:^ "A Report on the subject of theological education in the Northwest was made by a Delegate from the General Association of Michigan;" whereupon the Association " RESOLVED That we approve of the establishment at an early day of a Theological Institution in the North- west, according to the general principles proposed in the Report." Next year they " RESOLVED That we feel strong confidence in the wisdom of the plan for establishing a Theological Semin- ary at Chicago ; that we are deeply interested in its pros- perity, and hereby pledge our prayers and active cooper- ation for the accomplishment of the enterprise." 20 The minutes of the General Association of Illinois for 1855, say : " An efficient movement has been begun for a Theological Seminary to be located at Chicago, and the institution is expected soon to be placed on a permanent basis." The next year in their narrative of the state of 'religion they say: "A wide spread interest has been awakened in the establishment of the Chicago Theological Seminary, and a ready response has been made to efforts to give it a full endowment and efficient support. We heartily commend this Institution to the confidence and prayers of the churches as an important and essential instrument in raising up a ministry for the West." These Associations and others in the Northwest during subsequent years have expressed their interest in the Seminary, their approval of its men and methods, their sympathy in its trials, and their satisfaction in its graduates. V. STRUGGLES OF PREPARATION. The Board of Directors met at Chicago, March 27, 1855, in deep sorrow, because of the sudden death of Rev. S. Peet, their President and Financial Agent. Some of them had individually co-operated with him in his suc- cessful labors for the Seminary ; the others had heard of his success, and been quickened by his enthusiasm. In the interest of the Seminary he went to New England, where he found the project looked upon with curiosity by some and with deep interest by many. To report results he called a meeting of the Board, in the hope that what 21 had been so auspiciously begun would soon be completed. The sanguine hopes of many, the headlong rush of West- ern life, and an inadequate sense of the cost of a Theo- logical Seminary, led many to look for the opening of the Seminary even if in a somewhat immature condition at least as early as during the next autumn, there having then been a whole year of preparation ! Could the Board have seen that three and a half years of struggle still awaited them before the realization of their hopes in the actual work of the Seminary, though their faith might not have failed, yet the sadness of their meeting would have been deeper. But prayer and con- ference brought them to the conviction, that the design of founding this Theological Seminary was born, not in the counsel of men, but in the wisdom of God : and that He still called them to a vigorous prosecution of the work. Moved with this conviction, the Board, without faltering, pushed on their work. Mr. Carpenter declining to serve as Treasurer because of the press of his own business, the Board elected Lucius D. Olmsted, Esq., to that office, which he held till his death, in March, 1862, discharging its complicated and onerous duties with suc- cess, yet without reward, save the satisfaction of aiding in what he considered an important work of his life. Keasonably, the Board paid for the clerk service needed in the office, the collection of funds from subscribers being chiefly by correspondence. For Financial Agent, Eev. Adam S. Kedzie, of Michi- gan, was chosen. He soon entered upon the work and continued it till July, 1862, canvassing most of the Con- gregational Churches of the Northwest in solicitation of funds, and rendering a varied service in getting the Sem- inary into working order. 22 A very favorable Charter was secured without diffi- culty from the Legislature of Illinois. This Charter, by recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, exempts all property of the Seminary in Illinois from taxation. The Directors organized under this Charter, amended and adopted the Constitution reported by the Committee, and elected officers. The Charter and Constitution were printed and distributed, thus making known more fully the aims and methods of the Seminary- In so doing, the Constitution was stereotyped, in blessed ignorance of the fact that the well nigh yearly amend- ments to it would not let it stay stereotyped. The finances of the Seminary were found without order. No system of keeping accounts had been adopted, nor any books opened. Some of its counted assets were only verbal promises to give; and others, though in written form, had no legal validity. The Treasurer and Agent gave immediate attention to getting affairs into order, and legal forms into use. Then began the persistent work of securing funds. This was chiefly by creating a General Fund, to be ex- pended for any uses of the Seminary. The plan was to put the Seminary into operation as soon as possible, and to meet the cost thereof out of this General Fund, till endowments were secured, a plan eventually carried out. Could this increase of assets have gone on as suc- cessfully as in 1855 and '56, the, Seminary would have speedily reached prosperity. But soon came the commer- cial disasters of 1857, which put the Seminary through a process of seasoning, hardening it for the endurance it was yet to suffer. As this was not foreseen, the Executive Committee, in March, 1856, sent Eevs. H. D. Kitchel and A. S. Ked- 23 zie to the East for wise men to fill the chairs of instruc- tion in the Seminary. Men were freely recommended as Professors, sometimes with a surprising lack of discrim- ination. After their return the Board, in April, 1856, elected a Faculty of five Professors for the usual departments of instruction, and enlarged the range of study by electing six lecturers in expectation that the Seminary would he opened in the autumn of 1856. When, two years later, the Seminary did open, it was with a Faculty able in their personal and professional' qualifications, but more econ- omical in numbers. The difficulties about the location of the Seminary- explained below lack of funds in the treasury and other facts of incompleteness, made the opening of the. Semi- nary in the autumn of that year, to many of the Direc- tors, seem premature. Such an opening was soon made impracticable by the Professors declining to accept the positions offered them, except one who held his appoint- ment under consideration. Another election of Professors was made in January, 1857, for the two other most important chairs, in the hope of opening the Seminary in the autumn of that year. But soon throughout the country came the financial dis- asters which marked 1857. Then doubts arose as to the practicability of opening the Seminary that autumn, and the two Professors newly elected declined. The Board felt strong pressure from subscribers to the funds; some of whom declined further investments till they had re- turns in the shape of a class graduated from the Serni.- nary. Still, for reasons that seemed imperative to a ma- jority of the Directors, but against the protest of some, the opening of the Seminary was deferred, yet definitely fixed for the autumn of 1858. 24 In preparation for this the Board of Directors, at their meeting in April, 1858, elected Rev. Joseph Haven, D. D., to the chair of Systematic Theology, and Rev. Samuel C. Bartlett, D. D., to the chair of Biblical Lit- erature. Prof. Franklin W. Fisk, D. D., was, in April, 1856, elected to the chair of Sacred Rhetoric. He held it a matter of honor to give Beloit College a year's notice before vacating his chair in that Institution. Accordingly he was requested by the Directors, in 1858, to give such notice, so as to occupy his chair in the Seminary as early as the opening of its second year. These Professors accept- ed their appointments, and the annual prospect of open- ing the Seminary stood out as a brighter vision than at any former time. YI. OPENING OF THE SEMINARY. At last, after four years of preparatory struggle, on the 6th of October, 1858, the Chicago Theological Sem- nary was formally opened in the parlors of the First Congregational Church on the south-west corner of West Washington and Green streets. The Faculty present consisted of two Professors, Rev. Joseph Haven, D. D., and Rev*. Samuel C. Bartlett, D. D. Ten students were in attendance. A violent rain prevailed during that and the previous hour, which kept some students, then in dis- tant parts of the city, from being present. Some of the 25 Board of Directors, came to see the fulfillment of their long cherished hopes. The General Agent called the meeting to order and introduced Prof. Haven, who inaugurated the work with a prayer befitting the occasion. It referred to the pres- ent day of small things, and then Faith, with her clear and far reaching eye, took into view the future record which the Seminary was to make. Petitions were offered that among the forces then and there set at work, the life of Christ might be central and all-pervading, and that, in gathering their sympathies around the Seminary, the churches might be lifted up into a commanding sympathy with Christ and into a broad field of cooperation with Him. Brief remarks were made by the Professors and Di- rectors, all in the line of gratefully recognizing the way in which the Lord had guided the affairs of this Institu- tion; and examination of students was assigned for an hour the next day. Among all the doings in that busy, bustling city, the opening of this Theological Seminary was the most significant thing for that day. At the meeting of the Faculty and students the next day for prayers, Prof. Bartlett officiated, reading the 12th chapter of Eomans. Sixteen students were present, and when the Seminary got fairly at work their number was found to be twenty-nine. The Seminary having no build- ings, the students were distributed into Christian families, by whom, during the first year, they were entertained, in many cases, without charge. 26 VII. LOCATION. The Charter provided that the "Seminary shall be located in or near the City of Chicago." At the first, Mr. Peet made a verbal agreement with the Trustees of Kush Medical College to purchase their building for the use of the Seminary, but this failed. At the beginning of his agency, Mr. Kedzie was charged with the duty of securing a location for the Sem- inary. He received a large number of proposals from property owners and real estate dealers, and examined some forty different locations, in quantities varying from one hundred feet square to eighty acres, and in position reaching from central parts of the city to miles away. To go to some near-by village where location and building for the public rooms of the seminary could be had without cost; to secure a considerable quantity of land for use and sale and build up a suburban town; or to get the best location in the city and put the Seminary in close contact with its churches; these were the pro- jects discussed, often and earnestly. The latter project prevailed, and purchase was made in 1856 of the corner west of Ashland Avenue and south of West Lake street, relying on local interest to help in making payments. This reliance failed, and business was found crowding on that corner. So exchange was made for the entire front of the next block south, facing on Union Park, in 1858. Payment on this location gave the Directors their sorest financial embarrassment. Inability to make over- due collections brought the Seminary into peril. Hence the depressing influence felt and exerted by the Triennial 27 Convention of 1861. As on other occasions, from this distress the Seminary was rescued by such friends as Philo Carpenter, C. G. Hammond, E. W. Blatchford, J. M. Williams, T. M. Avery and S. M. Moore. Others in their way tugged at this work as they were able, and their names are not forgotten by Him, for whose dear sake they did it. This relief saved to the Seminary only the south 75 feet of its location, on which then stood its temporary building. This location, though inadequate, being free from incumbrance, was highly prized. Its inadequacy, however, led to further inquiry and endeavor. At the meeting of the Board of Directors, in April, 1865, Philo Carpenter, Esq., who so often had helped the Board over hard places, carne again to their relief. He offered to take the corner on Ashland Avenue and West Washington street, and give in exchange the corner west of Ashland and north of Warren Avenues, fronting on Union Park. Thereby was secured for the Seminary an adequate and permanent location. The remainder of the park-front in this block is owned and used by the Union Park Congregational Church, whose building and those of the Seminary are made to harmon- ize in style and structure, thereby each adding to the beauty of the other. This exchange involved a gift of $7,000, at prices then current. And this was understood between Mr. Carpenter and the Board to be in lieu of his former conditional gift of $5,000 to the Professorship of Ecclesiastical History. The Board, gratefully recogniz- ing the liberality of Mr. Carpenter, then and previously, voted to call the main building to be erected on that site "Carpenter Hall." So, after much and sore tribulation (more fully shown below in the section on "General Funds,") the Directors came into possession of a location, 28 which, when the buildings are completed, will be ade- quate, perhaps for generations, and which may be regarded as fitting and beautiful. In the matter of personal services, mention should be made of the Boards of Directors and Visitors, who, within a wide circle, reaching from Detroit to Indianapo- lis, St. Louis, Grinnell, Minneapolis and Milwaukee, have at great personal sacrifice, been prompt in attendance at their several and many meetings. They have come to- gether not to ratify plans previously formulated, but have taken all the interests of the Seminary into full consider- ation, giving them protracted and laborious study, and then handling them as best they could. The most difficult and perplexing details of their work have been passed over to the Executive Committee, and in managing them this committee have given such service as could be obtained only for the reward of help- ing so important an interest as the Eedeemer's Kingdom. Mention should also be made of the Board of Audit- ors, who, annually, have taken up the numerous accounts of the treasury, giving them full investigation and ascer- taining their exact condition before reporting them to the Board of Directors with approval all this gratuitously and as a work of love. A gratitude which burdens the hearts of many friends of the Seminary, would be denied expression if no men- tion were made of the sacrifices borne and the efforts made by friends of the Seminary who have had much to do in looking after its pecuniary interests. As elsewhere noted, Philo Carpenter has repeatedly shown himself an active and liberal friend of the Seminary. Among others, mention should also be made of C. G. Hammond, E. W. Blatchford, and J. W. Scoville, who, as liberal donors to 29 the Seminary, have repeatedly brought it opportune re- lief in gifts of money and wisdom. The two latter also as a Financial Committee of the Executive Committee, have rendered a laborious and invaluable service in advis- ing the Treasurer as to making investments, and in aiding him to secure those imperiled by financial depression. If particulars could be given, a grateful sense of this obliga- tion would be widely felt. VIII. BUILDINGS. The Seminary found its earliest home in the parlors of the First Congregational Church of Chicago. These as chapel, lecture and recitation rooms it used, till they were found inadequate. This church, in 1859, offered to the Seminary the use for five years of an unfinished mission building standing a few blocks west of Union Park. This was accepted and removed to the corner of Ashland Ave- nue and West Washington street. To it were added the rooms most urgently needed. This building was for the use of the Seminary, and those who afterward were organ- ized into the Union Park Congregational Church. To this church, from its infancy, the Professors of the Semi- nary ministered, for nearly seven years, till its first pas- tor, Rev. C. D. Helmer, came thereby not only eking out a living which the treasury of the Seminary failed to afford, but also fostering a church, which in its maturity became, like the First Church, a nursing mother to the Seminary. 30 Meantime it was found impracticable to do without dormitories. The difficulty of having students scattered into different parts of the city, hindering the maintenance of the essential esprit du corps, led to renting part of the Union Park Hotel, which in 1864 was used by the students for dormitories. The location of the Seminary having been removed to the corner of Ashland and Warren Avenues, opportu- nity was afforded for the erection of permanent buildings, which were demanded by the growth of the institution. Willard Keyes, Esq., of Quincy, Illinois, having given a block of land in that city toward endowing the Profes- sorship of Ecclesiastical History, consented that the avails of it might be used in the erection of a Hall. This first permanent building, "Keyes Hall," was completed in the autumn of 1865. Besides rooms for general use, it con- tains studies and dormitories for 38 students. When completed it was not able to meet the wants created by the growth of the Seminary. In 1868 was begun the erection of the north wing of the main building, called "Carpenter Hall," in acknowl- edgment of obligation to Philo Carpenter, hitherto the most liberal and opportune donor to the Seminary. In 1869 it was ready for use, and contains a chapel, lecture room and twenty suites of rooms for students. Most of the dormitories and studies in both these halls have been comfortably furnished by churches or individuals. In the erection of these buildings a debt was incurred, which long has been a weight upon the Seminary, and now amounts to $18,600. 31 IX. LIBRARY. So important is a library to a Theological Seminary, that steps were taken to secure one for the Chicago Semi- nary before it was opened. In 1856 the valuable library of Eev. Geo. W. Perkins, containing 500 volumes, was accepted from his estate as payment of his donation of $500 to the Seminary. Valuable gifts of books were secured by Eev. Wm. Patton, D. D., of New Haven, Ct., while traveling in England. Contributions of books were made by Revs. Prof. Twining, J. L. Corning, G. S. F. Savage, D. D., G. F. Magoun, D. D., J. P. Gulliver, D. D., L. Parker, G. B. Hubbard, L. Farnham, A. S. Kedzie, A. W. Porter, E. M. Pearson, T. G. Brainard, H. H. Morgan, and others; also by A. Kingman, Esq., of Bos- ton, Mass., E. Carter and D. Appleton, Esqs., of New York city; James Eeed, Esq., of Stockbridge, Mass. ; Eev. D. Wilson, of Port Byron, N. Y. ; Warren F. Draper, of Andover, Mass., and by Eev. E. N. Kirk, D. D., of Bos- ton, Mass., the last being Walton's Polly glott Bible, in eight folio volumes, worth $250. Prof. Bartlett, while Librarian, secured donations, principally from New England Church of Chicago, to the amount of nearly $1000, f Systematic Theology. . . . , . .. i;, \ 'I' w HOPKINS, A. M., Sweetzer 6 Michigan Professor of Ecclesiastical History. REV. S. IVES CURTISS, PH.D., D.D., New England Prof, of Old Testinin-nt Literature. Ui.v. (i. B. WILLCOX, D. D., Prof essor of Pastoral Tneology dk Special Studies. E. M. BOOTH, InNtniflin- in Elocution. PROF. (i. N. BOARDMAN, D. D., Lihrnritni. REV. A. S. KKD/IK, Ki\\\< i\i. Si.< ni.TARY. REV. G. S. F. SAVAGE, D.D., THI: \*i I;I;K. OFFICE: 112 WKST WA8HINOTOU STIU:I:T. CHICAGO, ILL. 6 VH o 1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY